UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-K
(Mark One) 
þ
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020
OR
For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2018
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from  to
For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-00123
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware61-0143150
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)
850 Dixie Highway
Louisville, Kentucky
 
Louisville,Kentucky40210
(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (502) (502585-1100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock (voting), $0.15 par valueBFANew York Stock Exchange
Class B Common Stock (nonvoting), $0.15 par valueBFBNew York Stock Exchange
1.200% Notes due 2026BF26New York Stock Exchange
2.600% Notes due 2028BF28New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.      Yesþ     No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.      Yes  ¨Noþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      Yesþ     No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).      Yesþ     No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerþ Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨
   Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes¨     No  þ
The aggregate market value, as of the last business day of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter, of the voting and nonvoting equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $14,900,000,000.$22,100,000,000.
The number of shares outstanding for each of the registrant’s classes of Common Stock on May 31, 2018,2020, was:
Class A Common Stock (voting), $0.15 par value169,048,402169,039,764

Class B Common Stock (nonvoting), $0.15 par value312,063,220309,196,858

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement of Registrant for use in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held July 26, 2018,30, 2020, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.




 Table of Contents 
  Page
PART I 
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II 
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
PART III 
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
PART IV 
Item 15.
Item 16.






Forward-Looking Statement Information. Certain matters discussed in this report, including the information presented in Part II under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contain statements, estimates, and projections that are “forward-looking statements” as defined under U.S. federal securities laws. Words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “aspire,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “envision,” “estimate,” “expect,” “expectation,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “pursue,” “see,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar words indicate forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date we make them. Except as required by law, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors (many beyond our control) that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical experience or from our current expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in Part I under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including:


Unfavorable global or regionalImpact of health epidemics and pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting negative economic conditionsimpact and related low consumer confidence, high unemployment, weak credit or capital markets, budget deficits, burdensome government debt, austerity measures, higher interest rates, higher taxes, political instability, higher inflation, deflation, lower returns on pension assets, or lower discount rates for pension obligationsgovernmental actions
Risks associated with being a U.S.-based company with global operations, including commercial, political, and financial risks; local labor policies and conditions; protectionist trade policies, or economic or trade sanctions, including potentialadditional retaliatory tariffs on American spirits;spirits and the effectiveness of our actions to mitigate the negative impact on our margins, sales, and distributors; compliance with local trade practices and other regulations, including anti-corruption laws;regulations; terrorism; and health pandemics
Failure to comply with anti-corruption laws, trade sanctions and restrictions, or similar laws or regulations
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly a stronger U.S. dollar
Changes in laws, regulations,regulatory measures, or governmental policies – especially those that affect the production, importation, marketing, labeling, pricing, distribution, sale, or consumption of our beverage alcohol products
Tax rate changes (including excise, sales, VAT, tariffs, duties, corporate, individual income, dividends, or capital gains) or changes in related reserves, changes in tax rules or accounting standards, and the unpredictability and suddenness with which they can occur
The impact ofUnfavorable global or regional economic conditions, particularly related to the recently enacted U.S. tax reform legislation, including as a result of future regulationsCOVID-19 pandemic, and guidance interpreting the statuterelated economic slowdowns or recessions, low consumer confidence, high unemployment, weak credit or capital markets, budget deficits, burdensome government debt, austerity measures, higher interest rates, higher taxes, political instability, higher inflation, deflation, lower returns on pension assets, or lower discount rates for pension obligations
Dependence upon the continued growth of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands
Changes in consumer preferences, consumption, or purchase patterns – particularly away from larger producers in favor of small distilleries or local producers, or away from brown spirits, our premium products, or spirits generally, and our ability to anticipate or react to them; legalization of marijuana use on a more widespread basis; shifts in consumer purchase practices from traditional to e-commerce retailers; bar, restaurant, travel, or other on-premise declines; shifts in demographic or health and wellness trends; or unfavorable consumer reaction to new products, line extensions, package changes, product reformulations, or other product innovation
Decline in the social acceptability of beverage alcohol in significant markets
Production facility, aging warehouse, or supply chain disruption
Imprecision in supply/demand forecasting
Higher costs, lower quality, or unavailability of energy, water, raw materials, product ingredients, labor, or finished goods
Route-to-consumer changes that affect the timingSignificant additional labeling or warning requirements or limitations on availability of our sales, temporarily disrupt the marketing or sale of ourbeverage alcohol products or result in higher fixed costs
Inventory fluctuations in our products by distributors, wholesalers, or retailers
Competitors’ and retailers’ consolidation or other competitive activities, such as pricing actions (including price reductions, promotions, discounting, couponing, or free goods), marketing, category expansion, product introductions, or entry or expansion in our geographic markets or distribution networks
Route-to-consumer changes that affect the timing of our sales, temporarily disrupt the marketing or sale of our products, or result in higher fixed costs
Inventory fluctuations in our products by distributors, wholesalers, or retailers
Risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions, business partnerships, or investments – such as acquisition integration, termination difficulties or costs, or impairment in recorded value
InadequateCounterfeiting and inadequate protection of our intellectual property rights
Product recalls or other product liability claims, or product counterfeiting, tampering, contamination, or quality issues
Significant legal disputes and proceedings, or government investigations
FailureCyber breach or breachfailure or corruption of key information technology systems, or failure to comply with personal data protection laws
Negative publicity related to our company, products, brands, marketing, personnel,executive leadership, employees, board of directors, family stockholders, operations, business performance, or prospects
Failure to attract or retain key executive or employee talent
Our status as a family “controlled company” under New York Stock Exchange rules, and our dual classdual-class share structure

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information. Certain matters discussed in this report, including the information presented in Part II under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” include measures that are not measures of financial performance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for any measure derived in accordance with GAAP, and also may be inconsistent with similarly titled measures presented by other companies. In Part II under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion

and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” we present the reasons we use these measures under the heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measures,” and we reconcile these measures to the most closely comparable GAAP measures under the heading “Results of Operations – Year-Over-Year Comparisons.”
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
Brown-Forman Corporation (the “Company,” “Brown-Forman,” “we,” “us,” or “our” below) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1933, successor to a business founded in 1870 as a partnership and later incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Kentucky in 1901. We primarily manufacture, distill, bottle, import, export, market, and sell a wide variety of alcoholic beverages under recognized brands. We employ overapproximately 4,800 people (excluding individuals that work on a part-time or temporary basis) on six continents, including approximately 1,3001,200 people in Louisville, Kentucky, USA, home of our world headquarters. We are the largest American-owned spirits and wine company with global reach. We are a “controlled company” under New York Stock Exchange rules because the Brown family owns more than 50% of our voting stock. Additionally, takingTaking into account ownership of shares of our non-voting stock, the Brown family also controls more than 50% of the economic ownership in Brown-Forman.
For a discussion of recent developments, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Executive Summary.”

Brands
Beginning in 1870 with Old Forester Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whisky – our founding brand – and spanning the generations since, we have built a portfolio of more than 40 spirit, ready-to-drink (RTD) cocktail, and wine brands that includes some of the best-known and most-lovedmost loved trademarks in our industry. The most important brand in our portfolio is Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey, which iswas ranked in the fourth-largest2019 Interbrand “Best Global Brands” as the most valuable global spirits brand of any kindin the world and the third most valuable beverage alcohol brand. Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey is the largest American whiskey brand in the world and the fourth-largest premium spirits brand of any kind, according to Impact Databank’s “Top 100 Premium Spirits Brands Worldwide” list. Among the top five premium spirits brands on the list, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey was the only one to grow volume in each of the past five calendar years. In its fifth year on the Worldwide Impact list, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey was recognized as a top 15 growth brand and remains the second-largest-selling flavored whiskey. Our other leading global brands on the Worldwide Impact list are Finlandia, which is the tenth-largest-selling vodka; Canadian Mist,Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey, which is the fourth-largest-selling Canadian whisky;second-largest-selling flavored whiskey; and el Jimador, which is the fifth-largest-selling tequila and designated as an Impact “Hot Brand.” Additionally,tequila. Woodford Reserve wasand Old Forester were once again selected as anfor the Impact “Hot Brand.Brand,1 list marking seven and two consecutive years on the list, respectively.
Principal Brands
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey
Korbel California Brandy5
Jack Daniel’s RTDs2
 el Jimador Tequilas
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey el Jimador New Mix RTDs
Jack Daniel’s RTDsHerradura Tequilas
Gentleman Jack Rare Tennessee Whiskey 
Sonoma-Cutrer California Wines

Herradura Tequilas6
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire��
Canadian Mist Canadian Whisky

Sonoma-Cutrer California Wines
Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection23
 
Canadian Mist Canadian Whisky7 
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee RyeGlenDronach Single Malt Scotch Whisky

Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye3
BenRiach Single Malt Scotch Whisky


Jack Daniel’s Sinatra Select 
GlenglassaughBenRiach Single Malt Scotch Whisky

Jack Daniel’s Winter JackChambord Liqueur
Jack Daniel’s No. 27 Gold Tennessee Whiskey Glenglassaugh Single Malt Scotch Whisky
Jack Daniel’s Winter JackOld Forester Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whisky
Woodford Reserve Kentucky Bourbon
Jack Daniel’s Bottled-in-Bond
 Old Forester Whiskey Row Series
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Apple4
Old Forester Kentucky Straight Rye Whisky
Woodford Reserve Kentucky Bourbon
Chambord Liqueur
Woodford Reserve Double Oaked

 
Early Times Kentucky Whisky and Bourbon7
Woodford Reserve Kentucky Rye Whiskey



 Pepe Lopez Tequila
Finlandia Vodkas

Woodford Reserve Kentucky Straight Malt Whiskey
 Antiguo Tequila
Korbel California ChampagnesWoodford Reserve Kentucky Straight Wheat Whiskey4
 Slane Irish Whiskey
Korbel California Brandy4
Finlandia Vodkas

 Coopers’ Craft Kentucky Bourbon

Korbel California Champagnes5
Fords Gin8
1Impact Databank, March 2018.2020.
2Jack Daniel’s RTDs includes Jack Daniel’s & Cola, Jack Daniel’s & Diet Cola, Jack & Ginger, Jack Daniel’s Country Cocktails, Gentleman Jack & Cola, Jack Daniel’s Double Jack, Jack Daniel’s American Serve, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey RTD, Jack Daniel’s Berry, Jack Daniel’s Cider, and Jack Daniel’s Lynchburg Lemonade.
3The Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection includes Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Select, Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Barrel Proof, Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Rye, and Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel 100 Proof.
34New brandbrands launched in September 2017.fiscal 2020.
45While Korbel is not an owned brand, webrand. We sell Korbel products under contract in the United States and other select markets.
6Herradura Tequilas comprise all expressions of Herradura including Herradura Ultra.
7Entered into an agreement on June 12, 2020 to sell these brands to Sazerac Company
8Acquired in fiscal 2020.
See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Fiscal 20182020 Brand Highlights” for brand performance details.
Our vision in marketing is to be the best brand buildersbrand-builder in the industry. We build our brands by investing in programsplatforms that we believe create enduring connections with our consumers. These programsplatforms cover a wide spectrum of activities, including media advertising (TV, radio, print, outdoor, and, increasingly, digital and social), consumer and trade promotions, sponsorships, and homeplacevisitors’ center programs at our distilleries and our winery. We expect to grow our sales and profits by consistently delivering creative, responsible marketing programs that drive brand recognition, brand trial, brand loyalty and, ultimately, consumer demand around the world.

Markets
We sell our products in over 170 countries around the world. The United States, our most important market, accounted for 47%50% of our net sales in fiscal 2018. Our largest international markets include2020 and the other 50% were outside of the United Kingdom, Australia, Mexico, Germany, France, Poland, Russia, Brazil, and Canada. In fiscal 2018, we generated 53% of our net sales outside the United States compared to 56% in fiscal 2014.States. The United States proportion of net sales grew from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2016 then stayed constant in fiscal 2017, mainly due to the negative effect of foreign exchange on our international business. We presentfollowing represents the percentage of total net sales by geographic area for our largest markets for the most recent fivethree fiscal years below:
Percentage of Total Net Sales by Geographic Area
Year ended April 30Year ended April 30
20142015201620172018201820192020
United States44%46%48%48%47%47%47%50%
International: 
Europe28%27%27%26%27%
United Kingdom6%6%5%
Germany5%5%5%
Australia6%6%5%5%5%5%5%5%
Mexico5%5%5%
Other22%21%20%21%21%32%32%30%
Total International56%54%52%52%53%
TOTAL100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

  
For details about net sales in our largest markets, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Fiscal 20182020 Market Highlights.” For details about our reportable segment and for additional geographic information about net sales and long-lived assets, see Note 1417 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” For details on risks related to our global operations, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Distribution Network and Customers
Our distribution network, which we sometimes referor our “route to as our “route-to-consumer”consumer” (RTC), takes a variety of forms,varies depending on (a) a market’sthe laws and regulatory framework for trade in beverage alcohol by market, (b) our assessment of a market’s long-term attractiveness and competitive dynamics, (c) the relative profitability of distribution options available to us, (d) the structure of the retail and wholesale trade in a market, and (e) our portfolio’s development stage in a market. As these factors change, we evaluate our RTC strategy and, from time to time, adapt our model.
In the United States, which generally prohibits spirits and wine manufacturers from selling their products directly to consumers, we sell our brands either to distributors or to state governments (in states that directly control alcohol sales) to state governments that then sell to retail customers and consumers.
Outside the United States, we use a variety of RTC models, which can be grouped into three categories: owned distribution, partner, and government-controlled markets. We own and operate distribution companies in 14 markets: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Czechia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Spain, and Turkey. Effective May 1, 2020, we launched our own distribution companies in Thailand and Turkey.the United Kingdom. In these owned-distribution markets, and in a large portion of the Travel Retail channel, we sell our products directly to retailers to wholesalers, or in Canada, to provincial governments. Over the past decade, we began distribution operations in multiple markets outside the United States, as shown in the table below.

Recent Route-to-Consumer Changes
Fiscal yearMarket
2011Germany
Brazil
2012Turkey
2014France
2018Spain
In the United Kingdom, we partner in a cost-sharing arrangement with another supplier, Bacardi Limited, to sell a portfolio of both companies’ brands.wholesalers. In many other markets, including Russia, Japan, Italy, and South Africa, we rely on othersthird parties to distribute our brands, generally under fixed-term distribution contracts. In Canada, we sell our products to provincial governments.
We believe that our customer relationships are good. We believegood and our exposure to concentrations of credit risk is limited due to the diverse geographic areas covered by our operations.operations and our thorough evaluation of each customer. In 2020, our two largest customers were Republic National Distributing Company and Breakthru Beverage Group, which accounted for approximately 18% and 13% of consolidated net sales, respectively. Although the loss of any large customer for an extended period of time would negatively impact our net sales and operating income, we do not anticipate this happening due to consumer demand for our products and our relationships with our customers. Collectively, these two customers distribute our brands across most of the United States. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated net sales in 2020.
Seasonality
Holiday buying makes the fourth calendar quarter (generally, our third fiscal quarter) the peak season for our business. Approximately 31%, 30%, and 31% of our net sales for fiscal 2016,2018, fiscal 2017,2019, and fiscal 2018, respectively,2020 were in the fourth calendar quarter.quarter of each year.

Competition
Trade information indicates that we are one of the largest global suppliers of premium spirits. According to International Wine & Spirit Research (IWSR), for calendar year 2017,2019, the ten largest global spirits companies controlled less thanjust over 20% of the total global market for spirits sold around the world (on a volume basis). While we believe that the overall market environment offers considerable growth opportunities for us, our industry is, now, and will remain, highly competitive. We compete against many global, regional, and local brands in a variety of categories of beverage alcohol, but our brands compete primarily in the industry’s premium-and-higher price categories.points. Our competitors include major global spirits and wine companies, such as Bacardi Limited, Becle S.A.B. de C.V., Beam Suntory Inc., Davide Campari-Milano S.p.A., Diageo PLC, LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, Pernod Ricard SA, and Rémy Cointreau. In addition, particularly in the United States, we increasingly compete with national companies and craft spirit brands, many of which are recent entrants toentered the industry.market in the last few years.
Brand recognition, brand provenance, quality of product and packaging, availability, flavor profile, and price affect consumers’ choices among competing brands in our industry. SeveralOther factors also influence consumers’ buying decisions, including: advertising; promotions;consumers, including advertising, promotions, merchandising in bars, restaurants, and shops;at the point of sale, expert or celebrity endorsement;endorsement, social media and word of mouth;mouth, and the timing and relevance of new product introductions. Although some competitors have substantially greater resources than we do, we believe that our competitive position is strong, particularly as it relates to brand recognition,awareness, quality, availability, and relevance of new product introductions.
Ingredients and Other Supplies
The principal raw materials used in manufacturing and packaging our distilled spirits, liqueurs, RTD products, and wines are shown in the table below.
Principal Raw Materials
Distilled Spirits Liqueurs RTD Products Wines Packaging
Agave Flavorings Flavorings Grapes Aluminum cans
Barley Neutral spirits Malt Wood Cartons
Corn Sugar Neutral spirits   Closures
Malted barley Water Sugar   Glass bottles
Rye Whiskey Tequila   Labels
Sugar Wine Water   
PET1 bottles
Water   Whiskey    
Wood        
  
1Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is a polymer used in non-glass containers.

Currently, none of these raw materials are in short supply, but shortages could occur. From time to time, our agricultural ingredients (agave, barley, corn, grapes, malted barley, rye, and rye)wood) could be adversely affected by weather and other forces out of our control that might constrain supply.supply or reduce our inventory below desired levels for optimum production.
Whiskeys, certain tequilas, and certain other distilled spirits must be aged. Because we must schedule production years in advance to meet projected future demand, for these products, our inventories of themthese products may be larger in relation to sales and total assets than in many other businesses.
For details on risks related to the unavailability of raw materials and the inherent uncertainty in forecasting supply and demand, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property rights includeincludes trademarks, copyrights, proprietary packaging and trade dress, proprietary manufacturing technologies, know-how, and patents. Our intellectual property, especially our trademarks, is essential to our business. We register our trademarks broadly – some of them in every country where registration is possible. We register othersaround the world, focusing primarily on where we sell or expect to sell our products. We protect our intellectual property rights vigorously but fairly. We have licensed some of our trademarks to third parties for use with services or on products other than alcoholic beverages, which we believe enhances the awareness and protection of our brands.
For details on risks related to the protection of our intellectual property, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” For details on our most important brands, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Fiscal 20182020 Brand Highlights.”

Regulatory Environment
Federal, state, local, and foreign authorities regulate how we produce, store, transport, distribute, market, and sell our products. Some countries and local jurisdictions prohibit or restrict the marketing or sale of distilled spirits in whole or in part.
In the United States, at the federal level, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury regulates the spirits and wine industry with respect to the production, blending, bottling, labeling, advertising, sales, advertising, and transportation of beverage alcohol. Similar regulatory regimes exist at the state level and in most non-U.S. jurisdictions where we sell our products. In addition, beverage alcohol products are subject to customs duties, excise taxes, or excise taxationsales taxes in many countries, including taxation at the federal, state, and local level in the United States.
Laws of each nation defineMany countries set their own distilling and maturation requirements; for example, under U.S. federal and state regulations, bourbon and Tennessee whiskeys must be aged in new charred oak barrels; we typically age our whiskeys three to six years. Canadian whisky must be manufactured in Canada in compliance with Canadian laws. Mexican authorities regulate the production and bottling of tequilas; they mandate minimum aging periods for extraanejo (three years), anejo (one year), and reposado (two months) tequilas.. Irish whiskey must be matured at least three years in a wood cask, such as oak, on the island of Ireland. Scotch whisky must be matured in oak casks for at least three years in Scotland. We comply with all of the above laws and regulations.
Our operations are subject to various environmental protection statutes and regulations, and our policy is to comply with them.


Integrated Strategy
Eight
strategyimage.jpg
For 150 years, ago, we introduced our “Brown-Forman 150” long-term strategy, focused onBrown-Forman and the Brown family have been committed to driving sustainable growth toward our 150th anniversary in 2020.and preserving Brown-Forman as a thriving, family-controlled, independent company. The B-F Arrow articulates our core principles:image on the left illustrates our purpose, “Enriching Life,” and our ambition, “Nothing Better in the Market,” surrounded by the values that have guided us for decades: integrity, respect, trust, teamwork, and excellence. In addition to these guiding principles, our success is dependent on our strategic priorities, as well asillustrated in the vision,image on the right: the quality of our brands within our portfolio, our geographic diversification, the caliber of our people, and the investments we make to grow our business. Moreover, an integrated lens recognizes that many aspects of our company contribute to creating value for our shareholders over the long term, including our commitment to sustainability, responsibility, diversity and inclusion, and supporting and working to solve the health, education, and social inequities, particularly the racial divide, in the communities where we live and work.
In the face of unprecedented business conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important we look to our values and behaviors thatlong-term strategy to guide us, while leveraging our agility to quickly adapt to changing business conditions. We have faced and overcome formidable challenges over the span of a century and a half: two world wars, United States Prohibition, the Great Depression, recessions, and now the COVID-19 pandemic. Navigating unpredictable economies, weather, market whims, and many more variables have simply been part of the long-term nature of our business. While the way we expectwork has changed and our employees to embrace and exhibit.
bfarrowenglisha01a01a13.jpg
These core principles are a constant, powerful means of connecting our stakeholders to our shared vision of “Building Forever,” andbusiness has been affected, we continue to refreshprioritize the health, safety, and well-being of our strategiesemployees and communities and advance our brands and business despite these challenges.
For the second consecutive year, we are integrating our Corporate Responsibility and Annual Reports not only to provide a more holistic view of Brown-Forman, but also to reflect current realitieswho we are and look beyond 2020. The strategic ambitions described below both demonstrateour culture. Our integrated report combines our responsibility and sustainability information alongside financial data to provide a sustained focus on several driversmore comprehensive view of our recent growth and acknowledge today’s emerging opportunities.business results.
Portfolio
We seek to build brands responsibly and businesses that create shareholder value – ones that deliverby delivering strong and long-term sustainable growth, solid margins, and high returns on invested capital. In addition, givenGiven our growingexpectation to continue to grow in size and scale, we focusare focusing on building brands that can be meaningful for our company and our consumers over time. Our first prioritythe longer term. One of our priorities is to innovate and grow our premium spirits portfolio organically. But as opportunities arise,organically and through innovation. Opportunistically and thoughtfully, we willalso consider acquisitions and partnerships that meetwill enhance our rigorous quantitativeportfolio and qualitative criteria.our capacity to deliver meaningful growth, attractive margins, and acceptable returns.
It is important to us that we pursue brand growth while actively promoting a positive drinking culture to enhance consumer experiences with our brands. We balance this work while holding steady to our commitment to market our products responsibly. Regulation of our industry is not new, and external pressure from the World Health Organization and other health bodies has grown over time. We uphold high standards of self-regulation by adhering to industry guidelines on responsible marketing and advertising. We work both independently and with industry organizations to promote alcohol responsibility, such as the

International Alliance for Responsible Drinking, the Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility (responsibility.org) in the United States, The Portman Group in the United Kingdom, DrinkWise in Australia, and FISAC in Mexico.
The Jack Daniel’s family of brands, led by Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey (JDTW), remainsis our most valuable asset – the engine of our overall financial performance and the engine that drivesfoundation of our global leadership ofposition in the American whiskey categorycategory.1 We strive to strengthen the brand’s leadership, and our overall financial performance. We will always work to keep JDTW strong, healthy, and relevant to consumers worldwide, and to take advantage ofwhile pursuing the abundant opportunities to grow the Jack Daniel’s family of brands across markets, premium and above price points, channels, and consumer groups. Product innovation has become a meaningful contributorcontinues to contribute meaningfully to our performance in recent years. Newperformance. Different Jack Daniel’s expressions bring new consumers to the franchise, including Honey (2011), Fire (2015), and Rye (2017) – have led innovation in the American whiskey category.
We are the global leader in American whiskey,(2018), and see significant opportunities to continue promoting the mixability, versatility, accessibility, and premiumization of our American whiskey brands around the world. We believe that we can leverage our whiskey-making knowledge, production assets, trademarks, and brand-building skills to accomplish this objective. We will focus first on the global growth of our most important expression, JDTW, though with a heightened focus on the super-premium expressions within the trademark – namely, Gentleman Jack, Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection, andrecent launch, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye. Apple (2020), which individually and collectively add great value to the Company and our consumers.
In addition to the leadership of our Jack Daniel’s family of brands, we expect to continue generating excellentstrong growth witharound the world from our other whiskey brands, around the world, particularly Woodford Reserve and Old Forester. We believe Woodford Reserve is the leading super-premium American whiskey globally.globally1, surpassing one million nine-liter cases during fiscal 2020, and is poised for continued growth as interest in bourbon increases around the world. Old Forester is regaininghas continued its return to prominence in the United States and in select international markets through its unparalleled taste quality, and quality. Innovation has had a role in premiumizing both of these brands, including the success of its high-end expressions, such as Woodford Double Oaked and the Old Forester Whiskey Row Series and Old Forester Statesman.Series.
In 2017, we unveiledOutside of our Slane Irish Whiskey brand in Ireland, select Travel Retail locations, and in select markets across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The distillery and homeplace were completed this past year, and we are very encouraged by the brand’s early performance and the accolades the brand,American whiskey and package have received.


1IWSR, 2017 data.

Throughbrands, our acquisition of The BenRiach Distillery Company Limited in June 2016, we added three world-class single malt Scotch whisky brands in The GlenDronach, BenRiach, and Glenglassaugh. Following the integration of the acquired business, we have continued to evolve the portfolio and geographic strategy to ensure our single malt portfolio is well positioned to become ain other high-growth categories with meaningful contributorpremium brands and a significant competitor in the fast growing single malt category over the longer term. Here again, we are very encouraged by the trade and consumer reception to the brands and the whisky.
Fiscal 2017 marked the ten-year anniversary offocus on accelerating our acquisition of Casa Herradura, asuper-premium portfolio. Our tequila portfolio is led by two brands steeped in Mexican heritage, Herradura and el Jimador. WeDespite cyclical cost pressures resulting from the unprecedented cost of agave, we remain pleased with the developmentgrowth of our tequila business in both Mexico and the United States over the brands’ two primary markets. We planpast decade and the long-term growth prospects of this business globally. GlenDronach, BenRiach, Glenglassaugh, and Slane are well positioned in the categories of Scotch and Irish whiskey and are expected to continue expanding Herradura tequila to reach new consumersbecome meaningful contributors over the longer term. Lastly, we believe our newest acquisition in Mexico, the United States, and other high-potential markets. In additionsummer of 2019, Fords Gin, provides superior access to the success of the brand’s core expressions, Herradura Ultra – an ultra-premium cristalino – continues to accelerate and surpassed 70,000 nine-liter cases in fiscal 2018. After repositioning el Jimador tequila as a morefast-growing premium brand in Mexico, we remain encouraged by our prospects for long-term, profitable growth there. Outside Mexico, we have nearly quadrupled el Jimador’s volumes since fiscal 2008. We remain confident in el Jimador’s potential to improve its position among the world’s leading tequila brands as thegin category, continues to develop rapidlyparticularly in the United States, and we look to expand (though more gradually) internationally.grow this brand in key gin markets globally.
Finlandia,Part of building all of our brands and engaging our employees is through education, including resources and training on alcohol responsibility – what it means, how to be a good host/hostess, respecting the tenth-largest-selling vodkachoice not to drink, preventing drunk/drink driving, and providing support for those in recovery. Our internal campaign, Pause, launched in the world,1 is also prominent in severalsummer of 2019, seeks to elevate responsibility, raise awareness, and inspire more action from our employees. Our Chambord liqueur brand, through a partnership with the world’s largest vodka markets, such as Poland, Russia, Ukraine,nonprofit group Alteristic, offers training to bartenders and Czechia. We planemployees on bystander intervention to grow Finlandia where its position is strong, including in its largest market, Poland, where Finlandia accounts for one out of every two bottles of imported vodka sold.2help prevent sexual assault.
Geography
The United States remains our largest market, and continuing to grow thereits continued growth is important to our long-term success. We expect to foster this growth by emphasizing fast-growing spirits categories, such as super-premium whiskeys and tequilas, continued product and packaging innovation, and brand building within growing consumer segments, (withincluding increasing emphasis on multicultural marketing).inclusive marketing.
Over the last two decades, our business outsideOutside the United States, has generally grown faster than our business within it. Fiscal 2018 saw a return to this trend after a few years of suppressed international growth driven by the negative effect of foreign exchange. Our ability to achieve our long-term growth objectives requires further development of our business globally, especially in emerging markets. We expect towe continue to growincrease our business in developed markets such as France, Germany, Australia, and the United Kingdom. We will continuecompetitiveness through improved routes to pursue RTC strategies that will expand our access to and understanding of consumers,consumer, with the most recent example being the establishment of our owned distribution organizationorganizations in Spain, the world’s tenth largest whiskey market,2 duringUnited Kingdom and Thailand in May 2020. The more direct connection with customers and consumers enabled through owned distribution in markets such as Australia, France, Germany, and now the summerUnited Kingdom and Thailand is an important part of 2017.our strategic growth. In addition, we expect increasinglyincreasing significant contributions to our long-term future growth from emerging markets including Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Poland, Turkey,Russia, and Southeast Asia.
People
As we work to increase our brands’ relevance and appeal to diverse consumer groups around the world, we believe a diversity of experiences and mindsets within our own workforce is essential. In the summer of 2019, we unveiled Many Spirits, One Brown-Forman, our Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) 2030 Strategy aimed at creating a foundation from which to build a more diverse workforce and inclusive culture. Brown-Forman’s vision for D&I is to create an environment where leveraging diversity and inclusion occurs naturally, giving us a sustainable marketplace advantage. We have set gender and race ambitions to have at least 40 percent female senior leaders globally and 25 percent people of color in the United States by 2030. We anticipate expanding this work to other elements of diversity in the future. For the tenth year in a row, we earned a perfect score in the Corporate


1IWSR, 2019 data.

Equality Index1, a national benchmarking survey and report on corporate policies and practices related to LGBTQ workplace equality administered by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation.
While we have had a long-standing commitment to cultivate a diverse and inclusive culture, we know we must be better and do better to bring about sustainable change for our Black colleagues and communities. Racism is a global problem, and there are no easy, quick, or simple solutions for the systemic challenges we face as a society. We are hopeful that recent times will be a catalyst for greater awareness, conversations, and positive actions, specifically those that explore how we live our value of respect, how we identify and eliminate bias in ourselves, and how we continue to create an inclusive environment and relationships that foster allyship. Our company leaders have re-committed to a renewed emphasis on allyship, encouraging discussions about race, allyship, and personal D&I journeys. We have publicly committed to specific actions and to making progress as individuals and a global organization, within our industry and local community, and through the influence of our brand and corporate voice2.
One of the main drivers of an inclusive culture is the continued growth and leadership of our Employee Resource Groups (ERGs), including our ninth and newest group, EAST (Embracing Asian Societies and Traditions), established in the summer of 2019. We believe ERGs are instrumental in enriching our company’s culture, and our employees experience this by supporting development and engagement of our diverse workforce, driving cultural awareness and competency across the organization, and enabling authentic engagement with our consumers. Our ERGs also create safe spaces for our employees of specific characteristics and their allies to connect with, support, and advocate for one another.
We know that this strong employee culture and our commitment to the communities where we live and work also helps foster a sense of engagement among our employees. In fact, our Employee Engagement and Enablement survey results from the fall of 2019 reaffirmed what we have long known – our employees are highly engaged, highly enabled, and highly committed to our core values of integrity, respect, trust, teamwork, and excellence. In addition to this internal affirmation, we have received numerous external accolades, including being named a “Great Place to Work” in Brazil, China, Russia, Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America,France, Mexico, and Eastern Europe.Spain.
Investment
One thing we have learned over a century and a half is that long-term success requires investment and a mindset of sustainability. We understand the need to invest in our brands, production facilities, distillery homeplace and visitor centers, and aging inventory. We also understand the importance of investing in our people, communities, and the environment. We recognize that climate change is a business issue with risks and opportunities. As such, we are committed to actions that will ensure the long-term health of both the planet and our business. One example of our long-term focus is our investment in renewable energy. Our wind power project, which became operational in April 2020, provides a renewable energy source that we expect will offset more than 90% of our electricity usage in the United States. This will enable us to fully achieve our greenhouse gas target, established in 2013, of cutting our absolute greenhouse gas emissions by 15% by 2023, from a 2012 baseline. In order to manage water risk, we have completed Source Vulnerability Assessments to evaluate watersheds we operate in that are considered at-risk or business critical. Following the assessments, we have begun to develop programs to address the risk. We continue to make progress toward our goal of sending zero-waste to landfill for all of our owned facilities by the end of the 2020 calendar year. By the end the 2019 calendar year, we achieved zero-waste at 14 of our owned facilities. In total, Brown-Forman facilities divert 99.7% of waste from landfill. Although our largest facilities have achieved zero-waste and thus push our total to meet our goal, we are still working to improve some facilities that have not yet achieved zero-waste. Finally, recognizing the importance of demonstrating leadership at the executive level, we also appointed a Chief Sustainability Officer role, to engage with our Board of Directors as well as the Brown-Forman / Brown Family Shareholders Committee.
We believe we are better positioned than ever to deliver exceptional products to our loyal consumers around the world. We have a highly capable and engaged workforce. We have developed brand-building capabilities by equipping our teams with the training and tools necessary to win in an increasingly data-driven digital global marketplace. In the fall of 2019, we announced that havingEnergy BBDO would be our new global creative agency of record for the majority of our global brand portfolio, including the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, Woodford Reserve, Herradura, el Jimador, and Old Forester. This relationship is expected to bring new energy and perspective to the portfolio that we believe will enable us to make meaningful connections with consumers as we continue to build our brands.
Community Relations
In addition to the investments we make in our employees, we believe it is vital that we give back to the communities that support both our employees and our company by thoughtfully deploying our time, talent, and resources. We have been a proud

1Human Rights Campaign 2020 Corporate Equality Index at www.hrc.org/cei
2Brown-Forman Be Better, Do Better at www.brown-forman.com/be_better_do_better

corporate citizen of our hometown of Louisville, Kentucky for our entire 150 year history. Our expanded focus and commitment to the neighborhood around our corporate campus, while local, meets this call to be the best neighbor we can be, an ambition we strive for wherever we operate. We made a $2 million donation to the Republic Bank Foundation YMCA in west Louisville in fiscal 2019, which seeks to expand health and wellness resources to an underserved part of our community. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we donated nearly $2 million to relief efforts in the United States and other locations where we work.
We also seek to expand our civic engagement into additional Brown-Forman global office locations, allowing those employees closest to the needs of their communities to decide how to invest their charitable-giving resources. We leverage our key community relations partners to stay informed of collaborative opportunities in the communities where we work and live, and to shape our charitable giving strategy to meet the essential needs of the communities that sustain us. We provide charitable donations and our employees volunteer throughout our communities, including 130 serving on nonprofit boards of directors. The Brown-Forman Foundation (the Foundation) was created in fiscal 2018 with the goal of helping fund our ongoing philanthropic endeavors. The Foundation’s earnings will provide a consistent source of revenue for charitable giving independent of our annual earnings. We work to partner with organizations that support our key focus areas: enhancing arts and cultural living, ensuring essential living standards, and empowering responsible and sustainable living.
Having a long-term-focused, committed, and engaged shareholder base, anchored by the Brown family, gives us an important strategic advantage, particularly in a business with aged products and multi-generational brands. For nearly 150 years, the Company and the Brown family have beenbrands committed to preserving Brown-Forman as a thriving, family-controlled, independent company.
corporate responsibility and our deeply held values. Recognizing the strong cash-generating capacity and the capital efficiency of our business, we will continue to pursue what we believetop-tier shareholder return through shareholder-friendly capital allocation and socially and environmentally conscious investments to be well-balanced capital deployment strategies aimed at perpetuating Brown-Forman’s strength and independence.fuel long-term growth.
Corporate Responsibility
In pursuing the objectives described above, we will strive to be responsible in everything we do. Our history of responsibility began in 1870, when our founder, George Garvin Brown, first sold whiskey in glass bottles to ensure quality and safety – an innovation some might consider the first act of corporate responsibility in the industry. Today, achieving our stated business purpose, to “enrich the experience of life,” is possible only within a context of corporate responsibility. This means putting our values in action by promoting responsible consumption of alcohol; providing a healthy, safe, inclusive, and engaging workplace; protecting the environment; and making a positive contribution to our communities.
Values-Driven Organization. The foundation of our culture is our core values: Integrity, Trust, Respect, Teamwork, and Excellence. Our employee engagement survey responses demonstrate that we not only state these words as our values, but we live them, too. Our values are reflected in our Code of Business Conduct that employees acknowledge and pledge to comply with. Additionally, in the spirit of teamwork, we use our values as one set of criteria when evaluating business partners.
1Impact Databank, March 2018.
2IWSR, 2017 data.

Alcohol Responsibility. Our business is based on the belief that beverage alcohol, consumed in moderation, can enrich the experience of life. However, we are well aware that, when consumed irresponsibly, alcohol can have harmful effects on individuals and society. We appreciate the need for governments to regulate our industry appropriately and effectively, taking into account national circumstances and local cultures. We also appreciate that some people should not drink or choose not to drink, and we respect this choice. Acting in partnership with others, we want to be part of the solution to real, complex problems such as underage drinking, drunk driving, overconsumption, and alcoholism.
As a significant player in the global beverage alcohol industry, we foster collective action with our peers. Working with other producers, we are able to leverage our views on a scale that can create change. In 2017, we concluded our five-year program with 10 other industry leaders that signed the Beer, Wine, and Spirits Producers’ Commitments to Reduce Harmful Drinking. Our collective progress on these commitments will be reported later in 2018 and can be seen at www.producerscommitments.org.
Since 2009, we have hosted an open forum to share our points of view, post the research of outside experts, and encourage the opinions of others at www.OurThinkingAboutDrinking.com. In the past year, we have added information from contributors on a variety of alcohol-related subjects, including addiction and pregnancy, moderate consumption, and alcohol and aggression.
In 2017, Korbel partnered with the Dryver designated driver service to provide more than 2,000 free designated drivers in 77 cities nationwide. In Poland we partnered with Carrefour, a large retailer chain, to deliver key responsibility messages to consumers across 90 of their stores. For the fourth consecutive year, the New Hampshire (NH) Liquor Commission and Jack Daniel’s teamed up for the award-winning Live Free & Host Responsibly campaign. Since its launch in 2015, the campaign has reached thousands of NH Liquor & Wine Outlet customers, promoting responsible service and consumption of alcohol. This first-of-its-kind collaboration between a control state and a beverage alcohol company has become a model for the industry, gaining widespread attention and industry praise. We also continued to collaborate with the Responsible Retailing Forum, which brings together diverse stakeholders seeking to reduce underage sales, among other initiatives. In our consumer relationships, we seek to communicate through responsible advertising content and placement, relying on our comprehensive internal marketing code and adhering to industry marketing and advertising guidelines. We also engage with our customers through our trade associations. For example, we worked with Avec Modération in France to engage convenience stores on underage drinking prevention.
As part of our commitment to responsible marketing, and to enable consumers to make more informed decisions, in February 2017 we launched a website, nutrition.brown-forman.com, providing nutritional information on our brands. Since then, we have added three additional markets and languages to the site, with plans to add four more in the coming year.
We are founding members of, and contribute significant resources to, the Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility (responsibility.org), an organization created by spirits producers to prevent drunk driving and underage drinking and to promote responsible decision making. While this is a U.S. organization, we participate actively in similar organizations in other markets, such as DrinkWise in Australia, BSI in Germany, The Portman Group in the United Kingdom, and FISAC in Mexico. We also provide long-running support for alcohol education programs at the University of Louisville and the University of Kentucky (two major universities in the state of our corporate headquarters). In addition, through our corporate charitable contributions, we support organizations that offer treatment and recovery for those struggling with alcoholism and addiction. Our three anchor partners in Louisville, Kentucky, are The Healing Place, The Morton Center, and Volunteers of America Mid-States. In addition to our financial contributions, we support these organizations by having Brown-Forman employees serve on their boards of directors.
Environmental Sustainability. We view environmental sustainability as integral to our strategy to perpetuate Brown-Forman and “Build Forever.” Our environmental sustainability strategy aims to protect and conserve the resources we depend on. It also reinforces our business strategy through programs that reduce costs through efficiency, lessen risks to our operations, and improve effectiveness through innovation. We invest in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and efficient transportation to reduce our carbon footprint. In 2018, we executed a 15-year power purchase agreement for environmental attributes associated with the energy output from a wind farm facility located in Kansas. The wind farm is expected to generate the equivalent of more than 90% of Brown-Forman’s annual electricity use in the United States.
Mindful of our overall impact, in fiscal 2014, we set ambitious environmental sustainability goals for fiscal 2023: reducing our absolute greenhouse gas emissions by 15% and reducing our water use and wastewater discharges per unit of product by 30% (compared to metrics in 2012). In addition, we set a goal of sending zero waste to landfills by 2020. These goals support our ambition to grow our brands and our company responsibly while protecting and enriching the natural environment. We have refreshed our strategy to include a greater focus beyond our operational borders into our supply chain. We report on our progress toward these goals in our biennial Corporate Responsibility Reports, available on our corporate website.
Diversity, Inclusion, and Human Rights. We believe that having a diverse and inclusive workforce is central to our success. As we work to increase our brands’ relevance and appeal to diverse consumer groups, we need a diversity of experiences and outlooks within our own workforce. We also want employees to feel comfortable in contributing their whole selves and different perspectives to their work. Over the past few years, we have made progress with diverse representation at the senior level. Four

women and one African American serve on our Board of Directors. Three members of our 13-member Executive Leadership Team are women and two are minorities. In 2018, we once again earned a perfect score of 100% in the Corporate Equality Index, a national benchmarking survey and report on corporate policies and practices related to LGBTQ workplace equality administered by the Human Rights Campaign. This makes us one of the “Best Places to Work for LGBTQ equality”1 in the United States for
the eighth consecutive year. Our Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) have been the core of our diversity culture by supporting employees’ growth while enhancing their contributions. Our eight ERGs foster a diverse, inclusive environment that drives our high-commitment, high-performance organization and encourages our employees to bring their individuality to work. Our commitment to diversity extends to our partnerships with small and diverse suppliers. By 2020, our goal is to source at least 16% of our procurement from businesses owned by ethnic minorities, women, LGBTQ persons, people with disabilities, and veterans. To date, we have procured approximately 11% of our supplies from such businesses.
In the marketplace, we focus on promoting fair, ethical business practices. We remain committed to the guidelines set forth in our Global Human Rights Statement, defining our commitment to respecting the fundamental rights of all human beings. Our work in this area helped inform our response to the U.K.’s passage of the Modern Slavery Act in 2015, which is available on our corporate website.
Community Involvement. Our approach to philanthropy reflects our values as a corporate citizen. Brown-Forman believes, as a responsible and caring corporate citizen, it is vital that we give back to the communities that support both our employees and our business by thoughtfully deploying our time, talent, and resources. We collaborate with a variety of mission-driven organizations focused on enhancing intellectual and cultural living, ensuring essential living standards, and empowering responsible and sustainable living. While we focus on our hometown of Louisville, Kentucky, our civic engagement activities extend to the communities around the globe where our employees work, live, and raise their families.
In fiscal 2018, we donated approximately $11 million, logged approximately 17,000 volunteer hours, and had 123 employees serve on boards of directors of 196 non-profit organizations. In addition, with the goal of helping fund our ongoing philanthropic endeavors in the communities where our employees live and work, we created the Brown-Forman Foundation with a contribution of $70 million in fiscal 2018. We anticipate that the Brown-Forman Foundation’s proceeds will provide a consistent amount of revenue per year for its charitable giving program independent of our yearly earnings.
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. We reviewed our corporate responsibility strategy against the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, a set of 17 global goals designed to address a broad range of sustainable development issues from climate change to poverty and gender equality. Our review on where our work aligns with these goals is available in our 2017-2018 Corporate Responsibility Report (www.brown-forman.com/responsibility).













1Human Rights Campaign 2018 Corporate Equity Index at www.hrc.org/cei


Employees and Executive Officers
As of April 30, 2018,2020, we employed approximately 4,800 people worldwide (2,700(approximately 2,600 in the United States), including about 230 employedexcluding individuals that work on a part-time or temporary basis. ApproximatelyThis includes approximately 14% of our U.S. employees that are represented by a union. We believe our employee relations are good.
Information About Our Executive Officers
The following persons serveserved as executive officers as of June 13, 2018:19, 2020:
NameAgePrincipal Occupation and Business Experience
Paul C. VargaLawson E. Whiting5451Company ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer since 2007. Chief Executive Officer since 2005. On May 29, 2018, we announced Paul C. Varga’s decision to retire, effective December 31, 2018. The Board of Directors unanimously approved Lawson E. Whiting to succeed Mr. Varga as Chief Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2019. Mr. Varga will remain on the Board of Directors of the Company and is expected to stand for re-election at the upcoming Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on July 26, 2018.
Jane C. Morreau59Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2014. Senior Vice President, Chief Production Officer, and Head of Information Technology from 2013 to 2014. Senior Vice President and Director of Financial Management, Accounting, and Technology from 2008 to 2013.
Matthew E. Hamel58Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary since 2007.
Mark I. McCallum63Executive Vice President and Chief Brands Officer since June 2018. Executive Vice President and President of Jack Daniel’s Brands from February 2015 to June 2018. Executive Vice President and President for Europe, Africa, Middle East, Asia Pacific, and Travel Retail from 2013 to 2015. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 2009October 2017 to 2013. Executive Vice President and Chief Brands Officer from 2006 to 2009.
Lawson E. Whiting49Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2017.December 2018. Executive Vice President and Chief Brands and Strategy Officer from February 2015 to September 2017. Senior Vice President and Chief Brands Officer from 2013 to 2015. Senior Vice President and Managing Director for Western Europe from 2011 to 2013. Vice President and Finance Director for Western Europe from 2010 to 2011. Vice President and Finance Director for North America from 2009 to 2010. On May 29, 2018, we announced that the Board
Jane C. Morreau61Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2014. Senior Vice President, Chief Production Officer, and Head of Directors unanimously approved LawsonInformation Technology from 2013 to 2014. Senior Vice President and Director of Financial Management, Accounting, and Technology from 2008 to 2013.
Matthew E. Whiting to succeed Paul C. Varga as Chief Hamel60Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2019.Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since 2007.
Alejandro “Alex” Alvarez5052Senior Vice President, and Chief Production and Sustainability Officer since 2014. Vice President and General Manager for Brown-Forman Tequila Mexico Operations from 2008 to 2014.
Ralph De ChabertMatias Bentel7145
Senior Vice President and Chief DiversityBrands Officer since 2007.January 2020. Senior Vice President and Managing Director of Jack Daniel’s Family of Brands from August 2018 to January 2020. Vice President and General Manager of Mexico from January 2016 to August 2018. Vice President Latin America Marketing and Chief of Staff from October 2009 to January 2016.

Brian P. FitzgeraldKelli N. Brown4550Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since 2013.August 2018. Vice President and Director Finance (North America Region) from 2015 to August 2018. Director for Greater EuropeNAR Division Finance (North America Region) from 2013 to 2015. Director Business Planning and AfricaAnalytics (North America Region) from 20092012 to 2013.
Ralph E. de Chabert73Senior Vice President, Chief Diversity Inclusion and Global Community Relations Officer since March 2019. Senior Vice President and Chief Diversity Officer from December 2007 to February 2019.
Kirsten M. Hawley4850Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Corporate Communications Officer since March 2019. Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer sincefrom February 2015.2015 to February 2019. Senior Vice President and Director of HRHuman Resources Business Partnerships from 2013 to 2015. Vice President and Director of Organization and Leader Development from 2011 to 2013. Assistant Vice President and Director of Employee Engagement from 2009 to 2011.
John V. Hayes5860Senior Vice President, President, U.S.A. and Canada since June 2018. Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer of B-FBrown-Forman Brands from February 2015 to June 2018. Senior Vice President, Managing Director Jack Daniel’s from 2011 to 2015. Senior Vice President, Managing Director Herradura from 2007 to 2011.
Thomas Hinrichs5658Senior Vice President, President, International Division since June 2018. Senior Vice President and President for Europe, North Asia, and ANZSEA from February 2015 to June 2018. Senior Vice President and Managing Director for Europe from 2013 to 2015. Senior Vice President and Managing Director for Greater Europe and Africa from 2006 to 2013.
Mike Keyes57Senior Vice President, Chief Corporate Affairs Officer since June 2018. Senior Vice President, North America Region from May 2009 to June 2018.
Lisa P. Steiner58Senior Vice President, Chief of Staff, and Director of Global Corporate Communications and Services since February 2015. Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer from 2009 to 2015. Senior Vice President and Director of Global Human Resources from 2007 to 2009.
Available Information
You can read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC in its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

Our website address is www.brown-forman.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports are available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those reports with the SEC.Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information provided on our website is not part of this report, and is therefore not incorporated by reference into this report or any other filing we make with the SEC, unless that information is otherwise specifically referenced elsewhere in this report.incorporated by reference.
On our website, we have posted our Code of Conduct that applies to all our directors and employees, and our Code of Ethics that applies specifically to our senior financial officers. If we amend or waive any of the provisions of our Code of Conduct or our Code of Ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or principal accounting officer that relates to any element of the definition of “code of ethics” enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1934 Act, as amended, we intend to disclose these actions on our website. We have also posted on our website our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and

Nominating Committee, and Executive Committee of our Board of Directors. Copies of these materials are also available free of charge by writing to our Secretary, Matthew E. Hamel, 850 Dixie Highway, Louisville, Kentucky 40210 or emailing him at Secretary@b-f.com.
Item 1A. Risk Factors

We believe the following discussion identifies the most significant risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business. If any of the following risks were actually to occur, our business, results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. Additional risks not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, could also materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

Unfavorable economic conditionsOur business faces various risks related to health epidemics and pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic and similar outbreaks, which could negatively affect our operationsmaterially and results.

Unfavorable global or regional economic conditions, including uncertainty caused by unstable geopolitical environments in many parts of the world, could adversely affect our business, our operations, our cash flows, and our financial results.
Our business, operations, cash flows, and financial results. While the majorresults could be negatively impacted by health epidemics, pandemics, and similar outbreaks. The COVID-19 pandemic could have negative impacts, such as (i) a global or U.S. recession or other economic disruptions of the most recent financial crisis have largely subsided, manycrisis; (ii) credit and capital markets wherevolatility (and access to these markets, including by our suppliers and customers); (iii) significant volatility in demand for our products, are sold still face significant economic challenges resulting from the global economic downturn that followed, including low consumer confidence, high unemployment, budget deficits, burdensome governmental debt, austerity measures, increased taxes, and weak financial, credit, and housing markets. Unfavorable economic conditions such as these can cause governments to increase taxes on beverage alcohol to attempt to raise revenue, reducing consumers’ willingness to make discretionary purchases of beverage alcohol products or pay for premium brands such as ours. In unfavorable economic conditions, consumers may make more value-driven and price-sensitive purchasing choices and drink more at home rather than at restaurants, bars, and hotels, which tend to favor many of our premium and super-premium products.
Unfavorable economic conditions could also adversely affectproducts; (iv) changes in accessibility to our suppliers, distributors,products due to illness, quarantines, “stay at home” orders, travel restrictions, retail, restaurant, bar, and retailers, who in turn could experience cash flow problems, more costly or unavailable financing, credit defaults,hotel closures, social distancing requirements, and other government action; (v) changes in behavior and preferences, including trading down to lower-priced products; and (vi) disruptions in our manufacturing operations, or in our distribution and supply chain. Furthermore, we have been impacted in markets where, in connection with other government actions taken to slow the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, liquor sales have been restricted or banned outright such as in the state of Pennsylvania in the United States, and in South Africa, India, and other Asian countries. In addition, we may incur increased costs and otherwise be negatively affected if a significant portion of our workforce (or the workforces within our distribution or supply chain) is unable to work or work effectively, including because of illness, unavailability of personal protective equipment, quarantines, “stay at home” orders, social distancing requirements, other government action, facility closures, or other restrictions.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic depends on factors beyond our knowledge or control, including the duration and severity of the outbreak and actions taken to contain its spread and mitigate the public health effects and its short- and long-term impacts on the economy, unemployment, consumer confidence, and the financial hardships. This could lead to distributor or retailer destocking, disruption in raw material supply, increasehealth of our bad debt expense, or cause us to increasedistributors, customers, and suppliers. At this time, we cannot predict with certainty the levelsimpact of unsecured credit that we provide to customers. Other potential negative consequences tothe COVID-19 pandemic on our business from poor economic conditions include higher interest rates, an increase inor our future financial or operational results; however, the rate of inflation, deflation, exchange rate fluctuations, credit or capital market instability, or lower returns on pension assets or lower discount rates for pension obligations (possibly requiring higher contributions to our pension plans).impact could be material over time. For detailsfurther discussion on the effectsimpact of changes in the value of our benefit plan obligations and assetsCOVID-19 pandemic on our business and financial results, see Note 8 to the Consolidated“Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial StatementsCondition and Supplementary Data.Results of Operations - Significant Developments - COVID-19.

Our global business is subject to commercial, political, and financial risks, including foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

risks.
Our products are sold in more than 170 countries; accordingly, we are subject to risks associated with doing business globally, including commercial, political, and financial risks. In the long term, we continue to expect our growth rates in emerging markets, such as eastern Europe, Latin America, Asia, and Africa, to surpass our growth rates in the United States and more developed markets, such as the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Australia. However, we still expect our international developed markets to provide growth opportunities for us. If shipments of our products – particularly Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey – to our global markets were to experience significant disruption due to these risks or for other reasons, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. For example, Russia has enacted legislation that empowers its president to implement a partial or total ban on the importation of goods and products from and produced by companies under the jurisdiction of the United States and other “unfriendly” foreign countries. If such legislation were to be implemented, the sale of our products in Russia, especially Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey, could be significantly and adversely affected.

In addition, we are subject to potential business disruption caused by military conflicts; potentially unstable governments or legal systems; civil or political upheaval or unrest; local labor policies and conditions; possible expropriation, nationalization, or confiscation of assets; problems with repatriation of foreign earnings; economic or trade sanctions; closure of markets to imports; anti-American sentiment; terrorism or other types of violence in or outside the United States; and health pandemics; andpandemics (such as COVID-19). If shipments of our products - particularly Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey - to our global markets were to experience significant disruption due to these risks or for other reasons, it could have a significant reduction in global travel. material adverse effect on our financial results.
For example, in 2018, the United States recently imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum. In response, Mexico hasa number of countries imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports, including on our American whiskey products. The European UnionSuch retaliatory tariffs, which remain in place, have negatively affected our results of operations through lower net sales and severalhigher cost of sales. Any further deterioration of economic relations between the United States and other countries have threatenedor any increase in tariffs, custom duties or other restrictions or barriers on imports and exports could result in the limited availability of our products and prompt consumers to follow suit. If implemented, these tariffs couldseek alternative products or in an increase in the price of our products and to the extent that we absorb the costs of tariffs, result in these countries and could prompt consumers to seek alternative products.lower net sales or higher costs of sales. For example, the European Union plans the doubling of current retaliatory tariffs by June 2021 if there is no resolution of the economic relations with the United States. Furthermore, uncertainty related to the future of the European Union may affect our business and financial performance in Europe. For instance, in June 2016,On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom voted by referendum to leaveleft the European Union (Brexit), and, until a trade deal between the United Kingdom’s exit fromKingdom and the European Union is finalized, there may be a period ofwe face economic and political uncertainty related to the negotiation of any such successor trading arrangement with other countries as well as volatility in exchange rates, risk to supply chains across the European Union, restrictions on the mobility of employees and consumers, or changes to customs duties, tariffs, or industry specific requirements and regulations. In addition, any new trade barriers, sanctions, tariffs, or any

retaliatory measures in response to the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our operations. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to overcome the challenges we encounter with respect to these risks and other factors affecting U.S. companies with global operations.
A failure to comply with anti-corruption laws, trade sanctions and restrictions, or similar laws or regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
We are a global company that markets and sells our products in over 170 countries. Some of the countries where we do business have a higher risk of corruption than others. While we are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption laws, trade sanctions and restrictions, and other similar laws and regulations, along with our Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and our other policies, we remain subject to the risk that an employee, or one of our many business partners, may take action determined to be in violation of international trade, money laundering, anti-corruption, or other laws, sanctions, or regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, or equivalent local laws. Because the COVID-19 pandemic has so negatively impacted local economies, government intervention in local economies and businesses has increased, which in turn can create elevated risk and opportunity for corruption. Any determination that our operations or activities are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, particularly those related to anti-corruption and international trade, could result in investigations, interruption of business, loss of business partner relationships, suspension or termination of licenses and permits (our own or those of our partners), imposition of fines, legal or equitable sanctions, negative publicity, and management distraction. Further, our continued compliance with applicable anti-corruption or other laws or regulations, our Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and our other policies could result in higher operating costs.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
The more we expand our business globally, the more foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar influence our financial results. In many markets outside the United States, we sell our products and pay for some goods, services, and labortalent primarily in local currencies. Because our foreign currency revenues exceed our foreign currency expense, we have a net exposure to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to those currencies. Over time, our reported financial results generally will be hurt by a stronger U.S. dollar and improved by a weaker one. We do not attempt to hedge all of our foreign currency exposure. We may, from time to time, attempt to hedge a portion of our foreign currency exposure through the use of foreign currency derivatives or other means; however, even in those cases, we may not succeed in fully eliminating our foreign currency exposure. For details on how foreign exchange affects our business, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk - Foreign Exchange.currency exchange rate risk.

National and local governments may adopt regulations or undertake investigations that could limit our business activities or increase our costs.

Our business is subject to extensive regulatory requirements regarding production, exportation, importation, marketing and promotion, labeling, distribution, pricing, and trade practices, among others. Changes in laws, regulatory measures, or governmental policies, or the manner in which current ones are interpreted, could cause us to incur material additional costs or liabilities, and jeopardize the growth of our business in the affected market. Specifically, governments may prohibit, impose, or increase limitations on advertising and promotional activities, or times or locations where beverage alcohol may be sold or consumed, or adopt other measures that could limit our opportunities to reach consumers or sell our products. Certain countries historically have banned all television, newspaper, magazine, and internet digital commerce/advertising for beverage alcohol products. Increases in regulation of this nature could substantially reduce consumer awareness of our products in the affected markets and make the introduction of new products more challenging.
Some countries where we do business have a higher risk of corruption than others. While we are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption and other laws, our Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and our other policies, we remain subject to the risk that an employee will violate our policies, or that any of our many affiliates or agents, such as importers, wholesalers, distributors, or other business partners, may take action determined to be in violation of international trade, money laundering, anti-corruption, or other laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, or equivalent local laws. Any determination that our operations or activities are not, or were not, in compliance with U.S. or foreign laws or regulations could result in investigations, interruption of business, loss of business partner relationships, suspension or termination of licenses and permits (our own or those of our partners), imposition of fines, legal or equitable sanctions, negative publicity, and management distraction. Further, our compliance with applicable anti-corruption or other laws, our Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and our other policies could result in higher operating costs.
Additional regulation in the United States and other countries addressing climate change, use of water, and other environmental issues could increase our operating costs. Increasing regulation of fuel emissions could increase the cost of energy, including fuel, required to operate our facilities or transport and distribute our products, thereby substantially increasing the production, distribution, and supply chain costs associated with our products.

Unfavorable economic conditions could negatively affect our operations and results.

Unfavorable global or regional economic conditions could adversely affect our business and financial results. In particular, a significant deterioration in economic conditions, due to the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise, including economic slowdowns or recessions, increased unemployment levels, inflationary pressures and/or disruptions to credit and capital markets, could lead to decreased consumer confidence and consumer spending more generally, thus reducing consumer demand for our products. Unfavorable economic conditions could also cause governments to increase taxes on beverage alcohol to attempt to raise revenue,



reducing consumers’ willingness to make discretionary purchases of beverage alcohol products or pay for premium brands such as ours. In unfavorable economic conditions, such as those reflected in the current unprecedented levels of unemployment in the United States, consumers may make more value-driven and price-sensitive purchasing choices and drink more at home rather than at restaurants, bars, and hotels, which tend to favor many of our premium and super-premium products, which negatively impacts our operating margins.

Unfavorable economic conditions could also adversely affect our suppliers, distributors, and retailers, who in turn could experience cash flow problems, more costly or unavailable financing, credit defaults, and other financial hardships. For example, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and its resulting economic impact, we have received requests for credit extensions from some of our distributors as the financial health of such distributors may have been negatively impacted. This could lead to distributor or retailer destocking, disruption in raw material supply, increase in bad debt expense, or cause us to increase the levels of unsecured credit that we provide to customers. Other potential negative consequences to our business from unfavorable economic conditions include higher interest rates, an increase in the rate of inflation, deflation, exchange rate fluctuations, credit or capital market instability, or lower returns on pension assets or lower discount rates for pension obligations (possibly requiring higher contributions to our pension plans). For additional details on the effects of COVID-19 on our operations and financial results, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Significant Developments - COVID-19.”. For details on the effects of changes in the value of our benefit plan obligations and assets on our financial results, see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Tax increases and changes in tax rules could adversely affect our financial results.

Our business is sensitive to changes in both direct and indirect taxes. As a multinational company based in the United States, we are more exposed to the impact of U.S. tax changes than somemost of our major competitors, especially those that affect the effective corporate income tax rate.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act). The Tax Act significantly revises the U.S. corporate income tax by, among other things, lowering U.S. corporate income tax rates and implementing a territorial tax system. Shortly after the Tax Act was enacted, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (SAB 118) to address the application of GAAP. SAB 118 directs taxpayers to consider the impact of the Tax Act as provisional when a company does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for the change in tax law. In accordance with SAB 118, we have recognized the provisional tax impacts related to the repatriation tax and the re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities. However, many aspects of the Tax Act are still unclear and may not be clarified for some time. Ultimately, the actual impact of the Tax Act may differ from our provisional estimates, possibly materially, due to, among other things, the significant complexity of the Tax Act, anticipated additional regulatory guidance, or related interpretations that may be issued by the Internal Revenue Service, changes in accounting standards, legislative actions, future actions by states within the U.S. and changes in estimates, analyses, interpretations, and assumptions we have made.
New tax rules, accounting standards, or pronouncements, and changes in interpretation of existing rules, standards, or pronouncements could also have a significantmaterial adverse effect on our business and financial results. This includes potential changes in tax rules or the interpretation of tax rules arising out of the Base Erosion & Profit Shifting project initiated by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, as well as changes in the interpretation of tax rules arising out of the European Union State Aid investigations.
Our business operations are also subject to numerous duties or taxes that are not based on income, sometimes referred to as “indirect taxes.” These indirect taxes include excise taxes, sales or value-added taxes, property taxes, payroll taxes, import and export duties, and tariffs. Increases in or the imposition of new indirect taxes on our operations or products would increase the cost of our products or, to the extent levied directly on consumers, make our products less affordable, which could negatively affect our financial results by reducing purchases of our products and encouraging consumers to switch to lower-priced or lower-taxed product categories. As governmental entities look for increased sources of revenue, they may increase taxes on beverage alcohol products. For example, in 2017, the United Kingdom increased its tax on beer, cider, wine, and spirits by 3.9%, providing a potential source of revenue to fund its post-Brexit obligations. In 2018,fiscal 2020, we have observed excise tax increases in Australia, France,Poland, and Turkey.
In addition to indirect taxes, our global business can also be negatively affected by trade barriers and other governmental protectionist measures, any of which can be imposed suddenly and unpredictably. Recently, retaliatory tariffs have been imposed by Mexico and threatened by the European Union, Canada, Russia, China, and several other countries following the imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum by the United States. Mexico’s new tariffs on bourbon, and tariffs typically, take the form of value-added levies on U.S.-sourced products. As an example, a tariff on American whiskey would result in either reduced margins or increased consumer prices, either of which could adversely impact our financial results and demand for our products.

Czech Republic.
Our business performance is substantially dependent upon the continued health of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands.

The Jack Daniel’s family of brands is the primary driver of our revenue and growth. Jack Daniel’s is an iconic global trademark with a loyal consumer fan base, and we invest much effort and many resources to protect and preserve the brand’s reputation for quality,authenticity, craftsmanship, and authenticity.quality. A brand’s reputational value is based in large part on consumer perceptions, and even an isolated incident that causes harm - particularly one resulting in widespread negative publicity - could adversely influence these perceptions and erode consumer trust and confidence in the brand. Significant damage to the brand equity of Jack Daniel’s would adversely affect our business. Given the importance of Jack Daniel’s to our overall success, a significant or sustained decline in volume or selling price of our Jack Daniel’s products, as a result of negative publicity or otherwise, would have a negative effect on our growth and our stock price.financial results. Additionally, should we not be successful in our efforts to maintain or increase the relevance of the Jack Daniel’s brand in the minds ofto current and future consumers, our business and operating results could suffer. For details on the importance of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands to our business, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations - Fiscal 20182020 Brand Highlights.”





Changes in consumer preferences and purchases, andany decline in the social acceptability of our abilityproducts, or governmental adoption of policies disadvantageous to anticipate or react to them,beverage alcohol could negatively affect our business results.

We are a branded consumer products company in a highly competitive market, and our success depends substantially on our continued ability to offer consumers appealing, high-quality products. Consumer preferences and purchases may shift, often in unpredictable ways, due to a host ofseveral factors, including health and wellness trends; changes in economic conditions, demographic,

and social trends; public health policies and initiatives; changes in government regulation of beverage alcohol products; concerns or regulations related to product safety; legalization of marijuana use on a more widespread basis within the United States, Canada, or elsewhere; and changes in trends related to travel, leisure, dining, gifting, entertaining, and beverage consumption trends. Consumers may begin to shift their consumption and purchases of our premium and super-premium products, more commonly found in on-premise establishments, in favor of off-premise purchases or away from alcoholic beverages entirely. This includes consumption at home as a result of various factors, including shifts in social trends, proliferation of smoking bans, and stricter laws relating to driving while under the influence of alcohol, as well as shifts to purchases of our products to e-commerce retailers. ShiftsThese shifts in consumption and purchasing channels, such as thesewhich could adversely impact our profitability.profitability, have accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting quarantines, “stay at home” orders, travel restrictions, retail, restaurant, bar, and hotel closures, social distancing requirements, and other government action. Consumers also may begin to prefer the products of competitors or may generally reduce their demand for brands produced by larger companies. Over the past several years, the number of small, local distilleries in the United States has grown significantly. This is being driven by a trend of consumers showing increasing interest in locally produced, regionally sourced products. As many more competitive brands enter the market, itincreased competition could have a negative impact on thenegatively affect demand for our premium and super-premium American whiskey brands, including Jack Daniel’s. In addition, we could experience unfavorable business results if we fail to attract consumers from diverse backgrounds and ethnicities in the United States and inall markets where we sell our non-U.S. markets. Demographic forecasts in the United States for the next couple of years after 2018 indicate a slight decrease in the population segment aged 21 to 24; fewer potential consumers in this age bracket could have a negative effect on industry growth rates and on our business.products. To continue to succeed, we must anticipate or react effectively to shifts in demographics, consumer behavior, consumer preferences, drinking tastes, and drinking occasions.
Our long-term plans call for the continued growth of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands. In particular, we plan to continue to grow Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honeyexpand sales globally and to further expand our launch of Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye in additional international markets such as the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Canada in fiscal 2019.Apple internationally. If these plans do not succeed, or if we otherwise fail to develop or implement effective business, portfolio, and brand strategies, our growth, stock price,business, or financial results could suffer. More broadly, if consumers shift away from spirits (particularly brown spirits such as American whiskey and bourbon), our premium-priced brands, or our RTD products, our financial results could be adversely affected.
We believe that new products, line extensions, label and bottle changes, product reformulations, and similar product innovations by both our competitors and us will compete increasingly for consumer drinking occasions. Product innovation, particularly for our core brands, such as our launch of Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye,Apple, is a significant element of our growth strategy; however, there can be no assurance that we will continue to develop and implement successful line extensions, packaging, formulation or flavor changes, or new products. Unsuccessful implementation or short-lived popularity of our product innovations could result in inventory write-offs and other costs, reduction in profits from one year to the next, and also could damage consumers’ perception of the brand family. Our inability to attract consumers to our product innovations relative to our competitors’ products - especially over time - could negatively affect our growth, business, and financial results.

Our ability to market and sell our products depends heavily on societal attitudes toward drinking and governmental policies that both flow from and affect those attitudes. In recent years, increased social and political attention has been directed at the beverage alcohol industry. For example, there remains continued attention focused largely on public health concerns related to alcohol abuse, including drunk driving, underage drinking, and the negative health impacts of the abuse and misuse of beverage alcohol. While most people who drink enjoy alcoholic beverages in moderation, it is commonly known and well reported that excessive levels or inappropriate patterns of drinking can lead to increased risk of a range of health conditions and, for certain people, can result in alcohol dependence. Some academics, public health officials, and critics of the alcohol industry in the United States, Europe, and other parts of the world continue to seek governmental measures to make beverage alcohol more expensive, less available, or more difficult to advertise and promote. If future scientific research indicates more widespread serious health risks associated with alcohol consumption - particularly with moderate consumption - or if for any reason the social acceptability of beverage alcohol declines significantly, sales of our products could decrease.
Production facility disruption could adversely affect our business.

Some of our largest brands, including Jack Daniel’s, Finlandia Vodka, and our tequilas, are distilled at single locations. A catastrophic event causing physical damage, disruption, or failure at any one of our major distillation or bottling facilities, including facilities that support the production of our premium brands such as Woodford Reserve and Old Forester, could adversely affect our business. Further, because whiskeys and some tequilas are aged for various periods, we maintain a substantial inventory of aged and maturing products in warehouses at a number of different sites. The loss of a substantial amount of aged inventory - through fire, other natural or man-made disaster, contamination, or otherwise - could significantly reduce the supply of the affected product or products. A consequence of any of these or other supply or supply chain disruptions, including the temporary inability to produce our products due to the closure or lower production levels at one or more of our major distillation or bottling facilities, or at our suppliers as a result of COVID-19, could prevent us from meeting consumer demand for the affected products for a period of time.time in the near-term as well as in the long-term due to the nature of our aged products. In addition, insurance proceeds may be insufficient to cover the replacement value of our inventory of maturing products and other assets if they were to be lost. Disaster recovery plans may not prevent business disruption, and reconstruction of any damaged facilities could require a significant amount of time.time.


The inherent uncertainty in supply/demand forecasting could adversely affect our business, particularly with respect to our aged products.

There is an inherent risk of forecasting imprecision in determining the quantity of aged and maturing products to produce and hold in inventory in a given year for future sale. The forecasting strategies we use to balance product supply with fluctuations in consumer demand may not be effective for particular years or products. For example, in addition to our American, Canadian, and Irish whiskeys and some tequilas, which are aged for various periods, our acquisition of The GlenDronach, BenRiach, and

Glenglassaugh Scotch whisky brands and distilleries introduce a new category of inventory, whichincluding The GlenDronach, BenRiach, and Glenglassaugh require long-term maturation on average of 12 years with limited releases of 30 years or more, making forecasts of demand for such products in future periods subject to significant uncertainty. Factors that affect our ability to forecast accurately include changes in business strategy, market demand, consumer preferences, macroeconomic conditions, introductions of competing products, and other changes in market conditions.conditions such as the COVID-19 pandemic and its resulting economic impacts. Any forecasting error could lead to our inability to meet the objectives of our business strategy, failure to meet future demand, or lead to a future surplus of inventory and consequent write-down in value of maturing stocks.raw materials or finished goods. If we are unable to accurately forecast demand for our products or efficiently manage inventory, this may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. Further, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in using various levers, such as pricing changes, to create the desired balance of available supply and consumer demand for particular years or products. As a consequence, we may be unable to meet consumer demand for the affected products for a period of time. Furthermore, not having our products in the market on a consistent basis may adversely affect our brand equity and future sales.

Higher costs or unavailability of materials could adversely affect our financial results, as could our inability to obtain certain finished goods or to sell used materials.

Our products use materials and ingredients that we purchase from suppliers. Our ability to make and sell our products depends upon the availability of the raw materials, product ingredients, finished products, wood, glass and PET bottles, cans, bottle closures, packaging, and other materials used to produce and package them. Without sufficient quantities of one or more key materials, our business and financial results could suffer. For instance, only a few glass producers make bottles on a scale sufficient for our requirements, and a single producer supplies most of our glass requirements. In addition, if we were to experience a disruption in the supply of American white oak logs to produce the new charred oak barrels in which we age our whiskeys, our production capabilities would be compromised. If any of our key suppliers were no longer able to meet our timing, quality, or capacity requirements, ceased doing business with us, or significantly raised prices, and we could not promptly develop alternative cost-effective sources of supply or production, our operations and financial results could suffer. For example, in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, disruptions in our manufacturing operations or in our distribution or supply chain, such as with our neutral spirits supplier in France for our Jack Daniel’s flavored whiskies, due to illness, quarantines, “stay at home” orders, social distancing requirements, and other government actions could adversely affect our ability to manufacture our products.
Higher costs or insufficient availability of suitable grain, agave, water, grapes, wood, glass, closures, and other input materials, or higher associated labor costs or insufficient availability of labor, may adversely affect our financial results because we may not be able to pass along such cost increases or the cost of such shortages through higher prices to customers without reducing demand or sales.results. Similarly, when energy costs rise, our transportation, freight, and other operating costs, such as distilling and bottling expenses, also may increase. Our freight cost and the timely delivery of our products could be adversely impactedaffected by a number of factors whichthat could reduce the profitability of our operations, including driver shortages, higher fuel costs, weather conditions, traffic congestion, increased government regulation, and other matters. Our financial results may be adversely affected if we are not able to pass along energy and freight cost increases through higher prices to our customers without reducing demand or sales.
International or domestic geopolitical or other events, including the imposition of any tariffs or quotas by governmental authorities on any raw materials that we use in the production of our products, could adversely impactaffect the supply and cost of these raw materials to us. If we cannot offset higher raw material costs with higher selling prices, increased sales volume, or reductions in other costs, our profitability could be adversely affected.
Weather, the effects of climate change, fires, diseases, and other agricultural uncertainties that affect the mortality, health, yield, quality, or price of the various raw materials used in our products also present risks for our business, including in some cases potential impairment in the recorded value of our inventory. Changes in weather patterns or intensity can disrupt our supply chain as well, which may affect production operations, insurance costs and coverage, and the timely delivery of our products.
Water is an essential component of our products, so the quality and quantity of available water is important to our ability to operate our business. If droughts become more common or severe, or if our water supply were interrupted for other reasons, high-quality water could become scarce in some key production regions for our products, including Tennessee, Kentucky, California, Finland, Canada, Mexico, Scotland, and Ireland.Ireland, which in turn could adversely affect our business and financial results.

Our ability to sell used materialsbarrels for reuse may be affected by fluctuations in the market. For example, weaker demand from blended Scotch industry buyers, lower prices, and increased competitive supply of used barrels, and weaker demand from Irish and blended scotch industry buyers may make it difficult to sell our used barrels at sustainable prices and quantities, which could negatively affect our financial results.

If the social acceptability of our products declines, or governments adopt policies disadvantageous to beverage alcohol, our business could be adversely affected.

Our ability to market and sell our products depends heavily on societal attitudes toward drinking and governmental policies that both flow from and affect those attitudes. In recent years, increased social and political attention has been directed at the beverage alcohol industry. For example, there remains continued attention focused largely on public health concerns related to alcohol abuse, including drunk driving, underage drinking, and the negative health impacts of the abuse and misuse of beverage alcohol. While most people who drink enjoy alcoholic beverages in moderation, it is commonly known and well reported that

excessive levels or inappropriate patterns of drinking can lead to increased risk of a range of health conditions and, for certain people, can result in alcohol dependence. Some academics, public health officials, and critics of the alcohol industry in the United States, Europe, and other parts of the world continue to seek governmental measures to make beverage alcohol more expensive, less available, or more difficult to advertise and promote. Furthermore, health and wellness trends over the past several years may result in a shift in consumer preferences away from alcoholic beverages. If future scientific research indicated more widespread serious health risks associated with alcohol consumption – particularly with moderate consumption – or if for any reason the social acceptability of beverage alcohol were to decline significantly, sales of our products could decrease.

Significant additional labeling or warning requirements or limitations on the availability of our products could inhibit sales of affected products.

Various jurisdictions have adopted or may seek to adopt significant additional product labeling or warning requirements or limitations on the availability of our products relating to the content or perceived adverse health consequences of some of our products. Several such labeling regulations or laws require warnings on any product with substances that the statejurisdiction lists as potentially associated with cancer or birth defects. Our products already raise health and safety concerns for some regulators, and heightened requirements could be imposed. If additional or more severe requirements of this type are imposed on one or more of our major products under current or future health, environmental, or other laws or regulations, they could inhibit sales of such products. Further, we cannot predict whether our products will become subject to increased rules and regulations, which, if enacted, could increase our costs or adversely impact sales. For example, studies have been conductedadvocacy groups in Australia and the United Kingdom to considerhave called for the impactconsideration of requiring the sale of alcohol in plain packaging with more comprehensive health warnings in an effort to change drinking habits in those countries. These studies could result in additional governmental regulations concerning the production, marketing, labeling, or availability of our products, any of which could damage our reputation, makingmake our premium brands unrecognizable, or reduce demand of our products, which could adversely affect our profitability.

We face substantial competition in our industry, including many new entrants into spirits; and consolidation among beverage alcohol producers, wholesalers, and retailers, or changes to our route-to-consumer model, could hinder the marketing, sale, or distribution of our products.

We use different business models to market and distribute our products in different countries around the world. In the United States, we sell our products either to distributors for resale to retail outlets or e-commerce retailers or, in those states that control alcohol sales, to state governments who then sell them to retail customers and consumers. In our non-U.S. markets, we use a variety of route-to-consumer models - including, in many markets, reliance on others to market and sell our products. Consolidation among spirits producers, distributors, wholesalers, suppliers, or retailers and the increased growth and popularity of the e-commerce retail environment across the consumer product goods market, which has accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting quarantines, “stay at home” orders, travel restrictions, retail store closures, social distancing requirements, and other government action, could create a more challenging competitive landscape for our products. Consolidation at any level could hinder the distribution and sale of our products as a result of reduced attention and resources allocated to our brands both during and after transition periods, because our brands might represent a smaller portion of the new business portfolio. Furthermore, consolidation of distributors may lead to the erosion of margins as newly consolidated distributors take down prices. Changes in distributors’ strategies, including a reduction in the number of brands they carry, the allocation of shelf space for our competitors’ brands, or private label products, may adversely affect our sales, margin, outlook,growth, business, financial results, and market share. Expansion into new product categories by other suppliers, or innovation by new entrants into the market, could increase competition in our product categories. For example, we are experiencing increased competition for some of our products from new entrants in the small-batch or craft spirits category.
Changes to our route-to-consumer models or partners in important markets could result in temporary or longer-term sales disruption, could result in higher costs, and could negatively affect other business relationships we might have with that partner. Disruption of our distribution network or fluctuations in our product inventory levels at distributors, wholesalers, or retailers could negatively affect our results for a particular period. Further, while we believe we have sufficient scale to succeed relative to our major competitors, we nevertheless face a risk that continuing consolidation of large beverage alcohol companies could put us at a competitive disadvantage.
Our competitors may respond to industry and economic conditions more rapidly or effectively than we do. For example, we are facing an increasingly competitive pricing environment, and our competitors may have more flexibility to adjust to such challenges. Other suppliers, as well as wholesalers and retailers of our brands, offer products that compete directly with ours for shelf space, promotional displays, and consumer purchases. Pricing (including price promotions, discounting, couponing, and free goods), marketing, new product introductions, entry into our distribution networks, and other competitive behavior by other suppliers, and by wholesalers and traditional and e-commerce retailers, could adversely affect our sales, margins, andgrowth, business, and financial results. While we seek to take advantage of the efficiencies and opportunities that large retail customers can offer, they often seek lower pricing and purchase volume flexibility, offer competing own-labelprivate label products, and represent a large number of other competing products. If the buying power of these large retail customers continues to increase, it could negatively affect our financial results.

We might not succeed in our strategies for acquisitions and dispositions.

From time to time, we acquire or invest in additional brands or businesses. We expect to continue to seek acquisition and investment opportunities that we believe will increase long-term shareholder value, but we may not be able to find and purchase brands or

businesses at acceptable prices and terms. Acquisitions involve risks and uncertainties, including potential difficulties integrating acquired brands and personnel; the possible loss of key customers or employees most knowledgeable about the acquired business; implementing and maintaining consistent U.S. public company standards, controls, procedures, policies, and information systems; exposure to unknown liabilities; business disruption; and management distraction. Acquisitions, investments, or joint ventures could also lead us to incur additional debt and related interest expenses, issue additional shares, become exposed to contingent liabilities, and lead to dilutionresult in a reduction in our earnings per share and reduction ina decrease on our return on average invested capital. We could incur future restructuring charges or record impairment losses on the value of goodwill or other intangible assets resulting from previous acquisitions, which may also negatively affect our financial results.
We also evaluate from time to time the potential disposition of assets or businesses that may no longer meet our growth, return,financial or strategic objectives. In selling assets or businesses, we may not get prices or terms as favorable as we anticipated. We could also encounter difficulty in finding buyers on acceptable terms in a timely manner, which could delay our accomplishment of strategic objectives. Expected cost savings from reduced overhead relating to the sold assets may not materialize, and the overhead reductions could temporarily disrupt our other business operations. Any of these outcomes could negatively affect our financial results.

Counterfeiting or inadequate protection of our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business prospects.

Our brand names, trademarks, and related intellectual property rights are critical assets, and our business depends on our protecting them online and in the countries where we do business. We may not succeed in protecting our intellectual property rights in a given market or in challenging those who infringe our rights or imitate or counterfeit our products. Although we believe that our intellectual property rights are legally protected in the markets where we do business, the ability to register and enforce intellectual property rights varies from country to country. In some countries, for example, it may be more difficult to successfully stop counterfeiting or look-alike products, either because the law is inadequate or, even though satisfactory legal options may exist, it may be difficult to obtain and enforce sanctions against counterfeiters. We may not be able to register our trademarks in every country where we want to sell a particular product, and we may not obtain favorable decisions by courts or trademark offices.
Many global spirits brands, including some of our brands, experience problems with product counterfeiting and other forms of trademark infringement. We combat counterfeiting by working with other companies in the spirits industry through our membership in the International Federation ofAlliance Against Counterfeit Spirits Producers (IFSP)(AACS) and with brand owners in other industries via our membership in React, an anti-counterfeiting network organization. While we believe IFSPAACS and React are effective organizations, they are not active in every market, and their efforts are subject to obtaining the cooperation of local authorities and courts in the markets where they are active. Despite the efforts of IFSP,AACS, React, and our own teams, lower-quality and counterfeit products that could be harmful to consumers could reach the market and adversely affect our intellectual property rights, brand equity, corporate reputation, and financial results. In addition, the industry as a whole could suffer negative effects related to the manufacture, sale, and consumption of illegally produced beverage alcohol.

In connection with the COVID-19 pandemic and its resulting economic impacts, government actions and interventions in local economies and businesses may create an elevated risk and opportunity for counterfeiting.
Product recalls or other product liability claims could materially and adversely affect our sales.

The success of our brands depends upon the positive image that consumers have of those brands.them. We could decide to or be required to recall products due to suspected or confirmed product contamination, product tampering, spoilage, or other quality issues. Any of these events could adversely affect our sales.financial results. Actual contamination, whether deliberate or accidental, could lead to inferior product quality and even illness, injury, or death to consumers, potential liability claims, and material loss. Should a product recall become necessary, or we voluntarily recall a product in the event of contamination, damage, or other quality issue, sales of the affected product or our broader portfolio of brands could be adversely affected. A significant product liability judgment or widespread product recall may negatively impact sales and our business and financial results of the affected brand or brands.results. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, resulting negative publicity could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image.

Litigation and legal disputes could expose our business to financial and reputational risk.

Major private or governmental litigation challenging the production, marketing, promotion, distribution, or sale of beverage alcohol or specific brands could affect our ability to sell our products. Because litigation and other legal proceedings can be costly to defend, even actions that are ultimately decided in our favor could have a negative impact on our business reputation or financial results. Lawsuits have been brought against beverage alcohol companies alleging problems related to alcohol abuse, negative health consequences from drinking, problems from alleged marketing or sales practices, and underage drinking. While these

lawsuits have been largely unsuccessful in the past, others may succeed in the future. We could also experience employment-related class actions, environmental claims, commercial disputes, product liability actions stemming from a beverage or container

production defect, a whistleblower suit, or other major litigation that could adversely affect our business results, particularly if there is negative publicity or to the extent the losses or expenses were not covered by insurance.
Governmental actions around the world to enforce trade practice, anti-money-laundering, anti-corruption, competition, tax, environmental, and other laws are also a continuing compliance risk for global companies such as ours. In addition, as a U.S. public company, we are exposed to the risk of securities-related class action suits, particularly following a precipitous drop in the share price of our stock. Adverse developments in major lawsuits concerning these or other matters could result in management distraction and have a material adverse effect on our business.

business.
A cyber breach, or a failure or corruption of one or more of our key information technology systems, networks, processes, associated sites, or service providers, or a failure to comply with personal data protection laws could have a material adverse impact on our business.

We rely on information technology (IT) systems, networks, and services, including internet sites, data hosting and processing facilities and tools, hardware (including laptops and mobile devices), software, and technical applications and platforms, some of which are managed, hosted, provided, or used by third parties or their vendors, to help us manage our business. The various uses of these IT systems, networks, and services include, but are not limited to: hosting our internal network and communication systems; ordering and managing materials from suppliers; supply/demand planning; production; shipping products to customers; hosting corporate strategic plans and employee data; hosting our branded websites and marketing products to consumers; collecting and storing customer, consumer, employee, investor, and other data; processing transactions; summarizing and reporting results of operations; hosting, processing, and sharing confidential and proprietary research, business plans, and financial information; complying with regulatory, legal, or tax requirements; providing data security; and handling other processes necessary to manage our business.
Increased IT security threats and more sophisticated cyber crimescybercrimes and cyber attackscyberattacks pose a potential risk to the security and availability of our IT systems, networks, and services, including those that are managed, hosted, provided, or used by third parties, as well as the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of our data and the data of our customers, consumers, employees, and others. If the IT systems, networks, or service providers we rely upon fail to function properly, or if we suffer a loss or disclosure of our business strategy or other sensitive information, due to any number of causes, ranging from catastrophic events to power outages to security breaches to usage errors by employees and other security issues, we may suffer interruptions in our ability to manage operations and reputational, competitive, or business harm, which may adversely affect our business operations or financial results. In addition, such events could result in unauthorized disclosure of material confidential information, and we may suffer financial and reputational damage because of lost or misappropriated confidential information belonging to us or to our partners, our employees, customers, suppliers, or consumers. In any of these events, we could also be required to spend significant financial and other resources to remedy the damage caused by a security breach or to repair or replace networks and IT systems, which could require a significant amount of time. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, a greater number of our employees are working remotely, which may further increase our vulnerability to the cyber risks described above.

In the ordinary course of our business, we receive, process, transmit, and store information relating to identifiable individuals (personal data), primarily employees and former employees, but also relating to customers and consumers. As a result, we are subject to various U.S. federal and state and foreign laws and regulations relating to personal data. These laws have been subject to frequent changes, and new legislation in this area may be enacted in other jurisdictions at any time, such as, for example, the California Consumer Protection Act which took effect on January 1, 2020. In the European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) became effective in May 2018, for all member states and has extraterritorial effect. The GDPR includes operational requirements for companies receiving or processing personal data of European Union residents that are partially different from those that had previously been in place and includes significant penalties for noncompliance. The changes introduced by the GDPR, as well as any other changes to existing personal data protection laws and the introduction of such laws in other jurisdictions, have subjected and may continue in the future to subject us to, among other things, additional costs and expenses and have required and may in the future require costly changes to our business practices and security systems, policies, procedures, and practices. Improper disclosure of personal data in violation of the GDPR and/or of other personal data protection laws could harm our reputation, cause loss of consumer confidence, subject us to government enforcement actions (including fines), or result in private litigation against us, which could result in loss of revenue, increased costs, liability for monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution, all of which could negatively affect our business and operating results.
Negative publicity could affect our stock price and business performance.


Unfavorable publicity, whether accurate or not, related to our industry or to us or our products, brands, marketing, personnel,executive leadership, employees, board of directors, family stockholders, operations, business performance, or prospects could negatively affect our corporate reputation, stock price, ability to attract and retain high-quality talent, or the performance of our business.

Adverse publicity or negative commentary on social media outlets, whether valid or not, particularly any that go “viral,” could cause consumers to react by avoiding our brands or choosing brands offered by our competitors, which could materially negatively affect our financial results.

Our failure to attract or retain key executive or diverse employee talent could adversely affect our business.

Our success depends upon the efforts and abilities of our senior management team, other key employees, and our high-quality employee base, as well as our ability to attract, motivate, reward, and retain them. Difficulties in hiring or retaining key executive or other employee talent, or the unexpected loss of experienced employees resulting in the depletion of our institutional knowledge base, could have an adverse impact on our business performance, reputation, financial condition, or results of operations. Given the changing demographics, changes in immigration laws and policies, and increased demand for talent globally, we, as an American multinational company, may not be able to find the right people with the right skills, at the right time, and in the right location, to achieve our business objectives. Additionally, companies like ours face increased labor costs as a result of aggressive hiring and/or inflated levels of compensation offered by other employers, especially in emerging markets – notably, India and Asia.





The Brown family has the ability to control the outcome of matters submitted for stockholder approval.

We are a “controlled company” under New York Stock Exchange rules. Controlled companies are exempt from New York Stock Exchange listing standards that require a board composed of a majority of independent directors, a fully independent nominating/corporate governance committee, and a fully independent compensation committee. We avail ourselves of the exemptions from having a board composed of a majority of independent directors and a fully independent nominating/corporate governance committee. Notwithstanding the available exemption, our Compensation Committee is composed exclusively of independent directors. As a result of our use of some “controlled company” exemptions, our corporate governance practices differ from those of non-controlled companies, which are subject to all of the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance requirements.
We have two classes of common stock. Our Class A common stock is entitled to full voting powers, including in the elections of directors, while our Class B common stock may not vote except as provided by the laws of Delaware. We have had two classes of common stock since 1959, when our stockholders approved the issuance of two shares of Class B non-voting common stock to every holder of our voting common stock. Such dual classdual-class share structures have increasingly come under the scrutiny of major indices, institutional investors, and proxy advisory firms, with some calling for the reclassification of non-voting common stock.
A majority of our voting stock is controlled by members of the Brown family, and, collectively, they have the ability to control the outcome of stockholder votes, including the election of all of our directors and the approval or rejection of any merger, change of control, or other significant corporate transactions. We believe that having a long-term-focused, committed, and engaged shareholderstockholder base provides us with an important strategic advantage, particularly in a business with aged products and multi-generational brands. This advantage could be eroded or lost, however, should Brown family members cease, collectively, to be controlling stockholders of the Company.
We believe that it is in the interests of all shareholdersstockholders that we remain independent and family-controlled, and we believe the Brown family stockholders share these interests. Thus, our common stock dual classdual-class share structure, as it has existed since 1959, is perpetual, and we do not have a sunset provision in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation or By-laws that provides for the eventual reclassification of the non-voting common stock to voting common stock. However, the Brown family’s interests may not always be aligned with other stockholders’ interests. By exercising their control, the Brown family could cause the Company to take actions that are at odds with the investment goals or interests of institutional, short-term, non-voting, or other non-controlling investors, or that have a negative effect on our stock price. Further, because the Brown family controls the majority of our voting stock, Brown-Forman might be a less attractive takeover target, which could adversely affect the market price of both our voting and our non-voting common stock. And the difference in voting rights for our common stock could also adversely and disproportionately affect the value of our Class B non-voting common stock to the extent that investors view, or any potential future purchaser of our Company views, the superior voting rights and control represented by the Class A common stock to have value.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.


Item 2. Properties
Our company-owned production facilities include distilleries, a winery, a concentrate plant, bottling plants, warehousing operations, sawmills, cooperages, visitors’ centers, and cooperages.retail shops. We also have agreements with other parties for contract production in Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Latvia, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
In addition to our company-owned production locations and our corporate offices in Louisville, Kentucky, we lease office space for use in our sales, marketing, and administrative operations in the United States and in over 40 other cities around the globe. The lease terms expire at various dates and are generally renewable. Our most significant leased office locations outside Louisville are:
United States: Irving, Texas; Irvine, California; Baltimore, Maryland; Atlanta, Georgia; San Rafael, California; and Washington, D.C.
International: Guadalajara, Mexico; Hamburg, Germany; Moscow, Russia; Warsaw, Poland; Sydney, Australia; São Paulo, Brazil; Paris, France; Prague, Czechia; Amsterdam, Netherlands; London, United Kingdom; Barcelona, Spain; Mexico City, Mexico; Seoul, South Korea; Gurgaon, India; Istanbul, Turkey; Shanghai, China; Hong Kong; Cape Town, South Africa; Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Kiev, Ukraine; and Tokyo, Japan.
Significant Properties
LocationPrincipal ActivitiesNotes
   
United States:
Louisville, KentuckyCorporate officesIncludes several renovated historic structures
 Distilling, bottling, warehousingHome of Old Forester
 Visitors’ center 
 CooperageBrown-Forman Cooperage
Lynchburg, TennesseeDistilling, bottling, warehousingHome of Jack Daniel’s
 Visitors’ center 
Woodford County, KentuckyDistilling, bottling, warehousingHome of Woodford Reserve
 Visitors’ center 
Windsor, California
Vineyards, winery, bottling, warehousing
 
Home of Sonoma-Cutrer
 Visitors’ center 
Decatur,Trinity, AlabamaCooperageJack Daniel Cooperage
Clifton, TennesseeStave and heading mill 
Stevenson, AlabamaStave and heading mill 
Spencer, IndianaStave and heading mill 
Jackson, OhioStave and heading millLand is leased from a third party
   
International:
Collingwood, Canada1
Distilling, warehousing
Home of Canadian Mist1
Cour-Cheverny, FranceDistilling, bottling, warehousingHome of Chambord
Amatitán, MexicoDistilling, bottling, warehousingHome of our tequilas and New Mix RTDstequila brands
 Visitors’ center 
Slane, IrelandDistillingHome of Slane Irish Whiskey
 Visitors’ center 
Aberdeenshire, Scotland


Distilling, warehousingHome of Glendronach
 Visitors’ center 
Morayshire, Scotland


Distilling, warehousingHome of BenRiach
 Visitors’ center 
Newbridge, ScotlandBottling 
Portsoy, ScotlandDistilling, warehousingHome of Glenglassaugh
 Visitors’ center 
1Entered into an agreement on June 12, 2020 to sell this brand and its property to Sazerac Company.
We believe that our facilities are in good condition and are adequate for our business.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We operate in a litigious environment and we are sued in the normal course of business. We do not anticipate that any pending suits will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.


PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our Class A and Class B common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols “BFA” and “BFB,” respectively. As of May 31, 2018,2020, there were 2,6392,552 holders of record of Class A common stock and 5,4865,127 holders of record of Class B common stock. Because of overlapping ownership between classes, as of May 31, 2018,2020, we had only 5,4315,270 distinct common stockholders of record.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share for our Class A and Class B common stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite index, and dividend per share information:
  Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018
  First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 Year 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Year
Market price per share:                  
Class A high $43.42
 $43.56
 $39.46
 $40.04
 $43.56
 $42.75
 $42.62
 $51.30
 $55.67
 $55.67
Class A low 40.62
 37.60
 36.50
 37.09
 36.50
 35.50
 37.79
 41.14
 46.61
 35.50
Class B high 40.32
 40.85
 37.63
 39.16
 40.85
 45.54
 45.62
 55.66
 56.52
 56.52
Class B low 37.56
 35.73
 35.17
 36.01
 35.17
 37.82
 38.43
 44.08
 50.66
 37.82
Cash dividends per share:                  
Declared 0.272
 
 0.292
 
 0.564
 0.292
 
 1.316
 
 1.608
Paid 0.136
 0.136
 0.146
 0.146
 0.564
 0.146
 0.146
 0.158
 1.158
 1.608
Notes:
1. Amounts have been adjusted for a 5-for-4 stock split that occurred in February 2018.
2. Cash dividends for fiscal 2018 include a special dividend of $1.00 per share.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes information as of April 30, 2018,2020, about our equity compensation plans under which we have made grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, market value units, performance units, or other equity awards.
Plan CategoryPlan Category 
Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights1
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights2
 Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation PlansPlan Category 
Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights1
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights2
 Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity compensation plans approved by Class A common stockholdersEquity compensation plans approved by Class A common stockholders 3,365,537 $29.67 14,790,843Equity compensation plans approved by Class A common stockholders 2,438,446 $38.19 13,513,565
1Includes 2,971,1801,903,124 Class B common shares to be issued upon exercise of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs); 199,973132,877 Class B commonperformance-based restricted stock units (RSUs)(PBRSUs); 114,703156,274 Class A PBRSUs; 169,838 Class A common deferred stock units (DSUs); and 79,68176,333 Class B common DSUs issued under the Brown-Forman 2004 or 2013 Omnibus Compensation Plans. Does not include issued shares of performance-based restricted stock. SSARs are exercisable for an amount of our common stock with a value equal to the increase in the fair market value of the common stock from the date the SSARs were granted. The fair market value of our common stock at fiscal year-end has been used for the purposes of reporting the number of shares to be issued upon exercise of the 7,215,0104,929,581 SSARs outstanding at fiscal year-end.
2RSUs and DSUs have no exercise price because their value depends on continued employment or service over time, and are to be settled for shares of Class B common stock. Accordingly, these have been disregarded for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price.




Stock Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of our Class B common stock for the last five fiscal years with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, and the Dow Jones U.S. Food & Beverage Index. The information presented assumes an initial investment of $100 on April 30, 2013,2015, and that all dividends were reinvested. The cumulative returns shown representgraph shows the value that each of these investments would have had on April 30 in the years since 2013.2015.
chart-22d1c059d0ab52b0b26.jpgchart-32a1fa417faa522fa23.jpg




Item 6. Selected Financial Data
This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
2014201520162017201820162017201820192020
For Year Ended April 30:  
Sales$4,011
$3,857
$4,201
$4,276
$4,306
Excise taxes$922
$863
$953
$952
$943
Net sales$2,991
$3,134
$3,089
$2,994
$3,248
$3,089
$2,994
$3,248
$3,324
$3,363
Gross profit$2,078
$2,183
$2,144
$2,021
$2,202
$2,144
$2,021
$2,202
$2,166
$2,127
Operating income$971
$1,027
$1,533
$989
$1,039
$1,556
$1,010
$1,048
$1,144
$1,091
Net income$659
$684
$1,067
$669
$717
$1,067
$669
$717
$835
$827
Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per share 
Weighted average shares (in millions) used to calculate earnings per share 
– Basic533.6
529.0
507.4
484.6
480.3
507.4
484.6
480.3
479.0
477.8
– Diluted537.7
532.7
510.7
488.1
484.2
510.7
488.1
484.2
482.1
480.4
Earnings per share from continuing operations  
– Basic$1.23
$1.29
$2.10
$1.38
$1.49
$2.10
$1.38
$1.49
$1.74
$1.73
– Diluted$1.22
$1.28
$2.09
$1.37
$1.48
$2.09
$1.37
$1.48
$1.73
$1.72
Gross margin69.5%69.7%69.4%67.5%67.8%69.4%67.5%67.8%65.2%63.2%
Operating margin32.5%32.8%49.6%33.0%32.0%50.4%33.8%32.3%34.4%32.4%
Effective tax rate30.5%31.7%28.3%28.3%26.6%28.3%28.3%26.6%19.8%18.0%
Average invested capital$3,131
$3,196
$3,221
$3,591
$3,832
$3,221
$3,591
$3,832
$4,125
$4,387
Return on average invested capital21.6%22.0%34.1%19.8%20.0%34.1%19.8%20.0%22.0%20.4%
Cash flow from operations$649
$608
$524
$639
$632
Cash provided by operations$545
$656
$653
$800
$724
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.436
$0.484
$0.524
$0.564
$1.608
$0.5240
$0.5640
$1.6080
$0.6480
$0.6806
Dividend payout ratio35.3%37.5%25.0%40.9%107.8%25.0%40.9%107.8%37.2%39.3%
As of April 30:  
Total assets$4,103
$4,188
$4,183
$4,625
$4,976
$4,183
$4,625
$4,976
$5,139
$5,766
Long-term debt$997
$743
$1,230
$1,689
$2,341
$1,230
$1,689
$2,341
$2,290
$2,269
Total debt$1,005
$1,183
$1,501
$2,149
$2,556
$1,501
$2,149
$2,556
$2,440
$2,602
  
Notes:
1.Includes the results of Southern Comfort and Tuaca, both of which were sold in March 2016 at a gain of $485 million (pre-tax). Includes the results of BenRiach since its acquisition in June 2016.
2.Weighted average shares, earnings per share, and cash dividends declared per common share have been adjusted for a 2-for-1 stock split in August 2016 and a 5-for-4 stock split in February 2018.
3.See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Presentation Basis – Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for details on our use of “return on average invested capital,” including how we calculate this measure and why we think this information is useful to readers.
4.Cash dividends declared per common share include a special cash dividend of $1.00 in fiscal 2018.
5.We define dividend payout ratio as cash dividends divided by net income.


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to help the reader better understand Brown-Forman, our operations, our financial results, and our current business environment. Please read this MD&A in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” (the Consolidated Financial Statements). All share and per share amounts have been adjusted for a 5-for-4 stock split in February 2018 (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information).
Our MD&A is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
 Page
Presentation basis. This MD&A reflects the basis of presentation described in Note 1 “Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, we define statistical and non-GAAP financial measures that we believe help readers understand our results of operations and the trends affecting our business.
Significant developments. We discuss developments during the most recent threetwo fiscal years. Please read this section in conjunction with “Item 1. Business,” which provides a general description of our business and strategy.
Executive summary. We discuss (a) fiscal 20182020 highlights and (b) our outlook for fiscal 2019,2021, including the trends, developments, and uncertainties that we expect to affect our business.
Results of operations. We discuss (a) fiscal 20182020 results for our largest markets, (b) fiscal 20182020 results for our largest brands, and (c) the causes of year-over-year changes in our income statementstatements of operations line items, including transactions and other items that affect the comparability of our results, for fiscal years 20172020 and 2018.2019.
Liquidity and capital resources. We discuss (a) the causes of year-over-year changes in cash flows from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities; (b) recent and expected future capital expenditures; (c) dividends and share repurchases; and (d) our liquidity position, including capital resources available to us.
Off-balance sheet arrangements.
Off-balance sheet arrangements and long-termLong-term obligations.
Critical accounting policies and estimates. We discuss the critical accounting policies and estimates that require significant management judgment.
Presentation Basis
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use some financial measures in this report that are not measures of financial performance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). These non-GAAP measures, defined below, should be viewed as supplements to (not substitutes for) our results of operations and other measures reported under GAAP. Other companies may not define or calculate these non-GAAP measures in the same way.
“Underlying change” in income statement measures of statements of operations.We present changes in certain income statement measures, or line items, of the statements of operations that are adjusted to an “underlying” basis. We use “underlying change” for the following income statement measures:measures of the statements of operations: (a) underlying net sales; (b) underlying cost of sales; (c) underlying gross profit; (d) underlying advertising expenses; (e) underlying selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses; (f) underlying other expense (income); net; (g) underlying operating expenses;expenses1; and (h) underlying operating income. To calculate these measures, we adjust, as applicable, for (a) acquisitions and divestitures, (b) foreign exchange, (c) estimated net changes in distributor inventories, and (d) a non-cash write-down of the establishment of our charitable foundation.Chambord brand name. We explain these adjustments below.
“Acquisitions and divestitures.” This adjustment removes (a) any non-recurring effects related to our acquisitions and divestitures (e.g., transaction gains or losses, transaction costs, and integration costs), and (b) the effects of operating activity related to acquired and divested brands for periods not comparable year over year (non-comparable periods). By excluding non-comparable periods, we therefore include the effects of acquired and divested brands only to the extent that results are comparable year over year.
“Acquisitions and divestitures.” This adjustment removes (a) any non-recurring effects related to our acquisitions and divestitures (e.g., transaction gains or losses, transaction costs, and integration costs), and (b) the effects of operating activity related to acquired and divested brands for periods not comparable year over year (non-comparable periods). Excluding non-comparable periods allows us to include the effects of acquired and divested brands only to the extent that results are comparable year over year.
1Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.

In fiscal 2016, we sold our Southern Comfort and Tuaca brands and related assets to Sazerac Company, Inc. and entered into a related transition services agreement (TSA). During fiscal 2017, we completed our obligations under the TSA. This adjustment removes the net sales, cost of sales, and operating expenses recognized in fiscal 2017 pursuant to the TSA related to contract bottling services and distribution services in certain markets.
On June 1, 2016,July 3, 2019, we acquired 100% of the voting interests in The BenRiach Distillery86 Company, Limited (BenRiach).which owns Fords Gin, for $22 million in cash. This adjustment removes (a) transaction and integration costs related to the acquisition and (b) operating activity for the acquired business for the non-comparable period. With respect to comparisons ofperiod, which is fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2016, the non-comparable period comprised all months; with respect to comparisons of fiscal 2018 to fiscal 2017, the non-comparable period is the month of May.
“Foreign exchange.”2020 activity for The 86 Company. We calculate the percentage change in our income statement line items in accordance with GAAP and adjust to exclude the cost or benefit of currency fluctuations. Adjustingbelieve that these adjustments allow for foreign exchange allows us to better understand our business on a constant-dollar basis, as fluctuations in exchange rates can distort the underlying trend both positively and negatively. (In this report, “dollar” always means the U.S. dollar unless stated otherwise.) To eliminate the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations when comparing across periods, we translate current-year results at prior-year rates and remove foreign exchange gains and losses from current- and prior-year periods.
“Estimated net change in distributor inventories.” This adjustment refers to the estimated net effect of changes in distributor inventories on changes in our income statement line items. For each period compared, we use volume information from our distributors to estimate the effect of distributor inventory changes on our income statement line items.
“Foundation.” In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we established the Brown-Forman Foundation (the Foundation) with an initial $70 million contribution to support the company’s charitable giving program in the communities where our employees live and work. This adjustment removes the initial $70 million contribution to the Foundation from our underlying SG&A expenses and underlying operating income to present our underlying results on a comparable basis. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details.
1Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.

“Foreign exchange.” We calculate the percentage change in certain line items of the statements of operations in accordance with GAAP and adjust to exclude the cost or benefit of currency fluctuations. Adjusting for foreign exchange allows us to understand our business on a constant-dollar basis, as fluctuations in exchange rates can distort the underlying trend both positively and negatively. (In this report, “dollar” always means the U.S. dollar unless stated otherwise.) To eliminate the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations when comparing across periods, we translate current-year results at prior-year rates and remove transactional and hedging foreign exchange gains and losses from current- and prior-year periods.
“Estimated net change in distributor inventories.” This adjustment refers to the estimated net effect of changes in distributor inventories on changes in certain line items of the statements of operations. For each period compared, we use volume information from our distributors to estimate the effect of distributor inventory changes in certain line items of the statements of operations. We believe that this adjustment reduces the effect of varying levels of distributor inventories on changes in certain line items of the statements of operations and allows us to understand better our underlying results and trends.
“Chambord impairment.” During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $13 million for our Chambord brand name. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” below and Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details.
We use the non-GAAP measures “underlying change”: to: (a) to understand our performance from period to period on a consistent basis; (b) to compare our performance to that of our competitors; (c) in connection withcalculate components of management incentive compensation calculations;compensation; (d) in our planningplan and forecasting processes;forecast; and (e) in communications concerningcommunicate our financial performance withto the board of directors, stockholders, and investment analysts.community. We reconcileprovide reconciliations of the “underlying changeschange” in income statement measures”certain line items of the statements of operations to their nearest GAAP measures in the tables below under “Results of Operations - Year-Over-Year Comparisons.” We have consistently applied the adjustments within our reconciliations in arriving at each non-GAAP measure.
Definitions
Aggregations.
From time to time, to explain our results of operations or to highlight trends and uncertainties affecting our business, we aggregate markets according to stage of economic development as defined by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and we aggregate brands by spirits category. Below, we define the aggregations used in this report.
Geographic Aggregations.
“Developed” markets are “advanced economies” as defined by the IMF. Our largest developed markets are the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Developed international markets are developed markets excluding the United States.
“Emerging” markets are “emerging and developing economies” as defined by the IMF. Our largest emerging markets are Mexico and Poland.
In “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2018 Market Highlights,” we provide supplemental information for our largest markets ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2018 net sales. In addition to markets listed by country name, we include the following aggregations:
“Rest of Europe” includes all markets in Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States other than those specifically listed.
“Remaining geographies” represents all markets (approximately 110) other than those specifically listed or included in “Rest of Europe,” with the largest being Brazil, South Africa, and China.
“Travel Retail” represents our sales to global duty-free customers, travel retail customers, and the U.S. military.
“Other non-branded” includes used barrel, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling sales.

Brand Aggregations.
“Premium bourbon” products include Woodford Reserve, Old Forester, and Coopers’ Craft.
“American whiskey” products include the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, premium bourbons, and Early Times.
“Tequila” products include el Jimador, Herradura, New Mix, Pepe Lopez, and Antiguo.
In “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2018 Brand Highlights,” we provide supplemental information for our largest brands ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2018 net sales. In addition to brands listed by name, we include the following aggregations:
“Jack Daniel’s family of brands” includes Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey (JDTW), Jack Daniel’s RTD and RTP products (JD RTDs/RTP), Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey (JDTH), Gentleman Jack, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire (JDTF), Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye Whiskey (JDTR), Jack Daniel’s Sinatra Select, and Jack Daniel’s No. 27 Gold Tennessee Whiskey.
“Jack Daniel’s RTDs/RTP” products include all RTD line extensions of Jack Daniel’s, such as Jack Daniel’s & Cola, Jack Daniel’s & Diet Cola, Jack & Ginger, Jack Daniel’s Country Cocktails, Gentleman Jack & Cola, Jack Daniel’s Double Jack, Jack Daniel’s American Serve, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey RTD, Jack Daniel’s Cider (JD Cider), Jack Daniel’s Lynchburg Lemonade (JD Lynchburg Lemonade), and the seasonal Jack Daniel’s Winter Jack RTP.
Other Metrics.
“Depletions.” We generally record revenues when we ship our products to our customers. Depending on our route-to-consumer (RTC), we ship products to either (a) retail or wholesale customers in owned distribution markets or (b) our distributor customers in other markets. “Depletions” is a term commonly used in the beverage alcohol industry to describe volume. Depending on the context, “depletions” means either (a) our shipments directly to retail or wholesale customers for owned distribution markets or (b) shipments from our distributor customers to retailers and wholesalers in other markets. We believe that depletions measure volume in a way that more closely reflects consumer demand than our shipments to distributor customers do. In this document, unless otherwise specified, we refer to “depletions” when discussing volume.
“Drinks-equivalent.” Volume is discussed on a nine-liter equivalent unit basis (nine-liter cases) unless otherwise specified. At times, we use a “drinks-equivalent” measure for volume when comparing single-serve ready-to-drink (RTD) or ready-to-pour (RTP) brands to a parent spirits brand. “Drinks-equivalent” depletions are RTD and RTP nine-liter cases converted to nine-liter cases of a parent brand on the basis of the number of drinks in one nine-liter case of the parent brand. To convert RTD volumes from a nine-liter case basis to a drinks-equivalent nine-liter case basis, RTD nine-liter case volumes are divided by 10, while RTP nine-liter case volumes are divided by 5.
“Consumer takeaway.” When discussing trends in the market, we refer to “consumer takeaway,” a term commonly used in the beverage alcohol industry. “Consumer takeaway” refers to the purchase of product by the consumer from a retail outlet as measured by volume or retail sales value. This information is provided by third parties, such as Nielsen and the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association (NABCA). Our estimates of market share or changes in market share are derived from consumer takeaway data using the retail sales value metric.
“Return on average invested capital.” This measure refers to the sum of net income and after-tax interest expense, divided by average invested capital. Average invested capital equals assets less liabilities, excluding interest-bearing debt, and is calculated using the average of the most recent 13 month-end balances. After-tax interest expense equals interest expense multiplied by one minus our effective tax rate. We use this non-GAAP measure because we consider return on average invested capital to be a meaningful indicator of how effectively and efficiently we useinvest capital invested in our business.
We reconcile eachDefinitions
Aggregations.
From time to time, to explain our results of these measuresoperations or to their nearest GAAP measureshighlight trends and uncertainties affecting our business, we aggregate markets according to stage of economic development as defined by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and we aggregate brands by spirits category. Below, we define the geographic and brand aggregations used in the tables below under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Resultsthis report.
Geographic Aggregations.
In “Results of Operations – Executive Summary.- Fiscal 2020 Market Highlights,We have consistently appliedwe provide supplemental information for our largest markets ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2020 net sales. In addition to markets listed by country name, we include the adjustments withinfollowing aggregations:
“Developed International” markets are “advanced economies” as defined by the IMF, excluding the United States. Our largest developed international markets are the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, France, Japan, and Canada. This aggregation represents our net sales of branded products to these markets.
“Emerging” markets are “emerging and developing economies” as defined by the IMF. Our largest emerging markets are Mexico, Poland, and Russia. This aggregation represents our net sales of branded products to these markets.
“Travel Retail” represents our net sales of branded products to global duty-free customers, other travel retail customers, and the U.S. military, regardless of customer location.
“Non-branded and bulk” includes our net sales of used barrels, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling, regardless of customer location.
Brand Aggregations.
In “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2020 Brand Highlights,” we provide supplemental information for our reconciliations in arriving at each non-GAAP measure.largest brands ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2020 net sales. In addition to brands listed by name, we include the following aggregations:

“Whiskey” includes all whiskey spirits and whiskey-based flavored liqueurs, ready-to-drink (RTD), and ready-to-pour products (RTP). The brands included in this category are the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, the Woodford Reserve family of brands (Woodford Reserve), Canadian Mist, GlenDronach, BenRiach, Glenglassaugh, the Old Forester family of brands (Old Forester), Early Times, Slane Irish Whiskey, and Coopers’ Craft.
“American whiskey” includes the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, premium bourbons (defined below), super-premium American whiskey (defined below), and Early Times.
“Jack Daniel’s family of brands” includes Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey (JDTW), Jack Daniel’s RTD and RTP products (JD RTD/RTP), Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey (JDTH), Gentleman Jack, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire (JDTF), Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Apple (JDTA), Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection (JDSB), Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye Whiskey (JDTR), Jack Daniel’s Sinatra Select, Jack Daniel’s No. 27 Gold Tennessee Whiskey, and Jack Daniel’s Bottled-in-Bond.
“Jack Daniel’s RTD and RTP” products include all RTD line extensions of Jack Daniel’s, such as Jack Daniel’s & Cola, Jack Daniel’s Country Cocktails, Jack Daniel’s & Diet Cola, Jack & Ginger, Jack Daniel’s Double Jack, Gentleman Jack & Cola, Jack Daniel’s Lynchburg Lemonade, Jack Daniel’s American Serve, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey RTD, Jack Daniel’s Berry, Jack Daniel’s Cider, and the seasonal Jack Daniel’s Winter Jack RTP.
“Premium bourbons” includes Woodford Reserve, Old Forester, and Coopers’ Craft.
“Super-premium American whiskey” includes Woodford Reserve, Gentleman Jack, JDSB, JDTR, Jack Daniel’s Sinatra Select, and Jack Daniel’s No. 27 Gold Tennessee Whiskey.
“Tequila” includes el Jimador, the Herradura family of brands (Herradura), New Mix, Pepe Lopez, and Antiguo.
“Wine” includes Korbel Champagnes and Sonoma-Cutrer wines.
“Vodka” includes Finlandia.
“Non-branded and bulk” includes our net sales of used barrels, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling, regardless of customer location.
Other Metrics.
“Depletions.” We generally record revenues when we ship our products to our customers. Depletions is a term commonly used in the beverage alcohol industry to describe volume. Depending on the context, depletions means either (a) our shipments directly to retail or wholesale customers for owned distribution markets or (b) shipments from our distributor customers to retailers and wholesalers in other markets. We believe that depletions measure volume in a way that more closely reflects consumer demand than our shipments to distributor customers do. In this document, unless otherwise specified, we refer to depletions when discussing volume.
“Consumer takeaway.” When discussing trends in the market, we refer to consumer takeaway, a term commonly used in the beverage alcohol industry that refers to the purchase of product by consumers from retail outlets as measured by volume or retail sales value. This information is provided by third parties, such as Nielsen and the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association (NABCA). Our estimates of market share or changes in market share are derived from consumer takeaway data using the retail sales value metric. We believe consumer takeaway is a leading indicator of how consumer demand is trending.


Significant Developments
Below we discuss the significant developments in our business during fiscal 2016, fiscal 2017,2019 and fiscal 2018.2020. These developments relate to (a)the COVID-19 pandemic (COVID-19), tariffs, innovation, (b) acquisitions and divestitures, and (c) capital deployment.
InnovationCOVID-19
Jack Daniel’s familyCOVID-19 negatively affected our results beginning in the fourth quarter of brands. Innovation withinfiscal 2020. Year-to-date underlying net sales for the Jack Daniel’s familynine months ended January 31, 2020, grew in the low single digits and were adversely affected by COVID-19 during the fourth quarter of brandsfiscal 2020. This was largely reflected in both on-premise (representing nearly 20% of our business) and Travel Retail channels essentially coming to a halt in March and April. Solid off-premise gains across some of our developed markets, which reflected an increase in at-home consumption, pantry loading, and strong growth in the e-premise channel only partially offset the on-premise and Travel Retail declines. While the financial impact of COVID-19 on our results is difficult to measure, it has driven growth overhad an unfavorable impact on our operating income and business operations. We discuss the last three years:estimated effect of COVID-19 on our results where relevant below.
Despite the negative effects of COVID-19 on our results in the fourth quarter and the full year, we ended the fiscal year in a strong financial position, and we believe that our capacity to generate solid operating cash flow remains sound, allowing us to navigate this crisis as circumstances evolve. Additionally, we have no current or impending shareholder distributions beyond regular dividends and no maturities of long-term debt until our fiscal 2023. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for details.
Tariffs
Tariffs negatively affected our results beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2019, and are expected to continue to have a negative impact on our results as long as tariffs are in place. While our results for fiscal 2020 were negatively affected by tariffs as described below, the year-over-year impact began to ease during the third quarter of fiscal 2020.
Lower net sales. Certain customers paid the incremental costs of tariffs, and we compensated these customers for these incremental costs by reducing our net prices, which lowered our net sales.
Higher cost of sales. In markets where we own inventory, we paid the incremental cost of tariffs, which increased our cost of sales.
The combined effect of these tariff-related costs, whether arising as a reduction of net sales or as an increase in cost of sales, is hereafter referred to as “tariff-related costs.” We discuss the estimated effect of the tariffs on our results where relevant below.
Innovation
We introduced our second
Jack Daniel’s flavored whiskey product, JDTF, starting withfamily of brands. Innovation within the United States in late fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2016, we completedJack Daniel’s family of brands has contributed to our growth over the U.S. launch and continued the global rollout of JDTF. In fiscal 2017, we expanded JDTF to markets including France, Germany, and Travel Retail. In fiscal 2018, we expanded JDTF to Brazil and Chile.last two years as described below.
In fiscal 2018,2019, we introducedexpanded JDTR to several newadditional markets including France, Travel Retail, Germany, and Poland, and we launched Jack Daniel’s RTD products, including Jack Daniel’s Southern Peach Country CocktailsBottled-in-Bond exclusively in the United States, Jack Daniel’s Cider in the United Kingdom, and Jack Daniel’s Lynchburg Lemonade in Germany. These introductions all contributed to our Jack Daniel’s RTD growth in those markets.Travel Retail.
In fiscal 2018,2020, we introduced JDTR, the first full-strength whiskey from thelaunched Jack Daniel’s family of brands in over two decades,Tennessee Apple, which was introduced in the United States in the fall of 2019 and certaina few select international markets. With this successful launch,markets in the spring of 2020.
Other American whiskeys. We continue to capitalize on consumers’ interest in premium-plus whiskey with our total Rye whiskey portfolio,wide range of brands, including Woodford Reserve Rye Whiskey and Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Rye, surpassed 100,000 nine-liter casesOld Forester.
We introduced Woodford Reserve Straight Malt and Woodford Reserve Straight Wheat in fiscal 2018.2019 and fiscal 2020, respectively.
Other American whiskeys. We continue to capitalize on consumers’ interest in super- and ultra-premium whiskey with our range of brands, including Woodford Reserve and Old Forester.
In fiscal 2017, we unveiled new packaging for Woodford Reserve Double Oaked, the most successful line extension from Woodford Reserve to date (first introduced in 2012). The Double Oaked variant of Woodford Reserve continued to contribute meaningfully to the brand’s growth and reached nearly 50,000 nine-liter cases in fiscal 2018.
From fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2017,2019, we introduced threeOld Forester’s first new grain recipe with the launch of Old Forester craft expressions in our Old Forester Whiskey Row Series. In fiscal 2018, we added Old Forester Statesman, which won a double gold medal at the 2018 San Francisco World Spirits Competition. In addition, we launched new packaging for our core Old Forester bourbons in February 2017. Our founding brand grew net sales by more than 35% per year from fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2018.Rye.
Also in fiscal 2017, we introduced our first entirely new bourbon in 20 years, Coopers’ Craft, a super-premium brand now in limited distribution in the United States.
Tequila brands. We experienced another record year for our tequila brands in fiscal 2018, as Herradura, el Jimador, and New Mix contributed significantly to our overall net sales growth. In fiscal 2015, we released Herradura Ultra to participate in the fast-growing market for ultra-premium “cristalino” tequilas in Mexico, and it has been a significant driver of our tequila growth during the last four fiscal years, surpassing 70,000 nine-liter cases in fiscal 2018.
Acquisitions and Divestitures
In June 2015,On July 3, 2019, we purchased allacquired 100% of the shares of Slane Castle Irish Whiskey Limited. In April 2017, we unveiled the first product from our Slane Irish Whiskey brandvoting interests in Travel Retail in Ireland, and we introduced the brand selectively in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia in the summer of 2017. In fiscal 2019, we plan to expand Slane nationally in the United States.
In March 2016, we sold our Southern Comfort and Tuaca brands and related assets to SazeracThe 86 Company, Inc.which owns Fords Gin, for $543$22 million in cash, which resulted in a gain of $485 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. We substantially completed all activities related to this transition of ownership in fiscal 2017. See ‘‘Executive Summary’’ below and Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about the financial impact of the sale of Southern Comfort and Tuaca.cash.
On June 1, 2016, we acquired The BenRiach Distillery Company Limited (BenRiach) for aggregate consideration of $407 million, consisting of a purchase price of $341 million and $66 million in assumed debt and transaction-related obligations that we have since paid. The acquisition, which brought three single malt Scotch whisky brands into our portfolio, included brand trademarks, inventories, three homeplaces, three malt distilleries, a bottling plant, and BenRiach’s headquarters in Edinburgh, Scotland. We believe that these super-premium brands will provide us an opportunity to participate in the growing single malt Scotch category and strengthen our portfolio’s long-term growth prospects in the United States, the United


Kingdom, Taiwan, Germany, and Travel Retail. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Capital Deployment
Beyond the acquisition and divestiture activities described above, we have focused our capital deployment initiatives on (a) enabling the expected future growth of our existing businesses through investments in our production capacity, barrel whiskey inventory, and brand-building efforts; and (b) returning cash to our shareholders.
Investments. From fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2018, our capital expenditures totaled approximately $350 million and focused on enabling the growth of our premium whiskey brands:
stockholders.
Jack Daniel’s.We continued to expandInvestments. During fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020, our shipping warehouse facilitycapital expenditures totaled approximately $230 million and built an additional warehouse.focused on enabling the growth of our premium whiskey brands:
Woodford Reserve.Jack Daniel’s.We expanded our bottlingshipping warehouse facility and built four newtwo additional warehouses.
Woodford Reserve. We built two additional new warehouses, to support the brand’s strong growth.
Old Forester.We continued construction ofopened the Old Forester Distillery and visitors’ center on Main Street in Louisville, Kentucky, which we expect to open in Junethe summer of 2018.
Slane Irish Whiskey. We opened a consumer experience on the historic Slane Castle Estate in the fall of 2017. We also continued building a new distillery which we expect to open in the summer of 2018.
Debt and equity transactions. From fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2018, we returned $3.0 billion to our shareholders through $0.8 billion in regular quarterly dividends, $0.5 billion in special dividends, and $1.7 billion in share repurchases. We financed our dividends and repurchases with cash on hand and proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt totaling $1.8 billion (net).
Executive Summary
Fiscal 2018 Highlights
We delivered net sales of $3.2 billion, an increase of 8% compared to fiscal 2017. Excluding (a) the positive effect of foreign exchange driven by the strengthening of the euro, Polish zloty, and Mexican peso and (b) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in the United States, we grew underlying net sales 6%.
From a brand perspective, our underlying net sales growth was driven by the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, our premium bourbon brands, and our tequila brands.
From a geographic perspective,
Brown-Forman Cooperage. We invested in the United Statesmodernization of our cooperage.
Cash returned to stockholders. During fiscal 2019 and emerging markets led the growthfiscal 2020, we returned $0.8 billion to our stockholders through $0.6 billion in underlying net sales, while developed international markets also accelerated underlying net sales growth compared to fiscal 2017.regular quarterly dividends, and $0.2 billion in share repurchases.

Executive Summary
Fiscal 2020 Highlights
We delivered operating incomereported net sales of $1.0$3.4 billion, an increase of 5%1% compared to fiscal 2017.2019. Excluding the impact of (a) the $70 million contribution to establish the Foundation, (b) the positivenegative effect of foreign exchange and (c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories, underlying net sales were flat. Growth of our premium bourbon brands, the launch of JDTA, and JD RTDs was offset by declines of JDTW and Finlandia. From a geographic perspective, the United States was the largest contributor to our underlying net sales. Declines in Travel Retail, developed international, and emerging markets offset this growth. COVID-19 had a negative impact on our results from both a brand and geographic perspective.
We delivered reported operating income grew 8%.of $1.1 billion, a decrease of 5% compared to fiscal 2019. Excluding an estimated net increase in distributor inventories and the Chambord impairment, underlying operating income declined 6% reflecting higher input and tariff-related costs (defined above) along with an increase in SG&A expense.
We delivered diluted earnings per share of $1.48, an increase$1.72, a decrease of 8%1% compared to fiscal 2017 due to an increase2019, as a reduction in reported operating income was only partially offset by a lower effective tax rate and a reductiondecline in our effective tax rate.non-operating postretirement expense.
Our return on average invested capital increaseddecreased to 20.0%20.4% in fiscal 2018,2020, compared to 19.8%22.0% in fiscal 2017.


2019. This decrease was driven by higher average invested capital.
Summary of Operating Performance Fiscal 2016 - 2018
Summary of Operating Performance Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2020Summary of Operating Performance Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2020
      Reported Change 
Underlying Change1
    2019 vs. 2020
Fiscal year ended April 302016 2017 2018 2016 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2018 2016 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 20182019 2020 Reported Change 
Underlying Change1
                    
Net sales$3,089
 $2,994
 $3,248
 (3%) 8% 3% 6%$3,324
 $3,363
 1% %
Cost of sales945
 973
 1,046
 3% 7% 4% 8%1,158
 1,236
 7% 7%
Gross profit2,144
 2,021
 2,202
 (6%) 9% 3% 6%2,166
 2,127
 (2%) (3%)
Advertising417
 383
 414
 (8%) 8% 2% 6%396
 383
 (3%) (2%)
SG&A688
 667
 765
 (3%) 15% (2%) 3%641
 642
 % 1%
Operating income$1,533
 $989
 $1,039
 (35%) 5% 7% 8%$1,144
 $1,091
 (5%) (6%)
                    
Total operating expenses2
$1,096
 $1,032
 $1,163
 (6%) 13% (1%) 4%$1,022
 $1,036
 1% %
                    
As a percentage of net sales3
                    
Gross profit69.4% 67.5% 67.8% (1.9pp) 0.3pp    65.2% 63.2% (2.0pp)  
Operating expenses2
35.5% 34.5% 35.8% (1.0pp) 1.3pp    
Operating income49.6% 33.0% 32.0% (16.6pp) (1.0pp)    34.4% 32.4% (2.0pp)  
                    
Interest expense, net$44
 $56
 $62
 29% 9%    $80
 $77
 (4%)  
Effective tax rate28.3% 28.3% 26.6% 
 (1.7pp)    19.8% 18.0% (1.8pp)  
Diluted earnings per share$2.09
 $1.37
 $1.48
 (34%) 8%    $1.73
 $1.72
 (1%)  
Return on average invested capital4
34.1% 19.8% 20.0% (14.3pp) 0.2pp    22.0% 20.4% (1.6pp)  
  
1See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “underlying changes,change,” including how we calculate these measures and why we think this information is useful to readers.
2Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.
3Year-over-year changes in percentages are reported in percentage points (pp).
4See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “return on average invested capital,” including how we calculate this measure and why we think this information is useful to readers.
Fiscal 20192021 Outlook
Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, we have taken a “People First” approach to this crisis, taking numerous measures ensuring the health and safety of our employees. We are optimistic about our prospects for growth of net sales, operating income, and diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2019. Below we discuss our current expectations for fiscal 2019, including trends, developments, and uncertainties that we expect may affect our business. When we provide guidance for underlying change for the following income statement measures we do not provide guidance for the corresponding GAAP change because the GAAP measure will include items that are difficult to quantify or predict with reasonable certainty, including the estimated net change in distributor inventories and foreign exchange, each of which could have a significant impact to our GAAP income statement measures.
Outlook for key measures:
Underlying net sales. We expect the underlying net sales growth rate trend from fiscal 2018 to continue. We anticipate the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, our portfolio of premium bourbons, and our tequila brands to again drive our growth. We expect that volume will be the most significant driver of underlying net sales growth in fiscal 2019.
Underlying expenses. We expect total underlying expenses to grow more slowly than net sales. In addition, we expect: (a) for underlying cost of sales, input costs should increase in the mid-single digits, (b) underlying advertising expenses should grow at a rate similar to our net sales growth rate, and (c) underlying SG&A expenses to be approximately unchanged compared to fiscal 2018.
Additional considerationsface substantial uncertainty related to our fiscal 2019 outlook:

Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In fiscal 2019, we will implement ASU 2014-09, which replaces existing revenue recognition guidance.the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on the global economy. We have concluded that adoption will not have acurrently expect no material impact on our financial statements. However,
ability to make, ship, market, and sell our brands to our consumers. Our total number of employees has remained essentially unchanged (since COVID-19), and at this time we


underexpect this to continue as we leverage our people resources by reallocating them toward the new standard,off-premise channel and the rapidly growing e-premise channel.
We have increased our focus on the management of our uses of cash, such as reducing spend behind on-premise and global travel retail activities as well as discretionary spend (including hiring and travel freezes), and deferring certain capital expenditures and re-prioritizing where necessary, while continuing to invest behind the business where appropriate.
Further, as COVID-19 and its effect on the global economy continues to evolve, we will estimatecontinue to closely monitor key developments in our markets, including (a) the stage of recovery, (b) industry and recognizeconsumer behavior, (c) macroeconomic conditions, and (d) the costtiming, likelihood, severity, and restrictions associated with any future waves of certain customer incentives earlier than we have historically. Although we expect this change in timing to shift the recognitionCOVID-19.
As a result of these costs amonguncertainties, we are not able to provide quantitative guidance for fiscal quarters,2021 at this time. From a qualitative perspective, we do not expectbelieve that the full-year impact to be significant. Additionally, some payments to customers previously classified as advertising or SG&A expenses will be classified as reductions of net sales under the new standard. We anticipate the impact of this change in classification to be insignificant. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Productivity and efficiency initiative. In June 2017, we announced a three-year (fiscal 2018 – fiscal 2020) cost-saving and productivity initiative to deliver sustainable cost savings and accelerate our net sales growth rate. We expect to invest a portion of the cost savings generated by the initiative in incremental advertising and promotional activities. Our fiscal 2019 outlook reflects this initiative’s expected effects.
Foreign exchange. In fiscal 2018, our reported results were helped by foreign exchange due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar. We cannot predict the movement of foreign exchange rates with reasonable certainty; however, considering spot rates as of April 30, 2018, we expect a modest negative effect to our fiscal 2019 results. See “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” for details about foreign exchange and our business.
Tax Act. In December 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act), which significantly revises the U.S. corporate income tax by lowering the U.S. corporate income tax rate. During fiscal 2018, we recorded a provisional net charge of $43 million related to the transitional impacts of the Tax Act. Our fiscal 2019 effective tax rateTravel Retail channel will not include these transitional impacts of the Tax Act and will include a full year of the lower U.S. corporate income tax rate. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Foundation. In fiscal 2018, we established the Brown-Forman Foundation with an initial contribution of $70 million, which we do not expect to repeatrecover in fiscal 2019. The expense recorded2021, the on-premise channel recovery will depend on a variety of factors, and emerging markets will likely be slower to establishrecover.
We currently believe that with a strong balance sheet, solid cash flows, and ample liquidity, we will fund ongoing investments in the Foundation was removed from our underlying change in fiscal 2018 SG&Abusiness and operating income measures.pay regular dividends. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above“Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for details.
Tariffs. In response to the U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, the European Union and several other countries including Canada, China, Russia, and Turkey have threatened retaliatory tariffs. In addition, Mexico has imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, including American whiskey. We have a significant U.S. manufacturing base and export our American whiskeys around the world. As the extent of any potential tariffs from key U.S. trading partners is uncertain, their potential impact on our business is unknown. We continue to monitor this situation and consider measures to mitigate risk.



















Results of Operations
Fiscal 20182020 Market Highlights
The following table shows net sales results for our ten largest markets, summarized by geographic area, for fiscal 20182020 compared to fiscal 2017.2019. We discuss the most significant changes in net sales for each market.market below the table.
Top 10 Markets - Percentage of Fiscal 2018 Total Net Sales and Fiscal 2018 Net Sales Growth by Geographic Area
Top 10 MarketsTop 10 Markets
   
Net Sales % Change vs. 2017
   
Net Sales % Change vs. 2019
Markets1
 % of Fiscal 2018 Net Sales ReportedAcquisitions and DivestituresForeign ExchangeEstimated Net Chg in Distributor Inventories 
Underlying2
Geographic area1
 % of Fiscal 2020 Net Sales ReportedForeign ExchangeEstimated Net Chg in Distributor Inventories 
Underlying2
United States 47% 7%%%(2%) 5% 50% 8%%(3%) 5%
Europe 27% 12%%(4%)% 8%
Developed International 27% (2%)1%(1%) (1%)
United Kingdom 6% 4%%(1%)% 3% 5% (10%)2%% (8%)
Germany 5% 14%%(4%)% 10% 5% 8%(1%)% 7%
Australia 5% (5%)4%% (1%)
France 4% 11%%(5%)% 6% 4% (1%)%% (1%)
Japan 1% 17%(2%)(14%) 1%
Canada 1% 8%%(8%) %
Rest of Developed International 5% (5%)1%1% (2%)
Emerging 17% (4%)1%1% (1%)
Mexico 5% (7%)%% (7%)
Poland 3% 15%%(7%)% 7% 3% (1%)3%% 2%
Russia 1% 52%%(3%)(30%) 19% 2% 6%5%(3%) 8%
Rest of Europe 8% 12%%(5%)2% 9%
Australia 5% 8%1%(1%)% 8%
Other geographies 14% 10%%(2%)1% 9%
Mexico 5% 15%%(3%)% 12%
Brazil 1% 34%%3%(8%) 28%
Canada 1% 2%%(1%)2% 3%
Remaining geographies 7% 3%%(1%)3% 5%
Rest of Emerging 8% (5%)1%2% (1%)
Travel Retail 4% 13%%%(5%) 8% 4% (11%)1%1% (10%)
Other non-branded 3% (2%)11%(1%)% 9%
Non-branded and bulk 2% (30%)%% (29%)
Total 100% 8%%(1%)(1%) 6% 100% 1%1%(2%) %
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding      
Note: Results may differ due to rounding      
  
1See “Definitions” above for definitions of market aggregations presented here.
2See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “underlying change” in net sales, including how we calculate this measure and why we believe this information is useful to readers.

The United States, our most important market, accounted for 47% of our reported netNet sales in fiscal 2018, down from 48% in fiscal 2017. In fiscal 2018, reported net sales in the United States grew 7%, while underlying net sales increased 5%, after adjusting for an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales gains were fueled by (a) the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, led by JDTW, JDTH, and the launch of JDTR; (b) our premium bourbon brands, led by Woodford Reserve and Old Forester; and (c) the growth of our tequila brands. This growth was partially offset by declines of Korbel Champagne and Canadian Mist.
Europe accounted for 27% of our reported net sales in fiscal 2018, up from 26% in fiscal 2017. For fiscal 2018, reported net sales in Europe increased 12%, while underlying net sales grew 8%, after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange driven by the weakeningall of the dollar againstmarkets discussed below were adversely affected by COVID-19 during the euro, Polish zloty, British pound, and Turkish lira. Underlying net sales growth was driven by gains in Germany, Russia, France, Poland, Turkey,fourth quarter of fiscal 2020. See “Significant Developments - COVID-19” above for more information around the United Kingdom, and Spain.
In the United Kingdom, underlying net sales growth was driven by the launchimpact of JD Cider and higher volumes of JDTW.
In Germany, underlying net sales growth was driven by higher volumes, higher prices, and favorable mix of JD RTDs and JDTW. JD RTDs benefited from the launch of JD Lynchburg Lemonade RTD in fiscal 2018.


COVID-19 on our results.
In France,The United States, our most important market, represented 50% of our reported net sales, which grew 8% in fiscal 2020. Underlying net sales increased 5% after adjusting for an estimated net increase in distributor inventories (as a result of distributors building their inventory levels in April 2020 due to the uncertainty around potential supply chain disruptions resulting from COVID-19). Underlying net sales were adversely affected by COVID-19 during the fourth quarter largely due to the closures in the on-premise channel. The underlying net sales gains for the fiscal year were driven by (a) our premium bourbons, led by Woodford Reserve and Old Forester, supported by strong consumer takeaway trends; and (b) the launch of JDTA. This growth was partially offset by declines of JDTW, as lower net pricing partly offset an increase in volumes.
Developed International markets represented 27% of our reported net sales, which declined 2% in fiscal 2020. Underlying net sales decreased 1%, after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. Year-to-date underlying net sales for the nine months ended January 31, 2020, grew in the low single digits and were adversely affected by COVID-19 during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 largely due to the closures in the on-premise channel. The full-year underlying net sales declines were driven by the United Kingdom, partially offset by growth in Germany.
The United Kingdom’s underlying net sales decline was primarily driven by a planned reduction in promotional activities for JDTW, which resulted in lower volumes and an unfavorable channel and size mix. COVID-19 had a further adverse effect on results primarily due to the closures in the on-premise channel.

Germany’s underlying net sales growth was fueled by continued volumetric gains of JD RTDs. COVID-19 had an adverse effect on JDTW primarily due to the closures in the on-premise channel, while JD RTDs continued their strong growth in the fourth quarter.
Australia’s underlying net sales decline was driven by lower volumes of JD RTDs and JDTW, partially offset by the volumetric growth of our super-premium American whiskey portfolio. COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results primarily due to the closures in the on-premise channel as underlying net sales declined in the fourth quarter.
France’s underlying net sales decline was driven by lower volumes and prices of JDTW, partially offset by the volumetric growth of JDTH along with the launch of JD RTDs. COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results primarily due to the closures in the on-premise channel in the fourth quarter.
Japan’s underlying net sales growth was driven by higher volumes of Early Times.
Canada’s underlying net sales were flat as favorable price/mix was offset by lower volumes. COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results in the fourth quarter.
Underlying net sales in the Rest of Developed International decreased primarily due to lower JDTW volumes in Spain, a heavily on-premise market, as COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results primarily due to the closures in this channel.
Emerging markets represented 17% of our reported net sales and declined 4% in fiscal 2020. Underlying net sales decreased 1% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. Year-to-date underlying net sales for the nine months ended January 31, 2020, grew in the mid-single digits and were adversely affected by COVID-19 during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, which drove our underlying net sales down for the fiscal year. The full-year underlying net sales declines were led by Mexico, partially offset by growth in Turkey, Russia, and China.
Mexico’s underlying net sales declines were driven by lower volumes of New Mix, el Jimador, and JDTW, partially offset by higher pricing of el Jimador. These declines partly reflect the recessionary economy, and were further negatively impacted by COVID-19 in the fourth quarter.
Poland’s underlying net sales growth was driven by the volumetric growth of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands led by JDTW, Gentleman Jack, and JDTH, partially offset by lower volumes and net prices of Finlandia. Tough comparisons to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019 along with the adverse effects of COVID-19 negatively impacted full-year growth.
Russia’s underlying net sales growth was driven by higher volumes of JDTW and JDTH, as the Jack Daniel’s family of brands continued to gain market sharesupported by strong consumer demand. COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results in the world’s fourth largest whiskey market.1quarter.
In Poland, higher volumes of JDTW fueled underlying net sales growth driven by strong consumer takeaway trends.
In Russia, underlying net sales growth was driven by higher pricing on Finlandia, partially offset by declines of JDTW. The higher price of Finlandia is partly attributed to import duties resulting from a change in our RTC in fiscal 2017.
Underlying net sales growth in the rest of Europe was led by increases in Turkey, Spain, and Ukraine. Growth in Spain has accelerated in fiscal 2018 following our strategic investment in a new distribution operation.
Australia accounted for 5% of our reported net sales in both fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017. In fiscal 2018, reported net sales grew 8%, while underlying net sales also increased 8% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange and the offsetting loss of net sales related to our TSA for Southern Comfort and Tuaca. Underlying net sales growth was led by higher prices of our core JD RTD brands, Jack Daniel’s & Cola and Jack Daniel’s Double Jack, along with volumetric growth of JDTW.
Net sales for our other geographies constituted 14% of our reported net sales in both fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017. Reported net sales increased 10% in fiscal 2018 and underlying net sales were up 9% after adjusting reported results for the positive effect of foreign exchange driven by the weakening of the dollar against the Mexican peso and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales growth was led by Mexico, Brazil, and China, partially offset by declines in Japan.
Travel Retail accounted for 4%of our reported net sales in fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017.Reported net sales increased 13% in fiscal 2018 and underlying net sales increased 8% after adjusting for an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales growth in fiscal 2018 was driven by increased travel, stabilization of foreign exchange, and increased promotional activity resulting in higher volumes of JDTW, Woodford Reserve, and Gentleman Jack.
Other non-branded accounted for 3% of our reported net sales in both fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017. Reported net sales decreased 2%, while underlying net sales grew 9% after removing the net effect of acquired and divested businesses (primarily contract bottling sales related to our TSA agreement) and the positive effect of foreign exchange. The increase in underlying net sales was driven by higher volumes of used barrel sales and an increase in bulk whiskey sales, partially offset by declines in contract bottling sales.















Underlying net sales in the Rest of Emerging decreased as declines of JDTW in sub-Saharan Africa, Romania, and Chile were partially offset by growth for the brand in Turkey and China. COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results in these markets.
1IWSR, 2017 data.
Travel Retail represented 4%of our reported net sales and declined 11% in fiscal 2020. Underlying net sales decreased 10% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. Year-to-date underlying net sales for the nine months ended January 31, 2020, declined in the low single digits and were significantly adversely affected by COVID-19 during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 largely reflecting the unprecedented implementation of travel bans and other restrictions. The full-year underlying net sales decline was driven by lower volumes of JDTW and Finlandia, partially offset by the volumetric growth of Woodford Reserve.
Non-branded and bulk represented 2% of our reported net sales and declined 30% in fiscal 2020. Underlying net sales decreased 29% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange. Declines were driven by lower volumes and prices for used barrels along with a decrease in bulk whiskey sales.




Fiscal 20182020 Brand Highlights
The following table highlights the worldwide results of our largest brands for fiscal 20182020 compared to fiscal 2017.2019. We discuss results of the brands most affecting our performance below the table.
Major Brands Worldwide Results for Fiscal 2018
 Depletions 
Net Sales % Change vs. 2017
Brand family / brand1
Nine-Liter Cases (Millions)% Change vs. 2017 
Drinks-Equivalent (Millions)1
% Change vs. 2017 ReportedForeign ExchangeEstimated Net Chg in Distributor Inventories 
Underlying2
Jack Daniel’s Family24.97% 17.16% 8%(1%)(1%) 6%
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey13.05% 13.05% 6%(1%)% 4%
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey1.78% 1.78% 10%(2%)1% 9%
Jack Daniel’s RTDs/RTP8.79% 0.99% 15%(1%)% 14%
Gentleman Jack0.67% 0.67% 9%%(1%) 7%
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire0.614% 0.614% 20%(1%)(4%) 15%
Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands0.327% 0.327% 26%(2%)(12%) 13%
Woodford Reserve0.723% 0.723% 26%%(4%) 22%
Finlandia3.02% 3.02% 10%(2%)(3%) 5%
el Jimador1.38% 1.38% 14%(1%)(4%) 9%
Herradura0.515% 0.515% 17%(1%)3% 19%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding          
Major Brands
 Volumes
Net Sales % Change vs. 2019
Product category / brand family / brand1
9L Depletions1
 ReportedAcquisitions & DivestituresForeign ExchangeEstimated Net Chg in Distributor Inventories 
Underlying2
Whiskey2% 3%%1%(2%) 2%
Jack Daniel’s family of brands2% 1%%1%(2%) %
JDTW(3%) (3%)%1%(2%) (4%)
JD RTD/RTP4% 6%%2%(1%) 7%
JDTH6% 3%%1%1% 5%
Gentleman Jack7% 5%%%1% 7%
JDTF(1%) (4%)%1%1% (3%)
Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands73% 58%%1%(17%) 41%
Woodford Reserve20% 23%%%(4%) 19%
Tequila(7%) 5%%%(2%) 2%
el Jimador(3%) 8%%%(3%) 5%
Herradura1% 11%%(1%)(4%) 7%
Wine(1%) %%%% (1%)
Vodka (Finlandia)(9%) (13%)%1%1% (12%)
Rest of Portfolio1% 1%(5%)3%(2%) (3%)
Non-branded and bulkNA
 (30%)%%% (29%)
Note: Results may differ due to rounding       
  
1See “Definitions” above for definitions of brand aggregations and volume measures presented here.
2See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “underlying change” in net sales, including how we calculate this measure and why we believe this information is useful to readers.

In fiscal 2018, the Jack Daniel’s family of brands grew volumes 6% globally to 17.1 million drinks-equivalent nine-liter cases. Reported netNet sales for the family grew 8%, while underlying net sales increased 6% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange primarily due to the weakeningall of the dollar againstbrands discussed below were adversely affected by COVID-19 during the euro, Polish zloty, Turkish lira, British pound, and Mexican peso and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories infourth quarter of fiscal 2020. See “Significant Developments - COVID-19” above for more information around the United States. Jack Daniel’s familyimpact of brands was the most significant contributor toCOVID-19 on our total underlying net sales growth in fiscal 2018. Here are details about the underlying performance of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands:results.
Whiskey brands grew volumes 2% in fiscal 2020. Reported net sales grew 3%, while underlying net sales increased 2% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The underlying net sales gain was driven by Woodford Reserve, the launch of JDTA, and JD RTDs, partially offset by JDTW declines.
The Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskeyfamily of brands had flat underlying net sales as (a) the launch of JDTA, (b) growth of JD RTDs in Germany and the United States, and (c) broad-based geographic gains of JDTH were offset by broad-based declines of JDTW as COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results primarily due to on-premise and Travel Retail channels essentially coming to a halt in March and April.
JDTW generates a significant percentage of our total net sales and is our top priority. JDTWThe brand is the largest brand in the world priced over $25 per 750 ml per bottle1 and the world’s fourth-largest premium spirits brand measured by both volume and retail value.volume.2 During calendar 2017,2019, JDTW grew volume for the 26th28th consecutive year21 and, among the top five premium spirits brands on the list, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey was the only one to grow volume in each of the past five years12 – an achievement that underscores our belief in the brand’s sustainable appeal and long-term growth potential. JDTW grew volumes 5% globallyDespite these accomplishments, the brand has experienced a number of challenges, including retaliatory tariffs, primarily in fiscal 2018, a significant increase from its 1% growth rateEurope, and the negative impact of COVID-19 across many of our major markets in fiscal 2017. JDTW reportedthe fourth quarter. Underlying net sales grew 6%, while underlying net sales increased 4%declines of JDTW were broad based, led by decreases in the United Kingdom, the United States, Brazil, Poland, Turkey, France, Travel Retail, Germany, and Australia.France. These declines were partially offset by growth in Turkey and Russia.
Since its introduction in late fiscal 2011, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey has contributed significantly to our net sales growth. JDTH is now the 15th largest brand in the world priced over $25 per 750ml bottle.1 In fiscal 2018, JDTH grew volumes by 8%, on top of the 6% growth rate last fiscal year. The brand grew reported net sales 10% and underlying net sales 9%, driven by higher volumes in the United States and France.

1IWSR, 2019 data.
 
1IWSR, 2017 data.
2Based on industry statistics published by Impact Databank, a well-known U.S. trade publication, in March 2018.2020


JD RTD/RTP increased underlying net saleswith volumetric gains in Germany and the United States.
Since its introduction in late fiscal 2011, JDTH has contributed significantly to our net sales growth. JDTH is the second-largest selling flavored whiskey1and remains one of the top 25 largest brands in the world priced over $25 per 750 ml bottle.2 Despite the adverse affect of COVID-19 in the fourth quarter, underlying net sales gains for the brand were broad-based, reflecting higher volumes, particularly in the United States and France.
Gentleman Jack increased underlying net sales with broad-based volumetric growth led by the United States, Poland, and Germany.
JDTF has been one of the top five largest selling flavored whiskeys since 2015.2 Underlying net sales declines were driven by lower volumes and unfavorable price/mix in the United States and lower volumes in the on-premise and Travel Retail channels as COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results in the fourth quarter.
The increase in underlying net sales for our Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands was fueled by the launch of JDTA in the United States in the fall of 2019.
Woodford Reserve is the leading super-premium American whiskey globally2, and is poised for continued growth as interest in bourbon continues to increase around the world. The brand was once again selected as an Impact “Hot Brand.”1 The United States is by far the brand’s most important market and was responsible for most of its growth during fiscal 2020. However, the brand continued its momentum outside the United States, growing volumes 16%, led by the United Kingdom and Travel Retail. We plan to continue devoting substantial resources to Woodford Reserve to support its growth potential with sustained advertising, including our Kentucky Derby sponsorship, and ongoing capital investments.
Tequila volumes declined 7% in fiscal 2020, while reported net sales increased 5% and underlying net sales grew 2% after adjusting for an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. These results were negatively affected by the recessionary economy in Mexico and the fourth-quarter effect of COVID-19.
el Jimador remains one of the top ten largest selling tequilas measured by volume.2 Underlying net sales growth reflects higher volumes in the United States, where consumer takeaway trends remained strong, partially offset by lower volumes in Mexico.
Herradura’s underlying net sales growth was driven by increased volumes, higher prices, and favorable product mix in the United States. We remain focused on developing Herradura in this important market (which we believe has considerable potential for growth), strengthening our position in Mexico, and continuing to build our presence in higher-value tequila markets throughout the world.
Wine volumes declined 1% in fiscal 2020, while reported net sales were flat and underlying net sales declined 1% after adjusting for an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The decrease in underlying net sales was driven by lower volumes in the United States as COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results in the fourth quarter.
Finlandia volumes fell 9% in fiscal 2020, while reported net sales decreased 13% and underlying net sales declined 12% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. The decrease in underlying net sales was driven by lower volumes and net prices in Poland, along with lower volumes in Travel Retail as COVID-19 had an adverse effect on results in the fourth quarter.
Rest of Portfolio volumes increased 1%, while reported net sales increased 1% and underlying net sales declined 3% after adjusting for (a) the effect of our acquisition of Fords Gin, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and (c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The decrease in underlying net sales was driven by lower volumes of Chambord in the United Kingdom as COVID-19 had a further adverse effect on results in the fourth quarter.
Non-branded and bulk reported net sales declined 30%, while underlying net sales decreased 29% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange. Declines were driven by lower volumes and prices for used barrels along with a decrease in bulk whiskey sales.

The Jack Daniel’s RTDs/RTP brands grew volume 9%, reported net sales 15%, and underlying net sales 14% in fiscal 2018. JD RTDs’ underlying net sales growth was driven by higher prices in Australia and consumer-led volumetric gains and product innovation in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

Gentleman Jack grew volumes 7% in fiscal 2018 and surpassed 600 thousand nine-liter cases entering its 30th year of production. The brand grew reported net sales 9% and underlying net sales 7%, driven by volumetric growth in the United States and Travel Retail, as increased media propelled stronger sales in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017.

Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire grew volumes 14%, reported net sales 20%, and underlying net sales 15% in fiscal 2018. Underlying net sales growth was led by the United States, along with expansion into Brazil and Chile. JDTF has grown volumes each year since its introduction in late fiscal 2015.
Our Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands reported net sales grew 26% and underlying net sales increased 13%, fueled by the launch of JDTR in the fall of 2017.
Woodford Reserve grew volumes 23% in fiscal 2018 (after growing 18% in fiscal 2017 and 26% in fiscal 2016) and was once again selected as an Impact’s “Hot Brand.”1In addition, reported net sales increased 26% and underlying net sales grew 22% in fiscal 2018. The United States is by far the brand’s most important market and was responsible for most of its growth during fiscal 2018. However, the brand continued its momentum outside the United States, growing volumes 21%, driven by Travel Retail. We believe Woodford Reserve is the leading super-premium American whiskey globally, and is poised for continued growth as interest in bourbon continues to increase around the world. During fiscal 2018, Woodford Reserve became the official sponsor of the Kentucky Derby. We plan to continue devoting substantial resources to Woodford Reserve to support its growth potential, including sustained advertising and capital investments.
Finlandia grew volumes 2% in fiscal 2018, while reported net sales increased 10%, and underlying net sales grew 5% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in Russia. The increase in underlying net sales was driven predominantly by higher prices in Russia, which was partly attributed to import duties resulting from a change in our route-to-consumer.
el Jimador grew volumes 8% in fiscal 2018, while reported net sales increased 14%, and underlying net sales were up 9% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange due to the weakening of the dollar against the Mexican peso and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in the United States. Underlying net sales growth was driven by higher volumes in the United States, where el Jimador remained on the Impact’s “Hot Brands” list1 in calendar 2017.
Herradura grew volumes 15% in fiscal 2018, while reported net sales increased 17%, and underlying net sales were up 19% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange due to the weakening of the dollar against the Mexican peso and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories in the United States. This growth was driven primarily by increased volumes and higher prices in the brand’s largest markets, the United States and Mexico. Mexico also benefited from consumer-led volumetric growth of Herradura Ultra, our “cristalino” tequila expression released in fiscal 2015. We remain focused on developing Herradura in the United States (where we continue to see considerable potential for growth), strengthening our position in Mexico, and continuing to build our presence in higher-value tequila markets throughout the world.










  
1Impact Databank published the Impact’s “Hot Brands - Spirits” list in March 2018.2020.
2IWSR, 2019 data.


Year-Over-Year Comparisons
Commentary below compares fiscal 2020 to fiscal 2019 results. A comparison of fiscal 2019 to fiscal 2018 results may be found in “Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2019.
Net Sales
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 30 2018  2017
Change in reported net sales 8%  (3%)
Acquisitions and divestitures %  3%
Foreign exchange (1%)  2%
Estimated net change in distributor inventories (1%)  1%
Change in underlying net sales 6%  3%
      
Change in underlying net sales attributed to:     
Volume5%  2% 
Net price/mix2%  2% 
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding     
COVID-19 adversely affected our results during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020. See “Significant Developments - COVID-19” above for more information around the impact of COVID-19 on our results.
Fiscal 2018 compared to Fiscal 2017
Net Sales
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 302020
Change in reported net sales1%
Foreign exchange1%
Estimated net change in distributor inventories(2%)
Change in underlying net sales%
Change in underlying net sales attributed to:
Volume(1%)
Net price/mix1%
Note: Results may differ due to rounding
Net sales of $3,248 million$3.4 billion increased 8%1%, or $254$39 million, in fiscal 20182020 compared to fiscal 2017. After2019. Underlying net sales were flat after adjusting reported results for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories (primarily as a result of distributors in the United States building their inventory levels in April 2020 due to the uncertainty around potential supply chain disruptions resulting from COVID-19) and the negative effect of foreign exchange. Flat underlying net sales grew 6%. The positive effectcomprised 1% volume decline, which was offset by 1% price/mix. Volume declines were led by JDTW, Finlandia, and our tequila brands, partially offset by the launch of foreign exchangeJDTA along with higher volumes of Woodford Reserve and JDTH. Price/mix was driven primarily by (a) faster growth from our higher-priced brands (Woodford Reserve and the dollar’s weakening againstJack Daniel’s family of brands) and declines of our lower-priced brands (Finlandia) and (b) higher pricing on tequilas. This price/mix benefit was partially offset by lower net pricing of JDTW. See “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2020 Market Highlights and Fiscal 2020 Brand Highlights” above for details on the euro, Polish zloty, and Mexican peso. Offactors contributing to the 6% change in underlying net sales 5% was attributable to volume growth and nearly 2% was attributable tofor fiscal 2020, including the positive impact of price/mix. Volume growth was led by the Jack Daniel's family of brands, tequilas, and premium bourbons. Improved price/mix was driven by (a) an increase in the share of sales of higher margin brands, most notably the Jack Daniel’s family of brands and Woodford Reserve, and (b) higher average pricing on JD RTDs and tequilas.
The primary factors contributing to underlying net sales growth were:
our American whiskey portfolio in the United States, led by Woodford Reserve, JDTW, JDTH, JDTF, Old Forester, Gentleman Jack, and the launch of JDTR;
JDTW in the majority of international markets, most notably Brazil, Poland, Turkey, France, Travel Retail, Germany, and Australia;
JD RTDs, led by volumetric gains and product innovation in Australia, Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom;
our tequila brands, led by (1) volume gains and higher prices of New Mix in Mexico, (2) higher volumes of Herradura and el Jimador in the United States, and (3) higher volumes of Herradura, notably Herradura Ultra, in Mexico;
Finlandia in Russia;
used barrel volume growth; and
Woodford Reserve outside of the United States, driven by Travel Retail.
The primary factors partially offsetting underlying net sales growth were declines of:
Korbel Champagne volumes in the United States;
contract bottling sales; and
Canadian Mist volumes in the United States.
Fiscal 2017 compared to Fiscal 2016
Net sales of $2,994 million decreased 3%, or $95 million, in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016. After adjusting reported results for (a) the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and (c) the estimated net decrease in distributor inventories, underlying net sales grew 3%. The negative effect of foreign exchange was driven primarily by the dollar’s strengthening against the Mexican peso, euro, and British pound. The change in underlying net sales was driven almost equally by the positive impact of price/mix and volume growth. Volume growth was led by the Jack Daniel's family of brands and the tequilas, partially offset by declines in Canadian Mist. Improved price/mix was driven by (a) higher average pricing on JDTW and the tequilas, and (b) a shift in sales out of lower-priced brands (most notably, Canadian Mist) to higher priced brands (most notably, Jack Daniel's family of brands and Woodford Reserve); these gains were partially offset by declines in used barrel sales.

The primary factors contributing to underlying net sales growth were:
our American whiskey portfolio in the United States, led by JDTW, Woodford Reserve, Old Forester, and Gentleman Jack;
JDTW in several international markets, most notably Poland, France, the United Kingdom, Japan, Mexico, and Travel Retail;
our tequila brands, led by (1) higher prices and volume gains of New Mix in Mexico, (2) higher volumes of Herradura and el Jimador in the United States, and (3) higher volumes and price increases of Herradura in Mexico;
JD RTDs, partially due to new product introductions, led by Mexico, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Australia;
Sonoma-Cutrer and Korbel Champagne in the United States;
JDTF driven by launches in Germany, France, and Travel Retail; and
Woodford Reserve outside of the United States, driven by distribution expansion in Travel Retail.
The primary factors partially offsetting underlying net sales growth were declines of:
used barrel sales, reflecting lower prices due to increased supply of used barrels and somewhat weaker demand from blended Scotch industry buyers;
JDTW in Belgium, Southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, China, and Turkey;
Canadian Mist volumes in the United States; and
lower-margin agency brands that we no longer distribute.COVID-19.
Cost of Sales
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 30 2018  2017
Change in reported cost of sales 7%  3%
Acquisitions and divestitures 1%  %
Foreign exchange %  %
Estimated net change in distributor inventories (1%)  1%
Change in underlying cost of sales 8%  4%
      
Change in underlying cost of sales attributed to:     
Volume5%  2% 
Cost/mix3%  3% 
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
     
Cost of Sales
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 302020
Change in reported cost of sales7%
Foreign exchange1%
Estimated net change in distributor inventories(1%)
Change in underlying cost of sales7%
Change in underlying cost of sales attributed to:
Volume(1%)
Cost/mix7%
Note: Results may differ due to rounding
Fiscal 2018 compared to Fiscal 2017
Cost of sales of $1,046 million$1.2 billion increased $73$78 million, or 7%, in fiscal 20182020 compared to fiscal 2017.2019. Underlying cost of sales also grew 8%7% after adjusting reported costs for (a) the net effect of our Scotch acquisition and the absence of sales related to our TSA for Southern Comfort and Tuaca and (b) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The increase in underlying costs of sales was driven by higher volumes and an increase in input costs, including wood and agave. Looking ahead to fiscal 2019, we currently expect that input costs will increase in the mid-single digits.
Fiscal 2017 compared to Fiscal 2016
Cost of sales of $973 million increased $28 million, or 3%, in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016. Underlying cost of sales grew 4% after adjusting reported costs for the estimated net change in distributor inventories. The increase in underlying costs of sales was driven by higher volumes and an increase in input costs, including wood and grain.

Gross Profit
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 302018 2017
Change in reported gross profit9% (6%)
Acquisitions and divestitures% 4%
Foreign exchange(2%) 3%
Estimated net change in distributor inventories(1%) 1%
Change in underlying gross profit6% 3%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
   
Gross Margin
Fiscal year ended April 302018 2017
Prior year gross margin67.5% 69.4%
Price/mix0.3% 0.1%
Cost(0.7%) (0.4%)
Acquisitions and divestitures0.3% (0.9%)
Foreign exchange0.4% (0.7%)
Change in gross margin0.3% (1.9%)
Current year gross margin67.8% 67.5%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
   
Fiscal 2018 compared to Fiscal 2017
Gross profit of $2,202 million increased $181 million, or 9%, in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017. Gross profit on an underlying basis improved 6% after adjusting reported gross profit for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The increase in underlying gross profit resulted from the same factorscost of sales was driven by higher input costs of agave and wood along with tariff-related costs. We estimate that contributed toover one-third of the increase in underlying cost of sales was due to tariff-related costs.

Gross Profit
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 302020
Change in reported gross profit(2%)
Estimated net change in distributor inventories(2%)
Change in underlying gross profit(3%)
Note: Results may differ due to rounding
Gross Margin
Fiscal year ended April 302020
Prior year gross margin65.2%
Price/mix0.4%
Cost(1.5%)
Tariffs1
(0.9%)
Change in gross margin(2.0%)
Current year gross margin63.2%
Note: Results may differ due to rounding
1“Tariffs” include the combined effect of tariff-related costs, whether arising as a reduction of net sales partially offset by the same factors that drove higher underlyingor as an increase in cost of sales. See “Significant Developments - Tariffs” for details.
Gross profit of $2.1 billion decreased $39 million, or 2%, in fiscal 2020 compared to fiscal 2019. Underlying gross profit declined 3% after adjusting reported results for an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. Gross margin increaseddecreased to 67.8%63.2% in fiscal 2018, up 0.32020, down 2.0 percentage points from 67.5%65.2% in fiscal 2017.2019. The increasedecrease in gross margin was primarilydriven by higher input costs and tariff-related costs.
Operating Expenses
Percentage change versus the prior year period ended April 30
2020ReportedAcquisitions & DivestituresChambord ImpairmentForeign ExchangeUnderlying
Advertising(3%)%%1%(2%)
SG&A%(1%)%2%1%
Total operating expenses1
1%%(1%)%%
Note: Results may differ due to rounding     
1Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.
Operating expenses totaled $1.0 billion and increased $14 million, or 1%, in fiscal 2020 compared to fiscal 2019. Underlying operating expenses were flat after adjusting for the effect of the Chambord impairment.
Reported advertising expenses declined 3% in fiscal 2020 compared to fiscal 2019, while underlying advertising expenses decreased 2% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange. The decrease in underlying advertising expense was driven by the reduction in spending behind on-premise channel activities and various events and sponsorships that were canceled in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 due to (a) favorable price/mix, (b)COVID-19.
Reported SG&A expenses were flat in fiscal 2020 compared to fiscal 2019, while underlying SG&A increased 1% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange and (c) the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, partially offset by an increase in underlying cost of sales.
Fiscal 2017 compared to Fiscal 2016
Gross profit of $2,021 million decreased $123 million, or 6%, in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016. Gross profit on an underlying basis improved 3% after adjusting reported gross profit for(a) the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and (c) the estimated net change in distributor inventories.The increase in underlying gross profit resulted from the same factors that contributed to the increase in underlying net sales, partially offset by the same factors that drove higher underlying cost of sales.
Gross margin decreased to 67.5% in fiscal 2017, down 1.9 percentage points from 69.4% in fiscal 2016. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to (a) the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and (c) an increase in underlying cost of sales.

Operating Expenses
Percentage change versus the prior year period ended April 30
2018ReportedAcquisitions & DivestituresFoundationForeign Exchange Underlying
Advertising8%%%(3%) 6%
SG&A15%%(11%)(2%) 3%
Total operating expenses1
13%%(7%)(2%) 4%
       
2017      
Advertising(8%)8%%2% 2%
SG&A(3%)%%1% (2%)
Total operating expenses1
(6%)3%%2% (1%)
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding      
1Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.

Fiscal 2018 compared to Fiscal 2017
Operating expenses totaled $1,163 million and increased $131 million, or 13%, in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017. Underlying operating expenses grew 4% after adjusting for the establishment of the Foundation and the negative effect of foreign exchange.
Advertising expenses of $414 million increased $31 million, or 8%, in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017. Underlying advertising expenses increased 6% after adjusting reported results for the negative effect of foreign exchange. The increase in underlying advertising expense was driven by higher spending on (a) our American whiskey portfolio in the United States, including JDTW, Woodford Reserve, Gentleman Jack, and the launch of JDTR; (b) the continued rollout of Slane Irish Whiskey in the United States; and (c) the expansion of our single-malt Scotch brands.
SG&A expenses of $765 million increased $98 million, or 15%, in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017, while underlying SG&A increased 3% after adjusting reported results for the effect of our $70 million contribution to establish the Foundation and the negative effectacquisition of foreign exchange.Fords Gin. The increase in underlying SG&A was driven by higher incentive compensation expenses and strategic investments, including our new Spain distribution operation, partially offset by lower pension expense and continued tight management of discretionary spending.
personnel costs.
Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 1.3 percentage points to 35.8% in fiscal 2018, from 34.5% in fiscal 2017. Our operating expenses as a percentage of net sales increased driven by our $70 million contribution to establish the Foundation.
Fiscal 2017 compared to Fiscal 2016
Operating expenses totaled $1,032 million and decreased $64 million, or 6%, in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016. Underlying operating expenses declined 1% after adjusting for the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures and the positive effect of foreign exchange.
Advertising expenses of $383 million decreased $34 million, or 8%, in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016. Underlying advertising expenses increased 2% after adjusting reported results for the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures and the positive effect of foreign exchange. The increase in underlying advertising expense was driven by higher spending on (a) JDTW, due in part to the 150th anniversary of Jack Daniel’s Distillery, (b) JD RTDs, partially due to new innovations, and (c) the launch of JDTF outside the United States. These increases were partially offset by lower spending for JDTF in the United States following the national introduction in late fiscal 2015 and for Finlandia Vodka.
SG&A expenses of $667 million decreased $21 million, or 3%, in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016, while underlying SG&A dropped 2% after adjusting reported results for the positive effect of foreign exchange. The most significant contributors to the year-over-year decrease in underlying SG&A were lower compensation-related expenses and tight management of discretionary spending.
Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased 1.0 percentage point to 34.5% in fiscal 2017, from 35.5% in fiscal 2016. Our operating expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased driven by lower SG&A spend.


Operating Income
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 302018 2017
Change in reported operating income5% (35%)
Acquisitions and divestitures% 35%
Foundation7% %
Foreign exchange(2%) 4%
Estimated net change in distributor inventories(2%) 3%
Change in underlying operating income8% 7%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
   
Operating Income
Percentage change versus the prior fiscal year ended April 302020
Change in reported operating income(5%)
Chambord Impairment1%
Estimated net change in distributor inventories(3%)
Change in underlying operating income(6%)
Note: Results may differ due to rounding
Fiscal 2018 compared to Fiscal 2017
Operating income was $1,039 million$1.1 billion in fiscal 2018, an increase2020, a decrease of $50$53 million, or 5%, compared to fiscal 2017.2019. Underlying operating income growth was 8%declined 6% after adjusting for (a) the establishment of the Foundation, (b) the positive effect of foreign exchange, and (c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories driven primarily byand the United States. The same factors that contributed toeffect of the growth in underlying gross profit also contributed to the growth in underlying operating income, enhanced by meaningful operating expense leverage, as underlying SG&A spend grew 3% compared to underlying net sales growth of 6%.
Chambord impairment. Operating margin declined 1.02.0 percentage pointpoints to 32.0%32.4% in fiscal 20182020 from 33.0%34.4% in fiscal 2017. The decrease in2019. COVID-19 had an adverse effect on our operating margin was primarily due to the 2.2 percentage point effect of the establishment of the Foundation, partially offset by operatingfourth quarter and full-year results as discussed above.
Interest expense leverage.
Fiscal 2017 compared to Fiscal 2016
Operating income was $989(net) decreased $3 million, or 4%, in fiscal 2017, a decrease of $544 million, or 35%,2020 compared to fiscal 2016. Underlying operating income growth was 7% after adjusting for (a) the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and (c) the estimated net decrease in distributor inventories, driven primarily by the United States and Russia. The same factors that contributed to the growth in underlying gross profit also contributed to the growth in underlying operating income, enhanced by meaningful operating expense leverage, as SG&A spend declined and underlying advertising expenses grew 2% compared to underlying net sales growth of 3%.
Operating margin declined 16.6 percentage points to 33.0% in fiscal 2017 from 49.6% in fiscal 2016. The decrease in our operating margin was primarily due to the net 16.6 percentage point effect of acquisitions and divestitures and the negative effect of foreign exchange, partially offset by a reduction in SG&A spend.
Fiscal 2018 compared to Fiscal 2017
Interest expense (net) increased $6 million, or 9%, in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017,2019, due to a higherlower average long-termshort-term debt balance and a higherlower interest rate on our short-term borrowings.
Our effective tax rate for fiscal 20182020 was 26.6%18.0% compared to 28.3%19.8% in fiscal 2017.2019. The decrease in our effective tax rate was driven by an increase in the beneficial impact of foreign earnings at lower rates and an increase inincreased excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation partially offset by the net impact of the Tax Act.and increased benefits from foreign derived sales. See Note 1211 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.details.
Diluted earnings per share were $1.48$1.72 in fiscal 2018, up 8%2020, down 1% from $1.37$1.73 in fiscal 2017. This increase resulted from (a) an increase2019 as a reduction in reported operating income (net of a $0.10 decrease from the establishment of the Foundation) and (b) the benefit ofwas only partially offset by a lower effective tax rate.rate and a decline in non-operating postretirement expense.
Fiscal 2017 compared to Fiscal 2016
Interest expense (net) increased $12 million, or 29%, in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016,primarily due to our July 2016 issuance of €300 million 1.20% and £300 million 2.60% senior unsecured notes due on July 7, 2026, and July 7, 2028, respectively.
Our effective tax rates for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 were 28.3%. An increase in the tax benefit related to discrete items and the beneficial impact of the excess tax benefits from stock-based awards decreased our effective tax rate. These were offset by (a) the absence of the beneficial impact of the sale of the Southern Comfort and Tuaca business, (b) a decrease in the beneficial impact of foreign earnings at lower tax rates, and (c) an increase in foreign exchange gains in non-U.S. entities that were currently subject to U.S. tax.

Diluted earnings per share were $1.37 in fiscal 2017, down 34% from $2.09in fiscal 2016. This decrease resulted from the same factors that contributed to the decrease in reported operating income, including (a) the absence of the $0.70 gain from the sale of Southern Comfort and Tuaca in fiscal 2016, (b) the absence of net income contribution from those brands, and (c) higher interest expense in fiscal 2017, partially offset by a reduction in shares outstanding due to share repurchases.



Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our ability to generate cash from operations consistently is one of our most significant financial strengths. Our strong cash flows enable us to invest in our people, invest in our brands, invest in our assets, pay regular dividends, make strategic acquisitions that we believe will enhance shareholder value, repurchase shares of common stock, and, from time to time, pay special dividends. Investment-grade credit ratings (A1 by Moody’s, A by Fitch, and A- by Standard & Poor’s) provide us with financial flexibility when accessing global credit markets. We believe cash flows from operations are sufficient to meet our expected operating and capital requirements for the foreseeable future.
Cash Flow Summary
(Dollars in millions) 2016 2017 2018
Operating activities $524
 $639
 $632
Investing activities:      
Proceeds from sale of business 543
 
 
Acquisition of business 
 (307) 
Additions to property, plant, and equipment (108) (112) (127)
Other (2) (3) (1)
  433
 (422) (128)
Financing activities:      
Net change in short-term borrowings 80
 (122) (3)
Net proceeds from long-term debt 240
 717
 345
Acquisition of treasury stock (1,107) (561) (1)
Dividends paid (266) (274) (773)
Other (7) (45) (34)
  (1,060) (285) (466)
Foreign exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents (4) (13) 19
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $(107) $(81) $57
Fiscal 2018 compared to Fiscal 2017
(Dollars in millions) 2019 2020
Operating activities $800
 $724
Investing activities:    
Acquisition of business 
 (22)
Additions to property, plant, and equipment (119) (113)
Other 
 (6)
  (119) (141)
Financing activities:    
Net change in short-term borrowings (71) 178
Acquisition of treasury stock (207) (1)
Dividends paid (310) (325)
Other (11) (43)
  (599) (191)
Foreign exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents (14) (24)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents $68
 $368
Cash and cash equivalents increased $57$368 million in fiscal 2018,2020, compared to a decreasean increase of $81$68 million in fiscal 2017.2019. Cash provided by operations of $724 million was down $7$76 million from fiscal 2017, as2019, reflecting a $124 millionlarger increase in discretionary contributions to our pension plans was largely offset by higher earnings (net of a $70 million contribution to establish the Foundation)working capital and a $66 million decline in income tax payments. The decline in income tax payments reflects the impact of the contributions to the pension plans and charitable foundation and the lower federal tax rates resulting from the enactment of the Tax Act.earnings.
Cash used for investing activities was $128$141 million during fiscal 2018,2020, compared to $422$119 million for the prior year. The $294 million decrease largely reflects $307 million in cash paid to acquire BenRiach in June 2016, partially offset by a $15$22 million increase reflects our acquisition of The 86 Company in capital spending during the current year. The increase in capital spending is largely attributable to the construction of new distilleries and homeplaces for both Slane Irish Whiskey and Old Forester and to the modernization and automation of our Brown-Forman Cooperage operation.July 2019.
Cash used for financing activities was $466$191 million during fiscal 2018,2020, compared to $285$599 million for fiscal 2017.2019. The $181$408 million increasedecline largely reflects a special cash dividend payment of $481$249 million increase in April 2018, the repayment of $250 million of notes that matured in January 2018,net proceeds from short-term borrowings and a $122$206 million decrease in proceeds from long-term debt,share repurchases, partially offset by a $560$32 million declineincrease in share repurchasespayments for shares withheld from employees to satisfy their withholding tax obligations on stock-based awards, and a $119$15 million decreaseincrease in net repayments of short-term borrowings.dividend payments.
The impact on cash and cash equivalents as a result of exchange rate changes was an increasea decrease of $19$24 million for fiscal 2018,2020, compared to a declinedecrease of $13$14 million in the prior fiscal year.
Fiscal 2017A discussion of our cash flows for fiscal 2019 compared to Fiscal 2016
Cashfiscal 2018 may be found in “Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and cash equivalents declined $81 million during fiscal 2017, compared to a declineAnalysis of $107 million during fiscal 2016. Cash provided by operations during fiscal 2017 was $639 million, compared to $524 million in fiscal 2016. The $115 million increase in fiscal 2017 largely reflectedFinancial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the absence of a $125 million payment made during fiscal 2016 for estimated income taxes incurred on the sale of the Southern Comfort and Tuaca business. Cash used for investing activities was $422 million during fiscal 2017, an increase of $855 million over the $433 million in cash provided by investing activities during fiscal 2016. The

increase of $855 million primarily reflected the impact of the sale of the Southern Comfort and Tuaca business (for which we received cash of $543 million) in fiscal 2016 and the acquisition of BenRiach (for which we paid cash of $307 million) in fiscal 2017.
Cash used for financing activities was $285 million during fiscal 2017, compared to $1,060 million during fiscal 2016. The $775 million decrease in cash used for financing activities largely reflected a $546 million decrease in share repurchases and a $477 million increase in proceeds from long-term debt net of repayments, partially offset by a $202 million decline in net proceeds from short-term borrowings and the payment of $30 million in November 2016 to settle an obligation related to our acquisition of BenRiach. The impact on cash and cash equivalents as a result of exchange rate changes was a decline of $13 million for fiscal 2017, compared to a decline of $4 million in fiscal 2016.year ended April 30, 2019.
Capital Expenditures
Over the past several fiscal years, we accelerated our capital spending in order to build the production platform for our current and future growth. Capital expenditures in three fiscal years from 2016 through 2018 were, on average, 32% higher than the averageSources of the five fiscal years prior to 2016.Liquidity
We have invested capital to expand production capacity, to undertake new business initiatives, and to save costs.
Significant capacity expansion projects included (a) the expansion of our shipping warehouse facility and an additional warehouse for Jack Daniel's, (b) an expanded bottling facility and four new warehouses for Woodford Reserve, and (c) a new wood mill.
The integrated distillery and homeplaces projects for Old Forester and Slane Irish Whiskey were the major new business initiatives. The Slane Irish Whiskey consumer experience opened in the fall of 2017, and the distillery is expected to open in the summer of 2018. The Old Forester distillery is expected to open in June 2018.
The most significant cost-saving initiative was the ongoing automation project at our Brown-Forman Cooperage facility.
In fiscal 2019, we expect capital expenditures to be approximately $130 million. We expect capital expenditures in fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021 to remain elevated as we complete several key, multi-year projects.
Share Repurchase Programs
We have repurchased approximately 57.7 million shares of our common stock under three separate repurchase programs since the beginning of fiscal 2014. The following table summarizes information about those share repurchases by period.
  Shares Purchased Average Price Per Share, Including Brokerage Commissions Total Cost of Shares
Period Class A Class B Class A Class B (Millions)
May 1, 2013 – April 30, 2014 49,600
 1,666,081
 $27.22
 $27.62
 $47
May 1, 2014 – April 30, 2015 130,210
 12,618,378
 $36.09
 $36.14
 $461
May 1, 2015 – April 30, 2016 42,082
 28,403,893
 $38.17
 $38.79
 $1,104
May 1, 2016 – April 30, 2017 30,312
 14,756,628
 $38.77
 $37.75
 $558
  252,204
 57,444,980
     $2,170
The following table summarizes information about those share repurchases by program.
        
Average Price Per
Share, Including
 
Total Spent on
Stock Repurchase
Dates Shares Purchased Brokerage Commissions Program
Starting Ending Class A Class B Class A Class B (Millions)
October 2013 September 2014 94,926
 7,177,797
 $31.53
 $34.43
 $250
October 2014 March 2016 126,966
 32,598,022
 $36.72
 $38.21
 $1,250
April 2016 March 2017 30,312
 17,669,161
 $38.77
 $37.84
 $670
    252,204
 57,444,980
     $2,170

Liquidity
We continue to manage liquidity conservativelygenerate strong cash flow from operations, which enables us to meet current obligations, fund capital expenditures, sustain and grow ourpay growing regular dividends, and return cash to our shareholders from time to time through share repurchases and special dividends while reservingdividends. Our investment-grade credit ratings (A1 by Moody’s and A- by Standard & Poor’s) provide us with financial flexibility when accessing global credit markets and allow us to reserve adequate debt capacity for investment opportunities and unforeseen eventsevents.
The ongoing COVID-19 crisis has adversely affected our operations and acquisition opportunities.our financial results. To ensure uninterrupted business operations and to preserve adequate liquidity during these uncertain times, we have (a) managed our operating expenses closely and limited discretionary spending, (b) re-prioritized capital projects where prudent, and (c) actively managed our working capital, including availing ourselves of certain tax deferral programs as permitted under various government relief efforts. To support our business partners, we have extended additional credit to some of our customers who were most directly affected by the crisis. We continue to monitor closely the impact of the pandemic on our customers’ solvency and our ability to collect from them.
In addition to
Our cash flow from operations is supplemented by our cash and cash equivalent balances, we haveas well as access to severalother liquidity sources to supplement oursources. Cash and cash flow from operations. One of those sources is our $800 million commercial paper program that we regularly use to fund our short-term credit needs and to maintain our access to the capital markets. During fiscal 2017, our commercial paper borrowings averaged $576 million, with an average maturity of 31 days and an average interest rate of 0.69%. During fiscal 2018, our commercial paper borrowings averaged $485 million, with an average maturity of 31 days and an average interest rate of 1.39%. Commercial paper outstanding was $208equivalents were $307 million at April 30, 2017,2019, and $215$675 million at April 30, 2018.
On November 10, 2017, we entered an amended and restated five-year credit agreement with various U.S. and international banks. The credit agreement provides an $800 million unsecured revolving credit commitment that expires on November 10, 2022. This agreement amended and restated our previous credit agreement dated November 18, 2011. The new agreement does not contain any financial covenants.
The $800 million revolving credit facility is currently undrawn and supports our commercial paper program. Although unlikely, under extreme market conditions, one or more participating banks may not be able to fully fund its commitments under our credit facility. We believe the debt capital markets for bonds and private placements are accessible sources of long-term financing that could meet any additional liquidity needs. We believe our current liquidity position is sufficient to meet all of our future financial commitments.We have high credit standards when initiating transactions with counterparties, and we closely monitor our counterparty risks with respect to our cash balances and derivative contracts. If a counterparty’s credit quality were to deteriorate below our credit standards, we would expect either to liquidate exposures or require the counterparty to post appropriate collateral.2020.
As of April 30, 2018,2020, approximately 88%46% of our cash and cash equivalents were held by our foreign subsidiaries whose earnings we expect to reinvest indefinitely outside of the United States. With the enactment of the Tax Act, we are evaluatingWe continue to evaluate our global working capital requirementsfuture cash deployment and may changedecide to repatriate additional cash held by our current permanent reinvestment assertion in future periods.foreign subsidiaries, which may require us to provide for and pay additional taxes.
As announced on January 23, 2018, our Board of Directors approved a number of capital deployment actions aimed at benefiting shareholders, employees, and the community. As further described below, these actions included a stock split and a special dividend. Additionally, U.S. tax reform afforded usWe have an opportunity to tax-efficiently fund our pension plan and charitable giving programs$800 million commercial paper program that would have otherwise been funded in future years. We funded these actions with incremental debt (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information).
The stock split was effected in the form of a dividend on both Class A and Class B common stock, paid in shares of Class B common stock. For every four shares of either Class A or Class B common stock held, shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 7, 2018, received one share of Class B common stock, with any fractional shares paid in cash. The additional shares and cash for fractional shares were distributed to stockholders on February 28, 2018. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
In addition, the Board declared a special cash dividend of $1.00 per share on our Class A and Class B common stock. Stockholders of record on April 2, 2018, received the special cash dividend on April 23, 2018. The total amount of this special dividend was $481 million.
The Board also approved additional funding of $120 million for our U.S. pension plans, further strengthening an important employee retirement benefit. Further, with the goal of helpingwe regularly use to fund our ongoing philanthropic endeavorsshort-term operational needs. In the second half of March 2020, as the COVID-19 crisis fueled widespread economic uncertainty, the commercial paper market was disrupted. Despite the heightened volatility, we sustained our access to short-term funding in the communities wherecommercial paper market and expect to continue to be able to do so in the future. The outstanding commercial paper balances, interest rates, and maturities during the periods ended April 30, 2019 and 2020, are presented below.
(Amounts in millions)April 30, Fiscal Year Average
 2019 2020 2019 2020
Commercial paper outstanding$150
 $333
 $421
 $251
Interest rate2.60% 1.29% 2.33% 2.14%
Average days to maturity18 73 31
 35
Our commercial paper program is supported by available commitments under our employees live and work, we created and fundedcurrently undrawn $800 million bank credit facility that expires in November 2023. Although unlikely, continued disruption in global financial markets could impair the Foundation with a contributionability of $70 million in April 2018. The Foundation is expectedone or more participating banks to reduce ongoing expenses related tofund its commitments under our annual giving programs.credit facility.
As announced on May 24, 2018,21, 2020, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.158$0.1743 per share on our Class A and Class B common stock. Stockholders of record on June 6, 2018,8, 2020, will receive the dividend on July 3, 2018.1, 2020.
While we expect to meet our short-term liquidity needs largely through cash generated from operations and borrowings under our commercial paper program, a sustained market deterioration resulting in continued declines in net sales and profit could require us to evaluate alternative sources of liquidity. Despite recent disruptions, the debt capital markets are accessible sources of long-term financing that we believe could meet any additional liquidity needs.
We believe our current liquidity position, supplemented by our ability to generate positive cash flows from operations in the future, and our ample debt capacity enabled by our strong short-term and long-term credit ratings, will be sufficient to meet all of our future financial commitments.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of April 30, 2018,2020, we were not involved in any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.


Long-Term Obligations
We have long-term obligations related to contracts, leases, borrowing arrangements, and employee benefit plans that we enter into in the normal course of business (see Notes 4, 5, 6, 9 and 815 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The following table summarizes the amounts of those obligations as of April 30, 2018,2020, and the years when they are expected to be paid.1 We expect to meet these obligations with internally generated funds.
(Dollars in millions) Total 2019 2020-2021 2022-2023 After 2023 Total 2021 2022-2023 2024-2025 After 2025
Long-term debt $2,377
 $
 $
 $250
 $2,127
 $2,299
 $
 $250
 $300
 $1,749
Interest on long-term debt 1,327
 75
 150
 148
 954
 1,168
 74
 146
 136
 812
Tax Act repatriation tax2
 91
 7
 15
 15
 54
Tax Act repatriation tax 63
 6
 12
 26
 19
Grape purchases 33
 12
 15
 5
 1
 20
 11
 9
 
 
Operating leases 45
 18
 21
 5
 1
Postretirement benefits3
 8
 8
 n/a
 n/a
 n/a
Agave purchases4
 28
 n/a
 n/a
 n/a
 n/a
Leases 57
 17
 22
 9
 9
Postretirement benefits2
 25
 25
 n/a
 n/a
 n/a
Agave purchases3
 29
 n/a
 n/a
 n/a
 n/a
Total $3,909
 $120
 $201
 $423
 $3,137
 $3,661
 $133
 $439
 $471
 $2,589
1 
Excludes liabilities for tax uncertainties, as we cannot reasonably predict their ultimate amount or timing of settlement.
2 
Reflects our current estimates of amounts and timing of repatriation tax resulting from the Tax Act (discussed in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
3
As of April 30, 2018,2020, we have unfunded pension and other postretirement benefit obligations of $173$307 million. Because we cannot determine the specific periods in which those obligations will be funded, the table above reflects no amounts related to those obligations other than the $8$25 million of expected contributions in fiscal 2019.2021.
43 
As discussed in Note 45 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we have obligations to purchase agave, a plant whose sap forms the raw material for tequila. As of April 30, 2018,2020, based on current market prices, obligations under these contracts totaled $28$29 million. Because we cannot determine the specific periods in which those obligations will be paid, the above table reflects only the total related to those obligations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements reflect some estimates involved in applying the following critical accounting policies that entail uncertainties and subjectivity. Using different estimates or policies could have a material effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We have obtained most of our brands by acquiring other companies. When we acquire another company, we first allocate the purchase price to identifiable assets and liabilities, including intangible brand names and trademarks (“brand names”), based on estimated fair value. We then record any remaining purchase price as goodwill. We do not amortize goodwill or other intangible assets with indefinite lives. We consider all of our brand names to have indefinite lives.
We assess our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually. If an asset’s fair valueannually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Goodwill is less than its book value, we write it down to its estimated fair value. For goodwill, ifimpaired when the book valuecarrying amount of the related reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, in which case we measure for potential impairmentwrite down the goodwill by comparing the implied fair valueamount of the reporting unit’s goodwill, determined in the same manner as in a business combination,excess (limited to the goodwill’s book value.carrying amount of the goodwill). We estimate the reporting unit’s fair value using discounted estimated future cash flows or market information. Similarly, a brand name is impaired when its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, in which case we write down the brand name to its estimated fair value. We typically estimate the fair value of a brand name using either the “relief from royalty” or “excess earnings” method. We also consider market values for similar assets when available. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value, including making assumptions about future cash flows, net sales, discount rates, and royalty rates.
We have the option, before quantifying the fair value of a reporting unit or brand name, to evaluate qualitative factors to assess whether it is more likely than not that our goodwill or brand names are impaired. If we determine that is not the case, then we are not required to quantify the fair value. That assessment also takes considerable management judgment.
During fiscal 2018, we recorded a $2 million impairment charge related to the write-off of the carrying amount of an immaterial discontinued brand name. Based on our assumptions, we believe neithernone of our goodwill noror other intangibles are impaired. Further, we estimate the fair values toof goodwill and other intangible assets substantially exceed their carrying amounts, except for our Chambord brand name. As of April 30, 2020, the carrying valuesamount of the Chambord brand name was $104 million.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $13 million for our goodwillChambord brand name. The impairment reflects a decline in our long-term outlook for Chambord, which has a significant on-premise presence and all other intangible assets.

is expected to be considerably affected by the closures and restrictions in this channel in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We determined Chambord’s fair value based on the relief from royalty method, using current assumptions. Reasonably possible changes in those assumptions could result in additional non-cash impairment charges in the future. For example, we estimate that (a) a 10% decline in projected future net sales would result in an impairment charge of approximately $9 million and (b) a 1 percentage point increase in the discount rate would result in an impairment charge of approximately $18 million.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
We sponsor various defined benefit pension plans as well asand postretirement plans providing retiree health care and retiree life insurance benefits. Benefits are based on factors such as years of service and compensation level during employment. We expense the benefits expected to be paid over employees’ expected service. This requires us to make assumptions to determine the net benefit expensecosts and obligations, such as interestdiscount rates, return on plan assets, the rate of salary increases, expected service, and health care cost trend rates. We review these assumptions annually and modify them based on current rates and trends when appropriate. The assumptions also reflect our historical experience and management’s best judgment regarding future expectations. We believe the discount rates and and expected return on plan assets are the most significant assumptions.
The assets, obligations, and assumptionsdiscount rate used to measure pension and retiree medical costs arethe benefit obligations is determined at the beginning of each fiscal year using a yield curve based on the year (“measurement date”). Because obligationsinterest rates of high-quality debt securities with maturities corresponding to the expected timing of our benefit payments. The service cost and interest cost components are measured on a discounted basis,by applying the discount rate is a significant assumption. It is based on interestspecific spot rates for high-quality, long-term corporate debt at each measurement date.along that yield curve. The expected return on pension plan assets reflects expected capital market returns for each asset class that are based on historical returns, adjusted for the expected effects of diversification and active management (net of fees) of the assets. The other assumptions also reflect our historical experience and management’s best judgment regarding future expectations.
Beginning in fiscal 2018, we changed the method used to estimate the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost for our U.S. pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The new estimation approach discounts the individual expected cash flows underlying the service cost and interest cost using the applicable spot rates derived from the yield curve used to discount the cash flows used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. Previously, we estimated these service and interest cost components using a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. We believe the new approach provides a more precise measurement of service and interest costs by improving the correlation between projected benefit cash flows to the corresponding spot yield curve rates. We accounted for this change in estimate prospectively, beginning May 1, 2017. The new approach does not affect the measurement of our plan obligations, but generally results in lower service cost and interest cost in periods when the yield curve is upward-sloping. For fiscal 2018, the new estimation approach reduced total service and interest cost by approximately $7 million when compared to the cost computed using the prior approach.
The following table compares the assumed discount rates and expected return on assets used in determining net periodic benefit cost for fiscal 20182020 to those to be used in determining that cost for fiscal 2019.2021.

 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2018 2019 2018 2019
Discount rate for service cost4.29% 4.30% 4.39% 3.90%
Discount rate for interest cost3.40% 3.93% 3.35% 4.34%
Expected return on plan assets6.75% 6.50% n/a
 n/a
The changes in discount rates reflect changes in the yield curve since the prior measurement date. The decrease in expected return on assets reflects lower capital market return expectations for our current asset allocation.
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2020 2021 2020 2021
Discount rate for service cost4.17% 3.49% 4.24% 3.59%
Discount rate for interest cost3.57% 2.56% 3.53% 2.47%
Expected return on plan assets6.50% 6.50% n/a
 n/a
Using these assumptions, we estimate our pension and other postretirement benefit cost for fiscal 20192021 will be approximately $32$33 million, compared to $34$29 million for fiscal 2018.2020. Decreasing/increasing the assumed discount rates by 50 basis points would increase/decrease the total fiscal 20192021 cost by approximately $7$5 million. Decreasing/increasing the assumed return on plan assets by 50 basis points would increase/decrease the total fiscal 20192021 cost by approximately $4 million.
Income Taxes
Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions. We establish liabilities when some positions are likely to be challenged and may not succeed, despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable. We adjust these liabilities in light of changing circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit. We believe current liabilities are appropriate for all known contingencies, but this situation could change.
Years can elapse before we can resolve a particular matter for which we may have established a tax liability. Although predicting the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter can be difficult, we believe our liabilities reflect the likely outcome of known tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue could require use of our cash.cash and increase our effective tax rate. Conversely, a favorable resolution could result in reduced cash tax payments, the reversal of previously established liabilities, or some combination of these results, which could reduce our effective tax rate.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Act, which significantly changes U.S. corporate income taxes. Due to the complexity involved in applying the provisions of the Tax Act, we have made reasonable estimates of the effects and recorded provisional amounts in our financial statements as of and for the year ended April 30, 2018. As we complete our analysis

of the Tax Act and incorporate additional guidance that may be issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the IRS, and other standard-setting bodies, we may adjust the recorded provisional amounts in subsequent reporting periods. Those adjustments may materially impact our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate in the period in which the adjustments are made. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about the Tax Act.
NewUpdated Accounting PronouncementsStandards
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about updated accounting pronouncementsstandards that we have recently adopted and about new accounting pronouncements that we will adopt in future periods.adopted.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Risk Management FrameworkMarket risks
Success in business requires risk-taking, but we must balance risk and reward appropriately. Our enterprise risk management process is intended to ensure that we take risks knowingly and thoughtfully and that we balance potential risks and rewards. Our integrated enterprise risk management framework is designed to identify, evaluate, communicate, and appropriately mitigate risks across our operations. Within this framework:
Our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing our enterprise risk assessment and mitigation processes and procedures. The Board itself oversees some strategic enterprise risks and delegates responsibility for other risks to committees that report to the Board regularly on matters within their purview, and to management.
The Audit Committee oversees policies and processes related to enterprise risk management, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and financial reporting and accounting control risks.
The Compensation Committee periodically reviews our compensation policies and practices to assess whether they could lead to unnecessary risk taking.
Our Enterprise Risk Management Committee, composed of managers from an array of levels, functions, and geographies, reports to the Board at least annually. It leads our risk management program globally, which systematically identifies and evaluates the major risks we face, identifies people responsible for managing each risk, ensures that risk mitigation plans are in place and, together with internal audit, verifies that mitigation plans are being followed.
Our Risk Management function identifies and assesses potential operational hazards and safety and security risks, and facilitates ongoing communication about those risks with the Enterprise Risk Management Committee and our executive leaders. Within Risk Management, our crisis management team facilitates simulations with the appropriate function and executive leaders to increase awareness and preparedness.
Our Internal Audit Department evaluates the ongoing effectiveness of our key internal controls through periodic audit and review procedures.
The Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer helps ensure that all of our employees’ actions globally comply with all applicable laws, our Code of Conduct, and our internal policies. The Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer reports the status of our compliance efforts four times a year to the Audit Committee.
Market Risks
We are exposed toface market risks arising from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, affecting the cost of our raw materials and energy, and interest rates. We trymanage market risks through procurement strategies as well as the use of derivative and other financial instruments. Our risk management program is governed by policies that authorize and control the nature and scope of transactions that we use to mitigate market risks. Our policy permits the use of derivative financial instruments to mitigate market risks but prohibits their use for speculative purposes.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk. Foreign currency fluctuations affect our net investments in foreign subsidiaries and foreign currency-denominated cash flows. In general, we expect our cash flows to be negatively affected by a stronger dollar and positively affected by a weaker dollar. Our most significant foreign currency exposures include the euro, the British pound, the Australian dollar, the Polish zloty, the Mexican peso, and the Russian ruble. We manage risk responsiblyour foreign currency exposures through derivative financial instruments, principally foreign currency forward contracts, and debt denominated in foreign currency. We had outstanding currency derivatives with notional amounts totaling $1,241 million and $1,026 million at April 30, 2019 and 2020, respectively.
We estimate that a hypothetical 10% weakening of the dollar compared to exchange rates of hedged currencies as of April 30, 2020, would decrease the fair value of our then-existing foreign currency derivative contracts by approximately $75 million. This hypothetical change in fair value does not consider the expected inverse change in the underlying foreign currency exposures.
Commodity price risk. Commodity price changes can affect our production and supply chain costs. Our most significant commodities exposures include corn, malted barley, rye, natural gas, agave, and wood. We manage certain exposures through a varietycombination of strategies, including production initiativespurchase orders and hedging. Our foreign currency hedging contracts are subject to exchangelong-term supply contracts.
Interest rate risk. Interest rate changes our commodity forward purchase contracts are subject to commodity price changes, and someaffect (a) the fair value of our fixed-rate debt, obligationsand (b) cash flows and earnings related to our variable-rate debt and interest-bearing investments. In addition to currently outstanding debt, any potential future debt offerings are subject to interest rate risk. Our interest rate exposures include U.S. Treasury rates, European Central Bank rates, British government rates, and LIBOR.
As of April 30, 2020, our cash and cash equivalents ($675 million) and short-term borrowings ($333 million) were exposed to interest rate changes. Below, we discussBased on the then-existing balances of these exposures and provideitems, a sensitivity analysis as to how these changes could affect our results of operations. hypothetical one percentage point increase in interest rates would result in a negligible decrease in net interest expense.
See Notes 613 and 714 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” (the Consolidated Financial Statements) for additional information.
details on our foreign currency exchange rate risk. See Note 45 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on our grape and agave purchase obligations, which are exposed to commodity price risk, and “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a discussion of our pension and other postretirement plans’ exposure to interest rate risks. Also see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for details on how economic conditions affecting market risks also affect the demand for and pricing of our products and how we are affected by exchange rate fluctuations.
Foreign Exchange. The more we expand our business outside the United States, the more our financial results will be exposed to exchange rate fluctuations. This exposure includes sales of our products in currencies other than the dollar and the cost of goods, services, and manpower we purchase in currencies other than the dollar. Because we sell more in local currencies than we purchase, we have a net exposure to changes in the dollar’s value. Foreign exchange rates also affect the carrying value of our foreign-currency-denominated assets and liabilities. To buffer these exchange rate fluctuations, we regularly hedge a portion of our foreign currency exposure. But over the long term, our reported financial results will generally be negatively affected by a stronger dollar and positively affected by a weaker dollar.
We estimate that our foreign currency revenue will exceed our foreign currency expenses by $807 million in fiscal 2019. We hedge those currencies considered to be significant exposures based on value at risk; the estimated transactional exposure for the hedged currencies is $734 million.
We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge a portion of our transactional foreign exchange risk and, in some circumstances, our net asset exposure. If these contracts remain effective, we will not recognize any unrealized gains or losses until we either recognize the underlying hedged transactions in earnings or convert the underlying hedged net asset exposures. At April 30, 2018, our total foreign currency hedges had a notional value of $1,098 million, with a maximum term outstanding of 36 months, and were recorded as a net liability at their fair value of $38 million.
As of April 30, 2018, we hedged 64% of the estimated fiscal 2019 transactional exposure for hedged currencies by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. Considering these hedges and spot rates as of April 30, 2018 compared to fiscal 2018’s effective exchange rates, we expect a modest negative effect to our fiscal 2019 operating income. We estimate that a 10% increase/decrease in the average value of the dollar in fiscal 2019 relative to spot rates as of April 30, 2018 would decrease/increase our fiscal 2019 operating income by approximately $35 million.
Commodity Prices. Commodity prices are affected by weather, supply and demand, as well as geopolitical and economic variables. To reduce price volatility, we use deliverable contracts for corn (in which we take physical delivery of the corn underlying each contract) rather than futures contracts or options.
Interest Rates. As of April 30, 2018, our cash and cash equivalents ($239 million) and variable-rate debt ($215 million) are exposed to the risk of interest rate changes. Based on the net balance of these items, a 1% increase in interest rates would result in a negligible decrease in net interest expense.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data




Table of Contents
 Page





REPORTS OF MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTSReports of Management
Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements
Our management is responsible for preparing, presenting, and ensuring the preparation, presentation, and integrity of the financial information presented in this report. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, including amounts based on management’s best estimates and judgments. In management’s opinion, the consolidated financial statements fairly present the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, comprising only independent directors, meets regularly with our external auditors, the independent registered public accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC),; with our internal auditors,auditors; and with representatives of management to review accounting, internal control structure, and financial reporting matters. Our internal auditors and PwC have full, free access to the Audit Committee. As set forth in our Code of Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines, we are firmly committed to adhering to the highest standards of moral and ethical behavior in our business activities.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTINGManagement’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1934, as amended. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
As of the end of our fiscal year, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of April 30, 2018.2020. PwC, which audited and reported on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2018,2020, as stated in their report.
 
Dated:June 13, 201819, 2020  
  By:/s/ Paul C. VargaLawson E. Whiting
   Paul C. VargaLawson E. Whiting
   President and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company
    
    
  By:/s/ Jane C. Morreau
   Jane C. Morreau
   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer






Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Brown-Forman Corporation


Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brown-Forman Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of April 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended April 30, 2018,2020, including the related notes and financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying accountslisted in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) for each of the three years in the period ended April 30, 2018 appearing under Item 15(a)(2)2020 (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of April 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended April 30, 20182020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.


Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases on May 1, 2019.

Basis for Opinions


The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company's consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.


Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide

reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Quantitative Impairment Assessment of Brand Names Intangible Assets

As described in Notes 1 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the other intangible assets balance as of April 30, 2020 was $635 million. The balance consists of brand names and trademarks, with a significant portion relating to brand names, all of which are considered to have indefinite useful lives. The Company assesses its brand names for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. The Company has the option, before quantifying the fair value of brand names, to evaluate qualitative factors to assess whether it is more likely than not that the 3 brand names are impaired. If determined that is not the case, there is no requirement to quantify fair value. Where a quantitative assessment is performed, a brand name is impaired when its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, in which case management writes down the brand name to its estimated fair value. The fair value of a brand name is typically estimated using either the “relief from royalty” or “excess earnings” method. Management also considers market values for similar assets when available. As described in Note 1, considerable judgment is necessary to estimate fair value, including the selection of assumptions about future cash flows, discount rates, and royalty rates. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $13 million for its Chambord brand name. The Company determined Chambord’s fair value based on the relief from royalty method, using current assumptions.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the quantitative impairment assessment of brand names intangible assets is a critical audit matter are (i) there was significant judgment by management when developing the fair value measurements of the brand names, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in performing procedures to evaluate management’s fair value measurements and (ii) there was significant audit effort in performing procedures and evaluating the significant assumptions, including future cash flows, discount rates, and royalty rates. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s annual quantitative impairment analyses and periodic triggering event assessments for brand names, including controls over management’s determination of future cash flows, discount rates, and royalty rates. These procedures also included, among others, evaluating the appropriateness of the relief from royalty or excess earnings method and the reasonableness of significant assumptions used by management in developing the fair value measurements, including future cash flows, discount rates, and royalty rates. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the appropriateness of the valuation methodologies employed, as well as the reasonableness of the discount rates and royalty rates. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to the future cash flows involved evaluating whether the assumptions used were reasonable considering (i) the past performance of the brand names, (ii) the consistency with external industry and market data, and (iii) whether the assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
June 13, 201819, 2020


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1933.

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSBrown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
 
Year Ended April 30,2016 2017 20182018 2019 2020
Sales$4,011
 $3,857
 $4,201
$4,201
 $4,276
 $4,306
Excise taxes922
 863
 953
953
 952
 943
Net sales3,089
 2,994
 3,248
3,248
 3,324
 3,363
Cost of sales945
 973
 1,046
1,046
 1,158
 1,236
Gross profit2,144
 2,021
 2,202
2,202
 2,166
 2,127
Advertising expenses417
 383
 414
405
 396
 383
Selling, general, and administrative expenses688
 667
 765
765
 641
 642
Gain on sale of business(485) 
 
Other expense (income), net(9) (18) (16)(16) (15) 11
Operating income1,533
 989
 1,039
1,048
 1,144
 1,091
Non-operating postretirement expense9
 22
 5
Interest income2
 3
 6
(6) (8) (5)
Interest expense46
 59
 68
68
 88
 82
Income before income taxes1,489
 933
 977
977
 1,042
 1,009
Income taxes422
 264
 260
260
 207
 182
Net income$1,067
 $669
 $717
$717
 $835
 $827
Earnings per share:          
Basic$2.10
 $1.38
 $1.49
$1.49
 $1.74
 $1.73
Diluted$2.09
 $1.37
 $1.48
$1.48
 $1.73
 $1.72
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOMEBrown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in millions)


Year Ended April 30,2016 2017 2018
Net income$1,067
 $669
 $717
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Currency translation adjustments(23) (73) 24
Cash flow hedge adjustments(17) 
 (28)
Postretirement benefits adjustments(10) 33
 16
Net other comprehensive income (loss)(50) (40) 12
Comprehensive income$1,017
 $629
 $729
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
April 30,2017 2018
ASSETS   
Cash and cash equivalents$182
 $239
Accounts receivable, net557
 639
Inventories:   
Barreled whiskey873
 947
Finished goods186
 225
Work in process119
 117
Raw materials and supplies92
 90
Total inventories1,270
 1,379
Other current assets342
 298
Total current assets2,351
 2,555
Property, plant, and equipment, net713
 780
Goodwill753
 763
Other intangible assets641
 670
Deferred tax assets16
 16
Other assets151
 192
Total assets$4,625
 $4,976
LIABILITIES   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$501
 $581
Accrued income taxes9
 25
Short-term borrowings211
 215
Current portion of long-term debt249
 
Total current liabilities970
 821
Long-term debt1,689
 2,341
Deferred tax liabilities152
 85
Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits314
 191
Other liabilities130
 222
Total liabilities3,255
 3,660
Commitments and contingencies

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Common stock:   
Class A, voting, $0.15 par value (170,000,000 shares authorized)25
 25
Class B, nonvoting, $0.15 par value (400,000,000 shares authorized)43
 47
Additional paid-in capital65
 4
Retained earnings4,470
 1,730
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(390) (378)
Treasury stock, at cost (88,175,000 and 3,531,000 shares in 2017 and 2018, respectively)(2,843) (112)
Total stockholders’ equity1,370
 1,316
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$4,625
 $4,976

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
Year Ended April 30,2016 2017 2018
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$1,067
 $669
 $717
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:     
Gain on sale of business(485) 
 
Depreciation and amortization56
 58
 64
Stock-based compensation expense15
 14
 19
Deferred income taxes10
 (10) (69)
Other, net2
 2
 4
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of sale and acquisition of businesses:     
Accounts receivable8
 6
 (70)
Inventories(127) (86) (102)
Other current assets(57) 12
 29
Accounts payable and accrued expenses29
 (17) 58
Accrued income taxes7
 (11) 16
Noncurrent assets and liabilities(1) 2
 (34)
Cash provided by operating activities524
 639
 632
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Proceeds from sale of business543
 
 
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
 (307) 
Additions to property, plant, and equipment(108) (112) (127)
Computer software expenditures(2) (3) (1)
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities433
 (422) (128)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Net change in short-term borrowings80
 (122) (3)
Repayment of long-term debt(250) 
 (250)
Proceeds from long-term debt490
 717
 595
Debt issuance costs(5) (5) (6)
Net payments related to exercise of stock-based awards(17) (10) (28)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards15
 
 
Acquisition of treasury stock(1,107) (561) (1)
Dividends paid(266) (274) (773)
Repayment of short-term obligation associated with acquisition of business
 (30) 
Cash used for financing activities(1,060) (285) (466)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(4) (13) 19
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(107) (81) 57
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period370
 263
 182
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$263
 $182
 $239
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for:     
Interest$41
 $48
 $65
Income taxes$430
 $266
 $200
Year Ended April 30,2018 2019 2020
Net income$717
 $835
 $827
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Currency translation adjustments24
 (27) (94)
Cash flow hedge adjustments(28) 48
 30
Postretirement benefits adjustments16
 (6) (77)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)12
 15
 (141)
Comprehensive income$729
 $850
 $686
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYBrown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

millions)
 Class A Common Stock Class B Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings AOCI Treasury Stock Total
Balance at April 30, 2015$13
 $21
 $99
 $3,300
 $(300) $(1,228) $1,905
Net income      1,067
     1,067
Net other comprehensive income (loss)        (50)   (50)
Cash dividends ($0.524 per share)      (266)     (266)
Acquisition of treasury stock          (1,107) (1,107)
Stock-based compensation expense    15
       15
Stock issued under compensation plans          34
 34
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans    (15) (36)     (51)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards    15
       15
Balance at April 30, 201613
 21
 114
 4,065
 (350) (2,301) 1,562
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (Note 1)      10
     10
Stock split (Note 10)12
 22
 (34)       
Net income      669
     669
Net other comprehensive income (loss)        (40)   (40)
Cash dividends ($0.564 per share)      (274)     (274)
Acquisition of treasury stock          (561) (561)
Stock-based compensation expense    14
       14
Stock issued under compensation plans          19
 19
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans    (29)       (29)
Balance at April 30, 201725
 43
 65
 4,470
 (390) (2,843) 1,370
Retirement of treasury stock (Note 10)  (10) (8) (2,684)   2,702
 
Stock split (Note 10)  14
 (14)       
Net income      717
     717
Net other comprehensive income (loss)        12
   12
Cash dividends ($1.608 per share)      (773)     (773)
Acquisition of treasury stock          (1) (1)
Stock-based compensation expense    19
       19
Stock issued under compensation plans          30
 30
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans    (58)       (58)
Balance at April 30, 2018$25
 $47
 $4
 $1,730
 $(378) $(112) $1,316
April 30,2019 2020
Assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$307
 $675
Accounts receivable, net609
 570
Inventories:   
Barreled whiskey1,004
 1,092
Finished goods279
 320
Work in process152
 172
Raw materials and supplies85
 101
Total inventories1,520
 1,685
Other current assets283
 335
Total current assets2,719
 3,265
Property, plant, and equipment, net816
 848
Goodwill753
 756
Other intangible assets645
 635
Deferred tax assets16
 15
Other assets190
 247
Total assets$5,139
 $5,766
Liabilities   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$544
 $517
Accrued income taxes9
 30
Short-term borrowings150
 333
Total current liabilities703
 880
Long-term debt2,290
 2,269
Deferred tax liabilities145
 177
Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits197
 297
Other liabilities157
 168
Total liabilities3,492
 3,791
Commitments and contingencies


 


Stockholders’ Equity   
Common stock:   
Class A, voting, $0.15 par value (170,000,000 shares authorized; 170,000,000 shares issued)25
 25
Class B, nonvoting, $0.15 par value (400,000,000 shares authorized; 314,532,000 shares issued)47
 47
Retained earnings2,238
 2,708
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(363) (547)
Treasury stock, at cost (7,360,000 and 6,323,000 shares in 2019 and 2020, respectively)(300) (258)
Total stockholders’ equity1,647
 1,975
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$5,139
 $5,766


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in millions)


Year Ended April 30,2018 2019 2020
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$717
 $835
 $827
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:     
Non-cash intangible asset write-down
 
 13
Depreciation and amortization64
 72
 74
Stock-based compensation expense19
 14
 11
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)(69) 38
 39
U.S. Tax Act repatriation tax provision (benefit)91
 (4) 
Other, net(8) 8
 15
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of acquisition of business:     
Accounts receivable(70) 23
 12
Inventories(102) (162) (203)
Other current assets29
 30
 (27)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses58
 (43) (30)
Accrued income taxes8
 (16) 18
Other operating assets and liabilities(84) 5
 (25)
Cash provided by operating activities653
 800
 724
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
 
 (22)
Additions to property, plant, and equipment(127) (119) (113)
Payments for corporate-owned life insurance(21) (2) 
Proceeds from corporate-owned life insurance
 4
 
Computer software expenditures(1) (2) (6)
Cash used for investing activities(149) (119) (141)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Net change in short-term borrowings(3) (71) 178
Repayment of long-term debt(250) 
 
Proceeds from long-term debt595
 
 
Debt issuance costs(6) 
 
Payments of withholding taxes related to stock-based awards(28) (11) (43)
Acquisition of treasury stock(1) (207) (1)
Dividends paid(773) (310) (325)
Cash used for financing activities(466) (599) (191)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents19
 (14) (24)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents57
 68
 368
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period182
 239
 307
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$239
 $307
 $675
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for:     
Interest$65
 $90
 $83
Income taxes$200
 $201
 $143
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

 Class A Common Stock Class B Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings AOCI Treasury Stock Total
Balance at April 30, 2017$25
 $43
 $65
 $4,470
 $(390) $(2,843) $1,370
Retirement of treasury stock1
  (10) (8) (2,684)   2,702
 
Stock split2
  14
 (14)       
Net income      717
     717
Net other comprehensive income (loss)        12
   12
Cash dividends ($1.6080 per share)      (773)     (773)
Acquisition of treasury stock          (1) (1)
Stock-based compensation expense    19
       19
Stock issued under compensation plans          30
 30
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans    (58)       (58)
Balance at April 30, 201825
 47
 4
 1,730
 (378) (112) 1,316
Net income      835
     835
Net other comprehensive income (loss)        15
   15
Cash dividends ($0.6480 per share)      (310)     (310)
Acquisition of treasury stock          (207) (207)
Stock-based compensation expense    14
       14
Stock issued under compensation plans          19
 19
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans    (18) (12)     (30)
Other      (5)     (5)
Balance at April 30, 201925
 47
 
 2,238
 (363) (300) 1,647
Adoption of ASU 2018-02 (Note 1)      43
 (43)   
Net income      827
     827
Net other comprehensive income (loss)        (141)   (141)
Cash dividends ($0.6806 per share)      (325)     (325)
Acquisition of treasury stock          (1) (1)
Stock-based compensation expense    11
       11
Stock issued under compensation plans          43
 43
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans    (11) (75)     (86)
Balance at April 30, 2020$25
 $47
 $
 $2,708
 $(547) $(258) $1,975
1Retirement of 67 million shares of Class B common stock previously held as treasury shares.
2Stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend of one share of Class B common stock for every four shares of either Class A or Class B common stock.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.







Brown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars and other currency amounts in millions, except per share data)
 
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIESAccounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). We also apply the following accounting policies when preparing our consolidated financial statements:
Principles of consolidation. Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. We eliminate all intercompany transactions.
Estimates. To prepare financial statements that conform with GAAP, our management must make informed estimates that affect how we report revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities, including contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include bank demand deposits and all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Allowance for doubtful accounts. We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. When we are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations, we record a specific allowance to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount we believe will be collected. We write off the uncollectable amount against the allowance when we have exhausted our collection efforts. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $7 as of bothand $11 at April 30, 20172019 and 2018.2020, respectively.
Inventories. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Approximately 52%51% of our consolidated inventories are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) cost method, which we use for the majority of our U.S. inventories. We value the remainder of our inventories primarily using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost method. FIFO cost approximates current replacement cost. If we had used the FIFO method for all inventories, they would have been $272$303 and $290$311 higher than reported at April 30, 20172019 and 2018,2020, respectively.
Because we age most of our whiskeys in barrels for three3 to six6 years, we bottle and sell only a portion of our whiskey inventory each year. Following industry practice, we classify all barreled whiskey as a current asset. We include warehousing, insurance, ad valorem taxes, and other carrying charges applicable to barreled whiskey in inventory costs.
We classify bulk wine, agave inventories, tequila, and liquid in bottling tanks as work in process.
Property, plant, and equipment. We state property, plant, and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation. We calculate depreciation on a straight-line basis using our estimates of useful life, which are 2040 years for buildings and improvements; 310 years for machinery, equipment, vehicles, furniture, and fixtures; and 37 years for capitalized software.
We assess our property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. When we do not expect to recover the carrying value of an asset (or asset group) through undiscounted future cash flows, we write it down to its estimated fair value. We determine fair value using discounted estimated future cash flows, considering market values for similar assets when available.
When we retire or dispose of property, plant, and equipment, we remove its cost and accumulated depreciation from our balance sheet and reflect any gain or loss in operating income. We expense the costs of repairing and maintaining our property, plant, and equipment as we incur them.
Goodwill and other intangible assets. We have obtained most of our brands by acquiring other companies. When we acquire another company, we first allocate the purchase price to identifiable assets and liabilities, including intangible brand names and trademarks (“brand names”), based on estimated fair value. We then record any remaining purchase price as goodwill. We do not amortize goodwill or other intangible assets with indefinite lives. We consider all of our brand names to have indefinite lives.
We assess our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually. If an asset’s fair valueannually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Goodwill is less than its book value, we write it down to its estimated fair value. For goodwill, ifimpaired when the book valuecarrying amount of the related reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, in which case we measure for potential impairmentwrite down the goodwill by comparing the implied fair valueamount of the reporting unit’s goodwill, determined in the same manner as in a business combination,excess (limited to the goodwill’s book value.carrying amount of the goodwill). We estimate the reporting unit’s fair value using discounted estimated future cash flows or market information. Similarly, a brand name is impaired when its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, in which case we write down the brand name to its estimated fair value. We typically estimate the fair value of a brand name using either the “relief from royalty” or “excess earnings” method. We also consider market values for similar assets when available. Considerable

management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value, including the selection of assumptions about future cash flows, discount rates, and royalty rates.

We have the option, before quantifying the fair value of a reporting unit or brand name, to evaluate qualitative factors to assess whether it is more likely than not that our goodwill or brand names are impaired. If we determine that is not the case, then we are not required to quantify the fair value. That assessment also takes considerable management judgment.
Foreign currency transactions and translation. We report all gains and losses from foreign currency transactions (those denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency) in current income. The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for most of our consolidated entities. The local currency is the functional currency for some of our consolidated foreign entities. We translate the financial statements of those foreign entities into U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date to translate assets and liabilities, and using the average exchange rate for the reporting period to translate income and expenses. We record the resulting translation adjustments in other comprehensive income (loss).
Revenue recognition. Our net sales predominantly reflect global sales of beverage alcohol consumer products. We recognize salessell these products under contracts with different types of customers, depending on the market. The customer is most often a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer.
Each contract typically includes a single performance obligation to transfer control of the products to the customer. Depending on the contract, control is transferred when title and risk of loss passthe products are either shipped or delivered to the customer, at which point we recognize the transaction price for those products as net sales. The transaction price recognized at that point reflects our estimate of the consideration to be received in exchange for the products. The actual amount may ultimately differ due to the effect of various customer incentives and trade promotion activities. In making our estimates, we consider our historical experience and current expectations, as applicable. Subsequent adjustments recognized for changes in estimated transaction prices are typically when the product is shipped. We record sales net of estimated sales returns, allowances, and discounts. not material.
Net sales are further reduced by exciseexclude taxes that we collect from customers that are imposed by various governments on our sales, and are reduced by payments to customers unless made in exchange for distinct goods or services with fair values approximating the payments. Net sales include any amounts we bill customers for shipping and remithandling activities related to governmental authorities.the products. We recognize the cost of those activities in cost of sales during the same period in which we recognize the related net sales. Sales returns, which are permitted only in limited situations, are not material. Customer payment terms generally range from 30 to 90 days. There are no significant amounts of contract assets or liabilities.
Cost of sales. Cost of sales includes the costs of receiving, producing, inspecting, warehousing, insuring, and shipping goods sold during the period.
Shipping and handling fees and costs. We report the amounts we bill to our customers for shipping and handling as sales, and we report the costs we incur for shipping and handling as cost of sales.
Advertising costs. We expense the costs of advertising during the year when the advertisements first take place.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses include the costs associated with our sales force, administrative staff and facilities, and other expenses related to our non-manufacturing functions.
Stock-based compensation. We use stock-based awards as part of our incentive compensation for eligible employees and directors. We recognize the grant-date fair value of an award as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which typically corresponds to the vesting period for the award. Upon forfeiture of an award prior to vesting, we reverse any previously-recognized compensation expense related to that award. We classify stock-based compensation expense within selling, general, and administrative expenses.
As we recognize compensation expense for a stock-based award, we concurrently recognize a related deferred tax asset. The subsequent vesting or exercise of the award will generally result in an actual tax benefit that differs from the deferred tax asset that had been recorded. The excess (deficiency) of the actual tax benefit over (under) the previously-recorded tax asset is recognized as income tax benefit (expense) on the date of vesting or exercise.
Income taxes. We base our annual provision for income taxes on the pre-tax income reflected in our consolidated statement of operations. We establish deferred tax liabilities or assets for temporary differences between GAAP and tax reporting bases and later adjust them to reflect changes in tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. We record a valuation allowance as necessary to reduce a deferred tax asset to the amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. We do not provide deferred income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that we expect to permanently reinvest. We record a deferred tax charge in prepaid taxes for the difference between GAAP and tax reporting bases with respect to the elimination of intercompany profit in ending inventory.
We assess our uncertain income tax positions using a two-step process.in two steps. First, we evaluate whether the tax position will more likely than not, based on its technical merits, be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation. For a tax position that does not meet this first criterion, we recognize no tax benefit. For a tax position that does meet the first criterion, we recognize a tax benefit in an amount equal to the largest amount of benefit that we believe has more than a 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. We record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as income tax expense.
Recently adopted

Foreign currency transactions and translation. We report all gains and losses from foreign currency transactions (those denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency) in current income. The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for most of our consolidated entities. The local currency is the functional currency for some of our consolidated foreign entities. We translate the financial statements of those foreign entities into U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date to translate assets and liabilities, and using the average exchange rate for the reporting period to translate income and expenses. We record the resulting translation adjustments in other comprehensive income (loss).
Adoption of updated accounting pronouncements. Westandards. Effective May 1, 2019, we adopted the following Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) as of May 1, 2016:Board:
ASU 2015-072016-02: Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share.Leases. This new standard amends the previous disclosure guidance related to investments measured at net asset value. Under the new standard, investments measured at net asset value as a practical expedient are no longer categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
ASU 2016-09: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This new guidance amends certain aspects of the accounting for stock-based compensation, including the income tax consequences. Under the new guidance, we recognize all tax benefits related to stock-based compensation as an income tax benefit in our statement of operations, and include all income tax cash flows within operating activities in our statement of cash flows. Under the previous accounting guidance, we recognized some of those tax benefits (excess tax benefits) as additional paid-in capital and classified that amount as a financing activity in our statement of cash flows. We adopted these provisions of the new guidance on a prospective basis as of May 1, 2016. As a result, our net income and operating cash flows include excess tax benefits of $9 for fiscal 2017 and $18 for fiscal 2018. Prior period financial statements have not been adjusted.
Also, under the new guidance, we recognize the excess tax benefits during the period in which the related awards vest or are exercised. Under the previous accounting guidance, we recognized those benefits during the period in which they reduced taxes payable. We adopted this provision of the new guidance on a modified retrospective basis with a cumulative-effect adjustment of $10 to retained earnings as of May 1, 2016.

New accounting pronouncements to be adopted. We will adopt the following ASUs as of May 1, 2018:
ASU 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This new standard,update, codified along with various amendments as Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842 (ASC 842), replaces existing revenue recognition guidance. The core principle of the standard requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard also requires significantly more financial statement disclosures than existing revenue standards do.
We have substantially completed our comprehensive assessment of the impact of the new guidance, and have concluded that adoption will not have a material impact on our financial statements. However, under the new standard, we will estimate and recognize the cost of certain customer incentives earlier than previously recognized. Although we expect this change in timing to shift the recognition of these costs among fiscal quarters, we do not expect the full-year impact to be significant. Additionally, some payments to customers that were previously classified as advertising or selling, general, and administrative expenses will be classified as reductions of sales under the new standard. We anticipate the impact of this change in classification to be insignificant as well.
We will adopt the new standard using the modified retrospective method by recognizing the cumulative effect of applying the new standard as an adjustment to retained earnings as of May 1, 2018. We anticipate the adjustment, reflecting the accelerated recognition of the cost of certain customer incentives, to decrease retained earnings by approximately $30 (net of tax). We are in the process of finalizing the calculation of the adjustment, which will be completed during the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
ASU 2016-15: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This new guidance addresses eight specific issues related to the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. We expect the impact of the new guidance to be limited to a change in classification of cash payments for premiums on corporate-owned life insurance policies, which we currently reflect in operating activities. Under the new guidance, we plan to reflect those payments as investing activities. Upon adopting this new guidance, we will retrospectively adjust prior year cash flow statements to conform to the new classification. As a result, we expect to reclassify payments (from operating activities to investing activities) of approximately $17 and $21 for fiscal 2017 and 2018, respectively.
ASU 2016-16: Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This revised guidance requires the recognition of the income tax consequences (expense or benefit) of an intercompany transfer of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. It maintains the existing requirement to defer the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intercompany transfer of inventory until the inventory is sold to an outside party. The guidance is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment, which we anticipate will increase retained earnings and decrease other liabilities by $27 as of May 1, 2018.
ASU 2017-04: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This updated guidance eliminates the second step of the existing two-step quantitative test of goodwill for impairment. Under the new guidance, the quantitative test will consist of a single step in which the carrying amount of the reporting unit will be compared to its fair value. An impairment charge would be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the amount of the impairment would be limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The guidance does not affect the existing option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine whether the quantitative impairment test is necessary. We do not expect adoption of the new standard, which is to be applied prospectively, to have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2017-07: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. This new guidance addresses the presentation of the net periodic cost (NPC) associated with pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The guidance requires the service cost component of the NPC to be reported in the income statement in the same line item(s) as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of the NPC are to be presented separately from the service cost and outside of income from operations. In addition, the guidance allows only the service cost component of NPC to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. It is to be applied retrospectively for the presentation in the income statement and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of service cost. We estimate that the retrospective application will increase previously-reported operating income for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 by approximately $21 and $9, respectively. As the retrospective application will merely reclassify amounts from operating income to non-operating expense, there will be no effect on previously-reported net income or earnings per share.

In addition, the FASB has issued the ASUs described below that we are not required to adopt until May 1, 2019 (although early adoption is permitted). We are currently evaluating their potential impact on our financial statements.
ASU 2016-02: Leases. This new standard replaces existingprevious lease accounting guidance. Under the new standard,ASC 842, a lessee should recognize on its balance sheet a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The standard permits an entity to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less. The standard also requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about leasing arrangements. It is to be appliedWe adopted ASC 842 using a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the adoption-period financial statements. We will adopt this standard as of May 1, 2019.
ASU 2017-12: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. This new guidance is intended to better align hedge accounting with an entity’s risk management activities and improve disclosures about hedges. The guidance expands hedge accounting for financial and nonfinancial risk components, eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness, simplifies the way assessments of hedge effectiveness may be performed, and amends some presentation and disclosure requirements for hedges. It is to be applied using a modified retrospective transition approach for cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption. For the transition, we elected to use the package of practical expedients to not reassess (a) whether existing contracts are or contain leases, (b) the classification of existing leases, and (c) initial direct costs for existing leases. Upon adoption, we recorded lease liabilities and right-of-use assets of $54. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. Weadoption did not have not yet determineda material impact on our plansresults of operations, stockholders’ equity, or cash flows. See Note 15 for adoption, but are considering the possibility of adopting this new guidance before the required adoption date.
additional information about our leases.
ASU 2018-02: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.Income (AOCI). This new guidance would allowallows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive incomeAOCI to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted by the U.S. government in December 2017. It isWe elected to be applied either inmake the periodreclassification, which increased retained earnings and decreased AOCI as of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. We have not yet determined our plans for adoption, but are considering the possibility of adopting this new guidance before the required adoption date.
May 1, 2019, by $43.
There are no other new accounting standards or updates to be adopted that we currently believe might have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
2. BALANCE SHEET INFORMATIONBalance Sheet Information
Supplemental information on our year-end balance sheets is as follows:
April 30,2019 2020
Other current assets:   
Prepaid taxes$191
 $195
Other92
 140
 $283
 $335
Property, plant, and equipment:   
Land$82
 $82
Buildings617
 652
Equipment769
 814
Construction in process57
 41
 1,525
 1,589
Less accumulated depreciation709
 741
 $816
 $848
Accounts payable and accrued expenses:   
Accounts payable, trade$150
 $131
Accrued expenses:   
Advertising and promotion160
 135
Compensation and commissions84
 71
Excise and other non-income taxes63
 80
Other87
 100
 394
 386
 $544
 $517
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:   
Currency translation adjustments$(207) $(302)
Cash flow hedge adjustments31
 60
Postretirement benefits adjustments(187) (305)
 $(363) $(547)
April 30,2017 2018
Other current assets:   
Prepaid taxes$210
 $196
Other132
 102
 $342
 $298
Property, plant, and equipment:   
Land$81
 $82
Buildings497
 568
Equipment659
 725
Construction in process96
 61
 1,333
 1,436
Less accumulated depreciation620
 656
 $713
 $780
Accounts payable and accrued expenses:   
Accounts payable, trade$137
 $154
Accrued expenses:   
Advertising and promotion111
 136
Compensation and commissions97
 99
Excise and other non-income taxes61
 77
Other95
 115
 364
 427
 $501
 $581


3. Earnings per Share

We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share further includes the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation awards. We calculate that dilutive effect using the “treasury stock method” (as defined by GAAP).
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETSThe following table presents information concerning basic and diluted earnings per share:
 2018 2019 2020
Net income available to common stockholders$717
 $835
 $827
Share data (in thousands):     
Basic average common shares outstanding480,319
 478,956
 477,765
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards3,929
 3,111
 2,644
Diluted average common shares outstanding484,248
 482,067
 480,409
      
Basic earnings per share$1.49
 $1.74
 $1.73
Diluted earnings per share$1.48
 $1.73
 $1.72

We excluded common stock-based awards for approximately 805,000 shares, 447,000 shares, and 301,000 shares from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively, because they were not dilutive for those periods under the treasury stock method.

4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table shows the changes in goodwill (which include no accumulated impairment losses) and other intangible assets over the past two years:
 Goodwill Other Intangible Assets
Balance as of April 30, 2018$763
 $670
Foreign currency translation adjustment(10) (25)
Balance as of April 30, 2019753
 645
Acquisition of business (Note 12)11
 12
Foreign currency translation adjustment(8) (9)
Impairment
 (13)
Balance as of April 30, 2020$756
 $635
 Goodwill Other Intangible Assets
Balance as of April 30, 2016$590
 $595
Acquisition of business (Note 16)183
 65
Foreign currency translation adjustment(20) (19)
Balance as of April 30, 2017753
 641
Foreign currency translation adjustment10
 31
Impairment
 (2)
Balance as of April 30, 2018$763
 $670

Our other intangible assets consist of trademarks and brand names, all with indefinite useful lives.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018,2020, we recordedrecognized a $2non-cash impairment charge relatedfor our Chambord brand name. The impairment reflects a decline in our long-term outlook for Chambord, which has a significant on-premise presence and is expected to be considerably affected by the closures and restrictions in this channel in response to the write-offCOVID-19 pandemic. The impairment charge of $13 is included in “other expense (income), net” in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. As of April 30, 2020, the remaining carrying amount of an immaterial discontinuedthe Chambord brand name.name was $104.
4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES5. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments. We made rental payments for real estate, vehicles, and office, computer, and manufacturing equipment under operating leases of $23, $23, and $26 during 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. We have commitments related to minimum lease payments of $18 in 2019, $13 in 2020, $8 in 2021, $4 in 2022, $1 in 2023, and $1 after 2023.
We have contracted with various growers and wineries to supply some of our future grape and bulk wine requirements. Many of these contracts call for prices to be adjusted annually up or down, according to market conditions. Some contracts set a fixed purchase price that might be higher or lower than prevailing market prices. We have total purchase obligations related to both types of contracts of $12$11 in 2019, $9 in 2020,2021, $6 in 2021, $42022, and $3 in 2022, $1 in 2023, and $1 after 2023.
We also have contracts for the purchase of agave, which is used to produce tequila. These contracts provide for prices to be determined based on market conditions at the time of harvest, which, although not specified, is expected to occur over the next 10 years. As of April 30, 2018,2020, based on current market prices, obligations under these contracts total $28.$29.
Contingencies. We operate in a litigious environment, and we are sued in the normal course of business. Sometimes plaintiffs seek substantial damages. Significant judgment is required in predicting the outcome of these suits and claims, many of which take years to adjudicate. We accrue estimated costs for a contingency when we believe that a loss is probable and we can make a reasonable estimate of the loss, and then adjust the accrual as appropriate to reflect changes in facts and circumstances. We do not believe it is reasonably possible that these existing loss contingencies, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. No material accrued loss contingencies are recorded as of April 30, 2018.2020.
On May 30, 2019, we notified Bacardi Martini Ltd. (“Bacardi”) of our intention not to renew the terms of our United Kingdom (U.K.) Cost Sharing Agreement (the “Agreement”) whereby Bacardi provided certain services (e.g., warehousing and logistics, sales, reporting, treasury, tax and other services) and Brown-Forman and Bacardi split the associated overhead for those services. For purposes of conducting business, Brown-Forman and Bacardi established a U.K. trade name, “Bacardi Brown-Forman Brands,” through which our products and Bacardi’s products were sold in the U.K. On a monthly basis, Bacardi would remit to us the revenues from sales of our products, net of our agreed contributions for overhead costs under the Agreement. On April 30, 2020, the Agreement expired according to its terms.
Following delivery of our notice and upon expiration of the Agreement, Bacardi alleged that it was entitled to approximately £49 under the principle of commercial agency in the U.K. For the first two monthly settlements following expiration of the Agreement, Bacardi withheld over £34 owed to us, effectively bypassing the dispute resolution process under the Agreement. Additionally, Bacardi informed us that it will continue to withhold amounts owed to us under future monthly settlements to conclude activity under the Agreement until its stated claim for £49 is satisfied.
Since it was raised, we have disputed Bacardi’s claim of commercial agency compensation and issued a demand that Bacardi adhere to the dispute resolution process mandated by the Agreement and return the £34 that Bacardi wrongfully withheld from amounts owed to us. If the dispute resolution with Bacardi is unsuccessful then arbitration is required under the terms of the

Agreement. We cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible loss because Bacardi has not initiated arbitration and fully pleaded the basis of its claim.
Guaranty. We have guaranteed the repayment by a third-party importer of its obligation under a bank credit facility that it uses in connection with its importation of our products in Russia. If the importer were to default on that obligation, which we believe is unlikely, our maximum possible exposure under the existing terms of the guaranty would be approximately $9 (subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates). Both the fair value and carrying amount of the guaranty are insignificant.
As of April 30, 2018,2020, our actual exposure under the guaranty of the importer’s obligation is approximately $5. We also have accounts receivable from that importer of approximately $3$8 at that date,April 30, 2020, which we expect to collect in full.
Based on the financial support we provide to the importer, we believe it meets the definition of a variable interest entity. However, because we do not control this entity, it is not included in our consolidated financial statements.

5. DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES6. Debt and Credit Facilities
Our long-term debt (net of unamortized discounts and issuance costs) consisted of:
April 30,2019 2020
2.25% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2023$249
 $249
3.50% senior notes, $300 principal amount, due April 15, 2025297
 297
1.20% senior notes, €300 principal amount, due July 7, 2026333
 324
2.60% senior notes, £300 principal amount, due July 7, 2028383
 369
4.00% senior notes, $300 principal amount, due April 15, 2038293
 294
3.75% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2043248
 248
4.50% senior notes, $500 principal amount, due July 15, 2045487
 488
 $2,290
 $2,269
April 30,2017 2018
1.00% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2018$249
 $
2.25% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2023248
 248
3.50% senior notes, $300 principal amount, due April 15, 2025
 296
1.20% senior notes, €300 principal amount, due July 7, 2026324
 361
2.60% senior notes, £300 principal amount, due July 7, 2028383
 408
4.00% senior notes, $300 principal amount, due April 15, 2038
 293
3.75% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2043248
 248
4.50% senior notes, $500 principal amount, due July 15, 2045486
 487
 1,938
 2,341
Less current portion249
 
 $1,689
 $2,341

Debt payments required over the next five fiscal years consist of $0 in 2019, $0 in 2020, $0 in 2021, $0 in 2022, $250 in 2023, $0 in 2024, $300 in 2025, and $2,127$1,749 after 2023.2025.
The senior notes contain terms and covenants customary of these types of unsecured securities, including limitations on the amount of secured debt we can issue.
We issued senior, unsecured notes with an aggregate principal amount
Details of $300 in March 2018. Interest on these notes will accrue at a rate of 3.50% and be paid semiannually. As of April 30, 2018, the carrying amount of these notes was $296 ($300 principal, less unamortized discounts and issuance costs). These notes are due on April 15, 2025.
In addition, we issued senior, unsecured notes with an aggregate principal amount of $300 in March 2018. Interest on these notes will accrue at a rate of 4.00% and be paid semiannually. As of April 30, 2018, the carrying amount of these notes was $293 ($300 principal, less unamortized discounts and issuance costs). These notes are due on April 15, 2038.
As of April 30, 2017, our short-term borrowings of $211 included $208 of commercial paper, with an average interest rate of 1.04%, and an average remaining maturity of 22 days. As ofat April 30, 2018, our short-term borrowings consisted of $215 of commercial paper, with an average interest rate of 2.04%,2019 and an average remaining maturity of 23 days.2020, are presented below:
April 30,2019 2020
Commercial paper$150 $333
Average interest rate2.60% 1.29%
Average remaining days to maturity18 73

We have a committed revolving credit agreement with various U.S. and international banks for $800 that expires in November 2022.2023. At April 30, 2018,2020, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility.
6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
7. Common Stock
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis:
 2017 2018
April 30,
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Assets:       
Cash and cash equivalents$182
 $182
 $239
 $239
Currency derivatives25
 25
 1
 1
Liabilities:       
Currency derivatives10
 10
 39
 39
Short-term borrowings211
 211
 215
 215
Current portion of long-term debt249
 249
 
 
Long-term debt1,689
 1,752
 2,341
 2,386
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We categorize the fair values of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to determine

those values. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are:
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity.
We determine the fair values of our currency derivatives (forwards contracts) using standard valuation models. The significant inputs used in these models, which are readily available in public markets or can be derived from observable market transactions, include the applicable spot rates, forward rates, and discount rates. The discount rates are based on the historical U.S. Treasury rates. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
We determine the fair value of long-term debt primarily based on the prices at which similar debt has recently traded in the market and also considering the overall market conditions on the date of valuation. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
The fair values of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term borrowings approximate the carrying amounts due to the short maturities of these instruments.
We measure some assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. That is, we do not measure them at fair value on an ongoing basis, but we do adjust them to fair value in some circumstances (for example, when we determine that an asset is impaired). No material nonrecurring fair value measurements were required during the periods presented in these financial statements.

7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Our multinational business exposes us to global market risks, including the effect of fluctuations in currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates. We use derivatives to help manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. We formally document the purpose of each derivative contract, which includes linking the contract to the financial exposure it is designed to mitigate. We do not hold or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
We use currency derivative contracts to limit our exposure to the currency exchange risk that we cannot mitigate internally by using netting strategies. We designate most of these contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions (expected to occur within three years). We record all changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges (except any ineffective portion) in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) until the underlying hedged transaction occurs, at which time we reclassify that amount into earnings. We assess the effectiveness of these hedges based on changes in forward exchange rates. The ineffective portion of the changes in fair value of our hedges (recognized immediately in earnings) during the periods presented in this report was not material.
We had outstanding currency derivatives, related primarily to our euro, British pound, and Australian dollar exposures, with notional amounts totaling $1,188 and $1,098 at April 30, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
During fiscal 2017, we designated some currency derivative forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated long-term debt as after-tax net investment hedges of our investments in certain foreign subsidiaries. During fiscal 2018, we continued to designate some foreign currency-denominated debt for that purpose. Any change in value of the designated portion of the hedging instruments is recorded in AOCI, offsetting the foreign currency translation adjustment of the related net investments that is also recorded in AOCI. The amount of foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedges was $511 and $633 as of April 30, 2017 and 2018, respectively. Our net investment hedges are intended to mitigate foreign exchange exposure related to non-U.S. dollar net investments in certain foreign subsidiaries against changes in foreign exchange rates. There was no ineffectiveness related to our net investment hedges in any of the periods presented.
We do not designate some of our currency derivatives and foreign currency-denominated debt as hedges because we use them to at least partially offset the immediate earnings impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on existing assets or liabilities. We immediately recognizeshows the change in fair value of these instruments in earnings.We use forward purchase contracts with suppliers to protect against corn price volatility. We expect to physically take delivery of the corn underlying each contract and use it for production over a reasonable period of time. Accordingly, we account for these contracts as normal purchases rather than as derivative instruments.
During May 2015, we entered into interest rate derivative contracts (U.S. Treasury lock agreements) to manage the interest rate risk related to the anticipated issuance of fixed-rate senior, unsecured notes. We designated the contracts as cash flow hedges of the future interest payments associated with the anticipated notes. Upon issuance in June 2015 of an aggregate principal amount of $500 of the 4.50% notes, due July 15, 2045, we settled the contracts for a gain of $8. The entire gain was recorded to AOCI and will be amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the life of the notes.
The following table presents the pre-tax impact that changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments and non-derivative hedging instruments had on AOCI and earningsoutstanding common shares (split-adjusted) during each of the last three years:
 Classification in Statement of Operations 2016 2017 2018
Derivative Instruments       
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:       
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCIn/a $22
 $41
 $(54)
Net gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earningsSales 60
 40
 (11)
Interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:       
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCIn/a 8
 
 
Currency derivatives designated as net investment hedge:       
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCIn/a 
 8
 
Currency derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:       
Net gain (loss) recognized in earningsSales 1
 2
 (5)
Net gain (loss) recognized in earningsOther income (5) (5) 9
Non-Derivative Hedging Instruments       
Foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedge:       
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCIn/a 
 2
 (41)
Foreign currency-denominated debt not designated as hedging instrument:       
Net gain (loss) recognized in earningsOther income 
 3
 (21)
(Shares in thousands)Class A Class B Total
Balance at April 30, 2017169,051
 311,055
 480,106
Acquisition of treasury stock(25) (6) (31)
Stock issued under compensation plans36
 890
 926
Balance at April 30, 2018169,062
 311,939
 481,001
Acquisition of treasury stock(145) (4,212) (4,357)
Stock issued under compensation plans82
 446
 528
Balance at April 30, 2019168,999
 308,173
 477,172
Acquisition of treasury stock(13) (3) (16)
Stock issued under compensation plans54
 999
 1,053
Balance at April 30, 2020169,040
 309,169
 478,209

We expect to reclassify $18 of deferred net losses on cash flow hedges recorded in AOCI as of April 30, 2018, to earnings during fiscal 2019. This reclassification would offset the anticipated earnings impact of the underlying hedged exposures. The actual amounts that we ultimately reclassify to earnings will depend on the exchange rates in effect when the underlying hedged transactions occur. The maximum term of outstanding derivative contracts was 36 months at both April 30, 2017 and 2018.


8. Net Sales

The following table presents the fair values ofshows our derivative instruments as of April 30, 2017 and 2018:net sales by geography:
 Balance Sheet Classification 
Fair Value of
Derivatives in a
Gain Position
 
Fair Value of
Derivatives in a
Loss Position
April 30, 2017     
Designated as cash flow hedges:     
Currency derivativesOther current assets $21
 $(2)
Currency derivativesOther assets 9
 (4)
Currency derivativesAccrued expenses 2
 (8)
Currency derivativesOther liabilities 1
 (4)
Not designated as hedges:     
Currency derivativesOther current assets 2
 (1)
Currency derivativesAccrued expenses 
 (1)
April 30, 2018     
Designated as cash flow hedges:     
Currency derivativesOther current assets 2
 (2)
Currency derivativesOther assets 1
 
Currency derivativesAccrued expenses 4
 (23)
Currency derivativesOther liabilities 2
 (18)
Not designated as hedges:     
Currency derivativesOther current assets 
 
Currency derivativesAccrued expenses 1
 (5)
 2018 2019 2020
United States$1,529
 $1,563
 $1,690
Developed International1
908
 917
 901
Emerging2
575
 597
 572
Travel Retail3
139
 140
 125
Non-branded and bulk4
97
 107
 75
 $3,248
 $3,324
 $3,363
The fair values reflected in
1Represents net sales of branded products to “advanced economies” as defined by the above tableInternational Monetary Fund (IMF), excluding the United States. Our largest developed international markets are presented on a gross basis. However,the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, France, Japan, and Canada.
2Represents net sales of branded products to “emerging and developing economies” as discussed further below,defined by the fair valuesIMF. Our largest emerging markets are Mexico, Poland, and Russia.
3Represents net sales of those instruments subjectbranded products to global duty-free customers, other travel retail customers, and the U.S. military regardless of customer location.
4Includes net settlement agreements are presented on a net basis in our balance sheets.sales of used barrels, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling regardless of customer location.
In our statement of cash flows, we classify cash flows related to cash flow hedges in the same category as the cash flows from the hedged items.
Credit risk. We are exposed to credit-related losses if the counterparties to our derivative contracts default. This credit risk is limited to the fair value of the contracts. To manage this risk, we contract only with major financial institutions that have earned investment-grade credit ratings and with whom we have standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements that allow for net settlement of the derivative contracts. Also, we have established counterparty credit guidelines that are regularly monitored, and we monetize contracts when we believe it is warranted. Because of these safeguards, we believe we have no derivative positions that warrant credit valuation adjustments.
Some of our derivative instruments require us to maintain a specific level of creditworthiness, which we have maintained. If our creditworthiness were to fall below that level, then the counterparties to our derivative instruments could request immediate payment or collateralization for derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with creditworthiness requirements that were in a net liability position was $9 and $38 at April 30, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
Offsetting. As noted above, our derivative contracts are governed by ISDA agreements that allow for net settlement of derivative contracts with the same counterparty. It is our policy to present the fair values of current derivatives (that is, those with a remaining term of 12 months or less) with the same counterparty on a net basis in the balance sheet. Similarly, we present the fair values of noncurrent derivatives with the same counterparty on a net basis. Current derivatives are not netted with noncurrent derivatives in the balance sheet.


The following table summarizes the gross andshows our net amounts of our derivative contracts:sales by product category:
 
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)
 
Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet
 
Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet
 
Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet
 Net Amounts
April 30, 2017         
Derivative assets$35
 $(10) $25
 $(1) $24
Derivative liabilities(20) 10
 (10) 1
 (9)
April 30, 2018         
Derivative assets10
 (9) 1
 (1) 
Derivative liabilities(48) 9
 (39) 1
 (38)
 2018 2019 2020
Whiskey1
$2,533
 $2,595
 $2,671
Tequila2
247
 263
 275
Wine3
187
 187
 186
Vodka4
130
 126
 109
Rest of portfolio54
 46
 47
Non-branded and bulk5
97
 107
 75
 $3,248
 $3,324
 $3,363
No cash collateral was received or pledged related to our derivative contracts as
1Includes all whiskey spirits and whiskey-based flavored liqueurs, ready-to-drink, and ready-to-pour products. The brands included in this category are the Jack Daniel's family of April 30, 2017 or 2018.brands, Woodford Reserve, Canadian Mist, GlenDronach, BenRiach, Glenglassaugh, Old Forester, Early Times, Slane Irish Whiskey, and Coopers' Craft.
2Includes el Jimador, Herradura, New Mix, Pepe Lopez, and Antiguo.
3Includes Korbel Champagne and Sonoma-Cutrer wines.
4Includes Finlandia.
5Includes net sales of used barrels, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling regardless of customer location.

8. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
9. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
We sponsor various defined benefit pension plans as well as postretirement plans providing retiree health care and retiree life insurance benefits. Below, we discuss our obligations related to these plans, the assets dedicated to meeting the obligations, and the amounts we recognized in our financial statements as a result of sponsoring these plans.
 
Obligations. We provide eligible employees with pension and other postretirement benefits based on factors such as years of service and compensation level during employment. The pension obligation shown below (“projected benefit obligation”) consists of: (a) benefits earned by employees to date based on current salary levels (“accumulated benefit obligation”); and (b) benefits to be received by employees as a result of expected future salary increases. (The obligation for medical and life insurance benefits is not affected by future salary increases.) The following table shows how the present value of our obligationprojected benefit obligations changed during each of the last two years.
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2019 2020 2019 2020
Obligation at beginning of year$903
 $908
 $50
 $50
Service cost24
 24
 1
 1
Interest cost34
 31
 2
 1
Net actuarial loss (gain)28
 108
 
 2
Retiree contributions
 
 1
 1
Benefits paid(81) (66) (4) (4)
Obligation at end of year$908
 $1,005
 $50
 $51
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2017 2018 2017 2018
Obligation at beginning of year$898
 $893
 $56
 $52
Service cost26
 24
 1
 1
Interest cost35
 29
 2
 1
Net actuarial loss (gain)(14) 2
 
 (1)
Plan amendments1
 6
 (4) 
Retiree contributions
 
 1
 1
Benefits paid(53) (51) (4) (4)
Obligation at end of year$893
 $903
 $52
 $50

Service cost represents the present value of the benefits attributed to service rendered by employees during the year. Interest cost is the increase in the present value of the obligation due to the passage of time. Net actuarial loss (gain) is the change in value of the obligation resulting from experience different from that assumed or from a change in an actuarial assumption. (We discuss actuarial assumptions used at the end of this note.) Plan amendments may also change the value of the obligation.
As shown in the previous table, the change in the value of our pension and other postretirement benefit obligations also includes the effect of benefit payments and retiree contributions. Expected benefit payments (net of retiree contributions) over the next 10 years are as follows:
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
2021$62
 $3
202262
 3
202362
 3
202463
 3
202563
 3
2026 – 2030425
 16

 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
2019$57
 $3
202058
 3
202159
 3
202261
 3
202362
 3
2024 – 2028322
 17

Assets. We invest in specific assets to fund our pension benefit obligations. Our investment goal is to earn a total return that, over time, will grow assets sufficiently to fund our plans’ liabilities, after providing appropriate levels of contributions and accepting prudent levels of investment risk. To achieve this goal, plan assets are invested primarily in funds or portfolios of funds managed by outside managers. Investment risk is managed by company policies that require diversification of asset classes, manager styles, and individual holdings. We measure and monitor investment risk through quarterly and annual performance reviews, and through periodic asset/liability studies.
Asset allocation is the most important method for achieving our investment goals and is based on our assessment of the plans’ long-term return objectives and the appropriate balances needed for liquidity, stability, and diversification. As of April 30, 2018,2020, our target asset allocation is a mix of 40% public equity investments, 47% fixed income investments, and 13% alternative investments.


The following table shows the fair value of pension plan assets by category as of the end of the last two years. (Fair value levels are defined in Note 6.14.)
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
April 30, 2017       
April 30, 2019       
Equity securities$78
 $
 $
 $78
$79
 $
 $
 $79
Cash and temporary investments29
 
 
 29
Limited partnership interest1

 
 4
 4

 
 3
 3
$78
 $
 $4
 82
$108
 $
 $3
 111
Investments measured at net asset value:              
Commingled trust funds2:
              
Equity funds      206
      157
Fixed income funds      229
      370
Real estate funds      63
      66
Short-term investments      7
      23
Limited partnership interests3
      28
      27
Hedge funds4
      8
              
Total      $623
      $754
              
April 30, 2018       
April 30, 2020       
Equity securities$89
 $
 $
 $89
$80
 $
 $
 $80
Cash and temporary investments
 
 
 
Limited partnership interest1

 
 4
 4

 
 2
 2
$89
 $
 $4
 93
$80
 $
 $2
 82
Investments measured at net asset value:              
Commingled trust funds2:
              
Equity funds      226
      193
Fixed income funds      362
      370
Real estate funds      66
      68
Short-term investments      5
      4
Limited partnership interests3
      27
      32
Hedge funds4
      1
              
Total      $780
      $749
  
1 This limited partnership interest was initially valued at cost and has been adjusted to fair value as determined in good faith by management of the partnership using various factors, and does not meet the requirements for reporting at the net asset value (NAV). The valuation requires significant judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices and the inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of the investment.liquidity. This limited partnership has a term expiring in September 2020, although this period may be extended.
2 Commingled trust fund valuations are based on the NAV of the funds as determined by the fund administrators and reviewed by us. NAV represents the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus liabilities and divided by the number of shares or units outstanding. For primarily allGenerally, for commingled trust funds other than real estate, redemptions are permitted daily with no notice period. The real estate fund is redeemable quarterly with 110 daysdays’ notice.
3 These limited partnership interests were initially valued at cost and have been adjusted using NAV per audited financial statements. Investments are generally not eligible for immediate redemption and have original terms averaging 10 to 13 years, although those periods may be subsequently extended.
4 Hedge fund valuations are based primarily on the NAV of the funds as determined by fund administrators and reviewed by us. During our review, we determine whether it is necessary to adjust a valuation for inherent liquidity and redemption issues that may exist within a fund’s underlying assets or fund unit values.




The following table shows how the fair value of the Level 3 assets changed during each of the last two years. There were no transfers of assets between Level 3 and either of the other two levels.
 Level 3
Balance as of April 30, 2018$4
Sales and settlements(1)
Balance as of April 30, 20193
Sales and settlements(1)
Balance as of April 30, 2020$2

 Level 3
Balance as of April 30, 2016$5
Sales and settlements(1)
Balance as of April 30, 20174
Return on assets held at end of year1
Sales and settlements(1)
Balance as of April 30, 2018$4
The following table shows how the total fair value of all pension plan assets changed during each of the last two years. (We do not have assets set aside for postretirement medical or life insurance benefits.)
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2019 2020 2019 2020
Assets at beginning of year$780
 $754
 $
 $
Actual return on assets34
 39
 
 
Retiree contributions
 
 1
 1
Company contributions21
 22
 3
 3
Benefits paid(81) (66) (4) (4)
Assets at end of year$754
 $749
 $
 $
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2017 2018 2017 2018
Assets at beginning of year$594
 $623
 $
 $
Actual return on assets51
 53
 
 
Retiree contributions
 
 1
 1
Company contributions31
 155
 3
 3
Benefits paid(53) (51) (4) (4)
Assets at end of year$623
 $780
 $
 $

We currently expect to contribute $5$22 to our pension plans and $3 to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans during 2019.2021.
Funded status. The funded status of a plan refers to the difference between its assets and its obligations. The following table shows the funded status of our plans.
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
April 30,2019 2020 2019 2020
Assets$754
 $749
 $
 $
Obligations(908) (1,005) (50) (51)
Funded status$(154) $(256) $(50) $(51)

 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
April 30,2017 2018 2017 2018
Assets$623
 $780
 $
 $
Obligations(893) (903) (52) (50)
Funded status$(270) $(123) $(52) $(50)

The funded status reflected above includes obligations attributable to our non-qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan that is not funded with those plan assets presented above. However, we have set aside investments in corporate-owned life insurance policies to help cover these obligations. The value of those investments, which are included in “other assets” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, is $81 and $98 as of April 30, 2017 and 2018, respectively.


The funded status is recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:
  

Pension Benefits
 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
April 30, 2019 2020 2019 2020
Other assets $2
 $
 $
 $
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (6) (7) (3) (3)
Accrued postretirement benefits (150) (249) (47) (48)
Net liability $(154) $(256) $(50) $(51)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:        
Net actuarial gain (loss) $(298) $(394) $(10) $(11)
Prior service credit (cost) (8) (6) 10
 7
  $(306) $(400) $
 $(4)

  

Pension Benefits
 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
April 30, 2017 2018 2017 2018
Other assets $
 $26
 $
 $
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (5) (5) (3) (3)
Accrued postretirement benefits (265) (144) (49) (47)
Net liability $(270) $(123) $(52) $(50)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:        
Net actuarial gain (loss) $(322) $(291) $(13) $(10)
Prior service credit (cost) (4) (9) 17
 13
  $(326) $(300) $4
 $3
The following table compares our pension plans whose assets exceed their accumulated benefit obligations with those whose obligations exceed their assets. (As discussednoted above, we have no assets set aside for postretirement medical or life insurance benefits.)
 Plan Assets 
Accumulated
Benefit Obligation
 
Projected
Benefit Obligation
April 30,2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Plans with assets in excess of accumulated benefit obligation$754
 $625
 $668
 $613
 $752
 $698
Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of assets
 124
 136
 277
 156
 307
Total$754
 $749
 $804
 $890
 $908
 $1,005

 Plan Assets 
Accumulated
Benefit Obligation
 
Projected
Benefit Obligation
April 30,2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018
Plans with assets in excess of accumulated benefit obligation$48
 $780
 $47
 $669
 $48
 $754
Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of assets575
 
 729
 123
 845
 149
Total$623
 $780
 $776
 $792
 $893
 $903
Pension cost. The following table shows the components of the pension cost recognized during each of the last three years. The amount for each year includes amortization of the prior service cost/credit and net actuarial loss/gain included in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of the beginning of the year.
 Pension Benefits
 2018 2019 2020
Service cost$24
 $24
 $24
Interest cost29
 34
 31
Expected return on assets(41) (47) (46)
Amortization of:     
Prior service cost (credit)1
 1
 1
Net actuarial loss (gain)21
 19
 19
Settlement charge
 15
 1
Net cost$34
 $46
 $30
 Pension Benefits
 2016 2017 2018
Service cost$26
 $26
 $24
Interest cost35
 35
 29
Expected return on assets(40) (41) (41)
Amortization of:     
Prior service cost (credit)1
 1
 1
Net actuarial loss (gain)27
 25
 21
Settlement loss
 1
 
Net cost$49
 $47
 $34

The prior service cost/credit, which represents the effect of plan amendments on benefit obligations, is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of the employees expected to receive the benefits. The net actuarial loss/gain results from experience different from that assumed or from a change in actuarial assumptions (including the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets), and is amortized over at least that same period. The estimated amount of prior service cost and net actuarial loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into pension cost in 20192021 is $1 and $19,$27, respectively.


Other postretirement benefitbenefits cost. The following table shows the components of the postretirement medical and life insurance benefitbenefits cost that we recognized during each of the last three years.
 Medical and Life Insurance Benefits
 2018 2019 2020
Service cost$1
 $1
 $1
Interest cost1
 2
 1
Amortization of:     
Prior service cost (credit)(3) (3) (3)
Net actuarial loss (gain)1
 1
 1
Net cost$
 $1
 $
 Medical and Life Insurance Benefits
 2016 2017 2018
Service cost$1
 $1
 $1
Interest cost2
 2
 1
Amortization of:     
Prior service cost (credit)(2) (3) (3)
Net actuarial loss (gain)1
 1
 1
Net cost$2
 $1
 $

The estimated amount of prior service credit and net actuarial loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into postretirement medical and life insurance benefitbenefits cost in 20192021 is $3 and $1, respectively.
Other comprehensive income (loss). Prior service cost/credit and net actuarial loss/gain are recognized in other comprehensive income or loss (OCI) during the period in which they arise. These amounts are later amortized from accumulated OCI into pension and other postretirement benefit cost over future periods as described above. The following table shows the pre-tax effect of these amounts on OCI during each of the last three years.
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020
Prior service credit (cost)$(6) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Net actuarial gain (loss)10
 (41) (115) 1
 
 (2)
Amortization reclassified to earnings:           
Prior service cost (credit)1
 1
 1
 (3) (3) (3)
Net actuarial loss (gain)21
 34
 20
 1
 1
 1
Net amount recognized in OCI$26
 $(6) $(94) $(1) $(2) $(4)

 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018
Prior service credit (cost)$
 $(1) $(6) $
 $4
 $
Net actuarial gain (loss)(46) 24
 10
 1
 
 1
Amortization reclassified to earnings:           
Prior service cost (credit)1
 1
 1
 (2) (3) (3)
Net actuarial loss (gain)27
 26
 21
 1
 1
 1
Net amount recognized in OCI$(18) $50
 $26
 $
 $2
 $(1)
Assumptions and sensitivity. We use various assumptions to determine the obligations and cost related to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The weighted-average assumptions used in computing benefit plan obligations as of the end of the last two years were as follows:
 

Pension Benefits
 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2019 2020 2019 2020
Discount rate4.04% 3.28% 3.98% 3.17%
Rate of salary increase4.00% 4.00% n/a
 n/a
 

Pension Benefits
 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2017 2018 2017 2018
Discount rate4.09% 4.23% 4.04% 4.20%
Rate of salary increase4.00% 4.00% n/a
 n/a

 
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing benefit plan cost during each of the last three years were as follows:
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020
Discount rate for service cost4.29% 4.30% 4.17% 4.39% 4.34% 4.24%
Discount rate for interest cost3.40% 3.93% 3.57% 3.35% 3.90% 3.53%
Rate of salary increase4.00% 4.00% 4.00% n/a
 n/a
 n/a
Expected return on plan assets6.75% 6.50% 6.50% n/a
 n/a
 n/a
 Pension Benefits 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018
Discount rate for service cost4.09% 4.02% 4.29% 4.09% 3.96% 4.39%
Discount rate for interest cost4.09% 4.02% 3.40% 4.09% 3.96% 3.35%
Rate of salary increase4.00% 4.00% 4.00% n/a
 n/a
 n/a
Expected return on plan assets7.00% 7.00% 6.75% n/a
 n/a
 n/a

The assumed discount rates are determined using a yield curve based on the interest rates of high-quality debt securities with maturities corresponding to the expected timing of our benefit payments. Beginning in fiscal 2018, we changed the method used to estimate theThe service cost and interest cost for these benefit plans. The new estimation approach discountscomponents are measured by applying the individual expected cash flows underlying the service cost and interest cost using the applicablespecific spot rates derived from the yield curve used to discount the cash flows used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. Previously, we estimated these service and interest cost components using a single weighted-average discount rate derived fromalong the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. We believe the new approach provides a more precise measurement of service and interest costs by improving the correlation between projected benefit cash flows and the corresponding spot yield curve rates.

The assumed rate of salary increase reflects the expected average annual increase in salaries as a result of inflation, merit increases, and promotions over the service period of the plan participants.

The expected return on plan assets represents the long-term rate of return that we assume will be earned over the life of the pension assets. The assumption reflects expected capital market returns for each asset class, which are based on historical returns, adjusted for the expected effects of diversification and active management (net of fees).
The assumed health care cost trend rates as of the end of the last two years were as follows:
 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2019 2020
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year7.30% 6.90%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)5.00% 5.00%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate2025
 2025
 
Medical and Life
Insurance Benefits
 2017 2018
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year7.25% 7.70%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)5.00% 5.00%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate2025
 2025

A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would not have significantly changed the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of April 30, 2018,2020, or the aggregate service and interest costs for 2018.2020.
Savings plans. We also sponsor various defined contribution benefit plans that together cover substantially all U.S. employees. Employees can make voluntary contributions in accordance with their respective plans, which include a 401(k) tax deferral option. We match a percentage of each employee’s contributions in accordance with plan terms. We expensed $11, $11,$12, $12, and $12 for matching contributions during 20162018, 20172019, and 20182020, respectively.
International plans. The information presented above for defined benefit plans and defined contribution benefit plans reflects amounts for U.S. plans only. Information about similar international plans is not presented due to immateriality.
9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION10. Stock-Based Compensation
The Brown-Forman 2013 Omnibus Compensation Plan is our incentive compensation plan, designed to reward participants (including eligible officers, employees, and non-employee directors) for company performance. Under the Plan, we can grant stock-based incentive awards for up to 20,750,000 shares of common stock to eligible participants until July 28, 2023. As of April 30, 2018,2020, awards for approximately 14,791,00013,514,000 shares remain available for issuance under the Plan. We try to limit the source of shares delivered to participants under the Plan to treasury shares that we purchase from time to time on the open market (at times in(in connection with a publicly announced share repurchase program), in private transactions, or otherwise.
The following table presents information about stock options andAwards granted under the Plan include stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs) granted under the Plan (or its predecessor plans) as of April 30, 2018, restricted stock units (RSUs), and for the year then ended.deferred stock units (DSUs).
 
Number of
Underlying
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Award
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at April 30, 20178,278
 $25.74
    
Granted1,059
 39.07
    
Exercised(2,116) 17.11
    
Forfeited or expired(6) 36.05
    
Outstanding at April 30, 20187,215
 $29.67
 5.4 $190
Exercisable at April 30, 20184,335
 $23.17
 3.7 $142
The total intrinsic value of options and SSARs exercised during 2016, 2017, and 2018 was $47, $28, and $73, respectively.

SSARs. We grant stock options and SSARs at an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the underlying stock on the grant date. Stock options and SSARs become exercisable after three years from the first day of the fiscal year of grant and expire generally are exercisable for seven years after that date. The grant-date fair valuesfollowing table presents information about SSARs outstanding as of these awards granted during 2016, 2017,April 30, 2020, and 2018 were $7.62, $5.73, and $6.79 per award, respectively. for the year then ended.
 
Number of
SSARs
(in thousands)
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
per SSAR
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at April 30, 20196,852
 $33.25
    
Granted522
 54.64
    
Exercised(2,434) 27.77
    
Forfeited or expired(10) 49.70
    
Outstanding at April 30, 20204,930
 $38.19
 5.1 $118
Exercisable at April 30, 20202,932
 $31.86
 3.7 $89



We estimated the fair values usinguse the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of a SSAR. The weighted-average grant-date fair values and related valuation assumptions for the SSARS granted during each of the last three years were as follows:
 2018 2019 2020
Grant-date fair value$6.79
 $11.06
 $11.13
Valuation assumptions:     
Expected term (years)7.00
 7.00
 7.00
Risk-free interest rate2.2% 2.9% 1.9%
Expected volatility15.6% 17.1% 19.3%
Expected dividend yield1.5% 1.4% 1.2%

The expected term is based on past exercise experience for similar awards. The risk-free interest rate is based on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury rates as of the date of grant. Expected volatility and dividend yield are based on historical data, with the following assumptions:consideration of other factors when applicable.
 2016 2017 2018
Risk-free interest rate2.1% 1.4% 2.2%
Expected volatility19.1% 16.3% 15.6%
Expected dividend yield1.6% 1.6% 1.5%
Expected term (years)6.75
 7.00
 7.00
We have also granted restricted stock units (RSUs), deferred stock units (DSUs), and sharesRSUs. RSUs consist predominantly of performance-based restricted stock (PBRS) underRSUs that vest at the Plan (or its predecessor plans). Approximately 670,000 shares underlying these awards, withend of a weighted-average remaining vestingthree-year performance period that begins on the first day of 0.8 years, were nonvested at April 30, 2018. The following table summarizes the changes in the numberfiscal year of shares underlying these awards during 2018.
 
Number of
Underlying Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted
Average
Fair Value at
Grant Date
Nonvested at April 30, 2017601
 $36.50
Granted165
 33.68
Adjusted for dividends or performance43
 50.47
Vested(136) 34.52
Forfeited(3) 39.40
Nonvested at April 30, 2018670
 $39.84
For PBRS awards, performancegrant. Performance is measured based on the relative ranking of the total shareholder return of our Class B common stock during the three-year performance period compared to that of the companies within the Standard & Poor’s Consumer Staples Index at the end of the performance period, with specific payout levels ranging from 50% to 150%. At the end of the performance period, the RSUs are converted to common shares that are subject to an additional one-year holding requirement. The number of shares is determined by adjusting the RSUs by the performance multiplier and adjusting upward to account for dividends paid on our common stock during the second and third years of the performance period.
The totalfollowing table presents information about RSUs outstanding as of April 30, 2020, and for the year then ended.
 
Number of
RSUs
(in thousands)
 
Weighted-
Average
Fair Value at
Grant Date
Outstanding at April 30, 2019382
 $44.91
Granted88
 $56.99
Converted to common shares(179) $38.56
Forfeited(2) $55.27
Outstanding at April 30, 2020289
 $52.44

We calculate the grant-date fair value of RSUs, PBRSa performance based RSU using a Monte Carlo simulation technique. The weighted average grant-date fair values and related valuation assumptions for these awards andgranted during each of the last three years were as follows:
 2018 2019 2020
Grant-date fair value$46.93
 $55.29
 $56.99
Valuation assumptions:     
Risk-free interest rate1.5% 2.7% 1.8%
Expected volatility18.9% 20.8% 21.8%
Expected dividend yield1.4% 1.2% 1.2%
Remaining performance period (years) as of grant date2.8
 2.8
 2.8

DSUs. DSUs vested during 2016, 2017, and 2018 was $10, $8, and $6, respectively.are granted to our non-employee directors. Each DSU represents the right to receive one share of common stock based on the closing price of the shares on the date of grant. Outstanding DSUs are credited with dividend-equivalent DSUs when dividends are paid on our common stock. Each annual grant vests after one year. DSUs are paid out in shares after the completion of a director’s tenure on the board plus a six-month waiting period. The director may elect to receive the distribution either in a single lump sum or in ten equal annual installments. As of April 30, 2020, there were approximately 246,000 outstanding DSUs, of which approximately 215,000 were vested.

The accompanying consolidated statementsgrant-date fair value of operations reflecta DSU is the closing market price of the underlying stock on the grant date. The weighted average grant-date fair values for these awards granted during each of the last three years were as follows:
 2018 2019 2020
Grant-date fair value$41.81
 $54.20
 $53.34

Additional information. The pre-tax stock-based compensation expense related to stock-based incentive awards on a pre-tax basis of $15 in 2016, $14 in 2017, and $19 in 2018, partially offset byrelated deferred income tax benefits of $6 in 2016, $5 in 2017, and $6 in 2018. recognized during the last three fiscal years were as follows:
 2018 2019 2020
Pre-tax compensation expense$19
 $14
 $11
Deferred tax benefit6
 2
 2

As of April 30, 2018,2020, there was $7 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation.awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.31.6 years.

10. COMMON STOCK
On May 26, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split for our Class A and Class B common stock, subject to stockholder approval of an amendment Further information related to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation. The amendment, which was approved by stockholders on July 28, 2016, increasedstock-based awards for the number of authorized shares of Class A common stock from 85,000,000 to 170,000,000. The amendment did not change the number of authorized Class B common shares, which remained at 400,000,000.last three years is as follows:
The stock split, which was effected as a stock dividend, resulted in the issuance of one new share of Class A common stock for each share of Class A common stock outstanding and one new share of Class B common stock for each share of Class B common stock outstanding. The new shares were distributed on August 18, 2016, to shareholders of record as of August 8, 2016.
 2018 2019 2020
Intrinsic value of SSARs exercised$73
 $31
 $89
Fair value of shares vested1
6
 20
 14
Excess tax benefit from exercise / vesting of awards18
 7
 20
      
On May 24, 2017, we retired 67,000,000 shares of Class B common stock previously held as treasury shares. This retirement reduced the number of issued shares of Class B common stock by that same amount.
On January 23, 2018, our Board of Directors approved a stock split, effected in the form of a stock dividend. For every four shares of either Class A or Class B common stock held, shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 7, 2018, received one share of Class B common stock, with any fractional shares payable in cash. The additional shares and cash for fractional shares were distributed to stockholders on February 28, 2018.

The following table shows the effects of the stock splits and treasury stock retirement on the number of issued common shares:
 Issued
(Shares in thousands)Class A Class B Total
Balance at April 30, 201685,000
 142,313
 227,313
Stock split85,000
 142,313
 227,313
Balance at April 30, 2017170,000
 284,626
 454,626
Retirement of treasury stock
 (67,000) (67,000)
Stock split
 96,906
 96,906
Balance at April 30, 2018170,000
 314,532
 484,532
Except1The fair value of shares vested in fiscal 2019 includes $10 related to a one-time performance-based special grant of restricted stock issued in fiscal 2014 to our Chief Executive Officer (who retired in fiscal 2019). During the performance period, dividends accrued and the award was adjusted for all applicable stock splits during the pre-split share balances and activity included investing period, subject to the above table, all share and per share amounts reported in these financial statements and related notes are presentedsame performance measures as the initial grant. The resulting shares vested on a split-adjusted basis.June 1, 2018.
The following table shows the change in outstanding common shares during each of the last three years:
 Outstanding
(Shares in thousands)Class A Class B Total
Balance at April 30, 2015168,926
 352,823
 521,749
Acquisition of treasury stock(114) (28,422) (28,536)
Stock issued under compensation plans248
 892
 1,140
Balance at April 30, 2016169,060
 325,293
 494,353
Acquisition of treasury stock(77) (14,768) (14,845)
Stock issued under compensation plans68
 530
 598
Balance at April 30, 2017169,051
 311,055
 480,106
Acquisition of treasury stock(25) (6) (31)
Stock issued under compensation plans36
 890
 926
Balance at April 30, 2018169,062
 311,939
 481,001


11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share further includes the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation awards. We calculate that dilutive effect using the “treasury stock method” (as defined by GAAP).
The following table presents information concerning basic and diluted earnings per share:
 2016 2017 2018
Net income available to common stockholders$1,067
 $669
 $717
Share data (in thousands):     
Basic average common shares outstanding507,441
 484,635
 480,319
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards3,259
 3,442
 3,929
Diluted average common shares outstanding510,700
 488,077
 484,248
      
Basic earnings per share$2.10
 $1.38
 $1.49
Diluted earnings per share$2.09
 $1.37
 $1.48
We excluded common stock-based awards for approximately 1,131,000 shares, 2,145,000 shares, and 805,000 shares from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively, because they were not dilutive for those periods under the treasury stock method.

12. INCOME TAXESIncome Taxes
We incur income taxes on the earnings of our U.S. and foreign operations. The following table, based on the locations of the taxable entities from which sales were derived (rather than the location of customers), presents the U.S. and foreign components of our income before income taxes:
 2018 2019 2020
United States$747
 $863
 $849
Foreign230
 179
 160
 $977
 $1,042
 $1,009
 2016 2017 2018
United States$1,184
 $806
 $747
Foreign305
 127
 230
 $1,489
 $933
 $977

The income shown above was determined according to GAAP. Because those standards sometimes differ from the tax rules used to calculate taxable income, there are differences between: (a) the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income for a year;year and (b) the tax bases of assets or liabilities and their amounts as recorded in our financial statements. As a result, we recognize a current tax liability for the estimated income tax payable on the current tax return, and deferred tax liabilities (income tax payable on income that will be recognized on future tax returns) and deferred tax assets (income tax refunds from deductions that will be recognized on future tax returns) for the estimated effects of the differences mentioned above.

Total income tax expense for a year includes the tax associated with the current tax return (current tax expense) and the change in the net deferred tax asset or liability (deferred tax expense). Our total income tax expense for each of the last three years was as follows:
 2018 2019 2020
Current:     
U.S. federal$265
 $107
 $95
Foreign47
 34
 29
State and local17
 28
 19
 329
 169
 143
Deferred:     
U.S. federal(48) 37
 34
Foreign(13) 4
 7
State and local(8) (3) (2)
 (69) 38
 39
 $260
 $207
 $182
 2016 2017 2018
Current:     
U.S. federal$347
 $226
 $265
Foreign47
 40
 47
State and local18
 8
 17
 412
 274
 329
Deferred:     
U.S. federal$24
 $(1) $(48)
Foreign(17) (9) (13)
State and local3
 
 (8)
 10
 (10) (69)
 $422
 $264
 $260

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act). The Tax Act significantly revisesrevised the future, ongoing U.S. corporate income tax by, among other things, lowering U.S. corporate income tax rates and implementing a territorial tax system. AsBecause we have an April 30 fiscal year-end, the lower corporate income tax rate was phased in, resulting in a U.S. statutory federal rate of 30.4% for our fiscal year ended April 30, 2018, and 21% for fiscal 2019 and subsequent fiscal years. During fiscal 2018,For the impactyear ended April 30, 2019, the reduction of the lower taxU.S. statutory federal rate from 35% (the pre-Tax Act rate) to 21% resulted in a tax benefit of approximately $19. With the enactment of the Tax Act, we are evaluating our global working capital requirements and may change our current permanent reinvestment assertion in future periods.$115.
There arewere also certain transitional impacts of the Tax Act. As part of the transition to the new territorial tax system, the Tax Act imposesimposed a one-time repatriation tax on deemed repatriation of historical earnings of foreign subsidiaries. In addition, the reduction of the U.S. corporate tax rate required us to adjustwe adjusted our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower federal base rate of 21%. These transitional impacts resulted in a provisional net charge of $43 for the year ended April 30, 2018, comprisedcomposed of a provisional repatriation U.S. tax charge of $91 and a provisional net deferred tax benefit of $48.
The Tax Act also established new tax laws that may impact our financial statements beginning in In the fiscal 2019. These new laws include, but are not limited to (a) Global Intangible Low-Tax Income (GILTI),year ended April 30, 2019, we recorded a new provision for tax on low-tax foreign earnings; (b) Base Erosion Anti-abuse Tax (BEAT), a new minimum tax; (c) repealbenefit of the domestic production activity deduction; and (d) limitations on certain executive compensation.
As noted, certain income earned by foreign subsidiaries must be included in U.S. taxable income under the GILTI provisions. The FASB allows$4 as an accounting policy election of either recognizing deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or recognizing such taxes as a current period expense when incurred. Dueadjustment to the complexity of calculating

GILTI under the Tax Act, we have not determined which method we will apply. Therefore, we have not recognized any adjustments for GILTI tax in our fiscal 2018 financial statements. We expect to elect an accounting policy in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.provisional repatriation tax.
The changes included in the Tax Act are broad and complex. The final transition impacts of the Tax Act may differ from the above estimates, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, any legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, any changes in accounting standards for income taxes or related interpretations in response to the Tax Act, or any updates or changes to estimates we have used to calculate the transition impacts, including impacts from changes to current year earnings estimates and foreign exchange rates of foreign subsidiaries.
Shortly after the Tax Act was enacted, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (SAB 118). Under SAB 118, companies are providedrules that allowed for a measurement period notof up to extend beyond one year sinceafter the enactment date of enactment. To the extent a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects are incomplete, the company may determine a reasonable estimate and record a provisional amount within the first reporting period in which a reasonable estimate can be determined. We expect to complete our analysis of the amounts recorded upon enactment of the Tax Act withinto finalize the measurement periodrecording of the related tax impacts. As of April 30, 2019, the amounts recorded for the Tax Act for the one-time repatriation tax and the adjustment to our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities were finalized and no longer deemed to be provisional.
The Tax Act also established new tax provisions that impact our financial statements beginning in fiscal 2019. These new provisions include (a) Global Intangible Low-Tax Income (GILTI), a new inclusion rule affecting non-routine income earned by foreign subsidiaries; (b) Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT), a new minimum tax; (c) Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII), a new preferential tax rate for domestic income earned from serving foreign markets; (d) repeal of the domestic production activity deduction; and (e) limitations on the deductibility of certain executive compensation. For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2019 and April 30, 2020, the net impact of these provisions was approximately $12 and $11 of additional tax, respectively.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was enacted on March 27, 2020. It included certain provisions for additional net operating loss utilization, immediate refund for AMT Credit Carryforwards, and increased income limitation under IRC section 163(j) for 2019 and 2020. The CARES Act also retroactively clarified the immediate write-off of qualified improvement property beginning in 2018 and increased the charitable contribution deduction.
As of April 30, 2020, we had approximately $1,279 of undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries. Most of these earnings have been previously subject to tax, primarily as a result of the one-time repatriation tax on foreign earnings required by the Tax Act. Historically, we have asserted that the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are reinvested indefinitely outside the United States. During fiscal 2020, we changed our indefinite reinvestment assertion with respect to current year earnings and prior year undistributed earnings for one year.of our foreign subsidiaries (but not for its other outside basis differences) and repatriated $15 of cash to the United States. No incremental taxes were due on this distribution of cash beyond the repatriation tax recorded in fiscal year 2018. However, we incurred withholding tax of $1 related to the distribution. We have not changed the indefinite reinvestment assertion on the undistributed earnings or other outside basis differences of any of our other remaining foreign subsidiaries, and no deferred taxes have been provided. A determination of the unrecognized deferred tax liabilities on the other outside basis differences and earnings reinvested indefinitely at April 30, 2020, is not practicable due to the complexities in

the calculations. The other outside basis differences are primarily related to differences between U.S. GAAP and tax basis that arose through purchase accounting. These basis differences could reverse through sales of foreign subsidiaries or other transactions, none of which are considered probable as of April 30, 2020.
As of April 30, 2019, we had approximately $1,266 of undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries. During fiscal 2019, we changed our indefinite reinvestment assertion with respect to current year earnings and prior year undistributed earnings for one of our foreign subsidiaries (but not for its other outside basis differences) and repatriated $120 of cash to the United States.
Our consolidated effective tax rate usually differs from current statutory rates due to the recognition of amounts for events or transactions with no tax consequences. The following table reconciles our effective tax rate to the federal statutory tax rate in the United States:
 Percent of Income Before Taxes
 2018 2019 2020
U.S. federal statutory rate30.4% 21.0% 21.0%
State taxes, net of U.S. federal tax benefit0.8% 2.1% 1.7%
Income taxed at other than U.S. federal statutory rate(3.4%) (0.1%) %
Tax benefit from foreign-derived sales% (1.7%) (2.0%)
Adjustments related to prior years(0.9%) (1.2%) (1.1%)
Tax benefit from U.S. manufacturing(2.5%) % %
Amortization of deferred tax benefit from intercompany transactions(1.6%) % %
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards(1.8%) (0.7%) (2.0%)
Impact of Tax Act2.5% (0.4%) %
Other, net3.1% 0.8% 0.4%
Effective rate26.6% 19.8% 18.0%
 Percent of Income Before Taxes
 2016 2017 2018
U.S. federal statutory rate35.0% 35.0% 30.4%
State taxes, net of U.S. federal tax benefit1.0% 0.9% 0.8%
Income taxed at other than U.S. federal statutory rate(2.5%) (1.7%) (3.4%)
Tax benefit from U.S. manufacturing(2.4%) (2.4%) (2.5%)
Tax impact of sale of business(1.1%) % %
Amortization of deferred tax benefit from intercompany transactions(1.6%) (1.7%) (1.6%)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards% (1.0%) (1.8%)
Provisional impact of Tax Act% % 2.5%
Other, net(0.1%) (0.8%) 2.2%
Effective rate28.3% 28.3% 26.6%

Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the end of each of the last two years were as follows:
April 30,2019 2020
Deferred tax assets:   
Postretirement and other benefits$87
 $110
Accrued liabilities and other23
 23
Inventories34
 26
Lease liabilities
 14
Loss and credit carryforwards55
 57
Valuation allowance(25) (22)
Total deferred tax assets, net174
 208
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Intangible assets(218) (233)
Property, plant, and equipment(73) (90)
Right-of-use assets
 (13)
Derivative instruments(9) (18)
Other(3) (16)
Total deferred tax liabilities(303) (370)
Net deferred tax liability$(129) $(162)

April 30,2017 2018
Deferred tax assets:   
Postretirement and other benefits$173
 $89
Accrued liabilities and other17
 36
Inventories27
 48
Loss carryforwards44
 51
Valuation allowance(30) (29)
Total deferred tax assets, net231
 195
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Intangible assets(262) (199)
Property, plant, and equipment(90) (64)
Other(15) (1)
Total deferred tax liabilities(367) (264)
Net deferred tax liability$(136) $(69)





Details of the loss and credit carryforwards and related valuation allowances as of the end of each of the last two years are as follows:
 April 30, 2017 April 30, 2018  April 30, 2019 April 30, 2020 
 Gross Amount Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance Gross Amount Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance Expiration (as of April 30, 2018) Gross Amount Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance Gross Amount Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance Expiration (as of April 30, 2020)
Finland net operating losses $65
 $13
 $
 $94
 $19
 $
 2024-2028 $105
 $21
 $
 $119 $24 $
 2024-2030
Brazil net operating losses 49
 17
 (17) 48
 16
 (16) None 42
 14
 (14) 31
 10
 (10) None
United Kingdom non-trading losses 27
 5
 (5) 29
 6
 (6) None 27
 5
 (5) 26
 5
 (5) None
Various state net operating losses 
 
 
 34
 2
 
 2033-2038
Various state net operating losses and credits 68
 6
 
 63
 9
 
 
Various1
Other 43
 9
 (8) 41
 8
 (7) 
Various1
 54
 9
 (6) 50
 9
 (7) 
Various2
 $184
 $44
 $(30) $246
 $51
 $(29)  $296
 $55
 $(25) $289
 $57
 $(22) 
1As of April 30, 2018,2020, the net deferred tax asset amount includes credit carryforwards of $3 that do not expire and loss and credit carryforwards of $6 that expire in varying amounts from 2023 to 2040.
2As of April 30, 2020, the gross amount includes loss carryforwards of $11$24 that do not expire and $30$26 that expire in varying amounts over the next 1020 years.
Although the losses in Brazil can be carried forward indefinitely, it is uncertain whether we will realize sufficient taxable income to allow us to use these losses. The non-trading losses in the United Kingdom can also be carried forward indefinitely. However, we know of no significant transactions that will let us use them.
During 2014, we deferred a tax benefit of $95 that resulted primarily from the release of certain deferred tax liabilities in connection with an intercompany transfer of assets, composed primarily of an intangible asset. We have been amortizing the deferred benefit to tax expense over approximately six years for financial reporting purposes, in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 740-10-25-3(e) (Income Taxes) and ASC 810-45-8 (Consolidation), resulting in a tax benefit of $5 in 2014, $15 in 2015, $16 in 2016, $16 in 2017, and $16 in 2018. The remaining balance of the deferred benefit, which is included in “other liabilities” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, was $27 as of April 30, 2018. As discussed in Note 1, revised accounting guidance (ASU 2016-16) will require the recognition of income tax consequences of intercompany transfers of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Our adoption of this revised guidance will result in this balance being recognized as an increase in retained earnings rather than as a reduction in income tax expense.
As of April 30, 2018, we had approximately $1,270 of undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries ($1,053 at April 30, 2017). Historically, deferred tax liabilities have not been recognized on these earnings. However, upon enactment of the Tax Act, the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are subject to U.S. tax due to the Tax Act’s provision imposing a mandatory deemed repatriation tax on accumulated foreign earnings provision. As a result, we have provisionally recognized a one-time income tax expense of $91. Deferred tax liabilities were not provided for any additional outside basis differences inherent in our foreign subsidiaries (i.e. basis differences in excess of those subject to the mandatory deemed repatriation tax) as these amounts continue to be provisionally reinvested indefinitely outside the United States. If these amounts were not considered permanently reinvested, deferred tax liabilities would have been provided for additional income taxes (if any) and withholding taxes payable in various countries. A determination of the unrecognized deferred tax liabilities on the earnings reinvested indefinitely at April 30, 2018 is not practicable.
At April 30, 2018,2020, we had $11 of gross unrecognized tax benefits, $9 of which would reduce our effective income tax rate if recognized. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits follows:
 2018 2019 2020
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year$9
 $11
 $11
Additions for tax positions provided in prior periods5
 1
 2
Additions for tax positions provided in current period1
 1
 
Decreases for tax positions provided in prior years(4) (2) (1)
Settlements of tax positions in the current period
 
 (1)
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year$11
 $11
 $11
 2016 2017 2018
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year$13
 $9
 $9
Additions for tax positions provided in prior periods1
 2
 5
Additions for tax positions provided in current period
 
 1
Decreases for tax positions provided in prior years(4) (2) (4)
Settlements of tax positions in the current period(1) 
 
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year$9
 $9
 $11

We file income tax returns in the United States, including several state and local jurisdictions, as well as in several other countries in which we conduct business. The major jurisdictions and their earliest fiscal years that are currently open for tax examinations are 20112014 for one state in the United States; 20162018 in the United Kingdom; 2016 in Australia; 2015 in Finland, Germany, and Poland; 2014 in Australiathe Netherlands and Finland;Brazil; and 2013 in Brazil, Germany, Mexico andMexico. We expect the Netherlands; and 2012 in Poland. The auditaudits of our fiscal 20162018 and fiscal 2019 U.S. federal tax return was concluded in the second quarter of fiscal 2018; we expect the audit of the fiscal 2017 U.S. federal tax returnreturns to be concluded in the first half of fiscal 2019.2021. In addition, we are participating in the Internal Revenue Service’s Compliance Assurance Program for our fiscal 20182020 tax year.
We believe there will be no0 material change in our gross unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months.

12. Acquisition of Business
On July 3, 2019, we acquired 100% of the voting interests in The 86 Company, which owns Fords Gin, for $22 in cash. The purchase price was allocated largely to the intangible assets that were acquired, including goodwill of $11 and other indefinite-lived intangibles of $12, net of deferred tax liabilities of $1. The goodwill is primarily attributable to the value of leveraging our distribution network and brand-building expertise to grow global sales of the Fords Gin brand and to the knowledge and expertise of the organized workforce employed by the acquired business. We do not expect the goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes. The 86 Company has been included in our consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date. Actual and pro forma results are not presented due to immateriality.
13. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOMEDerivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
Our multinational business exposes us to global market risks, including the effect of fluctuations in currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates. We use derivatives to help manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. We formally document the purpose of each derivative contract, which includes linking the contract to the financial exposure it is designed to mitigate. We do not hold or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

We use currency derivative contracts to limit our exposure to the currency exchange risk that we cannot mitigate internally by using netting strategies. We designate most of these contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions (expected to occur within three years). We record all changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) until the underlying hedged transaction occurs, at which time we reclassify that amount into earnings.
We do not designate some of our currency derivatives as hedges because we use them to partially offset the immediate earnings impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on existing assets or liabilities. We immediately recognize the change in fair value of these contracts in earnings.
We had outstanding currency derivatives, related primarily to our euro, British pound, and Australian dollar exposures, with notional amounts for all hedged currencies totaling $1,241 and $1,026 at April 30, 2019 and 2020, respectively. The maximum term of outstanding derivative contracts was 36 months at both April 30, 2019 and 2020.
We also use foreign currency-denominated debt to help manage our foreign currency exchange risk. The amount of foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedges was $635 and $613 as of April 30, 2019 and 2020, respectively. These net investment hedges are intended to mitigate foreign currency exchange exposure related to non-U.S. dollar net investments in certain foreign subsidiaries. Any change in value of the designated portion of the hedging instruments is recorded in AOCI, offsetting the foreign currency translation adjustment of the related net investments that is also recorded in AOCI.
At inception, we expect each financial instrument designated as a hedge to be highly effective in offsetting the financial exposure it is designed to mitigate. We also assess the effectiveness on an ongoing basis. If determined to no longer be highly effective, designation and accounting for the instrument as a hedge would be discontinued.
We use forward purchase contracts with suppliers to protect against corn price volatility. We expect to physically take delivery of the corn underlying each contract and use it for production over a reasonable period of time. Accordingly, we account for these contracts as normal purchases rather than as derivative instruments.
The following table presents the pre-tax impact that changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments and non-derivative hedging instruments had on AOCI and earnings during each of the last three years:
 Classification in Statement of Operations 2018 2019 2020
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:       
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCIn/a $(54) $69
 $61
Net gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earningsSales (11) 6
 23
Currency derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:       
Net gain (loss) recognized in earningsSales (5) 6
 4
Net gain (loss) recognized in earningsOther income (expense), net 9
 6
 (14)
Foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedge:       
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCIn/a (41) 45
 22
        
Total amounts presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for line items affected by the net gains (losses) shown above:      
Sales  4,201
 4,276
 4,306
Other income (expense), net  16
 15
 (11)
We expect to reclassify $47 of deferred net gains on cash flow hedges recorded in AOCI as of April 30, 2020, to earnings during fiscal 2021. This reclassification would offset the anticipated earnings impact of the underlying hedged exposures. The actual amounts that we ultimately reclassify to earnings will depend on the exchange rates in effect when the underlying hedged transactions occur.

The following table presents the fair values of our derivative instruments as of April 30, 2019 and 2020:
 Balance Sheet Classification Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
April 30, 2019     
Designated as cash flow hedges:     
Currency derivativesOther current assets $21
 $(2)
Currency derivativesOther assets 22
 (1)
Currency derivativesAccrued expenses 
 (5)
Currency derivativesOther liabilities 
 (1)
Not designated as hedges:     
Currency derivativesAccrued expenses 
 
April 30, 2020     
Designated as cash flow hedges:     
Currency derivativesOther current assets 49
 (1)
Currency derivativesOther assets 30
 
Currency derivativesAccrued expenses 
 
Currency derivativesOther liabilities 
 
Not designated as hedges:     
Currency derivativesAccrued expenses 
 (2)

The fair values reflected in the above table are presented on a gross basis. However, as discussed further below, the fair values of those instruments subject to net settlement agreements are presented on a net basis in our balance sheets.
In our statements of cash flows, we classify cash flows related to cash flow hedges in the same category as the cash flows from the hedged items.
Credit risk. We are exposed to credit-related losses if the counterparties to our derivative contracts default. This credit risk is limited to the fair value of the contracts. To manage this risk, we contract only with major financial institutions that have earned investment-grade credit ratings and with whom we have standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements that allow for net settlement of the derivative contracts. Also, we have established counterparty credit guidelines that we monitor regularly, and we monetize contracts when we believe it is warranted. Because of these safeguards, we believe we have no derivative positions that warrant credit valuation adjustments.
Some of our derivative instruments require us to maintain a specific level of creditworthiness, which we have maintained. If our creditworthiness were to fall below that level, then the counterparties to our derivative instruments could request immediate payment or collateralization for derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with creditworthiness requirements that were in a net liability position was $6 and $2 at April 30, 2019 and 2020, respectively.
Offsetting. As noted above, our derivative contracts are governed by ISDA agreements that allow for net settlement of derivative contracts with the same counterparty. It is our policy to present the fair values of current derivatives (that is, those with a remaining term of 12 months or less) with the same counterparty on a net basis in our balance sheets. Similarly, we present the fair values of noncurrent derivatives with the same counterparty on a net basis. We do not net current derivatives with noncurrent derivatives in our balance sheets.

The following table summarizes the changegross and net amounts of our derivative contracts:
 
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)
 
Gross Amounts Offset in
Balance Sheet
 
Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet
 
Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet
 Net Amounts
April 30, 2019         
Derivative assets$43
 $(3) $40
 $
 $40
Derivative liabilities(9) 3
 (6) 
 (6)
April 30, 2020         
Derivative assets79
 (1) 78
 
 78
Derivative liabilities(3) 1
 (2) 
 (2)

No cash collateral was received or pledged related to our derivative contracts as of April 30, 2019 or 2020.
14. Fair Value Measurements
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis:
 2019 2020
April 30,
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Assets:       
Cash and cash equivalents$307
 $307
 $675
 $675
Currency derivatives40
 40
 78
 78
Liabilities:       
Currency derivatives6
 6
 2
 2
Short-term borrowings150
 150
 333
 333
Long-term debt2,290
 2,399
 2,269
 2,486

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in each componentthe principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We categorize the fair values of AOCI, netassets and liabilities into three levels based on the assumptions (inputs) used to determine those values. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of tax,fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are:
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity.
We determine the fair values of our currency derivatives (forward contracts) using standard valuation models. The significant inputs used in these models, which are readily available in public markets or can be derived from observable market transactions, include the applicable spot exchange rates, forward exchange rates, and interest rates. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
We determine the fair value of long-term debt primarily based on the prices at which identical or similar debt has recently traded in the market and also considering the overall market conditions on the date of valuation. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
The fair values of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term borrowings approximate the carrying amounts due to the short maturities of these instruments.
We measure some assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. That is, we do not measure them at fair value on an ongoing basis, but we do adjust them to fair value in some circumstances (for example, when we determine that an asset is impaired). As discussed in Note 4, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge during 2018:the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 related to our Chambord brand name. The impairment charge was based on the estimated fair value of the brand name, which we determined using the relief from royalty method, and which is categorized as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. No other material nonrecurring fair value measurements were required during the periods presented in these financial statements.
15. Leases

We enter into lease arrangements, which we use primarily for office space, vehicles, and land. Substantially all of our leases are operating leases. Our finance leases are not material.
Effective May 1, 2019, we updated our accounting policy for leases to reflect the adoption of ASC 842. Under ASC 842, we record lease liabilities and right-of-use (ROU) assets on our balance sheet for leases with terms exceeding 12 months. We do not record lease liabilities or ROU assets for short-term leases.
The amounts recorded for lease liabilities and ROU assets are based on the estimated present value, as of the lease commencement date, of the future payments to be made over the lease term. We calculate the present value using our incremental borrowing rate that corresponds to the term of the lease. We include the effect of an option to renew or terminate a lease in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise the option.
Some of our leases contain non-lease components (e.g., maintenance or other services) in addition to lease components. We have elected the practical expedient not to separate the non-lease components from the lease components.
The following table shows the amounts and classification of ROU assets and lease liabilities on our balance sheet as of April 30, 2020:
 ClassificationApril 30,
2020
Right-of-use assetsOther assets$51
   
Lease liabilities:  
CurrentAccounts payable and accrued expenses$16
Non-currentOther liabilities37
Total $53

The following table shows information about the effects of leases during 2020:
 Currency Translation Adjustments Cash Flow Hedge Adjustments Postretirement Benefits Adjustments Total AOCI
Balance at April 30, 2017$(204) $11
 $(197) $(390)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)24
 (28) 16
 12
Balance at April 30, 2018$(180) $(17) $(181) $(378)
 2020
Total lease cost1
$29
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities2
21
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities35

1Consists primarily of operating lease cost. Other components of lease cost were not material.

2Classified within operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows.
The following table includes a maturity analysis of future (undiscounted) operating lease payments and a reconciliation of those payments to the lease liabilities recorded on our balance sheet as of April 30, 2020:
 April 30,
2020
2021$17
202213
20239
20246
20253
Thereafter9
Total lease payments57
Less: Present value discount(4)
Lease liabilities$53
  
Weighted-average discount rate3.0%
Weighted-average remaining term5.2 years


Future operating lease payments, under the prior accounting standard (ASC 840), were as follows as of April 30, 2019:
 April 30,
2019
2020$23
202116
202210
20235
20243
Thereafter2
Total lease payments$59

Rent expense for operating leases (under ASC 840) was $26 in 2018 and $28 in 2019.

16. Other Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the components of net other comprehensive income (loss) during each of the last three years:
Pre-Tax Tax Net
Year Ended April 30, 2016     
Currency translation adjustments:     
Net gain (loss) on currency translation$(22) $(1) $(23)
Reclassification to earnings
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net(22) (1) (23)
Cash flow hedge adjustments:     
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments30
 (10) 20
Reclassification to earnings1
(60) 23
 (37)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net(30) 13
 (17)
Postretirement benefits adjustments:     
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost(47) 19
 (28)
Reclassification to earnings2
30
 (12) 18
Other comprehensive income (loss), net(17) 7
 (10)
     
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net$(69) $19
 $(50)
     
Year Ended April 30, 2017     
Currency translation adjustments:     
Net gain (loss) on currency translation$(71) $(4) $(75)
Reclassification to earnings3
 (1) 2
Other comprehensive income (loss), net(68) (5) (73)
Cash flow hedge adjustments:     
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments41
 (17) 24
Reclassification to earnings1
(40) 16
 (24)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net1
 (1) 
Postretirement benefits adjustments:     
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost28
 (10) 18
Reclassification to earnings2
25
 (10) 15
Other comprehensive income (loss), net53
 (20) 33
     
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net$(14) $(26) $(40)
     Pre-Tax Tax Net
Year Ended April 30, 2018          
Currency translation adjustments:          
Net gain (loss) on currency translation$12
 $12
 $24
$12
 $12
 $24
Reclassification to earnings
 
 

 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net12
 12
 24
12
 12
 24
Cash flow hedge adjustments:          
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments(54) 18
 (36)(54) 18
 (36)
Reclassification to earnings1
11
 (3) 8
11
 (3) 8
Other comprehensive income (loss), net(43) 15
 (28)(43) 15
 (28)
Postretirement benefits adjustments:          
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost5
 (2) 3
5
 (2) 3
Reclassification to earnings2
20
 (7) 13
20
 (7) 13
Other comprehensive income (loss), net25
 (9) 16
25
 (9) 16
          
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net$(6) $18
 $12
$(6) $18
 $12
     
Year Ended April 30, 2019     
Currency translation adjustments:     
Net gain (loss) on currency translation$(16) $(11) $(27)
Reclassification to earnings
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net(16) (11) (27)
Cash flow hedge adjustments:     
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments69
 (16) 53
Reclassification to earnings1
(6) 1
 (5)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net63
 (15) 48
Postretirement benefits adjustments:     
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost(41) 10
 (31)
Reclassification to earnings2
33
 (8) 25
Other comprehensive income (loss), net(8) 2
 (6)
     
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net$39
 $(24) $15
     
Year Ended April 30, 2020     
Currency translation adjustments:     
Net gain (loss) on currency translation$(88) $(6) $(94)
Reclassification to earnings
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net(88) (6) (94)
Cash flow hedge adjustments:     
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments61
 (14) 47
Reclassification to earnings1
(23) 6
 (17)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net38
 (8) 30
Postretirement benefits adjustments:     
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost(119) 28
 (91)
Reclassification to earnings2
18
 (4) 14
Other comprehensive income (loss), net(101) 24
 (77)
     
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net$(151) $10
 $(141)
1Pre-tax amount is classified as sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
2Pre-tax amount is a componentclassified as non-operating postretirement expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of pension and other postretirement benefit expense (as shown in Note 8, except for amounts related to non-U.S. benefit plans, about which no information is presented in Note 8 due to immateriality).operations.



14. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
The following table presents net sales by product category:17. Supplemental Information
 2016 2017 2018
Net sales:     
Spirits$2,901
 $2,805
 $3,060
Wine188
 189
 188
 $3,089
 $2,994
 $3,248
The following table presents net sales by geography:
 2018 2019 2020
Net sales:     
United States$1,529
 $1,563
 $1,690
United Kingdom206
 199
 180
Germany146
 159
 171
Australia163
 164
 155
Mexico162
 166
 155
Other1,042
 1,073
 1,012
 $3,248
 $3,324
 $3,363

 2016 2017 2018
Net sales:     
United States$1,491
 $1,444
 $1,539
Europe834
 770
 864
Australia153
 151
 163
Other611
 629
 682
 $3,089
 $2,994
 $3,248


Net sales are attributed to countries based on where customers are located. See Note 8 for additional information about net sales, including net sales by product category.
Our two largest customers accounted for approximately 18% and 13% of consolidated net sales in 2020.
The net book value of property, plant, and equipment located outside the United States was $96$107 and $111$105 as of April 30, 20172019 and 2018,2020, respectively. Other long-lived assets located outside the United States are not significant.
We have concluded that our business constitutes a single operating segment.
15. GAIN ON SALE OF BUSINESS18. Subsequent Event
On March 1, 2016,June 12, 2020, we sold our Southern Comfortentered into an agreement to sell assets related to the Early Times, Canadian Mist, and TuacaCollingwood brands (including intellectual property, inventories, and the Canadian Mist production assets) to Sazerac Company, Inc. for $543 in cash.Company. The sale reflects the continued evolution of our portfolio strategy to focus on premium brands. We expect to recognize a gain on the sale at closing, which is currently expected to occur by October 31, 2020. The total book valuecarrying amount of the related business assets to be included in the sale was $49, and consistedis approximately 1% of $11 in inventories, $16 in goodwill, and $22 in other intangibleour consolidated total assets. As a result of the sale, we recognized a gain of $485 (net of transaction costs of $9) during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.


16. ACQUISITION OF BUSINESS
On June 1, 2016, we acquired The BenRiach Distillery Company Limited (BenRiach) for aggregate consideration of $407, consisting of a purchase price of $341 and $66 in assumed debt and transaction-related obligations that we have since paid. The acquisition, which brought three single malt Scotch whisky brands into our portfolio, included brand trademarks, inventories, three malt distilleries, a bottling plant, and BenRiach’s headquarters in Edinburgh, Scotland.
The purchase price of $341 included cash of $307 paid at the acquisition date for 90% of the voting interests in BenRiach and a liability of $34 related to a put and call option agreement for the remaining 10% equity shares. Under that agreement, we could choose (or be required) to purchase the remaining 10% for £24 ($34 at the exchange rate on June 1, 2016) during the one-year period ending November 14, 2017.
The purchase price of $341 was allocated based on management’s estimates and independent appraisals as follows:
 June 1,
2016
Accounts receivable$11
Inventories158
Other current assets1
Property, plant, and equipment19
Goodwill183
Trademarks and brand names65
Total assets437
  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses12
Short-term borrowings59
Deferred tax liabilities25
Total liabilities96
  
Net assets acquired$341
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. The goodwill resulting from this acquisition is primarily attributable to: (a) the value of leveraging our distribution network and brand-building expertise to grow global sales of the existing single malt Scotch whisky brands acquired, (b) the valuable opportunity to develop new products and line extensions in the especially attractive premium Scotch whisky category, and (c) the accumulated knowledge and expertise of the organized workforce employed by the acquired business. None of the goodwill amount of $183 is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
On November 17, 2016, we purchased the remaining 10% interest in BenRiach for cash of £24 ($30 at the exchange rate on that date) by exercising the call option described above. That cash payment is classified as a financing activity in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows.
BenRiach’s results of operations have been included in our financial statements since the acquisition date. Actual and pro forma results are not presented due to immateriality.

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
(Expressed in millions, except per share amounts)
 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2019 Fiscal 2020
 First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 Year 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Year First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 Year 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Year
Net sales $661
 $830
 $808
 $694
 $2,994
 $723
 $914
 $878
 $733
 $3,248
 $766
 $910
 $904
 $744
 $3,324
 $766
 $989
 $899
 $709
 $3,363
Gross profit 453
 552
 536
 480
 2,021
 493
 610
 587
 512
 2,202
 523
 590
 571
 482
 2,166
 498
 619
 557
 453
 2,127
Net income 144
 197
 182
 144
 669
 178
 239
 190
 110
 717
 200
 249
 227
 159
 835
 186
 282
 231
 128
 827
Basic EPS 0.29
 0.41
 0.38
 0.30
 1.38
 0.37
 0.50
 0.39
 0.23
 1.49
 0.42
 0.52
 0.47
 0.33
 1.74
 0.39
 0.59
 0.48
 0.27
 1.73
Diluted EPS 0.29
 0.40
 0.38
 0.30
 1.37
 0.37
 0.49
 0.39
 0.23
 1.48
 0.41
 0.52
 0.47
 0.33
 1.73
 0.39
 0.59
 0.48
 0.27
 1.72
Cash dividends per share:Cash dividends per share:                  Cash dividends per share:                  
Declared 0.272
 
 0.292
 
 0.564
 0.292
 
 1.316
 
 1.608
 0.3160
 
 0.3320
 
 0.6480
 0.3320
 
 0.3486
 
 0.6806
Paid 0.136
 0.136
 0.146
 0.146
 0.564
 0.146
 0.146
 0.158
 1.158
 1.608
 0.1580
 0.1580
 0.1660
 0.1660
 0.6480
 0.1660
 0.1660
 0.1743
 0.1743
 0.6806
Market price per share:                  
Class A high 43.42
 43.56
 39.46
 40.04
 43.56
 42.75
 42.62
 51.30
 55.67
 55.67
Class A low 40.62
 37.60
 36.50
 37.09
 36.50
 35.50
 37.79
 41.14
 46.61
 35.50
Class B high 40.32
 40.85
 37.63
 39.16
 40.85
 45.54
 45.62
 55.66
 56.52
 56.52
Class B low 37.56
 35.73
 35.17
 36.01
 35.17
 37.82
 38.43
 44.08
 50.66
 37.82
 
Notes:Note: Quarterly amounts may not add to amounts for the year due to rounding. Further, quarterly earnings per share (EPS) amounts may not add to amounts for the year because quarterly and annual EPS calculations are performed separately.
1.Quarterly amounts may not add to amounts for the year due to rounding. Further, quarterly earnings per share (EPS) amounts may not add to amounts for the year because quarterly and annual EPS calculations are performed separately.
2.Per share amounts have been adjusted for a 5-for-4 stock split that occurred in February 2018.
3.Cash dividends for fiscal 2018 include a special dividend of $1.00 per share.




Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) (our principal executive and principal financial officers), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of fiscal 2018.2020. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures: (a) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the companyCompany in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (b) include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the companyCompany in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the company’sCompany’s management, including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended April 30, 2018,2020, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Management’s report on our internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2018,2020, and our independent registered public accounting firm’s report on our internal control over financial reporting are set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
Information on our Executive Officers is included under the caption “Employees and Executive Officers” in Part I of this report. For the other information required by this item, see the following sections of our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held July 26, 2018,30, 2020, which information is incorporated into this report by reference: (a) “Election“Proposal 1: Election of Directors” (for biographical information on directors and family relationships); (b) “Code of Conduct”Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers” (for information on our Codecode of Ethics)ethics); (c) “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” (for information on compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act); (d) “Selection of Directors” (for information on the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors); and (e)(d) “Corporate Governance” (for information on our Audit Committee).
Item 11. Executive Compensation
For the information required by this item, refer to the following sections of our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held July 26, 2018,30, 2020, which information is incorporated into this report by reference: (a) “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”; (b) “Compensation Tables”; (c) “Director Compensation”; (d) “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”; (e) “Compensation Committee Report”; and (f) “Pay Ratio Disclosure.”
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
For equity compensation plan information, refer to “Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.” For the other information required by this item, refer to the section entitled “Stock Ownership” of our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held July 26, 2018,30, 2020, which information is incorporated into this report by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
For the information required by this item, refer to the following sections of our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held July 26, 2018,30, 2020, which information is incorporated into this report by reference: (a) “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”; and (b) “Our Independent Directors.”


Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
For the information required by this item, refer to the following sections of our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held July 26, 2018,30, 2020, which information is incorporated into this report by reference: (a) “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”; and (b) “Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.”
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
We have omitted all other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission either because they are not required under the related instructions, because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, or because they do not apply.
(a)(3) Exhibits:
The following documents are filed with this report:
Exhibit Index
124.1
4.2
4.3
21
23
31.1
31.2
32
101The following materials from Brown-Forman Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2018, formatted2020, in Inline XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): format: (a) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (b) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (c) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (d) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (e) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, and (f) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File in Inline XBRL format (included in Exhibit 101).

The following documents have been previously filed:

Exhibit Index
3.2
3.3
4.14.4
4.24.5
4.34.6
4.44.7
4.5
4.64.8
4.74.9
4.84.10
4.94.11
4.104.12
4.114.13
4.124.14
4.134.15
4.144.16
4.154.17
10.1
10.2


Exhibit Index
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.1610.13
10.1710.14
10.1810.15
10.1910.16
10.2010.17
10.21
10.2210.18
10.2310.19

  
*Indicates management contract, compensatory plan, or arrangement.


Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
  
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
(Registrant)
 
  /s/ Paul C. VargaLawson E. Whiting
 By:Paul C. Varga Lawson E. Whiting
  
President and Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Company
Date: June 13, 201819, 2020
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on June 13, 2018,19, 2020, as indicated:
 
/s/ Geo. Garvin Brown IV 
By:Geo. Garvin Brown IV 
 Director, Chairman of the Board 
 
/s/ Paul C. VargaLawson E. Whiting 
By: Paul C. VargaLawson E. Whiting 
 
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Company
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 

/s/ Patrick Bousquet-Chavanne 
By: Patrick Bousquet-Chavanne 
  Director 


/s/ Campbell P. Brown 
By:Campbell P. Brown 
 Director 
 
/s/ Stuart R. Brown 
By:Stuart R. Brown 
 Director 

 
/s/ Bruce L. Byrnes 
By:Bruce L. Byrnes 
 Director 
 
/s/ John D. Cook 
By:John D. Cook 
 Director 


/s/ Marshall B. Farrer 
By:Marshall B. Farrer 
 Director 


/s/ Laura L. Frazier 
By:Laura L. Frazier 
 Director 


/s/ Kathleen M. Gutmann 
By:Kathleen M. Gutmann 
 Director 



/s/ Augusta Brown Holland 
By:Augusta Brown Holland 
 Director 


/s/ Michael J. Roney 
By:Michael J. Roney 
 Director 
 
/s/ Tracy L. Skeans 
By:Tracy L. Skeans 
 Director 



/s/ Michael A. Todman 
By:Michael A. Todman 
 Director 


/s/ Jane C. Morreau 
By:Jane C. Morreau 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
/s/ Brian P. FitzgeraldKelli N. Brown 
By:Brian P. FitzgeraldKelli N. Brown 
 
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULEBrown-Forman Corporation and Subsidiaries
Schedule II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTSValuation and Qualifying Accounts
For the Years Ended April 30, 20162018, 20172019, and 20182020
(Expressed in millions)
 
Col. ACol. B Col. C(1) Col. C(2) Col. D Col. ECol. B Col. C(1) Col. C(2) Col. D Col. E
Description
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Additions
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 
Additions
Charged to
Other
Accounts
 Deductions 
Balance
at End
of Period
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Additions
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 
Additions
Charged to
Other
Accounts
 Deductions 
Balance
at End
of Period
2016         
Allowance for doubtful accounts$10
 $1
 $
 $2
(1) 
$9
Deferred tax valuation allowance$27
 $3
 $
 $5
 $25
2017         
Allowance for doubtful accounts$9
 $
 $
 $2
(1) 
$7
Deferred tax valuation allowance$25
 $5
 $2
 $2
 $30
2018                  
Allowance for doubtful accounts$7
 $
 $
 $
 $7
$7
 $
 $
 $
 $7
Deferred tax valuation allowance$30
 $3
 $1
 $5
 $29
$30
 $3
 $1
 $5
 $29
2019         
Allowance for doubtful accounts$7
 $1
 $
 $1
(1) 
$7
Deferred tax valuation allowance$29
 $1
 $1
 $6
 $25
2020         
Allowance for doubtful accounts$7
 $4
 $
 $
 $11
Deferred tax valuation allowance$25
 $2
 $
 $5
 $22
  

(1) 
Doubtful accounts written off, net of recoveries.


8984