UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.DC 20549


FORM 10-K


(Mark one)

[X]       ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934Form 10-K

(Mark one)
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended October 26, 2003
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from           to

For the fiscal year ended October 27, 2002


[  ]      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________to _________

Commission file number 0-6920

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.Applied Materials, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
94-1655526
Delaware
94-1655526
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRSI.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
3050 Bowers Avenue, PO Box 58039
Santa Clara, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
95054
(Zip Code)

3050 Bowers Avenue
Santa Clara, California 95054

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(408) 727-5555
(Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code)code

(408) 727-5555

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of classClass
Name of each exchangeEach Exchange on which registeredWhich Registered
None


NoneNone

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d)15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes [X]þ          No [  ]o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes [X]þ          No [  ]o

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of April 26, 2002,27, 2003, based upon the closing sale price reported by the Nasdaq National Market on that date:$38,814,856,29823,089,903,123. Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of December 20, 2002,26, 2003, based upon the closing sale price reported by the Nasdaq National Market on that date:$21,805,486,78237,501,091,957.

Number of shares outstanding of the issuer'sissuer’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, as of December 20, 2002: 1,650,306,172

26, 2003:1,681,469,908

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for Applied Materials, Inc.'s’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on March 20, 200324, 2004 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this

PART I
Item 1: Business
Item 2: Properties
Item 3: Legal Proceedings
Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Executive Officer of the Registrant
PART II
Item 5: Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6: Selected Financial Data
Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7a: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9: Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9a: Control and Procedures
PART III
Item 10: Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11: Executive Compensation
Item 12: Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13: Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 14: Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15: Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
SIGNATURES
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
EXHIBIT 10.35
EXHIBIT 10.36
EXHIBIT 10.37
EXHIBIT 12
EXHIBIT 21
EXHIBIT 23
EXHIBIT 24
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2


     This Annual Report on Form 10-K is forward-looking in nature. All statements included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or made by management of Applied Materials, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Applied),(Applied or the Company) contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact aremay be forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statementsThese include statements regarding Applied'sApplied’s future financial results, operating results, business strategies, projected costs and capital expenditures, products, competitive positions, and plans and objectives of management for future operations. In some cases, forward-lookingForward-looking statements canmay be identified by terminologyuse of words such as "may," "will," "should," "would," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "continue,"“may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “intend” and “continue,” or the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements alsoand include the assumptions that underlie such statements. Any expectations based onApplied’s actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward- lookingforward-looking statements are subject toas a result of various risks and uncertainties, and other important factors, including those discussedset forth in the section entitled "Item“Item 7: Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Trends, Risks and Uncertainties." These and many other factors could affect Applied's future financial and operating results, and could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations” All forward-looking statements in this report are based on forward-looking statements madeinformation available to Applied as of the date hereof and Applied assumes no obligation to update any such statements.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in this document or elsewhere by Applied or on its behalf.Annual Report. All references to fiscal year apply to Applied'sApplied’s fiscal year which ends on the last Sunday in October.

PART I
Item 1:Business

Item 1: Business

Organized in 1967, Applied, a Delaware corporation, develops, manufactures, markets and services semiconductor waferintegrated circuit fabrication equipment for the worldwide semiconductor industry. Customers for these products include semiconductor wafer manufacturers and semiconductor integrated circuit (or chip) manufacturers, who either use the chipssemiconductors they manufacture in their own products or sell them to other companies for use in advanced electronic components.

Most chips are built on a silicon wafer base and include a variety of circuit components, such as transistors and other devices, that are connected by multiple layers of wiring (interconnects). As the density of the circuit components is increased to enable greater computing power in the same or smaller area, the complexity of building the chip also increases, necessitating the formation of smaller structures and more intricate wiring schemes. To build a chip, the transistors, capacitors and other circuit components are first created on the surface of the wafer by performing a series of processes to deposit and remove selected film layers. Similar processes are then used to build the layers of wiring structures on the wafer. A typical, simplified process sequence for building the wiring portion of copper-based chips involves initially depositing a dielectric film layer onto the base layer of circuit components using a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) system. An etch system is then used to create openings and patterns in the dielectric layer. To form the metal wiring, these openings and patterns are subsequently filled with conducting material using physical vapor deposition (PVD) and/or electroplatingelectrochemical plating (ECP) technologies. A chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) step then polishes the wafer to maintain a flat surface. Additional deposition, etch and CMP steps are then performed to build up the layers of wiring needed to complete the interconnection of the circuit elements to form the chip. Advanced chip designs require about 500 steps involving these and other processes to complete the manufacturing of the wafer.cycle.

Applied operates primarily in a single industry segment for the manufacture, marketing and servicing of semiconductor waferintegrated circuit fabrication equipment. Applied currently manufactures systems that perform most of the primary steps in the chip fabrication process, including: atomic layer deposition (ALD), CVD, PVD, electroplating,ECP, etch, ion implantation, rapid thermal processing (RTP), CMP, wafer wet cleaning, metrology and wafer inspection. Applied'sApplied’s subsidiary, AKT, Inc. (AKT), manufactures CVD systems used to makeand array testers for making flat panel displays (FPDs) that are used in notebook computers, desktop monitors, televisions and other applications. Applied'sApplied’s subsidiary, Etec Systems, Inc. (Etec), is a leading manufacturer of systems used tothat generate, etch, measure and inspect circuit patterns on reticlesmasks used in the photolithography process. Applied also provides manufacturing facility (fab) management software to the semiconductor industry, as well asproducts and services to enhance manufacturing yields.

Most of Applied'sApplied’s products are single-wafer systems with multiple process chambers attached to a base platform. The simultaneous processing of several wafers enables high manufacturing productivity and precise control of the process. Applied sells most of its single-wafer, multi-chamber systems based on three main platforms:four basic mainframes: the Centura®, the Endura®, the Producer® and the Producer®.VantageTM platforms. These platforms currently support ALD, CVD, PVD, etch and RTP technologies.

Throughout its history, the semiconductor industry has migrated to increasingly larger wafers to build chips, from 25 millimeter (mm), or one-inch, wafers to 300mm, or 12-inch, wafers.its chips. The predominant wafer size used for capacityvolume production today is 200mm, or eight-inch, wafers. Towafers, but

2


many fabs are now transitioning to 300mm, or 12-inch, wafers to gain the economic advantages of a larger surface area, however, the industry has begun using 300mm wafers.area. Applied has developed and launchedoffers a comprehensive line of systems for processing both 200mm and 300mm wafer processingwafers.

     A majority of process steps used in chipmaking are performed to build the interconnect, a complex matrix of microscopic wires that carry electrical signals to connect the transistor and capacitor components of a chip. Customers are transitioning from using aluminum as the main conducting material for allthe interconnect to copper, which has lower resistance than aluminum and can carry more current in a smaller area. Applied is a leading supplier of its core technologies, supporting more than 90systems for manufacturing copper-based chips, ranging from the systems to deposit tantalum nitride barrier and copper materials to CMP products, for smoothing these layers for optimized planarity.

     Complementing the transition to copper to improve chip speed is the use of highly efficient low dielectric constant (low k) films to replace silicon dioxide as the insulator between the copper wiring structures. Applied leads the industry in providing a low k dielectric process applications. These new systems encompass almost 75 percentthat is being used in volume production by a number of semiconductor manufacturers.

     The transistor portion of the processes neededchip is another area in which semiconductor manufacturers are advancing their device designs to fabricate advanced 130 nanometer (nm)improve speed. Applied introduced several new products this year for these new applications, particularly in the areas of epitaxy, nitride and below devices on the wafer, includingtungsten deposition etch, RTP, CMP, wafer wet cleaning, ion implantation and inspection technologies.to enable these enhanced designs.

Products

The following summarizes Applied'sApplied’s portfolio of products and process technologies, most of which are available for both 200mm and 300mm wafer processing.technologies.

Deposition

Deposition
Deposition is a fundamental step in fabricating a chip.semiconductor. During deposition, a layer of either dielectric (material used as insulation between conductors) or electrically conductive (material(typically metal materials used to carry current, typically metals)current) film is deposited or grown on a wafer. Applied currently provides equipment to perform the four main types of deposition: ALD, CVD, PVDatomic layer deposition, chemical vapor deposition, physical vapor deposition and electroplating.electrochemical plating. Applied also offers certain types of dielectric deposition processes using its RTPrapid thermal processing systems.

Atomic Layer Deposition

Atomic Layer Deposition
ALD is an emerging technology in which single layers of atoms are used to build the chip.chip structures. This technology enables chipmakerscustomers to deposit a very thin layer of either conducting or insulating material with uniform coverage onin very small 65nm and below features.areas. Applied offers ALD process chambersprocesses for depositing tungsten titaniumand tantalum nitride (TiN) and tantulum nitride (TaN) films. In 2002,The Applied introduced the Endura iCuB/S™STM product is the industry'sindustry’s first system to integrate ALD and PVD chambers on a single platform for depositing the critical barrier and seed layers in copper interconnects. The Applied Centura iSprint Tungsten system combines an ALD chamber to deposit a tungsten nucleation film with a CVD tungsten bulk fill process on one system. The iSprint is used to form contact structures that connect the transistors to the wiring areas of the chip.

Chemical Vapor Deposition

Chemical Vapor Deposition
CVD is used by chipmakerscustomers to deposit dielectric and metal films on a wafer. During the CVD process, gases that contain atoms of the material to be deposited react on the wafer surface, forming a thin film of solid material. Films deposited by CVD may be silicon oxide, single-crystal epitaxial silicon, silicon nitride, dielectric anti-reflective coatings, lowk dielectric (highly efficient insulating materials), highk dielectric (electrical charge storingcharge-storing materials), aluminum, titanium, (Ti), TiN,titanium nitride, polysilicon, tungsten, refractory metals or silicides. Applied offers the following CVD products and technologies:

Producer- The Applied Producer CVD platforms feature Twin-Chamber™system — This high-throughput platform features Twin-ChamberTM modules that have two single-wafer process chambers per unit. Up to three Twin-Chamber modules can be mounted on each Producer platform, giving it a maximum simultaneous processing capacity of six wafers at a time for high-throughput manufacturing.wafers. Many of Applied'sApplied’s dielectric CVD processes can be performed on this platform. In 2002,The Applied introducedProducer Advanced Patterning Film™,FilmTM process is an innovative CVD hardmask film deposited with the Producer system that enables chipmakerscustomers to fabricate sub-50nmsub-50 nanometer (nm) transistor gates and contact structures using standard lithography. In fiscal 2003, the Company introduced the Applied Producer DARC 193 process, a dielectric anti-reflective coating that provides the precise dimensional control and compatibility needed for fabricating interconnects and transistors using advanced lithography methods.

The Applied Centura Ultima HDP-CVD® Centura -HDP-CVD®system High-density plasma CVD (HDP-CVD) is used to fill very small, deep spaces with dielectric film. One of the processes offered on the system is fluorinated

3


silicate glass (FSG), a film with higher insulating value than traditionally-used silicon dioxide material that enables faster chip performance. Applied'sThe Applied Centura Ultima HDP-CVD Centura product is used by a number of major chipmakerssemiconductor manufacturers for gap-fill applications, including the deposition of FSG in their advanced interconnect structures and deposition of silicon oxides in substrate isolation structures.

Lowk Dielectric Films- Throughout fiscal 2002, Applied continued its programs for developing dielectric films with — Many semiconductor manufacturers are now incorporating new lowk values to complement the trend of using copper material for even faster chip speeds. Applied offers several lowk dielectric materials using its establishedin their new copper-based chip designs to improve interconnect speed. The Applied Producer Black DiamondTM CVD technologies.low k process is being used by customers in volume production to produce some of the industry’s most advanced devices. Using conventional CVD equipment, the Black Diamond™ ,Diamond process has provided customers with a silicon-basedcost-effective way to transition to this new and challenging material. A complementary lowk dielectric film, is designed for copper-based interconnect structures. A second lowk dielectric, called BLOkthe Applied Producer BLOkTM (Barrier Lowk ), provides a lowk solution for critical barrier layers in semiconductor devices, enabling k) enables the complete, multi-layer dielectric chip structure to benefit from lowk technology.

Epitaxial Deposition - Epitaxial silicon (epitaxy or epi), used in some semiconductor devices, is a layer of pure silicon grown in a uniform crystalline structure on the wafer to form a high quality base for the device circuitry. Epi technology is used in an increasing number of semiconductor devices in both the wafer substrate and transistor areas of a chip to enhance speed. The Applied has manufactured epitaxial deposition systems for over 30 years. Applied'sCentura Epi Centurasystem integrates pre- and post-epi processes on the same system to improve film quality and reduce total epi production costs. Launched in fiscal 2003, the Applied Centura RP Epi system offers selective epi processes for transistor-level applications. In addition to silicon applications, the Company offers the Applied offers anCentura Epi Centura system for silicon-germanium (SiGe) epi process technology, which can reduce power usage and increase speed in certain kindstypes of advanced chips.

Polysilicon Deposition - Polysilicon is a type of silicon used to form portions of the transistor structure within the semiconductor device. Applied's PolyGen™The Applied Centura PolygenTM LPCVD (low pressure chemical vapor deposition) system is a single-wafer, multi-chamber product that deposits thin polysilicon films at high temperatures with high productivity and process control. A variant of the system, the Applied Centura Polycide Centura,LPCVD product, combines chambers for polysilicon and tungsten silicide deposition on the Centura platform in an integrated process to create transistor gate structures in memory chips. To address the challenging requirements of 130nm and below devices, the Applied offers itsCentura DPN (decoupled plasma nitridation) system integrates chambers for DPN and RTP oxidation and polysilicon deposition technologiesanneal on one system called the Gate Stack Centura, which providesplatform to enable superior film quality, material properties and process control.

Silicon Nitride Deposition - — The Applied offersCentura SiNgenTM LPCVD system is a single-wafer, high-temperature system to depositthat deposits silicon nitride films called the SiNgen™ Centura.in transistor-area applications. This system minimizes the amount of time the wafer is exposed to high temperatures and reduces particles while improving many areas of operating cost and productivity in critical transistor nitride layers for sub-130nm130nm and below devices. The system also features the DPN chamber which uses a plasma process to incorporate a high concentration of nitrogen into the gate oxide to prevent leakage in devices with 90nm and below designs.

Tungsten Deposition - Tungsten material is used in the “contact” area of a chip that connects the transistors to the wiring circuitry. In aluminum-based devices, tungsten is also used in the structures that connect the multiple layers of wiring on aluminum-based chips. Applied's Sprint™ Plusaluminum wiring. The Company has two products for depositing tungsten: the Applied Centura wasSprintTM Tungsten CVD system for 130nm and 90nm devices and the first system to provide integratedadvanced Applied Centura iSprint ALD/CVD system. The latter product combines ALD technology and CVD technologieschambers on the same platform for fabricating advanced tungsten contact structures.65nm and below applications.

Physical Vapor Deposition

Physical Vapor Deposition
PVD, also called sputtering, is a physical process in which atoms of a gas, such as argon, are accelerated at a metal target. The metal atoms chip off, or sputter away, and are then deposited on the wafer. The Applied Endura PVD platformsystem offers a broad range of advanced deposition processes, including aluminum, aluminum alloys, cobalt, Ti/TiN, Ta/TaNtitanium/ titanium nitride, tantalum/ tantalum nitride, tungsten/ tungsten nitride, nickel vanadium and copper (Cu). The Endura'sApplied Endura CuB/S (copper barrier/seed) PVD system, launched in fiscal 1998, is widely used by customers for fabricating copper-based chips. Using PVD technology, the system deposits the critical layers that prevent copper material from entering other areas of the device and primes the structure for the subsequent deposition of bulk copper material by electrochemical plating.

     The Endura’s highly flexible, multi-chamber architecture allows the integration of multiple PVD processes or combinations of metal CVD and PVD technologies on the same system. In addition to the integrated Applied Endura iCuB/S (ALD TaN and ALD/PVD seed) system discussed(discussed in the Atomic Layer Deposition section,section), the Endura'sApplied Endura iLB PVD/CVD system combines a PVD Ti technology can be combinedchamber for depositing titanium with eithera CVD TiN, ALD TiN or PVD TiN processeschamber for titanium nitride deposition to form the critical lining layers of interconnect structures. These structures are subsequently filled with tungsten, aluminum, copper or other film materials. Advanced SIP™ (self-ionized plasma) technology for depositing critical barrier/seed films in copper-based devices and liner/barrier films in aluminum-based chips extends PVD to sub-100nm geometries.

Systems for Copper-Based Devices - A majority of process steps used in chipmaking are performed to build the interconnect, a complex matrix of microscopic wires that carry electrical signals to connect the transistor and capacitor components of a chip. Chipmakers are transitioning from using aluminum as the main conducting material for the interconnect to copper, which has lower resistance than aluminum and can carry more current in a smaller area.

Applied is a leading supplier of systems for copper-based chipmaking, with products that perform deposition of the barrier and seed layers (Endura Electra Cu® Barrier & Seed), copper fill by electroplating (Electra Cu ECP), and copper planarization by CMP (Mirra Mesa™ system). In addition, Applied makes a full line of systems for depositing and etching the dielectric layers used in the copper interconnect and for inspection and metrology.4

The Endura Electra Cu Barrier & Seed system, launched in fiscal 1998, is widely used by chipmakers for fabricating copper-based chips. Using PVD technology, the system sequentially deposits the critical layers that prevent copper material from entering other areas of the device and prime the structure for subsequent deposition of bulk copper material by electroplating.


Electroplating
Electroplating

Electrochemical Plating

     Electrochemical plating is a process by which metal atoms from a chemical fluid (an electrolyte) are deposited on the surface of an object immersed object. Its main application in the electrolyte. Its main applicationsemiconductor industry is to deposit copper in interconnect wiring structures followingstructures. This process step follows the deposition of barrier and seed layers.layers which prevent the copper from contaminating other areas of the device and improve the adhesion of the copper film.

The Electra CuApplied SlimCell ECP (electrochemical plating) system introduced in fiscal 2003, offers automated ECPa new small-volume cell design that allows independent bath chemistry for multi-step processing. The system enables a reduction in defect levels compared to conventional large bath systems while reducing chemical management technology, and its high-throughput system architecture allows the simultaneous processing of four wafers. The Electra Cu ECP product combines copper deposition with critical heat treatment and wafer edge clean processes on a single platform.consumption.

Etch

Etch
Etching is used many times throughout the semiconductor manufacturing process to selectively remove material from the surface of a wafer. Before etching begins, the wafer is coated with a light-sensitive film, called photoresist, and is exposed to a circuit pattern during aphotoresist. A photolithography process step thatthen projects the circuit pattern onto the wafer. Etching removes material only from areas dictated by the photoresist pattern.

Applied offers a full range of systems for etching three basic typesdielectric, metal and silicon films to meet the requirements of materials: metal, siliconsub-100nm processing.

For dielectric applications, the Applied Centura eMaxTM system etches a broad range of films in the contact and dielectric films. For etching dielectric films,interconnect regions of the chip. The recently introduced high-throughput Applied Producer Etch system targets cost-driven etch applications with 90nm and below design geometries. To address advanced low k etch applications, the Company introduced the Dielectricits Applied Centura EnablerTM Etch eMax™ Entek™ Centura system in fiscal 2002. This system, an extension of Applied's eMax technology, etches lowk dielectric materials found2003 that performs etch, strip and clean steps in high-performance copper-based chips.a single chamber. The Enabler’s all-in-one capability streamlines the process flow for 65nm and below chip designs and significantly reduces operating costs.

For etching advancedThe Applied Centura DPS Etch systems are used to etch conducting films, Applied's Metal Etch DPS™ IIsuch as metal and Silicon Etch DPS™ II Centura systemssilicon materials, and offer customers the technology, productivity and reliability required for 100nm and below processing. The Transforma™ etchApplied Centura TransformaTM Etch patterning system combines silicon etch technology with new integrated metrology capability to enable chipmakerscustomers to improve process control, device yield and overall fab cycle time for building advanced transistor gate structures.

Ion Implantation

Ion Implantation
During ion implantation, silicon wafers are bombarded by a beam of ions, called dopants, that penetrate (or implant) the film surface to a desired depth. Implantation occurs in theThe implantation step is used during transistor structure and changesfabrication to change the properties of thea material in which the dopants are implanted toand achieve a particular electrical performance.

Low-energy, high current implant technology enablesis key to enabling the fabrication of smaller structures, andwhich contributes to faster transistor performance. Applied's Quantum™ LEAP (low-energy advanced processing)The Applied QuantumTM II system enables chipmakersprovides customers with the capability to create thinner, morethin, advanced transistor structures. An enhanced-performance line of high-current implanters, the Quantum II, was introduced in 2002structures for sub-100nm applications.

Rapid Thermal Processing

Applied's Swift® system combines the functions of two traditional implant technologies - high-energy and medium current - in one system. This system introduces several advances in doping accuracy and wafer positioning required for the 100nm device generation.

Rapid Thermal Processing
RTP subjects a wafer to a very brief burstrapid bursts of intense heat that can take the wafer from room temperature to more than 1,000 degrees Celsius in less than 10 seconds. RTP is used mainly for modifying the properties of deposited films. Applied'sThe Applied Centura XE+ and Radiance® RTP systems offer advances in temperature and ramp rate control as well as other features aimed at providing leading-edge capability for sub-130nm micron generations. These single-wafer systems are also used for growing high quality oxide and oxynitride films, deposition steps that have traditionally been assigned to furnaces. This trend to single-wafer processing versustraditional batch furnaces is expected to continue ascan no longer achieve with the industry transitions to larger 300mm wafers. In 2002,necessary precision and control. The Company also offers the Applied introduced the Radiance™ Vantage™Vantage Radiance RTP system, a new streamlined platform designed for high-volume 300mm manufacturing.

Chemical Mechanical Polishing

Chemical Mechanical Polishing
CMP removes material from a wafer to create a flat (planarized) surface. This allows subsequent photolithography patterning steps to take place with greater accuracy and enables film layers to build up with minimal height variations. CMP is performed primarily in the interconnect structure of the chip, where it is used multiple times, and is crucial to fabricating copper-based chips to define the circuit wires that create the interconnect. Applied entered the CMP market in 1995 with its Mirra® system and has since added several important features to this product, including integrated cleaning, film measurement and inspectionprocess control capabilities. The Mirra Mesa system also provides customers with integrated cleaning technology. In 2002,fiscal 2003, Applied introduced a unique fixed abrasive technologynew system on its 300mm Applied Reflexion® CMP platform, the Reflexion™ platform, enabling a slurry-free process thatApplied Reflexion LK system, for polishing the delicate copper/low k interconnects using low downforce, high-throughput technology. The Reflexion LK is the only CMP system in the industry to

5


integrate single-wafer full immersion vapor drying capability for eliminating defects and improving device yields during the cleaning process.
Metrology and Wafer Inspection

Applied offers improved performance for certain polishing applications.

Wafer Wet Cleaning
Applied entered the wafer wet cleaning market in fiscal 2002 with its Oasis Clean™ system, which uses single-wafer technology to clean wafers of contaminants. The Oasis Clean system utilizes proprietary megasonics technology with unique cleaning chemistry and system architecture to offer chipmakers improved cleaning performance and reduced operating costs over batch-type systems.

Metrology and Wafer/Reticle Inspection
Applied produces several types of products that are used to inspect the wafer during various stages of the fabrication process.process in the following categories:

Critical Dimension and Defect Review Scanning Electron Microscopes (CD-SEMs and DR-SEMs)

Critical Dimension and Defect Review Scanning Electron Microscopes (CD-SEMs and DR-SEMs)
Scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) use an electron beam to form images of microscopic features of a semiconductor wafer at extremely high magnification. Applied provides chipmakerscustomers with full automation, along with the high accuracy and sensitivity needed for measuring advanced-generation feature sizes. Introduced in fiscal 2002, the NanoSEM™The Applied NanoSEMTM 3D Metrology system extends CD-SEM technology beyond the measurement of critical dimensions to enable the three-dimensional imaging of chip featuresstructures to more precisely control theirthe lithography and etchetching processes.

DR-SEMs review defects on the wafer (i.e.,(such as, particles, scratches or residues) that are first located by othera defect detection systemssystem and then classify the defects to identify their source. Applied'sThe high-throughput, fully automatic SEMVision™Applied SEMVisionTM G2 DR-SEMDefect Analysis system enables customers to use itsthis technology as an integral part of their production lines to analyze defects as small as 80nm.50nm with high productivity.

Wafer Inspection
In fiscal 2003, Applied acquired Boxer Cross, Inc. and added the Applied BX-10 Implant/ Anneal Metrology system to its product line. The BX-10 system measures critical process parameters that directly affect transistor performance and provides users with monitoring capability for multiple future device generations.

Wafer Inspection

Using laser-based technology, defects can be detected on patterned wafers (wafers with circuit images printed on them) as they move between processing steps. Defects may include particles, open circuit lines, shorts between lines or other problems. The Applied ComPlus-EV Inspection system, introduced the Compass™ Pro system in 2002 for detecting criticalfiscal 2003, detects defects in devices with design rules as small as 100nmof 90nm and below. TheIncorporating key advances in imaging technology, the system operatescaptures up to 50 percent more defects than the previous system with the high speed required for chipmakers'customers’ volume production lines, especially for copper-based chip manufacturing.lines.

Flat Panel Displays

Process Modules
Process modules are designed to link certain Applied equipment to provide customers with a qualified, integrated and optimized production process for building microstructures on advanced chips. Applied expects these products to save customers critical process development and facility start-up time, enabling them to bring new chip technologies to market more quickly. During fiscal 2002, Applied opened a 166,000 square foot facility in Sunnyvale, California, the Maydan Process Module Technology Center, to develop its Process Module™ products.

Flat Panel Displays
The most advanced FPDsflat panel displays (FPDs) are manufactured using technologies similar to those for making semiconductors. One difference is the vastly larger area of the substrate (panel). Compared to today'stoday’s largest wafers (300mm diameter), the panels can be up to 1535 times larger. larger in area. New generation FPD fabs are being built primarily for manufacturing large-area flat panel liquid crystal display (LCD) television screens, which is experiencing strong demand and is projected to continue growing at significant rates as consumers move to larger home entertainment systems.

Applied began developmentsupplies plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD) systems and electron beam array testers to FPD manufacturers. Applied offers a range of FPDsystems that can process technology in 1990, beginning with a CVD process.different substrate sizes to meet the industry’s requirements for ever larger substrates. In fiscal 2002, AKTresponse to the growing market for larger LCD screens, Applied introduced its latest CVDPECVD system in fiscal 2003, the AKT 15K CVD,sixth-generation AKT-25K PECVD, which addresses FPD fab requirements for substrates larger than one square meter.

Maskmaking
Mask pattern generation systems use precision lasers or electron beams to write (or pattern) each layer of a semiconductor chip's design onto a piece of chrome-coated quartz glass. Introduced in 2001, the advanced MEBES® eXara™ is an electron-beam system for leading-edge maskmaking. The latest ALTA® 4000, a laser beam system launched in 2001, provides mainstream, high-throughput production capability.

Mask Making

A new system was introduced in fiscal 2001 for etching photomasks, the Tetra™ Photomask Etch system. This product uses dry etch technology to fabricate the most advanced photomasks for 100nm and below chipmaking.

Applied also supplies an inspection system to photomask manufacturers that is used to detect defects on quartz plates, called masks. These masks     Masks are used by photolithography systems to transfer microscopic circuit designs onto wafers. Since any imperfection will be replicated on the wafer, the mask must be defect-free with perfect image fidelity. The ARIS-100i™ system is an automated, ultraviolet wavelength-based advancedprecise imaging. Applied provides systems for the writing, etching, measurement and inspection system for masks used in 130nm and below generation devices. This system features enhanced image acquisition technology, data handling capabilities and sensitivity for advanced mask designs.

Factory Management Software
Applied's WorkStream™ and FAB300™ products are designed for semiconductor and FPD manufacturers to control and optimize facility operations. FAB300 is a wafer fab management software package specifically designed to meet the requirements of a 300mm wafer production facility. It integrates a full complement of operating modules, enabling chipmakers to manage 300mm wafer movement and equipment operation in a single, fully automated, fab-wide solution.masks.

Customer Service and Support

Applied's customer service organization     Applied Global Services plays a critical role in Applied'sthe Company’s ability to continuously satisfy its customers'customers’ production requirements. Approximately 3,7003,000 trained customer engineers and process support engineers are deployed in more than a dozen countries. These engineers are usually located at or near the customers'customers’ fab sites and service over 17,50016,000 installed Applied systems.

Applied's     Applied’s line of service products offers an innovative approach to maintaining and servicing Applied equipment in customers'customers’ fabs. With the Applied Total Parts Management® (TPM) program, Applied offersthe Company

6


provides an inventory management service for the spare parts used in its equipmentApplied’s systems at customers' fab sites. Under TPM, chipmakers no longer need to own or manage inventory for their Applied systems.a customer’s fab. A second product, called the Applied Total Support Package® (TSP), is a comprehensive equipment service solution that includes parts inventory management and maintenancealong with operatingsystem cost reduction and system performance improvement targets for theirApplied’s equipment at the customer’s location. The Applied equipment. SparesSolutions™SparesSolutionsTM program is an on-line customer support applicationservice that provides a simple, fast and cost-effective way for customers to obtainstreamlines the procurement of spare parts for theirparts. The Applied systems. Launched in 2002, the Total Kit Management™ManagementTM program provides customers with a convenient, cost-effective way to manage their systems'systems’ process kit service requirements. Applied also introduced in December 2002 its new Process Excursion Control™ service that combines automated data mining software with highly evolved data collection and analysis capabilities to locate and correct customers' critical yield production issues. In addition, Applied's customer service organization refurbishes markets and sells previously used Applied systems.

Backlog

equipment.

Applied'sBacklog

     Applied’s backlog increaseddecreased from $2.7 billion at October 28, 2001 to $3.2 billion at October 27, 2002.2002 to $2.5 billion at October 26, 2003. Applied schedules production ofmanufactures its systems based on order backlog and customer commitments. Backlog includes only orders for which written authorizations have been accepted, shipment dates within 12 months have been assigned and revenue has not been recognized. In addition, backlog includes service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months. However, customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders suddenly and without notice,prior to shipment, subject to possible cancellation penalties. Backlog adjustments for fiscal 2002 included2003 totaled $553 million, which consisted of cancellations, of $473 million and currency and other adjustments of $149 million.adjustments. Due to possible customer changes in delivery schedules and cancellations of orders, Applied'sApplied’s backlog at any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any succeeding period. Delays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on Applied'sApplied’s business and results of operations.

Manufacturing, Raw Materials and Supplies

Applied's     Applied’s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembling various commercial and proprietary components into finished systems in Austin, Texas. Applied also has manufacturing operations in Santa Clara, California; Hayward, California; Hillsboro, Oregon; Horsham, England; and Rehovot, Israel. Production requires some raw materials, andincluding a wide variety of mechanical and electrical components, to be manufactured to Applied'sApplied’s specifications. Applied uses numerous vendors to supply parts, components and subassemblies (collectively, "parts")(parts) for the manufacture and support of its products. Although Applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers, this is not always possible; accordingly, some key parts may be obtained only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Applied has sought, and will continue to seek, to minimize the risk of production and service interruptions and/or shortages of key parts by: 1) selecting and qualifying alternative suppliers for key parts; 2) monitoring the financial stabilitycondition of key suppliers; and 3) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts.parts; and 4) qualifying parts on a timely basis.

Research, Development and Engineering

Applied's     Applied’s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new manufacturing products. Applied'sApplied’s significant investment in research, development and engineering (RD&E) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand, thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle. Applied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements. EngineeringProduct development and engineering organizations are primarily located in the United States, as well as in the United Kingdom Israel and Japan,Israel, with process support and customer demonstration laboratories in the United States, the United Kingdom Israel, Japan and Taiwan.Israel.

Applied invested $1.1 billion (11.6 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2000, $1.2 billion (16.3(16 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2001, and $1.1 billion (20.8(21 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2002 and $921 million (21 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2003, in RD&E for product development and engineering programs to create new product lines and improve existing technologies. Applied has spent an average of 15.316 percent of net sales on RD&E over the last five years. In addition to RD&E for specific product technologies, Applied maintains ongoing programs in software, automation control systems, materials research and environmental control that have applications to its products. Key activities duringIn fiscal 2002 included development of wafer fabrication equipment2003, Applied focused on developing systems for smallercustomers’ new chip feature sizes, copper-based devicesdesigns, including systems to enable faster and 300mm wafers.denser transistor and interconnect structures with 65nm and below linewidths.

Marketing and Sales

Because of the highly technical nature of its products, Applied markets and sells its products worldwide through a direct sales force. For fiscal 2002,2003, net sales to customers in each region as a percentage of Applied'sApplied’s total net sales were: North America (primarily the United States) 26 percent, Taiwan 24Japan 18 percent, JapanEurope

7


16 percent, Korea 15 percent, EuropeTaiwan 13 percent and Asia-Pacific (including China) 13 percent and Korea nine12 percent. Applied'sApplied’s business is usually not seasonal in nature, but it is cyclical based on the capital equipment investment patterns of major semiconductor manufacturers. These expenditure patterns are based on many factors, including anticipated market demand for integrated circuits, the development of new technologies and global and regional economic conditions.

     During fiscal 2003, more than 70 percent of Applied’s net sales were to regions outside the United States of America. Managing Applied’s global operations presents challenges and involves uncertainties that may affect Applied’s business, financial condition and results of operations. For further discussion, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Trends, Risks and Uncertainties — Applied is Exposed to the Risks of Operating a Global Business.”

Information on net sales to unaffiliated customers and long-lived assets attributable to Applied'sApplied’s geographic regions is included in Note 1110 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. No individual customerNet sales to Intel Corporation represented 12 percent of Applied’s fiscal 2001 net sales, and 10 percent of Applied’s fiscal 2002 net sales. During fiscal 2003, two customers individually accounted for moregreater than 10 percent of Applied'snet sales: net sales for fiscal 2000.to Intel Corporation accounted for 12.2represented 13 percent of Applied'sApplied’s net sales, for fiscal 2001 and 10.1net sales to Samsung America, Inc. represented 12 percent of Applied'sApplied’s net sales for fiscal 2002.

Competition

sales.

Competition

The global semiconductor equipment industry is highly competitive and is characterized by increasingly rapid technological advancements and demanding worldwide service requirements. Applied'sApplied’s ability to compete depends on its ability to commercialize its technology and continually improve its products, processes and services, as well as its ability to develop new products that meet constantly evolving customer requirements. Significant competitive factors for succeeding in the semiconductor manufacturing equipment market include the equipment'sequipment’s technical capability, productivity and cost-effectiveness, overall reliability, ease of use and maintenance, contamination and defect control, and the level of technical service and support provided by the vendor. The importance of each of these factors varies depending on the specific customer'scustomer’s needs and criteria, including considerations such as the customer'scustomer’s process application, product requirements, timing of the purchase and particular circumstances of the purchasing decision. The pace of technological change is rapid, with customers continually moving to smaller critical dimensions and larger wafer sizes and adopting new materials for use in semiconductor manufacturing. Sometimes, existingfabricating the chip. Existing technology can be adapted to the new requirements; however, these requirements sometimes create the need for an entirely newdifferent technical approach. The rapid pace of technological change continually creates opportunities for existing competitors and start-ups,startups, and can quickly diminish the value of existing technologies.

Substantial competition exists for each of Applied'sApplied’s products. Competitors range from small companies that compete with a single innovative product and/or in a single region to global companies with a large and diverse linemultiple lines of semiconductor processing products. Competitors in a given technology tend to have different degrees of market presence in the various regional markets. Management believes that Applied is a strong competitor and that its competitive position is based on the ability of its products and services to continue to address customer requirements. Success for Applied will require a continued high level of investment in RD&E and in sales, marketing and customer support activities.

Patents and Licenses

Management believes that Applied'sApplied’s competitive position is significantly dependent upon skills in engineering, manufacturing and marketing, and not just on its patent position. However, protection of Applied's technologyApplied’s technological assets by obtaining and enforcing patents is important. Therefore, Applied has a programpractice to file patent applications in the U.S. and other countries for inventions that Applied considers significant. Applied has a number of patents in the U.S. and other countries, and additional applications are pending for new developments in its equipment and processes. Applied does not consider its business materially dependent upon any one patent, although taken as a whole, the rights of Applied and the products made and sold under its patents are a significant element of Applied'sApplied’s business. In addition to patents, Applied also possesses other proprietary intellectual property, including trademarks, know-how,knowhow, trade secrets and copyrights.

Applied enters into patent and technology licensing agreements with other companies when management determines that it is in its best interest to do so. Applied pays royalties under existing patent license agreements for the use, in several of its products, of certain patented technologies that are licensed to Applied for the life of the patents. Applied also receives royalties from licenses granted to third parties. Royalties received from and paid to third parties have not been and are not expected to be material.

8


In the normal course of business, Applied from time to timeperiodically receives and makes inquiries regarding possible patent infringement. In dealing with such inquiries, it may become necessary or useful for Applied to obtain or grant licenses or other rights. However, there can be no assurance that such licenses or rights will be available to Applied on commercially reasonable terms. If Applied is not able to resolve a claim, negotiate a settlement of the matter, obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms and/or successfully prosecute or defend its position, Applied'sApplied’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Environmental Matters

Two of Applied'sApplied’s locations have been designated as environmental cleanup sites. In 1987, the United States Environmental Protection Agency designated one of the locations, in Santa Clara, California, as a Superfund site and named Applied as a "Responsible“Responsible Party." Cleanup activities have been underway since 1984.at this site began in 1984 and were substantially completed in February 2002. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board has designated Applied as a "Discharger"“Discharger” with respect to the other site in Sunnyvale, California. Applied was named a Discharger at the Sunnyvale site becausein 1997 as it currently owns the site in question, althoughquestion; however, prior owners and operators are being required to performresponsible for performing cleanup and monitoring activities. Applied maintains a number of environmental, health and safety programs that are primarily preventive in nature. Neither compliance with federal, state and local provisions regulating discharge of materials into the environment, nor remedial agreements or other actions relating to the environment, has had, or is expected to have, a material effect on Applied'sApplied’s capital expenditures, competitive position, financial condition or results of operations.

Employees

The most recent report on Applied’s environmental, health and safety activities can be found on the Company’s web site athttp://www.appliedmaterials.com/about/ environment.html. This report will be updated in the future. This website address is intended to be an inactive textual reference only; none of the information contained on Applied’s website is part of this report or is incorporated by reference herein.

Employees

None of Applied'sApplied’s employees are represented by a trade union, and management considers its relations with employees to be good. In the high-technology industry, competition for highly-skilled employees is intense. Applied believes that its future success is highly dependent upon on its continued ability to attract and retain qualified employees. There can be no assurance that Applied will be able to attract, hire, assimilate and retain a sufficient number of qualified people. At October 27, 2002,26, 2003, Applied employed 16,07712,050 regular employees. On November 4, 2002, Applied announced a headcount reduction of approximately 1,750 positions, or 11 percent of its global workforce, in response to the continuing downturn in the semiconductor industry.

Available Information

Applied's Web siteApplied’s website ishttp://www.appliedmaterials.com.www.appliedmaterials.com. Applied makes available free of charge, on or through its Web site,website, its annual, quarterly and current reports, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). InformationThis website address is intended to be an inactive textual reference only; none of the information contained on Applied's Web siteApplied’s website is not part of this report.report or is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 2:Properties

     

Item 2: Properties

Information concerning Applied'sApplied’s principal properties at October 27, 200226, 2003 is set forth below:


                                                                   Square        Owner-
       Location             Type             Principal Use         Footage        ship
- ---------------------- --------------  ------------------------- --------------- -------

 Santa Clara, CA....   Office, plant   Headquarters, Marketing,   1,465,000      Owned
                       & Warehouse     Manufacturing,             2,457,000  (1) Leased
                                       Distribution,
                                       Research and Engineering

 Austin, TX.........   Office, plant   Manufacturing              1,696,000      Owned
                       & Warehouse                                  523,000      Leased

 Rehovot, Israel....   Office, plant   Manufacturing, Research      385,000      Owned
                       & Warehouse     and Engineering

 Hsinchu, Taiwan....   Office, plant   Research and Engineering,     81,000      Owned
                       & Warehouse     Customer Support             290,000      Leased

 Hayward, CA........   Office, plant   Manufacturing, Research      360,000      Leased
                       & Warehouse     and Engineering

 Narita, Japan......   Office, plant   Research and Engineering,    227,000  (2) Owned
                       & Warehouse     Customer Support

 Singapore..........   Office & plant  Customer Support             200,000      Owned

 Hillsboro, OR......   Office, plant   Manufacturing, Research      177,000      Leased
                       & Warehouse     and Engineering

 Tainan, Taiwan.....   Office, plant   Customer Support             148,000      Owned
                       & Warehouse

 Horsham, England...   Office, plant   Manufacturing, Research      127,000      Leased
                       & Warehouse     and Engineering

 Chunan, Korea......   Office, plant   Customer Support             114,000      Owned
                       & Warehouse
- ----------------------
(1) Includes approximately 459,000 square feet that is currently being subleased.
(2) Subject to loans of $21 million, collateralized by property and equipment with a net book value of $46 million at October 27, 2002.
             
Square
LocationTypePrincipal UseFootage(3)Ownership





Santa Clara, CA Office, Plant & Warehouse Headquarters, Marketing,  1,465,000   Owned 
    Manufacturing, Distribution,  2,185,000(1)  Leased 
    Research and Engineering        
Austin, TX Office, Plant & Warehouse Manufacturing  1,696,000   Owned 
       532,000   Leased 
Rehovot, Israel Office, Plant & Warehouse Manufacturing, Research  434,000   Owned 
    and Engineering        
Hayward, CA Office, Plant & Warehouse Research and Engineering  342,000   Leased 
Narita, Japan Office & Warehouse Customer Support  227,000(2)  Owned 
Hsinchu, Taiwan Office & Warehouse Customer Support  81,000   Owned 
       133,000   Leased 
Singapore Office Customer Support  200,000   Owned 

9


Square
LocationTypePrincipal UseFootage(3)Ownership





Hillsboro, OROffice, Plant & WarehouseManufacturing, Research177,000Owned
and Engineering
Tainan, TaiwanOffice & WarehouseCustomer Support148,000Owned
Horsham, EnglandOffice, Plant & WarehouseManufacturing, Research125,000Leased
and Engineering
Chunan, KoreaOffice & WarehouseCustomer Support112,000Owned
Pudong, ChinaOffice & WarehouseCustomer Support102,000Leased


(1) Includes approximately 220,000 square feet that were being subleased.
(2) Subject to loans of $19 million, collateralized by property and equipment with a net book value of $46 million at October 26, 2003.
(3) Approximately 1.4 million square feet were available for sublease.

In addition to the above properties, Applied leases office space for sales and customer support offices in 9786 locations throughout the world: 3226 in North America (primarily(principally the United States), twofour in Taiwan, 2721 in Japan, 20 in Europe, eightseven in Korea and eight in Asia-Pacific (including China).

At October 27, 2002, the following facilities have not yet been completed and placed in service: 1) 380,000 square feet in Austin, Texas; 2) 280,000 square feet in Danvers, Massachusetts; and 3) buildable land that can accommodate up to 855,000 square feet in Santa Clara, California.

In addition, Applied owns: 1) 96 acres of buildable land in Texas that can accommodate approximately 1,464,000 square feet of additional building space; 2) 26 acres in Oregon that can accommodate approximately 396,000 square feet of additional building space; 3) 1343 acres in California that can accommodate approximately 392,0001,247,000 square feet of additional building space; and 4) nine acres in Japan that can accommodate approximately 766,000 square feet of additional building space. Applied also leases: 1) 13 acres in Taiwan that can accommodate approximately 271,000 square feet of additional building space; and 2) 10 acres in Israel that can accommodate approximately 159,000111,000 square feet of additional building space. This additional building space is intendedanticipated to satisfy Applied's current andApplied’s future needs.

Applied is productively utilizing substantially all of the aboveowned facilities, and considers the above facilities suitable and adequate to meet its requirements.

Item 3:Legal Proceedings

Novellus

     

Item 3: Legal Proceedings

Novellus
AfterOn June 13, 1997, after Varian Associates, Inc. (Varian) failed to respond to requests by Applied to discuss certain patent issues, on June 13, 1997, Applied filed a lawsuit against Varian captioned Applied Materials, Inc. v. Varian Associates, Inc. (case no. C-97-20523-RMW) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging infringement of several of Applied'sApplied’s patents concerning PVD technology. On July 7, 1997, Applied amended that action to allege infringement of those same Applied PVD patents against Novellus Systems, Inc. (Novellus) and to add Novellus as a defendant, as a result of Novellus'Novellus’ acquisition of Varian'sVarian’s thin film systems PVD business. On June 23, 1997, Novellus filed a separate lawsuit against Applied captioned Novellus Systems, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc. (case no. C-97-20551-EAI) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging infringement by Applied of several PVD technology patents that were formerly owned by Varian. Novellus seeks damages for past infringement, a permanent injunction, treble damages for willful infringement, pre-judgment interest and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. In September 2000, Applied and Varian settled their disputes and on October 3, 2000, Applied'sApplied released all claims against Varian and Varian's claims and counterclaims against Applied were dismissed with prejudice with respect to the Inova system as it was made and sold as of May 7, 1997. On October 3, 2000, Applied’s claims against Varian and Varian’s claims and counterclaims against Applied were dismissed with prejudice. The litigation with Novellus continues. Fact discoveryDiscovery has closed in the actions. The court has rescheduled the previously set a trial date offrom January 20, 2004 to May 27, 2003.24, 2004. Applied believes the May trial will involve only infringement and validity issues regarding Novellus’ patent claims against Applied and Applied’s declaratory judgment claims against Novellus’ patents. Applied believes it has meritorious claims and defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.

Plasma Physics
On April 17, 2000, Applied filed a lawsuit against Plasma Physics Corp. (PPC) and Solar Physics Corp. (SPC) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, captioned Applied Materials, Inc. v. Plasma Physics Corp., Solar Physics Corp. and John Coleman (case no. 00-2199(LDW)). The lawsuit sought a judicial declaration that Applied's CVD equipment does not infringe two patents owned by PPC and exclusively licensed to SPC and/or that those patents are invalid or unenforceable. On July 31, 2000, PPC and SPC answered the complaint and filed a conditional counterclaim alleging that Applied had contributed to or induced others to infringe the two patents. PPC and SPC sought an injunction prohibiting infringement by Applied and an award of costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. The counterclaim was conditional because PPC and SPC stated that they would not sue Applied for infringement of the two patents if the Court dismisses the lawsuit initiated by Applied for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court subsequently denied without prejudice PPC's and SPC's motion to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but stated that PPC and SPC could renew the motion to dismiss, if appropriate, after further discovery. On September 13, 2001, Applied filed an amended complaint adding two new causes of action to the existing declaratory judgment claims. The new claims alleged that PPC and SPC violated the Lanham Act and engaged in unfair competition by willfully making false or misleading statements about Applied's equipment. On April 30, 2002, the parties settled the case and the Court dismissed with prejudice the claims that were brought in the litigation and any claim or counterclaim that could have been brought in the litigation.

U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
In September 2000, Applied received notice from the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, that it had begun an investigation into Applied's licensing of technology. On February 25, 2002, the Department of Justice notified Applied that the investigation has been closed.

Axcelis Technologies

On January 8, 2001, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (Axcelis), formerly a subsidiary of Eaton Corporation, filed a lawsuit against Applied in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, captioned Axcelis Technologies, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc. (case no. 01-10029 DPW). The lawsuit alleges that

10


Applied infringes a patent concerning ion implantation owned by Axcelis. The complaint also alleges various Massachusetts state and common law tortious interference and unfair competition claims. Axcelis seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction, damages, costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. On April 12, 2001, Applied answered the complaint by denying all allegations and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity and non- infringement,non-infringement, and violations of various unfair and deceptive trade practices laws. Applied seeks damages, a permanent injunction, costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. FactOn July 2, 2003, a jury ruled in favor of Applied, returning a verdict that Applied’s SwiftTM ion implantation system does not infringe Axcelis’ patent. The court has entered judgment in favor of Applied on Axcelis’ patent claim. Axcelis has filed a notice of appeal and expert discoverythe appeal is proceeding. The state law claims have closed. On December 10, 2002, the Court issued a ruling interpreting the claims of the patent. Summary judgment motions havenot yet been filed and are pending before the Court. No trial date has been set.resolved. Applied believes it has meritorious defenses and counterclaims to the action and intends to pursue them vigorously.

Linear Technology

On March 2, 2001, Linear Technology Corp. (LTC) filed a third party complaint against Applied in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, captioned Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc. (case no. 2-01-CV4 (DF)). The complaint against Applied alleged that Applied is obligated to indemnify LTC and defend LTC for certain claims in the underlying patent infringement lawsuit brought by Texas Instruments, Inc. (TI) against LTC. The complaint also alleged claims for breach of contract, breach of warranty, and various unfair business practices. In the complaint, LTC alleged that, before LTC purchased certain equipment from Applied, Applied failed to disclose to LTC that TI previously had won a jury verdict against Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai) for patent infringement based on Hyundai'sHyundai’s use of certain semiconductor equipment including some Applied tools. LTC'sLTC’s Texas lawsuit against Applied sought indemnification and damages from Applied and an order requiring Applied to defend LTC in the underlying lawsuit with TI. On January 15, 2002, the Courtcourt granted TI'sTI’s motion to sever Applied and the other third party defendants from the action and dismissed LTC'sLTC’s action against Applied and the other third party defendants without prejudice. On March 12, 2002, LTC filed a complaint against Applied in the Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara, captioned Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc., Novellus Systems, Inc. and Tokyo Electron Ltd., (case no. CV806004) alleging claims for breach of contract, fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, suppression of fact, unfair competition, breach of warranty, express contractual indemnity, implied equitable indemnity and declaratory relief. On November 12, 2002, LTC filed an amended complaint in the Santa Clara action asserting essentially the same claims as in the original complaint but adding an additional assertion that LTC and TI have settled their litigation. In the amended compliant,complaint, LTC seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief and restitution. LTC also seeks costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees including costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees for the TI litigation. Applied’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint was granted in part. LTC filed a Second Amended Complaint and Applied’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint was also granted. LTC has also asserted similarfiled a Third Amended Complaint alleging claims against certain other semiconductor equipment manufacturers.for fraud and deceit by suppression of material fact and violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code 17200. Applied has answered the complaint by denying all allegations. No trial date has been set.filed a motion to dismiss that complaint. Applied believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.

Semitool

On June 11, 2001, Semitool, Inc. (Semitool) filed a lawsuit against Applied in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, captioned Semitool, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc. (case no. CV-01-2277 CRB). The lawsuit alleged that Applied infringed a patent concerning seed repair and electroplating owned by Semitool. Semitool sought a preliminary and permanent injunction, damages, costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. On July 12, 2001, before Applied had answered the complaint, Semitool voluntarily dismissed its action against Applied in the Northern District of California. On the same day, Semitool filed a substantially identical action against Applied in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon captioned Semitool, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc. (case no. CV'01-1066CV’01-1066 AS). On July 13, 2001, Applied filed a declaratory judgment action against Semitool in the Northern District of California captioned Applied Materials, Inc. v. Semitool, Inc. (case no. CV-01-2673 BZ). In that action, Applied seekssought a declaration that Applied hashad not infringed the Semitool patent and that Semitool'sSemitool’s patent is invalid and unenforceable. Applied also seekssought costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. The California Court has ordered Applied'stransferred Applied’s action against Semitool transferred to the District of Oregon. The actions are proceeding together in Oregon. Semitool has also asserted similar claims against certain other semiconductor equipment manufacturers. Discovery is ongoing. The Oregon Court has issued an order interpreting the patent claims and has rescheduled thescheduled a trial date from June 30, 2003 toof February 3, 2004. Applied believes it has meritorious claims and defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.

11


David Scharf

On July 31, 2001, David Scharf, an individual, filed a lawsuit against Applied in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, captioned David Scharf v. Applied Materials, Inc. (case no. 01-06580 AHM). The lawsuit alleges that Applied has infringed, has induced others to infringe and has contributed to others'others’ infringement of a patent concerning color synthesizing scanning electron microscope technology. Mr. Scharf seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction, damages and costs. Applied has answered the complaint and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity. On May 10, 2002, Mr. Scharf filed a request for re-examination of his own patent.patent with the Patent and Trademark Office. On June 26, 2002, the case was removed from the Court'sCourt’s active docket after the parties stipulated to stay the case pending the results of that re-examination. On July 11, 2002, Applied filed its own request for re-examination of Mr. Scharf'sScharf’s patent with the Patent and Trademark Office, whichOffice. Applied’s request for re-examination was granted on September 19, 2002. Applied believes it has meritorious defenses and counterclaims and intends to pursue them vigorously.

ASMI

On August 27, 2002, ASM America, Inc. and ASM International, N.V. (collectively "ASMI")ASMI) filed a lawsuit against Applied in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, captioned ASM America, Inc. and ASM International, N.V. v. Applied Materials, Inc. (case no. Civ'02Civ’02 1660 PHX SMM). The lawsuit seekssought a judicial declaration that ASMI does not infringe six patents belonging to Applied that relate to remote cleaning of CVD chambers and to deposition of silicon nitride. The suit also seekssought a judicial declaration that two of thosethe six patents are invalid. On December 16, 2002, Applied responded to the complaint by denying the allegations and counterclaimed by seeking a declaratory judgment of infringement and validity of two of the patents related to remote cleaning of CVD chambers. Applied seeks damages, a preliminary and permanent injunction, costs and attorneys' fees. Applied also moved to dismiss the complaint with respect to four of the patents and moved for a more definitive statement with respect to two of ASMI'sASMI’s causes of action. On September 29, 2003, the court granted Applied’s motion for a more definitive statement. ASMI filed an amended complaint on October 31, 2003. The amended lawsuit seeks a judicial declaration that ASMI does not infringe the six patents and that the six patents are invalid. On December 15, 2003, Applied answered the amended complaint by denying the allegations and counterclaiming for infringement of the six patents. Applied seeks damages, a preliminary and permanent injunction, costs and attorney’s fees. No trial date has been set. Applied believes it has meritorious defenses and counterclaims and intends to pursue them vigorously.

     On October 3, 2003, ASMI filed a lawsuit against Applied in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, captioned ASM America, Inc. and ASM International, N.V. v. Applied Materials, Inc. (case no. 2 03CV 348 TJW). The lawsuit alleges infringement of six ASMI patents and seeks damages for past infringement, enhanced damages, attorneys’ fees, and injunctive relief. Applied responded to the complaint by denying the allegations and counterclaiming for a declaratory judgment of invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement of the patents. Applied also has asserted that ASMI is infringing seven Applied patents, including the six patents at issue in the Arizona action plus an additional patent. Applied seeks injunctive relief, compensatory and enhanced damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. Applied has filed a motion to transfer the case from the Eastern District of Texas to the District of Arizona. Applied believes it has meritorious defenses and counterclaims and intends to pursue them vigorously.

Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc.

     On September 13, 2002, Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association asserting that Applied has breached a patent license agreement between Varian and Applied dated January 1, 1992. Varian seeks to recover royalties, interest and attorneys’ fees. The arbitration hearing on whether the products are covered by the license agreement has concluded. On May 2, 2003, the arbitration panel issued an interim decision finding that some, but not all, of the products at issue were subject to the agreement. The arbitration panel next will consider whether the asserted claims of the patents under which those products were found to be covered are valid. Applied believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.

Robert Bosch GmbH

On October 10, 2002, Robert Bosch GmbH (Bosch), a German company, filed a lawsuit against Applied in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Robert Bosch GmbH v. Applied Materials, Inc. (civil action no. 02-1523). The lawsuit allegesalleged that Applied infringesinfringed two patents owned by Bosch related to anisotrophicanisotropic etching. Bosch seekssought a preliminary and permanent injunction, damages, costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. Applied has not been served withanswered the complaint and has therefore not answered. No trial date has been set. Applied believes it has meritorious defensescounterclaimed for declaratory judgment of non-

12


infringement and intends to pursue them vigorously.invalidity. The parties have settled the litigation and on November 4, 2003, all claims and counterclaims were dismissed with prejudice.

From time to time, Applied receives notification from customers claiming that such customers are entitled to indemnification or other obligations from Applied related to infringement claims made against the customers by third parties. In addition, Applied is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, Applied does not believe that any of these other existing legal matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4:Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     

None.

Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders in the Fourth Fiscal Quarter of 2002

None.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The following table and notes set forth information about Applied's fiveApplied’s four executive officers:



   Name of Individual                   Capacities in which Served
- ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------

  James C. Morgan(1)....  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  Dan Maydan(2).........  President and Director

  Joseph R. Bronson(3)..  Executive Vice President, Global Executive Committee
                          and Chief Financial Officer

  Sasson Somekh(4)......  Executive Vice President, Chairman, Global Executive Committee

  David N.K. Wang(5)....  Executive Vice President, Global Executive Committee
- ------------
Name of IndividualCapacities in which Served


James C. Morgan(1)Chairman of the Board of Directors
Michael R. Splinter(2)President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Joseph R. Bronson(3)Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Franz Janker(4)Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing

(1) Mr. Morgan, age 64, has been Chief Executive Officer since 1977 and Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1987. Mr. Morgan also served as President from 1976 to 1987.

(2) Dr. Maydan, age 67, was appointed President in December 1993 and has been a member of the Board of Directors since 1992. Dr. Maydan served as Executive Vice President from 1990 to December 1993. Prior to that, Dr. Maydan had been Group Vice President since February 1989. Dr. Maydan joined Applied in 1980 as Director of Technology.


(3) Mr. Bronson, age 54, was appointed Executive Vice President in December 2000 and to the Global Executive Committee, which took the place of the Office of the President in October 2002, and has been Chief Financial Officer since January 1998. Mr. Bronson also served in the Office of the President from January 1998 to October 2002, as Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from 1998 to 2000 and Group Vice President from 1994 to 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Bronson had been Vice President since November 1990. Mr. Bronson joined Applied in 1984 as Corporate Controller.
(1) Mr. Morgan, age 65, has been Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1987. Mr. Morgan served as Chief Executive Officer from 1977 to April 2003. Mr. Morgan also served as President from 1976 to 1987.
(2) Mr. Splinter, age 53, was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Applied Materials on April 30, 2003. Prior to joining Applied Materials, Mr. Splinter worked for nearly 20 years at Intel Corporation. Most recently he was Executive Vice President and Director of the Sales and Marketing Group at Intel Corporation, responsible for sales and operations worldwide. Mr. Splinter previously held various executive positions at Intel Corporation, including Executive Vice President and General Manager of the Technology and Manufacturing Group.
(3) Mr. Bronson, age 55, was appointed Executive Vice President in December 2000 and has been Chief Financial Officer since January 1998. Mr. Bronson also served in the Office of the President from January 1998 to October 2002, as Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from 1998 to 2000 and Group Vice President from 1994 to 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Bronson had been Vice President since November 1990. Mr. Bronson joined Applied in 1984.
(4) Mr. Janker, age 54, has been Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing since May 2003. Prior to that, he was appointed to Senior Vice President of Global Operations and Corporate Marketing in December of 2002. From December 1998 to 2002, he was Group Vice President of Corporate Marketing and Business Management. From 1982 to 1998, Mr. Janker served in a variety of sales and marketing management positions in the United States and in Europe.

(4) Dr. Somekh, age 56, was appointed Executive Vice President in December 2000 and Chairman, Global Executive Committee, which took the place of the Office of the President in October 2002. Dr. Somekh served in the Office of the President from January 1998 to October 2002, as Senior Vice President from 1993 to 2000 and Group Vice President from 1990 to 1993. Prior to that, Dr. Somekh had been a divisional Vice President. Dr. Somekh joined Applied in 1980 as a Project Manager.13

(5) Dr. Wang, age 56, was appointed Executive Vice President in December 2000 and to the Global Executive Committee, which took the place of the Office of the President in October 2002. Dr. Wang served in the Office of the President from January 1998 to October 2002, as Senior Vice President from 1993 to 2000 and Group Vice President from 1990 to 1993. Prior to that, Dr. Wang had been a divisional Vice President. Dr. Wang joined Applied in 1980 as Manager, Process Engineering and Applications.


PART II

Item 5:Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

     

PART II

Item 5: Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices as reported on the Nasdaq National Market, as adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend, effective April 16, 2002.



Fiscal year ended                   2001               2002
- ---------------------------  -----------------  -----------------
                               High     Low       High     Low
- ---------------------------  -------- --------  -------- --------

First quarter.............    $26.56   $17.69    $23.34   $16.63
Second quarter............    $29.37   $18.91    $27.76   $20.66
Third quarter.............    $28.76   $20.98    $27.31   $14.23
Fourth quarter............    $25.00   $13.75    $16.17   $10.35
- ---------------------------  -------- --------  -------- --------
                 
20022003


Fiscal yearHighLowHighLow





First quarter $23.34  $16.63  $17.49  $13.03 
Second quarter $27.76  $20.66  $15.81  $11.60 
Third quarter $27.31  $14.23  $19.30  $13.66 
Fourth quarter $16.17  $10.35  $22.22  $17.88 

Applied's     Applied’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Stock Market under the symbol AMAT. As of December 20, 2002,26, 2003, there were approximately 6,9776,995 directly registered holders of record of the common stock.

To date, Applied has not declared or paid cash dividends to its stockholders. Applied has no plans to declare and pay cash dividends.

Item 6:Selected Financial Data
                      
Fiscal year ended(1)1999(2)2000(2)200120022003






(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net sales $5,096,302  $9,564,412  $7,343,248  $5,062,312  $4,477,291 
Gross margin $2,419,219  $4,855,728  $3,252,033  $2,056,661  $1,604,455 
 (% of net sales)  47.5   50.8   44.3   40.6   35.8 
Research, development and engineering $740,114  $1,107,922  $1,198,799  $1,052,269  $920,618 
 (% of net sales)  14.5   11.6   16.3   20.8   20.6 
Marketing, selling, general and administrative $695,296  $960,753  $901,924  $708,955  $625,865 
 (% of net sales)  13.6   10.0   12.3   14.0   14.0 
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in net income/(loss) of joint venture and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $1,023,344  $2,947,844  $1,103,802  $340,511  $(211,556)
Effective tax rate (%)  32.3   30.0   29.8   21.0   29.5 
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $726,679  $2,063,552  $775,228  $269,004  $(149,147)
 (% of net sales)  14.3   21.6   10.6   5.3   (3.3)
Discontinued operations(4) $20,996  $  $  $  $ 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax(2) $  $  $(267,399) $  $ 
Net income/(loss) $747,675  $2,063,552  $507,829  $269,004  $(149,147)

14


                      
Fiscal year ended(1)1999(2)2000(2)200120022003






(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Earnings/(loss) per share(3):                    
 Continuing operations $0.44  $1.20  $0.46  $0.16  $(0.09)
 Discontinued operations(4)  0.01             
 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle        (0.16)      
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Total $0.45  $1.20  $0.30  $0.16  $(0.09)
   
   
   
   
   
 
Weighted average common shares and equivalents(3) (in thousands)  1,641,160   1,718,338   1,694,658   1,701,557   1,659,557 
Order backlog $1,739,270  $4,381,768  $2,725,406  $3,190,459  $2,495,115 
Working capital $3,579,223  $6,079,436  $6,249,358  $6,571,337  $6,729,896 
Current ratio  3.1   3.2   5.1   5.4   5.1 
Long-term debt $584,357  $573,126  $564,805  $573,853  $456,422 
Stockholders’ equity $4,575,258  $7,104,348  $7,606,737  $8,019,649  $8,068,034 
Book value per share(3) $2.88  $4.37  $4.66  $4.87  $4.81 
Total assets $7,014,510  $10,545,730  $9,828,510  $10,224,765  $10,311,622 
Capital expenditures, net of retirements $219,657  $383,255  $710,620  $417,080  $211,959 
Regular employees  13,831   19,220   17,365   16,077   12,050 


(1) Each fiscal year ended on the last Sunday in October.
(2) Effective the first fiscal quarter of 2001, Applied implemented the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” For periods prior to fiscal 2001, data was not available to provide pro forma information as if the change in accounting principle were applied retroactively. For further details, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3) Amounts prior to fiscal 2002 have been restated to reflect a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend, effective April 16, 2002.
(4) Discontinued operations in 1999 consisted of a reversal of provision for discontinuance of joint venture subsequently retained.

Item 7:Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

     

Item 6: Selected Financial Data


Fiscal year ended(1)                           1998(2)     1999(2)     2000(2)Applied develops, manufactures, markets and services integrated circuit fabrication equipment for the worldwide semiconductor industry. Demand for Applied’s products can change significantly from period to period as a result of numerous factors, including, but not limited to, changes in: 1) global economic conditions; 2) advanced technology and/or capacity requirements of semiconductor manufacturers; 3) the profitability of semiconductor manufacturers; 4) supply and demand for semiconductors; and 5) relative competitiveness of Applied’s products and services. For this and other reasons, Applied’s results of operations for fiscal 2001, 2002 - ------------------------------------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Net sales..................................$4,330,014  $5,096,302   $9,564,412   $7,343,248   $5,062,312
Gross margin...............................$2,016,313  $2,419,219   $4,855,728   $3,252,033   $2,056,661
    (%and 2003 may not necessarily be indicative of net sales).......................      46.6        47.5         50.8         44.3         40.6
Research, development and engineering......  $697,291    $740,114   $1,107,922   $1,198,799   $1,052,269
    (% of net sales).......................      16.1        14.5         11.6         16.3         20.8
Marketing, selling, general and
    administrative.........................  $626,311    $695,296     $960,753     $901,924     $708,955
    (% of net sales).......................      14.5        13.6         10.0         12.3         14.0
Income from continuing operations before
    income taxes, equity in net
    income/(loss) of joint venture and
    cumulative effect of change
    in accounting principle................  $508,693  $1,023,344   $2,947,844   $1,103,802     $340,511
Effective tax rate (%).....................      34.0        32.3         30.0         29.8         21.0
Income from continuing operations before
    cumulative effect of change
    in accounting principle(3).............  $298,665    $726,679   $2,063,552     $775,228     $269,004
    (% of net sales).......................       6.9        14.3         21.6         10.6          5.3
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
    principle, net of tax(2)...............     $  --       $  --        $  --    ($267,399)       $  --
Net income(4)..............................  $277,669    $747,675   $2,063,552     $507,829     $269,004

Earnings per diluted share(5):
    Continuing operations..................     $0.19       $0.44        $1.20        $0.46        $0.16
    Discontinued operations................     (0.01)       0.01           --           --           --
    Cumulative effect of change
       in accounting principle.............        --          --           --        (0.16)          --
                                           ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------
    Total..................................     $0.18       $0.45        $1.20        $0.30        $0.16
Weighted average common shares and
    equivalents(5) (in thousands).......... 1,573,192   1,641,160    1,718,338    1,694,658    1,701,557
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order backlog..............................$1,045,567  $1,739,270   $4,381,768   $2,725,406   $3,190,459
Working capital............................$2,595,741  $3,579,223   $6,079,436   $6,249,358   $6,571,337
Current ratio..............................       3.1         3.1          3.2          5.1          5.4
Long-term debt.............................  $616,572    $584,357     $573,126     $564,805     $573,853
Stockholders' equity.......................$3,367,290  $4,575,258   $7,104,348   $7,606,737   $8,019,649
Book value per share(5)....................     $2.20       $2.88        $4.37        $4.66        $4.87
Total assets...............................$5,288,206  $7,014,510  $10,545,730   $9,828,510  $10,224,765
Capital expenditures, net of retirements...  $464,372    $219,657     $383,255     $710,620     $417,080
Regular employees..........................    13,179      13,831       19,220       17,365       16,077
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
future operating results.

(1) Each fiscal year ended on the last Sunday in October.

(2) Effective the first fiscal quarter of 2001, Applied implemented the Securities and Exchange Commission'sSEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, (SAB 101), "Revenue“Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements." For periods prior to fiscal 2001, data was not available to provide pro forma information as if the change in accounting principle were applied retroactively. For further details, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3) Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle included net one-time items, on an after-tax basis, of: $165,093 expense for fiscal 1998 related to restructuring charges, write-down of impaired asset and acquired in-process research and development expense, offset by income from a litigation settlement; $30,248 expense for fiscal 1999 related to acquired in-process research and development expense, acquisition expenses and restructuring charges, offset by income from a litigation settlement; $9,911 income for fiscal 2000 related to income from a litigation settlement, offset by acquisition expenses; $158,871 expense for fiscal 2001 related to restructuring charges and acquired in-process research and development expense; and $67,528 expense for fiscal 2002 related to restructuring charges and acquired in-process research and development expense. For further details, see Notes 6 and 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4) In addition to the net one-time items included in income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net income also included after-tax expense of $20,996 from discontinued operations for fiscal 1998, after-tax income of $20,996 from the reversal of provision for discontinuance of joint venture subsequently retained for fiscal 1999 and after-tax expense of $267,399 from a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle related to the implementation of SAB 101 for fiscal 2001.

(5) Amounts prior to fiscal 2002 have been restated to reflect a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend, effective April 16, 2002.

Net Sales

     

Item 7: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Applied develops, manufactures, markets and services semiconductor wafer fabrication equipment for the worldwide semiconductor industry. Demand for Applied's products can change significantly from period to period as a result of numerous factors, including, but not limited to, changes in: 1) global economic conditions; 2) supply and demand for semiconductors; 3) the profitability of semiconductor manufacturers; 4) advanced technology and/or capacity requirements of semiconductor manufacturers; and 5) relative competitiveness of Applied's products and services. For this and other reasons, Applied's results of operations for fiscal 2000, 2001 and 2002 may not necessarily be indicative of future operating results.

Effective the first fiscal quarter of 2001, Applied implemented the Securities and Exchange Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements." For periods prior to fiscal 2001, data was not available to provide pro forma information as if the change in accounting principle were applied retroactively. For further details, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net Sales
Applied'sApplied’s business was subject to cyclical industry conditions in fiscal 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002.2003. As a result of these conditions, there were significant fluctuations in Applied'sApplied’s quarterly new orders and net sales, both

15


within and across fiscal years. Demand for semiconductor manufacturing equipment has historically been volatile as a result of sudden changes in semiconductor supply and demand and other factors, including rapid technological advances in both semiconductor devices and wafer fabrication processes.

Quarterly and full fiscal year financial information follows:


                                                Fiscal Quarter
                                 ---------------------------------------  Fiscal
                                   First    Second     Third    Fourth     Year
- -------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(In millions, except per share amounts)

2000(1):
  New orders..................     $2,454    $2,928    $3,275    $3,601   $12,258
  Net sales...................     $1,722    $2,190    $2,732    $2,920    $9,564
  Gross margin................       $857    $1,098    $1,392    $1,509    $4,856
  Net income(2)...............       $327      $469      $604      $664    $2,064
  Earnings per diluted share..      $0.19     $0.27     $0.35     $0.39     $1.20
- -------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
2001:
  New orders..................     $2,430    $1,353    $1,208    $1,106    $6,097
  Net sales...................     $2,363    $2,139    $1,576    $1,265    $7,343
  Gross margin................     $1,143      $985      $655      $469    $3,252
  Income/(loss) from operations
    before cumulative effect
    of change in
    accounting principle(3)...       $424      $318      $115      ($82)     $775
  Net income/(loss)(4)........       $157      $318      $115      ($82)     $508
  Earnings/(loss) per
    diluted share.............      $0.09     $0.19     $0.07    ($0.05)    $0.30
- -------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
2002:
  New orders..................     $1,119    $1,688    $1,778    $1,557    $6,142
  Net sales...................     $1,000    $1,156    $1,460    $1,446    $5,062
  Gross margin................       $386      $463      $606      $602    $2,057
  Net income/(loss)(3)........       ($45)      $52      $115      $147      $269
  Earnings/(loss) per
    diluted share.............     ($0.03)    $0.03     $0.07     $0.09     $0.16
- -------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(1) Fiscal 2000 amounts have not been restated in accordance with SAB 101, which was implemented in fiscal 2001. Data was not available to provide pro forma information as if the change in accounting principle was applied retroactively.
                      
Fiscal Quarter

Fiscal
FirstSecondThirdFourthYear





(In millions, except per share amounts)
2001:                    
 New orders $2,430  $1,353  $1,208  $1,106  $6,097 
 Net sales $2,363  $2,139  $1,576  $1,265  $7,343 
 Gross margin $1,143  $985  $655  $469  $3,252 
 Income/(loss) from operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $424  $318  $115  $(82) $775 
 Net income/(loss)(1) $157  $318  $115  $(82) $508 
 Earnings/(loss) per share $0.09  $0.19  $0.07  $(0.05) $0.30 
2002:                    
 New orders $1,119  $1,688  $1,778  $1,557  $6,142 
 Net sales $1,000  $1,156  $1,460  $1,446  $5,062 
 Gross margin $386  $463  $606  $602  $2,057 
 Net income/(loss) $(45) $52  $115  $147  $269 
 Earnings/(loss) per share $(0.03) $0.03  $0.07  $0.09  $0.16 
2003:                    
 New orders $1,016  $971  $1,054  $1,277  $4,318 
 Net sales $1,054  $1,107  $1,095  $1,221  $4,477 
 Gross margin $390  $373  $347  $494  $1,604 
 Net income/(loss) $(65) $(62) $(37) $15  $(149)
 Earnings/(loss) per share $(0.04) $(0.04) $(0.02) $0.01  $(0.09)

(2) Net income included one-time items, on an after-tax basis, of $10 million of income for the second fiscal quarter of 2000.


(3) Income/(loss) from operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle included one-time expenses, on an after-tax basis, of $41 million for the second fiscal quarter of 2001, $13 million for the third fiscal quarter of 2001 and $105 million for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001. Net income/(loss) included one-time expenses, on an after-tax basis, of $68 million for the first fiscal quarter of 2002.
(1) Net income/(loss) included an after-tax expense of $267 million from a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the first fiscal quarter of 2001.

(4) In addition to the net one-time items included in income/(loss) from operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net income/(loss) also included an after-tax expense of $267 million from a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the first fiscal quarter of 2001.16


Net sales by geographic region, which were attributed to the location of the customers’ facilities, were as follows:


Fiscal year ended        2000      2001      2002
- -------------------- --------- --------- ---------
(In millions)

North America*....     $2,598    $2,131    $1,328
Taiwan............      2,317     1,109     1,238
Japan.............      1,509     1,876       757
Europe............      1,430     1,085       660
Korea.............        868       449       443
Asia-Pacific**....        842       693       636
- -------------------- --------- --------- ---------
                       $9,564    $7,343    $5,062
- -------------------- --------- --------- ---------
             
Fiscal year200120022003




(In millions)
North America* $2,131  $1,328  $1,179 
Japan  1,876   757   827 
Europe  1,085   660   695 
Korea  449   443   666 
Taiwan  1,109   1,238   583 
Asia-Pacific**  693   636   527 
   
   
   
 
  $7,343  $5,062  $4,477 
   
   
   
 

*     Primarily the United States.
**   Includes China


In fiscal 2000, the semiconductor and semiconductor manufacturing equipment industries were in a period of expansion, and Applied achieved record levels of new orders, net sales and net income for this period. However, during
Primarily the United States.

** Includes China.

     During the first fiscal quarter of 2001, slowing worldwide demand for semiconductors resulted in a rapid decline in demand for semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Inventory buildups in telecommunication products, slower than expected personal computer sales and slower global economic growth caused semiconductor companies to reevaluatereduce their capital spending and reschedule or cancel existing orders. This decline in demand deepened sequentially throughout fiscal 2001 and the first fiscal quarter of 2002 into a severe industry downturn due to continued weakness in the macro-economic climate and consumption of electronic goods, which resulted in further capital spending cutbacks by Applied'sApplied’s customers. As a result of these factors, net sales declined 23 percent from $9.6 billion for fiscal 2000 to $7.3 billion for fiscal 2001. Also includedIncluded in fiscal 2001 net sales waswere $642 million of revenue that was recognized as part of the cumulative effect of implementing the Securities and Exchange Commission'sSEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), "Revenue“Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements."

Net sales declined 31 percent from $7.3 billion for fiscal 2001 to $5.1 billion for fiscal 2002. The decline in demand for Applied'sApplied’s products continued into the first fiscal quarter of 2002. In the second fiscal quarter of 2002, customers began to orderordered equipment for 200mm advanced capacity to satisfy demand driven by consumer-related and wireless devices. Customers ordered 200mm capacity for this demand increase in demand as their transition to 300mm equipment was not yet complete. Customers also continued to place technology orders to invest in 300mm wafer processing, copper and smaller line-width technologies. However, second quarter demand levels proved to be unsustainable as the global economic environment weakened through the middle of the year, and customers reduced their level of capacity spending accordingly while maintaining advanced technology spending. Net sales peaked in the third fiscal quarter of 2002 and flattened in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2002. Included in fiscal 2002 net sales was the remaining $9 million of revenue that was recognized as part of the cumulative effect of implementing SAB 101.

Gross Margin
Net sales declined 12 percent from $5.1 billion for fiscal 2002 to $4.5 billion for fiscal 2003. Orders declined from $1.6 billion for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2002 to $1.0 billion for the first and second fiscal quarters of 2003, reflecting the continued and prolonged downturn in the semiconductor industry. However, orders increased to $1.1 billion for the third fiscal quarter and $1.3 billion for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2003, reflecting customers’ continued investments in memory and logic and their transition to 300mm, along with the increased capacity utilization in both advanced and established technologies. Following the new order trends, net sales decreased to approximately $1.1 billion for each of the first three fiscal quarters of 2003, reflecting the impact of the prolonged industry downturns and increased to $1.2 billion for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2003, indicating the beginning of an industry recovery.

Realignment Activities

     In response to the continuing difficult business conditions, Applied implemented a series of activities to better align Applied’s cost structure with prevailing economic conditions during early fiscal 2003. Realignment activities consisted of consolidation of facilities, reductions in workforce, and refocused product efforts, such as the electron-beam mask pattern product line and implementation of the global spare parts distribution system (which included a closure of a central warehouse). As a result of the realignment activities, Applied vacated approximately two million square feet and reduced approximately 3,800 positions. Realignment activities resulted in charges across multiple categories, as incurred, including cost of products sold, research, development and engineering expenses, and restructuring and asset impairment charges, as discussed below.

17


Gross Margin

Gross margin as a percentage of net sales decreased from 50.8 percent for fiscal 2000 to 44.3 percent for fiscal 2001 and to 40.6 percent for fiscal 2002. During2002, and to 35.8 percent for fiscal 1999 and2003. In fiscal 2000, Applied experienced unprecedented new order and revenue growth. Accordingly, Applied expanded its manufacturing facilities during these periods to accommodate current and anticipated growth. The decreased business volume forin fiscal 2001, 2002 and 20022003, due to the industry downturn, was insufficient to fully absorb the overhead costs of these facilities, resulting in lower gross margins for fiscal 2001 and 2002.all respective periods. The decreasecontinued decline in fiscal 2002 gross margin for fiscal 2003 was alsoprincipally attributable to customerunder absorption of manufacturing and field service costs as a result of prolonged lower business volumes, and support activities, primarily startup costsinventory writeoffs and charges associated with a newrefocused product efforts, including an electron-beam mask pattern product and implementation of the global spare parts distribution system and excess overhead resulting from the decline in system installations.system.

Research, Development and Engineering

Research, Development and Engineering
Applied's     Applied’s future operating results depend, to a considerable extent, on its ability to maintain a competitive advantage in the products and services it provides. Applied believes that it is critical to continue to make substantial investments in RD&Eresearch, development and engineering (RD&E) to assure the availability of innovative technology that meets the current and projected requirements of its customers'customers’ most advanced chipsemiconductor designs. Applied has historically maintained its commitment to investing in RD&E especially during industry downturns, in order to continue to offer new products and technologies. As a result, RD&E expenses remained relatively flat at $1.1 billion (11.6 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2000,were $1.2 billion (16.3(16 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2001, and $1.1 billion (20.8(21 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2002. Product development2002, and $921 million (21 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2003. Development cycles range from 12 to 36 months depending on whether the tool developmentproduct is an enhancement of existing technology or a new product area.product. Most of Applied'sApplied’s existing product lines are the result of internal product development activities. In certain instances, Applied acquires technologies either in either existing areas of development or through new product opportunities to complement its existing technology capabilities and to reduce time to market for market entry and penetration. Throughout the periods covered by this report, Applied has been investing in its new Process Moduledeveloped products to provide customers with a qualified, integrated and optimized production process flow for building microstructures on advanced chips. Process modules are designed to link certain Applied equipmentenable our customers to deliver an integrated process application to the customer for wafer processing.fabricate chips with 65nm and below feature sizes and new materials such as copper and low k dielectrics.

During fiscal 2001, Applied continued its development of technologies for copper and lowk-based k-based chips and 300mm wafers, as well as focused efforts on the core technologies that willwould be required for chipmakerscustomers to begin development of 100nm and below generation devices. Areas of increased investment included maskmaking technology, metrology and inspection, ion implantation, and products for depositing and etching new materials.

In fiscal 2002, Applied invested in critical development activities to meet customers'its customers’ rapid move to sub-100nm dimensions in their most advanced designs, which are expectedwere anticipated to begin entering production in fiscal 2003. This difficult and challenging dimensional shift is matchedwas compounded by the need to provide much of the technology for both 200mm and 300mm wafers, requiring additional process and hardware development. For the sub-100nm chip generations, inspection and metrology tools have becomebecame more important to assure enhanced device performance as well as adequate manufacturing yields. Accordingly, Applied focused its RD&E resources on these technologies. In addition, development of new technologiesinnovations such as advanced wafer wet cleaning and atomic layer deposition, which deposits materials in increasingly smaller structures, addressesaddressed new market opportunities for Applied in coming years.Applied. Within virtually all of the technology areas, including fab and yield management, Applied invested in more advanced software capabilities.

Marketing, Selling, GeneralIn fiscal 2003, Applied refocused product efforts and Administrative
made investments in strategic products. Applied focused on the development of several important processing technologies to enable the production of new chips using copper and low k dielectric materials, as well as to meet the challenges of smaller, 65nm and below, feature sizes. In addition to interconnect solutions, Applied continued to invest resources in the development of systems for advanced transistor designs with smaller gate structures that enable faster signal propagation and reduced power. Applied also continued the development of its process diagnostic and control capabilities with systems to inspect and measure smaller dimensions and defects.

Marketing, Selling, General and Administrative

Marketing, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from $961 million (10.0 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2000 to $902 million (12.3(12 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2001 and to $709 million (14.0(14 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2002.2002, and to $626 million (14 percent of net sales) for fiscal 2003. The decreases forfrom fiscal 2001 to 2002 and 20022003 were due primarily to headcount reductions and cost reduction activities, limiting discretionary expenditures and to align costs to a lower business volume.volume.

Non-recurring Items
Non-recurring items for18


Restructuring, Asset Impairments and Other Charges

     The restructuring actions taken in fiscal 2000 totaled $40 million, or $0.02 per diluted share after tax, related2001, 2002 and 2003 were intended to merger expenses forbetter align Applied’s cost structure with prevailing market conditions due to the acquisitionprolonged industry downturn. These actions, which were necessary as a result of Etec.reduced business volume, reduced Applied’s global workforce and consolidated global facilities.

Non-recurring items     Restructuring, asset impairments and other charges for fiscal 2001 totaled $221 million, or $0.09 per diluted share after tax, consisting of a pre-tax charge of $10 million for acquired in-process research and development and pre-tax restructuring and asset impairment charges of $211 million. During fiscal 2001, Applied recorded pre-taxThe restructuring and asset impairment charges of $211 million consistingconsisted of $105 million for headcount reductions, $45 million for consolidation of facilities and $61 million for other costs, primarily fixed asset write-offs. These restructuring actions occurred in Applied's second, third and fourth fiscal quarters, and were takenwriteoffs due to better align Applied's cost structure with prevailing market conditions. Duringfacility consolidation. As of October 26, 2003, the second fiscal quarter of 2001, Applied completed a voluntary separation plan that resulted in a headcount reduction of approximately 1,000 employees, or three percent of its global workforce, for a cost of $47 million. During the third fiscal quarter of 2001, Applied recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $4 million associated with severance and benefit costs. During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001, Applied eliminated approximately 2,000 additional positions, or 10 percent of its global workforce, for a cost of $54 million. The majority of the affected employees were based in Santa Clara, Californiafiscal 2001 restructuring actions have been completed.

     Restructuring, asset impairments and Austin, Texas, and represented multiple company activities and functions.

Non-recurring itemsother charges for fiscal 2002 totaled $85 million, or $0.04 per diluted share after tax, consisting of a pre-tax charge of $8 million for acquired in-process research and development and a pre-tax restructuring chargeand asset impairment charges of $77 million. The pre-tax restructuring charge, which was recorded in the first fiscal quarter of 2002,and asset impairment charges consisted of $39 million for headcount reductions, $16 million for consolidation of facilities and $22 million for other costs, primarily fixed asset write-offs. This restructuring action was taken to better align Applied's cost structure with prevailing market conditionswriteoffs due to facility consolidation. As of October 26, 2003, the prolonged industry downturn, and it reduced Applied's global workforce by approximately 1,100 employees, or six percent. The majority of the affected employees were basedfiscal 2002 restructuring actions have been completed.

     Restructuring, asset impairments and other charges for fiscal 2003 totaled $372 million, consisting of $186 million for headcount reductions, $86 million for consolidation of facilities and $100 million for other costs, primarily fixed asset writeoffs due to facility consolidation. The fiscal 2003 restructuring activities are expected to be completed during early 2004, which will result in Santa Clara, California and Austin, Texas, and represented multiple company activities and functions.additional costs.

For further details, see Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Non-recurring Income
Non-recurring income of $68 million for fiscal 2000 was related to a 1998 litigation settlement with ASM International, N.V. For further details, see Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net Interest Income

Net Interest Income
Net interest income was $133 million for fiscal 2000, $174 million for fiscal 2001, and $131 million for fiscal 2002. The increase2002 and $102 million for fiscal 2001 was due primarily to higher average cash and investment balances.2003. The decrease forin net interest income in fiscal 2002 and 2003 was due primarily to lower average interest rates.

Income Taxes

Provision for Income Taxes
Applied'sApplied’s effective income tax provision/(benefit) rate was 30.0 percent for fiscal 2000, 29.8 percent for fiscal 2001, and 21.0 percent for fiscal 2002. Applied expected an effective rate of 29.52002 and (29.5) percent for fiscal 2001, which decreased from the fiscal 2000 effective rate due to a shift in the geographic composition of Applied's pre-tax income.2003. The actual effective rate for fiscal 2001 of 29.8 percent differed from the expectedanticipated effective rate of 29.5 percent due to the non-tax deductible nature of $10 million of acquired in-process research and development expense. Applied'sexpense and a shift in the geographic composition of Applied’s pre-tax income. Applied’s actual effective rate of 21.0 percent for fiscal 2002 differed from the anticipated effective rate of 29.5 percent primarily due to significant Foreign Sales Corporation and extraterritorial income tax benefits. Absentbenefits, which resulted from an increase in Foreign Sales Corporation and extraterritorial qualified income. Without these additional benefits, earnings per diluted share would have been reduced by $0.02 for fiscal 2002. Applied's2002. Applied expected and experienced an actual effective benefit rate of 29.5 percent for fiscal 2003. Applied’s future effective income tax rate depends on various factors, such as tax legislation, the geographic composition of Applied'sApplied’s pre-tax income and non-tax deductible expenses incurred in connection with acquisitions and the effectiveness of its tax planning strategies.acquisitions.

Business Combinations

Business Combinations
On November 20, 2001,April 18, 2003, Applied acquired the assets of Schlumberger's electron-beam wafer inspection business for $66 million in cash. On December 3, 2001, Applied acquired Global Knowledge Services,Boxer Cross, Inc., a providerproducer of advancedin-line monitoring systems that provide customers with critical electrical measurement data mining services to improvefor controlling semiconductor manufacturing yield and efficiency,processes, for $16$14 million in cash. On April 8, 2002, Applied acquired Electron Vision Corporation, a designer, manufacturer and seller of e-beam stabilization and curing tools for the semiconductor, thin film head and micro-fabrication industries, for $26 million in cash.

On December 3, 2001, Applied also made acquisitionsacquired Global Knowledge Services, Inc., a provider of advanced data mining services to improve semiconductor manufacturing yield and efficiency, for $16 million in fiscal 2000 and fiscal 2001.cash. On November 20, 2001, Applied acquired the assets of Schlumberger’s electron-beam wafer inspection business for $66 million in cash. On June 27, 2001, Applied acquired Oramir, a supplier of advanced laser cleaning technology for semiconductor wafer, for $21 million in cash.

     For further details, see Note 1312 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On November 4, 2002, Applied announced a headcount reduction of approximately 1,750 positions, or 11 percent of its global workforce, in response to the continuing downturn in the semiconductor industry. The majority of the affected employees were based in Santa Clara, California and Austin, Texas, and represented multiple company activities and functions. As a result of these activities, Applied will record a restructuring charge for the first fiscal quarter of 2003.19

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS


Recent Accounting Pronouncement

In August 2001,January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued StatementFASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 143, "Accounting51.” FIN 46 provides guidance on: 1) the identification of entities for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 addresseswhich control is achieved through means other than through voting rights, known as “variable interest entities” (VIEs); and 2) which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary and when it should consolidate a VIE. This new requirement for consolidation applies to entities: 1) where the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial accountinginterest; or 2) whose equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and reportingall other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. FIN 46 is effective for obligations associated withall new VIEs created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For VIEs created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the retirementprovisions of tangible long-lived assetsFIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period ending after December 15, 2003. Certain disclosures are effective immediately. Applied holds an interest in a venture fund, Applied Materials Ventures I, L.P. (Ventures I). Applied will implement FIN 46 during the first fiscal quarter of 2004 and the associated retirement costs.will consolidate Ventures I as a VIE. Applied does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 143, which will be effective for Applied's fiscal 2003,implementation to have a material effect on itsthe financial condition or results of operations.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal For additional discussion of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions." Applied does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 144, which will be effective for Applied's fiscal 2003, to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." Applied does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 145, which will become effective at varying dates from May 2002 to Applied's fiscal 2003, to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and supersedes Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Applied does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 146 to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

For further details regarding the abovethis recent accounting pronouncements,pronouncement and Ventures I, see Note 1 and Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Applied increased its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments from $4.8 billion at October 28, 2001 to $4.9 billion at October 27, 2002. Applied has generated $3.72002 to $5.5 billion of cash from operating activities during the past three years, primarily from net income and working capital management.at October 26, 2003. Applied has not undertaken any significant external financing activities for several years.

Applied generated cash from operating activities of $1.7 billion for fiscal 2000, $1.6 billion for fiscal 2001, and $492 million for fiscal 2002.2002 and $802 million for fiscal 2003. The primary sources of cash from operating activities have been net income, as adjusted to exclude the effect of non-cash charges, and changes in working capital requirements,levels, including accounts receivable and inventories. Applied utilized programs to sell accounts receivable of $1.5 billion for fiscal 2000, $1.2 billion for fiscal 2001, and $689 million for fiscal 2002.2002 and $556 million for fiscal 2003. These accounts receivable sales had the effect of increasing cash and reducing accounts receivable and days sales outstanding. Days sales outstanding was 68 days at the end of fiscal 2003, compared to 66 days at the end of fiscal 2002 compared toand 56 days at the end of fiscal 2001 and 73 days at the end2001. A portion of fiscal 2000.these sold accounts receivable is subject to certain limited recourse provisions. However, Applied has not experienced any losses under these programs, and receivables sold under these programs have terms and credit risk characteristics similar to Applied's overall receivables portfolio.programs. For further details regarding accounts receivable sales, see Note 1211 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements. Inventories were reduced by $139$323 million in fiscal 20022003 due to lower systems inventories, partially offset by an increase in customer service spares inventories to support new 300mm products shipped to customers.ongoing inventory reduction and management programs.

Applied used $1.0$1.6 billion of cash for investing activities for fiscal 2000, $1.6 billion for fiscal 2001, and $693 million for fiscal 2002.2002 and $731 million for fiscal 2003. Capital expenditures, net of retirements, were $383 million for fiscal 2000, $711 million for fiscal 2001, and $417 million for fiscal year 2002 and $212 million for fiscal 2003, totaling $1.5$1.3 billion for the past three years. Application laboratories, equipment and related facilities comprised most of the capital spending. The largest capital expenditure for the last three years was the$153 million for additional construction and fit-up of the Maydan Process Module Technology Center in Sunnyvale, California where Applied'sApplied’s demonstration laboratories for new technology applications are located. Fiscal 2002 capital expenditures also included $65 million for the purchase of properties in Santa Clara, California that were previously held under a synthetic lease. Fiscal 2003 capital expenditures also included $52 million for the purchase of facilities in Hillsboro, Oregon that were previously held under a synthetic lease. Investing activities also included purchases and sales of short-term investments and acquisitions of technology or of other companies to allow Applied to access new market segmentsopportunities or emerging technology.technologies.

Applied generated $149used $261 million of cash from financing activities for fiscal 2000, used $261 million for fiscal 2001, and generated $131 million for fiscal 2002. Net common stock activities (issuances of common stock under employee stock plans, offset by share repurchases) generated $992002 and $8 million for fiscal 2000 as a result of a significant increase in option exercises by employees, reflecting Applied's higher average stock price, partially offset by stock repurchases.2003. During fiscal 2001, net common stock activity used $169 million of cash as stock repurchases increased and stock sales to employees decreased, reflecting Applied's lower average stock price in fiscal 2001.decreased. During fiscal 2002 and 2003, net common stock activity generated $75 million and $73 million of cash due toas proceeds received from stock sales to employees and lowerexceeded the amount used for stock repurchases. Since March 1996, Applied has systematically repurchased shares of its common stock in the open market to partially fund its stock-based employee benefit and incentive plans. Financing activities also included borrowings and repayments of debt. ChangesNet changes in debt generated $50 million of cash for fiscal 2000, used $92 million of cash for fiscal 2001, and generated $56 million of cash for fiscal 2002.2002 and used $64 million of cash for fiscal 2003.

To date, Applied has not declared or paid cash dividends to its stockholders due to a number of factors, including the volatile nature of the semiconductor industry and the potential requirements to finance working capital in the event of a significant upturn in business. Applied reevaluates this practice from time to time but is not contemplating the payment of a cash dividend.20


     On March 21, 2002, Applied'sApplied’s Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split of Applied'sApplied’s common stock, which was distributed in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend on or about April 16, 2002 to stockholders of record as of April 1, 2002.

Although cash requirements will fluctuate based on the timing and extent of these factors, Applied'sApplied’s management believes that cash generated from operations, together with the liquidity provided by existing cash balances and borrowing capability, will be sufficient to satisfy Applied'sApplied’s liquidity requirements for the next 12 months. For further details regarding Applied'sApplied’s operating, investing and financing activities for each of the three years in the period ended October 27, 2002,26, 2003, see the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     During the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to certain parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either Applied or its subsidiaries. As of October 26, 2003, the maximum potential amount of future payments that Applied could be required to make under these guarantee agreements was approximately $56 million. Applied has not recorded any liability in connection with these guarantee arrangements beyond that required to appropriately account for the underlying transaction being guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under these guarantee arrangements.

     Applied also has additional guarantee arrangements on behalf of certain subsidiaries. As of October 26, 2003, Applied has not recorded any liability related to guarantees of subsidiary obligations. Applied does not expect, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable any amounts will be required to be paid under these arrangements. Subsidiary guarantees as of October 26, 2003 were associated with the following types of arrangements: short-term borrowings, term loans, overdrafts and leases. While certain subsidiaries have short-term borrowing, term loans and overdraft facilities available totaling approximately $169 million as of October 26, 2003, no amounts were outstanding as October 26, 2003. In the event of use and subsequent default of these facilities by Applied’s subsidiaries, such arrangements would be guaranteed by Applied. In addition, certain subsidiaries have lease arrangements guaranteed by Applied. These leases will expire between 2009 and 2014. In the event that the subsidiaries do not make the required payments, Applied could be required to pay the leases on behalf of the subsidiaries. As of October 26, 2003, annual lease obligations under these arrangements approximated $12 million.

     Ventures I invests in privately-held, early-stage companies engaged in developing systems, components and devices based on nanotechnology for specific applications and products. Ventures I is a limited partnership with Applied as the sole limited partner and an independent party as the general partner. Applied has committed to fund $50 million in capital contributions, but has reserved the option to discontinue capital contributions at $25 million. Applied’s capital contributions to Ventures I totaled approximately $9 million through October 27, 2002 and $16 million through October 26, 2003. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on Ventures I.

     Applied also has operating leases for various facilities. Total rental expense for operating leases was $153 million for fiscal 2001, $140 million for fiscal 2002 and $134 million for fiscal 2003.

The following table summarizes the effect on Applied'sApplied’s liquidity and cash flows from contractual obligations of debt arrangements and noncancellablenon-cancelable operating leases as of October 27, 2002:


Fiscal year ended     2003   2004   2005   2006   2007  Thereafter   Total
- -------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---------- --------
(In millions)

Debt maturities......   $9   $109    $50     $7   $202       $206     $583
Noncancellable
  operating leases...  133    110     81     38     32        115      509
- -------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---------- --------
                      $142   $219   $131    $45   $234       $321   $1,092
- -------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---------- --------
26, 2003:
                             
Fiscal year20042005200620072008ThereafterTotal








(In millions)
Debt maturities $105  $46  $2  $202  $2  $205  $562 
Non-cancelable operating leases  111   82   60   43   35   147   478 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
  $216  $128  $62  $245  $37  $352  $1,040 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIESCritical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. Certain of these significant accounting policies are considered to be critical accounting policies, as defined below.

21


A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both material to the presentation of Applied'sApplied’s financial statements and requires management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a material effect on Applied'sApplied’s financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, critical accounting estimates have the following attributes: 1) Applied is required to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate; and 2) different estimates Applied could reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on Applied'sApplied’s financial condition or results of operations.

Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty. Applied bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be applicable and reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information is obtained and as Applied'sApplied’s operating environment changes. These changes have historically been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they became known. In addition, management is periodically faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within its control and will not be known for prolonged periods of time. These uncertainties are discussed in the section below entitled "Trends,“Trends, Risks and Uncertainties." Based on a critical assessment of its accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, management believes that Applied'sApplied’s consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and presentprovide a meaningful presentation of Applied'sApplied’s financial condition and results of operations.

Management believes that the following are critical accounting policies:

Warranty Costs

Warranty Costs
Applied provides for the estimated cost of warranty when revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration experience statistics and regional warranty support costs. Applied'sApplied’s warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. As Applied'sApplied’s customer engineers and process support engineers are highly trained and deployed globally, labor availability is a significant factor in determining labor costs. The quantity and availability of critical replacement parts is another significant factor in estimating warranty costs. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from Applied'sApplied’s estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required, which could have a material adverse effect on Applied'sApplied’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Inventories

Inventories
Inventories are generally stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. The carrying value of inventory is reduced for estimated obsolescence by the difference between its cost and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand. Applied evaluates the inventory carrying value for potential excess and obsolete inventory exposures by analyzing historical and anticipated demand. In addition, inventories are evaluated for potential obsolescence due to the effect of known and anticipated engineering change orders are evaluated for potential obsolescence.and new products. If actual demand were to be substantially lower than estimated, additional inventory adjustments for excess or obsolete inventory maymight be required, which could have a material adverse effect on Applied'sApplied’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Applied reviews goodwill and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable, and also reviews goodwill annually in accordance with SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 "Goodwill(SFAS 142), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Intangible assets, such as purchased technology, are generally recorded in connection with a business acquisition. The value assigned to intangible assets is determined by an independent valuation firmusually based on estimates and judgment regarding expectations for the success and life cycle of products and technology acquired. If actual product acceptance differs significantly from the estimates, Applied may be required to record an impairment charge to write down the asset to its realizable value. In addition, SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill be tested annually using a two-step process. The first step is to identify any potential impairment by comparing the carrying value of the reporting unit to its fair value. If a potential impairment is identified, the second step is to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount to measure the impairment loss. The fair value of a reporting unit is estimated using the market multiples approach, and is dependent on market values for companies in a similar industry. A severe decline in market value could result in an unexpected impairment charge tofor impaired goodwill, which could have a material adverse effect on Applied'sApplied’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Income Taxes
22


Income Taxes

Applied accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting(SFAS 109) “Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Management has determined that it is more likely than not that its future taxable income will be sufficient to realize its deferred tax assets.

Applied provides for income taxes based upon an annual estimated effective income tax rate. The effective tax rate is highly dependent upon the geographic composition of worldwide earnings, tax regulations governing each region, non-tax deductible expenses incurred in connection with acquisitions and availability of tax credits and the effectiveness of Applied's tax planning strategies.credits. Management carefully monitors the changes in many factors and adjusts the effective income tax rate on a timely basis. If actual results differ from these estimates, Applied could be required to record a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets or adjust its effective income tax rate, which could have a material adverse effect on Applied'sApplied’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Legal Matters

TRENDS, RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

     Applied is subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. Applied evaluates, among other factors, the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and reasonably estimates the amount of the loss. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of the probability and as to whether an exposure can be reasonably estimated. When Applied determines that it is probable that a loss has been incurred, the effect is recorded promptly in the consolidated financial statements. Although the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, Applied does not believe that any of the existing legal matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. However, significant changes in legal proceedings and claims or the factors considered in the evaluation of those matters could have a material adverse effect on Applied’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The industry that Applied serves is highly volatileTrends, Risks and unpredictable.Uncertainties

The industry that Applied serves is highly volatile and unpredictable.

As a supplier to the global semiconductor industry, Applied is subject to the industry’s business cycles, that characterize the industry-the timing, length and volatility of these cycleswhich are difficult to predict. The semiconductor industry has historically been cyclical because of sudden changes in demand for semiconductors and manufacturing capacity, requirements, including capacity utilizing the latest technology. The rate of changes in demand, including end demand, is accelerating, and the effect of these changes uponon Applied is occurring sooner, exacerbating the volatility of these cycles. These changes have affected the timing and amounts of customers'customers’ capital equipment purchases and investments in new technology. These industry cycles create pressure on Applied'stechnology, and continue to affect Applied’s net sales, gross margin and net income.results of operations. In addition to affecting Applied'sApplied’s customers and suppliers, these business cycles also challenge key management, engineering and other employees of Applied who are vital to Applied's success.Applied.

During periods of decliningincreasing demand for semiconductor manufacturing equipment, customers typically reduce purchases, delay delivery of products and/or cancel orders. During downturns, Applied must be able to timely and effectively align its cost structure with prevailing market conditions, to manage its inventory levels to reduce the possibility of future inventory write-downs resulting from obsolescence and liability to suppliers for order cancellations, and to motivate and retain key employees. During periods of rapid growth, Applied must be able to acquire and/or develophave sufficient manufacturing capacity and inventory to meet customer demand, and must be able to attract, hire, assimilate and retain a sufficient number of qualified people.individuals. The semiconductor industry appears to be in the early stages of an upturn. However, management cannot predict the sustainability of a recovery, if any, and/or the industry’s rate of growth in such a recovery, both of which will be affected by many factors, including the global uncertainties discussed below. If Applied is unable to achieveeffectively manage its objectives in a timely mannerresources and production capacity during changes in business conditions,an industry upturn, there could be a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The semiconductor equipment industry is currently experiencing a continued Conversely, in downturns, Applied must be able to appropriately align its cost structure with prevailing market conditions and prolonged downturn. Management believes that this current downturn may be the most severe decline in historyeffectively motivate and cannot predict when a recovery will begin or what the industry's rate of growth will be in such a recovery.

Applied is exposedretain key employees. In response to the risksdownturn that began in fiscal 2001, Applied continues the implementation of operating a global business.
Currently, 74 percent of Applied's revenues result from sales outside the U.S.,realignment activities in order to align its cost structure with an increasing percentage of sales to customers headquartered in Asia. Certain manufacturing facilities and suppliers are also located outside the U.S. Managing Applied's global operations presents challenges, including periodic regional economic downturns, trade balance issues, varying business conditions and demands, political instability, variations in enforcement of intellectual propertyto enable Applied to focus resources on core research and contract rights in different jurisdictions, differences indevelopment programs. If Applied is unable to implement these realignment activities according to the abilitytimetable and to develop relationships with suppliers and other local businesses, changes in U.S. and international laws and regulations including U.S. export restrictions, fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, the ability to provide sufficient levels of technical support in different locations, cultural differences, shipping delays and terrorist actsextent anticipated, if implementation negatively affects Applied’s operations, net sales or acts of war, among other risks. Many of these challenges are present in China, which represents a large potential market for semiconductor equipment and whereprofitability, or if Applied anticipates significant opportunity for growth. Global uncertainties with respect to: 1) economic growth rates in various countries; 2) sustainability of demand for electronics products; 3) capital spending by semiconductor manufacturers; 4) price weakness for certain semiconductor devices; and 5) political instability in regions where Applied has operations, such as Israel and Asia, may also affect Applied'sdoes not maintain effective cost controls, Applied’s business, financial condition, andor results of operations.operations may be negatively affected.

23


Applied operates in a highly competitive industry characterized by increasingly rapid
Appliedtechnological changes.

Because it operates in a highly competitive industry characterized by increasingly rapid technological changes.
Applied'senvironment, Applied’s future success depends on performing better thanis heavily dependent upon effective development, commercialization and customer acceptance of its competitors in a numbernew products and services over those of ways, including its competitors. Specifically, these risks may include, but are not limited to, Applied’s ability to timely and cost-effectively: 1) develop new products, services and technologies, including those utilizing new materials, such as copper;copper and low-k materials; 2) develop improvements toimprove existing products, services and technologies; 3) develop new markets in the semiconductor industry for itsApplied’s products and services; 4) introduce new products and services to the marketplace; 5) achieve market acceptance;acceptance and accurately forecast demand for its products and services; 6) transition from 200mm systems to 300mm systems; 7) qualify new or improved products for volume manufacturing with its customers; 7)8) commence and adjust production to meet customer demands; and 8)9) price products and services appropriately.appropriately; and 10) lower customers’ cost of ownership. The development, introduction of and the ability to support of an increasingly broaderbroad set of new or improved products, services and technologies, including those enabling the transition to smaller device feature sizes, new materials and 300mm wafers, growsgrow increasingly complex and expensive over time. Such new or improved products and services may involve higher costs and reduced efficiencies compared to Applied'sApplied’s more established products and services and could adversely affect Applied'sApplied’s gross margins. If Applied does not develop and introduce new or improved products, services and technologies in a timely and cost-effective manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, its competitive position, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Applied is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes in the semiconductor industry.

The semiconductor industry is characterized by rapid ongoing changes, in the semiconductor industry.
Ongoing changes in the semiconductor industry, includingincluding: 1) more complex technology requirements, 2) the growth in Asia, increasing pressure on semiconductor manufacturers to allocate resources to activities that enhance their competitive advantage,changing information technology cost structure and the importance of driving down cost of ownership, 3) the increasing significance of consumer electronics as a driver for chip demand for semiconductors and the related focus on lower costs, have in turn resultedprices, 4) the growing type and variety of integrated circuits and applications, 5) an increasing number of applications across multiple substrate sizes in the increasing importance of spares and service assemiconductor industry, resulting in divergent interests among semiconductor manufacturers, 6) a growingrising percentage of semiconductor equipment suppliers' business. These changes are also requiringbusiness from customers in Asia and emergence of customers and competitors in new geographical regions, 7) customer demands for increasingly shorter lead times for the manufacture and installation of semiconductor manufacturing equipment suppliers to provideand 8) higher capital requirements for new semiconductor fabrication plants. These factors are increasing levelsthe need for customer partnering, use of foundries, collective research and development efforts and process integration support. These trends also heighten the importance of spare parts and services as a competitive advantage for semiconductor equipment manufacturers. In addition, key integrated circuit manufacturers have become influential in technology decisions made by their global partners. If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from thesethe ongoing changes occurring in the semiconductor industry, its business, financial condition and results of operationsoperation could be materially and adversely affected.

Applied is exposed to risks associated with a highly concentrated customer base.

Applied is exposed to risks associated with a highly concentrated customer base.
Applied'sApplied’s customer base is and has been highly concentrated. Orders from a relatively limited number of semiconductor manufacturers of integrated circuits have accounted for, and likely will continue to account for, a substantial portion of Applied'sApplied’s net sales, which may lead customers to demand pricing and other terms less favorable to Applied. In addition, sales to any single customer may vary significantly from quarter to quarter. If current customers delay, cancel or do not place orders, Applied may not be able to replace these orders with new orders. As Applied'sApplied’s products are configured to customer specifications, changing, rescheduling or canceling orders may result in significant and often non-recoverable costs. The resulting fluctuations in the amount of orand terms forof orders could have a material adverse effect on Applied'sApplied’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Applied is exposed to the risks of operating a global business.

Manufacturing interruptions or delays could affect Applied's     During fiscal 2003, more than 70 percent of Applied’s net sales were to regions outside the United States. Certain manufacturing facilities and suppliers of Applied are also located outside the United States. Managing Applied’s global operations presents challenges, including those arising from periodic regional economic downturns, trade balance issues, varying business conditions and demands, variations in enforcement of intellectual property and contract rights in different jurisdictions, differences in the ability to meet customer demand.
Applied'sdevelop relationships with suppliers and other local businesses, changes in U.S. and international laws and regulations including U.S. export restrictions, fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, the need to provide

24


sufficient levels of technical support in different locations, cultural differences and shipping delays, among other risks. Many of these challenges are present in China, a large potential market for semiconductor equipment and an area that Applied anticipates will present a significant opportunity for growth. These challenges, as well as global uncertainties with respect to: 1) economic growth rates in various countries; 2) sustainability of demand for electronics products; 3) capital spending by semiconductor manufacturers; 4) price weakness for certain semiconductor devices; and 5) political instability, terrorism, acts of war, or epidemics in regions where Applied has operations or sales, including Asia and Israel, may affect Applied’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The ability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees is vital to Applied’s success.

Applied’s success depends in large part on its ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees, including those in managerial, technical, marketing and support roles. Achieving this objective may be difficult due to changes in the global economy, the industry, Applied’s workforce actions and realignment activities, and its changes in management. If Applied does not successfully attract, retain and motivate key employees, the Company’s operating results and ability to capitalize on its opportunities may be materially and adversely affected.

Manufacturing interruptions or delays could affect Applied’s ability to meet customer demand.

Applied’s business depends on its ability to manufacturesupply products that meet the rapidly changing demands of its customers. Applied's ability to manufacturecustomers, which depends in part on the timely delivery of parts, components, and subassemblies (collectively "parts")(parts) from suppliers. Some key parts may be obtained only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. In addition, Applied outsources certain manufacturing activities. Significant interruptions of manufacturing operations as a result of the failure or inability of suppliers to timely deliver quality parts, outsourcing difficulties, natural disasters (such as earthquakes or tornadoes), or other causes (such as information technology or infrastructure failures, regional economic downturns, political instability, or terrorist acts orterrorism, acts of war)war, or epidemics) could result in delayed product deliveries or manufacturing inefficiencies. Any or all of these factors could materially and adversely affect Applied'sApplied’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Applied is exposed to risks associated with acquisitions.

Applied has made, and may in the future make, acquisitions of, or significant investments in, businesses with complementary products, services and/or technologies. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including but not limited to: 1) diversion of management’s attention from other operational matters; 2) the inability to realize expected synergies resulting from the acquisition; 3) failure to commercialize purchased technology; 4) impairment of acquired intangible assets as a result of technological advancements or worse-than-expected performance of the acquired company; 5) integration and retention of key employees; and 6) integration of operations. Mergers and acquisitions are inherently subject to significant risks, and the inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and adversely affect Applied’s business, financial condition and results of non-compliance with environmental and safety regulations.
operations.

Applied is subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental and safety regulations.

Applied is subject to environmental and safety regulations in connection with its business operations, including but not limited to regulations related to the development, manufacturingmanufacture and use of its products. Failure or inability to comply with existing or future environmental and safety regulations could result in significant remediation liabilities, the imposition of fines and/or the suspension or termination of development, manufacturingmanufacture or use of certain of its products, each of which could have a material adverse effect on Applied'sApplied’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Applied is exposed to various risks related to the regulatory environment.

Applied is exposed to risks associated with acquisitions.
Applied has made, and may in the future make, acquisitions of, or significant investments in, businesses with complementary products, services and/or technologies. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including but not limited to: 1) diversion of management's attention from other operational matters; 2) the inability to realize expected synergies resulting from the acquisition; 3) failure to commercialize purchased technology; and 4) impairment of acquired intangible assets as a result of technological advancements or worse-than-expected performance of the acquired company. Mergers and acquisitions are inherently subject to multiple significant risks, and the inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and adversely affect Applied's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Applied is exposed to various risks related to the regulatory environment.
Applied is subject to various risks related to: 1) new, different, inconsistent or even conflicting laws, rules and regulations that may be enacted by legislative bodies and/or regulatory agencies in the countriesregions in which Applied operates and with which Applied must comply; and 2) disagreements or disputes between national or regional regulatory agencies related to international trade.

For example, the World Trade Organization (WTO) has determined that the U.S. Foreign Sales Corporation (FSC) and Extraterritorial Income (ETI) exclusion constitute a prohibited export subsidysubsidies warranting the possible imposition of trade sanctions on certain goods, including semiconductor manufacturing equipment.goods. Applied has benefited from FSC and ETI tax provisions. Theprovisions, and the elimination of these tax benefits or imposition of sanctions could materially and adversely affect Applied's business,Applied’s financial condition and results of operations.

25


During fiscal 2002, Applied filed an application with the SEC for an exemptive order confirming that it is not subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Act), which requires companies primarily engaged in the business of investing in securities to comply with additional rules and regulations. Largely due to the industry downturn, Applied'sApplied’s ratios of investments to total assets and of interest income to net income have increased, resulting in the risk that Applied could be deemed to be covered by the Act. If the SEC does not grant the exemption, Applied may have to take other actions that could adversely affect its results of operations in order not to be subject to the Act.

Applied is exposed to various risks related to legal proceedings or claims.

Applied is exposedfrom time to various risks related to legal proceedings or claims.
Applied currentlytime is, and in the future may be, involved in legal proceedings or claims regarding patent infringement, intellectual property rights, antitrust, environmental regulations, securities, contracts, product performance, product liability, employment and other matters (see Item 3: Legal Proceedings).matters. In addition, from time to time, Applied on occasion receives notification from customers who believe that Applied owes them indemnification or other obligations related to infringement claims made against the customers by third parties. These legal proceedings and claims, whether with or without merit, are time-consuming and expensive to prosecute or defend and divert management'smanagement’s attention and resources. There can be no assurance regarding the outcome of current or future legal proceedings or claims. In addition, Applied'sApplied’s intellectual property rights may not provide significant competitive advantages if they are circumvented, invalidated or obsoletedrendered obsolete by the rapid pace of technological change. Furthermore, the laws of other countries permit the protection of Applied'sApplied’s proprietary rights to varying extents, compared to U.S. laws. Applied'sApplied’s success is dependent in part upon the protection of its intellectual property rights. Infringement of Applied'sApplied’s rights by a third party could result in uncompensated lost market and revenue opportunities for Applied. If Applied is not able to resolve a claim, negotiate a settlement of the matter, obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, and/or successfully prosecute or defend its position, Applied'sApplied’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Item 7a:

Item 7a:Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

At October 27, 2002, Applied's26, 2003, Applied’s investment portfolio included fixed-income securities with a fair value of approximately $4.2$5.0 billion. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase. Due to the short duration of Applied'sApplied’s investment portfolio, an immediate 10 percent change in interest rates is not expected to have a material effect on Applied'sApplied’s near-term financial condition or results of operations.

Applied's     Applied’s long-term debt bears interest primarily at fixed rates; therefore, Applied'sApplied’s results of operations would be affected by interest rate changes only to the extent that variable rate short-term notes payable are outstanding. Due to the short-term nature and relatively insignificant amount of Applied'sApplied’s short-term notes payable, an immediate 10 percent change in interest rates is not expected to have a material effect on Applied'sApplied’s near-term financial condition or results of operations.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Certain operations of Applied are conducted in foreign currencies, such as Japanese yen, the euro, Israeli shekel and British pounds.pound. Applied enters into forward exchange and currency option contracts to hedge a portion of, but not all, existing and anticipated foreign currency denominated transactions expected to occur within 12 months. Gains and losses on these contracts are generally recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations at the time that the related transactions being hedged are recognized. Because the effect of movements in currency exchange rates on forward exchange and currency option contracts generally offsets the related effect on the underlying items being hedged, these financial instruments are not expected to subject Applied to risks that would otherwise result from changes in currency exchange rates. Applied does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Net foreign currency gains and losses did not have a material effect on Applied'sApplied’s results of operations for fiscal 2000, 2001, 2002 or 2002.2003.

Forward exchange contracts are denominated in the same currency as the underlying transactions (primarily Japanese yen, the euro, Israeli shekel and British pounds)pound), and the terms of the forward exchange contracts generally match the terms of the underlying transactions. Applied'sApplied’s outstanding forward exchange contracts are marked to marketmarked-to-market (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), as are the majority of the related underlying transactions being hedged; therefore, the effect of exchange rate changes on forward exchange contracts is expected to be substantially offset by the effect of these changes on the

26


underlying transactions. The effect of an immediate 10 percent change in exchange rates on forward exchange contracts and the underlying hedged transactions is not expected to be material to Applied'sApplied’s near-term financial condition or results of operations. Applied'sApplied’s downside risk with respect to currency option contracts is limited to the premium paid for the right to exercise the option. Premiums paid for options outstanding at October 27, 200226, 2003 were not material.
Item 8:Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     

Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The consolidated financial statements required by this Item are set forth on the pages indicated at Item 15(a).

Item 9: Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9:Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     

PART IIINone.

Item 9a:Control and Procedures

     

Pursuant to Paragraph G(3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K, portions of the informationAs required by Part III of Form 10-K are incorporated by reference from Applied's Proxy Statement to be filed withRule 13a-15(b), Applied management, including the SEC in connection with the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders ("the Proxy Statement").

Item 10: DirectorsChief Executive Officer and Executive Officers of the Registrant

(a) Information concerning directors of Applied appears in Applied's Proxy Statement, under "Election of Directors." This portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

(b) For information with respect to Executive Officers, see Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under "Executive Officers of the Registrant."

(c) Information concerning Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance appears in Applied's Proxy Statement, under "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance." This portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11: Executive Compensation

Information concerning executive compensation appears in Applied's Proxy Statement, under "Executive Compensation and Related Information." This portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12: Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management appears in Applied's Proxy Statement, under "Principal Stockholders." This portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

The following table summarizes information with respect to options under Applied's equity compensation plans at October 27, 2002:


                                  Number of                           Number of securities
                               securities to be                       available for future
                                 issued upon       Weighted average   issuance under equity
                                 exercise of       exercise price of   compensation plans
                                 outstanding         outstanding      (excluding securities
                               options, warrants   options, warrants     reflected in
                                and rights(1)         and rights          column (a))
                                     (a)                  (b)                 (c)
- ------------------------------ ------------------- -----------------  -----------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Equity compensation
  plans approved by
  security holders........             166,710               $13.75                63,477 (2)
Equity compensation
  plans not approved by
  security holders........             101,852 (3)           $19.67                64,532 (4)
- ------------------------------ ------------------- -----------------  -----------------------
                                       268,562               $16.00               128,009
- ------------------------------ ------------------- -----------------  -----------------------

(1) Includes only options outstanding under Applied's stock option plans, as no stock warrants or rights were outstanding as of October 27, 2002.

(2) Includes 22,509 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the Applied Materials, Inc. Employees' Stock Purchase Plan.

(3) Includes options to purchase 2,858 shares of Applied's common stock assumed through various mergers and acquisitions, after giving effect to the applicable exchange ratios. These assumed options had a weighted average exercise price of $13.57 per share. No further shares are available for issuance under these assumed plans.

(4) Includes 8,626 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the Applied Materials, Inc. Employees' Stock Purchase Plan for Offshore Employees.

The equity compensation plans not approved by security holders have generally the same features as those approved by security holders. For further details regarding Applied's equity compensation plans, see Note 9 of Notes to ConsolidatedChief Financial Statements.

Item 13: Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

None.

Item 14: Controls and Procedures

Based on theirOfficer, conducted an evaluation as of a date within 90 daysthe end of the filing dateperiod covered by this report, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Applied's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that Applied'sthe effectiveness of Applied’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Applied’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of 1934 (the Exchange Act)the end of the period covered by this report. As required by Rule 13a-15(d), Applied management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of Applied’s internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are effectivereasonably likely to ensurematerially affect, Applied’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on that information required to be disclosed by Applied in reports that it files or submits underevaluation, there has been no such change during the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.fourth fiscal quarter.

There were no significant changes in Applied's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation and up to the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, and therefore there were no corrective actions taken.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system arewill be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because

27


PART III

Pursuant to Paragraph G(3) of these and other inherent limitationsthe General Instructions to Form 10-K, portions of control systems, there canthe information required by Part III of Form 10-K are incorporated by reference from Applied’s Proxy Statement to be no assurance that any design will succeedfiled with the SEC in achieving its stated goalsconnection with the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“the Proxy Statement”).

Item 10:Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

     (1) Information concerning directors, including Applied’s audit committee financial expert, appears in Applied’s Proxy Statement, under all potential future conditions, regardless“Election of how remote.

PART IVDirectors.” This portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

     

Item 15: Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports(2) For information with respect to Executive Officers, see Part I of this Annual Report on Form 8-K10-K, under “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

     (3) Information concerning Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance appears in Applied’s Proxy Statement, under “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.” This portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Applied has adopted the Standards of Business Conduct, a code of ethics with which every person who works for Applied is expected to comply. The Standards of Business Conduct are publicly available on Applied’s website under the Investors Section (athttp://www.appliedmaterials.com/ investors/cgstandards.html#1). This website address is intended to be an inactive, textual reference only; none of the material on this website is part of this report. If any substantive amendments are made to the Standards of Business Conduct or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the code to Applied’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Corporate Controller, Applied will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on that website or in a report on Form 8-K.

Item 11:Executive Compensation

Information concerning executive compensation appears in Applied’s Proxy Statement, under “Executive Compensation and Related Information.” This portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12:Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

     Information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management appears in Applied’s Proxy Statement, under “Principal Stockholders.” This portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

28


The following table summarizes information with respect to options under Applied’s equity compensation plans at October 26, 2003:

             
(a)(b)(c)
Number of securities
available for future
issuance under equity
Number of securitiesWeighted averagecompensation plans
to be issued uponexercise price of(excluding securities
exercise of outstandingoutstanding options,reflected in
Plan categoryoptions, warrants and rights(1)warrants and rightscolumn (a))




(In thousands, except prices)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  129,210  $15.45   61,174(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  122,825(3) $17.74   38,548(4)
   
       
 
   252,035  $16.56   99,722 
   
       
 


(1) Includes only options outstanding under Applied’s stock option plans, as no stock warrants or rights were outstanding as of October 26, 2003.
(2) Includes 17,633 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the Applied Materials, Inc. Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan.
(3) Includes options to purchase 1,994 shares of Applied’s common stock assumed through various mergers and acquisitions, after giving effect to the applicable exchange ratios. These assumed options had a weighted average exercise price of $14.26 per share. No further shares are available for issuance under these assumed plans.
(4) Includes 7,295 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the Applied Materials, Inc. Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan for Offshore Employees.

     The equity compensation plans not approved by security holders have generally the same features as those approved by security holders. For further details regarding Applied’s equity compensation plans, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 13:Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information appearing in Applied’s fiscal 2003 Proxy Statement under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14:Principal Accounting Fees and Services

     Information concerning principal accountant fees and services and the audit committee’s preapproval policies and procedures appear in Applied’s Proxy Statement under the heading “Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP” and is incorporated herein by reference.

29


PART IV

Item 15:Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Financial Statements:

Page Number

(1)Financial Statements:
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended October 26, 200331
Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 27, 2002 and October 26, 200332
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended October 26, 200333
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 26, 200334
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements35
Report of Management56
Report of Independent Auditors57
(2)Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three years in the period ended October 26, 200362
(3)Exhibits:
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     (b) On August 12, 2003, Applied furnished under Item 12 of Form 8-K the press release announcing Applied’s financial results for the fiscal quarter ended July 27, 2003, Applied’s consolidated condensed balance sheets as of October 27, 2002 and July 27, 2003, and Applied’s consolidated condensed statements of operations for the three years inmonths and the periodnine months ended OctoberJuly 28, 2002 and July 27, 20022003.

Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 28, 2001 and October 27, 2002

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for each of the three years in the period ended October 27, 2002

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 27, 2002

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Management

Report of Independent Accountants

(2) Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three years in the period ended October 27, 2002

(3) Exhibits:

The exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(b) A Report on Form 8-K was filed on September 6, 2002. The report contained information announcing that the Principal Executive Officer, James C. Morgan, and Principal Financial Officer, Joseph R. Bronson, submitted to the SEC sworn statements pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Order No. 4-460.

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

30




APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


                                                        October 29,  October 28,   October 27,
Fiscal year ended                                          2000         2001         2002
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Net sales...................................            $9,564,412   $7,343,248    $5,062,312
Cost of products sold.......................             4,708,684    4,091,215     3,005,651
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
Gross margin................................             4,855,728    3,252,033     2,056,661

Operating expenses:
    Research, development and engineering...             1,107,922    1,198,799     1,052,269
    Marketing and selling...................               483,316      508,214       385,693
    General and administrative..............               477,437      393,710       323,262
    Non-recurring items.....................                40,000      221,164        85,479
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
Income from operations......................             2,747,053      930,146       209,958

Non-recurring income........................                68,158          --            --

Interest expense............................                51,375       47,640        49,357
Interest income.............................               184,008      221,296       179,910
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
Income from operations before
    income taxes and cumulative effect
    of change in accounting principle.......             2,947,844    1,103,802       340,511

Provision for income taxes..................               884,292      328,574        71,507
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
Income from operations before
    cumulative effect of change
    in accounting principle.................             2,063,552      775,228       269,004

Cumulative effect of change in
    accounting principle, net of tax........                   --      (267,399)          --
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
Net income..................................            $2,063,552     $507,829      $269,004
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------

Earnings per share:
    Basic--income from operations before
        cumulative effect of change
        in accounting principle.............                 $1.28        $0.48         $0.16
    Basic--cumulative effect of change
        in accounting principle.............                   --         (0.17)          --
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
        Total basic                                          $1.28        $0.31         $0.16
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
    Diluted--income from operations before
        cumulative effect of change
        in accounting principle.............                 $1.20        $0.46         $0.16
    Diluted--cumulative effect of change
        in accounting principle.............                   --         (0.16)          --
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
        Total diluted.......................                 $1.20        $0.30         $0.16
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
Weighted average number of shares:
    Basic...................................             1,613,160    1,626,404     1,643,612
    Diluted.................................             1,718,338    1,694,658     1,701,557
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------------

               
October 28,October 27,October 26,
Fiscal year200120022003




(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Net sales $7,343,248  $5,062,312  $4,477,291 
Cost of products sold  4,091,215   3,005,651   2,872,836 
   
   
   
 
Gross margin  3,252,033   2,056,661   1,604,455 
Operating expenses:            
 Research, development and engineering  1,198,799   1,052,269   920,618 
 Marketing and selling  508,214   385,693   325,189 
 General and administrative  393,710   323,262   300,676 
 Restructuring, asset impairments and other charges  221,164   85,479   371,754 
   
   
   
 
Income/(loss) from operations  930,146   209,958   (313,782)
Interest expense  47,640   49,357   46,875 
Interest income  221,296   179,910   149,101 
   
   
   
 
Income/(loss) from operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  1,103,802   340,511   (211,556)
Provision for/(benefit from) income taxes  328,574   71,507   (62,409)
   
   
   
 
Income/(loss) from operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  775,228   269,004   (149,147)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax  (267,399)      
   
   
   
 
Net income/(loss) $507,829  $269,004  $(149,147)
   
   
   
 
Earnings/(loss) per share:            
 Basic — income/(loss) from operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $0.48  $0.16  $(0.09)
 Basic — cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  (0.17)      
   
   
   
 
  Total basic $0.31  $0.16  $(0.09)
   
   
   
 
 Diluted — income/(loss) from operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $0.46  $0.16  $(0.09)
 Diluted — cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  (0.16)      
   
   
   
 
  Total diluted $0.30  $0.16  $(0.09)
   
   
   
 
Weighted average number of shares:            
 Basic  1,626,404   1,643,612   1,659,557 
 Diluted  1,694,658   1,701,557   1,659,557 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

31




APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


                                                           October 28,    October 27,
                                                              2001           2002
- ------------------------------------------------------   -------------  -------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

ASSETS

Current assets:
    Cash and cash equivalents.........................     $1,356,304     $1,284,791
    Short-term investments............................      3,485,088      3,644,735
    Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful
       accounts of $2,700 at 2001 and $2,075 at 2002..        776,451      1,046,016
    Inventories.......................................      1,412,997      1,273,816
    Deferred income taxes.............................        551,785        565,936
    Other current assets..............................        199,549        257,499
- ------------------------------------------------------   -------------  -------------
Total current assets..................................      7,782,174      8,072,793

Property, plant and equipment, net....................      1,706,488      1,764,937
Other assets..........................................        339,848        387,035
- ------------------------------------------------------   -------------  -------------
Total assets..........................................     $9,828,510    $10,224,765
======================================================   =============  =============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
           
October 27,October 26,
20022003


(In thousands,
except per share amounts)
ASSETS
Current assets:        
 Cash and cash equivalents $1,284,791  $1,364,857 
 Short-term investments  3,644,735   4,128,349 
 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,075 at 2002 and $1,847 at 2003  1,046,016   912,875 
 Inventories  1,273,816   950,692 
 Deferred income taxes  565,936   782,823 
 Other current assets  257,499   231,177 
   
   
 
  Total current assets  8,072,793   8,370,773 
Property, plant and equipment  3,223,133   3,094,427 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (1,458,196)  (1,534,597)
   
   
 
 Net property, plant and equipment  1,764,937   1,559,830 
Goodwill, net  202,290   223,521 
Purchased technology and other intangible assets, net  129,130   92,512 
Other assets  55,615   64,986 
   
   
 
  Total assets $10,224,765  $10,311,622 
   
   
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:        
 Notes payable $40,323  $ 
 Current portion of long-term debt  9,453   105,292 
 Accounts payable and accrued expenses  1,348,156   1,319,471 
 Income taxes payable  103,524   216,114 
   
   
 
  Total current liabilities  1,501,456   1,640,877 
Long-term debt  573,853   456,422 
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities  129,807   146,289 
   
   
 
  Total liabilities  2,205,116   2,243,588 
   
   
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)        
Stockholders’ equity:        
 Preferred stock: $.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized; no shares issued      
 Common stock: $.01 par value per share; 2,500,000 shares authorized; 1,648,028 and 1,677,400 shares outstanding at 2002 and 2003, respectively  16,480   16,774 
 Additional paid-in capital  2,022,546   2,223,553 
 Deferred stock compensation, net     (1,543)
 Retained earnings  5,962,014   5,812,867 
 Accumulated other comprehensive income  18,609   16,383 
   
   
 
  Total stockholders’ equity  8,019,649   8,068,034 
   
   
 
  Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $10,224,765  $10,311,622 
   
   
 

     See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

32


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Notes payable..................................... $ -- $40,323 Current portion of long-term debt................. 4,807 9,453 Accounts payable and accrued expenses............. 1,477,531 1,348,156 Income taxes payable.............................. 50,478 103,524 - ------------------------------------------------------ ------------- ------------- Total current liabilities............................. 1,532,816 1,501,456 Long-term debt........................................ 564,805 573,853 Deferred income taxes and other liabilities........... 124,152 129,807 - ------------------------------------------------------ ------------- ------------- Total liabilities..................................... 2,221,773 2,205,116 - ------------------------------------------------------ ------------- ------------- Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock: $.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized; no shares issued ........... -- -- Common stock: $.01 par value per share; 2,500,000 shares authorized; 1,631,540 and 1,648,028 shares outstanding at 2001 and 2002, respectively................................... 16,315 16,480 Additional paid-in capital........................ 1,872,967 2,022,546 Retained earnings................................. 5,693,010 5,962,014 Accumulated other comprehensive income............ 24,445 18,609 - ------------------------------------------------------ ------------- ------------- Total stockholders' equity............................ 7,606,737 8,019,649 - ------------------------------------------------------ ------------- ------------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............ $9,828,510 $10,224,765 ====================================================== ============= =============

                                
Accumulated
Common StockAdditionalDeferredOther

Paid-InStockRetainedComprehensive
SharesAmountCapitalCompensationEarningsIncome/(Loss)Total







(In thousands)
Balance at October 29, 2000  1,624,924  $16,249  $1,922,088  $  $5,185,181  $(19,170) $7,104,348 
 Components of comprehensive income:                            
  Net income              507,829      507,829 
  Change in unrealized gain on investments                 57,748   57,748 
  Change in unrealized gain on derivative instruments                 4,621   4,621 
  Translation adjustments                 (18,754)  (18,754)
                           
 
   Comprehensive income                         551,444 
 Net issuance under stock plans, including tax benefits of $106,579  25,586   256   322,089            322,345 
 Stock repurchases  (18,970)  (190)  (371,210)           (371,400)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at October 28, 2001  1,631,540   16,315   1,872,967      5,693,010   24,445   7,606,737 
 Components of comprehensive income:                            
  Net income              269,004      269,004 
  Change in unrealized gain on investments                 (16,491)  (16,491)
  Change in unrealized gain on derivative instruments                 1,366   1,366 
  Translation adjustments                 9,289   9,289 
                           
 
   Comprehensive income                          263,168 
 Net issuance under stock plans, including tax benefits of $75,253  23,283   233   274,506            274,739 
 Stock repurchases  (6,795)  (68)  (124,927)           (124,995)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at October 27, 2002  1,648,028   16,480   2,022,546      5,962,014   18,609   8,019,649 
 Components of comprehensive loss:                            
  Net loss              (149,147)     (149,147)
  Change in unrealized gain on investments                 (17,165)  (17,165)
  Change in unrealized gain on derivative instruments                 (4,058)  (4,058)
  Translation adjustments                 18,997   18,997 
                           
 
   Comprehensive loss                          (151,373)
 Net issuance under stock plans, including tax benefits of $124,238  44,692   447   446,509            446,956 
 Issuance of restricted stock to employees  308   3   4,279   (4,279)        3 
 Amortization of deferred stock compensation           2,736         2,736 
 Stock repurchases  (15,588)  (156)  (249,781)           (249,937)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at October 26, 2003  1,677,440  $16,774  $2,223,553  $(1,543) $5,812,867  $16,383  $8,068,034 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

33




APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY


                                                                                   Accumulated
                                         Common Stock      Additional                 Other
                                     --------------------   Paid-In    Retained   Comprehensive
                                       Shares    Amount     Capital    Earnings   Income/(Loss)    Total
- ------------------------------------ ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- ------------- -----------
(In thousands)

Balance at October 31, 1999....      1,586,448   $15,864  $1,435,791  $3,122,337        $1,266  $4,575,258
  Components of comprehensive income:CASH FLOWS
                
October 28,October 27,October 26,
Fiscal year200120022003




(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:            
 Net income/(loss) $507,829  $269,004  $(149,147)
 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax  267,399       
 Adjustments required to reconcile income/(loss) from operations to cash provided by operating activities:            
  Acquired in-process research and development expense  10,000   8,000    
  Non-cash portion of restructuring, asset impairments and other charges  74,218   27,605   88,859 
  Depreciation and amortization  386,971   387,526   381,655 
  Deferred income taxes  88,230   (161)  (208,565)
  Tax benefits from employee stock option plans  106,579   75,253   124,238 
  Amortization of deferred compensation        2,736 
  Changes in assets and liabilities, net of amounts acquired:            
   Accounts receivable  845,499   (278,387)  144,369 
   Inventories  321,164   147,015   331,161 
   Other current assets  10,385   (53,289)  28,586 
   Other assets  (40,230)  (968)  (14,332)
   Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (687,132)  (138,552)  (59,923)
   Income taxes payable  (332,622)  51,475   111,624 
   Other liabilities  22,014   (2,383)  20,493 
   
   
   
 
Cash provided by operating activities  1,580,304   492,138   801,754 
   
   
   
 
Cash flows from investing activities:            
 Capital expenditures  (769,126)  (476,457)  (265,280)
 Asset retirements  58,506   59,377   53,321 
 Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired  (21,017)  (107,462)  (13,498)
 Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments  2,054,004   2,188,117   1,941,111 
 Purchases of short-term investments  (2,905,680)  (2,356,157)  (2,446,927)
   
   
   
 
Cash used for investing activities  (1,583,313)  (692,582)  (731,273)
   
   
   
 
Cash flows from financing activities:            
 Short-term debt borrowings  851,568   66,534    
 Short-term debt repayments  (932,777)  (24,770)  (41,949)
 Long-term debt borrowings     21,713    
 Long-term debt repayments  (10,395)  (7,126)  (22,456)
 Common stock issuances  202,379   199,486   322,721 
 Common stock repurchases  (371,400)  (124,995)  (249,937)
   
   
   
 
Cash provided by/(used for) financing activities  (260,625)  130,842   8,379 
   
   
   
 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  (27,666)  (1,911)  1,206 
   
   
   
 
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (291,300)  (71,513)  80,066 
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of year  1,647,604   1,356,304   1,284,791 
   
   
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents — end of year $1,356,304  $1,284,791  $1,364,857 
   
   
   
 

     Cash payments for interest were $41,482 for fiscal 2001, $40,219 for fiscal 2002 and $41,967 for fiscal 2003. Net income................. -- -- -- 2,063,552 -- 2,063,552 Translation adjustments.... -- -- -- -- (20,436) (20,436) ----------- Comprehensive income..... 2,043,116 Net issuance under stock plans, including tax benefits of $387,478....... 44,866 449 663,387 -- -- 663,836 Stock repurchases............ (6,390) (64) (177,090) -- -- (177,154) Adjustment to conformcash activities for income taxes were $583,162 payments for fiscal year end2001, $65,470 refunds for Etec Systems, Inc. ............. -- -- -- (708) -- (708) - ------------------------------------ ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- Balance at October 29, 2000.... 1,624,924 16,249 1,922,088 5,185,181 (19,170) 7,104,348 Components of comprehensive income: Net income................. -- -- -- 507,829 -- 507,829 Change in unrealized gain on investments........... -- -- -- -- 57,748 57,748 Change in unrealized gain on derivative instruments... -- -- -- -- 4,621 4,621 Translation adjustments.... -- -- -- -- (18,754) (18,754) ----------- Comprehensive income..... 551,444 Net issuance under stock plans, including tax benefits of $106,579....... 25,586 256 322,089 -- -- 322,345 Stock repurchases............ (18,970) (190) (371,210) -- -- (371,400) - ------------------------------------ ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- Balance at October 28, 2001.... 1,631,540 16,315 1,872,967 5,693,010 24,445 7,606,737 Components of comprehensive income: Net income................. -- -- -- 269,004 -- 269,004 Change in unrealized gain on investments........... -- -- -- -- (16,491) (16,491) Change in unrealized gain on derivative instruments... -- -- -- -- 1,366 1,366 Translation adjustments.... -- -- -- -- 9,289 9,289 ----------- Comprehensive income..... 263,168 Net issuance under stock plans, including tax benefits of $75,253........ 23,283 233 274,506 -- -- 274,739 Stock repurchases............ (6,795) (68) (124,927) -- -- (124,995) - ------------------------------------ ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- Balance at October 27, 2002.... 1,648,028 $16,480 $2,022,546 $5,962,014 $18,609 $8,019,649 ==================================== ========== ========= =========== =========== ============= ===========

fiscal 2002 and $119,065 refunds for fiscal 2003.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

34




APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


                                                October 29,   October 28,   October 27,
Fiscal year ended                                  2000          2001          2002
- ---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
(In thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities:
  Net income.................................   $2,063,552      $507,829      $269,004
  Cumulative effect of change in accounting
    principle, net of tax....................           --       267,399            --
  Adjustments required to reconcile income
    from operations to cash
    provided by operating activities:
    Acquired in-process research and
      development expense....................           --        10,000         8,000
    Non-cash portion of restructuring
      charges................................           --        74,218        27,605
    Depreciation and amortization............      361,970       386,971       387,526
    Deferred income taxes....................     (237,262)       88,230          (161)
    Tax benefits from employee stock
      option plans...........................      387,478       106,579        75,253
    Adjustment to conform fiscal year end
      for Etec Systems, Inc..................         (708)           --            --
    Changes in assets and liabilities, net
      of amounts acquired:
      Accounts receivable....................   (1,086,262)      845,499      (278,387)
      Inventories............................     (788,590)      321,164       147,015
      Other current assets...................      (57,683)       10,385       (53,289)
      Other assets...........................       19,460       (40,230)         (968)
      Accounts payable and accrued expenses..      835,675      (687,132)     (138,552)
      Income taxes payable...................      138,674      (332,622)       51,475
      Other liabilities......................       15,511        22,014        (2,383)
- ---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash provided by operating activities........    1,651,815     1,580,304       492,138
- ---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
  Capital expenditures, net of retirements...     (383,255)     (710,620)     (417,080)
  Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash
    acquired.................................           --       (21,017)     (107,462)
  Proceeds from sales and maturities of
    short-term investments...................    2,008,257     2,054,004     2,188,117
  Purchases of short-term investments........   (2,637,438)   (2,905,680)   (2,356,157)
- ---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash used for investing activities...........   (1,012,436)   (1,583,313)     (692,582)
- ---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
  Short-term debt activity, net..............       86,382       (81,209)       41,764
  Long-term debt borrowings..................           --            --        21,713
  Long-term debt repayments..................      (36,444)      (10,395)       (7,126)
  Issuance of common stock
    under stock plans........................      276,358       202,379       199,486
  Repurchases of common stock................     (177,154)     (371,400)     (124,995)
- ---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash provided by/(used for)
  financing activities.......................      149,142      (260,625)      130,842
- ---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash......       (9,038)      (27,666)       (1,911)
- ---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Increase/(decrease) in
  cash and cash equivalents..................      779,483      (291,300)      (71,513)
Cash and cash equivalents--beginning of year.      868,121     1,647,604     1,356,304
- ---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Cash and cash equivalents--end of year.......   $1,647,604    $1,356,304    $1,284,791
=============================================  ============  ============  ============

Cash payments for interest were $43,601 for fiscal 2000, $41,482 for fiscal 2001 and $40,219 for fiscal 2002. Net cash activities for income taxes were $562,885 payments for fiscal 2000, $583,162 payments for fiscal 2001 and $65,470 refunds for fiscal 2002.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.




APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     

NOTE 1  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Applied Materials, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Applied)(Applied or the Company) after elimination of intercompany balances and transactions. All references to fiscal year apply to Applied’s fiscal year which ends on the last Sunday in October.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments All highly-liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. All of Applied'sApplied’s short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale at the respective balance sheet dates. Investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value based upon quoted market prices, and any material temporary difference between the cost and fair value of an investment is presented as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The specific identification method is used to determine the realized gains and losses on investments.

Inventories Inventories are generally stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis.

Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives for financial reporting purposes are as follows: buildings and improvements, five to 33 years; demonstration and manufacturing equipment, three to five years; software, three to five years; and furniture, fixtures and other equipment, three to 15 years. Land improvements are amortized over the shorter of 15 years or the estimated useful life. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of five years or the lease term. During fiscal 2003, Applied reviewed the estimated useful lives of its fixed assets. This analysis indicated that estimated useful lives for certain assets should be increased based on historical experience and other considerations. This change in estimate resulted in approximately $23 million less depreciation expense in fiscal 2003 than would have been recognized under previous estimates.

Intangible Assets Applied adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 "Goodwill(SFAS 142), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," in the first fiscal quarter of 2002. SFAS No. 142 supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 17, "Intangible“Intangible Assets," and discontinues the amortization of goodwill. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, beginning October 29, 2001, goodwill is no longer amortized, but is reviewed at least annually during the fourth fiscal quarter for impairment. Purchased technology and other intangible assets are presented at cost, net of accumulated amortization, and are amortized over their estimated useful lives of threefive to 10 years using the straight-line method.

Long-Lived Assets Applied reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Applied assesses these assets for impairment based on estimated future cash flows from these assets.

Research, Development and Engineering Costs Research, development and engineering costs are expensed as incurred.

Advertising Costs Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs were not material for all periods presented.

Revenue Recognition Applied recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; seller's

35


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

seller’s price to buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. At Applied, this policy generally results in revenue recognition at the following points: 1) Forfor all transactions where legal title passes to the customer upon shipment, Applied recognizes revenue upon shipment for all products that have been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to shipment. However, a portion of revenue associated with certain installation-related tasks, is recognized based on the estimated fair value of the tasks, is recognized when the tasks are completed.completed; 2) Forfor products that have not been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to shipment, revenue is recognized at customer technical acceptance.acceptance; 3) Forfor transactions where legal title does not transfer at shipment, revenue is recognized when legal title passes to the customer, which is typically at customer technical acceptance.acceptance; and 4) for transactions containing multiple deliverables, the unearned portion is deferred until all four revenue recognition criteria have been met. Applied allocates revenue from multiple element arrangements to the various elements based upon relative fair values, which are generally determined from price lists. A provision for the estimated cost of warranty is recorded when revenue is recognized. Applied'sApplied’s shipping terms are customarily FOB Applied shipping point or equivalent terms. SparesSpare parts revenue is generally recognized upon shipment. License fees on software marketed as standalone products are recognized upon shipment when all four revenue recognition criteria have been met. Service revenue and software maintenance fees are generally recognized ratably over the period of the related contract. Prior to the implementation of the Securities and Exchange Commission'sCommission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), "Revenue“Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements," in fiscal 2001, Applied generally recognized revenue for established equipment upon shipment.

Change in Accounting Policy Applied implemented SAB 101 forduring the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001, retroactively effective to the beginning of fiscal 2001. Since the implementation of SAB 101 was retroactively effective to the beginning of fiscal 2001, the first three fiscal quarters of 2001 were restated in the fiscal 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Applied recorded a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $267 million (net of income tax benefit of $112 million), or $0.16 per diluted share, for the restated first fiscal quarter of 2001. This charge represents the after-tax difference between the new and previous revenue recognition policies prior to fiscal 2001 as of the implementation date at the beginning of fiscal 2001. Therefore, no restatement of years prior to fiscal 2001 was required. For periods prior to fiscal 2001, data was not available to provide pro forma information as if the change in accounting principle were applied retroactively. SAB 101 had no effect on Applied'sApplied’s revenue recognition policy for spares,spare parts, service, license fees on software marketed as standalone products orand software maintenance fees. The cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $267 million included $651 million of revenue recognized prior to fiscal 2001, of which $642 million was recognized during fiscal 2001. The remaining $9 million of revenue was recognized during the first fiscal quarter of 2002.

Derivative Financial Instruments Applied uses financial instruments, such as forward exchange and currency option contracts, to hedge a portion of, but not all, existing and anticipated foreign currency denominated transactions expected to occur within 12 months. The terms of currency instruments used for hedging purposes are generally consistent with the timing of the transactions being hedged. The purpose of Applied'sApplied’s foreign currency management is to managemitigate the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated revenues, costs and eventual cash flows. Applied adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended, in the first fiscal quarterAll of 2001. Accordingly, all of Applied'sApplied’s derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value based upon quoted market prices for comparable instruments. For derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges of anticipated foreign currency denominated transactions, the effective portion of the gain or loss on these hedges is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders'stockholders’ equity, and is reclassified into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. If the transaction being hedged fails to occur, or if a portion of any derivative is ineffective, the gain or loss on the associated financial instrument is recorded immediately in earnings. For derivative instruments used to hedge existing foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities, the gain or loss on these hedges is recorded immediately in earnings to offset the changes in the fair value of

36


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

the assets or liabilities being hedged. Applied does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Foreign Currency Translation   Applied's Applied’s subsidiaries, with the exception of the subsidiary located in Japan and Europe operate primarily using local functional currencies. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period, and revenues and costs are translated using average exchange rates for the period. The resulting translation adjustments are presented as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Applied's subsidiaries located in Ireland, Italy, Israel, Korea, Taiwan, Southeast Asia and China primarilyUnited Kingdom, use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period, except for non-monetary assets, such as inventories and property, plant and equipment, that are translated using historical exchange rates. Revenues and costs are translated using average exchange rates for the period, except for costs related to those balance sheet items that are translated using historical exchange rates. The resulting translation gains and losses are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as incurred. Applied’s subsidiary located in the United Kingdom operates primarily using the British pound, and therefore, the British pound has been determined to be the functional currency for the United Kingdom. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities of this subsidiary are translated using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period, and revenues and costs are translated using average exchange rates for the period. The resulting translation adjustments are presented as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) in stockholders’ equity.

Employee Stock Plans     Prior to the second fiscal quarter of 2003, Applied’s subsidiaries located in Japan and Europe operated primarily using local currencies as their functional currencies. During the second fiscal quarter of 2003, Applied reviewed the functional currencies of its subsidiaries and determined that the U.S. dollar was most appropriate for its subsidiaries with the exception of its subsidiary located in the United Kingdom. This determination was made as a result of changes in facts, circumstances, scope of operations and business practices. The change in the functional currencies did not have a material effect on Applied’s business, results of operations and financial position for fiscal 2003.

Stock-Based Compensation During the second fiscal quarter of 2003, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS 148), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123” became effective for Applied.

     Applied measures compensation expense for its stock-based employee compensation plans using the intrinsic value method. As permitted bythe exercise price of all options granted under these plans was equal to the fair market price of the underlying common stock on the grant date, no stock-based employee compensation cost is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

     In accordance with SFAS 148 and SFAS No. 123 "Accounting(SFAS 123), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"” Applied’s pro forma option expense is computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This model was developed for use in estimating the value of publicly traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Applied’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options; therefore, in the opinion of management, the Black-Scholes option pricing model generally used to comply with SFAS 148 and SFAS 123 does not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of Applied’s options.

     To comply with SFAS 148, Applied electedis presenting the following table to continue to applyillustrate the effect on the net income/(loss) and earnings/(loss) per share if it had applied the fair value recognition provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock IssuedSFAS 123, as amended, to Employees," and related interpretations in accounting for itsoptions granted under the stock-based employee compensation plans. For purposes

37


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

of this pro forma disclosure, the estimated value of the options is amortized ratably to expense over the options’ vesting periods.

              
Fiscal year200120022003




(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Reported net income/(loss) $507,829  $269,004  $(149,147)
Stock compensation expense, net of tax  (217,004)  (316,699)  (389,100)
   
   
   
 
Pro forma net income/(loss) $290,825  $(47,695) $(538,247)
   
   
   
 
Earnings/(loss) per share as reported:            
 Basic $0.31  $0.16  $(0.09)
 Diluted $0.30  $0.16  $(0.09)
Pro forma earnings/(loss) per share:            
 Basic $0.18  $(0.03) $(0.32)
 Diluted $0.17  $(0.03) $(0.32)

Based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the weighted average estimated fair value of employee stock option grants was $8.98 for fiscal 2001, $10.87 for fiscal 2002 and $6.85 for fiscal 2003. The weighted average estimated fair value of purchase rights granted under the Employees’ Stock Purchase Plans (ESPP) was $6.26 for fiscal 2001, $6.29 for fiscal 2002 and $5.31 for fiscal 2003. In calculating pro forma compensation, the fair value of each stock option grant and stock purchase plans. Appliedright is generally not required under APB Opinion No. 25estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and related interpretations to recognize compensation expense in connection with itsthe following weighted average assumptions:

                         
Stock OptionsESPP


Fiscal year200120022003200120022003







Dividend yield  None   None   None   None   None   None 
Expected volatility  67%   69%   67%   67%   69%   67% 
Risk-free interest rate  3.94%   3.58%   2.00%   5.52%   2.42%   1.44% 
Expected life (in years)  3.4   3.6   3.6   0.5   0.5   2.0 

     For additional information on Applied’s employee stock option and stock purchase plans. Applied is required by SFAS No. 123 to present, in thebenefit plans, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the pro forma effects on reported net income and earnings per share as if compensation expense had been recognized based on the fair value method of accounting prescribed by SFAS No. 123.Statements.

Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject Applied to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade accounts receivable and derivative financial instruments used in hedging activities. Applied invests in a variety of financial instruments, such as, but not limited to, certificates of deposit, corporate and municipal bonds, and U.S. Treasury and agency securities, and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution or commercial issuer. Applied'sApplied’s customers consist of semiconductor manufacturers located throughout the world. Applied performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers'customers’ financial condition and generally requires no collateral to secure accounts receivable. Applied maintains a reserve for potentially uncollectible accounts receivable based on its assessment of the collectibility of accounts receivable. In addition, Applied may utilize letters of credit to mitigate credit risk when considered appropriate. Applied is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments, but does not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations.

Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share is determined using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is determined using the weighted average number of common shares and equivalents (representing the dilutive effect of stock options) outstanding during the period.

38


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

For purposes of computing diluted earnings per share, weighted average common share equivalents do not include stock options with an exercise price that exceeded the average fair market value of Applied'sApplied’s common stock for the period as the effect would be anti-dilutive. Options to purchase shares of common stock that were excluded from the computation were as follows:


Fiscal year ended                        2000       2001       2002
- ------------------------------------- --------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Number of shares excluded.............   5,814     21,362     77,271
Average exercise price................  $42.17     $32.46     $23.82
- ------------------------------------- --------- ---------- ----------
             
Fiscal year200120022003




(In thousands, except prices)
Number of shares excluded  21,362   77,271   129,205 
Average exercise price $32.46  $23.82  $21.45 
Recent Accounting Pronouncement

Recent Accounting Pronouncements  In August 2001,January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFASFASB Interpretation No. 143, "Accounting46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51.” FIN 46 provides guidance on: 1) the identification of entities for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 addresseswhich control is achieved through means other than through voting rights, known as “variable interest entities” (VIEs); and 2) which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary and when it should consolidate a VIE. This new requirement for consolidation applies to entities: 1) where the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial accountinginterest; or 2) whose equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and reportingall other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. FIN 46 is effective for obligations associated withall new VIEs created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For VIEs created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the retirementprovisions of tangible long-lived assetsFIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period ending after December 15, 2003. Certain disclosures are effective immediately. Applied will implement FIN 46 during the first fiscal quarter of 2004 and the associated retirement costs.will consolidate Applied Ventures I (Ventures I) as a VIE. Applied does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 143, which will be effective for Applied's fiscal 2003,its implementation to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal For additional discussion of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," and APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions." SFAS No. 144 retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121 for: 1) recognition and measurementVentures I, see Note 3 of the impairment of long-lived assetsNotes to be held and used; and 2) measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. Applied does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 144, which will be effective for Applied's fiscal 2003, to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 eliminates SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item. Under SFAS No.145, such gains and losses should be classified as extraordinary only if they meet the criteria of APB Opinion No. 30. In addition, SFAS No. 145 amends SFAS No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. Applied does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 145, which will become effective at varying dates from May 2002 to Applied's fiscal 2003, to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and supersedes Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Applied does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 146 to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 2Financial Instruments
Investments

     Short-term investments by security type at October 26, 2003 were as follows:

                 
GrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedEstimated
CostGainsLossesFair Value




(In thousands)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions $657,475  $6,508  $458  $663,525 
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes  1,370,050   10,399   5,018   1,375,431 
Bank certificates of deposit  55,997         55,997 
U.S. Treasury and agency securities  1,312,695   2,708   1,300   1,314,103 
Other debt securities  713,532   7,395   1,634   719,293 
   
   
   
   
 
  $4,109,749  $27,010  $8,410  $4,128,349 
   
   
   
   
 

NOTE 239


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTSSTATEMENTS — (Continued)

Investments

Short-term investments by security type at October 27, 2002 were as follows:


                                                          Gross       Gross     Estimated
                                                        Unrealized  Unrealized    Fair
                                               Cost       Gains       Losses      Value
- ------------------------------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(In thousands)

Obligations of states and political
  subdivisions..........................     $802,145      $9,002      $2,418    $808,729
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds
  and medium-term notes.................      933,643      15,729       2,281     947,091
Bank certificates of deposit............      205,020          --          --     205,020
U.S. Treasury and agency securities.....    1,026,274       8,603         465   1,034,412
Other debt securities...................      633,069      16,813         399     649,483
- ------------------------------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                           $3,600,151     $50,147      $5,563  $3,644,735
- ------------------------------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Short-term investments by security type at October 28, 2001 were as follows:

                                                        Gross       Gross     Estimated
                                                      Unrealized  Unrealized    Fair
                                             Cost       Gains       Losses      Value
- ---------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(In thousands)

Obligations of states and political
  subdivisions..........................   $770,361      $8,762        $628    $778,495
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds
  and medium-term notes.................    714,391      14,200       4,105     724,486
Bank certificates of deposit............    514,719         536          --     515,255
U.S. Treasury and agency securities.....    818,997      16,224          --     835,221
Other debt securities...................    613,644      18,102         115     631,631
- ---------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                         $3,432,112     $57,824      $4,848  $3,485,088
- ---------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                 
GrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedEstimated
CostGainsLossesFair Value




(In thousands)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions $802,145  $9,002  $2,418  $808,729 
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes  933,643   15,729   2,281   947,091 
Bank certificates of deposit  205,020         205,020 
U.S. Treasury and agency securities  1,026,274   8,603   465   1,034,412 
Other debt securities  633,069   16,813   399   649,483 
   
   
   
   
 
  $3,600,151  $50,147  $5,563  $3,644,735 
   
   
   
   
 

Cash and cash equivalents included investments in debt and other securities of $473 million at October 28, 2001 and $542 million at October 27, 2002.2002 and $884 million at October 26, 2003.

Contractual maturities of short-term investments at October 27, 200226, 2003 were as follows:


                                                      Estimated
                                                        Fair
                                            Cost        Value
- ---------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
(In thousands)

Due in one year or less.............     $1,704,402  $1,704,811
Due after one through three years...      1,263,311   1,288,350
Due after three years...............        632,438     651,574
- ---------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
                                         $3,600,151  $3,644,735
- ---------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
         
Estimated
CostFair Value


(In thousands)
Due in one year or less $2,356,254  $2,358,217 
Due after one through three years  1,216,054   1,227,956 
Due after three years  537,441   542,176 
   
   
 
  $4,109,749  $4,128,349 
   
   
 

Gross realized gains and losses on sales of short-term investments were not material for fiscal 2000 or 2001.     For fiscal 2002, gross realized gains on sales of short-term investments were $27 million, and gross realized losses were not material. For fiscal 2003, gross realized gains on sales of short-term investments were $44 million, and gross realized losses were $8 million. Applied manages its cash equivalents and short-term investments as a single portfolio of highly marketable securities that is intended to be available to meet Applied'sApplied’s current cash requirements.

Derivative Financial Instruments Applied adopted SFAS No. 133 (SFAS 133) “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended, in the first fiscal quarter of 2001. SFAS No. 133 established new standards of accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, and requires that all derivatives, including foreign currency exchange contracts, be recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge treatment, as well as the ineffective portion of any hedges, must be recognized currently in earnings. All of Applied'sApplied’s derivative financial instruments are recorded at their fair value in other current assets or accounts payable and accrued expenses. The transition adjustment upon adoption of SFAS No. 133 was not material.

Applied conducts business in a number of foreign countries, with certain transactions denominated in local currencies, such as Japanese yen, the euro, Israeli shekel and British pounds.pound. The purpose of Applied'sApplied’s foreign currency management is to managemitigate the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated revenues, costs and eventual cash flows. The terms of currency instruments used for hedging purposes are generally consistent with the timing of the transactions being hedged.

Applied uses derivative financial instruments, such as forward exchange contracts and currency option contracts, to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions expected to occur within the next 12 months. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, these hedgesHedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of

40


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

the hedge as cash flow hedges, and are evaluated for effectiveness quarterly. The effective portion of the gain or loss on these hedges is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders'stockholders’ equity, and is reclassified into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. All such amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income at October 27, 200226, 2003 will be reclassified to earnings within 12 months. Changes in the fair value of currency option contracts due to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness, and are recognized in cost of products sold. The change in option time value was not material for fiscal 2001, 2002 or 2002.2003. If the transaction being hedged fails to occur, or if a portion of any derivative is ineffective, Applied immediately recognizes the gain or loss on the associated financial instrument in general and administrative expenses. The amountamounts recognized due to anticipated transactions failing to occur waswere not material for fiscal 2001 or 2002.all periods presented.

Forward exchange contracts are used to hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. These derivatives are not designated for SFAS No. 133 hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these hedges are recorded immediately in earnings to offset the changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.

Derivative-related activity in accumulated other comprehensive income was as follows:


                                          2001        2002
- -------------------------------------- ----------  ----------
(In thousands)

Unrealized gain, net, on derivative
  instruments at beginning of period...    $ --       $4,621
Increase in fair value of
  derivative instruments...............   78,398      13,264
Gains reclassified to earnings.........  (73,777)    (11,898)
- -------------------------------------- ----------  ----------
Unrealized gain, net, on derivative
  instruments at end of period.........   $4,621      $5,987
- -------------------------------------- ----------  ----------
         
20022003


(In thousands)
Unrealized gain, net, on derivative instruments at beginning of period $4,621  $5,987 
Increase in fair value of derivative instruments  13,264   4,700 
Gains reclassified to earnings, net  (11,898)  (8,758)
   
   
 
Unrealized gain, net, on derivative instruments at end of period $5,987  $1,929 
   
   
 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of Applied'sApplied’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes payable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate fair value due to the short maturities of these financial instruments. At October 28, 2001,27, 2002, the carrying amount of long-term debt including current portion, was $570 million, and the estimated fair value was $599 million. At October 27, 2002, the carrying amount was $583 million, and the estimated fair value was $633 million. At October 26, 2003, the carrying amount was $562 million, and the estimated fair value was $625 million. The estimated fair value of long-term debt is based primarily on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues.

41


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 3Balance Sheet Detail
         
20022003


(In thousands)
Inventories
        
Customer service spares $644,352  $480,770 
Raw materials  191,956   115,481 
Work-in-process  195,409   143,130 
Finished goods  242,099   211,311 
   
   
 
  $1,273,816  $950,692 
   
   
 
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
        
Land and improvements $253,322  $265,571 
Buildings and improvements  1,354,146   1,396,976 
Demonstration and manufacturing equipment  755,985   645,740 
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment  539,948   562,020 
Construction in progress  319,732   224,120 
   
   
 
Gross property, plant and equipment  3,223,133   3,094,427 
Accumulated depreciation  (1,458,196)  (1,534,597)
   
   
 
  $1,764,937  $1,559,830 
   
   
 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
        
Accounts payable $269,275  $258,416 
Compensation and employee benefits  255,231   168,993 
Installation and warranty  214,004   172,921 
Deferred revenue  117,827   204,980 
Restructuring  37,308   106,820 
Other  454,511   407,341 
   
   
 
  $1,348,156  $1,319,471 
   
   
 
Goodwill, Purchased Technology and Other Intangible Assets

     

NOTE 3  BALANCE SHEET DETAIL


                                                  2001        2002
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
(In thousands)

Inventories
Customer service spares......................   $566,282    $644,352
Raw materials................................    301,586     191,956
Work-in-process..............................    193,505     195,409
Finished goods...............................    351,624     242,099
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
                                              $1,412,997  $1,273,816
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Land and improvements........................   $217,649    $253,322
Buildings and improvements...................  1,255,032   1,354,146
Demonstration and manufacturing equipment....    737,706     755,985
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment......    456,669     539,948
Construction in progress.....................    348,531     319,732
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
Gross property, plant and equipment..........  3,015,587   3,223,133
Accumulated depreciation..................... (1,309,099) (1,458,196)
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
                                              $1,706,488  $1,764,937
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------

Other Assets
Purchased technology, net....................   $138,162    $112,920
Goodwill, net................................    111,302     202,290
Other........................................     90,384      71,825
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
                                                $339,848    $387,035
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable.............................   $248,592    $269,275
Compensation and employee benefits...........    208,333     255,231
Installation and warranty....................    254,504     214,004
Deferred revenue.............................    177,384     117,827
Other........................................    588,718     491,819
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
                                              $1,477,531  $1,348,156
- --------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------

Applied adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," in the first fiscal quarterDetails of 2002. SFAS No. 142 supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, "Intangible Assets," and discontinues the amortization of goodwill. In addition, SFAS No. 142 includes provisions regarding: 1) the reclassification between goodwill and identifiableunamortized intangible assets, in accordance with the new definition of intangible assets set forth in SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations;" 2) the reassessment of the useful lives of existing recognized intangibles; and 3) the testing for impairmentwhich consisted solely of goodwill, and other intangibles.

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, beginning October 29, 2001, goodwill is no longer amortized, but is reviewed periodically for impairment. Applied completed the first step of the transitional goodwill impairment test at the beginning of fiscal 2002, and completed the annual goodwill impairment test at the end of fiscal 2002, which did not indicate impairment. Under the new definition of intangible assets, Applied identified $9 million of net intangibles that were reclassified from previously reported goodwill to other intangible assets. Net goodwill increased by $91 million during fiscal 2002 due to $100 million of goodwill acquired, net of adjustments, offset by the $9 million of intangible assets reclassified out of goodwill in the first fiscal quarter of 2002. Purchased technology and other intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of three to 10 years using the straight-line method. No changes were made to the useful lives of amortizable intangibles in connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 142.

Components of intangible assets were as follows:


                                          2001                           2002
                             -----------------------------  -----------------------------
                             Gross Carrying   Accumulated   Gross Carrying   Accumulated
                                 Amount      Amortization       Amount      Amortization
- ---------------------------- --------------  -------------  --------------  -------------
(In thousands)

Amortized intangible assets:
  Purchased technology...         $290,572       $152,410        $312,529       $199,609
  Other..................           12,000          1,800          23,600          7,390
- ---------------------------- --------------  -------------  --------------  -------------
                                  $302,572       $154,210        $336,129       $206,999
- ---------------------------- --------------  -------------  --------------  -------------
Unamortized intangible assets:
  Goodwill...............         $159,492        $48,190        $248,160        $45,870
- ---------------------------- --------------  -------------  --------------  -------------
         
20022003


(in thousands)
Gross carrying amount $248,160  $269,391 
Accumulated amortization  (45,870)  (45,870)
   
   
 
  $202,290  $223,521 
   
   
 

Aggregate amortization expense was $65 million for fiscal 2000, $70 million for fiscal 2001 and $52 million for fiscal 2002.     In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” as of the beginning of fiscal 2002, goodwill is no longer amortized. To facilitate comparison with prior periods, ifamortized but reviewed annually during the fourth fiscal quarter for impairment. Applied conducted goodwill hadimpairment tests in fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003, and the results of these tests indicated that Applied’s goodwill assets were not beenimpaired. From October 27, 2002 to October 26, 2003, the change in goodwill was $21 million, which primarily consisted of $18 million for the acquisition of

42


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Boxer Cross, Inc. and a $3 million adjustment to the purchase price for an acquisition containing contingent purchase price provisions. For additional details, see Note 12 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Details of amortized net income would have increased by $15intangible assets were as follows:

                         
20022003


OtherOther
PurchasedIntangiblePurchasedIntangible
TechnologyAssetsTotalTechnologyAssetsTotal






(in thousands)
Gross carrying amount $312,529  $23,600  $336,129  $324,193  $23,600  $347,793 
Accumulated amortization  (199,609)  (7,390)  (206,999)  (244,331)  (10,950)  (255,281)
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
  $112,920  $16,210  $129,130  $79,862  $12,650  $92,512 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

Purchased technology and other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of five to 10 years using the straight-line method. Aggregate amortization expense was $52 million or $0.01 per diluted share,and $48 million for the fiscal 2000,2002 and $14 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, for fiscal 2001.2003, respectively. As of October 27, 2002,26, 2003, future estimated amortization expense is expected to be: $48 million for fiscal 2003, $47be $49 million for fiscal 2004, $18$20 million for fiscal 2005, $12$14 million for fiscal 2006, and$5 million for fiscal 2007, $3 million for fiscal 2007.

During fiscal 2001, Applied established a venture capital fund, 2008 and $2 million thereafter.

Applied Materials Venture Capital Fund

     Ventures I L.P. (Ventures I), to investinvests in privately-held, early-stage companies engaged in developing communicationssystems, components systems and sub-systems.devices based on nanotechnology for specific applications and products. Ventures I is a limited partnership with Applied as the sole limited partner and an independent party as the general partner. As provided for in the partnership agreement, the general partner has control over the investment decisions and operations of Ventures I. Accordingly, Applied accounts for its investment in Ventures I using the equity method. Applied has committed to fund $50 million in capital contributions, but has reserved the option to discontinue capital contributions at $25 million. At October 27, 2002, Applied'sApplied’s capital contributions to Ventures I totaled approximately $9 million $6through October 27, 2002 and $16 million through October 26, 2003. As provided for in the partnership agreement, the general partner has control over investment decisions and operations of which was recorded in Other Assets,Ventures I. Accordingly, Applied accounts for its investment using the equity method. Capital contributions, net of Applied'sthe pro rata share of Venture I'sVentures I’s results of operations.operations, have been included in other assets and totaled $6 million at October 27, 2002 and $11 million at October 26, 2003.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46 which provides guidance on the identification, classification and accounting of variable interest entities. Applied has determined that Ventures I qualifies for consolidation as a variable interest entity under FIN 46. Applied will implement FIN 46 by consolidating Ventures I during the first fiscal quarter of 2004 in accordance with the effective date of FIN 46, as amended. Applied does not expect its investment inthe consolidation of Ventures I to have a material effectimpact on its financial condition or results of operations.

Note 4Notes Payable

     

NOTE 4   NOTES PAYABLE

Applied has credit facilities for unsecured borrowings in various currencies up to approximately $666$674 million, of which $500 million is comprised of two revolving credit agreements in the U.S. with a group of banks. Both agreements expireOne agreement is a $250 million line of credit that expires in March 2003.September 2004, and is expected to be renewed, and the other is a $250 million line of credit that expires in September 2006. The agreements provide for borrowings at various rates, including the lead bank'sbank’s prime reference rate, and include financial and other covenants with which Applied was in compliance at October 27, 2002.26, 2003. No amounts were outstanding under these agreements at the end of fiscal 2001 or 2002.2003. The remaining credit facilities of approximately $166$174 million are primarily with Japanese banks at rates indexed to their prime reference rate. No amounts were outstanding under these

43


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Japanese credit facilities at October 28, 2001.26, 2003. At October 27, 2002, $40 million was outstanding under Japanese credit facilities at an average annual interest rate of 0.30 percent.

Note 5Long-Term Debt

     

NOTE 5    LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt outstanding was as follows:


                                                           2001       2002
- ------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)

Japanese debt, 3.00%-4.85%, maturing 2004-2011..........  $26,612    $21,102
Israeli note, variable interest rate, maturing in 2006..       --     19,204
6.70-7.00% medium-term notes due 2005,
    interest payable March 15 and September 15..........   43,000     43,000
8.00% unsecured senior notes due 2004,
    interest payable March 1 and September 1............  100,000    100,000
6.75% unsecured senior notes due 2007,
    interest payable April 15 and October 15............  200,000    200,000
7.125% unsecured senior notes due 2017,
    interest payable April 15 and October 15............  200,000    200,000
- ------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------
                                                          569,612    583,306
Current portion.........................................   (4,807)    (9,453)
- ------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------
                                                         $564,805   $573,853
- ------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------
         
20022003


(In thousands)
Japanese debt, 3.00%-4.85%, maturing 2004-2011 $21,102  $18,714 
Israeli note, variable interest rate, maturing in 2006  19,204    
6.70-7.00% medium-term notes due 2005, interest payable March 15 and September 15  43,000   43,000 
8.00% unsecured senior notes due 2004, interest payable March 1 and September 1  100,000   100,000 
6.75% unsecured senior notes due 2007, interest payable April 15 and October 15  200,000   200,000 
7.125% unsecured senior notes due 2017, interest payable April 15 and October 15  200,000   200,000 
   
   
 
   583,306   561,714 
Current portion  (9,453)  (105,292)
   
   
 
  $573,853  $456,422 
   
   
 

At October 27, 2002, $2126, 2003, $19 million of Japanese debt was collateralized by property and equipment with a net book value of $46 million.

Applied has debt agreements that contain financial and other covenants. These covenants place restrictions on additional borrowings by U.S. subsidiaries ofrequire Applied liens against Applied's assets andto maintain certain sale and leaseback transactions.minimum financial ratios. At October 27, 2002,26, 2003, Applied was in compliance with all covenants.

Aggregate debt maturities at October 27, 200226, 2003 were: $9 million in fiscal 2003; $109$105 million in fiscal 2004; $50$46 million in fiscal 2005; $7$2 million in fiscal 2006; $202 million in fiscal 2007; $2 million in fiscal 2008; and $206$205 million thereafter.

Note 6Restructuring, Asset Impairments and Other Charges

     

NOTE 6   NON-RECURRING ITEMS

Non-recurring operating expense itemsRestructuring, asset impairments and other charges included the following:


Fiscal year ended                          2000       2001       2002
- --------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)

Acquired in-process research
             
Fiscal year200120022003




(In thousands)
Restructuring and asset impairment charges $211,164  $77,479  $371,754 
Acquired in-process research and development expense  10,000   8,000    
   
   
   
 
  $221,164  $85,479  $371,754 
   
   
   
 

     Restructuring, asset impairments and development expense.................. $ -- $10,000 $8,000 Restructuring charges.................. -- 211,164 77,479 Acquisition expenses................... 40,000 -- -- - --------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- $40,000 $221,164 $85,479 - --------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Acquired In-Process Research and Development Expense  Duringother charges for fiscal 2001 Applied recordedtotaled $221 million, consisting of a charge of $10 million offor acquired in-process research and development expense, in connection with its acquisitionand restructuring and asset impairment charges of Oramir Semiconductor Equipment Ltd. (Oramir). During fiscal 2002, Applied recorded acquired in-process research$211 million. The restructuring and development expense of $6 million in connection with its acquisition of the assets of Schlumberger's electron-beam wafer inspection business and $2 million in connection with its acquisition of Global Knowledge Services, Inc. (GKS). For further details regarding these acquisitions, see Note 13.

Restructuring Charges  During fiscal 2001, Applied recorded pre-tax restructuringasset impairment charges of $211 million consistingconsisted of $105 million for headcount reductions, $45 million for consolidation of facilities and $61 million for other costs, primarily fixed asset write-offs. These restructuring actions occurred in Applied's second, third and fourth fiscal quarters, and were takenwriteoffs due to align Applied's cost structure with prevailing market conditions. Duringfacility consolidation. As of October 26, 2003, the second fiscal quarter of 2001, Applied completed a voluntary separation plan that resulted in a headcount reduction of approximately 1,000 employees, or three percent of its global workforce, for a cost of $47 million. During the third fiscal quarter of 2001, Applied recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $4 million associated with severance and benefit costs. During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001, Applied eliminated approximately 2,000 additional positions, or 10 percent of its global workforce, for a cost of $54 million. The majority of the affected employees were based in Santa Clara, California and Austin, Texas, and represented multiple company activities and functions.

Total cash outlays for fiscal 2001 restructuring activities were $137actions have been completed.

44


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Restructuring, asset impairments and other charges for fiscal 2002 totaled $85 million, consisting of a charge of $8 million for acquired in-process research and occurred during fiscal 2001development expense, and fiscal 2002. The remaining $74 million of restructuring costs consisted of non-cashand asset impairment charges of $62 million for$77 million. The restructuring and asset write-offs and other costs and $12 million of compensation expense for accelerated vesting of certain stock options.

During the first fiscal quarter of 2002, Applied recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $77 million, consistingimpairment charges consisted of $39 million for headcount reductions, $16 million for consolidation of facilities and $22 million for other costs, primarily fixed asset write-offs. Thiswriteoffs due to facility consolidation. As of October 26, 2003, the majority of the fiscal 2002 restructuring action wasactions have been completed.

     Restructuring and asset impairment charges for fiscal 2003 totaled $372 million, consisting of $186 million for headcount reductions, $86 million for consolidation of facilities and $100 million for other costs, primarily fixed asset writeoffs due to facility consolidation. The fiscal 2003 restructuring activities are expected to be completed during early 2004, which will result in additional costs.

     The restructuring actions in fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003 were taken to better align Applied'sApplied’s cost structure with prevailing market conditions due to the prolonged industry downturn, anddownturn. These actions, which were necessary as a result of reduced Applied'sbusiness volume, reduced Applied’s global workforce by approximately 1,100 employees, or six percent. The majority of the affected employees were basedand consolidated Applied’s global facilities.

Changes in Santa Clara, California and Austin, Texas, and represented multiple company activities and functions. The restructuring charge of $77 million consisted of $49 million of cash outlays, the majority of which occurred inreserves for fiscal 2002 and $28 million of non-cash charges, primarily for fixed asset write-offs.

At October 27, 2002, the remaining restructuring reserve consisted of $29 million related to the restructuring implemented in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001 and $8 million related to the restructuring implemented in the first fiscal quarter of 2002.

Restructuring activity for fiscal 2001 and 2002 was2003 were as follows:


                                     Severance
                                    and Benefits   Facilities    Other     Total
- ----------------------------------- ------------  ----------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)

Provision for fiscal 2001.......       $104,943      $45,223    $60,998   $211,164
Cash paid.......................        (50,343)      (4,807)    (1,200)   (56,350)
Non-cash charges................        (11,900)      (2,516)   (46,998)   (61,414)
- ----------------------------------- ------------  ----------- ---------- ----------
Balance, October 28, 2001.......         42,700       37,900     12,800     93,400
Provision for fiscal 2002.......         38,946       15,928     22,605     77,479
Cash paid.......................        (79,653)     (17,379)   (11,400)  (108,432)
Non-cash charges................             --       (4,434)   (20,705)   (25,139)
- ----------------------------------- ------------  ----------- ---------- ----------
Balance, October 27, 2002.......         $1,993      $32,015     $3,300    $37,308
- ----------------------------------- ------------  ----------- ---------- ----------

Acquisition Expenses  During fiscal 2000, Applied recorded $40 million of pre-tax, operating expenses in connection with its acquisition of Etec Systems, Inc. (Etec).

                 
Severance
and BenefitsFacilitiesOtherTotal




(In thousands)
Balance, October 28, 2001 $42,700  $37,900  $12,800  $93,400 
Provision for fiscal 2002  38,946   15,928   22,605   77,479 
Cash paid  (79,653)  (17,379)  (11,400)  (108,432)
Non-cash charges     (4,434)  (20,705)  (25,139)
   
   
   
   
 
Balance, October 27, 2002  1,993   32,015   3,300   37,308 
Provision for fiscal 2003  185,733   86,105   99,916   371,754 
Cash paid  (175,789)  (26,276)  (43,768)  (245,833)
Non-cash charges     (1,949)  (54,460)  (56,409)
   
   
   
   
 
Balance, October 26, 2003 $11,937  $89,895  $4,988  $106,820 
   
   
   
   
 
Note 7Stockholders’ Equity

     

NOTE 7   NON-RECURRING INCOME

During the first fiscal quarter of 1999, subsequent to the original maturity date of a note receivable from ASM International N.V. (ASMI) and in accordance with a restructured litigation settlement agreement, Applied received a $20 million payment from ASMI and recorded the amount as non-recurring income. During the fourth fiscal quarter of 1999, Applied received another payment from ASMI of $10 million and also recorded the amount as non-recurring income.

During the second fiscal quarter of 2000, Applied recorded an additional $68 million of pre-tax, non-operating income related to the ASMI litigation settlement. This amount consisted of: 1) the final cash payment of $35 million related to the outstanding note receivable; and 2) a net gain of $33 million on the exercise of ASMI warrants and subsequent sale of the resulting shares.

NOTE 8   STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Stock Split On March 21, 2002, Applied'sApplied’s Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split of Applied'sApplied’s common stock, which was distributed in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend on or about April 16, 2002 to stockholders of record as of April 1, 2002. All prior period common stock and applicable share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect this stock dividend.

Comprehensive Income See the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity for the components of comprehensive income. Accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of the following components:


                                       2001      2002
- ----------------------------------- --------- ---------
(In thousands)

Unrealized gain on investments..     $57,748   $41,257
Unrealized gain on derivative
  instruments qualifying as
  cash flow hedges..............       4,621     5,987
Cumulative translation
  adjustments...................     (37,924)  (28,635)
- ----------------------------------- --------- ---------
                                     $24,445   $18,609
- ----------------------------------- --------- ---------
         
20022003


(In thousands)
Unrealized gain on investments $41,257  $24,092 
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges  5,987   1,929 
Cumulative translation adjustments  (28,635)  (9,638)
   
   
 
  $18,609  $16,383 
   
   
 

45


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Stock Repurchase Program Since March 1996, Applied has systematically repurchased shares of its common stock in the open market to partially fund its stock-based employee benefit and incentive plans. Upon the expiration of the previous authorization on March 22, 2001, the Board of Directors extended the share repurchase program and authorized the repurchase of up to $2.0 billion of Applied'sApplied’s common stock in the open market over the succeeding three years. In fiscal 2000, there were 6,390,000 shares repurchased at an average price of $27.72 per share. In fiscal 2001, there were 18,970,000 shares repurchased at an average price of $19.58 per share. In fiscal 2002, there were 6,795,000 shares repurchased at an average price of $18.40 per share.

In fiscal 2003, there were 15,588,000 shares repurchased at an average price of $16.03 per share.
Note 8Employee Benefit Plans

     

NOTE 9   EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Stock Options Applied grants options to employees and non-employee directors to purchase shares of its common stock, at future dates, at the fair market value on the date of grant. Options generally vest over one to four years, and generally expire no later than seven years from the date of grant. There were 73,930,00083,946,000 shares available for grant at October 29, 2000, 83,946,000 at October 28, 2001, and 96,874,000 at October 27, 2002.2002 and 74,793,000 at October 26, 2003. Stock option activity was as follows:


                                             2000                2001               2002
                                     ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
                                               Weighted            Weighted            Weighted
                                                Average             Average             Average
                                               Exercise            Exercise            Exercise
                                      Shares     Price    Shares     Price    Shares     Price
- ------------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Outstanding, beginning of year......  218,748     $8.79   243,994    $13.98   301,274    $15.57
Granted and assumed.................   73,216    $24.67    93,032    $18.10     8,802    $20.92
Exercised...........................  (41,698)    $5.40   (21,280)    $6.21   (19,156)    $6.82
Canceled............................   (6,272)   $12.11   (14,472)   $19.23   (22,358)   $20.06
- ------------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Outstanding, end of year............  243,994    $13.98   301,274    $15.57   268,562    $16.00
- ------------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Exercisable, end of year............   72,354     $6.18    92,468     $8.29   114,188    $11.10
- ------------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
                         
200120022003



WeightedWeightedWeighted
AverageAverageAverage
ExerciseExerciseExercise
SharesPriceSharesPriceSharesPrice






(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Outstanding, beginning of year  243,994  $13.98   301,274  $15.57   268,562  $16.00 
Granted and assumed  93,032  $18.10   8,802  $20.92   52,407  $13.61 
Exercised  (21,280) $6.21   (19,156) $6.82   (38,480) $6.67 
Canceled  (14,472) $19.23   (22,358) $20.06   (30,454) $18.96 
   
       
       
     
Outstanding, end of year  301,274  $15.57   268,562  $16.00   252,035  $16.56 
   
       
       
     
Exercisable, end of year  92,468  $8.29   114,188  $11.10   117,491  $15.94 

The following table summarizes information with respect to options outstanding and exercisable at October 27, 2002:


                            Options Outstanding              Options Exercisable
                  --------------------------------------  -------------------------
                                              Weighted
                                               Average
                                  Weighted    Remaining                   Weighted
                      Number       Average   Contractual      Number      Average
     Range of       of Shares     Exercise      Life        of Shares     Exercise
 exercise prices  (In thousands)    Price    (In years)   (In thousands)   Price
- ----------------- -------------- ----------- -----------  -------------- ----------

 $0.01 -   $4.99         16,326       $3.57         1.0          16,321      $3.57
 $5.00 -   $9.99         65,505       $7.35         2.4          63,676      $7.37
$10.00 -  $19.99        109,613      $17.51         5.1          21,425     $17.08
$20.00 -  $29.99         66,275      $21.58         5.2           7,253     $24.11
$30.00 -  $59.99         10,843      $37.56         4.6           5,513     $37.83
- ----------------- -------------- ----------- -----------  -------------- ----------
                        268,562      $16.00         4.2         114,188     $11.10
- ----------------- -------------- ----------- -----------  -------------- ----------
26, 2003:
                     
Options OutstandingOptions Exercisable


WeightedWeighted
AverageWeighted AverageAverage
NumberExerciseRemainingNumberExercise
Range of exercise pricesof SharesPriceContractual Lifeof SharesPrice






(In thousands)(In years)(In thousands)
$ 0.01 - $ 4.99  2,353  $3.74   0.7   2,343  $3.75 
$ 5.00 - $ 9.99  44,162  $7.36   1.5   44,087  $7.36 
$10.00 - $19.99  138,963  $16.17   4.9   36,845  $17.7 
$20.00 - $29.99  56,851  $21.59   4.0   25,851  $21.97 
$30.00 - $59.99  9,706  $37.62   3.1   8,365  $37.92 
   
           
     
   252,035  $16.56   4.0   117,491  $15.94 
   
           
     

EmployeeEmployees’ Stock Purchase Plan Applied sponsors two employeeemployees’ stock purchase plans (ESPP) for the benefit of U.S. and international employees. The U.S. plan is qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase Applied'sApplied’s common stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning of the offering period or at the end of each applicable purchase period. Beginning in December 2002, Applied amended the

46


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

ESPP to extend the offering period from six months to 24 months composed of four six-month offering period. Stock purchases under thepurchase periods. ESPP contributions are limited to a maximum of 10 percent of an employee'semployee’s eligible compensation, up to a maximum of $12,750, in any plan year.$6,500, per six-month purchase period. ESPP participants are also limited to purchasing a maximum of 1,000 shares per purchase period. Shares issued under the ESPP were 3,168,000 for fiscal 2000, 4,306,000 for fiscal 2001, and 4,127,000 for fiscal 2002.2002 and 6,212,000 for fiscal 2003. At October 27, 2002,26, 2003, there were 31,135,00024,923,000 shares reserved for future issuance under the ESPP.

Stock-Based Compensation See Note 1 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Restricted Stock During fiscal 2003, Applied has adoptedissued 307,500 shares of restricted stock to two individuals, which consisted principally of an initial compensation package for Applied’s new President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO). On May 20, 2003, Applied issued 300,000 shares of restricted common stock at $0.01 per share to the disclosure-only provisionsnew President and CEO. The closing market price of SFAS No. 123. Accordingly, noApplied’s common stock was $13.76 per share on May 20, 2003. One half of the shares vested on October 1, 2003, with the remaining shares vesting on October 1, 2004. The stock is subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to vesting. Deferred compensation was charged for the difference between the market value of the restricted shares and the sales price, and was presented as a reduction of stockholders’ equity in Applied’s consolidated balance sheet. Deferred compensation is amortized as compensation expense has beenover the vesting period. During fiscal 2003, Applied recognized for Applied'sgeneral and administrative expenses of approximately $2.7 million in amortization expense related to restricted stock option and purchase plan activity. The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Applied's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options; therefore, the Black-Scholes option pricing model may not provide a reliable measure of the fair value of Applied's options. If compensation expense had been determined based on the grant date fair value as computed under the Black-Scholes option pricing model for awards in fiscal 2000, 2001 and 2002 in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Applied's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:


Fiscal year ended                              2000        2001        2002
- ------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Net income as reported..................... $2,063,552    $507,829    $269,004
Pro forma net income/(loss)................ $1,900,735    $290,825    ($47,695)
Earnings per share as reported:
    Basic..................................      $1.28       $0.31       $0.16
    Diluted................................      $1.20       $0.30       $0.16
Pro forma earnings/(loss) per share:
    Basic..................................      $1.18       $0.18      ($0.03)
    Diluted................................      $1.11       $0.17      ($0.03)
- ------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
issuances.

Based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the weighted average estimated fair value of employee stock option grants was $13.05 for fiscal 2000, $8.98 for fiscal 2001 and $10.87 for fiscal 2002. The weighted average estimated fair value of purchase rights granted under the ESPP was $5.61 for fiscal 2000, $6.26 for fiscal 2001 and $6.29 for fiscal 2002. In calculating pro forma compensation, the fair value of each stock option grant and stock purchase right is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following weighted average assumptions:


                                 Stock Options                   ESPP
                          --------------------------  --------------------------
                            2000     2001     2002      2000     2001     2002
- ------------------------- -------- -------- --------  -------- -------- --------

Dividend yield............  None     None     None      None     None     None
Expected volatility.......     63%      67%      69%       63%      67%      69%
Risk-free interest rate...   6.00%    3.94%    3.58%     5.40%    5.52%    2.42%
Expected life (in years)..    3.9      3.4      3.6       0.5      0.5      0.5
- ------------------------- -------- -------- --------  -------- -------- --------

Employee Bonus Plans Applied has various employee bonus plans. A profit sharing plan provides for the distribution of a percentage of pre-tax profits to substantially all Applied employees not eligible for other performance-based incentive plans, up to a maximum percentage of compensation. Other plans award annual bonuses to Applied'sApplied’s executives and key contributors based on the achievement of profitability and other specific performance criteria. Applied also has agreements with key technical employees that provide for additional compensation related to the success of new product development and achievement of specified profitability criteria. Charges to expense under these plans were $286 million for fiscal 2000, $56 million for fiscal 2001, and $99 million for fiscal 2002.2002 and not material for fiscal 2003.

Employee Savings and Retirement Plan The Employee Savings and Retirement Plan is qualified under Sections 401(a) and (k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Applied contributes a percentage of each participating employee'semployee’s salary deferral contributions. CompanyThese matching contributions are invested in Applied's common stock and become 20 percent vested at the end of an employee'semployee’s second year of service with Applied, and vest 20 percent per year of service thereafter until becoming fully vested at the end of six years of service. Prior to January 1, 2002, company matching contributions began vestingvested beginning at the end of an employee'semployee’s third year of service and became fully vested at the end of seven years of service. Applied'sEffective January 1, 2004, each participant may elect to have his or her Company matching contributions in any of the diversified investment funds available under the plan or in Applied’s common stock. Applied’s matching contributions under this plan were $21 million for fiscal 2000, $31 million for fiscal 2001, and $27 million for fiscal 2002, and $13 million, net of $12 million in forfeitures for fiscal 2003. Forfeitures were not material for fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2002.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans of Foreign Subsidiaries Several of Applied'sApplied’s foreign subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of their eligible employees. Benefits under these plans are based on years of service and final average compensation levels. Applied has funded its plans in accordance with the terms of the plans and local statutory requirements, which differ for each of the countries in which the subsidiaries are located. Expenses under these plans, consisting principally of service cost, were $10 million for fiscal 2000, $12 million for fiscal 2001, and $16 million for fiscal 2002.2002 and $18 million for fiscal 2003. At October 27, 2002,26, 2003, the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation was $84$102 million, the projected benefit obligation was $111$123 million, and the fair value of plan assets was $29$33 million. The difference between the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation and aggregate plan assets has been recorded as a liability by Applied.

47


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Post-Retirement Benefits On January 1, 1999, Applied adopted a plan that provides medical and vision benefits to retirees who are at least age 55 and whose age plus years of service is at least 65 at date of retirement. An eligible retiree may elect coverage for a spouse or domestic partner under the age of 65. Coverage under the plan generally ends for both the retiree and spouse or domestic partner upon reaching age 65. This plan has not had, and is not expected to have, a material effect on Applied'sApplied’s financial condition or results of operations.

Note 9Income Taxes

     

NOTE 10    INCOME TAXES

The components of incomeincome/(loss) from operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle were as follows:


Fiscal year ended                                   2000        2001        2002
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(In thousands)

U.S............................................ $2,557,471    $775,029    $131,818
Foreign........................................    390,373     328,773     208,693
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                $2,947,844  $1,103,802    $340,511
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
             
Fiscal year200120022003




(In thousands)
U.S.  $775,029  $131,818  $(345,081)
Foreign  328,773   208,693   133,525 
   
   
   
 
  $1,103,802  $340,511  $(211,556)
   
   
   
 

The components of the provision forfor/(benefit from) income taxes were as follows:


Fiscal year ended                                   2000        2001        2002
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(In thousands)

Current:
    U.S........................................   $895,539    $136,412     ($4,781)
    Foreign....................................    122,304      91,708      80,406
    State......................................     74,321      12,224      (3,957)
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                 1,092,164     240,344      71,668
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Deferred:
    U.S........................................   (187,557)     89,051     (21,002)
    Foreign....................................     (7,845)       (203)     15,157
    State......................................    (12,470)       (618)      5,684
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                  (207,872)     88,230        (161)
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                  $884,292    $328,574     $71,507
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
              
Fiscal year200120022003




(In thousands)
Current:            
 U.S.  $136,412  $(4,781) $(45,765)
 Foreign  91,708   80,406   55,204 
 State  12,224   (3,957)  8,646 
   
   
   
 
   240,344   71,668   18,085 
   
   
   
 
Deferred:            
 U.S.   89,051   (21,002)  (76,804)
 Foreign  (203)  15,157   2,929 
 State  (618)  5,684   (6,619)
   
   
   
 
   88,230   (161)  (80,494)
   
   
   
 
  $328,574  $71,507  $(62,409)
   
   
   
 

A reconciliation between the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35 percent and Applied'sApplied’s actual effective income tax provision/(benefit) rate is as follows:


Fiscal year ended                                   2000        2001        2002
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate...........       35.0%       35.0%       35.0%
Non-tax deductible acquired in-process
  research and development expense.............         --         0.3          --
Effect of foreign operations taxed at
  various rates................................       (0.6)       (1.6)       (4.0)
State income taxes, net of federal benefit.....        1.4         0.7         0.3
Research and other tax credits.................       (1.5)       (2.3)       (0.4)
Foreign Sales Corporation benefit..............       (4.2)       (2.9)      (11.2)
Other..........................................       (0.1)        0.6         1.3
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                      30.0%       29.8%       21.0%
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
             
Fiscal year200120022003




Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate  35.0%  35.0%  (35.0)%
Effect of foreign operations taxed at various rates  (1.6)  (4.0)  5.8 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit  0.7   0.3   0.6 
Research and other tax credits  (2.3)  (0.4)   
Export sales benefit  (2.9)  (11.2)  (4.2)
Other  0.9   1.3   3.3 
   
   
   
 
   29.8%  21.0%  (29.5)%
   
   
   
 

Applied's48


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Applied’s effective income tax rate decreased significantly from fiscal 2001 towas lower in fiscal 2002 due primarily to significant Foreign Sales Corporation and extraterritorial income tax benefits.benefits, which resulted from an increase in Foreign Sales Corporation and extraterritorial qualified income.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.

The components of net deferred income tax assets were as follows:


                                                    2001        2002
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
(In thousands)

Current deferred income tax assets, net:
    Inventory reserves and basis difference....   $173,687    $155,185
    Warranty and installation reserves.........     85,160      79,371
    Accrued liabilities........................    219,912     289,331
    Restructuring accrual......................     53,501      28,588
    Other......................................     19,525      13,461
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
                                                   551,785     565,936
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
Non-current deferred income tax assets, net:
    Depreciation...............................      9,237          --
    Purchased technology.......................    (20,850)         --
    Other......................................     25,153          --
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
                                                    13,540          --
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
Deferred income tax liabilities, net:
    Depreciation...............................         --     (23,563)
    Purchased technology.......................         --     (19,900)
    Other......................................         --      35,946
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
                                                        --      (7,517)
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
                                                  $565,325    $558,419
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -----------
          
20022003


(In thousands)
Current deferred income tax assets, net:        
 Inventory reserves and basis difference $155,185  $95,892 
 Installation and warranty reserves  79,371   50,855 
 Accrued liabilities  217,943   222,018 
 Restructuring reserves  28,588   49,256 
 Loss carryforwards     236,178 
 Tax credit carryforwards  84,849   128,624 
   
   
 
   565,936   782,823 
   
   
 
Deferred income tax liabilities, net:        
 Depreciation  (23,563)  (21,984)
 Purchased technology  (19,900)  (14,317)
 Other  35,946   21,031 
   
   
 
   (7,517)  (15,270)
   
   
 
  $558,419  $767,553 
   
   
 

U.S. income taxes have not been provided for approximately $252$291 million of cumulative undistributed earnings of several non-U.S. subsidiaries. Applied intends to reinvest these earnings indefinitely in operations outside of the U.S.

     At October 26, 2003, Applied’s federal and state net operating loss carryforwards for tax return purposes was $642 million and $174 million, respectively. Management believes that net operating losses will be utilized in future periods. If not utilized, the federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in fiscal 2023 and the state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in fiscal 2008. As of October 26, 2003, Applied’s federal tax credit carryforwards for tax return purposes were $97 million. If not utilized, the federal tax credit carryforwards will begin to expire in fiscal 2006.

Applied’s income taxes payable have been reduced, and deferred tax assets have been increased, by the tax benefits associated with employee stock option transactions. These benefits, credited directly to stockholders’ equity, amounted to $75 million for fiscal 2002 and $124 million for fiscal 2003. Benefits reducing taxes payable amounted to $75 million for fiscal 2002, and benefits increasing deferred tax assets amounted to $124 million for fiscal 2003.

Note 10Industry Segment and Foreign Operations

     

NOTE 11    INDUSTRY SEGMENT AND FOREIGN OPERATIONS

Applied operates in one segment for the manufacture, marketing and servicing of semiconductor waferintegrated circuit fabrication equipment. In accordance with SFAS No. 131 "Disclosures(SFAS 131), “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," Applied's” Applied’s chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the GlobalPresident and Chief Executive Committee, whichOfficer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating

49


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

resources and assessing performance for the entire company. All material operating units qualify for aggregation under SFAS No. 131 due to their identical customer base and similarities in: economic characteristics; nature of products and services; and procurement, manufacturing and distribution processes. Since Applied operates in one segment and in one group of similar products and services, all financial segment and product line information required by SFAS No. 131 can be found in the consolidated financial statements.

No individual customer accounted for more than 10 percent of Applied's net sales for fiscal 2000. Intel Corporation accounted for 12.2 percent of Applied's net sales for fiscal 2001 and 10.1 percent of Applied's net sales for fiscal 2002.

For geographical reporting, revenues are attributed to the geographic location in which the customer iscustomers’ facilities are located. Long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant and equipment, and are attributed to the geographic location in which they are located.

Net sales and long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows:

          
Long-lived
Net SalesAssets


(In thousands)
2001:        
 North America* $2,130,739  $1,450,344 
 Taiwan  1,109,370   53,347 
 Japan  1,875,992   124,653 
 Europe  1,084,945   126,219 
 Korea  448,864   23,116 
 Asia-Pacific**  693,338   19,193 
   
   
 
  $7,343,248  $1,796,872 
   
   
 
2002:        
 North America* $1,327,886  $1,497,247 
 Taiwan  1,238,504   41,497 
 Japan  756,700   107,424 
 Europe  660,042   119,105 
 Korea  443,099   21,298 
 Asia-Pacific**  636,081   33,981 
   
   
 
  $5,062,312  $1,820,552 
   
   
 
2003:        
 North America* $1,179,131  $1,341,485 
 Taiwan  583,439   41,064 
 Japan  827,193   92,830 
 Europe  695,085   95,818 
 Korea  665,502   20,125 
 Asia-Pacific**  526,941   33,494 
   
   
 
  $4,477,291  $1,624,816 
   
   
 


Primarily the United States.

** Includes China.

     Net Long-lived Sales Assets - ------------------------- ----------- ----------- (In thousands) 2000: North America*.... $2,597,934 $1,091,922 Taiwan............ 2,317,484 56,784 Japan............. 1,508,556 139,380 Europe............ 1,430,318 102,593 Korea............. 868,489 24,745 Asia-Pacific**.... 841,631 6,495 - ------------------------- ----------- ----------- $9,564,412 $1,421,919 - ------------------------- ----------- ----------- 2001: North America*.... $2,130,739 $1,450,344 Taiwan............ 1,109,370 53,347 Japan............. 1,875,992 124,653 Europe............ 1,084,945 126,219 Korea............. 448,864 23,116 Asia-Pacific**.... 693,338 19,193 - ------------------------- ----------- ----------- $7,343,248 $1,796,872 - ------------------------- ----------- ----------- 2002: North America*.... $1,327,886 $1,497,247 Taiwan............ 1,238,504 41,497 Japan............. 756,700 107,424 Europe............ 660,042 119,105 Korea............. 443,099 21,298 Asia-Pacific**.... 636,081 33,981 - ------------------------- ----------- ----------- $5,062,312 $1,820,552 - ------------------------- ----------- -----------

sales to Intel Corporation represented 12 percent of Applied’s fiscal 2001 net sales, and 10 percent of Applied’s fiscal 2002 net sales. During fiscal 2003, two customers individually accounted for more than

*     Primarily the United States.
**   Includes China. 50


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

10 percent of net sales: net sales to Intel Corporation represented 13 percent of Applied’s net sales; and net sales to Samsung America, Inc. represented 12 percent of Applied’s net sales.

Note 11Commitments and Contingencies
Leases

     

NOTE 12    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Applied leases some of its facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases and has options to renew most leases, with rentals to be negotiated. At October 28, 2001, Applied had two synthetic leases for properties in California and Oregon. Upon its expiration in May 2002, Applied terminated the synthetic lease in California and purchased the property for $65 million. At October 27, 2002, Applied leased office and general operating facilities in Hillsboro, Oregon under a synthetic lease agreement that providesagreement. Applied purchased these facilities for regular payments based on LIBOR. In accordance with this agreement, Applied must maintain compliance with covenants similar to those contained in its credit facilities. At the end of this lease, Applied is required to acquire the property at its original cost or arrange for this property to be acquired by a third party. If the fair market value of the leased property declines below original cost, Applied will be contingently liable under first-loss clauses guaranteeing a residual value for up to approximately $43 million. At October 27, 2002, Applied believed that the fair market value of the leased property was below original cost. Accordingly, Applied had accrued $5$52 million for such expenses at October 27, 2002. Management intends to purchase the property induring fiscal 2003, and believes that this contingent liability will not have a material adverse affect on Applied's financial condition or results of operations in the future.2003.

Total rent expense was $105 million for fiscal 2000, $153 million for fiscal 2001, and $140 million for fiscal 2002.2002 and $134 million for fiscal 2003. Future minimum lease payments at October 27, 200226, 2003 were: $133 million for fiscal 2003; $110$111 million for fiscal 2004; $81$82 million for fiscal 2005; $38$60 million for fiscal 2006; $32$43 million for fiscal 2007; $35 million for fiscal 2008; and $115$147 million thereafter.

Accounts Receivables Sales

Applied has several agreements that allow it to sell accounts receivable from selected customers at a discount to various financial institutions. Receivable sales have the effect of increasing cash and reducing accounts receivable and days sales outstanding. Discounting fees were recorded in interest expense and were not material for fiscal 2000, 2001, 2002 or 2002.2003. Accounts receivable sales under these agreements were $1.5 billion for fiscal 2000, $1.2 billion for fiscal 2001, and $689 million for fiscal 2002.2002 and $556 million for fiscal 2003. At October 27, 2002, $13926, 2003, $168 million of sold receivables remained outstanding under these agreements. A portion of these sold receivables is subject to certain limited recourse provisions. However, Applied has not experienced any losses under these recourse provisions.

Guarantees

     Applied adopted FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Indebtedness of Others,” during the first fiscal quarter of 2003. FIN 45 requires disclosures concerning Applied’s obligations under certain guarantees.

     Pursuant to FIN 45, Applied is required to disclose the changes in product warranty reserves. Applied products are generally sold with a 12-month warranty period following installation. Parts and labor are covered under the terms of the warranty agreement. The warranty provision is based on historical experience by product, configuration and geographic region.

Changes in the warranty reserves were as follows (in thousands):

         
20022003


Beginning balance $236,503  $168,175 
Provisions for warranty  135,077   110,775 
Consumption of reserves  (203,405)  (140,543)
   
   
 
Ending balance $168,175  $138,407 
   
   
 

     As noted above, Applied’s products are generally sold with a 12-month warranty. Accordingly, current warranty provisions are related to the current year’s net sales, and receivables soldwarranty consumption is associated with current and prior year’s net sales.

     During the ordinary course of business, Applied also provides standby letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to certain parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either Applied or its subsidiaries.

51


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

As of October 26, 2003, the maximum potential amount of future payments that Applied could be required to make under these provisionsguarantee agreements was approximately $56 million. Applied has not recorded any liability in connection with these guarantee arrangements beyond that required to appropriately account for the underlying transaction being guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under these guarantee arrangements.

Applied also has additional guarantee arrangements on behalf of certain subsidiaries. As of October 26, 2003, Applied has not recorded any liability related to guarantees of subsidiary obligations. Applied does not expect, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable any amounts will be required to be paid under these arrangements. Subsidiary guarantees as of October 26, 2003 were associated with the following types of arrangements: short-term borrowings, term loans, overdrafts and leases. While certain subsidiaries have termsshort-term borrowing, term loans and credit risk characteristics similaroverdraft facilities available totaling approximately $169 million as of October 26, 2003, no amounts were outstanding as of October 26, 2003. In the event of use and subsequent default of these facilities by Applied’s subsidiaries, such arrangements would be guaranteed by Applied. In addition, certain subsidiaries have lease arrangements guaranteed by Applied. These leases will expire between 2009 and 2014. In the event that the subsidiaries do not make the required payments, Applied could be required to Applied's overall receivables portfolio.

Legal Matters

pay the leases on behalf of the subsidiaries. As of October 26, 2003, annual lease obligations under these arrangements approximated $12 million.
Legal Matters

After     On June 13, 1997, after Varian Associates, Inc. (Varian) failed to respond to requests by Applied to discuss certain patent issues, Applied filed a lawsuit against Varian alleging infringement of several of Applied'sApplied’s patents concerning physical vapor deposition (PVD) technology. On July 7, 1997, Applied amended a previousthat action against Varian to allege infringement of thesethose same Applied PVD patents against Novellus Systems, Inc. (Novellus) and to add Novellus as a defendant, as a result of Novellus'Novellus’ acquisition of Varian'sVarian’s thin film systems PVD business. Applied has settled its action with respect to Varian, but the litigation with Novellus is ongoing. On June 23, 1997, Novellus filed a separate lawsuit against Applied, alleging infringement by Applied of several PVD technology patents that were formerly owned by Varian. Novellus seeks damages for past infringement, a permanent injunction, treble damages for willful infringement, pre-judgment interest and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. Fact discoveryIn September 2000, Applied and Varian settled their disputes, and Applied released all claims with respect to the Inova System as it was made and sold as of May 7, 1997. On October 3, 2000, Applied’s claims against Varian and Varian’s claims and counterclaims against Applied were dismissed with prejudice. The litigation with Novellus continues. Discovery has closed in thesethe actions. The court has rescheduled the previously set a trial date offrom January 20, 2004 to May 27, 2003.24, 2004. Applied believes the May trial will involve only infringement and validity issues regarding Novellus’ patent claims against Applied and Applied’s declaratory judgment claims against Novellus’ patents. Applied believes it has meritorious claims and defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.

On January 8, 2001, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (Axcelis), formerly a subsidiary of Eaton Corporation, filed a lawsuit against Applied, alleging that Applied infringes a patent concerning ion implantation owned by Axcelis. The complaint also alleges various Massachusetts state and common law tortious interference and unfair competition claims. Axcelis seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction, damages, costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. On April 12, 2001, Applied answered the complaint by denying all allegations and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement, and violations of various unfair competition and deceptive trade practices laws. Applied seeks damages, a permanent injunction, costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. FactOn July 2, 2003, a jury ruled in favor of Applied, returning a verdict that Applied’s SwiftTM ion implantation system does not infringe Axcelis’ patent. The court has entered judgment in favor of Applied on Axcelis’ patent claim. Axcelis has filed a notice of appeal and expert discovery has closed. No trial date hasthe appeal is proceeding. The state law claims have not yet been set.resolved. Applied believes it has meritorious defenses and counterclaims to the action and intends to pursue them vigorously.

52


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     On March 12, 2002, Linear Technology Corp. (LTC) filed a lawsuit against Applied alleging claims for breach of contract, fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, suppression of fact, unfair competition, breach of warranty, express contractual indemnity, implied equitable indemnity and declaratory relief. After the court dismissed many of its claims, LTC amended its complaint to allege claims only for fraud and deceit and violation of California Business and Professions Code §17200. In the amended complaint, LTC seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief and restitution. LTC also seeks costs and attorneys’ fees, and also asserts similar claims against certain other semiconductor equipment manufacturers. Applied believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.

On June 11, 2001, Semitool, Inc. (Semitool) filed a lawsuit against Applied,in California alleging that Applied infringes a patent concerning seed repair and electroplating owned by Semitool. Semitool sought a preliminary and permanent injunction, damages, costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. On July 12, 2001, Semitool dismissed the California action and filed a substantially identical lawsuit in Oregon. On July 13, 2001, Applied filed a declaratory judgment action against Semitool seeking a declaration that Applied has not infringed the Semitool patent and that Semitool'sSemitool’s patent is invalid and unenforceable. Applied also seeks costs and attorneys’ fees. The actions are now proceeding together in Oregon. Discovery is ongoing.Semitool has also asserted similar claims against certain other semiconductor equipment manufacturers. The Oregon Court has issued an order interpreting the patent claims.claims and has scheduled a trial date of February 3, 2004. Applied believes it has meritorious claims and defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.

On July 31, 2001, David Scharf, an individual, David Scharf, filed a lawsuit against Applied alleging that Applied has infringed, has induced others to infringe and has contributed to othersothers’ infringement of a patent concerning color synthesizing scanning electron microscope technology. Mr. Scharf seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction, damages and costs. Applied has answered the complaint by denying all allegations and counterclaimingcounterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invaliditynon-infringement and non- infringement. Appliedinvalidity. On May 10, 2002, Mr. Scharf filed a request for re-examination of Mr. Scharf'shis patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office whichOffice. On June 26, 2002, the case was removed from the Court’s active docket after the parties stipulated to stay the case pending the results of that re-examination. On July 11, 2002, Applied filed its own request for re-examination of Mr. Scharf’s patent with the Patent and Trademark Office. Applied’s request for re-examination was granted on September 19, 2002. The Court has removed the suit from its active docket pending the result of the re-examination. Applied believes it has meritorious claimsdefenses and defensescounterclaims and intends to pursue them vigorously.

On March 12, 2002, Linear Technology Corporation (LTC) filed a lawsuit against Applied in California state court alleging claims for breach of contract, fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, suppression of fact, unfair competition, breach of warranty, express contractual indemnity and implied equitable indemnity. LTC filed the California action after a substantially identical lawsuit it filed in federal court in Texas was dismissed by the Texas court. In the California action, LTC seeks damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief and restitution. LTC also seeks costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with its suit against Applied and with a separate (now settled) litigation between LTC and Texas Instruments. Applied has answered the complaint by denying all allegations. No trial date has been set. Applied believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.

On August 27, 2002, ASM America, Inc. and ASM International, N.V. (collectively "ASMI")ASMI) filed a lawsuit against Applied seeking a judicial declaration that ASMI does not infringe six patents belonging to Applied that relate to remote cleaning of chemical vapor deposition (CVD)CVD chambers and to deposition of silicon nitride. The suit also seeks a judicial declaration that two of thosethe six patents are invalid. Applied responded to the complaint by denying the allegations and asserting counterclaims for infringement of the six parents. No trial date has been set. Applied believes it has meritorious defenses and counterclaims and intends to pursue them vigorously.

     On October 3, 2003, ASMI filed a lawsuit against Applied claiming that Applied infringes six ASMI patents. ASMI seeks damages for past infringement, enhanced damages, injunctive relief, costs and attorneys’ fees. Applied responded to the complaint by denying the allegations and asserting counterclaims for invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement of the ASMI patents. Applied also asserted counterclaims for infringement of the six Applied patents at issue in the ASMI-Arizona case and one additional patent. Applied seeks injunctive relief, compensatory and enhance damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. No trial date has been set. Applied believes it has meritorious defenses and counterclaims and intends to pursue them vigorously.

     On September 13, 2002, Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association asserting that Applied has breached a patent license agreement between Varian and Applied dated January 1, 1992. Varian seeks to recover royalties, interest and attorneys’ fees. The arbitration hearing on whether the products are covered by the license agreement has concluded. On May 2, 2003, the arbitration panel issued an interim decision finding that some, but not all, of the products at issue were subject to the agreement. The arbitration panel next will consider whether the

53


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

asserted claims of the patents under which those products were found to be covered are valid. Applied believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.

On October 10, 2002, Robert Bosch GmbH (Bosch), a German company, filed a lawsuit against Applied alleging that Applied infringesinfringed two patents owned by Bosch related to anisotrophicanisotropic etching. Bosch seekssought a preliminary and permanent injunction, damages, costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. Applied has notanswered the complaint and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity. The parties have settled the litigation and all claims and counterclaims have been serveddismissed with and has therefore not responded to, the complaint. No trial date has been set. Applied believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to pursue them vigorously.prejudice.

From time to time, Applied receives notification from customers claiming that such customers are entitled to indemnification or other obligations from Applied related to infringement claims made against the customers by third parties. In addition, Applied is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, Applied does not believe that any of these other existing legal matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Note 12Business Combinations

     

NOTE 13    BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

On March 29, 2000,April 18, 2003, Applied acquired Etec,Boxer Cross, Inc., a supplierproducer of mask pattern generating equipmentin-line monitoring systems that provide customers with critical electrical measurement data for thecontrolling semiconductor and electronics industries, in a stock-for-stock merger accountedprocesses, for as a pooling-of-interests. Applied issued approximately 29 million shares of its common stock to complete this transaction, and recorded $40 million of transaction costs as a one-time operating expense. Additionally, Applied recorded a one-time, pre-tax operating expense of $14 million ($6.5 million in cost of products sold and $7.5 million in general and administrative expenses) to conform Etec's accounting policies to those of Applied. Prior to the merger, Etec's fiscal year end (July 31) was different from Applied's (last Sunday in October). To conform Etec's fiscal 2000 amounts to Applied's fiscal year, Etec's net loss for the three months ended October 31, 1999 was reflected as an adjustment to retained earnings for the first fiscal quarter of 2000. Etec's net sales and net loss for the three months ended October 31, 1999 were $43 million and $708,000, respectively.

On June 27, 2001, Applied acquired Oramir, a supplier of advanced laser cleaning technologies for semiconductor wafers, in a purchase business combination for $21 million in cash. In connection with this acquisition, Applied recorded acquired in-process research and development expense of $10 million and goodwill of $12 million.$18 million, net of adjustments to the initial purchase price allocation, and purchased technology of $3 million, partially offset by other items of $7 million, primarily for deferred tax assets and other liabilities. The amount of acquired in-process research and development expense was determined by identifying research projects for which technological feasibility had not been established and for which no alternative future uses existed. The value of the projects identified to be in process was determined by estimating the future cash flows from the projects once commercially feasible, discounting the net cash flows back to their present value at a rate commensurate with the level of risk and maturity of the projects, and then applying a percentage of completion to the calculated value. Management has assigned a useful life of seven years to the goodwill.insignificant.

On November 20, 2001,April 8, 2002, Applied acquired Electron Vision Corporation, a designer, manufacturer and seller of e-beam stabilization and curing tools for the assets of Schlumberger's electron-beam wafer inspection businesssemiconductor, thin film head and micro-fabrication industries, for $66$26 million in cash. In connection with this acquisition, Applied recorded acquired in-process research and development expense of $6 million and goodwill of $81$13 million, net of adjustments to the initial purchase price allocation, and purchased technology of $16 million, partially offset by net liabilities acquiredother items of $21 million. The amount of acquired in-process research and development expense was determined by identifying research projects$3 million, primarily for which technological feasibility had not been established and for which no alternative future use existed. The value of the projects identified as in process was determined by calculating the total development costs incurred, estimating the portion of development costs related to the aspect of the project that Applied expects to utilize, and then calculating the current value of these historical development costs using a Consumer Price Index adjustment.deferred tax liabilities.

On December 3, 2001, Applied acquired GKS,Global Knowledge Services, Inc., a provider of advanced data mining services to improve semiconductor manufacturing yield and efficiency, for $16 million in cash. In connection with this acquisition, Applied recorded acquired in-process research and development expense of $2 million, goodwill of $6 million, purchased technology of $4 million and other items of $4 million. The amount of acquired in-process research and development expense was determined by identifying research projects for which technological feasibility had not been established and for which no alternative future use existed. The value of the projects identified as in processin-process was determined by estimating the future cash flows from the projects once commercially feasible, discounting the net cash flows back to their present value at a rate commensurate with the level of risk and maturity of the projects, and then applying a percentage of completion to the calculated value.

On April 8, 2002,November 20, 2001, Applied acquired Electron Vision Corporation, a designer, manufacturer and sellerthe assets of e-beam stabilization and curing toolsSchlumberger’s electron-beam wafer inspection business for the semiconductor, thin film head and micro-fabrication industries, for $26$66 million in cash. In connection with this acquisition, Applied recorded acquired in-process research and development expense of $6 million and goodwill of $13$81 million, net of adjustments to the initial purchase price allocation, and purchased technology of $16 million, partially offset by other itemsnet liabilities acquired of $3$21 million. The amount of acquired in-process research and development expense was determined by identifying research projects for which technological feasibility had not been established and for which no alternative future use existed. The value of the projects identified as in-process was determined by calculating the total development costs incurred, estimating the portion of development costs related to the aspect of the project that Applied expects to utilize, and then calculating the current value of these historical development costs using a Consumer Price Index adjustment.

54


APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     On June 27, 2001, Applied acquired Oramir, a supplier of advanced laser cleaning technologies for semiconductor wafers, in a purchase business combination for $21 million primarilyin cash. In connection with this acquisition, Applied recorded acquired in-process research and development expense of $10 million and goodwill of $12 million. The amount of acquired in-process research and development expense was determined by identifying research projects for deferred tax liabilities.which technological feasibility had not been established and for which no alternative future uses existed. The value of the projects identified to be in-process was determined by estimating the future cash flows from the projects once commercially feasible, discounting the net cash flows back to their present value at a rate commensurate with the level of risk and maturity of the projects, and then applying a percentage of completion to the calculated value.

For all of the purchase business combinations discussed above, the results of operations prior to the acquisition dates were not material in relation to those of Applied for any of the periods presented herein. Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed periodically for impairment, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, and purchased technology is amortized over its useful life of five to ten years. These acquisitions have not had, and are not expected to have, a material effect on Applied'sApplied’s financial condition or results of operations.

NOTE 14   UNAUDITED SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On November 4, 2002, Applied announced a headcount reduction of approximately 1,750 positions, or 11 percent of its global workforce, in response to the continuing downturn in the semiconductor industry. The majority of the affected employees were based Santa Clara, California and Austin, Texas, and represented multiple company activities and functions. As a result of these activities, Applied will record a restructuring charge for the first fiscal quarter of 2003.

Note 13Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data

                      
Fiscal Quarter

Fiscal
FirstSecondThirdFourthYear





(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2002:                    
 Net sales $1,000,460  $1,156,472  $1,459,682  $1,445,698  $5,062,312 
 Gross margin $385,452  $462,740  $606,143  $602,326  $2,056,661 
 Net income/(loss) $(45,495) $52,030  $115,227  $147,242  $269,004 
 Earnings/(loss) per share $(0.03) $0.03  $0.07  $0.09  $0.16 
2003:                    
 Net sales $1,054,209  $1,107,177  $1,094,907  $1,220,998  $4,477,291 
 Gross margin $390,382  $372,774  $346,928  $494,371  $1,604,455 
 Net income/(loss) $(65,670) $(62,126) $(36,802) $15,451  $(149,147)
 Earnings/(loss) per share $(0.04) $(0.04) $(0.02) $0.01  $(0.09)

NOTE 15   UNAUDITED QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA


                                                        Fiscal Quarter
                                        -----------------------------------------------   Fiscal
                                           First      Second       Third      Fourth       Year
- --------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

2001:
  Net sales............................ $2,363,254  $2,139,417  $1,575,904  $1,264,673  $7,343,248
  Gross margin......................... $1,142,746    $984,968    $655,613    $468,706  $3,252,033

  Income/(loss) from operations before
    cumulative effect of change
    in accounting principle(1).........   $424,224    $318,377    $114,945    ($82,318)   $775,228
  Net income/(loss)(2).................   $156,825    $318,377    $114,945    ($82,318)   $507,829

  Earnings/(loss) per diluted share....      $0.09       $0.19       $0.07      ($0.05)      $0.30
- --------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

2002:
  Net sales............................ $1,000,460  $1,156,472  $1,459,682  $1,445,698  $5,062,312
  Gross margin.........................   $385,452    $462,740    $606,143    $602,326  $2,056,661

  Net income/(loss)(1).................   ($45,495)    $52,030    $115,227    $147,242    $269,004

  Earnings/(loss) per diluted share....     ($0.03)      $0.03       $0.07       $0.09       $0.16
- --------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

(1) Income/(loss) from operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle included one-time expenses, on an after-tax basis, of $41,182 for the second fiscal quarter of 2001, $12,926 for the third fiscal quarter of 2001 and $104,763 for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001. Net income/(loss) included one-time expenses, on an after-tax basis, of $67,528 for the first fiscal quarter of 2002.55

(2) In addition to the net one-time items included in income/(loss) from operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net income also included an after-tax expense of $267,399 from a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the first fiscal quarter of 2001.


REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

     

Management is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America appropriate inunder the circumstances and, accordingly, include some amounts based on management'smanagement’s best judgments and estimates. Financial information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is consistent with that in the financial statements.

Management is responsible for maintaining a system of internal business controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance, at an appropriate cost/benefit relationship, that assets are safeguarded and that transactions are authorized, recorded and reported properly. The internal control system is augmented by appropriate reviews by management, written policies and guidelines, careful selection and training of qualified personnel and a written code of business ethics applicable to all employees of Applied and its subsidiaries. Management believes that Applied'sApplied’s internal controls provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against material loss from unauthorized use or disposition and that the financial records are reliable for preparing financial statements and other data and maintaining accountability for assets.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, composed solely of Directors who are not employees or officers of Applied, meets on a regular periodic basis with the independent accountants,auditors, internal auditors and management to discuss internal business controls, auditing and financial reporting matters. The Committee reviews with the independent accountantsauditors the scope and results of the audit effort. The Committee also meets with the independent accountantsauditors without management present to ensure that the independent accountantsauditors have free access to the Audit Committee.

The independent accountants,auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are engaged to audit the consolidated financial statements of Applied and to conduct such tests and related procedures as they deem necessary in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. The opinion of the independent accountants,auditors, based upon their audits of the consolidated financial statements, is contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ JAMES C. MORGAN                     /s/ DAN MAYDAN
- --------------------------------        --------------------------------
James C. Morgan                         Dan Maydan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer    President



/s/ JOSEPH R. BRONSON
- --------------------------------
Joseph R. Bronson
Executive Vice President,
Global Executive Committee and
Chief Financial Officer

/s/ MICHAEL R. SPLINTER

Michael R. Splinter
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ JOSEPH R. BRONSON

Joseph R. Bronson
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2002

12, 2003

56


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

AUDITORS

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Applied Materials, Inc.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) on page 2930 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Applied Materials, Inc. and its subsidiaries at October 28, 200127, 2002 and October 27, 2002,26, 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 27, 2002,26, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) on page 2930 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
November 13, 200212, 2003

57


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

These Exhibits are numbered in accordance with the Exhibit Table of Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

Exhibit No.Description

2

Exhibit No.Description


2Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of January 12, 2000, by and among Applied Materials, Inc., Boston Acquisition Sub Inc. and Etec Systems, Inc., incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form S-4 (file no. 333-96427) filed February 8, 2000.

3.1

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation of Applied Materials, Inc., as amended and restated through March 31, 2000, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2000 (file no. 002-45028) filed June 8, 2000.

3.2

3.2

Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Terms of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock dated as of July 9, 1999, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 1999 (file no. 000-06920) filed September 14, 1999.

3.3

3.3

Bylaws of Applied Materials, Inc., as amended and restated through November 28, 2001, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 2001 (file no. 002-45028) filed January 23, 2002.

4.1

4.1

Form of Indenture (including form of debt security) between Applied Materials, Inc. and Harris Trust Company of California, as Trustee, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 8-K (file no. 000- 06920)000-06920) filed on August 17, 1994.

4.2

4.2

Rights Agreement, dated as of July 7, 1999, between Applied Materials, Inc. and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Rights Agent, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A (file no. 000-06920) dated July 13, 1999.

4.3

4.3

First Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2002, between Applied Materials, Inc. and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A (file no. 000-06920) dated November 25, 2002.

10.1*

10.1*

The 1976 Management Stock Option Plan, as amended to October 5, 1993, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1993 (file no. 000-06920) filed December 21, 1993.

10.2*

10.2*

Applied Materials, Inc. Supplemental Income Plan, as amended, including Participation Agreements with James C. Morgan, Walter Benzing, and Robert Graham, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1981 (file no. 000-06920) filed January 22, 1982.

10.3*

10.3*

Amendment to Supplemental Income Plan, dated July 20, 1984, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1984 (file no. 000-06920) filed January 25, 1985.

10.4*

10.4*

The Applied Materials, Inc. Employee Financial Assistance Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Definitive Proxy Statement (file no. 000-06920) filed February 5, 1981.

10.5*

10.5*

Applied Materials, Inc. Supplemental Income Plan as amended to December 15, 1988, including the Participation Agreement with James C. Morgan, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1988 (file no. 000-06920) filed January 23, 1989.

10.6

10.6

License Agreement dated January 1, 1992, between Applied Materials and Varian Associates, Inc., incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1992 (file no. 000-06920) filed December 16, 1992.

10.7*

10.7*

Amendment dated December 9, 1992 to Applied Materials, Inc. Supplemental Income Plan dated June 4, 1981 (as amended to December 15, 1988), incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1993 (file no. 000-06920) filed December 21, 1993.

10.8*

10.8*

Applied Materials, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on April 1, 1995, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 1995 (file no. 000-06920) filed June 7, 1995.

10.9

10.9

Applied Materials, Inc. Medium-Term Notes, Series A Distribution Agreement, dated August 24, 1995, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1995 (file no. 000-06920) filed January 12, 1996.

58


10.10

Exhibit No.

Description


10.10Underwriting Agreement between Applied Materials, Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated dated October 9, 1997, incorporated by reference to form of Underwriting Agreement between Applied Materials, Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated previously filed with Applied'sApplied’s Form S-3 (file no. 033-52471) filed March 1, 1994.

10.11

$250,000,000 Five Year Credit Agreement dated as of March 13, 1998, among Applied Materials, Inc., Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Documentation Agent and Administrative Agent, and Citicorp Securities, Inc., as Syndication Agent, incorporated by reference to Applied's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 26, 1998 (file no. 000-06920) filed June 4, 1998.

10.12*

10.11*

Amendment No. 1 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 26, 1998 (file no. 000-06920) filed September 9, 1998.

10.13*

10.12*

Amendment No. 2 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 26, 1998 (file no. 000-06920) filed September 9, 1998.

10.14

10.13

Receivables Purchase Agreement dated October 22, 1998, between Applied Materials, Inc. and Deutsche Financial Services Corporation, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1998 (file no. 000-06920) filed January 20, 1999.

10.15*

10.14*

Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated Employees'Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan.

Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 2002 (file no. 000-06920) filed January 23, 2003.

10.16

10.15

Amendment dated January 26, 1999 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated October 22, 1998, between Applied Materials, Inc. and Deutsche Financial Services Corporation, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 1999 (file no. 000-06920) filed March 9, 1999.

10.17

10.16

Receivables Purchase Agreement dated January 26, 1999, between Applied Materials, Inc. and Deutsche Financial Services (UK) Limited, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 1999 (file no. 000-06920) filed March 9, 1999.

10.18

10.17

Second Amendment dated April 28, 1999 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated October 22, 1998, between Applied Materials, Inc. and Deutsche Financial Services Corporation, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 1999 (file no. 000-06920) filed June 15, 1999. (Confidential treatment has been granted for certain portions of the agreement.)

10.19

10.18

Amendment dated April 28, 1999 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated January 26, 1999, between Applied Materials, Inc. and Deutsche Financial Services Corporation (UK) Limited, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 1999 (file no. 000-06920) filed June 15, 1999 (Confidential treatment has been granted for certain portions of the agreement.)

10.20*

10.19*

Applied Materials, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement related to the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 1999 (file no. 000-06920) filed June 15, 1999.

10.21

10.20

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Applied Materials, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors, dated June 11, 1999, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1999 (file no. 333-88777) filed January 31, 2000.

10.22

10.21

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Applied Materials, Inc. and James C. Morgan and Dan Maydan, dated June 11, 1999, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1999 (file no. 333-88777) filed January 31, 2000.

10.23

10.22

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Applied Materials, Inc. and Joseph R. Bronson, Sasson Somekh and David N.K. Wang, dated November 2, 1999, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 1999 (file no. 333-88777) filed January 31, 2000.

10.24

10.23

$250,000,000 364-Day Credit Agreement dated March 10, 2000, among Applied Materials, Inc., Citicorp USA, Inc. as Agent, and Bank of America N.A. as Co-Agent, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2000 (file no. 002-45028) filed June 8, 2000.

10.25*

Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated 1995 Equity Incentive Plan.

10.26*

10.24*

Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated Senior Executive Bonus Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Preliminary Proxy Statement (file no. 000-06920) filed February 4, 2000.

10.27*

10.25*

Form of Applied Materials, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Agreement for use under the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 29, 2001 (file no. 002-45028) filed June 7, 2001.

59


10.28*

Exhibit No.

Description


10.26*Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated Employees'Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan for Offshore Employees, incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s S-8 (file no. 033-63847) filed October 31, 1995.

10.29*

10.27*

Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated 30th Anniversary Stock Option Plan.

Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 2002 (file no. 000-06920) filed January 23, 2003.

10.30*

10.28*

Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated 1998 Non-Executive Employee Retention Stock Option Plan.

Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 2002 (file no. 000-06920) filed January 23, 2003.

10.31*

10.29*

Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated 2000 Global Equity Incentive Plan.

Plan, incorporated by reference to Applied’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 2002 (file no. 000-06920) filed January 23, 2003.

10.32*

10.30*

Applied Materials, Inc. Profit Sharing Scheme (Ireland), incorporated by reference to Applied'sApplied’s S-8 (file no. 333-45011) filed January 27, 1998.

12

10.31*

Applied Materials, Inc. Stock Purchase Plan for Offshore Employees, as amended on April 16, 2002, incorporated by reference to Applied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 27, 2003 (file no. 000-06920) filed June 11, 2003.
10.32*Term Sheet for employment of Michael R. Splinter, incorporated by reference to Applied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 27, 2003 (file no. 000-06920) filed June 11, 2003.
10.33*Restricted Stock Agreement for Michael R. Splinter, incorporated by reference to Applied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 27, 2003 (file no. 000-06920) filed June 11, 2003.
10.34Program for Accounts Receivable Transfer Agreement dated April 9, 2003 between Applied Materials, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., incorporated by reference to Applied’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 27, 2003 (file no. 000-06920) filed June 11, 2003. (Confidential treatment has been granted for the redacted portion of the agreement.)
10.35$250,000,000 364-Day Credit Agreement dated September 19, 2003, among Applied Materials, Inc., and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Keybank National Association, BNP Paribas, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. and Citicorp USA, Inc. (Confidential treatment has been requested for redacted portions of the agreement.)
10.36$250,000,000 Three-Year Credit Agreement dated as of September 19, 2003 among Applied Materials, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Keybank National Association, BNP Paribas, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. and Citicorp USA, Inc. (Confidential treatment has been requested for redacted portions of the agreement.)
10.37*Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated 1995 Equity Incentive Plan.
12Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

21

21

Subsidiaries of Applied Materials, Inc.

23

23

Consent of Independent Accountants.

Auditors.

24

24

Power of Attorney.

99.1

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

99.2

32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement, as required by Item 15(a)3.

* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement, as required by Item 15(a)3.60


SIGNATURES

     

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

 ByBy: /s/ JAMES C. MORGANMICHAEL R. SPLINTER
 
 James C. MorganMichael R. Splinter
 ChairmanPresident and
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: January 23, 200313, 2004

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


          Name                            Title                      Date
- -------------------------  -----------------------------------  ---------------

/s/ JAMES C. MORGAN        Chairman and                         January 23, 2003
- -------------------------  Chief Executive Officer
James C. Morgan            (Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ JOSEPH R. BRONSON      Executive Vice President,            January 23, 2003
- -------------------------  Global Executive Committee and
Joseph R. Bronson          Chief Financial Officer
                           (Principal Financial Officer)


/s/ NANCY H. HANDEL        Group Vice President,                January 23, 2003
- -------------------------  Deputy Chief Financial Officer
Nancy H. Handel            and Corporate Controller
                           (Principal Accounting Officer)

Directors:
            *
- -------------------------  President and Director               January 23, 2003
Dan Maydan
            *
- -------------------------  Director                             January 23, 2003
Michael H. Armacost
            *
- -------------------------  Director                             January 23, 2003
Deborah A. Coleman
            *
- -------------------------  Director                             January 23, 2003
Herbert M. Dwight, Jr.
            *
- -------------------------  Director                             January 23, 2003
Philip V. Gerdine
            *
- -------------------------  Director                             January 23, 2003
Paul R. Low
            *
- -------------------------  Director                             January 23, 2003
Steven L. Miller

- -------------------------  Director                             January 23, 2003
Minoru Morio
            *
- -------------------------  Director                             January 23, 2003
Gerhard H. Parker
            *
- -------------------------  Director                             January 23, 2003
Stan Shih

Representing a majority of the members of the Board of Directors.

* By     /s/ JAMES C. MORGAN
James C. Morgan
Attorney-in-Fact **

**By authority of the power of attorney filed herewith.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, James C. Morgan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Applied Materials, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 23, 2003

  
TitleDate


/s/ JAMESMICHAEL R. SPLINTER

Michael R. Splinter
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
January 13, 2004
/s/ JOSEPH R. BRONSON

Joseph R. Bronson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
January 13, 2004
/s/ NANCY H. HANDEL

Nancy H. Handel
Group Vice President, Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
January 13, 2004
Directors:
*

James C. MORGANMorgan
Chairman of the BoardJanuary 13, 2004
*

Michael H. Armacost
DirectorJanuary 13, 2004
*

Deborah A. Coleman
DirectorJanuary 13, 2004
*

Herbert M. Dwight, Jr.
DirectorJanuary 13, 2004
*

Philip V. Gerdine
DirectorJanuary 13, 2004
*

Paul R. Low
DirectorJanuary 13, 2004
*

Dan Maydan
DirectorJanuary 13, 2004
*

Steven L. Miller
DirectorJanuary 13, 2004
*

Gerhard H. Parker
DirectorJanuary 13, 2004
Representing a majority of the members of the Board of Directors.
*By/s/ MICHAEL R. SPLINTER

Michael R. Splinter,

Attorney-in-Fact **


** 
James C. Morgan
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
By authority of the power of attorney filed herewith.

61


I, Joseph R. Bronson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Applied Materials, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 23, 2003

/s/ JOSEPH R. BRONSON

Joseph R. Bronson
Executive Vice President,
Global Executive Committee and
Chief Financial Officer






SCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

(Dollars in thousands)


                             Balance at  Additions-              Balance at
                              Beginning  Charged to                End of
        Fiscal Year            of Year     Income    Deductions     Year
- ---------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

     2000.................       $4,153     ($2,019)      ($309)     $1,825

     2001.................       $1,825      $1,956     ($1,081)     $2,700

     2002.................       $2,700       $  --       ($625)     $2,075

                   
Balance atAdditions -Balance at
Fiscal YearBeginning of YearCharged to IncomeDeductionsEnd of Year





 2001  $1,825  $1,956  $(1,081) $2,700 
 2002  $2,700  $  $(625) $2,075 
 2003  $2,075  $  $(228) $1,847 

62