UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-K
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ___________________ to __________________
 
Commission File Number 1-07978

BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
Incorporated in South Dakota IRS Identification Number 46-0111677
625 Ninth Street,7001 Mount Rushmore Road, Rapid City, South Dakota 5770157702
   
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (605) 721-1700
   
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
   
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes    x    No    ¨

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes    x    No    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes    x    No    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes    x    No    ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
This paragraph is not applicable to the Registrant.        x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, (as definedor an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Act.

Large accelerated filer        ¨    Accelerated filer        ¨

Non-accelerated filer        x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company¨

Emerging growth company    ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes    ¨    No    x

State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant.

All outstanding shares are held by the Registrant’s parent company, Black Hills Corporation. Accordingly, the aggregate market value of the voting common stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates is $0.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
ClassOutstanding at January 31, 20172018
Common stock, $1.00 par value23,416,396 shares

Reduced Disclosure
The Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format.



TABLE OF CONTENTS
   
  Page
   
 GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
   
ITEMS 1. and 2.BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
   
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
   
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
   
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
   
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
   
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
   
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
   
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
   
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
   
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
   
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
   
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
   
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY
   
 SIGNATURES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS



GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

The following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report and have the definitions described below:
ACAlternating Current
AFUDCAllowance for Funds Used During Construction
AOCIAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update as issued by FASB
Baseload plantA power generation facility used to meet some or all of a given region’s continuous energy demand, producing energy at a constant rate.
Basin ElectricBasin Electric Power Cooperative
BHCBlack Hills Corporation, the Parent of Black Hills Power, Inc.
Black Hills Electric GenerationBlack Hills Electric Generation, LLC, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Black Hills Non-regulated Holdings
Black Hills EnergyThe name used to conduct the business of our utility company as well as our utility affiliates
Black Hills Energy South Dakota ElectricIncludes Black Hills Power’s operations in South Dakota, Wyoming and Montana
Black Hills Non-regulated HoldingsBlack Hills Non-regulated Holdings, LLC, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of BHC
Black Hills PowerBlack Hills Power, Inc., a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of BHC (doing business as Black Hills Energy South Dakota)
Black Hills Service CompanyBlack Hills Service Company LLC, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of BHC
Black Hills Utility HoldingsBlack Hills Utility Holdings, Inc. a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of BHC
Black Hills Energy Wyoming ElectricIncludes Cheyenne Lights electric utility operations
CFTCUnited States Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cheyenne LightCheyenne Light, Fuel and Power Company, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of BHC
Cheyenne PrairieCheyenne Prairie Generating Station is a 132 MW natural gas-fired generating facility in Cheyenne, Wyoming, jointly owned by Cheyenne Light and Black Hills Power. Cheyenne Prairie was placed into commercial operationsservice on October 1, 2014.
City of GilletteThe City of Gillette, Wyoming affiliate of the JPB.
CO2
Carbon dioxide
Cooling degree dayA cooling degree day is equivalent to each degree that the average of the high and low temperature for a day is above 65 degrees. The warmer the climate, the greater the number of cooling degree days. Cooling degree days are used in the utility industry to measure the relative warmth of weather and to compare relative temperatures between one geographic area and another. Normal degree days are based on the National Weather Service data for selected locations over a 30 year average.
CPCNCertificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
CPPClean Power Plan
CTCombustion turbine
DCDirect current
DSMDemand Side Management
ECAEnergy Cost Adjustment - adjustments that allow us to pass the prudently-incurred cost of fuel and purchased power through to customers.
EIAEnvironmental Improvement Adjustment
EPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FDICFederal Depository Insurance Corporation
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitchFitch Ratings
GAAPAccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
GHGGreenhouse gasgases


Global SettlementSettlement with a utilities commission where the dollar figure is agreed upon, but the specific adjustments used by each party to arrive at the figure are not specified in public rate orders
Happy JackHappy Jack Wind Farm, LLC, a subsidiary of Duke Energy Generation Services
Heating degree dayA heating degree day is equivalent to each degree that the average of the high and the low temperatures for a day is below 65 degrees. The colder the climate, the greater the number of heating degree days. Heating degree days are used in the utility industry to measure the relative coldness of weather and to compare relative temperatures between one geographic area and another. Normal degree days are based on the National Weather Service data for selected locations over a 30 year average.
IRSInternal Revenue Service
JPBConsolidated Wyoming Municipalities Electric Power System Joint Powers Board. The JPB exists for the purpose of, among other things, financing the electrical system of the City of Gillette. The JPB financed the purchase of 23% of the Wygen III power plant for the City of Gillette.
kVKilovolt
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate
MAPPMid-Continent Area Power Pool
MATSUtility Mercury and Air Toxics Rules under the United States EPA National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal and Oil Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
MDUMontana Dakota Utilities Company
MEANMunicipal Energy Agency of Nebraska
Moody’sMoody’s Investor Services, Inc.
MTPSCMontana Public Service Commission
MWMegawatts
MWhMegawatt-hours
N/ANot Applicable
Native loadEnergy required to serve customers within our service territory
NAVNet Asset Value
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NOLNet operating lossOperating Loss
NOAANational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NOAA Climate Normals
This dataset is produced once every 10 years. This dataset contains daily and monthly normals of temperature, precipitation, snowfall, heating and cooling degree days, frost/freeze dates, and growing degree days calculated from observations at approximately 9,800 stations operated by NOAA’s National Weather Service.

NOx
Nitrogen oxideOxide
OPEBOther Post-Employment Benefits
OSHAOccupational Safety and Health Organization
PacifiCorpPacifiCorp, a wholly owned subsidiary of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company, itself an affiliate of Berkshire Hathaway
Peak System LoadPeak system load represents the highest point of customer usage for a single hour for the system in total. Our system peaks include demand loads for 100% of plants regardless of joint ownership.
PPAPower Purchase Agreement
SDPUCSouth Dakota Public Utilities Commission
SECUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission
Silver SageSilver Sage Windpower, LLC, a subsidiary of Duke Energy Generation Services
SO2
Sulfur dioxideDioxide
SourceGasSourceGas Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries, a gas utility owned by funds managed by Alinda Capital Partners and GE Energy Financial Services, a unit of General Electric Co. (NYSE:GE) that was acquired by BHC on February 12, 2016, and is now named Black Hills Gas Holdings, LLC (doing business as Black Hills Energy)
South Dakota ElectricIncludes Black Hills Power operations in South Dakota, Wyoming and Montana
S&PStandard & Poor’s Rating Services
Spinning ReserveGeneration capacity that is on-line but unloaded and that can respond within 10 minutes to compensate for generation or transmission outages.


TCATransmission Cost Adjustment - adjustments passed through to the customer based on transmission costs that are higher or lower than the costs approved in the rate case.
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017
TFATransmission Facility Adjustment
Thunder CreekThunder Creek Gas Services, LLC
WECCWestern Electricity Coordinating Council
Winter Storm AtlasAn October 2013 blizzard that impacted South Dakota Electric. It was the second most severe blizzard in Rapid City’s history.
WPSCWyoming Public Service Commission
WRDCWyodak Resources Development Corporation, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Black Hills Non-regulated Holdings, LLC
Wyodak PlantWyodak, a 362 MW mine-mouth coal-fired plant in Gillette, Wyoming, is owned 80% by PacifiCorp and 20% by Black Hills Energy South Dakota. Our WRDC mine supplies all of the fuel for the plant.
Wyoming ElectricIncludes Cheyenne Light’s electric utility operations


PART I

Forward-Looking Information

This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements as defined by the SEC. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical fact, including without limitation those statements that are identified by the words “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts” and similar expressions, and include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical facts. From time to time, we may publish or otherwise make available forward-looking statements of this nature, including statements contained within Item 7 - Management’s Discussion & Analysis.Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe we have a reasonable basis, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Nonetheless, our expectations, beliefs or projections may not be achieved or accomplished.

Any forward-looking statement contained in this document speaks only as of the date on which the statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all of the factors, nor can it assess the effect of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. All forward-looking statements, whether written or oral and whether made by or on behalf of us are expressly qualified by the risk factors and cautionary statements in this Form 10-K, including statements contained within Item 1A - Risk Factors.



ITEMS 1 and 2.    BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

General

Black Hills Power (“the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) is a regulated electric utility incorporated in South Dakota, doing business as Black Hills EnergyBHE - South DakotaSD Electric and serving customers in South Dakota, Wyoming and Montana. We began providing electric utility service in 1941. We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of the publicly traded Black Hills Corporation (“Parent”). Engaging in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity provides a solid foundation of revenues, earnings and cash flow that support our capital expenditures, dividends to our Parent, and our overall performance and growth.

As of December 31, 20162017, our ownership interests in electric generation plants were as follows:
Unit
Fuel
Type
Location
Ownership
Interest %
Owned Capacity (MW)
Year
Installed
Wygen III (a)
CoalGillette, WY52%57.22010
Neil Simpson IICoalGillette, WY100%90.01995
Wyodak (b)
CoalGillette, WY20%72.41978
Cheyenne Prairie (c)
GasCheyenne, WY58%55.02014
Neil Simpson CTGasGillette, WY100%40.02000
Lange CTGasRapid City, SD100%40.02002
Ben French Diesel #1-5OilRapid City, SD100%10.01965
Ben French CTs #1-4Gas/OilRapid City, SD100%80.01977-1979
    444.6 
_______________________
(a)We operate Wygen III, a 110 MW mine-mouth coal-fired power plant and own a 52% interest in the facility. MDU owns a 25% interest and the City of Gillette owns the remaining 23% interest. WRDC furnishes all of the coal fuel supply for the plant.
(b)Wyodak is a 362 MW mine-mouth coal-fired power plant owned 80% by PacifiCorp and 20% by us. This baseload plant is operated by PacifiCorp and WRDC furnishes all of the coal fuel supply for 100% of the plant.
(c)
Cheyenne Prairie, a gas-fired power generation facility includes one combined-cycle, 95 MW unit that is jointly owned by Wyoming Electric (40 MW) and us (55 MW). This facilitywas placed into commercial operations on October 1, 2014.



Distribution and Transmission. Our distribution and transmission system serves approximately 71,00072,000 electric customers, with an electric transmission system of 1,2601,264 miles of high voltage lines (greater than 69 kV) and 2,4972,506 miles of lower voltage lines.lines (69 kV or less). In addition, we jointly own 44 miles of high voltage lines with Basin Electric. Our service territory covers areas with a strong and stable economic base including western South Dakota, northeastern Wyoming and southeastern Montana. A majority of our retail electric revenues in 20162017 were generated in South Dakota. We are subject to state regulation by the SDPUC, the WPSC and the MTPSC.

The following are characteristics of our distribution and transmission business:

We have a diverse customer and revenue base. Our revenue mix for the year ended December 31, 20162017 was comprised of 36%33% commercial, 27%25% residential, 7%11% contract wholesale, 6%5% wholesale off-system, 12% industrial and 12%14% municipal and other revenue.

We own 35% and Basin Electric owns 65% of a DC transmission tie that interconnects the Western and Eastern transmission grids, which are independently-operated transmission grids serving the Westernwestern United States and the Easterneastern United States, respectively. This transmission tie, which is 65% owned by Basin Electric, provides transmission access to both the WECC region in the West and the MAPP region in the East. Our system is located in the WECC region. The total transfer capacity of the tie is 200 MW from West to East, and 200 MW from East to West. Our electric system is located in the WECC region. This transmission tie allows us to buy and sell energy in the Eastern interconnectiongrid without having to isolate and physically reconnect load or generation between the two electrical transmission grids. The transmission tiegrids, thus enhancing the reliability of our system. It accommodates scheduling transactions in both directions simultaneously. This transfer capabilitysimultaneously, provides additional opportunityopportunities to sell our excess generation or to make economic purchases to serve our native load and our contract obligations, and enables us to take advantage of the power price differentials between the two electric grids. Additionally, our system is capable of directly interconnecting up to 80 MW of generation or load to the Eastern transmission grid. Transmission constraints within the MAPP transmission system may limit the amount of capacity that may be directly interconnected to the Eastern system at any given time.

We have firm point-to-point transmission access to deliver up to 50 MW of power on PacifiCorp’s transmission system to wholesale customers in the Western region through 2023.



We have firm network transmission access to deliver power on PacifiCorp’s system to Sheridan, Wyoming to serve our power sales contract with MDU through 2017,December 31, 2023, with the right to renew pursuant to the terms of PacifiCorp’s transmission tariff.

Power Sales Agreements. We sell a portion of our current load under long-term contracts. Our key contracts include:

MDU owns a 25% interest in Wygen III’s net generating capacity for the life of the plant. During periods of reduced production at Wygen III, or during periods when Wygen III is off-line, we will provide MDU with 25 MW from our other generation facilities or from system purchases with reimbursement of costs by MDU.MDU.

We have an agreement through December 31, 2023 under which we serve MDU with capacity and energy up to a maximum of 50 MW.

The City of Gillette owns a 23% ownership interest in Wygen III’s net generating capacity for the life of the plant. During periods of reduced production at Wygen III, or during periods when Wygen III is off-line, we will provide the City of Gillette with its first 23 MW from our other generation facilities or from system purchases with reimbursement of costs by the City of Gillette. Under this agreement we will also provide the City of Gillette their operating component of spinning reserves.

•AnWe have an agreement under which weto supply up to 20 MW of energy and capacity to MEAN under a contract that expires in 2023. The terms of the contract run from June 1 through May 31 for each interval listed below. This contract is unit-contingent based on the availability of our Neil Simpson II and Wygen III plants, with decreasing capacity purchased over the term of the agreement. The unit-contingent capacity amounts from Wygen III and Neil Simpson II are as follows:follows:
2017201820 MW - 10 MW contingent on Wygen III and 10 MW contingent on Neil Simpson II
2018-20192018-202015 MW - 10 MW contingent on Wygen III and 5 MW contingent on Neil Simpson II
2020-20212020-202212 MW - 6 MW contingent on Wygen III and 6 MW contingent on Neil Simpson II
2022-202310 MW - 5 MW contingent on Wygen III and 5 MW contingent on Neil Simpson II.II



An agreement from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021 under which weto provide 50 MW of energy to Cargill (assigned to Macquarie on January 3, 2018) during heavy and light load timing intervals.

Regulated Power Plants and Purchased Power. Our electric load is primarily served by our generating facilities in South Dakota and Wyoming, which provide approximately 445 MW of generating capacity, with the balance supplied under purchased power and capacity contracts. We generated approximately 57%50% of our energy requirements in 20162017 and purchased approximately 43%50% which was supplied under the following contracts:

A PPA with PacifiCorp expiring in 2023, whereby we purchase 50 MW of coal-fired baseload power.

A PPA with Wyoming Electric expiring in 2028, under which we will purchase up to 14.7 MW of wind energy through Wyoming Electric’s agreement with Happy Jack.

A PPA with Wyoming Electric expiring in 2029, under which we will purchase up to 20 MW of wind energy through Wyoming Electric’s agreement with Silver Sage.

A Generation Dispatch Agreement with Wyoming Electric that requires us to purchase all of Wyoming Electric’s excess energy.

Since 1995, we have been a net producer of energy. Our 20162017 winter peak system load was 389402 MW and our 20162017 summer peak system load was 438447 MW. None of our generation is restricted by hours of operation, thereby providing us the ability to generate power to meet demand whenever necessary and economically feasible. We have historically optimized the utilization of our power supply resources by selling wholesale power to other utilities and to power marketers in the spot market, and through short-term sales contracts primarily in the WECC and MAPP regions. Our 220 MW of low-cost, coal-fired resources supports most of our native load requirements and positions us for wholesale off-system sales.



Operating Agreements

Horizon Point Agreement - We have an arrangement among South Dakota Electric, Black Hills Service Company, and Black Hills Utility Holdings where there is a cost allocation for the use of the Horizon Point facility that is owned by South Dakota Electric.  This cost allocation, includes the recovery of and return on allocable property and recovery of incurred administrative service expenses for the operation and maintenance of the Horizon Point facility.

Related-party Gas Transportation Service Agreement - On October 1, 2014 we entered intoWe have a gas transportation service agreement with Wyoming Electric in connection with gas supply for Cheyenne Prairie. The agreement is for a term of 40 years, in which we pay a monthly service and facility fee for firm and interruptible gas transportation.

Shared Services Agreement - We have a shared services agreement with Wyoming Electric and Black Hills Wyoming whereby each entity charges for the use of assets and the performance of services being used by, or performed for, an affiliate entity. The revenues and expenses associated with these assets are included in rate base.

Jointly Owned Facilities - We are parties to an agreement with the City of Gillette and MDU for joint ownership of Wygen III. We charge the City of Gillette and MDU for administrative services, plant operations and maintenance for their share of the Wygen III generating facility for the life of the plant.


Regulations

RegulationsRegulatory Accounting

We follow accounting for regulated utility operations and our financial statements reflect the effects of the different rate making principles followed by the various jurisdictions in which we operate. If rate recovery becomes unlikely or uncertain, due to competition or regulatory action, these accounting standards may no longer apply to our regulated operations. In the event we determine that we no longer meet the accounting criteria for regulated operations, the accounting impact to us could be an extraordinary non-cash charge to operations of an amount that could be material.

Rate Regulation

The following table illustrates certain enacted regulatory information with respect to the states in which we operate:

StateAuthorized Rate of Return on EquityAuthorized Return on Rate BaseAuthorized Capital Structure Debt/EquityEffective DateOther Tariffs, Riders and Rate MattersPercentage of Off-System Sale Profits Shared with Customers
Jurisdic-tionAuthorized Rate of Return on EquityAuthorized Return on Rate BaseAuthorized Capital Structure Debt/EquityAuthorized Rate Base (in millions)Effective DateAdditional Tariffed MechanismsPercentage of Off-System Sale Profits Shared with Customers
SDGlobal Settlement7.76%Global Settlement$543.910/2014ECA,TCA, Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery/ DSM70%
SDGlobal Settlement7.76%Global Settlement10/2014ECA,TCA, Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery/ DSM70% 7.76% 5/2014Transmission Facility Adjustment (TFA)N/A
SD 7.76% 6/2011Environmental Improvement Cost Recovery Adjustment TariffN/A 7.76% 6/2011Environmental Improvement Adjustment Tariff (EIA)N/A
WY9.9%8.13%46.7%/53.3%10/2014ECA65%9.9%8.13%46.7%/53.3%$46.810/2014ECA65%
MT15.0%11.73%47%/53%1983N/AN/A
FERC10.8%9.10%43%/57%2/2009FERC Transmission TariffN/A10.8%9.10%43%/57% 2/2009FERC Transmission TariffN/A

Rates for our retail electric service are subject to regulation by the SDPUC for customers in South Dakota, the WPSC for customers in Wyoming and the MTPSC for customers in Montana. Any changes in retail rates are subject to approval by the respective regulatory body. We have rate adjustment mechanisms in Wyoming and South Dakota which provide for pass-through of certain costs related to the purchase, production and/or transmission of electricity. We are also subject to the jurisdiction of FERC with respect to accounting practices and wholesale electricity sales. We have been granted market-based rate authority by FERC and are not required to file cost-based tariffs for wholesale electric rates. Rates charged by us for use of our transmission system are subject to regulation by FERC.

Some of the mechanisms we have in place include:

An approved vegetation management recovery mechanism that allowsannual EIA tariff which recovers costs associated with generation plant environmental improvements. The EIA and TFA were suspended for recoverya six-year period effective July 1, 2017. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of and a returnResults of Operations in Item 7 of this Annual Report on prudently-incurred vegetation management costs.Form 10-K for further information.

In South Dakota we have an

An annual adjustment clause which provides for the direct recovery of increased fuel and purchased power cost incurred to serve South Dakota customers. Additionally, the ECA contains an off-system sales sharing mechanism in which South Dakota customers will receive a credit equal to 100% of off-system power marketing operating income from the first $2 million of power marketing margin from short-term sales and a credit equal to 70% of off-system power marketing operating income.margins from short-term sales in excess of the first $2 million. South Dakota Electric retains the additional 30%. The modification also adjusts theECA methodology allows us to directly assign renewable resources and firm purchases to the customer load. In Wyoming, has a similar Fuelfuel and Purchased Power Cost Adjustment.

In South Dakota we have an approved annual Environmental Improvement Cost Recovery Adjustment tariff which recovers costs associated with generation plant environmental improvements.purchased power cost adjustment is also in place.

We have an approved FERC Transmission Tariff based on a formulaic approach that determines the revenue component of our open access transmission tariff.

Rate Matters

South Dakota

On March 2, 2015,Common Use System (CUS). The annual rate determination process is governed by the SDPUC issued an order approving aFERC formula rate stipulation and agreement authorizing an annual electric revenue increase for us of $6.9 million. The agreement was a Global Settlement and did not stipulate return on equity and capital structure. The SDPUC’s decision provides us a return on our investment in Cheyenne Prairie and associated infrastructure, and provides recovery of our share of operating expenses for this natural gas-fired facility. We implemented interim rates on October 1, 2014, coinciding with Cheyenne Prairie’s commercial operation date. Final rates were approved on April 1, 2015, effective October 1, 2014.



Transmission

On July 23, 2015, we received approval from the WPSC for a CPCN originally filed on July 22, 2014 to construct the Wyoming portion of a $54 million, 230-kV, 144 mile-long transmission line that would connect the Teckla Substation in northeast Wyoming, to the Lange Substation near Rapid City, South Dakota. We received approval on November 6, 2014 from the SDPUC for a permit to construct the South Dakota portion of this line. The first segment of this project connecting Teckla to Osage, Wyoming was energized on August 31, 2016. The second segment of the project is expected to be placed in serviceprotocols established in the first halffiled FERC joint-access transmission tariff. Effective January 1, 2018 the annual revenue requirement increased by $3.3 million and included estimated weighted average capital additions of 2017.$45 million for 2017 and 2018. The annual transmission revenue requirement has a true up mechanism that is posted in June of each year.

State Regulation

Certain states where we conduct electric utility operations have adopted renewable energy portfolio standards that require or encourage us to source, by a certain future date, a minimum percentage of the electricity delivered to customers from renewable energy generation facilities. At December 31, 2016,2017, we were subject to the following renewable energy portfolio standards or objectives:

South Dakota. In 2015, South Dakota has adopted a renewable portfolio objective that encourages, but does not mandate utilities to generate, or cause to be generated, at least 10% of their retail electricity supply from renewable energy sources by 2015.sources.

Montana. In 2005, Montana has established a renewable portfolio standard that requires public utilities to obtain a percentage of their retail electricity sales from eligible renewable resources. In March 2013, the Montana Legislature adopted legislation that excluded us from all renewable portfolio standard requirements under Senate Bill 164, primarily due to the very low number of customers we have in Montana and the relatively high cost of meeting the renewable requirements.

Wyoming. Wyoming currently has no renewable energy portfolio standard.

Absent a specific renewable energy mandate in South Dakota, our current strategy is to prudently incorporate renewable energy into our resource supply, seeking to minimize associated rate increases for our utility customers. Mandatory portfolioPortfolio standards have increased, and may continue to increase the power supply costs of our electric utility operations. Although we will seek to recover these higher costs in rates, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to secure full recovery of the costs we pay to be in compliance with standards or objectives. We cannot at this time reasonably forecast the potential costs associated with any new renewable energy standards that have been or may be proposed at the federal or state level.

Environmental RegulationsMatters

We are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and the safety and health of personnel and the public. These laws and regulations affect a broad range of our utility activities, and generally regulate: (i) the protection of air and water quality; (ii) the identification, generation, storage, handling, transportation, disposal, record-keeping, labeling, reporting of, and emergency response in connection with hazardous and toxic materials and wastes, including asbestos; and (iii) the protection of plant and animal species and minimization of noise emissions. We have incurred, and expect to incur, capital, operating and maintenance costs for the operations of our plants to comply with these laws and regulations. While the requirements are evolving, it is virtually certain that environmental requirements placed on the operations will continue to be more restrictive.

Water Issues

Issues. Our facilities are subject to a variety of state and federal regulations governing existing and potential water/wastewater discharges and protection of surface waters from oil pollution. Generally, such regulations are promulgated under the Clean Water Act and govern overall water/wastewater discharges through NPDESEPA’s surface water discharge and storm water permits. All of our facilities that are required to have such permits have those permits in place and are in compliance with discharge limitations and plan implementation requirements. The EPA proposed effluent limitation guidelines and standards on June 7, 2013 and published the final rule on November 3, 2015. This rule will have an impact on the Wyodak Plant, requiring conversion to a dry method of handling coal ash and further restrictions of constituent concentrations in any off-site discharges. Our share of those costs is estimated at $1.8 million. The terms of this new regulation become effective atimpact the next permit renewal, which will be in 2020.


Additionally, the EPA regulates surface water oil pollution through its oil pollution prevention regulations. All of our facilities subject to these regulations have compliant prevention plans in place.

Clean Air Act

Title IV of the CleanShort-term Emission Limits.The EPA and State Air Act created an SOQuality Programs implemented short-term emission limits for coal and natural gas-fired generating units during normal and start-up operating scenarios for Sulfur Dioxide (SO2 allowance trading regime), Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) and Opacity. The limits pertain to emissions during start-up periods and upset conditions such as part of the federal acid rain program. Each allowance gives the owner the right to emit one ton of SO2.Certain facilities are allocated allowances based on their historical operating data. At the end of each year, each emitting unit must possess allowances sufficient to cover its emissions for the preceding year. Allowances may be traded, so affected units that expect to emit more SO2 than their allocated allowances may purchase allowances on the open market.mechanical

Title IV applies
malfunctions. State and federal regulatory agencies typically excuse short-term emissions exceedances if they are reported and corrected immediately or if it occurs during start-up.

We proactively manage this requirement by improving maintenance efforts and installing additional pollution control systems to severalcontrol SO2 emission short-term excursions during start-up. These actions have nearly eliminated our short-term emission limit compliance risk while plant availability remained above 90% for all four of our generation facilities, includingcoal-fired plants at the Neil Simpson II, Neil Simpson CT, Lange CT, Wygen III, Cheyenne PrairieComplex. To eliminate the remaining potential for exceedances, an innovative trip logic mechanism was implemented to shut the power plant down if a predicted emission limit is to be exceeded. Similar efforts have been taken and Wyodak plants. Without purchasing additional allowances, we currently hold sufficient allowances to satisfy Title IV at all such plants through 2046. We expect to integrate the cost of obtaining the required number of allowances needed for future projects intosimilar results achieved with our overall financial analysis of such new projects.

Title V of the Clean Air Act requires that all of our generating facilities obtain operating permits. All of our existing facilities have received Title V permits, with the exception of Wygen III and Cheyenne Prairie Generating Station. Wygen III and Cheyenne Prairie Generating Station are allowed to operate under their construction permit until the Title V permit is issued by the state. The Title V application for Wygen III was submitted in January 2011, with the permit expected in 2017. The Cheyenne Prairie Generating Station Title V application was submitted in 2015, with the permit expected in 2017. All applications were filed in accordance with regulatory requirements.

On February 16, 2012, the EPA published in the Federal Register the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal and Oil Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (MATS), with an effective date of April 16, 2012. This rule imposes requirements for mercury, acid gases, metals and other pollutants. As of April 16, 2016, all plants are in compliance.natural gas fired combustion turbine sites as well.

In August 2012, the EPA proposed revisionsRegional Haze (Impacts to the Electric Utility New Source Performance Standards for stationary combustion turbines. This rule is expected to be finalized in 2017 and, as proposed, will be applicable to Cheyenne Prairie and eventually all the combustion turbines in our fleet. Among other things, the rule seeks to eliminate startup exemptions and clearly define overhauls for impact on the EPA’s New Source Review regulations, with the intention of eventually bringing all units under the applicability of this rule. Wyodak Power Plant). The primary impact is expected to be on our older existing units, which will eventually be required to meet tighter NOx emission limitations.

Regional Haze

TheEPA Regional Haze Program is an EPA rule was promulgated to improve visibility in our National Parks and Wilderness Areas.The stateState of Wyoming is currently developingproposed controls in its 2017 initial progress report under the EPA’s Regional Haze Program. Neil Simpson II is not currently a discussion item in that draft report, but could be in the future.

The Wyodak Power Plant is included in EPA’s January 30, 2014 Regional Haze FederalState Implementation Plan (SIP) which includes significant additional NOallowed Pacificorp to install low-NOx controls by March 1, 2019. Our shareburners in its Wyodak Plant. The EPA did not agree with the State of those costs is estimated at $20 million.Wyoming’s determination and overruled it in a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). The State of Wyoming and PacifiCorp filed requests for reconsideration and Administrative Stay with EPA andother interested parties are challenging the United States CourtEPA’s determination. If the challenge is unsuccessful, additional capital investment would be necessary to bring the Wyodak Plant into compliance. Our share of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. On September 9, 2014, the 10th Circuit stayed EPA’s NOx requirement for Wyodak pending outcome of the appeal, which is anticipated tothis capital investment would be settled by the summer of 2017.approximately $40 million.

Greenhouse Gas Regulations

The GHG Tailoring Rule, effective June 2010, will impact us in the event of a major modification at an existing facility or in the event of a new major source as defined by EPA regulations. Upon renewal of operating permits for existing facilities, monitoring and reporting requirements will be implemented. New projects or major modifications to existing projects will result in a Best Available Control Technology review that could impose more stringent emissions control practices and technologies. The EPA’s GHG New Source Performance Standard for new steam electric generating units, published October 2015, effectively prohibits new coal-fired units until carbon capture and sequestration becomes technically and economically feasible.



Clean Power Plan.The portion of this rule-making that applies EPA was directed to existing power generation sources is known asrepeal, revise, and replace the Clean Power Plan (CPP). rule. The portion of this rule-making that appliesEPA issued two public notices in the Federal Register late in 2017. The first identified the EPA’s intent to new generating units effectively prohibits new coal-fired power plants from being constructed until carbon capturerepeal the rule and sequestration becomes technically and economically feasible. The objective ofthe second was issued to seek public input on proposals to replace the CPP regulation is to decrease existing coal-firedwith an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making (ANPRM). Natural gas and renewable generation increase the utilization of existing gas-fired combined cycle generation, increase renewable energy and increase use of demand side management. The U.S. Supreme Court entered an order staying the CPP in February 2016, pending appeal. The effect of the order is to delay the CPP’s compliance deadlines until challenges to the CPP have been fully litigated and the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled. If the CPP is implemented in its current form, we cannot predict the terms of state plans and any limits on CO2 emissions at our existing plants could have a material impact on our customer rates, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows. In 2015 and again in 2016, we met with staff of state air programs and public utility commissions on several occasions. We will continue to work closely with state regulatory staff as these plans develop.

Wyoming passed GHG legislation in 2012 and 2013, enabling the state to implement the EPA’s GHG program. Wyoming adopted and submitted a GHG regulatory program toindustries are pushing the EPA whichto replace the EPA approved and published in 2013. Wyoming has full jurisdiction over the GHG permitting program which includes the transfer of the Cheyenne Prairie EPA GHG air permit, to the state of Wyoming. This eliminates the increased time, expense and considerable risk of obtaining a permit from the EPA.

In 2016, we reported 2015 GHG emissions from our generation facilities in order to comply with the EPA’s GHG Annual Inventory regulation, issued in 2009. We continue to report annual GHG emissions as required by the EPA. Climate change issues are the subject of a number of lawsuits, the outcome of which could impact the utility industry. We will continue to review GHG impacts as legislation or regulation develops and litigation is resolved.

New or more stringent regulations or other energy efficiency requirements could require us to incur significant additional costs relating to, among other things, the installation of additional emission control equipment, the acceleration of capital expenditures, the purchase of additional emissions allowances or offsets, the acquisition or development of additional energy supply from renewable resources and the closure of certain generating facilities. To the extent our regulated fossil-fuel generating plants are included in rate base, we will attempt to recover costs associated with complying with emission standards or other requirements. We will also attempt to recover the emission compliance costs of our non-regulated fossil-fuel generating plants from utility customers and other purchasers of the power generated by our non-regulated power plants, including utility affiliates. Any unrecovered costs could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position and/or cash flows. In addition, future changes in environmental regulations governing air emissions could render some of our power generating units more expensive or uneconomical to operate and maintain. The results of the 2016 U.S. elections add uncertainty as to the final disposition of recently enacted and proposed EPA regulations, including the Clean Power Plan.current rule. We will continue to monitor and comment on the proposals and take appropriate action related to any new developments for potential impacts to our operations.or modified rules.

Regulatory Accounting

Environmental risk changes constantly with the implementation of new or modified regulations, changing stakeholder interests and needs, and through the introduction of innovative work practices and technologies. We follow accounting for regulated utility operationsassess risk annually and our financial statements reflectdevelop mitigation strategies to successfully and responsibly manage and ensure compliance across the effectsenterprise. For additional information on environmental matters, see Item 1A and Note 11 of the different rate making principles followed by the various jurisdictionsNotes to Financial Statements in which we operate. If rate recovery becomes unlikely or uncertain, due to competition or regulatory action, these accounting standards may no longer apply to our regulated operations. In the event we determine that we no longer meet the accounting criteria for regulated operations, the accounting impact to us could be an extraordinary non-cash charge to operations of an amount that could be material.this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 of our Notes to Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information on new accounting standards adopted in 20162017 or pending adoption.



ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

The nature of our business subjects us to a number of uncertainties and risks. The following risk factors and other risk factors that we discuss in our periodic reports filed with the SEC should be considered for a better understanding of our Company. These important factors and other matters discussed herein could cause our actual results or outcomes to differ materially.

Regulatory commissions may refuse to approve some or all of the utility rate increases we have requested or may request in the future, or may determine that amounts passed through to customers were not prudently incurred and therefore are not recoverable.

Our electricityregulated electric operations are subject to cost-of-service regulation and earnings oversight from federal and state utility commissions. This regulatory treatment does not provide any assurance as to achievement of desired earnings levels. Our rates are regulated on a state-by-state basis by the relevant state regulatory authorities based on an analysis of our costs, as reviewed and approved in a regulatory proceeding. The rates that we are allowed to charge may or may not match our related costs and allowed return on invested capital at any given time. While rate regulation is premised on the full recovery of prudently incurred costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, there can be no assurance that the state public utility commissions will judge all of our costs, including our direct and allocated borrowing and debt service costs, to have been prudently incurred or that the regulatory process in which rates are determined will always result in rates that produce a full recovery of our costs and the return on invested capital allowed by the applicable state public utility commission.

To some degree, we are permitted to recover certain costs (such as increased fuel, purchased power and transmission costs, as applicable) without having to file a rate case. To the extent we are able to pass through such costs to customers and a state public utility commission subsequently determines that such costs should not have been paid by customers;customers, we may be required to refund such costs to customers. Any such costs not recovered through rates, or any such refund, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Our financial performance depends on the successful operation of our facilities. If the risks involved in our operations are not appropriately managed or mitigated, our operations may not be successful and this could adversely affect our results of operations.

Operating electric generating facilities and electric distribution sustems involves risks, including:

Operational limitations imposedDisrupted transmission and distribution. We depend on transmission and distribution facilities, including those operated by environmentalunaffiliated parties, to deliver the electricity that we sell to our retail and other regulatory requirements;wholesale customers. If transmission is interrupted, our ability to sell or deliver product and satisfy our contractual obligations may be hindered;

Interruptions to supply of fuel and other commodities used in generation and distribution. We purchase fuel from a number of suppliers. Our results of operations could be negatively impacted by disruptions in the delivery of fuel due to various factors, including but not limited to, transportation delays, labor relations, weather and environmental regulations, which could limit our ability to operate our facilities;

Breakdown or failure of equipment or processes, including those operated by PacifiCorp at the Wyodak plant;

Our ability to transition and replace our retirement-eligible employees;

Inability to recruit and retain skilled technical labor;

Disrupted transmission and distribution. We depend on transmission and distribution facilities, including those operated by unaffiliated parties, to deliver the electricity that we sell to our retail and wholesale customers. If transmission is interrupted, our ability to sell or deliver product and satisfy our contractual obligations may be hindered;

Electricity is dangerous for employees and the general public should they come in contact with power lines or electrical service facilities and equipment. Natural conditions and other disasters such as wind, lightning and winter storms can cause wildfires, pole failures and associated property damage and outages;

Operational limitations imposed by environmental and other regulatory requirements;

Breakdown or failure of equipment or processes, including those operated by PacifiCorp at the Wyodak plant;

Labor relations.

Our ability to transition and replace our retirement-eligible employees;

Inability to recruit and retain skilled technical labor;





Disruption in the functioning of our information technology and network infrastructure which are vulnerable to disability, failures and unauthorized access. If our information technology systems were to fail and we were unable to recover in a timely manner, we would be unable to fulfill critical business functions; and

Labor relations.Changes in the interpretation of the TCJA could adversely affect us.

On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was signed into law, significantly reforming the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. The TCJA, among other things, includes a decrease in the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, imposes significant additional limitations on the deductibility of interest, allows for the expensing of capital expenditures, and modifies or repeals many business deductions and credits. The new tax law contains several provisions that impacted our 2017 financial results and will impact the Company into the future. As allowed under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), the Company has recorded provisional income tax amounts as of December 31, 2017 for changes pursuant to the TCJA related to depreciation, for which the impacts could not be finalized upon issuance of the Company’s financial statements, but reasonable estimates could be determined.

In accordance with ASC 740, the enactment of the law on December 22, 2017 required revaluation of federal deferred tax assets and liabilities using the new lower corporate statutory tax rate of 21%. As a result of the revaluation, deferred tax liabilities were reduced by approximately $103 million. Of the $103 million, approximately $97 million is related to our regulated utilities and was reclassified to a regulatory liability. This regulatory liability will generally be amortized over the remaining life of the related assets using the normalization principles as specifically prescribed in the TCJA. The revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the 21% federal corporate tax rate that are not subject to the regulatory construct resulted in a one-time, non-cash, income tax benefit of approximately $6 million in 2017.

We are working with utility regulators in each of the states we serve to provide benefits of tax reform to our customers.
The lower tax rate effective January 1, 2018, will negatively impact the Company’s cash flows for the next several years.

If we are unable to obtain reasonable outcomes with our utility regulators in passing benefits of the TCJA back to customers, or if our interpretations on the provisions of interest deductibility in the TCJA change, our results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be materially impacted.

Construction, expansion, refurbishment and operation of power generating and transmission facilities involve significant risks which could reduce profitability.

The construction, expansion, refurbishment and operation of power generating and transmission facilities involve many risks, including:

The inability to obtain required governmental permits and approvals along with the cost of complying with or satisfying conditions imposed upon such approvals;

Contractual restrictions upon the timing of scheduled outages;

The cost of supplying or securing replacement power during scheduled and unscheduled outages;

The unavailability or increased cost of equipment;

The cost of recruiting and retaining or the unavailability of skilled labor;

Supply interruptions, work stoppages and labor disputes;

Increased capital and operating costs to comply with increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations;

Opposition by members of the public or special-interest groups;

Weather interferences;

Availability and cost of fuel supplies;

Unexpected engineering, environmental or geological problems; and



Unanticipated cost overruns.

The ongoing operation of our facilities involves many of the risks described above, in addition to risks relating to the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes and performance below expected levels of output or efficiency. New plants may employ recently developed and technologically complex equipment, including newer environmental emission control technology. Any of these risks could cause us to operate below expected capacity levels, which in turn could reduce revenues, increase expenses or cause us to incur higher operating and maintenance costs and penalties. While we maintain insurance, obtain warranties from vendors and obligate contractors to meet certain performance levels, the proceeds of such insurance and our rights under warranties or performance guarantees may not be timely or adequate to cover lost revenues, increased expenses, liability or liquidated damage payments.

Our revenues, results of operations and financial condition are impacted by customer growth and usage in our service territories and may fluctuate with current economic conditions, emerging technologies or responses to price increases.

Our revenues, results of operations and financial condition are impacted by demand in our service territories. Customer growth and usage may be impacted by a number of factors, including:including the voluntary reduction of consumption of electricity and natural gas by our customers in response to increases in prices and demand-side management programs, economic conditions impacting decreases in customers’ disposable income and the use of distributed generation resources or other emerging technologies. Continued technological improvements may make customer and third-party distributed generation and energy storage systems, including fuel cells, micro-turbines, wind turbines, solar cells and batteries, more cost effective and feasible for our customers. If more customers utilize their own generation, demand for energy from us would decline. Such developments could affect the price of energy and delivery of energy, require further improvements to our distribution systems to address changing load demands and could make portions of our electric system power supply and transmission and/or distribution facilities obsolete prior to the end of their useful lives.  Each of these factors could materially affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.



Our operations rely on storage and transportation assets owned by third parties to satisfy our obligations.

We rely on pipeline companies and other owners of gas storage facilities to deliver natural gas to our natural gas-fired power plants. If storage capacity is inadequate or transportation is disrupted, our ability to satisfy our obligations may be hindered. As a result, we may be responsible for damages incurred by our counterparties, such as the additional cost of acquiring alternative supply at then-current market rates, or for penalties imposed by state regulatory authorities.

National and regional economic conditions may cause increased counterparty risk, late payments and uncollectible accounts, which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

A future recession may lead to an increase in late payments from retail, commercial and industrial utility customers, as well as from our non-regulated customers. If late payments and uncollectible accounts increase, earnings and cash flows from our continuing operations may be reduced.

Our credit ratings could be lowered below investment grade in the future. If this were to occur, it could impact our access to capital, our cost of capital and our other operating costs.

Our credit rating on our First Mortgage Bonds is A1 by Moody’s, A- by S&P and A by Fitch. Reduction of our credit ratings could impair our ability to refinance or repay our existing debt and to complete new financings on reasonable terms, or at all. A credit rating downgrade could also result in counterparties requiring us to post additional collateral under existing or new contracts or trades.

Prices for some of our products and services as well as a portion of our operating costs are volatile and may cause our revenues and expenses to fluctuate significantly.

A portion of our net income is attributable to sales of contract and off-system wholesale electricity. The related powerEnergy prices are influenced by many factors outside our control, including, among other things, fuel prices, transmission constraints, supply and demand, weather, general economic conditions, and the rules, regulations and actions of the system operators in those markets. Moreover, unlike most other commodities, electricity cannot be stored and therefore must be produced concurrently with its use. As a result, wholesale power markets may be subject to significant, unpredictable price fluctuations over relatively short periods of time.



Our energy production, transmission and distribution activities involve numerous risks that may result in accidents and other catastrophic events that could give rise to additional costs and cause a substantial loss to us.

Inherent in our electricity transmission and distribution activities are a variety of hazards and operating risks, such as fires, releases of hazardous materials, explosions and operational problems. These events could impact the safety of employees or others and result in injury or loss of human life, and cause significant damage to property or natural resources (including public lands), environmental pollution, impairment of our operations, and substantial financial losses to us. Particularly for our transmission and distribution lines located near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers, industrial sites and other public gathering areas, the damages resulting from any such events could be substantial. While we maintain liability and property insurance coverage, such policies are subject to certain limits and deductibles. The occurrence of any of these events not fully covered by our insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Operating results can be adversely affected by variations from normal weather conditions.

Our utility business is a seasonal business and weather patterns can have a material impact on our operating performance. Demand for electricity is typically greater in the summer and winter months associated with cooling and heating. Accordingly, our utility operations have historically generated lower revenues and income when weather conditions are cooler than normal in the summer and warmer than normal in the winter. Unusually mild summers and winters therefore could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Our business is located in areas that could be subject to seasonal natural disasters such as severe snow and ice storms, flooding and wildfires. These factors could result in interruption of our business, damage to our property such as power lines and substations, and repair and clean-up costs associated with these storms.events. We may not be able to recover the costs incurred in restoring transmission and distribution property following these natural disasters through a change in our regulated rates thereby resulting in a negative impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.



The costs to achieve or maintain compliance with existing or future governmental laws, regulations or requirements, and any failure to do so, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Our business is subject to extensive energy,numerous environmental and other laws and regulations affecting many aspects of federal, stateits present and local authorities. Wefuture operations, including air emissions, water quality, wastewater discharges, solid waste and hazardous waste. These laws and regulations can result in increased capital, operating and other costs. These laws and regulations generally mustrequire us to obtain and comply with a wide variety of regulations,environmental licenses, permits, inspections and other approvals in order to operate, which couldapprovals. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations can require significant capital expenditures, including expenditures for cleanup costs and operating costs. If we faildamages arising from contaminated properties. Failure to comply with these requirements, we could be subject to civil or criminal liability andenvironmental regulations may result in the imposition of fines, penalties liensand injunctive measures affecting operating assets.

We may not be successful in recovering capital and operating costs incurred to comply with new environmental regulations through existing regulatory rate structures and contracts with customers. More stringent in environmental laws or fines, claimsregulations could result in additional costs of operation for property damageexisting facilities or personal injury, and/orimpede the development of new facilities. Although it is not expected that the costs to comply with current environmental clean-up costs. In addition, existing regulations may be revised or reinterpreted and new laws and regulations may be adopted or become applicable to us or our facilities, which could require additional unexpected expenditures or cause us to reevaluate the feasibility of continued operations at certain sites andwill have a detrimentalmaterial adverse effect on our business.

Future steps to bring our facilities into compliance, if necessary, could be expensive and could adversely affect ourfinancial position, results of operations and financial condition. Environmentalor cash flows, future environmental compliance expenditurescosts could be substantial in the future if the trend towards stricter standards, greater regulation, more extensive permitting requirements and an increase in the number of assets we operate continues.have a significant negative impact.

Our ability to obtain insurance and the terms of any available insurance coverage could be adversely affected by international, national, state or local events and company-specific events, as well as the financial condition of insurers. Our insurance coverage may not provide protection against all significant losses.

Our ability to obtain insurance, as well as the cost of such insurance, could be affectedimpacted by developments affecting insurance businesses, international, national, state or local events and company-specific events, as well as the financial condition of insurers. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available at all, or at rates or on terms similar to those presently available to us. A loss for which we are not fully insured could materially and adversely affect our financial results. Our insurance may not be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject, including but not limited to environmental hazards, fire-related liability from natural events or inadequate facility maintenance, distribution property losses and cyber-security risks.



Municipal governments may seek to limit or deny franchise privileges which could inhibit our ability to secure adequate recovery of our investment in assets subject to condemnation.

Municipal governments within our utility service territories possess the power of condemnation and could establish a municipal utility within a portion of our current service territories by limiting or denying franchise privileges for our operations and exercising powers of condemnation over all or part of our utility assets within municipal boundaries. Although condemnation is a process that is subject to constitutional protections requiring just and fair compensation, as with any judicial procedure, the outcome is uncertain. If a municipality sought to pursue this course of action, we cannot assure that we would secure adequate recovery of our investment in assets subject to condemnation.

Federal and state laws concerning greenhouse gasGHG regulations and air emissions may materially increase our generation and production costs and could render some of our generating units uneconomical to operate and maintain.

We own and operate regulated fossil-fuel generating plants in South Dakota and Wyoming. Recent developments under federal and state laws and regulations governing air emissions from fossil-fuel generating plants may result in more stringent emission limitations, which could have a material impact on our costs of operations. Various pending or final state and EPA regulations that will impact our facilities are also discussed in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Environmental Regulations.”
The GHG Tailoring Rule, effective June 2010 will impact us in the event of a major modification at an existing facility or in the event of a new major source as defined by EPA regulations. Upon renewal of operating permits for existing facilities, monitoringsection “Business and reporting requirements will be implemented. New projects or major modifications to existing projects will result in a Best Available Control Technology review that could impose more stringent emissions control practices and technologies. The EPA’s GHG New Source Performance Standard for new steam electric generating units, published October 2015, effectively prohibits new coal-fired units until carbon capture and sequestration becomes technically and economically feasible.


On October 23, 2015, the EPA finalized the CPP to cut carbon emissions from existing electric generating units. The design of the CPP is to decrease existing coal-fired generation, increase the utilization of existing gas generation, increase renewable energy and demand side management. The rule, which does not propose to regulate individual emission sources, calls for each state to develop plans to meet the EPA-assigned statewide average emission rate target for that state by 2030. The rule also allows states to formulate a regional approach whereby they would join with other states and be assigned a new single target for the group. The U.S. Supreme Court entered an order staying the CPP in February 2016, pending appeal. The effect of the order is to delay the CPP’s compliance deadlines until challenges to the CPP have been fully litigated and the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled. In 2015 and again in 2016, we met with the staff of state air programs and public utility commissions on several occasions. We will continue to work closely with state regulatory staff as these plans develop.Properties.”

Due to uncertainty as to the final outcome of federal climate change legislation, legal challenges, state clean power plan developments or regulatory changes under the Clean Air Act, we cannot definitively estimate the effect of GHG legislation or regulation on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

New or more stringent regulations or other energy efficiency requirements could require us to incur significant additional costs relating to, among other things, the installation of additional emission control equipment, the acceleration of capital expenditures, the purchase of additional emissions allowances or offsets, the acquisition or development of additional energy supply from renewable resources, the closure or reduction of load of coal generatingcoal-generating facilities and potential increased load of our combined cycle natural gas firedgas-fired units. To the extent our regulated fossil-fuel generating plants are included in rate base we will attempt to recover costs associated with complying with emission standards or other requirements. Any unrecovered costs could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, future changes in environmental regulations governing air emissions could render some of our power generating units more expensive or uneconomical to operate and maintain.

Increased risks of regulatory penalties could negatively impact our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Business activities in the energy sector are heavily regulated, primarily by agencies of the federal government. Agencies that historically sought voluntary compliance, or issued non-monetary sanctions, now employ mandatory civil penalty structures for regulatory violations. The FERC, NERC, CFTC, EPA, OSHA, and SEC may impose significant civil and criminal penalties to enforce compliance requirements relative to our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and/or our financial results.

Certain Federal laws, including the Migratory Bird Act and the Endangered Species Act, provide special protection to certain designated species. These laws and any state equivalents provide for significant civil and criminal penalties for non-permitted activities that result in harm to or harassment of certain protected animals, including damage to their habitats. If such species are located in an area in which we conduct operations, or if additional species in those areas become subject to protection, our operations and development projects, particularly transmission, generation, and wind, projects, could be restricted or delayed, or we could be required to implement expensive mitigation measures.

An effective system of internal control may not be maintained, leading to material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires management to make an assessment of the design and effectiveness of internal controls. During their assessment of these controls, management or our independent registered public accounting firm may identify areas of weakness in control design or effectiveness, which may lead to the conclusion that a material weakness in internal control exists.A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Any control deficiencies we identify in the future could adversely affect our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis, which could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports or have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business or access sources of liquidity.



Threats of terrorism and catastrophic events that could result from terrorism, or individuals and/or groups attempting to disrupt our businesses, or the businesses of third parties, may impact our operations in unpredictable ways.

Terrorist acts or other similar events could harm our business by limiting its ability to generate, purchase or transmit power and by delaying the development and construction of new generating facilities and capital improvements to existing facilities. These events, and governmental actions in response, could result in a material decrease in revenues and significant additional costs to repair and insure our assets and could adversely affect our operations by contributing to disruption of supplies and markets for natural gas, oil and other fuels. They could also impair our ability to raise capital by contributing to financial instability and lower economic activity.

The implementation of security guidelines and measures and maintenance of insurance, to the extent available, addressing such activities could increase costs. These types of events could materially adversely affect our financial results. In addition, these types of events could require significant management attention and resources and could adversely affect our reputation among customers and the public.

A cyber attack may disrupt our operations, or lead to a loss or misuse of confidential and proprietary information and create a potential liability.

We use and operate sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructure. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we collect and retain sensitive information including personal information about our customers and employees. Cyber attacks targeting our electronic control systems used at our generating facilities and for electric and gas distribution systems, could result in a full or partial disruption of our electric operations. Cyber attacks targeting other key information technology systems could further add to a full or partial disruption toof our operations. Any disruption of these operations could result in a loss of service to customers and a significant decrease in revenues, as well as significant expense to repair system damage and remedy security breaches. Any theft, loss and/or fraudulent use of customer, shareowner, employee or proprietary data as a result of a cyber attack could subject us to significant litigation, liability and costs, as well as adversely impact our reputation with customers and regulators, among others.

We have instituted security measures and safeguards to protect our operational systems and information technology assets, including certain safeguards required by FERC. The security measures and safeguards we have implemented may not always be effective due to the evolving nature and sophistication of cyber attacks. Despite our implementation of security measures and safeguards, all of our information technology systems are vulnerable to disability, failures or unauthorized access, including cyber attacks. If our information technology systems were to fail or be breached by a cyber attack or a computer virus and be unable to be recoveredrecover in a timely way, we would be unable to fulfill critical business functions and sensitive confidential and other data could be compromised which could have a material adverse effect not only on our financial results, but on our public reputation as well.

Market performance or changes in other assumptions could require us to make significant unplanned contributions to our pension plansplan and other postretirement benefit plans. Increasing costs associated with our defined benefit retirement plans may adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

WeAs discussed in Note 8 to the to the Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have a defined benefit pension plan (the pension plan is closed to new employees and frozen for certain employees who did not meet age and service based criteria), defined post-retirement healthcare plan and a non-qualified retirement plan that covers a substantial portion of ourcover certain eligible employees. Assumptions related to future costs, return on investments, interest rates and other actuarial assumptions have a significant impact on our funding requirements and the expense recognized related to these plans. These estimates and assumptions may change based on actual return on plan assets, changes in interest rates and any changes in governmental regulations.



Increasing costs associated with our health care plans and other benefits may adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

The costs of providing health care benefits to our employees and retirees have increased substantially in recent years. We believe that our employee benefit costs, including costs related to health care plans for our employees and former employees, will continue to rise. Significant regulatory developments have, and likely will continue to, require changes to our current employee benefit plans and in our administrative and accounting processes, as well as changes to the cost of our plans, and the increasing costs and funding requirements associated with our health care plans may adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.



Our electric utility rates are regulated on a state-by-state basis by the relevant state regulatory authorities based on an analysis of our costs, as reviewed and approved in a regulatory proceeding. Within our utility rates we have generally recovered the cost of providing employee benefits. As benefit costs continue to rise, there can be no assurance that the state public utility commissions will allow recovery.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information regarding our legal proceedings is incorporated herein by reference to the “Legal Proceedings” sub caption within Item 8, Note 11, “Commitments and Contingencies,” of our Notes to Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS

All of our common stock is held by our parent company, Black Hills Corporation. Accordingly, there is no established trading market for our common stock.

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Significant Events

Name RebrandingSettlement

We now operateOn June 16, 2017, South Dakota Electric received approval from the SDPUC on a settlement reached with the trade name Black Hills EnergySDPUC staff agreeing to a six-year moratorium period effective July 1, 2017. As part of this agreement, South Dakota. BHC rebranded allDakota Electric will not increase base rates, absent an extraordinary event. The moratorium period also includes a suspension of its regulated utilitiesboth the TFA and the EIA, and a $1.0 million increase to operate under the name Black Hills Energy.annual power marketing margin guarantee during this period. Additionally, existing regulatory asset balances of approximately $13 million related to decommissioning and Winter Storm Atlas are being amortized over the moratorium period. These balances were previously amortized over a 10-year period ending September 30, 2024. The vegetation management regulatory asset of $14 million, previously unamortized, is being amortized over the moratorium period. The change in amortization periods for these costs increased annual amortization expense by approximately $2.7 million.

Regulatory MattersThe June 16, 2017 settlement had no impact to base rates.

DuringTransmission

Construction was completed on the first quarter of 2016, we commenced construction of the $54 million, 230-kV, 144 milemile-long transmission line that will connectconnecting the Teckla Substation in northeast Wyoming to the Lange Substation near Rapid City, South Dakota. The first segment of this project connecting Teckla to Osage, WyomingWY was energizedplaced in service on August 31, 2016. The second segment of the project is expectedconnecting Osage to beLange was placed in service in the first half ofon May 30, 2017.

On March 2, 2015, the SDPUC issued an order approving a rate stipulation and agreement authorizing an annual electric revenue increase for us of $6.9 million. The agreement was a Global Settlement and did not stipulate return on equity and capital structure. The SDPUC’s decision provides us a return on our investment in Cheyenne Prairie and associated infrastructure, and provides recovery of our share of operating expenses for this natural gas-fired facility. We implemented interim rates on October 1, 2014, coinciding with Cheyenne Prairie’s commercial operation date. Final rates were approved on April 1, 2015, effective October 1, 2014.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

The following discussion includes financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as another financial measure, gross margin, that is considered a “non-GAAP financial measure.” Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Gross margin (revenue less cost of sales) is a non-GAAP financial measure due to the exclusion of depreciation from the measure. The presentation of gross margin is intended to supplement investors’ understanding of our operating performance.

In our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations, gross margin is calculated as operating revenue less cost of fuel and purchased power. Our gross margin is impacted by the fluctuations in power purchases and natural gas and other fuel supply costs. However, while these fluctuating costs impact gross margin as a percentage of revenue, they only impact total gross margin if the costs cannot be passed through to our customers.

Our gross margin measure may not be comparable to other companies’ gross margin measure. Furthermore, this measure is not intended to replace operating income as determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of operating performance.



For the years ended December 31,2016Variance2015Variance20142017Variance2016Variance2015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Revenue$267,632
$(10,232)$277,864
$9,376
$268,488
$288,433
$20,801
$267,632
$(10,232)$277,864
Fuel and purchased power75,026
(8,313)83,339
(10,637)93,976
87,638
12,612
75,026
(8,313)83,339
Gross margin192,606
(1,919)194,525
20,013
174,512
200,795
8,189
192,606
(1,919)194,525
  
Operating expenses107,026
415
106,611
1,213
105,398
116,969
9,943
107,026
415
106,611
Operating income85,580
(2,334)87,914
18,800
69,114
83,826
(1,754)85,580
(2,334)87,914
  
Interest expense, net(20,192)982
(21,174)(1,472)(19,702)(20,380)(188)(20,192)982
(21,174)
Other income, net2,278
1,244
1,034
372
662
1,980
(298)2,278
1,244
1,034
Income tax expense(22,528)72
(22,600)(6,088)(16,512)(14,128)8,400
(22,528)72
(22,600)
Net income$45,138
$(36)$45,174
$11,612
$33,562
$51,298
$6,160
$45,138
$(36)$45,174

The following tables provide certain electric utility operating statistics for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
Revenue
Customer Base2016Percentage Change2015Percentage Change2014
Residential$72,084
(1)%$72,659
4 %$69,712
Commercial97,579
(3)%100,511
9 %91,882
Industrial33,409
 %33,336
17 %28,451
Municipal3,705
2 %3,626
6 %3,409
Total retail sales206,777
(2)%210,132
9 %193,454
Contract wholesale17,037
(3)%17,537
(17)%21,206
Wholesale off-system15,431
(34)%23,241
(17)%28,002
Total electric sales239,245
(5)%250,910
3 %242,662
Other revenue28,387
5 %26,954
4 %25,826
Total revenue$267,632
(4)%$277,864
3 %$268,488
2017 Compared to 2016

Gross margin increased over the prior year reflecting a $5.6 million increase in rider revenues primarily related to transmission investment recovery. Higher cooling and heating degree days and higher customer counts were slightly offset by lower usage per customer and lower commercial and industrial demand. Both heating and cooling degree days’ variances from normal were favorable when compared to prior year comparisons to normal.
MWh Sold
Customer Base2016Percentage Change2015Percentage Change2014
Residential520,798
 %521,828
(4)%542,008
Commercial783,319
(1)%792,466
1 %782,238
Industrial429,912
 %429,140
7 %399,648
Municipal33,591
5 %31,924
 %32,076
Total retail sales1,767,620
 %1,775,358
1 %1,755,970
Contract wholesale246,630
(5)%260,893
(23)%340,871
Wholesale off-system (a)
597,695
(29)%837,120
4 %808,257
Total electric sales2,611,945
(9)%2,873,371
(1)%2,905,098
Losses and company use155,370
(7)%167,332
(6)%177,577
Total energy2,767,315
(9)%3,040,703
(1)%3,082,675
_________________________
(a)Decrease in 2016 is driven by weaker market conditions

We own approximately 445 MWOperations and maintenance increased primarily due to $4.0 million in higher vegetation management expenses, $3.2 million in increased maintenance costs from higher outages, higher employee costs as a result of electric utility generating capacityprior year integration activities and purchase an additional 50 MW undertransition expenses charged to our Parent Company related to its prior year acquisition of SourceGas, and increased amortization expenses as a long-term agreement expiringresult of the SDPUC settlement.

Interest expense, net and other income, net were comparable to the same period in 2023. On March 21, 2014, we retired the Ben French, Neil Simpson I, and Osage coal-fired power plants. These three plants totaling 81 MW were closed because of federal environmental regulations. On October 1, 2014, we transferred the remaining net book value of these retired plantsprior year.

Income tax expense: The effective tax rate decreased in 2017 due to a regulatory assettax benefit of $6.0 million resulting from re-measurement of net deferred tax liabilities in accordance with an order granted by the SDPUC. These plants areASC 740 and the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017. This benefit was primarily replaced by our sharerelated to the repricing of Cheyenne Prairie.net operating losses and other tax basis items not included in the ratemaking construct.



Regulated Power Plant Fleet Availability201620152014
Coal-fired plants86.5%
(a) 
91.1%91.8% 
Other plants98.0% 96.0%91.5%
(b) 
Total availability93.0% 93.9%91.6% 
_________________________
(a)2016 reflects planned and unplanned outages.
(b)2014 reflects scheduled outages.
Resources2016Percentage Change2015Percentage Change2014
MWh generated:     
Coal1,467,403
(5)%1,537,744
(3)%1,591,061
Gas118,467
46 %80,944
80 %44,984
 1,585,870
(2)%1,618,688
(1)%1,636,045
      
MWh purchased1,181,445
(17)%1,422,015
(2)%1,446,630
Total resources2,767,315
(9)%3,040,703
(1)%3,082,675

Heating and Cooling Degree Days201620152014
Actual   
Heating degree days6,402
6,521
7,373
Cooling degree days646
577
481
    
Variance from 30-year average (a)
   
Heating degree days(10)%(8)%4 %
Cooling degree days(4)%(14)%(28)%
______________
(a)30-year average is from NOAA Climate Normals

2016 Compared to 2015

Gross margin decreased primarily due to a prior year return on invested capital of $1.2 million from a rate case, and a $1.3 million decrease due to third party billing true-ups related to the current and prior years, partially offset by the weather impact from the increase in cooling degree days compared to the same period in the prior year.

Operations and maintenance increased primarily due to higher depreciation expense driven by additional plant in service compared to the same period in the prior year, partially offset by lower employee costs driven by a change in operating expense allocations impacting us as a result of our Parent Company integrating the acquired SourceGas utilities.

Interest expense, net decreased primarily due to higher AFUDC income in the current year driven by higher construction work-in-process balances compared to the same period in the prior year.

Other income, net was comparable to the prior year.

Income tax expense: The 2016 effective tax rate is comparable to the prior year.



2015 Compared to 2014
The following tables provide certain electric utility operating statistics for the years ended December 31:
Revenue (in thousands)
Customer Base2017Percentage Change2016Percentage Change2015
Residential$72,764
1 %$72,084
(1)%$72,659
Commercial96,531
(1)%97,579
(3)%100,511
Industrial33,464
 %33,409
 %33,336
Municipal3,707
 %3,705
2 %3,626
Total retail sales206,466
 %206,777
(2)%210,132
Contract wholesale (a)
30,435
79 %17,037
(3)%17,537
Wholesale off-system14,271
(8)%15,431
(34)%23,241
Total electric sales251,172
5 %239,245
(5)%250,910
Other revenue (b)
37,261
31 %28,387
5 %26,954
Total revenue$288,433
8 %$267,632
(4)%$277,864
_________________________
(a)Increase in 2017 is primarily driven by resource needs from a new 50 MW power sales agreement effective January 1, 2017.
(b)Increase in 2017 is primarily due to higher transmission revenues.

Quantities sold (MWh)
Customer Base2017Percentage Change2016Percentage Change2015
Residential526,730
1 %520,798
 %521,828
Commercial769,463
(2)%783,319
(1)%792,466
Industrial430,301
 %429,912
 %429,140
Municipal33,272
(1)%33,591
5 %31,924
Total retail sales1,759,766
 %1,767,620
 %1,775,358
Contract wholesale (a)
722,659
193 %246,630
(5)%260,893
Wholesale off-system (b)
509,962
(15)%597,695
(29)%837,120
Total electric sales2,992,387
15 %2,611,945
(9)%2,873,371
Losses and company use (c)
195,005
26 %155,370
(7)%167,332
Total energy3,187,392
15 %2,767,315
(9)%3,040,703
_________________________
(a)Increase in 2017 is primarily driven by resource needs from a new 50 MW power sales agreement effective January 1, 2017.
(b)Decrease in 2017 was primarily driven by commodity prices that impacted power marketing sales.
(c)Includes company uses, line losses, and excess exchange production.

We own approximately 445 MW of electric utility generating capacity and purchase an additional 50 MW under a long-term agreement expiring in 2023.

Gross margin increased primarily due to a return on capital investments in Cheyenne Prairie which increased gross margins by $11.9 million and increased energy cost recoveries by $2.7 million. Retail margins increased $4.7 million primarily due to commercial and industrial load increases from higher MWh sold. These increases are partially offset by an approximately $1.7 million decrease in residential margins driven primarily by a 12% decrease in heating degree days compared to the same period in the prior year.
Regulated Power Plant Fleet Availability201720162015
Coal-fired plants (a)
86.0%86.5%91.1%
Other plants96.4%98.0%96.0%
Total availability91.6%93.0%93.9%
_________________________
(a)Both 2017 and 2016 included outages. 2017 included planned outages at Neil Simpson II, Wyodak and Wygen II, and 2016 included a planned outage at Wygen III and an extended planned outage at Wyodak.


Operations and maintenance increased reflecting an increase in depreciation expense primarily due to a higher asset base and amortization of regulatory plant decommissioning costs.
Quantities Generated and Purchased (MWh)2017Percentage Change2016Percentage Change2015
      
Coal-fired1,485,254
1 %1,467,403
(5)%1,537,744
Natural Gas (a)
96,661
(18)%118,467
46 %80,944
Total Generated1,581,915
 %1,585,870
(2)%1,618,688
      
Purchased (a) (b)
1,605,477
36 %1,181,445
(17)%1,422,015
Total Generated and Purchased (b)
3,187,392
15 %2,767,315
(9)%3,040,703
_________________________
(a)Change in 2017 is driven by the ability to purchase excess generation in the open market at a lower cost than to generate.
(b)Increase in 2017 is driven primarily by resource needs from a new 50 MW power sales agreement effective January 1, 2017.

Interest expense, net increased primarily due to interest costs from the $85 million of permanent financing put in place during the fourth quarter of 2014 for Cheyenne Prairie.

Heating and Cooling Degree Days201720162015
Actual   
Heating degree days6,870
6,402
6,521
Cooling degree days709
646
577
    
Variance from 30-year average (a)
   
Heating degree days(4)%(10)%(8)%
Cooling degree days11 %(4)%(14)%
Other income, net was comparable to the prior year.______________

Income tax expense: The 2015 effective tax rate is comparable to the prior year.
(a)30-year average is from NOAA Climate Normals

Credit Ratings

Credit ratings impact our ability to obtain short and long-term financing, the cost of such financing, and vendor payment terms, including collateral requirements. The following table represents our credit rating from each agency’s review which were in effect at December 31, 2016:2017:

Rating AgencyRating
S&PA-
Moody’sA1
FitchA

Critical Accounting Estimates

We prepare our financial statements in conformity with GAAP. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in application. There are also areas which require management’s judgment in selecting among available GAAP alternatives. We are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results may differ from our estimates and to the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected. We believe the following accounting estimates are the most critical in understanding and evaluating our reported financial results.

The following discussion of our critical accounting estimates should be read in conjunction with Note 1, “Business Description and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

The Company, asAs described in Note 8 of the Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, haswe have a defined benefit pension plan, a post-retirement healthcare plan and a non-qualified retirement plan. A Master Trust was established for the investment of assets of the defined benefit pension plan.

Accounting for pension and other postretirement benefit obligations involves numerous assumptions, the most significant of which relate to the discount rates, health care cost trend rates, expected return on plan assets, compensation increases, retirement rates and mortality rates. The determination of our obligation and expenses for pension and other postretirement benefits is dependent on the assumptions determined by management and used by actuaries in calculating the amounts. Although we believe our assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions may materially affect our pension and other postretirement obligations and our future expense.



The pension benefit cost for 20172018 for our non-contributory funded pension plan is expected to be approximately $0.6$1.3 million compared to $1.5$0.6 million in 2016.2017. The decreaseincrease in pension benefit cost is driven primarily by the merging of three of Black Hills Corporation’s defined benefit pension plans into one, improved mortality rates and better than expected return on plan assets partially offset by a decreasean increase in the discount rate.

Beginning in 2016, the Company changed the method used to estimate the service and interest cost components of the net periodic pension, supplemental non-qualified defined benefit and other postretirement benefit costs. The new method used the spot yield curve approach to estimate the service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used to determine the benefit obligations to relevant projected cash outflows. Prior to 2016, the service and interest costs were determined using a single weighted-average discount rate based on hypothetical AA Above Median yield curves used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. The change does not affect the measurement of the total benefit obligations as the change in service and interest costs offsets the actuarial gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive income.

The Company changed to the new method to provide a more precise measure of service and interest costs by improving the correlation between the projected benefit cash flows and the discrete spot yield curve rates. The Company accounted for this change as a change in estimate prospectively beginning in 2016.

The effect of hypothetical changes to selected assumptions on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans would be as follows in thousands of dollars:
December 31,
AssumptionsPercentage Change
December 31, 20162017
Increase/(Decrease)
PBO/APBO (a)
 
20172018
 Increase/(Decrease) Expense - Pretax
     
Pension    
Discount rate (b)
 +/- 0.5(3,658)(3,995)/4,0204,402 (854)(665)/803639
Expected return on assets +/- 0.5N/A (266)(284)/266284
     
OPEB    
Discount rate (b)
 
 +/- 0.5(211)(260)/225284 11/(12)9/(9)
Expected return on assets +/- 0.5N/A N/A
Health care cost trend rate (b)
 +/- 1.0125/(121)186/(174) 5/(5)21/(20)
__________________________
(a)Projected benefit obligation (PBO) for pension plans and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) for OPEB plans.
(b)Impact on service cost, interest cost and amortization of gains or losses.



Regulation

Our utility operations are subject to regulation with respect to rates, service area, accounting, and various other matters by state and federal regulatory authorities. The accounting regulations provide that rate-regulated public utilities account and report assets and liabilities consistent with the economic effects of the manner in which independent third-party regulators establish rates. Regulatory assets generally represent incurred or accrued costs that have been deferred when future recovery from customers is probable. Regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are expected to be refunded to customers in future rates or amounts collected in current rates for future costs.

Management continually assesses the probability of future recoveries and obligations associated with regulatory assets and liabilities. Factors such as the current regulatory environment, recently issued rate orders, and historical precedents are considered. As a result, we believe that the accounting prescribed under rate-based regulation remains appropriate and our regulatory assets are probable for recovery in current rates or in future rate proceedings.



Unbilled Revenue

Revenues attributable to energy delivered to customers, but not yet billed under the cycle billing method, are estimated and accrued and the related costs are charged to expense. Factors influencing the determination of unbilled revenues may include estimates of delivered sales volumes based on weather information and customer consumption trends.

Income Taxes

We file a federal income tax return with other members of the Parent consolidated group. For financial statement purposes, federal income taxes are allocated to the individual companies based on amounts calculated on a separate return basis.

We useOn December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the TCJA. The TCJA makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including, but not limited to reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. The Company uses the asset and liability method ofin accounting for income taxes. Under thisthe asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized at currently enacted income tax rates, to reflect the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial and tax basis of assets and liabilities as well as net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Such temporary differences are the result of provisions in the income tax law that either require or permit certain items to be reported on the income tax return in a different period than they are reported in the financial statements. As such, the Company has revalued the deferred income taxes at the 21% federal tax rate as of December 31, 2017 and as a result, deferred tax assets and liabilities were reduced by approximately $103 million. Of the $103 million, approximately $97 million is related to our regulated utilities and was reclassified to a regulatory liability. This regulatory liability will generally be amortized over the remaining life of the related assets using the normalization principles as specifically prescribed in the TCJA.

As allowed under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), the Company has recorded provisional income tax amounts as of December 31, 2017 for changes pursuant to the TCJA related to depreciation for which the impacts could not be finalized upon issuance of the Company’s financial statements, but reasonable estimates could be determined.  The provisional amounts may change as the Company finalizes the analysis and computations and such changes could be material to the Company’s future results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized and provides any necessary valuation allowances as required. If we determine that we will be unable to realize all or part of our deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. Although we believe our assumptions, judgments and estimates are reasonable, changes in tax laws or our interpretations of tax laws and the resolution of current and any future tax audits could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in our financial statements.

See Note 6 of the Notes to Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.



ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



 Page
  
Management’s Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
Statements of Income for the three years ended December 31, 20162017
  
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three years ended December 31, 20162017
  
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20162017 and 20152016
  
Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 20162017
  
Statements of Common Stockholder’s Equity for the three years ended December 31, 20162017
  
Notes to Financial Statements




Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of Black Hills Power is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162017, based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 20162017.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting because this requirement is inapplicable to companies such as ours which are known as non-accelerated filers.

Black Hills Power








REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholder and the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
Black Hills Power, Inc.
Rapid City, South Dakota
Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Black Hills Power, Inc. (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015, and2016, the related statements of income, comprehensive income, (loss), common stockholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included2017, the financial statementrelated notes, and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audits, included considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Black Hills Power, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 28, 201726, 2018

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.



BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Years ended December 31,201620152014201720162015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
  
Revenue$267,632
$277,864
$268,488
$288,433
$267,632
$277,864
  
Operating expenses:  
Fuel and purchased power75,026
83,339
93,976
87,638
75,026
83,339
Operations and maintenance66,384
68,088
70,356
74,064
66,384
68,088
Depreciation and amortization34,030
32,552
29,100
35,862
34,030
32,552
Taxes - property6,612
5,971
5,942
7,043
6,612
5,971
Total operating expenses182,052
189,950
199,374
204,607
182,052
189,950
  
Operating income85,580
87,914
69,114
83,826
85,580
87,914
  
Other income (expense):  
Interest expense(22,908)(22,337)(20,569)(22,421)(22,908)(22,337)
AFUDC - borrowed1,140
506
248
1,137
1,140
506
Interest income1,576
657
619
904
1,576
657
AFUDC - equity2,165
918
519
2,165
2,165
918
Other expense(185)(117)(105)(300)(185)(117)
Other income298
233
248
115
298
233
Total other income (expense)(17,914)(20,140)(19,040)(18,400)(17,914)(20,140)
  
Income before income taxes67,666
67,774
50,074
65,426
67,666
67,774
Income tax expense(22,528)(22,600)(16,512)(14,128)(22,528)(22,600)
  
Net income$45,138
$45,174
$33,562
$51,298
$45,138
$45,174


The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.




BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years ended December 31,201620152014
 (in thousands)
    
Net income$45,138
$45,174
$33,562
    
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:   
Benefit plan liability adjustments - net gain (loss) (net of tax of $27, $(36) and $189, respectively)(50)68
(351)
Reclassification adjustment of benefit plan liability - net gain (loss) (net of tax of $(29), $(33) and $(16), respectively)53
61
29
Reclassification adjustment of cash flow hedges settled and included in net income (loss) (net of tax of $(22), $319 and $(364), respectively)42
383
(300)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax45
512
(622)
    
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax$45,183
$45,686
$32,940
Years ended December 31,201720162015
 (in thousands)
    
Net income$51,298
$45,138
$45,174
    
Other comprehensive income (loss):   
Benefit plan liability adjustments - net gain (loss) (net of tax of $50, $27 and $(36), respectively)(94)(50)68
Reclassification adjustment of benefit plan liability - net gain (loss) (net of tax of $(30), $(29) and $(33), respectively)56
53
61
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:   
Reclassification of net realized (gains) losses on settled/amortized interest rate swaps (net of tax of $(22), $(22) and $319, respectively)42
42
383
Other comprehensive income4
45
512
    
Comprehensive income$51,302
$45,183
$45,686


See Note 7 for additional disclosure related to comprehensive income.

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.


BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31,2016201520172016
(in thousands, except share amounts)(in thousands, except share amounts)
ASSETS  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$234
$297
$16
$234
Receivables - customers, net30,614
27,856
29,050
30,614
Receivables - affiliates9,526
6,734
5,664
9,526
Other receivables, net351
236
196
351
Money pool notes receivable28,409
76,813

28,409
Materials, supplies and fuel22,389
24,282
23,443
22,389
Regulatory assets, current18,119
14,096
18,993
18,119
Other current assets3,876
43,118
4,528
3,876
Total current assets113,518
193,432
81,890
113,518
  
Investments4,841
4,725
4,926
4,841
  
Property, plant and equipment1,236,387
1,166,126
1,311,819
1,236,387
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(338,828)(326,074)(358,946)(338,828)
Total property, plant and equipment, net897,559
840,052
952,873
897,559
  
Other assets:  
Regulatory assets, non-current74,015
71,717
59,710
74,015
Other, non-current assets3,816
152
3,747
3,816
Total other assets77,831
71,869
63,457
77,831
TOTAL ASSETS$1,093,749
$1,110,078
$1,103,146
$1,093,749

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.



BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
(Continued)

As of December 31,2016201520172016
(in thousands, except share amounts)(in thousands, except share amounts)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY  
Current liabilities:  
Accounts payable$14,158
$14,472
$14,766
$14,158
Accounts payable - affiliates31,799
30,582
25,653
31,799
Money pool note payable13,397

Accrued liabilities37,436
69,454
38,205
37,436
Regulatory liabilities, current84

842
84
Total current liabilities83,477
114,508
92,863
83,477
  
Long-term debt339,756
339,616
339,895
339,756
  
Deferred credits and other liabilities:  
Deferred income tax liabilities, net211,443
188,961
110,618
211,443
Regulatory liabilities, non-current53,866
51,583
148,013
53,866
Benefit plan liabilities19,544
20,033
16,285
19,544
Other, non-current liabilities1,001
3,398
1,240
1,001
Total deferred credits and other liabilities285,854
263,975
276,156
285,854
  
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 4, 8, 9 and 11)

  
Stockholder’s equity:  
Common stock $1 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 23,416,396 shares issued23,416
23,416
23,416
23,416
Additional paid-in capital39,575
39,575
39,575
39,575
Retained earnings322,933
330,295
332,499
322,933
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,262)(1,307)(1,258)(1,262)
Total stockholder’s equity384,662
391,979
394,232
384,662
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY$1,093,749
$1,110,078
$1,103,146
$1,093,749

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.


BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years ended December 31,201620152014201720162015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Operating activities:  
Net income$45,138
$45,174
$33,562
$51,298
$45,138
$45,174
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities -  
Depreciation and amortization34,030
32,552
29,100
35,862
34,030
32,552
Deferred income taxes20,690
7,690
16,518
1,004
20,690
7,690
AFUDC - equity(2,165)(918)(519)(2,165)(2,165)(918)
Employee benefits1,770
2,403
1,295
817
1,770
2,403
Other adjustments391
232
(2,330)2,429
391
232
Change in operating assets and liabilities -  
Accounts receivable and other current assets(3,963)(3,223)(10,412)3,287
(3,963)(3,223)
Accounts payable and other current liabilities6,175
20,455
7,210
(7,254)6,175
20,455
Contributions to defined benefit pension plan(820)
(1,696)
Regulatory assets(4,023)(3,839)(5,366)978
(4,023)(3,839)
Regulatory liabilities
(2,479)2,479


(2,479)
Contributions to defined benefit pension plan(4,000)(820)
Other operating activities(8,339)(5,680)(6,624)(1,853)(8,339)(5,680)
Net cash provided by operating activities88,884
92,367
63,217
80,403
88,884
92,367
  
Investing activities:  
Property, plant and equipment additions(84,750)(56,795)(82,826)(79,566)(84,750)(56,795)
Notes receivable from affiliate companies, net(4,095)(36,687)(51,334)
(4,095)(36,687)
Other investing activities(102)(128)(154)(861)(102)(128)
Net cash (used in) investing activities(88,947)(93,610)(134,314)(80,427)(88,947)(93,610)
  
Financing activities:  
Long-term debt - repayments

(12,200)
Long-term debt - issuance

85,000
Notes payable from affiliate companies, net(194)

Other financing activities
(2)(961)

(2)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
(2)71,839
(194)
(2)
  
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(63)(1,245)742
(218)(63)(1,245)
  
Cash and cash equivalents: 
Beginning of year297
1,542
800
End of year$234
$297
$1,542
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year234
297
1,542
Cash and cash equivalents end of year$16
$234
$297

See Note 10 for Supplemental Cash Flows information.

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.


BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

201620152014201720162015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Common stock shares:  
Balance beginning of year23,416
23,416
23,416
23,416
23,416
23,416
Issuance of common stock





Balance end of year23,416
23,416
23,416
23,416
23,416
23,416
  
Common stock amounts:  
Balance beginning of year$23,416
$23,416
$23,416
$23,416
$23,416
$23,416
Issuance of common stock





Balance end of year$23,416
$23,416
$23,416
$23,416
$23,416
$23,416
  
Additional paid-in capital:  
Balance beginning of year$39,575
$39,575
$39,575
$39,575
$39,575
$39,575
Issuance of common stock





Balance end of year$39,575
$39,575
$39,575
$39,575
$39,575
$39,575
  
Retained earnings:  
Balance beginning of year$330,295
$313,622
$280,060
$322,933
$330,295
$313,622
Net income45,138
45,174
33,562
51,298
45,138
45,174
Non-cash dividend to Parent company(52,500)(28,501)
(42,000)(52,500)(28,501)
Adjustment for Transfer of Utility Money Pool268


Balance end of year$322,933
$330,295
$313,622
$332,499
$322,933
$330,295
  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:  
Balance beginning of year$(1,307)$(1,819)$(1,197)$(1,262)$(1,307)$(1,819)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax45
512
(622)4
45
512
Balance end of year$(1,262)$(1,307)$(1,819)$(1,258)$(1,262)$(1,307)
  
Total stockholder’s equity$384,662
$391,979
$374,794
$394,232
$384,662
$391,979

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 20162017, 20152016 and 20142015


(1)    BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business Description

Black Hills Power, Inc., doing business as Black Hills Energy - South Dakota Electric (the Company, “we,” “us” or “our”) is a regulated electric utility serving customers in South Dakota, Wyoming and Montana. We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of BHC or the Parent, a public registrant listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements include the accounts of Black Hills Power, Inc. and also our ownership interests in the assets, liabilities and expenses of our jointly owned facilities (Note 3) and are prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Revisions

Certain revisions have been made to prior years’ financial information to conform to the current year presentation.

We revised our presentation of cash and book overdrafts and certain cash transactions processed on behalf of affiliates.  For accounts with the same financial institution where there is a banking arrangement that clears payments with balances in other bank accounts, book overdrafts are presented on a combined basis by bank as cash and cash equivalents. Cash collected or disbursed on behalf of affiliates is presented as Receivables - affiliates or Accounts Payable - affiliates. Prior year amounts were corrected to conform to the current year presentation, which decreased cash and cash equivalents by $7.3 million, $5.1 million and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively; increased Receivables - affiliates by $1.0 million, increased Accounts payable - affiliates by $0.6 million and decreased Accounts payable by $6.9 million as of December 31, 2015. It also decreased net cash flows provided by operations by $2.2 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively. We assessed the materiality of these changes, taking into account quantitative and qualitative factors, and determined them to be immaterial to the balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 and to the statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. There is no impact to the Statements of Income, Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) or Statements of Common Stockholder’s Equity for any period reported.

Use of Estimates and Basis of Presentation

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. ActualChanges in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates and actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Regulatory Accounting

Our regulated electric operations are subject to regulation by various state and federal agencies. The accounting policies followed are generally subject to the Uniform System of Accounts of FERC.

Our regulated utility operations follow accounting standards for regulated operations and our financial statements reflect the effects of the different rate making principles followed by the various jurisdictions regulating our electric operations. If rate recovery becomes unlikely or uncertain due to competition or regulatory action, these accounting standards may no longer apply which could require these net regulatory
assets to our regulated operations.be charged to current income or OCI. Our regulatory assets represent amounts for which we will recover the cost, but
generally are not allowed a return, except as described below. In the event we determine that weour regulated net assets no longer
meet the criteria for following accounting standards for regulated operations, the accounting impact to us could be an extraordinary non-cash charge to operations, in an amount thatwhich could be material.



Regulatory assets are included in Regulatory assets, current and Regulatory assets, non-current on the accompanying Balance Sheets. Regulatory liabilities are included in Regulatory liabilities, current and Regulatory liabilities, non-current on the accompanying Balance Sheets.
We had the following regulatory assets and liabilities as follows as of December 31 (in thousands):
Maximum Recovery Period (in years)20162015Maximum Amortization (in years)20172016
Regulatory assets:  
Regulatory assets  
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt (a)
8$1,815
$2,096
7$1,534
$1,815
Deferred taxes on AFUDC (b)
459,367
8,571
455,095
9,367
Employee benefit plans (c)
1220,100
20,866
1219,465
20,100
Deferred energy costs (a)
123,016
19,875
Deferred energy and fuel cost adjustments - current (a)
114,066
18,119
Deferred gas cost adjustments (a)
15,536
4,897
Deferred taxes on flow through accounting (a)
3512,545
12,104
547,579
12,545
Decommissioning costs (b)
812,456
13,686
Decommissioning costs, net of amortization (d)
610,252
12,456
Vegetation management, net of amortization (d)
612,669
12,109
Other regulatory assets (a) (d)
212,835
8,615
62,507
726
Total regulatory assets $92,134
$85,813
   $78,703
$92,134
Regulatory liabilities:  
  
Regulatory liabilities  
Cost of removal for utility plant (a)
61$41,541
$38,131
61$44,056
$41,541
Employee benefit plans (c)
1212,304
12,616
Employee benefit plans and related deferred taxes (c)
126,808
12,304
Excess deferred income taxes (c) (e)
4097,101

Other regulatory liabilities (c)
13105
836
13890
105
Total regulatory liabilities $53,950
$51,583
 $148,855
$53,950
____________________
(a)    Recovery of costs but we are not allowed a rate of return.
(b)In addition to recovery of costs, we are allowed a rate of return.
(c)In addition to recovery or repayment of costs, we are allowed a return on a portion of this amount or a reduction in rate base, respectively.base.
(d)IncludesIn accordance with a settlement agreement approved by the SDPUC on June 16, 2017, the amortization of South Dakota Electric’s decommissioning costs of approximately $11 million, vegetation management expensecosts of approximately $12.0$14 million, and $5.0Winter Storm Atlas costs of approximately $2.0 million are being amortized over 6 years, effective July 1, 2017. Decommissioning costs and Winter Storm Atlas costs were previously amortized over a 10 year period ending September 30, 2024. The vegetation management costs were previously unamortized. The change in 2016amortization periods for these costs increased annual amortization expense by approximately $2.7 million.
(e)The increase in the regulatory tax liability is primarily related to the revaluation of deferred income tax balances at the lower income tax rate. As of December 31, 2017, all of the liability has been classified as non-current due to uncertainties around the timing and 2015, respectively.other regulatory decisions that will affect the amount of regulatory tax liability amortized and returned to customers through rate reductions or other revenue offsets in 2018.

Regulatory assets represent items we expect to recover from customers through probable future increases in rates.

Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt - The early redemption premium on reacquired debt is being amortized over the remaining term of the original bonds.

Deferred Taxes on AFUDC - The equity component of AFUDC is considered a permanent difference for tax purposes with the tax benefit being flowed through to customers as prescribed or allowed by regulators. If, based on a regulator’s action, it is probable the utility will recover the future increase in taxes payable represented by this flow-through treatment through a rate revenue increase, a regulatory asset is recognized. This regulatory asset itself is a temporary difference for which a deferred tax liability must be recognized. Accounting standards for income taxes specifically address AFUDC-equity, and require a gross-up of such amounts to reflect the revenue requirement associated with a rate-regulated environment.

Employee Benefit Plans - Employee benefit plans include the unrecognized prior service costs and net actuarial loss associated with our defined benefit pension plansplan and post-retirement benefit plans in regulatory assets rather than in accumulated other comprehensive income. In addition, this regulatory asset includes the income tax effect of the


adjustment required under accounting for compensation-defined benefit plans to record the full pension and post-retirement benefit obligations. Such amounts have been grossed-up to reflect the revenue requirement associated with a rate regulated environment.

Deferred Energy Costsand Fuel Cost Adjustments - Current - Deferred energy and fuel cost adjustments represent the cost of electricity delivered to our utility customers that areis either higher or lower than the current rates and will be recovered or refunded in future rates. Deferred energy and fuel cost adjustments are recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the appropriate state commission. We file periodic quarterly, semi-annual and/or annual filings to recover these costs based on the respective cost mechanisms approved by the applicable state utility commissions.


Deferred Gas Cost Adjustment - We have GCA provisions that allow us to pass the cost of gas on to our customers. The GCA is based on forecasts of the upcoming gas costs and recovery or refund of prior under-recovered or over-recovered costs. To the extent that gas costs are under-recovered or over-recovered, they are recorded as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively. We file periodic estimates of future gas costs based on market forecasts with state utility commissions

Deferred Taxes on Flow-Through Accounting - Under flow-through accounting, the income tax effects of certain tax items are reflected in our cost of service for the customer in the year in which the tax benefits are realized and result in lower utility rates. This regulatory treatment was applied to the tax benefit generated by repair costs that were previously capitalized for tax purposes in a rate case settlement that was reached in 2010. In this instance, the agreed upon rate increase was less than it would have been absent the flow-through treatment. A regulatory asset was established to reflect thethat future increases in income taxes payable will be recovered from customers as the temporary differences reverse. As a result of this regulatory treatment, we continue to record a tax benefit consistent with the flow-through method with respect tofor costs considered repairscurrently deductible for tax purposes, andbut are capitalized for book purposes.

Decommissioning Costs - We received approval in 2014 for regulatory treatment on the remaining net book values and decommissioning costs of our decommissioned coal plants.

Vegetation Management Costs - We received approval in 2013 for regulatory treatment on vegetation management maintenance costs for our distribution system rights-of-way.

Regulatory liabilities represent items we expect to refund to customers through probable future decreases in rates.

Cost of Removal for Utility Plant - Cost of removal for utility plant represents the estimated cumulative net provisions for future removal costs included in depreciation expense for which there is no legal obligation for removal.

Employee Benefit Plans - Employee benefit plans represent the cumulative excess of pension and retiree healthcare costs recovered in rates over pension expense recorded in accordance with accounting standards for compensation - retirement benefits. In addition, this regulatory liability includes the income tax effect of the adjustment required under accounting for compensation - defined benefit plans, to record the full pension and post-retirement benefit obligations. Such income tax effect has been grossed-up to account for the revenue requirement aspect ofassociated with a rate regulated environment.

Excess Deferred Income Taxes - The revaluation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities due to the passage of the TCJA is recorded as an excess deferred income tax to be refunded to customers primarily using the normalization principles as prescribed in the TCJA.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable consists of sales to residential, commercial, industrial, municipal and other customers all of which do not bear interest. These accounts receivable are stated at billed and unbilled amounts net of write-offs or payment received.

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts which reflects our best estimate of uncollectible trade receivables. We regularly review our trade receivable allowances by considering such factors as historical experience, credit worthiness, the age of the receivable balances and current economic conditions that may affect collectibility. The

In specific cases where we are aware of a customer’s inability or reluctance to pay, we record an allowance is calculated by applying estimated write-off factorsfor doubtful accounts to various classes of outstanding receivables, including unbilled revenue. The write-off factors usedreduce the net receivable balance to estimate uncollectible accounts are based upon consideration of both historical collections experience and management’s bestthe amount we reasonably expect to collect. However, if circumstances change, our estimate of future collection success given the existing collections environment.recoverability of accounts receivable could be affected. Circumstances which could affect our estimates include, but are not limited to, customer credit issues, the level of commodity prices, customer deposits and general economic conditions. Accounts are written off once they are deemed to be uncollectible or the time allowed for dispute under the contract has expired.




Following is a summary of accounts receivable atas of December 31 (in thousands):
 20162015
Accounts receivable trade$16,972
$15,268
Unbilled revenues13,799
12,795
Allowance for doubtful accounts(157)(207)
Net accounts receivable trade$30,614
$27,856
 20172016
Accounts receivable, trade$15,994
$16,972
Unbilled revenue13,280
13,799
Less Allowance for doubtful accounts(224)(157)
Accounts receivable, net$29,050
$30,614

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement with a fixed or determinable price and delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, and collectibility is reasonably assured.rendered. Sales and franchise taxes collected from our customers isare recorded on a net basis (excluded from Revenue).

Utility revenues are based on authorized rates approved by the state regulatory agencies and the FERC. Revenues related to the sale, transmission and distribution of energy, and delivery of service are generally recorded when service is rendered or energy is delivered to customers. To the extent that deliveries have occurred but a bill has not been issued, weour utilities accrue an estimate of the revenue since the latest billing. This estimate is calculated based upon several factors including billings through the last billing cycle in a month and prices in effect in our jurisdictions. Each month a true-up of the estimated unbilled revenue amounts are trued-up and recorded in Receivables- customers,Accounts receivable, net on the accompanying Balance Sheets.


For long-term non-regulated power sales agreements, revenue is recognized either in accordance with accounting standards for revenue recognition, or in accordance with accounting standards for leases, as appropriate. Under accounting standards for revenue recognition, revenue is generally recognized as the lesser of the amount billed or the average rate expected over the life of the agreement.

Materials, Supplies and Fuel

Materials, supplies and fuel used for construction, operation and maintenance purposes are generally stated on arecorded using the weighted-average cost basis.

Other Current Assets

The following amounts by major classification are included in Other current assets on the accompanying Balance Sheets as of (in thousands):
 December 31, 2016December 31, 2015
Accrued receivables related to litigation expenses and settlements$
$39,050
Other (none of which is individually significant)3,876
4,068
Total other current assets$3,876
$43,118
method.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the termestimated useful life of the related debt. Deferred financing costs are presented on the balance sheet as an adjustment to the related debt liabilities.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost when placed in service.cost. Included in the cost of regulated construction projects is AFUDC, when applicable, which represents the approximate composite cost of borrowed funds and a return on equity used to finance a regulated utility project. We also capitalize interest, when applicable, on undeveloped leasehold costs and certain non-regulated construction projects. In addition, asset retirement costs associated with tangible long-lived regulated utility assets are recognized as liabilities with an increase to the carrying amounts of the related long-lived regulated utility assets in the period incurred. The amounts capitalized are included in Property, plant and equipment on the accompanying Balance Sheets.

The cost of regulated electricutility property, plant and equipment retired, or otherwise disposed of in the ordinary course of business, less salvage plus retirement costs, is charged to accumulated depreciation. RemovalEstimated removal costs associated with non-legal retirement obligations related to our regulated electric properties are reclassified from accumulated depreciation and reflected as regulatory liabilities. Ordinary repairs and maintenance of property, except as allowed under rate regulations, are charged to operations as incurred.

Property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment when it is determined that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. A loss is recognized in the current period if it becomes probable that part of a cost of a plant under construction or recently completed plant will be disallowed for recovery from customers and a reasonable estimate of the disallowance can be


made. For investments in property, plant and equipment that are abandoned and not expected to go into service, incurred costs and related deferred tax amounts are compared to the discounted estimated future rate recovery, and a loss is recognized, if necessary.

Depreciation provisions for regulated electric property, plant and equipment are computed on a straight-line basis using an annual composite rate of 2.1% in 2.2%2017, 2.2% in 2016, and 2.3% in 2015 and 2.3% in 2014.2015.

Accrued Liabilities

The following amounts by major classification are included in Accrued liabilities on the accompanying Balance Sheets as of December 31 (in thousands):
December 31, 2016December 31, 201520172016
Accrued employee compensation, benefits and withholdings$4,783
$5,054
$4,305
$4,783
Accrued property taxes5,522
4,962
5,930
5,522
Accrued payments related to litigation expenses and settlements
38,750
Accrued income taxes17,069
13,031
17,472
17,069
Customer deposits and prepayments2,825
2,216
4,863
2,825
Accrued interest and contract adjustment payments4,614
4,600
Accrued interest4,708
4,614
Other (none of which is individually significant)2,623
841
927
2,623
Total accrued liabilities$37,436
$69,454
$38,205
$37,436

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

From time to time we utilize risk management contracts including forward purchases and sales to hedge the price of fuel for our combustion turbines and fixed-for-float swaps to fix the interest on any variable rate debt. Contracts that qualify as derivatives underThe accounting standards for derivatives and hedging require that are not exempted such as normal purchase/normal sale, are required toderivative instruments be recorded inon the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. Accounting standards for derivatives require thatvalue and changes in the derivative instrument’s fair valueinstruments be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.met and designated accordingly, including the normal purchase and normal sales exception.  Changes in the fair value for derivative instruments that do not meet this exception are recognized in the income statement as they occur.

Accounting standards for derivatives allow hedge accounting for qualifying fair value and cash flow hedges. GainFrom time to time we utilize risk management contracts including interest rate swaps to fix the interest on variable rate debt, or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a fair value hedging instrument as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk should be recognized currently in earningslock in the same accounting period. Conversely,Treasury yield component associated with anticipated issuance of senior notes.  For swaps that settled in connection with the issuance of senior debt, the effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedging instrument should be reportedis deferred as a component in AOCI and recognized as interest expense over the life of other comprehensive income and be reclassified into earnings or as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability, netthe senior note. As of tax, in the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument, if any, is recognized currently in earnings.December 31, 2017, we have no outstanding interest rate swap agreements.

Revenues and expenses on contracts that qualify are designated as derivatives may be elected to be accounted for under the normal purchases and normal sales exception and are recognized when the underlying physical transaction is completed under the accrual basis of accounting.  Normal purchases and normal sales are contracts where physical delivery is probable, quantities are expected to be used or sold in the normal course of business over a reasonable amount of time, and price is not tied to an unrelated underlying derivative. As part of our regulated electric operations, we enter into contracts to buy and sell energy to meet the requirements of our customers.  These contracts include short-term and long-term commitments to purchase and sell energy in the retail and wholesale markets with the intent and ability to deliver or take delivery.  If it was determined that a transaction designated as a normal purchase or normal sale no longer met the exceptions,exception, the fair value of the related contract would be reflected as either an asset or liability, under the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging.

Fair Value Measurements

Accounting standards for fair value measurements provide a single definition of fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement dateAssets and also requires disclosures and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values giving the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following threefair value categories:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical
unrestricted assets or liabilities. This level primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded securities or
listed derivatives.

Level 2 - Pricing inputs include quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the
asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other
means.



Level 3 - Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs
reflect management’s best estimate of fair value using its own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would
use in pricing the asset or liability.

ImpairmentAssets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of Long-Lived Assetsinput that is significant to the fair value

We periodically evaluate whether eventsmeasurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and circumstances have occurred which may affect the estimated useful life orplacement within the recoverabilityfair value hierarchy levels. We record transfers, if necessary, between levels at the end of the remaining balancereporting period for all of our long-lived assets. If such events or circumstances were to indicate that the carrying amount of these assets was not recoverable, we would estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) was less than the carrying amount of the long-lived assets, we would recognize an impairment loss.financial instruments.

Transfers into Level 3, if any, occur when significant inputs used to value the derivative instruments become less observable
such as a significant decrease in the frequency and volume in which the instrument is traded, negatively impacting the
availability of observable pricing inputs. Transfers out of Level 3, if any, occur when the significant inputs become more
observable such as the time between the valuation date and the delivery date of a transaction becomes shorter, positively
impacting the availability of observable pricing inputs.

Additional information is included in Note 5.

Income Taxes

We file a federal income tax return with other members of the Parent’s consolidated group. For financial statement purposes, federal income taxes are allocated to the individual companies based on amounts calculated on a separate return basis.

We useOn December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the TCJA. The TCJA makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including, but not limited to reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. The Company uses the asset and liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized at currently enacted income tax rates, to reflect the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial and tax basis of assets and liabilities as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Such temporary differences are the result of provisions in the income tax law that either require or permit certain items to be reported on the income tax return in a different period than they are reported in the financial statements. As such, the Company has remeasured the deferred income taxes at the 21% federal tax rate as of December 31, 2017.

We use the deferral method of accounting for investment tax credits as allowed by our rate-regulated jurisdictions. Such a method results in the investment tax credit being amortized as a reduction to income tax expense over the estimated useful lives of the underlying property that gave rise to the credit.

We recognize interest income or interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters in Income tax (expense) benefit on the Statements of Income.

We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting standards for income taxes. The unrecognized tax benefit is classified in Other, non-current liabilities on the accompanying Balance Sheets. See Note 6 for additional information.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards

Revenue from Contracts with Customers, ASU 2014-09

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard provides companies with a single model for use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific revenue guidance. The core principle of the model is to recognize revenue when control of the goods or services transfers to the customer. The new disclosure requirements will provide information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from revenue contracts with customers. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach to adopting this guidance. Under the modified approach, an entity would recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance with an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.



We have implemented this standard effective January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis. We have completed our assessment of all revenue from existing contracts with customers and there is no significant impact to our revenue recognition practices, financial position, results of operations or cash flows. A majority of our revenues are from regulated tariff offerings that provide electricity with a defined contractual term, generally limited to the services requested and received to date for such arrangements. For such arrangements, the performance obligation transfer of control and revenue recognition occurs when the electricity is delivered, consistent with the previous revenue recognition guidance. The same transfer of control and revenue recognition based on delivery principles also apply to our revenue contracts for wholesale and off-system power sales arrangements, and other non-regulated services. Therefore, we did not have a cumulative adjustment to Retained earnings or an impact on our revenue recognition policies as a result of the adoption of the new standard. The new standard will require us to provide more robust disclosures than required by previous guidance, including disclosures related to disaggregation of revenue into appropriate categories, performance obligations, and the judgments made in revenue recognition determinations.

Compensation - Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost, ASU 2017-07

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost. The changes to the standard require employers to report the service cost component in the same line item(s) as other compensation costs, and require the other components of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component may be eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. This ASU will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. This new guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. We have implemented this standard effective January 1, 2018. We will capitalize the other components of net periodic benefit costs into regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities and maintain a FERC to GAAP reporting difference for these capitalized costs. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and post-retirement costs will result in offsetting changes to Operating income and Other income, which are not expected to be material.

Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, ASU 2016-15

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). This ASU requires changes in the presentation of certain items, including but not limited to, debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies and distributions received from equity method investees. The ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017., 2017. We will usehave implemented this standard effective January 1, 2018 on the retrospective transition method to adopt this standard with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.The adoption of thismethod. This standard will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations andor cash flows.

Leases, ASU 2016-02

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes ASC 840, Leases. This ASU requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for allmost leases, with termswhereas today only financing-type lease liabilities (capital leases) are recognized on the balance sheet. In addition, the definition of more than 12 months. Lessees are permitteda lease has been revised in regards to makewhen an accounting policy electionarrangement conveys the right to not recognizecontrol the use of the identified asset and liability for leases withunder the arrangement which may result in changes to the classification of an arrangement as a term of 12 months or less.lease. The ASU does not significantly change the lessees’ recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows from the previous accounting standard. Lessors’ accounting under the ASCASU is largely unchanged from the previous accounting standard. In addition, theThe ASU expands the disclosure requirements of lease arrangements. LesseesUnder current guidance, lessees and lessors will use a modified retrospective transition approach, which includes a numberrequires application of practical expedients.the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the year of adoption. The guidance is effective for us beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the impact that adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent), ASU 2015-07

On May 1, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent). This ASU removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedientinterim and also removes certain disclosure requirements. The new requirements were effective for us beginning January 1, 2016 and were applied retrospectively to all periods presented, in our 2016 Form 10-K. This ASU did not materially affect our financial statements and disclosures, but did change certain presentation and disclosure of the fair value of certain plan assets in our pension and other postretirement benefit plan disclosures in our 2016 Form 10-K, for all periods presented.



Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, ASU 2015-03

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. Debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability will be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability, similar to the presentation of debt discounts, rather than as an asset. Amortization of these costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. ASU 2015-03 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. We adopted ASU 2015-03 in the first quarter of 2016 on a retrospective basis. As of December 31, 2016, we presented the debt issuance costs, previously reported in other assets, as direct deductions from the carrying amount of long-term debt. The implementation of this standard resulted in reductions of other assets, non-current and long-term debt of approximately $3.1 million in the Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015.

Revenue from Contracts2018, with Customers, ASU 2014-09
early adoption permitted. In May 2014,January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard provides companies with a single model for use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific revenue guidance. The core principle of the model is to recognize revenue when control of the goods or services transfersamendments to the customer. The new disclosure requirements will provide information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from revenue contracts with customers. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption on January 1, 2017 permitted. Entities will have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach to adopting this guidance. Under the modified approach,lease standard, ASU No. 2018-01, allowing an entity would recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance with an adjustmentto elect not to assess whether certain land easements are, or contain, leases when transitioning to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.new lease standard.

We willcurrently expect to adopt this standard on January 1, 2019 and anticipate electing the transition approach to not assess existing or expired land easements that were not previously accounted for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and are actively assessing all of our sources of revenueas a lease. We continue to determineevaluate the impact that adoption of the this


new standard will have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Our evaluation includes identifying revenue streams by like contracts to allow for ease of implementation. A majority of our revenues are from regulated tariff offerings that provide electricity with a defined contractual term. For such arrangements, we expect that the revenue from contracts with the customer will be equivalent to the electricity delivered in that period. Therefore, we do not expect that there will be a significant shift in the timing or pattern of revenue recognition for regulated tariff-based sales. The evaluation of other revenue streams is ongoing, including those tied to longer term contractual commitments. However, a number of industry-specific implementation issues are still unresolved and the final resolution of these issues could impact our current accounting policies and/or patterns for revenue recognition,flows as well as monitor emerging guidance on such topics as easements and rights of way, pipeline laterals, purchase power agreements, and other industry-related areas. We continue the transition method selected.process of identifying and categorizing our lease contracts and evaluating our current business processes and systems.



(2)    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment at December 31 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
 2016 2015  2017 2016 
 Weighted Weighted  Weighted Weighted 
 Average AverageLives (in years) Average AverageLives (in years)
2016Useful Life (in years)2015Useful Life (in years)MinimumMaximum2017Useful Life (in years)2016Useful Life (in years)MinimumMaximum
Electric plant:        
Production$576,833
46$569,182
463063$587,323
46$576,833
464054
Transmission147,398
48117,708
484070186,045
49147,398
484260
Distribution364,304
46353,241
461575375,214
46364,304
462162
Plant acquisition adjustment (a)
4,870
324,870
324,870
324,870
32
General88,114
2388,939
22365153,535
3288,114
23340
Total plant-in-service1,181,519
 1,133,940
 1,306,987
 1,181,519
 
Construction work in progress54,868
 32,186
 4,832
 54,868
 
Total electric plant1,236,387
 1,166,126
 1,311,819
 1,236,387
 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(338,828) (326,074) (358,946) (338,828) 
Electric plant net of accumulated depreciation and amortization$897,559
 $840,052
 $952,873
 $897,559
 
__________________
(a)The plant acquisition adjustment is included in rate base and is being recovered with 1413 years remaining.

(3)    JOINTLY OWNED FACILITIES

We useOur financial statements include our share of several jointly-owned utility facilities as described below. Our share
of the proportionate consolidation method to account for our percentage interestfacilities’ expenses are reflected in the assets, liabilities andappropriate categories of operating expenses in the Statements of
Income (Loss). Each owner of the following facilities:facility is responsible for financing its investment in the jointly-owned facilities.

We own a 20% interest in the Wyodak Plant (the “Plant”), a coal-fired electric generating station located in Campbell County, Wyoming. PacifiCorp owns the remaining ownership percentage and is the operator of the Plant. We receive our proportionate share of the Plant’s capacity and are committed to pay our share of its additions, replacements and operating and maintenance expenses.

We own a 35% interest in, and are the operator of, the Converter Station Site and South Rapid City Interconnection (the transmission tie), an AC-DC-AC transmission tie. Basin Electric owns the remaining ownership percentage. The transmission tie provides an interconnection between the Western and Eastern transmission grids, which provides us with access to both the WECC region and the MAPP region. The total transfer capacity of the transmission tie is 400 MW, including 200 MW West to East and 200 MW from East to West. We are committed to pay our proportionate share of the additions, replacements and operating and maintenance expenses.

We own a 52% interest in the Wygen III power plant. MDU and the City of Gillette each owns an undivided ownership interest in Wygen III and are obligated to make payments for costs associated with administrative services and a proportionate share of the costs of operating the plant for the life of the facility. We retain responsibility for plant operations.

We own 55 MW of Cheyenne Prairie, a 95 MW gas-fired power generation facility located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Wyoming Electric owns the remaining 40 MW. This facility was placed into commercial operations on October 1, 2014. We are committed to pay our proportionate share of the additions, replacements and operating and maintenance expenses.

The investments in our jointly owned plants and accumulated depreciation are included in the corresponding captions in the accompanying Balance Sheets. Our share of direct expenses of the Plants is included in the corresponding categories of operating expenses in the accompanying Statements of Income. Each of the respective owners is responsible for providing its own financing.



As of December 31, 20162017, our interests in jointly-owned generating facilities and transmission systems included on our Balance Sheets were as follows (in thousands):
Interest in jointly-owned facilitiesPlant in ServiceConstruction Work in ProgressAccumulated DepreciationPlant in ServiceConstruction Work in ProgressAccumulated Depreciation
Wyodak Plant$113,611
$256
$55,878
$114,405
$727
$58,955
Transmission Tie$19,978
$13
$5,793
$20,037
$242
$6,215
Wygen III$138,261
$1,806
$17,635
$138,688
$406
$19,239
Cheyenne Prairie$91,365
$155
$6,015
$91,631
$89
$8,746

(4)    LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt outstanding at December 31 was as follows (in thousands):
 Interest Rate atBalance Outstanding
Maturity DateInterest Rate20162015Due DateDecember 31, 2017December 31, 2017December 31, 2016
First Mortgage Bonds due 2032August 15, 20327.23%$75,000
$75,000
August 15, 20327.23%$75,000
$75,000
First Mortgage Bonds due 2039November 1, 20396.125%180,000
180,000
November 1, 20396.13%180,000
180,000
First Mortgage Bonds due 2044October 20, 20444.43%85,000
85,000
October 20, 20444.43%85,000
85,000
Unamortized Discount, First Mortgage Bonds due 2039  (94)(99)
Less unamortized debt discount  (90)(94)
Series 94A Debt (a)
June 1, 20240.88%2,855
2,855
June 1, 20241.83%2,855
2,855
Unamortized Debt Expense  (3,005)(3,140)
Less unamortized deferred financing costs  (2,870)(3,005)
Long-term Debt  $339,756
$339,616
  $339,895
$339,756
___________________
(a)Variable interest rate at December 31, 2016.2017.

Net deferred financing costs of approximately $3.02.9 million and $3.13.0 million were recorded on the accompanying Balance Sheets in long-term debt at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016, respectively, and are being amortized over the term of the debt. Amortization of deferred financing costs of approximately $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 20162017, 2016 and 2015 and 2014, respectively, are included in Interest expense on the accompanying Statements of Income.

Substantially all of our property is subject to the lien of the indenture securing our first mortgage bonds. First mortgage bonds may be issued in amounts limited by property, earnings and other provisions of the mortgage indentures. We were in compliance with our debt covenants at December 31, 2016.2017.

Long-term Debt Maturities

Scheduled maturities of our outstanding long-term debt (excluding unamortized discounts)discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs) are as follows (in thousands):
2017$
2018$
$
2019$
$
2020$
$
2021$
$
2022$
Thereafter$342,855
$342,855




(5)    FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The estimated fair values of our financial instruments at December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
2016201520172016
Carrying ValueFair ValueCarrying ValueFair ValueCarrying ValueFair ValueCarrying ValueFair Value
Cash and cash equivalents (a)
$234
$234
$297
$297
$16
$16
$234
$234
Long-term debt (b)
$339,756
$410,466
$339,616
$404,864
Long-term debt (b) (c)
$339,895
$446,978
$339,756
$410,466
_______________
(a)Fair value approximates carrying value due to either short-term length of maturity or variable interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates and therefore is classified in Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
(b)Long-term debt is valued using the market approach based on observable inputs of quoted market prices and yields available for debt instruments either directly or indirectly for similar maturities and debt ratingsliabilities in active markets and therefore is classified in Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The carrying
(c)Carrying amount of our variable rate debt approximates fair value due to the variable interest rates with short reset periods. For additional information on our long-term debt see Note 4.is net of deferred financing costs.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of our financial instruments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Included in cash and cash equivalents is cash and overnight repurchase agreement accounts. As part of our cash management process, excess operating cash is invested in overnight repurchase agreements with our bank. Repurchase agreements are not deposits and are not insured by the U.S. Government, the FDIC or any other government agency and involve investment risk including possible loss of principal. We believe however, that the market risk arising from holding these financial instruments is minimal.cash.

Long-Term Debt

For additional information on our long-term debt, see Note 4.

(6)    INCOME TAXES

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the TCJA. The TCJA reduced the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. The Company uses the asset and liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized at currently enacted income tax rates, to reflect the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial and tax basis of assets and liabilities as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. As such, the Company has remeasured the deferred income taxes at the 21% federal tax rate as of December 31, 2017. We have made our best estimate regarding the probability of settlements of net regulatory liabilities established pursuant to the TCJA. The amount of the settlements may change based on decisions and actions by the rate regulators, which could have a material impact on the Company’s future results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In addition, as allowed under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), the Company has recorded provisional income tax amounts as of December 31, 2017 for changes pursuant to the TCJA related to depreciation for which the impacts could not be finalized upon issuance of the Company’s  financial statements, but reasonable estimates could be determined.  However, the provisional amounts may change as the Company finalizes the analysis and computations and such changes could be material to the Company’s future results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in thousands):

201620152014201720162015
Current$1,838
$14,910
$(6)$13,124
$1,838
$14,910
Deferred20,690
7,690
16,518
1,004
20,690
7,690
Total income tax expense$22,528
$22,600
$16,512
$14,128
$22,528
$22,600



The temporary differences, which gave rise to the net deferred tax liability, for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
2016201520172016
Deferred tax assets:  
Employee benefits$5,163
$4,683
$3,012
$5,163
Regulatory liabilities9,099
9,908
24,984
9,099
Other1,815
16,186
1,678
1,815
Total deferred tax assets16,077
30,777
29,674
16,077
  
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Accelerated depreciation and other plant related differences (a)
(202,047)(196,237)(122,002)(202,047)
Regulatory assets(4,391)(4,236)(7,008)(4,391)
Employee benefits(3,075)(3,003)(2,595)(3,075)
Deferred costs(16,920)(14,765)(8,447)(16,920)
Other(1,087)(1,497)(240)(1,087)
Total deferred tax liabilities(227,520)(219,738)(140,292)(227,520)
  
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$(211,443)$(188,961)
Net deferred tax liability$(110,618)$(211,443)
_________________________
(a)To conformThe net deferred tax liabilities were revalued for the change in federal tax rate to 21% under the 2016 presentation of accelerated depreciation and other plant-related differences, 2015 isTCJA. The revaluation resulted in a reduction to net of deferred tax liabilities of $8.6approximately $103 million. Due to the regulatory construct, approximately $97 million previously presented as AFUDC Equity.of the revaluation was reclassified to a regulatory liability.

The effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate for the years ended December 31, as follows:
201620152014201720162015
Federal statutory rate35.0 %35.0 %35.0 %35.0%
Amortization of excess deferred and investment tax credits(0.4)(0.1)(0.3)(0.1)(0.4)(0.1)
AFUDC Equity(0.9)(0.6)(0.1)(1.0)(0.9)(0.6)
Flow through adjustments (a)
(0.9)(0.9)(1.9)(1.8)(0.9)
Tax credits(0.1)
(0.2)(0.1)
Tax reform (b)
(9.2)
Other0.6

0.5
(1.3)0.6
33.3 %33.4 %33.0 %21.6%33.3%33.4%
_________________________
(a)The flow-throughFlow-through adjustments related primarily to an accounting method change for tax purposes that allows us to take a current tax deduction for repair costs that continue to be capitalized for book purposes.costs. We recorded a deferred income tax liability in recognition of the temporary difference created between book and tax treatment and we flowed the tax benefit through to tax expense.
(b)On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was signed into law reducing the federal corporate rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. The 2017 effective tax rate reduction reflects the revaluation of deferred income taxes associated with non-regulated operations required by the change.



The following table reconciles the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, without interest, included in Other deferred credits and other liabilities on the accompanying Balance Sheet (in thousands):
2016201520172016
Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1$2,264
$1,623
$493
$2,264
Additions for current year tax positions13

Additions for prior year tax positions1,194
888

1,194
Reductions for prior year tax positions(682)(247)(204)(682)
Settlements for prior year tax positions(2,283)

(2,283)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31$493
$2,264
$302
$493

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate is approximately $0.2 million. The reductions for prior year tax positions relate primarilynot material to the IRS settlement as discussed below.financial results of the Company.

We file income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdictions as a member of the BHC consolidated group.

It is ourthe Company’s continuing practice to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the interest expense recognized was not material to ourthe financial results.

In January 2016, we reached a settlement in principle with IRS Appeals with respect to research and development tax credits and deductions for tax years 2007 through 2009. The settlement resulted in a reductionresults of approximately $2.9 million excluding interest. Accumulated deferred income taxes were restored by approximately $0.6 million and approximately $2.3 million was reclassified to current taxes payable.the Company.

We do not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to the settlement of any audits or the expiration of statutes of limitations on or before December 31, 2017.2018.

We file income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdictions as a member of the BHC consolidated group.

At December 31, 2016, we arewere no longer in a federal NOL carry forwardcarryforward position.

(7)    COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

We record deferred gains (losses) in AOCI related to interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and the amortization of components of our defined benefit plans. Deferred gains (losses) related to our interest rate swaps are recognized in earnings as they are amortized.


The components of the reclassification adjustments for the period, net of tax, included in Other Comprehensive Income were as follows (in thousands):
Location on the Statements of IncomeAmounts Reclassified from AOCILocation on the Statements of Income (Loss)Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
 20162015 20172016
Gains and Losses on cash flow hedges:  
Interest rate swaps gain (loss)Interest expense$64
$64
Gains and (losses) on cash flow hedges:  
Interest rate swapsInterest expense$64
$64
Income taxIncome tax benefit (expense)(22)319
Income tax benefit (expense)(22)(22)
Total reclassification adjustments related to cash flow hedges, net of tax $42
$383
 $42
$42
    
Amortization of defined benefit plans:    
Actuarial gain (loss)Operations and maintenance$82
$94
Operations and maintenance$86
$82
Income taxIncome tax benefit (expense)(29)(33)Income tax benefit (expense)(30)(29)
Total reclassification adjustments related to defined benefit plans, net of tax $53
$61
 $56
$53

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges relate to a treasury lock entered into in August 2002 to hedge $50 million of our First Mortgage Bonds due on August 15, 2032. The treasury lock cash settled on August 8, 2002, the bond pricing date, and resulted in a $1.8 million loss. The treasury lock is treated as a cash flow hedge and the resulting loss is carried in Accumulated other comprehensive loss and is being amortized over the life of the related bonds.



Balances by classification included within Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the accompanying Balance Sheets were as follows (in thousands):
Interest Rate SwapsEmployee Benefit PlansTotal
 
As of December 31, 2016$(593)$(669)$(1,262)
Other comprehensive income (loss)42
(38)4
As of December 31, 2017$(551)$(707)$(1,258)
 
 
Interest Rate SwapsEmployee Benefit PlansTotalInterest Rate SwapsEmployee Benefit PlansTotal
  
As of December 31, 2015$(635)$(672)$(1,307)$(635)$(672)$(1,307)
Other comprehensive income (loss)42
3
45
42
3
45
As of December 31, 2016$(593)$(669)$(1,262)$(593)$(669)$(1,262)
 
 
Interest Rate SwapsEmployee Benefit PlansTotal
 
As of December 31, 2014$(1,018)$(801)$(1,819)
Other comprehensive income (loss)383
129
512
As of December 31, 2015$(635)$(672)$(1,307)

(8)    EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Funded Status of BenefitDefined Contribution Plans

We apply accounting standardsBHC sponsors a 401(k) retirement savings plan (the 401(k) Plan). Participants in the 401(k) Plan may elect to invest a portion of their eligible compensation to the 401(k) Plan up to the maximum amounts established by the IRS. The 401(k) Plan provides employees the opportunity to invest up to 50% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax or after-tax basis.

The 401(k) Plan provides either a Company Matching Contribution or a Non-Elective Safe Harbor Contribution for regulated operations,all eligible participants. Certain eligible participants receive a Company Retirement Contribution based on the participant’s age and accordingly,years of service or a Company Discretionary Contribution, depending upon the unrecognized net periodic benefit cost that would have been reclassifiedpension plan in which the employee participates. Vesting of all Company contributions ranges from immediate vesting to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was alternatively recorded as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability, netgraduated vesting at 20% per year with 100% vesting when the participant has 5 years of tax.service with the Company.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan (Pension Plan)

We have a defined benefit pension plan (“Pension Plan”) covering certain eligible employees. The benefits for the Pension
Plan are based on years of service and calculations of average earnings during a specific time period prior to retirement. The
Pension Plan has been closed to new employees and certain employees who did not meet age and service based criteria.

Black Hills RetirementThe Pension Plan assets are held in a Master Trust. Due to the plan merger on December 31, 2016, reporting beginning in 2017 will no longer representrepresents an undivided interest in the Master Trust. Our Board of Directors has approved the Plans’Pension Plan’s investment policy. The objective of the investment policy is to manage assets in such a way that will allow the eventual settlement of our obligations to the Pension Plans’Plan’s beneficiaries. To meet this objective, our pension assets are managed by an outside adviser using a portfolio strategy that will provide liquidity to meet the Plans’Pension Plan’s benefit payment obligations. The Pension Plans’Plan’s assets consist primarily of equity, fixed income and hedged investments.

The expected rate of return on pension plan assets is based on a targeted asset allocation range determined by the funded ratio of the plan. As of December 31, 2016,2017, the expected rate of return on pension plan assets is based on the targeted asset allocation range of 44%37% to 52%45% equity securities and other return-seeking assets, and 48%55% to 56%63% fixed-income liability-hedging assets and the expected rate of return from the associatedthese asset categories.

The expected long-term rate of return for investments was 6.25% and 6.75% for the 2016Pension Plan 2017 and 20152016 plan years.years, respectively. Our Pension Plan funding policy is funded in accordancecompliance with the federal government’s funding requirements.

Pension

Plan Assets

The percentages of total plan asset fair value by investment category of our Pension Plan assets at December 31 were as follows:
2016201520172016
Equity securities28%26%26%28%
Real estate5
5
4
5
Fixed income funds57
59
63
57
Cash and cash equivalents2
1
1
2
Hedge funds8
9
6
8
Total100%100%100%100%

Supplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement Plans

We have various supplemental retirement plans (“Supplemental Plans”) for key executives.executives of the Company. The Supplemental Plansplans are non-qualified defined benefit plans.and defined contribution plans (Supplemental Plans). The Supplemental Plans are subject to various vesting schedules.schedules and are not funded by the Company.

Supplemental Plan Assets

We do not fund our Supplemental PlansPlans. We fund on a cash basis as benefits are paid.

Non-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare PlanPlans

Employees who are participants in our Postretirement Healthcare Plan (“Healthcare Plan”) and who retire on or after attaining minimum age and years of service requirements are entitled to postretirement healthcare benefits. These benefits are subject to premiums, deductibles, co-payment provisions and other limitations. Pre-65 retirees receive their retiree medical benefits through the Black Hills self-insured retiree medical plans. Healthcare coverage for Medicare-eligible BHP retirees is provided through an individual market healthcare exchange. We may amend or change the Healthcare Plan periodically. We are not pre-funding our retiree medical plan. We have determined that the Healthcare Plan’s post-65 retiree prescription drug plans are actuarially equivalent and qualify for the Medicare Part D subsidy.



Plan Assets

We fund our Healthcare Plans on a cash basis as benefits are paid.

Plan Contributions and Estimated Cash Flows

CashContributions to the Pension Plan are cash contributions for pension plans are made directly to the Master Trust accounts.Trust. Healthcare and Supplemental Plan contributions are made in the form of benefit payments. Contributions for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
2016201520172016
Defined Benefit Plans  
Defined Benefit Pension Plan$820
$
$4,000
$820
Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan$279
$267
Non-Pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plans$348
$420
Supplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Plan$221
$211
$246
$221
  
Defined Contribution Plans  
Company Retirement Contribution$851
$811
$861
$851
Matching Contributions$1,400
$1,423
$1,306
$1,400

While we do not have required contributions, we expect to make approximately $1.3$1.8 million in contributions to our Defined Benefit Pension Plan in 2017.2018.



Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. OurThe Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the assets that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31 (in thousands):
Defined Benefit Pension Plan2016
Pension PlanDecember 31, 2017
Level 1Level 2Level 3
NAV (a)
Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total Investments Measured at Fair Value
NAV (a)
Total Investments
AXA Equitable General Fixed Income$
$184
$
$184
$
$184
Common Collective Trust - Cash and Cash Equivalents$
$980
$

$980

314

314

314
Common Collective Trust - Equity
14,927


14,927

15,749

15,749

15,749
Common Collective Trust - Fixed Income
31,003


31,003

37,732

37,732

37,732
Common Collective Trust - Real Estate
347

2,300
2,647

249

249
2,258
2,507
Hedge Funds


4,331
4,331




3,398
3,398
Total investments measured at fair value$
$47,257
$
6,631
$53,888
$
$54,228
$
$54,228
$5,656
$59,884

Defined Benefit Pension Plan2015
Pension PlanDecember 31, 2016
Level 1Level 2Level 3
NAV (a)
Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total Investments Measured at Fair Value
NAV (a)
Total Investments
AXA Equitable General Fixed Income$
$196
$
$196
$
$196
Common Collective Trust - Cash and Cash Equivalents$
$498
$

$498

784

784

784
Common Collective Trust - Equity
14,198


$14,198

14,927

14,927

14,927
Common Collective Trust - Fixed Income
32,615


$32,615

31,003

31,003

31,003
Common Collective Trust - Real Estate
418

2,113
$2,531

347

347
2,300
2,647
Hedge Funds


4,881
4,881




4,331
4,331
Total investments measured at fair value$
$47,729
$
6,994
$54,723
$
$47,257
$
$47,257
$6,631
$53,888
________________________
(a)Certain investments that are measured at fair value using Net Asset Value “NAV” per share (or its equivalent) for practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in these tables for these investments are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the reconciliation of changes in the plans’plan’s benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets below.above.

Common Collective Trust - Cash and Cash Equivalents: This category is comprised of theAXA Equitable General Fixed Income Fundand Common Collective Trusts - cash and cash equivalents. The AXA Equitable General Fixed Income Fund: This fund is a fund of diversified portfolios,portfolio, primarily composed of fixed income instruments. Assets are invested in long-term holdings, such as commercial, agricultural and residential mortgages, publicly traded and privately placed bonds and real estate as well as short-term bonds. Fair values of mortgage loans are measured by discounting future contractual cash flows to be received on the mortgage loans using interest rates whichof loans with similar characteristics have.characteristics. The discount rate is derived from taking the appropriate U.S. Treasury rate with a like term. The fair valuesvalue of public fixed maturity securities are generally based on prices obtained from independent valuation service providers with reasonableness prices compared with directly observable market trades. The fair valuesvalue of privately placed securities are determined using a discounted cash flow model. These models use observable inputs with a discount rate based upon the average of spread surveys collected from private market intermediaries and industry sector of the issuer. The Plan’s investments in the AXA Equitable General Fixed Income Fund are categorized as Level 2.

Common Collective Trust - Trust Funds: The Plan holds units of various Common Collective Trust Funds offered through a private placement. The unitsThese funds are valued daily usingbased upon the NAV. The NAVs areredemption price of units held by the Plan, which is based on the current fair value of eachthe common collective trust funds’ underlying assets. Unit values are determined by the financial institution sponsoring such funds by dividing the fund’s underlying investments. Level 1net assets are priced using quotes for trades occurring in active markets forat fair value by its units outstanding at the identical asset. Level 2 assets are priced using observable inputs for the asset (for example, interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).valuation dates. The Plan’s investments in common collective trust funds, with the exception of shares of the common collective trust realtrust-real estate are categorized as Level 2.


Common Collective Trust - RealTrust-Real Estate Fund: This fund is valued based on various factors of the underlying real estate properties, including market rent, market rent growth, occupancy levels, etc. As part of the trustee’s valuation process, properties are externally appraised generally on an annual basis. The appraisals are conducted by reputable independent appraisal firms and signed by appraisers that are members of the Appraisal Institute, with professional designation of Member, Appraisal Institute. All external appraisals are performed in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices. We receive monthly statements from the trustee, along with the annual schedule of investments and rely on these reports for pricing the units of the fund. The funds without participant withdrawal limitations are categorized as Level 2.

The following investments are measured at NAV and are not classified in the fair value hierarchy, in accordance with accounting guidance.
Common Collective Trust-Real Estate Fund: This is the same fund as above except that certain of the funds’ assets contain participant withdrawal policies with restrictions on redemption and are therefore not included in the fair value hierarchy.
Hedge Funds: HedgeThese funds represent investments in other investment funds that seek a return utilizing a number of diverse investment strategies. The strategies, when combined aim to reduce volatility and risk while attempting to deliver positive returns under all market conditions. Amounts are reported on a one-month lag. The fair value of hedge funds is determined using net asset value per share based on the fair value of the hedge fund’s underlying investments. Generally, shares may be redeemed at the end of each quarter, with a 65 day notice and are limited to a percentage of total net asset value of the fund. The net asset values are based on the fair value of each fund’s underlying investments. There are no unfunded commitments related to these hedge funds.

Other Plan ReconciliationsInformation

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the Employee Benefit Plan’semployee benefit plan obligations, and fair value of assets and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, components of the net periodic expense and elements of regulatory assets and liabilities and AOCI (in thousands):

Benefit Obligations
Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement PlansDefined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
As of December 31,Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Plans
Non-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plans

201620152016201520162015201720162017201620172016
Change in benefit obligation:  
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year$65,959
$71,178
$3,426
$3,599
$6,208
$6,038
$64,973
$65,959
$3,404
$3,426
$5,843
$6,208
Service cost606
797


204
233
545
606


206
204
Interest cost2,499
2,956
122
142
187
214
2,341
2,499
116
122
176
187
Actuarial loss (gain)455
(5,650)78
(104)(446)27
4,008
455
144
78
130
(446)
Benefits paid(3,215)(3,284)(222)(211)(420)(387)(3,445)(3,215)(246)(222)(348)(420)
Plan participants transfer to affiliate (a)
(1,331)(38)

(31)(7)(860)(1,331)

(137)(31)
Medicare Part D adjustment




(30)
Plan participants’ contributions



141
120




100
141
Projected benefit obligation at end of year$64,973
$65,959
$3,404
$3,426
$5,843
$6,208
$67,562
$64,973
$3,418
$3,404
$5,970
$5,843

A reconciliation of the fair value of

Employee Benefit Plan assets (as of the December 31 measurement date) is as follows (in thousands):Assets
Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement PlansDefined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare PlanDefined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Plans
Non-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plans

201620152016201520162015201720162017201620172016
Beginning fair value of plan assets$54,723
$59,098
$
$
$
$
$53,888
$54,723
$
$
$
$
Investment income (loss)2,485
(1,057)



6,150
2,485




Benefits paid(3,215)(3,284)(221)(211)(420)(387)(3,445)(3,215)(246)(221)(348)(420)
Participant contributions



279
120




100
141
Employer contributions820

221
211
141
267
4,000
820
246
221
248
279
Plan participants transfer to affiliate(a)
(925)(34)



(709)(925)



Ending fair value of plan assets$53,888
$54,723
$
$
$
$
$59,884
$53,888
$
$
$
$
__________________
(a)Change is related to the merger of the three defined benefit pension plans maintained by Black Hills Corporation into one plan as of December 31, 2016.


The funded status of the plans and amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets at December 31 consist of (in thousands):
Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement PlansNon-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement PlanDefined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Plans
Non-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plans

201620152016201520162015201720162017201620172016
Regulatory asset (liability)$18,974
$19,816
$
$
$(2,087)$(1,946)$18,998
$18,974
$
$
$(1,758)$(2,087)
Current liability$
$
$(247)$(216)$(541)$(619)$
$
$(245)$(247)$(534)$(541)
Non-current liability$(11,085)$(11,236)$(3,157)$(3,210)$(5,302)$(5,587)$(7,676)$(11,085)$(3,173)$(3,157)$(5,436)$(5,302)


Accumulated Benefit Obligation (in thousands)
 Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement PlansNon-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
 201620152016201520162015
Accumulated benefit obligation$61,585
$62,240
$3,404
$3,426
$5,843
$6,208
As of December 31 (in thousands)Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental
Non-qualified Defined Benefit Plans
Non-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plans

 201720162017201620172016
Accumulated benefit obligation (a)
$64,782
$61,585
$3,418
$3,404
$5,970
$5,843

____________________
(a)The Defined Benefit Pension Plan Accumulated Benefit Obligation for 2017 and 2016 represents the obligation for the merged Black Hills Retirement Plan.

Components of Net Periodic Expense

Net periodic expense consisted of the following for the year ended December 31 (in thousands):
Defined Benefit
Pension Plan
Supplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement PlansNon-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
Defined Benefit
Pension Plan
Supplemental
Non-qualified Defined Benefit Plans

Non-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
201620152014201620152014201620152014201720162015201720162015201720162015
Service cost$606
$797
$704
$
$
$
$204
$233
$222
$545
$606
$797
$
$
$
$206
$204
$233
Interest cost2,499
2,956
2,991
122
142
146
187
214
241
2,341
2,499
2,956
116
122
142
176
187
214
Expected return on assets(3,632)(3,935)(3,702)





(3,591)(3,632)(3,935)





Amortization of prior service cost (credits)43
43
43



(337)(336)(335)43
43
43



(336)(337)(336)
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)1,995
2,196
940
82
93
45



1,230
1,995
2,196
87
82
93



Net periodic expense$1,511
$2,057
$976
$204
$235
$191
$54
$111
$128
$568
$1,511
$2,057
$203
$204
$235
$46
$54
$111


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

AmountsAOCI

For defined benefit plans, amounts included in AOCI, after-tax, that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost at December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
 Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement PlansNon-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
 201620152016201520162015
Net loss$
$
$669
$672
$
$
Prior service cost





Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)$
$
$669
$672
$
$


 Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit PlansNon-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
 201720162017201620172016
Net (gain) loss$
$
$707
$669
$
$
Total AOCI$
$
$707
$669
$
$

The amounts in AOCI, regulatoryRegulatory assets or regulatoryRegulatory liabilities, after-tax, expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost during calendar year 20172018 are as follows (in thousands):
Defined Benefits
Pension Plan
Supplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement PlansNon-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
Defined Benefits
Pension Plan
Supplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit PlansNon-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
Net gain (loss)$799
$51
$
$1,341
$67
$
Prior service cost28

(218)28

(218)
Total net periodic benefit cost expected to be recognized during calendar year 2017$827
$51
$(218)
Total net periodic benefit cost expected to be recognized during calendar year 2018$1,369
$67
$(218)


Assumptions
Defined Benefit
Pension Plan
Supplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement PlansNon-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
Defined Benefit
Pension Plan
Supplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit PlansNon-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
201620152014201620152014201620152014201720162015201720162015201720162015
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:  
Discount rate4.27%4.63%4.25%4.12%4.29%3.98%3.84%4.03%3.70%3.71%4.27%4.63%3.62%4.12%4.29%3.60%3.84%4.03%
Rate of increase in compensation levels3.47%3.57%3.86%N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.43%3.47%3.57%N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
  
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for plan year:  
Discount rate (a)
4.63%4.25%5.10%4.29%3.98%4.68%4.03%3.70%4.45%4.27%4.63%4.25%4.12%4.29%3.98%3.84%4.03%3.70%
Expected long-term rate of return on assets (b)
6.75%6.75%6.75%N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6.75%6.75%6.75%N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Rate of increase in compensation levels3.57%3.86%3.86%N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.47%3.57%3.86%N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
_____________________________

(a)The estimated discount rate for the merged Black Hills Corporation’s Retirement Plan is 4.27%3.71% for the calculation of the 20172018 net periodic pension costs.
(b)
The expected rate of return on plan assets is 6.75%6.25% for the calculation of the 20172018 net periodic pension cost.



The healthcare benefit obligation was determined at December 31 as follows:
 20162015
Healthcare trend rate pre-65  
Trend for next year6.10%6.35%
Ultimate trend rate4.50%4.50%
Year Ultimate Trend Reached2024
2024
   
Healthcare trend rate post-65  
Trend for next year5.10%5.20%
Ultimate trend rate4.50%4.50%
Year Ultimate Trend Reached2023
2023


 20172016
Trend Rate - Medical  
Pre-65 for next year7.00%6.10%
Pre-65 Ultimate trend rate4.50%4.50%
Trend Year2027
2024
   
Post-65 for next year5.00%5.10%
Post-65 Ultimate trend rate4.50%4.50%
Trend Year2026
2023

We do not pre-fund our post-retirement benefitsupplemental plan or our healthcare plan. The table below shows the estimatedexpected impacts of an increase or decrease to our healthcare trend rate for our Retiree Health CareHealthcare Plan (in thousands):
Change in Assumed Trend RateService and Interest CostsAccumulated Periodic Postretirement Benefit Obligation
1% increase$5
$125
1% decrease$(5)$(121)
Change in Assumed Trend Rate Accumulated Periodic Postretirement Benefit Obligation Service and Interest Costs
Increase 1% $186
 $7
Decrease 1% $(174) $(7)

Beginning in 2016, the Companywe changed the method used to estimate the service and interest cost components of the net periodic pension, supplemental non-qualified defined benefit and other postretirement benefit costs. The new method uses the spot yield curve approach to estimate the service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used to determine the benefit obligations to relevant projected cash outflows. Previously, those costs were determined using a single weighted-average discount rate. The change does not affect the measurement of the total benefit obligations as the change in service and interest costs offset the actuarial gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive income. The new method provides a more precise measure of interest and service costs by improving the correlation between the projected benefit cash flows and the discrete spot yield curve rates. We accounted for this change as a change in estimate beginning in the first quarter of 2016. See “Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations” within our Critical Accounting Policies in Item 7 on this Form 10-K for additional details.

The following benefit payments, which reflect future service, are expected to be paid (in thousands):

 Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Retirement PlansDefined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
2017$3,946
$247
$541
2018$3,543
$243
$562
2019$3,669
$241
$577
2020$3,766
$237
$585
2021$3,883
$330
$570
2022-2026$20,663
$1,519
$2,456

Defined Contribution Plan

The Parent sponsors a 401(k) retirement savings plan in which our employees may participate. Participants may elect to invest up to 50% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax or after-tax basis, up to a maximum amount established by the Internal Revenue Service. The plan provides for company matching contributions and company retirement contributions. Employer contributions vest at 20% per year and are fully vested when the participant has 5 years of service.
 Defined Benefit Pension PlanSupplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit PlansDefined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plan
2018$3,489
$245
$534
2019$3,628
$242
$621
2020$3,725
$239
$633
2021$3,835
$333
$613
2022$3,964
$329
$592
2023-2027$20,648
$1,417
$2,479

(9)    RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Non-Cash Dividend to Parent

We recorded non-cash dividends to our Parent of approximately $42 million and $53 million in 2017 and $29 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively, and decreased the utility moneyMoney pool note receivable net for approximately $42 million and $53 million in 2017 and $29 million in 2016, and 2015, respectively.

Receivables and Payables

We have accounts receivable and accounts payable balances related to transactions with other BHC subsidiaries. These balances as of December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
2016201520172016
Receivable - affiliates$9,526
$6,734
$5,664
$9,526
Accounts payable - affiliates$31,799
$30,582
$25,653
$31,799



Money Pool Notes Receivable and Notes Payable

On September 1, 2017, the Utility Money Pool was transferred from Black Hills Power to our affiliate Black Hills Utility Holdings. This transfer reduced our cash by $0.7 million, reduced our Money pool notes receivable, net by $1.0 million and increased our Retained earnings by $0.3 million.

We have awill continue to participate in the Utility Money Pool Agreement (the Agreement) with BHC, Wyoming Electric and Black Hills Utility Holdings.. Under the agreement,Agreement, we may borrow from BHCthe pool; however the Agreement restricts usthe pool from loaning funds to BHC or to any of BHCs’BHC’s non-utility subsidiaries. The Agreement does not restrict us from makingpaying dividends to BHC. Borrowings under the agreementAgreement bear interest at the weighted average daily cost of our parent company’s external borrowings as defined under the Agreement, or if there are no external funds outstanding on that date, then the rate will be the daily one monthone-month LIBOR rate plus 1.0%.

The cost of borrowing under the Utility Money Pool was 2.21%1.96% at December 31, 2016.2017.

We had the following balances with the Utility Money Pool as of December 31 (in thousands):
 20162015
Notes receivable (payable), net$28,409
$76,813
 20172016
Notes receivable (payable)$(13,397)$28,409

Interest income relating to the Utility Money Pool for the years ended December 31, was as follows (in thousands):
 201620152014
Interest income$1,047
$1,153
$304
 201720162015
Interest income$272
$1,047
$1,153

Interest expense allocation from Parent

BHC provides daily liquidity and cash management on behalf of all its subsidiaries. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014,2015, we were allocated $1.4 million, $1.9 million, $2.1 million and $0.5$2.1 million, respectively, of interest expense allocations from BHC.

Other Balances and Transactions

We have the following Power Purchase and Transmission Services Agreements with affiliated entities:

An agreement, expiring September 3, 2028, with Wyoming Electric to acquire 15 MW of the facility output from Happy Jack. Under a separate inter-company agreement expiring on September 3, 2028, Wyoming Electric has agreed to sell up to 15 MW of the facility output from Happy Jack to us.

An agreement, expiring September 30, 2029, with Wyoming Electric to acquire 20 MW of the facility output from Silver Sage. Under a separate inter-company agreement expiring on September 30, 2029, Wyoming Electric has agreed to sell 20 MW of energy from Silver Sage to us.

A Generation Dispatch Agreement with Wyoming Electric that requires us to purchase all of Wyoming Electric’s excess energy.

Related-party Gas Transportation Service Agreement

On October 1, 2014, we entered into a gas transportation service agreement with Wyoming Electric in connection with gas supply for Cheyenne Prairie. The agreement is for a term of 40 years, in which we pay a monthly service and facility fee for firm and interruptible gas transportation.



Related-party Revenue and Purchases

We had the following related-party transactions for the years ended December 31 included in the corresponding captions in the accompanying Statements of Income:
 201620152014
 (in thousands)
Revenues:   
Energy sold to Wyoming Electric$2,440
$1,857
$1,894
Rent from electric properties$5,046
$4,772
$4,102
    
Purchases:   
Purchase of coal from WRDC$16,227
$16,401
$16,861
Purchase of excess energy from Wyoming Electric$252
$898
$3,033
Purchase of renewable wind energy from Wyoming Electric - Happy Jack$1,918
$1,578
$1,959
Purchase of renewable wind energy from Wyoming Electric - Silver Sage$3,300
$2,739
$3,200
Corporate support services from Parent, Black Hills Service Company and Black Hills Utility Holdings$25,748
$26,655
$32,332
 201720162015
 (in thousands)
Revenues:   
Energy sold to Cheyenne Light$2,481
$2,440
$1,857
Rent from electric properties$5,100
$5,046
$4,772
    
Fuel and purchased power:   
Purchases of coal from WRDC$15,948
$16,227
$16,401
Purchase of excess energy from Cheyenne Light$601
$252
$898
Purchase of renewable wind energy from Cheyenne Light - Happy Jack$1,924
$1,918
$1,578
Purchase of renewable wind energy from Cheyenne Light - Silver Sage$3,290
$3,300
$2,739
    
Gas transportation service agreement:   
Gas transportation service agreement with Cheyenne Light for firm and interruptible gas transportation$393
$399
$410
    
Corporate support:   
Corporate support services and fees from Parent, Black Hills Service Company and Black Hills Utility Holdings$27,869
$25,748
$26,655


Horizon Point Agreement

We have an arrangement among South Dakota Electric, Black Hills Service Company, and Black Hills Utility Holdings where there is a cost allocation for the use of the Horizon Point facility that is owned by South Dakota Electric.  This cost allocation, includes the recovery of and return on allocable property and recovery of incurred administrative service expenses for the operation and maintenance of the Horizon Point facility.

(10)    SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Years ended December 31,201620152014201720162015
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Non-cash investing and financing activities -  
Property, plant and equipment acquired with accrued liabilities$5,521
$3,870
$4,234
$6,565
$5,521
$3,870
Non-cash decrease to money pool note receivable, net$(52,500)$(28,501)$
Non-cash decrease to money pool note receivable$(42,000)$(52,500)$(28,501)
Non-cash dividend to Parent company$52,500
$28,501
$
$42,000
$52,500
$28,501
  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: 
Cash (paid) refunded during the period for -  
Interest (net of amounts capitalized)$(21,320)$(21,913)$(19,573)$(21,517)$(21,320)$(21,913)
Income taxes$
$
$
Income taxes (paid) refunded$(12,719)$
$



(11)    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Power Purchase and Transmission Services Agreements

We have the following power purchase and transmission services agreements, not including related party agreements, as of December 31, 20162017 (see Note 9 for information on related party agreements):

A PPA with PacifiCorp, expiring on December 31, 2023,, which provides for the purchase by us of 50 MW of electric capacity and energy from PacifiCorp’s system. The price paid for the capacity and energy is based on the operating costs of one of PacifiCorp’s coal-fired electric generating plants;
plants.

A firm point-to-point transmission accessservice agreement to deliver up to with PacifiCorp that expires December 31, 2023. The agreement provides 50 MW of power on PacifiCorp’s transmission systemcapacity and energy to wholesale customers in the western region through December 31, 2023; and
be transmitted annually by PacifiCorp.

An agreement with Thunder Creek for gas transport capacity, expiring on October 31, 2019.
2019.

Costs incurred under these agreements were as follows for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

ContractContract Type201620152014Contract Type201720162015
PacifiCorpElectric capacity and energy$12,221
$13,990
$13,943
Electric capacity and energy$13,218
$12,221
$13,990
PacifiCorpTransmission access$1,428
$1,213
$1,227
Transmission access$1,671
$1,428
$1,213
Thunder CreekGas transport capacity$633
$633
$633
Gas transport capacity$633
$633
$633

Future Contractual Obligations

The following is a schedule of future minimum payments required under power purchase, transmission services, facility and vehicle leases, and gas supply agreements (in thousands):

2017$13,091
2018$6,388
$13,531
2019$6,388
$6,839
2020$6,388
$6,839
2021$5,755
$6,206
2022$6,206
Thereafter$11,510
$6,206

Long-Term Power Sales Agreements

We have the following power sales agreements as of December 31, 20162017:

An agreement with MDU to supply up to a maximum of 25 MW on a cost reimbursement basis duringDuring periods of reduced production at Wygen III;III in which MDU owns a portion of the capacity, or during periods when Wygen III is off-line, MDU will be provided with 25 MW from our other generation facilities or from system purchases with reimbursement of costs by MDU. This agreement expires January 31, 2023.

AAn agreement to serve MDU capacity and energy agreement with MDU through December 31, 2023 to supply up to a maximum of 50 MW;MW in excess of Wygen III ownership. This agreement expires December 31, 2023.

An agreement with the City of Gillette to supply its first 23 MW on a cost reimbursement basis duringDuring periods of reduced production at Wygen III.III in which the City of Gillette owns a portion of the capacity, or during periods when Wygen III is off-line, we will provide the City of Gillette with its first 23 MW from our other generating facilities or from system purchases with reimbursement of costs by the City of Gillette. Under this agreement, wewhich expires September 3, 2019, South Dakota Electric will also provide the City of Gillette their operating component of spinning reserves;

A unit-contingent energy and capacity sales agreement with MEAN expiring on May 31, 2023. This contract is based on up to 10 MW from Neil Simpson II and up to 10 MW from Wygen III based on the availability of these plants. The energy and capacity purchase requirements decrease over the term of the agreement; and
reserves.



A PPA with MEAN expiring May 31, 2023. This contract is unit-contingent on up to 10 MW from Neil Simpson II and up to 10 MW from Wygen III based on the availability of these plants. The capacity purchase requirements decrease over the term of the agreement.

Effective January 1, 2017, we have an energy sales agreement with Cargill through(assigned to Macquarie on January 3, 2018) expiring December 31, 2021 to supply 50 MW of energy during heavy and light load timing intervals.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to costs resulting from a number of federal, state and local laws and regulations which affect future planning and existing operations. They can result in increased capital expenditures, operating and other costs as a result of compliance, remediation and monitoring obligations. Due to the environmental issues discussed below, we may be required to modify, curtail, replace or cease operating certain facilities or operations to comply with statutes, regulations and other requirements of regulatory bodies.

Solid Waste Disposal

Various materials used at our facilities are subject to disposal regulations. Our Osage plant, permanently retired on March 21, 2014, had an on-site ash impoundment that was near capacity. An application to close the impoundment was approved on April 13, 2012. Site closure work was completed in 2013 with the state providing closure certification in 2014. Post closure monitoring activities will continue for 30 years following the closure certification date.

In September 2013, Osage also received a permit to close the small industrial rubble landfill. Site work was completed with the state providing closure certification in 2014. Post closure monitoring will continue for 30 years following the closure certification date.

For additional information on environmental matters, see Item 1 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, we are subject to various lawsuits, actions, proceedings, claims and other matters asserted under laws and regulations. We believe the amounts provided in the consolidated financial statements to satisfy alleged liabilities are adequate in light of the probable and estimable contingencies. However, there can be no assurance that the actual amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities from various legal proceedings, claims and other matters discussed, and to comply with applicable laws and regulations will not exceed the amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

In the normal course of business, we enter into agreements that include indemnification in favor of third parties, such as information technology agreements, purchase and sale agreements and lease contracts. We have also agreed to indemnify our directors, officers and employees in accordance with our articles of incorporation, as amended. Certain agreements do not contain any limits on our liability and therefore, it is not possible to estimate our potential liability under these indemnifications. In certain cases, we have recourse against third parties with respect to these indemnities. Further, we maintain insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims under these indemnities.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to costs resulting from a number of federal, state and local laws and regulations which affect future planning and existing operations. They can result in increased capital expenditures, operating and other costs as a result of compliance, remediation and monitoring obligations. Due to the environmental issues discussed below, we may be required to modify, curtail, replace or cease operating certain facilities or operations to comply with statutes, regulations and other requirements of regulatory bodies.

Air

Our generation facilities are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of air quality. These laws and regulations cover, among other pollutants, carbon monoxide, SO2, NOx, mercury, hazardous air pollutants, particulate matter and GHG. Power generating facilities burning fossil fuels emit each of the foregoing pollutants and, therefore, are subject to substantial regulation and enforcement oversight by various governmental agencies.

Title IV of the Clean Air Act applies to several of our generation facilities, including the Neil Simpson II, Neil Simpson CT, Lange CT, Wygen III and Wyodak plants. Title IV of the Clean Air Act created an SO2 allowance trading program as part of the federal acid rain program. Without purchasing additional allowances, we currently hold sufficient allowances to satisfy Title IV at all such plants through 2046.

The EPA issued the Industrial and Commercial Boiler Regulations for Area Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants, with updates which impose emission limits, fuel requirements and monitoring requirements. The rule had a compliance deadline of March 21, 2014. In anticipation of this rule, we suspended operations at the Osage plant on October 1, 2010 and as a result of this rule, we suspended operations at the Ben French facility on August 31, 2012. We permanently retired Ben French, Osage and Neil Simpson I on March 21, 2014. The net book value of these plants was allowed regulatory accounting treatment and is recorded as a Regulatory Asset on the accompanying Balance Sheets.

Solid Waste Disposal

Various materials used at our facilities are subject to disposal regulations. Our Osage plant, permanently retired on March 21, 2014, had an on-site ash impoundment that was near capacity. An application to close the impoundment was approved on April 13, 2012. Site closure work was completed in 2013 with the state providing closure certification in 2014. Post closure monitoring activities will continue for 30 years.

In September 2013, Osage also received a permit to close the small industrial rubble landfill. Site work was completed with the state providing closure certification in 2014. Post closure monitoring will continue for 30 years following the closure certification date.


(12)    QUARTERLY HISTORICAL DATA (Unaudited)

We operate on a calendar year basis. The following table sets forth selected unaudited historical operating results data for each quarter (in thousands):
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
2016 
Operating revenues$68,642
$62,019
$66,728
$70,243
2017 
Revenues$73,794
$66,053
$73,938
$74,648
Operating income$20,780
$18,936
$22,410
$23,454
$23,376
$17,712
$23,698
$19,040
Net income$11,186
$9,806
$12,010
$12,136
$12,570
$9,287
$13,826
$15,615
  
2015 
Operating revenues$70,283
$68,038
$72,111
$67,432
2016 
Revenues$68,642
$62,019
$66,728
$70,243
Operating income$21,490
$21,143
$23,456
$21,825
$20,780
$18,936
$22,410
$23,454
Net income$10,403
$10,547
$12,287
$11,937
$11,186
$9,806
$12,010
$12,136

The fourth quarter of 2017 Net income includes a net tax benefit of $6.0 million from the impact of the TCJA.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of December 31, 20162017. Based on their evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting is presented on Page 2726 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

During our fourth fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

None.



ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for services provided to us for the fiscal years ended December 31 by our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP (in thousands):
Deloitte & Touche LLP2016201520172016
Audit Fees$216
$360
$407
$216
Tax Fees23
16
31
23
Audit-related fees

Total$239
$376
$438
$239

Audit Fees. Fees for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements, review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that generally only the independent auditor can reasonably provide, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Tax Fees. Fees for services related to tax compliance, tax planning and advice including tax assistance with tax audits. These services include assistance regarding federal tax compliance and advice, review of tax returns, and federal tax planning.

The services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP were pre-approved in accordance with the Black Hills Corporation Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy whereby the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants. The Audit Committee annually reviews the services expected to be provided by the independent auditors and establishes pre-approval fee levels for each category of services to be provided, including audit, audit-related, tax and other services. Any service that is not included in the approved list of services must be separately pre-approved by the Audit Committee.




ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)1.Financial Statements
   
  Financial statements required by Item 15 are listed in the index included in Item 8 of Part II.
   
 2.Schedules

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 20162017, 20152016 and 20142015

  All other schedules have been omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included elsewhere in the financial statements incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.

SCHEDULE II
BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
DescriptionBalance at beginning of yearAdditions charged to costs and expensesDeductions charged to costs and expensesBalance at end of yearBalance at beginning of yearAdditions charged to costs and expensesDeductions charged to costs and expensesBalance at end of year
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts:  
2017$157
$882
$(815)$224
2016$207
$644
$(694)$157
$207
$644
$(694)$157
2015$261
$602
$(656)$207
$261
$602
$(656)$207
2014$220
$699
$(658)$261



3.Exhibits
Exhibit NumberDescription
  
3.1*
  
3.2*Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of South Dakota on December 22, 2000 (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for 2000).
3.3*
  
4.1*
  
10.1*
  
10.2*
  
10.3*
  
31.1
  
31.2
  
32.1
  
32.2
  
101Financials for XBRL Format
_________________________
*Previously filed as part of the filing indicated and incorporated by reference herein.

(a)See (a) 3. Exhibits above.
(b)See (a) 2. Schedules above.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT.

The Registrant is not required to send an Annual Report or Proxy to its sole security holder and parent company, Black Hills Corporation.



ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
  BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.
   
  By/s/ DAVID R. EMERY
  David R. Emery, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
   
Dated:February 28, 201726, 2018 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ DAVID R. EMERYDirector andFebruary 28, 201726, 2018
David R. Emery, Chairman andPrincipal Executive Officer 
Chief Executive Officer  
   
/s/ RICHARD W. KINZLEYDirector andFebruary 28, 201726, 2018
Richard W. Kinzley, Senior Vice PresidentPrincipal Financial and 
and Chief Financial OfficerAccounting Officer 
   
/s/ LINDEN R. EVANSDirectorFebruary 28, 201726, 2018
Linden R. Evans  
   
/s/ BRIAN G. IVERSONDirectorFebruary 28, 201726, 2018
Brian G. Iverson  


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

62
Exhibit NumberDescription
3.1*Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 7, 1994 (No. 1-7978)).
3.2*Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of South Dakota on December 22, 2000 (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for 2000).
3.3*Bylaws of the Registrant (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated July 13, 1999).
4.1*Restated and Amended Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust of Black Hills Corporation (now called Black Hills Power, Inc.) dated as of September 1, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 4.19 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-150669-01)). First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 13, 2002, between Black Hills Power, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank), as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.20 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-150669-01)). Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2009, between Black Hills Power, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (filed as Exhibit 4.21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-150669-01)). Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2014, between Black Hills Power, Inc., and The Bank of New York Mellon (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2014).
10.1*Restated and Amended Coal Supply Agreement for NS II dated February 12, 1993 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-150669-01)).
10.2*Second Restated and Amended Power Sales Agreement dated September 29, 1997, between PacifiCorp and Black Hills Power, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-150669-01)).
10.3*Bond Purchase Agreement dated as of June 30, 2014 by and among Black Hills Power, Inc., New York Life Insurance Company, New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.), John Hancock Life & Health Insurance Company, John Hancock Life Insurance Company of New York and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2014).
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101Financial Statements for XBRL Format
_________________________
*Previously filed as part of the filing indicated and incorporated by reference herein.


64