P5Y0.00750.85P1YP1YP5YP3YP4YP5YP5YP5YP3YP6MP24M0.100.1P30Dfalse--12-31FY20192019-12-3100000042814000000300000000.060.060.060.060.240.060.060.060.020.020.240.2443285518300.05870.05400.05950.05900.051250.04750.01630.061500.06750.550.550.350.200.250.1520212022202300000000026.87503.7520.15633.750054602400P6MP3YP3Y0.33330.33330.3333P10Y

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20192022
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-3610
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC.
ARCONIC INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware25-0317820
(State of incorporation)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
201 Isabella Street, Suite 200,, Pittsburgh,, Pennsylvania15212-5872
(Address of principal executive offices)      (Zip code)
Investor Relations----------------(412) 553-1950
Office of the Secretary-----------(412) (412) 553-1940
(Registrant’s telephone numbers, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Trading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered 
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per shareARNCHWMNew York Stock Exchange
$3.75 Cumulative Preferred Stock,
par value $100.00 per share
ARNCHWM PRNYSE American
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes   No     .
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  
Yes        No .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes    No     .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes   No     .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer []        Accelerated filer []    Non-accelerated filer []
Smaller reporting company         Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   No .
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b). Yes No
The aggregate market value of the outstanding common stock, other than shares held by persons who may be deemed affiliates of the registrant, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $11$13 billion. As of February 21, 2020,10, 2023, there were 435,918,568412,282,856 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the registrant outstanding.
Documents incorporated by reference.
Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates by reference certain information from the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A (Proxy Statement).



Explanatory Note
On April 1, 2020, Arconic Inc. completed the separation of its business into two independent, publicly-traded companies: Howmet Aerospace Inc. (the new name for Arconic Inc.) and Arconic Corporation. The financial results of Arconic Corporation for all periods prior to April 1, 2020 have been retrospectively reflected in the Statement of Consolidated Operations as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from continuing operations and segment results for all periods prior to April 1, 2020. The cash flows, comprehensive income, and equity related to Arconic Corporation have not been segregated and are included in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows, Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income, and Statement of Changes in Consolidated Equity, respectively, for all periods prior to April 1, 2020.


TABLE OF CONTENTS 
Page(s)Page
Part I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Part II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Part IIIItem 9C.
Part III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Part IV
Item 15.
Item 16.
Note on Incorporation by Reference
In this Form 10-K, selected items of information and data are incorporated by reference to portions of Howmet Aerospace Inc.’s definitive proxy statement for its 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”), which we expect to file with the Proxy Statement.Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after Howmet Aerospace Inc.’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. Unless otherwise provided herein, any reference in this report to disclosures in the Proxy Statement shall constitute incorporation by reference of only that specific disclosure into this Form 10-K.


PART I


Item 1. Business.
General
Arconic Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal office in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and the successor to Arconic Pennsylvania (as defined below) which was formed in 1888 and formerly known as Alcoa Inc. In this report, unless the context otherwise requires, “Arconic” or the “Company” means Arconic Inc., a Delaware corporation, and all subsidiaries consolidated for the purposes of its financial statements.
The Company’s Internet address is http://www.arconic.comContents. Arconic makes available free of charge on or through its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information on the Company’s Internet site is not a part of, or incorporated by reference in, this annual report on Form 10-K. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains these reports at http://www.sec.gov.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains (and oral communications made by ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. (“Howmet”) may contain) statements that relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “goal,” “guidance,” “intends,” “may,” “outlook,” “plans,” “projects,” “seeks,” “sees,” “should,” “targets,” “will,” “would,” or other words of similar meaning. All statements that reflect Arconic’sHowmet’s expectations, assumptions or projections about the future, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements, forecasts and outlook relating to the growthcondition of the aerospace, automotive, commercial transportation and other end markets; statements and guidance regarding future financial results, operating performance, or operating performance; statements about Arconic’sestimated or expected future capital expenditures; future strategic actions; Howmet's strategies, outlook, and business and financial prospects; and any future dividends and repurchases of its debt or equity securities. These statements regarding potential share gains. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performancereflect beliefs and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and changes in circumstancesassumptions that are difficult to predict.based on Howmet’s perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors Howmet believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Although ArconicHowmet believes that the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that these expectations will be attained and it is possible that actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties, and uncertainties.
changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. For a discussion of some of the specific factors that may cause Arconic’sHowmet’s actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements, see the following sections of this report: Part I, Item 1A.1A (Risk Factors), Part II, Item 7.7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations), including the disclosures under Segment Information and Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates, and Note VT to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data)8. Market projections are subject to the risks discussed in this report and other risks in the market. ArconicHowmet disclaims any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether in response to new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Overview


PART I
Item 1. Business.
General
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (formerly known as Arconic Inc. (“Arconic” or the “Company”) is a global leaderDelaware corporation with its principal office in lightweight metals engineeringPittsburgh, Pennsylvania and manufacturing. Arconic’s innovative, multi-material products, which include aluminum, titanium, and nickel, are used worldwide in aerospace, automotive, commercial transportation, building and construction, industrial applications, defense, and packaging.
Arconic is a global company operating in 18 countries. Based upon the country where the point of sale occurred, the United States and Europe generated 67% and 23%, respectively, of Arconic’s sales in 2019. In addition, Arconic has operating activities in numerous countries and regions outside the United States, including Europe, Canada, China, Japan, and Russia. Governmental policies, laws and regulations, and other economic factors, including inflation and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, affect the results of operations in countries with such operating activities.
Arconic has two reportable segments, which are organized by product on a worldwide basis: Engineered Products and Forgings (EP&F) and Global Rolled Products (GRP).
Background
Arconic Inc. Reincorporation
On December 31, 2017 (the “Effective Date”),successor to Arconic Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Arconic Pennsylvania” or, prior toformed in 1888 and formerly known as Alcoa Inc. In this report, unless the Reincorporation (as defined below)context otherwise requires, “Howmet”, the “Company”), effected the change“we”, “us” and “our” refer to Howmet Aerospace Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The Company’s Internet address is http://www.howmet.com. Howmet makes available free of the Company’s jurisdiction of incorporation from Pennsylvaniacharge on or through its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to Delaware (the “Reincorporation”) by merging (the “Reincorporation Merger”) with a direct wholly owned Delaware subsidiary, Arconic (in this section, “Arconic Delaware”those reports filed or following the Reincorporation, the “Company”),furnished pursuant to an Agreement and PlanSection 13(a) or 15(d) of Merger (the “Reincorporation Merger Agreement”), dated as of October 12, 2017, by and

between Arconic Pennsylvania and Arconic Delaware.  Arconic Pennsylvania shareholders approved the Reincorporation Merger to effect the Reincorporation at a Special Meeting of Shareholders held on November 30, 2017. As a result of the Reincorporation, (i) Arconic Pennsylvania has ceased to exist, (ii) Arconic Delaware automatically inherited the reporting obligations of Arconic Pennsylvania under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amendedwell as proxy statements, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company's website is included in this annual report on Form 10-K as an inactive textual reference only. The information on, or accessible through, the Company’s website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference in, this annual report on Form 10-K. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains these reports at http://www.sec.gov.
Background
As described below, Howmet Aerospace Inc. was previously named Arconic Inc. and, prior to that, Alcoa Inc.
The Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction. On April 1, 2020, Arconic Inc. separated its businesses (the “Exchange Act”“Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction”), into two independent, publicly traded companies: Howmet Aerospace Inc. (the new name for Arconic Inc.) and (iii) Arconic Delaware is deemed to beCorporation. Following this separation, Howmet retained the successor issuerEngine Products, Fastening Systems, Engineered Structures, and Forged Wheels businesses; and its prior Rolled Products, Aluminum Extrusions, and Building and Construction Systems businesses were spun-off to Arconic Pennsylvania.
The common stock, par value $1.00 per share, ofCorporation. In connection with the Arconic Pennsylvania (the “Arconic Pennsylvania Common Stock”) was listed for trading onInc. Separation Transaction, Howmet and Arconic Corporation entered into several agreements that govern the New York Stock Exchange and traded under the symbol “ARNC.” Asrelationship of the Effective Date, this symbol, without interruption, represents sharesparties following the separation.
The 2017 Reincorporation in Delaware. On December 31, 2017, Arconic Inc., then a Pennsylvania corporation, changed its jurisdiction of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Arconic Delaware (the “Arconic Delaware Common Stock”). There was no change in the Exchange Act File Number assigned by the SEC as a result of the Reincorporation.incorporation from Pennsylvania to Delaware.
As of the Effective Date, the rights of the Company’s stockholders began to be governed by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Certificate of Incorporation of Arconic Delaware (the “Delaware Certificate”) and the Bylaws of Arconic Delaware (the “Delaware Bylaws”).
Other than the change in corporate domicile, the Reincorporation did not result in any change in the business, physical location, management, financial condition or number of authorized shares of the Company, nor did it result in any change in location of its current employees, including management.  On the Effective Date, (i) the directors and officers of Arconic Pennsylvania prior to the Reincorporation continued as the directors and officers of Arconic Delaware after the Reincorporation, (ii) each outstanding share of Arconic Pennsylvania Common Stock was automatically converted into one share of Arconic Delaware Common Stock, (iii) each outstanding share of Serial Preferred Stock, par value $100 per share, of Arconic Pennsylvania (the “Arconic Pennsylvania Preferred Stock”) was automatically converted into one share of Serial Preferred Stock, par value $100 per share, of Arconic Delaware (the “Arconic Delaware Preferred Stock”) and (iv) all of Arconic Pennsylvania’s employee benefit and compensation plans immediately prior to the Reincorporation were continued by Arconic Delaware, and each outstanding equity award and notional share unit relating to shares of Arconic Pennsylvania Common Stock was converted into an equity award or notional share unit, as applicable, relating to an equivalent number of shares of Arconic Delaware Common Stock on the same terms and subject to the same conditions. Beginning at the effective time of the Reincorporation, each certificate representing Arconic Pennsylvania Common Stock or Arconic Pennsylvania Preferred Stock was deemed for all corporate purposes to evidence ownership of Arconic Delaware Common Stock or Arconic Delaware Preferred Stock, as applicable. The Company’s stockholders may, but are not required to, exchange their stock certificates as a result of the Reincorporation.
The foregoing descriptions of the Arconic Delaware Common Stock, the Arconic Delaware Preferred Stock, the Delaware Certificate and the Delaware Bylaws are qualified in their entirety by the full text of the Delaware Certificate and the Delaware Bylaws, which are filed as Exhibits 3(a) and 3(b), respectively, to this report.
Alcoa CorporationInc. Separation Transaction
Transaction. On November 1, 2016, Alcoa Inc. completed the separation of its business (the “Alcoa Inc. Separation Transaction”) into two independent, publicly traded companies (the “Separation of Alcoa”) – Alcoa Corporation andcompanies: Arconic Inc. (the new name for Alcoa Inc., which, through the transactions described above, later became Howmet Aerospace Inc.). and Alcoa Corporation. Following this separation, the Separation of Alcoa, Alcoa Corporation holdsCompany retained the Engineered Products and Solutions, Global Rolled Products, and Transportation and Construction Solutions businesses; and its previous Alumina and Primary Metals segments, thebusinesses, rolling mill at theoperations in Warrick, Indiana operations and the 25.1% stakeinterest in the Ma’aden Rolling Company in Saudi Arabia previously held by the Company. The Company retained the Global Rolled Products (other than the rolling mill at the Warrick, Indiana operations and the 25.1% ownership stake in the Ma’aden Rolling Company), Engineered Products and Solutions and Transportation and Construction Solutions segments.
The Separation of Alcoa was effected by a pro rata distribution of 80.1% of the outstanding shares of Alcoa Corporation common stockwere spun-off to the Company’s shareholders (the “Distribution of Alcoa”). The Company’s shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 20, 2016 (the “Record Date”) received one share of Alcoa Corporation common stock for every three shares of the Company’s common stock held as of the Record Date. The Company did not issue fractional shares of Alcoa Corporation common stock in the Distribution of Alcoa. Instead, each shareholder otherwise entitled to receive a fractional share of Alcoa Corporation common stock received cash in lieu of fractional shares.
The Company distributed 146,159,428 shares of common stock of Alcoa Corporation in the Distribution of Alcoa and retained 36,311,767 shares, or approximately 19.9%, of the common stock of Alcoa Corporation immediately following the Distribution of Alcoa. As a result of the Distribution of Alcoa, Alcoa Corporation became an independent public company trading under the symbol “AA” on the New York Stock Exchange, and the Company trades under the symbol “ARNC” on the New York Stock Exchange.
During 2017, the Company disposed of its retained interest in Alcoa Corporation. In February 2017, the Company sold 23,353,000 shares of Alcoa Corporation stock at $38.03 per share, which resulted in cash proceeds of $888 million and a gain of $351 million. In April and May 2017, the Company acquired a portion of its outstanding notes held by two investment banks (the “Investment Banks”) in exchange for cash and the Company’s remaining 12,958,767 shares (valued at $35.91 per share) in

Alcoa Corporation stock (the “Debt-for-Equity Exchange”) and recorded a gain of $167 million. The gains of $351 million and $167 million associated with the disposition of the Alcoa Corporation shares were recorded in Other expense (income), net in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations in Part II, Item 8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data).
On October 31, 2016, in connection with the Alcoa Inc. Separation of Alcoa andTransaction, the Distribution of Alcoa, Arconictwo companies entered into several agreements with Alcoa Corporation or its subsidiaries that govern the relationshiptheir post-separation relationship.
Overview
Howmet is a leading global provider of the parties following the Distribution of Alcoa, including the following: Separation and Distribution Agreement, Transition Services Agreement, Tax Matters Agreement, Employee Matters Agreement, certain Patent, Know-How, Trade Secret License and Trademark License Agreements, Toll Processing and Services Agreement, Master Agreementadvanced engineered solutions for the Supply of Primary Aluminum, Massena Leaseaerospace and Operations Agreement, Fusina Lease and Operations Agreement, and Stockholder and Registration Rights Agreement.transportation industries. The Toll Processing and Services Agreement expired by its terms at the end of 2018.
Recent Developments
On January 22, 2019, the Company announced that its Board of Directors (the Board) had determined to no longer pursue a potential sale of Arconic as part of its strategy and portfolio review. Management and the Board had been conducting a rigorous and comprehensive strategy and portfolio review over the past year and as part of that process had considered a sale of the Company, among other matters. However, the Company did not receive a proposal for a full-Company transaction that management and the Board believed would be in the best interest of Arconic’s shareholders and other stakeholders. Management and the Board remain confident in Arconic’s significant potential and are strongly focusedCompany’s primary businesses focus on enhancing value for shareholders, through continued operational improvements and through other potential initiatives which had been previously identified in the strategy and portfolio review.
On February 8, 2019, Arconic announced, as part of its strategy and portfolio review, a separation of its portfolio into two independent, publicly-traded companies (the “Separation of Arconic”). The Engineered Products and Forgings (EP&F) businesses (engine products,jet engine components, aerospace fastening systems, engineered structures and airframe structural components necessary for mission-critical performance and efficiency in aerospace and defense applications, as well as forged wheels) will remainaluminum wheels for commercial transportation. Howmet’s technological capabilities support the innovation and growth of next-generation aerospace programs. Its differentiated technologies enable lighter, more fuel-efficient aircraft and commercial trucks to operate with a lower carbon footprint and support more sustainable air and ground transportation.
Howmet is a global company operating in 20 countries. Based upon the existing company, which will be renamedcountry where the point of shipment occurred, North America and Europe generated 71% and 22%, respectively, of Howmet’s sales in 2022. In addition, Howmet Aerospace Inc.has operating activities in numerous countries and change its stock ticker from “ARNC” to “HWM” in connection with the separation. The Global Rolled Products (GRP) businesses (global rolled products, aluminum extrusionsregions outside of North America and buildingEurope, including China and construction systems) will be held by a new company that will be named Arconic Corporation at separation and that intends to list its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARNC.”Japan.
1
On

Timothy D. Myers will serve as Arconic Corporation Chief Executive Officer. The Arconic Inc. Board has also named new directors to the Arconic Corporation and Howmet Aerospace Boards:
Joining the Arconic Corporation Board of Directors will be: Timothy Myers; William Austen; Christopher Ayers*; Margaret Billson; Austin Camporin; Jacques Croisetiere; Elmer Doty*; Carol Eicher; Fritz Henderson; E. Stanley O’Neal*; and Jeffrey Stafeil.
* Will resign from the Arconic Inc. Board
Joining the Howmet Aerospace Board will be: Joseph Cantie; Robert Leduc; Jody Miller; and Nicole Piasecki.
The Separation of Arconic will occur by means of a pro rata distribution by Arconic Inc. (which will be renamed Howmet Aerospace Inc.) of all of the outstanding common stock of Arconic Corporation (the Distribution of Arconic). The Distribution of Arconic is intended to qualify as a tax-free transaction to Arconic Inc. stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Distribution of Arconic Information
At the time of separation, Arconic Inc. stockholders are expected to receive one share of Arconic Corporation common stock for every four shares of Arconic Inc. common stock held as of the record date. The record date will be March 19, 2020 and the time of the distribution will be 12:01 A.M. on April 1, 2020.
At the time of separation, stockholders of Arconic Inc. will retain their shares of Arconic Inc. Due to the name change of Arconic Inc. to Howmet Aerospace Inc. upon separation, these shares will become Howmet Aerospace Inc. shares.
No fractional shares of Arconic Corporation common stock will be issued in the distribution, and stockholders will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares. The separation distribution is expected to be paid on April 1, 2020 to Arconic Inc. stockholders of record as of the close of business on the record date.
The distribution remains subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions described in Arconic Rolled Products Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form 10, as amended. The Form 10 has been filed by Arconic Rolled Products Corporation with the SEC and is available at www.arconic.com.

No action is required by Arconic Inc. stockholders to receive shares of Arconic Corporation common stock in the distribution. Arconic Inc. expects to make available an information statement to all stockholders entitled to receive the distribution of shares of Arconic Corporation common stock. The information statement is filed as an exhibit to Arconic Rolled Products Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form 10 and describes Arconic Corporation and certain risks of owning Arconic Corporation common stock and provides other information regarding the separation and distribution.
Trading Common Stock
Arconic Inc. stockholders who hold shares of common stock on the record date of March 19, 2020, and decide to sell any of those shares before the distribution date, should consult their stockbroker, bank or other nominee to understand whether the shares of Arconic Inc. common stock will be sold with or without entitlement to Arconic Corporation common stock pursuant to the distribution.
Beginning on or about March 18, 2020, and continuing up to and through the distribution date, two markets are expected for Arconic Inc. common stock: the “regular-way” market and the “ex-distribution” market. Shares that trade in the “regular-way” market will be entitled to shares of Arconic Corporation common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution; shares that trade in the “ex-distribution” market will trade under the symbol HWM WI and without an entitlement to shares of Arconic Corporation common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution.
Arconic Corporation anticipates “when-issued” trading of its common stock will begin on or about March 18, 2020, under the symbol ARNC WI, and will continue up to and through the distribution date. “Regular-way” trading in Arconic Corporation’s common stock is expected to begin on April 1, 2020.
The separation date may change if certain conditions are not satisfied by that date, as described in Arconic Rolled Products Corporation’s information statement filed with the Form 10.
Note Offering
On February 7, 2020, the Company announced that Arconic Rolled Products Corporation (the “Issuer”), which is currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of Arconic, closed its offering of $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.125% second-lien notes due 2028 (the “Notes”).
The Issuer intends to use the proceeds from the offering to make a payment to Arconic to fund the transfer of certain assets from Arconic to the Issuer in connection with the Separation of Arconic and for general corporate purposes. The net proceeds from the offering will be held in escrow until the completion of the Separation of Arconic and the satisfaction of certain other escrow release conditions. Prior to the separation, the Notes will not be guaranteed. Following the separation, the Notes will be guaranteed by certain of the Issuer’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. Each of the Notes and the related guarantees will be secured on a second-priority basis by liens on certain assets of the Issuer and the guarantors.
The Notes and related guarantees were sold in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and to certain non-United States persons in offshore transactions in accordance with Regulation S under the Securities Act.
The Notes and related guarantees have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the benefit of, U.S. persons absent registration under, or an applicable exemption from, the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

Description of the Business
Information describing Arconic’s businesses can be found on the indicated pages of this report:
ItemPage(s)
Discussion of Recent Business Developments:
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements:
Segment Information:
Business Descriptions, Principal Products, Principal Markets, Methods of Distribution, Seasonality and Dependence Upon Customers:
Financial Information about Segments and Geographic Areas:
Major Product Sales
Products that contributed 10% or more to consolidated sales for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, were:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Innovative flat-rolled products

39% 40% 39%
Engine products24% 21% 21%
Fastening systems11% 11% 11%
Engineered structures8% 13% 13%
Arconic has no customer that accounts for 10% or more of its consolidated sales. However, certain of the Company’s businesses are dependent upon a few significant customers. The loss of any such significant customer could have a material adverse effect on such businesses.
Engineered Products and Forgings
Arconic’s Engineered Products and Forgings segment (“EP&F”)Company produces products that are used primarily in the aerospace (commercial and defense), industrial, commercial transportation, and power generation endindustrial and other markets. SuchHowmet seeks to provide its customers with innovative solutions through offering differentiated products include fastening systems (titanium, steel,such as airfoils with advanced cooling and nickel superalloys)coatings for extreme temperature applications; specially-designed fasteners for lightweight composite airframe construction, reduced assembly costs, and seamless rolled rings (mostly nickel superalloys);lightning strike protection; and lightweight aluminum commercial wheels. Its products and solutions include investment castings for jet engines and industrial gas turbines (nickel superalloys, titanium, and aluminum), including airfoils;airfoils and structural parts; seamless rolled rings for jet engines (mostly nickel superalloys); fastening systems for aerospace, industrial and commercial transportation applications (titanium, steel, and nickel superalloys); forged jet engine components (e.g., jet engine disks); extruded, machined and forged aircraft parts (titanium and aluminum); and forged aluminum commercial vehicle wheels, all of which are sold directly to customers andand/or through distributors. A small part of this segment also produces various forged
Aerospace (Commercial and machined metal products (titanium and aluminum) for various end markets.Defense) Market.
In the third quarter of 2019, the Company realigned its operations by eliminating its Transportation and Construction Solutions (TCS) segment and transferring the Forged Wheels business to its EP&F segment and the Building and Construction Systems business to its GRP segment, consistent with how the Chief Executive OfficerHowmet’s largest market is assessing operating performance and allocating capital in conjunction with the planned Separation of Arconic. The Latin American extrusions business,aerospace, which was formerly partrepresented approximately 62% of the Company's TCS segment untilCompany’s revenue in 2022. The Company produces a range of high performance multi-materials, highly engineered products, and vertically integrated machined solutions for aero engines and airframe structures, ranging from investment castings, advanced coatings, seamless rings, forgings, titanium extrusions, and titanium mill products, to fasteners that hold aircraft together. Wingtip to wingtip, nose to tail, Howmet can produce more than 90% of all structural and rotating aero engine components. Modernization of the commercial and defense platforms is driven by an array of challenging performance requirements. With its saleprecision engineering, materials science expertise and advanced manufacturing processes, Howmet aims to help its customers achieve greater fuel economies, reduced emissions, passenger comfort, and maintenance efficiencies.
Commercial Transportation Market. The commercial transportation market represented approximately 23% of the Company’s revenue in April2022. The Company invented the forged aluminum truck wheel in 1948, and continues to advance technology to deliver breakthrough solutions that make trucks and buses lighter, more fuel efficient and sharper-looking. Howmet’s forged aluminum wheels are a leading choice for commercial trucks and mass transportation vehicles because they can reduce weight and save fuel. The strength of 2018, was moved to Corporate. In the first quarterCompany’s rivets, bolts and fasteners offers another light-weighting solution that delivers performance.
Industrial and Other Markets. Industrial and other markets include industrial gas turbines, oil and gas, and other industrials, which represented approximately 15% of 2019, the Company transferred its aluminum extrusions operations (Aluminum Extrusions) from itsCompany’s revenue in 2022.
Howmet has four reportable segments, which are organized by product on a worldwide basis: Engine Products, Fastening Systems, Engineered Structures business unit within the EP&F segment to the GRP segment, based on synergies with GRP including similar customer base, technologies, and manufacturing capabilities.Forged Wheels.

Engine Products

Engine Products.Engine Products utilizes advanced designs and techniques to support next-generation engine programs and produces investment cast airfoils, seamless rolled rings and closed-die (including isothermal) forged turbine diskscomponents primarily for aero engineaircraft engines and industrial gas turbines, including airfoils and seamless rolled rings. Engine Products produces rotating parts as well as other structural aero engine components.parts. Engine Products also provides additive manufacturing technologies, superalloy ingots, open-die forging, machining, performance coatings,principally serves the commercial and hot isostatic pressing for high performance parts.defense aerospace markets as well as the industrial gas turbine market.
Fastening Systems. Systems
Fastening Systems produces aerospace and industrial fasteners, latches, bearings, fluid fittings and installation tools. In addition to highly engineered aerospace fasteners with a broad range of fastening systems, as well asthe segment also supplies the commercial transportation, fasteners.renewable, and material handling industries. The business’s high-tech, multi-material fastening systems are found nose to tail on commercial and military aircraft, and aero engines. The business’s products are also critical components ofas well as on jet engines, industrial gas turbines, automobiles, commercial transportation vehicles, wind turbines, solar power systems, and construction and industrial equipment.equipment.
Engineered Structures. Structures
Engineered Structures produces titanium and aluminum ingots and mill products for aerospace and defense applications and is vertically integrated to produce structural investment castings,titanium forgings, extrusions, forming and extrusions,machining services for airframe, wing, aero-engine, and landing gear components. Engineered Structures also provides multi-material airframe subassembliesproduces aluminum forgings, nickel forgings, and solutions related to advanced technologiesaluminum machined components and materials, such as 3D printingassemblies for aerospace and titanium aluminides.defense applications. The principal markets served by Engineered Structures are commercial aerospace, defense aerospace, and land and sea defense.
Forged Wheels.Wheels
Forged Wheels providesmanufactures forged aluminum wheels for trucks, buses, and trailers and related products for heavy-duty trucks and the global commercial transportation markets.market. The Company’s portfolio of wheels is sold under the product brand name Alcoa® Wheels, which are five times stronger and 47% lighter than steel wheels. The Ultra ONE® Wheel with MagnaForce® alloy is the lightest portfolio of wheels on the market. The Company’s proprietary Dura-Bright® surface treatment is unmatched in appearance and corrosion protection.
2


For additional discussion of the EP&Feach segment's business, see “Results of Operations—Segment Information” in Part II, Item 7.7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and Note DB to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data)8.
Sales by Market and Significant Customer Revenue
On MaySales by market for the years ended December 31, 2019, Arconic sold a small additive manufacturing facility outside of Austin, TX within the EP&F segment. The sale is subject to certain post-closing adjustments.
On August 15, 2019, Arconic sold inventories2022, 2021, and properties, plants, and equipment related to a small energy business (RTI Energy) within the EP&F segment.2020, were:
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 202220212020
Aerospace - Commercial46 %41 %50 %
Aerospace - Defense16 %19 %19 %
Commercial Transportation23 %23 %16 %
Industrial and Other15 %17 %15 %
In December 2019, Arconic c2022, General Electric Company and Raytheon Technologies Corporation represented approximately losed12% and 9%, respectively, of the saleCompany’s third-party sales. The loss of its forgings business in the United Kingdom subject to working capital and other adjustments. The forgings business primarily produced steel, titanium, and nickel based forged components for aerospace, mining, and off-highway markets and its operating results and assets and liabilities were included in the EP&F segment.any such significant customer could have a material adverse effect on such businesses. See Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors).

3
Engineered Products and Forgings

The Company's Principal Facilities1(1)
CountryFacility LocationSegmentProducts
AustraliaOakleighFastening SystemsFasteners
Canada
Georgetown, Ontario(2)
Engine ProductsAerospace Castings
Laval, QuébecEngine Products; Engineered StructuresAerospace Castings and Machining
China
Suzhou(2)
Engine Products; Fastening Systems; Forged WheelsFasteners, Rings and Wheels Machining
FranceDives-sur-MerEngine ProductsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings
EvronEngine ProductsAerospace and Specialty Castings
GennevilliersEngine ProductsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings
CountryFacilityProducts
AustraliaOakleighFasteners
Canada
Georgetown, Ontario2
Aerospace Castings
Laval, QuébecAerospace Castings and Machining
China
Suzhou2
Fasteners, Rings and Forgings
FranceDives-sur-MerAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings
EvronAerospace and Specialty Castings
GennevilliersAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings
MontbrisonFasteners
St. Cosme-en-Vairais2(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
ToulouseFastening SystemsFasteners
Us-par-VignyFastening SystemsFasteners
GermanyBestwigEngine ProductsAerospace Castings
ErwitteEngine ProductsMachining of Aerospace Castings
ErwitteAerospace Castings
Hildesheim-Bavenstedt2(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
Kelkheim2(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
Hungary
Nemesvámos

Fastening SystemsFasteners
SzékesfehérvárEngine Products; Forged WheelsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings and Forgings
Japan
JÔetsu City2(2)
ForgingsForged WheelsWheels Machining
Nomi
Engine Products
Aerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings

Mexico
Ciudad Acuña2(2)
Engine Products; Fastening SystemsAerospace Castings/FastenersRings and RingsFasteners
MonterreyForged WheelsForgings
Morocco
Casablanca2(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
United KingdomEcclesfieldIngot CastingsEngine ProductsMetal, Billets
Exeter2(2)
Engine ProductsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings and Alloy
GlossopIngot CastingsEngine ProductsMetal, Billets
IcklesIngot CastingsEngine ProductsMetal, Billets
Leicester2(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
Low MoorEngineered StructuresExtrusions
Redditch2(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
TelfordFastening SystemsFasteners
Welwyn Garden CityEngineered StructuresAerospace Formed Parts

4



CountryFacility LocationSegmentProducts
United States
Tucson, AZ(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
Carson, CA(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
City of Industry, CA(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
Fontana, CAEngine ProductsRings
Fullerton, CA(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
Rancho Cucamonga, CAEngine ProductsRings
CountryFacilityProducts
United States
Tucson, AZTorrance, CA2
Fastening SystemsFasteners
Carson, CABranford, CT2
FastenersEngine ProductsAerospace Coatings
City of Industry, CAWinsted, CT2
FastenersEngine ProductsAerospace Machining
Fontana, CASavannah, GARingsEngineered StructuresForgings, Disks
Fullerton, CA2
Fasteners
Rancho Cucamonga, CARings
Sylmar, CAFasteners
Torrance, CAFasteners
Branford, CTAerospace Coatings
Winsted, CTAerospace Machining
Savannah, GAForgings
La Porte, INEngine ProductsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings
Whitehall, MIEngine ProductsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings and Coatings, Titanium Alloy and Specialty Products
Washington, MOEngineered StructuresAerospace Formed Parts, Titanium Mill Products
Big Lake, MNEngineered StructuresAerospace Machining
New Brighton, MNEngineered StructuresAerospace Machining
Dover, NJEngine ProductsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings and Alloy
Verdi, NVRings
Kingston, NY2(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
Rochester, NYEngine ProductsRings
Barberton, OHForgingsForged WheelsWheels Machining
Canton, OH2(2)
Ferro-Titanium Alloys and Engineered StructuresTitanium Mill Products
Cleveland, OHEngine Products; Engineered Structures; Forged WheelsForgings, Investment Casting Equipment, and Aerospace Components Castings, Forgings and Oil & Gas Drilling Products
Niles, OHEngineered StructuresTitanium Mill Products
Morristown, TN2(2)
Engine ProductsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Ceramic Products
Houston, TX2(2)
Engineered StructuresExtrusions
Waco, TX2(2)
Fastening SystemsFasteners
Wichita Falls, TXEngine ProductsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings
Hampton, VA2(2)
Engine ProductsAerospace and Industrial Gas Turbine Castings
Martinsville, VAEngineered StructuresTitanium Mill Products
1
Principal facilities are listed, and do not include 22 locations that serve as sales and administrative offices, distribution centers or warehouses.
2
Leased property or partially leased property.
Global Rolled Products
Arconic’s Global Rolled Products segment (“GRP”) produces aluminum sheet and plate, aluminum extruded and machined parts, integrated aluminum structural systems, and architectural extrusions used(1)Principal facilities are listed by location, with certain locations having more than one facility. The list in the automotive, aerospace, buildingabove table does not include 19 locations that serve as sales and construction, industrial, packaging, and commercial transportation end markets. The following represent the business units within the Company’s GRP segment:
Rolled Products. Rolled products are used in the production of finished goods ranging from airframes and automotive body panels to industrial plate and brazing sheet. Sheet and plate are used extensively in the transportation industries as well as in building and construction. They are also used for industrial applications such as tooling plate for the production of plastic products.administrative offices, distribution centers or warehouses.
Aluminum Extrusions(2). Aluminum Extrusions produces a range of extruded products, including aerospace shapes (wing stringer, floor beams, fuselage, cargo), automotive shapes (driveshafts, anti-lock brake housings, turbo charger), seamless tube, hollows, mortar fins and high strength rod and bar. With process and product technologies that include large and smallLeased property or partially leased property.

extrusion presses, integrated cast houses, horizontal heat treat furnaces, vertical heat treat furnaces, annealing furnaces, induction billet heating and ultrasonic inspection capabilities, the Extrusions unit serves a broad range of customers in several of core market segments.
Building and Construction Systems. Building and Construction Systems (BCS) manufactures differentiated products and building envelope solutions, including entrances, curtain walls, windows, composite panel and coil coated sheet. The business operates in two market segments: architectural systems, which carry the Kawneer® brand, and architectural products, which carry the Reynobond® and Reynolux® brands. The BCS business has competitive positions in both market segments, attributable to its strong brand recognition, high quality products and strong relationships through the building and construction value chain.
As noted above, in the third quarter of 2019, the Company realigned its operations by eliminating its TCS segment and transferring the Forged Wheels business to its EP&F segment and the Building and Construction Systems (BCS) business to its GRP segment, consistent with how the Chief Executive Officer is assessing operating performance and allocating capital in conjunction with the planned Separation of Arconic. In the first quarter of 2019, the Company transferred its aluminum extrusions operations (Aluminum Extrusions) from its Engineered Structures business unit within the EP&F segment to the GRP segment, based on synergies with GRP including similar customer base, technologies, and manufacturing capabilities.
For additional discussion of the Global Rolled Products segment’s business, see “Results of Operations—Segment Information” in Part II, Item 7. (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data).
In February 2019, the Company announced an investment of approximately $100 million to expand its hot mill capability and add downstream equipment capabilities to manufacture industrial and automotive aluminum products in its Tennessee Operations facility near Knoxville, Tennessee. The project, which is expected to create 70 new jobs, is already underway and is expected to be complete by the fourth quarter of 2020.
In August 2019, Arconic reached an agreement to sell its aluminum rolling mill in Itapissuma, Brazil for $50 million in cash, subject to working capital and other adjustments. The rolling mill produces specialty foil and sheet products and its operating results and assets and liabilities are included in the GRP segment. The sale transaction closed February 1, 2020.
On October 30, 2019, Arconic reached an agreement to sell its hard alloy extrusions plant in South Korea for $61 million in cash, subject to working capital and other adjustments. The operating results and assets and liabilities of this plant are included in the GRP segment. The sale transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2020, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.


Global Rolled Products Principal Facilities1
5


CountryLocationProducts
CanadaLethbridge, AlbertaArchitectural Products
ChinaKunshanSheet and Plate
Qinhuangdao2
Sheet and Plate
France
Merxheim2
Architectural Products
Germany
Hannover2
Extrusions
HungarySzékesfehérvárSheet and Plate/Slabs and Billets
South KoreaKyoungnamExtrusions
RussiaSamaraSheet and Plate/Extrusions and Forgings
United KingdomBirminghamPlate
RuncornArchitectural Products
United States
Chandler, AZ2
Extrusions
Springdale, ARArchitectural Products
Visalia, CAArchitectural Products
Eastman, GAArchitectural Products
Danville, IL2
Sheet and Plate
Lafayette, INExtrusions
Davenport, IASheet and Plate
Hutchinson, KS3
Sheet and Plate
Baltimore, MD2
Extrusions
Massena, NYExtrusions
Bloomsburg, PAArchitectural Products
Cranberry, PAArchitectural Products
Lancaster, PASheet and Plate
Alcoa, TNSheet
Texarkana, TX2, 4
Slabs
San Antonio, TX5
Micromill™
1
Principal facilities are listed, and do not include 20 locations that serve as service centers or administrative offices. These service centers perform light manufacturing, such as assembly and fabrication of certain products.
2
Leased property or partially leased property.
3
Properties are satellite locations of the Davenport, Iowa facility.
4
The aluminum slab that is cast at Texarkana is turned into aluminum sheets at Arconic’s expanded automotive facility in Davenport, Iowa and its rolling mill in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. In October 2018, the Company sold the rolling mill and cast house to Ta Chen International, Inc. and leased the cast house building and equipment for a term of 18 months.  The Company’s lease expires April 30, 2020.
5
Micromill™ production facility produces sheet for automotive and industrial applications using Arconic innovative production process. The Company curtailed operations in San Antonio in late December 2019.


Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
Important raw materials purchased in 20192022 for each of the Company’s reportable segments are listed below.
Engine ProductsFastening SystemsEngineered Products and ForgingsStructuresGlobal Rolled ProductsForged Wheels
Alloying materialsCeramicsAlloying materialsAluminum AlloysEnergyEnergy
CobaltEnergyNickel AlloysPrimary and Scrap Aluminum coil
ElectricityEnergyAluminum scrap
Natural gasNickel Alloys and Stainless SteelsCoatingsPrimary Aluminum
Nickel alloysElectricitySteelsTitanium Scrap
Primary aluminum (ingot, billet, P1020, high purity)PlatinumLube oil
Stainless steelTitanium AlloysNatural gas
SteelTitanium SpongePackaging materials
Titanium alloysPaint/Coating
Titanium spongePrimary aluminum (ingot, slab, billet, P1020, high purity)
Vanadium AlloysResin
Steam

Generally, otherraw materials are purchased from third-party suppliers under competitively priced supply contracts or bidding arrangements. The Company believes that the raw materials necessary to its business are and will continue to be available.
Patents, Trade Secrets and Trademarks
The Company believes that its domestic and international patent, trade secret and trademark assets provide it with a significant competitive advantage. The Company’s rights under its patents, as well as the products made and sold under them, are important to the Company as a whole and, to varying degrees, important to each business segment. The patents owned by ArconicHowmet generally concern metal alloys, particular products, manufacturing equipment or techniques. Arconic’sHowmet’s business as a whole is not, however, materially dependent on any single patent, trade secret or trademark. As a result of product development and technological advancement, the Company continues to pursue patent protection in jurisdictions throughout the world. As of the end of 2019,2022, the Company’s worldwide patent portfolio consists of approximately 1,635938 granted patents (1,004 EP&F patents and 631 GRP patents) and 538205 pending patent applications (284 EP&F patent applications and 254 GRP patent applications).applications.
The Company also has a significant number of trade secrets, mostly regarding manufacturing processes and material compositions that give many of its businesses important advantages in their markets. The Company continues to strive to improve those processes and generate new material compositions that provide additional benefits. With respect to domestic and international registered trademarks, the Company has many that have significant recognition within the markets that are served. Examples include the name “Arconic” and the Arconic symbol for aluminum, nickel, and titanium products, Howmet® metal castings, Huck® fasteners, Kawneer® building panels and Dura-Bright® wheels with easy-clean surface treatments. A significant trademark filing campaign for the names “Howmet” and “Howmet Aerospace” along with its “H” logo was initiated in 2019, in support of the corporate launch of Howmet Aerospace Inc. As of the end of 2019,2022, the Company’s worldwide trademark portfolio consists of approximately 2,0661,569 registered trademarks (1,450 EP&F trademarks and 616 GRP trademarks) and 81894 pending trademark applications (361 EP&F trademark applications and 457 GRP trademark applications).applications. The Company’s rights under its trademarks are important to the Company as a whole and, to varying degrees, important to each business segment.
Competitive Conditions
EngineeredThe Company’s segments - Engine Products, and Forgings (EP&F)
EP&F’s business units - Fastening Systems, Engine Products, Engineered Structures, and Forged Wheels - are subject to substantial and intense competition in the markets they serve. Although ArconicHowmet believes its advanced technology, manufacturing processes and experience provide advantages to Arconic’sHowmet’s customers, such as high quality and superior mechanical properties that meet the Company’s customers’ most stringent requirements, many of the products ArconicHowmet makes can be produced by competitors using similar types of manufacturing processes as well as alternative forms of manufacturing. Despite intense competition, ArconicHowmet continues as a market leader in most of its principal markets. SeveralWe believe that factors including Arconic’s legacy of technical innovation,such as Howmet’s technological expertise, state-of-the-art capabilities, capacity, quality, engaged employees and long-standing customer relationships enable the Company to maintain its competitive position.
Principal competitors in the EP&F segment include Berkshire Hathaway Inc., through its 2016 acquisition of Precision Castparts Corporation and subsidiaries, for titanium and titanium-based alloys, precision forgings, seamless rolled rings,

investment castings, including airfoils, and aerospace fasteners; VSMPO (Russia) for titanium and titanium-based alloys and precision forgings; theAllegheny Technologies, Inc.’s High-Performance Materials & Components segment of Allegheny Technologies, Inc. (ATI) for titanium and titanium-based alloys and precision forgings, and investment castings;forgings; Lisi Aerospace (France) for aerospace fasteners; and Aubert & Duval (part of Eramet Group in France) for precision forgings. Other competitors include Doncasters Group Ltd. (U.K.) and Consolidated Precision Products Corp. (owned by Warburg Pincus and Berkshire Partners) for investment castings; Weber Metals (part of Otto Fuchs) for precision forgings; and Forgital and Frisa (Mexico) for seamless rings.
In the forged aluminum wheels business, Forged Wheels competes against steelaluminum and aluminumsteel wheel suppliers in the commercial transportation industry under the product brand name Alcoa® Wheels for the major regions that it serves (Americas,(North America, Europe, Japan, China, South America, and Australia). Its larger aluminum wheel competitors are Accuride Corporation, Speedline (member of the Ronal Group), Nippon Steel Corporation, Dicastal, Alux, and Wheels India Limited. In recent years, Forged Wheels has seen an increase in the number of aluminum wheel suppliers (both forged and cast aluminum wheels) from China, Taiwan, India and South Korea attempting to penetrate the global commercial transportation market.
Other competitors for EP&F include:
6
Doncasters Group Ltd. (UK) - investment castings

Consolidated Precision Products Corp., owned by Warburg Pincus - investment castings
Forgital - seamless rings
Frisa (Mexico) - seamless rings
Several of Arconic’sHowmet’s largest customers have captive superalloy furnaces for producing airfoil investment castings for their own use. Many other companies around the world also produce superalloy investment castings, and some of these companies currently compete with ArconicHowmet in the aerospace and other markets, while others are capable of competing with the Company should they choose to do so.
International competition in the investment castings,, fasteners, rings and forgings markets may also increase in the future as a result of strategic alliances among engine original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)(“OEMs”), aero-structure prime contractors, and overseas companies, especially in developing markets, particularly where “offset” or “local content” requirements create purchase obligations with respect to products manufactured in or directed to a particular country.
Global Rolled Products (GRP)Government Regulations and Environmental Matters
Rolled Products
Arconic’s Rolled Products business unit is one of the leaders in many of the aluminum flat rolled markets in which it participates, including ground transportation (including brazing sheet), aerospace, industrialOur operations and packaging markets. While Rolled Products participates in markets where Arconic believes it has a significant competitive advantage due to customer intimacy, advanced manufacturing capability, unique technology and/or differentiated products, in certain cases, our competitors are capable of making products similar to Arconic’s products. We continuously work to maintain and enhance our competitive position through innovation: new alloys such as aluminum lithium aerospace alloys, differentiated products such as our 5-layer brazing products and break-through processes such as A951™ bonding technology.
Some of Arconic’s Rolled Products marketsactivities are global and some are more regionally focused. Participationsubject to various federal, state, local, and foreign laws, rules and regulations, including those relating to the environment. In 2022, compliance with these laws, rules and regulations did not have a material effect on our capital expenditures, results of operations or competitive position. Additionally, we do not currently anticipate material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in these segments by competitors varies.2023. For example, Novelis is the largest flat rolled products producer competing in automotive, but it does not participate in the aerospace market. On the other hand, Kaiser participates in aerospace, but does not participate in the automotive sheet market. Other competitors include Aleris, AMAG, Constellium, Hydro, Kobe, Nanshan, and UACJ.
Additionally, there are a number of new competitors emerging, particularly in China and other developing economies. Arconic expects that this competitive pressure will continue and increase in the future as customers seek to globalize their supply bases in order to reduce costs.

List of Major Competitors for Rolled Products:
Aleris
AMAG (Austria)
Constellium (Netherlands)
Granges (Sweden)
Hydro (Norway)
Kaiser Aluminum
Kobe (Japan)
Nanshan (China)
Novelis
UACJ (Japan)
Aluminum Extrusions
The Aluminum Extrusions business unit is a leader in manydiscussion of the markets in which it participates, including aerospace, automotive (including driveshafts)risks associated with certain applicable laws and industrial markets. While Aluminum Extrusions participates in markets where Arconic believes we have a significant competitive position due to customer intimacy, advanced manufacturing capability, unique technology and/or differentiated products, in certain cases, our competitors are capable of making products similar to Arconic’s products. We continuously work to maintain and enhance our competitive position through innovation: new alloys such as aluminum lithium aerospace alloys and differentiated products.
Some of Arconic’s Aluminum Extrusions markets are worldwide and some are more regionally focused. Participation in these segments by competitors varies. For example, UAC is the largest competitor in aerospace extrusions, but it does not participate in the drawn tubing market. On the other hand, Unna participates in drawn tubing, but they do not compete in extrusions. Other competitors include Kaiser, Constellium, Otto Fuchs, Taber, Ye Fong, and Impol.
Additionally, there are a number of other competitors emerging, particularly in China and other developing economies. We expect that this competitive pressure will continue and increase in the future as customers seek to globalize their supply bases in order to reduce costs.
List of Major Competitors for Aluminum Extrusions:
Constellium (France)​
Impol (Poland)​
Kaiser​
Otto Fuchs (Germany)​
Taber​
UAC (USA/Romania)​
Unna (Germany)​
Ye Fong (Taiwan)
BCS
In North America, Arconic’s BCS business unit primarily competes in the nonresidential building segment. In Europe, it competes in both the residential and the nonresidential building segments. Arconic’s competitive advantage is based on strong brands, innovative products, customer intimacy and technical services.
In the architectural systems market, Arconic competes with regional competitors like Apogee, YKK, and Oldcastle in North America and Schüco, Hydro/SAPA and Reynaers in Europe. The competitive landscape in the architectural systems market has been relatively stable since the mid-2000s, with the major competitors in North America and Europe remaining constant, despite some industry consolidation in North America during the late 2000s.
The primary product categories in architectural products are aluminum composite material and coil coated sheet. The architectural products business is a more global market and is primarily served by subsidiaries of larger companies like Alpolic (Mitsubishi Corporation), Alucobond (Schweiter Technologies) and Novelis (Aditya Birla Group).

List of Major Competitors for Architectural Systems:
North America - Apogee, Oldcastle and YKK
Europe - Schüco (Germany), Hydro/SAPA (Norway), Reynaers (Belgium) and Corialis (Belgium)
List of Major Competitors for Architectural Products:
Composite Material - Alucobond (Switzerland), Alucoil (Spain) and Alpolic (Japan)​
Coil Coated Sheet - Euramax, Novelis and Hydro (Norway)
Environmental Matters
regulations, see “Risk Factors.” Information relating to environmental matters is included in Note VT to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8under the caption “Environmental Matters.” Approved
Human Capital
To attract, recruit, develop and retain world-class talent, the Company has created a culture that embraces diversity, drives inclusion, and empowers and engages our employees. Our Code of Conduct describes how we lead with integrity and work with one another while supporting our stakeholders. The Company provides competitive wages, benefits and terms of employment.
Attracting and recruiting candidates through workforce planning, increased hiring efficiency and effective onboarding has been a priority for the Company. The Company’s new Applicant Tracking System supports the dissemination of our job vacancies to a wider range of diverse partners. As an example, our campus recruitment platform provides an ability to proactively reach a broad talent network as the system of record for more than 9.2 million students and 1,300 schools across the United States. To retain new talent, the Company offers an onboarding program to develop a sense of belonging, teamwork and productivity that is uniform across the organization.
The Company enables our employees to own their development and create rewarding careers that draw on their aptitudes and support their ambitions. Using a human capital expendituresmanagement platform, employees can build a professional profile to share their career aspirations and learn new skills. This platform allows us to align employee goals and growth with the Company’s future business needs so that we can pinpoint potential successor candidates and build their readiness for new or expanded facilitiestheir future roles. Our talent review and succession planning process is an ongoing priority and is sponsored and led by our CEO with oversight by the Board of Directors.
We have started to use a data-driven approach to track how our employees are progressing through our organization. We seek to identify high performers and support their development into potential future leaders, with a particular focus on providing equitable opportunities to individuals who are members of underrepresented groups. Our Employee Resource Groups continue to be fundamental to building our culture of inclusion. Focusing on Gender, LGBTQ+, African Heritage, Hispanic, Veteran, European and Next Generation, these networks provide colleagues with valuable support and advice, create development opportunities, and provide leadership with feedback that raises awareness of issues and challenges. The Company also provides diversity awareness training and resources. Our Board of Directors and Executive Leadership team review diversity, equity and inclusion activity on a regular basis, and have been actively involved in ‘Meet the Leader’ sessions with our employees throughout the year.
Howmet’s strong health and safety culture empowers our employees and contractors to take personal responsibility for environmental control are $14 milliontheir actions and the safety of their coworkers. This culture is supported by internal policies, standards, rules and procedures that clearly articulate our stringent requirements for 2020working safely in all of our worldwide facilities. The Company embeds annual health and estimated expenditures for such purposes are $15million for 2021.safety goals and objectives into its operating plans to progress against our ultimate goal of zero incidents. We prioritize our risk management processes toward the prevention of fatality and serious injury.
Employees
Total worldwide employment at the end of 20192022 was approximately 41,70021,400 employees in 2823 countries. Many, but less than 50%,
Within the United States, there are eight collective bargaining agreements with varying expiration dates between Howmet and various labor unions. Of these eight, the largest workforce covered under a collective bargaining agreement is between Howmet and the United Autoworkers (“UAW”) at our Whitehall, Michigan location. This covers approximately 1,300 employees; the current agreement expires on March 31, 2023. The Whitehall, Michigan location has been preparing for the expiration of thesethis collective bargaining agreement over the course of several months and has started negotiations with the union prior to the
7


agreement’s expiration date. In addition to the employees covered by the Whitehall UAW collective bargaining agreement, approximately 1,700 other employees in the United States are also represented by labor unions. The Company believes that relations with its employees and any applicable union representatives generally are good.
In the United States, the largest collective bargaining agreement is the master collective bargaining agreement between Arconic and the United Steelworkers (USW). The USW master agreement covers approximately 3,000 employees at fourU.S. locations; the current labor agreement expires on May 15, 2022. There are 17 other collective bargaining agreements in the United States with varying expiration dates, including those in the master agreement.
On a regional basis, collective bargaining agreements with varying expiration dates cover employees in Europe, and Russia, North America, South America, and Asia. The Company believes that it has positive relationships with its employees and any respective labor union representatives.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The names, ages, positions and areas of responsibility of the executive officers of the Company as of February 26, 202014, 2023 are listed below. The Company’s executive officers are annually elected or appointed to serve until the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors (held in conjunction with the annual meeting of shareholders), except in the case of earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal.
Michael N. Chanatry, 62, Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer. Mr. Chanatry was initially elected Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer of Howmet effective May 16, 2018. Prior to joining Howmet, from 2015 to April 2018, he was Vice President of Supply Chain for General Electric’s Power Division. Mr. Chanatry served as General Manager of Supply Chain for General Electric Appliances from 2013 to 2015; and General Electric Aviation Systems from 2009 to 2013. Prior to his leadership roles at General Electric Power, General Electric Appliances and General Electric Aviation Systems, Mr. Chanatry held numerous positions within the General Electric Aviation & Aerospace divisions, as well as at Lockheed Martin from 1983 to 2009.
Ken Giacobbe, 54,57, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Giacobbe was initially elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ArconicHowmet effective November 1, 2016. Mr. Giacobbe joined ArconicHowmet in 2004 as Vice President of Finance for Global Extruded Products, part of Alcoa Forgings and Extrusions. He then served as Vice President of Finance for the Company’s Building and Construction Systems business from 2008 until 2011. In 2011, he assumed the role of Group Controller for the Engineered Products and ForgingsSolutions segment. From January 2013 until October 2016, Mr. Giacobbe served as Chief Financial Officer of the Engineered Products and ForgingsSolutions segment. Before joining Arconic,Howmet, Mr. Giacobbe held senior finance roles at Avaya and Lucent Technologies.
Lola F. Lin, 48, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and Secretary. Ms. Lin was initially elected Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Howmet effective June 28, 2021. Prior to joining Howmet, she served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Airgas, Inc. from 2016 to May 2021. Prior to her time at Airgas, Ms. Lin held various legal roles at Air Liquide USA LLC from 2007 to 2016, including as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel. Prior to her roles at Airgas Inc. and Air Liquide, Ms. Lin held roles at Dell Inc., Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP and Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP.
Neil E. Marchuk, 62,65, Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources.Resources Officer and Interim President, Fastening Systems. Mr. Marchuk was initially elected to his current positionExecutive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Howmet effective March 1, 2019. Prior to joining Arconic,Howmet, from January 2016 to February 2019, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer at Adient, an automotive manufacturer. From July 2006 to May 2015, Mr. Marchuk was Executive Vice President of Human Resource at TRW Automotive, and served as TRW’s Vice President, Human Resources from September 2004 to July 2006. 2006. Prior to joining TRW, from December 2001 to August 2004, Mr. Marchuk was Director, Corporate Human Resources for E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company (“E.I. Du Pont”). From September 1999 to November 2001, Mr. Marchuk was Director, Global HR Delivery for E.I. Du Pont. From February 1999 to August 1999, Mr. Marchuk served E.I. Du Pont as its Global HR Director, Global Services Division.
Timothy D. Myers, 54, Executive Vice President and Group President, Global Rolled Products. Mr. Myers has served as Executive Vice President and Group President, Global Rolled Products, which now includes Arconic's Extrusions and Building and Construction Systems businesses, since October 2017. From May 2016 to June 2019, he served as Executive Vice President and Group President of Arconic's Transportation and Construction Solutions segment, which then comprised Arconic Wheel and Transportation Products and Building and Construction Systems and which segment was eliminated in the third quarter of 2019, with the Building and Construction Systems business then moved to the Global Rolled Products segment. Prior to that assignment, he was President of Alcoa Wheel and Transportation Products, from June 2009 to May 2016. Mr. Myers was Vice President and General Manager, Commercial Vehicle Wheels for the Alcoa Wheel Products business from January 2006 to June 2009. Mr. Myers joined Arconic in 1991 as an automotive applications engineer in the Commercial Rolled Products Division, and held a series of engineering, marketing, sales and management positions with the Company since that time.
Paul Myron, 53, Vice President and Controller. Mr. Myron was elected Vice President and Controller of Arconic effective November 1, 2016. Mr. Myron joined Arconic as a systems analyst in Pittsburgh and in 1992 relocated to the Company’s

Davenport, Iowa facility as a product accountant. He served in numerous financial management positions from 1995 until 2000 when he was named Commercial Manager and Controller for the Atlantic division of the Alcoa World Alumina and Chemicals business. In 2002, Mr. Myron was appointed Vice President of Finance, Alcoa Primary Metals and later became Vice President of Finance, Alcoa World Alumina and Chemicals. In 2005 Mr. Myron was named Director of Financial Planning and Analysis, accountable for Arconic’s financial planning, analysis, and reporting worldwide. In February 2012, he became Director of Finance Initiatives for the Engineered Products and Forgings segment, overseeing specific financial initiatives and projects within the group. From July 2012 until his most recent appointment, Mr. Myron served as Vice President, Finance and Business Excellence for the Arconic Power and Propulsion business.
John C. Plant, 66,69, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Plant was appointed Howmet’s Chief Executive Officer effective October 14, 2021, and was Co-Chief Executive Officer from April 2020 to October 2021. From February 2019 to April 2020, he was the Chief Executive Officer of Arconic effective February 6, 2019.Inc., as the Company was then known prior to its separation. He has served as Arconic's Chairmanchairman of Howmet's Board of Directors since October 2017 and as a member of the Board since February 2016. Mr. Plant previously served as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of TRW Automotive from 2011 to 2015, and as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 2003 to 2011. TRW Automotive was acquired by ZF Friedrichshafen AG in May 2015. Mr. Plant was a co-member of the Chief Executive Office of TRW Inc. from 2001 to 2003 and an Executive Vice President of TRW from 1999 (when the company's 1999 acquisition ofcompany acquired Lucas VarityVarity) to 2003. Prior to TRW, Mr. Plant was President of Lucas Varity Automotive and managing director of the Electrical and Electronics division from 1991 through 1997.
Katherine H. RamundoBarbara L. Shultz, 52, Executive49, Vice President Chief Legal Officer and Secretary.Controller. Ms. RamundoShultz was initially elected Vice President and Controller of Howmet effective May 25, 2021. Ms. Shultz joined Howmet in 2005 and served in numerous financial accounting positions until 2012 when she was appointed Director of Finance for the Company’s Alcoa Wheel and Transportation Products business. She then served as Director of Compliance for the Company’s then Structures business from July 2015 to her current position effective November 1, 2016.February 2019, Director of Compliance from February 2019 to June 2020, and Assistant Controller from June 2020 to May 2021. Prior to joining Arconic,Howmet, Ms. Shultz held several roles at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from January 2013 through August 2015, she was Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary1995 to 2005.
8


The Company’s executive officers are elected or appointed to serve until the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors (held in conjunction with the annual meeting of shareholders) except in the case of earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Arconic’sHowmet’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be impacted by a number of factors. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this report, the following risks and uncertainties could materially harm itsthe Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows, including causing Arconic’sits actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. The following list of significant risk factors is not all-inclusive or necessarily in order of importance. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to ArconicHowmet or that ArconicHowmet currently deems immaterial also may materiallyalso adversely affect the Company materially in future periods.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
The markets for Arconic’sHowmet’s products are highly cyclical, and such markets and Howmet’s operationsare influenced by a number of factors, including global economic conditions.
ArconicHowmet is subject to cyclical fluctuations in global economic conditions and lightweight metals end-use markets. ArconicHowmet sells many products to industries that are cyclical, such as the aerospace automotive,and commercial transportation and building and construction industries, and the demand for itsour products is sensitive to, and quickly impacted by, demand for the finished goods manufactured by itsour customers in these industries, which may change as a result of changes in regional or worldwide economies, currency exchange rates, interest rates, inflation, energy prices or other factors beyond itsour control.
In particular, Arconicaddition, Howmet derives a significant portion of itsour revenue from products sold to the aerospace industry, which can be highlyis cyclical and reflective of changes in the general economy. The commercial aerospace industry is historically driven by the demand from commercial airlines for new aircraft. The U.S.aircraft and international commercial aviation industries may face challenges arising from competitive pressures and fuel costs.spare parts. Demand for commercial aircraft and spare parts is influenced by airline industry profitability, trends in airline passenger traffic domestically and globally, the state of U.S., regional and world economies, the ability of aircraft purchasers to obtain required financing and numerous other factors including the effects of terrorism, health and safety concerns, environmental constraints imposed upon aircraft operators, the retirement of older aircraft, the performance and cost of alternative materials, and technological improvements to aircraft.factors. The militarydefense aerospace cycle is highly dependent on U.S. and foreign government funding; however,and, it is also driven by the effects of terrorism, a changing global politicalgeopolitical environment, U.S. foreign policy, the retirement ofwhether older military aircraft are retired, and technological improvements to new engines.
engines and airframes. Further, the demand for Arconic’s automotive and groundHowmet’s commercial transportation products is driven by the number of vehicles produced by automotive and commercial transportation manufacturers and volume of aluminum content per vehicle. The automotive industry is sensitive to general economic conditions, including credit markets and interest rates, and consumer spending and

preferences regarding vehicle ownership and usage, vehicle size, configuration and features. Automotive and commercialmanufacturers. Commercial transportation sales and production can also beare affected by othermany factors, including the age of the vehicle fleet, and related scrappage rates, labor relations issues, fuel prices, regulatory requirements, government initiatives, trade agreements, and levels of competition both withincompetition.
The ongoing conflict between Russia and outsideUkraine has impacted global energy markets, particularly in Europe, leading to high volatility and increasing prices for crude oil, natural gas and other energy supplies. Higher energy costs result in increases in operating expenses at our manufacturing facilities, in the expense of shipping raw materials to our facilities, and in the expense of shipping products to our customers. The costs of certain raw materials (including, but not limited to, nickel, titanium, aluminum, industry.cobalt, and rhenium) necessary for the manufacture of Howmet’s products and other manufacturing and operating costs are influenced by market forces and governmental constraints, including inflation, supply and demand, and shortages, and could be further influenced by export limits, sanctions, new or increased import duties, and countervailing or anti-dumping duties. Recent high levels of inflation worldwide and in the United States has resulted in an increase in the costs of materials and labor. While we generally attempt to pass along higher raw material and energy costs to our customers through contractual agreements in the form of price increases, there can be a delay between an increase in our costs and our ability to increase the prices of our products. Additionally, we may not be able to increase the prices of our products due to competitive pricing pressure and other factors. If the Company is unable to offset significant cost increases through customer price increases, productivity improvements, cost reduction or other programs, Howmet’s business, operating results or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
ArconicHowmet is unable to predict the future course of industry variables, the strength of the U.S., regional or global economies, or the effects of government actions. Negative economic conditions, such as a major economic downturn a prolonged recovery period,or recession, continued inflation, or disruptions in the financial markets, could have a material adverse effect on Arconic’sHowmet’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Arconic facesA material disruption of, or manufacturing difficulties at, Howmet’s manufacturing operations could adversely affect Howmet’s business.
If Howmet’s operations, particularly one of its key manufacturing facilities, were to be disrupted, including because of significant competition, whichequipment failures, natural disasters, power outages, fires, explosions, terrorism, theft, sabotage, adverse weather conditions, public health crises, labor disputes, labor shortages or other reasons, Howmet may be unable to effectively meet its obligations to, or demand from, its customers. In addition, the manufacture of many of Howmet’s products is a complex process. Manufacturing problems arising from equipment failure or malfunction, inadvertent failure to follow regulatory or customer specifications and procedures, including those related to quality or safety, and problems with raw materials could have an adverse impact on the Company’s ability to fulfill orders or meet product quality or performance requirements, which may result in negative publicity and damage to our reputation, adversely impacting product demand and customer relationships. Interruptions in production capability could increase Howmet’s costs and reduce its sales, including causing the Company to
9


incur costs for premium freight, make substantial capital expenditures, or purchase alternative material at higher costs to fulfill customer orders. Additionally, a delivery delay by us due to production interruptions could subject us to liability from customer claims that such delay resulted in losses to the customer. Furthermore, product manufacturing or performance issues could result in recalls, customer penalties, contract cancellation and product liability exposure in addition to a material adverse effect on profitability.
As discussed in Part I, Item 1. (Business-Competitive Conditions) of this report, the markets for Arconic’s products are highly competitive. Arconic’s competitors include a variety of both U.S. and non-U.S. companies in all major markets. New product offerings, new technologies in the marketplace or new facilities may compete with or replace Arconic products. The willingness of customers to accept substitutes for the products sold by Arconic, the ability of large customers to exert leverage in the marketplace to affect the pricing for Arconic’s products, and technological advancements or other developments by or affecting Arconic’s competitors or customers could adversely affect Arconic’sour business, financial condition or results of operations. Because of approval, license and qualification requirements applicable to manufacturers and/or their suppliers, sources of alternatives to mitigate manufacturing disruptions may not be readily available to Howmet or its customers.
In addition, Arconic may face increased competition dueHowmet is dependent on a limited number of suppliers for materials and services essential to industry consolidation. As companies attempt to strengthen or maintain their market positions in an evolving industry, companies could be acquired or merged. Companies that are strategic alliance partners in some areas of Arconic’s business may acquire or form alliances with Arconic’s competitors, thereby reducing their business with Arconic. Industry consolidation may result in stronger competitors who are better able to obtain favorable terms from suppliers or who are better able to compete as sole-source vendors for customers. Consolidation within Arconic’s customer base may result in customers who are better able to command increased leverage in negotiating pricesour operations, including raw materials, and other terms of sale, which could adversely affect Arconic’s profitability. Moreover, if, as a result of increased leverage, customers require Arconic to reduce its pricing such that its gross margins are diminished, Arconic could decide not to sell certain products to a particular customer, or not to sell certain products at all, which would decrease Arconic’s revenue. Consolidation within Arconic’s customer base may also lead to reduced demand for Arconic’s products, a combined entity replacing Arconic’s products with those of Arconic’s competitors and cancellations of orders. The result of these developmentssupply chain disruptions could have a material adverse effect on Arconic’sour business.
Howmet has supply arrangements with suppliers for various materials and services, including raw materials. We maintain annual or long-term contracts for a majority of our supply requirements, and, for the remainder, we depend on spot purchases. There can be no assurance that we will be able to renew, or obtain replacements for, any of our long-term contracts when they expire on terms that are as favorable as our existing agreements, or at all. For certain raw materials and services, we depend on a number of limited source or sole source suppliers. Supply constraints could impact our production or force us to purchase materials and other supplies from alternative sources, which may not be available in sufficient quantities or at prices that are favorable to us. Howmet could also have exposure if a key supplier is unable to deliver sufficient quantities of a necessary material on a timely basis. Several of our suppliers have recently had constraints on their ability to supply Howmet with its full requirements due to lack of capacity, labor shortages and/or material availability. If such constraints continue or escalate, it could result in an adverse impact on our business. Because of approval, license and qualification requirements applicable to manufacturers and/or their suppliers, sources of alternatives to mitigate supply disruptions may not be readily available to Howmet. Any delay in supply from these suppliers could prevent us from meeting customer demand for our products. The availability and costs of certain raw materials necessary for the production of Howmet’s products may also be influenced by private or government entities, including as a result of changes in geopolitical conditions or regulatory requirements, labor relations between the producers and their work forces, and unstable governments in exporting nations. Any of the foregoing supply chain disruptions or those due to trade barriers, business continuity, quality, cyberattacks, transportation, delivery or logistics challenges, weather, natural disaster, or pandemic events could adversely affect Howmet’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
Howmet’s business depends, in part, on its ability to successfully meet program demand, production targets and commitments.
Howmet is currently under contract to supply components for a number of existing and new commercial, general aviation, military aircraft and aircraft engine programs. Many of these contracts contemplate production increases over the next several years. If Howmet fails to meet production targets and commitments, or encounters difficulty or unexpected costs in meeting such levels, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s reputation, business, operating results andor financial condition. Similarly, to the extent demand for our products increases rapidly and significantly in future periods, we may not be able to ramp up production quickly enough to meet the demand, which could result in lost opportunities for growth and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or competitive position.
ArconicFailure to attract and retain a qualified workforce and key personnel or to provide adequate succession planning could adversely affect Howmet’s operations and competitiveness.
Howmet’s global operations require qualified and skilled personnel with relevant industry and technical experience. Shortages in certain skills, in areas such as engineering, manufacturing and technology, and other labor market inadequacies have created more competition for talent. A sustained labor shortage, lack of skilled labor, increased turnover, labor inflation, or increase in general labor costs could lead to higher labor, recruiting or training costs to attract and retain personnel. If the Company fails to attract, train, develop and retain a global workforce with the skills and in the locations we need to operate and grow our business, our business and operations could be adversely impacted. Furthermore, the continuity of key personnel and the preservation of institutional knowledge are vital to the success of the Company’s growth and business strategy. The loss of key personnel could significantly harm Howmet’s business, and any unplanned turnover or failure to develop adequate succession plans for key positions could deplete the Company’s institutional knowledge base, result in loss of technical or other expertise, delay or impede the execution of the Company’s business plans and erode Howmet’s competitiveness.
Howmet could be adversely affected by the loss of key customers or significant changes in the business or financial condition or the loss of a significant customer orits customers.
ArconicHowmet has long-term contracts with a significant number of its customers, some of which are subject to renewal, renegotiation or re-pricing at periodic intervals or upon changes in competitive supply conditions. Arconic’sHowmet’s failure to successfully renew, renegotiate or favorably re-price such agreements, or a material deterioration in or termination of these customer relationships, could result in a reduction or loss in customer purchase volume or revenue.
Additionally, a significant downturn or deterioration in the business or financial condition or loss of a key customer supplied by ArconicHowmet could adversely affect Arconic’sHowmet’s financial results. Arconic’s Howmet’s
10


customers may experience delays in the launch of new products, labor strikes, diminished liquidity or credit unavailability, weak demand for their products, supply chain constraints or other difficulties in their businesses. For example, our sales were negatively affected by Boeing’s pause in 2019, Boeing announceddeliveries of its 787 aircraft from May 2021 through 2022 as a temporary reduction in the production rate of, and subsequently announced a temporary suspension of production of, the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, which has resulted in, and is expected to continue to result in, a reduction in sales of aluminum sheet and plate and other products that Arconic produces for Boeing airplanes. As no firm timeline has been established for either the adjustment of Boeing’s manufacturing plans, or for returning the aircraft into service, we are currently unable to definitively quantify any such potential impact.
Arconic’ssignificantly reduced 787 production rates. Howmet’s customers may also change their business strategies or modify their business relationships with Arconic,Howmet, including to reduce the amount of Arconic’sHowmet’s products they purchase, or to switch to alternative suppliers.suppliers, or to enter into the markets themselves to compete with Howmet. If Arconic’sHowmet’s customers reduce, terminate or delay purchases from ArconicHowmet due to the foregoing factors or otherwise and ArconicHowmet is unsuccessful in enforcing its contract rights or replacing such business in whole or in part or replaces it with less profitable business, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Arconic could encounter manufacturing difficulties or other issues that impact product performance, quality or safety, which could affect Arconic’s reputation, business and financial statements.
The manufacture of many of Arconic’sHowmet’s products is a highly exacting and complex process. Problems may arise during manufacturing forare used in a variety of reasons,military applications, including equipment malfunction, failure to follow specific protocols, specificationsmilitary aircraft. Although many of the military programs in which Howmet participates extend several years, changes in military strategy, policy and procedures, including those related to qualitypriorities, or safety, problems with raw materials, supply chain interruptions, natural disasters, labor unrestreductions in defense spending, may affect current and environmental factors. Such problems could have an adverse impact on the Company’s ability to fulfill orders or on product quality or on performance. Product manufacturing or performance issues could result in recalls, customer penalties, contract cancellation and product liability exposure. Because of approval, license and qualification

requirements applicable to manufacturers and/or their suppliers, alternatives to mitigate manufacturing disruptions may not be readily available to Arconic or its customers. Accordingly, manufacturing problems, product defects or other risks associated with our products, could result in significant costs to and liability for us that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, including the payment of potentially substantial monetary damages, fines or penalties, as well as negative publicity and damage to our reputation, which could adversely impact product demand and customer relationships.
Arconic’s business depends, in part, on its ability to meet increased program demand successfully and to mitigate the impact of program cancellations, reductions and delays.
Arconic is currently under contract to supply components for a number of new and existing commercial, general aviation, military aircraft and aircraft engine programs as well as aluminum sheet and extrusions for a number of aluminum-intensive automotive vehicle programs. Manyfuture funding of these programs are scheduled for production increases over the next several years. If Arconic fails to meet production levels or encounters difficulty or unexpected costs in meeting such levels, itand could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, program cancellations, reductions or delays could also have a material adverse effect on Arconic’s business.
Product liability, product safety, personal injury, property damage, and recall claims and investigations may materially affect Arconic’s financial condition and damage Arconic’s reputation.
The manufacture and sale of our products exposes Arconic to potential product liability, personal injury, property damage and related claims. These claims may arise from failure to meet product specifications, design flaws in our products, malfunction of our products, misuse of our products, use of our products in an unintended, unapproved or unrecommended manner, or use of our products with systems not manufactured or sold by us. New data and information, including information about the ways in which Arconic’s products are used, may lead Arconic, regulatory authorities, government agencies or other entities or organizations to publish guidelines or recommendations, or impose restrictions, related to the manufacturing or use of Arconic’s products.
In the event that an Arconic product fails to perform as expected, regardless of fault, or is used in an unexpected manner, and such failure or use results in, or is alleged to result in, bodily injury and/or property damage or other losses, Arconic may be subject to product liability lawsuits and other claims, or may be required or requested by its customers to participate in a recall or other corrective action involving such product. In addition, if an Arconic product is perceived to be defective or unsafe, sales of Arconic’s products could be diminished, Arconic’s reputation could be adversely impacted and Arconic could be subject to further liability claims. Moreover, events that give rise to actual, potential or perceived product safety concerns could expose Arconic to government investigations or regulatory enforcement actions.
There can be no assurance that Arconic will be successful in defending any such proceedings or that insurance available to Arconic will be sufficient to cover any losses associated with such proceedings. An adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings or investigations could: (i) have a material adverse effect on Arconic’s business, financial condition or profitability; (ii) impose substantial monetary damages and/or non-monetary penalties; (iii) result in additional litigation, regulatory investigations or other proceedings involving Arconic; result in loss of customers; (iv) require changes to our products or business operations; or (v) damage Arconic’s reputation and/or negatively impact the market price of Arconic’s common stock. Even if Arconic successfully defends against these types of claims, Arconic could still be required to spend a substantial amount of money in connection with legal proceedings or investigations with respect to such claims; Arconic’s management could be required to devote significant time, attention and operational resources responding to and defending against these claims and responding to these investigations; and Arconic’s reputation could suffer. Product liability claims and related lawsuits and investigations, product recalls, and allegations of product safety or quality issues, regardless of their validity or ultimate outcome, may have a material adverse effect on Arconic’s business, financial condition and reputation and on our ability to attract and retain customers.
For further discussion of potential liability associated with some of our products, including proceedings and investigations relating to the June 13, 2017 fire at the Grenfell Tower in London, U.K., see Part I, Item 3. (Legal Proceedings) of this report.
Arconic’s global operations expose Arconic to risks that could adversely affect Arconic’s business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or the market price of its securities.
Arconic has operations or activities in numerous countries and regions outside the United States, including Europe, Canada, China, Japan and Russia. As a result, Arconic’s global operations are affected by economic, political and other conditions in the foreign countries in which Arconic does business as well as U.S. laws regulating international trade, including:
economic and commercial instability risks, including those caused by sovereign and private debt default, corruption, and changes in local government laws, regulations and policies, such as those related to tariffs, sanctions and trade barriers (including tariffs imposed by the United States as well as retaliatory tariffs imposed by China or other foreign entities), taxation, exchange controls, employment regulations and repatriation of assets or earnings;

geopolitical risks such as political instability, civil unrest, expropriation, nationalization of properties by a government, imposition of sanctions, and renegotiation or nullification of existing agreements;
war or terrorist activities;
kidnapping of personnel;
major public health issues such as an outbreak of a pandemic or epidemic (such as Sudden Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Avian Influenza, H7N9 virus, coronavirus (including the novel strain that surfaced in Wuhan, China in December 2019, which has resulted in travel restrictions and shutdown of certain businesses in the region), or the Ebola virus), which could cause disruptions in Arconic’s operations, workforce or supply chain;
difficulties enforcing contractual rights and intellectual property, including a lack of remedies for misappropriation in certain jurisdictions;
changes in trade and tax laws that may result in our customers being subjected to increased taxes, duties and tariffs and reduce their willingness to use our services in countries in which we are currently manufacturing their products;
rising labor costs;
labor unrest, including strikes;
compliance with antitrust and competition regulations;
compliance with foreign labor laws, which generally provide for increased notice, severance and consultation requirements compared to U.S. laws;
aggressive, selective or lax enforcement of laws and regulations by national governmental authorities;
compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery and corruption laws;
compliance with U.S. laws concerning trade, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the Export Administration Regulations, and the sanctions, regulations and embargoes administered by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control;
imposition of currency controls; and
adverse tax audit rulings,
Although the effect of any of the foregoing factors is difficult to predict, any one or more of them could adversely affect Arconic’s business, financial condition, or results of operations. The Company’s international operations subject Arconic to complex and dynamic laws and regulations that, in some cases, could result in conflict or inconsistency between applicable laws and/or legal obligations. While Arconic believes it has adopted appropriate risk management, compliance programs and insurance arrangements to address and reduce the associated risks, such measures may provide inadequate protection against costs, penalties, liabilities or other potential risks such as loss of export privileges or repatriation of assets that may arise from such events.
A material disruption of Arconic’s operations, particularly at one or more of the Company’s manufacturing facilities, could adversely affect Arconic’s business.
If Arconic’s operations, particularly one of the Company’s manufacturing facilities, were to be disrupted as a result of significant equipment failures, natural disasters, power outages, fires, explosions, terrorism, theft, sabotage, adverse weather conditions, public health crises, labor disputes or other reasons, Arconic may be unable to effectively meet its obligations to or demand from its customers,for Howmet’s products, which could adversely affect Arconic’s financial performance.
Interruptions in production could increase Arconic’s costs and reduce its sales. Any interruption in production capability could require the Company to incur costs for premium freight, make substantial capital expenditures or purchase alternative material at higher costs to fill customer orders, which could negatively affect Arconic’s profitability and financial condition. Furthermore, because customers may be dependent on planned deliveries from us, customers that have to reschedule their own production due to our delivery delays may be able to pursue financial claims against us, and we may incur costs to correct such problems in addition to any liability resulting from such claims. Arconic maintains property damage insurance that the Company believes to be adequate to provide for reconstruction of facilities and equipment, as well as business interruption insurance to mitigate losses resulting from significant production interruption or shutdown caused by an insured loss. However, any recovery under Arconic’s insurance policies may not offset the lost profits or increased costs that may be experienced during the disruption of operations, which could adversely affect Arconic’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

Arconic may be unable to realize future targets or goals established for its business segments, or complete projects, at the levels, projected costs or by the dates targeted.
From time to time, Arconic may announce future targets or goals for its business, which are based on the Company’s then current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the operating environment, economies and markets in which Arconic operates. Future targets and goals reflect the Company’s beliefs and assumptions and its perception of historical trends, then current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors appropriate in the circumstances. As such, targets and goals are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive and other uncertainties and contingencies regarding future events, including the risks discussed in this report. The actual outcome may be materially different. There can be no assurance that any targets or goals established by the Company will be accomplished at the levels or by the dates targeted, if at all. Failure to achieve the targets or goals by the Company may have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or the market price of its securities.
In addition, the implementation of Arconic’s business strategy periodically involves the entry into and the execution of complex projects, which place significant demands on the Company’s management and personnel, and may depend on numerous factors beyond the Company’s control. There can be no assurance that such projects will be completed within budgeted costs, on a timely basis, or at all, whether due to the risks described in this report, or other factors. The failure to complete a material project as planned, or a significant delay in a material project, whatever the cause, could have an adverse effect on Arconic’sHowmet’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Information technology system failures, cyber attackscyberattacks and security breaches may threaten the integrity of Arconic’sHowmet’s intellectual property and other sensitive information, disrupt its business operations, and result in reputational harm and other negative consequences that could havehaving a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
Arconic relies on itsHowmet’s information technology systems to manage and operate its business, process transactions, and summarize its operating results. Arconic’s information technology systems arecould be subject to damage or interruption from power outages,outages; computer network and telecommunications failures,failures; computer viruses, andviruses; catastrophic events, such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, acts of war or terrorism,terrorism; and usage errors by employees. If Arconic’sHowmet’s information technology systems are damaged or cease to function properly, the Company may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and ArconicHowmet may suffer loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in its operations. Any material disruption in the Company’s information technology systems, or delays or difficulties in implementing or integrating new systems or enhancing current systems, could have an adverse effect on Arconic’sHowmet’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Arconic also facesIncreased global cybersecurity vulnerabilities, threats which may range from uncoordinated individual attempts toand more sophisticated and targeted measures, known as advanced persistent threats, directed atcyberattacks pose a risk to the Company. Cyber attackssecurity of our and security breaches may include, but are not limited to, attempts to access information, computer viruses, denialour customers’, suppliers’ and third-party service providers’ products, systems and networks, and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of service and other electronic security breaches.
our data. The Company believes that it faces a heightened threatthreats of cyber attackscyberattacks due to the industries it serves, the locations of its operations, and its technological innovations. The Company has experienced cybersecurity attacks in the past, including breaches of its information technology systems in which information was taken, and may experience them in the future, potentially with more frequency or sophistication. Based on information known to date,Although past attacks havedid not hadresult in known losses of any critical data or have a material impact on Arconic’sHowmet’s financial condition or results of operations. However, due to the evolving nature of cybersecurity threats,operations, the scope and impact of any future incident cannot be predicted.
Arconic employs a number of measures to protect and defend against cyber attacks, including technical security controls, data encryption, firewalls, intrusion prevention systems, anti-virus software and frequent backups. Additionally, the Company conducts regular periodic training of its employees regarding the protection of sensitive information which includes training intended to prevent the success of “phishing” attacks. While the Company continually works to safeguard its systems and mitigate potential risks, there is no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to prevent cyber attackscyberattacks or security breaches that manipulate or improperly use itsthe Company’s systems or networks, compromise confidential, personal or otherwise protected information, destroy or corrupt data, block access to its systems, or otherwise disrupt its operations. The occurrence of such events could negatively impact Arconic’sHowmet’s reputation and its competitive position and could result in litigation with third parties, regulatory action, loss of business, potential liability and increased remediation costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. In addition, such attacks
Our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or breaches could require significant management attention and resources,cash flows have been and could result incontinue to be adversely impacted materially by the diminutioncontinued effects of the value ofCOVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic affecting the Company’s investment in researchglobal community has had and development.
Arconic’s enterprise risk management program and disclosure controls and procedures address cybersecurity and include elements intendedmay continue to ensure that there is an analysis of potential disclosure obligations arising from cyber attacks and security breaches. Arconic also maintains compliance programs to address the potential applicability of restrictions against trading while in possession of material, nonpublic information generally and in connection with a cyber attack or security breach.

However, a breakdown in existing controls and procedures around the Company’s cybersecurity environment may prevent Arconic from detecting, reporting or responding to cyber incidents in a timely manner and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows, and the Company’snature and extent of the impact over time remain uncertain. A sustained impact to our operations, financial results and market capitalization may require material impairments of our assets, including, but not limited to, goodwill and other intangible assets, long-lived assets, and right-of-use assets. The impact over time will depend on future developments that are beyond our control, including the duration of the pandemic, the continued severity of the virus, resurgences and emergence of variants of the virus, the efficacy and availability or uptake of vaccines and related drugs, and the actions that may be taken in response to COVID-19, such as travel limitations. For instance, the decrease in domestic and international air travel due to the pandemic adversely affected demand for narrow-body and wide-body aircraft. Although domestic air travel now approximates pre-pandemic levels, China domestic air travel is still below pre-pandemic 2019 levels on an average monthly basis in 2022. International travel also continues to be lower than pre-pandemic 2019 levels. We expect commercial aerospace growth to continue, with narrow-body demand returning faster than wide-body demand. The commercial wide-body aircraft market is taking longer to recover, which is creating a shift in our product mix compared to pre-pandemic conditions. In addition, several of our commercial aerospace and transportation customers have encountered, and may continue to encounter, challenges in their ability to increase production rates to meet demand due to labor and supply chain constraints stemming from the pandemic. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has or may continue to exacerbate other risks disclosed herein, including, but not limited to, risks related to global economic conditions, competition,
11


loss of customers, costs of supplies, supply chain disruptions, manufacturing difficulties and disruptions, investment returns, our credit profile, our credit ratings, and interest rates.
Howmet faces significant competition, which may have an adverse effect on profitability.
As discussed in “Competitive Conditions” in Part I, Item 1(Business) of this report, the markets for Howmet’s products are highly competitive. Howmet’s competitors include a variety of both U.S. and non-U.S. companies in our product markets, which could include existing customers. New entrants in our markets, new product offerings, new and/or emerging technologies in the marketplace, or new facilities may compete with or replace Howmet products. The willingness of customers to accept alternate solutions for the products sold by Howmet, pricing pressure from competitors, and technological advancements or other developments by or affecting Howmet’s competitors or customers could adversely affect Howmet’s business, financial condition or the market priceresults of its securities.
Arconic may be unable to develop innovative new products or implement technology initiatives successfully.
Arconic’soperations. Howmet’s competitive position and future performance depends, in part, on the Company’s ability to:
identifyto develop and evolve with emerging technologicalinnovate products, deploy technology initiatives and broader industry trends in Arconic’s target end-markets;
identify and successfully execute on a strategy to remain an essential and sustainable element of its customers’ supply chains;
fund, develop, manufacture and bring innovative new products and services to market quickly and cost-effectively;
monitor disruptive technologies and understand customers’ and competitors’ abilities to deploy those disruptive technologies; and
achieve sufficient return on investment for new products based on capital expenditures and research and development spending.
Arconic is working on new developments for a number of strategic projects, including advanced alloy development, engineered finishes and product design, rolling technology, and otherimplement advanced manufacturing technologies.
While ArconicHowmet intends to continue to develop innovative new products and services, it may not be able to successfully differentiate its products or services from those of its competitors or match the level of research and development spending of its competitors, including those developing technology to displace Arconic’s current products. In addition, Arconic may not be able to adapt to evolving markets and technologies or achieve and maintain technological advantages. There can be no assurance
In addition, Howmet may face increased competition due to industry consolidation. Companies that anyare strategic partners in some areas of Arconic’s newHowmet’s business may acquire or form alliances with Howmet’s competitors, thereby reducing their business with Howmet. Industry consolidation may result in stronger competitors who are better able to obtain favorable terms from suppliers or who are better able to compete as sole-source vendors for customers. Consolidation within Howmet’s customer base may result in customers who are better able to exert leverage in negotiating prices and other terms of sale, or may lead to reduced demand for Howmet’s products or services, development programs or technologies will be commercially adopted or beneficial to Arconic.
Arconic could be adversely affected by reductions in defense spending.
Arconic’s products are used inif a variety of military applications, including military aircraft and armored vehicles. Although many of the programs incombined entity replaces Howmet with a Howmet competitor with which Arconic participates extend several years, they are subject to annual funding through congressional appropriations. Changes in military strategy and priorities, or reductions in defense spending, may affect current and future fundingit had prior relationships. The result of these programscircumstances could have a material adverse effect on Howmet’s business, operating results and could reduce the demand for Arconic’s products, which could adversely affect Arconic’s business, financial condition or results of operations.condition.
Arconic may face challengesRisks Related to its intellectual property rights which could adversely affect the Company’s reputation, businessLiquidity and competitive position.Capital Resources
Arconic owns important intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. The Company’s intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining Arconic’s competitive position in a number of the markets that the Company serves. Arconic’s competitors may develop technologies that are similar or superior to Arconic’s proprietary technologies or design around the patents Arconic owns or licenses. Despite its controls and safeguards, Arconic’s technology may be misappropriated by its employees, its competitors or other third parties. The pursuit of remedies for any misappropriation of Arconic intellectual property is expensive and the ultimate remedies may be deemed insufficient. Further, in jurisdictions where the enforcement of intellectual property rights is less robust, the risk of misappropriation of Arconic intellectual property increases, despite efforts the Company undertakes to protect it. Developments or assertions by or against Arconic relating to intellectual property rights, and any inability to protect or enforce Arconic’s rights sufficiently, could adversely affect Arconic’s business and competitive position.
A decline in Arconic’sHowmet’s financial performance or outlook or a deterioration incould negatively impact its credit profile,could negatively impact the Company’s its access to capital markets reduce its liquidity and increase its borrowing costs.
Arconic has significant capital requirements and depends, in part, upon the issuance of debt to fund its operations and contractual commitments and pursue strategic acquisitions. A decline in the Company’s financial performance or outlook due to internal or external factors, such as macroeconomic conditions, a deterioration in the Company’s financial metrics or a contraction in the Company’s liquidity, could adversely affect the Company’s access to,credit ratings and the availability or cost of, financing on acceptable terms and conditions. There can be no assurance that Arconic will haveits access to the global capital marketor credit markets on terms and conditions that the Company finds acceptable. A downgrade of Howmet’s credit ratings could result in negative consequences, including limiting its ability to obtain future financing on favorable terms, if at all, increasing borrowing costs and credit facility fees, triggering collateral postings, and adversely affecting the market price of Howmet securities. For information on our credit ratings, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Part II, Item 7(Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations). Limitations on Arconic’sHowmet’s ability to access the global capital markets, a reduction in the Company’sHowmet’s liquidity or an increase in borrowing costs could materially and adversely affect Arconic’s ability to maintain or grow its business, which in turn may adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
A downgrade of Arconic’s credit ratings could limit Arconic’s ability to obtain future financing, increase its borrowing costs, increase the pricing of its credit facilities, adversely affect the market price of its securities,

trigger letter of credit or other collateral postings, or otherwise impair its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Arconic’s credit ratings are important to the Company’s cost of capital. The major credit rating agencies evaluate our creditworthiness and give us specified credit ratings. These ratings are based on a number of factors, including our financial strength and financial policies as well as our strategies, operations, execution and timeliness of financial reporting. These credit ratings are limited in scope, and do not address all material risks related to investment in us, but rather reflect only the view of each rating agency at the time the rating is issued. Nonetheless, the credit ratings Arconic receives impact our borrowing costs as well as the terms upon which we will have access to capital. Failure to maintain sufficiently high credit ratings could adversely affect the interest rate in future financings, our liquidity or our competitive position, and could also restrict our access to capital markets.
On May 1, 2017, Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P) affirmed Arconic’s long-term debt at BBB-, an investment grade rating, with a stable outlook, and its short-term debt at A-3.  On February 7, 2019, S&P placed the rating on negative credit watch and, subsequently, on April 26, S&P affirmed the long-term debt rating at BBB- but changed the outlook to negative.  On January 28, 2020, S&P affirmed the long-term debt rating at BBB- but changed the outlook to stable in expectation of the Separation impact.  On November 1, 2016, Moody’s Investor Service (Moody’s) downgraded Arconic’s long-term debt rating from Ba1, a non-investment grade, to Ba2 with a stable outlook and its short-term debt rating from Speculative Grade Liquidity-1 to Speculative Grade Liquidity-2. Moody’s ratings and outlooks were affirmed on November 2, 2017, October 8, 2018, and October 9, 2019. On January 24, 2020, Moody’s affirmed the long-term debt rating at Ba2 but changed the outlook to negative.  On April 21, 2016, Fitch affirmed Arconic’s long-term debt rating at BB+, a non-investment grade, and short-term debt at B. Additionally, Fitch changed the outlook from positive to evolving. On July 7, 2016, Fitch changed the outlook from evolving to stable (ratings and outlook were affirmed on July 3, 2017). On September 27, 2018, Fitch changed the outlook from stable to positive (ratings and outlook were affirmed on October 8, 2019).
There can be no assurance that one or more of these or other rating agencies will not take negative actions with respect to Arconic’s ratings in the future. Increased debt levels, macroeconomic conditions, a deterioration in the Company’s debt protection metrics, a contraction in the Company’s liquidity, or other factors could potentially trigger such actions. A rating agency may lower, suspend or withdraw entirely a rating or place it on negative outlook or watch if, in that rating agency’s judgment, circumstances so warrant.
A downgrade of Arconic’s credit ratings by one or more rating agencies could: (i) result in adverse consequences, including: adversely impact the market price of Arconic’s securities; (ii) adversely affect existing financing (for example, a downgrade by S&P or Moody’s would subject Arconic to higher costs under Arconic’s Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement and certain of its other revolving credit facilities); (iii) limit access to the capital (including commercial paper) or credit markets or otherwise adversely affect the availability of other new financing on favorable terms, if at all; (iv) result in more restrictive covenants in agreements governing the terms of any future indebtedness that the Company incurs; (v) increase the cost of borrowing or fees on undrawn credit facilities; or (vi) result in vendors or counterparties seeking collateral or letters of credit from Arconic.
Limitations on Arconic’s ability to access the global capital markets, a reduction in Arconic’s liquidity or an increase in borrowing costs could materially and adversely affect Arconic’sHowmet’s ability to maintain or grow its business, which in turn may adversely affect its financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Arconic’s business and growth prospects may be negatively impacted by limits in its capital expenditures.
Arconic requires substantial capital to invest in growth opportunities and to maintain and prolong the life and capacity of its existing facilities. Insufficient cash generation or capital project overruns may negatively impact Arconic’s ability to fund as planned its sustaining and return-seeking capital projects. Over the long term, Arconic’s ability to take advantage of improved market conditions or growth opportunities in its businesses may be constrained by earlier capital expenditure restrictions, which could adversely affect the long-term value of its business and the Company’s position in relation to its competitors.
An adverse decline in the liability discount rate, lower-than-expected investment return on pension assets and other factors could adversely affect Arconic’sHowmet’s results of operations or amount of pension funding contributions in future periods.
Arconic’sHowmet’s results of operations may be negatively affected by the amount of expense ArconicHowmet records for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans, by reductions in the fair value of plan assets and by other factors. ArconicHowmet calculates income or expense for its plans using actuarial valuations in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
America. These valuations reflect assumptions about financial market and other economic conditions, which may change based ondue to changes in key economic indicators. The most significant year-end assumptions used by ArconicHowmet to estimate pension or other postretirement benefit income or expense for the following year are the discount rate applied to plan liabilities and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. In addition, ArconicHowmet is required to make an annual measurement of plan assets and

liabilities, which may result in a significant charge to shareholders’ equity. For a discussion regarding how Arconic’sHowmet’s financial statements can be affected by pension and other postretirement benefits accounting policies, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates-PensionEstimates—Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits” in Part II, Item 7. (Management’s(Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and Note HF to the Consolidated Financial Statements-Pension and Other Postretirement BenefitsStatements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data). Although GAAP expense and pension funding contributions are impacted by different regulations and requirements, the key economic factors that affect GAAP expense would also likely affect the amount of cash or securities Arconic would contribute to the pension plans.
Potential pension contributions include both mandatory amounts required under federal law and discretionary contributions to improve the plans’ funded status. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (“MAP-21”), enacted in 2012, provided temporary relief for employers like Arconic who sponsor defined benefit pension plans related to funding contributions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 by allowing the use of a 25-year average discount rate within an upper and lower range for purposes of determining minimum funding obligations. In 2014, the Highway and Transportation Funding Act (HATFA) was signed into law. HATFA extended the relief provided by MAP-21 and modified the interest rates that had been set by MAP-21. In 2015, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA 2015) was signed into law. BBA 2015 extends the relief period provided by HATFA. Arconic believes that the relief provided by BBA 2015 will moderately reduce the cash flow sensitivity of the Company’s U.S. pension plans’ funded status over the next several years due to recent and potential future declines in discount rates. However, higher than expected pension contributions due to a decline in the plans’ funded status as a result of unpredictable future declines in the discount rate or lower-than-expected investment returns on plan assets could have a material negative effect on the Company’s cash flows. Adverse capital market conditions could result in reductions in the fair value of plan assets and increase the Company’s liabilities related to such plans, whichplans. Additionally, unpredictable future declines in the discount rate or lower-than-expected investment returns on plan assets could lead to a decline in the plans’ funded status and result in higher than expected pension contributions. The foregoing factors may adversely affect Arconic’sthe Company’s financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

12


Dividends and share repurchases fall within the discretion of our Board of Directors and depend on a number of factors.
Share repurchases and the declaration of dividends fall within the discretion of Howmet’s Board of Directors, and the Board’s decision regarding such matters depends on many factors, including Howmet’s financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, debt service obligations, covenants associated with certain of the Company’s debt obligations, industry practice, legal requirements, regulatory constraints and other factors that the Board deems relevant. There can be no assurance that the Company will declare dividends or repurchase stock in the future in any particular amounts, or at all.
Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters
Howmet may be exposed to significant legal proceedings, investigations or changes in U.S. federal, state or foreign law, regulation or policy.
The manufacture and sale of our products expose Howmet to potential product liability, personal injury, property damage and related claims. In the event that a Howmet product fails to perform as expected, regardless of fault, or is used in an unexpected manner, and such failure or use results in, or is alleged to result in, bodily injury and/or property damage or other losses, Howmet may be subject to product liability lawsuits and other claims, or may participate in a recall or other corrective action involving such product. In addition, if a Howmet product is perceived to be defective or unsafe, Howmet’s sales could decrease, its reputation could be adversely impacted and Howmet could be exposed to government investigations or regulatory enforcement actions. Howmet is also subject to a variety of global legal and regulatory compliance risks in connection with its business and products. These risks include, among other things, potential claims, class action lawsuits or compliance issues, including those relating to securities laws, employment laws, intellectual property rights, cyber, security and privacy, insurance, commercial matters, antitrust and competition, human rights, third-party relationships, ESG (including climate-related/sustainability and other) rules and regulations, supply chain operations and the manufacture and sale of products. An adverse outcome in one or more of proceedings or investigations, or unfavorable changes in laws, regulations or policies, or other contingencies that the Company cannot predict with certainty, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, including reputational harm, loss of customers and substantial monetary damages and/or non-monetary penalties. For additional information regarding the legal proceedings involving the Company, see Note Vto the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.
Our business may be adversely affected if we fail to comply with government contracting regulations.
We derive a portion of our revenue from sales to U.S. and foreign governments and their respective agencies. Such contracts are subject to various procurement laws and regulations and contract provisions relating to their formation, administration and performance. New laws and regulations or changes to existing ones (including, but not limited to, those related to subcontracting, cybersecurity and specialty metals) can increase our risks and/or costs. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations or provisions in our government contracts could result in the imposition of various civil and criminal penalties, termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, increased pricing pressure or suspension from future government contracting. If our government contracts are terminated, if we are suspended from government work, or if our ability to compete for new contracts is adversely affected, our financial condition and results of operation could be adversely affected.
Howmet’s global operations expose Howmet to risks that could adversely affect its business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or the market price of its securities.
Howmet has operations or activities in numerous countries and regions outside the United States, including Europe, Mexico, China, and Japan. As a result, Howmet’s global operations are affected by economic, political, legal, and other conditions in the United States and foreign countries in which Howmet does business, including (i) economic and commercial instability risks, including changes in local government laws, regulations and policies, such as those related to tariffs, sanctions and trade barriers, taxation, exchange controls, employment regulations and repatriation of assets or earnings; (ii) geopolitical risks such as political instability, civil unrest, expropriation, nationalization of properties by a government, imposition of sanctions, and renegotiation or nullification of existing agreements; (iii) war, cyber threats, terrorist activities or other dangerous conditions; (iv) compliance with applicable U.S. and foreign laws, including antitrust and competition regulations, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery and corruption laws, and laws concerning trade, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the Export Administration Regulations, and the sanctions, regulations and embargoes administered by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control; (v) aggressive, selective or lax enforcement of laws and regulations by foreign governmental authorities; (vi) exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, as well as inflation, economic factors, and currency controls in the countries in which it operates; and (vii) imposition of currency controls. Although the effect of any of the foregoing factors is difficult to predict, any one or more of them could adversely affect Howmet’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

13


Howmet may face challenges to its intellectual property rights which could adversely affect the Company’s reputation, business and competitive position.
Howmet owns important intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. The Company’s intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining Howmet’s competitive position in a number of the markets that the Company serves. Howmet’s competitors may develop technologies that are similar or superior to Howmet’s proprietary technologies, or design around the patents Howmet owns or licenses. Despite its controls and safeguards, Howmet’s technology may be misappropriated by its employees, its competitors or other third parties. The pursuit of remedies for any misappropriation of Howmet intellectual property is expensive and the ultimate remedies may be deemed insufficient. Further, in jurisdictions where the enforcement of intellectual property rights is less robust, the risk of misappropriation of Howmet intellectual property increases, despite efforts the Company undertakes to protect it. Developments or assertions by or against Howmet relating to intellectual property rights, and any inability to protect or enforce Howmet’s rights sufficiently, could adversely affect Howmet’s business and competitive position.
Unanticipated changes in Arconic’sHowmet’s tax provisions or exposure to additional tax liabilities could affect Arconic’sHowmet’s future profitability.
ArconicHowmet is subject to income taxes in both the United States and various non-U.S. jurisdictions. Its domestic and international tax liabilities are dependent upon the distribution of income among these different jurisdictions. Changes in applicable domestic or foreign tax laws and regulations, or their interpretation and application, including the possibility of retroactive effect, could affect the Company’s tax expense and profitability. Arconic’sHowmet’s tax expense includes estimates of additional tax that may be incurred for tax exposures and reflects various estimates and assumptions. The assumptions include assessments of future earnings of the Company that could impact the valuation of its deferred tax assets. The Company’s future results of operations could be adversely affected by changes in the effective tax rate as a result of a change in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the overall profitability of the Company, changes in tax legislation and rates, changes in generally accepted accounting principles, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, the results of tax audits and examinations of previously filed tax returns or related litigation and continuing assessments of its tax exposures.
Corporate tax law changes continue to be analyzed in the United States and in many other jurisdictions. In particular, on December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Act”) was signed into law, significantly reforming the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. During 2018, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) began a number of guidance projects which serve to both interpret and implement the 2017 Act. Those guidance projects, which include both Proposed and Final Treasury Regulations, continued in 2019 and may continue in 2020. Arconic continues to review the components of the 2017 Act, as well as the ongoing interpretive guidance, and evaluate its consequences. As such, the ultimate impact of the 2017 Act may differ from reported amounts due to, among other things, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made to date; and actions the Company may take as a result of the 2017 Act and related guidance. These changes to the U.S. corporate tax system could have a substantial impact, positive or negative, on Arconic’s future effective tax rate, cash tax expenditures, and deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Arconic may be unable to realize the expected benefits from acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and strategic alliances.
Arconic has made, and may continue to plan and execute, acquisitions and divestitures and take other actions to grow its business or streamline its portfolio. There is no assurance that anticipated benefits will be realized. Acquisitions present significant challenges and risks, including the effective integration of the business into the Company, unanticipated costs and liabilities, and the ability to realize anticipated benefits, such as growth in market share, revenue or margins, at the levels or in the timeframe expected. The Company may be unable to manage acquisitions successfully. Additionally, adverse factors may prevent Arconic from realizing the benefits of its growth projects, including unfavorable global economic conditions, currency fluctuations, or unexpected delays in target timelines.
With respect to portfolio optimization actions such as divestitures, curtailments and closures, Arconic may face barriers to exit from unprofitable businesses or operations, including high exit costs or objections from customers, suppliers, unions, local or

national governments, or other stakeholders. In addition, Arconic may retain unforeseen liabilities for divested entities or businesses, including, but not limited to, if a buyer fails to honor all commitments. Arconic’s business operations are capital intensive, and curtailment or closure of operations or facilities may include significant charges, including employee separation costs, asset impairment charges and other measures.
In addition, Arconic has participated in, and may continue to participate in, joint ventures, strategic alliances and other similar arrangements from time to time. Although the Company has, in connection with past and existing joint ventures, sought to protect its interests, joint ventures and strategic alliances inherently involve special risks. Whether or not Arconic holds majority interests or maintains operational control in such arrangements, its partners may:
have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with or opposed to those of the Company;
exercise veto rights to block actions that Arconic believes to be in our or the joint venture’s or strategic alliance’s best interests;
take action contrary to Arconic’s policies or objectives with respect to investments; or
as a result of financial or other difficulties, be unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations under the joint venture, strategic alliance or other agreements, such as contributing capital to expansion or maintenance projects.
There can be no assurance that acquisitions, growth investments, divestitures, closures, joint ventures, strategic alliances or similar arrangements will be undertaken or completed in their entirety as planned or that they will be beneficial to Arconic, whether due to the above-described risks, unfavorable global economic conditions, increases in construction costs, currency fluctuations, political risks, or other factors.
Arconic’s business could be adversely affected by increases in the cost of aluminum.
Arconic derives a significant portion of its revenue from aluminum-based products. The price of primary aluminum has historically been subject to significant cyclical price fluctuations and the timing of changes in the market price of aluminum is largely unpredictable. Although the Company’s pricing of products is generally intended to pass substantially all the risk of metal price fluctuations on to the Company’s customers or is otherwise hedged, there are situations where Arconic is unable to pass on the entire cost of increases to its customers and there is a potential time lag on certain products between increases in costs for aluminum and the point when the Company can implement a corresponding increase in price to its customers and/or there are other timing factors that may result in Arconic's exposure to certain price fluctuations which could have a material adverse effect on Arconic’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Further, since metal prices fluctuate among the various exchanges, Arconic competitors may enjoy a metal price advantage from time to time.
Arconic may be adversely affected by changes in the availability or cost of other raw materials (including, but not limited to, cobalt, nickel, titanium sponge, vanadium, copper, magnesium and zinc), as well as freight costs associated with transportation of raw materials. The availability and costs of certain raw materials necessary for the production of Arconic’s products may be influenced by private or government entities including mergers and acquisitions, changes in world politics or regulatory requirements (such as human rights regulations or environmental regulations), labor relations between the producers and their work forces, unstable governments in exporting nations, export quotas, sanctions, new or increased import duties, countervailing or anti-dumping duties, market forces of supply and demand, and inflation. In addition, from time to time, commodity prices may fall rapidly. When this happens, suppliers may withdraw capacity from the market until prices improve, which may cause periodic supply interruptions. Arconic may be unable to offset fully the effects of raw material shortages or higher costs through customer price increases, productivity improvements or cost reduction programs. Shortages or price fluctuations in raw materials could have a material adverse effect on Arconic’s operating results.
Arconic is dependent on a limited number of suppliers for a substantial portion of our aluminum and certain other raw materials essential to our operations.
Arconic has supply arrangements with a limited number of suppliers for aluminum and other raw materials. We maintain annual or long-term contracts for a majority of our supply requirements, and for the remainder we depend on spot purchases. From time to time, increasing demand levels have caused regional supply constraints in the industry and further increases in demand levels could exacerbate these issues. Such constraints could impact our production or force us to purchase primary metal and other supplies from alternative sources, which may not be available in sufficient quantities or may only be available on terms that are less favorable to us. Further, there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew, or obtain replacements for, any of our long-term contracts when they expire on terms that are as favorable as our existing agreements or at all. Additionally, Arconic could have exposure if a key supplier in a particular region is unable to deliver sufficient quantities of a necessary material on a timely basis. In addition, a significant downturn in the business or financial condition of our significant suppliers exposes us to the risk of default by the supplier on our contractual agreements, and this risk is increased by weak and deteriorating economic conditions on a global, regional or industry sector level.

Arconic is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, as well as inflation, economic factors, and currency controls in the countries in which it operates.
Economic factors, including inflation and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, competitive factors in the countries in which Arconic operates, and continued volatility or deterioration in the global economic and financial environment could affect Arconic’s revenues, expenses and results of operations. Changes in the valuation of the U.S. dollar against other currencies, including the Euro, British pound, Canadian dollar, Chinese yuan (renminbi), Japanese yen and Russian ruble, may affect Arconic’s profitability as some important inputs are purchased in other currencies, while the Company’s products are generally sold in U.S. dollars.
In addition, a portion of Arconic’s indebtedness, including certain borrowings under the Company’s Five-Year Credit Facility, bears interest at rates equal to the London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin based on the credit ratings of Arconic’s outstanding senior unsecured long-term debt. Accordingly, the Company is subject to risk from changes in interest rates on the variable component of the rate. Further, LIBOR is the subject of recent national, international and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms and other pressures may cause LIBOR to disappear entirely or to perform differently than in the past. The consequences of these developments cannot be entirely predicted, but could include changes in the cost of Arconic’s variable rate indebtedness.
Arconic also faces risks arising from the imposition of cash repatriation restrictions and exchange controls. Cash repatriation restrictions and exchange controls may limit the Company’s ability to convert foreign currencies into U.S. dollars or to remit dividends and other payments by Arconic’s foreign subsidiaries or businesses located in or conducted within a country imposing restrictions or controls. While Arconic currently has no need, and does not intend, to repatriate or convert cash held in countries that have significant restrictions or controls in place, should the Company need to do so to fund its operations, it may be unable to repatriate or convert such cash, or be unable to do so without incurring substantial costs. Arconic currently has substantial operations in countries that have cash repatriation restrictions or exchange controls in place, including China, and, if the Company were to need to repatriate or convert such cash, these controls and restrictions may have an adverse effect on Arconic’s operating results and financial condition.
Arconic may not realize expected benefits from its productivity and cost-reduction initiatives.
Arconic has undertaken, and may continue to undertake, productivity and cost-reduction initiatives to improve performance and conserve cash, including deployment of company-wide business process models, such as Arconic’s degrees of implementation process in which ideas are executed in a disciplined manner to generate savings, and operating cost reductions. There is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful or beneficial to Arconic or that estimated cost savings from such activities will be realized. If Arconic fails to achieve net cost savings at anticipated levels, its business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Arconic’s customers may reduce their demand for aluminum products in favor of alternative materials.
Certain applications of Arconic’s aluminum-based products compete with products made from other materials, such as steel, titanium and composites. The willingness of customers to pursue materials other than aluminum often depends upon the desire to achieve specific attributes. For example, the commercial aerospace industry has used and continues to evaluate the further use of alternative materials to aluminum, such as titanium and composites, in order to reduce the weight and increase the fuel efficiency of aircraft. Additionally, the automotive industry, while motivated to reduce vehicle weight through the use of aluminum, may revert to steel or other materials for certain applications. Further, the decision to use aluminum may be impacted by aluminum prices or compatibility of aluminum with other materials used by a customer in a given application. The willingness of customers to accept other materials in lieu of aluminum could adversely affect the demand for certain of Arconic’s products, and thus adversely affect Arconic’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Labor disputes and other employee relations issues could adversely affect Arconic’sHowmet’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
A significant portion of Arconic’sHowmet’s employees are represented by labor unions in a number ofseveral countries under various collective bargaining agreements, each with varying durations and expiration dates. For more information, see “Employees” in Part I, Item 1. (Business) of this report. While Arconic previously has been successful in renegotiating its collective bargaining agreements with various unions, ArconicHowmet may not be able to satisfactorily renegotiate allnegotiate successor collective bargaining agreements upon expiration, in the United States and other countries, when they expire. In addition, existing collective bargaining agreements may not preventwithout a strikerisk of labor disputes, including strikes or work stoppage at Arconic’s facilities in the future. Arconicstoppages. Howmet may also be subject to general country strikes or work stoppages unrelated to its business or collective bargaining agreements. Any such labor disputes or work stoppages (or potential work stoppages) could have a material adverse effect on Arconic’sHowmet’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

A failure to attract, retain or provide adequate succession plans for key personnel could adversely affect Arconic’s operations and competitiveness.
Arconic’s existing operations and development projects require highly skilled executives and staff with relevant industry and technical experience. The inability of the Company to attract and retain such people may adversely impact Arconic’s ability to meet project demands adequately and fill roles in existing operations. Skills shortages in engineering, manufacturing, technology, construction and maintenance contractors and other labor market inadequacies may also impact activities. These shortages may adversely impact the cost and schedule of development projects and the cost and efficiency of existing operations.
In addition, the continuity of key personnel and the preservation of institutional knowledge are vital to the success of the Company’s growth and business strategy. The loss of key members of management and other personnel could significantly harm Arconic’s business, and any unplanned turnover, or failure to develop adequate succession plans for key positions, could deplete the Company’s institutional knowledge base, result in loss of technical or other expertise, delay or impede the execution of the Company’s business plans and erode Arconic’s competitiveness.
Arconic may be exposed to significant legal proceedings, investigations or changes in U.S. federal, state or foreign law, regulation or policy.
Arconic’s results of operations or liquidity in a particular period could be affected by new or increasingly stringent laws, regulatory requirements or interpretations, or outcomes of significant legal proceedings or investigations adverse to Arconic. The Company may experience an unfavorable change in effective tax rates or become subject to unexpected or rising costs associated with business operations or provision of health or welfare benefits to employees due to changes in laws, regulations or policies.
Arconic is also subject to a variety of legal and regulatory compliance risks in the United States and abroad in connection with its business and products. These risks include, among other things, potential claims relating to product liability, product testing, health and safety, environmental matters, employment matters, required record keeping and record retention, compliance with securities laws, intellectual property rights, government contracts and taxes, insurance or commercial matters, as well as compliance with U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including those governing import and export, anti-bribery, antitrust and competition, sales and trading practices, human rights and modern slavery, sourcing of raw materials, third-party relationships, supply chain operations and the manufacture and sale of products. Arconic may be a party to litigation in a foreign jurisdiction where geopolitical risks might influence the ultimate outcome of such litigation. Arconic could be subject to fines, penalties, damages (in certain cases, treble damages), or suspension or debarment from government contracts.
The global and diverse nature of Arconic’s operations means that these risks will continue to exist, and additional legal proceedings and contingencies may arise from time to time. While Arconic believes it has adopted appropriate risk management and compliance programs to address and reduce these risks, including insurance arrangements with respect to these risks, such measures may provide inadequate protection against liabilities that may arise. In addition, various factors or developments can lead the Company to change current estimates of liabilities or make such estimates for matters previously unsusceptible to reasonable estimates, such as a significant judicial ruling or judgment, a significant settlement, significant regulatory developments or changes in applicable law. A future adverse ruling or settlement or unfavorable changes in laws, regulations or policies, or other contingencies that the Company cannot predict with certainty could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in a particular period. Litigation and compliance efforts may require substantial attention from management and could result in significant legal expenses, settlement costs or damage awards that could have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. For additional information regarding the legal proceedings involving the Company, including proceedings and investigations relating to the June 13, 2017 fire at the Grenfell Tower in London, U.K., see the discussion in Part I, Item 3. (Legal Proceedings) of this report and in Note T to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data).
ArconicHowmet is exposed to environmental, health and safety risks and is subject to a broad range of health, safety and environmental laws and regulations which may result in substantial costs and liabilities.
Arconic’sHowmet’s operations worldwide are subject to numerous complex and increasingly stringent health, safety and environmental laws and regulations. The costs of complying with such laws and regulations, includingas well as participation in assessments and cleanups of sites, as well asand internal voluntary programs, are significanthave been, and will continue toin the future could be, so for the foreseeable future. Environmental laws may impose cleanup liability on owners and occupiers of contaminated property, including present, past or divested properties, regardless of whether the owners and occupiers caused the contamination or whether the activity that caused the contamination was lawful at the time it was conducted.significant. Environmental matters for which ArconicHowmet may be liable may arise in the future at its present sites, at sites owned or operated by its predecessors or affiliates, at sites that it may acquire in the future, or at third-party sites used by Arconic,Howmet, its predecessors or affiliates for material and waste handling and disposal. Compliance with health, safety and environmental laws and regulations, including remediation obligations, may prove to be

more challenging and costly than the Company anticipates. Arconic’simpact Howmet’s results of operations or liquidity in a particular period could be affected by certain health, safety or environmental matters, including remediation costs and damages related to certain sites as well as other health and safety risks relating to its operations and products. Additionally, evolving regulatory standards and expectations can result in increased litigation and/or increased costs, including increased remediation costs, all of which can have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.period.
In addition, the industrial activities conducted at Arconic’sHowmet’s facilities present a significant risk of injury or death to our employees customers or third parties that may be on site. We have experienced serious injuries in the past, notwithstanding the safety protocols, practices and precautions we take. Our operations are subject to regulation by various federal, state and local agencies in the United States, including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and regulation by foreign government entities abroad responsible for employee health and safety, including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. From timesafety. Material liabilities relating to time, we have incurred fines for violations of various health and safety standards. While we maintain insurance and have in place policies to minimize such risks, we may nevertheless be unable to avoid material liabilities for any injury, death or death that may occur in the future. These types of incidents may not be covered by or may exceed our insurance coverage andother workers’ compensation claims could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition or result in negative publicity and/or significant reputational harm.
Arconic is subject to privacy and data security/protection laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates and may be exposed to substantial costs and liabilities associated with such laws and regulations.
The regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is increasingly demanding, with frequent imposition
14


Failure to comply with domestic or international employment and related laws could result in penalties or costs that could have a material adverse effect on Arconic’s business results.
Arconic is subject to a variety of domestic and foreign employment laws, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act (which governs such matters as minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions), state and local wage laws, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, and regulations related to safety, discrimination, organizing, whistle-blowing, classification of employees, privacy and severance payments, citizenship requirements, and healthcare insurance mandates. Allegations that Arconic has violated such laws or regulations could damage the Company’s reputation and lead to fines from or settlements with federal, state or foreign regulatory authorities or damages payable to employees, which could have a material adverse impact on Arconic’s operations and financial condition.
ArconicHowmet may be affected by global climate change or by legal, regulatory, customer or marketsupplier responses to such change.
Increased concern over climate change has led to new and proposed legislative and regulatory initiatives, such as cap-and-trade systems and additional limits on emissions of greenhouse gases, or Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standardswhich in the United States.turn may trigger customer decarbonization requirements. New or revised laws, regulations and regulationspolicies in this area and customer decarbonization requirements could directly and indirectly affect ArconicHowmet and its customers and suppliers, including by increasing the costs of production or impacting demand for certain products, which could result in an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, Howmet utilizes natural gas, electricity and other fuels to operate its facilities. Significant increased energy costs and/or costs to transition to renewable energy sources, as a result of new laws, such as carbon pricing or product energy efficiency requirements, or as a result of customer requirements, could be passed along to the Company and its customers and suppliers. Compliance with any new or more stringent laws or regulations, or stricter interpretations of existing laws, could require additional expenditures by the Company or its customers or suppliers. Also, Arconic relies
Physical risks associated with climate change may result in an increase of the exposure to, and impact of, events with damage due to flooding, extreme winds and extreme precipitation for Howmet locations, suppliers or customers. Prolonged periods of drought may result in wildfires and/or restrictions on natural gas, electricity, fuel oilprocess water use. These climate-related impacts may have an adverse effect on production capacity of Howmet sites, suppliers and transport fuel to operate its facilities. Any increased costscustomers. These types of these energy sources becauseincidents could have a material adverse effect on our results of new laws could be passed alongoperations and financial condition.
With respect to the Company and its customers and suppliers, which could also have a negative impact on Arconic’s profitability.
Changes in the United Kingdom’s economic and other relationships with the European Union could adversely affect Arconic.
In March 2017, the United Kingdom formally triggered the process to withdraw from the European Union (also referred to as "Brexit") following the results of a national referendumvarious transaction agreements that took place in June 2016. The United Kingdom formally left the European Union on January 31, 2020. A transition period through December 31, 2020 has been established to allow the United Kingdom and the European Union to negotiate the terms of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal. However, there is continued uncertainty surrounding the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union, including trade agreements between the United Kingdom and the European Union.
The ultimate effects of Brexit on Arconic are difficult to predict, but because the Company currently operates and conducts business in the United Kingdom and in Europe, Brexit could cause disruptions and create uncertainty to Arconic’s businesses,

including affecting the business of and/or our relationships with Arconic’s customers and suppliers, as well as altering the relationship among tariffs and currencies, including the value of the British pound and the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar. Such disruptions and uncertainties could adversely affect Arconic’s financial condition, operating results and cash flows. In addition, Brexit could result in legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as new legal relationships between the United Kingdom and the European Union are established. The ultimate effects of Brexit on Arconic will also depend on the terms of any agreements the United Kingdom and the European Union make to retain access to each other’s respective markets either during the transition period or more permanently.
Dividends on Arconic common stock could be reduced or eliminated in the event of material future deterioration in business conditions or in other circumstances.
Arconic has historically paid dividends on its common stock; however, it has no obligation to do so. The existence, timing, declaration, amount and payment of future dividends to Arconic’s stockholders falls within the discretion of Arconic’s Board of Directors, and the Company’s dividend policy may change at any time without advance notice to Arconic’s stockholders. For example, on February 8, 2019,entered into in connection with its separation transactions, if the Company’s ongoing strategiccounterparties fail to meet their obligations orif we have material indemnification obligations under such agreements, our business, results of operations and portfolio review,financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
In connection with our separation transactions, we entered into various agreements with Arconic announcedCorporation and Alcoa Corporation, including respective Separation and Distribution agreements pursuant to which Arconic Corporation and Alcoa Corporation agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities, and we agreed to indemnify those parties for certain liabilities. We rely on these parties to satisfy their performance and payment obligations under these agreements. If either party is unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations under its applicable agreements, we could incur operational difficulties and/or material losses. The indemnities that it expectedwe are required to reduceprovide Alcoa Corporation and Arconic Corporation under these agreements are currently not material. If either Alcoa Corporation or Arconic Corporation, as applicable, is not able to fully satisfy its quarterly common stock dividend from $0.06indemnification obligations to $0.02 per share. us, we may be required to bear such losses. Each of these risks could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Arconic Board of Directors’ decisions regarding the payment of dividends will depend on many factors, such as Arconic’s financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, debt service obligations, covenants associated with certain of the Company’s debt service obligations, industry practice, legal requirements, regulatory constraints and other factors that Arconic’s Board of Directors deems relevant. Arconic’s Board of Directors may determine to further reduce or eliminate Arconic’s common stock dividend in the event of material future deteriorations in business conditions or in other circumstances.
Anti-takeover provisions could prevent or delay a change in control of Arconic, including a takeover attempt by a third party and limit the power of Arconic’s shareholders.
Arconic’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws contain, and Delaware law contains, provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the bidder and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with Arconic’s Board of Directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. For example, Arconic is subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which imposes certain restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between the Company and any holder of 15% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which could make it more difficult for another party to acquire Arconic. Additionally, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation authorizes Arconic’s Board of Directors to issue preferred stock or adopt other anti-takeover measures without shareholder approval. These provisions may apply even if an offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that Arconic’s Board of Directors determines is not in the best interests of Arconic’s shareholders. These provisions may also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of Arconic common stock or prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.
Risks Related to theInc. Separation of Alcoa
The Separation of AlcoaTransaction could result in substantial tax liability.
It was a condition to the Distributiondistribution of Alcoa that (i) the private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) regarding certain U.S. federal income tax matters relatingall outstanding shares of Arconic Corporation common stock to the Company’s stockholders (the “Distribution of Arconic”), which effected the Arconic Inc. Separation of Alcoa and the Distribution of Alcoa received by Arconic remain valid and be satisfactory to Arconic’s Board of Directors and (ii) ArconicTransaction, that we receive an opinion of itsour outside counsel satisfactory to the Board of Directors, regarding the qualification of the Distribution of Alcoa, together with certain related transactions,distribution as a transaction that is generally tax-free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under“reorganization” within the meaning of Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Both of these conditions wereThis condition was satisfied prior to the Distribution of Alcoa.Arconic. However, if any of the IRS private letter ruling and the opinion of counsel were based upon and relied on, among other things, various facts, and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements andor undertakings of Arconic and Alcoa Corporation, including those relating to the past and future conduct of Arconic and Alcoa Corporation. If any of these representations, statements or undertakingsopinion is, or becomes, inaccurate or incomplete, or if Arconic or Alcoa Corporation breaches any of its representations or covenants contained in any of the Separation of Alcoa-related agreements and documents or in any documents relating to the IRS private letter ruling and/or the opinion of counsel, the IRS private letter ruling and/or the opinion of counsel may be invalid and the conclusions reached therein could be jeopardized.
Notwithstanding Arconic’s receipt of Further, the IRS private letter ruling and the opinion of counsel, the IRSInternal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) could determine that the Distribution of Alcoa and/or certain related transactions should be treated as taxable transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes if it determines that any of the facts, representations assumptions or undertakings upon which the IRS private letter ruling or the opinion of counsel was based are false or have been violated. In addition, the IRS private letter ruling does not address all of the issues that are relevant to determining whether the Distribution of Alcoa, together with certain related transactions, qualifies as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, andAdditionally, the opinion of counsel represents the judgment of such counsel and is not binding on the IRS or any court and the IRS or a court may disagree with the

conclusions in the opinion of counsel. Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt by Arconic of the IRS private letter ruling and the opinion of counsel, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the Distribution of Alcoa and/or certain related transactions do not qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. In the event the IRS were to prevail with such challenge, Arconic, Alcoa Corporationwe, our stockholders and Arconic shareholdersCorporation could be subject to significant U.S. federal income tax liability.
If the Distribution of Alcoa, together with certain related transactions, fails to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, in general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Arconic would recognize taxable gain as if it had sold the Alcoa Corporation common stock in a taxable sale for its fair market value and Arconic shareholders who received Alcoa Corporation shares in the distribution would be subject to tax as if they had received a taxable distribution equal to the fair market value of such shares.
Under current U.S. federal income tax law, In addition, even if the Distribution of Alcoa,Arconic, together with certain related transactions, otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code,current U.S. federal income tax law, the Distribution of AlcoaArconic may nevertheless be rendered taxable to Arconic and its shareholdersus as a result of certain post-Distribution of Alcoapost-distribution transactions, including certain acquisitions of shares or assets of ours or Arconic or Alcoa Corporation. The possibility of rendering the Distribution of Alcoa taxable as a result of such transactions may limit Arconic’s ability to pursue certain equity issuances, strategic transactions or other transactions that would otherwise maximize the value of Arconic’s business.
Under the Tax Matters Agreement that Arconictax matters agreement we entered into with AlcoaArconic Corporation Alcoain connection with the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction, Arconic Corporation may be required to indemnify Arconic againstus for any additional taxes and related amounts resulting from (i) an acquisition of all or a portion of the equity securities or assets of Alcoa Corporation, whether by merger or otherwise (and regardless of whether Alcoa Corporation participated in or otherwise facilitated the acquisition), (ii) issuing equity securities beyondseparation due to certain thresholds, (iii) repurchasing shares of Alcoa Corporation stock other than in certain open-market transactions, (iv) ceasing actively to conduct certain of its businesses, (v) other actions, or failures to act by Alcoa Corporation or (vi) any of Alcoaincluding Arconic Corporation’s representations, covenants or undertakings contained in any of the Separation of Alcoa-relatedseparation agreement and certain other agreements, and documents or in any documents relating to the IRS private letter ruling and/orincluding the opinion of counsel, being incorrect or violated. However, the indemnity from AlcoaArconic Corporation may not be insufficientable to protect Arconic against the full amount of such additional taxes or related liabilities, and Alcoa Corporation may be unable tofully satisfy its indemnification obligations fully. Moreover, even if Arconic ultimately succeeds in recovering from Alcoa Corporation any amounts for which Arconic is held liable, Arconic may be temporarily required to bear such losses.obligations. In addition, Arconic and Arconic’s subsidiarieswe may incur certainother tax costs in connection with the Arconic Inc. Separation of Alcoa,Transaction, including non-U.S. tax costs resulting from separationstransactions in non-U.S. jurisdictions, which may be material. Each of these risks could negatively affect Arconic’sour business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to the Separation of Arconic
The Separation of Arconic involves significant time and expense, which could disrupt or adversely affect Arconic’s business, may not achieve some or all of the anticipated benefits, is subject to various risks and uncertainties and may not be completed in accordance with the expected plans or anticipated timelines, or at all.
On February 8, 2019, Arconic announced plans to separate into two independent, publicly-traded companies, composed of the Engineered Products and Forgings businesses, on the one hand, and the Global Rolled Products businesses, on the other hand. The Separation of Arconic will be subject to the satisfaction of a number of customary conditions, including, among others, receipt of a tax opinion from external counsel.
Arconic expects that the process of completing the Separation of Arconic will be time-consuming and involve significant costs and expenses, which may be significantly higher than what it currently anticipates and may not yield a benefit if the Separation of Arconic is not completed. Executing the Separation of Arconic will also require significant time and attention from Arconic’s senior management and employees, which could disrupt the Company’s ongoing business and adversely affect financial results and results of operations. Arconic may also experience increased difficulties in attracting, retaining and motivating employees or maintaining or initiating relationships with lead suppliers, customers and other parties with which Arconic currently does business, or may do business in the future, during the pendency of the Separation of Arconic and following its completion, which could have a material and adverse effect on Arconic’s businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, or the businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of the independent companies resulting from the Separation of Arconic. And, although we intend for the separation transactions to be tax-free to the Company’s shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, there can be no assurance that Separation of Arconic will so qualify. If the Separation of Arconic were ultimately determined to be taxable, we, the Company’s shareholders and/or the new independent company would incur income tax liabilities that could be significant.
Arconic may not realize some or all of the anticipated strategic, financial, operational or other benefits from the Separation of Arconic. For example, as independent companies, the Engineered Products & Forgings and Global Rolled Products businesses will be smaller, less diversified companies with a narrower business focus and may be more vulnerable to changing market conditions, such as changes in industry conditions, which could result in increased volatility in their cash flows, working capital

and financing requirements and could materially and adversely affect the respective business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, following the Separation of Arconic, there can be no assurance that either company will be able to obtain an investment grade rating from nationally recognized credit rating agencies, which could, among other things, increase the non-investment grade rated company’s cost of capital. Further, there can be no assurance that the combined value of the common stock of the two companies will be equal to or greater than what the value of Arconic’s common stock would have been had the proposed Separation of Arconic not occurred.
Additionally, the separation is subject to market, regulatory and certain other conditions. Unanticipated developments, including, among others, failure of the Separation of Arconic to qualify for the expected tax treatment, the possibility that any third-party consents required in connection with the Separation of Arconic will not be received, material adverse changes in business or industry conditions and changes in global economic and financial market conditions generally, could delay or prevent the completion of the Separation of Arconic, or cause the Separation of Arconic to occur on terms or conditions that are different or less favorable than expected.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.

15


Item 2. Properties.
Arconic’sHowmet’s principal office and corporate center is located at 201 Isabella Street, Suite 200, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212-5858. The Arconic Technology Center15212-5872. In the second quarter of 2022, the Company sold this property and entered into a 12-year lease with the purchaser for research and development is located at 100 Technical Drive, New Kensington, Pennsylvania 15069-0001.a portion of the property.
ArconicHowmet leases some of its facilities; however, it is the opinion of management that the leases do not materially affect the continued use of the properties or the properties’ values.
ArconicHowmet believes that its facilities are suitable and adequate for its operations. Although no title examination of properties owned by ArconicHowmet has been made for the purpose of this report, the Company knows of no material defects in title to any such properties. See Notes Note A and MNote O to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K.
ArconicHowmet has active plants and holdings under the following segments and in the followingvarious geographic areas:
ENGINEERED PRODUCTS AND FORGINGS
areas. See the table and related textregarding the Company's principal facilities in the Engineered Products and Forgings FacilitiesPart I, Item 1 section on page 7 of this report.(Business).
GLOBAL ROLLED PRODUCTS
See the table and related text in the Global Rolled Products Facilities section on page 10 of this report.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of its business, ArconicHowmet is involved in a number of lawsuits and claims, both actual and potential.
Environmental Matters
Arconic is involved in For a discussion of legal proceedings, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, also known as Superfund (CERCLA) or analogous state provisions regarding the usage, disposal, storage or treatment of hazardous substances at a number of sites in the U.S. The Company has committed to participate, or is engaged in negotiations with federal or state authorities relative to its alleged liability for participation, in clean-up efforts at several such sites. The most significant of these matters, the remediation of the Grasse River in Massena, NY, is discussed in the Environmental Matters section of see Note VT to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption “Environmental Matters”.
Reynobond PE
As previously reported, on June 13, 2017, the Grenfell Tower in London, U.K. caught fire resulting in fatalities, injuries and damage. A French subsidiary of Arconic, Arconic Architectural Products SAS (AAP SAS), supplied a product, Reynobond PE, to its customer, a cladding system fabricator, which used the product as one component of the overall cladding system on Grenfell Tower. The fabricator supplied its portion of the cladding system to the façade installer, who then completed and installed the system under the direction of the general contractor. Neither Arconic nor AAP SAS was involved in the design or installation of the system used at the Grenfell Tower, nor did it have a role in any other aspect of the building’s refurbishment or original design. Regulatory investigations into the overall Grenfell Tower matter are being conducted, including a criminal investigation by the London Metropolitan Police Service (the “Police”), a Public Inquiry by the British government and a

consumer protection inquiry by a French public authority. The Public Inquiry was announced by the U.K. Prime Minister on June 15, 2017 and subsequently was authorized to examine the circumstances leading up to and surrounding the Grenfell Tower fire in order to make findings of fact and recommendations to the U.K. Government on matters such as the design, construction, and modification of the building, the role of relevant public authorities and contractors, the implications of the fire for the adequacy and enforcement of relevant regulations, arrangements in place for handling emergencies, and the handling of concerns from residents, among other things. Hearings for Phase 1 of the Public Inquiry began on May 21, 2018 and concluded on December 12, 2018. Phase 2 hearings of the Public Inquiry began in early 2020, following which a final report will be written and subsequently published. AAP SAS is participating as a Core Participant in the Public Inquiry and is also cooperating with the ongoing parallel investigation by the Police. The Company no longer sells the PE product for architectural use on buildings. Given the preliminary nature of these investigations and the uncertainty of potential future litigation, the Company cannot reasonably estimate at this time the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the possible loss or range of losses in the event of an unfavorable outcome.
Behrens et al. v. Arconic Inc. et al.   As previously reported, on June 6, 2019, 247 plaintiffs comprised of survivors and estates of decedents of the Grenfell Tower fire filed a complaint against “Arconic Inc., Alcoa Inc., and Arconic Architectural Products, LLC” (collectively, for purposes of the description of such proceeding, the “Arconic Defendants”), as well as Saint-Gobain Corporation, d/b/a Celotex and Whirlpool Corporation, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The complaint alleges claims under Pennsylvania state law for products liability and wrongful death related to the fire. In particular, the plaintiffs allege that the Arconic Defendants knowingly supplied a dangerous product (Reynobond PE) for installation on the Grenfell Tower despite knowing that Reynobond PE was unfit for use above a certain height. The Arconic Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on June 19, 2019. On August 29, 2019, the Arconic Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on the bases, among other things, that: (i) the case should be heard in the United Kingdom, not the United States; (ii) there is no jurisdiction over necessary parties; and (iii) Pennsylvania products liability law does not apply to manufacture and sale of product overseas. On December 23, 2019, the Court issued an order denying the motion to dismiss the complaint on bases (ii) and (iii) and suggesting a procedure for limited discovery followed by further briefing on those subjects. Discovery is ongoing on defendants’ motion to have the case dismissed in favor of a UK forum (forum non conveniens). On January 23, 2020, the Court ordered that the parties complete discovery relating to forum non conveniens by March 16, 2020, and that briefing conclude on April 13, 2020. The Court will hold oral argument on this motion on May 7, 2020. Given the preliminary naturePart II, Item 8 of this matter and the uncertainty of litigation, the Company cannot reasonably estimate at this time the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the possible loss or range of losses in the event of an unfavorable outcome.Form 10-K.
Howard v. Arconic Inc. et al.   As previously reported, a purported class action complaint related to the Grenfell Tower fire was filed on August 11, 2017, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania against Arconic Inc. and Klaus Kleinfeld. A related purported class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on September 15, 2017, under the caption Sullivan v. Arconic Inc. et al., against Arconic Inc. three former Arconic executives, several current and former Arconic directors, and banks that acted as underwriters for Arconic’s September 18, 2014 preferred stock offering (the “Preferred Offering”). The plaintiff in Sullivan had previously filed a purported class action against the same defendants on July 18, 2017 in the Southern District of New York and, on August 25, 2017, voluntarily dismissed that action without prejudice. On February 7, 2018, on motion from certain putative class members, the court consolidated Howard and Sullivan, closed Sullivan, and appointed lead plaintiffs in the consolidated case. On April 9, 2018, the lead plaintiffs in the consolidated purported class action filed a consolidated amended complaint. The consolidated amended complaint alleged that the registration statement for the Preferred Offering contained false and misleading statements and omitted to state material information, including by allegedly failing to disclose material uncertainties and trends resulting from sales of Reynobond PE for unsafe uses and by allegedly expressing a belief that appropriate risk management and compliance programs had been adopted while concealing the risks posed by Reynobond PE sales. The consolidated amended complaint also alleged that between November 4, 2013 and June 23, 2017 Arconic and Kleinfeld made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose material information about the Company’s commitment to safety, business and financial prospects, and the risks of the Reynobond PE product, including in Arconic’s Form 10-Ks for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, its Form 10-Qs and quarterly financial press releases from the fourth quarter of 2013 through the first quarter of 2017, its 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 Annual Reports, its 2016 Annual Highlights Report, and on its official website. The consolidated amended complaint sought, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages and an award of attorney and expert fees and expenses. On June 8, 2018, all defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint for failure to state a claim. On June 21, 2019, the Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss in full, dismissing the consolidated amended complaint in its entirety without prejudice. On July 23, 2019, the lead plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. The second amended complaint alleges generally the same claims as the consolidated amended complaint with certain additional allegations, as well as claims that the risk factors set forth in the registration statement for the Preferred Offering were inadequate and that certain additional statements in the sources identified above were misleading. The second amended complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages and an award of attorney and expert fees and expenses. On September 11, 2019, all defendants moved to dismiss the second amended

complaint. Plaintiffs’ opposition to that motion was filed on November 1, 2019 and all defendants filed a reply brief on November 26, 2019. Given the preliminary nature of this matter and the uncertainty of litigation, the Company cannot reasonably estimate at this time the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the possible loss or range of losses in the event of an unfavorable outcome.
Raul v. Albaugh, et al.   As previously reported, on June 22, 2018, a derivative complaint was filed nominally on behalf of Arconic by a purported Arconic stockholder against the then members of Arconic’s Board of Directors and Klaus Kleinfeld and Ken Giacobbe, naming Arconic as a nominal defendant, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint raises similar allegations as the consolidated amended complaint and second amended complaint in Howard, as well as allegations that the defendants improperly authorized the sale of Reynobond PE for unsafe uses, and asserts claims under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Delaware state law. On July 13, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation agreeing to stay this case until the final resolution of the Howard case, the Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry in London, and the investigation by the Police and on July 23, 2018, the Court approved the stay. Given the preliminary nature of this matter and the uncertainty of litigation, the Company cannot reasonably estimate at this time the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the possible loss or range of losses in the event of an unfavorable outcome.
While the Company believes that these cases are without merit and intends to challenge them vigorously, there can be no assurances regarding the ultimate resolution of these matters.
Stockholder Demands.   As previously reported, the Board of Directors also received letters, purportedly sent on behalf of stockholders, reciting allegations similar to those made in the federal court lawsuits and demanding that the Board authorize the Company to initiate litigation against members of management, the Board, and others. The Board of Directors appointed a Special Litigation Committee of the Board to review, investigate, and make recommendations to the Board regarding the appropriate course of action with respect to these stockholder demand letters. On May 22, 2019, the Special Litigation Committee, following completion of its investigation into the claims demanded in the demand letters, recommended to the Board that it reject the demands to authorize commencement of litigation. On May 28, 2019, the Board adopted the Special Litigation Committee’s findings and recommendations and rejected the demands that it authorize commencement of actions to assert the claims set forth in the demand letters.
Other Matters
As previously reported, Arconic Inc. and its subsidiaries and former subsidiaries are defendants in lawsuits filed on behalf of persons alleging injury as a result of occupational or other exposure to asbestos. Arconic, its subsidiaries and former subsidiaries have numerous insurance policies over many years that provide coverage for asbestos related claims. Arconic has significant insurance coverage and believes that Arconic’s reserves are adequate for its known asbestos exposure related liabilities. The costs of defense and settlement have not been and are not expected to be material to the results of operations, cash flows, and financial position of the Company.
Tax
Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, entered into between the Company and Alcoa Corporation in connection with the Separation of Alcoa, the Company shares responsibility with Alcoa Corporation for, and Alcoa Corporation has agreed to partially indemnify the Company with respect to, the following matter.
As previously reported, in July 2013, following a Spanish corporate income tax audit covering the 2006 through 2009 tax years, an assessment was received mainly disallowing certain interest deductions claimed by a Spanish consolidated tax group owned by the Company. In August 2013, the Company filed an appeal of this assessment in Spain’s Central Tax Administrative Court, which was denied in January 2015. Arconic filed another appeal in Spain’s National Court in March 2015 which was denied in July 2018. The National Court’s decision requires the assessment for the 2006 through 2009 tax years to be reissued to take into account the outcome of the 2003 to 2005 audit which was closed in 2017. The Company estimates the revised assessment to be $172 million (€154 million), including interest.
In March 2019, the Supreme Court of Spain accepted the Company’s petition to review the National Court’s decision, and the Company has filed a formal appeal of the assessment. The Supreme Court is reviewing the assessment on its merits and will render a final decision. In the event the Company receives an unfavorable ruling from the Supreme Court of Spain, a portion of the assessment may be offset with existing net operating losses and tax credits available to the Spanish consolidated tax group, which would be shared between the Company and Alcoa Corporation as provided for in the Tax Matters Agreement.
In the third quarter of 2018, Arconic established an income tax reserve, and an indemnification receivable representing Alcoa Corporation’s 49% share of the liability. As of the end of 2019, the balances of the reserve, including interest, and the receivable are $59 million (€53 million) and $29 million (€26 million), respectively.
Additionally, while the tax years 2010 through 2013 are closed to audit, it is possible that the Company may receive assessments for tax years subsequent to 2013. Any potential assessment for an individual tax year is not expected to be material

to the Company’s consolidated operations. At this time, the Company is unable to reasonably predict an ultimate outcome for this matter.
Matters Previously Reported – Alcoa Corporation
We have included the matters discussed below in which the Company remains party to proceedings relating to Alcoa Corporation in accordance with SEC regulations. The Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated October 31, 2016, entered into between the Company and Alcoa Corporation in connection with the Separation of Alcoa, provides for cross-indemnities between the Company and Alcoa Corporation for claims subject to indemnification. The Company does not expect any of such matters to result in a net claim against it.
St. Croix Proceedings
Red Dust Docket Cases, (St. Croix) f/k/a Abednego, Laurie L.A., et al. v. St. Croix Alumina, L.L.C., et al.As previously reported, on January 14, 2010, Arconic was served with a multi-plaintiff action complaint involving several thousand individual persons claiming to be residents of St. Croix who are alleged to have suffered personal injury or property damage from Hurricane Georges or winds blowing material from the St. Croix Alumina, L.L.C. (“SCA”) facility on the island of St. Croix (U.S. Virgin Islands) since the time of the hurricane. This complaint, Abednego, et al. v. Alcoa, et al. was filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, St. Croix Division. Following an unsuccessful attempt by Arconic and SCA to remove the case to federal court, the case has been lodged in the Superior Court. The complaint names as defendants the same entities that were sued in a February 1999 action arising out of the impact of Hurricane Georges on the island and added as a defendant the current owner of the alumina facility property.
Also as previously reported, on March 1, 2012, Arconic was served with a separate multi-plaintiff action complaint involving approximately 200 individual persons alleging claims essentially identical to those set forth in the Abednego v. Alcoa complaint. This complaint, Abraham, et al. v. Alcoa, et al., was filed on behalf of plaintiffs previously dismissed in the federal court proceeding involving the original litigation over Hurricane Georges impacts. The matter was originally filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, St. Croix Division, on March 30, 2011.
Arconic and other defendants in the Abraham and Abednego cases filed or renewed motions to dismiss each case in March 2012 and August 2012 following service of the Abraham complaint on Arconic and remand of the Abednego complaint to Superior Court, respectively. By order dated August 10, 2015, the Superior Court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaints without prejudice to re-file the complaints individually, rather than as a multi-plaintiff filing. The order also preserves the defendants’ grounds for dismissal if new, individual complaints are filed. On July 7, 2017, the Court issued an order and associated memoranda on plaintiff’s multiple motions for extension of time to file the individual Complaints. Following the court’s July 7, 2017 order, a total of 429 complaints were filed and accepted by the court by the deadline of July 30, 2017 (and consolidated into the Red Dust Claims docket (Master Case No.: SX-15-CV-620)). These complaints include claims of about 1,260 individual plaintiffs.
On November 5, 2018, notice of an order of reassignment was entered, transferring the claims to the newly created Complex Litigation Division of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Croix. On January 28, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a motion asking for a determination that expert testimony will not be required on the issue of causation, which defendants opposed. The Court has not ruled on that motion.
Other Contingencies
In addition to the matters discussed above, various other lawsuits, claims, and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against Arconic, including those pertaining to environmental, product liability, safety and health, employment, tax and antitrust matters. While the amounts claimed in these other matters may be substantial, the ultimate liability cannot currently be determined because of the considerable uncertainties that exist. Therefore, it is possible that the Company’s liquidity or results of operations in a period could be materially affected by one or more of these other matters. However, based on facts currently available, management believes that the disposition of these other matters that are pending or asserted will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.

PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.Exchange under the symbol “HWM.” Prior to the Arconic Inc. Separation of Alcoa Corporation fromTransaction on April 1, 2020, the Company the Company’s common stock tradedwas known as Arconic Inc. and was listed under the symbol “AA.” In connection with the Separation of Alcoa, on November 1, 2016, the Company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol “ARNC.”
On October 5, 2016, the Company’s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock, without any change in the par value per share. The Reverse Stock Split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares, and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares. The Company’s common stock began trading on a Reverse Stock Split-adjusted basis on October 6, 2016.
On November 1, 2016, the Company completed the Separation of Alcoa. The Separation of Alcoa was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the Company of 80.1% of the outstanding shares of Alcoa Corporation common stock to the Company’s shareholders. The Company’s shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 20, 2016 (the “Record Date”) received one share of Alcoa Corporation common stock for every three shares of the Company’s common stock held as of the Record Date. The Company retained 19.9% of the outstanding common stock of Alcoa Corporation immediately following the Separation of Alcoa. See disposition of retained shares in Note U to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
In conjunction with the Separation of Arconic, the Company will remain publicly traded and will change its name to “Howmet Aerospace Inc.” (“Howmet Aerospace”) and its stock symbol from “ARNC” to “HWM”, and “Arconic Rolled Products Corporation” will change its name to “Arconic Corporation” and its common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARNC.”
The number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 10,8749,404 as of February 21, 2020.13, 2023.

16


Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of the Company’s common stock with (1) the Standard & Poor’s (S&P)(“S&P”) 500® Index, (2) the S&P 500® Industrials Index, a group of 70 companies categorized by Standard & Poor’s as active in the “industrials” market sector, and (3) the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, a group of 32 companies categorized by Standard & Poor’s as active in the “aerospace & defense” industry. which comprises General Dynamics Corporation, Howmet Aerospace Inc., Huntington Ingalls Industries, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Lockheed Martin Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Textron Inc., The Boeing Company, and Transdigm Group Inc.
The graph assumes, in each case, an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2014,2017, and the reinvestment of dividends. HistoricalThe historical prices prior toof the Separation of Alcoa on November 1, 2016,Company presented in the graph and table have been adjusted to reflect the valueimpact of the April 2020 Arconic Inc. Separation transaction.Transaction. Because the starting point of the graph is December 31, 2017, the effect of the November 2016 Alcoa Inc. Separation Transaction is already reflected in the Company’s stock price on December 31, 2017. The graph, table and related information shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.
hwm-20221231_g1.jpg


As of December 31,201720182019202020212022
Howmet Aerospace Inc.$100.00 $62.78 $115.45 $139.82 $156.14 $193.87 
S&P 500® Index
100.00 95.62 125.72 148.85 191.58 156.89 
S&P 500® Industrials Index
100.00 86.71 112.17 124.59 150.89 142.63 
S&P Aerospace & Defense Index100.00 91.93 119.81 100.56 113.86 133.64 

chart-4f98d85b54335241b43.jpg

Copyright© 2020 Standard & Poor's, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved.
17


As of December 31,2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Arconic Inc.$100
 $63.15
 $53.54
 $79.44
 $49.70
 $91.24
S&P 500® Index
100
 101.38
 113.51
 138.29
 132.23
 173.86
S&P 500® Industrials Index
100
 97.47
 115.85
 140.22
 121.58
 157.29
S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index100
 105.43
 125.36
 177.24
 162.93
 212.35


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period 
Total Number
of Shares Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Repurchase
Plans or
Programs(1)
 
Approximate
Dollar Value
of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs
October 1 - October 31, 2019 
 $
 
 $400,000,000
November 1 - November 30, 2019(2)
 1,626,681
 $30.74
 1,626,681
 $350,000,000
December 1 - December 31, 2019 
 $
 
 $350,000,000
Total for quarter ended
December 31, 2019
 1,626,681
      
The following table presents information with respect to the Company’s open-market repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2022:
PeriodTotal Number
of Shares Purchased
Average
Price Paid
Per Share(1)
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Repurchase
Plans or
Programs
Approximate
Dollar Value
of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs (in millions)(1)(2)
October 1 - October 31, 2022— $— — $1,012 
November 1 - November 30, 2022— $— — $1,012 
December 1 - December 31, 2022
1,677,711(3)
$38.83 1,674,082 $947 
Total for quarter ended December 31, 20221,677,711 $38.83 1,674,082 
(1)Excludes commissions cost.
(2)On February 5, 2018,August 18, 2021, the Company announced that its Board of Directors (the Board) had authorized thea share repurchase program of up to $500$1,500 million of the Company's outstanding common stockstock. After giving effect to the share repurchases made through the fourth quarter of 2022, approximately $947 million Board authorization remained available as of January 1, 2023. Under the Company’s share repurchase programs (the "February 2018 Share“Share Repurchase Program"Programs”)., the Company may repurchase shares by means of trading plans established from time to time in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, block trades, private transactions, open market repurchases and/or accelerated share repurchase agreements or other derivative transactions. There wasis no stated expiration for the February 2018 Share Repurchase Program, and no shares were repurchased during 2018. On February 8, 2019,Programs. Under its Share Repurchase Programs, the Company announced thatmay repurchase shares from time to time, in amounts, at prices, and at such times as the Board had authorizedCompany deems appropriate, subject to market conditions, legal requirements and other considerations. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any specific number of shares or to do so at any particular time, and the repurchaseShare Repurchase Programs may be suspended, modified or terminated at any time without prior notice.
(3)Amount includes the surrender of an additional $500 million3,629 shares of the Company's outstandingHowmet common stock effective throughby a participant in the end of 2020. On May 20, 2019,Company’s stock incentive plan to the Company announced thatto satisfy the Board had authorizedexercise price and tax withholding obligations of employee stock options at the repurchasetime of a further $500 millionexercise. These surrendered shares are not part of the Company's outstanding common stock (the "May 2019any Share Repurchase Program"). There was no stated expiration for the May 2019 Share Repurchase Program.Programs.

(2) On November 14, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. to repurchase $50 million of its common stock (the “November 2019 share repurchase program”), pursuant to the share repurchase programs previously authorized by its Board. All of the shares repurchased were immediately retired. After giving effect to the November 2019 share repurchase program, $350 million remains available under the prior authorizations by the Board for share repurchases through the end of 2020.



Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
(dollars in millions, except per-share amounts)Reserved.

18

For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Sales$14,192
 $14,014
 $12,960
 $12,394
 $12,413
Amounts attributable to Arconic:         
Income (loss) from continuing operations$470
 $642
 $(74) $(1,062) $(157)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
 
 
 121
 (165)
Net income (loss)$470
 $642
 $(74) $(941) $(322)
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Arconic common shareholders:         
Basic:         
Income (loss) from continuing operations$1.05
 $1.33
 $(0.28) $(2.58) $(0.54)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
 
 
 0.27
 (0.39)
Net income (loss)$1.05
 $1.33
 $(0.28) $(2.31) $(0.93)
Diluted:         
Income (loss) from continuing operations$1.03
 $1.30
 $(0.28) $(2.58) $(0.54)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
 
 
 0.27
 (0.39)
Net income (loss)$1.03
 $1.30
 $(0.28) $(2.31) $(0.93)
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.12
 $0.24
 $0.24
 $0.36
 $0.36
Total assets17,578
 18,693
 18,718
 20,038
 36,477
Total debt5,940
 6,330
 6,844
 8,084
 8,827
Cash provided from (used for) operations406
 217
 (39) 95
 764
Capital expenditures:         
Capital expenditures—continuing operations586
 768
 596
 827
 789
Capital expenditures—discontinued operations
 
 
 298
 391
Total capital expenditures$586
 $768
 $596
 $1,125
 $1,180

Effective November 1, 2016, Alcoa Inc. separated into two standalone, publicly-traded companies, Arconic Inc. (the new name for Alcoa Inc.) and Alcoa Corporation (the “Separation


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
(dollars in millions, except share and per-share amounts; shipmentsamounts)
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand our results of operations and financial condition. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in thousandsconjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of metric tons [kmt])this Form 10-K.
Overview
Our Business
Arconic Inc. (“Arconic” or the “Company”)Howmet is a global leader in lightweight metals engineering and manufacturing. Arconic’sHowmet’s innovative, multi-material products, which include nickel, titanium, aluminum, titanium, and nickel,cobalt, are used worldwide in the aerospace automotive,(commercial and defense), commercial transportation, building and construction, industrial applications, defense, and packaging.other markets.
ArconicHowmet is a global company operating in 1820 countries. Based upon the country where the point of saleshipment occurred, the United StatesNorth America and Europe generated 67%71% and 23%22%, respectively, of Arconic’sHowmet’s sales in 2019.2022. In addition, ArconicHowmet has operating activities in numerous countries and regions outside the United States,of North America and Europe, including Europe, Canada, China Japan, and Russia.Japan. Governmental policies, laws and regulations, and other economic factors, including inflation and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, affect the results of operations in countries with such operating activities.activities.
Management Review of 20192022 and Outlook
The Company derived approximately 46% of its revenue from products sold to the commercial aerospace market for the Futureyear ended December 31, 2022 which is substantially less than the pre-pandemic 2019 annual rate of approximately 60%. Due to the global COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the commercial aerospace industry to date, there has been a decrease in domestic and international air travel, which in turn has adversely affected demand for narrow-body and wide-body aircraft. Although domestic air travel now approximates pre-pandemic levels, China domestic air travel is still below pre-pandemic 2019 levels on an average monthly basis in 2022. International travel also continues to be lower than pre-pandemic 2019 levels. We expect commercial aerospace growth to continue, with narrow-body demand returning faster than wide-body demand. The commercial wide-body aircraft market is taking longer to recover, which is creating a shift in our product mix compared to pre-pandemic conditions. In addition to the impact from the pandemic, the timing and level of future aircraft builds by OEMs are subject to changes and uncertainties, such as declines in Boeing 787 production rates due to delays in its recertification, which may cause our future results to differ from prior periods due to changes in product mix in certain segments.
In 2019,2022, Sales increased 1%14% over 20182021 primarily as a result of volume growthhigher sales in the commercial aerospace packaging, commercial transportation, and industrial end markets;market, an increase in material cost pass through of $225, and favorable product pricing in the Global Rolled Products (GRP) and Engineered Products and Forgings (EP&F) segments;of $67, partially offset by lower aluminum prices;sales in the defense aerospace market. Price increases are in excess of material and inflationary cost pass through to our customers.
Income from continuing operations before income taxes increased 87% from 2021. Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA(1) increased 13% from 2021 due to favorable sales in the commercial aerospace market, cost reductions, and favorable product pricing, partially offset by Boeing 787 production declines and lower sales of $216 from divestitures of forgings businesses in the United Kingdom (divested in December 2019)defense aerospace market and Eger, Hungary (divested in December 2018), Latin America extrusions (divested in April 2018), and the completed ramp down of Arconic's North American packaging operations (in December 2018). In the segments, Segment operating profit increased 27% from 2018 due to favorable product pricing, net cost savings, lower raw material costs including aluminum price, and higher volumes, partially offset by the impact of the Tennessee plant transition to industrial production, operational challenges at one aluminum extrusions plant, and higher variable compensationinflationary costs.
Management continued its focus on liquidity and cash flows as well as improving its operating performance through cost reductions, streamlined organizational structures, margin enhancement, and profitable revenue, generation.efficient operations, and margin enhancement. Management has also continued its intensified focus on capital efficiency. ThisManagement’s focus and the related results enabled ArconicHowmet to end 20192022 with a solid financial position.
The following financial information reflects certain key highlights of Arconic’s 2019Howmet’s 2022 results:
Sales of $14,192, up 1%$5,663, an increase of 14% from 2018,2021, with growthhigher sales in key end markets, and the commercial aerospace market;
Net income from continuing operations of $470,$469, or $1.03$1.11 per diluted share;
Income from continuing operations before income taxes of $606, an increase of $282, or 87%, from 2021;
Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $1,352, an increase of $152, or 13%, from 2021;
Total segment operating profit of $2,015, an increase of $429, or 27%, from 20181;
Cash provided from operations of $406; cash used for financing activities of $1,568, reflecting the Company’s repurchase of $1,150 of its common stock and the repayment of convertible notes in 2019; and cash provided from investing activities of $583;
Cash on hand and restricted cash at the end of the year of $1,648;$792;
Cash provided from operations of $733; cash used for financing activities of $526; and cash used for investing activities of $135;
Purchased approximately 11 million shares of Common Stock under the Share Repurchase Programs for approximately $400;
19


Total debt of $5,940,$4,162, a decrease of $390$70 from 2018,2021, reflecting repaymentrepurchases of $403$69 of convertible notesthe 5.125% Notes due October 2024 (the “5.125% Notes”) during 2022; and
The Company’s common stock had a closing price of $39.41 per share at December 30, 2022, an increase of $26.21 per share, or 199%, since the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction on April 1, 2020, compared to an increase of 55% for both the S&P 500® Index and S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index over the same period.
(1)See below in October 2019.
(1) ForResults of Operations for the reconciliation of Total segment operating profitSegment Adjusted EBITDA to Consolidated incomeIncome from continuing operations before income taxestaxes.
In 2023, management projects sales to increase as we expect solid growth in the commercial aerospace market, and related information, see page 43.
The Company rapidly executedthe Company’s strong position in that market is expected to continue. Earnings per share is expected to grow as management continues to focus on operational performance. Cash provided from operations is expected to increase for the separation plan that was announcedfull year in February 20192023 compared with 2022, resulting from a continued focus on operating performance and is targeting completion of the separation on April 1, 2020. The company will separate into two independent, publicly-traded companies,capital efficiency. Capital expenditures are expected to be named Howmet Aerospace Inc. (Remain Co.)less than depreciation and Arconic Corporation (Spin Co.) (the “Separation of Arconic”). Remain Co. will be comprised of the Company’s Engineered Products and Forgings businesses (engine products, fastening systems, engineered structures and forged wheels) and will be renamed Howmet Aerospace Inc. at separation and change its stock ticker from “ARNC” to “HWM.”  Spin Co. will be comprised of the Company’s Global Rolled Products businesses (global rolled products, aluminum extrusions and building and construction systems) and will be held by a new company that will be named Arconic Corporation at separation and that intends to list its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARNC.” 
On February 5, 2020, Arconic’s Board of Directors approved the completion of the Separation of Arconic by means of a pro rata distribution by the Company of all of the outstanding common stock of Arconic Corporation, with each Arconic Inc. stockholder of record as of the close of business on March 19, 2020 receiving one share of Arconic Corporation common stock for every four shares of the Company’s common stock held as of the record date.  On February 7, 2020, the Company announced that Arconic Rolled Products Corporation (the “Issuer”), which is currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of Arconic,

closed its offering of $600 aggregate principal amount of 6.125% second-lien notes due 2028.  The proceeds will be used to make a payment to Arconic to fund the transfer of certain assets to the Issuer in connection with the separation and for general corporate purposes.  On February 13, 2020, the Registration Statement on Form 10 for Arconic Rolled Products Corporation was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In conjunction with the Separation of Arconic, the Company realigned its reporting segments in the third quarter of 2019 by eliminating its Transportation and Construction Solutions segment and transferring the forged wheels business to the EP&F segment and transferring the building and construction systems business to the GRP segment. The Company also executed on its plan to sell businesses that do not best fit into one of its two segments, having signed or closed on divestitures in 2019 resulting in proceeds of approximately $190.amortization.
Results of Operations
Earnings Summary
Sales. Sales for 20192022 were $14,192$5,663 compared with $14,014$4,972 in 2018,2021, an increase of $178,$691, or 1%14%. The increase was primarily due to volumehigher sales in the commercial aerospace market, an increase in material cost pass through of $225, and favorable product pricing of $67, partially offset by lower sales in the defense aerospace market. Price increases are in excess of material and inflationary pass through to our customers.
Sales for 2021 were $4,972 compared with $5,259 in 2020, a decrease of $287, or 5%. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales in the commercial aerospace market driven by the impact of COVID-19 and Boeing 787 production declines and lower sales in the defense aerospace market, partially offset by growth in the aerospace, packaging, commercial transportation and industrial end markets;gas turbine markets as well as favorable product pricing of $97. Price increases are in excess of material and mix in the GRP segment; and favorable product pricing in the EP&F segment when fulfilling volume above contractual share, renewing contracts, and selling non-contractual spot business; partially offset by lower aluminum prices; lower sales of $216 from the completed ramp down of Arconic's North American packaging operations (in December 2018) and the divestitures of forgings businesses in the United Kingdom (divested in December 2019) and Hungary (divested in December 2018), and the Latin America extrusions business (divested in April 2018); and unfavorable foreign currency movements.
Sales for 2018 were $14,014 compared with $12,960 in 2017, an increase of $1,054, or 8%. The increase was the result of strong volume growth across both segments, primarily in the aerospace engines and defense, automotive, commercial transportation, industrial, and building and construction end markets; higher aluminum prices and favorable product mix primarily in the GRP segment; and favorable foreign currency movements; partially offset by a decline in volumes in the industrial gas turbine end market; lower sales of $190 from the divestitures of the Latin America extrusions business, the rolling mill in Fusina, Italy (divested in March 2017), and the ramp down of Arconic's North American packaging operations; and costs of $38 in 2018 relatedinflationary cost pass through to settlements of certain customer claims primarily related to product introductions.our customers.
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)goods sold (“COGS”). COGS as a percentage of Sales was 79.1%72.5% in 20192022 compared with 81.3%72.3% in 2018.2021. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to lower raw materialincreased costs including aluminum prices; net cost savings; favorable product pricing; and costs incurred in 2018 that did not recur in 2019 related to settlements of certain customer claims of $38 noted abovethree plant fires, as well as material cost pass through and a charge related to a physical inventory adjustment at one plantincreased net headcount, primarily in the GRP segmentEngine Products and Fastening Systems segments, in anticipation of $23. These positive impacts werefuture revenue increases, partially offset by unfavorablehigher volumes and favorable product mix; a charge for environmental remediation at Grasse Riverpricing. The Company had total COGS charges of $25; the impairment$59 in 2022, offset by partial insurance claims reimbursements of energy business assets of $10; and a charge primarily for a one-time signing bonus for employees associated with the collective bargaining agreement negotiation of $9. In June of 2019 the Company and the United Steelworkers reached a tentative three-year labor agreement covering approximately 3,400 employees at four U.S. locations; the previous labor agreement expired on May 15, 2019. The tentative agreement was ratified on July 11, 2019. Additionally,$23, related to fires that occurred in 2019 the Company sustained a fire at a fastenersFastening Systems plant in France (the “France Plant Fire”), at a Forged Wheels plant in Barberton, Ohio in mid-February 2020 (the “Barberton Plant Fire”), and recordeda mechanical failure resulting in substantial heat and fire-related damage to equipment at the Company’s cast house in Barberton, Ohio in the third quarter of 2022 (the “Barberton Cast House Incident”), compared to total COGS charges of $26 for higher operating costs, equipment$28 in 2021, offset by partial insurance claims reimbursements of $32, related to the France Plant Fire and inventory damage, and repairs and cleanup costs.the Barberton Plant Fire. The Company submitted an insurance claim and received a partial settlement of $25, which wasclaims related to these three plant fires were in excess of its $10the insurance deductible. TheDuring the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company settled the insurance claim included $8 of margin not recognized from lost revenue duerelated to the fire.Barberton Plant Fire. The downtime related to these plant fires in 2022 and 2021 reduced production levels and affected productivity at the plants. The Company anticipates a chargeadditional charges related to these plant fires of approximately $5 to $10 to $15 in the first quarter of 2020, with additional impacts in subsequent quarters as the business continues to recover from the fire, which are also expected to be covered by insurance proceeds.2023.
COGS as a percentage of Sales was 81.3%72.3% in 20182021 compared with 78.9%73.7% in 2017.2020. The increasedecrease was primarily due to structural cost reductions and favorable product pricing. Additionally, the result of higher aluminum prices; unfavorable aerospace product mix; higher transportation costs; manufacturing inefficiencies in Engineered Structures; performance shortfalls in the Disks asset group; costs related to settlements of certain customerCompany submitted insurance claims noted above; and the impact of a charge related to a physical inventory adjustment at one plant in the GRP segment of $23 that was recorded in the second quarter of 2018. While a portion of this charge for the physical inventory adjustment related to prior years, the majority related to the first halfFrance Plant Fire and Barberton Plant Fire and received partial settlements of 2018.$32 in 2021 compared to $39 in 2020, which were in excess of the insurance deductibles. In 2021, the Company recorded charges of $28 related to plant fires compared to $41 in 2020. The out-of-period amounts were not material to any interim or annual periods.downtime reduced production levels and affected productivity at the plants.
Selling, General Administrative,general administrative, and Other Expenses (SG&A)other expenses (“SG&A”). SG&A expenses were $704,$288, or 5.1% of Sales, in 2022 compared with $251, or 5.0% of Sales, in 2019 compared with $604, or 4.3% of Sales, in 2018.2021. The increase in SG&A of $100,$37, or 17%15%, was primarily due to higher employment, travel, and lease costs associated with the planned Separation of Arconic of $78 and higher annual incentive compensation accruals and executive compensation costs, partially offset by lower costs driven by overhead cost reductions and lower netin 2022, as well as legal and other advisory costs related to Grenfell Tower of $10, primarily due to insurance reimbursements.reimbursements received in 2021 that did not recur in 2022.
SG&A expenses were $604,$251, or 4.3%5.0% of Sales, in 20182021 compared with $715,$277, or 5.5%5.3% of Sales, in 2017.2020. The decrease in SG&A of $111,$26, or 16%9%, was the result of proxy, advisoryprimarily due to overhead cost reductions in 2021 and governance-related costs of $58, costs related to the Separation of Alcoa Inc. of $18, and costsincurred in 2020 associated with the Company’s Delaware reincorporation of $3Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction that did not recur in 2017, none of which recurred in 2018.

Additionally, lower expenses driven by lower annual incentive compensation accruals and overhead cost reductions were somewhat offset by an increase in legal and other advisory costs related to Grenfell Tower of $4 as well as strategy and portfolio review costs of $7 in 2018.2021.
Research and Development Expenses (R&D)development expenses (“R&D”). R&D expenses were $70$32 in 20192022 compared with $103$17 in 2018.2021. The decreaseincrease of $33,$15, or 32%88%, was primarily due to the consolidation of the Company's primary R&D facility in conjunction with ongoing cost reduction efforts.higher spending on technology projects across all segments.
R&D expenses were $103$17 in 2018 compared with $109 in 2017. The decreaseboth 2021 and 2020.
20


Provision for Depreciationdepreciation and Amortization (D&A)amortization (“D&A”). The provision for D&A was $536$265 in 20192022 compared with $576$270 in 2018.2021. The decrease of $40,$5, or 7%2%, was primarily driven by lower corporate software amortization and reduced depreciation due to the impactsale of divestitures,the corporate center.
The provision for D&A was $270 in 2021 compared with $279 in 2020. The decrease of $9, or 3%, was primarily driven by lower corporate software amortization and research center depreciation as well as asset impairments$1 of D&A related to the Barberton Plant Fire in 2021 compared to $6 in 2020.
Restructuring and other charges. Restructuring and other charges were $56 in 2022 compared with $90 in 2021 and $182 in 2020.
Restructuring and other charges in 2022 consisted primarily of a $58 charge for U.S. and United Kingdom (“U.K.��) pension plans' settlement accounting and a $6 charge for various other exit costs. These charges were partially offset by a gain of $8 on the sale of assets at a small U.S. manufacturing facility in Engine Products. The Company has closed some small manufacturing facilities and may in the EP&F segment duringfuture close additional small facilities in order to consolidate operations, reduce fixed costs, and exit less profitable businesses.
Restructuring and other charges in 2021 consisted primarily of a $75 charge for U.K. and U.S. pension plans’ settlement accounting, a $15 charge for accelerated depreciation primarily related to the second quarterclosure of 2019 (see small U.S. manufacturing facilities in Engine Products and Fastening Systems, a $7 charge for layoff costs, a $4 charge for impairment of assets associated with an agreement to sell a small manufacturing business in France, and a $4 charge for various other exit costs. These charges were partially offset by a gain of $12 on the sale of assets at a small U.S. manufacturing facility in Fastening Systems and a benefit of $3 related to the reversal of a number of layoff reserves related to prior periods.
Restructuring and other charges in 2020 consisted primarily of a $113charge for layoff costs, a $74 charge for U.K. and U.S. pension plans' settlement accounting, a $5 post-closing adjustment related to the sale of the Company’s U.K. forgings business, a $5 charge for impairment of assets associated with an agreement to sell an aerospace components business in the U.K, which ultimately did not occur and the business was returned to held for use, and a $5 charge related to the impairment of a cost method investment. These charges were partially offset by a benefit of $21 related to the reversal of a number of prior period programs.
Impairment of Goodwill. 8In 2017, the Company recognized an impairment of goodwill of $719 related to the annual impairment review of its Arconic Forgings and Extrusions (AFE) business (see Goodwill under Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates below).
Restructuring and Other Charges. Restructuring and other charges were $620 in 2019 compared with $9 in 2018 and $165 in 2017.
Restructuring and other charges in 2019 primarily included asset impairments of $556, related to the Disks asset group of $428, agreements to sell the Company’s Brazilian rolling mill operations, the U.K. forgings business, and a small additive business of $112, and a trade name intangible asset and properties, plant, and equipment related to the Company’s primary research and development facility of $25; and a charge for layoff costs of $103, including the separation of approximately 1,310 employees; partially offset by a benefit from the elimination of the life insurance benefit for the U.S. salaried and non-bargaining hourly retirees of the Company and its subsidiaries of $58; and a gain for contingent consideration received from the sale of the Texarkana rolling mill of $20.
Restructuring and other charges in 2018 primarily included a charge for pension and other postretirement benefits net settlements and curtailments of $91; a loss on the sale of the Hungary forgings business of $43; and a charge for layoff costs of $20, including the separation of approximately 125 employees; partially offset by a gain on the asset sale of the Texarkana rolling mill of $154.
Restructuring and other charges in 2017 primarily included a charge for layoff costs of $69, including the separation of approximately 880 employees; a charge related to the sale of the Italy rolling mill of $60; and a charge for the impairment of assets associated with the sale of the Latin America extrusions business of $41.
See Note C to the to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K.
Interest Expense.expense, net. Interest expense, net was $338$229 in 20192022 compared with $378$259 in 2018.2021. The decrease of $40,$30, or 11%12%, was primarily due to lowera reduced average level of debt outstanding, driven byfor the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021. On an annual basis, the partial repayment of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 1.63% Convertible5.125% Notes ofin 2022 will decrease Interest expense, net by approximately $403 on October 15, 2019, as well as costs incurred of $19 in 2018 related to the premium paid on the early redemption of the Company’s then outstanding 5.72% Senior Notes due 2019 that did not recur in 2019.$4.
Interest expense, net was $378$259 in 20182021 compared with $496$317 in 2017.2020. The decrease of $118,$58, or 24%18%, was the result of higher costs incurred in 2017 related to the early redemption of the Company’s outstanding debt than were incurred during 2018, as well as lower debt outstanding.
Other Expense (Income), Net. Other expense, net was $122 in 2019 compared with $79 in 2018. The increase of $43 was primarily due to an increase in deferred compensation arrangements and related investment performance anda reduced average level of debt for the benefit recognized in 2018 from establishing a tax indemnification receivable reflecting Alcoa Corporation’s 49% share of a Spanish tax reserve of $29 that did not recur in 2019, partially offset by favorable foreign currency movements.
Other expense, net was $79 in 2018year ended December 31, 2021 compared with Other income, net of $486 in 2017. The decrease in Other income, net of $565 was the result of gains recorded during 2017 related to the sale of a portion of Arconic’s investment in Alcoa Corporation common stock of $351, the Debt-for-Equity Exchange (in April and May 2017, the Company acquired a portion of its outstanding notes held by two investment banks (the “Investment Banks”) in exchange for cash and the Company’s remaining 12,958,767 shares (valued at $35.91 per share) in Alcoa Corporation stock and recorded a gain of $167), income associated with an adjustment to the contingent earn-out liability related to the Firth Rixson acquisition of $81 (see year ended December 31, 2020.
See Note RS to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K), and10-K.

incomeLoss on debt redemption.Debt redemption or tender premiums include the cost to redeem or repurchase certain of the Company’s notes at a price which may be equal to the greater of the principal amount or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments, discounted using a defined treasury rate plus a spread, or a price based on the market price of its notes. Loss on debt redemption was $2 in 2022 compared with $146 in 2021. The decrease of $144 was primarily due to higher debt premiums paid in 2021 related to the reversalrepurchases of a liability associatedthe 6.875% Notes due 2025 (the “6.875% Notes”), the 5.870% Notes due 2022, and the 5.125% Notes.
Loss on debt redemption was $146 in 2021 compared with a separation-related guarantee$64 in 2020. The increase of $25, none of which recurred$82, or 128%, was primarily due to debt premiums paid in 2018, and unfavorable foreign currency movements, somewhat2021 on the 6.875% Notes, partially offset by lower non-service related net periodic benefit costdebt redemption or tender premiums, as applicable, paid in 2020 on the repurchases of the 6.150% Notes due 2020 (the “6.150% Notes”) and the benefit of $29 from establishing a tax indemnification receivable reflecting Alcoa Corporation’s 49% share of a Spanish tax reserve (see 5.400% Notes due 2021.
See Note RT to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K).10-K.
Other expense, net. Other expense, net was $82 in 2022 compared with $19 in 2021. The increase in expense of $63 was primarily driven by the adverse judgment of $65 related to Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (“LBIE”) swaps that were entered into in 2007 and 2008, which were assumed as part of the Firth Rixson acquisition in 2014, an increase from net realized and unrealized losses of $9, primarily related to mark-to-market adjustments on exchange-traded fixed income securities and losses on sales of receivables, and higher non-service related net periodic benefit costs related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2022 of $7, partially offset by the impacts of deferred compensation arrangements of $16
21


and higher interest income of $4. Non-service related net periodic benefit costs related to defined benefit plans is expected to increase by approximately $20 from 2022 to 2023.
Other expense, net was $19 in 2021 compared with $74 in 2020. The decrease in expense of $55 was primarily driven by the write-off of an indemnification receivable of $53 related to a Spanish tax reserve, reflecting Alcoa Corporation's 49% share and Arconic Corporation's 33.66% share, that occurred in 2020 and did not occur in 2021 and lower non-service related net periodic benefit costs related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2021 of $17, which were partially offset by an increase in foreign currency gains of $13. Non-service related net periodic benefit costs related to defined benefit plans declined approximately 65% from 2020 to 2021.
Income Taxes.taxes. Arconic’sHowmet’s effective tax rate was 18.3%22.6% (provision on pre-tax income) in 20192022 compared with the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21%. The effective rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily as a result of a $94 net$12 charge related to an increase in the valuation allowance on a foreign tax credit carryforward in the U.S., $8 of charges related to U.S. tax on Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) and other foreign earnings, $8 of charges related to nondeductible expenses, and $5 of incremental state tax and foreign taxes on earnings also subject to U.S. federal income tax, partially offset by a $6 benefit for the release of a valuation allowance on interest deduction carryforwards in the U.K., a $5 benefit related to a U.S. tax election which caused the deemed liquidation ofaccounting method change, a foreign subsidiary’s assets into its U.S. tax parent,$5 excess benefit for stock compensation, and a $24 net$3 benefit associated with the deductionrelated to a distribution of foreign taxes that were previously claimed asearnings. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “Act”) was signed into law on August 16, 2022. The Act includes various tax provisions, including a U.S. foreign1% excise tax credit,on stock repurchases, expanded tax credits for clean energy incentives, and a $12 net benefit for foreigncorporate alternative minimum tax that generally applies to U.S. corporations with average adjusted financial statement income over a three-year period in excess of $1,000. The Company does not expect the Act to materially impact its financial statements. Howmet anticipates that the effective tax rate changes, partially offset by the tax impact of $89 of non-deductible executive compensationin 2023 will be between 22.5% and transaction costs, $53 of impairment charges related to the Company’s Brazilian rolling mill operations and other foreign losses with no tax benefit, a $14 charge for U.S. state taxes, and by foreign income subject to U.S. taxes.23.5%.
Arconic’sHowmet’s effective tax rate was 26.0%20.4% (provision on pre-tax income) in 20182021 compared with the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21%. The effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily as a result of a $60 charge to establish a tax reserve in Spain, a $59 net charge resulting$32 benefit from the Company’s finalized analysisrecognition of income tax credits related to development incentives in Hungary, and a $9 benefit related to updated U.S. regulatory guidance concerning the utilization of foreign tax credits in connection with the one-time transition tax on the deemed repatriation of previously non-taxed post-1986 earnings and profits of certain foreign subsidiaries enacted as part of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs ActsAct of 2017 ("the 2017 Act"(the “2017 Act”), partially offset by $9 of charges from the decision to no longer permanently reinvest earnings in certain foreign subsidiaries, $7 of charges from distributions of foreign earnings, $8 of charges to establish a $13 charge forvaluation allowance on certain net operating losses in Switzerland, $6 of charges related to U.S. state taxes,tax on foreign income, taxed in higher rate jurisdictions, and other impacts related to nondeductible expenses including foreign losses with no tax benefit, partially offset by a $74 benefit related to the reversal of a foreign recapture obligation, a $38 benefit to reverse a foreign tax reserve that is effectively settled, and a $10 benefit for the release of U.S. valuation allowances.benefit.
Arconic’sHowmet’s effective tax rate was 115.7%23.4% (benefit on pre-tax income) in 20172020 compared with the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%21%. The effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily as a result of a $719 impairment of goodwill, a $41 impairment of assets in the Latin America extrusions business, and a $60 charge related to the sale of a rolling mill in Italy that are nondeductible for income tax purposes, a $272 tax charge as a provisional impact of the 2017 Act, and a $23 tax charge for an increase in an uncertain tax position in Germany, partially offset by a $73 tax$64 benefit related to the salerelease of an income tax reserve following a favorable Spanish tax case decision, a $30 benefit related to the recognition of a previously uncertain U.S. tax position, and Debt-for-Equity Exchangea $30 benefit for a U.S. tax law change related to the issuance of final regulations that provide for an exclusion of certain high-taxed foreign earnings from the calculation of GILTI, partially offset by U.S. tax on foreign earnings, $8 of charges related to the remeasurement of deferred tax balances as a result of the Alcoa Corporation stock, a $69 tax benefit forArconic Inc. Separation Transaction, the release of U.S. state valuation allowances net of the federal tax benefit, a $27 favorable tax impact of $49 of nondeductible loss related to the reversal of indemnification receivables associated with a non-taxable earn-out liability adjustment in connection with the Firth Rixson acquisition, and by foreign income taxed in lower rate jurisdictions. Arconic’s effectivefavorable Spanish tax rate was 356.5% in 2016 compared with the U.S. fed
Arconic anticipates that the effective tax rate in 2020 will be between 26.5% and 28.5%. However, the planned Separation of Arconic, other business portfolio actions, changes in the current economic environment, tax legislation or rate changes, currency fluctuations, ability to realize deferred tax assets, movements in stock price impacting tax benefits or deficiencies on stock-based payment awards,case decision, and the resultstax impact of operations in certain taxing jurisdictions may cause this estimated rate to fluctuate.other nondeductible expenses.
Net Income.income from continuing operations. Net incomefrom continuing operations was $470 for 2019,$469, or $1.03$1.11 per diluted share, for 2022 compared to Net income of $642 for 2018,$258, or $1.33$0.59 per share.diluted share, in 2021. The decreaseincrease in results of $172$211, or 82%, was primarily due to higher sales in the commercial aerospace market, a decrease in the Loss on debt redemption of $144, favorable product pricing of $67, a decrease of $34 in Restructuring and other charges; higher SG&A expenses due to costs associated with the planned Separation of Arconic of $70 ($78 before-tax)charges, and higher annual incentive compensation accruals and executive compensation costs; and higher Othera decrease in Interest expense, net due toof $30, partially offset by lower sales in the defense aerospace market, an increase in deferred compensation arrangements and related investment performance andother inflationary costs, the benefit recognized in 2018 from establishing a tax indemnification receivable reflecting Alcoa Corporation’s 49% share of a Spanish tax reserve of $28 ($29 before-tax) that did not recur in 2019; partially offset by volume growth; favorable product pricing; net cost savings; lower D&A due to the impact of divestitures as well as asset impairments in the EP&F segment; lower Interest expense due to lower debt outstanding and costs incurred of $15 ($19 before-tax) in 2018adverse judgment related to the premium paid onLBIE legal proceeding of $65, and an increase in the early redemption of debt that did not recur in 2019; lower R&D expenses due to the consolidation of the Company's primary R&D facility in conjunction with ongoing cost reduction efforts; and lower IncomeProvision for income taxes primarily as a result of a benefit related to a U.S. tax election which caused the deemed liquidation of a foreign subsidiary’s assets into its U.S. tax parent.driven by an increase in income before income taxes.
Net incomefrom continuing operations was $642 for 2018,$258, or $1.30$0.59 per diluted share, for 2021 compared to a Net loss of $74 for 2017,$211, or $0.28$0.48 per share.diluted share, in 2020. The increase in results of $716$47, or 22%, was due in part to the following items that occurred in 2017 but did not recur in 2018: a charge for goodwill impairment of $719 ($719 pre-tax); gains related to the sale of a portion of Arconic’s investment in Alcoa Corporation common stock and the Debt-for-Equity Exchange of $405 ($518 pre-tax); and favorable adjustments to contingent earn-out and guarantee liabilities of $97 ($106 pre-tax). Additional favorable impacts in 2018 included: volume growth across both segments; lower SG&A expensesprimarily due to proxy and separation costs incurredcost reductions, a decrease of $92 in 2017 and not recurring in 2018, as well as lower incentive compensation accruals; lower Restructuring and other charges, driven primarily by the gain on saleand a decrease of the Texarkana rolling mill, offset by pension settlement charges and the loss on sale of the forgings business$58 in Hungary; lower Interest expense, net, due to lower long-term debt levels; lower pension expenses; and lower Income taxes. These favorable impacts werelevels, partially offset by unfavorable aerospace product mix, higher aluminum prices, manufacturing inefficiencies in Engineered Structures, performance shortfallslower sales in the Disks asset group, settlements of certain customer claims,commercial aerospace and defense aerospace market, an increase in the Provision for income taxes, and an unfavorable physical inventory adjustment at one plant.increase in the Loss on debt redemption of $82.

Net income. Net income was $469 for 2022, all of which was composed of $469 of income from continuing operations, or $1.11 per diluted share.
Net income was $258 for 2021, all of which was composed of $258 of income from continuing operations, or $0.59 per diluted share.
22


Net income was $261 for 2020, composed of $211 of income from continuing operations and $50 from discontinued operations as a result of the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction, or $0.48 and $0.11 per diluted share, respectively.
See details of discontinued operations in Note C to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K.
Segment Information
Arconic’sThe Company’s operations consist of twofour worldwide reportable segments: Engine Products, Fastening Systems, Engineered ProductsStructures and Forgings (EP&F) and Global Rolled Products (GRP).Forged Wheels. Segment performance under Arconic’sHowmet’s management reporting system is evaluated based on a number of factors; however, the primary measure of performance is Segment Adjusted EBITDA. Prior to the first quarter of 2022, the Company used Segment operating profit. Arconic’sprofit as its primary measure of performance. However, the Company’s CEO believes that Segment Adjusted EBITDA is now a better representation of its business because it provides additional information with respect to the Company’s operating performance and the Company’s ability to meet its financial obligations. Howmet’s definition of Segment operating profitAdjusted EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) is Operating income excluding Special items.net margin plus an add-back for depreciation and amortization. Net margin is equivalent to Sales minus the following items: Cost of goods sold; Selling, general administrative, and other expenses; Research and development expenses; and Provision for depreciation and amortization. Special items, includeincluding Restructuring and other charges, are excluded from Net margin and Impairment of goodwill. Segment operating profitAdjusted EBITDA. Segment Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Differences between the total segment totals and consolidated Arconictotals are in Corporate.
In the third quarter of 2019, the Company realigned its operations by eliminating its Transportation and Construction Solutions (TCS) segment and transferring the Forged Wheels business to its EP&F segment and the Building and Solutions Systems (BCS) business to its GRP segment, consistent with how the Chief Executive Officer is assessing operating performance and allocating capital in conjunction with the planned Separation of ArconicCorporate (see Note DU to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K). The Latin America extrusions business, which was formerly part of the Company's TCS segment until its sale in April of 2018 (see Note S to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K), was moved to Corporate. In the first quarter of 2019, management transferred its aluminum extrusions operations from its Engineered Structures business unit within the EP&F segment to the GRP segment, based on synergies with the GRP segment including similar customer base, technologies, and manufacturing capabilities. Prior period financial information has been recast to conform to current year presentation.
ArconicThe Company has aligned its operations consistent with how the CEO assesses operating performance and allocates capital.
The Company produces aerospace engine parts and components and aerospace fastening systems and aluminum sheet and plate products for Boeing 737 MAX airplanes. The temporary reductionFrom late December 2019 and throughout 2020, Boeing suspended production of 737 MAX airplanes. While regulatory authorities in the production rateUnited States and certain other jurisdictions lifted grounding orders beginning in late 2020, our sales remained at lower levels throughout 2021 due to the residual impacts of the 737 MAX airplanes that was announced by Boeing in April 2019 did not have a significant impact on the Company's sales or segment operating profit in 2019. In late December 2019, Boeing announced a temporary suspension of production ofgrounding. Sales related to the 737 MAX improved in 2022 year over year, contributing to commercial aerospace growth.
The Company also produces aerospace engine parts and components and aerospace fastening systems for Boeing 787 airplanes. In 2020,Boeing paused deliveries of its 787 aircraft between May 2021 and August 2022. As a result of the Company expects a reductionsignificant decline in Boeing 787 production raterates, our sales remained at lower levels throughout 2022. We expect increased sales related to have a negative impact on sales of approximately $400 along with a corresponding impact on segment operating profitthe Boeing 787 in the EP&F2023 year over year.
Income from continuing operations before income taxes totaled $606 in 2022, $324 in 2021, and GRP segments.
$171 in 2020. Segment operating profitAdjusted EBITDA for all reportable segments totaled $2,015$1,352 in 2019, $1,5862022, $1,200 in 2018,2021, and $1,689$1,152 in 2017. 2020. See below for the reconciliation of Income from continuing operations before income taxes to Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA.
The following information provides Sales, Segment Adjusted EBITDA, and Segment operating profitAdjusted EBITDA Margin for each reportable segment as well as certain shipment data for GRP, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019. See Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K.2022.
EngineeredEngine Products and Forgings
202220212020
Third-party sales$2,698 $2,282 $2,406 
Segment Adjusted EBITDA729 564 540 
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin27.0 %24.7 %22.4 %
 2019 2018 2017
Third-party sales$7,105
 $6,798
 $6,300
Segment operating profit$1,390
 $1,105
 $1,119
The EngineeredEngine Products and Forgings segment produces products that are used primarily in the aerospace (commercial and defense), industrial, commercial transportation, and power generation end markets. Such products include fastening systems (aluminum, titanium, steel, and nickel superalloys)investment castings, including airfoils, and seamless rolled rings (mostly nickel superalloys); investment castings (nickel superalloys, titanium,primarily for aircraft engines (aerospace commercial and aluminum)defense) and industrial gas turbines. Engine Products produces rotating parts as well as structural parts, which are sold directly to customers. Generally, the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations, which are mostly the U.S. dollar, British pound, euro, and Japanese yen.
Third-party sales for the Engine Products segment increased $416, or 18%, including airfoils; forged jet enginein 2022 compared with 2021, primarily due to higher volumes in the commercial aerospace and oil and gas markets as well as an increase in material cost pass through and favorable product pricing.
Third-party sales for the Engine Products segment decreased $124, or 5%, in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to lower volumes in the commercial aerospace market driven by the impact of COVID-19 and Boeing 787 production declines and lower volumes in the defense aerospace market, partially offset by higher volumes in the industrial gas turbine market.
23


Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the Engine Products segment increased $165, or 29%, in 2022 compared with 2021, primarily due to higher volumes in the commercial aerospace and oil and gas markets as well as productivity gains and favorable product pricing. The segment added approximately 950 net headcount since the end of 2021 in anticipation of revenue increases into 2023.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the Engine Products segment increased $24, or 4%, in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to cost reductions and favorable product pricing, partially offset by lower volumes in the commercial aerospace market driven by the impact of COVID-19 and Boeing 787 production declines, and lower volumes in the defense aerospace market.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the Engine Products segment increased approximately 230 basis points in 2022 compared with 2021, primarily due to higher volumes in the commercial aerospace and oil and gas markets as well as productivity gains, partially offset by an increase in material cost pass through.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the Engine Products segment increased approximately 230 basis points in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to cost reductions and favorable product pricing, partially offset by lower volumes in the commercial aerospace market driven by the impact of COVID-19 and Boeing 787 production declines, and lower volumes in the defense aerospace market.
In 2023, as compared to 2022, demand in the commercial aerospace, industrial gas turbine, and oil and gas markets is expected to increase. Additionally, an increase in other inflationary costs is expected to contribute to an increase in sales as the Company generally passes through these costs.
Fastening Systems
202220212020
Third-party sales$1,117 $1,044 $1,245 
Segment Adjusted EBITDA234 239 295 
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin20.9 %22.9 %23.7 %
Fastening Systems produces aerospace fastening systems, as well as commercial transportation fasteners. The business’s high-tech, multi-material fastening systems are found nose to tail on aircraft and aero engines. The business’s products are also critical components (e.g., jet engine disks); extruded, machinedof automobiles, commercial transportation vehicles, and forged aircraft parts (titaniumconstruction and aluminum); and forged aluminum commercial vehicle wheels, all of whichindustrial equipment. Fastening Systems are sold directly to customers and through distributors. Approximately 70%of the third-party sales in this segment are from the aerospace end market. A small part of this segment also produces various forged and machined metal products (titanium and aluminum) for various end markets. Seasonal decreases in sales are experienced for certain products in the third quarter of the year due to the European summer slowdown. Generally, the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations, which are mostly the U.S. dollar, British pound, and euro.
Third-party sales for the euro.
On December 1, 2019, Arconic completed the divestiture of its forgings businessFastening Systems segment increased $73, or 7%, in 2022 compared with 2021, primarily due to higher volumes in the United Kingdom.commercial aerospace market, with narrow body recovery more than offsetting Boeing 787 production declines, higher volumes in the commercial transportation market, and an increase in material cost pass through, partially offset by lower volumes in the industrial market.
Third-party sales for the Fastening Systems segment decreased $201, or 16%, in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to lower volumes in the commercial aerospace market, driven by the impact of COVID-19 and Boeing 787 production declines, partially offset by higher volumes in the commercial transportation and industrial markets.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the Fastening Systems segment decreased $5, or 2%, in 2022 compared with 2021, primarily due to Boeing 787 production declines, lower volumes in the industrial market, and inflationary costs, partially offset by higher volumes in the narrow body commercial aerospace and commercial transportation markets. The forgings businesssegment added approximately 400 net headcount since the end of 2021 in anticipation of revenue increases into 2023.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the Fastening Systems segment decreased $56, or 19%, in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to lower volumes in the commercial aerospace market, driven by the impact of COVID-19 and Boeing 787 production declines, partially offset by cost reductions and higher volumes in the commercial transportation and industrial markets.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the Fastening Systems segment decreased approximately 200 basis points in 2022 compared with 2021, primarily due to Boeing 787 production declines, lower volumes in the industrial market, and inflationary costs, partially offset by favorable volumes in the narrow body commercial aerospace and commercial transportation markets.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the Fastening Systems segment decreased approximately 80 basis points in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to lower volumes in the commercial aerospace market, driven by the impact of COVID-19 and Boeing 787 production declines, partially offset by cost reductions and higher volumes in the commercial transportation and industrial markets.
In 2023, as compared to 2022, demand in the commercial aerospace and industrial markets is expected to increase. Additionally, an increase in other inflationary costs is expected to contribute to an increase in sales as the Company generally passes through these costs.
24


Engineered Structures
202220212020
Third-party sales$790 $725 $927 
Segment Adjusted EBITDA111 103 125 
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin14.1 %14.2 %13.5 %
Engineered Structures produces steel, titanium ingots and nickel based forged componentsmill products for aerospace mining, and off-highway markets. This business generated third-partydefense applications and is vertically integrated to produce titanium forgings, extrusions forming and machining services for airframe, wing, aero-engine, and landing gear components. Engineered Structures also produces aluminum forgings, nickel forgings, and aluminum machined components, and assemblies for aerospace and defense applications. The segment’s products are sold directly to customers and through distributors, and sales and costs and expenses of $116, $131, and $127this segment are generally transacted in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, and had 540 employees at the timelocal currency of the divestiture.
On December 31, 2018, as part ofrespective operations, which are mostly the Company’s then ongoing strategyU.S. dollar and portfolio review, Arconic completed the sale of its forgings business in Hungary that manufactured high volume steel forgings for drivetrain components in the European heavy-duty truck and automotive market. This business generated third-party sales of $32 and $38 in 2018 and 2017, respectively, and had 180 employees at the time of the divestiture.British pound.
Third-party sales for the Engineered Products and ForgingsStructures segment increased $307,$65, or 5%9%, in 20192022 compared with 2018,2021, primarily due to higher volumes in the narrow body commercial aerospace market as a result of higher aerospace and commercial transportation volumeswell as an increase in material cost pass through and favorable product pricing, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency movements and lower sales of $47 from divestitures of forgings businessesvolumes in the United Kingdom (divested in December 2019)defense aerospace market, including lower F-35 program volumes, and Hungary (divested in December 2018).

Boeing 787 production declines.
Third-party sales for this the Engineered Structures segment decreased $202, or 22%, in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to lower volumes in the commercial aerospace market, driven by the impact of COVID-19 and Boeing 787 production declines, and lower volumes in the defense aerospace market, including lower F-35 program volumes.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the Engineered Structuressegment increased $498,$8, or 8%, in 20182022 compared with 2017,2021, primarily attributabledue to higher volumes in the narrow body commercial aerospace engines, defense, and commercial transportation end marketsmarket and favorable foreign currency movements,product pricing, partially offset by a decline inlower volumes in the industrial gas turbinedefense aerospace market, including lower F-35 program volumes, and lower aerospace pricing principally in the fasteners business.Boeing 787 production declines as well as inflationary costs.
Segment operating profitAdjusted EBITDA for the Engineered Products and Forgings Structuressegment increased $285,decreased $22, or 26%18%, in 20192021 compared with 2018,2020, primarily due to net cost savings, higherlower volumes as noted previously, favorable product pricing,in the commercial aerospace market, driven by the impact of COVID-19 and Boeing 787 production declines, and lower raw material costs,volumes in the defense aerospace market, including lower F-35 program volumes, partially offset by cost reductions.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the unfavorableEngineered Structuressegment decreased approximately 10 basis points in 2022 compared with 2021, primarily due to lower volumes in the defense aerospace market and Boeing 787 production declines as well as continued inflationary cost pressures, partially offset by higher volumes in the narrow body commercial aerospace market.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the Engineered Structuressegment increased approximately 70 basis points in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to cost reductions, partially offset by lower volumes in the commercial aerospace market, driven by the impact of new product introductions in aerospace enginesCOVID-19 and unfavorable product mix.
Segment operating profit for this segment decreased $14, or 1%, in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily attributable to performance shortfallsBoeing 787 production declines, and lower volumes in the Disks asset group; manufacturing inefficiencies in the Engineered Structures business, associated with the now resolved forging press outage at the Cleveland facility that impacted the fourth quarter of 2018 with higher costs of $10; unfavorabledefense aerospace engine mix and new product introductions; andmarket, including lower aerospace pricing principally in the fasteners business; partly offset by the strength in aerospace engine, defense, and commercial transportation volumes and net cost savings.F-35 program volumes.
In 20202023, as compared to 2019,2022, demand in the commercial aerospace end market, excluding the impact of Boeing 737 MAX, is expected to remain strong, driven by the ramp-up of new aerospace engine platforms. Demand in the defense end market is expected to continue to grow due to the ramp-up of certain aerospace programs, while the commercial transportation end marketincrease. Additionally, an increase in material and other inflationary costs is expected to be down. Net cost savings and favorable pricing are expectedcontribute to continue.
In mid-February 2020, a fire occurred at the Company’s forged wheels plant locatedan increase in Barberton, Ohio. While some equipment has safely been returned to service at reduced production levels, the extent of the damage and the financial impact are not yet knownsales as the investigation into the cause of the fireCompany generally passes through these costs.
Forged Wheels
202220212020
Third-party sales$1,058 $921 $679 
Segment Adjusted EBITDA278 294 192 
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin26.3 %31.9 %28.3 %
Forged Wheels produces forged aluminum wheels and its full impact continues. The Company has insurance with a deductible of $10.
Global Rolled Products
 2019 2018 2017
Third-party sales$7,082
 $7,223
 $6,540
Intersegment sales183
 205
 183
Total sales$7,265
 $7,428
 $6,723
Segment operating profit$625
 $481
 $570
Third-party aluminum shipments (kmt)1,379
 1,301
 1,249
The Global Rolled Products segment produces aluminum sheetrelated products for heavy-duty trucks, trailers, and plate, aluminum extruded and machined parts, integrated aluminum structural systems, and architectural extrusions used in the automotive, aerospace, building and construction, industrial, packaging, and commercial transportation end markets. Productsbuses globally. Forged Wheels' products are sold directly to customersOEMs and through distributors. While the customer base for flat-rolled products is large, a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers. Generally, the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations, which are mostly the U.S. dollar Chinese yuan, the euro, the Russian ruble, the Brazilian real, and the British pound.
In March 2017, Arconic completed the sale of its Fusina, Italy rolling mill. The rolling mill generated third-party sales of $54 in 2017 and had approximately 312 employees.euro.
Third-party sales for the Global Rolled Products Forged Wheels segment increased $137, or 15%, in 2022 compared with 2021, primarily due to an increase in aluminum material and other inflationary cost pass through and higher commercial transportation volumes, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency movements.
Third-party sales for the Forged Wheels segment increased $242, or 36%, in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to higher commercial transportation volumes and an increase in aluminum material cost pass through.
25


Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the Forged Wheelssegment decreased $141,$16, or 2%5%, in 20192022 compared with 2018,2021, primarily as a result of lower aluminum prices, the absence of sales of $144 from the completed ramp down of Arconic's North American packaging operations (completed in December 2018), anddue to unfavorable foreign currency movements, partially offset by favorable product pricing and mix and higher volumes incommercial transportation volumes.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the packaging, aerospace, and industrial end markets.
Third-party sales for this Forged Wheelssegment increased $683,$102, or 10%53%, in 20182021 compared with 2017,2020, primarily attributabledue to higher aluminum prices; higher volumes in the automotive, commercial transportation volumes, fixed cost reductions, and industrial end markets; and favorable product mix; partially offset by the absence of sales of $54 from the rolling millmaximizing production in Fusina, Italy and the planned ramp down of Arconic's North American packaging operations.low-cost countries.
Segment operating profitAdjusted EBITDA Margin for the Global Rolled Products Forged Wheelssegment increased $144, or 30%,decreased approximately 560 basis points in 20192022 compared with 2018,2021, primarily due to favorable pricing adjustments on industrialaluminum material and commercial transportation products; favorable aluminum price impacts; netEuropean energy cost savings; favorable product mix; and the impact of a charge incurred in 2018 related to a physical inventory adjustment at one plant that did not recur in 2019; partially offset by operational challenges at one aluminum extrusions plant and the impact of the Tennessee plant transition to industrial production.

Segment operating profit for this segment decreased $89, or 16%, in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily driven by operational challenges at one plant, higher aluminum prices,pass through as well as unfavorable aerospace wide-body production mix, higher transportation costs and scrap spreads, and a physical inventory adjustment of $23;foreign currency movements, partially offset by higher automotive,volumes.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the Forged Wheelssegment increased approximately 360 basis points in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to higher commercial transportation volumes, fixed cost reductions, and industrial volumes.maximizing production in low-cost countries, partially offset by aluminum material cost pass through.
On February 1, 2020, Arconic sold itsIn July 2022, the Company’s cast house in Barberton, Ohio, which produces aluminum rolling millingot used in Itapissuma, Brazil. This rolling mill generated salesthe production of $143wheels for the North American commercial transportation market, experienced a mechanical failure resulting in 2019substantial heat and had 513 employeesfire-related damage to equipment. The downtime temporarily reduced production levels and affected productivity at the timeplant. The plant has been repaired and resumed normal operations in the fourth quarter of divestiture.2022. The Company has insurance with a deductible of $10.
In mid-February 2020, a fire occurred at the Company’s forged wheels plant located in Barberton, Ohio. The downtime reduced production levels and affected productivity at the plant. During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company settled the insurance claim related to the Barberton Plant Fire.
In 2023, as compared to 2019,2022, demand from the automotive end market is expected to be up, while headwinds will continue in the commercial transportation end market. The aerospace airframe end market will be heavily influencedmarkets served by the 737 MAX situation. GrowthForged Wheels is expected withto decrease in most regions due to lower OEM builds. A decrease in material costs partially offset by an increase in other inflationary costs is expected to contribute to a net decrease in sales as the Tennessee industrial products ramp-up. The BCS business expects continued growth and margin expansion. Net productivity improvements areCompany generally passes through these costs. Sales in the Forged Wheels segment could also anticipated to continue.be negatively impacted by component supply chain constraints at our customers.
Reconciliation of Total segment operating profitSegment Adjusted EBITDA to Consolidated incomeIncome from continuing operations before income taxes
202220212020
Income from continuing operations before income taxes$606 $324 $171 
Loss on debt redemption146 64 
Interest expense, net229 259 317 
Other expense, net(1)
82 19 74 
Operating income$919 $748 $626 
Segment provision for depreciation and amortization258 261 262 
Unallocated amounts:
Restructuring and other charges56 90 182 
Corporate expense119 101 82 
Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA$1,352 $1,200 $1,152 
(1)See the Contingencies section of Note V to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 2019 2018 2017
Total segment operating profit$2,015
 $1,586
 $1,689
Unallocated amounts:     
Impairment of goodwill
 
 (719)
Restructuring and other charges(620) (9) (165)
Corporate expense(360) (252) (325)
Consolidated operating income$1,035
 $1,325
 $480
Interest expense(338) (378) (496)
Other (expense) income, net(122) (79) 486
Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes$575
 $868
 $470
Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes that this measure is meaningful to investors because it provides additional information with respect to the Company’s operating performance and the Company’s ability to meet its financial obligations. Differences between the total segment and consolidated totals are in Corporate.
See Impairment of Goodwill, Restructuring and Other Charges,other charges, D&A, Loss on debt redemption, Interest Expense,expense, net, and Other Expense (Income), Net,expense, net discussions above under Results“Results of OperationsOperations” for reference.
Corporate expense increased $108,$18, or 43%18%, in 20192022 compared with 20182021, primarily due to higher net costs related to the France Plant Fire, the Barberton Plant Fire, and the Barberton Cast House Incident of $39, higher employment, travel, and lease costs in 2022, and higher nonrecurring legal and other advisory reimbursements received in 2021 compared to 2022 of $1, partially offset by 2021 costs of $32 associated with closures, shutdowns, and other items which did not recur in 2022.
Corporate expense increased $19, or 23%, in 2021 compared with 2020, primarily due to costs associated with the planned Separationclosures, shutdowns, and other items of Arconic of $78; higher annual incentive compensation accruals$32 and executive compensation costs; environmental remediation costs for Grasse River of $25; impairment of energy business assets of $10; net impacts associated with a fire at a fasteners plant of $9 (net of insurance reimbursements);nonrecurring legal and collective bargaining agreement negotiation costs of $9; partially offset by costs incurredother advisory reimbursements received in 20182020 that did not recur in 2019 related2021 aggregating to settlements of certain customer claims of $38;$8, partially offset by lower costs driven by overhead cost reductions; lower research and development expenses;reductions, as well as costs incurred in 2020 associated with the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction of $7 that did not recur in 2021 and lower net legal and other advisory costs related to Grenfell Tower of $10 primarily due to insurance reimbursements.
Corporate expense decreased $73, or 22%, in 2018 compared with 2017 primarily due to proxy, advisory and governance-related costs of $58 and costs related to the SeparationBarberton Plant Fire and the France Plant Fire of Alcoa Inc.$6.
26


Environmental Matters
See the Environmental Matters section of Note VT to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
ArconicHowmet maintains a disciplined approach to cash management and the strengthening of its balance sheet. Management continued to focus on actions to improve Arconic’sHowmet’s cost structure and liquidity, providing the Company with the ability to operate effectively. Such actions included procurement efficiencies and overhead rationalization to reduce costs, working capital initiatives, and maintaining a sustainable level of capital expenditures.
Cash provided from operations and financing activities is expected to be adequate to cover Arconic’sHowmet's operational and business needs over the next 12 months. For an analysis of long-term liquidity, see Contractual Obligations“Contractual Obligations” and Off-Balance“Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsArrangements” below.

At December 31, 2019,2022, cash and cash equivalents of ArconicHowmet were $1,648,$791, of which $414$283 was held by Arconic'sHowmet's non-U.S. subsidiaries. If the cash held by non-U.S. subsidiaries were to be repatriated to the U.S., the companyCompany does not expect there to be additional material income tax consequences.
The cash flows related to Arconic Corporation have not been segregated and are included in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows for the period prior to the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction.
Operating Activities
Cash provided from operations in 20192022 was $406$733 compared with $217$449 in 2018. 2021 and $9 in 2020.
The increase in cash provided from operations of $189,$284, or 87%63%, between 2022 and 2021 was primarily due to lower working capital of $165, higher operating results of $89, and lower pension contributions of $30,$53, partially offset by higher working capitalpayments on noncurrent liabilities of $112.$37. The components of the change in working capital included unfavorablefavorable changes in receivables of $176, including collections of employee retention credit receivables, accrued expenses of $169, accounts payable of $395$102, and taxes, including income taxes, of $106,$29, partially offset by favorable changesinventories of $294 and prepaid expenses and other current assets of $17.
The increase in receivables of $165 and accrued expenses of $148.
Cashcash provided from operations in 2018 was $217 compared with Cash used for operations $39 in 2017. The increase of $256$440 between 2021 and 2020 was primarily due to lower working capital of $209$357, lower pension contributions of $161, and a favorable change inlower noncurrent liabilities of $169 due primarily to reversals in 2017 related to the Firth Rixson earn-out liability of $81 and separation-related guarantee liability of $25,$12, partially offset by lower operating results.results of $38 and the write-off of an indemnification receivable of $53 related to a Spanish tax reserve that occurred in 2020 and did not occur in 2021. The components of the change in working capital included favorable changes in accounts payable of $277, taxes, including income taxes of $127, and inventories of $118, partially offset by unfavorable changes in receivables of $227,$525, accrued expenses of $74,$71, and prepaid expenses and other current assets of $12.$13, partially offset by taxes, including income taxes of $139, receivables of $99, including employee retention credit receivables, and inventories of $14.
Financing Activities
Cash used for financing activities was $1,568$526 in 20192022 compared with $649$1,444 in 20182021 and $1,015$369 in 2017.2020.
The use of cash in 20192022 was primarily related to the repurchase of $1,150common stock of $400, the repayments on the aggregate outstanding principal amount of long-term debt of approximately $69, and dividends paid to shareholders of $44. These items were partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options of $16. On an annual basis, the partial repayment of the 5.125% Notes due October 2024 (the “5.125% Notes”) in 2022 will decrease Interest expense, net by approximately $4.
The use of cash in 2021 was primarily related to the repayments on the aggregate outstanding principal amount of long-term debt of approximately $1,537, repurchase of common stock (see Note Hof $430, premiums paid on the redemption of debt of $138, dividends paid to shareholders of $19, and debt issuance costs of $11. These items were partially offset by long-term debt issuance of $700 and proceeds from the Consolidated Financial Statementsexercise of employee stock options of $22.
The use of cash in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data);2020 was primarily related to the repayments on borrowings under certain revolving credit facilities (see below) and repayments on debt, primarily the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 1.63% Convertible6.150% Notes of approximately $403 (see Note P$2,040, cash distributed to Arconic Corporation at the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data);Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction of $500, repurchase of common stock of $73, debt issuance costs of $61, premiums paid on the redemption of debt of $59, and dividends paid to shareholders of $57.$11. These items were partially offset by additions tolong-term debt for borrowings under certain revolving credit facilitiesissuance of $400$2,400 (of which $1,200 went with Arconic Corporation at the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction) and proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options of $56.$33.
The Company has an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3, filed with the SEC, which allows for offerings of debt securities from time to time. The Company may opportunistically issue new debt securities under such registration statement or otherwise in accordance with securities laws, including but not limited to in order to refinance existing indebtedness.
The use of cash in 2018 was principallyFor further details regarding the result of $1,103 in repayments on borrowings under certain revolving credit facilities (see below)Company’s debt and repayments on debt, primarily related to the early redemption of the then remaining outstanding 5.72% Notes due in 2019 (see stock repurchases, see Note RP and Note J, respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K) and $119 in dividends to shareholders. These items were partially offset by $600 in additions to debt, primarily from borrowings under certain revolving credit facilities.10-K.
27


The use of cash in 2017 was principally the result of $1,634 in repayments on borrowings under certain revolvingCompany maintains a credit facilities (see below) and repayments on debt, primarily relatedfacility pursuant to the early redemption of the Company’s 6.50% Bonds due 2018, 6.75% Notes due 2018, and a portion of the 5.72% Notes due 2019 (see Note P to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K); $162 in dividends to shareholders; and $52 in premiums paid on early redemption of debt. These items were partially offset by $816 in additions to debt, primarily from borrowings under certain revolving credit facilities, and $50 of proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
In September 2014, Arconic completed two public securities offerings under its shelf registration statement for (i) $1,250 of 25 million depositary shares, each representing a 1/10th interest in a share of Arconic’s 5.375% Class B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series 1, par value $1 per share, liquidation preference $500 per share, and (ii) $1,250 of 5.125% Notes due 2024. The net proceeds of the offerings were used to finance the cash portion of the acquisition of Firth Rixson. On October 2, 2017, all outstanding 24,975,978 depositary shares were converted at a rate of 1.56996 into 39,211,286 common shares; 24,022 depositary shares were previously tendered for early conversion into 31,420 shares of Arconic common stock. No gain or loss was recognized associated with this noncash equity transaction.
Arconic maintains a Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders and issuers named therein that expirestherein. Following the end of the covenant relief period on June 29, 2023December 31, 2022, the restriction on common stock dividends and provides for a senior unsecured revolving credit facility of $3,000. In addition toshare repurchases under the Credit Agreement, Arconic has a number of other credit agreements that provide a combined borrowing capacity of $640 as of December 31, 2019.along with certain covenants, no longer applies. See Note RP to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K.
Arconic’sThe Company may in the future repurchase additional portions of its debt or equity securities from time to time, in either the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, in accordance with applicable SEC and other legal requirements. The timing, prices, and sizes of purchases depend upon prevailing trading prices, general economic and market conditions, and other factors, including applicable securities laws. Such purchases may be completed by means of trading plans established from time to time in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, block trades, private transactions, open market repurchases, tender offers, and/or accelerated share repurchase agreements or other derivative transactions.
The Company’s costs of borrowing and ability to access the capital markets are affected not only by market conditions but also by the short-short-term and long-term debt ratings assigned to Arconicthe Company by the major credit rating agencies.
The Company's credit ratings from the three major credit rating agencies are as follows: 
Issuer RatingOutlookDate of Last Update
S&P Ratings ServiceBB+StableNovember 29, 2022
Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”)Ba1StableApril 27, 2022
Fitch Investors Service (“Fitch”)BBB-StableMarch 22, 2022
On May 1, 2017, Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P)November 29, 2022, S&P affirmed Arconic’sthe following ratings for Howmet: long-term debt at BBB-, an investment grade rating, with a stableBB+ and the current outlook and its short-term debt at A-3. as stable.
On February 7, 2019, S&P placed the rating on negative credit watch and, subsequently, on April 26, S&P affirmed the27, 2022, Moody’s upgraded Howmet’s long-term debt rating from Ba2 to Ba1 citing the Company’s ability to improve its financial leverage, strong cash generation, and well-balanced financial policies and affirmed the current outlook as stable.
On March 22, 2022, Fitch affirmed the following ratings for Howmet: long-term debt at BBB- but changedand the current outlook to negative. On January 28, 2020, S&P affirmed the long-term debt rating at BBB- but changed the outlook to stable in expectation of the separation impact. On November 1, 2016, Moody’s Investor Service (Moody’s) downgraded Arconic’s long-term debt rating

from Ba1, a non-investment grade, to Ba2 with a stable outlook and its short-term debt rating from Speculative Grade Liquidity-1 to Speculative Grade Liquidity-2. Moody’s ratings and outlooks were affirmed on November 2, 2017, October 8, 2018, and October 9, 2019. On January 24, 2020, Moody’s affirmed the long-term debt rating at Ba2 but changed the outlook to negative. On April 21, 2016, Fitch affirmed Arconic’s long-term debt rating at BB+, a non-investment grade, and short-term debt at B. Additionally, Fitch changed the outlook from positive to evolving. On July 7, 2016, Fitch changed the outlook from evolving to stable (ratings and outlook were affirmed on July 3, 2017). On September 27, 2018, Fitch changed the outlook from stable to positive (ratings and outlook were affirmed on October 8, 2019).as stable.
Investing Activities
Cash used for investing activities was $135 in 2022 compared with cash provided from investing activities of $107 in 2021 and $271 in 2020.
The use of cash in 2022 was $583capital expenditures of $193 primarily related to various automation projects, information technology upgrades, and sustaining capital projects across all segments, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of assets of $58, which was primarily due to the sale of the corporate center and a manufacturing facility in 2019 comparedEngine Products. In the second quarter of 2022, the Company sold the corporate headquarters in Pittsburgh, PA. The proceeds from the sale of the corporate headquarters were $44, excluding $3 of transaction costs, and a carrying value of $41. The Company entered into a 12-year lease with $565the purchaser for a portion of the property. Additionally, in 2018the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company sold the property of an Engine Products segment’s manufacturing facility. The proceeds from the sale of this property were $15 and $1,320a carrying value of $7.
The source of cash in 2017.2021 was primarily cash receipts from sold receivables of $267 and proceeds from the sale of a small manufacturing plant in France of $8 and the sale of assets at a small U.S. manufacturing facility in Fastening Systems of $23, partially offset by capital expenditures of $199 primarily related to capacity expansion investments in Hungary and Mexico in Forged Wheels and various automation projects. As a result of accounts receivables securitization program changes in 2021, there was no additional activity related to cash receipts from sold receivables within investing activities in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows in future periods. The net cash funding from the sale of accounts receivable was neither a use of cash nor a source of cash during 2022.
The source of cash in 20192020 was primarily due to cash receipts from sold receivables of $995,$422 and proceeds from the sale of assetsa rolling mill business in Itapissuma, Brazil of $50 and businessesa hard alloy extrusions plant in South Korea of $103$62, both of which were related to Arconic Corporation (see Note CS to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data), and the sale of fixed income securities of $73, partially offset by capital expenditures of $586, including expansion of a wheels plant in Hungary, expansion of aerospace airfoils capacity in the United States, and transition of the Tennessee plant to industrial production.8
The source of cash in 2018 included cash receipts from sold receivables of $1,016 and proceeds from the sale of the Texarkana, Texas rolling mill and cast house of $302, partially offset by capital expenditures of $768, including the horizontal heat treat furnace at the Davenport, Iowa plant and an expansion of a wheels plant in Szekesfehervar, Hungary.
The source of cash in 2017 included proceeds of $888 from the sale of a portion of Arconic’s investment in Alcoa Corporation common stock, cash receipts from sold receivables of $792, and the receipt of proceeds from the sale of the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project of $243 (see Note U to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K), somewhatpartially offset by cash used for capital expenditures of $596, including the aerospace expansion (very thick plate stretcher and horizontal heat treat furnace) at the Davenport, Iowa plant and a titanium aluminide furnace at the Niles, Ohio facility, and the injection$267.
28


In the second quarter of 2017, the Company completed a Debt-for-Equity Exchange with the Investment Banks for the remaining portion of Arconic’s retained interest in Alcoa Corporation common stock for a portion of the Company’s outstanding notes held by the Investment Banks for $465 including accrued and unpaid interest. See Note P to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Contractual Obligations. ArconicObligations
Howmet is required to make future payments under various contracts, including long-term purchase obligations, financing arrangements, and lease agreements. ArconicHowmet also has commitments to fund its pension plans, provide payments for other postretirement benefit plans, and fund capital projects. As
In order to better understand Howmet’s outstanding contractual obligations, the table below represents a summary of these commitments as of December 31, 2019, a summary of Arconic’s outstanding contractual obligations is as follows2022 (these contractual obligations are grouped in the same manner as they are classified in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows in order to provide a better understanding of the nature of the obligations and to provide a basis for comparison to historical information):
Total 2020 2021-2022 2023-2024 ThereafterTotal20232024-20252026-2027Thereafter
Operating activities:         Operating activities:
Energy-related purchase obligations$57
 $29
 $25
 $3
 $
Raw material purchase obligations569
 495
 64
 8
 2
Raw material purchase obligations$413 $257 $154 $$— 
Other purchase obligations134
 80
 49
 5
 
Other purchase obligations— — — 
Operating leases317
 81
 108
 58
 70
Operating leases134 39 47 24 24 
Interest related to total debt1,975
 344
 444
 344
 843
Interest related to total debt1,413 227 376 238 572 
Estimated minimum required pension funding1,705
 475
 655
 575
 
Estimated minimum required pension funding325 45 132 148 — 
Other postretirement benefit payments655
 80
 160
 155
 260
Other postretirement benefit payments102 11 22 21 48 
Layoff and other restructuring payments34
 34
 
 
 
Layoff and other restructuring payments— — 
Deferred revenue arrangements36
 6
 30
 
 
Uncertain tax positions220
 
 
 
 220
Uncertain tax positions— — — 
Financing activities:         Financing activities:
Total debt5,940
 1,028
 1,871
 1,246
 1,795
Total debt4,181 — 1,681 625 1,875 
Dividends to shareholders
 
 
 
 
Investing activities:         Investing activities:
Capital projects401
 247
 121
 33
 
Capital projects156 125 31 — — 
Totals$12,043
 $2,899
 $3,527
 $2,427
 $3,190
Totals$6,741 $714 $2,449 $1,058 $2,520 
Obligations for Operating Activities
Energy-related purchase obligations consist primarily of electricity and natural gas contracts with expiration dates ranging from one year to five years. Raw material purchase obligations consist mostly of aluminum, titanium, sponge,cobalt, nickel, and various other metals with expiration dates ranging from less than one year to sixfive years. Many of these purchase obligations contain variable pricing components, and, as a result, actual cash payments may differ from the estimates provided in the preceding table. The Company generally passes through metal costs in customer contracts with limited exceptions. As a result, the Company expects higher metal costs to contribute to increased sales in 2023. In connection with the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction, the Company entered into several agreements with Arconic Corporation that govern the relationship between the Company and Arconic Corporation following the separation, including raw material supply agreements.
Operating leases represent multi-year obligations for certain land and buildings, plant equipment, vehicles, and computer equipment.
Interest related to total debt is based on interest rates in effect as of December 31, 20192022 and is calculated on debt with maturities that extend to 2042.
Estimated minimum required pension funding and other postretirement benefit payments are based on actuarial estimates using current assumptions for discount rates, long-term rate of return on plan assets, and health care cost trend rates, among others. It is Arconic’sHowmet’s policy to fund amounts for pension plans sufficient to meet the minimum requirements set forth in applicable countrythe benefits laws and tax laws.laws of the applicable country. Periodically, ArconicHowmet contributes additional amounts as deemed appropriate. The estimates reported in the preceding table include amounts sufficient to meet the minimum required, along with approximately $60 of contributions in 2020 related to actions designed to reduce future obligations. ArconicHowmet has determined that it is not practicable to present pension funding and other postretirement benefit payments beyond 20242027 and 2029,2032, respectively.
Layoff and other restructuring payments to be paid within one year primarily relate to severance costs, special layoff benefit payments, and lease termination costs.
Deferred revenue arrangements require Arconic to deliver product to certain customers over the specified contract period (through 2020 for a sheet and plate contract and 2021 for certain aerospace parts contracts). While these obligations are not expected to result in cash payments, they represent contractual obligations for which the Company would be obligated if the specified product deliveries could not be made.

Uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on an income tax return may result in additional payments to tax authorities. The amount in the preceding table includes interest and penalties accrued related to such positions as of December 31, 2019.2022. The total amount of uncertain tax positions is included in the “Thereafter” column as the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of potential future payments. If a tax authority agrees with the tax position taken or expected to be taken or the applicable statute of limitations expires, then additional payments will not be necessary. Tax assessments received may also result in payments to be made in order to preserve our right to appeal any tax positions challenged by tax authorities for which we have concluded that we are more likely than not to prevail.
29


Contingencies such as legal proceedings and environmental matters may also result in additional cash payments. The timing of these payments, if necessary, depends on several factors, including the timing of litigation and settlements of liability claims. Accordingly, amounts have not been included in the preceding table. See Note V to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K for further discussion.
Obligations for Financing Activities
ArconicHowmet has historically paid quarterly dividends on its preferred and common stock. Including dividends onThe Company paid an aggregate of $44 in common stock and preferred stock Arconic paid $57 in dividends to shareholders during 2019.2022. Because all dividends are subject to approval by Arconic’sHowmet’s Board of Directors, amounts are not included in the preceding table unless such authorization has occurred. As of December 31, 2019,2022, there were 432,855,183412,155,057 shares of outstanding common stock and 546,024 shares of outstanding Class A preferred stock. In 2019,2022, the preferred stock dividend was $3.75 per share. A dividend of $0.10 per share andon the Company’s common stock dividend was $0.12paid in 2022 ($0.02 per share.share in each of the first, second, and third quarters of 2022 and $0.04 in the fourth quarter of 2022). Fully diluted shares outstanding as of December 31, 2022 were 418,011,145.
The Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $1,500 of the Company's outstanding common stock. After giving effect to the share repurchases made through the fourth quarter of 2022, approximately $947 Board authorization remained available as of January 1, 2023. There is no stated expiration for the Share Repurchase Programs. Accordingly, amounts have not been included in the preceding table. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for additional information.
Obligations for Investing Activities
Capital projects in the preceding table only include amounts approved by management as of December 31, 2019.2022. Funding levels may vary in future years based on anticipated construction schedules of the projects. It is expected that significant expansion projects will be funded through various sources, including cash provided from operations. Total capital expenditures are anticipated to be less than four percentapproximately 4% of sales in 2020.2023.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2019, Arconic2022, the Company had outstanding bank guarantees related to tax matters, outstanding debt, workers’ compensation, environmental obligations, energy contracts, and customs duties, among others. The total amount committed under these guarantees, which expire at various dates between 20202023 and 2040, was $31$13 at December 31, 2019.2022.
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, between ArconicHowmet and Alcoa Corporation, ArconicHowmet was required to provide certain guarantees for Alcoa Corporation, which had a combined fair value of $9 and $6 at both December 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively,2021, and were included in Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits onin the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining guarantee, for which the Company and Arconic was required to provide guarantees related to two long-term supply agreements for energy for Alcoa Corporation facilities in the event of an Alcoa Corporation payment default. In October 2017, Alcoa Corporation announced that it had terminated one of the two agreements, the electricity contract with Luminant Generation Company LLC that was tied to its Rockdale Operations, effective as of October 1, 2017. As a result of the termination of the Rockdale electricity contract, Arconic recorded income of $25 in the fourth quarter of 2017 associated with reversing the fair value of the electricity contract guarantee. For the remaining long-term supply agreement, Arconic is required to provide a guarantee up to an estimated present value amount of approximately $1,353 and $1,087 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, in the event of an Alcoa Corporation payment default. This guarantee expires in 2047. For this guarantee, subject to its provisions, Arconic isare secondarily liable in the event of a payment default by Alcoa Corporation. ArconicCorporation, relates to a long-term energy supply agreement that expires in 2047 at an Alcoa Corporation facility. The Company currently views the risk of an Alcoa Corporation payment default on its obligations under the contract to be remote. The Company and Arconic Corporation are required to provide a guarantee up to an estimated present value amount of approximately $1,040 and $1,406 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, in the event of an Alcoa Corporation payment default. In December 2019, Arconic entered into2020, December 2021, and December 2022, a one-year insurance policysurety bond with a limit of $80 relating to the remaining long-term energy supply agreement. The premiumthis guarantee was obtained by Alcoa Corporation to protect Howmet's obligation. This surety bond is expected to be paid by Alcoa Corporation. The decision to enter into a claims purchase agreement or insurance policy will be maderenewed on an annual basis going forward.by Alcoa Corporation.
ArconicHowmet has outstanding letters of credit primarily related to workers’ compensation, environmental obligations, and leasinginsurance obligations. The total amount committed under these letters of credit, which automatically renew or expire at various dates, mostly in 2020,2023, was $142$120 at December 31, 2019.2022.
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement,Agreements between the Company and Arconic wasCorporation and between the Company and Alcoa Corporation, the Company is required to retain letters of credit of $52 $53 (which are included in the $120 in the above paragraph) that had previously been provided related to boththe Company, Arconic Corporation, and Alcoa Corporation workers’ compensation claims whichthat occurred prior to the respective separation transactions of April 1, 2020 and November 1, 2016. Arconic Corporation and Alcoa Corporation workers’ compensation claims and letter of credit fees paid by Arconicthe Company are being proportionally billed to, and are being fully reimbursed by, Arconic Corporation and Alcoa Corporation.Corporation, respectively. Also, the Company was required to provide letters of credit for certain Arconic Corporation environmental obligations and, as a result, the Company has $17 of outstanding letters of credit relating to such liabilities (which are included in the $120 in the above paragraph). Arconic Corporation has issued surety bonds to cover these environmental obligations. Arconic Corporation is being billed for these letter of credit fees paid by the Company and will reimburse the Company for any payments made under these letters of credit.
Arconic
30


Howmet has outstanding surety bonds primarily related to tax matters, contract performance, workers’ compensation, environmental-related matters, energy contracts, and customs duties. The total amount committed under these annual surety bonds, which expire and automatically renew at various dates, primarily in 2020,2023 and 2024, was $50$43 at December 31, 2019.2022.
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement,Agreements between the Company and Arconic wasCorporation and between the Company and Alcoa Corporation, the Company is required to provide surety bonds of $22 (which are included in the $43 in the above paragraph) that had previously been provided related to the Company, Arconic Corporation and Alcoa Corporation workers’ compensation claims whichpaid that occurred prior to the respective separation transactions of April 1, 2020 and November 1, 20162016. Arconic Corporation and as a result, Arconic has $24 in outstanding surety bonds relating to these liabilities. Alcoa Corporation workers’ compensation claims and surety bond fees paid by Arconicthe Company are being proportionally billed to, and are being fully reimbursed by, Arconic Corporation and Alcoa Corporation.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain judgments, estimates, and assumptions regarding uncertainties that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosed in the accompanying Notes. These estimates are based on historical experience and, in some cases, assumptions based on current and future market experience, including considerations relating to the impact of COVID-19 and changes in the aerospace industry as a result of the pandemic. The impact of these changes is rapidly changing and of unknown duration and macroeconomic impact and, as a result, these conditions remain highly uncertain. Areas that require significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions include accounting for environmental and litigation matters; the testing of goodwill, other intangible assets, and properties, plants, and equipment, and other intangible assets for impairment; estimating fair value of businesses acquired or divested; pension plans and other postretirement benefits obligations; stock-based compensation; and income taxes.
Management uses historical experience and all available information to make these judgments, estimates, and assumptions, and actual results may differ from those used to prepare the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements at any given time. Despite these inherent limitations, management believes that Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes provide a meaningful and fair perspective of the Company.
A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Note AA to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements of this Form 10-K. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables the Company to provide the users of the Consolidated Financial Statements with useful and reliable information about the Company’s operating results and financial condition.
Environmental Matters.Goodwill. Expenditures for current operations are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Expenditures relating to existing conditions caused by past operations, which will not contribute to future sales, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when remediation costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The liability may include costs such as site investigations, consultant fees, feasibility studies, outside contractors, and monitoring expenses. Estimates are generally not discounted or reduced by potential claims for recovery. Claims for recovery are recognized when probable and as agreements are reached with third parties. The estimates also include costs related to other potentially responsible parties to the extent that Arconic has reason to believe such parties will not fully pay their proportionate share. The liability is continuously reviewed and adjusted to reflect current remediation progress, prospective estimates of required activity, and other factors that may be relevant, including changes in technology or regulations.
Litigation Matters. For asserted claims and assessments, liabilities are recorded when an unfavorable outcome of a matter is deemed to be probable and the loss is reasonably estimable. Management determines the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome based on many factors such as the nature of the matter, available defenses and case strategy, progress of the matter, views and opinions of legal counsel and other advisors, applicability and success of appeals processes, and the outcome of similar historical matters, among others. Once an unfavorable outcome is deemed probable, management weighs the probability of estimated losses, and the most reasonable loss estimate is recorded. If an unfavorable outcome of a matter is deemed to be reasonably possible, then the matter is disclosed and no liability is recorded. With respect to unasserted claims or assessments, management must first determine that the probability that an assertion will be made is likely, then, a determination as to the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to reasonably estimate the potential loss is made. Legal matters are reviewed on a continuous basis to determine if there has been a change in management’s judgment regarding the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the estimate of a potential loss.
Goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized; instead, it is reviewedHowmet reviews goodwill for impairment annually (in the fourth quarter) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist or if a decision is made to sell or realign a business. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator ofThe Company has the option to assess impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include deterioration inthrough qualitative assessment, which includes factors such as general economic conditions, negative developments in equity and credit markets, adverse changes in the markets in which an entity operates, increases in input costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows, or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods, among others. TheHowmet can also assess goodwill impairment through a quantitative analysis, using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model to estimate a reporting unit’s fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill.
Goodwill is allocated amongvalue. Assumptions and evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. For 2019, Arconic had seven reporting units, of which four were includedestimates utilized in the EP&F segment (Fastening Systems, Engineered Structures, Engine Products, and Forged Wheels), and three were included in the GRP segment (Global Rolled Products, Aluminum Extrusions, and BCS.)
In reviewing goodwill for impairment, an entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (greater than 50%) that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity elects to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that an impairment is more likely than not, the entity is then required to perform the quantitative impairment test (described below), otherwise no further analysis is required. An entity also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test. The ultimate outcome of the goodwill impairment

review for a reporting unit should be the same whether an entity chooses to perform the qualitative assessment or proceeds directly to the quantitative impairment test.
Arconic determines annually, based on facts and circumstances, which of its reporting units will be subject to the qualitative assessment. For those reporting units where a qualitative assessment is either not performed or for which the conclusion is that an impairment is more likely than not, a quantitative impairment test will be performed. Arconic’s policy is that a quantitative impairment test be performed for each reporting unit at least once during every three-year period.
Under the qualitative assessment, various events and circumstances (or factors) that would affect the estimated fair value of a reporting unit are identified (similar to impairment indicators above). These factors are then classified by the type of impact they would have on the estimated fair value using positive, neutral, and adverse categories based on current business conditions. Additionally, an assessment of the level of impact that a particular factor would have on the estimated fair value is determined using high, medium, and low weighting. Furthermore, management considers the results of the most recent quantitative impairment test completed for a reporting unit and compares theDCF model include weighted average cost of capital (WACC) between the current(“WACC”) rates, revenue, future profitability, working capital, cash flows and prior years for each reporting unit.
During the 2019 annual reviewa number of goodwill, management proceeded directlyother items. For more information on these matters, see Note A to the quantitative impairment test for all sevenConsolidated Financial Statements of its reporting units. The estimated fair values for each of the seven reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by more than 50%, thus, there was no goodwill impairment. Under the quantitative impairment test, the evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Arconic uses a discounted cash flow (DCF) model to estimate the current fair value of its reporting units when testing for impairment, as management believes forecasted cash flows are the best indicator of such fair value. A number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the DCF model to forecast operating cash flows, including sales growth (volumes and pricing), production costs, capital spending, and discount rate. Most of these assumptions vary significantly among the reporting units. Cash flow forecasts are generally based on approved business unit operating plans for the early years and historical relationships in later years. The WACC rate for the individual reporting units is estimated with the assistance of valuation experts. Arconic would recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value without exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
In the first quarter of 2019, management transferred its aluminum extrusions business (Aluminum Extrusions) from Engineered Structures within the EP&F segment to the GRP segment, based on synergies with the GRP segment including similar customer base, technologies, and manufacturing capabilities. Management assessed and concluded that the remaining Engineered Structures business unit and the Aluminum Extrusions business unit represent reporting units. As a result of the reorganization, goodwill of $110 was reallocated from Engineered Structures to Aluminum Extrusions and these reporting units were evaluated for impairment during the first quarter of 2019. The estimated fair value of each of these reporting units substantially exceeded their carrying value; thus, there was no goodwill impairment. In the second quarter of 2019, management transferred its castings operations from Engineered Structures to Engine Products within the EP&F segment based on process expertise for investment castings that existed within Engine Products. As a result, goodwill of $105 was reallocated from Engineered Structures to Engine Products and these reporting units were evaluated for impairment during the second quarter of 2019. The estimated fair value of each of these reporting units substantially exceeded their carrying value; thus, there was no impairment. As a result of the elimination of the TCS segment in the third quarter of 2019 (see Segment Information above), the Company transferred $7 of Forged Wheels goodwill and $68 of BCS goodwill from the TCS segment to the EP&F and GRP segments, respectively. Both Forged Wheels and BCS are considered reporting units.
In the second quarter of 2019, as a result of the decline in the forecasted financial performance and related impairment of long-lived assets of the Disks asset group within Engine Products, the Company also performed an interim impairment evaluation of goodwill for Engine Products. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit was substantially in excess of its carrying value; thus, there was no impairment of goodwill.
In connection with the interim impairment evaluation of long-lived assets for the Disks asset group within Engine Products in the second quarter of 2018, which resulted from a decline in forecasted financial performance for the business in connection with its updated three-year strategic plan, the Company also performed an interim impairment evaluation of goodwill for Engine Products. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit was substantially in excess of the carrying value; thus, there was no impairment of goodwill.
Goodwill impairment tests in 2018 and 2017 indicated that goodwill was not impaired for any of the Company’s reporting units, except for the AFE business (the AFE operations were realigned and transferred to Aluminum Extrusions and Engine Products) whose estimated fair value was lower than its carrying value. As such, Arconic recorded an impairment for the full amount of goodwill in the AFE reporting unit of $719 in 2017. The decrease in fair value of AFE was primarily due to unfavorable performance that was impacting operating margins and a higher discount rate due to an increase in the risk-free rate of return, while the carrying value increased compared to prior year.

this Form 10-K.
Properties, Plants, and Equipment and Other Intangible Assets.Properties, plants, and equipment and Other intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets (asset group) may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is determined by comparing the estimated undiscounted net cash flows of the operations related to the assets (asset group) to their carrying amount. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of the assets (asset group) exceeds the estimated undiscounted net cash flows. The amount of the impairment loss to be recorded is measured as the excess of the carrying value of the assets (asset group) over their fair value, with fair value determined using the best information available, which generally is a DCF model. The determination of what constitutes an asset group, the associated estimated undiscounted net cash flows, and the estimated useful lives of the assets also require significant judgments.
During the second quarter of 2019, the Company updated its five-year strategic plan and determined that there was a decline in the forecasted financial performance for the Disks asset group within the EP&F segment. As such, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the Disks asset group long-lived assets by comparing the carrying value to the undiscounted cash flows of the Disks asset group. The carrying value exceeded the undiscounted cash flows and therefore the Disks asset group long-lived assets were deemed to be impaired. The impairment charge was measured as the amount of carrying value in excess of fair value of the long-lived assets, with fair value determined using a DCF model and a combination of sales comparison and cost approach valuation methods including an estimate for economic obsolescence. The impairment charge of $428 recorded in the second quarter of 2019 impacted properties, plants, and equipment; intangible assets; and certain other noncurrent assets by $198, $197, and $33, respectively. The impairment charge was recorded in Restructuring and other charges in the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
During the second quarter of 2018, the Company updated its three-year strategic plan and determined that there was a decline in the forecasted financial performance for the Disks asset group within the EP&F segment. As such, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the long-lived assets by comparing their carrying value of approximately $515 to the estimated undiscounted net cash flows of the Disks asset group, resulting in an estimated fair value in excess of their carrying value of approximately 13%; thus, there was no impairment.
Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale. The fair values of all businesses to be divested are estimated using accepted valuation techniques such as a DCF model, valuations performed by third parties, earnings multiples, or indicative bids, when available. A number of significant estimates and assumptions are involved in the application of these techniques, including the forecasting of markets and market share, sales volumes and prices, costs and expenses, and multiple other factors. Management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the estimates are made; however, the fair value that is ultimately realized upon the divestiture of a business may differ from the estimated fair value reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
31


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits. Liabilities and expenses for pension and other postretirement benefits are determined using actuarial methodologies and incorporate significant assumptions, including the interest rate used to discount the future estimated liability, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, and several assumptions relating to the employee workforce (health care cost trend rates, retirement age, and mortality). The pension and other postretirement benefits obligation was $1,719 and $2,461, with a funded status of $(749) and $(930) at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The total benefit obligation reduction of $742 was primarily driven by changes in discount rate. The improvement in the funded status of $181 was primarily driven by changes in discount rates partially offset by actual asset losses in comparison to expected asset returns. Excluding settlements and curtailments, net periodic benefit cost of pension and other postretirement benefits is expected to be approximately $40 in 2023 compared to $22 and $16 in 2022 and 2021, respectively. These costs increased by $6, or 38%, in 2022 compared to 2021 as a result of changes in discount rates and annuity purchases.
Employer contributions for pension benefits were $43 and $96 for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. No additional employer contributions for pension benefits were required for the pension settlements in 2022. Benefits paid for other postretirement benefits were $13 and $17 for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Total pension contributions and other postretirement benefits paid decreased by $57, or 50%, in 2022 compared to 2021 primarily driven by additional 2021 contributions related to annuity buyouts and funding balances of the plans. Cash pension contributions in 2023 are expected to be approximately $45. Howmet’s funded status under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act was approximately 87% as of January 1, 2022.
The interest rate used to discount future estimated liabilities for the U.S. is determined using a Company-specific yield curve model (above-median) developed with the assistance of an external actuary, while both the U.K. and Canada utilize models developed by the respective actuary. The cash flows of the plans’ projected benefit obligations are discounted using a single equivalent rate derived from yields on high quality corporate bonds, which represent a broad diversification of issuers in various sectors, including finance and banking, industrials, transportation, and utilities, among others. The yield curve model parallelsmodels parallel the plans’ projected cash flows, which have ana global average duration of 10 years. The underlying cash flows of the bonds included in the modelmodels exceed the cash flows needed to satisfy the Company’s plans’ obligations multiple times. In 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, the discount rate used to determine benefit obligations for U.S. pension and other postretirement benefit plans was 3.30%5.40%, 4.35%2.70%, and 3.75%2.40%, respectively. The impact on the liabilities of a change in the discount rate of 1/4 of 1% would be approximately $220$36 and either a charge or credit of approximatelyless than $1 to after-tax earnings in the following year.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is generally applied to a five-year market-related value of plan assets (a fair value at the plan measurement date is used for certain non-U.S. plans).assets. The process used by management to develop this assumption is one that relies on a combination of historical asset return information and forward-looking returns by asset class. As it relates to historical asset return information, management focuses on various historical moving averages when developing this assumption. While consideration is given to recent performance and historical returns, the assumption represents a long-term, prospective return. Management also incorporates expected future returns on current and planned asset allocations using information from various external investment managers and consultants, as well as management’s own judgment.
For 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, management used 7.00%6.70%, 7.00%6.20%, and 7.75%6.00%, respectively, as its weighted-average global expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, which was based on the prevailing and planned strategic asset allocations, as well as estimates of future returns by asset class. Theseclass for each plan. These rates fellwere within the respective range of the 20-year moving average of actual performance and the expected future

return developed by asset class.class for each plan. The increase in expected long-term rate of return of plan assets compared to prior years is due to current asset allocations and estimates of future returns by country. For 2020,2023, management anticipates that 7.00% will be the expected long-term rate of return. The decrease of 75 basis points in the 2018 expected long-term rate of return was due to a decrease in the expected return by asset class and the 20-year moving average.for global plan assets will remain at approximately 7%. A change in the assumption for the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 1/4 of 1% would impact after-tax earnings by approximately $9$3 for 2020.2023.
In 2019,2022, net income of $146 (after-tax) was recorded in other comprehensive loss, primarily due to the increase in the discount rate and amortization of actuarial losses, partially offset by plan asset returns that were less than expected. In 2021, net income of $181 (after-tax) was recorded in other comprehensive loss, primarily due to the increase in the discount rate, plan asset performance that was greater than expected, and amortization of actuarial losses.In 2020, a net loss of $388$46 (after-tax) was recorded in other comprehensive loss, primarily due to the decrease in the discount rate, of 105 basis points, which was partially offset by the plan asset performance that was greater than expected, and by the amortization of actuarial losses.In 2018, a net loss of $114 (after-tax) was recorded in other comprehensive loss, primarily due to the impact of the adoption of new accounting guidance that permits a reclassification to Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, as well as the plan asset performance that was less than expected, which were partially offset by the increase in the discount rate of 60 basis points and the amortization of actuarial losses. In 2017, a net loss of $220 (after-tax) was recorded in other comprehensive loss, primarily due to the decrease in the discount rate of 45 basis points and plan asset performance less than expected, which were partially offset by the amortization of actuarial losses.

32


Stock-Based Compensation. ArconicHowmet recognizes compensation expense for employee equity grants using the non-substantive vesting period approach, in which the expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period based on the grant date fair value. Forfeitures are accounted for as they occur. The fair value of new stock options is estimated on the date of grant using a lattice-pricing model. The fair value of performance awards containing a market condition is valued using a Monte Carlo valuation model. Determining the fair value at the grant date requires judgment, including estimates for the average risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, volatility, and exercise behavior. These assumptions may differ significantly between grant dates because of changes in the actual results of these inputs that occur over time.
Compensation expense recorded in 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 20172020 was $78$54 ($7049 after-tax), $50$40 ($3936 after-tax), and $54$46 ($3642 after-tax), respectively.
Income Taxes. The provision (benefit) for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, the provision (benefit) for income taxes represents income taxes paid or payable (or received or receivable) for thebased on current year pre-tax income plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid, and result from differences between the financial and tax bases of Arconic’sHowmet’s assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when enacted.
The 2017 Act created a new requirement that certain income earned by foreign subsidiaries, Global Intangible Low Taxed Income (GILTI), must be included in the gross income of the U.S. shareholder. The 2017 Act also established the Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT). Until regulations are finalized, judgement will be required to apply preliminary guidance, including proposed regulations, to Arconic’s facts and circumstances.
Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, management considers all potential sources of taxable income, including income available in carrybackcarry-back periods, future reversals of taxable temporary differences, projections of taxable income, and income from tax planning strategies, as well as all available positive and negative evidence. Positive evidence includes factors such as a history of profitable operations, projections of future profitability within the carryforward period, including from tax planning strategies, and Arconic’sHowmet’s experience with similar operations. Existing favorable contracts and the ability to sell products into established markets are additional positive evidence. Negative evidence includes items such as cumulative losses, projections of future losses, or carryforward periods that are not long enough to allow for the utilization of a deferred tax asset based on existing projections of income. Deferred tax assets for which no valuation allowance is recorded may not be realized upon changes in facts and circumstances, resulting in a future charge to establish a valuation allowance. Existing valuation allowances are re-examined under the same standards of positive and negative evidence. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be realized, the appropriate amount of the valuation allowance, if any, is released. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are also re-measured to reflect changes in underlying tax rates due to law changes and the granting and lapse of tax holidays.
In 2018, Arconic made a final accountingIt is Howmet’s policy election to apply a tax law ordering approach when considering the need for a valuation allowance on net operating losses expected to offset GILTI income inclusions. Under this approach, reductions in cash tax savings are not considered as part of the valuation allowance assessment. Instead, future GILTI inclusions are considered a source of taxable income that support the realizability of deferred tax assets.
It is Howmet’s policy to treat taxes due from future inclusions in U.S. taxable income related to GILTI as a current period expense when incurred.
Tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return are recorded when such benefits meet a more likely than not threshold. Otherwise, these tax benefits are recorded when a tax position has been effectively settled, which means that the statute of limitations has expired or the appropriate taxing authority has completed their examination even though the statute of limitations remains open. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are

recognized as part of the provision for income taxes and are accrued beginning in the period that such interest and penalties would be applicable under relevant tax law until such time that the related tax benefits are recognized.
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance. Litigation and Contingent Liabilities.See From time to time, we are involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations, and proceedings. These matters may include speculative claims for substantial or indeterminate amounts of damages. Management determines the Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance sectionlikelihood of an unfavorable outcome based on many factors, such as the nature of the matter, available defenses and case strategy, progress of the matter, views and opinions of legal counsel and other advisors, applicability and success of appeals processes, and the outcome of similar historical matters, among others. If an unfavorable outcome is deemed probable and the amount of the potential loss can be estimated, the most reasonable loss estimate is recorded. If an unfavorable outcome of a matter is deemed probable but the loss is not reasonably estimable, or if an unfavorable outcome is deemed reasonably possible, then the matter is disclosed but no liability is recorded. Legal matters are reviewed on a continuous basis to determine if there has been a change in management’s judgment regarding the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the estimate of a potential loss. For more information on these matters, see Note VA to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K.

33


Recently IssuedAdopted Accounting Guidance.
See the Recently IssuedAdopted Accounting Guidance section of Note BA to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance.
See the Recently Issued Accounting Guidance section of Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Form 10-K.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not material.

34


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
35



Management’s Reports to ArconicHowmet Shareholders
Management’s Report on Financial Statements and Practices
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) were prepared by management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. The statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include amounts that are based on management’s best judgments and estimates. The other financial information included in the annual report is consistent with that in the financial statements.
Management also recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs according to the highest standards of personal and corporate conduct. This responsibility is characterized and reflected in key policy statements issued from time to time regarding, among other things, conduct of its business activities within the laws of the host countries in which the Company operates and potentially conflicting outside business interests of its employees. The Company maintains a systematic program to assess compliance with these policies.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, management has conducted an assessment, including testing, using the criteria in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)(2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)(“COSO”). The Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Based on the assessment, management has concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)(2013) issued by the COSO.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192022 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein.
 
/s/ John C. Plant
John C. Plant

Executive
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Ken Giacobbe
Ken Giacobbe

Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


36


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income (loss), of changes in equity, of comprehensive income and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note A to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

37


Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit mattersmatter communicated below are mattersis a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that werewas communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relaterelates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit mattersmatter below, providing a separate opinionsopinion on the critical audit mattersmatter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.it relates.
Goodwill Impairment Assessment - Engine Products and Engineered Structures Reporting UnitsUnit
As described in Notes A and NP to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill balance was $4,493$4,013 million as of December 31, 2019,2022, and the amount of the goodwill associated with the Engine Products and Engineered Structures reporting unitsunit was $2,164 million and $289 million, respectively.$304 million. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually (in the fourth quarter) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. TheUnder the quantitative impairment test, the evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair value is estimated by management using a discounted cash flow model. The determination of fair value using this technique requires management to use significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasting operating cash flows, including sales growth, (volumes and pricing), production costs, capital spending and discount rate.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment assessment of the Engine Products and Engineered Structures reporting unitsunit is a critical audit matter are there wasthe significant judgment by management when developingdetermining the fair value measurements of the reporting units.unit. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, effortsubjectivity, and subjectivityeffort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidencemanagement’s significant assumptions related to management’s cash flow projections and significant assumptions, including sales growth, (volumes and pricing), production costs, and discount rates.rate. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s annual goodwill impairment assessment, including controls over the valuation of the Company’s Engineered Structures reporting units.unit. These procedures also included, among others (i) testing management’s process for developingdetermining the fair value estimates;of the reporting unit; (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model and performing sensitivity analyses over the assumptions in the model; (iii) testing the completeness accuracy, and relevanceaccuracy of underlying data used in the model; and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management includingrelated to sales growth, (volumes and pricing), production costs, and discount rates.rate. Evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to sales growth (volumes and pricing) and production costs involved evaluating whether the significant assumptions used by management were reasonable by consideringconsidering: (i) the current and past performance of the reporting units, obtaining evidence to supportunit; (ii) the reasonableness of the assumptions,consistency with relevant industry data; and (iii) considering whether the assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the discounted cash flow models and certain significant assumptions, including the discount rates.
Properties, Plants, and Equipment Impairment Assessment - Disks Asset Group
As described in Notes A and M to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated properties, plants and equipment balance was $5,463 million as of December 31, 2019. During the second quarter of 2019, management recorded an impairment charge of $428 million to reduce the carrying value of the long-lived assets in the Disks asset group to their fair value, which included impairment charges to properties, plants and equipment of $198 million. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group may not be recoverable. The impairment charge was measured as the amount of carrying value in excess of fair value of the long-lived assets, with fair value determined using a discounted cash flow model and a combinationthe evaluation of sales comparison and cost approach valuation methods, including an estimate for economic obsolescence.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the properties, plants, and equipment impairment assessment of the Disks asset group is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management when developing the fair value of the properties, plants and equipment in the Disks asset group. This in turn led to a high

degree of auditor judgment, effort and subjectivity in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to management’s valuation methods and significant assumptions, including economic obsolescence. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s asset group impairment assessment, including controls over the valuation of the asset group. These procedures also included, among others, evaluating (i) the appropriateness of management’s valuation methodologies and (ii) the reasonableness of the estimated economic obsolescence utilized in determining the fair value of properties, plants and equipment in the Disks asset group. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were utilized to assist in the evaluation of the valuation methods and certaindiscount rate significant assumptions, including economic obsolescence.

assumption.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 26, 202014, 2023
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1950.

38
Arconic

Howmet Aerospace Inc. and subsidiaries
Statement of Consolidated Operations
(in millions, except per-share amounts) 
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Sales (B)
$14,192
 $14,014
 $12,960
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of expenses below)11,227
 11,397
 10,221
Selling, general administrative, and other expenses704
 604
 715
Research and development expenses70
 103
 109
Provision for depreciation and amortization536
 576
 551
Impairment of goodwill (A and N)

 
 719
Restructuring and other charges (C)
620
 9
 165
Operating income1,035
 1,325
 480
Interest expense (D)
338
 378
 496
Other expense (income), net (E)
122
 79
 (486)
Income before income taxes575
 868
 470
Provision for income taxes (G)
105
 226
 544
Net income (loss)$470
 $642
 $(74)
      
Amounts Attributable to Arconic Common Shareholders (I):
     
Net income (loss)$477
 $651
 $(127)
Earnings (loss) per share - basic$1.05
 $1.33
 $(0.28)
Earnings (loss) per share - diluted$1.03
 $1.30
 $(0.28)
Average Shares Outstanding (I):
     
Average shares outstanding - basic446
 483
 451
Average shares outstanding - diluted463
 503
 451
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Sales (D)
$5,663 $4,972 $5,259 
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of expenses below)4,103 3,596 3,878 
Selling, general administrative, and other expenses288 251 277 
Research and development expenses32 17 17 
Provision for depreciation and amortization265 270 279 
Restructuring and other charges (E)
56 90 182 
Operating income919 748 626 
Loss on debt redemption (R)
146 64 
Interest expense, net (F)
229 259 317 
Other expense, net (G)
82 19 74 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes606 324 171 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (I)
137 66 (40)
Income from continuing operations after income taxes$469 $258 $211 
Income from discontinued operations after income taxes (C)
— — 50 
Net income$469 $258 $261 
Amounts Attributable to Howmet Aerospace Inc. Common Shareholders (K):
Net income$467 $256 $259 
Earnings per share - basic
Continuing operations$1.12 $0.60 $0.48 
Discontinued operations$— $— $0.11 
Earnings per share - diluted
Continuing operations$1.11 $0.59 $0.48 
Discontinued operations$— $— $0.11 
Average Shares Outstanding (J):
Average shares outstanding - basic416 430 435 
Average shares outstanding - diluted421 435 439 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

39


Arconic

Howmet Aerospace Inc. and subsidiaries
Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(in millions) 
 Arconic Noncontrolling Interests Total
For the year ended December 31,2019
2018
2017 2019
2018
2017 2019 2018 2017
Net income (loss)$470
 $642
 $(74) $
 $
 $
 $470
 $642
 $(74)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (J):
                 
Change in unrecognized net actuarial loss and prior service cost/benefit related to pension and other postretirement benefits(388) 255
 (220) 
 
 
 (388)
255

(220)
Foreign currency translation adjustments(13) (146) 252
 
 
 2
 (13) (146) 254
Net change in unrealized gains on debt securities3
 (1) (134) 
 
 
 3
 (1) (134)
Net change in unrecognized gains/losses on cash flow hedges(3) (23) 26
 
 
 
 (3) (23) 26
Total Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(401) 85
 (76) 
 
 2
 (401) 85
 (74)
Comprehensive income (loss)$69
 $727
 $(150) $
 $
 $2
 $69
 $727
 $(148)
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Net income$469 $258 $261 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (L):
Change in unrecognized net actuarial loss and prior service cost (benefit) related to pension and other postretirement benefits146 181 (46)
Foreign currency translation adjustments(131)(96)58 
Net change in unrecognized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges(5)
Total Other comprehensive income, net of tax22 80 16 
Comprehensive income$491 $338 $277 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

40
Arconic

Howmet Aerospace Inc. and subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(in millions)
December 31,2019 2018
Assets   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$1,648
 $2,277
Receivables from customers, less allowances of $3 in 2019 and $4 in 2018 (K)
967
 1,047
Other receivables (K)
484
 451
Inventories (L)
2,429
 2,492
Prepaid expenses and other current assets314
 314
Total current assets5,842
 6,581
Properties, plants, and equipment, net (M)
5,463
 5,704
Goodwill (A and N)
4,493
 4,500
Deferred income taxes (G)
608
 573
Intangibles, net (N)
658
 919
Other noncurrent assets (A and O)
514
 416
Total assets$17,578
 $18,693
Liabilities   
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable, trade$2,043
 $2,129
Accrued compensation and retirement costs432
 370
Taxes, including income taxes87
 118
Accrued interest payable112
 113
Other current liabilities (A and O)
418
 356
Short-term debt (P and Q)
1,034
 434
Total current liabilities4,126
 3,520
Long-term debt, less amount due within one year (P and Q)
4,906
 5,896
Accrued pension benefits (F)
2,460
 2,230
Accrued other postretirement benefits (F)
714
 723
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits (A and O)
751
 739
Total liabilities12,957
 13,108
Contingencies and commitments (T)

 

Equity   
Arconic shareholders’ equity:   
Preferred stock (H)
55
 55
Common stock (H)
433
 483
Additional capital (H)
7,319
 8,319
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) (A)
129
 (358)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (A and J)
(3,329) (2,926)
Total Arconic shareholders’ equity4,607
 5,573
Noncontrolling interests14
 12
Total equity4,621
 5,585
Total liabilities and equity$17,578
 $18,693
December 31,20222021
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$791 $720 
Receivables from customers, less allowances of $1 in 2022 and $— in 2021 (M)
506 367 
Other receivables (M)
31 53 
Inventories (N)
1,609 1,402 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets206 195 
Total current assets3,143 2,737 
Properties, plants, and equipment, net (O)
2,332 2,467 
Goodwill (A and P)
4,013 4,067 
Deferred income taxes (I)
54 184 
Intangibles, net (P)
521 549 
Other noncurrent assets (A and Q)
192 215 
Total assets$10,255 $10,219 
Liabilities
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable, trade$962 $732 
Accrued compensation and retirement costs195 198 
Taxes, including income taxes48 61 
Accrued interest payable75 74 
Other current liabilities (A and Q)
202 183 
Short-term debt (R and S)
— 
Total current liabilities1,482 1,253 
Long-term debt, less amount due within one year (R and S)
4,162 4,227 
Accrued pension benefits (H)
633 771 
Accrued other postretirement benefits (H)
109 153 
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits (A and Q)
268 307 
Total liabilities6,654 6,711 
Contingencies and commitments (V)
Equity
Howmet Aerospace Inc. shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock (J)
55 55 
Common stock (J)
412 422 
Additional capital (J)
3,947 4,291 
Retained earnings (A)
1,028 603 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (A and L)
(1,841)(1,863)
Total equity3,601 3,508 
Total liabilities and equity$10,255 $10,219 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

41
Arconic

Howmet Aerospace Inc. and subsidiaries
Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows
(in millions)
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Operating activities     
Net income (loss)$470
 $642
 $(74)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided from (used for) operations:     
Depreciation and amortization536
 576
 551
Deferred income taxes(19) 31
 434
Impairment of goodwill (A and N)

 
 719
Restructuring and other charges620
 9
 165
Net loss (gain) from investing activities - asset sales7
 10
 (513)
Net periodic pension benefit cost (F)
115
 130
 217
Stock-based compensation60
 50
 67
Other13
 75
 112
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions, divestitures, and foreign currency translation adjustments:     
(Increase) in receivables(977) (1,142) (915)
(Increase) in inventories(3) (74) (192)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets4
 (1) 11
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable, trade(56) 339
 62
(Decrease) in accrued expenses(42) (190) (116)
(Decrease) increase in taxes, including income taxes(2) 104
 (23)
Pension contributions(268) (298) (310)
(Increase) in noncurrent assets(7) (20) (41)
(Decrease) in noncurrent liabilities(45) (24) (193)
Cash provided from (used for) operations406
 217
 (39)
Financing Activities     
Net change in short-term borrowings (original maturities of three months or less)2
 (7) (2)
Additions to debt (original maturities greater than three months) (P)
400
 600
 816
Payments on debt (original maturities greater than three months) (P)
(806) (1,103) (1,634)
Premiums paid on early redemption of debt (P)

 (17) (52)
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options56
 16
 50
Dividends paid to shareholders(57) (119) (162)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 (14)
Repurchase of common stock (H)
(1,150) 
 
Other(13) (19) (17)
Cash used for financing activities(1,568) (649) (1,015)
Investing Activities     
Capital expenditures(586) (768) (596)
Proceeds from the sale of assets and businesses (S)
103
 309
 (9)
Sales of investments (U)
73
 9
 890
Cash receipts from sold receivables (K)
995
 1,016
 792
Other (U)
(2) (1) 243
Cash provided from investing activities583
 565
 1,320
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
 (4) 9
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(579) 129
 275
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year2,282
 2,153
 1,878
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$1,703
 $2,282
 $2,153
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Operating activities
Net income$469 $258 $261 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided from operations:
Depreciation and amortization265 270 338 
Deferred income taxes79 38 
Restructuring and other charges56 90 164 
Net realized and unrealized losses18 
Net periodic pension cost (H)
24 18 51 
Stock-based compensation54 41 45 
Loss on debt redemption (R)
146 64 
Other12 20 (5)
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions, divestitures, and foreign currency translation adjustments:
Increase in receivables(161)(337)(238)
(Increase) decrease in inventories(234)60 74 
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets(6)11 (2)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, trade246 144 (381)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses23 (146)(217)
(Decrease) increase in taxes, including income taxes(12)(41)98 
Pension contributions(43)(96)(257)
Decrease (increase) in noncurrent assets(13)39 
Decrease in noncurrent liabilities(60)(23)(35)
Cash provided from operations733 449 
Financing Activities
Net change in short-term borrowings(5)(9)(15)
Additions to debt (R)
— 700 2,400 
Repurchases and payments on debt (R)
(69)(1,538)(2,043)
Debt issuance costs (C and R)
— (11)(61)
Premiums paid on early redemption of debt (R)
(2)(138)(59)
Repurchase of common stock (J)
(400)(430)(73)
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options16 22 33 
Dividends paid to shareholders (J)
(44)(19)(11)
Net cash transferred to Arconic Corporation at separation— — (500)
Other(22)(21)(40)
Cash used for financing activities(526)(1,444)(369)
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures (D and T)
(193)(199)(267)
Proceeds from the sale of assets and businesses (O and U)
58 32 114 
Sales of debt securities— — 
Cash receipts from sold receivables (M)
— 267 422 
Other— 
Cash (used for) provided from investing activities(135)107 271 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(2)(1)(3)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash70 (889)(92)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year722 1,611 1,703 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$792 $722 $1,611 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

42
Arconic

Howmet Aerospace Inc. and subsidiaries
Statement of Changes in Consolidated Equity
(in millions, except per-share amounts)
 Arconic Shareholders  
  
Preferred
stock
Mandatory
convertible
preferred
stock
Common
stock
Additional
capital
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Noncontrolling
interests
Total
equity
Balance at December 31, 2016$55
$3
$438
$8,214
$(1,027)$(2,568)$26
$5,141
Net loss



(74)

(74)
Other comprehensive (loss) income (J)





(76)2
(74)
Cash dividends declared:       
Preferred–Class A @ $3.75 per share



(2)

(2)
Preferred–Class B @ $20.1563 per share



(51)

(51)
Common @ $0.24 per share



(109)

(109)
Stock-based compensation (H)



67



67
Common stock issued: compensation plans (H)



21



21
Conversion of mandatory convertible preferred stock (H)

(3)39
(36)



Issuance of common stock (H)


4




4
Distributions





(14)(14)
Other



15


15
Balance at December 31, 2017$55
$
$481
$8,266
$(1,248)$(2,644)$14
$4,924
Adoption of accounting standard (A)




367
(367)

Net income



642


642
Other comprehensive income (J)





85

85
Cash dividends declared:       
Preferred–Class A @ $3.75 per share



(2)

(2)
Common @ $0.24 per share



(117)

(117)
Stock-based compensation (H)



50



50
Common stock issued: compensation plans (H)


2
3



5
Other





(2)(2)
Balance at December 31, 2018$55
$
$483
$8,319
$(358)$(2,926)$12
$5,585
Adoption of accounting standard (A)




75
(2)
73
Net income



470


470
Other comprehensive loss (J)





(401)
(401)
Cash dividends declared:       
Preferred–Class A @ $3.75 per share



(2)

(2)
Common @ $0.12 per share



(56)

(56)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock (H)


(55)(1,095)


(1,150)
Stock-based compensation (H)



57



57
Common stock issued: compensation plans (H)


5
36



41
Other


2


2
4
Balance at December 31, 2019$55
$
$433
$7,319
$129
$(3,329)$14
$4,621
 Howmet Shareholders 
  Preferred
stock
Common
stock
Additional
capital
Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Noncontrolling
interests
Total
equity
Balance at December 31, 2019$55 $433 $7,319 $113 $(3,329)$14 $4,605 
Net income— — — 261 — — 261 
Other comprehensive income (L)
— — — — 16 — 16 
Cash dividends declared:
Preferred–Class A @ $3.75 per share— — — (2)— — (2)
Common @ $0.02 per share— — — (8)— — (8)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock (J)
— (3)(70)— — — (73)
Stock-based compensation (J)
— — 45 — — — 45 
Common stock issued: compensation plans (J)
— (9)— — — (6)
Distributions to Arconic Corporation (C)
— — (2,617)— 1,370 (14)(1,261)
Balance at December 31, 2020$55 $433 $4,668 $364 $(1,943)$— $3,577 
Net income— — — 258 — — 258 
Other comprehensive income (L)
— — — — 80 — 80 
Cash dividends declared:
Preferred–Class A @ $3.75 per share— — — (2)— — (2)
Common @ $0.04 per share— — — (17)— — (17)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock (J)
— (13)(417)— — — (430)
Stock-based compensation (J)
— — 40 — — — 40 
Common stock issued: compensation plans (J)
— — — — — 
Balance at December 31, 2021$55 $422 $4,291 $603 $(1,863)$— $3,508 
Net income— — — 469— — 469 
Other comprehensive income (L)
— — — — 22 — 22 
Cash dividends declared:
Preferred–Class A @ $3.75 per share— — — (2)— — (2)
Common @ $0.10 per share— — — (42)— — (42)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock (J)
— (12)(388)— — — (400)
Stock-based compensation (J)
— — 54 — — — 54 
Common stock issued: compensation plans (J)
— (10)— — — (8)
Balance at December 31, 2022$55 $412 $3,947 $1,028 $(1,841)$— $3,601 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

43
Arconic

Howmet Aerospace Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in millions, except share and per-share amounts)
A. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation. The Consolidated Financial Statements of Howmet Aerospace Inc. (formerly known as Arconic Inc.) and subsidiaries (“Arconic”Howmet” or the “Company” or “we” or “our”) are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP)(“GAAP”) and require management to make certain judgments, estimates, and assumptions. These estimates are based on historical experience and, in some cases, assumptions based on current and future market experience, including considerations relating to the impact of COVID-19 and changes in the aerospace industry as a result of the pandemic. The impact of these changes is rapidly changing and of unknown duration and macroeconomic impact and, as a result, these conditions remain highly uncertain. We have made our best estimates using all relevant information available at the time, but it is possible that our estimates will differ from our actual results and affect the Consolidated Financial Statements in future periods and potentially require adverse adjustments to the recoverability of goodwill, intangible and long-lived assets, the realizability of deferred tax assets, and other judgments and estimations and assumptions. These may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. They also may affect the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates upon subsequent resolution of identified matters. Certain amounts in previously issued financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation (see Note B).presentation.
The separation of Arconic Inc. into two standalone, publicly-traded companies, Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Arconic Corporation, (the “Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction”) occurred on April 1, 2020. The Engineered Products and Forgings (“EP&F”) segment remained in the existing company, which was renamed Howmet Aerospace Inc. The Global Rolled Products (“GRP”) segment was spun off and was named Arconic Corporation. In the thirdsecond quarter of 2019,2020, in conjunction with the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction, the Company realigned its operations by eliminating its Transportationseparating the former EP&F segment into four new segments: Engine Products, Fastening Systems, Engineered Structures and Construction Solutions (TCS) segment and transferring the Forged Wheels business to the Engineered Products and Forgings (EP&F) segment and the Building and Construction Systems (BCS) business to the Global Rolled Products (GRP) segment.Wheels. See Note DB for further details.
On February 8, 2019,The financial results of Arconic Corporation for all periods prior to the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction have been retrospectively reflected in the Statement of Consolidated Operations as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from continuing operations and segment results for all periods presented. The cash flows, comprehensive income, and equity related to Arconic Corporation have not been segregated and are included in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows, Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income, and Statement of Changes in Consolidated Equity, respectively, for all periods prior to the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction. See Note C for additional information related to the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction and discontinued operations.
The Company announced the separationderived approximately 46%, 41%, and 49% of its portfolio into two independent, publicly-traded companies (the "Separationrevenue from products sold to the commercial aerospace market for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, which is substantially less than the pre-pandemic 2019 annual rate of Arconic")approximately 60%. Due to the global COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the commercial aerospace industry to date, there has been a decrease in domestic and international air travel, which in turn has adversely affected demand for narrow-body and wide-body aircraft. Although domestic air travel now approximates pre-pandemic levels, China domestic air travel is still below pre-pandemic 2019 levels on an average monthly basis in 2022. International travel also continues to be lower than pre-pandemic 2019 levels. We expect commercial aerospace growth to continue with narrow-body demand returning faster than wide-body demand. The EP&F segment will remaincommercial wide-body aircraft market is taking longer to recover, which is creating a shift in our product mix compared to pre-pandemic conditions. In addition to the existing company (Remain Co.)impact from the pandemic, the timing and level of future aircraft builds by original equipment manufacturers are subject to changes and uncertainties, such as declines in Boeing 787 production rates due to delays in its recertification, which will be renamed Howmet Aerospace Inc. at separation. The GRP segment will comprise Spin Co. and will be named Arconic Corporation at separation. The Company is targetingmay cause our future results to complete the Separation of Arconic on April 1, 2020. See Note U for further details.differ from prior periods due to changes in product mix in certain segments.
Principles of Consolidation. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. and companies in which ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. has a controlling interest. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Investments in affiliates in which ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. cannot exercise significant influence that do not have readily determinable fair values are accounted for at cost minusless impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer.
Management also evaluates whether an Arconica Howmet Aerospace Inc. entity or interest is a variable interest entity and whether ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. is the primary beneficiary. Consolidation is required if both of these criteria are met. ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. does not have any variable interest entities requiring consolidation.
Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.
44


Inventory Valuation. Inventories are carried at the lower of cost andor net realizable value with cost for approximately half of U.S. inventories determined under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. The cost of other inventories is determined under a combination of the first-in, first-out (FIFO)(“FIFO”), last-in, first-out (“LIFO”), and average-cost methods. See Note N for further details.
Properties, Plants, and Equipment. Properties, plants, and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is recorded principally on the straight-line method at rates based on the estimated useful lives of the assets.
The following table details the weighted-average useful lives of structures and machinery and equipment by reporting segment (numbers in years):
 Structures Machinery and equipment
Engineered Products and Forgings29 17
Global Rolled Products31 21

StructuresMachinery and equipment
   Engine Products3017
   Fastening Systems2717
   Engineered Structures2819
   Forged Wheels2818
Gains or losses from the sale of asset groups or properties are generally recorded in Restructuring and other charges while the sale of individual assets are recorded in Other expense, (income), net (see policy below for assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations). Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Interest related to the construction of qualifying assets is capitalized as part of the construction costs.
Properties, plants, and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets (asset group) may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is determined by comparing the estimated undiscounted net cash flows of the operations related to the assets (asset group) to their carrying amount. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of the assets (asset group) exceeds the estimated undiscounted net cash flows. The amount of the impairment loss to be recorded is measured as the excess of the carrying value of the assets (asset group) over their fair value, with fair value determined using the best information available, which generally is a discounted cash flow (DCF)(“DCF”) model. The determination of what constitutes an asset group, the associated estimated undiscounted net cash flows, and the estimated useful lives of the assets also require significant judgments. See Note OM for further information.details.

Goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized; instead, it is reviewed for impairment annually (in the fourth quarter) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist or if a decision is made to sell or realign a business. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include deterioration in general economic conditions, negative developments in equity and credit markets, adverse changes in the markets in which an entity operates, increases in input costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows, or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods, among others. The fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill.
Goodwill is allocated among and evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. For 2019, Arconic had 7Howmet has four reporting units composed of which 4 were included in the EngineeredEngine Products, and Forgings (EP&F) segment (FasteningFastening Systems, Engineered Structures, Engine Products, and Forged Wheels), and 3 were included in the Global Rolled Products (GRP) segment (Global Rolled Products, Aluminum Extrusions, and BCS). More than 90% of Arconic’s total goodwill at December 31, 2019 was allocated to the 4 EP&F reporting units: Engine Products ($2,164), Fastening Systems ($1,607), Engineered Structures ($289), and Forged Wheels ($7).segments.
In reviewing goodwill forHowmet determines annually, based on facts and circumstances, which of its reporting units will be subject to the qualitative assessment. Under the qualitative assessment, various events and circumstances (similar to the impairment an entity hasindicators above) that would affect the option to first assess qualitative factorsestimated fair value of a reporting unit are identified to determine whetherif a quantitative assessment should be performed. Management also considers the existence of events or circumstances leadsmost recent forecasted cash flows and discount rates in determining if the prior fair value measurement estimate may be reduced to a determinationlevel that would indicate impairment is more likely than not and compares the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) between the current and prior years for each reporting unit. If management concludes it is more likely than not (greater than 50%) that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity elects to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that an impairment is more likely than not, the entity is then required to perform the quantitative impairment test (described below), otherwise no further analysis is required. An entity also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead,amount, we will proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test. The ultimate outcome of the goodwill impairment review forHowmet will periodically refresh a reporting unit should beunit’s fair value measurement and is based upon a number of factors, including how much fair value exceeded carrying value in the same whether an entity chooses to performmost recent quantitative assessment and the qualitative assessment or proceeds directly to thereporting unit’s recent performance. Our policy is that a quantitative impairment test.
Arconic determines annually, based on facts and circumstances, which of itstest be performed for each reporting units will be subject to the qualitative assessment.unit at least once during every three-year period. For those reporting units where a qualitative assessment is either not performed or for which the conclusion is that an impairment is more likely than not, a quantitative impairment test will be performed. Arconic’s policy is that a quantitative impairment test be performed for each reporting unit at least once during every three-year period.
Under the qualitative assessment, various events and circumstances (or factors) that would affect the estimated fair value of a reporting unit are identified (similar to impairment indicators above). These factors are then classified by the type of impact they would have on the estimated fair value using positive, neutral, and adverse categories based on current business conditions. Additionally, an assessment of the level of impact that a particular factor would have on the estimated fair value is determined using high, medium, and low weighting. Furthermore, management considers the results of the most recent quantitative impairment test completed for a reporting unit and compares the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) between the current and prior years for each reporting unit.
During the 2019 annual review of goodwill, management proceeded directly to the quantitative impairment test for all 7 of its reporting units. The estimated fair values for each of the 7 reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by more than 50%, thus, there was 0 goodwill impairment. Under the quantitative impairment test, the evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Arconic uses a DCF model to estimate the current fair value of its reporting units when testing for impairment, as management believes forecasted cash flows are the best indicator of such fair value. A number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the DCF model to forecast operating cash flows, including sales growth (volumes and pricing), production costs, capital spending, and discount rate. Most of these assumptions vary significantly among the reporting units. Cash flow forecasts are generally based on approved business unit operating plans for the early years and historical relationships in later years. The WACC rate for the individual reporting units is estimated with the assistance of valuation experts. Arconic would recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value without exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
In the first quarter of 2019, management transferred its aluminum extrusions business (Aluminum Extrusions) from Engineered Structures within the EP&F segment to the GRP segment, based on synergies with the GRP segment including similar customer base, technologies, and manufacturing capabilities. Management assessed and concluded that the remaining Engineered Structures business unit and the Aluminum Extrusions business unit represent reporting units. As a result of the reorganization, goodwill of $110 was reallocated from Engineered Structures to Aluminum Extrusions and these reporting units were evaluated for impairment during the first quarter of 2019. The estimated fair value of each of these reporting units substantially exceeded their carrying value; thus, there was no goodwill impairment. In the second quarter of 2019, management transferred its castings operations from Engineered Structures to Engine Products within the EP&F segment based on process expertise for investment castings that existed within Engine Products. As a result, goodwill of $105 was reallocated from Engineered Structures to Engine Products and these reporting units were evaluated for impairment during the second quarter of 2019. The estimated fair value of each of these reporting units substantially exceeded their carrying value; thus, there was no impairment. As a result of the elimination of the TCS segment in the third quarter of 2019 (see Note B), the Company transferred $7 of

Forged Wheels goodwill and $68 of BCS goodwill from the TCS segment to the EP&F and GRP segments, respectively. Both Forged Wheels and BCS are considered reporting units.
In the second quarter of 2019, as a result of the decline in the forecasted financial performance and related impairment of long-lived assets of the Disks asset group within Engine Products (see Note M), the Company also performed an interim impairment evaluation of goodwill for Engine Products. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit was substantially in excess of its carrying value; thus, there was no impairment of goodwill.
In connection with the interim impairment evaluation of long-lived assets for the Disks asset group within Engine Products in the second quarter of 2018 (see Note M), which resulted from a decline in forecasted financial performance for the business in connection with its updated three-year strategic plan, the Company also performed an interim impairment evaluation of goodwill for Engine Products. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit was substantially in excess of the carrying value; thus, there was 0 impairment of goodwill.
Goodwill impairment tests in 2018 and 2017 indicated that goodwill was not impaired for any of the Company’s reporting units, except for the Arconic Forgings and Extrusions business (AFE) (the AFE operations were realigned and transferred to Aluminum Extrusions and Engine Products) whose estimated fair value was lower than its carrying value. As such, Arconic recorded an impairment for the full amount of goodwill in the AFE reporting unit of $719 in 2017. The decrease in fair value of AFE was primarily due to unfavorable performance that was impacting operating margins and a higher discount rate due to an increase in the risk-free rate of return, while the carrying value increased compared to prior year.
Other Intangible Assets. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized while intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized generally on a straight-line basis over the periods benefited.
45


The following table details the weighted-average useful lives of software and other intangible assets by reporting segment (numbers in years):
 Software Other intangible assets
Engineered Products and Forgings5 32
Global Rolled Products5 13

SoftwareOther intangible assets
   Engine Products732
   Fastening Systems623
   Engineered Structures418
   Forged Wheels425
Leases. The Company determines whether a contract contains a lease at inception. The Company leases land and buildings, plant equipment, vehicles, and computer equipment which have been classified as operating leases. Certain real estate leases include one or more options to renew; the exercise of lease renewal options is at the Company’s discretion. The Company includes renewal option periods in the lease term when it is determined that the options are reasonably certain to be exercised. Certain of Arconic'sHowmet's real estate lease agreements include rental payments that either have fixed contractual increases over time or adjust periodically for inflation. Certain of the Company's lease agreements include variable lease payments. The variable portion of payments is not included in the initial measurement of the right-of-use asset or lease liability due to the uncertainty of the payment amount and is recorded as lease cost in the period incurred. The Company also rents or subleases certain real estate to third parties, which is not material to the consolidated financial statements.
Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities with an initial term greater than 12 months are recorded on the balance sheet at the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the lease commencement date and are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company uses an incremental collateralized borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of future payments, as most of its leases do not provide an implicit rate. The operating lease right-of-use assets also include any lease prepayments made and wereare reduced by lease incentives and accrued exit costs.
Environmental Matters. Expenditures for current operations are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Expenditures relating to existing conditions caused by past operations, which will not contribute to future sales, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when remediation costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The liability may include costs such as site investigations, consultant fees, feasibility studies, outside contractors, and monitoring expenses. Estimates are generally not discounted or reduced by potential claims for recovery. Claims for recovery are recognized when probable and as agreements are reached with third parties. The estimates also include costs related to other potentially responsible parties to the extent that ArconicHowmet has reason to believe such parties will not fully pay their proportionate share. The liability is continuously reviewed and adjusted to reflect current remediation progress, prospective estimates of required activity, and other factors that may be relevant, including changes in technology or regulations.
Litigation Matters.and Contingent Liabilities. For assertedFrom time to time, we are involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations, and assessments, liabilities are recorded when an unfavorable outcomeproceedings. These matters may include speculative claims for substantial or indeterminate amounts of a matter is deemed to be probable and the loss is reasonably estimable.damages. Management determines the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome based on many factors, such as the nature of the matter, available defenses and case strategy, progress of the matter, views and opinions of legal counsel and other advisors, applicability and success of appeals processes, and the outcome of similar

historical matters, among others. OnceIf an unfavorable outcome is deemed probable management weighsand the probabilityamount of the potential loss can be estimated, losses, and the most reasonable loss estimate is recorded. If an unfavorable outcome of a matter is deemed to beprobable but the loss is not reasonably estimable, or if an unfavorable outcome is deemed reasonably possible, then the matter is disclosed andbut no liability is recorded. With respect to unasserted claims or assessments, management must first determine that the probability that an assertion will be made is likely, then, a determination as to the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to reasonably estimate the potential loss is made. Legal matters are reviewed on a continuous basis to determine if there has been a change in management’s judgment regarding the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the estimate of a potential loss.
Revenue Recognition. The Company's contracts with customers are comprised of acknowledged purchase orders incorporating the Company’s standard terms and conditions, or for larger customers, may also generally include terms under negotiated multi-year agreements. These contracts with customers typically consist of the manufacture of products which represent single performance obligations that are satisfied upon transfer of control of the product to the customer. The Company produces fastening systems; seamless rolled rings; investment castings, including airfoils and forged jet engine components;airfoils; extruded, machined and formed aircraft parts; aluminum sheet and plate; integrated aluminum structural systems; architectural extrusions; and forged aluminum commercial vehicle wheels. Transfer of control is assessed based on alternative use of the products we produce and our enforceable right to payment for performance to date under the contract terms. Transfer of control and revenue recognition generally occur upon shipment or delivery of the product, which is when title, ownership and risk of loss pass to the customer and is based on the applicable shipping terms. The shipping terms vary across all businesses and depend on the product, the country of origin, and the type of transportation (truck, train, or vessel). An invoice for payment is issued at time of shipment. Our business unitssegments set commercial terms on which ArconicHowmet sells products to its customers. These terms are influenced by industry custom, market conditions, product line (specialty versus commodity products), and other considerations.
46


In certain circumstances, ArconicHowmet receives advanced payments from its customers for product to be delivered in future periods. These advanced payments are recorded as deferred revenue until the product is delivered and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer in accordance with the terms of the contract. Deferred revenue is included in Other current liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits onin the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Advanced payments were $32 and $46 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, the provision for income taxes represents income taxes paid or payable (or received or receivable) for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid, and result from differences between the financial and tax bases of Arconic’sHowmet’s assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when enacted.
Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not (greater than 50%) that a tax benefit will not be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, management considers all potential sources of taxable income, including income available in carryback periods, future reversals of taxable temporary differences, projections of taxable income, and income from tax planning strategies, as well as all available positive and negative evidence. Positive evidence includes factors such as a history of profitable operations, projections of future profitability within the carryforward period, including from tax planning strategies, and Arconic’sHowmet’s experience with similar operations. Existing favorable contracts and the ability to sell products into established markets are additional positive evidence. Negative evidence includes items such as cumulative losses, projections of future losses, or carryforward periods that are not long enough to allow for the utilization of a deferred tax asset based on existing projections of income. Deferred tax assets for which no valuation allowance is recorded may not be realized upon changes in facts and circumstances, resulting in a future charge to establish a valuation allowance. Existing valuation allowances are re-examined under the same standards of positive and negative evidence. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be realized, the appropriate amount of the valuation allowance, if any, is released. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are also re-measuredremeasured to reflect changes in underlying tax rates due to law changes and the granting and lapse of tax holidays.
In 2018, Arconic made a final accountingIt is Howmet’s policy election to apply a tax law ordering approach when considering the need for a valuation allowance on net operating losses expected to offset Global Intangible Low TaxedLow-Taxed Income (GILTI)(“GILTI”) income inclusions. Under this approach, reductions in cash tax savings are not considered as part of the valuation allowance assessment. Instead, future GILTI inclusions are considered a source of taxable income that support the realizability of deferred tax assets.
It is Howmet’s policy to treat taxes due from future inclusions in United States (“U.S.”) taxable income related to GILTI as a current period expense when incurred.
Tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return are recorded when such benefits meet a more likely than not threshold. Otherwise, these tax benefits are recorded when a tax position has been effectively settled, which means that the statute of limitations has expired or the appropriate taxing authority has completed their examination even though the statute of limitations remains open. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized as part of the provision for income taxes and are accrued beginning in the period that such interest and penalties would be applicable under relevant tax law until such time that the related tax benefits are recognized.

Stock-Based Compensation. ArconicHowmet recognizes compensation expense for employee equity grants using the non-substantive vesting period approach, in which the expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period based on the grant date fair value. Forfeitures are accounted for as they occur. The fair value of new stock options is estimated on the date of grant using a lattice-pricing model. The fair value of performance awards containing a market condition is valued using a Monte Carlo valuation model. Determining the fair value at the grant date requires judgment, including estimates for the average risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, volatility, and exercise behavior. These assumptions may differ significantly between grant dates because of changes in the actual results of these inputs that occur over time.
Foreign Currency. The local currency is the functional currency for Arconic’sHowmet’s significant operations outside the United States,U.S., except for certain operations in Canada, the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), and Russia,France, where the U.S. dollar is used as the functional currency. The determination of the functional currency for Arconic’sHowmet’s operations is made based on the appropriate economic and management indicators.

47


Acquisitions. Arconic’sHowmet’s business acquisitions are accounted for using the acquisition method. The purchase price is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. For all acquisitions, operating results are included in the Statement of Consolidated Operations from the date of the acquisition.
Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale. For those businesses where management has committed to a plan to divest, each business is valued at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value less cost to sell. If the carrying amount of the business exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair value is estimated using accepted valuation techniques such as a DCF model, valuations performed by third parties, earnings multiples, or indicative bids, when available. A number of significant estimates and assumptions are involved in the application of these techniques, including the forecasting of markets and market share, sales volumes and prices, costs and expenses, and multiple other factors. Management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the estimates are made; however, the fair value that is ultimately realized upon the divestiture of a business may differ from the estimated fair value reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Depreciation and amortization expense is not recorded on assets of a business to be divested once they are classified as held for sale. Businesses to be divested are generally classified in the Consolidated Financial Statements as either discontinued operations or held for sale.
For businesses classified as discontinued operations, the balance sheet amounts and results of operations should beare reclassified from their historical presentation to assets and liabilities of discontinued operations on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and to discontinued operations on the Statement of Consolidated Operations, respectively, for all periods presented. The gains or losses associated with these divested businesses are recorded in discontinued operations on the Statement of Consolidated Operations. The Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows is not required to be reclassified for discontinued operations for any period. Segment information does not include the assets or operating results of businesses classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. These businesses are expected to be disposed of within one year.
For businesses classified as held for sale that do not qualify for discontinued operations treatment, the balance sheet and cash flow amounts should beare reclassified from their historical presentation to assets and liabilities of operations held for sale for all periods presented. The results of operations continue to be reported in continuing operations. The gains or losses associated with these divested businesses are recorded in Restructuring and other charges on the Statement of Consolidated Operations. The segment information includes the assets and operating results of businesses classified as held for sale for all periods presented.
B. Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Guidance
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance. In February 2016,
On January 1, 2021, the Company adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued changes(“FASB”) that were intended to thesimplify various aspects of accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions contained in existing guidance and presentation of leases. These changes require lesseesamending other guidance to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet, initially measured at the present value of the future lease payments for all operating leases with a term greater than 12 months.
These changes became effective for Arconic on January 1, 2019 and have been applied using the modified retrospective approach as of the date of adoption, under which leases existing at, or entered into after, January 1, 2019 were required to be recognized and measured. Prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reflected in accordance with the Company’s historical accounting. The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which amongsimplify several other things, allowed the Company to carry forward the historical lease classification. The Company also elected to separate lease components from non-lease components for all classes of assets.
income tax accounting matters. The adoption of this new lease standard resulted in the Company recording operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $320 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 1, 2019. Also, the Company reclassified cash proceeds of $119 from Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits, assets of $24 from Properties, plants, and equipment, net, and deferred tax assets of $22 from Other noncurrent assets to Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) reflecting the cumulative effect of an accounting change related to the sale-leaseback of the Texarkana, Texas cast house (see Note S). The adoption of the standard had no impact on the Statement of Consolidated Operations or Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows.

In August 2017, the FASB issued guidance that made more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting. It also amended the presentation and disclosure requirements and changed how companies assess effectiveness. It is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with companies’ risk management strategies, simplify the application of hedge accounting, and increase transparency as to the scope and results of hedging programs. These changes became effective for Arconic on January 1, 2019. For cash flow hedges, Arconic recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $2 related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness by decreasing Accumulated other comprehensive loss and increasing Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. The amendments to presentation and disclosure are required prospectively. Arconic has determined that under the new accounting guidance it is able to more broadly use cash flow hedge accounting for its variable priced inventory purchases and customer sales.
In February 2018, the FASB issued guidance that allows an optional reclassification from Accumulated other comprehensive loss to Accumulated deficit for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017. Stranded tax effects were created when deferred taxes, originally established in Other comprehensive income at 35%, were revalued to 21% as a component of income tax expense from continuing operations. The Company elected to early adopt this provision in the fourth quarter of 2018 and reclassified $367 of beneficial stranded tax effects in Accumulated other comprehensive loss to Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) in its Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Changes in Consolidated Equity.
In March 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued guidance to modernize and simplify certain disclosure requirements in a manner that reduces the costs and burdens on preparers while continuing to provide all material information to investors. This guidance became effective on May 2, 2019 and has been applied to filings thereafter. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance.On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted changes issued by the FASB related to the impairment model for expected credit losses. In June 2016, the FASB added aThe new impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (CECL)(“CECL”) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entityThe Company recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses. The CECL model applies to most debt instruments, trade receivables, lease receivables, financial guarantee contracts, and other loan commitments. The CECL model does not have a minimum threshold for recognitioncommitments and requires the measurement of impairment losses and entities will need to measure expected credit losses on assets including those that have a low risk of loss. These changes became effective for Arconic on January 1, 2020. Management has determined that theThe adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued guidance that impacts disclosures for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. These changes becomebecame effective for Arconic'sHowmet's annual report for the year endingended December 31, 2020 with early adoption permitted. Management has determined that the adoption of this guidance willwhich did not have a material impact on theits Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance.
In December 2019,September 2022, the FASB issued guidance that is intended to simplify various aspects related toenhance the accounting for income taxes.transparency of disclosures regarding supplier finance programs. These changes become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years, except for the amendment on January 1, 2021, with early adoption permitted.rollforward information, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of these changes on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

B.
48


In March 2020, the FASB issued amendments that provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform, if certain criteria are met. The amendments apply only to contracts and hedging relationships that reference London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform. These amendments are effective immediately and may be applied prospectively to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated on or before December 31, 2022. In December 2022, the FASB deferred the sunset date to December 31, 2024. In February 2023, the Company amended its Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement to replace LIBOR with the term secured overnight financing rate (“Term SOFR”) as the reference rate for U.S. dollar-denominated loans (See Note R). Management has concluded that the impact of these changes is not expected to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
C. Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction and Discontinued Operations
On April 1, 2020, the Company completed the separation of its business into two independent, publicly-traded companies, which was effected by the distribution (the “Distribution”) by the Company of all of the outstanding common stock of Arconic Corporation to the Company’s stockholders. Following the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction, Arconic Corporation held the Global Rolled Products businesses (global rolled products, aluminum extrusions, and building and construction systems) previously held by the Company. The Company retained the Engineered Products and Forgings businesses (engine products, fastening systems, engineered structures, and forged wheels).
In connection with the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction, the Company entered into several agreements with Arconic Corporation, including the following:a Separation and Distribution Agreement, Tax Matters Agreement, Employee Matters Agreement, certain Patent, Know-How, Trade Secret License and Trademark License Agreements, and Raw Material Supply Agreements.
On February 7, 2020, Arconic Corporation completed an offering of $600 aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior secured second-lien notes due 2028. On March 25, 2020, Arconic Corporation entered into a credit agreement which provided for a $600 aggregate principal amount seven-year senior secured first-lien loan B facility and a revolving credit facility which is guaranteed by certain of Arconic Corporation's wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and secured on a first-priority basis by liens on substantially all assets of Arconic Corporation and subsidiary guarantors. Arconic Corporation used the proceeds to make payment to the Company to fund the transfer of certain assets to Arconic Corporation relating to the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction and for general corporate purposes. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $45 associated with these issuances for the first quarter of 2020 and year ended December 31, 2020.
On February 1, 2020, the Company completed the sale of its rolling mill in Itapissuma, Brazil for $50 in cash, which resulted in a loss of $59, of which $53 was recognized in Restructuring and other charges within discontinued operations in the second half of 2019 and $6 in the first quarter of 2020 and year ended December 31, 2020. On March 1, 2020, the Company sold its hard alloy extrusions plant in South Korea for $62 in cash, which resulted in a gain that was recognized in Restructuring and other charges within discontinued operations in the first quarter of 2020 and year ended December 31, 2020.
Discontinued Operations
The results of operations of Arconic Corporation are presented as Income from discontinued operations after income taxes in the Statement of Consolidated Operations as summarized below:
Year ended December 31,
2020
Sales$1,575 
Cost of goods sold1,293 
Selling, general administrative, research and development and other expenses106 
Provision for depreciation and amortization58 
Restructuring and other credits(18)
Operating income from discontinued operations136 
Interest expense, net
Other expense, net41 
Income from discontinued operations88 
Provision for income taxes38 
Income from discontinued operations after income taxes$50 
49


The following table presents purchases of properties, plants, and equipment, proceeds from the sale of businesses, and the provision for depreciation and amortization of discontinued operations related to Arconic Corporation:
Year ended December 31,
2020
Capital expenditures$72 
Proceeds from the sales of businesses112 
Provision for depreciation and amortization58 
On April 1, 2020, management evaluated the net assets of Arconic Corporation for potential impairment and determined that no impairment charge was required.
The cash flows and equity related to Arconic Corporation have not been segregated and are included in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows or Statement of Comprehensive Income for all periods presented prior to the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction.
D. Segment and Geographic Area Information
ArconicHowmet is a global leader in lightweight metals engineering and manufacturing. Arconic’sHowmet’s innovative, multi-material products, which include nickel, titanium, aluminum, titanium, and nickel,cobalt, are used worldwide in the aerospace automotive,(commercial and defense), commercial transportation, building and construction, industrial applications, defense, and packaging. Arconic’s operations consist of two worldwide reportable segments: EP&F and GRP.other markets. Segment performance under Arconic’sHowmet’s management reporting system is evaluated based on a number of factors; however, the primary measure of performance is Segment Adjusted EBITDA. Prior to the first quarter of 2022, the Company used Segment operating profit. Arconic’sprofit as its primary measure of performance. However, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer believes that Segment Adjusted EBITDA is now a better representation of its business because it provides additional information with respect to the Company’s operating performance and the Company’s ability to meet its financial obligations. Howmet’s definition of Segment operating profitAdjusted EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) is Operating income excluding Special items.net margin plus an add-back for depreciation and amortization. Net margin is equivalent to Sales minus the following items: Cost of goods sold; Selling, general administrative, and other expenses; Research and development expenses; and Provision for depreciation and amortization. Special items, includeincluding Restructuring and other charges, are excluded from Net margin and Impairment of goodwill. Segment operating profitAdjusted EBITDA. Segment Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Differences between the total segment totals and consolidated Arconictotals are in Corporate.
InFollowing the third quarterArconic Inc. Separation Transaction, Howmet’s operations consist of 2019, the Company realigned its operations by eliminating its TCS segment and transferring the Forged Wheels business to its EP&F segment and BCS to its GRP segment, consistent with how the Chief Executive Officer is assessing operating performance and allocating capital in conjunction with the planned Separation of Arconic (see Note U). The Latin America extrusions business, which was formerly part of the Company's TCS segment until its sale in April of 2018 (see Note S), was moved to Corporate. In the first quarter of 2019, management transferred its aluminum extrusions operations from its Engineered Structures business unit within the EP&F segment to the GRP segment, based on synergies with the GRP segmentfour worldwide reportable segments as follows:
Engine Products
Engine Products produces investment castings, including similar customer base, technologies, and manufacturing capabilities. Prior period financial information has been recast to conform to current year presentation.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (see Note A). Transactions among segments are established based on negotiation among the parties. Differences between segment totals and Arconic’s consolidated totals for line items not reconciled are in Corporate.

Engineered Products and Forgings. This segment produces products that are used primarily in the aerospace (commercial and defense), industrial, commercial transportation, and power generation end markets. Such products include fastening systems (aluminum, titanium, steel, and nickel superalloys)airfoils, and seamless rolled rings (mostlyprimarily for aircraft engines and industrial gas turbines. Engine Products produces rotating parts as well as structural parts.
Fastening Systems
Fastening Systems produces aerospace fastening systems, as well as commercial transportation, industrial and other fasteners. The business’s high-tech, multi-material fastening systems are found nose to tail on aircraft and aero engines. Fastening Systems’ products are also critical components of commercial transportation vehicles, automobiles, construction and industrial equipment, and renewable energy sectors.
Engineered Structures
Engineered Structures produces titanium ingots and mill products for aerospace and defense applications and is vertically integrated to produce titanium forgings, extrusions, forming and machining services for airframe, wing, aero-engine, and landing gear components. Engineered Structures also produces aluminum forgings, nickel superalloys); investment castings (nickel superalloys, titanium,forgings, and aluminum), including airfoils; forged jet enginealuminum machined components (e.g., jet engine disks); extruded, machined and forged aircraft parts (titaniumassemblies for aerospace and aluminum); anddefense applications.
Forged Wheels
Forged Wheels provides forged aluminum commercial vehicle wheels all of which are sold directly to customers and through distributors. Approximately 70%ofrelated products for heavy-duty trucks and the third-party sales in this segment are from the aerospace end market. A small part of this segment also produces various forged and machined metal products (titanium and aluminum) for various end markets. Seasonal decreases in sales are experienced for certain products in the third quarter of the year due to the European summer slowdown.
Global Rolled Products. This segment produces aluminum sheet and plate, aluminum extruded and machined parts, integrated aluminum structural systems, and architectural extrusions used in the automotive, aerospace, building and construction, industrial, packaging, and commercial transportation end markets. Products are sold directly to customers and through distributors. While the customer base for flat-rolled products is large, a significant amountmarket.
50



The operating results and assets of Arconic’sthe Company's reportable segments were as follows:
Year endedEngine ProductsFastening SystemsEngineered StructuresForged WheelsTotal
Segment
2022
Sales:
Third-party sales$2,698 $1,117 $790 $1,058 $5,663 
Inter-segment sales— — 10 
Total sales$2,702 $1,117 $796 $1,058 $5,673 
Profit and loss:
Segment Adjusted EBITDA$729 $234 $111 $278 $1,352 
Restructuring and other charges29 46 
Provision for depreciation and amortization125 45 48 40 258 
Other:
Capital expenditures$94 $39 $17 $28 $178 
Total assets4,784 2,661 1,273 701 9,419 
2021
Sales:
Third-party sales$2,282 $1,044 $725 $921 $4,972 
Inter-segment sales— — 10 
Total sales$2,286 $1,044 $731 $921 $4,982 
Profit and loss:
Segment Adjusted EBITDA$564 $239 $103 $294 $1,200 
Restructuring and other charges74 — 16 — 90 
Provision for depreciation and amortization124 49 49 39 261 
Other:
Capital expenditures$74 $42 $21 $45 $182 
Total assets4,663 2,635 1,280 684 9,262 
2020
Sales:
Third-party sales$2,406 $1,245 $927 $679 $5,257 
Inter-segment sales— — 12 
Total sales$2,411 $1,245 $934 $679 $5,269 
Profit and loss:
Segment Adjusted EBITDA$540 $295 $125 $192 $1,152 
Restructuring and other charges36 39 28 106 
Provision for depreciation and amortization123 48 52 39 262 
Other:
Capital expenditures$77 $39 $19 $23 $158 
Total assets4,756 2,707 1,444 628 9,535 
 Engineered Products and Forgings Global Rolled Products Total
2019     
Sales:     
Third-party sales$7,105
 $7,082
 $14,187
Intersegment sales
 183
 183
Total segment sales$7,105
 $7,265
 $14,370
Profit and loss:     
Segment operating profit$1,390
 $625
 $2,015
Restructuring and other charges509
 81
 590
Provision for depreciation and amortization269
 233
 502
2018     
Sales:     
Third-party sales$6,798
 $7,223
 $14,021
Intersegment sales
 205
 205
Total segment sales$6,798
 $7,428
 $14,226
Profit and loss:     
Segment operating profit$1,105
 $481
 $1,586
Restructuring and other charges70
 (157) (87)
Provision for depreciation and amortization289
 253
 542
2017     
Sales:     
Third-party sales$6,300
 $6,540
 $12,840
Intersegment sales
 183
 183
Total segment sales$6,300
 $6,723
 $13,023
Profit and loss:     
Segment operating profit$1,119
 $570
 $1,689
Restructuring and other charges30
 83
 113
Provision for depreciation and amortization275
 243
 518
2019     
Assets:     
Capital expenditures$344
 $189
 $533
Goodwill4,067
 426
 4,493
Total assets(1)
10,034
 4,907
 14,941
2018     
Assets:     
Capital expenditures$407
 $308
 $715
Goodwill4,186
 314
 4,500
Total assets10,494
 4,845
 15,339

51
(1)

Segment assets at December 31, 2019 included operating lease right-of-use assets (see NotesTable of Contents
AThe following table reconciles Total segment capital expenditures, which are presented on an accrual basis, with Capital expenditures as presented on the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows. Differences between the total segment and O). Segment assets forconsolidated totals are in Corporate and discontinued operations, including the EP&F segment at December 31, 2019 were impacted by a long-lived asset impairment chargeimpact of $428 recordedchanges in accrued capital expenditures during the second quarter of 2019 (see Note period.M).
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Total segment capital expenditures$178 $182 $158 
Corporate and discontinued operations15 17 109 
Capital expenditures$193 $199 $267 


The following tables reconcile certain segment information to consolidated totals:totals. Differences between the total segment and consolidated totals are in Corporate.
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Sales:
Total segment sales$5,673 $4,982 $5,269 
Elimination of inter-segment sales(10)(10)(12)
Corporate— — 
Consolidated sales$5,663 $4,972 $5,259 
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Sales:     
Total segment sales$14,370
 $14,226
 $13,023
Elimination of intersegment sales(183) (205) (183)
Corporate5
 (7) 120
Consolidated sales$14,192
 $14,014
 $12,960

For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA$1,352 $1,200 $1,152 
Segment provision for depreciation and amortization(258)(261)(262)
Unallocated amounts:
Restructuring and other charges(56)(90)(182)
Corporate expense(119)(101)(82)
Operating income$919 $748 $626 
Loss on debt redemption(2)(146)(64)
Interest expense, net(229)(259)(317)
Other expense, net (V)
(82)(19)(74)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes$606 $324 $171 
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Total segment operating profit$2,015
 $1,586
 $1,689
Unallocated amounts:     
Impairment of goodwill
 
 (719)
Restructuring and other charges(620) (9) (165)
Corporate expense(360) (252) (325)
Consolidated operating income$1,035
 $1,325
 $480
Interest expense(338) (378) (496)
Other (expense) income, net(122) (79) 486
Consolidated income before income taxes$575
 $868
 $470

December 31,20222021
Assets:
Total segment assets$9,419 $9,262 
Unallocated amounts:
Cash and cash equivalents791 720 
Deferred income taxes54 184 
Corporate fixed assets, net91 133 
Fair value of derivative contracts
Accounts receivable securitization(250)(250)
Other144 168 
Consolidated assets$10,255 $10,219 
December 31,2019 2018
Assets:   
Total segment assets$14,941
 $15,339
Unallocated amounts:   
Cash and cash equivalents1,648
 2,277
Deferred income taxes608
 573
Corporate fixed assets, net326
 334
Fair value of derivative contracts6
 37
Other49
 133
Consolidated assets$17,578
 $18,693
Segment assets include third-party receivables while the accounts receivable securitization item includes the impact of sold receivables under the Company's Accounts Receivable securitization programs. See Note M for further details.
52

Sales by major product grouping were as follows:

For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Sales:     
Innovative flat-rolled products$5,471
 $5,604
 $5,000
Engine products3,452
 3,220
 2,965
Fastening systems1,561
 1,531
 1,484
Engineered structures1,123
 1,081
 1,023
Architectural aluminum systems1,118
 1,135
 1,069
Forged wheels969
 966
 828
Aluminum extrusions493
 484
 471
Other5
 (7) 120
 $14,192
 $14,014
 $12,960

Table of Contents

Geographic information for sales was as follows (based upon the country wheredestination of the point of sale occurred)sale):
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Sales:     
United States$9,548
 $9,137
 $8,167
France864
 936
 965
United Kingdom732
 737
 721
Hungary719
 823
 739
China630
 632
 615
Russia511
 553
 500
Germany322
 302
 309
Canada313
 285
 261
Japan190
 170
 141
Brazil159
 214
 285
Other204
 225
 257
 $14,192
 $14,014
 $12,960

For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Sales:
United States$2,928 $2,542 $2,782 
France394 330 327 
Japan319 319 388 
Germany292 257 309 
Mexico235 225 185 
United Kingdom228 213 231 
Italy180 181 181 
Canada138 127 119 
China111 71 75 
Poland96 77 76 
Other742 630 586 
$5,663 $4,972 $5,259 
Geographic information for long-lived tangible assets was as follows (based upon the physical location of the assets):
December 31,20222021
Long-lived assets:
United States$1,793 $1,868 
Hungary193 205 
France114 127 
United Kingdom107 116 
Germany58 66 
Mexico58 61 
China46 53 
Other74 79 
 $2,443 $2,575 
December 31,2019 2018
Long-lived assets:   
United States$4,193
 $4,148
China338
 326
Hungary302
 257
Russia233
 253
United Kingdom189
 253
France185
 163
Germany86
 84
Canada57
 61
Mexico57
 45
Brazil5
 54
Other69
 60
 $5,714
 $5,704
53


The following table disaggregates segment revenue by major end market served. Differences between total segment totals and consolidated Arconictotals are in Corporate. In 2018, Corporate included $38
Engine ProductsFastening SystemsEngineered StructuresForged WheelsTotal
Segment
Year ended December 31, 2022
Aerospace - Commercial$1,495 $616 $495 $— $2,606 
Aerospace - Defense526 158 239 — 923 
Commercial Transportation— 225 — 1,058 1,283 
Industrial and Other677 118 56 — 851 
Total end-market revenue$2,698 $1,117 $790 $1,058 $5,663 
Year ended December 31, 2021
Aerospace - Commercial$1,105 $537 $387 $— $2,029 
Aerospace - Defense523 158 270 — 951 
Commercial Transportation— 208 — 921 1,129 
Industrial and Other654 141 68 — 863 
Total end-market revenue$2,282 $1,044 $725 $921 $4,972 
Year ended December 31, 2020
Aerospace - Commercial$1,247 $808 $542 $— $2,597 
Aerospace - Defense557 156 303 — 1,016 
Commercial Transportation— 155 — 679 834 
Industrial and Other602 126 82 — 810 
Total end-market revenue$2,406 $1,245 $927 $679 $5,257 
The Company derived 62%, 60%, and 69% of costs related to settlementsits revenue for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, from aerospace (commercial and defense) markets.
General Electric Company and Raytheon Technologies Corporation represented approximately 12% and 9%, respectively, of certain customer claimsthe Company’s third-party sales for the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily related to product introductions.from the Engine Products segment.
For the year ended December 31,
Engineered
Products and
Forgings
 
Global Rolled
Products
 
Total
Segment
2019     
Aerospace$5,075
 $1,251
 $6,326
Transportation1,289
 2,418
 3,707
Building and construction
 1,300
 1,300
Industrial and Other741
 2,113
 2,854
Total end-market revenue$7,105
 $7,082
 $14,187
      
2018




Aerospace$4,722
 $1,116
 $5,838
Transportation1,302
 2,550
 3,852
Building and construction
 1,357
 1,357
Industrial and Other774
 2,200
 2,974
Total end-market revenue$6,798
 $7,223
 $14,021
      
2017     
Aerospace$4,347
 $1,109
 $5,456
Transportation1,098
 2,072
 3,170
Building and construction
 1,269
 1,269
Industrial and Other855
 2,090
 2,945
Total end-market revenue$6,300
 $6,540
 $12,840

C.E. Restructuring and Other Charges
Restructuring and other charges for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019 were comprised of the following:
 2019 2018 2017
Non-cash asset impairments$570
 $13
 $58
Layoff costs103
 20
 64
Pension and Other postretirement benefits - net settlement and curtailment charges(49) 91
 
Net (gain) loss on divestitures of assets and businesses (S)
(20) (109) 57
Other26
 13
 (3)
Reversals of previously recorded layoff costs(10) (19) (11)
Restructuring and other charges$620
 $9
 $165

For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Layoff costs$— $$113 
Net reversals of previously recorded layoff reserves(1)(3)(21)
Pension, other post-retirement benefits and deferred compensation - net settlement and curtailments58 75 69 
Non-cash asset impairments and accelerated depreciation15 
Net (gain) loss related to divestitures of assets and businesses (U)
(8)(8)
Other
Restructuring and other charges$56 $90 $182 
Layoff costs were recorded based on approved detailed action plans submitted by the operating locations that specified positions to be eliminated, benefits to be paid under existing severance plans, union contracts or statutory requirements and the expected timetable for completion of the plans.
2019 Actions2022 Actions.. In 2019, Arconic2022, Howmet recorded Restructuring and other charges of $620 ($512 after-tax), this$56, which included a non-cash$58 charge for asset impairments of $570 ($477 after-tax), primarily comprised of $428 ($345 after-tax)U.S. and U.K. pension plans' settlement accounting; a $6 charge for impairment of the Disks long-lived asset group, a charge of $112 ($109 after-tax) for impairment of assets associated with agreements to sell the Company’s Brazilian rolling mill operations ($53), the U.K. forgings business ($46),various other exit costs, and a small additive business ($13), a$1 charge of $25 ($19 after-tax) for impairment of a trade name intangible asset and properties, plant, and equipmentaccelerated depreciation primarily related to the Company’s primary research and developmentclosure of small U.S. manufacturing facilities in Engineered Structures. These charges were partially offset by a gain of $8 on the sale of assets at a small U.S. manufacturing facility in Engine Products and a chargebenefit of $5 ($4 after-tax) for an impairment$1 related to the reversal of a cost method investmentnumber of layoff reserves related to prior periods.
54


2021 Actions.In 2021, Howmet recorded Restructuring and other charges of $90, which included a $75 charge for U.K. and U.S. pension plans' settlement accounting; a $15 charge for accelerated depreciation primarily related to the GRP segment;closure of small U.S. manufacturing facilities in Engine Products and Fastening Systems; a $7 charge of $103 ($78 after-tax) for layoff costs, including the separation of approximately

1,310253 employees (484(171 in the GRP segment, 460Engineered Structures, 75 in Corporate,Engine Products, 6 in Fastening Systems and 3661 in the EP&F segment)Corporate); a $4 charge for impairment of $26 ($21 after-tax) for other miscellaneous items including lease terminations of $12 primarily relatedassets associated with an agreement to sell a corporate aircraft, accelerated depreciation of $9, a net charge of $2 for executive severance net of the benefit of forfeited executive stock compensation,small manufacturing business in France, and a $4 charge for various other exit costs of $4; and a charge of $9 ($7 after-tax) for pension settlement accounting.costs. These charges were partially offset by a benefit of $58 ($45 after-tax) from the elimination of the life insurance benefit for the U.S. salaried and non-bargaining hourly retirees of the Company and its subsidiaries; a benefit of $10 ($9 after-tax) from the reversal of a number of current year layoff reserves; and a gain of $20 ($17 after-tax) for contingent consideration received from the Texarkana sale.
As of December 31, 2019, approximately 947 of the 1,310 employees were separated. The remaining separations for the 2019 restructuring programs are expected to be completed in 2020. In 2019, cash payments of $65 were made against layoff reserves related to 2019 restructuring programs.
2018 Actions. In 2018, Arconic recorded Restructuring and other charges of $9 ($9 after-tax), which included a net gain$12 on the sale of several assets and businesses of $109 ($81 after-tax), primarily made up ofat a gain on the asset sale of Texarkana of $154 ($119 after-tax) and loss on the sale of the Hungary forgings business of $43 ($39 after-tax) (see note S); charges of $96 ($75 after-tax) for pension settlement and $23 ($18 after-tax) for pension curtailment; a postretirement curtailment benefit of $28 ($22 after-tax) (see note F); and a charge of $20 ($17 after-tax) for layoff costs, including the separation of approximately 125 employees (89 in the EP&F segment and 36 in Corporate); a charge of $12 ($9 after-tax) for contract termination costs and asset impairments associated with the shutdown of asmall U.S. manufacturing facility in Acuna, Mexico; a charge of $6 ($4 after-tax) for contract termination costs related to the New York office; a charge of $8 ($4 after-tax) for other miscellaneous items including accelerated depreciation and asset impairments;Fastening Systems and a benefit of $19 ($15 after-tax) for$3 related to the reversal of a number of layoff reserves related to prior periods.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, 80 of the 253 employees were separated. The remaining separations associated withfor the 20182021 restructuring programs were essentially complete. In 2019 and 2018, cash payments of $4 and $9, respectively, were made against layoff reserves relatedare expected to the 2018 restructuring programs.be completed in 2023 with certain final payouts expected to occur in 2024.
2017 Actions2020 Actions.. In 2017, Arconic2020, Howmet recorded Restructuring and other charges of $165 ($143 after-tax),$182, which were comprised of the following components:included a $113 charge of $69 ($47 after-tax) for layoff costs, related to cost reduction initiatives including the separation of approximately 8804,301 employees (403(1,706 in the EP&F segment, 336Engine Products, 1,675 in the GRP segment,Fastening Systems, 805 in Engineered Structures, 92 in Forged Wheels and 14123 in Corporate),; a $69 net charge for Pension, Other postretirement benefits and deferred compensation - net settlement and curtailments, composed of $60 ($60 after-tax)a $74 charge for U.K. and U.S. pension plans' settlement accounting offset by a $3 benefit from the termination of a deferred compensation plan and a $2 curtailment benefit related to a postretirement plan; a $5 post-closing adjustment related to the sale of the Italy rolling mill;Company’s U.K. forgings business (which was formerly part of the Engine Products segment); a $5 charge of $41 ($41 after-tax) for the impairment of assets associated with an agreement to sell an aerospace components business in the U.K. (within the Engineered Structures segment), which ultimately did not occur and the business was returned to held for use; $5 charge related to the impairment of a cost method investment; a $2 charge for accelerated depreciation; a $1 charge for impairment of assets due to a facility sale, of the Latin America extrusions business (see Note S);and a net benefit of $6 ($4 after-tax)charge for the reversal of forfeited executive stock compensation of $13,various other exit costs. These charges were partially offset by a charge of $7 for the related severance; a net charge of $12 ($7 after-tax) for other miscellaneous items; and a benefit of $11 ($8 after-tax) for$21 related to the reversal of a number of small layoff reserves related to prior periods.period programs and a gain of $3 on the sale of assets.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, the employee separations associated with the 20172020 restructuring programs were essentially complete. In 2019, 2018, and 2017, cash payments of $5, $34, and $28, respectively, were made against layoff reserves related to the 2017 restructuring programs.complete.

Activity and reserve balances for restructuring charges were as follows:
Layoff
costs
Other
exit costs
Total
Reserve balances at December 31, 2019$13 $— $13 
2020 Activity
Cash payments(51)— (51)
Restructuring and other charges161 21 182 
Other(1)
(69)(21)(90)
Reserve balances at December 31, 2020$54 $— $54 
2021 Activity
Cash payments$(41)$(2)$(43)
Restructuring and other charges79 11 90 
Other(2)
(75)(7)(82)
Reserve balances at December 31, 2021$17 $$19 
2022 Activity
Cash payments$(9)$(7)$(16)
Restructuring and other charges56 — 56 
Other(3)
(58)(51)
Reserve balances at December 31, 2022$$$
 
Layoff
costs
 
Other
exit costs
 Total
Reserve balances at December 31, 2016$50
 $9
 $59
2017     
Cash payments(59) (6) (65)
Restructuring charges64
 1
 65
Other(1)
1
 (2) (1)
Reserve balances at December 31, 2017$56
 $2
 $58
2018     
Cash payments$(47) $(2) $(49)
Restructuring charges111
 13
 124
Other(2)
(110) 2
 (108)
Reserve balances at December 31, 2018$10
 $15
 $25
2019     
Cash payments$(74) $(5) $(79)
Restructuring charges56
 574
 630
Other(3)
39
 (581) (542)
Reserve balances at December 31, 2019$31
 $3
 $34
(1)(1)
In 2017, Other for layoff costs included a reclassification of a stock awards reversal of $13, offset by reversals of previously recorded restructuring charges of $11 and foreign currency translation of $1.
(2)
In 2018, Other for layoff costs included reclassifications of $119 in pension costs and a $28 credit in postretirement benefits, as the impacts were reflected in Arconic's separate liabilities for Accrued pension benefits and Accrued postretirement benefits, and reversals of previously recorded restructuring charges of $19.
(3)
In 2019, Other for layoff costs included reclassifications of a $58 credit for elimination of life insurance benefits for U.S. salaried and non-bargaining hourly retirees, a charge of $9 for pension plan settlement accounting, as the impacts were reflected in Arconic's separate liabilities for Accrued pension benefits and Accrued postretirement benefits, and reversals of previously recorded restructuring charges of $10.
In 2019, Other2020, other for layoff costs included $74 in settlement accounting charges related to U.K. and U.S. pension plans, offset by a $3 benefit from the termination of a deferred compensation plan and a $2 curtailment benefit related to a postretirement plan; while other for other exit costs included a charge of $428$5 for impairment of the Disks long-lived asset group;assets; a charge of $112 for impairment of assets associated with agreement to sell the Company’s Brazilian rolling mill operations, the U.K. forgings business, and a small additive business; a charge of $25 for impairment of properties, plants, and equipment$5 post-closing adjustment related to the Company’s primary research and development facility andsale of a trade name intangible asset;business; a $5 charge of $12 for lease terminations; a charge of $9 for accelerated depreciation as the impacts were primarily reflected in various noncurrent asset accounts; a charge of $5 related to the impairment of a cost method investmentinvestment; a $2 charge for accelerated depreciation; a $1 charge for impairment of GRP,assets due to a facility closure and a $6 charge of $1 related tofor various other miscellaneous items; partiallyexit costs, which were offset by a gain of $20$3 on the sale of assets.
55


(2)In 2021, other for layoff costs included $75 in settlement accounting charges related to contingent consideration from the Texarkana sale. Additionally, Other included the reclassification of $9 in leaseU.K. and U.S. pension plans; while other for other exit costs included a charge of $15 for accelerated depreciation and a $4 charge for various other exit costs, which were offset by a gain of $12 on the sale of assets.
(3)In 2022, other for layoff costs included $58 in settlement accounting charges related to reduce right-of-useU.S. and U.K. pension plans; while other for other exit costs included a gain of $8 on the sale of assets, within Other noncurrent assets in accordance with the new lease accounting standard.which was offset by a $1 charge for accelerated depreciation.
The remaining reserves at December 31, 2022 are expected to be paid in cash during 2020.2023 and 2024.

D.F. Interest Cost Components
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Amount charged to interest expense, net$229 $259 $317 
Loss on debt redemption (R)
146 64 
Amount capitalized11 
 Total$237 $413 $392 
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Amount charged to expense$338
 $378
 $496
Amount capitalized33
 23
 22
 $371
 $401
 $518

E.G. Other Expense, (Income), Net
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Non-service related net periodic benefit cost$116
 $112
 $154
Interest income(25) (23) (19)
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net(1) 26
 (5)
Net loss (gain) from asset sales7
 10
 (513)
Other, net25
 (46) (103)
 $122
 $79
 $(486)

For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Non-service costs - pension and other postretirement benefits (H)
$16 $$26 
Interest income(6)(2)(5)
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net(1)(11)
Net realized and unrealized losses18 
Deferred compensation(8)10 
Judgment from legal proceeding (V)
65 — — 
Other, net(1)
(2)(7)46 
Total$82 $19 $74 
(1)In 2019, Other, net included an increase in deferred compensation arrangements and related investment performance. In 2018, Non-service related net periodic benefit cost included lower net actuarial losses as a result of pension actions taken during 2018 (see Note F) and2020, Other, net included a benefitcharge from establishingthe write-off of a tax indemnification receivable of $29$53 reflecting the aggregate of Alcoa Corporation’s 49% share and Arconic Corporation's 33.66% share of a Spanish tax reserve (see Note VT). In 2017, Net loss (gain) from asset salesincluded a gain on the sale of a portion of Arconic’s investment in Alcoa Corporation common stock of $351 (see Note U) and a gain of $167 on the Debt-for-Equity Exchange (see Note U). In 2017, Other, net included an adjustment of $81 to the contingent earn-out liability related to the 2014 acquisition of Firth Rixson (see Note S) and an adjustment of $25 associated with a separation-related guarantee liability (see Note T).
F.H. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
ArconicHowmet maintains pension plans covering most U.S. employees and certain employees in foreign locations. PensionDefined pension benefits generally depend on length of service and job grade. Substantially all benefits are paid through pension trusts that are sufficiently funded to ensure that all plans can pay benefits to retirees as they become due. Most salaried and non-bargaining hourly U.S. employees hired after March 1, 2006, participate in a defined contribution plan instead of a defined benefit plan.
ArconicHowmet also maintains health care and life insurance postretirement benefit plans covering eligible U.S. retired employees and certain retirees from foreign locations.employees. Generally, the medical plans are unfunded and pay a percentage of medical expenses, reduced by deductibles and other coverage. Life benefits are generally provided by insurance contracts. ArconicHowmet retains the right, subject to existing agreements, to change or eliminate these benefits. AllEffective May 1, 2019, salaried and certain non-bargaining hourly U.S. employees hired after January 1, 2002 and certain bargaining hourly U.S. employees hired after July 1, 2010,retirees are not eligible for postretirement health carelife insurance benefits. All salariedSalaried and certainnon-bargaining hourly U.S. employees that retire on or after AprilJanuary 1, 20082022 are not eligible for any postretirement life insurancemedical benefits.
Effective January 1, 2015, Arconic no longer offers postretirement health care benefits to Medicare-eligible, primarily non-bargaining, U.S. retirees through Company-sponsored plans. Qualifying retirees (hired prior to January 1, 2002), both current and future, may access these benefits in the marketplace by purchasing coverage directly from insurance carriers.
On April 1, 2018, benefit accruals for future service and compensation under all of the Company's qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans for U.S. salaried Certain previously retired salary and non-bargaining hourly U.S. employees ceased. Asremain eligible for Medicare Part B reimbursement.
In 2022, a result of this change,certain U.S. pension plan attained funding levels that allowed full lump sum payments. These payments resulted in 2018, the Company recorded a decrease to the Accrued pension benefit liability of $136 related to the reduction of future benefits ($141 offset in Accumulated other comprehensive loss) and curtailmentsettlement charges of $5 in Restructuring and other charges.
On April 13, 2018, the United Auto Workers ratified a new five-year labor agreement, covering approximately 1,300 U.S. employees of Arconic, which expires on March 31, 2023. A provision within the agreement includes a retirement benefit increase for future retirees$41 that participate in a defined benefit pension plan, which impacts approximately 300 of those employees. In addition, effective January 1, 2019, benefit accruals for future service ceased. As result of these changes, in 2018, a curtailment charge of $9 waswere recorded in Restructuring and other charges.
In 2018,charges in the Statement of Consolidated Operations. Additionally, in 2022, 2021, and 2020, the Company announcedapplied settlement accounting to other U.S. and U.K. pension plans due to lump sum payments to participants, which resulted in settlement charges of $17, $12, and $8, respectively, that effective December 31, 2018, it would end all pre-Medicare medical, prescription drug and vision coverage for current and future salaried and non-bargained hourly employees and retirees of the Company and its

subsidiaries. As a result of this change, in 2018, the Companywere recorded a decrease to the Accrued other postretirement benefits liability of $32 related to the reduction of future benefits, $4 offset in Accumulated other comprehensive loss, and a curtailment benefit of $28 in Restructuring and other charges.

56


In 2018,December 2022, the company communicatedCanadian pension plan was amended to plan participants that effectiveprovide for termination of the plan. As a result, the Company recognized a reduction of $2 in the first quarter of 2019,pension benefit accruals for future service and compensation for employees in the United Kingdom defined benefit pension plans will cease. The planobligation through curtailment, resulted in a $13 decrease in the Accrued pension benefits liability which was offset in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. Additionally, on October 29, 2018,loss in the United Kingdom High Court ruled that defined benefitConsolidated Balance Sheet. The wind-up efforts and satisfaction of all plan liabilities are expected to be completed in 2023.
In 2021 and 2020, the Company undertook a number of actions to reduce pension obligations in the U.K. by offering lump sum payments to certain plan participants and entering into group annuity contracts with a third-party carrier to pay and administer future annuity payments. The Company applied settlement accounting to these U.K. pension plans, offering Guaranteed Minimum Pensions must review benefits accrued between May 1990 to April 1997 to ensure gender pay equality. The reviewwhich resulted in an increase to the Accrued pension benefits liabilitysettlement charges of $9$23 and a corresponding curtailment charge that was$66, respectively, that were recorded in Restructuring and other charges.charges in the Statement of Consolidated Operations. These actions reduced the number of pension plan participants in the U.K. by approximately 70%.
In 2019,2020, the Company communicated to plan participants that for its U.S. salaried and non-bargained hourly retirees of the Company and its subsidiaries, it would eliminate the life insurance benefit effective May 1, 2019, and certain health care subsidies effective December 31, 2019.2021, and that for certain bargained retirees of the Company, it would eliminate certain health care subsidies effective December 31, 2021 and the life insurance benefit effective August 1, 2020. As a result of these changes, in 2019,amendments, the Company recorded a decrease to the Accrued other postretirement benefits liability of $75,$6 in 2020, which was offset by a curtailment benefit of $58 in Restructuring and other charges and $17 in Accumulated other comprehensive loss.
In June 2019,the first quarter of 2021, the Company and the United Steelworkers (USW) reachedannounced a tentative three-year labor agreement that was ratified onplan administration change of certain of its Medicare-eligible prescription drug benefits to an Employer Group Waiver Plan with a wrap-around secondary plan effective July 11, 2019 covering approximately 3,400 employees at four U.S. locations; the previous labor agreement expired on May 15, 2019.  In 2019,1, 2021. The administration change is expected to reduce costs to the Company recognized $9through the usage of Medicare Part D and drug manufacturer subsidies. Due to this amendment, along with the associated plan remeasurements, the Company recorded a decrease to its Accrued other postretirement benefits liability of $39, which was offset in Cost of goods sold on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations primarily for a one-time signing bonus for employees. Additionally, on July 25, 2019, the USW ratified a new four-year labor agreement covering approximately 560 employees at the Company’s Niles, Ohio facility. The prior labor agreement expired on June 30, 2018.Accumulated other comprehensive loss.
In 2019 and 2018,October 2021, the Company applied settlement accountingundertook additional actions to U.S.reduce gross pension plans dueobligations by $125 by purchasing group annuity contracts with a third-party carrier to lump sum payments to participants whichpay and administer future annuity payments. These actions resulted in a settlement chargescharge of $9$34 and $96 that were recorded in Restructuring and other charges.

charges in the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2021 in the Statement of Consolidated Operations. The funded status of allthe plans have not been significantly impacted.

57


Obligations and Funded Status
 Pension benefitsOther
postretirement benefits
December 31,2022202120222021
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$2,296 $2,713 $165 $215 
Service cost
Interest cost51 47 
Amendments— — (31)
Actuarial gains(1)
(553)(55)(38)(10)
Settlements(72)(275)— — 
Curtailments(2)— — — 
Benefits paid(102)(140)(13)(17)
Medicare Part D subsidy receipts— — — 
Foreign currency translation impact(23)(1)— — 
Benefit obligation at end of year(2)
$1,599 $2,296 $120 $165 
Change in plan assets(2)
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$1,531 $1,724 $— $— 
Actual (loss) return on plan assets(383)124 — — 
Employer contributions43 96 — — 
Benefits paid(87)(123)— — 
Administrative expenses(12)(12)— — 
Settlement payments(98)(277)— — 
Foreign currency translation impact(24)(1)— — 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year(2)
$970 $1,531 $— $— 
Funded status$(629)$(765)$(120)$(165)
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet consist of:
Noncurrent assets$20 $22 $— $— 
Current liabilities(16)(16)(11)(12)
Noncurrent liabilities(633)(771)(109)(153)
Net amount recognized$(629)$(765)$(120)$(165)
Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss consist of:
Net actuarial loss (gain)$907 $1,067 $(28)$11 
Prior service cost (benefit)(40)(49)
Net amount recognized, before tax effect$909 $1,070 $(68)$(38)
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss consist of:
Net actuarial benefit$(53)$(81)$(38)$(10)
Amortization of accumulated net actuarial loss(107)(125)(1)— 
Prior service (benefit) cost(1)— (31)
Amortization of prior service (cost) benefit— (7)
Net amount recognized, before tax effect$(161)$(210)$(30)$(32)
 Pension benefits 
Other
postretirement benefits
December 31,2019 2018 2019 2018
Change in benefit obligation       
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$6,476
 $7,359
 $806
 $927
Service cost25
 46
 7
 7
Interest cost235
 219
 28
 28
Amendments
 18
 (78) (25)
Actuarial losses (gains)974
 (372) 100
 (51)
Settlements(23) (146) 
 
Curtailments
 (154) 
 
Benefits paid(477) (422) (82) (86)
Medicare Part D subsidy receipts
 
 5
 6
Foreign currency translation impact39
 (72) 
 
Benefit obligation at end of year(1)
$7,249
 $6,476
 $786
 $806
Change in plan assets(1)
       
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$4,334
 $4,862
 $
 $
Actual return on plan assets731
 (144) 
 
Employer contributions268
 298
 
 
Benefits paid(453) (397) 
 
Administrative expenses(34) (33) 
 
Settlements(22) (178) 
 
Foreign currency translation impact44
 (74) 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year(1)
$4,868
 $4,334
 $
 $
Net funded status$(2,381) $(2,142) $(786) $(806)
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet consist of:       
Noncurrent assets$104
 $111
 $
 $
Current liabilities(25) (23) (72) (83)
Noncurrent liabilities(2,460) (2,230) (714) (723)
Net amount recognized$(2,381) $(2,142) $(786) $(806)
Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss consist of:       
Net actuarial loss$3,375
 $2,957
 $179
 $87
Prior service cost (benefit)1
 3
 (37) (27)
Net amount recognized, before tax effect$3,376
 $2,960
 $142
 $60
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss consist of:       
Net actuarial loss (gain)$566
 $(19) $100
 $(52)
Amortization of accumulated net actuarial loss(148) (264) (8) (7)
Prior service cost (benefit)
 19
 (78) (25)
Amortization of prior service (cost) benefit(2) (26) 68
 35
Net amount recognized, before tax effect$416
 $(290) $82
 $(49)
(1)At December 31, 2022, the actuarial gains impacting the benefit obligation were primarily due to changes in the discount rate as well as the alternative interest cost method, and other changes including census data.
(2)At December 31, 2022, the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, and funded status for U.S. pension plans were $1,459, $833, and $(626), respectively. At December 31, 2021, the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, and funded status for U.S. pension plans were $2,039, $1,278, and $(761), respectively.
58



(1)
At December 31, 2019, the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, and funded status for U.S. pension plans were $5,884, $3,513, and $(2,371), respectively. At December 31, 2018, the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, and funded status for U.S. pension plans were $5,282, $3,123, and $(2,159) respectively.
Pension Plan Benefit Obligations
 Pension benefits
  20222021
The projected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans were as follows:
Projected benefit obligation$1,599 $2,296 
Accumulated benefit obligation1,598 2,293 
The aggregate projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were as follows:
Projected benefit obligation1,482 1,982 
Fair value of plan assets833 1,193 
The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were as follows:
Accumulated benefit obligation1,481 1,981 
Fair value of plan assets833 1,193 
 Pension benefits
  
2019 2018
The projected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans were as follows:   
Projected benefit obligation$7,249
 $6,476
Accumulated benefit obligation7,219
 6,444
The aggregate projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets was as follows:   
Projected benefit obligation6,064
 5,435
Fair value of plan assets3,579
 3,182
The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets was as follows:   
Accumulated benefit obligation6,045
 5,415
Fair value of plan assets3,579
 3,179

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
 
Pension benefits(1)
Other postretirement benefits(2)
For the year ended December 31,202220212020202220212020
Service cost$$$12 $$$
Interest cost51 47 97 10 
Expected return on plan assets(80)(90)(136)— — — 
Recognized net actuarial loss49 56 78 — 
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)— — (9)(9)(6)
Settlements(3)
58 69 76 — — — 
Curtailments(4)
— — — — (2)
Net periodic benefit cost(5)
$82 $93 $127 $(2)$(2)$
Discontinued operations— — 20 — — 
Net amount recognized in Statement of Consolidated Operations$82 $93 $107 $(2)$(2)$
 
Pension benefits(1)
 
Other postretirement benefits(2)
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Service cost$25
 $46
 $90
 $7
 $7
 $7
Interest cost235
 219
 234
 28
 28
 30
Expected return on plan assets(286) (306) (332) 
 
 
Recognized net actuarial loss139
 168
 220
 4
 7
 5
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)2
 3
 5
 (6) (7) (8)
Settlements(3)
9
 96
 
 
 
 
Curtailments(4)

 23
 
 (58) (28) 
Net periodic benefit cost(5)
$124
 $249
 $217
 $(25) $7
 $34

(1)
In 2022, 2021, and 2020, net periodic benefit cost for U.S. pension plans was $79, $61, and $58, respectively.
(1)
In 2019, 2018 and 2017, net periodic benefit cost for U.S. pension plans was $127, $239, and $206, respectively.
(2)
In 2019, 2018 and 2017, net periodic benefit cost for other postretirement benefits reflects a reduction of $11, $10, and $11,
(2)In 2021 and 2020, net periodic benefit cost for other postretirement benefits reflects a reduction of less than $1 and $1, respectively, related to the recognition of the federal subsidy awarded under Medicare Part D.
(3)
In 2019 and 2018, settlements were due to workforce reductions (see Note C) and the payment of lump sum benefits.
(4)
In 2019 and 2018, curtailments were due to a reduction of future benefits, resulting in the recognition of favorable and unfavorable plan amendments.
(5)
Service cost was included within Cost of goods sold, Selling, general administrative, and other expenses, and Research and development expenses; curtailments and settlements were included in Restructuring and other charges; and all other cost components were recorded in Other expense (income), netin the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
Amounts Expected to be Recognizedthe recognition of the federal subsidy awarded under Medicare Part D.
(3)In 2022, settlements were related to U.S. and U.K. lump sum benefit payments. In 2021, settlements were related to U.S. and U.K. actions including the purchase of group annuity contracts and lump sum benefit payments. In 2020, settlements were related to U.K. actions including lump sum benefit payments and the purchase of group annuity contracts as well as U.S. lump sum benefit payments. See Note E for further details.
(4)In 2021, the curtailment was due to plan termination. In 2020, the curtailment was due to workforce reductions.
(5)Service cost was included within Cost of goods sold, Selling, general administrative, and other expenses; curtailments and settlements were included in Net Periodic Benefit CostRestructuring and other charges; and all other cost components were recorded in Other expense, netin the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
 Pension benefits Other postretirement benefits
December 31,2020 2020
Net actuarial loss recognition$176
 $8
Prior service cost (benefit) recognition
 (7)


59


Assumptions
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations for U.S. pension and other postretirement benefit plans were as follows (assumptions for non-U.S. plans did not differ materially):follows:
December 31,20222021
Discount rate5.40 %2.70 %
Cash balance plan interest crediting rate3.00 %3.00 %
December 31,2019 2018
Discount rate3.30% 4.35%
Rate of compensation increase
 3.50
Cash balance plan interest crediting rate3.00
 3.00

The U.S. discount rate is determined using a Company-specific yield curve model (above-median) developed with the assistance of an external actuary, while both the U.K. and Canada utilize models developed internally by their respective actuary. The cash flows of the plans’ projected benefit obligations are discounted using a single equivalent rate derived from yields on high quality corporate bonds, which represent a broad diversification of issuers in various sectors, including finance and banking, industrials, transportation, and utilities, among others. The yield curve model parallelsmodels parallel the plans’ projected cash flows, which have ana global average duration of of 10 years. The underlying cash flows of the bonds included in the modelmodels exceed the cash flows needed to satisfy the Company’s plans’ obligations multiple times.
Benefit accruals for future compensation under the Company’s major salaried and non-bargained hourly defined benefit pension plans have ceased. The rate of compensation increase no longer impacts the determination of the benefit obligation and is not reported in the preceding table effective December 31, 2019.obligation.
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for U.S. pension and other postretirement benefit plans were as follows (assumptionsfollows:
202220212020
Discount rate to calculate service cost(1)
2.80 %2.80 %3.30 %
Discount rate to calculate interest cost(1)
2.50 %2.10 %2.70 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets6.70 %6.20 %6.00 %
Cash balance plan interest crediting rate3.00 %3.00 %3.00 %
(1)In all periods presented, the respective global discount rates were used to determine net periodic benefit cost for non-U.S.most pension plans didfor the full annual period. The discount rates for certain plans were updated during 2022, 2021, and 2020 to reflect the remeasurement of these plans due to settlements and/or curtailments. The weighted-average rates reflecting these remeasurements does not significantly differ materially):
 2019 2018 2017
Discount rate to calculate service cost(1)
4.35% 3.75% 4.20%
Discount rate to calculate interest cost(1)
4.00
 3.30
 3.60
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets7.00
 7.00
 7.75
Rate of compensation increase3.50
 3.50
 3.50
Cash balance plan interest crediting rate3.00
 3.00
 3.00
(1)from the rates presented.
In all periods presented, the respective discount rates were used to determine net periodic benefit cost for most U.S. pension plans for the full annual period. However, the discount rates for a limited number of plans were updated during 2019, 2018, and 2017 to reflect the remeasurement of these plans due to new union labor agreements, settlements, and/or curtailments. The updated discount rates used were not significantly different from the discount rates presented.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets (“EROA”) is generally applied to a five-year market-related value of plan assets (a fair value at the plan measurement date is used for certain non-U.S. plans).assets. The process used by management to develop this assumption is one that relies on a combination of historical asset return information and forward-looking returns by asset class. As it relates to historical asset return information, management focuses on various historical moving averages when developing this assumption. While consideration is given to recent performance and historical returns, the assumption represents a long-term, prospective return. Management also incorporates expected future returns on current and planned asset allocations using information from various external investment managers and consultants, as well as management’s own judgment.
For 2019, 2018,2023, management anticipates that approximately 7% will continue to be the expected long-term rate of return for global plan assets. EROA assumptions are developed by country. Annual changes in the weighted average EROA are impacted by the relative size of the assets by country.
For 2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, the U.S. expected long-term rate of return used by management was based on the prevailing and planned strategic asset allocations, as well as estimates of future returns by asset class. These rates fellwere within the respective range of the 20-year moving average of actual performance and the expected future return developed by asset class. In 2018, management reduced the expected long-term rate of return by 75 basis points due to a decrease in the expected return by asset class and the 20-year moving average. For 2020, management anticipates that 7.00% will be the expected long-term rate of return.
Assumed health care cost trend rates for U.S. other postretirement benefit plans were as follows (assumptions for non-U.S. plans did not differ materially):
 2019 2018 2017
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year5.50% 5.50% 5.50%
Rate to which the cost trend rate gradually declines4.50
 4.50
 4.50
Year that the rate reaches the rate at which it is assumed to remain2023
 2022
 2021

follows:

202220212020
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year5.50 %5.50 %5.50 %
Rate to which the cost trend rate gradually declines4.50 %4.50 %4.50 %
Year that the rate reaches the rate at which it is assumed to remain202520242023
The assumed health care cost trend rate is used to measure the expected cost of gross eligible charges covered by Arconic’sHowmet’s other postretirement benefit plans. For 2020,2023, a 5.5%5.50% trend rate will be used, reflecting management’s best estimate of the change in future health care costs covered by the plans. The plans’ actual annual health care cost trend experience over the past three years has ranged from (3.8)%1.80% to 0.7%11.30%. Management does not believe this three-year range is indicative of expected increases for future health care costs over the long-term.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have an effect on the amounts reported for the health care plan. A one-percentage point change in these assumed rates would have the following effects:
60
 1% increase 1% decrease
Effect on other postretirement benefit obligations$23
 $(22)
Effect on total of service and interest cost components1
 (1)


Plan Assets
Arconic’sHowmet’s pension plans’ investment policy and weighted average asset allocations at December 31, 2019 and 2018,2022 by asset class, were as follows:
Asset class
Policy range(1)
Equities20–55%
Fixed income25–55%
Other investments15–35%
  
Plan assets
at
December 31,
Asset classPolicy range2019 2018
Equities20–55%31% 29%
Fixed income25–55%50
 48
Other investments15–35%19
 23
Total 100% 100%

(1)
Policy range is for U.S. plan assets only, as both the U.K. and Canadian asset investment allocations are controlled by a third-party trustee with input from Howmet.
The principal objectives underlying the investment of the pension plans’ assets are to ensure that ArconicHowmet can properly fund benefit obligations as they become due under a broad range of potential economic and financial scenarios, maximize the long-term investment return with an acceptable level of risk based on such obligations, and broadly diversify investments across and within various asset classes to protect asset values against adverse movements. Specific objectives for long-term investment strategy include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to pension liabilities, and achieving diversification across the balance of the asset portfolio.attaining and maintaining a sufficiently funded status. The use of derivative instruments is permitted where appropriate and necessary for achieving overall investment policy objectives. The investment strategy uses long duration cash bonds and derivative instruments to offset a portion of the interest rate sensitivity of U.S. pension liabilities. Exposure to broad equity risk is decreased and diversified through investments in discretionary and systematic macro hedge funds, long/shortprivate equity, hedge funds, high yieldprivate credit, private real estate, high-yield bonds, global and emerging market debt, and global and emerging market equities. Investments are further diversified by strategy, asset class, geography, and sector to enhance returns and mitigate downside risk. A large number of external investment managers are used to gain broad exposure to the financial markets and to mitigate manager-concentration risk.
Investment practices comply with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)(“ERISA”) and other applicable laws and regulations.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies used to measure the fair value of pension plan assets, including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in which each type of asset is generally classified (see Note SQ for the definition of fair value and a description of the fair value hierarchy).
Equities. These securities consist of: (i) direct investments in the stock of publicly traded U.S. and non-U.S. companies and equity derivatives, that are valued based on the closing price reported in an active market on which the individual securities are traded (generally classified in Level 1); (ii) the plans’ share of commingled funds that are invested in the stock of publicly traded companies and are valued at the net asset value of shares held at December 31 (included in Level 1)1 and Level 2); and (iii) direct investments in long/short equity hedge funds and private equity (limited partnerships and venture capital partnerships) that are valued at net asset value.
Fixed income. These securities consist of: (i) U.S. government debt that are generally valued using quoted prices (included in Level 1); (ii) cash and cash equivalents invested in publicly-traded funds and are valued based on the closing price reported in an active market on which the individual securities are traded (generally classified in Level 1); (iii) publicly traded U.S. and non-U.S. fixed interest obligations (principally corporate bonds and debentures) and are valued through consultation and evaluation with brokers in the institutional market using quoted prices and other observable market data (included in Level 2);

(iv) fixed income derivatives that are generally valued using industry standard models with market-based observable inputs (included in Level 2); and (v) cash and cash equivalents invested in institutional funds and are valued at net asset value.
Other investments. These investments include, among others: (i) exchange traded funds, such as gold, and real estate investment trusts andthat are valued based on the closing price reported in an activequoted prices and other observable market on which the investments are tradeddata (included in Level 1)2) and (ii) direct investments of discretionary and systematic macro hedge funds and private real estate (includes limited partnerships) and are valued at net asset value.
The fair value methods described above may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Additionally, while ArconicHowmet believes the valuation methods used by the plans’ trustees are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

61


The following table presents the fair value of pension plan assets classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy or net asset cost:value:
December 31, 2022Level 1Level 2Net Asset ValueTotal
Equities:
Equity securities$— $133 $283 $416 
Long/short equity hedge funds— — 18 18 
Private equity— — 107 107 
$— $133 $408 $541 
Fixed income:
Intermediate and long duration government/credit$107 $148 $— $255 
Other59 — 65 
 $113 $207 $— $320 
Other investments:
Real estate$— $$62 $65 
Discretionary and systematic macro hedge funds— — 29 29 
Other— — 
 $— $$98 $101 
Net plan assets(1)
$113 $343 $506 $962 
December 31, 2021Level 1Level 2Net Asset ValueTotal
Equities:
Equity securities$$197 $409 $608 
Long/short equity hedge funds— — 60 60 
Private equity— — 126 126 
$$197 $595 $794 
Fixed income:
Intermediate and long duration government/credit$124 $328 $— $452 
Other15 119 — 134 
 $139 $447 $— $586 
Other investments:
Real estate$— $— $64 $64 
Discretionary and systematic macro hedge funds— — 47 47 
Other— — 23 23 
 $— $— $134 $134 
Net plan assets(2)
$141 $644 $729 $1,514 
(1)
December 31, 2019Level 1 Level 2 Net asset value Total
Equities:   
Equity securities$590
 $
 $508
 $1,098
Long/short equity hedge funds
 
 260
 260
Private equity
 
 155
 155
 $590
 $
 $923
 $1,513
Fixed income:   
Intermediate and long duration government/credit$121
 $1,047
 $1,003
 $2,171
Other126
 7
 144
 277
 $247
 $1,054
 $1,147
 $2,448
Other investments:   
Real estate$104
 $
 $165
 $269
Discretionary and systematic macro hedge funds
 
 405
 405
Other
 
 240
 240
 $104
 $
 $810
 $914
Net plan assets(1)
$941
 $1,054
 $2,880
 $4,875

As of December 31, 2022, the total fair value of pension plans’ assets excludes a net receivable
of $8, which represents securities purchased and sold but not yet settled plus interest and dividends earned on various investments.
December 31, 2018Level 1 Level 2 Net Asset Value Total
Equities       
Equity securities$318
 $
 $578
 $896
Long/short equity hedge funds
 
 232
 232
Private equity
 
 147
 147
 $318
 $
 $957
 $1,275
Fixed income:
      
Intermediate and long duration government/credit$200
 $934
 $770
 $1,904
Other9
 9
 152
 170
 $209
 $943
 $922
 $2,074
Other investments:       
Real estate$81
 $
 $164
 $245
Discretionary and systematic macro hedge funds
 
 471
 471
Other56
 
 212
 268
 $137
 $
 $847
 $984
Net plan assets(2)
$664
 $943
 $2,726
 $4,333
(1)(2)As of December 31, 2021, the total fair value of pension plans’ assets excludes a net receivable of $17, which represents securities purchased and sold but not yet settled plus interest and dividends earned on various investments.
As of December 31, 2019, the total fair value of pension plans’ assets excludes a net payable of $7, which represents securities purchased and sold but not yet settled plus interest and dividends earned on various investments.
(2)
As of December 31, 2018, the total fair value of pension plans’ assets excludes a net receivable of $1, which represents securities purchased and sold but not yet settled plus interest and dividends earned on various investments.

Funding and Cash Flows
It is Arconic’sHowmet’s policy to fund amounts for pension plans sufficient to meet the minimum requirements set forth in applicable countrythe benefits laws and tax laws.laws of the applicable country. Periodically, ArconicHowmet contributes additional amounts as deemed appropriate. In 20192022 and 2018,2021, cash contributions to Arconic’sHowmet’s pension plans were $268$43 and $298,$96, respectively. The $268 includes $532021 cash contributions include $12 that was contributed to the Company’s U.S. plans that was in excess of the minimum required under ERISA.
The contributioncontributions to the Company’s pension plans in 2020 is2023 are estimated to be $475$45 (of which $403which $35 is for U.S. plans). The minimum required is $415, along with approximately $60

62


Due to actions designed to reduce future obligations.
During the third quarter of 2016, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation approved management’s plan to separate the Alcoa Inc. pension plans between Arconic Inc. and Alcoa Corporation. The plan stipulated that Arconic make cash contributions of $150 over a period of 30 months (from November 1, 2016) to its two largest pension plans. The Company satisfied the requirements of the plan by making paymentsadministration change of $34, $66, and $50certain Medicare-eligible prescription drug benefits to an Employer Group Waiver Plan with a wrap-around secondary plan in April 2019, March 2018, and April 2017, respectively.
2021, there will be no direct Medicare Part D subsidy receipts going forward. Benefit payments expected to be paid to pension and other postretirement benefit plans’ participants and expected Medicare Part D subsidy receipts are as follows utilizing the current assumptions outlined above:
For the year ended December 31,
Pension
benefits paid
 
Gross Other post-
retirement
benefits
 
Medicare Part D
subsidy receipts
 
Net Other post-
retirement
benefits
2020$470
 $80
 $5
 $75
2021465
 80
 5
 75
2022460
 80
 5
 75
2023455
 80
 5
 75
2024450
 75
 5
 70
Thereafter2,120
 260
 25
 235
 $4,420
 $655
 $50
 $605

For the year ended December 31,Pension
benefits paid
Other post-
retirement
benefits
2023$144 $11 
2024129 11 
2025128 11 
2026126 11 
2027125 10 
2028 - 2032581 48 
 $1,233 $102 
Defined Contribution Plans
ArconicHowmet sponsors savings and investment plans in various countries, primarily in the United States. Arconic’sU.S. Howmet’s contributions and expenses related to these plans were $125, $123,$76, $66, and $89$73 in 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively. In the United States,U.S. employees may contribute a portion of their compensation to the plans, and ArconicHowmet matches a portion of these contributions in equivalent form of the investments elected by the employee. Additionally, for certain U.S. employees, Howmet makes a contribution of either a percentage of applicable eligible compensation or per hour worked.
G.I. Income Taxes
The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes were as follows:
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
United States$287 $28 $84 
Foreign319 296 87 
 Total$606 $324 $171 
For the year ended December 31,

2019 2018 2017
United States$275
 $518
 $500
Foreign300
 350
 (30)
 $575
 $868
 $470
63


The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Current:
Federal(1)
$$(9)$(2)
Foreign53 39 
State and local— (2)(2)
 56 28 (2)
Deferred:
Federal71 22 (67)
Foreign11 11 
State and local18 
 81 38 (38)
Total$137 $66 $(40)
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Current:     
Federal(1)
$4
 $45
 $
Foreign108
 138
 98
State and local5
 4
 (2)
 117
 187
 96
Deferred:     
Federal65
 146
 489
Foreign(53) (94) 37
State and local(24) (13) (78)
 (12) 39
 448
Total$105
 $226
 $544
(1)(1)Includes U.S. taxes related to foreign income.
Includes U.S. taxes related to foreign income
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to Arconic’sHowmet’s effective tax rate was as follows (the effective tax rate for all periods2022 and 2021 was a provision on income and for 2020 was a benefit on income):
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
U.S. federal statutory rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Foreign tax rate differential0.1 (0.7)(1.2)
U.S. and residual tax on foreign earnings(1)
1.2 6.5 5.6 
U.S. state and local taxes0.7 1.0 2.2 
Federal cost of state tax(0.2)(0.3)(2.0)
Permanent differences related to asset disposals and items included in restructuring and other charges— (0.3)6.8 
Non-deductible officer compensation1.2 1.6 3.5 
Statutory tax rate and law changes(2)
0.1 1.0 (15.9)
Tax holidays(0.5)(0.4)(0.4)
Tax credits(3)
(0.9)(10.4)(0.4)
Changes in valuation allowances(4)
1.4 5.1 74.8 
Changes in uncertain tax positions(5)
— — (116.9)
Excess benefit for stock compensation(0.8)(0.3)(0.7)
Prior year tax adjustments(0.1)(3.7)(1.7)
Other(0.6)0.3 1.9 
Effective tax rate22.6 %20.4 %(23.4)%
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
U.S. federal statutory rate21.0 % 21.0 % 35.0 %
Foreign tax rate differential2.6
 2.4
 (8.7)
U.S. and residual tax on foreign earnings6.0
 1.6
 (0.1)
U.S. State and local taxes2.5
 1.5
 0.7
Federal benefit of state tax0.4
 (0.3) 3.7
Permanent differences related to asset disposals and items included in restructuring and other charges(1)
(22.9) (16.9) (167.4)
Non-deductible transaction costs1.6
 
 0.3
Non-deductible officer compensation1.8
 0.1
 
Statutory tax rate and law changes(2)
(0.2) 6.5
 52.5
Tax holidays(3.2) (1.6) (3.0)
Changes in valuation allowances(3)
(14.2) 0.9
 137.9
Impairment of goodwill
 
 53.5
Changes in uncertain tax positions6.1
 12.8
 10.1
Prior year tax adjustments(4)
15.2
 (2.6) (0.9)
Other1.6
 0.6
 2.1
Effective tax rate18.3 % 26.0 % 115.7 %

(1)
It is Howmet’s policy to treat taxes due from future inclusions in U.S. taxable income related to GILTI as a current period expense when incurred.
(1)
In 2019, a net tax benefit was recognized related to a U.S. tax
(2)In 2020, final regulations were issued that provided an election which caused the deemed liquidation of a foreign subsidiary's assets into its U.S. tax parent. The benefit is partially offset by an increase in uncertain tax positions. Losses reported in Spain's 2017 tax return related to the Separation of Alcoa are offset by an increased valuation allowance.
(2)
In 2018, the Company finalized its accounting for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("the 2017 Act”) and recorded an additional $59 charge. In December 2017, an estimated $272 tax charge was recorded with respect to the enactment of the 2017 Act.
(3)
In 2019, the Company released a valuation allowance related to 2015 and 2016 foreign tax credits, subsequent to filing U.S. amended tax returns to deduct, rather than credit, foreign taxes.
(4)
In 2019, the Company filed U.S. amended tax returns to deduct, rather than credit, 2015 and 2016 foreign taxes resulting in a tax cost associated with the write-off of the deferred tax asset for the credit, partially offset by a tax benefit for the deduction.

On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Act was signed into law, making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limitedexclude from GILTI any foreign earnings subject to a corporatelocal country tax rate decrease from 35%of at least 90% of the U.S. tax rate. The Company recorded a $30 benefit related to 21% effectivethis tax law change.
(3)In 2021, a $32 benefit for income tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the transition of U.S. international taxation fromcredits related to development incentives in Hungary was recognized.
(4)In 2020, a worldwide$104 valuation allowance was recorded related to deferred tax systemassets that were previously subject to a territorial system, and a one-time transition tax on the non-previously taxed post-1986 foreign earnings and profits of certain U.S.-owned foreign corporations as of December 31, 2017. Also on December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,reserve that was issued by the SEC to address the application of U.S. GAAP for financial reporting. SAB 118 permitted the use of provisional amounts based on reasonable estimatesotherwise released in the financial statements. SAB 118 also provided that the tax impact may be considered incomplete in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the 2017 Act.
The Company calculated a reasonable estimate of the impact of the 2017 Act’s tax rate reduction and one-time transition tax in its 2017 year end income tax provision in accordance with its understanding of the 2017 Act and guidance available and, as a result, recorded a $272 tax charge in the fourth quarter of 2017, the period in which the legislation was enacted.
In 2018, the Company included a $59 tax charge in income from continuing operations2020 as a result of finalizing its accounting fora favorable Spanish tax case decision.
(5)In 2020, the 2017 Tax Act in accordance with SAB 118. This charge primarilyCompany released a $64 reserve liability and a $104 reserve recorded as a contra balance against deferred tax assets as a result of a favorable Spanish tax case decision. A $30 benefit related to a $16 charge for the one-time transitionpreviously uncertain U.S. tax and a $43 charge to update deferred tax balances.position was also recognized in 2020.

64


The components of net deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
 20222021
December 31,Deferred
tax
assets
Deferred
tax
liabilities
Deferred
tax
assets
Deferred
tax
liabilities
Depreciation$11 $492 $$538 
Employee benefits232 300 
Loss provisions26 20 
Deferred income/expense62 1,161 50 1,098 
Interest99 — 105 — 
Tax loss carryforwards2,955 — 3,226 — 
Tax credit carryforwards268 — 358 — 
Other10 
$3,659 $1,661 $4,077 $1,647 
Valuation allowance(1,965)— (2,279)— 
 $1,694 $1,661 $1,798 $1,647 
 2019 2018
December 31,
Deferred
tax
assets
 
Deferred
tax
liabilities
 
Deferred
tax
assets
 
Deferred
tax
liabilities
Depreciation$25
 $729
 $38
 $694
Employee benefits887
 16
 836
 27
Loss provisions92
 
 94
 
Deferred income/expense96
 943
 22
 1,102
Interest56
 
 
 
Tax loss carryforwards2,932
 
 3,159
 
Tax credit carryforwards379
 
 579
 
Other52
 16
 94
 20
 $4,519
 $1,704
 $4,822
 $1,843
Valuation allowance(2,256) 
 (2,486) 
 $2,263
 $1,704
 $2,336
 $1,843

The following table details the expiration periods of the deferred tax assets presented above:
December 31, 2022Expires
within
10 years
Expires
within
11-20 years
No
Expiration(1)
Other(2)
Total
Tax loss carryforwards$362 $533 $2,060 $— $2,955 
Tax credit carryforwards196 59 13 — 268 
Other(3)
— — 380 56 436 
Valuation allowance(522)(234)(1,204)(5)(1,965)
 $36 $358 $1,249 $51 $1,694 
(1)Deferred tax assets with no expiration may still have annual limitations on utilization.
December 31, 2019
Expires
within
10 years
 
Expires
within
11-20 years
 
No
expiration(1)
 
Other(2)
 Total
Tax loss carryforwards$452
 $235
 $2,245
 $
 $2,932
Tax credit carryforwards300
 69
 10
 
 379
Other
 
 120
 1,088
 1,208
Valuation allowance(711) (176) (1,306) (63) (2,256)
 $41
 $128
 $1,069
 $1,025
 $2,263
(2)Other represents deferred tax assets whose expiration is dependent upon the reversal of the underlying temporary difference.
(1)
(3)A substantial amount of Other deferred tax assets relates to employee benefits that will become deductible for tax purposes in jurisdictions with unlimited expiration over an extended period of time as contributions are made to employee benefit plans and payments are made to retirees.
Deferred tax assets with no expiration may still have annual limitations on utilization.
(2)
Other represents deferred tax assets whose expiration is dependent upon the reversal of the underlying temporary difference. A substantial amount of Other relates to employee benefits that will become deductible for tax purposes over an extended period of time as contributions are made to employee benefit plans and payments are made to retirees.
The total deferred tax asset (net of valuation allowance) is supported by projections of future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences (27%(4%), and taxable temporary differences that reverse within the carryforward period (73%(96%).
Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not (greater than 50%) that a tax benefit will not be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, management considers all potential sources of

taxable income, including income available in carryback periods, future reversals of taxable temporary differences, projections of taxable income, and income from tax planning strategies, as well as all available positive and negative evidence. Positive evidence includes factors such as a history of profitable operations, projections of future profitability within the carryforward period, including from tax planning strategies, and Arconic’sHowmet’s experience with similar operations. Existing favorable contracts and the ability to sell products into established markets are additional positive evidence. Negative evidence includes items such as cumulative losses, projections of future losses, or carryforward periods that are not long enough to allow for the utilization of a deferred tax asset based on existing projections of income. Deferred tax assets for which no valuation allowance is recorded may not be realized upon changes in facts and circumstances, resulting in a future charge to establish a valuation allowance. Existing valuation allowances are re-examined under the same standards of positive and negative evidence. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be realized, the appropriate amount of the valuation allowance, if any, is released. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are also re-measuredremeasured to reflect changes in underlying tax rates due to law changes and the granting and lapse of tax holidays.
In 2018, Arconic made a final accountingIt is Howmet’s policy election to apply a tax law ordering approach when considering the need for a valuation allowance on net operating losses expected to offset GILTI income inclusions. Under this approach, reductions in cash tax savings are not considered as part of the valuation allowance assessment. Instead, future GILTI inclusions are considered a source of taxable income that support the realizability of deferred tax assets.
Arconic’s
65


Howmet’s foreign tax credits in the United StatesU.S. have a 10-year carryforward period with expirations ranging from 20202023 to 20282027 (as of December 31, 2019)2022). Valuation allowances were initially established in prior years on a portion of the foreign tax credit carryforwards, primarily due to insufficient foreign source income to allow for full utilization of the credits within the expiration period. After consideration of all available evidence including potential tax planning strategies, incremental valuation allowances of $46 and $9 were recognized in 2018 and 2017, respectively. No additional valuation allowance was recorded in 2019 as the Company intends to deduct, rather than credit, foreign taxes. Foreign tax credits of $88, $8,$68 and $57$22 expired at the end of 2019, 2018,2022 and 2017,2021, respectively, resulting in a corresponding decrease to the valuation allowance. In 2022, the Company decided to increase the valuation allowance by $12 in order to fully reserve the foreign tax credit carryover after weighing all available evidence including foreign source income projections. The valuation allowance was also reduced in 2021 by $113$9 as a result of Arconic deductingupdated U.S. regulatory guidance concerning the utilization of foreign taxes that weretax credits in connection with the one-time transition tax on the deemed repatriation of previously claimednon-taxed post-1986 earnings and profits of certain foreign subsidiaries enacted as part of the 2017 Act, and by $4 as a U.S.result of a corresponding reduction in the deferred tax asset related to suspended foreign tax credit.credits. At December 31, 2019,2022, the cumulative amount of the valuation allowance was $216.$124. The need for this valuation allowance will be reassessed on a continuous basis in future periods and, as a result, the allowance may increase or decrease based on changes in facts and circumstances.
Arconic also recordedDuring 2021, the Company concluded that it would not pursue a deduction related to a capital investment for which a deferred tax asset of $9 and offsetting valuation allowance of $10 related to capital losseshad previously been recorded. As such, both the deferred tax asset and capital investments in 2019. Capital losses can only offset capital gain income. Arconic does not have sufficient sources of capital gain income to support the utilization of these losses and investments.valuation allowance were eliminated. The need for valuation allowances against other capital losses and investments will be reassessed on a continuing basis. As of December 31, 2022, there is no valuation allowance recorded related to capital investments.
Arconic released $13The Company recorded a net $1 decrease, $3 increase, and $10 of certain$20 increase to U.S. state valuation allowances in 20192022, 2021, and 2018,2020, respectively. After weighing all available positive and negative evidence, the Company determined thatthe adjustments based on the underlying net deferred tax assets that were more likely than not realizable based on projected taxable income estimates.income. Changes in fully reserved U.S. state tax losses, credits and other deferred tax assets resulting from expirations, audit adjustments, tax rate, and tax law changes also resulted in a corresponding net $142 decrease, $20 increase, and $58 decrease in the valuation allowance in 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Valuation allowances of $672$489 remain against other net state deferred tax assets expected to expire before utilization. The need for valuation allowances against net state deferred tax assets will be reassessed on a continuous basis in future periods and, as a result, the allowance may increase or decrease based on changes in facts and circumstances.
In 2018, Arconic reduced2022, after weighing all available evidence, the Company released a $6 valuation allowance in the U.K. related to interest deduction carryforwards. In 2021, after weighing all available evidence, the Company recognized a discrete income tax cost to establish a valuation allowance of $8 in Switzerland. In 2020, the Company increased a valuation allowance by $92$104 as a result of increasingreleasing a tax reserve for unrecognized tax benefits in Spain. The valuation allowance reduction was partially offset byfollowing a $20 charge with respect to losses no longer supported by reversing temporary differences. Arconic also recorded an additional valuation allowance of $61 and $675 in 2018 and 2017, respectively, which offsets a deferred tax asset recorded for additional losses reported on thefavorable Spanish tax return related tocase decision. The need for valuation allowances will be reassessed by entity and by jurisdiction on a continuous basis in future periods and, as a result, the Separation of Alcoa that are not more likely than not to be realized.allowances may increase or decrease based on changes in facts and circumstances.

The following table details the changes in the valuation allowance:
December 31,2019 2018 2017
Balance at beginning of year$2,486
 $2,584
 $1,940
Increase to allowance37
 136
 831
Release of allowance(222) (154) (246)
Acquisitions and divestitures(2) 
 (1)
Tax apportionment, tax rate and tax law changes(13) (14) (24)
Foreign currency translation(30) (66) 84
Balance at end of year$2,256
 $2,486
 $2,584

As a result of the 2017 Act, the non-previously taxed post-1986 foreign earnings and profits (calculated based on U.S. tax principles) of certain U.S.-owned foreign corporations has been subject to U.S. tax under the one-time transition tax provisions. The 2017 Act also created a new requirement that certain income earned by foreign subsidiaries, GILTI, must be included in the gross income of the U.S. shareholder. The 2017 Act also established the Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT). In the first quarter of 2018, Arconic made a final accounting policy election to treat taxes due from future inclusions in U.S. taxable income related to GILTI as a current period expense when incurred. Arconic has estimated a GILTI inclusion for 2019 and 2018 and recorded tax expense accordingly. Arconic does not anticipate being subject to BEAT for 2019 and 2018.
December 31,202220212020
Balance at beginning of year$2,279 $2,307 $2,121 
Increase to allowance40 113 136 
Release of allowance(154)(94)(50)
Tax apportionment, tax rate and tax law changes(110)63 (23)
Foreign currency translation(90)(110)123 
Balance at end of year$1,965 $2,279 $2,307 
Foreign U.S. GAAP earnings that have not otherwise been subject to U.S. tax, will generally be exempt from future U.S. tax under the 2017 Act when distributed. Such distributions, as well as distributions of previously taxed foreign earnings, could potentially be subject to U.S. state tax in certain states, and foreign withholding taxes. Foreign currency gains/losses related to the translation of previously taxed earnings from functional currency to U.S. dollars could also be subject to U.S. tax when distributed. At this time, Arconic has no plans to distribute such earnings in the foreseeable future. If such earnings were to be distributed, ArconicHowmet would expect the potential withholding tax, U.S. state tax, and withholdingU.S. capital gains tax impacts to be immaterial and the potential deferred tax liability associated with future foreign currency gains to be impracticable to determine.
ArconicHowmet and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With a few minor exceptions, ArconicHowmet is no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2006.2014. All U.S. tax years prior to 20192022 have been audited by the Internal Revenue Service. Various state and foreign jurisdiction tax authorities are in the process of examining Arconic’sthe Company’s income tax returns for various tax years through 2018.2021. The Company had net cash income tax payments of $50 and $53 in 2022 and 2021, respectively, and net cash refunds of $33 in 2020.
66


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and penalties) was as follows:
December 31,2019 2018 2017
Balance at beginning of year$166
 $73
 $28
Additions for tax positions of the current year34
 
 23
Additions for tax positions of prior years3
 143
 27
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
 (42) 
Settlements with tax authorities
 
 
Expiration of the statute of limitations(2) (6) (5)
Foreign currency translation(4) (2) 
Balance at end of year$197
 $166
 $73

December 31,202220212020
Balance at beginning of year$$$176 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years— — (182)
Settlements with tax authorities— — (1)
Foreign currency translation— — 
Balance at end of year$$$
For all periods presented, a portion of the balance pertains to state tax liabilities, which are presented before any offset for federal tax benefits. The effect of unrecognized tax benefits, if recorded, that would impact the annual effective tax rate for 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 20172020 would be approximately 13%less than 1%, 5%1%, and 15%1%, respectively, of pre-tax book income. ArconicHowmet does not anticipate that changes in its unrecognized tax benefits will have a material impact on the Statement of Consolidated Operations during 2020.2023.
It is Arconic’sHowmet’s policy to recognize interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of the Provision for income taxes onin the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations. ArconicHowmet recognized interest of $6, $22less than $1, less than $1, and $1 for 2019, 2018,$2 in 2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively. Due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, settlements with tax authorities, reductions in prior accruals, and refunded overpayments, ArconicHowmet recognized interest income of $0,less than $1, $3, and $2$25 in 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, the amount accrued for the payment of interest and penalties was $23, $21,less than $1, less than $1, and $2, respectively.

H.J. Preferred and Common Stock
Preferred Stock. ArconicHowmet has 2two classes of preferred stock: $3.75 Cumulative Preferred Stock (“Class A Preferred StockStock”) and Class B Serial Preferred Stock. Class A Preferred Stock has 660,000 shares authorized at a par value of $100 per share with an annual $3.75 cumulative dividend preference per share. There were 546,024 shares of Class A Preferred Stock outstanding at both December 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021. Class B Serial Preferred Stock has 10,000,000 shares authorized at a par value of $1 per share. There were 0no shares of Class B Serial Preferred Stock outstanding at both December 31, 20192022 and 2018 (see below).2021.
In September 2014, Arconic completed a public offering under its shelf registration statement for $1,250 of 25 million depositary shares, each of which represented a 1/10th interest in a share of Arconic’s 5.375% Class B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series 1, par value $1 per share, liquidation preference $500 per share (the “Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock”). The 25 million depositary shares were equivalent to 2.5 million shares of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock. Each depositary share entitled the holder, through the depositary, to a proportional fractional interest in the rights and preferences of a share of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, including conversion, dividend, liquidation, and voting rights, subject to terms of the deposit agreement. Arconic received $1,213 in net proceeds from the public offering reflecting an underwriting discount. The net proceeds were used, together with the net proceeds of issued debt, to finance the cash portion of the acquisition of Firth Rixson. The underwriting discount was recorded as a decrease to Additional capital. The Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock constituted a series of Arconic’s Class B Serial Preferred Stock, which ranks senior to Arconic’s common stock and junior to Arconic’s Class A Preferred Stock and existing and future indebtedness. Holders of the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock generally had no voting rights.
Dividends on the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock were cumulative in nature and paid at the rate of $26.8750 per annum per share in 2016 and 2015, which commenced January 1, 2015 (paid on December 30, 2014).
On October 2, 2017, all outstanding 24,975,978 depositary shares (each depositary share representing a 1/10th interest in a share of the mandatory convertible preferred stock) were converted at a rate of 1.56996 into 39,211,286 common shares; 24,022 depositary shares were previously tendered for early conversion into 31,420 shares of Arconic common stock. No gain or loss was recognized associated with this equity transaction. Dividends on the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock were paid at the rate of $20.1563 per share in 2017.
Common Stock. At December 31, 2019,2022, there were 600,000,000 shares authorized and 432,855,183412,155,057 shares issued and outstanding. Dividends paid were $0.10 per share in 2022 ($0.02 per share in each of $0.12the first, second, and third quarters of 2022 and $0.04 per annumshare in the fourth quarter of 2022), $0.04 per share in 2021 ($0.06 dividend0.02 per share in each of the third and fourth quarters of 2021), and $0.02 per share in 2020 (all in the first quarter of 2019 and $0.02 per quarter for the remainder of the year) in 2019 and $0.24 per annum or $0.06 per quarter in 2018 and 2017.2020).
As of December 31, 2019,2022, 47 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under Arconic’sHowmet’s stock-based compensation plans. As of December 31, 2019, 372022, 29 million shares remain available for issuance. ArconicHowmet issues new shares to satisfy the exercise of stock options and the conversion of stock awards.
In July 2015, through the acquisition
67


Common Stock Outstanding and settled in cash on December 1, 2015 (principal amount of $115) and the other tranche was due on October 15, 2019 (principal amount of $403), unless earlier converted or purchased by Arconic at the holder’s option under specific conditions. No shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in connection with the maturity or final conversion of this convertible debt. See Note P for additional details.
Share Activity (number of shares)
Common stock
TreasuryOutstanding
Balance at end of 2016December 31, 2019
432,855,183 438,519,780
Conversion of convertible notes
39,242,706
Issued for stock-based compensation plans
3,896,119 3,654,051
Balance at end of 2017
481,416,537
Issued for stock-based compensation plans
1,854,180
Balance at end of 2018
483,270,717
Issued for stock-based compensation plans
4,436,830
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
(3,844,925)(54,852,364)
Balance at endDecember 31, 2020432,906,377 
Issued for stock-based compensation plans2,195,681 
Repurchase and retirement of 2019common stock
(13,410,146)432,855,183
Balance at December 31, 2021
421,691,912 
Issued for stock-based compensation plans1,819,651 
Repurchase and retirement of common stock(11,356,506)
Balance at December 31, 2022412,155,057 
The following table provides details for share repurchases during 2022, 2021, and 2020:
Number of shares
Average price per share(1)
Total
Q1 2022 open market repurchase5,147,307 $34.00$175
Q2 2022 open market repurchase1,770,271 $33.89$60
Q3 2022 open market repurchase2,764,846 $36.17$100
Q4 2022 open market repurchase1,674,082 $38.83$65
2022 Share repurchase total11,356,506 $35.22$400
Q2 2021 accelerated share repurchase5,878,791 $34.02$200
Q3 2021 open market repurchase769,274 $32.50$25
Q4 2021 open market repurchase6,762,081 $30.32$205
2021 Share repurchase total13,410,146 $32.07$430
Q3 2020 open market repurchase2,907,094 $17.36$51
Q4 2020 open market repurchase937,831 $23.99$22
2020 Share repurchase total3,844,925 $18.98$73

(1)
Excludes commissions cost.
On February 19, 2019, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank to repurchase $700 of its common stock (the “February 2019 ASR”), pursuant to the share repurchase programs

previously authorized by its Board of Directors (the Board). Under the February 2019 ASR, Arconic received an initial deliveryThe total value of shares on February 21, 2019repurchased during 2022, 2021, and additional shares on April 29, 2019. On May 2, 2019, the Company entered into an ASR agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank to repurchase $200 of its common stock (the “May 2019 ASR”), pursuant to the share repurchase programs previously authorized by its Board. Under the May 2019 ASR, Arconic received an initial delivery of shares on May 6, 20192020 were $400, $430, and additional shares on June 12, 2019. On May 14, 2019, the Board authorized an additional share repurchase program of up to $500 of its outstanding common stock. On August 6, 2019, the Company entered into an ASR agreement with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC to repurchase $200 of its common stock (the “August 2019 ASR”), pursuant to the share repurchase programs previously authorized by its Board. Under the August 2019 ASR, Arconic received an initial delivery of shares on August 8, 2019 and additional shares on October 3, 2019. On November 14, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. to repurchase $50 of its common stock (the “November 2019 share repurchase program”), pursuant to the share repurchase programs previously authorized by its Board.$73, respectively. All of the shares repurchased during 20192022, 2021, and 2020 were immediately retired. After giving effect to the February 2019 ASR, May 2019 ASR, August 2019 ASR, and November 2019 share repurchase program, $350 remainsrepurchases made through December 31, 2022, approximately $947 remained available for share repurchases as of January 1, 2023 under the prior authorizations by the Board forBoard. Under the Company’s share repurchase programs (the “Share Repurchase Programs”), the Company may repurchase shares by means of trading plans established from time to time in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, block trades, private transactions, open market repurchases through the end of 2020.
The following table provides detailsand/or accelerated share repurchase agreements or other derivative transactions. There is no stated expiration for the share repurchases during 2019.Share Repurchase Programs. Under its Share Repurchase Programs, the Company may repurchase shares from time to time, in amounts, at prices, and at such times as the Company deems appropriate, subject to market conditions, legal requirements and other considerations. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any specific number of shares or to do so at any particular time, and the Share Repurchase Programs may be suspended, modified or terminated at any time without prior notice.

Share delivery dateNumber of shares Average price Total
February 21, 201931,908,831    
April 29, 20194,525,592    
February 2019 ASR total36,434,423 $19.21 $700
      
May 6, 20197,455,732    
June 12, 20191,561,249    
May 2019 ASR total9,016,981 $22.18 $200
      
August 8, 20196,791,172    
October 3, 2019983,107    
August 2019 ASR total7,774,279 $25.73 $200
      
November 18, 2019428,000    
November 19, 2019428,000    
November 20, 2019370,000    
November 21, 2019400,681    
November 2019 share repurchase program1,626,681 $30.74 $50
      
2019 Share repurchase total54,852,364 $20.97 $1,150
68


Stock-Based Compensation
ArconicHowmet has a stock-based compensation plan under which stock options and/or restricted stock unit awards are granted, generally, in the first quarterhalf of each year to eligible employees. Stock options are granted at the closing market price of Arconic’sHowmet’s common stock on the date of grant and typically vest over a three-year service period (1/3 each year) with a ten-year contractual term. Restricted stock unit awards typically vest over a three-year service period from the date of grant. As part of Arconic’sHowmet’s stock-based compensation plan design, individuals who are retirement-eligible have a six-month requisite service period in the year of grant. Certain of the restricted stock unit awards include performance and market conditions and are granted to a limited number ofcertain eligible employees. In 2019,2020, performance stock awards were granted to the CEOa senior executive that vest either based on achievement of the plannedArconic Inc. Separation of ArconicTransaction (see Note CU for further details) or the achievement of certain stock price thresholds. PerformanceFor performance stock awards granted in the first quarter of 2019 were converted to restricted stock unit2022, 2021, and for annual performance awards (at target),granted in order to address the planned Separation of Arconic. For performance stock awards issued in 2018 and 2017,2020, the final number of shares earned will be based on Arconic’sHowmet’s achievement of sales and profitability targets over the respective performance periods and will be earned at the end of the third year. Additionally, the 2018annual 2022, 2021, and 20172020 performance stock awards will be scaled by a total shareholder return (“TSR”) multiplier, which depends upon relative performance against the TSRs of a group of peer companies.
In conjunction with their employment agreements, certain current and former executives were granted cash bonus awards based on the achievement of certain stock price thresholds. These awards are liability classified and were marked-to-market each

quarter using a Monte Carlo simulation. At the end of the year, theThe stock price thresholds have beenwere fully reached. The cash payment of $23 will occuroccurred in 2021 in accordance with the terms of the agreements.
In 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017, Arconic2020, Howmet recognized stock-based compensation expense of $78$54 ($7049 after-tax), $50$40 ($3936 after-tax), and $54$46 ($3642 after-tax), respectively. Senior executive performance awards granted in April 2020 were modified in June 2020, resulting in incremental compensation expense of $12, which is amortized over the remaining service period ending April 1, 2023. Additionally, the effect of the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction was a modification of the original stock options and restricted stock award units. The modifications were designed with the intention that the intrinsic value of the stock option or stock award were the same both previous to and after the adjustments. An immaterial charge was recorded to Restructuring and other charges related to the modification.
All stock-based compensation expense recorded in 2022 and 2021 relates to restricted stock unit awards. Cash bonus awards of $21$2 were recorded in 2019.2020. Of the remaining stock-based compensation expense in 2019,2020, more than 95% relates to restricted stock unit awards. The expense related to restricted stock unit awards in 2018 and 2017 was approximately 85%. NaNNo stock-based compensation expense was capitalized in any of those years. Stock-based compensation expense was reduced by $3 and $13$2 in 2019 and 2017, respectively,2021 for certain executive pre-vest cancellations, which were recorded in Restructuring and other charges within the Statement of Consolidated Operations. At December 31, 2019,2022, there was $50$35 (pre-tax) of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock option grants and non-vested restricted stock unit award grants. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years.
Stock-based compensation expense is based on the grant date fair value of the applicable equity grant. For restricted stock unit awards, the fair value wasis equivalent to the closing market price of Arconic’sHowmet’s common stock on the date of grant. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the 20192022 and 2021 performance stock awards with a market condition scaled by a TSR multiplier is $44.44 and $43.41, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of the April 2020 senior executive performance stock awards with a market condition (achievement of certain stock price thresholds) was $11.93.is $2.57. The grant date fair value of the 2018 performance stock awards containing a market condition (scaled by TSR multiplier) was $20.25. The 20192022, 2021, and 20182020 performance awards were valued using a Monte Carlo model. A Monte Carlo simulation uses assumptions of stock price behavior to estimate the probability of satisfying market conditions and the resulting fair value of the award. The risk-free interest rate (1.6%(2.0% in 20192022, 0.2% in 2021, and 2.7% in 2018)0.3% in 2020) was based on a yield curve of interest rates at the time of the grant based on the remaining performance period. In 20192022, 2021, and 2020, volatility of 39.4%, 56.0%, and 48.3%, respectively, was estimated using implied andHowmet's historical volatility (33.4%). Becausein 2022 and a blended rate of limitedHowmet's historical informationvolatility and a peer-based volatility due to the Arconic Inc. Separation of Alcoa, 2018 volatility (32.0%) was estimated using implied volatility,Transaction and the representative price return approach, which uses price returnsrelated changes in the nature of comparable companies, was used to develop a correlation assumption. For stockthe business in 2021 and 2020. Stock options the fair value was estimated on the date of grant using a lattice-pricing model, which generated a result of $9.79 and $6.26 per option in 2018 and 2017, respectively. There were no stock options issued in 2019. The lattice-pricing model uses a number of assumptions to estimate the fair value of a stock option, including a risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, volatility, exercise behavior, and contractual life. The following paragraph describes in detail the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock optionslast granted in 2018 (the assumptions used to estimate the fair value2018.
69


The risk-free interest rate (2.5%) was based on a yield curve of interest rates at the time of the grant based on the contractual life of the option. The dividend yield (0.9%) was based on a one-year average. Volatility (34.0% for 2018 and 38.1% in 2017) was based on comparable companies and implied volatilities over the term of the option. Arconic utilized historical option forfeiture data to estimate annual post-vesting forfeitures (6%). Exercise behavior (61%) was based on a weighted average exercise ratio (exercise patterns for grants issued over the number of years in the contractual option term) of an option’s intrinsic value resulting from historical employee exercise behavior. Based upon the other assumptions used in the determination of the fair value, the life of an option (6.0 years) was an output of the lattice-pricing model. The activity for stock options and stock awards during 20192022 was as follows (options and awards in millions):
 Stock options Stock awards
  
Number of
options
 
Weighted
average
exercise price
 
Number of
awards
 
Weighted
average FMV
per award
Outstanding, December 31, 201810
 $24.95
 7
 $21.13
Granted
 
 4
 19.80
Exercised(2) 21.34
 
 
Converted
 
 (3) 15.78
Expired or forfeited(1) 28.37
 (1) 22.10
Performance share adjustment
 
 
 19.96
Outstanding, December 31, 20197
 $25.75
 7
 $22.05

 Stock optionsStock awards
  Number of
options
Weighted
average
exercise price per option
Number of
awards
Weighted
average FMV
per award
Outstanding, December 31, 2021$23.64 $16.19 
Granted— — 35.79 
Exercised(1)22.75 — — 
Converted— — (2)16.35 
Expired or forfeited— 33.61 (1)24.92 
Outstanding, December 31, 2022$23.86 $17.77 
As of December 31, 2019,2022, the number of stock options outstanding had a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.42.1 years and a total intrinsic value of $40. Additionally, 5.9 million$15. All of the stock options outstanding were fully vested and exercisableexercisable. In 2022, 2021, and had a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.0 years, a weighted average exercise price of $25.80, and a total intrinsic value of $36 as of December 31, 2019. In 2019, 2018, and 2017,2020, the cash received from stock option exercises was $56, $16, $22, and $50$33, respectively, and the total tax benefit realized from these exercises was $4,$2, $2, and $4,$3, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 20172020 was $17, $7,$10, $10, and $13,$14, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock awards converted during 2022, 2021, and 2020 was $61, $55, and $104, respectively.

I.K. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS)(“EPS”) amounts are computed by dividing earnings, (loss), after the deduction of preferred stock dividends declared, by the average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS amounts assume the issuance of common stock for all potentially dilutive share equivalents outstanding.
The information used to compute basic and diluted EPS attributable to ArconicHowmet common shareholders was as follows (shares in millions):
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Net income from continuing operations$469 $258 $211 
Less: preferred stock dividends declared
Net income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders467 256 209 
Income from discontinued operations— — 50 
Net income attributable to common shareholders - basic and diluted$467 $256 $259 
Average shares outstanding - basic416 430 435 
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock and performance awards
Average shares outstanding - diluted421 435 439 
For the year ended December 31,2019 2018 2017
Net income (loss)$470
 $642
 $(74)
Less: preferred stock dividends declared(2) (2) (53)
Net income (loss) available to Arconic common shareholders - basic468
 640
 (127)
Add: interest expense related to convertible notes9
 11
 
Net income (loss) available to Arconic common shareholders - diluted$477
 $651
 $(127)
Average shares outstanding - basic446
 483
 451
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Stock options1
 1
 
Stock and performance awards5
 5
 
Convertible notes(1)
11
 14
 
Average shares outstanding - diluted463
 503
 451

(1)
The convertible notes matured on October 15, 2019 (see Note P). No shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in connection with the maturity or the final conversion of the convertible notes. As of October 15, 2019, the calculation of average diluted shares outstanding ceased to include the approximately 15 million shares of common stock and the corresponding interest expense previously attributable to the convertible notes.
Common stock outstanding at December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 was 433approximately 412 million and 483422 million, respectively.
The 14 million decrease in common stockaverage shares outstanding at(basic) for the year ended December 31, 20192022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021 was primarily due to the impact of share repurchases of approximately 5511 million in 2019 (see Note H).shares repurchased during 2022. As average shares outstanding are used in the calculation forof both basic and diluted EPS, the full impact of share repurchases wasis not realized in EPS in 2019 as the share repurchases occurred at varying points during 2019.year of repurchase.
The following shares were excluded from the calculation of average shares outstanding – diluted as their effect was anti-dilutive (shares in millions).:
For the year ended December 31,202220212020
Stock options— — 
70

 2019 2018 2017
Mandatory convertible preferred stockn/a
 n/a
 39
Convertible notes
 
 14
Stock options(1)
1
 9
 11
Stock awards
 
 7

(1)
The average exercise price of options per share was $35.75, $26.79, and $33.32 for 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

J.L. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table details the activity of the fourthree components that comprise Accumulated other comprehensive lossloss:
  202220212020
Pension and other postretirement benefits (H)
Balance at beginning of period$(799)$(980)$(2,732)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrecognized net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost/benefit87 111 (211)
Tax (expense) benefit(18)(26)48 
Total Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax69 85 (163)
Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost(1)
99 123 149 
Tax expense(2)
(22)(27)(32)
Total amount reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax(3)
77 96 117 
Total Other comprehensive income (loss)146 181 (46)
Transfer to Arconic Corporation— — 1,798 
Balance at end of period$(653)$(799)$(980)
Foreign currency translation
Balance at beginning of period$(1,062)$(966)$(596)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(4)
(131)(96)58 
Transfer to Arconic Corporation— — (428)
Balance at end of period$(1,193)$(1,062)$(966)
Cash flow hedges
Balance at beginning of period$(2)$$(1)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Net change from periodic revaluations(8)20 — 
Tax benefit (expense)(4)— 
Total Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax(6)16 — 
Net amount reclassified to earnings17 (26)
Tax (expense) benefit(2)
(4)(2)
Total amount reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(3)
13 (21)
Total Other comprehensive income (loss)(5)
Balance at end of period$$(2)$
Accumulated other comprehensive loss balance at end of period$(1,841)$(1,863)$(1,943)
(1)These amounts were recorded in Other expense, net (see Note G) and Restructuring and other charges (see Note E) in the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
(2)These amounts were included in Provision (benefit) for both Arconic’s shareholdersincome taxes (see Note I) in the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
(3)A positive amount indicates a corresponding charge to earnings and noncontrolling interests:a negative amount indicates a corresponding benefit to earnings.
(4)In all periods presented, no amounts were reclassified to earnings.

71


 Arconic Noncontrolling Interests
  
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Pension and other postretirement benefits (F)
           
Balance at beginning of period$(2,344) $(2,230) $(2,010) $
 $
 $
Adoption of accounting standard (A)

 (369) 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:          
Unrecognized net actuarial gain and prior service cost/benefit(587) 70
 (466) 
 
 
Tax benefit (expense)129
 (19) 102
 
 
 
Total Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax(458) 51
 (364) 
 
 
Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost(1)
90
 262
 222
 
 
 
Tax expense(2)
(20) (58) (78) 
 
 
Total amount reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax(3)
70
 204
 144
 
 
 
Total Other comprehensive (loss) income(388) 255
 (220) 
 
 
Balance at end of period$(2,732) $(2,344) $(2,230) $
 $
 $
Foreign currency translation           
Balance at beginning of period$(583) $(437) $(689) $
 $
 $(2)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(4)
(13) (146) 252
 
 
 2
Balance at end of period$(596) $(583) $(437) $
 $
 $
Debt securities           
Balance at beginning of period$(3) $(2) $132
 $
 $
 $
Other comprehensive income (loss)(5)
3
 (1) (134) 
 
 
Balance at end of period$
 $(3) $(2) $
 $
 $
Cash flow hedges           
Balance at beginning of period$4
 $25
 $(1) $
 $
 $
Adoption of accounting standard (A)
(2) 2
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:           
Net change from periodic revaluations(9) (15) 37
 
 
 
Tax benefit (expense)3
 3
 (9) 
 
 
Total Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax(6) (12) 28
 
 
 
Net amount reclassified to earnings           
Aluminum contracts(6)
5
 (8) (2) 
 
 
Interest rate contracts(8)

 (2) 
 
 
 
Nickel contracts(7)
(1) (4) (1) 
 
 
Sub-total4
 (14) (3) 
 
 
Tax (expense) benefit(2)
(1) 3
 1
 
 
 
Total amount reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax(3)
3
 (11) (2) 
 
 
Total Other comprehensive (loss) income(3) (23) 26
 
 
 
Balance at end of period$(1) $4
 $25
 $
 $
 $
            
Accumulated other comprehensive loss$(3,329) $(2,926) $(2,644) $
 $
 $
(1)
These amounts were recorded in Other expense (income), net (see Note E).

(2)
These amounts were included in Provision for income taxes on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations.
(3)
A positive amount indicates a corresponding charge to earnings and a negative amount indicates a corresponding benefit to earnings.
(4)
In all periods presented, no amounts were reclassified to earnings.
(5)
Realized gains and losses were included in Other expense (income), net, on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations.
(6)
These amounts were included in Sales on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations.
(7)
These amounts were included in Cost of goods sold on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations.
(8)
These amounts were included in Interest expense on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations.
K.M. Receivables
Sale of Receivables ProgramPrograms
Arconic hasThe Company maintains an accounts receivables securitization arrangement through a wholly-owned special purpose entity (“SPE”). The Company previously had a second arrangement which terminated on August 30, 2021. The net cash funding from the sale of accounts receivable was neither a use of cash nor a source of cash during 2022 or 2021.
The terminated arrangement was with 3 financial institutions to sell certain customer receivables without recourse on a revolving basis. The sale of such receivables is completed using a bankruptcy remote special purpose entity, which is a consolidated subsidiary of Arconic. This arrangement provides up to a maximum funding of $400 for receivables sold. Arconic maintains a beneficial interest, or a right to collect cash, on the sold receivables that have not been funded (deferred purchase program). On March 30, 2012, Arconic initially sold $304 of customer receivables in exchange for $50 in cash and $254 of deferred purchase program under the arrangement. Arconic has received additionalCompany had $44 net cash funding of $300repayments ($3,55841 in draws and $3,258 in repayments) since the program’s inception, including net cash draws totaling $0 ($600 in draws and $600$85 in repayments) in 2019 and net cash draws totaling $0 ($6002021 in draws and $600 in repayments) in 2018.
As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, the deferred purchase program receivable was $246 and $234, respectively, which was included in Other receivables on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.connection with this arrangement. The deferred purchase program receivable is reduced as collections of the underlying receivables occur; however, as this is a revolving program, the sale of new receivables will result in an increase in the deferred purchase program receivable. The gross amount of receivables sold and total cash collected under this program since its inception was $48,383 and $47,787 respectively. Arconic services the customer receivables for the financial institutions at market rates; therefore, no servicing asset or liability was recorded.
In 2019 and 2018, the gross cash outflows and inflows associated with the deferred purchase program receivable were $6,599 and $6,586 respectively, and $6,375 and $6,328, respectively.
Cash receipts from both customer payments on sold receivables (which arewere cash receipts on the underlying trade receivables that havehad been previously sold in this program) as well assold) and net cash receipts and cash disbursements from draws and repayments under the program arewere presented as cash receipts from sold receivables within investing activities in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows.Flows in 2021.
On January 2, 2020,The current accounts receivables securitization arrangement is one in which the Company, entered intothrough an amendmentSPE, has a receivables purchase agreement (the “Receivables Purchase Agreement”) such that the SPE may sell certain receivables to remove subsidiariesfinancial institutions until the earlier of August 30, 2024 or a termination event. The Receivables Purchase Agreement also contains customary representations and warranties, as well as affirmative and negative covenants. Pursuant to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred receivables, and therefore accounts for these transfers as sales of receivables. This accounts receivable securitization arrangement totaled $325 at both December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 of which $250 was drawn as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. As collateral against the sold receivables, the SPE maintains a certain level of unsold receivables, which were $190 and $79 at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.
The Company sold $1,799 of its receivables without recourse and received cash funding under this program during 2022, resulting in derecognition of the GRP businessreceivables from the saleCompany’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Costs associated with the sales of receivables programare reflected in preparationthe Company’s Statement of Consolidated Operations for the planned Separationperiods in which the sales occur. Cash receipts from sold receivables under the Receivables Purchase Agreement are presented within operating activities in the Statement of Arconic and repurchasedConsolidated Cash Flows.
Other Customer Receivable Sales
In 2022, the remaining $282 unpaidCompany sold $474 of certain customers’ receivables of GRPin exchange for cash (of which $126 was outstanding from customers in a non-cash transaction by reducingat December 31, 2022), the amount of the deferred purchase program receivable.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The following table details theproceeds from which are presented in changes in receivables within operating activities in the allowanceStatement of Consolidated Cash Flows.
In 2021, the Company sold $368 of certain customers’ receivables in exchange for doubtful accounts related to customercash (of which $109 was outstanding from customers at December 31, 2021), the proceeds from which are presented in changes in receivables and other receivables:within operating activities in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows.
 Customer receivables Other receivables
 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Balance at beginning of year$4
 $8
 $13
 $31
 $34
 $32
Provision for doubtful accounts3
 2
 1
 13
 7
 9
Write off of uncollectible accounts(2) (2) (5) (2) (2) (1)
Recoveries of prior write-offs
 
 
 (5) (3) (3)
Other(2) (4) (1) (4) (5) (3)
Balance at end of year$3
 $4
 $8
 $33
 $31
 $34


L.N. Inventories
December 31,2019 2018
Finished goods$671
 $668
Work-in-process1,316
 1,371
Purchased raw materials343
 366
Operating supplies99
 87
Total inventories$2,429
 $2,492

December 31,20222021
Finished goods$490 $478 
Work-in-process748 631 
Purchased raw materials317 256 
Operating supplies54 37 
Total inventories$1,609 $1,402 
At December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the portion of total inventories valued on a LIFO basis was $1,257$441 and $1,292,$331, respectively. If valued on an average-cost basis, total inventories would have been $445$220 and $530$192 higher at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. During 20192022 and 2018,2020, reductions in LIFO inventory quantities caused partial liquidations of the lower cost LIFO inventory base.layers. These liquidations resulted in the recognition of immaterial income amountsexpense of less than $1 in 2019, 2018,2022 and 2017.2020. In 2021, we did not have any LIFO inventory layer liquidations.
In the second quarter
72



O. Properties, Plants, and Inventories to reflect a physical inventory adjustment at 1 plant in the GRP segment (this plant was previously included in the EP&F segment prior to the transfer of the aluminum extrusions operations from the EP&F segment to the GRP segment inEquipment, Net
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Land and land rights(1)
$84 $91 
Structures(1)
986 1,034 
Machinery and equipment3,941 3,932 
5,011 5,057 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization(1)
2,858 2,772 
2,153 2,285 
Construction work-in-progress179 182 
Properties, plants, and equipment, net$2,332 $2,467 
(1)In the first quarter of 2019 - see Note C). While a portion of this charge relates to prior years, the majority relates to 2018. The out-of-period amounts were not material to any interim or annual periods.
M. Properties, Plants, and Equipment, Net
December 31,2019 2018
Land and land rights$128
 $136
Structures:   
Engineered Products and Forgings812
 769
Global Rolled Products1,304
 1,317
Other269
 278
 2,385
 2,364
Machinery and equipment:   
Engineered Products and Forgings3,514
 3,433
Global Rolled Products5,401
 5,356
Other378
 445
 9,293
 9,234
 11,806
 11,734
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization7,074
 6,769
 4,732
 4,965
Construction work-in-progress731
 739
 $5,463
 $5,704

During the second quarter of 2019,2022, the Company updated its five-year strategic plan and determined that there was a declineentered into an agreement to sell the corporate headquarters in Pittsburgh, PA. The proceeds from the forecasted financial performance for the Disks asset group within the EP&F segment. As such, the Company evaluated the recoverabilitysale of the Disks asset group long-lived assets by comparingcorporate headquarters, which closed in June 2022, were $44, excluding $3 of transaction costs, and the carrying value toat the undiscounted cash flowstime of the Disks asset group. The carrying value exceeded the undiscounted cash flows and therefore the Disks asset group long-lived assets were deemed to be impaired. The impairment chargesale was measured as the amount$41. A loss of carrying value in excess of fair value of the long-lived assets, with fair value determined using a DCF model and a combination of sales comparison and cost approach valuation methods including an estimate for economic obsolescence. The impairment charge of $428 recorded in the second quarter of 2019 impacted properties, plants, and equipment; intangible assets; and certain other noncurrent assets by $198, $197, and $33, respectively. The impairment chargeless than $1 was recorded in Restructuring and other charges in the Statement of Consolidated Operations upon finalization of the sale in 2019.
During the second quarter of 2018,2022. The Company entered into a 12-year lease with the Company updated its three-year strategic planpurchaser for a portion of the property.
Depreciation expense related to Properties, plants, and determined that there was a declineequipment recorded in Provision for depreciation and amortization in the forecasted financial performanceStatement of Consolidated Operations was $227, $232, and $236 for the Disks asset group within the EP&F segment. As such, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the long-lived assets by comparing their carrying value of approximately $515 to the estimated undiscounted net cash flows of the Disks asset group, resulting in an estimated fair value in excess of their carrying value ofyears ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.

approximately 13%; thus, there was 0 impairment. There were no indicators of impairment identified for the Disks asset group during the third or fourth quarters of 2018 and, as such, the Company did not evaluate the recoverability of its long-lived assets.
N.P. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table details the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill:
Engine ProductsFastening SystemsEngineered StructuresForged WheelsTotal
Balances at December 31, 2020
Goodwill$2,890 $1,620 $306 $$4,823 
Accumulated impairment losses(719)— (2)— (721)
Goodwill, net2,171 1,620 304 4,102 
Impairment (See Note U)
— (4)— — (4)
Translation and other(22)(9)— — (31)
Balances at December 31, 2021
Goodwill2,868 1,611 306 4,792 
Accumulated impairment losses(719)(4)(2)— (725)
Goodwill, net2,149 1,607 304 4,067 
Translation and other(38)(16)— — (54)
Balances at December 31, 2022
Goodwill2,830 1,595 306 4,738 
Accumulated impairment losses(719)(4)(2)— (725)
Goodwill, net$2,111 $1,591 $304 $$4,013 
 Engineered Products and Forgings Global Rolled Products Total
Balances at December 31, 2017     
Goodwill$4,931
 $351
 $5,282
Accumulated impairment losses(1)
(719) (28) (747)
Goodwill, net4,212
 323
 4,535
Acquisitions and Divestitures (F)(1) 
 (1)
Translation and other(25) (9) (34)
Balances at December 31, 2018     
Goodwill4,905
 342
 5,247
Accumulated impairment losses(719) (28) (747)
Goodwill, net4,186
 314
 4,500
Divestitures (T)
(13) 
 (13)
Translation and other4
 2
 6
Transfer from Engineered Structures to Aluminum Extrusions(110) 110
 
Balances at December 31, 2019     
Goodwill4,786
 454
 5,240
Accumulated impairment losses(719) (28) (747)
Goodwill, net$4,067
 $426
 $4,493

(1)
$25 of fully impaired goodwill related to Latin America Extrusions has been moved to Corporate. See Note B.
In 2017, Arconic recognized an impairmentDuring the 2022 annual review of goodwill in the fourth quarter, management elected to perform qualitative assessments on the Engine Products and Forged Wheels reporting units and performed quantitative impairment tests on the Engineered Structures and Fastening Systems reporting units. The estimated fair values for the Engineered Structures and Fastening Systems reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by approximately 40%; thus, there were no goodwill impairments. Howmet uses a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model to estimate the current fair value of the reporting unit, which is compared to its carrying value, when testing for impairment. Management believes forecasted cash flows are the best indicator of such fair value. A number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the DCF model to forecast operating cash flows, including sales growth, production costs, capital spending, and discount rate. Assumptions can vary among the reporting units. Cash flow forecasts are generally based on approved business unit operating plans for the early years and historical relationships in later years. The WACC rate for the individual reporting units is estimated with the assistance of valuation experts. The annual goodwill impairment tests in the fourth quarters of 2022, 2021, and 2020 indicated that goodwill was not
73


impaired for any of the Company’s reporting units. If actual results or external market factors decline significantly from management’s estimates, future goodwill impairment charges (or the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value without exceeding the total amount of $719 relatedgoodwill allocated to that reporting unit) may be necessary and could be material.
During the first quarter of 2020, we performed a qualitative impairment test of our reporting units as a result of these macroeconomic factors, including Howmet’s market capitalization declining significantly compared to the annual impairment reviewfourth quarter of 2019, equity value of our peer group companies and the overall U.S. stock market significant declines amid market volatility and the onset of the Arconic ForgingsCOVID-19 pandemic and Extrusions business. See Goodwill policyits impact on the aerospace and commercial transportation industries. As a result of this qualitative assessment, the Company performed a quantitative impairment test for the Engineered Structures reporting unit in Note A.the first quarter of 2020 and concluded that although the margin between the fair value of the reporting unit and carrying value had declined from 60% to approximately 15%, it was not impaired. Since the first quarter of 2020, there have been no indicators of impairment identified for the Engineered Structures reporting unit or any other reporting units or indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Other intangible assets were as follows:
December 31, 2022Gross carrying amountAccumulated
amortization
Intangibles, net
Computer software$204 $(173)$31 
Patents and licenses67 (66)
Other intangibles678 (221)457 
Total amortizable intangible assets949 (460)489 
Indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks32 — 32 
Total intangible assets, net$981 $(460)$521 
December 31, 2019
Gross
carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 Intangibles, net
Computer software$744
 $(659) $85
Patents and licenses95
 (93) 2
Other intangibles714
 (175) 539
Total amortizable intangible assets1,553
 (927)
626
Indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks32
 
 32
Total other intangible assets$1,585
 $(927) $658
December 31, 2018
Gross
carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 Intangibles, net
Computer software$768
 $(657) $111
Patents and licenses110
 (107) 3
Other intangibles922
 (149) 773
Total amortizable intangible assets1,800
 (913) 887
Indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks32
 
 32
Total other intangible assets$1,832
 $(913) $919



During the second quarter of 2019, the Company recorded a charge of $197 for intangible asset impairments associated with the Disks long-lived asset group. See Note M for additional details.
December 31, 2021Gross carrying amountAccumulated
amortization
Intangibles, net
Computer software$206 $(175)$31 
Patents and licenses67 (65)
Other intangibles686 (202)484 
Total amortizable intangible assets959 (442)517 
Indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks32 — 32 
Total intangible assets, net$991 $(442)$549 
Computer software consists primarily of software costs associated with an enterprise business solution within Arconic to drive common systems among allsolutions across Howmet's businesses.
Amortization expense related to the intangible assets recorded in Provision for depreciation and amortization in the tables aboveStatement of Consolidated Operations was $36, $36, and $40 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017 was $70, $81, and $71,2020, respectively, and is expected to be in the range of approximately $50$34 to $60$39 annually from 20202023 to 2024.2027.
O.Q. Leases
Operating lease cost, which includesincluded short-term leases and variable lease payments and approximatesapproximated cash paid, was $145, $144,$61, $63, and $113$67 in 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively.
Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet were as follows:
December 31,20222021
Right-of-use assets classified in Other noncurrent assets$111 $108 
Current portion of lease liabilities classified in Other current liabilities
$32 $33 
Long-term portion of lease liabilities classified in Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits83 81 
Total lease liabilities$115 $114 
 December 31, 2019
Right-of-use assets classified in Other noncurrent assets$252
  
Current portion of lease liabilities classified in Other current liabilities
71
Long-term portion of lease liabilities classified in Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits194
Total lease liabilities$265
74


Future minimum contractual operating lease obligations were as follows:
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
2019$
 $94
202081
 74
202162
 54
202246
 40
202334
 30
202424
 
Thereafter70
 87
Total lease payments$317
 $379
Less: Imputed interest(52)  
Present value of lease liabilities$265
  

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations in 2019 were $41. The weighted-average remaining lease term and weighted-average discount ratefollows at December 31, 2019 was 6 years2022:
2023$39 
202429 
202518 
202614 
202710 
Thereafter24 
Total lease payments$134 
Less: Imputed interest(19)
Present value of lease liabilities$115 
December 31,202220212020
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations (O)
$34 $16 $35 
Weighted-average remaining lease term in years666
Weighted-average discount rate5.4 %5.4 %5.6 %
R. Debt
Debt.
December 31,20222021
5.125% Notes, due 2024$1,081 $1,150 
6.875% Notes, due 2025600 600 
5.900% Notes, due 2027625 625 
6.750% Bonds, due 2028300 300 
3.000% Notes, due 2029700 700 
5.950% Notes, due 2037625 625 
4.750% Iowa Finance Authority Loan, due 2042250 250 
Other(1)
(19)(18)
4,162 4,232 
Less: amount due within one year— 
 Total long-term debt$4,162 $4,227 
(1)Includes various financing arrangements related to subsidiaries, unamortized debt discounts and 6.0%, respectively.

P. Debt
Long-Term Debt.
December 31,2019 2018
1.63% Convertible Notes, due 2019$
 $403
6.150% Notes, due 20201,000
 1,000
5.40% Notes, due 20211,250
 1,250
5.87% Notes, due 2022627
 627
5.125% Notes, due 20241,250
 1,250
5.90% Notes, due 2027625
 625
6.75% Bonds, due 2028300
 300
5.95% Notes due 2037625
 625
Iowa Finance Authority Loan, due 2042 (4.75%)250
 250
Other(1)
(18) (29)
 5,909
 6,301
Less: amount due within one year1,003
 405
 $4,906
 $5,896
(1)unamortized debt issuance costs related to outstanding notes and bonds listed in the table above.
Includes various financing arrangements related to subsidiaries, unamortized debt discounts related to outstanding notes and bonds listed in the table above, an equity option related to the convertible notes due in 2019, and unamortized debt issuance costs.
The principal amount of long-term debt maturing in each of the next five years is $1,000$1,081 in 2020, $1,2502024, $600 in 2021, $6272025, $625 in 2022, $02027, and no debt maturities in each of 2023 and $1,250 in 2024.2026.
Public Debt. On October 15, 2019,In the 1.63% Convertible Notes ("the Notes") matured in accordance with their termssecond and fourth quarters of 2022, the Company repaidrepurchased in cash on the maturity date theopen market approximately $69 aggregate outstanding principal amount of theits 5.125% Notes due October 2024 (the “5.125% Notes”) and paid approximately $71, including an early termination premium of approximately $403 together$2, which was recorded in Loss on debt redemption in the Statement of Consolidated Operations. In January 2023, the Company repurchased approximately $26 aggregate principal amount of additional 5.125% Notes in the open market.
In the third and fourth quarters of 2021, the Company repurchased an additional $100 aggregate principal amount of its 5.125% Notes in the open market and paid approximately $111, including an early termination premium and accrued interest of approximately $10 and $1, respectively, which were recorded in Loss on debt redemption and Interest expense, net, respectively, in the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
On September 2, 2021, the Company completed a cash tender offer and repurchased approximately $600 aggregate principal amount of its 6.875% Notes due 2025 (the “6.875% Notes”). The amount of tender premium and accrued interest associated with accruedthe notes accepted for settlement were $105 and unpaid interest, pursuant$14, respectively, which were recorded in Loss on debt redemption and Interest expense, net, respectively, in the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
75


On September 1, 2021, the Company completed an offering of $700 aggregate principal amount of 3.000% Notes due 2029, the proceeds of which were used to fund the terms of the Notes.cash tender offer noted above and to pay related transaction fees, including applicable premiums and expenses.
During the first quarter of 2018,On May 3, 2021, the Company completed the early redemption of itsall the remaining outstanding 5.72% Notes due in 2019, with$476 aggregate principal amount of $500, for $518its 5.870% Notes due 2022 (the “5.870% Notes”) and paid an aggregate of $503, including $5 of accrued interest. The Company also incurred an early termination premium and other costs of $23, which was recorded in cash including accrued and unpaid interest. As a result, the Company recorded a charge of $19 in Interest expense Loss on debt redemption in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations for 2018 primarily for the premium paid on the early redemption of these notes in excess of their carrying value.Operations.
During the second quarter of 2017, the Company announced 3 separate cash tender offers by the Investment Banks for the purchase of the Company’s 6.50% Bonds due 2018 (the “6.50% Bonds”), 6.75% Notes due 2018 (the “6.75% Notes”), and 5.72% Notes due 2019 (the “5.72% Notes”), up to a maximum purchase amount of $1,000 aggregate principal amount of notes, subject to certain conditions. The Investment Banks purchased notes totaling $805 aggregate principal amount, including $150 aggregate principal amount of 6.50% Bonds, $405 aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Notes, and $250 aggregate principal amount of 5.72% Notes.
Also, during the second quarter of 2017, the Company agreed to acquire the notes from the Investment Banks for $409 in cash plus its remaining investment in Alcoa Corporation common stock (12,958,767 shares valued at $35.91 per share) for total consideration of $874 including accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a charge of $58 ($27 in cash) primarily for the premium for the early redemption of the notes, a benefit of $8 for the proceeds of a related interest rate swap agreement, and a charge of $2 for legal fees associated with the transaction in Interest expense, and recorded a gain of $167 in Other expense (income), net in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations for the Debt-for-Equity Exchange.
Finally, during the second quarter of 2017,On January 15, 2021 the Company completed the early redemption of all the remaining $361 of its remaining outstanding 6.50% Bonds,5.400% Notes due 2021 (the 5.400% Notes) at par and paid $5 in accrued interest.
On May 21, 2020, the Company completed a cash tender offer and repurchased $589 and $151 of principal amount of the 5.400% Notes and its 5.870% Notes, respectively. The amount of early tender premium and accrued interest associated with the notes accepted for early settlement were $24 and $4, respectively, which were recorded in Loss on debt redemption and Interest expense, net, respectively, in the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
On April 24, 2020, the Company completed an offering of $1,200 aggregate principal amount of $100,6.875% Notes, the proceeds of which have been used to fund the May 2020 cash tender offers noted above and itsto pay related transaction fees, including applicable premiums and expenses, with the remaining outstanding 6.75% Notes,amount to be used for general corporate purposes. The Company incurred deferred financing costs of $14 associated with aggregate principal amountthe issuance in the second quarter of $345, for $479 in cash including accrued and unpaid interest. As a result of2020.
On April 6, 2020, the Company completed the early redemption of all $1,000 of its 6.150% Notes due 2020 (the “6.150% Notes”) and the 6.50% Bondsearly partial redemption of $300 of its 5.400% Notes. Holders of the 6.150% Notes were paid an aggregate of $1,020 and 6.75%holders of the 5.400% Notes were paid an aggregate of $315, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but not including, the redemption date. The Company incurred early termination premium and accrued interest of $35 and $17, respectively, which were recorded a charge of $24 in Loss on debt redemption and Interest expense, net, respectively, in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations for the premium paid for the early redemption of these notes in excess of their carrying value.Operations.
The Company has the option to redeem certain of its Notesnotes and Bondsbonds in whole or part, at any time at a redemption price equal to the greater of principal amount or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments, discounted using a defined treasury rate plus a spread, plus in either case accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.

Credit Facilities.Facility. On July 25, 2014, Arconic entered into aSeptember 28, 2021, the Company amended and restated its Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement with(as so amended and restated, the “Credit Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this “Credit Facility” section but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement provides a syndicate of lenders and issuers named therein, which provides for a$1,000 senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). By an Extension Request and Amendment Letter dated as that matures on September 28, 2026, unless extended or earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of June 5, 2015, the maturity dateCredit Agreement. Howmet may make two one-year extension requests during the term of the Credit Facility, was extended to July 25, 2020. On September 16, 2016, Arconic entered into Amendment No. 1subject to the Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement to permit the Separation of Alcoa and to amend certain terms oflender consent requirements set forth in the Credit Agreement, including the replacement of the existing financial covenant with a leverage ratio and reduction of total commitments available from $4,000 to $3,000. On June 29, 2018, Arconic entered into Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment No. 2”) to amend and restate the Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement. The Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, as so amended and restated, is herein referred to as the “Credit Agreement.”
The Credit Agreement provides a $3,000 Credit Facility, the proceeds of which are to be used to provide working capital or for other general corporate purposes of Arconic. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, Arconicthe Company may from time to time request increases in lender commitments under the Credit Facility, not to exceed $500 in aggregate principal amount, and may also request the issuance of letters of credit, subject to a letter of credit sublimit of $1,000$500 of the Credit Facility. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, Arconic shall not permit the ratio of Consolidated Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDA (each as defined in the Credit Agreement) as of the end of each fiscal quarter for the period of the four fiscal quarters most recently ended, to be greater than 4.50 to 1.00, which maximum level will step down successively to 4.00 to 1.00 on December 31, 2018, and to 3.50 to 1.00 on December 31, 2019 and thereafter.
The Credit Agreement includes additional covenants, including, among others, (a) limitations on Arconic’s ability to incur liens securing indebtedness for borrowed money, (b) limitations on Arconic’s ability to consummate a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of its assets, and (c) limitations on Arconic’s ability to change the nature of its business. As of December 31, 2019, Arconic was in compliance with all such covenants.
The Credit Facility matures on June 29, 2023, unless extended or earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Agreement. Arconic may make 2 one-year extension requests during the term of the Credit Facility, subject to the lender consent requirements set forth in the Credit Agreement. Under the provisions of the Credit Agreement, Arconic will pay a fee of 0.25% per annum (basedbased on Arconic’sHowmet’s current long-term debt ratings)ratings, Howmet pays an annual fee of 0.23% of the total commitment to maintain the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility is unsecured and amounts payable under it will rank pari passu with all other unsecured, unsubordinated indebtedness of Arconic.Howmet. Borrowings under the Credit Facility may be denominated in U.S. dollars or euros. On February 13, 2023, the Company amended the Credit Agreement to replace LIBOR with Term SOFR as the reference rate for U.S. dollar-denominated loans. Loans under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at a base rate or, in the case of U.S. dollar-denominated loans, a rate equal to LIBOR,Term SOFR plus adjustment or, in the case of euro-denominated loans, the Euro inter-bank offered rate (“EURIBOR”), plus, in each case, an applicable margin based on the credit ratings of Arconic’sHowmet’s outstanding senior unsecured long-term debt. TheBased on Howmet’s current long-term debt ratings, the applicable margin on base rate loans and LIBOR loans willwould be 0.50% and 1.50%0.40% per annum respectively,and the applicable margin on Term SOFR loans and EURIBOR loans would be 1.40% per annum. The applicable margin is subject to change based on Arconic’s currentthe Company’s long-term debt ratings. Loans may be prepaid without premium or penalty, subject to customary breakage costs.
The obligation of ArconicHowmet to pay amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility may be accelerated upon the occurrence of an “Event of Default” as defined in the Credit Agreement. Such Events of Default include, among others, (a) non-payment of obligations; (b) breach of any representation or warranty in any material respect; (c) non-performance of covenants and obligations; (d) with respect to other indebtedness in a principal amount in excess of $100, million, a default thereunder that causes such indebtedness to become due prior to its stated maturity or a default in the payment at maturity of any principal of such indebtedness; (e) the bankruptcy or insolvency of Arconic;Howmet; and (f) a change in control of Arconic.Howmet.
76


Under the Credit Agreement, the Company’s ratio of Consolidated Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDA as of the end of each fiscal quarter for the period of the four fiscal quarters of the Company most recently ended, is required to be no greater than 3.50 to 1.00.
During the Covenant Relief Period, which ended on December 31, 2022, the Company was required to maintain a Consolidated Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDA ratio of no greater than 5.00 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter for the period of four fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2021, stepping down as of the end of each fiscal quarter to 3.75 to 1.00 as of December 31, 2022. In addition, during the Covenant Relief Period, common stock dividends and share repurchases (see Note J) were permitted only if no loans under the Credit Agreement were outstanding at the time and were limited to an aggregate amount not to exceed $500 during the year ended December 31, 2022. Common stock dividends and share repurchases were $442 during the year ended December 31, 2022. Following the end of the Covenant Relief Period, the restriction on common stock dividends and share repurchases under the Credit Agreement, along with certain covenants, no longer applies.
The Credit Agreement includes additional covenants, including, among others, (a) limitations on Howmet’s ability to incur liens securing indebtedness for borrowed money, (b) limitations on Howmet’s ability to consummate a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of its assets, and (c) limitations on Howmet’s ability to change the nature of its business.
There were 0no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement at December 31, 20192022 and 20182021, and 0no amounts were borrowed during 2019, 2018,2022, 2021 or 20172020 under the Credit Facility.Agreement. At December 31, 2022, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement. Availability under the Credit Agreement could be reduced in future periods if the Company fails to maintain the required ratios referenced above.
In addition to the Credit Agreement, above, Arconic has a number ofthe Company had several other credit agreements that provideprovided a combined borrowing capacity of $640 as of December 31, 2019, and all of which is due to expireexpired in 2020. The purpose of any borrowingsIn 2020, nothing was borrowed or repaid under these credit arrangements is to provide for working capital requirements and for other general corporate purposes. The covenants contained in all these arrangements are the same as the Credit Agreement. In 2019, 2018, and 2017, Arconic borrowed and repaid $400, $600, and $810, respectively, under the respective credit arrangements. The weighted-average interest rate and weighted-average days outstanding of the respective borrowings during 2019, 2018, and 2017 were 3.7%, 3.3%, and 2.6%, respectively, and 49 days, 46 days, and 46 days, respectively.
Short-Term Debt. At December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, short-term debt was $31zero and $29, respectively. These amounts included $29 and $29 at December 31, 2019 and 2018,$5, respectively, substantially all of which related to accounts payable settlement arrangements with certain vendors and third-party intermediaries. These arrangements provide that, at the vendor’s request, the third-party intermediary advances the amount of the scheduled payment to the vendor, less an appropriate discount, before the scheduled payment date, and ArconicHowmet makes payment to the third-party intermediary on the date stipulated in accordance with the commercial terms negotiated with its vendors. ArconicHowmet records imputed interest related to these arrangements in Interest expense, onnet in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations.

Commercial Paper. Arconic had 0 outstanding commercial paper at December 31, 2019 and 2018. In 2019, Arconic did not issue commercial paper. In 2018, the average outstanding commercial paper was $49. Commercial paper matures at various times within one year and had an annual weighted average interest rate of 2.5% during 2018.
Q.S. Other Financial Instruments
Fair Value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (i) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (ii) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
The carrying values of Cash and cash equivalents, Restrictedrestricted cash, Derivatives, Noncurrentderivatives, noncurrent receivables, and Short-term debt included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate their fair value. The Company holds exchange-traded fixed income securities which are considered available-for-sale securities thatand are carried at fair value which is based on quoted market prices whichprices. The aforementioned securities are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.hierarchy and are included in Other noncurrent assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of Long-term debt, less amount due within one year was based on quoted market prices for public debt and on interest rates that are currently available to ArconicHowmet for issuance of debt with similar terms and maturities for non-public debt. The fair value amounts for all Long-term debt were classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
 2019 2018
December 31,
Carrying
value
 
Fair
value
 
Carrying
value
 
Fair
value
Long-term debt, less amount due within one year$4,906
 $5,337
 $5,896
 $5,873
77


 20222021
December 31,Carrying
value
Fair
value
Carrying
value
Fair
value
Long-term debt, less amounts due within one year$4,162 $4,059 $4,227 $4,707 
Restricted cash was $55 (see Note S), $6,$1, $2, and $4$1 in 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively, and was recorded in Prepaid expenses and other current assets onin the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
R.T. Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest and income taxes for both continuing and discontinued operations was as follows:
202220212020
Interest, net of amounts capitalized$224 $267 $401 
Income taxes, net of amounts refunded$50 $53 $(33)
 2019 2018 2017
Interest, net of amount capitalized$340
 $391
 $508
Income taxes, net of amount refunded$122
 $74
 $118
Noncash FinancingThe Company incurred capital expenditures which remain unpaid at December 31, 2022, 2021, and Investing Activities. On October 2, 2017, all outstanding 24,975,978 depositary shares (each depositary share representing a 1/10th interest in a share2020 of the mandatory convertible preferred stock) were converted at a rate of 1.56996 into 39,211,286 common shares; 24,022 depositary shares were previously tendered for early conversion into 31,420 shares of Arconic common stock. No gain or loss was recognized associated with this equity transaction (see Note H).
In the second quarter of 2017, the Company completed a Debt-for-Equity Exchange with the Investment Banks for the remaining portion of Arconic’s retained interest in Alcoa Corporation common stock for a portion of the Company’s outstanding notes held by the Investment Banks for $465 including accrued$55, $49, and unpaid interest (see Note P).
S. Acquisitions$50, respectively, and Divestitures
2019 Divestitures. On May 31, 2019, Arconic sold a small additive manufacturing facility within the EP&F segment for $1will result in cash which resulted in a loss of $13 recorded in Restructuring and other chargesoutflows within investing activities in the Statement of Consolidated Operations. The sale is subject to certain post-closing adjustments.Cash Flows in subsequent periods.

U. Divestitures
2021 Divestiture
On AugustMarch 15, 2019, Arconic sold inventories and properties, plants, and equipment related to a small energy business within2021, the EP&F segment for $13 in cash. Arconic recognized a charge of $10 related to inventory impairment and recorded the charge in Cost of goods sold in the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
On October 30, 2019, ArconicCompany reached an agreement to sell its hard alloy extrusionsa small manufacturing plant in South Korea for $61France within the Fastening Systems segment, which resulted in cash, subjecta charge of $4 related to working capital and other adjustments. The operating results and assets and liabilitiesthe non-cash impairment of this plant are included in the GRP segment. The sale transaction is expected to closenet book value of the business, primarily goodwill, in the first quarter of 2020, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. Arconic expects to recognize a gain of $25 to $30 upon the sale, whichwill be recorded in Restructuring and other charges in the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
On December 1, 2019, Arconic completed the sale of its forgings business in the United Kingdom for $64 in cash, which resulted in a loss on sale of $462021 which was recorded in Restructuring and other charges in the Statement of Consolidated Operations. OfOn June 1, 2021, the Company completed the sale for $10 (of which $8 of cash proceedswas received $53in the second quarter of 2021). In the third quarter of 2022, $1 was recorded as Restricted cash within Prepaid expensesreceived, and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at Decemberremaining $1 in escrow is expected to be received in the third quarter of 2023.
2020 Divestiture
On January 31, 2019 as its use is subject2020, the Company reached an agreement to restriction bysell a small manufacturing plant in the U.K. pension authority until certain U.K. pension plan changes have been made and approved. The forgings business primarily produces steel, titanium, and nickel based forged componentswithin the Engineered Structures segment for aerospace, mining, and off-highway markets and its operating results and assets and liabilities are included in the EP&F segment. The sale remains subject to certain post-closing adjustments. This business generated sales of $116, $131, and $127 in 2019, 2018, and 2017, and had 540 employees at the time of divestiture.
On February 1, 2020, Arconic sold its aluminum rolling mill in Itapissuma, Brazil for $50$12 in cash, subject to working capital and other adjustments. The rolling mill produces specialty foil and sheet products and its operating results and assets and liabilities were included in the GRP segment.therefore was classified as held for sale. As a result of entering into the agreement, to sell in August 2019, Arconic recognized a charge of $53 in 2019$12 was recognized related to a non-cash impairment of the net book value of the business, primarily properties, plants, and equipment. This chargeequipment in the first quarter of 2020, which was recorded in Restructuring and other charges in the Statement of Consolidated Operations. This business generated sales of $143, $179, and $162 in 2019, 2018, and 2017 respectively, and had 513 employees at the time of divestiture.
2018 Divestitures. On April 2, 2018, Arconic completedAs the sale ofdid not close, the Latin America extrusions businessCompany changed the classification from held for sale to a subsidiary of Hydro Extruded Solutions ASheld for $2, following the settlement of post-closing and other adjustments in December 2018. As a result of entering into the agreement to sell the Latin America extrusions business in December 2017, a charge of $41 was recognized in Restructuring and other chargesuse in the Statementsecond quarter of Consolidated Operations related to the non-cash impairment2020 and recorded these assets at their lower of the net bookcarrying value (assuming no initial reclassification for held for sale was made) or fair value. The result was a reversal of the business and an additional charge of $2$7 related to a post-closing adjustment was recorded in 2018. The operating results and assets and liabilities of the business were includednon-cash impairment in the TCSsegment at the time of divestiture, but were transferred to Corporate in connection with a segment change (see Note B). This business generated sales of $25 and $115 in 2018 and 2017 and had 612 employees at the time of divestiture.
On July 31, 2018, the Company announced that it had initiated a sale process of BCS, as part of the Company’s then ongoing strategy and portfolio review. In the firstsecond quarter of 2019, the Company decided to no longer pursue the sale of BCS.
On October 31, 2018, the Company sold its Texarkana, Texas rolling mill and cast house, which had a combined net book value of $63, to Ta Chen International, Inc. for $302 in cash, including the settlement of post-closing adjustments, plus additional contingent consideration of up to $50. The contingent consideration relates to the achievement of various milestones within 36 months of the transaction closing date associated with operationalizing the rolling mill equipment. The operating results and assets and liabilities of the business were included in the GRP segment. The Texarkana rolling mill facility had previously been idle since late 2009. In early 2016, the Company restarted the Texarkana cast house to meet demand for aluminum slab. As part of the agreement, the Company will continue to produce aluminum slab at the facility for a period of 18months through a lease back of the cast house building and equipment, after which time, Ta Chen may perform toll processing of metal for the Company for a period of six months. The Company will supply Ta Chen with cold-rolled aluminum coil during this 24-month period.
The sale of the rolling mill and cast house had been accounted for separately. The gain on the sale of the rolling mill of $154, including the fair value of contingent consideration of $5 was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018. In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company received additional contingent consideration of $20 and recorded a gain.2020. These amountscharges were recorded in Restructuring and other charges in the Statement of Consolidated Operations. The Company continues to reevaluate its estimate of the remaining $25 of contingent consideration to which it will be entitled at the end of each reporting period and will recognize any changes thereto in the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
The Company had continuing involvement related to the lease back of the cast house. As a result, in 2018, the Company continued to treat the cast house building and equipment that it sold to Ta Chen as owned and therefore reflected the following balances in its Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2018: assets of $24 in Properties, plants, and equipment, net; cash proceeds of $119 in Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits (which included a deferred gain of $95); and a deferred tax asset of $22 in Other noncurrent assets. In conjunction with the adoption of the new lease accounting standard (see Note A), the Company's continuing involvement no longer requires deferral of the recognition of the cast house sale. As such, the cash

proceeds, fixed assets, and deferred tax asset related to the cast house were reclassified to Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) as a cumulative effect of an accounting change.
On December 31, 2018, as part of the Company’s then ongoing strategy and portfolio review, Arconic completed the sale of its forgings business in Hungary to Angstrom Automotive Group LLC for $2, which resulted in a loss of $43 recorded in Restructuring and other charges in the Statement of Consolidated Operations. While owned by Arconic, the operating results and assets and liabilities of the business were included in the EP&F segment. This business generated sales of $32 and $38 in 2018 and 2017, respectively, and had 180 employees at the time of the divestiture.
2017 Divestitures. In March 2017, Arconic completed the sale of its rolling mill in Italy to Slim Aluminium. While owned by Arconic, the operating results and assets and liabilities of the Fusina, Italy rolling mill were included in the GRP segment. As part of the transaction, Arconic injected $10 of cash into the business and provided a third-party guarantee with a fair value of $5 related to Slim Aluminium’s environmental remediation. The Company recorded a loss on the sale of $60, which was recorded in Restructuring and other charges on the Statement of Consolidated Operations in 2017. The rolling mill generated sales of approximately $54 in 2017 and had approximately 312 employees.
2014 Acquisitions. In November 2014, Arconic acquired Firth Rixson. The purchase price included an earn-out agreement that required Arconic to make earn-out payments up to an aggregate maximum amount of $150 through December 31, 2020 upon certain conditions. This earn-out was contingent on the Firth Rixson forgings business in Savannah, Georgia achieving certain identified financial targets through December 31, 2020. During 2016, management determined that payment of the maximum amount was not probable based on the forecasted financial performance of this location. Therefore, the fair value of this liability was reduced by $56 with a corresponding credit to Other expense (income), net on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations. During 2017, management determined that payment of the remaining amount of the contingent liability was not probable based on the forecasted financial performance of this location. Therefore, the fair value of this liability was reduced by $81 to 0 at December 31, 2017 with a corresponding credit to Other expense (income), net on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations. The fair value of this liability has remained at 0 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 based on the forecasted financial performance of this location.
T.V. Contingencies and Commitments
Contingencies
Environmental Matters. ArconicHowmet participates in environmental assessments and cleanups at more than 10030 locations. These include owned or operating facilities and adjoining properties, previously owned or operatingoperated facilities and adjoining properties, and waste sites, including Superfund (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)(“CERCLA”)) sites.
A liability is recorded for environmental remediation when a cleanup program becomes probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. As assessments and cleanups proceed, the liability is adjusted based on progress made in determining the extent of remedial actions and related costs. The liability can change substantially due to factors such as the nature and extent of contamination, changes in remedial requirements, and technological changes, among others.
Arconic’sThe Company's remediation reserve balance was $230$16 and $15 at December 31, 20192022 and $266 at December 31, 20182021, respectively, and was recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (of which $94 and $81, respectively, were$6 was classified as a current liability)liability for both periods), and reflects the most probable costs to remediate identified environmental conditions for which costs can be reasonably estimated. Payments related to remediation expenses applied against the reserve were $65$4 and $2 in 20192022 and $32 in 20182021, respectively, and included expenditures currently mandated, as well as those not required by any regulatory authority or third party. The higher payments in 2019 compared with 2018 reflect the start
78


Included in annual operating expenses are the recurring costs of managing hazardous substances and environmental programs. These costs are estimated to be approximatelyless than 1% or less of Cost of goods sold.
The following discussion provides details regarding the current status of the most significant remediation reserves related to a current Arconic site.
Massena West, NY—Arconic has an ongoing remediation project related to the Grasse River, which is adjacent to Arconic’s Massena plant site. Many years ago, it was determined that sediments and fish in the river contain varying levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The project, which was selected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in a Record of Decision issued in April 2013, is aimed at capping PCB contaminated sediments with concentration in excess of one part per million in the main channel of the river and dredging PCB contaminated sediments in the near-shore areas where total PCBs exceed one part per million. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the reserve balances associated with this matter were $171 and $198, respectively. In the first quarter of 2019, Arconic received approval from the EPA of its final remedial design which

is now under construction and is expected to be completed in 2022. During the second quarter of 2019, Arconic recorded a charge of $25 due to changes required in the remedial design and post-construction monitoring. As the project proceeds, the liability may be updated due to factors such as changes in remedial requirements, site restoration costs, and ongoing operation and maintenance costs, among others.
Tax. Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, entered into between the Company and Alcoa Corporation in connection with the Separation of Alcoa, the Company shares responsibility with Alcoa Corporation for, and Alcoa Corporation has agreed to partially indemnify the Company with respect to the following matter.
As previouslypreviously reported, in July 2013, following a Spanish corporate income tax audit covering the 2006 through 2009 tax years, an assessment was received mainly disallowing certain interest deductions claimed by a Spanish consolidated tax group owned by the Company. In August 2013, theThe Company filed an appeal ofappealed this assessment in Spain’sto Spain's Central Tax Administrative Court, and subsequently to Spain's National Court, each of which was denied in January 2015. Arconic filed another appeal in Spain’s National Court in March 2015 which was denied in July 2018. The National Court’s decision requires the assessment for the 2006 through 2009 tax years to be reissued to take into account the outcome of the 2003 to 2005 audit which was closed in 2017. denied.
The Company estimatesthen appealed the revised assessmentdecision to be $172 (€154), including interest.
the Supreme Court of Spain. In March 2019,November 2020, the Supreme Court of Spain acceptedrendered a decision in favor of the Company's petition to reviewtaxpayer, removing the National Court’sassessment in its entirety. The decision is final and cannot be further appealed.
As a result of the favorable decision, in the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company has filedreleased an income tax reserve, including interest, of $64 (€54), which was recorded in Provision (benefit) for income taxes in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, that was previously established in the third quarter of 2018. In addition, the Company reversed a formal appealcombined indemnification receivable of $53 (€45) for Alcoa Corporation's 49% share and Arconic Corporation's 33.66% share of the assessment. The Supreme Court is reviewingtotal reserve, which was recorded in Other expense, net in the assessment on its meritsConsolidated Statement of Operations, that were previously established pursuant to the October 31, 2016 and will render a final decision. InMarch 31, 2020 Tax Matters Agreements, respectively. As of the eventend of 2020, the Company receives an unfavorable ruling fromno longer has a balance recorded for this matter.
Indemnified Matters. The Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated October 31, 2016, that the Supreme Court of Spain, a portion ofCompany entered into with Alcoa Corporation in connection with the assessment may be offset with existing net operating losses and tax credits available to the Spanish consolidated tax group, which would be sharedAlcoa Inc. Separation Transaction, provides for cross-indemnities between the Company and Alcoa Corporation as provided for in the Tax Matters Agreement.
In the third quarter of 2018, Arconic established an income tax reserveclaims subject to indemnification. The Separation and an indemnification receivable representing Alcoa Corporation’s 49% share of the liability. As of the end of 2019, the balances of the reserve, including interest, and the receivable are $59 million (€53 million) and $29 million (€26 million), respectively.
Additionally, while the tax years 2010 through 2013 are closed to audit, it is possibleDistribution Agreement, dated March 31, 2020, that the Company may receive assessmentsentered into with Arconic Corporation in connection with the Arconic Inc. Separation Transaction, provides for tax years subsequentcross-indemnities between the Company and Arconic Corporation for claims subject to 2013. Anyindemnification. Among other claims that are covered by these indemnities, Arconic Corporation indemnifies the Company (f/k/a Arconic Inc. and f/k/a Alcoa Inc.) for all potential assessment for an individual tax year is not expected to be material toliabilities associated with the Company’s consolidated operations.
Reynobond PE. As previously reported, on June 13, 2017,fire that occurred at the Grenfell Tower in London, U.K. caught fire resulting in fatalities, injuries and damage. A French subsidiary of Arconic,on June 14, 2017 (“Grenfell Fire”), including the following:
(i) Regulatory Investigations. Arconic Architectural Products SAS (AAP SAS),("AAP SAS") (now a subsidiary of Arconic Corporation) supplied a product, Reynobond PE to its customer a cladding system fabricator, whichwho used the product as one component of the overall cladding system on Grenfell Tower. The fabricator supplied its portion of the cladding system to the façade installer, who then completed and installed the system under the direction of the general contractor. Neither Arconic nor AAP SAS was involved in the design or installation of the system used at the Grenfell Tower, nor did it have a role in any other aspect of the building’s refurbishment or original design. Regulatory investigationsInvestigations into the overall Grenfell Tower matterFire are being conducted, including a criminal investigation by the London Metropolitan Police Service (the “Police”),and a Public Inquiry by the British government and a consumer protection inquiry by a French public authority. The Public Inquiry was announced by the U.K. Prime Minister on June 15, 2017 and subsequently was authorized to examine the circumstances leading up to and surrounding the Grenfell Tower fire in order to make findings of fact and recommendations to the U.K. Government on matters such as the design, construction and modification of the building, the role of relevant public authorities and contractors, the implications of the fire for the adequacy and enforcement of relevant regulations, arrangements in place for handling emergencies and the handling of concerns from residents, among other things. Hearings for Phase 1 of the Public Inquiry began on May 21, 2018 and concluded on December 12, 2018. Phase 2 hearings of the Public Inquiry began in early 2020, following(regarding which a final report will be written and subsequently published. AAP SAS is participating as a Core Participant inparticipant). (ii) United Kingdom Litigation. On December 23, 2020, survivors and estates of decedents of the Public InquiryGrenfell Fire and is also cooperating withemergency responders filed suit against 23 defendants, including the ongoing parallel investigation byCompany. No substantive allegations or requests for relief have been provided. The suits are stayed until the Police. The Company no longer sells the PE product for architectural use on buildings. Given the preliminary nature of these investigations and the uncertainty of potential future litigation, the Company cannot reasonably estimate at this time the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the possible loss or range of losses in the event of an unfavorable outcome.next case management conference, which will be scheduled after April 27, 2023. (iii)
Behrens et al. v. Arconic Inc. et al. As previously reported, on June 6, 2019, 247 plaintiffs comprised of survivors and estates of decedents of the Grenfell Tower fire filed a complaint against “Arconic Inc., Alcoa Inc. and Arconic Architectural Products, LLC” (collectively, for purposes of the description of such proceeding, the “Arconic Defendants”), as well as Saint-Gobain Corporation, d/b/a Celotex and Whirlpool Corporation, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The complaint alleges claims under Pennsylvania state law for products liability and wrongful death related to the fire. In particular, the plaintiffs allege that the Arconic Defendants knowingly supplied a dangerous product (Reynobond PE) for installation on the Grenfell Tower despite knowing that Reynobond PE was unfit for use above a certain height. The Arconic Defendants removed the case to the (United States District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaPennsylvania). On June 6, 2019, 247 survivors and estates of decedents of the GrenfellFire filed a complaint against Arconic Inc., Alcoa Inc. and Arconic Architectural Products, LLC (now a subsidiary of Arconic Corporation), among others, for product liability and wrongful death. The plaintiffs seek monetary damages exceeding $75,000 (amount not in millions) for each plaintiff. On September 16, 2020, the court dismissed the U.S. case, determining that the U.K. is the appropriate jurisdiction for the case. The plaintiffsappealed that decision. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal on June 19, 2019.July 8, 2022, and denied a petition for a rehearing on October 7, 2022. On August 29, 2019,January 5, 2023, the Arconic Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on the bases, among other things, that: (i) the case should be heardplaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United Kingdom, not the United States; (ii) thereU.S. Supreme Court, which is no jurisdiction over necessary parties; and (iii) Pennsylvania productscurrently pending. (iv)

liability law does not apply to manufacture and sale of product overseas. On December 23, 2019, the Court issued an order denying the motion to dismiss the complaint on bases (ii) and (iii) and suggesting a procedure for limited discovery followed by further briefing on those subjects. Discovery is ongoing on defendants’ motion to have the case dismissed in favor of a UK forum (forum non conveniens). On January 23, 2020, the Court ordered that the parties complete discovery relating to forum non conveniens by March 16, 2020, and that briefing conclude on April 13, 2020. The Court will hold oral argument on this motion on May 7, 2020. Given the preliminary nature of this matter and the uncertainty of litigation, the Company cannot reasonably estimate at this time the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the possible loss or range of losses in the event of an unfavorable outcome.
Howard v. Arconic Inc. et al. As previously reported, a purported class action complaint related to the Grenfell Tower fire was filed on August 11, 2017 in the (United States District Court for the Western District of PennsylvaniaPennsylvania). In 2017, two purported class actions were filed against Arconic Inc., Klaus Kleinfeld and Klaus Kleinfeld. Aother former Arconic Inc. executives and directors, and certain banks. The actions, which later were consolidated, allege violations of the federal securities laws relating to the Grenfell Fire. On June 23, 2021, the court ruled that certain claims related purportedto a particular registration statement, other SEC filings, product brochures and websites can proceed and dismissed all other claims with prejudice. On December 2, 2022, the court issued an initial case management order, setting forth deadlines for class action complaint was filed in the certification briefing and discovery.Discovery has begun and is ongoing. (v) Raul v. Albaugh, et al. (United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on September 15, 2017, under the caption Delaware)Sullivan v. Arconic Inc. et al., against Arconic Inc., three former Arconic executives, several current and former Arconic directors, and banks that acted as underwriters for Arconic’s September 18, 2014 preferred stock offering (the “Preferred Offering”). The plaintiff in Sullivan had previously filed a purported class action against the same defendants on July 18, 2017 in the Southern District of New York and, on August 25, 2017, voluntarily dismissed that action without prejudice. On February 7, 2018, on motion from certain putative class members, the court consolidated Howard and Sullivan, closed Sullivan, and appointed lead plaintiffs in the consolidated case. On April 9, 2018, the lead plaintiffs in the consolidated purported class action filed a consolidated amended complaint. The consolidated amended complaint alleged that the registration statement for the Preferred Offering contained false and misleading statements and omitted to state material information, including by allegedly failing to disclose material uncertainties and trends resulting from sales of Reynobond PE for unsafe uses and by allegedly expressing a belief that appropriate risk management and compliance programs had been adopted while concealing the risks posed by Reynobond PE sales. The consolidated amended complaint also alleged that between November 4, 2013 and June 23, 2017 Arconic and Kleinfeld made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose material information about the Company’s commitment to safety, business and financial prospects, and the risks of the Reynobond PE product, including in Arconic’s Form 10-Ks for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, its Form 10-Qs and quarterly financial press releases from the fourth quarter of 2013 through the first quarter of 2017, its 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 Annual Reports, its 2016 Annual Highlights Report, and on its official website. The consolidated amended complaint sought, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages and an award of attorney and expert fees and expenses. On June 8, 2018, all defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint for failure to state a claim. On June 21, 2019, the Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss in full, dismissing the consolidated amended complaint in its entirety without prejudice. On July 23, 2019, the lead plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. The second amended complaint alleges generally the same claims as the consolidated amended complaint with certain additional allegations, as well as claims that the risk factors set forth in the registration statement for the Preferred Offering were inadequate and that certain additional statements in the sources identified above were misleading. The second amended complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages and an award of attorney and expert fees and expenses. On September 11, 2019, all defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. Plaintiffs’ opposition to that motion was filed by November 1, 2019 and all defendants filed a reply brief on November 26, 2019. Given the preliminary nature of this matter and the uncertainty of litigation, the Company cannot reasonably estimate at this time the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the possible loss or range of losses in the event of an unfavorable outcome.
Raul v. Albaugh, et al. As previously reported, on June 22, 2018, a derivative complaint was filed nominally on behalf of Arconic Inc. by a purported Arconic Inc. stockholder against the then members of Arconic’sArconic Inc.’s Board of Directors, and Klaus Kleinfeld and Ken Giacobbe, naming Arconic Inc. as a nominal defendant, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.defendant. The complaint raisesasserts claims under federal securities laws, most of which are similar allegations as the consolidated amended complaint and second amended complaintto those in Howard, as well as allegationsclaims under Delaware state law for breaches of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement and abuse of control, and also alleges that the defendants improperly authorized the sale of Reynobond PE for unsafe uses, and asserts claims under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Delaware state law. On July 13, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation agreeing to stay thisuses. The case has been stayed until the final resolution of the Howard case and the Regulatory Investigations. (vi) Stockholder Demands. Following the Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry in London, andFire, the investigation by the Police and on July 23, 2018, the Court approved the stay. Given the preliminary nature of this matter and the uncertainty of litigation, the Company cannot reasonably estimate at this time the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the possible loss or range of losses in the event of an unfavorable outcome.
While the Company believes that these cases are without merit and intends to challenge them vigorously, there can be no assurances regarding the ultimate resolution of these matters.
Stockholder Demands. As previously noted, thethen Arconic Inc. Board of Directors also(the “Board”) received letters, purportedly sent on behalf of stockholders, reciting allegations similar to those made in the federal court lawsuitsHoward and Raul cases and demanding that the Board authorize the CompanyArconic Inc. to initiate litigation against members of management, the Board and others. The Board of Directors appointed a Special Litigation Committee of the Board to review, investigate, and make recommendations to the Board regarding the appropriate course of action with respect to these stockholder demand letters. On May 22, 2019, the Special Litigation

Committee, following completion of its investigation into the claims demanded in the demand letters, recommended to the Board that it reject the demands to authorize commencement of litigation. On May 28, 2019, the Board adopted the Special Litigation Committee’s findings and recommendations of its Special Litigation Committee and rejected the demands that it authorize commencementstockholders’ demands. On June 28, 2021, one of actionsthe stockholders whose demand was rejected asked the current Howmet Board of Directors to assertreconsider the claims set forthdecision of the Board,
79


which was declined. On August 4, 2021, another stockholder whose demand was rejected requested books and records relating to, among other things, the Board’s decision to reject his initial demand, which the Company declined. There has been no further correspondence with either stockholder.
Legal Proceedings. Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (“LBIE”) Proceeding.On June 26, 2020, Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (“LBIE”) filed proceedings in the demand letters.High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales (the “Court”) against two subsidiaries of the Company, FR Acquisitions Corporation (Europe) Ltd and JFB Firth Rixson Inc. (collectively, the “Firth Rixson Entities”). The proceedings concern two interest rate swap transactions with LBIE (collectively, the “ISDAs”). In 2007 and 2008, the Firth Rixson Entities, then owned by Oak Hill, entered into the ISDAs in order to meet their obligation to hedge interest rate exposure under a lending agreement with LBIE. When LBIE went into bankruptcy in 2008, the Firth Rixson Entities entered into alternative swap agreements with another counterparty in order to meet this hedging obligation. The Firth Rixson Entities were acquired by the Company as part of its acquisition of the Firth Rixson business from Oak Hill in 2014. In the LBIE legal proceeding, LBIE claims the amounts owing by the Firth Rixson Entities under the ISDAs to be approximately $64, plus applicable interest. The Court issued its ruling in these proceedings on October 11, 2022 (the “Judgment”). In its ruling, the Court determined that the event of default under the ISDAs caused by LBIE as a result of its insolvency in 2008 and other defaults will conclude upon LBIE’s expected emergence from administration under the Insolvency Act of 1986. The Court ruled that upon such future event and other relevant steps being completed, the timing of which is unknown, the Firth Rixson Entities will be obligated to pay amounts due under the ISDAs. In late 2022, the Court granted LBIE a three-year extension of its bankruptcy administration. The Company recorded $65 in Other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and took a pre-tax charge of this amount in Other expense, net in the Statement of Consolidated Operations in 2022. The matter of interest was not specifically addressed in the proceeding and no related amounts have been reserved. The Company vigorously disagrees with the ruling including as to any payment obligation in respect of the principal as well as any interest. In December 2022, the Company was granted permission to appeal the Court’s decision.
Other.In addition to the matters discussed above, various other lawsuits, claims, and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against Arconic,theCompany, including those pertaining to environmental, product liability, safety and health, employment, tax and antitrust matters. While the amounts claimed in these other matters may be substantial, the ultimate liability cannot currently be determined because of the considerable uncertainties that exist. Therefore, it is possible that the Company’s liquidity or results of operations in a period could be materially affected by one or more of these other matters. However, based on facts currently available, management believes that the disposition of these other matters that are pending or asserted will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
Commitments
Purchase Obligations. ArconicHowmet has entered into purchase commitments for raw materials, energy and other goods and services, which total $604 in 2020, $93 in 2021, $45 in 2022, $12$265 in 2023, $4$140 in 2024, $14 in 2025, $2 in 2026, and $2none in 2027 and thereafter.
Operating Leases. See Note QO for the operating lease future minimum contractual obligations.
Guarantees. At December 31, 2019, Arconic2022, Howmet had outstanding bank guarantees related to tax matters, outstanding debt, workers’ compensation, environmental obligations, energy contracts, and customs duties, among others. The total amount committed under these guarantees, which expire at various dates between 20202023 and 2040, was $31$13 at December 31, 2019.2022.
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, between ArconicHowmet and Alcoa Corporation, ArconicHowmet was required to provide certain guarantees for Alcoa Corporation, which had a combined fair value of $9 and $6$6 at both December 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively,2021, and were included in Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits onin the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Furthermore,The remaining guarantee, for which the Company and Arconic was required to provide guarantees related to 2 long-term supply agreements for energy for Alcoa Corporation facilities in the event of an Alcoa Corporation payment default. In October 2017, Alcoa Corporation announced that it had terminated 1 of the 2 agreements, the electricity contract with Luminant Generation Company LLC that was tied to its Rockdale Operations, effective as of October 1, 2017. As a result of the termination of the Rockdale electricity contract, Arconic recorded income of $25 in the fourth quarter of 2017 associated with reversing the fair value of the electricity contract guarantee. For the remaining long-term supply agreement, Arconic is required to provide a guarantee up to an estimated present value amount of approximately $1,353 and $1,087 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, in the event of an Alcoa Corporation payment default. This guarantee expires in 2047. For this guarantee, subject to its provisions, Arconic isare secondarily liable in the event of a payment default by Alcoa Corporation. ArconicCorporation, relates to a long-term energy supply agreement that expires in 2047 at an Alcoa Corporation facility. The Company currently views the risk of an Alcoa Corporation payment default on its obligations under the contract to be remote. The Company and Arconic Corporation are required to provide a guarantee up to an estimated present value amount of approximately $1,040 and $1,406 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, in the event of an Alcoa Corporation default. In December 2019, Arconic entered into2020, December 2021, and December 2022, a one-year insurance policysurety bond with a limit of $80 relating to the remaining long-term energy supply agreement. The premium is expected to be paidthis guarantee was obtained by Alcoa Corporation. The decisionCorporation to enter into a claims purchase agreement or insurance policyprotect Howmet's obligation. This surety bond will be maderenewed on an annual basis going forward.by Alcoa Corporation.
Letters of Credit. ArconicThe Company has outstanding letters of credit, primarily related to workers’ compensation, environmental obligations, and leasinginsurance obligations. The total amount committed under these letters of credit, which automatically renew or expire at various dates, mostly in 2020,2023, was $142$120 at December 31, 2019.2022.

80


Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement,Agreements between the Company and Arconic wasCorporation and between the Company and Alcoa Corporation, the Company is required to retain letters of credit of $52$53 (which are included in the $120 in the above paragraph) that had previously been provided related to boththe Company, Arconic Corporation, and Alcoa Corporation workers’ compensation claims whichthat occurred prior to the respective separation transactions of April 1, 2020 and November 1, 2016. Arconic Corporation and Alcoa Corporation workers’ compensation claims and letters of credit fees paid by the Company are proportionally billed to, and are reimbursed by, Arconic Corporation and Alcoa Corporation, respectively. Also, the Company was required to provide letters of credit for certain Arconic Corporation environmental obligations and, as a result, the Company has $17 of outstanding letters of credit relating to such liabilities (which are also included in the $120 in the above paragraph). Arconic Corporation has issued surety bonds to cover these environmental obligations. Arconic Corporation is being billed for these letter of credit fees paid by Arconic are being proportionally billed tothe Company and are being fully reimbursed by Alcoa Corporation.will reimburse the Company for any payments made under these letters of credit.
Surety Bonds. ArconicThe Company has outstanding surety bonds primarily related to tax matters, contract performance, workers’ compensation, environmental-related matters, energy contracts, and customs duties. The total amount committed under these annual surety bonds, which expire and automatically renew at various dates, primarily in 2020,2023 and 2024, was $50$43 at December 31, 2019.2022.
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement,Agreements between the Company and Arconic wasCorporation and between the Company and Alcoa Corporation, the Company is required to provide surety bonds of $22 (which are included in the $43 in the above paragraph) that had previously been provided related to the Company, Arconic Corporation, and Alcoa Corporation workers’ compensation claims whichthat occurred prior to the respective separation transactions of April 1, 2020 and November 1, 20162016. Arconic Corporation and as a result, Arconic has $24 in outstanding surety bonds relating to these liabilities. Alcoa Corporation workers’ compensation claims and surety bond fees paid by Arconicthe Company are being proportionately billed to, and that portion billed is being fullyare reimbursed by, Alcoa Corporation.

U. Separation Transactions
2019 Proposed Separation Transaction. On February 8, 2019, Arconic announced, as part of its strategy and portfolio review, a separation of its portfolio into 2 independent, publicly-traded companies (the "Separation of Arconic"). The EP&F segment will remain in the existing company (Remain Co.) which will be renamed Howmet Aerospace Inc. at separation. The GRP segment will comprise Spin Co. and will be named Arconic Corporation at separation. The Company has also executed on the sale of businesses that do not best fit into the EP&F and GRP segments. The Company is targeting to complete the Separation of Arconic on April 1, 2020. The Separation of Arconic remains subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and may change if certain conditions are not satisfied by that date, as described in Arconic Rolled Products Corporation’s (“Arconic Corporation”) information statement filed with the Form 10.
On February 5, 2020, Arconic’s Board of Directors approved the completion of the separation by means of a pro rata distribution (the “Distribution”) by the Company of all of the outstanding common stock of Arconic Corporation. To consummate the separation and the Distribution, the Board declared a pro rata distribution of Arconic Corporation common stock, which is expected to be effective at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on April 1, 2020, to Company stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 19, 2020 (the “Record Date”). In the Distribution, each Company stockholder will receive one share of Arconic Corporation common stock for every four shares of the Company’s common stock held as of the close of business on the Record Date. Stockholders will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares of Arconic Corporation common stock.
Timothy D. Myers will serve as Arconic Corporation Chief Executive Officer. Arconic’s Board of Directors has also named new directors to the Arconic Corporation and Howmet Aerospace Boards. Joining the Arconic Corporation Board of Directors will be: Timothy Myers; William Austen; Christopher Ayers; Margaret Billson; Austin Camporin; Jacques Croisetiere; Elmer Doty; Carol Eicher; Fritz Henderson; E. Stanley O’Neal; and Jeffrey Stafeil. Christopher Ayers, Elmer Doty and Stanley O’Neal will resign from the Arconic Inc. Board of Directors. Joining the Howmet Aerospace Board of Directors will be: Joseph Cantie; Robert Leduc; Jody Miller; and Nicole Piasecki.Alcoa Corporation.
On February 7, 2020, the Company announced that Arconic Rolled Products Corporation (the “Issuer”), which is currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of Arconic, closed its offering of $600 aggregate principal amount of 6.125% second-lien notes due 2028 (the “Notes”). The Issuer intends to use the proceeds from the offering to make a payment to Arconic to fund the transfer of certain assets from Arconic to the Issuer in connection with the Separation of Arconic and for general corporate purposes. The net proceeds from the offering will be held in escrow until the completion of the separation and the satisfaction of certain other escrow release conditions. Prior to the separation, the Notes will not be guaranteed. Following the separation, the Notes will be guaranteed by certain of the Issuer’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. Each of the Notes and the related guarantees will be secured on a second-priority basis by liens on certain assets of the Issuer and the guarantors.
On February 13, 2020, the Form 10 for Arconic Rolled Products Corporation was declared effective by the SEC.
In 2019, Arconic recognized $78 in Selling, general administrative, and other expenses on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations for costs related to the Separation of Arconic.
2016 Separation Transaction. The separation of Alcoa Inc. into two standalone, publicly-traded companies, Arconic Inc. (the new name for Alcoa Inc.) and Alcoa Corporation, became effective on November 1, 2016 (the “Separation of Alcoa”). As part of the Separation of Alcoa, Arconic retained 19.9% of the Alcoa Corporation common stock (36,311,767 shares). In February 2017, Arconic sold 23,353,000 of its shares of Alcoa Corporation common stock at $38.03 per share, which resulted in cash proceeds of $888 which were recorded in Sales of investments within Investing Activities in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows, and a gain of $351 which was recorded in Other expense (income), net in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations. In April and May 2017, the Company acquired a portion of its outstanding notes held by two investment banks (the “Investment Banks”) in exchange for cash and the Company’s remaining 12,958,767 Alcoa Corporation shares (valued at $35.91 per share) (the “Debt-for-Equity Exchange”) (See Note P). A gain of $167 on the Debt-for-Equity Exchange was recorded in Other expense (income), net in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations. As of May 4, 2017, the Company no longer maintained a retained interest in Alcoa Corporation common stock.
As part of the Separation of Alcoa, Arconic was required to provide maximum potential future payment guarantees for Alcoa Corporation issued on behalf of a third party, guarantees related to two long-term Alcoa Corporation energy supply agreements, guarantees related to certain Alcoa Corporation environmental liabilities and energy supply contracts, letters of credit and surety bonds related to Alcoa Corporation workers’ compensation claims which occurred prior to November 1, 2016, and letters of credit for certain Alcoa Corporation equipment leases and energy contracts (see Note T).
As part of the Separation of Alcoa, Arconic received proceeds of $243 in 2017 related to Alcoa Corporation’s sale of its Yadkin Hydroelectric Project, which were included in Other within Investing Activities in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows.
During 2017, Arconic recognized $18 ($12 after-tax) in Selling, general administrative, and other expenses on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations for costs related to the Separation of Alcoa.

V.W. Subsequent Events
Management evaluated all activity of ArconicHowmet and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosure in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, except as noted below:
See Note RK for detailsthe open market debt repurchases made subsequent to the fourth quarter of 2022 as well as an amendment to remove GRP from the sale of receivables program.Credit Agreement on February 13, 2023 to replace LIBOR with Term SOFR as the reference rate therein.
See Note S for details of the divestiture of the Company's aluminum rolling mill in Itapissuma, Brazil.
See Note U for updates on the planned Separation of Arconic.
On February 25, 2020, the Company announced that its current Chief Executive Officer, John C. Plant, and Tolga Oal, who currently serves as President of the Company’s Engineered Structures business unit, will serve as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company following the Separation of Arconic.  Until the Separation of Arconic, Mr. Plant will continue to serve as sole Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Mr. Oal will hold the title of Co-Chief Executive Officer Designate.  Mr. Plant will serve as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Howmet Aerospace following the Separation of Arconic.


Supplemental Financial Information (unaudited)
Quarterly Data
(in millions, except per-share amounts)
81

 First
Second(2)
Third
Fourth(3)
Year
2019     
Sales$3,541
$3,691
$3,559
$3,401
$14,192
Net income (loss)$187
$(121)$95
$309
$470
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Arconic common shareholders(1):
     
Basic     
Net income (loss) per share—basic$0.40
$(0.27)$0.22
$0.71
$1.05
Diluted     
Net income (loss) per share—diluted$0.39
$(0.27)$0.21
$0.70
$1.03
2018     
Sales$3,445
$3,573
$3,524
$3,472
$14,014
Net income$143
$120
$161
$218
$642
Earnings per share attributable to Arconic common shareholders(1):
     
Basic     
Net income per share—basic$0.30
$0.25
$0.33
$0.45
$1.33
Diluted     
Net income per share—basic$0.29
$0.24
$0.32
$0.44
$1.30
Per share amounts are calculated independently for each period presented; therefore, the sum of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal the per share amounts for the year.
(2)
In the second quarter of 2019, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $428 related to its disks business (see Note M).
(3)
In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company incurred costs associated with the planned Separation of Arconic of $28 ($34 pre-tax), recorded a gain for contingent consideration received related to the 2018 sale of the Texarkana rolling mill of $15 ($20 pre-tax), and recorded several discrete tax items principally related to a benefit for a U.S. tax election which caused the deemed liquidation of a foreign subsidiary’s assets into its U.S. tax parent. In the fourth quarter of 2018, Arconic recorded a gain of $119 ($154 pre-tax) on the sale of the Texarkana rolling mill, offset by pension plan settlement charges of $72 ($92 pre-tax) associated with significant lump sum payments made to participants and a loss of $39 ($43 pre-tax) on the sale of the forging business in Hungary. Additionally, Arconic recorded discrete tax items primarily comprised of a benefit related to certain prior year foreign investment losses no longer recapturable.




Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Arconic’sHowmet’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report, and they have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K beginning on page 5336.
(c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The effectiveness of Arconic’sHowmet’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192022 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K on page 5437.
(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2019,2022, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspection.
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K regarding directors is contained under the caption “Item 1 Election of Directors” of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference. The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K regarding executive officers is set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this report under “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”
The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is contained under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
The Company’s Code of Ethics for the CEO, CFO and Other Financial Professionals is publicly available on the Company���sCompany’s Internet website at http://www.arconic.comwww.howmet.com under the section “Investors—Corporate Governance.Governance—Governance and Policies.” The remaining information required by Item 406 of Regulation S-K is contained under the captions “Corporate Governance” and “Corporate Governance—BusinessCode of Conduct Policies and Code of Ethics” of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
The information required by Items 407(c)(3), (d)(4) and (d)(5) of Regulation S-K is included under the captions “Item 1 Election of Directors—Nominating Board Candidates—Procedures and Director Qualifications” and “Corporate Governance—Committees of the Board—Audit Committee” of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is contained under the captions “Director Compensation”, “Executive Compensation” and “Corporate Governance—Recovery of Incentive Compensation” of the Proxy Statement. Such information is incorporated by reference.reference, except as to information required pursuant to Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K relating to pay versus performance.
The information required by Items 407(e)(4) and (e)(5) of Regulation S-K is contained under the captions “Corporate Governance—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Item 3 Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation—Compensation Committee Report” of the Proxy Statement. Such information (other than the Compensation Committee Report, which shall not be deemed to be “filed”) is incorporated by reference.
82


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table gives information requiredabout Howmet’s common stock that could be issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2022:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and rights

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options, warrants and rights
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in column (a))
(a)(b)(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
7,411,252(1)
$23.86 
23,432,811(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders— — — 
Total7,411,252 $23.86 23,432,811 
(1)    Includes the 2013 Howmet Aerospace Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated (approved by Item 201(d)shareholders in May 2019, May 2018, May 2016 and May 2013) (the “2013 Plan”) and the 2009 Alcoa Stock Incentive Plan (approved by shareholders in May 2009). Table amounts are comprised of Regulation S-K relatingthe following:
936,242 stock options
3,527,349 restricted share units
2,947,661 performance share awards (191,217 granted in 2022 at target)
(2)     The 2013 Plan authorizes, in addition to securities authorizedstock options, other types of stock-based awards in the form of stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units, performance awards and other awards. The shares that remain available for issuance under equity compensation plans is containedthe 2013 Plan may be issued in connection with any one of these awards. Up to 66,666,667 shares may be issued under the caption “Equity Compensationplan. Any award other than an option or a stock appreciation right shall count as 2.33 shares. Options and stock appreciation rights shall be counted as one share for each option or stock appreciation right. In addition, the 2013 Plan Information”provides the following are available to grant under the 2013 Plan: (i) shares that are issued under the 2013 Plan, which are subsequently forfeited, cancelled or expire in accordance with the terms of the Proxy Statementaward and is

incorporated by reference.(ii) shares that had previously been issued under prior plans that are outstanding as of the date of the 2013 Plan which are subsequently forfeited, cancelled or expire in accordance with the terms of the award.
The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K is contained under the captions “Arconic“Howmet Aerospace Stock Ownership— Ownership���Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “— “Howmet Aerospace Stock Ownership—Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by Item 404 of Regulation S-K is contained under the captions “Executive Compensation” (excluding the information under the caption “Compensation Committee Report”) and “Corporate Governance— Related Person Transactions” of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
The information required by Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K regarding director independence is contained under the captions “Item 1 Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance” of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A is contained under the captions “Item 2 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Report of the Audit Committee” and “— “Item 2 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Audit and Non-Audit Fees” of the Proxy Statement and in its Attachment A (Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and Non-Audit Services) thereto and is incorporated by reference.
83


PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) The consolidated financial statements and exhibits listed below are filed as part of this report.
(1) The Company’s consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto and the report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are on pages 5437 through 10681 of this report.
(2) Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits.
Exhibit
Number
Description*
Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2014, by and among Alcoa Inc., Alcoa IH Limited, FR Acquisition Corporation (US), Inc., FR Acquisitions Corporation (Europe) Limited, FR Acquisition Finance Subco (Luxembourg), S.à.r.l. and Oak Hill Capital Partners III, L.P. and Oak Hill Capital Management Partners III, L.P., collectively in their capacity as the Seller Representative, incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated June 27, 2014.
Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, by and between Arconic Inc. and Alcoa Corporation, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated November 4, 2016.
Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, by and between Arconic Inc. and Alcoa Corporation, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 2.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated November 4, 2016.
Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, by and between Arconic Inc. and Alcoa Corporation, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 2.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated November 4, 2016.
Amendment No. 1, dated December 13, 2016, to Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, by and between Arconic Inc. and Alcoa Corporation, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 2(e)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Alcoa Corporation to Arconic Inc. Patent, Know-How, and Trade Secret License Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, by and between Alcoa USA Corp. and Arconic Inc., incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 2.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated November 4, 2016.
First Amendment, effective as of November 1, 2016, to the Patent, Know-How and Trade Secret License Agreement by and between Alcoa USA Corp. and Arconic Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(d)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Second Amendment, effective as of October 18, 2021, to the Patent, Know-How and Trade Secret License Agreement by and between Alcoa USA Corp. and Arconic Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(d)(2) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Arconic Inc. to Alcoa Corporation Patent, Know-How, and Trade Secret License Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, by and between Arconic Inc. and Alcoa USA Corp., incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 2.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated November 4, 2016.
Amended and Restated Alcoa Corporation to Arconic Inc. Trademark License Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2017, by and between Alcoa USA Corp. and Arconic Inc., incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2017.
Master Agreement for the Supply of Primary Aluminum, dated as of October 31, 2016, by and between Alcoa Corporation and its affiliates and Arconic Inc., incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated November 4, 2016.
Massena Lease and Operations Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2016, by and between Arconic Inc. and Alcoa Corporation, incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated November 4, 2016.
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 12, 2017, by and between Arconic Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, and Arconic Inc., a Delaware corporation, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 4, 2018.
Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2020, by and between Arconic Inc. and Arconic Rolled Products Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2020.
Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2020, by and between Arconic Inc. and Arconic Rolled Products Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2020.
Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2020, by and between Arconic Inc. and Arconic Rolled Products Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2020.
84


First Amendment to Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of April 10, 2020, by and between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Arconic Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2020.
Patent, Know-How, and Trade Secret License Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2020, by and between Arconic Inc. and Arconic Rolled Products Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2020.
Amendment No. 1, effective as of August 25, 2020, to Patent, Know-How, and Trade Secret License Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2020, by and between Arconic Inc. and Arconic Rolled Products Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(m)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Patent, Know-How, and Trade Secret License Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2020, by and between Arconic Rolled Products Corporation and Arconic Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2020.
Trademark License Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2020, by and between Arconic Rolled Products Corporation and Arconic Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.6 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2020.
Trademark License Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2020, by and between Arconic Inc. and Arconic Rolled Products Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.7 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2020.
Master Agreement for Product Supply, dated as of March 31, 2020, by and between Arconic Massena LLC, Arconic Lafayette LLC, Arconic Davenport LLC and Arconic Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.8 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2020.
Second Supplemental Tax and Project Certificate and Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2020, by and among Arconic Inc., Arconic Davenport LLC and Arconic Rolled Products Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.9 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2020.
Third Supplemental Tax and Project Certificate and Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2023, by and among Howmet Aerospace Inc., Arconic US LLC and Arconic Corporation.
Metal Supply & Tolling Agreement by and between Arconic-Köfém Mill Products Hungary Kft and Arconic-Köfém Kft, dated January 1, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(t) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Certificate of Incorporation of ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc., a Delaware corporation, incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1Exhibit 3(a) to the Company’s CurrentCompany's Annual Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 4, 2018.10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Amendment to Arconic Inc. Certificate of Incorporation, effective as of the Separation of Arconic, incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated February 6, 2020.

Bylaws of ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc., a Delaware corporation, incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2Exhibit 3(b) to the Company’s CurrentCompany's Annual Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 4, 2018.10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Amendment to Arconic Inc. Bylaws, effective as of the Separation of Arconic, incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated February 6, 2020.
Form of Certificate for Shares of Common Stock of Arconic Inc., a Delaware corporation, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 4, 2018.
Bylaws. See exhibitsexhibit 3(b) and 3(b)(1) above.
4(c)Form of Indenture, dated as of September 30, 1993, between Alcoa Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor to J. P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (formerly Chase Manhattan Trust Company, National Association), as successor Trustee to PNC Bank, National Association, as Trustee (undated form of Indenture incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement No. 33-49997 on Form S-3).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 25, 2007, between Alcoa Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (formerly Chase Manhattan Trust Company, National Association), as successor Trustee to PNC Bank, National Association, as Trustee, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 99.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 25, 2007.
85


Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 2008, between Alcoa Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor in interest to J. P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (formerly Chase Manhattan Trust Company, National Association, as successor to PNC Bank, National Association), as Trustee, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 4(c) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated July 15, 2008.

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 31, 2017, between Arconic Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, Arconic Inc., a Delaware corporation, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 4, 2018.
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 16, 2020, between Howmet Aerospace Inc., a Delaware corporation, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(e) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration Statement No. 333-237705) dated April 16, 2020.
Form of 6.75% Bonds Due 2028, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 4(d) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Form of 5.90% Notes Due 2027, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 4(e) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Form of 5.95% Notes Due 2037, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 4(f) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Form of 5.87% Notes Due 2022, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated February 21, 2007.
Form of 6.150% Notes Due 2020, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated August 3, 2010.
Form of 5.40% Notes Due 2021, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated April 21, 2011.
Form of 5.125% Notes Due 2024, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated September 22, 2014.
Arconic Bargaining Retirement Savings Plan (formerly known as the Alcoa Retirement Savings Plan for Bargaining Employees), as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2015,Form of 6.875% Notes due 2025, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4(p)Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2015.8-K dated April 24, 2020.
Arconic Salaried Retirement Savings Plan (formerly known as the Alcoa Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees), as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2015,Form of 3.000% Notes due 2029, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4(s)Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2015.8-K dated September 1, 2021.
Arconic Retirement Savings Plan for ATEP Bargaining Employees, effective January 1, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4 to Post-Effective Amendment, dated December 30, 2016, to Registration Statement No. 333-32516 on Form S-8.
Arconic Corp. Hourly 401(k) Plan, effective as of February 1, 2020, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4(a) to Post-Effective Amendment dated February 3, 2020, to Registration Statement No. 333-32516 on Form S-8.

Arconic Corp. Salaried 401(k) Plan, effective as of February 1, 2020, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4(b) to Post-Effective Amendment dated February 3, 2020, to Registration Statement No. 333-32516 on Form S-8.

Description of Arconic Inc.'s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Indenture, dated February 7, 2020, among Arconic Rolled Products Corporation, the guarantors from time to time party thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent, and U.S. Bank National Association, as registrar, paying agent and authenticating agent,1934, incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.2Exhibit 4(p) to the Company’s CurrentAnnual Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated February 7, 2020.10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Earnout Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2014, byAmended and among Alcoa Inc., FR Acquisition Finance Subco (Luxembourg), S.à.r.l. and Oak Hill Capital Partners III, L.P. and Oak Hill Capital Management Partners III, L.P., collectively in their capacity as the Seller Representative, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated June 27, 2014.
Restated Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2014,September 28, 2021, among Alcoa Inc., the Lenders and Issuers named therein, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent for the Lenders and Issuers, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated July 31, 2014.

Extension Request and Amendment Letter, dated as of June 5, 2015, among Alcoa Inc., each lender and issuer party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, effective July 7, 2015, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated July 13, 2015.
Amendment No. 1, dated September 16, 2016, to the Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2014, among ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc., the lenders and issuers named therein, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as syndication agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated September 19, 2016.
Assumption Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2017, by Arconic Inc., a Delaware corporation, in favor of and for the benefit of the Lenders and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 4, 2018.

Amendment No. 2, dated as of June 29, 2018, to the Company’s Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2014, by and among the Company, a syndicate of lenders and issuers named therein, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders and issuers, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 2018.September 28, 2021.
PleaAmendment No. 1, dated as of February 13, 2023, to Amended and Restated Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated January 8, 2014, betweenas of September 28, 2021, among Howmet Aerospace Inc., the United States of Americalenders and Alcoa World Alumina LLC, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(l) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2013.issuers named therein, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent.
Agreement, dated February 1, 2016, by and between Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott International, L.P., Elliott International Capital Advisors Inc. and Alcoa Inc., incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated February 1, 2016.
Settlement Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2017, by and among Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott International, L.P., Elliott International Capital Advisors Inc. and Arconic Inc., incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated May 22, 2017 (reporting an event on May 21, 2017).
Letter Agreement, by and among Arconic Inc. and Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott International, L.P. and Elliott International Capital Advisors Inc., dated as of December 19, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated December 19, 2017.
Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Arconic Inc. and Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott International, L.P. and Elliott International Capital Advisors Inc., dated as of December 19, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated December 19, 2017.
86


Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Arconic Inc. and Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott International, L.P. and Elliott International Capital Advisors Inc., dated as of February 2, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated February 6, 2018.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan (formerly known as the Arconic Inc. 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan,Plan), incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated December 10, 2019.
2019.
Arconic Employees’Howmet Aerospace Hourly Retirement Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective January 1, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
First Amendment, effective January 1, 2022, to the Howmet Aerospace Hourly Retirement Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Howmet Aerospace Salaried Retirement Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g)(2) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Howmet Aerospace Excess Benefits Plan C (formerly referred toknown as the Alcoa Inc.Arconic Employees’ Excess Benefits Plan, Plan C), as amended and restated effective August 1, 2016, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(j) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
First Amendment to Howmet Aerospace Excess Benefits Plan C (formerly known as the Arconic Employees’ Excess Benefits Plan C (as amended and restated effective August 1, 2016)C), effective January 1, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(l)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Second Amendment to Howmet Aerospace Excess Benefits Plan C (formerly known as the Arconic Employees’ Excess Benefits Plan C (as amended and restated effective August 1, 2016)C), effective January 1, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(l)(2) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Third Amendment to Howmet Aerospace Excess Benefits Plan C (formerly known as the Arconic Employees’ Excess Benefits Plan C (as amended and restatedC), effective August 1, 2016),March 31, 2018. incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 8, 2018.
Deferred Fee Plan for Directors, as amended effective July 9, 1999, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(g)(1) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 1999.
Amended and Restated Deferred Fee Plan for Directors, effective NovemberApril 1, 2016,2020, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(c)Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2020.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy, effective February 6, 2019, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(m) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2018.January 1, 2023.
10(m)10(l)Fee Continuation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(k) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 1989.
Amendment to Fee Continuation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective November 10, 1995, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(i)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 1995.
Second Amendment to the Fee Continuation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective September 15, 2006, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated September 20, 2006.
Howmet Aerospace Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly known as the Arconic Deferred Compensation Plan,Plan), as amended and restated effective August 1, 2016, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(p) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
First Amendment to the Howmet Aerospace Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly known as the Arconic Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated effective August 1, 2016)Plan), effective January 1, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(r)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
87


10(o)10(n)Summary of the Executive Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan, dated November 1990, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(m) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 1990.
Amended and Restated Dividend Equivalent Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 1997, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(h) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.
10(q)10(p)Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Company and individual directors or officers, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(j) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 1987.)
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and individual directors or officers, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 25, 2018.
Amended and Restated 2009 Alcoa Stock Incentive Plan, dated February 15, 2011, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(z)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ArconicHowmet Aerospace Supplemental Pension Plan for Senior Executives (formerly referred toknown as the AlcoaArconic Supplemental Pension Plan for Senior Executives), as amended and restated effective August 1, 2016, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(v) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
First Amendment to Howmet Aerospace Supplemental Pension Plan for Senior Executives (formerly known as the Arconic Supplemental Pension Plan for Senior Executives (as amended and restated effective August 1, 2016)Executives), effective January 1, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(x)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Second Amendment to Howmet Aerospace Supplemental Pension Plan for Senior Executives (formerly known as the Arconic Supplemental Pension Plan for Senior Executives (as amended and restated effective August 1, 2016)Executives), effective January 1, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(x)(2) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Deferred Fee Estate Enhancement Plan for Directors, effective July 10, 1998, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(r) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1- 3610) for the year ended December 31, 1998.
ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan, as amendedAmended and restated,Restated, effective May 14, 2019,September 17, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 17, 2019.
filed on September 23, 2021.
Letter Agreement, dated August 14, 2007, between Alcoa Inc. and Klaus Kleinfeld, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
Executive Severance Agreement, as amended and restated effective December 8, 2008, between Alcoa Inc. and Klaus Kleinfeld, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(gg) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Letter Agreement between Arconic Inc. and Klaus Kleinfeld, dated February 27, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(y)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Separation Agreement between Arconic Inc. and Klaus Kleinfeld, dated July 31, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(c) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2017.
Form of Executive Severance Agreement between the Company and new officers entered into after July 22, 2010, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. Executive Severance Plan, as amendedAmended and restated,Restated, effective May 14, 2019, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated MaySeptember 17, 2019.
Letter Agreement, by and between Alcoa Inc. and Katherine H. Ramundo, dated as of July 28, 2016, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(ff) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Letter Agreement, from Arconic Inc. to Katherine H. Ramundo, dated as of May 31, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(c) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2018.
Letter Agreement between Arconic Inc. and David P. Hess, dated May 17, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated May 22, 2017 (reporting an event on May 17, 2017).
Letter Agreement, by and between Arconic Inc. and Charles P. Blankenship, dated as of October 19, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated October 23, 2017
Separation Agreement between Arconic Inc. and Charles P. Blankenship, dated as of March 14, 2019,2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 18, 2019.filed on September 23, 2021.
Letter Agreement, by and between Arconic Inc. and Mark J. Krakowiak,Michael N. Chanatry, dated as of JanuaryMarch 20, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(ii)Exhibit 10(w) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.2021.
Letter Agreement, from Arconic Inc. to Ken Giacobbe, dated as of February 14, 2019, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(hh) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Letter Agreement, by and between Arconic Inc. and John C. Plant, dated as of February 6,13, 2019, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended March 31, 2019.
Letter Agreement, by and between Arconic Inc. and John C. Plant, dated as of August 1, 2019, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2019.

Letter Agreement, by and between Arconic Inc. and John C. Plant, dated as of February 24, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 25, 2020.
88



Letter Agreement between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and John C. Plant, dated as of June 9, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2020.
Letter Agreement, by and between ArconicHowmet Aerospace Inc. and Elmer L. Doty,John C. Plant, dated as of February 6, 2019,October 14, 2021, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(b)Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended March 31, 2019.8-K filed on October 14, 2021.
Letter Agreement, by and between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and John C. Plant, dated as of December 2, 2022, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2022.
Letter Agreement, by and between Arconic Inc. and Neil E. Marchuk, dated as of February 13, 2019, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(c) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended March 31, 2019.
Letter Agreement between Arconic Inc. and Timothy D. Myers, dated as of January 13, 2020, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated January 17, 2020.
Letter Agreement between Arconic Inc. and Tolga Oal, dated as of JanuaryFebruary 24, 2020, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated JanuaryFebruary 25, 2020.
Arconic Global PensionHowmet Aerospace Inc. Legal Fee Reimbursement Plan (formerly known as amended and restated effective August 1, 2016, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(bb) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Global Expatriate Employee Policy (pre-January 1, 2003), incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(uu) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Arconic Inc. Legal Fee Reimbursement Plan,Plan), effective as of April 30, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.
Summary Description of Equity Choice Program for Performance Equity Award Participants, dated November 2005, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated November 16, 2005.
2013 ArconicHowmet Aerospace Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective September 30, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K dated May 17, 2019.
Terms and Conditions (Australian Addendum) to the 2013 Arconic Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 3, 2013, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(d) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated May 8, 2013.
RTI International Metals, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4(b) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated July 23, 2015.
RTI International Metals, Inc. 2014 Stock and Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4(a) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated July 23, 2015.
First Amendment to the RTI International Metals, Inc. 2014 Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended and assumed by Arconic Inc., dated February 1, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(oo)(1) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610)10-Q for the yearquarter ended December 31, 2017.
Form of Award Agreement for Stock Options, effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(ddd) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Terms and Conditions for Stock Options, effective January 1, 2011, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(c) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
Terms and Conditions for Stock Option Awards, effective May 3, 2013, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-3610) dated May 8, 2013.
Terms and Conditions for Stock Option Awards under the 2013 ArconicHowmet Aerospace Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 22, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2016.
Global Stock Option Award Agreement, effective January 19, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(uu) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(f) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2018.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units, effective May 3, 2013, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(c) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1- 3610) dated May 8, 2013.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units under the 2013 Arconic Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 22, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2016.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units for Annual Director Awards under the 2013 ArconicHowmet Aerospace Stock Incentive Plan, effective November 30, 2016, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(vv) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units for Annual Director Awards under the 2013 ArconicHowmet Aerospace Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective December 5, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.
Terms and Conditions for Deferred Fee Restricted Share Units for Director Awards under the 2013 ArconicHowmet Aerospace Stock Incentive Plan, effective November 30, 2016, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(ww) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units issued on or after January 13, 2017, under the 2013 Arconic Stock Incentive Plan, effective January 13, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(xx) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units - Interim CEO (David P. Hess) Award, effective October 23, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(ccc) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units - Non-Executive Chairman (John C. Plant) Director Award, effective October 23, 2017, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(ddd) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units - Non-Executive Chairman (John C. Plant) Director Award, effective October 23, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended September 30, 2018.
Global Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement, effective January 19, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(eee) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units issued on or after January 19, 2018, under the 2013 ArconicHowmet Aerospace Stock Incentive Plan, effective January 19, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(fff) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.

89


Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10(g) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2018.
Global Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement, - Executive Vice President, Human Resources (Neil E. Marchuk) Annual Equity Award, effective March 15, 2019,September 30, 2020, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(f)Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020.
Global Stock Option Award Agreement, effective September 30, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020.
Global Special Retention Award Agreement, effective September 30, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020.
Terms and Conditions for Restricted Share Units, effective September 30, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020.
Form of Confidentiality, Non-Competition, and Non-Solicitation Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended March 31, 2019.June 30, 2021.
Restricted Share Unit AwardLetter Agreement, - Executive Vice President, Human Resources (Neil E. Marchuk) Sign-on Equity Award, effective March 15, 2019,by and between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Lola Lin, dated as of May 5, 2021, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(g)Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended March 31, 2019.June 30, 2021.
Terms and Conditions
Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement - Annual Equity Award for Special Retention Awards under the 2013 Arconic Stock Incentive Plan,Lola Lin, effective January 1, 2015,July 15, 2021 incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(a)Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2015.2021.
Terms and Conditions for Special Retention Awards under the 2013 Arconic Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 22, 2016, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(e) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2016.
Global Special Retention Award Agreement, effective January 19, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(kkk) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Special Retention Award Agreement - Katherine H. Ramundo, effective May 16, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(d) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2018.
Special Retention Award Agreement - Paul Myron, effective May 16, 2018, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(e) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2018.
Special Retention Award Agreement - Ken Giacobbe, effective February 12, 2019, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(nnn) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-3610) for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Special Retention Award Agreement - Paul Myron, effective February 28, 2019, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(d) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended March 31, 2019.
Special Retention Award Agreement - Neil E. Marchuk, effective May 14, 2019, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(d) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-3610) for the quarter ended June 30, 2019.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Power of Attorney for certain directors.Attorney.
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101. INSInline XBRL Instance Document.
101. SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101. CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101. DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101. LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101. CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101. DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101. LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101. PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104The cover page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted2022 (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
 * Exhibit Nos. 10(h)10(f) through 10(xxx)10(yy) are management contracts or compensatory plans required to be filed as Exhibits to this Form 10-K.
Amendments and modifications to other Exhibits previously filed have been omitted when in the opinion of the registrant such Exhibits as amended or modified are no longer material or, in certain instances, are no longer required to be filed as Exhibits.
No otherCertain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the registrant orRegistrant and its subsidiaries have been filed as Exhibits because no such instruments met the threshold materiality requirements underare omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K. The registrant agrees, however,Registrant hereby undertakes to furnish a copyto the SEC, upon request, copies of any such instruments to the Commission upon request.instruments.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
None.

90


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC.
February 14, 2023ARCONIC INC.By/s/ Barbara L. Shultz
Barbara L. Shultz
February 26, 2020By/s/ Paul Myron
Paul Myron
Vice President and Controller (Also signing as Principal Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ John C. PlantFebruary 26, 202014, 2023
John C. Plant

Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal (Principal Executive Officer and Director)
    /s/ Ken GiacobbeFebruary 26, 202014, 2023
Ken GiacobbeExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
James F. Albaugh, Amy E. Alving, Christopher L. Ayers, Elmer L. Doty, Rajiv L. Gupta, Sean O. Mahoney,Sharon R. Barner, Joseph S. Cantie, Robert F. Leduc, David J. Miller, E. Stanley O’Neal,Jody G. Miller, Nicole W. Piasecki and Ulrich R. Schmidt, each as a Director, on February 26, 2020,14, 2023, by Paul Myron,Barbara L. Shultz, their Attorney-in-Fact.*
 
*By/s/ Paul MyronBarbara L. Shultz
Paul MyronBarbara L. Shultz
Attorney-in-Fact


118
91