Docoh
Loading...

WISH ContextLogic

Employees

Data from SEC filings
Employee count

ESG framework mentions

In last year of SEC filings
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)
No mentions
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
No mentions
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
No mentions
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
No mentions

Shareholder alignment

Proxy contests and exempt solicitations in last 3 years

No recent proxy contest or exempt solicitation filings from shareholders.

Vote support at last AGM
On June 8, 2021, ContextLogic Inc. (the “Company”) held its 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). At the Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders voted on four proposals, each of which is described in more detail in the Company’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2021. The following is a brief description of each matter voted upon and the final voting results for each matter.

Proposal 1. Each of the eight nominees for director proposed by the Company was elected to serve until the Company’s 2022 annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her respective successor has been duly elected and qualified. The voting results were as follows:

Director NameVotes ForVotes WithheldBroker Non-Votes
Piotr Szulczewski2,082,317,9954,984,51323,291,674
Julie Bradley2,081,694,8875,607,62123,291,674
Ari Emanuel2,079,173,1228,129,38623,291,674
Joe Lonsdale2,081,398,2915,904,21723,291,674
Jacqueline Reses2,086,292,7761,009,73223,291,674
Tanzeen Syed2,079,284,3678,018,14123,291,674
Stephanie Tilenius2,081,164,9536,137,55523,291,674
Hans Tung2,081,344,4585,958,05023,291,674


Proposal 2. Stockholders ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. The voting results were as follows:

Votes ForVotes AgainstAbstentionsBroker Non-Votes
2,109,548,784210,731834,667


Proposal 3. Stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The voting results were as follows:

Votes ForVotes AgainstAbstentionsBroker Non-Votes
2,078,975,1848,230,87196,45323,291,674


Proposal 4. Stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, a frequency of holding a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers of every one year. The voting results were as follows:

1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstentionsBroker Non-Votes
2,087,072,42349,67093,54486,871