0000004977 us-gaap:FixedMaturitiesMember us-gaap:PublicUtilityBondsMember 2016-12-31
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152018
or
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-07434
aflaclogoa01a01a01a19.jpg
Aflac Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia 58-1167100
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
1932 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia 31999
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 706.323.3431
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.10 Par Value New York Stock Exchange
  Tokyo Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:    None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    þ Yes    ¨  No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    ¨  Yes    þ  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.            þ  Yes  ¨  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    þ  Yes  ¨  No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company”company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
  Large accelerated filerþ  Accelerated filer¨
  Non-accelerated filer¨(Do not check if smaller reporting company Smaller reporting company  ¨
Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨  Yes    þ  No
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2015,2018, was $27.$33,002,565,252.
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at February 16, 2016,12, 2019, with $.10 par value, was 420,001,378.750,332,375.
 
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Certain information contained in the Notice and Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 2, 2016, is incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.
 





Aflac Incorporated
Annual Report on Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 20152018
Table of Contents
  Page
   
PART I  Page
   
Item 1.
   
Item 1A.
   
Item 1B.
   
Item 2.
   
Item 3.
   
Item 4.
   
PART II  
   
Item 5.
   
Item 6.
   
Item 7.
   
Item 7A.
   
Item 8.
   
Item 9.
   
Item 9A.
   
Item 9B.
   
PART III  
   
Item 10.
   
Item 11.
   
Item 12.
   
Item 13.
   
Item 14.
   
PART IV  
   
Item 15.
 




 


i




Item 1. Business




PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
WeAflac Incorporated (the Parent Company) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This report includes certain forward-looking information that is based on current expectations and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. For details on forward-looking information, see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), Part II, Item 7, of this report.
Aflac Incorporated qualifies as a large accelerated filer within the meaning of Rule 12b-2 under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act Rule 12b-2. Ourof 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act). The Company's Internet address is aflac.com. The information on the Company's Web sitewebsite is not incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 10-K. We makeThe Company makes available, free of charge on our Web site, ourthe Investors portion of its website, the Company's annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments thereto as soon as reasonably practicable after those forms have been electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).


General Description
Aflac Incorporated (the Parent Company) was incorporated in 1973 under the laws of the state of Georgia. Aflac Incorporated is a general business holding company and acts as a management company, overseeing the operations of its subsidiaries by providing management services and making capital available. Its principal business is voluntary supplemental health and life insurance, which is marketed and administered through its subsidiary, American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (Aflac), which operates in the United States (Aflac U.S.) and, as a brancheffective April 1, 2018, through Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. in Japan (Aflac Japan). Prior to April 1, 2018, the Company's insurance business was marketed in Japan as a branch of Aflac. American Family Life Assurance Company of New York (Aflac New York) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Aflac. Most of Aflac's policies are individually underwritten and marketed through independent agents. Additionally, Aflac U.S. markets and administers group products through Continental American Insurance Company (CAIC), branded as Aflac Group Insurance. OurThe Company's insurance operations in the United States and our branch in Japan service the two markets for ourthe Company's insurance business.
Effective April 1, 2018, the Company converted Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary incorporated as a Japanese stock corporation. The transaction was accounted for as tax-neutral and did not have a material impact on the daily operations of either Aflac Japan or Aflac U.S. In addition, the Company obtained and expects to continue to obtain enhanced flexibility in capital management and business development as a result of the conversion.

The Company offers voluntary insurance policies in Japan and the United States that provide a layer of financial protection against income and asset loss. We continueThe Company continues to diversify ourits product offerings in both Japan and the United States. Aflac Japan sells voluntary supplemental insurance products, including cancer plans, general medical indemnity plans, medical/sickness riders, care plans, living benefit life plans, ordinary life insurance plans and annuities. Aflac U.S. sells voluntary supplemental insurance products including products designed to protect individuals from depletion of assets (accident, cancer, critical illness/ care, hospital intensive care, hospital indemnity, fixed-benefit dental, and vision care plans) and loss-of-income products (life and short-term disability plans).


We areThe Company is authorized to conduct insurance business in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, several U.S. territories and Japan.

Reporting Segments

The Company's insurance business consists of two reporting segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. Aflac Japan is the principal contributor to the Parent Company’s consolidated earnings. Aflac Japan's revenues, including realized gains and losses on its investment portfolio, accounted for 70% of the Company's total revenues in 2015,2018, compared with 72%70% in 20142017 and 74%71% in 2013.2016. The percentage of the Company's total assets attributable to Aflac Japan was 84% and 83% at December 31, 2015, compared with 82% at December 31, 2014.2018 and 2017, respectively. The conversion of Aflac Japan to a subsidiary structure did not affect the Company's segment reporting structure.
Results of Operations
For information on ourthe Company's results of operations and financial information by segment, see MD&A and Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Foreign Currency Translation
For information regarding the effect of currency fluctuations on our business, see the Foreign Currency Translation and Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Currency Risk subsections of MD&A and Notes 1 and 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

1




Insurance Premiums



Certain Performance Measures
The Company evaluates its premium growth and sales efforts using the following performance measures:
Annualized premiums in force is defined as the amount of gross premium that a policyholder must pay over a full year in order to keep coverage. The growth of earnednet premiums (defined below) is directly affected by the change in premiums in force and by the change in weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rates. Consolidated earned premiums were $17.6 billion in 2015, $19.1 billion in 2014, and $20.1 billion in 2013. For additional information
New annualized premium sales (sometimes referred to as new sales or sales) is an operating measure that is not reflected on the compositionCompany's financial statements. New annualized premium sales generally represents annual premiums on policies the Company sold and incremental increases from policy conversions, collected over a 12-month period, assuming the policies remain in force. For Aflac Japan, new annualized premium sales are determined by applications submitted during the reporting period. For Aflac U.S., new annualized premium sales are determined by applications that are issued during the reporting period. Conversions are defined as the positive difference in the annualized premium when a policy upgrades in the current reporting period.
Net premiums (sometimes referred to as net premium income or net earned premiums) is a financial measure that appears on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Earnings and in its segment reporting. This measure reflects collected or due premiums that have been earned ratably on policies in force during the reporting period, reduced by premiums that have been ceded to third parties and increased by segment,premiums assumed through reinsurance.

Foreign Currency Translation

Aflac Japan’s premiums and approximately half of its investment income are received in yen. Claims and most expenses are paid in yen, and the Company purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. For information regarding the effect of currency fluctuations on the Company's business, see Notethe Hedging Activities subsection within the Analysis of Financial Condition section of MD&A, the Currency Risk subsection within Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, and Notes 1 and 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. The following table presentsFor information regarding how the changes in annualized premiums in force for Aflac's insurance business forCompany’s investment strategy supports management of foreign currency risk, refer to the years ended December 31.
Investments subsection below.
(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Annualized premiums in force, beginning of year$18,894
 $20,440
 $22,689
New sales, including conversions2,484
 2,513
 2,963
Change in unprocessed new sales(41) 13
 66
Premiums lapsed and surrendered(2,104) (2,146) (2,154)
Other(56) (29) 17
Foreign currency translation adjustment(4) (1,897) (3,141)
Annualized premiums in force, end of year$19,173
 $18,894
 $20,440

Insurance - Japan
We translate Aflac Japan's annualized premiums in force into dollars at the respective end-of-period exchange rates. Changes in annualized premiums in force are translated at weighted-average exchange rates. The following table presents the changes in annualized premiums in force for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.Products(1)
  In Dollars In Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2015 2014 2013 2015
 2014
 2013
Annualized premiums in force, beginning of year$13,226
 $14,870
 $17,238
 1,594
 1,567
 1,492
New sales, including conversions997
 1,080
 1,539
 121
 115
 149
Change in unprocessed new sales(41) 13
 66
 (5) 1
 6
Premiums lapsed and surrendered(578) (695) (717) (70) (74) (70)
Other(187) (145) (115) (23) (15) (10)
Foreign currency translation adjustment(4) (1,897) (3,141) 0
 0
 0
Annualized premiums in force, end of year$13,413
 $13,226
 $14,870
 1,617
 1,594
 1,567
Aflac JapanAflac U.S.
Third Sector InsuranceAccident
CancerShort-Term Disability
Medical
Critical Care (2)
Income SupportHospital Indemnity
First Sector InsuranceDental
LifeVision
ProtectionLife (Term and Whole)
Term
Whole
Savings
WAYS
Child Endowment
For further information regarding Aflac Japan's financial results(1) Actively marketed as of December 31, 2018
(2) Includes cancer, critical illness, and sales, see the Aflac Japan Segment subsection of MD&A in this report.hospital intensive care products


Insurance - U.S.
The following table presents the changes in annualized premiums in force for Aflac U.S. for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Annualized premiums in force, beginning of year $5,668
   $5,570
   $5,451
 
New sales, including conversions 1,487
   1,433
   1,424
 
Premiums lapsed (1,526)   (1,451)   (1,437) 
Other 131
   116
   132
 
Annualized premiums in force, end of year $5,760
   $5,668
   $5,570
 
For further information regarding Aflac's U.S. financial results and sales, see the Aflac U.S. Segment subsection of MD&A in this report.

Insurance Products - Japan
Aflac Japan's insurance products are designed to help consumers pay for medical and nonmedical costs that are not reimbursed under Japan's national health insurance system. Changes in Japan's economy and an aging population have put increasing pressure on Japan's national health care system. As a result, more costs are beinghave been shifted to Japanese


2







consumers, who in turn have become increasingly interested in insurance products that help them manage those costs. Aflac Japan has responded to this consumer need by enhancing existing products and developing new products.
The foundation of Aflac Japan's product portfolio has expanded beyond traditional health-relatedbeen, and continues to be, its third sector products, which include cancer, medical and income support insurance products. Aflac pioneered the cancer insurance market in Japan in 1974, and remains the number one provider of cancer insurance in Japan today. Over the years, Aflac Japan has customized its cancer insurance product to include more life products. Somerespond to, and anticipate, the needs of its consumers and the life products that we offeradvances in medical treatments. The cancer insurance plans the Company offers in Japan provide death benefits and cash surrender values. These products are available as stand-alone policies and riders. Some plans, such as our WAYS product, have features that allow policyholders to convert a portion of their life insurance to medical, nursing care, or fixed annuity benefits at a predetermined age. Our child endowment product offers a death benefit until a child reaches age 18. It also pays a lump-sum benefit at the timeupon initial diagnosis of the child's entry into high school, as well as an educational annuity for each of the four years during his or her college education. We believe that life insurance (first sector product) provides further opportunities for us to sell ourinternal cancer and benefits for treatment received due to internal cancer such as fixed daily benefits for hospitalization, outpatient services and convalescent care, surgical benefits, and outpatient treatments. Aflac Japan has a unique Aflac-branded cancer insurance product for Japan's postal system, Japan Post (see the Distribution - Japan section for background information). In April 2018, Aflac Japan introduced a new cancer insurance product, DAYS 1, with enhanced cancer benefits. In addition to providing benefits for hospitalization, outpatient treatment, surgery, radiation therapy and anti-cancer drug treatment, this product was designed to provide benefits to improve quality of life and to cover out-of-pocket expenses not directly related to medical treatment. At the same time, Aflac Japan introduced DAYS 1 Plus to provide existing holders with up-to-date coverage. As the number one provider of cancer insurance (third sector products) through cross-selling opportunities.in Japan, the Company believes these products further strengthen its brand, and most importantly, provide valuable benefits to consumers who are looking for solutions to manage cancer-related costs.
In early 2002, we introduced
Aflac Japan's EVER product is a stand-alone, whole-life medical insurance product which offers a basic level of hospitalization coverage with an affordable premium. Since its initial introduction, we have expanded our suiteThe current version of EVERthis product offerings to appeal to specific types of Japanese consumers and achieve greater market penetration. The most recent upgrade to our EVER product, released in June 2015, includedincludes riders to be associated with three critical illnesses (cancer, strokeheart attack, and heart attack)stroke) to better respond to consumer’sconsumers' needs for coverage of serious illnesses. These riders provide policyholders with a benefit upon the diagnosis for those three critical illnesses, waiver of premium payment thereafter and unlimited hospital days for such critical illnesses. Since its initial introduction, Aflac Japan has expanded its suite of EVER product offerings to appeal to specific types of Japanese consumers and achieve greater market penetration. In 2017, Aflac Japan revised the EVER product by introducing riders for lump-sum hospitalization benefits and surgeries for female-specific diseases as well as strengthening outpatient benefits and reducing premiums centered on the young- to middle-aged market segments. This product also offers a short-pay premium period to policyholders. Gentle EVER, ourAflac Japan's non-standard medical insurance product, iswas designed to meet the needs of certain consumers who cannot qualify for ourthe base EVER plan. An upgrade to our Gentle EVER product, released in July 2012, included expanded benefits and an attached advanced medical care rider.We continue to believe that the entire medical category will remain an important part of our product portfolio in Japan.


Aflac pioneered the cancer insurance market in Japan in 1974, and we remain the number one provider of cancer insurance today. Over the years, we’ve customized our cancer product to respond to, and anticipate, the needs of our consumers and the advances in medical treatments. The cancer insurance plans we offer in Japan provide a lump-sum benefit upon initial diagnosis of internal cancer and benefits for treatment received due to internal cancer such as fixed daily benefits for hospitalization, outpatient services and convalescent care, and surgical and terminal care benefits. In September 2014,October 2018, Aflac Japan introduced New Cancer DAYS,launched a new cancertype of medical product which provides enhanced coverage, including outpatient treatmentsreferred to as Health Promotion Medical Insurance where a policyholder is entitled to a partial refund of the premium if the policyholders' “health age” measured by certain health check items is lower than his or her actual age. This product is marketed exclusively online and multiple cancer occurrence benefits. At the same time, premiums for this product have been lowered for most ages compared to prior plans. In October 2014, Aflac Japan introduced a unique Aflac-branded cancer product for Japan Post (see the Distribution - Japan and Regulation - Japan sections for background information). As the number one provider of cancer insurance in Japan, we believe these products further strengthen our brand, and most importantly, provide valuable benefits to consumers who are looking for solutions to manage cancer-related costs. We are convincedtargeted at younger generations.

The Company believes that the affordable cancer and medical insurance products Aflac Japan provides will continue to be an important part of ourits product portfolio. Nevertheless, as the Company continues its long history of product innovation, Aflac Japan's product portfolio has expanded beyond traditional health-related products.


We also offerAflac Japan's Income Support Insurance provides fixed-benefit amounts in the event that a policyholder is unable to work due to significant illness or injury and was developed to supplement the disability coverage within Japan’s social security system. This product targets young to middle-aged consumers, and by focusing efforts on this demographic, Aflac Japan believes it is building relationships that lay the groundwork for the sale of its cancer and medical insurance later in life to the Income Support policyholders.

Beginning in 2013, Aflac Japan began to curtail sales of first sector savings-type products, such as WAYS, child endowment and fixed annuities, due to persistent low interest rates in Japan and, in particular, the relatively large capital commitment required by such products and their lower profitability, in such an environment. Aflac Japan continues to sell first sector protection-type products, which include term and whole life, to provide Aflac Japan’s traditional fixed-income annuities and care policies. sales channels with a more comprehensive product portfolio to continue to cross-sell with third sector products. In July 2018, Aflac Japan introduced a first sector protection whole life product with low cash surrender value, which offers non-smoking policyholders further discounted premiums.

For additional information on Aflac Japan's products and composition of sales, see the Aflac Japan Segment subsection of MD&A in this report.
Insurance Products -

3





U.S.
We design ourThe Company designs its U.S. insurance products to provide supplemental coverage for people who already have major medical or primary insurance coverage. Most of ourAflac's U.S. policies are individually underwritten and marketed through independent agents. Additionally, weAflac U.S. started to market and administer group insurance products in 2009.
Our individually issued
Aflac U.S. insurance policies are portable and pay benefits regardless of other insurance. Most products'of the Aflac U.S. insurance benefits are paid in cash directly to policyholders; therefore, our customers have the opportunity to use this cash to help with expenses of their choosing. Our individually issued health insurance plans are typically guaranteed-renewable for the lifetime of the policyholder (to age 75 for short-term disability policies). Our group insurance policies are underwritten on a group basis and often have some element of guaranteed issue.

Aflac U.S. offers accident coverage on both an individual and group basis. These policies are designed to protect against losses resulting from accidents.pay cash benefits in the event of a covered injury. The accident portion of the policy includes lump-sum benefits for accidental death, dismemberment and specific injuries as well as fixed benefits for hospital confinement. In 2015, we introduced a new individual accident plan with newAdditional benefits are also available for home modifications, improved wellness benefits and a new benefit that provides an additional payoutincreased benefits for injuries related to participations in an organized sporting activity.



3



Aflac U.S. offers short-term disability benefits on both an individual and group basis. In 2013, we introduced a completely redesigned groupThe individual short-term disability product with enhancedhas an Aflac Value Rider that pays a benefit, options and higher income replacement amounts. In 2014, this group short-term disability product was introducedless claims, for every consecutive five-year term that the policy is in additional states, formally completing the active launch of the product to the U.S. market.force.


Aflac U.S. offers coverage for critical illnessescare on both an individual and group basis. These policies are designed to protect against losses resulting frompay cash benefits in the event of critical illnesses such as heart attack, stroke, or cancer. On an individually underwritten basis, we offerAflac U.S. offers cancer plans, critical illness plans, and critical care and recovery plans (formerly called specified health event). On a group basis we offerAflac U.S. offers critical illness plans. In 2015, an updated group critical illness plan was introduced that provides benefits for 30 additional conditions in addition to more consumer options.

Aflac U.S. offers hospital indemnity coverage on both an individual and group basis. Our hospitalHospital indemnity products provide policyholders fixed dollar benefits triggered by hospitalization due to accident or sickness, or just sickness alone. Indemnity benefits for inpatient and outpatient surgeries, as well as various other diagnostic events, are also available. WeAflac U.S. also offeroffers a lump sum rider thanthat can be added to ourits individual accident, short-term disability and hospital indemnity products. This rider, may not bewhere available, on all products in all states. This rider provides a lump sum payment for a range of critical illness events including traumatic brain injury, Type 1 diabetes, advanced Alzheimer’s disease and many more. In January 2016, a new group hospital indemnity plan was introduced that includes 11 new benefits, including telemedicine and health screening. This plan provides flexibility, allowing ourthe Company's clients to personalize their plan designs to complement the underlying medical coverage that is offered to employees.


Aflac U.S. also offers additional coverages to those listed above, including dental, vision and life policies. Aflac U.S. offers fixed-benefit dental coverage on both an individual and group basis. Aflac U.S. offers Vision NowSM, an individually issued policy which provides benefits for serious eye health conditions and loss of sight as well as coverage for corrective eye materials and exam benefits. Aflac U.S. also offers termterm- and whole-life policies on both an individual and group basis.


For additional information on Aflac's U.S. products and composition of sales, see the Aflac U.S. Segment subsection of MD&A in this report.

Distribution - Channels
Aflac JapanAflac U.S.
Individual/ Independent Corporate Agencies

Independent Associates


Affiliated Corporate AgenciesBrokers
Banks

Japan

The traditional channels through which we haveAflac Japan has sold ourits products areconsist of individual agents/agencies, independent corporate agencies, individual agencies, and affiliated corporate agencies. The individual agencies and independent corporate agencies and individual agencies that sell ourAflac Japan's products give us better access to workers at a vast number of small businesses in Japan. Agents' activities are primarily focused on insurance sales, with customer service support provided by the Aflac Contact Center. Independent corporate agencies and individual agencies contributed 47.0% of new annualized premium sales in 2015, compared with 46.1% in 2014 and 43.8% in 2013. Affiliated corporate agencies are originallyinitially formed when companies establish subsidiary businesses to sell ourAflac Japan's insurance products to their employees as part of a benefit package, and thenin some cases expand to sell ourAflac Japan products to other parties such as suppliers and customers. Thesecustomers.These agencies help usAflac Japan reach employees at large

4





worksites, and some of them are also successful in approaching customers outside their business groups. Affiliated corporate agencies, which include Japan Post, contributed 35.4% of new annualized premium sales in 2015, compared with 30.0% in 2014 and 23.1% in 2013. During 2015, we recruited more than 300 new sales agencies. As of December 31, 2015, Aflac Japan was represented by approximately 13,100 sales agencies, with approximately 114,000 licensed sales associates employed by those agencies. We believeThe Company believes that new agencies will continue to be attracted to Aflac Japan's competitive commissions, attractive products, superior customer service and strong brand image.


We haveThe Company has sold our products to employees of banks since ourits entry into Japan in 1974. However, December 2007 marked the first time it was permissible for banks to sell ourAflac Japan's type of insurance products to their customers. By the end of 2015, we2018, Aflac Japan had agreements with 372 banks, approximately 90% of the total number of banks in Japan, to sell ourits products. We believe we haveThe Company believes Aflac Japan has more banks selling ourits supplemental health insurance products than any of ourits competitors. Japanese consumers rely on banks to provide traditional bank services, and also to provide insurance solutions and other services. We believe ourThe Company believes Aflac Japan's long-standing and strong relationships within the Japanese banking sector, along with ourits strategic preparations, have proven to be an advantage, particularly starting when this channel opened up for ourits products. OurAflac Japan's partnerships throughout the banking sector provide usAflac Japan with a wider demographic of potential customers than weit would otherwise have been able to reach, and it also allows banks to expand their product and service offerings to consumers. Banks contributed 14.9%
In 2005, legislation aimed at privatizing Japan's postal system (Japan Post) was enacted into law. The privatization laws split Japan Post into four operating entities that began operating in October 2007. In 2007, one of these entities selected Aflac Japan new annualized premium salesas its provider of cancer insurance to be sold through its post offices, and, in 2015, compared with 21.5% in 2014 and 31.3% in 2013.

2008, Aflac Japan andbegan selling cancer insurance through these post offices. Japan Post Holdingshas historically been a popular place for consumers to purchase insurance products. Legislation to reform the postal system passed Japan’s legislature, the Diet, in April 2012 and resulted in the merger of two of the postal operating entities (the one that delivers the mail and the one that runs the post offices) in October 2012. In July 2013, Aflac Japan entered into a new agreement in July 2013,with Japan Post Holdings to further expanding aexpand the partnership

4



that was established in 2008 (see Regulation-Japan). At the end of2008. In June 2014, Japan Post Insurance (Kampo) received approval from Japan’s primary insurance regulator, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) regulatory approval, to enter into an agency contract with Aflac Japan. Under this contract, Aflac Japan to begin distributing Aflac Japan'scurrently distributes its cancer insurance products at allthrough 76 of Kampo's 79 directly managed sales offices. Aflac Japan has developed a unique Aflac-branded cancer insurance product for Japan Post and Kampo that was introduced onin October 1, 2014. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the number of postal outlets selling our cancer products expanded to approximately 10,000, and starting July 1, 2015, Japan Post expanded the number of post offices that offer Aflac's cancer insurance products to more than 20,000 postal outlets. We believe
The Company believes this alliance with Japan Post, which is included in Aflac Japan's affiliated corporate agencies distribution channel, has benefited and will furthercontinue to benefit ourAflac Japan's cancer insurance sales. For example, sales of cancer insurance policies by Japan Post constituted approximately 25% of Aflac Japan's third sector sales during the 2018 calendar year. In December 2018, the Company announced that in a further strengthening of this alliance. Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd, a Japanese corporation, (Japan Post Holdings) plans to purchase approximately 7% of the Parent Company's outstanding common shares through a trust using open market and private block purchases. Like all common shares in the Parent Company, the shares purchased by the trust will be eligible for 10-for-1 voting rights after being held for 48 consecutive months. In connection with this announcement, on December 19, 2018, the Parent Company and Aflac Japan entered into a Basic Agreement regarding the "Strategic Alliance Based on Capital Relationship" with Japan Post Holdings (Basic Agreement), and the Parent Company entered into a letter agreement with Japan Post Holdings (Letter Agreement). Under the Letter Agreement, Japan Post Holdings agreed (i) to establish and fund a voting trust in accordance with a trust agreement (Trust Agreement) by no later than February 28, 2019, (ii) upon establishment of the trust, to instruct the trustee and the sole shareholder of the trust to enter into, and to itself enter into, a shareholders agreement with the Parent Company (Shareholders Agreement) providing for, among other things, a cap on share ownership, a minimum holding period and a standstill provision and voting restrictions that effectively limit the trustee's voting rights to no more than 20% of the voting rights of the Parent Company and further restrict the trustee's voting rights with respect to certain change in control transactions. The terms of the investment do not provide Japan Post Holdings with a right to a board seat on the Parent Company's board of directors or with any other rights to control, manage or intervene in the management of the Parent Company. This strategic investment is subject to certain regulatory approvals in Japan, and the U.S. The Company anticipates that regulatory approvals will be received in the second half of 2019. The foregoing summary is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Basic Agreement and Letter Agreement, including the forms of Trust Agreement and Shareholders Agreement attached to the Letter Agreement, copies of which are included as Exhibits 10.47 and 10.48 attached hereto and the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference.


For additional information on Aflac Japan's distribution, see the Aflac Japan Segment subsection of MD&A in this report.
Distribution -
5





U.S.
As of December 31, 2015, our2018, the U.S. sales force was composed of sales associates and brokers who are licensed to sell accident and health insurance. Many are also licensed to sell life insurance. Aflac U.S. utilizes dual-channel distribution to market its insurance products to businesses of all sizes. The career agent channel focuses on marketing Aflac to the small business market, which consists of employers with less than 100 employees. As such, Aflac U.S. has aligned its recruiting, training, compensation, marketing and incentives for its career agents to encourage specific activity and sales of individual policies in this market. The broker channel focuses on selling to the mid- and large-case market, which is comprised of employers with more than 100 employees and typically an average size of 1,000 employees or more. Since regional and national brokers have traditionally served the mid- and large-case market, the sales professionals in the broker channel are assigned a geographic market to strengthen relationships with the top brokers and sell Aflac products to their clients. As a result, Aflac U.S. is represented on 160 benefit administration platforms, sometimes referred to as exchanges, of various brokers.


Sales associates and brokers are independent contractors and are paid commissions based on first-year and renewal premiums from their sales of insurance products. In addition to receiving commissions on personal production, district and regional sales coordinators may also receive override commissions and incentive bonuses.
Beginning in the third quarter and continuing into the fourth quarter of 2014,
Aflac U.S. implemented tactical initiatives centered around providing competitive compensationhas continued to our sales hierarchyevolve its career and positioning usbroker management infrastructure to more effectivelydrive growth in sales. In 2017, Aflac hired a Chief Distribution Officer to align the strategies of career and consistently execute on thebroker channels and to further expand U.S. distribution. All Aflac U.S. sales strategy across all states. These measureschannels are now within the organizational structure of the Chief Distribution Officer. Prior to this change, the broker and career channels were designed to more effectively link sales management's success to Aflac's success. For example, we enhanced compensation through an incentive bonus forpart of separate organizational structures. Aflac U.S. believes the first leveladdition of our sales management, district sales coordinators, who are primarily responsible for selling Aflac products and training new sales associates. Additionally, we eliminated the commission-based position of state sales coordinator. To better manage our state operations, we introduced the new position of market director, effective October 1, 2014. Market directors are salaried with the opportunity to earn sales-related bonuses. We believe these changes have enhanced andthis role will continue to enhance performance management and better align compensation with new business results.augment its long-term sales strategy.


We concentrateAflac U.S. concentrates on marketing ourits insurance products at the worksite. This method offers policies to individuals through employment, trade and other associations. Historically, ourAflac U.S. policies have been individually underwritten, with premiumshowever over the past several years, guaranteed issue options have become available. Premiums are generally paid by the employee. Additionally, Aflac's individual policies are portable, meaning that individuals may retain their full insurance coverage upon separation from employment or such affiliation, generally at the same premium. We collectIndividual policies are typically guaranteed-renewable for the lifetime of the policyholder (to age 75 for short-term disability policies). Aflac U.S. collects a major portion of premiums on such sales through payroll deduction or other forms of centralized billing. With ourAflac U.S. brokerage sales expansion and CAIC, branded as Aflac Group Insurance, we offerAflac U.S. offers group voluntary insurance products desired by many large employers. These products are sold on a group basis and often have some element of guaranteed issue. Worksite marketing enables sales associates and brokers to reach a greater number of prospective policyholders and lowers distribution costs, compared with individually marketed business.

Aflac U.S. utilizes dual-channel distribution to market our insurance products to businesses of all sizes. Our career agent channel focuses on marketing Aflac to the small business market, which consists of employers with less than 100 employees. As such, we have aligned our recruiting, training, compensation, marketing and incentives for our career agents to encourage specific activity and sales of individual policies in this market. Our newest channel is the broker channel, which is a sales division of Aflac Group. The broker channel focuses on selling to the mid- and large-case market, which is comprised of employers with more than 100 employees and typically an average size of 1,000 employees or more. Since regional and national brokers have traditionally served the mid- and large-case market, the highly trained and experienced sales professionals of the broker channel are assigned a geographic market to strengthen relationships with the top brokers and sell Aflac products to their clients. As a result, we are represented on more than 80 benefit administration platforms, sometimes referred to as exchanges, of various brokers.


For additional information on Aflac's U.S. distribution, see the Aflac U.S. Segment subsection of MD&A in this report.

5Competition



Competition - Japan
In 1974, Aflac was granted an operating license to sell life insurance in Japan, making Aflac the second non-Japanese life insurance company to gain direct access to the Japanese insurance market. Through 1981, weAflac Japan faced limited competition for cancer insurance policy sales. However, Japan has experienced two periods of deregulation since weAflac Japan entered the market. The first came in the early 1980s, when nine mid-sized insurers, including domestic and foreign companies, were allowed to sell cancer insurance products for the first time. The second period began in 2001 when all life and non-life insurers were allowed to sell stand-alone cancer and medical insurance products as well as other stand-alone health insurance products. As a result, the number of insurance companies offering stand-alone cancer and medical insurance has more than doubled since the market was deregulated in 2001. However, based on ourAflac Japan's growth of annualized premiums in force and agencies, we dodiversified distribution network, the Company does not believe that ourAflac Japan's market-leading position has been significantly impacted by increased competition. Furthermore, we believethe Company believes the continued development and maintenance of operating efficiencies will allow usAflac Japan to offer affordable products that appeal to consumers. Aflac Japan is the largest life insurer in Japan in terms of cancer and medical policies in force. As of December 31, 2015, we2018, Aflac Japan exceeded 2324 million individual policies in force in Japan.


Aflac Japan has hadexperienced substantial success selling cancer policies in Japan, with more than 1415 millioncancer policies in force as of December 31, 2015.2018. Aflac Japan continued to be the number one seller of cancer insurance policies in Japan throughout 2015. We believe we2018. The Company believes Aflac Japan will remain a leading provider of cancer insurance

6





coverage in Japan, principally due to ourits experience in the market, well-known brand, low-cost operations, expansive marketing system (see Distribution - Japan above) and product expertise. Further, the Company believes that its alliance with Japan Post will continue to benefit Aflac Japan's sales of cancer insurance in Japan. (See Distribution-Japan above for more information on Aflac Japan's marketing system and its alliance with Japan Post.)


We haveAflac Japan has also experienced substantial success selling medical insurance in Japan. While other companies have recognized the opportunities that we haveAflac Japan has seen in the medical insurance market and offeredare frequently offering new products, we endeavor to make our products stand out for their value to consumers.

In addition to third sector products, Aflac Japan sells lifeendeavors to keep its products attractive to consumers by revising benefits of medical insurance products such as WAYS (described in the Products section of this report). The market for ordinary life products of this kind is highly competitive. We will continue to pursue the development and marketing of specialty products that meet specific needs within the general life insurance market.more frequently than cancer insurance.


Competition - U.S.

Aflac U.S. competes against several voluntary supplemental insurance carriers on a national and regional basis. We believe ourAflac U.S. believes its policies, premium rates, platforms, value-added services and sales commissions are competitive by product type. Moreover, we believeAflac U.S. believes that Aflacits products are distinct from competitive offerings given ourits product focus (including features, benefits, and ourits claims service model), distribution capabilities, and brand awareness. For many companies with which we compete,Aflac U.S. competes, voluntary supplemental insurance products are sold as a secondary business. A growing number of major medical and life insurance carriers are also entering into the voluntary supplemental insurance market. For Aflac U.S., supplemental insurance products are ourits primary business and are sold via a large distribution network of independent sales associates and brokers (see U.S. Distribution - U.S. above). Aflac'sIn addition, the Company believes that advertising campaigns for Aflac U.S. have increased our name awareness and understanding byamong consumers and businesses of the value ourits products provide.


Both private and publicly-traded insurers offer major medical insurance for hospitalization and medical expenses. Much of this insurance is sold on a group basis to accounts that are both fully and self-insured. The federal and state governments also pay substantial costs of medical treatment through various programs. Major medical insurance generally covers a substantial portion of the medical expenses incurred by an insured. Aflac policies are designed to provide coverage that supplements major medical insurance by paying cash directly to the policyholder to use for expenses their major medical insurance is not designed to cover.cover, or for any other uses that the policyholder chooses. Thus, we doAflac U.S. does not compete directly with major medical insurers except those who sell supplemental insurance products as a secondary business. Any reduction of coverage, increase in employee participation costs, or increased deductibles and copayments by major medical commercial or government insurance carriers could favorably affect ourAflac U.S. business opportunities. Since the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA),beginning in 2010, some employers have shifted a larger burden of the cost of care to their employees, primarily through increases in premiums, copays, and/or deductibles. deductibles, such as through the use of high-deductible health plans. In addition, the Company believes that some employers have made increasing use of supplemental insurance product offerings in order to improve their competitiveness in employee recruitment and retention.

Since Aflac products provide an additional level of financial protection for policyholders, we believethe Company believes the increased financial exposure some employees may face creates a favorable opportunity for ourAflac U.S. products. Further,However, given the profitability erosion some major medical carriers are facing in their core lines of business, we havethe Company has seen a more competitive landscape as they seek entry into Aflac's supplemental product segments and leverage their core benefit offerings by bundling and discounting products in an effortorder to offset this impact.gain voluntary market share.


One Day PaySM is a claims initiative that we haveAflac U.S. introduced at Aflac U.S.in 2015 to process, approve and pay eligible claims in just one day. We believeThe Company believes that along with ourits brand and relevant products, this claims practice has helped Aflac stand out from competitors.

6





Investments

Effective January 1, 2018, investments of Aflac U.S. as well as certain sub-advised assets of Aflac Japan, are managed by the Company’s U.S. asset management subsidiary, Aflac Asset Management LLC (AAM), and Investment Results
Netinvestments of Aflac Japan are managed pursuant to an investment income was $3.1 billion in 2015 and $3.3 billion in both 2014 and 2013. The decrease in the reported net investment income in U.S. dollar terms for 2015 was primarily due to a weakening of the weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate when compared to previous periods. In addition, a reduction in investable cash flows and lower investment yields for new purchases in bothadvisory agreement between Aflac Japan and the United States have hamperedCompany's asset management subsidiary in Japan, Aflac Asset Management Japan Ltd. (AAMJ). AAMJ is licensed as a discretionary asset manager under the growth rateJapan Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and is subject to rules of netthe Japan Investment Advisors Association, a self-regulatory organization with mandatory membership for Japan investment managers. Beginning with the first quarter of 2018, AAM and AAMJ are reported in the "Corporate and other segment" category; however, the assets that they manage will be reported in the respective Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. business segments.


7





Japan

The Company’s investment strategy with respect to Aflac Japan utilizes disciplined asset and liability management while seeking diversification, long-term risk-adjusted investment returns and the delivery of stable income within regulatory and capital objectives, as well as preserving shareholder value in the Aflac Japan business.

In attempting to optimally balance these objectives, the Company seeks to maintain on behalf of Aflac Japan a diversified portfolio of yen-denominated investment assets, U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio hedged back to yen and a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated assets. Each of these portfolios presents unique benefits and risks to the Company.

Yen-denominated investments included in Aflac Japan’s portfolio primarily consist of Japan Government Bonds (JGB), other public bonds and private placement fixed income instruments. The Company attempts to match both the duration and currency of these assets with Aflac Japan’s liabilities. This poses a difficulty in Aflac Japan due to the lack of suitable long-dated yen-denominated fixed income instruments. In 2012, the Company initiated a strategic approach to include U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan’s portfolio with the initial intent that they would be coupled with foreign exchange hedges. Today, this hedged U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio is mainly invested in long-term fixed and floating-rate loans and long-term investment-grade fixed income securities. The primary goals of the yen-denominated and hedged U.S. dollar portfolios are to provide sufficient yen cash flows to support the insurance liabilities and other yen-denominated obligations of Aflac Japan, and to seek appropriate long-term risk-adjusted investment returns supportive of solvency margin ratio (SMR) levels that provide sufficient dividend flows to the Parent Company. The hedges supporting this portion of the U.S. dollar portfolio pose derivative rollover risk that could amplify hedge costs in unfavorable market conditions, risk of counterparty default, and may require the Company to post collateral. In a declining yen environment, these hedges could result in negative cash settlements that may significantly increase liquidity requirements, thereby shifting funds away from other capital management opportunities including loss of investment income. If the combined yen-denominated and hedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolios are larger than Aflac Japan's yen obligations, the economic value of these portfolios may be eroded under a long-term scenario of weakening yen due to foreign currency translation risk, one result of which may be to reduce the Company's dividend capacity.

The Company also maintains an unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio with the objectives of generating enhanced investment returns and mitigating certain of the risks posed by the yen and hedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolios as outlined above. Further, the Company has determined that the unhedged portfolio acts as a natural economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company’s investment in Aflac Japan against erosion of economic value. However, the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio creates an unmatched foreign currency exposure and subjects Aflac Japan to volatility in regulatory capital and earnings, which may adversely impact Aflac Japan’s ability to pay dividends to the Parent Company. The Company’s approach to sizing the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio seeks to balance the unique risks presented by each of the three portfolios outlined above, but the overall investment strategy in Aflac Japan is guided primarily by the objective of securing the long-term financial strength of Aflac Japan and funding of yen liabilities. As a result, the Company has historically maintained and currently maintains the size of the unhedged portfolio at levels below the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan.

The determination of stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan involves multiple models using multiple statistical approaches and assuming various economic and operating scenarios that are stressed to arrive at a range of potential outcomes. This range does not account for all economic scenarios, some of which may result in values outside of the range. The Company periodically assesses the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan, which fluctuates over time, and adjusts the size of the unhedged portfolio accordingly. The portfolio may include medium-term and long-term fixed-rate government and corporate (investment-grade and high-yield) bonds, floating-rate loans, public equities, and alternative asset classes. In 2015, we continueddetermining the composition of the portfolio, the Company also considers diversification, hedge cost, investment returns relative to addressyen-denominated investment yields, and Aflac Japan capital requirements. At December 31, 2018, this unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolio was approximately $14.4 billion, compared with approximately $13.0 billion at December 31, 2017. For additional discussion of business and market risks associated with the challengeCompany’s investment strategy in Japan, refer to the Risk Factors and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk sections.

U.S.

The Company’s investment strategy with respect to Aflac U.S. utilizes disciplined asset and liability management while seeking long-term risk-adjusted investment returns and the delivery of stable income within regulatory and capital objectives. As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac U.S. invests in fixed-maturity investments and growth assets, including public equities and alternative investments in limited partnerships.

8





Aflac U.S. has been investing in this low-interest-rate environment by increasing our allocation to higher yielding asset classes, while still adhering to our strategic asset allocation. both publicly traded and privately originated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loans.

For further information on ourthe Company's investments and investment results, see the Insurance Operations and Analysis of Financial Condition sections of MD&A and Notes 3, 4 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.


Regulation -

Japan


The financial and business affairs of Aflac Japan are subject to examination by Japan's FSA. Aflac Japan files annual reports and financial statements for the Japanese insurance operations based on a March 31 fiscal year end, prepared in accordance with Japanese regulatory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the FSA. Japanese regulatory basis earnings are determined using accounting principles that differ materially from U.S. GAAP. For example, under Japanese regulatory accounting practices, policy acquisition costs are expensed immediately; policy benefit and claim reserving methods and assumptions are different; premium income is recognized on a cash basis; different consolidation criteria apply to variable interest entities (VIEs); different accounting applies to reinsurance; and investments can have a separate accounting classification and treatment referred to as policy reserve matching bonds (PRM)., which are recorded at amortized cost. Capital and surplus of Aflac Japan, based on Japanese regulatory accounting practices, was $4.7$6.4 billion at December 31, 2015,2018, compared with $5.6$6.7 billion at December 31, 2014.2017.


The FSA maintains a solvency standard, which is used by Japanese regulators to monitor the financial strength of insurance companies. As of December 31, 2015,2018, Aflac Japan's solvency margin ratio (SMR)SMR was 828%965%, compared with 857%1,064% at December 31, 2014.2017. Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread and foreign exchange rate changes. See the Capital Resources and Liquidity Section of MD&A for a discussion of measures we havethe Company has taken to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR.


We typically repatriatePrior to April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan repatriated a portion of Aflac Japan'sits accumulated earnings, as determined on a Japanese regulatory accounting basis, to Aflac U.S. provided that Aflac Japan has determined that it adequately protected policyholders' interests as measured by its SMR. The FSA may not allow profit repatriations to Aflac U.S. ifStarting in the transfers would causefourth quarter of 2018, Aflac Japan to lack sufficient financial strength for the protection of Japanese policyholders. In the near term, we do not expect these requirements to adversely affect the funds available for profit repatriations, nor do we expect these requirements to adversely affect the funds available for payments of allocated expenses to Aflac U.S. and management feesdistributes dividends to the Parent Company. Such dividends are subject to permitted dividend capacity under the Japan Company Law.
In 2005, legislation aimed at privatizing Japan's postal system (Japan Post) was enacted into law. The privatization laws split Japan Post into four operating entities that began operating in October 2007. In 2007, one of these entities selected Aflac Japan as its provider of cancer insurance to be sold through its post offices, and, in 2008, we began selling cancer insurance through these post offices. Japan Post has historically been a popular place for consumers to purchase insurance products. Legislation to reform the postal system passed the Diet in April 2012 and resulted in the merger of two of the postal operating entities (the one that delivers the mail and the one that runs the post offices) on October 1, 2012. In July 2013, Aflac Japan entered into a new agreement with Japan Post Holdings to further expand a partnership that was established in 2008. See the Distribution-Japan section for further developments in 2015.


The Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection corporation that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. For additional information regarding the policyholder protection fund, see the Policyholder Protection subsection of MD&A in this report.
In June 2013, a revision to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act established a post-funded Orderly Resolution Regime for financial institutions to prevent a financial crisis in the event of a financial institution’s failure. This regime came into effect in March 2014 and has not had, and is not expected to have, a material impact on the Company's operations in Japan.


As a branch of our principal insurance subsidiary, Aflac Japan is also subject to regulation and supervision in the United States (see Regulation - U.S.). For additional information regarding Aflac Japan's operations and regulations, see

7



the Aflac Japan Segment subsection of MD&A and Notes 2 and 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.


Regulation - U.S.
General
The Parent Company and its U.S. insurance subsidiaries, Aflac (a Nebraska-domiciled insurance company), American Family Life Assurance Company of New York (Aflac New York, a New York-domiciled insurance company), CAIC (redomiciled from South Carolina to Nebraska effective December 2016) and CAIC (a South Carolina-domiciledTier One Insurance Company (TOIC, an Oklahoma-domiciled shell insurance company)company acquired by the Parent Company in 2017 with no operations) are subject to state regulations in the United States as an insurance holding company system. Such regulations generally provide that transactions between companies within the holding company system must be fair and equitable. In addition, transfers of assets among such affiliated companies, certain dividend payments from insurance subsidiaries, and material transactions between companies within the system, including management fees, loans and advances are subject to prior notice to, or approval by, state regulatory authorities. These laws generally require, among other things, the insurance holding company and each insurance company directly owned by the holding company to register with the insurance departments of their respective domiciliary states and to furnish annually financial and other information about the

9





operations of companies within the holding company system.
Like all U.S. insurance companies, Aflac, isAflac New York, CAIC and TOIC are subject to regulation and supervision in the jurisdictions in which it doesthey do business. In general, the insurance laws of the various jurisdictions establish supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers relating to, among other things:
granting and revoking licenses to transact business
regulating trade and claims practices
licensing of insurance agents and brokers
approval of policy forms and premium rates
standards of solvency and maintenance of specified policy benefit reserves and minimum loss ratio requirements
capital requirements
limitations on dividends to shareholders
the nature of and limitations on investments
deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders
filing of financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory insurance accounting practices prescribed or permitted by regulatory authorities
periodic examinations of the market conduct, financial, and other affairs of insurance companies
The insurance laws of Nebraska that govern Aflac's activities provide that the acquisition or change of “control” of a domestic insurer or of any person that controls a domestic insurer cannot be consummated without the prior approval of the Nebraska Department of Insurance. A person seeking to acquire control, directly or indirectly, of a domestic insurance company or of any person controlling a domestic insurance company (in the case of Aflac, the Parent Company) must generally file with the Nebraska Department of Insurance (NEDOI)(NDOI) an application for change of control containing certain information required by statute and published regulations and provide a copy to Aflac. In Nebraska, control is generally presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, acquires 10% or more of an insurance company or of any other person or entity controlling the insurance company. The 10% presumption is not conclusive and control may be found to exist at less than 10%. Similar laws apply in New York, and South Carolina, the domiciliary jurisdictionsjurisdiction of the Parent Company's other insurance subsidiaries, AflacAflac's New York and CAIC.insurance subsidiary.
State insurance departments conduct periodic examinations of the books and records, financial reporting, policy filings and market conduct of insurance companies domiciled in their states, generally once every three to five years. Examinations are generally carried out in cooperation with the insurance departments of other states under guidelines promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). In 2013,2016, full-scope, risk-focused financial examinations were conducted by the Nebraska insurance regulator, along with theNDOI, New York insurance regulator, completed a coordinated risk-focused full scope financial examination for the four-year period and three-year period, respectively, ended December 31, 2011 for Aflac and Aflac New York as partDepartment of the normal examination process. These examinations found no material deficiencies. Also, in 2011 the South Carolina insurance regulator completed a risk-focused full scope financial examination for the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 for CAIC as part of the normal examination process and found no material deficiencies. In 2016, the Nebraska and New York insurance regulators will commence a routine examination of the four-year period ended December 31, 2015,Financial Services (NYDFS), and the South Carolina Department of Insurance (SCDOI) on their state domiciled insurance regulator will commenceentities American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, American Family Life Assurance Company of New York, and Continental American Insurance Company, respectively. The NDOI and NYDFS exams covered a routine examination offour-year period ending December 31, 2015, whereas the SCDOI exam covered a five-year period endedending December 31, 2015. There were no material findings contained in the NDOI, NYDFS and SCDOI final exam reports. 


8



The NAIC continually reviews regulatory matters, such as risk-based capital (RBC) modernization, (Operational Riskgroup capital calculations, liquidity risk assessment and C-1 Investment Risk) and principles-basedprinciple-based reserving. The NAIC has adopted a valuation manual containing a principle-based approach to calculation of life insurance reserves. The valuation manual became effective January 1, 2017. There is a three-year transition period, beginning January 1, 2017, during which companies can choose on a product by product basis to implement principle-based reserving and recommends changes and revisions for new business. The Company anticipates that the adoption by state legislators and insurance departments.of this manual will not cause a material impact on the statutory reserves of Aflac, Aflac New York or CAIC. The NAIC uses a risk-based capitalan RBC formula relating to insurance risk, business risk, asset risk and interest rate risk to facilitate identification by insurance regulators of inadequately capitalized insurance companies based upon the types and mix of risk inherent in the insurer's operations. The formulas for determining the amount of risk-based capitalRBC specify various weighting factors that are applied to financial balances or various levels of activity based on the perceived degree of risk. Regulatory compliance is determined by a ratio of a company's regulatory total adjusted capital to its authorized control level risk-based capitalRBC as defined by the NAIC. Companies below specific trigger points or ratios are classified within certain levels, each of which requires specified corrective action. The levels are company action, regulatory action, authorized control, and mandatory control. Aflac's NAIC risk-based capital ratio remains high and reflects a very strong capital and surplus position. As of December 31, 2015,2018, based on year-end statutory accounting results, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 933%560%.

Federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas, including health care reform legislation, financial services reform legislation, securities regulation, pension regulation, privacy, tort reform legislation and taxation, can significantly and adversely affect insurance companies. Various forms of federal oversight and regulation of insurance have been passed by the The 2018 RBC as filed is lower than Aflac U.S. Congress and signed into law by the president. For example, the ACA, federal health care reform legislation, gives the U.S. federal government direct regulatory authority over the business of health insurance. The reform includes major changesstand-alone RBC due to the U.S. health care insurance marketplace. Among other changes, the reform legislation includes an individual medical insurance coverage mandate, provides for penalties on certain employers for failing to provide adequate coverage, creates health insurance exchanges, and addresses coverage and exclusions as well as medical loss ratios. The legislation also includes changes in government reimbursements and tax credits for individuals and employers and alters federal and state regulation of health insurers. These changes, directed toward major medical health insurance coverage which Aflac does not offer, will continue to be implemented over the next several years. While the ACA was enacted in 2010, the major elements of the law became effective on January 1, 2014. We believe that the ACA, as enacted, does not materially affect the design of our insurance products. However, indirect consequences of the legislation and regulations could present challenges and/or opportunities that could potentially have an impact on our sales model, financial condition and results of operations.

On December 18, 2015, the president signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act which included a revision to delay implementation of the Excise Tax on High Cost Plans, better known as the "Cadillac tax.” This tax was originally scheduled to begin in 2017, was previously delayed until 2018, and is now scheduled to begin in 2020. The tax consists of 40% of the cost of employer sponsored health coverage in excess of certain dollar thresholds. In general, only Aflac specified disease and fixed indemnity (i.e. supplemental health) products offered on a pre-tax basis are taken into account under this tax.  

The legislation also makes the tax deductible by the payer. If employers fund coverage on a pre-tax basis, Aflac, as the insurer, would be liable for its pro-rata share of any tax on excess coverage, determined based on the cost of Aflac coverage compared to the total cost of the applicable health coverage in which each employee is enrolled. Making the tax deductible would then reduce the economic impact of any tax that is imposed and payable by Aflac. 

Many employers are concerned about the tax and what impact it will have on benefit offerings in the future. There is confusion in the market about how the tax is calculated and who pays the tax, presenting a risk that some employers will mistakenly conclude thatall supplemental health products are included in the calculation for the tax regardless of pre-tax funding status or whether an employer’s health coverage exceeds the trigger for the tax. Some employers may decide simply to drop coverage of affected supplemental health products, rather than convert it to an after-tax basis. During this extended implementation period, Aflac will be assessing the impact of this tax; educating employers about the tax; and investigating ways to mitigate the impact of the tax. Having employees pay for the coverage on an after-tax basis would exempt affected supplemental health products from the tax.

In 2010, the president signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, commonly known as the Dodd-Frank Act, which, among other things, created a Financial Stability Oversight Council (the Council). In April 2012, the Council released a final rule describing the general process it will follow in determining whether to designate a nonbank financial company for supervision by the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve System (the Board). The Council may designate by a two-thirds vote whether certain nonbank financial companies, including certain insurance companies and insurance holding companies, could pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States, in which case such nonbank financial companies would become subject to prudential regulation by the Board. On April 3, 2013, the Board published a final rule that establishes the requirements for determining when a nonbank financial company is "predominantly engaged in financial activities" - a prerequisite for designation by the Council. Prudential regulation by the Board includes supervision of capital requirements, leverage limits, liquidity requirements and

9



examinations. The Board may limit such company’s ability to enter into mergers, acquisitions and other business combination transactions, restrict its ability to offer financial products, require it to terminate one or more activities, or impose conditions on the manner in which it conducts activities. The Council designated two insurers in 2013 and an additional insurer in 2014 as a Systemically Important Financial Institution (SIFI). On December 18, 2014, the president signed the Insurance Capital Standards Clarification Act into law. This legislation clarifies the Board’s authority to apply insurance-based capital standards for insurance companies subject to federal supervision. Although Aflac is a nonbank financial company predominantly engaged in financial activities as defined in the Dodd-Frank Act, we do not believe Aflac will be considered a company that poses a threat to the financial stability of the United States.
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations issued thereunder may have an impact on Aflac's derivative activity, including activity on behalfinclusion of Aflac Japan in particular rules to require central clearing and collateral for certain types of derivatives. In 2014, the five U.S. banking regulators and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) re-proposed for comment their rules regarding collateral for uncleared swaps. Final rules were issued by the five U.S. banking regulators on October 22, 2015 and by the CFTC on December 16, 2015. Such rules may result in increased collateral requirements or affect other aspects of Aflac's derivatives activity.

The Dodd-Frank Act also established a Federal Insurance Office (FIO) under the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and of lines of business other than certain health insurance, certain long-term care
insurance and crop insurance. Traditionally, U.S. insurance companies have been regulated primarily by state insurance departments. In December 2013, the FIO released a report entitled "How To Modernize And Improve The System Of Insurance Regulation In The United States." The report was required by the Dodd-Frank Act, and included 18 recommended areas of near-term reform for the states, including addressingfirst quarter of 2018. The RBC charge reflects the business risk without any total adjusted capital adequacy(TAC). Aflac's NAIC RBC ratio remains high and safety/soundness issues, reform of insurer resolution practices,reflects a very strong capital and reform of marketplace regulation. The report also listed nine recommended areas for direct federal involvement in insurance regulation. Some of the recommendations outlined in the FIO report released in December 2013 have been implemented. Of the nine recommended areas for direct federal involvement in insurance regulation that are applicable to Aflac, the president has signed the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers Reform Act into law in January 2015, which simplifies the agent and broker licensing process across state lines. The FIO has also engaged with the supervisory colleges to monitor financial stability and identify regulatory gaps for large national and internationally active insurers.surplus position.


The process of implementing the Dodd-Frank Act is ongoing and continues to involve additional rulemaking from time to time. At the current time, it is not possible to predict with any degree of certainty what impact, if any, the Dodd-Frank Act will have on our U.S. business, financial condition, or results of operations.
10



Since September 2013, the NEDOI has chaired Aflac’s Supervisory College which was established consistent with international regulatory standards and supervisory best practices as a forum for cooperation and communication between the Company's primary supervisors. Japan's Financial Services Agency attends Aflac’s Supervisory College. Three Supervisory Colleges have taken place since its establishment and the regulators have agreed to continue this process.




Under state insurance guaranty association laws and similar laws in international jurisdictions, we arethe Company is subject to assessments, based on the share of business we writethe Company writes in the relevant jurisdiction, for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants. In the United States, some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. The Company's policy is to accrue assessments when the entity for which the insolvency relates has met its state of domicile's statutory definition of insolvency, the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable and the related premium upon which the assessment is based is written. In most states, the definition is met with a declaration of financial insolvency by a court of competent jurisdiction. For additional information regarding state insurance guaranty assessments, see the U.S. Regulatory Environment subsection of MD&A in this report.


Healthcare Reform Legislation

Federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas, including health care reform legislation, financial services reform legislation, securities regulation, pension regulation, privacy, tort reform legislation and taxation, can significantly and adversely affect insurance companies. For example, the ACA, federal health care reform legislation, gave the U.S. federal government direct regulatory authority over the business of health insurance. The reform included major changes to the U.S. health care insurance marketplace. Among other changes, the reform legislation included an individual medical insurance coverage mandate (which has since been repealed effective 2019 by the Tax Act, discussed below), provided for penalties on certain employers for failing to provide adequate coverage, created health insurance exchanges, and addressed coverage and exclusions as well as medical loss ratios. It also imposed an excise tax on certain high cost plans, known as the “Cadillac tax,” that is currently scheduled to begin in 2022. The legislation also included changes in government reimbursements and tax credits for individuals and employers and altered federal and state regulation of health insurers. The ACA, as enacted, does not require material changes in the design of the Company's insurance products. However, indirect consequences of the legislation and regulations could present challenges that could potentially have an impact on the Company's sales model, financial condition and results of operations. The United States Congress has considered and may continue to consider legislation that would repeal and replace key provisions of the ACA. There can be no assurance that any legislation affecting the ACA will be passed by Congress, nor as to the ultimate timing or provisions of any such legislation, nor as to the effect of any such legislation on the design or marketability of the Company's insurance products. Further, certain provisions of the ACA have been and may continue to be subject to challenge through litigation, the ultimate effects of which on the ACA are uncertain.

Tax Reform Legislation

A budget reconciliation act commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Job Act (Tax Act) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, effective January 1, 2018, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated or reduced certain deductions and credits, and limited the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation.

The Tax Act also transitions international corporate taxation from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system, which in light of the current tax treatment of Aflac Japan has the effect of subjecting the earnings of Aflac Japan to Japan taxation and subjecting the Company’s other earnings, including the consolidated earnings of the Parent Company, to U.S. taxation.

These changes were effective on January 1, 2018. Because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the period of enactment, during the period ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recorded, as the Company’s reasonable estimate, a net deferred tax liability reduction of $1.9 billion as of that date. As of the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional amount of deferred tax liabilities (DTLs) related to the Japan tax computation and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability. See Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this report. For information on the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary, see General Business under this Business section, above.


11





Dodd-Frank Act

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) and regulations issued thereunder, in particular rules to require central clearing for certain types of derivatives, may have an impact on Aflac's derivative activity, including activity on behalf of Aflac Japan. In addition, in 2015 and 2016, six U.S. financial regulators, including the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), issued final rules regarding the exchange of initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) for uncleared swaps that impose greater obligations on swap dealers regarding uncleared swaps with certain counterparties, such as Aflac. The requirements of such rules with respect to VM, as well as similar regulations in Europe, became effective on March 1, 2017. Full compliance with respect to all counterparties was required by September 1, 2017. The requirements of such rules with respect to IM are currently being phased in and will be fully implemented by September 1, 2020. In October of 2017, the CFTC and the European Commission each finalized comparability determinations that permit certain swap dealers who are subject to both regulatory margin regimes to take advantage of substituted compliance by complying with one set of margin requirements. The margin requirements are expected to result in more stringent collateral requirements and to affect other aspects of Aflac's derivatives activity.

The Dodd-Frank Act also established a Federal Insurance Office (FIO) under the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and of business lines other than certain health insurance, certain long-term care insurance and crop insurance. Traditionally, U.S. insurance companies have been regulated primarily by state insurance departments. The FIO does not directly regulate the insurance industry, but under Dodd-Frank it has the power to preempt state insurance regulations that are inconsistent with international agreements reached by the federal government, subject to certain requirements and restrictions. The FIO and certain federal agencies must achieve consensus positions with the state insurance regulators when taking positions on insurance proposals by certain international forums. In December 2013, the FIO released a report entitled "How To Modernize And Improve The System Of Insurance Regulation In The United States." The report was required by the Dodd-Frank Act, and included 18 recommended areas of near-term reform for the states, including addressing capital adequacy and safety/soundness issues, reform of insurer resolution practices, and reform of marketplace regulation. The report also listed nine recommended areas for direct federal involvement in insurance regulation. Some of the recommendations outlined in the FIO report released in December 2013 have been implemented. The National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers Reform Act, signed into law in January 2015, simplifies the agent and broker licensing process across state lines. The FIO has also engaged with the supervisory colleges to monitor financial stability and identify regulatory gaps for large national and internationally active insurers.

The current U.S. presidential administration and Congress have made recent attempts to reform or repeal certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, some of which have been implemented. For example, in 2018, President Trump signed into law the “Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.” Members of Congress have also introduced multiple bills that would impact or eliminate the FIO. The Federal Reserve is developing a rulemaking regarding the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s (the Council) ability to designate nonbank financial companies as Systemically Important Financial Institutions, and, pursuant to an Executive Order, the Treasury Department released a report on the Council’s designation authority. The Company cannot predict with any degree of certainty what impact, if any, such proposals will have on Aflac's business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Further Information

For further information concerning Aflac U.S. operations, regulation, change of control and dividend restrictions, see the Aflac U.S. Segment subsection of MD&A and Notes 2 and 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.


Privacy and Cybersecurity

The collection, maintenance, use, protection, disclosure and disposal of individually identifiable data by the Company's businesses are regulated at the international, federal and state levels. These laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation. Various state laws address the unauthorized access and acquisition of personal information and the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health data to the extent they are more restrictive than those contained in the privacy and security provisions in the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA) and in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). For example, in June 2018, California passed a data privacy law, scheduled to become effective January 2020, that requires businesses to provide California consumers rights to access, delete, and restrict certain uses of their personal information. HIPAA also requires that the Company imposes privacy and security requirements on its business associates (as such term is defined in the HIPAA regulations).With regard to personal information obtained from policyholders, the insured, or others, Aflac Japan is

12





regulated in Japan by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) and guidelines issued by FSA and other governmental authorities. The FSA updated its guidelines regarding cybersecurity in October 2018.

Cybersecurity also continues to be an area of evolving focus for U.S. legislation and regulatory activity. In March 2017, new cybersecurity regulation issued by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) went into effect that requires covered entities, including Aflac New York, to maintain an information security program meeting certain security, data disposal, audit, activity monitoring, and data encryption requirements. In October 2017, the NAIC adopted an Insurance Data Security Model Law that may be adopted in whole or in part by U.S. states in which the Company’s subsidiaries are licensed. Other states have adopted and, the Company expects, will continue to pass legislation and issue regulations related to cybersecurity. The Company anticipates, assesses, and if necessary modifies its information security program to accommodate such changes.

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted an information security policy directing management to establish and operate an information security program with the goal of ensuring that the Company’s information assets and data, and the data of its customers, are appropriately protected. The Board has delegated oversight of the Company’s information security program to the Audit and Risk Committee. The Company’s senior officers, including its Global Security and Chief Information Security Officer, are responsible for the operation of the information security program and regularly communicate with the Audit and Risk Committee on the program, including with respect to the state of the program, compliance with applicable regulations, current and evolving threats, and recommendations for changes in the information security program. The information security program also includes a cybersecurity incident response plan that is designed to provide a management framework across Company functions for a coordinated assessment and response to potential security incidents. This framework establishes a protocol to report certain incidents to the Global Security and Chief Information Security Officer and other senior officers, with the goal of timely assessing such incidents, determining applicable disclosure requirements and communicating with the Audit and Risk Committee. The incident response plan directs the executive officers to report certain incidents immediately and directly to the Lead Non-Management Director.

Other Operations
OurThe Company's other operations include the Parent Company, results of reinsurance retrocession activities, , and a printing subsidiary. For additional information on ourthe Company's other operations, see the Corporate and Other Operations subsection of MD&A and Note 8 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

10



Employees
As of December 31, 2015,2018, Aflac Japan had 4,7166,121 employees, Aflac U.S. had 4,8954,712 employees, and ourthe Company's other operations had 304557 employees.

13





Executive Officers of the Registrant
NAME
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(1)
AGE
Daniel P. AmosChairman, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 2001; Chief Executive Officer, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 19906467
Paul S. Amos IIPresident, Aflac, since 2007; Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Operations, Aflac, from 2006 until 201340

   
Koji AriyoshiExecutive Vice President, Director of Sales and Marketing, Aflac Japan, since 2012; First Senior Vice President, Director of Marketing and Sales, Aflac Japan, from 2010 until 201120126265

   
Max K. Broden
Kriss Cloninger IIISenior Vice President and Treasurer, Aflac Incorporated, since 2001; Chief Financial Officer, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac,2017; Senior Portfolio Manager, Norges Bank, from 19922007 until 2015; Treasurer, Aflac Incorporated, from 2001 until 2015; Executive Vice President, Aflac, since 1993
2017
6840

   
Frederick J. CrawfordExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Aflac Incorporated, since 2015; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, CNO Financial Group from 2012 until 2015; Executive Vice President, Head of Investment and Corporate Development, Lincoln Financial Group from 2010 until 2012; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Lincoln Financial Group from 2005 until 201020125255

   
J. Todd DanielsExecutive Vice President and Principal Financial Officer, Aflac Japan, since 2018; Executive Vice President, Global Chief Risk Officer and Chief Actuary, Aflac, from 2016 until 2018; Senior Vice President, Global Chief Risk Officer and Chief Actuary, Aflac, since 2015;from 2015 until 2016; Senior Vice President, Deputy Corporate Actuary and Global Chief Risk Officer, Aflac, since 2014;from 2014 until 2015; Senior Vice President, Deputy Corporate Actuary, Aflac, from 2012 until 2014; Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis, Aflac, from 2011 until 2012; Second Vice President, Aflac, Associate Actuary from 2008 until 2011
2012
4548

   
June HowardChief Accounting Officer, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 2010; Treasurer, Aflac, since 2011; Senior Vice President, Financial Services, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 2010; Vice President, Financial Services,Treasurer, Aflac, from 20092011 until 201020154952
Kenneth S. JankeExecutive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Development, Treasurer, Aflac Incorporated, since 2015; Executive Vice President, Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Aflac Incorporated, from 2010 until 2015; President, Aflac U.S., from 2013 until 2014; Senior Vice President, Investor Relations, Aflac Incorporated, from 1993 until 201057

   
Eric M. KirschExecutive Vice President, Global Chief Investment Officer, Aflac, since 2012; President, Aflac Asset Management LLC, since 2017; First Senior Vice President, Global Chief Investment Officer, Aflac, from 2011 until 2012; Managing Director, Global Head of Insurance Asset Management, Goldman Sachs Asset Management,201258
Masatoshi KoidePresident and Chief Operating Officer, Aflac Japan since 2017; Deputy President, Aflac Japan from 20072016 until 20112017; Executive Vice President, Aflac Japan from 2015 until 2016; First Senior Vice President, Aflac Japan from 2013 until 2015; Senior Vice President, Aflac Japan from 2012 until 20135558

   
Charles D. Lake, IIPresident, Aflac International, since 2014; Chairman, Aflac Japan, since 20085457

Albert A. RiggieriSenior Vice President, Global Chief Risk Officer and Chief Actuary, Aflac, since 2018; Senior Vice President, Corporate Actuary, Aflac, from 2016 until 2018; Group Chief Actuary, Unum Group, until 201663
   
Audrey B. TillmanExecutive Vice President, General Counsel, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 2014; Executive Vice President, Corporate Services, Aflac Incorporated, from 2008 until 20145154

   
Teresa L. WhitePresident, Aflac U.S., since 2014; Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Aflac, from 2013 until 2014; Executive Vice President, Chief Service Officer, Aflac, from 2012 until 2013; Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, Aflac, from 2008 until 20134952

   
Robin Y. WilkeyRichard L. Williams Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Distribution Officer, Aflac since 2017; Senior Vice President Investor and Rating Agency Relations, Aflac Incorporated, since 2010; Vice President, Investor Relations, Aflac Incorporated, from 2003 until 201057
Hiroshi YamauchiPresident, Chief Operating Officer, Aflac Japan, since 2015; Executive Vice President, Aflac Japan, from 2012 until 2014; FirstGeneral Manager, Stop Loss, Unum, U.S. in 2017; Senior Vice President, Aflac Japan,Growth Markets, Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company from 20022013 until 201120176447

(1)Unless specifically noted, the respective executive officer has held the occupation(s) set forth in the table for at least the last five years. Each executive officer is appointed annually by the board of directors and serves until his or her successor is chosen and qualified, or until his or her death, resignation or removal.


1114





ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We faceThe Company faces a wide range of risks, and ourits continued success depends on ourits ability to identify, prioritize and appropriately manage our enterprise risk exposures. Readers should carefully consider each of the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Form 10-K. These risks and other factors may affect forward-looking statements, including those in this document or made by the Company elsewhere, such as in earnings release webcasts, investor conference presentations or press releases. The risks and uncertainties described herein may not be the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to usthe Company or that wethe Company currently believebelieves to be immaterial may also adversely affect ourits business. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, there could be a material impact on the Company.
Difficult conditions in global capital markets and the economy could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's investments, capital position, revenue, profitability, and liquidity and harm ourthe Company's business.
OurThe Company's results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the global economy generally, including in ourits two primary operating markets of the United States and Japan. Weak global financial markets impact the value of ourthe Company's existing investment portfolio, influence opportunities for new investments, and may contribute to generally weak economic fundamentals, which can have a negative impact on ourits operating activities.


In recent years, global capital markets have been severely impacted by several major events. The financial crisis that began in the latter part of 2008 saw dramatic declines in investment values and weak economic conditions as the global financial system came under extreme pressure. Although U.S. markets began recovering in late 2009 and 2010, Europe continued to struggle under a severely weakened banking system and investor concerns with sovereign debt levels. Following a period of unprecedented intervention by governments and central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve and European Central Bank (ECB), financial conditions improved from the dire conditions of the global financial crisis, global recession, and European debt crisis. Recently,More recently, global markets have experienced materially higher levelsbouts of market volatility due to concerns including changes inuncertainty surrounding a British exit from the market’s perception of global growth, additional ECB intervention, uncertainty surroundingEuropean Union, Japan’s continued recovery amidst assorted policy changes, significant declinesvolatility in global commodity prices including oil, divergent monetary policies in the United States versus many other developed economies, and heightened concerns surrounding the Chinese economy.economy and increasing protectionism in U.S. foreign trade policy. While capital and market conditions have been generally favorable in the last year, volatility increased in the fourth quarter and the prospect for increased volatility remains.


A recent shift in the global trading policies by the U.S. and subsequent trade conflict with China has raised concerns about a slowdown of the Chinese economy. In addition, the U.S. and Japan are engaged in discussions regarding changes to tariffs and trade agreements. While it is not expected that the Company's products would be directly impacted by tariff, any resulting economic downturn could adversely affect the Company.

Activity by the government of North Korea in 2018 was the subject of increasing focus for a number of other governments, including those of the United States and Japan. Although hostile rhetoric has decreased, such North Korean activity and related geopolitical risk could have a significant impact on financial market conditions across the world. Under certain circumstances, government actions taken in response to the North Korean situation could have a material impact on the Company's Japan and U.S. operations and financial performance, including the indirect impact of potentially severe and prolonged capital market volatility and disruption.

As we holdthe Company holds a significant amount of fixed maturity and perpetual securities issued by borrowers located in many different parts of the world, including a large portion issued by banks and financial institutions, sovereigns, and other corporate borrowers in the U.S.United States and Europe, ourits financial results are directly influenced by global financial markets. A retrenchment of the recent improvements in overallstrength of the capital market healthmarkets could adversely affect ourthe Company's financial condition, including ourits capital position and our overall profitability. Market volatility and recessionary pressures could result in significant realized or unrealized losses due to severe price declines driven by increases in interest rates or credit spreads, defaults in payment of principal or interest, or credit rating downgrades.


Following the election of Shinzo Abe as Prime Minister of Japan in December 2012, the new administration adopted a new set of financial measures to stimulate the Japanese economy, most recentlyincluding imposing negative interest rates on excess bank reserves. In a December 2014 snap-election,and October 2017 snap-elections, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) won a landslide victory,decisive victories further strengthening Mr. Abe's ability to implementcontinue with economic reformreforms and address key policy challenges. The Japanese financial markets have reacted with even lower rates on Japanese Government bonds, large increases in Japanese equity market values, and a weakeningIn September 2018, Mr. Abe won reelection to another three-year term as president of the yen relativeLDP. Most recently, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) signaled to hold its policy rate at zero and to continue yield curve control to maintain a targeted

15



yield on the U.S. dollar, a situation10-year Japan Government Bond (JGB). Prime Minister Abe’s election victories may result in the continuation of current monetary policy, but there can be no guarantee that remains largely intact today.this is the case.


Japan is the largest market for ourthe Company's products, and we ownthe Company owns substantial holdings in Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs).JGBs. Government actions to stimulate the economy affect the value of ourthe Company's existing holdings, ourits reinvestment rate on new investments in JGBs or other yen denominatedyen-denominated assets, and consumer behavior relative to ourthe Company's suite of products. The additional government debt from fiscal stimulus actions could contribute to a weakening ofadversely impact the Japan sovereign credit profile, and resultwhich could in further rating downgrades at the credit rating agencies. This couldturn lead to additional volatility in Japanese capital and currency markets.


OurThe Company's investment portfolio ownshas sizeable credit positions in many other geographic areas of the world including the Middle East, Latin America, Asia, and other emerging markets. Deterioration in their underlying economies, sovereign credit worthiness, or financial market conditions could negatively impact ourthe Company's financial position. We also own credit

While the Company has continued to add floating rate investments that result in exposure to commodity valuations, including oil, natural gas, gold, and other metals. The recent

12



significant declines in the pricesits investment portfolio, most of these commodities could result in credit deterioration of our holdings and significant credit losses due to depressed bond valuations, defaults in payment of principal or interest, or credit rating downgrades.

Most of ourits investment portfolio holdings are income-producing bonds that provide a fixed level of income. Many of ourthe Company's investments were made at the relatively low level of interest rates prevailing over the last several years.decade. Any increase in the market yields of ourthe Company's holdings due to an increase in interest rates could create substantial unrealized losses in ourthe Company's portfolio, as discussed further in a separate risk factor in this section of the Form 10-K.


We needThe Company needs liquidity to pay ourits operating expenses, dividends on ourits common stock, interest on ourits debt, and liabilities. For a further description of ourthe Company's liquidity needs, including maturing indebtedness, see Item 7 of this Form 10-K - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -the Capital Resources and Liquidity.Liquidity section of MD&A in this report. In the event ourthe Company's current resources do not meet ourits needs, wethe Company may need to seek additional financing. OurThe Company's access to additional funding will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit to the financial services industry and ourits credit rating. We have a credit facility agreement as a capital contingency plan with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for borrowings in the amount of 55 billion yen. This agreement provides for borrowings in Japanese yen or the equivalent of Japanese yen in U.S. dollars on a revolving basis and will expire on the earlier of September 18, 2020, or the date the commitments are terminated pursuant to an event of default, as such term is defined in the credit agreement.

As a part of our capital contingency plan, we entered into a committed reinsurance facility agreement on December 1, 2015 in the amount of approximately 110 billion yen. This reinsurance facility agreement is effective from December 1, 2015 until December 31, 2016. There are also additional commitment periods of a one-year duration each which are automatically extended unless notification is received from the reinsurer within 60 days prior to the expiration. The reinsurer can withdraw from the committed facility if Aflac‘s Standard and Poor's (S&P) rating drops below BBB-. As of December 31, 2015, we have not executed a reinsurance treaty under this committed reinsurance facility.


Should investors become concerned with any of ourthe Company's investment holdings, including the concentration in JGBs, ourits access to market sources of funding could be negatively impacted. There is a possibility that lenders or debt investors may also become concerned if we incurthe Company incurs large investment losses or if the level of ourthe Company's business activity decreases due to a market downturn or there are further adverse economic trends in the United States or Japan, specifically, or generally in developed markets. Similarly, ourthe Company's access to funds may be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us.actions. See more information on recent rating actions later in this Risk Factors section.


Broad economic factors such as consumer spending, business investment, government spending, the volatility and strength of the capital markets, and inflation all affect the business and economic environment and, indirectly, the amount and profitability of ourthe Company's business. In an economic downturn characterized by higher unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, lower business investment and lower consumer spending, the demand for financial and insurance products could be adversely affected. This adverse effect could be particularly significant for companies such as oursAflac that distribute supplemental, discretionary insurance products primarily through the worksite in the event that economic conditions result in a decrease in the number of new hires and total employees. Adverse changes in the economy could potentially lead ourthe Company's customers to be less inclined to purchase supplemental insurance coverage or to decide to cancel or modify existing insurance coverage, which could adversely affect ourthe Company's premium revenue, results of operations and financial condition. We areThe Company is unable to predict the course of the current recoveries in global financial markets or the recurrence, duration or severity of disruptions in such markets.


The effect that governmental actions for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets will have on such markets generally, or on us specifically,Company is difficult to determine at this time.
In response to the severity of the global financial crisis, numerous regulatory and governmental actions were taken to address weakness in the banking system, volatility in capital market conditions, and to stimulate the global economy. In the United States, this included aggressive expansionary monetary policy actions by the Federal Reserve, including conventional measures such as reducing the Federal Funds rate to near zero, and less conventional measures such as multiple rounds of quantitative easing. The result of the actions of the Federal Reserve was to keep interest rates, as measured by the U.S. Treasury curve and other relevant market rates, at very low levels for an extended period of time in an attempt to stimulate the economy.

As the U.S. economy has continued to improve, the Federal Reserve has reduced the amount of monetary stimulus. The actions previously taken by the Federal Reserve, and the amounts involved, are unprecedented. As such, there exist considerable risks associated with the amount of monetary stimulus provided and its withdrawal. These risks could

13



include heightened inflation, increased volatility of interest rates, significantly higher interest rates, and overall increased volatility in the fair value of investment securities. These factors could negatively impact our business by reducing the value of our existing portfolio, negatively impacting our opportunities for new investments as market volatility increases, increasing the risk of depressed bond valuations or defaults in our credit portfolio, increasing the costs to hedge certain dollar holdings into yen, and reducing the demand for our products should the broader economy be negatively impacted by withdrawal of monetary stimulus.

The financial crisis also created new government regulation, including the Dodd-Frank Financial Regulatory Reform Bill for U.S. institutions. This significant legislation, intended to reduce risk of another crisis, contains multiple provisions that could impact our business as rules are finalized and implemented. This legislation could impact the value of our significant holdings in banks and other financial institutions and our ability to conduct financial and capital market transactions, negatively impact pricing and our general ability to conduct financial and capital market transactions, and affect the general competitiveness of the U.S. financial services industry.

As the effects of the financial crisis continue to linger, other central banks around the world have followed the actions of the Federal Reserve and taken unprecedented actions. In the case of the ECB, multiple actions were taken to mitigate the European sovereign and banking crisis, and to stimulate the economies throughout the Eurozone. The Bank of Japan has undertaken monetary policy actions designed to stimulate the Japanese economy. These governmental interventions are still being deployed in the form of extremely low short-term interest rates and asset purchases, and thus may continue to support an environment of historically low or negative interest rates in the near to medium term. There can be no assurance as to the effect that these governmental actions, other governmental actions taken in the future, or the ceasing of these governmental actions will have on the financial markets generally, the economies in which we operate, our competitive position, or our business and financial condition.

Defaults, downgrades, widening credit spreads or other events impairing the value of the fixed maturity securities and perpetual securities in our investment portfolio may reduce our earnings and capital position.
We are subject to the risk that the issuers and/or guarantors of fixed maturity securities and perpetual securities we own may default on principal or interest. A significant portion of our portfolio represents an unsecured obligation of the issuer, including some that are subordinated to other debt in the issuer’s capital structure. In these cases, many factors can influence the overall creditworthiness of the issuer and ultimately its ability to service and repay our holdings. This can include changes in the global economy, the company's assets, strategy, or management, shifts in the dynamics of the industries in which they compete, their access to additional funding, and the overall health of the credit markets. Factors unique to our securities including contractual protections such as financial covenants or relative position in the issuer's capital structure also influence the value of our holdings.

Most of our holdings carry a rating by one or more of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs, or “rating agencies”). Any change in the rating agencies' approach to evaluating credit and assigning an opinion could negatively impact the fair value of our portfolio. We employ a team of credit analysts to monitor the creditworthiness of the issuers in our portfolio. Any credit-related declines in the fair value of positions held in our portfolio we believe are not temporary in nature will negatively impact our net income and capital position through impairment and other credit related losses, which would also affect our solvency ratios in the United States and Japan. For regulatory accounting purposes for Aflac Japan, there are certain requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by credit-related losses, which may be different from U.S. GAAP and statutory requirements, which could negatively impact Aflac Japan's earnings, and the corresponding repatriation and capital deployment.

We are also subject to the risk that any collateral providing credit enhancement to our positions could deteriorate. These instruments may include senior secured first lien loans, such as bank loans and middle market loans, and loan-backed securities where the underlying loan or collateral notes may default on principal, interest, or other payments, causing an adverse change in cash flows to the positions held in our investment portfolio.

Our portfolio includes holdings of perpetual securities. Most of these are issued by global banks and financial institutions. Following the financial crisis, rating agencies reviewed and, in most cases, modified the rating criteria for financial institutions. This has caused multiple downgrades of many bank and financial issuers, but perpetual securities have been more negatively impacted as their lower position in the capital structure represents relatively more risk than other more senior obligations of the issuer. Further downgrades or default of issuers of securities we own will have a negative impact on our portfolio and could reduce our earnings and capital.


14



We are exposed to sovereign credit risk through instruments issued directly by governments and government entities as well as banks and other institutions that rely in part on the strength of the underlying government for their credit quality. In addition to the United States and Japan, many governments, especially in Europe, have been subject to rating downgrades due to the need for fiscal and budgetary remediation and structural reforms, reduced economic activity, and investment needed to support banks or other systematically important entities. Additional downgrades or default of our sovereign issuers will have a negative impact on our portfolio and could reduce our earnings and capital.

In addition to our exposure to the underlying fundamental credit strength of the issuers of our fixed maturity and perpetual securities and the underlying risk of default, we are also exposed to the general movement in credit market spreads. A widening of credit spreads could reduce the value of our existing portfolio, create unrealized losses on our investment portfolio, and reduce our adjusted capital position which is used in determining the Solvency Margin Ratio (SMR) in Japan. This could, however, increase the net investment income on new credit investments. Conversely, a tightening of credit spreads could increase the value of our existing portfolio and create unrealized gains on our investment portfolio. This could reduce the net investment income available to us on new credit investments. Increased market volatility also makes it difficult to value certain of our investment holdings (see the Critical Accounting Estimates section in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, of this Form 10-K).

As a result of the large decline in oil prices, there has been heightened attention to certain investments in the various energy sectors following a large increase in market volatility. Our portfolio includes holdings diversified across multiple sub-sectors of the oil and gas industry, spread among multiple geographies.

As of December 31, 2015, the weighted-average rating of our total fixed maturity energy exposure was BBB, and 93% of our exposure to the oil and gas industry was investment grade. Absent a major change in the outlook for oil prices, we expect the increase in market volatility surrounding these issuers to continue. This could lead to increased negative ratings activity from the public rating agencies for energy credit issuers. We do not currently expect our investments in the energy sector to have a material impact on our results of operations.

For more information regarding credit risk, see the Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Credit Risk subsection of Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, of this Form 10-K.

We are exposed to significant interest rate risk, which may adversely affect ourits results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
We haveThe Company has substantial investment portfolios that support ourits policy liabilities. Low levels of interest rates on investments especially those currently being experienced in Japan and the United States over the last decade have reduced the level of investment income earned by the Company. OurThe Company's overall level of investment income will be negatively impacted ifin a persistent low-interest-rate environment persists.environment. While wethe Company generally seekseeks to maintain a diversified portfolio of fixed-income investments that reflects the cash flow and duration characteristics of the liabilities it supports, wethe Company may not be able to fully mitigate the interest rate risk of ourits assets relative to ourits liabilities. OurThe Company's exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to the ability to invest future cash flows to support the interest rate assumption made at the time ourthe Company's products were priced and the related reserving assumptions were established. A sustained decline in interest rates could hinder ourthe Company's ability to earn the returns assumed in the pricing and the reserving for ourits products at the time they were sold and issued. Due to low interest rates, ourthe Company's ability to earn the returns we expectit expects may also influence ourthe Company's ability to develop and price attractive new products and could impact ourits overall

16



sales levels. OurThe Company's first sector products are more interest rate sensitive than third sector products. As discussed in Item 1. Business, beginning in 2013, Aflac Japan began to curtail sales of first sector savings-type products due to persistent low interest rates in Japan. The recentcontinuing negative interest rate imposed by the Bank of JapanBoJ on excess bank reserves could continue to have a negative impact on the distribution and pricing of these products.
A rise in interest rates could improve ourthe Company's ability to earn higher rates of return on funds that we reinvest.future investments, as well as floating rate investments held in its investment portfolio. However, an increase in the differential of short-term U.S. and Japan interest rates would increase the cost of hedging oura portion of the U.S. dollar-denominated assets in the Aflac Japan segment into yen.yen, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. The Company’s floating rate investments typically bear interest based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Regulatory and industry initiatives to eliminate LIBOR as an interest rate benchmark may create uncertainty in the valuation of LIBOR-based loans, as well as for other LIBOR-based derivatives and assets. This may adversely impact both pricing and liquidity in such instruments. The Company is unable to predict with certainty how LIBOR elimination may impact markets, pricing, liquidity and other factors or the Company's activities.
We also have exposure to interest rates related to the value of the substantial investment portfolios that support our policy liabilities. Changes in interest rates have a direct impact on the fair valuesunrealized gains and losses of fixed income securities in ourthe Company's investment portfolio; however, they do not have a direct impact on the related valuation of the corresponding liabilities. Prolonged periods of low interest rates, as have been experienced in recent years, heighten the risk of future increases in interest rates because of an increasing proportion of ourthe Company's investment portfolio includes investments that bear lower rates of return than the embedded book yield of the investment portfolio. A rise in interest rates could increasedecrease the net unrealized loss positionfair value of ourthe Company's debt and perpetual securities. Some of the insurance products that Aflac sells in the United States and Japan provide cash surrender values. A rise in interest rates could trigger significant policy lapsationsurrenders, which might require

15



the Company to sell investment assets and recognize unrealized losses. This situation is commonly referred to as disintermediation risk. Conversely, a decline in interest rates could decrease the net unrealized loss position of our debt and perpetual securities. While weThe Company generally invest ourinvests its assets to match the duration and cash flow characteristics of ourits policy liabilities, and therefore would not expect to realize most of these gains or losses, ourhowever, the Company's risk is that unforeseen events or economic conditions, such as changes in interest rates resulting from governmental monetary policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and other factors beyond ourthe Company's control will reduce the effectiveness of this strategy andstrategy. These events or economic conditions could either cause usthe Company to dispose of some or all of these investments prior to their maturity, or increase the risk that the issuers of these securities may default or may require impairment, which could result in ourthe Company having to recognize such gains or losses.
Rising interest rates also negatively impact the SMR since unrealized losses on the available-for-sale investment portfolio are included infactor into the calculation. While we closely monitor the SMR and have taken steps to reduce the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's available-for-sale portfolio to increases in interest rates, there is no assurance that these measures will be fully effective, particularly for sharp increases in interest rates.ratio. For regulatory accounting purposes for Aflac Japan, there are certain requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by rising interest rates, negatively impacting Aflac Japan's earnings and corresponding repatriationdividends and capital deployment.
We mitigate our exposure to interest rate risk by diversifying our portfolio to risk factors that may be expected to have negative correlation to interest rates, particularly in periods of heightened market volatility. These include equity, credit, and currency risk factors. However,Further, interest rate risk is still an inherent portfolio, business and capital risk for us,the Company, and significant changes in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows through realized losses, impairments, changes in unrealized positions, and liquidity.


For more information regarding interest rate risk, see the Interest Rate Risk subsection within the Market Risks of Financial Instruments section of MD&A in this report.


OurThe Company's concentration of business in Japan poses risks to ourits operations.
OurThe Company's operations in Japan, including realized gains and losses on Aflac Japan's investment portfolio, accounted for 70% of ourthe Company's total revenues for 2015,both 2018 and 2017, compared with 72%71% in 2014 and 74% in 2013.2016. The Japanese operations accounted for 83%84% of ourthe Company's total assets at December 31, 2015,2018, compared with 82%83% at December 31, 2014.2017.


Further, because of the concentration of ourthe Company's business in Japan and ourits need for long-dated yen-denominated assets, we havethe Company has a substantial concentration of JGBs in ourits investment portfolio. As such we havethe Company has material exposure to the Japanese economy, geo-political climate, political regime, and other factors that generally determine a country's creditworthiness. Specifically, the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs, or "rating agencies"), credit rating agencies registered with the SEC, have placed increased scrutiny on JGBs, which are a significant component of the Company’s overall investment portfolio, resulting in downgrades as discussed later in this Risk Factors section. 

The NAIC is also considering changes to investment risk factors. Any negative developments by the NRSROs or NAIC in these areas could result in increased capital requirements for the Company.

We seekCompany seeks to match the investment currency and interest rate risk to ourits yen liabilities. The low level of interest rates available on yen-denominated securities has a negative effect on our overall net investment income. A large portion of

17



the cash available for reinvestment each year is deployed in yen-denominated instruments and subject to the low level of yen interest rates.


Any potential deterioration in Japan's credit quality, market access, the overall economy of Japan, or Japanese market volatility could adversely impact the business of Aflac in general and specifically Aflac Japan and ourits related results of operations and financial condition.


The Companyis exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate.

Due to the size of Aflac Japan, where functional currency is the Japanese yen, fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the yen and the U.S. dollar can have a significant effect on the Company's reported financial position and results of operations. Aflac Japan's premiums and approximately half of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on the Company's reported financial position and results of operations. In periods when yen weakens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes fewer U.S. dollars to be reported. When yen strengthens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes more U.S. dollars to be reported. Any unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result, yen weakening has the effect of suppressing current year results in relation to the prior year, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying current year results in relation to the prior year. In addition, the weakening of the yen relative to the U.S. dollar will generally adversely affect the value of the Company's yen-denominated investments in U.S. dollar terms.

The Company engages in certain foreign currency hedging activities for the purpose of hedging the yen exposure to its net investment in operations in Japan. These hedging activities are limited in scope, and the Company cannot provide assurance that these activities will be effective.

Unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities held by Aflac Japan are exposed to foreign exchange fluctuations, which impact SMR. In periods of yen strengthening, the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments will experience unrealized foreign exchange losses, negatively impacting SMR. This impact increases when the size of the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolio increases, which can occur due to the purchase of additional unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments, or through termination or expiration of existing hedges. Unrealized currency gains and losses on unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities are monetized (or, in other words, are economically realized) only upon converting the proceeds from the sale, maturity or redemption of these securities to yen, which primarily occurs when yen are needed to satisfy policyholder obligations or other business expenses of Aflac Japan. To mitigate exposure to the foreign exchange risk from U.S. dollar-denominated investments and to reduce SMR volatility, the Company engages in certain currency hedging activities. However, these hedging activities are limited in scope and the Company cannot provide assurance that its hedging strategies will be effective. As a result, periods of unusually volatile currency exchange rates could result in limitations on dividends available to the Parent Company.

As indicated in the Item 1, Business, the Company has determined that the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio acts as a natural economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company’s investment in Aflac Japan against erosion of economic value. However, the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio at the same time creates an unmatched foreign currency exposure and subjects Aflac Japan to volatility in regulatory capital and earnings, which may adversely impact Aflac Japan’s ability to pay dividends to the Parent Company. The overall investment strategy in Aflac Japan is guided primarily by the objective of securing the long-term financial strength of Aflac Japan and funding of yen liabilities. As a result, the Company has historically maintained and currently maintains the size of the unhedged portfolio at levels below the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan. However, there can be no assurance that this strategy will be successful.

Furthermore, for regulatory accounting purposes, there are certain requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by changes in the rate of exchange between the yen and U.S. dollar and could negatively impact Aflac Japan's earnings and the corresponding dividends and capital deployment.

Additionally, the Company is exposed to currency risk when yen cash flows are converted into U.S. dollars, resulting in an increase or decrease in the Company's U.S. dollar-denominated cash flows and earnings when exchange gains or losses, respectively, are realized. This primarily occurs when the Company dividends funds from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company, but it also has an impact when cash in the form of yen is converted to U.S. dollars for investment into U.S. dollar-denominated assets. The exchange rates prevailing at the time of dividend payment may differ from the exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. In 2018, the Parent Company entered into forward contracts to

18



accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency exchange rate risk related to dividend payments by Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. If the markets experience a significant strengthening of yen, this could cause cash strain at the Parent Company as a result of cash collateral and potentially cash settlement requirements. Based on the timing and severity of exchange rate fluctuations combined with the level of outstanding activity in this program, the cash strain at the Parent Company could be significant. 

For more information regarding unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, see the risk factor below entitled, “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity”. For more information regarding foreign currency risk, see the Currency Risk subsection within the Market Risks of Financial Instruments section of MD&A.

Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect ourthe Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
We attemptThe Company attempts to match both the duration and currency of ourits assets with ourits liabilities. This is very difficult for Aflac Japan due to the lack of available long-dated yen-denominated fixed income instruments.instruments beyond JGBs.


Prior to the onset of the financial crisis of 2008, the Company was focused on investing cash flows in JGBs, which had relatively low yields, and utilizing private placement and perpetual securities to gain additional yield, extend the duration of the investment portfolio, and maintain yen exposure. Given call activity with respect to certain of the Company's legacy private placement investments, the Company has added a modest amount of yen-denominated private placements to its investment portfolio in recent periods. The investment in private placements and perpetual securities has led to increased riskscarries risk associated with illiquidity.

16illiquidity, which is managed and monitored by the Company.





Starting in 2012, Aflac Japan augmented its investment strategy to include U.S. dollar-denominated securitiesinvestments, some of which could then be hedged back to yen. Initially this program focused on public investment-grade bonds but has evolved over time to include U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade commercial mortgage loans, infrastructure debt, as well as other loan types, high yield corporate bonds bank loans and middle market loans. As of December 31, 2015, Aflac Japan held approximately $22.7 billion in U.S. dollar-denominated income producing securities, at amortized cost, and approximately $14.3 billion of notional in foreign currency forwards and options to hedge principal currency risk. We planequity securities. The Company plans to continue adding other instruments denominated in U.S. dollars, including floating rate investments, to improve the portfolio diversification and/or return profile. Some of the U.S. dollar-denominated asset classes that we anticipate addingthe Company has added, and anticipates continuing to add, have less liquidity than investment-grade corporate bonds. These strategies will continue to increase ourthe Company's exposure to U.S. interest rates, credit spreads and other risks. We haveThe Company has increased foreign exchange risk exposure as the comprehensive hedging program may not always correlate to the underlying U.S. dollar-denominated assets, thereby increasing earnings volatility. These risks can significantly impact the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity.


Investing in U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan also creates an unmatched foreign currency exposure and related SMR volatility, as Aflac Japan’s insurance liabilities are yen-denominated. Although the Company engages in certain foreign exchange hedging activities to partially mitigate this risk, and such hedged assets may be used to satisfy yen-denominated insurance liabilities and other business obligations, important risks remain.

Foreign exchange derivatives used for hedging are periodically settled, which results in cash receipt or payment at maturity or early termination. The Company’s foreign exchange derivatives are typically shorter-dated than the underlying U.S. dollar-denominated investments being hedged, which creates roll-over risks within the hedging program that could increase the cost of such derivatives. If the Company reduces the notional amount of foreign exchange derivatives prior to the maturity of the hedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments, the foreign exchange gains or losses on the U.S. dollar-denominated investments remain economically unrealized. These gains or losses are only economically realized, or monetized, through sale, maturity or redemption of the investments and concurrent conversion to yen. However, the Company may not realize the benefit of offsetting adverse cash settlements on hedging derivatives with cash receipts on the U.S. dollar-denominated investments if the currency exchange rates move in an adverse direction before the investments are converted to yen, or if the investments are never converted to yen. As an example of the latter, if the Company’s actual insurance risk experience in Japan is as expected or more favorable than expected, the need for yen to pay expenses and claims would correspondingly remain at or below expected levels, thereby diminishing operational requirements to convert U.S. dollar-denominated investments to yen. Since 2012, the cumulative net cash settlements on derivatives hedging currency exposure of Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments were an outflow of $3.9 billion as of December 31, 2018. These outflows or cumulative net negative settlements are associated with foreign exchange derivatives on existing U.S. dollar-denominated investments and hedged investments that have since been sold, matured or redeemed and may or may have not been converted to yen. Furthermore, the settlements include instances where the initial foreign exchange derivative notional amounts were reduced prior to the maturity of the hedged

19



investments. The settlement of the foreign exchange derivatives is reported in the investing activities section of the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows in the line item “Settlement of derivatives, net.”

For more information regarding unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, see the risk factor above entitled, “The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate.” For more information regarding Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investments and hedging activities, see the Hedging Activities subsection within the Item 7. MD&A section in this report, and for more information regarding foreign currency risk, see the Currency Risk subsection within the Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk section in this report.

U.S. tax audit risk related to conversion of the Japan branch to a subsidiary could adversely impact the Company's financial position.

The conversion of the Japan branch to a legal subsidiary, which the Company executed in the second quarter of 2018, was a complex, tax-free transaction that is conditioned on the continued validity of a private letter ruling the Company received from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Notwithstanding the receipt of the private letter ruling, the IRS could determine that the Japan branch conversion should be treated as a taxable transaction. For example, the IRS could conclude that the representations, assumptions and covenants on which the private letter ruling is based are untrue, not accurate, or have not been fulfilled. If the IRS made such a conclusion, the Company could incur significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities or litigation costs to defend the tax-free treatment of the transaction outlined by the private letter ruling. Such liabilities or costs could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

If wefuture policy benefits, claims or expenses exceed those anticipated in establishing premiums and reserves, the Company's financial results would be adversely affected.

The Company establishes premiums for many of its policies on assumptions for morbidity, mortality, longevity and persistency. The Company also establishes and carries, as a liability, reserves based on estimates of how much will be required to pay for future benefits and claims on its policies. The Company calculates these reserves using various assumptions and estimates, including premiums the Company will receive over the assumed life of the policy; the timing, frequency and severity of the events covered by the insurance policy; and the investment returns on the assets the Company purchases with a portion of its net cash flow from operations.

The assumptions and estimates that the Company uses in establishing premiums and reserves depend on the Company's judgment regarding the likelihood of future events and are inherently uncertain. Many factors can cause actual outcomes to deviate from these assumptions and estimates, such as changes in economic conditions, changes in government healthcare policy, advances in medical technology, changes in treatment patterns, and changes in average lifespan. Accordingly, the Company cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts that it will pay for, or the timing of payment of, actual benefits and claims or whether the assets supporting the policy liabilities will grow to the level the Company assumes prior to payment of benefits or claims. If the Company's actual experience is different from its assumptions or estimates, the Company's reserves may prove inadequate. As a result, the Company would incur a charge to earnings in the period in which it determines such a shortfall exists, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

Generally, lower mortality decreases the profitability of third sector products in Japan, as more policyholders will survive into ages where they have a higher rate of claim incidence. This assumption can impact pricing and reserving.  For instance, Japan FSA periodically requires updates to their Standard mortality tables for FSA reserves. An update to the Standard mortality tables was performed in April 2018 applicable to all business issued after that date. For business that is inforce prior to the update, the change in mortality table would not have an impact. For new issues, the updated mortality tables would be included in our reserve assumptions, and slow the emergence of FSA earnings for third sector products and therefore will have an impact on pricing returns. The Company adjusts pricing assumptions as new products are developed to adjust for these mortality assumptions. 

The success of the Company's business depends in part on effective information technology systems and on continuing to develop and implement improvements in technology.

The Company's business depends in large part on its technology systems for interacting with employers, policyholders, sales associates, and brokers, and the Company's business strategy involves providing customers with easy-to-use products to meet their needs and ensuring employees have the technology in place to support those needs. Some of the Company's information technology systems and software are older, legacy-type systems that are less efficient and require an ongoing commitment of significant resources to maintain or upgrade to current standards including

20



adequate business continuity procedures. The Company is in a continual state of upgrading and enhancing its business systems; however, these changes tend to challenge the Company's complex integrated environment. The Company's success is dependent in large part on maintaining or improving the effectiveness of existing systems and continuing to develop and enhance information systems that support its business processes in a cost-efficient manner. If the Company does not maintain the effectiveness of its systems, the Company's operations and reputation could be adversely affected and it could be exposed to litigation as well as to regulatory proceedings and fines or penalties.

Competition could adversely affect the Company's ability to increase or maintain its market share or profitability.

The Company operates in a competitive environment and in an industry that is subject to ongoing changes from market pressures brought about by customer demands, legislative reform, marketing practices and changes to health care and health insurance delivery. These factors require the Company to anticipate market trends and make changes to differentiate the Company's products and services from those of its competitors. The Company also faces the potential of competition from existing or new companies in the United States and Japan that have not historically been active in the supplemental health insurance industry, but some of which have greater financial, marketing and management resources than the Company does. Failure to anticipate market trends and/or to differentiate the Company's products and services can affect the Company's ability to retain or grow profitable lines of business.

Further, as employers and brokers are increasingly requesting a full-suite of products from one insurance provider, a failure to react and adapt to these demands could result in decreased sales or market share. Similarly, a failure to meet evolving customer demands through innovative product development, effective distribution channels, and continuous investment in the Company's technology could result in lower revenues and less favorable policy terms and conditions, which could adversely affect the Company's operating results.

Events, including those external to the Company's operations, could damage the Company's reputation.

The Company has made significant investments in the Aflac brand over a long period of time. Because insurance products are intangible, the Company's ability to compete for and maintain policyholders relies to a large extent on consumer trust in the Company's business. The perception of unfavorable business practices or financial weakness could create doubt regarding the Company's ability to honor the commitments it has made to its policyholders. Maintaining the Company's stature as a trustworthy insurer and responsible corporate citizen, which helps support the strength of the Company's brand, is critical to the Company's reputation and the failure or perceived failure to do so could adversely affect the Company's brand value, financial condition and results of operations. For example, negative publicity or allegations of unfavorable business practices or poor governance can be rapidly and widely shared over social or traditional media or other means, and could reduce demand for the Company's insurance products, reduce the Company's ability to recruit and retain employees, or lead to greater regulatory scrutiny of the Company's operations.

Sales of the Company's products and services are dependent on its ability to attract, retain and support a network of qualified sales associates, brokers and employees in the United States and sales associates and other distribution partners in Japan.

The Company's sales could be adversely affected if its sales networks deteriorate or if the Company does not adequately provide support, training and education for its existing network. In the United States, competition exists for sales associates and brokers with demonstrated ability. In Japan, the Company's sales results are dependent upon its relationship with sales associates and other distribution partners, including its alliance partner, Japan Post, which in recent periods has accounted for approximately 25% of Aflac Japan's third sector sales. The Company competes with other insurers and financial institutions primarily on the basis of its products, compensation, support services and financial rating. The Company's inability to attract and retain qualified sales associates, brokers and other distribution partners, including its alliance partners in Japan, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's sales, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company's sales associates and brokers are independent contractors and may sell products of its competitors. If the Company's competitors offer products that are more attractive, or pay higher commissions than the Company does, any or all of these distribution partners may concentrate their efforts on selling the Company's competitors' products instead of the Company's. In addition to the Company's commissioned sales force in the United States, Aflac has expanded its sales leadership team to include a salaried sales force of over 200 market directors and broker sales professionals. The Company's ability to attract and retain top talent in these salaried roles has a material impact on its sales success.


21



Additionally, as the Japan and U.S. employment markets continue to evolve, there is risk that the Company's practices regarding attracting, developing, and retaining employees may not be fully effective. Failure to successfully meet and maintain sufficient levels of employees may diminish the Company's ability to achieve its financial and compliance objectives, both of which are time consuming and personnel-intensive.

Interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality, integrity or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, could harm the Company's business.

The Company stores confidential policyholder, employee, agent, and other proprietary information on its information technology systems. In addition, the Company depends heavily on its telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems and on the integrity and timeliness of data it uses to run its businesses and service its customers. These systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events or circumstances wholly or partly beyond the Company's control. Additionally, design flaws may exist in certain systems, processes, software, or configurations that in turn may result in system failure, data corruption, or compromise. Despite the Company's implementation of a variety of security measures to defend against threats incurred on a daily basis, its information technology and other systems, as well as those of third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels, have been and will likely continue to be subject to physical or electronic break-ins, unauthorized tampering, security breaches or other cyber-attacks, that may result in the failure to adequately maintain the security, confidentiality, integrity, or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to customers and prospective customers, or in the misappropriation of the Company's intellectual property or proprietary information.

From time to time, the Company, its third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels have experienced and will likely continue to experience such events. Although the minor data leakage issues the Company has experienced to date have not had a material effect on its business, there is no assurance that the Company's security systems or processes will prevent or mitigate future break-ins, tampering, security breaches or other cyber-attacks. Interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, whether due to actions by the Company or others, including third party providers and participants in the company’s distribution channels, could delay or disrupt the Company's ability to do business and service its customers, seriously harm the Company's brand and reputation as well as the Company's ability to compete effectively, subject it to regulatory sanctions and other claims, lead to a loss of customers and revenues and otherwise adversely affect the Company's business. In addition, the costs to address or remediate system interruptions or security threats and vulnerabilities, whether before or after an incident, could be significant.

While the Company continues to invest in the infrastructure of its data security programs, the Company, as well as its third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels, have been, and will likely continue to be, the target of unauthorized access, social engineering, phishing, cyber-attacks, web application attacks, computer viruses or other malicious codes, or other computer-related penetrations. Although the Company attempts to manage its exposure to such events through the purchase of cyber liability insurance, such events are inherently unpredictable and insurance may not be sufficient to protect the Company against all losses. As a result, events such as these could adversely affect the Company's financial condition or results of operation.

If the Company fails to comply with restrictions on patientcustomer privacy and information security, including taking steps to ensure that ourits third-party service providers and business associates who obtain access, tostore, process or transmit sensitive patientcustomer information maintain its security, integrity, confidentiality ourand availability, the Company's reputation and business operations could be materially adversely affected.


The collection, maintenance, use, protection, disclosure and disposal of individually identifiable data by ourthe Company's businesses are regulated at the international, federal and state levels. These laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation. Various state laws address the unauthorized access and acquisition of personal information and the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health data to the extent they are more restrictive than those contained in the privacy and security provisions in the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA)GLBA and in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).HIPAA. HIPAA also requires that we imposethe Company imposes privacy and security requirements on ourits business associates (as such term is defined in the HIPAA regulations).With regard to personal information obtained from policyholders, the insured, or others, Aflac Japan is regulated in Japan by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI)APPI and guidelines issued by FSA and other governmental authorities.
Even though we
The Company relies on third parties, and in some cases subcontractors, to provide information technology and data services. It also relies on various parties in its distribution channels including agencies, banks and Japan Post in Japan, as well as sales associates and brokers in the United States, to provide services to prospective and existing customers.

22



Although the Company provides for appropriate protections through ourits contracts and performperforms information security risk assessments withof its third-party service providers and business associates, wethe Company still havehas limited control over their actions and practices. In addition, despite the security measures we havethe Company has in place to ensure compliance with applicable laws and rules, ourthe Company's facilities and systems, and those of ourthe Company's third-party providers and participants in its distribution channels may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism or theft, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors or other similar events. From time to time, the Company, its third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels have experienced and will likely continue to experience such events. In such cases, notification to affected individuals, state and federal regulators, state attorneys general and media may be required, depending upon the number of affected individuals and whether personal information including health or financial data was subject to unauthorized access.

The U.S. Congress and many states are considering new privacy and security requirements that would apply to ourthe Company's business. Compliance with new privacy and security laws, requirements, and new regulations may result in cost increases due to necessary systems changes, new limitations or constraints on ourthe Company's business models, the development of new administrative processes, and the effects of potential noncompliance by ourthe Company's business associates. They also may impose further restrictions on ourthe Company's collection, disclosure and use of patientcustomer identifiable data that are housed in one or more of ourthe Company's administrative databases. Noncompliance with any privacy laws or any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss, theft or other unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential membercustomer information, whether by usthe Company or by one of our vendors,its third parties, could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's business, reputation, brand and results of operations, including: material fines and penalties; compensatory, special, punitive and statutory damages; consent orders regarding ourthe Company's privacy and security practices; adverse actions against ourthe Company's licenses to do business; and injunctive relief.

In addition, under Japanese laws and regulations, including the APPI, if a leak or loss of personal information by Aflac Japan or its business associates should occur, depending on factors such as the volume of personal data involved and the likelihood of other secondary damage, Aflac Japan may be required to file reports to the FSA; issue public releases explaining such incident to the public; or become subject to an FSA business improvement order, which could pose a risk to ourthe Company's reputation.


WeExtensive regulation and changes in legislation can impact profitability and growth.

Aflac's insurance subsidiaries are exposedsubject to foreign currency fluctuationscomplex laws and regulations that are administered and enforced by a number of governmental authorities, including the FSA and Ministry of Finance (MOF) in Japan, and state insurance regulators, the SEC, the NAIC, the FIO, the U.S. Department of Justice, state attorneys general, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the U.S. Treasury, including the IRS, in the yen/dollar exchange rate.

DueUnited States, each of which exercises a degree of interpretive latitude. In addition, proposals regarding the global regulation of insurance are under discussion, and changes to corporate form that attend the sizeconversion of Aflac Japan where our functional currencyto a subsidiary may introduce new forms of regulation compared to those with which the Company has historically been subject. For example, AAMJ is licensed as a discretionary asset manager under the Japan Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and is subject to rules of the Japan Investment Advisors Association, a self-regulatory organization with mandatory membership for Japan investment managers. Consequently, the Company is subject to the risk that compliance with any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of a legal or regulatory issue may not result in compliance with another regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of the same issue, particularly when compliance is judged in hindsight. There is also a risk that any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of a legal or regulatory issue may change over time to the Company's detriment. In addition, changes in the overall legal or regulatory environment may, even absent any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of an issue changing, cause us to change the Company's views regarding the actions the Company needs to take from a legal or regulatory risk management perspective, thus necessitating changes to the Company's practices that may, in some cases, limit its ability to grow or otherwise negatively impact the profitability of the Company's business.

The primary purpose of insurance company regulatory supervision is the Japanese yen, fluctuationsprotection of insurance policyholders, rather than investors. The extent of regulation varies, but generally is governed by state statutes in the yen/dollar exchange rateUnited States and by the FSA and the MOF in Japan. These systems of supervision and regulation cover, among other things:

standards of establishing and setting premium rates and the approval thereof
standards of minimum capital and reserve requirements and solvency margins, including RBC measures
restrictions on, limitations on and required approval of certain transactions between the Company's insurance subsidiaries and their affiliates, including management fee arrangements
restrictions on the nature, quality and concentration of investments

23



restrictions on the types of terms and conditions that the Company can include in the insurance policies offered by its primary insurance operations
limitations on the amount of dividends that insurance subsidiaries can pay
the existence and licensing status of a company under circumstances where it is not writing new or renewal business
certain required methods of accounting
reserves for unearned premiums, losses and other purposes
assignment of residual market business and potential assessments for the provision of funds necessary for the settlement of covered claims under certain policies provided by impaired, insolvent or failed insurance companies
administrative practices requirements
imposition of fines and other sanctions
Regulatory authorities periodically re-examine existing laws and regulations applicable to insurance companies and their products. Changes in these laws and regulations, or in interpretations thereof, could have a significantmaterial adverse effect on our reportedthe Company's financial positioncondition and results of operations. Aflac Japan's premiumsIf the Company's subsidiaries fail to meet the minimum capital or operational requirements established by its respective regulators, they could be subject to examination or corrective action, or the Company's financial strength ratings could be downgraded, or both.

Various forms of federal oversight and approximately halfregulation of its investment income are receivedinsurance were signed into law by the prior U.S. presidential administration. For example, the ACA gave the U.S. federal government direct regulatory authority over the business of health insurance and made significant changes to the U.S. health care insurance marketplace, including the imposition of an individual medical insurance coverage mandate (which has since been repealed effective 2019 by the Tax Act), penalties on certain employers for failing to provide adequate coverage, the creation of health insurance exchanges, and proscriptions regarding coverage and exclusions as well as medical loss ratios. The legislation also includes changes in yen. Claimsgovernment reimbursements and expenses are paid in yen,tax credits for individuals and we purchase yen-denominated assetsemployers and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. Thesealters federal and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into dollars for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, fluctuationsstate regulation of health insurers. The ACA, as enacted, does not require material changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate candesign of the Company's insurance products. However, indirect consequences of the legislation and regulations could present challenges that could potentially have a significant

17



effectan impact on our reportedthe Company's sales model, financial positioncondition and results of operations. The United States Congress may continue to consider legislation that would repeal and replace key provisions of the ACA. There can be no assurance that any legislation affecting the ACA will be passed by Congress, nor as to the ultimate timing or provisions of any such legislation, nor as to the effect of any such legislation on the design or marketability of the Company's insurance products.

In addition, Dodd-Frank intended to reduce risk of a financial crisis, contains multiple provisions that could impact the Company's business as rules are finalized and implemented. While it is difficult to isolate the impact of Dodd Frank from other government and central bank actions and general market conditions since the financial crisis, the Company believes that the Dodd-Frank Act, in particular bank capital requirements, limits on proprietary trading and derivatives regulation, has affected the value of its holdings in banks and other financial institutions, and impacted pricing, liquidity, and the Company's general ability to conduct financial and capital market transactions. Dodd Frank is expansive in scope and, among other things, requires the adoption of extensive regulations and numerous regulating decisions, many of which have been adopted. The presidential administration in the United States and Congress have stated proposals to reform or repeal certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, some of which have been implemented. The Company cannot predict with any degree of certainty the ultimate effects (if any) that Dodd Frank, or subsequent implementation of regulations and decisions, will have on its U.S. business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Compliance with applicable laws and regulations is time consuming and personnel-intensive, and changes in these laws and regulations may materially increase the Company's direct and indirect compliance and other expenses of doing business, thus having a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Tax rates applicable to the Company may change.

The Company is subject to taxation in Japan, and in the U.S. under federal and numerous state and local tax jurisdictions. In preparing the Company's financial statements, the Company estimates the amount of tax that will become payable, but the Company's effective tax rate may be different than estimates due to numerous factors including accounting for income taxes, the mix of earnings from Japan and the U.S., the results of tax audits, adjustments to the value of uncertain tax positions, changes to estimates and other factors. Further, changes in U.S. or Japan tax laws or interpretations of such laws could increase the Company's corporate taxes and reduce earnings.


24



The Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, effective January 1, 2018 the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated or reduced certain deductions and credits, and limited the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation.

The Tax Act also transitions international corporate taxation from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system, which in light of the current tax treatment of Aflac Japan has the effect of subjecting the earnings of Aflac Japan to Japan taxation and subjecting the Company’s other earnings, including the consolidated earnings of the Parent Company, to U.S. taxation.

These changes became effective on January 1, 2018. Because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the period of enactment, during the period ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recorded a net deferred tax liability reduction of $1.9 billion benefit in 2017. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional amount of deferred tax liabilities (DTLs) related to the Japan tax computation and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability. The impact of the Tax Act, including the preliminary estimate for the change in tax rate that was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2017, adjustments booked during the fourth quarter of 2018 which rendered final values related to the tax rate, and the Company's combined U.S. and Japanese effective income tax rate, may be adjusted in future periods, whenpossibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations and assumptions the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollarsCompany has made, tax guidance that may be issued and actions the Company make take as a result of the Tax Act. Without limiting the foregoing, additional forthcoming guidance from the U.S. Department of the Treasury and/or the U.S. IRS related to the Tax Act could significantly impact the level of valuation allowance respecting the amount of foreign tax credits claimed by the Company with regard to the operations of Aflac Japan.

In addition, it remains difficult to predict the timing and effect that future tax law changes could have on the Company's earnings both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. Any of these factors could cause the Company to experience an effective tax rate significantly different from previous periods or our current estimates. If the Company's effective tax rate were to increase, the Company's financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Defaults, downgrades, widening credit spreads or other events impairing the value of the fixed maturity securities and loan receivables in the Company's investment portfolio may reduce the Company's earnings and capital position.
The Company is subject to the risk that the issuers and/or guarantors of fixed maturity securities and loan receivables the Company owns may default on principal or interest. A significant portion of the Company's portfolio represents an unsecured obligation of the issuer, including some that may be subordinated to other debt in the issuer’s capital structure. In these cases, many factors can influence the overall creditworthiness of the issuer and ultimately its ability to service and repay the Company's holdings. This can include changes in the global economy, the company's assets, strategy, or management, shifts in the dynamics of the industries in which they compete, their access to additional funding, and the overall health of the credit markets. Factors unique to the Company's securities including contractual protections such as financial covenants or relative position in the issuer's capital structure also influence the value of the Company's holdings.

Most of the Company's investments carry a rating by one or more of the NRSROs. Any change in the rating agencies' approach to evaluating credit and assigning an opinion could negatively impact the fair value of the Company's portfolio. The Company employs a team of credit analysts to monitor the creditworthiness of the issuers in its portfolio. Any credit-related declines in the fair value of positions held in the Company's portfolio believed to be reported. Whennot temporary in nature will negatively impact the yen strengthens, translating yenCompany's net income and capital position through impairment and other credit related losses. These losses would also affect the Company's solvency ratios in the United States and Japan. Aflac Japan has certain regulatory accounting requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by credit-related losses, which may be different from U.S. GAAP and statutory requirements. These impairment losses could negatively impact Aflac Japan's earnings, and the corresponding dividends and capital deployment.

The Company is also subject to the risk that any collateral providing credit enhancement to the Company's positions could deteriorate. These instruments may include senior secured first lien loans, such as commercial mortgage loans, bank loans, middle market loans, and loan-backed securities where the underlying loan or collateral notes may default on principal, interest, or other payments, causing an adverse change in cash flows to the positions held in the Company's investment portfolio.

The Company is exposed to sovereign credit risk through instruments issued directly by governments and government entities as well as banks and other institutions that rely in part on the strength of the underlying government

25



for their credit quality. In addition to the United States and Japan, many governments, especially in Europe, have been subject to rating downgrades due to the need for fiscal and budgetary remediation and structural reforms, reduced economic activity, and investment needed to support banks or other systemically important entities. Additional downgrades or default of the Company's sovereign issuers will have a negative impact on its portfolio and could reduce the Company's earnings and capital.

In addition to the Company's exposure to the underlying fundamental credit strength of the issuers of its fixed maturity securities and the underlying risk of default, the Company is also exposed to the general movement in credit market spreads. A widening of credit spreads could reduce the value of the Company's existing portfolio, create unrealized losses on its investment portfolio, and reduce the Company's adjusted capital position which is used in determining the SMR in Japan. This widening of credit spreads could, however, increase the net investment income on new credit investments. Conversely, a tightening of credit spreads could increase the value of the Company's existing portfolio and create unrealized gains on its investment portfolio. This tightening of credit spreads could also reduce the net investment income available to the Company on new credit investments. Increased market volatility also makes it difficult to value certain of the Company's investment holdings (see the Critical Accounting Estimates section in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, of this Form 10-K).

For more information regarding credit risk, see the Credit Risk subsection of Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, of this Form 10-K.

A decline in the creditworthiness of other financial institutions could adversely affect the Company.

The Company has exposure to and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including broker dealers, derivative counterparties, commercial banks and other institutions.

The Company uses derivative instruments to mitigate various risks associated with its investment portfolio, notes payable, and subsidiary dividends. The Company enters into dollars causes more dollars to be reported. Any unrealizeda variety of agreements involving assorted instruments including foreign currency translation adjustmentsforward contracts; foreign currency options; foreign currency swaps; and interest rate swaptions. The Company's use of derivatives results in financial exposure to derivative counterparties. If the Company's counterparties fail or refuse to honor their obligations under derivative instruments, the Company's hedges of the risks will be ineffective, and the Company's financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The Company engages in derivative transactions directly with unaffiliated third parties under International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) agreements and other documentation. Most of the ISDA agreements also include Credit Support Annexes (CSAs) provisions, which generally provide for two-way collateral postings at the first dollar of exposure. The Company mitigates the risk that counterparties to transactions might be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations by monitoring counterparty credit exposure and collateral value while generally requiring that collateral be posted at the outset of the transaction. In addition, a significant portion of the derivative transactions have provisions that give the counterparty the right to terminate the transaction upon a downgrade of Aflac’s financial strength rating. The actual amount of payments that the Company could be required to make, depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions, and other factors prevailing at and after the time of the downgrade. If the Company is required to post collateral to support derivative contracts and/or pay cash to settle the contracts at maturity, the Company's liquidity could be strained. In addition, the Company's cleared swaps result in counterparty exposure to clearing brokers and central clearinghouses; while this exposure is mitigated in part by clearinghouse and clearing broker capital and regulation, no assurance can be provided that these counterparties will fulfill their obligations. The Company also has exposure to counterparties to securities lending transactions in the event they fail to return loaned securities. The Company is also exposed to the risk that there may be a decline in value of securities posted as collateral for securities lending programs or a decline in value of investments made with cash posted as collateral for such programs.

Further, the Company has agreements with various financial institutions for the distribution of its insurance products. For example, at December 31, 2018, the Company had agreements with 371 banks to market Aflac's products in Japan. Sales through these banks represented 4.6% of Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales in 2018. Any material adverse effect on these or other financial institutions could also have an adverse effect on the Company's sales.
The Company has entered into significant reinsurance transactions with large, highly rated counterparties. Negative events or developments affecting any one of these counterparties could have an adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
All of these risks related to exposure to other financial institutions could adversely impact the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

26




The determination of the amount of impairments taken on the Company's investments is based on significant valuation judgments and could materially impact its results of operations or financial position.
An investment in a fixed maturity security is impaired if the fair value falls below book value. The Company regularly reviews its entire investment portfolio for declines in value. The majority of the Company's investments are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment using the Company's debt impairment model.
The Company's debt impairment model includes emphasis on the ultimate collection of the cash flows from its investments. The determination of the amount of impairments under this model is based upon the Company's periodic evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective securities. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.
For the Company's fixed maturity securities reported in the available-for-sale portfolio, the Company reports the investments at fair value in the statement of financial condition and records any unrealized gain or loss in the value of the asset in accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result, yen weakeningFor the Company's held-to-maturity securities portfolio, the Company reports the investments at amortized cost. Under the debt impairment model, the determination of whether an impairment in value is other than temporary is based largely on the Company's evaluation of the issuer's creditworthiness. The Company must apply considerable judgment in determining the likelihood of the security recovering in value while the Company owns it. Factors that may influence this include the Company's assessment of the issuer’s ability to continue making timely payments of interest and principal, the overall level of interest rates and credit spreads, and other factors. The Company also verifies whether it has the effectintent to sell or if it is more likely than not the Company would be required to sell the security prior to recovery of suppressing current year results in relationits amortized cost. If the Company determines it is unlikely to recover the prior year, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying current year results in relation to the prior year. In addition, the weakeningbook value of the yen relativeinstrument prior to disposal of the dollarsecurity, the Company will generally adversely affectreduce the carrying value of our yen-denominated investments in dollar terms. Foreign currency translation also impacts the computation of our risk-based capital ratio because Aflac Japan is consolidated in our U.S. statutory filings duesecurity to its status as a branch. Our required capital, as determined by the application of risk factors to our assetsfair value and liabilities, is proportionately more sensitive to changesrecognize any associated impairment loss in the exchange rate than our total adjusted capital. As a result, whenCompany's consolidated statement of earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on the yen strengthens relative tonature of the dollar, our RBC and SMR is suppressed. We engage in certain foreign currency hedging activities for the purpose of hedging the yen exposure to our net investment in our branch operations in Japan. These hedging activities are limited in scope and we cannot provide assurance that these activities will be effective.loss.

Aflac Japan is exposed to further foreign exchange risk through its investment in unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities. When the yen strengthens, the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments will experience unrealized foreign exchange losses, negatively impacting SMR. For regulatory accounting purposes for Aflac Japan, there are certain requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by rising interest rates, credit-related losses, or changes in the yen/dollarforeign exchange, rate and could negatively impactimpacting Aflac Japan's earnings and the corresponding repatriationdividend and capital deployment.

Additionally, we are exposed to economic currency risk when yen cash flows are converted into dollars, resulting in an increase or decrease in our earnings when exchange gains orThe Company's management updates its evaluations regularly as conditions change and as new information becomes available and reflects impairment losses are realized. This primarily occurs when we repatriate funds from Aflac Japan to Aflac U.S., but it also has an impact when yen cash is converted to U.S. dollars for investment into U.S. dollar-denominated assets (as described above). The exchange rates prevailing at the time of repatriation may differ from the exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. We engage in foreign currency hedging activities to mitigate the exposure to this foreign exchange risk.

We engage in monthly stress testing related to derivatives used to hedge profit repatriation. This stress testing assures that we have sufficient eligible collateral to post in the event foreign exchange rates move against our current positions. The liquidity test is performed before any new derivative positions are entered into as well as on a forward-looking basis. The test simulates a three standard deviation movementCompany's income statement when considered necessary. Furthermore, additional impairments may need to be taken in the foreign exchange rates over a three-month period. Given that we have a large exposure to JGBs, a similar test isfuture. Historical trends may not performed for the derivative positions on our U.S. dollar hedge program in the Aflac Japan investment portfolio.be indicative of future impairments.

For more information regarding foreign currency risk, see the Currency Risk subsection within the Market Risks of Financial Instruments section of MD&A in this report.

If future policy benefits, claims or expenses exceed those anticipated in establishing premiums and reserves, our financial results would be adversely affected.

We establish and carry, as a liability, reserves based on estimates of how much will be required to pay for future benefits and claims. We calculate these reserves using various assumptions and estimates, including premiums we will receive over the assumed life of the policy; the timing, frequency and severity of the events covered by the insurance policy; and the investment returns on the assets we purchase with a portion of our net cash flow from operations. These assumptions and estimates are inherently uncertain. Accordingly, we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts that we will pay for, or the timing of payment of, actual benefits and claims or whether the assets supporting the policy liabilities will grow to the level we assume prior to payment of benefits or claims. If our actual experience is different from our assumptions or estimates, our reserves may prove inadequate. As a result, we would incur a charge to earnings in the period in which we determine such a shortfall exists, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
As a holding company, the Parent Company depends on the ability of its subsidiaries to transfer funds to it to meet its debt service and other obligations and to pay dividends on its common stock.
The Parent Company is a holding company and has no direct operations, orand its most significant assets other thanare the stock of its subsidiaries. Because we conduct ourthe Parent Company conducts its operations through ourits operating subsidiaries, we dependthe Parent Company depends on those entities for dividends and other payments to generate the funds necessary to meet ourits debt service and other obligations, and to pay dividends on ourand conduct repurchases of its common stock. stock, and to make investments into its subsidiaries or external investment opportunities.
Aflac is domiciled in Nebraska and is subject to insurance regulations that impose certain

18



limitations and restrictions on payments of dividends, management fees, loans and advances by Aflac to the Parent Company. The Nebraska insurance statutes require prior approval for dividend distributions that exceed the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. In addition, the Nebraska insurance department must approve service arrangements and other transactions within the affiliated group of companies. In addition,After the Japan branch conversion, the Nebraska insurance department and the FSA mayapproved their respective domiciled insurance company service arrangements and transactions. The FSA does not allow profit repatriationsdividends or other transferspayments from Aflac Japan if they would cause Aflacunless it meets certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at the Japan to lack sufficient financial strength for the protection of Japanese policyholders.subsidiary will be defined as retained earnings plus other capital reserve less net after-tax net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities.
The ability of Aflac and Aflac Japan to pay dividends or make other payments to the Parent Company could also be constrained by our dependencethe Company's dependency on financial strength ratings from independent rating agencies. OurThe Company's ratings from these agencies depend to a large extent on Aflac's capitalization level. Any inability of Aflac to pay

27



dividends or make other payments to the Parent Company could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's financial condition and results of operations. There
For the foregoing reasons, there is no assurance that the earnings from, or other available assets of, ourthe Parent Company's operating subsidiaries will be sufficient to make distributions to enable usthe Company to operate.
Any decrease in the Company's financial strength or debt ratings may have an adverse effect on its competitive position and access to liquidity and capital.

Financial strength ratings can play an important role in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. On an ongoing basis, NRSROs review the financial performance and condition of many insurers, including Aflac and its competitors. They may assign multiple ratings including a financial strength rating, reflecting their view of the insurer’s ability to pay claims on a timely basis, and ratings on an insurer’s senior and subordinated debt obligations, indicating their view of an insurer’s ability to make timely payments on their debt obligations.

NRSROs may change their ratings or outlook on an insurer's ratings due to a variety of factors including the NRSRO’s assessment of the insurer’s strength of operations and overall financial condition. Some factors that may influence ratings include competitive position; profitability; cash generation and other sources of liquidity; capital levels; quality of the investment portfolio; and perception of management capabilities. The successratings assigned to Aflac by the NRSROs are important factors in the Company's ability to access liquidity and capital from the bank market, debt capital markets or other available sources, such as reinsurance transactions. Downgrades to Aflac's credit ratings could give its derivative counterparties the right to require early termination of ourderivatives transactions or delivery of additional collateral, thereby adversely affecting the Company's liquidity.

In view of the difficulties experienced after the financial crisis by many financial institutions, including those in the insurance industry, the NRSROs have heightened the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions. Steps taken by the NRSROs include an increase in the frequency and scope of their reviews, additional information requests from the companies that they rate, including additional information regarding the valuation of investment securities held, and, in certain cases, an increase in the capital and other requirements employed in their models for maintenance of certain rating levels.

On September 16, 2015, S&P downgraded their credit rating of Japan’s sovereign debt. Following this action, they also downgraded several other foreign insurers, including Aflac. Although Aflac is a U.S.-based insurer, Aflac's significant operations in Japan and corresponding regulation by the Japanese FSA, combined with its significant exposure to JGBs as outlined above, resulted in S&P downgrading the financial strength rating of Aflac's core insurance operations to A+ and its senior debt rating to A-, both with a stable outlook. While S&P made no further downgrades to Aflac's ratings between 2016 and 2018, they have stated in the past that a downgrade of Japan's sovereign rating could lead to a downgrade of Aflac's financial strength rating. As a matter of policy, S&P rarely rates insurance companies above the sovereign long-term rating of the country of domicile because during times of stress, the sovereign’s regulatory and supervisory powers may restrict an insurer’s or financial system’s flexibility.

In addition to the impact on Aflac's access to liquidity, as mentioned above, a downgrade of Aflac's ratings could have a material adverse effect on agent recruiting and retention, sales, competitiveness and the marketability of its products which could negatively impact Aflac's liquidity, operating results and financial condition. Additionally, sales through the bank channel in Japan could be adversely affected as a result of their reliance and sensitivity to ratings levels.

The Company cannot predict what actions rating agencies may take, or what actions the Company may take in response to the actions of rating agencies, which could adversely affect Aflac's business. As with other companies in the financial services industry, Aflac's ratings could be downgraded at any time and without any notice by any NRSRO.


28



The Company's risk management policies and procedures may prove to be ineffective and leave the Company exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risk, which could adversely affect the Company's businesses or result in losses.

The Company has developed an enterprise-wide risk management and governance framework to mitigate risk and loss to the Company. The Company maintains policies, procedures and controls intended to identify, measure, monitor, report and analyze the risks to which the Company is exposed.
However, there are inherent limitations to risk management strategies because risk may exist, or emerge in the future, that the Company has not appropriately anticipated or identified. If the Company's risk management framework proves ineffective, the Company may suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected. As the Company's businesses change and the markets in which it operates evolve, the Company's risk management framework may not evolve at the same pace as those changes. As a result, there is a risk that new products or new business depends in part on effective information technology systems and on continuing to develop and implement improvements in technology.

Our business depends in large part on our technology systems for interacting with employers, policyholders, sales associates, and brokers, and our business strategy involves providing customers with easy-to-use products to meet their needs and ensuring employees have the technology in place to support those needs. Some of our information technology systems and software are older, legacy-type systemsstrategies may present risks that are less efficient and require an ongoing commitmentnot appropriately identified, monitored or managed. In times of significant resources to maintainmarket stress, unanticipated market movements or upgrade to current standards (including adequate business continuity procedures). We are in a continual state of upgrading and enhancing our business systems; however, these changes are always challenging in our complex integrated environment. Our success is dependent in large part on maintainingunanticipated claims experience resulting from greater than expected morbidity, mortality, longevity, or improvingpersistency, the effectiveness of existing systemsthe Company's risk management strategies may be limited, resulting in losses to the Company. In addition, under difficult or less liquid market conditions, the Company's risk management strategies may not be effective because other market participants may be using the same or similar strategies to manage risk under the same challenging market conditions. In such circumstances, it may be difficult or more expensive for the Company to mitigate risk due to the activity of such other market participants.
Many of the Company's risk management strategies or techniques are based upon historical customer and continuingmarket behavior and all such strategies and techniques are based to developsome degree on management’s subjective judgment. The Company cannot provide assurance that its risk management framework, including the underlying assumptions or strategies, will be accurate and enhance information systemseffective.
Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies, procedures and controls to record properly and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies, procedures and controls may not be fully effective. Models are utilized by the Company's businesses and corporate areas primarily to project future cash flows associated with pricing products, calculating reserves and valuing assets, as well as in evaluating risk and determining capital requirements, among other uses. These models are utilized under a risk management policy approved by the Company's executive risk management committees, however, the models may not operate properly and rely on assumptions and projections that support our business processesare inherently uncertain. As the Company's businesses continue to grow and evolve, the number and complexity of models the Company utilizes expands, increasing the Company's exposure to error in a cost-efficient manner.the design, implementation or use of models, including the associated input data and assumptions.

Past or future misconduct by the Company's employees or employees of the Company's third parties (suppliers which are cost-based relationships and alliance partners which are revenue-generating relationships) could result in violations of law by the Company, regulatory sanctions and/or serious reputational or financial harm and the precautions the Company takes to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Despite the Company's published Supplier Code of Conduct, due diligence of the Company's alliance partners, and rigorous contracting procedures (including financial, legal, IT security, and risk reviews), there can be no assurance that controls and procedures that the Company employs, which are designed to assess third party viability and prevent the Company from taking excessive or inappropriate risks, will be effective. Additionally, the use of third parties also poses operational risks that could result in financial loss, operational disruption, brand damage, or compliance issues. Inadequate oversight of Aflac’s third party suppliers due to the lack of policies, procedures, training and governance may lead to financial loss or damage to the Aflac brand.
The concentration of ourthe Company's investment portfolios in any particular single-issuer or sector of the economy may have an adverse effect on ourthe Company's financial position or results of operations.
Negative events or developments affecting any particular single issuer, industry, group of related industries, asset class or geographic sector may have an adverse impact on a particular holding or set of holdings. We seekholdings, which may increase risk of loss from defaults due to non-payment of interest or principal. The Company seeks to minimize this risk by maintaining an appropriate level of diversification. To the extent we havethe Company has concentrated positions, it could have an adverse effect on ourthe Company's results of operations and financial position. OurThe Company's global investment guidelines establish concentration limits for ourits investment portfolios.


At December 31, 2015, we held approximately $36.9 billion, or 38.4% of our total debt and perpetual securities, in JGBs. After downgrades by two rating agencies in 2015, JGBs were rated A1/A+/A at December 31, 2015 by Moody's, S&P and Fitch, respectively. At December 31, 2015, 11% of our total portfolio of debt and perpetual securities was in the bank and financial institution sector.
29



For further details on the concentrations within ourthe Company's investment portfolios, see the Analysis of Financial Condition section of Item 7, MD&A, inand the Credit Risk section of Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, of this report.Form 10-K.

A decline in the creditworthiness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.

We have exposure to and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including broker dealers, derivative counterparties, commercial banks and other institutions.

We use derivative instruments to mitigate various risks associated with our investment portfolio, notes payable, and profit repatriation. We enter into a variety of agreements involving assorted instruments including foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency options, foreign currency and interest rate swaps, and options on interest rate swaps (or interest rate swaptions). To provide additional alternatives to increase our overall portfolio yield while managing our overall currency risk, starting in 2012, we have invested a significant portion of the investable cash flow generated by Aflac Japan into U.S. dollar-denominated investment grade public bonds and hedged these bonds to yen through the use of currency forward and option contracts. The derivative forward and option contracts are of a shorter maturity than the hedged bonds which creates roll-over risks within the hedging program. Due to changes in market environments, there is a risk the hedges become ineffective and lose the corresponding hedge accounting treatment. At December 31, 2015, we held foreign currency forwards and options of approximately $14.3 billion notional associated with Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-

19



denominated investments referenced above, foreign currency swaps of $3.7 billion notional associated with our notes payable, and foreign currency forwards and options of approximately $1.0 billion notional used to economically hedge profit repatriation. The Company's increased use of derivatives has increased our financial exposure to derivative counterparties. To mitigate counterparty exposure, we have established internal limits based on counterparties' credit ratings. Our internal limits include deposit and derivative exposure that we monitor on a daily basis. If our counterparties fail or refuse to honor their obligations under derivative instruments, our hedges of the risks will be ineffective.

We engage in derivative transactions directly with unaffiliated third parties under International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) agreements and other documentation. Most of the ISDA agreements we enter into also include Credit Support Annexes (CSA), which generally provide for two-way collateral postings, in certain cases at the first dollar of exposure and in other cases once various rating and exposure threshold levels are triggered. We attempt to mitigate the risk that counterparties to transactions might be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations by monitoring counterparty credit exposure and collateral value while generally requiring that collateral be posted at the outset of a transaction or that collateral be posted upon the occurrence of certain events or circumstances. In addition, a significant portion of the derivative transactions have provisions that require collateral to be posted upon a downgrade of our long-term debt ratings or give the counterparty the right to terminate the transaction upon a downgrade of Aflac’s financial strength ratings. The actual amount of collateral required to be posted to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the aggregate amount of payments that we could be required to make, depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions, and other factors prevailing at and after the time of any such downgrade. If the Company is required to post collateral to support derivative contracts and/or pay cash to settle the contracts at maturity, the Company's liquidity could be strained. We have implemented a liquidity test to determine that sufficient collateral is available when the Company is required to post collateral and/or pay cash.

Further, we have agreements with various financial institutions for the distribution of our insurance products. For example, at December 31, 2015, we had agreements with 372 banks to market Aflac's products in Japan. Sales through these banks represented 14.9% of Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales in 2015. Any material adverse effect on these or other financial institutions could also have an adverse effect on our sales.
The Company has entered into significant reinsurance transactions with large, highly rated counterparties. Negative events or developments affecting any one of these counterparties could have an adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
All of these risks related to exposure to other financial institutions could adversely impact our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

Sales of our products and services are dependent on our ability to attract, retain and support a network of qualified sales associates.
Our sales could be adversely affected if our sales networks deteriorate or if we do not adequately provide support, training and education for our existing network. Competition exists for sales associates with demonstrated ability. We compete with other insurers and financial institutions primarily on the basis of our products, compensation, support services and financial rating. An inability to attract and retain qualified sales associates could have a material adverse effect on sales and our results of operations and financial condition. Our sales associates are independent contractors and may sell products of our competitors. If our competitors offer products that are more attractive than ours, or pay higher commissions than we do, these sales associates may concentrate their efforts on selling our competitors' products instead of ours. In addition to our commissioned sales force, Aflac has expanded its sales leadership team to include a salaried sales force of over 175 market directors and broker sales professionals. Our ability to attract and retain top talent in these salaried roles has a material impact on our sales success.
The valuation of ourthe Company's investments and derivatives includes methodologies, estimations and assumptions which are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may adversely affect ourthe Company's results of operations or financial condition.
The vast majorityCompany reports a significant amount of ourits fixed maturity securities and other financial instruments are subject to theat fair value classification provisions under U.S. GAAP, which specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on observable or unobservable inputs to valuations, and relates to our investment securities classified as available for sale in our investment portfolio, which comprised $67.8 billion (64%) of our total cash and invested assets, and our entire derivatives portfolio, comprising $676 million of derivative assets and $371 million of derivative liabilities, as of December 31, 2015. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we have categorized these

20



securities and derivatives into a three-level hierarchy, based on the priority of the inputs to the respective valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1). It gives the next priority to quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities and other inputs that can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities (Level 2). The lowest priority represents unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity and that reflect the reporting entity's understanding about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (Level 3). An asset or liability's classification within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its valuation.
At December 31, 2015, approximately 28% and 72% of our total available-for-sale securities represented Level 1 and Level 2 securities, respectively, and approximately 62% and 38% of our total derivatives exposure were classified as Level 2 and Level 3, respectively. Financial instruments may be transferred to Level 3 from Levels 1 and 2 during periods of market disruption or illiquidity.
value. As such, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation as well as valuation methods which are more sophisticated, thereby resulting in values which may be greater or less than the value at which the investments may be ultimately sold. Rapidly changing and unprecedented credit and equity market conditions could materially impact the valuation of securities as reported within ourthe Company's consolidated financial statements and the period-to-period changes in value could vary significantly.

Valuations of ourthe Company's derivatives fluctuate with changes in underlying market variables, such as interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. During periods of market turbulence created by political instability, economic uncertainty, government interventions or other factors, wethe Company may experience significant changes in the volatility of ourits derivative valuations. Extreme market conditions can also affect the liquidity of such instruments creating marked differences in transaction levels and counterparty valuations. Depending on the severity and direction of the movements in its derivative valuations, the Company will face increases in the amount of collateral required to be posted with its counterparties. Liquidity stresses to the Company may also occur if the required collateral amounts increase significantly over a very short period of time. Conversely, the Company may be exposed to an increase in counterparty credit risk for short periods of time while calling collateral from its counterparties.


Elimination of LIBOR as an interest rate benchmark may create uncertainty in valuation of loans, derivatives and other assets where valuation and interest rates are based on LIBOR, and may create uncertainty in the pricing of such assets in markets for their sale and disposition.

For further discussion on investment and derivative valuations, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, and Notes 1, 3, 4, and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.Form 10-K.


Managing key executive succession is critical to the Company's success.
The determinationCompany would be adversely affected if it fails to adequately plan for succession of the amount of impairments taken on our investments is based on significant valuation judgments and could materially impact our results of operations or financial position.
An investment in a fixed maturity, perpetual or equity security is impaired if the fair value falls below book value. We regularly review our entire investment portfolio for declines in value. The majority of our investments are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment using our debt impairment model, while our investments in equities and below-investment-grade perpetual securities are evaluated using our equity impairment model.
Our debt impairment model includes emphasis on the ultimate collection of the cash flows from our investments. The determination of the amount of impairments under this model is based upon our periodic evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective securities. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.
For our fixed maturity and perpetual securities reported in the available-for-sale portfolio, we report the investments at fair value in the statement of financial condition and record any unrealized gain or loss in the value of the asset in accumulated other comprehensive income. For our held-to-maturity portfolio, we report the investments at amortized cost. The determination of whether an impairment in value is other than temporary is based largely on our evaluation of the issuer's creditworthiness. We must apply considerable judgment in determining the likelihood of the security recovering in value while we own it. Factors that may influence this include our assessment of the issuer’s ability to continue making timely payments of interest and principal, the overall level of interest rates and credit spreads,its senior management and other factors. We also verify our intent to holdkey executives. While the securities until they recover in value. If we determine it is unlikely we will recover our book valueCompany has succession plans and employment arrangements with certain key executives, these plans cannot guarantee that the services of the instrument prior to our disposal of the security, we will reduce the carrying value of the security to its fair value and recognize any associated impairment loss in our consolidated statement of earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on the nature of the loss.

21



Our investments in perpetual securities that are rated below investment grade and equity securities are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment under our equity impairment model. This impairment model focuses on the severity of a security's decline in fair value coupled with the length of time the fair value of the security has been below cost or amortized cost and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. For equity securities, we also verify our intent to hold the securities until they recover in value.
For regulatory accounting purposes for Aflac Japan, there are certain requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by rising interest rates or credit-related losses, negatively impacting Aflac Japan's earnings and corresponding repatriation and capital deployment.
Our management updates its evaluations regularly as conditions change and as new information becomes available and reflects impairment losses in the Company's income statement when considered necessary. Furthermore, additional impairments may need to be taken in the future. Historical trends may not be indicative of future impairments.

We are subject to certain risks as a result of our investments in perpetual securities.
As of December 31, 2015, we held $1.8 billion of perpetual securities, at amortized cost, which represented 1.9% of our total portfolio of debt and perpetual securities. Perpetual securities have characteristics of both debt and equity instruments. These securities do not have a stated maturity date, but generally have a stated fixed rate coupon that was fixed at the time of issuance but then changes to a floating rate coupon at some predetermined date. Most perpetual securities have call features including the ability of the issuer to retire the debt at par upon the change to a floating rate security. Generally, the mechanics of the floating rate change were intended at the time of issuance to incent the borrower to call the instrument, having the effect of creating an expected economic maturity date. We believe many of the issuers of our perpetual securities will call the instruments upon a change in payment structure but there are no assurances the issuers will do so. While we have recently experienced calls for certain perpetual securities upon their economic maturity dates, there can be no assurance the remaining issuers will have the ability to repay the outstanding principal amount.
Perpetual securities may contain provisions allowing the borrower to defer paying interest for a time. In some cases, we have contractual provisions that stipulate any deferred interest payment accumulates for our benefit and must be paid in the future. There is no assurance such issuers will not choose to defer making payments orthese executives will be able to honor a cumulative deferral feature.

There is also a risk that the accounting for these perpetual securities could change in a manner that would have an adverse impact on the reporting for these securities. At the date of filing this Form 10-K, the SEC does not objectavailable to the use of a debt impairment model for impairment recognition of these securities as long as there is no significant deterioration in the credit condition of the perpetual securities. The debt impairment model allows the holder to consider whether or not interestCompany, and principal payments will be received in accordance with contractual terms and whether the holder has the intent to sell or if it is more likely than not would be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost. The equity impairment model applied to below-investment-grade perpetual securities, by contrast, emphasizes the length of time a security's fair value has been below its cost basis and the percentage decline to determine whether an impairment should be recorded, without consideration to the holder's intent and ability to hold the security until recovery in value. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) recently issued new accounting guidance on financial instruments classification and measurement and is also working on the financial instruments project which addresses impairment and hedging. The impact of the FASB project is uncertain but could result in changes to the current accounting model for perpetual securities. For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on our financial position or results of operations see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Any decrease in our financial strength or debt ratings may have an adverse effect on our competitive position and access to liquidity and capital.

Financial strength ratings are important factors in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies and generally have an effect on the business of insurance companies. On an ongoing basis NRSROs review the financial performance and condition of insurers and may downgrade or change the outlook on an insurer's ratings due to, for example, a change in an insurer's statutory capital; a change in a rating agency's determination of the amount of risk-adjusted capital required to maintain a particular rating; an increase in the perceived risk of an insurer's investment portfolio; a reduced confidence in management; or other considerations that may or may not be under the insurer's control. In addition to financial strength ratings, various NRSROs also publish ratings on our debt. These ratings are indicators of a debt issuer's ability to meet the terms of debt obligations in a timely manner and are important factors in our

22



ability to access liquidity and capital from the debt markets or other available sources, such as reinsurance. Downgrades in our credit ratings could give our derivative counterparties the right to require early termination of derivatives transactions or delivery of additional collateral, thereby adversely affecting our liquidity.

In view of the difficulties experienced after the financial crisis by many financial institutions, including in the insurance industry, the NRSROs have heightened the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions, increased the frequency and scope of their reviews, requested additional information from the companies that they rate, including additional information regarding the valuation of investment securities held, and, in certain cases, have increased the capital and other requirements employed in their models for maintenance of certain rating levels.

On September 16, 2015, S&P downgraded their rating of Japan’s sovereign credit risk. They also downgraded several other foreign insurers, including Aflac. S&P has stated in the past that a downgrade of Japan's sovereign rating would lead to a downgrade of our financial strength rating. S&P rarely rates insurance companies above the sovereign long-term rating of the country of domicile because during times of stress, the sovereign’s regulatory and supervisory powers may restrict an insurer’s or financial system’s flexibility. Although we are a U.S.-based insurer, our significant operations in Japan and corresponding regulation by the Japanese FSA, combined with our significant exposure to JGBs as outlined above, resulted in S&P downgrading Aflac’s financial strength rating to A+ with a stable outlook.

A downgrade in our ratings could have a material adverse effect on agent recruiting and retention, sales, competitiveness and the marketability of our products which could negatively impact our liquidity, operating results and financial condition. Additionally, sales through the bank channel in Japan could be adversely affected as a result of their reliance and sensitivity to ratings levels.if they are not.
We cannot predict what actions rating agencies may take, or what actions we may take in response to the actions of rating agencies, which could adversely affect our business. As with other companies in the financial services industry, our ratings could be downgraded at any time and without any notice by any NRSRO.
Our risk management policies and procedures may prove to be ineffective and leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risk, which could adversely affect our businesses or result in losses.

We have developed an enterprise-wide risk management and governance framework to mitigate risk and loss to the Company. We maintain policies, procedures and controls intended to identify, measure, monitor, report and analyze the risks to which the Company is exposed.
However, there are inherent limitations to risk management strategies because there may exist, or develop in the future, risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, the Company may suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected. As our businesses change and the markets in which we operate evolve, our risk management framework may not evolve at the same pace as those changes. As a result, there is a risk that new products or new business strategies may present risks that are not appropriately identified, monitored or managed. In times of market stress, unanticipated market movements or unanticipated claims experience resulting from greater than expected morbidity, mortality, longevity, or persistency, the effectiveness of our risk management strategies may be limited, resulting in losses to the Company. In addition, under difficult or less liquid market conditions, our risk management strategies may not be effective because other market participants may be using the same or similar strategies to manage risk under the same challenging market conditions. In such circumstances, it may be difficult or more expensive for the Company to mitigate risk due to the activity of such other market participants.
Many of our risk management strategies or techniques are based upon historical customer and market behavior and all such strategies and techniques are based to some degree on management’s subjective judgment. We cannot provide assurance that our risk management framework, including the underlying assumptions or strategies, will be accurate and effective.
Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies, procedures and controls to record properly and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies, procedures and controls may not be fully effective. Models are utilized by our businesses and corporate areas primarily to project future cash flows associated with pricing products, calculating reserves and valuing assets, as well as in evaluating risk and determining capital requirements, among other uses. These models may not operate properly and rely on assumptions and projections that are inherently uncertain. As our businesses continue to grow and evolve, the number and complexity of models we

23



utilize expands, increasing our exposure to error in the design, implementation or use of models, including the associated input data and assumptions. Given that there is risk involved with using any models, we are in the process of developing a model risk framework. Our risk committee has approved a model risk policy, which describes the necessary governance related to our models.
Past or future misconduct by our employees or employees of our third parties (suppliers which are cost-based relationships and alliance partners which are revenue-generating relationships) could result in violations of law by us, regulatory sanctions and/or serious reputational or financial harm and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Despite our published Supplier Code of Conduct, due diligence of our alliance partners, and rigorous contracting procedures (including financial, legal, IT security, and risk reviews), there can be no assurance that controls and procedures that we employ, which are designed to assess third party viability and prevent us from taking excessive or inappropriate risks, will be effective. We review our supplier cost structures and alliance compensation policies and practices as part of our overall risk management program, but it is possible that these cost structures and forms of compensation could inadvertently incentivize excessive or inappropriate risk taking. If our third parties take excessive or inappropriate risks, those risks could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Extensive regulation and changes in legislation can impact profitability and growth.
Aflac's insurance subsidiaries are subject to complex laws and regulations that are administered and enforced by a number of governmental authorities, including state insurance regulators, the SEC, the NAIC, the FIO, the FSA and Ministry of Finance (MOF) in Japan, the U.S. Department of Justice, state attorneys general, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the U.S. Treasury, including the Internal Revenue Service, each of which exercises a degree of interpretive latitude. In addition, proposals regarding the global regulation of insurance are under discussion. Consequently, we are subject to the risk that compliance with any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of a legal or regulatory issue may not result in compliance with another regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of the same issue, particularly when compliance is judged in hindsight. There is also a risk that any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of a legal or regulatory issue may change over time to our detriment. In addition, changes in the overall legal or regulatory environment may, even absent any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of an issue changing, cause us to change our views regarding the actions we need to take from a legal or regulatory risk management perspective, thus necessitating changes to our practices that may, in some cases, limit our ability to grow or otherwise negatively impact the profitability of our business.

The primary purpose of insurance company regulatory supervision is the protection of insurance policyholders, rather than investors. The extent of regulation varies, but generally is governed by state statutes in the United States and by the FSA and the MOF in Japan. These systems of supervision and regulation cover, among other things:

standards of establishing and setting premium rates and the approval thereof
standards of minimum capital and reserve requirements and solvency margins, including risk-based capital measures
restrictions on, limitations on and required approval of certain transactions between our insurance subsidiaries and their affiliates, including management fee arrangements
restrictions on the nature, quality and concentration of investments
restrictions on the types of terms and conditions that we can include in the insurance policies offered by our primary insurance operations
limitations on the amount of dividends that insurance subsidiaries can pay or foreign profits that can be repatriated
the existence and licensing status of a company under circumstances where it is not writing new or renewal business
certain required methods of accounting
reserves for unearned premiums, losses and other purposes
assignment of residual market business and potential assessments for the provision of funds necessary for the settlement of covered claims under certain policies provided by impaired, insolvent or failed insurance companies
administrative practices requirements
imposition of fines and other sanctions

24



Regulatory authorities periodically re-examine existing laws and regulations applicable to insurance companies and their products. Changes in these laws and regulations, or in interpretations thereof, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas, including health care reform legislation, financial services reform legislation, securities regulation, pension regulation, privacy, tort reform legislation and taxation, can significantly and adversely affect insurance companies. Various forms of federal oversight and regulation of insurance have been passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by the president. For example, the ACA, federal health care reform legislation, gives the U.S. federal government direct regulatory authority over the business of health insurance. The reform includes major changes to the U.S. health care insurance marketplace. Among other changes, the reform legislation includes an individual medical insurance coverage mandate, provides for penalties on certain employers for failing to provide adequate coverage, creates health insurance exchanges, and addresses coverage and exclusions as well as medical loss ratios. The legislation also includes changes in government reimbursements and tax credits for individuals and employers and alters federal and state regulation of health insurers. These changes, directed toward major medical health insurance coverage which Aflac does not offer, will continue to be implemented over the next several years. While enacted in 2010, the major elements of the bill became effective on January 1, 2014. We believe that the ACA, as enacted, does not materially affect the design of our insurance products. However, indirect consequences of the legislation and regulations could present challenges and/or opportunities that could potentially have an impact on our sales model, financial condition and results of operations.

On December 18, 2015, the president signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act which included a revision to delay implementation of the Excise Tax on High Cost Plans, better known as the "Cadillac tax.” This tax was originally scheduled to begin in 2017, was previously delayed until 2018, and is now scheduled to begin in 2020. The tax consists of 40% of the cost of employer sponsored health coverage in excess of certain dollar thresholds. In general, only Aflac specified disease and fixed indemnity (i.e. supplemental health) products offered on a pre-tax basis are taken into account under this tax.  

The legislation also makes the tax deductible by the payer. If employers fund coverage on a pre-tax basis, Aflac, as the insurer, would be liable for its pro-rata share of any tax on excess coverage, determined based on the cost of Aflac coverage compared to the total cost of the applicable health coverage in which each employee is enrolled. Making the tax deductible would then reduce the economic impact of any tax that is imposed and payable by Aflac. 

Many employers are concerned about the tax and what impact it will have on benefit offerings in the future. There is confusion in the market about how the tax is calculated and who pays the tax, presenting a risk that some employers will mistakenly conclude thatall supplemental health products are included in the calculation for the tax regardless of pre-tax funding status or whether an employer’s health coverage exceeds the trigger for the tax. Some employers may decide simply to drop coverage of affected supplemental health products, rather than convert it to an after-tax basis. During this extended implementation period, Aflac will be assessing the impact of this tax; educating employers about the tax; and investigating ways to mitigate the impact of the tax. Having employees pay for the coverage on an after-tax basis would exempt affected supplemental health products from the tax.
In 2010, the president signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, commonly known as the Dodd-Frank Act, which, among other things, created a Financial Stability Oversight Council (the Council). In April 2012, the Council released a final rule describing the general process it will follow in determining whether to designate a nonbank financial company for supervision by the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve System (the Board). The Council may designate by a two-thirds vote whether certain nonbank financial companies, including certain insurance companies and insurance holding companies, could pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States, in which case such nonbank financial companies would become subject to prudential regulation by the Board. On April 3, 2013, the Board published a final rule that establishes the requirements for determining when a nonbank financial company is "predominantly engaged in financial activities" - a prerequisite for designation by the Council. Prudential regulation by the Board includes supervision of capital requirements, leverage limits, liquidity requirements and examinations. The Board may limit such company’s ability to enter into mergers, acquisitions and other business combination transactions, restrict its ability to offer financial products, require it to terminate one or more activities, or impose conditions on the manner in which it conducts activities. The Council designated two insurers in 2013 and an additional insurer in 2014 for supervision by the Board. On December 18, 2014, the president signed the Insurance Capital Standards Clarification Act into law. This legislation clarifies the Board’s authority to apply insurance-based capital standards for insurance companies subject to federal supervision. Although Aflac is a nonbank financial company predominantly engaged in financial activities as defined in the Dodd-Frank Act, we do not believe Aflac will be considered a company that poses a threat to the financial stability of the United States.

25



Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations issued thereunder may have an impact on Aflac's derivative activity, including activity on behalf of Aflac Japan, in particular rules to require central clearing and collateral for certain types of derivatives. In 2014, the five U.S. banking regulators and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) re-proposed for comment their rules regarding collateral for uncleared swaps. Final rules were issued by the five U.S. banking regulators on October 22, 2015 and by the CFTC on December 16, 2015. Such rules may result in increased collateral requirements or affect other aspects of Aflac's derivatives activity.

The Dodd-Frank Act also established an FIO under the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and of lines of business other than certain health insurance, certain long-term care insurance and crop insurance. Traditionally, U.S. insurance companies have been regulated primarily by state insurance departments. In December 2013, the FIO released a report entitled "How To Modernize And Improve The System Of Insurance Regulation In The United States." The report was required by the Dodd-Frank Act, and included 18 recommended areas of near-term reform for the states, including addressing capital adequacy and safety/soundness issues, reform of insurer resolution practices, and reform of marketplace regulation. The report also listed nine recommended areas for direct federal involvement in insurance regulation. Some of the recommendations outlined in the FIO report released in December 2013 have been implemented. Of the nine recommended areas for direct federal involvement in insurance regulation that are applicable to Aflac, the president has signed the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers Reform Act into law in January 2015, which simplifies the agent and broker licensing process across state lines. The FIO has also engaged with the supervisory colleges to monitor financial stability and identify regulatory gaps for large national and internationally active insurers.

The process of implementing the Dodd-Frank Act is ongoing and continues to involve additional rulemaking from time to time. At the current time, it is not possible to predict with any degree of certainty what impact, if any, the Dodd-Frank Act will have on our U.S. business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Changes in domestic or foreign tax laws or interpretations of such laws could increase our corporate taxes and reduce our earnings. Additionally, global budget deficits make it likely that governments’ need for additional revenue will result in future tax proposals that will increase our effective tax rate. However, it remains difficult to predict the timing and effect that future tax law changes could have on our earnings both in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions.
Compliance with applicable laws and regulations is time consuming and personnel-intensive, and changes in these laws and regulations may materially increase our direct and indirect compliance and other expenses of doing business, thus having a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, could harm our business.

We depend heavily on our telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems and on the integrity and timeliness of data we use to run our businesses and service our customers. These systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events or circumstances wholly or partly beyond our control. Despite our implementation of a variety of security measures, our information technology and other systems could be subject to physical or electronic break-ins, unauthorized tampering, security breaches or other cyber-attacks, resulting in a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to customers, or in the misappropriation of our intellectual property or proprietary information. Although the minor data leakage issues we have experienced to date have not had a material effect on our business, interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, whether due to actions by us or others, could delay or disrupt our ability to do business and service our customers, harm our reputation, subject us to regulatory sanctions and other claims, lead to a loss of customers and revenues and otherwise adversely affect our business.


Catastrophic events could adversely affect ourthe Company's financial condition and results of operations.operations as well as the availability of the Company’s infrastructure and systems.


OurThe Company's insurance operations are exposed to the risk of catastrophic events including, but not necessarily limited to, epidemics, pandemics, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, war or other military action, and terrorism or other acts of terrorism.violence. The extent of losses from a catastrophe is a function of both the total amount of insured exposure in the area affected by the event and the severity of the event. Certain events such as earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes and man-made catastrophes could cause substantial damage or loss of life in larger areas, especially those that are heavily populated. Claims resulting from natural or man−made catastrophic events could cause substantial volatility in ourthe Company's financial results for any fiscal quarter or year

26



and could materially reduce ourits profitability or harm ourthe Company's financial condition, as well as affect ourits ability to write new business.


Additionally, the Company's business operations may be adversely affected by such catastrophic events to the extent they disrupt the Company's physical infrastructure and systems that support its businesses and customers. Although the Company has a global crisis management framework to minimize the business disruption from a catastrophic event, such framework may not be effective to avoid an adverse impact to the Company from such an event.


30



Changes in accounting standards issued by the FASBFinancial Accounting Standard Boards (FASB) or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect ourthe Company's financial statements.
OurThe Company's financial statements are subject to the application of generally accepted accounting principles in both the United States and Japan,U.S. GAAP, which areis periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time we arethe Company is required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the FASB. ItThe impact of accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented and are applicable to the Company is possibledisclosed in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The pronouncements expected to have the most significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations are outlined below.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in this update require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured on an amortized cost basis to be presented net of an allowance for credit losses in order to reflect the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset(s). The Company currently expects loans and loan receivables and held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities to be the asset classes most significantly impacted upon adoption of the guidance. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.
Additionally, in August 2018 the FASB issued ASU 2018-12, Financial Services - Insurance, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts. The amendments in this update will significantly change how insurers account for long-duration contracts. Among the issues addressed in the amendments is the requirement to review and, if there is a change, update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits at least annually, and to update the discount rate assumption quarterly. The frequency of the reviews and updates varies according to the assumptions but will be at least annually in all cases. The Company anticipates that the requirement to review and update assumptions for liability for future accounting standards wepolicy benefits will have a significant impact on its results of operations, systems, processes, and controls, while the requirement to update the discount rate will have a significant impact on the other comprehensive income component of its equity. The amendments are required to adopt could change the currenteffective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020.

The accounting treatment that we applythe Company applies to ourits consolidated financial statements will change due to new standards and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's results of operations and financial condition. During the last three years, various accounting standard-setting bodies have been active in soliciting comments and issuing statements, interpretations and exposure drafts. For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on ourthe Company's financial position or results of operations, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Managing key executive succession is critical to our success.
We would be adversely affected if we fail to adequately plan for succession of our senior management and other key executives. While we have succession plans and employment arrangements with certain key executives, these plans cannot guarantee that the services of these executives will be available to us, and our operations could be adversely affected if they are not.
We face risks related to litigation.

We are a defendant in various lawsuits considered to beChanges in the normal course of business. Members of our senior legal and financial management teams review litigation on a quarterly and annual basis. The final results of any litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. Although some of this litigation is pending in states where large punitive damages, bearing little relation to the actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, have been awarded in recent years, we believe the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, litigation could adversely affect us because of the costs of defending these cases, costs of settlement or judgments against us or because of changes in our operations that could result from litigation.
Changes in ourCompany's discount rate, expected rate of return, life expectancy, health care cost and expected compensation increase assumptions for ourits pension and other postretirement benefit plans may result in increased expenses and reduce ourthe Company's profitability.


We determine ourThe Company determines its pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs based on assumed discount rates, expected rates of return on plan assets, life expectancy of plan participants and expected increases in compensation levels and trends in health care costs. Changes in these assumptions, including from the impact of a sustained low interest rate environment, may result in increased expenses and reduce the Company's profitability.

The Company faces risks related to litigation, regulatory investigations and inquiry and other matters.

The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits considered to be in the normal course of business. The final results of any litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and plaintiffs may seek very large amounts in class actions or other litigation. Although some of this litigation is pending in states where large punitive damages, bearing little relation to the actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, have been awarded in recent years, the Company believes the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, a substantial legal liability or a significant federal, state or other regulatory action against us, as well as regulatory inquiries or investigations, could harm our profitability.

We operatereputation, result in an industry that ischanges in operations, result in material fines or penalties, result in significant costs due to legal fees, settlements or judgments against the Company, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Without limiting the foregoing, the litigation and regulatory matters we are, have been, or may become, subject to ongoing changes.
We operateinclude matters related to sales agent recruiting, policy sales practices, claim payments and procedures including denial or delay of benefits, material misstatements or omissions in a competitive environment and in an industry that isour financial reports or other public statements, and/or corporate governance, corporate culture or business ethics matters. Further, the Company may be subject to claims of or litigation regarding sexual or other forms of harassment, or discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, gender, or other bases, notwithstanding that our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics prohibits such harassment and discrimination by our employees, we have ongoing changestraining programs and provide opportunities to report claims of noncompliant conduct, and

31



we investigate and may take disciplinary action regarding alleged harassment or discrimination. Any violations of or deviation from market pressures brought aboutlaws, regulations, internal or external codes or standards of normative behavior, or perceptions of such violations or deviations, by customer demands, legislative reform, marketing practicesour employees or by independent sales agents could adversely impact the Company's reputation and changes to health carebrand value, financial condition and health insurance delivery. These factors require us to anticipate market trendsresults of operations.

Allegations or determinations of agent misclassification could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and make changes to differentiate our products and services from thoseliquidity.

A majority of our competitors. We also faceU.S. sales force is, and has historically been, comprised of independent agents. While we believe that we have properly classified such agents as independent contractors, we may be subject to claims, regulatory action by state or federal departments of labor or tax authorities or litigation asserting that such agents are employees. The laws and regulations governing the potentialclassification of competition from existing or new companiesworkers in the United States and Japanmay be changed or interpreted differently compared to past interpretations, including in states where the Company generates significant sales through independent agents. An allegation or determination that have not historically been activeindependent agents in the supplemental health insurance industry. FailureCompany’s U.S. sales force have been misclassified as independent contractors could result in changes in the Company’s operations and U.S. business model, result in material fines or penalties, result in significant costs due to anticipate market trends and/legal fees, settlements or to differentiate our products and services can affect our ability to retainjudgments against the Company, or grow profitable lines of business.


27



Events, including those external to our operations, could damage our reputation.
Because insurance products are intangible, we rely tootherwise have a large extentmaterial adverse effect on consumer trust in our business. The perception of financial weakness could create doubt regarding our ability to honor the commitments we have made to our policyholders. Maintaining our stature as a responsible corporate citizen, which helps support the strength of our unique brand, is critical to our reputation and the failure or perceived failure to do so could adversely affect us.

We also face other risks that could adversely affect our business, results of operations oroperation, financial condition which include:and liquidity.


any requirement to restate financial results in the event of inappropriate application of accounting principles
failure to appropriately maintain controls over models used to generate significant inputs to the Company’s financial statements
a significant failure of internal controls over financial reporting
failure of our prevention and control systems related to employee compliance with internal policies and regulatory requirements
failure of corporate governance policies and procedures

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


Not applicable.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES


In the United States, Aflac owns land and buildings that comprise two primary campuses located in Columbus, Georgia. These campuses include buildings that serve as ourthe Company's worldwide headquarters and house administrative support and information technology functions for our U.S. operations. Aflac leasesleases office space in Columbia, South Carolina, which houses ourthe Company's CAIC subsidiary.subsidiary (branded as Aflac Group Insurance). Aflac leases office space in New York that houses ourthe Company's Global Investment division. Aflac leases administrative office space in Georgia, South Carolina, New York, Nebraska, and in 39 additional states throughout the United States, as well as Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico.
In Tokyo, Japan, Aflac has three primary campuses. The first campus includes a building, owned by Aflac, for the customer call center, the claims department, information technology departments, and training facility. It also includes a leased property, which houses ourAflac Japan's policy administration and customer service departments. The second campus comprises leased space, which serves as our Japan branchAflac Japan's headquarters and houses administrative and investment support functions for the Japan branch.functions. The third campus comprises leased space for the information technology departments. Aflac also leases additional office space in Tokyo, along with regional offices located throughout the country.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


We areOn December 14, 2017, three former independent sales contractors filed a shareholders derivative complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York naming the Parent Company as nominal defendant and the Parent Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, several of its directors, and a former officer and director as defendants. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duty, misstatements and omissions in the Company’s public disclosures, and insider trading. The Company’s Board of Directors had previously established a special litigation committee (SLC) in July 2017 to investigate certain allegations underlying the derivative action. The SLC issued a report of its investigation in September 2017 and another report in February 2018, each of which determined that it was not in the best interests of the Company to pursue the action demanded by the shareholders. An amended complaint was filed on January 31, 2018. On February 12, 2018, this litigation was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. The SLC issued a third report of its investigation in May 2018 regarding certain additional allegations raised in the amended complaint, in which the SLC also determined that it was not in the best interests of the Company to pursue the action demanded by the shareholders. On August 31, 2018, the District Court granted the Company's motion and the amended complaint was dismissed. The plaintiffs have appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The Company believes the outcome of this litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

32


Item 3. Legal Proceedings


The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits considered to be in the normal course of business. Members of ourthe Company's senior legal and financial management teams review litigation on a quarterly and annual basis. The final results of any litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. Although some of this litigation is pending in states where large punitive damages, bearing little relation to the actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, have been awarded in recent years, we believethe Company believes the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on ourits financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.


ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.




2833




Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information

Aflac Incorporated's common stock is principally traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol AFL. OurAflac Incorporated's stock is also listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The quarterly high and low market prices forExchange under designator 8686.

Stock Split

On February 13, 2018, the Company'sBoard of Directors of the Parent Company declared a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock as reported onin the New York Stock Exchange for the two years ended December 31 were as follows:
Quarterly Common Stock Prices
2015High Low
4th Quarter $66.53
   $56.78
 
3rd Quarter 64.99
   51.41
 
2nd Quarter 65.10
   61.32
 
1st Quarter 64.62
   56.41
 
2014High Low
4th Quarter $62.46
   $54.99
 
3rd Quarter 64.20
   57.70
 
2nd Quarter 64.47
   60.60
 
1st Quarter 66.69
   60.45
 

Holders

Asform of February 16, 2016, there were 87,482 holders of record of the Company's common stock.
Dividends
 2015 2014
4th Quarter $.41
   $.39
 
3rd Quarter .39
   .37
 
2nd Quarter .39
   .37
 
1st Quarter .39
   .37
 

In February2016, the board of directors declared the first quarter 2016 casha 100% stock dividend of $.41 per share. The dividend is payable on March 1, 201616, 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 16, 2016.March 2, 2018. The declaration and paymentstock split was payable in the form of future dividends to holders of ourone additional common stock will be atshare for every share of common stock held. All equity and share-based data, including the discretionnumber of our board of directorsshares outstanding and will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements of our operating subsidiaries, legal requirements, regulatory constraints and other factors asper share amounts, have been adjusted to reflect the board of directors deems relevant. There can be no assurance that we will declare and pay any additional or future dividends. For information concerning dividend restrictions, see Regulatory Restrictions in the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of MD&A and Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statementsstock split for all periods presented in this report.Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Holders

As of February 12, 2019, there were 86,621 holders of record of the Company's common stock.

2934




Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the five-year performance of the Company's common stock to the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) and the Standard & Poor's Life and Health Insurance Index (S&P Life and Health). The Standard & Poor's Life and Health Insurance Index includes: Aflac Incorporated, Brighthouse Financial Inc., Lincoln National Corporation, MetLife Inc., Principal Financial Group Inc., Prudential Financial Inc., Torchmark Corporation and Unum Group.


totalreturngrapha02.jpg



Performance Graphic Index
December 31,
2010
 2011
 2012
 2013
 2014
 2015
2013
 2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
 2018
Aflac Incorporated100.00
 78.69
 99.43
 128.18
 120.13
 120.75
100.00
 93.72
 94.20
 112.20
 144.74
 153.73
S&P 500100.00
 102.11
 118.45
 156.82
 178.29
 180.75
100.00
 113.69
 115.26
 129.05
 157.22
 150.33
S&P Life & Health Insurance100.00
 79.29
 90.86
 148.53
 151.43
 141.87
100.00
 101.95
 95.51
 119.26
 138.85
 110.01
Copyright© 2016 2019 Standard & Poor’s, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.S&P Global. All rights reserved. (www.researchdatagroup.com/S&P.htm)


3035




Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the year ended December 31, 20152018, we repurchased shares of Aflac common stock as follows:
PeriodTotal
Number of
Shares
Purchased
 Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
 Maximum    
Number of    
Shares that    
May Yet Be    
Purchased    
Under the    
Plans or    
Programs    
 Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
 Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
 Maximum    
Number of    
Shares that    
May Yet Be    
Purchased    
Under the    
Plans or    
Programs    
 
January 1 - January 31 3,326,084
 $58.64
 3,325,300
 26,224,824
  2,370,284
 $44.31
 2,370,284
 95,626,488
 
February 1 - February 28 2,457,596
 61.41
 2,301,000
 23,923,824
  2,349,600
 44.70
 2,349,600
 93,276,888
 
March 1 - March 31 4,205,408
 62.82
 4,201,000
 19,722,824
  1,937,161
 44.49
 1,920,400
 91,356,488
 
April 1 - April 30 325,000
 63.74
 325,000
 19,397,824
  2,082,500
 44.62
 2,082,500
 89,273,988
 
May 1 - May 31 1,990,000
 63.07
 1,990,000
 17,407,824
  2,558,472
 45.17
 2,542,900
 86,731,088
 
June 1 - June 30 1,398,960
 62.44
 1,391,700
 16,016,124
  2,175,100
 44.99
 2,175,100
 84,555,988
 
July 1 - July 31 110,745
 64.15
 110,000
 15,906,124
  2,008,123
 43.52
 1,994,900
 82,561,088
 
August 1 - August 31 2,368,500
 61.24
 2,368,500
 53,537,624
  2,358,317
 46.64
 2,352,500
 80,208,588
 
September 1 - September 30 1,410,706
 57.52
 1,408,300
 52,129,324
  2,668,990
 47.20
 2,654,401
 77,554,187
 
October 1 - October 31 1,275,200
 61.20
 1,275,200
 50,854,124
  2,817,600
 44.78
 2,817,600
 74,736,587
 
November 1 - November 30 1,210,100
 64.49
 1,210,100
 49,644,024
  2,337,607
 44.44
 2,336,400
 72,400,187
 
December 1 - December 31 1,277,395
 61.32
 1,272,466
 48,371,558
   3,382,043
 44.03
 3,352,300
 69,047,887
  
Total 21,355,694
 
(2) 
 $61.41
 21,178,566
 48,371,558
 
(1) 
 29,045,797
 
(1) 
 $44.93
 28,948,885
 69,047,887
 
(1)The total remaining shares available for purchase at December 31, 2015, consisted of: (1) 8,371,558 shares related to a share repurchase authorization by the board of directors announced in 2013 and (2) 40,000,000 shares related to a share repurchase authorization by the board of directors announced in August 2015.
(2)During the year ended December 31, 2015, 177,1282018, 96,912 shares were purchased in connection with income tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of restricted-share-based awards during the period.



As of December 31, 2018, a remaining balance of 69.0 million shares of the Company's common stock was available for purchase under share repurchase authorizations by its Board of Directors.

3136




Item 6. Selected Financial Data

ITEM 6.     SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years Ended December 31,
 
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Revenues:                  
Net premiums, principally supplemental
health insurance
$17,570
 $19,072
 $20,135
 $22,148
 $20,362
$18,677
 $18,531
 $19,225
 $17,570
 $19,072
Net investment income3,135
 3,319
 3,293
 3,473
 3,280
3,442
 3,220
 3,278
 3,135
 3,319
Realized investment gains (losses)140
 215
 399
 (349) (1,552)(430) (151) (14) 106
 282
Other income27
 122
 112
 92
 81
69
 67
 70
 61
 55
Total revenues20,872
 22,728
 23,939
 25,364
 22,171
21,758
 21,667
 22,559
 20,872
 22,728
Benefits and expenses:                  
Benefits and claims, net11,746
 12,937
 13,813
 15,330
 13,749
12,000
 12,181
 12,919
 11,746
 12,937
Expenses5,264
 5,300
 5,310
 5,732
 5,472
5,775
 5,468
 5,573
 5,264
 5,300
Total benefits and expenses17,010
 18,237
 19,123
 21,062
 19,221
17,775
 17,649
 18,492
 17,010
 18,237
Pretax earnings3,862
 4,491
 4,816
 4,302
 2,950
3,983
 4,018
 4,067
 3,862
 4,491
Income taxes1,329
 1,540
 1,658
 1,436
 1,013
1,063
 (586) 1,408
 1,329
 1,540
Net earnings$2,533
 $2,951
 $3,158
 $2,866
 $1,937
$2,920
 $4,604
 $2,659
 $2,533
 $2,951
Share and Per-Share Amounts                  
Net earnings (basic)$5.88
 $6.54
 $6.80
 $6.14
 $4.16
$3.79
 $5.81
 $3.23
 $2.94
 $3.27
Net earnings (diluted)5.85
 6.50
 6.76
 6.11
 4.12
3.77
 5.77
 3.21
 2.92
 3.25
Cash dividends paid1.58
 1.50
 1.42
 1.34
 1.23
1.04
 .87
 .83
 .79
 .75
Cash dividends declared1.58
 1.50
 1.42
 1.34
 1.23
1.04
 .87
 .83
 .79
 .75
Weighted-average common shares used for basic
EPS (In thousands)
430,654
 451,204
 464,502
 466,868
 466,519
769,588
 792,042
 822,942
 861,307
 902,408
Weighted-average common shares used for diluted
EPS (In thousands)
433,172
 454,000
 467,408
 469,287
 469,370
774,650
 797,861
 827,841
 866,344
 907,999
Supplemental Data                  
Yen/dollar exchange rate at year-end (yen)120.61
 120.55
 105.39
 86.58
 77.74
111.00
 113.00
 116.49
 120.61
 120.55
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate (yen)120.99
 105.46
 97.54
 79.81
 79.75
110.39
 112.16
 108.70
 120.99
 105.46
Amounts prior to 2012Prior-year amounts have been adjusted for the two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock in March 2018.


37


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
December 31,
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Assets:         
Investments and cash$126,243
 $123,659
 $116,361
 $105,897
 $107,341
Other14,163
 13,558
 13,458
 12,359
 12,386
Total assets$140,406
 $137,217
 $129,819
 $118,256
 $119,727
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:         
Policy liabilities$103,188
 $99,147
 $93,726
 $87,631
 $83,933
Income taxes4,020
 4,745
 5,387
 4,340
 5,293
Notes payable5,778
 5,289
 5,360
 4,971
 5,242
Other liabilities3,958
 3,438
 4,864
 3,606
 6,912
Shareholders’ equity23,462
 24,598
 20,482
 17,708
 18,347
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$140,406
 $137,217
 $129,819
 $118,256
 $119,727
Prior-year amounts have been adjusted for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 20122016 related to deferred policy acquisitiondebt issuance costs.






3238




Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
December 31,
(In millions)2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
Assets:         
Investments and cash$105,897
 $107,341
 $108,459
 $118,219
 $103,462
Other12,399
 12,426
 12,848
 12,875
 12,775
Total assets$118,296
 $119,767
 $121,307
 $131,094
 $116,237
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:         
Policy liabilities$87,631
 $83,933
 $89,402
 $97,720
 $94,239
Income taxes4,340
 5,293
 3,718
 3,858
 2,308
Notes payable5,011
 5,282
 4,897
 4,352
 3,285
Other liabilities3,606
 6,912
 8,670
 9,186
 3,459
Shareholders’ equity17,708
 18,347
 14,620
 15,978
 12,946
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$118,296
 $119,767
 $121,307
 $131,094
 $116,237

Amounts prior to 2012 have been adjusted for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2012 related to deferred policy acquisition costs.


33



ITEM 7.     MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
                              
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION


The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” to encourage companies to provide prospective information, so long as those informational statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. We desireThe Company desires to take advantage of these provisions. This report contains cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected herein, and in any other statements made by Company officials in communications with the financial community and contained in documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Forward-looking statements are not based on historical information and relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Furthermore, forward-looking information is subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. In particular, statements containing words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “goal,” “objective,” “may,” “should,” “estimate,” “intends,” “projects,” “will,” “assumes,” “potential,” “target”the following or similar words as well as specific projections of future results, generally qualify as forward-looking. Aflac undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.

We caution
• expect• anticipate• believe• goal• objective
• may• should• estimate• intends• projects
• will• assumes• potential• target• outlook

The Company cautions readers that the following factors, in addition to other factors mentioned from time to time, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements:


difficult conditions in global capital markets and the economy
governmental actions for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets
defaults and credit downgrades of securities in our investment portfolio
exposure to significant interest rate risk
concentration of business in Japan
limited availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments
failure to comply with restrictions on patient privacy and information security
foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate
limited availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments
U.S. tax audit risk related to conversion of the Japan branch to a subsidiary
deviations in actual experience from pricing and reserving assumptions
subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends to Aflac Incorporated
ability to continue to develop and implement improvements in information technology systems
concentration of our investments in any particular single-issuer or sectorcompetitive environment and ability to anticipate and respond to market trends
decline in creditworthiness of other financial institutionsability to protect the Aflac brand and the Company's reputation
ability to attract and retain qualified sales associates, brokers, employees, and employees
differing judgments applied to investment valuations
significant valuation judgments in determination of amount of impairments taken on our investments
credit and other risks associated with Aflac's investment in perpetual securities
decreases in our financial strength or debt ratings
inherent limitations to risk management policies and procedures
extensive regulation and changes in law or regulation by governmental authoritiesdistribution partners
interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems
failure to comply with restrictions on patient privacy and information security
extensive regulation and changes in law or regulation by governmental authorities
tax rates applicable to the Company may change
defaults and credit downgrades of investments
decline in creditworthiness of other financial institutions
significant valuation judgments in determination of amount of impairments taken on the Company's investments
subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends to the Parent Company
decreases in the Company's financial strength or debt ratings
inherent limitations to risk management policies and procedures
concentration of the Company's investments in any particular single-issuer or sector
differing judgments applied to investment valuations
ability to effectively manage key executive succession
catastrophic events including, but not necessarily limited to, epidemics, pandemics, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, war or other military action, terrorism or other acts of terrorismviolence, and damage incidental to such events
changes in U.S. and/or Japanese accounting standards
ability to effectively manage key executive succession
level and outcome of litigation
increased expenses and reduced profitability resulting from changes in assumptions for pension and other postretirement benefit plans
ongoing changeslevel and outcome of litigation
allegations or determinations of worker misclassification in our industrythe United States
loss of consumer trust resulting from events external to our operations
failure of internal controls or corporate governance policies and procedures



39


34





MD&A OVERVIEW


Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to inform the reader about matters affecting the financial condition and results of operations of Aflac Incorporated and its subsidiaries for the three-year period ended December 31, 2015.2018. As a result, the following discussion should be read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements and notes. This MD&A is divided into the following sections:

Performance Highlights
Critical Accounting Estimates
Results of Operations, consolidated and by segment
Analysis of Financial Condition, including discussion of market risks of financial instruments
Capital Resources and Liquidity, including discussion of availability of capital and the sources and uses of cash

OURTHE COMPANY'S BUSINESS


Aflac Incorporated (the Parent Company) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) primarily sell supplemental health and life insurance in the United States and Japan. The Company's insurance business is marketed and administered through American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (Aflac), which operates in the United States (Aflac U.S.) and, as a brancheffective April 1, 2018, through Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. in Japan (Aflac Japan). Prior to April 1, 2018, the Company's insurance business was marketed in Japan as a branch of Aflac. (For more information about the conversion of Aflac Japan to a legal subsidiary, see the Insurance Operations subsection of this MD&A). American Family Life Assurance Company of New York (Aflac New York) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Aflac. Most of Aflac's policies are individually underwritten and marketed through independent agents. Additionally, Aflac U.S. also markets and administers group products through Continental American Insurance Company (CAIC), branded as Aflac Group Insurance. OurThe Company's insurance operations in the United States and our branch in Japan service the two markets for ourthe Company's insurance business.


For more information on the Company's business, see Business, Part I, Item 1 of this report.

PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS


Yen-denominated income statement accounts are translated to U.S. dollars using a weighted-average Japanese yen/U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate, while yen-denominated balance sheet accounts are translated to U.S. dollars using a spot Japanese yen/U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate.rate(1). The spot yen/dollar exchange rate at December 31, 20152018 was 120.61,111.00, or .05% weaker1.8% stronger than the December 31, 2014 spot yen/dollar exchange rate of 120.55.113.00 at December 31, 2017. The weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 20152018 was 120.99,110.39, or 12.8% weaker1.6% stronger than the weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate of 105.46112.16 for the same period in 2014.2017.


Reflecting the weaker yen/dollar exchange rate, totalTotal revenues decreased 8.2%increased .4% to $20.9$21.8 billion in 2015,2018, compared with $22.7$21.7 billion in 2014.2017. Net earnings in 20152018 were $2.5$2.9 billion,, or $5.85$3.77per diluted share, compared with $3.0$4.6 billion,, or $6.50$5.77 per diluted share, in 2014.2017. In 2017, net earnings and net earnings per diluted share included the impact of the estimated $1.9 billion, or $2.42 per diluted share, benefit as a result of the U.S. Tax Act. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability.


Results for 20152018 included pretax net realized investment gainslosses of $140$430 million, ($91 million after-tax), compared with net realized investment gainslosses of $215$151 million ($140 million after-tax) in 2014.2017. Net investment gainslosses in 2015 consisted of $3032018 included $81 million of net gains ($197 million after-tax) from the sale or redemption of securities; $153 million ($100 million after-tax) of other-than-temporary impairment losses;losses and $10changes in loan loss reserves and $234 million of in net losses ($7from derivatives and foreign currency gains or losses. Effective January 1, 2018 upon the adoption of new accounting guidance, changes in fair value of equity securities are recorded in earnings as a component of realized investment gains and losses. The Company reported net losses on equity securities of $131 million after-tax) from valuing derivatives.in 2018.


Shareholders' equity included a net unrealized gain
(1) Yen/ U.S dollar exchange rates are based on investment securitiesthe published MUFG Bank, Ltd. telegraphic transfer middle rate (TTM)

40




In August 2015, we paid off $300 million of 3.45% fixed-rate senior notes upon their maturity. In August 2015, we paid off a 5.0 billion yen loan at its maturity date (a total of approximately $41 million using the exchange rate at the maturity date). In July 2015, we paid off a 10.0 billion yen loan at its maturity date (a total of approximately $81 million using the exchange rate at the maturity date). In March 2015,October 2018, the Parent Company issued $1.0$550 million of senior notes and 53.4 billion yen of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. We entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to economically convert theofferings under its U.S. dollar denominated principal and interest on the senior notes we issued into yen-denominated obligations.shelf registration statement. In April 2015,November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds fromof the March 2015 issuance of our fixed-rate$550 million senior notes to redeem all of its $850 million 8.50% fixed-ratethe Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due May 2019 and to pay a portion of the corresponding $230 million make-whole premium due to the investors of these notes.


35




In October 2015, the Parent Company and Aflac jointly entered into a 364-day uncommitted bilateral line of credit that provides for borrowings in the amount of $100 million. In September 2015, the Parent Company and Aflac amended a 50 billion yen revolving credit facility, resulting in jointly entering into an unsecured revolving credit facility agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for borrowings in the amount of 55 billion yen. In February 2015, the Parent Company and Aflac jointly entered into an uncommitted bilateral line of credit with a third party that provides for borrowings in the amount of $50 million.2020. For further information regarding these transactions, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of this MD&A.


WeOn February 13, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Parent Company declared a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend payable on March 16, 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 2, 2018. The stock split was paid in the form of one additional common stock share for every share of common stock held. All equity and share-based data, including the number of shares outstanding and per share amounts, have been adjusted to reflect the stock split for all periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company repurchased 21.228.9 million shares of ourits common stock in the open market for $1.3 billion under ourits share repurchase program in 2015,2018, compared with 19.7the repurchase of 35.5 million shares repurchasedfor $1.35 billion in 2014.2017.


Strategic Alliance with Japan Post Holdings

On December 19, 2018, the Parent Company and Aflac Japan entered into the Basic Agreement with Japan Post Holdings. Pursuant to the terms of the Basic Agreement, Japan Post Holdings agreed to form a capital relationship with the Parent Company, and Japan Post Holdings and Aflac Japan agreed to reconfirm existing initiatives regarding cancer insurance and to consider new joint initiatives, including leveraging digital technology in various processes, cooperation in new product development to promote customer-centric business management, cooperation in domestic and/or overseas business expansion and joint investment in third party entities and cooperation regarding asset management.

Pursuant to the terms of the Shareholders Agreement a voting trust established and funded by Japan Post Holdings (Trust) will use commercially reasonable efforts to acquire, through open market or private block purchases, ownership of approximately 7% of the outstanding shares of the Parent Company’s outstanding common stock within a year after the Trust begins acquiring such stock. The Trust has agreed not to own more than 10% of the Parent Company’s outstanding shares for a period expiring on the earlier of four years after the Trust acquires 7% of such shares, five years after it acquires 5% of such shares, or ten years after the Trust begins acquiring the Parent Company’s stock. After expiration of such period, the Trust has agreed not to own more than the greater of 10% of the Parent Company’s outstanding shares or such shares representing 22.5% of the voting rights in the Parent Company.

In light of the fact that the shares acquired by the Trust, like all Aflac Incorporated common shares, will be eligible for 10-for-1 voting rights after being held for 48 consecutive months, the Shareholders Agreement further provides for voting restrictions that effectively limit the trustee’s voting rights to no more than 20% of the voting rights in the Parent Company and further restrict the trustee’s voting rights with respect to certain change in control transactions. Japan Post Holdings will not have a Board seat on the Parent Company’s Board of Directors and will not have rights to control, manage or intervene in the management of the Parent Company.

This strategic investment is subject to certain regulatory approvals in Japan and the U.S. The Company anticipates that regulatory approvals will be received in the second half of 2019.

The foregoing summary is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Basic Agreement and Letter Agreement, including the forms of Trust Agreement and Shareholders Agreement attached to the Letter Agreement, copies of which are included as Exhibits 10.47 and 10.48 hereto and the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference.

As of December 31, 2018, the Trust owned no shares of the Parent Company’s outstanding stock.



41



CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES


We prepare ourThe Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).GAAP. These principles are established primarily by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).FASB. In this MD&A, references to U.S. GAAP issued by the FASB are derived from the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (ASC). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires usthe Company to make estimates based on currently available information when recording transactions resulting from business operations. The estimates that we deemthe Company deems to be most critical to an understanding of Aflac's results of operations and financial condition are those related to the valuation of investments and derivatives, deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC), liabilities for future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims, and income taxes. The preparation and evaluation of these critical accounting estimates involve the use of various assumptions developed from management's analyses and judgments. The application of these critical accounting estimates determines the values at which 93%94% of ourthe Company's assets and 77%81% of ourits liabilities are reported as of December 31, 2015,2018, and thus has a direct effect on net earnings and shareholders' equity. Subsequent experience or use of other assumptions could produce significantly different results.


Investments and Derivatives


Aflac's investments, primarily consisting of debt perpetual and equity securities, include both publicly issued and privately issued securities. For publicly issued securities, we determinethe Company determines the fair values from quoted market prices readily available from public exchange markets and price quotes and valuations from third party pricing vendors. For the majority of privately issued securities within ourthe Company's investment portfolio, a third party pricing vendor has developed valuation models that the Company utilizes to determine fair values. For the remaining privately issued securities, we usethe Company uses non-binding price quotes from outside brokers. We

The Company estimates the fair values of its securities on a monthly basis. The Company monitors the estimated fair values obtained from its pricing vendors and brokers for consistency from month to month, while considering current market conditions. The Company also periodically discusses with its pricing brokers and vendors the pricing techniques they use to monitor the consistency of their approach and periodically assess the appropriateness of the valuation level assigned to the values obtained from them. If a fair value appears unreasonable, the Company will re-examine the inputs and assess the reasonableness of the pricing data with the vendor. Additionally, the Company may compare the inputs to relevant market indices and other performance measurements. Based on management's analysis, the valuation is confirmed or may be revised if there is evidence of a more appropriate estimate of fair value based on available market data. The Company has performed verification of the inputs and calculations in any valuation models to confirm that the valuations represent reasonable estimates of fair value.

The Company also routinely review ourreviews its investments that have experienced declines in fair value to determine if the decline is other than temporary. The identification of distressed investments, the determination of fair value if not publicly traded and the assessment of whether a decline is other than temporary involve significant management judgment.

We The Company must apply considerable judgment in determining the likelihood of the security recovering in value while we ownthe Company owns it. Factors that may influence this include ourthe Company's assessment of the issuer’s ability to continue making timely payments of interest and principal, the overall level of interest rates and credit spreads, and other factors. This process requires consideration of risks, which can be controlled to a certain extent, such as credit risk, and risks which cannot be controlled, such as interest rate risk. Management updates its evaluations regularly and reflects impairment losses in the Company's net earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on the nature of the loss, as such evaluations are revised.


OurThe Company's derivative activities include foreign currency, interest rate and credit default swaps in VIEs that are consolidated; foreign currency swaps associated with certain senior notes and our subordinated debentures; foreign currency forwards and options used in hedging foreign exchange risk and interest rate swaps and options on interest rate swaps (or interest rate swaptions) used in hedging interest rate risk on U.S. dollar-denominated securities in Aflac Japan's portfolio; and foreign currency forwards and options used to economically hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in yen.yen and hedge the Company's long term exposure to a weakening yen; foreign currency swaps associated with certain senior notes and subordinated debentures; and foreign currency and credit default swaps in variable interest entities (VIEs) that are consolidated. Inputs used to value derivatives include, but are not limited to, interest rates, credit spreads, foreign currency forward and spot rates, and interest volatility. With the exception of the derivatives associated with our VIE investments, the fair values of the derivatives referenced above are based on the amounts we would expect to receive or pay to terminate the derivatives. For derivatives associated with VIEs where we are the primary beneficiary, we receive valuations from a third party pricing vendor.


See Notes 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.



36



Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Policy Liabilities


Aflac's productsInsurance premiums for most of the Company's health and life policies, including cancer, accident, hospital, critical illness, dental, vision, term life, whole life, long-term care and disability, are generally long-duration fixed-benefit indemnity contracts. We make estimatesrecognized as revenue over the premium-

42



paying periods of the contracts when due from policyholders. When revenues are reported, the related amounts of benefits and expenses are charged against such revenues, so that affectprofits are recognized in proportion to premium revenues during the profitabilityperiod the policies are expected to remain in force. This association is accomplished by means of our businessannual additions to match expectedthe liability for future policy benefits and deferrable acquisition costs with expected policy premiums. These factors include persistency, morbidity, mortality, investment yields and expenses. If actual results match the assumptions used in establishing policy liabilities and the deferral and subsequent amortization of policy acquisition costs,costs.

Premiums from the Company's products with limited-pay features, including term life, whole life, WAYS, and child endowment, are collected over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided. Premiums for these products are recognized as revenue over the premium-paying periods of the contracts when due from policyholders. Any gross premium in excess of the net premium is deferred and recorded in earnings, such that profits are expected to emerge ratably overrecognized in a constant relationship with insurance in force. Benefits are recorded as an expense when they are incurred. A liability for future policy benefits is recorded when premiums are recognized using the life of the policy. However, because actual results will vary from the assumptions, profits as a percentage of earned premiums will vary from year to year.net premium method.

We measure the adequacy of our policy reserves and recoverability of DAC annually by performing gross premium valuations on our business. Our testing indicates that our insurance liabilities are adequate and that our DAC is recoverable.


Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs


Certain costs of acquiring new business are deferred and amortized over the policy's premium payment period in proportion to anticipated premium income. Future amortizationThe calculation of DAC isand the liability for future policy benefits requires the use of estimates based upon our estimateson sound actuarial valuation techniques. For new policy issues, the Company reviews its actuarial assumptions and deferrable acquisition costs each year and revise them when necessary to more closely reflect recent experience and studies of persistency, interestactual acquisition costs. For policies in force, the Company evaluates DAC by major product groupings to determine that they are recoverable from future revenues, and future premium revenue generally established at the time of policy issuance. However, the unamortized balance of DAC reflects actual persistency.any amounts determined not to be recoverable are charged against net earnings. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the DAC activity for the past two years.


Policy Liabilities


The following table provides details of policy liabilities by segment and in total as of December 31.
Policy Liabilities
(In millions)2015 20142018 2017
Japan segment:      
Future policy benefits$62,244
 $57,916
$77,812
 $73,661
Unpaid policy claims2,193
 2,120
2,857
 2,692
Other policy liabilities14,023
 14,539
12,122
 12,779
Total Japan policy liabilities$78,460
 $74,575
$92,791
 $89,132
U.S. segment:      
Future policy benefits$8,087
 $7,728
$9,137
 $8,806
Unpaid policy claims1,609
 1,511
1,727
 1,700
Other policy liabilities119
 117
117
 119
Total U.S. policy liabilities$9,815
 $9,356
$10,981
 $10,625
Consolidated:      
Future policy benefits$69,687
 $65,646
$86,368
 $81,857
Unpaid policy claims3,802
 3,630
4,584
 4,392
Other policy liabilities14,142
 14,657
12,236
 12,898
Total consolidated policy liabilities(1)$87,631
(1) 
$83,933
$103,188
 $99,147
(1) The sum of the Japan and U.S. segments exceeds the total due to reinsurance and retrocession activity.


OurThe Company's policy liabilities, which are determined in accordance with applicable guidelines as defined under U.S. GAAP and Actuarial Standards of Practice, include two components that involve analysis and judgment: future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims, which accounted for 80%84% and 4% of total policy liabilities as of December 31, 20152018, respectively.


Future policy benefits provide for claims that will occur in the future and are generally calculated as the present value of future expected benefits to be incurred less the present value of future expected net benefit premiums. We calculateThe Company calculates future policy benefits based on assumptions of morbidity, mortality, persistency and interest. These assumptions are generally established at the time a policy is issued. The assumptions used in the calculations are closely

43



related to those used in developing the gross premiums for a policy. As required by U.S. GAAP, wethe Company also includeincludes a provision for adverse deviation, which is intended to accommodate adverse fluctuations in actual experience.



37



Unpaid policy claims include those claims that have been incurred and are in the process of payment as well as an estimate of those claims that have been incurred but have not yet been reported to us. We computethe Company. The Company computes unpaid policy claims on a non-discounted basis using statistical analyses of historical claims payments, adjusted for current trends and changed conditions. We updateThe Company updates the assumptions underlying the estimate of unpaid policy claims regularly and incorporate ourincorporates its historical experience as well as other data that provides information regarding ourthe Company's outstanding liability.


OurThe Company's insurance products provide fixed-benefit amounts per occurrence that are not subject to medical-cost inflation. Furthermore, ourthe Company's business is widely dispersed in both the United States and Japan. This geographic dispersion and the nature of ourthe Company's benefit structure mitigate the risk of a significant unexpected increase in claims payments due to epidemics and events of a catastrophic nature. Claims incurred under Aflac's policies are generally reported and paid in a relatively short time frame. The unpaid claims liability is sensitive to morbidity assumptions, in particular, severity and frequency of claims. Severity is the ultimate size of a claim, and frequency is the number of claims incurred. OurThe Company's claims experience is primarily related to the demographics of ourits policyholders.


As a part of ourits established financial reporting and accounting practices and controls, we performthe Company performs detailed annual actuarial reviews of ourits policyholder liabilities (gross premium valuation, GPV, analysis) and reflectreflects the results of those reviews in ourits results of operations and financial condition as required by U.S. GAAP. For Aflac Japan, ourthe Company's annual review in 20152016 indicated that weit needed to strengthen the liability associated with a block of care policies, primarily due to low investment yields. WeThe Company strengthened ourits future policy benefits liability by $18$52 million in 20152016 as a result of this review. OurResults of the Company’s annual review in 20142018 and 2013 indicated2017 concluded that no need to strengthen liabilities associated with policies in Japan.further strengthening was required for these liabilities. For Aflac U.S., ourthe Company's annual reviews in 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 indicated no need to strengthen liabilities associated with policies in the United States. Our reviewIn the U.S. and Japan, investment assumptions were reviewed in 2013 indicated that we needed2017 and the Company adopted expected forward rates in its GPV yield projections. In addition, in Japan, assets were allocated to strengthenblocks of business to align with yield and duration requirements of the liability associated primarily with long-term care in the United States. We strengthened our future policy benefits liability by $20 million in 2013 as a result of this review.businesses.


The table below reflects the growth of the future policy benefits liability for the years ended December 31.
Future Policy Benefits
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Aflac U.S.$8,087
 $7,728
 $7,354
 $9,137
 $8,806
 $8,442
 
Growth rate4.6%
5.1 %
6.1 %
3.8%
4.3%
4.4%
Aflac Japan$62,244
 $57,916
 $61,780
 $77,812
 $73,661
 $68,291
 
Growth rate7.5%
(6.3)%
(11.1)%
5.6%
7.9%
9.7%
Consolidated$69,687
 $65,646
 $69,136
 $86,368
 $81,857
 $76,106
 
Growth rate6.2%
(5.0)%
(9.6)%
5.5%
7.6%
9.2%
Yen/dollar exchange rate (end of period)120.61
 120.55
 105.39
 111.00
 113.00
 116.49
 
Aflac Japan (in yen)7,507
 6,982
 6,511
 8,637
 8,324
 7,955
 
Growth rate7.5%
7.2 %
8.2 %
3.8%
4.6%
6.0%


The growth of the future policy benefits liability in yen for Aflac Japan and in dollars for Aflac U.S. has been due to the aging of ourthe Company's in-force block of business and the addition of new business.


In computing the estimate of unpaid policy claims, we considerthe Company considers many factors, including the benefits and amounts available under the policy; the volume and demographics of the policies exposed to claims; and internal business practices, such as incurred date assignment and current claim administrative practices. We monitorThe Company monitors these conditions closely and make adjustments to the liability as actual experience emerges. Claim levels are generally stable from period to period; however, fluctuations in claim levels may occur. In calculating the unpaid policy claim liability, we dothe Company does not calculate a range of estimates. The following table shows the expected sensitivity of the unpaid policy claims liability as of December 31, 2015,2018, to changes in severity and frequency of claims.



44


38





Sensitivity of Unpaid Policy Claims Liability
(In millions) Total Severity  Total Severity 
Total FrequencyDecrease
by 2%
 Decrease
by 1%
 Unchanged Increase
by 1%
 Increase
by 2%
Decrease
by 2%
 Decrease
by 1%
 Unchanged Increase
by 1%
 Increase
by 2%
Increase by 2% $0
 $22
 $44
 $66
 $88
  $0
 $25
 $50
 $75
 $101
 
Increase by 1% (21) 0
 22
 44
 66
  (24) 0
 25
 50
 75
 
Unchanged (43) (22) 0
 22
 44
  (49) (25) 0
 25
 50
 
Decrease by 1% (64) (43) (22) 0
 22
  (73) (49) (25) 0
 25
 
Decrease by 2% (85) (64) (43) (21) 0
  (97) (73) (49) (24) 0
 


Other policy liabilities, which accounted for 16%12% of total policy liabilities as of December 31, 2015,2018, consisted primarily of annuity and unearned premium reserves, and discounted advance premiums on deposit from policyholders in conjunction with their purchase of certain Aflac Japan insurance products. These advanced premiums are deferred upon collection and recognized as premium revenue over the contractual premium payment period. Advanced premiums represented 43%29% and 47%34% of the December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 other policy liabilities balances, respectively. See the Aflac Japan segment subsection of this MD&A for further information.


Income Taxes


Income tax provisions are generally based on pretax earnings reported for financial statement purposes, which differ from those amounts used in preparing ourthe Company's income tax returns. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which we expectthe Company expects the temporary differences to reverse. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with U.S. GAAP is a two-step process. Under the first step, the enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The second step is measurement, whereby a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that an amount will not be realized. The determination of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets requires management to make certain judgments and assumptions.


In evaluating the ability to recover deferred tax assets, ourthe Company's management considers all available evidence, including taxable income in open carry back years, the existence of cumulative losses in the most recent years, forecasted earnings, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, future taxable temporary difference reversals, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In the event we determinethe Company determines it is not more likely than not that weit will be able to realize all or part of ourits deferred tax assets in the future, a valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Likewise, if it is later determined that it is more likely than not that those deferred tax assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed. Future economic conditions and market volatility, including increases in interest rates or widening credit spreads, can adversely impact the Company’s tax planning strategies and in particular the Company’s ability to utilize tax benefits on previously recognized capital losses. OurThe Company's judgments and assumptions are subject to change given the inherent uncertainty in predicting future performance and specific industry and investment market conditions.


Interest ratesThe Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, effective January 1, 2018 the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated or reduced certain deductions and credit spreadscredits, and limited the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation.

The Tax Act also transitions international corporate taxation from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system, which in bothlight of the United Statescurrent tax treatment of Aflac Japan has the effect of subjecting the earnings of Aflac Japan to Japan taxation and Japan are not the only factors that impactsubjecting the Company’s unrealized gain/loss position andother earnings, including the evaluationconsolidated earnings of a needthe Parent Company, to U.S. taxation.

These changes became effective on January 1, 2018. Because changes to tax rates are accounted for a valuation allowance onin the Company’s deferred tax asset, but they do have a direct and significant effect on both. Based on our methodology described above for evaluatingperiod of enactment, during the need for a valuation allowance, we have determined that it is more likely than not that ourperiod ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets will be realizedand liabilities and recorded, as its reasonable estimate, a net deferred tax liability reduction of $1.9 billion as of that date. While the Company believes that this estimate was reasonable, it is relying upon guidance provided by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118) that provided a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date of December 22, 2017, in order to complete the accounting for the effects of the Tax Act. This estimate was subject to new and

45


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

changing regulations, interpretations and tax guidance in the future, therefore we have notas well as further refinement of the Company’s calculations and changes in the interpretations and assumptions that the Company had made. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded aan immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance as of December 31, 2015.adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability.

SeeFor additional information on income tax, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this report.

Future Adoption of Accounting Standard for additional information.Long-Duration Insurance Contracts


In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-12, “Financial Services - Insurance, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts.” The update, which is expected to significantly change how insurers account for long-duration contracts, amends existing recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements applicable to the Company. Issues addressed in the new guidance include: 1) a requirement to review and, if there is a change, update assumptions for the liability for future policy benefits at least annually, and to update the discount rate assumption quarterly, 2) accounting for market risk benefits at fair value, 3) simplified amortization for deferred acquisition costs, and 4) enhanced financial statement presentation and disclosures. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application of the amendments is permitted, however, the Company does not expect to early adopt the updated standard.

The Company is thoroughly evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2018-12 and expects that the adoption will have a significant impact on the Company’s reported financial position, results of operations, and disclosures under U.S. GAAP accounting. The Company anticipates that the requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits will have a significant impact on its results of operations, while the requirement to update the discount rate will have a significant impact on its accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and equity. There are two permitted transition methods upon adoption, full retrospective and modified retrospective. Under the full retrospective method, the Company would restate all historical periods based upon actual historical experience as of contract inception and its updated view of the contractual cash flow projections at transition. A cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings would be recognized to reflect the actual experience and updated projections. The update of the discount rate would be recognized in AOCI. The Company will be permitted to apply a full retrospective transition approach if actual historical information is available for all contracts that will be affected by the new guidance. Under the modified retrospective method, the opening reserve balance at the transition date, January 1, 2019, would generally be the same as the closing balance before transition, updated for changes in the discount rate.

The Company expects that under either transition method, the impact to its reported financial statements under U.S. GAAP will be greatly influenced by the nature of the Company’s business model. Adoption of the new guidance under either method will reflect the Company’s concentration in Japan third-sector business, in particular cancer insurance, with respect to which the duration of liabilities is materially longer than asset durations. Depending on the transition method chosen upon adoption, the impact of a low discount rate applied to long-duration third sector liabilities is recognized at adoption, while associated favorable morbidity margins are recognized over time thus driving a pronounced timing impact to U.S. GAAP equity. In addition, with respect to the Japan segment, the Company maintains a large portfolio of assets designated as held-to-maturity (HTM) as a strategy to reduce capital (solvency margin ratio or SMR) volatility. In a low interest rate environment, such as presently exists in Japan, assets designated as HTM that were purchased in a higher interest rate environment have significant embedded gains not reflected in AOCI, which serves as an economic offset to a low discount rate applied to policy liabilities. At December 31, 2018, the Company’s HTM portfolio was $30.3 billion at amortized cost and had $6.5 billion in net unrealized gains. After adoption of the new guidance, the Company also expects net earnings and net earnings per share (which were $2.9 billion and $3.77 per diluted share, respectively, in 2018) to reflect larger quarterly fluctuations due to the new requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits.

As an example of the potential impact of the new guidance, and for illustrative purposes only, under the modified retrospective method and in a low interest rate environment, the Company would expect AOCI (which was $2.2 billion at December 31, 2018) to significantly decline upon adoption and to thereafter reflect larger quarterly fluctuations due to the new requirement to quarterly adjust discount rates. Conversely, in a higher interest rate environment, and again assuming adoption of the modified retrospective method for illustrative purposes, the Company would expect AOCI to decline less or even increase (depending on the specifics of the interest rate environment), as well as to reflect quarterly fluctuations. Under the full retrospective method, the Company would expect lesser declines or increases in total equity upon adoption

46


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

compared to the modified retrospective method due to the potential offsetting effect from updating experience and cash flow projections

The ultimate impact on these items from the Company’s implementation of the updated standard is subject to assessments that are dependent on many variables, including but not limited to (i) the transition method selected by the Company, which the Company continues to evaluate, (ii) how certain aspects of the new standard will be interpreted and implemented by the Company and other similar companies, such as (but not limited to) amortization of deferred acquisition costs, as well as establishment of policies, processes and controls for setting, monitoring and periodically updating reserve assumptions, and (iii) changes in the interest rate environment in the US and Japan.

The Company is in the early stages of reviewing transition methods and has only begun to assess the full impact of adoption; as such, the Company expects to provide periodic updates on its continuing assessment. However, the Company expects that while the adoption of this new accounting guidance will affect the Company’s financial statements under U.S. GAAP, it will not impact financial statements for Aflac Japan under FSA requirements or for Aflac U.S. under applicable statutory requirements. Therefore, the Company does not expect adoption of the updated standard to impact its subsidiaries’ dividend capacity or their ability to meet applicable regulatory capital standards, nor does the Company anticipate adoption to affect its strategies for capital deployment.

New Accounting Pronouncements


During the last three years, various accounting standard-setting bodies have been active in soliciting comments and issuing statements, interpretations and exposure drafts. For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on ourthe Company's financial position or results of operations, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

39



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion includes references to ourthe Company's performance measures, operatingadjusted earnings, and operatingadjusted earnings per diluted share,, that and amortized hedge costs, which are not based oncalculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Operating earnings isThese measures exclude items that the measure of segment profit or loss we use to evaluate segment performance and allocate resources. Consistent with U.S. GAAP accounting guidance for segment reporting, operating earnings is our measure of segment performance. AflacCompany believes that an analysis of operating earnings is vitally important to an understanding of ourmay obscure the underlying profitability driversfundamentals and trends of our insurance business. Furthermore, because a significant portion of our business is conducted in Japan, we believe it is equally important to understand the impact of translating Japanese yen into U.S. dollars.

Aflac defines operating earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as the profits derived from operations. Operating earnings includes interest cash flows associated with notes payable but excludes items that cannot be predicted or that are outside of management's control, such as realized investment gains and losses from securities transactions, impairments, and derivative and hedging activities; nonrecurring items; and other non-operating income (loss) from net earnings. Aflac's derivative activities are primarily used to hedge foreign exchange and interest rate risk in our investment portfolio as well as manage foreign exchange risk for certain notes payable and forecasted cash flows denominated in yen. Our management uses operating earnings to evaluate the financial performance of Aflac’sCompany's insurance operations because realized gains and losses from securities transactions, impairments, and derivative and hedging activities, as well as other and nonrecurring items,they tend to be driven by general economic conditions and events or related to infrequent activities not directly associated with its insurance operations. The Company's management uses adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share to evaluate the financial performance of its insurance operations on a consolidated basis, and the Company believes that a presentation of these measures is vitally important to an understanding of its underlying profitability drivers and trends of its insurance business. The Company believes that amortized hedge costs, which are a component of adjusted earnings, measure the periodic currency risk management costs associated with hedging a portion of Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments and are an important component of net investment income.

In 2018, the Company began utilizing the term “adjusted earnings” for the measure formerly referred to as "operating earnings" on both a pretax and after-tax basis, as well as an absolute and per-share basis. This change only pertained to the label of the measure and did not alter its definition or calculation.

Aflac defines adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as the profits derived from operations. The most comparative U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings. Adjusted earnings are adjusted revenues less benefits and adjusted expenses. The adjustments to both revenues and expenses account for certain items that cannot be predicted or that are outside management’s control. Adjusted revenues are U.S. GAAP total revenues excluding realized investment gains and losses, except for amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies. Adjusted expenses are U.S. GAAP total acquisition and operating expenses including the impact of interest cash flows from derivatives associated with notes payable but excluding any nonrecurring or other items not associated with the normal course of the Company’s insurance operations and therefore may obscurethat do not reflect Aflac’s underlying business performance.

The Company defines adjusted earnings per share (basic or diluted) to be adjusted earnings for the underlying fundamentalsperiod divided by the weighted average outstanding shares (basic or diluted) for the period presented. The most comparable U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings per share.

Amortized hedge costs represent costs incurred in using foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the foreign exchange risk of a portion of U.S. dollar-denominated assets in the Company’s Japan segment investment portfolio. These amortized hedge costs are derived from the difference between the foreign currency spot rate at time of trade

47


Item 7. Management's Discussion and trendsAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

inception and the contractual foreign currency forward rate, recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the hedge. There is no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for amortized hedge costs.

Because a significant portion of the Company's business is conducted in Aflac’s insurance operations.Japan and foreign exchange rates are outside of management’s control, the Company believes it is important to understand the impact of translating Japanese yen into U.S. dollars. Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior year period, which eliminates fluctuations driven solely by yen-to-dollar currency rate changes.


The following table is a reconciliation of items impacting operating and netadjusted earnings and operatingadjusted earnings per diluted share to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures of net earnings and net earnings per diluted share, respectively, for the years ended December 31.
Reconciliation of OperatingNet Earnings to NetAdjusted Earnings(1)
 In Millions Per Diluted Share
 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Operating earnings$2,670
 $2,797
 $2,887
 $6.16
 $6.16
 $6.18
Items impacting net earnings, net of tax:           
Realized investment gains (losses):           
Securities transactions and impairments97
 119
 41
 .23
 .26
 .09
Impact of derivative and hedging activities:           
   Hedge costs related to foreign currency
investments
(88) (24) (17) (.20) (.05) (.04)
   Other derivative and hedging activities27
(1) 
16
(1) 
229
(1) 
.06
 .03
 .49
Other and non-recurring income (loss)(173)
(2) 
43
 18
 (.40) .10
 .04
Net earnings$2,533
 $2,951
 $3,158
 $5.85
 $6.50
 $6.76
 In Millions Per Diluted Share
 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net earnings$2,920
 $4,604
 $2,659
 $3.77
 $5.77
 $3.21
Items impacting net earnings:           
Realized investment (gains) losses (2),(3),(4),(5)
297
 0
 (87) .38
 .00
 (.10)
Other and non-recurring (income) loss75
 69
 137
 .10
 .08
 .16
Income tax (benefit) expense on items
excluded from adjusted earnings
(83) (24) (18) (.11) (.03) (.02)
Tax reform adjustment (6)
18
 (1,933) 0
 .02
 (2.42) .00
Adjusted earnings3,226
 2,716
 2,691
 4.16
 3.40
 3.25
Current period foreign currency impact (7)
(28) N/A
 N/A
 (.04) N/A
 N/A
Adjusted earnings excluding current period
foreign currency impact
(8)
$3,198
 $2,716
 $2,691
 $4.13
 $3.40
 $3.25
(1) "Adjusted earnings" was formerly referred to as "operating earnings." Amounts may not foot due to rounding.
(2) Excludes amortized hedge costs of $236 in 2018, $228 in 2017 and $186 in 2016, related to hedging U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan which are classified as a component of adjusted earnings to conform to current year reporting. See "Hedge Costs" discussion below for further information.
(3) Amortized hedge costs in Aflac Japan were partially offset by derivatives entered into as part of corporate activities and resulted in a benefit of $36 in 2018, which has been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and reported as an increase in net investment income when analyzing operations.
(4) An immaterial amount of net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies in 2018 have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) into net investment income when analyzing operations.
(5) Excludes a gain of $54, $28$67 in 2018, $77 in 2017 and $6, after tax,$85 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively,2016, related to the interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on notes payable which is classified as an operating gain when analyzing segment operations
(2) (6)Includes a loss The impact of $13, afterTax Reform was estimated in 2017, and adjustments were recorded in 2018 for return-to-provision adjustments, various amended returns filed by the Company, and final true-ups of deferred tax in 2015 related to the change in value of yen repatriation received in advance of settlement of certainliabilities.
(7) Prior period foreign currency derivatives. This loss was offset by derivative gains included in other derivative and hedging activities.impact reflected as “N/A” to isolate change for current period only.

(8) Amounts excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior-year period, which eliminates dollar-based fluctuations driven solely from currency rate changes.

Realized Investment Gains and Losses


OurThe Company's investment strategy is to invest primarily in fixed-maturityfixed maturity securities to provide a reliable stream of investment income, which is one of the drivers of the Company’s growth and profitability. This investment strategy incorporates asset-liability matching (ALM) to align the expected cash flows of the portfolio to the needs of the Company's liability structure. We doThe Company does not purchase securities with the intent of generating capital gains or losses. However, investment gains and losses may be realized as a result of changes in the financial markets and the creditworthiness of specific issuers, tax planning strategies, and/or general portfolio management and rebalancing. The realization of investment gains and losses is independent of the underwriting and administration of ourthe Company's insurance products, whichproducts. Realized investment gains and losses include securities transactions, impairments, changes in loan loss reserves, and derivative and foreign currency activities. Effective January 1, 2018, changes in fair value of equity securities are the principal driversalso included in earnings as a component of our profitability.realized investment gains and losses.




4048



Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Securities Transactions, Impairments, and ImpairmentsGains (Losses) on Equity Securities


During 2015, we realized pretax investmentSecurities transactions include gains net ofand losses of $303 million($197 million after-tax) from sales and redemptions of securities. These net gains primarily resultedinvestments where the amount received is different from sales of Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs) as part of a portfolio repositioning exercise. We realized pretax investment losses of $153 million ($100 million after-tax) as a resultthe amortized cost of the recognition of other-than-temporary impairmentinvestment. Impairments include other-than-temporary-impairment losses on certain securities. Investmentinvestment securities as well as changes in loan loss reserves for loan receivables. Starting in the first quarter of 2018, gains and losses were primarily related to the recognitionfrom changes in fair value of an other-than-temporary impairment loss on a single holding.equity securities are recorded in earnings.


During 2014, we realized pretax investment gains, net of losses, of $215 million($140 million after-tax) from salesCertain Derivative and redemptions of securities. These net gains primarily resulted from gains on sales of JGBs and our U.S. Treasury holdings, currency gains from transactions by our externally managed portfolio of U.S. dollar-denominated bank loans, and assorted other bond sales and calls. We realized pretax investment losses of $31 million ($20 million after-tax) as a result of the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment losses on certain securities.Foreign Currency Gains (Losses)

During 2013, we realized pretax investment gains, net of losses, of $262 million ($170 million after-tax) from sales and redemptions of securities. These net gains primarily resulted from sales of JGBs as part of a portfolio repositioning exercise. We also realized modest gains from bond tender offers of several of our holdings. We realized pretax investment losses of $199 million ($129 million after-tax) as a result of the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment losses on certain securities.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on these investment activities.


The following table details our pretax impairment losses by investment category for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2015 2014 2013 
Perpetual securities$0
 $0
 $70
 
Corporate bonds17
 31
 102
 
Bank/financial institution bonds135
 0
 0
 
Sovereign and supranational0
 0
 26
 
Equity securities1
 0
 1
 
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses realized (1)
$153

$31

$199

(1) Includes $131 and $45 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2013, respectively, for credit-related impairments; $26 for the year ended December 31, 2013 for impairments due to severity and duration of decline in fair value; and $22, $31 and $128 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, from change in intent to sell securities

Impact of Derivative and Hedging Activities

OurCompany's derivative activities include foreign currency swaps and credit default swaps held in consolidated VIEs; foreign currency forwards and options interest rate swaptions and futures on certain fixed-maturityfixed maturity securities; foreign currency forwards and options that economically hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in yen and hedge the Company's long-term exposure to a weakening yen; and foreign currency swaps associated with certain senior notes and our subordinated debentures. During 2015, we realized pretax investmentdebentures; foreign currency swaps and credit defaults swaps held in consolidated VIEs; interest rate swaps used to economically hedge interest rate fluctuations in certain variable-rate investments; and interest rate swaptions to hedge changes in the fair value associated with interest rate changes for certain dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities. Gains and losses net of gains, of $10 million ($7 million after-tax), compared with pretax investment gains, net of losses, of $31 million ($20 million after-tax) in 2014 and pretax investment gains, net of losses, of $336 million ($218 million after-tax) in 2013are recognized as a result of valuing these derivatives, net of the effects of hedge accounting. For a descriptionThe Company also excludes the accounting impacts of other items that could beremeasurement associated with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate from adjusted earnings. Certain derivative and foreign currency gains (losses) exclude amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency exposure management strategies (see Hedge Cost section below), and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies and notes payable, all of which are included in adjusted earnings.

Hedge Costs

Effective January 1, 2017, adjusted earnings includes the Impactimpact of Derivativeamortized hedge costs. Amortized hedge costs represent costs incurred in using foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the foreign exchange risk of a portion of U.S. dollar-denominated assets in the Company's Japan segment investment portfolio. Amortized hedge costs are offset by a hedge cost amortization benefit recognized for foreign currency forwards that economically hedge the Company's long-term exposure to a weakening yen. These amortized hedge costs are derived from the difference between the foreign currency spot rate at time of trade inception and the contractual foreign currency forward rate, recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the hedge. There is no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for amortized hedge costs.

Hedge costs can fluctuate based upon many factors, including the derivative notional amount, the length of time of the derivative contract, changes in both U.S. and Japan interest rates, and supply and demand for dollar funding. Hedge costs have increased in recent periods due to changes in the previously mentioned factors. In late 2017, the Company
took steps to mitigate rising hedge costs by increasing the amount of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments held
in Aflac Japan and to reduce hedge cost volatility by extending hedge duration. For additional information regarding
currency hedging, refer to Hedging Activities seein the Hedging Activities subsectionAnalysis of MD&A and Note 4Financial Condition section of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.this MD&A.


For additional information regarding realized investment gains and losses, including details of reported amounts for the periods presented, see Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Other and Non-recurring Items


DuringThe United States insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the second quarterpolicyholders of 2015, the make-whole premium paidinsolvent insurers. The system can result in periodic charges to the investorsCompany as a result of our 8.50% fixed-rate senior notesinsolvencies/bankruptcies that occur with other companies in the life insurance industry. Some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. These charges neither relate to the ordinary course of the Company’s business nor reflect the Company’s underlying business performance, but result from external situations not controlled by the Company. Based on the underlying nature of these assessments in the United States, effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted a policy of excluding any charges associated with U.S. guaranty fund assessments and the corresponding tax benefit or expense from adjusted earnings.
For the Penn Treaty liquidation that was recognized by judicial authority in March 2017, the Company estimated and recognized a discounted liability for assessments of $62 million (undiscounted $94 million), offset by discounted premium tax credits of $48 million (undiscounted $74 million), for a net $14 million impact to net income in the quarter ended March 31, 2017. For additional information regarding guaranty fund assessments, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


49


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In Japan, the government also requires the insurance industry to contribute to a policyholder protection corporation that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers; however, these costs are calculated and administered differently than in the United States. In Japan, these costs are not directly related to specific insolvencies or bankruptcies, but are rather a regular operational cost for an insurance company. Based on this structure, the Company does not remove the Japan policyholder protection expenses from adjusted earnings.
Effective January 1, 2017, nonrecurring items also include conversion costs related to legally converting the Company's Japan branch to a subsidiary; these costs primarily consist of expenditures for legal, accounting, consulting, integration of systems and processes and other similar services. These Japan branch conversion costs amounted to $75 million in 2018 and $42 million in 2017.

The Company considers the costs associated with the early redemption of thoseits debt to be unrelated to the underlying fundamentals and trends in its insurance operations. Additionally, these costs are driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to the issuance of the debt, and the Company considers these interest rate changes to represent economic conditions not directly associated with its insurance operations. In November 2017, the Parent Company extinguished $500 million of its 5.50% subordinated debentures. The pretax non-operating expense due to the early redemption of these notes was recorded as$13 million. In 2016, the Parent Company completed a $230tender offer in which it extinguished $176 million principal of its 6.90% senior notes due 2039 and $193 million principal of its 6.45% senior notes due 2040. The pretax non-operating loss ($150 million after-tax, or $.35 per diluted share). The Company also includesdue to the accounting impactsearly redemption of remeasurement associated withthese notes was $137 million.

Tax Reform Adjustment

Among other changes, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the yen/dollar exchange rate asperiod of enactment, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recognized a non-recurring estimated $1.9 billion benefit for the reduction of the net deferred tax liability. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an other non-operating item.immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability.


41

For further information, see Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Taxes above in this MD&A, and Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.



Foreign Currency Translation
    
Aflac Japan’s premiums and mosta significant portion of its investment income are received in yen. Claimsyen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen, and we haveyen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets thatand U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into dollars for financial reporting purposes. We translateThe Company translates Aflac Japan’s yen-denominated income statement into dollars using anthe average exchange rate for the reporting period, and we translatethe Company translates its yen-denominated balance sheet using the exchange rate at the end of the period.
Due to the size of Aflac Japan, where ourwhose functional currency is the Japanese yen, fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on ourthe Company's reported results. In periods when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars results in fewer dollars being reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars results in more dollars being reported. Consequently, yen weakening has the effect of suppressing current period results in relation to the comparable prior period, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying current period results in relation to the comparable prior period. As a result, we view foreign currency translation as aManagement evaluates the Company's financial reporting issue for Aflac rather than an economic event to our Company or shareholders. Because changes in exchange rates distort the growth rates of our operations, management evaluates Aflac’s financial performance both including and excluding the impact of foreign currency translation.

translation to monitor, respectively, cumulative currency impacts on book value and the currency-neutral operating performance over time.
Income Taxes

OurThe Company's combined U.S. and Japanese effective income tax rate on pretax earnings was 34.4%26.7% in 2015, 34.3%2018, (14.6)% in 20142017 and 34.4%34.6% in 2013.2016. The reduction in the tax rate for 2017 was primarily due to the $1.9 billion benefit as a result of the Tax Act. The decrease in the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 drove the reduction in the effective tax rate for 2018 compared with years prior to 2017. Total income taxes were $1.3$1.1 billion in 2015,2018, compared with $1.5$(586) million in 2017 and $1.4 billion in 2014 and $1.7 billion in 2013.2016. Japanese income taxes on Aflac Japan's results account for most of ourthe Company's consolidated income tax expense. SeeFor further information, see Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Taxes above in this MD&A, and Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


Earnings Guidance

50
Our original objective for 2015 was


2019 Outlook

The Company’s strategy to increase operating earnings per diluted share by 2% to 7% over 2014, and we revised the objective during the year to a 4% to 7% increase, excluding the effect of foreign currency translation. In April 2015, we executed a make-whole transaction to enhance our consolidated capital position (see the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of this MD&A for further discussion). As a result of this transaction, we incurred a non-operating charge of $.35 to operating earnings per diluted share in the second quarter of 2015. However, operating earnings per diluted share benefited by approximately $.07 for the full year 2015 due to a net reduction in interest expense. We reported 2015 net earnings per diluted share of $5.85. Adjusting that number for after-tax realized investment gains ($.09 per diluted share), other non-operating expense ($.40 per diluted share), and foreign currency translation (an expense of $.46 per diluted share), we finished the year above the top of the target range with a 7.5% increase in operating earnings per diluted share.

Stronger than expected earnings growth from 2015 will create tough comparisons in 2016. Our objective for 2016drive long-term shareholder value is to produce stable operating earnings per diluted share of $6.17pursue growth through product development, distribution expansion and digital advancements to $6.41, assumingimprove the average exchange ratecustomer experience.

The Company's objectives in 2015 of 120.99 yen2019 are to the dollar. With volatile financial markets and interest rates at significantly depressed levels, it is difficult to safely invest cash flows at attractive yields. Additionally, 2016 benefit ratiosmaintain strong pre-tax margins in both the U.S. and Japan anticipate continued favorable experience. If we achieve our objective for 2016, the following table shows the likely results for operating earnings per diluted share, including the impact of foreign currency translation using various yen/dollar exchange rate scenarios.
2016 Operating Earnings Per Diluted Share Scenarios(1)
Weighted-Average
Yen/Dollar
Exchange Rate
 Operating Earnings
Per Diluted Share
 % Growth
Over 2015
 Yen Impact
110 $6.49 - 6.73 5.4
-9.3%  $.32
 
115 6.34 - 6.58 2.9
-6.8  .17
 
120.99(2)
 6.17 - 6.41 .2
-4.1  .00
 
125 6.07 - 6.31 (1.5)-2.4  (.10) 
130 5.95 - 6.19 (3.4)-.5  (.22) 
(1)Excludes realized investment gains/losses (securities transactions, impairments, and the impact of derivative and hedging activities), nonrecurring items, and other non-operating income (loss) in 2016 and 2015
(2)Actual 2015 weighted-average exchange rate

42



INSURANCE OPERATIONS
Aflac's insurance business consists of two segments:its Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. segments through disciplined product pricing, stable investment returns and leveraging a period of favorable benefit ratios to invest in its platform for future growth and efficiency. The Company believes that its market-leading position, powerful brand recognition and diverse distribution in Japan and the United States will provide support toward these objectives.
The Company believes that its efforts will support its prudent strategies for capital deployment in the form of dividends, share repurchases, and opportunistic investments that enhance the Company’s business with a focus on digital distribution and leveraging the Company’s brand, distribution and scale. The Company has stated that the dividend payout ratio from its Aflac Japan which operatessegment is likely to be in the range of 80% - 100% of FSA earnings. In its Aflac U.S. segment, the Company plans to continue its RBC drawdown plan to an RBC in the 500% range by the end of 2019.

Aflac Japan Segment
In Japan, the Company anticipates that the shift in earned premium from first sector savings products to third sector cancer and medical products and first sector protection products, will continue to result in moderately lower benefit ratios in the Aflac Japan segment. The Company also expects this shift in business mix, plus continued investment in IT and digital advancements, to result in moderately higher expense ratios for Aflac Japan. The Company believes that the Japan segment will face revenue challenges in 2019 due to the run-off and paid-up status of first sector savings products. In addition, net investment income is expected to decline modestly as compared to 2018, due in part to the low rate environment in Japan, de-risking of the portfolio and rolling U.S. dollar hedge positions into higher cost contracts.

Aflac U.S. Segment
The Company expects the profit margins for the Aflac U.S. segment to remain strong, providing a branchprudent opportunity to reinvest profits back into the U.S. business. The Company believes that in 2019, benefit ratios in the U.S. will continue to trend favorably and that expense ratios will continue to be elevated in light of investments into U.S. platforms in both the individual and group channels. Net investment income is expected to decline modestly, primarily as the result of the Company’s U.S. capital and RBC draw-down plan.

Corporate Segment
The Company expects corporate segment results to benefit from net investment income driven by increased capital and liquidity held at the Parent Company, as well as the Company’s enterprise currency hedging strategy. The anticipated increase in investment income is expected to be partially offset by increased costs associated with continued investment in Aflac isCorporate Ventures initiatives.

For important disclosures applicable to statements made in this 2019 Outlook, please see the principal contributor to consolidated earnings. Risk Factors section and the statement on “Forward-Looking Information” at the beginning of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

INSURANCE OPERATIONS
U.S. GAAP financial reporting requires that a company report financial and descriptive information about operating segments in its annual and interim period financial statements. Furthermore, we arethe Company is required to report a measure of segment profit or loss, certain revenue and expense items, and segment assets.

We evaluate our sales efforts using new annualized premium sales, an industry operating measure. New annualized premium sales, which include both new sales Aflac's insurance business consists of two segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. Aflac Japan is the principal contributor to consolidated earnings. Businesses that are not individually reportable, such as the Parent Company, and business activities, including reinsurance retrocession activities, not included in Aflac Japan or Aflac U.S. are included in the "Corporate and other" category. See the Item 1. Business section of this Form 10-K for a summary of each segment's products and distribution channels, and a discussion of the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary and the incremental increasecreation of asset management subsidiaries in premiums due to conversions, represent the premiums that we would collect over a 12-month period, assuming the policies remain in force. For Aflac Japan, new annualized premium sales are determined by applications submitted during the reporting period. For Aflac U.S., new annualized premium sales are determined by applications that are issued during the reporting period. Premium income, or earned premiums, is a financial performance measure that reflects collected or due premiums that have been earned ratably on policies in force during the reporting period.2018.

51



AFLAC JAPAN SEGMENT
Aflac Japan Pretax OperatingAdjusted Earnings


Changes in Aflac Japan's pretax operatingadjusted earnings and profit margins are primarily affected by morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency and investment yields. The following table presents a summary of operating results for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.
Aflac Japan Summary of Operating Results
(In millions)2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Net premium income$12,046
 $13,861
 $14,982
$12,762
 $12,752
 $13,537
Net investment income:          
Yen-denominated investment income1,227
 1,429
 1,497
1,283
 1,294
 1,346
Dollar-denominated investment income1,209
 1,233
 1,154
U.S. dollar-denominated investment income1,356
 1,169
 1,208
Net investment income2,436
 2,662
 2,651
2,639
 2,463
 2,554
Amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency denominated investments236
 228
 186
Net investment income, less amortized hedge costs2,403
 2,235
 2,368
Other income (loss)31
 32
 55
41
 41
 40
Total operating revenues14,513
 16,555
 17,688
Total adjusted revenues15,206
 15,028
 15,945
Benefits and claims, net8,705
 10,084
 10,924
8,913
 9,087
 9,828
Operating expenses:     
Adjusted expenses:     
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs578
 649
 641
710
 630
 644
Insurance commissions719
 845
 944
735
 736
 787
Insurance and other expenses1,336
 1,519
 1,551
1,640
 1,521
 1,538
Total operating expenses2,633
 3,013
 3,136
Total adjusted expenses3,085
 2,887
 2,969
Total benefits and expenses11,338
 13,097
 14,060
11,998
 11,974
 12,797
Pretax operating earnings(1)
$3,175
 $3,458
 $3,628
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
$3,208
 $3,054
 $3,148
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate120.99
 105.46
 97.54
110.39
 112.16
 108.70
  In Dollars In Yen
Percentage change over previous period:2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Net premium income(13.1)%
(7.5)% (12.7)%
(.4)% .1% 6.8%
Net investment income(8.5) .4
 (6.8) 4.8
 8.8
 13.9
Total operating revenues(12.3) (6.4) (11.8) .5
 1.3
 7.8
Pretax operating earnings(1)
(8.2) (4.7) (7.1) 5.3
 3.1
 13.6
  In Dollars In Yen
Percentage change over previous period:2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net premium income.1%
(5.8)% 12.4%
(1.5)% (2.7)% .8 %
Net investment income, less amortized
  hedge costs
7.5
 (5.6) .2
 5.5
 (2.0) (10.3)
Total adjusted revenues1.2
 (5.8) 10.4
 (.5) (2.5) (1.0)
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
5.0
 (3.0) 1.5
 3.1
 .6
 (9.0)
(1)Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the InsuranceResults of Operations section of this MD&A for ourthe Company's definition of segment operatingadjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.

The relatively small change inIn yen terms, Aflac Japan's net premium income decreased in 2018, with growth in third sector premium more than offset by an anticipated reduction in first sector premium due to savings products reaching premium paid-up status. Net investment income, net of amortized hedge costs, increased in 2018 largely due to higher income from U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate assets. Pretax adjusted earnings in yen for 2015increased, driven by higher net investment income and 2014 was influenced by the impact of weak firsta favorable third sector sales in 2015, 2014 and 2013 in addition to premiums ceded in reinsurance transactions during those same years. benefit ratio.

Annualized premiums in force at December 31, 2015,2018, were 1.621.53 trillion yen, compared with 1.591.55 trillion yen in 20142017 and

43



1.57 1.61 trillion yen in 2013.2016. The increasesdecrease in annualized premiums in force in yen of 1.5%1.6% in 2015, 1.7%2018 and 3.4% in 2014 and 5.0%2017 was driven primarily by limited-pay policies becoming paid-up during the year. The decrease in 2013 reflectannualized premiums in force in yen of .7% in 2016 reflects the net effect of sales of new policies combined with limited-pay policies becoming paid-up and the high persistency of Aflac Japan'sJapan’s business. Annualized premiums in force, translated into dollars at respective year-end exchange rates, were $13.4 billion in 2015, $13.2$13.8 billion in 20142018, $13.7 billion in 2017, and $14.9$13.8 billion in 20132016.



52


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Aflac Japan's investment portfolios include U.S. dollar-denominated securities and reverse-dual currency securities (yen-denominated debt securities with dollar coupon payments). U.S. dollar-denominated investment income from these assets accounted for approximately 50% of Aflac Japan's investment income in 2015, compared with 46% in 2014 and 44% in 2013. In years when the yen strengthens in relation to the dollar, translating Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investment income into yen lowers growth rates for net investment income, total operatingadjusted revenues, and pretax operatingadjusted earnings in yen terms. In years when the yen weakens, translating U.S. dollar-denominated investment income into yen magnifies growth rates for net investment income, total operatingadjusted revenues, and pretax operatingadjusted earnings in yen terms. Excluding foreign currency changes from the respective prior year, U.S. dollar-denominated investment income accounted for approximately 46% of Aflac Japan's investment income during 2015, compared with 44% in 2014 and 39% in 2013.


The following table illustrates the effect of translating Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investment income and related items into yen by comparing certain segment results with those that would have been reported had yen/dollardollar/yen exchange rates remained unchanged from the prior year. Amounts excluding foreign currency impact on U.S. dollar denominated investment income were determined using the average dollar/yen exchange rate for the comparable prior year period.
Aflac Japan Percentage Changes Over Prior Year
(Yen Operating Results)
  Including Foreign
Currency Changes
 
Excluding Foreign
Currency Changes
(2)
  2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Net investment income4.8% 8.8% 13.9% (1.9)% 4.8% 4.7%
Total operating revenues.5
 1.3
 7.8
 (.6) .7
 6.4
Pretax operating earnings(1)
5.3
 3.1
 13.6
 .4
 .3
 7.0
  Including Foreign
Currency Changes
 
Excluding Foreign
Currency Changes
(2)
  2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net investment income, less
amortized hedge costs
5.5 % (2.0)% (10.3)% 6.4 % (3.6)% (5.1)%
Total adjusted revenues(.5) (2.5) (1.0) (.3) (2.8) (.1)
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
3.1
 .6
 (9.0) 3.7
 (.5) (5.3)
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the InsuranceResults of Operations section of this MD&A for ourthe Company's definition of segment operatingadjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.
(2)Amounts excluding foreign currency changesimpact on U.S. dollar-denominated itemsinvestment income (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) were determined using the same yen/dollaraverage dollar/yen exchange rate for the currentcomparable prior year as each respective prior year.period.
The following table presents a summary of operating ratios in yen terms for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.
Ratios to total revenues:2015 2014 2013 
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:2018 2017 2016 
Benefits and claims, net60.0% 60.9% 61.7% 58.6% 60.4% 61.6% 
Operating expenses:      
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs4.0
 3.9
 3.6
 4.7
 4.2
 4.0
 
Insurance commissions5.0
 5.1
 5.3
 4.8
 4.9
 4.9
 
Insurance and other expenses9.1
 9.2
 8.9
 10.8
 10.1
 9.8
 
Total operating expenses18.1
 18.2
 17.8
 
Pretax operating earnings(1)
21.9
 20.9
 20.5
 
Total adjusted expenses20.3
 19.2
 18.7
 
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
21.1
 20.4
 19.7
 
Ratios to total premiums:      
Benefits and claims, net69.9% 71.3% 72.6% 
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs5.6
 4.9
 4.8
 
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the InsuranceResults of Operations section of this MD&A for ourthe Company's definition of segment operatingadjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.


In 2015,2018, the benefit ratio decreased, compared with 2014, resulting fromto the impactprior year, primarily due to the continued change in mix of reinsurance; changesfirst and third sector business as first sector products become paid-up, as well as continued favorable third sector claims trends, and higher surrender rates for the cancer products. In 2018, the adjusted expense ratio increased due to lower premium income impacted by first sector products becoming paid-up, higher expenses primarily related to increased system development, outsourcing costs for new products, and DAC amortization due to the increase of surrender for cancer products. In total for 2018, the pretax adjusted profit margin increased, reflecting the decrease in foreign currency; and favorable claims experience. The three reinsurance agreements that we entered into since the end of the third quarter of 2013 reduced the benefit ratio partially offset by approximately 99 basis points for 2015. The benefit ratio has also been influenced bya smaller increase in the effect of low investment yields, which impacts ourexpense ratio. For 2019, the Company anticipates the Aflac Japan pretax adjusted profit margin (calculated by reducing the spread between investment yields and required interest on policy reserves (see table and discussion in the Interest Rate Risk subsection of this MD&A). In 2015, the operating expense ratio remained relatively stable, compared with 2014. In total, the pretax operating profit margin improved in 2015, compared with 2014. For 2016, we anticipate the pretax operating profit margindividing adjusted earnings by adjusted revenues) to be comparable with the 2015 and 2014 levels.remain stable.




4453




Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Aflac Japan Sales


The following table presents Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales for the years ended December 31.
In Dollars In YenIn Dollars In Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
New annualized premium sales$997
 $1,080
 $1,539
 120.9
 114.5
 149.3
$869
 $846
 $1,045
 95.9
 94.9
 113.7
Increase (decrease) over prior period(7.7)% (29.8)% (41.7)% 5.5% (23.3)% (29.1)%2.7% (19.0)% 4.8% 1.1% (16.6)% (5.9)%


The following table details the contributions to Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales by major insurance product for the years ended December 31.
2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Cancer65.8%
55.8%
46.6%
Medical26.4%
31.8%
27.9%
25.0
 34.1
 26.0
 
Cancer40.4
 30.3
 17.0
 
Income support1.8
 2.3
 0.0
 
Ordinary life:            
WAYS.5
 .6
 11.9
 
Child endowment8.2
 10.2
 11.7
 .3
 .5
 6.4
 
WAYS16.7
 14.0
 27.5
 
Other ordinary life6.2
 8.3
 10.3
 
Other ordinary life (1)
6.1
 6.0
 6.2
 
Other2.1
 5.4
 5.6
 .5
 .7
 2.9
 
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(1) Includes term and whole life

The foundation of Aflac Japan's product portfolio has been, and continues to be, our third sector products, which include cancer, medical and medicalIncome Support insurance products. SalesNew annualized premium sales of third sector products on a yen basis increased 13.4% in 2015,1.6% during 2018, compared with 2017. Third sector sales included growth in the same periodnew cancer insurance product that was launched in 2014, exceedingApril 2018, however medical sales have declined compared with 2017 as a result of strong sales in 2017 driven by the high endintroduction of our revised sales target rangethe new medical insurance product in the second quarter of 10% to 13%. We have2017. Aflac Japan has been focusing more on promotion of our cancer and medical insurance products in this low-interest-rate environment. These products are less interest-rate sensitive and more profitable compared to first sector products.

Sales of cancer insurance continued to be strong following the introduction at the end of the third quarter of 2014 of New Cancer DAYS, which includes an exclusive policy sold through Japan Post. Cancer insurance sales were up 40.6% in 2015, compared with 2014. Aflac Japan enhanced its medical product with new riders in June 2015. This revision provides better protection against critical diseases such as cancer, heart attack and stroke. With continued cost pressure on Japan’s health care system, we expectthe Company expects the need for third sector products will continue to rise in the future and we remain convinced that the medical and cancer insurance products Aflac Japan provides will continue to be an important part of ourits product portfolio.


Aflac Japan’s first sector product sales, which include WAYS and child endowment, were down 7.3% in 2015, compared with 2014. We expect that for 2016, the sale of first sector products will continue to be down in comparison to 2015, as our focus remains on less interest-sensitive third sector products.

We remain committed to selling through our traditional channels. These channels, consisting of affiliated corporate agencies, independentIndependent corporate agencies and individual agencies accounted for 85.1%contributed 40.1% of total new annualized premium sales for Aflac Japan in 2015.2018, compared with 42.8% in 2017 and 46.7% in 2016. Affiliated corporate agencies, which include Japan Post, contributed 55.3% of total new annualized premium sales in 2018, compared with 52.0% in 2017 and 44.4% in 2016. Japan Post offers Aflac's cancer insurance products in more than 20,000 post offices. In 2015, we2018, Japan Post's sales of cancer insurance constituted approximately 25% of Aflac Japan's third sector sales. The Company believes this alliance with Japan Post has and will further benefit its cancer insurance sales. In 2018, Aflac Japan recruited over 30085 new sales agencies. At December 31, 2015,2018, Aflac Japan was represented by more than 13,1009,800 sales agencies, and approximately 114,000with more than 109,000 licensed sales associates employed by those agencies.
At December 31, 2015, we2018, Aflac Japan had agreements to sell ourits products at 372371 banks, approximately 90% of the total number of banks in Japan. Bank channel sales accounted for 14.9%4.6% of new annualized premium sales in 20152018 for Aflac Japan, compared with 21.5%5.2% in 2014.2017 and 8.9% in 2016.


Aflac Japan and Japan Post Holdings entered into a new agreement in July 2013, further expanding a partnership that was established in 2008 (see Japanese Regulatory Environment). At the end of June 2014, Japan Post Insurance(Kampo) received Financial Services Agency (FSA) regulatory approval to enter into an agency contract with Aflac Japan to begin distributing Aflac Japan's cancer insurance products at all of Kampo's 79 directly managed sales offices. Aflac Japan has developed a unique Aflac-branded cancer product for Japan Post and Kampo that was introduced on October

45



1, 2014. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the number of postal outlets selling our cancer products expanded to approximately 10,000, and starting July 1, 2015, Japan Post expanded the number of post offices that offer Aflac's cancer products to more than 20,000 postal outlets. We believe this alliance with Japan Post will further benefit our cancer insurance sales.

We believe that there is still a continued need for our products in Japan. Our sales target and focus in 2016 will continue to be centered around the sale of Aflac Japan's third sector products, including cancer and medical. Although our traditional channels remain key to our success, we have developed partnerships with new channels to help increase our overall sales growth. These channels include Japan Post, and we are making steady progress with our sales through postal outlets. In 2016, we believe that third sector sales will be down mid-single digits in comparison to 2015. We believe that the long-term compound annual growth rate will be in the range of 4% to 6%.

Japanese Regulatory Environment

In 2005, legislation aimed at privatizing Japan's postal system (Japan Post) was enacted into law. The privatization laws split Japan Post into four operating entities that began operations in October 2007. In 2007, one of these entities selected Aflac Japan as its provider of cancer insurance to be sold through its post offices, and, in 2008, we began selling cancer insurance through these post offices. Japan Post has historically been a popular place for consumers to purchase insurance products. Legislation to reform the postal system passed the Diet in April 2012 and resulted in the merger of two of the postal operating entities (the one that delivers the mail and the one that runs the post offices) on October 1, 2012. In July 2013, Aflac Japan entered into a new agreement with Japan Post Holdings to further expand a partnership that was established in 2008 (see Aflac Japan Sales).

In June 2013, a revision to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act established a post-funded Orderly Resolution Regime for financial institutions to prevent a financial crisis in the event of a financial institution’s failure. This regime came into effect in March 2014, but is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's operations in Japan.

Aflac Japan Investments


The level of investment income in yen is affected by available cash flow from operations, the timing of investing the cash flow, yields on new investments, the effect of yen/dollar exchange rates on U.S. dollar-denominated investment income, and other factors.


As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac Japan invests in yen and U.S. dollar-denominated securities,investments. Yen-denominated investments primarily consist of JGBs and public and private fixed maturity securities. Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investments include fixed maturity investments and growth

54


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

assets, including publicly-traded investment grade and below investment grade corporate fixed-maturitypublic equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships or similar investment vehicles. Aflac Japan has been investing in both publicly-traded and privately originated U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loan receivables, Aflac Japan has entered into foreign currency forwards and options to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of a portion of the U.S. dollar securities. In 2015, as part of our normal portfolio managementinvestments, interest rate swaptions to hedge interest rate fluctuations on some U.S. dollar investments, and asset allocation process,interest rate swaps to economically hedge interest rate fluctuations in certain variable-rate investments.

The following table details the investment purchases for Aflac Japan increasedfor the allocationyears ended December 31.
(In millions) 2018 2017 
Yen-denominated:     
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Japan government and agencies $3,895
 $5,367
 
     Other fixed maturity securities 1,981
 1,579
 
  Equity securities 221
 189
 
        Total yen-denominated $6,097
 $7,135
 
      
U.S. dollar-denominated:     
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Other fixed maturity securities $1,299
 $466
 
     Infrastructure debt 0
 134
 
     Bank loans 346
 0
 
  Equity securities 120
 158
 
  Other investments:     
     Transitional real estate loans 3,168
 1,063
 
     Commercial mortgage loans 13
 48
 
     Middle market loans 839
 548
 
     Limited partnerships 314
 96
 
        Total dollar-denominated $6,099
 $2,513
 
            Total Aflac Japan purchases $12,196
 $9,648
 

Aflac Japan purchased $1.2 billion of investments to a U.S. dollar senior secured bank loan program by approximately $950 million and to a U.S. dollar high yield corporate bond program by approximately $650 million, all of which had been funded as of December 31, 2015.yen-denominated private placements in 2018, compared with $1.1 billion in 2017.

During the third and fourth quarters of 2015, we increased our investment in yen-denominated publicly traded equity securities, including new investments in exchange traded funds (ETFs) holding Japan real estate investment trusts. These securities are classified as available for sale and carried on our balance sheet at fair value. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value of our investment in yen-denominated publicly traded equity securities was $485 million.


See the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A for further discussion of these investment programs.programs, and see Notes 1, 3 and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding loans and loan receivables.


Funds available for investment include cash flows from operations, investment income, and funds generated from maturities, redemptions, securities lending, and other securities transactions. Securities lending is also used from time to time to accelerate the availability of funds for investment. Purchases of securities from period to period are determined based on multiple objectives including appropriate portfolio diversification, the relative value of a potential investment and availability of investment opportunities, liquidity, credit and other risk factors while adhering to ourthe Company's investment policy guidelines. Aflac Japan purchased debt security investments at an aggregate acquisition cost of approximately 663.6 billion yen in 2015 (approximately $5.5 billion), 1.0 trillion yen in 2014 (approximately $10.0 billion) and 2.5 trillion yen in 2013 (approximately $25.4 billion).

The following table presents the composition of debt security purchases by sector and equity security purchases for Aflac Japan, as a percentage of acquisition cost, for the years ended December 31.

46



Composition of Purchases by Sector
 2015 2014 2013 
Debt security purchases, at cost:      
Banks/financial institutions1.1%
.4%
.4%
Government and agencies35.8
 74.1
 76.2
 
Municipalities.7
 1.0
 .0
 
Public utilities4.2
 2.6
 3.3
 
Other corporate50.5
 21.9
 20.1
 
Equity securities7.7
 .0
 .0
 
 Total100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

We use specific criteria to judge the credit quality of both existing and prospective investments. Furthermore, we use several methods to monitor these criteria, including credit rating services and internal credit analysis. The ratings referenced in the two tables below are based on the ratings designations provided by the major credit rating agencies (Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (S&P), and Fitch Ratings (Fitch)) or, if not rated, are determined based on our internal credit analysis of such securities. For investment-grade securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit agencies are not equivalent, we use the second lowest rating that is assigned. For a description of the ratings methodology that we use when a security is below investment grade or split-rated (one rating agency rates the security as investment grade while another rating agency rates the same security as below investment grade), see “Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Below-Investment-Grade and Split-Rated Securities” in the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A.

The distributions by credit rating of Aflac Japan's purchases of debt securities for the years ended December 31, based on acquisition cost, were as follows:

Composition of Purchases by Credit Rating
 2015 2014 2013
AAA.0% 7.7% .3%
AA.8
 78.6
 77.7
A42.5
 5.4
 10.9
BBB21.0
 6.6
 9.4
BB or Lower35.7
 1.7
 1.7
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

The relatively higher AAA rated purchases in 2014 resulted from our decision to allocate part of our U.S. dollar securities allocation to U.S. Treasuries, in addition to our purchases of investment-grade corporate bonds. We sold these U.S. Treasuries later in 2014. The relatively higher purchases of AA rated securities in 2014 and 2013 were primarily due to the purchase of JGBs. The increase in purchases of A rated securities in 2015 was due primarily to the purchase of JBGs, which had been downgraded from AA to A in the fourth quarter of 2014. The increase in purchases of BBB rated securities in 2015 was due primarily to the purchase of U.S. dollar-denominated corporate securities. The significant increase in purchases of BB or lower rated securities during 2015 was due to increased investment in senior secured bank loans, most of which have below-investment-grade ratings, and investment in high yield corporate bonds. For more information on these investments, see the Credit Risk subsection of this MD&A.


The following table presents the results of Aflac Japan's investment yields for the years ended and as of December 31.


4755




Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 
2015(1)
 
2014(1)
 
2013(1)
New money yield2.92% 2.16% 2.48%
Return on average invested assets, net of investment expenses2.80
 2.80
 2.86
Portfolio book yield, including dollar-denominated investments, end of period2.80
 2.83
 2.80
 2018 2017 2016
Total purchases for the period (in millions) (1)
$11,882
 $9,552
 $10,903
New money yield (1),(2)
3.06% 1.98% 1.40%
Return on average invested assets (3)
2.33
 2.31
 2.47
Portfolio book yield, including U.S. dollar-denominated investments,
end of period
(1)
2.61% 2.56% 2.62%
(1)Yields are reported before the costIncludes fixed maturity securities, loan receivables, equity securities, and excludes alternative investments in limited partnerships
(2)Reported on a gross yield basis; excludes investment expenses, external management fees, and amortized hedge costs
(3)Net of the foreign currency forwards thatinvestment expenses and amortized hedge foreign exchange risk of U.S. dollar-denominatedcosts, year-to-date number reflected on a quarterly average basis
publicly traded corporate bonds.

The new money yield in the table above excludes certain purchases of senior secured bank loans and high yield corporate bonds funded from the reinvestment of unplanned sales proceeds. The increase in the Aflac Japan new money yield in 20152018 was primarily due to a large portion of 2015 new money being allocatedincreased allocations to higher yielding U.S. dollar-denominated investments rather than relatively low-yielding JGBs.asset classes.

The following table presents the composition of total investments by sector, at cost or amortized cost, and cash for Aflac Japan ($85.1 billion in 2015 and 2014) as of December 31.

Composition of Portfolio by Sector
 2015
 2014
 
Debt and perpetual securities, at amortized cost:    
Banks/financial institutions(1)
11.5% 13.2% 
Government and agencies43.8
 43.9
 
Municipalities.8
 .8
 
Public utilities8.9
 9.3
 
Sovereign and supranational4.1
 4.1
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities.5
 .5
 
Other corporate(2)
28.6
 26.0
 
Total debt and perpetual securities98.2
 97.8
 
Equity securities.5
 .0
 
Other investments.2
 .2
 
Cash and cash equivalents1.1
 2.0
 
Total investments and cash100.0% 100.0% 
(1)Includes 1.9% and 2.6% of perpetual securities at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively
(2)Includes .2% of perpetual securities at December 31, 2015 and 2014

Our highest sector concentration is in government and agencies. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Credit Risk subsection of MD&A for more information regarding the sector concentrations of our investments.

Yen-denominated debt and perpetual securities accounted for 72.8% of Aflac Japan's total debt and perpetual securities at December 31, 2015, compared with 75.7% at December 31, 2014, at amortized cost.

The distributions of debt and perpetual securities owned by Aflac Japan, by credit rating, as of December 31 were as follows:
Composition of Portfolio by Credit Rating
   2015   2014 
  Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
AAA 1.2%   1.2%   1.3%   1.2% 
AA 5.3
   5.4
   5.3
   5.4
 
A 63.5
   65.4
   66.4
   67.4
 
BBB 24.8
   23.0
   23.0
   22.0
 
BB or lower 5.2
   5.0
   4.0
   4.0
 
Total 100.0%   100.0%   100.0%   100.0% 


48



The overall credit quality of Aflac Japan's investments remained high. At the end of 2015, 94.8% of Aflac Japan's debt and perpetual securities were rated investment grade, on an amortized cost basis.


See Notes 3, 4 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A for additional information on ourthe Company's investments and hedging strategies.


AFLAC U.S. SEGMENT
Aflac U.S. Pretax OperatingAdjusted Earnings
Changes in Aflac U.S. pretax operatingadjusted earnings and profit margins are primarily affected by morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency and investment yields. The following table presents a summary of operating results for Aflac U.S. for the years ended December 31.
Aflac U.S. Summary of Operating Results
(In millions)2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Net premium income$5,347
 $5,211
 $5,153
$5,708
 $5,563
 $5,454
Net investment income678
 645
 632
727
 721
 703
Other income8
 3
 6
8
 5
 10
Total operating revenues6,033
 5,859
 5,791
Total adjusted revenues6,443
 6,289
 6,167
Benefits and claims2,873
 2,853
 2,889
2,887
 2,885
 2,869
Operating expenses:     
Adjusted expenses:     
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs488
 459
 433
534
 502
 497
Insurance commissions585
 590
 583
585
 580
 580
Insurance and other expenses986
 884
 848
1,152
 1,077
 1,013
Total operating expenses2,059
 1,933
 1,864
Total adjusted expenses2,271
 2,159
 2,090
Total benefits and expenses4,932
 4,786
 4,753
5,158
 5,044
 4,959
Pretax operating earnings(1)
$1,101
 $1,073
 $1,038
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
$1,285
 $1,245
 $1,208
Percentage change over previous period:          
Net premium income2.6% 1.1% 3.1%2.6% 2.0% 2.0%
Net investment income5.0
 2.1
 3.2
.8
 2.6
 3.8
Total operating revenues3.0
 1.2
 2.9
Pretax operating earnings(1)
2.7
 3.3
 4.1
Total adjusted revenues2.4
 2.0
 2.2
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
3.2
 3.1
 9.7
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the InsuranceResults of Operations section of this MD&A for ourthe Company's definition of segment operatingadjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.


Net investment income increased in 2018, driven by higher income from floating rate assets partially offset from the drawdown of excess capital in the U.S. segment. Annualized premiums in force increased1.6% 3.0% in 20152018, 1.8%2.6% in 20142017 and 2.2%2.4% in 20132016. Annualized premiums in force at December 31 were $5.8$6.2 billion in 20152018, compared with $5.7$6.1 billion in 20142017 and $5.6$5.9 billion in 20132016.



56


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following table presents a summary of operating ratios for Aflac U.S. for the years ended December 31.
Ratios to total revenues:2015 2014 2013 
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:2018 2017 2016 
Benefits and claims47.6% 48.7%
49.9%
44.8% 45.9%
46.5%
Operating expenses:      
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs8.1
 7.8
 7.5
 8.3
 8.0
 8.1
 
Insurance commissions9.7
 10.1
 10.1
 9.1
 9.2
 9.4
 
Insurance and other expenses16.3
 15.1
 14.6
 17.9
 17.1
 16.4
 
Total operating expenses34.1
 33.0
 32.2
 
Pretax operating earnings(1)
18.3
 18.3
 17.9
 
Total adjusted expenses35.2
 34.3
 33.9
 
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
19.9
 19.8
 19.6
 
Ratios to total premiums:      
Benefits and claims50.6
 51.9
 52.6
 
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs9.4
 9.0
 9.1
 
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the InsuranceResults of Operations section of this MD&A for ourthe Company's definition of segment operatingadjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.


The benefit ratio decreased in 2015,2018, compared with 2014,2017, due in large part to mixbenefit reserve releases related to slightly elevated lapses of business changesolder individual cancer policies in the first and continued favorable claims experience.fourth quarters of 2018. The adjusted expense ratio increased slightly in 2015,2018 compared with 2014,2017, primarily due to increasedplanned spending

49



associated with changes increases reflecting elevated investments in the Aflac U.S. sales structure. In total, theplatform. The pretax operatingadjusted profit margin remained stableincreased slightly in 2015,2018 when compared with 2014.2017, primarily due to lower benefit ratios. In 2016, we expect2019, the Company expects benefit and expense ratios to be relatively stable compared with 2015.slightly lower than 2018 levels, reflecting ongoing changes in business mix, and expects somewhat higher expense ratios reflecting further investments in its U.S. platform. Net investment income is expected to decline modestly, primarily the result of the Company’s U.S. capital and RBC drawdown plan. (Note that all of these ratios-to-revenue reflect reduced net investment income due to the Company's planned drawdown of excess capital to lower RBC ratios. See the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of this MD&A for further discussion of the planned reduction of RBC.)


Aflac U.S. Sales
The following table presents Aflac's U.S. new annualized premium sales for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
New annualized premium sales$1,487
 $1,433
 $1,424
 $1,601
 $1,552
 $1,482
 
Increase (decrease) over prior period3.7% .7% (4.3)% 3.2% 4.7% (.3)% 
    
The following table details the contributions to Aflac's U.S. new annualized premium sales by major insurance product category for the years ended December 31.
2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Income-loss protection:      
Accident29.2% 29.4% 29.5% 
Short-term disability23.2% 22.4% 21.2% 22.7
 22.9
 23.5
 
Life5.2
 5.8
 5.3
 
Asset-loss protection:      
Accident29.9
 28.1
 27.3
 
Critical care (1)
21.9
 21.4
 20.8
 22.1
 22.8
 22.1
 
Supplemental medical:      
Hospital indemnity14.6
 16.4
 16.9
 15.8
 14.8
 14.8
 
Dental/vision5.2
 5.9
 6.2
 4.7
 5.1
 5.0
 
Other.0
 .0
 2.3
 
Life5.5
 5.0
 5.1
 
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 
 
(1) Includes cancer, critical illness and hospital intensive care products


New annualized premium sales for accident insurance, ourthe Aflac U.S. leading product category, increased 10.2%2.4%, short-term disability sales increased 7.6%1.8%, critical care insurance sales (including cancer insurance) increased 6.0%decreased .1%, and hospital indemnity insurance sales decreased 7.5%increased 10.4% in 2015,2018, compared with 2014.2017.
In 2015, our traditional U.S. sales forces included more than 9,200 U.S. associates who were actively producing business on a weekly basis. We believe that the average weekly producing sales associates metric allows our sales management to actively monitor progress
57


Item 7. Management's Discussion and needs on a real-time basis. Beyond expanding the sizeAnalysis of Financial Condition and capabilitiesResults of our traditional sales force, we remain encouraged about establishing and developing relationships with insurance brokers that typically handle the larger-case market.Operations

The addition of group products has expanded ourAflac U.S.'s reach and enabled usAflac U.S. to generate more sales opportunities with larger employers and through brokers and our traditional sales agents. We anticipateagent channels. The Company anticipates that the appeal of ourAflac U.S. group products will continue to enhance our opportunities to connect with larger businesses and their employees. OurThe Aflac U.S. portfolio of group and individual products offers businesses the opportunity to give their employees a more valuable and comprehensive selection of benefit options.

We believe that changes we made to our career and broker management infrastructure overIn 2018, the last 18 months are laying the foundation for expanded long-term growth opportunities. During 2014, Aflac U.S. implemented tactical initiatives centered around providing competitive compensation to our career agent sales hierarchy and positioning us toforces included an average of more effectively and consistently executethan 8,500 U.S. agents, including brokers, who were actively producing business on the U.S. sales strategy across all states. These measures are designed to more effectively link sales management's success to Aflac's success. For example, we enhanced compensation through an incentive bonus for the first level of oura weekly basis. The Company believes that this average weekly producer equivalent metric allows sales management district sales coordinators, who are primarily responsible for selling Aflac productsto monitor progress and training new sales associates. Additionally, we eliminated the commission-based position of state sales coordinator. To better manage our state operations, we introduced the new position of market director, effective October 1, 2014. Market directors are salaried with the opportunity to earn sales-related bonuses. We believe these changes have enhanced and will continue to enhance performance management and better align compensation with new business results.needs.


50



One Day PaySMis a claims initiative that we haveAflac U.S. has focused on at Aflac U.S. to process, approve and pay eligible claims in just one day. We believeThe Company believes that along with our brand and relevant products, this claims practice will helpenhances the Aflac U.S. brand reputation and the trust policyholders have in Aflac, and it helps Aflac stand out from competitors.


With the evolving business market and the coverage standardization that will result from health care reform in the United States, we believe Aflac's voluntary products will become more relevant than ever. OurAflac U.S. products provide cash benefits that can be used to help with increasing out-of-pocket medical expenses, help cover household costs, or protect against income and asset loss. Our groupGroup products and relationships with insurance brokers that handle the larger-case market are helping us as weAflac U.S. expand ourits reach by selling to larger businesses. We areAflac U.S. is regularly evaluating the marketplace to identify opportunities to bring the most relevant, cost-effective products to our customers. We believeThe Company believes the need for ourits products remains very strong, and we continueAflac U.S. continues to work on enhancing ourits distribution capabilities to access employers of all sizes, including initiatives that benefit ourthe field force and the broker community. At the same time, we arethe Company is seeking opportunities to leverage ourits brand strength and attractive product portfolio in the evolving health care environment. For 2016, our objective is for Aflac U.S. new annualized premium sales to increase 3% to 5%, with a long-term compound annual growth rate at or above the voluntary market growth rate of 5%.


U.S. Regulatory Environment


Healthcare Reform Legislation

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is, federal health care legislation, was intended to give Americans of all ages and income levels access to comprehensive major medical health insurance and gave the U.S. federal government direct regulatory authority over the business of health insurance. TheWhile the ACA was enacted in 2010, the major elements of the billlaw became effective on January 1, 2014. The primary subjectACA included major changes to the U.S. health care insurance marketplace. Among other changes, the ACA included an individual medical insurance coverage mandate (which has since been repealed effective 2019 by the Tax Act), provided for penalties on certain employers for failing to provide adequate coverage, created health insurance exchanges, and addressed coverage and exclusions as well as medical loss ratios. It also imposed an excise tax on certain high cost plans, known as the “Cadillac tax,” that is currently scheduled to begin in 2022. The ACA also included changes in government reimbursements and tax credits for individuals and employers and altered federal and state regulation of the legislation is major medical insurance;health insurers. The ACA, as enacted, the ACA does not materially affectrequire material changes in the design of ourthe Company's insurance products. However, indirect consequences of the legislation and regulations including uncertainty related to implementation, could present challenges and/or opportunities that could potentially have an impact on ourthe Company's sales model, financial condition and results of operations. Our experience with Japan’s nationalThe United States Congress has considered and may continue to consider legislation that would repeal and replace key provisions of the ACA. There can be no assurance that any legislation affecting the ACA will be passed by Congress, nor as to the ultimate timing or provisions of any such legislation, nor as to the effect of any such legislation on the design or marketability of the Company's insurance products. Further, certain provisions of the ACA have been and may continue to be subject to challenge through litigation, the ultimate effects of which on the ACA are uncertain.

President Trump signed an Executive Order in October 2017 directing federal regulatory agencies to review and modify certain regulations issued under the ACA. The stated objectives of the Executive Order are to increase competition and consumer choices in health care environment leads usmarkets, and to believelower costs for health care, by making association health plans available to more employers, allowing employers to make better use of health reimbursement arrangements, and expanding coverage through short-term insurance. The Executive Order tasks three federal agencies, the Departments of Labor (DOL), Treasury, and Health and Human Services (HHS) with reviewing current rules and developing guidance to implement the order. While the details of any proposed modifications will not be known until further action by the agencies, the Company anticipates that the need for supplemental insuranceExecutive Order will only increase overnot have a significant impact on the coming years.availability or marketability of its products.


On December 18, 2015, the president
58


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Tax Reform Legislation

The Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, effective January 1, 2018, the Consolidated AppropriationsTax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated or reduced certain deductions and credits and limited the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation.

The Tax Act also transitions international corporate taxation from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system, which included a revision to delay implementationin light of the Excise Tax on High Cost Plans, better knowncurrent tax treatment of Aflac Japan as a branch has the "Cadillac tax.” This tax was originally scheduledeffect of subjecting the earnings of Aflac Japan to begin in 2017, was previously delayed until 2018,Japan taxation and is now scheduled to begin in 2020. The tax consists of 40%subjecting the Company's other earnings, including the consolidated earnings of the costParent Company, to U.S. taxation. The treatment of employer sponsored health coverage in excessAflac Japan as a branch for U.S. tax purposes did not change following the completion of certain dollar thresholds. In general, only its conversion from a branch structure to a subsidiary structure for legal purposes on April 1, 2018.

Aflac specified disease and fixed indemnity (i.e. supplemental health) products offeredU.S. prices its business on an internal rate of return basis. The Aflac U.S. business has a financial structure that the Company expects to be neutral on a pre-taxpricing basis are taken into account under this tax.  

from these tax changes. The legislation also makes the tax deductible by the payer. If employers fund coverage on a pre-tax basis, Aflac as the insurer, would be liableU.S. products have high initial costs for its pro-rata share of any tax on excess coverage, determined based on the cost of Aflac coverage compared to the total cost of the applicable health coverage inmarketing, underwriting and administration, which each employee is enrolled. Making the tax deductible would then reduce the economic impact of any tax that is imposed and payable by Aflac. 

Many employers are concerned about the tax and what impact it will have on benefit offeringsless tax relief under the changes and will increase the amount required to invest in new business. In addition, the future. There is confusion in the market about how the tax is calculated and who pays the tax, presenting a riskCompany expects that some employersRBC requirements will mistakenly conclude thatall supplemental health products are included in the calculation for the tax regardless of pre-tax funding status or whether an employer’s health coverage exceeds the trigger for the tax. Some employers may decide simply to drop coverage of affected supplemental health products, rather than convert it to an after-tax basis. During this extended implementation period, Aflac will be assessing the impact of this tax; educating employers about the tax; and investigating ways to mitigate the impact of the tax. Having employees pay for the coverageincrease on an after-tax basis, would exempt affected supplemental health productsbeing another source of initial funding required for these products. The tax basis for reserves and DAC may also change the timing of tax payments in an accelerated or unfavorable direction. All of these effects will offset a favorable lower tax rate on income in later years. The overall impact is expected to be neutral on a pricing basis from these various effects.

The Tax Act changes became effective on January 1, 2018. However, because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the tax.
The Dodd-Frank Act, which was signed into law in 2010, created, among other things,period of enactment, during the period ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recorded a Financial Stability Oversight Council (the Council).net deferred tax liability reduction of $1.9 billion as of that date. In April 2012, the Council released afourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final rule describingvalues for the general process it will follow in determining whether to designate a nonbank financial company for supervision byCompany's deferred tax liability.For information on the Board of Governorseffects of the U.S. Federal Reserve System (the Board). The Council may designate by a two-thirds vote whether certain nonbank financial companies, including certain insurance companies and insurance holding companies, could pose a threatTax Act during the period ended December 31, 2018, see Note 10 of the Notes to the financial stability of the United States,Consolidated Financial Statements presented in which case such nonbank financial companies would become subject to prudential regulation by the Board. On April 3, 2013, the Board published a final rule that establishes the requirements for determining when a nonbank financial company is "predominantly engaged in financial activities" - a prerequisite for designation by the Council. Prudential regulation by the Board includes supervision of capital requirements, leverage limits, liquidity requirements and examinations. The Board may limit such company’s ability to enter into mergers, acquisitions and other business combination transactions, restrict its ability to offer financial products, require it to terminate one or more activities, or impose conditionsthis report. For information on the mannerconversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary, see General Business under Item 1, Business, in which it conducts activities. The Council

51this report.




designated two insurers in 2013 and an additional insurer in 2014 as a Systemically Important Financial Institution (SIFI). On December 18, 2014, the president signed the Insurance Capital Standards Clarification Act into law. This legislation will clarify the Board’s authority to apply insurance-based capital standards for insurance companies subject to federal supervision. Although Aflac is a nonbank financial company predominantly engaged in financial activities as defined in the Dodd-Frank Act we do not believe Aflac will be considered a company that poses a threat to the financial stability of the United States.

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations issued thereunder, in particular rules to require central clearing for certain types of derivatives, may have an impact on Aflac's derivative activity, including activity on behalf of Aflac Japan,Japan. In addition, in particular rules to require central clearing2015 and collateral for certain types of derivatives. In 2014, the five2016, six U.S. bankingfinancial regulators, andincluding the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) re-proposed for comment their, issued final rules regarding collateralthe exchange of initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) for uncleared swaps. Finalswaps that impose greater obligations on swap dealers regarding uncleared swaps with certain counterparties, such as Aflac. The requirements of such rules were issuedwith respect to VM, as well as similar regulations in Europe, became effective on March 1, 2017. Full compliance with respect to all counterparties was required by the five U.S. banking regulators onSeptember 1, 2017. The requirements of such rules with respect to IM are currently being phased in and will be fully implemented by September 1, 2020. In October 22, 2015 and byof 2017, the CFTC on December 16, 2015. Such rules mayand the European Commission each finalized comparability determinations that permit certain swap dealers who are subject to both regulatory margin regimes to take advantage of substituted compliance by complying with one set of margin requirements. The margin requirements are expected to result in increasedmore stringent collateral requirements orand to affect other aspects of Aflac's derivatives activity.

The Dodd-Frank Act also established a FIOFederal Insurance Office (FIO) under the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and of lines of business other than certain health insurance, certain long-term care insurance and crop insurance. Traditionally, U.S. insurance companies have been regulated primarily by state insurance departments. The FIO does not directly regulate the insurance industry, but under Dodd-Frank it has the power to preempt state insurance regulations that are inconsistent with international agreements reached by the federal government, subject to certain requirements and restrictions. The FIO and certain federal agencies must achieve consensus positions with the state insurance regulators when taking positions on insurance proposals by certain international forums. In December 2013, the FIO released a report entitled "How To Modernize And Improve The System Of Insurance Regulation In The United States." The report was required by the Dodd-Frank Act, and included 18 recommended areas of near-term reform for the states, including addressing capital adequacy and safety/soundness issues, reform of insurer resolution practices, and reform of marketplace regulation. The report also listed nine recommended areas for direct federal involvement in insurance regulation. Some of the recommendations outlined in the FIO report released in December 2013 have been implemented. Of the nine recommended areas for direct federal involvement in insurance regulation that are applicable to Aflac, the president signed theThe National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers Reform Act, signed into law in January 2015, which simplifies the agent and broker licensing process across state lines. The FIO has also engaged with the supervisory colleges to monitor financial stability and identify regulatory gaps for large national and internationally active insurers.


59


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

insurers. The processPresident and Congress have stated proposals to reform or repeal certain provisions of implementing the Dodd-Frank Act, is ongoing and continues to involve additional rulemaking from time to time. At the current time, it is not possible tosome of which have been implemented. The Company cannot predict with any degree of certainty what impact, if any, the Dodd-Frank Actsuch proposals will have on our U.S.Aflac's business, financial condition, or results of operations.


Insurance Guaranty Laws

Under state insurance guaranty association laws and similar laws in international jurisdictions, we areAflac is subject to assessments, based on the share of business we writeit writes in the relevant jurisdiction, for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants. In the United States, some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. The Company's policy is to accrue assessments when the entity for which the insolvency relates has met its state of domicile's statutory definition of insolvency, the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable and the related premium upon which the assessment is based is written. In most states, the definition is met with a declaration of financial insolvency by a court of competent jurisdiction.
Penn Treaty Network Company and its subsidiary American Network Insurance Company (collectively referred to as Penn Treaty) were placed in rehabilitation on January 6, 2009, and remained in rehabilitation as of December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, we were unable to estimate when or to what extent Penn Treaty will ultimately be declared insolvent, or the amount of the insolvency. As such, we have not established any accruals for guaranty fund assessments associated with Penn Treaty as of December 31, 2015.


Aflac U.S. Investments


The level of investment income is affected by available cash flow from operations, the timing of investing the cash flow, yields on new investments, and other factors. Aflac U.S. has invested primarily in investment grade corporate bonds. In 2015, as

As part of our normalthe Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac U.S. purchased $120 million of high yield corporate bondsinvests in fixed maturity investments and $118 million of middle marketgrowth assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships. Aflac U.S. has been investing in both publicly traded and privately originated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loan receivables, of which $53 million was unfunded. Asreceivables.

The following table details the investment purchases for Aflac U.S. as of December 31, 2015, we had commitments of $182 million to fund potential future loan originations related to the middle market loan investment program. These commitments are contingent upon the availability of middle market loans that meet our underwriting criteria. During the fourth quarter of 2015, we initiated a commercial mortgage loan investment program. As of December 31, 2015, we had $10 million in outstanding commitments to fund commercial mortgage loans, which had not yet been funded. These commitments are contingent on the final underwriting and due diligence to be performed, and may or may not be funded. See Notes 1 and 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding loans and loans receivables. We are planning to invest in additional asset classes such as31.

52



securitized assets and alternative asset classes, all of which we believe will improve diversification and enhance long-term returns in 2016 and thereafter.
(In millions) 2018 2017 
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Other fixed maturity securities $1,068
 $836
 
     Infrastructure debt 97
 60
 
  Equity securities 76
 56
 
  Other investments:     
     Transitional real estate loans 610
 249
 
     Commercial mortgage loans 163
 34
 
     Middle market loans 141
 199
 
     Limited partnerships 44
 16
 
        Total Aflac U.S. Purchases $2,199
 $1,450
 


Funds available for investment include cash flows from operations, investment income, and funds generated from maturities, redemptions, and other securities transactions. Purchases of securities from period to period are determined based on multiple objectives, including appropriate portfolio diversification, the relative value of a potential investment and availability of investment opportunities, liquidity, credit and other risk factors while adhering to ourthe Company's investment policy guidelines. Aflac U.S. purchased debt security investments at an aggregate acquisition cost of approximately $900 million in 2015, compared with $1.0 billion in 2014 and $1.2 billion in 2013. The following table presents the composition of debt security purchases by sector and other investment purchases for Aflac U.S., as a percentage of acquisition cost, for the years ended December 31.

Composition of Purchases by Sector
 2015 2014 2013 
Debt security purchases, at cost:      
Government and agencies1.4% .0% .2% 
Public utilities15.1
 16.5
 13.5
 
Other corporate70.2
 83.0
 86.3
 
Equity securities.0
 .5
 .0
 
Loan receivables13.3
 .0
 .0
 
 Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 
We use specific criteria to judge the credit quality of both existing and prospective investments. Furthermore, we use several methods to monitor these criteria, including credit rating services and internal credit analysis. The ratings referenced in the two tables below are based on the ratings designations provided by the major credit rating agencies (Moody's, S&P, and Fitch) or, if not rated, are determined based on our internal credit analysis of such securities. For investment-grade securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit agencies are not equivalent, we use the second lowest rating that is assigned. For a description of the ratings methodology that we use when a security is below investment grade or split-rated (one rating agency rates the security as investment grade while another rating agency rates the same security as below investment grade), see “Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Below-Investment-Grade and Split-Rated Securities” in the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A.

The distributions by credit rating of Aflac's U.S. purchases of debt securities for the years ended December 31, based on acquisition cost, were as follows:

Composition of Purchases by Credit Rating
 2015 2014 2013 
AAA2.2% .0% .6% 
AA4.4
 8.0
 5.1
 
A19.8
 50.8
 46.2
 
BBB59.3
 41.2
 48.1
 
BB or lower14.3
 .0
 .0
 
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 

The increase in purchases of BBB rated securities in 2015 was due primarily to the purchase of U.S. dollar-denominated corporate fixed-income publicly traded securities. The increase in purchases of BB or lower rated securities during 2015 was due to investment in high yield corporate bonds.


The following table presents the results of Aflac's U.S. investment yields for the years ended and as of December 31.
 2015 2014 2013 
New money yield4.45% 4.32% 4.06% 
Return on average invested assets, net of investment expenses5.19
 5.46
 5.70
 
Portfolio book yield, end of period5.77
 5.89
 6.01
 
 2018 2017 2016 
Total purchases for period (in millions) (1)
$2,155
 $1,434
 $1,144
 
New money yield (1), (2)
4.55% 4.49% 3.89% 
Return on average invested assets (3)
5.16
 5.07
 5.04
 
Portfolio book yield, end of period (1)
5.55% 5.52% 5.60% 

(1) Includes fixed maturity securities, loan receivables, equity securities, and excludes alternative investments in limited partnerships
(2) Reported on a gross yield basis; excludes investment expenses and external management fees
(3)Net of investment expenses, year-to-date number reflected on a quarterly average basis


5360




Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The increase in the Aflac U.S. new money yield in 20152018 was primarily due to wider credit spreads achieved in portfolio investing activities.increased allocations to higher yielding floating rate assets.

The following table presents the composition of total investments by sector, at cost or amortized cost, and cash for Aflac U.S. ($13.7 billion in 2015 and $12.7 billion in 2014) as of December 31.

Composition of Portfolio by Sector
 2015 2014 
Debt and perpetual securities, at amortized cost:    
Banks/financial institutions(1)
10.4% 12.0%
Government and agencies.7
 .7
 
Municipalities5.1
 5.6
 
Public utilities16.9
 17.0
 
Sovereign and supranational1.4
 1.6
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities.3
 .3
 
Other corporate52.0
 52.5
 
Total debt and perpetual securities86.8
 89.7
 
Other investments1.3
(2) 
.1
 
Cash and cash equivalents11.9
 10.2
 
Total investments and cash100.0% 100.0%
(1)Includes .3% and .4% of perpetual securities at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(2) Includes .9% of loan receivables


See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Credit Risk subsection of MD&A for more information regarding the sector concentrations of ourthe Company's investments.


CORPORATE AND OTHER

Total revenue for corporate and other increased to $339 million in 2018, compared with $272 million in 2017 and $277 million in 2016. This increase in 2018 was primarily driven by an increase in net investment income. The distributionsincrease in net investment income to $113 million in 2018, compared with $35 million in 2017, was driven by a $36 million pretax contribution from the Company’s corporate yen hedging program and increased income from over $600 million of debt and perpetual securities owned by Aflac U.S., by credit rating,invested assets transferred as of December 31 were as follows:

Composition of Portfolio by Credit Rating
   2015   2014 
  
Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
AAA 1.1%   1.0%   1.0%   .9% 
AA 7.8
   8.5
   8.1
   8.4
 
A 44.3
   46.2
   47.8
   48.8
 
BBB 42.1
   40.3
   39.8
   38.7
 
BB or lower 4.7
   4.0
   3.3
   3.2
 
Total 100.0%   100.0%   100.0%   100.0% 

The overall credit quality of Aflac U.S. investments remained high. At the end of 2015, 95.3% of Aflac U.S. debt and perpetual securities were rated investment grade, on an amortized cost basis. See Notes 3 and 5part of the Notes todrawdown of excess capital in the Consolidated Financial Statements andU.S. segment beginning in the Analysisfourth quarter of Financial Condition section of this MD&A for additional information on our investments.2017.

OTHER OPERATIONS


Corporate operatingadjusted expenses consist primarily of personnel compensation, benefits, reinsurance retrocession activities,benefits expense, and facilities expenses. Corporate expenses excluding investment and retrocession income, were $90$478 million in 2015, $912018, compared with $486 million in 20142017, and $79$516 million in 2013. Investment income included2016. The decline in reportedadjusted expenses in 2018 was considered insignificant. The decline in adjusted expenses from 2016 to 2017 was driven in large part by fluctuations in retrocession activity, which results in corresponding declines in total premiums.

Pretax adjusted earnings for corporate expenses was $22and other were a loss of $139 million in 2015, $132018, compared with a loss of $214 million in 20142017 and $11a loss of $239 million in 2013, and2016. The improvement in pretax adjusted earnings in 2018 was driven primarily by the increase in net retrocessioninvestment income was $7 million in 2015.

54as previously described.



ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
OurThe Company's financial condition has remained strong in the functional currencies of ourits operations. The yen/dollar exchange rate at the end of each period is used to translate yen-denominated balance sheet items to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes.
Investments

The following table demonstratesCompany’s investment strategy utilizes disciplined asset and liability management while seeking long-term risk-adjusted investment returns and the effectdelivery of stable income within regulatory and capital objectives, and preserving shareholder value. In attempting to optimally balance these objectives, the Company seeks to maintain on behalf of Aflac Japan a diversified portfolio of yen-denominated investment assets, U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio hedged back to yen and a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated assets. As part of the changeCompany's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac U.S. invests in the yen/dollar exchange rate by comparing select balance sheet items as reported at December 31, 2015, with the amounts that would have been reported had the exchange rate remained unchanged from December 31, 2014.fixed maturity investments and growth assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships. Aflac U.S. invests in both publicly traded and privately originated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loans.
Impact of Foreign Exchange on Balance Sheet Items

(In millions)  As  
Reported
 Exchange
Effect            
 Net of        
Exchange Effect          
Yen/dollar exchange rate(1)
 120.61
       120.55
 
Investments and cash $105,897
   $(32)   $105,929
 
Deferred policy acquisition costs 8,511
   (3)   8,514
 
Total assets 118,296
   (36)   118,332
 
Policy liabilities 87,631
   (39)   87,670
 
Total liabilities 100,588
   (41)   100,629
 
(1)The exchange rate at December 31, 2015, was 120.61 yen to one dollar, or .05% weaker than the December 31, 2014, exchange61
rate of 120.55.


Market RisksItem 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial InstrumentsCondition and Results of Operations

Our investment philosophy is to fulfill our fiduciary responsibility to invest assets in a prudent manner to meet the present and future needs of our policyholders' contractual obligations while maximizing the long-term financial return on assets consistent with the company goal of maximizing long-term shareholder value with defined risk appetites, limits, and maintaining adequate liquidity.


The following table details investment securitiesinvestments by segment as of December 31.
Investment Securities by Segment
  Aflac Japan Aflac U.S. 
(In millions)2015 2014 2015 2014 
Securities available for sale, at fair value:        
Fixed maturities$52,304
 $52,196
 $12,522
(1) 
$12,940
(1) 
Perpetual securities1,890
 2,609
 57
 60
 
Equity securities493
 23
 5
 5
 
Total available for sale54,687
 54,828
 12,584
 13,005
 
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost:        
Fixed maturities33,459
 34,242
 0
 0
 
Total held to maturity33,459
 34,242
 0
 0
 
Total investment securities$88,146
 $89,070
 $12,584
 $13,005
 
  Aflac Japan Aflac U.S. 
(In millions)2018 2017 2018 2017 
Available for sale, fixed maturity securities,
at fair value
(1)
$69,409
 $69,338
 $12,132
 $13,606

Held to maturity, fixed maturity securities,
at amortized cost
30,318
 31,430
 0
 0
 
Equity securities (1)
806
 868
 137
 92
 
Other investments:        
Transitional real estate loans3,621
 986
 756
 249
 
Commercial mortgage loans763
 767
 301
 141
 
Middle market loans1,144
 527
 334
 332
 
Policy loans219
 198
 13
 12
 
Short-term investments0
 57
 141
 0
 
Other333
 98
 63
 31
 
Total other investments6,080
 2,633
 1,608
 765
 
     Total investments106,613
 104,269
 13,877
 14,463
 
Cash and cash equivalents1,779
 636
 641
 1,011
 
              Total investments and cash (2)
$108,392
 $104,905
 $14,518
 $15,474
 
(1)Includes perpetual securities
(2)Excludes available-for-sale fixed-maturity securitiesinvestments and cash held by the Parent Company and other business segments of $523$3,333 in 20152018 and $3,280 in 2017.
$437
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $4.3 billion, or 3.4% of total investments and cash, as of December 31, 2018, compared with $3.5 billion, or 2.8%, at December 31, 2017. For a discussion of the factors affecting the Company's cash balance, see the Operating Activities, Investing Activities and Financing Activities subsections of this MD&A.

In 2017, Aflac U.S. became a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB). As a member, Aflac U.S. can access low-cost funding and also receive dividends on FHLB membership stock. Additional FHLB stock purchases are required based on funding activity with the FHLB. Aflac U.S. will be required to post acceptable forms of collateral for any funding from the FHLB. The FHLB stock purchased by the Company is classified as a restricted investment and is included in 2014."other investments" in the consolidated balance sheets.


Because we investFor additional information concerning the Company's investments, see Notes 3, 4, and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The ratings of the Company's securities referenced in the table below are based on the ratings designations provided by major Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs) (Moody's, S&P and Fitch) or, if not rated, are determined based on the Company's internal analysis of such securities. When the ratings issued by the rating agencies differ, the Company utilizes the second lowest rating when three or more rating agency ratings are available or the lowest rating when only two rating agency ratings are available.


62


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The distributions of debt securities the Company owns, by credit rating, as of December 31 were as follows:
Composition of Securities Portfolio by Credit Rating
   2018   2017 
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
AAA 1.0%   .9%   1.0%   .9% 
AA 3.9
   4.0
   3.9
   4.0
 
A 67.9
   69.9
   65.8
   66.9
 
BBB 23.2
   21.6
   24.0
   23.3
 
BB or lower 4.0
   3.6
   5.3
   4.9
 
Total 100.0%   100.0%   100.0%   100.0% 

As of December 31, 2018, the Company's direct and indirect exposure to securities in its investment portfolio that were guaranteed by third parties was immaterial both individually and in the aggregate.

The following table presents the 10 largest unrealized loss positions in the Company's portfolio as of December 31, 2018.
(In millions)Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized    
Loss    
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. B   $143
   $75
   $(68) 
AXA BBB   293
   242
   (51) 
Autostrade Per Litalia Spa BBB   180
   150
   (30) 
Baker Hughes Inc. A   122
   94
   (28) 
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse (KLP) BBB   135
   113
   (22) 
Abbvie Inc. BBB   177
   156
   (21) 
Transocean Inc. CCC   72
   52
   (20) 
Commonwealth Bank of Australia BBB   185
   166
   (19) 
Time Warner Cable Inc. AA   118
   99
   (19) 
United Technologies Corporation BBB   209
   192
   (17) 

Generally, declines in fair values can be a result of changes in interest rates, yen/dollar exchange rate, and changes in net spreads driven by a broad market move or a change in the issuer's underlying credit quality. As the Company believes these issues have the ability to continue making timely payments of principal and interest, the Company views these changes in fair value to be temporary and does not believe it is necessary to impair the carrying value of these securities. See the Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses section in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions of unrealized losses related to financial institutions and other corporate investments.
Below-Investment-Grade
The Company's portfolio of below-investment-grade securities includes debt securities purchased while the issuer was rated investment grade plus other loans and bonds purchased as part of an allocation to that segment of the market. The following is the Company's below-investment-grade exposure.


63


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Below-Investment-Grade Investments
  December 31, 2018 
(In millions)
Par
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Gain
(Loss)
 
Investcorp Capital Limited$383
 $383
 $372
 $(11) 
Republic of South Africa360
 360
 372
 12
 
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines270
 199
 224
 25
 
Navient Corp.210
 114
 119
 5
 
Republic of Tunisia189
 111
 127
 16
 
Telecom Italia SpA180
 180
 208
 28
 
Barclays Bank PLC180
 111
 147
 36
 
Transnet135
 135
 135
 0
 
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc.124
 143
 75
 (68) 
IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG117
 50
 94
 44
 
Arconic Inc.100
 84
 92
 8
 
Noble Holdings International Ltd.92
 57
 57
 0
 
EMC Corp.80
 80
 68
 (12) 
Generalitat de Catalunya72
 26
 64
 38
 
Teck Resources Ltd.70
 76
 67
 (9) 
Teva Pharmaceuticals68
 66
 58
 (8) 
Transocean Inc.68
 72
 52
 (20) 
Petrobras International Finance Company65
 65
 63
 (2) 
National Gas Co. Trinidad and Tobago52
 50
 50
 0
 
CF Industries Inc.50
 49
 47
 (2) 
Other Issuers (below $50 million in par value)232
 222
 214
 (8) 
          Subtotal (1)
3,097
 2,633
 2,705
 72
 
Senior secured bank loans1,093
 1,108
 1,061
 (47) 
High yield corporate bonds519
 513
 487
 (26) 
Middle market loans, net of reserves (2)
1,497
 1,478
 1,475
 (3) 
          Grand Total$6,206
 $5,732
 $5,728
 $(4) 
(1) Securities initially purchased as investment grade, but have subsequently been downgraded to below investment grade
(2) Middle market loans are carried at amortized cost

The Company invests in senior secured bank loans and middle market loans primarily to U.S. corporate borrowers, most of which have below-investment-grade ratings. The objectives of these programs include enhancing the yield on invested assets, achieving further diversification of credit risk, and mitigating the risk of rising interest rates and hedge costs through the acquisition of floating rate assets.

The Company maintains an allocation to higher yielding corporate bonds within the Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. portfolios. Most of these securities were rated below-investment-grade at the time of purchase, but the Company also purchased several that were rated investment grade which, because of market pricing, offer yields commensurate with below-investment-grade risk profiles. The objective of this allocation was to enhance the Company's yield on invested assets and further diversify credit risk. All investments must have a minimum rating of low BB using the Company's above described rating methodology and are managed by the Company's internal credit portfolio management team.

In January 2019, PG&E Corporation (PG&E) and its operating subsidiary, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E Utility) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in fixed-maturitythe Northern District of California. At December 31, 2018, debt of the PG&E utility was rated investment grade and the Company's net exposure was $126 million (amortized cost), all of which was issued by PG&E utility. Subsequently, the rating on this exposure migrated to below investment grade.


64


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Oil and Gas Exposure

The following tables show the breakout of our exposure to the oil and gas industry as of December 31.

 2018 
 Cost or Gross Gross    
 Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
(In millions)Cost Gains Losses Value
Securities available for sale,
  carried at fair value:
               
   Fixed maturities:               
         Independent exploration and production $813
   $72
   $36
   $849
 
         Integrated energy 426
   19
   30
   415
 
         Midstream 1,059
   91
   38
   1,112
 
         Oil field services 725
   9
   154
   580
 
         Refiners 346
   4
   20
   330
 
         Government owned - energy related 855
   167
   6
   1,016
 
         Natural gas utilities 472
   49
   6
   515
 
            Total securities available for sale 4,696
   411
   290
   4,817
 
Securities held to maturity,
  carried at amortized cost:
               
   Fixed maturities:               
         Integrated energy 234
   5
   0
   239
 
         Government owned - energy related 270
   0
   8
   262
 
         Natural gas utilities 360
   34
   0
   394
 
            Total securities held to maturity 864
   39
   8
   895
 
Equity Securities:               
         Independent exploration and production 2
   0
   0
   2
 
         Integrated energy 8
   0
   0
   8
 
         Oil field services 1
   0
   0
   1
 
         Refiners 4
   0
   0
   4
 
            Total equity securities 15
   0
   0
   15
 
                Total securities $5,575
   $450
   $298
   $5,727
 

Securities by Type of Issuance
The Company has investments in both publicly and privately issued securities. The Company's ability to sell either type of security is a function of overall market liquidity which is impacted by, among other things, the amount of outstanding securities ourof a particular issuer or issuance, trading history of the issue or issuer, overall market conditions, and idiosyncratic events affecting the specific issue or issuer.

The following table details investment securities by type of issuance as of December 31.

65


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Investment Securities by Type of Issuance
   2018   2017 
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair   
Value   
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair  
Value  
Publicly issued securities:               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 $83,482
   $93,255
   $81,454
   $93,025
 
Equity securities (1)
 936
   936
   831
   1,006
 
      Total publicly issued 84,418
   94,191
   82,285
   94,031
 
Privately issued securities: (2)
               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 23,692
   26,362
   25,108
   29,360
 
Equity securities (1)
 51
   51
   15
   17
 
      Total privately issued 23,743
   26,413
   25,123
   29,377
 
      Total investment securities $108,161
   $120,604
   $107,408
   $123,408
 
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2) Includes Rule 144A securities

The Company held $1,202 million and $1,789 million of perpetual securities at fair value ($1,201 million and $1,462 million at amortized cost) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The perpetual securities the Company holds were largely issued by banks that are systemically important to the financial markets of the sovereign country of domicile of the issuer. Generally, the Company believes regulatory changes made in the banking industry following the Global Financial Crisis and the European Sovereign Crisis, including increased capital and liquidity requirements and a reduction of business risk, have improved overall bank creditworthiness. However, bank capital securities may be subject to varying bail-in/resolution regimes in their home countries, which may include conversion or write-down provisions when bank regulators determine that the institution has reached the point of non-viability. Such actions could result in lower cash flows and ratings downgrades of the affected securities, which in turn could result in a reduction of fair value of the securities and increase the Company’s regulatory capital requirements. These factors are an integral part of the Company's credit review process.

The following table details the Company's privately issued investment securities as of December 31.
Privately Issued Securities
(Amortized cost, in millions)2018 2017 
Privately issued securities as a percentage of total investment securities22.0% 23.4% 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan$20,966
 $22,354
 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan as a percentage of total
investment securities
19.4% 20.8% 
Reverse-Dual Currency Securities(1)
(Amortized cost, in millions)2018 2017 
Privately issued reverse-dual currency securities$5,120
 $5,669
 
Publicly issued collateral structured as reverse-dual currency securities1,657
 1,390
 
Total reverse-dual currency securities$6,777
 $7,059
 
Reverse-dual currency securities as a percentage of total investment
securities
6.3% 6.6% 
(1)Principal payments in yen and interest payments in dollars

Aflac Japan has a portfolio of privately issued securities to better match liability characteristics and secure higher yields than those available on Japanese government or other public corporate bonds.Aflac Japan’s investments in yen-denominated privately issued securities consist primarily of non-Japanese issuers, are rated investment grade at purchase and have longer maturities, thereby allowing the Company to improve asset/liability matching and overall investment returns. These securities are generally either privately negotiated arrangements or issued under medium-term note programs and have standard documentation commensurate with credit ratings of the issuer, except when internal credit analysis indicates that additional protective and/or event-risk covenants were required. Many of these investments

66


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

have protective covenants appropriate to the specific investment. These may include a prohibition of certain activities by the borrower, maintenance of certain financial measures, and specific conditions impacting the payment of the Company's notes.

Hedging Activities

The Company uses derivative contracts to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. Derivative hedges are designed to reduce risk on an economic basis while minimizing the impact on financial results. The Company’s derivative hedge programs vary depending on the type of risk being hedged.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Hedge Program
The Company has deployed the following hedging strategies to mitigate exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk:
1.
Aflac Japan hedges U.S. dollar-denominated investments back to yen (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
2.
Aflac Japan maintains certain unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, which serve as an economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
3.
The Parent Company designates yen-denominated liabilities (notes payable and loans) as non-derivative hedging instruments and designates certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedges of the Company’s net investment in Aflac Japan (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).
4.
The Parent Company enters into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency exchange rate risk related to dividend payments by its subsidiary, Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).

Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program
Aflac Japan buys U.S. dollar-denominated investments, typically corporate bonds, and hedges them back to yen with foreign currency forwards and options to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk. This economically creates yen assets that match yen liabilities during the life of the derivative and provides liquidity and capital relief. The currency risk being hedged is generally based on fair value of hedged investments. The following table summarizes the U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan as of December 31.
 2018 2017
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale securities:     
  Fixed maturity securities (excluding bank loans) (1)
$17,101
$17,003
 $17,972
$19,314
  Fixed maturity securities - bank loans (floating rate)1,296
1,238
 1,936
1,865
  Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
Equity securities (1), (2)
177
177
 147
173
Other investments:     
  Transitional real estate loans (floating rate)3,621
3,625
 986
984
  Commercial mortgage loans763
736
 767
753
  Middle market loans (floating rate)1,144
1,146
 527
530
  Alternative investments333
333
 97
97
      Total U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan$26,114
$26,527
 $24,082
$26,265
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. for the adoption of accounting guidance related to financial instruments effective January 1, 2018.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and $9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the U.S. dollar-denominated investments. The fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

67


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Foreign exchange derivatives used for hedging are periodically settled, which results in cash receipt or payment at maturity or early termination. The Company had net cash settlements of $272 million, $(747) million and $1.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, associated with the currency derivatives used for hedging Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments.

The following table presents metrics related to Aflac Japan hedge costs as of December 31.

Aflac Japan Hedge Cost Metrics(1)
 2018 2017 2016
FX forward notional at end of period (in billions of dollars)(2)
9.9 9.3 11.8
Weighted average original tenor (in months)(3)
30.4 33.1 20.6
Weighted average remaining tenor (in months)(4)
21.4 27.7 18.5
Annualized amortized hedge costs (in basis points)(5)
241 211 149
Amortized hedge costs for period (in millions of dollars)(236) (228) (186)
(1) See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of amortized hedge costs.
(2) Notional is reported net of any offsetting positions
(3) Tenor based on derivative's original execution date to settlement date
(4) Tenor based on period reporting date to settlement date
(5) Based on annualized amortized hedge costs divided by average FX forward notional for the period

Parent Company's Foreign Currency Hedge Program

The Company has designated certain yen-denominated liabilities and foreign currency forwards and options of the Parent Company as accounting hedges of its net investment in Aflac Japan. The Company's consolidated yen-denominated net asset position was partially hedged at $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2018, with hedging instruments comprised completely of yen-denominated debt, compared with a hedge of $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2017, with hedging instruments comprised of $1.4 billion of yen-denominated debt and $.4 billion of foreign currency forwards and options.

The Company makes its accounting designation of net investment hedge at the beginning of each quarter. If the total of the designated Parent Company non-derivative and derivative notional is equal to or less than the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective, and the currency exchange effect on the yen-denominated liabilities and the change in estimated fair value of the derivatives are reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. The Company's net investment hedge was effective during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In order to economically mitigate risks associated with the enterprise-wide exposure to the yen and the level and volatility of hedge costs, the Parent Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts. By buying U.S. dollars and selling yen, the Parent Company is effectively lowering its overall economic exposure to the yen, while Aflac Japan's U.S dollar exposure remains reduced as a result of Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated hedge program that synthetically creates yen assets. Among other objectives, this strategy is intended to reduce the enterprise-wide hedge costs. In 2018, the portion of the enterprise-wide hedge costs reduction contributed by this strategy was $36 million. This activity is reported in the Corporate and other segment. As this program evolves, the Company will continue to evaluate the program’s efficacy, including third-party review.

Interest Rate Risk Hedge Program

To mitigate the risk of investment income volatility, the Company economically hedges interest rate fluctuations for certain variable-rate investments. To manage interest rate risk associated with its U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan, the Company also utilizes interest rate swaptions.

For additional discussion of the risks associated with the foreign currency exposure refer to the Currency Risk section in Item 1A, specifically to the Risk Factors titled “The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate“ and “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity." For discussion of the Company’s view on the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan, refer to the Investments subsection within Item 1, Business.


68


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's hedging activities.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The following table presents deferred policy acquisition costs by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 % Change     
Aflac Japan$6,384
 $6,150
 3.8%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.3,491
 3,355
 4.1
 
Total$9,875
 $9,505
 3.9% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s deferred policy acquisition costs increased 2.0% in yen during the year ended December 31, 2018.

See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's deferred policy acquisition costs.

Policy Liabilities
The following table presents policy liabilities by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 % Change       
Aflac Japan$92,791
 $89,132
 4.1%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.10,981
 10,625
 3.4
 
Other183
 138
 32.6
 
Intercompany eliminations (2)
(767) (748) 2.5
 
Total$103,188
 $99,147
 4.1% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s policy liabilities increased 2.3% in yen during the year ended December 31, 2018.
(2) Elimination entry necessary due to recapture of a portion of policy liabilities ceded externally, as a result of the reinsurance retrocession transaction as described in Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's policy liabilities.

Notes Payable
Notes payable totaled $5.8 billion at December 31, 2018, compared with $5.3 billion at December 31, 2017.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semiannually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's notes payable.


69


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Benefit Plans
Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. have various benefit plans. For additional information on the Company's Japanese and U.S. plans, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Policyholder Protection
Policyholder Protection Corporation

The Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. Legislation enacted regarding the framework of the Life Insurance Policyholder Protection Corporation (LIPPC) included government fiscal measures supporting the LIPPC. On March 30, 2012, the Diet approved legislation to enhance the stability of the LIPPC by extending the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2017. On November 25, 2016, Japan's Diet passed legislation that again extends the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2022. Effective April 2014, the annual LIPPC contribution amount for the total life industry was lowered from 40 billion yen to 33 billion yen.

Guaranty Fund Assessments

Under U.S. state guaranty association laws, certain insurance companies can be assessed (up to prescribed limits) for certain obligations to the policyholders and claimants of impaired or insolvent insurance companies that write the same line or similar lines of business. The amount of the guaranty fund assessment that an insurer is assessed is based on its proportionate share of premiums in that state.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has estimated and recognized the impact of its share of guaranty fund assessments resulting from the liquidation of a long-term care insurer. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the assessment.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had no material letters of credit, standby letters of credit, guarantees or standby repurchase obligations. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on material unconditional purchase obligations that are not recorded on the Company's balance sheet.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. provide the primary sources of liquidity to the Parent Company through dividends and management fees. The following table presents the amounts provided for the years ended December 31.
Liquidity Provided by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. to Parent Company
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Dividends declared or paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.$1,817

$2,590
(1) 
$2,000
 
Management fees paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.204
 291
 260
 
(1) Includes securities of $622 at fair value which had a value of $656 at amortized cost

The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to prior years due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018.

The primary uses of cash by the Parent Company are shareholder dividends, the repurchase of its common stock and interest on its outstanding indebtedness and operating expenses.

At the end of September 2018, the Company announced a change in its internal dividend policy which allows the
Company to increase the proportion of regulatory earnings transferred from Aflac U.S. and Aflac Japan to the Parent
Company. The Company intends to maintain higher than historical levels of capital and liquidity at the Parent Company with the goals of addressing the Company’s hedge costs and related potential need for collateral and mitigating against long-term weakening of the Japanese yen. Further, the Company plans to continue to maintain a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar based investments at Aflac Japan and consider whether the amount of such investments should be increased

70


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

or decreased relative to the Company’s view of economic equity surplus in Aflac Japan in light of potentially rising hedge costs and other factors. See Item 2., Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under “Forward-Looking Information,” for a description of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the Company in regards to its capital management intentions.

The Parent Company accesses debt security markets to provide additional sources of capital. In September 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC that allows the Company to issue an indefinite amount of debt securities, in one or more series, from time to time until September 2021. In August 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration with Japanese regulatory authorities that allows the Parent Company to conduct public offerings of bonds in Japan, including yen-denominated Samurai notes, up to 200 billion yen or its equivalent through August 2020. The shelf registration statement is for possible public offerings in Japan, but the bonds issued under the shelf may be transferred by the bondholders to U.S. persons in compliance with U.S. law. The Company believes outside sources for additional debt and equity capital, if needed, will continue to be available. For additional information, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The principal sources of cash for the Company's insurance operations are premiums and investment income. The primary uses of cash by the Company's insurance operations are investments, policy claims, commissions, operating expenses, income taxes and payments to the Parent Company for management fees and dividends. Both the sources and uses of cash are reasonably predictable.

When making an investment decision, the Company's first consideration is based on product needs. The Company's investment objectives provide for liquidity through the purchase of investment-grade debt securities. These objectives also take into account duration matching, and because of the long-term nature of the Company's business, the Company has adequate time to react to changing cash flow needs.

As a result of policyholder aging, claims payments are expected to gradually increase over the life of a policy. Therefore, future policy benefit reserves are accumulated in the early years of a policy and are designed to help fund future claims payments. The Company expects its future cash flows from premiums and its investment portfolio to be sufficient to meet its cash needs for benefits and expenses.

As of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company and Aflac had four lines of credit with third parties as well as two intercompany lines of credit. For additional information on the Company's lines of credit, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As part of the FHLB financing arrangement as discussed previously in the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A, Aflac U.S. borrowed and repaid $86 million during 2018.

The Company's financial statements convey its financing arrangements during the periods presented. The Company has not engaged in material intra-period short-term financings during the periods presented that are not otherwise reported in its balance sheet or disclosed therein. The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2018. The Company has not entered into transactions involving the transfer of financial assets with an obligation to repurchase financial assets that have been accounted for as a sale under applicable accounting standards, including securities lending transactions. See Notes 1, 3, and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Company's securities lending and derivative activities. With the exception of disclosed activities in those referenced footnotes and the Risk Factors entitled, "The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate" and "Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity," the Company does not have a known trend, demand, commitment, event or uncertainty that would reasonably result in its liquidity increasing or decreasing by a material amount. As of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company had $1.0 billion as a capital reserve and an additional $1.0 billion of contingent liquidity in order to mitigate liquidity risk of derivative positions that are reducing enterprise-wide foreign currency exposure. The Company's cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted cash on hand, money market instruments, and other debt instruments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased, all of which has minimal market, settlement or other risk exposure.

The following table presents the estimated payments by period of the Company's major contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018. The Company translated its yen-denominated obligations using the December 31, 2018, exchange rate. Actual future payments as reported in dollars will fluctuate with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate.

71


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Distribution of Payments by Period
(In millions)
Total
Liability
(1)
 Total
Payments
 Less
Than
One Year
 
One to
Three Years
 Four to
Five Years
 After
Five Years
Future policy benefits liability (Note 7)(2)
$86,368
  $251,577
 $8,980
 $17,817
 $17,807
 $206,973
Unpaid policy claims liability (Note 7)(3)
4,584
  4,584
 2,950
 951
 387
 296
Other policyholders' funds (Note 7)(3)
7,146
 9,920
 321
 360
 581
 8,658
Long-term debt – principal (Note 9)
5,765
  5,813
 0
 45
 1,275
 4,493
Long-term debt – interest (Note 9)
37
  2,086
 175
 327
 284
 1,300
Cash collateral on loaned securities (Note 3)
1,052
 1,052
 1,052
 0
 0
 0
Operating service agreements (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
553
 165
 289
 99
 0
Operating lease obligations (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
202
 63
 82
 39
 18
Capitalized lease obligations (Note 9)
13
  13
 5
 5
 2
 1
Total contractual obligations$104,965
  $275,800
 $13,711
 $19,876
 $20,474
 $221,739
Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of $15 have been excluded from the tabular disclosure above because the timing of cash payment is not reasonably estimable.
(1)Liability amounts are those reported on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018.
(2)The estimated payments due by period reflect future estimated cash payments to be made to policyholders and others for future policy benefits. These projected cash outflows are based on assumptions for future policy persistency, mortality, morbidity, and other assumptions comparable with the Company's experience, consider future premium receipts on current policies in force, and assume market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs. These cash outflows are undiscounted with respect to interest and, as a result, the sum of the cash outflows shown for all years in the table of $251,577 exceeds the corresponding liability amount of $86,368. The Company has made significant assumptions to determine the future estimated cash outflows related to the underlying policies and contracts. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, actual cash outflow amounts and timing will differ, possibly materially, from these estimates.
(3)Includes assumptions as to the timing of policyholders reporting claims for prior periods and the amount of those claims. Actual amounts and timing of unpaid policy claims payments may differ significantly from the estimates above.
(4)Not applicable

For more information on the Company's major contractual obligations, see the applicable Note in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as indicated in the line items in the table above.

Consolidated Cash Flows

The Company translates cash flows for Aflac Japan's yen-denominated items into U.S. dollars using weighted-average exchange rates. In years when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars causes more dollars to be reported.

The following table summarizes consolidated cash flows by activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Operating activities$6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 
Investing activities(3,582) (5,431) (3,855) 
Financing activities(1,616) (2,065) (1,619) 
Exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents30
 0
 (4) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents$846
 $(1,368) $509
 

Operating Activities

Consolidated cash flow from operations decreased 1.9% in 2018, compared with 2017. The following table summarizes operating cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$4,916
 $4,959
 $4,605
 
Aflac U.S. and other operations1,098
 1,169
 1,382
 
Total$6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 


72


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Investing Activities

Operating cash flow is primarily used to purchase investments to meet future policy obligations. The following table summarizes investing cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$(2,938) $(4,504) $(3,075) 
Aflac U.S. and other operations(644) (927) (780) 
Total$(3,582) $(5,431) $(3,855) 

Prudent portfolio management dictates that the Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. Currently, when the Company's fixed maturity securities mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. However, the long-term nature of the Company's business and its strong cash flows provide the Company with the ability to minimize the effect of mismatched durations and/or yields identified by various asset adequacy analyses. From time to time or when market opportunities arise, the Company disposes of selected fixed maturity securities that are available for sale to improve the duration matching of assets and liabilities, improve future investment yields, and/or re-balance its portfolio. As a result, dispositions before maturity can vary significantly from year to year.

As part of its overall corporate strategy, the Company announced in September 2018 that it intends to increase its original investment in the Aflac Ventures Fund from $100 million over three years to $250 million over three to four years, as opportunities emerge. These investments are included in equity securities or the other investments line in the consolidated balance sheets. The Aflac Ventures Fund is a subsidiary of Aflac Corporate Ventures which is reported in the "Corporate and other" business segment. The central mission of Aflac Corporate Ventures is to support the organic growth and business development needs of Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. with emphasis on digital applications designed to improve the customer experience, gain efficiencies, and develop new markets in an effort to enhance and defend long-term shareholder value.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on certain investment commitments.

Financing Activities

Consolidated cash used by financing activities was $1.6 billion in 2018, $2.1 billion in 2017 and $1.6 billion in 2016.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of its senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In January 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of .932% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 10-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

73


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


In February 2017, the Parent Company extinguished $650 million of 2.65% senior notes upon their maturity.

In October 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of subordinated debentures through a U.S. public debt offering. The debentures bear interest at an initial rate of 2.108% per annum through October 22, 2027, or earlier redemption. Thereafter, the rate of the interest of the debentures will be reset every five years at a rate of interest equal to the then-current JPY 5-year Swap Offered Rate plus 205 basis points. The debentures are payable semi-annually in arrears and have a 30-year maturity. The debentures are redeemable (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax events or certain rating agency events, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the debentures or (ii) in 10 years, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption. In November 2017, the Parent Company used a portion of net proceeds from the debenture offering to redeem $500 million of the Parent Company's 5.50% subordinated debentures due 2052. The pretax non-operating expense due to the early redemption of these notes was $13 million.

In September 2016, the Parent Company issued two series of senior notes totaling $700 million through a U.S. public debt offering. The first series, which totaled $300 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.875% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 10-year maturity. The second series, which totaled $400 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 30-year maturity.

In September 2016, the Parent Company entered into two series of senior unsecured term loan facilities totaling 30.0 billion yen. The first series, which totaled 5.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to the TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .20% and .60%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second series, which totaled 25.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .35% and .75%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In December 2016, the Parent Company completed a tender offer in which it extinguished $176 million principal of its 6.90% senior notes due 2039 and $193 million principal of its 6.45% senior notes due 2040. The pretax non-operating loss due to the early redemption of these notes was $137 million ($89 million after-tax, or $.21 per diluted share).

In September 2016, the Parent Company extinguished 8.0 billion yen of 2.26% fixed rate Uridashi notes upon their maturity and in July 2016, the Parent Company extinguished 15.8 billion yen of 1.84% fixed rate Samurai notes upon their maturity.

See Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the debt issuances discussed above.

See the preceding discussion in this Capital Resources and Liquidity section of MD&A for details and any outstanding balances as of December 31, 2018 for the Company's lines of credit and FHLB financing arrangement.

The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2018.

Cash returned to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases was $2.1 billion in 2018, compared with $2.0 billion in 2017 and $2.1 billion in 2016.

The following tables present a summary of treasury stock activity during the years ended December 31.
Treasury Stock Purchased
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016 
Treasury stock purchases$1,301
 $1,351
 $1,422
 
Number of shares purchased:      
Open market28,949
 35,510
 43,236
 
Other392
 1,018
 660
 
   Total shares purchased29,341
 36,528
 43,896
 

74


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Treasury Stock Issued
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016 
Stock issued from treasury:      
   Cash financing$58
 $33
 $46
 
   Noncash financing17
 59
 61
 
   Total stock issued from treasury$75
 $92
 $107
 
Number of shares issued1,939
 2,554
 3,704
 

Under share repurchase authorizations from the Company's board of directors, the Company purchased 28.9 million shares of its common stock in the open market in 2018, compared with 35.5 million shares in 2017 and 43.2 million shares in 2016. As of December 31, 2018, a remaining balance of 69.0 million shares of the Company's common stock was available for purchase under share repurchase authorizations by its board of directors. The Company currently plans to repurchase $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion of its common stock in 2019, assuming stable capital conditions and absent compelling alternatives. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Cash dividends paid to shareholders in 2018 of $1.04 per share increased 19.5% over 2017. The 2017 dividend paid of $.87 per share increased 4.8% over 2016. The following table presents the dividend activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Dividends paid in cash$793
 $661
 $658
 
Dividends through issuance of treasury shares8
 29
 27
 
Total dividends to shareholders$801
 $690
 $685
 

In January 2019, the board of directors announced a 3.8% increase in the quarterly cash dividend, effective with the first quarter of 2019. The first quarter 2019 cash dividend of $.27 per share is payable on March 1, 2019, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 20, 2019.

Regulatory Restrictions

Aflac and CAIC are domiciled in Nebraska and are subject to its regulations. Subsequent to the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, Aflac Japan is domiciled in Japan and subject to local regulations. See further discussion
below. The Nebraska Department of Insurance imposes certain limitations and restrictions on payments of dividends, management fees, loans and advances to the Parent Company. Under Nebraska insurance law, prior approval of the Nebraska Department of Insurance is required for dividend distributions that exceed the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. In addition, the Nebraska insurance department must approve service arrangements and other transactions within the affiliated group of companies. These regulatory limitations are not expected to affect the level of management fees or dividends paid to the Parent Company. (See below for discussion of restrictions imposed by Japanese insurance regulators.) A life insurance company’s statutory capital and surplus is determined according to rules prescribed by the NAIC, as modified by the insurance department in the insurance company’s state of domicile. Statutory accounting rules are different from U.S. GAAP and are intended to emphasize policyholder protection and company solvency. Similar laws apply in New York, the domiciliary jurisdiction of Aflac's New York insurance subsidiary. As of December 2016, CAIC was redomiciled from South Carolina to Nebraska.

The continued long-term growth of the Company's business may require increases in the statutory capital and surplus of its insurance operations. Aflac’s insurance operations may secure additional statutory capital through various sources, such as internally generated statutory earnings, capital contributions by the Parent Company from funds generated through debt or equity offerings, or reinsurance transactions. The NAIC’s RBC formula is used by insurance regulators to help identify inadequately capitalized insurance companies. The RBC formula quantifies insurance risk, business risk, asset risk and interest rate risk by weighing the types and mixtures of risks inherent in the insurer’s operations.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 560%. The 2018 RBC as filed is lower than Aflac U.S. standalone RBC due to the inclusion of Aflac Japan for the first quarter of 2018. The RBC charge reflects the business risk without any total adjusted capital (TAC). At December 31, 2017, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 831%, which included Aflac Japan. Aflac's RBC ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position, even reflecting the full negative impact of the U.S. Tax Act, which was fully adopted in 2018. This reduction occurs as a result of

75


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

writing down deferred tax assets and the increase in required capital due to the reduction in tax rates. However, Aflac expects to recover from this negative impact over a period of three to five years through additional statutory income, assuming that the additional income is fully retained. As of December 31, 2018, Aflac's total adjusted capital of $2.7 billion exceeded the company action level required capital and surplus of $.5 billion by $2.2 billion.

The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid to the Parent Company by Aflac without prior approval of Nebraska's director of insurance is the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. Dividends declared by Aflac during 2019 in excess of $1.3 billion would be considered extraordinary and require such approval. Following the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, the Company used extraordinary dividends as needed to actively manage to appropriate RBC levels that are lower yet sufficient to maintain ratings and support prudent capital management. See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the impact of permitted practices by the Nebraska Department of Insurance on the Company's statutory capital and surplus.

The NAIC considers its Solvency Modernization Initiative (SMI) process relating to updating the U.S. insurance solvency regulation framework to be ongoing. The SMI has focused on key issues such as capital requirements, governance and risk management, group supervision, reinsurance, statutory accounting and financial reporting matters. Many of these key issues have been finalized and/or are near completion; however, the NAIC still has some ongoing initiatives related to SMI, such as monitoring the international efforts on group capital requirements as well as RBC.In addition, the NAIC is also considering changes to investment risk factors. Any negative developments by the NAIC in these areas could result in increased capital requirements for the Company.

Aflac is subject to the NAIC’s Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA), effective January 1, 2015. Through the ORSA requirements, Aflac is expected to regularly, no less than annually, conduct an ORSA to assess the adequacy of its risk management framework, and its current and estimated projected future solvency position; internally document the process and results of the assessment; and provide a confidential high-level ORSA Summary Report annually to the lead state commissioner if the insurer is a member of an insurance group. In November 2018, Aflac filed its ORSA report with the Nebraska Department of Insurance.

In addition to limitations and restrictions imposed by U.S. insurance regulators, after the Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, the new Japan subsidiary is required to meet certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law in order to provide dividends to the Parent Company. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at the Japan subsidiary is basically defined as retained earnings excluding capital reserves, which represent equity generated by capital profits that are statutorily required in Japan, less net after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities based on the previous fiscal year-end. These dividend capacity requirements are generally aligned with the solvency margin ratio (SMR). Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) maintains its own solvency standard which is quantified through the SMR. Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread, and foreign exchange rate changes, therefore the Company continues to evaluate alternatives for reducing this sensitivity. In the event of a rapid change in market risk conditions causing SMR to decline, the Company has two senior unsecured revolving credit facilities in the amounts of 100 billion yen and 55 billion yen, respectively, and a committed reinsurance facility in the amount of approximately 110 billion yen as a capital contingency plan. Additionally, the Company could take action to enter into derivatives on unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments with foreign currency options or forwards. (See Notes 8 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.)

The Company has already undertaken various measures to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR. For example, the Company employs policy reserve matching (PRM) investment strategies, which is a Japan-specific accounting treatment that reduces SMR interest rate sensitivity since PRM-designated investments are carried at amortized cost consistent with corresponding liabilities. In order for a PRM-designated asset to be held at amortized cost, there are certain criteria that must be maintained. The primary criteria relates to maintaining the duration of designated assets and liabilities within a specified tolerance range. If the duration difference is not maintained within the specified range without rebalancing, then a certain portion of the assets must be re-classified as available for sale and held at fair value with any associated unrealized gain or loss recorded in surplus. To rebalance, assets may need to be sold in order to maintain the duration with the specified range, resulting in realizing a gain or loss from the sale. For U.S. GAAP, PRM investments are categorized as available for sale. The Company also uses foreign currency derivatives to hedge a portion of its U.S. dollar-denominated investments.(See Notes 3, 4 and 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's investment strategies, hedging activities, and reinsurance, respectively.)

Aflac's SMR ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position. As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan's SMR was 965%, compared with 1,064% at December 31, 2017. As part of the conversion of Aflac Japan from a

76


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018, the Company experienced an accounting-driven decline in the SMR of approximately 130 points, compared with the SMR as of December 31, 2017. The Company expects to be able to pay dividends out of certain accounts, thus restoring this accounting impact over an estimated three-year period.

The FSA has been conducting field testing with the insurance industry concerning the introduction of an economic value-based solvency regime. The field testing will assist the FSA in determining if an economic value-based solvency regime in Japan will be appropriate for the insurance industry.

Payments are made from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company for management fees, allocated expenses and remittances of earnings. Prior to the Aflac Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan paid allocated expenses and profit remittances to Aflac U.S. The following table details Aflac Japan remittances for the years ended December 31.

Aflac Japan Remittances
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan management fees paid to Parent Company$136
 $93
 $79
 
Expenses allocated to Aflac Japan (in dollars)24
 109
 106
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in dollars)808
 1,150
 1,286
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in yen)89.7
 129.3
 138.5
 

The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to prior years due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. See the preceding Hedging Activities subsection of this MD&A for discussion of Parent Company hedging of yen profit remittances. For additional information on regulatory restrictions on dividends, profit remittances and other transfers, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other

For information regarding commitments and contingent liabilities, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Additional Information

Investors should note that the Company announces material financial information in its SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls. In accordance with SEC guidance, the Company may also use the Investor Relations section of the Company's website (http://investors.aflac.com) to communicate with investors about the Company. It is possible that the financial and other information the Company posts there could be deemed to be material information. The information on the Company's website is not part of this document.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed primarily to threethe following types of market risks: currency risk, interest rate risk, and credit risk. In 2015, we increased our investment allocation to yen-denominated equity securities, thereby increasing our exposure torisk and equity risk. Fluctuations in these factors could impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The Company regularly monitors its market risks and uses a variety of strategies to manage its exposure

to these market risks.

Currency Risk

Aflac Japan

The functional currency of Aflac Japan's insurance operations is the Japanese yen. AllAflac Japan’s premiums and a significant portion of Aflac Japan's premiums,its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and commissionsmost expenses are received or paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, asto support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, most of its other expenses.however, translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Most of Aflac Japan's cash and liabilities are yen-denominated.

77


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


As discussed above in the Investment subsection of Item 1, Business, the Company engages in hedging activities to mitigate certain currency risks from holding U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan. However, this hedging program in turn poses a countervailing long-term risk of loss on hedging currency derivatives under the long-term scenario of weakening yen, and related derivative rollover risk that could amplify hedge cost in unfavorable market conditions and significantly increase liquidity requirements to support negative derivative settlements. Additionally, as discussed in detail in the Risk Factors section titled “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity,” there is a risk that losses realized on derivative settlements during periods of weakening yen may not be recouped through realization of the corresponding holding currency gains on the hedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments if these investments are not ultimately converted to yen. The following table details Aflac Japan's investments consistedportfolio allocation by currency as of yen-denominated fixed income securitiesDecember 31.

Japan Segment Portfolio Allocation by Currency
(In millions) 2018 2017 
  
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
USD program $24,435
$24,258
 $22,432
$23,716
 
Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen 1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
 
   Total dollar-denominated investments 26,114
26,527
 24,082
26,265
 
   Total yen-denominated investments 74,974
86,251
 72,369
84,379
 
      Total $101,088
$112,778
 $96,451
$110,644
 

As of $60.8

55



billion, at amortized cost, and yen-denominated equity securities of $472 million, at cost, at December 31, 2015. However,2018, Aflac Japan also ownshad $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and $9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the U.S. dollar-denominated fixed income securities of $14.9 billion, at amortized cost, whoseinvestments (USD Program). The fair value is hedged againstof Aflac Japan's unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

As noted above, in late 2017, the Company took steps to refine the strategy to mitigate currency exposure of Aflac Japan from U.S. dollar-denominated investments while balancing the consideration of the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan. This refinement in strategy resulted in an increased amount of the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan while at the same time mitigating hedge cost increases. Generally, Aflac Japan’s exposure to the currency risk increases when its portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments increases. This increases the volatility of the SMR and FSA earnings and may result in an adverse impact on these regulatory measures when yen appreciates relatively to U.S. dollar. This in turn may reduce Aflac Japan’s dividend capacity, as well as $7.8 billionincrease the level of fixed income securities, at cost, thatcapital needed to support increased SMR volatility. The adverse impact on the regulatory measures could be amplified by regulatory accounting rules requiring impairment loss recognition on prolonged significant declines in U.S. dollar relative to yen. Furthermore, under the scenario where unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments are not hedged.needed to pay Aflac Japan’s yen-denominated obligations, they would have to be converted to yen, which could force realization of the then potential currency losses. As the value of the U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio in Aflac Japan owns U.S. dollar-denominated equity securitiesfluctuates and the Company’s business model evolves, the Company periodically reevaluates this size of $4 million, at cost, as of December 31, 2015. Yen-denominated investment income accounted for 50% of the unhedged portfolio and may accordingly adjust up or down its currency hedging targets.

Aflac Japan's investment income in 2015, with the remainder denominated in U.S. dollars. In addition, Aflac Incorporated has yen-denominated debt obligations.Inc.
We are
The Company is exposed to currency risk as an economic event only when yen funds are actually converted into U.S. dollars. This occurs when we repatriate yen-denominated funds are paid as dividends and management fees from Aflac Japan to Aflac U.S.the Parent Company and with quarterly settlements of its reinsurance retrocession transactions. The exchange rates prevailing at the time of repatriationyen payments will differ from the exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. A portion of the yen repatriationdividend and management fee payments may be used to service Aflac Incorporated's yen-denominated notes payable with the remainder converted into U.S. dollars. In order to economically hedge foreign exchange risk for a portion of the profit repatriation received in yen from Aflac Japan, we had foreign exchange forwards and options as part of a hedging strategy on 30.0 billion yen, 102.5 billion yen, 25.0 billion yen, and 85.0 billion yen received in February 2015, July 2015, September 2015, and December 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, we had foreign exchange forwards and options to economically hedge foreign exchange risk on 124.1 billion yen of future profit repatriation from Aflac Japan.

In addition to profit repatriation,yen payments and the reinsurance retrocessions, certain investment activities for Aflac Japan expose usthe Company to economic currency risk when yen are converted into U.S. dollars. As noted above, we investthe Company invests a portion of ourits yen cash flows in U.S. dollar-denominated assets. This requires that wethe Company convert the yen cash flows to U.S. dollars before investing. As previously discussed, for certain of ourits U.S. dollar-denominated securities, we enterthe Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of hedged

78


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

investments. In 2018, the securities. The dollar couponParent Company entered into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency rate risk to dividend payments received on these investments are not hedged and are subject to foreign exchange fluctuations, which are realized in earnings. Also,by Aflac Japan, has invested in reverse-dual currency securities (RDCs, or yen-denominated debt securities with dollar coupon payments), which exposes Aflac to changes in foreign exchange rates. The foreign currency effectand reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. If the markets experience a significant strengthening of yen, this could cause cash strain at the Parent Company as a result of cash collateral and potentially cash settlement requirements. Based on the yen-denominated securities is accounted for as a componenttiming and severity of unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securitiesexchange rate fluctuations combined with the level of outstanding activity in accumulated other comprehensive income, whilethis program, the foreign currency effect on the dollar coupons is realized in earnings. The RDCs provided a higher yieldcash strain at the time of purchase than those available on Japanese government or other public corporate bonds, while still adhering to our investment standards at the time of the transaction. The yen/dollar exchange rate would have to strengthen to approximately 29 before the yield on these instruments would equal that of a comparable JGB instrument.Parent Company could be significant.
Aside from the activities discussed above, wethe Company generally dodoes not convert yen into U.S. dollars; however, we doit does translate financial statement amounts from yen into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, reported amounts are affected by foreign currency fluctuations. We reportThe Company reports unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income. In periods when the yen weakens against the dollar, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes more U.S. dollars to be reported. The weakening of the yen relative to the U.S. dollar will generally adversely affect the value of ourthe Company's yen-denominated investments in U.S. dollar terms. We attempt to minimizeThe Company also considers the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan and related exposure of shareholders' equity to foreign currency. We accomplishThe Company manages this currency risk by investing a portion of Aflac Japan's investment portfolio in U.S. dollar-denominated securities and by the Parent Company's issuance of yen-denominated debt (for additional information, see the discussion under the Hedging ActivitiesInvestments subsection of MD&A)within Item 1, Business). As a result, the effect of currency fluctuations on ourthe Company's net assets is reduced.
The following table demonstrates the effect of foreign currency fluctuations by presenting the dollar values of ourthe Company's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, and ourits consolidated yen-denominated net asset exposure at selected exchange rates as of December 31.


5679



Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Dollar Value of Yen-Denominated Assets and Liabilities
at Selected Exchange Rates
(In millions)2015 2014 2018 2017 
Yen/dollar exchange rates105.61
 
120.61(1)

 135.61
 105.55
 
120.55(1)

 135.55
 96.00
 
111.00 (1)

 126.00
 98.00
 
113.00(1)

 128.00
 
Yen-denominated financial instruments:                        
Assets:                        
Securities available for sale:                        
Fixed maturities(2)
$31,544
 $27,621
 $24,566
 $32,178
 $28,174
 $25,056
 
Fixed maturities - consolidated variable
interest entities
(3)
1,016
 890
 792
 1,273
 1,114
 992
 
Perpetual securities1,883
 1,649
 1,466
 2,458
 2,153
 1,914
 
Perpetual securities - consolidated
variable interest entities
(3)
214
 187
 167
 390
 341
 304
 
Fixed maturity securities (2)
$55,600
 $48,086
 $42,362
 $51,504
 $44,666
 $39,433
 
Fixed maturity securities - consolidated
variable interest entities
(3)
941
 814
 717
 1,089
 944
 834
 
Securities held to maturity:            
Fixed maturity securities35,055
 30,318
 26,709
 36,240
 31,430
 27,747
 
Equity securities408
 357
 318
 19
 17
 15
 742
 641
 565
 126
 109
 96
 
Equity securities - consolidated variable
interest entities
149
 130
 116
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 675
 586
 517
 
Securities held to maturity:            
Fixed maturities38,212
 33,459
 29,758
 39,013
 34,159
 30,379
 
Fixed maturities - consolidated variable
interest entities
(3)
0
 0
 0
 95
 83
 74
 
Cash and cash equivalents730
 640
 569
 370
 324
 288
 988
 855
 753
 222
 193
 170
 
Derivatives2,416
 676
 968
 596
 802
 1,266
 2,712
 417
 949
 1,961
 331
 528
 
Other financial instruments179
 156
 139
 159
 139
 124
 253
 219
 192
 228
 198
 175
 
Subtotal76,751
 65,765
 58,859
 76,551
 67,306
 60,412
 96,291
 81,350
 72,247
 92,045
 78,457
 69,500
 
Liabilities:                        
Notes payable234
 205
 183
 372
 325
 290
 2,120
 1,831
 1,615
 1,535
 1,331
 1,175
 
Derivatives545
 371
 1,901
 992
 2,423
 3,881
 1,318
 387
 2,138
 516
 474
 2,177
 
Subtotal779
 576
 2,084
 1,364
 2,748
 4,171
 3,438
 2,218
 3,753
 2,051
 1,805
 3,352
 
Net yen-denominated financial instruments75,972
 65,189
 56,775
 75,187
 64,558
 56,241
 92,853
 79,132
 68,494
 89,994
 76,652
 66,148
 
Other yen-denominated assets8,195
 7,176
 6,382
 8,212
 7,190
 6,394
 10,795
 9,336
 8,225
 9,406
 8,157
 7,201
 
Other yen-denominated liabilities94,775
 82,988
 73,808
 92,902
 81,342
 72,341
 113,994
 98,590
 86,853
 107,761
 93,456
 82,504
 
Consolidated yen-denominated net assets
(liabilities) subject to foreign currency
fluctuation
(2)
$(10,608) $(10,623) $(10,651) $(9,503) $(9,594) $(9,706) $(10,346) $(10,122) $(10,134) $(8,361) $(8,647) $(9,155) 
(1) Actual period-end exchange rate
(2) Does not include the U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds for which we havethe Company has entered into foreign currency derivatives as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A
(3) Does not include U.S. dollar-denominated bonds that have corresponding cross-currency swaps in consolidated VIEs


We areThe Company is required to consolidate certain VIEs. Some of the consolidated VIEs in Aflac Japan's portfolio use foreign currency swaps to convert foreign denominated cash flows to yen, the functional currency of Aflac Japan, in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations. Foreign currency swaps exchange an initial principal amount in two currencies, agreeing to re-exchange the currencies at a future date, at an agreed upon exchange rate. There may also be periodic exchanges of payments at specified intervals based on the agreed upon rates and notional amounts. Prior to consolidation, ourthe Company's beneficial interest in these VIEs was a yen-denominated available-for-sale fixed maturity security. Upon consolidation, the original yen-denominated investment was derecognized and the underlying fixed-maturity or perpetualfixed maturity securities and cross-currency swaps were recognized. The combination of a U.S. dollar-denominated investment and cross-currency swap economically creates a yen-denominated investment and has no impact on ourthe Company's net investment hedge position.


Similarly, the combination of the U.S. corporate bonds and the foreign currency forwards and options that we havethe Company has entered into, as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A, economically creates a yen-denominated investment that qualifies for inclusion as a component of ourthe Company's investment in Aflac Japan for net investment hedge purposes.



57



For additional information regarding ourthe Company's Aflac Japan net investment hedge, see the Hedging Activities subsection of MD&A.



80


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk


OurThe Company's primary interest rate exposure is to the impact of changes in interest rates on the fair value of ourits investments in debt and perpetual securities. We monitor ourThe Company monitors its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis utilizing a full valuation methodology, measuring price volatility, and sensitivity of the fair values of ourits investments to interest rate changes on the debt and perpetual securities we own.the Company owns. For example, if the current duration of a debt security or perpetual security is 10 years, then the fair value of that security will increase by approximately 10% if market interest rates decrease by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant. Likewise, the fair value of the debt security or perpetual security will decrease by approximately 10% if market interest rates increase by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant.


The estimated effect of potential increases in interest rates on the fair values of debt and perpetual securities we own;the Company owns; derivatives, excluding credit default swaps, and notes payable as of December 31 follows:

Sensitivity of Fair Values of Financial Instruments
to Interest Rate Changes
2015 20142018 2017
(In millions)Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
 Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
 Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
Assets:                  
Debt and perpetual securities:         
Fixed-maturity securities:         
Debt securities:         
Fixed maturity securities:         
Yen-denominated $66,031
 $57,470
 $67,785
 $58,596
  $85,622
 $73,673
 $83,682
 $72,146
 
Dollar-denominated 36,838
 32,364
 36,285
 32,865
  33,995
 31,327
 38,703
 35,518
 
Perpetual securities:         
Yen-denominated 1,836
 1,704
 2,494
 2,304
 
Dollar-denominated 111
 103
 175
 168
 
Total debt and perpetual securities $104,816
 $91,641
 $106,739
 $93,933
 
Total debt securities $119,617
 $105,000
 $122,385
 $107,664
 
Loans and loan receivables(1)
 $6,893
 $6,834
 $2,987
 $2,932
 
Derivatives $675
 $675
 $802
 $692
  $417
 $614
 $330
 $533
 
Liabilities:                  
Notes payable(1)
 $5,285
 $4,934
 $5,835
 $5,450
 
Notes payable(2)
 $5,876
 $5,415
 $5,553
 $4,900
 
Derivatives 371
 200
 2,423
 2,101
  387
 422
 474
 293
 
(1)Includes TREs, CMLs and MMLs, excludes policy loans
(2)Excludes capitalized lease obligations


There are various factors that affect the fair value of ourthe Company's investment in debt and perpetual securities. Included in those factors are changes in the prevailing interest rate environment, which directly affect the balance of unrealized gains or losses for a given period in relation to a prior period. Decreases in market yields generally improve the fair value of debt and perpetual securities, while increases in market yields generally have a negative impact on the fair value of ourthe Company's debt and perpetual securities. However, we dothe Company does not expect to realize a majority of any unrealized gains or losses because we generally have the intent and ability to hold such securities until a recovery of value, which may be maturity.losses. For additional information on unrealized losses on debt and perpetual securities, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


We attemptThe Company attempts to match the duration of ourits assets with the duration of ourits liabilities. The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac Japan's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)2015 2014 2018 2017 
Yen-denominated debt and perpetual securities14
 13
 
Yen-denominated debt securities16
 15
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years14
 14
 15
 14
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force10
 10
 10
 10
 




5881



Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)2015 2014 2018 2017 
Dollar-denominated debt and perpetual securities10
 11
 
Dollar-denominated debt securities9
 10
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years8
 8
 8
 8
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force6
 6
 6
 6
 


The following table shows a comparison of average required interest rates for future policy benefits and investment yields, based on amortized cost, for the years ended December 31.
Comparison of Interest Rates for Future Policy Benefits
and Investment Yields
(Net of Investment Expenses)
201520142013201820172016
U.S.        JapanU.S.        JapanU.S.        JapanU.S.        JapanU.S.        JapanU.S.        Japan
Policies issued during year:                          
Required interest on policy reserves 3.68% 1.81%
(1) 
 3.65% 1.87%
(1) 
 3.65% 2.00%
(1) 
 3.69% 1.00%
(1) 
 3.69% 1.10%
(1) 
 3.67% 1.38%
(1) 
New money yield on investments 4.37
 2.82
 4.16
 2.09
 3.93
 2.40
  4.44
 2.94
 4.41
 1.88
 3.81
 1.30
 
Policies in force at year-end:                          
Required interest on policy reserves 5.60
 3.61
(1) 
 5.69
 3.76
(1) 
 5.84
 3.91
(1) 
 5.34
 3.29
(1) 
 5.43
 3.38
(1) 
 5.51
 3.49
(1) 
Portfolio book yield, end of period 5.69
 2.70
 5.73
 2.76
 5.88
 2.72
  5.44
 2.49
 5.44
 2.46
 5.52
 2.52
 
(1)Represents investments for Aflac Japan that support policy obligations and therefore excludes Aflac Japan’s annuity products


We continueThe Company continues to monitor the spread between ourits new money yield and the required interest assumption for newly issued products in both the United States and Japan and will re-evaluate those assumptions as necessary. Over the next two years, we have yen-denominated securities that will mature with yields in excess of Aflac Japan's current net investment yield of 2.82%. These securities total $723 million at amortized cost and have a weighted average yield of 4.23%. Currently, when debt and perpetual securities we owninvestments the Company owns mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that of the interest required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. However, adding riders to our older policies has helped offset negative investment spreads on these policies. Overall, adequate profit margins exist in Aflac Japan's aggregate block of business because of changes in the mix of business and favorable experience from mortality, morbidity and expenses.


Periodically, depending on general economic conditions, wethe Company may enter into derivative transactions to hedge interest rate risk.risk, depending on general economic conditions.


For further information on interest rate derivatives, see Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Credit Risk


A significant portion of ourthe Company's investment portfolio consists of debt securities or perpetual securitiesand loans that expose usit to the credit risk of the underlying issuer. Weissuer or borrower. The Company carefully evaluateevaluates this risk on every new investment and closely monitormonitors the credit risk of ourits existing investment portfolio. We incorporateThe Company incorporates the needs of ourits products and liabilities, the overall requirements of the business, and other factors in addition to ourits underwriting of the credit risk for each investment in the portfolio.


Evaluating the underlying risks in ourthe Company's credit portfolio involves a multitude of factors including but not limited to ourits assessment of the issuersissuer's or borrower's business activities, assets, products, market position, financial condition, and future prospects. We also must incorporateThe Company incorporates the assessment of the NRSROs in assigning credit ratings and incorporates the rating methodologies of its specialist external managers in assigning loan ratings to our specific portfolio holdings. We performThe Company performs extensive internal assessments of the credit risks for all ourits portfolio holdings and potential new investments.

The ratings of our securities referenced in the two tables below are based on the ratings designationsinvestments, which includes using analyses provided by major NRSROs (Moody's, S&P and Fitch) or, if not rated, are determined based on our internal analysis of such securities.the Company's specialist external managers. For investment-grade securities whereassets managed by external asset managers, the ratings assigned by the major credit agencies are not equivalent, we use the second lowest rating that is assigned. For a description of the ratings methodology that we use when a security is below

59



investment grade or split-rated, see "Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Below-Investment-Grade and Split-Rated Securities" in the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A.

The distributions by credit rating of our purchases of debt securities for the years ended December31, based on acquisition cost, were as follows:
Composition of Purchases by Credit Rating
 2015 2014 2013 
AAA1.4% 7.6% .6% 
AA1.6
 74.5
 74.2
 
A39.3
 8.0
 12.6
 
BBB25.7
 8.3
 11.0
 
BB or lower32.0
 1.6
 1.6
 
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 
Purchases of securities from period to period are determined based on multiple objectives including appropriate portfolio diversification, the relative value of a potentialCompany provides investment and availability of investment opportunities, liquidity, credit and other risk factors while adhering to our investment policy guidelines. We did not purchase any perpetual securities during the periods presented in the table above. Total purchases comprise new money investments as well as the reinvestment of proceeds from investment disposals. The relatively higher purchases of AA rated securities in 2014 and 2013 were primarily due to the purchase of JGBs. The increase in purchases of A rated and BBB rated securities in 2015 was due primarily to the purchase of U.S. dollar-denominated corporate fixed-income publicly traded securities for the Aflac Japan portfolio. The significant increase in purchases of BB or lower rated securities in 2015 was due to increased investment in senior secured bank loans, most of which have below-investment-grade ratings, and investment in high yield corporate bonds. The bank loan investment program is managed externally by third party firms specializing in this asset class. This mandate requires a minimum average credit quality of BB-/Ba3, prohibits loan purchases rated below B/B2, and restricts exposure to any individual credit to less than 2% of the program’s assets. The objectives of this program include enhancing the yield on invested assets, achieving further diversification of credit risk parameters that must be used when making investment decisions and mitigatingrequire ongoing monitoring and reporting from the risk of rising interest rates throughasset managers on significant changes in credit risks within the acquisition of floating rate assets. The objective of the high yield corporate bond investments is to enhance yield on invested assets and further diversify our credit risk. All investments must have a minimum rating of low BB using our above described rating methodology and are managed by our internal credit portfolio management team.portfolio.


The distributions of debt and perpetual securities we own, by credit rating, as of December 31 were as follows:
Composition of Portfolio by Credit Rating
82


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
   2015   2014 
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
AAA 1.3%   1.3%   1.3%   1.3% 
AA 5.7
   5.7
   5.7
   5.8
 
A 61.0
   63.0
   64.1
   65.1
 
BBB 26.9
   25.1
   25.0
   23.9
 
BB or lower 5.1
   4.9
   3.9
   3.9
 
Total 100.0%   100.0%   100.0%   100.0% 


As of December 31, 2015, our direct and indirect exposure to securities in our investment portfolio that were guaranteed by third parties was immaterial both individually and in the aggregate.

Subordination Distribution

The majority of our total investments in debt and perpetual securities was senior debt at December 31, 2015 and 2014. We also maintained investments in subordinated financial instruments that primarily consisted of Lower Tier II, Upper Tier II, and Tier I securities, listed in order of seniority. The Lower Tier II securities are debt instruments with fixed maturities. Our Upper Tier II and Tier I investments consisted of debt instruments with fixed maturities and perpetual securities, which have an economic maturity as opposed to a stated maturity.

60




The following table shows the subordination distribution of our debt and perpetual securities as of December 31.
Subordination Distribution of Debt and Perpetual Securities
   2015   2014 
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Percentage
of Total
 Amortized
Cost
 Percentage
of Total
Senior notes $91,090
   94.9%   $89,308
   93.9% 
Subordinated securities:               
Fixed maturities (stated maturity date):               
Lower Tier II 2,470
   2.6
   2,751
   2.9
 
Tier I(1)
 105
   .1
   131
   .1
 
Surplus notes 301
   .3
   301
   .3
 
Trust preferred - non-banks 84
   .1
   85
   .1
 
Other subordinated - non-banks 51
   .1
   51
   .1
 
Total fixed maturities 3,011
   3.2
   3,319
   3.5
 
Perpetual securities (economic maturity date):               
Upper Tier II 1,217
   1.3
   1,554
   1.6
 
Tier I 441
   .4
   703
   .8
 
Other subordinated - non-banks 183
   .2
   183
   .2
 
Total perpetual securities 1,841
   1.9
   2,440
   2.6
 
Total debt and perpetual securities $95,942
   100.0%   $95,067
   100.0% 
(1)Includes trust preferred securities

Portfolio Composition

For information regarding the amortized cost for our investments in debt and perpetual securities, the cost for equity securities and the fair values of these investments, refer to Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Investment Concentrations


One of our largest sector concentrations as of December 31, 2015, was banks and financial institutions. Approximately 11% and 14% of our total portfolio of debt and perpetual securities, on an amortized cost basis, was in the bank and financial institution sector at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Within the countries we approve for investment opportunities, we primarily invest in financial institutions that are strategically crucial to each approved country's economy. The bank and financial institution sector is a highly regulated industry and plays a strategic role in the global economy. Within this sector, our credit risk by geographic region or country of issuer at December 31, 2015, based on amortized cost, was: Europe, excluding the United Kingdom (28%); United States (26%); Australia (8%); Japan (8%); United Kingdom (9%); and other (21%).


61



OurCompany's 15 largest global investment exposures as of December 31, 2015, were as follows:


Largest Global Investment Positions
(In millions)
December 31, 2018
 Amortized % of   Ratings
(In millions)Cost Total Seniority Moody’s S&P Fitch
Japan National Government(1)
$36,859
 38.42% Senior A1 A+ A
Republic of South Africa497
 .52
 Senior Baa2 BBB- BBB-
Bank of America NA375
 .39
        
    Bank of America Corp.207
 .22
 Senior Baa1 BBB+ A
    Bank of America Corp.166
 .17
 Lower Tier II Baa3 BBB  A-
    Bank of America NA2
 .00
 Senior A1 A   A+
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.373
 .39
        
 BTMU Curacao Holdings NV373
 .39
 Lower Tier II A2  A-
Investcorp SA357
 .37
        
    Investcorp Capital Limited357
 .37
 Senior Ba2  BB
JP Morgan Chase & Co.333
 .35
        
    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (including Bear Stearns Companies Inc.)295
 .31
 Senior A3 A-   A+
    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (Bank One Corp.)17
 .02
 Lower Tier II Baa1 BBB+ A
    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NBD Bank)11
 .01
 Lower Tier II A1 A- A
    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (FNBC)10
 .01
 Senior Aa1   A+ 
Banobras307
 .32
 Senior A3 BBB+ BBB+
Sultanate of Oman290
 .30
 Senior A1 BBB+ 
Koninklijke Ahold NV288
 .30
        
    Koninklijke Ahold NV273
 .28
 Senior Baa2 BBB BBB
    Ahold USA Lease15
 .02
 Senior Baa2 BBB 
Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex)287
 .30
        
    Pemex Proj FDG Master TR249
 .26
 Senior Baa1 BBB+ BBB+
    Pemex Finance Ltd.38
 .04
 Senior Baa1 A A+
Nordea Bank AB280
 .29
        
    Nordea Bank AB213
 .22
 Tier I Baa3 BBB 
    Nordea Bank Finland66
 .07
 Upper Tier II Baa2  
    Nordea Bank AB1
 .00
 Senior Aa3 AA- AA-
AXA275
 .29
        
    AXA-UAP224
 .24
 Upper Tier II A3 BBB BBB
    AXA51
 .05
 CC FNB A3 BBB BBB+
Deutsche Telekom AG270
 .28
        
    Deutsche Telekom AG249
 .26
 Senior Baa1 BBB+ BBB+
    Deutsche Telekom International Finance21
 .02
 Senior Baa1 BBB+ BBB+
CFE265
 .28
 Senior Baa1 BBB+ BBB+
Barclays Bank PLC263
 .27
        
    Barclays Bank PLC115
 .12
 Lower Tier II Baa3 BBB- A-
    Barclays Bank PLC102
 .11
 Upper Tier II Ba1 BB BBB
    Barclays Bank PLC46
 .04
 Tier 1 Ba2 BB BB+
                 Subtotal$41,319
 43.07%        
Total debt and perpetual securities$95,942
 100.00%        
    Total % of Total  
No. Consolidated Corporate/Sovereign Exposure Consolidated Fixed Maturity Credit
    Book Value Securities Rating
1 
Japan National Government (1)
 $51,207
 47.78% A+
2 Bank of America NA 411
 .38
  
      Bank of America Corp. 231
 .21
 A-
      Bank of America Corp. 180
 .17
 BBB+
3 Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. 405
 .38
 A-
4 Investcorp SA 383
 .36
 BB
5 Republic of South Africa 360
 .34
 BB+
6 Banobras 333
 .31
 BBB+
7 Nordea Bank AB 302
 .28
  
      Nordea Bank AB 231
 .21
 A-
      Nordea Bank AB 71
 .07
 BBB+
8 AXA 293
 .27
 BBB+
9 Deutsche Telekom AG 291
 .27
 BBB+
10 Japan Expswy Hld and Debt 291
 .27
 A+
11 CFE 287
 .27
 BBB+
12 AT&T Inc. 281
 .27
 BBB
13 Czech Republic 270
 .25
 A+
14 Investor AB 270
 .25
 AA-
15 Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) 270
 .25
 BBB+
                   Subtotal $55,654
 51.93%  
  Total fixed maturity securities $107,174
 100.00%  
(1)JGBs or JGB-backed securities
As previously disclosed, we ownthe Company owns long-dated debt instruments in support of ourits long-dated policyholder obligations. Some of ourthe Company's largest global investment holdings are positions that were purchased many years ago and increased in size due to merger and consolidation activity among the issuing entities. In addition, many of ourthe Company's largest holdings are yen-denominated, therefore strengthening of the yen can increase ourits position in dollars, and weakening of the yen can decrease ourits position in dollars. OurThe Company's global investment guidelines establish concentration limits for ourits investment portfolios.


GeographicalOil and Gas Exposure


The following tables show the breakout of our exposure to the oil and gas industry as of December 31.

 2018 
 Cost or Gross Gross    
 Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
(In millions)Cost Gains Losses Value
Securities available for sale,
  carried at fair value:
               
   Fixed maturities:               
         Independent exploration and production $813
   $72
   $36
   $849
 
         Integrated energy 426
   19
   30
   415
 
         Midstream 1,059
   91
   38
   1,112
 
         Oil field services 725
   9
   154
   580
 
         Refiners 346
   4
   20
   330
 
         Government owned - energy related 855
   167
   6
   1,016
 
         Natural gas utilities 472
   49
   6
   515
 
            Total securities available for sale 4,696
   411
   290
   4,817
 
Securities held to maturity,
  carried at amortized cost:
               
   Fixed maturities:               
         Integrated energy 234
   5
   0
   239
 
         Government owned - energy related 270
   0
   8
   262
 
         Natural gas utilities 360
   34
   0
   394
 
            Total securities held to maturity 864
   39
   8
   895
 
Equity Securities:               
         Independent exploration and production 2
   0
   0
   2
 
         Integrated energy 8
   0
   0
   8
 
         Oil field services 1
   0
   0
   1
 
         Refiners 4
   0
   0
   4
 
            Total equity securities 15
   0
   0
   15
 
                Total securities $5,575
   $450
   $298
   $5,727
 

Securities by Type of Issuance
The Company has investments in both publicly and privately issued securities. The Company's ability to sell either type of security is a function of overall market liquidity which is impacted by, among other things, the amount of outstanding securities of a particular issuer or issuance, trading history of the issue or issuer, overall market conditions, and idiosyncratic events affecting the specific issue or issuer.

The following table indicates the geographic exposuredetails investment securities by type of our investment portfolioissuance as of December 31.


6265



Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Investment Securities by Type of Issuance
 2015 2014 
(In millions)Amortized Cost % of
Total
 Amortized Cost % of
Total
 
Japan$39,593
 41.3% $39,804
 41.9% 
United States and Canada (1)
31,622
 33.0
 28,884
 30.4
 
United Kingdom2,697
 2.8
 3,121
 3.3
 
Germany2,558
 2.7
 2,657
 2.8
 
France1,755
 1.8
 1,747
 1.8
 
Peripheral Eurozone2,762
 2.9
 2,925
 3.1
 
     Portugal200
 .2
 200
 .2
 
     Italy1,514
 1.6
 1,674
 1.8
 
     Ireland364
 .4
 332
 .3
 
     Spain684
 .7
 719
 .8
 
Nordic Region1,906
 1.9
 2,198
 2.2
 
     Sweden682
 .7
 973
 1.0
 
     Norway512
 .5
 513
 .5
 
     Denmark332
 .3
 332
 .3
 
     Finland380
 .4
 380
 .4
 
Other Europe2,502
 2.6
 2,711
 2.8
 
     Netherlands1,367
 1.4
 1,497
 1.6
 
     Switzerland246
 .3
 225
 .2
 
     Czech Republic415
 .4
 415
 .4
 
     Austria115
 .1
 184
 .2
 
     Belgium182
 .2
 224
 .2
 
     Poland166
 .2
 166
 .2
 
     Luxembourg11
 .0
 0
 .0
 
Asia excluding Japan3,325
 3.5
 3,575
 3.8
 
Africa and Middle East2,478
 2.6
 2,121
 2.2
 
Latin America2,172
 2.3
 2,622
 2.8
 
Australia2,135
 2.2
 2,262
 2.4
 
All Others437
 .4
 440
 .5
 
     Total debt and perpetual securities$95,942
 100.0% $95,067
 100.0% 
   2018   2017 
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair   
Value   
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair  
Value  
Publicly issued securities:               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 $83,482
   $93,255
   $81,454
   $93,025
 
Equity securities (1)
 936
   936
   831
   1,006
 
      Total publicly issued 84,418
   94,191
   82,285
   94,031
 
Privately issued securities: (2)
               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 23,692
   26,362
   25,108
   29,360
 
Equity securities (1)
 51
   51
   15
   17
 
      Total privately issued 23,743
   26,413
   25,123
   29,377
 
      Total investment securities $108,161
   $120,604
   $107,408
   $123,408
 
(1)Includes total exposure to Puerto Rico of $1perpetual securities
(2) Includes Rule 144A securities

The Company held $1,202 million and $1,789 million of required deposits,perpetual securities at fair value ($1,201 million and $1,462 million at amortized cost) as of which 72% has insuranceDecember 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The perpetual securities the Company holds were largely issued by banks that are systemically important to the financial markets of principalthe sovereign country of domicile of the issuer. Generally, the Company believes regulatory changes made in the banking industry following the Global Financial Crisis and interest.
European sovereign debt crisis

Since 2008, many countries in Europe, and specifically Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Spain (collectively the "peripheral Eurozone" countries), have experienced a debt crisis. Collective action by multiple parties including the European Central Bank (ECB), International Monetary Fund (IMF), European Council,Sovereign Crisis, including increased capital and individual member states' governments had largelyliquidity requirements and a reduction of business risk, have improved market perceptionoverall bank creditworthiness. However, bank capital securities may be subject to varying bail-in/resolution regimes in their home countries, which may include conversion or write-down provisions when bank regulators determine that the institution has reached the point of non-viability. Such actions could result in lower cash flows and ratings downgrades of the situation across Europe. In exchange for this support, affected countries generally agreed to implement a series of measures to improve their fiscal situation in exchange for loans and other aid. Most countries continue to implement the prescribed austerity measures and have seen improvement in their economies,securities, which in turn has seen their creditworthiness improve or stabilize.could result in a reduction of fair value of the securities and increase the Company’s regulatory capital requirements. These factors are an integral part of the Company's credit review process.


The resolvefollowing table details the Company's privately issued investment securities as of December 31.
Privately Issued Securities
(Amortized cost, in millions)2018 2017 
Privately issued securities as a percentage of total investment securities22.0% 23.4% 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan$20,966
 $22,354
 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan as a percentage of total
investment securities
19.4% 20.8% 
Reverse-Dual Currency Securities(1)
(Amortized cost, in millions)2018 2017 
Privately issued reverse-dual currency securities$5,120
 $5,669
 
Publicly issued collateral structured as reverse-dual currency securities1,657
 1,390
 
Total reverse-dual currency securities$6,777
 $7,059
 
Reverse-dual currency securities as a percentage of total investment
securities
6.3% 6.6% 
(1)Principal payments in yen and interest payments in dollars

Aflac Japan has a portfolio of privately issued securities to better match liability characteristics and secure higher yields than those available on Japanese government or other public corporate bonds.Aflac Japan’s investments in yen-denominated privately issued securities consist primarily of non-Japanese issuers, are rated investment grade at purchase and have longer maturities, thereby allowing the Company to improve asset/liability matching and overall investment returns. These securities are generally either privately negotiated arrangements or issued under medium-term note programs and have standard documentation commensurate with credit ratings of the issuer, except when internal credit analysis indicates that additional protective and/or event-risk covenants were required. Many of these investments

66


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

have protective covenants appropriate to the specific investment. These may include a prohibition of certain activities by the borrower, maintenance of certain financial measures, and specific conditions impacting the payment of the Company's notes.

Hedging Activities

The Company uses derivative contracts to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. Derivative hedges are designed to reduce risk on an economic basis while minimizing the impact on financial results. The Company’s derivative hedge programs vary depending on the type of risk being hedged.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Hedge Program
The Company has deployed the following hedging strategies to mitigate exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk:
1.
Aflac Japan hedges U.S. dollar-denominated investments back to yen (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
2.
Aflac Japan maintains certain unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, which serve as an economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
3.
The Parent Company designates yen-denominated liabilities (notes payable and loans) as non-derivative hedging instruments and designates certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedges of the Company’s net investment in Aflac Japan (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).
4.
The Parent Company enters into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency exchange rate risk related to dividend payments by its subsidiary, Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).

Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program
Aflac Japan buys U.S. dollar-denominated investments, typically corporate bonds, and hedges them back to yen with foreign currency forwards and options to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk. This economically creates yen assets that match yen liabilities during the life of the derivative and provides liquidity and capital relief. The currency risk being hedged is generally based on fair value of hedged investments. The following table summarizes the U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan as of December 31.
 2018 2017
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale securities:     
  Fixed maturity securities (excluding bank loans) (1)
$17,101
$17,003
 $17,972
$19,314
  Fixed maturity securities - bank loans (floating rate)1,296
1,238
 1,936
1,865
  Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
Equity securities (1), (2)
177
177
 147
173
Other investments:     
  Transitional real estate loans (floating rate)3,621
3,625
 986
984
  Commercial mortgage loans763
736
 767
753
  Middle market loans (floating rate)1,144
1,146
 527
530
  Alternative investments333
333
 97
97
      Total U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan$26,114
$26,527
 $24,082
$26,265
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. for the adoption of accounting guidance related to financial instruments effective January 1, 2018.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and $9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the U.S. dollar-denominated investments. The fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

67


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Foreign exchange derivatives used for hedging are periodically settled, which results in cash receipt or payment at maturity or early termination. The Company had net cash settlements of $272 million, $(747) million and $1.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, associated with the currency derivatives used for hedging Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments.

The following table presents metrics related to Aflac Japan hedge costs as of December 31.

Aflac Japan Hedge Cost Metrics(1)
 2018 2017 2016
FX forward notional at end of period (in billions of dollars)(2)
9.9 9.3 11.8
Weighted average original tenor (in months)(3)
30.4 33.1 20.6
Weighted average remaining tenor (in months)(4)
21.4 27.7 18.5
Annualized amortized hedge costs (in basis points)(5)
241 211 149
Amortized hedge costs for period (in millions of dollars)(236) (228) (186)
(1) See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of amortized hedge costs.
(2) Notional is reported net of any offsetting positions
(3) Tenor based on derivative's original execution date to settlement date
(4) Tenor based on period reporting date to settlement date
(5) Based on annualized amortized hedge costs divided by average FX forward notional for the period

Parent Company's Foreign Currency Hedge Program

The Company has designated certain yen-denominated liabilities and foreign currency forwards and options of the Parent Company as accounting hedges of its net investment in Aflac Japan. The Company's consolidated yen-denominated net asset position was partially hedged at $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2018, with hedging instruments comprised completely of yen-denominated debt, compared with a hedge of $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2017, with hedging instruments comprised of $1.4 billion of yen-denominated debt and $.4 billion of foreign currency forwards and options.

The Company makes its accounting designation of net investment hedge at the beginning of each quarter. If the total of the designated Parent Company non-derivative and derivative notional is equal to or less than the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective, and the currency exchange effect on the yen-denominated liabilities and the change in estimated fair value of the derivatives are reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. The Company's net investment hedge was effective during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In order to economically mitigate risks associated with the enterprise-wide exposure to the yen and the level and volatility of hedge costs, the Parent Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts. By buying U.S. dollars and selling yen, the Parent Company is effectively lowering its overall economic exposure to the yen, while Aflac Japan's U.S dollar exposure remains reduced as a result of Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated hedge program that synthetically creates yen assets. Among other objectives, this strategy is intended to reduce the enterprise-wide hedge costs. In 2018, the portion of the enterprise-wide hedge costs reduction contributed by this strategy was $36 million. This activity is reported in the Corporate and other segment. As this program evolves, the Company will continue to evaluate the program’s efficacy, including third-party review.

Interest Rate Risk Hedge Program

To mitigate the risk of investment income volatility, the Company economically hedges interest rate fluctuations for certain variable-rate investments. To manage interest rate risk associated with its U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan, the Company also utilizes interest rate swaptions.

For additional discussion of the risks associated with the foreign currency exposure refer to the Currency Risk section in Item 1A, specifically to the Risk Factors titled “The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate“ and “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity." For discussion of the Company’s view on the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan, refer to the Investments subsection within Item 1, Business.


68


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's hedging activities.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The following table presents deferred policy acquisition costs by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 % Change     
Aflac Japan$6,384
 $6,150
 3.8%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.3,491
 3,355
 4.1
 
Total$9,875
 $9,505
 3.9% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s deferred policy acquisition costs increased 2.0% in yen during the year ended December 31, 2018.

See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's deferred policy acquisition costs.

Policy Liabilities
The following table presents policy liabilities by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 % Change       
Aflac Japan$92,791
 $89,132
 4.1%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.10,981
 10,625
 3.4
 
Other183
 138
 32.6
 
Intercompany eliminations (2)
(767) (748) 2.5
 
Total$103,188
 $99,147
 4.1% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s policy liabilities increased 2.3% in yen during the year ended December 31, 2018.
(2) Elimination entry necessary due to recapture of a portion of policy liabilities ceded externally, as a result of the reinsurance retrocession transaction as described in Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's policy liabilities.

Notes Payable
Notes payable totaled $5.8 billion at December 31, 2018, compared with $5.3 billion at December 31, 2017.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semiannually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's notes payable.


69


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Benefit Plans
Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. have various benefit plans. For additional information on the Company's Japanese and U.S. plans, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Policyholder Protection
Policyholder Protection Corporation

The Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. Legislation enacted regarding the framework of the Life Insurance Policyholder Protection Corporation (LIPPC) included government fiscal measures supporting the LIPPC. On March 30, 2012, the Diet approved legislation to enhance the stability of the LIPPC by extending the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2017. On November 25, 2016, Japan's Diet passed legislation that again extends the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2022. Effective April 2014, the annual LIPPC contribution amount for the total life industry was lowered from 40 billion yen to 33 billion yen.

Guaranty Fund Assessments

Under U.S. state guaranty association laws, certain insurance companies can be assessed (up to prescribed limits) for certain obligations to the policyholders and claimants of impaired or insolvent insurance companies that write the same line or similar lines of business. The amount of the guaranty fund assessment that an insurer is assessed is based on its proportionate share of premiums in that state.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has estimated and recognized the impact of its share of guaranty fund assessments resulting from the liquidation of a long-term care insurer. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the assessment.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had no material letters of credit, standby letters of credit, guarantees or standby repurchase obligations. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on material unconditional purchase obligations that are not recorded on the Company's balance sheet.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. provide the primary sources of liquidity to the Parent Company through dividends and management fees. The following table presents the amounts provided for the years ended December 31.
Liquidity Provided by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. to Parent Company
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Dividends declared or paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.$1,817

$2,590
(1) 
$2,000
 
Management fees paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.204
 291
 260
 
(1) Includes securities of $622 at fair value which had a value of $656 at amortized cost

The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to prior years due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018.

The primary uses of cash by the Parent Company are shareholder dividends, the repurchase of its common stock and interest on its outstanding indebtedness and operating expenses.

At the end of September 2018, the Company announced a change in its internal dividend policy which allows the
Company to increase the proportion of regulatory earnings transferred from Aflac U.S. and Aflac Japan to the Parent
Company. The Company intends to maintain higher than historical levels of capital and liquidity at the Parent Company with the goals of addressing the Company’s hedge costs and related potential need for collateral and mitigating against long-term weakening of the Japanese yen. Further, the Company plans to continue to maintain a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar based investments at Aflac Japan and consider whether the amount of such investments should be increased

70


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

or decreased relative to the Company’s view of economic equity surplus in Aflac Japan in light of potentially rising hedge costs and other factors. See Item 2., Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under “Forward-Looking Information,” for a description of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the Company in regards to its capital management intentions.

The Parent Company accesses debt security markets to provide additional sources of capital. In September 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC that allows the Company to issue an indefinite amount of debt securities, in one or more series, from time to time until September 2021. In August 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration with Japanese regulatory authorities that allows the Parent Company to conduct public offerings of bonds in Japan, including yen-denominated Samurai notes, up to 200 billion yen or its equivalent through August 2020. The shelf registration statement is for possible public offerings in Japan, but the bonds issued under the shelf may be transferred by the bondholders to U.S. persons in compliance with U.S. law. The Company believes outside sources for additional debt and equity capital, if needed, will continue to be available. For additional information, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The principal sources of cash for the Company's insurance operations are premiums and investment income. The primary uses of cash by the Company's insurance operations are investments, policy claims, commissions, operating expenses, income taxes and payments to the Parent Company for management fees and dividends. Both the sources and uses of cash are reasonably predictable.

When making an investment decision, the Company's first consideration is based on product needs. The Company's investment objectives provide for liquidity through the purchase of investment-grade debt securities. These objectives also take into account duration matching, and because of the long-term nature of the Company's business, the Company has adequate time to react to changing cash flow needs.

As a result of policyholder aging, claims payments are expected to gradually increase over the life of a policy. Therefore, future policy benefit reserves are accumulated in the early years of a policy and are designed to help fund future claims payments. The Company expects its future cash flows from premiums and its investment portfolio to be sufficient to meet its cash needs for benefits and expenses.

As of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company and Aflac had four lines of credit with third parties as well as two intercompany lines of credit. For additional information on the Company's lines of credit, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As part of the FHLB financing arrangement as discussed previously in the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A, Aflac U.S. borrowed and repaid $86 million during 2018.

The Company's financial statements convey its financing arrangements during the periods presented. The Company has not engaged in material intra-period short-term financings during the periods presented that are not otherwise reported in its balance sheet or disclosed therein. The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2018. The Company has not entered into transactions involving the transfer of financial assets with an obligation to repurchase financial assets that have been accounted for as a sale under applicable accounting standards, including securities lending transactions. See Notes 1, 3, and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Company's securities lending and derivative activities. With the exception of disclosed activities in those referenced footnotes and the Risk Factors entitled, "The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate" and "Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity," the Company does not have a known trend, demand, commitment, event or uncertainty that would reasonably result in its liquidity increasing or decreasing by a material amount. As of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company had $1.0 billion as a capital reserve and an additional $1.0 billion of contingent liquidity in order to mitigate liquidity risk of derivative positions that are reducing enterprise-wide foreign currency exposure. The Company's cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted cash on hand, money market instruments, and other debt instruments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased, all of which has minimal market, settlement or other risk exposure.

The following table presents the estimated payments by period of the Company's major contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018. The Company translated its yen-denominated obligations using the December 31, 2018, exchange rate. Actual future payments as reported in dollars will fluctuate with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate.

71


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Distribution of Payments by Period
(In millions)
Total
Liability
(1)
 Total
Payments
 Less
Than
One Year
 
One to
Three Years
 Four to
Five Years
 After
Five Years
Future policy benefits liability (Note 7)(2)
$86,368
  $251,577
 $8,980
 $17,817
 $17,807
 $206,973
Unpaid policy claims liability (Note 7)(3)
4,584
  4,584
 2,950
 951
 387
 296
Other policyholders' funds (Note 7)(3)
7,146
 9,920
 321
 360
 581
 8,658
Long-term debt – principal (Note 9)
5,765
  5,813
 0
 45
 1,275
 4,493
Long-term debt – interest (Note 9)
37
  2,086
 175
 327
 284
 1,300
Cash collateral on loaned securities (Note 3)
1,052
 1,052
 1,052
 0
 0
 0
Operating service agreements (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
553
 165
 289
 99
 0
Operating lease obligations (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
202
 63
 82
 39
 18
Capitalized lease obligations (Note 9)
13
  13
 5
 5
 2
 1
Total contractual obligations$104,965
  $275,800
 $13,711
 $19,876
 $20,474
 $221,739
Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of $15 have been excluded from the tabular disclosure above because the timing of cash payment is not reasonably estimable.
(1)Liability amounts are those reported on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018.
(2)The estimated payments due by period reflect future estimated cash payments to be made to policyholders and others for future policy benefits. These projected cash outflows are based on assumptions for future policy persistency, mortality, morbidity, and other assumptions comparable with the Company's experience, consider future premium receipts on current policies in force, and assume market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs. These cash outflows are undiscounted with respect to interest and, as a result, the sum of the cash outflows shown for all years in the table of $251,577 exceeds the corresponding liability amount of $86,368. The Company has made significant assumptions to determine the future estimated cash outflows related to the underlying policies and contracts. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, actual cash outflow amounts and timing will differ, possibly materially, from these estimates.
(3)Includes assumptions as to the timing of policyholders reporting claims for prior periods and the amount of those claims. Actual amounts and timing of unpaid policy claims payments may differ significantly from the estimates above.
(4)Not applicable

For more information on the Company's major contractual obligations, see the applicable Note in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as indicated in the line items in the table above.

Consolidated Cash Flows

The Company translates cash flows for Aflac Japan's yen-denominated items into U.S. dollars using weighted-average exchange rates. In years when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars causes more dollars to be reported.

The following table summarizes consolidated cash flows by activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Operating activities$6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 
Investing activities(3,582) (5,431) (3,855) 
Financing activities(1,616) (2,065) (1,619) 
Exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents30
 0
 (4) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents$846
 $(1,368) $509
 

Operating Activities

Consolidated cash flow from operations decreased 1.9% in 2018, compared with 2017. The following table summarizes operating cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$4,916
 $4,959
 $4,605
 
Aflac U.S. and other operations1,098
 1,169
 1,382
 
Total$6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 


72


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Investing Activities

Operating cash flow is primarily used to purchase investments to meet future policy obligations. The following table summarizes investing cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$(2,938) $(4,504) $(3,075) 
Aflac U.S. and other operations(644) (927) (780) 
Total$(3,582) $(5,431) $(3,855) 

Prudent portfolio management dictates that the Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. Currently, when the Company's fixed maturity securities mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. However, the long-term nature of the Company's business and its strong cash flows provide the Company with the ability to minimize the effect of mismatched durations and/or yields identified by various asset adequacy analyses. From time to time or when market opportunities arise, the Company disposes of selected fixed maturity securities that are available for sale to improve the duration matching of assets and liabilities, improve future investment yields, and/or re-balance its portfolio. As a result, dispositions before maturity can vary significantly from year to year.

As part of its overall corporate strategy, the Company announced in September 2018 that it intends to increase its original investment in the Aflac Ventures Fund from $100 million over three years to $250 million over three to four years, as opportunities emerge. These investments are included in equity securities or the other investments line in the consolidated balance sheets. The Aflac Ventures Fund is a subsidiary of Aflac Corporate Ventures which is reported in the "Corporate and other" business segment. The central mission of Aflac Corporate Ventures is to support the organic growth and business development needs of Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. with emphasis on digital applications designed to improve the customer experience, gain efficiencies, and develop new markets in an effort to enhance and defend long-term shareholder value.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on certain investment commitments.

Financing Activities

Consolidated cash used by financing activities was $1.6 billion in 2018, $2.1 billion in 2017 and $1.6 billion in 2016.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of its senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In January 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of .932% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 10-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

73


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


In February 2017, the Parent Company extinguished $650 million of 2.65% senior notes upon their maturity.

In October 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of subordinated debentures through a U.S. public debt offering. The debentures bear interest at an initial rate of 2.108% per annum through October 22, 2027, or earlier redemption. Thereafter, the rate of the interest of the debentures will be reset every five years at a rate of interest equal to the then-current JPY 5-year Swap Offered Rate plus 205 basis points. The debentures are payable semi-annually in arrears and have a 30-year maturity. The debentures are redeemable (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax events or certain rating agency events, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the debentures or (ii) in 10 years, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption. In November 2017, the Parent Company used a portion of net proceeds from the debenture offering to redeem $500 million of the Parent Company's 5.50% subordinated debentures due 2052. The pretax non-operating expense due to the early redemption of these notes was $13 million.

In September 2016, the Parent Company issued two series of senior notes totaling $700 million through a U.S. public debt offering. The first series, which totaled $300 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.875% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 10-year maturity. The second series, which totaled $400 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 30-year maturity.

In September 2016, the Parent Company entered into two series of senior unsecured term loan facilities totaling 30.0 billion yen. The first series, which totaled 5.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to the TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .20% and .60%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second series, which totaled 25.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .35% and .75%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In December 2016, the Parent Company completed a tender offer in which it extinguished $176 million principal of its 6.90% senior notes due 2039 and $193 million principal of its 6.45% senior notes due 2040. The pretax non-operating loss due to the early redemption of these notes was $137 million ($89 million after-tax, or $.21 per diluted share).

In September 2016, the Parent Company extinguished 8.0 billion yen of 2.26% fixed rate Uridashi notes upon their maturity and in July 2016, the Parent Company extinguished 15.8 billion yen of 1.84% fixed rate Samurai notes upon their maturity.

See Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the debt issuances discussed above.

See the preceding discussion in this Capital Resources and Liquidity section of MD&A for details and any outstanding balances as of December 31, 2018 for the Company's lines of credit and FHLB financing arrangement.

The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2018.

Cash returned to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases was $2.1 billion in 2018, compared with $2.0 billion in 2017 and $2.1 billion in 2016.

The following tables present a summary of treasury stock activity during the years ended December 31.
Treasury Stock Purchased
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016 
Treasury stock purchases$1,301
 $1,351
 $1,422
 
Number of shares purchased:      
Open market28,949
 35,510
 43,236
 
Other392
 1,018
 660
 
   Total shares purchased29,341
 36,528
 43,896
 

74


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Treasury Stock Issued
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016 
Stock issued from treasury:      
   Cash financing$58
 $33
 $46
 
   Noncash financing17
 59
 61
 
   Total stock issued from treasury$75
 $92
 $107
 
Number of shares issued1,939
 2,554
 3,704
 

Under share repurchase authorizations from the Company's board of directors, the Company purchased 28.9 million shares of its common stock in the open market in 2018, compared with 35.5 million shares in 2017 and 43.2 million shares in 2016. As of December 31, 2018, a remaining balance of 69.0 million shares of the Company's common stock was available for purchase under share repurchase authorizations by its board of directors. The Company currently plans to repurchase $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion of its common stock in 2019, assuming stable capital conditions and absent compelling alternatives. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Cash dividends paid to shareholders in 2018 of $1.04 per share increased 19.5% over 2017. The 2017 dividend paid of $.87 per share increased 4.8% over 2016. The following table presents the dividend activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Dividends paid in cash$793
 $661
 $658
 
Dividends through issuance of treasury shares8
 29
 27
 
Total dividends to shareholders$801
 $690
 $685
 

In January 2019, the board of directors announced a 3.8% increase in the quarterly cash dividend, effective with the first quarter of 2019. The first quarter 2019 cash dividend of $.27 per share is payable on March 1, 2019, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 20, 2019.

Regulatory Restrictions

Aflac and CAIC are domiciled in Nebraska and are subject to its regulations. Subsequent to the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, Aflac Japan is domiciled in Japan and subject to local regulations. See further discussion
below. The Nebraska Department of Insurance imposes certain limitations and restrictions on payments of dividends, management fees, loans and advances to the Parent Company. Under Nebraska insurance law, prior approval of the Nebraska Department of Insurance is required for dividend distributions that exceed the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. In addition, the Nebraska insurance department must approve service arrangements and other transactions within the affiliated group of companies. These regulatory limitations are not expected to affect the level of management fees or dividends paid to the Parent Company. (See below for discussion of restrictions imposed by Japanese insurance regulators.) A life insurance company’s statutory capital and surplus is determined according to rules prescribed by the NAIC, as modified by the insurance department in the insurance company’s state of domicile. Statutory accounting rules are different from U.S. GAAP and are intended to emphasize policyholder protection and company solvency. Similar laws apply in New York, the domiciliary jurisdiction of Aflac's New York insurance subsidiary. As of December 2016, CAIC was redomiciled from South Carolina to Nebraska.

The continued long-term growth of the Company's business may require increases in the statutory capital and surplus of its insurance operations. Aflac’s insurance operations may secure additional statutory capital through various sources, such as internally generated statutory earnings, capital contributions by the Parent Company from funds generated through debt or equity offerings, or reinsurance transactions. The NAIC’s RBC formula is used by insurance regulators to help identify inadequately capitalized insurance companies. The RBC formula quantifies insurance risk, business risk, asset risk and interest rate risk by weighing the types and mixtures of risks inherent in the insurer’s operations.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 560%. The 2018 RBC as filed is lower than Aflac U.S. standalone RBC due to the inclusion of Aflac Japan for the first quarter of 2018. The RBC charge reflects the business risk without any total adjusted capital (TAC). At December 31, 2017, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 831%, which included Aflac Japan. Aflac's RBC ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position, even reflecting the full negative impact of the U.S. Tax Act, which was fully adopted in 2018. This reduction occurs as a result of

75


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

writing down deferred tax assets and the increase in required capital due to the reduction in tax rates. However, Aflac expects to recover from this negative impact over a period of three to five years through additional statutory income, assuming that the additional income is fully retained. As of December 31, 2018, Aflac's total adjusted capital of $2.7 billion exceeded the company action level required capital and surplus of $.5 billion by $2.2 billion.

The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid to the Parent Company by Aflac without prior approval of Nebraska's director of insurance is the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. Dividends declared by Aflac during 2019 in excess of $1.3 billion would be considered extraordinary and require such approval. Following the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, the Company used extraordinary dividends as needed to actively manage to appropriate RBC levels that are lower yet sufficient to maintain ratings and support prudent capital management. See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the impact of permitted practices by the Nebraska Department of Insurance on the Company's statutory capital and surplus.

The NAIC considers its Solvency Modernization Initiative (SMI) process relating to updating the U.S. insurance solvency regulation framework to be ongoing. The SMI has focused on key issues such as capital requirements, governance and risk management, group supervision, reinsurance, statutory accounting and financial reporting matters. Many of these key issues have been finalized and/or are near completion; however, the NAIC still has some ongoing initiatives related to SMI, such as monitoring the international efforts on group capital requirements as well as RBC.In addition, the NAIC is also considering changes to investment risk factors. Any negative developments by the NAIC in these areas could result in increased capital requirements for the Company.

Aflac is subject to the NAIC’s Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA), effective January 1, 2015. Through the ORSA requirements, Aflac is expected to regularly, no less than annually, conduct an ORSA to assess the adequacy of its risk management framework, and its current and estimated projected future solvency position; internally document the process and results of the assessment; and provide a confidential high-level ORSA Summary Report annually to the lead state commissioner if the insurer is a member of an insurance group. In November 2018, Aflac filed its ORSA report with the Nebraska Department of Insurance.

In addition to limitations and restrictions imposed by U.S. insurance regulators, after the Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, the new Japan subsidiary is required to meet certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law in order to provide dividends to the Parent Company. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at the Japan subsidiary is basically defined as retained earnings excluding capital reserves, which represent equity generated by capital profits that are statutorily required in Japan, less net after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities based on the previous fiscal year-end. These dividend capacity requirements are generally aligned with the solvency margin ratio (SMR). Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) maintains its own solvency standard which is quantified through the SMR. Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread, and foreign exchange rate changes, therefore the Company continues to evaluate alternatives for reducing this sensitivity. In the event of a rapid change in market risk conditions causing SMR to decline, the Company has two senior unsecured revolving credit facilities in the amounts of 100 billion yen and 55 billion yen, respectively, and a committed reinsurance facility in the amount of approximately 110 billion yen as a capital contingency plan. Additionally, the Company could take action to enter into derivatives on unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments with foreign currency options or forwards. (See Notes 8 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.)

The Company has already undertaken various measures to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR. For example, the Company employs policy reserve matching (PRM) investment strategies, which is a Japan-specific accounting treatment that reduces SMR interest rate sensitivity since PRM-designated investments are carried at amortized cost consistent with corresponding liabilities. In order for a PRM-designated asset to be held at amortized cost, there are certain criteria that must be maintained. The primary criteria relates to maintaining the duration of designated assets and liabilities within a specified tolerance range. If the duration difference is not maintained within the specified range without rebalancing, then a certain portion of the assets must be re-classified as available for sale and held at fair value with any associated unrealized gain or loss recorded in surplus. To rebalance, assets may need to be sold in order to maintain the European Monetary Union (EMU)duration with the specified range, resulting in realizing a gain or loss from the sale. For U.S. GAAP, PRM investments are categorized as available for sale. The Company also uses foreign currency derivatives to hedge a portion of its U.S. dollar-denominated investments.(See Notes 3, 4 and 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's investment strategies, hedging activities, and reinsurance, respectively.)

Aflac's SMR ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position. As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan's SMR was tested in 2015 following965%, compared with 1,064% at December 31, 2017. As part of the electionconversion of Aflac Japan from a

76


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

branch to a new government in Greece, who rejectedsubsidiary on April 1, 2018, the requirements imposed in exchange for their previous support packages. After a period of tense negotiations which threatened Greece’s ability to remainCompany experienced an accounting-driven decline in the EMU, agreements wereSMR of approximately 130 points, compared with the SMR as of December 31, 2017. The Company expects to be able to pay dividends out of certain accounts, thus restoring this accounting impact over an estimated three-year period.

The FSA has been conducting field testing with the insurance industry concerning the introduction of an economic value-based solvency regime. The field testing will assist the FSA in determining if an economic value-based solvency regime in Japan will be appropriate for the insurance industry.

Payments are made which provided Greecefrom Aflac Japan to the Parent Company for management fees, allocated expenses and remittances of earnings. Prior to the Aflac Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan paid allocated expenses and profit remittances to Aflac U.S. The following table details Aflac Japan remittances for the years ended December 31.

Aflac Japan Remittances
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan management fees paid to Parent Company$136
 $93
 $79
 
Expenses allocated to Aflac Japan (in dollars)24
 109
 106
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in dollars)808
 1,150
 1,286
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in yen)89.7
 129.3
 138.5
 

The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to prior years due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. See the preceding Hedging Activities subsection of this MD&A for discussion of Parent Company hedging of yen profit remittances. For additional aid in exchange for an updated set of requirements. These actions have stabilized the situation currently.


63



Although recent economic indicators show improvement from the depthsinformation on regulatory restrictions on dividends, profit remittances and other transfers, see Note 13 of the crisis across mostNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other

For information regarding commitments and contingent liabilities, see Note 15 of the Eurozone, overall economic activity remains subdued throughoutNotes to the region. ToConsolidated Financial Statements.

Additional Information

Investors should note that the Company announces material financial information in its SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls. In accordance with SEC guidance, the Company may also use the Investor Relations section of the Company's website (http://investors.aflac.com) to communicate with investors about the Company. It is possible that the financial and other information the Company posts there could be deemed to be material information. The information on the Company's website is not part of this document.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed primarily to the following types of market risks: currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and equity risk. Fluctuations in these factors could impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The Company regularly monitors its market risks and uses a variety of strategies to manage its exposure
to these market risks.

Currency Risk

Aflac Japan

The functional currency of Aflac Japan's insurance operations is the Japanese yen. Aflac Japan’s premiums and a significant portion of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Most of Aflac Japan's cash and liabilities are yen-denominated.

77


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


As discussed above in the returnInvestment subsection of Item 1, Business, the Company engages in hedging activities to sustainable economic growth,mitigate certain currency risks from holding U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan. However, this hedging program in turn poses a countervailing long-term risk of loss on hedging currency derivatives under the ECB has launchedlong-term scenario of weakening yen, and related derivative rollover risk that could amplify hedge cost in unfavorable market conditions and significantly increase liquidity requirements to support negative derivative settlements. Additionally, as discussed in detail in the Risk Factors section titled “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity,” there is a quantitative easing (QE) stimulus program.risk that losses realized on derivative settlements during periods of weakening yen may not be recouped through realization of the corresponding holding currency gains on the hedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments if these investments are not ultimately converted to yen. The following table details Aflac Japan's portfolio allocation by currency as of December 31.


SinceJapan Segment Portfolio Allocation by Currency
(In millions) 2018 2017 
  
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
USD program $24,435
$24,258
 $22,432
$23,716
 
Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen 1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
 
   Total dollar-denominated investments 26,114
26,527
 24,082
26,265
 
   Total yen-denominated investments 74,974
86,251
 72,369
84,379
 
      Total $101,088
$112,778
 $96,451
$110,644
 

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and $9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the crisis first began, weU.S. dollar-denominated investments (USD Program). The fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have takenbeen economically converted to yen using derivatives).

As noted above, in late 2017, the Company took steps to improverefine the risk profilestrategy to mitigate currency exposure of our portfolio by selling certain holdings throughout Europe, includingAflac Japan from U.S. dollar-denominated investments while balancing the peripheral Eurozone countries.
The primary factor considered when determining the domicile of investment exposure is the legal country risk locationconsideration of the issuer. However, other factors such as the locationstressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan. This refinement in strategy resulted in an increased amount of the parent guarantor,unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan while at the locationsame time mitigating hedge cost increases. Generally, Aflac Japan’s exposure to the currency risk increases when its portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments increases. This increases the volatility of the company's headquarters or major business operations (including locationSMR and FSA earnings and may result in an adverse impact on these regulatory measures when yen appreciates relatively to U.S. dollar. This in turn may reduce Aflac Japan’s dividend capacity, as well as increase the level of major assets), location of primary market (including location of revenue generation) and specific country risk publicly recognizedcapital needed to support increased SMR volatility. The adverse impact on the regulatory measures could be amplified by rating agencies can influenceregulatory accounting rules requiring impairment loss recognition on prolonged significant declines in U.S. dollar relative to yen. Furthermore, under the assignmentscenario where unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments are needed to pay Aflac Japan’s yen-denominated obligations, they would have to be converted to yen, which could force realization of the country (or geographic) risk location. When the issuer is a special financing vehicle or a branch or subsidiary of a global company, then we consider any guarantees and/or legal, regulatory and corporate relationships of the issuer relative to its ultimate parent in determining the proper assignment of country risk.
Investments in Certain European Countries - monitoring and mitigating exposure

Our internal team of experienced credit professionals has continued to monitor the impact of the European sovereign crisis on our individual investment holdings' overall credit quality. Our analysis includes factors beyond a baseline assessment of a company's assets, operations, financial statements, and credit metrics that may provide support for the instruments we own. Specifically, for our investments in European banks and financial institutions, we monitor the importance of the issuer to its local financial system, the likelihood of government support, and our investment's position in the capital structure of the issuer. For our investments in European utilities, we monitor the role of the issuer in its local economy as a provider of necessary infrastructure, and we monitorpotential currency losses. As the value of the underlying assets owned byU.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio in Aflac Japan fluctuates and the issuer. For our investment in European corporates, industrials, and other commercial entities, we monitorCompany’s business model evolves, the general credit qualityCompany periodically reevaluates this size of the issuer,unhedged portfolio and may accordingly adjust up or down its currency hedging targets.

Aflac Inc.

The Company is exposed to currency risk as an economic event when yen funds are actually converted into U.S. dollars. This occurs when yen-denominated funds are paid as dividends and management fees from Aflac Japan to the geographical mixParent Company and with quarterly settlements of its reinsurance retrocession transactions. The exchange rates prevailing at the time of yen payments will differ from the exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. A portion of the issuer's customers (i.e. domestic vs. foreign),yen dividend and management fee payments may be used to service Aflac Incorporated's yen-denominated notes payable with the geographical breakdownremainder converted into U.S. dollars.

In addition to yen payments and the reinsurance retrocessions, certain investment activities for Aflac Japan expose the Company to economic currency risk when yen are converted into U.S. dollars. As noted above, the Company invests a portion of its yen cash flows in U.S. dollar-denominated assets. This requires that the Company convert the yen cash flows to U.S. dollars before investing. As previously discussed, for certain of its U.S. dollar-denominated securities, the Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of hedged

78


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

investments. In 2018, the Parent Company entered into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency rate risk to dividend payments by Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. If the markets experience a significant strengthening of yen, this could cause cash strain at the Parent Company as a result of cash collateral and potentially cash settlement requirements. Based on the timing and severity of exchange rate fluctuations combined with the level of outstanding activity in this program, the cash strain at the Parent Company could be significant.
Aside from the activities discussed above, the Company generally does not convert yen into U.S. dollars; however, it does translate financial statement amounts from yen into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, reported amounts are affected by foreign currency fluctuations. The Company reports unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income. In periods when the yen weakens against the dollar, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes more U.S. dollars to be reported. The weakening of the issuer's assets (i.e. domestic versus foreign),yen relative to the U.S. dollar will generally adversely affect the value of the underlying assets ownedCompany's yen-denominated investments in U.S. dollar terms. The Company also considers the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan and related exposure to foreign currency. The Company manages this currency risk by investing a portion of Aflac Japan's investment portfolio in U.S. dollar-denominated securities and by the issuer, capitalizationParent Company's issuance of yen-denominated debt (for additional information, see the discussion under the Investments subsection within Item 1, Business). As a result, the effect of currency fluctuations on the Company's net assets is reduced.
The following table demonstrates the effect of foreign currency fluctuations by presenting the dollar values of the issuer,Company's yen-denominated assets and overall profitabilityliabilities, and cash generation abilityits consolidated yen-denominated net asset exposure at selected exchange rates as of December 31.

79


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Dollar Value of Yen-Denominated Assets and Liabilities
at Selected Exchange Rates
(In millions)2018 2017 
Yen/dollar exchange rates96.00
 
111.00 (1)

 126.00
 98.00
 
113.00(1)

 128.00
 
Yen-denominated financial instruments:            
Assets:            
Securities available for sale:            
Fixed maturity securities (2)
$55,600
 $48,086
 $42,362
 $51,504
 $44,666
 $39,433
 
Fixed maturity securities - consolidated
variable interest entities
 (3)
941
 814
 717
 1,089
 944
 834
 
Securities held to maturity:            
Fixed maturity securities35,055
 30,318
 26,709
 36,240
 31,430
 27,747
 
Equity securities742
 641
 565
 126
 109
 96
 
Equity securities - consolidated variable
interest entities
0
 0
 0
 675
 586
 517
 
Cash and cash equivalents988
 855
 753
 222
 193
 170
 
Derivatives2,712
 417
 949
 1,961
 331
 528
 
Other financial instruments253
 219
 192
 228
 198
 175
 
Subtotal96,291
 81,350
 72,247
 92,045
 78,457
 69,500
 
Liabilities:            
Notes payable2,120
 1,831
 1,615
 1,535
 1,331
 1,175
 
Derivatives1,318
 387
 2,138
 516
 474
 2,177
 
Subtotal3,438
 2,218
 3,753
 2,051
 1,805
 3,352
 
Net yen-denominated financial instruments92,853
 79,132
 68,494
 89,994
 76,652
 66,148
 
Other yen-denominated assets10,795
 9,336
 8,225
 9,406
 8,157
 7,201
 
Other yen-denominated liabilities113,994
 98,590
 86,853
 107,761
 93,456
 82,504
 
Consolidated yen-denominated net assets
(liabilities) subject to foreign currency
fluctuation
(2)
$(10,346) $(10,122) $(10,134) $(8,361) $(8,647) $(9,155) 
(1) Actual period-end exchange rate
(2) Does not include the U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds for which the Company has entered into foreign currency derivatives as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A
(3) Does not include U.S. dollar-denominated bonds that have corresponding cross-currency swaps in consolidated VIEs

The Company is required to consolidate certain VIEs. Some of the issuer. We monitor NRSRO actionsconsolidated VIEs in Aflac Japan's portfolio use foreign currency swaps to convert foreign denominated cash flows to yen, the functional currency of Aflac Japan, in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations. Foreign currency swaps exchange an initial principal amount in two currencies, agreeing to re-exchange the currencies at a future date, at an agreed upon exchange rate. There may also be periodic exchanges of payments at specified intervals based on the agreed upon rates and notional amounts. Prior to consolidation, the Company's beneficial interest in these VIEs was a yen-denominated available-for-sale fixed maturity security. Upon consolidation, the original yen-denominated investment was derecognized and the likely actions for ourunderlying fixed maturity securities and cross-currency swaps were recognized. The combination of a U.S. dollar-denominated investment exposures, as well as overall market conditions. By performing these analyses, we makeand cross-currency swap economically creates a determinationyen-denominated investment and has no impact on the probability of timely payment of principal and interestCompany's net investment hedge position.

Similarly, the combination of the issuersU.S. corporate bonds and the foreign currency forwards and options that the Company has entered into, as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of our investments.MD&A, economically creates a yen-denominated investment that qualifies for inclusion as a component of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan for net investment hedge purposes.


SomeFor additional information regarding the Company's Aflac Japan net investment hedge, see the Hedging Activities subsection of our peripheral Eurozone fixed-maturity investments contain covenants that we believe mitigate our riskMD&A.


80


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

The Company's primary interest rate exposure is to the issuer. These covenants could include put options that allow us to return our holdings to the issuer at a predetermined price, usually par, should the issuer be downgraded to below investment grade by a rating agency. Additionally, these covenants may include restrictionsimpact of changes in interest rates on the abilityfair value of its investments in debt securities. The Company monitors its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis utilizing a full valuation methodology, measuring price volatility, and sensitivity of the issuerfair values of its investments to incur additionalinterest rate changes on the debt sell assets, or provide collateral for indebtedness. Assecurities the Company owns. For example, if the current duration of December 31, 2015,a debt security is 10 years, then the fair value of that security will increase by approximately 10% if market interest rates decrease by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant. Likewise, the fair value of the issuersdebt security will decrease by approximately 10% if market interest rates increase by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant.

The estimated effect of our holdings from peripheral Eurozone countries were currentpotential increases in interest rates on their obligations to us,the fair values of debt securities the Company owns; derivatives, excluding credit default swaps, and we believe they have the ability to meet their obligations to us.

As of December 31, 2015, our investments in peripheral Eurozone countries totaled $2.8 billion, or 2.9% of our total debt and perpetual securities, at amortized cost. We have no direct exposure to Greece. Apart from our direct investments in peripheral Eurozone sovereign debt totaling $262 million, our other exposuresnotes payable as of December 31 2015 follows:

Sensitivity of Fair Values of Financial Instruments
to Interest Rate Changes
  2018 2017
(In millions)Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
 Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
Assets:             
Debt securities:             
     Fixed maturity securities:             
          Yen-denominated $85,622
  $73,673
   $83,682
  $72,146
 
          Dollar-denominated 33,995
  31,327
   38,703
  35,518
 
             Total debt securities $119,617
  $105,000
   $122,385
  $107,664
 
Loans and loan receivables(1)
 $6,893
  $6,834
   $2,987
  $2,932
 
Derivatives $417
  $614
   $330
  $533
 
Liabilities:             
Notes payable(2)
 $5,876
  $5,415
   $5,553
  $4,900
 
Derivatives 387
  422
   474
  293
 
(1)Includes TREs, CMLs and MMLs, excludes policy loans
(2)Excludes capitalized lease obligations

There are various factors that affect the European sovereignfair value of the Company's investment in debt crisis were investmentssecurities. Included in peripheral Eurozone banks and financial institutions of $488 million, peripheral Eurozone non-banks (excluding sovereigns) of $2.0 billion, core Eurozone1 banks and financial institutions of $1.7 billion, core Eurozone non-banks (excluding sovereigns) of $4.2 billion, core Eurozone sovereigns of $486 million, and non-Eurozone2 holdings throughoutthose factors are changes in the prevailing interest rate environment, which directly affect the balance of Europeunrealized gains or losses for a given period in relation to a prior period. Decreases in market yields generally improve the fair value of $5.0 billion, all at amortized cost. Other investment risks stemming from the European sovereign debt crisis that are not possible to measure and include the impact of slower economic activity throughout Europe and itssecurities, while increases in market yields generally have a negative impact on global economic growththe fair value of the Company's debt securities. However, the Company does not expect to realize a majority of any unrealized gains or losses. For additional information on unrealized losses on debt securities, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac Japan's yen-denominated assets and market disruption including illiquidityliabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)2018 2017 
Yen-denominated debt securities16
 15
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years15
 14
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force10
 10
 


81


Item 7A. Quantitative and impaired valuations due to heightened concernsQualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac U.S. dollar-denominated assets and lackliabilities, along with premiums, as of investor confidence.December 31.
Although
(In years)2018 2017 
Dollar-denominated debt securities9
 10
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years8
 8
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force6
 6
 

The following table shows a comparison of average required interest rates for future policy benefits and investment yields, based on amortized cost, for the situation had largely stabilized across Europe, the crisis in Greeceyears ended December 31.
Comparison of Interest Rates for Future Policy Benefits
and Investment Yields
(Net of Investment Expenses)
  201820172016
  U.S.        JapanU.S.        JapanU.S.        Japan
Policies issued during year:                  
Required interest on policy reserves 3.69%  1.00%
(1) 
 3.69%  1.10%
(1) 
 3.67%  1.38%
(1) 
New money yield on investments 4.44
  2.94
  4.41
  1.88
  3.81
  1.30
 
Policies in force at year-end:                  
Required interest on policy reserves 5.34
  3.29
(1) 
 5.43
  3.38
(1) 
 5.51
  3.49
(1) 
Portfolio book yield, end of period 5.44
  2.49
  5.44
  2.46
  5.52
  2.52
 
(1)Represents investments for Aflac Japan that re-emerged in mid-2015 demonstrates certain risks remain as the areasupport policy obligations and therefore excludes Aflac Japan’s annuity products

The Company continues working to improve its economic footing.  We continue to monitor the situationspread between its new money yield and the required interest assumption for newly issued products in both the United States and Japan and will re-evaluate those assumptions as necessary. Currently, when investments the Company owns mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that of the interest required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. Overall, adequate profit margins exist in Aflac Japan's aggregate block of business because of changes in the mix of business and favorable experience from mortality, morbidity and expenses.

Periodically, the Company may enter into derivative transactions to hedge interest rate risk, depending on general economic conditions.

For further information on interest rate derivatives, see Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Credit Risk

A significant portion of the Company's investment portfolio consists of debt securities and loans that expose it to the credit risk of the underlying issuer or borrower. The Company carefully evaluates this risk on every new investment and closely includingmonitors the heightened interrelationship between political, monetary, fiscal,credit risk of its existing investment portfolio. The Company incorporates the needs of its products and economic forces;liabilities, the paceoverall requirements of underlying structural reforms; the possibility of continued contagion to additional sovereignsbusiness, and other entities; further stress onfactors in addition to its underwriting of the banking systems throughoutcredit risk for each investment in the region; and the impact onportfolio.

Evaluating the underlying economic fundamentals throughoutrisks in the Eurozone.Company's credit portfolio involves a multitude of factors including but not limited to its assessment of the issuer's or borrower's business activities, assets, products, market position, financial condition, and future prospects. The Company incorporates the assessment of the NRSROs in assigning credit ratings and incorporates the rating methodologies of its specialist external managers in assigning loan ratings to portfolio holdings. The Company performs extensive internal assessments of the credit risks for all its portfolio holdings and potential new investments, which includes using analyses provided by the Company's specialist external managers. For assets managed by external asset managers, the Company provides investment and credit risk parameters that must be used when making investment decisions and require ongoing monitoring and reporting from the asset managers on significant changes in credit risks within the portfolio.





82
1Core Eurozone includes Germany, France, Netherlands, Austria, Belgium, Finland and Luxembourg.
2Non-Eurozone Europe includes the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Czech Republic and Poland.


64




Investment Concentrations

The Company's 15 largest global investment exposures were as follows:

Largest Global Investment Positions
(In millions)
December 31, 2018
    Total % of Total  
No. Consolidated Corporate/Sovereign Exposure Consolidated Fixed Maturity Credit
    Book Value Securities Rating
1 
Japan National Government (1)
 $51,207
 47.78% A+
2 Bank of America NA 411
 .38
  
      Bank of America Corp. 231
 .21
 A-
      Bank of America Corp. 180
 .17
 BBB+
3 Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. 405
 .38
 A-
4 Investcorp SA 383
 .36
 BB
5 Republic of South Africa 360
 .34
 BB+
6 Banobras 333
 .31
 BBB+
7 Nordea Bank AB 302
 .28
  
      Nordea Bank AB 231
 .21
 A-
      Nordea Bank AB 71
 .07
 BBB+
8 AXA 293
 .27
 BBB+
9 Deutsche Telekom AG 291
 .27
 BBB+
10 Japan Expswy Hld and Debt 291
 .27
 A+
11 CFE 287
 .27
 BBB+
12 AT&T Inc. 281
 .27
 BBB
13 Czech Republic 270
 .25
 A+
14 Investor AB 270
 .25
 AA-
15 Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) 270
 .25
 BBB+
                   Subtotal $55,654
 51.93%  
  Total fixed maturity securities $107,174
 100.00%  
(1)JGBs or JGB-backed securities
As previously disclosed, the Company owns long-dated debt instruments in support of its long-dated policyholder obligations. Some of the Company's largest global investment holdings are positions that were purchased many years ago and increased in size due to merger and consolidation activity among the issuing entities. In addition, many of the Company's largest holdings are yen-denominated, therefore strengthening of the yen can increase its position in dollars, and weakening of the yen can decrease its position in dollars. The Company's global investment guidelines establish concentration limits for its investment portfolios.

Oil and Gas Exposure


As a result of the large decline in oil prices, there has been heightened attention to certain investments in the various energy sub-sectors related to oil and gas following a large increase in market volatility. Our portfolio includes holdings diversified across multiple sub-sectors of the oil and gas industry, spread among multiple geographies. The following table showstables show the breakout of our exposure to the oil and gas industry as of December 31.


2015 2018 
Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Fair
  Value
 Cost or Gross Gross   
 Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
(In millions) Cost Gains Losses Value
Securities available for sale,
carried at fair value:
                  
Fixed maturities:                  
Independent exploration and production $1,270
 $73
 $139
 $1,204
  $813
 $72
 $36
 $849
 
Integrated energy 575
 55
 27
 603
  426
 19
 30
 415
 
Midstream 1,246
 76
 144
 1,178
  1,059
 91
 38
 1,112
 
Oil field services 1,155
 27
 228
 954
  725
 9
 154
 580
 
Refiners 460
 6
 30
 436
  346
 4
 20
 330
 
Government owned - energy related 887
 182
 25
 1,044
  855
 167
 6
 1,016
 
Natural gas utilities 344
 53
 1
 396
  472
 49
 6
 515
 
Total fixed maturities 5,937
 472
 594
 5,815
 
Equity securities 3
 0
 0
 3
 
Total securities available for sale 5,940
 472
 594
 5,818
  4,696
 411
 290
 4,817
 
Securities held to maturity,
carried at amortized cost:
                  
Fixed maturities:                  
Integrated energy 242
 9
 0
 251
  234
 5
 0
 239
 
Government owned - energy related 249
 5
 0
 254
  270
 0
 8
 262
 
Natural gas utilities 207
 18
 0
 225
  360
 34
 0
 394
 
Total fixed maturities 698
 32
 0
 730
 
Total securities held to maturity 698
 32
 0
 730
  864
 39
 8
 895
 
Total securities available for sale
and held to maturity
 $6,638
 $504
 $594
 $6,548
 
Equity Securities:         
Independent exploration and production 2
 0
 0
 2
 
Integrated energy 8
 0
 0
 8
 
Oil field services 1
 0
 0
 1
 
Refiners 4
 0
 0
 4
 
Total equity securities 15
 0
 0
 15
 
Total securities $5,575
 $450
 $298
 $5,727
 


As of December 31, 2015, the weighted-average rating of our total fixed maturity oil and gas exposure is BBB, and 93% of this exposure is investment grade. Absent a major change in the outlook for oil prices, we expect the increase in market volatility surrounding these issuers to continue. This could lead to increased negative ratings activity from the public rating agencies for energy-related credit issuers. We do not currently expect our investments in these sub-sectors related to oil and gas to have a material impact on our results of operations.

Securities by Type of Issuance
We haveThe Company has investments in both publicly and privately issued securities. OurThe Company's ability to sell either type of security is a function of overall market liquidity which is impacted by, among other things, the amount of outstanding securities of a particular issuer or issuance, trading history of the issue or issuer, overall market conditions, and idiosyncratic events affecting the specific issue or issuer.


The following table details investment securities by type of issuance as of December 31.


65



Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations



Investment Securities by Type of Issuance
   2015   2014 
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair   
Value   
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair  
Value  
Publicly issued securities:               
Fixed maturities $68,528
   $74,933
   $65,830
   $74,190
 
Perpetual securities 77
   111
   107
   154
 
Equity securities 473
   489
   12
   19
 
      Total publicly issued 69,078
   75,533
   65,949
   74,363
 
Privately issued securities: (1)
               
Fixed maturities 25,573
   27,936
   26,797
   29,880
 
Perpetual securities 1,764
   1,836
   2,333
   2,515
 
Equity securities 7
   9
   7
   9
 
      Total privately issued 27,344
   29,781
   29,137
   32,404
 
      Total investment securities $96,422
   $105,314
   $95,086
   $106,767
 
   2018   2017 
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair   
Value   
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair  
Value  
Publicly issued securities:               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 $83,482
   $93,255
   $81,454
   $93,025
 
Equity securities (1)
 936
   936
   831
   1,006
 
      Total publicly issued 84,418
   94,191
   82,285
   94,031
 
Privately issued securities: (2)
               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 23,692
   26,362
   25,108
   29,360
 
Equity securities (1)
 51
   51
   15
   17
 
      Total privately issued 23,743
   26,413
   25,123
   29,377
 
      Total investment securities $108,161
   $120,604
   $107,408
   $123,408
 
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2) Includes Rule 144A securities

The Company held $1,202 million and $1,789 million of perpetual securities at fair value ($1,201 million and $1,462 million at amortized cost) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The perpetual securities the Company holds were largely issued by banks that are systemically important to the financial markets of the sovereign country of domicile of the issuer. Generally, the Company believes regulatory changes made in the banking industry following the Global Financial Crisis and the European Sovereign Crisis, including increased capital and liquidity requirements and a reduction of business risk, have improved overall bank creditworthiness. However, bank capital securities may be subject to varying bail-in/resolution regimes in their home countries, which may include conversion or write-down provisions when bank regulators determine that the institution has reached the point of non-viability. Such actions could result in lower cash flows and ratings downgrades of the affected securities, which in turn could result in a reduction of fair value of the securities and increase the Company’s regulatory capital requirements. These factors are an integral part of the Company's credit review process.

The following table details ourthe Company's privately issued investment securities as of December 31.
Privately Issued Securities
(Amortized cost, in millions)2015 20142018 2017 
Privately issued securities as a percentage of total investment securities28.4% 30.6%22.0% 23.4% 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan$24,602
 $26,468
$20,966
 $22,354
 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan as a percentage of total
investment securities
25.5% 27.8%19.4% 20.8% 
Reverse-Dual Currency Securities(1) 
(Amortized cost, in millions)2015 20142018 2017 
Privately issued reverse-dual currency securities$5,372
 $6,196
$5,120
 $5,669
 
Publicly issued collateral structured as reverse-dual currency securities1,303
 1,470
1,657
 1,390
 
Total reverse-dual currency securities$6,675
 $7,666
$6,777
 $7,059
 
Reverse-dual currency securities as a percentage of total investment
securities
6.9% 8.1%6.3% 6.6% 
(1)Principal payments in yen and interest payments in dollars


Aflac Japan has invested ina portfolio of privately issued securities to better match liability characteristics and secure higher yields than those available on Japanese government or other public corporate bonds. All of the yen-denominated privately issued securities we have purchased were rated investment grade at the time of purchase. Aflac Japan’s investments in yen-denominated privately issued securities consist primarily of non-Japanese issuers, are rated investment grade at purchase and have longer maturities, thereby allowing usthe Company to improve our asset/liability matching and our overall investment returns. These securities wereare generally either privately negotiated arrangements or were issued under medium-term note programs and have standard documentation commensurate with credit ratings of the issuer, except when internal credit analysis indicates that additional protective and/or event-risk covenants were required. Many of these investments

66


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

have protective covenants appropriate to the specific investment. These may include a prohibition of certain activities by the borrower, maintenance of certain financial measures, and specific conditions impacting the payment of ourthe Company's notes.
Below-Investment-Grade
Hedging Activities

The Company uses derivative contracts to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk and Split-Rated Securitiesinterest rate risk. Derivative hedges are designed to reduce risk on an economic basis while minimizing the impact on financial results. The Company’s derivative hedge programs vary depending on the type of risk being hedged.


We use specific criteriaForeign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Hedge Program
The Company has deployed the following hedging strategies to judgemitigate exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk:
1.
Aflac Japan hedges U.S. dollar-denominated investments back to yen (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
2.
Aflac Japan maintains certain unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, which serve as an economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
3.
The Parent Company designates yen-denominated liabilities (notes payable and loans) as non-derivative hedging instruments and designates certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedges of the Company’s net investment in Aflac Japan (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).
4.
The Parent Company enters into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency exchange rate risk related to dividend payments by its subsidiary, Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).

Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program
Aflac Japan buys U.S. dollar-denominated investments, typically corporate bonds, and hedges them back to yen with foreign currency forwards and options to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk. This economically creates yen assets that match yen liabilities during the credit qualitylife of both existingthe derivative and prospectiveprovides liquidity and capital relief. The currency risk being hedged is generally based on fair value of hedged investments. The ratings referenced infollowing table summarizes the tables below are based on the ratings designations providedU.S. dollar-denominated investments held by the major credit rating agencies (Moody's, S&P, and Fitch) or, if not rated, are determined based on our internal credit analysis of such securities. When the ratings issued by the rating agencies differ, we utilize the second lowest rating, regardless of how many of the three rating agencies actually rated the instrument. Split-rated securities are those where the ratings are not equivalent and one

66



or more of the ratings is investment grade and one or more is below investment grade. For these split-rated securities, if there are only two ratings assigned by the credit rating agencies, we take the lower below-investment-grade rating. If there are three ratings assigned, and two of the three are below investment grade, we consider it a below-investment-grade security. If there are three ratings and two are investment grade, we consider it an investment grade security unless our evaluation and assessment shows a below-investment-grade rating is warranted despite two of the three rating agencies rating it investment grade. 
Our portfolio of below-investment-grade securities includes debt securities purchased while the issuer was rated investment grade plus other loans and bonds purchased as part of an allocation to that segment of the market. The following is our below-investment-grade exposure in accordance with the above described rating methodologyAflac Japan as of December 31.

 2018 2017
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale securities:     
  Fixed maturity securities (excluding bank loans) (1)
$17,101
$17,003
 $17,972
$19,314
  Fixed maturity securities - bank loans (floating rate)1,296
1,238
 1,936
1,865
  Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
Equity securities (1), (2)
177
177
 147
173
Other investments:     
  Transitional real estate loans (floating rate)3,621
3,625
 986
984
  Commercial mortgage loans763
736
 767
753
  Middle market loans (floating rate)1,144
1,146
 527
530
  Alternative investments333
333
 97
97
      Total U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan$26,114
$26,527
 $24,082
$26,265
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. for the adoption of accounting guidance related to financial instruments effective January 1, 2018.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and $9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the U.S. dollar-denominated investments. The fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

67



Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Below-Investment-Grade Securities

Foreign exchange derivatives used for hedging are periodically settled, which results in cash receipt or payment at maturity or early termination. The Company had net cash settlements of $272 million, $(747) million and $1.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, associated with the currency derivatives used for hedging Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments.

The following table presents metrics related to Aflac Japan hedge costs as of December 31.

Aflac Japan Hedge Cost Metrics(1)
  2015 2014 
(In millions)
Par
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Gain
(Loss)
 
Par
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Gain(Loss)
 
Investcorp Capital
Limited
$357
 $357
 $324
 $(33) $357
 $357
 $332
 $(25) 
Commerzbank AG
(includes
Dresdner Bank)
332
 213
 321
 108
 332
 213
 327
 114
 
Republic of Tunisia307
 185
 243
 58
 307
 185
 219
 34
 
Navient Corp279
 148
 155
 7
 278
 278
 178
 (100) 
UPM-Kymmene257
 257
 252
 (5) 257
 257
 251
 (6) 
KLM Royal Dutch
  Airlines (1)
249
 183
 205
 22
 249
 183
 231
 48
 
Barclays Bank PLC (1)
230
 148
 228
 80
 228
 148
 225
 77
 
Deutsche Bank AG (2)
199
 199
 175
 (24) 378
(1) 
332
(1) 
354
(1) 
22
(1) 
DEPFA Bank PLC166
 166
 166
 0
 *
 *
 *
 *
 
Telecom Italia SpA166
 166
 214
 48
 332
 332
 352
 20
 
Generalitat de
Catalunya
149
 55
 126
 71
 149
 55
 129
 74
 
IKB Deutsche
  Industriebank AG
108
 46
 79
 33
 108
 46
 70
 24
 
Alcoa, Inc.100
 77
 81
 4
 76
 77
 102
 25
 
Weatherford Bermuda94
 92
 70
 (22) *
 *
 *
 *
 
Petrobras International
   Finance Company
91
 88
 64
 (24) *
 *
 *
 *
 
Societe Generale (1)
83
 61
 73
 12
 83
 61
 67
 6
 
Teck Resources Ltd.70
 69
 32
 (37) *
 *
 *
 *
 
Transocean Inc.68
 71
 38
 (33) *
 *
 *
 *
 
Eskom Holdings
Limited
50
 50
 43
 (7) *
 *
 *
 *
 
Kommunalkredit
Austria
25
 16
 18
 2
 108
 84
 88
 4
 
Bank of Ireland*
 *
 *
 *
 166
 166
 125
 (41) 
Energias de Portugal
  SA (EDP)
*
 *
 *
 *
 118
 116
 124
 8
 
Other Issuers (below
  $50 million in par
  value) (3)
308
 290
 259
 (31) 361
 378
 394
 16
 
          Subtotal (4)
3,688
 2,937
 3,166
 229
 3,887
 3,268
 3,568
 300
 
Senior secured bank
  loans (5)
1,400
 1,327
 1,362
 35
 562
 475
 549
 74
 
High yield corporate
  bonds (6)
609
 621
 581
 (40) 0
 0
 0
 0
 
          Grand Total$5,697
 $4,885
 $5,109
 $224
 $4,449
 $3,743
 $4,117
 $374
 
 2018 2017 2016
FX forward notional at end of period (in billions of dollars)(2)
9.9 9.3 11.8
Weighted average original tenor (in months)(3)
30.4 33.1 20.6
Weighted average remaining tenor (in months)(4)
21.4 27.7 18.5
Annualized amortized hedge costs (in basis points)(5)
241 211 149
Amortized hedge costs for period (in millions of dollars)(236) (228) (186)
* Investment grade at respective(1) See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of amortized hedge costs.
(2) Notional is reported net of any offsetting positions
(3) Tenor based on derivative's original execution date to settlement date
(4) Tenor based on period reporting date to settlement date
(1)(5) Includes perpetual security Based on annualized amortized hedge costs divided by average FX forward notional for the period
(2) 2014 includes notes issued by Deutsche Bank Capital Trust
Parent Company's Foreign Currency Hedge Program

The Company has designated certain yen-denominated liabilities and Deutsche Postbank AG; 2015 includes only notes issued by Deutsche Postbank AGforeign currency forwards and options of the Parent Company as accounting hedges of its net investment in Aflac Japan. The Company's consolidated yen-denominated net asset position was partially hedged at $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2018, with hedging instruments comprised completely of yen-denominated debt, compared with a hedge of $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2017, with hedging instruments comprised of $1.4 billion of yen-denominated debt and $.4 billion of foreign currency forwards and options.
(3) Includes 15 issuers
The Company makes its accounting designation of net investment hedge at the beginning of each quarter. If the total of the designated Parent Company non-derivative and derivative notional is equal to or less than the Company's net investment in 2015Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective, and 18 issuersthe currency exchange effect on the yen-denominated liabilities and the change in 2014estimated fair value of the derivatives are reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. The Company's net investment hedge was effective during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(4) Securities initially purchased as investment grade, but have subsequently been downgraded
In order to below investment grade
(5) Includes 201 issuers in 2015 and 196 in 2014; all issuers below $25 million in par value
(6)Includes 57 issuers in 2015; all issuers below $25 million in par value

We invest in senior secured bank loans primarily to U.S. corporate borrowers, most of which have below-investment-grade ratings. The program is managed externally by third party firms specializing in this asset class. This mandate requires a minimum average credit quality of BB-/Ba3, prohibits loan purchases rated below B/B2, and prohibitseconomically mitigate risks associated with the enterprise-wide exposure to any individual credit greater than 2%the yen and the level and volatility of hedge costs, the Parent Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts. By buying U.S. dollars and selling yen, the Parent Company is effectively lowering its overall economic exposure to the yen, while Aflac Japan's U.S dollar exposure remains reduced as a result of Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated hedge program that synthetically creates yen assets. Among other objectives, this strategy is intended to reduce the enterprise-wide hedge costs. In 2018, the portion of the program’s assets. The objectives ofenterprise-wide hedge costs reduction contributed by this strategy was $36 million. This activity is reported in the Corporate and other segment. As this program include enhancingevolves, the

68 Company will continue to evaluate the program’s efficacy, including third-party review.


Interest Rate Risk Hedge Program


yield on invested assets, achieving further diversification of credit risk, and mitigating
To mitigate the risk of risinginvestment income volatility, the Company economically hedges interest rates throughrate fluctuations for certain variable-rate investments. To manage interest rate risk associated with its U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan, the Company also utilizes interest rate swaptions.

For additional discussion of the risks associated with the foreign currency exposure refer to the Currency Risk section in Item 1A, specifically to the Risk Factors titled “The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate“ and “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity." For discussion of the Company’s view on the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan, refer to the Investments subsection within Item 1, Business.


68



See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's hedging activities.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The following table presents deferred policy acquisition costs by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 % Change     
Aflac Japan$6,384
 $6,150
 3.8%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.3,491
 3,355
 4.1
 
Total$9,875
 $9,505
 3.9% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s deferred policy acquisition costs increased 2.0% in yen during the year ended December 31, 2018.

See Note 6 of floating rate assets. Our investmentsthe Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's deferred policy acquisition costs.

Policy Liabilities
The following table presents policy liabilities by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 % Change       
Aflac Japan$92,791
 $89,132
 4.1%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.10,981
 10,625
 3.4
 
Other183
 138
 32.6
 
Intercompany eliminations (2)
(767) (748) 2.5
 
Total$103,188
 $99,147
 4.1% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s policy liabilities increased 2.3% in this programyen during the year ended December 31, 2018.
(2) Elimination entry necessary due to recapture of a portion of policy liabilities ceded externally, as a result of the reinsurance retrocession transaction as described in Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's policy liabilities.

Notes Payable
Notes payable totaled $1.4$5.8 billion at December 31, 2015,2018, compared with $501 million$5.3 billion at December 31, 2017.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semiannually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's notes payable.


69



Benefit Plans
Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. have various benefit plans. For additional information on the Company's Japanese and U.S. plans, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Policyholder Protection
Policyholder Protection Corporation

The Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. Legislation enacted regarding the framework of the Life Insurance Policyholder Protection Corporation (LIPPC) included government fiscal measures supporting the LIPPC. On March 30, 2012, the Diet approved legislation to enhance the stability of the LIPPC by extending the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2017. On November 25, 2016, Japan's Diet passed legislation that again extends the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2022. Effective April 2014, the annual LIPPC contribution amount for the total life industry was lowered from 40 billion yen to 33 billion yen.

Guaranty Fund Assessments

Under U.S. state guaranty association laws, certain insurance companies can be assessed (up to prescribed limits) for certain obligations to the policyholders and claimants of impaired or insolvent insurance companies that write the same line or similar lines of business. The amount of the guaranty fund assessment that an insurer is assessed is based on anits proportionate share of premiums in that state.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has estimated and recognized the impact of its share of guaranty fund assessments resulting from the liquidation of a long-term care insurer. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the assessment.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had no material letters of credit, standby letters of credit, guarantees or standby repurchase obligations. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on material unconditional purchase obligations that are not recorded on the Company's balance sheet.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. provide the primary sources of liquidity to the Parent Company through dividends and management fees. The following table presents the amounts provided for the years ended December 31.
Liquidity Provided by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. to Parent Company
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Dividends declared or paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.$1,817

$2,590
(1) 
$2,000
 
Management fees paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.204
 291
 260
 
(1) Includes securities of $622 at fair value which had a value of $656 at amortized cost basis.


The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to prior years due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018.

The primary uses of cash by the Parent Company are shareholder dividends, the repurchase of its common stock and interest on its outstanding indebtedness and operating expenses.

At the end of September 2018, the Company announced a change in its internal dividend policy which allows the
Company to increase the proportion of regulatory earnings transferred from Aflac U.S. and Aflac Japan to the Parent
Company. The Company intends to maintain higher than historical levels of capital and liquidity at the Parent Company with the goals of addressing the Company’s hedge costs and related potential need for collateral and mitigating against long-term weakening of the Japanese yen. Further, the Company plans to continue to maintain a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar based investments at Aflac Japan and consider whether the amount of such investments should be increased

70



or decreased relative to the Company’s view of economic equity surplus in Aflac Japan in light of potentially rising hedge costs and other factors. See Item 2., Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under “Forward-Looking Information,” for a description of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the Company in regards to its capital management intentions.

The Parent Company accesses debt security markets to provide additional sources of capital. In 2015,September 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC that allows the Company to issue an indefinite amount of debt securities, in one or more series, from time to time until September 2021. In August 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration with Japanese regulatory authorities that allows the Parent Company to conduct public offerings of bonds in Japan, including yen-denominated Samurai notes, up to 200 billion yen or its equivalent through August 2020. The shelf registration statement is for possible public offerings in Japan, but the bonds issued under the shelf may be transferred by the bondholders to U.S. persons in compliance with U.S. law. The Company believes outside sources for additional debt and equity capital, if needed, will continue to be available. For additional information, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The principal sources of cash for the Company's insurance operations are premiums and investment income. The primary uses of cash by the Company's insurance operations are investments, policy claims, commissions, operating expenses, income taxes and payments to the Parent Company for management fees and dividends. Both the sources and uses of cash are reasonably predictable.

When making an investment decision, the Company's first consideration is based on product needs. The Company's investment objectives provide for liquidity through the purchase of investment-grade debt securities. These objectives also take into account duration matching, and because of the long-term nature of the Company's business, the Company has adequate time to react to changing cash flow needs.

As a result of policyholder aging, claims payments are expected to gradually increase over the life of a policy. Therefore, future policy benefit reserves are accumulated in the early years of a policy and are designed to help fund future claims payments. The Company expects its future cash flows from premiums and its investment portfolio to be sufficient to meet its cash needs for benefits and expenses.

As of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company and Aflac had four lines of credit with third parties as well as two intercompany lines of credit. For additional information on the Company's lines of credit, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As part of our normal portfolio management and asset allocation process, we increased our allocation to higher yielding corporate bonds by approximately $644 million within the Aflac Japan portfolio and $120 million withinFHLB financing arrangement as discussed previously in the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A, Aflac U.S. portfolio. Most of these securities were rated below-investment-grade atborrowed and repaid $86 million during 2018.

The Company's financial statements convey its financing arrangements during the time of purchase, but we also purchased severalperiods presented. The Company has not engaged in material intra-period short-term financings during the periods presented that are currently rated investment grade which, becausenot otherwise reported in its balance sheet or disclosed therein. The Company was in compliance with all of market pricing, offer yields commensurate with below-investment-grade risk profiles. The objectivethe covenants of this allocation is to enhance our yield on invested assetsits notes payable and further diversify ourlines of credit risk. All investments must have a minimum rating of low BB using our above described rating methodology and are managed by our internal credit portfolio management team.

Excluding the senior secured bank loans and certain high yield corporate bonds discussed above that were rated below investment grade when initially purchased, below-investment-grade debt and perpetual securities represented 3.1% of total debt and perpetual securities at December 31, 2015,2018. The Company has not entered into transactions involving the transfer of financial assets with an obligation to repurchase financial assets that have been accounted for as a sale under applicable accounting standards, including securities lending transactions. See Notes 1, 3, and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Company's securities lending and derivative activities. With the exception of disclosed activities in those referenced footnotes and the Risk Factors entitled, "The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate" and "Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity," the Company does not have a known trend, demand, commitment, event or uncertainty that would reasonably result in its liquidity increasing or decreasing by a material amount. As of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company had $1.0 billion as a capital reserve and an additional $1.0 billion of contingent liquidity in order to mitigate liquidity risk of derivative positions that are reducing enterprise-wide foreign currency exposure. The Company's cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted cash on hand, money market instruments, and other debt instruments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased, all of which has minimal market, settlement or other risk exposure.

The following table presents the estimated payments by period of the Company's major contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018. The Company translated its yen-denominated obligations using the December 31, 2018, exchange rate. Actual future payments as reported in dollars will fluctuate with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate.

71



Distribution of Payments by Period
(In millions)
Total
Liability
(1)
 Total
Payments
 Less
Than
One Year
 
One to
Three Years
 Four to
Five Years
 After
Five Years
Future policy benefits liability (Note 7)(2)
$86,368
  $251,577
 $8,980
 $17,817
 $17,807
 $206,973
Unpaid policy claims liability (Note 7)(3)
4,584
  4,584
 2,950
 951
 387
 296
Other policyholders' funds (Note 7)(3)
7,146
 9,920
 321
 360
 581
 8,658
Long-term debt – principal (Note 9)
5,765
  5,813
 0
 45
 1,275
 4,493
Long-term debt – interest (Note 9)
37
  2,086
 175
 327
 284
 1,300
Cash collateral on loaned securities (Note 3)
1,052
 1,052
 1,052
 0
 0
 0
Operating service agreements (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
553
 165
 289
 99
 0
Operating lease obligations (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
202
 63
 82
 39
 18
Capitalized lease obligations (Note 9)
13
  13
 5
 5
 2
 1
Total contractual obligations$104,965
  $275,800
 $13,711
 $19,876
 $20,474
 $221,739
Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of $15 have been excluded from the tabular disclosure above because the timing of cash payment is not reasonably estimable.
(1)Liability amounts are those reported on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018.
(2)The estimated payments due by period reflect future estimated cash payments to be made to policyholders and others for future policy benefits. These projected cash outflows are based on assumptions for future policy persistency, mortality, morbidity, and other assumptions comparable with the Company's experience, consider future premium receipts on current policies in force, and assume market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs. These cash outflows are undiscounted with respect to interest and, as a result, the sum of the cash outflows shown for all years in the table of $251,577 exceeds the corresponding liability amount of $86,368. The Company has made significant assumptions to determine the future estimated cash outflows related to the underlying policies and contracts. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, actual cash outflow amounts and timing will differ, possibly materially, from these estimates.
(3)Includes assumptions as to the timing of policyholders reporting claims for prior periods and the amount of those claims. Actual amounts and timing of unpaid policy claims payments may differ significantly from the estimates above.
(4)Not applicable

For more information on the Company's major contractual obligations, see the applicable Note in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as indicated in the line items in the table above.

Consolidated Cash Flows

The Company translates cash flows for Aflac Japan's yen-denominated items into U.S. dollars using weighted-average exchange rates. In years when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars causes more dollars to be reported.

The following table summarizes consolidated cash flows by activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Operating activities$6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 
Investing activities(3,582) (5,431) (3,855) 
Financing activities(1,616) (2,065) (1,619) 
Exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents30
 0
 (4) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents$846
 $(1,368) $509
 

Operating Activities

Consolidated cash flow from operations decreased 1.9% in 2018, compared with 3.4%2017. The following table summarizes operating cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$4,916
 $4,959
 $4,605
 
Aflac U.S. and other operations1,098
 1,169
 1,382
 
Total$6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 


72



Investing Activities

Operating cash flow is primarily used to purchase investments to meet future policy obligations. The following table summarizes investing cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$(2,938) $(4,504) $(3,075) 
Aflac U.S. and other operations(644) (927) (780) 
Total$(3,582) $(5,431) $(3,855) 

Prudent portfolio management dictates that the Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. Currently, when the Company's fixed maturity securities mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. However, the long-term nature of the Company's business and its strong cash flows provide the Company with the ability to minimize the effect of mismatched durations and/or yields identified by various asset adequacy analyses. From time to time or when market opportunities arise, the Company disposes of selected fixed maturity securities that are available for sale to improve the duration matching of assets and liabilities, improve future investment yields, and/or re-balance its portfolio. As a result, dispositions before maturity can vary significantly from year to year.

As part of its overall corporate strategy, the Company announced in September 2018 that it intends to increase its original investment in the Aflac Ventures Fund from $100 million over three years to $250 million over three to four years, as opportunities emerge. These investments are included in equity securities or the other investments line in the consolidated balance sheets. The Aflac Ventures Fund is a subsidiary of Aflac Corporate Ventures which is reported in the "Corporate and other" business segment. The central mission of Aflac Corporate Ventures is to support the organic growth and business development needs of Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. with emphasis on digital applications designed to improve the customer experience, gain efficiencies, and develop new markets in an effort to enhance and defend long-term shareholder value.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on certain investment commitments.

Financing Activities

Consolidated cash used by financing activities was $1.6 billion in 2018, $2.1 billion in 2017 and $1.6 billion in 2016.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of its senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In January 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of .932% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 10-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

73




In February 2017, the Parent Company extinguished $650 million of 2.65% senior notes upon their maturity.

In October 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of subordinated debentures through a U.S. public debt offering. The debentures bear interest at an initial rate of 2.108% per annum through October 22, 2027, or earlier redemption. Thereafter, the rate of the interest of the debentures will be reset every five years at a rate of interest equal to the then-current JPY 5-year Swap Offered Rate plus 205 basis points. The debentures are payable semi-annually in arrears and have a 30-year maturity. The debentures are redeemable (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax events or certain rating agency events, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the debentures or (ii) in 10 years, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption. In November 2017, the Parent Company used a portion of net proceeds from the debenture offering to redeem $500 million of the Parent Company's 5.50% subordinated debentures due 2052. The pretax non-operating expense due to the early redemption of these notes was $13 million.

In September 2016, the Parent Company issued two series of senior notes totaling $700 million through a U.S. public debt offering. The first series, which totaled $300 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.875% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 10-year maturity. The second series, which totaled $400 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 30-year maturity.

In September 2016, the Parent Company entered into two series of senior unsecured term loan facilities totaling 30.0 billion yen. The first series, which totaled 5.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to the TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .20% and .60%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second series, which totaled 25.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .35% and .75%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In December 2016, the Parent Company completed a tender offer in which it extinguished $176 million principal of its 6.90% senior notes due 2039 and $193 million principal of its 6.45% senior notes due 2040. The pretax non-operating loss due to the early redemption of these notes was $137 million ($89 million after-tax, or $.21 per diluted share).

In September 2016, the Parent Company extinguished 8.0 billion yen of 2.26% fixed rate Uridashi notes upon their maturity and in July 2016, the Parent Company extinguished 15.8 billion yen of 1.84% fixed rate Samurai notes upon their maturity.

See Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the debt issuances discussed above.

See the preceding discussion in this Capital Resources and Liquidity section of MD&A for details and any outstanding balances as of December 31, 2018 for the Company's lines of credit and FHLB financing arrangement.

The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2014,2018.

Cash returned to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases was $2.1 billion in 2018, compared with $2.0 billion in 2017 and $2.1 billion in 2016.

The following tables present a summary of treasury stock activity during the years ended December 31.
Treasury Stock Purchased
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016 
Treasury stock purchases$1,301
 $1,351
 $1,422
 
Number of shares purchased:      
Open market28,949
 35,510
 43,236
 
Other392
 1,018
 660
 
   Total shares purchased29,341
 36,528
 43,896
 

74



Treasury Stock Issued
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016 
Stock issued from treasury:      
   Cash financing$58
 $33
 $46
 
   Noncash financing17
 59
 61
 
   Total stock issued from treasury$75
 $92
 $107
 
Number of shares issued1,939
 2,554
 3,704
 

Under share repurchase authorizations from the Company's board of directors, the Company purchased 28.9 million shares of its common stock in the open market in 2018, compared with 35.5 million shares in 2017 and 43.2 million shares in 2016. As of December 31, 2018, a remaining balance of 69.0 million shares of the Company's common stock was available for purchase under share repurchase authorizations by its board of directors. The Company currently plans to repurchase $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion of its common stock in 2019, assuming stable capital conditions and absent compelling alternatives. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Cash dividends paid to shareholders in 2018 of $1.04 per share increased 19.5% over 2017. The 2017 dividend paid of $.87 per share increased 4.8% over 2016. The following table presents the dividend activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Dividends paid in cash$793
 $661
 $658
 
Dividends through issuance of treasury shares8
 29
 27
 
Total dividends to shareholders$801
 $690
 $685
 

In January 2019, the board of directors announced a 3.8% increase in the quarterly cash dividend, effective with the first quarter of 2019. The first quarter 2019 cash dividend of $.27 per share is payable on March 1, 2019, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 20, 2019.

Regulatory Restrictions

Aflac and CAIC are domiciled in Nebraska and are subject to its regulations. Subsequent to the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, Aflac Japan is domiciled in Japan and subject to local regulations. See further discussion
below. The Nebraska Department of Insurance imposes certain limitations and restrictions on payments of dividends, management fees, loans and advances to the Parent Company. Under Nebraska insurance law, prior approval of the Nebraska Department of Insurance is required for dividend distributions that exceed the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. In addition, the Nebraska insurance department must approve service arrangements and other transactions within the affiliated group of companies. These regulatory limitations are not expected to affect the level of management fees or dividends paid to the Parent Company. (See below for discussion of restrictions imposed by Japanese insurance regulators.) A life insurance company’s statutory capital and surplus is determined according to rules prescribed by the NAIC, as modified by the insurance department in the insurance company’s state of domicile. Statutory accounting rules are different from U.S. GAAP and are intended to emphasize policyholder protection and company solvency. Similar laws apply in New York, the domiciliary jurisdiction of Aflac's New York insurance subsidiary. As of December 2016, CAIC was redomiciled from South Carolina to Nebraska.

The continued long-term growth of the Company's business may require increases in the statutory capital and surplus of its insurance operations. Aflac’s insurance operations may secure additional statutory capital through various sources, such as internally generated statutory earnings, capital contributions by the Parent Company from funds generated through debt or equity offerings, or reinsurance transactions. The NAIC’s RBC formula is used by insurance regulators to help identify inadequately capitalized insurance companies. The RBC formula quantifies insurance risk, business risk, asset risk and interest rate risk by weighing the types and mixtures of risks inherent in the insurer’s operations.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 560%. The 2018 RBC as filed is lower than Aflac U.S. standalone RBC due to the inclusion of Aflac Japan for the first quarter of 2018. The RBC charge reflects the business risk without any total adjusted capital (TAC). At December 31, 2017, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 831%, which included Aflac Japan. Aflac's RBC ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position, even reflecting the full negative impact of the U.S. Tax Act, which was fully adopted in 2018. This reduction occurs as a result of

75



writing down deferred tax assets and the increase in required capital due to the reduction in tax rates. However, Aflac expects to recover from this negative impact over a period of three to five years through additional statutory income, assuming that the additional income is fully retained. As of December 31, 2018, Aflac's total adjusted capital of $2.7 billion exceeded the company action level required capital and surplus of $.5 billion by $2.2 billion.

The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid to the Parent Company by Aflac without prior approval of Nebraska's director of insurance is the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. Dividends declared by Aflac during 2019 in excess of $1.3 billion would be considered extraordinary and require such approval. Following the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, the Company used extraordinary dividends as needed to actively manage to appropriate RBC levels that are lower yet sufficient to maintain ratings and support prudent capital management. See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the impact of permitted practices by the Nebraska Department of Insurance on the Company's statutory capital and surplus.

The NAIC considers its Solvency Modernization Initiative (SMI) process relating to updating the U.S. insurance solvency regulation framework to be ongoing. The SMI has focused on key issues such as capital requirements, governance and risk management, group supervision, reinsurance, statutory accounting and financial reporting matters. Many of these key issues have been finalized and/or are near completion; however, the NAIC still has some ongoing initiatives related to SMI, such as monitoring the international efforts on group capital requirements as well as RBC.In addition, the NAIC is also considering changes to investment risk factors. Any negative developments by the NAIC in these areas could result in increased capital requirements for the Company.

Aflac is subject to the NAIC’s Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA), effective January 1, 2015. Through the ORSA requirements, Aflac is expected to regularly, no less than annually, conduct an ORSA to assess the adequacy of its risk management framework, and its current and estimated projected future solvency position; internally document the process and results of the assessment; and provide a confidential high-level ORSA Summary Report annually to the lead state commissioner if the insurer is a member of an insurance group. In November 2018, Aflac filed its ORSA report with the Nebraska Department of Insurance.

In addition to limitations and restrictions imposed by U.S. insurance regulators, after the Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, the new Japan subsidiary is required to meet certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law in order to provide dividends to the Parent Company. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at the Japan subsidiary is basically defined as retained earnings excluding capital reserves, which represent equity generated by capital profits that are statutorily required in Japan, less net after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities based on the previous fiscal year-end. These dividend capacity requirements are generally aligned with the solvency margin ratio (SMR). Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) maintains its own solvency standard which is quantified through the SMR. Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread, and foreign exchange rate changes, therefore the Company continues to evaluate alternatives for reducing this sensitivity. In the event of a rapid change in market risk conditions causing SMR to decline, the Company has two senior unsecured revolving credit facilities in the amounts of 100 billion yen and 55 billion yen, respectively, and a committed reinsurance facility in the amount of approximately 110 billion yen as a capital contingency plan. Additionally, the Company could take action to enter into derivatives on unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments with foreign currency options or forwards. (See Notes 8 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.)

The Company has already undertaken various measures to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR. For example, the Company employs policy reserve matching (PRM) investment strategies, which is a Japan-specific accounting treatment that reduces SMR interest rate sensitivity since PRM-designated investments are carried at amortized cost basis. Debtconsistent with corresponding liabilities. In order for a PRM-designated asset to be held at amortized cost, there are certain criteria that must be maintained. The primary criteria relates to maintaining the duration of designated assets and perpetual securities classified as below investment grade at December 31, 2015 and 2014 were generally reportedliabilities within a specified tolerance range. If the duration difference is not maintained within the specified range without rebalancing, then a certain portion of the assets must be re-classified as available for sale and carriedheld at fair value.value with any associated unrealized gain or loss recorded in surplus. To rebalance, assets may need to be sold in order to maintain the duration with the specified range, resulting in realizing a gain or loss from the sale. For U.S. GAAP, PRM investments are categorized as available for sale. The Company also uses foreign currency derivatives to hedge a portion of its U.S. dollar-denominated investments.(See Notes 3, 4 and 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's investment strategies, hedging activities, and reinsurance, respectively.)


Aflac's SMR ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position. As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan's SMR was 965%, compared with 1,064% at December 31, 2017. As part of the conversion of Aflac Japan from a

76



branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018, the Company experienced an accounting-driven decline in the SMR of approximately 130 points, compared with the SMR as of December 31, 2017. The Company expects to be able to pay dividends out of certain accounts, thus restoring this accounting impact over an estimated three-year period.

The FSA has been conducting field testing with the insurance industry concerning the introduction of an economic value-based solvency regime. The field testing will assist the FSA in determining if an economic value-based solvency regime in Japan will be appropriate for the insurance industry.

Payments are made from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company for management fees, allocated expenses and remittances of earnings. Prior to the Aflac Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan paid allocated expenses and profit remittances to Aflac U.S. The following table details Aflac Japan remittances for the years ended December 31.

Aflac Japan Remittances
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan management fees paid to Parent Company$136
 $93
 $79
 
Expenses allocated to Aflac Japan (in dollars)24
 109
 106
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in dollars)808
 1,150
 1,286
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in yen)89.7
 129.3
 138.5
 

The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to prior years due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. See the preceding Hedging Activities subsection of this MD&A for discussion of Parent Company hedging of yen profit remittances. For additional information on regulatory restrictions on dividends, profit remittances and other transfers, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other

For information regarding commitments and contingent liabilities, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Additional Information

Investors should note that the Company announces material financial information in its SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls. In accordance with SEC guidance, the Company may also use the Investor Relations section of the Company's website (http://investors.aflac.com) to communicate with investors about the Company. It is possible that the financial and other information the Company posts there could be deemed to be material information. The information on the Company's website is not part of this document.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed primarily to the following types of market risks: currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and equity risk. Fluctuations in these factors could impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The Company regularly monitors its market risks and uses a variety of strategies to manage its exposure
to these market risks.

Currency Risk

Aflac Japan

The functional currency of Aflac Japan's insurance operations is the Japanese yen. Aflac Japan’s premiums and a significant portion of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Most of Aflac Japan's cash and liabilities are yen-denominated.

77




As discussed above in the Investment subsection of Item 1, Business, the Company engages in hedging activities to mitigate certain currency risks from holding U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan. However, this hedging program in turn poses a countervailing long-term risk of loss on hedging currency derivatives under the long-term scenario of weakening yen, and related derivative rollover risk that could amplify hedge cost in unfavorable market conditions and significantly increase liquidity requirements to support negative derivative settlements. Additionally, as discussed in detail in the Risk Factors section titled “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity,” there is a risk that losses realized on derivative settlements during periods of weakening yen may not be recouped through realization of the corresponding holding currency gains on the hedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments if these investments are not ultimately converted to yen. The following table details Aflac Japan's portfolio allocation by currency as of December 31.

Japan Segment Portfolio Allocation by Currency
(In millions) 2018 2017 
  
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
USD program $24,435
$24,258
 $22,432
$23,716
 
Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen 1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
 
   Total dollar-denominated investments 26,114
26,527
 24,082
26,265
 
   Total yen-denominated investments 74,974
86,251
 72,369
84,379
 
      Total $101,088
$112,778
 $96,451
$110,644
 

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and $9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the U.S. dollar-denominated investments (USD Program). The fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

As noted above, in late 2017, the Company took steps to refine the strategy to mitigate currency exposure of Aflac Japan from U.S. dollar-denominated investments while balancing the consideration of the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan. This refinement in strategy resulted in an increased amount of the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan while at the same time mitigating hedge cost increases. Generally, Aflac Japan’s exposure to the currency risk increases when its portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments increases. This increases the volatility of the SMR and FSA earnings and may result in an adverse impact on these regulatory measures when yen appreciates relatively to U.S. dollar. This in turn may reduce Aflac Japan’s dividend capacity, as well as increase the level of capital needed to support increased SMR volatility. The adverse impact on the regulatory measures could be amplified by regulatory accounting rules requiring impairment loss recognition on prolonged significant declines in U.S. dollar relative to yen. Furthermore, under the scenario where unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments are needed to pay Aflac Japan’s yen-denominated obligations, they would have to be converted to yen, which could force realization of the then potential currency losses. As the value of the U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio in Aflac Japan fluctuates and the Company’s business model evolves, the Company periodically reevaluates this size of the unhedged portfolio and may accordingly adjust up or down its currency hedging targets.

Aflac Inc.

The Company is exposed to currency risk as an economic event when yen funds are actually converted into U.S. dollars. This occurs when yen-denominated funds are paid as dividends and management fees from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company and with quarterly settlements of its reinsurance retrocession transactions. The exchange rates prevailing at the time of yen payments will differ from the exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. A portion of the yen dividend and management fee payments may be used to service Aflac Incorporated's yen-denominated notes payable with the remainder converted into U.S. dollars.

In addition to yen payments and the reinsurance retrocessions, certain investment activities for Aflac Japan expose the Company to economic currency risk when yen are converted into U.S. dollars. As noted above, the Company invests a portion of its yen cash flows in U.S. dollar-denominated assets. This requires that the Company convert the yen cash flows to U.S. dollars before investing. As previously discussed, for certain of its U.S. dollar-denominated securities, the Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of hedged

78



investments. In 2018, the Parent Company entered into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency rate risk to dividend payments by Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. If the markets experience a significant strengthening of yen, this could cause cash strain at the Parent Company as a result of cash collateral and potentially cash settlement requirements. Based on the timing and severity of exchange rate fluctuations combined with the level of outstanding activity in this program, the cash strain at the Parent Company could be significant.
Aside from the activities discussed above, the Company generally does not convert yen into U.S. dollars; however, it does translate financial statement amounts from yen into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, reported amounts are affected by foreign currency fluctuations. The Company reports unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income. In periods when the yen weakens against the dollar, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes more U.S. dollars to be reported. The weakening of the yen relative to the U.S. dollar will generally adversely affect the value of the Company's yen-denominated investments in U.S. dollar terms. The Company also considers the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan and related exposure to foreign currency. The Company manages this currency risk by investing a portion of Aflac Japan's investment portfolio in U.S. dollar-denominated securities and by the Parent Company's issuance of yen-denominated debt (for additional information, see the discussion under the Investments subsection within Item 1, Business). As a result, the effect of currency fluctuations on the Company's net assets is reduced.
The following table demonstrates the effect of foreign currency fluctuations by presenting the dollar values of the Company's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, and its consolidated yen-denominated net asset exposure at selected exchange rates as of December 31.

79



Dollar Value of Yen-Denominated Assets and Liabilities
at Selected Exchange Rates
(In millions)2018 2017 
Yen/dollar exchange rates96.00
 
111.00 (1)

 126.00
 98.00
 
113.00(1)

 128.00
 
Yen-denominated financial instruments:            
Assets:            
Securities available for sale:            
Fixed maturity securities (2)
$55,600
 $48,086
 $42,362
 $51,504
 $44,666
 $39,433
 
Fixed maturity securities - consolidated
variable interest entities
 (3)
941
 814
 717
 1,089
 944
 834
 
Securities held to maturity:            
Fixed maturity securities35,055
 30,318
 26,709
 36,240
 31,430
 27,747
 
Equity securities742
 641
 565
 126
 109
 96
 
Equity securities - consolidated variable
interest entities
0
 0
 0
 675
 586
 517
 
Cash and cash equivalents988
 855
 753
 222
 193
 170
 
Derivatives2,712
 417
 949
 1,961
 331
 528
 
Other financial instruments253
 219
 192
 228
 198
 175
 
Subtotal96,291
 81,350
 72,247
 92,045
 78,457
 69,500
 
Liabilities:            
Notes payable2,120
 1,831
 1,615
 1,535
 1,331
 1,175
 
Derivatives1,318
 387
 2,138
 516
 474
 2,177
 
Subtotal3,438
 2,218
 3,753
 2,051
 1,805
 3,352
 
Net yen-denominated financial instruments92,853
 79,132
 68,494
 89,994
 76,652
 66,148
 
Other yen-denominated assets10,795
 9,336
 8,225
 9,406
 8,157
 7,201
 
Other yen-denominated liabilities113,994
 98,590
 86,853
 107,761
 93,456
 82,504
 
Consolidated yen-denominated net assets
(liabilities) subject to foreign currency
fluctuation
(2)
$(10,346) $(10,122) $(10,134) $(8,361) $(8,647) $(9,155) 
(1) Actual period-end exchange rate
(2) Does not include the U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds for which the Company has entered into foreign currency derivatives as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A
(3) Does not include U.S. dollar-denominated bonds that have corresponding cross-currency swaps in consolidated VIEs

The Company is required to consolidate certain VIEs. Some of the consolidated VIEs in Aflac Japan's portfolio use foreign currency swaps to convert foreign denominated cash flows to yen, the functional currency of Aflac Japan, in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations. Foreign currency swaps exchange an initial principal amount in two currencies, agreeing to re-exchange the currencies at a future date, at an agreed upon exchange rate. There may also be periodic exchanges of payments at specified intervals based on the agreed upon rates and notional amounts. Prior to consolidation, the Company's beneficial interest in these VIEs was a yen-denominated available-for-sale fixed maturity security. Upon consolidation, the original yen-denominated investment was derecognized and the underlying fixed maturity securities and cross-currency swaps were recognized. The combination of a U.S. dollar-denominated investment and cross-currency swap economically creates a yen-denominated investment and has no impact on the Company's net investment hedge position.

Similarly, the combination of the U.S. corporate bonds and the foreign currency forwards and options that the Company has entered into, as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A, economically creates a yen-denominated investment that qualifies for inclusion as a component of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan for net investment hedge purposes.

For additional information regarding the Company's Aflac Japan net investment hedge, see the Hedging Activities subsection of MD&A.


80



Interest Rate Risk

The Company's primary interest rate exposure is to the impact of changes in interest rates on the fair value of its investments in debt securities. The Company monitors its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis utilizing a full valuation methodology, measuring price volatility, and sensitivity of the fair values of its investments to interest rate changes on the debt securities the Company owns. For example, if the current duration of a debt security is 10 years, then the fair value of that security will increase by approximately 10% if market interest rates decrease by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant. Likewise, the fair value of the debt security will decrease by approximately 10% if market interest rates increase by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant.

The estimated effect of potential increases in interest rates on the fair values of debt securities the Company owns; derivatives, excluding credit default swaps, and notes payable as of December 31 follows:

Sensitivity of Fair Values of Financial Instruments
to Interest Rate Changes
  2018 2017
(In millions)Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
 Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
Assets:             
Debt securities:             
     Fixed maturity securities:             
          Yen-denominated $85,622
  $73,673
   $83,682
  $72,146
 
          Dollar-denominated 33,995
  31,327
   38,703
  35,518
 
             Total debt securities $119,617
  $105,000
   $122,385
  $107,664
 
Loans and loan receivables(1)
 $6,893
  $6,834
   $2,987
  $2,932
 
Derivatives $417
  $614
   $330
  $533
 
Liabilities:             
Notes payable(2)
 $5,876
  $5,415
   $5,553
  $4,900
 
Derivatives 387
  422
   474
  293
 
(1)Includes TREs, CMLs and MMLs, excludes policy loans
(2)Excludes capitalized lease obligations

There are various factors that affect the fair value of the Company's investment in debt securities. Included in those factors are changes in the prevailing interest rate environment, which directly affect the balance of unrealized gains or losses for a given period in relation to a prior period. Decreases in market yields generally improve the fair value of debt securities, while increases in market yields generally have a negative impact on the fair value of the Company's debt securities. However, the Company does not expect to realize a majority of any unrealized gains or losses. For additional information on unrealized losses on debt securities, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac Japan's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)2018 2017 
Yen-denominated debt securities16
 15
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years15
 14
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force10
 10
 


81



The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)2018 2017 
Dollar-denominated debt securities9
 10
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years8
 8
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force6
 6
 

The following table shows a comparison of average required interest rates for future policy benefits and investment yields, based on amortized cost, for the 10years ended December 31.
Comparison of Interest Rates for Future Policy Benefits
and Investment Yields
(Net of Investment Expenses)
  201820172016
  U.S.        JapanU.S.        JapanU.S.        Japan
Policies issued during year:                  
Required interest on policy reserves 3.69%  1.00%
(1) 
 3.69%  1.10%
(1) 
 3.67%  1.38%
(1) 
New money yield on investments 4.44
  2.94
  4.41
  1.88
  3.81
  1.30
 
Policies in force at year-end:                  
Required interest on policy reserves 5.34
  3.29
(1) 
 5.43
  3.38
(1) 
 5.51
  3.49
(1) 
Portfolio book yield, end of period 5.44
  2.49
  5.44
  2.46
  5.52
  2.52
 
(1)Represents investments for Aflac Japan that support policy obligations and therefore excludes Aflac Japan’s annuity products

The Company continues to monitor the spread between its new money yield and the required interest assumption for newly issued products in both the United States and Japan and will re-evaluate those assumptions as necessary. Currently, when investments the Company owns mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that of the interest required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. Overall, adequate profit margins exist in Aflac Japan's aggregate block of business because of changes in the mix of business and favorable experience from mortality, morbidity and expenses.

Periodically, the Company may enter into derivative transactions to hedge interest rate risk, depending on general economic conditions.

For further information on interest rate derivatives, see Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Credit Risk

A significant portion of the Company's investment portfolio consists of debt securities and loans that expose it to the credit risk of the underlying issuer or borrower. The Company carefully evaluates this risk on every new investment and closely monitors the credit risk of its existing investment portfolio. The Company incorporates the needs of its products and liabilities, the overall requirements of the business, and other factors in addition to its underwriting of the credit risk for each investment in the portfolio.

Evaluating the underlying risks in the Company's credit portfolio involves a multitude of factors including but not limited to its assessment of the issuer's or borrower's business activities, assets, products, market position, financial condition, and future prospects. The Company incorporates the assessment of the NRSROs in assigning credit ratings and incorporates the rating methodologies of its specialist external managers in assigning loan ratings to portfolio holdings. The Company performs extensive internal assessments of the credit risks for all its portfolio holdings and potential new investments, which includes using analyses provided by the Company's specialist external managers. For assets managed by external asset managers, the Company provides investment and credit risk parameters that must be used when making investment decisions and require ongoing monitoring and reporting from the asset managers on significant changes in credit risks within the portfolio.


82



Investment Concentrations

The Company's 15 largest global investment exposures were as follows:

Largest Global Investment Positions
(In millions)
December 31, 2018
    Total % of Total  
No. Consolidated Corporate/Sovereign Exposure Consolidated Fixed Maturity Credit
    Book Value Securities Rating
1 
Japan National Government (1)
 $51,207
 47.78% A+
2 Bank of America NA 411
 .38
  
      Bank of America Corp. 231
 .21
 A-
      Bank of America Corp. 180
 .17
 BBB+
3 Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. 405
 .38
 A-
4 Investcorp SA 383
 .36
 BB
5 Republic of South Africa 360
 .34
 BB+
6 Banobras 333
 .31
 BBB+
7 Nordea Bank AB 302
 .28
  
      Nordea Bank AB 231
 .21
 A-
      Nordea Bank AB 71
 .07
 BBB+
8 AXA 293
 .27
 BBB+
9 Deutsche Telekom AG 291
 .27
 BBB+
10 Japan Expswy Hld and Debt 291
 .27
 A+
11 CFE 287
 .27
 BBB+
12 AT&T Inc. 281
 .27
 BBB
13 Czech Republic 270
 .25
 A+
14 Investor AB 270
 .25
 AA-
15 Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) 270
 .25
 BBB+
                   Subtotal $55,654
 51.93%  
  Total fixed maturity securities $107,174
 100.00%  
(1)JGBs or JGB-backed securities
As previously disclosed, the Company owns long-dated debt instruments in support of its long-dated policyholder obligations. Some of the Company's largest global investment holdings are positions that were purchased many years ago and increased in size due to merger and consolidation activity among the issuing entities. In addition, many of the Company's largest holdings with a split rating,are yen-denominated, therefore strengthening of the yen can increase its position in dollars, and includesweakening of the determination betweenyen can decrease its position in dollars. The Company's global investment grade and belowguidelines establish concentration limits for its investment grade based onportfolios.

Geographical Exposure

The following table indicates the above methodologygeographic exposure of the Company's debt securities as of December 31, 2015.31.


Split-Rated Securities
83



(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Investment-Grade 
Status
Commerzbank AG (includes Dresdner Bank) $213
  Below Investment Grade
DEPFA Bank PLC 166
  Below Investment Grade
Telecom Italia SpA 166
  Below Investment Grade
Energias de Portugal SA (EDP) 117
  Investment Grade
Goldman Sachs Capital I 105
  Investment Grade
Barclays Bank PLC (1) 
 102
  Below Investment Grade
Weatherford Bermuda 92
  Below Investment Grade
Alcoa, Inc. 77
  Below Investment Grade
Chicago, Illinois 53
  Investment Grade
Eskom Holdings Limited 50
  Below Investment Grade
 2018 2017 
(In millions)Amortized Cost % of
Total
 Amortized Cost % of
Total
 
Japan$55,486
 51.8% $51,983
 48.8% 
United States and Canada (1)
29,371
 27.4
 31,052
 29.1
 
United Kingdom3,038
 2.8
 2,603
 2.4
 
Germany2,179
 2.0
 2,323
 2.2
 
France2,030
 1.9
 1,983
 1.9
 
Peripheral Eurozone2,165
 2.0
 2,312
 2.2
 
     Portugal215
 .2
 211
 .2
 
     Italy1,261
 1.2
 1,261
 1.2
 
     Ireland29
 .0
 32
 .0
 
     Spain660
 .6
 808
 .8
 
Nordic Region1,615
 1.6
 1,611
 1.5
 
     Sweden779
 .7
 725
 .7
 
     Norway378
 .4
 451
 .4
 
     Denmark270
 .3
 177
 .2
 
     Finland188
 .2
 258
 .2
 
Other Europe2,425
 2.3
 2,489
 2.3
 
     Netherlands1,206
 1.1
 1,183
 1.1
 
     Switzerland258
 .2
 307
 .3
 
     Czech Republic451
 .5
 442
 .4
 
     Austria125
 .1
 123
 .1
 
     Belgium178
 .2
 168
 .1
 
     Poland180
 .2
 177
 .2
 
     Luxembourg27
 .0
 89
 .1
 
Asia excluding Japan2,722
 2.5
 3,408
 3.2
 
Africa and Middle East2,018
 1.9
 2,460
 2.3
 
Latin America2,153
 2.0
 2,318
 2.2
 
Australia1,620
 1.5
 1,572
 1.5
 
All Others352
 .3
 448
 .4
 
     Total fixed maturity securities$107,174
 100.0% $106,562
 100.0% 
(1) Includes perpetual security

Split-rated securities, excluding the senior secured bank loan investments and high yield corporate bonds discussed above, totaled $1.3 billion and represented 1.3%total exposure to Puerto Rico of total debt and perpetual securities,$1 million of required deposits at amortized cost, atboth December 31, 2015, compared with $2.2 billion2018 and 2.3%,2017, respectively, of which 100% had principal and interest insurance at both December 31, 2014.2018 and 2017, respectively.

ForThe primary factor considered when determining the foreign currencydomicile of investment exposure is the legal country risk location of the issuer. However, other factors such as the location of the parent guarantor, the location of the company's headquarters or major business operations (including location of major assets), location of primary market (including location of revenue generation) and credit default swaps associated with our VIE investments for which we arespecific country risk publicly recognized by rating agencies can influence the primary beneficiary, we bearassignment of the country (or geographic) risk location. When the issuer is a special financing vehicle or a branch or subsidiary of foreign exchangea global company, then the Company considers any guarantees and/or credit loss duelegal, regulatory and corporate relationships of the issuer relative to counterparty default even though we are not a direct counterparty to those contracts. We areits ultimate parent in determining the proper assignment of country risk.


84



Derivative Counterparties
The Company is a direct counterparty to the foreign currency swaps that we have onit has entered into in connection with certain of ourits senior notes and subordinated debentures; foreign currency forwards; foreign currency options; and interest rate swaptions, therefore we arethe Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties in those contracts. For the foreign currency and credit default swaps associated with the Company's VIE investments for which it is the primary beneficiary, the Company bears the risk of foreign exchange and/or credit loss due to counterparty default even though it is not a direct counterparty to those contracts. The risk of counterparty default for ourthe Company's VIE and senior note and subordinated debenture swaps, foreign currency swaps, certain foreign currency forwards, andforeign currency options and interest rate swaptions is mitigated by collateral posting requirements the counterpartythat counterparties to those transactions must meet. If collateral posting agreements are not in place, the counterparty risk associated with foreign currency forwards and foreign currency options is the risk that at expiry of the contract, the counterparty is unable to deliver the agreed upon amount of yen at the agreed upon price or delivery date, thus exposing the companyCompany to additional unhedged exposure to U.S. dollars in the Aflac Japan investment portfolio. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.



69



Equity RiskDeferred Policy Acquisition Costs


Market pricesThe calculation of DAC and the liability for equity securitiesfuture policy benefits requires the use of estimates based on sound actuarial valuation techniques. For new policy issues, the Company reviews its actuarial assumptions and deferrable acquisition costs each year and revise them when necessary to more closely reflect recent experience and studies of actual acquisition costs. For policies in force, the Company evaluates DAC by major product groupings to determine that they are subjectrecoverable from future revenues, and any amounts determined not to fluctuation and consequently the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions. These fluctuations could impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Other-than-temporary Impairment
be recoverable are charged against net earnings. See Notes 1 and 3Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussiondetail of our impairment policy.the DAC activity for the past two years.
Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses
Policy Liabilities

The following table provides details of policy liabilities by segment and in total as of December 31.
Policy Liabilities
(In millions)2018 2017
Japan segment:   
Future policy benefits$77,812
 $73,661
Unpaid policy claims2,857
 2,692
Other policy liabilities12,122
 12,779
Total Japan policy liabilities$92,791
 $89,132
U.S. segment:   
Future policy benefits$9,137
 $8,806
Unpaid policy claims1,727
 1,700
Other policy liabilities117
 119
Total U.S. policy liabilities$10,981
 $10,625
Consolidated:   
Future policy benefits$86,368
 $81,857
Unpaid policy claims4,584
 4,392
Other policy liabilities12,236
 12,898
Total consolidated policy liabilities(1)
$103,188
 $99,147
(1) The sum of the Japan and U.S. segments exceeds the total due to reinsurance and retrocession activity.

The Company's policy liabilities, which are determined in accordance with applicable guidelines as defined under U.S. GAAP and Actuarial Standards of Practice, include two components that involve analysis and judgment: future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims, which accounted for 84% and 4% of total policy liabilities as of December 31, 2018, respectively.

Future policy benefits provide for claims that will occur in the future and are generally calculated as the present value of future expected benefits to be incurred less the present value of future expected net benefit premiums. The Company calculates future policy benefits based on amortized cost, fair valueassumptions of morbidity, mortality, persistency and unrealized gainsinterest. These assumptions are generally established at the time a policy is issued. The assumptions used in the calculations are closely

43



related to those used in developing the gross premiums for our investmentsa policy. As required by U.S. GAAP, the Company also includes a provision for adverse deviation, which is intended to accommodate adverse fluctuations in fixed maturities, perpetual securities,actual experience.

Unpaid policy claims include those claims that have been incurred and equity securitiesare in the process of payment as well as an estimate of those claims that have been incurred but have not yet been reported to the Company. The Company computes unpaid policy claims on a non-discounted basis using statistical analyses of historical claims payments, adjusted for current trends and changed conditions. The Company updates the assumptions underlying the estimate of unpaid policy claims regularly and incorporates its historical experience as well as other data that provides information regarding the Company's outstanding liability.

The Company's insurance products provide fixed-benefit amounts per occurrence that are not subject to medical-cost inflation. Furthermore, the Company's business is widely dispersed in both the United States and Japan. This geographic dispersion and the nature of the Company's benefit structure mitigate the risk of a significant unexpected increase in claims payments due to epidemics and events of a catastrophic nature. Claims incurred under Aflac's policies are generally reported and paid in a relatively short time frame. The unpaid claims liability is sensitive to morbidity assumptions, in particular, severity and frequency of claims. Severity is the ultimate size of a claim, and frequency is the number of claims incurred. The Company's claims experience is primarily related to the demographics of its policyholders.

As a part of its established financial reporting and accounting practices and controls, the Company performs detailed annual actuarial reviews of its policyholder liabilities (gross premium valuation, GPV, analysis) and reflects the results of those reviews in its results of operations and financial condition as required by investment-grade statusU.S. GAAP. For Aflac Japan, the Company's annual review in 2016 indicated that it needed to strengthen the liability associated with a block of care policies, primarily due to low investment yields. The Company strengthened its future policy benefits liability by $52 million in 2016 as a result of this review. Results of the Company’s annual review in 2018 and 2017 concluded that no further strengthening was required for these liabilities. For Aflac U.S., the Company's annual reviews in 2018, 2017 and 2016 indicated no need to strengthen liabilities associated with policies in the United States. In the U.S. and Japan, investment assumptions were reviewed in 2017 and the Company adopted expected forward rates in its GPV yield projections. In addition, in Japan, assets were allocated to blocks of business to align with yield and duration requirements of the businesses.

The table below reflects the growth of the future policy benefits liability for the years ended December 31.
Future Policy Benefits
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac U.S.$9,137
 $8,806
 $8,442
 
Growth rate3.8%
4.3%
4.4%
Aflac Japan$77,812
 $73,661
 $68,291
 
Growth rate5.6%
7.9%
9.7%
Consolidated$86,368
 $81,857
 $76,106
 
Growth rate5.5%
7.6%
9.2%
Yen/dollar exchange rate (end of period)111.00
 113.00
 116.49
 
Aflac Japan (in yen)8,637
 8,324
 7,955
 
Growth rate3.8%
4.6%
6.0%

The growth of the future policy benefits liability in yen for Aflac Japan and in dollars for Aflac U.S. has been due to the aging of the Company's in-force block of business and the addition of new business.

In computing the estimate of unpaid policy claims, the Company considers many factors, including the benefits and amounts available under the policy; the volume and demographics of the policies exposed to claims; and internal business practices, such as incurred date assignment and current claim administrative practices. The Company monitors these conditions closely and make adjustments to the liability as actual experience emerges. Claim levels are generally stable from period to period; however, fluctuations in claim levels may occur. In calculating the unpaid policy claim liability, the Company does not calculate a range of estimates. The following table shows the expected sensitivity of the unpaid policy claims liability as of December 31, 2015.2018, to changes in severity and frequency of claims.

44



Sensitivity of Unpaid Policy Claims Liability
(In millions)Total
Amortized
Cost
 Total
Fair
Value
 Percentage
of Total 
Fair Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross        
Unrealized        
Losses        
Available-for-sale fixed maturities and
perpetual securities:
                   
  Investment-grade securities $57,764
   $62,353
   59.2%   $6,091
   $1,502
 
  Below-investment-grade securities 4,719
   4,943
   4.6
   514
   290
 
Held-to-maturity fixed maturities:                   
  Investment-grade securities 33,293
   37,354
   35.5
   4,278
   217
 
  Below-investment-grade securities 166
   166
   .2
   0
   0
 
Equity securities 480
   498
   .5
   22
   4
 
Total $96,422
   $105,314
   100.0%   $10,905
   $2,013
 
(In millions) Total Severity 
Total FrequencyDecrease
by 2%
 Decrease
by 1%
 Unchanged Increase
by 1%
 Increase
by 2%
Increase by 2% $0
   $25
   $50
   $75
   $101
 
Increase by 1% (24)   0
   25
   50
   75
 
Unchanged (49)   (25)   0
   25
   50
 
Decrease by 1% (73)   (49)   (25)   0
   25
 
Decrease by 2% (97)   (73)   (49)   (24)   0
 


Other policy liabilities, which accounted for 12% of total policy liabilities as of December 31, 2018, consisted primarily of annuity and unearned premium reserves, and discounted advance premiums on deposit from policyholders in conjunction with their purchase of certain Aflac Japan insurance products. These advanced premiums are deferred upon collection and recognized as premium revenue over the contractual premium payment period. Advanced premiums represented 29% and 34% of the December 31, 2018 and 2017 other policy liabilities balances, respectively. See the Aflac Japan segment subsection of this MD&A for further information.

Income Taxes

Income tax provisions are generally based on pretax earnings reported for financial statement purposes, which differ from those amounts used in preparing the Company's income tax returns. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the Company expects the temporary differences to reverse. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with U.S. GAAP is a two-step process. Under the first step, the enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The second step is measurement, whereby a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that an amount will not be realized. The determination of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets requires management to make certain judgments and assumptions.

In evaluating the ability to recover deferred tax assets, the Company's management considers all available evidence, including taxable income in open carry back years, the existence of cumulative losses in the most recent years, forecasted earnings, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, future taxable temporary difference reversals, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In the event the Company determines it is not more likely than not that it will be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, a valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Likewise, if it is later determined that it is more likely than not that those deferred tax assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed. Future economic conditions and market volatility, including increases in interest rates or widening credit spreads, can adversely impact the Company’s tax planning strategies and in particular the Company’s ability to utilize tax benefits on previously recognized capital losses. The Company's judgments and assumptions are subject to change given the inherent uncertainty in predicting future performance and specific industry and investment market conditions.

The Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, effective January 1, 2018 the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated or reduced certain deductions and credits, and limited the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation.

The Tax Act also transitions international corporate taxation from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system, which in light of the current tax treatment of Aflac Japan has the effect of subjecting the earnings of Aflac Japan to Japan taxation and subjecting the Company’s other earnings, including the consolidated earnings of the Parent Company, to U.S. taxation.

These changes became effective on January 1, 2018. Because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the period of enactment, during the period ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recorded, as its reasonable estimate, a net deferred tax liability reduction of $1.9 billion as of that date. While the Company believes that this estimate was reasonable, it is relying upon guidance provided by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118) that provided a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date of December 22, 2017, in order to complete the accounting for the effects of the Tax Act. This estimate was subject to new and

45



changing regulations, interpretations and tax guidance in the future, as well as further refinement of the Company’s calculations and changes in the interpretations and assumptions that the Company had made. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability.
For additional information on income tax, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this report.

Future Adoption of Accounting Standard for Long-Duration Insurance Contracts

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-12, “Financial Services - Insurance, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts.” The update, which is expected to significantly change how insurers account for long-duration contracts, amends existing recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements applicable to the Company. Issues addressed in the new guidance include: 1) a requirement to review and, if there is a change, update assumptions for the liability for future policy benefits at least annually, and to update the discount rate assumption quarterly, 2) accounting for market risk benefits at fair value, 3) simplified amortization for deferred acquisition costs, and 4) enhanced financial statement presentation and disclosures. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application of the amendments is permitted, however, the Company does not expect to early adopt the updated standard.

The Company is thoroughly evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2018-12 and expects that the adoption will have a significant impact on the Company’s reported financial position, results of operations, and disclosures under U.S. GAAP accounting. The Company anticipates that the requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits will have a significant impact on its results of operations, while the requirement to update the discount rate will have a significant impact on its accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and equity. There are two permitted transition methods upon adoption, full retrospective and modified retrospective. Under the full retrospective method, the Company would restate all historical periods based upon actual historical experience as of contract inception and its updated view of the contractual cash flow projections at transition. A cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings would be recognized to reflect the actual experience and updated projections. The update of the discount rate would be recognized in AOCI. The Company will be permitted to apply a full retrospective transition approach if actual historical information is available for all contracts that will be affected by the new guidance. Under the modified retrospective method, the opening reserve balance at the transition date, January 1, 2019, would generally be the same as the closing balance before transition, updated for changes in the discount rate.

The Company expects that under either transition method, the impact to its reported financial statements under U.S. GAAP will be greatly influenced by the nature of the Company’s business model. Adoption of the new guidance under either method will reflect the Company’s concentration in Japan third-sector business, in particular cancer insurance, with respect to which the duration of liabilities is materially longer than asset durations. Depending on the transition method chosen upon adoption, the impact of a low discount rate applied to long-duration third sector liabilities is recognized at adoption, while associated favorable morbidity margins are recognized over time thus driving a pronounced timing impact to U.S. GAAP equity. In addition, with respect to the Japan segment, the Company maintains a large portfolio of assets designated as held-to-maturity (HTM) as a strategy to reduce capital (solvency margin ratio or SMR) volatility. In a low interest rate environment, such as presently exists in Japan, assets designated as HTM that were purchased in a higher interest rate environment have significant embedded gains not reflected in AOCI, which serves as an economic offset to a low discount rate applied to policy liabilities. At December 31, 2018, the Company’s HTM portfolio was $30.3 billion at amortized cost and had $6.5 billion in net unrealized gains. After adoption of the new guidance, the Company also expects net earnings and net earnings per share (which were $2.9 billion and $3.77 per diluted share, respectively, in 2018) to reflect larger quarterly fluctuations due to the new requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits.

As an example of the potential impact of the new guidance, and for illustrative purposes only, under the modified retrospective method and in a low interest rate environment, the Company would expect AOCI (which was $2.2 billion at December 31, 2018) to significantly decline upon adoption and to thereafter reflect larger quarterly fluctuations due to the new requirement to quarterly adjust discount rates. Conversely, in a higher interest rate environment, and again assuming adoption of the modified retrospective method for illustrative purposes, the Company would expect AOCI to decline less or even increase (depending on the specifics of the interest rate environment), as well as to reflect quarterly fluctuations. Under the full retrospective method, the Company would expect lesser declines or increases in total equity upon adoption

46



compared to the modified retrospective method due to the potential offsetting effect from updating experience and cash flow projections

The ultimate impact on these items from the Company’s implementation of the updated standard is subject to assessments that are dependent on many variables, including but not limited to (i) the transition method selected by the Company, which the Company continues to evaluate, (ii) how certain aspects of the new standard will be interpreted and implemented by the Company and other similar companies, such as (but not limited to) amortization of deferred acquisition costs, as well as establishment of policies, processes and controls for setting, monitoring and periodically updating reserve assumptions, and (iii) changes in the interest rate environment in the US and Japan.

The Company is in the early stages of reviewing transition methods and has only begun to assess the full impact of adoption; as such, the Company expects to provide periodic updates on its continuing assessment. However, the Company expects that while the adoption of this new accounting guidance will affect the Company’s financial statements under U.S. GAAP, it will not impact financial statements for Aflac Japan under FSA requirements or for Aflac U.S. under applicable statutory requirements. Therefore, the Company does not expect adoption of the updated standard to impact its subsidiaries’ dividend capacity or their ability to meet applicable regulatory capital standards, nor does the Company anticipate adoption to affect its strategies for capital deployment.

New Accounting Pronouncements

During the last three years, various accounting standard-setting bodies have been active in soliciting comments and issuing statements, interpretations and exposure drafts. For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on the Company's financial position or results of operations, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion includes references to the Company's performance measures, adjusted earnings, adjusted earnings per diluted share, and amortized hedge costs, which are not calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These measures exclude items that the Company believes may obscure the underlying fundamentals and trends in the Company's insurance operations because they tend to be driven by general economic conditions and events or related to infrequent activities not directly associated with its insurance operations. The Company's management uses adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share to evaluate the financial performance of its insurance operations on a consolidated basis, and the Company believes that a presentation of these measures is vitally important to an understanding of its underlying profitability drivers and trends of its insurance business. The Company believes that amortized hedge costs, which are a component of adjusted earnings, measure the periodic currency risk management costs associated with hedging a portion of Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments and are an important component of net investment income.

In 2018, the Company began utilizing the term “adjusted earnings” for the measure formerly referred to as "operating earnings" on both a pretax and after-tax basis, as well as an absolute and per-share basis. This change only pertained to the label of the measure and did not alter its definition or calculation.

Aflac defines adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as the profits derived from operations. The most comparative U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings. Adjusted earnings are adjusted revenues less benefits and adjusted expenses. The adjustments to both revenues and expenses account for certain items that cannot be predicted or that are outside management’s control. Adjusted revenues are U.S. GAAP total revenues excluding realized investment gains and losses, except for amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies. Adjusted expenses are U.S. GAAP total acquisition and operating expenses including the impact of interest cash flows from derivatives associated with notes payable but excluding any nonrecurring or other items not associated with the normal course of the Company’s insurance operations and that do not reflect Aflac’s underlying business performance.

The Company defines adjusted earnings per share (basic or diluted) to be adjusted earnings for the period divided by the weighted average outstanding shares (basic or diluted) for the period presented. The most comparable U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings per share.

Amortized hedge costs represent costs incurred in using foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the foreign exchange risk of a portion of U.S. dollar-denominated assets in the Company’s Japan segment investment portfolio. These amortized hedge costs are derived from the difference between the foreign currency spot rate at time of trade

47



inception and the contractual foreign currency forward rate, recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the hedge. There is no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for amortized hedge costs.

Because a significant portion of the Company's business is conducted in Japan and foreign exchange rates are outside of management’s control, the Company believes it is important to understand the impact of translating Japanese yen into U.S. dollars. Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior year period, which eliminates fluctuations driven solely by yen-to-dollar currency rate changes.

The following table presents an agingis a reconciliation of fixed maturities, perpetual securities,items impacting adjusted earnings and equity securities in an unrealized loss position asadjusted earnings per diluted share to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures of net earnings and net earnings per diluted share, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2015.31.
AgingReconciliation of Unrealized LossesNet Earnings to Adjusted Earnings(1)
 (In millions)Total
Amortized
Cost
 Total
Unrealized
Loss
 Less than Six Months Six Months to Less
than 12 Months
 12 Months
or Longer
 
 Amortized
Cost
 Unrealized
Loss
 Amortized
Cost
 Unrealized
Loss
 Amortized
Cost
 Unrealized
Loss
 
Available-for-sale fixed
maturities and
  perpetual securities:
               
 Investment-grade
securities
$17,746
 $1,502
 $3,801
 $141
 $9,753
 $719
 $4,192
 $642
 Below-
investment-grade
securities
2,190
 290
 809
 33
 443
 53
 938
 204
 Held-to-maturity
fixed maturities:
               
 Investment-grade
securities
4,295
 217
 1,102
 27
 1,468
 63
 1,725
 127
 Equity securities195
 4
 195
 4
 0
 0
 0
 0
 Total$24,426
 $2,013
 $5,907
 $205
 $11,664
 $835
 $6,855
 $973
 In Millions Per Diluted Share
 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net earnings$2,920
 $4,604
 $2,659
 $3.77
 $5.77
 $3.21
Items impacting net earnings:           
Realized investment (gains) losses (2),(3),(4),(5)
297
 0
 (87) .38
 .00
 (.10)
Other and non-recurring (income) loss75
 69
 137
 .10
 .08
 .16
Income tax (benefit) expense on items
excluded from adjusted earnings
(83) (24) (18) (.11) (.03) (.02)
Tax reform adjustment (6)
18
 (1,933) 0
 .02
 (2.42) .00
Adjusted earnings3,226
 2,716
 2,691
 4.16
 3.40
 3.25
Current period foreign currency impact (7)
(28) N/A
 N/A
 (.04) N/A
 N/A
Adjusted earnings excluding current period
foreign currency impact
(8)
$3,198
 $2,716
 $2,691
 $4.13
 $3.40
 $3.25

(1) "Adjusted earnings" was formerly referred to as "operating earnings." Amounts may not foot due to rounding.
(2) Excludes amortized hedge costs of $236 in 2018, $228 in 2017 and $186 in 2016, related to hedging U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan which are classified as a component of adjusted earnings to conform to current year reporting. See "Hedge Costs" discussion below for further information.
(3) Amortized hedge costs in Aflac Japan were partially offset by derivatives entered into as part of corporate activities and resulted in a benefit of $36 in 2018, which has been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and reported as an increase in net investment income when analyzing operations.
(4) An immaterial amount of net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies in 2018 have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) into net investment income when analyzing operations.
(5) Excludes a gain of $67 in 2018, $77 in 2017 and $85 in 2016, related to the interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on notes payable which is classified as an operating gain when analyzing segment operations
(6) The impact of Tax Reform was estimated in 2017, and adjustments were recorded in 2018 for return-to-provision adjustments, various amended returns filed by the Company, and final true-ups of deferred tax liabilities.
(7) Prior period foreign currency impact reflected as “N/A” to isolate change for current period only.
(8) Amounts excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior-year period, which eliminates dollar-based fluctuations driven solely from currency rate changes.

Realized Investment Gains and Losses

The Company's investment strategy is to invest primarily in fixed maturity securities to provide a reliable stream of investment income, which is one of the drivers of the Company’s growth and profitability. This investment strategy incorporates asset-liability matching (ALM) to align the expected cash flows of the portfolio to the needs of the Company's liability structure. The Company does not purchase securities with the intent of generating capital gains or losses. However, investment gains and losses may be realized as a result of changes in the financial markets and the creditworthiness of specific issuers, tax planning strategies, and/or general portfolio management and rebalancing. The realization of investment gains and losses is independent of the underwriting and administration of the Company's insurance products. Realized investment gains and losses include securities transactions, impairments, changes in loan loss reserves, and derivative and foreign currency activities. Effective January 1, 2018, changes in fair value of equity securities are also included in earnings as a component of realized investment gains and losses.


48



Securities Transactions, Impairments, and Gains (Losses) on Equity Securities

Securities transactions include gains and losses from sales and redemptions of investments where the amount received is different from the amortized cost of the investment. Impairments include other-than-temporary-impairment losses on investment securities as well as changes in loan loss reserves for loan receivables. Starting in the first quarter of 2018, gains and losses from changes in fair value of equity securities are recorded in earnings.

Certain Derivative and Foreign Currency Gains (Losses)

The Company's derivative activities include foreign currency forwards and options on certain fixed maturity securities; foreign currency forwards and options that economically hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in yen and hedge the Company's long-term exposure to a weakening yen; foreign currency swaps associated with certain senior notes and subordinated debentures; foreign currency swaps and credit defaults swaps held in consolidated VIEs; interest rate swaps used to economically hedge interest rate fluctuations in certain variable-rate investments; and interest rate swaptions to hedge changes in the fair value associated with interest rate changes for certain dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities. Gains and losses are recognized as a result of valuing these derivatives, net of the effects of hedge accounting. The Company also excludes the accounting impacts of remeasurement associated with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate from adjusted earnings. Certain derivative and foreign currency gains (losses) exclude amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency exposure management strategies (see Hedge Cost section below), and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies and notes payable, all of which are included in adjusted earnings.

Hedge Costs

Effective January 1, 2017, adjusted earnings includes the impact of amortized hedge costs. Amortized hedge costs represent costs incurred in using foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the foreign exchange risk of a portion of U.S. dollar-denominated assets in the Company's Japan segment investment portfolio. Amortized hedge costs are offset by a hedge cost amortization benefit recognized for foreign currency forwards that economically hedge the Company's long-term exposure to a weakening yen. These amortized hedge costs are derived from the difference between the foreign currency spot rate at time of trade inception and the contractual foreign currency forward rate, recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the hedge. There is no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for amortized hedge costs.

Hedge costs can fluctuate based upon many factors, including the derivative notional amount, the length of time of the derivative contract, changes in both U.S. and Japan interest rates, and supply and demand for dollar funding. Hedge costs have increased in recent periods due to changes in the previously mentioned factors. In late 2017, the Company
took steps to mitigate rising hedge costs by increasing the amount of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments held
in Aflac Japan and to reduce hedge cost volatility by extending hedge duration. For additional information regarding
currency hedging, refer to Hedging Activities in the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A.

For additional information regarding realized investment gains and losses, including details of reported amounts for the periods presented, see Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other and Non-recurring Items

The United States insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. The system can result in periodic charges to the Company as a result of insolvencies/bankruptcies that occur with other companies in the life insurance industry. Some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. These charges neither relate to the ordinary course of the Company’s business nor reflect the Company’s underlying business performance, but result from external situations not controlled by the Company. Based on the underlying nature of these assessments in the United States, effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted a policy of excluding any charges associated with U.S. guaranty fund assessments and the corresponding tax benefit or expense from adjusted earnings.
For the Penn Treaty liquidation that was recognized by judicial authority in March 2017, the Company estimated and recognized a discounted liability for assessments of $62 million (undiscounted $94 million), offset by discounted premium tax credits of $48 million (undiscounted $74 million), for a net $14 million impact to net income in the quarter ended March 31, 2017. For additional information regarding guaranty fund assessments, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


49



In Japan, the government also requires the insurance industry to contribute to a policyholder protection corporation that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers; however, these costs are calculated and administered differently than in the United States. In Japan, these costs are not directly related to specific insolvencies or bankruptcies, but are rather a regular operational cost for an insurance company. Based on this structure, the Company does not remove the Japan policyholder protection expenses from adjusted earnings.
Effective January 1, 2017, nonrecurring items also include conversion costs related to legally converting the Company's Japan branch to a subsidiary; these costs primarily consist of expenditures for legal, accounting, consulting, integration of systems and processes and other similar services. These Japan branch conversion costs amounted to $75 million in 2018 and $42 million in 2017.

The Company considers the costs associated with the early redemption of its debt to be unrelated to the underlying fundamentals and trends in its insurance operations. Additionally, these costs are driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to the issuance of the debt, and the Company considers these interest rate changes to represent economic conditions not directly associated with its insurance operations. In November 2017, the Parent Company extinguished $500 million of its 5.50% subordinated debentures. The pretax non-operating expense due to the early redemption of these notes was $13 million. In 2016, the Parent Company completed a tender offer in which it extinguished $176 million principal of its 6.90% senior notes due 2039 and $193 million principal of its 6.45% senior notes due 2040. The pretax non-operating loss due to the early redemption of these notes was $137 million.

Tax Reform Adjustment

Among other changes, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the period of enactment, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recognized a non-recurring estimated $1.9 billion benefit for the reduction of the net deferred tax liability. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability.

For further information, see Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Taxes above in this MD&A, and Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Foreign Currency Translation
Aflac Japan’s premiums and a significant portion of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into dollars for financial reporting purposes. The Company translates Aflac Japan’s yen-denominated income statement into dollars using the average exchange rate for the reporting period, and the Company translates its yen-denominated balance sheet using the exchange rate at the end of the period.
Due to the size of Aflac Japan, whose functional currency is the Japanese yen, fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on the Company's reported results. In periods when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars results in fewer dollars being reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars results in more dollars being reported. Consequently, yen weakening has the effect of suppressing current period results in relation to the comparable prior period, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying current period results in relation to the comparable prior period. Management evaluates the Company's financial performance both including and excluding the impact of foreign currency translation to monitor, respectively, cumulative currency impacts on book value and the currency-neutral operating performance over time.
Income Taxes
The Company's combined U.S. and Japanese effective income tax rate on pretax earnings was 26.7% in 2018, (14.6)% in 2017 and 34.6% in 2016. The reduction in the tax rate for 2017 was primarily due to the $1.9 billion benefit as a result of the Tax Act. The decrease in the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 drove the reduction in the effective tax rate for 2018 compared with years prior to 2017. Total income taxes were $1.1 billion in 2018, compared with $(586) million in 2017 and $1.4 billion in 2016. Japanese income taxes on Aflac Japan's results account for most of the Company's consolidated income tax expense. For further information, see Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Taxes above in this MD&A, and Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


50



2019 Outlook

The Company’s strategy to drive long-term shareholder value is to pursue growth through product development, distribution expansion and digital advancements to improve the customer experience.

The Company's objectives in 2019 are to maintain strong pre-tax margins in its Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. segments through disciplined product pricing, stable investment returns and leveraging a period of favorable benefit ratios to invest in its platform for future growth and efficiency. The Company believes that its market-leading position, powerful brand recognition and diverse distribution in Japan and the United States will provide support toward these objectives.
The Company believes that its efforts will support its prudent strategies for capital deployment in the form of dividends, share repurchases, and opportunistic investments that enhance the Company’s business with a focus on digital distribution and leveraging the Company’s brand, distribution and scale. The Company has stated that the dividend payout ratio from its Aflac Japan segment is likely to be in the range of 80% - 100% of FSA earnings. In its Aflac U.S. segment, the Company plans to continue its RBC drawdown plan to an RBC in the 500% range by the end of 2019.

Aflac Japan Segment
In Japan, the Company anticipates that the shift in earned premium from first sector savings products to third sector cancer and medical products and first sector protection products, will continue to result in moderately lower benefit ratios in the Aflac Japan segment. The Company also expects this shift in business mix, plus continued investment in IT and digital advancements, to result in moderately higher expense ratios for Aflac Japan. The Company believes that the Japan segment will face revenue challenges in 2019 due to the run-off and paid-up status of first sector savings products. In addition, net investment income is expected to decline modestly as compared to 2018, due in part to the low rate environment in Japan, de-risking of the portfolio and rolling U.S. dollar hedge positions into higher cost contracts.

Aflac U.S. Segment
The Company expects the profit margins for the Aflac U.S. segment to remain strong, providing a prudent opportunity to reinvest profits back into the U.S. business. The Company believes that in 2019, benefit ratios in the U.S. will continue to trend favorably and that expense ratios will continue to be elevated in light of investments into U.S. platforms in both the individual and group channels. Net investment income is expected to decline modestly, primarily as the result of the Company’s U.S. capital and RBC draw-down plan.

Corporate Segment
The Company expects corporate segment results to benefit from net investment income driven by increased capital and liquidity held at the Parent Company, as well as the Company’s enterprise currency hedging strategy. The anticipated increase in investment income is expected to be partially offset by increased costs associated with continued investment in Aflac Corporate Ventures initiatives.

For important disclosures applicable to statements made in this 2019 Outlook, please see the Risk Factors section and the statement on “Forward-Looking Information” at the beginning of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

INSURANCE OPERATIONS
U.S. GAAP financial reporting requires that a company report financial and descriptive information about operating segments in its annual and interim period financial statements. Furthermore, the Company is required to report a measure of segment profit or loss, certain revenue and expense items, and segment assets. Aflac's insurance business consists of two segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. Aflac Japan is the principal contributor to consolidated earnings. Businesses that are not individually reportable, such as the Parent Company, and business activities, including reinsurance retrocession activities, not included in Aflac Japan or Aflac U.S. are included in the "Corporate and other" category. See the Item 1. Business section of this Form 10-K for a summary of each segment's products and distribution channels, and a discussion of the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary and the creation of asset management subsidiaries in 2018.

51



AFLAC JAPAN SEGMENT
Aflac Japan Pretax Adjusted Earnings

Changes in Aflac Japan's pretax adjusted earnings and profit margins are primarily affected by morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency and investment yields. The following table presents a summary of operating results for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.
Aflac Japan Summary of Operating Results
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Net premium income$12,762
 $12,752
 $13,537
Net investment income:     
Yen-denominated investment income1,283
 1,294
 1,346
U.S. dollar-denominated investment income1,356
 1,169
 1,208
Net investment income2,639
 2,463
 2,554
Amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency denominated investments236
 228
 186
Net investment income, less amortized hedge costs2,403
 2,235
 2,368
Other income (loss)41
 41
 40
Total adjusted revenues15,206
 15,028
 15,945
Benefits and claims, net8,913
 9,087
 9,828
Adjusted expenses:     
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs710
 630
 644
Insurance commissions735
 736
 787
Insurance and other expenses1,640
 1,521
 1,538
Total adjusted expenses3,085
 2,887
 2,969
Total benefits and expenses11,998
 11,974
 12,797
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
$3,208
 $3,054
 $3,148
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate110.39
 112.16
 108.70
  In Dollars In Yen
Percentage change over previous period:2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net premium income.1%
(5.8)% 12.4%
(1.5)% (2.7)% .8 %
Net investment income, less amortized
  hedge costs
7.5
 (5.6) .2
 5.5
 (2.0) (10.3)
Total adjusted revenues1.2
 (5.8) 10.4
 (.5) (2.5) (1.0)
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
5.0
 (3.0) 1.5
 3.1
 .6
 (9.0)
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.
In yen terms, Aflac Japan's net premium income decreased in 2018, with growth in third sector premium more than offset by an anticipated reduction in first sector premium due to savings products reaching premium paid-up status. Net investment income, net of amortized hedge costs, increased in 2018 largely due to higher income from U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate assets. Pretax adjusted earnings in yen increased, driven by higher net investment income and a favorable third sector benefit ratio.

Annualized premiums in force at December 31, 2018, were 1.53 trillion yen, compared with 1.55 trillion yen in 2017 and 1.61 trillion yen in 2016. The decrease in annualized premiums in force in yen of 1.6% in 2018 and 3.4% in 2017 was driven primarily by limited-pay policies becoming paid-up during the year. The decrease in annualized premiums in force in yen of .7% in 2016 reflects the net effect of sales of new policies combined with limited-pay policies becoming paid-up and the persistency of Aflac Japan’s business. Annualized premiums in force, translated into dollars at respective year-end exchange rates, were $13.8 billion in 2018, $13.7 billion in 2017, and $13.8 billion in 2016.


52



Aflac Japan's investment portfolios include U.S. dollar-denominated securities and reverse-dual currency securities (yen-denominated debt securities with dollar coupon payments). In years when the yen strengthens in relation to the dollar, translating Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investment income into yen lowers growth rates for net investment income, total adjusted revenues, and pretax adjusted earnings in yen terms. In years when the yen weakens, translating U.S. dollar-denominated investment income into yen magnifies growth rates for net investment income, total adjusted revenues, and pretax adjusted earnings in yen terms.

The following table illustrates the effect of translating Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investment income and related items into yen by comparing certain segment results with those that would have been reported had dollar/yen exchange rates remained unchanged from the prior year. Amounts excluding foreign currency impact on U.S. dollar denominated investment income were determined using the average dollar/yen exchange rate for the comparable prior year period.
Aflac Japan Percentage Changes Over Prior Year
(Yen Operating Results)
  Including Foreign
Currency Changes
 
Excluding Foreign
Currency Changes
(2)
  2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net investment income, less
amortized hedge costs
5.5 % (2.0)% (10.3)% 6.4 % (3.6)% (5.1)%
Total adjusted revenues(.5) (2.5) (1.0) (.3) (2.8) (.1)
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
3.1
 .6
 (9.0) 3.7
 (.5) (5.3)
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.
(2)Amounts excluding foreign currency impact on U.S. dollar-denominated investment income (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) were determined using the average dollar/yen exchange rate for the comparable prior year period.
The following table presents a summary of operating ratios in yen terms for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:2018 2017 2016 
Benefits and claims, net58.6% 60.4% 61.6% 
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs4.7
 4.2
 4.0
 
Insurance commissions4.8
 4.9
 4.9
 
Insurance and other expenses10.8
 10.1
 9.8
 
Total adjusted expenses20.3
 19.2
 18.7
 
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
21.1
 20.4
 19.7
 
Ratios to total premiums:      
Benefits and claims, net69.9% 71.3% 72.6% 
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs5.6
 4.9
 4.8
 
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.

In 2018, the benefit ratio decreased, compared to the prior year, primarily due to the continued change in mix of first and third sector business as first sector products become paid-up, as well as continued favorable third sector claims trends, and higher surrender rates for the cancer products. In 2018, the adjusted expense ratio increased due to lower premium income impacted by first sector products becoming paid-up, higher expenses primarily related to increased system development, outsourcing costs for new products, and DAC amortization due to the increase of surrender for cancer products. In total for 2018, the pretax adjusted profit margin increased, reflecting the decrease in the benefit ratio partially offset by a smaller increase in the expense ratio. For 2019, the Company anticipates the Aflac Japan pretax adjusted profit margin (calculated by dividing adjusted earnings by adjusted revenues) to remain stable.


53



Aflac Japan Sales

The following table presents Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales for the years ended December 31.
  In Dollars In Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
New annualized premium sales$869
 $846
 $1,045
 95.9
 94.9
 113.7
Increase (decrease) over prior period2.7% (19.0)% 4.8% 1.1% (16.6)% (5.9)%

The following table details the contributions to Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales by major insurance product for the years ended December 31.
 2018 2017 2016 
Cancer65.8%
55.8%
46.6%
Medical25.0
 34.1
 26.0
 
Income support1.8
 2.3
 0.0
 
Ordinary life:      
WAYS.5
 .6
 11.9
 
Child endowment.3
 .5
 6.4
 
Other ordinary life (1)
6.1
 6.0
 6.2
 
Other.5
 .7
 2.9
 
    Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
(1) Includes term and whole life

The foundation of Aflac Japan's product portfolio has been, and continues to be, third sector products, which include cancer, medical and Income Support insurance products. New annualized premium sales of third sector products on a yen basis increased 1.6% during 2018, compared with 2017. Third sector sales included growth in the new cancer insurance product that was launched in April 2018, however medical sales have declined compared with 2017 as a result of strong sales in 2017 driven by the introduction of the new medical insurance product in the second quarter of 2017. Aflac Japan has been focusing more on promotion of cancer and medical insurance products in this low-interest-rate environment. These products are less interest-rate sensitive and more profitable compared to first sector products. With continued cost pressure on Japan’s health care system, the Company expects the need for third sector products will continue to rise in the future and that the medical and cancer insurance products Aflac Japan provides will continue to be an important part of its product portfolio.

Independent corporate agencies and individual agencies contributed 40.1% of total new annualized premium sales for Aflac Japan in 2018, compared with 42.8% in 2017 and 46.7% in 2016. Affiliated corporate agencies, which include Japan Post, contributed 55.3% of total new annualized premium sales in 2018, compared with 52.0% in 2017 and 44.4% in 2016. Japan Post offers Aflac's cancer insurance products in more than 20,000 post offices. In 2018, Japan Post's sales of cancer insurance constituted approximately 25% of Aflac Japan's third sector sales. The Company believes this alliance with Japan Post has and will further benefit its cancer insurance sales. In 2018, Aflac Japan recruited 85 new sales agencies. At December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan was represented by more than 9,800 sales agencies, with more than 109,000 licensed sales associates employed by those agencies.
At December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had agreements to sell its products at 371 banks, approximately 90% of the total number of banks in Japan. Bank channel sales accounted for 4.6% of new annualized premium sales in 2018 for Aflac Japan, compared with 5.2% in 2017 and 8.9% in 2016.

Aflac Japan Investments

The level of investment income in yen is affected by available cash flow from operations, the timing of investing the cash flow, yields on new investments, the effect of yen/dollar exchange rates on U.S. dollar-denominated investment income, and other factors.

As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac Japan invests in yen and U.S. dollar-denominated investments. Yen-denominated investments primarily consist of JGBs and public and private fixed maturity securities. Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investments include fixed maturity investments and growth

54



assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships or similar investment vehicles. Aflac Japan has been investing in both publicly-traded and privately originated U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loan receivables, Aflac Japan has entered into foreign currency forwards and options to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of a portion of the U.S. dollar investments, interest rate swaptions to hedge interest rate fluctuations on some U.S. dollar investments, and interest rate swaps to economically hedge interest rate fluctuations in certain variable-rate investments.

The following table details the investment purchases for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.
(In millions) 2018 2017 
Yen-denominated:     
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Japan government and agencies $3,895
 $5,367
 
     Other fixed maturity securities 1,981
 1,579
 
  Equity securities 221
 189
 
        Total yen-denominated $6,097
 $7,135
 
      
U.S. dollar-denominated:     
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Other fixed maturity securities $1,299
 $466
 
     Infrastructure debt 0
 134
 
     Bank loans 346
 0
 
  Equity securities 120
 158
 
  Other investments:     
     Transitional real estate loans 3,168
 1,063
 
     Commercial mortgage loans 13
 48
 
     Middle market loans 839
 548
 
     Limited partnerships 314
 96
 
        Total dollar-denominated $6,099
 $2,513
 
            Total Aflac Japan purchases $12,196
 $9,648
 

Aflac Japan purchased $1.2 billion of yen-denominated private placements in 2018, compared with $1.1 billion in 2017.

See the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A for further discussion of these investment programs, and see Notes 1, 3 and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding loans and loan receivables.

Funds available for investment include cash flows from operations, investment income, and funds generated from maturities, redemptions, securities lending, and other securities transactions. Securities lending is also used from time to time to accelerate the availability of funds for investment. Purchases of securities from period to period are determined based on multiple objectives including appropriate portfolio diversification, the relative value of a potential investment and availability of investment opportunities, liquidity, credit and other risk factors while adhering to the Company's investment policy guidelines.

The following table presents the results of Aflac Japan's investment yields for the years ended and as of December 31.

55



 2018 2017 2016
Total purchases for the period (in millions) (1)
$11,882
 $9,552
 $10,903
New money yield (1),(2)
3.06% 1.98% 1.40%
Return on average invested assets (3)
2.33
 2.31
 2.47
Portfolio book yield, including U.S. dollar-denominated investments,
end of period
(1)
2.61% 2.56% 2.62%
(1)Includes fixed maturity securities, loan receivables, equity securities, and excludes alternative investments in limited partnerships
(2)Reported on a gross yield basis; excludes investment expenses, external management fees, and amortized hedge costs
(3)Net of investment expenses and amortized hedge costs, year-to-date number reflected on a quarterly average basis

The increase in the Aflac Japan new money yield in 2018 was primarily due to increased allocations to higher yielding U.S. dollar-denominated asset classes.

See Notes 3, 4 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A for additional information on the Company's investments and hedging strategies.

AFLAC U.S. SEGMENT
Aflac U.S. Pretax Adjusted Earnings
Changes in Aflac U.S. pretax adjusted earnings and profit margins are primarily affected by morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency and investment yields. The following table presents a summary of operating results for Aflac U.S. for the years ended December 31.
Aflac U.S. Summary of Operating Results
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Net premium income$5,708
 $5,563
 $5,454
Net investment income727
 721
 703
Other income8
 5
 10
Total adjusted revenues6,443
 6,289
 6,167
Benefits and claims2,887
 2,885
 2,869
Adjusted expenses:     
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs534
 502
 497
Insurance commissions585
 580
 580
Insurance and other expenses1,152
 1,077
 1,013
Total adjusted expenses2,271
 2,159
 2,090
Total benefits and expenses5,158
 5,044
 4,959
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
$1,285
 $1,245
 $1,208
Percentage change over previous period:     
Net premium income2.6% 2.0% 2.0%
Net investment income.8
 2.6
 3.8
Total adjusted revenues2.4
 2.0
 2.2
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
3.2
 3.1
 9.7
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.

Net investment income increased in 2018, driven by higher income from floating rate assets partially offset from the drawdown of excess capital in the U.S. segment. Annualized premiums in force increased 3.0% in 2018, 2.6% in 2017 and 2.4% in 2016. Annualized premiums in force at December 31 were $6.2 billion in 2018, compared with $6.1 billion in 2017 and $5.9 billion in 2016.


56



The following table presents a summary of operating ratios for Aflac U.S. for the years ended December 31.
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:2018 2017 2016 
Benefits and claims44.8% 45.9%
46.5%
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs8.3
 8.0
 8.1
 
Insurance commissions9.1
 9.2
 9.4
 
Insurance and other expenses17.9
 17.1
 16.4
 
Total adjusted expenses35.2
 34.3
 33.9
 
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
19.9
 19.8
 19.6
 
Ratios to total premiums:      
Benefits and claims50.6
 51.9
 52.6
 
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs9.4
 9.0
 9.1
 
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.

The benefit ratio decreased in 2018, compared with 2017, due in large part to benefit reserve releases related to slightly elevated lapses of older individual cancer policies in the first and fourth quarters of 2018. The adjusted expense ratio increased slightly in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily due to planned spending increases reflecting elevated investments in the platform. The pretax adjusted profit margin increased slightly in 2018 when compared with 2017, primarily due to lower benefit ratios. In 2019, the Company expects benefit ratios to be slightly lower than 2018 levels, reflecting ongoing changes in business mix, and expects somewhat higher expense ratios reflecting further investments in its U.S. platform. Net investment income is expected to decline modestly, primarily the result of the Company’s U.S. capital and RBC drawdown plan. (Note that all of these ratios-to-revenue reflect reduced net investment income due to the Company's planned drawdown of excess capital to lower RBC ratios. See the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of this MD&A for further discussion of the planned reduction of RBC.)

Aflac U.S. Sales
The following table presents Aflac's U.S. new annualized premium sales for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
New annualized premium sales$1,601
 $1,552
 $1,482
 
Increase (decrease) over prior period3.2% 4.7% (.3)% 
The following table details the contributions to Aflac's U.S. new annualized premium sales by major insurance product category for the years ended December 31.
 2018 2017 2016 
Accident29.2% 29.4% 29.5% 
Short-term disability22.7
 22.9
 23.5
 
    Critical care (1)
22.1
 22.8
 22.1
 
Hospital indemnity15.8
 14.8
 14.8
 
Dental/vision4.7
 5.1
 5.0
 
Life5.5
 5.0
 5.1
 
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 
(1) Includes cancer, critical illness and hospital intensive care products

New annualized premium sales for accident insurance, the Aflac U.S. leading product category, increased 2.4%, short-term disability sales increased 1.8%, critical care insurance sales (including cancer insurance) decreased .1%, and hospital indemnity insurance sales increased 10.4% in 2018, compared with 2017.

57



The addition of group products has expanded Aflac U.S.'s reach and enabled Aflac U.S. to generate more sales opportunities with larger employers and through brokers and sales agent channels. The Company anticipates that the appeal of Aflac U.S. group products will continue to enhance opportunities to connect with larger businesses and their employees. The Aflac U.S. portfolio of group and individual products offers businesses the opportunity to give their employees a more valuable and comprehensive selection of benefit options.
In 2018, the Aflac U.S. sales forces included an average of more than 8,500 U.S. agents, including brokers, who were actively producing business on a weekly basis. The Company believes that this average weekly producer equivalent metric allows sales management to monitor progress and needs.

One Day PaySM is a claims initiative that Aflac U.S. has focused on to process, approve and pay eligible claims in just one day. The Company believes that this claims practice enhances the Aflac U.S. brand reputation and the trust policyholders have in Aflac, and it helps Aflac stand out from competitors.

Aflac U.S. products provide cash benefits that can be used to help with increasing out-of-pocket medical expenses, help cover household costs, or protect against income and asset loss. Group products and relationships with insurance brokers that handle the larger-case market are helping Aflac U.S. expand its reach by selling to larger businesses. Aflac U.S. is regularly evaluating the marketplace to identify opportunities to bring the most relevant, cost-effective products to customers. The Company believes the need for its products remains very strong, and Aflac U.S. continues to work on enhancing its distribution capabilities to access employers of unrealized lossesall sizes, including initiatives that benefit the field force and the broker community. At the same time, the Company is seeking opportunities to leverage its brand strength and attractive product portfolio in the evolving health care environment.

U.S. Regulatory Environment

Healthcare Reform Legislation

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), federal health care legislation, was intended to give Americans of all ages and income levels access to comprehensive major medical health insurance and gave the U.S. federal government direct regulatory authority over the business of health insurance. While the ACA was enacted in 2010, the major elements of the law became effective on January 1, 2014. The ACA included major changes to the U.S. health care insurance marketplace. Among other changes, the ACA included an individual medical insurance coverage mandate (which has since been repealed effective 2019 by the Tax Act), provided for penalties on certain employers for failing to provide adequate coverage, created health insurance exchanges, and addressed coverage and exclusions as well as medical loss ratios. It also imposed an excise tax on certain high cost plans, known as the “Cadillac tax,” that is currently scheduled to begin in 2022. The ACA also included changes in government reimbursements and tax credits for individuals and employers and altered federal and state regulation of health insurers. The ACA, as enacted, does not require material changes in the design of the Company's insurance products. However, indirect consequences of the legislation and regulations could present challenges that could potentially have an impact on the Company's sales model, financial condition and results of operations. The United States Congress has considered and may continue to consider legislation that would repeal and replace key provisions of the ACA. There can be no assurance that any legislation affecting the ACA will be passed by Congress, nor as to the ultimate timing or provisions of any such legislation, nor as to the effect of any such legislation on the design or marketability of the Company's insurance products. Further, certain provisions of the ACA have been and may continue to be subject to challenge through litigation, the ultimate effects of which on the ACA are uncertain.

President Trump signed an Executive Order in October 2017 directing federal regulatory agencies to review and modify certain regulations issued under the ACA. The stated objectives of the Executive Order are to increase competition and consumer choices in health care markets, and to lower costs for health care, by making association health plans available to more employers, allowing employers to make better use of health reimbursement arrangements, and expanding coverage through short-term insurance. The Executive Order tasks three federal agencies, the Departments of Labor (DOL), Treasury, and Health and Human Services (HHS) with reviewing current rules and developing guidance to implement the order. While the details of any proposed modifications will not be known until further action by the agencies, the Company anticipates that the Executive Order will not have a significant impact on the availability or marketability of its products.


58



Tax Reform Legislation

The Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, effective January 1, 2018, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated or reduced certain deductions and credits and limited the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation.

The Tax Act also transitions international corporate taxation from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system, which in light of the current tax treatment of Aflac Japan as a branch has the effect of subjecting the earnings of Aflac Japan to Japan taxation and subjecting the Company's other earnings, including the consolidated earnings of the Parent Company, to U.S. taxation. The treatment of Aflac Japan as a branch for U.S. tax purposes did not change following the completion of its conversion from a branch structure to a subsidiary structure for legal purposes on April 1, 2018.

Aflac U.S. prices its business on an internal rate of return basis. The Aflac U.S. business has a financial structure that the Company expects to be neutral on a pricing basis from these tax changes. The Aflac U.S. products have high initial costs for marketing, underwriting and administration, which will have less tax relief under the changes and will increase the amount required to invest in new business. In addition, the Company expects that RBC requirements will increase on an after-tax basis, being another source of initial funding required for these products. The tax basis for reserves and DAC may also change the timing of tax payments in an accelerated or unfavorable direction. All of these effects will offset a favorable lower tax rate on income in later years. The overall impact is expected to be neutral on a pricing basis from these various effects.

The Tax Act changes became effective on January 1, 2018. However, because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the period of enactment, during the period ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recorded a net deferred tax liability reduction of $1.9 billion as of that date. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability.For information on the effects of the Tax Act during the period ended December 31, 2018, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this report. For information on the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary, see General Business under Item 1, Business, in this report.

Dodd-Frank Act

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations issued thereunder, in particular rules to require central clearing for certain types of derivatives, may have an impact on Aflac's derivative activity, including activity on behalf of Aflac Japan. In addition, in 2015 and 2016, six U.S. financial regulators, including the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), issued final rules regarding the exchange of initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) for uncleared swaps that impose greater obligations on swap dealers regarding uncleared swaps with certain counterparties, such as Aflac. The requirements of such rules with respect to VM, as well as similar regulations in Europe, became effective on March 1, 2017. Full compliance with respect to all counterparties was required by September 1, 2017. The requirements of such rules with respect to IM are currently being phased in and will be fully implemented by September 1, 2020. In October of 2017, the CFTC and the European Commission each finalized comparability determinations that permit certain swap dealers who are subject to both regulatory margin regimes to take advantage of substituted compliance by complying with one set of margin requirements. The margin requirements are expected to result in more stringent collateral requirements and to affect other aspects of Aflac's derivatives activity.

The Dodd-Frank Act also established a Federal Insurance Office (FIO) under the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and of lines of business other than certain health insurance, certain long-term care insurance and crop insurance. Traditionally, U.S. insurance companies have been regulated primarily by state insurance departments. The FIO does not directly regulate the insurance industry, but under Dodd-Frank it has the power to preempt state insurance regulations that are inconsistent with international agreements reached by the federal government, subject to certain requirements and restrictions. The FIO and certain federal agencies must achieve consensus positions with the state insurance regulators when taking positions on insurance proposals by certain international forums. In December 2013, the FIO released a report entitled "How To Modernize And Improve The System Of Insurance Regulation In The United States." The report was required by the Dodd-Frank Act, and included 18 recommended areas of near-term reform for the states, including addressing capital adequacy and safety/soundness issues, reform of insurer resolution practices, and reform of marketplace regulation. The report also listed nine recommended areas for direct federal involvement in insurance regulation. Some of the recommendations outlined in the FIO report released in December 2013 have been implemented. The National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers Reform Act, signed into law in January 2015, simplifies the agent and broker licensing process across state lines. The FIO has also engaged with the supervisory colleges to monitor financial stability and identify regulatory gaps for large national and internationally active

59



insurers. The President and Congress have stated proposals to reform or repeal certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, some of which have been implemented. The Company cannot predict with any degree of certainty what impact, if any, such proposals will have on Aflac's business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Insurance Guaranty Laws

Under state insurance guaranty association laws and similar laws in international jurisdictions, Aflac is subject to assessments, based on the share of business it writes in the relevant jurisdiction, for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants. In the United States, some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. The Company's policy is to accrue assessments when the entity for which the insolvency relates has met its state of domicile's statutory definition of insolvency, the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable and the related premium upon which the assessment is based is written. In most states, the definition is met with a declaration of financial insolvency by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Aflac U.S. Investments

The level of investment income is affected by available cash flow from operations, the timing of investing the cash flow, yields on new investments, and other factors.

As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac U.S. invests in fixed maturity investments and growth assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships. Aflac U.S. has been investing in both publicly traded and privately originated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loan receivables.

The following table details the investment purchases for Aflac U.S. as of December 31.
(In millions) 2018 2017 
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Other fixed maturity securities $1,068
 $836
 
     Infrastructure debt 97
 60
 
  Equity securities 76
 56
 
  Other investments:     
     Transitional real estate loans 610
 249
 
     Commercial mortgage loans 163
 34
 
     Middle market loans 141
 199
 
     Limited partnerships 44
 16
 
        Total Aflac U.S. Purchases $2,199
 $1,450
 

Funds available for investment include cash flows from operations, investment income, and funds generated from maturities, redemptions, and other securities transactions. Purchases of securities from period to period are determined based on multiple objectives, including appropriate portfolio diversification, the relative value of a potential investment and availability of investment opportunities, liquidity, credit and other risk factors while adhering to the Company's investment policy guidelines.

The following table presents the results of Aflac's U.S. investment yields for the years ended and as of December 31.
 2018 2017 2016 
Total purchases for period (in millions) (1)
$2,155
 $1,434
 $1,144
 
New money yield (1), (2)
4.55% 4.49% 3.89% 
Return on average invested assets (3)
5.16
 5.07
 5.04
 
Portfolio book yield, end of period (1)
5.55% 5.52% 5.60% 
(1) Includes fixed maturity securities, loan receivables, equity securities, and excludes alternative investments in limited partnerships
(2) Reported on a gross yield basis; excludes investment expenses and external management fees
(3)Net of investment expenses, year-to-date number reflected on a quarterly average basis


60



The increase in the Aflac U.S. new money yield in 2018 was primarily due to increased allocations to higher yielding floating rate assets.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Credit Risk subsection of MD&A for more information regarding the sector concentrations of the Company's investments.

CORPORATE AND OTHER

Total revenue for corporate and other increased to $339 million in 2018, compared with $272 million in 2017 and $277 million in 2016. This increase in 2018 was primarily driven by an increase in net investment income. The increase in net investment income to $113 million in 2018, compared with $35 million in 2017, was driven by a $36 million pretax contribution from the Company’s corporate yen hedging program and increased income from over $600 million of invested assets transferred as part of the drawdown of excess capital in the U.S. segment beginning in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Corporate adjusted expenses consist primarily of personnel compensation, benefits, reinsurance retrocession benefits expense, and facilities expenses. Corporate expenses were $478 million in 2018, compared with $486 million in 2017, and $516 million in 2016. The decline in adjusted expenses in 2018 was considered insignificant. The decline in adjusted expenses from 2016 to 2017 was driven in large part by fluctuations in retrocession activity, which results in corresponding declines in total premiums.

Pretax adjusted earnings for corporate and other were a loss of $139 million in 2018, compared with a loss of $214 million in 2017 and a loss of $239 million in 2016. The improvement in pretax adjusted earnings in 2018 was driven primarily by the increase in net investment income as previously described.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Company's financial condition has remained strong in the functional currencies of its operations. The yen/dollar exchange rate at the end of each period is used to translate yen-denominated balance sheet items to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes.
Investments

The Company’s investment strategy utilizes disciplined asset and liability management while seeking long-term risk-adjusted investment returns and the delivery of stable income within regulatory and capital objectives, and preserving shareholder value. In attempting to optimally balance these objectives, the Company seeks to maintain on behalf of Aflac Japan a diversified portfolio of yen-denominated investment assets, U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio hedged back to yen and a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated assets. As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac U.S. invests in fixed maturity investments and growth assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships. Aflac U.S. invests in both publicly traded and privately originated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loans.


61



The following table details investments by segment as of December 31.
Investment Securities by Segment
  Aflac Japan Aflac U.S. 
(In millions)2018 2017 2018 2017 
Available for sale, fixed maturity securities,
at fair value
(1)
$69,409
 $69,338
 $12,132
 $13,606

Held to maturity, fixed maturity securities,
at amortized cost
30,318
 31,430
 0
 0
 
Equity securities (1)
806
 868
 137
 92
 
Other investments:        
Transitional real estate loans3,621
 986
 756
 249
 
Commercial mortgage loans763
 767
 301
 141
 
Middle market loans1,144
 527
 334
 332
 
Policy loans219
 198
 13
 12
 
Short-term investments0
 57
 141
 0
 
Other333
 98
 63
 31
 
Total other investments6,080
 2,633
 1,608
 765
 
     Total investments106,613
 104,269
 13,877
 14,463
 
Cash and cash equivalents1,779
 636
 641
 1,011
 
              Total investments and cash (2)
$108,392
 $104,905
 $14,518
 $15,474
 
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2)Excludes investments and equity securitiescash held by magnitudethe Parent Company and other business segments of $3,333 in 2018 and $3,280 in 2017.

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $4.3 billion, or 3.4% of total investments and cash, as of December 31, 2015.2018, compared with $3.5 billion, or 2.8%, at December 31, 2017. For a discussion of the factors affecting the Company's cash balance, see the Operating Activities, Investing Activities and Financing Activities subsections of this MD&A.


In 2017, Aflac U.S. became a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB). As a member, Aflac U.S. can access low-cost funding and also receive dividends on FHLB membership stock. Additional FHLB stock purchases are required based on funding activity with the FHLB. Aflac U.S. will be required to post acceptable forms of collateral for any funding from the FHLB. The FHLB stock purchased by the Company is classified as a restricted investment and is included in "other investments" in the consolidated balance sheets.

For additional information concerning the Company's investments, see Notes 3, 4, and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The ratings of the Company's securities referenced in the table below are based on the ratings designations provided by major Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs) (Moody's, S&P and Fitch) or, if not rated, are determined based on the Company's internal analysis of such securities. When the ratings issued by the rating agencies differ, the Company utilizes the second lowest rating when three or more rating agency ratings are available or the lowest rating when only two rating agency ratings are available.


7062



Percentage Decline From Amortized Cost
The distributions of debt securities the Company owns, by credit rating, as of December 31 were as follows:
Composition of Securities Portfolio by Credit Rating
(In millions)Total
Amortized
Cost
 Total
Unrealized
Loss
 Less than 20% 20% to 50% Greater than 50%
Amortized
Cost
 Unrealized
Loss
 Amortized
Cost
 Unrealized
Loss
 Amortized
Cost
 Unrealized
Loss
Available-for-sale fixed
maturities and
perpetual securities:
               
Investment-grade
securities
$17,746
 $1,502
 $16,466
 $1,129
 $1,280
 $373
 $0
 $0
Below-
investment-grade
securities
2,190
 290
 1,737
 125
 377
 124
 76
 41
Held-to-maturity
fixed maturities:
               
Investment-grade
securities
4,295
 217
 4,295
 217
 0
 0
 0
 0
Equity securities195
 4
 195
 4
 0
 0
 0
 0
Total$24,426
 $2,013
 $22,693
 $1,475
 $1,657
 $497
 $76
 $41
   2018   2017 
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
AAA 1.0%   .9%   1.0%   .9% 
AA 3.9
   4.0
   3.9
   4.0
 
A 67.9
   69.9
   65.8
   66.9
 
BBB 23.2
   21.6
   24.0
   23.3
 
BB or lower 4.0
   3.6
   5.3
   4.9
 
Total 100.0%   100.0%   100.0%   100.0% 


As of December 31, 2018, the Company's direct and indirect exposure to securities in its investment portfolio that were guaranteed by third parties was immaterial both individually and in the aggregate.

The following table presents the 10 largest unrealized loss positions in ourthe Company's portfolio as of December 31, 2015.2018.
(In millions)Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized    
Loss    
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. BBB   $144
   $88
   $(56) 
Barrick Gold Corp. BBB   173
   132
   (41) 
Noble Holding International Ltd. BBB   104
   66
   (38) 
Teck Resources Ltd. BB   69
   32
   (37) 
Bank of America Corp. BBB   375
   340
   (35) 
Transocean Inc. BB   71
   38
   (33) 
Investcorp Capital Limited BB   357
   324
   (33) 
Devon Energy Corp. BBB   137
   104
   (33) 
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP BBB   185
   155
   (30) 
CFE BBB   265
   235
   (30) 
(In millions)Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized    
Loss    
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. B   $143
   $75
   $(68) 
AXA BBB   293
   242
   (51) 
Autostrade Per Litalia Spa BBB   180
   150
   (30) 
Baker Hughes Inc. A   122
   94
   (28) 
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse (KLP) BBB   135
   113
   (22) 
Abbvie Inc. BBB   177
   156
   (21) 
Transocean Inc. CCC   72
   52
   (20) 
Commonwealth Bank of Australia BBB   185
   166
   (19) 
Time Warner Cable Inc. AA   118
   99
   (19) 
United Technologies Corporation BBB   209
   192
   (17) 


Generally, declines in fair values can be a result of changes in interest rates, yen/dollar exchange rate, and changes in net spreads driven by a broad market move or a change in the issuer's underlying credit quality. InAs the fourth quarter of 2015, market volatility increased markedly, especially in the energy and commodity-related sectors. Most of the declines noted above are related to issuers in those sectors. As we believeCompany believes these issuersissues have the ability to continue making timely payments of principal and interest, we viewthe Company views these changes in fair value to be temporary and dodoes not believe it is necessary to impair the carrying value of these securities. See the Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses section in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions of unrealized losses related to financial institutions including perpetual securities, and other corporate investments.

Below-Investment-Grade
The Company's portfolio of below-investment-grade securities includes debt securities purchased while the issuer was rated investment grade plus other loans and bonds purchased as part of an allocation to that segment of the market. The following is the Company's below-investment-grade exposure.


63



Below-Investment-Grade Investments
  December 31, 2018 
(In millions)
Par
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Gain
(Loss)
 
Investcorp Capital Limited$383
 $383
 $372
 $(11) 
Republic of South Africa360
 360
 372
 12
 
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines270
 199
 224
 25
 
Navient Corp.210
 114
 119
 5
 
Republic of Tunisia189
 111
 127
 16
 
Telecom Italia SpA180
 180
 208
 28
 
Barclays Bank PLC180
 111
 147
 36
 
Transnet135
 135
 135
 0
 
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc.124
 143
 75
 (68) 
IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG117
 50
 94
 44
 
Arconic Inc.100
 84
 92
 8
 
Noble Holdings International Ltd.92
 57
 57
 0
 
EMC Corp.80
 80
 68
 (12) 
Generalitat de Catalunya72
 26
 64
 38
 
Teck Resources Ltd.70
 76
 67
 (9) 
Teva Pharmaceuticals68
 66
 58
 (8) 
Transocean Inc.68
 72
 52
 (20) 
Petrobras International Finance Company65
 65
 63
 (2) 
National Gas Co. Trinidad and Tobago52
 50
 50
 0
 
CF Industries Inc.50
 49
 47
 (2) 
Other Issuers (below $50 million in par value)232
 222
 214
 (8) 
          Subtotal (1)
3,097
 2,633
 2,705
 72
 
Senior secured bank loans1,093
 1,108
 1,061
 (47) 
High yield corporate bonds519
 513
 487
 (26) 
Middle market loans, net of reserves (2)
1,497
 1,478
 1,475
 (3) 
          Grand Total$6,206
 $5,732
 $5,728
 $(4) 
(1) Securities initially purchased as investment grade, but have subsequently been downgraded to below investment grade
(2) Middle market loans are carried at amortized cost

The Company invests in senior secured bank loans and middle market loans primarily to U.S. corporate borrowers, most of which have below-investment-grade ratings. The objectives of these programs include enhancing the yield on invested assets, achieving further diversification of credit risk, and mitigating the risk of rising interest rates and hedge costs through the acquisition of floating rate assets.

The Company maintains an allocation to higher yielding corporate bonds within the Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. portfolios. Most of these securities were rated below-investment-grade at the time of purchase, but the Company also purchased several that were rated investment grade which, because of market pricing, offer yields commensurate with below-investment-grade risk profiles. The objective of this allocation was to enhance the Company's yield on invested assets and further diversify credit risk. All investments must have a minimum rating of low BB using the Company's above described rating methodology and are managed by the Company's internal credit portfolio management team.

In January 2019, PG&E Corporation (PG&E) and its operating subsidiary, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E Utility) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Northern District of California. At December 31, 2018, debt of the PG&E utility was rated investment grade and the Company's net exposure was $126 million (amortized cost), all of which was issued by PG&E utility. Subsequently, the rating on this exposure migrated to below investment grade.


64



Oil and Gas Exposure

The following tables show the breakout of our exposure to the oil and gas industry as of December 31.

 2018 
 Cost or Gross Gross    
 Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
(In millions)Cost Gains Losses Value
Securities available for sale,
  carried at fair value:
               
   Fixed maturities:               
         Independent exploration and production $813
   $72
   $36
   $849
 
         Integrated energy 426
   19
   30
   415
 
         Midstream 1,059
   91
   38
   1,112
 
         Oil field services 725
   9
   154
   580
 
         Refiners 346
   4
   20
   330
 
         Government owned - energy related 855
   167
   6
   1,016
 
         Natural gas utilities 472
   49
   6
   515
 
            Total securities available for sale 4,696
   411
   290
   4,817
 
Securities held to maturity,
  carried at amortized cost:
               
   Fixed maturities:               
         Integrated energy 234
   5
   0
   239
 
         Government owned - energy related 270
   0
   8
   262
 
         Natural gas utilities 360
   34
   0
   394
 
            Total securities held to maturity 864
   39
   8
   895
 
Equity Securities:               
         Independent exploration and production 2
   0
   0
   2
 
         Integrated energy 8
   0
   0
   8
 
         Oil field services 1
   0
   0
   1
 
         Refiners 4
   0
   0
   4
 
            Total equity securities 15
   0
   0
   15
 
                Total securities $5,575
   $450
   $298
   $5,727
 

Securities by Type of Issuance
The Company has investments in both publicly and privately issued securities. The Company's ability to sell either type of security is a function of overall market liquidity which is impacted by, among other things, the amount of outstanding securities of a particular issuer or issuance, trading history of the issue or issuer, overall market conditions, and idiosyncratic events affecting the specific issue or issuer.

The following table details investment securities by type of issuance as of December 31.

65




Investment ValuationSecurities by Type of Issuance
   2018   2017 
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair   
Value   
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair  
Value  
Publicly issued securities:               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 $83,482
   $93,255
   $81,454
   $93,025
 
Equity securities (1)
 936
   936
   831
   1,006
 
      Total publicly issued 84,418
   94,191
   82,285
   94,031
 
Privately issued securities: (2)
               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 23,692
   26,362
   25,108
   29,360
 
Equity securities (1)
 51
   51
   15
   17
 
      Total privately issued 23,743
   26,413
   25,123
   29,377
 
      Total investment securities $108,161
   $120,604
   $107,408
   $123,408
 
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2) Includes Rule 144A securities

The Company held $1,202 million and Cash
We estimate$1,789 million of perpetual securities at fair value ($1,201 million and $1,462 million at amortized cost) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The perpetual securities the fair values of our securities on a monthly basis. We monitorCompany holds were largely issued by banks that are systemically important to the estimated fair values obtained from our custodian, pricing vendors and brokers for consistency from month to month, while considering current market conditions. We also periodically discuss with our custodian and pricing brokers and vendors the pricing techniques they use to monitor the consistency of their approach and periodically assess the appropriatenessfinancial markets of the valuation level assigned to the values obtained from them. If a fair value appears unreasonable, we will re-examine the inputs and assess the reasonablenesssovereign country of domicile of the pricing data withissuer. Generally, the vendor. Additionally, we may compareCompany believes regulatory changes made in the inputs to relevant market indicesbanking industry following the Global Financial Crisis and other performance measurements. The outputthe European Sovereign Crisis, including increased capital and liquidity requirements and a reduction of this analysis is presented to the Company's Valuation and Classifications Subcommittee, or VCS. Based on the analysis provided to the VCS, the valuation is confirmed orbusiness risk, have improved overall bank creditworthiness. However, bank capital securities may be revised if there is evidencesubject to varying bail-in/resolution regimes in their home countries, which may include conversion or write-down provisions when bank regulators determine that the institution has reached the point of non-viability. Such actions could result in lower cash flows and ratings downgrades of the affected securities, which in turn could result in a more appropriate estimatereduction of fair value of the securities and increase the Company’s regulatory capital requirements. These factors are an integral part of the Company's credit review process.

The following table details the Company's privately issued investment securities as of December 31.
Privately Issued Securities
(Amortized cost, in millions)2018 2017 
Privately issued securities as a percentage of total investment securities22.0% 23.4% 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan$20,966
 $22,354
 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan as a percentage of total
investment securities
19.4% 20.8% 
Reverse-Dual Currency Securities(1)
(Amortized cost, in millions)2018 2017 
Privately issued reverse-dual currency securities$5,120
 $5,669
 
Publicly issued collateral structured as reverse-dual currency securities1,657
 1,390
 
Total reverse-dual currency securities$6,777
 $7,059
 
Reverse-dual currency securities as a percentage of total investment
securities
6.3% 6.6% 
(1)Principal payments in yen and interest payments in dollars

Aflac Japan has a portfolio of privately issued securities to better match liability characteristics and secure higher yields than those available on Japanese government or other public corporate bonds.Aflac Japan’s investments in yen-denominated privately issued securities consist primarily of non-Japanese issuers, are rated investment grade at purchase and have longer maturities, thereby allowing the Company to improve asset/liability matching and overall investment returns. These securities are generally either privately negotiated arrangements or issued under medium-term note programs and have standard documentation commensurate with credit ratings of the issuer, except when internal credit analysis indicates that additional protective and/or event-risk covenants were required. Many of these investments

66



have protective covenants appropriate to the specific investment. These may include a prohibition of certain activities by the borrower, maintenance of certain financial measures, and specific conditions impacting the payment of the Company's notes.

Hedging Activities

The Company uses derivative contracts to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. Derivative hedges are designed to reduce risk on an economic basis while minimizing the impact on financial results. The Company’s derivative hedge programs vary depending on the type of risk being hedged.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Hedge Program
The Company has deployed the following hedging strategies to mitigate exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk:
1.
Aflac Japan hedges U.S. dollar-denominated investments back to yen (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
2.
Aflac Japan maintains certain unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, which serve as an economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
3.
The Parent Company designates yen-denominated liabilities (notes payable and loans) as non-derivative hedging instruments and designates certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedges of the Company’s net investment in Aflac Japan (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).
4.
The Parent Company enters into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency exchange rate risk related to dividend payments by its subsidiary, Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).

Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program
Aflac Japan buys U.S. dollar-denominated investments, typically corporate bonds, and hedges them back to yen with foreign currency forwards and options to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk. This economically creates yen assets that match yen liabilities during the life of the derivative and provides liquidity and capital relief. The currency risk being hedged is generally based on available market data. We have performed verificationfair value of hedged investments. The following table summarizes the U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan as of December 31.
 2018 2017
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale securities:     
  Fixed maturity securities (excluding bank loans) (1)
$17,101
$17,003
 $17,972
$19,314
  Fixed maturity securities - bank loans (floating rate)1,296
1,238
 1,936
1,865
  Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
Equity securities (1), (2)
177
177
 147
173
Other investments:     
  Transitional real estate loans (floating rate)3,621
3,625
 986
984
  Commercial mortgage loans763
736
 767
753
  Middle market loans (floating rate)1,144
1,146
 527
530
  Alternative investments333
333
 97
97
      Total U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan$26,114
$26,527
 $24,082
$26,265
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2) See Note 1 of the inputsNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. for the adoption of accounting guidance related to financial instruments effective January 1, 2018.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and calculations$9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the U.S. dollar-denominated investments. The fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

67




Foreign exchange derivatives used for hedging are periodically settled, which results in cash receipt or payment at maturity or early termination. The Company had net cash settlements of $272 million, $(747) million and $1.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, associated with the currency derivatives used for hedging Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments.

The following table presents metrics related to Aflac Japan hedge costs as of December 31.

Aflac Japan Hedge Cost Metrics(1)
 2018 2017 2016
FX forward notional at end of period (in billions of dollars)(2)
9.9 9.3 11.8
Weighted average original tenor (in months)(3)
30.4 33.1 20.6
Weighted average remaining tenor (in months)(4)
21.4 27.7 18.5
Annualized amortized hedge costs (in basis points)(5)
241 211 149
Amortized hedge costs for period (in millions of dollars)(236) (228) (186)
(1) See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of amortized hedge costs.
(2) Notional is reported net of any valuation modelsoffsetting positions
(3) Tenor based on derivative's original execution date to confirmsettlement date
(4) Tenor based on period reporting date to settlement date
(5) Based on annualized amortized hedge costs divided by average FX forward notional for the period

Parent Company's Foreign Currency Hedge Program

The Company has designated certain yen-denominated liabilities and foreign currency forwards and options of the Parent Company as accounting hedges of its net investment in Aflac Japan. The Company's consolidated yen-denominated net asset position was partially hedged at $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2018, with hedging instruments comprised completely of yen-denominated debt, compared with a hedge of $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2017, with hedging instruments comprised of $1.4 billion of yen-denominated debt and $.4 billion of foreign currency forwards and options.

The Company makes its accounting designation of net investment hedge at the beginning of each quarter. If the total of the designated Parent Company non-derivative and derivative notional is equal to or less than the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective, and the currency exchange effect on the yen-denominated liabilities and the change in estimated fair value of the derivatives are reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. The Company's net investment hedge was effective during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In order to economically mitigate risks associated with the enterprise-wide exposure to the yen and the level and volatility of hedge costs, the Parent Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts. By buying U.S. dollars and selling yen, the Parent Company is effectively lowering its overall economic exposure to the yen, while Aflac Japan's U.S dollar exposure remains reduced as a result of Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated hedge program that synthetically creates yen assets. Among other objectives, this strategy is intended to reduce the valuations represent reasonable estimatesenterprise-wide hedge costs. In 2018, the portion of fair value.the enterprise-wide hedge costs reduction contributed by this strategy was $36 million. This activity is reported in the Corporate and other segment. As this program evolves, the Company will continue to evaluate the program’s efficacy, including third-party review.

Interest Rate Risk Hedge Program

To mitigate the risk of investment income volatility, the Company economically hedges interest rate fluctuations for certain variable-rate investments. To manage interest rate risk associated with its U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan, the Company also utilizes interest rate swaptions.

For additional discussion of the risks associated with the foreign currency exposure refer to the Currency Risk section in Item 1A, specifically to the Risk Factors titled “The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate“ and “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity." For discussion of the Company’s view on the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan, refer to the Investments subsection within Item 1, Business.


68



See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's hedging activities.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The following table presents deferred policy acquisition costs by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 % Change     
Aflac Japan$6,384
 $6,150
 3.8%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.3,491
 3,355
 4.1
 
Total$9,875
 $9,505
 3.9% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s deferred policy acquisition costs increased 2.0% in yen during the year ended December 31, 2018.

See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's deferred policy acquisition costs.

Policy Liabilities
The following table presents policy liabilities by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 % Change       
Aflac Japan$92,791
 $89,132
 4.1%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.10,981
 10,625
 3.4
 
Other183
 138
 32.6
 
Intercompany eliminations (2)
(767) (748) 2.5
 
Total$103,188
 $99,147
 4.1% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s policy liabilities increased 2.3% in yen during the year ended December 31, 2018.
(2) Elimination entry necessary due to recapture of a portion of policy liabilities ceded externally, as a result of the reinsurance retrocession transaction as described in Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's policy liabilities.

Notes Payable
Notes payable totaled $5.8 billion at December 31, 2018, compared with $5.3 billion at December 31, 2017.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semiannually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's notes payable.


69



Benefit Plans
Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. have various benefit plans. For additional information on the Company's Japanese and U.S. plans, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Policyholder Protection
Policyholder Protection Corporation

The Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. Legislation enacted regarding the framework of the Life Insurance Policyholder Protection Corporation (LIPPC) included government fiscal measures supporting the LIPPC. On March 30, 2012, the Diet approved legislation to enhance the stability of the LIPPC by extending the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2017. On November 25, 2016, Japan's Diet passed legislation that again extends the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2022. Effective April 2014, the annual LIPPC contribution amount for the total life industry was lowered from 40 billion yen to 33 billion yen.

Guaranty Fund Assessments

Under U.S. state guaranty association laws, certain insurance companies can be assessed (up to prescribed limits) for certain obligations to the policyholders and claimants of impaired or insolvent insurance companies that write the same line or similar lines of business. The amount of the guaranty fund assessment that an insurer is assessed is based on its proportionate share of premiums in that state.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has estimated and recognized the impact of its share of guaranty fund assessments resulting from the liquidation of a long-term care insurer. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the assessment.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had no material letters of credit, standby letters of credit, guarantees or standby repurchase obligations. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on material unconditional purchase obligations that are not recorded on the Company's balance sheet.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. provide the primary sources of liquidity to the Parent Company through dividends and management fees. The following table presents the amounts provided for the years ended December 31.
Liquidity Provided by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. to Parent Company
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Dividends declared or paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.$1,817

$2,590
(1) 
$2,000
 
Management fees paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.204
 291
 260
 
(1) Includes securities of $622 at fair value which had a value of $656 at amortized cost

The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to prior years due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018.

The primary uses of cash by the Parent Company are shareholder dividends, the repurchase of its common stock and interest on its outstanding indebtedness and operating expenses.

At the end of September 2018, the Company announced a change in its internal dividend policy which allows the
Company to increase the proportion of regulatory earnings transferred from Aflac U.S. and Aflac Japan to the Parent
Company. The Company intends to maintain higher than historical levels of capital and liquidity at the Parent Company with the goals of addressing the Company’s hedge costs and related potential need for collateral and mitigating against long-term weakening of the Japanese yen. Further, the Company plans to continue to maintain a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar based investments at Aflac Japan and consider whether the amount of such investments should be increased

70



or decreased relative to the Company’s view of economic equity surplus in Aflac Japan in light of potentially rising hedge costs and other factors. See Item 2., Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under “Forward-Looking Information,” for a description of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the Company in regards to its capital management intentions.

The Parent Company accesses debt security markets to provide additional sources of capital. In September 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC that allows the Company to issue an indefinite amount of debt securities, in one or more series, from time to time until September 2021. In August 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration with Japanese regulatory authorities that allows the Parent Company to conduct public offerings of bonds in Japan, including yen-denominated Samurai notes, up to 200 billion yen or its equivalent through August 2020. The shelf registration statement is for possible public offerings in Japan, but the bonds issued under the shelf may be transferred by the bondholders to U.S. persons in compliance with U.S. law. The Company believes outside sources for additional debt and equity capital, if needed, will continue to be available. For additional information, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The principal sources of cash for the Company's insurance operations are premiums and investment income. The primary uses of cash by the Company's insurance operations are investments, policy claims, commissions, operating expenses, income taxes and payments to the Parent Company for management fees and dividends. Both the sources and uses of cash are reasonably predictable.

When making an investment decision, the Company's first consideration is based on product needs. The Company's investment objectives provide for liquidity through the purchase of investment-grade debt securities. These objectives also take into account duration matching, and because of the long-term nature of the Company's business, the Company has adequate time to react to changing cash flow needs.

As a result of policyholder aging, claims payments are expected to gradually increase over the life of a policy. Therefore, future policy benefit reserves are accumulated in the early years of a policy and are designed to help fund future claims payments. The Company expects its future cash flows from premiums and its investment portfolio to be sufficient to meet its cash needs for benefits and expenses.

As of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company and Aflac had four lines of credit with third parties as well as two intercompany lines of credit. For additional information on the Company's lines of credit, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As part of the FHLB financing arrangement as discussed previously in the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A, Aflac U.S. borrowed and repaid $86 million during 2018.

The Company's financial statements convey its financing arrangements during the periods presented. The Company has not engaged in material intra-period short-term financings during the periods presented that are not otherwise reported in its balance sheet or disclosed therein. The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2018. The Company has not entered into transactions involving the transfer of financial assets with an obligation to repurchase financial assets that have been accounted for as loan receivables, we record those investments at amortized costa sale under applicable accounting standards, including securities lending transactions. See Notes 1, 3, and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the acquisition dateCompany's securities lending and carry at adjusted amortized cost.derivative activities. With the exception of disclosed activities in those referenced footnotes and the Risk Factors entitled, "The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate" and "Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity," the Company does not have a known trend, demand, commitment, event or uncertainty that would reasonably result in its liquidity increasing or decreasing by a material amount. As of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company had $1.0 billion as a capital reserve and an additional $1.0 billion of contingent liquidity in order to mitigate liquidity risk of derivative positions that are reducing enterprise-wide foreign currency exposure. The adjusted amortized costCompany's cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted cash on hand, money market instruments, and other debt instruments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased, all of which has minimal market, settlement or other risk exposure.

The following table presents the estimated payments by period of the loan receivables reflectsCompany's major contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018. The Company translated its yen-denominated obligations using the December 31, 2018, exchange rate. Actual future payments as reported in dollars will fluctuate with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate.


71



allowances
Distribution of Payments by Period
(In millions)
Total
Liability
(1)
 Total
Payments
 Less
Than
One Year
 
One to
Three Years
 Four to
Five Years
 After
Five Years
Future policy benefits liability (Note 7)(2)
$86,368
  $251,577
 $8,980
 $17,817
 $17,807
 $206,973
Unpaid policy claims liability (Note 7)(3)
4,584
  4,584
 2,950
 951
 387
 296
Other policyholders' funds (Note 7)(3)
7,146
 9,920
 321
 360
 581
 8,658
Long-term debt – principal (Note 9)
5,765
  5,813
 0
 45
 1,275
 4,493
Long-term debt – interest (Note 9)
37
  2,086
 175
 327
 284
 1,300
Cash collateral on loaned securities (Note 3)
1,052
 1,052
 1,052
 0
 0
 0
Operating service agreements (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
553
 165
 289
 99
 0
Operating lease obligations (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
202
 63
 82
 39
 18
Capitalized lease obligations (Note 9)
13
  13
 5
 5
 2
 1
Total contractual obligations$104,965
  $275,800
 $13,711
 $19,876
 $20,474
 $221,739
Liabilities for expected incurred lossesunrecognized tax benefits in the amount of $15 have been excluded from the tabular disclosure above because the timing of cash payment is not reasonably estimable.
(1)Liability amounts are those reported on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018.
(2)The estimated payments due by period reflect future estimated cash payments to be made to policyholders and others for future policy benefits. These projected cash outflows are based on past eventsassumptions for future policy persistency, mortality, morbidity, and other assumptions comparable with the Company's experience, consider future premium receipts on current economic conditionspolicies in force, and assume market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs. These cash outflows are undiscounted with respect to interest and, as a result, the sum of eachthe cash outflows shown for all years in the table of $251,577 exceeds the corresponding liability amount of $86,368. The Company has made significant assumptions to determine the future estimated cash outflows related to the underlying policies and contracts. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, actual cash outflow amounts and timing will differ, possibly materially, from these estimates.
(3)Includes assumptions as to the timing of policyholders reporting date. Seeclaims for prior periods and the Loansamount of those claims. Actual amounts and Loan Receivables sectiontiming of unpaid policy claims payments may differ significantly from the estimates above.
(4)Not applicable

For more information on the Company's major contractual obligations, see the applicable Note in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as indicated in the line items in the table above.

Consolidated Cash Flows

The Company translates cash flows for Aflac Japan's yen-denominated items into U.S. dollars using weighted-average exchange rates. In years when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars causes more dollars to be reported.

The following table summarizes consolidated cash flows by activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Operating activities$6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 
Investing activities(3,582) (5,431) (3,855) 
Financing activities(1,616) (2,065) (1,619) 
Exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents30
 0
 (4) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents$846
 $(1,368) $509
 

Operating Activities

Consolidated cash flow from operations decreased 1.9% in 2018, compared with 2017. The following table summarizes operating cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$4,916
 $4,959
 $4,605
 
Aflac U.S. and other operations1,098
 1,169
 1,382
 
Total$6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 


72



Investing Activities

Operating cash flow is primarily used to purchase investments to meet future policy obligations. The following table summarizes investing cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$(2,938) $(4,504) $(3,075) 
Aflac U.S. and other operations(644) (927) (780) 
Total$(3,582) $(5,431) $(3,855) 

Prudent portfolio management dictates that the Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. Currently, when the Company's fixed maturity securities mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. However, the long-term nature of the Company's business and its strong cash flows provide the Company with the ability to minimize the effect of mismatched durations and/or yields identified by various asset adequacy analyses. From time to time or when market opportunities arise, the Company disposes of selected fixed maturity securities that are available for sale to improve the duration matching of assets and liabilities, improve future investment yields, and/or re-balance its portfolio. As a result, dispositions before maturity can vary significantly from year to year.

As part of its overall corporate strategy, the Company announced in September 2018 that it intends to increase its original investment in the Aflac Ventures Fund from $100 million over three years to $250 million over three to four years, as opportunities emerge. These investments are included in equity securities or the other investments line in the consolidated balance sheets. The Aflac Ventures Fund is a subsidiary of Aflac Corporate Ventures which is reported in the "Corporate and other" business segment. The central mission of Aflac Corporate Ventures is to support the organic growth and business development needs of Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. with emphasis on digital applications designed to improve the customer experience, gain efficiencies, and develop new markets in an effort to enhance and defend long-term shareholder value.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussiondetails on certain investment commitments.

Financing Activities

Consolidated cash used by financing activities was $1.6 billion in 2018, $2.1 billion in 2017 and $1.6 billion in 2016.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of its senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In January 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of .932% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 10-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

73




In February 2017, the Parent Company extinguished $650 million of 2.65% senior notes upon their maturity.

In October 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of subordinated debentures through a U.S. public debt offering. The debentures bear interest at an initial rate of 2.108% per annum through October 22, 2027, or earlier redemption. Thereafter, the rate of the interest of the debentures will be reset every five years at a rate of interest equal to the then-current JPY 5-year Swap Offered Rate plus 205 basis points. The debentures are payable semi-annually in arrears and have a 30-year maturity. The debentures are redeemable (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax events or certain rating agency events, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the debentures or (ii) in 10 years, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption. In November 2017, the Parent Company used a portion of net proceeds from the debenture offering to redeem $500 million of the Parent Company's 5.50% subordinated debentures due 2052. The pretax non-operating expense due to the early redemption of these investments.notes was $13 million.


CashIn September 2016, the Parent Company issued two series of senior notes totaling $700 million through a U.S. public debt offering. The first series, which totaled $300 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.875% per annum, payable semi-annually, and cash equivalentshas a 10-year maturity. The second series, which totaled $4.4$400 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 30-year maturity.

In September 2016, the Parent Company entered into two series of senior unsecured term loan facilities totaling 30.0 billion yen. The first series, which totaled 5.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to the TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .20% and .60%, or 4.1% of total investments and cash,depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second series, which totaled 25.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .35% and .75%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In December 2016, the Parent Company completed a tender offer in which it extinguished $176 million principal of its 6.90% senior notes due 2039 and $193 million principal of its 6.45% senior notes due 2040. The pretax non-operating loss due to the early redemption of these notes was $137 million ($89 million after-tax, or $.21 per diluted share).

In September 2016, the Parent Company extinguished 8.0 billion yen of 2.26% fixed rate Uridashi notes upon their maturity and in July 2016, the Parent Company extinguished 15.8 billion yen of 1.84% fixed rate Samurai notes upon their maturity.

See Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the debt issuances discussed above.

See the preceding discussion in this Capital Resources and Liquidity section of MD&A for details and any outstanding balances as of December 31, 20152018 for the Company's lines of credit and FHLB financing arrangement.

The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2018.

Cash returned to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases was $2.1 billion in 2018, compared with $4.7$2.0 billion or 4.3%, at in 2017 and $2.1 billion in 2016.

The following tables present a summary of treasury stock activity during the years ended December 31.
Treasury Stock Purchased
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016 
Treasury stock purchases$1,301
 $1,351
 $1,422
 
Number of shares purchased:      
Open market28,949
 35,510
 43,236
 
Other392
 1,018
 660
 
   Total shares purchased29,341
 36,528
 43,896
 

74



Treasury Stock Issued
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016 
Stock issued from treasury:      
   Cash financing$58
 $33
 $46
 
   Noncash financing17
 59
 61
 
   Total stock issued from treasury$75
 $92
 $107
 
Number of shares issued1,939
 2,554
 3,704
 

Under share repurchase authorizations from the Company's board of directors, the Company purchased 28.9 million shares of its common stock in the open market in 2018, compared with 35.5 million shares in 2017 and 43.2 million shares in 2016. As of December 31, 20142018, a remaining balance of 69.0 million shares of the Company's common stock was available for purchase under share repurchase authorizations by its board of directors. The Company currently plans to repurchase $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion of its common stock in 2019, assuming stable capital conditions and absent compelling alternatives. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Cash dividends paid to shareholders in 2018 of $1.04 per share increased 19.5% over 2017. ForThe 2017 dividend paid of $.87 per share increased 4.8% over 2016. The following table presents the dividend activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Dividends paid in cash$793
 $661
 $658
 
Dividends through issuance of treasury shares8
 29
 27
 
Total dividends to shareholders$801
 $690
 $685
 

In January 2019, the board of directors announced a 3.8% increase in the quarterly cash dividend, effective with the first quarter of 2019. The first quarter 2019 cash dividend of $.27 per share is payable on March 1, 2019, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 20, 2019.

Regulatory Restrictions

Aflac and CAIC are domiciled in Nebraska and are subject to its regulations. Subsequent to the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, Aflac Japan is domiciled in Japan and subject to local regulations. See further discussion
below. The Nebraska Department of Insurance imposes certain limitations and restrictions on payments of dividends, management fees, loans and advances to the Parent Company. Under Nebraska insurance law, prior approval of the Nebraska Department of Insurance is required for dividend distributions that exceed the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. In addition, the Nebraska insurance department must approve service arrangements and other transactions within the affiliated group of companies. These regulatory limitations are not expected to affect the level of management fees or dividends paid to the Parent Company. (See below for discussion of restrictions imposed by Japanese insurance regulators.) A life insurance company’s statutory capital and surplus is determined according to rules prescribed by the factors affecting our cash balance, seeNAIC, as modified by the Operating Activities, Investing Activitiesinsurance department in the insurance company’s state of domicile. Statutory accounting rules are different from U.S. GAAP and Financing Activities subsectionsare intended to emphasize policyholder protection and company solvency. Similar laws apply in New York, the domiciliary jurisdiction of Aflac's New York insurance subsidiary. As of December 2016, CAIC was redomiciled from South Carolina to Nebraska.

The continued long-term growth of the Company's business may require increases in the statutory capital and surplus of its insurance operations. Aflac’s insurance operations may secure additional statutory capital through various sources, such as internally generated statutory earnings, capital contributions by the Parent Company from funds generated through debt or equity offerings, or reinsurance transactions. The NAIC’s RBC formula is used by insurance regulators to help identify inadequately capitalized insurance companies. The RBC formula quantifies insurance risk, business risk, asset risk and interest rate risk by weighing the types and mixtures of risks inherent in the insurer’s operations.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 560%. The 2018 RBC as filed is lower than Aflac U.S. standalone RBC due to the inclusion of Aflac Japan for the first quarter of 2018. The RBC charge reflects the business risk without any total adjusted capital (TAC). At December 31, 2017, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 831%, which included Aflac Japan. Aflac's RBC ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position, even reflecting the full negative impact of the U.S. Tax Act, which was fully adopted in 2018. This reduction occurs as a result of

75



writing down deferred tax assets and the increase in required capital due to the reduction in tax rates. However, Aflac expects to recover from this MD&A.negative impact over a period of three to five years through additional statutory income, assuming that the additional income is fully retained. As of December 31, 2018, Aflac's total adjusted capital of $2.7 billion exceeded the company action level required capital and surplus of $.5 billion by $2.2 billion.


The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid to the Parent Company by Aflac without prior approval of Nebraska's director of insurance is the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. Dividends declared by Aflac during 2019 in excess of $1.3 billion would be considered extraordinary and require such approval. Following the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, the Company used extraordinary dividends as needed to actively manage to appropriate RBC levels that are lower yet sufficient to maintain ratings and support prudent capital management. See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the impact of permitted practices by the Nebraska Department of Insurance on the Company's statutory capital and surplus.

The NAIC considers its Solvency Modernization Initiative (SMI) process relating to updating the U.S. insurance solvency regulation framework to be ongoing. The SMI has focused on key issues such as capital requirements, governance and risk management, group supervision, reinsurance, statutory accounting and financial reporting matters. Many of these key issues have been finalized and/or are near completion; however, the NAIC still has some ongoing initiatives related to SMI, such as monitoring the international efforts on group capital requirements as well as RBC.In addition, the NAIC is also considering changes to investment risk factors. Any negative developments by the NAIC in these areas could result in increased capital requirements for the Company.

Aflac is subject to the NAIC’s Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA), effective January 1, 2015. Through the ORSA requirements, Aflac is expected to regularly, no less than annually, conduct an ORSA to assess the adequacy of its risk management framework, and its current and estimated projected future solvency position; internally document the process and results of the assessment; and provide a confidential high-level ORSA Summary Report annually to the lead state commissioner if the insurer is a member of an insurance group. In November 2018, Aflac filed its ORSA report with the Nebraska Department of Insurance.

In addition to limitations and restrictions imposed by U.S. insurance regulators, after the Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, the new Japan subsidiary is required to meet certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law in order to provide dividends to the Parent Company. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at the Japan subsidiary is basically defined as retained earnings excluding capital reserves, which represent equity generated by capital profits that are statutorily required in Japan, less net after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities based on the previous fiscal year-end. These dividend capacity requirements are generally aligned with the solvency margin ratio (SMR). Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) maintains its own solvency standard which is quantified through the SMR. Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread, and foreign exchange rate changes, therefore the Company continues to evaluate alternatives for reducing this sensitivity. In the event of a rapid change in market risk conditions causing SMR to decline, the Company has two senior unsecured revolving credit facilities in the amounts of 100 billion yen and 55 billion yen, respectively, and a committed reinsurance facility in the amount of approximately 110 billion yen as a capital contingency plan. Additionally, the Company could take action to enter into derivatives on unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments with foreign currency options or forwards. (See Notes 8 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.)

The Company has already undertaken various measures to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR. For additional information concerning ourexample, the Company employs policy reserve matching (PRM) investment strategies, which is a Japan-specific accounting treatment that reduces SMR interest rate sensitivity since PRM-designated investments seeare carried at amortized cost consistent with corresponding liabilities. In order for a PRM-designated asset to be held at amortized cost, there are certain criteria that must be maintained. The primary criteria relates to maintaining the duration of designated assets and liabilities within a specified tolerance range. If the duration difference is not maintained within the specified range without rebalancing, then a certain portion of the assets must be re-classified as available for sale and held at fair value with any associated unrealized gain or loss recorded in surplus. To rebalance, assets may need to be sold in order to maintain the duration with the specified range, resulting in realizing a gain or loss from the sale. For U.S. GAAP, PRM investments are categorized as available for sale. The Company also uses foreign currency derivatives to hedge a portion of its U.S. dollar-denominated investments.(See Notes 3, 4 and 58 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's investment strategies, hedging activities, and reinsurance, respectively.)

Aflac's SMR ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position. As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan's SMR was 965%, compared with 1,064% at December 31, 2017. As part of the conversion of Aflac Japan from a

76



branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018, the Company experienced an accounting-driven decline in the SMR of approximately 130 points, compared with the SMR as of December 31, 2017. The Company expects to be able to pay dividends out of certain accounts, thus restoring this accounting impact over an estimated three-year period.

The FSA has been conducting field testing with the insurance industry concerning the introduction of an economic value-based solvency regime. The field testing will assist the FSA in determining if an economic value-based solvency regime in Japan will be appropriate for the insurance industry.

Payments are made from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company for management fees, allocated expenses and remittances of earnings. Prior to the Aflac Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan paid allocated expenses and profit remittances to Aflac U.S. The following table details Aflac Japan remittances for the years ended December 31.

Aflac Japan Remittances
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan management fees paid to Parent Company$136
 $93
 $79
 
Expenses allocated to Aflac Japan (in dollars)24
 109
 106
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in dollars)808
 1,150
 1,286
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in yen)89.7
 129.3
 138.5
 

The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to prior years due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. See the preceding Hedging Activities subsection of this MD&A for discussion of Parent Company hedging of yen profit remittances. For additional information on regulatory restrictions on dividends, profit remittances and other transfers, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Other

For information regarding commitments and contingent liabilities, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Additional Information

Investors should note that the Company announces material financial information in its SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls. In accordance with SEC guidance, the Company may also use the Investor Relations section of the Company's website (http://investors.aflac.com) to communicate with investors about the Company. It is possible that the financial and other information the Company posts there could be deemed to be material information. The information on the Company's website is not part of this document.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed primarily to the following types of market risks: currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and equity risk. Fluctuations in these factors could impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The Company regularly monitors its market risks and uses a variety of strategies to manage its exposure
to these market risks.

Currency Risk

Aflac Japan

The functional currency of Aflac Japan's insurance operations is the Japanese yen. Aflac Japan’s premiums and a significant portion of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Most of Aflac Japan's cash and liabilities are yen-denominated.

77




As discussed above in the Investment subsection of Item 1, Business, the Company engages in hedging activities to mitigate certain currency risks from holding U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan. However, this hedging program in turn poses a countervailing long-term risk of loss on hedging currency derivatives under the long-term scenario of weakening yen, and related derivative rollover risk that could amplify hedge cost in unfavorable market conditions and significantly increase liquidity requirements to support negative derivative settlements. Additionally, as discussed in detail in the Risk Factors section titled “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity,” there is a risk that losses realized on derivative settlements during periods of weakening yen may not be recouped through realization of the corresponding holding currency gains on the hedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments if these investments are not ultimately converted to yen. The following table details Aflac Japan's portfolio allocation by currency as of December 31.

Japan Segment Portfolio Allocation by Currency
(In millions) 2018 2017 
  
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
USD program $24,435
$24,258
 $22,432
$23,716
 
Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen 1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
 
   Total dollar-denominated investments 26,114
26,527
 24,082
26,265
 
   Total yen-denominated investments 74,974
86,251
 72,369
84,379
 
      Total $101,088
$112,778
 $96,451
$110,644
 

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and $9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the U.S. dollar-denominated investments (USD Program). The fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

As noted above, in late 2017, the Company took steps to refine the strategy to mitigate currency exposure of Aflac Japan from U.S. dollar-denominated investments while balancing the consideration of the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan. This refinement in strategy resulted in an increased amount of the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan while at the same time mitigating hedge cost increases. Generally, Aflac Japan’s exposure to the currency risk increases when its portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments increases. This increases the volatility of the SMR and FSA earnings and may result in an adverse impact on these regulatory measures when yen appreciates relatively to U.S. dollar. This in turn may reduce Aflac Japan’s dividend capacity, as well as increase the level of capital needed to support increased SMR volatility. The adverse impact on the regulatory measures could be amplified by regulatory accounting rules requiring impairment loss recognition on prolonged significant declines in U.S. dollar relative to yen. Furthermore, under the scenario where unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments are needed to pay Aflac Japan’s yen-denominated obligations, they would have to be converted to yen, which could force realization of the then potential currency losses. As the value of the U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio in Aflac Japan fluctuates and the Company’s business model evolves, the Company periodically reevaluates this size of the unhedged portfolio and may accordingly adjust up or down its currency hedging targets.

Aflac Inc.

The Company is exposed to currency risk as an economic event when yen funds are actually converted into U.S. dollars. This occurs when yen-denominated funds are paid as dividends and management fees from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company and with quarterly settlements of its reinsurance retrocession transactions. The exchange rates prevailing at the time of yen payments will differ from the exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. A portion of the yen dividend and management fee payments may be used to service Aflac Incorporated's yen-denominated notes payable with the remainder converted into U.S. dollars.

In addition to yen payments and the reinsurance retrocessions, certain investment activities for Aflac Japan expose the Company to economic currency risk when yen are converted into U.S. dollars. As noted above, the Company invests a portion of its yen cash flows in U.S. dollar-denominated assets. This requires that the Company convert the yen cash flows to U.S. dollars before investing. As previously discussed, for certain of its U.S. dollar-denominated securities, the Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of hedged

78



investments. In 2018, the Parent Company entered into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency rate risk to dividend payments by Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. If the markets experience a significant strengthening of yen, this could cause cash strain at the Parent Company as a result of cash collateral and potentially cash settlement requirements. Based on the timing and severity of exchange rate fluctuations combined with the level of outstanding activity in this program, the cash strain at the Parent Company could be significant.
Aside from the activities discussed above, the Company generally does not convert yen into U.S. dollars; however, it does translate financial statement amounts from yen into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, reported amounts are affected by foreign currency fluctuations. The Company reports unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income. In periods when the yen weakens against the dollar, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes more U.S. dollars to be reported. The weakening of the yen relative to the U.S. dollar will generally adversely affect the value of the Company's yen-denominated investments in U.S. dollar terms. The Company also considers the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan and related exposure to foreign currency. The Company manages this currency risk by investing a portion of Aflac Japan's investment portfolio in U.S. dollar-denominated securities and by the Parent Company's issuance of yen-denominated debt (for additional information, see the discussion under the Investments subsection within Item 1, Business). As a result, the effect of currency fluctuations on the Company's net assets is reduced.
The following table demonstrates the effect of foreign currency fluctuations by presenting the dollar values of the Company's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, and its consolidated yen-denominated net asset exposure at selected exchange rates as of December 31.

79



Dollar Value of Yen-Denominated Assets and Liabilities
at Selected Exchange Rates
(In millions)2018 2017 
Yen/dollar exchange rates96.00
 
111.00 (1)

 126.00
 98.00
 
113.00(1)

 128.00
 
Yen-denominated financial instruments:            
Assets:            
Securities available for sale:            
Fixed maturity securities (2)
$55,600
 $48,086
 $42,362
 $51,504
 $44,666
 $39,433
 
Fixed maturity securities - consolidated
variable interest entities
 (3)
941
 814
 717
 1,089
 944
 834
 
Securities held to maturity:            
Fixed maturity securities35,055
 30,318
 26,709
 36,240
 31,430
 27,747
 
Equity securities742
 641
 565
 126
 109
 96
 
Equity securities - consolidated variable
interest entities
0
 0
 0
 675
 586
 517
 
Cash and cash equivalents988
 855
 753
 222
 193
 170
 
Derivatives2,712
 417
 949
 1,961
 331
 528
 
Other financial instruments253
 219
 192
 228
 198
 175
 
Subtotal96,291
 81,350
 72,247
 92,045
 78,457
 69,500
 
Liabilities:            
Notes payable2,120
 1,831
 1,615
 1,535
 1,331
 1,175
 
Derivatives1,318
 387
 2,138
 516
 474
 2,177
 
Subtotal3,438
 2,218
 3,753
 2,051
 1,805
 3,352
 
Net yen-denominated financial instruments92,853
 79,132
 68,494
 89,994
 76,652
 66,148
 
Other yen-denominated assets10,795
 9,336
 8,225
 9,406
 8,157
 7,201
 
Other yen-denominated liabilities113,994
 98,590
 86,853
 107,761
 93,456
 82,504
 
Consolidated yen-denominated net assets
(liabilities) subject to foreign currency
fluctuation
(2)
$(10,346) $(10,122) $(10,134) $(8,361) $(8,647) $(9,155) 
(1) Actual period-end exchange rate
(2) Does not include the U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds for which the Company has entered into foreign currency derivatives as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A
(3) Does not include U.S. dollar-denominated bonds that have corresponding cross-currency swaps in consolidated VIEs

The Company is required to consolidate certain VIEs. Some of the consolidated VIEs in Aflac Japan's portfolio use foreign currency swaps to convert foreign denominated cash flows to yen, the functional currency of Aflac Japan, in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations. Foreign currency swaps exchange an initial principal amount in two currencies, agreeing to re-exchange the currencies at a future date, at an agreed upon exchange rate. There may also be periodic exchanges of payments at specified intervals based on the agreed upon rates and notional amounts. Prior to consolidation, the Company's beneficial interest in these VIEs was a yen-denominated available-for-sale fixed maturity security. Upon consolidation, the original yen-denominated investment was derecognized and the underlying fixed maturity securities and cross-currency swaps were recognized. The combination of a U.S. dollar-denominated investment and cross-currency swap economically creates a yen-denominated investment and has no impact on the Company's net investment hedge position.

Similarly, the combination of the U.S. corporate bonds and the foreign currency forwards and options that the Company has entered into, as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A, economically creates a yen-denominated investment that qualifies for inclusion as a component of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan for net investment hedge purposes.

For additional information regarding the Company's Aflac Japan net investment hedge, see the Hedging Activities subsection of MD&A.


80



Interest Rate Risk

The Company's primary interest rate exposure is to the impact of changes in interest rates on the fair value of its investments in debt securities. The Company monitors its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis utilizing a full valuation methodology, measuring price volatility, and sensitivity of the fair values of its investments to interest rate changes on the debt securities the Company owns. For example, if the current duration of a debt security is 10 years, then the fair value of that security will increase by approximately 10% if market interest rates decrease by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant. Likewise, the fair value of the debt security will decrease by approximately 10% if market interest rates increase by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant.

The estimated effect of potential increases in interest rates on the fair values of debt securities the Company owns; derivatives, excluding credit default swaps, and notes payable as of December 31 follows:

Sensitivity of Fair Values of Financial Instruments
to Interest Rate Changes
  2018 2017
(In millions)Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
 Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
Assets:             
Debt securities:             
     Fixed maturity securities:             
          Yen-denominated $85,622
  $73,673
   $83,682
  $72,146
 
          Dollar-denominated 33,995
  31,327
   38,703
  35,518
 
             Total debt securities $119,617
  $105,000
   $122,385
  $107,664
 
Loans and loan receivables(1)
 $6,893
  $6,834
   $2,987
  $2,932
 
Derivatives $417
  $614
   $330
  $533
 
Liabilities:             
Notes payable(2)
 $5,876
  $5,415
   $5,553
  $4,900
 
Derivatives 387
  422
   474
  293
 
(1)Includes TREs, CMLs and MMLs, excludes policy loans
(2)Excludes capitalized lease obligations

There are various factors that affect the fair value of the Company's investment in debt securities. Included in those factors are changes in the prevailing interest rate environment, which directly affect the balance of unrealized gains or losses for a given period in relation to a prior period. Decreases in market yields generally improve the fair value of debt securities, while increases in market yields generally have a negative impact on the fair value of the Company's debt securities. However, the Company does not expect to realize a majority of any unrealized gains or losses. For additional information on unrealized losses on debt securities, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac Japan's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)2018 2017 
Yen-denominated debt securities16
 15
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years15
 14
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force10
 10
 


81



The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)2018 2017 
Dollar-denominated debt securities9
 10
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years8
 8
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force6
 6
 

The following table shows a comparison of average required interest rates for future policy benefits and investment yields, based on amortized cost, for the years ended December 31.
Comparison of Interest Rates for Future Policy Benefits
and Investment Yields
(Net of Investment Expenses)
  201820172016
  U.S.        JapanU.S.        JapanU.S.        Japan
Policies issued during year:                  
Required interest on policy reserves 3.69%  1.00%
(1) 
 3.69%  1.10%
(1) 
 3.67%  1.38%
(1) 
New money yield on investments 4.44
  2.94
  4.41
  1.88
  3.81
  1.30
 
Policies in force at year-end:                  
Required interest on policy reserves 5.34
  3.29
(1) 
 5.43
  3.38
(1) 
 5.51
  3.49
(1) 
Portfolio book yield, end of period 5.44
  2.49
  5.44
  2.46
  5.52
  2.52
 
(1)Represents investments for Aflac Japan that support policy obligations and therefore excludes Aflac Japan’s annuity products

The Company continues to monitor the spread between its new money yield and the required interest assumption for newly issued products in both the United States and Japan and will re-evaluate those assumptions as necessary. Currently, when investments the Company owns mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that of the interest required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. Overall, adequate profit margins exist in Aflac Japan's aggregate block of business because of changes in the mix of business and favorable experience from mortality, morbidity and expenses.

Periodically, the Company may enter into derivative transactions to hedge interest rate risk, depending on general economic conditions.

For further information on interest rate derivatives, see Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Credit Risk

A significant portion of the Company's investment portfolio consists of debt securities and loans that expose it to the credit risk of the underlying issuer or borrower. The Company carefully evaluates this risk on every new investment and closely monitors the credit risk of its existing investment portfolio. The Company incorporates the needs of its products and liabilities, the overall requirements of the business, and other factors in addition to its underwriting of the credit risk for each investment in the portfolio.

Evaluating the underlying risks in the Company's credit portfolio involves a multitude of factors including but not limited to its assessment of the issuer's or borrower's business activities, assets, products, market position, financial condition, and future prospects. The Company incorporates the assessment of the NRSROs in assigning credit ratings and incorporates the rating methodologies of its specialist external managers in assigning loan ratings to portfolio holdings. The Company performs extensive internal assessments of the credit risks for all its portfolio holdings and potential new investments, which includes using analyses provided by the Company's specialist external managers. For assets managed by external asset managers, the Company provides investment and credit risk parameters that must be used when making investment decisions and require ongoing monitoring and reporting from the asset managers on significant changes in credit risks within the portfolio.


82



Investment Concentrations

The Company's 15 largest global investment exposures were as follows:

Largest Global Investment Positions
(In millions)
December 31, 2018
    Total % of Total  
No. Consolidated Corporate/Sovereign Exposure Consolidated Fixed Maturity Credit
    Book Value Securities Rating
1 
Japan National Government (1)
 $51,207
 47.78% A+
2 Bank of America NA 411
 .38
  
      Bank of America Corp. 231
 .21
 A-
      Bank of America Corp. 180
 .17
 BBB+
3 Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. 405
 .38
 A-
4 Investcorp SA 383
 .36
 BB
5 Republic of South Africa 360
 .34
 BB+
6 Banobras 333
 .31
 BBB+
7 Nordea Bank AB 302
 .28
  
      Nordea Bank AB 231
 .21
 A-
      Nordea Bank AB 71
 .07
 BBB+
8 AXA 293
 .27
 BBB+
9 Deutsche Telekom AG 291
 .27
 BBB+
10 Japan Expswy Hld and Debt 291
 .27
 A+
11 CFE 287
 .27
 BBB+
12 AT&T Inc. 281
 .27
 BBB
13 Czech Republic 270
 .25
 A+
14 Investor AB 270
 .25
 AA-
15 Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) 270
 .25
 BBB+
                   Subtotal $55,654
 51.93%  
  Total fixed maturity securities $107,174
 100.00%  
(1)JGBs or JGB-backed securities
As previously disclosed, the Company owns long-dated debt instruments in support of its long-dated policyholder obligations. Some of the Company's largest global investment holdings are positions that were purchased many years ago and increased in size due to merger and consolidation activity among the issuing entities. In addition, many of the Company's largest holdings are yen-denominated, therefore strengthening of the yen can increase its position in dollars, and weakening of the yen can decrease its position in dollars. The Company's global investment guidelines establish concentration limits for its investment portfolios.

Geographical Exposure

The following table indicates the geographic exposure of the Company's debt securities as of December 31.

83



 2018 2017 
(In millions)Amortized Cost % of
Total
 Amortized Cost % of
Total
 
Japan$55,486
 51.8% $51,983
 48.8% 
United States and Canada (1)
29,371
 27.4
 31,052
 29.1
 
United Kingdom3,038
 2.8
 2,603
 2.4
 
Germany2,179
 2.0
 2,323
 2.2
 
France2,030
 1.9
 1,983
 1.9
 
Peripheral Eurozone2,165
 2.0
 2,312
 2.2
 
     Portugal215
 .2
 211
 .2
 
     Italy1,261
 1.2
 1,261
 1.2
 
     Ireland29
 .0
 32
 .0
 
     Spain660
 .6
 808
 .8
 
Nordic Region1,615
 1.6
 1,611
 1.5
 
     Sweden779
 .7
 725
 .7
 
     Norway378
 .4
 451
 .4
 
     Denmark270
 .3
 177
 .2
 
     Finland188
 .2
 258
 .2
 
Other Europe2,425
 2.3
 2,489
 2.3
 
     Netherlands1,206
 1.1
 1,183
 1.1
 
     Switzerland258
 .2
 307
 .3
 
     Czech Republic451
 .5
 442
 .4
 
     Austria125
 .1
 123
 .1
 
     Belgium178
 .2
 168
 .1
 
     Poland180
 .2
 177
 .2
 
     Luxembourg27
 .0
 89
 .1
 
Asia excluding Japan2,722
 2.5
 3,408
 3.2
 
Africa and Middle East2,018
 1.9
 2,460
 2.3
 
Latin America2,153
 2.0
 2,318
 2.2
 
Australia1,620
 1.5
 1,572
 1.5
 
All Others352
 .3
 448
 .4
 
     Total fixed maturity securities$107,174
 100.0% $106,562
 100.0% 
(1) Includes total exposure to Puerto Rico of $1 million of required deposits at both December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of which 100% had principal and interest insurance at both December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The primary factor considered when determining the domicile of investment exposure is the legal country risk location of the issuer. However, other factors such as the location of the parent guarantor, the location of the company's headquarters or major business operations (including location of major assets), location of primary market (including location of revenue generation) and specific country risk publicly recognized by rating agencies can influence the assignment of the country (or geographic) risk location. When the issuer is a special financing vehicle or a branch or subsidiary of a global company, then the Company considers any guarantees and/or legal, regulatory and corporate relationships of the issuer relative to its ultimate parent in determining the proper assignment of country risk.


84



Derivative Counterparties
The Company is a direct counterparty to the foreign currency swaps that it has entered into in connection with certain of its senior notes and subordinated debentures; foreign currency forwards; foreign currency options; and interest rate swaptions, therefore the Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties in those contracts. For the foreign currency and credit default swaps associated with the Company's VIE investments for which it is the primary beneficiary, the Company bears the risk of foreign exchange and/or credit loss due to counterparty default even though it is not a direct counterparty to those contracts. The risk of counterparty default for the Company's VIE and senior note and subordinated debenture swaps, foreign currency swaps, certain foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options and interest rate swaptions is mitigated by collateral posting requirements that counterparties to those transactions must meet. If collateral posting agreements are not in place, the counterparty risk associated with foreign currency forwards and foreign currency options is the risk that at expiry of the contract, the counterparty is unable to deliver the agreed upon amount of yen at the agreed upon price or delivery date, thus exposing the Company to additional unhedged exposure to U.S. dollars in the Aflac Japan investment portfolio. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs

The calculation of DAC and the liability for future policy benefits requires the use of estimates based on sound actuarial valuation techniques. For new policy issues, the Company reviews its actuarial assumptions and deferrable acquisition costs each year and revise them when necessary to more closely reflect recent experience and studies of actual acquisition costs. For policies in force, the Company evaluates DAC by major product groupings to determine that they are recoverable from future revenues, and any amounts determined not to be recoverable are charged against net earnings. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the DAC activity for the past two years.

Policy Liabilities

The following table provides details of policy liabilities by segment and in total as of December 31.
Policy Liabilities
(In millions)2018 2017
Japan segment:   
Future policy benefits$77,812
 $73,661
Unpaid policy claims2,857
 2,692
Other policy liabilities12,122
 12,779
Total Japan policy liabilities$92,791
 $89,132
U.S. segment:   
Future policy benefits$9,137
 $8,806
Unpaid policy claims1,727
 1,700
Other policy liabilities117
 119
Total U.S. policy liabilities$10,981
 $10,625
Consolidated:   
Future policy benefits$86,368
 $81,857
Unpaid policy claims4,584
 4,392
Other policy liabilities12,236
 12,898
Total consolidated policy liabilities(1)
$103,188
 $99,147
(1) The sum of the Japan and U.S. segments exceeds the total due to reinsurance and retrocession activity.

The Company's policy liabilities, which are determined in accordance with applicable guidelines as defined under U.S. GAAP and Actuarial Standards of Practice, include two components that involve analysis and judgment: future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims, which accounted for 84% and 4% of total policy liabilities as of December 31, 2018, respectively.

Future policy benefits provide for claims that will occur in the future and are generally calculated as the present value of future expected benefits to be incurred less the present value of future expected net benefit premiums. The Company calculates future policy benefits based on assumptions of morbidity, mortality, persistency and interest. These assumptions are generally established at the time a policy is issued. The assumptions used in the calculations are closely

43



related to those used in developing the gross premiums for a policy. As required by U.S. GAAP, the Company also includes a provision for adverse deviation, which is intended to accommodate adverse fluctuations in actual experience.

Unpaid policy claims include those claims that have been incurred and are in the process of payment as well as an estimate of those claims that have been incurred but have not yet been reported to the Company. The Company computes unpaid policy claims on a non-discounted basis using statistical analyses of historical claims payments, adjusted for current trends and changed conditions. The Company updates the assumptions underlying the estimate of unpaid policy claims regularly and incorporates its historical experience as well as other data that provides information regarding the Company's outstanding liability.

The Company's insurance products provide fixed-benefit amounts per occurrence that are not subject to medical-cost inflation. Furthermore, the Company's business is widely dispersed in both the United States and Japan. This geographic dispersion and the nature of the Company's benefit structure mitigate the risk of a significant unexpected increase in claims payments due to epidemics and events of a catastrophic nature. Claims incurred under Aflac's policies are generally reported and paid in a relatively short time frame. The unpaid claims liability is sensitive to morbidity assumptions, in particular, severity and frequency of claims. Severity is the ultimate size of a claim, and frequency is the number of claims incurred. The Company's claims experience is primarily related to the demographics of its policyholders.

As a part of its established financial reporting and accounting practices and controls, the Company performs detailed annual actuarial reviews of its policyholder liabilities (gross premium valuation, GPV, analysis) and reflects the results of those reviews in its results of operations and financial condition as required by U.S. GAAP. For Aflac Japan, the Company's annual review in 2016 indicated that it needed to strengthen the liability associated with a block of care policies, primarily due to low investment yields. The Company strengthened its future policy benefits liability by $52 million in 2016 as a result of this review. Results of the Company’s annual review in 2018 and 2017 concluded that no further strengthening was required for these liabilities. For Aflac U.S., the Company's annual reviews in 2018, 2017 and 2016 indicated no need to strengthen liabilities associated with policies in the United States. In the U.S. and Japan, investment assumptions were reviewed in 2017 and the Company adopted expected forward rates in its GPV yield projections. In addition, in Japan, assets were allocated to blocks of business to align with yield and duration requirements of the businesses.

The table below reflects the growth of the future policy benefits liability for the years ended December 31.
Future Policy Benefits
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2018 2017 2016 
Aflac U.S.$9,137
 $8,806
 $8,442
 
Growth rate3.8%
4.3%
4.4%
Aflac Japan$77,812
 $73,661
 $68,291
 
Growth rate5.6%
7.9%
9.7%
Consolidated$86,368
 $81,857
 $76,106
 
Growth rate5.5%
7.6%
9.2%
Yen/dollar exchange rate (end of period)111.00
 113.00
 116.49
 
Aflac Japan (in yen)8,637
 8,324
 7,955
 
Growth rate3.8%
4.6%
6.0%

The growth of the future policy benefits liability in yen for Aflac Japan and in dollars for Aflac U.S. has been due to the aging of the Company's in-force block of business and the addition of new business.

In computing the estimate of unpaid policy claims, the Company considers many factors, including the benefits and amounts available under the policy; the volume and demographics of the policies exposed to claims; and internal business practices, such as incurred date assignment and current claim administrative practices. The Company monitors these conditions closely and make adjustments to the liability as actual experience emerges. Claim levels are generally stable from period to period; however, fluctuations in claim levels may occur. In calculating the unpaid policy claim liability, the Company does not calculate a range of estimates. The following table shows the expected sensitivity of the unpaid policy claims liability as of December 31, 2018, to changes in severity and frequency of claims.

44



Sensitivity of Unpaid Policy Claims Liability
(In millions) Total Severity 
Total FrequencyDecrease
by 2%
 Decrease
by 1%
 Unchanged Increase
by 1%
 Increase
by 2%
Increase by 2% $0
   $25
   $50
   $75
   $101
 
Increase by 1% (24)   0
   25
   50
   75
 
Unchanged (49)   (25)   0
   25
   50
 
Decrease by 1% (73)   (49)   (25)   0
   25
 
Decrease by 2% (97)   (73)   (49)   (24)   0
 

Other policy liabilities, which accounted for 12% of total policy liabilities as of December 31, 2018, consisted primarily of annuity and unearned premium reserves, and discounted advance premiums on deposit from policyholders in conjunction with their purchase of certain Aflac Japan insurance products. These advanced premiums are deferred upon collection and recognized as premium revenue over the contractual premium payment period. Advanced premiums represented 29% and 34% of the December 31, 2018 and 2017 other policy liabilities balances, respectively. See the Aflac Japan segment subsection of this MD&A for further information.

Income Taxes

Income tax provisions are generally based on pretax earnings reported for financial statement purposes, which differ from those amounts used in preparing the Company's income tax returns. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the Company expects the temporary differences to reverse. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with U.S. GAAP is a two-step process. Under the first step, the enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The second step is measurement, whereby a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that an amount will not be realized. The determination of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets requires management to make certain judgments and assumptions.

In evaluating the ability to recover deferred tax assets, the Company's management considers all available evidence, including taxable income in open carry back years, the existence of cumulative losses in the most recent years, forecasted earnings, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, future taxable temporary difference reversals, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In the event the Company determines it is not more likely than not that it will be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, a valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Likewise, if it is later determined that it is more likely than not that those deferred tax assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed. Future economic conditions and market volatility, including increases in interest rates or widening credit spreads, can adversely impact the Company’s tax planning strategies and in particular the Company’s ability to utilize tax benefits on previously recognized capital losses. The Company's judgments and assumptions are subject to change given the inherent uncertainty in predicting future performance and specific industry and investment market conditions.

The Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, effective January 1, 2018 the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated or reduced certain deductions and credits, and limited the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation.

The Tax Act also transitions international corporate taxation from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system, which in light of the current tax treatment of Aflac Japan has the effect of subjecting the earnings of Aflac Japan to Japan taxation and subjecting the Company’s other earnings, including the consolidated earnings of the Parent Company, to U.S. taxation.

These changes became effective on January 1, 2018. Because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the period of enactment, during the period ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recorded, as its reasonable estimate, a net deferred tax liability reduction of $1.9 billion as of that date. While the Company believes that this estimate was reasonable, it is relying upon guidance provided by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118) that provided a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date of December 22, 2017, in order to complete the accounting for the effects of the Tax Act. This estimate was subject to new and

45



changing regulations, interpretations and tax guidance in the future, as well as further refinement of the Company’s calculations and changes in the interpretations and assumptions that the Company had made. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability.
For additional information on income tax, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this report.

Future Adoption of Accounting Standard for Long-Duration Insurance Contracts

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-12, “Financial Services - Insurance, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts.” The update, which is expected to significantly change how insurers account for long-duration contracts, amends existing recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements applicable to the Company. Issues addressed in the new guidance include: 1) a requirement to review and, if there is a change, update assumptions for the liability for future policy benefits at least annually, and to update the discount rate assumption quarterly, 2) accounting for market risk benefits at fair value, 3) simplified amortization for deferred acquisition costs, and 4) enhanced financial statement presentation and disclosures. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application of the amendments is permitted, however, the Company does not expect to early adopt the updated standard.

The Company is thoroughly evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2018-12 and expects that the adoption will have a significant impact on the Company’s reported financial position, results of operations, and disclosures under U.S. GAAP accounting. The Company anticipates that the requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits will have a significant impact on its results of operations, while the requirement to update the discount rate will have a significant impact on its accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and equity. There are two permitted transition methods upon adoption, full retrospective and modified retrospective. Under the full retrospective method, the Company would restate all historical periods based upon actual historical experience as of contract inception and its updated view of the contractual cash flow projections at transition. A cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings would be recognized to reflect the actual experience and updated projections. The update of the discount rate would be recognized in AOCI. The Company will be permitted to apply a full retrospective transition approach if actual historical information is available for all contracts that will be affected by the new guidance. Under the modified retrospective method, the opening reserve balance at the transition date, January 1, 2019, would generally be the same as the closing balance before transition, updated for changes in the discount rate.

The Company expects that under either transition method, the impact to its reported financial statements under U.S. GAAP will be greatly influenced by the nature of the Company’s business model. Adoption of the new guidance under either method will reflect the Company’s concentration in Japan third-sector business, in particular cancer insurance, with respect to which the duration of liabilities is materially longer than asset durations. Depending on the transition method chosen upon adoption, the impact of a low discount rate applied to long-duration third sector liabilities is recognized at adoption, while associated favorable morbidity margins are recognized over time thus driving a pronounced timing impact to U.S. GAAP equity. In addition, with respect to the Japan segment, the Company maintains a large portfolio of assets designated as held-to-maturity (HTM) as a strategy to reduce capital (solvency margin ratio or SMR) volatility. In a low interest rate environment, such as presently exists in Japan, assets designated as HTM that were purchased in a higher interest rate environment have significant embedded gains not reflected in AOCI, which serves as an economic offset to a low discount rate applied to policy liabilities. At December 31, 2018, the Company’s HTM portfolio was $30.3 billion at amortized cost and had $6.5 billion in net unrealized gains. After adoption of the new guidance, the Company also expects net earnings and net earnings per share (which were $2.9 billion and $3.77 per diluted share, respectively, in 2018) to reflect larger quarterly fluctuations due to the new requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits.

As an example of the potential impact of the new guidance, and for illustrative purposes only, under the modified retrospective method and in a low interest rate environment, the Company would expect AOCI (which was $2.2 billion at December 31, 2018) to significantly decline upon adoption and to thereafter reflect larger quarterly fluctuations due to the new requirement to quarterly adjust discount rates. Conversely, in a higher interest rate environment, and again assuming adoption of the modified retrospective method for illustrative purposes, the Company would expect AOCI to decline less or even increase (depending on the specifics of the interest rate environment), as well as to reflect quarterly fluctuations. Under the full retrospective method, the Company would expect lesser declines or increases in total equity upon adoption

46



compared to the modified retrospective method due to the potential offsetting effect from updating experience and cash flow projections

The ultimate impact on these items from the Company’s implementation of the updated standard is subject to assessments that are dependent on many variables, including but not limited to (i) the transition method selected by the Company, which the Company continues to evaluate, (ii) how certain aspects of the new standard will be interpreted and implemented by the Company and other similar companies, such as (but not limited to) amortization of deferred acquisition costs, as well as establishment of policies, processes and controls for setting, monitoring and periodically updating reserve assumptions, and (iii) changes in the interest rate environment in the US and Japan.

The Company is in the early stages of reviewing transition methods and has only begun to assess the full impact of adoption; as such, the Company expects to provide periodic updates on its continuing assessment. However, the Company expects that while the adoption of this new accounting guidance will affect the Company’s financial statements under U.S. GAAP, it will not impact financial statements for Aflac Japan under FSA requirements or for Aflac U.S. under applicable statutory requirements. Therefore, the Company does not expect adoption of the updated standard to impact its subsidiaries’ dividend capacity or their ability to meet applicable regulatory capital standards, nor does the Company anticipate adoption to affect its strategies for capital deployment.

New Accounting Pronouncements

During the last three years, various accounting standard-setting bodies have been active in soliciting comments and issuing statements, interpretations and exposure drafts. For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on the Company's financial position or results of operations, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion includes references to the Company's performance measures, adjusted earnings, adjusted earnings per diluted share, and amortized hedge costs, which are not calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These measures exclude items that the Company believes may obscure the underlying fundamentals and trends in the Company's insurance operations because they tend to be driven by general economic conditions and events or related to infrequent activities not directly associated with its insurance operations. The Company's management uses adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share to evaluate the financial performance of its insurance operations on a consolidated basis, and the Company believes that a presentation of these measures is vitally important to an understanding of its underlying profitability drivers and trends of its insurance business. The Company believes that amortized hedge costs, which are a component of adjusted earnings, measure the periodic currency risk management costs associated with hedging a portion of Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments and are an important component of net investment income.

In 2018, the Company began utilizing the term “adjusted earnings” for the measure formerly referred to as "operating earnings" on both a pretax and after-tax basis, as well as an absolute and per-share basis. This change only pertained to the label of the measure and did not alter its definition or calculation.

Aflac defines adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as the profits derived from operations. The most comparative U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings. Adjusted earnings are adjusted revenues less benefits and adjusted expenses. The adjustments to both revenues and expenses account for certain items that cannot be predicted or that are outside management’s control. Adjusted revenues are U.S. GAAP total revenues excluding realized investment gains and losses, except for amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies. Adjusted expenses are U.S. GAAP total acquisition and operating expenses including the impact of interest cash flows from derivatives associated with notes payable but excluding any nonrecurring or other items not associated with the normal course of the Company’s insurance operations and that do not reflect Aflac’s underlying business performance.

The Company defines adjusted earnings per share (basic or diluted) to be adjusted earnings for the period divided by the weighted average outstanding shares (basic or diluted) for the period presented. The most comparable U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings per share.

Amortized hedge costs represent costs incurred in using foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the foreign exchange risk of a portion of U.S. dollar-denominated assets in the Company’s Japan segment investment portfolio. These amortized hedge costs are derived from the difference between the foreign currency spot rate at time of trade

47



inception and the contractual foreign currency forward rate, recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the hedge. There is no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for amortized hedge costs.

Because a significant portion of the Company's business is conducted in Japan and foreign exchange rates are outside of management’s control, the Company believes it is important to understand the impact of translating Japanese yen into U.S. dollars. Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior year period, which eliminates fluctuations driven solely by yen-to-dollar currency rate changes.

The following table is a reconciliation of items impacting adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures of net earnings and net earnings per diluted share, respectively, for the years ended December 31.
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Adjusted Earnings(1)
 In Millions Per Diluted Share
 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net earnings$2,920
 $4,604
 $2,659
 $3.77
 $5.77
 $3.21
Items impacting net earnings:           
Realized investment (gains) losses (2),(3),(4),(5)
297
 0
 (87) .38
 .00
 (.10)
Other and non-recurring (income) loss75
 69
 137
 .10
 .08
 .16
Income tax (benefit) expense on items
excluded from adjusted earnings
(83) (24) (18) (.11) (.03) (.02)
Tax reform adjustment (6)
18
 (1,933) 0
 .02
 (2.42) .00
Adjusted earnings3,226
 2,716
 2,691
 4.16
 3.40
 3.25
Current period foreign currency impact (7)
(28) N/A
 N/A
 (.04) N/A
 N/A
Adjusted earnings excluding current period
foreign currency impact
(8)
$3,198
 $2,716
 $2,691
 $4.13
 $3.40
 $3.25
(1) "Adjusted earnings" was formerly referred to as "operating earnings." Amounts may not foot due to rounding.
(2) Excludes amortized hedge costs of $236 in 2018, $228 in 2017 and $186 in 2016, related to hedging U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan which are classified as a component of adjusted earnings to conform to current year reporting. See "Hedge Costs" discussion below for further information.
(3) Amortized hedge costs in Aflac Japan were partially offset by derivatives entered into as part of corporate activities and resulted in a benefit of $36 in 2018, which has been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and reported as an increase in net investment income when analyzing operations.
(4) An immaterial amount of net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies in 2018 have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) into net investment income when analyzing operations.
(5) Excludes a gain of $67 in 2018, $77 in 2017 and $85 in 2016, related to the interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on notes payable which is classified as an operating gain when analyzing segment operations
(6) The impact of Tax Reform was estimated in 2017, and adjustments were recorded in 2018 for return-to-provision adjustments, various amended returns filed by the Company, and final true-ups of deferred tax liabilities.
(7) Prior period foreign currency impact reflected as “N/A” to isolate change for current period only.
(8) Amounts excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior-year period, which eliminates dollar-based fluctuations driven solely from currency rate changes.

Realized Investment Gains and Losses

The Company's investment strategy is to invest primarily in fixed maturity securities to provide a reliable stream of investment income, which is one of the drivers of the Company’s growth and profitability. This investment strategy incorporates asset-liability matching (ALM) to align the expected cash flows of the portfolio to the needs of the Company's liability structure. The Company does not purchase securities with the intent of generating capital gains or losses. However, investment gains and losses may be realized as a result of changes in the financial markets and the creditworthiness of specific issuers, tax planning strategies, and/or general portfolio management and rebalancing. The realization of investment gains and losses is independent of the underwriting and administration of the Company's insurance products. Realized investment gains and losses include securities transactions, impairments, changes in loan loss reserves, and derivative and foreign currency activities. Effective January 1, 2018, changes in fair value of equity securities are also included in earnings as a component of realized investment gains and losses.


48



Securities Transactions, Impairments, and Gains (Losses) on Equity Securities

Securities transactions include gains and losses from sales and redemptions of investments where the amount received is different from the amortized cost of the investment. Impairments include other-than-temporary-impairment losses on investment securities as well as changes in loan loss reserves for loan receivables. Starting in the first quarter of 2018, gains and losses from changes in fair value of equity securities are recorded in earnings.

Certain Derivative and Foreign Currency Gains (Losses)

The Company's derivative activities include foreign currency forwards and options on certain fixed maturity securities; foreign currency forwards and options that economically hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in yen and hedge the Company's long-term exposure to a weakening yen; foreign currency swaps associated with certain senior notes and subordinated debentures; foreign currency swaps and credit defaults swaps held in consolidated VIEs; interest rate swaps used to economically hedge interest rate fluctuations in certain variable-rate investments; and interest rate swaptions to hedge changes in the fair value associated with interest rate changes for certain dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities. Gains and losses are recognized as a result of valuing these derivatives, net of the effects of hedge accounting. The Company also excludes the accounting impacts of remeasurement associated with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate from adjusted earnings. Certain derivative and foreign currency gains (losses) exclude amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency exposure management strategies (see Hedge Cost section below), and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies and notes payable, all of which are included in adjusted earnings.

Hedge Costs

Effective January 1, 2017, adjusted earnings includes the impact of amortized hedge costs. Amortized hedge costs represent costs incurred in using foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the foreign exchange risk of a portion of U.S. dollar-denominated assets in the Company's Japan segment investment portfolio. Amortized hedge costs are offset by a hedge cost amortization benefit recognized for foreign currency forwards that economically hedge the Company's long-term exposure to a weakening yen. These amortized hedge costs are derived from the difference between the foreign currency spot rate at time of trade inception and the contractual foreign currency forward rate, recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the hedge. There is no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for amortized hedge costs.

Hedge costs can fluctuate based upon many factors, including the derivative notional amount, the length of time of the derivative contract, changes in both U.S. and Japan interest rates, and supply and demand for dollar funding. Hedge costs have increased in recent periods due to changes in the previously mentioned factors. In late 2017, the Company
took steps to mitigate rising hedge costs by increasing the amount of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments held
in Aflac Japan and to reduce hedge cost volatility by extending hedge duration. For additional information regarding
currency hedging, refer to Hedging Activities in the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A.

For additional information regarding realized investment gains and losses, including details of reported amounts for the periods presented, see Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other and Non-recurring Items

The United States insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. The system can result in periodic charges to the Company as a result of insolvencies/bankruptcies that occur with other companies in the life insurance industry. Some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. These charges neither relate to the ordinary course of the Company’s business nor reflect the Company’s underlying business performance, but result from external situations not controlled by the Company. Based on the underlying nature of these assessments in the United States, effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted a policy of excluding any charges associated with U.S. guaranty fund assessments and the corresponding tax benefit or expense from adjusted earnings.
For the Penn Treaty liquidation that was recognized by judicial authority in March 2017, the Company estimated and recognized a discounted liability for assessments of $62 million (undiscounted $94 million), offset by discounted premium tax credits of $48 million (undiscounted $74 million), for a net $14 million impact to net income in the quarter ended March 31, 2017. For additional information regarding guaranty fund assessments, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


49



In Japan, the government also requires the insurance industry to contribute to a policyholder protection corporation that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers; however, these costs are calculated and administered differently than in the United States. In Japan, these costs are not directly related to specific insolvencies or bankruptcies, but are rather a regular operational cost for an insurance company. Based on this structure, the Company does not remove the Japan policyholder protection expenses from adjusted earnings.
Effective January 1, 2017, nonrecurring items also include conversion costs related to legally converting the Company's Japan branch to a subsidiary; these costs primarily consist of expenditures for legal, accounting, consulting, integration of systems and processes and other similar services. These Japan branch conversion costs amounted to $75 million in 2018 and $42 million in 2017.

The Company considers the costs associated with the early redemption of its debt to be unrelated to the underlying fundamentals and trends in its insurance operations. Additionally, these costs are driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to the issuance of the debt, and the Company considers these interest rate changes to represent economic conditions not directly associated with its insurance operations. In November 2017, the Parent Company extinguished $500 million of its 5.50% subordinated debentures. The pretax non-operating expense due to the early redemption of these notes was $13 million. In 2016, the Parent Company completed a tender offer in which it extinguished $176 million principal of its 6.90% senior notes due 2039 and $193 million principal of its 6.45% senior notes due 2040. The pretax non-operating loss due to the early redemption of these notes was $137 million.

Tax Reform Adjustment

Among other changes, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the period of enactment, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recognized a non-recurring estimated $1.9 billion benefit for the reduction of the net deferred tax liability. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability.

For further information, see Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Taxes above in this MD&A, and Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Foreign Currency Translation
Aflac Japan’s premiums and a significant portion of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into dollars for financial reporting purposes. The Company translates Aflac Japan’s yen-denominated income statement into dollars using the average exchange rate for the reporting period, and the Company translates its yen-denominated balance sheet using the exchange rate at the end of the period.
Due to the size of Aflac Japan, whose functional currency is the Japanese yen, fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on the Company's reported results. In periods when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars results in fewer dollars being reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars results in more dollars being reported. Consequently, yen weakening has the effect of suppressing current period results in relation to the comparable prior period, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying current period results in relation to the comparable prior period. Management evaluates the Company's financial performance both including and excluding the impact of foreign currency translation to monitor, respectively, cumulative currency impacts on book value and the currency-neutral operating performance over time.
Income Taxes
The Company's combined U.S. and Japanese effective income tax rate on pretax earnings was 26.7% in 2018, (14.6)% in 2017 and 34.6% in 2016. The reduction in the tax rate for 2017 was primarily due to the $1.9 billion benefit as a result of the Tax Act. The decrease in the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 drove the reduction in the effective tax rate for 2018 compared with years prior to 2017. Total income taxes were $1.1 billion in 2018, compared with $(586) million in 2017 and $1.4 billion in 2016. Japanese income taxes on Aflac Japan's results account for most of the Company's consolidated income tax expense. For further information, see Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Taxes above in this MD&A, and Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


50



2019 Outlook

The Company’s strategy to drive long-term shareholder value is to pursue growth through product development, distribution expansion and digital advancements to improve the customer experience.

The Company's objectives in 2019 are to maintain strong pre-tax margins in its Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. segments through disciplined product pricing, stable investment returns and leveraging a period of favorable benefit ratios to invest in its platform for future growth and efficiency. The Company believes that its market-leading position, powerful brand recognition and diverse distribution in Japan and the United States will provide support toward these objectives.
The Company believes that its efforts will support its prudent strategies for capital deployment in the form of dividends, share repurchases, and opportunistic investments that enhance the Company’s business with a focus on digital distribution and leveraging the Company’s brand, distribution and scale. The Company has stated that the dividend payout ratio from its Aflac Japan segment is likely to be in the range of 80% - 100% of FSA earnings. In its Aflac U.S. segment, the Company plans to continue its RBC drawdown plan to an RBC in the 500% range by the end of 2019.

Aflac Japan Segment
In Japan, the Company anticipates that the shift in earned premium from first sector savings products to third sector cancer and medical products and first sector protection products, will continue to result in moderately lower benefit ratios in the Aflac Japan segment. The Company also expects this shift in business mix, plus continued investment in IT and digital advancements, to result in moderately higher expense ratios for Aflac Japan. The Company believes that the Japan segment will face revenue challenges in 2019 due to the run-off and paid-up status of first sector savings products. In addition, net investment income is expected to decline modestly as compared to 2018, due in part to the low rate environment in Japan, de-risking of the portfolio and rolling U.S. dollar hedge positions into higher cost contracts.

Aflac U.S. Segment
The Company expects the profit margins for the Aflac U.S. segment to remain strong, providing a prudent opportunity to reinvest profits back into the U.S. business. The Company believes that in 2019, benefit ratios in the U.S. will continue to trend favorably and that expense ratios will continue to be elevated in light of investments into U.S. platforms in both the individual and group channels. Net investment income is expected to decline modestly, primarily as the result of the Company’s U.S. capital and RBC draw-down plan.

Corporate Segment
The Company expects corporate segment results to benefit from net investment income driven by increased capital and liquidity held at the Parent Company, as well as the Company’s enterprise currency hedging strategy. The anticipated increase in investment income is expected to be partially offset by increased costs associated with continued investment in Aflac Corporate Ventures initiatives.

For important disclosures applicable to statements made in this 2019 Outlook, please see the Risk Factors section and the statement on “Forward-Looking Information” at the beginning of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

INSURANCE OPERATIONS
U.S. GAAP financial reporting requires that a company report financial and descriptive information about operating segments in its annual and interim period financial statements. Furthermore, the Company is required to report a measure of segment profit or loss, certain revenue and expense items, and segment assets. Aflac's insurance business consists of two segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. Aflac Japan is the principal contributor to consolidated earnings. Businesses that are not individually reportable, such as the Parent Company, and business activities, including reinsurance retrocession activities, not included in Aflac Japan or Aflac U.S. are included in the "Corporate and other" category. See the Item 1. Business section of this Form 10-K for a summary of each segment's products and distribution channels, and a discussion of the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary and the creation of asset management subsidiaries in 2018.

51



AFLAC JAPAN SEGMENT
Aflac Japan Pretax Adjusted Earnings

Changes in Aflac Japan's pretax adjusted earnings and profit margins are primarily affected by morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency and investment yields. The following table presents a summary of operating results for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.
Aflac Japan Summary of Operating Results
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Net premium income$12,762
 $12,752
 $13,537
Net investment income:     
Yen-denominated investment income1,283
 1,294
 1,346
U.S. dollar-denominated investment income1,356
 1,169
 1,208
Net investment income2,639
 2,463
 2,554
Amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency denominated investments236
 228
 186
Net investment income, less amortized hedge costs2,403
 2,235
 2,368
Other income (loss)41
 41
 40
Total adjusted revenues15,206
 15,028
 15,945
Benefits and claims, net8,913
 9,087
 9,828
Adjusted expenses:     
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs710
 630
 644
Insurance commissions735
 736
 787
Insurance and other expenses1,640
 1,521
 1,538
Total adjusted expenses3,085
 2,887
 2,969
Total benefits and expenses11,998
 11,974
 12,797
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
$3,208
 $3,054
 $3,148
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate110.39
 112.16
 108.70
  In Dollars In Yen
Percentage change over previous period:2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net premium income.1%
(5.8)% 12.4%
(1.5)% (2.7)% .8 %
Net investment income, less amortized
  hedge costs
7.5
 (5.6) .2
 5.5
 (2.0) (10.3)
Total adjusted revenues1.2
 (5.8) 10.4
 (.5) (2.5) (1.0)
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
5.0
 (3.0) 1.5
 3.1
 .6
 (9.0)
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.
In yen terms, Aflac Japan's net premium income decreased in 2018, with growth in third sector premium more than offset by an anticipated reduction in first sector premium due to savings products reaching premium paid-up status. Net investment income, net of amortized hedge costs, increased in 2018 largely due to higher income from U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate assets. Pretax adjusted earnings in yen increased, driven by higher net investment income and a favorable third sector benefit ratio.

Annualized premiums in force at December 31, 2018, were 1.53 trillion yen, compared with 1.55 trillion yen in 2017 and 1.61 trillion yen in 2016. The decrease in annualized premiums in force in yen of 1.6% in 2018 and 3.4% in 2017 was driven primarily by limited-pay policies becoming paid-up during the year. The decrease in annualized premiums in force in yen of .7% in 2016 reflects the net effect of sales of new policies combined with limited-pay policies becoming paid-up and the persistency of Aflac Japan’s business. Annualized premiums in force, translated into dollars at respective year-end exchange rates, were $13.8 billion in 2018, $13.7 billion in 2017, and $13.8 billion in 2016.


52



Aflac Japan's investment portfolios include U.S. dollar-denominated securities and reverse-dual currency securities (yen-denominated debt securities with dollar coupon payments). In years when the yen strengthens in relation to the dollar, translating Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investment income into yen lowers growth rates for net investment income, total adjusted revenues, and pretax adjusted earnings in yen terms. In years when the yen weakens, translating U.S. dollar-denominated investment income into yen magnifies growth rates for net investment income, total adjusted revenues, and pretax adjusted earnings in yen terms.

The following table illustrates the effect of translating Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investment income and related items into yen by comparing certain segment results with those that would have been reported had dollar/yen exchange rates remained unchanged from the prior year. Amounts excluding foreign currency impact on U.S. dollar denominated investment income were determined using the average dollar/yen exchange rate for the comparable prior year period.
Aflac Japan Percentage Changes Over Prior Year
(Yen Operating Results)
  Including Foreign
Currency Changes
 
Excluding Foreign
Currency Changes
(2)
  2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net investment income, less
amortized hedge costs
5.5 % (2.0)% (10.3)% 6.4 % (3.6)% (5.1)%
Total adjusted revenues(.5) (2.5) (1.0) (.3) (2.8) (.1)
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
3.1
 .6
 (9.0) 3.7
 (.5) (5.3)
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.
(2)Amounts excluding foreign currency impact on U.S. dollar-denominated investment income (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) were determined using the average dollar/yen exchange rate for the comparable prior year period.
The following table presents a summary of operating ratios in yen terms for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:2018 2017 2016 
Benefits and claims, net58.6% 60.4% 61.6% 
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs4.7
 4.2
 4.0
 
Insurance commissions4.8
 4.9
 4.9
 
Insurance and other expenses10.8
 10.1
 9.8
 
Total adjusted expenses20.3
 19.2
 18.7
 
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
21.1
 20.4
 19.7
 
Ratios to total premiums:      
Benefits and claims, net69.9% 71.3% 72.6% 
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs5.6
 4.9
 4.8
 
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.

In 2018, the benefit ratio decreased, compared to the prior year, primarily due to the continued change in mix of first and third sector business as first sector products become paid-up, as well as continued favorable third sector claims trends, and higher surrender rates for the cancer products. In 2018, the adjusted expense ratio increased due to lower premium income impacted by first sector products becoming paid-up, higher expenses primarily related to increased system development, outsourcing costs for new products, and DAC amortization due to the increase of surrender for cancer products. In total for 2018, the pretax adjusted profit margin increased, reflecting the decrease in the benefit ratio partially offset by a smaller increase in the expense ratio. For 2019, the Company anticipates the Aflac Japan pretax adjusted profit margin (calculated by dividing adjusted earnings by adjusted revenues) to remain stable.


53



Aflac Japan Sales

The following table presents Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales for the years ended December 31.
  In Dollars In Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
New annualized premium sales$869
 $846
 $1,045
 95.9
 94.9
 113.7
Increase (decrease) over prior period2.7% (19.0)% 4.8% 1.1% (16.6)% (5.9)%

The following table details the contributions to Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales by major insurance product for the years ended December 31.
 2018 2017 2016 
Cancer65.8%
55.8%
46.6%
Medical25.0
 34.1
 26.0
 
Income support1.8
 2.3
 0.0
 
Ordinary life:      
WAYS.5
 .6
 11.9
 
Child endowment.3
 .5
 6.4
 
Other ordinary life (1)
6.1
 6.0
 6.2
 
Other.5
 .7
 2.9
 
    Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
(1) Includes term and whole life

The foundation of Aflac Japan's product portfolio has been, and continues to be, third sector products, which include cancer, medical and Income Support insurance products. New annualized premium sales of third sector products on a yen basis increased 1.6% during 2018, compared with 2017. Third sector sales included growth in the new cancer insurance product that was launched in April 2018, however medical sales have declined compared with 2017 as a result of strong sales in 2017 driven by the introduction of the new medical insurance product in the second quarter of 2017. Aflac Japan has been focusing more on promotion of cancer and medical insurance products in this low-interest-rate environment. These products are less interest-rate sensitive and more profitable compared to first sector products. With continued cost pressure on Japan’s health care system, the Company expects the need for third sector products will continue to rise in the future and that the medical and cancer insurance products Aflac Japan provides will continue to be an important part of its product portfolio.

Independent corporate agencies and individual agencies contributed 40.1% of total new annualized premium sales for Aflac Japan in 2018, compared with 42.8% in 2017 and 46.7% in 2016. Affiliated corporate agencies, which include Japan Post, contributed 55.3% of total new annualized premium sales in 2018, compared with 52.0% in 2017 and 44.4% in 2016. Japan Post offers Aflac's cancer insurance products in more than 20,000 post offices. In 2018, Japan Post's sales of cancer insurance constituted approximately 25% of Aflac Japan's third sector sales. The Company believes this alliance with Japan Post has and will further benefit its cancer insurance sales. In 2018, Aflac Japan recruited 85 new sales agencies. At December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan was represented by more than 9,800 sales agencies, with more than 109,000 licensed sales associates employed by those agencies.
At December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had agreements to sell its products at 371 banks, approximately 90% of the total number of banks in Japan. Bank channel sales accounted for 4.6% of new annualized premium sales in 2018 for Aflac Japan, compared with 5.2% in 2017 and 8.9% in 2016.

Aflac Japan Investments

The level of investment income in yen is affected by available cash flow from operations, the timing of investing the cash flow, yields on new investments, the effect of yen/dollar exchange rates on U.S. dollar-denominated investment income, and other factors.

As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac Japan invests in yen and U.S. dollar-denominated investments. Yen-denominated investments primarily consist of JGBs and public and private fixed maturity securities. Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investments include fixed maturity investments and growth

54



assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships or similar investment vehicles. Aflac Japan has been investing in both publicly-traded and privately originated U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loan receivables, Aflac Japan has entered into foreign currency forwards and options to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of a portion of the U.S. dollar investments, interest rate swaptions to hedge interest rate fluctuations on some U.S. dollar investments, and interest rate swaps to economically hedge interest rate fluctuations in certain variable-rate investments.

The following table details the investment purchases for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.
(In millions) 2018 2017 
Yen-denominated:     
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Japan government and agencies $3,895
 $5,367
 
     Other fixed maturity securities 1,981
 1,579
 
  Equity securities 221
 189
 
        Total yen-denominated $6,097
 $7,135
 
      
U.S. dollar-denominated:     
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Other fixed maturity securities $1,299
 $466
 
     Infrastructure debt 0
 134
 
     Bank loans 346
 0
 
  Equity securities 120
 158
 
  Other investments:     
     Transitional real estate loans 3,168
 1,063
 
     Commercial mortgage loans 13
 48
 
     Middle market loans 839
 548
 
     Limited partnerships 314
 96
 
        Total dollar-denominated $6,099
 $2,513
 
            Total Aflac Japan purchases $12,196
 $9,648
 

Aflac Japan purchased $1.2 billion of yen-denominated private placements in 2018, compared with $1.1 billion in 2017.

See the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A for further discussion of these investment programs, and see Notes 1, 3 and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding loans and loan receivables.

Funds available for investment include cash flows from operations, investment income, and funds generated from maturities, redemptions, securities lending, and other securities transactions. Securities lending is also used from time to time to accelerate the availability of funds for investment. Purchases of securities from period to period are determined based on multiple objectives including appropriate portfolio diversification, the relative value of a potential investment and availability of investment opportunities, liquidity, credit and other risk factors while adhering to the Company's investment policy guidelines.

The following table presents the results of Aflac Japan's investment yields for the years ended and as of December 31.

55



 2018 2017 2016
Total purchases for the period (in millions) (1)
$11,882
 $9,552
 $10,903
New money yield (1),(2)
3.06% 1.98% 1.40%
Return on average invested assets (3)
2.33
 2.31
 2.47
Portfolio book yield, including U.S. dollar-denominated investments,
end of period
(1)
2.61% 2.56% 2.62%
(1)Includes fixed maturity securities, loan receivables, equity securities, and excludes alternative investments in limited partnerships
(2)Reported on a gross yield basis; excludes investment expenses, external management fees, and amortized hedge costs
(3)Net of investment expenses and amortized hedge costs, year-to-date number reflected on a quarterly average basis

The increase in the Aflac Japan new money yield in 2018 was primarily due to increased allocations to higher yielding U.S. dollar-denominated asset classes.

See Notes 3, 4 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Analysis of Financial Condition section of this MD&A for additional information on the Company's investments and hedging strategies.

AFLAC U.S. SEGMENT
Aflac U.S. Pretax Adjusted Earnings
Changes in Aflac U.S. pretax adjusted earnings and profit margins are primarily affected by morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency and investment yields. The following table presents a summary of operating results for Aflac U.S. for the years ended December 31.
Aflac U.S. Summary of Operating Results
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Net premium income$5,708
 $5,563
 $5,454
Net investment income727
 721
 703
Other income8
 5
 10
Total adjusted revenues6,443
 6,289
 6,167
Benefits and claims2,887
 2,885
 2,869
Adjusted expenses:     
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs534
 502
 497
Insurance commissions585
 580
 580
Insurance and other expenses1,152
 1,077
 1,013
Total adjusted expenses2,271
 2,159
 2,090
Total benefits and expenses5,158
 5,044
 4,959
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
$1,285
 $1,245
 $1,208
Percentage change over previous period:     
Net premium income2.6% 2.0% 2.0%
Net investment income.8
 2.6
 3.8
Total adjusted revenues2.4
 2.0
 2.2
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
3.2
 3.1
 9.7
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.

Net investment income increased in 2018, driven by higher income from floating rate assets partially offset from the drawdown of excess capital in the U.S. segment. Annualized premiums in force increased 3.0% in 2018, 2.6% in 2017 and 2.4% in 2016. Annualized premiums in force at December 31 were $6.2 billion in 2018, compared with $6.1 billion in 2017 and $5.9 billion in 2016.


56



The following table presents a summary of operating ratios for Aflac U.S. for the years ended December 31.
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:2018 2017 2016 
Benefits and claims44.8% 45.9%
46.5%
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs8.3
 8.0
 8.1
 
Insurance commissions9.1
 9.2
 9.4
 
Insurance and other expenses17.9
 17.1
 16.4
 
Total adjusted expenses35.2
 34.3
 33.9
 
Pretax adjusted earnings(1)
19.9
 19.8
 19.6
 
Ratios to total premiums:      
Benefits and claims50.6
 51.9
 52.6
 
Adjusted expenses:      
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs9.4
 9.0
 9.1
 
(1) Aflac defines pretax adjusted earnings (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure) as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of adjusted earnings and a reconciliation of adjusted earnings to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of net earnings.

The benefit ratio decreased in 2018, compared with 2017, due in large part to benefit reserve releases related to slightly elevated lapses of older individual cancer policies in the first and fourth quarters of 2018. The adjusted expense ratio increased slightly in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily due to planned spending increases reflecting elevated investments in the platform. The pretax adjusted profit margin increased slightly in 2018 when compared with 2017, primarily due to lower benefit ratios. In 2019, the Company expects benefit ratios to be slightly lower than 2018 levels, reflecting ongoing changes in business mix, and expects somewhat higher expense ratios reflecting further investments in its U.S. platform. Net investment income is expected to decline modestly, primarily the result of the Company’s U.S. capital and RBC drawdown plan. (Note that all of these ratios-to-revenue reflect reduced net investment income due to the Company's planned drawdown of excess capital to lower RBC ratios. See the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of this MD&A for further discussion of the planned reduction of RBC.)

Aflac U.S. Sales
The following table presents Aflac's U.S. new annualized premium sales for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
New annualized premium sales$1,601
 $1,552
 $1,482
 
Increase (decrease) over prior period3.2% 4.7% (.3)% 
The following table details the contributions to Aflac's U.S. new annualized premium sales by major insurance product category for the years ended December 31.
 2018 2017 2016 
Accident29.2% 29.4% 29.5% 
Short-term disability22.7
 22.9
 23.5
 
    Critical care (1)
22.1
 22.8
 22.1
 
Hospital indemnity15.8
 14.8
 14.8
 
Dental/vision4.7
 5.1
 5.0
 
Life5.5
 5.0
 5.1
 
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 
(1) Includes cancer, critical illness and hospital intensive care products

New annualized premium sales for accident insurance, the Aflac U.S. leading product category, increased 2.4%, short-term disability sales increased 1.8%, critical care insurance sales (including cancer insurance) decreased .1%, and hospital indemnity insurance sales increased 10.4% in 2018, compared with 2017.

57



The addition of group products has expanded Aflac U.S.'s reach and enabled Aflac U.S. to generate more sales opportunities with larger employers and through brokers and sales agent channels. The Company anticipates that the appeal of Aflac U.S. group products will continue to enhance opportunities to connect with larger businesses and their employees. The Aflac U.S. portfolio of group and individual products offers businesses the opportunity to give their employees a more valuable and comprehensive selection of benefit options.
In 2018, the Aflac U.S. sales forces included an average of more than 8,500 U.S. agents, including brokers, who were actively producing business on a weekly basis. The Company believes that this average weekly producer equivalent metric allows sales management to monitor progress and needs.

One Day PaySM is a claims initiative that Aflac U.S. has focused on to process, approve and pay eligible claims in just one day. The Company believes that this claims practice enhances the Aflac U.S. brand reputation and the trust policyholders have in Aflac, and it helps Aflac stand out from competitors.

Aflac U.S. products provide cash benefits that can be used to help with increasing out-of-pocket medical expenses, help cover household costs, or protect against income and asset loss. Group products and relationships with insurance brokers that handle the larger-case market are helping Aflac U.S. expand its reach by selling to larger businesses. Aflac U.S. is regularly evaluating the marketplace to identify opportunities to bring the most relevant, cost-effective products to customers. The Company believes the need for its products remains very strong, and Aflac U.S. continues to work on enhancing its distribution capabilities to access employers of all sizes, including initiatives that benefit the field force and the broker community. At the same time, the Company is seeking opportunities to leverage its brand strength and attractive product portfolio in the evolving health care environment.

U.S. Regulatory Environment

Healthcare Reform Legislation

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), federal health care legislation, was intended to give Americans of all ages and income levels access to comprehensive major medical health insurance and gave the U.S. federal government direct regulatory authority over the business of health insurance. While the ACA was enacted in 2010, the major elements of the law became effective on January 1, 2014. The ACA included major changes to the U.S. health care insurance marketplace. Among other changes, the ACA included an individual medical insurance coverage mandate (which has since been repealed effective 2019 by the Tax Act), provided for penalties on certain employers for failing to provide adequate coverage, created health insurance exchanges, and addressed coverage and exclusions as well as medical loss ratios. It also imposed an excise tax on certain high cost plans, known as the “Cadillac tax,” that is currently scheduled to begin in 2022. The ACA also included changes in government reimbursements and tax credits for individuals and employers and altered federal and state regulation of health insurers. The ACA, as enacted, does not require material changes in the design of the Company's insurance products. However, indirect consequences of the legislation and regulations could present challenges that could potentially have an impact on the Company's sales model, financial condition and results of operations. The United States Congress has considered and may continue to consider legislation that would repeal and replace key provisions of the ACA. There can be no assurance that any legislation affecting the ACA will be passed by Congress, nor as to the ultimate timing or provisions of any such legislation, nor as to the effect of any such legislation on the design or marketability of the Company's insurance products. Further, certain provisions of the ACA have been and may continue to be subject to challenge through litigation, the ultimate effects of which on the ACA are uncertain.

President Trump signed an Executive Order in October 2017 directing federal regulatory agencies to review and modify certain regulations issued under the ACA. The stated objectives of the Executive Order are to increase competition and consumer choices in health care markets, and to lower costs for health care, by making association health plans available to more employers, allowing employers to make better use of health reimbursement arrangements, and expanding coverage through short-term insurance. The Executive Order tasks three federal agencies, the Departments of Labor (DOL), Treasury, and Health and Human Services (HHS) with reviewing current rules and developing guidance to implement the order. While the details of any proposed modifications will not be known until further action by the agencies, the Company anticipates that the Executive Order will not have a significant impact on the availability or marketability of its products.


58



Tax Reform Legislation

The Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, effective January 1, 2018, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated or reduced certain deductions and credits and limited the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation.

The Tax Act also transitions international corporate taxation from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system, which in light of the current tax treatment of Aflac Japan as a branch has the effect of subjecting the earnings of Aflac Japan to Japan taxation and subjecting the Company's other earnings, including the consolidated earnings of the Parent Company, to U.S. taxation. The treatment of Aflac Japan as a branch for U.S. tax purposes did not change following the completion of its conversion from a branch structure to a subsidiary structure for legal purposes on April 1, 2018.

Aflac U.S. prices its business on an internal rate of return basis. The Aflac U.S. business has a financial structure that the Company expects to be neutral on a pricing basis from these tax changes. The Aflac U.S. products have high initial costs for marketing, underwriting and administration, which will have less tax relief under the changes and will increase the amount required to invest in new business. In addition, the Company expects that RBC requirements will increase on an after-tax basis, being another source of initial funding required for these products. The tax basis for reserves and DAC may also change the timing of tax payments in an accelerated or unfavorable direction. All of these effects will offset a favorable lower tax rate on income in later years. The overall impact is expected to be neutral on a pricing basis from these various effects.

The Tax Act changes became effective on January 1, 2018. However, because changes to tax rates are accounted for in the period of enactment, during the period ended December 31, 2017, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities and recorded a net deferred tax liability reduction of $1.9 billion as of that date. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an immaterial adjustment to the provisional Japan deferred tax balances and no valuation allowance adjustment related to anticipatory foreign tax credit asset, rendering final values for the Company's deferred tax liability.For information on the effects of the Tax Act during the period ended December 31, 2018, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this report. For information on the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary, see General Business under Item 1, Business, in this report.

Dodd-Frank Act

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations issued thereunder, in particular rules to require central clearing for certain types of derivatives, may have an impact on Aflac's derivative activity, including activity on behalf of Aflac Japan. In addition, in 2015 and 2016, six U.S. financial regulators, including the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), issued final rules regarding the exchange of initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) for uncleared swaps that impose greater obligations on swap dealers regarding uncleared swaps with certain counterparties, such as Aflac. The requirements of such rules with respect to VM, as well as similar regulations in Europe, became effective on March 1, 2017. Full compliance with respect to all counterparties was required by September 1, 2017. The requirements of such rules with respect to IM are currently being phased in and will be fully implemented by September 1, 2020. In October of 2017, the CFTC and the European Commission each finalized comparability determinations that permit certain swap dealers who are subject to both regulatory margin regimes to take advantage of substituted compliance by complying with one set of margin requirements. The margin requirements are expected to result in more stringent collateral requirements and to affect other aspects of Aflac's derivatives activity.

The Dodd-Frank Act also established a Federal Insurance Office (FIO) under the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and of lines of business other than certain health insurance, certain long-term care insurance and crop insurance. Traditionally, U.S. insurance companies have been regulated primarily by state insurance departments. The FIO does not directly regulate the insurance industry, but under Dodd-Frank it has the power to preempt state insurance regulations that are inconsistent with international agreements reached by the federal government, subject to certain requirements and restrictions. The FIO and certain federal agencies must achieve consensus positions with the state insurance regulators when taking positions on insurance proposals by certain international forums. In December 2013, the FIO released a report entitled "How To Modernize And Improve The System Of Insurance Regulation In The United States." The report was required by the Dodd-Frank Act, and included 18 recommended areas of near-term reform for the states, including addressing capital adequacy and safety/soundness issues, reform of insurer resolution practices, and reform of marketplace regulation. The report also listed nine recommended areas for direct federal involvement in insurance regulation. Some of the recommendations outlined in the FIO report released in December 2013 have been implemented. The National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers Reform Act, signed into law in January 2015, simplifies the agent and broker licensing process across state lines. The FIO has also engaged with the supervisory colleges to monitor financial stability and identify regulatory gaps for large national and internationally active

59



insurers. The President and Congress have stated proposals to reform or repeal certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, some of which have been implemented. The Company cannot predict with any degree of certainty what impact, if any, such proposals will have on Aflac's business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Insurance Guaranty Laws

Under state insurance guaranty association laws and similar laws in international jurisdictions, Aflac is subject to assessments, based on the share of business it writes in the relevant jurisdiction, for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants. In the United States, some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. The Company's policy is to accrue assessments when the entity for which the insolvency relates has met its state of domicile's statutory definition of insolvency, the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable and the related premium upon which the assessment is based is written. In most states, the definition is met with a declaration of financial insolvency by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Aflac U.S. Investments

The level of investment income is affected by available cash flow from operations, the timing of investing the cash flow, yields on new investments, and other factors.

As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac U.S. invests in fixed maturity investments and growth assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships. Aflac U.S. has been investing in both publicly traded and privately originated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loan receivables.

The following table details the investment purchases for Aflac U.S. as of December 31.
(In millions) 2018 2017 
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Other fixed maturity securities $1,068
 $836
 
     Infrastructure debt 97
 60
 
  Equity securities 76
 56
 
  Other investments:     
     Transitional real estate loans 610
 249
 
     Commercial mortgage loans 163
 34
 
     Middle market loans 141
 199
 
     Limited partnerships 44
 16
 
        Total Aflac U.S. Purchases $2,199
 $1,450
 

Funds available for investment include cash flows from operations, investment income, and funds generated from maturities, redemptions, and other securities transactions. Purchases of securities from period to period are determined based on multiple objectives, including appropriate portfolio diversification, the relative value of a potential investment and availability of investment opportunities, liquidity, credit and other risk factors while adhering to the Company's investment policy guidelines.

The following table presents the results of Aflac's U.S. investment yields for the years ended and as of December 31.
 2018 2017 2016 
Total purchases for period (in millions) (1)
$2,155
 $1,434
 $1,144
 
New money yield (1), (2)
4.55% 4.49% 3.89% 
Return on average invested assets (3)
5.16
 5.07
 5.04
 
Portfolio book yield, end of period (1)
5.55% 5.52% 5.60% 
(1) Includes fixed maturity securities, loan receivables, equity securities, and excludes alternative investments in limited partnerships
(2) Reported on a gross yield basis; excludes investment expenses and external management fees
(3)Net of investment expenses, year-to-date number reflected on a quarterly average basis


60



The increase in the Aflac U.S. new money yield in 2018 was primarily due to increased allocations to higher yielding floating rate assets.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Credit Risk subsection of MD&A for more information regarding the sector concentrations of the Company's investments.

CORPORATE AND OTHER

Total revenue for corporate and other increased to $339 million in 2018, compared with $272 million in 2017 and $277 million in 2016. This increase in 2018 was primarily driven by an increase in net investment income. The increase in net investment income to $113 million in 2018, compared with $35 million in 2017, was driven by a $36 million pretax contribution from the Company’s corporate yen hedging program and increased income from over $600 million of invested assets transferred as part of the drawdown of excess capital in the U.S. segment beginning in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Corporate adjusted expenses consist primarily of personnel compensation, benefits, reinsurance retrocession benefits expense, and facilities expenses. Corporate expenses were $478 million in 2018, compared with $486 million in 2017, and $516 million in 2016. The decline in adjusted expenses in 2018 was considered insignificant. The decline in adjusted expenses from 2016 to 2017 was driven in large part by fluctuations in retrocession activity, which results in corresponding declines in total premiums.

Pretax adjusted earnings for corporate and other were a loss of $139 million in 2018, compared with a loss of $214 million in 2017 and a loss of $239 million in 2016. The improvement in pretax adjusted earnings in 2018 was driven primarily by the increase in net investment income as previously described.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Company's financial condition has remained strong in the functional currencies of its operations. The yen/dollar exchange rate at the end of each period is used to translate yen-denominated balance sheet items to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes.
Investments

The Company’s investment strategy utilizes disciplined asset and liability management while seeking long-term risk-adjusted investment returns and the delivery of stable income within regulatory and capital objectives, and preserving shareholder value. In attempting to optimally balance these objectives, the Company seeks to maintain on behalf of Aflac Japan a diversified portfolio of yen-denominated investment assets, U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio hedged back to yen and a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated assets. As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac U.S. invests in fixed maturity investments and growth assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships. Aflac U.S. invests in both publicly traded and privately originated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loans.


61



The following table details investments by segment as of December 31.
Investment Securities by Segment
  Aflac Japan Aflac U.S. 
(In millions)2018 2017 2018 2017 
Available for sale, fixed maturity securities,
at fair value
(1)
$69,409
 $69,338
 $12,132
 $13,606

Held to maturity, fixed maturity securities,
at amortized cost
30,318
 31,430
 0
 0
 
Equity securities (1)
806
 868
 137
 92
 
Other investments:        
Transitional real estate loans3,621
 986
 756
 249
 
Commercial mortgage loans763
 767
 301
 141
 
Middle market loans1,144
 527
 334
 332
 
Policy loans219
 198
 13
 12
 
Short-term investments0
 57
 141
 0
 
Other333
 98
 63
 31
 
Total other investments6,080
 2,633
 1,608
 765
 
     Total investments106,613
 104,269
 13,877
 14,463
 
Cash and cash equivalents1,779
 636
 641
 1,011
 
              Total investments and cash (2)
$108,392
 $104,905
 $14,518
 $15,474
 
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2)Excludes investments and cash held by the Parent Company and other business segments of $3,333 in 2018 and $3,280 in 2017.

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $4.3 billion, or 3.4% of total investments and cash, as of December 31, 2018, compared with $3.5 billion, or 2.8%, at December 31, 2017. For a discussion of the factors affecting the Company's cash balance, see the Operating Activities, Investing Activities and Financing Activities subsections of this MD&A.

In 2017, Aflac U.S. became a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB). As a member, Aflac U.S. can access low-cost funding and also receive dividends on FHLB membership stock. Additional FHLB stock purchases are required based on funding activity with the FHLB. Aflac U.S. will be required to post acceptable forms of collateral for any funding from the FHLB. The FHLB stock purchased by the Company is classified as a restricted investment and is included in "other investments" in the consolidated balance sheets.

For additional information concerning the Company's investments, see Notes 3, 4, and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The ratings of the Company's securities referenced in the table below are based on the ratings designations provided by major Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs) (Moody's, S&P and Fitch) or, if not rated, are determined based on the Company's internal analysis of such securities. When the ratings issued by the rating agencies differ, the Company utilizes the second lowest rating when three or more rating agency ratings are available or the lowest rating when only two rating agency ratings are available.


62



The distributions of debt securities the Company owns, by credit rating, as of December 31 were as follows:
Composition of Securities Portfolio by Credit Rating
   2018   2017 
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
AAA 1.0%   .9%   1.0%   .9% 
AA 3.9
   4.0
   3.9
   4.0
 
A 67.9
   69.9
   65.8
   66.9
 
BBB 23.2
   21.6
   24.0
   23.3
 
BB or lower 4.0
   3.6
   5.3
   4.9
 
Total 100.0%   100.0%   100.0%   100.0% 

As of December 31, 2018, the Company's direct and indirect exposure to securities in its investment portfolio that were guaranteed by third parties was immaterial both individually and in the aggregate.

The following table presents the 10 largest unrealized loss positions in the Company's portfolio as of December 31, 2018.
(In millions)Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized    
Loss    
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. B   $143
   $75
   $(68) 
AXA BBB   293
   242
   (51) 
Autostrade Per Litalia Spa BBB   180
   150
   (30) 
Baker Hughes Inc. A   122
   94
   (28) 
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse (KLP) BBB   135
   113
   (22) 
Abbvie Inc. BBB   177
   156
   (21) 
Transocean Inc. CCC   72
   52
   (20) 
Commonwealth Bank of Australia BBB   185
   166
   (19) 
Time Warner Cable Inc. AA   118
   99
   (19) 
United Technologies Corporation BBB   209
   192
   (17) 

Generally, declines in fair values can be a result of changes in interest rates, yen/dollar exchange rate, and changes in net spreads driven by a broad market move or a change in the issuer's underlying credit quality. As the Company believes these issues have the ability to continue making timely payments of principal and interest, the Company views these changes in fair value to be temporary and does not believe it is necessary to impair the carrying value of these securities. See the Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses section in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions of unrealized losses related to financial institutions and other corporate investments.
Below-Investment-Grade
The Company's portfolio of below-investment-grade securities includes debt securities purchased while the issuer was rated investment grade plus other loans and bonds purchased as part of an allocation to that segment of the market. The following is the Company's below-investment-grade exposure.


63



Below-Investment-Grade Investments
  December 31, 2018 
(In millions)
Par
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Gain
(Loss)
 
Investcorp Capital Limited$383
 $383
 $372
 $(11) 
Republic of South Africa360
 360
 372
 12
 
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines270
 199
 224
 25
 
Navient Corp.210
 114
 119
 5
 
Republic of Tunisia189
 111
 127
 16
 
Telecom Italia SpA180
 180
 208
 28
 
Barclays Bank PLC180
 111
 147
 36
 
Transnet135
 135
 135
 0
 
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc.124
 143
 75
 (68) 
IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG117
 50
 94
 44
 
Arconic Inc.100
 84
 92
 8
 
Noble Holdings International Ltd.92
 57
 57
 0
 
EMC Corp.80
 80
 68
 (12) 
Generalitat de Catalunya72
 26
 64
 38
 
Teck Resources Ltd.70
 76
 67
 (9) 
Teva Pharmaceuticals68
 66
 58
 (8) 
Transocean Inc.68
 72
 52
 (20) 
Petrobras International Finance Company65
 65
 63
 (2) 
National Gas Co. Trinidad and Tobago52
 50
 50
 0
 
CF Industries Inc.50
 49
 47
 (2) 
Other Issuers (below $50 million in par value)232
 222
 214
 (8) 
          Subtotal (1)
3,097
 2,633
 2,705
 72
 
Senior secured bank loans1,093
 1,108
 1,061
 (47) 
High yield corporate bonds519
 513
 487
 (26) 
Middle market loans, net of reserves (2)
1,497
 1,478
 1,475
 (3) 
          Grand Total$6,206
 $5,732
 $5,728
 $(4) 
(1) Securities initially purchased as investment grade, but have subsequently been downgraded to below investment grade
(2) Middle market loans are carried at amortized cost

The Company invests in senior secured bank loans and middle market loans primarily to U.S. corporate borrowers, most of which have below-investment-grade ratings. The objectives of these programs include enhancing the yield on invested assets, achieving further diversification of credit risk, and mitigating the risk of rising interest rates and hedge costs through the acquisition of floating rate assets.

The Company maintains an allocation to higher yielding corporate bonds within the Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. portfolios. Most of these securities were rated below-investment-grade at the time of purchase, but the Company also purchased several that were rated investment grade which, because of market pricing, offer yields commensurate with below-investment-grade risk profiles. The objective of this allocation was to enhance the Company's yield on invested assets and further diversify credit risk. All investments must have a minimum rating of low BB using the Company's above described rating methodology and are managed by the Company's internal credit portfolio management team.

In January 2019, PG&E Corporation (PG&E) and its operating subsidiary, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E Utility) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Northern District of California. At December 31, 2018, debt of the PG&E utility was rated investment grade and the Company's net exposure was $126 million (amortized cost), all of which was issued by PG&E utility. Subsequently, the rating on this exposure migrated to below investment grade.


64



Oil and Gas Exposure

The following tables show the breakout of our exposure to the oil and gas industry as of December 31.

 2018 
 Cost or Gross Gross    
 Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
(In millions)Cost Gains Losses Value
Securities available for sale,
  carried at fair value:
               
   Fixed maturities:               
         Independent exploration and production $813
   $72
   $36
   $849
 
         Integrated energy 426
   19
   30
   415
 
         Midstream 1,059
   91
   38
   1,112
 
         Oil field services 725
   9
   154
   580
 
         Refiners 346
   4
   20
   330
 
         Government owned - energy related 855
   167
   6
   1,016
 
         Natural gas utilities 472
   49
   6
   515
 
            Total securities available for sale 4,696
   411
   290
   4,817
 
Securities held to maturity,
  carried at amortized cost:
               
   Fixed maturities:               
         Integrated energy 234
   5
   0
   239
 
         Government owned - energy related 270
   0
   8
   262
 
         Natural gas utilities 360
   34
   0
   394
 
            Total securities held to maturity 864
   39
   8
   895
 
Equity Securities:               
         Independent exploration and production 2
   0
   0
   2
 
         Integrated energy 8
   0
   0
   8
 
         Oil field services 1
   0
   0
   1
 
         Refiners 4
   0
   0
   4
 
            Total equity securities 15
   0
   0
   15
 
                Total securities $5,575
   $450
   $298
   $5,727
 

Securities by Type of Issuance
The Company has investments in both publicly and privately issued securities. The Company's ability to sell either type of security is a function of overall market liquidity which is impacted by, among other things, the amount of outstanding securities of a particular issuer or issuance, trading history of the issue or issuer, overall market conditions, and idiosyncratic events affecting the specific issue or issuer.

The following table details investment securities by type of issuance as of December 31.

65




Investment Securities by Type of Issuance
   2018   2017 
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair   
Value   
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair  
Value  
Publicly issued securities:               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 $83,482
   $93,255
   $81,454
   $93,025
 
Equity securities (1)
 936
   936
   831
   1,006
 
      Total publicly issued 84,418
   94,191
   82,285
   94,031
 
Privately issued securities: (2)
               
Fixed maturity securities (1)
 23,692
   26,362
   25,108
   29,360
 
Equity securities (1)
 51
   51
   15
   17
 
      Total privately issued 23,743
   26,413
   25,123
   29,377
 
      Total investment securities $108,161
   $120,604
   $107,408
   $123,408
 
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2) Includes Rule 144A securities

The Company held $1,202 million and $1,789 million of perpetual securities at fair value ($1,201 million and $1,462 million at amortized cost) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The perpetual securities the Company holds were largely issued by banks that are systemically important to the financial markets of the sovereign country of domicile of the issuer. Generally, the Company believes regulatory changes made in the banking industry following the Global Financial Crisis and the European Sovereign Crisis, including increased capital and liquidity requirements and a reduction of business risk, have improved overall bank creditworthiness. However, bank capital securities may be subject to varying bail-in/resolution regimes in their home countries, which may include conversion or write-down provisions when bank regulators determine that the institution has reached the point of non-viability. Such actions could result in lower cash flows and ratings downgrades of the affected securities, which in turn could result in a reduction of fair value of the securities and increase the Company’s regulatory capital requirements. These factors are an integral part of the Company's credit review process.

The following table details the Company's privately issued investment securities as of December 31.
Privately Issued Securities
(Amortized cost, in millions)2018 2017 
Privately issued securities as a percentage of total investment securities22.0% 23.4% 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan$20,966
 $22,354
 
Privately issued securities held by Aflac Japan as a percentage of total
investment securities
19.4% 20.8% 
Reverse-Dual Currency Securities(1)
(Amortized cost, in millions)2018 2017 
Privately issued reverse-dual currency securities$5,120
 $5,669
 
Publicly issued collateral structured as reverse-dual currency securities1,657
 1,390
 
Total reverse-dual currency securities$6,777
 $7,059
 
Reverse-dual currency securities as a percentage of total investment
securities
6.3% 6.6% 
(1)Principal payments in yen and interest payments in dollars

Aflac Japan has a portfolio of privately issued securities to better match liability characteristics and secure higher yields than those available on Japanese government or other public corporate bonds.Aflac Japan’s investments in yen-denominated privately issued securities consist primarily of non-Japanese issuers, are rated investment grade at purchase and have longer maturities, thereby allowing the Company to improve asset/liability matching and overall investment returns. These securities are generally either privately negotiated arrangements or issued under medium-term note programs and have standard documentation commensurate with credit ratings of the issuer, except when internal credit analysis indicates that additional protective and/or event-risk covenants were required. Many of these investments

66



have protective covenants appropriate to the specific investment. These may include a prohibition of certain activities by the borrower, maintenance of certain financial measures, and specific conditions impacting the payment of the Company's notes.

Hedging Activities

The Company uses derivative contracts to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. Derivative hedges are designed to reduce risk on an economic basis while minimizing the impact on financial results. The Company’s derivative hedge programs vary depending on the type of risk being hedged.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Hedge Program
The Company has deployed the following hedging strategies to mitigate exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk:
1.
Aflac Japan hedges U.S. dollar-denominated investments back to yen (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
2.
Aflac Japan maintains certain unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, which serve as an economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).
3.
The Parent Company designates yen-denominated liabilities (notes payable and loans) as non-derivative hedging instruments and designates certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedges of the Company’s net investment in Aflac Japan (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).
4.
The Parent Company enters into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency exchange rate risk related to dividend payments by its subsidiary, Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. (see Parent Company’s Foreign Currency Hedge Program below).

Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program
Aflac Japan buys U.S. dollar-denominated investments, typically corporate bonds, and hedges them back to yen with foreign currency forwards and options to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk. This economically creates yen assets that match yen liabilities during the life of the derivative and provides liquidity and capital relief. The currency risk being hedged is generally based on fair value of hedged investments. The following table summarizes the U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan as of December 31.
 2018 2017
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale securities:     
  Fixed maturity securities (excluding bank loans) (1)
$17,101
$17,003
 $17,972
$19,314
  Fixed maturity securities - bank loans (floating rate)1,296
1,238
 1,936
1,865
  Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
Equity securities (1), (2)
177
177
 147
173
Other investments:     
  Transitional real estate loans (floating rate)3,621
3,625
 986
984
  Commercial mortgage loans763
736
 767
753
  Middle market loans (floating rate)1,144
1,146
 527
530
  Alternative investments333
333
 97
97
      Total U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan$26,114
$26,527
 $24,082
$26,265
(1) Includes perpetual securities
(2) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. for the adoption of accounting guidance related to financial instruments effective January 1, 2018.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and $9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the U.S. dollar-denominated investments. The fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

67




Foreign exchange derivatives used for hedging are periodically settled, which results in cash receipt or payment at maturity or early termination. The Company had net cash settlements of $272 million, $(747) million and $1.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, associated with the currency derivatives used for hedging Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments.

The following table presents metrics related to Aflac Japan hedge costs as of December 31.

Aflac Japan Hedge Cost Metrics(1)
 2018 2017 2016
FX forward notional at end of period (in billions of dollars)(2)
9.9 9.3 11.8
Weighted average original tenor (in months)(3)
30.4 33.1 20.6
Weighted average remaining tenor (in months)(4)
21.4 27.7 18.5
Annualized amortized hedge costs (in basis points)(5)
241 211 149
Amortized hedge costs for period (in millions of dollars)(236) (228) (186)
(1) See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of amortized hedge costs.
(2) Notional is reported net of any offsetting positions
(3) Tenor based on derivative's original execution date to settlement date
(4) Tenor based on period reporting date to settlement date
(5) Based on annualized amortized hedge costs divided by average FX forward notional for the period

Parent Company's Foreign Currency Hedge Program

The Company has designated certain yen-denominated liabilities and foreign currency forwards and options of the Parent Company as accounting hedges of its net investment in Aflac Japan. The Company's consolidated yen-denominated net asset position was partially hedged at $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2018, with hedging instruments comprised completely of yen-denominated debt, compared with a hedge of $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2017, with hedging instruments comprised of $1.4 billion of yen-denominated debt and $.4 billion of foreign currency forwards and options.

The Company makes its accounting designation of net investment hedge at the beginning of each quarter. If the total of the designated Parent Company non-derivative and derivative notional is equal to or less than the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective, and the currency exchange effect on the yen-denominated liabilities and the change in estimated fair value of the derivatives are reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. The Company's net investment hedge was effective during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In order to economically mitigate risks associated with the enterprise-wide exposure to the yen and the level and volatility of hedge costs, the Parent Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts. By buying U.S. dollars and selling yen, the Parent Company is effectively lowering its overall economic exposure to the yen, while Aflac Japan's U.S dollar exposure remains reduced as a result of Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated hedge program that synthetically creates yen assets. Among other objectives, this strategy is intended to reduce the enterprise-wide hedge costs. In 2018, the portion of the enterprise-wide hedge costs reduction contributed by this strategy was $36 million. This activity is reported in the Corporate and other segment. As this program evolves, the Company will continue to evaluate the program’s efficacy, including third-party review.

Interest Rate Risk Hedge Program

To mitigate the risk of investment income volatility, the Company economically hedges interest rate fluctuations for certain variable-rate investments. To manage interest rate risk associated with its U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan, the Company also utilizes interest rate swaptions.

For additional discussion of the risks associated with the foreign currency exposure refer to the Currency Risk section in Item 1A, specifically to the Risk Factors titled “The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate“ and “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity." For discussion of the Company’s view on the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan, refer to the Investments subsection within Item 1, Business.


68



See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's hedging activities.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The following table presents deferred policy acquisition costs by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2015 2014 % Change     2018 2017 % Change     
Aflac Japan$5,370
 $5,211
 3.1%
(1) 
$6,384
 $6,150
 3.8%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.3,141
 3,062
 2.6
 3,491
 3,355
 4.1
 
Total$8,511
 $8,273
 2.9% $9,875
 $9,505
 3.9% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s deferred policy acquisition costs increased 3.1%2.0% in yen during the year ended December 31, 20152018.


See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on ourthe Company's deferred policy acquisition costs.


Policy Liabilities
The following table presents policy liabilities by segment for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2015 2014 % Change       2018 2017 % Change       
Aflac Japan$78,460
 $74,575
 5.2 %
(1) 
$92,791
 $89,132
 4.1%
(1) 
Aflac U.S.9,815
 9,356
 4.9
 10,981
 10,625
 3.4
 
Other43
 2
 100.0
 183
 138
 32.6
 
Intercompany eliminations (2)
(687) 0
 (100.0) (767) (748) 2.5
 
Total$87,631
 $83,933
 4.4 % $103,188
 $99,147
 4.1% 
(1) Aflac Japan’s policy liabilities increased 5.3%2.3% in yen during the year ended December 31, 20152018.
(2) Elimination entry necessary due to recapture of a portion of policy liabilities ceded externally, as a result of the reinsurance retrocession transaction as described in Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on ourthe Company's policy liabilities.


Notes Payable
Notes payable totaled $5.0$5.8 billion at December 31, 2015,2018, compared with $5.3 billion at December 31, 2014.2017.


In August 2015, we paid off $300 million of 3.45% fixed-rate senior notes upon their maturity and paid off a 5.0 billion yen loan at its maturity date (a total of approximately $41 million using the exchange rate at the specific maturity date). In July 2015, we paid off a 10.0 billion yen loan at its maturity date (a total of approximately $81 million using the exchange rate at the specific maturity date).

In March 2015,October 2018, the Parent Company issued two series$550 million of senior notes totaling $1.0 billion through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled $550 million,29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.40%1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a five-year12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled $450 million,15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.25%1.488% per annum, payable semiannually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a ten-year20-year maturity. We have entered into cross-currency swaps that convertThese notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest ontaxation, as specified in the senior notes into yen-denominated obligations which results in lower nominal net interest rates onindenture governing the debt. By entering into these cross-currency swaps, we economically converted our $550 million liability into a 67.0 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 2.40% in dollars to .24% in yen, and we economically converted our $450 million liability into a 55.0 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 3.25% in dollars to .82% in yen. In April 2015, the Parent Company used the proceeds from the March 2015 issuance of its fixed-rate senior notes to redeem all of our $850 million 8.50% fixed-rate senior notes

72



due May 2019 and to pay a portionterms of the corresponding $230 million make-whole premium due to the investors of these notes.issuance.


See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on ourthe Company's notes payable.



69


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Benefit Plans
Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. have various benefit plans. For additional information on ourthe Company's Japanese and U.S. plans, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Policyholder Protection
Policyholder Protection Corporation

The Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. Legislation enacted regarding the framework of the Life Insurance Policyholder Protection Corporation (LIPPC) included government fiscal measures supporting the LIPPC. On December 27, 2011, Japan's FSA announcedMarch 30, 2012, the plansDiet approved legislation to enhance the stability of the LIPPC by extending the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2017. Accordingly, the FSA submittedOn November 25, 2016, Japan's Diet passed legislation to the Diet on January 27, 2012 to extendthat again extends the government's fiscal support framework, andof the legislation was approved onLIPPC through March 30, 2012.2022. Effective April 2014, the annual LIPPC contribution amount for the total life industry was lowered from 40 billion yen to 33 billion yen. Aflac Japan paid 2.2 billion yen in both 2015

Guaranty Fund Assessments

Under U.S. state guaranty association laws, certain insurance companies can be assessed (up to prescribed limits) for certain obligations to the policyholders and 2014 and 2.3 billion yen in 2013 forclaimants of impaired or insolvent insurance companies that write the policyholder protection fund.

Hedging Activities

Net Investment Hedge

Our primary exposure to be hedged is our investment in Aflac Japan, which is affected by changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate. To mitigate this exposure, we have taken the following coursessame line or similar lines of action. First, Aflac Japan maintains certain unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, which serve as an economic currency hedge of a portion of our investment in Aflac Japan. Second, we have designated the majoritybusiness. The amount of the Parent Company’s yen-denominated liabilities (Samurai and Uridashi notes) as non-derivative hedging instruments and certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedgesguaranty fund assessment that an insurer is assessed is based on its proportionate share of our net investment in Aflac Japan. We make our net investment hedge designation at the beginning of each quarter. If the total of the designated Parent Company non-derivative and derivatives notional is equal to or less than our net investment in Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective, and the exchange effect on the yen-denominated liabilities and the change in estimated fair value of the derivatives are reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. We estimate that if the designated net investment hedge positions exceeded our net investment in Aflac Japan by 10 billion yen, we would report a foreign exchange gain/loss of approximately $1 million for every 1% yen weakening/strengthening in the end-of-period yen/dollar exchange rate. Our net investment hedge was effective during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
The yen net asset figure calculated for hedging purposes differs from the yen-denominated net asset position as discussed in the Currency Risk subsection of MD&A. As disclosedpremiums in that subsection, the consolidation of the underlying assets in certain VIEs requires that we derecognize our yen-denominated investment in the VIE and recognize the underlying fixed-maturity or perpetual securities and cross-currency swaps. While these U.S. dollar investments will create foreign currency fluctuations, the combination of the U.S. dollar-denominated investment and the cross-currency swap economically creates a yen-denominated investment that qualifies for inclusion as a component of our investment in Aflac Japan. Similarly, the combination of the U.S. corporate bonds and the foreign currency forwards and options that we have entered into, as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A, economically creates a yen-denominated investment that qualifies for inclusion as a component of our investment in Aflac Japan.state.


The dollar values of our yen-denominated net assets, including economic yen-denominated investments for net investment hedging purposes as discussed above, are summarized as follows (translated at end-of-period exchange rates) for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)2015 2014
Aflac Japan net assets $13,558
   $14,665
 
Aflac Japan unhedged dollar-denominated net assets (8,111)   (8,672) 
   Consolidated yen-denominated net assets (liabilities) $5,447
   $5,993
 


73



For the hedge of our net investment in Aflac Japan, we have designated certain of the Parent Company's yen-denominated liabilities, certain unhedged U.S. dollar investments and foreign currency forwards and options as a hedge of our net investment in Aflac Japan. Our consolidated yen-denominated net asset position was partially hedged at $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2015, compared with $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2014.
Cash Flow Hedges

We had freestanding derivative instruments related to our consolidated VIE investments that are reported in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value within other assets and other liabilities. As of December 31, 2015, two2018, the Company has estimated and recognized the impact of its share of guaranty fund assessments resulting from the freestanding swaps that are used within VIEs to hedge the risk arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates qualified for hedge accounting.

Fair Value Hedges

We have entered into foreign currency forwards and options to mitigate the foreign exchange risk associated with new investments in U.S. dollar-denominated fixed-maturities that support yen-denominated liabilities within our Aflac Japan segment.

At times we have entered into interest rate swaptions to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with our U.S. dollar-denominated fixed-maturities that support yen-denominated liabilities within our Aflac Japan segment.

liquidation of a long-term care insurer. See Note 415 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additionalfurther information on our hedging activities.the assessment.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


As of December 31, 2015, we2018, the Company had no material letters of credit, standby letters of credit, guarantees or standby repurchase obligations. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on material unconditional purchase obligations that are not recorded on ourthe Company's balance sheet.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Aflac providesJapan and Aflac U.S. provide the primary sources of liquidity to the Parent Company through dividends and management fees. The following table presents the amounts provided for the years ended December 31.
Liquidity Provided by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. to Parent Company
(In millions)2015 2014 2013 
Dividends declared or paid by Aflac$2,393
 $1,473
 $962
 
Management fees paid by Aflac255
 267
 292
 
(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Dividends declared or paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.$1,817

$2,590
(1) 
$2,000
 
Management fees paid by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S.204
 291
 260
 

(1) Includes securities of $622 at fair value which had a value of $656 at amortized cost

The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to prior years due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018.

The primary uses of cash by the Parent Company are shareholder dividends, the repurchase of its common stock and interest on its outstanding indebtedness and operating expenses.

At the end of September 2018, the Company announced a change in its internal dividend policy which allows the
Company to increase the proportion of regulatory earnings transferred from Aflac U.S. and Aflac Japan to the Parent
Company. The Company intends to maintain higher than historical levels of capital and liquidity at the Parent Company's sourcesCompany with the goals of addressing the Company’s hedge costs and usesrelated potential need for collateral and mitigating against long-term weakening of cash are reasonably predictablethe Japanese yen. Further, the Company plans to continue to maintain a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar based investments at Aflac Japan and are not expectedconsider whether the amount of such investments should be increased

70


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

or decreased relative to changethe Company’s view of economic equity surplus in Aflac Japan in light of potentially rising hedge costs and other factors. See Item 2., Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under “Forward-Looking Information,” for a description of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the Company in the future. For additional information, see the Financing Activities subsection of this MD&A.regards to its capital management intentions.


The Parent Company also accesses debt security markets to provide additional sources of capital. WeIn September 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC in May 2015 that allows usthe Company to issue an indefinite amount of senior and subordinated debt securities, in one or more series, from time to time until May 2018.September 2021. In March 2014, weAugust 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration statement with Japanese regulatory authorities that allows usthe Parent Company to issue up to 100 billion yenconduct public offerings of bonds in Japan, including yen-denominated Samurai notes, up to 200 billion yen or its equivalent through August 2020. The shelf registration statement is for possible public offerings in Japan, through March 2016. Ifbut the bonds issued these yen-denominated Samurai notes would notunder the shelf may be availabletransferred by the bondholders to U.S. persons. We believepersons in compliance with U.S. law. The Company believes outside sources for additional debt and equity capital, if needed, will continue to be available. For additional information, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


The principal sources of cash for ourthe Company's insurance operations are premiums and investment income. The primary uses of cash by ourthe Company's insurance operations are investments, policy claims, commissions, operating expenses, income taxes and payments to the Parent Company for management fees and dividends. Both the sources and uses of cash are reasonably predictable.

74





When making an investment decision, ourthe Company's first consideration is based on product needs. OurThe Company's investment objectives provide for liquidity through the purchase of investment-grade debt securities. These objectives also take into account duration matching, and because of the long-term nature of ourthe Company's business, we havethe Company has adequate time to react to changing cash flow needs.


As a result of policyholder aging, claims payments are expected to gradually increase over the life of a policy. Therefore, future policy benefit reserves are accumulated in the early years of a policy and are designed to help fund future claims payments. We expect ourThe Company expects its future cash flows from premiums and ourits investment portfolio to be sufficient to meet ourits cash needs for benefits and expenses.


In October 2015,As of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company and Aflac jointly entered into a 364-day uncommitted bilateral line of credit that provides for borrowings in the amount of $100 million. Borrowings will bear interest at the rate quoted by the bank and agreed upon at the time of making such loan and will have a three-month maturity period. There are no related facility fees, upfront expenses or financial covenant requirements. Borrowings under this credit agreement may be used for general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the financing agreement will mature no later than three months after the last drawdown date of October 15, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under our $100 million credit agreement.

In September 2015, we amended and restated our 50.0 billion yen senior unsecured revolving credit facility agreement, due to expire in March 2018, pursuant to which the Parent Company and Aflac jointly entered into a new five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for borrowings of up to 55.0 billion yen or the equivalent of yen in U.S. dollars on a revolving basis. Borrowings bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (a) a eurocurrency rate determined by reference to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for the interest period relevant to such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (1) the federal funds effective rate plus ½ of 1%, (2) the rate of interest for such day announced by Mizuho Bank, Ltd. as its prime rate and (3) the eurocurrency rate for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%, in each case plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin ranges between .79% and 1.275% for eurocurrency rate borrowings and .0% and .275% for base rate borrowings, depending on the Parent Company’s debt ratings as of the date of determination. In addition, the Parent Company and Aflac are required to pay a facility fee on the commitments ranging between .085% and .225%, also based on the Parent Company’s debt ratings as of the date of determination. Borrowings under the amended and restated credit facility may be used for general corporate purposes, including a capital contingency plan for the operations of the Parent Company and Aflac. The amended and restated credit facility requires compliance with certain financial covenants on a quarterly basis and will expire on the earlier of (a) September 18, 2020, or (b) the date the commitments are terminated pursuant to an event of default, as such term is defined in the credit agreement. As of December 31, 2015, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under our 55.0 billion yen revolving credit agreement.

In February 2015, the Parent Company and Aflac jointly entered into an uncommitted bilateral linehad four lines of credit with a third party that provides for borrowingsparties as well as two intercompany lines of credit. For additional information on the Company's lines of credit, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As part of the FHLB financing arrangement as discussed previously in the amountAnalysis of $50 million. Borrowings will bear interest at the rate quoted by the bankFinancial Condition section of this MD&A, Aflac U.S. borrowed and agreed upon at the time of making such loan and will have a three-month maturity period. There are no related facility fees, upfront expenses or financial covenant requirements. Borrowings under this credit agreement may be used for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2015, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under our $50repaid $86 million credit agreement.during 2018.


OurThe Company's financial statements convey ourits financing arrangements during the periods presented. We haveThe Company has not engaged in material intra-period short-term financings during the periods presented that are not otherwise reported in ourits balance sheet. We weresheet or disclosed therein. The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of ourits notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2015. We have2018. The Company has not entered into transactions involving the transfer of financial assets with an obligation to repurchase financial assets that have been accounted for as a sale under applicable accounting standards, including securities lending transactions. See Notes 1, 3, and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on ourthe Company's securities lending and derivative activities. With the exception of disclosed activities in those referenced footnotes we doand the Risk Factors entitled, "The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate" and "Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity," the Company does not have a known trend, demand, commitment, event or uncertainty that would reasonably result in ourits liquidity increasing or decreasing by a material amount. OurAs of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company had $1.0 billion as a capital reserve and an additional $1.0 billion of contingent liquidity in order to mitigate liquidity risk of derivative positions that are reducing enterprise-wide foreign currency exposure. The Company's cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted cash on hand, money market instruments, and other debt instruments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased, all of which has minimal market, settlement or other risk exposure.


The following table presents the estimated payments by period of ourthe Company's major contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015. We2018. The Company translated ourits yen-denominated obligations using the December 31, 2015,2018, exchange rate. Actual future payments as reported in dollars will fluctuate with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate.


7571




Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Distribution of Payments by Period
(In millions)
Total
Liability
(1)
 Total
Payments
 Less
Than
One Year
 
One to
Three Years
 Four to
Five Years
 After
Five Years
Total
Liability
(1)
 Total
Payments
 Less
Than
One Year
 
One to
Three Years
 Four to
Five Years
 After
Five Years
Future policy benefits liability (Note 7)(2)
$69,687
  $234,854
 $7,813
 $15,497
 $15,475
 $196,069
$86,368
  $251,577
 $8,980
 $17,817
 $17,807
 $206,973
Unpaid policy claims liability (Note 7)(3)
3,802
  3,802
 2,504
 693
 303
 302
4,584
  4,584
 2,950
 951
 387
 296
Other policyholders' funds (Note 7)(3)
6,285
 9,977
 329
 387
 426
 8,835
7,146
 9,920
 321
 360
 581
 8,658
Long-term debt – principal (Note 9)
4,991
  4,997
 197
 650
 550
 3,600
5,765
  5,813
 0
 45
 1,275
 4,493
Long-term debt – interest (Note 9)
39
  3,115
 198
 360
 347
 2,210
37
  2,086
 175
 327
 284
 1,300
Cash collateral on loaned securities (Note 3)
941
 941
 941
 0
 0
 0
1,052
 1,052
 1,052
 0
 0
 0
Operating service agreements (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
362
 114
 130
 118
 0
N/A
(4) 
553
 165
 289
 99
 0
Operating lease obligations (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
172
 59
 75
 18
 20
N/A
(4) 
202
 63
 82
 39
 18
Capitalized lease obligations (Note 9)
20
  20
 6
 9
 4
 1
13
  13
 5
 5
 2
 1
Total contractual obligations$85,765
  $258,240
 $12,161
 $17,801
 $17,241
 $211,037
$104,965
  $275,800
 $13,711
 $19,876
 $20,474
 $221,739
Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of $15 have been excluded from the tabular disclosure above because the timing of cash payment is not reasonably estimable.
(1)Liability amounts are those reported on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 20152018.
(2)The estimated payments due by period reflect future estimated cash payments to be made to policyholders and others for future policy benefits. These projected cash outflows are based on assumptions for future policy persistency, mortality, morbidity, and other assumptions comparable with ourthe Company's experience, consider future premium receipts on current policies in force, and assume market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs. These cash outflows are undiscounted with respect to interest and, as a result, the sum of the cash outflows shown for all years in the table of $234,854$251,577 exceeds the corresponding liability amount of $69,687. We have$86,368. The Company has made significant assumptions to determine the future estimated cash outflows related to the underlying policies and contracts. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, actual cash outflow amounts and timing will differ, possibly materially, from these estimates.
(3)Includes assumptions as to the timing of policyholders reporting claims for prior periods and the amount of those claims. Actual amounts and timing of unpaid policy claims payments may differ significantly from the estimates above.
(4)Not applicable


For more information on ourthe Company's major contractual obligations, see the applicable Note in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as indicated in the line items in the table above.


Consolidated Cash Flows


We translateThe Company translates cash flows for Aflac Japan's yen-denominated items into U.S. dollars using weighted-average exchange rates. In years when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars causes more dollars to be reported.


The following table summarizes consolidated cash flows by activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Operating activities$6,776
 $6,550
 $10,547
 $6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 
Investing activities(4,897) (4,241) (11,091) (3,582) (5,431) (3,855) 
Financing activities(2,187) (147) 1,136
 (1,616) (2,065) (1,619) 
Exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents0
 (47) (90) 30
 0
 (4) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents$(308) $2,115
 $502
 $846
 $(1,368) $509
 


Operating Activities


Consolidated cash flow from operations increased 3.5%decreased 1.9% in 20152018, compared with 20142017. The following table summarizes operating cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$5,285
 $5,711
 $9,410
 $4,916
 $4,959
 $4,605
 
Aflac U.S. and other operations1,491
 839
 1,137
 1,098
 1,169
 1,382
 
Total$6,776
 $6,550
 $10,547
 $6,014
 $6,128
 $5,987
 




7672




The decrease in Aflac Japan operating cash flows during 2015
Item 7. Management's Discussion and 2014 was largely due to a decline in the salesAnalysis of the WAYS product which resulted in a reduced amountFinancial Condition and Results of cash received from discounted advance premiums.Operations


Investing Activities


Operating cash flow is primarily used to purchase debt securitiesinvestments to meet future policy obligations. The following table summarizes investing cash flows by source for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan$(4,147) $(4,129) $(10,293) $(2,938) $(4,504) $(3,075) 
Aflac U.S. and other operations(750) (112) (798) (644) (927) (780) 
Total$(4,897) $(4,241) $(11,091) $(3,582) $(5,431) $(3,855) 


Prudent portfolio management dictates that we attemptthe Company attempts to match the duration of ourits assets with the duration of ourits liabilities. Currently, when our fixed-maturity securities and perpetualthe Company's fixed maturity securities mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. However, the long-term nature of ourthe Company's business and ourits strong cash flows provide usthe Company with the ability to minimize the effect of mismatched durations and/or yields identified by various asset adequacy analyses. When neededFrom time to time or when market opportunities arise, we disposethe Company disposes of selected fixed-maturity and perpetualfixed maturity securities that are available for sale to improve the duration matching of our assets and liabilities, improve future investment yields, and/or re-balance ourits portfolio. As a result, dispositions before maturity can vary significantly from year to year. Dispositions before maturity were approximately 5%

As part of its overall corporate strategy, the Company announced in September 2018 that it intends to increase its original investment in the Aflac Ventures Fund from $100 million over three years to $250 million over three to four years, as opportunities emerge. These investments are included in equity securities or the other investments line in the consolidated balance sheets. The Aflac Ventures Fund is a subsidiary of Aflac Corporate Ventures which is reported in the "Corporate and other" business segment. The central mission of Aflac Corporate Ventures is to support the organic growth and business development needs of Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. with emphasis on digital applications designed to improve the customer experience, gain efficiencies, and develop new markets in an effort to enhance and defend long-term shareholder value.

See Note 3 of the annual averageNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on certain investment portfolio of fixed maturities and perpetual securities available for sale during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared with 6% in 2014 and 16% in 2013.commitments.


Financing Activities


Consolidated cash used by financing activities was $2.2 billion in 2015 and $147 million in 2014, compared with cash provided by financing activities of $1.1$1.6 billion in 2013.2018, $2.1 billion in 2017 and $1.6 billion in 2016.


In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.

In August 2015, we paid off $300October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of its senior notes to redeem $550 million of 3.45% fixed-ratethe Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In January 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of .932% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 10-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

73


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


In February 2017, the Parent Company extinguished $650 million of 2.65% senior notes upon their maturity.

In August 2015, we paid off a 5.0October 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen loanof subordinated debentures through a U.S. public debt offering. The debentures bear interest at its maturityan initial rate of 2.108% per annum through October 22, 2027, or earlier redemption. Thereafter, the rate of the interest of the debentures will be reset every five years at a rate of interest equal to the then-current JPY 5-year Swap Offered Rate plus 205 basis points. The debentures are payable semi-annually in arrears and have a 30-year maturity. The debentures are redeemable (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax events or certain rating agency events, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the debentures or (ii) in 10 years, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date (a total of approximately $41redemption. In November 2017, the Parent Company used a portion of net proceeds from the debenture offering to redeem $500 million usingof the exchange rate atParent Company's 5.50% subordinated debentures due 2052. The pretax non-operating expense due to the maturity date). In July 2015, we paid off a 10.0 billion yen loan at its maturity date (a totalearly redemption of approximately $81 million using the exchange rate at the maturity date).these notes was $13 million.


In March 2015,September 2016, the Parent Company issued two series of senior notes totaling $1.0 billion$700 million through a U.S. public debt offering. The first series, which totaled $550$300 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.40%2.875% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a five-year10-year maturity. The second series, which totaled $450$400 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.25%4.00% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a ten-year30-year maturity. We have entered into cross-currency swaps that convert the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the senior notes into yen-denominated obligations which results in lower nominal net interest rates on the debt. By entering into these cross-currency swaps, we economically converted our $550 million liability into a 67.0 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 2.40% in dollars to .24% in yen, and we economically converted our $450 million liability into a 55.0 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 3.25% in dollars to .82% in yen.

In April 2015,September 2016, the Parent Company used $1.0entered into two series of senior unsecured term loan facilities totaling 30.0 billion yen. The first series, which totaled 5.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to the TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .20% and .60%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of fixed-rate senior notes that were issuedthe date of determination. The second series, which totaled 25.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin. The applicable margin ranges between .35% and .75%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In December 2016, the Parent Company completed a tender offer in March 2015 to redeem allwhich it extinguished $176 million principal of our $850 million 8.50% fixed-rateits 6.90% senior notes due May 20192039 and to pay a portion$193 million principal of the corresponding $230 million make-whole premiumits 6.45% senior notes due 2040. The pretax non-operating loss due to the investorsearly redemption of these notes. We consider the make-whole payment a non-recurring transaction and therefore excluded this charge from operating earnings.notes was $137 million ($89 million after-tax, or $.21 per diluted share).


In November 2014,September 2016, the Parent Company issued $750 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes. In July 2014, we redeemed 28.7extinguished 8.0 billion yen of our2.26% fixed rate SamauriUridashi notes upon their maturity and 5.5in July 2016, the Parent Company extinguished 15.8 billion yen of our variable1.84% fixed rate Samurai notes upon their maturity (a total of approximately $335 million using the exchange rate on the date of redemption).maturity.


In June 2013, the Parent Company issued $700 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. We used part of these net proceeds for the debt redemptions in 2014. The balance of the net proceeds were used to repay or redeem, in whole or in part, the Parent Company’s $300 million senior notes that were due August 2015 and for general corporate purposes.


77



See Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the debt issuances discussed above.

Cash returned to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases was $2.0 billion in 2015, compared with $1.9 billion in 2014 and $1.4 billion in 2013.


See ourthe preceding discussion in this Capital Resources and Liquidity section of MD&A regarding the 364-day uncommitted bilateral line of credit entered into by the Parent Companyfor details and Aflac in October 2015 in the amount of $100 million; the five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility agreement entered into by the Parent Company and Aflac in September 2015 in the amount of 55 billion yen; and the $50 million uncommitted bilateral line of credit entered into by the Parent Company and Aflac in February 2015. Asany outstanding balances as of December 31, 2015, no borrowings were outstanding under these2018 for the Company's lines of credit.credit and FHLB financing arrangement.


We wereThe Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of ourits notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2015.2018.


Cash returned to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases was $2.1 billion in 2018, compared with $2.0 billion in 2017 and $2.1 billion in 2016.

The following tables present a summary of treasury stock activity during the years ended December 31.
Treasury Stock Purchased
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Treasury stock purchases$1,315
 $1,210
 $813
 $1,301
 $1,351
 $1,422
 
Number of shares purchased:            
Open market21,179
 19,660
 13,212
 28,949
 35,510
 43,236
 
Other247
 157
 222
 392
 1,018
 660
 
Total shares purchased21,426
 19,817
 13,434
 29,341
 36,528
 43,896
 

74


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Treasury Stock Issued
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Stock issued from treasury:            
Cash financing$36
 $33
 $88
 $58
 $33
 $46
 
Noncash financing64
 65
 65
 17
 59
 61
 
Total stock issued from treasury$100
 $98
 $153
 $75
 $92
 $107
 
Number of shares issued1,770
 1,763
 3,254
 1,939
 2,554
 3,704
 


Under share repurchase authorizations from ourthe Company's board of directors, wethe Company purchased 21.228.9 million shares of ourits common stock in the open market in 2015,2018, compared with 19.735.5 million shares in 20142017 and 13.243.2 million shares in 2013. In August 2015, Aflac's board of directors authorized the purchase of an additional 40 million shares of its common stock.2016. As of December 31, 2015,2018, a remaining balance of 48.469.0 million shares of ourthe Company's common stock was available for purchase under share repurchase authorizations by ourits board of directors. WeThe Company currently planplans to purchase $1.4repurchase $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion of ourits common stock in 2016, largely front-end loaded in the first half of the year.2019, assuming stable capital conditions and absent compelling alternatives. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


Cash dividends paid to shareholders in 20152018 of $1.58$1.04 per share increased 5.3%19.5% over 20142017. The 20142017 dividend paid of $1.50$.87 per share increased 5.6%4.8% over 20132016. The following table presents the dividend activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Dividends paid in cash$656
 $654
 $635
 $793
 $661
 $658
 
Dividends through issuance of treasury shares26
 26
 25
 8
 29
 27
 
Total dividends to shareholders$682
 $680
 $660
 $801
 $690
 $685
 


In February 2016,January 2019, the board of directors declaredannounced a 3.8% increase in the quarterly cash dividend, effective with the first quarter 2016of 2019. The first quarter 2019 cash dividend of $.41$.27 per share. The dividendshare is payable on March 1, 2016,2019, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 16, 2016.20, 2019.




78



Regulatory Restrictions


Aflac isand CAIC are domiciled in Nebraska and isare subject to its regulations. Subsequent to the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, Aflac Japan is domiciled in Japan and subject to local regulations. See further discussion
below. The Nebraska Department of Insurance imposes certain limitations and restrictions on payments of dividends, management fees, loans and advances by Aflac to the Parent Company. Under Nebraska insurance law, prior approval of the Nebraska Department of Insurance is required for dividend distributions that exceed the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. In addition, the Nebraska insurance department must approve service arrangements and other transactions within the affiliated group of companies. These regulatory limitations are not expected to affect the level of management fees or dividends paid by Aflac to the Parent Company. (See below for discussion of restrictions imposed by Japanese insurance regulators.) A life insurance company’s statutory capital and surplus is determined according to rules prescribed by the NAIC, as modified by the insurance department in the insurance company’s state of domicile. Statutory accounting rules are different from U.S. GAAP and are intended to emphasize policyholder protection and company solvency. Similar laws apply in New York, andthe domiciliary jurisdiction of Aflac's New York insurance subsidiary. As of December 2016, CAIC was redomiciled from South Carolina the domiciliary jurisdictions of the Parent Company's other insurance subsidiaries, Aflac New York and CAIC.to Nebraska.


The continued long-term growth of ourthe Company's business may require increases in the statutory capital and surplus of ourits insurance operations. Aflac’s insurance operations may secure additional statutory capital through various sources, such as internally generated statutory earnings, equitycapital contributions by the Parent Company from funds generated through debt or equity offerings, or reinsurance transactions. The NAIC’s risk-based capital (RBC)RBC formula is used by insurance regulators to help identify inadequately capitalized insurance companies. The RBC formula quantifies insurance risk, business risk, asset risk and interest rate risk by weighing the types and mixtures of risks inherent in the insurer’s operations.

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 933%560%. The 2018 RBC as filed is lower than Aflac U.S. standalone RBC due to the inclusion of Aflac Japan for the first quarter of 2018. The RBC charge reflects the business risk without any total adjusted capital (TAC). At December 31, 2015, compared with 945% at December 31, 2014.2017, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 831%, which included Aflac Japan. Aflac's RBC ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position.position, even reflecting the full negative impact of the U.S. Tax Act, which was fully adopted in 2018. This reduction occurs as a result of

75


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

writing down deferred tax assets and the increase in required capital due to the reduction in tax rates. However, Aflac expects to recover from this negative impact over a period of three to five years through additional statutory income, assuming that the additional income is fully retained. As of December 31, 2015,2018, Aflac's total adjusted capital of $11.7$2.7 billion exceeded the company action level required capital and surplus of $1.3$.5 billion by $10.4$2.2 billion.

The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid to the Parent Company by Aflac without prior approval of Nebraska's director of insurance is the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. Dividends declared by Aflac during 20162019 in excess of $2.3$1.3 billion would be considered extraordinary and require such approval. Following the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, the Company used extraordinary dividends as needed to actively manage to appropriate RBC levels that are lower yet sufficient to maintain ratings and support prudent capital management. See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the impact of permitted practices by the Nebraska Department of Insurance on ourthe Company's statutory capital and surplus.

The NAIC considers its Solvency Modernization Initiative (SMI) process relating to updating the U.S. insurance solvency regulation framework to be ongoing. The SMI has focused on key issues such as capital requirements, governance and risk management, group supervision, reinsurance, statutory accounting and financial reporting matters. Many of these key issues have been finalized and/or are near completion; however, the NAIC still has some ongoing initiatives related to SMI, such as monitoring the international efforts on group capital requirements and group supervision as well as risk-based capital.

RBC.In addition, the NAIC is also considering changes to limitations and restrictions imposedinvestment risk factors. Any negative developments by U.S. insurance regulators, Japan’s FSA may not allow profit repatriations from Aflac Japan if the transfers would cause Aflac Japan to lack sufficient financial strengthNAIC in these areas could result in increased capital requirements for the protection of policyholders. The FSA maintains its own solvency standard which is quantified through the solvency margin ratio (SMR). Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread and foreign exchange rate changes, therefore we continue to evaluate alternatives for reducing this sensitivity. In the event of a rapid change in market factors (such as interest rates), we have a senior unsecured revolving credit facility in the amount of 55 billion yen and a committed reinsurance facility in the amount of approximately 110 billion yen as capital contingency plans (see Notes 8 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). We have already undertaken measures to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR. For example, we employ policy reserve matching (PRM), which is a Japan-specific accounting treatment that reduces SMR interest rate sensitivity since PRM-designated investments are carried at amortized cost consistent with corresponding liabilities. For U.S. GAAP, PRM investments are categorized as available for sale. In the first quarter of 2015, Aflac Japan entered into a quota share arrangement to cede a portion of hospital benefits of one of our closed products. Under this coinsurance indemnity type of reinsurance, Aflac Japan released approximately 130 billion yen of FSA reserves. (See Notes 3, 4 and 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our investment strategies, hedging activities, and reinsurance, respectively.) As of December 31, 2015, Aflac Japan's SMR was 828%, compared with 857% at December 31, 2014.Company.


Aflac is subject to the NAIC’s Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA), effective January 1, 2015. Through the ORSA requirements, Aflac is expected to regularly, no less than annually, conduct an ORSA to assess the adequacy of its risk management framework, and its current and estimated projected future solvency position; internally document the process and results of the assessment; and provide a confidential high-level ORSA Summary Report annually to the lead state commissioner if the insurer is a member of an insurance group. In November 2018, Aflac filed its ORSA report on November 20, 2015 with the Nebraska Department of Insurance.



In addition to limitations and restrictions imposed by U.S. insurance regulators, after the Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, the new Japan subsidiary is required to meet certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law in order to provide dividends to the Parent Company. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at the Japan subsidiary is basically defined as retained earnings excluding capital reserves, which represent equity generated by capital profits that are statutorily required in Japan, less net after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities based on the previous fiscal year-end. These dividend capacity requirements are generally aligned with the solvency margin ratio (SMR). Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) maintains its own solvency standard which is quantified through the SMR. Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread, and foreign exchange rate changes, therefore the Company continues to evaluate alternatives for reducing this sensitivity. In the event of a rapid change in market risk conditions causing SMR to decline, the Company has two senior unsecured revolving credit facilities in the amounts of 100 billion yen and 55 billion yen, respectively, and a committed reinsurance facility in the amount of approximately 110 billion yen as a capital contingency plan. Additionally, the Company could take action to enter into derivatives on unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments with foreign currency options or forwards. (See Notes 8 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.)

The Company has already undertaken various measures to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR. For example, the Company employs policy reserve matching (PRM) investment strategies, which is a Japan-specific accounting treatment that reduces SMR interest rate sensitivity since PRM-designated investments are carried at amortized cost consistent with corresponding liabilities. In order for a PRM-designated asset to be held at amortized cost, there are certain criteria that must be maintained. The primary criteria relates to maintaining the duration of designated assets and liabilities within a specified tolerance range. If the duration difference is not maintained within the specified range without rebalancing, then a certain portion of the assets must be re-classified as available for sale and held at fair value with any associated unrealized gain or loss recorded in surplus. To rebalance, assets may need to be sold in order to maintain the duration with the specified range, resulting in realizing a gain or loss from the sale. For U.S. GAAP, PRM investments are categorized as available for sale. The Company also uses foreign currency derivatives to hedge a portion of its U.S. dollar-denominated investments.(See Notes 3, 4 and 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's investment strategies, hedging activities, and reinsurance, respectively.)

Aflac's SMR ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position. As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan's SMR was 965%, compared with 1,064% at December 31, 2017. As part of the conversion of Aflac Japan from a

7976




Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018, the Company experienced an accounting-driven decline in the SMR of approximately 130 points, compared with the SMR as of December 31, 2017. The Company expects to be able to pay dividends out of certain accounts, thus restoring this accounting impact over an estimated three-year period.

The FSA has been conducting field testing with the insurance industry concerning the introduction of an economic value-based solvency regime. The field testing will assist the FSA in determining if an economic value-based solvency regime in Japan will be appropriate for the insurance industry.

Payments are made from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company for management fees, and to Aflac U.S. for allocated expenses and remittances of earnings. Prior to the Aflac Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan paid allocated expenses and profit remittances to Aflac U.S. The following table details Aflac Japan remittances for the years ended December 31.


Aflac Japan Remittances
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 
Aflac Japan management fees paid to Parent Company$53
 $39
 $37
 $136
 $93
 $79
 
Expenses allocated to Aflac Japan (in dollars)101
 71
 74
 24
 109
 106
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to Aflac U.S. (in dollars)2,139
 1,704
 771
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to Aflac U.S. (in yen)259.0
 181.4
 76.8
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in dollars)808
 1,150
 1,286
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in yen)89.7
 129.3
 138.5
 


InThe decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2014, we began2018. Management fees decreased during 2018 compared to increaseprior years due to changes in the frequencyadministration of capital transfers from Japanintercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the United Statesconversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to better manage cash flow. This capital repatriation is reflected in Aflac Japan's SMR asa subsidiary on April 1, 2018. See the preceding Hedging Activities subsection of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

We entered into foreign exchange forwards and options as partthis MD&A for discussion of an economic hedge on foreign exchange risk on 242.5 billionParent Company hedging of yen of profit repatriation received in 2015, resulting in $71 million of additional funds received when the yen were exchanged into dollars.

remittances. For additional information on regulatory restrictions on dividends, profit repatriationsremittances and other transfers, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Other


For information regarding commitments and contingent liabilities, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Additional Information

Investors should note that the Company announces material financial information in its SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls. In accordance with SEC guidance, the Company may also use the Investor Relations section of the Company's website (http://investors.aflac.com) to communicate with investors about the Company. It is possible that the financial and other information the Company posts there could be deemed to be material information. The information on the Company's website is not part of this document.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information requiredCompany is exposed primarily to the following types of market risks: currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and equity risk. Fluctuations in these factors could impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The Company regularly monitors its market risks and uses a variety of strategies to manage its exposure
to these market risks.

Currency Risk

Aflac Japan

The functional currency of Aflac Japan's insurance operations is the Japanese yen. Aflac Japan’s premiums and a significant portion of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Most of Aflac Japan's cash and liabilities are yen-denominated.

77


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


As discussed above in the Investment subsection of Item 1, Business, the Company engages in hedging activities to mitigate certain currency risks from holding U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan. However, this hedging program in turn poses a countervailing long-term risk of loss on hedging currency derivatives under the long-term scenario of weakening yen, and related derivative rollover risk that could amplify hedge cost in unfavorable market conditions and significantly increase liquidity requirements to support negative derivative settlements. Additionally, as discussed in detail in the Risk Factors section titled “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity,” there is a risk that losses realized on derivative settlements during periods of weakening yen may not be recouped through realization of the corresponding holding currency gains on the hedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments if these investments are not ultimately converted to yen. The following table details Aflac Japan's portfolio allocation by Item 7Acurrency as of December 31.

Japan Segment Portfolio Allocation by Currency
(In millions) 2018 2017 
  
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
USD program $24,435
$24,258
 $22,432
$23,716
 
Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen 1,679
2,269
 1,650
2,549
 
   Total dollar-denominated investments 26,114
26,527
 24,082
26,265
 
   Total yen-denominated investments 74,974
86,251
 72,369
84,379
 
      Total $101,088
$112,778
 $96,451
$110,644
 

As of December 31, 2018, Aflac Japan had $9.9 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency forwards and $9.5 billion outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency options, of which none were in-the-money, hedging the U.S. dollar-denominated investments (USD Program). The fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolio was $14.4 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

As noted above, in late 2017, the Company took steps to refine the strategy to mitigate currency exposure of Aflac Japan from U.S. dollar-denominated investments while balancing the consideration of the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan. This refinement in strategy resulted in an increased amount of the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan while at the same time mitigating hedge cost increases. Generally, Aflac Japan’s exposure to the currency risk increases when its portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments increases. This increases the volatility of the SMR and FSA earnings and may result in an adverse impact on these regulatory measures when yen appreciates relatively to U.S. dollar. This in turn may reduce Aflac Japan’s dividend capacity, as well as increase the level of capital needed to support increased SMR volatility. The adverse impact on the regulatory measures could be amplified by regulatory accounting rules requiring impairment loss recognition on prolonged significant declines in U.S. dollar relative to yen. Furthermore, under the scenario where unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments are needed to pay Aflac Japan’s yen-denominated obligations, they would have to be converted to yen, which could force realization of the then potential currency losses. As the value of the U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio in Aflac Japan fluctuates and the Company’s business model evolves, the Company periodically reevaluates this size of the unhedged portfolio and may accordingly adjust up or down its currency hedging targets.

Aflac Inc.

The Company is incorporated by referenceexposed to currency risk as an economic event when yen funds are actually converted into U.S. dollars. This occurs when yen-denominated funds are paid as dividends and management fees from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company and with quarterly settlements of its reinsurance retrocession transactions. The exchange rates prevailing at the time of yen payments will differ from the exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. A portion of the yen dividend and management fee payments may be used to service Aflac Incorporated's yen-denominated notes payable with the remainder converted into U.S. dollars.

In addition to yen payments and the reinsurance retrocessions, certain investment activities for Aflac Japan expose the Company to economic currency risk when yen are converted into U.S. dollars. As noted above, the Company invests a portion of its yen cash flows in U.S. dollar-denominated assets. This requires that the Company convert the yen cash flows to U.S. dollars before investing. As previously discussed, for certain of its U.S. dollar-denominated securities, the Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of hedged

78


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RisksRisk

investments. In 2018, the Parent Company entered into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency rate risk to dividend payments by Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. If the markets experience a significant strengthening of yen, this could cause cash strain at the Parent Company as a result of cash collateral and potentially cash settlement requirements. Based on the timing and severity of exchange rate fluctuations combined with the level of outstanding activity in this program, the cash strain at the Parent Company could be significant.
Aside from the activities discussed above, the Company generally does not convert yen into U.S. dollars; however, it does translate financial statement amounts from yen into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, reported amounts are affected by foreign currency fluctuations. The Company reports unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income. In periods when the yen weakens against the dollar, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes more U.S. dollars to be reported. The weakening of the yen relative to the U.S. dollar will generally adversely affect the value of the Company's yen-denominated investments in U.S. dollar terms. The Company also considers the stressed economic surplus in Aflac Japan and related exposure to foreign currency. The Company manages this currency risk by investing a portion of Aflac Japan's investment portfolio in U.S. dollar-denominated securities and by the Parent Company's issuance of yen-denominated debt (for additional information, see the discussion under the Investments subsection within Item 1, Business). As a result, the effect of currency fluctuations on the Company's net assets is reduced.
The following table demonstrates the effect of foreign currency fluctuations by presenting the dollar values of the Company's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, and its consolidated yen-denominated net asset exposure at selected exchange rates as of December 31.

79


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Dollar Value of Yen-Denominated Assets and Liabilities
at Selected Exchange Rates
(In millions)2018 2017 
Yen/dollar exchange rates96.00
 
111.00 (1)

 126.00
 98.00
 
113.00(1)

 128.00
 
Yen-denominated financial instruments:            
Assets:            
Securities available for sale:            
Fixed maturity securities (2)
$55,600
 $48,086
 $42,362
 $51,504
 $44,666
 $39,433
 
Fixed maturity securities - consolidated
variable interest entities
 (3)
941
 814
 717
 1,089
 944
 834
 
Securities held to maturity:            
Fixed maturity securities35,055
 30,318
 26,709
 36,240
 31,430
 27,747
 
Equity securities742
 641
 565
 126
 109
 96
 
Equity securities - consolidated variable
interest entities
0
 0
 0
 675
 586
 517
 
Cash and cash equivalents988
 855
 753
 222
 193
 170
 
Derivatives2,712
 417
 949
 1,961
 331
 528
 
Other financial instruments253
 219
 192
 228
 198
 175
 
Subtotal96,291
 81,350
 72,247
 92,045
 78,457
 69,500
 
Liabilities:            
Notes payable2,120
 1,831
 1,615
 1,535
 1,331
 1,175
 
Derivatives1,318
 387
 2,138
 516
 474
 2,177
 
Subtotal3,438
 2,218
 3,753
 2,051
 1,805
 3,352
 
Net yen-denominated financial instruments92,853
 79,132
 68,494
 89,994
 76,652
 66,148
 
Other yen-denominated assets10,795
 9,336
 8,225
 9,406
 8,157
 7,201
 
Other yen-denominated liabilities113,994
 98,590
 86,853
 107,761
 93,456
 82,504
 
Consolidated yen-denominated net assets
(liabilities) subject to foreign currency
fluctuation
(2)
$(10,346) $(10,122) $(10,134) $(8,361) $(8,647) $(9,155) 
(1) Actual period-end exchange rate
(2) Does not include the U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds for which the Company has entered into foreign currency derivatives as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A
(3) Does not include U.S. dollar-denominated bonds that have corresponding cross-currency swaps in consolidated VIEs

The Company is required to consolidate certain VIEs. Some of the consolidated VIEs in Aflac Japan's portfolio use foreign currency swaps to convert foreign denominated cash flows to yen, the functional currency of Aflac Japan, in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations. Foreign currency swaps exchange an initial principal amount in two currencies, agreeing to re-exchange the currencies at a future date, at an agreed upon exchange rate. There may also be periodic exchanges of payments at specified intervals based on the agreed upon rates and notional amounts. Prior to consolidation, the Company's beneficial interest in these VIEs was a yen-denominated available-for-sale fixed maturity security. Upon consolidation, the original yen-denominated investment was derecognized and the underlying fixed maturity securities and cross-currency swaps were recognized. The combination of a U.S. dollar-denominated investment and cross-currency swap economically creates a yen-denominated investment and has no impact on the Company's net investment hedge position.

Similarly, the combination of the U.S. corporate bonds and the foreign currency forwards and options that the Company has entered into, as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A, economically creates a yen-denominated investment that qualifies for inclusion as a component of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan for net investment hedge purposes.

For additional information regarding the Company's Aflac Japan net investment hedge, see the Hedging Activities subsection of MD&A.


80


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

The Company's primary interest rate exposure is to the impact of changes in interest rates on the fair value of its investments in debt securities. The Company monitors its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis utilizing a full valuation methodology, measuring price volatility, and sensitivity of the fair values of its investments to interest rate changes on the debt securities the Company owns. For example, if the current duration of a debt security is 10 years, then the fair value of that security will increase by approximately 10% if market interest rates decrease by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant. Likewise, the fair value of the debt security will decrease by approximately 10% if market interest rates increase by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant.

The estimated effect of potential increases in interest rates on the fair values of debt securities the Company owns; derivatives, excluding credit default swaps, and notes payable as of December 31 follows:

Sensitivity of Fair Values of Financial Instruments section
to Interest Rate Changes
  2018 2017
(In millions)Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
 Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
Assets:             
Debt securities:             
     Fixed maturity securities:             
          Yen-denominated $85,622
  $73,673
   $83,682
  $72,146
 
          Dollar-denominated 33,995
  31,327
   38,703
  35,518
 
             Total debt securities $119,617
  $105,000
   $122,385
  $107,664
 
Loans and loan receivables(1)
 $6,893
  $6,834
   $2,987
  $2,932
 
Derivatives $417
  $614
   $330
  $533
 
Liabilities:             
Notes payable(2)
 $5,876
  $5,415
   $5,553
  $4,900
 
Derivatives 387
  422
   474
  293
 
(1)Includes TREs, CMLs and MMLs, excludes policy loans
(2)Excludes capitalized lease obligations

There are various factors that affect the fair value of MD&Athe Company's investment in Part II, debt securities. Included in those factors are changes in the prevailing interest rate environment, which directly affect the balance of unrealized gains or losses for a given period in relation to a prior period. Decreases in market yields generally improve the fair value of debt securities, while increases in market yields generally have a negative impact on the fair value of the Company's debt securities. However, the Company does not expect to realize a majority of any unrealized gains or losses. For additional information on unrealized losses on debt securities, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac Japan's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)2018 2017 
Yen-denominated debt securities16
 15
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years15
 14
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force10
 10
 


81


Item 7,7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)2018 2017 
Dollar-denominated debt securities9
 10
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years8
 8
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force6
 6
 

The following table shows a comparison of average required interest rates for future policy benefits and investment yields, based on amortized cost, for the years ended December 31.
Comparison of Interest Rates for Future Policy Benefits
and Investment Yields
(Net of Investment Expenses)
  201820172016
  U.S.        JapanU.S.        JapanU.S.        Japan
Policies issued during year:                  
Required interest on policy reserves 3.69%  1.00%
(1) 
 3.69%  1.10%
(1) 
 3.67%  1.38%
(1) 
New money yield on investments 4.44
  2.94
  4.41
  1.88
  3.81
  1.30
 
Policies in force at year-end:                  
Required interest on policy reserves 5.34
  3.29
(1) 
 5.43
  3.38
(1) 
 5.51
  3.49
(1) 
Portfolio book yield, end of period 5.44
  2.49
  5.44
  2.46
  5.52
  2.52
 
(1)Represents investments for Aflac Japan that support policy obligations and therefore excludes Aflac Japan’s annuity products

The Company continues to monitor the spread between its new money yield and the required interest assumption for newly issued products in both the United States and Japan and will re-evaluate those assumptions as necessary. Currently, when investments the Company owns mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that of the interest required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. Overall, adequate profit margins exist in Aflac Japan's aggregate block of business because of changes in the mix of business and favorable experience from mortality, morbidity and expenses.

Periodically, the Company may enter into derivative transactions to hedge interest rate risk, depending on general economic conditions.

For further information on interest rate derivatives, see Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Credit Risk

A significant portion of the Company's investment portfolio consists of debt securities and loans that expose it to the credit risk of the underlying issuer or borrower. The Company carefully evaluates this report.risk on every new investment and closely monitors the credit risk of its existing investment portfolio. The Company incorporates the needs of its products and liabilities, the overall requirements of the business, and other factors in addition to its underwriting of the credit risk for each investment in the portfolio.


Evaluating the underlying risks in the Company's credit portfolio involves a multitude of factors including but not limited to its assessment of the issuer's or borrower's business activities, assets, products, market position, financial condition, and future prospects. The Company incorporates the assessment of the NRSROs in assigning credit ratings and incorporates the rating methodologies of its specialist external managers in assigning loan ratings to portfolio holdings. The Company performs extensive internal assessments of the credit risks for all its portfolio holdings and potential new investments, which includes using analyses provided by the Company's specialist external managers. For assets managed by external asset managers, the Company provides investment and credit risk parameters that must be used when making investment decisions and require ongoing monitoring and reporting from the asset managers on significant changes in credit risks within the portfolio.


82


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Investment Concentrations

The Company's 15 largest global investment exposures were as follows:

Largest Global Investment Positions
(In millions)
December 31, 2018
    Total % of Total  
No. Consolidated Corporate/Sovereign Exposure Consolidated Fixed Maturity Credit
    Book Value Securities Rating
1 
Japan National Government (1)
 $51,207
 47.78% A+
2 Bank of America NA 411
 .38
  
      Bank of America Corp. 231
 .21
 A-
      Bank of America Corp. 180
 .17
 BBB+
3 Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. 405
 .38
 A-
4 Investcorp SA 383
 .36
 BB
5 Republic of South Africa 360
 .34
 BB+
6 Banobras 333
 .31
 BBB+
7 Nordea Bank AB 302
 .28
  
      Nordea Bank AB 231
 .21
 A-
      Nordea Bank AB 71
 .07
 BBB+
8 AXA 293
 .27
 BBB+
9 Deutsche Telekom AG 291
 .27
 BBB+
10 Japan Expswy Hld and Debt 291
 .27
 A+
11 CFE 287
 .27
 BBB+
12 AT&T Inc. 281
 .27
 BBB
13 Czech Republic 270
 .25
 A+
14 Investor AB 270
 .25
 AA-
15 Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) 270
 .25
 BBB+
                   Subtotal $55,654
 51.93%  
  Total fixed maturity securities $107,174
 100.00%  
(1)JGBs or JGB-backed securities
As previously disclosed, the Company owns long-dated debt instruments in support of its long-dated policyholder obligations. Some of the Company's largest global investment holdings are positions that were purchased many years ago and increased in size due to merger and consolidation activity among the issuing entities. In addition, many of the Company's largest holdings are yen-denominated, therefore strengthening of the yen can increase its position in dollars, and weakening of the yen can decrease its position in dollars. The Company's global investment guidelines establish concentration limits for its investment portfolios.

Geographical Exposure

The following table indicates the geographic exposure of the Company's debt securities as of December 31.

83


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 2018 2017 
(In millions)Amortized Cost % of
Total
 Amortized Cost % of
Total
 
Japan$55,486
 51.8% $51,983
 48.8% 
United States and Canada (1)
29,371
 27.4
 31,052
 29.1
 
United Kingdom3,038
 2.8
 2,603
 2.4
 
Germany2,179
 2.0
 2,323
 2.2
 
France2,030
 1.9
 1,983
 1.9
 
Peripheral Eurozone2,165
 2.0
 2,312
 2.2
 
     Portugal215
 .2
 211
 .2
 
     Italy1,261
 1.2
 1,261
 1.2
 
     Ireland29
 .0
 32
 .0
 
     Spain660
 .6
 808
 .8
 
Nordic Region1,615
 1.6
 1,611
 1.5
 
     Sweden779
 .7
 725
 .7
 
     Norway378
 .4
 451
 .4
 
     Denmark270
 .3
 177
 .2
 
     Finland188
 .2
 258
 .2
 
Other Europe2,425
 2.3
 2,489
 2.3
 
     Netherlands1,206
 1.1
 1,183
 1.1
 
     Switzerland258
 .2
 307
 .3
 
     Czech Republic451
 .5
 442
 .4
 
     Austria125
 .1
 123
 .1
 
     Belgium178
 .2
 168
 .1
 
     Poland180
 .2
 177
 .2
 
     Luxembourg27
 .0
 89
 .1
 
Asia excluding Japan2,722
 2.5
 3,408
 3.2
 
Africa and Middle East2,018
 1.9
 2,460
 2.3
 
Latin America2,153
 2.0
 2,318
 2.2
 
Australia1,620
 1.5
 1,572
 1.5
 
All Others352
 .3
 448
 .4
 
     Total fixed maturity securities$107,174
 100.0% $106,562
 100.0% 
(1) Includes total exposure to Puerto Rico of $1 million of required deposits at both December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of which 100% had principal and interest insurance at both December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The primary factor considered when determining the domicile of investment exposure is the legal country risk location of the issuer. However, other factors such as the location of the parent guarantor, the location of the company's headquarters or major business operations (including location of major assets), location of primary market (including location of revenue generation) and specific country risk publicly recognized by rating agencies can influence the assignment of the country (or geographic) risk location. When the issuer is a special financing vehicle or a branch or subsidiary of a global company, then the Company considers any guarantees and/or legal, regulatory and corporate relationships of the issuer relative to its ultimate parent in determining the proper assignment of country risk.


84


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Derivative Counterparties
The Company is a direct counterparty to the foreign currency swaps that it has entered into in connection with certain of its senior notes and subordinated debentures; foreign currency forwards; foreign currency options; and interest rate swaptions, therefore the Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties in those contracts. For the foreign currency and credit default swaps associated with the Company's VIE investments for which it is the primary beneficiary, the Company bears the risk of foreign exchange and/or credit loss due to counterparty default even though it is not a direct counterparty to those contracts. The risk of counterparty default for the Company's VIE and senior note and subordinated debenture swaps, foreign currency swaps, certain foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options and interest rate swaptions is mitigated by collateral posting requirements that counterparties to those transactions must meet. If collateral posting agreements are not in place, the counterparty risk associated with foreign currency forwards and foreign currency options is the risk that at expiry of the contract, the counterparty is unable to deliver the agreed upon amount of yen at the agreed upon price or delivery date, thus exposing the Company to additional unhedged exposure to U.S. dollars in the Aflac Japan investment portfolio. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Equity Risk

Market prices for equity securities are subject to fluctuation and consequently the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions. If equity prices experienced a hypothetical broad-based decline of 10%, the fair value of the Company's equity investments would decline by approximately $99 million.


85




ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013. Based on our evaluation under this framework, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 20152018.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152018, which is included herein.


8086




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
TheTo the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Shareholders
Aflac Incorporated:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Aflac Incorporated'sIncorporated and subsidiaries’ (the Company)“Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Aflac Incorporated'sCommission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”), and our report dated February 25, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 25, 2019

87


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Aflac Incorporated:

Opinion on the ConsolidatedFinancial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aflac Incorporated and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, Aflac Incorporated maintained,the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, effective internal control overthe financial reportingposition of the Company as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by2018 and 2017, and the Committeeresults of Sponsoring Organizationsits operations and its cash flows for each of the Treadway Commission (COSO).years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of Aflac Incorporated and subsidiariesCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the related consolidated statementsCommittee of earnings, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity, and cash flows for eachSponsoring Organizations of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015,Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 25, 20162019 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 25, 2016


81



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Aflac Incorporated:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aflac Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity, and cash flows for eacheffectiveness of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015. Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aflac Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Aflac Incorporated's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 25, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.




/s/ KPMG LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1963.
Atlanta, Georgia
February 25, 20162019




8288




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Years Ended December 31,
 
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Revenues:              
Net premiums, principally supplemental health insurance $17,570
 $19,072
 $20,135
  $18,677
 $18,531
 $19,225
 
Net investment income 3,135
 3,319
 3,293
  3,442
 3,220
 3,278
 
Realized investment gains (losses):              
Other-than-temporary impairment losses realized (153) (31) (199)  (81) (37) (85) 
Sales and redemptions 303
 215
 262
 
Derivative and other gains (losses) (10) 31
 336
 
Other gains (losses) (1)
 (349) (114) 71
 
Total realized investment gains (losses) 140
 215
 399
  (430) (151) (14) 
Other income (loss) 27
 122
 112
  69
 67
 70
 
Total revenues 20,872
 22,728
 23,939
  21,758
 21,667
 22,559
 
Benefits and expenses:              
Benefits and claims, net 11,746
 12,937
 13,813
  12,000
 12,181
 12,919
 
Acquisition and operating expenses:              
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs 1,066
 1,108
 1,074
  1,245
 1,132
 1,141
 
Insurance commissions 1,303
 1,436
 1,528
  1,320
 1,316
 1,368
 
Insurance expenses 2,214
 2,261
 2,222
 
Insurance and other expenses (2)
 2,988
 2,780
 2,796
 
Interest expense 289
 317
 293
  222
 240
 268
 
Other expenses 392
(1) 
 178
 193
 
Total acquisition and operating expenses 5,264
 5,300
   5,310
  5,775
 5,468
   5,573
 
Total benefits and expenses 17,010
 18,237
   19,123
  17,775
 17,649
   18,492
 
Earnings before income taxes 3,862
 4,491
 4,816
  3,983
 4,018
 4,067
 
Income tax expense:              
Current 1,288
 1,079
 1,236
  1,379
 631
 884
 
Deferred 41
  461
 422
  (316)  (1,217) 524
 
Income taxes 1,329
 1,540
 1,658
  1,063
 (586) 1,408
 
Net earnings $2,533
 $2,951
 $3,158
  $2,920
 $4,604
 $2,659
 
Net earnings per share:              
Basic $5.88
 $6.54
 $6.80
  $3.79
 $5.81
 $3.23
 
Diluted 5.85
 6.50
 6.76
  3.77
 5.77
 3.21
 
Weighted-average outstanding common shares used in
computing earnings per share (In thousands):
              
Basic 430,654
 451,204
 464,502
  769,588
 792,042
 822,942
 
Diluted 433,172
 454,000
 467,408
  774,650
 797,861
 827,841
 
(1) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2018 related to financial instruments.
(2) Includes expense of $230$13 in 2017 and $137 in 2016 for the make-whole payment associated with the early extinguishment of debt
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.




8389




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31,
 
(In millions)2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Net earnings $2,533
 $2,951
 $3,158
  $2,920
 $4,604
 $2,659
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes:              
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during
period
 360
 (1,455) (1,588)  232
 286
 283
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:       
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities during
period
 (2,534) 5,947
 (2,362) 
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses on
investment securities included in net earnings
 (61) (54) (56) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities: (1)
       
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities
during period
 (3,155) 1,731
 2,852
 
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses on
fixed maturity securities included in net earnings
 46
 2
 (53) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period 0
 (17) (10)  2
 1
 3
 
Pension liability adjustment during period (20) (76) 157
  (25) 9
 (45) 
Total other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes (2,255) 4,345
 (3,859)  (2,900) 2,029
 3,040
 
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
 (901) 1,803
 (581)  (797) 631
 1,035
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes (1,354) 2,542
 (3,278)  (2,103) 1,398
 2,005
 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $1,179
 $5,493
 $(120)  $817
 $6,002
 $4,664
 
(1) See Note 1 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

84



Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
(In millions)2015 2014 
Assets:    
Investments and cash:    
Securities available for sale, at fair value:    
Fixed maturities (amortized cost $56,903 in 2015 and $55,365 in 2014)$60,795
 $61,407
 
Fixed maturities - consolidated variable interest entities (amortized
cost $3,739 in 2015 and $3,020 in 2014)
4,554
 4,166
 
Perpetual securities (amortized cost $1,586 in 2015 and $2,035 in 2014)1,719
 2,240
 
Perpetual securities - consolidated variable interest entities
(amortized cost $255 in 2015 and $405 in 2014)
228
 429
 
Equity securities (cost $117 in 2015 and $19 in 2014)135
 28
 
Equity securities - consolidated variable interest entities
(cost $363 in 2015 and $0 in 2014)
363
 0
 
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost:    
Fixed maturities (fair value $37,520 in 2015 and $38,413 in 2014)33,459
 34,159
 
Fixed maturities - consolidated variable interest entities (fair value
$0 in 2015 and $84 in 2014)
0
 83
 
Other investments294
 171
 
Cash and cash equivalents4,350
 4,658
 
Total investments and cash105,897
 107,341
 
Receivables705
 842
 
Accrued investment income768
 762
 
Deferred policy acquisition costs8,511
 8,273
 
Property and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation427
 429
 
Other(1)
1,988
 2,120
 
Total assets$118,296
 $119,767
 
(1) Includes $102 in 2015 and $106 in 2014Statements for the adoption of derivatives from consolidated variable interest entitiesaccounting guidance on January 1, 2018 related to financial instruments.
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


(continued)

8590




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
December 31,
 
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2015 2014 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:    
Liabilities:    
Policy liabilities:    
Future policy benefits$69,687
 $65,646
 
Unpaid policy claims3,802
 3,630
 
Unearned premiums7,857
 8,626
 
Other policyholders’ funds6,285
 6,031
 
Total policy liabilities87,631
 83,933
 
Income taxes4,340
 5,293
 
Payables for return of cash collateral on loaned securities941
 2,193
 
Notes payable5,011
 5,282
 
Other(2)
2,665
 4,719
 
Total liabilities100,588
 101,420
 
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 15)
 
 
Shareholders’ equity:    
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000
shares in 2015 and 2014; issued 669,723 shares in 2015 and 668,132
shares in 2014
67
 67
 
Additional paid-in capital1,828
 1,711
 
Retained earnings24,007
 22,156
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):    
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)(2,196) (2,541) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities2,986
 4,672
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives(26) (26) 
Pension liability adjustment(139) (126) 
Treasury stock, at average cost(8,819) (7,566) 
Total shareholders’ equity17,708
 18,347
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$118,296
 $119,767
 
(In millions)2018 2017 
Assets:    
Investments and cash:    
Securities available for sale, at fair value:    
Fixed maturity securities (amortized cost $73,007 in 2018 and
$70,594 in 2017)
(1)
$78,429
 $78,804
 
Fixed maturity securities - consolidated variable interest entities (amortized
cost $3,849 in 2018 and $4,538 in 2017)
(1)
4,466
 5,509
 
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost:    
Fixed maturity securities (fair value $36,722 in 2018 and $38,072 in 2017)30,318
 31,430
 
Equity securities, at fair value:    
Equity securities (1)
827
 270
 
Equity securities - consolidated variable interest entities160
 753
 
Other investments (2)
7,706
 3,402
 
Cash and cash equivalents4,337
 3,491
 
Total investments and cash126,243
 123,659
 
Receivables851
 827
 
Accrued investment income773
 769
 
Deferred policy acquisition costs9,875
 9,505
 
Property and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation443
 434
 
Other (3)
2,221
 2,023
 
Total assets$140,406
 $137,217
 
(1) Includes perpetual securities, see Notes 1 and 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Includes $293$5,856 in 20152018 and $318$2,341 in 20142017 of loan receivables and limited partnerships from consolidated variable interest entities
(3) Includes $182 in 2018 and $151 in 2017 of derivatives from consolidated variable interest entities
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


(continued)

8691



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
December 31,
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2018 2017 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:    
Liabilities:    
Policy liabilities:    
Future policy benefits$86,368
 $81,857
 
Unpaid policy claims4,584
 4,392
 
Unearned premiums5,090
 5,959
 
Other policyholders’ funds7,146
 6,939
 
Total policy liabilities103,188
 99,147
 
Income taxes4,020
 4,745
 
Payables for return of cash collateral on loaned securities1,052
 606
 
Notes payable5,778
 5,289
 
Other (4)
2,906
 2,832
 
Total liabilities116,944
 112,619
 
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 15)

 

 
Shareholders’ equity:    
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000
shares in 2018 and 2017; issued 1,347,540 shares in 2018 and 1,345,762
shares in 2017
135
 135
 
Additional paid-in capital2,177
 2,052
 
Retained earnings31,788
 29,895
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):    
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)(1,847) (1,750) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities (5)
4,234
 5,964
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives(24) (23) 
Pension liability adjustment(212) (163) 
Treasury stock, at average cost(12,789) (11,512) 
Total shareholders’ equity23,462
 24,598
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$140,406
 $137,217
 
(4) Includes $102 in 2018 and $128 in 2017 of derivatives from consolidated variable interest entities
(5) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2018 related to financial instruments.
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

92



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Years Ended December 31,
 
(In millions, except for per-share amounts)2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Common stock:          
Balance, beginning of period$67
 $67
 $67
$135
 $135
 $135
Balance, end of period67
 67
 67
135
 135
 135
Additional paid-in capital:          
Balance, beginning of period1,711
 1,644
 1,505
2,052
 1,908
 1,760
Exercise of stock options43
 29
 50
34
 38
 46
Share-based compensation36
 (3) 32
54
 51
 64
Gain (loss) on treasury stock reissued38
 41
 57
37
 55
 38
Balance, end of period1,828
 1,711
 1,644
2,177
 2,052
 1,908
Retained earnings:          
Balance, beginning of period22,156
 19,885
 17,387
29,895
 25,981
 24,007
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - financial instruments,
net of income taxes
(1)
148
 0
 0
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - tax effects from tax reform (1)
(374) 0
 0
Net earnings2,533
 2,951
 3,158
2,920
 4,604
 2,659
Dividends to shareholders ($1.58 per share in 2015, $1.50 per share in 2014 and
$1.42 per share in 2013)
(682) (680) (660)
Dividends to shareholders ($1.04 per share in 2018, $.87 per share in 2017 and
$.83 per share in 2016)
(801) (690) (685)
Balance, end of period24,007
 22,156
 19,885
31,788
 29,895
 25,981
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):          
Balance, beginning of period1,979
 (563) 2,715
4,028
 2,630
 625
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - financial instruments,
net of income taxes
(1)
(148) 0
 0
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - tax effects from tax reform (1)
374
 0
 0
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during
period, net of income taxes
345
 (1,036) (1,838)228
 233
 213
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities during period,
net of income taxes and reclassification adjustments
(1,686) 3,637
 (1,535)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities during
period, net of income taxes and reclassification adjustments
(1)
(2,316) 1,159
 1,819
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period, net of
income taxes
0
 (14) (7)2
 1
 2
Pension liability adjustment during period, net of income taxes(13) (45) 102
(17) 5
 (29)
Balance, end of period625
 1,979
 (563)2,151
 4,028
 2,630
Treasury stock:          
Balance, beginning of period(7,566) (6,413) (5,696)(11,512) (10,172) (8,819)
Purchases of treasury stock(1,315) (1,210) (813)(1,317) (1,391) (1,422)
Cost of shares issued62
 57
 96
40
 51
 69
Balance, end of period(8,819) (7,566) (6,413)(12,789) (11,512) (10,172)
Total shareholders’ equity$17,708
 $18,347
 $14,620
$23,462
 $24,598
 $20,482
(1) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2018.
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


8793




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:              
Net earnings $2,533
 $2,951
 $3,158
  $2,920
 $4,604
 $2,659
 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:              
Change in receivables and advance premiums 147
 (7) (8)  (55) (91) 42
 
Increase in deferred policy acquisition costs (241) (225) (404) 
Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs (1,504) (1,468) (1,447) 
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs 1,245
 1,132
 1,141
 
Increase in policy liabilities 3,524
 3,614
 6,806
  2,343
 2,890
 3,331
 
Change in income tax liabilities (36) 123
 993
  64
 (1,240) (93) 
Realized investment (gains) losses (140) (215) (399)  430
 151
 14
 
Other, net 989
(1) 
 309
 401
  571
 150
 340
(1) 
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 6,776
 6,550
 10,547
  6,014
 6,128
 5,987
 
Cash flows from investing activities:              
Proceeds from investments sold or matured:              
Securities available for sale:       
Fixed maturities sold 3,224
 4,178
 9,631
 
Fixed maturities matured or called 1,132
 1,001
 2,907
 
Perpetual securities sold 0
 0
 264
 
Perpetual securities matured or called 647
 203
 256
 
Equity securities sold 1
 0
 0
 
Securities held to maturity:       
Fixed maturities matured or called 766
 8,475
 6,515
 
Available-for-sale fixed maturity securities 7,888
 4,680
 6,723
 
Equity securities 429
 902
 350
 
Held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities 1,670
 2,212
 1,399
 
Other investments - loan receivables 936
 303
 90
 
Costs of investments acquired:              
Available-for-sale fixed maturities acquired (6,507) (10,978) (22,967) 
Available-for-sale equity securities acquired (454) (5) 0
 
Held-to-maturity fixed maturities acquired 0
 (3,564) (6,756) 
Other investments, net (70) 272
 (319) 
Purchase of subsidiary (40) 0
 0
 
Available-for-sale fixed maturity securities (9,086) (9,867) (10,890) 
Equity securities (440) (446) (1,079) 
Other investments - loan receivables (4,848) (2,115) (1,110) 
Other investments, excluding loan receivables, net (414) (206) (98) 
Settlement of derivatives, net (2,119) (636) (1,624)  (241) (621) 1,252
 
Cash received (pledged or returned) as collateral, net (1,391) (3,217) 1,037
  348
 (205) (416) 
Other, net (86) 30
 (35)  176
 (68) (76) 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities (4,897) (4,241) (11,091)  (3,582) (5,431) (3,855) 
Cash flows from financing activities:              
Purchases of treasury stock (1,315) (1,210) (813)  (1,301) (1,351) (1,422) 
Proceeds from borrowings 998
 750
 700
  1,020
 1,040
 986
 
Principal payments under debt obligations (1,272) (335) 0
  (550) (1,161) (610) 
Dividends paid to shareholders (656) (654) (635)  (793) (661) (658) 
Change in investment-type contracts, net 256
 1,253
 1,790
  (31) 35
 159
 
Treasury stock reissued 36
 33
 88
  58
 33
 46
 
Other, net (234)
(1) 
 16
 6
  (19) 0
 (120)
(1) 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (2,187) (147) 1,136
  (1,616) (2,065) (1,619) 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 0
 (47) (90)  30
 0
 (4) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents (308) 2,115
 502
  846
 (1,368) 509
 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 4,658
 2,543
 2,041
  3,491
 4,859
 4,350
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $4,350
 $4,658
 $2,543
  $4,337
 $3,491
 $4,859
 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:              
Income taxes paid $996
 $1,416
 $754
  $998
 $780
 $1,526
 
Interest paid 236
 241
 210
  181
 196
 211
 
Noncash interest 53

 76
 82
  41

 44
 57
 
Impairment losses included in realized investment losses 153
 31
 199
  81
 37
 85
 
Noncash financing activities:              
Capital lease obligations 6
 9
 0
  11
 12
 1
 
Treasury stock issued for:              
Associate stock bonus 35
 35
 36
  7
 29
 30
 
Shareholder dividend reinvestment 26
 26
 25
  8
 29
 27
 
Share-based compensation grants 3
 4
 4
  2
 1
 4
 
(1) Operating activities excludes and financing activities includes a cash outflow of $230$137 in 2016 for the make-whole paymentpayments associated with the early extinguishment of debt
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


8894




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business
Aflac Incorporated (the Parent Company) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) primarily sell supplemental health and life insurance in the United States and Japan. The Company's insurance business is marketed and administered through American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (Aflac), which operates in the United States (Aflac U.S.) and, as a brancheffective April 1, 2018, through Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. in Japan (Aflac Japan). Prior to April 1, 2018, the Company's insurance business was marketed in Japan as a branch of Aflac. American Family Life Assurance Company of New York (Aflac New York) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Aflac. Most of Aflac's policies are individually underwritten and marketed through independent agents. Additionally, Aflac U.S. markets and administers group products through Continental American Insurance Company (CAIC), branded as Aflac Group Insurance. OurThe Company's insurance operations in the United States and our branch in Japan service the two markets for ourthe Company's insurance business. Aflac Japan's revenues, including realized gains and losses on its investment portfolio, accounted for 70% of the Company's total revenues in 2015,2018, compared with 72%70% in 20142017 and 74%71% in 2013.2016. The percentage of the Company's total assets attributable to Aflac Japan was 84% at December 31, 2018, compared with 83% at December 31, 2015, compared with 82% at December 31, 2014.2017.


Basis of Presentation
We prepare ourThe Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)(U.S. GAAP). These principles are established primarily by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). In these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, references to U.S. GAAP issued by the FASB are derived from the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (ASC). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires usthe Company to make estimates based on currently available information when recording transactions resulting from business operations based on currently available information.operations. The most significant items on ourthe Company's balance sheet that involve a greater degree of accounting estimates and actuarial determinations subject to changes in the future are the valuation of investments and derivatives, deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC), liabilities for future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims, and income taxes. These accounting estimates and actuarial determinations are sensitive to market conditions, investment yields, mortality, morbidity, commission and other acquisition expenses, and terminations by policyholders. As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates will be revised and reflected in operating results. Although some variability is inherent in these estimates, we believethe Company believes the amounts provided are adequate.


The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent Company, its subsidiaries, and those entities required to be consolidated under applicable accounting standards. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.


Significant Accounting Policies


Translation of Foreign Currencies:Currency Translation: The functional currency of Aflac Japan's insurance operationsJapan is the Japanese yen. We translate ourThe Company translates its yen-denominated financial statement accounts into U.S. dollars as follows. Assets and liabilities are translated at end-of-period exchange rates. Realized gains and losses on security transactions are translated at the exchange rate on the trade date of each transaction. Other revenues, expenses, and cash flows are translated using average exchange rates for the period. The resulting currency translation adjustments are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. We includeThe Company includes in earnings the realized currency exchange gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions.


Prior to October 1, 2013, Aflac Japan maintained an investment portfolio of U.S. dollar-denominated securities on behalf of Aflac U.S., which served as an economic currency hedge of a portion of our investment in Aflac Japan. The functional currency for these investments was the U.S. dollar. The related investment income and realized/unrealized investment gains and losses were denominated in U.S. dollars. Since the functional currency of this portfolio was the U.S. dollar, there was no translation adjustment to record in other comprehensive income for these investments when the yen/dollar exchange rate changed. The foreign exchange gains and losses related to this portfolio continue to be taxable in Japan and the U.S. when the securities matured or were sold. Until maturity or sale, deferred tax expense or benefit associated with the foreign exchange gains or losses is recognized in income tax expense on other comprehensive income. As of October 1, 2013, these investments were transferred into the Aflac Japan investment portfolio. These investments began to have remeasurement and translation effects recorded in other comprehensive income in the fourth quarter of 2013.


89



We haveParent Company has designated a majority of the Parent Company'sits yen-denominated liabilities (Samurai and Uridashi notes(notes payable and yen-denominated loans) as non-derivative hedges and designatedfrom time-to-time may designate certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedges of the foreign currency exposure of ourthe Company's net investment in Aflac Japan. Outstanding principal and related accrued interest on these Parent Company liabilities and the fair value of these derivatives are translated into U.S. dollars at end-of-period exchange rates. Currency translation adjustments and changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recorded as unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) in other comprehensive income and are included in accumulated other comprehensive income.


Insurance Revenue and Expense Recognition: The Substantially all of the supplemental health and life insurance policies we issuethe Company issues are classified as long-duration contracts. The contract provisions generally cannot be

95


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


changed or canceled during the contract period; however, wethe Company may adjust premiums for supplemental health policies issued in the United States within prescribed guidelines and with the approval of state insurance regulatory authorities.


Insurance premiums for most of the Company's health and life policies, including cancer, accident, hospital, critical illness, dental, vision, term life, whole life, long-term care and disability, are recognized ratably as earned incomerevenue over the premium paymentpremium-paying periods of the policies.contracts when due from policyholders. When revenues are reported, the related amounts of benefits and expenses are charged against such revenues, so that profits are recognized in proportion to premium revenues during the period the policies are expected to remain in force. This association is accomplished by means of annual additions to the liability for future policy benefits and the deferral and subsequent amortization of policy acquisition costs.


Premiums from the Company's products with limited-pay features, including term life, whole life, WAYS, and child endowment, are collected over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided. Premiums for these products are recognized ratablyas revenue over the scheduled premium payment period. Atpremium-paying periods of the policyholder's option, customers can also pay discounted advanced premiums for certain of these products. Advanced premiums are deferred and recognized ratably over the regularly scheduled premium payment period. For the Company's limited-pay products, anycontracts when due from policyholders. Any gross premium in excess of the net premium is deferred during the scheduled premium payment period and recorded in earnings, such that profits are recognized into benefits in a constant relationship with insurance in force. Benefits are recorded as an expense when they are incurred. A liability for future policy benefits is recorded when premiums are recognized using the net premium method.


At the policyholder's option, customers can also pay discounted advanced premiums for certain of the Company's products. Advanced premiums are deferred and recognized when due from policyholders over the regularly scheduled premium payment period.

The calculation of deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC)DAC and the liability for future policy benefits requires the use of estimates based on sound actuarial valuation techniques. For new policy issues, we review ourthe Company reviews its actuarial assumptions and deferrable acquisition costs each year and reviserevises them when necessary to more closely reflect recent experience and studies of actual acquisition costs. For policies in force, we evaluatethe Company evaluates DAC by major product groupings to determine that they are recoverable from future revenues, and any amounts determined not to be recoverable are charged against net earnings. We haveThe Company has not had any material charges to earnings for DAC that was determined not to be recoverable in any of the years presented in this Form 10-K.


Advertising expense is reported as incurred in insurance expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings.


Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, money market instruments, and other debt instruments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased.


Investments: Our The Company's debt securities consist of fixed-maturityfixed maturity securities, which are classified as either held to maturity or available for sale. Securities classified as held to maturity are securities that we havethe Company has the ability and intent to hold to maturity or redemption and are carried at amortized cost. All other fixed-maturityfixed maturity debt securities, our perpetual securities and our equity securities are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value. If the fair value is higher than the amortized cost for debt and perpetual securities, or the purchase cost for equity securities, the excess is an unrealized gain, and if lower than cost, the difference is an unrealized loss. The net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, plus the unamortized unrealized gains and losses on debt securities transferred to the held-to-maturity portfolio, less related deferred income taxes, are recorded through other comprehensive income and included in accumulated other comprehensive income.


Amortized cost of debt and perpetual securities is based on ourthe Company's purchase price adjusted for accrual of discount, or amortization of premium, and recognition of impairment charges, if any. The amortized cost of debt and perpetual securities we purchasethe Company purchases at a discount or premium will equal the face or par value at maturity or the call date, if applicable. Interest is reported as income when earned and is adjusted for amortization of any premium or discount.


We haveThe Company has investments in equity securities which are carried at fair value. Effective January 1, 2018 upon the adoption of new accounting guidance, changes in fair value of equity securities are recorded in earnings as a component of realized investment gains and losses. Prior to January 1, 2018, equity securities were carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, less related deferred income taxes, recorded in other comprehensive income and included in accumulated other comprehensive income.

The Company has investments in variable interest entities (VIEs). Criteria for evaluating VIEs for consolidation focuses on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. We areThe Company is the primary beneficiary of certain VIEs.VIEs, and therefore consolidates these entities in its financial statements. While the consolidated VIEs generally operate within a defined set of contractual


9096




documents,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


terms, there are certain powers that are retained by usthe Company that are considered significant in ourthe conclusion that we arethe Company is the primary beneficiary. These powers vary by structure but generally include the initial selection of the underlying collateral or, for collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), the reference credits to include in the structure;collateral; the ability to obtain the underlying collateral in the event of default; and, the ability to appoint or dismiss key parties in the structure. In particular, ourthe Company's powers surrounding the underlying collateral were considered to be the most significant powers sincebecause those most significantly impact the economics of the VIE. We haveThe Company has no obligation to provide any continuing financial support to any of the entities in which we areit is the primary beneficiary. OurThe Company's maximum loss is limited to ourits original investment. Neither wethe Company nor any of ourits creditors have the ability to obtain the underlying collateral, nor do wedoes the Company have control over the instruments held in the VIEs, unless there is an event of default. For those entities where we arethe Company is the primary beneficiary, the consolidated entity's assets consolidated are fixed-maturity securities, perpetualsegregated on the balance sheet by the caption "consolidated variable interest entities," and consist of fixed maturity securities, equity securities, loan receivables, limited partnerships and derivative instruments; collateral is reported separately under the captions fixed maturities- and perpetual securities- consolidated variable interest entities on our balance sheet.instruments.


For the mortgage- and asset-backed securities held in ourthe Company's fixed maturitiesmaturity portfolio, we recognizethe Company recognizes income using a constant effective yield, which is based on anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When estimates of prepayments change, the effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date and anticipated future payments. The net investment in mortgage- and asset-backed securities is adjusted to the amount that would have existed had the new effective yield been applied at the time of acquisition. This adjustment is reflected in net investment income.


We useThe Company uses the specific identification method to determine the gain or loss from securities transactions and report the realized gain or loss in the consolidated statements of earnings. Securities transactions are accounted for based on values as of the trade date of the transaction.


An investment in a fixed maturity perpetual security or equity security is impaired if the fair value falls below book value. Weamortized cost. The Company regularly review our entire investmentreviews its fixed maturity security investments portfolio for declines in fair value. OurThe Company's fixed maturities and investment-grade perpetual securitiesmaturity security investments are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment using ourits debt impairment model. OurThe Company's debt impairment model focuses on the ultimate collection of the cash flows from our investments.its investments and whether the Company has the intent to sell or if it is more likely than not the Company would be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost. The determination of the amount of impairments under this model is based upon ourthe Company's periodic evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective securities. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.
When determining the Company's intention to sell a security prior to recovery of its fair value to amortized cost, the Company evaluates facts and circumstances such as, but not limited to, future cash flow needs, decisions to reposition its security portfolio, and risk profile of individual investment holdings. The Company performs ongoing analyses of its liquidity needs, which includes cash flow testing of its policy liabilities, debt maturities, projected dividend payments, and other cash flow and liquidity needs.

The determination of whether an impairment in value of our debtthe Company's fixed maturity securities is other than temporary is based largely on ourthe Company's evaluation of the issuer's creditworthiness. WeThe Company must apply considerable judgment in determining the likelihood of the securityits fixed maturity securities recovering in value while we own it.value. Factors that may influence this include the overall level of interest rates, credit spreads, the credit quality of the underlying issuer, and other factors. This process requires consideration of risks which can be controlled to a certain extent, such as credit risk, and risks which cannot be controlled, such as interest rate risk and foreign currency risk.

If, after monitoring and analyses, management believes that fair value will not recover to amortized cost, prior to the disposal of the security, we recognizeCompany recognizes an other-than-temporary impairment of the security. Once a security is considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the impairment loss is separated into two separate components: the portion of the impairment related to credit and the portion of the impairment related to factors other than credit. We recognizeThe Company recognizes a charge to earnings for the credit-related portion of other-than-temporary impairments. Impairments related to factors other than credit are charged to earnings in the event we intendthe Company intends to sell the security prior to the recovery of its amortized cost or if it is more likely than not that wethe Company would be required to dispose of the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost; otherwise, non-credit-related other-than-temporary impairments are charged to other comprehensive income.


Our investments in perpetual securities that are rated below investment gradeThe Company lends fixed maturity and public equity securities are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment under our equity impairment model. Our equity impairment model focuses on the severity of a security's decline in fair value coupled with the length of time the fair value of the security has been below amortized cost and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. For equity securities that have declines in value that are deemed to be temporary, we make an assertion as to our ability and intent to retain the security until recovery. Once identified, these equity securities are restricted from trading unless authorized based upon events that could not have been foreseen at the time we asserted our ability and intent to retain the security until recovery.

If management believes that the equity security will not recover prior to the disposal of the security, we recognize an other-than-temporary impairment of the security. Once an equity security is considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired, its fair value on that date becomes the new cost basis and the impairment loss is recognized in earnings.


91



We lend fixed-maturity securities to financial institutions in short-term security lendingsecurity-lending transactions. These securities continue to be carried as investment assets on ourthe Company's balance sheet during the terms of the loans and are not reported as sales. We receiveThe Company receives cash or other securities as collateral for such loans. For loans involving unrestricted cash or securities as collateral, the collateral is reported as an asset with a corresponding liability for the return of the collateral. For loans where the Company receives as collateral securities that the Company is not permitted to sell or repledge, the collateral is not reported as an asset.


97


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data



Other investments include policytransitional real estate loans (TREs), commercial mortgage loans (CMLs), middle market loans (MMLs), policy loans, limited partnerships, and other short-term investments with maturities at the time of purchase of one year or less, but greater than 90 days, at the time of purchasedays. The Company's investments in TREs, CMLs, and are stated at amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value. We invest in middle market loans through participation rights thatMMLs are accounted for as loan receivables and are recorded at amortized cost on the acquisition date. Since we haveThe Company has the intent and ability to hold these loan receivables for the foreseeable future or until they mature and therefore, they are considered held for investment and are carried at adjusted amortized cost in the other investments line on ourin its consolidated balance sheets. The adjusted amortized cost of the loan receivables reflects allowances for expected incurred losses estimated based on past events and current economic conditions as of each reporting date. Limited partnership investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company reports its portion of partnership earnings as a component of net investment income in its consolidated statements of earnings. The underlying investments held by the Company’s limited partnerships primarily consist of private equity and real estate. Short-term investments are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.


Derivatives and Hedging: Freestanding derivative instruments are reported in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value and are reported in other assets and other liabilities, with changes in value reported in earnings and/or other comprehensive income. These freestanding derivatives are interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps, credit default swaps (CDSs), foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options, and options onforeign currency swaps, interest rate swaps, (or interest rate swaptions). Interest rateswaptions, and, foreign currencyin prior year periods, credit default swaps are used within VIEs to hedge the risk arising from interest rate and currency exchange risk, while the CDSs are used to increase the yield and improve the diversification of the portfolio.(CDSs). Foreign currency forwards and options are used in hedging foreign exchange risk on U.S. dollar-denominated securitiesinvestments in Aflac Japan's portfolio. Foreign currency forwards and options are also used to economically hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in yen. Interest rate swaps are used toyen and hedge the variability of interest cash flows associated with our variable interest rate notes.Company's long term exposure to a weakening yen. Cross-currency interest rate swaps, also referred to as foreign currency swaps, are used to economically convert certain U.S. dollar-denominated note obligations into yen-denominated principal and interest obligations. Foreign currency swaps are used within special-purpose entities, including VIEs where the Company is the primary beneficiary, to hedge the risk arising from interest rate and currency exchange risk. Interest rate swaps are used to economically hedge interest rate fluctuations in certain variable-rate investments. Interest rate swaptions, have beenwhich are options to enter into interest rate swaps, are used to hedge interest rate risk forfluctuations on certain U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities. We dosecurities in Aflac Japan's portfolio. The Company does not use derivatives for trading purposes, nor do wedoes the Company engage in leveraged derivative transactions.


From time to time, we purchasethe Company purchases certain investments that contain an embedded derivative. We assessThe Company assesses whether this embedded derivative is clearly and closely related to the asset that serves as its host contract. If we deemthe Company deems that the embedded derivative's terms are not clearly and closely related to the host contract, and a separate instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the derivative is separated from that contract, held at fair value, and reported with the host instrument in the consolidated balance sheet, with changes in fair value reported in earnings. If we havethe Company has elected the fair value option, the embedded derivative is not bifurcated, and the entire investment is held at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings.

See Note 5 for a discussion on how the Company determines the fair value of its derivatives. Accruals on derivatives are typically recorded in accrued investment income or within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
For those relationships where we seek
To qualify for hedge accounting wetreatment, a derivative must be highly effective in mitigating the designated risk attributable to the hedged item. At the inception of hedging relationships the Company formally documentdocuments all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as ourits risk-management objectives and strategies for undertaking variousthe respective hedging relationship, and the methodology that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the hedge transactions. Thisrelationship at and subsequent to hedge inception. The Company documents the designation of each hedge as either (i) a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability or the hedge of a forecasted transaction ("cash flow hedge"); (ii) a hedge of the estimated fair value of a recognized asset or liability ("fair value hedge"); or (iii) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. The documentation process includes linking derivatives and non-derivative financial instruments that are designated as hedges to specific assets or groups of assets or liabilities onin the balance sheet. We also assess, both atstatement of financial position or to specific forecasted transactions and defining the effectiveness testing methods to be used. At the hedge inception and on an ongoing quarterly basis, the Company also formally assesses whether the derivatives and non-derivative financial instruments used in hedging activities have been, and are expected to continue to be, highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged items.their designated risk. Hedge effectiveness is assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods. The assessment of hedge effectiveness determines the accounting treatment of noncash changes in fair value.

ChangesFor assessing hedge effectiveness, qualitative methods may include the comparison of critical terms of the derivative to the hedged item, and quantitative methods may include regression, dollar offset, or other statistical analysis of changes in the fair value of any of our derivativesor cash flows associated with the hedge relationship. For derivative instruments that are designated and

98


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


qualify as cash flow hedges, are recorded inthe gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income as long as they(loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. In cash flow hedges, all components of each derivative's gain or loss are deemed effective. Anyincluded in the assessment of hedge ineffectiveness is recorded immediately in current period earnings within derivativeeffectiveness and other gains (losses). Periodic derivative net coupon settlements are recorded in the line item of the consolidated statements of earnings in which the cash flows of the hedged item are recorded.
Changes in the estimated fair value ofFor derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, including amounts measured as ineffectiveness, and changes in the estimated fair value ofgain or loss on the hedged item and the portion of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of effectiveness are recorded in the line item of the consolidated statements of earnings in which gain or loss on the hedged item is recorded. When assessing the effectiveness of the Company's fair value hedges, the Company excludes the changes in fair value related to the designated risk being hedged, are reporteddifference between the spot and the forward rate on its foreign currency forwards and the time value of foreign exchange options and interest rate swaptions.
For hedges of the Company's net investment in current earnings within derivative and other gains (losses).

We haveAflac Japan, the Company has designated the majority of the Parent Company's yen-denominated liabilities (Samurai and Uridashi notes(notes payable and yen-denominated loans) as non-derivative hedgeshedging instruments and designatedfrom time to time may designate certain derivatives as hedges of the foreign currency exposure to ourforwards and options as derivative hedging instruments. The Company makes its net investment in Aflac Japan. Athedge designation at the beginning of each quarter, we make ourquarter. For assessing hedge effectiveness of net investment hedge designation. Ifhedges, if the total of the designated Parent Company non-derivative and derivatives notional is equal to or less than ourits net investment in Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective. If the hedge is effective, and the related exchange effect on the yen-denominated

92



liabilities is reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. For derivative hedging instruments designated as net investment hedges, Aflac follows the forward-rate method. According to that method, all changes in fair value, including changes related to the forward-rate component of foreign currency forward contracts and the change in estimated fairtime value of the derivativesforeign currency options, are reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. Should these designated net investment hedge positions exceed ourthe Company's net investment in Aflac Japan, the foreign exchange effect on the portion that exceeds ourits investment in Aflac Japan would be recognized in current earnings within derivative and other gains (losses).

The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when (1) it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated cash flows or fair value of a hedged item; (2) the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument; or (3) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised.
Derivatives thatWhen hedge accounting is discontinued on a cash flow hedge or fair value hedge, the derivative is carried in the consolidated balance sheets at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in current period earnings. For discontinued cash flow hedges, including those where the derivative is sold, terminated or exercised, amounts previously deferred in other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified into earnings when earnings are impacted by the cash flow of the hedged item.
If a derivative is not designated as hedges are carried atan accounting hedge or its use in managing risk does not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the estimated fair value with all changes in fair value recorded in current period earningsof the derivative are generally reported within derivative and other gains (losses), which is a component of realized investment gains (losses). We include theThe fluctuations in estimated fair value of all freestanding derivatives that have not been designated for hedge accounting can result in either other assets or other liabilities on the balance sheet.volatility in net earnings.


We receiveThe Company receives and pledgepledges cash or other securities as collateral on open derivative positions. Cash received as collateral is reported as an asset with a corresponding liability for the return of the collateral. Cash pledged as collateral is recorded as a reduction to cash, and a corresponding receivable is recognized for the return of the cash collateral. WeThe Company generally can repledge or resell collateral obtained by us,from counterparties, although we dothe Company does not typically exercise such rights. Securities received as collateral are not recognized unless we werethe Company was to exercise ourits right to sell that collateral or exercise remedies on that collateral upon a counterparty default. Securities that we havethe Company has pledged as collateral continue to be carried as investment assets on ourits balance sheet.


Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs: Certain direct and incremental costs of acquiring new business are deferred and amortized with interest over the premium payment periods in proportion to the ratio of annual premium income to total anticipated premium income. Anticipated premium income is estimated by using the same mortality, persistency and interest assumptions used in computing liabilities for future policy benefits. In this manner, the related acquisition expenses are matched with revenues. Deferred costs include the excess of current-year commissions over ultimate renewal-year commissions and certain incremental direct policy issue, underwriting and sales expenses. All of these incremental costs are directly related to successful policy acquisition.



99


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


For some products, policyholders can elect to modify product benefits, features, rights or coverages by exchanging a contract for a new contract or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to a contract, or by the election of a feature or coverage within a contract. These transactions are known as internal replacements. The Company performs a two-stage analysis of the internal replacements to determine if the modification is substantive to the base policy. The stages of evaluation are as follows: 1) determine if the modification is integrated with the base policy, and 2) if it is integrated, determine if the resulting contract is substantially changed.
For internal replacement transactions where the resulting contract is substantially unchanged, the policy is accounted for as a continuation of the replaced contract. Unamortized deferred acquisition costs from the original policy continue to be amortized over the expected life of the new policy, and the costs of replacing the policy are accounted for as policy maintenance costs and expensed as incurred. InternalExamples include conversions of same age bands, certain family coverage changes, pricing era changes (decrease), and ordinary life becomes reduced paid-up and certain reinstatements.
An internal replacement transactionstransaction that resultresults in a policy that is not substantially unchanged arechanged is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original policy and the issuance of a new policy. Unamortized deferred acquisition costs on the original policy that was replaced are immediately expensed, and the costs of acquiring the new policy are capitalized and amortized in accordance with ourthe Company's accounting policies for deferred acquisition costs. Further, the policy reserves are evaluated based on the new policy features, and any change (up or down) necessary is recognized at the date of contract change/modification. Examples include conversions to higher age bands, certain family coverage changes, pricing era changes (increase), lapse & re-issue, certain reinstatements and certain other contract conversions.
We measureRiders can be considered internal replacements that are either integrated or non-integrated resulting in either substantially changed or substantially unchanged treatment. Riders are evaluated based on the specific facts and circumstances of the rider and are considered an expansion of the existing benefits with additional premium required. Non-integrated riders to existing contracts do not change the Company's profit expectations for the related products and are treated as a new policy establishment for incremental coverage.
The Company measures the recoverability of DAC and the adequacy of ourits policy reserves annually by performing gross premium valuations on ourits business. Our testing indicates that our DAC is recoverable and our policy liabilities are adequate. (See the following discussion for further information regarding policy liabilities.reserves.)

Policy Liabilities: Future policy benefits represent claims that are expected to occur in the future and are computed byfollowing a net level premium method using estimated future investment yields, persistency and recognized morbidity and mortality tables modified to reflect ourthe Company's experience, including a provision for adverse deviation. These assumptions are generally established and considered locked at policy inception. These assumptions may only be unlocked in certain circumstances based on the time a policy is issued.results of periodic DAC recoverability and premium deficiency testing.
Unpaid policy claims are estimates computed on an undiscounted basis using statistical analyses of historical claims experience adjusted for current trends and changed conditions. The ultimate liability may vary significantly from such estimates. WeThe Company regularly adjustadjusts these estimates as new claims experience emerges and reflectreflects the changes in operating results in the year such adjustments are made.


Other policy liabilities consist primarily of discounted advance premiums on deposit from policyholders in conjunction with their purchase of certain Aflac Japan limited-pay insurance products. These advanced premiums are deferred upon collection and recognized as premium revenue over the contractual premium payment period.


For internal replacements that are determined to not be substantially unchanged, policy liabilities related to the original policy that was replaced are immediately released, and policy liabilities are established for the new insurance contract.contract; however, for internal replacements that are considered substantially unchanged, no changes to the reserves are recognized.


93



Reinsurance: We enter The Company enters into reinsurance agreements with other companies in the normal course of business. For each of our reinsurance agreements, we determineagreement, the Company determines if the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Reinsurance premiums and benefits paid or provided are accounted for on bases consistent with those used in accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts. Premiums, benefits and DAC are reported net of insurance ceded. See Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


Income Taxes:Income tax provisions are generally based on pretax earnings reported for financial statement purposes, which differ from those amounts used in preparing ourthe Company's income tax returns. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of assets and

100


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


liabilities, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which we expectthe Company expects the temporary differences to reverse. We recordThe Company records deferred tax assets for tax positions taken based on ourits assessment of whether the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that an amount will not be realized.


As discussed in the Translation of Foreign Currencies section above, Aflac Japan maintains certain dollar-denominated investments that, prior to October 1, 2013, did not have any foreign currency translation adjustments recognized in other comprehensive income. However, the deferred tax expense or benefit associated with foreign exchange gains or losses on these investments is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until the securities mature or are sold. Total income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive income (loss) included a deferred tax expense of $614 million in 2013 for these U.S. dollar-denominated investments. Excluding these amounts from total taxes on other comprehensive income would result in an effective income tax rate on pretax other comprehensive income (loss) of 31% in 2013.

Policyholder Protection Corporation and State Guaranty Association Assessments: In Japan, the government has required the insurance industry to contribute to a policyholder protection corporation. We recognizeThe Company recognizes a charge for ourits estimated share of the industry's obligation once it is determinable. We reviewThe Company reviews the estimated liability for policyholder protection corporation contributions on an annual basis and reportreports any adjustments in Aflac Japan's expenses.


In the United States, each state has a guaranty association that supports insolvent insurers operating in those states. To date, our stateSee Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the guaranty associationfund assessments have not been material.charged to the Company.


Treasury Stock: Treasury stock is reflected as a reduction of shareholders' equity at cost. We useThe Company uses the weighted-average purchase cost to determine the cost of treasury stock that is reissued. We includeThe Company includes any gains and losses in additional paid-in capital when treasury stock is reissued.


Share-Based Compensation: We measureThe Company measures compensation cost related to ourits share-based payment transactions at fair value on the grant date, and we recognizethe Company recognizes those costs in the financial statements over the vesting period during which the employee provides service in exchange for the award. The Company has formalized its entity-wide accounting policy election to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest and the corresponding forfeitures.


Earnings Per Share: We computeThe Company computes basic earnings per share (EPS) by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of unrestricted shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period plus the shares representing the dilutive effect of share-based awards.


Stock Split: On February 13, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Parent Company declared a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend payable on March 16, 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 2, 2018. The stock split was payable in the form of one additional common stock share for every share of common stock held. All equity and share-based data, including the number of shares outstanding and per share amounts, have been adjusted to reflect the stock split for all periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to prior-year amounts to conform to current-year reporting classifications. These reclassifications had no impact on net earnings or total shareholders' equity.


Perpetual securities have been reclassified in prior periods from a separate line item to fixed maturity securities to conform to current period reporting classifications. This reclassification had no impact on net earnings or total shareholder’s equity.

New Accounting Pronouncements


Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements


Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items - Simplifying income statement presentation by eliminating the concept of extraordinary items: In January 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance that eliminates from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained. The amendments in this updated guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

94101





Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Receivables - Troubled debt restructurings by creditors - classification of certain government-guaranteed mortgage loans upon foreclosure: In August 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance for troubled debt restructurings affecting creditors that hold government guaranteed mortgage loans. The guidance requires that a mortgage loan be derecognized and a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if certain conditions are met. We adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.


Transfers and Servicing, Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures: In June 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance for repurchase agreement and security lending transactions to change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions and linked repurchase financings to be accounted for as secured borrowings, consistent with the accounting for other repurchase agreements. The amendments also require new disclosures to increase transparency about the types of collateral pledged in repurchase agreements and similar transactions accounted for as secured borrowings. We adopted accounting changes for the new guidance as of January 1, 2015, and adopted the required disclosures as of April 1, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2018-16 Derivatives and Hedging Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes
In October 2018, the FASB issued amendments to permit use of the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815 in addition to the Treasury obligations of the U.S. government (UST), the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) swap rate, the OIS rate based on the Fed Funds Effective Rate, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Rate.Early adopted as of October 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
ASU 2018-03
Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments - Overall Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In February 2018, the FASB issued amendments to clarify certain aspects of the guidance issued in the original Financial Instruments - Overall - Recognition and Measurement pronouncement summarized below. Specifically, for entities who have chosen the measurement alternative approach for equity securities without readily determinable fair values, the amendments clarify that entities may change from a measurement alternative approach to a fair value method through an irrevocable election that would apply to a specific equity security and all identical or similar investments of the same issuer; entities should use an observable price at the date of the transaction rather than reporting date for the measurement alternative calculation; and insurance companies should use a prospective transition method when applying the measurement alternative.
Early adopted as of January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2018-02
Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
In February 2018, the FASB issued amendments which allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to retained earnings of the effects of the change in the U.S. federal income tax rate resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act) on the gross deferred tax amounts and the corresponding valuation allowances related to items remaining in AOCI. The amendments eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act and also require certain disclosures about the reclassified tax effects.Early adopted as of January 1, 2018
The amounts reclassified from
AOCI to retained earnings include the income tax effects of the change in the federal corporate tax rate enacted by the Tax Act. The Company’s policy is to follow the portfolio approach for releasing income tax effects from AOCI. The adoption of this guidance resulted in an increase to beginning 2018 AOCI of $374 million with a corresponding decrease to beginning 2018 retained earnings as of January 1, 2018.
Receivables - Troubled debt restructurings by creditors - Reclassification of residential real estate collateralized consumer mortgage loans upon foreclosure: In January 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance for troubled debt restructurings clarifying when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and when a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan. We adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

102
Presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists: In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance to amend the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The new guidance states that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. However, to the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets.  We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Derivatives and hedging: In July 2013, the FASB issued an update which allows entities to use the Federal Funds Effective Swap Rate, also referred to as the Overnight Index Swap Rate (OIS), as a benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes. This update reflects the evolution of market hedging practices and is intended to provide more flexibility for hedge accounting purposes. We adopted this guidance in the third quarter of 2013 on a prospective basis for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after the effective date of July 17, 2013. The adoption of the guidance had no impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income: In February 2013, the FASB issued guidance that requires reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income to net income to be presented in statements where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented or in the footnotes to the financial statements. Additionally, the amendment requires cross-referencing to other disclosures currently required for other reclassification items. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2013. The adoption of this guidance impacted our financial statement disclosures, but it did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities: In December 2011, the FASB issued guidance to amend the disclosure requirements about offsetting assets and liabilities. The new guidance clarifies the FASB's intent concerning the application of existing offsetting disclosure requirements. Entities are required to disclose gross and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions when those activities are subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The scope of this guidance was clarified and revised in January 2013 to apply to derivatives, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowing and securities lending arrangements. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2013. The adoption of this guidance impacted our financial statement disclosures, but it did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.


95




Fees paid to the federal government by health insurers: In July 2011, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for fees owed by health insurers as mandated by the Patient Protection


StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2017-12
Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
In August 2017, the FASB issued guidance which improves and simplifies the accounting rules around hedge accounting and creates more transparency around how economic results are presented in financial statements. Issues addressed in this new guidance include: 1) risk component hedging, 2) accounting for the hedged item in fair value hedges of interest rate risk, 3) recognition and presentation of the effects of hedging instruments, and 4) amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.Early adopted as of October 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2017-09 Compensation - Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting
In May 2017, the FASB issued amendments to provide guidance clarifying when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. An entity should apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions or classification of the award (as an equity instrument or liability instrument) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions of the award.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2017-08
Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs: Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities

In March 2017, the FASB issued amendments to shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount.Early adopted as of July 1, 2018
The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

ASU 2017-07
Compensation - Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
In March 2017, the FASB issued amendments requiring that an employer report the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. If a separate line item or items are used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be appropriately described. If a separate line item or items are not used, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. The amendments in this update also allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

103




StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2017-05
Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets: Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets
In February 2017, the FASB issued amendments that clarify the scope and accounting guidance for the derecognition of a nonfinancial asset or a financial asset that meets the definition of an "in substance nonfinancial asset." The amendments define an "in substance nonfinancial asset" and provide additional accounting guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2017-01
Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business
In January 2017, the FASB issued amendments clarifying when a set of assets and activities is a business. The amendments provide a screen to exclude transactions where substantially all the fair value of the transferred set is concentrated in a single asset, or group of similar assets, from being evaluated as a business.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-18
Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash
In November 2016, the FASB issued amendments requiring that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, statements of cash flows, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-17
Consolidation - Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control
In October 2016, the FASB issued amendments which clarify the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity (VIE) should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE.January 1, 2017The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-16
Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
In October 2016, the FASB issued amendments that require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-15 Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
In August 2016, the FASB issued amendments that provide guidance on eight specific statement of cash flow classification issues, including distributions received from equity method investees.January 1, 2018The Company elected nature of distribution for distributions received from equity method investees. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, statement of cash flows, results of operations, or disclosures.

104





StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-09
Compensation - Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments which simplify several aspects for share-based payment award transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either liability or equity, classification of taxes paid on the statement of cash flows and treatment of forfeitures.


January 1, 2017As a result of applying this requirement, the Company believes that recognition of excess tax benefits will increase volatility in its statement of operations and the Company made an entity-wide accounting policy election to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (consistent with the Company's prior policy), but the adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, statements of cash flows, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-07
Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures - Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of
Accounting
In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments which eliminate the requirement that when an investment
qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. Per the amendments, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required.
January 1, 2017The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-06
Derivatives and Hedging - Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments
In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments which clarify what steps are required when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call (put) options are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of their debt hosts, which is one of the criteria for bifurcating an embedded derivative. Consequently, when a call (put) option is contingently exercisable, an entity does not have to assess whether the event that triggers the ability to exercise a call (put) option is related to interest rates or credit risks.January 1, 2017The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-05
Derivatives and Hedging - Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting
Relationships
In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments which clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria remain intact.January 1, 2017The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

105




StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-01
Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance to address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The main provisions of this guidance require certain equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net earnings; separate presentation in other comprehensive income for changes in fair value of financial liabilities measured under the fair value option that are due to instrument-specific credit risk; and changes in disclosures associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The guidance also clarifies that entities should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset (DTA) related to available-for-sale (AFS) securities in combination with the entity's other DTAs.January 1, 2018The Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment with an increase to beginning 2018 retained earnings and a decrease to beginning 2018 AOCI of $148 million, net of taxes.
ASU 2015-16
Business Combinations - Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments
In September 2015, the FASB issued guidance requiring that an acquirer recognize adjustments to estimated amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined. In the same period’s financial statements, the acquirer is required to record income effects of the adjustments as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The acquirer is also required to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the estimated amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date.January 1, 2016The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2015-09
Financial Services - Insurance - Disclosures about Short-Duration Contracts
In May 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance requiring enhanced disclosures by all insurance entities that issue short-duration contracts. The amendments require insurance entities to disclose for annual reporting periods information about the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. The amendments also require insurance entities to disclose information about significant changes in methodologies and assumptions used to calculate the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. In addition, the amendments require insurance entities to disclose for annual and interim reporting periods a roll-forward of the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. For health insurance claims, the amendments require the disclosure of the total of incurred-but-not-reported liabilities and expected development on reported claims included in the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses.December 31, 2016The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

106




StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2015-07
Fair Value Measurement - Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)
In May 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance that removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The amendments also remove the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Rather, those disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using that practical expedient.January 1, 2016The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2015-03
Interest - Imputation of Interest - Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs
In April 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance to simplify presentation of debt issuance costs. The updated guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this amendment. In August 2015, the FASB issued updated Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff guidance pertaining to the presentation of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. The guidance states that an entity may defer and present debt issuance costs as an asset, subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement.January 1, 2016The retrospective adoption of this accounting standard resulted in a $40 million reduction to notes payable and other assets as of December 31, 2015, the earliest balance sheet date presented in the period of adoption, but did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

107




StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2015-02
Consolidation - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis
In February 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance that affects evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities (limited liability corporations and securitization structures, etc.) are VIEs, evaluation of whether fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider are a variable interest, and evaluation of the effect of fee arrangements and the effect of related parties on the determination of the primary beneficiary under the VIE model for consolidation. The updated guidance eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership. Limited partnership and similar legal entities that provide partners with either substantive kick-out rights or substantive participating rights over the general partner will now be evaluated under the voting interest model rather than the VIE model for consolidation. In situations where no single party has a controlling financial interest in a VIE, the related party relationships under common control should be considered in their entirety in determining whether that common control group has a controlling financial interest in the VIE.January 1, 2016
The adoption of this guidance impacted the Company's footnote disclosures, but did not have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.

ASU 2014-16
Derivatives and Hedging - Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity
In November 2014, the FASB issued guidance to clarify how to evaluate the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The guidance also clarifies that an entity should assess the substance of the relevant terms and features when considering how to weight those terms and features.January 1, 2016
The adoption of this guidance impacted the Company's footnote disclosures, but did not have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.

ASU 2014-15
Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern - Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
In August 2014, the FASB issued this amendment that provides U.S. GAAP guidance on management’s responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and about related footnote disclosures. For each reporting period, management will be required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The new guidance requires a formal assessment of going concern by management based on criteria prescribed in the new guidance.December 31, 2016The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or disclosures and no substantial doubt currently exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

108




StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2014-12
Compensation - Stock Compensation - Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period
In June 2014, the FASB issued this amendment that provides guidance on certain share-based payment awards that require a specific performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest.January 1, 2016The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2014-09
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance that affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption

StandardDescriptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2018-20 Leases: Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors
In December 2018, the FASB issued narrow-scope improvements for lessors which 1) provide an accounting policy election for lessors to exclude amounts collected from customers for all sales (and other similar) taxes from the transaction price; 2) require lessors to exclude the costs from variable lease revenue and the associated expense when the amount of those costs is not readily determinable by the lessor; and 3) require lessors to allocate (rather than recognize) certain variable payments to the lease and nonlease components when the changes in facts and circumstances on which the variable payment is based occur. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.The Company has made an accounting policy election to exclude amounts collected from customers for all sales (and other similar) taxes from the transaction price. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities: In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance to address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The main provisions require that equity investments be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income; that changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities that are measured under the fair value option be recognized in other comprehensive income; and that entities would make the assessment of the ability to realize a deferred tax asset (DTA) related to an available-for-sale (AFS) debt security in combination with the entity's other DTAs. The amendments are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted, with the exception of the own credit provision if an entity has elected to measure a liability at fair value. We are evaluating whether the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

109
Business Combinations - Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments: In September 2015, the FASB issued guidance requiring that an acquirer recognize adjustments to estimated amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined. In the same period’s financial statements, the acquirer is required to record income effects of the adjustments as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The acquirer is also required to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the estimated amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The amendment is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Fair Value Measurement - Disclosures for investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent): In May 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance that removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The amendments also remove the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Rather, those disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using that practical expedient. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented whereby an investment for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient be removed from the fair value hierarchy in all periods presented in an entity’s financial statements. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

Financial Services - Insurance - Disclosures about Short-Duration Contracts: In May 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance requiring enhanced disclosures by all insurance entities that issue short-duration contracts. The amendments require insurance entities to disclose for annual reporting periods information about the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. The amendments also require insurance entities to disclose information about significant changes in methodologies and assumptions used to calculate the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. In addition, the amendments require insurance entities to disclose for annual and interim reporting periods a roll-forward of the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. For health insurance claims, the amendments require the disclosure of the total of incurred-but-not-reported liabilities and expected development on reported claims included in the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. The amendments are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application of the amendments is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.


96




Interest - Imputation of Interest - Simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs: In April 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance to simplify presentation of debt issuance costs. The updated guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this amendment. In August 2015, the FASB issued updated SEC Staff guidance pertaining to the presentation of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. The guidance states that an entity may defer and present debt issuance costs as an asset, subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The amendment is effective for annual periods and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Consolidation - Amendments to the consolidation analysis: In February 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance that affects evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities (limited liability corporations and securitization structures, etc.) are VIEs, evaluation of whether fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider are a variable interest, and evaluation of the effect of fee arrangements and the effect of related parties on the determination of the primary beneficiary under the VIE model for consolidation. The updated guidance eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership. Limited partnership and similar legal entities that provide partners with either substantive kick-out rights or substantive participating rights over the general partner will now be evaluated under the voting interest model rather than the VIE model for consolidation. In situations where no single party has a controlling financial interest in a VIE, the related party relationships under common control should be considered in their entirety in determining whether that common control group has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. The amendments in the updated guidance are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early application is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this guidance will result in a reduction to the number of our investments that meet the definition of a VIE and will also reduce the number of VIEs required to be disclosed within our financial statements. The adoption of this guidance will impact our footnote disclosures, but will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Derivatives and Hedging - Determining whether the host contract in a hybrid financial instrument issued in the form of a share is more akin to debt or equity: In November 2014, the FASB issued guidance to clarify how to evaluate the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The guidance also clarifies that an entity should assess the substance of the relevant terms and features when considering how to weight those terms and features. The guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.



Compensation - Stock Compensation - Accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period: In June 2014, the FASB issued this amendment that provides guidance on certain share-based payment awards that require a specific performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

StandardDescriptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2018-17 Consolidation: Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities
In October 2018, the FASB issued targeted improvements which provide that indirect interests held through related parties under common control should be considered on a proportional basis for determining whether fees paid to decision makers and service providers are variable interests. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
ASU 2018-15
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract
In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments to align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.

The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

ASU 2018-14
Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans
In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments to modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. Accordingly, six disclosure requirements were removed, two added and two clarified. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted.
The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

ASU 2018-13
Fair Value Measurement, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement
In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments to the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The amendments remove, modify, and add certain disclosures. The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted upon issuance of this Update. An entity is permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures upon issuance of this update and delay adoption of the additional disclosures until their effective date.
The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

ASU 2018-12
Financial Services - Insurance, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts

In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments that will significantly change how insurers account for long-duration contracts. The amendments will change existing recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements. Issues addressed in the new guidance include: 1) a requirement to review and, if there is a change, update assumptions for the liability for future policy benefits at least annually, and to update the discount rate assumption quarterly, 2) accounting for market risk benefits at fair value, 3) simplified amortization for deferred acquisition costs, and 4) enhanced financial statement presentation and disclosures. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application of the amendments is permitted.

The Company is thoroughly evaluating the impact of adoption and expects that the adoption will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and disclosures. The Company anticipates that the requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits will have a significant impact on its results of operations, systems, processes and controls while the requirement to update the discount rate will have a significant impact on its equity. The Company does not expect to early adopt the updated standard.



97110




Revenue from contracts with customers: In May 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance that affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date for this standard to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.



StandardDescriptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2018-11
Leases, Targeted Improvements

In July 2018, the FASB issued targeted improvements to Topic 842 Leases. The amendments in the update provide entities with an optional transition method to adopt the new leases standard by recording a cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. Additionally, the amendments provide lessors with a practical expedient to not separate nonlease components from associated lease components and instead account for those components as a single component under certain conditions. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company has elected the optional transition method. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

ASU 2018-10
Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases

In July 2018, the FASB issued guidance which clarifies, corrects errors in, or makes minor improvements to the Codification related to ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The amendments in this ASU affect narrow aspects of the guidance issued in the amendments to ASU 2016-02, including but not limited to, Residual Value Guarantees, Rate Implicit in the Lease, Lessee Reassessment of Lease Classification and Variable Lease Payments that Depend on an Index or a Rate. Amendments within this ASU follow the effective dates of Topic 842, which are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2018-01
Leases: Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842
In January 2018, the FASB issued guidance which provides an entity with the option to elect a transition practical expedient to not evaluate, under Topic 842, land easements that exist or expired before the entity's adoption of Topic 842 and that were not previously accounted for as leases under Topic 840. The amendments clarify that new or modified land easements should be evaluated under the new leases standard once an entity has adopted the new standard. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.As of December 31, 2018, the Company did not have land easements, but has elected this practical expedient as a safe harbor. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2017-04
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
In January 2017, the FASB issued amendments simplifying the subsequent measurement of goodwill. An entity is no longer required to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. Instead, the entity should perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The amendments are effective for public business entities that are SEC filers for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for any goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.


111




StandardDescriptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-13
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
In June 2016, the FASB issued amendments that require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured on an amortized cost basis to be presented net of an allowance for credit losses in order to reflect the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset(s). The measurement of expected credit losses is amended by replacing the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform about a credit loss. Credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities will continue to be measured in a manner similar to current U.S. GAAP; however, the amendments require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. Other amendments include changes to the balance sheet presentation and interest income recognition of purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination (PCD financial assets). The amendments are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Companies may early adopt this guidance as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments will be adopted following a modified-retrospective approach resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment in retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. Two exceptions to this adoption method are for PCD financial assets and debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) will have been recognized before the effective date. Loans purchased with credit deterioration accounted for under current U.S. GAAP as "purchased credit impaired" (PCI) financial assets will be classified as PCD financial assets at transition and PCD guidance will be applied prospectively. Debt securities that have experienced OTTI before the effective date will follow a prospective adoption method which allows an entity to maintain the same amortized cost basis before and after the effective date.The Company has identified certain financial instruments in scope of this guidance to include certain fixed maturity securities, loans and loan receivables and reinsurance recoverables (See Notes 3 and 7 for current balances of instruments in scope). The Company is continuing its progress towards updating its credit loss projection models and accounting systems in order to comply with the required changes in measurement of credit losses. The Company currently expects loans and loan receivables and held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities to be the asset classes most significantly impacted upon adoption of the guidance. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of adoption of this guidance on its financial position, results of operations, and disclosures.


112




StandardDescriptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-02
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance for accounting for leases. Per the amendments, lessees will be required to recognize all leases on the balance sheet with the exception of short-term leases. A lease liability will be recorded for the obligation of a lessee to make lease payments arising from a lease. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. The Company is electing to use its effective date as its date of initial application. Because the Company expects to adopt the new standard on January 1, 2019 and use the effective date as the date of initial application, financial information is not required to be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard are not required to be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients. The Company has elected the "package of practical expedients," which permits the Company not to reassess under the new standard its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. The amendments are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.The Company has identified certain operating leases in scope of this guidance to include office space and equipment leases (See Note 15). The leases within scope of this guidance will increase the Company's right-of-use assets and lease liabilities recorded on its statement of financial position by approximately $100 to $200 million. The Company estimates that the adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on its financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.


Recent accounting guidance not discussed above is not applicable, did not have, or is not expected to have a material impact to ourthe Company's business. 


2.BUSINESS SEGMENT AND FOREIGN INFORMATION
The Company consists of two reportable insurance business segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S., both of which sell supplemental health and life insurance. Operating business segments that are not individually reportable and business activities, including reinsurance retrocession activities, not included in Aflac Japan or Aflac U.S. are included in the "Other business segments""Corporate and other" category.


We doThe Company does not allocate corporate overhead expenses to business segments. We evaluateConsistent with U.S. GAAP accounting guidance for segment reporting, the Company evaluates and manage ourmanages its business segments using a financial performance measure called pretax operatingadjusted earnings. Our definition of operatingAdjusted earnings includesare adjusted revenues less benefits and adjusted expenses. The adjustments to both revenues and expenses account for certain items that cannot be predicted or that are outside management’s control. Adjusted revenues are U.S. GAAP total revenues excluding realized investment gains and losses, except for amortized hedge costs related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies. Adjusted expenses are U.S. GAAP total acquisition and operating expenses including the impact of interest cash flows from derivatives associated with notes payable but excluding any nonrecurring or other items not associated with the normal course of the Company’s insurance operations and that do not reflect Aflac’s underlying business performance. The Company excludes the following items from net earnings on an after-tax basis: realized investment gains/losses (securities transactions, impairments, and the impact of derivative and hedging activities), nonrecurring items and other non-operating income (loss). We then exclude income taxes related to operations to arrive at pretax operatingadjusted earnings. Information regarding operations by segment for the years ended December 31 follows:


98113





(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Revenues:           
Aflac Japan:           
   Net earned premiums:           
             Cancer $4,933
   $5,596
   $6,123
 
             Medical and other health 3,092
   3,770
   4,282
 
             Life insurance 4,021
   4,495
   4,577
 
   Net investment income 2,436
   2,662
   2,651
 
   Other income 31
   32
   55
 
               Total Aflac Japan 14,513
   16,555
   17,688
 
Aflac U.S.:           
   Net earned premiums:           
             Accident/disability 2,391
   2,303
   2,284
 
             Cancer 1,293
   1,279
   1,283
 
             Other health 1,395
   1,371
   1,334
 
             Life insurance 268
   258
   252
 
   Net investment income 678
   645
   632
 
   Other income 8
   3
   6
 
               Total Aflac U.S. 6,033
   5,859
   5,791
 
Other business segments 225
   43
   49
 
               Total business segment revenues 20,771
   22,457
   23,528
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (1)
 55
   171
   389
 
Corporate 282
   281
   302
 
Intercompany eliminations (201)   (248)   (308) 
Other non-operating income (loss) (35)
(2) 
  67
   28
 
           Total revenues $20,872
   $22,728
   $23,939
 

(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Revenues:           
Aflac Japan:           
   Net earned premiums:           
             Cancer $5,849
   $5,612
   $5,639
 
             Medical and other health 3,516
   3,379
   3,429
 
             Life insurance 3,397
   3,761
   4,469
 
   Net investment income, less amortized hedge costs 2,403
   2,235
   2,368
 
   Other income 41
   41
   40
 
               Total Aflac Japan 15,206
   15,028
   15,945
 
Aflac U.S.:           
   Net earned premiums:           
             Accident/disability 2,611
   2,537
   2,469
 
             Cancer 1,311
   1,308
   1,299
 
             Other health 1,508
   1,445
   1,415
 
             Life insurance 278
   273
   271
 
   Net investment income 727
   721
   703
 
   Other income 8
   5
   10
 
           Total Aflac U.S. 6,443
   6,289
   6,167
 
Corporate and other 339
   272
   275
 
           Total adjusted revenues 21,988
   21,589
   22,387
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (1),(2),(3)
 (230)   78
   172
 
           Total revenues $21,758
   $21,667
   $22,559
 

(1) Amortized hedge costs related to hedging U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan were $236, $228 and $186 for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and reported as a deduction from net investment income when analyzing segment operations.
(2) Amortized hedge costs in Aflac Japan were partially offset by derivatives entered into as part of corporate activities and resulted in a benefit of $36 for 2018, which has been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and reported as an increase in net investment income when analyzing operations.
(3) An immaterial amount of net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies in 2018, were reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) into net investment income when analyzing operations.

114




(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Pretax earnings:           
Aflac Japan $3,208
   $3,054
   $3,148
 
Aflac U.S. 1,285
   1,245
   1,208
 
Corporate and other (139)   (212)   (239) 
    Pretax adjusted earnings 4,354
   4,087
   4,117
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (1),(2),(3),(4)
 (297)   0
   87
 
Other income (loss) (5)
 (74)
  (69)   (137)
    Total earnings before income taxes $3,983
   $4,018
   $4,067
 
Income taxes applicable to pretax adjusted earnings $1,129
   $1,370
   $1,426
 
Effect of foreign currency translation on after-tax
adjusted earnings
 28
   (41)   141
 

(1) Amortized hedge costs related to hedging U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan were $236, $228 and $186 for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and reported as a deduction from pretax adjusted earnings when analyzing segment operations.
(2) Amortized hedge costs in Aflac Japan were partially offset by derivatives entered into as part of corporate activities and resulted in a benefit of $36 for 2018, which has been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and reported as an increase in pretax adjusted earnings when analyzing operations.
(3) An immaterial amount of net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies in 2018, were reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) into net investment income when analyzing operations.
(4) Excluding a gain of $85$67 in 2015, $442018, $77 in 2014 2017and $10$85 in 20132016, related to the interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on notes payable which is classified as an operating gainincluded in adjusted earnings when analyzing segment operations
(2)(5) Includes a loss of $20 related to the change in value of yen repatriation received in advance of settlement of certain foreign currency derivatives. The loss was offset by derivative gains included in realized investment gains (losses).

99



(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Pretax earnings:           
Aflac Japan $3,175
   $3,458
   $3,628
 
Aflac U.S. 1,101
   1,073
   1,038
 
Other business segments 14
   (2)   (1) 
    Total business segment pretax operating earnings 4,290
   4,529
   4,665
 
Interest expense, noninsurance operations (146)   (198)   (198) 
Corporate and eliminations (71)   (78)   (68) 
    Pretax operating earnings 4,073
   4,253
   4,399
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (1)
 55
   171
   389
 
Other non-operating income (loss) (266)
(2),(3) 
  67
   28
 
    Total earnings before income taxes $3,862
   $4,491
   $4,816
 
Income taxes applicable to pretax operating earnings $1,403
   $1,456
   $1,512
 
Effect of foreign currency translation on operating earnings (198)   (117)   (357) 
(1) Excluding a gain of $85 in 2015, $44 in 2014 and $10 in 2013 related to the interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on notes payable which is classified as an operating gain when analyzing segment operations
(2) Includes a loss of $20 related to the change in value of yen repatriation received in advance of settlement of certain foreign currency derivatives. This loss was offset by derivative gains included in realized investment gains (losses).
(3) Includes expense of $230$13 in 2017 and $137 in 2016 for the make-whole payment associated with the early extinguishment of debt


Assets as of December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)2018 2017 
Assets:        
Aflac Japan $118,342
   $114,402
  
Aflac U.S. 19,100
   19,893
  
Corporate and other 2,964
   2,922
  
    Total assets $140,406
   $137,217
  

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Assets:           
Aflac Japan $97,646
   $98,525
   $102,973
 
Aflac U.S. 18,537
   18,383
   16,112
 
Other business segments 188
   128
   155
 
    Total business segment assets 116,371
   117,036
   119,240
 
Corporate 23,415
   24,636
   19,909
 
Intercompany eliminations (21,490)   (21,905)   (17,842) 
    Total assets $118,296
   $119,767
   $121,307
 


Yen-Translation Effects: The following table shows the yen/dollar exchange rates used for or during the periods ended December 31. Exchange effects were calculated using the same yen/dollar exchange rate for the current year as for each respective prior year.
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Statements of Earnings:              
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate(1) 120.99
 105.46
 97.54
  110.39
 112.16
 108.70
 
Yen percent strengthening (weakening) (12.8)% (7.5)% (18.2)%  1.6% (3.1)% 11.3% 
Exchange effect on pretax operating earnings (in millions) $(288) $(180) $(534)  $38
 $(63) $218
 


 2018 2017
Balance Sheets:       
Yen/dollar exchange rate at December 31(1)
 111.00
   113.00
 
Yen percent strengthening (weakening) 1.8%   3.1% 
Exchange effect on total assets (in millions) $1,362
   $2,593
 
Exchange effect on total liabilities (in millions) 1,270
   2,848
 

 2015 2014
Balance Sheets:       
Yen/dollar exchange rate at December 31 120.61
   120.55
 
Yen percent strengthening (weakening) (.05)%   (12.6)% 
Exchange effect on total assets (in millions) $(36)   $(10,706) 
Exchange effect on total liabilities (in millions) (41)   (12,025) 
(1) Rates are based on the published MUFG Bank, Ltd. telegraphic transfer middle rate (TTM)


Transfers of funds from Aflac Japan: Aflac Japan makes payments to the Parent Company for management fees, allocated expenses and remittances of earnings. Prior to the Aflac U.S. forJapan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan paid allocated expenses and profit repatriations.remittances to Aflac U.S. Information on transfers for each of the years ended December 31 is shown below. See Note 13 for information concerning restrictions on transfers from Aflac Japan.


100115




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Management fees $53
   $39
   $37
 
Allocated expenses 101
   71
   74
 
Profit repatriation 2,139
   1,704
   771
 
Total transfers from Aflac Japan $2,293
   $1,814
   $882
 


(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Management fees $136
   $93
   $79
 
Allocated expenses 24
   109
   106
 
Profit remittances 808
   1,150
   1,286
 
Total transfers from Aflac Japan $968
   $1,352
   $1,471
 


Property and Equipment: The costs of buildings, furniture and equipment are depreciated principally on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives (maximum of 50 years for buildings and 20 years for furniture and equipment). Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; expenditures for betterments are capitalized and depreciated. Classes of property and equipment as of December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)2018 2017
Property and equipment:       
Land $168
   $168
 
Buildings 456
   441
 
Equipment and furniture 400
   372
 
Total property and equipment 1,024
   981
 
Less accumulated depreciation 581
   547
 
Net property and equipment $443
   $434
 

(In millions)2015 2014
Property and equipment:       
Land $166
   $168
 
Buildings 400
   393
 
Equipment and furniture 329
   305
 
Total property and equipment 895
   866
 
Less accumulated depreciation 468
   437
 
Net property and equipment $427
   $429
 


Receivables: Receivables consist primarily of monthly insurance premiums due from individual policyholders or their employers for payroll deduction of premiums, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. At December 31, 20152018, $257$334 million,, or 36.4%39.2% of total receivables, were related to Aflac Japan's operations, compared with $386334 million, or 45.8%40.4%, at December 31, 20142017.
3. INVESTMENTS
Net Investment Income


The components of net investment income for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Fixed maturity securities $3,142
   $3,173
   $3,308
 
Equity securities 38
   42
   35
 
Other investments 369
   94
   31
 
Short-term investments and cash equivalents 41
   25
   11
 
Gross investment income 3,590
   3,334
   3,385
 
Less investment expenses 148
   114
   107
 
Net investment income $3,442
   $3,220
   $3,278
 



116


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Fixed-maturity securities $3,094
   $3,249
   $3,210
 
Perpetual securities 114
   141
   153
 
Equity securities and other 18
   7
   7
 
Short-term investments and cash equivalents 4
   2
   1
 
Gross investment income 3,230
   3,399
   3,371
 
Less investment expenses 95
   80
   78
 
Net investment income $3,135
   $3,319
   $3,293
 



101



Investment Holdings
The amortized cost for ourthe Company's investments in debt and perpetualfixed maturity securities, the cost for equity securities and the fair values of these investments at December 31 are shown in the following tables.
  2018
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Fair
  Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value
through other comprehensive income:
               
Fixed maturity securities: (1)
               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $30,637
   $3,700
   $140
   $34,197
 
Municipalities 385
   32
   9
   408
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 155
   22
   0
   177
 
Public utilities 1,732
   280
   4
   2,008
 
Sovereign and supranational 826
   123
   0
   949
 
Banks/financial institutions 5,440
   502
   238
   5,704
 
Other corporate 4,852
   649
   44
   5,457
 
Total yen-denominated 44,027
   5,308
   435
   48,900
 
  U.S. dollar-denominated:               
U.S. government and agencies 137
   9
   1
   145
 
Municipalities 1,343
   120
   8
   1,455
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 155
   8
   1
   162
 
Public utilities 4,772
   496
   105
   5,163
 
Sovereign and supranational 251
   60
   0
   311
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,860
   389
   35
   3,214
 
Other corporate 23,311
   1,343
   1,109
   23,545
 
Total U.S. dollar-denominated 32,829
   2,425
   1,259
   33,995
 
Total securities available for sale $76,856
(1) 
  $7,733
   $1,694
   $82,895
(1) 

(1) Includes perpetual securities ($1,139 at amortized cost and $1,140 at fair value)

  2018
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair  
Value  
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:               
Fixed maturity securities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $21,712
   $5,326
   $0
   $27,038
 
Municipalities 359
   110
   0
   469
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 14
   1
   0
   15
 
Public utilities 2,727
   254
   8
   2,973
 
Sovereign and supranational 1,551
   289
   0
   1,840
 
Banks/financial institutions 1,445
   158
   20
   1,583
 
Other corporate 2,510
   332
   38
   2,804
 
Total yen-denominated 30,318
   6,470
   66
   36,722
 
Total securities held to maturity $30,318
   $6,470
   $66
   $36,722
 



117


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  2015
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Fair
  Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:               
Fixed maturities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $17,293
   $1,862
   $0
   $19,155
 
Municipalities 128
   9
   0
   137
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 322
   33
   0
   355
 
Public utilities 1,400
   210
   10
   1,600
 
Sovereign and supranational 791
   180
   0
   971
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,321
   325
   105
   2,541
 
Other corporate 3,337
   448
   33
   3,752
 
Total yen-denominated 25,592
   3,067
   148
   28,511
 
  Dollar-denominated:               
U.S. government and agencies 110
   11
   0
   121
 
Municipalities 926
   151
   6
   1,071
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 200
   27
   0
   227
 
Public utilities 5,464
   636
   221
   5,879
 
Sovereign and supranational 331
   105
   0
   436
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,865
   634
   21
   3,478
 
Other corporate 25,154
   1,774
   1,302
   25,626
 
Total dollar-denominated 35,050
   3,338
   1,550
   36,838
 
Total fixed maturities 60,642
   6,405
   1,698
   65,349
 
Perpetual securities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Banks/financial institutions 1,581
   143
   93
   1,631
 
Other corporate 183
   22
   0
   205
 
  Dollar-denominated:               
Banks/financial institutions 77
   35
   1
   111
 
Total perpetual securities 1,841
   200
   94
   1,947
 
Equity securities: 

   

   

   

 
      Yen-denominated 472
   19
   4
   487
 
      Dollar-denominated 8
   3
   0
   11
 
Total equity securities 480
   22
   4
   498
 
Total securities available for sale $62,963
   $6,627
   $1,796
   $67,794
 




102



  2015
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair  
Value  
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:               
Fixed maturities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $20,004
   $3,387
   $0
   $23,391
 
Municipalities 341
   74
   0
   415
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 36
   2
   0
   38
 
Public utilities 3,092
   205
   94
   3,203
 
Sovereign and supranational 2,555
   182
   26
   2,711
 
Banks/financial institutions 4,431
   168
   53
   4,546
 
Other corporate 3,000
   260
   44
   3,216
 
Total yen-denominated 33,459
   4,278
   217
   37,520
 
Total securities held to maturity $33,459
   $4,278
   $217
   $37,520
 
  
2018
(In millions)      Fair  
Value  
Equity securities, carried at fair value through
net earnings:
               
Equity securities: (1) 
               
      Yen-denominated             $641
 
      U.S. dollar-denominated             346
 
Total equity securities             $987
(1) 
(1) Includes perpetual securities ($62 at fair value)
 

103
 2017
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Fair
  Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:               
Fixed maturity securities: (1)
               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $27,980
   $3,363
   $271
   $31,072
 
Municipalities 314
   28
   12
   330
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 242
   29
   0
   271
 
Public utilities 1,635
   352
   6
   1,981
 
Sovereign and supranational 1,380
   190
   1
   1,569
 
Banks/financial institutions 4,742
   811
   53
   5,500
 
Other corporate 4,085
   809
   7
   4,887
 
Total yen-denominated 40,378
   5,582
   350
   45,610
 
  U.S dollar-denominated:               
U.S. government and agencies 146
   13
   1
   158
 
Municipalities 872
   168
   0
   1,040
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 161
   12
   0
   173
 
Public utilities 5,116
   884
   27
   5,973
 
Sovereign and supranational 267
   73
   0
   340
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,808
   633
   8
   3,433
 
Other corporate 25,384
   2,620
   418
   27,586
 
Total U.S. dollar-denominated 34,754
   4,403
   454
   38,703
 
Total securities available for sale $75,132
(1) 
  $9,985
   $804
   $84,313
(1) 


(1) Includes perpetual securities ($1,462 at amortized cost and $1,789 at fair value)



118



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 2014
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Fair
  Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:               
Fixed maturities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $17,341
   $1,740
   $0
   $19,081
 
Municipalities 88
   9
   0
   97
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 351
   35
   0
   386
 
Public utilities 1,691
   226
   5
   1,912
 
Sovereign and supranational 799
   163
   0
   962
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,752
   325
   189
   2,888
 
Other corporate 3,479
   531
   48
   3,962
 
Total yen-denominated 26,501
   3,029
   242
   29,288
 
  Dollar-denominated:               
U.S. government and agencies 100
   17
   0
   117
 
Municipalities 961
   201
   2
   1,160
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 185
   31
   0
   216
 
Public utilities 5,061
   960
   36
   5,985
 
Sovereign and supranational 343
   111
   0
   454
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,943
   775
   8
   3,710
 
Other corporate 22,291
   2,682
   330
   24,643
 
Total dollar-denominated 31,884
   4,777
   376
   36,285
 
Total fixed maturities 58,385
   7,806
   618
   65,573
 
Perpetual securities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Banks/financial institutions 2,132
   223
   92
   2,263
 
Other corporate 183
   48
   0
   231
 
  Dollar-denominated:               
Banks/financial institutions 125
   50
   0
   175
 
Total perpetual securities 2,440
   321
   92
   2,669
 
Equity securities:               
      Yen-denominated 10
   7
   0
   17
 
    Dollar-denominated 9
   2
   0
   11
 
Total equity securities 19
   9
   0
   28
 
Total securities available for sale $60,844
   $8,136
   $710
   $68,270
 


  2017
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:               
Fixed maturity securities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $21,331
   $5,160
   $0
   $26,491
 
Municipalities 357
   105
   0
   462
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 26
   1
   0
   27
 
Public utilities 3,300
   398
   0
   3,698
 
Sovereign and supranational 1,523
   312
   0
   1,835
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,206
   190
   9
   2,387
 
Other corporate 2,687
   485
   0
   3,172
 
Total yen-denominated 31,430
   6,651
   9
   38,072
 
Total securities held to maturity $31,430
   $6,651
   $9
   $38,072
 



104
2017
(In millions)Fair
Value
Equity securities, carried at fair value:
Equity securities:
      Yen-denominated$695
      U.S. dollar-denominated328
Total equity securities$1,023




  2014
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:               
Fixed maturities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $20,023
   $3,195
   $0
   $23,218
 
Municipalities 346
   71
   0
   417
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 43
   3
   0
   46
 
Public utilities 3,342
   281
   20
   3,603
 
Sovereign and supranational 2,556
   272
   14
   2,814
 
Banks/financial institutions 4,932
   231
   78
   5,085
 
Other corporate 3,000
   326
   12
   3,314
 
Total yen-denominated 34,242
   4,379
   124
   38,497
 
Total securities held to maturity $34,242
   $4,379
   $124
   $38,497
 


The methods of determining the fair values of ourthe Company's investments in fixed-maturity securities, perpetualfixed maturity securities and equity securities are described in Note 5.


During 2018, the third and fourth quarters of 2015, we increased our investment in yen-denominated publicly traded equity securities, including new investments in exchange traded funds (ETFs) holding Japan real estate investment trusts. These securities are classified as available for sale and carried on our balance sheet at fair value. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value of our investment in yen-denominated publicly traded equity securities was $485 million.

During 2015, weCompany did not reclassify any investments from the held-to-maturity category to the available-for-sale category. During 2014, we2017, the Company reclassified three investments from the held-to-maturity category to the available-for-sale category as a result of the issuersissuers' credit rating being downgraded to below investment grade. At the time of the transfer, the securities had an aggregate amortized cost of $424$773 million and an aggregate unrealized lossgain of $54$47 million. During 2013, we reclassified two2016, the Company did not reclassify any investments from the held-to-maturity category to the available-for-sale category as a result of the issuer being downgraded to below investment grade. At the time of the transfer, the securities had an aggregate amortized cost of $492 millioncategory.

119


Item 8. Financial Statements and an aggregate unrealized loss of $153 millionSupplementary Data


Contractual and Economic Maturities


The contractual maturities of ourthe Company's investments in fixed maturitiesmaturity securities at December 31, 20152018, were as follows:
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Available for sale: (1)
      
Due in one year or less $810
   $861
Due after one year through five years 8,313
   8,312
Due after five years through 10 years 9,805
   10,355
Due after 10 years 57,618
   63,028
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 310
   339
Total fixed maturity securities available for sale $76,856
   $82,895
Held to maturity:      
Due in one year or less $180
   $182
Due after one year through five years 915
   948
Due after five years through 10 years 927
   1,004
Due after 10 years 28,282
   34,573
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 14
   15
Total fixed maturity securities held to maturity $30,318
   $36,722

  Aflac Japan Aflac U.S.
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair  
Value  
Available for sale:               
Due in one year or less $130
   $142
   $23
   $24
 
Due after one year through five years 2,617
   2,984
   648
   709
 
Due after five years through 10 years 11,543
   11,642
   2,105
   2,177
 
Due after 10 years 33,608
   37,112
   9,049
   9,569
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 372
   424
   35
   43
 
Total fixed maturities available for sale $48,270
   $52,304
   $11,860
   $12,522
 
Held to maturity:               
Due in one year or less 316
   320
   0
   0
 
Due after one year through five years 1,692
   1,775
   0
   0
 
Due after five years through 10 years 1,613
   1,732
   0
   0
 
Due after 10 years 29,802
   33,655
   0
   0
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 36
   38
   0
   0
 
Total fixed maturities held to maturity $33,459
   $37,520
   $0
   $0
 

105




At December 31, 2015,(1) Includes perpetual securities, categorized in accordance with their respective economic maturities (the expected maturity date created by the Parent Company and other business segments had portfolioscombination of available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities totaling $512 million at amortized cost and $523 million at fair value, which are not includedfeatures in the table above.financial instrument)


Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


The majority of our perpetual securities are subordinated to other debt obligations of the issuer, but rank higher than the issuer's equity securities. Perpetual securities have characteristics of both debt and equity investments, along with unique features that create economic maturity dates for the securities. Although perpetual securities have no contractual maturity date, they have stated interest coupons that were fixed at their issuance and subsequently change to a floating short-term interest rate after some period of time. The instruments are generally callable by the issuer at the time of changing from a fixed coupon rate to a new variable rate of interest, which is determined by the combination of some market index plus a fixed amount of basis points. The net effect is to create an expected maturity date for the instrument. The economic maturities of our investments in perpetual securities, which were all reported as available for sale at December 31, 2015, were as follows:
  
Aflac Japan Aflac U.S.
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair  
Value  
Due in one year or less $301
   $282
   $0
   $0
 
Due after one year through five years 292
   315
   0
   0
 
Due after 10 years 1,209
   1,293
   39
   57
 
Total perpetual securities available for sale $1,802
   $1,890
   $39
   $57
 

Investment Concentrations


OurThe Company's process for investing in credit-related investments begins with an independent approach to underwriting each issuer's fundamental credit quality. We evaluateThe Company evaluates independently those factors which we believethat it believes could influence an issuer's ability to make payments under the contractual terms of ourthe Company's instruments. This includes a thorough analysis of a variety of items including the issuer's country of domicile (including political, legal, and financial considerations); the industry in which the issuer competes (with an analysis of industry structure, end-market dynamics, and regulation); company specific issues (such as management, assets, earnings, cash generation, and capital needs); and contractual provisions of the instrument (such as financial covenants and position in the capital structure). WeThe Company further evaluateevaluates the investment considering broad business and portfolio management objectives, including asset/liability needs, portfolio diversification, and expected income.


Investment exposures that individually exceeded 10% of shareholders' equity as of December 31 were as follows:
2015 20142018 2017
(In millions)Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Japan National Government(1)
A $36,859 $42,025 A $37,021 $41,878A+ $51,207 $59,945 A $48,399 $56,532
(1)JGBsJapan Government Bonds (JGBs) or JGB-backed securities
Banks and Financial Institutions

One of our largest investment sector concentrations as of December 31, 2015, was banks and financial institutions. Within the countries we approve for investment opportunities, we primarily invest in financial institutions that are strategically crucial to each approved country's economy. The bank and financial institution sector is a highly regulated industry and plays a strategic role in the global economy.

Our total investments in the bank and financial institution sector as of December 31, including those classified as perpetual securities, were as follows:

106



  2015 2014
  
Total Investments in
Banks and Financial
Institutions Sector
(in millions)
 Percentage of
Total Investment
Portfolio
 Total Investments in
Banks and Financial
Institutions Sector
(in millions)
 Percentage of
Total Investment    
Portfolio
Fixed maturities:               
Amortized cost $9,617
   10%   $10,627
   11% 
Fair value 10,565
   10
   11,683
   11
 
Perpetual securities:               
Upper Tier II:               
Amortized cost $1,217
   1%   $1,554
   2% 
Fair value 1,265
   1
   1,645
   1
 
Tier I:               
Amortized cost 441
   0
   703
   1
 
Fair value 477
   0
   793
   1
 
Total:               
Amortized cost $11,275
   11%   $12,884
   14% 
Fair value 12,307
   11
   14,121
   13
 

Realized Investment Gains and Losses


Information regarding pretax realized gains and losses from investments for the years ended December 31 follows:

120


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Realized investment gains (losses) on securities:     
Fixed maturities:     
Available for sale:     
Gross gains from sales$224
 $192
 $316
Gross losses from sales(8) (12) (87)
Net gains (losses) from redemptions52
 34
 34
Other-than-temporary impairment losses(152) (31) (128)
Held to maturity:     
Net gains (losses) from redemptions0
 1
 0
Total fixed maturities116
 184
 135
Perpetual securities:     
Available for sale:     
Gross losses from sales0
 0
 (1)
Net gains (losses) from redemptions35
 0
 0
Other-than-temporary impairment losses0
 0
 (70)
Total perpetual securities35
 0
 (71)
Equity securities:     
Other-than-temporary impairment losses(1) 0
 (1)
Total equity securities(1) 0
 (1)
Derivatives and other:     
Derivative gains (losses)(10) 31
 326
Other0
 0
 10
  Total derivatives and other(10) 31
 336
  Total realized investment gains (losses)$140
 $215
 $399


(In millions)2018 2017 2016 
Realized investment gains (losses):      
Fixed maturity securities: (1)
      
Available for sale:      
Gross gains from sales$101
 $51
 $177
 
Gross losses from sales(156) (68) (62) 
Foreign currency gains (losses) on sales and redemptions73
 (48) 4
 
Other-than-temporary impairment losses(64) (7) (26) 
Total fixed maturity securities(46) (72) 93
 
Equity securities (1),(2)
(131) 71
(3) 
(35)
(3) 
Loan receivables:      
Loan loss reserves(17) (8) (2) 
Other gains (losses) on loans(2) 0
 0
 
Total loan receivables(19) (8) (2) 
Derivatives and other:      
Derivative gains (losses)(224) (109) (255) 
Foreign currency gains (losses)(10) (33) 185
 
Total derivatives and other(234) (142) (70) 
Total realized investment gains (losses)$(430) $(151) $(14) 

107



Other-than-temporary Impairment(1) Includes perpetual securities

(2) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2018 related to financial instruments.
(3) Includes impairments of $22 in 2017 and $57 in 2016

The majorityunrealized holding losses, net of our fixed maturity and perpetual security investments are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment using our debt impairment model. Our debt impairment model focuses on the ultimate collection of the cash flows from our investments and whether we have the intent to sell or if it is more likely than not we would be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost. The fair values of our fixed maturity and perpetual security investments fluctuate based on changes in interest rates, foreign exchange, and credit spreads in the global financial markets. Fair values can also be heavily influenced by the values of the assets of the issuer and expected ultimate recovery values upon a default, bankruptcy or other financial restructuring. Credit spreads are most impacted by the general credit environment and global market liquidity. Interest rates are driven by numerous factors including, but not limited to, supply and demand, governmental monetary actions, expectations of inflation and economic growth. We believe that fluctuations in the fair values of our investment securities related to general changes in the level of credit spreads or interest rates have little bearing on underlying credit quality of the issuer, and whether our investment is ultimately recoverable. Generally, we consider such declines in fair values to be temporary even in situations where an investment remains in an unrealized loss position for an extended period of time.

In the course of our review process, we may determine that it is unlikely that our fixed maturity or perpetual security investment will recover in value within an acceptable time frame. Factors which may influence this determination include the severity of the price decline, the length of time the price has been impaired, if the price decline was driven by issuer credit deterioration, and our view of the likelihood of the security defaulting or otherwise being subject to an unfavorable restructuring. In those cases where we believe the security will not recover in price within an acceptable period of time, we consider such a decline in the investment's fair value, to the extent it is below the investment's cost or amortized cost, to be an other-than-temporary impairment of the investment and reduce the book value of the investment to its fair value.

The perpetual securities we hold were largely issued by banks that are integral to the financial markets of the sovereign country of the issuer. As a result of the issuer's position within the economy of the sovereign country, our perpetual securities may be subject to a higher risk of nationalization of their issuers in connection with capital injections from an issuer's sovereign government. We cannot be assured that such capital support will extend to all levels of an issuer's capital structure. In addition, certain governments or regulators may consider imposing interest and principal payment restrictions on issuers of hybrid securities to preserve cash and preserve the issuer's capital. Beyond the cash flow impact that additional deferrals would have on our portfolio, such deferrals could result in ratings downgrades of the affected securities, which in turn could result in a reduction of fair value of the securities and increase our regulatory capital requirements. We consider these factors in our credit review process.

When determining our intention to sell a security prior to recovery of its fair value to amortized cost, we evaluate facts and circumstances such as, but not limited to, future cash flow needs, decisions to reposition our security portfolio, and risk profile of individual investment holdings. We perform ongoing analyses of our liquidity needs, which includes cash flow testing of our policy liabilities, debt maturities, projected dividend payments and other cash flow and liquidity needs. Our cash flow testing includes extensive duration analysis of our investment portfolio and policy liabilities. Based on our analyses, we have concluded that we have sufficient excess cash flows to meet our liquidity needs without selling any of our investments prior to their maturity.

Our investments in perpetual securities that are rated below investment grade and equity securities are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment under our equity impairment model. Our equity impairment model focuses on the severity of a security’s decline in fair value coupled with the length of time the fair value of the security has been below cost or amortized cost and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. For equity securities, we also verify our intent to hold the securities until they recover in value. The fair value of our investments in equity securities may decline for various reasons, such as general market conditions which reflect prospects for the economygains, recorded as a whole, or due to specific information pertaining to an industry or an individual company. For those equity securities evaluated for impairment under the equity impairment model that are in an unrealized loss position, if we believe the security will not recover in price within an acceptable periodcomponent of time, or we do not have the intent to hold until recovery, we will record an other-than-temporary impairment of therealized investment gains and reduce the cost of the investment to its fair value on that date.

The following table details our pretax other-than-temporary impairment losses by investment category that resulted from our impairment evaluation process for the years ended December 31.

108



(In millions)2015 2014 2013 
Perpetual securities$0
 $0
 $70
 
Corporate bonds17
 31
 102
 
Bank/financial institution bonds135
 0
 0
 
Sovereign and supranational0
 0
 26
 
Equity securities1
 0
 1
 
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses realized (1)
$153

$31

$199

(1) Includes $131 and $45 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2013, respectively, for credit-related impairments; $26 for the year ended December 31, 2013 for impairments due2018, that relates to severity and duration of decline in fair value; and $22, $31 and $128 forequity securities still held at the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, from change in intent to sell securities2018, reporting date was $124 million.


Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses


Information regarding changes in unrealized gains and losses from investments recorded in AOCI for the years ended December 31 follows:
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Changes in unrealized gains (losses):           
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale (1)
 $(3,142)   $1,657
   $2,711
 
Equity securities (2)
 0
   71
   88
 
Total change in unrealized gains (losses) $(3,142)   $1,728
   $2,799
 

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Changes in unrealized gains (losses):           
Fixed maturities:           
Available for sale $(2,481)   $5,629
   $(2,281) 
Transferred to held to maturity 0
   (10)   (9) 
Perpetual securities:           
Available for sale (123)   269
   (129) 
Equity securities 9
   5
   1
 
Total change in unrealized gains (losses) $(2,595)   $5,893
   $(2,418) 
(1) Includes perpetual securities

(2) See Note 1 and Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance and the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle related to financial instruments effective January 1, 2018.

Effect on Shareholders' Equity


The net effect on shareholders' equity of unrealized gains and losses from investment securities at December 31 was as follows:
(In millions)2018 2017
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale $6,039
   $9,358
 
Deferred income taxes (1,805)   (3,394) 
Shareholders’ equity, unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities $4,234
   $5,964
 

See Notes 1 and 10 for discussion of the accounting treatment of tax on amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income pursuant to the Tax Act and Note 1 for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2018 related to financial instruments.


121



(In millions)2015 2014
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale $4,831
   $7,426
 
Deferred income taxes (1,845)   (2,754) 
Shareholders’ equity, unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities $2,986
   $4,672
 


Gross Unrealized Loss Aging


The following tables show the fair values and gross unrealized losses of ourthe Company's available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investments that were in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31.
 

109
  2018
  Total Less than 12 months 12 months or longer
(In millions)Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
Fixed maturity securities: (1)
                       
  U.S. government and
agencies:
                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated $67
   $1
   $67
   $1
   $0
   $0
 
  Japan government and
agencies:
                       
  Yen-denominated 3,604
   140
   3,604
   140
   0
   0
 
  Municipalities:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 515
   8
   515
   8
   0
   0
 
  Yen-denominated 148
   9
   148
   9
   0
   0
 
Mortgage- and asset-
backed securities:
                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 74
   1
   74
   1
   0
   0
 
  Public utilities:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 1,585
   105
   892
   48
   693
   57
 
  Yen-denominated 604
   12
   604
   12
   0
   0
 
  Banks/financial institutions:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 625
   35
   340
   19
   285
   16
 
  Yen-denominated 3,057
   258
   3,057
   258
   0
   0
 
  Other corporate:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 12,899
   1,109
   5,782
   407
   7,117
   702
 
  Yen-denominated 1,306
   82
   1,306
   82
   0
   0
 
  Total $24,484
   $1,760
   $16,389
   $985
   $8,095
   $775
 


(1) Includes perpetual securities




122




  2015
  Total Less than 12 months 12 months or longer
(In millions)Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
Fixed Maturities:                       
  Municipalities:                       
  Dollar-denominated $80
   $6
   $80
   $6
   $0
   $0
 
  Public utilities:                       
  Dollar-denominated 2,127
   221
   1,689
   132
   438
   89
 
  Yen-denominated 1,487
   104
   1,062
   73
   425
   31
 
  Sovereign and supranational:                       
  Yen-denominated 580
   26
   385
   13
   195
   13
 
  Banks/financial institutions:                       
  Dollar-denominated 366
   21
   348
   11
   18
   10
 
  Yen-denominated 2,350
   158
   1,147
   14
   1,203
   144
 
  Other corporate:                       
  Dollar-denominated 13,430
   1,302
   11,068
   770
   2,362
   532
 
  Yen-denominated 1,151
   77
   343
   5
   808
   72
 
  Total fixed maturities 21,571
   1,915
   16,122
   1,024
   5,449
   891
 
Perpetual securities:                       
  Dollar-denominated 6
   1
   0
   0
   6
   1
 
  Yen-denominated 645
   93
   216
   12
   429
   81
 
  Total perpetual securities 651
   94
   216
   12
   435
   82
 
Equity securities:                       
  Yen-denominated 191
   4
   191
   4
   0
   0
 
  Total equity securities 191
   4
   191
   4
   0
   0
 
  Total $22,413
   $2,013
   $16,529
   $1,040
   $5,884
   $973
 


  2017
  Total Less than 12 months 12 months or longer
(In millions)Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
Fixed maturity securities: (1)
                       
  U.S. government and
agencies:
                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated $74
   $1
   $74
   $1
   $0
   $0
 
  Japan government and
agencies:
                       
  Yen-denominated 5,255
   271
   1,264
   9
   3,991
   262
 
  Municipalities:                       
  Yen-denominated 129
   12
   10
   0
   119
   12
 
  Public utilities:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 785
   27
   221
   3
   564
   24
 
  Yen-denominated 83
   6
   0
   0
  ��83
   6
 
  Sovereign and supranational:                       
  Yen-denominated 309
   1
   309
   1
   0
   0
 
  Banks/financial institutions:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 362
   8
   316
   5
   46
   3
 
  Yen-denominated 1,507
   62
   394
   4
   1,113
   58
 
  Other corporate:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 7,741
   418
   2,839
   50
   4,902
   368
 
  Yen-denominated 440
   7
   349
   4
   91
   3
 
  Total $16,685
   $813
   $5,776
   $77
   $10,909
   $736
 


(1) Includes perpetual securities


110



  2014
  Total Less than 12 months 12 months or longer
(In millions)Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
Fixed Maturities:                       
  Municipalities:                       
  Dollar-denominated $75
   $2
   $53
   $1
   $22
   $1
 
  Public utilities:                       
  Dollar-denominated 1,001
   36
   164
   7
   837
   29
 
  Yen-denominated 805
   25
   98
   1
   707
   24
 
  Sovereign and supranational:                       
  Yen-denominated 359
   14
   0
   0
   359
   14
 
  Banks/financial institutions:                       
  Dollar-denominated 205
   8
   53
   5
   152
   3
 
  Yen-denominated 1,828
   267
   166
   0
   1,662
   267
 
  Other corporate:                       
  Dollar-denominated 8,072
   330
   1,901
   62
   6,171
   268
 
  Yen-denominated 1,151
   60
   122
   2
   1,029
   58
 
  Total fixed maturities 13,496
   742
   2,557
   78
   10,939
   664
 
Perpetual securities:                       
  Yen-denominated 783
   92
   194
   5
   589
   87
 
  Total perpetual securities 783
   92
   194
   5
   589
   87
 
  Total $14,279
   $834
   $2,751
   $83
   $11,528
   $751
 


Analysis of Securities in Unrealized Loss Positions


The unrealized losses on ourthe Company's fixed income or perpetualmaturity securities investments have been primarily related to general market changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and/or the levels of credit spreads rather than specific concerns with the issuer's ability to pay interest and repay principal. The unrealized losses on our investments in equity securities are primarily related to general market conditions which reflect prospects for the economy as a whole or due to specific information pertaining to an industry or an individual company.


For any significant declines in fair value of ourits fixed income or perpetualmaturity securities, we performthe Company performs a more focused review of the related issuers' credit profile. For corporate issuers, we evaluatethe Company evaluates their assets, business profile including industry dynamics and competitive positioning, financial statements and other available financial data. For non-corporate issuers, we analyzethe Company analyzes all sources of credit support, including issuer-specific factors. We utilizeThe Company utilizes information available in the public domain and, for certain private placement issuers, from consultations with the issuers directly. WeThe Company also considerconsiders ratings from Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs), as well as the specific characteristics of the security we ownit owns including seniority in the issuer's capital structure, covenant predictions, or other relevant features. From these reviews, we evaluatethe Company evaluates the issuers' continued ability to service ourthe Company's investment through payment of interest and principal.

For any significant declines in fair value of our equity securities, we review the severity of the security’s decline in fair value coupled with the length of time the fair value of the security has been below cost. We also perform a more focused review of the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and determine whether we have the intent to hold the securities until they recover in value.


111



The following table provides more information on our unrealized loss position on fixed maturities and perpetual securities as of December 31.
 20152014
(In millions)Investments 
in an Unrealized
Loss Position
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Gross
Unrealized
Losses that are Investment Grade
Investments 
in an Unrealized
Loss Position
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Gross
Unrealized
Losses that are Investment Grade
Fixed Maturities:                  
  Public utilities 16%  16%  93%  13%  7%  100% 
  Sovereign and
   supranational
 3
  1
  100
  3
  2
  100
 
  Banks/financial
   institutions
 12
  9
  59
  14
  33
  31
 
  Other corporate 66
  69
  86
  65
  47
  88
 
  Total fixed
   maturities
 97%  95%     95%  89%    
Perpetual securities 3
  5
  100
  5
  11
  100
 
  Total 100%  100%     100%  100%    


Assuming no credit-related factors develop, unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity securities are expected to diminish as investments near maturity. Based on ourits credit analysis, we believethe Company believes that the issuers of ourits fixed maturity investments in the sectors shown in the table above have the ability to service their obligations to us.the Company.


Perpetual Securities

123




Other Investments

The table below reflects the composition of the carrying value for other investments as of December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017
Other investments:       
Transitional real estate loans $4,377
   $1,235
 
Commercial mortgage loans 1,064
   908
 
Middle market loans 1,478
   859
 
Policy loans 232
   210
 
Short-term investments 152
   57
 
Other 403
   133
 
Total other investments $7,706
   $3,402
 


Loans and Loan Receivables

The majority of ourCompany classifies its TREs, CMLs, and MMLs as held-for investment and includes them in the other investments in Upper Tier II and Tier I perpetual securities are in highly-rated global financial institutions. Upper Tier II securities have more debt-like characteristics than Tier I securities and are senior to Tier I securities, preferred stock, and common equity of the issuer. Conversely, Tier I securities have more equity-like characteristics, but are senior to the common equity of the issuer, and they may also be senior to certain preferred shares; dependingline on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company carries them on the balance sheet at amortized cost less an estimated allowance for loan losses. The Company's allowance for loan losses is established using both general and specific allowances. The general allowance is used for loans grouped by similar risk characteristics where a loan-specific or market-specific risk has not been identified, but for which the Company estimates probable incurred losses. The specific allowance is used on an individual security;loan basis when it is probable that a loss has been incurred. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the issuer's capital structureCompany's allowance for loan losses was $27 million and $11 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the regulatory jurisdiction ofCompany had no loans that were past due in regards to principal and/or interest payments. Additionally, the issuer.

Details of our holdings of perpetual securitiesCompany held no loans that were on nonaccrual status or considered impaired as of December 31, were2018 and 2017. The Company had no troubled debt restructurings during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Transitional Real Estate Loans

Transitional real estate loans are commercial mortgage loans that are typically relatively short-term floating rate instruments secured by a first lien on the property. These loans provide funding for properties undergoing a change in their physical characteristics and/or economic profile. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $605 million in outstanding commitments to fund transitional real estate loans. These commitments are contingent on the final underwriting and due diligence to be performed.

Commercial Mortgage Loans

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $25 million in outstanding commitments to fund commercial mortgage loans. These commitments are contingent on the final underwriting and due diligence to be performed.

Middle Market Loans

Middle market loans are generally considered to be below investment grade. The carrying value for middle market loans included an unfunded amount of $56 million and $109 million, as follows:of December 31, 2018, and 2017, respectively, that is reflected in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.


Perpetual SecuritiesAs of December 31, 2018, the Company had commitments of approximately $521 million to fund potential future loan originations related to this investment program. These commitments are contingent upon the availability of middle market loans that meet the Company's underwriting criteria.

     2015 2014
(In millions)Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Upper Tier II:                         
 A  $31
   $41
   $10
   $61
   $87
   $26
 
 BBB  1,023
   993
   (30)   1,330
   1,333
   3
 
 BB or lower  163
   231
   68
   163
   225
   62
 
Total Upper Tier II   1,217
   1,265
   48
   1,554
   1,645
   91
 
Tier I:                         
 BBB  395
   408
   13
   519
   556
   37
 
 BB or lower  46
   69
   23
   184
   237
   53
 
Total Tier I   441
   477
   36
   703
   793
   90
 
Other subordinated
- non-banks:
                         
 BB or lower  183
   205
   22
   183
   231
   48
 
Total   $1,841
   $1,947
   $106
   $2,440
   $2,669
   $229
 
Other


Assuming no credit-related factors develop, asOther investments near maturity, the unrealized gains or losses are expected to diminish. Based on our credit analysis, we believe that the issuers of ourprimarily includes investments in these sectors have the ability to service their obligations to us. Perpetual securities that had an amortized costlimited partnerships. As of $599 million and fair value of $630 million at December 31, 2014 matured or were called during 2015.2018, the Company had $916 million in outstanding commitments to fund alternative investments in limited partnerships.




112124






Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)


As a condition to ourof its involvement or investment in a VIE, we enterthe Company enters into certain protective rights and covenants that preclude changes in the structure of the VIE that would alter the creditworthiness of ourthe Company's investment or ourits beneficial interest in the VIE.


OurFor those VIEs other than certain unit trust structures, the Company's involvement with all of the VIEs in which we have an interest is passive in nature, and we are not the arranger of these entities. We have not been involved in establishing these entities, except as it relates to our review and evaluation of the structure of these VIEs in the normal course of our investment decision-making process. Further, we arenature. The Company has not, nor have wehas it been, required to purchase any securities issued in the future by these VIEs.


OurThe Company's ownership interest in the VIEs is limited to holding the obligations issued by them. All of the VIEs in which we invest are static with respect to funding and have no ongoing forms of funding after the initial funding date. We haveThe Company has no direct or contingent obligations to fund the limited activities of these VIEs, nor do wedoes it have any direct or indirect financial guarantees related to the limited activities of these VIEs. We haveThe Company has not provided any assistance or any other type of financing support to any of the VIEs we investit invests in, nor do wedoes it have any intention to do so in the future. TheFor those VIEs in which the Company holds debt obligations, the weighted-average lives of ourthe Company's notes are very similar to the underlying collateral held by these VIEs where applicable.


OurThe Company's risk of loss related to ourits interests in any of ourits VIEs is limited to our investmentthe carrying value of the related investments held in the debt securities issued by them.VIE.


VIEs - Consolidated


The following table presents the cost or amortized cost, fair value and balance sheet caption in which the assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs are reported as of December 31.
Investments in Consolidated Variable Interest Entities
  2018 2017
(In millions)Cost or Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Cost or Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Assets:               
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale (1)
 $3,849
   $4,466
   $4,538
   $5,509
 
Equity securities 160
   160
   606
   753
 
Other investments (2)
 5,856
   5,834
   2,341
   2,328
 
Other assets (3)
 182
   182
   151
   151
 
Total assets of consolidated VIEs $10,047
   $10,642
   $7,636
   $8,741
 
Liabilities:               
Other liabilities (3)
 $102
   $102
   $128
   $128
 
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs $102
   $102
   $128
   $128
 

  2015 2014
(In millions)Cost or Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Cost or Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Assets:               
Fixed maturities, available for sale $3,739
   $4,554
   $3,020
   $4,166
 
Perpetual securities, available for sale 255
   228
   405
   429
 
Fixed maturities, held to maturity 0
   0
   83
   84
 
Equity securities 363
   363
   0
   0
 
Other assets 102
   102
   106
   106
 
Total assets of consolidated VIEs $4,459
   $5,247
   $3,614
   $4,785
 
Liabilities:               
Other liabilities $293
   $293
   $318
   $318
 
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs $293
   $293
   $318
   $318
 
(1) Includes perpetual securities

(2) Consists of TREs, CMLs, MMLs, and alternative investments in limited partnerships
We are(3) Consists entirely of derivatives

The Company is substantively the only investor in the consolidated VIEs listed in the table above. As the sole investor in these VIEs, we havethe Company has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and areis therefore considered to be the primary beneficiary of the VIEs that we consolidate. Weit consolidates. The Company also participateparticipates in substantially all of the variability created by these VIEs. The activities of these VIEs are limited to holding debt, equity, and perpetual securitiesinvested assets and foreign currency and/or CDSs,swaps, as appropriate, and utilizing the cash flows from these securities to service ourits investment. Neither wethe Company nor any of ourits creditors are able to obtain the underlying collateral of the VIEs unless there is an event of default or other specified event. For those VIEs that contain a swap, we arethe Company is not a direct counterparty to the swap contracts and havehas no control over them. OurThe Company's loss exposure to these VIEs is limited to ourits original investment. OurThe Company's consolidated VIEs do not rely on outside or ongoing sources of funding to support their activities beyond the underlying collateral and swap contracts, if applicable. With the exception of our investmentits investments in senior secured bank loans (bank loans) and certain equity securities through unit trust structures, the underlying collateral assets and funding of ourthe Company's consolidated VIEs are generally static in naturenature.


125





113




We investInvestments in bank loans throughUnit Trust Structures

The Company also utilizes unit trust structures in which we areits Aflac Japan segment to invest in various asset classes. As the onlysole investor requiring usof these VIEs, the Company is required to consolidate these trusts. These bank loans are classified as available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2015, the amortized cost and fair value of our bank loan investments was $1.4 billion. As of December 31, 2014, the amortized cost and fair value of our bank loan investments was $501 million and $579 million, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2015, we invested in yen-denominated public equities through a unit trust structure in which we are the only investor, requiring us to consolidate the trusttrusts under U.S. GAAP. These equities are classified as available-for-sale in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2015, the amortized cost and fair value of these equities was $363 million.


We are exposed to credit losses within our CDO that could result in principal losses to our investment. However, we have mitigated the risk of credit loss through the structure of the VIE, which contractually requires the subordinated tranches within the VIE to absorb the majority of the expected losses from the underlying credit default swaps. We currently own only senior mezzanine CDO tranches. Based on our statistical analysis models and the current subordination levels in our CDO, the VIE can sustain a reasonable number of defaults in the underlying reference entities in the CDS with no loss to our investment.

VIEs - Not Consolidated


The table below reflects the amortized cost, fair value and balance sheet caption in which ourthe Company's investment in VIEs not consolidated are reported as of December 31.


Investments in Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated
 2018 2017
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Assets:               
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale (1)
 $4,575
   $4,982
   $5,004
   $5,724
 
Fixed maturity securities, held to maturity 2,007
   2,254
   2,549
   2,929
 
Other investments 49
   49
   55
   55
 
Total investments in VIEs not consolidated $6,631
   $7,285
   $7,608
   $8,708
 

 2015 2014
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Assets:               
Fixed maturities, available for sale $5,536
   $6,027
   $6,104
   $6,937
 
Perpetual securities, available for sale 249
   253
   324
   330
 
Fixed maturities, held to maturity 2,477
   2,636
   2,564
   2,829
 
Total investments in VIEs not consolidated $8,262
   $8,916
   $8,992
   $10,096
 
(1) Includes perpetual securities


The Company holds alternative investments in limited partnerships that have been determined to be VIEs. These partnerships invest in private equity and structured investments. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on these investments is limited to the amount of its investment. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs and is therefore not required to consolidate them. The Company classifies these investments as Other investments in the consolidated balance sheets.

Certain investments in VIEs that we arethe Company is not required to consolidate are investments that are in the form of debt obligations from the VIEs that are irrevocably and unconditionally guaranteed by their corporate parents or sponsors. These VIEs are the primary financing vehicles used by their corporate sponsors to raise financing in the capital markets. The variable interests created by these VIEs are principally or solely a result of the debt instruments issued by them. We doThe Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, nor do wedoes it have (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. As such, we arethe Company is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs and areis therefore not required to consolidate them. These VIE investments comprise securities from 169 separate issuers with an average credit rating of BBB.


Loans and Loan Receivables

Middle Market Loans

As of December 31, 2015, our investment in middle market loan receivables was $118 million, of which $53 million was unfunded, while the associated allowance for expected losses was immaterial. As of December 31, 2015, we had commitments of $182 million to fund potential future loan originations related to this investment program. These commitments are contingent upon the availability of middle market loans that meet our underwriting criteria.

Commercial Mortgage Loans

During the fourth quarter of 2015, we initiated our commercial mortgage loan investment program. As of December 31, 2015, we had not yet funded any commercial mortgage loans. Once funded, we intend to classify our commercial mortgage loans as held-for-investment, and we will carry them on the balance sheet at amortized cost less an estimated allowance for loan losses. Our commercial mortgage loan allowance for losses will be established using both specific and general allowances. The specific allowance will be used on an individual loan basis for those impaired loans where we expect to incur a loss. The general allowance will be used for loans grouped by similar risk characteristics where a property-specific

114



or market-specific risk has not been identified, but for which we expect to incur a loss. As of December 31, 2015, we had $10 million in outstanding commitments to fund commercial mortgage loans. These commitments are contingent on the final underwriting and due diligence to be performed, and may or may not be funded.

Securities Lending and Pledged Securities


We lend fixed-maturityThe Company lends fixed maturity and public equity securities to financial institutions in short-term security-lending transactions. These short-term security-lending arrangements increase investment income with minimal risk. OurThe Company's security lending policy requires that the fair value of the securities and/received as collateral be 102% or more of the fair value of the loaned securities and that unrestricted cash received as collateral be 102%100% or more of the fair value of the loaned securities. These securities continue to be carried as investment assets on ourthe Company's balance sheet during the terms of the loans and are not reported as sales. We receiveThe Company receives cash or other securities as collateral for such loans. For loans involving unrestricted cash or securities as collateral, the collateral is reported as an asset with a corresponding liability for the return of the collateral. For loans where the Company receives as collateral securities that the Company is not permitted to sell or repledge, the collateral is not reported as an asset.



126




Details of our securities lending activities as of December 31 were as follows:
Securities Lending Transactions Accounted for as Secured Borrowings
2015
20182018
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
(In millions)
Overnight
and
Continuous
(1)
 Up to 30
days
 Total
Overnight
and
Continuous
(1)
 Up to 30
days
 Greater
than 90
days
 Total
Securities lending transactions:            
Fixed maturity securities:       
Japan government and agencies$0
 $499
 $499
$0
 $387
 $1,190
 $1,577
Municipalities5
 0
 0
 5
Public utilities108
 0
 108
27
 0
 0
 27
Banks/financial institutions13
 0
 13
74
 0
 0
 74
Other corporate321
 0
 321
549
 0
 0
 549
Equity securities10
 0
 0
 10
Total borrowings$442
 $499
 $941
$665
 $387
 $1,190
 $2,242
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending transactionsGross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending transactions $941
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending transactions  $1,052
Amounts related to agreements not included in offsetting disclosure in Note 4Amounts related to agreements not included in offsetting disclosure in Note 4 $0
Amounts related to agreements not included in offsetting disclosure in Note 4  $1,190
(1) These securities are pledged as collateral under ourthe Company's U.S. securities lending program and can be called at ourits discretion; therefore, they are classified as Overnight and Continuous.

Securities Lending Transactions Accounted for as Secured Borrowings
2017
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
(In millions)
Overnight
and
Continuous
(1)
 Up to 30
days
  Total
Securities lending transactions:      
Fixed maturity securities:      
Japan government and agencies$0
 $49
  $49
Public utilities73
 0
  73
Banks/financial institutions54
 0
  54
Other corporate415
 0
  415
Equity securities15
 0
  15
          Total borrowings$557
 $49
  $606
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending transactions $606
Amounts related to agreements not included in offsetting disclosure in Note 4 $0

Securities Lending Transactions Accounted for as Secured Borrowings
2014
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
(In millions)
Overnight
and
Continuous
(1)
 Up to 30
days
  Total
Securities lending transactions:      
Japan government and agencies$0
 $1,720
  $1,720
Public utilities80
 0
  80
Sovereign and supranational1
 0
  1
Banks/financial institutions64
 0
  64
Other corporate328
 0
  328
          Total borrowings$473
 $1,720
  $2,193
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending transactions $2,193
Amounts related to agreements not included in offsetting disclosure in Note 4 $0
(1) These securities are pledged as collateral under ourthe Company's U.S. securities lending program and can be called at ourits discretion; therefore, they are classified as Overnight and Continuous.


WeThe Company did not have any repurchase agreements or repurchase-to-maturity transactions outstanding as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively.

115






Certain fixed-maturityfixed maturity securities have beencan be pledged as collateral as part of derivative transactions.transactions, or pledged to support state deposit requirements on certain investment programs. For additional information regarding pledged securities related to derivative transactions, see Note 4.


At December 31, 2015,2018, debt securities with a fair value of $15$19 million were on deposit with regulatory authorities in
the United States (including U.S. territories) and Japan. We retainThe Company retains ownership of all securities on deposit and receivereceives the related investment income.


For general information regarding ourthe Company's investment accounting policies, see Note 1.



127


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


4.  DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
OurThe Company's freestanding derivative financial instruments consisthave historically consisted of: (1) foreign currency swaps and credit default swaps that are associated with investments in special-purpose entities, including VIEs where we are the primary beneficiary; (2) foreign currency forwards and options used in hedging foreign exchange risk on U.S. dollar-denominated securitiesinvestments in Aflac Japan's portfolio; (3)(2) foreign currency forwards and options used to hedge foreign exchange risk from our net investment in Aflac Japan and economically hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in yen and hedge the Company's long term exposure to a weakening yen; (4) swaps associated with our notes payable, consisting of(3) cross-currency interest rate swaps, also referred to as foreign currency swaps, associated with certain senior notes and our subordinated debentures; (4) foreign currency swaps and, in prior periods, credit default swaps that are associated with investments in special-purpose entities, including VIEs where the Company is the primary beneficiary; (5) options on interest rate swaps (orused to economically hedge interest rate swaptions)fluctuations in certain variable-rate investments; and futures(6) interest rate swaptions used to hedge changes in the fair value associated with interest rate riskfluctuations for certain U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, nor do we engage in leveraged derivative transactions. Some of ourthe Company's derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges, fair value hedges or net investment hedges; however, other derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting or we electthe Company elects not to designate them as an accounting hedge. We utilize a net investment hedge to mitigate foreign exchange exposure resulting from our net investment in Aflac Japan. In addition to designating derivatives as hedging instruments, we have designated our yen-denominated Samurai and Uridashi notes and yen-denominated loans as non-derivative hedging instruments for this net investment hedge.hedges.


Derivative Types

We enter into foreign currency swaps pursuant to which we exchange an initial principal amount in one currency for an initial principal amount of another currency, with an agreement to re-exchange the currencies at a future date at an agreed upon exchange rate. There may also be periodic exchanges of payments at specified intervals based on the agreed upon rates and notional amounts. Foreign currency swaps are used primarily in the consolidated VIEs in our Aflac Japan portfolio to convert foreign-denominated cash flows to yen, the functional currency of Aflac Japan, in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations. We also use foreign currency swaps to economically convert certain of our dollar-denominated senior note and subordinated debenture principal and interest obligations into yen-denominated obligations.


Foreign currency forwards and options with short-term maturities are executed for the Aflac Japan segment in order to hedge the currency risk on the faircarrying value of certain fixed-maturity U.S. dollar-denominated securities.investments. The average maturity of these forwards and options can change depending on factors such as market conditions and types of investments being held. In situations where the maturity of the forwards and options is shorter than the underlying investment being hedged, the Company may enter into new forwards and options near maturity of the existing derivative in order to continue hedging the underlying investment. In forward transactions, Aflac Japan agrees with another party to buy a fixed amount of yen and sell a corresponding amount of U.S. dollars at a specified future date. Aflac Japan also executes foreign currency option transactions in a collar strategy, where Aflac Japan agrees with another party to simultaneously purchase put options and sell call options. In the purchased put transactions, Aflac Japan obtains the option to buy a fixed amount of U.S. dollar put optionsyen and sell a corresponding amount of U.S. dollardollars at a specified future date. In the sold call options.transaction, Aflac Japan agrees to sell a fixed amount of yen and buy a corresponding amount of U.S. dollars at a specified future date. The combination of these two actionspurchasing the put option and selling the call option results in no net premium being paid (i.e. a costless or zero-cost collar). The foreign currency forwards and options are used in fair value hedging relationships to mitigate the foreign exchange risk associated with U.S. dollar-denominated investments supporting yen-denominatedyen- denominated liabilities.


ForeignPrior to April 1, 2018, foreign currency forwards and options are also(through a collar strategy, as discussed above) were used to hedge the currency risk associated with the net investment in Aflac Japan. In these forward transactions, Aflac agreesagreed with another party to buy a fixed amount of U.S. dollars and sell a corresponding amount of yen at a specified price at a specified future date. In the option transactions, we usethe Company used a combination of foreign currency options to protect expected future cash flows by simultaneously purchasing yen put options (options that protect against a weakening yen) and selling yen call options (options that limit participation in a strengthening yen). The combination of these two actions created a zero-cost collar.

The Company enters into foreign currency swaps pursuant to which it exchanges an initial principal amount in one currency for an initial principal amount of another currency, with an agreement to re-exchange the principal amounts at a future date. There may also be periodic exchanges of payments at specified intervals based on the agreed upon rates and notional amounts. Foreign currency swaps are used primarily in the consolidated VIEs in the Company's Aflac Japan portfolio to convert foreign-denominated cash flows to yen, the functional currency of Aflac Japan, in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations. The Company also uses foreign currency swaps to economically convert certain of its U.S. dollar-denominated senior note and subordinated debenture principal and interest obligations into yen-denominated obligations.

In order to reduce investment income volatility from its variable-rate investments, the Company enters into receive–fixed, pay–floating interest rate swaps. These derivatives are cleared and settled through a central clearinghouse.

Interest rate swaption collars are combinations of two swaption positions. Swaptions are used to mitigate the adverse impact resulting from significant changes in the fair value of U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities due to fluctuation in interest rates. In order to maximize the efficiency of the collars while minimizing cost, a collar strategy is used whereby the Company purchases a long payer swaption (the Company purchases an option that allows it to enter into a swap where the Company will pay the fixed rate and receive the floating rate of the swap) and sells a short receiver swaption (the Company sells an option that provides the counterparty with the right to enter into a swap where the Company will receive the fixed rate and pay the floating rate of the swap). The combination of purchasing the long payer swaption and selling the short receiver swaption results in no net premium being paid (i.e. a costless or zero-cost collar).


The only CDS that we currently hold relates to components of an investment in a VIE and is used to assume credit risk related to an individual security. This CDS contract entitles the consolidated VIE to receive periodic fees in exchange for an obligation to compensate the derivative counterparties should the referenced security issuer experience a credit event, as defined in the contract.

128
Interest rate swaps involve the periodic exchange of cash flows with other parties, at specified intervals, calculated using agreed upon rates or other financial variables and notional principal amounts. Typically, at the time a swap is

116




entered into, the cash flow streams exchanged by the counterparties are equal in value. No cash or principal payments are exchanged at the inception of the contract. Interest rate swaps are primarily used to convert interest receipts on floating-rate fixed-maturity securities contracts to fixed rates. These derivatives are predominantly used to better match cash receipts from assets with cash disbursements required to fund liabilities.

Interest rate swaptions are options on interest rate swaps. Interest rate collars are combinations of two swaption positions and are executed in order to hedge certain U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities that are held in the Aflac Japan segment. We use collars to protect against significant changes in the fair value associated with interest rate changes of our U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities. In order to maximize the efficiency of the collars while minimizing cost, we set the strike price on each collar so that the premium paid for the ‘payer leg’ is offset by the premium received for having sold the ‘receiver leg’.

Periodically, depending on general economic conditions, we may enter into other derivative transactions.

Credit Risk Assumed through Derivatives

For the foreign currency and credit default swaps associated with our VIE investments for which we are the primary beneficiary, we bear the risk of foreign exchange loss due to counterparty default even though we are not a direct counterparty to those contracts. We are a direct counterparty to the foreign currency swaps that we have entered into in connection with certain of our senior notes, subordinated debentures, and Samurai notes; foreign currency forwards; foreign currency options; and interest rate swaptions, and therefore we are exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties in those contracts. The risk of counterparty default for our VIE swaps, foreign currency swaps, certain foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options and interest rate swaptions is mitigated by collateral posting requirements that counterparties to those transactions must meet. As of December 31, 2015, there were 15 counterparties to our derivative agreements, with five comprising 63% of the aggregate notional amount. The counterparties to these derivatives are financial institutions with the following credit ratings as of December 31:

 20152014
(In millions)Notional Amount
of Derivatives
Asset Derivatives
Fair Value
Liability Derivatives
Fair Value
Notional Amount
of Derivatives
Asset Derivatives
Fair Value
Liability Derivatives
Fair Value
Counterparties' credit rating:                  
   AA $2,187
  $166
  $(35)  $1,098
  $39
  $(36) 
   A 19,940
  510
  (336)  22,564
  763
  (2,387) 
      Total $22,127
  $676
  $(371)  $23,662
  $802
  $(2,423) 


We engage in derivative transactions directly with unaffiliated third parties under International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) agreements and other documentation. Most of the ISDA agreements also include Credit Support Annex (CSA) provisions, which generally provide for two-way collateral postings, in certain cases at the first dollar of exposure and in other cases once various rating and exposure threshold levels are triggered. We mitigate the risk that counterparties to transactions might be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations by monitoring counterparty credit exposure and collateral value while generally requiring that collateral be posted at the outset of the transaction or that additional collateral be posted upon the occurrence of certain events or circumstances. In addition, a significant portion of the derivative transactions have provisions that require collateral to be posted upon a downgrade of our long-term debt ratings or give the counterparty the right to terminate the transaction upon a downgrade of Aflac’s financial strength rating. The actual amount of collateral required to be posted to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the aggregate amount of payments that we could be required to make, depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions, and other factors prevailing at and after the time of the downgrade.

The fair value of the collateral posted by us to third parties for derivative transactions was $20 million at December 31, 2015, which consisted of $17 million of pledged securities and $3 million of cash, compared with $1.6 billion at December 31, 2014, which consisted entirely of pledged securities. This collateral can generally be repledged or resold by the counterparties. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position by counterparty was approximately $26 million and $2.1 billion as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. If the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on December 31, 2015, we estimate that we would be required to post a maximum of $6 million of additional collateral to these derivative counterparties. Collateral obtained by us from third parties for derivative transactions was $412 million

117



and $619 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We are generally allowed to sell or repledge collateral obtained from our derivative counterparties, although we do not typically exercise such rights.
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments
Freestanding derivatives are carried at estimated fair value in our consolidated balance sheets either as other assets or as other liabilities. See Note 5 for a discussion on how we determine the fair value of our derivatives. Accruals on derivatives are recorded in accrued investment income or within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
If a derivative is not designated as an accounting hedge or its use in managing risk does not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative are generally reported within derivative and other gains(losses), which is a component of realized investment gains (losses). The fluctuations in estimated fair value of derivatives that have not been designated for hedge accounting can result in volatility in net earnings.
Hedge Documentation and Effectiveness Testing
To qualify for hedge accounting treatment, a derivative must be highly effective in mitigating the designated risk of the hedged item. At the inception of the hedging relationship for hedges we elect to designate for hedge accounting treatment, we formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking each hedge transaction. We document the designation of each hedge as either (i) a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability or the hedge of a forecasted transaction ("cash flow hedge"); (ii) a hedge of the estimated fair value of a recognized asset or liability ("fair value hedge"); or (iii) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. The documentation process includes linking derivatives and nonderivatives that are designated as hedges to specific assets or groups of assets or liabilities on the statement of financial position or to specific forecasted transactions and defining the effectiveness and ineffectiveness testing methods to be used. At the hedge's inception and on an ongoing quarterly basis, we also formally assess whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been, and are expected to continue to be, highly effective in offsetting their designated risk. Hedge effectiveness is assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods.
For assessing hedge effectiveness of cash flow hedges, qualitative methods may include the comparison of critical terms of the derivative to the hedged item, and quantitative methods may include regression or other statistical analysis of changes in cash flows associated with the hedge relationship. Hedge ineffectiveness of the hedge relationships on our VIE cash flow hedges is measured each reporting period using the “Hypothetical Derivative Method.” For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings within derivative and other gains (losses). All components of each derivative's gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
For assessing hedge effectiveness of fair value hedges, qualitative methods may include the comparison of critical terms of the derivative to the hedged item, and quantitative methods may include regression or other statistical analysis of changes in fair value associated with the hedge relationship. Hedge ineffectiveness of the hedge relationships is measured each reporting period using the dollar offset method. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative, including amounts measured as ineffectiveness, and changes in the estimated fair value of the hedged item related to the designated risk being hedged, are reported in current earnings within derivative and other gains (losses). When assessing the effectiveness of our fair value hedges, we exclude the changes in fair value related to the difference between the spot and the forward rate on our foreign currency forwards and the time value of options.
For the hedge of our net investment in Aflac Japan, we have designated Parent Company yen-denominated liabilities as non-derivative hedging instruments and have designated certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedging instruments. We make our net investment hedge designation at the beginning of each quarter. For assessing hedge effectiveness of net investment hedges, if the total of the designated Parent Company non-derivative and derivatives notional is equal to or less than our net investment in Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective. If the hedge is effective, the related exchange effect on the yen-denominated liabilities is reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. For derivatives designated as net investment hedges, Aflac follows the forward-rate method. According to that method, all changes in fair value, including changes related to the forward-rate component of foreign currency forward contracts and the time value of foreign currency options, are reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. Should these designated net investment hedge

118



positions exceed our net investment in Aflac Japan, the foreign exchange effect on the portion that exceeds our investment in Aflac Japan would be recognized in current earnings within derivative and other gains (losses).
Discontinuance of Hedge Accounting
We discontinue hedge accounting prospectively when (1) it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated cash flows or fair value of a hedged item; (2) the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument; or (3) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised.
When hedge accounting is discontinued on a cash flow hedge or fair value hedge, the derivative is carried in the consolidated balance sheets at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in current period earnings. For discontinued cash flow hedges, including those where the derivative is sold, terminated or exercised, amounts previously deferred in other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified into earnings when earnings are impacted by the cash flow of the hedged item.

Derivative Balance Sheet Classification
The tables below summarize the balance sheet classification of ourthe Company's derivative fair value amounts, as well as the gross asset and liability fair value amounts, at December 31. The fair value amounts presented do not include income accruals. The notional amount of derivative contracts represents the basis upon which pay or receive amounts are calculated. Notional amountscalculated and are not reflective of exposure or credit risk.

2018 2017
(In millions)    Asset
Derivatives
 Liability
Derivatives
  Asset
Derivatives
 Liability
Derivatives
Hedge Designation/ Derivative
Type
Notional
Amount
 Fair Value Fair ValueNotional
Amount
 Fair Value Fair Value
Cash flow hedges:                      
Foreign currency swaps $75
   $1
   $(4)  $75
   $0
   $(8) 
Total cash flow hedges 75
   1
   (4)  75
   0
   (8) 
Fair value hedges:                      
Foreign currency forwards 2,086
   0
   (34)  7,640
   2
   (221) 
Foreign currency options 9,070
   3
   (1)  7,670
   0
   (2) 
Interest rate swaptions 500
   0
   (1)  0
   0
   0
 
Total fair value hedges 11,656
   3
   (36)  15,310
   2
   (223) 
Net investment hedge:                      
Foreign currency forwards 0
   0
   0
  5
   0
   0
 
Foreign currency options 0
   0
   0
  434
   12
   (1) 
Total net investment hedge 0
   0
   0
  439
   12
   (1) 
Non-qualifying strategies:                      
Foreign currency swaps 5,387
   284
   (230)  5,386
   296
   (189) 
Foreign currency forwards 16,057
   126
   (117)  3,683
   20
   (53) 
Foreign currency options 430
   0
   0
  770
   0
   0
 
Credit default swaps 0
   0
   0
  88
   1
   0
 
Interest rate swaps 4,750
   3
   0
  0
   0
   0
 
Total non-qualifying strategies 26,624
   413
   (347)  9,927
   317
   (242) 
Total derivatives $38,355
   $417
   $(387)  $25,751
   $331
   $(474) 
Balance Sheet Location                      
Other assets $23,713
   $417
   $0
  $10,948
   $331
   $0
 
Other liabilities 14,642
   0
   (387)  14,803
   0
   (474) 
Total derivatives $38,355
   $417
   $(387)  $25,751
   $331
   $(474) 

 2015
(In millions)Net Derivatives Asset
Derivatives
 Liability
Derivatives
Hedge Designation/ Derivative TypeNotional
Amount
 Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value
Cash flow hedges:               
Foreign currency swaps $75
   $(15)   $0
   $(15) 
Total cash flow hedges 75
   (15)   0
   (15) 
Fair value hedges:               
Foreign currency forwards 13,080
   45
   88
   (43) 
Foreign currency options 1,250
   0
   0
   0
 
Total fair value hedges 14,330
   45
   88
   (43) 
Net investment hedge:               
Foreign currency forwards 763
   13
   19
   (6) 
Foreign currency options 266
   (3)   5
   (8) 
Total net investment hedge 1,029
   10
   24
   (14) 
Non-qualifying strategies:               
Foreign currency swaps 6,599
   264
   563
   (299) 
Foreign currency forwards 11
   0
   0
   0
 
Credit default swaps 83
   1
   1
   0
 
Total non-qualifying strategies 6,693
   265
   564
   (299) 
Total derivatives $22,127
   $305
   $676
   $(371) 
Balance Sheet Location               
Other assets $11,413
   $676
   $676
   $0
 
Other liabilities 10,714
   (371)   0
   (371) 
Total derivatives $22,127
   $305
   $676
   $(371) 

119



 2014
(In millions)Net Derivatives Asset
Derivatives
 Liability
Derivatives
Hedge Designation/ Derivative TypeNotional
Amount
 Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value
Cash flow hedges:               
Foreign currency swaps $75
   $(15)   $0
   $(15) 
Total cash flow hedges 75
   (15)   0
   (15) 
Fair value hedges:               
Foreign currency forwards 12,388
   (1,791)   0
   (1,791) 
Foreign currency options 697
   (32)   0
   (32) 
    Interest rate swaptions 2,502
   (159)   0
   (159) 
Total fair value hedges 15,587
   (1,982)   0
   (1,982) 
Net investment hedge:               
Foreign currency forwards 1,307
   54
   56
   (2) 
Total net investment hedge 1,307
   54
   56
   (2) 
Non-qualifying strategies:               
Foreign currency swaps 5,765
   443
   746
   (303) 
Foreign currency forwards 784
   (119)   0
   (119) 
Foreign currency options 53
   (1)   0
   (1) 
Credit default swaps 83
   0
   0
   0
 
Interest rate swaptions 8
   (1)   0
   (1) 
Total non-qualifying strategies 6,693
   322
   746
   (424) 
Total derivatives $23,662
   $(1,621)   $802
   $(2,423) 
Balance Sheet Location               
Other assets $6,531
   $802
   $802
   $0
 
Other liabilities 17,131
   (2,423)   0
   (2,423) 
Total derivatives $23,662
   $(1,621)   $802
   $(2,423) 


Cash Flow Hedges
Certain of our
For certain variable-rate U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities held by Aflac Japan via consolidated VIEs, have foreign currency swaps that qualify for hedge accounting treatment. For those that have qualified, we haveare used to swap the USD variable rate interest and principal payments to fixed rate JPY interest and principal payments. The Company has designated the derivativeforeign currency swaps as a hedge of the variability in cash flows of a forecasted transaction or of amounts to be received or paid related to a recognized asset (“cash flow” hedge). We expect to continue this hedging activityThe remaining maximum length of time for a weighted-average period of approximately 10which these cash flows are hedged is seven years. The remaining derivatives in ourthe Company's consolidated VIEs that haveare not qualified for hedge accounting have been designated as held for other investment purposes (“non-qualifying strategies”).accounting hedges are discussed in the "non-qualifying strategies" section of this note.
Fair Value Hedges
We designateThe Company designates and accountaccounts for certain foreign currency forwards, options, and optionsinterest rate swaptions as fair value hedges when they meet the requirements for hedge accounting. These foreignThe Company recognizes gains and losses on these derivatives as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the related hedged items in current earnings.


129




Foreign currency forwards and options hedge the foreign currency exposure of certain U.S. dollar-denominated fixed maturity securities within the investment portfolio of ouravailable-for-sale fixed-maturity investments held in Aflac Japan segment. We recognize gains and losses on these derivatives and the related hedged items in current earnings within derivative and other gains (losses).Japan. The change in the fair value of the foreign currency forwards related to the changes in the difference between the spot rate and the forward price is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The change in fair value of the foreign currency option related to the time value of the option is recognized in current earnings and is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
We designate and account for interest rate swaptions as fair value hedges when they meet the requirements for hedge accounting. These interest
Interest rate swaptions hedge the interest rate exposure of certain U.S. dollar-denominated fixed maturityavailable-for-sale securities withinheld in Aflac Japan. For these hedging relationships, the investment portfolioCompany excludes time value from the assessment of our Aflac Japan segment. We recognize gainshedge effectiveness and losses on these derivatives andrecognizes changes in the related hedged itemsintrinsic value of the swaptions in current earnings within derivative and other gains (losses).net investment income. The change

120



in the fair value of the interest rate swaptions related to the time value of the optionswaptions is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) and amortized into earnings (net investment income) over its legal term.

The following table presents the gains and losses on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedges for the years ended December 31.

Fair Value Hedging Relationships
(In millions)  Hedging Derivatives Hedged Items  
Hedging DerivativesHedged Items Total
Gains
(Losses)
 
Gains (Losses)
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
(2)
 
Gains (Losses)
Included in Effectiveness Testing
(1)
 
 Gains (Losses) (1)
 Net Realized Gains (Losses) Recognized for Fair Value Hedge
2018:          
Foreign currency
forwards
Fixed maturity securities $126
 $(104) $230
 $(242) $(12)
Foreign currency
options
Fixed maturity securities 4
 4
 0
 0
 0
Interest rate
swaptions
Fixed maturity securities (1) (1) 0
 0
 0
   Total gains (losses) $129
 $(101) $230
 $(242) $(12)
2017:       
Foreign currency forwardsFixed maturity and equity securities $98
 $(202) $300
 $(278) $22
Foreign currency optionsFixed maturity securities 21
 10
 11
 (10) 1
    Total gains (losses) $119
 $(192) $311
 $(288) $23
2016:       
Foreign currency forwardsFixed maturity and equity securities $207
 $(338) $545
 $(566) $(21)
Foreign currency optionsFixed maturity securities (95) (18) (77) 70
 (7)
    Total gains (losses) $112
 $(356) $468
 $(496) $(28)

(1) Gains and losses on foreign currency forwards and options and related hedged items are reported in the consolidated statement of earnings as realized investment gains (losses). For interest rate swaptions and related hedged items, gains and losses included in the hedge assessment are reported within net investment income. For the year ended December 31, 2018, those gains and losses on interest rate swaptions and related hedged items were immaterial.
(2) Gains (losses) excluded from effectiveness testing includes the forward point on foreign currency forwards and time value change on foreign currency options which are reported in the consolidated statement of earnings as realized investment gains (losses). It also includes the change in the fair value of the interest rate swaptions related to the time value of the swaptions which is recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).

The following table shows the December 31, 2018 carrying amounts of assets designated and qualifying as hedged items in fair value hedges of interest rate risk and the related cumulative hedge adjustment included in the carrying amount.

130



(In millions)  Hedging Derivatives Hedged Items  
Hedging DerivativesHedged Items Total
Gains (Losses)
 Gains (Losses)
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
 Gains (Losses)
Included in Effectiveness Testing
  Gains (Losses) Ineffectiveness
Recognized for Fair Value Hedge
2015:          
Foreign currency
forwards
Fixed-maturity securities $(133) $(136) $3
 $(5) $(2)
Foreign currency
options
Fixed-maturity securities (4) 3
 (7) 7
 0
Interest rate
swaptions
Fixed-maturity securities (95) 19
 (114) 99
 (15)
2014:       
Foreign currency forwardsFixed-maturity securities $(1,835) $(38) $(1,797) $1,819
 $22
Foreign currency optionsFixed-maturity securities (41) (4) (37) 38
 1
Interest rate
swaptions
Fixed-maturity securities (318) (36) (282) 316
 34
2013:       
Foreign currency
forwards
Fixed-maturity securities $(1,735) $(25) $(1,710) $1,700
 $(10)
Interest rate
swaptions
Fixed-maturity securities 17
 17
 0
 0
 0


(In millions)
Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets/(Liabilities)(1)
 Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of Hedged Assets/(Liabilities)
  2018   2018 
Fixed maturity securities $6,593
   $294
 
(1) The balance includes $294 million of hedging adjustment on discontinued hedging relationships.
As of December 31, 2018, the total notional amount of the Company's interest rate swaptions was $500 million. The hedging adjustment related to these derivatives was immaterial.

Net Investment Hedge


Our primary exposure to be hedged is our netThe Company's investment in Aflac Japan which is affected by changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate. To mitigate this exposure, we have designated the Parent Company's yen-denominated liabilities (Samurai and Uridashi notes - see(see Note 9) have been designated as non-derivative hedges and, designatedprior to April 1, 2018, foreign currency forwards and options were designated as derivative hedges of the foreign currency exposure of ourthe Company's net investment in Aflac Japan.

We used foreign exchange forwards and options to hedge foreign exchange risk on 30.0 billion yen, 102.5 billion yen, 25.0 billion yen, and 85.0 billion yen of profit repatriation received from Aflac Japan in February 2015, July 2015, September 2015, and December 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, we had entered into foreign exchange forwards and options as part of a hedge on 124.1 billion yen of future profit repatriation.

Our The Company designated net investment hedge was effective forhedges under this strategy during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016.
Non-qualifying Strategies
For ourthe Company's derivative instruments in consolidated VIEs that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, all changes in their fair value are reported in current period earnings within derivative and otherrealized investment gains (losses). The amount of gain or loss recognized in earnings for ourthe Company's VIEs is attributable to the derivatives in those investment structures. While the change in value of the swaps is recorded through current period earnings, the change in value of the available-for-sale fixed maturity or perpetual securities associated with these swaps is recorded through other comprehensive income.
We haveAs of December 31, 2018, the Parent Company had cross-currency interest rate swap agreements related to our $400 million senior notes due February 2017, $550 million senior notes due March 2020,its $350 million senior notes due February 2022, $700 million senior notes due June

121



2023, $750 million senior notes due November 2024 and $450 million senior notes due March 2025, and $500 million subordinated debentures due September 2052.2025. Changes in the values of these swaps are recorded through current period earnings. For additional information regarding these swaps, see Note 9.

The Company uses foreign exchange forwards and options to economically mitigate the currency risk of some of its U.S. dollar- denominated loan receivables held within the Aflac Japan segment. These arrangements are not designated as accounting hedges, as the foreign currency remeasurement of the loan receivables impacts current period earnings, and generally offsets gains and losses from foreign exchange forwards within realized investment gains (losses). The Company also has certain foreign exchange forwards on U.S. dollar-denominated AFS securities where hedge accounting is not being applied.
In order to economically mitigate currency risk of future yen dividends from Aflac Japan while lowering consolidated hedge costs associated with Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar investment hedging the Parent Company entered into offsetting hedge positions using foreign exchange forwards. This activity is reported in the Corporate and other segment.

The Company uses interest rate swaps to economically convert the variable rate investment income to a fixed rate on certain variable-rate investments.


131




Impact of Derivatives and Hedging Instruments


The following table summarizes the impact to realized investment gains (losses) and other comprehensive income (loss) from all derivatives and hedging instruments for the years ended December 31.
201520142013201820172016
(In millions)Realized Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(1)
Realized Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(1)
Realized
Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(1)
Realized Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(1)
Realized Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(1)
Realized
Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(1)
Qualifying hedges:                          
Cash flow hedges:                          
Foreign currency swaps $0
 $0
 $(2) $(17) $(2) $(10)  $0
 $3
 $0
 $1
 $1
 $3
 
Total cash flow hedges 0
 0
 (2) (17) (2) (10)  0
(2) 
 3
 0
(2) 
 1
 1
(2) 
 3
 
Fair value hedges:                          
Foreign currency forwards (2)(3)
 (138) 0
 (16) 0
 (35) 0
  (116)   (180)   (359)   
Foreign currency options (2)
 3
 0
 (3) 0
 0
 0
 
Foreign currency options (3)
 4
   11
   (25)   
Interest rate swaptions (2)(3)
 4
 0
 (2) 0
 17
 0
  0
 (1) 0
 0
 0
 0
 
Total fair value hedges (131) 0
 (21) 0
 (18) 0
  (112) (1) (169) 0
 (384) 0
 
Net investment hedge:                          
Non-derivative hedging
instruments
 0
 3
 0
 39
 0
 155
  0
 (32) 0
 (15) 0
 0
 
Foreign currency swaps 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 (104) 
Foreign currency forwards 0
 4
 0
 89
 0
 24
  0
 0
 0
 (25) 0
 (118) 
Foreign currency options 0
 0
 0
 (3) 0
 4
  0
 (8) 0
 5
 0
 73
 
Total net investment hedge 0
 7
 0
 125
 0
 79
  0
 (40) 0
 (35) 0
 (45) 
Non-qualifying strategies:                          
Foreign currency swaps 16
 0
 151
 0
 346
 0
  20
   53
   117
   
Foreign currency forwards 100
 0
 (11) 0
 0
 0
  (135)   8
   9
   
Foreign currency options 0
 0
 0
 0
 11
 0
 
Credit default swaps 1
 0
 3
 0
 31
 0
  0
   (1)   2
   
Interest rate swaps 5
 0
 (1) 0
 (8) 0
  3
   0
   0
   
Interest rate swaptions 0
 0
 1
 0
 (29) 0
 
Futures (1) 0
 (89) 0
 (5) 0
 
Total non- qualifying strategies 121
 0
 54
 0
 346
 0
  (112)   60
   128
   
Total $(10) $7
 $31
 $108
 $326
 $69
  $(224) $(38) $(109) $(34) $(255) $(42) 
(1) Cash flow hedge items and the change in the fair value of interest rate swaptions related to the time value of the swaptions in fair value hedges are recorded as unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives and net investment hedge items are recorded in the unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) line in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss).
(2) Impact of cash flow hedges reported as realized investment gains (losses) includes an immaterial amount of gains or losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings. It also includes an immaterial amount excluded from effectiveness testing during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.
(3)Impact shown net of effect of hedged items (see Fair Value Hedges section of this Note 4 for further detail)


The impact on earnings from derivatives in cash flow hedge relationships also included a loss of $2 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 and an immaterial amount during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 resulting from reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to net investment income. There was no gain or loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings related to our designated cash flow hedges andthe net investment hedge for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016. As of December 31, 2015,2018, deferred gains and losses on derivative instruments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income that are expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next twelve months were immaterial.


Credit Risk Assumed through Derivatives

For the foreign currency and credit default swaps associated with the Company's VIE investments for which it is the primary beneficiary, the Company bears the risk of loss due to counterparty default even though it is not a direct counterparty to those contracts.

The Company is a direct counterparty to the foreign currency swaps that it has entered into in connection with certain of its senior notes and subordinated debentures; foreign currency forwards; and foreign currency options, and therefore the Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties in those contracts. The risk of counterparty default for the Company's foreign currency swaps, certain foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options is mitigated by collateral posting requirements that counterparties to those transactions must meet.


132




As of December 31, 2018, there were 16 counterparties to the Company's derivative agreements, with three comprising 52% of the aggregate notional amount. The counterparties to these derivatives are financial institutions with the following credit ratings as of December 31:
 20182017
(In millions)Notional Amount
of Derivatives
Asset Derivatives
Fair Value
Liability Derivatives
Fair Value
Notional Amount
of Derivatives
Asset Derivatives
Fair Value
Liability Derivatives
Fair Value
Counterparties' credit rating:                  
AA $5,399
  $63
  $(23)  $4,708
  $52
  $(37) 
A 32,513
  350
  (311)  20,604
  271
  (370) 
BBB 443
  4
  (53)  439
  8
  (67) 
Total $38,355
  $417
  $(387)  $25,751
  $331
  $(474) 


The Company engages in over-the-counter (OTC) bilateral derivative transactions directly with unaffiliated third parties under International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) agreements and other documentation. Most of the ISDA agreements also include Credit Support Annexes (CSAs) provisions, which generally provide for two-way collateral postings at the first dollar of exposure. The Company mitigates the risk that counterparties to transactions might be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations by monitoring counterparty credit exposure and collateral value while generally requiring that collateral be posted at the outset of the transaction. In addition, a significant portion of the derivative transactions have provisions that give the counterparty the right to terminate the transaction upon a downgrade of Aflac’s financial strength rating. The actual amount of payments that the Company could be required to make depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions, and other factors prevailing at and after the time of the downgrade.

The Company also engages in OTC cleared derivative transactions through regulated central clearing counterparties. These positions are marked to market and margined on a daily basis (both initial margin and variation margin), and the Company has minimal exposure to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these derivatives.

Collateral posted by the Company to third parties for derivative transactions can generally be repledged or resold by the counterparties. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position by counterparty was approximately $139 million and $264 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. If the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on December 31, 2018, the Company estimates that it would be required to post a maximum of $34 million of additional collateral to these derivative counterparties. The Company is generally allowed to sell or repledge collateral obtained from its derivative counterparties, although it does not typically exercise such rights. (See the Offsetting tables below for collateral posted or received as of the reported balance sheet dates.)

Offsetting of Financial Instruments and Derivatives


SomeMost of the Company's derivative instruments are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements that provide for the net settlement of all derivative contracts between the Parent Company or Aflac and its respective counterparty in the event of default or upon the occurrence of certain termination events. Collateral support agreements with certain of the master netting arrangements generally provide that the Company will receive or pledge financial collateral inat the event either minimum thresholds, or in certain cases ratings levels, have been reached.first dollar of exposure.


We haveThe Company has securities lending agreements with unaffiliated financial institutions that post collateral to usthe Company in return for the use of ourits fixed maturity and public equity securities (see Note 3). When we havethe Company has entered into securities lending agreements with the same counterparty, the agreements generally provide for net settlement in the event of default by the counterparty. This right of

122



set-off would allow usallows the Company to keep and apply collateral received if the counterparty failed to return the securities borrowed from usthe Company as contractually agreed. For additional information on the Company's accounting policy for securities lending, see
Note 1.


The tables below summarize ourthe Company's derivatives and securities lending transactions as of December 31, and as reflected in the tables, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, ourthe Company's policy is to not offset these financial instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.



133




Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets
2018
   Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Assets 
Gross Amount
Offset in
Balance Sheet
 
Net Amount of Assets Presented
 in Balance Sheet
 Financial Instruments 
Securities
Collateral
 Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivative
  assets:
                         
    Derivative
      assets subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
 
   
   
   
  

  
   
 
          OTC - bilateral $231
   $0
   $231
   $(152)  $(23)  $(55)   $1
 
          OTC - cleared 3
   0
   3
   0
  0
  (3)   0
 
    Total derivative
assets subject to a
master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 234
   0
   234
   (152)  (23)  (58)   1
 
    Derivative
      assets not subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
 
   
   
   
  

  
   
 
          OTC - bilateral 183
       183
             183
 
    Total derivative
assets not subject
to a master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 183
       183
             183
 
    Total derivative
      assets
 417
   0
   417
   (152)  (23)  (58)   184
 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
 1,029
   0
   1,029
   0
  0
  (1,029)   0
 
    Total $1,446
   $0
   $1,446
   $(152)  $(23)  $(1,087)   $184
 



134



2015
   Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Assets 
Gross Amount
Offset in
Balance Sheet
 Net Amount of Assets Presented in Balance Sheet Carrying Value of Financial Instruments Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivative assets:                      
Foreign currency swaps $563
   $0
   $563
   $0
  $(313)   $250
 
Foreign currency forwards 107
   0
   107
   0
  (96)   11
 
Foreign currency options 5
   0
   5
   0
  (3)   2
 
Credit default swaps 1
   0
   1
   0
  0
   1
 
    Total derivative assets,
       subject to a master
       netting arrangement
       or offsetting
       arrangement
 676
   0
   676
   0
  (412)
(1) 
  264
 
Securities lending and
   similar arrangements
 921
   0
   921
   0
  (921)   0
 
    Total $1,597
   $0
   $1,597
   $0
  $(1,333)   $264
 
(1) Consists of $86 of pledged securities and $326 of cash.
2017
   Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Assets Gross Amount Offset in Balance Sheet Net Amount of Assets Presented in Balance Sheet 
Financial
Instruments
Securities CollateralCash Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivative
  assets:
                         
    Derivative
      assets subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
 

   

   

   

  

  

   
 
          OTC - bilateral $180
   $0
   $180
   $(82)  $0
  $(98)   $0
 
    Total derivative
assets subject to a
master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 180
   0
   180
   (82)  0
  (98)   0
 
    Derivative
      assets not subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
 

       

   

  

  

   
 
          OTC - bilateral 151
       151
             151
 
    Total derivative
assets not subject
to a master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 151
       151
             151
 
    Total derivative
      assets
 331
   0
   331
   (82)  0
  (98)   151
 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
 592
   0
   592
   0
  0
  (592)   0
 
    Total $923
   $0
   $923
   $(82)  $0
  $(690)   $151
 




135



2014
   Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Assets Gross Amount Offset in Balance Sheet Net Amount of Assets Presented in Balance Sheet Carrying Value of Financial Instruments Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivative assets:                      
Foreign currency swaps $746
   $0
   $746
   $0
  $(568)   $178
 
Foreign currency forwards 56
   0
   56
   0
  (51)   5
 
    Total derivative assets,
       subject to a master
       netting arrangement
       or offsetting
       arrangement
 802
   0
   802
   0
  (619)
(1) 
  183
 
Securities lending and
   similar arrangements
 2,149
   0
   2,149
   0
  (2,149)   0
 
    Total $2,951
   $0
   $2,951
   $0
  $(2,768)   $183
 

(1) Consists of $153 of pledged securities and $466 of cash.


123





Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities
2018
   
Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amount Offset in Balance Sheet Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in Balance Sheet Financial Instruments Securities Collateral Cash Collateral Pledged Net Amount
Derivative
  liabilities:
                         
    Derivative
      liabilities subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
 

   

   

   

  

  

   

 
          OTC - bilateral $(285)   $0
   $(285)   $152
  $37
  $68
   $(28) 
    Total derivative
liabilities subject
to a master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 (285)   0
   (285)   152
  37
  68
   (28) 
    Derivative
      liabilities not
      subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
 

       

             

 
          OTC - bilateral (102)       (102)             (102) 
    Total derivative
liabilities not
subject to a
master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 (102)       (102)             (102) 
    Total derivative
      liabilities
 (387)   0
   (387)   152
  37
  68
   (130) 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
 (1,052)   0
   (1,052)   1,029
  0
  0
   (23) 
    Total $(1,439)   $0
   $(1,439)   $1,181
  $37
  $68
   $(153) 



136



2015
   
Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amount Offset in Balance Sheet Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in Balance Sheet Carrying Value of Financial Instruments Collateral Pledged Net Amount
Derivative liabilities:                      
Foreign currency swaps $(314)   $0
   $(314)   $0
  $1
   $(313) 
Foreign currency forwards (49)   0
   (49)   0
  18
   (31) 
Foreign currency options (8)   0
   (8)   0
  1
   (7) 
    Total derivative liabilities,
       subject to a master
       netting arrangement
       or offsetting
       arrangement
 (371)   0
   (371)   0
  20
(1) 
  (351) 
Securities lending and
   similar arrangements
 (941)   0
   (941)   921
  0
   (20) 
    Total $(1,312)   $0
   $(1,312)   $921
  $20
   $(371) 
(1) Consists of $17 of pledged securities and $3 of cash.
2017
   Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amount Offset in Balance Sheet Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in Balance Sheet Financial Instruments Securities Collateral Cash Collateral Pledged Net Amount
Derivative
  liabilities:
                         
    Derivative
      liabilities subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
 

   

   

   

  

  

   
 
          OTC - bilateral $(346)   $0
   $(346)   $82
  $245
  $10
   $(9) 
    Total derivative
liabilities subject
to a master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 (346)   0
   (346)   82
  245
  10
   (9) 
    Derivative
      liabilities not
      subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
 

       

             
 
          OTC - bilateral (128)       (128)             (128) 
    Total derivative
liabilities not
subject to a
master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 (128)       (128)             (128) 
    Total derivative
      liabilities
 (474)   0
   (474)   82
  245
  10
   (137) 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
 (606)   0
   (606)   592
  0
  0
   (14) 
    Total $(1,080)   $0
   $(1,080)   $674
  $245
  $10
   $(151) 

2014
   Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amount Offset in Balance Sheet Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in Balance Sheet Carrying Value of Financial Instruments Collateral Pledged Net Amount
Derivative liabilities:                      
Foreign currency swaps $(318)   $0
   $(318)   $0
  $0
   $(318) 
Foreign currency forwards (1,912)   0
   (1,912)   0
  1,439
   (473) 
Foreign currency options (33)   0
   (33)   0
  24
   (9) 
Interest rate swaptions (160)   0
   (160)   0
  158
   (2) 
    Total derivative liabilities,
       subject to a master
       netting arrangement
       or offsetting
       arrangement
 (2,423)   0
   (2,423)   0
  1,621
(1) 
  (802) 
Securities lending and
   similar arrangements
 (2,193)   0
   (2,193)   2,149
 ��0
   (44) 
    Total $(4,616)   $0
   $(4,616)   $2,149
  $1,621
   $(846) 
(1) Consists entirely of pledged securities.


For additional information on ourthe Company's financial instruments, see the accompanying Notes 1, 3 and 5.


5.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Hierarchy


U.S. GAAP specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. These two types of inputs create three valuation hierarchy levels. Level 1 valuations reflect quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 valuations reflect quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted market prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets or model-derived valuations in which all significant valuation inputs are observable in active markets. Level 3 valuations reflect valuations in which one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in an active market.


The following tables present the fair value hierarchy levels of the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31.


124137





  2015
(In millions)Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Assets:               
Securities available for sale, carried at
fair value:
               
  Fixed maturities:               
Government and agencies $18,669
   $607
   $0
   $19,276
 
Municipalities 0
   1,208
   0
   1,208
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 0
   362
   220
   582
 
Public utilities 0
   7,479
   0
   7,479
 
Sovereign and supranational 0
   1,407
   0
   1,407
 
Banks/financial institutions 0
   5,993
   26
   6,019
 
Other corporate 0
   29,378
   0
   29,378
 
Total fixed maturities 18,669
   46,434
   246
   65,349
 
  Perpetual securities:               
Banks/financial institutions 0
   1,742
   0
   1,742
 
Other corporate 0
   205
   0
   205
 
Total perpetual securities 0
   1,947
   0
   1,947
 
Equity securities 489
   6
   3
   498
 
Other assets:               
Foreign currency swaps 0
   462
   101
   563
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   107
   0
   107
 
Foreign currency options 0
   5
   0
   5
 
Credit default swaps 0
   0
   1
   1
 
Total other assets 0
   574
   102
   676
 
Other investments 176
   0
   0
   176
 
Cash and cash equivalents 4,350
   0
   0
   4,350
 
Total assets $23,684
   $48,961
   $351
   $72,996
 
Liabilities:               
Foreign currency swaps $0
   $21
   $293
   $314
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   49
   0
   49
 
Foreign currency options 0
   8
   0
   8
 
Total liabilities $0
   $78
   $293
   $371
 

  2018
(In millions)Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Assets:               
Securities available for sale, carried at
fair value:
               
Fixed maturity securities: (1)
               
Government and agencies $32,993
   $1,349
   $0
   $34,342
 
Municipalities 0
   1,863
   0
   1,863
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 0
   162
   177
   339
 
Public utilities 0
   7,062
   109
   7,171
 
Sovereign and supranational 0
   1,260
   0
   1,260
 
Banks/financial institutions 0
   8,895
   23
   8,918
 
Other corporate 0
   28,789
   213
   29,002
 
Total fixed maturity securities 32,993
   49,380
   522
   82,895
(1) 
Equity securities (1)
 874
   67
   46
   987
(1) 
Other investments 152
   0
   0
   152
 
Cash and cash equivalents 4,337
   0
   0
   4,337
 
Other assets:               
Foreign currency swaps 0
   103
   182
   285
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   126
   0
   126
 
Foreign currency options 0
   3
   0
   3
 
Interest rate swaps 0
   3
   0
   3
 
Total other assets 0
   235
   182
   417
 
Total assets $38,356
   $49,682
   $750
   $88,788
 
Liabilities:               
Other liabilities:               
Foreign currency swaps $0
   $132
   $102
   $234
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   151
   0
   151
 
Foreign currency options 0
   1
   0
   1
 
Interest rate swaptions 0
   1
   0
   1
 
Total liabilities $0
   $285
   $102
   $387
 


(1) Includes perpetual securities





125138





  2014
(In millions)Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Assets:               
Securities available for sale, carried at
fair value:
               
  Fixed maturities:               
Government and agencies $18,683
   $515
   $0
   $19,198
 
Municipalities 0
   1,257
   0
   1,257
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 0
   379
   223
   602
 
Public utilities 0
   7,897
   0
   7,897
 
Sovereign and supranational 0
   1,416
   0
   1,416
 
Banks/financial institutions 0
   6,572
   26
   6,598
 
Other corporate 0
   28,605
   0
   28,605
 
Total fixed maturities 18,683
   46,641
   249
   65,573
 
  Perpetual securities:               
Banks/financial institutions 0
   2,289
   149
   2,438
 
Other corporate 0
   231
   0
   231
 
Total perpetual securities 0
   2,520
   149
   2,669
 
Equity securities 19
   6
   3
   28
 
Other assets:               
Foreign currency swaps 0
   640
   106
   746
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   56
   0
   56
 
Total other assets 0
   696
   106
   802
 
Other investments 171
   0
   0
   171
 
Cash and cash equivalents 4,658
   0
   0
   4,658
 
Total assets $23,531
   $49,863
   $507
   $73,901
 
Liabilities:               
Foreign currency swaps $0
   $0
   $318
   $318
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   1,912
   0
   1,912
 
Foreign currency options 0
   33
   0
   33
 
Interest rate swaptions 0
   160
   0
   160
 
Total liabilities $0
   $2,105
   $318
   $2,423
 


  2017
(In millions)Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Assets:               
Securities available for sale, carried at
fair value:
               
Fixed maturity securities: (1)
               
Government and agencies $30,109
   $1,121
   $0
   $31,230
 
Municipalities 0
   1,370
   0
   1,370
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 0
   269
   175
   444
 
Public utilities 0
   7,886
   68
   7,954
 
Sovereign and supranational 0
   1,909
   0
   1,909
 
Banks/financial institutions 0
   8,908
   25
   8,933
 
Other corporate 0
   32,327
   146
   32,473
 
Total fixed maturity securities 30,109
   53,790
   414
   84,313
(1) 
Equity securities 1,001
   6
   16
   1,023
 
Other investments 57
   0
   0
   57
 
Cash and cash equivalents 3,491
   0
   0
   3,491
 
Other assets:               
Foreign currency swaps 0
   146
   150
   296
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   22
   0
   22
 
Foreign currency options 0
   12
   0
   12
 
Credit default swaps 0
   0
   1
   1
 
Total other assets 0
   180
   151
   331
 
Total assets $34,658
   $53,976
   $581
   $89,215
 
Liabilities:               
Other liabilities:               
Foreign currency swaps $0
   $69
   $128
   $197
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   274
   0
   274
 
Foreign currency options 0
   3
   0
   3
 
Total liabilities $0
   $346
   $128
   $474
 


(1) Includes perpetual securities


126139






The following tables present the carrying amount and fair value categorized by fair value hierarchy level for the Company's financial instruments that are not carried at fair value as of December 31.
20152018
(In millions)Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
 Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
 
Assets:                      
Securities held to maturity,
carried at amortized cost:
                      
Fixed maturities:           
Fixed maturity securities:           
Government and agencies $20,004
 $23,391
 $0
 $0
 $23,391
  $21,712
 $27,030
 $8
 $0
 $27,038
 
Municipalities 341
 0
 415
 0
 415
  359
 0
 469
 0
 469
 
Mortgage and asset-backed
securities
 36
 0
 12
 26
 38
  14
 0
 0
 15
 15
 
Public utilities 3,092
 0
 3,203
 0
 3,203
  2,727
 0
 2,973
 0
 2,973
 
Sovereign and
supranational
 2,555
 0
 2,711
 0
 2,711
  1,551
 0
 1,840
 0
 1,840
 
Banks/financial institutions 4,431
 0
 4,546
 0
 4,546
  1,445
 0
 1,583
 0
 1,583
 
Other corporate 3,000
 0
 3,216
 0
 3,216
  2,510
 0
 2,804
 0
 2,804
 
Other investments(1) 118
 0
 0
 118
 118
  6,945
 0
 26
 6,893
 6,919
 
Total assets $33,577
 $23,391
 $14,103
 $144
 $37,638
  $37,263
 $27,030
 $9,703
 $6,908
 $43,641
 
Liabilities:                      
Other policyholders’ funds $6,285
 $0
 $0
 $6,160
 $6,160
  $7,146
 $0
 $0
 $7,067
 $7,067
 
Notes payable
(excluding capital leases)
 4,991
 0
 0
 5,285
 5,285
  5,765
 0
 5,606
 270
 5,876
 
Total liabilities $11,276
 $0
 $0
 $11,445
 $11,445
  $12,911
 $0
 $5,606
 $7,337
 $12,943
 

(1)Excludes policy loans of $232 and equity method investments of $377, at carrying value



127140




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

    2014
(In millions)Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Assets:                  
Securities held to maturity,
carried at amortized cost:
                  
  Fixed maturities:                  
Government and agencies $20,023
  $23,218
   $0
   $0
   $23,218
 
Municipalities 346
  0
   417
   0
   417
 
Mortgage and asset-backed
securities
 43
  0
   15
   31
 �� 46
 
Public utilities 3,342
  0
   3,603
   0
   3,603
 
Sovereign and
supranational
 2,556
  0
   2,814
   0
   2,814
 
Banks/financial institutions 4,932
  0
   5,085
   0
   5,085
 
Other corporate 3,000
  0
   3,314
   0
   3,314
 
  Total assets $34,242
  $23,218
   $15,248
   $31
   $38,497
 
Liabilities:                  
Other policyholders’ funds $6,031
  $0
   $0
   $5,905
   $5,905
 
Notes payable
(excluding capital leases)
 5,268
  0
   0
   5,835
   5,835
 
Total liabilities $11,299
  $0
   $0
   $11,740
   $11,740
 


    2017
(In millions)Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Assets:                  
Securities held to maturity,
carried at amortized cost:
                  
  Fixed maturity securities:                  
Government and agencies $21,331
  $26,491
   $0
   $0
   $26,491
 
Municipalities 357
  0
   462
   0
   462
 
Mortgage and asset-backed
securities
 26
  0
   8
   19
   27
 
Public utilities 3,300
  0
   3,698
   0
   3,698
 
Sovereign and
supranational
 1,523
  0
   1,835
   0
   1,835
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,206
  0
   2,387
   0
   2,387
 
Other corporate 2,687
  0
   3,172
   0
   3,172
 
Other investments (1)
 3,017
  0
   15
   2,987
   3,002
 
  Total assets $34,447
  $26,491
   $11,577
   $3,006
   $41,074
 
Liabilities:                  
Other policyholders’ funds $6,939
  $0
   $0
   $6,841
   $6,841
 
Notes payable
(excluding capital leases)
 5,267
  0
   5,288
   265
   5,553
 
Total liabilities $12,206
  $0
   $5,288
   $7,106
   $12,394
 

(1)Excludes policy loans of $210 and equity method investments of $118, at carrying value

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

U.S. GAAP requires disclosure of the fair value of certain financial instruments including those that are not carried at fair value. The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, other investments, receivables, accrued investment income, accounts payable, cash collateral and payables for security transactions approximated their fair values due to the nature of these instruments. Liabilities for future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims are not financial instruments as defined by U.S. GAAP.


Fixed maturities, perpetual securities,maturity and equity securities


We determineThe Company determines the fair values of our fixed maturity securities, perpetual securities and public and privately issuedprivately-issued equity securities using the following approaches or techniques: price quotes and valuations from third party pricing vendors (including quoted market prices readily available from public exchange markets) and non-binding price quotes we obtainthe Company obtains from outside brokers.


A third party pricing vendor has developed valuation models to determine fair values of privately issued securities to reflect the impact of the persistent economic environment and the changing regulatory framework. These models are discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation models, but also use information from related markets, specifically the CDS market to estimate expected cash flows. These models take into consideration any unique characteristics of the securities and make various adjustments to arrive at an appropriate issuer-specific loss adjusted credit curve.This credit curve is then used with the relevant recovery rates to estimate expected cash flows and modeling of additional features, including illiquidity adjustments, if necessary, to price the security by discounting those loss adjusted cash flows. In cases where a credit curve cannot be developed from the specific security features, the valuation methodology takes into consideration other market observable inputs, including: 1) the most appropriate comparable security(ies) of the issuer; 2) issuer-specific CDS spreads; 3) bonds or CDS spreads of comparable issuers with similar characteristics such as rating, geography, or sector; or 4) bond indices that are comparative in rating, industry, maturity and region.


The pricing data and market quotes we obtainthe Company obtains from outside sources, including third party pricing services, are reviewed internally for reasonableness. If a fair value appears unreasonable, wethe Company will re-examine the inputs and assess the reasonableness of the pricing data with the vendor. Additionally, wethe Company may compare the inputs to relevant market indices

128



and other performance measurements. The output of this analysis is presented to the Company's Valuation and Classifications Subcommittee, or VCS. Based on themanagement's analysis, provided to the VCS, the valuation is confirmed or may be revised if there is evidence of a more appropriate estimate of fair value based on available market data. We haveThe Company has performed verification of the inputs and calculations in any valuation models to confirm that the valuations represent reasonable estimates of fair value.


141


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data



The fixed maturitiesmaturity securities classified as Level 3 consist of securities for which there arewith limited or no observable valuation inputs. For Level 3 securities, that are investment grade, we estimatethe Company estimates the fair value of these securities by obtaining non-binding broker quotes from a limited number of brokers. These brokers base their quotes on a combination of their knowledge of the current pricing environment and market conditions. We considerThe Company considers these inputs to be unobservable. For Level 3 investments that are below-investment-grade securities, we considerThe Company also considers a variety of significant valuation inputs in the valuation process, including forward exchange rates, yen swap rates, dollar swap rates, interest rate volatilities, credit spread data on specific issuers, assumed default and default recovery rates, and certain probability assumptions. In obtaining these valuation inputs, we havethe Company has determined that certain pricing assumptions and data used by ourits pricing sources are difficult to validate or corroborate by the market and/or appear to be internally developed rather than observed in or corroborated by the market. The use of these unobservable valuation inputs causes more subjectivity in the valuation process for these securities.


For the periods presented, we havethe Company has not adjusted the quotes or prices we obtainit obtains from the pricing services and brokers we use.it uses.


The following tables present the pricing sources for the fair values of ourthe Company's fixed maturities, perpetual securities,maturity and equity securities as of December 31.


129142




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  2015
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:                
      Fixed maturities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $18,669
   $607
   $0
   $19,276
 
               Total government and agencies  18,669
   607
   0
   19,276
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,208
   0
   1,208
 
               Total municipalities  0
   1,208
   0
   1,208
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   362
   0
   362
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   220
   220
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   362
   220
   582
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   7,479
   0
   7,479
 
               Total public utilities  0
   7,479
   0
   7,479
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,407
   0
   1,407
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,407
   0
   1,407
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   5,993
   0
   5,993
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   26
   26
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   5,993
   26
   6,019
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   29,378
   0
   29,378
 
               Total other corporate  0
   29,378
   0
   29,378
 
                  Total fixed maturities  18,669
   46,434
   246
   65,349
 
      Perpetual securities:                
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,742
   0
   1,742
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   1,742
   0
   1,742
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   205
   0
   205
 
               Total other corporate  0
   205
   0
   205
 
                  Total perpetual securities  0
   1,947
   0
   1,947
 
      Equity securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  489
   6
   0
   495
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   3
   3
 
               Total equity securities  489
   6
   3
   498
 
                     Total securities available for sale  $19,158
   $48,387
   $249
   $67,794
 


  2018
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:                
      Fixed maturity securities: (1)
                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $32,993
   $1,349
   $0
   $34,342
 
               Total government and agencies  32,993
   1,349
   0
   34,342
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,863
   0
   1,863
 
               Total municipalities  0
   1,863
   0
   1,863
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   162
   0
   162
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   177
   177
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   162
   177
   339
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   7,062
   0
   7,062
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   109
   109
 
               Total public utilities  0
   7,062
   109
   7,171
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,260
   0
   1,260
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,260
   0
   1,260
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   8,895
   0
   8,895
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   23
   23
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   8,895
   23
   8,918
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   28,789
   0
   28,789
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   213
   213
 
               Total other corporate  0
   28,789
   213
   29,002
 
                  Total securities available for sale  $32,993
   $49,380
   $522
   $82,895
(1) 
Equity securities, carried at fair value: (1)
                
            Third party pricing vendor  $874
   $67
   $0
   $941
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   46
   46
 
               Total equity securities  $874
   $67
   $46
   $987
(1) 


(1) Includes perpetual securities


130143




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  2015
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:                
      Fixed maturities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $23,391
   $0
   $0
   $23,391
 
               Total government and agencies  23,391
   0
   0
   23,391
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   415
   0
   415
 
               Total municipalities  0
   415
   0
   415
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   12
   0
   12
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   26
   26
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   12
   26
   38
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   3,203
   0
   3,203
 
               Total public utilities  0
   3,203
   0
   3,203
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,711
   0
   2,711
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   2,711
   0
   2,711
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   4,546
   0
   4,546
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   4,546
   0
   4,546
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   3,189
   0
   3,189
 
            Broker/other  0
   27
   0
   27
 
               Total other corporate  0
   3,216
   0
   3,216
 
                  Total securities held to maturity  $23,391
   $14,103
   $26
   $37,520
 


131
  2018
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:                
      Fixed maturity securities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $27,030
   $8
   $0
   $27,038
 
               Total government and agencies  27,030
   8
   0
   27,038
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   469
   0
   469
 
               Total municipalities  0
   469
   0
   469
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Broker/other  0
   0
   15
   15
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   0
   15
   15
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,973
   0
   2,973
 
               Total public utilities  0
   2,973
   0
   2,973
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,840
   0
   1,840
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,840
   0
   1,840
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,583
   0
   1,583
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   1,583
   0
   1,583
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,804
   0
   2,804
 
               Total other corporate  0
   2,804
   0
   2,804
 
                  Total securities held to maturity  $27,030
   $9,677
   $15
   $36,722
 



144



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  2014
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:                
      Fixed maturities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $18,683
   $515
   $0
   $19,198
 
               Total government and agencies  18,683
   515
   0
   19,198
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,257
   0
   1,257
 
               Total municipalities  0
   1,257
   0
   1,257
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   379
   0
   379
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   223
   223
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   379
   223
   602
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   7,897
   0
   7,897
 
               Total public utilities  0
   7,897
   0
   7,897
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,416
   0
   1,416
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,416
   0
   1,416
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   6,514
   0
   6,514
 
            Broker/other  0
   58
   26
   84
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   6,572
   26
   6,598
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   28,605
   0
   28,605
 
               Total other corporate  0
   28,605
   0
   28,605
 
                  Total fixed maturities  18,683
   46,641
   249
   65,573
 
      Perpetual securities:                
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,289
   0
   2,289
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   149
   149
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   2,289
   149
   2,438
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   231
   0
   231
 
               Total other corporate  0
   231
   0
   231
 
                  Total perpetual securities  0
   2,520
   149
   2,669
 
      Equity securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  19
   6
   0
   25
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   3
   3
 
               Total equity securities  19
   6
   3
   28
 
                     Total securities available for sale  $18,702
   $49,167
   $401
   $68,270
 


132
  2017
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:                
      Fixed maturity securities: (1)
                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $30,109
   $1,121
   $0
   $31,230
 
               Total government and agencies  30,109
   1,121
   0
   31,230
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,370
   0
   1,370
 
               Total municipalities  0
   1,370
   0
   1,370
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   269
   0
   269
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   175
   175
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   269
   175
   444
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   7,886
   0
   7,886
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   68
   68
 
               Total public utilities  0
   7,886
   68
   7,954
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,807
   0
   1,807
 
            Broker/other  0
   102
   0
   102
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,909
   0
   1,909
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   8,908
   0
   8,908
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   25
   25
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   8,908
   25
   8,933
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   32,327
   0
   32,327
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   146
   146
 
               Total other corporate  0
   32,327
   146
   32,473
 
                  Total securities available for sale  $30,109
   $53,790
   $414
   $84,313
(1) 
Equity securities, carried at fair value:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $1,001
   $6
   $0
   $1,007
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   16
   16
 
               Total equity securities  $1,001
   $6
   $16
   $1,023
 


(1) Includes perpetual securities


145



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  2014
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:                
      Fixed maturities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $23,218
   $0
   $0
   $23,218
 
               Total government and agencies  23,218
   0
   0
   23,218
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   417
   0
   417
 
               Total municipalities  0
   417
   0
   417
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   15
   0
   15
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   31
   31
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   15
   31
   46
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   3,603
   0
   3,603
 
               Total public utilities  0
   3,603
   0
   3,603
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,814
   0
   2,814
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   2,814
   0
   2,814
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   5,085
   0
   5,085
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   5,085
   0
   5,085
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   3,287
   0
   3,287
 
            Broker/other  0
   27
   0
   27
 
               Total other corporate  0
   3,314
   0
   3,314
 
                  Total securities held to maturity  $23,218
   $15,248
   $31
   $38,497
 


133
  2017
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:                
      Fixed maturity securities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $26,491
   $0
   $0
   $26,491
 
               Total government and agencies  26,491
   0
   0
   26,491
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   462
   0
   462
 
               Total municipalities  0
   462
   0
   462
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   8
   0
   8
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   19
   19
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   8
   19
   27
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   3,698
   0
   3,698
 
               Total public utilities  0
   3,698
   0
   3,698
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,835
   0
   1,835
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,835
   0
   1,835
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,387
   0
   2,387
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   2,387
   0
   2,387
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   3,172
   0
   3,172
 
               Total other corporate  0
   3,172
   0
   3,172
 
                  Total securities held to maturity  $26,491
   $11,562
   $19
   $38,072
 





The following is a discussion of the determination of fair value of ourthe Company's remaining financial instruments.


Derivatives


We useThe Company uses derivative instruments to manage the risk associated with certain assets. However, the derivative instrument may not be classified in the same fair value hierarchy level as the associated asset. The Company uses pricing models to determine the estimated fair value of derivatives. Inputs used to value derivatives include, but are not limited to, interest rates, credit spreads, foreign currency forward and spot rates, and interest volatility. The significant inputs to pricing derivatives are generally observable in the market or can be derived by observable market data. When these inputs are observable, the derivatives are classified as Level 2.


The fair values of the foreign currency forwards options, and interest rate swaptionsoptions associated with certain fixed-maturity securities;investments; the foreign currency forwards and options used to hedge foreign exchange risk from ourthe Company's net investment in Aflac Japan and economically hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in yen; and the foreign currency swaps associated with certain senior notes and our subordinated debentures are based on the amounts wethe Company would expect to receive or pay. The determination of the fair value of these derivatives is based on observable market inputs, therefore they are classified as Level 2.


To determine the fair value of its interest rate derivatives, the Company uses inputs that are generally observable in the market or can be derived from observable market data. Interest rate swaps are cleared trades. In a cleared swap contract the clearinghouse provides benefits to the counterparties similar to contracts listed for investment traded on an exchange since it maintains a daily margin to mitigate counterparties credit risk. These derivatives are priced using

146


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


observable inputs, accordingly, they are classified as Level 2. For its interest rate swaptions, the Company estimates their fair values using observable market data, including interest rate curves and volatilities. Their fair values are also classified as Level 2.
For derivatives associated with VIEs where we arethe Company is the primary beneficiary, we arethe Company is not the direct counterparty to the swap contracts. As a result, the fair value measurements incorporate the credit risk of the collateral associated with the VIE. We receiveThe Company receives valuations from a third party pricing vendor for these derivatives. Based on an analysis of these derivatives and a review of the methodology employed by the pricing vendor, wethe Company determined that due to the long duration of these swaps and the need to extrapolate from short-term observable data to derive and measure long-term inputs, certain inputs, assumptions and judgments are required to value future cash flows that cannot be corroborated by current inputs or current observable market data. As a result, the derivatives associated with ourthe Company's consolidated VIEs are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.


Other investments

Other investments where fair value is disclosed above include short-term investments and loan receivables. Loan receivables include transitional real estate loans, commercial mortgage loans, and middle market loans. The Company's loan receivables do not have readily determinable market prices and generally lack market liquidity. Fair values for loan receivables are determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the applicable U.S. Treasury or London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) yield plus an appropriate spread that considers other risk factors, such as credit and liquidity risk. These spreads are provided by the applicable asset managers based on their knowledge of the current loan pricing environment and market conditions. The spreads are a significant component of the pricing inputs and are generally considered unobservable. Therefore, these investments have been assigned a Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

Other policyholders' funds


The largest component of the other policyholders' funds liability is ourthe Company's annuity line of business in Aflac Japan. OurThe Company's annuities have fixed benefits and premiums. For this product, we estimatedthe Company estimates the fair value to be equal to the cash surrender value. This is analogous to the value paid to policyholders on the valuation date if they were to surrender their policy. WeThe Company periodically checkchecks the cash value against discounted cash flow projections for reasonableness. We consider ourThe Company considers its inputs for this valuation to be unobservable and have accordingly classified this valuation as Level 3.


Notes payable


The fair values of ourthe Company's publicly issued notes payable are determined by utilizing available sources of observable inputs from third party pricing vendors and are classified as Level 3 were obtained from a limited number of independent brokers. These brokers base their quotes on a combination of their knowledge of the current pricing environment and market conditions. We consider these inputs to be unobservable.2. The fair values of ourthe Company's yen-denominated loans approximate their carrying values.values and are classified as Level 3.










134



Transfers between Hierarchy Levels and Level 3 RollfowardRollforward


There were no transfers between Level 1 and 2 for assets and liabilities that are measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


The following tables present the changes in fair value of our available-for-salethe Company's investments and derivatives carried at fair value classified as Level 3 as of December 31.

147


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

2015
 Fixed Maturities Perpetual
Securities
 Equity
Securities
 
Derivatives(1)
  
(In millions)Mortgage-
and
Asset-
Backed
Securities
 Public
Utilities
 Sovereign
and
Supranational
 Banks/
Financial
Institutions
 Other
Corporate
 Banks/
Financial
Institutions
   Interest
Rate
Swaps
 Foreign
Currency
Swaps
 Credit
Default
Swaps
 Total
Balance, beginning of period$223
 $0
 $0
 $26
 $0
 $149
 $3
 $0
 $(212) $0
 $189
Realized investment gains (losses) included
in earnings
0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 (15) 1
 (14)
Unrealized gains (losses) included in other
comprehensive income (loss)
(1) 0
 0
 0
 0
 (2) 0
 0
 (1) 0
 (4)
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:              
 
 
 
Purchases0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
Issuances0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
Sales0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 (147) 0
 0
 0
 0
 (147)
Settlements(2) 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 36
 0
 34
Transfers into Level 30
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
Transfers out of Level 30
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
Balance, end of period$220
 $0
 $0
 $26
 $0
 $0
 $3
 $0
 $(192) $1
 $58
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating
to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at
the end of the period included in realized
investment gains (losses)
$0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $(15) $1
 $(14)

2018 
 Fixed Maturity Securities Equity
Securities
 
Derivatives(1)
   
(In millions)Mortgage-
and
Asset-
Backed
Securities
 Public
Utilities
 Banks/
Financial
Institutions
 Other
Corporate
   Foreign
Currency
Swaps
 Credit
Default
Swaps
 Total 
Balance, beginning of period$175
 $68
 $25
 $146
 $16
 $22
 $1
 $453
 
Realized investment gains (losses) included
in earnings
0
 0
 0
 0
 (1) 54
 (1) 52
 
Unrealized gains (losses) included in other
comprehensive income (loss)
2
 1
 (2) 1
 0
 4
 0
 6
 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:          
 
 
 
Purchases0
 40
 0
 56
 31
 0
 0
 127
 
Issuances0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 
Sales0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 
Settlements0
 0
 0
 (6) 0
 0
 0
 (6) 
Transfers into Level 30
 0
 0
 16
 0
 0
 0
 16
 
Transfers out of Level 30
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 
Balance, end of period$177
 $109
 $23
 $213
 $46
 $80
 $0
 $648
 
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating
to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at
the end of the period included in realized
investment gains (losses)
$0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $(1) $54
 $(1) $52
 

(1) Derivative assets and liabilities are presented net





2017 
  Fixed Maturity Securities   Equity
Securities
 
Derivatives(1)
    
(In millions)Mortgage-
and
Asset-
Backed
Securities
 Public
Utilities
 Banks/
Financial
Institutions
 Other
Corporate
   Foreign
Currency
Swaps
 Credit
Default
Swaps
 Total 
Balance, beginning of period$198
 $16
 $25
 $0
 $3
 $(21) $2
 $223
 
Realized investment gains (losses) included in
earnings
0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 43
 (1) 42
 
Unrealized gains (losses) included in other
comprehensive income (loss)
3
 0
 0
 2
 0
 0
 0
 5
 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:

   

   

 

 

 

 
Purchases0
 76
 0
 122
 16
 0
 0
 214
 
Issuances0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 
Sales0
 0
 0
 (2) (1) 0
 0
 (3) 
Settlements(26) 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 (26) 
Transfers into Level 30
 0
 0
 24
(2) 
0
 0
 0
 24
 
Transfers out of Level 30
 (24)
(2) 
0
 0
 (2)
(3) 
0
 0
 (26) 
Balance, end of period$175
 $68
 $25
 $146
 $16
 $22
 $1
 $453
 
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating
to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at
the end of the period included in realized
investment gains (losses)
$0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $43
 $(1) $42
 

135



2014
  Fixed Maturities Perpetual
Securities
 Equity
Securities
 
Derivatives(1)
   
(In millions)Mortgage-
and
Asset-
Backed
Securities
 Public
Utilities
 Sovereign
and
Supranational
 Banks/
Financial
Institutions
 Other
Corporate
 Banks/
Financial
Institutions
   Interest
Rate
Swaps
 Foreign
Currency
Swaps
 Credit
Default
Swaps
 Total
Balance, beginning of period$369
 $0
 $0
 $23
 $0
 $52
 $3
 $1
 $(99) $(3) $346
Realized investment gains (losses) included
in earnings
0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 (1) (191) 3
 (189)
Unrealized gains (losses) included in other
comprehensive income (loss)
(134) 0
 0
 3
 0
 8
 0
 0
 (17) 0
 (140)
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
Issuances0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
Sales0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 (60) 0
 0
 0
 0
 (60)
Settlements(12) 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 95
 0
 83
Transfers into Level 3(2)
0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 149
 0
 0
 0
 0
 149
Transfers out of Level 30
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
Balance, end of period$223
 $0
 $0
 $26
 $0
 $149
 $3
 $0
 $(212) $0
 $189
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating
to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at
the end of the period included in realized
investment gains (losses)
$0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $(1) $(191) $3
 $(189)
(1) Derivative assets and liabilities are presented net
(2) DueTransfer due to use of estimated redemption pricesector classification change

(3) Transfer due to change in accounting method


136148






Fair Value Sensitivity


Level 3 Significant Unobservable Input Sensitivity


The following tables summarize the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of ourthe Company's Level 3 available-for-sale investments and derivatives carried at fair value as of December 31. Included in the tables are the inputs or range of possible inputs that have an effect on the overall valuation of the financial instruments.
2018
(In millions) Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
 
Assets:           
  Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:           
    Fixed maturity securities:           
       Mortgage- and asset-backed securities  $177
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
       Public utilities  109
  Discounted cash flow Credit spreads N/A
(a) 
       Banks/financial institutions  23
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
       Other corporate  213
  Discounted cash flow Credit spreads N/A
(a) 
  Equity securities  46
  Net asset value Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
  Other assets:           
       Foreign currency swaps  125
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.75% - 2.84%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .18% - .71%
(c) 
        CDS spreads 19 - 120 bps 
   57
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.75% - 2.84%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .18% - .71%
(c) 
            Total assets  $750
        
Liabilities:           
  Other liabilities:           
       Foreign currency swaps  $98
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.75% - 2.84%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .18% - .71%
(c) 
        CDS spreads 28 - 211 bps 
   4
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.75% - 2.84%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .18% - .71%
(c) 
            Total liabilities  $102
        
2015
(In millions) Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
 
Assets:           
  Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:           
    Fixed maturities:           
       Mortgage- and asset-backed securities  $220
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(d) 
       Banks/financial institutions  26
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(d) 
    Equity securities  3
  Net asset value Offered quotes $1 - $677 ($7) 
  Other assets:           
       Foreign currency swaps  7
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.20% - 2.62%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .42% - 1.22%
(b) 
        CDS spreads 32 - 147 bps 
        Foreign exchange rates 20.05%
(c) 
   94
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.20% - 2.62%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .42% - 1.22%
(b) 
        Foreign exchange rates 20.05%
(c) 
       Credit default swaps  1
  Discounted cash flow Base correlation 53.26% - 58.40%
(e) 
        CDS spreads 123 bps 
        Recovery rate 36.87% 
            Total assets  $351
        

(a) Inputs derived from U.S. long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of our swaps
(b) Inputs derived from Japan long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of our swaps
(c) Based on 10 year volatility of JPY/USD exchange rate
(d) N/A represents securities where we receivethe Company receives unadjusted broker quotes and for which there is no transparency into the providers' valuation techniques or unobservable inputs.
(e) Range of base correlation for our bespoke tranche for attachment and detachment points corresponding to market indices


137



2015
(In millions) Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
 
Liabilities:           
       Foreign currency swaps  $158
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.20% - 2.62%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .42% - 1.22%
(b) 
        CDS spreads 32 - 147 bps 
        Foreign exchange rates 20.05%
(c) 
   120
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.20% - 2.62%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .42% - 1.22%
(b) 
        CDS spreads 35 - 213 bps 
   15
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.20% - 2.62%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .42% - 1.22%
(b) 
        Foreign exchange rates 20.05%
(c) 
            Total liabilities  $293
        
(a)(b) Inputs derived from U.S. long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of ourthe Company's swaps
(b)(c) Inputs derived from Japan long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of ourthe Company's swaps
(c) Based on 10 year volatility of JPY/USD exchange rate









138149





2014
(In millions) Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
 
Assets:           
  Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:           
    Fixed maturities:           
       Mortgage- and asset-backed securities  $223
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(d) 
       Banks/financial institutions  26
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(d) 
    Perpetual securities:           
       Banks/financial institutions  149
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(d) 
    Equity securities  3
  Net asset value Offered quotes $1-$677 ($6) 
  Other assets:           
       Foreign currency swaps  8
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.28% - 2.70%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .53% - 1.34%
(b) 
        CDS spreads 16 - 105 bps 
        Foreign exchange rates 20.50%
(c) 
   98
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.28% - 2.70%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .53% - 1.34%
(b) 
        Foreign exchange rates 20.50%
(c) 
            Total assets  $507
        

2017
(In millions) Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
 
Assets:           
  Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:           
    Fixed maturity securities:           
       Mortgage- and asset-backed securities  $175
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
       Public utilities  68
  Discounted cash flow Credit spreads N/A
(a) 
       Banks/financial institutions  25
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
       Other corporate  146
  Discounted cash flow Credit spreads N/A
(a) 
  Equity securities  16
  Net asset value Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
  Other assets:           
       Foreign currency swaps  80
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.40% - 2.54%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .26% - .85%
(c) 
        CDS spreads 9 - 90 bps 
   70
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.40% - 2.54%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .26% - .85%
(c) 
       Credit default swaps  1
  Discounted cash flow Base correlation     46.33% - 49.65%
(d) 
        CDS spreads 25 bps 
        Recovery rate 37.24% 
            Total assets  $581
        
Liabilities:           
  Other liabilities:           
       Foreign currency swaps  $120
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.40% - 2.54%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .26% - .85%
(c) 
        CDS spreads 13 - 157 bps 
   8
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.40% - 2.54%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .26% - .85%
(c) 
            Total liabilities  $128
        

(a) Inputs derived from U.S. long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of our swaps
(b) Inputs derived from Japan long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of our swaps
(c) Based on 10 year volatility of JPY/USD exchange rate
(d) N/A represents securities where we receivethe Company receives unadjusted broker quotes and for which there is no transparency into the providers' valuation techniques or unobservable inputs.


139



2014
(In millions) Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
 
Liabilities:           
       Foreign currency swaps  $176
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.28% - 2.70%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .53% - 1.34%
(b) 
        CDS spreads 16 - 105 bps 
        Foreign exchange rates 20.50%
(c) 
   111
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.28% - 2.70%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .53% - 1.34%
(b) 
        CDS spreads 13 - 145 bps 
   31
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.28% - 2.70%
(a) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .53% - 1.34%
(b) 
        Foreign exchange rates 20.50%
(c) 
            Total liabilities  $318
        
(a)(b) Inputs derived from U.S. long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of ourthe Company's swaps
(b)(c) Inputs derived from Japan long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of ourthe Company's swaps
(c) Based on 10 year volatility(d) Range of JPY/USD exchange ratebase correlation for the Company's bespoke tranche for attachment and detachment points corresponding to market indices




140150






The following is a discussion of the significant unobservable inputs or valuation techniquetechniques used in determining the fair value of securities and derivatives classified as Level 3.


Net Asset Value


We holdThe Company holds certain unlisted equity securities whose fair value is derived based on the financial statements published by the investee. These securities do not trade on an active market and the valuations derived are dependent on the availability of timely financial reporting of the investee. Net asset value is an unobservable input in the determination of fair value ofequity securities.


Offered Quotes


In circumstances where ourthe Company's valuation model price is overridden because it implies a value that is not consistent with current market conditions, wethe Company will solicit bids from a limited number of brokers. WeThe Company also receivereceives unadjusted prices from brokers for ourits mortgage and asset-backed securities. These quotes are non-binding but are reflective of valuation best estimates at that particular point in time. Offered quotes are an unobservable input in the determination of fair value of mortgage- and asset-backed securities, certain banks/financial institutions, certain other corporate, and equity securities investments.


Interest Rates and CDS Spreads Foreign Exchange Rates


The significant drivers of the valuation of the interest and foreign exchange swaps are interest rates foreign exchange rates and CDS spreads. OurSome of the Company's swaps have long maturities that increase the sensitivity of the swaps to interest rate fluctuations. Since most of our yen-denominatedFor the Company's foreign exchange or cross currency swaps that are in a net liabilityasset position, an increase in yen interest rates (all other factors held constant) will decrease the liabilities and increasepresent value of the yen final settlement receivable (receive leg), thus decreasing the value of the swap.swap as long as the derivative remains in a net asset position.
Foreign exchange swaps also have a lump-sum final settlement of foreign exchange principal receivablesamounts at the termination of the swap. AnAssuming all other factors are held constant, an increase in yen interest rates will decrease the receive leg and decrease the net value of the final settlement foreign exchange receivables and decrease the value of the swap, andswap. Likewise, holding all other factors constant, an increase in U.S. dollar interest rates will increase the swap value.
A similar sensitivity pattern is observed for the foreign exchange rates. When the spot U.S. dollar/Japanese yen (USD/JPY) foreign exchange rate decreases and the swap is receiving a final exchange payment in JPY, the swapswap's net value will increase due to the appreciation of the JPY. Most of our swaps are designed to receive payments in JPY at the termination and will thus be impacted by the USD/JPY foreign exchange rate in this way. In cases where there is no final foreign exchange receivable in JPY and we are paying JPY as interest payments and receiving USD, a decrease in the foreign exchange rate will lead to a decrease inpresent value of the swap value.

dollar final settlement payable (pay leg).
The extinguisher feature in most of ourthe Company's VIE swaps results in a cessation of cash flows and no further payments between the parties to the swap in the event of a default on the referenced or underlying collateral. To price this feature, we applythe Company applies the survival probability of the referenced entity to the projected cash flows. The survival probability uses the CDS spreads and recovery rates to adjust the present value of the cash flows. For extinguisher swaps with positive values, an increase in CDS spreads decreases the likelihood of receiving the final exchange payments and reduces the value of the swap.

Due to the long duration of these swaps and the need to extrapolate from short-term observable data to derive and measure long-term inputs, certain inputs, assumptions and judgments are required to value future cash flows that cannot be corroborated by current inputs or current observable market data.

Interest rates, CDS spreads, and foreign exchange rates are unobservable inputs in the determination of fair value of foreign currency swaps.

Base Correlations, CDS Spreads, Recovery Rates

Our remaining CDO is a tranche on a basket of single-name credit default swaps. The risk in this synthetic CDO comes from the single-name CDS risk and the correlations between the single names. The valuation of synthetic CDOs is dependent on the calibration of market prices for interest rates, single name CDS default probabilities and base correlation using financial modeling tools. Since there is limited or no observable data available for this tranche, the base correlations must be obtained from commonly traded market tranches such as the CDX and iTraxx indices. From the historical prices of these indices, base correlations can be obtained to develop a pricing curve of CDOs with different seniorities. Since the reference entities of the market indices do not match those in the portfolio underlying the synthetic CDO to be valued, several processing steps are taken to map the CDO in our portfolio to the indices. With the base

141



correlation determined and the appropriate spreads selected, a valuation is calculated. An increase in the CDS spreads in the underlying portfolio leads to a decrease in the value due to higher probability of defaults and losses. The impact on the valuation due to base correlation depends on a number of factors, including the riskiness between market tranches and the modeled tranche based on our portfolio and the equivalence between detachment points in these tranches. Generally speaking, an increase in base correlation will decrease the value of the senior tranches while increasing the value of junior tranches. This may result in a positive or negative value change.

The CDO tranche in our portfolio is a senior mezzanine tranche and, due to the low level of credit support for this type of tranche, exhibits equity-like behavior. As a result, an increase in recovery rates tends to cause its value to decrease.

Base correlations, CDS spreads, and recovery rates are unobservable inputs in the determination of fair value of credit default swaps.


For additional information on ourthe Company's investments and financial instruments, see the accompanying Notes 1, 3 and 4.



6. DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS AND INSURANCE EXPENSES
Consolidated policy acquisition costs deferred were $1.3$1.5 billion in 2015 and 2014,2018, compared with $1.4$1.5 billion in 20132017 and $1.4 billion in 2016. The following table presents a rollforward of deferred policy acquisition costs by segment for the years ended December 31.
  2018 2017
(In millions)Japan U.S. Japan U.S.
Deferred policy acquisition costs:               
Balance, beginning of year $6,150
   $3,355
   $5,765
   $3,228
 
Capitalization 833
   669
   839
   629
 
Amortization (710)   (534)   (630)   (502) 
Foreign currency translation and other 111
   1
   176
   0
 
Balance, end of year $6,384
   $3,491
   $6,150
   $3,355
 


151


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  2015 2014
(In millions)Japan U.S. Japan U.S.
Deferred policy acquisition costs:               
Balance, beginning of year $5,211
   $3,062
   $5,819
   $2,979
 
Capitalization 738
   578
   790
   548
 
Amortization (578)   (488)   (649)   (459) 
Foreign currency translation and other (1)   (11)   (749)   (6) 
Balance, end of year $5,370
   $3,141
   $5,211
   $3,062
 

Commissions deferred as a percentage of total acquisition costs deferred were 74%72% in 2015,2018, compared with 77%72% in 20142017 and 81%74% in 2013.2016.


Personnel, compensation and benefit expenses as a percentage of insurance expenses were 52%54% in 2015 and 2014,2018, compared with 51%56% in 2013.2017 and 53% in 2016. Advertising expense, which is included in insurance expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, was as follows for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Advertising expense:           
Aflac Japan $108
   $100
   $100
 
Aflac U.S. 110
   110
   124
 
          Total advertising expense $218
   $210
   $224
 

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Advertising expense:           
Aflac Japan $82
   $103
   $112
 
Aflac U.S. 129
   126
   128
 
          Total advertising expense $211
   $229
   $240
 


Depreciation and other amortization expenses, which are included in insurance expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, were as follows for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Depreciation expense $48
   $50
   $48
 
Other amortization expense 1
   3
   6
 
          Total depreciation and other amortization expense $49
   $53
   $54
 

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Depreciation expense $44
   $47
   $56
 
Other amortization expense 6
   8
   13
 
          Total depreciation and other amortization expense $50
   $55
   $69
 



142



Lease and rental expense, which are included in insurance expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, were as follows for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Lease and rental expense:           
Aflac Japan $53
   $52
   $53
 
Aflac U.S. 16
   21
   21
 
Other 4
   2
   1
 
          Total lease and rental expense $73
   $75
   $75
 

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Lease and rental expense:           
Aflac Japan $46
   $52
   $55
 
Aflac U.S. 18
   15
   10
 
Other 1
   1
   1
 
          Total lease and rental expense $65
   $68
   $66
 



7. POLICY LIABILITIES
Policy liabilities consist of future policy benefits, unpaid policy claims, unearned premiums, and other policyholders' funds, which accounted for 80%84%, 4%, 9%5% and 7% of total policy liabilities at December 31, 2015,2018, respectively. WeThe Company regularly reviewreviews the adequacy of ourits policy liabilities in total and by component.
The liability for future policy benefits as of December 31 consisted of the following:


143152




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     Liability Amounts  Interest Rates
(In millions)Policy
Issue Year
 2015 2014  Year of
Issue
 In 20
Years
Health insurance:            
Japan:1992 - 2015 $7,633
 $3,900
  1.25 - 2.5% 1.25 - 2.5%
 1974 - 2013 1,078
 3,449
  2.7 - 2.75  2.25 - 2.75 
 1998 - 2014 11,008
 10,641
  3.0  3.0 
 1997 - 1999 2,435
 2,461
  3.5  3.5 
 1994 - 1996 2,998
 3,023
  4.0 - 4.5  4.0 - 4.5 
 1987 - 1994 14,161
 14,394
  5.5  5.5 
 1985 - 1991 1,868
 1,923
  5.25 - 6.75  5.25 - 5.5 
 1978 - 1984 2,163
 2,260
  6.5  5.5 
             
U.S.:2013 - 2015 57
 42
  3.0 - 3.5  3.0 - 3.5 
 2012 - 2015 794
 546
  3.75  3.75 
 2011 300
 276
  4.75  4.75 
 2005 - 2010 2,986
 2,951
  5.5  5.5 
 1988 - 2004 687
 706
  8.0  6.0 
 1986 - 2004 1,276
 1,293
  6.0  6.0 
 1981 - 1986 174
 183
  6.5 - 7.0  5.5 - 6.5 
 1998 - 2004 1,279
 1,260
  7.0  7.0 
 Other 21
 21
       
             
Intercompany eliminations:2015 (646)
(1) 
0
  2.0  2.0 
             
             
Life insurance:            
Japan:2001 - 2015 5,441
 3,986
  1.5 - 1.85  1.5 - 1.85 
 2011 - 2015 3,226
 2,298
  2.0  2.0 
 2009 - 2011 2,332
 1,890
  2.25  2.25 
 1992 - 2006 5
 0
  2.35  1.77 
 2005 - 2011 1,330
 1,214
  2.5  2.5 
 1985 - 2006 1,962
 2,006
  2.7  2.25 
 2007 - 2011 1,105
 1,010
  2.75  2.75 
 1999 - 2011 1,988
 1,944
  3.0  3.0 
 1996 - 2009 635
 633
  3.5  3.5 
 1994 - 1996 877
 884
  4.0 - 4.5  4.0 - 4.5 
             
U.S.:1956 - 2015 514
 452
  3.5 - 6.0  3.5 - 6.0 
Total  $69,687
 $65,646
       

     Liability Amounts  Interest Rates
(In millions)Policy
Issue Year
 2018 2017  Year of
Issue
 In 20
Years
Health insurance:            
Japan:1992 - 2018 $11,598
 $10,167
  1.0 - 2.5% 1.0 - 2.5%
 1974 - 2013 1,161
 1,133
  2.7 - 2.75  2.25 - 2.75 
 1998 - 2018 12,764
 12,386
  3.0  3.0 
 1997 - 1999 2,452
 2,454
  3.5  3.5 
 1994 - 1996 3,056
 3,046
  4.0 - 4.5  4.0 - 4.5 
 1987 - 1994 14,722
 14,829
  5.5  5.5 
 1985 - 1991 1,779
 1,816
  5.25 - 6.75  5.25 - 5.5 
 1978 - 1984 1,964
 2,037
  6.5  5.5 
             
U.S.:2013 - 2018 96
 82
  3.0 - 3.5  3.0 - 3.5 
 2012 - 2018 1,682
 1,366
  3.75  3.75 
 2011 353
 343
  4.75  4.75 
 2005 - 2010 2,946
 2,944
  5.5  5.5 
 1988 - 2004 641
 656
  8.0  6.0 
 1986 - 2004 1,245
 1,296
  6.0  6.0 
 1981 - 1986 151
 159
  6.5 - 7.0  5.5 - 6.5 
 1998 - 2004 1,311
 1,310
  7.0  7.0 
 Other 17
 18
       
             
Intercompany eliminations:2015 (583)
(1) 
(609)
(1) 
 2.0  2.0 
             
             
Life insurance:            
Japan:2001 - 2018 10,296
 8,850
  1.0 - 1.85  1.0 - 1.85 
 2011 - 2017 5,116
 4,763
  2.0  2.0 
 2009 - 2011 3,867
 3,393
  2.25  2.25 
 1992 - 2006 5
 5
  2.19  1.55 
 2005 - 2011 1,769
 1,642
  2.5  2.5 
 1985 - 2006 2,057
 2,048
  2.7  2.25 
 2007 - 2011 1,380
 1,319
  2.75  2.75 
 1999 - 2011 2,249
 2,189
  3.0  3.0 
 1996 - 2009 678
 675
  3.5  3.5 
 1994 - 1996 901
 908
  4.0 - 4.5  4.0 - 4.5 
             
U.S.:1956 - 2018 695
 632
  3.5 - 6.0  3.5 - 6.0 
Total  $86,368
 $81,857
       
(1)Elimination entry necessary due to recapture of a portion of policy liabilities ceded externally, as a result of the reinsurance retrocession transaction as described in Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The weighted-average interest rates reflected in the consolidated statements of earnings for future policy benefits for Japanese policies were 3.6%3.3% in 20152018, compared with 3.8%3.4% in 20142017 and 3.9%3.5% in 20132016; and for U.S. policies, 5.6%5.3% in 20152018, compared with 5.7%5.4% in 20142017 and 5.8%5.5% in 20132016.




144153




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Changes in the liability for unpaid policy claims were as follows for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Unpaid supplemental health claims, beginning of year $3,412
 $3,537
 $3,781
 
Unpaid supplemental health claims, beginning of period $3,884
 $3,707
 $3,548
 
Less reinsurance recoverables 7
 9
 10
  30
 27
 26
 
Net balance, beginning of year 3,405
 3,528
 3,771
 
Add claims incurred during the year related to:       
Net balance, beginning of period 3,854
 3,680
 3,522
 
Add claims incurred during the period related to:       
Current year 6,416
 6,866
 7,215
  7,101
 6,979
 7,037
 
Prior years (353) (301) (236)  (563) (518) (465) 
Total incurred 6,063
 6,565
 6,979
  6,538
 6,461
 6,572
 
Less claims paid during the year on claims incurred during:       
Less claims paid during the period on claims incurred during:       
Current year 4,227
 4,532
 4,834
  4,612
 4,530
 4,613
 
Prior years 1,718
 1,873
 1,931
  1,898
 1,822
 1,865
 
Total paid 5,945
 6,405
 6,765
  6,510
 6,352
 6,478
 
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on unpaid claims (1) (283) (457)  43
 65
 64
 
Net balance, end of year 3,522
 3,405
 3,528
 
Net balance, end of period 3,925
 3,854
 3,680
 
Add reinsurance recoverables 26
 7
 9
  27
 30
 27
 
Unpaid supplemental health claims, end of year 3,548
 3,412
 3,537
 
Unpaid life claims, end of year 254
 218
 226
 
Unpaid supplemental health claims, end of period 3,952
 3,884
 3,707
 
Unpaid life claims, end of period 632
 508
 338
 
Total liability for unpaid policy claims $3,802
 $3,630
 $3,763
  $4,584
 $4,392
 $4,045
 


The incurred claims development related to prior years reflects favorable claims experience compared to previous estimates, primarilyestimates. The favorable claims development of $563 million for 2018 comprises approximately $419 million from Japan, which represents approximately 74% of the total. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange of a gain of approximately $14 million from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018, the favorable claims development in our linesJapan would have been approximately $404 million, representing approximately 72% of businessthe total.

The Company has experienced continued favorable claim trends in 2018 for its core health products in Japan. The Company's experience in Japan related to the average length of stay in the hospital for cancer treatment has shown continued decline in the current period. In addition, cancer treatment patterns in Japan are continuing to be influenced by significant advances in early-detection techniques and by the increased use of pathological diagnosis rather than clinical exams. Additionally, follow-up radiation and chemotherapy treatments are occurring more often on an outpatient basis. Such changes in treatment not only increase the quality of life and initial outcomes for the patients, but also decrease the average length of each hospital stay, resulting in favorable claims development.


As of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, unearned premiums consisted primarily of discounted advance premiums on deposit. Discounted advance premiums are premiums on deposit from policyholders in conjunction with their purchase of certain Aflac Japan limited-pay insurance products. These advanced premiums are deferred upon collection and recognized as premium revenue over the contractual premium payment period. These advanced premiums represented 77%69% of the December 31, 20152018 and 80%73% of the December 31, 20142017 unearned premiums balances.


As of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, the largest component of the other policyholders' funds liability is ourwas the Company's annuity line of business in Aflac Japan. OurThe Company's annuities have fixed benefits and premiums. These annuities represented 98%97% of the December 31, 2015 and 2014 other policyholders' funds liability.liability at December 31, 2018, compared with 98% at December 31, 2017 .






145154




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


8. REINSURANCE


We enterThe Company periodically enters into fixed quota-share coinsurance agreements with other companies in the normal course of business. For each of ourits reinsurance agreements, we determinethe Company determines whether the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Reinsurance premiums and benefits paid or provided are accounted for on bases consistent with those used in accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts. Premiums and benefits are reported net of insurance ceded.


Effective March 31, 2015, we entered into a coinsurance transaction whereby we ceded 30.0% of the sickness hospital benefit of one of Aflac Japan’s closed in-force blocks of business. In December 2015, we entered into an agreement for an $80 million letter of credit as collateral for this reinsurance transaction (see Note 13 for additional information). Effective April 1, 2015, we entered into a retrocession coinsurance transaction whereby we assumed 27.0% of the sickness hospital benefit of one of Aflac Japan’s closed in-force blocks of business through our subsidiary CAIC.

Effective October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2013, we entered into coinsurance reinsurance transactions whereby we ceded 16.7% and 33.3%, respectively, of the hospital benefit of one of Aflac Japan’s closed medical in-force blocks of business. Effective December 31, 2014, we entered into a retrocession coinsurance reinsurance transaction whereby we assumed 8.35% of the reinsured hospital benefit of one of Aflac Japan’s closed medical in-force blocks of business through our subsidiary CAIC.

For our reinsurance transactions to date, we haveThe Company has recorded a deferred profit liability related to the reinsurance transactions. The remaining deferred profit liability of $786 million,$1.0 billion, as of December 31, 2015,2018, is included in future policy benefits in the consolidated balance sheet and is being amortized into income over the expected lives of the policies. WeThe Company has also have recorded a reinsurance recoverable for reinsurance transactions, which is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet and had a remaining balance of $805$941 million and $908 million as of December 31, 2015.2018 and 2017, respectively. The increase in the reinsurance recoverable balance was driven by two aggregating factors: yen strengthening and the growth in reserves related to the business that has been reinsured as the policies age. The spot yen/dollar exchange rate strengthened by approximately 2% and ceded reserves increased approximately 2% from December 31, 2017, to December 31, 2018.


The following table reconciles direct premium income and direct benefits and claims to net amounts after the effect of reinsurance for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)201820172016
Direct premium income $19,018
  $18,875
  $19,592
 
Ceded to other companies:         
    Ceded Aflac Japan closed blocks (497)  (515)  (560) 
    Other (58)  (51)  (48) 
Assumed from other companies:         
    Retrocession activities 208
  216
  234
 
    Other 6
  6
  7
 
Net premium income $18,677
  $18,531
  $19,225
 
          
Direct benefits and claims $12,293
  $12,486
  $13,240
 
Ceded benefits and change in reserves for future benefits:         
    Ceded Aflac Japan closed blocks (450)  (473)  (509) 
    Eliminations 43
  51
  58
 
    Other (44)  (44)  (38) 
Assumed from other companies:         
    Retrocession activities 209
  209
  222
 
    Eliminations (53)  (51)  (58) 
    Other 2
  3
  4
 
Benefits and claims, net $12,000
  $12,181
  $12,919
 

(In millions)20152014
Direct premium income $17,904
  $19,412
 
Ceded to other companies:      
    Ceded Aflac Japan closed blocks (481)  (311) 
    Other (39)  (39) 
Assumed from other companies:      
    Retrocession activities 178
  0
 
    Other 8
  10
 
Net premium income $17,570
  $19,072
 
       
Direct benefits and claims $12,041
  $13,235
 
Ceded benefits and change in reserves for future benefits:      
    Ceded Aflac Japan closed blocks (437)  (276) 
    Other 16
  (27) 
Assumed from other companies:      
    Retrocession activities 167
  0
 
    Other (41)  5
 
Benefits and claims, net $11,746
  $12,937
 


These reinsurance transactions are indemnity reinsurance that do not relieve usthe Company from ourits obligations to policyholders. In the event that the reinsurer is unable to meet their obligations, we remainthe Company remains liable for the reinsured claims.


As a part of ourits capital contingency plan, wethe Company entered into a committed reinsurance facility agreement on December 1, 2015 in the amount of approximately 110 billion yen.yen of reserves. This reinsurance facility agreement was renewed in 2018 and is effective from December 1, 2015 until December 31, 2016.2019. There are also additional commitment periods of a one-year duration each of which are automatically extended unless notification is received from the reinsurer within 60 days prior to the expiration. The

146



reinsurer can withdraw from the committed facility if Aflac‘s Standard and Poor's (S&P) rating drops below BBB-. As of December 31, 2015, we have2018, the Company had not executed a reinsurance treaty under this committed reinsurance facility.


155


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


9. NOTES PAYABLE
A summary of notes payable as of December 31 follows:
(In millions)2018 2017
2.40% senior notes paid November 2018 $0
   $548
 
4.00% senior notes due February 2022 348
   348
 
3.625% senior notes due June 2023 698
   697
 
3.625% senior notes due November 2024 746
   745
 
3.25% senior notes due March 2025 447
   446
 
2.875% senior notes due October 2026 297
   297
 
6.90% senior notes due December 2039 220
   220
 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040 254
   254
 
4.00% senior notes due October 2046 394
   394
 
4.750% senior notes due January 2049 540
   0
 
Yen-denominated senior notes and subordinated debentures:       
.932% senior notes due January 2027 (principal amount 60.0 billion yen) 538
   528
 
1.159% senior notes due October 2030 (principal amount 29.3 billion yen) 262
   0
 
1.488% senior notes due October 2033 (principal amount 15.2 billion yen) 136
   0
 
1.750% senior notes due October 2038 (principal amount 8.9 billion yen) 79
   0
 
2.108% subordinated debentures due October 2047 (principal amount 60.0 billion yen) 536
   526
 
Yen-denominated loans:       
Variable interest rate loan due September 2021 (.32% in 2018 and 2017, principal amount 5.0 billion yen) 45
   44
 
Variable interest rate loan due September 2023 (.47% in 2018 and 2017, principal amount 25.0 billion yen) 225
   220
 
Capitalized lease obligations payable through 2025 13
   22
 
Total notes payable $5,778
   $5,289
 

(In millions)2015 2014
3.45% senior notes paid August 2015 $0
   $300
 
2.65% senior notes due February 2017 652
(1) 
  653
(1) 
8.50% senior notes due May 2019 0
(2) 
  850

2.40% senior notes due March 2020 550
   0
 
4.00% senior notes due February 2022 350

  350

3.625% senior notes due June 2023 700
   700
 
3.625% senior notes due November 2024 749
(3) 
  749
(3) 
3.25% senior notes due March 2025 448
(3) 
  0
 
6.90% senior notes due December 2039 397
(3) 
  397
(3) 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040 448
(3) 
  448
(3) 
5.50% subordinated debentures due September 2052 500
   500
 
Yen-denominated Uridashi notes:       
2.26% notes due September 2016 (principal amount 8 billion yen) 66
   66
 
Yen-denominated Samurai notes:       
1.84% notes due July 2016 (principal amount 15.8 billion yen) 131
   131
 
Yen-denominated loans:       
3.60% loan paid July 2015 (principal amount 10 billion yen) 0
   83
 
3.00% loan paid August 2015 (principal amount 5 billion yen) 0
   41
 
Capitalized lease obligations payable through 2022 20
   14
 
Total notes payable $5,011
   $5,282
 
(1) Principal amount plus anAmounts in the table above are reported net of debt issuance premiumcosts and issuance premiums or discounts, if applicable, that isare being amortized over the life of the notesnotes.
(2) Redeemed
In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in April 2015
(3) Principalwhole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount net of an issuance discount that is being amortized over the life of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.


In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 15-year maturity. The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In October 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of subordinated debentures through a U.S. public debt offering. The debentures bear interest at an initial rate of 2.108% per annum through October 22, 2027, or earlier redemption. Thereafter, the rate of the interest of the debentures will be reset every five years at a rate of interest equal to the then-current JPY 5-year Swap Offered Rate plus 205 basis points. The debentures are payable semi-annually in arrears and have a 30-year maturity. The debentures are redeemable (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax events or certain rating agency events, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the

156


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


debentures or (ii) on or after October 23, 2027, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

In January 2017, the Parent Company issued 60.0 billion yen of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of .932% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 10-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In September 2016, the Parent Company issued two series of senior notes totaling $700 million through a U.S. public debt offering. The first series, which totaled $300 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.875% per annum, payable semi-annually and has a 10-year maturity. The second series, which totaled $400 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 30-year maturity.

In September 2016, the Parent Company entered into two series of senior unsecured term loan facilities totaling 30.0 billion yen. The first series, which totaled 5.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to the Tokyo interbank market rate (TIBOR), or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and has a five-year maturity. The applicable margin ranges between .20% and .60%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second series, which totaled 25.0 billion yen, bears an interest rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and has a seven-year maturity. The applicable margin ranges between .35% and .75%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In March 2015, the Parent Company issued two series of senior notes totaling $1.0 billion through a U.S. public debt offering. The first series, which totaled $550 million, bearsbore interest at a fixed rate of 2.40% per annum, payable semi-annually, and hashad a five-year maturity. The second series, which totaled $450 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.25% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a ten-year10-year maturity. We haveThe Parent Company has entered into cross-currency swaps that convert the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the senior notes into yen-denominated obligations which results in lower nominal net interest rates on the debt. By entering into these cross-currency swaps, wethe Parent Company economically converted ourits $550 million liability into a 67.0 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 2.40% in dollars to .24% in yen, and wethe Parent Company economically converted ourits $450 million liability into a 55.0 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 3.25% in dollars to .82% in yen. In April 2015,November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the March 2015October 2018 issuance of its fixed-rate senior notes to redeem $850$550 million of our 8.50% fixed-ratethe Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due May 2019 and to pay a portion of the corresponding $230 million make-whole premium due to the investors of these notes.2020.


In November 2014, the Parent Company issued $750 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.625% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a ten-year10-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at ourthe Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the treasury rate plus 20 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. We The Parent Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to reduce interest expense by converting the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the

147



senior notes weit issued into yen-denominated obligations. By entering into the swaps, wethe Parent Company economically converted ourits $750 million liability into an 85.3 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 3.625% in dollars to 1.00% in yen.


In June 2013, the Parent Company issued $700 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.625% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a ten-year10-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at ourthe Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the treasury rate plus 20 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. We The Parent Company had entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to reduce interest expense by converting the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the senior notes weit issued into yen-denominated obligations. By entering into these swaps, wethe Parent Company economically converted ourits $700 million liability into a 69.8 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 3.625% in dollars to 1.50% in yen.



157


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


In SeptemberFebruary 2012, the Parent Company issued $450$350 million of subordinated debenturessenior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The debenturesnotes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.50% per annum, payable quarterly, and have a 40-year maturity. In five years, on or after September 26, 2017, we may redeem the debentures, in whole or in part, at their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption; provided that if the debentures are not redeemed in whole, at least $25 million aggregate principal amount of the debentures must remain outstanding after giving effect to such redemption. The debentures may only be redeemed prior to September 26, 2017, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax events or certain rating agency events, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the debentures. We entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the subordinated debentures we issued into yen-denominated obligations. By entering into these swaps, we economically converted our $450 million liability into a 35.3 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 5.50% in dollars to 4.41% in yen. The swaps will expire after the initial five-year non-callable period for the debentures. In October 2012, the underwriters exercised their option, pursuant to the underwriting agreement, to purchase an additional $50 million principal amount of the debentures discussed above. We entered into a cross-currency interest rate swap to economically convert this $50 million liability into a 3.9 billion yen liability and reduce the interest rate from 5.50% in dollars to 4.42% in yen. The swap will expire after the initial five-year non-callable period for the debentures.

In February 2012, the Parent Company issued two series of senior notes totaling $750 million through a U.S. public debt offering. The first series, which totaled $400 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.65%4.00% per annum, payable semiannually, and hashave a five-year maturity. The second series, which totaled $350 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum, payable semiannually, and has a ten-year10-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at ourthe Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the principal amount of the notes or (ii) the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest to be redeemed, discounted to the redemption date, plus accrued and unpaid interest. WeThe Parent Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to reduce interest expense by converting the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the senior notes weit issued into yen-denominated obligations. By entering into these swaps, wethe Parent Company economically converted our $400its $350 million liability into a 30.927.0 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 2.65%4.00% in dollars to 1.22%2.07% in yen. We also economically converted our $350 million liability into a 27.0 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 4.00% in dollars to 2.07% in yen. In July 2012, the Parent Company issued $250 million of senior notes that are an addition to the original first series of senior notes issued in February 2012. These notes have a five-year maturity and a fixed rate of 2.65% per annum, payable semiannually.


In July 2011, the Parent Company issued three series of Samurai notes totaling 50.0 billion yen through a public debt offering. The first series, which totaled 28.7 billion yen, and the third series, which totaled 5.5 billion yen, were redeemed in July 2014. The second series, which totaled 15.8 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.84% per annum, payable semiannually, and has a five-year maturity. These Samurai notes are not available to U.S. persons.

In 2010 and 2009, wethe Parent Company issued senior notes through U.S. public debt offerings; the details of these notes are as follows. In August 2010, wethe Parent Company issued $450$450 million and $300 million of senior notes that have 30-year and five-year maturities, respectively. In August 2015, we paid off the $300 million senior notes upon their maturity. In December 2009, we issued $400 million of senior notes that have a 30-year30-year maturity. In MayDecember 2009, wethe Parent Company issued $850$400 million of senior notes that hadhave a ten-year maturity, and subsequently redeemed these notes in April 2015 using proceeds from the March 2015 issuance of fixed-rate senior notes.30-year maturity. These senior notes pay interest semiannually and are redeemable at ourthe Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the principal amount of the notes or (ii)

148



the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest to be redeemed, discounted to the redemption date, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
In September 2006,December 2016, the Parent Company issuedcompleted a tranchetender offer in which it extinguished $176 million principal of Uridashiits 6.90% senior notes totaling 10 billion yen with a ten-year maturity. These Uridashidue 2039 and $193 million principal of its 6.45% senior notes pay interest semiannually, may only be redeemed priordue 2040. The pretax loss due to maturity upon the occurrence of a tax event as specified in the respective bond agreement and are not available to U.S. persons. During 2009, we extinguished 2.0 billion yen (par value)early redemption of these Uridashi notes by buying the notes on the open market at a cost of 1.4 billion yen, yielding a gain of .6 billion yen.was $137 million.

In August 2015, we paid off a 5.0 billion yen loan at its maturity date (a total of approximately $41 million using the exchange rate at the maturity date). In July 2015, we paid off a 10.0 billion yen loan at its maturity date (a total of approximately $81 million using the exchange rate at the maturity date).


For ourthe Company's yen-denominated notes and loans, the principal amount as stated in dollar terms will fluctuate from period to period due to changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate. We haveThe Company has designated the majority of ourits yen-denominated notes payable as a nonderivative hedge of the foreign currency exposure of ourthe Company's investment in Aflac Japan.


The aggregate contractual maturities of notes payable during each of the years after December 31, 20152018, are as follows:
(In millions)Long-term
Debt
 Capitalized
Lease
Obligations
 Total
Notes
Payable
2019 $0
   $5
   $5
 
2020 0
   3
   3
 
2021 45
   2
   47
 
2022 350
   1
   351
 
2023 925
   1
   926
 
Thereafter 4,493
   1
   4,494
 
Total $5,813
   $13
   $5,826
 







158


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions)Long-term
Debt
 Capitalized
Lease
Obligations
 Total
Notes
Payable
2016 $197
   $6
   $203
 
2017 650
   5
   655
 
2018 0
   4
   4
 
2019 0
   3
   3
 
2020 550
   1
   551
 
Thereafter 3,600
   1
   3,601
 
Total $4,997
   $20
   $5,017
 

In October 2015,A summary of the Parent Company and Aflac jointly entered into a 364 days uncommitted bilateral lineCompany's lines of credit that provides for borrowings in the amount of $100 million. Borrowings will bear interest at the rate quoted by the bank and agreed upon at the time of making such loan and will have a three-month maturity period. There are no related facility fees, upfront expenses or financial covenant requirements. Borrowings under this credit agreement may be used for general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the financing agreement will mature no later than three months after the last drawdown date of October 15, 2016. Asas of December 31, 2015, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under our $1002018 follows:
BorrowerTypeOriginal TermExpiration DateCapacityAmount OutstandingInterest Rate on Borrowed AmountMaturity PeriodCommitment FeeBusiness Purpose
Aflac Incorporated
and Aflac
uncommitted bilateral364 daysDecember 27, 2019$100 million$0 millionThe rate quoted by the bank and agreed upon at the time of borrowingUp to 3 monthsNoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac Incorporatedunsecured revolving3 yearsMarch 31, 2019, or the date commitments are terminated pursuant to an event of default100.0 billion yen0.0 billion yenA rate per annum equal to (a) Tokyo interbank market rate (TIBOR) plus, the alternative applicable TIBOR margin during the availability period from the closing date to the commitment termination date or (b) the TIBOR rate offered by the agent to major banks in yen for the applicable period plus, the applicable alternative TIBOR margin during the term out periodNo later than
March 31, 2019
.30% to .50%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determinationGeneral corporate purposes, including a capital contingency plan for the operations of the Parent Company
Aflac Incorporated
and Aflac
unsecured revolving5 yearsApril 4, 2023, or the date commitments are terminated pursuant to an event of default55.0 billion yen, or the equivalent amount in U.S. dollars0.0 billion yenA rate per annum equal to, at the Company's option, either, (a) London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) adjusted for certain costs or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (1) the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%, (2) the rate of interest for such day announced by Mizuho Bank, Ltd. as its prime rate, or (3) the eurocurrency rate for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%, in each case plus an applicable marginNo later than April 4, 2023.085% to
.225%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination
General corporate purposes, including a capital contingency plan for the operations of the Parent Company
Aflac Incorporated
and Aflac
uncommitted bilateralNone specifiedNone specified$50 million$0 millionA rate per annum equal to, at the Parent Company's option, either (a) a eurocurrency rate determined by reference to the agent's LIBOR for the interest period relevant to such borrowing or (b) the base rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the prime rate as determined by the agent, and (ii) the sum of 0.50% and the federal funds rate for such dayUp to 3 monthsNoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac(1)
uncommitted revolving364 daysNovember 29, 2019$250 million$0 millionUSD three-month LIBOR plus 75 basis points per annum3 monthsNoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac Incorporated(1)
uncommitted revolving364 daysApril 2, 201950.0 billion yen0.0 billion yenThree-month TIBOR plus 80 basis points per annum3 monthsNoneGeneral corporate purposes

(1) Intercompany credit agreement.agreement


In September 2015, we amended and restated our 50.0 billion yen senior unsecured revolving credit facility agreement, due to expire in March 2018, pursuant to which theThe Parent Company and Aflac jointly entered into a new five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for borrowings of up to 55.0 billion yen or the equivalent of yen in U.S. dollars on a revolving basis. This credit agreement provides for borrowings in Japanese yen or the equivalent of Japanese yen in U.S. dollars on a revolving basis. Borrowings bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (a) a eurocurrency rate determined by reference to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for the interest period relevant to such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (1) the federal funds effective rate plus ½ of 1%, (2) the rate of interest for such day announced by Mizuho Bank, Ltd. as its prime rate and (3) the eurocurrency rate for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%, in each case plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin ranges between .79% and 1.275% for eurocurrency rate borrowings and 0.0% and .275% for base rate borrowings, depending on the Parent Company’s debt ratings as of the date of determination. In addition, the Parent Company and Aflac are required to pay a facility fee on the commitments ranging between .085% and .225%, also based on the Parent Company’s debt ratings as of the date of determination. Borrowings under the amended and restated credit facility may be used for general corporate purposes, including a capital contingency plan for the operations of the Parent Company and Aflac. The amended and restated credit facility requires compliance with certain financial covenants on a quarterly basis and will expire on the earlier of (a) September 18, 2020, or (b) the date the commitments are terminated pursuant to an event of default, as such term is defined in the credit agreement. As of December 31, 2015, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under our 55.0 billion yen revolving credit agreement.


149



In February 2015, the Parent Company and Aflac jointly entered into an uncommitted bilateral line of credit with a third party that provides for borrowings in the amount of $50 million. Borrowings will bear interest at the rate quoted by the bank and agreed upon at the time of making such loan and will have a three-month maturity period. There are no related facility fees, upfront expenses or financial covenant requirements. Borrowings under this credit agreement may be used for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2015, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under our $50 million credit agreement.

We werewas in compliance with all of the covenants of ourits notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2015.2018. No events of default or defaults occurred during 20152018 and 2014.2017.



159


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


10. INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax expense (benefit) applicable to pretax earnings for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)Foreign U.S. Total
2018:           
Current $771
   $608
   $1,379
 
Deferred 93
   (409)   (316) 
Total income tax expense $864
   $199
   $1,063
 
2017:           
Current $722
   $(91)   $631
 
Deferred (24)   (1,193)   (1,217) 
Total income tax expense $698
   $(1,284)   $(586) 
2016:           
Current $650
   $234
   $884
 
Deferred 136
   388
   524
 
Total income tax expense $786
   $622
   $1,408
 

(In millions)Foreign U.S. Total
2015:           
Current $1,063
   $225
   $1,288
 
Deferred 42
   (1)   41
 
Total income tax expense $1,105
   $224
   $1,329
 
2014:           
Current $995
   $84
   $1,079
 
Deferred 125
   336
   461
 
Total income tax expense $1,120
   $420
   $1,540
 
2013:           
Current $934
   $302
   $1,236
 
Deferred 299
   123
   422
 
Total income tax expense $1,233
   $425
   $1,658
 


The Japan enacted an income tax rate reduction effective for the fiscal years beginning after March 31, 2012.year 2016 was 28.8%. The rate was reduced to 33.3% effective April 1, 2012,28.2% for the fiscal year 2017 and an additional reductionwas further reduced to 30.8% became effective28.0% for the fiscal year 2018.

For the United States, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Effective January 1, 2015.2018, the Tax Act imposed a broad number of changes in tax law, including the permanent reduction of the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%.

In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118) issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in December 2017, the Company recorded provisional amounts for certain items for which the income tax accounting was not complete. As of the enactment date, the Company estimated provisional amounts for its deferred taxes, including related valuation allowance, resulting in a reduction of its deferred tax assets (DTAs) by approximately $1.0 billion and its deferred tax liabilities (DTLs) by $2.9 billion, for a net DTL reduction of approximately $1.9 billion. The provisions of ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, require that the effects of changes in tax law on deferred taxes be recognized as a component of the income tax provision in the period the tax rate change was enacted. Therefore, the $1.9 billion provisional amount of net DTL reduction was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 as a reduction in the “Income tax expense, Deferred” line item of the Company’s consolidated statement of earnings.

In 2018, the Company recorded additional income tax expense of $.4 million resulting from a decrease in the SAB 118 provisional estimate related to Japan deferred tax balances. No further adjustment was made to the SAB 118 provisional estimate related to the valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2018, the Company has completed its accounting for the Tax Act in accordance with SAB 118.

Income tax expense in the accompanying statements of earnings varies from the amount computed by applying the expected U.S. tax rate of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017 and 2016 to pretax earnings. The principal reasons for the differences and the related tax effects for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Income taxes based on U.S. statutory rates $836
   $1,406
   $1,424
 
Foreign rate differential 220

 
0
   0
 
Write-down of U.S. deferred tax liabilities for tax reform change 0
   (1,933)   0
 
Utilization of foreign tax credit (3)   (27)   (30) 
Nondeductible expenses 21
   10
   8
 
Other, net (11)   (42)   6
 
Income tax expense $1,063
   $(586)   $1,408
 



160


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Income taxes based on U.S. statutory rates $1,352
   $1,572
   $1,685
 
Utilization of foreign tax credit (27)   (32)   (37) 
Nondeductible expenses 3
   5
   6
 
Other, net 1
   (5)   4
 
Income tax expense $1,329
   $1,540
   $1,658
 


Total income tax expense for the years ended December 31 was allocated as follows:

150
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Statements of earnings $1,063
   $(586)   $1,408
 
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during period 10
   52
   70
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:           
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment
securities during period
 (787)   575
   962
 
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses
on investment securities included in net earnings
 (12)   1
   18
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period 0
   0
   1
 
Pension liability adjustment during period (8)   3
   (16) 
Total income tax expense (benefit) related to items of
other comprehensive income (loss)
 (797)   631
   1,035
 
Additional paid-in capital (exercise of stock options) 0
   0
   (10) 
Total income taxes $266
   $45
   $2,433
 





(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Statements of earnings $1,329
   $1,540
   $1,658
 
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during period 16
   (419)   253
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:           
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment
securities during period
 (931)   2,237
   (904) 
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses
on investment securities included in net earnings
 21
   19
   19
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period 0
   (3)   (4) 
Pension liability adjustment during period (7)   (31)   55
 
Total income tax expense (benefit) related to items of
other comprehensive income (loss)
 (901)   1,803
   (581) 
Additional paid-in capital (exercise of stock options) 4
   (7)   (8) 
Total income taxes $432
   $3,336
   $1,069
 

The tax effect on other comprehensive income (loss) shown in the table above included a deferred income tax expense of $614 million in 2013, related to certain U.S. dollar-denominated investments that Aflac Japan maintained on behalf of Aflac U.S. As discussed in Note 1, prior to October 1, 2013, there was no translation adjustment to record in pretax other comprehensive income for the portfolio when the yen/dollar exchange rate changed, however deferred tax expense or benefit associated with the foreign exchange translation gains or losses on these U.S. dollar-denominated investments is recognized in total income tax expense on other comprehensive income until the securities mature or are sold. Excluding the tax amounts for these U.S. dollar-denominated investments from total taxes on other comprehensive income would result in an effective income tax rate on pretax other comprehensive income (loss) of 31% in 2013.

The income tax effects of the temporary differences that gave rise to deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)2018 2017
Deferred income tax liabilities:       
Deferred policy acquisition costs $3,404
   $3,285
 
Unrealized gains and other basis differences on investments 1,307
   2,882
 
Premiums receivable 149
   104
 
Policy benefit reserves 3,828
   3,557
 
Total deferred income tax liabilities 8,688
   9,828
 
Deferred income tax assets:       
Unfunded retirement benefits 8
   8
 
Other accrued expenses 40
   141
 
Policy and contract claims 775
   870
 
Foreign currency loss on Aflac Japan 38
   67
 
Deferred compensation 163
   155
 
Capital loss carryforwards 5
   0
 
Depreciation 119
   114
 
Anticipatory foreign tax credit 4,040
   4,504
 
Deferred foreign tax credit 591
   0
 
Other 150
   57
 
Total deferred income tax assets before valuation allowance 5,929
   5,916
 
Valuation allowance (738)   (657) 
Total deferred income tax assets after valuation allowance 5,191
   5,259
 
Net deferred income tax liability 3,497
   4,569
 
Current income tax liability 523
   176
 
Total income tax liability $4,020
   $4,745
 

The application of U.S. GAAP requires the Company to evaluate the recoverability of deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance if necessary to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not expected to be realized. As noted above, the Company has determined a $577 million valuation allowance against its anticipatory foreign tax credit is necessary. The anticipatory foreign tax credit represents the foreign tax credit the Company will generate from the reversal of Japan deferred tax liabilities in the future. The Company has also determined a $161 million valuation allowance against its deferred foreign tax credits is necessary. Deferred foreign tax credits are foreign tax credits generated in the current tax year by the Japanese life company, but are unable to be utilized until 2019

161


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions)2015 2014
Deferred income tax liabilities:       
Deferred policy acquisition costs $2,282
   $2,209
 
Unrealized gains on investment securities 1,684
   2,584
 
Premiums receivable 139
   139
 
Policy benefit reserves 1,313
   1,376
 
Depreciation 61

  51
 
Other 0

  20
 
Total deferred income tax liabilities 5,479
   6,379
 
Deferred income tax assets:       
Other basis differences in investment securities 1,422
   1,331
 
Unfunded retirement benefits 15
   16
 
Other accrued expenses 7
   4
 
Policy and contract claims 113
   99
 
Foreign currency loss on Japan branch 208
   327
 
Deferred compensation 181
   226
 
Capital loss carryforwards 0
   26
 
Other 95
   0
 
Total deferred income tax assets 2,041
   2,029
 
Net deferred income tax liability 3,438
   4,350
 
Current income tax liability 902
   943
 
Total income tax liability $4,340
   $5,293
 



151due to Japan's current tax year not closing until March 31, 2019. Based upon a review of the Company's anticipated future taxable income, and including all other available evidence, both positive and negative, the Company's management has concluded that, notwithstanding the items noted above, it is more likely than not that all other deferred tax assets will be realized.




Under U.S. income tax rules, only 35% of non-life operating losses can be offset against life insurance taxable income each year.year. For current U.S. income tax purposes, as of December 31, 2018, there were non-life operating loss carryforwards of $1$21 million expiring in 2035, and no tax credit carryforwards available at December 31, 2015.to offset against future taxable income. The Company did not have anyhas capital loss carryforwards of $22 million available to offset capital gains, at December 31, 2015.of which $4 million expires in 2021 and $18 million expires in 2023.


We fileThe Company files federal income tax returns in the United States and Japan as well as state or prefecture income tax returns in various jurisdictions in the two countries. The Company is currently under audit by the State of Georgia for tax years 2014-2016. There are currently no other open Federal, State, or local U.S. income tax audits. U.S. federal income tax returns for years before 20112015 are no longer subject to examination. In Japan corporate income tax returns for years before 2017 are no longer subject to examination. Management believes it has established adequate tax liabilities and final resolution of all open audits is not expected to have a material impact on the National Tax Agency (NTA) has completed exams through tax year 2012.Company's consolidated financial statements.


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows for the years ended December 31:
(In millions) 2018  2017 
Balance, beginning of year $14

 $294

Additions for tax positions of prior years 1
   0
  
Reductions for tax positions of prior years 0
   (280) 
Balance, end of year $15

 $14


(In millions) 2015  2014 
Balance, beginning of year $309

 $328

Additions for tax positions of prior years 0
   2
  
Reductions for tax positions of prior years (45)   (21) 
Balance, end of year $264

 $309



Included in the balance of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 20152018, are $261$14 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain, but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility, compared with $307$13 million at December 31, 20142017. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate, but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. The Company has accrued approximately $3$1 million as of December 31, 20152018, for permanent uncertainties, which if reversed would not have a material effect on the annual effective rate.


The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. WeThe Company recognized approximately $11$1 million in interest and penalties in 20152018, 2014compared with $1 million in 2017 and 2013$13 million in 2016. The Company has accrued approximately $22$2 million for the payment of interest and penalties as of December 31, 20152018, compared with $302 million a year ago.


As of December 31, 2015,2018, there were no material uncertain tax positions for which the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.


11.SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
See Note 1 for a discussion of the stock split that occurred in March 2018. All share and per-share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the stock split for any of the periods presented.


162


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


The following table is a reconciliation of the number of shares of the Company's common stock for the years ended December 31.
(In thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016
Common stock - issued:     
Balance, beginning of period1,345,762 1,342,498 1,339,446
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares1,778 3,264 3,052
Balance, end of period1,347,540 1,345,762 1,342,498
Treasury stock:     
Balance, beginning of period564,852 530,877 490,686
Purchases of treasury stock:     
Open market28,949 35,510 43,236
Other392 1,018 662
Dispositions of treasury stock:     
Shares issued to AFL Stock Plan(1,306) (1,782) (2,130)
Exercise of stock options(519) (734) (1,366)
Other(114) (37) (211)
Balance, end of period592,254 564,852 530,877
Shares outstanding, end of period755,286 780,910 811,621

(In thousands of shares)2015 2014 2013
Common stock - issued:     
Balance, beginning of period668,132 667,046 665,239
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares1,591 1,086 1,807
Balance, end of period669,723 668,132 667,046
Treasury stock:     
Balance, beginning of period225,687 207,633 197,453
Purchases of treasury stock:     
Open market21,179 19,660 13,212
Other247 157 222
Dispositions of treasury stock:     
Shares issued to AFL Stock Plan(1,209) (1,251) (1,365)
Exercise of stock options(465) (391) (1,734)
Other(96) (121) (155)
Balance, end of period245,343 225,687 207,633
Shares outstanding, end of period424,380 442,445 459,413

152



Outstanding share-based awards are excluded from the calculation of weighted-average shares used in the computation of basic EPS. The following table presents the approximate number of share-based awards to purchase shares, on a weighted-average basis, that were considered to be anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share at December 31:
(In thousands)2018 2017 2016
Anti-dilutive share-based awards 44
   510
   1,822
 
(In thousands)2015 2014 2013
Anti-dilutive share-based awards 1,862
   1,215
   2,198
 

The weighted-average shares used in calculating earnings per share for the years ended December 31 were as follows: 
(In thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016
Weighted-average outstanding shares used for calculating basic EPS769,588
 792,042
 822,942
Dilutive effect of share-based awards5,062
 5,819
 4,899
Weighted-average outstanding shares used for calculating diluted EPS774,650
 797,861
 827,841

(In thousands of shares)2015 2014 2013
Weighted-average outstanding shares used for calculating basic EPS430,654
 451,204
 464,502
Dilutive effect of share-based awards2,518
 2,796
 2,906
Weighted-average outstanding shares used for calculating diluted EPS433,172
 454,000
 467,408


Share Repurchase Program: During 2015, we purchased 21.22018, the Company repurchased 28.9 million shares of ourits common stock in the open market, compared with 19.735.5 million shares in 20142017 and 13.243.2 million shares in 2013. In August 2015, our board of directors authorized the purchase of an additional 40.0 million shares of our common stock.2016. As of December 31, 2015,2018, a remaining balance of 48.469.0 million shares of ourthe Company's common stock was available for purchase under share repurchase authorizations by ourits board of directors.


Voting Rights:In accordance with the Parent Company's articles of incorporation, shares of common stock are generally entitled to one vote per share until they have been held by the same beneficial owner for a continuous period of 48 months, at which time they become entitled to 10 votes per share.
Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The tabletables below is a reconciliationare reconciliations of accumulated other comprehensive income by component for the years ended December 31.



163


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
2015
20182018
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investment Securities
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
 Pension
Liability
Adjustment
 TotalUnrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investment Securities
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
 Pension
Liability
Adjustment
 Total
Balance, beginning of period $(2,541) $4,672
 $(26) $(126) $1,979
  $(1,750) $5,964
 $(23) $(163) $4,028
 
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle -
financial instruments
 0
 (148) 0
 0
 (148) 
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle -
tax effects from tax reform
 (325) 734
 (3) (32) 374
 
Other comprehensive
income (loss) before
reclassification
 345
 (1,646) 0
 (13) (1,314)  228
 (2,350) 2
 (30) (2,150) 
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(loss)
 0
 (40) 0
 0
 (40)  0
 34
 0
 13
 47
 
Net current-period other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 345
 (1,686) 0
 (13) (1,354)  228
 (2,316) 2
 (17) (2,103) 
Balance, end of period $(2,196) $2,986
 $(26) $(139) $625
  $(1,847) $4,234
 $(24) $(212) $2,151
 
All amounts in the table above are net of tax.
2017
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investment Securities
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
 Pension Liability Adjustment Total
Balance, beginning of period $(1,983)   $4,805
   $(24)   $(168)   $2,630
 
Other comprehensive
income (loss) before
reclassification
 233
   1,158
   1
   (6)   1,386
 
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(loss)
 0
   1
   0
   11
   12
 
Net current-period other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 233
   1,159
   1
   5
   1,398
 
Balance, end of period $(1,750)   $5,964
   $(23)   $(163)   $4,028
 

153



2014
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investment Securities
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
 Pension Liability Adjustment Total
Balance, beginning of period $(1,505)   $1,035
   $(12)   $(81)   $(563) 
Other comprehensive
income (loss) before
reclassification
 (1,036)   3,672
   (14)   (44)   2,578
 
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(loss)
 0
   (35)   0
   (1)   (36) 
Net current-period other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 (1,036)   3,637
   (14)   (45)   2,542
 
Balance, end of period $(2,541)   $4,672
   $(26)   $(126)   $1,979
 
All amounts in the table above are net of tax.



164


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


2013
20162016
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investment Securities
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
 Pension Liability Adjustment TotalUnrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investment Securities
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
 Pension Liability Adjustment Total
Balance, beginning of period $333
 $2,570
 $(5) $(183) $2,715
  $(2,196) $2,986
 $(26) $(139) $625
 
Other comprehensive
income (loss) before
reclassification
 (1,833) (1,499) (7) 92
 (3,247)  213
 1,854
 2
 (32) 2,037
 
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(loss)
 (5) (36) 0
 10
 (31)  0
 (35) 0
 3
 (32) 
Net current-period other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 (1,838) (1,535) (7) 102
 (3,278)  213
 1,819
 2
 (29) 2,005
 
Balance, end of period $(1,505) $1,035
 $(12) $(81) $(563)  $(1,983) $4,805
 $(24) $(168) $2,630
 
All amounts in the table above are net of tax.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, see Note 1 for discussion of the amounts reclassified between AOCI and retained earnings upon the adoption of new accounting pronouncements.

The tabletables below summarizessummarize the amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on source for the years ended December 31.


154



Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(In millions)2018 
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities
 $(63) Other-than-temporary impairment
losses realized
  17
 Other gains (losses)
  (46) Total before tax
  12
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $(34) Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:    
       Actuarial gains (losses) $(18) 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Prior service (cost) credit 0
 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
  5
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $(13) Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period $(47) Net of tax

(In millions)2015 
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities
 $214
 Sales and redemptions
  (153) Other-than-temporary impairment
losses realized
  61
 Total before tax
  (21) 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $40
 Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:    
       Actuarial gains (losses) $(17) 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Prior service (cost) credit 17
 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
  0
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $0
 Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period $40
 Net of tax
(1) Based on 35%27% blended tax rate
(2) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see
Note 14 for additional details).
 

165


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


(In millions)2014 2017 
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities
 $57
 Sales and redemptions $(29) Other-than-temporary impairment
losses realized
 (3) Other-than-temporary impairment
losses realized
 27
 Other gains (losses)
 54
 Total before tax (2) Total before tax
 (19) 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
 1
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
 $35
 Net of tax $(1) Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:      
Actuarial gains (losses) $(15) 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
 $(17) 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Prior service (cost) credit 17
 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
 0
 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
 (1) 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
 6
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
 $1
 Net of tax $(11) Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period $36
 Net of tax $(12) Net of tax
(1) Based on 35% tax rate
(2) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 14 for additional details).

155



(In millions)2013 2016 
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains
(losses)
 $7
 Sales and redemptions
 (2) 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
 $5
 Net of tax
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities
 $255
 Sales and redemptions $(83) Other-than-temporary impairment
losses realized
 (199) Other-than-temporary impairment
losses realized
 136
 Other gains (losses)
 56
 Total before tax 53
 Total before tax
 (20) 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
 (18) 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
 $36
 Net of tax $35
 Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:      
Actuarial gains (losses) $(19) 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
 $(15) 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Prior service (cost) credit 4
 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
 11
 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
 5
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
 1
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
 $(10) Net of tax $(3) Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period $31
 Net of tax $32
 Net of tax
(1) Based on 35% tax rate
(2) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 14 for additional details).


12. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
See Note 1 for a discussion of the stock split that occurred in March 2018. All share and per-share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the stock split for any of the periods presented.
As of December 31, 20152018, the Company has outstanding share-based awards under twothe Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). Share-based awards are designed to reward employees for their long-term incentive compensation plans.contributions to the Company and provide incentives for them to remain with the Company. The number and frequency of share-based awards are based on competitive practices, operating results of the Company, government regulations, and other factors.
The first plan, which expired inPlan, as amended on February 2007, is14, 2017, allows for a stock option plan which allowed grants for incentive stock options (ISOs) to employees and non-qualifying stock options (NQSOs) to employees and non-employee directors. The options have amaximum number of shares issuable over its term of 10 years. The exercise price75 million shares including 38 million shares that may be awarded in respect of awards other than options or stock appreciation rights. If any awards granted under this plan is equal to the fair market value of a share ofPlan are forfeited or are terminated before being exercised or settled for any reason other than tax forfeiture, then the Company's common stock atshares underlying the date of grant. Options granted beforeawards will again be available under the plan's expiration date remain outstanding in accordance with their terms.Plan.

166


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data



The second long-term incentive compensation planPlan allows awards to Company employees for ISOs, NQSOs,incentive stock options (ISOs), non-qualifying stock options (NQSOs), restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights. Non-employee directors are eligible for grants of NQSOs, restricted stock, and stock appreciation rights. As of December 31, 2018, approximately 40.3 million shares were available for future grants under this plan. The ISOs and NQSOs have a term of 10 years, and the share-based awards generally vest upon time-based conditions or time-time and performance-based conditions. Time-based vesting generally occurs after three years. Performance-based vesting conditions generally include the attainment of goals related to Company financial performance. As of December 31, 2015, approximately 10.1 million shares were available for future grants under this plan, and2018, the only performance-based awards issued and outstanding were restricted stock awards.

Stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the amended Plan have an exercise price of at least the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date and have an expiration date no later than 10 years from the grant date. Time-based restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock options granted after January 1, 2017 generally vest on a ratable basis over three years, and awards granted prior to the amendment vest on a three-year cliff basis. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the discretion to determine vesting schedules.

Share-based awards granted to U.S.-based grantees are settled with authorized but unissued Company stock, while those issued to Japan-based grantees are settled with treasury shares.
Summary of Share-Based Compensation Expense

Share-based compensation expense consists primarily of expenses for stock options, restricted stock awards (including performance based restricted stock awards), and restricted stock units granted to employees.
The following table presents the impact of the expense recognized in connection with share-based awards for the periods ended December 31.

156
(In millions, except for per-share amounts)2018 2017 2016
Impact on earnings from continuing operations $57
   $51
   $68
 
Impact on earnings before income taxes 57
   51
   68
 
Impact on net earnings 45
   35
   46
 
Impact on net earnings per share:           
Basic $.06
   $.05
   $.06
 
Diluted .06
   .05
   .06
 



Stock Options
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the employee stock option plan.
(In thousands of shares)Stock
Option
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 15,836
   $25.47
 
Granted in 2016 1,328
   30.70
 
Canceled in 2016 (362)   27.82
 
Exercised in 2016 (4,122)   24.46
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 12,680
   26.28
 
Granted in 2017 626
   35.80
 
Canceled in 2017 (236)   24.95
 
Exercised in 2017 (5,766)   30.11
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 7,304
   28.03
 
Granted in 2018 67
   44.59
 
Canceled in 2018 (167)   32.11
 
Exercised in 2018 (1,874)   26.78
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 5,330
   $28.54
 



167



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions, except for per-share amounts)2015 2014 2013
Impact on earnings from continuing operations $39
   $41
   $37
 
Impact on earnings before income taxes 39
   41
   37
 
Impact on net earnings 27
   28
   25
 
Impact on net earnings per share:           
Basic $.06
   $.06
   $.05
 
Diluted .06
   .06
   .05
 


(In thousands of shares)2018 2017 2016
Shares exercisable, end of year 3,917
   4,208
   8,986
 

We estimate
The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option granted using the Black-Scholes-Merton multiple option approach. Expected volatility is based on historical periods generally commensurate with the estimated terms of the options. We useThe Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and termination patterns within the model. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise patterns are stratified and considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of ourthe Company's option model and represents the weighted-average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. We baseThe Company bases the risk-free interest rate on the Treasury note rate with a term comparable to that of the estimated term of the options. The weighted-average fair value of options at their grant date was $9.46$8.81 per share for 2015,2018, compared with $16.24$7.64 for 20142017 and $14.25$6.35 in 2013.2016. The following table presents the assumptions used in valuing options granted during the years ended December 31.
 2018 2017 2016
Expected term (years) 7.0   5.9   6.4 
Expected volatility 22.0%  26.0%  27.0%
Annual forfeiture rate 3.6   3.4   3.2 
Risk-free interest rate 2.5   2.5   2.2 
Dividend yield 2.4   2.5   2.9 

 2015 2014 2013
Expected term (years) 6.3   6.3   6.6 
Expected volatility 20.0%  30.0%  34.0%
Annual forfeiture rate 2.8   2.7   1.6 
Risk-free interest rate 2.0   2.8   1.8 
Dividend yield 2.7   2.3   2.6 


The following table summarizes stock option activity.
(In thousands of shares)Stock
Option
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 12,737
   $45.00
 
Granted in 2013 703
   52.86
 
Canceled in 2013 (179)   44.79
 
Exercised in 2013 (3,281)   40.52
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 9,980
   47.03
 
Granted in 2014 678
   61.81
 
Canceled in 2014 (115)   52.01
 
Exercised in 2014 (1,236)   41.04
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 9,307
   48.84
 
Granted in 2015 855
   61.47
 
Canceled in 2015 (231)   55.70
 
Exercised in 2015 (2,013)   45.15
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 7,918
   $50.94
 
(In thousands of shares)2015 2014 2013
Shares exercisable, end of year 6,085
   7,497
   8,042
 


157



The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2015.2018.
(In thousands of shares)  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
 Range of
Exercise Prices
Per Share
  Stock Option
Shares
Outstanding
 Wgtd.-Avg.
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Yrs.)
 Wgtd.-Avg.
Exercise
Price
Per Share
 Stock Option
Shares
Exercisable
 Wgtd.-Avg.
Exercise
Price
Per Share
 $11.07
-$24.28
   1,181
   1.8   $20.76
   1,181
   $20.76
 
 24.75
-28.97
   1,718
   4.8   27.76
   1,026
   26.95
 
 29.04
-31.21
   1,226
   5.8   30.77
   1,221
   30.77
 
 31.22
-37.22
   1,134
   7.5   34.44
   488
   33.86
 
 38.76
-44.59
   71
   9.3   44.21
   1
   38.76
 
 $11.07
-$44.59
   5,330
   5.0   $28.54
   3,917
   $27.14
 

(In thousands of shares)  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
 Range of
Exercise Prices
Per Share
  Stock Option
Shares
Outstanding
 Wgtd.-Avg.
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Yrs.)
 Wgtd.-Avg.
Exercise
Price
Per Share
 Stock Option
Shares
Exercisable
 Wgtd.-Avg.
Exercise
Price
Per Share
 $14.99
-$43.07
   1,651
   3.1   $34.41
   1,651
   $34.41
 
 43.28
-48.56
   1,727
   3.2   47.05
   1,723
   47.05
 
 49.50
-57.90
   2,066
   4.9   54.18
   1,608
   55.01
 
 58.08
-61.81
   1,628
   5.1   61.50
   956
   61.79
 
 61.84
-67.67
   846
   7.8   62.96
   147
   63.96
 
 $14.99
-$67.67
   7,918
   4.5   $50.94
   6,085
   $48.45
 


The aggregate intrinsic value in the following table represents the total pretax intrinsic value, and is based on the difference between the exercise price of the stock options and the quoted closing common stock price of $59.90$45.56 as of December 31, 2015,2018, for those awards that have an exercise price currently below the closing price. As of December 31, 2015,2018, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding was $76$91 million,, with a weighted-average remaining term of 4.55.0 years. The total number of in-the-money stock options exercisable as of December 31, 2018, was 3.9 million. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercisable at that same date was $72$72 million,, with a weighted-average remaining term of 3.34.1 years.


The following table summarizes stock option activity during the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Total intrinsic value of options exercised $34
   $87
   $41
 
Cash received from options exercised 48
   58
   68
 
Tax benefit realized as a result of options exercised and
restricted stock releases
 25
   74
   45
 


Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards

Under the Plan, the Company grants selected executive officers performance-based restricted stock awards (PBRS) each February whose vesting is contingent upon meeting various performance goals. PBRS are generally granted at-the-money and contingently cliff vest over a period of three years, generally subject to continued employment. In February

168


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Total intrinsic value of options exercised $36
   $25
   $66
 
Cash received from options exercised 68
   39
   113
 
Tax benefit realized as a result of options exercised and
restricted stock releases
 25
   17
   30
 


2018, the Company granted 432 thousand performance-based stock awards, which are contingent on the achievement of the Company's financial performance metrics and its market-based conditions. On the date of grant, the Company estimated the fair value of restricted stock awards with market-based conditions using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The model discounts the value of the stock at the assumed vesting date based on a risk-free interest rate. Based on estimates of actual performance versus the vesting thresholds, the calculated fair value percentage pay-out estimate will be updated each quarter. Actual performance, including modification for relative total shareholder return, may result in the ultimate award of 0% to 200% percent of the initial number of PBRS issued, with the potential for no award if company performance goals are not achieved during the three-year period. PBRS subject to accelerated vesting at the date of retirement eligibility is recognized over the implicit service period.

The Company uses third-party analyses to assist in developing the assumptions used in, as well as calibrating, a Monte Carlo simulation model. The Company is responsible for determining the assumptions used in estimating the fair value of its share-based payment awards.

Key assumptions used to value PBRS granted during 2018 follows:
(In millions)2018
Expected volatility (based on Aflac Inc. and peer group historical daily stock price)16.48%
Expected life from grant date (years)2.9
Risk-free interest rate (based on U.S. Treasury yields at the date of grant)2.29%

Restricted Stock Awards and Units
The value of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units is based on the fair market value of our common stock at the date of grant. The following table summarizes restricted stock activity during the years ended December 31.
(In thousands of shares)Shares Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Per  Share
Restricted stock at December 31, 2015 3,630
   $29.21
 
Granted in 2016 1,756
   30.84
 
Canceled in 2016 (152)   30.33
 
Vested in 2016 (1,498)   26.84
 
Restricted stock at December 31, 2016 3,736
   30.88
 
Granted in 2017 1,118
   36.48
 
Canceled in 2017 (202)   32.23
 
Vested in 2017 (1,018)   31.09
 
Restricted stock at December 31, 2017 3,634
   32.40
 
Granted in 2018 1,121
   44.27
 
Canceled in 2018 (105)   34.39
 
Vested in 2018 (1,243)   31.64
 
Restricted stock at December 31, 2018 3,407
   $36.52
 

(In thousands of shares)Shares Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Per  Share
Restricted stock at December 31, 2012 1,363
   $50.19
 
Granted in 2013 782
   52.77
 
Canceled in 2013 (56)   48.63
 
Vested in 2013 (418)   47.49
 
Restricted stock at December 31, 2013 1,671
   52.12
 
Granted in 2014 584
   62.12
 
Canceled in 2014 (27)   52.66
 
Vested in 2014 (348)   56.95
 
Restricted stock at December 31, 2014 1,880
   54.33
 
Granted in 2015 638
   61.51
 
Canceled in 2015 (145)   57.52
 
Vested in 2015 (558)   48.41
 
Restricted stock at December 31, 2015 1,815
   $58.42
 


As of December 31, 2015,2018, total compensation cost not yet recognized in ourthe Company's financial statements related to restricted stock awards and restricted stock units was $44$36 million,, of which $20$15 million (849 (799 thousand shares) was related to restricted stock awards with a performance-based vesting condition. We expectThe Company expects to recognize these amounts over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.1 years.1.0 year. There are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested.





158169




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


13. STATUTORY ACCOUNTING AND DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS
OurThe Company's insurance subsidiaries are required to report their results of operations and financial position to state insurance regulatory authorities on the basis of statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by such authorities. Statutory accounting practices primarily differ from U.S. GAAP by charging policy acquisition costs to expense as incurred, establishing future policy benefit liabilities using different actuarial assumptions as well as valuing investments and certain assets and accounting for deferred taxes on a different basis.


Aflac the Company's most significant insurance subsidiary, reports statutory financial statements that are prepared on the basis of accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Nebraska Department of Insurance (NEDOI)(NDOI). The NEDOINDOI recognizes statutory accounting principles and practices prescribed or permitted by the state of Nebraska for determining and reporting the financial condition and results of operations of an insurance company, and for determining a company's solvency under Nebraska insurance law. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners' (NAIC) Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual (SAP) has been adopted by the state of Nebraska as a component of those prescribed or permitted practices. Additionally, the Director of the NEDOINDOI has the right to permit other specific practices which deviate from prescribed practices. Prior to the Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, Aflac hashad been given explicit permission by the Director of the NEDOINDOI for two such permitted practices. These permitted practices, which dodid not impact the calculation of net income on a statutory basis or prevent the triggering of a regulatory event in the Company's risk-based capitalRBC calculation, arewere as follows:


Aflac has reported as admitted assets the refundable lease deposits on the leases of commercial office space which house Aflac Japan's sales operations. These lease deposits are unique and part of the ordinary course of doing business in the country of Japan; these assets would be non-admitted under SAP.


Aflac entered into a reinsurance agreement effective March 31, 2015 with a then unauthorized reinsurer. The effective date of this agreement predated the effective date of Nebraska's Amended Credit for Reinsurance statute (44-416) allowing certified reinsurers and also predated the subsequent approval of the agreement's assuming reinsurer as a Certified Reinsurer, which occurred on August 30, 2015 and December 24, 2015, respectively. Aflac has obtained a permitted practice to recognize this treaty and counterparty as a Certified Reinsurer for the purpose of determining the collateral required to receive reinsurance reserve credit.


On April 1, 2018, the Company entered into a series of transactions in order to complete the conversion of the Japan branch into a Japanese insurance corporation. As a result of the conversion, the permitted practices were no longer necessary, therefore they were canceled by the NDOI effective April 2, 2018. A reconciliation of Aflac's capital and surplus between SAP and practices permitted by the state of Nebraska is shown below:below for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)2018 2017
Capital and surplus, Nebraska state basis $2,600
   $11,001
 
State Permitted Practice:       
Refundable lease deposits – Japan 0
   (43) 
Reinsurance - Japan 0
   (818) 
Capital and surplus, NAIC basis $2,600
   $10,140
 

(In millions)2015 2014
Capital and surplus, Nebraska state basis $11,298
   $10,839
 
State Permitted Practice:       
Refundable lease deposits – Japan (38)   (36) 
Reinsurance - Japan (707)   0
 
Capital and surplus, NAIC basis $10,553
   $10,803
 

As of December 31, 2015,2018, Aflac's capital and surplus significantly exceeded the required company action level capital and surplus of $1.3$.5 billion. As determined on a U.S. statutory accounting basis, Aflac's net income was $2.3$1.3 billion in 2015and $2.42018, $2.6 billion in20142017 and 2013.$2.8 billion in 2016.


Aflac Japan must report its results of operations and financial position to the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) on a Japanese regulatory accounting basis as prescribed by the FSA. Capital and surplus of theAflac Japan, branch, based on Japanese regulatory accounting practices, was $4.7$6.4 billion at December 31, 20152018, compared with $5.66.7 billion at December 31, 20142017. Japanese regulatory accounting practices differ in many respects from U.S. GAAP. Under Japanese regulatory accounting practices, policy acquisition costs are expensed immediately; policy benefit and claim reserving methods and assumptions are different; premium income is recognized on a cash basis; different consolidation criteria apply to VIEs; reinsurance is recognized on a different basis; and investments can have a separate accounting classification and treatment referred to as policy reserve matching bonds (PRM).


The Parent Company depends on its subsidiaries for cash flow, primarily in the form of dividends and management fees. Consolidated retained earnings in the accompanying financial statements largely represent the undistributed earnings of ourthe Company's insurance subsidiary. Amounts available for dividends, management fees and other payments

170


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


to the Parent Company by its insurance subsidiarysubsidiaries may fluctuate due to different accounting methods required by regulatory authorities. These payments are also subject to various regulatory restrictions and approvals related to safeguarding the

159



interests of insurance policyholders. Our insurance subsidiaryAflac must maintain adequate risk-based capitalRBC for U.S. regulatory authorities, and ourAflac Japan branch must maintain adequate solvency margins for Japanese regulatory authorities. Additionally, the

The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid to the Parent Company by Aflac without prior approval of Nebraska's director of insurance is the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. Dividends declared by Aflac during 20162019 in excess of $2.3$1.3 billion would require such approval. Aflac declared dividends of $2.4$12.3 billion during 2015.2018, including non-cash extraordinary dividends of $11.0 billion which represented the statutory book value of Aflac Japan on April 2, 2018.


AAfter the Japan branch conversion as of April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan is required to meet certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law in order to provide dividends to the Parent Company. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at Aflac Japan is basically defined as retained earnings excluding capital reserves, which represent equity generated by capital profits that are statutorily required in Japan, less net after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities based on the previous fiscal year-end. Prior to April 1, 2018, a portion of Aflac Japan earnings, as determined on a Japanese regulatory accounting basis, cancould be repatriatedremitted each year to Aflac U.S. after complying with solvency margin provisions and satisfying various conditions imposed by Japanese regulatory authorities for protecting policyholders. Profit repatriationsremittances to the United States cancould fluctuate due to changes in the amounts of Japanese regulatory earnings. Among other items, factors affecting regulatory earnings include Japanese regulatory accounting practices and fluctuations in currency translation of Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investments and related investment income into yen. Profits repatriatedremitted by Aflac Japan to the Parent Company, after April 1, 2018, and to Aflac U.S., prior to April 1, 2018, were as follows for the years ended December 31:
  
In Dollars In Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Profit remittances $808
   $1,150
   $1,286
   89.7
   129.3
   138.5
 

  
In Dollars In Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Profit repatriation $2,139
   $1,704
   $771
   259.0
   181.4
   76.8
 



We entered into foreign exchange forwards and options as part of an economic hedge on foreign exchange risk on 242.5 billion yen of profit repatriation received in 2015, resulting in $71 million of additional funds received when the yen were exchanged into dollars. As of December 31, 2015, we had foreign exchange forwards and options as part of a hedging strategy on 124.1 billion yen of future profit repatriation.

14. BENEFIT PLANS

Pension and Other Postretirement Plans
We haveThe Company has funded defined benefit plans in Japan and the United States, which cover substantially all of our full-time employees. Additionally, we maintainhowever the U.S. plan was frozen to new participants effective October 1, 2013. The Company also maintains non-qualified, unfunded supplemental retirement plans that provide defined pension benefits in excess of limits imposed by federal tax law for certain Japanese, U.S. and former employees. Effective October 1, 2013,employees, however the U.S. tax-qualified defined benefit plan was frozen to new employees hired on or after Octoberparticipants effective January 1, 2013 and to employees rehired on or after October 1, 2013.2015. U.S. employees who are not participants in the defined benefit plan receive a nonelective 401(k) employer contribution. Additionally, effective January 1, 2015, the U.S. non-qualified supplemental retirement plan was frozen to new participants.


We provideThe Company provides certain health care benefits for eligible U.S. retired employees, their beneficiaries and covered dependents ("other postretirement benefits"). The health care plan is contributory and unfunded. On October 1, 2013, a change was made to postretirement medical benefits to limit the eligibility for the benefits beginningEffective January 1, 2014, to includeemployees eligible for benefits included the following: (1) active employees whose age plus service, in years, equalsequaled or exceeds exceeded 80 (rule of 80)80); (2) active employees who arewere age 55 or older and have met the 15 years of service requirement; (3) active employees who willwould meet the rule of 80 in the next five years;years; (4) active employees who arewere age 55 or older and who willwould meet the 15 years of service requirement within the next five years; and (5) current retirees. Effective October 1, 2013, this change was accounted for as a negative plan amendment and resulted in a reduction to the postretirement benefit obligation of approximately $51 million, with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). Starting in the fourth quarter of 2013, this reduction is being amortized as a reduction to net periodic benefit cost over three years. The postretirement plan obligation was remeasured using a discount rate of 4.75% as of October 1, 2013. For certain employees and former employees, additional coverage is provided for all medical expenses for life.


Information with respect to ourthe Company's benefit plans' assets and obligations as of December 31 was as follows:




160171




  Pension Benefits Other
  Japan U.S. Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 20152014 20152014 20152014
Projected benefit obligation:                     
      Benefit obligation, beginning of year  $267
  $270
   $717
  $601
   $44
  $46
 
      Service cost  15
  15
   23
  20
   1
  1
 
      Interest cost  1
  9
   18
  38
   2
  2
 
      Actuarial (gain) loss  0
  21
   (6)  74
   (5)  (3) 
      Benefits and expenses paid  (7)  (9)   (17)  (16)   (2)  (2) 
      Effect of foreign exchange
rate changes
  0
  (39)   0
  0
   0
  0
 
               Benefit obligation, end of year  276
  267
   735
  717
   40
  44
 
                      
Plan assets:                     
      Fair value of plan assets,
beginning of year
  183
  182
   341
  313
   0
  0
 
      Actual return on plan assets  1
  12
   (6)  26
   0
  0
 
      Employer contributions  21
  24
   18
  18
   2
  2
 
      Benefits and expenses paid  (7)  (9)   (17)  (16)   (2)  (2) 
      Effect of foreign exchange
rate changes
  0
  (26)   0
  0
   0
  0
 
               Fair value of plan assets, end of year  198
  183
   336
  341
   0
  0
 
Funded status of the plans(1)
  $(78)  $(84)   $(399)  $(376)   $(40)  $(44) 
                      
Amounts recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income:
                     
      Net actuarial (gain) loss  $42
  $40
   $175
  $167
   $12
  $19
 
      Prior service (credit) cost  (2)  (2)   (4)  (4)   (11)  (28) 
               Total included in accumulated
other comprehensive income
  $40
  $38
   $171
  $163
   $1
  $(9) 
Accumulated benefit obligation  $244
  $235
   $621
  $611
     N/A
(2) 
 N/A
(2) 
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


  Pension Benefits Other
  Japan U.S. Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 20182017 20182017 20182017
Projected benefit obligation:                     
      Benefit obligation, beginning of year  $341
  $329
   $908
  $798
   $36
  $37
 
      Service cost  19
  20
   27
  24
   0
  0
 
      Interest cost  7
  6
   31
  40
   1
  1
 
      Actuarial (gain) loss  35
  (10)   (69)  65
   4
  0
 
      Benefits and expenses paid  (11)  (14)   (22)  (19)   (4)  (2) 
      Effect of foreign exchange
rate changes
  5
  10
   0
  0
   0
  0
 
               Benefit obligation, end of year  396
  341
   875
  908
   37
  36
 
                      
Plan assets:                     
      Fair value of plan assets,
beginning of year
  270
  229
   448
  359
   0
  0
 
      Actual return on plan assets  (9)  16
   (30)  61
   0
  0
 
      Employer contributions  34
  32
   69
  47
   4
  2
 
      Benefits and expenses paid  (11)  (14)   (22)  (19)   (4)  (2) 
      Effect of foreign exchange
rate changes
  5
  7
   0
  0
   0
  0
 
               Fair value of plan assets, end of year  289
  270
   465
  448
   0
  0
 
Funded status of the plans(1)
  $(107)  $(71)   $(410)  $(460)   $(37)  $(36) 
                      
Amounts recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income:
                     
      Net actuarial (gain) loss  $95
  $44
   $174
  $203
   $9
  $6
 
      Prior service (credit) cost  (2)  (2)   (4)  (4)   0
  0
 
               Total included in accumulated
other comprehensive income
  $93
  $42
   $170
  $199
   $9
  $6
 
Accumulated benefit obligation  $356
  $307
   $746
  $756
     N/A
(2) 
 N/A
(2) 
(1) Recognized in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets
(2) Not applicable
Pension Benefits OtherPension Benefits Other
Japan U.S.  Postretirement BenefitsJapan U.S.  Postretirement Benefits
2015 2014 2013  2015 2014 2013  2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016  2018 2017 2016  2018 2017 2016 
Weighted-average actuarial assumptions:                                                              
Discount rate - net periodic benefit cost1.75% 2.25% 2.25% 4.50% 4.75% 4.25% 4.50% 4.75% 4.25% 1.25% 1.25% 1.75% 3.75% 4.25% 4.50% 3.75% 4.25% 4.50% 
Discount rate - benefit obligations1.75
 1.75
 2.25
 4.50
 4.50
 4.75
   4.50
 4.50
 4.75
  1.25
 1.25
 1.25
 4.25
 3.75
 4.25
   4.25
 3.75
 4.25
  
Expected long-term return on plan assets2.00
 2.00
 2.00
 7.25
 7.50
 7.50
 N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
2.00
 2.00
 2.00
 6.50
 6.75
 7.00
 N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
Rate of compensation increaseN/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
 4.00
 4.00
 4.00
 N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
 4.00
 4.00
 4.00
 N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
Health care cost trend ratesN/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
 N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
  5.30
(2) 
5.70
(2) 
6.40
(2) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
 N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
  7.40
(2) 
5.40
(2) 
5.20
(2) 
(1) Not applicable
(2)For the years 20152018, 20142017 and 20132016, the health care cost trend rates are expected to trend down to 4.5%4.1% in 7861 years, 4.6%4.5% in 7877 years, and 4.6%4.5% in 7874 years, respectively.
We determine ourThe Company determines its discount rate assumption for ourits pension retirement obligations based on indices for AA corporate bonds with an average duration of approximately 20 years for the Japan pension plans and 17 years for the U.S. pension plans, and determination of the U.S. pension plans discount rate utilizes the 85-year85-year extrapolated yield

172


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


curve. In Japan,

161



participant salary and future salary increases are not factors in determining pension benefit cost or the related pension benefit obligation.


We base ourThe Company bases its assumption for the long-term rate of return on assets on historical trends (10-year(10-year or longer historical rates of return for the Japanese plan assets and 15-year15-year historical rates of return for the U.S. plan assets), expected future market movement, as well as the portfolio mix of securities in the asset portfolio including, but not limited to, style, class and equity and fixed income allocations. In addition, ourthe Company's consulting actuaries evaluate ourits assumptions for long-term rates of return under Actuarial Standards of Practice (ASOP). Under the ASOP, the actual portfolio type, mix and class is modeled to determine a best estimate of the long-term rate of return. WeThe Company in turn use those results to further validate ourits own assumptions.


Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plan. A one-percentage point increase and decrease in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects as of December 31, 20152018:
(In millions)    
One percentage point increase:    
Increase in total service and interest costs  $0
 
Increase in postretirement benefit obligation  1
 
     
One percentage point decrease:    
Decrease in total service and interest costs  $0
 
Decrease in postretirement benefit obligation  1
 
(In millions)    
One percentage point increase:    
Increase in total service and interest costs  $0
 
Increase in postretirement benefit obligation  2
 
     
One percentage point decrease:    
Decrease in total service and interest costs  $0
 
Decrease in postretirement benefit obligation  2
 

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Pension and other postretirement benefit expenses are included in acquisition and operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, which includes $25 million, $35 million and $17 million of other components of net periodic pension cost and postretirement costs (other than services costs) for the years ended December 31, included2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Total net periodic benefit cost includes the following components:
  Pension Benefits Other
   Japan  U.S. Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Service cost  $19
   $20
   $16
   $27
   $24
   $23
   $0
   $0
   $1
 
Interest cost  7
   6
   9
   31
   40
   29
   1
   1
   2
 
Expected return on plan
assets
  (6)   (5)   (4)   (26)   (24)   (23)   0
   0
   0
 
Amortization of net actuarial
loss
  1
   2
   1
   16
   14
   13
   1
   1
   1
 
Amortization of prior service
cost (credit)
  0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   (11) 
Net periodic (benefit) cost  $21
   $23
   $22
   $48
   $54
   $42
   $2
   $2
   $(7) 

  Pension Benefits Other
   Japan  U.S. Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Service cost  $15
   $15
   $16
   $23
   $20
   $22
   $1
   $1
   $5
 
Interest cost  1
   9
   10
   18
   38
   23
   2
   2
   3
 
Expected return on plan
assets
  (4)   (4)   (3)   (22)   (20)   (17)   0
   0
   0
 
Amortization of net actuarial
loss
  1
   1
   2
   14
   11
   15
   2
   3
   2
 
Amortization of prior service
cost (credit)
  0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   (17)   (17)   (4) 
Net periodic (benefit) cost  $13
   $21
   $25
   $33
   $49
   $43
   $(12)   $(11)   $6
 


Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table summarizes the amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss (income) for the years ended December 31:


162173




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  Pension Benefits Other
  Japan U.S. Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Net actuarial loss (gain)  $3
   $12
   $(14)   $22
   $67
   $(59)   $(5)   $(3)   $(7) 
Amortization of net actuarial loss  (1)   (1)   (2)   (14)   (11)   (15)   (2)   (3)   (2) 
Prior service cost (credit)  0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   (4)   0
   0
   (51) 
Amortization of prior
service cost
  0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   17
   17
   4
 
     Total  $2
   $11
   $(16)   $8
   $56
   $(78)   $10
   $11
   $(56) 


  Pension Benefits Other
  Japan U.S. Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Net actuarial loss (gain)  $52
   $(21)   $26
   $(13)   $28
   $27
   $4
   $0
   $(4) 
Amortization of net actuarial loss  (1)   (2)   (1)   (16)   (14)   (13)   (1)   (1)   (1) 
Amortization of prior
service cost
  0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   0
   11
 
     Total  $51
   $(23)   $25
   $(29)   $14
   $14
   $3
   $(1)   $6
 

Prior service credits of $51 million were incurred in 2013 for the plan amendment related to the change in eligibility for postretirement medical benefits mentioned above.
No transition obligations arose during 2015,2018, and the transition obligations amortized to expense were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016. Amortization of actuarial losses to expense in 20162019 is estimated to be $1$4 million for the Japanese plans, $13$11 million for the U.S. plans and $1 million for the other postretirement benefits plan. Amortization of prior service credits in 2016 is estimated to be $10 million for the other postretirement benefits plan due to the negative plan amendment in 2013. The amortization of prior service costs and credits for other plans and transition obligations for all plans is expected to be negligible in 2016.2019.


Benefit Payments
The following table provides expected benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate.
  Pension Benefits Other
(In millions) JapanU.S. Postretirement Benefits
2019  $12
  $25
   $3
 
2020  12
  26
   3
 
2021  12
  27
   4
 
2022  19
  36
   4
 
2023  15
  34
   4
 
2024-2028  89
  199
   17
 

  Pension Benefits Other
(In millions) JapanU.S. Postretirement Benefits
2016  $12
  $21
   $2
 
2017  7
  22
   3
 
2018  7
  23
   3
 
2019  9
  24
   3
 
2020  10
  25
   4
 
2021-2025  66
  170
   19
 


Funding


We planThe Company plans to make contributions of $20$33 million to the Japanese funded defined benefit plan and $10 million to the U.S. funded defined benefit plan in 2016.2019. The funding policy for ourthe Company's non-qualified supplemental defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefits plan is to contribute the amount of the benefit payments made during the year.


Plan Assets


The investment objective of ourthe Company's Japanese and U.S. funded defined benefit plans is to preserve the purchasing power of the plan's assets and earn a reasonable inflation-adjusted rate of return over the long term. Furthermore, we seekthe Company seeks to accomplish these objectives in a manner that allows for the adequate funding of plan benefits and expenses. In order to achieve these objectives, ourthe Company's goal is to maintain a conservative, well-diversified and balanced portfolio of high-quality equity, fixed-income and money market securities. As a part of ourits strategy, we havethe Company has established strict policies covering quality, type and concentration of investment securities. For ourthe Company's Japanese plan, these policies include limitations on investments in derivatives including futures, options and swaps, and low-liquidity investments such as real estate, venture capital investments, and privately issued securities. For ourthe Company's U.S. plan, these policies prohibit investments in precious metals, limited partnerships, venture capital, and direct investments in real estate. We areThe Company is also prohibited from trading on margin.


The plan fiduciaries for ourthe Company's funded defined benefit plans have developed guidelines for asset allocations reflecting a percentage of total assets by asset class, which are reviewed on an annual basis. Asset allocation targets as of December 31, 20152018 were as follows:


163174




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  Japan Pension U.S. Pension
Domestic equities  11%   43% 
International equities  15
   22
 
Fixed income securities  59
   35
 
Other  15
   0
 
     Total  100%   100% 


  Japan Pension U.S. Pension
Domestic equities  5%   40% 
International equities  18
   20
 
Fixed income securities  66
   40
 
Other  11
   0
 
     Total  100%   100% 


The U.S. Pension Plan had $39 million in cash at December 31, 2018. The plan fiduciaries authorized investing a contribution made to the Plan in 2018 on a graduated basis over a period of time.

The following table presents the fair value of Aflac Japan's pension plan assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31. All of these assets are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, except cash and cash equivalents which are classified as Level 1.hierarchy.
(In millions)2018 2017
Japan pension plan assets:       
     Equities:       
        Japanese equity securities $14
   $37
 
        International equity securities 50
   50
 
     Fixed income securities:       
        Japanese bonds 34
   91
 
        International bonds 160
   62
 
     Insurance contracts 31
   30
 
        Total $289
   $270
 
(In millions)2015 2014
Japan pension plan assets:       
     Equities:       
        Japanese equity securities $22
   $0
 
        International equity securities 33
   34
 
     Fixed income securities:       
        Japanese bonds 71
   72
 
        International bonds 48
   44
 
     Insurance contracts 23
   22
 
     Cash and cash equivalents 1
   11
 
        Total $198
   $183
 


The following table presents the fair value of Aflac U.S.'s pension plan assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31. All of these assets are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

(In millions)2018 2017
U.S. pension plan assets:       
     Mutual funds:       
        Large cap equity funds $120
   $124
 
        Mid cap equity funds 17
   22
 
        Real estate equity funds 13
   13
 
        International equity funds 92
   108
 
        Fixed income bond funds 179
   175
 
     Aflac Incorporated common stock 5
   5
 
     Cash and cash equivalents 39
   1
 
        Total $465
   $448
 

(In millions)2015 2014
U.S. pension plan assets:       
     Mutual funds:       
        Large cap equity funds $94
   $116
 
        Mid cap equity funds 16
   14
 
        Real estate equity funds 10
   10
 
        International equity funds 77
   61
 
        Fixed income bond funds 134
   136
 
     Aflac Incorporated common stock 4
   4
 
     Cash and cash equivalents 1
   0
 
        Total $336
   $341
 


The fair values of ourthe Company's pension plan investments categorized as Level 1, consisting of mutual funds and common stock, are based on quoted market prices for identical securities traded in active markets that are readily and regularly available to us.the Company. The fair values of ourthe Company's pension plan investments classified as Level 2 are based on quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are not active, other inputs that are observable, such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates, or other market-corroborated inputs.



175


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


401(k) Plan


The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan in which we matchit matches a portion of U.S. employees' contributions. The plan provides for salary reduction contributions by employees and in 2015, 2014, and 2013, providedprovides for matching contributions bywhich, starting January 1, 2018, the Company of 50%increased to 100% of each employee's contributions which were not in excess of 6%4% of the employee's annual cash compensation.


164



On January 1, 2014,compensation as a result of tax reform. In 2017 and 2016, the plan provided for matching contributions by the Company began providingof 50% of each employee's contributions which were not in excess of 6% of the employee's annual compensation. Also, as a result of U.S. tax reform legislation enacted in December 2017, the Company announced it would made a one-time contribution of $500 to the 401(k) plan to all employees active on December 31, 2017. This contribution was made by January 31, 2018. The Company also provides a nonelective contribution to the 401(k) plan of 2% of annual cash compensation for employees who elected to optopted out of the future benefits of the U.S.U. S. defined benefit plan during the election period provided during the fourth quarter of 2013 and for new U.S. employees who started working for the Company after September 30, 2013.U. S. employees.


The 401(k) contributions by the Company, included in acquisition and operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, were $9$18 million in 2015, $72018, $15 million in 20142017 and $5$11 million in 2013.2016. The plan trustee held approximately one2.7 million shares of ourthe Company's common stock for plan participants at December 31, 2015.2018.


Stock Bonus Plan


Aflac U.S. maintains a stock bonus plan for eligible U.S. sales associates. Plan participants receive shares of Aflac Incorporated common stock based on their new annualized premium sales and their first-year persistency of substantially all new insurance policies. The cost of this plan, which was capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs, amounted to $34$31 million in 20152018, compared with $36 million in 20142017 and $38 million in 2013.2016.
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
We haveThe Company has two outsourcing agreements with a technology and consulting corporation. The first agreement provides mainframe computer operations, distributed mid-range server computer operations, and related support for Aflac Japan. It has a remaining term of fivefour years and an aggregate remaining cost of 36.036.1 billion yen ($298($326 million using the December 31, 2015,2018, exchange rate). The second agreement provides application maintenance and development services for Aflac Japan. It has a remaining term of twofive years and an aggregate remaining cost of 2.48.6 billion yen ($20($77 million using the December 31, 2015,2018, exchange rate).


We haveThe Company has an outsourcing agreement with a management consulting and technology services company to provide application maintenance and development services for ourits Japanese operation. The agreement has a remaining term of twothree years with an aggregate remaining cost of 3.110.4 billion yen ($2694 million using the December 31, 2015,2018, exchange rate).


We haveThe Company has two outsourcing agreements with information technology and data services companies to provide application maintenance and development services for ourits Japanese operation. The first agreement has a remaining term of one year with an aggregate remaining cost of 637 million.6 billion yen ($5 million using the December 31, 2015,2018, exchange rate). The second agreement has a remaining term of twofour years with an aggregate remaining cost of 1.65.8 billion yen ($1352 million using the December 31, 2015,2018, exchange rate).


As of December 31, 2015, we have commitments of $182 million to fund potential future loan originations related to our investment in middle market loans. These commitments are contingent upon the availability of middle market loans that meet our underwriting criteria. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details on this investment program.

We leaseThe Company leases office space and equipment under agreements that expire in various years through 2026.2028. Future minimum lease payments due under non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2015,2018, were as follows:


(In millions) 
2019$63
202047
202135
202231
20238
Thereafter18
   Total future minimum lease payments$202



176


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions) 
2016$59
201744
201831
201910
20208
Thereafter20
   Total future minimum lease payments$172



We areThe Company is a defendant in various lawsuits considered to be in the normal course of business. Members of ourthe Company's senior legal and financial management teams review litigation on a quarterly and annual basis. The final results of any litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. Although some of this litigation is pending in states where large punitive damages,

165




bearing little relation to the actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, have been awarded in recent years, we believethe Company believes the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on ourits financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.


See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on certain investment commitments.

Guaranty Fund Assessments

The United States insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that is monitored and regulated by state insurance departments. These life and health insurance guaranty associations are state entities (in all 50 states as well as Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia) created to protect policyholders of an insolvent insurance company. All insurance companies (with limited exceptions) licensed to sell life or health insurance in a state must be members of that state’s guaranty association. Under state guaranty association laws, certain insurance companies can be assessed (up to prescribed limits) for certain obligations to the policyholders and claimants of impaired or insolvent insurance companies that write the same line or similar lines of business.

In 2009, the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner placed long-term care insurer Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company and its subsidiary American Network Insurance Company (collectively referred to as Penn Treaty), neither of which is affiliated with Aflac, in rehabilitation and petitioned a state court for approval to liquidate Penn Treaty. A final order of liquidation was granted by a recognized judicial authority on March 1, 2017, and as a result, Penn Treaty is in the process of liquidation. The Company estimated and recognized the impact of its share of guaranty fund assessments resulting from the liquidation using a discounted rate of 4.25%. The Company recognized a discounted liability for the assessments of $62 million (undiscounted $94 million), offset by discounted premium tax credits of $48 million (undiscounted $74 million), for a net $14 million impact to net income in the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The Company paid a majority of these assessments by March 31, 2018, and a majority of the tax credit will be realized over the next four years. The Company used the cost estimate provided as of the liquidation date by the National Organization of Life and Health Guaranty Associations (NOLHGA) to calculate its estimated assessments and tax credits. Other guaranty fund assessments for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were immaterial.

16. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA


In management's opinion, the following quarterly financial information fairly presents the results of operations for such periods and is prepared on a basis consistent with ourthe Company's annual audited financial statements.
 

177


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(In millions, except for per-share amounts)March 31,
2015
 June 30,
2015
 September 30,
2015
 December 31,
2015
Net premium income $4,432
   $4,364
   $4,380
   $4,394
 
Net investment income 782
   777
   784
   792
 
Realized investment gains (losses) 13
   127
   (114)   114
 
Other income (loss) (1)   19
   (10)   19
 
Total revenues 5,226
   5,287
   5,040
   5,319
 
Total benefits and expenses 4,213
   4,413
   4,176
   4,209
 
Earnings before income taxes 1,013
   874
   864
   1,110
 
Total income tax 350
   301
   297
   380
 
Net earnings $663
   $573
   $567
   $730
 
Net earnings per basic share $1.52
   $1.33
   $1.32
   $1.72
 
Net earnings per diluted share 1.51
   1.32
   1.32
   1.71
 
Quarterly amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding annual amounts due to rounding.
                
(In millions, except for per-share amounts)March 31,
2014
 June 30,
2014
 September 30,
2014
 December 31,
2014
Net premium income $4,854
   $4,888
   $4,841
   $4,489
 
Net investment income 827
   843
   841
   808
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (46)   102
   16
   143
 
Other income 5
   5
   38
   74
 
Total revenues 5,640
   5,838
   5,736
   5,514
 
Total benefits and expenses 4,536
   4,600
   4,662
   4,439
 
Earnings before income taxes 1,104
   1,238
   1,074
   1,075
 
Total income tax 372
   428
   368
   372
 
Net earnings $732
   $810
   $706
   $703
 
Net earnings per basic share $1.61
   $1.79
   $1.56
   $1.57
 
Net earnings per diluted share 1.60
   1.78
   1.56
   1.57
 

(In millions, except for per-share amounts)March 31,
2018
 June 30,
2018
 September 30,
2018
 December 31,
2018
Net premium income $4,745
   $4,706
   $4,636
   $4,591
 
Net investment income 837
   862
   870
   874
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (134)   3
   56
   (355) 
Other income (loss) 16
   18
   15
   16
 
Total revenues 5,464
   5,589
   5,577
   5,126
 
Total benefits and expenses 4,482
   4,458
   4,431
   4,404
 
Earnings before income taxes 982
   1,131
   1,146
   722
 
Total income tax 265
   299
   301
   197
 
Net earnings $717
   $832
   $845
   $525
 
Net earnings per basic share $.92
   $1.08
   $1.10
   $.69
 
Net earnings per diluted share .91
   1.07
   1.09
   .69
 
Quarterly amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding annual amounts due to rounding.
                
(In millions, except for per-share amounts)March 31,
2017
 June 30,
2017
 September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2017
Net premium income $4,638
   $4,665
   $4,648
   $4,580
 
Net investment income 794
   802
   811
   812
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (140)   (56)   30
   15
 
Other income (loss) 17
   17
   17
   17
 
Total revenues 5,309
   5,428
   5,506
   5,424
 
Total benefits and expenses 4,411
   4,383
   4,431
   4,425
 
Earnings before income taxes 898
   1,045
   1,075
   999
 
Total income tax 306
   332
   359
   (1,585) 
Net earnings $592
   $713
   $716
   $2,584
 
Net earnings per basic share $.74
   $.90
   $.91
   $3.29
 
Net earnings per diluted share .73
   .89
   .90
   3.27
 

Quarterly amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding annual amounts due to rounding.




166178




Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
There have been no changes in, or disagreements with, accountants on accounting and financial disclosure matters during the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 20142017.


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Disclosure Controls and Procedures


The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”))Act) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.


Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


(a) Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is incorporated herein by reference from Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(b) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Company's internal control over financial reporting is incorporated herein by reference from Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter of 20152018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.



167179




Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

PART III
Pursuant to General Instruction G to Form 10-K, Items 10 through 14 are incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive Notice and Proxy Statement relating to the Company's 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 17, 2016,22, 2019, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee Report and Compensation Committee Report to be included in such proxy statement shall be deemed to be furnished in this report and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 as a result of such furnishing in Items 10 and 11, respectively.




  
Refer to the Information Contained in the Proxy
Statement under Captions (filed electronically)
   
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Executive Officers -

see Part I, Item 1 herein
1. Election of Directors; Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance; The Audit and Risk Committee; Audit and Risk Committee Report; Director Nominating Process; and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Director Compensation; The Compensation Committee; Compensation Committee Report; Compensation Discussion and Analysis; 20152018 Summary Compensation Table; 20152018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards; 20152018 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End; 20152018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested; Pension Benefits; Nonqualified Deferred Compensation; Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-Control; and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation


ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSPrincipal Shareholders; Election of Directors (Proposal 1); Security Ownership of Management; and Equity Compensation Plan Information
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCERelated Person Transactions; and Director Independence
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICESRatification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal 3); and The Audit and Risk Committee


168180




Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPage(s)
     
  Included in Part II, Item 8, of this report: 
         Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries: 
                Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
       Consolidated Statements of Earnings for each of the years in the three-
           year period ended December 31, 20152018
  
       Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for each of the
           years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20152018
                Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152018 and 20142017
  
       Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for each of the years
           in the three-year period ended December 31, 20152018
  
       Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the
           three-year period ended December 31, 20152018
                Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
                Unaudited Consolidated Quarterly Financial Data
     
 2.FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 
     
  Included in Part IV of this report: 
              Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II -Condensed Financial Information of Registrant as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20152018
              Schedule III -Supplementary Insurance Information as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20152018
              Schedule IV -Reinsurance for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20152018
     
 3.EXHIBIT INDEX 
     
  An “Exhibit Index” has been filed as part of this Report beginning on the following page and is incorporated herein by this reference. 


Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because they are not required, are not material, are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.


In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this annual report, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.


Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.


169181





(b)
EXHIBIT INDEX(1)
 -    Articles of Incorporation, as amended – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2008, Exhibit 3.0 (File No. 001-07434).
 -    Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended and restated-restated – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated November 10, 2015, Exhibit 3.1 ( File No. 001-07434)
 4.0-    There are no instruments with respect to long-term debt not being registered in which the total amount of securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of Aflac Incorporated and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. We agree to furnish a copy of any long-term debt instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
 -    Indenture, dated as of May 21, 2009, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated May 21, 2009, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 -First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 21, 2009, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 8.500% Senior Note due 2019) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated May 21, 2009, Exhibit 4.2 (File No. 001-07434).
4.3-    Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2009, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 6.900% Senior Note due 2039) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 14, 2009, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 4.4-    Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2010, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 6.45% Senior Note due 2040) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated August 4, 2010, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 4.5-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2010, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York and Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.45% Senior Note due 2015) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated August 4, 2010, Exhibit 4.2 (File No. 001-07434).
4.6-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 10, 2012, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 2.65% Senior Note due 2017) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated February 8, 2012, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
4.7- Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 10, 2012, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 4.00% Senior Note due 2022) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated February 8, 2012, Exhibit 4.2 (File No. 001-07434).
 4.8-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2012, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 2.65% Senior Note due 2017) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated July 27, 2012, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
4.9- Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2013, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.625% Senior Note due 2023) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated June 10, 2013, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 4.10- Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 7, 2014, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.625% Senior Note due 2024) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated November 4, 2014, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 4.11- Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2015, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 2.40% Senior Note due 2020) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated March 9, 2015, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 4.12- Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2015, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.25% Senior Note due 2025) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated March 9, 2015, Exhibit 4.2 (File No. 001-07434).
 -Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 19, 2016, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 2.875% Senior Note due 2026) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 19, 2016, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
-Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 19, 2016, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 4.000% Senior Note due 2046) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 19, 2016, Exhibit 4.2 (File No. 001-07434).
-Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 25, 2017, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of .932% Senior Note due 2027) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated January 25, 2017, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
-Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.159% Senior Note due 2030) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 18, 2018, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
-Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.488% Senior Note due 2033) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 18, 2018, Exhibit 4.2 (File No. 001-07434).

182



-Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.750% Senior Note due 2038) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 18, 2018, Exhibit 4.3 (File No. 001-07434).
-Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 31, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 4.750% Senior Note due 2049) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 31, 2018, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).
- Subordinated Indenture, dated as of September 26, 2012, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 26, 2012, Exhibit 4.1 (File No. 001-07434).

170



 4.14- FirstSecond Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 26, 2012,October 23, 2017, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 5.50%2.108% Subordinated Debenture due 2052)2047) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 26, 2012,October 23, 2017, Exhibit 4.24.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.0*-    American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, as amended and restated October 1, 1989 – incorporated by reference from 1993 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.2 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.1*-    Amendment to American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, dated December 8, 2008 – incorporated by reference from 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.2*-Second Amendment to the American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, dated November 16, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2016, Exhibit 10.2 (File No. 001-07434).
-Third Amendment to the American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, dated October 18, 2016 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2016, Exhibit 10.3 (File No. 001-07434).
-    Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2009 – incorporated by reference from 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.5 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.3*- First Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2009 – incorporated by reference from 2012 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.3 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.4*- Second Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2009 – incorporated by reference from 2014 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.4 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.5*-    Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective September 1, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2015, Exhibit 10.5 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.6*-First Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective September 1, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2016, Exhibit 10.8 (File No. 001-07434).
-Second Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective September 1, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2017, Exhibit 10.9 (File No. 001-07434).
-Third Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective September 1, 2015.
- Aflac Incorporated 2013 Management Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from the 2012 Proxy Statement, Appendix B (File No. 001-07434).
 10.7*-Aflac Incorporated 2018 Management Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from the 2017 Proxy Statement, Appendix B (File No. 001-07434).
- 1999 Aflac Associate Stock Bonus Plan, amended and restated as of January 1, 2013 - incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2013, Exhibit 10.10 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.8*-    Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan – incorporated by reference from the 1997 Shareholders’ Proxy Statement, Appendix B (File No. 001-07434).
 10.9*-    Form of Officer Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.5 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.10*-    Form of Officer Stock Option Agreement (Incentive Stock Option) under the Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.6 (File No. 001-07434).

183



 10.11*-    Notice of grant of stock options and stock option agreement to officers under the Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.7 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.12*-    2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from the 2012 Proxy Statement, Appendix A (File No. 001-07434).
 10.13*- Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement (NQSO) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.1610.13 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.14*- Notice of grant of stock options to non-employee director under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.1710.14 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.15*- Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.1810.15 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.16*- Notice of restricted stock award to non-employee director under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.1910.16 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.17*- U.S. Form of OfficerEmployee Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.2010.17 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.18*- Japan Form of OfficerEmployee Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.2110.18 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.19*- Notice of time based restricted stock award to officers under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013, Exhibit 10.22 (File No. 001-07434).

171



 10.20*- Notice of performance based restricted stock award to officers under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.2310.20 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.21*- U.S. Form of OfficerEmployee Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.2410.21 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.22*- Japan Form of OfficerEmployee Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.2510.22 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.23*- U.S. Form of OfficerEmployee Stock Option Agreement (Incentive Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013,March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.2610.23 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.24*-Japan Form of Officer Stock Option Agreement (Incentive Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013, Exhibit 10.27 (File No. 001-07434).
10.25*- U.S. Notice of grant of stock options to officers under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013, Exhibit 10.28 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.26*- Japan Notice of grant of stock options to officers under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013, Exhibit 10.29 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.27*-Japan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.26 (File No. 001-07434).
-Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated May 1, 2017, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434).
-Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2017, Exhibit 10.33 (File No. 001-07434).
-Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2017, Exhibit 10.34 (File No. 001-07434).
-Notice of time based restricted stock unit and restricted stock unit agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434).
-2017 Notice of performance based restricted stock and restricted stock award agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.2 (File No. 001-07434).

184



-Notice of time based restricted stock unit and restricted stock unit agreement under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.3 (File No. 001-07434).
-2018 Notice of performance based restricted stock and restricted stock award agreement under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.4 (File No. 001-07434).
- Aflac Incorporated Retirement Plan for Directors Emeritus, as amended and restated, dated February 9, 2010 – incorporated by reference from 2009 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.26 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.28*- Amendment to Aflac Incorporated Retirement Plan for Directors Emeritus, as amended and restated, dated August 10, 2010 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.27 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.29*- Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Daniel P. Amos, as amended and restated, dated August 20, 2015 - incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2015, Exhibit 10.29 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.30*-Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Kriss Cloninger III, as amended and restated, dated August 20, 2015 - incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2015, Exhibit 10.30 (File No. 001-07434).
10.31*-Aflac Employment Agreement with Paul S. Amos II, as amended and restated, dated August 19, 2015 - incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2015, Exhibit 10.31 (File No. 001-07434).
10.32*- Aflac Employment Agreement with Eric M. Kirsch, as amended and restated, dated December 1, 2015 - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 1, 2015, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 10.33*-Amendment to Aflac Employment Agreement with Eric M. Kirsch, dated November 30, 2017 – incorporated by reference from 2017 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.42 (File No. 001-07434).
- Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Frederick J. Crawford, effective June 30, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated June 24, 2015, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434).
 11- Statement regarding the computation of per-share earningsAflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Charles D. Lake II, dated January 1, 2018 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for the Registrant.March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.5 (File No. 001-07434).
 12- Statement regarding the computation of ratio of earnings to fixed chargesAflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Audrey Boone Tillman, dated June 11, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for the Registrant.March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.6 (File No. 001-07434).
 -Basic Agreement regarding the “Strategic Alliance Based on Capital Relationship”, dated December  19, 2018, by and among Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd., Aflac Incorporated and Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 19, 2018, Exhibit 10.1 (File No. 001-07434).
-Letter Agreement, dated December 19, 2018, by and between Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. and Aflac Incorporated – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 19, 2018, Exhibit 10.2 (File No. 001-07434).
- Subsidiaries.
 - Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-158969 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated 401(k) Savings and Profit Sharing Plan.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-27883 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan.
  - Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement Nos. 333-135327, 333-161269, and 333-202781 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
  - Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-200570 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated Market Director Deferred Compensation Plan.
  - Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-115105 and 333-219888 with respect to the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan.
  - Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-197984333-219784 with respect to the AFL Stock Plan.

172



  - Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-203839333-227244 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated shelf registration statement.
 - Certification of CEO dated February 25, 2016,22, 2019, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 - Certification of CFO dated February 25, 2016,22, 2019, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 - Certification of CEO and CFO dated February 25, 2016,22, 2019, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 101.INS- 
XBRL Instance Document.(2)
Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
 101.SCH- XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

185



 101.CAL- XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
 101.DEF- XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
 101.LAB- XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
 101.PRE- XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
     
(1) 
Copies of any exhibit are available upon request by calling our Investor Relations Department at 800.235.2667 - option 3
(2)
Includes the following materials contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, (vii) Financial Statement Schedules.
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report.




173186





(c)FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Aflac Incorporated:

Under date of February 25, 2016, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Aflac Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, which are included herein. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedules as listed in Item 15. These financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statement schedules based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.


/s/ KPMG LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 25, 2016


174




SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT


Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Statements of Earnings
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
(In millions)2015    2014    20132018    2017    2016
Revenues:                                  
Dividends from subsidiaries(1)
 $2,393
      $1,483
      $962
 
Management and service fees from subsidiaries(1)
 260
      272
      292
  $190
      $297
      $265
 
Net investment income 22
      13
      11
  69
      30
      18
 
Interest from subsidiaries(1)
 6
      6
      7
  4
      5
      5
 
Realized investment gains (losses) 86
      45
      10
  90
      67
      84
 
Change in fair value of the cross-currency interest rate swaps (53)      314
      274
  (106)      (68)      (159) 
Other income (loss) 0
      (11)      1
 
Total revenues 2,714
      2,122
      1,557
  247
      331
      213
 
Operating expenses:                                  
Interest expense 231
      243
      208
  188
      197
      213
 
Other operating expenses 321
(2) 
     88
      79
 
Other operating expenses(2)
 225
      180
      277
 
Total operating expenses 552
      331
      287
  413
      377
      490
 
Earnings before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of
subsidiaries
 2,162
      1,791
      1,270
 
Income tax expense (benefit):                 
Current 2
      1
      0
 
Deferred (82)      120
      98
 
Total income taxes (80)      121
      98
 
Earnings before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries 2,242
      1,670
      1,172
 
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries(1)
 291
      1,281
      1,986
 
Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of
subsidiaries
 (166)      (46)      (277) 
Income tax expense (benefit) (12)      (23)      (102) 
Earnings before equity in earnings of subsidiaries (154)      (23)      (175) 
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries(1)
 3,074
      4,627
      2,834
 
Net earnings $2,533
      $2,951
      $3,158
  $2,920
      $4,604
      $2,659
 
(1)Eliminated in consolidation
(2)Includes expense of $230$13 in 2017 and $137 in 2016 for the make-whole payment associated with the early extinguishment of debt
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
 






175187





SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Net earnings $2,920
   $4,604
   $2,659
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes:           
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during period 232
   286
   283
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities during period (1)
 (3,109)   1,733
   2,799
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period 2
   1
   3
 
Pension liability adjustment during period (25)   9
   (45) 
Total other comprehensive income (loss) before
income taxes
 (2,900)   2,029
   3,040
 
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
 (797)   631
   1,035
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes (2,103)   1,398
   2,005
 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $817
   $6,002
   $4,664
 

  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Net earnings $2,533
   $2,951
   $3,158
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes:           
Foreign currency translation adjustments:           
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)
during period - parent only
 3
   39
   48
 
Equity in unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) of
subsidiaries during period
 357
   (1,494)   (1,636) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:           
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities
during period - parent only
 (8)   9
   (12) 
Equity in unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities
held by subsidiaries during period
 (2,526)   5,938
   (2,350) 
Equity in reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses of
subsidiaries included in net earnings
 (61)   (54)   (56) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period 0
   (17)   (10) 
Pension liability adjustment during period (20)   (76)   157
 
Total other comprehensive income (loss) before
income taxes
 (2,255)   4,345
   (3,859) 
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
 (901)   1,803
   (581) 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes (1,354)   2,542
   (3,278) 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $1,179
   $5,493
   $(120) 
(1) See Note 1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2018 related to financial instruments.
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.






176188





SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Balance Sheets
  December 31,
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2018 2017
Assets:       
Investments and cash:       
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value
(amortized cost $1,209 in 2018 and $1,163 in 2017)
 $1,222
   $1,213
 
Investments in subsidiaries(1)
 26,230
   26,869
 
Other investments 21
   51
 
Cash and cash equivalents 1,767
   1,725
 
Total investments and cash 29,240
   29,858
 
Due from subsidiaries(1)
 98
   90
 
Income taxes receivable 176
   121
 
Other assets 390
   366
 
Total assets $29,904
   $30,435
 
        
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:       
Liabilities:       
Employee benefit plans $310
   $341
 
Notes payable 5,765
   5,267
 
Other liabilities 367
   229
 
Total liabilities 6,442
   5,837
 
Shareholders' equity:       
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000 shares in 2018 and 2017; issued 1,347,540 shares in 2018 and 1,345,762 shares in 2017 135
   135
 
Additional paid-in capital 2,177
   2,052
 
Retained earnings 31,788
   29,895
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):       
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) (1,847)   (1,750) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities (2)
 4,234
   5,964
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives (24)   (23) 
Pension liability adjustment (212)   (163) 
Treasury stock, at average cost (12,789)   (11,512) 
Total shareholders' equity 23,462
   24,598
 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $29,904
   $30,435
 

  December 31,
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2015 2014
Assets:       
Investments and cash:       
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value
(amortized cost $481 in 2015 and $419 in 2014)
 $493
   $437
 
Investments in subsidiaries(1)
 20,500
   21,430
 
Other investments 9
   24
 
Cash and cash equivalents 1,721
   1,638
 
Total investments and cash 22,723
   23,529
 
Due from subsidiaries(1)
 113
   116
 
Other assets 582
   766
 
Total assets $23,418
   $24,411
 
        
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:       
Liabilities:       
Income taxes $8
   $6
 
Employee benefit plans 274
   282
 
Notes payable 5,008
   5,285
 
Other liabilities 420
   491
 
Total liabilities 5,710
   6,064
 
Shareholders' equity:       
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000 shares in
2015 and 2014; issued 669,723 shares in 2015 and 668,132 shares in 2014
 67
   67
 
Additional paid-in capital 1,828
   1,711
 
Retained earnings 24,007
   22,156
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):       
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (2,196)   (2,541) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities 2,986
   4,672
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives (26)   (26) 
Pension liability adjustment (139)   (126) 
Treasury stock, at average cost (8,819)   (7,566) 
Total shareholders' equity 17,708
   18,347
 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $23,418
   $24,411
 
(1)Eliminated in consolidation
(2) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2018 related to financial instruments.
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.






177189





SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:           
Net earnings $2,920
   $4,604
   $2,659
 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided from
operating activities:
           
              Equity in earnings of subsidiaries(1)
 (3,074)   (4,627)   (2,834) 
 Cash dividends received from subsidiaries 1,820
   2,001
   2,020
 
 Other, net 99
   (46)   294
(2) 
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 1,765
   1,932
   2,139
 
Cash flows from investing activities:           
Fixed maturity securities sold 207
   263
   225
 
Fixed maturity securities purchased (254)   (329)   (229) 
Other investments sold (purchased) 31
   (47)   6
 
Settlement of derivatives (2)   223
   0
 
Additional capitalization of subsidiaries(1)
 (62)   (69)   (36) 
Other, net (107)   (218)   (25) 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities (187)   (177)   (59) 
Cash flows from financing activities:           
Purchases of treasury stock (1,301)   (1,351)   (1,422) 
Proceeds from borrowings 1,020
   1,040
   986
 
Principal payments under debt obligations (550)   (1,161)   (621) 
Dividends paid to shareholders (793)   (661)   (658) 
Treasury stock reissued 58
   33
   46
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 34
   38
   36
 
       Net change in amount due to/from subsidiaries(1)
 (4)   (5)   (6) 
Other, net 0
   0
   (125)
(2) 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (1,536)   (2,067)   (1,764) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 42
   (312)   316
 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 1,725
   2,037
   1,721
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $1,767
   $1,725
   $2,037
 

  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:           
Net earnings $2,533
   $2,951
   $3,158
 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided from
operating activities:
           
              Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries(1)
 (291)   (1,281)   (1,986) 
 Change in income tax liabilities 6
   115
   155
 
 Other, net 149
(2 
) 
  (72)   11
 
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 2,397
   1,713
   1,338
 
Cash flows from investing activities:           
Fixed maturity securities sold 121
   38
   8
 
Fixed maturity securities purchased (202)   (105)   (206) 
Other investments sold (purchased) 14
   291
   (298) 
Settlement of derivatives 147
   (1)   0
 
Additional capitalization of subsidiaries(1)
 (43)   0
   0
 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 37
   223
   (496) 
Cash flows from financing activities:           
Purchases of treasury stock (1,315)   (1,210)   (813) 
Proceeds from borrowings 998
   750
   700
 
Principal payments under debt obligations (1,272)   (335)   0
 
Dividends paid to shareholders (656)   (654)   (635) 
Treasury stock reissued 36
   33
   88
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 47
   23
   41
 
       Net change in amount due to/from subsidiaries(1)
 43
   14
   28
 
Other, net (232)
(2 
) 
  0
   0
 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (2,351)   (1,379)   (591) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 83
   557
   251
 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 1,638
   1,081
   830
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $1,721
   $1,638
   $1,081
 
(1)Eliminated in consolidation
(2)Operating activities excludes and financing activities includes a cash outflow of $230$137 in 2016 for the make-whole payment associated with the early extinguishment of debt
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.






178190





SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(A) Notes Payable
A summary of notes payable as of December 31 follows:
(In millions)2018 2017
2.40% senior notes paid November 2018 $0
   $548
 
4.00% senior notes due February 2022 348
   348
 
3.625% senior notes due June 2023 698
   697
 
3.625% senior notes due November 2024 746
   745
 
3.25% senior notes due March 2025 447
   446
 
2.875% senior notes due October 2026 297
   297
 
6.90% senior notes due December 2039 220
   220
 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040 254
   254
 
4.00% senior notes due October 2046 394
   394
 
4.750% senior notes due January 2049 540
   0
 
Yen-denominated senior notes and subordinated debentures:       
.932% senior notes due January 2027 (principal amount 60.0 billion yen) 538
     528
  
1.159% senior notes due October 2030 (principal amount 29.3 billion yen) 262
   0
 
1.488% senior notes due October 2033 (principal amount 15.2 billion yen) 136
   0
 
1.750% senior notes due October 2038 (principal amount 8.9 billion yen) 79
   0
 
2.108% subordinated debentures due October 2047 (principal amount 60.0 billion yen) 536
   526
 
Yen-denominated loans:       
Variable interest rate loan due September 2021 (.32% in 2018 and 2017, principal amount 5.0 billion yen) 45
   44
 
Variable interest rate loan due September 2023 (.47% in 2018 and 2017, principal amount 25.0 billion yen) 225
   220
 
Total notes payable $5,765
     $5,267
  

(In millions)2015 2014 
3.45% senior notes paid August 2015 $0
    $300
   
2.65% senior notes due February 2017 652
(1) 
  653
(1) 
 
8.50% senior notes due May 2019 0
(2) 
  850
  
2.40% senior notes due March 2020 550
   0
  
4.00% senior notes due February 2022 350
   350
   
3.625% senior notes due June 2023 700
   700
  
3.625% senior notes due November 2024 749
(3) 
  749
(3) 
 
3.25% senior notes due March 2025 448
(3) 
  0
  
6.90% senior notes due December 2039 397
(3) 
  397
(3) 
 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040 448
(3) 
  448
(3) 
 
5.50% subordinated debentures due September 2052 500
   500
  
Yen-denominated Uridashi notes:        
2.26% notes due September 2016 (principal amount 10 billion yen) 83
     83
    
Yen-denominated Samurai notes:        
1.84% notes due July 2016 (principal amount 15.8 billion yen) 131
   131
  
Yen-denominated loans:        
3.60% loan paid July 2015 (principal amount 10 billion yen) 0
     83
    
3.00% loan paid August 2015 (principal amount 5 billion yen) 0
     41
    
Total notes payable $5,008
     $5,285
    
(1) Principal amount plus anAmounts in the table above are reported net of debt issuance premiumcosts and issuance premiums or discounts, if applicable, that isare being amortized over the life of the notesnotes.
(2) Redeemed
In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and have a 30-year maturity. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in April 2015
(3) Principalwhole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount net of an issuance discount that is being amortized over the life of the notes

During 2009, Aflac Japan bought to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the open market 2.0 billion yennotes to be redeemed, not including any portion of yen-denominated Uridashithe payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a United States Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, issued byplus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. In November 2018, the Parent Company which are outstanding asused the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of December 31, 2015. senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

In consolidation, those notes have been extinguished; however, they remain an outstanding liability forOctober 2018, the Parent Company until theirissued three series of senior notes totaling 53.4 billion yen through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled 29.3 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 12-year maturity. The second series, which totaled 15.2 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 15-year maturity.

191




The third series, which totaled 8.9 billion yen, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and has a 20-year maturity. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, date.in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.


The aggregate contractual maturities of notes payable during each of the years after December 31, 2015,2018, are as follows:
(In millions)    
2016$214
 
2017650
 
20180
 
20190
 $0
 
2020550
 0
 
202145
 
2022350
 
2023925
 
Thereafter3,600
 4,493
 
Total$5,014
 $5,813
 


For further information regarding notes payable, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

179



(B) Derivatives
At December 31, 2015,2018, the Parent Company's outstanding freestanding derivative contracts were swaps associated with ourits notes payable, consisting of cross-currency interest rate swaps, also referred to as foreign currency swaps, associated with ourthe Parent Company's senior notes due in February 2017, March 2020, February 2022, June 2023, November 2024 and March 2025, and subordinated debentures due in September 2052. We do2025. The Parent Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, nor do wedoes it engage in leveraged derivative transactions. For further information regarding these derivatives, see Notes 1, 4 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(C) Income Taxes
The Parent Company and its eligible U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Income tax liabilities or benefits are recorded by each principal subsidiary based upon separate return calculations, and any difference between the consolidated provision and the aggregate amounts recorded by the subsidiaries is reflected in the Parent Company financial statements. For further information on income taxes, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(D) Dividend Restrictions


See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding dividend restrictions.
(E) Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Interest paid $179
   $195
   $209
 
Noncash financing activities:           
Treasury stock issued for shareholder dividend reinvestment 8
   29
   26
 

(In millions)2015 2014 2013
Interest paid $235
   $241
   $205
 
Noncash financing activities:           
Treasury stock issued for shareholder dividend reinvestment 26
   26
   25
 


180192





SCHEDULE III
SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years ended December 31,
(In millions)Deferred Policy
Acquisition
Costs
 Future Policy
Benefits & Unpaid
Policy Claims
 Unearned
Premiums
 Other
Policyholders'
Funds
Deferred Policy
Acquisition
Costs
 Future Policy
Benefits & Unpaid
Policy Claims
 Unearned
Premiums
 Other
Policyholders'
Funds
2015:         
2018:         
Aflac Japan $5,370
 $64,437
 $7,739
 $6,285
  $6,384
 $80,672
 $4,977
 $7,145
 
Aflac U.S. 3,141
 9,696
 118
 0
  3,491
 10,864
 117
 0
 
All other 0
 43
 0
 0
  0
 183
 0
 1
 
Intercompany eliminations 0
 (687) 0
 0
  0
 (767) (4) 0
 
Total $8,511
 $73,489
 $7,857
 $6,285
  $9,875
 $90,952
 $5,090
 $7,146
 
2014:         
2017:         
Aflac Japan $5,211
 $60,036
 $8,509
 $6,030
  $6,150
 $76,353
 $5,840
 $6,939
 
Aflac U.S. 3,062
 9,239
 117
 0
  3,355
 10,506
 119
 0
 
All other 0
 1
 0
 1
  0
 138
 0
 0
 
Intercompany eliminations 0
 (748) 0
 0
 
Total $8,273
 $69,276
 $8,626
 $6,031
  $9,505
 $86,249
 $5,959
 $6,939
 
Segment amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)Net
Premium
Revenue
 Net
Investment
Income
 Benefits and
Claims, net
 Amortization of
Deferred Policy
Acquisition Costs
 Other
Operating
Expenses
 Premiums
Written
2018:                   
Aflac Japan$12,762
  $2,639
   $8,913
   $710
   $2,374
  $12,298
Aflac U.S.5,708
  727
   2,887
   534
   1,736
  5,707
All other207
  76
   200
   1
   420
  0
Total$18,677
  $3,442
   $12,000
   $1,245
   $4,530
  $18,005
2017:                   
Aflac Japan$12,752
  $2,463
   $9,087
   $630
   $2,257
  $12,092
Aflac U.S.5,563
  721
   2,885
   502
   1,658
  5,565
All other216
  36
   209
   0
   421
  0
Total$18,531
  $3,220
   $12,181
   $1,132
   $4,336
  $17,657
2016:                   
Aflac Japan$13,537
  $2,554
   $9,828
   $644
   $2,326
  $12,762
Aflac U.S.5,454
  703
   2,869
   497
   1,593
  5,452
All other234
  21
   222
   0
   513
  0
Total$19,225
  $3,278
   $12,919
   $1,141
   $4,432
  $18,214
(In millions)Net
Premium
Revenue
 Net
Investment
Income
 Benefits and
Claims, net
 Amortization of
Deferred Policy
Acquisition Costs
 Other
Operating
Expenses
 Premiums
Written
2015:                   
Aflac Japan$12,046
  $2,436
   $8,705
   $578
   $2,055
  $11,740
Aflac U.S.5,347
  678
   2,873
   488
   1,570
  5,343
All other177
  21
   168
   0
   573
  0
Total$17,570
  $3,135
   $11,746
   $1,066
   $4,198
  $17,083
2014:                   
Aflac Japan$13,861
  $2,662
   $10,084
   $649
   $2,364
  $13,352
Aflac U.S.5,211
  645
   2,853
   459
   1,474
  5,198
All other0
  12
   0
   0
   354
  0
Total$19,072
  $3,319
   $12,937
   $1,108
   $4,192
  $18,550
2013:                   
Aflac Japan$14,982
  $2,651
   $10,924
   $641
   $2,495
  $15,960
Aflac U.S.5,153
  632
   2,889
   433
   1,431
  5,144
All other0
  10
   0
   0
   310
  0
Total$20,135
  $3,293
   $13,813
   $1,074
   $4,236
  $21,104

Segment amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.










181193





SCHEDULE IV
REINSURANCE
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)Gross
Amount
 Ceded to
Other
Companies
 Assumed
from Other
companies
 Net
Amount
 Percentage
of Amount
Assumed
to Net
2018:               
Life insurance in force$151,457
  $4,702
   $0
  $146,755
  0% 
Premiums:               
Health insurance$15,330
  $541
   $214
  $15,003
  1% 
Life insurance3,688
  14
   0
  3,674
  0
 
Total earned premiums$19,018
  $555
   $214
  $18,677
  1% 
2017:               
Life insurance in force$152,502
  $4,121
   $0
  $148,381
  0% 
Premiums:               
Health insurance$14,829
  $554
   $222
  $14,497
  1% 
Life insurance4,046
  12
   0
  4,034
  0
 
Total earned premiums$18,875
  $566
   $222
  $18,531
  1% 
2016:               
Life insurance in force$151,093
  $3,741
   $0
  $147,352
  0% 
Premiums:               
Health insurance$14,839
  $595
   $241
  $14,485
  1% 
Life insurance4,753
  13
   0
  4,740
  0
 
Total earned premiums$19,592
  $608
   $241
  $19,225
  1% 
(In millions)Gross
Amount
 Ceded to
Other
Companies
 Assumed
from Other
companies
 Net
Amount
 Percentage
of Amount
Assumed
to Net
2015:               
Life insurance in force$146,610
  $3,547
   $0
  $143,063
  0% 
Premiums:               
Health insurance$13,604
  $509
   $186
  $13,281
  1% 
Life insurance4,300
  11
   0
  4,289
  0
 
Total earned premiums$17,904
  $520
   $186
  $17,570
  1% 
2014:               
Life insurance in force$144,374
  $3,298
   $0
  $141,076
  0% 
Premiums:               
Health insurance$14,648
  $339
   $10
  $14,319
  0% 
Life insurance4,764
  11
   0
  4,753
  0
 
Total earned premiums$19,412
  $350
   $10
  $19,072
  0% 
2013:               
Life insurance in force$157,022
  $3,245
   $0
  $153,777
  0% 
Premiums:               
Health insurance$15,393
  $98
   $12
  $15,307
  0% 
Life insurance4,840
  12
   0
  4,828
  0
 
Total earned premiums$20,233
  $110
   $12
  $20,135
  0% 

Premiums by type may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.




182194





SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Aflac Incorporated  
By:  /s/ Daniel P. Amos    February 25, 20162019
   (Daniel P. Amos)     
   Chief Executive Officer,     
   Chairman of the Board of Directors     


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
/s/ Daniel P. Amos
  Chief Executive Officer, February 25, 20162019
(Daniel P. Amos)  Chairman of the Board of Directors  
      
/s/ Frederick J. Crawford
  Executive Vice President, February 25, 20162019
(Frederick J. Crawford)  Chief Financial Officer  
      
/s/ June Howard
  Senior Vice President, Financial Services; February 25, 20162019
(June Howard)  Chief Accounting Officer  
 


183195









/s/ W. Paul S. Amos IIBowers
   Director February 25, 2016
(Paul S. Amos II)
/s/ W. Paul Bowers
DirectorFebruary 25, 20162019
(W. Paul Bowers)      
       
/s/ Kriss Cloninger IIIToshihiko Fukuzawa
   Director February 25, 20162019
(Kriss Cloninger III)Toshihiko Fukuzawa)      
       
/s/ Elizabeth J. HudsonDouglas W. Johnson
   Director February 25, 2016
(Elizabeth J. Hudson)
/s/ Douglas W. Johnson
DirectorFebruary 25, 20162019
(Douglas W. Johnson)      
       
/s/ Robert B. Johnson
   Director February 25, 20162019
(Robert B. Johnson)      
       
/s/ Thomas J. Kenny
   Director February 25, 20162019
(Thomas J. Kenny)      
       
/s/ Charles B. KnappKarole F. Lloyd
   Director February 25, 20162019
(Charles B. Knapp)Karole F. Lloyd)      
       
/s/ Joseph L. Moskowitz
   Director February 25, 20162019
(Joseph L. Moskowitz)      
       
/s/ Barbara K. Rimer
   Director February 25, 20162019
(Barbara K. Rimer)      
       
/s/ MelvinKatherine T. StithRohrer
   Director February 25, 20162019
(Katherine T. Rohrer)
/s/ Melvin T. Stith
DirectorFebruary 25, 2019
(Melvin T. Stith)      
       
/s/ Takuro Yoshida
DirectorFebruary 25, 2016
(Takuro Yoshida)






184196