Company profile

Ticker
ADP
Exchange
Website
CEO
Carlos A. Rodriguez
Employees
Incorporated
Location
Fiscal year end
SEC CIK
IRS number
221467904

ADP stock data

(
)

Calendar

30 Oct 20
3 Dec 20
30 Jun 21

News

Quarter (USD) Sep 20 Mar 20 Dec 19 Sep 19
Revenue
Cost of revenue
Operating income
Operating margin
Net income
Net profit margin
Cash on hand
Change in cash
Diluted EPS
Annual (USD) Jun 20 Jun 19 Jun 18 Jun 17
Revenue
Cost of revenue
Operating income
Operating margin
Net income
Net profit margin
Cash on hand
Change in cash
Diluted EPS

Financial data from company earnings reports.

Date Owner Security Transaction Code 10b5-1 $Price #Shares $Value #Remaining
16 Nov 20 Ayala John Common Stock Sell Dispose S Yes 175 6,485 1.13M 26,526.849
16 Nov 20 Ayala John Common Stock Option exercise Aquire M Yes 146.75 6,485 951.67K 33,011.849
16 Nov 20 Ayala John Stock Option Common Stock Option exercise Dispose M No 146.75 6,485 951.67K 12,970
16 Nov 20 O'Brien Dermot J Common Stock Sell Dispose S Yes 175 12,406 2.17M 13,546.854
16 Nov 20 O'Brien Dermot J Common Stock Option exercise Aquire M Yes 146.75 12,406 1.82M 25,952.854
16 Nov 20 O'Brien Dermot J Stock Option Common Stock Option exercise Dispose M No 146.75 12,406 1.82M 12,406
12 Nov 20 Matthew Levin Common Stock Payment of exercise Dispose F No 169.43 2,476 419.51K 7,283
11 Nov 20 Ready William J Common Stock Grant Aquire A No 0 1,803 0 14,196
77.9% owned by funds/institutions
13F holders
Current Prev Q Change
Total holders 1510 1557 -3.0%
Opened positions 102 123 -17.1%
Closed positions 149 112 +33.0%
Increased positions 502 543 -7.6%
Reduced positions 616 603 +2.2%
13F shares
Current Prev Q Change
Total value 48.86B 49.75B -1.8%
Total shares 334.16M 334.16M +0.0%
Total puts 1.41M 1.31M +7.5%
Total calls 1.23M 1.28M -4.5%
Total put/call ratio 1.1 1.0 +12.6%
Largest owners
Shares Value Change
Vanguard 38.18M $5.33B -1.0%
BLK Blackrock 30.95M $4.32B -3.7%
STT State Street 18.64M $2.62B -1.6%
MS Morgan Stanley 13.55M $1.89B +17.4%
BK Bank Of New York Mellon 12.73M $1.78B +17.8%
Alliancebernstein 11.12M $1.55B +0.6%
Wellington Management 10.86M $1.51B +16.8%
BAC Bank Of America 9.52M $1.33B -4.1%
WFC Wells Fargo & Co. 9.12M $1.27B +0.1%
Geode Capital Management 7.58M $1.06B +1.3%
Largest transactions
Shares Bought/sold Change
Polen Capital Management 415.19K -5.68M -93.2%
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. 6.82M -2.96M -30.3%
Harris Associates L P 2.94M +2.05M +229.3%
MS Morgan Stanley 13.55M +2M +17.4%
BK Bank Of New York Mellon 12.73M +1.92M +17.8%
Wellington Management 10.86M +1.56M +16.8%
Nordea Investment Management Ab 2.29M -1.49M -39.4%
BLK Blackrock 30.95M -1.19M -3.7%
BNS Bank Of Nova Scotia 1.1M +1.1M NEW
Renaissance Technologies 1.14M +979.8K +619.0%

Financial report summary

?
Risks
  • Failure to comply with, or changes in, laws and regulations applicable to our businesses could have a materially adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations or financial condition, or have other adverse consequences
  • Failure to comply with anti-corruption laws and regulations, economic and trade sanctions, anti-money laundering laws and regulations, and similar laws could have a materially adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations or financial condition, or have other adverse consequences
  • Failure to comply with privacy, data protection and cyber security laws and regulations could have a materially adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations or financial condition, or have other adverse consequences
  • Our businesses collect, host, store, transfer, process, disclose, use, secure and retain and dispose of personal and business information, and collect, hold and transmit client funds, and a security or privacy breach may damage or disrupt our businesses, result in the disclosure of confidential information, damage our reputation, increase our costs, cause losses and materially adversely affect our results of operations
  • Our systems, applications, solutions and services may be subject to disruptions that could have a materially adverse effect on our business and reputation
  • A disruption of the data centers or cloud-computing services that we utilize could have a materially adverse effect on our business
  • If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, it could materially adversely affect our business and our brand
  • We may be sued by third parties for infringement of their proprietary rights, which could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations
  • If we fail to upgrade, enhance and expand our technology and services to meet client needs and preferences, the demand for our solutions and services may materially diminish
  • We may not realize or sustain the expected benefits from our business transformation initiatives, and these efforts could have a materially adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition, results of operations and competitive position
  • A major natural disaster or catastrophic event could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, or have other adverse consequences
  • Political and economic factors may materially adversely affect our business and financial results
  • Our business could be negatively impacted as a result of actions by activist stockholders or others
  • Change in our credit ratings could adversely impact our operations and lower our profitability
  • We may be unable to attract and retain qualified personnel
Content analysis ?
Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability
H.S. freshman Avg
New words: arising, assert, asserting, bearing, began, benchmark, binomial, bringing, capacity, cessation, curve, degree, digital, discharge, District, entertainment, environment, ERISA, fiduciary, flat, forfeiture, grew, headcount, higher, implied, Jersey, judicial, modification, move, output, platform, preliminary, proceeding, procurement, reached, redeemed, regulating, safely, stabilize, staggered, streamline, threshold, translation, unamortized, Workplace
Removed: acting, administration, aged, assessed, backed, balanced, brand, combine, comparability, Corporation, correct, correction, deliver, delivery, deterioration, enriched, fail, favor, footnote, force, fully, fund, gain, hindsight, historic, historically, identification, initial, initiative, instrument, irrevocable, January, journey, maintenance, mortgage, National, negligent, November, obligor, offered, optional, origination, permitted, practical, previously, prospective, record, reducing, redundant, reflecting, reimburse, revised, revision, secure, simplified, standby, successful, SUI, supranational, termination, transfer, transition, unfavorability, unjustly, VERP, voluntary, workforce, wrote, yielding

Patents

GRANT
Utility
Methods for enabling a computer to migrate microservices and to perform microservice templating
1 Dec 20
Enabling migration of code in a service oriented architecture executed in a distributed computing environment.
GRANT
Utility
Data normalizing system
1 Dec 20
A method and apparatus for normalizing data.
GRANT
Utility
Double-blind research portal
1 Dec 20
A computer-implemented method, system, and computer program product for research in a double-blind framework, links, by a data processing system, a double-blind framework application to an intra-network database, provides a double-blind framework portal linked to the double-blind framework application, and responsive to a request entered on the double-blind framework portal, provides to a requestor, responses to research surveys directed to an audience selected from the intra-network database based on an intra-change system.
GRANT
Utility
Computing validation and error discovery in computers executing a multi-level tax data validation engine
1 Dec 20
A computer-method for improving operation of a computer by validating incoming data provided to a tax evaluation software program.
APP
Utility
Static Analysis of Code Coverage Metrics Provided by Functional User Interface Tests Using Tests Written In Metadata
26 Nov 20
A computer-implemented method for determining code coverage of an application under test (AUT) from automated tests includes obtaining, from a storage by a number of processors, metadata from the automated tests for the AUT.