Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 _____________________________________________ 
FORM 10-K
_____________________________________________
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                to                
Commission File Number 1-71
_____________________________________________  
hsc-20201231_g1.jpg
HEXION INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 _____________________________________________ 
 
New Jersey13-0511250
New Jersey13-0511250
(State of incorporation)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
180 East Broad St., Columbus, OH 43215614-225-4000
(Address of principal executive offices)(Registrant’s telephone number)
 _____________________________________________ 
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
NoneNone
  _____________________________________________ 
(Former name, former address and fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 _____________________________________________ 
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE
_____________________________________________ 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  o     No  x.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  o    No  x.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  xo   No  ox.
Explanatory Note:  While the registrant is not subject to the filing requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, it has filed all reports required to be filed by such filing requirements during the preceding 12 months.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filero
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes      No  x.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filero
Non-accelerated filerx(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth companyo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o    No  x.
At December 31, 2017,2020, the aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity of the Registrant held by non-affiliates was zero.0.
Number of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of the close of business on March 1, 2018: 82,556,8472021: 100
Documents incorporated by reference. None



Table of Contents
HEXION INC.
INDEX
 
Page
PART I
PART II
Consolidated Financial Statements of Hexion Inc.
Financial Statement Schedules:
PART III
PART IV



Hexion Inc. | 2 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
PART I
(dollars in millions)
Forward-LookingForward Looking and Cautionary Statements
Certain statements in this report, including without limitation, certain statements made under Item 1, “Business,” and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” are forward-looking statements within the meaning of and made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, our management may from time to time make oral forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “might,” “plan,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “seek” or “intend” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future events and conditions and are based on currently available financial, economic and competitive data and our current business plans. Actual results could vary materially depending on risks and uncertainties that may affect our operations, markets, services, prices and other factors as discussed in the Risk Factors section of this report.report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, we caution you against relying on any forward-looking statements as it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, a weakening of global economic and financial conditions, interruptions in the supply of or increased cost of raw materials, the loss of, or difficulties with the further realization of, cost savings in connection with our strategic initiatives, the impact of our substantial indebtedness, our failure to comply with financial covenants under our credit facilities or other debt, pricing actions by our competitors that could affect our operating margins, changes in governmental regulations and related compliance and litigation costs, uncertainties related to COVID-19 and the impact
of our responses and the other factors listed in the Risk Factors section of this report.report and in our other SEC filings. For a more detailed discussion of these and other risk factors, see the Risk Factors section inof this report.report and our most recent filings made with the SEC. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. The forward-looking statements made by us speak only as of the date on which they are made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

hsc-20201231_g2.jpg
Hexion Inc. | 3 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ITEM 1 - BUSINESS
Overview(dollars in millions)
General
Based in Columbus, Ohio, Hexion Inc. (“Hexion” or the “Company”), a New Jersey corporation, with predecessors dating from 1899, is one of the world’s largestleading global producer of thermosetting resins, or thermosets,adhesives, coatings and composites materials. Our products include a leading producerbroad range of adhesivecritical components and structural resins and coatings. Thermosets are a critical ingredient in most paints, coatings, glues and other adhesives produced for consumer or industrial uses. The type of thermosetformulations used and how it is formulated, applied and cured, determines its key attributes,to impart valuable performance characteristics such as durability, gloss, heat resistance, adhesion orand strength to our customers and their customers’ final products. As such, our products sold to our customers are highly value-added contributions to their final work product, even though they often represent only a small portion of the final product. Thermosetting resins include materialsoverall end-product cost. We serve highly diversified growing end-markets such as phenolicresidential and non-residential construction, wind energy, industrial, automotive, consumer goods and electronics.
In January 2020, we changed our reporting segments to align around our two growth platforms, Adhesives and Coatings & Composites. Our Adhesives segment produces construction and industrial adhesives and additives for energy and agricultural applications. In our Coatings & Composites segment, we produce resins epoxyused in energy, aerospace and automotive, as well as other high performance coatings applications. Our integrated manufacturing platform allows us to supply our derivatives internally and sell excess material to the market. We sell this excess material as Intermediates & Derivatives in the Adhesives segment and Base Chemicals in the Coatings & Composites segment.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“10-K”, “2020 Form 10-K” or “Report”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, Hexion Inc. is referred to as “Hexion”, the “Company”, “we,” “us” or “our.”
Sale of Phenolic Specialty Resins Business
On September 27, 2020, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement for the sale of Phenolic Specialty Resins ("PSR"), Hexamine and European-based Forest Products Resins businesses (together with PSR, the “Held for Sale Business” or the “Business”) to Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC and Investindustrial (the “Buyers”) for a purchase price of approximately $425. The consideration consists of $335 in cash and certain assumed liabilities with the remainder in future contingent proceeds based on the performance of the Held for Sale Business. The final purchase price is subject to customary post-closing adjustments. The Held for Sale Business was formerly included in the Company’s Adhesives reportable segment.

Assets included in the transaction are the Company’s manufacturing sites in Barry, United Kingdom; Cowie, United Kingdom; Lantaron, Spain; Botlek, Netherlands; Iserlohn, Germany; Frielendorf, Germany; Solbiate, Italy; Kitee, Finland; Louisville, Kentucky; Acme, North Carolina; and the Company's 50% ownership interest in Hexion Schekinoazot Holding B.V. (the “Russia JV”), a joint venture that manufactures forest products resins polyester resins, acrylic resinsin Russia.
Until the closing date, the Company has agreed to operate the Held for Sale Business in the ordinary course. The Company has agreed to provide certain transitional services to the Buyers for a limited period of time following the closing. The sale is subject to customary closing conditions, including European Works Council consultation, and urethane resins.is expected to close in the first quarter of 2021.
OurEmergence from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
On April 1, 2019, the Company, Hexion Holdings LLC, Hexion LLC and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions (the “Bankruptcy Petitions”) for reorganization under Chapter 11 (“Chapter 11”) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Chapter 11 proceedings were jointly administered under the caption In re Hexion TopCo, LLC, No. 19-10684 (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). The Debtors continued to operate their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court.
    On June 25, 2019, the Court entered an order (the “Confirmation Order”) confirming the Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Hexion Holdings LLC and its Debtor Affiliates under Chapter 11 (the “Plan”). On the morning of July 1, 2019, in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the Confirmation Order, the Plan became effective and the Debtors emerged from bankruptcy (the “Emergence”).
    As a result of our reorganization and emergence from Chapter 11 on the morning of July 1, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), our direct parent is Hexion Intermediate Holding 2, Inc. (“Hexion Intermediate”), a holding company and wholly owned subsidiary of Hexion Intermediate Holding 1, Inc., a holding company and wholly owned subsidiary of Hexion Holdings Corporation, the ultimate parent of Hexion (“Hexion Holdings” or “Parent”). Prior to its reorganization, the Company’s parent was Hexion LLC, a holding company and wholly owned subsidiary of Hexion Holdings LLC (“(now known as Hexion Holdings”TopCo, LLC or “TopCo”), the previous ultimate parent entity of Hexion. Hexion, Holdings iswhich was controlled by investment funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Management Holdings, L.P. (together with Apollo Global Management, LLCInc. and its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).
Our business is organized
Hexion Inc. | 4 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Fresh Start Accounting
On the Effective Date, in accordance with ASC 852, the Company applied fresh start accounting to its financial statements as (i) the holders of existing voting shares of the Company prior to its emergence received less than 50% of the voting shares of the Company outstanding following its emergence from bankruptcy and (ii) the reorganization value of the Company’s assets immediately prior to confirmation of the plan of reorganization was less than the post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. Fresh start accounting was applied to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of July 1, 2019, the date it emerged from bankruptcy, which resulted in a new basis of accounting and the Company became a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the Company allocated the reorganization value of the Company to its individual assets based on their estimated fair values. Reorganization value represents the productsfair value of the Company’s assets before considering liabilities. The excess reorganization value over the fair value of identified tangible and intangible assets was reported as goodwill. Refer to Note 6 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
Financial Results Summary
Our financial results for the period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and for fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 are referred to as those of the “Predecessor” period. Our financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and for the period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 are referred to as those of the “Successor” period. Our results of operations as reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements for these periods are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which requires that we offerreport on our results for the period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the markets we serve. At period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2017,2019 separately.
    We do not believe that reviewing the results of these periods in isolation would be useful in identifying any trends in or reaching any conclusions regarding our overall operating performance. Management believes that the key performance metrics such as Net sales, Operating income and Segment EBITDA for the Successor period when combined with the Predecessor period provides more meaningful comparisons to other periods and are useful in identifying current business trends. Accordingly, in addition to presenting our results of operations as reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the tables and discussions below also present the combined results for the year ended December 31, 2019.     
    The combined results (referenced as “Non-GAAP Combined” or “Combined”) for the year ended December 31, 2019, which we had three reportable segments: Epoxy, Phenolicrefer to herein as results for the “Year Ended December 31, 2019” represent the sum of the reported amounts for the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 combined with the Successor period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019. These Combined results are not considered to be prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and Coating Resins; Forest Products Resins;have not been prepared as pro forma results under applicable regulations. The Non-GAAP Combined operating results is presented for supplemental purposes only, may not reflect the actual results we would have achieved absent our emergence from bankruptcy, may not be indicative of future results and Corporateshould not be viewed as a substitute for the financial results of the Predecessor period and Other.Successor period presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Hexion Inc. | 5 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Products and Markets
hsc-20201231_g3.jpghsc-20201231_g4.jpghsc-20201231_g5.jpg
We have a broad range of thermoset resin technologies, with high quality research, applications development and technical service capabilities. We provide a broad array of thermosetscapabilities, and associated technologies, andwe have significant market positions in each of the key markets that we serve.
Our products are well aligned with global mega-trends, which we believe are being driven by stringent safety requirements and regulations, population growth and an increasing need for lighter, stronger, higher performance and engineered materials in many end-markets such as aerospace, automotive, energy and construction. We produce resins that are used in thousandsthe formulation of applicationsadhesives, coatings and composites. Such resins are part of the broader thermoset resin industry. Thermosets are materials that permanently cure, harden or set in a final product application. Thermoset resins are generally considered specialty chemical products because they are principally produced based on customer product specifications and sold into diverse markets,on the basis of performance, technical support, product innovation and customer service. We believe we have the broadest range of thermoset resin technologies in the world. We expect that favorable industry dynamics will continue to drive thermoset growth ahead of global GDP, driven by customers’ preferences that are shifting towards green energy, energy efficient production and lower volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”). We address our customers’ increasing sustainability requirements through our products such as forestthe NextGen Epoxy™waterborne system that delivers a low-VOC emitting system in construction, transportation and agricultural equipment markets, and the EPIKOTE™ resin systems and EPIKURE™ and the MGS™ curing agents that provide strength and fatigue performance for larger and heavier rotor blades in wind turbines.
Additionally, our wood adhesive technology enables the most efficient use of engineered wood products, architecturalwhich is one of the most sustainable building materials in the world. Wood construction materials help sequester carbon by keeping it out of the atmosphere for the lifetime of the structure, or longer if the wood is reused. In addition, processing wood requires less energy and industrial paints, packaging, consumerresults in fewer greenhouse gas emissions than other building materials. We are well positioned with our wood adhesives products compositesas the global markets continue to shift to sustainable products.
We have leading market share positions across our integrated and automotive coatings. Major industry sectors that we serve include industrial/marine, construction, consumer/durable goods, automotive, wind energy, aviation, electronics, architectural, civil engineering, repair/remodeling and oil and gas field support. The diversityglobal manufacturing platform in well-structured markets with over 80% of our sales being products limitsthat have the number one or two global positions. We are the number one wood adhesive supplier in the United States, Canada, Brazil and Australia. In composites, we are one of only three global suppliers in the epoxy resin market and we have leadership positions in each of the key end-markets and regions in which we participate. In addition to market leadership, we are integrated from key intermediates to final products, which gives us significant competitive advantages through a cost-effective position, security of supply and stable integrated margins across our dependence on any one marketvalue chain. Our manufacturing is localized, providing additional stability and barriers to entry due to the proximity of our sites to our customers. For example, the majority of our wood adhesive and merchant formaldehyde products are delivered through our pipelines or end-use. through truck and rail within the region to our customers.
          In 2020, our revenue base included net sales in the following end markets:
hsc-20201231_g6.jpg
Hexion Inc. | 6 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
We have a history of product innovation and success in introducing new products to new markets, as evidenced by more than 850750 granted patents, the majority of which relate to the development of new products and manufacturing processes, and we are constantly looking at ways to introduce new products in our currently established markets.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had 5234 active production sites from continuing operations around the world. Through our worldwide network of strategically located production facilities, we serve more than 3,3002,900 customers in approximately 90 86countries. Our position in certain additives, complementary materials and services further enables us to leverage our core thermoset technologies and provide our customers with a broad range of product solutions. As a result of our focus on innovation and a high level of technical service, we have cultivated long-standing customer relationships. Our global customers include leading companies in their respective industries, such as 3M, Akzo Nobel, BASF, Bayer, Dow,Norbord, Louisiana Pacific, Monsanto,Bayer, Owens Corning, PPG Industries, ValsparSherwin Williams, Sinoma, Aeolon and Weyerhaeuser.

Top selected global customers:
hsc-20201231_g7.jpg
Industry & Competitors
We are a large participant in the specialty chemicals industry. Thermosetting resins are generally considered specialty chemical products because they are sold primarily on the basis of performance, technical support, product innovation and customer service. However, as a result of the impact of the ongoing global economic volatility and overcapacity in certain markets, certain of our competitors have focused more on price to retain business and market share, which we have followed in certain markets to maintain market share and remain a market leader.
We compete with many companies in most of our product lines, including large global chemical companies and small specialty chemical companies. No single company competes with us across all of our segments and existing product lines. The principal competitive factors in our industry include technical service, breadth of product offerings, product innovation, product quality and price. Some of our competitors are larger, have greater financial resources and may be able to better withstand adverse changes in industry conditions, including pricing, and the economy as a whole. Further, our competitors may have more resources to support continued expansion than we do. Some of our competitors also have a greater range of products and may be more vertically integrated than we are within specific product lines or geographies.
We believe that the principal factors that contribute to success in the specialty chemicals market, and our ability to maintain our position in the markets we serve, are (i) consistent delivery of high-quality products; (ii) favorable process economics; (iii) the ability to provide value to customers through both product attributes and strong technical service and (iv) an international footprint and presence in growing and developing markets.
Our Businesses
The following is a discussion of our reportable segments, their corresponding major product lines and the primary end-use applications of our key products as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins
Adhesives Segment
20172020 Net Sales: $2,052$1,188

Wood Adhesives and Intermediates
We are the leading producer of formaldehyde-based resins for the North American forest products industry, and also are a leader in the following regions: Latin America, Australia and New Zealand. Formaldehyde-based resins, also known as forest products resins, are a key adhesive and binding ingredient used in the production of a wide variety of engineered lumber products, including medium-density fiberboard (“MDF”), particleboard, oriented strand board (“OSB”) and various types of plywood and laminated veneer lumber (“LVL”). These products are used in a wide range of applications in the construction, remodeling and furniture industries. Nearly all of our formaldehyde requirements for the production of forest products resins are provided by internal production, giving us a competitive advantage versus our non-integrated competitors.
In addition, we are a significant producer of formaldehyde, a key raw material used to manufacture thousands of other chemicals and products, including the manufacture of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (“MDI”) and butanediol (“BDO”). Formaldehyde consuming products are used in multiple applications including agricultural, construction, energy and automotive industries. We are also a leading supplier of phenolic resin coated proppants used in oil field applications. Our highly specialized compounds and resins are designed to perform well under extreme conditions, such as intense heat, high-closure stress and corrosive environments, that characterize oil and gas drilling and are also used to enhance oil and gas recovery rates and extend well life.
Both forest products resins and formaldehyde have relatively short shelf lives, and as such, our manufacturing facilities are strategically located in close proximity to our customers.
Hexion Inc. | 7 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
hsc-20201231_g8.jpg
ProductsKey ApplicationsKey End Markets
Forest Products Resins:
Engineered Wood ResinsSoftwood and hardwood plywood, OSB, LVL, particleboard, MDF and decorative laminatesConstruction

Repair & Remodel

Furniture
Specialty Wood AdhesivesLaminated beams, cross-laminated timber, structural and nonstructural fingerjoints, wood composite I-beams, truck-decking, cabinets, doors, windows, furniture, molding and millwork and paper laminations
Wax EmulsionsMoisture resistance for panel boards and other specialty applications
Phenolic Encapsulated Substrates:
Resin Encapsulated ProppantsOil and gas fracturingOil & Gas
Principal Competitors: Arclin, Georgia-Pacific, Huntsman and BASF
ProductsKey ApplicationsKey End Markets
Formaldehyde Applications:
FormaldehydeMDI, BDO, herbicides and fungicides, scavengers for oil and gas production, fabric softeners, urea formaldehyde resins, phenol formaldehyde resins, melamine formaldehyde resins, hexamine and other catalysts
Agriculture
Construction
Consumer Goods
Energy
Automotive
Oil & Gas
Principal Competitors: Foremark Performance Chemicals, Georgia-Pacific and Arclin

Hexion Inc. | 8 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Coatings and Composites Segment
2020 Net Sales: $1,322

Epoxy Specialty Resins
We are a leading producer of epoxy specialty resins, modifiers and curing agents in Europe and the United States with a global reach to our end markets, which include emergingother regions such as China and Latin America. Epoxy resins are the fundamental component of many types of materials and are often used in the automotive, construction, wind energy, aerospace and electronics industries due to their superior adhesion, strength and durability. We internally consume approximately 30% of our liquid epoxy resin (“LER”) production in specialty composite, coating and adhesive applications, which ensures a consistent supply of our required intermediate materials. Our position in basic epoxy resins, along with our technology and service expertise, has enabled us to offer formulated specialty products in certain markets. In composites, our specialty epoxy products are used either as replacements for traditional materials such as metal, wood and ceramics, or in applications where traditional materials do not meet demanding engineering specifications.
We are a leading producer of resins that are used in fiber reinforced composites. Composites are a fast growing class of materials that are used in a wide variety of applications ranging from aircraft components and wind turbine blades to sports equipment, and increasingly in automotive and transportation. We supply epoxy resin systems to composite fabricators in the wind energy, automotive and pipe markets.
Epoxy specialty resins are also used for a variety of high-end coating applications that require the superior adhesion, corrosion resistance and durability of epoxy, such as protective coatings for industrial flooring, pipe, marine and construction applications and automotive coatings. Epoxy-based surface coatings are among the most widely used industrial coatings due to their long service life and broad application functionality combined with overall economic efficiency. We also leverage our resin and additives position to supply custom resins to specialty coatings formulators.

ProductsKey ApplicationsKey End Markets
Protective Coatings and Adhesive Applications:
Civil EngineeringBuilding and bridge construction, concrete enhancement and corrosion protection
Architectural Coatings
Waterbourne Coatings
Wind Energy
Automotive
Aerospace
Adhesives
Automotive: hem flange adhesives and panel reinforcements
Construction: ceramic tiles, chemical dowels and marble
Aerospace: metal and composite laminates
Electronics: chip adhesives and solder masks
Electrical Applications:
Electronic ResinsUnclad sheets, paper impregnation and electrical laminates for printed circuit boards
Architectural Coatings
Automotive
Construction
Electrical CastingsGenerators and bushings, transformers, medium and high-voltage switch gear components, post insulators, capacitors and automotive ignition coils

Principal Competitors: Olin, Nan Ya, Huntsman, Spolchemie, Leuna Harze and Aditya Birla (Thai Epoxy)
ProductsKey ApplicationsKey End Markets
Composites:
Composite Epoxy ResinsPipes and tanks, automotive, sports (ski, snowboard, golf), boats, construction, aerospace, wind energy and industrial applications
Wind Energy
Automotive
Aerospace
Principal Competitors: Olin, Cytec-Solvay Group, BASF, Aditya Birla (Thai Epoxy), Gurit, Huntsman, Swancor, Bohui, Techstorm and SwancorKangda

Hexion Inc. | 9 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
hsc-20201231_g9.jpg
ProductsKey ApplicationsKey End Markets
Coating Applications:
Floor Coatings (LER, Solutions, Performance Products)Chemically resistant, antistatic and heavy duty flooring used in hospitals, the chemical industry, electronics workshops, retail areas and warehouses
Architectural Coatings
Waterborne Coatings
Ambient Cured Coatings (LER, Solid Epoxy Resin (“SER”) Solutions, Performance Products)Marine (manufacturing and maintenance), shipping containers and large steel structures (such as bridges, pipes, plants and offshore equipment)
Waterborne Coatings (EPI-REZTM Epoxy Waterborne Resins)
Substitutes of solvent-borne products in both heat cured and ambient cured applications
Principal Competitors: Olin, Huntsman, Nan Ya, Air Products, Cytec-Solvay GroupEvonik and Allnex
Basic Epoxy Resins and Intermediates
We are one of the world’s largest suppliers of basic epoxy resins, such as solid epoxy resin (“SER”)SER and LER. These base epoxies are used in a wide variety of industrial coatings applications. In addition, we are a major producer of bisphenol-A (“BPA”) and epichlorohydrin (“ECH”), key precursors in the downstream manufacture of basic epoxy resins and epoxy specialty resins. We internally consume the majority of our BPA, and all of our ECH, which ensures a consistent supply of our required intermediate materials.
ProductsKey ApplicationsKey End Markets
Electrocoat (LER, SER, BPA)Automotive, general industry and white goods (such as appliances)
Architectural Coatings
Automotive
Construction
Powder Coatings (SER, Performance Products)White goods, pipes for oil and gas transportation, general industry (such as heating radiators) and automotive (interior parts and small components)
Heat Cured Coatings (LER, SER)Metal packaging and coil-coated steel for construction and general industry
Principal Competitors: Olin, Huntsman,Kukdo, Nan Ya and the Formosa Plastics Group Leuna Harze, Kukdo and other Korean producersCCP
Versatic Acids and Derivatives
We are the world’s largest producer of Versatic acids and derivatives. Versatic acids and derivatives are specialty monomers that provide significant performance advantages for finished coatings, including superior adhesion, hydrolytic stability, water resistance, appearance and ease of application. Our products include basic Versatic acids and derivatives sold under the Versatic™, VEOVA™ vinyl ester and CARDURA™ glycidyl ester names. Applications for these specialty monomers include decorative, automotive and protective coatings, as well as other uses, such as adhesives and intermediates.
ProductsKey ApplicationsKey End Markets
CARDURA™ glycidyl esterAutomotive repair/refinishing, automotive original equipment manufacturing (“OEM”) and industrial coatingsArchitectural Coatings

Automotive
Versatic™ AcidsChemical intermediates (e.g., for peroxides, pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals) and adhesion promoters (e.g., for tires)
VEOVAvinyl ester
Architectural coatings, construction and adhesives
Principal Competitors: ExxonMobil and Hebei Shield Excellence Technology
Phenolic Specialty Resins and Molding Compounds
We are one of the leading producers of phenolic specialty resins, which are used in applications that require extreme heat resistance and strength, such as after-market automotive and OEM truck brake pads, filtration, aircraft components and foundry resins. These products are sold under globally recognized brand names such as BORDEN, BAKELITE, DURITE and CELLOBOND. Our phenolic specialty resins are known for their binding qualities and are used widely in the production of mineral wool and glass wool used for commercial and domestic insulation applications.

We have expanded our phenolic specialty resins business in select regions where we believe there are prospects for strong long-term growth. In the second half of 2015, we acquired the remaining 50% interest in a joint venture that constructed a phenolic specialty resins manufacturing facility in China. This facility produces a full range of specialty novolac and resole phenolic resins used in a diverse range of applications, including refractories, friction and abrasives to support the growing auto and consumer markets in China, as well as exports.
Products
VEOVAvinyl ester
Key Applications
Phenolic Specialty Resins:Architectural coatings, construction and adhesives
Composites and Electronic ResinsAircraft & rail components, ballistic applications, industrial grating, pipe, jet engine components, computer chip encasement and photolithography
Automotive Phenol Formaldehyde ResinsAcoustical insulation, engine filters, brakes, friction materials, interior components, molded electrical parts and assemblies
Construction Phenol Formaldehyde Resins and Urea Formaldehyde ResinsFiberglass insulation, floral foam, insulating foam, lamp cement for light bulbs, molded appliance and electrical parts, molding compounds, sandpaper, fiberglass mat and coatings
Molding Compounds:
Phenolic, Epoxy, Unsaturated PolyestersHigh performance automotive transmissions and under-hood components, heat resistant knobs and bases, switches and breaker components, pot handles and ashtrays
GlassHigh load, dimensionally stable automotive underhood parts and commutators
Principal Competitors: Sumitomo (Durez), SI Group, Plenco, Dynea International, Arclin, Georgia-PacificCompetitors: ExxonMobil and ShenquanHebei Shield Excellence Technology
Phenolic Encapsulated Substrates

We are a leading producer of phenolic resin encapsulated sand and ceramic substrates that are used in oil field applications. Our highly specialized compounds and resins are designed to perform well under extreme conditions, such as intense heat, high-closure stress and corrosive environments, that characterize oil and gas drilling. Our resin encapsulated proppants are also used to enhance oil and gas recovery rates and extend well life.
Hexion Inc. | 10 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ProductsKey Applications
Oil & Gas Stimulation Services Applications:
Resin Encapsulated ProppantsOilCorporate and gas fracturingOther Segment
Principal Competitors: Santrol, Preferred Sands, Patriot Proppants, Atlas Resins, and Carbo Ceramics
Forest Products Resins Segment
2017 Net Sales: $1,539
Formaldehyde Based Resins and Intermediates
We are the leading producer of formaldehyde-based resins for the North American forest products industry, and also hold significant positions in Latin America, Australia, New Zealand, and Europe. Formaldehyde-based resins, also known as forest products resins, are a key adhesive and binding ingredient used in the production of a wide variety of engineered lumber products, including medium-density fiberboard (“MDF”), particleboard, oriented strand board (“OSB”) and various types of plywood and laminated veneer lumber (“LVL”). These products are used in a wide range of applications in the construction, remodeling and furniture industries. Forest products resins have relatively short shelf lives, and as such, our manufacturing facilities are strategically located in close proximity to our customers.
In addition, we are a significant producer of formaldehyde, a key raw material used to manufacture thousands of other chemicals and products, including the manufacture of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (“MDI”) and butanediol (“BDO”). Nearly all of our formaldehyde requirements for the production of forest products resins are provided by internal production, giving us a competitive advantage versus our non-integrated competitors.
In the second half of 2015, we completed the expansion of our forest products resins manufacturing capacity in Brazil and the construction of a new formaldehyde plant in North America. In addition, we finalized construction of an additional formaldehyde plant in North America in early 2016. This added capacity has enhanced our ability to leverage the expected long-term growth in these regions.

ProductsKey Applications
Forest Products Resins:
Engineered Wood ResinsSoftwood and hardwood plywood, OSB, LVL, particleboard, MDF and decorative laminates
Specialty Wood AdhesivesLaminated beams, cross-laminated timber, structural and nonstructural fingerjoints, wood composite I-beams, truck-decking, cabinets, doors, windows, furniture, molding and millwork and paper laminations
Wax EmulsionsMoisture resistance for panel boards and other specialty applications
Formaldehyde Applications:
FormaldehydeMDI, BDO, herbicides and fungicides, scavengers for oil and gas production, fabric softeners, urea formaldehyde resins, phenol formaldehyde resins, melamine formaldehyde resins, hexamine and other catalysts
Principal Competitors: Arclin, Georgia-Pacific, Huntsman, BASF, Covestro and Foremark Performance Chemicals
Corporate and Other Segment
Our Corporate and Other segment primarily includes corporate general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the other segments, such as shared service and administrative functions, foreign exchange gains and losses and legacy company costs.
For additional information about our segments, see Note 1620 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Industry & Competitors
We are a large participant in the specialty chemicals industry. Thermosetting resins are generally considered specialty chemical products because they are sold primarily on the basis of performance, technical support, product innovation and customer service. However, as a result of the impact of the ongoing global economic uncertainty and overcapacity in certain markets, certain of our competitors have focused more on price to retain business and market share, which we have selectively followed in certain markets to maintain market share and remain a market leader.
We compete with many companies in most of our product lines, including large global chemical companies and small specialty chemical companies. No single company competes with us across all of our segments and existing product lines. The principal competitive factors in our industry include technical service, breadth of product offerings, product innovation, product quality and price. Some of our competitors are larger, have greater financial resources and may be able to better withstand adverse changes in industry conditions and the economy as a whole. Further, our competitors may have more resources to support continued expansion than we do. Some of our competitors also have a greater range of products and may be more vertically integrated than we are within specific product lines or geographies.
We believe that the principal factors that contribute to success in the specialty chemicals market, and our ability to maintain our position in the markets we serve, are (i) consistent delivery of high-quality products; (ii) favorable process economics; (iii) the ability to provide value to customers through both product attributes and strong technical service and (iv) an international footprint and presence in growing and developing markets.
Marketing, Customers and Seasonality
Our products are sold to industrial users worldwide through a combination of a direct sales force that services our larger customers and third-party distributors that more cost-effectively serve our smaller customers. Our customer service and support network is made up of key regional customer service centers. We have global account teams that serve the major needs of our global customers for technical service and supply and commercial term requirements. Where operating and regulatory factors vary from country to country, these functions are managed locally.
In 2017,2020, our largest customer accounted for approximately 2% 3%of our net sales, and our top ten customers accounted for approximately 14%20% of our net sales. Neither our overall business nor any of our reporting segments depends on any single customer or a particular group of customers; therefore, the loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on either of our two reporting segments or the Company as a whole. Our primary customers are manufacturers, and the demand for our products is seasonal in certain of our businesses, with the highest demand in the summer months and lowest in the winter months. Therefore, the dollar amount of our backlog orders as of December 31, 20172020 is not significant. Demand for our products can also be cyclical, as general economic health and industrial and commercial production levels are key drivers for our business.
International Operations
Our non-U.S. operations accounted for 58%54%, 60%53% and 60%53% of our sales in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. While our international operations may be subject to a number of additional risks, such as exposure to foreign currency exchange risk, we do not believe that our foreign operations, on the whole, carry significantly greater risk than our operations in the United States. Information about sales by geographic region for the past three years and long-lived assets by geographic region for the past two years can be found in Note 1620 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. More information about our methods and actions to manage exchange risk and interest rate risk can be found in Item 7A of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Hexion Inc. | 11 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents

In 2020, our revenue base included sales to the following regions:
hsc-20201231_g10.jpg

Key manufacturing locations:

hsc-20201231_g11.jpg

Hexion Inc. | 12 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Raw Materials
In 2017,2020, we purchased approximately $2.2$1.5 billion of raw materials, representing approximately 70%75% of our cost of sales.sales (excluding depreciation expense). The three largest raw materials that we use are phenol, methanol and urea, which collectively represented approximately 50% of our total raw material expenditures in 2017.2020. The majority of raw materials that we use to manufacture our products are available from more than one source, and are readily available in the open market. We have long-term purchase agreements for certain raw materials that ensure the availability of adequate supply. These agreements generally have periodic price adjustment mechanisms and do not have minimum annual purchase requirements. Smaller quantity materials that are single sourced generally have long-term supply contracts to maximize supply reliability. Prices for our main feedstocks are generally driven by underlying petrochemical benchmark prices and energy costs, which are subject to price fluctuations. Although we seek to offset increases in raw material prices with increases in our product prices, we may not always be able to do so, and there are periods when price increases lag behind raw material price increases.

hsc-20201231_g12.jpg

Research and Development
Our research and development activities are geared towards developing and enhancing products, processes and application technologies so that we can maintain our position as one of the world’s largest producerproducers of thermosetting resins. We focus on:
 
developing new or improved applications based on our existing product lines and identified market trends;
 
developing new resin products and applications for customers to improve their competitive advantage and profitability;
 
providing premier technical service for customers of specialty products;
 
providing technical support for manufacturing locations and assisting in optimizing our manufacturing processes;
 
ensuring that our products are manufactured consistent with our global environmental, health and safety policies and objectives;
 
developing lower cost manufacturing processes globally; and
 
expanding our production capacity.
We have over 380300 scientists and technicians worldwide. Our research and development facilities include a broad range of synthesis, testing and formulating equipment and small-scale versions of customer manufacturing processes for applications development and demonstration. We recently completed our new Application Development Center (“ADC”) in Shanghai, China, as part of our global efforts to further strengthen our industry-leading research and development and technical services capabilities. We continue to strategically invest in our R&D footprint to increase opportunities for innovation and stimulate growth.
Hexion Inc. | 13 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
More recently, we have focused research and development resources on the incorporation of green chemistry principles into technology innovations to remain competitive and to address our customers’ demands for more environmentally preferred solutions. Our efforts have focused on developing resin technologies that reduce emissions, maximize efficiency and increase the use of bio-based raw materials. Some examples of meaningful results of our investment in the development of green products with sustainable attributes include:
 
EPIKOTE™ / EPIKURE™ epoxy systems for wind energy applications, which provide superior mechanical and process properties, reducing air emissions when hours of energy are created;


EPIKOTE™ and Bakelite® resin systems for automotive applications, which produce lightweight automotive composite components and other automotive parts that allow customers to build cars with better mileage, reducing air emissions without sacrificing performance;


EcoBind™ Resin Technology, an ultra low-emitting binder resin used to produce engineered wood products; andproducts,
 
Epi-Rez™ Epoxy Waterborne Resins, which provide for lower volatile organic compounds, reducing air emissions.emissions,

VeoVa™ Silane Technology, an alkoxy silane vinylester technology which can be used to cure coatings isocyanate-free resin; and
Armorbuilt™, a new fire resistant wrap product when applied to a substrate that launched in 2020. This product is designed to protect the critical utility pole infrastructure against wildfires.
In 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, our research and development and technical services expense was $58, $59 $38, $41and $65, respectively ($3 and $6 of these expenses in 2016 and 2015, respectively, relate to divested businesses).$43, respectively. We take a customer-driven approach to discovering new applications and processes and providing customer service through our technical staff. Through regular direct contact with our key customers, our research and development associates can become aware of evolving customer needs in advance, and can anticipate their requirements to more effectively plan customer programs. We also focus on continuous improvement of plant yields and production capacity and reduction of fixed costs.
Intellectual Property
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we own, license or have rights to over 850 granted750 patents and over 1,1501,000 registered trademarks, as well as various patent and trademark applications and technology licenses around the world, which we currently use or hold for use in our operations. A majority of our patents relate to developing new products and processes for manufacturing and will expire between 20182021 and 2035.2038. We renew our trademarks on a regular basis. While we view our patents and trademarks to be valuable, because of the broad scope of our products and services, we do not believe that the loss or expiration of any single patent or trademark would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or the continuation of our business.
Industry Regulatory Matters
Domestic and international laws regulate the production and marketing of chemical substances. Almost every country has its own legal procedures for registration and import. Of these, the laws and regulations in the European Union, the United States (Toxic Substances Control Act) and China are the most significant to our business. Additionally, other laws and regulations may also limit our expansion into other countries.countries, such as K-REACH in South-Korea or KKDIK in Turkey. Chemicals that are not included on one or more of these, or any other country’s chemical inventory lists, can usually be registered and imported, but may first require additional testing or submission of additional administrative information.
The European Commission enacted a regulatory system in 2006, known as Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemical substances (“REACH”), which requires manufacturers, importers and consumers of certain chemicals to register these chemicals and evaluate their potential impact on human health and the environment. As REACH matures and is further amended, significant market restrictions could be imposed on the current and future uses of chemical products that we use as raw materials or that we sell as finished products in the European Union. Other countries may also enact similar regulations.

Environmental Regulations
Our policy is to operate our plants in a manner that protects the environment, health and safety of our employees, customers and communities. We have implemented company-wide environmental, health and safety policies managed by our Environmental, Health and Safety (“EH&S”) department and overseen by the EH&S Committee of Hexion Holdings’ Board of Managers.Directors. Our EH&S department provides support and oversight to our operations worldwide to ensure compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. This responsibility is executed via training, communication of EH&S policies, formulation of relevant policies and standards, EH&S audits and incident response planning and implementation. Our EH&S policies include systems and procedures that govern environmental emissions, waste generation, process safety management, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous substances, worker health and safety requirements, site security, emergency planning and response and product stewardship.

Hexion Inc. | 14 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Our operations involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials, and we are subject to extensive environmental regulation at the federal, state and international levels. We are also exposed to the risk of claims for environmental remediation or restoration. Our production facilities require operating permits that are subject to renewal or modification. Violations of environmental laws or permits or safety obligations may result in restrictions being imposed on operating activities, substantial fines, penalties, damages or other costs. In addition, statutes such as the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and comparable state and foreign laws impose strict, joint and several liability for investigating and remediating the consequences of spills and other releases of hazardous materials, substances and wastes at current and former facilities, as well as third-party disposal sites. Other laws permit individuals to seek recovery of damages for alleged personal injury or property damage due to exposure to hazardous substances and conditions at our facilities or to hazardous substances otherwise owned, sold or controlled by us. Therefore, notwithstanding our commitment to environmental management and environmental health and safety, we may incur liabilities in the future, and these liabilities may result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Although our environmental policies and practices are designed to ensure compliance with international, federal and state laws and environmental regulations, future developments and increasingly stringent regulation could require us to make additional unforeseen environmental expenditures. In addition, our former operations, including our ink, wallcoverings, film, phosphate mining and processing, thermoplastics and food and dairy operations may give rise to claims relating to our period of ownership.

We expect to incur future costs for capital improvements and general compliance under environmental, health and safety laws, including costs to acquire, maintain and repair pollution control equipment. In 2017, we2020, our continuing operations incurred related capital expenditures of $25.$13. We estimate that capital expenditures in 20182021 for environmental controls at our facilities will be between $20$15 and $25.$20. This estimate is based on current regulations and other requirements, but it is possible that a material amount of capital expenditures, in addition to those we currently anticipate, could be necessary if these regulations or other requirements or other facts change.change, or are needed to ensure the safe operation of our equipment.
Employees
Sustainability Goals for 2021 and Beyond

Hexion completed an assessment in 2020 as part of our ongoing sustainability strategic planning initiatives. By focusing efforts on these sustainability strategic goals which are mentioned below, Hexion can make a positive change. From demand for energy efficiency to creating bio-based and circular products, chemistry can play an important role in addressing climate change as we positively address our carbon footprint. These new goals strengthen our long-standing commitment to sustainability and delivering on our strategic approach to ‘Responsible Chemistry,’ which includes supporting our associates, customers and communities. While not limiting our sustainability efforts to these focus areas alone, these topics included:
Minimizing climate change impact - Hexion will strive to protect against climate change throughout its business lifecycle by efficiently using natural resources, optimizing existing processes and enhancing products and technologies through continuous innovation.
Developing innovative sustainable products - Hexion is committed that by 2030, all new products will incorporate sustainable attributes, such as lightweighting, low emissions, and durability.
Reducing spills and releases - Hexion has committed to reduce spill mass and releases by 80 percent by 2025.
Maintaining product stewardship - Hexion remains committed to Responsible Care Product Safety Code and will continue to be transparent and communicate to key stakeholders regarding its stewardship programs such as risk reviews and reduction of substances of concern.
Work continues to establish an aspirational goal around climate change and Greenhouse Gas emission reductions, as well as assembling Hexion’s Scope 3 emissions (defined as “value chain emissions”). All are expected to be finalized in the first half of 2021.
Human Capital Management
At December 31, 2017, we2020, our continuing operations had approximately 4,300 2,600employees. Approximately 37%35% of our employees are members of a labor union or are represented by workers’ councils that have collective bargaining agreements, including most of our European employees. We believe that we have good relations with our union and non-union employees. We believe our diverse global employee talent is a key driver of our future success and competitive advantage. Hexion offers industry competitive salary and benefits, performance incentive plans and enriching career opportunities that enable employee engagement. See approximate number of associates by country below:
Hexion Inc. | 15 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
hsc-20201231_g13.jpg

At Hexion, We Do the Right Thing. We act ethically and with integrity.

Acting ethically and with integrity is a core value at Hexion. This is a commitment to our company, our customers, our vendors and ourselves. Every associate, regardless of his or her rank or position is responsible for the ethical health of our organization.
Our Boardcommitment to acting ethically is non-negotiable.
We treat others with respect – regardless of Directors and sole shareholder expect honest and ethicalgender, race, age, orientation or background.
We conduct from every employee. We strive to adhere to the highest ethical standards in the conduct of our business and towith integrity – comply with all lawsanti-trust, anti-bribery, workplace harassment, and regulationsconflict-of-interest requirements.
We engage with each other and remind one another of our commitment to act with integrity.
We speak up if we witness misconduct or have a compliance concern.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

We are focused on accelerating our organization’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion worldwide, including developing and implementing a strategy to attract, retain and develop diverse talent and promote an inclusive environment where associates at all levels can perform their best. This is a top priority for us in 2021 and long term. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) has joined with other companies’ CEOs by signing the “CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge”. We also recently hired a Director of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion to help implement these goals.

At Hexion, Safety is Our Highest Priority. Our work is never more important than performing it safely.

While 2020 was a challenging year for all of us. Hexion’s associates not only endured but stayed focused on serving our customers, operating our manufacturing sites safely and supporting the communities in which they work and live. In fact, 2020 was the strongest safety performance on record for Hexion across the majority of our metrics. In 2020, we operated in the American Chemistry Council’s safety Occupational Injury and Illness Rate (“OIIR”) top quartile. This is a result of our multi-year initiative to enhanced training, alignment between our manufacturing and Environmental, Health and Safety teams, and our associates’ commitment to each other to remain vigilant as part of our “Get Zero. Get Home” safety initiative. At Hexion, we are committed to making sure that are applicableeach associate goes home just as they arrived to work.
During this pandemic, we have implemented additional guidelines to further protect the business. Each employee has a responsibility to maintainhealth and advance the ethical valuessafety of the Company. In support of this, our employees receive trainingas we continue to emphasize the importance of complianceoperate with our Codesuppliers and customers. We have committed to maintaining a paramount focus on the safety of Conduct.our employees while minimizing potential disruptions caused by COVID-19. For example, we are following all legislatively-mandated travel directives in the various countries where we operate, and we have also put additional travel restrictions in place for our associates designed to reduce the risk from COVID-19. Additionally, we are utilizing extended work from home options to protect our office associates, while adjusting our meeting protocols and processes at our manufacturing sites.

Enhancing worker safety/well-being sustainability goals

In addition to our future sustainability goals discussed above, by 2022 Hexion will offer a voluntary well-being program that addresses associate physical, mental, and financial well-being with the goal of 50% associate participation in the program by 2025. Hexion also re-affirmed its commitment to continue to drive toward zero recordable injuries.

Hexion Inc. | 16 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Where You Can Find More Information
The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) aton the SEC’s Public Reference Roomwebsite at 100 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.www.sec.gov. In addition, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports are available free of charge to the public through our internet website at www.hexion.com under “Investor Relations - SEC Filings” or. The content on the SEC’sany website at www.sec.gov.referenced in this filing is not incorporated by reference into this filing unless expressly noted otherwise.
Hexion Inc. | 17 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ITEM 1A - RISK FACTORS
(In millions, except share data)
Following are our principal risks. These factors may or may not occur, and we cannot express a view on the likelihood that any of these may occur. Other factors may exist that we do not consider significant based on information that is currently available or that we are not currently able to anticipate. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Our Business
Our operations, results and financial condition may be negatively impacted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Global or national health concerns, including the outbreak of pandemic or contagious disease, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic, may adversely affect us.

Since December 2019, the COVID-19 virus which was first reported in Wuhan, China, has spread globally. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global pandemic. Around the world, local governments’ responses to COVID-19 continue to evolve, which has led to stay-at-home orders, social distancing guidelines and other preventative measures that have disrupted various industries in the global economy and created significant volatility in the financial markets.
While the Company has continued to operate during the pandemic, it incurred adverse financial impacts to its sales and profitability results during the year ended December 31, 2020 from COVID-19, primarily related to reduced volumes associated with the pandemic. Future COVID-19 developments could adversely result in business and manufacturing disruptions, staffing impacts at our manufacturing facilities, restrictions on our employees’ ability to work and travel, inventory shortages, delivery delays, our ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, and reduced sales due to an economic downturn that could affect demand for our products. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. A prolonged economic downturn from COVID-19 could also result in impairments to long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangibles.
If global economic conditions are weak or deteriorate, it will negatively impact our business operations, results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in global economic and financial market conditions could impact our business operations in a number of ways including, but not limited to, the following:
reduced demand in key customer segments, such as building, construction, wind energy, oil and gas, automotive building, construction and electronics, compared to prior years;
weak economic conditions in our primary regions of operations: U.S., Europe, and Asia;
payment delays by customers and reduced demand for our products caused by customer insolvencies and/or the inability of customers to obtain adequate financing to maintain operationsoperations;
insolvency of suppliers or the failure of suppliers to meet their commitments resulting in product delays;
more onerous credit and commercial terms from our suppliers such as shortening the required payment period for outstanding accounts receivable or reducing or eliminating the amount of trade credit available to us; and
potential delays in accessing our senior secured asset based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”) or obtaining new credit facilities on terms we deem commercially reasonable or at all,ABL Facility and the potential inability of one or more of the financial institutions included in our syndicated ABL Facility to fulfill their funding obligations. Should a bank in
    Many of our syndicated ABL Facility be unablekey customer segments are sensitive to fund a future draw request, we could find it difficult to replace that bank inmacroeconomic conditions, which are currently uncertain. Accordingly, the facility.
Due to worldwide economic volatilityshort and uncertainty, the short-termlong-term outlook for our business is difficult to predict.predict and our results of operations could, as a result of this uncertainty, fall below our expectations.

Hexion Inc. | 18 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Fluctuations in direct or indirect raw material costs could have an adverse impact on our business.
Raw materials costs made up approximately 70%75% of our cost of sales (excluding depreciation expense) in 2017.2020. The prices of our direct and indirect raw materials have been, and we expect them to continue to be, volatile. If the cost of direct or indirect raw materials increases significantly and we are unable to offset the increased costs with higher selling prices, our profitability will decline. Increases in prices for our products could also hurt our ability to remain both competitive and profitable in the markets in which we compete.
Although some of our materialsmaterial contracts include competitive price clauses that allow us to buy outside the contract if market pricing falls below contract pricing, and certain contracts have minimum-maximum monthly volume commitments that allow us to take advantage of spot pricing, we may be unable to purchase raw materials at market prices. In addition, some of our customer contracts have fixed prices for a certain term, and as a result, we may not be able to pass on raw material price increases to our customers immediately, if at all. Due to differences in timing of the pricing trigger points between our sales and purchase contracts, there is often a “lead-lag” impact. In many cases this “lead-lag” impact can negatively impact our margins in the short term in periods of rising raw material prices and positively impact them in the short term in periods of falling raw material prices. Future raw material prices may be impacted by new laws or regulations, suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers, changes in our supplier manufacturing processes as some of our products are byproducts of these processes, interruptions in production by suppliers, natural disasters, volatility in the price of crude oil and related petrochemical products and changes in exchange rates.
An inadequate supply of direct or indirect raw materials and intermediate products could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our manufacturing operations require adequate supplies of raw materials and intermediate products on a timely basis. The loss of a key source or a delay in shipments could have a material adverse effect on our business. Raw material availability may be subject to curtailment or change due to, among other things:
new or existing laws or regulations;
suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers;
interruptions in production by suppliers; and
natural disasters.

Many of our raw materials and intermediate products are available in the quantities we require from a limited number of suppliers. Should any of our key suppliers fail to deliver these raw materials or intermediate products to us or no longer supply us, we may be unable to purchase these materials in necessary quantities, which could adversely affect our volumes, or may not be able to purchase them at prices that would allow us to remain competitive. During the past several years, certain of our suppliers have experienced force majeure events rendering them unable to deliver all, or a portion of, the contracted-for raw materials. On these occasions, we have been forced to limit production or were forced to purchase replacement raw materials in the open market at significantly higher costs or place our customers on an allocation of our products. In the past, some of our customers have chosen to discontinue or decrease the use of our products as a result of these measures. We have experienced force majeure events by certain of our suppliers which have had significant negative impacts on our business. For example, in 2014, Shell notified us of aover the past several years there have been various supply interruption event at its Moerdijk, Netherlands facility,events due to hurricanes, supplier production fires and other supply issues which provideshave impacted our ability to obtain key raw materials to us, and this event resulted in us allocating certain products to our customers through mid-2015, at which point the disruption was resolved. In addition,materials. Additionally, we cannot predict whether new regulations or restrictions may be imposed in the future which may result in reduced supply or further increases in prices. We cannot assure investors that we will be able to renew our current materials contracts or enter into replacement contracts on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. Fluctuations in the price of these or other raw materials or intermediate products, the loss of a key source of supply or any delay in the supply could result in a material adverse effect on our business.
Our production facilities are subject to significant operating hazards which could cause environmental contamination, personal injury and loss of life, and severe damage to, or destruction of, property and equipment.
Our production facilities are subject to hazards associated with the manufacturing, handling, storage and transportation of chemical materials and products, including human exposure to hazardous substances, pipeline and equipment leaks and ruptures, explosions, fires, inclement weather and natural disasters, mechanical failures, unscheduled downtime, transportation interruptions, remedial complications, chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, storage tank leaks and other environmental risks. Additionally, a number of our operations are adjacent to operations of independent entities that engage in hazardous and potentially dangerous activities. Our operations or adjacent operations could result in personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property or equipment, environmental damage, or a loss of the use of all or a portion of one of our key manufacturing facilities. Such events at our facilities, or adjacent third-party facilities, could have a material adverse effect on us.
We may incur losses beyond the limits or coverage of our insurance policies for liabilities that are associated with these hazards. In addition, various kinds of insurance for companies in the chemical industry have not been available on commercially acceptable terms, or, in some cases, have been unavailable altogether. In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, and our premiums may increase significantly on coverage that we maintain.

Hexion Inc. | 19 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Environmental obligations and liabilities could have a substantial negative impact on our financial condition, cash flows and profitability.
Our operations involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials and are subject to extensive and complex U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. supranational, national, provincial, and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These environmental laws and regulations include those that govern the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the generation, use, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites, occupational health and safety and the safe operation of our equipment, and those requiring permits, licenses, or other government approvals for specified operations or activities. Our products are also subject to a variety of international, national, regional, state, and provincial requirements and restrictions applicable to the manufacture, import, export or subsequent use of such products. In addition, we are required to maintain, and may be required to obtain in the future, environmental, health and safety permits, licenses, or government approvals to continue current operations at most of our manufacturing and research facilities throughout the world.
Compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, and maintenance of permits, can be costly and complex, and we have incurred and will continue to incur costs, including capital expenditures and costs associated with the issuance and maintenance of letters of credit, to comply with these requirements. In 2017, we2020, our continuing operations incurred capital expenditures of $25 approximately $13to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and to make other environmental improvements. If we are unable to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, or maintain our permits, we could incur substantial costs, including fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims or costs associated with upgrades to our facilities or changes in our manufacturing processes in order to achieve and maintain compliance, and may also be required to halt permitted activities or operations until any necessary permits can be obtained or complied with, or decide to close the impacted facility. In addition, future developments or increasingly stringent regulations could require us to make additional unforeseen environmental expenditures, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Environmental, health and safety requirements change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. We cannot predict what environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or permit requirements will be enacted or amended in the future, how existing or future laws or regulations will be interpreted or enforced or the impact of such laws, regulations or permits on future production expenditures, supply chain or sales. Our costs of compliance with current and future environmental, health and safety requirements could be material. Such future requirements include legislation designed to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other substances associated with climate change (“greenhouse gases”). The European Union has enacted greenhouse gas emissions legislation and continues to expand the scope of such legislation. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “USEPA”) has promulgated regulations applicable to projects involving greenhouse gas emissions above a certain threshold, and the United States and certain states within the United States have enacted, or are considering, limitations on greenhouse gas emissions. These requirements to limit greenhouse gas emissions could significantly increase our energy costs, and may also require us to incur material capital costs to modify our manufacturing facilities.

In addition, we are subject to liability associated with hazardous substances in soil, groundwater and elsewhere at a number of sites. These include sites that we formerly owned or operated and sites where hazardous wastes and other substances from our current and former facilities and operations have been sent, treated, stored, or recycled or disposed of, as well as sites that we currently own or operate. Depending upon the circumstances, our liability may be strict, joint and several, meaning that we may be held responsible for more than our proportionate share, or even all, of the liability involved regardless of our fault or whether we are aware of the conditions giving rise to the liability. Even where liability has been allocated among parties, we may be subject to material changes in such allocation in the future for a number of reasons, including the discovery of new contamination, the insolvency of a responsible party, or a heightened nexus to the remediation site. Environmental conditions at these sites can lead to environmental cleanup liability and claims against us for personal injury or wrongful death, property damages and natural resource damages, as well as to claims and obligations for the investigation and cleanup of environmental conditions. The extent of any of these liabilities is difficult to predict, but in the aggregate such liabilities could be material.
We have been notified that we are or may be responsible for environmental remediation at a number of sites in North America, Europe and South America. We are also performing a number of voluntary cleanups. The most significant sites at which we are performing or participating in environmental remediation are sites formerly owned by us in Geismar, Louisiana and Plant City, Florida. As the result of former, current or future operations, there may be additional environmental remediation or restoration liabilities or claims of personal injury by employees or members of the public due to exposure or alleged exposure to hazardous materials in connection with our operations, properties or products. Sites sold by us in past years may have significant site closure or remediation costs and our share, if any, may be unknown to us at this time. These environmental liabilities or obligations, or any that may arise or become known to us in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and profitability.
Future chemical regulatory actions may decrease our profitability.
Several governmental agencies have enacted, are considering or may consider in the future, regulations that may impact our ability to sell certain chemical products in certain geographic areas. The European Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (“REACH”) regulation requires manufacturers, importers and consumers of certain chemicals manufactured in, or imported into, the European Union to register such chemicals and evaluate their potential impacts on human health and the environment. REACH may result in certain chemicals being further regulated, restricted or banned from use in the European Union. In addition, the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (“LCSA”) was signed into law on June 22, 2016, and updates and revises the Toxic Substances Control Act. LCSA requires the implementing agency to conduct risk evaluations on high priority chemicals, which could include chemical products we manufacture. Other countries have implemented, or are considering implementation of, similar chemical regulatory programs. When fully implemented, REACH, LCSA and other similar regulatory programs may result in significant adverse market impacts on the
Hexion Inc. | 20 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
affected chemical products. If we fail to comply with REACH, LCSA or other similar laws and regulations, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement actions, including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and profitability. Additionally, studies conducted in association with these regulatory programs, or otherwise conducted through trade associations, may result in new information regarding the health effects and environmental impact of our products and raw materials. Such studies could result in future regulations restricting the manufacture or use of our products, liability for adverse environmental or health effects linked to our products, and/or de-selection of our products for specific applications. These restrictions, liability, and product de-selection could have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial condition and/or liquidity.
Because of certain government public health agencies’ concerns regarding the potential for adverse human health effects, formaldehyde is a regulated chemical and public health agencies continue to evaluate its safety. A division of the World Health Organization, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, or IARC, and the National Toxicology Program, or NTP, within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, have classified formaldehyde as being carcinogenic to humans. The USEPA, under its Integrated Risk Information System, or IRIS, released a draft of its toxicological review of formaldehyde in 2010, stating that formaldehyde meets the criteria to be described as “carcinogenic to humans.” The National Academy of Sciences peer reviewed the draft IRIS toxicological review and issued a report in April 2011 that criticized the draft IRIS toxicological review and stated that the methodologies and the underlying science used in the draft IRIS review did not clearly support a conclusion of a causal link between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia. USEPA may or may not issue a revised draft IRIS toxicological review to reflect the NAS findings, including the conclusions regarding a causal link between formaldehyde exposure and leukemia. Formaldehyde has been designated to undergo a risk evaluation under the 2016 amended Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The TSCA review process for formaldehyde has started and a final risk determination is expected at the end of 2022. The risk evaluation will include an assessment of most consumer, general public and occupational exposure conditions of use. The final risk determinations will drive how the chemistry of formaldehyde and its many applications will be regulated going forward. A high-priority designation means the EPA has nominated formaldehyde for further risk evaluation. Effective January 1, 2016, ECHA classified formaldehyde as a Category 2 Mutagen, but rejected reclassificationinstead, classified it as a Category 1A Carcinogen.1B "presumed carcinogen. It is possible that new regulatory requirements could be promulgated to limit human exposure to formaldehyde, that we could incur substantial additional costs to meet any such regulatory requirements, and that there could be a reduction in demand for our formaldehyde-based products. These additional costs and reduced demand could have a material adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

BPA, which is manufactured and used as an intermediate at our Deer Park, Texas, and Pernis, Netherlands and Duisburg, Germany manufacturing facilities, and is also sold directly to third parties, is currently considered under certain state and international regulatory programs as a reproductive toxicant and an “endocrine disrupter,” meaning BPA could disrupt normal biological processes. BPA continues to be subject to scientific, regulatory and legislative review and negative media attention. In Europe, the EU Committee for Risk Assessment adopted an opinion to change the existing harmonized classification and labeling of BPA from a category 2 reproductive Toxicant to a category 1B reproductive Toxicant. This classification change will becomewas effective beginning March 1, 2018. The EU Member State Committee agreed to add BPA to the Substance of Very High Concern (“SVHC”) candidate list based upon its classification as a reproductive toxicant, as well as for its endocrine disrupting properties to both human health and the environment. The REACH Risk Management Option Analysis (RMOA) was released July 6, 2017, in which BPA is identified as an endocrine disruptor for the environment due to its aquatic toxicity with no safe threshold, and REACH restrictions are identified as the preferred risk management measure. In addition, certain BPA-containing products (phenolic hardeners for epoxy resins) have been proposed for authorization under REACH. The decision to initiate the authorization process has not been taken yet, but may occur. The California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) listed BPA under Proposition 65 as a developmental and reproductive toxicant, requiring warning labels unless BPA exposures are shown to be less than a risk-based level (the maximum allowable dose level (“MADL”)). As of May 11, 2016, products containing BPA sold into California must comply with Proposition 65’s requirements. Despite these hazard designations and listings, the US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) is also actively engaged in the scientific and regulatory review of BPA and, in a letter submitted to OEHHA dated April 6, 2015, reaffirmed that BPA is safe as currently permitted in FDA-regulated food contact uses and concluded that FDA’s National Center for Toxicological Research study did not support the listing of BPA as a reproductive toxicant. In 2018, NTP released the results of the CLARITY Core Study. Senior scientists at FDA’s National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) conducted the study with funding from NTP. The study involved exposure of laboratory animals to BPA beginning and during pregnancy and continuing in the offspring throughout their entire lifetime. A wide range of dose levels were examined, from low doses close to actual consumer exposure to doses about 250,000 times higher.As stated in the conclusion of the study report, “BPA produced minimal effects that were distinguishable from background.” NTP selected a panel of six independent expert scientists to conduct a formal peer review of the study. In general, the peer review panel supported the design and conduct of the study and agreed with the overall conclusion that the study found minimal effects for the range of doses studied. In December 2012, France enacted a law that bans direct contact of packaging containing BPA with food and consumer products. In January 2015, the European Food Safety Authority (“EFSA”) concluded that BPA poses no health risk to consumers of any age group (including unborn children, infants and adolescents) at currently permitted exposure levels. EFSA confirmed this conclusion in October 2016. RegulatoryEFSA is concluding its re-evaluation of BPA in food contact applications and the results are expected in 2021.Regulatory and legislative initiatives such as these, or product de-selection resulting from such regulatory actions, may result in a reduction in demand for BPA and our products containing BPA and could also result in additional liabilities as well as an increase in operating costs to meet more stringent regulations. Such increases in operating costs and/or reduction in demand could have a material adverse effect on our operations and profitability.
Scientists periodically conduct studies on the potential human health and environmental impacts of chemicals, including products we manufacture and sell. Also, nongovernmental advocacy organizations and individuals periodically issue public statements alleging human health and environmental impacts of chemicals, including products we manufacture and sell. Based upon such studies or public statements, our customers may elect to discontinue the purchase and use of our products, even in the absence of any government regulation. Such actions could significantly decrease the demand for our products and, accordingly, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and profitability.
Hexion Inc. | 21 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
We are subject to certain risks related to litigation filed by or against us, and adverse results may harm our business.
We cannot predict with certainty the cost of defense, of prosecution or of the ultimate outcome of litigation and other proceedings filed by or against us, including penalties or other civil or criminal sanctions, or remedies or damage awards, and adverse results in any litigation and other proceedings may materially harm our business. Litigation and other proceedings may include, but are not limited to, actions relating to intellectual property, international trade, commercial arrangements, product liability, environmental, health and safety, joint venture agreements, labor and employment or other harms resulting from the actions of individuals or entities outside of our control. In the case of intellectual property litigation and proceedings, adverse outcomes could include the cancellation, invalidation or other loss of material intellectual property rights used in our business and injunctions prohibiting our use of business processes or technology that are subject to third-party patents or other third-party intellectual property rights. Litigation based on environmental matters or exposure to hazardous substances in the workplace or based upon the use of our products could result in significant liability for us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability.
Because we manufacture and use materials that are known to be hazardous, we are subject to, or affected by, certain product and manufacturing regulations, for which compliance can be costly and time consuming. In addition, we may be subject to personal injury or product liability claims as a result of human exposure to such hazardous materials.
We produce hazardous chemicals that require care in handling and use that are subject to regulation by many U.S. and non-U.S. national, supra-national, state and local governmental authorities. In some circumstances, these authorities must review and, in some cases approve, our products and/or manufacturing processes and facilities before we may manufacture and sell some of these chemicals. To be able to manufacture and sell certain new chemical products, we may be required, among other things, to demonstrate to the relevant authority that the product does not pose an unreasonable risk during its intended uses and/or that we are capable of manufacturing the product in compliance with current regulations. The process of seeking any necessary approvals can be costly, time consuming and subject to unanticipated and significant delays. Approvals may not be granted to us on a timely basis, or at all. Any delay in obtaining, or any failure to obtain or maintain, these approvals would adversely affect our ability to introduce new products and to generate revenue from those products. New laws and regulations may be introduced in the future that could result in additional compliance costs, bans on product sales or use, seizures, confiscation, recall or monetary fines, any of which could prevent or inhibit the development, distribution or sale of our products and could increase our customers’ efforts to find less hazardous substitutes for our products. We are subject to ongoing reviews of our products and manufacturing processes.
As discussed above, we manufacture and sell products containing formaldehyde, and certain governmental bodies have stated that there is a causal link between formaldehyde exposure and certain types of cancer, including myeloid leukemia and NPC. These conclusions could adversely impact our business and also become the basis of product liability litigation.

Other products we have made or used have been and could be the focus of legal claims based upon allegations of harm to human health. While we cannot predict the outcome of pending suits and claims, we believe that we maintain adequate reserves, in accordance with our accounting policy, to address currently pending litigation and are adequately insured to cover currently pending and foreseeable future claims. However, an unfavorable outcome in these litigation matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability and cause our reputation to decline.
We are subject to claims from our customers and their employees, environmental action groups and neighbors living near our production facilities.
We produce and use hazardous chemicals that require appropriate procedures and care to be used in handling them or in using them to manufacture other products. As a result of the hazardous nature of some of the products we produce and use, we may face claims relating to incidents that involve our customers’ improper handling, storage and use of our products. We have historically faced lawsuits, including class action lawsuits that claim liability for death, injury or property damage caused by products that we manufacture or that contain our components. Additionally, we may face lawsuits alleging personal injury or property damage by neighbors living near our production facilities. These lawsuits, and any future lawsuits, could result in substantial damage awards against us, which in turn could encourage additional lawsuits and could cause us to incur significant legal fees to defend such lawsuits, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability. In addition, the activities of environmental action groups could result in litigation or damage to our reputation.

Our manufacturing facilities are subject to disruption due to operating hazards
The storage, handling, manufacturing and transportation of chemicals at our facilities and adjacent facilities could result in leaks, spills, fires or explosions, which could result in production downtime, production delays, raw material supply delays, interruptions and environmental hazards. We have experienced incidents at our own facilities and a raw material supplier located adjacent to our facility that have resulted mostly in short term, but some long term, production delays. Production interruption may also result from severe weather, particularly with respect to our southern U.S. operations near the Gulf Coast. Production lapses caused by any such delays can often be absorbed by our other manufacturing facilities, and we maintain insurance to cover such potential events. However, such events could negatively affect our operations.

Hexion Inc. | 22 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
As a global business, we are subject to numerous risks associated with our international operations that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We have significant manufacturing and other operations outside the United States. Some of these operations are in jurisdictions with unstable political or economic conditions. There are numerous inherent risks in international operations, including, but not limited to:
exchange controls and currency restrictions;
currency fluctuations and devaluations;
tariffs and trade barriers imposed by the current U.S. administration or foreign governments;
renegotiation of trade agreements by the current U.S. administration;
export duties and quotas;
changes in local economic conditions;
changes in laws and regulations;
exposure to possible expropriation or other government actions;
acts by national or regional banks, including the European Central Bank, to increase or restrict the availability of credit;
hostility from local populations;
diminished ability to legally enforce our contractual rights in non-U.S. countries;
restrictions on our ability to repatriate dividends from our subsidiaries; and
unsettled political conditions and possible terrorist attacks against U.S. interests.
Our international operations expose us to different local political and business risks and challenges. For example, we may face potential difficulties in staffing and managing local operations, and we may have to design local solutions to manage credit risks of local customers and distributors. In addition, some of our operations are located in regions that may be politically unstable, having particular exposure to riots, civil commotion or civil unrests,unrest, acts of war (declared or undeclared) or armed hostilities or other national or international calamity. In some of these regions, our status as a U.S. company also exposes us to increased risk of sabotage, terrorist attacks, interference by civil or military authorities or to greater impact from the national and global military, diplomatic and financial response to any future attacks or other threats.
In addition, intellectual property rights may be more difficult to enforce in non-U.S. or non-Western European countries.
If global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in Europe, China, Brazil, Australia, the United States or other key markets remain uncertain or deteriorate further, the value of associated foreign currencies and the global credit markets may weaken. Additionally, general financial instability in countries where we do not transact a significant amount of business could have a contagion effect and contribute to the general instability and uncertainty within a particular region or globally. If this were to occur, it could adversely affect our customers and suppliers and in turn have a materially adverse effect on our international business and results of operations.

Our overall success as a global business depends, in part, upon our ability to succeed under different economic, social and political conditions. We may fail to develop and implement policies and strategies that are effective in each location where we do business, and failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is subject to foreign currency risk.
In 2017,2020, approximately 60%54% of our net sales originated outside the United States. In our consolidated financial statements, we translate our local currency financial results into U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during a reporting period or the exchange rate at the end of that period. During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, at a constant level of business, our reported international revenues and earnings would be reduced because the local currency would translate into fewer U.S. dollars.
In addition to currency translation risks, we incur a currency transaction risk whenever we enter into a purchase or a sales transaction or indebtedness transaction using a different currency from the currency in which we record revenues. Given the recent volatility of exchange rates, we may not manage our currency transaction and/or translation risks effectively, and volatility in currency exchange rates may materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations, including our tax obligations. Since the vast majority of our indebtedness is denominated in U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar could make it more difficult for us to repay our indebtedness.
We have entered and expect to continue to enter into various hedging and other programs in an effort to protect against adverse changes in the non-U.S. exchange markets and attempt to minimize potential material adverse effects. These hedging and other programs may be unsuccessful in protecting against these risks. Our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if the U.S. dollar strengthens against non-U.S. currencies and our protective strategies are not successful. Likewise, a strengthening U.S. dollar provides opportunities to source raw materials more cheaply from foreign countries.
Fluctuations in energy costs could have an adverse impact on our profitability and negatively affect our financial condition.
Oil and natural gas prices have fluctuated greatly over the past several years and we anticipate that they will continue to do so. Natural gas and electricity are essential to our manufacturing processes, which are energy-intensive. Our energy costs represented approximately 4% of our total cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
Hexion Inc. | 23 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Our operating expenses will increase if our energy prices increase. Increased energy prices may also result in greater raw materials costs. If we cannot pass these costs through to our customers, our profitability may decline. Increased energy costs may also negatively affect our customers and the demand for our products. In addition, as oil and natural gas prices fall, while having a positive effect on our overall costs, such falling prices can have a negative impact on our oilfield business, as the number of oil and natural gas wells drilled declines in response to market condition.
If energy prices decrease, we expect benefits in the short-run with decreased operating expenses and increased operating income, but may face increased pricing pressure from competitors that are similarly impacted by energy prices. As a result, profitability may decrease over an extended period of time of lower energy prices. Moreover, any future increases in energy prices after a period of lower energy prices may have an adverse impact on our profitability for the reasons described above.

Globally, our operations are increasingly subject to regulations that seek to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”), such as carbon dioxide and methane. The European Union (the “EU”) GHG Emissions Trading System (“ETS”), established pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol to reduce GHG emissions in the EU. The EU has set a binding target to reduce domestic GHG emissions by at least 40% below the 1990 level by 2030 and a binding target to increase the share of renewable energy to at least 32% of the EU’s energy consumption by 2030. The European Commission proposed to increase the greenhouse gas emission reduction target to at least 55% in September 2020, and expects to complete the associated legislative proposals by June 2021. Additionally, Domestic efforts to curb GHG emissions are being led by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (the “EPA”) GHG regulations and similar programs of certain states. To the extent that our foreign or domestic operations are subject to either the EU’s or the EPA’s GHG regulations, we may face increased capital and operating costs associated with our current, new or expanded facilities.
We are already managing and reporting GHG emissions, to varying degrees, as required by law for our sites in locations subject to U.S. federal and state requirements, Kyoto Protocol obligations and/or ETS requirements. Although these sites are subject to existing GHG legislation, few have experienced or anticipate significant cost increases as a result of these programs, although it is possible that GHG emission restrictions may increase over time.
We face increased competition from other companies and from substitute products, which could force us to lower our prices, which would adversely affect our profitability and financial condition.
Several of the markets that we operate in are highly competitive, and this competition could harm our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Our competitors include major international producers as well as smaller regional competitors. We believe that the most significant competitive factor that impacts demand for certain of our products is selling price. We may be forced to lower our selling price based on our competitors’ pricing decisions, which would reduce our profitability. Certain markets that we serve have become commoditized in recent years and have given rise to several industry participants, resulting in fierce price competition in these markets. In addition, we face competition from a number of products that are potential substitutes for our products. Growth in substitute products could adversely affect our market share, net sales and profit margins.
Additional trends include current and anticipated consolidation among our competitors and customers which may cause us to lose market share as well as put downward pressure on pricing. There is also a trend in our industries toward relocating manufacturing facilities to lower cost regions, such as Asia, which may permit some of our competitors to lower their costs and improve their competitive position. Furthermore, there has been an increase in new competitors based in these regions.
Some of our competitors are larger, have greater financial resources, have a lower cost structure, and/or have less debt than we do. As a result, those competitors may be better able to withstand a change in conditions within our industry and in the economy as a whole. If we do not compete successfully, our operating margins, financial condition, cash flows and profitability could be adversely affected. Furthermore, if we do not have adequate capital to invest in technology, including expenditures for research and development, our technology could be rendered uneconomical or obsolete, negatively affecting our ability to remain competitive.

We expect substantial cost savings from our ongoing strategic initiatives, and if we are unable to achieve these cost savings, or sustain our current cost structure, it could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations and financial condition.
We have not yet realized all of the cost savings and synergies we expect to achieve from our ongoing strategic initiatives. A variety of risks could cause us not to realize the expected cost savings and synergies, including but not limited to, higher than expected severance costs related to staff reductions; higher than expected retention costs for employees that will be retained; higher than expected stand-alone overhead expenses; delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to our cost-savings plans; and other unexpected costs associated with operating our business. In November 2017,During 2020, we initiated new cost reduction programs that we expect to generate approximately $43 of annual savings once fully implemented. As of December 31, 2017, we had $50 of total in-processachieved $23 in cost savings related to newour cost reduction programs and existing programs.as of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $6 of additional in-process cost savings.
If we are unable to achieve these cost savings or synergies it could adversely affect our profitability and financial condition. In addition, while we have been successful in reducing costs and generating savings, factors may arise that may not allow us to sustain our current cost structure. As market and economic conditions change, we may also make changes to our operating cost structure.

Hexion Inc. | 24 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, and our inability to enforce these rights could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position.
We rely on the patent, trademark, copyright and trade-secret laws of the United States and the countries where we do business to protect our intellectual property rights. We may be unable to prevent third parties from using our intellectual property without our authorization. The unauthorized use of our intellectual property could reduce any competitive advantage we have developed, reduce our market share or otherwise harm our business. In the event of unauthorized use of our intellectual property, litigation to protect or enforce our rights could be costly, and we may not prevail.
Many of our technologies are not covered by any patent or patent application, and our issued and pending U.S. and non-U.S. patents may not provide us with any competitive advantage and could be challenged by third parties. Our inability to secure issuance of our pending patent applications may limit our ability to protect the intellectual property rights these pending patent applications were intended to cover. Our competitors may attempt to design around our patents to avoid liability for infringement and, if successful, our competitors could adversely affect our market share. Furthermore, the expiration of our patents may lead to increased competition.
Our pending trademark applications may not be approved by the responsible governmental authorities and, even if these trademark applications are granted, third parties may seek to oppose or otherwise challenge these trademark applications. A failure to obtain trademark registrations in the United States and in other countries could limit our ability to protect our products and their associated trademarks and impede our marketing efforts in those jurisdictions.
In addition, effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries. In some countries we do not apply for patent, trademark or copyright protection. We also rely on unpatented proprietary manufacturing expertise, continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop and maintain our competitive position. While we generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and third parties to protect our intellectual property, these confidentiality agreements are limited in duration and could be breached, and may not provide meaningful protection of our trade secrets or proprietary manufacturing expertise. Adequate remedies may not be available if there is an unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets and manufacturing expertise. In addition, others may obtain knowledge about our trade secrets through independent development or by legal means. The failure to protect our processes, apparatuses, technology, trade secrets and proprietary manufacturing expertise, methods and compounds could have a material adverse effect on our business by jeopardizing critical intellectual property.
Where a product formulation or process is kept as a trade secret, third parties may independently develop or invent and patent products or processes identical to our trade-secret products or processes. This could have an adverse impact on our ability to make and sell products or use such processes and could potentially result in costly litigation in which we might not prevail.
We could face intellectual property infringement claims that could result in significant legal costs and damages and impede our ability to produce key products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our production processes and products are specialized; however, we could face intellectual property infringement claims from our competitors or others alleging that our processes or products infringe on their proprietary technology. If we were subject to an infringement suit, we may be required to change our processes or products, or stop using certain technologies or producing the infringing product entirely. Even if we ultimately prevail in an infringement suit, the existence of the suit could cause our customers to seek other products that are not subject to infringement suits. Any infringement suit could result in significant legal costs and damages and impede our ability to produce key products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on certain of our key executives and our ability to attract and retain qualified employees.
Our ability to operate our business and implement our strategies depends, in part, on the skills, experience and efforts of key members of our leadership team. We do not maintain any key-mankey-individual insurance on any of these individuals. In addition, our success will depend on, among other factors, our ability to attract and retain other managerial, scientific and technical qualified personnel, particularly research scientists, technical sales professionals, and engineers who have specialized skills required by our business and focused on the industries in which we compete. Competition for qualified employees in the chemicals industry is intense and the loss of the services of any of our key employees or the failure to attract or retain other qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business or business prospects. Further, if any of these executives or employees joins a competitor, we could lose customers and suppliers and incur additional expenses to recruit and train personnel, who require time to become productive and to learn our business.
Our majority shareholder’s interest may conflict with or differ from our interests.
Apollo controls our ultimate parent company, Hexion Holdings LLC, or Hexion Holdings, which indirectly owns 100% of our common equity. In addition, Apollo has significant representation on Hexion Holdings’ Board of Managers. As a result, Apollo can significantly influence our ability to enter into significant corporate transactions such as mergers, tender offers and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets. The interests of Apollo and its affiliates could conflict with or differ from our interests. For example, the concentration of ownership held by Apollo could delay, defer or prevent a change of control of our company or impede a merger, takeover or other business combination which may otherwise be favorable for us.
Additionally, Apollo is in the business of making investments in companies and may, from time to time, acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete, directly or indirectly with us. Apollo may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. Additionally, even if Apollo invests in competing businesses through Hexion Holdings, such investments may be made through a newly-formed subsidiary of Hexion Holdings. Any such investment may increase the potential for the conflicts of interest discussed in this risk factor.
So long as Apollo continues to indirectly own a significant amount of the equity of Hexion Holdings, even if such amount is less than 50%, they will continue to be able to substantially influence or effectively control our ability to enter into any corporate transactions.
Because our equity securities are not and will not be registered under the securities laws of the United States or in any other jurisdiction and are not listed on any U.S. securities exchange, we are not subject to certain of the corporate governance requirements of U.S. securities authorities or to any corporate governance requirements of any U.S. securities exchanges.
If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements with our works councils and labor unions as they expire from time to time, if disputes with our works councils or unions arise, or if our unionized or represented employees were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, approximately 37%35% of our employees were unionized or represented by works councils that were covered by collective bargaining agreements. In addition, some of our employees reside in countries in which employment laws provide greater bargaining or other employee rights than the laws of the United States. These rights may require us to expend more time and money altering or amending employees’ terms of employment or making staff reductions. For example, most of our employees in Europe are represented by works councils, which generally must approve changes in conditions of employment, including restructuring initiatives and changes in salaries and benefits. A significant dispute could divert our management’s attention and otherwise hinder our ability to conduct our business or to achieve planned cost savings.
Hexion Inc. | 25 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
We may be unable to timely extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements as they expire. We have collective bargaining agreements which will expire during the next two years. We also may be subject to strikes or work stoppages by, or disputes with, our labor unions. If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements, if disputes with our works councils or unions arise or if our unionized or represented workers engage in a strike or other work stoppage, we could incur higher labor costs or experience a significant disruption of operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.
OurCertain of our pension plans are unfunded or under-funded and our required cash contributions could be higher than we expect, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.
We sponsor various pension and similar benefit plans worldwide.
Our U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans were under-funded in the aggregate by $25$35 and $224,$154, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.2020. We are legally required to make contributions to our pension plans in the future, and those contributions could be material.
In 2018, we do not expect to make any contributions to our U.S. defined benefit pension plan and2021, we expect to contribute approximately $23$3 and $33 to our U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans, respectively, which we believe is sufficient to meet the minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee benefit and tax laws.
Our future funding obligations for our employee benefit plans depend upon the levels of benefits provided for by the plans, the future performance of assets set aside for these plans, the rates of interest used to determine funding levels, the impact of potential business dispositions, actuarial data and experience, and any changes in government laws and regulations. In addition, certain of our funded employee benefit plans hold a significant amount of equity securities. If the market values of these securities decline, our pension expense and funding requirements would increase and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Any decrease in interest rates and asset returns, if and to the extent not offset by contributions, could increase our obligations under these plans. If the performance of assets in the funded plans does not meet our expectations, our cash contributions for these plans could be higher than we expect, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.
Natural or other disasters have, and could in the future, disrupt our business and result in loss of revenue or higher expenses.
Any serious disruption at any of our facilities, our suppliers’ facilities or our suppliers’customers’ facilities due to hurricane, fire, earthquake, flood, terrorist attack, public health crises (including, but not limited to, the coronavirus outbreak) or any other natural or man-made disaster could impair our ability to use our facilities or demand from our customers and have a material adverse impact on our revenues and increase our costs and expenses. If there is a natural disaster or other serious disruption at any of our facilities or our suppliers’ facilities, it could impair our ability to adequately supply our customers and negatively impact our operating results. For example, our manufacturing facilities in the U.S. Gulf Coast region were impacted by Hurricane Harvey in 2017. In addition, many of our current and potential customers are concentrated in specific geographic areas. A disaster in one of these regions could have a material adverse impact on our operations, operating results and financial condition. Our business interruption insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our losses from a disaster, in which case our unreimbursed losses could be substantial. Some of our operations are located in regions with particular exposure to natural disasters such as storms, floods, fires and earthquakes. It would be difficult or impossible for us to relocate these operations and, as a result, any of the aforementioned occurrences could materially adversely affect our business. At the time of this filing, the coronavirus has not had a material impact to our operations or financial results, however any future impacts of the coronavirus are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
Security breaches
    Cyber security attacks and other disruptions to our information technology infrastructuresystems could interfere with our operations, and could compromise our information and the information of our customers and suppliers, exposing us to liability which would causeadversely affect our relationships with business partners and harm our brands, reputation to suffer.and financial results.

In the ordinary course of business, we rely upon information technology networks and systems, some of which are managed by third parties, to process, transmit and store electronicdigital information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including supply chain, manufacturing, distribution, invoicing, and collection of payments from customers. We use information technology systems to record, process and summarize financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory financial reporting, legal and tax requirements. Additionally, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, the propriety business information of our customers, suppliers and Momentive Performance Materials Inc. (“MPM”) under the Shared Services Agreement, as well as personally identifiable information of our customers and employees and MPM, in data centers and on information technology networks.

The secure operation of these informationour systems or the technology networks,systems of third parties on which we rely, and the processing and maintenance of this information is critical to our business operations and strategy. Despite security measures and business continuity plans,We recently transitioned certain of our information technology, networksprocurement administration, accounting and infrastructurefinance functions to our new third party business services partner. Failure to effectively implement these technology services could expose us to security breaches, processing integrity, availability of data and financial reporting integrity. Implementation failure or execution issues with our third party business services partner could lead to a loss of revenue, supply chain issues, disruption of business, loss of customers or regulatory non-compliance.

Despite actions to mitigate or eliminate risk, our information systems may be vulnerable to damage, disruptions or shutdowns due to attacks bythe activity of hackers, or breaches due to employee error or malfeasance, or other disruptions during the process of upgrading or replacing computer software or hardware,including, power outages, computer viruses, telecommunication or utility failures, or natural disasters or other catastrophic events. The occurrence of any of these events could compromise our networkssystems and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, disrupt operations, and damage our reputation which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Hexion Inc. | 26 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Divestitures that we pursue may present unforeseen obstacles and costs and alter the synergies we expect to continue to achieve from our ongoing cost reduction programs. Acquisitions and joint ventures that we pursue may present unforeseen integration obstacles and costs, increase our leverage and negatively impact our performance.
We have selectively made, and may in the future, pursue divestitures of certain of our businesses as one element of our portfolio optimization strategy.strategy, including the recently announced Purchase Agreement for the sale of our PSR, Hexamine and European-based Forest Products Resins businesses. Divestitures may require us to separate integrated assets and personnel from our retained businesses and devote our resources to transitioning assets and services to purchasers, resulting in disruptions to our ongoing business and distraction of management. Divestitures may alter synergies we expect to continue to achieve from our ongoing cost reduction programs. In the event of a large divestiture, we could use a significant amount of net operating losses which could result in our U.S. Company incurring future cash taxes. In addition, divestitures may result in the retention of certain current and future liabilities as well as obligations to indemnify or reimburse a buyer for certain liabilities of a divested business. These potential obligations could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition if triggered.
In addition, we have made acquisitions of related businesses, and entered into joint ventures in the past and could selectively pursue acquisitions of, and joint ventures with, related businesses as one element of our growth strategy. If such acquisitions are consummated, the risk factors we describe above and below, and for our business generally, may be intensified.intensified or we may be subject to new risks as a result of such acquisitions.

We could face additional income tax obligations based on the Emergence.

According to the Plan, the Successor Company indemnified the Predecessor Company for historical tax reform.
On December 22, 2017,liabilities, including those related to the United States enactedEmergence and prior tax reform legislation (“contingencies. Tax Reform”)laws are complex and subject to various interpretations. Tax authorities often challenge certain of our tax positions and may challenge other historical tax positions that included a broad range of business tax provisions, including but not limitedare subject to a reduction inindemnification under the U.S. federalPlan. If these challenges are successful, they could adversely affect the Successor Company’s effective tax rate from 35% to 21% as well as provisions that limit and/or eliminate various deductions or credits. The legislation also causes U.S. expenses, such as interest and general administrative expenses, to be taxed and imposes a newcash tax on U.S. cross-border payments. Furthermore, the legislation includes a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and profits.

Many aspects of the Tax Reform are unclear, and although additional clarifying guidance is expected to be issued in the future (by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the U.S. Treasury Department or via a technical correction law change), it may not be clarified for some time. In addition, many U.S. states have not yet updated their laws to take into account the new federal legislation. Aspects of U.S. tax reform may lead foreign jurisdictions to respond by enacting additional tax legislation that is unfavorable to us. As a result, we have not yet been able to determine the full impact of the new laws on our results of operations and financial condition. It is possible that U.S. tax reform, or interpretations under it, could change and could have an adverse effect on us, and such effect could be material.

If we fail to establish and maintain an effective internal control environment, our ability to both timely and accurately report our financial results could be adversely affected.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires companies to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of their internal control over financial reporting. To comply with this statute, each year we are required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting, our management is required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal control over financial reporting.
The existence of one or more material weaknesses has previously resulted in, and could continue to result in, errors in our financial statements, and substantial costs and resources may be required to rectify these errors or other internal control deficiencies and may cause us to incur other costs, including potential legal expenses. If we cannot produce reliable financial reports, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and we may be unable to obtain additional financing to operate and expand our business and our business and financial condition could be harmed.
We have an established process to remediate identified control deficiencies timely and we continue to take appropriate actions to strengthen our internal control over financial reporting, but we cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, or any measures we may take in the future, will be sufficient to avoid potential future material weaknesses.
Risks Related to Our Chapter 11 Proceedings and Emergence
Our actual financial results may vary significantly from the projections that were filed with the Bankruptcy Court.
    In connection with our disclosure statement relating to the Plan (the “Disclosure Statement”), and the hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan, we prepared projected financial information to demonstrate to the Bankruptcy Court the feasibility of the Plan and our ability to continue operations upon Emergence. This projected financial information was prepared by, and is the responsibility of, our management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has not audited, reviewed, compiled or applied agreed-upon procedures with respect to the projected financial information and, accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP report included in this document relates to our financial statements. It does not extend to the projected financial information and should not be read to do so. Those projections were prepared solely for the purpose of the Bankruptcy Petitions and have not been, and will not be, updated on an ongoing basis. At the time they were prepared, the projections reflected numerous assumptions concerning our anticipated future performance and with respect to prevailing and anticipated market and economic conditions that were and remain beyond our control and that may not materialize. Projections are inherently subject to substantial and numerous uncertainties and to a wide variety of significant business, economic and competitive risks and the assumptions underlying the projections and/or valuation estimates may prove to be wrong in material respects. Actual results may vary significantly from those contemplated by the projections that were prepared in connection with the Disclosure Statement and the hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan.

Hexion Inc. | 27 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Our financial condition or results of operations will not be comparable to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in our historical financial statements.
    Following our emergence from bankruptcy, we have been operating our existing business under a new capital structure. In addition, we have been subject to the “fresh-start” accounting rules. As required by “fresh-start” accounting, assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value, based on values determined in connection with the implementation of the Plan. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations from and after the Emergence Date will not be comparable to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in our historical financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Risks Related to Our Parent’s Equity
Ownership of our Parent Companys common stock is concentrated in the hands of certain shareholders and their affiliates may have significant influence on corporate decisions

Hexion Holdings has a relatively small number of shareholders that collectively have a large concentration of ownership. This large concentration of ownership could collectively have significant influence over the outcome of actions requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. They collectively could be in a position to prevent or cause a change in control of the Company.

Additionally, any future change in control of the Company could result in events that would have an adverse effect on our business or financial condition. For example, a change in ownership control could place further limitations on our ability to the use our tax net operating losses in the future.
Actions of activist shareholders, and such activism could adversely impact our business.
We may be subject to proposals by shareholders urging us to take certain corporate actions. Responding to actions by activist shareholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupting our operations and diverting the attention of management and our employees. Such activities could also interfere with our ability to execute our business strategies. The perceived uncertainties as to our future direction caused by activist actions could affect the market price of our securities, result in the loss of potential business opportunities and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel, board members and business partners.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet our consolidated debt service payments.
During the first quarter of 2017, we issued $485 aggregate principal amount of 10.375% First Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “New First Lien Notes”) and $225 aggregate principal amount of 13.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “New Senior Secured Notes”). Upon the closing of these offerings, we satisfied and discharged our obligations under the 8.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 (the “Old Senior Secured Notes”). During the second quarter of 2017, we issued $75 aggregate principal amount of New First Lien Notes at an issue price of 100.5%. These notes mature in February 2022 and have substantially the same terms as the New First Lien Notes issued in February 2017. We used the net proceeds for general corporate purposes. In December 2016, we amended and restated our ABL Facility, with modifications to, among other things, permit the refinancing of the Old Senior Secured Notes. In connection with the issuance of the new notes in February 2017, certain lenders under the ABL Facility provided extended revolving facility commitments in an aggregate principal amount of $350 with a maturity date of December 5, 2021 (subject to early maturity triggers), the existing commitments were terminated and the size of the ABL facility was reduced from $400 to $350. Collectively, we refer to these transactions as the “2017 Refinancing Transactions.”
We have substantial consolidated indebtedness. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $3.7 billion of consolidated outstanding indebtedness, including payments due within the next twelve months and short-term borrowings. In addition, we had a $227 undrawn revolver under our ABL Facility, subject to a borrowing base, after giving effect to $42 of outstanding letters of credit. In 2018, our annualized cash interest expense is projected to be approximately $313 based on consolidated indebtedness and interest rates at December 31, 2017, of which $305 represents cash interest expense on fixed-rate obligations.
As of December 31, 2017, approximately $129, or 4%, of our borrowings were at variable interest rates and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same. Assuming our consolidated variable interest rate indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 2017 remains the same, an increase of 1% in the interest rates payable on our variable rate indebtedness would increase our annual estimated debt service requirements by approximately $1.
Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to make scheduled debt service payments depends on a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside of our control. We maintain normal commercial terms with our major vendors and customers. If certain of our commercial counterparties request changes to our terms, it could put additional pressure on our liquidity position and ourOur business may generate insufficient cash flows from operations to meet our debt service and other obligations, and currently anticipated cost savings, working capital reductions and operating improvements may not be realized on schedule, or at all. If we are unable to meet our expenses and debt service obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, sell assets or issue additional equity securities. We may be unable to refinance any of our indebtedness, sell assets or issue equity securities on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, which could cause us to default on our obligations and result in the acceleration of our debt obligations. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy our outstanding debt obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Availability under the ABL Facility is subject to a borrowing base based on a specified percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory and, with respect to the foreign loan parties, a specified percentage of eligible machinery, equipment and real property, subject to certain limitations. To the extent the borrowing base is lower than we expect, that could significantly impair our liquidity. In addition, if our fixed charge coverage ratio falls to less than 1.0 to 1.0, we will need to ensure that our availability under the ABL Facility is at least the greater of (x) $30 and (y) 10% of the lesser of (i) the borrowing base and (ii) the total ABL Facility commitments at such time.
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry.
As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $1.8 billionof consolidated outstanding indebtedness, including payments due within the next twelve months and short-term borrowings.
Our substantial consolidated indebtedness could have other important consequences, including but not limited to the following:
it may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our operations or business;
we are more highly leveraged than many of our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;
it may make us more vulnerable to downturns in our business or in the economy;
a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to the repayment of our indebtedness and will not be available for other purposes;
it may restrict us from making strategic acquisitions, introducing new technologies or exploiting business opportunities;
it may make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our existing indebtedness;
Hexion Inc. | 28 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
it may adversely affect terms under which suppliers provide material and services to us; and
it may limit our ability to borrow additional funds or dispose of assets; and
it may limit our ability to fully achieve possible cost savings from the Shared Services Agreement with MPM.assets.
There would be a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition if we were unable to service our indebtedness or obtain additional financing, as needed.
Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur significant additional indebtedness. This could intensify the risks described above and below.
We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Although the terms governing our indebtedness contain restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to numerous qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness we may incur in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Increasing our indebtedness could intensify the risks described above and below.
The terms governing our outstanding debt, including restrictive covenants, may adversely affect our operations.
The terms governing our outstanding debt contain, and any future indebtedness we incur would likely contain, numerous restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on our ability to, among other things:
incur or guarantee additional debt;
pay dividends and make other distributions to our shareholders;
create or incur certain liens;
make certain loans, acquisitions, capital expenditures or investments;
engage in sales of assets and subsidiary stock;
enter into sale/leaseback transactions;
enter into transactions with affiliates;
enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries; and
transfer all or substantially all of our assets or enter into merger or consolidation transactions.
In addition, the credit agreement governing our ABL Facility requires us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 at any time when theexcess availability is less than the greater of (x) $35$30 and (y) 12.5%10% of the lesser of (i) the borrowing base at such time and (ii) the total ABL Facility commitments at such time. The fixed charge coverage ratio under the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility is generally defined as the ratio of (a) AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA minus non-financed capital expenditures and cash taxes during such period to (b) debt service plus cash interest expense plus certain restricted payments, each measured for the four most recent quarters for which financial statements have been delivered. We may not be able to satisfy such ratio in future periods. If we anticipate we will be unable to meet such ratio, we expect not to allow our availability under the ABL Facility to fall below such levels.
A breach of our fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, if in effect, would result in an event of default under our ABL Facility. Pursuant to the terms of our ABL Facility, our direct parent company will have the right, but not the obligation, to cure such default through the purchase of additional equity in up to two of any four consecutive quarters and seven total during the term of the ABL Facility. If a breach of a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant is not cured or waived, or if any other event of default under the ABL Facility occurs, the lenders under such credit facility:
would not be required to lend any additional amounts to us;
could elect to declare all borrowings outstanding under the ABL Facility,Credit Facilities (see definition at Note 12 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, due and payable and could demand cash collateral for all letters of credit issued thereunder;
could apply all of our available cash that is subject to the cash sweep mechanism of the ABL FacilityCredit Facilities to repay these borrowings; and/or
could prevent us from making payments on our notes;
any or all of which could result in an event of default under our notes.


The ABL Facility provides for “springing control” over the cash in our deposit accounts constituting collateral for the ABL Facility, and such cash management arrangements includes a cash sweep at any time that availability under the ABL Facility is less than the greater of (x) $35$30 and (y) 12.5%10% of the lesser of (i) the borrowing base at such time and (ii) the total ABL Facility commitments at such time. Such cash sweep, if in effect, will cause substantially all our available cash to be applied to outstanding borrowings under our ABL Facility. If we satisfy the conditions to borrowings under the ABL Facility while any such cash sweep is in effect, we may be able to make additional borrowings under the ABL Facility to satisfy our working capital and other operational needs. If we do not satisfy the conditions to borrowing, we will not be permitted to make additional borrowings under our ABL Facility, and we willmay not have sufficient cash to satisfy our working capital and other operational needs.
In addition, the terms governing our indebtedness limit our ability to sell assets and also restrict the use
Hexion Inc. | 29 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of proceeds from that sale. We may be unable to sell assets quickly enough or for sufficient amounts to enable us to meet our obligations. Furthermore, a substantial portion of our assets is, and may continue to be, intangible assets. Therefore, it may be difficult for us to pay our consolidated debt obligations in the event of an acceleration of any of our consolidated indebtedness.Contents
Repayment of our debt, including required principal and interest payments, depends on cash flows generated by our subsidiaries, which may be subject to limitations beyond our control.
Our subsidiaries own a significant portion of our consolidated assets and conduct a significant portion of our consolidated operations. Repayment of our indebtedness depends, to a significant extent, on the generation of cash flows and the ability of our subsidiaries to make cash available to us by dividend, debt repayment or otherwise. Our subsidiaries may not be able to, or may not be permitted to, make distributions to enable us to make payments on our indebtedness. Each subsidiary is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from subsidiaries. While there are limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries to incur consensual restrictions on their ability to pay dividends or make intercompany payments, these limitations are subject to certain qualifications and exceptions. In the event that we are unable to receive distributions from our subsidiaries, we may be unable to make required principal and interest payments on our indebtedness.
A downgrade in our debt ratings could restrict our access to, and negatively impact the terms of, current or future financings or trade credit.
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) and Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) maintain credit ratings on us and certain of our debt. Each of these ratings is currently below investment grade. Any decision by these or other ratings agencies to downgrade such ratings in the future could restrict our access to, and negatively impact the terms of, current or future financings and trade credit extended by our suppliers of raw materials or other vendors.
ITEM 1B - UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

Hexion Inc. | 30 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ITEM 2 - PROPERTIES
Our headquarters are in Columbus, Ohio and we have executive offices in Rotterdam, Netherlands and Shanghai, China. Our major manufacturing facilities are primarily located in North America and Europe. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we operated 2221 domestic production and manufacturing facilities in 12states and 3023 foreign production and manufacturing facilities in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Finland, Germany, Italy, Korea, Malaysia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, the United Kingdom and Uruguay. As of December 31, 2020, we had 10 facilities that related to our Held for Sale Business.
The majority of our facilities are used for the production of thermosetting resins, and most of them manufacture more than one type of thermosetting resin, the nature of which varies by site. These facilities typically use batch technology, and range in size from small sites, with a limited number of reactors, to larger sites, with dozens of reactors. One exception to this is our plantplants in Deer Park, Texas and Pernis, Netherlands are the only continuous-process epoxy resins plantplants in the world, which provides us with a cost advantage over conventional technology.
In addition, we have the ability to internally produce key intermediate materials such as formaldehyde, BPA, ECH, and versatic acid. This backward integration provides us with cost advantages and facilitates our adequacy of supply. These facilities are usually co-located with downstream resin manufacturing facilities they serve. As these intermediate materials facilities are often much larger than a typical resins plant, we can capture the benefits of manufacturing efficiency and scale by selling material that we do not use internally to third parties.
We believe our production and manufacturing facilities are well maintained and effectively utilized and are adequate to operate our business. Following are our more significant production and manufacturing facilities and executive offices:
LocationNature of OwnershipReporting Segment
Argo, IL*OwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Barry, UK*w
OwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Brady, TXOwnedEpoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins
Deer Park, TX*OwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Duisburg-Meiderich, GermanyOwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Iserlohn-Letmathe, Germanyw
OwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Lakeland, FLOwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Louisville, KYw
OwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Moerdijk, Netherlands*OwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Onsan, South KoreaOwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Pernis, Netherlands*OwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Solbiate Olona, Italyw
OwnedEpoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating ResinsComposites
Zhenjiang, China*Curitiba, BrazilOwnedEpoxy, Phenolic and Coating ResinsAdhesives
Curitiba,Montenegro, BrazilOwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
Montenegro, BrazilOwnedForest Products Resins
Edmonton, AB, CanadaOwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
Fayetteville, NCOwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
Kitee, Finlandw
OwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
Luling, LA*OwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
Geismar, LA‡OwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
Gonzales, LAOwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
Hope, AROwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
Springfield, OROwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
St. Romuald, QC, CanadaOwnedForest Products ResinsAdhesives
Columbus, OH†LeasedCorporate and Other
Rotterdam, Netherlands†LeasedCorporate and Other
Shanghai, China†LeasedCorporate and Other

*
*    We own all of the assets at this location. The land is leased.
A portion of this location is leased.
Executive offices.


‡    A portion of this location is leased.
wFacilities that are held for sale as a part of discontinued operations. Other sites not listed above that are being held for sale as a part of discontinued operations are included in Note 4 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
†    Executive offices.

Hexion Inc. | 31 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ITEM 3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various product liability, commercial and employment litigation, personal injury, property damage and other legal proceedings in    In the ordinary course of business, we are, from time to time, subject to various legal proceedings, including matters involving local or federal environmental regulatory agencies, customer actions, that allege harm causedtax audits and unclaimed property audits by products the Company has allegedly made or used, containing silica, vinyl chloride monomerstates. We may enter into discussions regarding settlement of these and asbestos. The following claims represent materialother types of legal proceedings, outstanding that are notand may enter into settlement agreements, if we believe settlement is in the ordinary coursebest interest of business.
Environmental Damages to the Port of Paranagua, Brazil
On August 10, 2005, the Environmental Institute of Paraná (IAP), an environmental agency in the State of Paraná, provided Hexion Quimica Industria, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, with notice of an environmental assessment in the amount of 12 Brazilian reals. The assessment related to alleged environmental damages to the Paranagua Bay caused in November 2004 from an explosion on a shipping vessel carrying methanol purchased by theour Company. The investigations performed by the public authorities have not identified any actions of the Company that contributed to or caused the accident. The Company responded to the assessment by filing a request to have it cancelled and by obtaining an injunction precluding execution of the assessment pending adjudication of the issue. In November 2010, the Court denied the Company’s request to cancel the assessment and lifted the injunction that had been issued. The Company responded to the ruling by filing an appeal in the State of Paraná Court of Appeals. In March 2012, the Company was informed that the Court of Appeals had denied the Company’s appeal, and on June 4, 2012 the Company filed appeals to the Superior Court of Justice and the Supreme Court of Brazil. In September 2016, the Superior Court of Justice decided that strict liability does not apply to administrative fines issued by environmental agencies and reversed the decision of the State of Paraná Court of Appeals. The Superior Court of Justice remanded the case back to the Court of Appeals to determine if the IAP met its burden of proving negligence by the Company. In September 2017, the State of Paraná Court of Appeals decided that IAP did not prove that the Company was negligent and granted the Company’s request to annul the environmental assessment. IAP filed a motion for clarification regarding the Court of Appeals’ analysis of the case and the Company filed a motion for clarification regarding attorney fees.  After the pending motions are resolved, IAP will have 15 business days to file an appeal with the Superior Court of Justice. The Company doesWe do not believe that any such existing legal proceedings or settlements, individually or in the aggregate, will have a loss is probable. At December 31, 2017, the amountmaterial effect on our financial condition, results of the assessment, including tax, penalties, monetary correction and interest, is 44 Brazilian reals,operations or approximately $13.liquidity.
Louisville Air Pollution Control District Matter
The Louisville Air Pollution Control District (the “District”) assessed the Company penalties totaling $346,000 associated with alleged violations of the District’s air pollution laws and the Company’s air permit in 2016, 2017 and 2018.  The Company is actively cooperating with the District to resolve this matter. 
Other Litigation
For a discussion of certain other legal contingencies, refer to Note 814 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4 - MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
This item is not applicable to the registrant.



Hexion Inc. | 32 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
PART II
(dollars in millions, except per share data, or as otherwise noted)
ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
There is no established public trading market for our common stock. As of March 1, 2018, 82,556,8472021, 100 common shares were held by our direct parent, Hexion LLC.Intermediate.
We have no compensation plans that authorize issuing our common stock to employees or non-employees. In addition, there have been no sales or repurchases of our equity securities during the past fiscal year. However, we and our direct and indirect parent companies have in the pastParent Company, Hexion Holdings, has issued and may issue from time to time equity awards to our employees and directors that are denominated in or based upon the common unitsClass B Common Stock of our direct or ultimate parent to our employees and directors. As the awards were granted in exchange for service to us,Hexion Holdings. The impact of these awards are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. For a discussion of these equity plans, see Note 10 16.in Item 8 of Part II and Item 11 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Hexion Inc. | 33 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ITEM 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents our selected historical consolidated and combined financial data. The following information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the other financial information included elsewhere herein.
The consolidated balance sheet data at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 and the consolidated statement of operations data for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015for the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018 have been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein. The consolidated balance sheet data at December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 and the consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included herein.
SuccessorPredecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)201820172016
Statements of Operations:
Net sales (1)
$2,510 $1,323 $1,481 $3,137 $3,006 $2,932 
Cost of sales (1)(2)(3)
2,043 1,117 1,211 2,559 2,470 2,370 
Selling, general and administrative expense (1)(2)(3)
231 124 128 243 250 272 
Depreciation and amortization (3)(4)
191 93 43 98 97 115 
Gain on dispositions— — — (44)(2)(233)
Asset impairments16 — — 28 28 130 
Business realignment costs69 22 14 27 39 51 
Other operating expense, net24 16 17 37 27 14 
Operating (loss) income(64)(49)68 189 97 213 
Interest expense, net100 55 89 365 330 310 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt— — — — (48)
Reorganization items, net— — (2,970)— — — 
Other non-operating income, net (2)
(15)— (11)(12)(9)(15)
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax and earnings from unconsolidated entities(149)(104)2,960 (164)(227)(34)
Income tax expense (benefit)14 (10)201 31 15 31 
(Loss) income from continuing operations before earnings from unconsolidated entities(163)(94)2,759 (195)(242)(65)
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes
(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of taxes(161)(92)2,760 (191)(238)(61)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes(69)13528 23 
Net (loss) income(230)(88)2,895 (163)(234)(38)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest— (1)(1)— — 
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(230)$(89)$2,894 $(162)$(234)$(38)
Cash Flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities$131 $224 $(173)$(23)$(153)$(20)
Investing activities (5)
(126)(58)(42)(40)(110)219 
Financing activities(57)(38)212 81 174 (235)
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
Cash and cash equivalents$204 $254 $128 $115 $196 
Total assets(1)
4,002 4,146 1,961 2,097 2,055 
Total debt (6)
1,792 1,785 3,815 3,709 3,504 
Total liabilities(1)
3,179 3,071 4,875 4,839 4,594 
Total equity (deficit)823 1,075 (2,914)(2,742)(2,539)
(1)ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and ASC 842 Leases, were effective for the year ending December 31, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2019, respectively.
(2)“Cost of sales”, “Selling, general and administrative expense” and “Other non-operating income, net” have been adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the adoption of Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2017-07 (“ASU 2017-07”), which reclassified certain components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs from “Cost of sales” and “Selling, general and administrative expense” to “Other non-operating income, net” within our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(3)As a result of the application of fresh start accounting upon the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, the Company elected to change its income statement presentation for depreciation and amortization expense. All depreciation and amortization expense has been reclassified from “Cost of sales” and “Selling, general and administrative expense” to “Depreciation and amortization” for all periods presented. In addition, the Company will no longer present “Gross profit” as a subtotal caption.
Hexion Inc. | 34 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 (dollars in millions, except per share data)
Statements of Operations:         
Net sales$3,591
 $3,438
 $4,140
 $5,137
 $4,890
Cost of sales (1)
3,090
 3,038
 3,540
 4,576
 4,282
Gross profit501
 400
 600
 561
 608
Selling, general and administrative expense307
 328
 306
 399
 304
Gain on dispositions
 (240) 
 
 
Asset impairments13
 
 6
 5
 181
Business realignment costs52
 55
 16
 47
 21
Other operating expense (income), net17
 13
 12
 (8) 1
Operating income112
 244
 260
 118
 101
Interest expense, net329
 310
 326
 308
 303
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt3
 (48) (41) 
 6
Other non-operating (income) expense, net
 (7) (3) 32
 2
Loss from continuing operations before income tax and earnings from unconsolidated entities(220) (11) (22) (222) (210)
Income tax expense18
 38
 34
 22
 379
Loss from continuing operations before earnings from unconsolidated entities(238) (49) (56) (244) (589)
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes4
 11
 17
 20
 17
Net loss(234) (38) (39) (224) (572)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 (1) 1
 1
Net loss attributable to Hexion Inc.$(234) $(38) $(40) $(223) $(571)
Dividends declared per common share$
 $
 $
 $
 $0.01
Cash Flows (used in) provided by:         
Operating activities$(153) $(20) $213
 $(50) $80
Investing activities(109) 210
 (155) (233) (150)
Financing activities174
 (235) 24
 69
 52
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):         
Cash and cash equivalents$115
 $196
 $236
 $172
 $393
Short-term investments
 
 
 7
 7
Working capital (2)
135
 146
 283
 422
 570
Total assets2,097
 2,055
 2,382
 2,617
 2,804
Total long-term debt3,584
 3,397
 3,698
 3,678
 3,598
Total net debt (3)
3,635
 3,346
 3,593
 3,655
 3,374
Total liabilities4,839
 4,594
 4,859
 4,967
 4,877
Total deficit(2,742) (2,539) (2,477) (2,350) (2,073)
(1)Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 includes accelerated depreciation of $14 and $129, respectively, related primarily to facility rationalizations within the Epoxy, Phenolic and Coatings Resins segment.
(2)Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.
(3)Net debt is defined as long-term debt (excluding unamortized deferred financing fees) plus short-term debt less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.

(4)Depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2018, 2017 and 2016 include accelerated depreciation of$2, $4, $14, and $129 respectively, related to facility rationalizations. There was no accelerated depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2019.

(5)“Investing activities” within our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows has been adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the adoption of Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-18 (“ASU 2016-18”), which removed the change in restricted cash from “Investing activities” in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
(6)Total debt represents the sum of “Debt payable within one year” and “Long-term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 12 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Hexion Inc. | 35 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except share data)

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere herein. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs, and which involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
Overview and Outlook
We are a large participant in the specialty chemicals industry, one of the world’s largest producers of thermosetting resins, or thermosets, and a leading producer of adhesive and structural resins and coatings. Thermosets are a critical ingredient for most paints, coatings, glues and other adhesives produced for consumer or industrial uses. We provide a broad array of thermosets and associated technologies and have significant market positions in all of the key markets that we serve.
Our products are used in thousands of applications and are sold into diverse markets, such as forest products, architectural and industrial paints, packaging, consumer products and automotive coatings, as well as higher growth markets, such as wind energy and electrical composites. Major industry sectors that we serve include industrial/marine, construction, consumer/durable goods, automotive, wind energy, aviation, electronics, architectural, civil engineering, repair/remodeling and oil and gas drilling. Key drivers for our business include general economic and industrial conditions, including housing starts and auto build rates and active oil and gas drilling rigs.rates. In addition, due to the nature of our products and the markets we serve, competitor capacity constraints and the availability of similar products in the market may impact our results. As is true for many industries, our financial results are impacted by the effect on our customers of economic upturns or downturns, as well as by the impact on our own costs to produce, sell and deliver our products. Our customers use most of our products in their production processes. As a result, factors that impact their industries can and have significantly affected our results.
Through our worldwide network of strategically located production facilities, we serve more than 3,3002,900 customers in approximately 9086 countries. Our global customers include large companies in their respective industries, such as 3M, Akzo Nobel, BASF, Bayer, Dow,Norbord, Louisiana Pacific, Monsanto,Bayer, Owens Corning, PPG Industries, ValsparSherwin Williams, Sinoma, Aeolon and Weyerhaeuser.
Business Strategy
As a significant player in the specialty chemicals industry, we believe we have unique opportunities to strategically grow our business over the long term. Our products are well aligned with global mega-trends. We continue to develop new products withbelieve growth in many of our key applications is being driven by an emphasis on innovationincreasing need for lighter, stronger, higher performance and expanding our product solutions for our existing global customer base, while growing our businessesengineered materials in potential high growth regions in the world,many end markets such as Asia-Pacific, Latin Americaaerospace, automotive, energy, and the Middle East.construction. Population growth is expected to result in ever increasing demands for more sustainable solutions in energy, such as wind turbines, agriculture, low-emitting coatings, carbon efficient buildings through engineered structural wood, lightweighting composite applications, and improved fire, smoke and toxicity performance. Through these growth strategies, we strive to create shareholder value and generate solid operating cash flow.
Reportable SegmentsCOVID-19 Impact
In March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Around the world, local governments’ responses to COVID-19 continue to evolve, which has led to stay-at-home orders, social distancing guidelines and other preventative measures that have disrupted various industries in the global economy and the markets in which our products are manufactured, distributed and sold.
During this pandemic, we have implemented additional guidelines to further protect the health and safety of our employees as we continue to operate with our suppliers and customers. We have committed to maintaining a paramount focus on the safety of our employees while minimizing potential disruptions caused by COVID-19. For example, we are following all legislatively-mandated travel directives in the various countries where we operate, and we have also put additional travel restrictions in place for our associates designed to reduce the risk from COVID-19. Additionally, we are utilizing extended work from home options to protect our office associates, while adjusting our meeting protocols and processes at our manufacturing sites.
Our business segments arebusinesses have been designated by many governments as essential businesses and our operations have continued through December 31, 2020. While we have continued to operate during the pandemic, we did incur adverse financial impacts to our sales and profitability results during the year ended December 31, 2020 from COVID-19, primarily related to reduced volumes. The pandemic has impacted global economic conditions and lowered demand in many of the end use markets in which the Company operates such as automotive, aerospace, industrial products, oil and gas, construction and housing. The ultimate impact that COVID-19 will have on our future financial position, operating results and cash flows involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity and duration of COVID-19 and actions to contain the virus or treat its impact.


Hexion Inc. | 36 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Sale of Phenolic Specialty Resins Business
On September 27, 2020, we entered into a definitive agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) for the sale of our Phenolic Specialty Resins ("PSR"), Hexamine and European-based Forest Products Resins businesses (together with PSR, the “Held for Sale Business”) to Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC and Investindustrial (the “Buyers”) for a purchase price of approximately $425. The consideration consists of $335 in cash and certain assumed liabilities with the remainder in future contingent proceeds based on the performance of the Held for Sale Business. The sale is subject to customary closing conditions, including European Works Council consultation, and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2021.
As of December 31, 2020, we reclassified the assets and liabilities of our Held for Sale Business as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and reported the results of the operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 as “(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amounts for prior periods have similarly been retrospectively reclassified for all periods presented.
Unless otherwise noted, the tables and discussion below represent the Company’s continuing operations and excludes the Held for Sale Business.
Realignment of Reportable Segments in 2020
As part of the our continuing efforts to drive growth and greater operating efficiencies, in January 2020 we changed our reportable segments to align around our two growth platforms: Adhesives; and Coatings and Composites. These new segments consist of the following businesses:
Adhesives: these businesses focus on the global adhesives market. They include the Company’s global wood adhesives business, which now also includes the oilfield technologies group, including: forest products that we offerresin assets in North America, Latin America, Australia and New Zealand; and global formaldehyde.
Coatings and Composites: these businesses focus on the global coatings and composites market. They include our base and specialty epoxy resins and Versatic™ Acids and Derivatives businesses.
    We modified our internal reporting processes and systems to accommodate the new structure and the markets that we serve. Inchange to segment reporting is effective starting in the fourthfirst quarter of 2017, we added2020. Corporate and Other aswill continue to be a reportable segment.segment with this segment realignment in 2020.
At December 31, 2017, we had three reportable segments: Epoxy, PhenolicEmergence from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

    On April 1, 2019, the Company, Hexion Holdings LLC, Hexion LLC and Coating Resins; Forest Products Resins; and Corporate and Other. A summarycertain of the major productsCompany’s subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions (the “Bankruptcy Petitions”) for reorganization under Chapter 11 (“Chapter 11”) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Chapter 11 proceedings were jointly administered under the caption In re Hexion TopCo, LLC, No. 19-10684 (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). The Debtors continued to operate their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and items associatedin accordance with the Company’s reportable segments are as follows:applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court.

    On June 25, 2019, the Court entered an order (the “Confirmation Order”) confirming the Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Hexion Holdings LLC and its Debtor Affiliates under Chapter 11 (the “Plan”). On the morning of July 1, 2019, in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the Confirmation Order, the Plan became effective and the Debtors emerged from bankruptcy (the “Emergence”)
    
Epoxy, Phenolic    The Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on the Petition Date and Coating Resins: epoxy specialty resins, phenolic encapsulated substrates, versatic acidsas we previously disclosed, based on our financial condition and derivatives, basic epoxy resinsour projected operating results, the defaults under our debt agreements, and intermediates, phenolic specialty resinsthe risks and molding compoundsuncertainties surrounding our Chapter 11 proceedings, that there was substantial doubt as to the our ability to continue as a going concern as of the issuance of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. After our Emergence from Chapter 11 on July 1, 2019, based on our new capital structure, current liquidity position and projected operating results, we expect to continue as a going concern for the next twelve months. Refer to Note 5in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
Fresh Start Accounting
    On the Effective Date, in accordance with ASC 852, the Company applied fresh start accounting to its financial statements as (i) the holders of existing voting shares of the Company prior to its emergence received less than 50% of the voting shares of the Company outstanding following its emergence from bankruptcy and (ii) the reorganization value of the Company’s assets immediately prior to confirmation of the plan of reorganization was less than the post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. Fresh start accounting was applied to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of July 1, 2019, the date it emerged from bankruptcy, which resulted in a new basis of accounting and the Company became a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the Company allocated the reorganization value of the Company to its individual assets based on their estimated fair values. Reorganization value represents the fair value of the Company’s assets before considering liabilities. The excess reorganization value over the fair value of identified tangible and intangible assets was reported as goodwill. Refer to Note 6in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
Hexion Inc. | 37 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents

Financial Results Summary
Forest Products Resins: forest products resinsOur financial results for the period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and formaldehyde applications
for fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 are referred to as those of the “Predecessor” period. Our financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and for the period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 are referred to as those of the “Successor” period. Our results of operations as reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements for these periods are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which requires that we report on our results for the period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 separately.

    We do not believe that reviewing the results of these periods in isolation would be useful in identifying any trends in or reaching any conclusions regarding our overall operating performance. Management believes that the key performance metrics such as Net sales, Operating income and Segment EBITDA for the Successor period when combined with the Predecessor period provides more meaningful comparisons to other periods and are useful in identifying current business trends. Accordingly, in addition to presenting our results of operations as reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the tables and discussions below also present the combined results for the year ended December 31, 2019.     
Corporate and Other: primarily corporate general and administrative expenses that    The combined results (referenced as “Non-GAAP Combined” or “Combined”) for the year ended December 31, 2019, which we refer to herein as results for the “Year Ended December 31, 2019” represent the sum of the reported amounts for the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 combined with the Successor period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019. These Combined results are not allocatedconsidered to be prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and have not been prepared as pro forma results under applicable regulations. The Non-GAAP Combined operating results is presented for supplemental purposes only, may not reflect the other segments, suchactual results we would have achieved absent our emergence from bankruptcy, may not be indicative of future results and should not be viewed as shared servicea substitute for the financial results of the Predecessor period and administrative functions, foreign exchange gains and losses and legacy company costs.
Successor period presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.


20172020 Overview
Following are highlights from our results of continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
SuccessorPredecessorNon-GAAP Combined
(in millions)Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2019$ Change% Change
Statements of Operations:
Net sales$2,510 $1,323 $1,481 $2,804 $(294)(10)%
Operating (loss) income(64)(49)68 19 (83)(437)%
(Loss) income before income tax(149)(104)2,960 2,856 (3,005)(105)%
Net (loss) income from continuing operations(161)(92)2,760 2,668 (2,829)(106)%
Segment EBITDA:
Adhesives214 116 135 251 (37)(15)%
Coatings and Composites151 60 96 156 (5)(3)%
Corporate and Other(71)(37)(30)(67)(4)(6)%
Total$294 $139 $201 $340 $(46)(14)%
 2017 2016 $ Change % Change
Statements of Operations:       
Net sales$3,591
 $3,438
 $153
 4 %
Gross profit (1)
501
 400
 101
 25 %
Operating income112
 244
 (132) (54)%
Loss before income tax(220) (11) (209) (1,900)%
Net loss(234) (38) (196) (516)%
Segment EBITDA:       
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$174
 $258
 $(84) (33)%
Forest Products Resins257
 240
 17
 7 %
Corporate and Other(66) (65) (1) 2 %
Total$365
 $433
 $(68) (16)%
(1)Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 includes the negative impact of $14 and $129, respectively, of accelerated depreciation related primarily to facility rationalizations within our Epoxy, Phenolic and Coatings Resins segment.

Net Sales—Net sales in 20172020 were $3.6 billion,$2,510, a increasedecrease of 4%10% compared with $3.4 billion$2,804 in 2016. Excluding $1852019. Overall, COVID-19’s global impact on demand across various industries and markets in 2020 was the main driver of the decrease in net sales in 2016 from our divested Performance Adhesives, Powder Coatings, Additives & Acrylic Coatings and Monomers businesses (“PAC Business”), net sales increased by 10%. These increases were driven by pricing, which positivelysales. Pricing negatively impacted sales by $182 due largely due to raw material price increasesdecreases contractually passed through to customers across many of our businesses, partially offset byas well as unfavorable product mix and continued competitive pricing pressuresmarket conditions in our base epoxy resins and specialty business. Overall, volumes positivelyepoxy resins businesses. Volume negatively impacted net sales by $131 driven by strong market demand$70 primarily related to volume decreases in our North American and Latin America forest products resins businesses and our North American formaldehyde business as well as the additional capacity from our new formaldehyde plants. Additionally, volumes increased in our North American forest products resins business due to modest growth in the U.S. housing market and in our base epoxy resins business as it continues to recover from cyclical trough conditions. These increases were partially offset by volume decreases in our epoxy specialty business driven by an ongoing destocking of wind blades and lower installations. The impact of foreign exchange translation positively impacted net sales by $25, due to an overall strengthening of various foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar in 2017 compared to 2016.
Net Loss—Net loss in 2017 was $234, an increase of $196 as compared with a net loss of $38 in 2016. This increase was primarily driven by the absence of gains on the disposition of our PAC Business and HA-International, LLC (“HAI”) joint venture interest of $240 and gains on debt buybacks of $48 that positively impacted 2016. These increases to net loss were partially offset by increased gross margin of $101. Higher gross margin is primarily driven by a reduction in accelerated depreciation of $115 related to our Norco, LA facility closure that occurred in 2016, partially offset by the absence of gross margin from our divested PAC Business in 2017 results.
Segment EBITDA—In 2017, Segment EBITDA was $365, a decrease of 16% compared with $433 in 2016. Excluding Segment EBITDA of $23 in 2016 from our divested PAC Business and HAI joint venture, Segment EBITDA decreased by 11%. This decrease was primarily driven by volume decreases and margin compression in our specialty epoxy business discussed above, $15 of insurance recoveries received in 2016 in our versatic acids business that did not recur in 2017 and $6 ofCOVID-19’s negative impact related to the hurricanes that occurred in the U.S. during 2017.on global demand. These decreases were partially offset by volume increases in our North American formaldehydespecialty epoxy business discussed above,driven by strong global demand in wind energy. Foreign exchange translation negatively impacted net sales by $42 due to the weakening of the Brazilian real and the Chinese Yuan against the U.S. dollar in 2020 compared to 2019, partially offset by the overall strengthening of the euro against the U.S. dollar in 2020 compared to 2019.

Hexion Inc. | 38 | 2020 Form 10-K

Net Loss—Net loss from continuing operations in 2020 was $161, a decrease of $2,829 as wellcompared with a net income of $2,668 in 2019. This decrease was driven by a $2,970 reorganization gain in 2019 as continued cost efficiencies associated witha result of the restructuring of our new North American formaldehyde plants. Additionally, year over year improvementsdebt through our Chapter 11 proceedings. The decrease was also driven by a reduction in operating income of $83, primarily related to an increase of $55 in depreciation and amortization expense related to the step up of our fixed and intangible assets as a result of the application of fresh-start accounting, $16 of asset impairments in our oilfield and phenolic specialty resins businesses in the first quarter 2020, a $33 increase in business realignment costs driven by higher severance expenses related to current cost reduction actions and a decrease in gross profit due primarily to the impacts of COVID-19 on volumes in our businesses. These were partially offset by a reduction in interest expense of $44 as a result of the restructuring of our debt through our Chapter 11 proceedings and lower selling, general and administrative expense of $21 mainly driven by $29 of costs related to our Chapter 11 proceedings incurred in 2019 both prior to filing for bankruptcy and post-emergence and lower variable compensation expense in 2020.
Segment EBITDA—In 2020, Segment EBITDA from continuing operations was $294, a decrease of 14% compared with $340 in 2019. This decrease was primarily due to the impacts of COVID-19 on our businesses, most notably in our forest products resins and formaldehyde businesses, and continued competitive market conditions in our base epoxy resins businesses positivelybusiness. The decrease was also impacted by $18 of previously recorded deferred contract revenue that was accelerated as a result of the application of fresh start accounting in 2019, and temporary manufacturing disruptions at our Pernis site, which negatively impacted our 2020 Segment EBITDA as both of these businesses continue to recover from cyclical trough conditions.
by approximately $15. These Segment EBITDA decreases were partially offset by favorability in our specialty epoxy business driven by strong global demand in wind energy and strong market conditions in our versatic acids business.
Restructuring and Cost Reduction Programs—In November 2017,During 2020, we initiated new cost reduction programs that will be completed in the first half of 2018. We expect these programs to generate approximately $43 of incremental annual savings once fully implemented. During 2017, we have achieved $26$23 in cost savings related to our new and ongoing productivity and cost reduction programs. WithThese activities include certain in-process facility rationalizations and the additioncreation of a business service group within the new programs discussed above,Company to provide certain administrative functions for us going forward. Overall, we have a total of approximately $50$6 of in-process cost savings. We’ve taken the majority of the actions and the impact will be essentially realizedsavings related to these activities, which we expect to realize over the next 12 months.
Growth Initiatives—Our new North American formaldehyde plants, the last of which was completed in the first quarter of 2016, have provided us with additional capacity to support expected long-term growth in this business Initiativesand has helped drive improved results in 2017. In addition, weNew Product Development— We continue to focus on new product development to further strengthen our industry-leading research and development, technical services capabilities, and to strategically invest in our R&D footprint to increase opportunities for innovation and stimulate growth. These growth activities include the following:
Our new Adhesives product Armorbuilt™, which is designed to protect the critical utility pole infrastructure against wildfires. We expect incremental growth in 2021 from this product.
Extensive conversions were initiated at several major customers in 2020 for next generation OSB PF technology for board surface applications and additional applications are scheduled for 2021 as productivity gains and further reduction in resin usage, positions our products favorably compared to pMDI.
As an alternative technology, we have taken stepsalso developed BPA-free alternative coating technologies to improveaddress changing consumer preferences.
2021 Outlook
As we look forward to 2021, we anticipate continued economic recovery from the COVID-19 global pandemic including increased demand in several key end markets - housing, wind energy and automotive. While our analyticalbusinesses have been designated by many governments as essential businesses, which has allowed our operations to continue during the pandemic, we saw weak economic conditions develop in the first half of 2020, specifically within automotive and product development services forcertain industrial markets. In the second half of the year 2020, we saw sequential improvement in many of the industries in which our global grid, suchbusinesses operate and year-over-year Segment EBITDA improvement in the fourth quarter as the recently completed expansion ofoverall economy continued to recover from the global pandemic.
While we expect these current positive economic trends to continue into 2021, delays in COVID-19 vaccine distributions, increases in COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, deaths, restrictions on trade or government lock-downs could disrupt the current recovery and our technology center in Edmonton. Further, we continue to invest in environmentally friendly coatings technologies and capacity in response to recent volatile organic compounds regulation in China.


2017 Refinancing Transactions—In February 2017, we issued $485 aggregate principal amount of New First Lien Notes and $225 aggregate principal amount of New Senior Secured Notes. We used the net proceeds from these notes, together with cashexpectations. The ultimate impact that COVID-19 will have on our balance sheet, to redeem all of our outstanding Old Senior Secured Notes. In May 2017, we issued an additional $75 aggregate principal amount of New First Lien Notes. We also amendedoperating results will depend on the overall severity and restated our ABL Facility, which effectively extended the maturity dateduration of the facility from March 2018COVID-19 pandemic and actions to December 2021contain the virus or treat its impact.
Within our Coatings and reduced the existing commitments under the facility from $400 to $350.
2018 Outlook
During 2018, we expect strong market demand to continue to drive volume increases in our North American formaldehyde business. Additionally,Composites segment, we continue to expect improved demandour epoxy specialty business to benefit from a strong overall global wind energy market in 2021. Our Versatic AcidsTM and Derivatives business should continue to benefit from modest growth in architectural coatings. We also expect significant year over year improvement in our base epoxy business in 2021 due to anticipated improvements in market conditions.
Within our Adhesives segment, we anticipate improvement in Segment EBITDA within our North American forest products resins business due to ongoing growthin 2021 based on the latest expectations in U.S. housing starts, remodeling and remodeling. Further, we anticipate modest overall improvementongoing macroeconomic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. We also expect that continued economic recovery will positively impact our North American formaldehyde business in our Latin American forest products resins business due to recovery in the Brazilian economy.2021.

Hexion Inc. | 39 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
We also anticipate that our businesses will continue to benefit from the savings associated with our restructuring and cost reduction initiatives. In addition, we expect our base epoxy businesslower raw material costs to continue to improve in 2018 due topositively impact results across many of our restructuring initiatives and favorable market conditions. Additionally,businesses. Further, we expect demand in our epoxy specialty business to remain below historical levels due to softnessare in the China wind energy market, although demand is expectedprocess of implementing various efficiency initiatives, which include process improvement and other productivity projects. The benefits of our new capital structure and decreasing working capital will continue to stabilizehave a positive impact on free cash flow in the first half2021.
Lastly, our recent announcement of 2018. We also expect this business to benefit from significant improvements in market demand for waterborne coatings over the next few years, primarily in China. Lastly, we expect our phenolic resins business to benefit from cost reductions associated with our recently completed grid optimization efforts in Germany.
We expect raw material prices to stabilize into 2018, following large increases in 2017.
Portfolio Optimization Initiatives

In January 2018, we announced the sale of our Additives Technology Group business (“ATG”) businessPhenolic Specialty Resin, Hexamine and European-based Forest Products Resins businesses will further streamline our portfolio and improve our specialty product mix. We expect to MÜNZING CHEMIE GmbH. We received approximately $50 million in proceeds from the transaction, or approximately twelve times Segment EBITDA over the last twelve months. We will use the sale proceeds to further reduce our indebtedness as well as for general corporate purposes.

In addition, we have initiated a process for the potentialpurposes including investments in our business. The sale of a portion of our Epoxy, Phenolic and Coatings Resins segment. Should a sale occur, we expect that proceeds will be used to reduce our debt.
Tax Reform Implications
The 2017 U.S. tax reform reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate and included beneficial depreciation provisions, while other provisions could have an adverse effect on our results. Specifically, new provisions that cause U.S. expenses, such as interest and general administrative expenses, to be taxed and also imposes a tax on U.S. cross-border payments that could adversely impact our effective tax rate. We continue to evaluate the impacts as additional guidance becomes available. See Note 14 in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
Shared Services Agreement
In October 2010, we entered into a shared services agreement with MPM (which, from October 1, 2010 through October 24, 2014, was a subsidiary of Hexion Holdings), as amended in October 2014 (the “Shared Services Agreement”), pursuant to which we provide to MPM, and MPM provides to us, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, legal and procurement services. The Shared Services Agreement was renewed for one year starting in October 2017 and is subject to termination by eithercustomary closing conditions, including European Works Council consultation, and is expected to close in the Company or MPM, without cause, on not less than 30 days’ written notice, and expires in October 2018 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter; absent contrary notice from either party). The Shared Services Agreement establishes certain criteria upon which the costsfirst quarter of such services are allocated between us and MPM and requires that the Shared Services Steering Committee formed under the agreement meet no less than annually to evaluate and determine an equitable allocation percentage. The allocation percentage for both 2017 and 2016 was 56% for us and 44% for MPM. We periodically review the scope of services provided under this agreement.2021.

Matters Impacting Comparability of Results
Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the accountsChapter 11 Bankruptcy and Fresh Start Accounting Impacts
As a result of the Companyemerging from Chapter 11 and its majority-owned subsidiariesqualifying for the application of fresh-start accounting, at the Effective Date, our assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values which, in some cases, are significantly different than amounts included in our financial statements prior to the Effective Date. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations on and after the Effective Date are not directly comparable to our financial condition and results of operations prior to the Effective Date. The total amount of reorganization and fresh start adjustments, as well as incremental costs incurred related to our Bankruptcy Petitions incurred while we were in bankruptcy resulted in a total gain of $2,970 for our continuing operations which minority shareholders hold no substantive participating rights. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Dispositions of PAC Business and HAI Joint Venture Interest
As discussed above, during the second quarter of 2016, we completed the sales of both our PAC Business and our 50% interestis classified within “Reorganization items, net” in the HAI joint venture. Our results in 2017 exclude these divested businesses, while our results in 2015 and 2016 include net salesConsolidated Statements of $369 and $185, respectively, and Segment EBITDA of $50 and $30, respectively,Operations.
In addition, we incurred costs related to our Chapter 11 proceedings both prior to filing for bankruptcy and post-emergence, which are not classified within “Reorganization items, net” as these divested businesses. Additionally,costs were not incurred while in 2016 we recorded a gainbankruptcy. These costs were $29 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and are classified within “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of $240 on the disposition of these businesses.

Operations.
Raw Material Prices
Raw materials comprised approximately 70%75% of our cost of sales (excluding depreciation expense) in 2017.2020. The three largest raw materials used in our production processes are phenol, methanol and urea. These materials represented approximately 50% of our total raw material costs in 2017.2020. Fluctuations in energy costs, such as volatility in the price of crude oil and related petrochemical products, as well as the cost of natural gas, have caused volatility in our raw material costs and utility costs. In 2017,2020, the average price increase of methanol, urea and phenol methanol and urea increaseddecreased by approximately 15%, 46%7% and 4%11%, respectively, as compared to 2016.2019. In 2016,2019, the average prices of phenol remained flat, and the average pricesprice of methanol and urea decreased by approximately 30%22% and 27%5%, respectively, and the average price of phenol increased by 2%, as compared to 2015.2018. The impact of passing through raw material price changes to customers can result in significant variances in sales comparisons from year to year.
We expect long-term raw material cost volatility to continue because of price movements of key feedstocks. To help mitigate raw material volatility, we have purchase and sale contracts and commercial arrangements with many of our vendors and customers that contain periodic price adjustment mechanisms. Due to differences in timing of the pricing trigger points between our sales and purchase contracts, there is often a “lead-lag” impact. In many cases this “lead-lag” impact can negatively impact our margins in the short term in periods of rising raw material prices and positively impact them in the short term in periods of falling raw material prices.
Other Comprehensive Income
Our other comprehensive income is significantlyprimarily impacted by foreign currency translation and to a lesser degree by defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit adjustments.our derivative instruments designated as hedges. The impact of foreign currency translation is driven by the translation of assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries which are denominated in functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The primary assets and liabilities driving the adjustments are cash and cash equivalents; accounts receivable; inventory; property, plant and equipment; accounts payable; pension and other postretirement benefit obligations and certain intercompany loans payable and receivable. The primary currencies in which these assets and liabilities are denominated are the euro, Brazilian real, Chinese yuan, Canadian dollar and Australian dollar.
In 2019, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge interest rate variability caused by quarterly changes in cash flow due to associated changes in LIBOR under our Senior Secured Term Loan. This swap is designed as a cash flow hedge and changes in fair value are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss”.
The impact of defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit adjustments is primarily driven by unrecognized prior service cost related to our defined benefit and other non-pension postretirement benefit plans (“OPEB”), as well as the subsequent amortization of these amounts from accumulated other comprehensive income in periods following the initial recording of such amounts. Upon the application of fresh start accounting, on the Effective date, all prior unrecognized service cost within accumulated other comprehensive income related to our defined benefit pension and OPEB plans were reset in accordance with ASC 852 (Refer to Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

Hexion Inc. | 40 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Pension and OPEB MTM Adjustments
Under our accounting policy related to the recognition of gains and losses for pension and OPEB plans, upon the annual remeasurement of our pension and OPEB plans in the fourth quarter, or on an interim basis as triggering events warrant, we immediately recognize gains and losses as a mark-to-market (“MTM”) gain or loss through net income. The largest component of our pension and OPEB expense typically relates to these MTM adjustments. We recorded a MTM loss of $4 in 2020, a MTM loss of $5 for the Successor period July 2, 2019 to December 31, 2019 and a MTM gain of $13 in 2018. These MTM adjustments were largely driven by fluctuations in discount rates, which wereincreased in 2018 and decreased in both 2019 and 2020. In addition, a MTM loss of $44 was recorded upon Emergence, driven by reductions in discount rates, which was included within “Reorganization items, net” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019. These MTM adjustments are recognized in “Other non-operating (income) expense, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended, December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 as follows:Operations.
Hexion Inc. | 41 | 2020 Form 10-K
  Year Ended December 31,
MTM (Gain) Loss 2017 2016 2015
Cost of sales $2
 $19
 $(8)
Selling, general and administrative expense (6) 15
 (5)
Total $(4) $34
 $(13)

In 2017, favorable pension plan asset returns in 2017 resulted in an increase in unrealized gains
Table of $38, from an unrealized loss of $34 in 2016 to an unrealized gain of $4 in 2017. The change in unrealized gains decreased Cost of sales by $17 and Selling, general and administrative expense by $21.Contents
In 2016, an overall decrease in the discount rates used to calculate our pension and OPEB liabilities at December 31, 2016 resulted in a increase in unrealized losses of $47, from an unrealized gain of $13 in 2015 to an unrealized loss of $34 in 2016. The change in unrealized losses increased Cost of sales by $27 and Selling, general and administrative expense by $20.

Results of Operations
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
SuccessorPredecessorNon-GAAP CombinedPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)20192018
Net sales$2,510 $1,323 $1,481 $2,804 $3,137 
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)2,043 1,117 1,211 2,328 2,559 
Selling, general and administrative expense231 124 128 252 243 
Depreciation and amortization(1)
191 93 43 136 98 
Gain on dispositions— — — — (44)
Asset impairments16 — — — 28 
Business realignment costs69 22 14 36 27 
Other operating expense, net24 16 17 33 37 
Operating (loss) income(64)(49)68 19 189 
Operating (loss) income as a percentage of net sales(3)%(4)%%%%
Interest expense, net100 55 89 144 365 
Reorganization items, net— — (2,970)(2,970)— 
Other non-operating income, net(15)— (11)(11)(12)
Total non-operating expense (income)85 55 (2,892)(2,837)353 
(Loss) income before income tax and earnings from unconsolidated entities(149)(104)2,960 2,856 (164)
Income tax expense (benefit)14 (10)201 191 31 
(Loss) income before earnings from unconsolidated entities(163)(94)2,759 2,665 (195)
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes
(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of taxes(161)(92)2,760 2,668 (191)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes(69)135 139 28 
Net (loss) income(230)(88)2,895 2,807 (163)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest— (1)(1)(2)
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(230)$(89)$2,894 $2,805 $(162)
Other comprehensive loss$(26)$(1)$(8)$(9)$(10)
 Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017 2016 2015
Net sales$3,591
 $3,438
 $4,140
Cost of sales3,076
 2,909
 3,538
Accelerated depreciation14
 129
 2
Gross profit501
 400
 600
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales14% 12% 14%
Selling, general and administrative expense307
 328
 306
Gain on dispositions
 (240) 
Asset impairments13
 
 6
Business realignment costs52
 55
 16
Other operating expense, net17
 13
 12
Operating income112
 244
 260
Operating income as a percentage of net sales3% 7% 6%
Interest expense, net329
 310
 326
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt3
 (48) (41)
Other non-operating income, net
 (7) (3)
Total non-operating expense332
 255
 282
Loss before income tax and earnings from unconsolidated entities(220) (11) (22)
Income tax expense18
 38
 34
Loss before earnings from unconsolidated entities(238) (49) (56)
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes4
 11
 17
Net loss(234) (38) (39)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 (1)
Net loss attributable to Hexion Inc.$(234) $(38) $(40)
Other comprehensive income (loss)$31
 $(24) $(88)
(1)For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2018 accelerated depreciation of $2 and $4 has been included in “Depreciation and amortization.” There was no accelerated depreciation in the year ended December 31, 2019.
Net Sales
In 2017,2020, net sales increaseddecreased by $153,$294, or 4%10%, compared to 2016. Excluding $1852019. Overall, COVID-19’s global impact on demand across various industries and markets in 2020 was the main driver of the decrease in net sales from the disposition of our PAC Business in 2016, net sales increased by 10%.sales. Pricing positivelynegatively impacted net sales by $182 due largely due to raw material price increasesdecreases contractually passed through to customers across many of our businesses, partially offset byas well as unfavorable product mix and continued competitive pricing pressuresmarket conditions in our base epoxy resins and specialty business. Overall, volumes positivelyepoxy resins businesses. Volume negatively impacted net sales by $131 driven by strong market demand$70 primarily related to volume decreases in our North American and Latin America forest products resins businesses and our North American formaldehyde business as well asdriven by COVID-19’s negative impact on global demand. These decreases were partially offset by volume increases in our specialty epoxy business driven by strong global demand in wind energy. Foreign exchange translation negatively impacted net sales by $42 primarily due to the additional capacity from our new formaldehyde plants. Additionally, volumes increasedweakening of the Brazilian real and the Chinese yuan against the U.S. dollar in 2020 compared to 2019, and partially offset by the overall strengthening of the euro against the U.S. dollar 2020 compared to 2019.
In 2019, net sales decreased by $333, or 11%, compared to 2018. This decrease was primarily driven by volume decreases which negatively impacted net sales by $149 primarily related to volume decreases in our North American forest products resins business due to modest growth inweaker demand driven by customer mill closures and the U.S. housing marketimpact of competitive pricing pressures, and in our base epoxy resins business as it continuesdue to recover from cyclical trough conditions.an overall weakness in the market, primarily in the automotive and construction industries. These increasesdecreases were partially offset by volume decreasesincreased volumes in our epoxy specialty business drivendue to strong demand in China wind energy. Pricing negatively impacted sales by an ongoing destocking$102 due primarily to softer market conditions in our base epoxy resins business and raw material price decreases contractually passed through to customers across many of wind blades and lower installations. The impact of foreign exchangeour businesses. Foreign currency translation positivelynegatively impacted net sales by $25,$82 due to an overall strengtheningthe weakening of various foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar in 2017 compared to 2016.2019.
Hexion Inc. | 42 | 2020 Form 10-K

    Operating Income
In 2016, net sales2020, operating (loss) income decreased by $702, or 17%, compared$83 from operating income of $19 in 2019 to 2015. Pricing negatively impacted net salesan operating loss of $64 in 2020. This decrease was driven by $373 duean increase of $55 in depreciation and amortization expense related to raw material price decreases passed through to customers in mostthe step up of our businesses. The disposition of our PAC Business in the second quarter of 2016 negatively impacted net sales by $177. Volume decreases negatively impacted net sales by $82,fixed and were primarily driven by reduced volumes in our oilfield business, which were the result of lower natural gas and oil drilling activity caused by lower oil prices. Also contributing to the overall volume decrease were volume reductions in our Latin American forest products resins business due to the continued economic downturn in Brazil. These decreases were partially offset by higher volumes in our phenolic resins business, driven by the acquisition of the remaining 50% of our previous Chinese joint venture and increased demand within certain industrial markets in North America, as well as higher volumes in our epoxy specialty business, which were primarily driven by strong demand in the Chinese and European wind energy markets in the first half of 2016. In addition, foreign currency translation negatively impacted net sales by $70, primarilyintangible assets as a result of the strengtheningapplication of the U.S. dollar against the Brazilian real, Chinese yuan and eurofresh-start accounting, a $33 increase in 2016 comparedbusiness realignment costs driven by higher severance expenses related to 2015.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $101current cost reduction actions, an increase in 2017 compared to 2016, primarilyasset impairments of $16 due to an impairment charge in our oilfield and phenolic specialty resins businesses in the first quarter of 2020 and a decrease in accelerated depreciation of $115 driven by the closure of our Norco, LA facility in 2016 and the impact of the MTM adjustments on pension and OPEB liabilities (losses of $2 in 2017 and losses of $19 in 2016). Grossgross profit as a percentage of net sales increased by 2%,due primarily due to the impactimpacts of the accelerated depreciation discussed above, which had a negative impact of 3%COVID-19 on 2016 gross profit. This impact was partially offset by margin compression driven by competitive pricing pressures discussed above, as well as unfavorable raw material price inflation.

Gross profit decreased $200 in 2016 compared to 2015, primarily due to an increase in accelerated depreciation of $127 related to the rationalization of our Norco, LA facility and the indefinite idling of two manufacturing facilitiesvolumes in our oilfield business, as well as an increase of $27 relatedbusinesses. These reductions to MTM adjustments on pension and OPEB liabilities (losses of $19 in 2016 and gains of $8 in 2015). Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased by 2%, primarily due to the impact of the accelerated depreciation and MTM adjustments discussed above, which had a combined negative impact of 4%. These decreasesoperating income were partially offset by favorable raw material deflationa reduction in selling, general and raw material productivity initiatives.administrative expense driven by $29 of costs related to our Chapter 11 proceedings incurred in 2019 both prior to filing for bankruptcy and post-emergence and lower variable compensation expense in 2020.
Operating Income
OperatingIn 2019, operating income decreased by $132 in 2017$170 compared to 2016. This decrease was2018, primarily driven by margin reductions in our base epoxy resins business discussed above, the absence of gainsgain on the disposition of our PAC BusinessATG business of $44 that occurred in the first quarter 2018, $27 of non-cash expense related to the step up of finished goods inventory on July 1 as part of fresh start accounting that was expensed in the successor period upon the sale of the inventory, increases in depreciation and HAI joint venture interestamortization of $240 that positively impacted 2016$38 and a goodwill impairmentincreases in business realignment costs of $13 recognized$9 and in 2017selling, general and administrative expense of $9. The increase in depreciation and amortization is due to the step up of our fixed and intangible assets as a result of fresh start adjustments and the estimated fair valueincrease in business realignment costs is driven by higher severance expenses related to recent cost reduction actions. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense is driven by $29 of certain professional fees and other expenses incurred in the first, third and fourth quarters of 2019 related to our oilfield reporting unit being less thanChapter 11 proceedings, as well as the carrying valuetiming of its net assets.variable compensation costs, partially offset by savings related to our ongoing cost savings and productivity actions. These decreases to operating income were partially offset by the increasean asset impairment of $28 that occurred in gross profitthird quarter of $101, discussed above,2018 within our oilfield assets, as well as decreases in selling, general and administrativeour other operating expense of $21 and in business realignment costs of $3.$4. The decrease in selling, general and administrativeother operating expense wasis due primarily to lower compensationrealized and benefits expense driven by our recent cost savings and productivity actions and the impact of the MTM adjustments on pension and OPEB liabilities (gains of $6 in 2017 and losses of $15 in 2016), as well as the sale of our PAC Business in the second quarter of 2016, partially offset by $19 of insurance recoveries in 2016 related to the supplier disruption in our European versatic acids business. The decrease in business realignment costs in 2017 is largely attributable to costs in 2016 related to the Norco, LA facility closure that did not recur, primarily offset by costs associated with our 2017 cost reduction programs.unrealized foreign currency losses.
Operating income decreased by $16 in 2016 compared to 2015. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in gross profit of $200 discussed above. Also contributing to the decrease in operating income was a increase in business realignment costs of $39 and increases in selling, general and administrative expense of $22. The increase in business realignment costs was largely due to one-time closure expenses related to our Norco, LA facility rationalization, primarily consisting of charges related to the early termination of certain contracts for utilities, site services and raw materials. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was due primarily to the impact of the MTM adjustments on pension and OPEB liabilities (losses of $15 in 2016 and gains of $5 in 2015), costs related to the sale of our PAC Business and lower insurance recoveries in 2016 related to the supplier disruption in our European versatic acids business, partially offset by lower compensation and benefits expense driven by our recent cost savings and productivity actions. These negative impacts to operating income were partially offset by gains of $240 in the second quarter 2016 related to the sale of our PAC Business and our ownership interest in the HAI joint venture (see Note 12 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), as well as reductions of $6 in asset impairment charges.
Non-Operating Expense
In 2017,2020, total non-operating expense increased by $77 compared$2,922 from a non-operating income of $2,837 in 2019 to 2016,a non-operating loss of $85 due primarily due to $2,970 of reorganization gains on debt extinguishment of $48related to our Chapter 11 proceedings in 2016 that did not recur in 2017, an2019. This increase in interest expense of $19 driven by higher average debt levels and higher weighted average interest rates and a decrease of $7 in other non-operating income due to decreased realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction gains.
In 2016, total non-operating expense decreasedwas partially offset by $27 compared to 2015, primarily due toand a decrease in interest expense of $16 driven by lower average$44 as a result of our the restructuring of our debt levels, as well as an increase of $7through our Chapter 11 proceedings in gains on debt buyback transactions2019 and an increase of $4 in other non-operating income driven by a lower negative impact of MTM adjustment on pension and OPEB liabilities compared to 2019 and higher realized and unrealized foreign currency transactiongains.
In 2019, total non-operating income increased by $3,190 from a non-operating expense of $353 in 2018 to a non-operating income of $2,837, due to a $2,970 of reorganization items, net primarily related to reorganization and fresh start adjustments associated with our emergence from bankruptcy and a decrease in interest expense of $221 as a result of our the restructuring of our debt through our Chapter 11 proceedings. These items were partially offset by an decrease in other non-operating income of $1 driven by the negative impact of MTM adjustments on pension and OPEB liabilities, partially offset by an increase in realized and unrealized foreign currency gains.
Income Tax Expense
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation that included a broad range of business tax provisions, including but not limited to a reduction in the U.S. federal tax rate from 35% to 21% as well as provisions that limit or eliminate various deductions or credits. The legislation also causes U.S. expenses, such as interest and general administrative expenses, to be taxed and imposes a new tax on U.S. cross-border payments. Furthermore, the legislation includes a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and profits.
In response to the enactment of U.S. tax reform, the SEC issued guidance (referred to as “SAB 118”) to address the complexity in accounting for this new legislation. When the initial accounting for items under the new legislation is incomplete, the guidance allows companies to recognize provisional amounts when reasonable estimates can be made or to continue to apply the prior tax law if a reasonable estimate of the impact cannot be made. The SEC has provided up to a one-year window for companies to finalize the accounting for the impacts of this new legislation and we anticipate finalizing our accounting during 2018.
While our accounting for the new U.S. tax legislation is not complete, we have made reasonable estimates for certain provisions and recognized no net tax expense in our 2017 financial statements. We continue to evaluate the accounting impacts of the legislation, assemble and analyze the required information, and await additional guidance from the U.S. Treasury Department, the IRS or other standard-setting bodies. Additionally, we continue to analyze other information and regulatory guidance, and accordingly we may record additional provisional amounts or adjustments to provisional amounts in future periods. See Note 14 in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details on the impacts of U.S. tax reform.

In 2017, income tax expense decreased by $20 compared to 2016 primarily due to reduction in foreign earnings. In 2017, the Company recognized total income tax expense of $18 primarily related to income from certain foreign operations. The provisional income tax expense of $167 associated with revaluing our net U.S. deferred tax attributes to reflect the new U.S. corporate tax rate of 21%, as well as an additional $65 provisional income tax expense associated with the estimated transition tax was fully offset by net operating losses and the release of valuation allowance. Further, in 2017, losses in the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions had no impact on income tax expense due to the maintenance of a full valuation allowance. In 2016, the income tax expense related to the gain on dispositions was substantially reduced by net operating loss utilization which was offset by a decrease to the related valuation allowance.
In 2016, income tax expense increased by $4 compared to 2015. In 2016,During 2018, the Company recognized income tax expense of $38$31, primarily as a result of income from certain foreign operations. In the United States, disallowed interest expense resulted in current year taxable income which utilized a net operating loss carryforward. The disallowed interest expense carryforward of $283 generated a deferred tax asset. The decrease in the valuation allowance due to the net operating loss utilization was offset by an increase in the valuation allowance recorded on the interest expense carryforward deferred tax asset. The Company had a Global Intangible Low Tax Income (“GILTI”) inclusion of $21, which was fully offset by our net operating loss. This further reduced our valuation allowance.
    During the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, the Predecessor Company recorded income tax expense of $40 for reorganization adjustments, primarily consisting of tax expense of $50 for the gain recognized between fair value and tax basis (the gain in Predecessor Company will be substantially offset by the Predecessor Company’s tax attributes, including net operating losses and previously disallowed interest expense). A tax benefit of $10 was recorded for the removal of a valuation allowance for certain foreign jurisdictions. Pursuant to the Plan, the Successor Company is obligated to indemnify the Predecessor Company for any tax related liabilities. The Predecessor Company recorded income tax expense of $201 in the Predecessor period, primarily related to the increase in deferred tax liabilities resulting from fresh start accounting.
    The Predecessor Company’s U.S. net operating loss carryforward of $1,053 and certain state net operating loss carryforwards, along with other tax attributes, have been utilized or forfeited as a result of the taxable gain realized upon Emergence. Certain foreign net operating losses and other carryforwards of the Predecessor Company were forfeited upon Emergence.
Hexion Inc. | 43 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Upon the Emergence, the Successor Company applied fresh start accounting (see Note 6 for more information regarding fresh start accounting) and therefore the deferred tax assets and liabilities were adjusted based on the revised U.S. GAAP financial statements. As a result of the step-up in U.S. GAAP basis in the Successor Company’s foreign assets without a corresponding step-up in the tax basis of the foreign assets, the Successor Company’s deferred tax liability increased. An Internal Revenue Code §338(h)(10) election was made to treat the Emergence as an asset sale for U.S. income tax purposes. As a result, the Emergence was treated as a deemed sale of assets of the Predecessor Company while the Successor Company received a step-up in U.S. tax basis to fair value. The Successor Company elected bonus depreciation on the stepped-up U.S. eligible fixed assets. The Successor Company elected to amortize the stepped-up basis of intangibles over a 15-year period and the Successor Company’s depreciation and amortization expense generated a U.S. net operating loss for both the tax years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. The U.S. net operating loss will be carried forward indefinitely, but will be subject to an 80% limitation on U.S. taxable income starting in 2021.
    During the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Successor Company recognized income tax benefit of $10, primarily as a result of losses from certain foreign operations of which the deferred tax asset created is not offset by a valuation allowance. Losses in the United States created a deferred income tax benefitasset which was completely offset by an increase to the related valuation allowance.
Due to the newly enacted U.S. tax rate change, The Successor Company recognized a GILTI inclusion of $5, which was fully offset by our estimated balances as of December 31, 2017 represent timing differences, which may change when those estimates are finalized with the filing of our 2017 income tax return. At this time, we have not yet gathered, preparednet operating loss and analyzed the information in sufficient detail to complete the calculations necessary to finalize the amount of our transition tax. As we complete the analysis of accumulated foreign earnings and profits and related foreign taxes paid on an entity by entity basis and finalize the amounts held in cash or other specified assets, we will update our provisional estimate of the transition tax and assess the impact onfurther reduced our valuation allowance. As previously discussed above, the Successor Company elected bonus depreciation in 2019.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor Company recognized income tax expense of $14, primarily as a result of income from certain foreign operations in jurisdictions that do not currently have a NOL to offset income. Losses in the United States created a deferred tax asset which was completely offset by an increase to the valuation allowance. The Successor Company recognized a GILTI inclusion of $9, which was fully offset by our net operating loss and further reduced our valuation allowance.

Other Comprehensive Loss
In 2017, other comprehensive income of $31 relates to the $33 positive impact of2020, foreign currency translation primarilynegatively impacted other comprehensive loss by $8, due to thean overall strengtheningweakening of various foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar in 2020, and the impact of an unrealized loss of $18 on an interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge recorded to other comprehensive loss.
In 2019, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive loss by $11, due to an overall weakening of various foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar in 2019, partially offset by an unrealized gain of $2 on an interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge recorded to other comprehensive loss.
In 2018, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive loss by $8, primarily due to overall weakening of various foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar in 2018, as well as the impact of $2 of amortization of prior service costs on defined benefit pension and postretirement benefits.
In 2016, other comprehensive loss of $24 relates to the $23 negative impact of foreign currency translation, primarily driven by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Chinese yuan and the euro, and to $1 of amortization of prior service costs on defined benefit pension and postretirement benefits.
In 2015, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive income by $88, primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro, Brazilian real and Canadian dollar.
Results of Operations by Segment
Following are net sales and Segment EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) by reportable segment. Segment EBITDA is defined as EBITDA adjusted for certain non-cash items, other income and expenses and discontinued operations. Segment EBITDA is the primary performance measure used by our senior management, the chief operating decision-maker and the board of directors to evaluate operating results and allocate capital resources among segments. Segment EBITDA is also the profitability measure used to set management and executive incentive compensation goals. Segment EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net loss or other results reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
The combined results (referenced as “Non-GAAP Combined” or “Combined”) for the year ended December 31, 2019, which we refer to herein as results for the “Year Ended December 31, 2019” represent the sum of the reported amounts for the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 combined with the Successor period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019. These Combined results are not considered to be prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and have not been prepared as pro forma results under applicable regulations. The Non-GAAP Combined operating results is presented for supplemental purposes only, may not reflect the actual results we would have achieved absent our emergence from bankruptcy, may not be indicative of future results and should not be viewed as a substitute for the financial results of the Predecessor period and Successor period presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See Note 20 in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and below for reconciliation of net (loss) income to Segment EBITDA for the Successor and Predecessor.
Hexion Inc. | 44 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 Year Ended December 31,

2017 2016 2015
Net Sales (1):
     
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$2,052
 $2,094
 $2,589
Forest Products Resins1,539
 1,344
 1,551
Total$3,591
 $3,438
 $4,140
      
Segment EBITDA:

    
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$174
 $258
 $307
Forest Products Resins257
 240
 233
Corporate and Other(66) (65) (74)
Total$365
 $433
 $466
(1)Intersegment sales are not significant and, as such, are eliminated within the selling segment.

SuccessorPredecessorNon-GAAP CombinedPredecessor
(in millions)Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31,
Net Sales(1):
20192018
Adhesives$1,188 $693 $761 $1,454 $1,641 
Coatings and Composites1,322 630 720 1,350 1,496 
Total$2,510 $1,323 $1,481 $2,804 $3,137 
Segment EBITDA:
Adhesives$214 $116 $135 $251 $252 
Coatings and Composites151 60 96 156 $200 
Corporate and Other(71)(37)(30)(67)$(71)
Total$294 $139 $201 $340 $381 
2017(1)Intersegment sales are not significant and, as such, are eliminated within the selling segment.


Hexion Inc. | 45 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
2020 vs. 20162019 Segment Results
Following is an analysis of the percentage change in sales by segment from 20162019 to 2017:2020:
 VolumePrice/MixCurrency
Translation
Total
Adhesives(10)%(5)%(3)%(18)%
Coatings and Composites%(7)%— %(2)%
 Volume Price/Mix 
Currency
Translation
 Impact of Dispositions Total
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins3% 3% 1% (9)% (2)%
Forest Products Resins5% 9% 1%  % 15 %


Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating ResinsAdhesives
Net sales in 20172020 decreased by $42,$266, or 2%18%, when compared to 2016. The majority of the decrease is due to the disposition of our PAC Business in 2016, which2019. Volume negatively impacted net sales by $185. Higher volumes positively$141, driven by COVID-19’s global economic impact across various industries and markets primarily related to volume decreases in our North American and Latin America forest products resins businesses and our North American formaldehyde business. Volume declines primarily occurred in the second quarter 2020 and improved in the second half of 2020 as the global economy continued to recover from the global pandemic in many end markets. Pricing negatively impacted net sales by $68, primarily due to volume growth in our base epoxy resins and oilfield businesses, market driven volume increases in our phenolic resins business in North America and China and continued volume recovery in our European versatic acids business, partially offset by volume decreases in our epoxy specialty business largely driven by an ongoing destocking of wind blades and lower installations. Pricing positively impacted net sales by $66 due primarily to raw material price increases passed through to customers in most of our businesses, partially offset by competitive pricing pressures in our epoxy specialty business. Foreign exchange translation positively impacted net sales by $9, primarily due to the strengthening of the euro against the US dollar, partially offset by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Chinese yuan, in 2017 compared to 2016.
Segment EBITDA in 2017 decreased by $84 to $174 compared to 2016. The impact of the disposition of our PAC Business and HAI joint venture interest in the second quarter of 2016 contributed to $30 of this decrease. The remaining decrease was primarily driven by margin compression and volume decreases in our epoxy specialty business, as well as a Segment EBITDA impact of $15 related to insurance recoveries received in 2016 in our versatic acids business that did not recur in 2017 and $6 of negative impact related to the hurricanes that occurred in the U.S during the third quarter of 2017. These decreases were partially offset by improvements in our oilfield and base epoxy resins businesses, as both continue to recover from cyclical trough conditions.
Forest Products Resins
Net sales in 2017 increased by $195, or 15%, when compared to 2016. Pricing positively impacted net sales by $116,$80, which was primarily due to raw material price increasesdecreases contractually passed through to customers across many of our businesses. Foreign exchange translation negatively impacted net sales by $45, due largely to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Brazilian real in 2020 compared to 2019.
Segment EBITDA in 2020 decreased by $37 to $214 compared to 2019.This decrease was primarily driven by COVID-19 impacts on volumes in our forest products resins and formaldehyde businesses, as discussed above, as well as $18 of previously recorded deferred contract revenue that was accelerated as a result of the application of fresh start accounting in 2019.
Coatings and Composites
Net sales in 2020 decreased by $28, or 2%, compared to 2019. Pricing negatively impacted net sales by $102 due to raw material decreases contractually passed through to customers across many of our businesses, as well as unfavorable product mix and continued competitive market conditions in our base epoxy resins and specialty epoxy resins businesses. Volumes positively impacted net sales by $63, and were$71, which was primarily related to volume increases in our specialty epoxy business driven by continued strong marketglobal demand in our North America formaldehyde business combined with the additional capacity from our new formaldehyde plants. Additionally, volumes increased in our North American forest products resins business due to modest growth in the U.S. housing market. The impact of foreignwind energy. Foreign exchange translation positively impacted net sales by $16,$3, due primarily due to anthe overall strengthening of various foreign currenciesthe euro against the U.S. dollar and partially offset by the weakening of the Chinese yuan in 20172020 compared to 2016.2019.
Segment EBITDA in 2017 increased2020 decreased by $17$5 to $257$151 compared to 2016.This increase2019. The decrease was primarily due to increased volumesCOVID-19 impacts and continued competitive market conditions in our North American formaldehydebase epoxy resins business, discussed above, as well as cost efficiencies associated withtemporary manufacturing disruptions at our new North American formaldehyde plants.Pernis site, which negatively impacted our current year Segment EBITDA by approximately $15. These Segment EBITDA decreases were partially offset by favorability in our specialty epoxy business driven by strong global demand in wind energy and strong market conditions in our versatic acids business.
Corporate and Other
Corporate and Other is primarily corporate, general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the other segments, such as shared service and administrative functions, unallocated foreign exchange gains and losses and legacy company costs not allocated to continuingthe other segments. Corporate and Other charges increased by $1$4 to $66$71 compared to 2016,2019, due primarily to higher information technologythe termination of our Shared Services Agreement with MPM, project fees and unfavorable foreign exchange impacts. These increased costs and annual merit increases, largelywere partially offset by our ongoing cost savings efforts.reduction efforts, lower compensation costs and travel expenses.
20162019 vs. 20152018 Segment Results
The table below provides additional detail of the percentage change in sales by segment from 20152018 to 2016:2019:
 VolumePrice/MixCurrency
Translation
Total
Adhesives(5)%(4)%(2)%(11)%
Coatings and Composites(4)%(3)%(3)%(10)%
 Volume Price/Mix 
Currency
Translation
 Impact of Dispositions Total
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins(2)% (9)% (1)% (7)% (19)%
Forest Products Resins(1)% (10)% (2)%  % (13)%
Adhesives
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins

Net sales in 20162019 decreased by $495,$187, or 19%11%, when compared to 2015.2018. Volume negatively impacted net sales by $84, primarily related to volume decreases in our North American resins business due to weaker demand driven by customer mill closures and competitive pricing pressures. Pricing negatively impacted net sales by $221 due primarily to raw material price decreases passed through to customers in most of our businesses. The disposition of our PAC Business in the second quarter of 2016 negatively impacted net sales by $177. Lower volumes negatively impacted net sales by $64, which were primarily driven by continued decreases in volumes within our oilfield business, as well as volume decreases in our base epoxy business due to increased competition. These decreases were partially offset by higher volumes in our phenolic resins business due to the acquisition of the remaining 50% of our previous Chinese joint venture and increased demand within certain industrial markets in North America, as well as overall higher volumes in our epoxy specialty business, which were primarily driven by strong demand in the Chinese and European wind energy markets in the first half of 2016. Foreign exchange translation negatively impacted net sales by $33, primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Chinese yuan and the euro in 2016 compared to 2015.
Segment EBITDA in 2016 decreased by $49 to $258 compared to 2015. The impact of the disposition of our PAC Business and HAI joint venture interest in the second quarter of 2016 contributed to $23 of this decrease. The remaining decrease was primarily driven by the volume declines in our oilfield and base epoxy businesses discussed above. These decreases were partially offset by the growth in our epoxy specialty business discussed above, combined with margin expansion in our versatic acids business and cost reductions related to the rationalization at our Norco, LA manufacturing facility.


Forest Products Resins
Net sales in 2016 decreased by $207, or 13%, when compared to 2015. Pricing negatively impacted net sales by $152, which was primarily due to raw material price decreases contractually passed through to customers across many of our businesses. Lower volumes negatively impacted net sales by $18, and were primarily driven by weaker demand in our Latin American forest products resins business as a result of the continued economic downturn in Brazil. These decreases were partially offset by volume increases in certain industrial markets within our European forest products business. Foreign exchange translation negatively impacted net sales by $37, primarily$39, due largely to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Brazilian real, Canadian dollar and the eurovarious currencies in 20162019 compared to 2015.2018.

Segment EBITDA in 2016 increased2019 decreased by $7$1 to $240$251 compared to 2015.2018. This increase was primarily due to increased volumes and cost efficiencies associated withdriven by the volume decreases in our new North American formaldehyde plants,resins business discussed above, largely offset by $18 of previously recorded deferred contract revenue that was accelerated during the period as well as increased raw material productivity.a result of the application of fresh start accounting.
Hexion Inc. | 46 | 2020 Form 10-K

Coatings and Composites

Net sales in 2019 decreased by $146, or 10%, compared to 2018. Volumes negatively impacted net sales by $65, which was primarily related to volume decreases in our base epoxy resins and versatic acids businesses driven by overall weakness in the market, primarily in the automotive and construction industries. These increasesdecreases were partially offset by increased volumes in our epoxy specialty business due to stronger demand in China wind energy. Pricing negatively impacted net sales by $38 primarily due to softer market conditions in our base epoxy resins business as compared to 2018. Foreign exchange translation negatively impacted net sales by $43, due primarily to the volumestrengthening of the U.S. dollar against various foreign currencies in 2019 compared to 2018.
Segment EBITDA in 2019 decreased by $44 to $156 compared to 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by the margin reductions in our Latin American forest productsbase epoxy resins business due to softer market conditions discussed above.
Corporate and Other
Corporate and Other is primarily corporate, general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the other segments, such as shared service and administrative functions, unallocated foreign exchange gains and losses and legacy company costs not allocated to continuingthe other segments. Corporate and Other charges decreased by $9$4 to $65$67 compared to 2015,2018, due primarily to lowerour ongoing cost reduction efforts, the timing of variable compensation costs and benefits expense driven by our recent cost savings actions.favorable foreign exchange impacts.

Reconciliation of Net Loss to Segment EBITDA:
 SuccessorPredecessorNon-GAAP CombinedPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31,
 20192018
Reconciliation:
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(230)$(89)$2,894 $2,805 $(162)
Add: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest— (1)
Less: Net (loss) income from discontinued operations(69)135 139 28 
Net (loss) income from continued operations(161)(92)2,760 2,668 (191)
Income tax expense (benefit)14 (10)201 191 31 
Interest expense, net100 55 89 144 365 
Depreciation and amortization (1)
191 93 43 136 98 
EBITDA144 46 3,093 $3,139 303 
Adjustments to arrive at Segment EBITDA:— 
Asset impairments and write-downs$16 $— $— $— $32 
Business realignment costs (2)
69 22 14 36 27 
Realized and unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)— (7)(3)28 
Gain on dispositions— — — — (44)
Unrealized losses (gains) on pension and OPEB plan liabilities— (13)
Transaction costs (3)
11 26 37 13 
Reorganization items, net (4)
— — (2,943)(2,943)— 
Non-cash impact of inventory step-up(5)
— 27 (27)— — 
Accelerated deferred revenue (6)
— — 18 18 — 
Other non-cash items (7)
43 10 19 14 
Other (8)
12 14 18 32 21 
Total adjustments150 93 (2,892)(2,799)78 
Segment EBITDA$294 $139 $201 $340 $381 
Segment EBITDA:
Adhesives214 116 135 $251 252 
Coatings and Composites151 60 96 156 200 
Corporate and Other(71)(37)(30)(67)(71)
Total$294 $139 $201 $340 $381 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net loss$(234) $(38) $(39)
Income tax expense18
 38
 34
Interest expense, net329
 310
 326
Depreciation and amortization115
 131
 137
Accelerated depreciation14
 129
 2
EBITDA$242
 $570
 $460
Items not included in Segment EBITDA:     
Asset impairments$13
 $
 $6
Business realignment costs52
 55
 16
Realized and unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)3
 (11) 10
Gain on dispositions
 (240) 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt3
 (48) (41)
Unrealized (gains) losses on pension and OPEB plan liabilities(4) 34
 (13)
Other56
 73
 28
Total adjustments123
 (137) 6
Segment EBITDA$365
 $433
 $466
      
Segment EBITDA:     
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$174
 $258
 $307
Forest Products Resins257
 240
 233
Corporate and Other(66) (65) (74)
Total$365
 $433
 $466
Items Not Included in Segment EBITDA
Not(1)For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2018 accelerated depreciation of $2 and $4, respectively, has been included in Segment EBITDA are certain non-cash items“Depreciation and other incomeamortization.” There was no accelerated depreciation during the Successor period July 2, 2019 to December 31, 2019 or the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019.
Hexion Inc. | 47 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
(2)Business realignment costs for the Successor and expenses. Predecessor periods below included:
SuccessorPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Severance costs$16 $$$
In-process facility rationalizations11 11 
Contractual costs from exited business— — — 
Business services implementation22 — — — 
Legacy environmental reserves
Other
(3)For 2017 and 2016, these other items primarilythe year ended December 31, 2020, transaction costs included certain professional fees related to strategic projectsprojects. For the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 and expenses from retention programs. For 2015, these other itemsthe Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, transaction costs primarily included expenses from retention programs,$6 and $23, respectively, of certain professional fees and other expenses related to strategic projects and management fees, partially offset bythe Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings.
(4)Represents incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings after the date of filing, gains on settlement of liabilities under the disposalPlan and the net impact of assets and a gain on a step acquisition.fresh start accounting adjustments. The amounts excludes the “Non-cash impact of inventory step-up” discussed below.
Business realignment costs for 2017 primarily included costs

(5)    Represents $27 of non-cash expense related to in-process cost reduction programsthe step up of finished goods inventory on July 1 as part of fresh start accounting that was expensed
in the successor period upon the sale of the inventory.
(6)    For the Predecessor period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, $18 of deferred revenue was accelerated on July 1 as part of Fresh Start accounting.
(7)    Other non-cash items for the Successor and certain in-processPredecessor periods presented below included:
SuccessorPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
Fixed asset write-offs$13 $$$
Stock-based compensation costs17 — — 
Long-term retention programs(2)
One-time capitalized variance impact of inventory fresh start step-up— (4)— — 
Other— 

(8)    Other for Successor and recently completed facility rationalizations. Business realignment costs for 2016 primarily included costs related to certain in-process cost reduction programs. Business realignment costs for 2015 primarily included costs related to certain in-process cost reduction programs.Predecessor periods presented below included:
SuccessorPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
Legacy and other non-recurring items$$$$
IT outage (recoveries) costs, net(4)— — 
Financing fees and other14 

Hexion Inc. | 48 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources

2021 Outlook
We believe we are a highly leveraged company. Our primary sources offavorably positioned to fund our ongoing liquidity arerequirements for the foreseeable future through cash flows generated from operations, and availabilityas well as available borrowings under our ABL Facility. Our primary liquidity requirements are interest, workingWe have the operational and financial flexibility to make strategic capital investments, leverage our leadership positions with both our customers and capital expenditures.
At December 31, 2017, we had $3,709 of outstanding debtsuppliers, optimize our portfolio and $346 in liquidity consisting of the following:
$97 of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents (of which $84 is maintained in foreign jurisdictions);
$227 of borrowings available under our ABL Facility ($350 borrowing base less $81 of outstanding borrowings and $42 of outstanding letters of credit); and
$22 of time drafts and borrowings available under credit facilities at certain international subsidiaries.
Our net working capital (defined as accounts receivable and inventories less accounts payable) at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $373 and $309, respectively. A summary of the components of our net working capital as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
 December 31, 2017 % of LTM Net Sales December 31, 2016 
% of LTM Net Sales (1)
Accounts receivable$462
 13 % $390

12 %
Inventories313
 9 % 287

9 %
Accounts payable(402) (12)% (368)
(11)%
Net working capital(2)
$373
 10 % $309
 10 %
(1)The percentage of LTM Net Sales at December 31, 2016 exclude net sales related to our PAC Business, which was sold on June 30, 2016.
(2)The components of net working capital at December 31, 2017 exclude $6 of net working capital related to the ATG business. The assets and liabilities of ATG are classified as held for sale in the December 31, 2017 Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The increase in net working capital of $64 from December 31, 2016 was the result of a increase of $72 in accounts receivable and $26 in inventory. The increase in accounts receivable and inventory were primarily the result of increased volumes in 2017 compared to 2016 due to market conditions as well as raw material price inflation. These increases to net working capital were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $34, largely related to raw material price inflation and the timing of vendor payments. To minimizedrive new growth programs. As the impact of net working capital changesthe COVID-19 pandemic on cash flows,the global economy and our operations evolves, we will continue to review inventory safety stock levels, focus on receivable collections by offering incentives to customers to encourage early payment or acceleration of receipts through the sale of receivables and negotiate with vendors to contractually extend payment terms whenever possible.
We periodically borrow from the ABL Facility to supportassess our short-term liquidity requirements, particularly around payments for interest obligations and when net working capital requirements increase in response to seasonality of our volumes. As of December 31, 2017, there were $81 of outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility.
2017 Refinancing Transactions
In February 2017, we issued $485 aggregate principal amount of New First Lien Notes and $225 aggregate principal amount of New Senior Secured Notes. Upon the closing of these offerings, we used the net proceeds from these offerings, together with cash on our balance sheet, to redeem all of our outstanding 8.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 (the “Old Senior Secured Notes”), which occurred in March 2017.
In May 2017, we issued an additional $75 aggregate principal amount of New First Lien Notes at an issue price of 100.5%. These notes mature on February 1, 2022 and have substantially the same terms as the New First Lien Notes issued in February 2017. We used the net proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes.    
In December 2016, we amended and restated the ABL Facility, with modifications to, among other things, permit the refinancing of the Old Senior Secured Notes. In connection with the issuance of the new notes in February 2017, certain lenders under the ABL Facility provided extended revolving facility commitments in an aggregate principal amount of $350 with a maturity date of December 5, 2021 (subject to early maturity triggers), the existing commitments were terminated and the size of the ABL Facility was reduced from $400 to $350.
2018 Outlookneeds.
The following factors will impact 20182021 cash flows:
Sales of Assets: During the third quarter of 2020, we entered in a Purchase Agreement to sell our Phenolic Specialty Resins, Hexamine and European-based Forest Products Resins businesses. We expect to complete the transaction in the first quarter of 2021. We plan to use the proceeds from the transaction to reinvest in our businesses and reduce the absolute amount of our debt. We will continue to explore options to optimize our portfolio.
Interest and Income Taxes:Taxes: We expect cash outflows in 20182021 related to interest payments on our debt of approximately $315$85 to $95 and income tax payments between $15 and $25.
$20 to $30.
Capital Spending:Spending: Capital spending in 20182021 is expected to be between $80$120 and $90, a decrease$140, an increase from 20172020 due to our recent divestiturescommitment to future investments to productivity and restructuring activities at certain facilities.
growth projects in our businesses, as well as the expected timing of plant turnarounds.
Working Capital:We anticipate working capital to increase modestly during 2018,2021, as compared to 2017,2020, based on expected increased volumes.volumes as key end markets continue to recover from COVID-19. During the year, we expect an increase in the first half and a decrease in the second half, consistent with historical trends.

Restructuring Activities: Activities: We expect that the 20182021 cost savings associated with our recently announced cost reduction programs, as well as our other ongoingin-process facility rationalizations and recently completed restructuring and cost reduction activities,the creation of a business service group within the Company to provide certain administrative functions for us going forward will exceed the one-time cash costs in 2018 associated with these programs and have a net positive impact on our liquidity.
SalesOur short-term cash needs are expected to include funding operations as currently planned and we believe that we will be able to meet our liquidity needs over the next 12 months based on our current projections of Assets: We regularly review our portfoliocash flow from operations and are currently exploring potential divestitures. While there is no guaranteeborrowing availability under financing arrangements.
At December 31, 2020, we had $1,792 of a transaction, it could include a specific business unit or combinationoutstanding debt and $561 in liquidity consisting of several businesses. As mentioned above, we completed the salefollowing:
$200 of our ATG business in January 2018 for cash proceeds of approximately $50. Also, we continue to evaluate additional sales of miscellaneous or idle assets, which would further increase our liquidity.
We plan to fund these outflows with availableunrestricted cash and cash equivalents cash from operations and, if necessary, through(of which $113 is maintained in foreign jurisdictions);
$297 of borrowings available borrowings under our ABL Facility. Following a usage Facility ($350 borrowing base less $53of cashoutstanding letters of credit; there were no outstanding borrowings); and
$64 of time drafts and borrowings available under credit facilities at certain international subsidiaries.
Our net working capital (defined as accounts receivable and inventories less accounts payable) from operating activities in 2017, we expect significant improvement in our 2018 operating cash flows driven by anticipated improvement in business performance,continuing operations at December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $257 and $320, respectively. A summary of the impactcomponents of our cost reduction programs and lower restructuring spend. Based on our liquidity positionnet working capital as of December 31, 2017,2020 and projections2019 is as follows:
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020% of LTM Net SalesDecember 31, 2019
% of LTM Net Sales (1)
Accounts receivable$331 13 %$316 11 %
Inventories265 11 %293 10 %
Accounts payable(339)(14)%(289)(10)%
Net working capital (1)
$257 10 %$320 11 %
(1)    Management believes that this non-GAAP measure is useful supplemental information. This non-GAAP measure should be considered by the reader in addition to but not instead of, operating cash flowsthe financial statements prepared in 2018,accordance with GAAP.
The decrease in net working capital of $63 from December 31, 2019 was driven by a decrease in inventory of $28, primarily the result of lower raw material costs in 2020, and an increase in accounts payable of $50. The increase in accounts payable was largely related to improved vendor terms and the timing of vendor payments. The increase in accounts payable and decrease in inventories were partially offset by an increase of $15 in accounts receivable driven by overall higher volumes in the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. Based on our new capital structure, we believeexpect continued structural improvement in our vendor terms going forward. Consistent with the historical seasonality of our businesses, we haveexpect an increase in net working capital in the abilityfirst quarter of 2021 compared to continue as a going concern for the next twelve months.fourth quarter 2020.

Hexion Inc. | 49 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Sources and Uses of Cash
Following are highlights from our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31:continuing operations:
SuccessorPredecessorNon-GAAP CombinedPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019December 31,
2017 2016 201520192018
Sources (uses) of cash:     Sources (uses) of cash:
Operating activities$(153) $(20) $213
Operating activities$116 $174 $(163)$11 $(63)
Investing activities(109) 210
 (155)Investing activities(105)(47)(40)(87)(31)
Financing activities174
 (235) 24
Financing activities(57)(38)212 174 81 
Effect of exchange rates on cash flow6
 (4) (10)Effect of exchange rates on cash flow— (5)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents$(82) $(49) $72
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalentsNet increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$(44)$90 $$99 $(18)
Operating Activities
In 2017,2020, operating activities used $153provided $116 of cash. Net loss of $234$161 included $151 of net non-cash expense items, consisting ofnon cash adjustments for depreciation and amortization of $115, non-cash asset impairments and accelerated depreciation$191, deferred tax expense of $27, amortization of deferred financing fees $16,$9, loss on debt extinguishmentsale of $3 andassets of $9, unrealized foreign currency losses of $3, partially offset by $4 of unrealized gains related to the remeasurement of our pension and OPEB liabilities gain on sale of assets$4, non cash asset impairments of $1$16 and a deferred tax benefitnon-cash stock based compensation expense of $3.$17, partially offset by unrealized foreign currency gains of $3 and other non-cash income adjustments of $1. Net working capital used $41,generated $76, which was largely driven by an increase in accounts payable due to improved vendor terms and the timing of vendor payments offset by increases in accounts receivable and inventories due primarily to volume increases related to market conditions as well as raw material price inflation.higher year-over-year volumes in the fourth quarter of 2020. Changes in other assets and liabilities and income taxes payable used $29$41 due to the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, employee retention programs, restructuring reserves, incentive compensation, pension plan contributions and taxes.
In 2016,2019, operating activities used $20provided $11 of cash. Net lossincome of $38$2,668 included $34$3,156 of net non-cash income items of which $240 related to gains on the HAI and PAC dispositions, $52 was forour reorganization, unrealized foreign currency gains of $8 and $48 related to gains on debt extinguishments. These items wereother non-cash income adjustments of $3, partially offset by $131 of depreciation and amortization $129 of accelerated depreciation, $34$136, deferred tax expense of $131, deferred financing fees of $136, non-cash impact of inventory step-up of $27, loss on sale of assets of $7, unrealized losses related to the remeasurement of our pension and OPEB liabilities of $5, and $2 related to deferred tax expense. Workingnon cash stock based compensation expense of $8. Net working capital provided $18,remained flat, which was largely driven by decreasesa decrease in accounts payable due to the timing of vendor payments partially offset by smaller decreases in accounts receivable and inventory due to sales volume decreases,lower volumes and lower raw material prices and increased efficiency in accounts receivable collections.prices. Changes in other assets and liabilities and income taxes payable provided $34 due to the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, restructuring costs, employee retention programs, pension plan contributions and taxes.
In 2015, operating activities provided $213 of cash. Net loss of $39 included $97 of net non-cash expense items, of which $137 was for depreciation and amortization, $12 related to unrealized foreign currency losses, $8 was for non-cash asset impairments and accelerated depreciation and $7 related to deferred tax expense. These expense items were partially offset by a $41 gain on extinguishment of debt, $13 of unrealized gains related to the remeasurement of our pension and OPEB liabilities, a $5 gain on step acquisition and a $4 gain on sale of assets. Working capital provided $135, which was driven by decreases in accounts receivable and inventory due to sales volume decreases, lower raw material prices and increased efficiency in accounts receivable collections, which were partially offset by decreases in accounts payable, driven by volume decreases, lower raw material prices and the timing of vendor payments. Changes in other assets and liabilities and income taxes payable provided $20$60 due to the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, employee retention programs, restructuring reserves, incentive compensation, pension plan contributions and taxes.

In 2018, operating activities used $63 of cash. Net loss of $191 included $135 of net non-cash expense items, consisting of depreciation and amortization of $98, non-cash asset impairments and accelerated depreciation of $28, amortization of deferred financing fees of $49, deferred tax expense of $12, loss on sale of assets of $6 and unrealized foreign currency losses of $2, partially offset by the gain on the sale of ATG of $44 and unrealized gains related to the remeasurement of our pension and OPEB liabilities of $13. Net working capital used $24, which was largely driven by increases in inventories due to raw material price inflation and decreases in accounts receivable due to lower volumes. Changes in other assets and liabilities and income taxes payable provided $17 due to the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, employee retention programs, restructuring reserves, incentive compensation, pension plan contributions and taxes.
Investing Activities
In 2017,2020, investing activities used $109,$105, primarily driven by capital expenditures of $118 (including capitalized interest),$108, partially offset by proceeds from sale of assets of $3.
In 2019, investing activities used $87, primarily driven by capital expenditures of $88, partially offset by proceeds from sale of assets of $1.
In 2018, investing activities used $31, primarily driven by capital expenditures of $81, partially offset by net proceeds from the ATG disposition of $49 and proceeds from sale of assets of $8 and an increase of $1 in restricted cash.
In 2016, investing activities provided $210, primarily driven by net cash proceeds of $356 related to the HAI and PAC dispositions and cash received on the HAI buyer’s note, as well as $5 in proceeds from the sale of other assets. These items were partially offset by capital expenditures (including capitalized interest) of $141 and increase of $9 in restricted cash.
In 2015, investing activities used $155. We spent $179 for capital expenditures (including capitalized interest), which primarily related to plant expansions, improvements and maintenance related capital expenditures. Additionally, we spent $7, net of cash received, on the step acquisition of a joint venture. The sale of certain assets and investments provided cash of $23, and the decrease in restricted cash provided $8.$1.
Financing Activities
In 2017,2020, financing activities provided $57. Net short-term debt repayments were $7 and net long-term debt borrowings were $37. The Company distributed a $13 affiliate loan to its Parent for share repurchases, which was subsequently settled with a return of capital.
In 2019, financing activities provided $174. Net short-term debt borrowingsrepayments were $21$28 and net long-term debt borrowings were $178.$40, proceeds received from the rights offering were $300 and we also paid $138 of financing fees. Our long-term debt borrowings primarily consisted of $81the proceeds from our new Senior Secured Term loans and Senior Notes, offset by the debt repayments made as part of the Plan.
Hexion Inc. | 50 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
In 2018, financing activities provided $81. Net short-term debt borrowings were $10 and net long-term debt borrowings were $72. Our long-term debt borrowings primarily consisted of $137 in borrowings under our Predecessor ABL Facility, the refinancing of our Old Senior Secured Notes in February 2017, an additional $75 aggregate principal amount of New First Lien Notes issued in May 2017 and $43 related to the sale-leaseback financing of certain equipment at plants within our Forest Products Resins segment that occurred in the second half of 2017. We also paid $25 of financing fees related to these debt transactions.
In 2016, financing activities used $235. Net short-term debt repayments were $22 and net long-term debt repayments were $212. Our long-term debt repayments primarily consisted of $240 used to repurchase a portion of our Old Senior Secured Notes on the open market.Facility. We also paid $1 of financing fees.
In 2015, financing activities provided $24. Net short-term debt repayments were $3, and net long term borrowings were $38, which primarily consisted of proceeds from the issuance of an aggregate principal amount of $315 of 10.00% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (“10.00% First Lien Notes”), which was partially offset by the redemption or repayment of approximately $40 of our outstanding Sinking Fund Debentures and all amounts outstanding on the ABL Facility at the time of the issuance. Additionally, we used $160 to repurchase a portion of our Old Senior Secured Notes on the open market. We also paid $11 of financing fees related to these debt transactions.

There are certain restrictions on the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to the parentHexion Inc. in the form of cash dividends, loans or otherwise, which primarily arise as a result of certain foreign government regulations or as a result of restrictions within certain subsidiaries’ financing agreements limiting such transfers to the amounts of available earnings and profits or otherwise limit the amount of dividends that can be distributed. In either case, we have alternative methods to obtain cash from these subsidiaries in the form of intercompany loans and/or returns of capital in such instances where payment of dividends is limited to the extent of earnings and profits.


Outstanding Debt
Following is a summary of our cash and cash equivalents and outstanding debt at December 31, 20172020 and 2019:
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Cash and cash equivalents$204 $254 
Senior Secured Credit Facility:
ABL Facility— — 
Senior Secured Term Loan - USD due 2026 (includes $6 and $7 of unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively)708 715 
Senior Secured Term Loan - EUR due 2026 (includes $4 of unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2020 and 2019)515 473 
Senior Notes:
7.875% Senior Notes due 2027450 450 
Other Borrowings:
Australia Facility due 2021 at 4.0% and 3.9% at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively30 31 
Brazilian bank loans at 10.2% and 9.2% at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively24 41 
Lease obligations(1)
56 64 
Other at 3.9% and 5.0% at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively11 
Total$1,792 $1,785 
(1)    Lease obligations include finance leases and sale leaseback financing arrangements.
(2)    The foreign exchange translation impact of the Company’s foreign currency denominated debt instruments was an increase of $46 and a decrease of $10 as of December 31, 2016:
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
Cash and cash equivalents$115
 $196
    
Debt:   
ABL Facility$81
 $
Senior Secured Notes:   
6.625% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (includes $2 and $3 of unamortized debt premium at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)1,552
 1,553
10.00% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020315
 315
10.375% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2022560
 
8.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 (includes $1 of unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2016)
 706
13.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2022225
 
9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020574
 574
Debentures:   
9.2% debentures due 202174
 74
7.875% debentures due 2023189
 189
Other Borrowings:   
Australia Term Loan Facility due 201850
 51
Brazilian bank loans43
 40
Lease obligations49
 9
Other38
 31
Unamortized debt issuance costs(41) (38)
Total$3,709
 $3,504
We have $1.9 billion of First Priority Senior Secured Notes maturing in April 2020 and $0.6 billion of Second Priority Notes maturing in November 2020. Additionally, if 91 days prior to the scheduled maturity of these notes, more than $50 aggregate principal amount is outstanding, our ABL Facility, which matures in December 2021, will accelerate and become immediately due and payable.2019, respectively.

We regularly review our portfolio for optimization through potential divestitures and are currently exploring potential divestitures.bolt-on acquisitions or mergers. While there is no guarantee of a transaction,any future transactions, it could include a specific business unit or combination of several businesses. We expect that a portion of the proceeds from aany future divestiture transaction or transactions upon completion would be used to help reduce the absolute amount of our debt.
Further, depending upon market, pricing and other conditions, including the current state of the high yield bond market, as well as cash balances and available liquidity, we or our affiliates, may seek to acquire notes or other indebtedness of the Company through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers, redemption or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices as we or our affiliates may determine (or as may be provided for in the indentures governing the notes), for cash or other consideration.
Covenant Compliance
Credit Facilities and Senior Notes
The instruments that govern our indebtedness contain, among other provisions, restrictive covenants (and incurrence tests in certain cases) regarding indebtedness, dividends and distributions, mergers and acquisitions, asset sales, affiliate transactions, capital expenditures and, in the case of our ABL Facility, the maintenance of a financial ratio (depending on certain conditions). Payment of borrowings under the ABL Facility and our notes may be accelerated if there is an event of default as determined under the governing debt instrument. Events of default under the credit agreement governing our ABL Facility includes the failure to pay principal and interest when due, a material breach of representations or warranties, most covenant defaults, events of bankruptcy, and a change of control.control, and most covenant defaults. Events of default under the indentures governing our notes include the failure to pay principal and interest, a failure to comply with covenants, subject to a 30-day grace period in certain instances, and certain events of bankruptcy.
The indenturesindenture that governgoverns our 6.625% First-Priority7.875% Senior Secured Notes 10.00% First Lien Notes, New First Lien Notes, New Senior Secured Notes and 9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notesdue 2027 (the “Secured Indentures”“Indenture”) contain an Adjustedcontains a Pro Forma EBITDA to Fixed Charges ratio incurrence test which may restrict our ability to take certain actions such as incurring additional debt or making acquisitions if we are unable to meet this ratio (measured on a last twelve months, or LTM, basis) of at least 2.0:1. The AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA to Fixed Charges Ratio under the Secured IndenturesIndenture is generally defined as the ratio of (a) AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA to (b) net interest expense excluding the amortization or write-off of deferred financing costs, each measured on an LTM basis. See below for our AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA to Fixed Charges Ratio calculation.

Hexion Inc. | 51 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Our ABL Facility, which is subject to a borrowing base, does not have any financial maintenance covenant other than a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 that would only apply if our availability under the ABL Facility at any time is less than the greater of (a) $35$30 and (b) 12.5%10.0% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time. The fixed charge coverage ratio under the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility is generally defined as the ratio of (a) AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA minus non-financed capital expenditures and cash taxes to (b) debt service plus cash interest expense plus certain restricted payments, each measured for the four most recent quarters for which financial statements have been delivered. At December 31, 2017, our availability under the ABL Facility exceeded such levels; therefore, the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio did not apply. As

Hexion Inc. | 52 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants that govern the ABL Facility. We believe that a default under the ABL Facility is not reasonably likely to occur in the foreseeable future.Contents
Reconciliation of Last Twelve Months Net Loss to AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA
AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA is defined as EBITDA adjusted for certain non-cash and certain non-recurring items and other adjustments calculated on a pro-forma basis, including the expected future cost savings from business optimization programs or other programs and the expected future impact of acquisitions, in each case as determined under the governing debt instrument. As we are highly leveraged, weWe believe that including the supplemental adjustments that are made to calculate AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA provides additional information to investors about our ability to comply with our financial covenants and to obtain additional debt in the future. AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA and Fixed Charges are not defined terms under U.S. GAAP. AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA is not a measure of financial condition, liquidity or profitability, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP or operating cash flows determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Additionally, EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as it does not take into account certain items such as interest and principal payments on our indebtedness, depreciation and amortization expense (because we use capital assets, depreciation and amortization expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue), working capital needs, tax payments (because the payment of taxes is part of our operations, it is a necessary element of our costs and ability to operate), non-recurring expenses and capital expenditures. Fixed Charges under the Secured IndenturesIndenture should not be considered an alternative to interest expense.
The following table reconciles Netnet loss to EBITDA and AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA from continuing operations for the twelve month period and calculates the ratio of AdjustedPro Forma EBITDA to Fixed Charges as calculated under certain of our indenturesIndenture for the period presented:
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net loss$(234)
Interest expense, net329
Income tax expense18
Depreciation and amortization115
Accelerated depreciation14
EBITDA242
Adjustments to EBITDA: 
Asset impairments13
Loss on extinguishment of debt3
Business realignment costs (1)
52
Realized and unrealized foreign currency losses3
Unrealized gains on pension and OPEB plan liabilities (2)
(4)
Other (3)
65
Cost reduction programs savings (4)
50
Adjusted EBITDA$424
Pro forma fixed charges (5)
$313
Ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges (6)
1.35
December 31, 2020
LTM Period
Net loss$(230)
Net loss from discontinued operations(69)
Net loss from continuing operations(161)
Income tax expense14 
Interest expense, net100 
(1)Depreciation and amortization191 
EBITDA$144 
Adjustments to arrive at Pro Forma EBITDA:
Asset impairments16 
Primarily representsBusiness realignment costs related to headcount reduction expenses(1)
69 
Realized and plant rationalization costs related to in-process and recently completed cost reduction programs, termination costs and other costs associated with business realignments.unrealized foreign currency gains— 
(2)Represents non-cash gains from
Unrealized loss on pension and postretirement benefitOPEB plan liability remeasurements.liabilities (2)
Transaction costs (3)
(3)
Primarily includes certain professional fees related to strategic projects, retention program costs, business optimization expenses, management fees and expenses related to legacy liabilities.Other non-cash items (4)
43 
(4)
Other (5)
Represents pro forma impact of in-process cost reduction programs savings. Cost reduction program savings represent the unrealized headcount reduction savings and plant rationalization savings related to cost reduction programs and other unrealized savings associated with the Company’s business realignments activities, and represent our estimate of the unrealized savings from such initiatives that would have been realized had the related actions been completed at the beginning of the period presented. The savings are calculated based on actual costs of exiting headcount and elimination or reduction of site costs.
16 
(5)
Cost reduction programs savings (6)
Reflects pro forma interest expense based on interest rates at December 31, 2017, as if the 2017 Refinancing Transactions had taken place at the beginning of the period.

(6)Pro Forma EBITDAThe Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, among other actions, is restricted under the indentures governing certain notes, unless the Company has an Adjusted$304 
Pro forma fixed charges (7)
$84 
Ratio of Pro Forma EBITDA to Fixed Charges ratio of 2.0 to 1.0. As of December 31, 2017, we did not satisfy this test. As a result, we are subject to restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness or to make investments; however, there are exceptions to these restrictions, including exceptions that permit indebtedness under the ABL Facility (available borrowings of which were $227 at December 31, 2017).(8)
3.62 
(1)Primarily represents costs related to certain in-process cost reduction activities, including severance costs of $16, $11 related to certain in-process facility rationalizations, $8 of contractual costs for exited businesses, $9 for future environmental clean-up of closed facilities and one-time implementation and transition costs associated with the creation of a business services group within the Company of $22.
(2)Represents non-cash losses from pension and postretirement benefit plan liability remeasurements.
(3)Represents certain professional fees related to strategic projects.
(4)Primarily include expenses for retention programs of $9, fixed asset disposals of $13, and share-based compensation costs of $17.
(5)Primarily includes legacy and other non-recurring expenses of $8, financing fees and other expenses of $8 and business optimization expense of $4, offset by IT outage recoveries of $4.
(6)Represents pro forma impact of in-process cost reduction programs savings. Cost reduction program savings represent the unrealized headcount reduction savings and plant rationalization savings related to cost reduction programs and other unrealized savings associated with the Company’s business realignments activities, and represent our estimate of the unrealized savings from such initiatives that would have been realized had the related actions been completed at the beginning of the period presented. The savings are calculated based on actual costs of exiting headcount and elimination or reduction of site costs. We expect the savings to be realized within the next 12 months.
(7)Reflects pro forma interest expense based on interest rates at December 31, 2020 and expected 2021 debt pay downs.
(8)The Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, among other actions, is limited under our Senior Secured Term Loans and Senior Notes, unless the Company has a Pro Forma EBITDA to Fixed Charges ratio of at least 2.0 to 1.0.

Hexion Inc. | 53 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents our contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2017.2020. Our contractual cash obligations consist of legal commitments at December 31, 20172020 that require us to make fixed or determinable cash payments, regardless of the contractual requirements of the specific vendor to provide us with future goods or services. This table does not include information about most of our recurring purchases of materials used in our production; our raw material purchase contracts do not meet this definition since they generally do not require fixed or minimum quantities. Contracts with cancellation clauses are not included, unless a cancellation would result in a major disruption to our business. For example, we have contracts for information technology support that are cancelable,cancellable, but this support is essential to the operation of our business and administrative functions; therefore, amounts payable under these contracts are included. These contractual obligations are grouped in the same manner as they are classified in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in order to provide a better understanding of the nature of the obligations.
 Payments Due By Year
Contractual Obligations202120222023202420252026 and beyondTotal
Operating activities:
Purchase obligations (1)
$190 $134 $94 $50 $49 $253 $770 
Interest on fixed rate debt obligations53 52 51 51 50 71 328 
Interest on variable rate debt obligations (2)
13 12 12 11 11 20 79 
Operating lease obligations23 16 11 58 126 
Funding of pension and other postretirement obligations (3)
43 45 46 46 46 — 226 
Financing activities:
Long-term debt, including current maturities79 33 16 1,650 1,793 
Finance lease obligations (4)
Total$403 $293 $231 $175 $174 $2,055 $3,331 
  Payments Due By Year
Contractual Obligations 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 and beyond Total
Operating activities:              
Purchase obligations (1)
 $199
 $97
 $97
 $10
 $9
 $68
 $480
Interest on fixed rate debt obligations 304
 303
 233
 110
 61
 8
 1,019
Interest on variable rate debt obligations (2)
 5
 1
 
 
 
 
 6
Operating lease obligations 24
 19
 13
 9
 5
 13
 83
Funding of pension and other postretirement obligations (3)
 30
 30
 30
 30
 31
 
 151
Financing activities:              
Long-term debt, including current maturities 120
 5
 2,524
 76
 785
 189
 3,699
Capital lease obligations 11
 10
 14
 10
 22
 1
 68
Total $693
 $465
 $2,911
 $245
 $913
 $279
 $5,506
(1)Purchase obligations are comprised of the fixed or minimum amounts of goods and/or services under long-term contracts and assumes that certain contracts are terminated in accordance with their terms after giving the requisite notice which is generally two to three years for most of these contracts; however, under certain circumstances, some of these minimum commitment term periods could be further reduced which would significantly decrease these contractual obligations.
(1)Purchase obligations are comprised of the fixed or minimum amounts of goods and/or services under long-term contracts and assumes that certain contracts are terminated in accordance with their terms after giving the requisite notice which is generally two to three years for most of these contracts; however, under certain circumstances, some of these minimum commitment term periods could be further reduced which would significantly decrease these contractual obligations.
(2)Based on applicable interest rates in effect at December 31, 2017.
(3)
Pension and other postretirement contributions have been included in the above table for the next five years. These amounts include estimated benefit payments to be made for unfunded foreign defined benefit pension plans as well as estimated contributions to our funded defined benefit plans. The assumptions used by our actuaries in calculating these projections includes a weighted average annual return on pension assets of approximately 4% for the years 2018 – 2022 and the continuation of current law and plan provisions. These estimated payments may vary based on the actual return on our plan assets or changes in current law or plan provisions. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on our pension and postretirement obligations.
(2)Based on applicable interest rates in effect at December 31, 2020.
(3)Pension and other postretirement contributions have been included in the above table for the next five years. These amounts include estimated contributions to our funded defined benefit plans as well as estimated benefit payments to be made for unfunded foreign defined benefit pension plans. The assumptions used by our actuaries in calculating these projections includes a weighted average annual return on pension assets of approximately 3.5% for the years 2021 – 2025 and the continuation of current law and plan provisions. These estimated payments may vary based on the actual return on our plan assets or changes in current law or plan provisions. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on our pension and postretirement obligations.
(4)Sale leaseback financing arrangements are included in “Long-term debt, including current maturities” because they are not considered leases under Topic 842.
The table above excludes payments for income taxes and environmental obligations since, at this time, we cannot determine either the timing or the amounts of all payments beyond 2017.2020. At December 31, 2017,2020, we recorded unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $129.$194. We estimate that we will pay between $15$20 and $25$30 in 20182021 for U.S. Federal, state and internationalforeign income taxes. We expect non-capital environmental expenditures for 20182021 through 20222026 totaling $17.$10. See Notes 814 and 1417 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on 10-K for more information on these obligations.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2017.2020.

Hexion Inc. | 54 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Estimates
In preparing our financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, we have to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts of reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Some of these accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management to select the appropriate assumptions to determine these estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty; therefore, actual results may differ significantly from estimated results. We base these judgments on our historical experience, advice from experienced consultants, forecasts and other available information, as appropriate. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our most critical accounting policies, which reflect significant management estimates and judgment to determine amounts in our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, are as follows:
Fresh Start Accounting
    On the Effective Date, in accordance with ASC 852, the Company applied fresh start accounting to its financial statements as (i) the holders of existing voting shares of the Company prior to its emergence received less than 50% of the voting shares of the Company outstanding following its emergence from bankruptcy and (ii) the reorganization value of the Company’s assets immediately prior to confirmation of the plan of reorganization was less than the post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. Fresh start accounting was applied to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of July 1, 2019, the date it emerged from bankruptcy, which resulted in a new basis of accounting and the Company became a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the Company allocated the reorganization value of the Company to its individual assets based on their estimated fair values. Reorganization value represents the fair value of the Company’s assets before considering liabilities. The excess reorganization value over the fair value of identified tangible and intangible assets was reported as goodwill.
Environmental Remediation and Restoration Liabilities
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when we believe that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and we can reasonably estimate the amount of the liability. We have accrued $52$47 and $57$51 at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, for all probable environmental remediation and restoration liabilities, which is our best estimate of these liabilities. Based on currently available information and analysis, we believe that it is reasonably possible that the costs associated with these liabilities may fall within a range of $43$34 to $92.$93. This estimate of the range of reasonably possible costs is less certain than the estimates that we make to determine our reserves. To establish the upper limit of this range, we used assumptions that are less favorable to Hexion among the range of reasonably possible outcomes, but we did not assume that we would bear full responsibility for all sites to the exclusion of other potentially responsible parties.
Some of our facilities are subject to environmental indemnification agreements, where we are generally indemnified against damages from environmental conditions that occurred or existed before the closing date of our acquisition of the facility, subject to certain limitations. In other cases we have sold facilities subject to an environmental indemnification agreement pursuant to which we retain responsibility for certain environmental conditions that occurred or existed before the closing date of the sale of the facility.
Income Tax Assets and Liabilities and Related Valuation Allowances
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation that included a broad range of business tax provisions, including but not limited to a reduction in the U.S. federal tax rate from 35% to 21% as well as provisions that limit or eliminate various deductions or credits. The legislation also causes U.S. expenses, such as interest and general administrative expenses, to be taxed and imposes a new tax on U.S. cross-border payments. Furthermore, the legislation includes a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and profits.
In response to the enactment of U.S. tax reform, the SEC issued guidance (referred to as “SAB 118”) to address the complexity in accounting for this new legislation. When the initial accounting for items under the new legislation is incomplete, the guidance allows companies to recognize provisional amounts when reasonable estimates can be made or to continue to apply the prior tax law if a reasonable estimate of the impact cannot be made. The SEC has provided up to a one-year window for companies to finalize the accounting for the impacts of this new legislation and we anticipate finalizing our accounting during 2018.
While our accounting for the new U.S. tax legislation is not complete, we have made reasonable estimates for certain provisions and recognized no net tax expense in our 2017 financial statements. The tax expense related to U.S. tax reform is fully offset by the release of the associated valuation allowance. We continue to evaluate the accounting impacts of the legislation, assemble and analyze the required information, and await additional guidance from the U.S. Treasury Department, the IRS or other standard-setting bodies. Additionally, we continue to analyze other information and regulatory guidance, and accordingly we may record additional provisional amounts or adjustments to provisional amounts in future periods. See Note 14 for further details on the impacts of U.S. tax reform.
We incurred a provisional income tax expense of $167 associated with revaluing our net U.S. deferred tax attributes to reflect the new U.S. corporate tax rate of 21%, as well as an additional $65 provisional income tax expense associated with the estimated transition tax. Our valuation allowance was reduced by $234 as a result of the impact Tax Reform had on reducing our net deferred tax assets.
Due to the newly enacted U.S. tax rate change, our estimated balances as of December 31, 2017 represent timing differences, which may change when those estimates are finalized with the filing of our 2017 income tax return. At this time, we have not yet gathered, prepared and analyzed the information in sufficient detail to complete the calculations necessary to finalize the amount of our transition tax. As we complete the analysis of accumulated foreign earnings and profits and related foreign taxes paid on an entity by entity basis and finalize the amounts held in cash or other specified assets, we will update our provisional estimate of the transition tax. 
At December 31, 2017,2020, we had a valuation allowance of $522$217 against our deferred income tax assets.This valuation allowance is made up of a $377 $120 valuation allowance against all of our net U.S. federal and state deferred income tax assets, as well as a valuation allowance of $145$97 against a portion of our net foreign deferred income tax assets, primarily in Germany and the Netherlands.
At December 31, 2016,2019, we had a valuation allowance of $651$122 against our deferred income tax assets.This valuation allowance is made up of a $531 $59 valuation allowance against all of our net U.S. federal and state deferred income tax assets, as well as a valuation allowance of $120$63 against a portion of our net foreign deferred income tax assets, primarily in Germany and the Netherlands.
The valuation allowances require an assessment of both negative and positive evidence, such as operating results during the most recent three-year period. This evidence is given more weight than our expectations of future profitability, which are inherently uncertain.


The Company considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, in assessing the need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The Company evaluated four possible sources of taxable income when assessing the realization of deferred tax assets:
Taxable income in prior carryback years;
Future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
Tax planning strategies; and
Future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards.
Under SAB 118, we continue to evaluate our valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets. At this time, we have not yet gathered, prepared For 2020, previous and analyzed the necessary information in sufficient detail to estimate future taxable income. Furthermore, as we complete the analysis of accumulated foreign earnings and profits and related foreign taxes paid on an entity by entity basis and finalize the amounts held in cash or other specified assets, we will update our provisional estimate of the transition tax and assess the impact on our valuation allowance. In 2017, ourcurrent losses in the U.S. and in certain foreign operations infor recent periods provisionally providedcontinue to provide sufficient negative evidence to maintainrequiring a full valuation allowance against the net federal, state, and certain foreign deferred tax assets.

Hexion Inc. | 55 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Uncertainty in income taxes is recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. The guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax return. We also apply the guidance relating to de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The calculation of our income tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex domestic and foreign income tax regulations. Unrecognized tax benefits are generated when there are differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Tax benefits are recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements when it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination. Tax benefits are measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement. To the extent we prevail in matters for which liabilities have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our liabilities, our effective income tax rate in a given period could be materially impacted. An unfavorable income tax settlement may require the use of cash and result in an increase in our effective income tax rate in the year it is resolved. A favorable income tax settlement would be recognized as a reduction in the effective income tax rate in the year of resolution. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we recorded unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $129$194 and $116,$186, respectively.


Pensions and Non-Pension Postretirement Benefit Plans
The amounts that we recognize in our financial statements for pension benefit obligations are determined by actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are certain assumptions, the more significant of which are:
The weighted average rate used for discounting the liability;
The weighted average expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets;
The method used to determine market-related value of pension plan assets;
The weighted average rate of future salary increases; and
The anticipated mortality rate tables.


The discount rate reflects the rate at which pensions could be effectively settled. When selecting a discount rate, our actuaries provide us with a cash flow model that uses the yields of high-grade corporate bonds with maturities consistent with our anticipated cash flow projections. Our pension and OPEB liabilities and related service and interest cost are calculated using a split-rate interest discounting methodology, whereby expected future cash flows related to these liabilities are discounted using multiple interest rates on a forward curve that correspond to the timing of the expected cash flows.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is determined based on the various plans’ current and projected asset mix. To determine the expected overall long-term rate of return on assets, we take into account the rates on long-term debt investments that are held in the portfolio, as well as expected trends in the equity markets, for plans including equity securities.
The market-related value of pension plan assets is determined based on the nature of the investment. Equity and fixed income securities are primarily in pooled asset and mutual funds and are valued based on underlying net asset value multiplied by the number of shares held. The underlying asset values are based on observable inputs and quoted market prices. Cash equivalents represent investments in a collective short term investment fund, which is a cash sweep for uninvested cash that earns interest monthly. For these investments, book value is assumed to equal fair value due to the short duration of the investment term. Investments in commingled funds with exposure to a variety of hedge fund strategies, which are not publicly traded and have ongoing redemption restrictions, are measured at net asset value per share as a practical expedient for fair value, which is derived from the underlying asset values in these funds, only some of which represent observable inputs and quoted market prices.
The rate of increase in future compensation levels is determined based on salary and wage trends in the chemical and other similar industries, as well as our specific compensation targets.
The mortality tables that are used represent the most commonly used mortality projections for each particular country, and reflect projected mortality improvements.
We believe the current assumptions used to estimate plan obligations and pension expense are appropriate in the current economic environment. However, as economic conditions change, we may change some of our assumptions, which could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.


Hexion Inc. | 56 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
The following table presents the sensitivity of our projected pension benefit obligation (“PBO”), accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”), deficit (“Deficit”) and 20172020 pension expense to the following changes in key assumptions:
Increase / (Decrease) at 
Increase /
(Decrease)
Increase / (Decrease) atIncrease /
(Decrease)
December 31, 2017  December 31, 2020
PBO ABO 2018 Expense PBOABO2020 Expense
Assumption:     Assumption:
Increase in discount rate of 0.5%$(81) $(73) $1
Increase in discount rate of 0.5%$(87)$(81)$(3)
Decrease in discount rate of 0.5%70
 61
 (2)Decrease in discount rate of 0.5%100 93 
Increase in estimated return on assets of 1.0%N/A
 N/A
 (6)Increase in estimated return on assets of 1.0%N/AN/A(8)
Decrease in estimated return on assets of 1.0%N/A
 N/A
 6
Decrease in estimated return on assets of 1.0%N/AN/A
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
 
Our reporting units in continuing operations include epoxy, phenolic specialty resins, oilfield, versatics and forest products. Our reporting units are generally one level below our operating segments for which discrete financial information is available and reviewed by segment management. However, components of an operating segment can be aggregated as one reporting unit if the components have similar economic characteristics. Our consolidated goodwill balance from continuing operations was $164 as of December 31, 2020, including $127 related to the forest products reporting unit, $36 related to the versatics reporting unit and $1 related to the epoxy reporting unit.

We perform antest goodwill annually for impairment of value or more frequently when potential impairment triggering events are present. Our annual assessment of qualitative factors to determine whetherimpairment testing date is October 1. Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the existence of any events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that theestimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than theto its carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets. If, after assessing all events and circumstances, we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets, wevalue. We use a probability weighted market and income approach to estimate the fair value of theour reporting unit. Ourunits. The market approach is a comparable analysis technique commonly used in the investment banking and private equity industries based on the EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiple technique. Under this technique, estimated fair value isand the result of a market based EBITDA multiple that is applied to an appropriate historical EBITDA amount, adjusted for the additional fair value that would be assigned by a market participant obtaining control over the reporting unit. Our income approach is based on a discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow model requires managementkey assumptions and estimates utilized in the market and income approaches primarily include market multiples, discount rates and future levels of revenue growth and operating margins, and to project revenues, operating expenses,a lesser extent, estimates and assumptions related to working capital investment, taxes, depreciation and amortization and capital spending and cash flows over a multi-year period, as well as determine the weighted average cost of capital to be used as a discount rate. Applying this discount rate to the multi-year projections provides an estimate of fair value for the reporting unit.projections. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value of the reporting unit’s net assets, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference.
In 2017, due to the Company lowering its forecast of estimated earnings and cash flows for its oilfield business from those previously projected and indefinitely idling a manufacturing facility within its oilfield business, and due to the slower than previously assumed recovery in the oil and gas market,unit exceeds the estimated fair value, of the Company’s oilfield reporting unit was less than the carrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit. In estimating the fair value of the oilfield reporting unit, the Company relied solely on a discounted cash flow model income approach. This was due to the Company’s belief that the reporting unit’s EBITDA, a key input under the market approach, was not representative and consistent with the reporting unit’s historical performance and long-term outlook and, therefore, was not consistent with assumptions that a market participant would use in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. To measure the amount of the goodwill impairment, the Company allocated the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities. As a result of this allocation, the Company estimated that the implied fair value of the oilfield reporting unit’s goodwill was $0. As such, the entire oilfield reporting unit’s goodwill balance of $13 was impaired during the third quarter of 2017, and the Company recognized a goodwillan impairment charge of $13 in its Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins segment, which is included in “Asset impairments” inrecorded for the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Significant unobservable inputs in the discounted cash flow analysis included projected long-term future cash flows, projected growth rates and discount rates associated with this reporting unit. Future projected long-term cash flows and growth rates were derived from models based upon forecasts prepared by the Company’s management. These projected cash flows were discounted using a rate of 13.5%.    difference.
As of October 1, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the estimated fair value of each of our remaining reporting units wascontaining goodwill were deemed to be substantially in excess of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities assigned to each unit. A 20% decreaseThe step-up of fixed and intangible asset values during fresh start accounting resulted in an increase of the EBITDA multiple orcarrying amounts of net assets for the Company’s reporting units that have goodwill, thereby reducing the amount of headroom between the fair value and carrying value of these reporting units. As a 20% increase in the interest rate usedresult, future unfavorable changes to calculate thebusiness results and/or discounted cash flows would notfor these reporting units are more likely to result in anyasset impairments.
    Other Intangible Assets
    We review our amortizable intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that may be a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of our remaining reporting units failing the step oneamortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable, include goodwill impairment, test.idling of a plant and a reduction to the estimated useful life. We may in the future be required to record a significant charge in our consolidated financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our amortizable intangible assets is determined, negatively affecting our results of operations.

Long-Lived Assets
As events warrant, we evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets, other than goodwill, and other indefinite-lived intangibles, by assessing whether the carrying value can be recovered over their remaining useful lives through the expected future undiscounted operating cash flows of the underlying business. Our evaluation of long-lived asset recoverability includes our operating and financing lease right of use assets. Impairment indicators include, but are not limited to, a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used or in its physical condition; a significant adverse change in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset; an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset; current period operating or cash flow losses combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the asset; or a current expectation that it is more likely than not that a long-lived asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. As a result, future decisions to change our manufacturing process, exit certain businesses, reduce excess capacity, temporarily idle facilities and close facilities could result in material impairment charges. Long-lived assets are grouped together at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of cash flows of other groups of long-lived assets. Any impairment loss that may be required is determined by comparing the carrying value of the assets to their estimated fair value. We do not have any indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 2 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a detailed description of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Hexion Inc. | 57 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ITEM 7A - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk, including changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates and certain commodity prices. To manage the volatility related to these exposures we use various financial instruments, including some derivatives, to help us hedge our foreign currency exchange risk and interest rate risk. We also use raw material purchasing contracts and pricing contracts with our customers to help mitigate commodity price risks. These contracts generally do not contain minimum purchase requirements.
We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We manage counterparty credit risk by entering into derivative instruments only with financial institutions with investment-grade ratings.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Our international operations accounted for approximately 60%54% and 53% of our sales in both 20172020 and 2016.2019, respectively. As a result, we have significant exposure to foreign exchange risk on transactions that can potentially be denominated in many foreign currencies. These transactions include foreign currency denominated imports and exports of raw materials and finished goods (both intercompany and third party) and loan repayments. The functional currency of our operating subsidiaries is the related local currency.
We reduce foreign currency cash flow exposure from exchange rate fluctuations where economically feasible by hedging firmly committed foreign currency transactions. Our use of forward contracts is designed to protect our cash flows against unfavorable movements in exchange rates, to the extent of the amount that is under contract. We do not attempt to hedge foreign currency exposure in a manner that would entirely eliminate the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on net income and cash flow. We do not speculate in foreign currency nor do we hedge the foreign currency translation of our international businesses to the U.S. dollar for purposes of consolidating our financial results, or other foreign currency net asset or liability positions.
We are party to various foreign exchange rate swaps in Brazil in order to reduce the foreign currency risk associated with certain assets and liabilities of our Brazilian subsidiary that are denominated in U.S. dollars. The counter-parties to the foreign exchange rate swap agreements are financial institutions with investment grade ratings. We do not apply hedge accounting to these derivative instruments.
Our foreign exchange risk is also mitigated because we operate in many foreign countries, which reduces the concentration of risk in any one currency. In addition, our foreign operations have limited imports and exports, which reduces the potential impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
A 5% strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the primary currencies in which we conduct our non-U.S. operations in 20172020 would generate an approximate $104 negative impact to our estimated net sales. Conversely, a 5% weakening of the U.S. dollar against the same currencies would benefit our estimated net sales by an equal amount.
Interest Rate Risk
TheWe have exposure to interest rate risk through our variable rate borrowing activities. As a result of our emergence from Chapter 11, the interest rates onof approximately 97%28% of our outstanding debt are fixed. AssumingOn October 10, 2019, we executed an interest rate swap agreement to hedge interest rate variability caused by quarterly changes in cash flow due to associated changes in LIBOR under the amountCompany’s Senior Secured Term Loan. In this arrangement, we receive a variable 3-month LIBOR and pay fixed interest rate swaps, effective January 1, 2020 and expiring January 1, 2025, and we have designated $300 of our variable rate Senior Secured Term Loan as the notional amount for the future interest rate payments. As a result of this transaction, 46% of our outstanding debt remains the same, anis at fixed interest rates and approximately 54% of our outstanding debt is exposed to changes in variable interest rates. An increase of 1% in the interest rates on our variable rate debt would increase our 20182020 estimated debt service requirements by approximately $1.$10.

Following is a summary of our outstanding debt as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (see Note 712 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on our debt). The fair value of our publicly held debt is based on the price at which the bonds are traded or quoted at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. All other debt fair values are based on other similar financial instruments, or based upon interest rates that are currently available to us for the issuance of debt with similar terms and maturities.
 20202019
YearDebt
Maturities
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
Fair ValueDebt
Maturities
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
Fair Value
2020$70 5.8 %$71 
2021$82 5.0 %$82 55 5.9 %54 
202234 5.0 %34 32 5.8 %32 
202317 4.9 %17 16 5.9 %15 
20245.0 %5.8 %
20254.9 %5.9 %
2026 and beyond1,651 5.0 %1,671 1,607 5.9 %1,627 
$1,802 $1,822 $1,796 $1,815 
Hexion Inc. | 58 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 2017 2016
Year
Debt
Maturities
 
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
 Fair Value 
Debt
Maturities
 
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
 Fair Value
2017      $107
 7.9% $107
2018$125
 7.5% $125
 713
 7.8% 705
201911
 7.5% 10
 6
 7.6% 6
20202,534
 8.2% 2,206
 2,446
 6.6% 2,138
202183
 10.6% 61
 77
 7.8% 55
2022805
 10.3% 725
 20
 8.7% 20
2023 and beyond190
 7.2% 128
 195
 9.3% 128
 $3,748
   $3,255
 $3,564
   $3,159
We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolios. Our cash equivalent investments and short-term investments are made in instruments that meet the credit quality standards that are established in our investment policies, which also limits the exposure to any one investment. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we had $9$20 and $7,$74, respectively, invested at average rates of 5.3% 2.0%and 9.6%2.1%, respectively, primarily in interest-bearing time deposits.money-market investments. Due to the short maturity of our cash equivalents, the carrying value of these investments approximates fair value. Our short-term investments are recorded at cost which approximates fair value. Our interest rate risk is not significant; a 1% increase or decrease in interest rates on invested cash would not have had a material effect on our net income or cash flows for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
Commodity Risk
We are exposed to price risks on raw material purchases, most significantly with phenol, methanol, urea, acetone, propylene and chlorine. For our commodity raw materials, we have purchase contracts that have periodic price adjustment provisions. Commitments with certain suppliers, including our phenol and urea suppliers, provide up to 100% of our estimated requirements but also provide us with the flexibility to purchase a certain portion of our needs in the spot market, when it is favorable to us. We rely on long-term agreements with key suppliers for most of our raw materials. The loss of a key source of supply or a delay in shipments could have an adverse effect on our business. Should any of our suppliers fail to deliver or should any key long-term supply contracts be cancelled, we would be forced to purchase raw materials in the open market, and no assurances can be given that we would be able to make these purchases or make them at prices that would allow us to remain competitive. Our largest supplier provided approximately 10%9% of our raw material purchases in 2017,2020, and we could incur significant time and expense if we had to replace this supplier. In addition, several feedstocks at various facilities are transported through a pipeline from one supplier. If we were unable to receive these feedstocks through these pipeline arrangements, we may not be able to obtain them from other suppliers at competitive prices or in a timely manner. See the discussion about the risk factor on raw materials in Item 1A of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Natural gas is essential in our manufacturing processes, and its cost can vary widely and unpredictably. To help control our natural gas costs, we hedge a portion of our natural gas purchases for North America by entering into futures contracts for natural gas. These contracts are settled for cash each month based on the closing market price on the last day that the contract trades on the New York Mercantile Exchange. We also enter into fixed price forward contracts for the purchase of electricity at certain of our manufacturing plants to offset the risk associated with increases in the prices of the underlying commodities.
We recognize gains and losses on these contracts each month as gas and electricity is used. Our future commitments are marked-to-market on a quarterly basis. We have not applied hedge accounting to these contracts.
Our commodity risk is moderated through our selected use of customer contracts with selling price provisions that are indexed to publicly available indices for the relevant commodity raw materials.

Hexion Inc. | 59 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Page
Number
Page
Number
Consolidated Financial Statements of Hexion Inc.


Hexion Inc. | 60 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
HEXION INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 
(In millions, except share data)December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
(In millions, except share data)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Assets   Assets
Current assets:   Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $18 and $17, respectively)$115
 $196
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $19 and $17, respectively)462
 390
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $4)Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $4)$204 $254 
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3)Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3)331 316 
Inventories:   Inventories:
Finished and in-process goods221
 199
Finished and in-process goods180 211 
Raw materials and supplies92
 88
Raw materials and supplies85 82 
Current assets held for sale (see Note 11)6
 
Current assets held for sale (see Note 4)Current assets held for sale (see Note 4)114 99 
Other current assets44
 45
Other current assets39 40 
Total current assets940
 918
Total current assets953 1,002 
Investments in unconsolidated entities20
 18
Investments in unconsolidated entities10 14 
Deferred income taxes (see Note 14)8
 10
Long-term assets held for sale (see Note 11)2
 
Deferred income taxes (see Note 17)Deferred income taxes (see Note 17)
Long-term assets held for sale (see Note 4)Long-term assets held for sale (see Note 4)342 400 
Other long-term assets49
 43
Other long-term assets85 44 
Property and equipment:   Property and equipment:
Land84
 79
Land79 82 
Buildings291
 273
Buildings122 114 
Machinery and equipment2,327
 2,353
Machinery and equipment1,270 1,148 
2,702
 2,705
1,471 1,344 
Less accumulated depreciation(1,778) (1,812)Less accumulated depreciation(212)(63)
924
 893
1,259 1,281 
Goodwill (see Note 5)112
 121
Other intangible assets, net (see Note 5)42
 52
Operating lease assets (see Note 13)Operating lease assets (see Note 13)103 110 
Goodwill (see Note 10)Goodwill (see Note 10)164 164 
Other intangible assets, net (see Note 10)Other intangible assets, net (see Note 10)1,079 1,125 
Total assets$2,097
 $2,055
Total assets$4,002 $4,146 
Liabilities and Deficit   
Liabilities and EquityLiabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:   Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$402
 $368
Accounts payable$339 $289 
Debt payable within one year (see Note 7)125
 107
Debt payable within one year (see Note 12)Debt payable within one year (see Note 12)82 70 
Interest payable82
 70
Interest payable30 35 
Income taxes payable12
 13
Income taxes payable17 
Accrued payroll and incentive compensation47
 55
Accrued payroll and incentive compensation42 43 
Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale (see Note 11)2
 
Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale (see Note 4)Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale (see Note 4)70 69 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities (see Note 13)Current portion of operating lease liabilities (see Note 13)19 20 
Other current liabilities135
 159
Other current liabilities111 95 
Total current liabilities805
 772
Total current liabilities699 638 
Long-term liabilities:   Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt (see Note 7)3,584
 3,397
Long-term pension and postretirement benefit obligations (see Note 9)262
 246
Deferred income taxes (see Note 14)11
 13
Long-term debt (see Note 12)Long-term debt (see Note 12)1,710 1,715 
Long-term pension and postretirement benefit obligations (see Note 15)Long-term pension and postretirement benefit obligations (see Note 15)250 223 
Deferred income taxes (see Note 17)Deferred income taxes (see Note 17)161 149 
Operating lease liabilities (see Note 13)Operating lease liabilities (see Note 13)76 82 
Long-term liabilities associated with assets held for sale (see Note 4)Long-term liabilities associated with assets held for sale (see Note 4)74 56 
Other long-term liabilities177
 166
Other long-term liabilities209 208 
Total liabilities4,839
 4,594
Total liabilities3,179 3,071 
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 7 and 8)   
Deficit   
Common stock—$0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized, 170,605,906 issued and 82,556,847 outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 20161
 1
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 14)Commitments and contingencies (see Note 14)00
EquityEquity
Common stock—$0.01 par value; 100 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
at both December 31, 2020 and 2019
Common stock—$0.01 par value; 100 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
at both December 31, 2020 and 2019
Paid-in capital526
 526
Paid-in capital1,169 1,165 
Treasury stock, at cost—88,049,059 shares(296) (296)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(8) (39)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(27)(1)
Accumulated deficit(2,964) (2,730)Accumulated deficit(319)(89)
Total Hexion Inc. shareholders’ deficit(2,741) (2,538)
Noncontrolling interest(1) (1)
Total deficit(2,742) (2,539)
Total liabilities and deficit$2,097
 $2,055
Total equityTotal equity823 1,075 
Total liabilities and equityTotal liabilities and equity$4,002 $4,146 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Hexion Inc. | 61 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
HEXION INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
 Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017 2016 2015
Net sales$3,591

$3,438
 $4,140
Cost of sales3,090
 3,038
 3,540
Gross profit501

400
 600
Selling, general and administrative expense307
 328
 306
Gain on dispositions (see Note 12)
 (240) 
Asset impairments (see Note 2)13
 
 6
Business realignment costs (see Note 3)
52
 55
 16
Other operating expense, net17
 13
 12
Operating income112

244
 260
Interest expense, net329
 310
 326
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt3
 (48) (41)
Other non-operating income, net
 (7) (3)
Loss before income tax and earnings from unconsolidated entities(220)
(11) (22)
Income tax expense (see Note 14)18
 38
 34
Loss before earnings from unconsolidated entities(238) (49) (56)
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes4
 11
 17
Net loss(234) (38) (39)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 

(1)
Net loss attributable to Hexion Inc.$(234) $(38) $(40)
SuccessorPredecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
(In millions)
Net sales$2,510 $1,323 $1,481 $3,137 
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)2,043 1,117 1,211 2,559 
Selling, general and administrative expense231 124 128 243 
Depreciation and amortization191 93 43 98 
Gain on dispositions (see Note 18)(44)
Asset impairments (see Note 8)
16 28 
Business realignment costs69 22 14 27 
Other operating expense, net24 16 17 37 
Operating (loss) income(64)(49)68 189 
Interest expense, net100 55 89 365 
Reorganization items, net (see Note 7)
(2,970)
Other non-operating income, net(15)(11)(12)
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax and earnings from unconsolidated entities(149)(104)2,960 (164)
Income tax expense (benefit) (see Note 17)
14 (10)201 31 
(Loss) income from continuing operations before earnings from unconsolidated entities(163)(94)2,759 (195)
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes
(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of taxes(161)(92)2,760 (191)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes(69)135 28 
Net (loss) income(230)(88)2,895 (163)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest(1)(1)
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(230)$(89)$2,894 $(162)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Hexion Inc. | 62 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
HEXION INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(LOSS) INCOME


 Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017 2016 2015
Net loss$(234) $(38) $(39)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Foreign currency translation adjustments33
 (23) (88)
Loss recognized from pension and postretirement benefits(2) (1) 
Other comprehensive income (loss)31
 (24)
(88)
Comprehensive loss(203) (62) (127)
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 (1)
Comprehensive loss attributable to Hexion Inc.$(203) $(62) $(128)
SuccessorPredecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
(In millions)
Net (loss) income$(230)$(88)$2,895 $(163)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments(8)(3)(8)(8)
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedge(18)
Loss recognized from pension and postretirement benefits(2)
Other comprehensive loss(26)(1)(8)(10)
Comprehensive (loss) income(256)(89)2,887 (173)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest(1)(1)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(256)$(90)$2,886 $(172)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Hexion Inc. | 63 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
HEXION INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
SuccessorPredecessor
(In millions)Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
Net (loss) income$(230)$(88)$2,895 $(163)
Less: (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes(69)135 28 
(Loss) income from continuing operations(161)(92)2,760 (191)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization191 93 43 98 
Non-cash asset impairments16 28 
Non-cash reorganization items, net(3,156)
Non-cash impact of inventory step-up27 
Deferred tax expense (benefit)(9)140 12 
Gain on dispositions (see Note 18)(44)
Loss on sale of assets
Amortization of deferred financing fees49 
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(3)(1)(7)
Non-cash stock based compensation expense17 
Unrealized losses (gains) on pension and postretirement benefit plan liabilities(13)
Financing fees included in net loss136 
Other non-cash adjustments(1)(2)(1)(3)
Net change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable(3)108 (73)
Inventories35 15 (20)(30)
Accounts payable44 (15)(15)(3)
Income taxes payable(9)(3)15 
Other assets, current and non-current(21)25 
Other liabilities, current and non-current(11)11 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations116 174 (163)(63)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from discontinued operations15 50 (10)40 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities131 224 (173)(23)
Cash flows used in investing activities
Capital expenditures(108)(47)(41)(81)
Proceeds from dispositions, net49 
Proceeds from sale of assets, net
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations(105)(47)(40)(31)
Net cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations(21)(11)(2)(9)
Net cash used in investing activities(126)(58)(42)(40)
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities
Net short-term debt (repayments) borrowings(7)(24)(4)10 
Borrowings of long-term debt256 118 2,313 540 
Repayments of long-term debt(293)(130)(2,261)(468)
Return of capital to parent (see Note 9)(13)
Proceeds from rights offering300 
Financing fees paid(2)(136)(1)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(57)(38)212 81 
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash(5)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash(50)129 (3)13 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period254 125 128 115 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$204 $254 $125 $128 
Hexion Inc. | 64 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017 2016 2015
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities     
Net loss$(234) $(38) $(39)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization115
 131
 137
Non-cash asset impairments and accelerated depreciation27
 129
 8
Deferred tax (benefit) expense(3) 2
 7
Gain on dispositions (see Note 12)
 (240) 
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(1) 7
 (4)
Amortization of deferred financing fees16
 15
 15
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt3
 (48) (41)
Gain on step acquisition (see Note 13)
 
 (5)
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)3
 (52) 12
Unrealized (gains) losses on pension and postretirement benefit plan liabilities(4) 34
 (13)
Other non-cash adjustments(5) 3
 (4)
Net change in assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable(50) (1) 91
Inventories(10) (8) 65
Accounts payable19
 27
 (21)
Income taxes payable9
 17
 8
Other assets, current and non-current1
 (22) 24
Other liabilities, current and non-current(39) 24
 (27)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(153) (20) 213
Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities     
Capital expenditures(117) (140) (175)
Capitalized interest(1) (1) (4)
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired



 (7)
Proceeds from dispositions, net
 281
 
Cash received on buyer’s note
 75
 
Proceeds from sale of investments, net
 
 6
Change in restricted cash1
 (9) 8
Investment in affiliates
 (1) 
Proceeds from sale of assets, net8
 5
 17
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(109) 210
 (155)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities     
Net short-term debt borrowings (repayments)21
 (22) (3)
Borrowings of long-term debt1,429
 644
 523
Repayments of long-term debt(1,251) (856) (485)
Long-term debt and credit facility financing fees(25) (1) (11)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities174
 (235) 24
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents6
 (4) (10)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(82) (49) 72
Cash and cash equivalents (unrestricted) at beginning of year179
 228
 156
Cash and cash equivalents (unrestricted) at end of year$97
 $179
 $228
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information     
Cash paid for:     
Interest, net$302
 $306
 $312
Income taxes, net of cash refunds13
 24
 17
Non-cash investing activities:     
Non-cash assumption of debt on step acquisition (see Note 13)$
 $
 $18
Acceptance of buyer’s note (see Note 12)
 75
 


SuccessorPredecessor
(In millions)Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for:
Interest, net$103 $22 $71 $318 
Income taxes, net of cash refunds16 10 10 17 
Reorganization items, net188 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Hexion Inc. | 65 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
HEXION INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF DEFICITEQUITY (DEFICIT)
(In millions)Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Treasury
Stock
Note
Receivable
From Parent
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Accumulated
(Deficit) Equity
Total Hexion Inc. (Deficit) EquityNon-controlling InterestTotal Shareholder’s (Deficit) Equity
Predecessor
Balance at December 31, 2017$$526 $(296)$(8)$(2,964)$(2,741)$(1)$(2,742)
Net loss(162)(162)(1)(163)
Other comprehensive loss(10)(10)(10)
Impact of change in accounting policy (ASC 606)
Balance at December 31, 2018$$526 $(296)$$(18)$(3,125)$(2,912)$(2)$(2,914)
Net income2,894 2,894 2,895 
Other comprehensive loss(8)(8)(8)
Elimination of Predecessor Equity(1)(526)296 231 
Elimination of Predecessor accumulated other comprehensive loss26 26 26 
Balance at July 1, 2019$$$$$$$$(1)$(1)
Issuance of Successor Company common stock1,157 1,157 1,157 
Successor
Balance at July 2, 2019$$1,157 $$$$1,157 $(1)$1,156 
Net loss(89)(89)(88)
Stock-based compensation
Other comprehensive loss(1)(1)(1)
Balance at December 31, 2019$$1,165 $$(1)$(89)$1,075 $$1,075 
Net loss(230)(230)(230)
Stock-based compensation17 17 17 
Other comprehensive loss(26)(26)(26)
Return of capital to parent (see Note 9)(13)(13)(13)
Distribution of affiliate loan (see Note 9)(10)(10)(10)
Settlement of affiliate loan (see Note 9)10 10 10 
Balance at December 31, 2020$$1,169 $$$(27)$(319)$823 $$823 
(In millions)
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Hexion Inc. Deficit Non-controlling Interest Total
Balance at December 31, 2014$1
 $526
 $(296) $73
 $(2,652) $(2,348) $(2) $(2,350)
Net (loss) income
 
 
 
 (40) (40) 1
 (39)
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (88) 
 (88) 
 (88)
Balance at December 31, 20151
 526
 (296) (15) (2,692) (2,476) (1) (2,477)
Net loss
 
 
 
 (38) (38) 
 (38)
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (24) 
 (24) 
 (24)
Balance at December 31, 20161
 526
 (296) (39) (2,730) (2,538) (1) (2,539)
Net loss
 
 
 
 (234) (234) 
 (234)
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 31
 
 31
 
 31
Balance at December 31, 2017$1
 $526
 $(296) $(8) $(2,964) $(2,741) $(1) $(2,742)


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Hexion Inc. | 66 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
HEXION INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In millions, except share data)
1. Background and Basis of Presentation
Based in Columbus, Ohio, Hexion Inc. (“Hexion” or the “Company”), serves global industrial markets through a broad range of thermoset technologies, specialty products and technical support for customers in a diverse range of applications and industries. At December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had 5244 production and manufacturing facilities, with 2221 located in the United States. The Company’s business is organized based on the products offered and the markets served. At December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had three3 reportable segments: Epoxy, PhenolicAdhesives; Coatings and Coating Resins; Forest Products Resins;Composites; and Corporate and Other.
Sale of Phenolic Specialty Resins Business

On September 27, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) for the sale of its Phenolic Specialty Resins ("PSR"), Hexamine and European-based Forest Products Resins businesses (together with PSR, the “Held for Sale Business”) to Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC and Investindustrial (the “Buyers”) for a purchase price of approximately $425. The consideration consists of $335 in cash and certain assumed liabilities with the remainder in future contingent proceeds based on the performance of the Held for Sale Business. For more information, see Note 4 “Discontinued Operations”.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company reclassified the assets and liabilities of the Held for Sale Business as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and reported the results of the operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 as “(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of taxes” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amounts for prior periods have similarly been retrospectively reclassified for all periods presented.

Additionally, the Company has included $15, $9, $10 and $24 in both “Net sales” and “Cost of sales” within the Company’s continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and year ended December 31, 2018, respectively, which represents sales from the Company’s continuing operations to the Held for Sale Business that were previously eliminated in consolidation. These reclassifications had no impact on “Net (loss) income” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for any of the periods presented.    

Emergence from Chapter 11 and Fresh Start Accounting
As a result of the Company’s reorganization and emergence from Chapter 11 (as defined in Note 5) on the morning of July 1, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), the Company’s direct parent is Hexion Intermediate Holding 2, Inc. (“Hexion Intermediate”), a holding company and wholly owned subsidiary of Hexion Intermediate Holding 1, Inc., a holding company and wholly owned subsidiary of Hexion Holdings Corporation, the ultimate parent of Hexion (“Hexion Holdings” or “Parent”). Prior to its reorganization, the Company’s parent was Hexion LLC, a holding company and wholly owned subsidiary of Hexion Holdings LLC (“(now known as Hexion Holdings”TopCo, LLC or “TopCo”), the previous ultimate parent entity of Hexion. Hexion, Holdings iswhich was controlled by investment funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Management Holdings, L.P. (together with Apollo Global Management, LLCInc. and its subsidiaries, “Apollo”). On the Effective Date, the Company’s existing common stock were cancelled and 100 new shares of common stock were issued at a par value of $0.01 to the Company’s new direct parent Hexion Intermediate in accordance with the Plan (as defined in Note 5). See Note 5 for more information.
As of December 31, 2017,    The Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 1, 2019 (the “Petition Date”) and as the Company has elected notpreviously disclosed, based on its financial condition and its projected operating results, the defaults under its debt agreements, and the risks and uncertainties surrounding its Chapter 11 proceedings (see Note 5), that there was substantial doubt as to apply push-downthe Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as of the issuance of the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Since the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 on July 1, 2019, based on its new capital structure, liquidity position and projected operating results, the Company expects to continue as a going concern for the next twelve months. See Note 5 for more information.
On the Effective Date, in accordance with ASC 852, the Company applied fresh start accounting to its financial statements as (i) the holders of existing voting shares of the Company prior to its parent’semergence received less than 50% of the voting shares of the Company outstanding following its emergence from bankruptcy and (ii) the reorganization value of the Company’s assets immediately prior to confirmation of the plan of reorganization was less than the post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. Fresh start accounting was applied to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of July 1, 2019, the date it emerged from bankruptcy, which resulted in a new basis of accounting and the Company became a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the Company allocated the reorganization value of the Company to its individual assets based on their estimated fair values. Reorganization value represents the fair value of the Company’s assets before considering liabilities. The excess reorganization value over the fair value of identified tangible and intangible assets was reported as goodwill.
    As a result of the application of fresh start accounting and the effects of the implementation of the Plan, the Consolidated Financial Statements after the Effective Date are not comparable with the Consolidated Financial Statements prior combinationto that date. References to “Successor” or “Successor Company” relate to the financial position and results of operations of the Company after the Effective Date. References to “Predecessor” or “Predecessor Company” refer to the financial position and results of operations of the Company on or before the Effective Date. Refer to Note 6 for more information.
Hexion Inc. | 67 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Financial Reporting in Reorganization
    Effective on the Petition Date, the Company applied Accounting Standard Codification, No. 852, “Reorganizations,” (“ASC 852”) which is applicable to companies under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. It requires the financial statements for periods subsequent to the Chapter 11 filing to distinguish transactions and Momentive Performance Materials Inc.events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses that are directly associated with reorganization proceedings must be reported separately as “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the balance sheet must distinguish debtor pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise (“MPM”LSTC”), from liabilities of non-filing entities, pre-petition liabilities that are not subject to compromise and post-petition liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. LSTC are pre-petition obligations that are not fully secured and have at least a former subsidiarypossibility of Hexion Holdings.not being repaid at the full claim amount. LSTC related to debt, its related interest payable and certain affiliate payables were settled in accordance with the Plan, as applicable, on or shortly after the Company emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 1, 2019. As of July 1, 2019, all remaining liabilities subject to compromise were not impaired and remain on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
    The Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K were prepared under the basis of accounting assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplated continuity of operations, realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation—The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries in which minority shareholders hold no substantive participating rights. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s share of the net earnings of 20% to 50% owned companies, which are accounted for which itunder the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significance influence over operating and financial policies (but not control), are included in “Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Investments in the other companies are carried at cost.
The Company has recorded a noncontrolling interest for the equity interests in consolidated subsidiaries that are not 100% owned.
The Company’s unconsolidated investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting include the following as of December 31, 2017:2020:
49.99% interest in Momentive UV Coatings (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, a joint venture that manufactures UV-curable coatings and adhesives in China;
50% ownership interest in Hexion Shchekinoazot Holding B.V., a joint venture that manufactures forest products resins in Russia;Russia (see Note 4 for discussion of Russia JV within discontinued operations);
49% ownership interest in Sanwei Hexion Company Limited, a joint venture that manufactures versatic acid derivatives in China;
50% ownership interest in Hexion Australia Pty Ltd, a joint venture which provides urea formaldehyde resins and other products to industrial customers in western Australia; andAustralia.
50% ownership interest in MicroBlend Columbia S.A.S, a joint venture that distributes custom point-of-sale paint mixing systems and paint bases to consumer retail stores in Latin America.
Foreign Currency Translations and Transactions—Assets and liabilities of foreign affiliates are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income, expenses and cash flows are translated at average exchange rates during the year. The Company recognizeddid not recognize a transaction losses of $4, gains of $10 and losses of $9gain or loss for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020. The Company recognized transaction gains (losses) of $5, $(8) and 2015,$30 for the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor periods January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively, which are included as a component of “Net loss.(loss) income.” In addition, gains or losses related to the Company’s intercompany loans payable and receivable denominated in a foreign currency other than the subsidiary’s functional currency that are deemed to be permanently invested are remeasured to cumulative translation and recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The effect of translation is included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.”
Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and also the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. In addition, it requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates that are included in the financial statements are environmental remediation liabilities, legal liabilities, deferred tax assets and liabilities and related valuation allowances, income tax accruals, pension and postretirement assets and liabilities, valuation allowancesreserves for uncollectible accounts receivable, and inventories, general insurance liabilities, asset impairments, and fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business acquisitions.acquisitions, and valuations associated with fresh start accounting. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—The Company considers all highly liquid investments that are purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company had interest-bearing time deposits and other cash equivalent investments of $9 $20and $7,$74, respectively. The Company’s restricted cash balances consist primarily of amounts on deposit to secure various international lines$4 as of credit, as well as amounts depositedboth December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively represent deposits to secure certain bank guarantees issued to third parties to guarantee potential obligations of the Company primarily related to the completion of tax audits and environmental liabilities.audits. These balances will remain restricted as long as the underlying exposures exist. These amountsexist and are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of “Cash and cash equivalents.”

Hexion Inc. | 68 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Allowance for Doubtful AccountsUnder adoption of ASU 2016-13, the Company has updated its credit loss methodology to consider a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to determine its credit loss estimates. The Company utilizes a historical aging method disaggregated by portfolio segment of geographic region, and then the Company makes any necessary adjustments for current conditions and forecasts about future economic conditions for calculating its allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company evaluates each pooled receivables’ geographic region by differing regional industrial and economic conditions, overall end market conditions and groups of customers with similar risk profiles related to timing and uncertainty of future collections. If particular accounts is estimated using factors such as customerreceivable balances no longer display risk characteristics that are similar to other pooled receivables, the Company performs individual assessments of expected credit ratings and past collection history.losses for those specific receivables. Receivables are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is probable that the receivable will not be collected.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts provision for expected credit losses reflected the current business conditions, forecasts of future economic conditions and the impacts related to the global business and market disruptions of the coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic, in accordance with ASU 2016-13 (see Note 3 for more information) which did not result in an increase for the year. The Company’s current expectations and assumptions regarding its business, the economy and other future events and conditions are based on currently available financial, economic and competitive data and current business plans as of December 31, 2020. Actual results could vary materially depending on risks and uncertainties that may affect the Company’s operations, markets, services, prices and other factors.

The Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at both December 31, 2020 and 2019, to reduce accounts receivable to their estimated net realizable value. Accounts receivable balances are written-off against the allowance if a final determination of uncollectibility is made. There were no write-offs or recoveries for the year ended December 31, 2020. Prior to adoption of ASU 2016-13, the Company’s policy for the allowance for doubtful accounts was estimated using factors such as customer credit ratings and past collection history.
Inventories—Inventories are stated at lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in, first-out method. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable manufacturing overheads, which are based on normal production capacity. Abnormal manufacturing costs are recognized as period costs and fixed manufacturing overheads are allocated based on normal production capacity. An allowance is provided for excess and obsolete inventories based on management’s review of inventories on-hand compared to estimated future usage and sales. Inventories in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are presented net of an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory of $9 at both December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Deferred Expenses—Deferred debt financing costs are included in “Long-term debt” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the exception of deferred financing costs related to revolving line of credit arrangements, which are included in “Other long-term assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These costs are amortized over the life of the related debt or credit facility using the effective interest method. Upon extinguishment of any debt, the related debt issuance costs are written off. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s unamortized deferred financing costs included in “Other long-term assets” were $8 and $9, respectively, and unamortized deferredDeferred debt financing costs included in “Long-term debt” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $41less than $1 at December 31, 2020.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, in connection with the application of fresh start accounting, any existing debt issuance costs were included in “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and $38, respectively.there were no deferred debt financing costs included in “Long-term debt” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.
Property and Equipment—Land, buildings and machinery and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of properties (the averagerange of estimated useful lives for buildings and machinery and equipment arewere 9 to 39 years and 1 to 20 years, respectively at December 31, 2020 and 15 years, respectively)2019). Assets under capitalfinance leases are amortized over the lesser of their useful life or the lease term. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals and turnarounds (periodic maintenance and repairs to major units of manufacturing facilities) are expensed as incurred. When property and equipment is retired or disposed of, the asset and related depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in operating income. The Company capitalizes interest costs that are incurred during the construction of property and equipment. Property and equipment was recorded at its estimated fair value in connection with the application of fresh start accounting, resulting in the remeasurement of accumulated depreciation to zero as of July 1, 2019 (see Note 6. Depreciation expense was $103, $119$131, $90, $40 and $124$86 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015,the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively. Additionally, for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020 and 2015, $14, $129,2018, $2 and $2,$4, respectively,of accelerated depreciation was recorded as a result of shortening the estimated useful lives of certain long-lived assets related to planned facility rationalizations. There was no accelerated depreciation in the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 or in the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019. Lastly, for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015,the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018, “Capitalized expenditures” in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows were increased by $2, decreased by $8, increased by $4$7 and decreasedincreased by $4,$5, respectively, to reflect the change in invoiced but unpaid capital expenditures at each respective year-end as a non-cash investing activity.
Leases—The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 using a modified retrospective adoption method at January 1, 2019. Under this method of adoption, there is no impact to the comparative Consolidated Statement of Operations and the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company also determined that there was no cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company will continue to report periods prior to January 1, 2019 in its financial statements under prior guidance as outlined in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 840, “Leases”. In addition, the Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which allowed the Company to carry forward its historical lease classification. The Company also elected the hindsight practical expedient to determine the lease term for existing leases.

Hexion Inc. | 69 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
The Company determines if a contract is a lease at the inception of the arrangement. The Company reviews all options to extend, terminate, or purchase its right of use assets at the inception of the lease and accounts for these options when they are reasonably certain of being exercised. Nearly all of the Company’s lease contracts do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate. For these contracts, the Company estimates the incremental borrowing rate to discount the lease payments based on information available at lease commencement. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet and the Company recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For lease agreements entered into or reassessed after the adoption of Topic 842, the Company combines lease and non-lease components. See Note 13 for more information.
Capitalized Software—The Company capitalizes certain costs, such as software coding, installation and testing, that are incurred to purchase or create and implement computer software for internal use. Amortization is recorded on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives, which range from 1 to 5 years.
Goodwill and Intangibles—The excess of purchase price over net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired is carried as “Goodwill” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Separately identifiable intangible assets that are used in the operations of the business (e.g., patents and technology, tradenames, customer lists and contracts) are recorded at cost (fair value at the time of acquisition) and reported as “Other intangible assets, net” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Costs to renew or extend the term of identifiable intangible assets are expensed as incurred. The Company does not amortize goodwill. Intangible assets with determinable lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the legal or usefuleconomic life of the assets, which range from 115 to 3025 years (see Note 5)6 and Note 10).
As a result of the application of fresh start accounting the Company established $178 of Successor goodwill and $1,219 of Successor intangibles upon Emergence. Refer to Note 6 for additional information related to Emergence. The amount of goodwill and intangibles related to continuing operations is $164 and $1,079, respectively. Refer to Note 10 for additional information.
Impairment—The Company reviews property and equipment, leases and all amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability is based on estimated undiscounted cash flows or other relevant observable measures. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment may exist, by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit with goodwill to its carrying value to determine if there is an indication that a potential impairment may exist.
Long-Lived Assets and Amortizable Intangible Assets
There were no$16 long-lived asset impairments recorded during the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.there were 0 long-lived asset impairments for the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 or the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, the Company recorded long-lived asset impairments of $6$28, which are included in “Asset impairments” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 6)8 for more information).

Goodwill
The Company’s reporting units in continuing operations include epoxy, versatics and forest products. The Company’s reporting units are generally one level below the operating segments for which discrete financial information is available and reviewed by segment management. However, components of an operating segment can be aggregated as one reporting unit if the components have similar economic characteristics. The Company’s consolidated goodwill balance from continuing operations was $164 as of December 31, 2020, including $127 related to the forest products reporting unit, $36 related to the versatics reporting unit and $1 related to the epoxy reporting unit.
The Company performs antests goodwill annually for impairment of value or more frequently when potential impairment triggering events are present. The Company’s annual assessment of qualitative factors to determine whetherimpairment testing date is October 1. Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the existence of any events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that theestimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than theto its carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets. If, after assessing all events and circumstances, the Company determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets, thevalue. The Company uses a probability weighted market and income approach to estimate the fair value of theits reporting unit.units. The Company’s market approach is a comparable analysis technique commonly used in the investment banking and private equity industries based on the EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiple technique. Under this technique, estimated fair value isand the result of a market-based EBITDA multiple that is applied to an appropriate historical EBITDA amount, adjusted for the additional fair value that would be assigned by a market participant obtaining control over the reporting unit. The Company’s income approach is based on a discounted cash flow model. When the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill is greater than the estimated fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference.
In 2017, the Company lowered its forecast of estimated earningsThe key assumptions and cash flows for its oilfield business from those previously projected, and indefinitely idled a manufacturing facility within its oilfield business. This was due to the slower than previously assumed recoveryestimates utilized in the oilmarket and gas market. Asincome approaches primarily include market multiples, discount rates and future levels of September 30, 2017, the estimated fair value of the Company’s oilfield reporting unit was less thanrevenue growth and operating margins, and to a lesser extent, estimates and assumptions related to working capital investment, taxes, depreciation and amortization and capital spending projections. If the carrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit. In estimating the fair value of the oilfield reporting unit exceeds the Company relied solely on a discounted cash flow model income approach. This was due to the Company’s belief that the reporting unit’s EBITDA, a key input under the market approach, was not representative and consistent with the reporting unit’s historical performance and long-term outlook and, therefore, was not consistent with assumptions that a market participant would use in determining theestimated fair value, of the reporting unit. When the fair value of the reporting unit was determined, an impairment charge was recognizedis recorded for the amount by which the carrying amount of oilfield’s net assets exceeded its fair value. As such, the entire oilfield reporting unit’s goodwill balance of $13 was impaired during the third quarter of 2017, and the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $13 in its Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins segment, which is included in “Asset impairments” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Significant unobservable inputs in the discounted cash flow analysis included projected long-term future cash flows, projected growth rates and discount rates associated with this reporting unit. Future projected long-term cash flows and growth rates were derived from models based upon forecasts prepared by the Company’s management. These projected cash flows were discounted using a rate of 13.5%.difference.
As of October 1, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the estimated fair value of each of the Company’s remaining reporting units was deemed to be substantially in excess of the carrying amount of assets (including goodwill) and liabilities assigned to each reporting unit.
Assets The step-up of fixed and Liabilities Held for Sale - The assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 related to the proposed saleintangible asset values during fresh start accounting resulted in an increase of the carrying amounts of net assets for the Company’s Additive Technology Groupreporting units that have goodwill, thereby reducing the amount of headroom between the fair value and carrying value of these reporting units. As a result, future unfavorable changes to business (“ATG”)results and/or discounted cash flows for these reporting units are classified as “Current assets held for sale”, “Long-term assets held for sale”, and “Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 11 for more information.likely to result in asset impairments.
General Insurance—The Company is generally insured for losses and liabilities for workers’ compensation, physical damage to property, business interruption and comprehensive general, product and vehicle liability under high-deductible insurance policies. The Company records losses when they are probable and reasonably estimable and amortizes insurance premiums over the life of the respective insurance policies.
Hexion Inc. | 70 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Legal Claims and Costs—The Company accrues for legal claims and costs in the period in which a claim is made or an event becomes known, if the amounts are probable and reasonably estimable. Each claim is assigned a range of potential liability and the most likely amount is accrued. If there is no amount in the range of potential liability that is most likely, the low end of the range is accrued. The amount accrued includes all costs associated with the claim, including settlements, assessments, judgments and fines. Legal fees are expensed as incurred (see Note 8)14).
Environmental Matters—Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Environmental accruals are reviewed on a quarterly basis and as events and developments warrant (see Note 8)14).
Asset Retirement Obligations—Asset retirement obligations are initially recorded at their estimated net present values in the period in which the obligation occurs, with a corresponding increase to the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its settlement value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. When the liability is settled, a gain or loss is recognized for any difference between the settlement amount and the liability that was recorded.
Revenue RecognitionRevenueThe Company follows the principles-based five step model to recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers and in an amount that reflects the consideration for product sales,which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenue, net of estimated allowances and returns, is recognized when the Company has completed its performance obligations under a contract and control of the product is transferred to the customer. Substantially all revenue is recognized at the time shipment is made or upon delivery as risk and title to the product transfer to the customer. Sales, value add, and other taxes that are collected concurrently with revenue-producing activities are excluded from revenue. Contract terms for certain transactions, including sales made on a consignment basis, result in the transfer of control of the finished product to the customer prior to the point at which either occurs at the time shipment is made or upon delivery.Company has the right to invoice for the product. In situations where product is delivered by pipeline, riskthese cases,timing of revenue recognition will differ from the timing of invoicing to customers and title transfers whenwill result in the product moves across an agreed-upon transfer point, which is typically the customers’ property line. Product sales delivered by pipeline are measured based on daily flow meter readings.Company recording a contract asset. The Company’s standard termsCompany adopted ASU 2014-09 as of delivery are included in its contracts of sale or on its invoices. On January 1, 2018 utilizing a modified retrospective approach. A contract asset balance of $5 and $6 is recorded within “Other current assets” at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, in the Company adopted Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). See furtherConsolidated Balance Sheet. Refer to Note 20 for additional discussion below.of the Company’s net sales by reportable segment disaggregated by geographic region.
Shipping and Handling—Freight costs that are billed to customers are included in “Net sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Shipping costs are incurred to move the Company’s products from production and storage facilities to the customer. Handling costs are incurred from the point the product is removed from inventory until it is provided to the shipper and generally include costs to store, move and prepare the products for shipment. Revenue from shipping and handling services is recognized when control of the product is transferred to the customer. Shipping and handling costs are recorded in “Cost of sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Turnaround Costs—The Company periodically performs procedures at its major production facilities to extend the useful life, increase output and efficiency and ensure the long-term reliability and safety of plant machinery (“turnaround” or “turnaround costs”). As a result of the application of fresh start accounting upon the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, the Successor Company adopted an accounting policy to capitalize certain turnaround costs and amortize on a straight-line basis over the estimated period until the next turnaround. Costs for routine repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Capitalized turnaround costs were $7 and $2 at December 31, 2020 and 2019 and are included in “Machinery and equipment” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Research and Development Costs—Funds are committed to research and development activities for technical improvement of products and processes that are expected to contribute to future earnings. We also provide customer service through our technical staff as part of our research and development program to discover new applications and processes. All costs associated with research and development and technical services are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development and technical service expense was $58, $59$38, $20, $21 and $65$43 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Successor period ended July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015,the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively, and is included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
 
Business Realignment Costs—The Company incurred “Business realignment costs” totaling $52, $55$69, $22, $14 and $16$27 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2017, these2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively. These costs primarily included costs related to in-process cost reduction programs and certain in-process and recently completed facility rationalizations. For the year ended December 31, 2016, these costs primarily included costs related to the rationalization at our Norco, LA manufacturing facility and costs related to certain cost reduction programs. For the year ended December 31, 2015, these costs primarily included expenses related to certain cost reduction programs, as well as costs for environmental remediation at certain formerly owned locations.
Pension and Other Non-Pension Postretirement Benefit Liabilities—Pension and other non-pension postretirement benefit (“OPEB”) assumptions are significant inputs to the actuarial models that measure pension and OPEB benefit obligations and related effects on operations. Two assumptions, discount rate and expected return on assets, are important elements of plan expense and asset/liability measurement. The Company evaluates these critical assumptions at least annually on a plan and country-specific basis. The Company periodically evaluates other assumptions involving demographic factors, such as retirement age, mortality and turnover, and updates them to reflect the Company's experience and expectations for the future. Actual results in any given year will often differ from actuarial assumptions because of economic and other factors.
Accumulated and projected benefit obligations are measured as the present value of future cash payments. The Company discounts these cash payments using a split-rate interest approach. This approach uses multiple interest rates from market-observed forward yield curves which correspond to the estimated timing of the related benefit payments. Lower discount rates increase present values and subsequent-year pension expense; higher discount rates decrease present values and subsequent-year pension and OPEB expense.values.
Hexion Inc. | 71 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, the Company considers current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets. In developing future return expectations for the principal benefit plans’ assets, the Company evaluates general market trends as well as key elements of asset class returns such as expected earnings growth, yields and spreads across a number of potential scenarios.
Upon the Company’s annual remeasurement of its pension and OPEB liabilities in the fourth quarter, or on an interim basis as triggering events warrant remeasurement, the Company immediately recognizes gains and losses as a mark-to-market (“MTM”) gain or loss through earnings. As such, the Company’s net periodic pension and OPEB expense consists of i) service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of prior service cost/credits recognized on a quarterly basis and ii) MTM adjustments recognized annually in the fourth quarter upon remeasurement of pension and OPEB liabilities or when triggering events warrant remeasurement.

    The MTM adjustments were a loss of $4, loss of $5 and a gain of $13 for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively, and are recognized in “Other non-operating (income) expense, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. A MTM loss of $44 was recorded upon the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy (see Note 5 for more information) which was included within “Reorganization items, net” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019.
Income Taxes—The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax balances are adjusted to reflect tax rates, based on current tax laws, which will be in effect in the years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized (see Note 14)17).
Unrecognized tax benefits are generated when there are differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Tax benefits are recognized in the consolidated financial statements when it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination. Tax benefits are measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. The Company classifies interest and penalties as a component of tax expense.
The Company monitors changes in tax laws and reflects the impact of tax law changes in the period of enactment. In response to the United States tax reform legislation enacted on December 22, 2017, the SEC issued guidance that allows companies to record provisional amounts for the impacts of U.S. tax reform if the full accounting cannot be completed before filing its 2017 financial statements. For provisions of the tax law where companies are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the impact, the guidance allows companies to continue to apply the historical tax provisions in computing its income tax liability and deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017. The guidance also allows companies to finalize accounting for the U.S. tax reform changes within one year of the enactment date. See Note 1417 for additional information on how the Company recorded the impacts of the U.S. tax reform.
Derivative Financial Instruments— Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesPeriodically, thethe Company is a party to forward exchange contracts, foreign exchange rate swaps, interest rate swaps, natural gas futures and electricity forward contracts to reduce its cash flow exposure to changes in interest rates and natural gas and electricity prices. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. These instrumentsAll derivatives, whether designated as hedging relationships or not, are not accounted for using hedge accounting, but are measuredrecorded on our balance sheet at fair value. For fair value and cash flow hedges qualifying for hedge accounting, the Company formally documents at inception the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, the risk management objective, strategy and the evaluation of effectiveness for the hedge transaction. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, to the balance sheetextent effective, and will be recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations when settled. The effectiveness of a cash flow hedging relationship is established at the inception of the hedge, and after inception the Company performs effectiveness assessments at least every three months. For a derivative that does not qualify or has not been designated as an asset or liability, depending upon the Company’s underlying rights or obligations. Changesa hedge, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings.
Stock-Based CompensationAll stock-based compensation activity relates to shares issued by Hexion Holdings, the ultimate parent of the Company. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award which is amortized as expense over the requisite service period or derived service period on a graded-vesting basisbasis. The expense is recorded net of forfeitures upon occurrence (see Note 10)16).

Transfers of Financial Assets—The Company executes factoring and sales agreements with respect to its trade accounts receivable to support its working capital requirements. The Company accounts for these transactions as either sales-type or financing-type transfers of financial assets based on the terms and conditions of each agreement. For the portion of the sales price that is deferred in a reserve account and subsequently collected, the Company’s policy is to classify the cash in-flows as cash flows from operating activities as the predominant source of the cash flows pertains to the Company’s trade accounts receivable. The remaining portion of the sales price not deferred is recognized as cash flows from operating activities. When the Company retains the servicing rights on the transfers of accounts receivable, it measures these rights at fair value, if material.
Concentrations of Credit Risk—Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily temporary investments and accounts receivable. The Company places its temporary investments with high quality institutions and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution. Concentrations of credit risk for accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of customers in the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographies. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security to support customer receivables.

Hexion Inc. | 72 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Concentrations of Supplier Risk—The Company relies on long-term agreements with key suppliers for most of its raw materials. The loss of a key source of supply or a delay in shipments could have an adverse effect on its business. Should any of the suppliers fail to deliver or should any of the key long-term supply contracts be canceled, the Company would be forced to purchase raw materials at current market prices. The Company’s largest supplier provides approximately 10%9% of raw material purchases. In addition, several of the feedstocks at various facilities are transported through a pipeline from one supplier.
Subsequent Events—The Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to December 31, 20172020 through the date of issuance of its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassifications—Certain amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements for prior period balancesperiods have been reclassified to conform with the current presentations.presentation. These reclassifications were to record the assets and liabilities of the Held for Sale Business and the results of operations as discontinued operations. See Note 4 for more information.
Standard Guarantees / Indemnifications—In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into a number of agreements that contain standard guarantees and indemnities where the Company may indemnify another party for, among other things, breaches of representations and warranties. These guarantees or indemnifications are granted under various agreements, including those governing (i) purchases and sales of assets or businesses, (ii) leases of real property, (iii) licenses of intellectual property, (iv) long-term supply agreements, (v) employee benefits services agreements and (vi) agreements with public authorities on subsidies for designated research and development projects. These guarantees or indemnifications are for the benefit of the (i) buyers in sale agreements and sellers in purchase agreements, (ii) landlords or lessors in lease contracts, (iii) licensors or licensees in license agreements, (iv) vendors or customers in long-term supply agreements, (v) service providers in employee benefits services agreements and (vi) governments or agencies subsidizing research or development. In addition, the Company guarantees some of the payables of its subsidiaries to purchase raw materials in the ordinary course of business.
These parties may also be indemnified against any third party claim resulting from the transaction that is contemplated in the underlying agreement. Additionally, in connection with the sale of assets and the divestiture of businesses, the Company may agree to indemnify the buyer for liabilities related to the pre-closing operations of the assets or businesses sold. Indemnities for pre-closing operations generally include tax liabilities, environmental liabilities and employee benefit liabilities that are not assumed by the buyer in the transaction.
Indemnities related to the pre-closing operations of sold assets normally do not represent additional liabilities to the Company, but simply serve to protect the buyer from potential liability associated with the Company’s existing obligations at the time of sale. As with any liability, theThe Company has accrued for those pre-closing obligations that it considers to be probable and reasonably estimable. The amounts recorded at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 are not significant.material.
While some of these guarantees extend only for the duration of the underlying agreement, many survive the expiration of the term of the agreement or extend into perpetuity (unless they are subject to a legal statute of limitations). There are no specific limitations on the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under its guarantees, nor is the Company able to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made under these guarantees because the triggering events are not predictable.
Our corporate charter also requires us to indemnify, to the extent allowed by New Jersey state corporate law, our directors and officers as well as directors and officers of our subsidiaries and other agents against certain liabilities and expenses incurred by them in carrying out their obligations.
Warranties—The Company does not make express warranties on its products, other than that they comply with the Company’s specifications; therefore, the Company does not record a warranty liability. Adjustments for product quality claims are not material and are charged against net sales.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Newly Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the existing revenue recognition guidance and most industry-specific guidance applicable to revenue recognition. According to the new guidance, an entity will apply a principles-based five step model to recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers and in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The effective date for ASU 2014-09 is for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective approach or a modified approach to adopt the guidance in ASU 2014-09. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 utilizing a modified retrospective approach, which resulted in a cumulative adjustment to equity on the adoption date of January 1, 2018. The implementation of this standard resulted only in timing differences for certain revenue items, which will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Additionally, ASU 2014-09 contains expanded footnote disclosure requirements, which will be reflected in the Company’s SEC filings beginning with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-02: Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 supersedes the existing lease guidance in Topic 840. According to the new guidance, all leases, with limited scope exceptions, will be recorded on the balance sheet in the form of a liability to make lease payments (lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing the potential impact of this standard on its financial statements through a formalized implementation project.

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-15: Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) (“ASU 2016-15”) as part of the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on treatment in the statement of cash flows for eight specific cash flow topics, with the objective of reducing existing diversity in practice. Of the eight cash flow topics addressed in the new guidance, the topics which could have an impact on the Company include debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, accounts receivable factoring, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims and distributions received from equity method investees. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2016-15 on its financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-18: Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”) as part of the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2016-18 requires that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 also requires supplemental disclosure regarding the nature of restrictions on a company’s cash and cash equivalents, such as the purpose and terms of the restriction, expected duration of the restriction and the amount of cash subject to restriction. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Based on restricted cash balances at December 31, 2017 and 2016, beginning and ending cash balances in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows would include $18 and $17, respectively, of restricted cash upon adoption of this standard.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2017-01: Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805) (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2017-01 on its financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2017-07: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (“ASU 2017-07”). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component of its net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs (“net benefit cost”) in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees during the period. Additionally, ASU 2017-07 only allows the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization into inventory. All other components of net benefit cost, which primarily include interest cost, expected return on assets and the annual mark-to-market liability remeasurement, are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside of income from operations. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Based on the non-service cost components of net benefit cost in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, gains of $13, losses of $29 and gains of $22, respectively, would be reclassified from “Operating income” to “Other non-operating income, net” upon adoption of this standard.

Newly Adopted Accounting Standards
In July 2015,June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2015-11: Simplifying theASU 2016-13: Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 820): Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330)Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, (“ASU 2015-11”2016-13”) as part of. The amendments in this update replace the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2015-11 replaces the existing concept of market value of inventory (where market was defined as replacement cost,incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a ceilingmethodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of net realizable valuea broader range of reasonable and floor of net realizable value less a normal profit margin)supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. New disclosures are also required with the single measurement of net realizable value.this standard. The guidance wasstandard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period.2019. This standard impacts the Company���s accounts receivables and contract assets. The Company adopted ASU 2015-11 as of2016-13 at January 1, 2017 and2020, using a modified retrospective adoption method. Under this method of this standard hadadoption, there is no impact to the comparative Consolidated Statement of Operations and the Consolidated Balance Sheets. There was an immaterial impact of adopting ASU 2016-13 on the Company’s financial statements.date of adoption.

In March 2016,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15: Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-07: Simplifyingfor Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract (“ASU 2018-15”). ASU 2018-15 align the Transitionrequirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to the Equity Method of Accounting(Topic 323) (“ASU 2016-07”) as part of the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2016-07 eliminates the requirement that when an existing investment qualifies for use of the equity method, an investor adjust the investment, results of operations and retained earnings retroactively as if the equity method has been in effect in all previous periods that the investment had been held. Under the new guidance, the equity method investordevelop or obtain internal-use software. The standard is only required to adopt the equity method as of the date the investment qualifies for the equity method, with no retrospective adjustment required. The guidance was effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016,2019. The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 prospectively on January 1, 2020 and the adoption had an immaterial impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Hexion Inc. | 73 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04: Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”). ASU 2020-04 will provide optional expedients and exceptions for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company has adopted ASU 2020-04 and the initial adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12: Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”). ASU 2019-12 will simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in income tax accounting and improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of income tax accounting by clarifying and amending existing guidance. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within that reporting period.those fiscal years. The Company adoptedis currently assessing the potential impact ASU 2016-072019-12 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14: Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (“ASU 2018-14”). ASU 2018-14 modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The standard is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2018-14 on its financial statements.
3. COVID-19 Impacts
In March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Around the world, local governments’ responses to COVID-19 continue to evolve, which has led to stay-at-home orders, social distancing guidelines and other preventative measures that have disrupted various industries in the global economy and the markets in which our products are manufactured, distributed and sold.
During this pandemic, the Company has implemented additional guidelines to further protect the health and safety of January 1, 2017its employees as the Company continues to operate with its suppliers and adoptioncustomers. The Company has maintained a focus on the safety of this standard had noits employees while minimizing potential disruptions caused by COVID-19. For example, the Company is following all legislatively-mandated travel directives in the various countries where it operates, and the Company has also put additional travel restrictions in place for its associates designed to reduce the risk from COVID-19. Additionally, the Company is utilizing extended work from home options to protect its office associates, while adjusting its meeting protocols and processes at its manufacturing sites.
The Company’s businesses have been designated by many governments as essential businesses and the Company’s operations have continued through December 31, 2020. While the Company has continued to operate during the pandemic, it did incur adverse financial impacts to its sales and profitability results during the year ended December 31, 2020 from COVID-19, primarily related to reduced volumes associated with the pandemic. The pandemic has impacted global economic conditions and lowered demand in many of the end use markets in which the Company operates such as automotive, aerospace, industrial products, oil and gas, construction and housing. The ultimate impact that COVID-19 will have on the Company’s future financial statements.position, operating results and cash flows involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity and duration of COVID-19 and actions to contain the virus or treat its impact.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (the “CARES”) Act was enacted on March 27, 2020 in the U.S. The CARES Act includes several significant provisions, such as delaying certain payroll tax payments, mandatory transition tax payments under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and estimated income tax payments. The Company does not currently expect the CARES Act to have a material impact on its financial results, including on its annual estimated effective tax rate but the Company delayed approximately $15 of certain income tax and non-income tax payments during 2020 and deferred an additional $5 of certain tax payments to future years. The Company continues to monitor and assess the CARES Act and similar legislation in the US and other jurisdictions where the Company operates which may impact the Company’s business and financial results.
In March 2016,Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-09: ImprovementsUnited States, and the global regions where the Company operates, continue to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718)be affected by COVID-19. The Company is closely monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of its businesses and geographies, including the impact on its facilities, employees, customers, suppliers, vendors, business partners and distribution.

4. Discontinued Operations
On September 27, 2020, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement for the sale of PSR, Hexamine and European-based Forest Products Resins businesses (together with PSR, the “Held for Sale Business” or the “Business”) to Black Diamond Capital Management, LLC and Investindustrial (the “Buyers”) for a purchase price of approximately $425. The consideration consists of $335 in cash and certain assumed liabilities with the remainder in future contingent proceeds based on the performance of the Held for Sale Business. The final purchase price is subject to customary post-closing adjustments. The Held for Sale Business was formerly included in the Company’s Adhesives reportable segment.

Hexion Inc. | 74 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Assets included in the transaction are the Company’s manufacturing sites in Barry, United Kingdom; Cowie, United Kingdom; Lantaron, Spain; Botlek, Netherlands; Iserlohn, Germany; Frielendorf, Germany; Solbiate, Italy; Kitee, Finland; Louisville, Kentucky; Acme, North Carolina; and the Company's 50% ownership interest in Hexion Schekinoazot Holding B.V. (the “Russia JV”), a joint venture that manufactures forest products resins in Russia.

The Held for Sale Business produces phenolic specialty resins and engineered thermoset molding compounds used in applications that require extreme heat resistance and strength, such as after-market automotive and original equipment manufacturing (“ASU 2016-09”OEM”) truck brake pads, filtration, aircraft components and foundry resins. The Business is also a significant producer of formaldehyde-based resins in Europe and merchant formaldehyde and formaldehyde derivatives in the Louisville and Acme plants, respectively. Formaldehyde-based resins, also known as forest products resins, are a key adhesive and binding ingredient used in the production of a wide variety of engineered lumber products, including medium density fiberboard (“MDF”), particleboard and oriented strand board (“OSB”). These products are used in a wide range of applications in the construction, remodeling and furniture industries. Merchant formaldehyde and formaldehyde derivatives are intermediate ingredients that are used in a variety of durable and industrial products. The Business generated annual sales of approximately $500 in 2020 and was historically reported within the Adhesives reportable segment. The sale is subject to customary closing conditions, including European Works Council consultation, and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2021.

Until the closing date, the Company has agreed to operate the Held for Sale Business in the ordinary course. The Company has agreed to provide certain transitional services to the Buyers for a limited period of time following the closing.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company reclassified the assets and liabilities of the Held for Sale Business as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and reported the results of the operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 as “(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amounts for prior periods have similarly been retrospectively reclassified for all periods presented.
The Held for Sale Business had $14 of goodwill at both December 31, 2020 and 2019, and $61 and $63 of other intangible assets at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Goodwill was allocated based on the relative fair value of the European-based Forest Products Resins businesses, included in the Held for Sale Business, which is part of the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2016-09 simplifies various aspects of share-based payment accounting, including the income tax consequences, classification of equity awards as either equity or liabilities and classificationCompany’s Forest Product Resins reporting unit. Other intangible assets were specifically identified based on the statement of cash flows. The guidance was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periodscustomer relationships within that reporting period. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2017 and adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.Forest Products Resins reporting unit that are associated with the Held for Sale Business.
In January 2017,As a result of entering into the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2017-04: SimplifyingPurchase Agreement, the Test for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350) (“ASU 2017-04”) as partCompany recognized a pre-tax charge of $75 within discontinued operations, representing the FASB simplification initiative. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, ASU 2017-04 eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, under the amendments in ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparingdifference between the fair value of the reporting unit with itsHeld for Sale Business, less costs to sell, and the carrying amount, which is Step 1value of net assets held for sale as of December 31, 2020. Fair value represents the expected net cash proceeds, excluding any future contingent proceeds, from the sale of the goodwill impairment test. An impairment charge should be recognizedHeld for Sale Business. The Company has made an accounting policy election to account for the amount by whichinitial and subsequent measurement of the carrying amount exceedsfuture contingent proceeds, of up to $90, as a gain contingency. Under this model, any future contingent consideration is not recognized until all future conditions are met and the reporting unit’sCompany has earned the proceeds. The contingent proceeds are based on performance targets of the Held for Sale Business over each of the next three years, as specified in the Purchase Agreement. Thus, for purposes of this impairment analysis the fair value of the future contingent proceeds was not to exceedconsidered in determination of the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The guidance is effective for goodwill impairment tests performed after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-04 during the third quarter 2017. See Note 5 for more information.
3. Restructuring and Business Realignment

2017 Restructuring Activities

In November 2017,disposal group impairment. Further, the Company initiated new restructuring actions withconcluded that the intent to optimize its cost structure. The Company expects these restructuring actions to generate a totalimpairment of $43 of incremental annual savings once fully implemented. The total one-time cash costs expected to be incurredthe Held for these restructuring activities are estimated at $28, consisting primarily of workforce reduction costs.Sale Business assets did not represent an impairment triggering event for the Company’s continuing operations.


The following table summarizes restructuring information by reporting segment:reconciles the carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations to total assets and liabilities of discontinued operations that are classified as held for sale in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Carrying amounts of major classes of assets held for sale:
Accounts receivable$66 $49 
Finished and in-process goods1821
Raw materials and supplies1718
Other current assets1211
Total current assets11399
Investment in unconsolidated entities
Deferred tax assets
Other long-term assets11 
Property, plant and equipment, net310 297 
Operating lease assets13 12 
Goodwill14 14 
Other intangible assets, net61 63 
Discontinued operations impairment(75)
Total long-term assets337400
Total assets held for sale$450 $499 
Hexion Inc. | 75 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins Forest Products Resins Corporate and Other Total
Total restructuring costs expected to be incurred$16
 $4
 $8
 $28
Restructuring costs incurred through December 31, 2017$12
 $5
 $3
 $20
       

Accrued liability at December 31, 2016$
 $
 $
 $
Restructuring charges12
 5
 3
 20
Payments(1) (2) 
 (3)
Accrued liability at December 31, 2017$11
 $3
 $3
 $17
Carrying amounts of major classes of liabilities held for sale:
Accounts payable$52 $52 
Income taxes payable
Accrued payroll
Current portion of operating lease liabilities
Other current liabilities10 
Total current liabilities67 69 
Long-term pension and post employment benefit obligations36 29 
Deferred income taxes22 15 
Operating lease liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
Total long-term liabilities71 56 
Total liabilities held for sale$138 $125 


OilfieldIn addition to the Held for Sale Business assets and liabilities classified as “held for sale” in the table above, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 also includes $1 of current assets held for sale, noncurrent assets held for sale of $5, current liabilities associated with assets held for sale of $3 and noncurrent liabilities associated with assets held for sale of $3. These additional assets and liabilities classified as “held for sale” at December 31, 2020 are related to the Company’s other restructuring activities.


The following table shows the financial results of discontinued operations for the periods presented:

SuccessorPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Major line items constituting pretax income of discontinued operations:
Net sales (1)
$493 $286 $309 $692 
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)(1)
412 245 263 600 
Selling, general and administrative expense42 15 17 34 
Depreciation and amortization26 17 19 
Asset impairments75 
Business realignment costs
Other operating expense (income), net(1)(1)
Operating (loss) income(65)20 38 
Reorganization items, net(135)
Other non-operating expense, net
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income tax, earnings from unconsolidated entities(70)155 38 
Income tax expense (benefit)21 
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax$(71)$$134 $29 
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of tax(1)
Net (loss) income attributable to discontinued operations$(69)$$135 $28 
(1)    The Held for Sale Business has included $4, $5, $2 and $9 in both “Net sales” and “Cost of sales” within the discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 and the Predecessor periods January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and year ended December 31, 2018, respectively, which represents sales from the Held for Sale Business to the Company’s continuing operations that were previously eliminated in consolidation. These reclassifications had no impact on “Net (loss) income” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for any of the periods presented.

Equity Method Investments

The Company's 50% ownership interest in the Russia JV, accounted for using the equity method of accounting, is included in the Held for Sale Business. Summarized financial data for the Russia JV are shown in the following tables:

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Current assets$$
Non-current assets
Current liabilities11 
Non-current liabilities12 
Hexion Inc. | 76 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
SuccessorPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
Net sales$32 $14 $18 $43 
Gross profit12 
Pre-tax income
Net income

5. Emergence from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy Petitions and Emergence from Chapter 11
    On the Petition Date, the Company, Hexion Holdings LLC, Hexion LLC and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions (the “Bankruptcy Petitions”) for reorganization under Chapter 11 (“Chapter 11”) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Chapter 11 proceedings were jointly administered under the caption In re Hexion TopCo, LLC, No. 19-10684 (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). The Debtors continued to operate their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court.
    On June 25, 2019, the Court entered an order (the “Confirmation Order”) confirming the Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Hexion Holdings LLC and its Debtor Affiliates under Chapter 11 (the “Plan”). On the morning of July 1, 2019, in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the Confirmation Order, the Plan became effective and the Debtors emerged from bankruptcy (the “Emergence”).
Debtor-in-Possession Financing
DIP Term Loan Facility
In connection with the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions, on April 3, 2019, the Company entered into a New York law-governed senior secured term loan agreement (the “DIP Term Loan Facility”), among Hexion LLC (“Holdings”), the Company, Hexion International Holdings B.V. (the “Dutch Borrower”), which was amended on April 17, 2019, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”), as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “Term Loan Agent”). The proceeds of the DIP Term Loan Facility were loaned by the Dutch Borrower to the Company pursuant to an intercompany loan agreement (the “Intercompany Loan Agreement”) and were used in part to repay in full the outstanding obligations under the Company’s existing asset-based revolving credit agreement ABL Facility (the “Predecessor ABL Facility”). As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $350 borrowings outstanding under DIP Term Loan Facility. The Company’s remaining obligations under the DIP Term Loan Facility were repaid in full and the DIP Term Loan Facility was terminated upon consummation of the Plan by the Company on July 1, 2019.
    DIPABL Facility
    In connection with the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions, on April 3, 2019, Holdings, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Borrowers”), the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan, as administrative agent, and JPMorgan, as collateral agent (the “DIP ABL Collateral Agent” and together with the DIP Term Loan Facility, the “ DIP Credit Facilities”), entered into an amended and restated senior secured debtor-in-possession asset-based revolving credit agreement, which was further amended on May 10, 2019 (the “DIP ABL Facility”), which amended and restated the Company’s Predecessor ABL Facility among Holdings, the Company, the Borrowers, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan, as administrative agent, and JPMorgan, as collateral agent. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the DIP ABL Facility and the DIP ABL Facility was terminated upon consummation of the Plan by the Company on July 1, 2019.
Restructuring Support Agreement
On April 1, 2019, the Debtors entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement (the “Support Agreement”) with equityholders that beneficially owned more than a majority of the Company’s outstanding equity (the “Consenting Sponsors”) and creditors that held more than a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of each of the Company’s 6.625% Notes and 10.00% Notes, (the “1L Notes”), 13.750% 1.5 lien notes due 2022 (the “1.5L Notes”), 9.00% second lien notes due 2020 (the “2L Notes”), 9.20% Debentures due 2021 and/or 7.875% Debentures due 2023 issued by Borden, Inc. (the “Unsecured Notes”) (the “Consenting Creditors” and, together with the Consenting Sponsors, the “Consenting Parties”). The Support Agreement incorporated the economic terms regarding a restructuring of the Debtors agreed to by the parties reflected in the Support Agreement. The restructuring transactions were effectuated through the Plan.

Hexion Inc. | 77 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Equity Backstop Agreement and Rights Offering
On April 25, 2019, the Debtors entered into the Equity Backstop Commitment Agreement, as subsequently amended (the “Equity Backstop”), among the Debtors and the equity backstop parties party thereto (the “Equity Backstop Parties”). The Equity Backstop provides that upon the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions, including the confirmation of the Plan, the Company will have the option to require the Equity Backstop Parties to backstop the common stock of the reorganized Company (the “New Common Stock”) that is not otherwise purchased in connection with the $300 rights offerings for New Common Stock of Hexion Holdings (the “Rights Offering”) to be made in connection with the Plan (the “Unsubscribed Shares”) on a several, and not joint and several, basis. In consideration for their commitment to purchase the Unsubscribed Shares, the Equity Backstop Parties will be paid a Premium of 8% of the Rights Offering Amount (the “Equity Backstop Premium”), which premium was earned in full upon entry of the Equity Backstop Approval Order and which is payable either in Cash or in New Common Equity at the option of each Equity Backstop Party. Pursuant to the terms of the Equity Backstop, the Equity Backstop Premium was deemed earned, nonrefundable and non-avoidable upon entry of the approval order by the Court. The Company incurred $24 for the Equity Backstop Premium, which is included in “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company paid the Equity Backstop Premium on the Effective Date in accordance with the Plan.
Debt Backstop Agreement
    On April 25, 2019, the Debtors entered into the Debt Backstop Commitment Agreement, as subsequently amended (the “Debt Backstop”), among the Debtors and the debt backstop parties party thereto (the “Debt Backstop Parties”). The Debt Backstop provides that upon satisfaction of certain terms and conditions, including the confirmation of the Plan, the Debt Backstop Parties will backstop the New Long-Term Debt on a several, and not joint and several, basis of an amount equal to such Debt Backstop Party’s commitment percentage, in exchange for (a) the Debt Backstop Premium of 3.375% of the backstop commitments thereunder payable either in Cash or in New Common Equity at the option of each Debt Backstop Party and (b) for certain Debt Backstop Parties, the Additional Debt Backstop Premium of 1.5% of the backstop commitments thereunder payable in Cash, both of which premiums (described in (a) and (b)) were earned in full upon entry of the Debt Backstop Approval Order. Pursuant to the terms of the Debt Backstop, the Backstop Commitment Premium was deemed earned, nonrefundable and non-avoidable upon entry of the approval order by the Court. The Company incurred $80 for the Backstop Commitment Premium, which is included in “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company paid the Debt Backstop Premium on the Effective Date in accordance with the Plan.

Pre-Petition Claims
On June 7, 2019, the Debtors filed schedules of assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs with the Court, which were amended on June 14, 2019. Prior to the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on the Effective Date, all pre-petition amounts were classified as “Liabilities subject to compromise” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019 and have either been settled or reinstated pursuant to the terms of the Plan. See Note 4 for more information.
    The Debt Instruments provide that as a result of the Bankruptcy Petitions the principal and interest due thereunder shall be immediately due and payable. Any efforts to enforce such payment obligations under the Debt Instruments are automatically stayed as a result of the Bankruptcy Petitions and the creditors’ rights of enforcement in respect of the Debt Instruments are subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Upon Emergence on July 1, 2019, these automatic stay provisions are no longer in effect.
Emergence from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
    On July 1, 2019, the Plan became effective and the Debtors emerged from the Chapter 11 proceedings.
    On or following the Effective Date, and pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the following occurred:
The restructuring of the Debtors’ pre-petition funded debt obligations with the proceeds of $1,658 in new long-term debt (“New Long-term Debt”) (see Note 12);
A $300 Rights Offering for new common equity of Hexion Holdings;
A percentage of the Rights Offering was issued in the form of warrants (“New Warrants”), these warrants represented 15% of the Rights Offering which are exercisable for shares of Common Stock, issued by Hexion Holdings under the Plan, and referred to as New Warrants under the Plan (together with New Common Stock, “Registrable Securities”);
Certain of the Debtors entered into the $350 ABL Facility (the “ABL Facility) (see Note 12) ;
General unsecured claims being paid in full or otherwise continuing unimpaired;
Holders of claims with respect to the 1L Notes received their pro rata share of (a) cash in the amount of $1.450 billion (less the sum of adequate protection payments paid on account of the 1L Notes during the Chapter 11 cases), (b) 72.5% of new common equity of Hexion Holdings (“New Common Equity”) (subject to the Agreed Dilution), and (c) 72.5% of the rights to purchase additional New Common Equity pursuant to the Rights Offering. The dilution of the New Common Equity (“the Agreed Dilution”) resulted from the Rights Offering and the Management Incentive Plan, as defined in the Plan. 10% of the fully-diluted equity of Hexion Holdings is to be reserved for grant to key members of management and independent, non-employee members of the Board of Directors, (see Note 14 for further details on the Management Incentive Plan);
Hexion Inc. | 78 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Holders of claims with respect to the 1.5L Notes, 2L Notes, and Unsecured Notes received their pro rata share of (a) 27.5% of the New Common Equity (subject to the Agreed Dilution) and (b) 27.5% of the rights to purchase additional New Common Equity pursuant to the Rights Offering;
Holders of equity interests (i.e., any class of equity securities) in TopCo received no distributions and all such Equity Interests being cancelled;
Reorganized Hexion issuing a $2.5 settlement note to the Consenting Sponsors; and
Appointment of a new board of directors.
    Cancellation of Prior Common Stock

In accordance with the Plan, each share of the Predecessor Company’s common stock outstanding prior to the Effective Date, including treasury stock, was canceled. Furthermore, all of the Company’s equity award agreements under prior incentive plans, and the awards granted pursuant thereto, were extinguished, canceled and discharged and have no further force or effect after the Effective Date. On the Effective Date, 100 new shares of common stock were issued at a par value of $0.01 to the Company’s new direct parent Hexion Intermediate in accordance with the Plan.
    Issuance of New Common Stock
    On the Effective Date, all previously issued and outstanding equity interests in TopCo were cancelled. Upon effectiveness of the Plan, Hexion Holdings issued 58,410,731 shares of a new class of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“New Common Stock”), pursuant to the Rights Offering. The shares of New Common Stock were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code, which generally exempts from such registration requirements the issuance of securities under a plan of reorganization.
New Warrant Agreement

    In addition, Hexion Holdings entered into a warrant agreement (the “Warrant Agreement”) and upon effectiveness of the Plan, Hexion Holdings issued 10,307,778 New Warrants as a part of the Rights Offering on the Effective Date. The New Warrants represented 15% of the Rights Offering which are exercisable to purchase shares of New Common Stock. These New Warrants may be exercised, at any time on or after the initial exercise date for exercise price per share of the New Common Stock of $0.01. The Warrant Agreement contains customary anti-dilution adjustments in the event of any stock split, reverse stock split, reclassification, stock dividend or other distributions.
    The holder or group of holders (the “Attribution Parties”) of New Warrants shall be permitted to exercise these New Warrants, at any time, in part or in whole, in amounts sufficient for the holder and Attribution Parties to maintain in the aggregate no less than the beneficial ownership limitation of 9.9% of the fully diluted shares outstanding. Fully diluted shares outstanding is calculated as (x) the aggregate number of shares of New Common Stock issued and outstanding plus (y) the aggregate number of shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of any other issued and outstanding securities or rights convertible into, or exchangeable for (in each case, directly or indirectly), common stock (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, any unexercised warrants or options to purchase common stock).

    The New Warrants do not entitle the holder or group of holders of the New Warrants to any voting rights, dividends or other rights as a shareholder of the Company prior to exercise of the held New Warrants. If any shares of common stock are listed on a trading market, Hexion Holdings shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the New Warrants shares issued upon exercise of these New Warrants to also be listed on such trading market, in accordance with the Warrant Agreement.

    Registration Rights Agreement

On the Effective Date, Hexion Holdings entered into a registration rights agreement with certain of its shareholders (the “Registration Rights Agreement”).

    Under the Registration Rights Agreement, upon delivery of a written notice by one or more shareholders holding, individually or in the aggregate, at least a majority of the outstanding Registrable Securities and New Warrants, voting together (as if such New Warrants had been exercised), Hexion Holdings is required to file a registration statement and effect an initial public offering and listing of its common stock, so long as the total offering size is at least $100 (a “Qualified IPO”).
    Hexion Holdings is also required to file a registration statement at any time following 180 days after the closing of a Qualified IPO upon the delivery of a written notice by one or more shareholders proposing to sell, individually or in the aggregate, at least $50 of Registrable Securities. In addition, under the Registration Rights Agreement, Hexion Holdings is required to file a shelf registration statement as soon as practicable following the closing of a Qualified IPO to register the resale, on a delayed or continuous basis, of all Registrable Securities that have been timely designated for inclusion by the holders (specified in the Registration Rights Agreement). Any individual holder or holders of our outstanding common stock party thereto can demand up to four “shelf takedowns” in any 12-month period which may be conducted in underwritten offerings so long as the total offering size is at least $50. Furthermore, each shareholder party to the Registration Rights Agreement has unlimited piggyback registration rights with respect to underwritten offerings, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.
Hexion Inc. | 79 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
    The foregoing registration rights are subject to certain cutback provisions and customary suspension/blackout provisions. Hexion Holdings has agreed to pay all registration expenses under the Registration Rights Agreement.

    Generally, “Registrable Securities” under the Registration Rights Agreement includes New Common Equity issued under the Plan, except that “Registrable Securities” does not include securities that have been sold under an effective registration statement or Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
6. Fresh Start Accounting
    Upon Emergence, the Company applied fresh start accounting, in accordance with ASC 852, to its financial statements because (i) the holders of existing voting shares of the Predecessor Company prior to its emergence received less than 50% of the voting shares of the Successor Company outstanding following its emergence from bankruptcy and (ii) the reorganization value of the Company’s assets immediately prior to confirmation of the plan of reorganization was less than the post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. Fresh start accounting was applied to the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon Emergence.
    Under the principles of fresh start accounting, a new reporting entity was created, and, as a result, the Company allocated the reorganization value of the Company to its individual assets based on their estimated fair values in conformity with ASC 805, “Business Combinations”. Reorganization value represents the fair value of the Successor Company’s assets before considering liabilities. The excess reorganization value over the fair value of identified tangible and intangible assets was reported as goodwill. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting and the effects of the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization, the consolidated financial statements after the Effective Date are not comparable with the consolidated financial statements as of or prior to that date.
Reorganization Value
    As set forth in the Plan of Reorganization and the Disclosure Statement filed with the Bankruptcy Court, the enterprise value of the Successor Company was estimated to be between $2,900 and $3,300 as of the Effective Date. Based on the estimates and assumptions discussed below, the Company estimated the enterprise value to be $3,100 for financial reporting purposes, which is the mid-point of the range of enterprise value per the Plan of Reorganization.
    The Company estimated the enterprise value of the Successor Company utilizing three valuation methods: a comparable public company analysis, a selected precedent transactions analysis, and a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method. The comparable public company analysis is based on the enterprise values of selected publicly traded diversified chemical companies with operating and financial characteristics comparable to the Company. Under this methodology, certain financial multiples that measure financial performance and value are calculated for each selected company and then applied to imply an estimated enterprise value of the Company.
    The selected precedent transaction analysis is based on the implied enterprise values of companies and assets involved in publicly disclosed merger and acquisition transactions which the targets had operating and financial characteristics comparable to certain respects of the Company. Under this methodology, a multiple is derived using the enterprise value of each such target, calculated as the consideration paid and the net debt assumed in the merger or acquisition transaction relative to a financial metric, in this case, EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) for the Company, for the last twelve month period which financial results have been publicly announced. Utilizing these multiples a reference range was created to imply an estimated enterprise value range.
    The DCF analysis is a forward-looking enterprise valuation methodology that estimates fair value by calculating the present value of expected future cash flows to be generated plus a present value of the estimated terminal value. The Company established a five year estimate of future cash flows based on the financial projections and assumptions utilized in the Company’s disclosure statement, which were derived from earnings forecasts and assumptions regarding growth and margin projections. A terminal value was included, and was calculated using the constant growth method based on the projected cash flows of the final year of the forecast period. While the Company considers such estimates and assumptions reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and, therefore, may not be realized. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may have a significant effect on the determination of the Company’s enterprise value. The assumptions used in the calculations for the DCF analysis included projected revenue, cost and cash flows representing the Company’s best estimates at the time the analysis was prepared. The DCF analysis has various complex considerations and judgments, including the discount rate and all of the other projections, etc. Due to the unobservable inputs to the valuation, the fair value would be considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
    The estimated enterprise value is not necessarily indicative of the actual value and the financial results; changes in the economy or the financial markets could result in a different enterprise value. The calculated enterprise value relies on all three of the methodologies listed above collectively. The actual value of the business is subject to certain uncertainties and contingencies that are difficult to predict and will fluctuate with changes in various factors affecting the financial conditions and prospects of such a business.
    The discount rate for each reporting unit was estimated based on an after-tax weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) reflecting the rate of return that would be expected by a market participant and ranged between approximately 11% and 19%. The WACC also takes into consideration a company-specific risk premium, reflecting the risk associated with the overall uncertainty of the financial projections used to estimate future cash flows.
Hexion Inc. | 80 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
The fair value of debt obligations represents $97 of debt payable within one year and $1,733 of long-term debt. The fair value of long-term debt was determined based on a market approach utilizing current market yields and was estimated to be approximately 100% of par value.
    The fair value of pension liabilities of $239 was determined based upon assumptions related to discount rates and expected return on assets, as well as certain other assumptions related to various demographic factors.
    The following table reconciles the enterprise value (including both continuing and discontinued operations) to the estimated reorganization value as of the Effective Date:
Enterprise value$3,100 
Plus: Total cash125 
Plus: Fair value of non-debt and non-pension liabilities
Current liabilities540 
Long-term liabilities527 
Total non-debt and non-pension liabilities1,067 
Reorganization value of Successor assets$4,292 
    The fair value of non-debt and non-pension liabilities represents the total liabilities, less debt payable within one year, long-term debt and pension obligations, of the Successor Company as of the Effective Date.



Hexion Inc. | 81 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
The following balance sheet illustrates the impacts of the implementation of the Plan and the application of fresh start accounting, which results in the opening balance sheet of the Successor Company. The Company has reclassified assets and liabilities of the Held for Sale Business and the results of discontinued operations in the table below.
As of July 1, 2019 (in millions, except share data)Predecessor Company
Reorganization Adjustments(a)
Fresh Start Adjustments(q)
Successor Company
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $15)96 $29 (b)$$125 
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $16 and $0, respectively)421 (r)427 
Inventories:
Finished and in-process goods221 27 (s)248 
Raw materials and supplies89 89 
Current assets held for sale132 2(aa)134
Other current assets56 (c)58 
Total current assets1,015 31 35 1,081 
Investment in unconsolidated entities20 (6)(t)14 
Deferred tax assets12 (d)(3)(u)
Other long-term assets34 (e)(1)(v)37 
Property and equipment:
Land69 11 (w)80 
Buildings228 (118)(w)110 
Machinery and equipment1,948 (837)(w)1,111 
2,245 (944)1,301 
Less accumulated depreciation(1,559)1,566 (w)
686 622 1,308 
Operating lease assets89 33 (x)122 
Goodwill83 — 81 (y)164 
Other intangible assets, net17 1,138 (z)1,155 
Noncurrent assets held for sale187 $215 (aa)$402 
Total assets$2,131 $47 $2,114 $4,292 
Liabilities and Deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$247 $49 (a)$$296 
Debt payable within one year438 (343)(f)(ab)97 
Interest payable(5)(g)
Income taxes payable11 (h)16 
Accrued payroll and incentive compensation32 32 
Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale69 1(aa)70 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities19 (x)25 
Financing fees payable104 (104)(i)
Other current liabilities101 (j)106 
Total current liabilities1,022 (387)644 
Long-term liabilities:
Liabilities subject to compromise3,664 (3,664)(k)
Long-term debt90 1,622 (l)21 (ab)1,733 
Long-term pension and post employment benefit obligations160 33 (a)39 (ac)232 
Deferred income taxes11 (m)148 (ad)160 
Operating lease liabilities70 17 (x)87 
Other long-term liabilities149 72 (n)(6)(r)215 
Noncurrent liabilities associated with assets held for sale46 20 (aa)66 
Total liabilities5,212 (2,323)248 3,137 
Hexion Inc. | 82 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
As of July 1, 2019 (in millions, except share data)Predecessor Company
Reorganization Adjustments(a)
Fresh Start Adjustments(q)
Successor Company
Equity (Deficit)
Common stock (Successor)— — (o)
Paid-in capital (Successor)— 1,156 (o)1,156 
Common stock (Predecessor)(1)(p)— — 
Paid-in capital (Predecessor)526 (526)(p)— 
Treasury stock (Predecessor), at cost—88,049,059 shares at December 31, 2018(296)296 (p)— 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(26)26 (ae)— 
Accumulated deficit(3,285)1,445 (p)1,840 (ae)— 
Total Hexion Inc. equity (deficit)(3,080)2,370 1,866 1,156 
Noncontrolling interest(1)(1)
Total equity (deficit)(3,081)2,370 (o)1,866 1,155 
Total liabilities and equity (deficit)$2,131 $47 $2,114 $4,292 
Reorganization Adjustments
(a)    The reorganization adjustments column reflects adjustments related to the consummation of the Plan, including the settlement of liabilities subject to compromise and related payments, other distributions of cash, issuance of new shares of common stock and the cancellation of the common equity of the Predecessor Company, as discussed in Note 5.
    The following is a calculation of the total pre-tax gain on the settlement of the liabilities subject to compromise:
Liabilities subject to compromise (“LSTC”) (see (k) below)$3,664 
Repayment of 1st Lien Notes(1,383)
Liabilities reinstated at emergence:
Accounts payable(49)
Pension and other post employment benefit obligations(33)
Other current liabilities(18)
Other long-term liabilities(32)
Total liabilities reinstated at emergence(132)
Fair value of equity issued in exchange for debt:
Fair value of equity(1,156)
Less: Proceeds from Rights Offering300 
Total fair value of equity issued in exchange for debt(856)
Gain on settlement of LSTC$1,293 
(b)    Reflects the net cash received as of the Effective Date from implementation of the Plan:
Sources:
Proceeds from the Rights Offerings$300 
Proceeds from the Senior Notes450 
Proceeds from the Senior Secured Term Loan1,196 
Release of utility deposit
Total sources1,947 
Uses:
Repayment of 1st Lien Notes(1,383)
Repayment of DIP Term Loan Facility(350)
Repayment of DIP Term Loan interest(5)
Debt and Equity Backstop premiums(104)
Financing fees(19)
Success fees at emergence(31)
Other professional fees(26)
Total uses(1,918)
Net cash received$29 
(c)    Represents $3 of excess professional fees due to the Company offset by $1 for the settlement of certain amounts owed during reorganization.
(d)    Reflects the adjustment to release the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets for certain non-U.S. subsidiaries which management believes more likely than not will be realized as a result of reorganization.
(e)    Reflects the adjustments to capitalize the ABL Facility financing fees incurred upon Emergence.
Hexion Inc. | 83 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
(f)    Reflects the adjustments made on the Effective Date to repay $350 in outstanding DIP Term Loans and to incur $7 for the current portion of the new Senior Secured Term Loan (see Note 12).
(g)    On the Effective Date, the Company repaid $5 of accrued unpaid interest on the DIP Term Loan Facility.
(h)    Reflects the adjustment to record income taxes payable as a result of reorganization.
(i)    On the Effective Date, the Company paid $24 of Equity Backstop premiums to the parties participating in the Rights Offering and $80 of Debt Backstop premiums. See Note 5 for more information.
(j)    Represents $18 of other current liabilities that were reclassified from “Liabilities subject to compromise” and $13 of other current liabilities incurred as a result of emergence offset by $26 of professional fees paid at emergence.
(k)    Liabilities subject to compromise represent unsecured liabilities incurred prior to the Petition Date. As a result of the Bankruptcy Petitions, actions to enforce or otherwise effect payment of pre-petition liabilities were generally stayed. These liabilities represent the amounts which have been allowed on known claims which were resolved through the Chapter 11 process, and have been approved by the Court as a result of the Confirmation Order.
    The following table summarizes pre-petition liabilities that are classified as “Liabilities subject to compromise” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
June 30, 2019
Debt$3,420 
Interest payable99 
Accounts payable49 
Environmental reserve43 
Pension and other post employment benefit obligations33 
Dividends payable to parent13 
Other
Total$3,664 
(l)    Represents the issuance of the new Senior Term Loan due 2026 of $1,208 and the new Senior Secured Notes due 2027 of $450 offset by $12 of debt discounts and $17 of debt issuance costs of which $7 is classified as “Debt due within one year” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The term loan and notes were recorded at estimated fair value, which was determined based on a market approach utilizing current yield.
(m)    Represents deferred tax activity associated with Emergence.
(n)    Reflects the adjustments made to reclassify $32 of other long-term liabilities from “Liabilities subject to compromise” and to record $40 of tax liability as a result of Emergence.
(o)     The following table reconciles the enterprise value to the estimated fair value of the Successor equity as of the Emergence Date:
Enterprise value$3,100 
Plus: Total cash125 
Less: Fair value of new debt(1,646)
Less: Fair value of remaining debt obligations(184)
Less: Pension obligations(239)
Fair value of equity1,156 
Plus: Fair value of noncontrolling interest
Fair value of Successor paid-in capital$1,157 
    At the Effective Date, 100 shares of Common Stock of Hexion Inc. held by new direct parent Hexion Intermediate were issued and outstanding at a par value of $0.01 per share.
(p)    Reflects the cumulative impact of the reorganization adjustments discussed above:
Continuing Operations
Gain on settlement of LSTC$1,293 
Success and other fees recognized at emergence(39)
Net gain on reorganization adjustments(1)
1,254 
Tax impact on reorganization adjustments(40)
Cancellation of Predecessor common stock
Cancellation of Predecessor additional paid-in capital526 
Cancellation of Predecessor treasury stock(296)
Net impact to Accumulated Deficit1,445 
(1)The net gain on reorganization adjustments has been included in “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Hexion Inc. | 84 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Fresh Start Adjustments
(q)    The Fresh Start Adjustments column reflects adjustments required to record the assets and liabilities of the Company at fair value, including the elimination of the accumulated deficit and accumulated other comprehensive (loss) of the Predecessor Company.
(r)    Reflects the adjustments made to Predecessor deferred revenue in situations where it has been determined the Successor Company has no remaining legal performance obligation related to the arrangement that give rise to the deferred revenue for the Predecessor Company.
(s)    Reflects the adjustment made to record finished goods inventory at its estimated fair value, which was determined based on the current acquisition cost, including disposal and holding period costs and a reasonable profit margin less costs to sell.
(t)    Reflects the adjustments made to record the Predecessor Company’s investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries at fair value utilizing a cost approach method.
(u)    Reflects the deferred tax asset impact of the fresh start adjustments, resulting primarily from the book adjustment made to foreign property, plant, and equipment and intangibles that increased the future taxable temporary differences recorded.
(v)    Reflects the adjustments required to record the Predecessor Company’s long-term assets at fair value.
(w)    Reflects the adjustments made to record property, plant and equipment at its estimated fair value and eliminate Predecessor accumulated depreciation. Depreciable lives were also revised to reflect the remaining estimated useful lives of the related property, plant and equipment, which range from 1 to 39 years. Fair value was determined as follows:
The market, sales comparison or trended cost approach was utilized to estimate fair value for land and buildings. This approach relies upon recent sales, offerings of similar assets or a specific inflationary adjustment to original purchase price to arrive at a probable selling price.
The cost approach was utilized to estimate fair value for machinery and equipment. This approach considers the amount required to construct or purchase a new asset of equal utility at current market prices, with adjustments in value for physical deterioration and functional and economic obsolescence. Physical deterioration is an adjustment made in the cost approach to reflect the real operating age of an asset with regard to wear and tear, decay and deterioration that is not prevented by maintenance. Functional obsolescence is an adjustment made to reflect the loss in value or usefulness of an asset caused by inefficiencies or inadequacies of the asset, as compared to a more efficient or less costly replacement asset with newer technology. Economic obsolescence is an adjustment made to reflect the loss in value or usefulness of an asset due to factors external to the asset, such as the economics of the industry, reduced demand, increased competition or similar factors.
    Depreciable lives were revised to reflect the remaining estimated useful lives as follows (in years):
Buildings9 to 39 years
Machinery and equipment1 to 20 years
(x)    Reflects $24 of adjustments made to bring the right-of-use operating leased assets, exclusive of $1 related to the Held of Sale Business, and their associated liabilities to fair value utilizing an average discount rate of approximately 6% and to record favorable leasehold interests of $9, exclusive of $5 related to the Held for Sale Business, which were valued using a rental analysis approach based on (i) fair market rent was determined based on rates for facilities comparable to the Company’s properties, (ii) discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 12.0%, which were based on the after-tax WACC; and (iii) market rental growth rates ranging from 0.0% to 5.0%.
(y)    Reflects the adjustments made to record the elimination of the Predecessor goodwill balance of $83, exclusive of $25 related to the Held for Sale Business, and to record the Successor goodwill of $164, exclusive of $14 related to the Held for Sale Business, which represents the reorganization value of assets in excess of amounts allocated to identified tangible and intangible assets.
(z)    Reflects the adjustments made to eliminate the Predecessor Company’s other intangible assets of $17, exclusive of $7 related to the Held for Sale Business, and to record $1,155, exclusive of $64 related to the Held for Sale Business, in estimated fair value of Successor other intangible assets. Fair value was comprised of the following:
Customer related intangible assets of $904, exclusive of $64 related to the Held for Sale Business, were valued using the multi-period excess earnings income approach based on the following significant assumptions;
i.Forecasted net sales and profit margins attributable to the current customer base through the applicable economic useful life;
ii.Attrition rates ranging from 0.5% to 5.0%;
iii.Discount rates ranging from 13.0% to 17.5%, which were based on the after-tax WACC; and
iv.Economic lives of 20 to 25 years.

Trademarks of $141 were valued using the relief from royalty income approach based on the following significant assumptions:
i.Forecasted net sales attributable to the trademarks through the applicable economic useful life;
ii.Royalty rates ranging from 0.2% to 2.0% of expected net sales determined with regard to comparable market transactions and profitability analysis;
iii.Discount rates ranging from 11.0% to 16.5%, which were based on the after-tax weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”); and
Hexion Inc. | 85 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
iv.Economic lives ranging from 15 to 20 years.
Technology based intangible assets of $110 were valued used the relief from royalty income approach based on the following significant assumptions:
i.Forecasted net sales attributable to the respective technologies through the applicable economic useful life;
ii.Royalty rates ranging from 0.5% to 2.25% of expected net sales determined with regard to expected cash flows of respective technologies and the overall importance of respective technologies to product offering
iii.Discount rates ranging from 11.0% to 16.5%, which were based on the after-tax WACC; and
iv.Economic lives of 15 years.
(aa)     Reflects the fresh start accounting adjustments related to the Held for Sale business:
Discontinued Operations
Finished and in-process goods$
Total current assets held for sale2
Investment in unconsolidated companies3
Deferred tax assets(1)
Other long-term assets3
Property and equipment, net158
Operating lease assets (See endnote X)6
Goodwill (See endnote Y)(11)
Other intangible assets (See endnote Z)57 
Total noncurrent assets held for sale215
Current portion of operating lease liabilities (See endnote X)1
Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale1
Long-term pension and post employment benefit obligations5
Deferred income taxes15
Noncurrent liabilities associated with assets held for sale20
(ab)    Reflects the adjustments made to bring various sale-leaseback financing arrangements to fair value and to revalue debt obligations.
(ac)    Reflects the remeasurement of the Predecessor Company’s pension liabilities. The increase in pension liabilities was driven by reductions in discount rates and changes in other actuarial assumptions as of the Effective Date, primarily impacting our unfunded German pension plans.
(ad)    Represents the deferred tax liability impact of the fresh start adjustments, resulting primarily from the book adjustment made to foreign property, plant, and equipment and intangibles that increased the future taxable temporary differences recorded.
(ae)    Reflects the cumulative impact of the fresh start accounting adjustments discussed above and the elimination of the Predecessor Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income:
Continuing OperationsDiscontinued OperationsTotal Hexion
Establishment of Successor goodwill$164 $14 $178 
Elimination of Predecessor goodwill(83)(25)(108)
Establishment of Successor other intangible assets1,155 64 1,219 
Elimination of Predecessor other intangible assets(17)(7)(24)
Inventory fair value adjustments27 29 
Property, plant and equipment fair value adjustment622 158 780 
Pension liability fair value adjustment(39)(5)(44)
Other assets and liabilities fair value adjustment(8)11 
Elimination of Predecessor Company accumulated other comprehensive income51 (77)(26)
Net gain on fresh start adjustments(1)
1,872 135 2,007 
Tax impact on fresh start adjustments(151)(16)(167)
Net impact on accumulated deficit1,721 119 1,840 
(1)The net gain on fresh start adjustments has been included in “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Hexion Inc. | 86 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
7. Reorganization Items, Net
    Incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Bankruptcy Petitions, gains on the settlement of liabilities under the Plan and the net impact of fresh start accounting adjustments are classified as “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table summarizes reorganization items:
 January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019
Continuing OperationsDiscontinued Operations
Net gain on reorganization adjustments (see Note 6)$(1,254)$
Net gain on fresh start adjustments (see Note 6)(1,872)(135)
Financing fees104 
Professional fees39 
DIP ABL Facility fees13 
Total$(2,970)$(135)
8. Asset Impairments
During the thirdfirst quarter of 2017,2020, the Company indefinitely idled certain assets within its Adhesives segment. These represented triggering events resulting in impairment evaluations of the fixed assets within both the oilfield and phenolic specialty resins asset groups. As a result, asset impairments totaling $16 were recorded in “Asset impairments” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2020. See Note 4 for discussion of the discontinued operations impairment charge recorded in 2020.
During the first quarter of 2018, the Company indefinitely idled an oilfield manufacturing facility within its Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating ResinsAdhesives segment, and production was ceased at this facility.shifted to another facility within the oilfield manufacturing group. This represented a triggering event resulting in an impairment evaluation of the fixed and intangible assets within the U.S. oilfield asset group. As a result, an asset impairment of $20 was recorded in the estimated useful livesfirst quarter of certain long-lived assets2018 related to this facility were shortened, and consequently,the fixed assets at the idled manufacturing facility. In addition, the remaining U.S. oilfield asset group was evaluated for impairment utilizing a discounted cash flow approach, resulting in an additional impairment of $5 that was recorded during the first quarter of 2018 related to an existing customer relationship intangible asset. Overall, the Company incurred $14$25 of accelerated depreciationtotal impairment related to these assets, which is included in “Cost of sales” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.


In addition, during the third quarter of 2016, the Company indefinitely idled two oilfield manufacturing facilities within its Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins segment, and production was ceased at these facilities. As a result, the estimated useful lives of certain long-lived assets related to these facilities were shortened, and consequently, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred $21 of accelerated depreciation related to these assets, which is included in “Cost of sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Norco

In the first quarter of 2016, the Company announced a planned rationalization at its Norco, LA manufacturing facility within its Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins segment, and production was ceased at this facility during the second quarter of 2016. As a result of this facility rationalization, the Company recorded one-time costs in 2016 related to the early termination of certain contracts for utilities, site services, raw materials and other items. The Company also recorded a conditional asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) in 2016 related to certain contractually obligated future demolition, decontamination and repair costs associated with this facility rationalization. The Company does not expect to incur any additional contract termination or ARO charges related to this facility rationalization.

The table below summarizes the changes in the liabilities recorded related to contract termination costs and ARO from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017, all of which are included in “Other current liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 Contract Termination Costs Asset Retirement Obligation Total
Accrued liability at December 31, 2016$18
 $13
 $31
Activity(1)
(18) (13) (31)
Accrued liability at December 31, 2017$
 $
 $

(1)
These amounts include approximately $30 of cash payments during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and $1 of these amounts are included in “Accounts payable” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017.

As a result of the Norco, LA facility rationalization, the estimated useful lives of certain long-lived assets related to this facility were shortened, and consequently, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred $76 of accelerated depreciation related to these assets, which is included in “Cost of sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. These assets were fully depreciated in the second quarter of 2016. In addition, at June 30, 2016 the Company recorded a conditional ARO of $30 related to certain contractually obligated future demolition, decontamination and repair costs associated with this facility rationalization. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an additional $30 of accelerated depreciation related to this ARO, which is also included in “Cost of sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, rendering this item fully depreciated as of June 30, 2016. In the third quarter of 2016, this ARO liability was reduced by $11 as a result of revised cost estimates, primarily due to a reduction in the scope of expected future demolition. This $11 reduction in costs is included in “Business realignment costs”“Asset impairments” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2016.2018.

During9. Related Party Transactions
Transactions with Apollo
    As of the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy on July 1, 2019, Apollo is no longer a related party to the Company. The disclosures below are through July 1, 2019 and only reflect the time period when Apollo was a related party. Sales to various Apollo affiliates were $1 and $2 for the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2018. There were no purchases during the Company incurred additional costs of less than $3 related to other ongoing site closure expenses related to this facility rationalization, which are included in “Business realignment costs” inPredecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and for the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred costs of $24 related to the early termination of certain contracts for utilities, site services, raw materials and other items related to this facility rationalization and $16 related to abnormal production overhead, severance and other expenses to the facility closure. All of these costs are included in “Business realignment costs” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.2018.
4. Related Party Transactions
Administrative Service, Management and Consulting ArrangementAgreement
The Company is subjectwas party to a Management Consulting Agreement with Apollo (the “Management Consulting Agreement”) that renews on an annual basis, unless noticepursuant to the contrary is given by either party. Under the Management Consulting Agreement,which the Company receivesreceived certain structuring and advisory services from Apollo and its affiliates. The Management Consulting Agreement provides indemnification to Apollo its affiliates and their directors, officers and representatives for potential losses arising from these services. Apollo iswas entitled to an annual fee equal to the greater of $3 or 2% of the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA. In conjunction with the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings and the Support Agreement filed on April 1, 2019, Apollo electedagreed to waive charges of any portion of theits annual management fee due in excess of $3 for 2019. In connection with the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
During each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized expense underCompany’s emergence from Chapter 11, the Management Consulting Agreement was terminated pursuant to the Confirmation Order, as of $3. This amount is included in “Other operating expense, net” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Effective Date.
Transactions with MPM
    As of May 15, 2019, MPM was no longer under the common control of Apollo and, accordingly, is no longer a related party to the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company sold less than $1 of products to MPM. There were no products sold to MPM during the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019. During the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company earned less than $1 from MPM as compensation for acting as distributor of products and had purchases of $10 and $32, respectively.
Hexion Inc. | 87 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Shared Services Agreement
On October 1, 2010, theThe Company entered intopreviously held a shared services agreement with Momentive Performance Materials Inc. (‘MPM”) (which, from October 1, 2010 through October 24, 2014, was a subsidiary of Hexion Holdings), as amended in October 2014MPM (the “Shared Services Agreement”). Under this agreement, the Company providesprovided to MPM, and MPM providesprovided to the Company, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, legal and procurement services. The Shared Services Agreement establishes certain criteria upon which the costs of such services are allocated between the Company and MPM. The Shared Services Agreement was renewed for one year starting October 2017 and is subject to termination by either the Company orOn March 14, 2019, MPM without cause, on not less than 30 days’ written notice, and expires in October 2018 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter; absent contrary notice from either party). The Company periodically reviews the scope of services provided under this agreement.
Pursuant toterminated the Shared Services Agreement, duringwhich triggered a transition period for the yearsparties to work together to facilitate an orderly transition of services. The transition of services was completed on September 1, 2020. During the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,2018, the Company incurred approximately $48, $63$15 and $70,$28, respectively, of net costs for shared services and MPM incurred approximately $38, $50$14 and $60, respectively,$21 of net costs for shared services. Included in the net costs incurred during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015, were net billings from the Company to MPM of $26, $30 and $35, respectively, to bring the percentage of total net incurred costs for shared services under the Shared Services Agreement to the applicable allocation percentage. The allocation percentage for 2017 and 2016 was 56% for the Company and 44% for MPM. The scope of services and allocation percentages are reviewed by the Steering Committee pursuant to the terms of the Shared Services Agreement. The Company had accounts receivable from MPM of $3 and $5 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and no accounts payable to MPM.
Sales and Purchases of Products and Services with MPM
The Company also sells products to, and purchases products from, MPM. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company sold less than $1, less than $1 and $1, respectively, of products to MPM and purchased $24, $27 and $31, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company earned $1 from MPM as compensation for acting as distributor of products. The Company had no accounts receivable from MPM as of December 31, 2017 and less than $1 as of December 31, 2016, and $2 of accounts payable to MPM as of both December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to these agreements.
Purchases and Sales of Products and Services with Affiliates Other than MPM
The Company sells products to various Apollo affiliates other than MPM. These sales were $4, $6 and $59 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accounts receivable from these affiliates were less than $1 at both December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company also purchases raw materials and services from various Apollo affiliates other than MPM. There were no purchases for the year ended December 31, 20172018 were net billings from Hexion to MPM of $11 and purchases of less than $1 and $3 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,$14, respectively. The Company had no accounts payable to these affiliates at December 31, 2017 and accounts payable of less than $1 at December 31, 2016.
Participation of Apollo Global Securities in Refinancing Transactions
In April 2015, Apollo Global Securities, LLC (“AGS”), an affiliate of Apollo, acted as one of the initial purchasers and received less than $1 in connection with the sale of the $315 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 10.00% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020.
Other Transactions and Arrangements
In March 2020, the Company entered into a $10 short term affiliate loan with its Parent at a 0% interest rate to fund Parent share repurchases. In June 2020, the Company made a $10 non-cash distribution to its Parent treated as a return of capital to settle this affiliate loan. The Company made an additional $3 return of capital distribution to its Parent to fund additional Parent share repurchases in December 2020. This return of capital reduced “Paid-in capital” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2020.
The Company sells products and provides services to, and purchases products from, its other joint ventures which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Refer to the below table for a summary of the sales and purchases with the Company and its joint ventures which are recorded under the equity method of accounting. Theseaccounting:
 SuccessorPredecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
Sales to joint ventures(1)(2)
$$$$
Purchases from joint ventures(2)
(1)Sales to joint ventures includes sales were $17, $43,to the Russia JV of $1, $1, $1, and $105$7 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015, respectively.the year ended December 31, 2018, which are included in the Held for Sale Business.
(2)There were no sales to joint ventures or purchases from joint ventures for the Predecessor period July 1, 2019.
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Accounts receivable from joint ventures(1)
$ <1$
Accounts payable to joint ventures<1
(1)    Accounts receivable from these joint ventures were $6 and $7 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These purchases were $14, $17, and $49is mostly comprised of receivables from the Russia JV included in the Held for Sale Business. Accounts receivable from the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company had accounts payable to theseCompany’s other joint ventures ofwas less than $1 atfor both December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
The Company had a loan receivable of $6 and royalties receivable of $1 and $2 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, from its unconsolidated forest products joint venture in Russia. Note that these royalties receivable are also included inIn addition to the accounts receivable from joint ventures disclosed above.above, the Company had a loan receivable of $4and $7as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, from the Russia JV. This loan receivable has been included in “Long-term assets held for sale” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

5.10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In connection with the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 and application of fresh start accounting, the excess of reorganization value over the fair value of identified tangible and intangible assets of $178 was recorded as goodwill as of July 1, 2019. The Company’s gross carrying amount and accumulated impairments of goodwill consist of the following as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
 20202019
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Impairments
Accumulated
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Net
Book
Value
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Impairments
Accumulated
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Net
Book
Value
Adhesives(1)
$127 $$$127 $127 $$$127 
Coatings and Composites37 37 37 37 
Total$164 $$$164 $164 $$$164 
(1)Excludes $14 of goodwill in the Adhesives segment associated with the Held for Sale Business at both December 31, 2020 and 2019 (See Note 4).
Hexion Inc. | 88 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 2017 2016
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Impairments
 
Accumulated
Foreign
Currency
Translation
 
Net
Book
Value
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Impairments
 
Accumulated
Foreign
Currency
Translation
 
Net
Book
Value
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$111
 $(70) $1
 $42
 $111
 $(57) $
 $54
Forest Products Resins81
 
 (10) 71
 81
 
 (14) 67
Total$192
 $(70) $(9) $113
 $192
 $(57) $(14) $121
The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 are as follows:
 
Adhesives(3)
Coatings and CompositesTotal
Predecessor
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2018$43 $41 $84 
Divestitures
Foreign currency translation(1)(1)
Goodwill balance at June 30, 201942 41 83 
Elimination of Predecessor Goodwill(42)(41)(83)
Goodwill balance at July 1, 2019
Recording of Successor Goodwill(1)
127 37 164 
Successor
Goodwill balance at July 2, 2019$127 $37 $164 
Adjustments(2)
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2019$127 $37 $164 
Adjustments(2)
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2020$127 $37 $164 
 Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins Forest Products Resins Total
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2015$54
 $68
 $122
Foreign currency translation


 (1) (1)
Goodwill balance at December 31, 201654
 67
 121
Goodwill impairment(13) 
 (13)
Foreign currency translation1
 4
 5
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2017 (1)
$42
 $71
 $113
(1)
Includes $1(1)Recording of goodwill related to the ATG Business, within the Forest Products Resins segment, included in “Long-term assets held for sale” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In 2017, the Successor Company lowered its forecastgoodwill in accordance with the application of estimated earningsfresh start accounting. Refer to Note 6 for more details.
(2)There were no foreign currency adjustments nor impairments related to Successor Company goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2020 and cash flows for its oilfield business from those previously projected,the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019.
(3)Excludes $14 at both December 31, 2020 and indefinitely idled a manufacturing facility within its oilfield business. This was due to the slower than previously assumed recovery2019 and $25 at both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 related in the oil and gas market. As of September 30, 2017, the estimated fair value of the Company’s oilfield reporting unit was less than the carrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit. In estimating the fair value of the oilfield reporting unit, the Company relied solely on a discounted cash flow model income approach. This was due to the Company’s belief that the reporting unit’s EBITDA, a key input under the market approach, was not representative and consistent with the reporting unit’s historical performance and long-term outlook and, therefore, was not consistent with assumptions that a market participant would use in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. When the fair value of the reporting unit was determined, an impairment charge was recognizedHeld for the amount by which the carrying amount of oilfield’s net assets exceeded its fair value. As such, the entire oilfield reporting unit’s goodwill balance of $13 was impaired during the third quarter of 2017, and the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $13 in its Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins segment, which is included in “Asset impairments” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Significant unobservable inputs in the discounted cash flow analysis included projected long-term future cash flows, projected growth rates and discount rates associated with this reporting unit. Future projected long-term cash flows and growth rates were derived from models based upon forecasts prepared by the Company’s management. These projected cash flows were discounted using a rate of 13.5%Sale Business (See Note 4).
The Company’s intangible assets with identifiable useful lives consist of the following as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated Foreign ExchangeAccumulated
Amortization
Net
Book
Value
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated Foreign ExchangeAccumulated
Amortization
Net
Book
Value
20202019
Customer relationships(1)
$903 $$(61)$847 $903 $(3)$(19)$881 
Trademarks141 (12)131 141 (3)138 
Technology110 (11)101 110 (4)106 
Total$1,154 $$(84)$1,079 $1,154 $(3)$(26)$1,125 
 2017 2016
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated Impairments 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated Impairments 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
Patents and technology$112
 $
 $(97) $15
 $112
 $
 $(91) $21
Customer lists and contracts109
 (17) (79) 13
 109
 (17) (75) 17
Other25
 
 (11) 14
 25
 
 (11) 14
Total$246
 $(17) $(187) $42
 $246
 $(17) $(177) $52

The impact(1)Excludes net book value of foreign currency translation on$61 and $63 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, related to the Held of Sale Business (See Note 4).
On July 1, 2019, as part of the application of fresh start accounting, the Company’s existing intangible assets is included in accumulated amortization.were eliminated and new intangible assets were established at their estimated fair value as of July 1, 2019. New intangible assets were established for customer relationships, trademarks, and technology. See Note 6for more information.

Total intangible amortization expense related to continuing operations for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015the year ended December 31, 2018 was $12, $12$58, $26, $3 and $13,$9, respectively.
Estimated annual intangible amortization expense for 20182021 through 20222025 is as follows:
2021$58 
202258 
202358 
202458 
202558 

Hexion Inc. | 89 | 2020 Form 10-K
2018 $15
2019 6
2020 6
2021 2
2022 2

Table of Contents
6.11. Fair Value
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value measurement provisions establish a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. This guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. For example, inputs derived through extrapolation or interpolation that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had derivative liabilities related to foreign exchange, electricity and natural gas contracts of less than $1, which were measured using Level 2 inputs, and consist of derivative instruments transacted primarily in over-the-counter markets. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 measurements during the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2016.the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Company calculates the fair value of its Level 2 derivative liabilities using standard pricing models with market-based inputs, adjusted for nonperformance risk. When its financial instruments are in a liability position, the Company evaluates its credit risk as a component of fair value. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, no adjustment was made by the Company to reduce its derivative liabilities for nonperformance risk.
When its financial instruments are in an asset position, the Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by other parties to these contracts and evaluates their credit risk as a component of fair value.

Interest Rate Swap
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements    The Company will from time to time use interest rate swaps to alter interest rate exposures between floating and fixed rates on certain long-term debt. Under interest rate swaps, the Company agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest amounts calculated using an agreed-upon notional principal amount. The counter-parties to the interest rate swap agreements are financial institutions with investment grade ratings.
Long-LivedOn October 10, 2019, the Company executed an interest rate swap syndication agreement with Credit Suisse International where Hexion receives a variable 3-month LIBOR, and Amortizable Intangible Assets
Followingpays fixed interest rate swaps, beginning January 1, 2020 through January 1, 2025 (the “Hedge”) for a total notional amount of $300. The purpose of this arrangement is a summaryto hedge the variability caused by quarterly changes in cash flow due to associated changes in LIBOR for $300 of lossesthe Company’s variable rate Senior Secured Term Loan denominated in USD ($701 at December 31, 2020.) The Company has evaluated this transaction and designated this derivative instrument as a resultcash flow hedge for hedge accounting under Accounting Standard Codification, No. 815, “Derivatives and hedging,” (“ASC 815”). For the Hedge, the Company recorded changes in the fair value of the Company measuring long-lived assets atderivative in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and will subsequently reclassify gains and losses from these changes in fair value onfrom OCI to the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the same period that the hedged transaction affects net (loss) income and in the same Consolidated Statement of Operations category as the hedged item, “Interest expense, net”.
The following tables summarize the Company’s derivative financial instrument designated as a non-recurring basis duringhedging instrument:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Balance Sheet LocationNotional AmountFair Value LiabilityNotional AmountFair Value Asset
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Interest Rate SwapOther current (liabilities)/assets$300 $(15)$300 $
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments$(15)$
Amount of (Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI on Derivatives, net of tax
SuccessorPredecessor
Derivatives designated as hedging instrumentsYear ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019
Interest Rate Swaps
Interest Rate Swap$(18)$$
Total$(18)$$
    During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017,
2016 and 2015, all2020, the Company reclassified a loss of which were valued using Level 3 inputs.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Long-lived assets held and used $
 $
 $4
Long-lived assets held for disposal/abandonment 
 
 2
Total $
 $
 $6
In 2015, as$2 from OCI to “Interest expense, net” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations related to the settlement of a resultportion of the likelihood that certain long-lived assets would be disposedHedge.
Hexion Inc. | 90 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of before the end of their estimated useful lives resulting in lower future cash flows associated with these assets, the Company wrote down long-lived assets with a carrying value of $5 to fair value of $1, resulting in an impairment charge of $4 within its Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins segment.Contents
In 2015, as a result of the Company’s decision to dispose of certain long-lived assets before the end of their estimated useful lives, the Company wrote down long-lived assets with a carrying value of $2 to fair value of $0, resulting in an impairment charge of $2 within its Forest Products Resins segment.


Non-derivative Financial Instruments
The following table summarizes the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s non-derivative financial instruments:
  
Carrying Amount(1)
 Fair Value
   Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
December 31, 2017          
Debt $3,750
 $
 $3,206
 $49
 $3,255
December 31, 2016          
Debt $3,542
 $
 $3,134
 $9
 $3,143
(1)Debt carrying amounts exclude unamortized deferred debt issuance costs of $41 and $38 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 Carrying AmountFair Value
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
December 31, 2020
Debt$1,792 $$1,767 $55 $1,822 
December 31, 2019
Debt$1,785 $$1,751 $64 $1,815 
Fair values of debt classified as Level 2 are determined based on other similar financial instruments, or based upon interest rates that are currently available to the Company for the issuance of debt with similar terms and maturities. Level 3 amounts represent capital leases whose fair value is determined through the use of present value and specific contract terms. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities are considered reasonable estimates of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments.
7.12. Debt and Lease Obligations
Debt outstanding at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 is as follows:
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 Long-TermDue Within One YearLong-TermDue Within One Year
Senior Secured Credit Facility:
ABL Facility$$$$
Senior Secured Term Loan - USD due 2026 (includes $6 and $7 of unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively)701 708 
Senior Secured Term Loan - EUR due 2026 (includes $4 of unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2020 and 2019)515 473 
Senior Notes:
7.875% Senior Notes due 2027450 450 
Other Borrowings:
Australia Facility due 2021 at 4.0% and 3.9% at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively30 27 
Brazilian bank loans at 10.2% and 9.2% at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively22 34 
Lease obligations(1)
42 14 50 14 
Other at 3.9% and 5.0% at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively11 
Total(2)
$1,710 $82 $1,715 $70 
  2017 2016
  Long-Term Due Within One Year Long-Term Due Within One Year
ABL Facility $81
 $
 $
 $
Senior Secured Notes:        
6.625% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (includes $2 and $3 of unamortized debt premium at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)
 1,552
 
 1,553
 
10.00% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 315
 
 315
 
10.375% First-Priority Secured Notes due 2022 560
 
 
 
8.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 (includes $1 of unamortized discount at December 31, 2016) 
 
 706
 
13.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2022 225
 
 
 
9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 574
 
 574
 
Debentures:        
9.2% debentures due 2021 74
 
 74
 
7.875% debentures due 2023 189
 
 189
 
Other Borrowings:        
Australia Facility due 2018 at 4.6% and 4.1% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively 
 50
 
 51
Brazilian bank loans at 9.9% and 11.2% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively 9
 34
 14
 26
Lease obligations 44
 5
 7
 2
Other at 5.0% and 5.1% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively 2
 36
 3
 28
Unamortized debt issuance costs (41) 
 (38) 
Total $3,584
 $125
 $3,397
 $107
(1)Lease obligations include finance leases and sale leaseback financing arrangements.
2017 Refinancing Transactions
In February 2017, the Company issued $485 aggregate principal amount of 10.375% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “New First Lien Notes”) and $225 aggregate principal amount of 13.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “New Senior Secured Notes”). Upon the closing of these offerings, the Company used the net proceeds from these offerings, together with cash on its balance sheet, to redeem all(2)The foreign exchange translation impact of the Company’s outstanding 8.875% Senior Securedforeign currency denominated debt instruments was an increase of $46 and a decrease of $10 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

    In consummation of the Plan, on July 1, 2019, the 1L Note holders received their pro rata share of (a) cash in the amount of $1.450 billion (less the sum of adequate protection payments paid on account of the 1L Notes due 2018 (the “Old Senior Secured Notes”)during the Chapter 11 cases), which occurred in March 2017. (b) 72.5% of new common equity of Hexion Holdings (“New Common Equity”) (subject to the Agreed Dilution), and (c) 72.5% of the rights to purchase additional New Common Equity pursuant to the Rights Offering.    
    Additionally, the owners of the 1.5L Notes, 2L Notes, and Unsecured Notes received their pro rata share of (a) 27.5% of the New Common Equity (subject to the Agreed Dilution) and (b) 27.5% of the rights to purchase additional New Common Equity pursuant to the Rights Offering. See Note 5 for more information.
In connection with the extinguishmentfiling of the Old Senior Secured Notes,Bankruptcy Petitions, on April 3, 2019, as described in Note 5 the Company wrote off $3 of unamortized deferred debt issuance costs and discounts, which are included in “Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In May 2017, the Company issued an additional $75 aggregate principal amount of New First Lien Notes at an issue price of 100.5%. These notes mature on February 1, 2022 and have the same terms as the New First Lien Notes issued in February 2017. The Company used the net proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes.

The Company also amended and restated its ABL Facility in December 2016 with modifications to, among other things, permit the refinancing of the OldDIP Term Loan Facility were used in part to repay in full the outstanding obligations under the Company’s existing asset-based revolving credit agreement ABL Facility.

Hexion Inc. | 91 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Credit Facilities and Senior Secured Notes. InNotes
    ABL Facility
    On July 1, 2019, in connection with the issuance ofEmergence, the new notes in February 2017, certain lendersCompany, Hexion Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation (the “Canadian ABL Borrower”), Hexion B.V., a company organized under the laws of The Netherlands (the “Dutch ABL Borrower”), Hexion GmbH, a company organized under the laws of Germany (the “German ABL Borrower”), Hexion UK Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of England and Wales ( the “U.K. ABL Borrower” and, together with the Company, the Canadian ABL Borrower, the Dutch ABL Borrower and the German ABL Borrower, the “ABL Borrowers”) entered into a senior secured ABL Facility provided extending revolving credit facility commitmentswith the lenders and other parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, in an aggregate principal amount of $350, with a maturity date of December 5, 2021 (subject to certain early maturity triggers), the existing commitments were terminated and the size ofunder which the ABL Facility was reducedBorrowers may borrow funds from $400time to $350.    
These transactions are collectively referredtime and up to as the “2017 Refinancing Transactions.”
2016 Debt Transactions

During 2016, the Company repurchased $290 of its Old Senior Secured Notes on the open market for cash of $240. These transactions resulted in a gain of $48, which represents the difference between the carrying value of the repurchased debt and the cash paid for the repurchases, less the proportionate$150 amount of unamortized deferred financing fees and debt discounts that were written off in conjunction with the repurchases. This amountwhich is recorded in “Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt”available through a subfacility in the Consolidated Statementsform of Operations.

2015 Debt Transactions

During 2015, the Company repurchased $203letters of its Old Senior Secured Notes on the open market for total cash of $160. These transactions resultedcredit, in a gain of $41, which represents the difference between the carrying value of the repurchased debt and the cash paid for the repurchases, less the proportionate amount of unamortized deferred financing fees and debt discounts that were written off in conjunction with the repurchases. This amount is recorded in “Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
ABL Facility
In March 2013, the Company entered into a $400 asset-based revolving loan facility,each case subject to a borrowing base, (the “ABL Facility”). The ABL Facility replaced the Company's senior secured credit facilities, which included a $171 revolving credit facility and the $47 synthetic letter of credit facility at the time of the termination of facilities upon the Company's entry into the ABL Facility.
as further described below. In December 2016,addition, the Company amended and restated the ABL Facility, with modifications to, among other things, permit the refinancing of the Old Senior Secured Notes with new first-priority senior secured notes, new senior secured notes and/may request one or other secured or unsecured indebtedness. In connection with the issuance of the new notes in February 2017, certain lenders under the ABL Facility provided extended revolving facility commitmentsmore incremental facilities in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $350 with a maturity date of December 5, 2021 (subjectequal to the early maturity triggers described below),greater of (i) $100 and (ii) the existing commitments were terminated and the sizeexcess of the ABL Facility was reduced from $400 toborrowing base over $350.
As amended, the ABL Facility has a maturity date of December 5, 2021 unless, if 91 days prior to the scheduled maturity of the 6.625% First-Priority Senior Notes due 2020 and the 10.00% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes, more than $50 aggregate principal amount of these notes are outstanding, in which case the    The ABL Facility will mature and the commitments thereunder will terminate on such earlier date. Additionally, if 91 days prior to the scheduled maturity of the 9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020, more than $50 aggregate principal amount of these notes are outstanding, the ABL Facility will mature on such earlier date.
Availability under the ABL Facility is $350, subject to a borrowing baseJuly 1, 2024 and bears interest based on a specified percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory. In 2015, the ABL Facility was amended to include certain international property plant and equipment as collateral up to $70. The borrowers under the ABL Facility include the Company and Hexion Canada Inc., Hexion B.V., Hexion UK Limited and Borden Chemical UK Limited, each a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In 2015, the ABL Facility was also amended to include Hexion Gmbh as a borrower.
The ABL Facility bears interest at a floating rate based on, at the Company's option, an adjusted LIBOR rate, plus an initial applicable margin of 2.25%EURIBOR or an alternate base rate (depending on the currency of the borrowing), in each case plus an applicable initial applicable margin of 1.25%. From and after1.50% or, in the date of deliverycase of the Company's financial statementsalternate base rate, 0.50%, which margin may increase or decrease depending on the average availability under the ABL Facility.
The borrowing base is, at any time of determination, an amount (net of reserves) equal to the sum of:
in the case of the borrowing base for the first fiscal quarter ended afterCompany’s U.S., U.K., Dutch and Canadian subsidiaries, 85% of the effectiveamount of eligible receivables (or 90% of the amount of “investment grade” eligible receivables) (including trade receivables), plus
in the case of the borrowing base for the Company’s U.S., U.K., Dutch and Canadian subsidiaries, the lesser of (i) 70% of the amount of eligible inventory and (ii) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, plus
in the case of the borrowing base for the Company’s U.K., Dutch, Canadian and German subsidiaries, the lesser of (i) the sum of (a) 80% of the amount of eligible machinery and equipment appraised on a net orderly liquidation basis and (b) 75% of the appraised fair market value of eligible real property of the loan parties in Canada, England and Wales, the Netherlands and Germany and (ii) the lesser of (x) 20% of the total commitments and (y) 20% of the borrowing base of the borrowers without giving effect to the additional borrowing base from the eligible machinery and equipment and eligible real property, plus
in the case of the borrowing base for the Company’s U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries, 100% of unrestricted cash, in each case held in an account subject to the springing control of the agent; provided, that the cash component of the borrowing base shall not constitute more than the lesser of (x) 15.0% of the total commitments and (y) 15.0% of the borrowing base of the borrowers (calculated prior to giving effect to such limitation).
    The borrowing base of the U.K., Dutch and German subsidiaries may not exceed the greater of 50% of the total commitments and 50% of the borrowing base of the ABL Borrowers. On the closing date of the ABL Facility, as adjusted for the applicable margin for such borrowings willconsummation of the Plan and related transactions, the borrowing base reflecting various required reserves was determined to be adjusted depending on the availability under the ABL Facility. As of December 31, 2017, the applicable margin for LIBOR rate loans was 2.25% and for alternate base rate loans was 1.25%.approximately $350.
    In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the ABL Facility, the Company is required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders in respect of the unutilized commitments thereunder at an initiala rate equal to 0.50% or 0.375% per annum subject to adjustment depending on the usage.average utilization of the commitments. The Company also pays a customary letter of credit fee, including a fronting fee of 0.125% per annum of the daily average stated amount of each outstanding letter of credit, and customary agency fees.
    Outstanding loans under the ABL Facility does not havemay be voluntarily repaid at any financial maintenance covenants,time without premium or penalty, other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to eurocurrency loans.
    The obligations of the Company under the ABL Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by the Company’s direct parent, Hexion Intermediate, and each of the Company’s existing and future wholly-owned material U.S. subsidiaries, which the Company refers to as the “U.S. ABL Guarantors.” In addition, all obligations of the foreign subsidiary borrowers under the ABL Facility are guaranteed by the U.S. ABL Guarantors and certain other direct and indirect wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries, which the Company refers to collectively as the “Foreign ABL Guarantors” and, together with the U.S. ABL Guarantors, the “ABL Guarantors.”
    In addition, the ABL Facility requires the Company to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio at any time when the excess availability is less than the greater of (x) $30 and (y) 10.0% of the lesser of (i) the borrowing base at such time and (ii) the aggregate amount of ABL Facility commitments at such time. In that event, the Company must satisfy a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 that only applies if availability under the1.0. The Company was in compliance with all ABL Facility is less than the greater of (a) $35 and (b) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time. The fixed charge coverage ratio under the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility is generally defined as the ratio for the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters of (a) Adjusted EBITDA minus non-financed capital expenditures and cash taxes to (b) debt service plus cash interest expense plus certain restricted payments, each measured for the four most recent quarters in which financial statements have been delivered.The ABL Facility is secured by, among other things, first-priority liens on most of the inventory and accounts receivable and related assets of the Company, its domestic subsidiaries and certain of its foreign subsidiaries (the “ABL Priority Collateral”), and by second-priority liens on certain collateral that generally includes most of the Company’s, its domestic subsidiaries’ and certain of its foreign subsidiaries’ assets other than the ABL Priority Collateral, in each case subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens. Available borrowings under the ABL Facility were $227provisions as of December 31, 2017,2020 and there were $812019.


Hexion Inc. | 92 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of outstanding borrowingsContents
New Senior Secured Term Loan Facility
Additionally, in connection with the completion of the Plan, on July 1, 2019, the Company and $42 of outstanding letters of creditHexion International Cooperatief U.A., a company organized under the laws of the Netherlands (the “Dutch Term Loan Borrower” and, together with the Company, the “Term Loan Borrowers”), entered into a senior secured term loan facility with the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “Term Loan Facility”), which consists of (i) a USD denominated tranche in an aggregate principal amount of $725 (“Senior Secured Term Loan - USD”) borrowed by the Company and (ii) a EUR denominated tranche in an aggregate principal amount of €425 (“Senior Secured Term Loan - EUR”) borrowed by the Dutch Term Loan Borrower (the Senior Secured Term Loans together with the ABL Facility represent the “Credit Facilities”). In addition, the Company may request one or more incremental facilities in an aggregate amount up to the sum of $425 and amounts that may be incurred pursuant to certain leverage and coverage ratios.
    The Term Loan Facility will mature on July 1, 2026 and bears interest based on (i) in the case of the USD tranche, at the Company’s option, an adjusted LIBOR rate or an alternate base rate, in each case plus an applicable margin equal to 3.50% or, in the case of the alternate base rate, 2.50% and (ii) in the case of the EUR tranche, EURIBOR plus an applicable margin equal to 4.00%. As of December 31, 2020, the effective interest for the Company’s Term Loan Facility on the USD tranche and EUR tranche was 3.73% and 4.00%, respectively, and the effective interest rate as of December 31, 2017.2019 for the Company’s Term Loan Facility on USD tranche and EUR tranche was 5.82% and 4.00%, respectively.

Senior Secured Notes
First-Priority Senior Secured Notes
In March 2012,    The obligations of the Company under the Term Loan Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by Hexion Intermediate and each of the Company’s existing and future wholly owned material U.S. subsidiaries, which subsidiaries the Company refers to collectively as “U.S. Term Guarantors”. In addition, all obligations of the Dutch Term Loan Borrower under the Term Loan Facility are guaranteed by Hexion Intermediate, the Company, the U.S. Term Guarantors and certain other direct and indirect wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries, which foreign subsidiaries the Company collectively refers to as the “Foreign Term Guarantors” (together with the U.S. Term Guarantors, the “Subsidiary Term Guarantors” and, together with Hexion Intermediate, the “Term Guarantors”).
    The Credit Facilities contain among other provisions, restrictive covenants regarding indebtedness, payments and distributions, mergers and acquisitions, asset sales, affiliate transactions, capital expenditures and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. Events of default include the failure to pay principal and interest when due, a material breach of representation or warranty, covenant defaults, events of bankruptcy and a change of control. The Credit Facilities also contain certain other customary affirmative covenants and events of default. If the Company fails to perform its obligations under these and other covenants, the Credit Facilities could be terminated and any outstanding borrowings, together with accrued interest, under the Credit Facilities could be declared immediately due and payable. There were no covenant violations or events of default as of December 31, 2020 or 2019.
Indenture and 7.875% Senior Notes due 2027
The Company entered into an indenture, dated as of July 1, 2019 (the “Indenture”), among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee,and issued $450 aggregate principal amount of 6.625% First-Priority7.875% Senior Secured Notes due 20202027 (the “Senior Notes”) thereunder. The Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by the Company’s existing domestic subsidiaries that guarantee its obligations under its Credit Facilities (as defined below) (the “Guarantors”) on a full and unconditional basis. The following is a brief description of the material provisions of the Indenture and the Senior Notes.
    The Senior Notes will mature on July 15, 2027. Interest on the Senior Notes will accrue at an issue pricethe rate of 100%. In7.875% per annum and will be payable semiannually in arrears on January 2013,15 and July 15, commencing on January 15, 2020.
Optional Redemption. At any time prior to July 15, 2022, the Company issued an additional $1,100 aggregatemay redeem the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of 6.625% First-Prioritythe Senior Secured Notes due 2020redeemed, plus an applicable “make-whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date.
    In addition, at an issue price of 100.75% (the “First-Priority Senior Secured Notes”).
The First-Priority Senior Secured Notes are due on Aprilany time prior to July 15, 2020 and are secured by first-priority liens on collateral that generally includes most of the Company's and its domestic subsidiaries' assets other than inventory and accounts receivable and related assets (the “Notes Priority Collateral”), and by second-priority liens on the domestic portion of the collateral for the ABL Facility (the “ABL Priority Collateral”), which generally includes most of the inventory and accounts receivable and related assets of2022, the Company its domestic subsidiaries and certainmay redeem up to 40% of its foreign subsidiaries, in each case subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens.
10.00% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes
In April 2015, the Company issued $315 aggregate principal amount of 10.00% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (the “10.00% First Lien Notes”). The Company used the net proceeds to redeem or repay all $40 of its outstanding 8.375% Sinking Fund Debentures due 2016, and to repay all amounts outstanding under its ABL facility at the closing of the offering.

The 10.00% First Lien Notes are due April 15, 2020 and are secured by first-priority liens on collateral that generally includes most of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries’ assets other than inventory and accounts receivable and related assets and by second-priority liens on the domestic portion of the collateral for the ABL Facility, which generally includes most of the inventory and accounts receivable and related assets of the Company, its domestic subsidiaries and certain of its foreign subsidiaries, in each case subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens.
8.875% Senior Secured Notes
In January 2010, through the Company’s wholly owned finance subsidiaries, Hexion U.S. Finance Corp. and Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, ULC, the Company issued $1,000 aggregate principal amount of the Old Senior Secured Notes. In January 2013Notes at a redemption price of 107.875% of the Company also issued $200 aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds of Old Senior Secured Notescertain equity offerings; provided that at an issue price of 100%, to lenders in exchange for loans of Hexion LLC, which were retired in full.
The priorityleast 50% of the collateral liens securing the 8.875% Senior Secured Notes is senior to the collateral liens securing the existing Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes, and is junior to the collateral liens securing the Company’s First-Priority Senior Secured Notes.
On February 8, 2017, the Company satisfied and discharged its obligations under the Old Senior Secured Notes by depositing the net proceeds of the offerings of the New First Lien Notes and New Senior Secured Notes, together with cash on its balance sheet, with the trustee for the Old Senior Secured Notes for the purpose of redeeming all of the Company’s outstanding aggregate principal amount of Old Senior Secured Notes, which were redeemed on March 10, 2017.
Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes
In November 2010, through the Company’s wholly owned finance subsidiaries, Hexion U.S. Finance Corp. and Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, ULC, the Company refinanced its existing 9.75% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2014 (the “Old Second Lien Notes”) through the issuance of $574 aggregate principal amount of 9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020, which mature on November 15, 2020 (the “New Second Lien Notes”). $440 aggregate principal amount was offered through a private placement with unaffiliated investors (the “Offering”). The remaining $134 aggregate principal amount of the New Second LienSenior Notes wasoriginally issued under the Indenture remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of such redemption (excluding Notes held by the Company and its subsidiaries); and provided, further, that such redemption occurs within 90 days of the date of the closing of such equity offering.
    On and after July 15, 2022, the Company may redeem all or a part of the Senior Notes at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon, to the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on July 15 of the years indicated below:
YearPercentage
2022103.94 %
2023101.97 %
2024 and thereafter100.00 %
    Change of Control. If a change of control (as defined in exchange for $127the Indenture) occurs, holders of the Senior Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or any part of their Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the Old Second LienSenior Notes that were held byrepurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date.
Hexion Inc. | 93 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
    Certain Covenants. The Indenture governing the Senior Notes contains, among other provisions, restrictive covenants regarding indebtedness, payments and distributions, mergers and acquisitions, asset sales, affiliate transactions, capital expenditures and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. At such time as (1) the Senior Notes have an affiliateinvestment grade rating from both of Apollo Global Management, LLC atMoody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services and (2) no default has occurred and is continuing under the timeIndenture, certain of these and other covenants will be suspended and cease to be in effect.
    Events of Default. The Indenture also provides for certain customary events of default, including, among others, nonpayment of principal or interest, failure to pay final judgments in excess of a specified threshold, failure of a guarantee to remain in effect, bankruptcy and insolvency events, and cross acceleration, which would permit the principal, premium, if any, interest and other monetary obligations on all the then outstanding Senior Notes to be declared due and payable immediately.
    Intercreditor Agreement
    On July 1, 2019, in connection with the Emergence, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as collateral agent under each of the Offering (the “Apollo Exchange”). The exchange ratio was determined basedCredit Facilities, and the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into an ABL Intercreditor Agreement that, among other things, sets forth the relative lien priorities of the secured parties under the Credit Facilities on the consideration offered to holders of the Old Second Lien Notes to redeem the Old Second Lien Notes, which was intended to give Apollo an aggregate value equivalent to that which it would have received if it had received the total consideration upon the Company’s redemption of the Old Second Lien Notes and used the proceeds received to invest in the New Second Lien Notes. The new debt issued to Apollo has the same terms as the notes issuedcollateral shared by the Company inABL Facility and the Offering.
Debentures
Origination
Date
Interest
Payable
Early
Redemption
9.2% debentures due 2021March 1991
March 15
September 15
None
7.875% debentures due 2023May 1993
February 15
August 15
None

Term Loan Facility.
Other Borrowings
The Company’s Australian Term Loan Facility has a variable interest rate equal to the 90 day Australian or New Zealand Bank Bill Rates plus an applicable margin. The agreement also provides access to a $8 revolving credit facility. There were no outstanding borrowings under the$7 revolving credit facility of which there were 0 outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2017 or 2016.2020 and $1 at December 31, 2019. In February 2018,2021, the Company extended its Australian Term Loan Facility through January 2021.February 2026.
The Brazilian bank loans represent various bank loans, primarily for working capital purposes and to finance the construction of manufacturing facilities.
The Company’s other debt obligations represent various international credit facilities in China and Korea to fund working capital needs and capital expenditures. While these facilities are primarily unsecured, portions of the lines are collateralized by equipment and cash and short term investments at December 31, 2020.
The Company’s lease obligations classified as debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets include capitalfinance leases and sale leaseback financing transactions,arrangements, which range from one to fifteen year terms for equipment, pipeline, land and buildings. The Company’s operating leases consist primarily of vehicles, equipment, tank cars, land and buildings.
General
The Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries have pledged, to the applicable collateral agents, 100% of non-voting and 65% of voting equity interests in the Company’s and such domestic subsidiaries’ first-tier foreign subsidiaries, in each case to secure the obligations of the Company and the other domestic obligors under the ABL Facility, the 6.625% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes, the 10.00% First Lien Notes, the New First Lien Notes, the New Senior Secured Notes and the 9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not satisfy the Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges incurrence test contained within the indentures that govern our 6.625% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes, 10.00% First Lien Notes, the New First Lien Notes, New Senior Secured Notes and 9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes. As a result, the Company is subject to restrictions on its ability to incur additional indebtedness or to make investments; however, there are exceptions to these restrictions, including exceptions that permit indebtedness under the ABL Facility (available borrowings of which were $227 at December 31, 2017).
As of December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all covenants included in the agreements governing its outstanding indebtedness, including the ABL Facility.
Scheduled Maturities
Aggregate maturities of debt, minimum payments under capital leases and minimum rentals under operating leasesexcluding amortization of debt discounts, at December 31, 20172020 for the Company are as follows:
YearDebt
2021$84 
202235 
202317 
2024
2025
2026 and thereafter1,651 
Total minimum payments1,805 
Less: Amount representing interest(3)
Present value of minimum payments$1,802 

13. Leases
    The Company leases certain buildings, warehouses, rail cars, land and operating equipment under both operating and finance leases expiring on various dates through 2044. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet and the Company recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For lease agreements entered into or reassessed after the adoption of Topic 842, the Company combines lease and non-lease components.
    The Company determines if a contract is a lease at the inception of the arrangement. The Company reviews all options to extend, terminate, or purchase its right of use assets at the inception of the lease and accounts for these options when they are reasonably certain of being exercised. Nearly all of the Company’s lease contracts do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate. For these contracts, the Company estimates the incremental borrowing rate to discount the lease payments based on information available at lease commencement.
The tables and discussion below represent the Company’s continuing operations and exclude the Held for Sale Business.

Hexion Inc. | 94 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Year Debt 
Minimum Rentals
Under Operating
Leases
 
Minimum
Payments Under
Capital Leases
2018 $120
 $24
 $11
2019 5
 19
 10
2020 2,524
 13
 14
2021 76
 9
 10
2022 785
 5
 22
2023 and thereafter 189
 13
 1
Total minimum payments $3,699
 $83
 68
Less: Amount representing interest     (19)
Present value of minimum payments     $49
Lease Costs
The Company’stable below summarizes the lease costs for the year ended December 31, 2020 and the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 and the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019:
ClassificationSuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019
Operating lease expenseOperating (loss) income$29 $18 $16 
Short-term lease expenseOperating (loss) income
Amortization expenseOperating (loss) income
Interest expense from financing leasesInterest expense, net<1<1<1
Variable lease expenseOperating (loss) income


Balance Sheet Classification
    The table below presents the lease-related assets and liabilities recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Successor
ClassificationDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Assets:
Operating(1)
Operating lease assets$103 $110 
Finance(2)
Machinery and Equipment13 10 
           Total leased assets$116 $120 
Liabilities:
Current
OperatingCurrent portion of operating lease liabilities$19 $20 
FinanceDebt payable within one year
Noncurrent
OperatingOperating lease liabilities76 82 
FinanceLong-term debt
           Total leased liabilities$103 $109 
(1)    Operating lease assets include $8 and $9 of favorable leasehold interests as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.    
(2)    Finance lease assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $3 and $1 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Other Lease Information
    Cash paid for operating leases consist primarilyapproximated operating lease expense and non-cash right-of-use asset amortization for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 and the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019. The table below presents other cash and noncash consideration detail for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 and the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019:
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019
Cash paid for finance leases$$$
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease13 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for finance lease obligations
The tables below present supplemental information related to leases as of vehicles, equipment, landDecember 31, 2020 and buildings. Rental expense under operating leases amounted to $30, $32, and $352019:
SuccessorDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases10.010.7
Finance leases4.81.7
Weighted-average discount rate
Operating leases5.24 %5.74 %
Finance leases7.73 %10.00 %


Hexion Inc. | 95 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
The table below reconciles the undiscounted cash flows for each of the first five years ended and the total of the remaining years to the finance lease liabilities and operating lease liabilities recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2020:
The Company has $1.9 billion of First Priority Senior Secured Notes maturing in April 2020 and $0.6 billion of Second Priority Notes maturing in November 2020. Additionally, if 91 days prior to the scheduled maturity of these notes, more than $50 aggregate principal amount is outstanding, the ABL Facility,
YearMinimum Rentals Under Operating Leases
Minimum Payments Under Finance Leases(1)
2021$23 $
202216 
202311 
2024
2025
2026 and thereafter58 
Total lease payments$126 $
Less: Amount representing interest(31)(1)
Present value of lease liabilities$95 $
(1)     Amounts exclude sale leaseback financing arrangements which matures in December 2021, will accelerate and become immediately due and payable.are not considered leases under Topic 842.
The Company regularly reviews its portfolio and is currently exploring potential divestitures. While there is no guarantee of a transaction, it could include a specific business unit or combination of several businesses. The Company expects that the proceeds from a transaction or transactions upon completion would be used to help reduce the absolute amount of the Company’s debt.
Further, depending upon market, pricing and other conditions, including the current state of the high yield bond market, as well as cash balances and available liquidity, the Company or its affiliates, may seek to acquire notes or other indebtedness of the Company through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers, redemption or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices as the Company or its affiliates may determine (or as may be provided for in the indentures governing the notes), for cash or other consideration.

8.14. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Matters
The Company’s operations involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials. The Company is subject to extensive environmental regulation at the federal, state and local levels as well as foreign laws and regulations, and is therefore exposed to the risk of claims for environmental remediation or restoration. In addition, violations of environmental laws or permits may result in restrictions being imposed on operating activities, substantial fines, penalties, damages or other costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Environmental Institution of Paraná IAP—On August 10, 2005, the Environmental Institute of Paraná (IAP), an environmental agency in the State of Paraná, provided Hexion Quimica Industria, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, with notice of an environmental assessment in the amount of 12 Brazilian reals. The assessment related to alleged environmental damages to the Paranagua Bay caused in November 2004 from an explosion on a shipping vessel carrying methanol purchased by the Company. The investigations performed by the public authorities have not identified any actions of the Company that contributed to or caused the accident. The Company responded to the assessment by filing a request to have it cancelled and by obtaining an injunction precluding execution of the assessment pending adjudication of the issue. In November 2010, the Court denied the Company’s request to cancel the assessment and lifted the injunction that had been issued. The Company responded to the ruling by filing an appeal in the State of Paraná Court of Appeals. In March 2012, the Company was informed that the Court of Appeals had denied the Company’s appeal, and on June 4, 2012 the Company filed appeals to the Superior Court of Justice and the Supreme Court of Brazil. In September 2016, the Superior Court of Justice decided that strict liability does not apply to administrative fines issued by environmental agencies and reversed the decision of the State of Paraná Court of Appeals. The Superior Court of Justice remanded the case back to the Court of Appeals to determine if the IAP met its burden of proving negligence by the Company. In September 2017, the State of Paraná Court of Appeals decided that IAP did not prove that the Company was negligent and granted the Company’s request to annul the environmental assessment. IAP filed a motion for clarification regarding the Court of Appeals’ analysis of the case and the Company filed a motion for clarification regarding attorney fees. After the pending motions are resolved, IAP will have 15 business days to file an appeal with the Superior Court of Justice. The Company does not believe that a loss is probable. At December 31, 2017, the amount of the assessment, including tax, penalties, monetary correction and interest, is 44 Brazilian reals, or approximately $13.
The following table summarizes all probable environmental remediation, indemnification and restoration liabilities, including related legal expenses, at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
 LiabilityRange of Reasonably Possible Costs as of December 31, 2020
Successor
Site Description
December 31, 2020(1)
December 31, 2019(1)
LowHigh
Geismar, LA$12 $12 $$22 
Superfund and offsite landfills – allocated share:
Less than 1%
Equal to or greater than 1%14 
Currently-owned14 
Formerly-owned:
Remediation18 21 14 36 
Monitoring only
Total$47 $51 $34 $93 
 Liability Range of Reasonably Possible Costs as of 12/31/17
Site DescriptionDecember 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 Low High
Geismar, LA$14
 $14
 $9
 $22
Superfund and offsite landfills – allocated share:       
Less than 1%2
 2
 1
 5
Equal to or greater than 1%6
 6
 5
 14
Currently-owned4
 4
 3
 8
Formerly-owned:       
Remediation26
 30
 25
 42
Monitoring only
 1
 
 1
Total$52
 $57
 $43
 $92
(1)The table includes approximately $2 of environmental remediation liabilities related to the Held for Sale Business at both December 31, 2020 and 2019. These associated liabilities have been included in “Long-term liabilities associated with assets held for sale” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
These amounts include estimates for unasserted claims that the Company believes are probable of loss and reasonably estimable. The estimate of the range of reasonably possible costs is less certain than the estimates upon which the liabilities are based. To establish the upper end of a range, assumptions less favorable to the Company among the range of reasonably possible outcomes were used. As with any estimate, if facts or circumstances change, the final outcome could differ materially from these estimates. At both December 31, 20172020 and 2016, $112019, $14 and $13,$18, respectively, havehas been included in “Other current liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets with the remaining amount included in “Other long-term liabilities.”
Following is a discussion of the Company’s environmental liabilities and the related assumptions at December 31, 2017:2020
Geismar, LA Site—The Company formerly owned a basic chemicals and polyvinyl chloride business that was taken public as Borden Chemicals and Plastics Operating Limited Partnership (“BCPOLP”) in 1987. The Company retained a 1% interest, the general partner interest and the liability for certain environmental matters after BCPOLP’s formation. Under a Settlement Agreement approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware among the Company, BCPOLP, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, the Company agreed to perform certain of BCPOLP’s obligations for soil and groundwater contamination at BCPOLP’s Geismar, Louisiana site. The Company bears the sole responsibility for these obligations because there are no other potentially responsible parties (“PRP”) or third parties from whom the Company could seek reimbursement.
Hexion Inc. | 96 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
A groundwater pump and treat system to remove contaminants is operational, and natural attenuation studies are proceeding. If closure procedures and remediation systems prove to be inadequate, or if additional contamination is discovered, costs that would approach the higher end of the range of possible outcomes could result.

Due to the long-term nature of the project, the reliability of timing and the ability to estimate remediation payments, a portion of this liability was recorded at its net present value, assuming a 3% discount rate and a time period of 2120 years. The range of possible outcomes is discounted in a similar manner. The undiscounted liability, which is expected to be paid over the next 2120 years, is approximately $18.$16. Over the next five years, the Company expects to make ratable payments totaling $6.$5.
Superfund Sites and Offsite Landfills—The Company is currently involved in environmental remediation activities at a number of sites for which it has been notified that it is, or may be, a PRP under the United States Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act or similar state “superfund” laws. The Company anticipates approximately 50% of the estimated liability for these sites will be paid within the next five years, with the remainder over the next twenty-five years. The Company generally does not bear a significant level of responsibility for these sites, and as a result, has little control over the costs and timing of cash flows.
The Company’s ultimate liability will depend on many factors including its share of waste volume, the financial viability of other PRPs, the remediation methods and technology used, the amount of time necessary to accomplish remediation and the availability of insurance coverage. The range of possible outcomes takes into account the maturity of each project, resulting in a more narrow range as the project progresses. To estimate both its current reserves for environmental remediation at these sites and the possible range of additional costs, the Company has not assumed that it will bear the entire cost of remediation of every site to the exclusion of other known PRPs who may be jointly and severally liable. The Company has limited information to assess the viability of other PRPs and their probable contribution on a per site basis. The Company’s insurance provides very limited, if any, coverage for these environmental matters.
Sites Under Current Ownership—The Company is conducting environmental remediation at a number of locations that it currently owns, of which ten sites are no longer in operation. As the Company is performing a portion of the remediation on a voluntary basis, it has some control over the costs to be incurred and the timing of cash flows. The Company expects to pay approximately $4 of these liabilities within the next five years, with the remainder over the next ten years. The factors influencing the ultimate outcome include the methods of remediation elected, the conclusions and assessment of site studies remaining to be completed, and the time period required to complete the work. No other parties are responsible for remediation at these sites.
Formerly-Owned Sites—The Company is conducting, or has been identified as a PRP in connection with, environmental remediation at a number of locations that it formerly owned and/or operated. Remediation costs at these former sites, such as those associated with our former phosphate mining and processing operations, could be material. The Company has accrued those costs for formerly-owned sites which are currently probable and reasonably estimable. One such site is the Coronet Industries, Inc. Superfund Alternative Site in Plant City, Florida. The current owner of the site alleged that it incurred environmental costs at the site for which it has a contribution claim against the Company, and that additional future costs are likely to be incurred. The Company signed a settlement agreement in 2016 with the current site owner and a past site owner, of the site,pursuant to which provides the Company will paypaid $10 over three annual installments in fulfillment of the contribution claim against the Company for past remediation costs. The Company timely paid the firstcosts and second installments. Additionally, the Company accepted a 40% allocable share of specified future remediation costs at this site. The Company estimates its allocable share of future remediation costs to be approximately $15.$8. The final costs to the Company will depend on the methodnatural variations in remediation costs, including unforeseen circumstances, agency requests, new contaminants of remediation chosen, the amount of time necessary to accomplish remediationconcern and the ongoing financial viability of the other PRPs. Currently, the Company has insufficient information to estimate the range of reasonably possible costs related to this site.
Monitoring Only Sites—The Company is responsible for a number of sites that require monitoring where no additional remediation is expected. The Company has established reserves for costs related to these sites. Payment of these liabilities is anticipated to occur over the next ten or more years. The ultimate cost to the Company will be influenced by fluctuations in projected monitoring periods or by findings that are different than anticipated.
Indemnifications—In connection with the acquisition of certain of the Company’s operating businesses, the Company has been indemnified by the sellers against certain liabilities of the acquired businesses, including liabilities relating to both known and unknown environmental contamination arising prior to the date of the purchase. The indemnifications may be subject to certain exceptions and limitations, deductibles and indemnity caps. While it is reasonably possible that some costs could be incurred, except for those sites identified above, the Company has inadequate information to allow it to estimate a potential range of liability, if any.

Non-Environmental Legal Matters
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business and had reserves of $3 and $2$1 at both December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, for all non-environmental legal defense costs incurred and settlement costs that it believes are probable and estimable. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, $2 and $1 respectively, has been included in “Other current liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets with the remaining amount included in “Other long-term liabilities.”
Other Legal Matters—The Company is involved in various other product liability, commercial and employment litigation, personal injury, property damage and other legal proceedings in addition to those described above, including actions that allege harm caused by products the Company has allegedly made or used, containing silica, vinyl chloride monomer and asbestos. The Company believes it has adequate reserves and that it is not reasonably possible that a loss exceeding amounts already reserved would be material. Furthermore, the Company has insurance to cover claims of these types.

Hexion Inc. | 97 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Other Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has entered into contractual agreements with third parties for the supply of site services, utilities, materials and facilities and for operation and maintenance services necessary to operate certain of the Company’s facilities on a stand-alone basis. The duration of the contracts range from less than one year to 20 years, depending on the nature of services. These contracts may be terminated by either party under certain conditions as provided for in the respective agreements; generally, 90 days notice is required for short-term contracts and three years notice is required for longer-term contracts (generally those contracts in excess of five years). Contractual pricing generally includes a fixed and variable component.
In addition, the Company has entered into contractual agreements with third parties to purchase feedstocks or other services. The terms of these agreements vary from one to fifteen years and may be extended at the Company’s request and are cancelable by either party as provided for in each agreement. Feedstock prices are based on market prices less negotiated volume discounts or cost input formulas. The Company is required to make minimum annual payments under these contracts as follows:
YearMinimum Annual Purchase Commitments
2021$190 
2022134 
202394 
202450 
202549 
2026 and beyond253 
Total minimum payments770 
Less: Amount representing interest(31)
Present value of minimum payments$739 

YearMinimum Annual Purchase Commitments
2018$199
201997
202097
202110
20229
2023 and beyond68
Total minimum payments480
Less: Amount representing interest(33)
Present value of minimum payments$447

9.15. Pension and Non-Pension Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans covering certain U.S. associates and certain non-U.S. associates primarily in Netherlands, Germany, Canada France and Belgium. Benefits under these plans are generally based on eligible compensation and / or years of credited service. Retirement benefits in other foreign locations are primarily structured as defined contribution plans. During 2009, the Company implemented a change in its U.S. retirement benefits to shift to a defined contribution platform. Benefits under the defined benefit U.S. pension plan were frozen and the Company added an annual Company contribution to the U.S. defined contribution plan for eligible participants. Effective March 1, 2018, the Canadian pension plan was frozen to new entrants.
Certain active participants in the Company’s German defined benefit pension plan relate to the Held for Sale Business. These employees will transfer with the Held for Sale business at closing and therefore, the pension liability and expense associated with these employees is included within discontinued operations. As the Company’s German defined benefit pension plan is unfunded, there is no impact on the Company’s Pension Plan assets. See below table for a summary of the pension liability and expense amounts included in discontinued operations.
Pension Benefits
Successor
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Discontinued OperationsU.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
Benefit obligation$$36 $$29 
Pension Benefits
SuccessorPredecessor
Year ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year ended December 31, 2018
Discontinued OperationsU.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
Net expense$$$$ < 1$$$$
The Company also provides non-pension postretirement benefit plans to certain U.S. associates, to Canadian associates, to Brazilian associates and to certain associates in the Netherlands. The U.S. benefit primarily consists of a life insurance benefit for a grandfathered group of retirees, for which the premiums are paid by the Company. In addition, some U.S. retirees are eligibleEffective December 31, 2018, this life insurance benefit was transferred to participate ina third party financial institution, which moved the medical plans offeredliability from the Company to active associates; however, the retirees’ cost for this coverage depends on the maximum plan benefit and the retiree premium, which is equal to 175% of the active associate premium.third party. The Canadian plans provide retirees and their dependents with medical and life insurance benefits, which are supplemental benefits to the respective provincial healthcare plan in Canada. The Brazilian plan became effective in 2012 as a result of a change in certain regulations, and provides retirees that contributed towards coverage while actively employed with access to medical benefits, with the retiree being responsible for 100% of the premiums. In 2014, the
Hexion Inc. | 98 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
plan was amended such that 100% of the premiums of active employees are paid by the Company. The Netherlands’ plan provides a lump sum payment at retirement for grandfathered associates.

The following table presents the change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and components of funded status for the Company’s defined benefit pension and non-pension postretirement benefit plans for the yearsyear ended December 31:31, 2020, the Successor period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019:
Pension Benefits
Pension Benefits Non-Pension Postretirement BenefitsSuccessorPredecessor
2017 2016 2017 2016 December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
Change in Benefit Obligation               Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$242
 $548
 $249
 $492
 $6
 $10
 $7
 $9
Benefit obligation at beginning of periodBenefit obligation at beginning of period$225 $688 $228 $678 $216 $583 
Service cost3
 16
 3
 14
 
 
 
 
Service cost18 
Interest cost7
 9
 8
 10
 
 1
 
 1
Interest cost
Actuarial losses (gains)6
 (6) 5
 57
 (1) 
 
 (1)
Actuarial lossesActuarial losses17 43 12 14 93 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
 77
 
 (13) 
 
 
 1
Foreign currency exchange rate changes61 (8)(3)
Benefits paid(17) (11) (20) (10) 
 
 (1) 
Benefits paid(15)(13)(8)(6)(8)(6)
Reduction due to divestitures
 
 
 (3) 
 
 
 
Plan amendments
 2
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses paid from assets(3) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses paid from assets(3)(3)
Employee contributions
 1
 
 1
 
 
 
 
Employee contributions— 
Other
 
 (3) 
 
 
 
 
Benefit obligation at end of year$238
 $636
 $242
 $548
 $5
 $11
 $6
 $10
Benefit obligation at end of periodBenefit obligation at end of period$232 $804 $225 $688 $228 $678 
Benefit obligation at end of period - discontinued operationsBenefit obligation at end of period - discontinued operations36 29 29 
Benefit obligation at end of period - continuing operationsBenefit obligation at end of period - continuing operations$232 $768 $225 $659 $228 $649 
Change in Plan Assets               Change in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$207
 $349
 $210
 $316
 $
 $
 $
 $
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of periodFair value of plan assets at beginning of period$197 $483 $196 $470 $185 $404 
Actual return on plan assets26
 4
 17
 33
 
 
 
 
Actual return on plan assets18 58 10 19 60 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
 48
 
 (10) 
 
 
 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes45 (5)(2)
Employer contributions
 21
 3
 19
 1
 
 1
 
Employer contributions40 15 14 
Benefits paid(17) (11) (20) (10) (1) 
 (1) 
Benefits paid(15)(13)(8)(6)(8)(6)
Expenses paid from assets(3) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses paid from assets(3)(3)
Employee contributions
 1
 
 1
 
 
 
 
Employee contributions
Other
 
 (3) 
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year213
 412
 207
 349
 
 
 
 
Funded status of the plan at end of year$(25) $(224) $(35) $(199) $(5) $(11) $(6) $(10)
Fair value of plan assets at end of periodFair value of plan assets at end of period197 614 197 483 196 470 
Funded status of the plan at end of periodFunded status of the plan at end of period$(35)$(190)$(28)$(205)$(32)$(208)
Funded status of the plan at end of period - discontinued operationsFunded status of the plan at end of period - discontinued operations(36)(29)(29)
Funded status of the plan at the end of period - continuing operationsFunded status of the plan at the end of period - continuing operations$(35)$(154)$(28)$(176)$(32)$(179)
Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
Change in Benefit ObligationChange in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of periodBenefit obligation at beginning of period$$13 $$17 $$13 
Interest costInterest cost
Actuarial (gains) lossesActuarial (gains) losses(1)(4)
Foreign currency exchange rate changesForeign currency exchange rate changes(1)
Plan settlementsPlan settlements
Benefit obligation at end of periodBenefit obligation at end of period$$12 $$13 $$17 
Change in Plan AssetsChange in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of periodFair value of plan assets at beginning of period$$$$$$
Employer contributionsEmployer contributions
Plan settlementsPlan settlements
Fair value of plan assets at end of periodFair value of plan assets at end of period
Funded status of the plan at end of periodFunded status of the plan at end of period$$(12)$$(13)$$(17)
 


Hexion Inc. | 99 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Pension BenefitsNon-Pension Postretirement Benefits
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consists of:Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consists of:
Noncurrent assetsNoncurrent assets$$52 $$$$$$
Other current liabilitiesOther current liabilities(6)(5)(1)(1)
Long-term pension and post employment benefit obligationsLong-term pension and post employment benefit obligations(35)(236)(28)(208)(11)(12)
Accumulated other comprehensive lossAccumulated other comprehensive loss
Net amounts recognizedNet amounts recognized$(35)$(190)$(28)$(205)$$(12)$$(13)
Net amounts recognized - discontinued operationsNet amounts recognized - discontinued operations(36)(29)
Net amounts recognized - continued operationsNet amounts recognized - continued operations$(35)$(154)$(28)$(176)$$(12)$$(13)
Pension Benefits Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits
2017 2016 2017 2016
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 consist of:               
Noncurrent assets$
 $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Other current liabilities
 (5) 
 (4) 
 (1) 
 
Long-term pension and post employment benefit obligations(25) (220) (35) (195) (5) (10) (6) (10)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (3) (2) 1
 (2) 2
Net amounts recognized$(25) $(224) $(35) $(202) $(7) $(10) $(8) $(8)
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31 consist of:               
Net prior service cost (benefit)$1
 $(1) $1
 $(4) $
 $2
 $(1) $3
Deferred income taxes(1) 1
 (1) 1
 (2) (1) (1) (1)
Net amounts recognized$
 $
 $
 $(3) $(2) $1
 $(2) $2
Accumulated benefit obligation$238
 $587
 $242
 $504
        Accumulated benefit obligation$232 $757 $225 $648 
Accumulated benefit obligation for funded plans238
 393
 241
 350
        Accumulated benefit obligation for funded plans232 525 225 446 
Pension plans with underfunded or non-funded accumulated benefit obligations at December 31:  
            
Aggregate projected benefit obligation$238
 $615
 $242
 $173
        
Pension plans with underfunded or non-funded accumulated benefit obligations:Pension plans with underfunded or non-funded accumulated benefit obligations:
Aggregate projected benefit obligation(1)
Aggregate projected benefit obligation(1)
$232 $258 $225 $224 
Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation238
 567
 242
 164
        Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation232 250 225 216 
Aggregate fair value of plan assets213
 391
 207
 9
        Aggregate fair value of plan assets197 16 197 13 
Pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at December 31:  
            
Pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:Pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
Aggregate projected benefit obligation$238
 $615
 $242
 $548
        Aggregate projected benefit obligation$232 $285 $225 $287 
Aggregate fair value of plan assets213
 391
 207
 349
        Aggregate fair value of plan assets197 42 197 74 
(1)Aggregate projected benefit obligation related to the Company’s Held for Sale Business was $36 at December 31, 2020 and is included in the table above with the Company’s continuing operations.
The foreign currency impact reflected in these rollforward tables are primarily for changes in the euro versus the U.S. dollar.
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the “2006 PPA”) provides for minimum funding levels on U.S. plans, and plans not meeting the minimum funding requirement may be subject to certain restrictions.
Following are the components of net pension and postretirement expense (benefit) expense recognized for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172020, 2016the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015:
 Pension Benefits
 U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Service cost$3
 $3
 $3
 $16
 $14
 $16
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation7
 8
 10
 9
 10
 12
Expected return on assets(13) (14) (15) (11) (10) (13)
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)
 1
 
 (1) (1) 
Unrealized actuarial (gain) loss(6) 1
 
 1
 35
 (16)
Net (benefit) expense$(9) $(1) $(2) $14
 $48
 $(1)
 Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits
 U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation$
 $
 $
 $1
 $1
 $1
Amortization of prior service benefit
 (1) 
 
 
 
Unrealized actuarial (gain) loss

(1) 
 
 1
 (1) (1)
Net (benefit) expense$(1) $(1) $
 $2
 $
 $


The following amounts were recognized in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” during the year ended December 31, 2017:2018:
 Pension Benefits
 U.S. Plans
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Service cost$$$$
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
Expected return on assets(12)(7)(6)(14)
Unrealized actuarial loss(1)
11 11 
Net expense (benefit)$$(2)$$
Non-U.S. Plans
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
Service cost$18 $$$17 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation10 
Expected return on assets(13)(6)(6)(13)
Unrealized actuarial (gain) loss(1)
(2)39 (26)
Net expense (benefit)(2)
$$15 $44 $(12)

Hexion Inc. | 100 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 Pension Benefits Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits 
Total 
 U.S. Plans 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 U.S. Plans 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 U.S. Plans 
Non-U.S.
Plans
Prior service cost from plan amendments$
 $2
 $
 $
 $
 $2
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)
 1
 
 (1) 
 
Loss (gain) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax$
 $3
 $
 $(1) $
 $2
 Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits
 U.S. Plans
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation$$$$
Unrealized actuarial loss(1)
Net (benefit) expense$$$$
Non-U.S. Plans
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation$$$$
Unrealized actuarial(gain) loss(1)
(1)(4)
Net (benefit) expense$$(4)$$
The amounts(1)Upon the application of fresh start accounting, the Company’s pension and other non-pension postretirement liabilities were remeasured as of the Predecessor period July 1, 2019. As a result, for the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, total unrealized actuarial losses of $44 were recorded to “Reorganization, net” in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” that are expectedthe Consolidated Statements of Operations, $5 of which relate to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit costthe Company’s Held for Sale business.
(2)Net expense (benefit) duringrelated to the next fiscalCompany’s Held for Sale Business was $5, $<1, $6 and $1 for the year are less than $1.ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period from July 2, 2019 to December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2020 and the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively, and is included in the table above.

Determination of actuarial assumptions
The Company’s actuarial assumptions are determined based on the demographics of the population, target asset allocations for funded plans, regional economic trends, statutory requirements and other factors that could impact the benefit obligation and plan assets. For our European plans, most assumptions are set by country, as the plans within these countries have similar demographics, and are impacted by the same regional economic trends and statutory requirements.
The discount rates selected reflect the rate at which pension obligations could be effectively settled. The Company selects the discount rates based on cash flow models using the yields of high-grade corporate bonds or the local equivalent with maturities consistent with the Company’s anticipated cash flow projections. The Company’s pension and OPEB liabilities and related service and interest cost are calculated using a split-rate interest discounting methodology, whereby expected future cash flows related to these liabilities are discounted using multiple interest rates on a forward curve that correspond to the timing of the expected cash flows.
The expected rates of future compensation level increases are based on salary and wage trends in the chemical and other similar industries, as well as the Company’s specific long-term compensation targets by country. Input is obtained from the Company’s internal Human Resources group and from outside actuaries. These rates include components for wage rate inflation and merit increases.
The expected long-term rates of return on plan assets are determined based on the plans’ current and projected asset mix. To determine the expected overall long-term rate of return on assets, the Company takes into account the rates on long-term debt investments held within the portfolio, as well as expected trends in the equity markets, for plans including equity securities. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed and the Company consults with its actuaries, as well as the Plan’s investment advisors, to confirm that the Company’s assumptions are reasonable.

Hexion Inc. | 101 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
The weighted average rates used to determine the benefit obligations were as follows at for the year ended December 31, 20172020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and 2016:the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019:
Pension Benefits
Pension Benefits Non-Pension Postretirement BenefitsSuccessorPredecessor
2017 2016 2017 2016 December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
Discount rate3.5% 1.9% 3.9% 1.9% 3.2% 5.3% 3.5% 6.0%Discount rate2.2 %0.8 %3.1 %1.2 %3.3 %1.3 %
Rate of increase in future compensation levels
 2.4% 
 2.4% 
 
 
 
Rate of increase in future compensation levels3.6 %3.4 %3.4 %
The weighted average assumed health care cost trend rates are as follows at December 31:          
    
Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
Discount rateDiscount rate%4.6 %%5.2 %%6.9 %
Rate of increase in future compensation levelsRate of increase in future compensation levels
The weighted average assumed health care cost trend rates are as follows:The weighted average assumed health care cost trend rates are as follows:
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
 
 
 
 6.6% 5.8% 6.8% 5.9%Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year%6.8 %%5.7 %%6.2 %
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
 
 
 
 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5%Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)%4.5 %%4.0 %%4.0 %
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
 
 
 
 2029
 2023
 2029
 2030
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate— 2040— 2040— 2040
The weighted average rates used to determine net periodic pension expense (benefit) were as follows for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015:the year ended December 31, 2018:
Pension Benefits
U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
Pension Benefits Non-Pension Postretirement BenefitsSuccessorPredecessorSuccessorPredecessor
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. PlansDecember 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Discount rate3.9% 4.1% 3.7% 1.9% 2.3% 2.2% 3.5% 3.4% 3.4% 6.0% 5.5% 6.1%Discount rate3.1 %3.3 %4.1 %3.5 %1.2 %1.3 %1.9 %1.9 %
Rate of increase in future compensation levels
 
 
 2.4% 2.4% 3.0% 
 
 
 
 
 
Rate of increase in future compensation levels3.4 %3.4 %2.3 %2.4 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets6.7% 6.7% 7.0% 2.9% 3.1% 3.8% 
 
 
 
 
 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets6.6 %6.6 %6.6 %6.7 %3.1 %2.6 %3.1 %3.1 %
Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits
U.S. PlansNon-U.S. Plans
SuccessorPredecessorSuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
Discount rateDiscount rate%%4.1 %3.2 %5.2 %6.9 %6.3 %5.3 %
Rate of increase in future compensation levelsRate of increase in future compensation levels— 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assetsExpected long-term rate of return on plan assets
A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would change the projected benefit obligation for international non-pension postretirement benefits by approximately $2 and service cost and interest cost by a negligible amount.$1. The impact on U.S. plans is negligible.

Hexion Inc. | 102 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Pension Investment Policies and Strategies
The Company’s investment strategy for the assets of its North American defined benefit pension plans is to maximize the long-term return on plan assets using a mix of equities, fixed income and alternative investments with a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan funded status and expected timing of future cash flow requirements. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity, fixed-income and alternative investments. For U.S. plans, equity investments are also diversified across U.S. and international stocks, as well as growth, value and small and large capitalization investments, while the Company’s Canadian plan includes a blend of Canadian securities with U.S. and other foreign investments. The alternative investments are allocated in a diversified fund structure with exposure to a variety of hedge fund strategies. Investment risk and performance is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through periodic investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements and periodic asset and liability studies. As plan funded status changes, adjustments to the diversified portfolio may be considered to reduce funded status volatility and better match the duration of plan liabilities.
The Company periodically reviews its target allocation of North American plan assets among the various asset classes. The targeted allocations are based on anticipated asset performance, discussions with investment professionals and on the projected timing of future benefit payments.
The Company observes local regulations and customs governing its European pension plans in determining asset allocations, which generally require a blended weight leaning toward more fixed income securities, including government bonds.
Actual Target 2018ActualTarget 2020
2017 2016  20202019
Weighted average allocations of U.S. pension plan assets at December 31:     Weighted average allocations of U.S. pension plan assets at December 31:   
Equity securities34% 32% 35%Equity securities32 %35 %35 %
Debt securities55% 53% 55%Debt securities55 %53 %55 %
Cash, short-term investments and other11% 15% 10%Cash, short-term investments and other13 %12 %10 %
Total100% 100% 100%Total100 %100 %100 %
Weighted average allocations of non-U.S. pension plan assets at December 31:     Weighted average allocations of non-U.S. pension plan assets at December 31:  
Equity securities22% 23% 22%Equity securities22 %22 %23 %
Debt securities76% 74% 78%Debt securities76 %75 %77 %
Cash, short-term investments and other2% 3% %Cash, short-term investments and other%%%
Total100% 100% 100%Total100 %100 %100 %
Fair Value of Plan Assets
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value measurement provisions establish a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. This guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
 
Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
 
Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date.
 

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. For example, inputs derived through extrapolation or interpolation that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.


Certain investments measured at net asset value (“NAV”), as a practical expedient for fair value, have been excluded from the fair value hierarchy.

Hexion Inc. | 103 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
The following table presents U.S. pension plan investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
 Fair Value Measurements Using
 20202019
 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Large cap equity funds (1)
$$35 $$35 $$37 $$37 
Small/mid cap equity funds (1)
International equity funds (1)
25 25 27 27 
Fixed income securities (1)
107 107 103 103 
Cash equivalents (2)
$$174 $$174 $$175 $$175 
Investments measured at fair value using net asset value as a practical expedient:
Other funds (3)
$23 $22 
Total$197 $197 
 Fair Value Measurements Using
 2017 2016
 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) 
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) 
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Large cap equity funds (1)
$
 $38
 $
 $38
 $
 $35
 $
 $35
Small/mid cap equity funds (1)

 6
 
 6
 
 6
 
 6
International equity funds (1)

 30
 
 30
 
 25
 
 25
Fixed income securities (1)

 116
 
 116
 
 110
 
 110
Cash equivalents (2)

 6
 
 6
 
 4
 
 4
 $
 $196
 $
 $196
 $
 $180
 $
 $180
Investments measured at fair value using net asset value as a practical expedient:               
Investment receivable (3)
      $
       $12
Other funds (4)
      17
       15
Total      $213
       $207

The following table presents non-U.S. pension plan investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
Fair Value Measurements Using
20202019
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Pooled insurance products with fixed income guarantee (1)
$$15 $$15 $$13 $$13 
Cash equivalents (2)
$$15 $$15 $$14 $$14 
Investments measured at fair value using net asset value as a practical expedient:
Other international equity funds (3)
$135 $108 
Other fixed income securities (3)
464 361 
Total$614 $483 
 Fair Value Measurements Using
 2017 2016
 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) 
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) 
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Pooled insurance products with fixed income guarantee (1)
$
 $11
 $
 $11
 $
 $9
 $
 $9
 $
 $11
 $
 $11
 $
 $9
 $
 $9
Investments measured at fair value using net asset value as a practical expedient:               
Other international equity funds (4)
      $90
       $82
Other fixed income securities (4)
      311
       258
Total      $412
       $349
(1)Level 2 equity and fixed income securities are primarily in pooled asset and mutual funds and are valued based on underlying net asset value multiplied by the number of shares held. The underlying asset values are based on observable inputs and quoted market prices.
(1)Level 2 equity and fixed income securities are primarily in pooled asset and mutual funds and are valued based on underlying net asset value multiplied by the number of shares held. The underlying asset values are based on observable inputs and quoted market prices.
(2)Cash equivalents represent investment in a collective short term investment fund, which is a cash sweep for uninvested cash that earns interest monthly. For these investments, book value is assumed to equal fair value due to the short duration of the investment term.
(3)Represents receivables from investments in commingled funds sold in the fourth quarter of 2016, subject to a 90 day liquidation period.
(4)Represents investments in commingled funds with exposure to a variety of hedge fund strategies, which are not publicly traded and have ongoing redemption restrictions. The Company’s interest in these investments is measured at net asset value per share as a practical expedient for fair value, which is derived from the underlying asset values in these funds, only some of which represent observable inputs and quoted market prices. In accordance with ASU 2015-07, these investments are excluded from the fair value hierarchy.

(2)Cash equivalents represent investment in a collective short term investment fund, which is a cash sweep for uninvested cash that earns interest monthly. For these investments, book value is assumed to equal fair value due to the short duration of the investment term.
(3)Represents investments in commingled funds with exposure to a variety of hedge fund strategies, which are not publicly traded and have ongoing redemption restrictions. The Company’s interest in these investments is measured at net asset value per share as a practical expedient for fair value, which is derived from the underlying asset values in these funds, only some of which represent observable inputs and quoted market prices.
Projections of Plan Contributions and Benefit Payments
The Company expects to make contributions totaling $23$36 to its defined benefit pension plans in 2018.2021.

Hexion Inc. | 104 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Estimated future plan benefit payments as of December 31, 20172020 are as follows:
 Pension Benefits 
Non-Pension
Postretirement Benefits 
Year
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
 
U.S.
Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Plans
2018$19
 $12
 $1
 $1
201918
 13
 1
 
202018
 12
 1
 
202117
 14
 1
 
202216
 15
 1
 
2023-202775
 97
 2
 2
 Pension Benefits
Non-Pension
Postretirement Benefits 
Year
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
U.S.
Plans
Non-U.S.
Plans
2021$17 $16 $$
202216 16 
202315 17 
202415 19 
202515 17 
2026-203064 118 
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company sponsors a number of defined contribution plans for its associates, primarily in the U.S., Canada, Europe and in the Asia-Pacific region. Full-time associates are generally eligible to participate immediately and may make pre-tax and after-tax contributions subject to plan and statutory limitations. For certain plans, the Company has the option to make contributions above the match provided in the plan based on financial performance.
As previously discussed, U.S retirement income benefits are provided under the Company's defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”). This plan allows eligible associates to make pre-tax contributions from 1% to 15% of eligible earnings for associates who meet the IRS definition of a highly compensated employee and up to 25% for all other associates up to the federal limits for qualified plans. Associates contributing to the 401(k) are eligible to receive matching contributions from the Company at 100% on contributions of up to 5% of eligible earnings. An additional matching contribution may be made if the Company achieves specified annual financial targets established at the beginning of each plan year. In addition, the Company makes an annual retirement contribution ranging from 3% to 7% of eligible compensation depending on years of benefit service. All associates who are actively employed on the last day of the year are eligible for the true-up match and annual retirement contribution, unless otherwise determined by collective bargaining agreements. Effective January 2, 2018, the 401(k) Plan added the option for eligible participants to make after-tax contributions to a Roth 401(k).
The Company incurred expense for contributions under its defined contribution plans of $16, $14, $6, $7 and $20$17 during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015,the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively.
Non-Qualified and Other Retirement Benefit Plans
The Company provides key executives in some locations with non-qualified benefit plans that provide participants with an opportunity to elect to defer compensation or to otherwise provide supplemental retirement benefits in cases where executives cannot fully participate in the defined benefit or defined contribution plans because of plan or local statutory limitations. Most of the Company's supplemental benefit plans are unfunded and benefits are paid from the general assets of the Company. The liabilities related to defined benefit supplemental benefits are included in the previously discussed defined benefit pension disclosures.
The Company maintains a non-qualified defined contribution plan (the “SERP”) that provides annual employer credits to eligible U.S. associates of 5% of eligible compensation above the IRS limit for qualified plans. The Company can also make discretionary credits under the SERP; however, no participant contributions are permitted. The account credits are made annually to an unfunded phantom account, in the following calendar year. Certain executives also previously earned benefits under U.S. non-qualified executive supplemental plans that were frozen prior to 2010.
The Company’s liability for these non-qualified benefit plans was $6$4 and $5 at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and is included in “Other long-term liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company’s German subsidiaries offer a government subsidized early retirement program to eligible associates called Altersteilzeit or ATZ Plans. The German government provides a subsidy in certain cases where the participant is replaced with a qualifying candidate. The Company had liabilities for these arrangements of $1$3and $2 at both December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019, respectively. The Company incurred expense for these plans of $1, less than $1, less than $1 and $1 for each of the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015.the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively.
Also included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at both December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 are other post-employment benefit obligations relating to long-term disability and for liabilities relating to European jubilee benefit plans of $3.$4.

Hexion Inc. | 105 | 2020 Form 10-K
10. Stock Option Plans and

Table of Contents
16. Stock Based Compensation
Cancellation and Expiration of Outstanding Predecessor Equity Awards
    As of the Effective Date, in conjunction with the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, all outstanding unvested unit options and restricted deferred units of the Predecessor Company’s parent company, TopCo, were canceled, effective immediately (See Note 6 for more information). There was no financial statement impact as a result of these cancellations.
Successor Company Stock Based Awards
The following is a summary of existingthe new stock based compensation plans issued after Emergence and their related outstanding shares as of December 31, 2017:
2020:
Plan NameGrant Date
Shares Outstanding(1)
Plan ExpirationVesting Terms/StatusOption TermNumber of Shares Authorized
Resolution Performance 2000 Stock OptionHexion Holdings Corporation 2019 Omnibus Incentive PlanNovember 2010August 20298 yrs 30 daysn/a plan expired7,635,389 
Tranche A optionsRestricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) and Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”):15,745
Fully vested
Tranche B performance options2019 Grants31,516
Fully vested
Resolution Performance 2000 Non-Employee Directors Option PlanRSUs81,132September 2019
1,034,100November 2010Fully vested8 yrs 30 daysn/a plan expired
Resolution Specialty Materials 2004 Stock Option PlanOctober 20148 yrs 30 daysn/a plan expired
Tranche A options1,902
Fully vested
Tranche B performance options3,804
Fully vested
Director options42,799
Fully vested
BHI Acquisition Corp. 2004 Stock Incentive PlanAugust 201410Time-vest ratably over 3 years,n/a plan expired
Tranche A options837,647
Fully vested
Tranche B performance options837,647
Fully vested
Director options56,282
Director grants vest upon IPO / change but must be employed on July 1, 2022 in control
Hexion LLC 2007 Long-Term Incentive PlanDecember 20171,700,000
Optionsorder to purchase units159,500
Vest upon attainment of performance targetsreceive shares; Accelerated vesting upon change in controlcontrol.8 years
Restricted stock unitsPSUs50,000September 2019
2,412,894Fully vestedPerformance based with market conditions: Step vest over 4 years based on a 20 consecutive trading-day volume weighted average price per share from $20 to $30 per share. PSUs that vest by June 30, 2022 will be settled in July 2022 and remaining PSUs that vest by June 30, 2023 will be settled in July 2023.N/A
Momentive Performance Materials Holdings LLC 2011 Equity Incentive Plan2020 GrantsFebruary 202110 years20,800,000
Unit Options and Restricted Deferred Units (“RDUs”):RSUsMarch 2020692,441
2011 Grant
Tranche A Options and RDUs
Options:
2,029,271


Time-vest ratably over 43 years; Accelerated vesting six months after certainupon change of control transactions as defined by the 2011 Equity Planin control.
Tranche B Options and RDUsPSUs
Options:
1,012,596

RDUs:
337,529
March 2020

811,425Performance-based: VestPerformance based: 50% vest upon the earlier of i) the two year anniversary from the date of the achievement of the targeted common unit value following certain corporate transactions or ii) the six month anniversary fromadjusted return on invested capital targets as of December 31, 2022. 50% vest upon achievement of Hexion Segment EBITDA Margin targets as of December 31, 2022. PSUs that vest will be settled in July 2023.
2020 Non-employee Grants
RSUsJanuary 202073,332Time-vest ratably over 3 years; Accelerated vesting upon change in control. Settled upon vesting.
RSUsAugust 202060,664100% vest on June 1, 2021; Accelerated vesting upon change in control. RSUs that vest will be settled upon the date the targeted common unit value is achieved following certain change of control transactionsnon-employee director leaves board service.
Tranche C Options and RDUsOptions:
1,012,596

RDUs:
337,529

Performance-based: Vest upon the earlier of i) the one year anniversary from the date of the achievement of the targeted common unit value following certain corporate transactions or ii) the six month anniversary from the date the targeted common unit value is achieved following certain change of control transactions
2013 Grant
Unit Options3,891,261
Time-vest ratably over 4 years; Accelerated vesting six months after a change of control event as defined by the 2011 Equity Plan10 years
RDUs3,069,859
Performance-based: Vest upon the earlier of 1) one year from the achievement of the targeted common unit value and a realization event or 2) six months from the achievement of the targeted common unit value and a change in control event, as such terms are defined by the 2011 Equity PlanN/A

(1)Shares outstanding includes shares awarded to associates related to the Held for Sale Business.
Summary of Plans
Legacy Plans
Prior to October 2010, the Company’s parent, Hexion LLC, maintained six stock-based compensation plans: the Resolution Performance 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “Resolution Performance Plan”), the Resolution Performance 2000 Non-Employee Directors Option Plan (the “Resolution Performance Director Plan”), the Resolution Performance Restricted Unit Plan (the “Resolution Performance Unit Plan”), the Resolution Specialty 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “Resolution Specialty Plan”), the BHI Acquisition 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Borden Chemical Plan”) and the 2007 Hexion LLC 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan. In addition to these plans, the Company’s parent maintains a stock-based deferred compensation plan, which is discussed below. The options granted under each of the option plans were to purchase common units in Hexion LLC.
Effective October 1, 2010, in conjunction with the previous combination of Hexion and MPM, stock options to purchase common units in Hexion LLC that were granted to our Directors and those granted under the Resolution Performance 2000 Stock Option Plan, the Resolution Performance 2000 Non-Employee Directors Option Plan, the Resolution Specialty 2004 Stock Option Plan, the BHI Acquisition 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the Hexion LLC 2007 Long-Term Incentive plan to purchase common units in Hexion LLC were converted on a one-for-one basis to an equivalent number of options to purchase common units in Hexion Holdings. Similarly, the restricted Hexion LLC unit awards granted under the Hexion 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the BHI Acquisition 2004 Deferred Compensation Plan and the Resolution Performance Restricted Unit Plan were converted on a one-for-one basis to common units in Hexion Holdings.
2011 Equity Plan
In 2011, the Compensation Committee ofOn August 8, 2019, the Board of ManagersDirectors of Hexion Holdings approved the Momentive Performance MaterialsHexion Holdings LLC 2011 EquityCorporation 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2011 Equity“2019 Incentive Plan”). Under the 2011 Equity Plan,, whereby Hexion Holdings can award unitis reserving shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, representing 10% of Hexion Holding’s fully diluted equity as of the date of approval of the 2019 Incentive Plan, for issuance to employees, directors, and other key service providers in connection with stock options, unit awards, restricted stock units, restricted deferredperformance-based stock units and other unit-based awards.equity-based awards (such as performance stock units) to be awarded from time to time as the Board determines. The restricted deferredand performance stock units are non-voting units of measurement which are deemed to be equivalent to one share of common unit of Hexion Holdings. The unit options are options to purchase common unitsstock of Hexion Holdings. The awards contain restrictions on transferability and other typical terms and conditions.
Unit Options    Restricted Stock Units - Employee Grants
In 2013, the CompanySeptember 2019, Hexion Holdings granted Unit OptionsRSUs that time vest over three years with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $16. The fair value was determined using the estimated aggregate fair value of equity per share on the grant date. Compensation cost is recognized equally over the 3 year service period. For certain retirement eligible associates, the stock-based compensation cost is accelerated according to the plan documents. Upon vesting, RSUs are settled in shares at the end of the three year vesting period. As of December 31, 2020, a total of 344,700 RSUs had vested.
Hexion Inc. | 106 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
In March 2020, Hexion Holdings granted additional RSUs to certain employees that time vest over three years with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $11. The fair value was determined using the estimated aggregate fair value of equity per share on the grant date. Compensation cost is recognized equally over the 3 year service period. For certain retirement eligible associates, the stock-based compensation cost is accelerated according to the plan documents. Upon vesting, RSUs are settled in shares at the end of the three year vesting period. As of December 31, 2020, no RSUs had vested.
Restricted Stock Units - Director Grants
In January 2020, Hexion Holdings granted RSUs to certain non-employee directors that time vest over three years with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $2. The fair value was determined using the estimated aggregate fair value of equity per share on the grant date. Compensation cost is recognized equally over the 3 year service period. Upon vesting, RSUs are settled in shares. As of December 31, 2020, a total of 36,666 shares had vested and settled.
In August 2020, Hexion Holdings granted RSUs to certain non-employee directors that time vest over one year with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $1. The fair value was determined using the estimated aggregate fair value of equity per share on the grant date. Compensation cost is recognized equally over the 1 year service period. RSUs that vest are settled in shares upon the date the non-employee director leaves board service. As of December 31, 2020, no shares had vested.
    Performance Stock Units
    In September 2019, Hexion Holdings granted PSUs with market conditions with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $29. The fair value was estimated at the grant date using a Monte Carlo valuation method. The Monte Carlo valuation method requires the use of a range of assumptions. The range ofassumptions that includes the risk-free interest rates was 0.11%of 1.49% to 2.06%,1.87% and expected volatility rates ranged from 28.1%39% to 35.5% and the dividend rate was 0%60%. The expected life assumption is not used in the Monte Carlo valuation method, but the output of the model indicated a weighted-average expected life of 6.23.8 years.
In 2011, The PSUs step vest over four years upon the Company granted Tranche A Options with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $6. The fair value of each option was estimated at the grant date using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used to estimate the fair value were a 2.17% risk-free interest rate, a 6.25 year expected life, a 37.5% expected volatility rate and a 0% dividend rate.
In 2011, the Company granted Tranche B and Tranche C Options with performance and market conditions, each with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $3. The fair value was estimated at the grant date using a Monte Carlo valuation method, which is a commonly accepted valuation model for awards with market and performance conditions. The Monte Carlo valuation method requires the use of a range of assumptions. The range of risk-free interest rates was 0.16% to 3.44%, expected volatility rates ranged from 34.6% to 41.7% and the dividend rate was 0%. The expected life assumption is not used in the Monte Carlo valuation method, but the outputachievement of the model indicated a weighted-average expected lifepre-established goals by the end of 9.2 years.the fourth year of the term. PSUs that vest by June 30, 2022 will be settled in shares in July 2022 and remaining PSUs that vest by June 30, 2023 will be settled in shares by July 2023. As of December 31, 2017 it is2020, the market conditions have not probable the related options will vest.been met and no PSUs have vested. Compensation cost will be recognized over 3.8 years and adjusted accordingly as vesting conditions are met. For certain retirement eligible associates, the service period oncerecognition of stock-based compensation cost is accelerated according to the satisfaction of the performance condition is probable.plan documents.
Restricted Deferred Units
In 2013, the CompanyMarch 2020, Hexion Holdings granted RDUsPSUs with performance and market conditions with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $4.$13. The fair value was determined using the estimated ataggregate fair value of equity per share on the grant date usingdate. The PSUs vest upon achievement of the same Monte Carlo valuation method and assumptions used forperformance metrics. 50% of the Unit Options. The RDUs havePSUs vest upon achievement of an indefinite life, thus the term used in the valuation model was 30 years, which resulted in a weighted-average expected lifeadjusted return on invested capital target as of 22 years. As of December 31, 2017, it is not probable the related RDUs2022. 50% vest upon achievement of Hexion Segment EBITDA Margin target as of December 31, 2022, and will vest.be settled in shares in July 2023. Compensation cost will be recognized over the service period once the satisfaction of thewhen a performance condition is probable.
In 2011, the Company granted Tranche A RDUs with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $4.
In 2011, the Company granted Tranche Bdeemed probable and Tranche C RDUs with performance and marketadjusted accordingly as vesting conditions each with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $2. The fair value was estimated at the grant date using the same Monte Carlo valuation method and assumptions used for the Tranche B and Tranche C Options. The RDUs have an indefinite life, thus the term used in the valuation model was 30 years, which resulted in a weighted-average expected life of 21.4 years.are met. As of December 31, 2017 it is not probable the related RDUs will vest. Compensation cost will be recognized over the service period once the satisfaction of2020, the performance condition is probable.
Although the 2011 Equity Plan was issued by Hexion Holdings, the underlyingconditions have not been deemed probable, thus no PSUs have vested and no compensation cost represents compensation costs paidhas been recorded.
The following is a summary of Company’s RSU and PSU plan activity for by Hexion Holdings on Hexion’s behalf, as a result of the employees’ serviceyear ended December 31, 2020:
Hexion Holdings Common RSUsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair ValueHexion Holdings Common PSUsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 20191,034,100 $15.37 2,412,894 $11.97 
Units granted882,422 $15.80 823,619 $15.80 
Units forfeited(16,348)$15.80 (12,194)$15.80 
Units vested(381,366)$15.41 $
Nonvested at December 31, 2020(1)
1,518,808 $15.60 3,224,319 $12.93 
(1)Nonvested shares include shares awarded to Hexion. All compensation cost is recorded over the requisite service period on a graded-vesting basis.associates related to discontinued operations.

Financial Statement Impact
    Although the 2019 Incentive Plan was issued by Hexion Holdings, the underlying share-based compensation cost represents compensation costs paid for by Hexion Holdings on Hexion’s behalf, as a result of the employees’ service to Hexion. The compensation costs for RSUs and PSUs are recorded over the requisite service period on a graded-vesting basis and over the derived service period, respectively.
Share-based compensation expense iscosts are recognized, net of estimatedactual forfeitures, over the requisite service period on a graded-vesting basis.basis for RSUs. Stock-based compensation cost is recognized, net of forfeitures, over the requisite service period on a graded-vesting basis over the derived service period for PSUs. The Company adjusts compensation expense periodically for forfeitures. Stock based compensation costs are included in “Non-cash stock based compensation expense” on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The Company recognized $17 and $8 share-based compensation costs for the year ended December 31, 2020 and the Successor period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, respectively. The amount of expense offor associates related to discontinued operations was less than $1 for both the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015,the Successor period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019. There were no share-based compensation costs for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, and year ended December 31, 2018, respectively. The amounts are included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company expects additional compensation expense
Hexion Inc. | 107 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of $17, which will be recognized upon an initial public offering or other future contingent event.Contents
Options Activity
Following is a summary of the Company’s stock option plan activity for the year ended December 31, 2017:
  Hexion Holdings Common Units 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016 11,360,391
 $3.97
Options granted 
 $
Options forfeited (848,006) $3.53
Options outstanding at December 31, 2017 (1)
 10,512,385
 $4.01
     
Exercisable at December 31, 2017 8,982,742
 $2.80
Expected to vest at December 31, 2017 37,021
 $1.21
(1)Includes 2,318,200 of options that expired on December 31, 2017.
At December 31, 2017, exercise prices for options outstanding ranged from $1.21 to $29.42, with a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.8 years. The weighted average remaining contractual life for options exercisable and options expected to vest was 3.3 and 7.6 years, respectively. At December 31, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value of both options exercisable and options expected to vest was $0.
The total amountCompany’s Parent had 57,568,295 shares of cash received and total intrinsic value (which is the amount by which thecommon stock price exceeded the exercise price of the options on the date of exercise) of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $0.
Restricted Unit Activity
Following is a summary of the Company’s restricted unit plan activity for the year ended December 31, 2017
  Hexion Holdings Common Units 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2016 3,925,775
 $1.91
Restricted units granted 
 $
Restricted units vested 
 $
Restricted units forfeited (180,858) $2.30
Nonvested at December 31, 2017 3,744,917
 $1.95
Asoutstanding as of December 31, 2017, there are no outstanding unvested time-based vesting restricted units.2020.
Stock-Based Deferred Compensation Plan
In 2004, in connection with the acquisition of Borden Chemical by Apollo, certain key employees of the Company deferred the receipt of compensation and were credited with a number of deferred stock units that were equal in value to the amount of compensation deferred. In total, the Company granted 1,007,944 deferred common stock units under the Hexion LLC 2004 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2004 DC Plan”), which is an unfunded plan. Each unit gives the grantee the right to one common stock unit of Hexion Holdings. Under the 2004 DC Plan, the deferred common stock units are not distributed to participants until their employment with the Company ends. At December 31, 2017, there were 198,394 undistributed units under the 2004 DC Plan. Under certain limited circumstances this award could be distributed in the form of a cash payment.17. Income Taxes

11. Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale

In December 2017, the Company announced the proposed sale of its Additives Technology Group business (“ATG”) to MÜNZING CHEMIE GmbH (“MÜNZING”), a privately-owned specialty additive company headquartered in Abstatt, Germany. ATG is included within the Company’s Forest Products Resins segment. On January 8,During 2018, the sale was completed and the Company received approximately $50 in cash proceeds from the transaction, subject to customary post-closing adjustments. Proceeds from the sale will be used for general corporate purposes. In addition, the Company recorded a gain on this disposition of $44.
12. Dispositions

HAI
On May 31, 2016, the Company sold its 50% interest in HA-International, LLC (“HAI”), a joint venture within the Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins segment serving the North American foundry industry, to its joint venture partner HA-USA, Inc., for a purchase price of $136, which includes $2 representing the Company’s 50% share of HAI’s cash balance at closing. Sale proceeds consisted of $61 in cash and a $75 buyer’s note issued by HA-USA, Inc. to the Company. As of December 31, 2016, the entire $75 of cash has been received on the buyer’s note. The Company recognized a gain on this disposition of $120, which is recorded as a component of “Gain on dispositions” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

PAC Business
On June 30, 2016, the Company completed the sale of its Performance Adhesives, Powder Coatings, Additives & Acrylic Coatings and Monomers business (the “PAC Business”) pursuant to the terms of a purchase agreement with Synthomer plc (the “Buyer”) dated March 18, 2016. The PAC Business includes manufacturing sites in Sokolov, Czech Republic; Sant’Albano, Italy; Leuna, Germany; Ribecourt, France; Asua, Spain; Roebuck, South Carolina; and Chonburi, Thailand. The PAC Business produced resins, polymers, monomers and additives that provide enhanced performance for adhesives, sealants, paints, coatings, mortars and cements used primarily in consumer, industrial and building and construction applications.
    The Company received gross cash consideration for the PAC Business in the amount of $226, less approximately $6 relating to liabilities, net of cash and estimated working capital, that transferred to the Buyer as part of the Purchase Agreement. A subsequent post-closing adjustment to the purchase price of less than $1 was made in accordance with the purchase agreement. The Company recorded a gain on this disposition of $120, which is recorded in “Gain on dispositions” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The PAC Business generated annual sales of approximately $370 in 2015, and was reported within the Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins segment. The PAC Business had pre-tax income of $14 and $15 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which is reported as a component of “Loss before income tax and earnings from unconsolidated entities” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

13. Acquisitions
In August 2015, the Company acquired the remaining 50% interest in Momentive Union Specialty Chemicals Ltd (“MUSC”), a joint venture that manufactures phenolic specialty resins in China, from its joint venture partner to better position the Company to serve its customers in this region. As a result of the transaction, the Company now owns a 100% interest in MUSC. This transaction was accounted for as a step acquisition and the allocation of the consideration exchanged was based upon a valuation of MUSC’s net identifiable assets and liabilities as of the transaction date. A gain of $5 was recorded in “Other operating expense (income), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, which represents the difference between the $10 fair value and $5 carrying value of the Company’s previously held 50% non-controlling interest in MUSC on the acquisition date. The fair value of the non-controlling interest was determined using a market approach.

14. Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation that included a broad range of business tax provisions, including but not limited to a reduction in the U.S. federal tax rate from 35% to 21% as well as provisions that limit or eliminate various deductions or credits. The legislation also causes U.S. expenses, such as interest and general administrative expenses, to be taxed and imposes a new tax on U.S. cross-border payments. The 2017 provision for income taxes includes a provisional one-time charge of $65 for the transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and profits, which results in an associated one-time reduction of an estimated $185 in the Company’s net operating loss carryforward.
In response to the enactment of U.S. tax reform, the SEC issued guidance (referred to as “SAB 118”) to address the complexity in accounting for this new legislation. When the initial accounting for items under the new legislation is incomplete, the guidance allows companies to recognize provisional amounts when reasonable estimates can be made or to continue to apply the prior tax law if a reasonable estimate of the impact cannot be made. The SEC has provided up to a one-year window for companies to finalize the accounting for the impacts of this new legislation and the Company anticipates finalizing its accounting during 2018.
The Company's accounting for the above items is based upon reasonable estimates of the tax effects of Tax Reform; however, its estimates may change upon the finalization of its implementation and additional interpretive guidance from regulatory authorities. The Company will complete its accounting for the above tax effects of Tax Reform during 2018 as provided in SAB 118 and will reflect any adjustments to its provisional amounts as an adjustment to the provision for taxes in the reporting period in which the amounts are finally determined.

Additionally, certain provisions of Tax Reform are not effective until 2018. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of these provisions and has not yet recorded any impact in the financial statements, nor has the Company made any accounting policy elections with respect to these items.
During 2017, the Company recognized income tax expense of $18,$31, primarily as a result of income from certain foreign operations. In the United States, disallowed interest expense resulted in current year taxable income which utilized a net operating loss carryforward. The disallowed interest expense carryforward of $283 generated a deferred tax asset. The decrease in the valuation allowance due to the net operating loss utilization was offset by an increase in the valuation allowance recorded on the interest expense carryforward deferred tax asset. The Company had a Global Intangible Low Tax Income (“GILTI”) inclusion of $21, which was fully offset by our net operating loss. This further reduced our valuation allowance.
    During the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, the Predecessor Company recorded income tax expense of $40 for reorganization adjustments, primarily consisting of tax expense of $50 for the gain recognized between fair value and tax basis (the gain in Predecessor Company will be substantially offset by the Predecessor Company’s tax attributes, including net operating losses and previously disallowed interest expense). A tax benefit of $10 was recorded for the removal of a valuation allowance for certain foreign jurisdictions. Pursuant to the Plan, the Successor Company is obligated to indemnify the Predecessor Company for any tax related liabilities. The Predecessor Company recorded income tax expense of $201 in the Predecessor period, primarily related to the increase in deferred tax liabilities resulting from fresh start accounting.
    The Predecessor Company’s U.S. net operating loss carryforward of $1,053 and certain state net operating loss carryforwards, along with other tax attributes, have been utilized or forfeited as a result of the taxable gain realized upon Emergence. Certain foreign net operating losses and other carryforwards of the Predecessor Company were forfeited upon Emergence.
    Upon the Emergence, the Successor Company applied fresh start accounting (see Note 6 for more information regarding fresh start accounting) and therefore the deferred tax assets and liabilities were adjusted based on the revised U.S. GAAP financial statements. As a result of the step-up in U.S. GAAP basis in the Successor Company’s foreign assets without a corresponding step-up in the tax basis of the foreign assets, the Successor Company’s deferred tax liability increased. An Internal Revenue Code §338(h)(10) election was made to treat the Emergence as an asset sale for U.S. income tax purposes. As a result, the Emergence was treated as a deemed sale of assets of the Predecessor Company while the Successor Company received a step-up in U.S. tax basis to fair value. The Successor Company elected bonus depreciation on the stepped-up U.S. eligible fixed assets. The Successor Company elected to amortize the stepped-up basis of intangibles over a 15-year period and the Successor Company’s depreciation and amortization expense generated a U.S. net operating loss for both the tax years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. The U.S. net operating loss will be carried forward indefinitely, but will be subject to an 80% limitation on U.S. taxable income starting in 2021.
    During the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Company recognized income tax benefit of $10, primarily as a result of losses from certain foreign operations of which the deferred tax asset created is not offset by a valuation allowance. Losses in the United States created a deferred income tax benefitasset which was completely offset by an increase to the valuation allowance. The Company incurredrecognized a provisional income tax expenseGILTI inclusion of $167 associated with revaluing its$5, which was fully offset by our net U.S. deferred tax attributes to reflect the new U.S. corporate tax rate of 21%, as well as an additional $65 provisional income tax expense associated with the estimated transition tax. The Company’soperating loss and further reduced our valuation allowance was reduced by $234 as a result of the impact Tax Reform had on reducing its net deferred tax assets.
Due to the newly enacted U.S. tax rate change, estimated balances as of December 31, 2017 represent timing differences, which may change when those estimates are finalized with the filing of the 2017 income tax return. At this time,allowance. As previously discussed above, the Company has not yet gathered, prepared and analyzed the informationelected bonus depreciation in sufficient detail to complete the calculations necessary to finalize the amount of the transition tax. As the Company completes its analysis of accumulated foreign earnings and profits and related foreign taxes paid on an entity by entity basis and finalizes the amounts held in cash or other specified assets, the Company will update its provisional estimate of the transition tax and assess the impact on its valuation allowance. 2019.
During 2016, the Company recognized income tax expense of $38, primarily as a result of income from certain foreign operations. Losses in the United States created a deferred income tax benefit which was completely offset by an increase to the valuation allowance.
During 2015, the Company recognized income tax expense of $34, primarily as a result of income from certain foreign operations. Losses in the United States created a deferred income tax benefit which was completely offset by an increase to the valuation allowance.    Income tax expense detail for the Company for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015the year ended December 31, 2018 is as follows:
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Current:
Federal$(14)$(1)$36 $(4)
State and local13 
Foreign22 11 25 
Total current60 22 
Deferred:
Federal(2)
State and local(1)
Foreign(24)143 
Total deferred(14)141 
Income tax expense (benefit) (1)
$14 $(10)$201 $31 
 2017 2016 2015
Current:     
State and local$2
 $2
 $2
Foreign19
 34
 25
Total current21
 36
 27
Deferred:     
Federal(5) 
 
State and local
 (1) 
Foreign2
 3
 7
Total deferred(3) 2
 7
Income tax expense$18
 $38
 $34
(1)Excludes income tax expense of $1, $1, $21, and $9 for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, and the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively, related to the Held for Sale Business.
A reconciliation of the Company’s combined differences between income taxes computed at the federal statutory tax rate of 35%21% and the provisions for income taxes for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows: 
 2017 2016 2015
Income tax benefit computed at federal statutory tax rate$(77) $(4) $(8)
State tax provision, net of federal benefits
 
 1
Foreign tax rate (benefit) differential(2) (18) (15)
Foreign source (loss) income subject to U.S. taxation(45) 21
 41
Losses (gains) and other expenses (income) not deductible (excluded) for tax20
 (4) 1
(Decrease) increase in the taxes due to changes in valuation allowance(129) 42
 17
Additional (benefit) expense on foreign unrepatriated earnings
 (16) 18
Additional expense (benefit) for uncertain tax positions5
 (3) 3
Tax recognized in other comprehensive income(3) 
 (1)
Changes in enacted tax laws and tax rates167
 
 (23)
Transition tax expense65
 
 
Write-off of deferred tax assets17
 20
 
Income tax expense$18
 $38
 $34

In December 2017,2020, the United States enacted tax reform legislation. As a result, in 2017 the Company incurred a provisional income tax expense of $167 associated with revaluing its net U.S. deferred tax attributes to reflect the new U.S. corporate tax rate of 21%, as well as an additional $65 provisional income tax expense associated with the estimated transition tax. The Company’s valuation allowance was reduced by $234 as a result of the impact Tax Reform had on reducing its net deferred tax assets.
In December 2015, the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (the “2015 Act”) was signed into law. The 2015 Act extended the controlled foreign corporation look-through rule, which provides for the exclusion of certain foreign earnings from U.S. federal taxationSuccessor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019. The impact of2019, the 2015 Act has been accounted for in thePredecessor period of enactment. As a result, the company recognized a tax benefit of $23 duringJanuary 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2015.2018:
Hexion Inc. | 108 | 2020 Form 10-K

SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Income tax (benefit) expense computed at federal statutory tax rate$(31)$(21)$622 $(35)
State tax (benefit) expense, net of federal benefit(5)(2)
Foreign tax rate expense differential33 13 
Foreign source income subject to U.S. taxation
Non-deductible losses and other expenses
Increase (decrease) in the taxes due to changes in valuation allowance46 17 (433)25 
Additional (benefit) expense on foreign unrepatriated earnings(3)
Additional (benefit) expense for uncertain tax positions(4)44 15 
Tax recognized in other comprehensive income(1)(4)
Changes in enacted tax laws and tax rates
Tax benefit for fresh start accounting and reorganization adjustments(68)
Other decrease (increase) of deferred tax assets(8)(8)
Income tax expense (benefit)(1)
$14 $(10)$201 $31 
(1)Excludes income tax expense of $1, $1, $21, and $9 for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, and the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively, related to the Held for Sale Business.
The domestic and foreign components of the Company’s loss before income taxes for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018:
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Domestic$(138)$(46)$2,754 $(216)
Foreign(11)(58)206 52 
Total(1)
$(149)$(104)$2,960 $(164)
(1)Excludes (loss) income before income taxes of $(70), 2016$5, $155, and 2015 is as follows: $38 for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively, related to the Held for Sale Business.

 2017 2016 2015
Domestic$(143) $(115) $(242)
Foreign(77) 104
 220
Total$(220) $(11) $(22)
The tax effects of significant temporary differences, and net operating losslosses, interest expense limitation, and credit carryforwards, which comprise the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 20172020 and 2016 is2019 are as follows: 
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Assets:
Non-pension post-employment$$
Accrued and other expenses61 97 
Property, plant and equipment
Loss, expense, and credit carryforwards240 163 
Intangible assets11 
Pension and postretirement benefit liabilities47 14 
Gross deferred tax assets363 282 
Valuation allowance(217)(122)
Net deferred tax asset146 160 
Liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment(227)(228)
Unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries(7)(10)
Intangible assets(66)(65)
Gross deferred tax liabilities(300)(303)
Net deferred tax liability(1)
$(154)$(143)
(1)Excludes net deferred tax liability of $20 and $15 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, related to the Held for Sale Business.
Hexion Inc. | 109 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 2017 2016
Assets:   
Non-pension post-employment$5
 $5
Accrued and other expenses53
 94
Property, plant and equipment1
 2
Loss and credit carryforwards477
 589
Intangibles6
 6
Pension and postretirement benefit liabilities47
 51
Gross deferred tax assets589
 747
Valuation allowance(522) (651)
Net deferred tax asset67
 96
Liabilities:   
Property, plant and equipment(52) (71)
Unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries(9) (9)
Intangible assets(9) (19)
Gross deferred tax liabilities(70) (99)
Net deferred tax liability$(3) $(3)

The following table summarizes the presentation of the Company’s net deferred tax liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019: 
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Assets:
Long-term deferred income taxes$$
Liabilities:
Long-term deferred income taxes(161)(149)
Net deferred tax liability(1)
$(154)$(143)
 2017 2016
Assets:   
Long-term deferred income taxes$8
 $10
Liabilities:   
Long-term deferred income taxes(11) (13)
Net deferred tax liability$(3) $(3)
(1)Excludes net deferred tax liability of $20 and $15 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 respectively, related to the Held for Sale Business.

Hexion LLC, the Company’s parent, isHoldings, and its direct subsidiary Hexion Intermediate Holding 1, Inc. and its direct subsidiary Hexion Intermediate Holding 2, Inc. (the “Eligible Subsidiaries”) are not a membermembers of the registrant. Hexion LLCHoldings and its eligible subsidiariesEligible Subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return. Therefore, the Company can utilize Hexion LLC'sHoldings and its Eligible Subsidiaries’ tax attributes or vice versa. Cumulative income at Hexion LLC has reduced the amount of net operating loss carryforwards otherwise available to the Company by $26. However, since the Company accounts for Hexion LLC under the separate return method, the utilization is not reflected in the above gross deferred tax asset - loss and credit carryforwards. Further, the valuation allowance above does not reflect the related $26 offset.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had a $522$217 valuation allowance for a portion ofagainst its net deferred tax assets that management believes, more likely than not, will not be realized. The Company’s deferred tax assets include federal, state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards.carryforwards as well as an interest expense carryforward. The federal net operating loss carryforwards available are $1,158,$636, which is reduced byexcludes the cumulative income from Hexion LLC,Holdings and its Eligible Subsidiaries, as described above. The federal net operating loss carryforwards expirewill be carried forward indefinitely, but beginning in 2027.2021, will be subject to an 80% limitation on U.S. taxable income. A full valuation allowance has been providedrecorded against these loss carryforwards. The Company’s deferred assets also include minimum tax credits of $2, which are available indefinitely and have no associated valuation allowance. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance against its state deferred tax assets, primarily related to state net operating loss carryforwards of $90.$19. A valuation allowance of $130$97 has been providedrecorded against a portion of foreign net operating loss carryforwards, primarily in Germany and the Netherlands.
The Company continues to not assert indefinite reinvestment of undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries outside of the United States. Accordingly, a related deferred tax liability of $9$7 is recorded.
The following table summarizes the changes in the valuation allowance for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, and 2015the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018: 
 Balance at
Beginning
of Period
Changes in
Related Gross
Deferred Tax
Assets/Liabilities
Charge / (Release)Balance at
End of
Period
Valuation allowance on Deferred tax assets:
Predecessor
Year ended December 31, 2018498 27 525 
January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019525 (427)98 
Successor
July 2, 2019 through December 31, 201998 24 122 
Year ended December 31, 2020(1)
122 41 54 217 
 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Changes in
Related Gross
Deferred Tax
Assets/Liabilities
 Charge 
Balance at
End of
Period
Valuation allowance on Deferred tax assets:       
Year ended December 31, 2015$588
 $6
 $17
 $611
Year ended December 31, 2016611
 (2) 42
 651
Year ended December 31, 2017651
 
 (129) 522
Under SAB 118, the Company continues to evaluate its valuation allowance against its net(1)The changes in related gross deferred tax assets. At this time,assets/liabilities is related to the Company has not yet gathered, preparedapplication of discontinued operations accounting to asset sale entities for tax purposes.
For 2020, previous and analyzed the necessary information in sufficient detail to estimate future taxable income. In 2017,current losses in the U.S. and in certain foreign operations infor recent periods provisionally providedcontinue to provide sufficient negative evidence to maintainrequiring a full valuation allowance against the net federal, state, and certain foreign deferred tax assets.
Examination of Tax Returns
The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, certain of its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examinations by taxing authorities throughout the world, including major jurisdictions such as the United States, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
With minor exceptions, the Company’s closed tax years for major jurisdictions are years prior to: 20132016 for United States, 20112013 for Brazil, 2010 for Canada, 20122015 for China, 20142016 for Germany, 20072016 for Italy, 2010 for Netherlands and 20122017 for the United Kingdom.
The Company continuously reviews issues that are raised from ongoing examinations and open tax years to evaluate the adequacy of its liabilities. As the various taxing authorities continue with their audit/examination programs,process, the Company will adjust its reserves accordingly to reflect thesethe current status and settlements.

Hexion Inc. | 110 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents

Unrecognized Tax Benefits
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: 
SuccessorPredecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019
Balance at beginning of period$130 $133 $94 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year41 
Additions for tax positions of prior years14 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(20)(3)(6)
Settlements(1)(4)
Foreign currency translation(1)
Balance at end of period(1)
$129 $130 $133 
 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of year$73
 $62
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year2
 4
Additions for tax positions of prior years1
 42
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(1) (35)
Settlements
 
Foreign currency translation5
 
Balance at end of year$80
 $73
(1)Includes unrecognized tax benefits of $6, $5, and $11 for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 and the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 associated with the Held for Sale business.
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020 and the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Company increaseddecreased the amount of its unrecognized tax benefits, including its accrual for interest and penalties, by $13,$10 and $1, respectively, primarily as a result of increasesdecreases in the unrecognized tax benefit for various intercompany transactions, offset by releases of unrecognized tax benefits from negotiations with foreign jurisdictions, and lapses of statute of limitations.limitations and settlements, offset by increases of unrecognized tax benefits for various intercompany transactions. During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2015,the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized approximately $5, $6$9, $2, $3 and $4,$3, respectively, in interest and penalties. The Company had approximately $49$56, $56, and $43$54 accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and July 1, 2019, respectively.
$80129 of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate; however, a portion of the unrecognized tax benefit would be in the form of a net operating loss carryforward, which would be subject to a full valuation allowance. The Company anticipates recognizing less than $2$15 of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months as a result of lapses of statute of limitations, negotiations with foreign jurisdictions, settlements, and completion of audit examinations.

15.18. Dispositions

ATG
On January 8, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its Additives Technology Group business (“ATG”) to MÜNZING CHEMIE GmbH. ATG was previously included within the Company’s Forest Products Resins segment and includes manufacturing sites located in Somersby, Australia and Sungai Petani, Malaysia. The ATG business produced a range of specialty chemical materials for the engineered wood, paper impregnation and laminating industries, including catalysts, release agents and wetting agents.
The Company received gross cash consideration for the ATG business in the amount of $49, which was used for general corporate purposes. The Company recorded a gain on this disposition of $44 which is included in “Gain on dispositions” in the Predecessor Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.
19. Summarized Financial Information of Unconsolidated Affiliates
The Company has included audited financial statements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 of the unconsolidated affiliate Momentive UV Coatings (Shanghai) Co., Ltd as Exhibit 10.90 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Summarized financial information of the unconsolidated affiliate HAI for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 
2016 (1)
 2015
Net sales$59
 $161
Gross profit25
 54
Pre-tax income14
 31
Net income14
 31
(1)Amounts for the year ended December 31, 2016 represent activity through May 31, 2016, the date on which the Company sold its 50% interest in HAI (see Note 12).
The Company has included audited financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 of HAI as Exhibit 10.70 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Summarized financial information of the Company’s remaining unconsolidated affiliates, which are listed below, as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, and 20152019 is as follows:
Hexion Shchekinoazot Holding B.V.Momentive UV Coatings (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
Sanwei Hexion Company Limited
Hexion Australia Pty Ltd
MicroBlend Columbia S.A.SS.A.S.

Excluded from the table below is the summarized financial information for the Russia JV since it is part of the Held for Sale Business (See Note 4).
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Current assets$38 $32 
Non-current assets
Current liabilities20 10 
Non-current liabilities
Hexion Inc. | 111 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
Current assets$21
 $19
Non-current assets18
 18
Current liabilities13
 15
Non-current liabilities10
 10
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Net sales$59 $33 $39 $88 
Gross profit16 22 
Pre-tax income13 
Net income
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net sales$78
 $71
 $93
Gross profit16
 15
 13
Pre-tax income3
 6
 
Net income (loss)2
 4
 (1)
16.20. Segment and Geographic Information
TheRealignment of Reportable Segments in 2020
    As part of the Company’s businesscontinuing efforts to drive growth and greater operating efficiencies, in January 2020, the Company changed its reporting segments are basedto align around its two growth platforms: (i) Adhesives and (ii) Coatings and Composites. At December 31, 2020, the Company’s continuing operations has three reportable segments which consist of the following businesses:
Adhesives: these businesses focus on the products that the Company offers and the markets that it serves. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company added Corporate and Other as a reportable segment.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had three reportable segments: Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins; Forest Products Resins; and Corporate and Other. A summary of the major products and items associated withglobal adhesives market. They include the Company’s reportable segments are as follows:global wood adhesives business, which now also includes the oilfield technologies group, including: forest products resin assets in North America, Latin America, Australia and New Zealand; and global formaldehyde.
Epoxy, PhenolicCoatings and Coating Resins: epoxyComposites: these businesses focus on the global coatings and composites market. They include the Company’s base and specialty resins, phenolic encapsulated substrates, versatic acids and derivatives, basic epoxy resins and intermediates, phenolic specialty resinsVersatic™ Acids and molding compounds
Derivatives businesses.
Forest Products Resins: forest products resins and formaldehyde applications

Corporate and Other:primarily corporate general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the other segments, such as
shared service and administrative functions and foreign exchange gains and losseslosses.
    The Company has recast its Net Sales and legacy company costs.Segment EBITDA (as defined below) for the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 and for the Predecessor periods July 1, 2019 and January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 to reflect the new reportable segments.

Reportable Segments
Following are net sales, Segment EBITDA and other financial information from continuing operations by reportable segment. Segment EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) by reportable segment. Segment EBITDA is defined as EBITDA adjusted for certain non-cash items and other income and expenses. Segment EBITDA is the primary performance measure used by the Company’s senior management, the chief operating decision-maker and the board of directors to evaluate operating results and allocate capital resources among segments. Segment EBITDA is also the profitability measure used to set management and executive incentive compensation goals. Corporate and Other is primarily corporate general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the other segments, such as shared service and administrative functions and foreign exchange gains and losses not allocated to continuing segments.

Net Sales(1):
Following is continuing operations revenue by reportable segment. Product sales within each reportable segment share economically similar risks. These risks include general economic and industrial conditions, competitive pricing pressures and the Company’s ability to pass on fluctuations in raw material prices to its customers. A substantial number of the Company’s raw material inputs are petroleum-based and their prices fluctuate with the price of oil. Due to differing regional industrial and economic conditions, the geographic distribution of revenue may impact the amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers.
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Adhesives$1,188 $693 $761 $1,641 
Coatings and Composites1,322 630 720 1,496 
Total$2,510 $1,323 $1,481 $3,137 
(1)    Intersegment sales are not significant and, as such, are eliminated within the selling segment.

Hexion Inc. | 112 | 2020 Form 10-K

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$2,052
 $2,094
 $2,589
Forest Products Resins1,539
 1,344
 1,551
Total$3,591
 $3,438
 $4,140
Table of Contents
Segment EBITDA:
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Adhesives(1)
$214 $116 $135 $252 
Coatings and Composites(2)
151 60 96 200 
Corporate and Other(71)(37)(30)(71)
Total$294 $139 $201 $381 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017
2016
2015
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins (2)
$174

$258

$307
Forest Products Resins (3)
257

240

233
Corporate and Other(66)
(65)
(74)
Total$365
 $433
 $466
(1)    Included in Adhesives Segment EBITDA are “Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes” of less than $1 for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 and the Predecessor Period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and $1 for the Predecessor year ended December 31, 2018.
(2)    Included in Coatings and Composites Segment EBITDA are “Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes” of $2, $2, $1 and $3 for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense:
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Adhesives (1)
$97 $47 $21 $50 
Coatings and Composites90 44 20 44 
Corporate and Other
Total$191 $93 $43 $98 
(1)    Includes accelerated depreciation of $2 and $4 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2018. There was no accelerated depreciation in either the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 or in the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019.

Total Assets(1):
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Adhesives$2,202 $2,374 
Coatings and Composites1,404 1,371 
Corporate and Other396 401 
Total$4,002 $4,146 
(1)Includes assets held for sale at December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Capital Expenditures(1):
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Adhesives$62 $21 $18 $35 
Coatings and Composites43 22 22 43 
Corporate and Other
Total$108 $47 $41 $81 
(1)    Includes capitalized interest costs that are incurred during the construction of property and equipment.

Hexion Inc. | 113 | 2020 Form 10-K
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017
2016
2015
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$71
 $87
 $96
Forest Products Resins40
 40
 35
Corporate and Other4
 4
 6
Total$115
 $131
 $137
Total Assets:

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$1,100
 $1,002
Forest Products Resins880
 840
Corporate and Other117
 213
Total$2,097
 $2,055
Capital Expenditures(4):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017
2016
2015
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$73
 $72
 $71
Forest Products Resins40
 67
 106
Corporate and Other5
 2
 2
Total$118
 $141
 $179
(1)Intersegment sales are not significant and, as such, are eliminated within the selling segment.
(2)
Included in the Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins Segment EBITDA are “Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes” of $3, $11 and $17 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(3)
Included in the Forest Products Resins Segment EBITDA are “Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes” of $1, less than $(1) and less than $(1) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(4)Includes capitalized interest costs that are incurred during the construction of property and equipment.


Reconciliation of Net Loss to Segment EBITDA:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net loss$(234) $(38) $(39)
Income tax expense18
 38
 34
Interest expense, net329
 310
 326
Depreciation and amortization115
 131
 137
Accelerated depreciation14
 129
 2
EBITDA$242

$570
 $460
Items not included in Segment EBITDA:     
Asset impairments$13
 $
 $6
Business realignment costs52
 55
 16
Realized and unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)3
 (11) 10
Gain on dispositions
 (240) 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt3
 (48) (41)
Unrealized (gains) losses on pension and OPEB plan liabilities(4) 34
 (13)
Other56
 73
 28
Total adjustments123
 (137) 6
Segment EBITDA$365
 $433
 $466
      
Segment EBITDA:     
Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins$174
 $258
 $307
Forest Products Resins257
 240
 233
Corporate and Other(66) (65) (74)
Total$365
 $433
 $466
Items Not Included in Segment EBITDA
Not included in Segment EBITDA are certain non-cash items and other income and expenses. For 2017 and 2016, these other items primarily included certain professional fees related to strategic projects and expenses from retention programs. For 2015, these other items primarily included expenses from retention programs, certain professional fees related to strategic projects and management fees, partially offset by gains on the disposal of assets and a gain on a step acquisition.
Business realignment costs for 2017 primarily included costs related to in-process cost reduction programs and certain in-process and recently completed facility rationalizations. Business realignment costs for 2016 primarily included costs related to the rationalization at our Norco, LA manufacturing facility and costs related to certain in-process cost reduction programs. Business realignment costs for 2015 primarily included costs related to certain in-process cost reduction programs.
Geographic Information
Net Sales(1):
SuccessorPredecessor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
United States$1,142 $617 $693 $1,449 
Netherlands523 240 308 652 
Canada278 153 154 362 
China259 121 121 229 
Brazil123 83 91 194 
Other international185 109 114 251 
Total$2,510 $1,323 $1,481 $3,137 
(1) Sales are attributed to the country in which the individual business locations reside.
Following is net sales by reportable segment disaggregated by geographic region(1):
Successor
December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019
 AdhesivesCoatings and CompositesTotalAdhesivesCoatings and CompositesTotal
North America$910 $510 $1,420 $517 $255 $772 
Europe20 521 541 12 236 248 
Asia Pacific124 291 415 69 139 208 
Latin America134 134 95 95 
Total$1,188 $1,322 $2,510 $693 $630 $1,323 
Predecessor
January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
AdhesivesCoatings and CompositesTotalAdhesivesCoatings and CompositesTotal
North America$562 $286 $848 $1,215 $596 $1,811 
Europe15 305 320 $37 $644 681 
Asia Pacific81 129 210 $170 $254 424 
Latin America103 103 $219 $221 
Total$761 $720 $1,481 $1,641 $1,496 $3,137 
(1) Intersegment sales are not significant and, as such, are eliminated within the selling segment.

Long-Lived Assets(1):
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
United States$1,520 $1,605 
Netherlands556 526 
Brazil79 105 
Canada113 116 
Other international234 218 
Total$2,502 $2,570 
(1)Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment, net; goodwill; and other intangible assets, net.



Hexion Inc. | 114 | 2020 Form 10-K

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017
2016 2015
United States$1,513
 $1,389
 $1,663
Netherlands595
 583
 698
Canada344
 302
 344
China270
 296
 331
Germany198
 180
 205
Brazil176
 162
 224
Other international495
 526
 675
Total$3,591
 $3,438
 $4,140
(1)
Sales are attributed to the country in which the individual business locations reside.

Reconciliation of Net Loss to Segment EBITDA:
Long-Lived Assets:
 SuccessorPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Reconciliation:
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(230)$(89)$2,894 $(162)
Add: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest(1)
Less: Net (loss) income from discontinued operations(69)135 28 
Net (loss) income from continued operations(161)(92)2,760 (191)
Income tax expense (benefit)14 (10)201 31 
Interest expense, net100 55 89 365 
Depreciation and amortization (1)
191 93 43 98 
EBITDA144 46 3,093 303 
Adjustments to arrive at Segment EBITDA:
Asset impairments and write-downs$16 $$$32 
Business realignment costs (2)
69 22 14 27 
Realized and unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)(7)28 
Gain on dispositions(44)
Unrealized losses (gains) on pension and OPEB plan liabilities(13)
Transaction costs (3)
11 26 13 
Reorganization items, net (4)
(2,943)
Non-cash impact of inventory step-up(5)
27 (27)
Accelerated deferred revenue (6)
18 
Other non-cash items (7)
43 10 14 
Other (8)
12 14 18 21 
Total adjustments150 93 (2,892)78 
Segment EBITDA$294 $139 $201 $381 
Segment EBITDA:
Adhesives214 116 135 252 
Coatings and Composites151 60 96 200 
Corporate and Other(71)(37)(30)(71)
Total$294 $139 $201 $381 
(1)For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2018 accelerated depreciation of $2 and $4 has been included in “Depreciation and amortization.” There was no accelerated deprecation in either the Successor year ended December 31, 2019 or in the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019.
(2)Business realignment costs for the Successor and Predecessor periods below included:
SuccessorPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Severance costs$16 $$8��$
In-process facility rationalizations11 11 
Contractual costs from exited business
Business services implementation22 
Legacy environmental reserves
Other
(a)     The Company had $8 of severance liabilities accrued within “Other current liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at both December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company expects the amounts associated with these severance liabilities to be paid over the next 12 months.
(3)For the year ended December 31, 2020, transaction costs included certain professional fees related to strategic projects. For the Successor period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, transaction costs primarily included $6 and $23, respectively, of certain professional fees and other expenses related to the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings.
(4)Represents incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings after the date of filing, gains on settlement of liabilities under the Plan and the net impact of fresh start accounting adjustments. The amounts excludes the “Non-cash impact of inventory step-up” discussed below.

Hexion Inc. | 115 | 2020 Form 10-K

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
United States$495
 $555
Netherlands119
 99
Germany127
 92
Brazil76
 80
Canada68
 58
Other international195
 182
Total$1,080
 $1,066
(5)Represents $27 of non-cash expense related to the step up of finished goods inventory on July 1 as part of fresh start accounting that was expensed
in the successor period upon the sale of the inventory.
17.(6)For the Predecessor period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, $18 of deferred revenue was accelerated on July 1 as part of Fresh Start accounting.
(7)Other non-cash items for the Successor and Predecessor periods presented below included:
SuccessorPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Fixed asset write-offs$13 $$$
Stock-based compensation costs17 
Long-term retention programs(2)
One-time capitalized variance impact of inventory fresh start step-up(4)
Other— 
(8)Other for Successor and Predecessor periods presented below included:
SuccessorPredecessor
Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 through
July 1, 2019
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Legacy and other non-recurring items$$$$
IT outage (recoveries) costs, net(4)
Financing fees and other14 



21. Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Following is a summary of changes in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for the years ended December 31, 20172020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, the Predecessor period of January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and 2016:the year ended December 31, 2018:
Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement PlansForeign Currency Translation AdjustmentsCash Flow HedgeTotal
Predecessor
Balance at December 31, 2018$(1)$(17)$$(18)
Change in value(8)(8)
Elimination of Predecessor Company accumulated other comprehensive loss25 26 
Balance at July 1, 2019$$$$
Successor
Balance at July 2, 2019$$$$
Change in value(3)(1)
Balance at December 31, 2019$$(3)$$(1)
Change in value(8)(18)(26)
Balance at December 31, 2020$$(11)$(16)$(27)

 Year Ended December 31, 2017 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Plans Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Total Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Plans Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Total
Beginning balance$3
 $(42) $(39) $4
 $(19) $(15)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax(2) 33
 31
 (1) (23) (24)
Ending balance$1
 $(9) $(8) $3

$(42) $(39)
18. Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Subsidiary Financial Information
The Company’s 6.625% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020, 10.00% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020, New First Lien Notes, New Senior Secured Notes and 9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 are guaranteed by certain of its U.S. subsidiaries.
The following information contains the condensed consolidating financial information for Hexion Inc. (the parent),| 116 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
22. Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
 Successor
Three Months Ended December 31, 2020
Three Months Ended September 30, 2020
(as revised) (1)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
Net sales$655 $634 $534 $687 
Operating (loss) income(10)(28)(34)
Net (loss) income from continuing operations, net of taxes(37)(26)(36)(62)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes(68)(6)
Net loss$(35)$(94)$(42)$(59)
(1)     “Net income (loss) from discontinued operations” and “Net loss” for the combined subsidiary guarantors (Hexion Investments Inc.; Lawter International, Inc.; HSC Capital Corporation (dissolvedthree months ended September 30, 2020 includes a revision of approximately $8 of income to correct an overstatement of expense in April 2017); Hexion International Inc.; Hexion CI Holding Company (China) LLC; NL COOP Holdings LLC and Oilfield Technology Group, Inc. (dissolved in September 2017))previously issued interim financial statements. See below for additional information.
 SuccessorPredecessor
Three Months Ended December 31, 2019July 2, 2019 through September 30, 2019
July 1, 2019(1)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019(2)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Net sales$630 $693 $$750 $731 
Operating (loss) income(30)(18)40 27 
Net (loss) income from continuing operations, net of taxes(48)(44)2,935 (118)(57)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of taxes119 10 
Net (loss) income(45)(43)3,054 (108)(51)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest(1)(1)
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(46)$(43)$3,054 $(108)$(52)
(1)During the Emergence on July 1, 2019, the Predecessor recognized $3,126 of reorganization adjustments, which relate to gains on the settlement of liabilities under the Plan, offset by the incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Bankruptcy Petitions and the combined non-guarantor subsidiaries, which includes allnet impact of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.
All of the subsidiary guarantorsfresh start accounting adjustments, are 100% owned by Hexion Inc. All guarantees are full and unconditional, and are joint and several. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Company to obtain funds from its domestic subsidiaries by dividend or loan. While the Company’s Australian, New Zealand and Brazilian subsidiaries are restrictedclassified as “Reorganization items, net” in the paymentConsolidated Statements of dividendsOperations (see Note 6 and intercompany loans due toNote 7 for more information).
(2)During the termsthree months ended June 30, 2019, the Predecessor recognized $156 of their credit facilities, thereincremental costs directly as a result of Bankruptcy Petitions. These costs are no material restrictions onclassified as “Reorganization items, net” in the Company’s ability to obtain cash fromConsolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 6 and Note 7 for more information).

In the remaining non-guarantor subsidiaries.
These financial statements are prepared on the same basis as thefourth quarter 2020, we identified certain errors within our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020:

Approximately $13 associated with an insurance premium financing arrangement was incorrectly disclosed as a non-cash financing activity but should have been classified as an operating cash outflow from continuing operations and financing cash inflow;

“Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations” was overstated by approximately $13 and “Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities from discontinued operations” was understated by approximately $13 due to activity within “Other assets, current and non-current” being incorrectly classified; and

The impairment charge recognized with respect to our Held for Sale Business was overstated by approximately $8 which also resulted in an understatement of the Company exceptAssets Held for Sale as of September 30, 2020.

Based upon quantitative and qualitative assessments, we have determined that investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method for purposes of the consolidating presentation. The principal elimination entries relate to investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.
This information includes allocations of corporate overheadthese adjustments were not material to the combined non-guarantor subsidiaries based on net sales. Income tax expense has been provided onpreviously issued interim financial statements. The impacts to the combined non-guarantor subsidiaries based on actual effective tax rates.previously issued interim financial statements will be revised in our Form 10-Q filing for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2021 and are shown in the tables below.



HEXION INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2017

Hexion Inc. | 117 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
 Hexion Inc. 
Combined
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Assets         
Current assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $0 and $18, respectively)$13
 $
 $102
 $
 $115
Accounts receivable, net126
 1
 335
 
 462
Intercompany accounts receivable121
 
 80
 (201) 
Intercompany loans receivable1
 
 22
 (23) 
Inventories:        
Finished and in-process goods85
 
 136
 
 221
Raw materials and supplies36
 
 56
 
 92
Current assets held-for-sale1
 
 5
 
 6
Other current assets19
 
 25
 
 44
Total current assets402
 1
 761
 (224) 940
Investments in unconsolidated entities158
 13
 20
 (171) 20
Deferred income taxes
 
 8
 
 8
Long-term assets held for sale
 
 2
 
 2
Other long-term assets17
 8
 24
 
 49
Intercompany loans receivable1,114
 
 190
 (1,304) 
Property and equipment, net410
 
 514
 
 924
Goodwill52
 
 60
 
 112
Other intangible assets, net32
 
 10
 
 42
Total assets$2,185
 $22
 $1,589
 $(1,699) $2,097
Liabilities and Deficit         
Current liabilities:         
Accounts payable$129
 $
 $273
 $
 $402
Intercompany accounts payable80
 
 121
 (201) 
Debt payable within one year10
 
 115
 
 125
Intercompany loans payable within one year22
 
 1
 (23) 
Interest payable80
 
 2
 
 82
Income taxes payable6
 
 6
 
 12
Accrued payroll and incentive compensation22
 
 25
 
 47
Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale
 
 2
 
 2
Other current liabilities70
 
 65
 
 135
Total current liabilities419
 
 610
 (224) 805
Long-term liabilities:         
Long-term debt3,507
 
 77
 
 3,584
Intercompany loans payable190
 ���
 1,114
 (1,304) 
Accumulated losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries in excess of investment668
 171
 
 (839) 
Long-term pension and post employment benefit obligations31
 
 231
 
 262
Deferred income taxes2
 
 9
 
 11
Other long-term liabilities109
 
 68
 
 177
Total liabilities4,926
 171
 2,109
 (2,367) 4,839
Total Hexion Inc. shareholder’s deficit(2,741) (149) (519) 668
 (2,741)
Noncontrolling interest
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Total deficit(2,741) (149) (520) 668
 (2,742)
Total liabilities and deficit$2,185
 $22
 $1,589
 $(1,699) $2,097
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020) (unaudited)

Line ItemAs Previously ReportedAdjustmentsAs Revised
Net (loss) income$(203)$$(195)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes(79)(71)
Other assets, current and non-current(1)(26)(27)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities from continuing operations(11)(26)(37)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities from discontinued operations(1)13 12 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(12)$(13)$(25)
Net short-term debt repayments$(25)$13 $(12)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities$$13 $20 
HEXION INC.Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Three Months Ended September 30, 2020) (unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
Line ItemAs Previously Reported
Adjustment (1)
As Revised
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes$(76)$$(68)
Net (loss) income(102)(94)
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.(102)(94)
DECEMBER 31, 2016Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020) (unaudited)
Line ItemAs Previously Reported
Adjustment (1)
As Revised
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes$(79)$$(71)
Net (loss) income(203)(195)
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.(203)(195)
(1)The $8 adjustment summarized above impacts the “Asset impairments” caption within the financial results table in the Discontinued Operations footnote. The adjustment also impacts “Comprehensive loss” and “Accumulated deficit.”

Hexion Inc. | 118 | 2020 Form 10-K
 Hexion Inc. 
Combined
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Assets         
Current assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $0 and $17, respectively)$28
 $
 $168
 $
 $196
Accounts receivable, net119
 1
 270
 
 390
Intercompany accounts receivable106
 
 60
 (166) 
Intercompany loans receivable
 
 175
 (175) 
Inventories:        
Finished and in-process goods82
 
 117
 
 199
Raw materials and supplies31
 
 57
 
 88
Other current assets26
 
 19
 
 45
Total current assets392
 1
 866
 (341) 918
Investments in unconsolidated entities93
 13
 18
 (106) 18
Deferred income taxes
 
 10
 
 10
Other long-term assets17
 6
 20
 
 43
Intercompany loans receivable1,050
 
 180
 (1,230) 
Property and equipment, net448
 
 445
 
 893
Goodwill65
 
 56
 
 121
Other intangible assets, net41
 
 11
 
 52
Total assets$2,106
 $20
 $1,606
 $(1,677) $2,055
Liabilities and Deficit         
Current liabilities:         
Accounts payable$142
 $
 $226
 $
 $368
Intercompany accounts payable60
 
 106
 (166) 
Debt payable within one year6
 
 101
 
 107
Intercompany loans payable within one year175
 
 
 (175) 
Interest payable69
 
 1
 
 70
Income taxes payable6
 
 7
 
 13
Accrued payroll and incentive compensation28
 
 27
 
 55
Other current liabilities110
 
 49
 
 159
Total current liabilities596
 
 517
 (341) 772
Long-term liabilities:         
Long-term debt3,378
 
 19
 
 3,397
Intercompany loans payable180
 
 1,050
 (1,230) 
Accumulated losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries in excess of investment339
 106
 
 (445) 
Long-term pension and post employment benefit obligations42
 
 204
 
 246
Deferred income taxes4
 
 9
 
 13
Other long-term liabilities105
 
 61
 
 166
Total liabilities4,644
 106
 1,860
 (2,016) 4,594
Total Hexion Inc shareholder’s deficit(2,538) (86) (253) 339
 (2,538)
Noncontrolling interest
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Total deficit(2,538) (86) (254) 339
 (2,539)
Total liabilities and deficit$2,106
 $20
 $1,606
 $(1,677)
$2,055

HEXION INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

Table of Contents
 Hexion Inc. 
Combined
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net sales$1,586
 $
 $2,203
 $(198) $3,591
Cost of sales1,374
 
 1,914
 (198) 3,090
Gross profit212
 
 289
 
 501
Selling, general and administrative expense134
 
 173
 
 307
Asset impairments13
 
 
 
 13
Business realignment costs24
 
 28
 
 52
Other operating expense (income), net3
 (1) 15
 
 17
Operating income38
 1
 73
 
 112
Interest expense, net315
 
 14
 
 329
Intercompany interest (income) expense, net(75) 
 75
 
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt3
 
 
 
 3
Other non-operating (income) expense, net(65) 
 65
 
 
Loss before income tax, (losses) earnings from unconsolidated entities(140) 1
 (81) 
 (220)
Income tax (benefit) expense(7) 
 25
 
 18
(Loss) income before (losses) earnings from unconsolidated entities(133) 1
 (106) 
 (238)
(Losses) earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes(101) (64) 4
 165
 4
Net loss(234) (63) (102) 165
 (234)
Comprehensive loss attributable to Hexion Inc.$(203) $(63) $(108) $171
 $(203)


HEXION INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016
 Hexion Inc. 
Combined
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net sales$1,449
 $
 $2,171
 $(182) $3,438
Cost of sales1,370
 
 1,850
 (182) 3,038
Gross profit79
 
 321
 
 400
Selling, general and administrative expense142
 
 186
 
 328
Gain on dispositions(188) 
 (52) 
 (240)
Business realignment costs39
 
 16
 
 55
Other operating expense (income), net18
 5
 (10) 
 13
Operating income (expense)68
 (5) 181
 
 244
Interest expense, net300
 
 10
 
 310
Intercompany interest (income) expense, net(72) 
 72
 
 
Gain on extinguishment of debt(48) 
 
 
 (48)
Other non-operating expense (income), net17
 
 (24) 
 (7)
(Loss) income before income tax, earnings from unconsolidated entities(129)
(5) 123
 
 (11)
Income tax (benefit) expense(3) 
 41
 
 38
(Loss) income before earnings from unconsolidated entities(126) (5) 82
 
 (49)
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes88
 31
 5
 (113) 11
Net (loss) income(38) 26
 87
 (113) (38)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(62) $25
 $66
 $(91) $(62)

HEXION INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
 Hexion Inc. 
Combined
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net sales$1,715
 $
 $2,603
 $(178) $4,140
Cost of sales1,528
 
 2,190
 (178) 3,540
Gross profit187
 
 413
 
 600
Selling, general and administrative expense134
 
 172
 
 306
Asset impairments
 
 6
 
 6
Business realignment costs7
 
 9
 
 16
Other operating expense (income), net16
 
 (4) 
 12
Operating income30
 
 230
 
 260
Interest expense, net317
 
 9
 
 326
Intercompany interest (income) expense, net(80) 
 80
 
 
Gain on extinguishment of debt(41) 
 
 
 (41)
Other non-operating expense (income), net94
 
 (97) 
 (3)
(Loss) income before income tax, earnings from unconsolidated entities(260)

 238
 
 (22)
Income tax (benefit) expense(2) 
 36
 
 34
(Loss) income before earnings from unconsolidated entities(258) 
 202
 
 (56)
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes218
 132
 1
 (334) 17
Net (loss) income(40) 132
 203
 (334) (39)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest


 (1) 
 (1)
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(40) $132
 $202
 $(334) $(40)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Hexion Inc.$(128) $133
 $156
 $(289) $(128)

HEXION INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

 Hexion Inc. 
Combined
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities$(278) $
 $126
 $(1) $(153)
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities         
Capital expenditures(40) 
 (77) 
 (117)
Capitalized interest
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Proceeds from sale of assets, net5
 
 3
 
 8
Change in restricted cash
 
 1
 
 1
Return of capital from subsidiary from sales of accounts receivable182
(a)
 
 (182) 
 147
 
 (74) (182) (109)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities         
Net short-term debt repayments3
 
 18
 
 21
Borrowings of long-term debt1,053
 
 376
 
 1,429
Repayments of long-term debt(921) 
 (330) 
 (1,251)
Net intercompany loan borrowings (repayments)1
 
 (1) 
 
Common stock dividends paid
 
 (1) 1
 
Deferred financing fees paid(20) 
 (5) 
 (25)
Return of capital to parent from sales of accounts receivable
 
 (182)(a)182
 
 116
 
 (125) 183
 174
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
 
 6
 
 6
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents(15) 
 (67) 
 (82)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year (including restricted cash of $0 and $17, respectively)28
 
 151
 
 179
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year (including restricted cash of $0 and $18, respectively)$13
 $
 $84
 $
 $97
(a)During the year ended December 31, 2017, Hexion Inc. contributed receivables of $182 to a non-guarantor subsidiary as capital contributions, resulting in a non-cash transaction. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the non-guarantor subsidiary sold the contributed receivables to certain banks under various supplier financing agreements. The cash proceeds were returned to Hexion Inc. by the non-guarantor subsidiary as a return of capital. The sale of receivables has been included within cash flows from operating activities on the Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries. The return of the cash proceeds from the sale of receivables has been included as a financing outflow and an investing inflow on the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries and Hexion Inc., respectively.

HEXION INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016
 Hexion Inc. 
Combined
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities$(202) $4
 $182
 $(4) $(20)
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities         
Capital expenditures(67) 
 (73) 
 (140)
Capitalized interest(1) 
 
 
 (1)
Proceeds from dispositions, net147
 
 134
 
 281
Cash received on buyer’s note75
 
 
 
 75
Proceeds from sale of assets, net
 
 5
 
 5
Change in restricted cash
 
 (9) 
 (9)
Capital contribution to subsidiary(13) (9) 
 22
 
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates, net(1) 
 
 
 (1)
Return of capital from subsidiary from sales of accounts receivable95
(a)
 
 (95) 
 235
 (9) 57
 (73) 210
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities         
Net short-term debt repayments(1) 
 (21) 
 (22)
Borrowings of long-term debt360
 
 284
 
 644
Repayments of long-term debt(601) 
 (255) 
 (856)
Net intercompany loan borrowings (repayments)176
 
 (176) 
 
Capital contribution from parent
 9
 13
 (22) 
Common stock dividends paid
 (4) 
 4
 
Deferred financing fees paid(1) 
 
 
 (1)
Return of capital to parent from sales of accounts receivable
 
 (95)(a)95
 
 (67) 5
 (250) 77
 (235)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents(34) 
 (15) 
 (49)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year (including restricted cash of $0 and $8, respectively)62
 
 166
 
 228
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year (including restricted cash of $0 and $17, respectively)$28
 $
 $151
 $
 $179
(a)During the year ended December 31, 2016, Hexion Inc. contributed receivables of $95 to a non-guarantor subsidiary as capital contributions, resulting in a non-cash transaction. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the non-guarantor subsidiary sold the contributed receivables to certain banks under various supplier financing agreements. The cash proceeds were returned to Hexion Inc. by the non-guarantor subsidiary as a return of capital. The sale of receivables has been included within cash flows from operating activities on the Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries. The return of the cash proceeds from the sale of receivables has been included as a financing outflow and an investing inflow on the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries and Hexion Inc., respectively.

HEXION INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
 Hexion Inc. 
Combined
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities$(295) $19
 $508
 $(19) $213
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities         
Capital expenditures(91) 
 (84) 
 (175)
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Capitalized interest(3) 
 (1) 
 (4)
Proceeds from sale of investments, net
 
 6
 
 6
Change in restricted cash
 
 8
 
 8
Proceeds from sale of assets
 
 17
 
 17
Capital contribution to subsidiary(25) (17) 
 42
 
Return of capital from subsidiary from sales of accounts receivable278
(a)
 
 (278) 
 159
 (17) (61) (236) (155)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities         
Net short-term debt repayments
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Borrowings of long-term debt500
 
 23
 
 523
Repayments of long-term debt(445) 
 (40) 
 (485)
Net intercompany loan borrowings (repayments)131
 
 (131) 
 
Capital contribution from parent
 17
 25
 (42) 
Long-term debt and credit facility financing fees(11) 
 
 
 (11)
Common stock dividends paid
 (19) 
 19
 
Return of capital to parent from sales of accounts receivable
 
 (278)(a)278
 
 175

(2)
(404)
255

24
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents39



33



72
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year (including restricted cash of $0 and $16, respectively)23
 
 133
 
 156
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year (including restricted cash of $0 and $8, respectively)$62
 $
 $166
 $
 $228
(a)During the year ended December 31, 2015, Hexion Inc. contributed receivables of $278 to a non-guarantor subsidiary as capital contributions, resulting in a non-cash transaction. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the non-guarantor subsidiary sold the contributed receivables to certain banks under various supplier financing agreements. The cash proceeds were returned to Hexion Inc. by the non-guarantor subsidiary as a return of capital. The sale of receivables has been included within cash flows from operating activities on the Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries. The return of the cash proceeds from the sale of receivables has been included as a financing outflow and an investing inflow on the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries and Hexion Inc., respectively.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


TotheBoard of Directors and ShareholdersShareholder of
Hexion Inc.


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidatedbalance sheets of Hexion Inc.and its subsidiaries (Successor) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, of comprehensive loss, deficit(loss) income, of equity (deficit) and of cash flows for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2017,2020 and for the period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, including the related notes and financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts for the year ended December 31, 2020 and for the period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019 listed in the accompanying index appearing under Item 8 (collectively referred to as the “consolidatedfinancial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidatedfinancial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Companyas ofDecember 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 20172020 and for the period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Change inBasis of Accounting Principle


As discussed in Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the district of Delaware confirmed the Company's Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Hexion Holdings LLC and its Debtor Affiliates under Chapter 11 (the "plan") on June 25, 2019. Confirmation of the plan resulted in the discharge of all claims against the Company changedthat arose before April 1, 2019and terminates all rights and interests of equity security holders as provided for in the manner in which it accounts for goodwill impairments in 2017.plan. The plan was substantially consummated on July 1, 2019and the Company emerged from bankruptcy. In connection with its emergence from bankruptcy, theCompany adopted fresh start accounting as of July 1, 2019.


Basis for Opinion


These consolidatedfinancial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidatedfinancial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits of these consolidatedfinancial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidatedfinancial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.


Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidatedfinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidatedfinancial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidatedfinancial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to theconsolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidatedfinancial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Goodwill Impairment Assessments – Forest Products and Versatics Reporting Units

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill balance from continuing operations was $164 million as of December 31, 2020, including $127 million related to the Forest Products (“FPD”) reporting unit and $36 million related to the Versatics reporting unit. Management tests goodwill annually for impairment of value or more frequently when potential impairment triggering events are present. Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. Management uses a weighted market and income approach to estimate the fair value of its reporting units. Management’s market approach is based on the EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiple technique. Management’s income approach is based on a discounted cash flow model. The key assumptions and estimates utilized in the market and income approaches primarily include market multiples, discount rates, and future levels of revenue growth and operating margins.


Hexion Inc. | 119 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment assessments of the FPD and Versatics reporting units is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when determining the fair value estimates of the reporting units; (ii) the high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating the significant assumptions used in management’s fair value estimates related to market multiples, discount rates, and future levels of revenue growth and operating margins; and (iii) the audit effort involved in the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for determining the fair value estimates of the FPD and Versatics reporting units; (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the weighted market and income approaches; (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the market and income approaches; and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related to market multiples, discount rates, and future levels of revenue growth and operating margins. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to the future levels of revenue growth and operating margins involved evaluating whether the assumptions were reasonable considering (i) current and past performance of the reporting units; (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data; and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating (i) the appropriateness of the weighted market and income approaches and (ii) the reasonableness of significant assumptions related to the market multiples and the discount rates.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Columbus, Ohio
March 10, 2021

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2005.

Hexion Inc. | 120 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Hexion Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive (loss) income, of equity (deficit) and of cash flows of Hexion Inc. and its subsidiaries (Predecessor) (the “Company”) for the period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes and schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts for the period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2018 listed in the index appearing under Item 8 (collectively referred to as the “consolidatedfinancial statements”). In our opinion, theconsolidatedfinancial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of the Company’s operations and its cash flows for the period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2018in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis of Accounting

As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidatedfinancial statements, the Company, Hexion Holdings LLC, Hexion LLC and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries filed petitions on April 1, 2019 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the district of Delaware for reorganization under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company’s Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Hexion Holdings LLC and its Debtor Affiliates under Chapter 11was substantially consummated on July 1, 2019 and the Company emerged from bankruptcy. In connection with its emergence from bankruptcy, theCompany adopted fresh start accounting.

Changes in Accounting Principles

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for revenues from contracts with customers in 2018.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidatedfinancial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidatedfinancial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidatedfinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidatedfinancial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 2, 20183, 2020, except for the effects of discontinued operations discussed in Note 4 and the change in composition of reportable segments discussed in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is March 10, 2021


We have served as the Company's auditor since 2005.

Hexion Inc. | 121 | 2020 Form 10-K


Table of Contents
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
DescriptionBalance at
Beginning
of Period
Additions
Deductions(2)
Balance at
End of
Period
Charged
to cost and
expenses(1)
Charged
to other
accounts
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
Successor
Year Ended December 31, 2020$$$— $(1)$
Period from July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019— — (2)
Predecessor
Period from January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019$16 $— $— $(16)$— 
Year Ended December 31, 201819 — — (3)16 
Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E
Description 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 Additions Deductions 
Balance at
End of
Period
Charged
to cost and
expenses(1)
 
Charged
to other
accounts
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:          
Year Ended December 31, 2017 $17
 $3
 $
 $(1) $19
Year ended December 31, 2016 15
 3
 
 (1) 17
Year ended December 31, 2015 14
 1
 
 
 15
Reserve for Obsolete Inventory:          
Year Ended December 31, 2017 $9
 $4
 $
 $(4) $9
Year ended December 31, 2016 7
 9
 
 (7) 9
Year ended December 31, 2015 8
 4
 
 (5) 7
(1)Includes the impact of foreign currency translation.
(1)Includes the impact of foreign currency translation.
(2)Deductions for the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 include the elimination of the predecessor allowance for doubtful accounts in conjunction with the application of fresh start accounting as described in Note 6 in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we, under the supervision and with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We have assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2020. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment, we have concluded that, as of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been noDuring the three months ended December 31, 2020, we continued to transition certain of our information technology, procurement administration, accounting and finance functions to our new third party business services partner. We expect to be fully transitioned in early 2021. No other changes occurred in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation described above in “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” that occurred during the Company’s fourthmost recent fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B - OTHER INFORMATION
None.

Hexion Inc. | 122 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents

PART III
ITEM 10 - DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons
The supervision of our management and the general course of the Company’s affairs and business operations is entrusted to the Board of ManagersDirectors of our indirect parent, Hexion Holdings LLC (“Hexion Holdings”).Holdings.
Set forth below are the names, ages and current positions of our executive officers and the members of the Hexion Holdings Board of ManagersDirectors as ofof March 1, 2018.
2021.
NameAgePosition
Craig A. Rogerson6164 
Director, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Patrick J. Bartels45 Director
Jeffrey D. Benjamin59 Director
James N. Chapman58 Director
Joaquin Delgado61 Director
Carol S. Eicher62 Director
Michael J. Shannon61 Director
John K. Wulff72 Director
Stephen D. Newlin68 Director
George F. Knight6164 
Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dr. William H. JoyceDouglas A. Johns8263 
Director
Robert Kalsow-Ramos32
Director
Scott M. Kleinman45
Director
Geoffrey A. Manna56
Director
Dr. Jonathan D. Rich62
Director
Samuel Feinstein34
Director
Marvin O. Schlanger69
Director
Joseph P. Bevilaqua62
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating OfficerGeneral Counsel
John P. Auletto5255 
Executive Vice President – Human Resources
Nathan E. Fisher5255 
Executive Vice President – Procurement
DouglasMatthew A. JohnsSokol6048 
Executive Vice President - Chief Administrative Officer
Paul G. Barletta62 Executive Vice President and General Counsel- Operations
Karen E. KosterAnn Frederix5556 
ExecutiveSenior Vice President – Environmental, Health & SafetyGeneral Manager, Global Epoxies
Matthew A. SokolMark Alness4566 
Executive Senior Vice President, - Business Development and Strategy
Global Resins
Craig A. Rogerson was elected Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company and Hexion Holdings LLC effective July 9, 2017.2017 and of Hexion Holdings Corporation in July 2019. He served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chemtura Corporation from December 2008 to April 2017. He was President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Hercules Incorporated from December 2003 to November 2008. Mr. Rogerson joined Hercules in 1979 and served in a number of management positions, including President of the FiberVisions and Pinova Divisions, Vice President of Global Procurement and Chief Operating Officer. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Wacker Silicones Corporation from 1997-2000. In May 2000, he rejoined Hercules and became President of its BetzDearborn division in August 2000. Mr. Rogerson is an independent Chair of the board of PPL Corporation and serves on the boards of PPL Corporation, the American Chemistry Council, the Society of Chemical Industry, and the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network. He also serves on the AdvisoryAlumni board of the Michigan State University College of Engineering and on the Advisory board of the MSU Chemical Engineering & Materials Science College. For Hexion Holdings Corporation, he serves on the Listing Committee.

Patrick J. Bartels is the Managing Member of Redan Advisors LLC, a firm that provides fiduciary services, including board of director representation and strategic planning advisory services for domestic and international public and private business entities. Prior to founding Redan Advisors LLC, Mr. Bartels was a senior investment professional with 20 years of experience. His professional experience includes investing in complex financial restructurings and process-intensive situations in North America, Asia and Europe in a broad universe of industries and he has served as a director on numerous public and private boards of directors. Mr. Bartels currently serves on the board of directors of Arch Resources, Inc. and Monitronics International, Inc. From 2002 to December 2018, Mr. Bartels served as a Managing Principal at Monarch Alternative Capital LP, a private investment firm that focused primarily on event-driven credit opportunities. Prior to Monarch, he served as Research Analyst for high yield investments at INVESCO, where he analyzed primary and secondary debt offerings of companies in various industries. Mr. Bartels began his career at Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, where he was a Certified Public Accountant. He holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation. For Hexion Holdings Corporation, he serves on the Audit, Listing and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees.

Jeffrey D. Benjamin has been Senior Advisor to Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. from 2008 to the present. He is currently Chairman of A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. since 2014, and he has been on the American Airlines Group Inc. board since 2013. He has also been on the board of Rackspace Technology Inc. since 2016. Past Directorships and Committees include Chemtura Corp., Caesar’s Entertainment Corp., Exco Resources, Inc. (Chairman), and Spectrum Group International. Private Directorships consist of ImOn Communications LLC (Chairman), Involta LLC and Shutterfly, Inc. He has executive leadership experience in the investment industry, including UBS Securities LLC and Salomon Brothers Inc. For Hexion Holdings Corporation, he is Lead Director, Chair of the Compensation Committee and serves on the Audit and Listing Committees.


Hexion Inc. | 123 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
James N. Chapman is a non-executive Advisory Director of SkyWorks Capital, LLC and serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Arch Resources, Inc. (NYSE: ARCH), California Resources Corporation (NYSE: CRC) and Denbury, Inc. (NYSE: DEN) as well as Eco-Bat Technologies, LLC and Neenah Enterprises, Inc. Previously, he has served on numerous other public and private boards, including AerCap NV, American Media, Inc., Bennu Oil & Gas, LLC, Broadview Networks Inc., Chrysler LLC, CSC ServiceWorks, Inc., Hayes- Lemmerz, Inc., Jack Cooper, Inc., National/Alamo Rental Car, Inc., SSA Global, Inc., Teleglobe, Inc., Tembec, Inc. and Tower International, Inc. Mr. Chapman has also previously worked for Regiment Capital Advisors, LP, The Renco Group, Inc. and was a founding principal of Fieldstone Private Capital Group. Prior to joining Fieldstone, Mr. Chapman worked for Bankers Trust Company. He has been a capital markets and strategic planning consultant with over 35 years of investment banking experience in a wide range of industries including aviation, mining, energy, automotive and general manufacturing. For Hexion Holdings Corporation, he is Chair of the Listing Committee, and serves on the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.

Joaquín Delgado worked at 3M Company from 1987 until his retirement in July 2019. He most recently served as Executive Vice President since July 2009, having operating responsibility for three Business Groups consecutively: Electro-Communications Business Group, Health Care Business Group and Consumer Business Group. He has been on the Board of Directors of Stepan Company from 2011 to present, serving on all Committees. He also serves on the Ballet Austin Board of Directors and also on the Executive Committee. In addition, Dr. Delgado serves as a member of Board of Trustees of Goldman Sachs Trust and Goldman Sachs Variable Insurance Trust. Dr. Delgado has a PhD in polymer science and engineering from Lehigh University. For Hexion Holdings Corporation, he serves on the Environmental Health & Safety Committee and on the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee.

Carol S. Eicher is a Director, Chair of the Governance Committee and member of the Compensation Committee of Tennant Co. and a Director, Chair of the Governance Committee and member of the Audit Committee of Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. She is also a Director and member of the Governance Committee of Arconic Corp. Previously, she was a Director of A. Schulman Co. and President, CEO and Director of Innocor, Inc. She also held senior management positions with Dow Chemical Co., Rohm and Haas Co., Ashland, Inc. and E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. She has been in the chemical industry since 1979 and has extensive experience with operating leadership positions in the industry. For Hexion Holdings Corporation, she is Chair of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee and serves on the Environmental Health & Safety Committee.

Michael J. Shannon is a board member of Quaker Houghton (KWR), serving on the Audit Committee since Aug 2019 and the Sustainability Committee since 2020. Mr. Shannon is the former Chief Executive Officer and a board member of Houghton International Inc. and served in these roles since his appointment in December 2015. Immediately prior to this appointment, Mr. Shannon served as Chief Operating Officer responsible for all global commercial and operational activities. Previously, Mr. Shannon spent 24 years at Ashland Inc. as a Corporate Officer and President of Global Supply Chain and Senior VP of the Performance Materials Group. He has also served on the board of Reichhold, Inc. Mr. Shannon has a BS in Chemical Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania and an MBA from Temple University. For Hexion Holdings Corporation, he is Chair of the Environmental Health & Safety Committee and serves on the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee.

John K. Wulff serves on the Board of Directors of Celanese Corporation (Chairman, Audit Committee, and as of February 2021, moved from membership on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to the Environmental, Health, Safety Public policy and Quality Committee), and of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (Member, Audit and Compensation Committees). Mr. Wulff is the former Chairman of the Board of Hercules Inc. and, in the past five years, has served on the boards and committees of Moody's Corp. and of Chemtura Corp. He has also served as a member of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), CFO of Union Carbide Corp, a partner of KPMG LLP, and officer of other governance and financial organizations. He has substantial chemical industry, strategy and financial expertise. For Hexion Holdings Corporation, he is Chair of the Audit Committee and serves on the Compensation Committee.

Stephen D. Newlin is non-executive Chairman of Oshkosh Corp. and he serves as a director on the Univar Solutions (UNVR) board. He served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Univar from 2016-2018 after being elected to the board in 2014. Mr. Newlin previously served as Executive Chairman of the Board of PolyOne Corp. (POL) from 2014-2016, and Chairman, President and CEO of PolyOne from 2006-2014, following 27 years at Nalco and Ecolab (now merged). At Nalco he became President, COO and Vice-Chair, and at Ecolab he was President of Ecolab's Industrial Sector. In addition, he has held previous board positions at Chemours Corporation (CC), The National Association of Manufacturers and others. For Hexion Holdings Corporation, he serves on the Compensation and the Environmental Health & Safety Committees.

George F. Knight was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer andof the Company effective January 1, 2016. From 2016 to July 2019 he was also a director of the Company and Hexion Holdings effective January 1, 2016.Holdings. He served as Senior Vice President - Finance and Treasurer of the Company from June 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015, having been Vice President, Finance and Treasurer since July 2002. He has also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and a director of Hexion Holdings since January 1, 2016. Mr. Knight also served as Senior Vice President-Finance and Treasurer for MPM and Hexion Holdings from October 1, 2010 and November 1, 2010, respectively, until December 31, 2015. Mr. Knight joined the Company in 1997 and served until 1999 as Director and then Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions - Finance for Borden, Inc. From 1999-2001 he served as Vice President of Finance for Borden Foods Corporation.
Dr. William H. Joyce has been a member of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings since October 1, 2010. Since 2008, Dr. Joyce has been the Chairman and CEO of Advanced Fusion Systems. He is the retired, former chief executive officer and chairman of Nalco Holding Company, positions he held from November 2003 until his retirement in December 2007. Prior to his appointment as chief executive officer and chairman of Nalco Company, Dr. Joyce served as chief executive officer and chairman at Hercules Incorporated and prior to that at Union Carbide. Dr. Joyce holds a B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from Penn State University, and M.B.A. and Ph.D. degrees from New York University. Dr. Joyce received the National Medal of Technology Award in 1993 from President Clinton, the Plastics Academy’s Lifetime Achievement Award in 1997, and the Society of Chemical Industry Perkin Medal Award in 2003. Dr. Joyce also serves as a trustee and Vice Chairman of the Universities Research Association and is a board leadership fellow of the National Association of Corporate Directors. During the past five years, he also served on the board of directors of El Paso Corporation, CVS Caremark Corporation, and Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Inc. He is a Chair of the Environmental, Health and Safety committee of the Hexion Holdings LLC Board of Managers. Dr. Joyce’s extensive management experience, and his skills in business leadership and strategy, qualify him to serve on the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings.

Robert Kalsow-Ramos was elected a member of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings on October 27, 2014. Mr. Kalsow-Ramos is a Principal in Apollo Global Management’s Private Equity Group, where he has worked since 2010. Prior to joining Apollo, Mr. Kalsow-Ramos was a member of the Transportation Investment Banking Group at Morgan Stanley from 2008 to 2010. He also serves on the Board of Directors of MPM Holdings Inc. and West Corporation, which are affiliated with Apollo. Mr. Kalsow-Ramos was previously a director of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation. He is Chair of the Hexion Holdings Board of Managers’ Compensation Committee, Chair of its Audit Committee and a member of its Executive Committee.  In light of our ownership structure and Mr. Kalsow-Ramos’ extensive finance and business experience, we believe it is appropriate for Mr. Kalsow-Ramos to serve on the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings.
Scott M. Kleinman served as a director of the Company from February 12, 2014 to October 27, 2014. He was elected a member of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings on October 1, 2010. Mr. Kleinman is Co-President of Apollo Global Management, LLC, sharing responsibility for all of Apollo’s revenue-generating and investing businesses. Mr. Kleinman focuses on Apollo’s equity and opportunistic business. Mr. Kleinman joined Apollo in 1996, and in 2009 he was named Lead Partner for Private Equity. Prior to joining Apollo, Mr. Kleinman was a member of the Investment Banking division at Smith Barney Inc. Mr. Kleinman also serves on the Board of Directors of the following companies affiliated with Apollo: MPM Holdings Inc., Vectra Corp., and Constellis Holdings, LLC. Mr. Kleinman has previously been a director of CH2M Hill Companies, Ltd., Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, Realogy Holdings Corp., Lyondell Basell Industries N.V., Taminco Corporation, and Verso Corporation. He is a member of the Compensation Committee and Chair of the Executive Committee of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings. In light of our ownership structure and Mr. Kleinman's position with Apollo and his extensive finance and business experience, we believe it is appropriate for Mr. Kleinman to serve on the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings.
Geoffrey A. Manna was elected a director of the Company on September 30, 2013 and served until October 27, 2014 at which time he resigned and was elected a member of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings. Since May 2017 he has been Managing Director for CION Investments, a multi-billion AUM alternative asset manager focused on credit strategies, where he is a senior member of the investment team. From 2008 to 2017, he served as an independent consultant principally focused on financial advisory and interim management engagements such as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer oriented roles for companies ranging from small middle market to multi-billion market capitalization public companies across several industry sectors, including media, healthcare, building products and energy distribution & logistics. He served in management and operating roles in leveraged finance and investment banking from 1995 to 2008. From June 2006 to June 2008 he served as Managing Director for The Royal Bank of Scotland. From June 2004 to June 2006 he served as Managing Director for BNP Paribas. From July 1999 to June 2004 he served as Chief Operating Officer-Financial Sponsors Group and Director for Credit Suisse First Boston. From July 1995 to July 1999 he served as Vice President for Deutsche Bank and its predecessor companies Bankers Trust Company and BT Securities. Prior to that, from July 1991 to January 1994 he held the position of Director-Finance for US WEST Capital where he directed financial management and merger and acquisition projects. Before that, he was employed at KPMG for eight years as a Senior Manager and managed over 50 audit engagements and special projects for major public and private companies, including General Electric and GE Capital Corporation. Mr. Manna also serves on the Board of Directors of Conisus Holdings, Inc. Until his resignation, Mr. Manna served as a member of the Company’s Audit Committee. He currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings. Mr. Manna’s extensive experience in finance and business qualifies him to serve on the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings.
Dr. Jonathan D. Rich has been a member of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings since October 1, 2010 where he serves on the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee. Dr. Rich has been a director, chief executive officer and chairman of the board of Berry Global Group Inc. since February 2017. He was previously a director, chief executive officer and Chairman of Berry Plastics Group Inc. from October 2010 to January 2017. Beginning in 2002, Dr. Rich was President, North American Tire-Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, and chairman of the board, Goodyear Dunlop Tires NA. At Goodyear, he had previously served as Director, Chemical R&D and as president of Goodyear Chemical. Dr. Rich began his career at GEDeloitte & Touche after earning a Master’s Degree in 1982 as a research chemist with Corporate R&D and progressed through a seriesAccounting at Syracuse University.


Hexion Inc. | 124 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of management positions to become Manager of Operational Excellence at GE Silicones from 1996 to 1998. He was then promoted to Technical Director, GE Bayer Silicones in Germany from 1998 to 2000. He served as a director of MPM and MPM Holdings, and as president and chief executive officer from June 2007 to October 2010. Dr. Rich’s previous officer and director positions, his extensive management experience, and his skills in business leadership and strategy, qualify him to serve on the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings.Contents
Samuel Feinstein was elected a member of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings on November 2, 2016. He has been an investment professional in Apollo’s private equity business since 2007 and was previously a member of the Investment Banking Group at Morgan Stanley from September 2005 to May 2007. Mr. Feinstein currently serves on the board of CEVA Holdings LLC, Vectra Co., MPM Holdings, Inc., and Pinnacle Agriculture Holdings, LLC. Within the past five years, he has served on the board of directors of Taminco Corporation. He is a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings. In light of our ownership structure and his extensive finance and business experience, we believe it is appropriate for Mr. Feinstein to serve on the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings.

Marvin O. Schlanger was appointed a member of the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings on October 1, 2010 and serves on the Board’s Environmental, Health and Safety Committee. Prior to that, Mr. Schlanger served as Vice Chair on the Board of Managers of Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. from June 2005 to October 2010. Since October 1998, Mr. Schlanger has been a principal in the firm of Cherry Hill Chemical Investments, LLC, which provides management services and capital to the chemical and allied industries. Prior to October 1998, he held various positions with ARCO Chemical Company, serving as President and Chief Executive Officer from May 1998 to July 1998 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 to May 1998. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Resolution Performance Products LLC and RPP Capital Corporation from November 2000 and Chairman of Resolution Specialty Materials Company from August 2004 until the formation of Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. in May 2005. Mr. Schlanger is also a director and the Chairman of the Board of CEVA Group Plc, UGI Corporation and UGI Utilities Inc., and a director of Amerigas Partners, LP, Vectra Corporation, and MPM Holdings Inc. Mr. Schlanger was formerly Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Lyondell Basell Industries N.V. and Chairman of Covalence Specialty Materials Corp. Mr. Schlanger’s extensive finance and business experience qualifies him to serve on the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings.
Joseph P. Bevilaqua was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company effective October 5, 2016. Until this appointment, he served as Executive Vice President and President of the Company’s Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins Division. Since August 10, 2008, he has been responsible for the epoxy and phenolic resins businesses and in October 2010, the coatings business was added to his division responsibilities. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President and President of the Phenolic and Forest Products Division, a position he held from January 2004 to August 2008. Mr. Bevilaqua joined the Company in April 2002 as Vice President-Corporate Strategy and Development. From February 2000 to March 2002, he was the Vice President and General Manager of Alcan’s global plastics packaging business. Prior to Alcan, Mr. Bevilaqua served in leadership positions with companies such as General Electric, Woodbridge Foam Corporation and Russell-Stanley Corporation.
John P. Auletto was elected Executive Vice President - Human Resources effective May 15, 2016. Mr. Auletto joined the Company in September 1999 as Director of Human Resources for the Performance Resins Group. Since then he has held various positions with increasing responsibilities in human resources, including most recently, Vice President - Human Resources for the Epoxy, Phenolic and Coating Resins Division from April 2013 to May 15, 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Auletto served in human resources roles with Associates National Bank, W.L. Gore & Associates, and The Bank of New York.
Nathan E. Fisher was elected Executive Vice President - Procurement of the Company on June 1, 2005. He also serves as Executive Vice President - Procurement of Momentive Performance Materials Inc., having been elected to that position on October 1, 2010. Mr. Fisher joined the Company in March 2003 as Director of Strategic Sourcing and was promoted to Vice President - Global Sourcing in September 2004.
Douglas A. Johns joined the Company on May 9, 2015 but had served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel under the Shared Services Agreement with MPM since October 1, 2010. He also serves as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Hexion Holdings. Mr. Johns was employed by Momentive Performance Materials Inc., serving as its General Counsel and Secretary from its formation on December 4, 2006 until October 24, 2014. Prior to that time, Mr. Johns served as General Counsel for GE Advanced Materials, a division of the General Electric Company from 2004 to December 2006. Mr. Johns began his career as a trial lawyer at the U.S. Department of Justice and was in private practice before joining GE in 1991, where he served as Senior Counsel for global regulatory and environmental matters and Senior Business Counsel at GE Plastics’ European headquarters in Bergen Op Zoom, The Netherlands from 2001 to 2004. He graduated with honors from Oberlin College, and holds an MBA from University of Massachusetts, Amherst and a JD from Northeastern University School of Law.
Karen E. Koster
John P. Auletto was elected Executive Vice President-Environmental, Health & Safety ofPresident - Human Resources effective May 15, 2016. Mr. Auletto joined the Company effective August 8, 2011in September 1999 as Director of Human Resources for the Performance Resins Group. Since then he has held various positions with increasing responsibilities in human resources, including most recently, Vice President- Human Resources for the Epoxy, Phenolic and the same position for Hexion Holdings on October 27, 2014. Ms. Koster also served in that capacity for Momentive Performance Materials Inc.Coating Resins Division from August 8, 2011April 2013 to DecemberMay 15, 2014.2016. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Koster held various environmental servicesMr. Auletto served in human resources roles with Associates National Bank, W.L. Gore & Associates, and legal management roles at Cytec Industries where, from August 2002, sheThe Bank of New York.

Nathan E. Fisher was elected Executive Vice President - Procurement of the Company on June 1, 2005. He served as Executive Vice President Safety, Health- Procurement of Momentive Performance Materials Inc., having been elected to that position on October 1, 2010 and Environment.ending on 12/31/2019. Mr. Fisher joined the Company in March 2003 as Director of Strategic Sourcing and was promoted to Vice President - Global Sourcing in September 2004.Previously, Mr. Fisher worked in Procurement Management and Supply Chain at Eastman Chemical and as in industrial engineering at Texas Instruments. He earned a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from Tennessee Technological University and a master’s degree in business administration from East Tennessee State University.

Matthew A. Sokol has been Chief Administrative Officer of the Company since February 21, 2019. He joined the Company in November 2017 as Executive Vice President, Business Development and Strategy. Mr. Sokol joined the Companycame from Lanxess Solutions, Inc. (formerly Chemtura Corporation), where he served as interimInterim Vice President of HR and M&A (NAFTA) for Lanxess. Mr. Sokol joined Chemtura in October 2005 and held a number of senior leadership roles including leading M&A, which ultimately culminated in the sale of the company to Lanxess in April 2017. Previous roles at Chemtura included: Head of Corporate Development & Investor Relations; General Manager, Flame Retardants; and Director, Strategic Corporate Development. While at Chemtura, Mr. Sokol also served as Associate General Counsel, IEP Segment, and Assistant General Counsel. Prior to Chemtura, Mr. Sokol served as senior litigation associate at Tyler, Cooper & Alcon, LLP from September 1999 to October 2005.

Paul G. Barletta was elected Executive Vice President of Operations of the Company as of February 2019. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President, Environmental Health and Safety and Global Epoxy Manufacturing in 2018. From 2005 to 2018 he held various management roles including Vice President of Global Epoxy Manufacturing. He has been at Hexion since its formation in 2005. His previous experience also includes Site Manager at Resolution Performance Products, Inc. from 2000 to 2005 and its predecessor company, Shell Chemical. He joined Shell in 1980 and has held a variety of roles in manufacturing including Engineering, Production, Maintenance, EHS, Manufacturing Excellence, Quality, and Special Projects. He served on the Louisiana Chemical Association Board of Directors from 2006 to 2019. He holds a BS in Chemical Engineering from Wayne State University.

Ann Frederix has 30 years of experience in the chemical industry. She has been with Hexion from its formation in 2005, and has been Senior Vice President and General Manager, Global Epoxy & Versatics since June 2019. She was Vice President Epoxy Specialties from 2016 to 2019 and was Business Director and Global Marketing Manager from 2009 to 2014. Her previous experience also includes Technology Director Europe at Resolution Performance Products and Manager at Hexion’s predecessor company Shell Chemicals. In her current role, she is responsible for developing and executing strategy for the Business. Dr. Frederix earned a PhD in organic chemistry from Catholic University of Leuven in 1990.

Mark Alness has been Senior Vice President - Global Resins of the Company since July 1, 2019. Throughout his career at Hexion, he has held numerous positions in all segments of the Forest Products business including North America Commercial Director, Global Business Director and Senior Vice President Americas. He joined the Company in June 1978 as a technical service representative in Forest Products Resins. Mr. Alness was hired directly from the University of Minnesota after receiving his Bachelor of Science degree in Forest Product Engineering.
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
Since Hexion is a controlled company,Hexion’s indirect parent, Hexion Holdings, has noutilizes a Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee nor does it(“NomGov Committee”), which is chaired by Ms. Eicher. The Charter for the NomGov Committee is available to shareholders on the Company’s website, located at http://investors.hexion.com/governance-highlights. The NomGov Committee consists of Messrs. Eichel, Shannon, Delgado and Bartels. For purposes of complying with the disclosure requirements of the SEC, we have written proceduresadopted the definition of independence used by the New York Stock Exchange, and under that definition each of the foregoing members of the NomGov Committee is considered independent. The NomGov Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating nominees for director involves assessing candidates’ knowledge relevant to the businesses and industries in which security holders may recommend nomineesthe Company operates, as well as their ability to its Boardcontribute unique and diverse thinking for the benefit of Managers.the Board.

Hexion Inc. | 125 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Since neither Hexion is not aor its indirect parent, Hexion Holdings, are listed issuer,issuers, there are no requirements that Hexion Holdingswe have an independent Audit Committee. However, for purposes of complying with the disclosure requirements of the SEC, we have adopted the definition of independence used by the New York Stock Exchange, and under that definition our Audit Committee is considered independent. Hexion Holdings’ Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Kalsow-Ramos, FeinsteinBartels, Benjamin, Chapman, and Manna,Wulff, each of whom qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.


Code of Conduct
We have a Code of Conduct that applies to all associates, including our Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. These standards are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote the honest and ethical conduct of all employees. Our Code of Conduct is posted on our website: www.hexion.com under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance.” Any substantive amendment to, or waiver from, any provision of the Code of Conduct with respect to any senior executive or financial officer shall be posted on this website.

Hexion Inc. | 126 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we describe our process offor determining the compensation and benefits provided to our “Named Executive Officers” (“NEOs”). and any material compensation and benefits decisions we have made with respect to our NEOs for 2020. Our 20172020 NEOs are
NameTitle & Position
Craig A. RogersonPresident & Chief Executive Officer
George F. KnightExecutive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Douglas A. JohnsExecutive Vice President & General Counsel
Ann FrederixSenior Vice President and General Manager, Coatings & Composites
Mark I. AlnessSenior Vice President and General Manager, Global Adhesives

Executive Summary

Fiscal 2020 Company Performance

Despite negative COVID-19 economic headwinds in the first half of 2020, Hexion showed consecutive quarter over quarter growth in the second half of 2020 due to recovering economic demand in many key end markets as we recovered from the global pandemic. We also had our highest fourth quarter Segment EBITDA1 from continuing operations in the last seven years. Despite overall softer earnings and the ongoing pandemic in 2020, we were able to generate strong cash flow from operations2 of $116 million and positive free cash flow3 of $8 million in 2020. We exited the year in a strong financial position with significant liquidity of $561 million to support our ongoing business initiatives. In addition to our strong liquidity performance in 2020, we also had strong environmental health & safety (“EH&S”) safety performance for the year.
hsc-20201231_g14.jpg
1    Segment EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) adjusted for certain non-cash items, other income and expenses and discontinued operations. Segment EBITDA is the primary performance measure used by our senior management, the chief operating decision-maker and the board of directors to evaluate operating results and allocate capital resources among segments. For further information, see Note 20 in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and below for reconciliation of net (loss) income to Segment EBITDA.
2    Cash Flow From Operations is defined as the Cash Flow provided by Operating activities for its continuing operations from the Company’s 2020
10-K Consolidated Statement of Cashflow for the year ended December 31, 2020.
3    Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure and is a liquidity measure used by the Company. Free cash flow is defined by the Company as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment.
4    Third Quarter 2019 Segment EBITDA results excludes $18 of previously recorded deferred contract revenue that was accelerated as a result of
the application of fresh start accounting in 2019.
Hexion Inc. | 127 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Human Capital Management
At December 31, 2020, our continuing operations had approximately 2,600employees. Approximately 35% of our employees are members of a labor union or are represented by workers’ councils that have collective bargaining agreements, including most of our European employees. We believe that we have good relations with our union and non-union employees. We believe our diverse global employee talent is a key driver of our future success and competitive advantage. Hexion offers industry competitive salary and benefits, performance incentive plans and enriching career opportunities that enable employee engagement.
hsc-20201231_g15.jpg
At Hexion, We Do the Right Thing. We act ethically and with integrity.

Acting ethically and with integrity is a core value at Hexion. This is a commitment to our company, our customers, our vendors and ourselves. Every associate, regardless of his or her rank or position is responsible for the ethical health of our organization.

Our commitment to acting ethically is non-negotiable.
We treat others with respect – regardless of gender, race, age, orientation or background.
We conduct business with integrity – comply with all anti-trust, anti-bribery, workplace harassment, and conflict-of-interest requirements.
We engage with each other and remind one another of our commitment to act with integrity.
We speak up if we witness misconduct or have a compliance concern.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

We are focused on accelerating our organization’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion worldwide, including developing and implementing a strategy to attract, retain and develop diverse talent and promote an inclusive environment where associates at all levels can perform their best. This is a top priority for us in 2021 and long term. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”(“CEO”); George F. Knight, Executive Vice President has joined with other company’s CEO’s by signing the “CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge”. We also recently hired a Director of Diversity, Equity and Chief Financial Officer (our “CFO”); Joseph P. Bevilaqua, Executive Vice PresidentInclusion to help implement these goals.

At Hexion, Safety is Our Highest Priority. Our work is never more important than performing it safely.

While 2020 was a challenging year for all of us. Hexion’s associates not only endured but stayed focused on serving our customers, operating our manufacturing sites safely and Chief Operating Officer; Douglas A. Johns, Executive Vice Presidentsupporting the communities in which they work and General Counsel; Nathan E. Fisher, Executive Vice President, Global Procurement; Craig O. Morrison, former President and Chief Executive Officer; and Kevin W. McGuire, former Executive Vice President, Business Process & Information Technology.
Messrs. Rogerson, Knight, Bevilaqua, Fisher and Johns are currently executive officerslive. In fact, 2020 was the strongest safety performance on record for Hexion across the majority of the Company. Mr. Morrison retired from the Company on July 9, 2017, and Mr. Rogerson was hired as CEO of the Company effective July 10, 2017. Mr. Rogerson’s employment arrangements are described belowour metrics. In 2020, we operated in the “Employment Agreements” section. Mr. McGuire passed away unexpectedlyAmerican Chemistry Council’s safety Occupational Injury and Illness Rate (“OIIR”) top quartile. This is a result of our multi-year initiative to enhanced training, alignment between our manufacturing and Environmental, Health and Safety teams, and our associates’ commitment to each other to remain vigilant as part of our “Get Zero. Get Home” safety initiative. At Hexion, we are committed to making sure that each associate goes home just as they arrived to work.
During this pandemic, we have implemented additional guidelines to further protect the health and safety of our employees as we continue to operate with our suppliers and customers. We have committed to maintaining a paramount focus on July 29, 2017. Mr. Fisher,the safety of our employees while minimizing potential disruptions caused by COVID-19. For example, we are following all legislatively-mandated travel directives in the various countries where we operate, and we have also put additional travel restrictions in place for our associates designed to reduce the risk from COVID-19. Additionally, we are utilizing extended work from home options to protect our office associates, while adjusting our meeting protocols and processes at our manufacturing sites.

Enhancing worker safety/well-being sustainability goals

In addition to his responsibilities forour future sustainability goals, by 2022, Hexion will offer a voluntary well-being program that addresses associate physical, mental, and financial well-being with the Company, provides servicesgoal of 50% associate participation in the program by 2025. Hexion also re-affirmed its commitment to MPM under the Shared Services Agreement, as did Mr. McGuire until his passing.continue to drive toward zero recordable injuries.
Hexion Inc. | 128 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Oversight of Executive Compensation

The Board of ManagersDirectors of the Company’s parent holding company, Hexion Holdings Corporation, is responsible for governance of the Company, including the responsibility for determining the compensation and benefits of our executive officers. All executive compensation decisions made during 20172020 for our NEOs were made by the Compensation Committee of the Hexion Holdings Corporation Board of ManagersDirectors (the “Committee”).
The Committee sets the principles and strategies that guide the design of our executive compensation program. The Committee annually evaluates the performance and compensation levels of the NEOs. This annual compensation review process includes an evaluation of key objectives and measurable contributions to ensure that incentives are not only aligned with the Company’s strategic goals, but also enable us to attract and retain a highly qualified and effective management team. Based on this evaluation, the Committee approves each executive officer’s compensation level, including base salary, annual incentive opportunities and long-term incentive opportunities.
In order to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices when setting total compensation levels for our NEOs, the Committee considers broad-based competitive market data on total compensation packages provided to executive officers with similar responsibilities at comparable companies. Such companies include those within the chemical industry, as well as those with similar revenues and operational complexity outside the chemical industry. As warranted, the Committee may use data obtained from third-party executive compensation salary surveys such as those published by Willis Towers Watson and AonHewitt when determining appropriate total compensation levels for our NEOs. The Committee retained its own executive compensation consultant, Lyons Benenson & Company, Inc., to review and advise the Committee on the Company’s executive compensation program and practices. In 2020, the specific peer companies used by Lyons Benenson & Company, Inc. were the following:

2020 Peer Companies
AdvanSix Inc.Albemarle CorporationAshland Global Holdings, Inc.
Avient CorporationCelanese CorporationEastman Chemical Company
H.B. Fuller CompanyHuntsman CorporationKraton Corporation
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.NewMarket CorporationOlin Corporation
RPM International Inc.Stepan CompanyThe Chemours Company
Hexion Inc. | 129 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Executive Compensation Objectives and Strategy
Our executive compensation program is designed to set compensation and benefits at a level that is reasonable,appropriate, internally fairequitable and externally competitive. Specifically, the Committee is guided by the following objectives:principles:
Pay for Performance.
PrincipleDescription
Pay for PerformanceWe emphasize pay for performance, as measured by achievement of company operational and financial objectives, and the realization of personal goals. We believe that a significant portion of each executive officer’s total compensation should be variable and contingent upon the achievement of specific and measurable financial and operational performance goals.
Align Incentives with ShareholdersOur executive compensation program is designed to focus our NEOs on our key strategic, financial and operational goals that will translate into long-term value-creation for our shareholders.
Balance Critical Short-Term Objectives and Long-Term StrategyWe believe that the compensation packages we provide to our NEOs should include a mix of short-term, cash-based incentive awards that encourage the achievement of annual goals, and long-term cash and equity elements that reward long-term value-creation for the business.
Attract, Retain and Motivate Top TalentWe design our executive compensation program to be externally competitive in order to attract, retain and motivate the most talented executive officers who will drive company objectives.
Pay for Individual AchievementWe believe that each executive officer’s total compensation should correlate to the scope of his or her responsibilities and relative contributions to the Company’s performance.
CEO Total Direct Compensation

The CEO’s target total direct compensation for 2020 is consistent with our pay for performance based on achievement of company operationalphilosophy and financial objectives and the realization of personal goals. We believe thatfocuses a significant portion on variable compensation that is closely aligned with Company performance. In the chart below, the CEO’s targeted pay mix is compared to the pay mix reflected in actual delivered compensation for 2020. The major difference when comparing target to actual is driven by the annual incentive payout, which was significantly below target based on 2020 performance. Like many other companies in the chemical industry, our revenues were significantly lower in the second quarter due to the worldwide impact of each executive’s total compensation should be variable and contingent upon the achievement of specific and measurable financial and operationalcoronavirus. This reduction in revenues led to EBITDA performance goals.
Align Incentives with Shareholders. Our executive compensation program is designed to focus our NEOs on our key strategic, financial and operational goals that will translate into long-term value-creation for our shareholders.
Balance Critical Short-Term Objectives and Long-Term Strategy. We believe thatmissed the compensation packagestarget we provide to our NEOs should include a mix of short-term, cash-based incentive awards that encourage the achievement of annual goals, and long-term cash and equity elements that reward long-term value-creationhad set for the business.second quarter. While our EBITDA performance in the third and fourth quarters of 2020 was higher than the prior year, it was not enough to fully offset the impact of the second quarter, and led to a 0% payout on the EBITDA portion under our annual incentive plan.
Hexion Inc. | 130 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
Attract, Retain and Motivate Top Talent. We design our executive compensation program to be externally competitive in order to attract, retain and motivate the most talented executive officers who will drive company objectives.
hsc-20201231_g16.jpg
Pay for Individual Achievement. We believe that each executive officer’s total compensation should correlate to the scope of his or her responsibilities and relative contributions to the Company’s performance.



2017hsc-20201231_g17.jpghsc-20201231_g18.jpg
2020 Executive Compensation Updates
On July 9, 2017, Craig Morrison retired from
Mr. Rogerson, the Company after 15 years of service. CraigCompany’s CEO, was on a paid medical leave that began March 25, 2020. Mr. Rogerson returned to full-time work on September 14, 2020, although he was hiredworking on a part-time basis beginning June 22, 2020. Until Mr. Rogerson returned to full-time work, the Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Knight, served as the CEO, effective July 10, 2017, and serves as a member, and Chairman, of the Board. On July 29, 2017, Kevin McGuire passed away unexpectedly. Mr. McGuire was ourCompany’s interim Chief Executive Vice President, Business Processes and IT.Officer.
The Company continued its focus on (i) motivating our NEOs to deliver improved performance and (ii) retaining key talent during difficult business cycles through the use of the goals set in our annual and long term incentive plan and long-term time- and performance-based cash awards made under our long-term incentive plan.plans.

Hexion Inc. | 131 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of Contents
The Committee reviewed the base salaries of our NEOs in the first quarter of the year. After considering the accomplishments of our NEOs, but also considering internal compensation equity dynamics and external market factors, the Committee determined to increase the base salarysalaries of threefour of our NEOs. Consistent with our recent past practice, weWe delivered these annual merit base salary increases effective July 2017.2020, consistent with our recent past practice. Details of the increases can be found in the “Components of Our Executive Compensation Program- Base Salary” section below.
Apollo, as the Company’s controlling shareholder, and its representatives continue to be actively involved in making recommendations regarding the structure of our executive compensation program and the amounts payable to our NEOs. The Company is not currently required to hold a shareholder advisory “say-on-pay” vote.

Evaluating Company and Individual Performance
In determining 2017 compensation, the Committee considered both prior year accomplishments as well as the following accomplishments of our NEOs in 2016:2020:
Mr. Knight, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer: The Committee considered Mr. Knight’s leadership in managing our leveraged balance sheet, his development of talent depth within the Finance organization, and the strong leadership he brings to the management of the shared services agreement with MPM.
Named Executive Officer2020 Accomplishments
Mr. Rogerson
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer

Despite negative COVID-19 economic headwinds in the first half of 2020, led the Company to consecutive quarter over quarter growth in the second half of the year.
Provided key leadership to strategic portfolio optimization efforts during the year.
Led the Company to excellent cash performance for the year despite missing the annual EBITDA goal due to the impact of the global pandemic.
Mr. Knight
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Served as interim CEO and successfully drove initiatives forward.
Provided key leadership to the sale of our Phenolic Specialty Resin, Hexamine and European-based Forest Products Resins businesses.
Provided critical support to significant initiatives including the Company’s global Business Services rollout.
Mr. Johns
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
Provide significant legal support to the Company’s sale of our Phenolic Specialty Resin, Hexamine and European-based Forest Products Resins businesses.
Led the Company’s continued compliance training program.
Provides significant counsel and advice on key strategic business initiatives.
Ms. Frederix
Senior Vice President and
General Manager, Coatings & Composites
Provided key leadership to the Coatings and Composites segment’s recovery from the impact of the global pandemic.
Delivered solid working capital management.
Strong focus on margin improvement.
Mr. Alness
Senior Vice President and
General Manager, Global Adhesives
Established a new product development team and process to deliver on key market opportunities.
Successfully took actions to wind down non-performing business.
Effectively managed operations at a key Latin America site.
Mr. Bevilaqua, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer: The Committee recognized Mr. Bevilaqua’s leadership in driving record profits in the Versatic Acids and Specialty Epoxy business units, his efforts in developing a very strong group of business unit leaders and his delivery of the Norco site closure, a major project that was extremely complex and executed in a very effective manner.
Mr. Johns, our Executive Vice President and General Counsel: The Committee recognized Mr. Johns for his significant contributions to the Company’s longer term business strategy, his leadership in the assessment of potential business transactions and his development of talent within the legal function.
Mr. Fisher, our Executive Vice President, Global Procurement: The Committee considered Mr. Fisher’s significant cost-productivity contributions in 2016 as well as his strong leadership in managing key supplier relationships for both the Company and MPM in a very challenging business environment.
Mr. Morrison, our former President and Chief Executive Officer: The Committee recognized Mr. Morrison’s significant contributions over his many years of service in determining the benefits provided to Mr. Morrison under his retirement agreement.
Mr. McGuire, our former Executive Vice President, Business Process and Information Technology: The Committee recognized the strong leadership and significant contributions that Mr. McGuire made to achieving cost synergies and guiding the shared services agreement process with MPM.
Mr. Rogerson was hired as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in July 2017. Mr Rogerson’s 2017 compensation was determined based on employment negotiations.
Components of Our Executive Compensation Program
The principal components of our executive compensation program are as follows:
TypeComponents
Annual Cash CompensationBase Salary
Annual Incentive Awards
Discretionary Awards
Long-Term IncentivesEquity Awards
Long-Term Cash Awards
BenefitsHealth, Welfare and Retirement Benefits
OtherInternational Assignment Compensation
Change-in-Control and Severance Benefits

shown in the table below. The following section describes each of these components in further detail.
TypeComponents
Annual Cash CompensationBase Salary
Annual Cash Incentive Awards
Discretionary Awards
Long-Term IncentivesEquity Awards
Long-Term Cash Awards
BenefitsHealth and Welfare Benefits
Retirement Benefits
OtherInternational Assignment Compensation
Change-in-Control and Severance Benefits
Hexion Inc. | 132 | 2020 Form 10-K

1.Annual Cash Compensation
Base Salaries
The annual base salaries of our NEOs are designed to be commensurate with professional status, accomplishments,the position’s overall responsibility, complexity and difficulty, and scope and impact within the organization, as well as the executive’s performance in the role and ability to assume increasing levels of responsibility overall impact on the organization, and the size and complexity of the business or functional operations managed.within Hexion. The annual base salaries of our NEOs are also intended to be internally equitable andexternally competitive with the market.
The Committee reviews our NEOs' base salary levels (i) annually, in conjunction with annual performance reviews, andor (ii) in conjunctionconnection with new hires, promotions or significant changes in job responsibilities. When approvingevaluating base salary increases, the Committee considers various factors, such as job performance, total target compensation, internal equity, impact on value-creation and the external competitive marketplace. The Committee reviews the performance and achievements of the NEOs in determining whether any increases are merited based on the prior year’s performance.
The base salary change for each NEO is shown in the table below. No base salary increase was granted to Mr. Knight’s, Mr. Fisher’s and Mr. McGuire’s merit increases in July took into consideration the accomplishments outlined above, internal equity, and external competitiveRogerson based on market considerations. NoThe effective date of the salary increases were deliveredfor Messrs. Knight, Johns and Alness was June 29, 2020, and Ms. Frederix’s salary increase was effective July 1, 2020, both consistent with our past practice in delivering annual merit increases.
Name2019 Base Salary2020 Base Salary2020 Increase (Decrease)
Mr. Rogerson
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
$1,250,000$1,250,000— %
Mr. Knight
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
$524,579$540,3163.00 %
Mr. Johns
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
$530,660$543,9272.50 %
Ms. Frederix (1)
Senior Vice President and
General Manager, Coatings & Composites
$401,049$413,0803.00 %
Mr. Alness
Senior Vice President and
General Manager, Global Adhesives
$460,000$473,8003.00 %
(1)Ms. Frederix’s local currency salary was converted from Euros to Mr. Bevilaqua or Mr. JohnsUS Dollars based on unique circumstances such as the changing scopea 2020 average exchange rate of their respective roles and relevant market data. Mr. Morrison retired on July 9, 2017, and Mr. Rogerson was hired on July 10, 2017, so neither NEO was eligible for a merit increase.
Name 2017 Base Salary 2016 Base Salary 2017 Increase (Decrease)
Mr. Rogerson $1,000,000
 n/a
 n/a
Mr. Knight 486,875
 475,000
 2.50%
Mr. Bevilaqua 631,108
 631,108
 %
Mr. Johns 517,212
 517,212
 %
Mr. Fisher 408,231
 392,529
 4.00%
Mr. Morrison 850,000
 850,000
 %
Mr. McGuire 385,053
 373,837
 3.00%
1.1389 Euros per US Dollar.
Annual Incentive Awards
Our annual incentive compensation plan (“ICP”) is a short-term performance incentiveperformance-based plan designed to reward participants for delivering increased value to the organization againstrelative to specific financial and other critical business objectives.objectives that have been approved by the Committee at the beginning of each performance year . Annual incentive compensation awards are targeted at a level that, when combined with base salaries and other components of our total rewards program, is intended to yield total annual cash compensation that is competitive in the external marketplace, while awards for performance abovethat exceeds the target isestablished targets are intended to yieldresult in total annual cash compensation above the market median.
The performance targets forunder the applicable components of the annual incentive compensation planICP are identical for our top executives and other ICP eligible, salaried associates. We strive to set annual incentive award targetsmeasures and goals that are achievable only through strong performance, believing that this motivates our executives and other participants to deliver ongoing value-creation, while allowing the Company to attract and retain highly talented senior executives. Annual incentive award targetsICP measures and goals are determined in connection with the development of an overall budget for Hexion Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries. Performance measuresgoals may be based on a number of factors, such as our prior-year performance, current market trends, anticipated synergies, integration efforts around acquired assets or businesses, potential pricing actions, raw material projections, the realization of planned productivity initiatives, expansion plans, new product development, environmental, health and safety, and other financial and/or strategic factors that could potentially impact operations.
The 20172020 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan
In early 2017,2020, the Committee approved the 2017 annual incentive compensation plan2020 ICP for associates of the Company and its subsidiaries, which we refer to as the “2017“2020 ICP.” Under the 20172020 ICP, our NEOs and other eligible participants had the opportunity to earn annual cash incentive compensation based upon the achievement of certain financial and Environmental Healthenvironmental health & Safetysafety (“EH&S”) goals. The design
Hexion Inc. | 133 | 2020 Form 10-K

Table of the 2017 ICP, described below, was substantially similar to the design of the 2016 incentive compensation plan.Contents
The performance goals under the 2017 ICP for our NEOs were based upon the achievement of both corporate and divisional goals to recognize their significant leadership responsibilities. Our NEOs with corporate functional roles: Messrs. Rogerson, Knight, Bevilaqua, Johns and Morrison, had 72.5% of their target bonus opportunity based on the achievement of corporate financial and EH&S targets and 27.5% based on the achievement of divisional financial targets.

As mentioned above, during 2016 and 2017, Messrs. Fisher and McGuire continued to provide services to MPM under the Shared Services Agreement. The 2017 ICP included a specific incentive structure for associates providing shared services. Under the shared services incentive design, Mr. Fisher’s and Mr. McGuire’s respective target bonus opportunities based 50% on the achievement of Hexion targets and 50% based on the achievement of MPM’s targets under MPM’s 2017 incentive compensation plan.
The Hexion performance goals were established based on the following measures:
Segment EBITDA (Hexion and divisional), which equals earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted to exclude certain non-cash and other income and expenses and discontinued operations. See Items 7 & 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of Hexion Net Loss to Segment EBITDA. For the 2017 ICP, the targeted Hexion Segment EBITDA was set at $428 million.
Cash flow, which encompasses Segment EBITDA, net trading capital improvement and/or usage, capital spending and interest paid along with other operating cash flow items such as income taxes paid and pension contributions. For the 2017 ICP, the targeted cash flow for Hexion Holdings was a net usage of cash of $105 million.

Environmental health & safety (EH&S) goals, which, for the 2017 ICP, included the following: (i) corrective actions completed on time, (ii) severe or high-potential incidents (“SIFs”), (iii) occupational illness and injury rate (“OIIR”), and (iv) total environmental incidents (ERI).

MeasureThe target goal for the timely closure of corrective actions on SIFs and process safety management (PSM) incidents was to close 90% of corrective actions on time.
Description2020 ICP Target
Segment EBITDAThe target SIFs goal was
Equals earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted to reduce the numberexclude discontinued operations, certain non-cash and other unusual income and expense items.

See Items 7 & 8 of SIFs by 12.5% comparedPart II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of Hexion Net Income to 2016.
Segment EBITDA.
Hexion Segment EBITDA (1)
($415.0 million)

Coatings & Composites Segment EBITDA ($164.4 million)

Global Resins Segment EBITDA
($211.1 million)
Cash Flow from OperationsThe Company’s OIIR in 2016 was 0.58. The target goal for 2017 wasEncompasses Segment EBITDA, net trading capital improvement and/or usage, capital spending and interest paid along with other operating cash flow items such as income taxes paid and pension contributions. Cash flow from operations excludes restructuring, unusual financing transactions, Business Services implementation costs and any proceeds/costs relative to achieve a 10% reduction from 2016 or a rateacquisitions and divestitures.Hexion Global Cash Flow
(Net cash generation
of 0.52.
$100 million)
SIFsHexion Holdings ended 2016 with 34 totalSevere or high-potential incidents.Three (3) incidents
OIIROccupational illness and injury rate.
0.53
Which would represent top quartile performance among medium-sized companies in the American Chemistry Council.
ERITotal environmental incidents. The 2017 goal was to reduce ERI to 30incidents
15 incidents
A reduction of five (5) incidents or fewer incidents, which represents an approximate 10%25% improvement from the prior year.
(1)Reflects EBITDA reported for the overall company (globally), including Corporate costs that are not allocated to the segments.
Each of the 20172020 performance goals was measured independently such that a payout for the achievement of one element was not dependent upon the achievement of any other performance measure. This was intended to keep associates focused on driving continuous improvement in EH&S and cash flow, in addition to EBITDA.
Awards under the 20172020 ICP were calculated as follows: each participant was designated a target award under the 20172020 ICP based on a percentage of his or her base salary, which varies by participant based on the scope of the participant’s responsibilities and externally competitive benchmarks. The target bonus percentages for the NEOs are reflected in the chart below.
hsc-20201231_g19.jpg
Note:For 2017,the EBITDA and Cash Flow goals, no payout is earned at the minimum level of achievement. NEOs begin to earn a payout only when      achievement exceeds the minimum. See table below for payout percentages for EH&S goals.
Hexion Inc. | 134 | 2020 Form 10-K

In 2020, for the EBITDA and Cash Flow goals, the Committee established a minimum level of performance at or below which there is no payout for that component. Above the minimum level of performance, each NEO earns a payout calculated on a linear path up to and including the target bonus percentage for our continuing NEOs aslevel of performance (100% payout). Above the target level of performance, each NEO earns a percentagepayout calculated on a linear path up to and including the maximum level of base salary remained consistent with the prior year. Fixedperformance (200% payout). The Committee established fixed payout percentages for our NEOs werefor the EH&S goals. The Committee established for minimum (50%(30% payout), target (100% payout), upper-mid (133% payout) and maximum (200% payout) levels of performance. Payout of theperformance for OIIR and ERI. Only target award is based on the achievement of the performance goals described above. Payout percentages between the minimum(100% payout) and target, the target and upper-mid and the upper mid and maximum (200% payout) levels of performance follow,were established for SIFs.
MinimumTargetMaximum
Hexion Segment EBITDA (1)
$375.0$415.0$450.0
Coatings & Composites Segment EBITDA (1)
$148.6$164.4$178.3
Global Resins Segment EBITDA (1)
$190.7$211.1$228.9
Hexion Global Cash Flow (1)
$60$100$140
Payout percentages applicable to achievement of EBITDA and Cash Flow goals100%200%
EH&S Goal - SIFs (2)
NA31
EH&S Goal - OIIR0.650.530.35
EH&S Goal - ERI181512
Payout percentages applicable to achievement of EH&S goals30%100%200%
(1)Amounts reflected are in each case, a linear path. Depending upon whether an NEO’s bonus opportunity is based on the achievementmillions.
(2)Reflects number of corporate or divisional goals, (i) achievement of Segment EBITDA ranging from approximately 92% of target to 98% of target would be necessary in order for a participant to earn the minimum 50% of the allocated target award for the EBITDA component, and (ii) achievement of Segment EBITDA ranging from approximately 114% of target to 137% of target would be necessary in order for a participant to earn the maximum 200% of the allocated target award for the Segment EBITDA goal.
In 2017, the achievement percentages required for the maximum EBITDA payout were increased to provide an incentive to further drive EBITDA growth. For example, in 2016, the Segment EBITDA needed to earn a maximum 200% payout was 107 - 112% of target, whereas under the 2017 ICP, achievement of approximately 114%-137% of target is required to earn the same payout. The Committee determined to adjust the achievement thresholds rather than the payout targets in order to keep the payout targets relatively consistent from year to year.
After several consecutive years of lower environmental incidents across the organization, the Company decided to focus the 2016 EH&S performance goals on only three (3) safety components. However, in 2017, in order to keep a focus on environmental responsibility, the Company re-introduced total environmental incidents as one of four (4) EH&S goals. The payment range for achieving the performance goals for EH&S was 100% (target) and 200% (maximum) of the allocated target award for each of the four EH&S goals. The payment range for achieving the performance goals for Cash Flow was 50% (minimum), 100% (target) and 200% (maximum) of the allocated target award for the Cash Flow component.

incidents.
The following table summarizes the target awards, performance measures, weightings, achievements and payouts for the 20172020 ICP awards granted to our NEOs. The 20172020 ICP award amounts are reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Each NEO’s actual bonus under the 20172020 ICP is calculated based on the information provided in the table below. In each case, the “Target Award” amount for each NEO is multiplied by the weighting percentage and performance achieved percentage for each individual component to determine the payout for that component. The total bonus payout is the sum of the individual component payouts.
Hexion Inc. | 135 | 2020 Form 10-K

Name  Incentive Target (% of Base Salary)  Target Award ($)  Performance Criteria / Weighting %  Performance Achieved (%) 2017 ICP Payout ($)
C. Rogerson 100% 
500,000(1)
 Hexion Segment EBITDA / 27.5% 0% 
      Divisional Segment EBITDA / 27.5% 35.7% 49,090
      EH&S Goal / 10% 125% 62,500
      Hexion Cash Flow / 35% 0% 
G. Knight  70% 340,813  Hexion Segment EBITDA / 27.5%  0% 
      Divisional Segment EBITDA / 27.5% 35.7% 33,461
      EH&S Goal / 10% 125% 42,602
      Hexion Cash Flow / 35% 0% 
J. Bevilaqua  80% 504,887  Hexion Segment EBITDA / 27.5%  0% 
      Divisional Segment EBITDA / 27.5% 35.7% 49,570
      EH&S Goal / 10% 125% 63,111
      
Hexion Cash Flow / 35%

 0% 
D. Johns  70% 362,049  Hexion Segment EBITDA / 27.5%  0% 
      Divisional Segment EBITDA / 27.5% 35.7% 35,546
      EH&S Goal / 10% 125% 45,256
      Hexion Cash Flow / 35% 0% 
N. Fisher 70% 285,761 Hexion Segment EBITDA / 13.75% 0% 
      Divisional Segment EBITDA / 13.75% 35.7% 14,028
      Hexion EH&S Goal / 5% 125% 17,860
      
Hexion Cash Flow / 17.5%

 0% 
      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 35% 143% 143,024
      Momentive EH&S Goal / 5% 150% 21,432
      Momentive Cash Flow / 10% 0% 
C. Morrison 100% 850,000 Hexion Segment EBITDA / 27.5% 0% 
      Divisional Segment EBITDA / 27.5% 35.7% 83,453
      EH&S Goal / 10% 125% 106,250
      Hexion Cash Flow / 35% 0% 
K. McGuire 60% 
133,999(1)
 Hexion Segment EBITDA / 13.75% 0% 
      Divisional Segment EBITDA / 13.75% 35.7% 6,616
      Hexion EH&S Goal / 5% 125% 8,423
      
Hexion Cash Flow / 17.5%

 0% 
      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 35% 143% 67,451
      Momentive EH&S Goal / 5% 150% 10,108
      Momentive Cash Flow / 10% 0% 

(1)The target awards for Messrs. Rogerson and McGuire have been prorated 50% and 58%, respectively based on their employment with the company in 2017.    
NameIncentive Target (% of Base Salary)
Target Award ($)(1)
Performance Criteria / Weighting %Performance Achieved (%)2020 ICP Payout ($)
Mr. Rogerson125%1,562,500Hexion Global EBITDA - Corp / 65%0%
Hexion SIF / 5%200%126,099
Hexion OIIR / 2.5%144%45,536
Hexion ERI / 2.5%200%63,050
Hexion Cash Flow / 25%58%181,268
Mr. Knight70%378,221Hexion Global EBITDA / 65%0%
Hexion SIF / 5%200%37,822
Hexion OIIR / 2.5%144%13,658
Hexion ERI / 2.5%200%18,911
Hexion Cash Flow / 25%58%54,369
Mr. Johns70%380,749Hexion Global EBITDA - Corp / 65%0%
Hexion SIF / 5%200%38,075
Hexion OIIR / 2.5%144%13,749
Hexion ERI / 2.5%200%19,037
Hexion Cash Flow / 25%58%54,733
Ms. Frederix60%247,848Hexion Global EBITDA - BU / 32.5%0%
Hexion Coatings & Composites EBITDA - BU / 32.5%10%8,136
Hexion SIF / 5%200%24,785
Hexion OIIR / 2.5%144%8,950
Hexion ERI / 2.5%200%12,392
Hexion Cash Flow / 25%58%35,628
Mr. Alness60%284,280Hexion Global EBITDA - BU / 32.5%0%
Hexion Global Resins EBITDA - BU / 32.5%0%
Hexion SIF / 5%200%28,428
Hexion OIIR / 2.5%144%10,266
Hexion ERI / 2.5%200%14,214
Hexion Cash Flow / 25%58%40,865
(1)Ms. Frederix’s ICP target award and payout was converted from Euros to US Dollars based on a 2020 average exchange rate of 1.1389 Euros per US Dollar.
Discretionary Awards
The CEO periodically uses discretionary awards to reward exemplary efforts. Often, such efforts are required by atypical business conditions or are related to special projects impacting long-term business results. Discretionary awards are also used for retention purposes or in connection with a new hiring or promotion. Any discretionary award to an executive officer must be approved by the Committee. NoIn 2020, Mr. Rogerson recommended, and the Committee approved, a discretionary awards wereaward for Mr. Knight to reward him for the significant additional contributions he made during the period Mr. Knight served as both CFO and interim CEO of the Company while Mr. Rogerson was out on a medical leave. In addition, the Committee approved a discretionary award for Mr. Rogerson which resulted in a total payout relative to target consistent with the other NEOs in corporate roles. Please see Footnote 1 to our NEOsSummary Compensation Table below for services performed in 2017.details of both awards.

2. Long-Term Incentive Awards
Equity Awards
The Committee believes that equity awards play an important role in creating incentives to maximize Company performance, motivating and rewarding long-term value-creation, and further aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders. Our NEOs, as well as other members of the leadership team and other eligible associates, participate in the equity plansplan sponsored by Hexion Holdings or Hexion LLC.Corporation. Awards under these plans are factored into the executive compensation program established by the Committee.

Our long-term strategy includes the use of periodic grants rather thanas well as ongoing annual grants of equity. We believe that periodic grants provide an incentive toward a projected long-term projected value.equity value and keep participants focused on the achievement of that long-term objective. Annual equity grants are a tool to both retain key associates and drive toward the achievement of longer-term business objectives. Our equity awards contain performance- and service-vesting requirements. Awards that are conditioned on service-vesting requirements only
Hexion Inc. | 136 | 2020 Form 10-K

function as a retention incentive, while awards that are conditioned on performance- and service-vesting requirements are linked to the attainment of specific long-term objectives.longer-term financial goals.
We have historically usedIn August 2019, the Board adopted the Hexion Holdings Corporation 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”). Under the 2019 Plan, annual grants were made in March 2020 to the NEOs, which included the following types of equity awards: (i) options to purchase commontime-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and (ii) restricted deferred units. Prior to the combination of the Company and MPM in 2010, our NEOs received awards under the following plans administered by Hexion LLC, Hexion or MPM: the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Stock Plan”), the 2004 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2004 DC Plan”), the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2007 Long-Term Plan”) and the Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Inc. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “MPM 2007 Plan”). At the time of the combination of the Company and MPM in 2010, all outstanding equity awards that included commonperformance-based stock units of Hexion LLC and shares of MPM Holdings were converted to units of Hexion Holdings. In February 2011, the Hexion Holdings Committee approved and granted awards under a new long-term equity incentive plan for key leaders and directors of the Company and MPM (the “2011 Equity Plan”(“PSUs”). These equity plansawards were granted to our NEOs and other selected management team executives who are describedcritical to delivering on the current and future performance goals of Hexion Holdings Corporation. These awards were granted to management in order to retain these executives and align their interests to those of our shareholders.
The stock units granted are non-voting units of measurement which are deemed for bookkeeping purposes to be equivalent to one share of common stock of Hexion Holdings Corporation. Of the “Narrative to Outstanding Equity Awards Table” below.
In February 2017, in recognition of his servicestock units granted to the Company,NEOs in March 2020, forty percent (40%) are RSUs and the Committee acted to extendremaining sixty percent (60%) are PSUs. The RSUs vest in equal installments on the expiration datefirst three anniversaries of the Tranche A options granted undergrant date.
The PSUs are divided into two equal tranches. The first tranche (50% of the 2007 MPM Plan held by Mr. Johns, which would have expiredPSUs granted) is earned based on March 30, 2017, toachievement of adjusted return on invested capital (“Adjusted ROIC”) for the trailing 12 month period ending December 31, 2020. These awards2022. The second tranche (50% of the PSUs granted) is earned based on achievement of EBITDA margin (“EBITDA Margin”) for the trailing 12-month period ending December 31, 2022. Any PSUs earned based on the performance criteria become vested when settled in July 2023. The performance targets and percentage of PSUs eligible to be earned are reflected in the “Outstanding Equity Awards Table - 2016 Fiscal Year-End”tables below.
In addition, due
Adjusted ROICPercentage of Adjusted ROIC PSUs earnedEBITDA MarginPercentage of EBITDA Margin PSUs Earned
13.0%50.0%13.0%50.0%
14.0%100.0%15.0%100.0%
15.0%150.0%17.0%150.0%

If the executive resigns without good reason prior to the passingsettlement date:

Vested RSUs are retained and any unvested RSUs are cancelled as of Mr. McGuire,the resignation date.

Earned and consistentunearned PSUs are cancelled as of the resignation date.
If the executive is terminated by the Company without cause, or the executive resigns for good reason prior to the settlement date:

Vested RSUs are retained. The tranche of the RSUs that would vest on the immediately succeeding vesting date following the termination date of the executive accelerate and become immediately vested upon the executive’s termination date.Unvested RSUs as of the termination date are cancelled on the termination date.

A pro-rata number of the PSUs remain eligible to be earned based on the number of days the executive is employed by the Company during the January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 period. The remaining PSUs are cancelled on the termination date.

If the executive dies or becomes disabled prior to the settlement date:

The RSUs vest in full and all vested RSUs are settled as soon as administratively feasible, but in no event later than 30 days following such date of termination.
Earned PSUs immediately vest and are settled as soon as administratively feasible, but in no event later than 30 days following the executive’s termination date. Unearned PSUs are cancelled upon the executive’s termination date.

Upon the executive’s retirement following attainment of age 60 with plan provisions,at least five years of service with the Company, and upon the executive providing the Company with four (4) months advance notice of the executive’s retirement date:

Any unvested RSUs continue to vest in full.
A pro-rata number of the PSUs remain eligible to be earned based on the number of days the executive is employed by the Company during the January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 period. The remaining PSUs are cancelled on the executive’s retirement date.

Unless otherwise noted above, vested RSUs and earned PSUs are subject to settlement in July 2023.


Hexion Inc. | 137 | 2020 Form 10-K

If a change-in-control transaction takes place during the RSU vesting period, all unvested RSUs will automatically vest and be settled in cash as soon as administratively feasible, but in no event later than 14 days following such change in control. If a change in control takes place prior to December 31, 2022, a pro-rata number of PSUs shall be deemed earned based on the deferred compensation units previously granted undernumber of days that elapsed from January 1, 2020 through the 2004 Deferred Compensation Plan and issued payment to Mr. McGuire’s surviving spouse. Also, consistent with applicable provisionsdate of the 2011 Equity Plan,change in control. Such earned PSUs vest immediately upon such change in control and will be settled in cash as soon as administratively feasible, but in no event later than 14 days following such change in control.
Unless otherwise noted above, (i) vested RSUs are subject to settlement and delivery of the Company repurchased fromunderlying shares of common stock in July 2023; and (ii) earned PSUs are subject to settlement and delivery of the underlying shares of common stock in July 2023 unless, prior to the settlement date, the executive resigns his surviving spouse common units previously issuedor her employment. Termination of employment for cause will result in the executive forfeiting earned, vested or unvested awards upon the termination date.
The details of the grants made to Mr. McGuire.our NEOs are shown in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below.
Cash Awards
The Committee may, from time to time, approve long-term cash awards or plans for our key associates, including our NEOs. These awards are designed to pay over extended performance periods subject to the achievement of specified, measurable performance goals, and are further conditioned upon continued employment. As such, these awards are useful infor providing a defined value for achievement of our financial targets, as well as leadership stability. In addition, long-term cash awards help complement equity awards that are not yet liquid.
RetainingIn November 2016, in an effort to retain key talent during difficult business cycles has beenin a critical focus for the Company in recent years. It became apparent to the Committee that the long-term performance goals established under a 2012 plan would likely never be achieved due to the MPM bankruptcy. Therefore, to ensure the continued retention of key talent during a critical period of challenging business conditions, the Committee granted newenvironment, long-term cash awards to key leaders employed by the Company in November 2014,were granted under the Momentive Performance Materials Holdings LLC Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”). The LTIP awards are subject to service-vesting requirements. Acceptance of this award was conditioned upon the participant’s forfeiture of certain earlier awards.
In November 2016, new long-term cash awards were made under the LTIP to all of our NEOs. TheseNEOs other than the CEO. The LTIP awards vest based upon service and/or performance metrics, depending upon the grantee.
In July 2017, following the retirement announcement of Mr. Craig Morrison, our former CEO, a modification was made to the 2016 awards to ensure stability and retention of key associates; including the NEOs, except for Mr. Rogerson. A portion of these awards that were payable based on achievement of performance metrics were converted into time-based awards payable in 2020.
After2020 or 2021 as applicable. The LTIP was assumed by Hexion Holdings Corporation upon emergence from the sudden passing of Mr. McGuire, the Compensation Committee approved a promise to pay the service-vestingbalance sheet restructuring process on July 1, 2019. The amounts of his LTIP award to his spouse. The payment will occur at the same time as those service-based amounts would have otherwise been paid to Mr. McGuire. As a part of Mr. Morrison’s retirement arrangements with the Company, the Committee agreed to pay Mr. Morrison the service-vesting portion of his award at the time that Mr. Morrison was otherwise to received payment, in July 2018.2020 to Messrs. Knight, Johns, and Alness were $791,666, $862,021, and $352,296, respectively. Ms. Frederix will receive payment of the remaining tranche of her 2016 award in July 2021.
3.The above amounts are reported in the “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table below.
3.Benefits and Perquisites
Benefits
The Company provides a comprehensive groupsuite of benefits to eligible associates, including our NEOs. Our benefit programs are designed to provide market-competitive benefits for associates and their covered dependents. Each of our NEOs (other than Ms. Frederix) is covered under a health and welfare program that provides medical, prescription drug, dental, vision, life insurance and disability insurance benefits. Ms. Frederix is covered under the applicable health and welfare benefits program offered to associates in Belgium.
Each of our NEOs, other than Ms.Frederix, also participates in our savings plan, a defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which allows eligible U.S. associates to make pre-tax contributions from 1% to 15% of eligible earnings for associates who meet the definition of a highly compensated employee and 25% for all other associates up to the U.S. tax limits for qualified plans. Those associates are also eligible to receive matching contributions from the Company equal to 100% on contributions of up to 5% of eligible earnings. In addition, the Company makes an annual retirement contribution, ranging from 3% to 7% of eligible earnings depending on years of service, to eligible associates actively employed on the last day of the year. An additional company contribution may be made if we achieve specified annual financial goals established at the beginning of each plan year.

Ms. Frederix participates in a defined benefit pension plan offered to our Belgium associates, as further described in the Narrative to the Pension Benefits Table below.
Each of our NEOs, other than Messrs. Johns and Rogerson and Ms. Frederix, participated in a qualified cash balance pension plan on substantially the same terms as other plan participants (the “Hexion U.S. Pension Plan”). The Hexion U.S. Pension Plan was frozen in 2009, as discussed further in the Narrative to the Pension Benefits table below.  In addition, because individuals are subject to U.S. tax limitations on contributions to qualified retirement plans, the Company provided a non-qualified retirement plan intended to provide these associates,plan participants, including our NEOs, with an incremental benefit on eligible earnings above the U.S. tax limits for the qualified plan (the “Hexion Supplemental Plan”).  The benefits in the Hexion Supplemental Plan associated with the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan were also frozen in 2009.  Our NEOs participated in the non-qualified planHexion Supplemental Plan on the same basis as our other highly compensated salaried associates.
Additionally, because individuals are subject to U.S. tax limitations on contributions to a qualified retirement plan, and following the freezing of the Hexion Supplemental Plan, in 2011 the Company established a non-qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), in 2011, which provides a benefit on eligible earnings that exceed the U.S. tax limit applicable to our 401(k) Plan. In 2017,2020, our NEO’sNEOs, other than Ms. Frederix, were eligible to receive a 5% company contribution on eligible earnings in excess of $270,000,$285,000, which is the same benefit received by our other highly compensated salaried employees.associates.
There were no significant changes to the Company’s benefit plans in 20172020 that would impact our NEOs. There are descriptions of these plans in the Narrative to the Pension Benefits Table and Narrative to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table below.
4.Other
Hexion Inc. | 138 | 2020 Form 10-K

Temporary Assignment / Relocation
Table of Contents
The Company may provide certain additional benefits to an executive officer if he or she is on a temporary international or domestic assignment. These benefits are externally competitive and a means to compensate the executive officer for financial expenses that would not exist if the executive remained in his or her home. For example, the Company may provide family travel and housing allowances, other one-time allowances, tax equalization payments, and reimbursements or payments for relocation from the executive officer’s home. In addition, pursuant to the Company’s relocation policy, certain expenses are grossed up to protect the executive from the tax consequences associated with those certain relocation expenses. We believe that, as a global company, it is necessary to offer this compensationbenefit to encourage key associates and executives to temporarily relocate for strategic business reasons. None of our NEOs received additional benefits related temporary assignment or relocation in 2020.

Perquisites

A company-leased car is provided to Ms. Frederix and Mr. Alness in connection with their commercial responsibilities. Ms. Frederix pays a statutorily-determined tax based on the fiscal price of the car and a CO2 emission rate, consistent with market practice. The Company imputes income to Mr. Alness each year, and withholds appropriate taxes, based on the value of the car and the percentage of time Mr. Alness uses the company car for his personal benefit, also consistent with market practice.

Employment Agreements and Restrictive Covenants
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Rogerson effective July 1, 2019. Otherwise, we don’t have employment agreements with our NEOs other than in countries where it is common practice to employ an executive by contract.

Change-in-Control and Severance Benefits
Our NEOs are generally entitled to change-in-control and severance protections. We believe that appropriate change-in-control and severance protections accomplish two objectives. First, they create an environment where key executives are able to take actions in the best interest of the Company without incurring undue personal risk. Second, they foster management stability during periods of potential uncertainty. We are also cognizant that excessive pay in the form of change-in-control and severance protection would not be in the best interest of the Company because such pay may encourage undue risk-taking. In an attempt to balance the delicate equation, the Committee has determined to provide these benefits very selectively. The arrangements for our NEOs other than Mr. Rogerson were implemented in prior years. The arrangement for Mr. Rogerson was implemented in connection with the Emergence and was an important tool to ensure his continued service during this critical time for the Company. The change-in-control and severance benefits payable to our NEOs are discussed in the Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table and in the discussion on Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment below.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION(1)
The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the disclosures contained in the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based upon this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Compensation Committee of the Board of Managers
Robert Kalsow-RamosJeffrey D. Benjamin (Chairman)
Scott M. KleinmanJames N. Chapman
Samuel FeinsteinStephen D. Newlin
John K. Wulff



(1)SEC filings sometimes “incorporate information by reference.” This means the Company is referring the reader to information that has previously been filed with the SEC, and that this information should be considered as part of the filing. Unless the Company specifically states otherwise, this report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference and shall not constitute soliciting material or otherwise be considered filed under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
(1)SEC filings sometimes “incorporate information by reference.” This means the Company is referring the reader to information that has previously been filed with the SEC, and that this information should be considered as part of the filing. Unless the Company specifically states otherwise, this report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference and shall not constitute soliciting material or otherwise be considered filed under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.


Hexion Inc. | 139 | 2020 Form 10-K

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table provides information about the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and our three next most highly compensated executive officers and one former executive officer at December 31, 2017, whom we collectively refer to as our NEOs.
Name and
Principal Position(a)
Year
(b)
Salary
($)
(c)
Bonus
($)
(d) (1)
Stock
Awards
($)
(e)
Options
Awards
($)
(f)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
(g) (2)
Change in Pension Value
and Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings ($)(h) (3)

All Other Compensation
($)
(i) (4)
Total
($)
(j)
Craig A. Rogerson President and Chief Executive Officer20201,250,000 99,445 5,925,000 — 415,953 2,235 115,041 7,807,674 
20191,125,000 — 23,814,996 — 1,068,178 330 202,013 26,210,517 
20181,000,000 — — — 916,000 — 374,556 2,290,556 
George F. Knight Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2020532,447 1,041,666 1,022,228 — 124,760 16,476 69,229 2,806,806 
2019515,464 250,113 1,602,096 — 306,139 49,028 67,772 2,790,612 
2018496,612 475,000 — — 324,672 — 53,412 1,349,696 
Douglas A. Johns
Executive Vice
President and
General Counsel
2020537,293 862,021 894,343 — 125,594 1,414 66,598 2,487,263 
2019523,936 208,428 1,255,704 — 309,688 430 64,306 2,362,492 
2018517,213 517,213 — — 331,637 — 50,548 1,416,611 
Ann Frederix
Senior Vice President and General Manager Global Epoxies
2020407,065 — 520,436 — 89,891 1,049,294 13,667 2,080,353 
2019375,986 290,626 974,250 — 105,232 793,347 — 2,539,441 
Mark I. Alness
Senior Vice President
Global Resins
2020466,900 352,296 605,661 — 93,773 13,770 61,315 1,593,715 
(1)The amounts shown in column (d) for 2020 reflect time-based amounts paid under the LTIP and for Messrs. Rogerson and Knight, also includes a discretionary bonuses of $99,445 and $250,000, respectively, as described in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis above. 
(2)The amounts shown in column (g) for 2020 reflect the amounts earned under the 2020 ICP, based on performance achieved for 2020. The material terms of the 2020 ICP are described in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis above. Payments under the 2020 ICP were made in March 2021.
(3)The amounts shown in column (h) reflect the net actuarial increase in the present value of benefits under the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan and the Hexion Supplemental Plan for Messrs Knight and Alness. The increase in net present value for 2020 includes: for Mr. Knight, a $11,211 increase; and for Mr. Alness, a $9,142 increase in net present value. Mr. Rogerson, Ms. Frederix, and Mr. Johns are not participants in these plans. In addition, the amounts reported include excess interest credits in the Hexion non-qualified deferred compensation plans for Messrs. Rogerson, Knight, Johns and Alness. The amount reported for Ms. Frederix is the net present value increase in 2020 to her accrued benefit in the Hexion Belgium Pension Plan. See the Pension Benefits Table below, including the Narrative to Pension Benefits Table, for additional information regarding our pension calculations, including the assumptions used for these calculations.
(4)The amounts shown in the All Other Compensation column for 2020 include: for Mr. Rogerson: $115,041 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans,, for Mr. Knight: $69,229 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans; for Mr. Johns: $66,598 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans; for Mr. Alness: $61,315 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans, as well as the cost associated with personal use of his company car; and for Ms.Frederix $13,667, reflecting the cost associated with personal use of her company car.
Hexion Inc. | 140 | 2020 Form 10-K

Name and
Principal Position(a)
 
Year
(b)
 
Salary
($)
(c)
 
Bonus
($)
(d) (1)
 
Stock
Awards
($)
(e)
 
Options
Awards
($)
(f)
 
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
(g) (2)
 
Change in Pension Value
and Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings ($)
(h) (3)
 

All Other Compensation
($)
(i) (4)
 
Total
($)
(j)
Craig A. Rogerson President and Chief Executive Officer 2017 480,769
 888,410
 
 
 111,590
 
 258,302
 1,739,071
 2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                   
George F. Knight Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2017 480,937
 272,267
 
 
 76,063
 
 54,778
 884,045
 2016 475,000
 272,267
 
 
 81,562
 10,839
 50,142
 889,810
 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                   
Joseph P. Bevilaqua
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
 2017 631,108
 743,600
 
 
 112,681
 
 77,118
 1,564,507
 2016 631,108
 743,600
 
 
 182,883
 9,856
 109,745
 1,677,192
 2015 624,557
 858,000
 
 
 794,969
 
 134,260
 2,411,786
                   
Douglas A. Johns
Executive Vice
President and
General Counsel
 2017 517,213
 594,880
 
 
 80,802
 
 48,768
 1,241,663
 2016 517,212
 594,880
 
 
 88,811
 
 75,331
 1,276,234
 2015 509,485
 686,400
 
 
 425,475
 
 36,358
 1,657,718
                   
Nathan E. Fisher
Executive Vice President, Global Procurement
 2017 400,380
 596,232
 
 
 196,344
 
 43,564
 1,236,520
 2016 383,183
 596,232
 
 
 199,876
 5,769
 40,006
 1,225,066
 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                   
Craig O. Morrison
President and Chief Executive Officer
 2017 441,346
 1,653,750
 
 
 189,703
 
 89,559
 2,374,358
 2016 850,000
 3,803,750
 
 
 208,505
 18,847
 139,874
 5,020,976
 2015 976,606
 4,775,000
 
 
 998,909
 4,142
 91,967
 6,846,624
                   
Kevin W. McGuire Executive Vice President Business Process & IT 2017 216,538
 1,242,600
 
 
 92,597
 
 79,145
 1,630,880
 2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)The amounts shown in column (d) for 2017 reflect amounts paid under the LTIP to each NEO with the exception of Mr. Rogerson, whose amount in column (d) reflects the difference between the amount earned in Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (column g) and the guaranteed bonus amount as described in his employment agreement ($1,000,000).
(2)The amounts shown in column (g) for 2017 reflect the amounts earned under the 2017 ICP, based on performance achieved for 2017. The material terms of the 2017 ICP are described in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis above. Payments under the 2017 ICP will be made in April 2018.
(3)The amounts shown in column (h) reflect the net actuarial decrease in the present value of benefits under the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan and the Hexion Supplemental Plan for Messrs. Knight, Bevilaqua, Fisher, Morrison, and McGuire. Mr. Rogerson and Mr. Johns are not participants in these plans. The decrease in net present value for 2017 includes: for Mr. Knight, a ($1,156) decrease; for Mr. Bevilaqua, a ($3,285) decrease; for Mr. Fisher, a ($757) decrease; for Mr. Morrison, a ($58,368) decrease; and for Mr. McGuire, a ($3,711) decrease in net present value. See the Pension Benefits Table below for additional information regarding our pension calculations, including the assumptions used for these calculations.
(4)The amounts shown in the All Other Compensation column for 2017 include: for Mr. Rogerson: $32,138 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans, $112,805 in tax gross-ups, $17,009 in rental housing and furniture, and $96,056 in travel expenses; for Mr. Knight: $54,778 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans; for Mr. Bevilaqua: $77,118 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans; for Mr. Johns: $48,768 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans; for Mr. Fisher: $43,564 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans; for Mr. Morrison: $89,559 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans; and for Mr. McGuire: $31,878 of company contributions made or accrued to the defined contribution plans, $1,111 in tax gross-ups and $46,156 payable to his surviving spouse for one month’s salary plus any earned vacation time at time of death.


GRANTSGRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table presents information about grants of plan-based awards during the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, including the annual incentive compensation plan (2020 ICP) and annual equity awards granted under the 2017 ICP2019 MIP.
Name (a)Estimated Future Payouts Under 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
(h) (2)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
(i)
Exercise or
Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/share)
(j)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
($)(k)(3)
Threshold
($)
(b)
Target
($)
(c)
Maximum
($)
(d)
Threshold
(#)
(e)
Target
(#)
(f)
Maximum
(#)
(g)
Craig A. Rogerson
2020 ICP3,906 1,562,500 3,125,000 — — — — — — — 
2020 Equity Grant
RSUs— — — — — — 150,000 — — 2,370,000 
PSUs— — — 112,500 225,000 337,500 — — — 3,555,000 
George F. Knight
2020 ICP946 378,221 756,442 — — — — — — — 
2020 Equity Grant
RSUs— — — — — — 25,879 — — 408,888 
PSUs— — — 19,410 38,819 58,229 — — — 613,340 
Douglas A. Johns
2020 ICP620 380,749761,497— — — — — — — 
2020 Equity Grant
RSUs— — — — — — 22,642 — — 357,744
PSUs— — — 16,981 33,962 50,943 — — — 536,600
Ann Frederix
2020 ICP952 247,848 435,229 — — — — — — — 
2020 Equity Grant
RSUs— — — — — — 13,176 — — 208,181 
PSUs— — — 9,837 19,673 29,510 — — — 312,255 
Mark I. Alness
2020 ICP711 284,280 568,560 — — — — — — — 
2020 Equity Grant
RSUs— — — — — — 15,333 — — 242,261 
PSUs— — — 11,500 23,000 34,500 — — — 363,400 
(1)        The number reported reflects the number of performance-based stock units that could be earned based on achievement of the performance criteria at minimum, target and maximum. The aggregate Target Award was converted into a performance-based award (60%) based on a Hexion Holdings Corporation stock price of $15.00 per share.
(2)        The number reported reflects the number of time-based restricted stock units granted. The aggregate Target Award value was converted into a time-based award (40%) based on a Hexion Holdings Corporation stock price of $15.00 per share.
(3)        The values shown are based on a fair value of $15.80 per share for the time-based restricted stock units and the 2016 LTIP grants that are subject to performance-vesting conditions.performance based stock units at Target.

Hexion Inc. | 141 | 2020 Form 10-K

Name (a) 
Estimated Future Payouts Under 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Threshold
($)
(c)
 
Target
($)
(d)
 
Maximum
($)
(e)
Craig A. Rogerson(1)
      
2017 ICP 12,500
 500,000
 1,000,000
George F. Knight      
2017 ICP 8,520
 340,813
 681,625
2016 LTIP 1,266,666
 1,900,000
 1,900,000
Joseph P. Bevilaqua      
2017 ICP 12,622
 504,887
 1,009,773
Douglas A. Johns      
2017 ICP 9,051
 362,049
 724,097
2016 LTIP 1,379,234
 2,068,850
 2,068,850
Nathan E. Fisher      
2017 ICP 3,572
 285,761
 571,523
2016 LTIP 1,046,744
 1,570,117
 1,570,117
Craig O. Morrison      
2017 ICP 21,250
 850,000
 1,700,000
Kevin W. McGuire      
2017 ICP 2,888
 231,032
 462,063
2016 LTIP 996,900
 996,900
 996,900
Table of Contents
(1)The amounts reflected above for Mr. Rogerson are the amounts he was eligible to earn under the 2017 ICP. Mr. Rogerson’s employment arrangements with the Company provide for a minimum bonus payment for 2017 equal to $1,000,000.
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
Employment Agreements
The Company has employment agreements or employment letters with each of our NEOs, which provide for their terms of compensation, benefits, severance, and certain restrictive covenants. Details regarding the severance and restrictive covenant provisions are provided below under “Potential Payments upon a Termination or Change in Control.”
Mr. Rogerson’s Employment Agreement dated June 12, 2017,July 1, 2019, includes (i) a base salary at the rate of one million two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($1,000,000)1,250,000) per annum, (ii) an annual cash bonus with a target amount equal to 100%125% of his base salary, based on Mr. Rogerson’s and/or the Company’s attainment of certain criteria as determined by the Board, and (iii) a long-termcommitment that Mr. Rogerson will participate in the Company’s equity incentive award earned pursuant to theprogram upon terms and conditions established by the Board.
    Mr. Knight’s Terms of the LTI Award AgreementEmployment dated June 12, 2017,October 22, 2015 provides that he is entitled to (i) receive an annual base salary of $475,000 for his first year (“Base Salary”), (ii) be eligible to receive annual cash incentive compensation payments (the “Annual Bonus”) with a target Annual Bonus opportunity of 70% of his Base Salary; and (iv) reimbursement of certain commuting and relocation costs.
Mr. Rogerson’s 2017 LTI Award Agreement generally provides for a cash bonus(iii) be eligible to receive severance equal to 7.5%18 months of Base Salary in the amountevent of any distribution of cash or property made by Hexion Holdings to one or more of its members during the term of his employment agreement and on or prior to December 31, 2020. Unless Mr. Rogerson’s employment is terminated before December 31, 2020,a termination by the Company with cause orwithout cause. Mr. Knight will not receive additional compensation for by Mr. Rogerson without good reason, or due to his death or disability, Mr. Rogerson will be entitled toserving as a director of the Company.
Ms. Frederix’s Employment Agreement, as amended July 1, 2019, provides for (i) a base salary at the rate of three hundred fifty-two thousand one hundred and twenty-seven euros (EUR 352,127) per annum, (ii) an additionalannual cash bonus on each anniversary of the last day of the term of the employment agreement that occurs prior towith a change in control of the Company,target amount equal to 7.5%60% of her base salary, based on the aggregate amountachievement of any distributionscertain targets determined annually by the Board, and (iii) a commitment that Ms. Frederix will participate in the Company’s equity incentive program upon terms and conditions established by the Board.In addition, Ms. Frederix receives a company car benefit under the company car policy for Europe.
    Mr. Johns’ Employment Agreement dated May 6, 2015 includes (i) a base salary of $497,319.68 per year (“Base Salary”); (ii) annual cash or property made by Hexion Holdingsincentive compensation payments (“Annual Bonus”) with an annual target of 70% of his Base Salary; and (iii) eligibility to its members duringreceive severance equal to 18 months of Base Salary in the preceding year. Uponevent of a change in control of the Company, unless Mr. Rogerson’s employment is terminatedtermination by the Company with cause (or, following the term of the employment agreement, at a time when the Company would have had “cause” to terminate Mr. Rogerson had the employment agreement remained in effect) or by Mr. Rogerson without good reason, or due to his death or disability, Mr. Rogerson will be entitled to an amount equal to the sum of (x) 7.5% of any distributions made by Hexion Holdings to its members since the last of such cash bonuses, and (y) 7.5% of the net sale proceeds available for distribution to members of Hexion Holdings in connection with such change in control transaction.
Mr. Johns’ Terms of Employment from May 2015 include relocation benefits under the Company’s relocation policy, the extension of the equity awards held by Mr. Johns in Hexion Holdings and agreement that the put/call rights and obligations related to the common units of Hexion Holdings equity purchased by Mr. Johns continue so long as he remains an employee of the Company.cause. In addition, Mr. Johns received service credit for his prior years of service with MPM and GE for purposes of calculating his retirement benefits.

2017 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (2017 ICP)
InformationMr. Alness’s Terms of Employment dated July 1, 2019 provide for (i) a base salary at the rate of four hundred sixty thousand dollars ($460,000) per year, (ii) an annual cash bonus with a target amount equal to 60% of base salary, based on the 2017 ICPachievement of certain targets performance components, weightings,determined annually by the Board, and payouts for each(iii) health and welfare and retirement benefits on the same terms and conditions as other eligible associates. In addition, Mr. Alness receives a company car under the company car arrangements offered to eligible U.S. associates.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Each of our NEOs canreceived an annual equity grant on March 9, 2020. The grant was delivered in a mix of time-based restricted stock units (40% of total award value) and performance-based stock units (60% of total award value). The time-based restricted stock units vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date and will be foundsettled as soon as administratively feasible in July 2023. Fifty percent (50%) of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis sectionperformance-based stock units are earned based on achievement of this Report.
2016 Long-Term Cash Incentive Awards (2016 Awards)
In exchangeEBITDA margin for the award amounts originally granted in 2016,trailing twelve month period ending December 31, 2022. A minimum of 50% will be earned if EBITDA margin of 13% is achieved, and a maximum of 150% will be earned if EBITDA margin of 17% is achieved. The remaining 50% of the Board granted new awardsperformance-based stock units are earned based on achievement of adjusted return on invested capital (“Adjusted ROIC”) for the trailing twelve month period ending December 31, 2022. A minimum of 50% will be earned if Adjusted ROIC of 13% is achieved, and a maximum of 150% of the target shares will be earned if Adjusted ROIC of 15% is achieved. Any shares earned will vest and be settled as soon as administratively feasible in July 2017 for Messrs. Knight, Johns, Fisher and McGuire such that, for each2023.


Hexion Inc. | 142 | 2020 Form 10-K

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
The following table presents information about outstanding and unexercised options and outstanding stock awards held by our NEOs atas of December 31, 2017.2020. The securities underlying the awards are common unitsshares of Hexion Holdings, and the awards were granted under the 2004 Stock Plan, 2007 Long-Term Plan, the MPM 2007 Plan and the 2011 EquityHexion Holdings Corporation 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan. See the footnotes and Narrative to the Outstanding Equity Awards Table below, as well as the description of Equity Awards above, for a discussion of these plansthis plan and the vesting conditions applicable to the awards.
 
Stock Awards(1)
Name (a)
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)
(b) (2)
Market Value of Shares or Units or Stock That Have Not Vested
($)
(c) (3)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)
(d) (4)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)(e) (3)
Craig A. Rogerson
Restricted Stock Units700,000 8,575,000 
Performance Stock Units1,508,333 18,477,079 
George F. Knight
Restricted Stock Units62,879770,268 
Performance Stock Units— — 125,152 1,533,112 
Douglas A. Johns
Restricted Stock Units51,642 632,615 
Performance Stock Units— — 101,629 1,244,955 
Ann Frederix
Restricted Stock Units35,676 437,031 
Performance Stock Units— — 72,263 885,222 
Mark I. Alness
Restricted Stock Units40,333 494,079 
Performance Stock Units— — 81,333 996,329 
  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name (a) 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
(b)
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
(c)
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d)
 
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e)
 
Option
Expiration
Date
(f)
  
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)
(g)
 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
(h) (1)
Craig A. Rogerson 
 
 
 
 
  
 
George F. Knight               
2004 Stock Plan: 2
               
Tranche A Options 26,816
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017
  
 
Tranche B Options 26,816
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017
  
 
2011 Equity Plan:               
2011 Grant:               
Tranche A Options 3
 32,375
 
 
 4.85
 2/23/2021
  
 
Tranche B Options 4
 
 
 16,187
 4.85
 2/23/2021
  
 
Tranche C Options 5
 
 
 16,187
 4.85
 2/23/2021
  
 
Tranche B RDUs 4
 
 
 
 
 
  5,396
 2,104
Tranche C RDUs 5
 
 
 
 
 
  5,396
 2,104
2013 Grant:               
Unit Options 6
 35,044
 
 
 1.42
 3/8/2023
  
 
RDUs 7
 
 
 
 
 
  27,672
 10,792
Joseph P. Bevilaqua               
2004 Stock Plan: 2
               
Tranche A Options 100,504
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017
  
 
Tranche B Options 100,504
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017
  
 
2011 Equity Plan:               
2011 Grant:               
Tranche A Options 3
 183,517
 
 
 4.85
 2/23/2021
  
 
Tranche B Options 4
 
 
 91,758
 4.85
 2/23/2021
  
 
Tranche C Options 5
 
 
 91,758
 4.85
 2/23/2021
  
 
Tranche B RDUs 4
 
 
 
 
 
  30,586
 11,929
Tranche C RDUs 5
 
 
 
 
 
  30,586
 11,929
2013 Grant:               
Unit Options 6
 416,189
 
 
 1.42
 3/8/2023
  
 
RDUs 7
 
 
 
 
 
  328,635
 128,168
Douglas A. Johns               
(1)Reflects grants made on September 9, 2019 and March 9, 2020

(2)The award granted September 9, 2019 vests in three equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of July 1, 2019 however, is subject to forfeiture based on resignation prior to the settlement date. Settlement of vested awards that have not been forfeited will occur and will be settled within 10 days following July 1, 2022. The award granted March 9, 2020 vests in three equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date and will be settled as soon as administratively feasible in July 2023.
(3)The market values shown in Columns (h) and (j) are based on the closing price of a share of Hexion Holdings Corporation common stock on the over-the-counter market as of December 31, 2020.
(4)Twenty-five percent (25%) of the award granted September 9, 2019 vests when, at any time during the Vesting Period, a $20 .00 volume-weighted average price (VWAP) is attained. Thereafter, an additional 7.5% of the award will vest with each $1.00 increase in the VWAP during the Vesting Period, until 100% of the award is vested if a $30.00 VWAP is attained during the Vesting Period. Any portion of the award that vests prior to July 1, 2022 areis subject to settlement and delivery of the underlying shares of common stock in July 2022, and any portion of the award that vests on or after July 1, 2022, but before July 1, 2023, is subject to settlement and delivery of the underlying shares of common stock in July 2023. Fifty percent (50%) of the award granted March 9, 2020 is earned based on achievement of EBITDA margin for the trailing twelve month period ending December 31, 2022. A minimum of 50% of the target shares will be earned if EBITDA margin of 13% is achieved and a maximum of 150% of the target shares will be earned if EBITDA margin of 17% is achieved. The remaining 50% of the award granted on March 9, 2020 is earned based on achievement of adjusted return on invested capital (“Adjusted ROIC”) for the trailing twelve month period ending December 31, 2022. A minimum of 50% of the target shares will be earned if Adjusted ROIC of 13% is achieved and a maximum of 150% of the target shares will be earned if Adjusted ROIC of 15% is achieved. Any shares earned will vest and be settled as soon as administratively feasible in July 2023.
Hexion Inc. | 143 | 2020 Form 10-K
  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name (a) 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
(b)
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
(c)
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d)
 
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e)
 
Option
Expiration
Date
(f)
  
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)
(g)
 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
(h) (1)
2007 MPM Plan:               
Tranche A Options 8
 89,979
 
 
 2.59
 12/31/2020
  
 
2011 Equity Plan:               
2011 Grant:               
Tranche A Options 3
 60,480
 
 
 4.85
 2/23/2021
  
 
Tranche B Options 4
 
 
 30,240
 4.85
 2/23/2021
  
 
Tranche C Options 5
 
 
 30,240
 4.85
 2/23/2021  
 
Tranche B RDUs 4
 
 
 
 
 
  10,080
 3,931
Tranche C RDUs 5
 
 
 
 
 
  10,080
 3,931
2013 Grant:               
Unit Options 6
 262,861
 
 
 1.42
 3/8/2023  
 
RDUs 7
 
 
 
 
 
  207,563
 80,950
Nathan E. Fisher               
2004 Stock Plan: 2
               
Tranche A Options 46,929
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017  
 
Tranche B Options 46,929
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017
  
 
2011 Equity Plan:               
2011 Grant:               
Tranche A Options 3
 118,710
 
 
 4.85
 2/23/2021  
 
Tranche B Options 4
 
 
 59,356
 4.85
 2/23/2021  
 
Tranche C Options 5
 
 
 59,356
 4.85
 2/23/2021  
 
Tranche B RDUs 4
 
 
 
 
 
  19,785
 7,716
Tranche C RDUs 5
 
 
 
 
 
  19,785
 7,716
2013 Grant:              
Unit Options 6
 244,906
 
 
 1.42
 3/8/2023  
 
RDUs 7
 
 
 
 
 
  193,385
 75,420
Craig O. Morrison               
2004 Stock Plan: 2
               
Tranche A Options 301,514
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017  
 
Tranche B Options 301,514
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017  
 
2011 Equity Plan:               
2011 Grant:               
Tranche A Options 3
 290,501
 
 
 4.85
 12/31/2020  
 
Tranche B Options 4
 
 
 145,250
 4.85
 12/31/2020
  
 
Tranche C Options 5
 
 
 145,250
 4.85
 12/31/2020  
 
Tranche B RDUs 4
 
 
 
 
 
  48,417
 18,883
Tranche C RDUs 5
 
 
 
 
 
  48,417
 18,883
2013 Grant:              
Unit Options 6
 778,454
 
 
 1.42
 12/31/2020  
 
RDUs 7
 
 
 
 
 
  614,691
 239,729
Kevin W. McGuire               
2004 Stock Plan 2
               
Tranche A Options 46,929
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017  
 
Tranche B Options 46,929
 
 
 6.22
 12/31/2017
  
 
2011 Equity Plan:               
Tranche A Options 3
 118,710
     4.85
 12/31/2020
  
 


  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name (a) 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
(b)
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
(c)
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d)
 
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e)
 
Option
Expiration
Date
(f)
  
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)
(g)
 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
(h) (1)
Tranche B Options 4
 
 
 59,356
 4.85
 12/31/2020  
 
Tranche C Options 5
 
 
 59,356
 4.85
 12/31/2020  
 
Tranche B RDUs 4
 




 
 
  19,785
 7,716
Tranche C RDUs 5
 
 
 
 
 
 
19,785
 7,716
2013 Equity Plan:               
Unit Options 6
 244,906
 
 
 1.42
 1/25/2018
  
 
RDUs 7
 
 
 
 
 
 
193,385
 75,420
(1)Because equity interests in our ultimate parent, Hexion Holdings, are not publicly traded, there is no closing market price at the completion of the fiscal year. The market values shown in column (h) are based on the value of a unit of Hexion Holdings as of December 31, 2017, as determined by Hexion Holdings’ Board of Managers for management equity transaction purposes. In light of differences between the companies, including differences in capitalization, the value of a unit in Hexion Holdings does not necessarily equal the value of a share of the Company’s common stock.
(2)The “Tranche A” options vested over five years. The “Tranche B” options vested on August 12, 2012, the eighth anniversary of the grant date.
(3)
This award vested in four equal annual installments on each December 31st of 2011 through 2014.
(4)This award vests on the earlier to occur of (i) the two-year anniversary of the date that the common unit value is at least $10 following certain corporate transactions and (ii) six months following the date that the common unit value is at least $10 following certain change-in-control transactions.
(5)This award vests on the earlier to occur of (i) the one-year anniversary of the date that the common unit value is at least $15 following certain corporate transactions and (ii) six months following the date that the common unit value is at least $15 following certain change-in-control transactions.
(6)
This award vested in four equal annual installments on each December 31st of 2013 through 2016.
(7)This award vests on the earlier to occur of (i) the one-year anniversary of the date that the common unit value is at least $3.50 following certain corporate transactions and (ii) six months following the date that the common unit value is at least $3.50 following certain change-in-control transactions.
(8)This award time-vested over five years.
Narrative to Outstanding Equity Awards Table
2011 Equity Plan2019 MIP
2011 Grant
On February 23, 2011, our NEOs received awardsIn August 2019, the Board of RDUs and unit options inDirectors of Hexion Holdings Corporation approved a new long-term equity incentive plan for employees and directors of the Company (the “2019 MIP”). Grants under the 2011 Equity Plan. The RDUs2019 MIP are non-voting units of measurement that are deemed for bookkeeping purposes to be equivalent to onedenominated in common unitshares of Hexion Holdings. OfHoldings Corporation. Under the RDUs2019 MIP, participants may receive grants of options to purchase shares, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and options grantedother stock-based awards upon terms and conditions determined by the Board.

Grants of time-based and performance-based stock units were made in 2011, approximately 50% are “Tranche A RDUs”September 2019 and options with time-based vesting (subjectMarch 2020 to acceleration in the eventa select group of certain change-in-control transactions)Company leaders, including our Named Executive Officers. The amount of each award was based on the executive’s scope of responsibility, market data, contribution to value creation and approximately 50% are “Tranche Bother relevant factors determined by the Board in its discretion. Grants of time-based restricted stock units and C RDUs”performance-based stock units were made. The time-based awards require continued service and options withfunction as a retention incentive, while the performance-based vesting.
awards vest upon achievement of certain stock prices over a four-year period financial metrics, which we believe provides both a retention incentive and encourages the attainment of specific long-term financial objectives. The vestingmaterial terms of the RDUs and optionsgrants made to our Named Executive Officers under the 2019 MIP in 2020 are further described in footnotes 3-5 to the table above, in each case, are conditioned on the executive’s continued employment through the vesting dates mentioned above, subject to certain exceptions. The expiration date for the Tranche A, B, and C options for Mr. Morrison was extended to 12/31/2020 pursuant to his separation agreement. The expiration date for the Tranche A, B, and C options for Mr. McGuire was extended to 12/31/2020 pursuant to action by the compensation committee. With respect to any RDUs that vest as a result of a corporate or change-in-control transaction, such RDUs will be delivered promptly following the vesting date, or a cash payment will be delivered in settlement thereof, depending on the type of transaction. The RDUs and unit options contain restrictions on transferability and other customary terms and conditions. For information on the vested awards, see the Narrative to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.


2013 Grant
On March 8, 2013, our NEOs received awardsGrants of performance-based RDUs of Hexion Holdings and options to purchase units of Hexion Holdings under the 2011 Equity Plan. The RDUs are non-voting units of measurement which are deemed for bookkeeping purposes to be equivalent to one common unit of Hexion Holdings.Plan-Based Awards table.
The vesting terms of the unit options and RDUs described in footnotes 6 and 7 to the table above are each conditioned on the NEO’s continued employment through the vesting dates specified above, subject to certain exceptions. The expiration date for Mr. Morrison’s options were extended to 12/31/2020 pursuant to his separation agreement. With respect to any RDUs that vest as a result of a corporate or change-in-control transaction, such RDUs will be delivered promptly following the vesting date, or a cash payment will be delivered in settlement thereof, depending on the type of transaction. The unit options and RDUs contain restrictions on transferability and other customary terms and conditions.
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The Option Exercises and Stock Vested table is omitted since there were no such transactions for our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
PENSION BENEFITS
The following table presents information regarding the benefits payable to each of our NEOs at, following, or in connection with their retirement under the qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans of Hexionthe Company as of December 31, 2017.2020. The table does not provide information regarding the Company’s qualified or non-qualified defined contribution plans. The amounts shown in the table for each participant represent the present value of the annuitized benefit and do not represent the actual cash value of a participant’s account.
Name
(a)
Plan Name
(b)
Number of
Years Credited
Service
(#)
(c) (1)
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
(d)
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
(e)
Craig A. Rogerson(2)
Hexion U.S. Pension Plan— — — 
Hexion Supplemental Plan— — — 
George F. KnightHexion U.S. Pension Plan12.23 213,099 — 
Hexion Supplemental Plan11.74 102,774 — 
Douglas A. Johns(2)
Hexion U.S. Pension Plan— — — 
Hexion Supplemental Plan— — — 
Ann Frederix (2)
Hexion Belgium Pension Plan29.924,917,556 — 
Mark AlnessHexion U.S. Pension Plan31258,706 — 
Hexion Supplemental Plan30.5154,539 
Name
(a)
 
Plan Name
(b)
 
Number of
Years Credited
Service
(#)
(c) (1)
 
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
(d)
 
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
(e)
Craig Rogerson (2)
 Hexion U.S. Pension Plan 
 
 
  Hexion Supplemental Plan 
 
 
George F. Knight Hexion U.S. Pension Plan 12.23
 187,940
 
  Hexion Supplemental Plan 11.74
 88,295
 
Joseph P. Bevilaqua Hexion U.S. Pension Plan 7.25
 120,996
 
  Hexion Supplemental Plan 6.76
 159,905
 
Douglas A. Johns (2)
   
 
 
Nathan E. Fisher Hexion U.S. Pension Plan 6.33
 93,652
 
  Hexion Supplemental Plan 5.84
 29,567
 
Craig O. Morrison Hexion U.S. Pension Plan 7.27
 126,225
 
  Hexion Supplemental Plan 6.78
 
 (484,031)
Kevin W. McGuire(3)
 Hexion U.S. Pension Plan 6.65
 99,366
 
  Hexion Supplemental Plan 6.16
 
 (30,171)
(1)The number of years of credited service set forth in column (c) reflects the number of years between the NEO’s hire date and the earlier of (i) the plan freeze date, and (ii) December 31, 2020. The number of years of credited service is used to determine benefit accrual under the applicable plan.
(1)The number of years of credited service set forth in column (c) reflects the number of years between the NEO’s hire date and the plan freeze date, and is used to determine benefit accrual under the applicable plan.
(2)Messrs. Rogerson and Johns do not participate in the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan or the Hexion Supplemental Plan.
(3)Payments made during 2017 were made to Mr. McGuire’s surviving spouse.
(2)Messrs. Rogerson and Johns, and Ms. Frederix, do not participate in the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan or the Hexion Supplemental Plan.
Narrative to Pension Benefits Table
Hexion U.S. Pension Plan, Hexion Supplemental Plan and Hexion SupplementalBelgium Pension Plan
The benefits associated with the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan and Hexion Supplemental Plan were frozen June 30, 2009, and January 1, 2009, respectively. Although participants will continue to receive interest credits under the plans, no additional benefit credits will be provided. Prior to the freeze, the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan provided benefit credits equal to 3% of earnings up to the extent that this credit does not exceed the Social Securitysocial security wage base for the year, plus 6% of eligible earnings in excess of the social security wage base to covered U.S. associates,for the year, subject to the IRS-prescribed limit applicable to tax-qualified plans.
The Hexion Supplemental Plan provided non-qualified pension benefits in excess of allowable limits for the qualified pension plans. The benefit formula mirrored the qualified Hexion U.S. Pension Plan but applied only to eligible compensation above the federal limits for qualified plans. The accrued benefits are unfunded and are paid from our general assets upon the participant’s termination of employment with the Company.


Hexion Inc. | 144 | 2020 Form 10-K

The Hexion Supplemental Plan provided non-qualified pension benefits in excess of allowable limits for the qualified pension plans. The benefit formula mirrored the qualified Hexion U.S. Pension Plan but applied only to eligible compensation above the federal limits for qualified plans. The accrued benefits are unfunded and are paid from our general assets upon the participant’s termination of employment with the Company.
Under both the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan and Hexion Supplemental Plan, eligible earnings included annual incentive awards that were paid currently, but excluded any long-term incentive awards. Historically, the accrued benefits earned interest credits based on one-year Treasury bill rates until the participant begins to receive benefit payments. Effective January 1, 2012, the plans were amended to provide a minimum interest crediting rate of 300 basis points. The interest rate determined under the plan for fiscal 2016 was 3.0%. Participants vest after the completion of three years of service.
Messrs. Knight and BevilaquaAlness are both currently eligible for early retirement under the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan, both having met the eligibility criteria of having reached age 55 with 10 years of service with the Company. In addition,
Ms. Frederix, our NEO in Belgium, participates in a contributory defined benefit pension plan covering certain employees in Belgium. The benefit is determined based on salary as well as service history with the surviving spousecompany. The employee contributes between 1.5% to 5% of Mr. McGuireeligible earnings based on a specified formula and the company is eligibleresponsible for a death benefit under the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan.remainder of the cost.
For a discussion of the assumptions applied in calculating the benefits reported in the table above, please see Note 916 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The following table presents information with respect to each defined contribution or other plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified.
Name (a)Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(b)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
    (c) (1)
Aggregate
Earnings (Loss) in Last
FY
($)
(d)
Aggregate  Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
(e)
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
(f)
Craig A. Rogerson
Hexion Supplemental Plan— — — — — 
Hexion SERP— 88,050 4,191 — 190,660 
George F. Knight
Hexion Supplemental Plan— 6,394 — 216,616 
Hexion SERP— 28,007 3,478 — 133,327 
Douglas A. Johns
Hexion Supplemental Plan— — — — 
Hexion SERP 28,779 2,652 — 105,744 
Ann Frederix
Hexion Supplemental Plan— — — — 
         Hexion SERP— — — — — 
Mark I. Alness
Hexion Supplemental Plan— 5,293 — 179,332 
Hexion SERP— 14,974 3,384 — 122,927 
(1)    The amount shown in column (c) for the Hexion SERP is included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2020. These amounts were earned in 2019 and credited to the accounts by Hexion in 2020.



Hexion Inc. | 145 | 2020 Form 10-K

Name (a) 
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(b)
 
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(c)
 
Aggregate
Earnings (Loss) in Last
FY
($)
(d)
 
Aggregate  Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
(e)
 
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
(f)
Craig A. Rogerson 
 
 
 
 
George F. Knight          
Hexion Supplemental Plan 
 
 8,735
 
 197,995
Hexion SERP 1
 
 16,759
 1,718
 
 67,317
Hexion 2004 DC Plan 2
 
 
 (1,073) 
 8,367
Joseph P. Bevilaqua          
Hexion Supplemental Plan 
 
 17,043
 
 386,308
Hexion SERP 1
 
 58,054
 5,875
 
 230,588
Hexion 2004 DC Plan 2
 
 
 (4,020) 
 31,357
Douglas A. Johns          
Hexion SERP 1
 
 33,884
 579
 
 38,038
Nathan E. Fisher          
Hexion Supplemental Plan 
 
 1,219
 
 27,632
Hexion SERP 1
 
 14,270
 1,532
 
 59,669
Hexion 2004 DC Plan 2
 
 
 (1,877) 
 14,642
Craig O. Morrison          
Hexion Supplemental Plan 
 
 32,257
 (973,696) 
Hexion SERP 1
 
 79,195
 11,310
 
 426,203
Hexion 2004 DC Plan 2
 
 
 (2,412) (103,721) 
Kevin W. McGuire          
Hexion Supplemental Plan 
 
 1,245
 (37,036) 
Hexion SERP 1
 
 11,824
 847
 (54,733) 
Hexion 2004 DC Plan 2
 
 
 (375) (16,143) 
Table of Contents
(1)The amount shown in column (c) for the Hexion SERP is included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2016. These amounts were earned in 2016 and credited to the accounts by Hexion in 2017.
(2)The amount shown in column (f) is based on the number of vested units multiplied by the value of a common unit of Hexion Holdings on December 31, 2017, as determined by Hexion Holdings’ Board of Managers for management equity purposes.

Narrative to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
Hexion Supplemental Plan

Effective January 1, 2009, the benefits associated with this plan were frozen. This plan provided supplemental retirement benefits in the form of voluntary associate deferral opportunities and employer match on compensation earned above the IRS limit on qualified plans. The Hexion Supplemental Plan benefits are unfunded and paid from our general assets upon the associate’s termination of employment. Effective January 1, 2016, interest credits are made to the participants’ accounts at an interest rate determined by the Company, which has been defined as the greater of (i) the rate in the fixed income fund of the 401(k) Plan and (ii) 3%.


Hexion SERP

The Company adopted the Hexion SERP in 2011 to provide certain of itsour executives and other highly compensated associates, including our NEOs, an annual contribution of 5% of eligible earnings above the maximum limitations set by the IRS for contributions to a qualified defined contribution plan. Under the Hexion SERP, an unfunded non-qualified plan, eligible earnings are limited to base salary and amounts earned under the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan. Account credits are made to the plan during the third quarter of each year. Interest credits are provided in participants’ SERP accounts at an interest rate determined by the Company. Effective January 1, 2016, the interest rate determined by the Company is the greater of (i) the rate in the fixed income fund of the 401(k) Plan and (ii) 3%. This deferred compensation is paid six months following termination of employment.
Hexion 2004 DC Plan
In 2004, in connection with Apollo’s acquisition of the Company, Messrs. Craig Morrison, Knight, Bevilaqua, McGuire, and Fisher deferred the receipt of compensation and were credited with a number of deferred stock units (DCUs) in Hexion LLC equal in value to the amount of compensation deferred. The 2004 DC Plan is an unfunded plan. Any cash or units distributed pursuant to the 2004 DC Plan are distributable only upon a termination of employment or retirement. The NEOs mentioned above each have a put right, which can be exercised upon termination of employment to require the Company to pay them the then market value of the DCUs credited to their account. If the put right is not exercised, the NEO will be issued units in Hexion Holdings.
During 2017, Mr. Craig Morrison retired and Mr. McGuire terminated due to his sudden passing. Mr. Craig Morrison did not exercise his put right and instead was issued 241,211 common stock units in Hexion Holdings, which is equal to the number of DCUs he held at the time of his termination. Mr. McGuire held 37,543 DCUs at the time of his passing. Instead of issuing common stock units to his surviving spouse, the Company paid in cash settlement of his DCUs.
At December 31, 2017, the number of DCUs credited to the remaining NEOs were: Mr. Knight - 21,453; Mr. Bevilaqua - 80,403; and Mr. Fisher - 37,543.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL
The Company has employment agreements or letters with Messrs. Rogerson, Knight, Bevilaqua, and Johns. The section below describes the payments that may be made to our Named Executive Officers upon separation, pursuant to these individual agreements, applicable corporate practices, or in connection with a change in control. For payments made upon a retirement, other than in connection with a separation or change in control, also see the discussion in the Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation tables and related narratives above.
Severance/Termination Payments

The employment agreement with Mr. Rogerson provides that if Mr. Rogerson’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or he resigns for good reason (as defined in his employment agreement), the Company will provide him with an amount equal to 1.5two times the sum of (x) his annual base salary and (y) his target annual bonus, paid in equal installments for 1824 months, and continued COBRA coverage for 18 months at the expense of the Company (or until Mr. Rogerson becomes ineligible for such coverage), subject to his execution of a release of claims against the Company and his continued compliance with post-termination covenants. And provided further, if such termination of employment occurs following a change of control (as defined in the agreement), then the severance payment shall be equal to three times the sum of his annual base salary plus target bonus, such amounts to be paid in substantially equal installments for a period ending in 36 months. In addition, any accrued but unpaid compensation through the termination date (such as accrued but unpaid base salary, earned but unpaid bonus, and accrued and unused vacation) will be paid in a lump-sum payment at the time of termination. The employment agreement also contains an agreement to not disclose non-public information and a 12 month post-termination non-competition and non-solicitation agreement.

TheIn addition, the employment agreementsagreement with Messrs.Mr. Rogerson and Bevilaqua provideprovides that if the executive’sMr. Rogerson’s employment is terminated by the Company without causeupon or the executive resigns for good reasonfollowing a change-in-control (as defined in his employment agreement), the Company will provide him with continuedan amount equal to three times the sum of (x) his annual base salary and (y) his target annual bonus, paid in equal installments for 1836 months, and a lump sum payment equal to the estimated cost for the executive to continuecontinued COBRA coverage for 18 months. In addition, any accrued but unpaid compensation through the termination date will be paid in a lump-sum paymentmonths at the timeexpense of termination. The employment agreements also contain an agreement to not disclose non-public information; an agreement not to compete with the Company during the severance period, or, in the case(or until Mr. Rogerson becomes ineligible for such coverage), subject to his execution of a termination byrelease of claims against the Company for cause or by the executive without good reason, for 12 months following the date he ceases receiving any payments from the Company related to salary, bonus or severance; and a non-solicitation agreement for an additional year beyond the date he ceases receiving any payment from the Company related to salary, bonus or severance.his continued compliance with post-termination covenants.
Under Mr. Knight’s terms of employment, he would receive 18 months of continued base salary if his employment is terminated through no fault of his own. In addition to agreeing to not disclose non-public information, pursuant to the Management Investor Rights Agreement under the 2011 Equity Plan, Mr. Knight has agreed not to compete with the Company during the period he receives severance payments from the Company and not to solicit Company associates for one year following the date he ceases receiving severance payments from the Company.
Under Mr. Johns’ terms of employment, he would receive 18 months of continued base salary if his employment is terminated by the Company without cause. In addition to agreeing to not disclose non-public information, pursuant to the Management Investor Rights Agreement under the 2011 Equity Plan, Mr. Johns has agreed not to compete with the Company during the period he receives severance payments from the Company and not to solicit Company associates for one year following the date he ceases receiving severance payments from the Company. Upon
Ms. Frederix is entitled to severance based on local legislation in the event of involuntary termination bywithout cause.
Mr. Alness is entitled to severance based on the Company without cause or resignationstandard guidelines for good reason, Mr. Johns has a right to requirean E1 level executive from the Company to repurchase hisMarch 2014 MPM Severance Plan, which was adopted by Hexion Holdings unitsCorporation following emergence from Chapter 11. The standard guideline for their original cost, under the MPM 2007 Plan, as shown in the table below.


Under applicable corporatean E1 level executive are two (2) weeks of severance guidelines based uponper year of service with a minimum of thirty-six (36) weeks and a maximum of fifty-two (52) weeks. Based on his position and lengthyears of service with the Company,company, Mr. FisherAlness would be entitled to continued base salary payments for 52 weeks in the event his employment is terminated without cause. Severance payments under such guidelines are conditioned upon compliance with non-competition and non-solicitation covenants. In addition to agreeing to not disclose non-public information, pursuant to the Management Investor Rights Agreement under the 2011 Equity Plan Mr. Fisher has agreed not to compete with the Company during the period he receives severance payments from the Company and not to solicit Company associates for one year following the date he ceases receiving severance payments from the Company.receive fifty-two (52) weeks.


Retirement
Hexion Inc. | 146 | 2020 Form 10-K

Termination Payments
The following table describes payments our NEOs would have received had the individual’s employment been terminated by the Company without cause, or in the case of Messrs. Rogerson, and Bevilaqua, by the executive for good reason or a change-in-control, as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Name
Cash Severance ($)(1)
Estimated Value of Benefits
($)(2)
2019 LTI (3)
Restricted
Stock
Units(4)
Performance
Stock
Units (Refer to footnote)
Pension and Nonqualified Plan Payouts(5)
Craig A. Rogerson
Termination Without Cause5,625,000 35,195 1,667,420 2,858,333 (6)190,660 
Resignation with Good Reason5,625,000 35,195 2,858,333 (6)190,660 
Termination Due to Change-in-Control8,437,500 35,195 1,667,420 8,575,000 (7)190,660 
Change in Control— — — 8,575,000 (7)— 
George F. Knight
Termination Without Cause810,474 24,186 250,113 256,755 (6)665,816 
Resignation with Good Reason— — — — (8)665,816 
Termination Due to Change-in-Control— — 250,113 770,268 (7)665,816 
Change in Control— — — 770,268 (7)— 
Douglas A. Johns
Termination Without Cause815,890 47,479 208,428 210,870 (6)105,744 
Resignation with Good Reason— — — — (8)105,744 
Termination Due to Change-in-Control— — 208,428 632,615 (7)105,744 
Change in Control— — — 632,615 (7)— 
Ann Frederix
Termination Without Cause— — 118,702 145,677 (6)— 
Resignation with Good Reason— — — (8)— 
Termination Due to Change-in-Control— — 118,702 437,031 (7)— 
Change in Control— — — 437,031 (7)— 
Mark I. Alness
Termination Without Cause473,800 19,840 166,742 164,693 (6)615,504 
Resignation with Good Reason— — — — (8)615,504 
Termination Due to Change-in-Control— — 166,742 494,079 (7)615,504 
Change in Control— — — 494,079 (7)— 
(1)This column reflects cash severance payments due under the NEO’s employment agreement, or under the applicable severance guidelines of the Company, as described above, based on salary as of December 31, 2020. The cash severance due to Ms. Frederix would be based on applicable local legislation and company guidelines.
(2)This column reflects the estimated value of health care benefits and outplacement services. Under the Company’s severance guidelines, each NEO, other than Ms.Frederix, would be entitled to 12 months of executive outplacement services in the event of a termination through no fault of their own. The values are based upon the Company’s estimated cost of providing such benefits as of December 31,2020.
(3)The amount shown in this column is the amount that would be due pursuant to the 2019 LTI plan provisions.
(4)Amounts shown reflect the value of outstanding restricted stock units that would be due pursuant to plan and award agreement provisions, calculated based on the year-end stock price of Hexion Holdings Corporation.
(5)The amounts shown reflect the value of vested benefits as of December 31, 2020 for each of the other NEOs.
(6)The performance stock units granted on September 9, 2019 (the “2019 PSUs”) vest based on stock price and, upon termination without cause and, in Mr. Rogerson’s case, resignation with good reason, on December 31, 2020, the 2019 PSUs would continue to have the opportunity to vest, based on stock price, for the one-year period following termination of employment. Any 2019 PSUs that subsequently vest during the one-year period following termination of employment would be settled in shares of Hexion Holdings Corporation common stock in July 2022. The performance stock units granted on March 9, 2020 (the “2020 PSUs”) are earned based on achievement of specified Company performance criteria measured for the trailing twelve month period ending December 31, 2022. Upon termination without cause and, in Mr. Rogerson’s case, resignation with good
Hexion Inc. | 147 | 2020 Form 10-K

Name Cash Severance ($) (1) 
Estimated Value of Benefits
($)
(2)
 2017 ICP ($) (3) 
MPM 2007 Plan ($)
(4)
Craig A. Rogerson 3,000,000
 40,631
 1,000,000
 
George F. Knight 730,313
 21,329
 76,063
 
Joseph P. Bevilaqua 946,662
 28,386
 112,681
 
Nathan E. Fisher 408,230
 37,630
 196,344
 
Douglas A. Johns 775,820
 40,631
 80,802
 250,000
reason, on December 31, 2020, one-third of the 2020 PSUs would remain outstanding and eligible to be earned based on achievement of the performance criteria. Any 2020 PSU’s subsequently earned would vest and be settled in shares of Hexion Holdings Corporation common stock in July 2023.
(1)This column reflects cash severance payments due under the NEO’s employment agreement, or under the applicable severance guidelines of the Company, as described above, based on salary as of December 31, 2017.
(2)This column reflects the estimated value of health care benefits and outplacement services. Under the Company’s severance guidelines, each NEO would be entitled to 12 months of executive outplacement services in the event of a termination through no fault of his own. The values are based upon the Company’s estimated cost of providing such benefits as of December 31, 2017.
(3)This column reflects the amount earned by each executive under the 2017 ICP, which would be paid if he or she was employed on December 31, 2017, but incurred a termination of employment by the Company without cause (or in the case of Mr. Bevilaqua, by the executive for good reason) prior to payment. The incentive payment would be forfeited if the executive resigns (in the case of Mr. Bevilaqua, without good reason) or incurs a termination of employment by the Company for cause prior to payment.
(4)This column reflects the cost of Mr. Johns’ initial investment in Hexion Holdings, which he may require Hexion Holdings to purchase in the event he is terminated by the Company without cause, or leaves for good reason, as defined in the MPM 2007 Plan.
(7)With respect to the 2019 PSUs, upon a change in control, the 20 consecutive trading-day volume weighted average price per share of Hexion Holdings Corporation common stock (“VWAP”) shall be deemed to equal the per share price of Hexion Holdings Corporation common stock implied (or actually paid) in the change in control transaction as of such change in control, and the performance period shall expire immediately following such change in control. Any PSUs that vest based on the VWAP, as well as any previously vested PSUs, shall be settled within 10 days following such change in control in an amount of cash equal to the fair market value of such PSUs on the date of the change in control. With respect to the 2020 PSUs, if a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period, the performance period shall expire immediately following such change in control, and a number of PSUs equal to the product of (x) the number of PSUs granted multiplied by (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days that elapsed from January 1, 2020 through the date of the change in control and the denominator of which is the number of days from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, shall be deemed earned and shall vest immediately upon such change in control. Any PSUs that are deemed earned shall vest and be settled as soon as administratively feasible, but in no event later than 14 days following such change in control, in an amount of cash equal to the fair market value of such vested PSUs on the date of the change in control.
(8)Messrs. Knight, Johns, Alness, and Ms. Frederix, do not have a resignation with good reason provision in employment arrangements that would entitle them to any additional benefits beyond any benefits that have already vested as of December 31, 2020.
In addition to these benefits, our NEOs would also generally be entitled to receive the benefits set forth above in the Pension Benefits Table and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table following a termination of employment for any reason.
Other Change-in-Control Payments
As noted above in the Narrative to the Outstanding Equity Awards Table, our    NEOs will be entitled to accelerated vesting of their outstanding unvested equity awards under the 2011 Equity Plan2019 MIP, as reflected above, in connection with certain corporate transactions or change-in-control transactions. In addition, under the 2016 LTIP Awards, the service components of the awards would be deemed satisfied upon a change-in-control transaction but the performance conditions would not be accelerated. The exercise pricesdeemed satisfied upon a change-in-control transaction.

Hexion Inc. | 148 | 2020 Form 10-K

PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, following is information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annualized total compensation of Mr. Craig Rogerson, our CEO. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
For the most recently completed fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:2020:
The median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (other than our CEO) was $69,123;$78,495; and
The annualizedannual total compensation of our CEO was $2,530,223.$7,807,674.
Pay Ratio
Annual Total Compensation of Mr. Rogerson, our CEO Median of the Annual Total Compensation of All Employees Pay RatioAnnual Total Compensation of Mr. Rogerson, our CEOMedian of the Annual Total Compensation of All EmployeesPay Ratio
$2,530,223 $69,123 37 to 1
$7,807,674$7,807,674$78,49599
Methodology
The assumptions used to identify the annual total compensation    Consistent with Item 402(u) of all of our employees and our “median employee” are as follows:
As of October 1, 2017, there were 4,245 active Hexion employees in the U.S. and 25 other countries. We selected October 1st as the date at whichRegulation S-K, we would select our median employee to allow sufficient time to gather the data, given the complexity and scope of our business.
Hexion excluded 197 employees in 13 countries under the “de minimus” exception permitted by the SEC rules. This exception allows an exclusion of up to 5% of employees, provided that all employees within a given country be excluded when this exception is exercised, and U.S. employees cannot be excluded. The exclusions are reflected in the table below:
CountryNumber of Employees Excluded
Spain94
India30
South Korea30
Malaysia19
Taiwan4
Uruguay4
United Arab Emirates3
France3
Japan3
Singapore3
Russian Federation2
Czech Republic1
Thailand1
TOTAL197
Total gross compensation from our local payroll systems was used as our compensation measure to determine the median employee, using data for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. We believe compensation is generally spread evenly through the fiscal year, except for our global incentive compensation, which is generally paid in the second and third quarters.
Total gross compensation was not annualized for employees hired during 2017.
Cost-of-living adjustments were not calculated when identifyinghave determined the median paid employee.
September 2017 year-to-date average foreign exchange rates were used to translate the local currency total gross compensation to U.S. dollars when identifying the median paid employee. December 2017 year-to-dateemployee’s to-date average foreign exchange rates were used to translate the local currency to U.S dollars for the median paid employee’s annual total compensation.
employee for 2020. The pay ratio was calculated using357 to 1 in 2019, primarily due to the annualized pay forone-time stock award granted to Mr. Rogerson our CEO, whoin 2019. In 2020, the pay ratio decreased to 99 to 1, as Mr. Rogerson’s 2020 annual grant was hired on July 10, 2017. less than his one-time stock award in 2019.
The table below lists the components of annualized total compensation for Mr. Rogerson:
Compensation Component Annualized Amount
Salary $1,000,000
Non-Equity Incentive Plan 1,000,000
All Other Compensation:  
Employer 401(k) match (qualified plan)
 13,500
Employer annual retirement contribution (qualified plan)
 8,100
Employer supplemental executive retirement plan contribution (non-qualified plan)
 36,500
Commuting and housing allowance, including tax gross-up 472,123
Total annualized compensation $2,530,223



Compensation ComponentAnnualized Amount
Salary$1,250,000 
Bonus99,445 
Stock Awards5,925,000 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan415,953 
Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings2,235 
All Other Compensation:
Employer 401(k) match (qualified plan)
14,250 
Employer annual retirement contribution (qualified plan)
8,550 
Employer supplemental executive retirement plan contribution, including interest credits (non-qualified plan)
92,241 
Commuting and housing allowance, including tax gross-up— 
Total annualized compensation$7,807,674
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table presents information regarding the compensation earned or paid during 20172020 to our directors who are not also NEOs and who served on the Board of ManagersDirectors of Hexion Holdings during the year.
NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
Stock AwardsTotal
($)
Carol S. Eicher(1)
117,500 326,523 444,023 
Patrick Bartels(1)
125,000 326,523 451,523 
Joaquin Delgado(1)
110,000 326,523 436,523 
Jeffrey D. Benjamin(1)
170,000 410,800 580,800 
James N. Chapman(1)
140,000 326,523 466,523 
Stephen D. Newlin(1)
110,000 326,523 436,523 
Michael J. Shannon(1)
125,000 326,523 451,523 
John K. Wulff(1)
130,000 326,523 456,523 
Name 
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
 
Total
($)
Samuel Feinstein 90,000
 90,000
William H. Joyce 88,000
 88,000
Robert Kalsow-Ramos 92,000
 92,000
Scott M. Kleinman 87,000
 87,000
Geoffrey A. Manna 89,000
 89,000
Jonathan Rich 88,000
 88,000
Marvin O. Schlanger 90,000
 90,000


Narrative to the Director Compensation Table
Each of our directors who is not an associate or officer    The members of the new independent board of directors were selected based on their qualifications and prior experience in the chemical industry and prior service on similar boards.  The Company receivesengaged a consultant to assist with determining our new directors’ compensation arrangements based on a review and analysis of the director compensation arrangements of the Company’s peer group of companies.  Based on that analysis and the consultant’s recommendation, as well as the level of activity expected of the Company’s directors
Hexion Inc. | 149 | 2020 Form 10-K

over the next few years, the Company adopted the following compensation arrangement for directors which will be evaluated on an annual retainer of $75,000 payable quarterly in advance. In addition, each such director receives $2,000 for each meeting of the Board that he attends in person and $1,000 for attending teleconference meetings or for participating in regularly scheduled in-person meetings via teleconference.basis:
During 2017, there were no stock or option awards granted to directors, and there are no outstanding, unvested stock awards held by these directors. The aggregate number of unexercised option awards held by our directors at December 31, 2017 is shown in the following table.
Director Unexercised Option Awards (#) Vested (#)
Samuel Feinstein  
William H. Joyce 127,103 127,103
Robert Kalsow-Ramos  
Scott M. Kleinman 
213,850(1)
 
185,709(2)
Geoffrey A. Manna  
Jonathan Rich 1,013,795 1,013,795
Marvin O. Schlanger 405,470 405,470
(1)Compensation TypeAmount includes 86,747 options scheduled to expire on 12/31/17.($)
Regular Board Service Annual Cash Retainer100,000
Regular Board Service Annual Equity Grant110,000
Lead Director Annual Cash Retainer130,000
Lead Director Annual Equity Grant140,000
Audit Committee Chair Retainer25,000
Compensation Committee Chair Retainer20,000
Nominating & Governance Committee Chair Retainer12,500
Environmental, Health & Safety Committee Chair Retainer20,000
Listing Committee Chair Retainer25,000
Audit Committee Member Retainer10,000
Listing Committee Member Retainer10,000
Compensation Committee Member Retainer5,000
Nominating & Governance Committee Member Retainer5,000
Environmental, Health & Safety Committee Member Retainer5,000

    During 2020, Directors received grants of time-based restricted stock units (RSUs) on January 31, 2020 and August 14, 2020. The RSUs granted on January 31, 2020 reflect the initial equity grant made to directors following the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 on July 1, 2019. These RSUs vest in three equal annual installments on July 1, 2020, July 1, 2021 and July 1, 2022. The RSUs granted on August 14, 2020 reflect the 2020 annual equity grant and vest in three equal annual installments on June 1, 2021, June 1, 2022 and June 1, 2023. Settlement of the RSUs granted on August 14, 2020 is deferred until the Director leaves Board service. The table below shows the current number of unvested RSUs held by each of our directors.

(2)NameAmount includes 58,606 options scheduled to expire on 12/31/17.Unvested
RSUs
Carol S. Eicher16,222 
Patrick Bartels16,222 
Joaquin Delgado16,222 
Jeffrey D. Benjamin20,445 
James N. Chapman16,222 
Stephen D. Newlin16,222 
Michael J. Shannon16,222 
John K. Wulff16,222 
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION


Messrs. Kleinman, Feinstein,Benjamin, Chapman, Newlin, and Kalsow-Ramos,Wulff, whose names appear on the Compensation Committee Report above, are not employed by Apollo Management, L.P., our indirect controlling shareholder. NeitherHexion Holdings. None of these directors is or has been an executive officer of the Company. None of our executive officers served as a director or a member of a compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, the executive officers of which served as a director or member of our Compensation Committee during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2020.


Hexion Inc. | 150 | 2020 Form 10-K

ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Hexion Holdings is our ultimate parent company and indirectly owns 100% of our capital stock. The following table sets forth information available to the Company regarding the beneficial ownership of Hexion Holdings, common units, as of March 1, 2018,December 31, 2020, unless otherwise noted below, and showsshowing the combined number of unitsClass B common Stock and warrants, granting rights to purchase Class B Common Stock, and the percentage owned by:
 
each person known to beneficially own more than 5% of the Class B common unitsStock of Hexion Holdings;
 
each of Hexion’s 20172020 Named Executive Officers;
 
each current member of the Board of ManagersDirectors of Hexion Holdings; and
 
all of the executive officers and current members of the Board of ManagersDirectors of Hexion Holdings as a group.
As of March 1, 2018,December 31, 2020, Hexion Holdings had 308,843,407 common units58,529,727 Class B Common Stock issued and outstanding.57,568,295 outstanding as well as 10,177,908 outstanding warrants. The amounts and percentages of common units and warrants beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to which he has no economic interest. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, each of the beneficial owners has, to our knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the indicated common units,Class B Common Stock and warrants, and has not pledged any such units as security.
 Beneficial Ownership
of Equity Securities
Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount of Beneficial OwnershipPercent of Outstanding Equity
Funds affiliated with Goldentree Asset Management, LP(1)
13,423,984 21.5%
Funds and managed accounts affiliated with Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P.(2)
9,205,306 14.9%
Funds affiliated with Monarch Alternative Capital LP(3)
6,603,589 11.2%
Funds affiliated with Blackstone(4)
5,568,963 9.7%
Funds affiliated with Brigade Capital Management, L.P.(5)
4,628,811 8.0%
Funds affiliated with Davidson Kempner Capital Management, L.P.(6)
3,911,170 6.8%
Funds affiliated with Capital Research & Management Company (U.S.)(7)
3,185,752 5.5%
Funds affiliated with Oak Hill Advisors, L.P.(8)
3,127,867 5.4%
Funds affiliated with Loomis Sayles & Company, L.P.(9)
3,055,040 5.3%
Patrick J. Bartels(10)
— *
Jeffrey D. Benjamin(10)
— *
James N. Chapman(10)
— *
Joaquin Delgado(10)
— *
Carol S. Eicher(10)
— *
Michael J. Shannon(10)
— *
John K. Wulff(10)
— *
Stephen D. Newlin(10)
— *
Craig A. Rogerson (11)
— *
George F. Knight (11)
— *
John P. Auletto (11)
— *
Nathan E. Fisher (11)
— *
Douglas A. Johns (11)
— *
Matthew A. Sokol (11)
— *
Paul G. Barletta (11)
— *
Ann Frederix (11)
— *
Mark Alness(11)
— *
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group— *
 *    less than 1%
(1)As of February 16, 2021. Includes 4,762,314 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrants issued on July 1, 2019. The shares and warrants are owned by funds managed by GoldenTree Asset Management, LP, whose address is 300 Park Ave, New York, NY 10022.
Hexion Inc. | 151 | 2020 Form 10-K

  
Beneficial Ownership
of Equity Securities
Name of Beneficial Owner Amount of Beneficial Ownership Percent of Class
Apollo Funds (1)
 278,426,128
 86.6%
ASF Radio, L.P. (2)
 25,491,297
 7.9%
Geoffrey A. Manna (3)
 
 *
Scott M. Kleinman (4) (5)
 185,709
 *
Samuel Feinstein (4) (5)
 
 *
William H. Joyce (5) (6)
 127,103
 *
Robert Kalsow-Ramos (4)
 
 *
Jonathan D. Rich (7)
 1,495,692
 *
Marvin O. Schlanger (8)
 1,027,068
 *
Craig A. Rogerson (11)
 
 *
George F. Knight (9) (11)
 131,842
 *
Joseph P. Bevilaqua (10) (11)
 861,886
 *
Nathan E. Fisher (11) (12)
 497,045
 *
Douglas A. Johns (11) (13)
 529,860
 *
Craig O. Morrison (11) (14)
 2,010,027
 *
Kevin W. McGuire(11)(15)
 497,045
 *
All Managers and Executive Officers as a group (16)
 8,332,595
 2.6%
 *less than 1%
(1)Represents (i) 102,454,557 common units held of record by Apollo Investment Fund VI, L.P. (“AIF VI”); (ii) 94,365,980 common units held of record by AP Momentive Holdings LLC (“AP Momentive Holdings”); (iii) 75,154,788 common units held of record by AIF Hexion Holdings, L.P. (“AIF Hexion Holdings”); and (iv) 6,450,803 common units held of record by AIF Hexion Holdings II, L.P. (“AIF Hexion Holdings II,” and together with AIF VI, AP Momentive Holdings and AIF Hexion Holdings, the “Apollo Funds”). The amount reported as beneficially owned does not include common units held or beneficially owned by certain of the directors, executive officers and other members of our management or of Momentive Holdco, for which the Apollo Funds and their affiliates have voting power and the power to cause the sale of such shares under certain circumstances.

(2)As of February 16, 2021. Includes 4,151,668 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrants issued on July 1, 2019. The address of Cyrus Capital Partners, LP is 65 East 55 Street, 34th Floor, New York, NY 10022
Apollo Advisors VI, L.P.(3)As of February 16, 2021. Includes 1,263,926 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrants issued on July 1, 2019. Monarch Alternative Capital LP (“Advisors VI”MAC”) isserves as advisor or agent to certain funds and entities that hold the general partnersecurities referenced.  By virtue of AIF VI, and Apollo Capital Management VI, LLCthe agreements governing such relationships, MAC may be deemed to beneficially own such securities.  MDRA GP LP (“ACM VI”) is the general partner of Advisors VI. AIF IV Hexion GP, LLC (“AIF IV Hexion GP”) and AIF V Hexion GP, LLC (“AIF V Hexion GP”) are the general partners of AIF Hexion Holdings. AIF Hexion Holdings II GP, LLC (“Hexion Holdings IIMDRA GP”) is the general partner of AIF Hexion Holdings II. Apollo Investment Fund IV, L.P.MAC and its parallel investment vehicle (collectively, the “AIF IV Funds”) are the members of AIF IV Hexion GP. Apollo Advisors IV, L.P. (“Advisors IV”) is the general partner or managing general partner of each of the AIF IV Funds, and Apollo Capital Management IV, Inc. (“ACM IV”) is the general partner of Advisors IV. Apollo Investment Fund V, L.P. and its parallel investment vehicles (collectively, the “AIF V Funds”) are the members of AIF V Hexion GP and of Hexion Holdings II GP. Apollo Advisors V, L.P. (“Advisors V”) is the general partner, managing general partner or managing limited partner of each of the AIF V Funds, and Apollo Capital Management V, Inc. (“ACM V”) is the general partner of Advisors V. Apollo Principal Holdings I, L.P. (“Principal Holdings I”) is the sole stockholder or sole member, as applicable, of each of ACM IV, ACM V and ACM VI. Apollo Principal Holdings IMonarch GP LLC (“Principal Holdings IMonarch GP”) is the general partner of Principal Holdings I.MDRA GP.  By virtue of such relationships, MAC, MDRA GP and Monarch GP may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over the securities.  The address for these entities is 535 Madison Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10022.
Apollo Management VI, L.P. (“Management VI”) is(4)As of February 16, 2021. Represents (i) 375,006 shares held directly by GSO Churchill Partners LP, (ii) 1,708,340 shares held directly by GSO Credit Alpha II Trading (Cayman) LP, and (iii) 3,485,617 shares held directly by GSO CSF III Holdco (Cayman) LP (and, collectively with GSO Churchill Partners LP and GSO Credit Alpha II Trading (Cayman) LP, the manager of AP Momentive Holdings, and AIF VI Management,“BXC Funds”).  GSO Churchill LLC (“AIF VI LLC”) is the general partner of Management VI. Apollo Management IV, L.P. (“Management IV”) is the manager of each of the AIF IV Funds. Apollo Management V, L.P. (“Management V”) is the manager of each of the AIF V Funds, and AIF V Management, LLC (“AIF V LLC”)GSO Churchill Partners LP.  GSO Credit Alpha Associates II LP is the general partner of Management V. Apollo Management, L.P. (“Apollo Management”) is the managingGSO Credit Alpha II Trading (Cayman) LP.  The general partnerpartners of Management IV and the sole member and manager of AIF VGSO Credit Alpha Associates II LP are GSO Credit Alpha Associates II (Delaware) LLC and AIF VI LLC. Apollo Management GP, LLC (“Management GP”)GSO Credit Alpha Associates II (Cayman) Ltd.  GSO Capital Solutions Associates III LP is the general partner of Apollo Management. Apollo ManagementGSO CSF III Holdco (Cayman) LP.  The general partners of GSO Capital Solutions Associates III LP are GSO Capital Solutions Associates III (Delaware) LLC and GSO Capital Solutions Associates III (Cayman) Ltd.  GSO Holdings L.P. (“Management Holdings”)I L.L.C. is the solemanaging member of each of GSO Churchill LLC, GSO Credit Alpha Associates II (Delaware) LLC and managerGSO Capital Solutions Associates III (Delaware) LLC, and a shareholder of Managementeach of GSO Credit Alpha Associates II (Cayman) Ltd. and GSO Capital Solutions Associates III (Cayman) Ltd.  Blackstone Holdings II L.P. is the managing member of GSO Holdings I L.L.C. with respect to securities beneficially owned by the BXC Funds.  Blackstone Holdings I/II GP and Apollo Management Holdings GP, LLC (“Management Holdings GP”)L.L.C. is the general partner of Blackstone Holdings II L.P.  The Blackstone Group Inc. is the sole member of Blackstone Holdings I/II GP L.L.C. Blackstone Group Management Holdings.
Leon Black, Joshua HarrisL.L.C. is the sole holder of the Class C common stock of The Blackstone Group Inc. Blackstone Group Management L.L.C. is wholly-owned by Blackstone’s senior managing directors and Marc Rowan arecontrolled by its founder, Stephen A. Schwarzman.  Each of the managersforegoing entities and Mr. Schwarzman disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held directly by the BXC Funds (other than the BXC Funds to the extent of their direct holdings). The principal business address of each is 345 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10154.
(5)As of February 17, 2021. Brigade is Brigade Capital Management, Holdings GPLP (on behalf of its various funds and Principal Holdings I GP, as well as executive officers of Management Holdings GP, and as such may be deemed to have voting and dispositive control of the common units held of record by the Apollo Funds. accounts). The address is 399 Park Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10022.
(6)The address of each of the Apollo Funds, AIF IV Hexion GP, AIF V Hexion GP, the AIF IV Funds, Advisors IV, ACM IV, the AIF V Funds, Advisors V, ACM V, Advisors VI, ACM VI, Principal Holdings I and Principal Holdings I GPDavidson Kempner Capital Management, L.P. is One Manhattanville Road, Suite 201, Purchase,520 Madison Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, 10577.NY 10022. The share amount listed has been obtained from a third-party source and has not been confirmed by Davidson Kempner Capital Management, L.P.
(7)As of January 22, 2021. The address of eachCapital Research & Management Company is 333 S. Hope St., 55th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. The share amount listed has been obtained from a third-party source and has not been confirmed by Capital Research & Management Company.
(8)As of Management IV, Management V, AIF V LLC, Management VI, AIF VI LLC, Apollo Management, Management GP, Management Holdings, Management Holdings GP, and Messrs. Black, Harris and Rowan,January 22, 2021. The address of Oak Hill Advisors, L.P. is 9 West 57th Street, 43rd 114 Avenue of the Americas, 27th Floor, New York, New York 10019.NY 10036. The share amount listed has been obtained from a third-party source and has not been confirmed by Oak Hill Advisors, L.P.
(2)Includes 6,003,363 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant issued on December 4, 2006. Also includes 77,103 common units issuable upon the exercise of an option that is currently exercisable. The address of ASF Radio, L.P. is 1370 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019.
(3)
The address for Mr. Manna is 8400 SW 54th Ave. Miami, FL 33143.
(4)The address for Messrs Kleinman, Feinstein and Kalsow-Ramos is c/o Apollo Management L.P., 9 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019.
(5)Represents common units issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable, or exercisable by December 31, 2020.
(6)The address for Dr. Joyce is c/o Advanced Fusion Systems LLC, 11 Edmond Road, Newtown, CT 06470.
(7)Includes 1,013,795 common units issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable by April 30, 2018. The address for Dr. Rich is 276 Live Oak Drive, Vero Beach, FL 32963.
(8)
Includes 405,470 common units issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable by April 30, 2018. The address for Mr. Schlanger is c/o Cherry Hill Chemical Investments, One Greentree Centre, 10000 Lincoln Drive East, Suite 201, Marlton, NJ 08053.
(9)Includes 121,051 common units issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable by April 30, 2018. Does not include 21,453 vested deferred units credited to Mr. Knight’s account.
(10)
Includes 800,714common units issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable by April 30, 2018. Does not include 80,403 vested deferred units credited to Mr. Bevilaqua’s account.
(11)The address for Messrs. Rogerson, Knight, Bevilaqua, Fisher, Johns, Morrison, and McGuire is c/o Hexion Inc., 180 E. Broad St., Columbus, Ohio 43215.
(12)Includes 457,474 common units issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable by April 30, 2018. Does not include 37,543 vested deferred units credited to Mr. Fisher’s account.
(13)Includes 413,320 common units issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable by April 30, 2018.
(14)Includes 1,671,983 common units issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable by April 30, 2018.
(15)Includes 457,474 common units issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable by April 30, 2018.
(16)Includes 6,507,032 common units issuable upon the exercise of options granted to our directors and executive officers that are currently exercisable or exercisable by April 30, 2018. Does not include 139,399 of vested deferred common stock units.
We have(9)The address of Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P. is One Financial Ctr., Boston, MA 02111.
(10)The address for Messrs. Bartels, Benjamin, Chapman, Delgado, Shannon, Wulff, Newlin and Ms. Eicher is c/o Hexion Inc., 180 E. Broad St., Columbus, Ohio 43215
(11)The address for Messrs. Rogerson, Knight, Auletto, Fisher, Johns, Sokol, Barletta, Alness and Ms. Frederix is c/o Hexion Inc., 180 E. Broad St., Columbus, Ohio 43215.
As of December 31, 2020, Hexion Inc. has no compensation plans that authorize issuing our common stock to employees or non-employees. In addition, there have been no sales or repurchases of our equity securities during the past fiscal year. However, we and our direct and indirect parent companies have in the pastParent Company, Hexion Holdings, has issued and may issue from time to time equity awards to our employees and directors that are denominated in or based upon the common unitsClass B Common Stock of our direct or ultimate parent.Hexion Holdings. As the awards were granted in exchange for service to us these awards are included in our consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of these equity plans see Note 1016 in Item 8 of Part II and Item 11 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, our Parent Company, Hexion Holdings, has repurchased 961,432 Class B Common Stock and 47,537 warrants during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Hexion Inc. | 152 | 2020 Form 10-K

ITEM 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
We have a written Statement of Policy and Procedures Regarding Related Person Transactions that has been adopted by our Board of Directors.
The policy requires the Company to establish and maintain procedures for identifying potential or existing transactions between the Company and related persons. The policy generally adopts the definitions of “related person” and “transaction” set forth in Regulation S-K Item 404 under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The types of transactions that are covered by our policy include financial and other transactions, arrangements or relationships in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a participant and in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest, where the amount involved exceeds $75,000.
Related persons include directors and director nominees, executive officers, shareholders beneficially owning more than 5% of the Company’s voting stock, and immediate family members of any of the previously described persons. A related person could also be an entity in which a director, executive officer or 5% shareholder is an employee, general partner or 5% shareholder.
Transactions identified by management that are between the Company and a related person that involve amounts exceeding $75,000 will be reviewed by the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee, or another appropriate committee of the Board of Directors. In certain situations, the Board or a committee may delegate authority to an individual Board member to review related person transactions.
Under the policy, the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors is directed to approve only those related person transactions that are determined by them in good faith to be in, or not inconsistent with, the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. In making this determination, all available, relevant facts and circumstances will be considered, including the benefits to the Company; the impact of the transaction on the related person’s independence; the availability of other sources of comparable products or services; the terms of the transaction; and the terms available to unrelated third parties or to employees in general.
Our policy recognizes that there are situations where related person transactions may be in, or may not be inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, especially while we are a “controlled company.”
There were no material related person transactions where our policies and procedures did not require review, approval or ratification or where such policies and procedures were not followed.
Related Transactions
Transactions with Apollo
    As of the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy on July 1, 2019, Apollo is no longer a related party to the Company. The disclosures below are through July 1, 2019 and only reflect the time period when Apollo was a related party. Sales to various Apollo affiliates were $1 million and $2 million for the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no purchases during the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Management Consulting Agreement
We are subjectThe Company was party to an Amended and Restateda Management Consulting Agreement with Apollo (the “Management Consulting Agreement”) that renews on an annual basis, unless noticepursuant to which the contrary is given by either party. Under the Management Consulting Agreement, we receiveCompany received certain structuring and advisory services from Apollo and its affiliates. The Management Consulting Agreement provides indemnification to Apollo its affiliates and their directors, officers and representatives for potential losses arising from these services. Apollo iswas entitled to an annual fee equal to the greater of $3 million or 2% of ourthe Company’s Adjusted EBITDA. In conjunction with the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings and the Support Agreement filed on April 1, 2019, Apollo electedagreed to waive charges of any portion of theits annual management fee due in excessfor 2019. In connection with the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, the Management Consulting Agreement was terminated pursuant to the Confirmation Order, as of $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.Effective Date.
Transactions with MPM
    As of May 15, 2019, MPM was no longer under the common control of Apollo and, accordingly, is no longer a related party to the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized an expense under2018, the Management Consulting AgreementCompany sold less than $1 million of $3 million. The Management Consulting Agreement also providesproducts to MPM. There were no products sold to MPM during the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019. During the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company earned less than $1 million from MPM as compensation for a lump-sum settlement equal to the net present valueacting as distributor of the remaining annual management fees payable under the remaining termproducts and had purchases of the agreement in connection with a sale or initial public offering by us.$10 million and $32 million, respectively.
Hexion Inc. | 153 | 2020 Form 10-K

Shared Services Agreement and Other Agreements with MPM and its Subsidiaries
On October 1, 2010, we entered intoThe Company previously held a shared services agreement with Momentive Performance Materials Inc. (‘MPM”) (which, from October 1, 2010 through October 24, 2014, was a subsidiary of Hexion Holdings), as amended in October 2014MPM (the “Shared Services Agreement”). Under this agreement, we providethe Company provided to MPM, and MPM providesprovided to us,the Company, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, legal and procurement services. TheOn March 14, 2019, MPM terminated the Shared Services Agreement, establishes certain criteria upon which the costs of such services are allocated between the parties. The Shared Services Agreement was renewedtriggered a transition period for one year starting October 2017 and is subject to termination by either of the parties without cause, on not less than 30 days’ written notice, and expires in October 2018 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter; absent contrary notice from either party). We periodically review the scopework together to facilitate an orderly transition of services. The transition of services provided under this agreement.
Pursuant to this agreement, duringwas completed on September 1, 2020. During the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2017, we2018, the Company incurred approximately $48$15 million and $28 million, respectively, of net costs for shared services and MPM incurred approximately $38$14 million and $21 million of net costs for shared services. Included in the net costs incurred during the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 20172018 were net billings from usHexion to MPM of $26 million. These net billings were made to bring the percentage of total net incurred costs for shared services under the Shared Services Agreement to 56% for us$11 million and 44% for MPM, as well as to reflect costs allocated 100% to one party. We had accounts receivable from MPM of $3$14 million, as of December 31, 2017, and no accounts payable to MPM.

We also sell products to, and purchase products from, MPM. We sold less than $1 million of products to MPM during 2017, and we purchased $24 million of products from MPM. During 2017, we earned $1 million from MPM as compensation for acting as distributor of products. As of December 31, 2017, we had no accounts receivable from MPM and $2 million of accounts payable to MPM related to these agreements.
Purchases and Sales of Products and Services with Affiliates Other than MPM
We sell products to various Apollo affiliates other than MPM. These sales were $4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Accounts receivable from these affiliates were less than $1 million at December 31, 2017. We also purchase raw materials and services from various Apollo affiliates other than MPM. There were no purchases for the year ended December 31, 2017. We had no accounts payable to these affiliates at December 31, 2017.respectively.
Other Transactions and Arrangements
We sellIn March 2020, the Company entered into a $10 million short term affiliate loan with its Parent at a 0% interest rate to fund Parent share repurchases. In June 2020, the Company made a $10 million non-cash distribution to its Parent treated as a return of capital to settle this affiliate loan. The Company made an additional $3 million return of capital distribution to its Parent to fund additional Parent share repurchases in December 2020. This return of capital reduced “Paid-in capital” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2020.
The Company sells products and provideprovides services to, and purchasepurchases products from, ourits other joint ventures which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Refer to the below table for a summary of the sales and purchases with the Company and its joint ventures which are recorded under the equity method of accounting. Theseaccounting:
 SuccessorPredecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2020July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2018
(in millions)
Sales to joint ventures(1)(2)
$$$$
Purchases from joint ventures(2)
(1)Sales to joint ventures includes sales were $17to the Russia JV of $1 million, $1 million, $1 million, and $7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Accounts receivable from these joint ventures were $6 million at2020, the Successor period July 2, 2019 through December 31, 2017. These purchases were $14 million for2019, the Predecessor period January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2017. We had accounts payable2018 and is included in the Held for Sale Business.
(2)There were no sales to these joint ventures or purchases from joint ventures for the Predecessor period July 1, 2019.
(in millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Accounts receivable from joint ventures(1)
$ <1$
Accounts payable to joint ventures— <1
(1)    Accounts receivable from joint ventures is mostly comprised of receivables from the Russia JV included in the Held for Sale Business. Accounts receivable from the Company’s other joint ventures was less than $1 million atfor both December 31, 2017.2020 and 2019.
WeIn addition to the accounts receivable from joint ventures disclosed above, the Company had a loan receivable of $6$4 millionand royalties receivable of $1$7 million from our unconsolidated forest products joint venture in Russia as of December 31, 2017.2020 and 2019, respectively, from the Russia JV. This loan receivable has been included in “Long-term assets held for sale” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Director Independence
We and Hexion Holdings have no securities listed for trading on a national securities exchange or in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association which has requirements that a majority of our Board of Directors or Board of Managers be independent. However, for purposes of complying with the disclosure requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we and Hexion Holdings have adopted the definition of independence used by the New York Stock Exchange. Under the New York Stock Exchange’s definition of independence, Messrs. JoyceBartels, Benjamin, Chapman, Delgado, Shannon, Wulff, Newlin and MannaMs. Eicher are independent.



Hexion Inc. | 154 | 2020 Form 10-K

ITEM 14 - PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) is the Company’s principal accounting firm. The following table sets forth the fees billed by PwC to the Company in 20172020 and 20162019 (in millions):
 PwC
 20202019
Audit fees (1)
$4.2 $7.0 
Audit-related fees (2)
0.2 0.2 
Tax fees (3)
0.6 1.5 
Other fees (4)
1.4 0.1 
Total$6.4 $8.8 
  PwC
  2017 2016
Audit fees (1)
 $4.3
 $4.7
Audit-related fees (2)
 2.4
 2.5
Tax fees (3)
 0.7
 0.4
Other fees (4)
 1.1
 0.8
Total $8.5
 $8.4
(1)Audit Fees: This category includes fees and expenses billed by PwC for the audits of the Company’s financial statements and for the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. This category includes audit fees and expenses for engagements performed at U.S. and international locations.
(1)
Audit Fees: This category includes fees and expenses billed by PwC for the audits of the Company’s financial statements and for the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. This category includes audit fees and expenses for engagements performed at U.S. and international locations, including stand-alone audits of Hexion International Holdings Cooperatief U.A. for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
(2)Audit-Related Fees: This category includes fees and expenses billed by PwC for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements. This category includes fees for the reviews of SEC registration statements and other SEC reporting services as well as audit fees for other stand-alone financial statements of certain entities of the registrant.
(3)Tax Fees: This category includes fees and expenses billed by PwC for domestic and international tax compliance, planning services, tax advice and assistance with bankruptcy.
(4)Other Fees: This category includes other fees billed for non-recurring work, related to transactions, due diligence or other one-time services.
(2)
Audit-Related Fees: This category includes fees and expenses billed by PwC for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements. This category includes fees for the reviews of SEC registration statements and other SEC reporting services as well as audit fees for other stand-alone financial statements of certain entities of the registrant.
(3)
Tax Fees: This category includes fees and expenses billed by PwC for domestic and international tax compliance and planning services and tax advice.
(4)
Other Fees: This category includes other fees billed for non-recurring work, related to transactions, due diligence or other one-time services.
Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures
Under a policy adopted by the Audit Committee, all audit and non-audit services provided by our principal accounting firms must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or a member designated by the Audit Committee. All services pre-approved by the designated member are reported to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The pre-approval of audit and non-audit services may be made at any time up to a year before the commencement of the specified service. Under the policy, the Company is prohibited from using its principal accounting firms for certain non-audit services, the list of which is based upon the list of prohibited activities in the SEC’s rules and regulations. Pursuant to the pre-approval provisions set forth above, the Audit Committee approved all services related to the Audit Fees described in (1) above.

Hexion Inc. | 155 | 2020 Form 10-K

PART IV
ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
(1)
Consolidated Financial Statements – The financial statements and related notes of Hexion Inc., and the reports of independent registered public accounting firms are included at Item 8 of this report.
(1)Consolidated Financial Statements – The financial statements and related notes of Hexion Inc., and the reports of independent registered public accounting firms are included at Item 8 of this report.
(2)Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves. All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because that required information is shown in either the Consolidated Financial Statements or in the notes thereto.
(3)Exhibits Required by SEC Regulation S-K – The following Exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference:
(2)
Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves. Also included are the financial statements and related notes of Hexion International Holdings Cooperatief U.A., as its securities collateralize the Company’s securities that have been registered, as defined by Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933, and the reports of independent registered public accounting firms. All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because that required information is shown in either the Consolidated Financial Statements or in the notes thereto.
(3)
Exhibits Required by SEC Regulation S-K – The following Exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference:
  
 
  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibitFiling
Date
Filed
Herewith
2.1†S-1/A333-1242872.17/15/2005 
2.2†SOC Resins Master Sale Agreement dated July 10, 2000 among Shell Oil Company, Resin Acquisition, LLC and Shell Epoxy Resins Inc.S-4333-571702.13/16/2001 
2.3†SPNV Resins Sale Agreement dated as of September 11, 2000 between Shell Petroleum N.V. and Shell Epoxy Resins Inc.S-4333-571702.23/16/2001 
2.4Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated November 13, 2000 between Shell Epoxy Resins Inc. and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-571702.33/16/2001 
2.5Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated November 14, 2000 between Resin Acquisition, LLC and RPP Holdings LLCS-4333-571702.43/16/2001 
3.110-K001-000713.13/10/2015
3.210-K001-000713.23/10/2015
4.1Form of Indenture between Borden, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, dated as of December 15, 1987, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 15, 1987, the Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993 and the Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 26, 1996, related to the $200,000,000 9.20% Debentures due 2021 and $750,000,000 7.875% Debentures due 2023S-333-457704(a)
thru 4(d)
  
4.28-K001-000714.12/4/2010 
4.38-K001-000714.22/4/2010 
4.48-K001-000714.16/9/2010
4.58-K001-000714.11/18/2013
4.68-K001-000714.212/5/2014
4.78-K001-000714.111/12/2010
4.88-K001-000714.312/2/2014
4.910-Q001-000714.511/13/2018
4.108-K001-000714.13/20/2012
Hexion Inc. | 156 | 2020 Form 10-K

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibit
Filing
Date
Filed
Herewith
2.1†S-1/A333-1242872.17/15/2005 
2.2†SOC Resins Master Sale Agreement dated July 10, 2000 among Shell Oil Company, Resin Acquisition, LLC and Shell Epoxy Resins Inc.S-4333-571702.13/16/2001 
2.3†SPNV Resins Sale Agreement dated as of September 11, 2000 between Shell Petroleum N.V. and Shell Epoxy Resins Inc.S-4333-571702.23/16/2001 
2.4Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated November 13, 2000 between Shell Epoxy Resins Inc. and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-571702.33/16/2001 
2.5Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated November 14, 2000 between Resin Acquisition, LLC and RPP Holdings LLCS-4333-571702.43/16/2001 
3.110-K001-000713.13/10/2015 
3.210-K001-000713.23/10/2015 
4.1Form of Indenture between Borden, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, dated as of December 15, 1987, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 15, 1987, the Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993 and the Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 26, 1996, related to the $200,000,000 9.20% Debentures due 2021 and $750,000,000 7.875% Debentures due 2023S-333-45770
4(a)
thru 4(d)
  
4.28-K001-000714.12/4/2010 
4.38-K001-000714.22/4/2010 
4.48-K001-000714.16/9/2010 
4.58-K001-000714.111/12/2010 
4.68-K001-000714.13/20/2012 
4.78-K001-000714.11/18/2013 
4.88-K001-000714.12/6/2013 

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibitFiling
Date
Filed
Herewith
4.118-K001-000714.12/6/2013
4.128-K001-000714.14/3/2013
4.138-K001-000714.112/2/2014
4.1410-Q001-000714.111/13/2018
4.158-K001-000714.14/15/2015
4.1610-Q001-000714.211/13/2018
4.178-K001-000714.12/10/2017
4.188-K001-000714.22/10/2017
4.198-K001-000714.15/12/2017
4.2010-Q001-000714.311/13/2018
4.218-K001-000714.32/10/2017
4.2210-Q001-000714.411/13/2018
4.238-K001-000714.17/2/2019
4.248-K001-000714.14/1/2019
4.2510-K001-000714.244/11/2019
10.1‡10-Q001-0007110(iv)11/15/2004 
10.2‡10-Q001-0007110(v)11/15/2004 
10.3‡Resolution Performance Products Inc. 2000 Stock Option PlanS-4333-5717010.263/16/2001 
10.4‡Resolution Performance Products Inc. 2000 Non - Employee Directors Stock Option PlanS-4333-5717010.273/16/2001 
10.5‡S-1/A333-12428710.349/19/2005 
10.6‡S-4333-12282610.122/14/2005
10.7‡S-1/A333-12428710.527/15/2005
10.8‡S-1/A333-12428710.537/15/2005
10.9‡S-1/A333-12428710.547/15/2005 
Hexion Inc. | 157 | 2020 Form 10-K

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibit
Filing
Date
Filed
Herewith
4.98-K001-000714.14/3/2013 
4.108-K001-000714.112/2/2014 
4.118-K001-000714.212/2/2014 
4.128-K001-000714.312/2/2014 
4.13

8-K001-000714.14/15/2015 
4.14

8-K001-000714.12/10/2017 
4.15

8-K001-000714.22/10/2017 
4.16

8-K001-000714.32/10/2017 
4.17

8-K001-000714.15/12/2017 
10.1‡10-Q001-0007110(iv)11/15/2004 
10.2‡10-Q001-0007110(v)11/15/2004 
10.3‡Resolution Performance Products Inc. 2000 Stock Option PlanS-4333-5717010.263/16/2001 
10.4‡Resolution Performance Products Inc. 2000 Non - Employee Directors Stock Option PlanS-4333-5717010.273/16/2001 
10.5‡S-1/A333-12428710.349/19/2005 
10.6‡S-4333-12282610.122/14/2005 
10.7‡S-1/A333-12428710.527/15/2005 
10.8‡S-1/A333-12428710.537/15/2005 
10.9‡S-1/A333-12428710.547/15/2005 
10.10‡S-1/A333-12428710.557/15/2005 
10.11‡10-Q001-0007110.18/14/2007 
10.12S-1/A333-12428710.637/15/2005 
10.13S-1/A333-12428710.647/15/2005 
10.14‡8-K001-00071109/12/2005 
10.15‡10-Q001-0007110(i)11/15/2004 
10.16‡10-Q001-0007110(ii)11/15/2004 

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibitFiling
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.10‡S-1/A333-12428710.557/15/2005 
10.11‡10-Q001-0007110.18/14/2007 
10.12S-1/A333-12428710.637/15/2005 
10.13S-1/A333-12428710.647/15/2005 
10.14‡8-K001-00071109/12/2005 
10.15‡10-Q001-0007110(ii)11/15/2004 
10.16‡10-K001-0007110.233/9/2010
10.17‡8-K001-0007199.11/6/2012
10.18Master Asset Conveyance and Facility Support Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2002, between Borden Chemical and Borden Chemicals and Plastics Operating Limited Partnership10-K001-00071(10)(xxvi)3/28/2003 
10.19Environmental Servitude Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2002, between Borden Chemical and Borden Chemicals and Plastics Operating Limited Partnership10-K001-00071(10)(xxvii)3/28/2003 
10.20Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement and Contribution Agreement dated as of November 14, 2000 between Shell Oil Company and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-5717010.133/16/2001 
10.21Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement and Contribution Agreement dated as of November 14, 2000 between Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. and Shell Epoxy Resins Research B.VS-4333-57170101403/16/2001 
10.22First Amended and Restated Deer Park Site Services, Utilities, Materials and Facilities Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Shell Chemical Company, for itself and as agent for Shell Oil Company, and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-57170101903/16/2001 
10.23First Amended and Restated Pernis Site Services, Utilities, Materials and Facilities Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Resolution Europe B.V. (f/k/a Resolution Nederland B.V., f/k/a Shell Epoxy Resins Nederland B.V.) and Shell Nederland Raffinaderij B.V.S-4333-57170102103/16/2001 
10.24First Amended and Restated Pernis Site Services, Utilities, Materials and Facilities Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Resolution Europe B.V. (f/k/a Resolution Nederland B.V., f/k/a Shell Epoxy Resins Nederland B.V.) and Shell Nederland Chemie B.V.S-4333-57170102203/16/2001 
10.25†10-K001-00071104503/22/2007 
10.26Deer Park Ground Lease and Grant of Easements dated as of November 1, 2000 between Shell Oil Company and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-57170102303/16/2001 
10.27Norco Ground Lease and Grant of Servitudes dated as of November 1, 2000 between Shell Oil Company and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-57170102403/16/2001 
10.28Amended and Restated Agreement of Sub-Lease (Pernis) dated as of November 1, 2000 between Resolution Europe B.V. (f/k/a Resolution Nederland B.V., f/k/a Shell Epoxy Resins Nederland B.V.) and Shell Nederland Raffinaderij B.V.S-4333-57170102503/16/2001 
10.29S-1/A333-124287106607/15/2005 
10.3010-K001-00071105703/11/2009 
10.3110-Q001-00071104008/13/2009 
10.328-K001-00071105006/9/2010
10.338-K001-000711020011/12/2010
Hexion Inc. | 158 | 2020 Form 10-K

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibit
Filing
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.17‡10-K001-0007110.233/9/2010 
10.18‡10-K001-0007110.293/9/2010 
10.19‡8-K001-0007199.11/6/2012 
10.20Master Asset Conveyance and Facility Support Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2002, between Borden Chemical and Borden Chemicals and Plastics Operating Limited Partnership10-K001-00071(10)(xxvi)3/28/2003 
10.21Environmental Servitude Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2002, between Borden Chemical and Borden Chemicals and Plastics Operating Limited Partnership10-K001-00071(10)(xxvii)3/28/2003 
10.22Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement and Contribution Agreement dated as of November 14, 2000 between Shell Oil Company and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-5717010.133/16/2001 
10.23Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement and Contribution Agreement dated as of November 14, 2000 between Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. and Shell Epoxy Resins Research B.VS-4333-5717010.143/16/2001 
10.24First Amended and Restated Deer Park Site Services, Utilities, Materials and Facilities Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Shell Chemical Company, for itself and as agent for Shell Oil Company, and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-5717010.193/16/2001 
10.25First Amended and Restated Pernis Site Services, Utilities, Materials and Facilities Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Resolution Europe B.V. (f/k/a Resolution Nederland B.V., f/k/a Shell Epoxy Resins Nederland B.V.) and Shell Nederland Raffinaderij B.V.S-4333-5717010.213/16/2001 
10.26First Amended and Restated Pernis Site Services, Utilities, Materials and Facilities Agreement dated November 1, 2000 between Resolution Europe B.V. (f/k/a Resolution Nederland B.V., f/k/a Shell Epoxy Resins Nederland B.V.) and Shell Nederland Chemie B.V.S-4333-5717010.223/16/2001 
10.27†10-K001-0007110.453/22/2007 
10.28Deer Park Ground Lease and Grant of Easements dated as of November 1, 2000 between Shell Oil Company and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-5717010.233/16/2001 
10.29Norco Ground Lease and Grant of Servitudes dated as of November 1, 2000 between Shell Oil Company and Shell Epoxy Resins LLCS-4333-5717010.243/16/2001 
10.30Amended and Restated Agreement of Sub-Lease (Pernis) dated as of November 1, 2000 between Resolution Europe B.V. (f/k/a Resolution Nederland B.V., f/k/a Shell Epoxy Resins Nederland B.V.) and Shell Nederland Raffinaderij B.V.S-4333-5717010.253/16/2001 
10.31S-1/A333-12428710.667/15/2005 
10.3210-K001-0007110.573/11/2009 
10.3310-Q001-0007110.48/13/2009 
10.348-K001-0007110.56/9/2010 
10.358-K001-0007110.211/12/2010 
10.36‡S-4333-17294310.703/18/2011 
10.37‡S-4333-17294310.713/18/2011 
10.38‡S-4333-17294310.723/18/2011 

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibitFiling
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.34‡S-4333-17294310.703/18/2011
10.35‡S-4333-17294310.713/18/2011
10.36‡S-4333-17294310.723/18/2011
10.37‡S-4333-17294310.733/18/2011
10.388-K001-0007110.23/17/2011
10.398-K001-0007110.53/20/2012
10.40‡10-Q001-0007110.111/13/2012
10.41‡10-Q001-0007110.211/13/2012
10.428-K001-0007110.21/18/2013
10.438-K001-0007110.12/6/2013
10.448-K001-0007110.22/6/2013
10.458-K001-0007110.13/6/2013
10.468-K001-0007110.23/6/2013
10.478-K001-0007110.33/6/2013
10.48‡10-K001-0007110.924/1/2013
10.49‡10-K001-0007110.934/1/2013
10.508-K001-0007110.24/3/2013
10.518-K001-0007110.34/3/2013
10.528-K001-0007110.44/3/2013
Hexion Inc. | 159 | 2020 Form 10-K

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibit
Filing
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.39‡S-4333-17294310.733/18/2011 
10.408-K001-0007110.23/17/2011 
10.418-K001-0007110.53/20/2012 
10.42‡10-Q001-0007110.111/13/2012 
10.43‡10-Q001-0007110.211/13/2012 
10.448-K001-0007110.21/18/2013 
10.458-K001-0007110.12/6/2013 
10.468-K001-0007110.22/6/2013 
10.478-K001-0007110.13/6/2013 
10.488-K001-0007110.23/6/2013 
10.498-K001-0007110.33/6/2013 
10.50‡10-K001-0007110.924/1/2013 
10.51‡10-K001-0007110.934/1/2013 
10.528-K001-0007110.24/3/2013 
10.53‡8-K001-0007110.34/3/2013 
10.548-K001-0007110.44/3/2013 
10.558-K001-0007110.64/3/2013 

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibitFiling
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.538-K001-0007110.64/3/2013
10.54‡10-K001-0007110.873/31/2014
10.55‡8-K001-0007110.110/30/2014
10.56‡10-Q001-0007110.111/10/2014
10.57‡10-Q001-0007110.211/10/2014
10.58‡10-K001-0007110.823/10/2015
10.598-K001-0007110.14/15/2015
10.608-K001-0007110.24/15/2015
10.618-K001-0007110.34/15/2015
10.628-K001-0007110.44/15/2015
10.638-K001-0007110.54/15/2015
10.64‡10-Q001-0007110.15/13/2015
10.65‡10-Q001-0007110.18/12/2015
10.6610-Q001-0007110.28/12/2015
10.67‡10-K001-0007110.793/14/2016
10.6810-K001-0007110.803/14/2016
10.69‡8-K001-0007110.25/6/2016
10.70‡10-Q001-0007110.111/14/2016
10.718-K001-0007110.112/23/2016
10.72‡10-K001-0007110.763/8/2017
10.7310-K001-0007110.773/8/2017
Hexion Inc. | 160 | 2020 Form 10-K

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibit
Filing
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.56‡10-K001-0007110.873/31/2014 
10.57‡8-K001-0007110.110/30/2014 
10.58‡10-Q001-0007110.111/10/2014 
10.59‡10-Q001-0007110.211/10/2014 
10.60‡10-K001-0007110.823/10/2015 
10.61

8-K001-0007110.14/15/2015 
10.62

8-K001-0007110.24/15/2015 
10.63

8-K001-0007110.34/15/2015 
10.64

8-K001-0007110.44/15/2015 
10.658-K001-0007110.54/15/2015 
10.66‡10-Q001-0007110.15/13/2015 
10.67‡10-Q001-0007110.18/12/2015 
10.68

10-Q001-0007110.28/12/2015 
10.69‡10-K001-0007110.793/14/2016 
10.7010-K001-0007110.803/14/2016 
10.71‡8-K001-0007110.25/6/2016 
10.72‡10-Q001-0007110.111/14/2016 
10.73

8-K001-0007110.112/23/2016 
10.74‡

10-K001-0007110.753/8/2017 
10.75‡10-K001-0007110.763/8/2017 
10.76

10-K001-0007110.773/8/2017 

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibitFiling
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.748-K001-0007110.12/10/2017
10.758-K001-0007110.22/10/2017
10.768-K001-0007110.32/10/2017
10.778-K001-0007110.42/10/2017
10.788-K001-0007110.52/10/2017
10.798-K001-0007110.62/10/2017
10.8010-K001-0007110.843/8/2017
10.81‡10-Q001-0007110.35/5/2017
10.828-K001-0007110.15/12/2017
10.838-K001-0007110.25/12/2017
10.84‡10-Q001-0007110.28/11/2017
10.85‡10-Q001-0007110.38/11/2017
Hexion Inc. | 161 | 2020 Form 10-K

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibit
Filing
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.77

8-K001-0007110.12/10/2017 
10.78

8-K001-0007110.22/10/2017 
10.79

8-K001-0007110.32/10/2017 
10.80

8-K001-0007110.42/10/2017 
10.81

8-K001-0007110.52/10/2017 
10.82

8-K001-0007110.62/10/2017 
10.8310-K001-0007110.843/8/2017 
10.8410-Q001-0007110.35/5/2017 
10.85

8-K001-0007110.15/12/2017 
10.86

8-K001-0007110.25/12/2017 
10.87‡10-Q001-0007110.18/11/2017 

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibitFiling
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.8610-K001-0007110.903/2/2018
10.87‡10-Q001-0007110.15/14/2018
10.8810-Q001-0007110.25/14/2018
10.8910-Q001-0007110.35/14/2018
10.9010-Q001-0007110.45/14/2018
10.9110-Q001-0007110.55/14/2018
10.9210-Q001-0007110.65/14/2018
10.9310-Q001-0007110.75/14/2018
10.9410-Q001-0007110.85/14/2018
10.9510-Q001-0007110.95/14/2018
10.968-K001-0007110.14/1/2019
10.978-K001-0007110.14/8/2019
10.98

8-K001-0007110.24/8/2019
10.998-K001-0007110.34/8/2019
10.1008-K001-0007110.44/8/2019
10.10110-K001-0007110.1014/11/2019
10.102
10-K001-0007110.1024/11/2019
10.103
10-K001-0007110.1034/11/2019
10.1048-K001-0007110.17/2/2019
10.1058-K001-0007110.27/2/2019
Hexion Inc. | 162 | 2020 Form 10-K

  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibit
Filing
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.88‡

10-Q001-0007110.28/11/2017 
10.89‡10-Q001-0007110.38/11/2017 
10.90    X
12.1    X
18.110-Q001-0007118.15/13/2015 
21.1    X
31.1Rule 13a-14 Certifications:     
     X
     X
32.1    X
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document    X
101.SCH*XBRL Schema Document    X
101.CAL*XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document    X
101.LAB*XBRL Label Linkbase Document    X
101.PRE*XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document    X
101.DEF*XBRL Definition Linkbase Document    X
The schedules and exhibits to these agreements are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish supplementally to the SEC, upon request, a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.
Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
*Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). The financial information in the XBRL-related documents is “unaudited” or “unreviewed.”
  Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile NumberExhibitFiling
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.1068-K001-0007110.37/2/2019
10.107‡10-K001-0007110.1073/3/2020
10.108‡10-Q001-0007110.25/14/2020
10.109‡10-Q001-0007110.35/14/2020
10.110‡10-KX
18.110-Q001-0007118.15/13/2015
21.1X
31.1Rule 13a-14 Certifications:    
     X
     X
32.1    X
101.INS*XBRL Instance DocumentX
101.SCH*XBRL Schema DocumentX
101.CAL*XBRL Calculation Linkbase DocumentX
101.LAB*XBRL Label Linkbase DocumentX
101.PRE*XBRL Presentation Linkbase DocumentX
101.DEF*XBRL Definition Linkbase DocumentX

†    The schedules and exhibits to these agreements are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish supplementally to the SEC, upon request, a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.
‡    Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
*    Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). The financial information in the XBRL-related documents is “unaudited” or “unreviewed.”
Hexion Inc. | 163 | 2020 Form 10-K


ITEM 16 - FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.

Hexion Inc. | 164 | 2020 Form 10-K

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
HEXION INC.
HEXION INC.
By:
By:/s/ George F. Knight
George F. Knight
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 2, 201810, 2021
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
NameTitleSignatureDate
Craig A. RogersonDirector, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director, Hexion Holdings Corporation/s/ Craig A. RogersonMarch 10, 2021
George F. KnightDirector, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ George F. KnightMarch 10, 2021
NameTitleSignatureDate
Craig A. Rogerson
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and Manager, Hexion Holdings LLC
/s/ Craig A. RogersonMarch 2, 2018
George F. Knight
Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) and Manager, Hexion Holdings LLC
/s/ George F. KnightMarch 2, 2018
Colette B. BarricksSenior Vice President and General Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)/s/ Colette B. BarricksMarch 2, 201810, 2021
Samuel FeinsteinManager, Hexion Holdings LLC/s/ Samuel FeinsteinMarch 2, 2018
William H. JoyceManager, Hexion Holdings LLC/s/ William H. JoyceMarch 2, 2018
Robert Kalsow-RamosManager, Hexion Holdings LLC/s/ Robert Kalsow-RamosMarch 2, 2018
Scott M. KleinmanManager, Hexion Holdings LLC/s/ Scott M. KleinmanMarch 2, 2018
Geoffrey A. MannaManager, Hexion Holdings LLC/s/ Geoffrey A. MannaMarch 2, 2018
Jonathan D. RichManager, Hexion Holdings LLC/s/ Jonathan D. RichMarch 2, 2018
Marvin O. SchlangerManager, Hexion Holdings LLC/s/ Marvin O. SchlangerMarch 2, 2018

HEXION INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIEF U.A.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions) December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Assets    
Current assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $18 and $17, respectively) (see Note 2) $56
 $113
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8 and $11, respectively) 246
 208
Accounts receivable from affiliates (see Note 4) 90
 87
Loans receivable from affiliates (see Note 9) 4
 173
Inventories:    
Finished and in-process goods 113
 100
Raw materials and supplies 54
 54
Current assets held for sale (see Note 13) 5
 
Other current assets 24
 18
Total current assets 592
 753
Long-term loans receivable from affiliates (see Note 9) 208
 1
Investments in unconsolidated entities 11
 10
Long-term assets held for sale (see Note 13) 2
 
Other long-term assets 34
 36
Property and equipment    
Land 38
 34
Buildings 145
 127
Machinery and equipment 1,238
 1,064
  1,421
 1,225
Less accumulated depreciation (912) (785)
  509
 440
Goodwill (see Note 5) 108
 98
Other intangible assets, net (see Note 5) 25
 27
Total assets $1,489
 $1,365
Liabilities and Deficit    
Current liabilities:    
Accounts payable $226
 $192
Accounts payable to affiliates (see Note 4) 104
 79
Debt payable within one year (see Note 8) 86
 79
Affiliated debt payable within one year (see Note 9) 31
 46
Income taxes payable 5
 5
Accrued payroll and incentive compensation 24
 26
Other current liabilities 62
 48
Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale (see Note 13) 2
 
Total current liabilities 540
 475
Long-term liabilities:    
Long-term debt (see Note 8) 76
 18
Affiliated long-term debt (see Note 9) 1,096
 1,039
Deferred income taxes (see Note 17) 7
 9
Long-term pension and postretirement benefit obligations (see Note 11) 230
 204
Other long-term liabilities 79
 68
Total liabilities 2,028
 1,813
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 8 and 10)    
Deficit    
Paid-in capital 25
 179
Loans receivable from parent 
 (179)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (59) (86)
Accumulated deficit (504) (361)
Total Hexion International Cooperatief U.A. shareholders’ deficit (538) (447)
Noncontrolling interest (1) (1)
Total deficit (539) (448)
Total liabilities and deficit $1,489
 $1,365

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

HEXION INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIEF U.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
  Year ended December 31,
(In millions) 2017 2016 2015
Net sales $2,011
 $1,948
 $2,344
Cost of sales 1,736
 1,652
 1,956
Gross profit 275
 296
 388
Selling, general and administrative expense 175
 185
 179
Asset impairments (see Note 2) 
 
 6
Business realignment costs (see Note 3) 28
 15
 9
Gain on dispositions (see Note 12) 
 (28) 
Other operating expense (income), net 15
 (3) (7)
Operating income 57
 127
 201
Interest expense, net 13
 10
 8
Affiliated interest expense, net (see Note 9) 75
 72
 79
Other non-operating expense (income), net (see Note 4) 97
 (28) (98)
(Loss) income before income taxes and earnings from unconsolidated entities (128) 73
 212
Income tax expense (see Note 17) 16
 31
 27
(Loss) income before earnings from unconsolidated entities (144) 42
 185
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes 1
 1
 1
Net (loss) income (143) 43
 186
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest 
 
 (1)
Net (loss) income attributable to Hexion International Cooperatief U.A. $(143) $43
 $185
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

HEXION INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIEF U.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

 Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017 2016 2015
Net (loss) income$(143) $43
 $186
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Foreign currency translation adjustments29
 (24) (45)
Loss recognized from pension and postretirement benefits(2) (1) (1)
Other comprehensive income (loss)27
 (25) (46)
Comprehensive (loss) income(116) 18
 140
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 (1)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Hexion International Cooperatief U.A.$(116) $18
 $139
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

HEXION INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIEF U.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
  Year Ended December 31,
(In millions) 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows provided by operating activities      
Net (loss) income $(143) $43
 $186
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 52
 62
 63
Non-cash asset impairments and accelerated depreciation 
 
 7
Deferred tax expense 1
 2
 8
Gain on disposition (see Note 12) 
 (28) 
Loss on sale of assets 1
 
 
Amortization of deferred financing fees 2
 
 
Gain on step acquisition (see Note 14) 
 
 (5)
Unrealized foreign currency loss (gain) 38
 (54) 10
Unrealized losses (gains) on pension and postretirement benefit plan liabilities 3
 33
 (13)
Allocations of corporate overhead, net (see Note 4) 4
 5
 6
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange guarantee agreement with parent (see Note 4) 86
 (18) (93)
Loss on cash pooling guarantee agreement with parent (Note 4) 
 2
 1
Other non-cash adjustments (1) 1
 (10)
Net change in assets and liabilities:      
Accounts receivable (13) 29
 (11)
Inventories 1
 (24) 35
Accounts payable (48) 12
 14
Income taxes payable 4
 18
 4
Other assets, current and non-current (14) (21) 14
Other liabilities, current and non-current 32
 100
 8
Net cash provided by operating activities 5
 162
 224
Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities      
Capital expenditures (77) (72) (81)
Capitalized interest (1) 
 (1)
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired 
 
 (7)
Proceeds from disposition, net 
 107
 
Proceeds from the sale of assets 3
 4
 13
Change in restricted cash 1
 (9) (3)
Proceeds from sale of investments, net

 
 
 6
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (74) 30
 (73)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities      
Net short-term debt borrowings (repayments) 11
 (36) 9
Borrowings of long-term debt 373
 283
 21
Repayments of long-term debt (328) (254) (39)
Affiliated loan repayments, net (47) (215) (127)
Capital contribution from parent 
 13
 26
Deferred financing fees paid (2) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 7
 (209) (110)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 4
 (2) (9)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (58) (19) 32
Cash and cash equivalents (unrestricted) at beginning of year 96
 115
 83
Cash and cash equivalents (unrestricted) at end of year $38
 $96
 $115
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information      
Cash paid for:      
Interest, net $89
 $83
 $85
Income taxes, net of cash refunds 9
 15
 13
Non-cash investing activity:      
Non-cash assumption of debt on step acquisition (see Note 14) $
 $
 $18
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

HEXION INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIEF U.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF DEFICIT
(In millions) Paid-in Capital Loans Receivable from Parent Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated Deficit Total Hexion International Cooperatief U.A. Shareholders’ Deficit Noncontrolling Interest Total
Balance at December 31, 2014 $128
 $(1) $(15) $(591) $(479) $(2) $(481)
Net income 
 
 
 185
 185
 1
 186
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 (46) 
 (46) 
 (46)
Non-cash changes in principal and translation adjustment 
 (85) 
 
 (85) 
 (85)
Capital contribution from parent 30
 
 
 
 30
 
 30
Allocations of corporate overhead (see Note 4) 6
 
 
 
 6
 
 6
Balance at December 31, 2015 164
 (86) (61) (406) (389) (1) (390)
Net income 
 
 
 43
 43
 
 43
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 (25) 
 (25) 
 (25)
Non-cash changes in principal and translation adjustment 
 (93) 
 
 (93) 
 (93)
Capital contribution from parent 13
 
 
 
 13
 
 13
Deconsolidation of subsidiary (3)     2
 (1)   (1)
Allocations of corporate overhead (see Note 4) 5
 
 
 
 5
 
 5
Balance at December 31, 2016 179
 (179) (86) (361) (447) (1) (448)
Net loss 
 
 
 (143) (143) 
 (143)
Other comprehensive income 
 
 27
 
 27
 
 27
Non-cash changes in principal and translation adjustment 
 6
 
 
 6
 
 6
Reclassification of affiliated loan receivable 
 173
 
 
 173
 
 173
Non-cash return of capital to parent (158) 
 
 
 (158) 
 (158)
Allocations of corporate overhead (see Note 4) 4
 
 
 
 4
 
 4
Balance at December 31, 2017 $25

$

$(59)
$(504)
$(538)
$(1)
$(539)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

HEXION INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIEF U.A.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In millions)
1. Background and Basis of Presentation
Hexion International Cooperatief U.A. (“CO-OP”) is a holding company whose primary assets are its investments in Hexion Holding B.V. and Hexion Canada, Inc. (“Hexion Canada”), and their respective subsidiaries. Due to an internal reorganization within the Hexion group in 2017, the membership interests in Hexion International Holdings Coöperatief U.A. (“Old CO-OP”) were contributed to CO-OP.  In connection with these transactions, the pledge of Old CO-OP’s membership interest was released under the existing collateral documents and the membership interests of CO-OP have been pledged as collateral under the applicable collateral documents.
Together, CO-OP, through its investments in Hexion Canada and Hexion Holding B.V. and their respective subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”), is engaged in the manufacture and marketing of urea, phenolic, epoxy and epoxy specialty resins and coatings applications primarily used in forest and industrial and construction products and other specialty and industrial chemicals worldwide. At December 31, 2017, the Company’s operations included 32 manufacturing facilities in Europe, North America, South America, Australia, New Zealand, China and Korea.
The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hexion Inc. (“Hexion”), which, through a series of intermediate holding companies, is controlled by investment funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Management Holdings, L.P. (together with Apollo Global Management, LLC and its subsidiaries, “Apollo”). The Company has significant related party transactions with Hexion, as discussed in Note 4. CO-OP operates as a business under the direction and with support of its parent, Hexion. All entities are under the common control of Hexion.
Hexion serves global industrial markets through a broad range of thermoset technologies, specialty products and technical support for customers in a diverse range of applications and industries.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation—The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries, all of which are under the common control and management of Hexion, and for which no substantive participating rights are held by minority shareholders. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Noncontrolling interests exist for the equity interests in subsidiaries that are not 100% owned by the Company.
Foreign Currency Translations and Transactions—Assets and liabilities of foreign affiliates are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income, expenses and cash flows are translated at average exchange rates during the year. The Company recognized transaction losses of $21, gains of $19 and losses of $2 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are included as a component of “Net (loss) income.” In addition, gains or losses related to the Company’s intercompany loans payable and receivable denominated in a foreign currency other than the subsidiary’s functional currency that are deemed to be permanently invested are remeasured to cumulative translation and recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The effect of translation is included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.”
Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and also the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. In addition, it requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates that are included in the financial statements are environmental remediation liabilities, legal liabilities, deferred tax assets and liabilities and related valuation allowances, income tax accruals, pension and postretirement assets and liabilities, valuation allowances for accounts receivable and inventories, general insurance liabilities, asset impairments and fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business acquisitions. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents—The Company considers all highly liquid investments that are purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had interest-bearing time deposits and other cash equivalent investments of $9 and $7, respectively. These amounts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of “Cash and cash equivalents.”
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated using factors such as customer credit ratings and past collection history. Receivables are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is probable that the receivable will not be collected.
Inventories—Inventories are stated at lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in, first-out method. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable manufacturing overheads, which are based on normal production capacity. Abnormal manufacturing costs are recognized as period costs and fixed manufacturing overheads are allocated based on normal production capacity. An allowance is provided for excess and obsolete inventories based on management’s review of inventories on-hand compared to estimated future usage and sales. Inventories in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are presented net of an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory of $4 and $3 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Deferred Expenses—Deferred debt financing costs are included in “Long-term debt” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the exception of deferred financing costs related to revolving line of credit arrangements, which are included in “Other long-term assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These costs are amortized over the life of the related debt or credit facility using the effective interest method. Upon extinguishment of any debt, the related debt issuance costs are written off. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s unamortized deferred financing costs included in “Other long-term assets” were $4 and $3, respectively.
Property and Equipment—Land, buildings and machinery and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of properties (the average estimated useful lives for buildings and machinery and equipment are 20 years and 15 years, respectively). Assets under capital leases are amortized over the lesser of their useful life or the lease term. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs, minor renewals and turnarounds (periodic maintenance and repairs to major units of manufacturing facilities) are expensed as incurred. When property and equipment is retired or disposed of, the asset and related depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in operating income. The Company capitalizes interest costs that are incurred during the construction of property and equipment. Depreciation expense was $46, $54 and $54 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Capitalized Software—The Company capitalizes certain costs, such as software coding, installation and testing, that are incurred to purchase or create and implement computer software for internal use. Amortization is recorded on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives, which range from 1 to 5 years.
Goodwill and Intangibles—The excess of purchase price over net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired is carried as “Goodwill” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Separately identifiable intangible assets that are used in the operations of the business (e.g., patents and technology, tradenames, customer lists and contracts) are recorded at cost (fair value at the time of acquisition) and reported as “Other intangible assets, net” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Costs to renew or extend the term of identifiable intangible assets are expensed as incurred. The Company does not amortize goodwill. Intangible assets with determinable lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the legal or useful life of the assets, which range from 1 to 30 years (see Note 5).
Impairment—The Company reviews property and equipment and all amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability is based on estimated undiscounted cash flows or other relevant observable measures. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment may exist, by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value to determine if there is an indication that a potential impairment may exist.
Long-Lived Assets and Amortizable Intangible Assets
There were no long-lived asset impairments recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded long-lived asset impairments of $6, which are included in “Asset impairments” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 6).
Goodwill
The Company performs an annual assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of any events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets. If, after assessing all events and circumstances, the Company determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets, the Company uses a probability weighted market and income approach to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company’s market approach is a comparable analysis technique commonly used in the investment banking and private equity industries based on the EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiple technique. Under this technique, estimated fair value is the result of a market-based EBITDA multiple that is applied to an appropriate historical EBITDA amount, adjusted for the additional fair value that would be assigned by a market participant obtaining control over the reporting unit. The Company’s income approach is a discounted cash flow model. When the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill is greater than the estimated fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference.
At October 1, 2017 and 2016, the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting unit was deemed to be substantially in excess of the carrying amount of assets (including goodwill) and liabilities assigned to the reporting unit.
Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale - The assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 related to the proposed sale of the Company’s Additive Technology Group business (“ATG”) are classified as “Current assets held for sale”, “Long-term assets held for sale”, and “Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 13 for more information.
General Insurance—The Company is generally insured for losses and liabilities for workers’ compensation, physical damage to property, business interruption and comprehensive general, product and vehicle liability under high-deductible insurance policies. The Company records losses when they are probable and reasonably estimable and amortizes insurance premiums over the life of the respective insurance policies (see Note 4).

Legal Claims and Costs—The Company accrues for legal claims and costs in the period in which a claim is made or an event becomes known, if the amounts are probable and reasonably estimable. Each claim is assigned a range of potential liability and the most likely amount is accrued. If there is no amount in the range of potential liability that is most likely, the low end of the range is accrued. The amount accrued includes all costs associated with the claim, including settlements, assessments, judgments and fines. Legal fees are expensed as incurred (see Note 10).
Environmental Matters— Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Environmental accruals are reviewed on a quarterly basis and as events and developments warrant (see Note 10).
Asset Retirement Obligations—Asset retirement obligations are initially recorded at their estimated net present values in the period in which the obligation occurs, with a corresponding increase to the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its settlement value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. When the liability is settled, a gain or loss is recognized for any difference between the settlement amount and the liability that was recorded.
Revenue Recognition—Revenue for product sales, net of estimated allowances and returns, is recognized as risk and title to the product transfer to the customer, which either occurs at the time shipment is made or upon delivery. In situations where product is delivered by pipeline, risk and title transfers when the product moves across an agreed-upon transfer point, which is typically the customers’ property line. Product sales delivered by pipeline are measured based on daily flow meter readings. The Company’s standard terms of delivery are included in its contracts of sale or on its invoices. On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). See further discussion below.
Shipping and Handling—Freight costs that are billed to customers are included in “Net sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Shipping costs are incurred to move the Company’s products from production and storage facilities to the customer. Handling costs are incurred from the point the product is removed from inventory until it is provided to the shipper and generally include costs to store, move and prepare the products for shipment. Shipping and handling costs are recorded in “Cost of sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Research and Development Costs—Funds are committed to research and development activities for technical improvement of products and processes that are expected to contribute to future earnings. All costs associated with research and development are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development and technical service expense was $25, $29 and $32 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Business Realignment Costs—The Company incurred “Business realignment costs” totaling $28, $15 and $9 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These costs primarily included expenses from the Company’s restructuring and cost optimization programs, as well as costs for environmental remediation at certain formerly owned locations.
Pension and Other Non-Pension Postretirement Benefit Liabilities—Pension and other non-pension postretirement benefit (“OPEB”) assumptions are significant inputs to the actuarial models that measure pension and OPEB benefit obligations and related effects on operations. Two assumptions, discount rate and expected return on assets, are important elements of plan expense and asset/liability measurement. The Company evaluates these critical assumptions at least annually on a plan and country-specific basis. The Company periodically evaluates other assumptions involving demographic factors, such as retirement age, mortality and turnover, and updates them to reflect the Company's experience and expectations for the future. Actual results in any given year will often differ from actuarial assumptions because of economic and other factors.
Accumulated and projected benefit obligations are measured as the present value of future cash payments. The Company discounts these cash payments using a split-rate interest approach. This approach uses multiple interest rates from market-observed forward yield curves which correspond to the estimated timing of the related benefit payments. Lower discount rates increase present values and subsequent-year pension expense; higher discount rates decrease present values and subsequent-year pension and OPEB expense.
To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, the Company considers current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets. In developing future return expectations for the principal benefit plans’ assets, the Company evaluates general market trends as well as key elements of asset class returns such as expected earnings growth, yields and spreads across a number of potential scenarios.

Upon the Company’s annual remeasurement of its pension and OPEB liabilities in the fourth quarter, or on an interim basis as triggering events warrant remeasurement, the Company immediately recognizes gains and losses as a mark-to-market (“MTM”) gain or loss through earnings. As such, the Company’s net periodic pension and OPEB expense consists of i) service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of prior service cost/credits recognized on a quarterly basis and ii) MTM adjustments recognized annually in the fourth quarter upon remeasurement of pension and OPEB liabilities or when triggering events warrant remeasurement.
Income Taxes—The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities.

Deferred tax balances are adjusted to reflect tax rates, based on current tax laws, which will be in effect in the years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. For purposes of these financial statements, the international subsidiaries are treated as foreign subsidiaries of a domestic parent, the Company, for all periods presented. Income tax expense for the Company as well as a rate reconciliation is provided in Note 17.
Unrecognized tax benefits are generated when there are differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Tax benefits are recognized in the consolidated financial statements when it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination. Tax benefits are measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. The Company classifies interest and penalties as a component of tax expense.

The Company monitors changes in tax laws and reflects the impact of tax law changes in the period of enactment. In response to the United States tax reform legislation enacted on December 22, 2017, the SEC issued guidance that allows companies to record provisional amounts for the impacts of U.S. tax reform if the full accounting cannot be completed before filing its 2017 financial statements. For provisions of the tax law where companies are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the impact, the guidance allows companies to continue to apply the historical tax provisions in computing its income tax liability and deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017. The guidance also allows companies to finalize accounting for the U.S. tax reform changes within one year of the enactment date.
Derivative Financial Instruments—The Company is a party to forward exchange contracts, foreign exchange rate swaps, interest rate swaps, natural gas futures and electricity forward contracts to reduce its cash flow exposure to changes in interest rates and natural gas and electricity prices. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. These instruments are not accounted for using hedge accounting, but are measured at fair value and recorded in the balance sheet as an asset or liability, depending upon the Company’s underlying rights or obligations. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings (see Note 7).
Stock-Based Compensation—Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award which is amortized as expense over the requisite service period on a graded-vesting basis. The Company does not maintain any stock-based compensation plans; however, certain of the Company’s employees have been granted equity awards denominated in units of Hexion Holdings LLC, Hexion’s ultimate parent. The Company is allocated a share of the related compensation expense (see Note 4).
Transfers of Financial Assets—The Company executes factoring and sales agreements with respect to its trade accounts receivable to support its working capital requirements. The Company accounts for these transactions as either sales-type or financing-type transfers of financial assets based on the terms and conditions of each agreement. For the portion of the sales price that is deferred in a reserve account and subsequently collected, the Company’s policy is to classify the cash in-flows as cash flows from operating activities as the predominant source of the cash flows pertains to the Company’s trade accounts receivable. When the Company retains the servicing rights on the transfers of accounts receivable, it measures these rights at fair value, if material.
Concentrations of Credit Risk—Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily temporary investments and accounts receivable. The Company places its temporary investments with high quality institutions and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution. Concentrations of credit risk for accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of customers in the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographies. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security to support customer receivables.
Corporate Overhead Allocations—In order to properly present the financial results of the Company on a stand-alone basis, corporate controlled expenses incurred by Hexion that are not reimbursed by the Company are allocated to the Company. The amounts are allocated on the basis of “Net sales.” Management believes that the amounts allocated in such a manner are reasonable and consistent. However, the amounts are not necessarily indicative of the costs that would have been incurred if the Company had operated independently (see Note 4).
Concentrations of Supplier Risk—The Company relies on long-term agreements with key suppliers for most of its raw materials. The loss of a key source of supply or a delay in shipments could have an adverse effect on its business. Should any of the suppliers fail to deliver or should any of the key long-term supply contracts be canceled, the Company would be forced to purchase raw materials at current market prices. The Company’s largest supplier provides approximately 10% of raw material purchases. In addition, several of the feedstocks at various facilities are transported through a pipeline from one supplier.
Subsequent Events—The Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to December 31, 2017 through the date of issuance of its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassifications—Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform with current presentations.
Standard Guarantees / Indemnifications—In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into a number of agreements that contain standard guarantees and indemnities where the Company may indemnify another party for, among other things, breaches of representations and warranties. These guarantees or indemnifications are granted under various agreements, including those governing (i) purchases and sales of assets or businesses, (ii) leases of real property, (iii) licenses of intellectual property, (iv) long-term supply agreements, (v) employee benefits services agreements and (vi) agreements with public authorities on subsidies for designated research and development projects. These guarantees or indemnifications are for the benefit of the (i) buyers in sale agreements and sellers in purchase agreements, (ii) landlords or lessors in lease contracts, (iii) licensors or licensees in license agreements, (iv) vendors or customers in long-term supply agreements, (v) service providers in employee benefits services agreements and (vi) governments or agencies subsidizing research or development. In addition, the Company guarantees some of the payables of its subsidiaries to purchase raw materials in the ordinary course of business.

These parties may also be indemnified against any third party claim resulting from the transaction that is contemplated in the underlying agreement. Additionally, in connection with the sale of assets and the divestiture of businesses, the Company may agree to indemnify the buyer for liabilities related to the pre-closing operations of the assets or businesses sold. Indemnities for pre-closing operations generally include tax liabilities, environmental liabilities and employee benefit liabilities that are not assumed by the buyer in the transaction.
Indemnities related to the pre-closing operations of sold assets normally do not represent additional liabilities to the Company, but simply serve to protect the buyer from potential liability associated with the Company’s existing obligations at the time of sale. As with any liability, the Company has accrued for those pre-closing obligations that it considers to be probable and reasonably estimable. The amounts recorded at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are not significant.
While some of these guarantees extend only for the duration of the underlying agreement, many survive the expiration of the term of the agreement or extend into perpetuity (unless they are subject to a legal statute of limitations). There are no specific limitations on the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under its guarantees, nor is the Company able to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made under these guarantees because the triggering events are not predictable.

Our corporate charter also requires us to indemnify, to the extent allowed by New Jersey state corporate law, our directors and officers as well as directors and officers of our subsidiaries and other agents against certain liabilities and expenses incurred by them in carrying out their obligations.
Warranties—The Company does not make express warranties on its products, other than that they comply with the Company’s specifications; therefore, the Company does not record a warranty liability. Adjustments for product quality claims are not material and are charged against net sales.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Newly Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the existing revenue recognition guidance and most industry-specific guidance applicable to revenue recognition. According to the new guidance, an entity will apply a principles-based five step model to recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers and in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The effective date for ASU 2014-09 is for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Entities will have the option of using either a full retrospective approach or a modified approach to adopt the guidance in ASU 2014-09. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 utilizing a modified retrospective approach, which resulted in a cumulative adjustment to equity on the adoption date of January 1, 2018. The implementation of this standard resulted only in timing differences for certain revenue items, which will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Additionally, ASU 2014-09 contains expanded footnote disclosure requirements, which will be reflected in the Company’s SEC filings beginning in 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-02: Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 supersedes the existing lease guidance in Topic 840. According to the new guidance, all leases, with limited scope exceptions, will be recorded on the balance sheet in the form of a liability to make lease payments (lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing the potential impact of this standard on its financial statements through a formalized implementation project.

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-15: Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) (“ASU 2016-15”) as part of the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on treatment in the statement of cash flows for eight specific cash flow topics, with the objective of reducing existing diversity in practice. Of the eight cash flow topics addressed in the new guidance, the topics which could have an impact on the Company include debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, accounts receivable factoring, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims and distributions received from equity method investees. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2016-15 on its financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-18: Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”) as part of the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2016-18 requires that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 also requires supplemental disclosure regarding the nature of restrictions on a company’s cash and cash equivalents, such as the purpose and terms of the restriction, expected duration of the restriction and the amount of cash subject to restriction. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Based on restricted cash balances at December 31, 2017 and 2016, beginning and ending cash balances in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows would include $18 and $17, respectively, of restricted cash upon adoption of this standard.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2017-01: Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805) (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2017-01 on its financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2017-07: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (“ASU 2017-07”). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component of its net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs (“net benefit cost”) in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees during the period. Additionally, ASU 2017-07 only allows the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization into inventory. All other components of net benefit cost, which primarily include interest cost, expected return on assets and the annual mark-to-market liability remeasurement, are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside of income from operations. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Based on the non-service cost components of net benefit cost in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, there would be no net impact for the year ended December 31, 2017 and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, losses of $34 and gains of $17, respectively, would be reclassified from “Operating income” to “Other non-operating expense (income), net” upon adoption of this standard.
Newly Adopted Accounting Standards
In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2015-11: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330) (“ASU 2015-11”) as part of the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2015-11 replaces the existing concept of market value of inventory (where market was defined as replacement cost, with a ceiling of net realizable value and floor of net realizable value less a normal profit margin) with the single measurement of net realizable value. The guidance was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company adopted ASU 2015-11 as of January 1, 2017 and adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-07: Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting(Topic 323) (“ASU 2016-07”) as part of the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2016-07 eliminates the requirement that when an existing investment qualifies for use of the equity method, an investor adjust the investment, results of operations and retained earnings retroactively as if the equity method has been in effect in all previous periods that the investment had been held. Under the new guidance, the equity method investor is only required to adopt the equity method as of the date the investment qualifies for the equity method, with no retrospective adjustment required. The guidance was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company adopted ASU 2016-07 as of January 1, 2017 and adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2016-09: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718) (“ASU 2016-09”) as part of the FASB simplification initiative. ASU 2016-09 simplifies various aspects of share-based payment accounting, including the income tax consequences, classification of equity awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2017 and adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2017-04: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350) (“ASU 2017-04”) as part of the FASB simplification initiative. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, ASU 2017-04 eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, under the amendments in ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, which is Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The guidance is effective for goodwill impairment tests performed after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-04 during 2017. See Note 5 for more information.


3. Restructuring

2017 Restructuring Activities

In November 2017, the Company initiated new restructuring actions with the intent to optimize its cost structure. The total one-time cash costs expected to be incurred for these restructuring activities are estimated at $15, consisting primarily of workforce reduction costs.

The following table summarizes restructuring information:
Total restructuring costs expected to be incurred $15
Restructuring costs incurred through December 31, 2017 $12
   
Accrued liability at December 31, 2016 $
Restructuring charges 12
Payments (1)
Accrued liability at December 31, 2017 $11
4. Related Party Transactions
Product Sales and Purchases
The Company sells finished goods and certain raw materials to Hexion and certain of its subsidiaries. Total sales were $223, $220 and $233 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company also purchases raw materials and finished goods from Hexion and certain of its subsidiaries. Total purchases were $66, $62 and $63 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These transactions are included in “Net sales” and “Cost of sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, accordingly.
The Company sells products to certain Apollo affiliates and other related parties. These sales were $14, $11 and $27 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accounts receivable from these affiliates were $3 at both December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company also purchases raw materials and services from certain Apollo affiliates and other related parties. These purchases were $25, $27 and $29 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company earned $1 as compensation for acting as distributor of products. The Company had accounts payable to these affiliates of $2 at both December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Billed Allocated Expenses
Hexion incurs various administrative and operating costs on behalf of the Company that are reimbursed by the Company. These costs include engineering and technical support, purchasing, quality assurance, sales and customer service, information systems, research and development and certain administrative services. These service costs have been allocated to the Company generally based on sales or sales volumes and when determinable, based on the actual usage of resources. These costs were $43, $39 and $43 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are primarily included within “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Hexion provides global services related to procurement to the Company. These types of services are a raw materials based charge as a result of the global services being primarily related to procurement. The Company’s expense relating to these services totaled $15, $13 and $18 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is classified in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company also has various technology and royalty agreements with Hexion. Charges under these agreements are based on revenue or profits generated. The Company’s total expense related to these agreements was $10, $11 and $20 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is classified in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In addition, Hexion maintains certain insurance policies that benefit the Company. Expenses related to these policies are allocated to the Company based upon sales, and were $4, $5 and $5 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These expenses are included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Foreign Exchange Gain/Loss Agreement
The Company entered into a foreign exchange gain/loss guarantee agreement in 2011 (which was renewed in each year from 2012 through 2017) with Hexion, whereby Hexion agreed to hold the Company neutral for any foreign exchange gains or losses incurred by the Company for statutory purposes associated with certain of its affiliated loans. The Company recorded unrealized (losses)/gains of ($86), $18 and $93 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which has been recorded within “Other non-operating expense (income), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, $85 of the outstanding receivable related to the hedge agreement results from 2014 was converted into an affiliated loan from Hexion to the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $93 of the outstanding receivable related to the hedge agreement results from 2015 was also converted into the outstanding affiliated loan from Hexion to the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the balance of this affiliated loan was reduced by $6 related to the hedge agreement results from 2016 and the first half of 2017, combined with the impact of interest and foreign exchange on the existing loan balance. At December 31, 2016, the balance of this affiliated loan was recorded in "Loans receivable from parent" within the equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2017, the balance of this affiliated loan is recorded in “Long-term loans receivable from affiliates” within the asset section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Cash Pooling Agreement Guarantee
In March 2012, the Company entered into a guarantee agreement with Hexion whereby Hexion agreed to hold the Company neutral for any interest income or expense exposure incurred by the Company for statutory purposes associated with certain of its affiliated loans that were entered into under an internal cash management agreement. In connection with this agreement, the Company recorded less than $1, $2 and $1 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which has been recorded within “Other non-operating expense (income), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Accounts Receivable Factoring Agreement Guarantee
In December 2013, the Company entered into a guarantee agreement with Hexion whereby Hexion agreed to hold the Company neutral for any foreign exchange or bad debt exposure incurred by the Company for statutory purposes associated with purchases and sales of accounts receivable under an internal accounts receivable purchase and sale agreement. In connection with this agreement, the Company recorded income of less than $1 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, which has been recorded within “Other non-operating expense (income), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Other Allocated Expenses
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had affiliated receivables of $90 and $87, respectively, and affiliated payables of $104 and $79, respectively, pertaining to all of the billed related party transactions described above.
Unbilled Allocated Corporate Controlled Expenses

In addition to direct charges, Hexion provides certain administrative services that are not reimbursed by the Company. These costs include corporate controlled expenses such as executive management, legal, health and safety, accounting, tax and credit, and have been allocated herein to the Company on the basis of “Net sales.” The charges also include allocated stock-based compensation expense of less than $1 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, which is included in the Finance section of the table below. Management believes that the amounts are allocated in a manner that is reasonable and consistent, and that these allocations are necessary in order to properly depict the financial results of the Company on a stand-alone basis. However, the amounts are not necessarily indicative of the costs that would have been incurred if the Company had operated independently. These charges are included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, with the offsetting credit recorded in “Paid-in capital.” There is no income tax provided on these amounts because they are not deductible for tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the corporate controlled expense allocations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
  2017 2016 2015
Executive group $
 $
 $3
Environmental, health and safety services 
 1
 1
Finance 4
 4
 2
Total $4
 $5
 $6
See Note 9 for a description of the Company’s affiliated financing and investing activities.

5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The gross carrying amount and accumulated impairments of goodwill consist of the following as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
2017 2016
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Impairments
 
Accumulated Foreign 
Currency Translation
 
Net
Book
Value
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Impairments
 
Accumulated Foreign 
Currency Translation
 
Net
Book
Value
$116
 $(5) $(2) $109
 $116
 $(5) $(13) $98

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows: 
  Total
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2015 $101
Foreign currency translation (3)
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2016 98
Foreign currency translation 11
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2017 (1)
 $109
(1)Patrick J. BartelsIncludes $1 of goodwill related to the ATG Business, included in “Long-term assets held for sale” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Director, Hexion Holdings Corporation/s/ Patrick J. BartelsMarch 10, 2021

The Company’s intangible assets with identifiable useful lives consist of the following as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
  2017 2016
  
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated Impairments 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated Impairments 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
Patents and technology $67
 $
 $(57) $10
 $67
 $
 $(54) $13
Customer lists and contracts 78
 (17) (57) 4
 78
 (17) (57) 4
Other 19
 
 (8) 11
 19
 
 (9) 10
Total $164
 $(17) $(122) $25
 $164
 $(17) $(120) $27
The impact of foreign currency translation on intangible assets is included in accumulated amortization.
Total intangible amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $6, $8 and $9, respectively.
Estimated annual intangible amortization expense for 2018 through 2022 is as follows: 
2018 $4
2019 4
2020 4
2021 2
2022 1
6. Fair Value
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value measurement provisions establish a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. This guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. For example, inputs derived through extrapolation or interpolation that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Following is a summary of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
  Fair Value Measurements Using  
  
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 Total
December 31, 2017        
Derivative assets $
 $135
 $
 $135
December 31, 2016        
Derivative assets $
 $197
 $
 $197

Level 2 derivative liabilities consist of derivative instruments transacted primarily in over-the-counter markets. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 measurements during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
The Company calculates the fair value of its Level 2 derivative liabilities using standard pricing models with market-based inputs, adjusted for nonperformance risk. When its financial instruments are in a liability position, the Company evaluates its credit risk as a component of fair value. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, no adjustment was made by the Company to reduce its derivative liabilities for nonperformance risk.
When its financial instruments are in an asset position, the Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by other parties to these contracts and evaluates their credit risk as a component of fair value.
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements
Following is a summary of losses as a result of the Company measuring assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, all of which were valued using Level 3 inputs.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Long-lived assets held and used$
 $
 $4
Long-lived assets held for disposal/abandonment
 
 2
Total$
 $
 $6
In 2015, as a result of the likelihood that certain long-lived assets would be disposed of before the end of their estimated useful lives resulting in lower future cash flows associated with these assets, the Company wrote down long-lived assets with a carrying value of $5 to fair value of $1, resulting in an impairment charge of $4.
In 2015, as a result of the Company’s decision to dispose of certain long-lived assets before the end of their estimated useful lives, the Company wrote down long-lived assets with a carrying value of $2 to fair value of $0, resulting in an impairment charge of $2.
Non-derivative Financial Instruments
The following table summarizes the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s non-derivative financial instruments:
  Carrying Amount Fair Value
   Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
December 31, 2017         

Non-affiliated debt $162
 $
 $160
 $2
 $162
December 31, 2016          
Non-affiliated debt $97
 $
 $95
 $2
 $97
Fair values of debt classified as Level 2 are determined based on other similar financial instruments, or based upon interest rates that are currently available to the Company for the issuance of debt with similar terms and maturities. Level 3 amounts represent capital leases whose fair value is determined through the use of present value and specific contract terms. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities are considered reasonable estimates of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments.
7. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to certain risks related to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are foreign currency exchange risk and interest rate risk. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
Foreign Exchange Rate Swaps
International operations account for a significant portion of the Company’s revenue and operating income. The Company’s policy is to reduce foreign currency cash flow exposure from exchange rate fluctuations by hedging anticipated and firmly committed transactions when it is economically feasible. The Company periodically enters into forward contracts to buy and sell foreign currencies to reduce foreign exchange exposure and protect the U.S. dollar value of certain transactions to the extent of the amount under contract. The counter-parties to our forward contracts are financial institutions with investment grade ratings. The Company does not apply hedge accounting to these derivative instruments.

The Company is party to various foreign exchange rate swaps in Brazil in order to reduce the foreign currency risk associated with certain assets and liabilities of its Brazilian subsidiary that are denominated in U.S. dollars. The counter-parties to the foreign exchange rate swap agreements are financial institutions with investment grade ratings. The Company does not apply hedge accounting to these derivative instruments.
Foreign Exchange Gain/Loss Agreement
The Company entered into a foreign exchange gain/loss guarantee agreement in 2011 (which was renewed in each of 2012 through 2017) with Hexion whereby Hexion agreed to hold the Company neutral for any foreign exchange gains or losses incurred by the Company for income tax purposes associated with certain of its affiliated loans. This arrangement qualifies as a derivative and is recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company does not apply hedge accounting to this derivative instrument.
The following table summarizes the Company’s derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities as of December 31:
  2017 2016  
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments 
Average
Days to
Maturity
 
Average
Contract
Rate
 
Notional
Amount
 Fair Value Asset 
Average
Days to
Maturity
 
Average
Contract
Rate
 
Notional
Amount
 Fair Value Asset 
Location of Derivative
Asset
Foreign Exchange Gain/Loss Agreement                  
Foreign exchange gain/loss agreement with affiliate 365
 
 $665
 $135
 365
 
 $506
 $197
 Accounts payable to affiliates and Long-term loans receivable from affiliates
Foreign Exchange Rate Swaps                  
Brazil foreign exchange rate swaps - asset 
 
 5
 
 
 
 7
 
 Other current assets
Brazil foreign exchange rate swaps - liability 
 
 17
 
 
 
 4
 
 Other current liabilities
Total       $135
       $197
  
The following table summarizes gains and losses recognized on the Company’s derivative financial instruments, which are recorded in “Other non-operating expense (income), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income for the Year Ended December 31:
 2017 2016 2015
Foreign Exchange Gain/Loss Agreement      
Foreign exchange gain/loss agreement with affiliate $(86) $18
 $93
Foreign Exchange Rate Swaps      
Brazil foreign exchange rate swaps 
 
 1
Total $(86) $18
 $94
8. Non-Affiliated Debt and Lease Obligations
Non-affiliated debt outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
  2017 2016
  Long-Term 
Due Within
One Year
 Long-Term 
Due Within
One Year
ABL Facility $63
 $
 $
 $
Other Borrowings:        
Australia Facility due 2018 at 4.6% and 4.1% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively 
 50
 
 51
Brazilian bank loans at 9.9% and 11.2% at December 31, 2017 and 2016 9
 34
 14
 26
Capital leases and other 4
 2
 4
 2
Total $76
 $86
 $18
 $79

ABL Facility
In March 2013, Hexion entered into a $400 asset-based revolving loan facility, subject to a borrowing base (the “ABL Facility”). The ABL Facility replaced Hexion's senior secured credit facilities, which included a $171 revolving credit facility and the $47 synthetic letter of credit facility at the time of the termination of facilities upon Hexion's entry into the ABL Facility.
In December 2016, Hexion amended and restated the ABL Facility, with modifications to, among other things, permit the refinancing of the Old Senior Secured Notes with new first-priority senior secured notes, new senior secured notes and/or other secured or unsecured indebtedness. In connection with the issuance of the new notes in February 2017, certain lenders under the ABL Facility provided extended revolving facility commitments in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $350 with a maturity date of December 5, 2021 (subject to the early maturity triggers described below), the existing commitments were terminated and the size of the ABL Facility was reduced from $400 to $350.
As amended, the ABL Facility has a maturity date of December 5, 2021 unless, if 91 days prior to the scheduled maturity of the 6.625% First-Priority Senior Notes due 2020 and the 10.00% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes, more than $50 aggregate principal amount of these notes are outstanding, in which case the ABL Facility will mature on such earlier date. Additionally, if 91 days prior to the scheduled maturity of the 9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020, more than $50 aggregate principal amount of these notes are outstanding, the ABL Facility will mature on such earlier date.
The ABL Facility bears interest at a floating rate based on, at the Company’s option, an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an initial applicable margin of 2.25% or an alternate base rate plus an initial applicable margin of 1.25%. From and after the date of delivery of the Company's financial statements for the first fiscal quarter ended after the effective date of the ABL Facility, the applicable margin for such borrowings will be adjusted depending on the availability under the ABL Facility. As of December 31, 2017, the applicable margin for LIBOR rate loans was 2.25% and for alternate base rate loans was 1.25%. In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the ABL Facility, the Company is required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders in respect of the unutilized commitments at an initial rate equal to 0.50% per annum, subject to adjustment depending on the usage. The ABL Facility does not have any financial maintenance covenants, other than a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 that only applies if availability under the ABL Facility is less than the greater of (a) $35 and (b) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time. The fixed charge coverage ratio under the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility is generally defined as the ratio for the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters of (a) Adjusted EBITDA minus non-financed capital expenditures and cash taxes to (b) debt service plus cash interest expense plus certain restricted payments, each measured for the four most recent quarters in which financial statements have been delivered.The ABL Facility is secured by, among other things, first-priority liens on most of the inventory and accounts receivable and related assets of Hexion, its domestic subsidiaries and certain of its foreign subsidiaries (the “ABL Priority Collateral”), and by second-priority liens on certain collateral that generally includes most of Hexion’s, its domestic subsidiaries’ and certain of its foreign subsidiaries’ assets other than the ABL Priority Collateral, in each case subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens.
Available borrowings to the Company’s subsidiaries under the ABL Facility were $137 as of December 31, 2017, and there were $63 outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility as of December 31, 2017.
Other Borrowings
The Company’s Australian Term Loan Facility has a variable interest rate equal to the 90 day Australian or New Zealand Bank Bill Rates plus an applicable margin. The agreement also provides access to a $8 revolving credit facility. There were no outstanding balances on the revolving credit facility at either December 31, 2017 or 2016. In February 2018, the Company extended its Australian Term Loan Facility through January 2021.
The Brazilian bank loans represent various bank loans, primarily for working capital purposes and to finance the construction of manufacturing facilities.
In addition to available borrowings under Hexion’s revolving credit facility, the Company has available borrowings under various international credit facilities. At December 31, 2017, under these international credit facilities the Company had $18 available to fund working capital needs and capital expenditures. While these facilities are primarily unsecured, portions of the lines are collateralized by equipment and cash and short term investments at December 31, 2017.
Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, ULC (a subsidiary of CO-OP, “Hexion NSF”), along with Hexion, are co-issuers and obligors of $574 of 9.00% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020, as well as the 8.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, which were satisfied and discharged by Hexion on February 8, 2017. These notes are guaranteed by Hexion’s subsidiaries, and are not reflected in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Aggregate maturities of debt and minimum annual rentals under operating leases at December 31, 2017, for the Company are as follows:
Year Debt 
Minimum
Rentals Under
Operating Leases
 
Minimum
Payments Under
Capital Leases
2018 $86
 $8
 $
2019 4
 7
 
2020 68
 4
 
2021 3
 3
 
2022 
 2
 
2023 and beyond 
 5
 1
Total minimum payments $161
 $29
 1
Less: Amount representing interest     (1)
Present value of minimum payments     $
The Company’s operating leases consist primarily of vehicles, equipment, land and buildings. Rental expense under operating leases amounted to $8, $6 and $7 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
9. Affiliated Financing
The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding loans payable and loans receivable with unconsolidated affiliates as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, as well as the corresponding interest expense (income) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
  2017 2016
  Long-Term Due Within One Year Interest Expense (Income) Long-Term 
Due Within
One Year
 Interest Expense (Income)
Affiliated debt payable:            
Loan payable to Hexion due 2020 at 9.0% at December 31, 2017 and 2016 (1)
 $306
 $
 $26
 $268
 $
 $25
Loan payable to Hexion due 2020 at 10.0% at December 31, 2017 and 2016 (2)
 148
 
 13
 125
 
 12
Loan payable to Hexion due 2020 at 6.6% at December 31, 2017 and 2016 (3)
 583
 
 39
 583
 
 38
Loan payable to Hexion due 2017 at 2.6% at December 31, 2016 (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 2
Other loans due to Hexion and affiliates at 5.3% and 4.8% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively (5)
 59
 31
 5
 63
 46
 5
Total affiliated debt payable (6)
 $1,096
 $31
 $83
 $1,039
 $46
 $82
             
Affiliated debt receivable:            
Loan receivable from Hexion due 2017 at 2.5% at December 31, 2016 (7)
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $145
 $(4)
Other loans due from Hexion and affiliates at 3.7% and 3.3% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively (8)(9)
 208
 4
 (8) 180
 28
 (7)
Total affiliated debt receivable (10)
 $208
 $4
 $(8) $180
 $173
 $(11)
(1)Jeffrey D. BenjaminLoan issued in 2010 in conjunction with CO-OP’s acquisition of a German subsidiary.Director, Hexion Holdings Corporation/s/ Jeffrey D. BenjaminMarch 10, 2021
(2)James N. ChapmanLoan issued in 2010 in conjunction with Canadian tax restructuring.Director, Hexion Holdings Corporation/s/ James N. ChapmanMarch 10, 2021
(3)Joaquin DelgadoLoan issued in 2012 in conjunction with Hexion’s refinancing activities in 2012 and 2013.Director, Hexion Holdings Corporation/s/ Joaquin DelgadoMarch 10, 2021
(4)Carol S. EicherLoan issued in 2014 for cash management purposes and settled in 2016.Director, Hexion Holdings Corporation/s/ Carol S. EicherMarch 10, 2021
(5)Michael J. ShannonOther loans payable for tax and cash management purposes.Director, Hexion Holdings Corporation/s/ Michael J. ShannonMarch 10, 2021
(6)John K. WulffThe total outstanding loans payable balances are included in “Affiliated debt payable within one year” and “Affiliated long-term debt” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Director, Hexion Holdings Corporation/s/ John K. WulffMarch 10, 2021
(7)Stephen D. NewlinLoan issued in 2015 for cash management purposes and settled in 2017.Director, Hexion Holdings Corporation/s/ Stephen D. NewlinMarch 10, 2021
(8)Other loans receivable for tax and cash management purposes.
(9)Included in other loans receivable as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 is $173 and $179, respectively, related to the conversion of outstanding receivables related to the FX hedge agreement results into an affiliated loan from Hexion to the Company. At December 31, 2016, the balance of this affiliated was recorded as in equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as the loan receivable from Hexion was permanent in nature and not expected to be repaid in the foreseeable future. In 2017, the impact of the internal reorganization within the Hexion group resulted in the Company no longer designating this loan receivable as permanent. As a result, the outstanding balance of this loan was reclassified from equity to “Long-term loans receivable from affiliates” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017.
(10)The total outstanding loans receivable balances are included in “Loans receivable from affiliates” and “Long-term loans receivable from affiliates” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

10. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Matters
The Company’s operations involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials. The Company is subject to extensive environmental regulation and is therefore exposed to the risk of claims for environmental remediation or restoration. In addition, violations of environmental laws or permits may result in restrictions being imposed on operating activities, substantial fines, penalties, damages or other costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Environmental Institution of Paraná IAP—On August 10, 2005, the Environmental Institute of Paraná (IAP), an environmental agency in the State of Paraná, provided Hexion Quimica Industria, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, with notice of an environmental assessment in the amount of 12 Brazilian reals. The assessment related to alleged environmental damages to the Paranagua Bay caused in November 2004 from an explosion on a shipping vessel carrying methanol purchased by the Company. The investigations performed by the public authorities have not identified any actions of the Company that contributed to or caused the accident. The Company responded to the assessment by filing a request to have it cancelled and by obtaining an injunction precluding execution of the assessment pending adjudication of the issue. In November 2010, the Court denied the Company’s request to cancel the assessment and lifted the injunction that had been issued. The Company responded to the ruling by filing an appeal in the State of Paraná Court of Appeals. In March 2012, the Company was informed that the Court of Appeals had denied the Company’s appeal, and on June 4, 2012 the Company filed appeals to the Superior Court of Justice and the Supreme Court of Brazil. In September 2016, the Superior Court of Justice decided that strict liability does not apply to administrative fines issued by environmental agencies and reversed the decision of the State of Paraná Court of Appeals. The Superior Court of Justice remanded the case back to the Court of Appeals to determine if the IAP met its burden of proving negligence by the Company. In September 2017, the State of Paraná Court of Appeals decided that IAP did not prove that the Company was negligent and granted the Company’s request to annul the environmental assessment. IAP filed a motion for clarification regarding the Court of Appeals’ analysis of the case and the Company filed a motion for clarification regarding attorney fees.  After the pending motions are resolved, IAP will have 15 business days to file an appeal with the Superior Court of Justice. The Company does not believe that a loss is probable. At December 31, 2017, the amount of the assessment, including tax, penalties, monetary correction and interest, is 44 Brazilian reals, or approximately $13.
The following table summarizes all probable environmental remediation, indemnification and restoration liabilities, including related legal expenses, at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Hexion Inc. | 165 | 2020 Form 10-K
  Liability 
2017 Range of Reasonably Possible Costs  
Site Description December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 Low High
Currently-owned $3
 $2
 $2
 $6
Formerly-owned:        
Remediation 1
 1
 1
 2
Monitoring only 
 
 
 
Total $4
 $3
 $3
 $8
These amounts include estimates for unasserted claims that the Company believes are probable of loss and reasonably estimable. The estimate of the range of reasonably possible costs is less certain than the estimates upon which the liabilities are based. To establish the upper end of a range, assumptions less favorable to the Company among the range of reasonably possible outcomes were used. As with any estimate, if facts or circumstances change, the final outcome could differ materially from these estimates. At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, $1 and $2, respectively, has been included in “Other current liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets with the remaining amount included in “Other long-term liabilities.”
Non-Environmental Legal Matters
The Company is involved in various product liability, commercial and employment litigation, personal injury, property damage and other legal proceedings that are considered to be in the ordinary course of business. The Company has reserves of $1 and $2 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for all non-environmental legal defense costs incurred and settlement costs that it believes are probable and estimable. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, $1 has been included in “Other current liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets with the remaining amount included in “Other long-term liabilities.”

Other Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase Commitments
The Company has entered into contractual agreements with third parties for the supply of site services, utilities, materials and facilities and for operation and maintenance services necessary to operate certain of the Company’s facilities on a stand-alone basis. The duration of the contracts range from less than one year to 20 years, depending on the nature of services. These contracts may be terminated by either party under certain conditions as provided for in the respective agreements; generally, 90 days notice is required for short-term contracts and three years notice is required for longer-term contracts (generally those contracts in excess of five years). Contractual pricing generally includes a fixed and variable component.
In addition, the Company has entered into contractual agreements with third parties to purchase feedstocks or other services. The terms of these agreements vary from one to ten years and may be extended at the Company’s request and are cancelable by either party as provided for in each agreement. Feedstock prices are based on market prices less negotiated volume discounts or cost input formulas. The Company is required to make minimum annual payments under these contracts as follows:  
Year Minimum Annual Purchase Commitments
2018 $174
2019 80
2020 80
2021 9
2022 9
2023 and beyond 68
Total minimum payments 420
Less: Amount representing interest (29)
Present value of minimum payments $391
11. Pension and Non-Pension Postretirement Benefit Plans
Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension plans covering certain associates primarily in Canada, Netherlands, Germany, Brazil, France, Belgium and Malaysia. Depending on the plan, benefits are based on eligible compensation and/or years of credited service. The Company also sponsors defined contribution plans in some locations. Non-pension postretirement benefit plans are also provided to associates in Canada, Brazil and to certain associates in the Netherlands. The Canadian plan provides retirees and their dependents with medical and life insurance benefits, which are supplemental benefits to the respective provincial healthcare plan in Canada. The Brazilian plan became effective in 2012 as a result of a change in certain regulations, and provides retirees with access to medical benefits, with the retiree being responsible for 100% of the premiums. In 2014, the plan was amended such that 100% of the premiums of active employees are paid by the Company. The Netherlands’ plan provides a lump sum payment at retirement for grandfathered associates.

The following table presents the change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and components of funded status for the Company’s defined benefit pension and non-pension postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31: 
 Pension Benefits 
Postretirement
Benefits
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Change in Benefit Obligation       
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$548
 $492
 $10
 $9
Service cost16
 14
 
 
Interest cost9
 10
 1
 1
Actuarial (gains) losses(6) 57
 
 (1)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes77
 (13) 
 1
Benefits paid(11) (10) 
 
Reduction due to divestitures
 (3) 
 
Plan amendments2
 
 
 
Employee contributions1
 1
 
 
Benefit obligation at end of year636
 548
 11
 10
Change in Plan Assets       
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year349
 316
 
 
Actual return on plan assets4
 33
 
 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes48
 (10) 
 
Employer contributions21
 19
 
 
Benefits paid(11) (10) 
 
Employee contributions1
 1
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year412
 349
 
 
Funded status of the plan at end of year$(224) $(199) $(11) $(10)
The foreign currency impact reflected in these rollforward tables are primarily for changes in the euro and Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar.
 Pension Benefits 
Postretirement
Benefits
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 consist of:       
Other current liabilities$(5) $(4) $(1) $
Long-term pension obligations(220) (195) (10) (10)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 (3) 1
 2
Net amounts recognized$(225) $(202) $(10) $(8)
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31 consist of:       
Net prior service (benefit) cost$(1) $(4) $2
 $3
Deferred income taxes1
 1
 (1) (1)
Net amounts recognized$
 $(3) $1
 $2
Accumulated benefit obligation$587
 $504
    
Accumulated benefit obligation for funded plans393
 350
    
Pension plans with underfunded or non-funded accumulated benefit obligations at December 31:       
Aggregate projected benefit obligation$615
 $173
    
Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation567
 164
    
Aggregate fair value of plan assets391
 9
    
Pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at December 31:       
Aggregate projected benefit obligation$615
 $548
    
Aggregate fair value of plan assets391
 349
    


Following are the components of net pension and postretirement expense (benefit) recognized for the years ended December 31:
 Pension Benefits Postretirement benefits
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Service cost$16
 $14
 $16
 $
 $
 $
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation9
 10
 12
 1
 1
 1
Expected return on assets(11) (10) (13) 
 
 
Amortization of prior service benefit(1) (1) 
 
 
 
Unrealized actuarial loss (gain)1
 35
 (16) 1
 (1) (1)
Net expense (benefit)$14
 $48
 $(1) $2
 $
 $
The following amounts were recognized in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” during the year ended December 31, 2017:
 Pension Benefits Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits 
Total 
Prior service benefit from plan amendments$2
 $
 $2
Amortization of prior service benefit1
 (1) 
Loss (gain) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax$3
 $(1) $2
The amounts in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost (benefit) during the next fiscal year are less than $1.
Determination of actuarial assumptions
The Company’s actuarial assumptions are determined separately for each plan, taking into account the demographics of the population, the target asset allocations for funded plans, regional economic trends, statutory requirements and other factors that could impact the benefit obligation and plan assets. For the European plans, most assumptions are set by country, as the plans within these countries have similar demographics, and are impacted by the same regional economic trends and statutory requirements.
The discount rates selected reflect the rate at which pension obligations could be effectively settled. The Company selects the discount rates based on cash flow models using the yields of high-grade corporate bonds or the local equivalent with maturities consistent with the Company’s anticipated cash flow projections. The Company’s pension and OPEB liabilities and related service and interest cost are calculated using a split-rate interest discounting methodology, whereby expected future cash flows related to these liabilities are discounted using multiple interest rates on a forward curve that correspond to the timing of the expected cash flows.
The expected rates of future compensation level increases are based on salary and wage trends in the chemical and other similar industries, as well as the Company’s specific compensation targets by country. Input is obtained from the Company’s internal Human Resources group and from outside actuaries. These rates include components for wage rate inflation and merit increases.
The expected long-term rate of return on Canadian plan assets is determined based on the plan’s current and projected asset mix. To determine the expected overall long-term rate of return on assets, the Company takes into account the rates on long-term debt investments held within the portfolio, as well as expected trends in the equity markets. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed and the Company consults with its actuaries, as well as investment professionals, to confirm that the Company’s assumptions are reasonable.
The weighted average rates used to determine the benefit obligations were as follows at December 31: 
 
Pension
Benefits
 
Postretirement
Benefits
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Discount rate1.9% 1.9% 5.3% 6.0%
Rate of increase in future compensation levels2.4% 2.4% 
 
The weighted average assumed health care cost trend rates are as follows at December 31:       
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
 
 5.8% 5.9%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
 
 4.5% 4.5%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
 
 2023
 2030

The weighted average rates used to determine net periodic pension and postretirement expense were as follows for the years ended December 31: 
 Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Discount rate1.9% 2.3% 2.2% 6.0% 5.5% 6.1%
Rate of increase in future compensation levels2.4% 2.4% 3.0% 
 
 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets2.9% 3.1% 3.8% 
 
 
A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would change the projected benefit obligation for non-pension postretirement benefits by $2 and service cost and interest cost by a negligible amount.
Pension Investment Policies and Strategies
The Company’s investment strategy for the assets of its Canadian defined benefit pension plans is to maximize the long-term return on plan assets using a mix of equities and fixed income investments with a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan funded status and expected timing of future cash flow requirements. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed-income investments. Equity investments are also diversified across Canadian and foreign stocks, as well as growth, value and small and large capitalization investments. Investment risk and performance are measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through periodic investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements and periodic asset and liability studies.
The Company periodically reviews its target allocation of Canadian plan assets among various asset classes. The targeted allocations are based on anticipated asset performance, discussions with investment professionals and on the projected timing of future benefit payments.
The Company observes local regulations and customs regarding its European pension plans in determining asset allocations, which generally require a blended weight leaning toward more fixed income securities, including government bonds. 
  Actual Target
  2017 2016 2017
Weighted average allocations of pension plan assets at December 31:      
Equity securities 22% 23% 22%
Debt securities 76% 74% 78%
Cash, short-term investments and other 2% 3% %
Total 100% 100% 100%
Fair Value of Plan Assets
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value measurement provisions establish a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. This guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. For example, inputs derived through extrapolation or interpolation that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.

Certain investments measured at net asset value (“NAV”), as a practical expedient for fair value, have been excluded from the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents pension plan investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
 Fair Value Measurements Using
 2017 2016
 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) 
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) 
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobserv-able
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Pooled insurance products with fixed income guarantee (1)
$
 $11
 $
 $11
 $
 $9
 $
 $9
Total$
 $11
 $
 $11
 $
 $9
 $
 $9
Investments measured at fair value using net asset value as a practical expedient:               
Other international equity funds (2)
      $90
       $82
Other fixed income securities (2)
      311
       258
Total      $412
       $349
(1)Level 2 equity and fixed income securities are primarily in pooled asset and mutual funds and are valued based on underlying net asset value multiplied by the number of shares held. The underlying asset values are based on observable inputs and quoted market prices.
(2)Represents investments in commingled funds with exposure to a variety of hedge fund strategies, which are not publicly traded and have ongoing redemption restrictions. The Company’s interest in these investments is measured at net asset value per share as a practical expedient for fair value, which is derived from the underlying asset values in these funds, only some of which represent observable inputs and quoted market prices. In accordance with ASU 2015-07, these investments are excluded from the fair value hierarchy.
Projections of Plan Contributions and Benefit Payments
The Company expects to make contributions of $23 to its defined benefit pension plans in 2018.
Estimated future plan benefit payments as of December 31, 2017 are as follows: 
 Pension Benefits 
Postretirement
Benefits
2018$12
 $1
201913
 
202012
 
202114
 
202215
 
2023-202797
 2
Defined Contribution and Other Plans
The Company sponsors a number of defined contribution plans for its associates in various countries. For most plans, employee contributions are voluntary, and the Company provides contributions ranging from 2% to 10%. Total charges to operations for matching contributions under these plans were $3, $2 and $4 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company’s German subsidiaries offer a government subsidized early retirement program to eligible associates called an Altersteilzeit Plan. The German government provides a subsidy in certain cases where the participant is replaced with a qualifying candidate. This subsidy was discontinued for associates electing participation in the program after December 31, 2009. The Company had liabilities for these arrangements of$1 both at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company incurred expense for these plans of less than $1 for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
Also included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at both December 31, 2017 and 2016 are other post-employment benefit obligations primarily relating to liabilities for jubilee benefit plans offered to certain European associates of $2.


12. Hexion PAC Business Disposition
On June 30, 2016, Hexion completed the sale of its Performance Adhesives, Powder Coatings, Additives & Acrylic Coatings and Monomers businesses (“Hexion PAC Business”) pursuant to the terms of a Purchase Agreement with Synthomer plc (the “Buyer”) dated March 18, 2016. Assets included in the transaction are the Company’s manufacturing sites in Sokolov, Czech Republic; Sant’Albano, Italy; Leuna, Germany; and Asua, Spain. The Hexion PAC Business produces resins, polymers, monomers and additives that provide enhanced performance for adhesives, sealants, paints, coatings, mortars and cements used primarily in consumer, industrial and building and construction applications. Hexion also agreed to provide certain transitional services to the Buyer for a limited period of time following the closing of the transaction.
Hexion received gross cash consideration for the Hexion PAC business in the amount of $226, less approximately $6 relating to liabilities transferred to the Buyer, net of cash and estimated working capital that transferred to the Buyer as part of the Purchase Agreement. A subsequent post-closing adjustment to the purchase price of less than $1 was made in accordance with the Purchase Agreement. The Company received allocated proceeds from the sale of $107, and recognized a gain on this disposition of $28, which is recorded in “Gain on disposition” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Hexion PAC Business had pre-tax income of $8 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, which is reported as a component of “(Loss) income before income taxes and earnings from unconsolidated entities” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

13. Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale

In December 2017, Hexion announced the proposed sale of its Additives Technology Group business (“ATG”) to MÜNZING CHEMIE GmbH (“MÜNZING”), a privately-owned specialty additive company headquartered in Abstatt, Germany. On January 8, 2018, the sale was completed and Hexion received gross cash considerations of approximately $50, subject to customary post-closing adjustments. The Company received allocated proceeds from the sale of $26, and recognized a gain on this disposition of $21. Proceeds from the sale will be used for general corporate purposes.
14. Step Acquisition
In August 2015, the Company acquired the remaining 50% interest in Momentive Union Specialty Chemicals Ltd (“MUSC”), a joint venture that manufactures phenolic specialty resins in China, from its joint venture partner to better position the Company to serve its customers in this region. As a result of the transaction, the Company now owns a 100% interest in MUSC. This transaction was accounted for as a step acquisition and the allocation of the consideration exchanged was based upon a valuation of MUSC’s net identifiable assets and liabilities as of the transaction date. A gain of $5 was recorded in “Other operating (income) expense, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, which represents the difference between the $10 fair value and $5 carrying value of the Company’s previously held 50% non-controlling interest in MUSC on the acquisition date. The fair value of the non-controlling interest was determined using a market approach.
15. Deficit
Shareholder’s deficit reflects the common equity of the Company with all of the common equity of its subsidiaries eliminated as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
In 2016 and 2015, $93 and $85, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding receivable related to the results of the foreign exchange gain/loss guarantee agreement with Hexion was converted into an affiliated loan from Hexion to the Company (see Note 4), which was reflected in "Loans receivable from parent" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015 due to the Company’s determination that this affiliated loan was permanent in nature. In 2017, the balance of this affiliated loan was reduced by $6 related to the results of the foreign exchange gain/loss guarantee agreement from 2016 and the first half of 2017, combined with the impact of interest and foreign exchange on the existing loan balance. Further, the impact of the internal reorganization within the Hexion group resulted in the Company no longer designating this affiliated loan as permanent. As a result, the outstanding balance of this loan was reclassified from equity to “Long-term loans receivable from affiliates” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017.
In 2017, the Company made a non-cash return of capital to Hexion of $158, which is reflected as a reduction to “Paid-in capital” in the Consolidated Statements of Deficit.
16. Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Following is a summary of changes in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 Year Ended December 31, 2017 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Plans Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Total Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Plans Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Total
Beginning balance$
 $(86) $(86) $1
 $(62) $(61)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax(2) 29
 27
 (1) (24) (25)
Ending balance$(2) $(57) $(59) $
 $(86) $(86)

17. Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the Company for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Current:     
Federal $
 $6
 $
Foreign15
 23
 19
Total current15
 29
 19
Deferred:     
Federal (2) 2
 
Foreign3
 
 8
Total deferred1
 2
 8
Income tax expense$16
 $31
 $27
A reconciliation of the Company’s combined differences between income taxes computed at the Dutch federal statutory tax rate of 25.0% and provisions for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Income taxes computed at federal statutory tax rate$(32) $18
 $53
Foreign rate differentials(1) (5) 11
Losses (gains) and other expenses (income) not deducted (excluded) for tax18
 (2) 
Increase (decrease) in the taxes due to changes in valuation allowance27
 (15) (45)
Additional tax expense on foreign unrepatriated earnings1
 1
 3
Additional expense for uncertain tax positions4
 14
 5
Write-off of foreign net operating losses
 20
 
Tax recognized in other comprehensive income(1) 
 
Income tax expense$16
 $31
 $27
The domestic and foreign components of the Company’s (loss) income before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Domestic$(143) $122
 $156
Foreign15
 (49) 56
Total$(128) $73
 $212
The tax effects of the Company’s significant temporary differences and net operating loss and credit carryforwards which comprise the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 and 2016, are as follows:
 2017 2016
Assets:   
Non-pension post-employment$4
 $3
Accrued and other expenses15
 14
Property, plant and equipment1
 2
Intangibles6
 6
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards108
 82
Pension liabilities40
 37
Gross deferred tax assets174
 144
Valuation allowance(146) (119)
Net deferred tax asset28
 25
Liabilities:   
Property, plant and equipment(17) (12)
Unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries(5) (4)
Intangibles(5) (6)
Gross deferred tax liabilities(27) (22)
Net deferred tax asset$1
 $3

The following table summarizes the presentation of the Company’s net deferred tax asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
Assets:2017 2016
Long-term deferred income taxes (Other long-term assets)$8
 $12
Liabilities:   
Long-term deferred income taxes(7) (9)
Net deferred tax asset$1
 $3
The Company’s deferred tax assets primarily include domestic and foreign net operating loss carryforwards and disallowed interest carryforwards. As of December 31, 2017, the domestic net operating loss carryforwards available are $344, which expire beginning in 2019. A valuation allowance of $86 has been provided against a portion of these attributes. The foreign net operating loss carryforwards and disallowed interest carryforwards available are $149. These attributes are related primarily to Germany which have an unlimited carryover and do not expire. A valuation allowance has been provided against these foreign tax attributes.
The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, certain of its subsidiaries file income tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examinations by taxing authorities throughout the world, including major jurisdictions such as the Netherlands, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom.
With minor exceptions, the Company’s closed tax years for major jurisdictions are years prior to: 2010 for Netherlands, 2011 for Brazil, 2010 for Canada, 2014 for Germany, 2007 for Italy, and 2012 for the United Kingdom.
The Company continuously reviews issues that are raised from ongoing examinations and open tax years to evaluate the adequacy of its liabilities. As the various taxing authorities continue with their audit/examination programs, The Company will adjust its reserves accordingly to reflect these settlements.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: 
 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of year$54
 $44
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year3
 4
Additions for tax positions of prior years
 41
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(1) (35)
Lapse of statue of limitations1
 
Foreign currency translation5
 
Balance at end of year$62
 $54
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company increased the amount of its unrecognized tax benefits, including its accrual for interest and penalties, by $10, primarily as a result of increases in the unrecognized tax benefit for various intercompany transactions, offset by releases of unrecognized tax benefits from negotiations with foreign jurisdictions and lapses of statute of limitations. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized approximately $3, $4 and $2, respectively, in interest and penalties. The Company had approximately $14 and $11 accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
$62 of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate; however, a portion of the unrecognized tax benefit would be in the form of a net operating loss carryforward, which would be subject to a full valuation allowance. The Company anticipates recognizing less than $1 of the total amount of the unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months as a result of negotiations with foreign jurisdictions and completion of audit examinations.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Management of
Hexion International Cooperatief U.A.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Hexion International Cooperatief U.A. and its subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated balance sheetsas of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, deficit, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017.

Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the Company's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control.Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hexion International Cooperatief U.A. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations andtheir cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Emphasis of Matter

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for goodwill impairments in 2017. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Columbus, Ohio
March 2, 2018



157