0000023217 us-gaap:NondesignatedMember us-gaap:ForeignExchangeContractMember us-gaap:PrepaidExpensesAndOtherCurrentAssetsMember 2019-05-26


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 27, 2018

31, 2020

or

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                   to

Commission File No. 1-7275

CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

47-0248710

Delaware47-0248710

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1300

Chicago, Illinois

60654

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (312) 549-5000

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $5.00 par value

CAG

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

Large accelerated filer  þ Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer    ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company   ¨ Emerging growth company    ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨     No  þ

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock of Conagra Brands, Inc. held by non-affiliates on November 26, 201722, 2019 (the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $14,207,433,670$13,986,160,847 based upon the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange on such date.

At June 24, 2018, 390,888,17228, 2020, 487,243,684 common shares were outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant's 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "2018"2020 Proxy Statement") are incorporated by reference into Part III.




Table of Contents

PART I

3

Item 1

3

Item 1

Item 1A

7

Item 1B

17

Item 2

Item 32

Item 3

Legal Proceedings

18

Item 4

20

21

Item 5

21

Item 6

21

Item 7

22

Item 7A

45

Item 8

46

Consolidated Statements of OperationsEarnings for the Fiscal Years Ended May 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018

46

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Fiscal Years Ended May 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018

47

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 201726, 2019

48

Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended May 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018

49

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended May 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018

50

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

51

Item 9

Item 9A

Item 9B

Item 9B

Other Information

102

PART III

103

Item 10

103

Item 11

Item 11

Executive Compensation

103

Item 12

Item 13

104

Item 14

104

105

Item 15

105

Item 16

Signatures

111




PART I


This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors. For a discussion of important factors that could cause our results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements, please refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors and Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General Development of Business

Conagra Brands, Inc. (the "Company", a Delaware corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company""Conagra Brands", "we", "our""us", or "us""our"), headquartered in Chicago, is one of North America's leading branded food companies. Guided by an entrepreneurial spirit, the Company combines a rich heritage of making great food with a sharpened focus on innovation. The Company's portfolio is evolving to satisfy people's changing food preferences. Its iconic brands such as Birds Eye®, Marie Callender's®, Reddi-wipBanquet®, Hunt'sHealthy Choice®, Healthy ChoiceSlim Jim®Slim JimReddi-wip®, and Orville Redenbacher'sVlasic®, as well as emerging brands, including AlexiaAngie's®, Angie's BOOMCHICKAPOP® BOOMCHICKAPOP, Duke's®, Blake'sEarth Balance®, Duke'sGardein®, and Frontera®, offer choices for every occasion.

We began as a Midwestern flour-milling company and entered other commodity-based businesses throughout our history. We were initially incorporated as a Nebraska corporation in 1919 and reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in January 1976. Over time, we transformed into the branded, pure-play consumer packaged goods food company we are today. We achieved this through various acquisitions, including consumer food brands such as Banquet®, Chef Boyardee®, Marie Callender’s®, Alexia®, Blake's®, Frontera®, Duke’s®, BIGS®, and divestitures. We have divested our Lamb Weston business, Private Brands business, Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business, JM Swank business, milling business, dehydrated and fresh vegetable operations, and a trading and merchandising business, among others. Growing our food businesses has also been fueled by innovation, organic growth of our brands, and expansion into adjacent categories.categories, including through acquisitions. We are focused on delivering sustainable, profitable growth with strong and improving returns on our invested capital.

On October 26, 2018, we completed our acquisition of Pinnacle Foods Inc. ("Pinnacle"). As a result of the acquisition, Pinnacle became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

On November 9, 2016, we completed the spinoff of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. ("Lamb Weston") through a distribution of 100% of our interest in Lamb Weston to holders, as of November 1, 2016, of outstanding shares of our common stock (the "Spinoff"). The transaction effecting this change was structured as a tax-free spinoff.

In January 2013, we acquired Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. ("Ralcorp"), a manufacturer of private branded food. Since the acquisition of Ralcorp, we focused on addressing executional shortfalls and customer service issues intended to improve operating performance for our Private Brands business. However, after further review of the Private Brands business, we changed our strategic direction and divested the Private Brands business in the third quarter of fiscal 2016.
Financial Information about Reporting Segments
We reflect our results of operations in five reporting segments: Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, International, Foodservice, and Commercial. The contributions of each reporting segment to net sales, operating profit, and identifiable assets are set forth in Note 21 "Business Segments and Related Information" to the consolidated financial statements.

Narrative Description of Business

We compete throughout the food industry and focus on adding value for our customers who operate in the retail food and foodservice channels.

Our operations, including our reporting segments, are described below. Our locations, including manufacturing facilities, within each reporting segment, are described in Item 2, Properties.



Reporting Segments

Our reporting segments are as follows:

Grocery & Snacks

The Grocery & Snacks reporting segment principally includes branded, shelf stableshelf-stable food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.

Refrigerated & Frozen

The Refrigerated & Frozen reporting segment principally includes branded, temperature-controlled food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.


International

The International reporting segment principally includes branded food products, in various temperature states, sold in various retail and foodservice channels outside of the United States.

Foodservice

The Foodservice reporting segment includes branded and customized food products, including meals, entrees, sauces, and a variety of custom-manufactured culinary products packaged for sale to restaurants and other foodservice establishments primarily in the United States.

Commercial Foods
The Commercial reporting segment included commercially branded and private label food and ingredients, which were sold primarily to commercial, restaurant, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items included a variety of vegetable, spice, and frozen bakery goods, which were sold under brands such as Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings®. In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we sold our Spicetec and JM Swank businesses. These businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations.

Unconsolidated Equity Investments

We have threetwo unconsolidated equity investments. Our most significant equity method investment is Ardent Mills, a milling business.

Acquisitions

On October 26, 2018, we completed the acquisition of Pinnacle, a branded packaged foods company specializing in shelf-stable and frozen foods. As a result of the acquisition, Pinnacle became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 26, 2018 subsequent(the "Merger Agreement"), among Conagra Brands, Pinnacle, and Patriot Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Conagra Brands that ceased to exist at the endeffective time of fiscal 2018, we entered into a definitivethe merger, agreement with Pinnacle Foods Inc. ("Pinnacle") under which we plan to acquire all outstanding shareseach share of Pinnacle common stock in a cashissued and stock transaction valued at approximately $10.9 billion, including Pinnacle's outstanding net debt. Underimmediately prior to the termseffective time of the merger agreement, Pinnacle shareholders willwas converted into the right to receive (i) $43.11 per share in cash and (ii) 0.6494 shares of our common stock, for eachpar value $5.00 per share, of the Company ("Company Shares") (together, the "Merger Consideration"), with cash payable in lieu of fractional shares of Company Shares. The total amount of consideration paid in connection with the acquisition was approximately $8.03 billion and consisted of: (1) cash of $5.17 billion ($5.12 billion, net of cash acquired); (2) 77.5 million Company Shares, with an approximate value of $2.82 billion, issued out of the Company's treasury to former holders of Pinnacle common stock held. The impliedstock; and (3) replacement awards issued to former Pinnacle employees representing the fair value attributable to pre-combination service of $51.1 million. Approximately $7.03 billion of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and approximately $3.52 billion was allocated to brands, trademarks and other intangibles. Of the total goodwill, $236.7 million is deductible for tax purposes. Amortizable brands, trademarks and other intangibles totaled $668.7 million. Indefinite lived brands, trademarks and other intangibles totaled $2.85 billion. In the first quarter of $68.00 perfiscal 2020, we reorganized our reporting segments to incorporate the Pinnacle shareoperations into our legacy reporting segment in order to better reflect how the business is based onnow being managed. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the volume-weighted average pricerevised segment presentation and the results of the Pinnacle business are now included in each of our stock for the five days ended June 21, 2018. The planned acquisition is expected to close by the end of calendar 2018 and remains subject to the approval of Pinnacle shareholders, the receipt of regulatory approvals, and other customary closing conditions.

reporting segments outlined above.

In February 2018, we acquired the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business, maker of frozen breakfast and entree flatbread pocket sandwiches. This business is included in the Refrigerated & Frozen segment.

In October 2017, we acquired Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, maker of Angie's®BOOMCHICKAPOP® ready-to-eat popcorn.  This business is primarily included in the Grocery & Snacks segment.

In April 2017,

Divestitures

During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, we acquired protein-based snacking businesses Thanasi Foods LLC, makercompleted the sale of Duke’sour Lender's® meat snacks, and BIGS LLC, maker bagel business for net proceeds of BIGS$33.2 million, subject to final working capital adjustments. The results of operations of the divested Lender's® seeds. These businesses are bagel business were primarily included in our Refrigerated & Frozen segment, and to a lesser extent within our Foodservice segment, for the periods preceding the completion of the transaction. The assets and liabilities of this business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented prior to the divestiture.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2020, we completed the sale of our Direct Store Delivery ("DSD") snacks business for net proceeds of $137.5 million, including working capital adjustments. The results of operations of the divested DSD snacks business were included in our Grocery & Snacks segment.

In September 2016,segment for the periods preceding the completion of the transaction. The assets and liabilities of this business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented prior to the divestiture.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, we acquiredcompleted the operating assetssale of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC,our Italian-based frozen pasta business, Gelit, for proceeds net of cash divested of $80.1 million, including final working capital adjustments. The results of operations of this


divested business were primarily included in our Refrigerated & Frozen segment for the Fronteraperiods preceding the completion of the transaction.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, we completed the sale of our Wesson®, Red Fork oil business for net proceeds of $168.3 million, including final working capital adjustments. The results of operations of the divested Wesson®, and Salpica® brands (the "Frontera acquisition"). These businesses make authentic, gourmet Mexican food products and contemporary American cooking sauces. These businesses are reflected principally within the oil business were primarily included in our Grocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent within the Refrigerated & FrozenFoodservice and International segments.



Divestitures
Insegments, for the thirdperiods preceding the completion of the transaction.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2018,2019, we entered into an agreement to sellcompleted the sale of our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada and completed the sale in July 2018, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2018. The assets of this business have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we signed an agreement to sell our Wesson® oil business. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the agreement was terminated. This outcome followed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission, announced on March 5, 2018, to challenge the pending sale. The Company is still actively marketing the Wesson® oil business and expects to sell it within the next twelve months. The assets of this business have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.
On November 9, 2016, we completed the Spinoff of our Lamb Weston business. As of such date, we did not beneficially own any equity interest in Lamb Weston and no longer consolidated Lamb Weston into our financial results. We reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the sales of our Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business ("Spicetec") and our JM Swank business for combined proceeds of $489.0$32.2 million. The results of operations of Spicetec and JM Swank arethe divested Del Monte®business were included in our International segment for the Commercial segment.
On February 1, 2016, pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated asperiods preceding the completion of November 1, 2015, we completed the disposition of our Private Brands operations to TreeHouse Foods, Inc. ("Treehouse"). We reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
transaction.

General

The following comments pertain to all of our reporting segments.

Conagra Brands is a branded consumer packaged goods food company that operates in many sectors of the food industry, with a significant focus on the sale of branded, private branded, and value-added consumer food, as well as foodservice items and ingredients. We use many different raw materials, the bulk of which are commodities. The prices paid for raw materials used in making our food generally reflect factors such as weather, commodity market fluctuations, currency fluctuations, tariffs, and the effects of governmental agricultural programs. Although the prices of raw materials can be expected to fluctuate as a result of these factors, we believe such raw materials to be in adequate supply and generally available from numerous sources. From time to time, we have faced increased costs for many of our significant raw materials, packaging, and energy inputs. We seek to mitigate higher input costs through productivity and pricing initiatives and the use of derivative instruments to economically hedge a portion of forecasted future consumption.

We experience intense competition for sales of our food items in our major markets. Our food items compete with widely advertised, well-known, branded food, as well as private branded and customized food items. Some of our competitors are larger and have greater resources than we have. We compete primarily on the basis of quality, value, customer service, brand recognition, and brand loyalty.

Demand for certain of our food items may be influenced by holidays, changes in seasons, or other annual events.

For example, sales of frozen foods tend to be marginally higher during the winter months, seafood sales are highest during Lent, in advance of the Easter holiday, and production of certain of our products occurs seasonally, during or immediately following the purchase of agricultural crops.

We manufacture, primarily for stock and fill, our customer orders from finished goods inventories. While at any given time there may be some backlog of orders, such backlog is not material in respect to annual net sales, and the changes of backlog orders from time to time are not significant.

Our intellectual property rights, including our trademarks, licensing agreements, trade secrets, patents, and copyrights are of material importance to our business and are protectedwe attempt to protect such rights by registration or other means in the United Statespursuing remedies available to us under trademark, copyright, trade secret, and most other markets where the related food items are sold.patent laws, as well as entering into licensing, third-party nondisclosure and assignment agreements and policing of third-party misuses of our intellectual property. Some of our food items are sold under brands that have been licensed from others.others, including P.F. Chang’s®, Bertolli®, and Libby’s® trademarks. We also own certain intellectual property rights that are licensed to third parties, such as the Alexia® trademark. While many of these licensing arrangements are perpetual in nature, others must be periodically renegotiated or renewed pursuant to the terms of such licensing arrangement. We also actively develop and maintain a portfolio of patents, although no single patent is considered material to the business as a whole. We have proprietary trade secrets, technology, know-how, processes, and other intellectual property rights that are not registered.

Many of our facilities and products we make are subject to various laws and regulations administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other federal, state, local, and foreign governmental agencies relating to the food safety and quality, sanitation, safety and health matters, and environmental control. We believe that we comply with such laws and regulations in all material respects



and that continued compliance with such regulations will not have a material effect upon capital expenditures, earnings, or our competitive position.


Our largest customer, Walmart, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 26% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2020 and 24% of consolidated net sales for botheach of fiscal 20182019 and 2017 and 23%2018.

As of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2016.

At May 27, 2018,31, 2020, Conagra Brands and its subsidiaries had approximately 12,40016,500 employees, primarily in the United States. Approximately 43%52% of our employees are parties to collective bargaining agreements. Of the employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, approximately 47%5% are parties to collective bargaining agreements scheduled to expire during fiscal 2019.2021. We believe our relationships with employees and their representative organizations are good.
Research

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The names, ages, and Development

We employ processes atpositions of our principal manufacturing locations that emphasize applied research and technical services directed at product improvement and quality control. In addition, we conduct research activities related to the developmentexecutive officers as of new products. Research and development expense was $47.3 million, $44.6 million, and $59.6 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.July 24, 2020 are listed below:

Name

 

Title & Capacity

 

Age

 

Year First

Appointed an

Executive

Officer

Sean M. Connolly

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

54

 

 

2015

David S. Marberger

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

55

 

 

2016

Colleen R. Batcheler

 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

 

46

 

 

2008

David B. Biegger

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer

 

61

 

 

2015

Charisse Brock

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer

 

58

 

 

2015

Thomas M. McGough

 

Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Operating Officer

 

55

 

 

2013

Darren C. Serrao

 

Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Operating Officer

 

54

 

 

2015

Robert G. Wise

 

Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller

 

52

 

 

2012


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF JULY 20, 2018
Name Title & Capacity Age 
Year First
Appointed an
Executive
Officer
Sean M. Connolly President and Chief Executive Officer 52
 2015
David S. Marberger Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 53
 2016
Colleen R. Batcheler Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary 44
 2008
David B. Biegger Executive Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer 59
 2015
Charisse Brock Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer 56
 2015
Thomas M. McGough President, Operating Segments 53
 2013
Darren C. Serrao Executive Vice President, Chief Growth Officer 52
 2015
Robert G. Wise Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller 50
 2012

Sean M. Connolly has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors since April 6, 2015.  Prior to that, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of The Hillshire Brands Company (a branded food products company) from June 2012 to August 2014, Executive Vice President of Sara Lee Corporation (the predecessor to Hillshire), and Chief Executive Officer, Sara Lee North American Retail and Foodservice, from January 2012 to June 2012. Prior to joining Hillshire, Mr. Connolly served as President of Campbell North America, the largest division of Campbell Soup Company (a branded convenience food products company), from October 2010 to December 2011, President, Campbell USA from 2008 to 2010, and President, North American Foodservice for Campbell from 2007 to 2008. Before joining Campbell in 2002, he served in various marketing and brand management roles at The Procter & Gamble Company (a consumer productpackaged goods company).

David S. Marberger has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2016. Prior to joining Conagra Brands, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. (a provider of over-the-counter healthcare products) from October 2015 until July 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Marberger served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. (a global manufacturer and supplier of premium chocolates) from 2008 until October 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Marberger served Tasty Baking Company (a manufacturer and supplier of baked goods) as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2008 and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to 2006. From 1993 until 2003, he served in various roles at Campbell Soup Company (a branded food products company), where he last held the position of Vice President, Finance, Food and Beverage Division.

Colleen R. Batcheler has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since September 2009 and served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from February 2008 until September 2009. Ms. Batcheler joined Conagra Brands in June 2006 as Vice President, Chief Securities Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary. In September 2006, she was named Corporate Secretary. From 2003 until joining Conagra Brands, Ms. Batcheler



served as Vice President and Corporate Secretary of Albertson's, Inc. (a retail food and drug chain). Prior to that, she served as Associate Counsel with The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (a non-profit academic medical center) and an associate with Jones Day (a law firm).

David B. Biegger has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer since October 2015. Prior to joining Conagra Brands, Mr. Biegger spent nearly 11 years at the Campbell Soup Company (a branded food products company), where he served as Senior Vice President, Global Supply Chain from February 2014 until October 2015 and was responsible for the global supply chain of that company, including manufacturing, quality, safety, engineering, procurement, logistics,


environmental sustainability, and customer service. Prior to joining Campbell Soup Company, he spent 24 years in supply chain roles at The Procter & Gamble Co.Company (a consumer packaged goods corporation)company).

Charisse Brock has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since November 2015 and as Senior Vice President and Interim Chief Human Resources Officer from August 2015 until November 2015. Prior to serving in these roles, Ms. Brock served as Vice President of Human Resources for the Consumer Foods segment of Conagra Brands from September 2010 until August 2015. Ms. Brock joined Conagra Brands in 2004 as Director of Human Resources, supporting the Refrigerated Foods Group. Prior to joining Conagra Brands, she served for 15 years at The Quaker Oats Company (a branded food products company) (which was acquired by PepsiCo during her tenure) in its Consumer Foods Division.

Thomas M. McGough has served as Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Operating Officer since October 2018. Prior to that, he served as the Company's President, Operating Segments sincefrom May 2017 until October 2018 and as the Company's President of Consumer Foods from May 2013 until May 2017. Mr. McGough joined Conagra Brands in 2007 as Vice President in the Consumer Foods organization and has provided leadership for many brand teams within Conagra Brands, including Banquet®, Hunt's®, and Reddi-wip®. He most recentlyalso served as President, Grocery Products from 2011 until May 2013 leadingand as Vice President in the largest business within theCompany's Consumer Foods segment.organization from 2007 to 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McGough has over 25 of experienceserved in the branded packaged foods industry andvarious roles at H.J. Heinz (a food processing company), where he began his career at H.J. Heinz in 1990.

Darren C. Serrao has served as Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Operating Officer since October 2018. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President, Chief Growth Officer sincefrom August 2015. As head of the Growth Center of Excellence, Mr. Serrao leads efforts2015 to bring together insights, innovation, research and development, and marketing teams to improve connectivity and boost speed-to-market, ensuring that strong insights lead to relevant and timely products with the right marketing support.October 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Serrao served as Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing and Commercial Officer at Campbell Soup Company (a branded food products company) from February 2015 until August 2015 during which period he led the company's U.S. consumer business (its largest line of business). Prior to that, he servedand as Senior Vice President of Innovation and Business Development for Campbell North America from July 2011 until February 2015. Mr. Serrao has also held several profit and loss and marketing positions during his career, including roles with PepsiCo and Unilever.

Robert G. Wise has served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller since December 2012. Mr. Wise joined Conagra Brands in March 2003 and has held various positions of increasing responsibility with Conagra Brands, including Vice President, Assistant Corporate Controller from March 2006 until January 2012 and as Vice President, Corporate Controller from January 2012 until December 2012. Prior to joining Conagra Brands, Mr. Wise served in various roles at KPMG LLP (an accounting firm) from October 1995 until March 2003.


Foreign Operations

Foreign operations information is set forth in Note 21 20 "Business Segments and Related Information" to the consolidated financial statements.


statements contained in this report.

Available Information

We make available, free of charge through the "Investors—Financial Reports & Filings" link on our Internet website at http://www.conagrabrands.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). We use our Internet website, through the "Investors" link, as a channel for routine distribution of important information, including news releases, analyst presentations, and financial information. The information on our website is not, and will not be deemed to be, a part of this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated into any of our other filings with the SEC.



We have also posted on our website our (1) Corporate Governance Principles, (2) Code of Conduct, (3) Code of Ethics for Senior Corporate Officers, and (4) Charters for the Audit/Finance Committee, Nominating, Governance and Public Affairs Committee, and Human Resources Committee. Shareholders may also obtain copies of these items at no charge by writing to: Corporate Secretary, Conagra Brands, Inc., 222 Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1300, Chicago, IL, 60654.


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS


Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Any of the risks and uncertainties described below could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and should be considered in evaluating us. While we believe we have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting our business, there may be additional risks


and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our business, performance, or financial condition in the future.

Risks Relating to our Business

The COVID-19 pandemic could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In December 2019, there was an outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) in China that has since spread to nearly all regions of the world. The outbreak was subsequently declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. To date, the COVID-19 outbreak and preventative measures taken to contain or mitigate the outbreak have caused, and are continuing to cause, business slowdowns or shutdowns in affected areas and significant disruption in the financial markets both globally and in the United States.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and related mitigation measures, we created an internal COVID-19 pandemic team in order to review and assess the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and began implementing changes in our business in March 2020 to protect our employees and customers, and to support appropriate health and safety protocols. For example, we installed physical barriers between employees in production facilities, implemented extensive cleaning and sanitation processes for both production and office spaces, and implemented broad work-from-home initiatives for office personnel. While all of these measures have been necessary and appropriate, they have resulted in additional costs, which we expect will continue in fiscal 2021 as we work to address employee safety.

Although we have experienced some challenges in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, including temporary closings of production facilities and reduced demand for certain of our products, at this time, we have not experienced a net negative impact on our liquidity or results of operations. While we generally expect demand levels for our products to return to historical norms as we progress through fiscal 2021, we are unable to predict the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 outbreak, including the nature and timing of when such demand normalization may occur. The continued spread of COVID-19 could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations in a number of ways in the future, including but not limited to:

further shutdowns or slowdowns of one or more of our production facilities;

disruptions in our supply chain and our ability to obtain ingredients, packaging and other sourced materials due to labor shortages, governmental restrictions or the failure of our suppliers, distributors or manufacturers to meet their obligations to us;

strains on our supply chain due to increased consumer demand for certain of our products as a result of increased at-home consumption;

increases in raw material and commodity costs;

the inability of a significant portion of our workforce, including our management team, to work as a result of illness or government restrictions;

shifts and volatility in consumer spending and purchasing behaviors due to the economic downturn;

decreased consumer traffic in away-from-home food outlets; and

reduced availability of credit or financing upon acceptable terms or at all.

The situation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic remains fluid, and given its inherent uncertainty, we expect that it could have an adverse impact on our business in the future. The duration and extent of the impact from the COVID-19 pandemic depends on future developments that cannot be accurately predicted at this time, such as the severity and transmission rate of the virus, the extent and effectiveness of containment actions and the impact of these and other factors on our employees, customers, suppliers, distributors and manufacturers. Should these conditions persist for a prolonged period, the COVID-19 pandemic, including any of the above factors and others that are currently unknown, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic may also exacerbate other risks discussed in this Item 1A, Risk Factors, any of which could have a material effect on us.    

Deterioration of general economic conditions could harm our business and results of operations.

Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in national or global economic conditions, including inflation, interest rates, availability of capital markets, consumer spending rates, energy availability and costs (including


fuel surcharges), the negative impacts caused by pandemics and public health crises (including the COVID-19 pandemic), and the effects of governmental initiatives to manage economic conditions.

Volatility in financial markets and deterioration of national and global economic conditions could impact our business and operations in a variety of ways, including as follows:

consumers may shift purchases to more generic, lower-priced, or other value offerings, or may forego certain purchases altogether during economic downturns, which could result in a reduction in sales of higher margin products or a shift in our product mix to lower margin offerings adversely affecting the results of our operations;

restrictions on public gatherings or interactions may limit the opportunity for our customers and consumers to purchase our products;

decreased demand in the restaurant business (including due to the COVID-19 pandemic), particularly casual and fine dining, may adversely affect our Foodservice operations;

volatility in commodity and other input costs could substantially impact our result of operations;

volatility in the equity markets or interest rates could substantially impact our pension costs and required pension contributions; and

it may become more costly or difficult to obtain debt or equity financing to fund operations or investment opportunities, or to refinance our debt in the future, in each case on terms and within a time period acceptable to us.

Our existing and future debt may limit cash flow available to invest in the ongoing needs of our business and could prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.

As of May 31, 2020, we had total debt of approximately $9.75 billion, including approximately $9.44 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes. Our ability to make payments on our debt, fund our other liquidity needs, and make planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our historical financial results have been, and we anticipate that our future financial results will be, subject to fluctuations. Our ability to generate cash, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot guarantee that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from our operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to make payments of our debt, fund other liquidity needs, and make planned capital expenditures.

Our level of debt could have important consequences for shareholders. For example, it could:

make it more difficult for us to satisfy our debt service obligations;

restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or taking advantage of favorable business opportunities;

restrict us from repurchasing shares of our common stock;

limit flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in the businesses and industries in which we operate, which may adversely affect our operating results and ability to meet our debt service obligations;

limit our ability to refinance our indebtedness or increase the cost of such indebtedness;

require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes;  

increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions, including changes in interest rates;

limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures, acquisitions, investment, debt service obligations, and other general operating requirements or to enable us to react to changes in our business; or

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to businesses in our industry that have less debt.

Additionally, any failure to meet required payments on our debt, or failure to comply with any covenants in the instruments governing our debt, could result in an event of default under the terms of those instruments and a reduction in sales of higher margin products or a shiftdowngrade to our credit ratings. A downgrade in our product mixcredit ratings would increase our borrowing costs and could affect our ability to lower margin offerings adversely affectingissue commercial paper. In the resultsevent of a default, the holders of our operations;debt could elect to declare all the amounts outstanding under such instruments to be due


decreased demand

and payable. Any default under the agreements governing our debt and the remedies sought by the holders of such debt could render us unable to pay principal and interest on our debt.

A significant portion of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow for our needs is dependent to some extent on the earnings of our subsidiaries and the payment of those earnings to us in the restaurantform of dividends, loans, or advances and through repayment of loans or advances from us. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities. Our subsidiaries have no obligation to pay any amounts due on our debt to provide us with funds to meet our cash flow needs, whether in the form of dividends, distributions, loans, or other payments. In addition, any payment of dividends, loans, or advances by our subsidiaries could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. Payments to us by our subsidiaries will also be contingent upon our subsidiaries' earnings and business particularly casualconsiderations. Our right to receive any assets of any of our subsidiaries upon their liquidation or reorganization will be effectively subordinated to the claims of that subsidiary's creditors, including trade creditors. In addition, even if we are a creditor of any of our subsidiaries, our rights as a creditor would be subordinate to any security interest in the assets of our subsidiaries and fine dining,any indebtedness of our subsidiaries senior to that held by us. Finally, changes in the laws of foreign jurisdictions in which we operate may adversely affect the ability of some of our Foodservice operations;

volatility in commodity and other input costs could substantially impact our result of operations;
volatility in the equity markets or interest rates could substantially impact our pension costs and required pension contributions; and
it may become more costly or difficultforeign subsidiaries to obtain debt or equity financing to fund operations or investment opportunities, or to refinance our debt in the future, in each case on terms and within a time period acceptablerepatriate funds to us.

Increased competition may result in reduced sales or profits.

The food industry is highly competitive, and further consolidation in the industry would likely increase competition. Our principal competitors have substantial financial, marketing, and other resources. Increased competition can reduce our sales due to loss of market share or the need to reduce prices to respond to competitive and customer pressures. Competitive pressures also may restrict our ability to increase prices, including in response to commodity and other cost increases. We sell branded, private brand, and customized food products, as well as commercially branded foods. Our branded products have an advantage over private brand products primarily due to advertising and name recognition, although private brand products typically sell at a discount to those of branded competitors. In addition, when branded competitors focus on price and promotion, the environment for private brand producers becomes more challenging because the price difference between private brand products and branded products may become less significant. In most product categories, we compete not only with other widely advertised branded products, but also with other private label and store brand products that are generally sold at lower prices. A strong competitive response from one or more of our competitors to our marketplace efforts, or a consumer shift towards more generic, lower-priced, or other value offerings, could result in us reducing pricing, increasing marketing or other expenditures, or losing market share. Our margins and profits could decrease if a reduction in prices or increased costs are not counterbalanced with increased sales volume.



In addition, substantial growth in e-commerce has encouraged the entry of new competitors and business models, intensifying competition by simplifying distribution and lowering barriers to entry. The expanding presence of e-commerce retailers has impacted, and may continue to impact, consumer preferences and market dynamics, which in turn may negatively affect our sales or profits.

Increases in commodity costs may have a negative impact on profits.

We use many different commodities such as wheat, corn, oats, soybeans, beef, pork, poultry, steel,aluminum, and energy. Commodities are subject to price volatility caused by commodity market fluctuations, supply and demand, currency fluctuations, external conditions such as weather, and changes in governmental agricultural and energy policies and regulations. In addition, recent world events have increased the risks posed by international trade disputes, tariffs, and sanctions. We procure a wide spectrum of commodities globally and could potentially face increased prices for commodities sourced from nations that could be impacted by trade disputes, tariffs, or sanctions. Commodity price increases will result in increases in raw material, packaging, and energy costs and operating costs. We may not be able to increase our product prices and achieve cost savings that fully offset these increased costs; and increasing prices may result in reduced sales volume, reduced margins, and profitability. We have experience in hedging against commodity price increases; however, these practices and experience reduce, but do not eliminate, the risk of negative profit impacts from commodity price increases. We do not fully hedge against changes in commodity prices, and the risk management procedures that we use may not always work as we intend.

Volatility in the market value of derivatives we use to manage exposures to fluctuations in commodity prices will cause volatility in our gross margins and net earnings.

We utilize derivatives to manage price risk for some of our principal ingredients and energy costs, including grains (wheat, corn, and oats), oils, beef, pork, poultry, and energy. Changes in the values of these derivatives are generally recorded in earnings


currently, resulting in volatility in both gross margin and net earnings. These gains and losses are reported in cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of OperationsEarnings and in unallocated general corporate expenses in our segment operating results until we utilize the underlying input in our manufacturing process, at which time the gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating profit. We may experience volatile earnings as a result of these accounting treatments.

If we do not achieve the appropriate cost structure in the highly competitive food industry, our profitability could decrease.

Our future success and earnings growth depend in part on our ability to achieve the appropriate cost structure and operate efficiently in the highly competitive food industry, particularly in an environment of volatile input costs. We continue to implement profit-enhancing initiatives that impact our supply chain and general and administrative functions. These initiatives are focused on cost-saving opportunities in procurement, manufacturing, logistics, and customer service, as well as general and administrative overhead levels. Gaining additional efficiencies may become more difficult over time. Our failure to reduce costs through productivity gains or by eliminating redundant costs resulting from acquisitions could adversely affect our profitability and weaken our competitive position. If we do not continue to effectively manage costs and achieve additional efficiencies, our competitiveness and our profitability could decrease.

We may not realize the benefits that we expect from our Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan, or SCAErestructuring plans, including the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan.

In May 2013,fiscal 2019, we announced a restructuring and integration plan related to the Supply Chainongoing integration of Pinnacle for the purpose of achieving significant cost synergies (the "Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan"). We expect to incur material charges for exit and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the "SCAE Plan"), our plan to integrate and restructure the operations of our Private Brands business, improve selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") effectiveness and efficiencies, and optimize our supply chain network, manufacturing assets, dry distribution centers, and mixing centers. In fiscal 2016, we announced plans to realize efficiency benefits by reducing SG&A expenses and enhancing trade spend processes and tools, which plans were included in the SCAE Plan. Although we divested the Private Brands business, we have continued to implement the SCAE Plan, including by working to optimize our supply chain network, pursue cost reductions through our SG&A functions, enhance trade spend processes and tools, and improve productivity.

disposal activities under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The successful design and implementation of the SCAEPinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan presents significant organizational design and infrastructure challenges and inchallenges. In many cases, it will require successful negotiations with third parties, including labor organizations, suppliers, business partners, and other stakeholders. In addition, the SCAEPinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan may not advance our business strategy as expected. Events and circumstances, such as financial or strategic difficulties, delays, and unexpected costs may occur that could result in our not realizing all or any of the anticipated benefits or our not realizing the anticipated benefits on our expected timetable. If we are unable to realize the anticipated savings and cost synergies of the SCAEPinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan, our ability to fund other initiatives may be adversely affected. Any failure to implement the SCAEPinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan in accordance with our expectations could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.



In addition, the complexity of the SCAEPinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan will require a substantial amount of management and operational resources. Our management team must successfully implement administrative and operational changes necessary to achieve the anticipated benefits of the SCAEPinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan. These and related demands on our resources may divert the organization's attention from existing core businesses, integrating financial or other systems, have adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, and impact employee morale. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected.

We may be subject to product liability claims and product recalls, which could negatively impact our profitability.

We sell food products for human consumption, which involves risks such as product contamination or spoilage, product tampering, other adulteration of food products, mislabeling, and misbranding. We may be subject to liability if the consumption of any of our products causes injury, illness, or death. In addition, we will voluntarily recall products in the event of contamination or damage. We have issued recalls and have from time to time been and currently are involved in lawsuits relating to our food products. A significant product liability judgment or a widespread product recall may negatively impact our sales and profitability for a period of time depending on the costs of the recall, the destruction of product inventory, product availability, competitive reaction, customer reaction, and consumer attitudes. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image.

Additionally, as a manufacturer and marketer of food products, we are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other federal, state, and local government agencies. The Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (the "FDCA"), and the Food Safety Modernization Act and their respective regulations govern, among other things, the manufacturing, composition and ingredients, packaging, and safety of food products. Some aspects of these laws use a strict liability standard for imposing sanctions on corporate behavior; meaning that no intent is required to be established. If we fail to comply with applicable laws


and regulations, we may be subject to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls, or seizures, as well as criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

We must identify changing consumer preferences and develop and offer food products to meet their preferences.

Consumer preferences evolve over time and the success of our food products depends on our ability to identify the tastes and dietary habits of consumers and to offer products that appeal to their preferences, including concerns of consumers regarding health and wellness, obesity, product attributes, and ingredients. Introduction of new products and product extensions requires significant development and marketing investment. If our products fail to meet consumer preferences, or we fail to introduce new and improved products on a timely basis, then the return on that investment will be less than anticipated and our strategy to grow sales and profits with investments in acquisitions, marketing, and innovation will be less successful. Similarly, demand for our products could be affected by consumer concerns or perceptions regarding the health effects of ingredients such as sodium, trans fats, sugar, processed wheat, or other product ingredients or attributes.

Changes in our relationships with significant customers or suppliers could adversely affect us.

During fiscal 2018,2020, our largest customer, Walmart, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 24%26% of our consolidated net sales. There can be no assurance that Walmart, Inc. and other significant customers will continue to purchase our products in the same quantities or on the same terms as in the past, particularly as increasingly powerful retailers continue to demand lower pricing. The loss of a significant customer or a material reduction in sales to a significant customer could materially and adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.



The sophistication and buying power of our customers could have a negative impact on profits.

Our customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs, and food distributors, have continued to consolidate, resulting in fewer customers on which we can rely for business. These consolidations, the growth of supercenters, and the growth of on-linee-commerce customers have produced large, sophisticated customers with increased buying power and negotiating strength who are more capable of resisting price increases and can demand lower pricing, increased promotional programs, or specialty tailored products. In addition, larger retailers have the scale to develop supply chains that permit them to operate with reduced inventories or to develop and market their own retailer brands. These customers may also in the future use more of their shelf space, currently used for our products, for their store brand products. We continue to implement initiatives to counteract these pressures. However, if the larger size of these customers results in additional negotiating strength and/or increased private label or store brand competition, our profitability could decline.

Consolidation also increases the risk that adverse changes in our customers' business operations or financial performance will have a corresponding material adverse effect on us. For example, if our customers cannot access sufficient funds or financing, then they may delay, decrease, or cancel purchases of our products, or delay or fail to pay us for previous purchases.

If we are unable to complete proposed acquisitions or integrate acquired businesses, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

From time to time, we evaluate acquisition candidates that may strategically fit our business objectives. If we are unable to complete acquisitions or to successfully integrate and develop acquired businesses, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, we may incur asset impairment charges related to acquisitions that reduce our profitability.

Our acquisition activities may present financial, managerial, and operational risks. Those risks include diversion of management attention from existing businesses, difficulties integrating personnel and financial and other systems, effective and immediate implementation of control environment processes across our employee population, adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, inaccurate estimates of fair value made in the accounting for acquisitions and amortization of acquired intangible assets which would reduce future reported earnings, potential loss of customers or key employees of acquired businesses, and indemnities and potential disputes with the sellers. Any of these factors could affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.

In fiscal 2018, we completed the acquisitions of the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business for $87.3 million in cash, net of cash acquired, including working capital adjustments, and the Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC business, which included the Angie's® BOOMCHICKAPOP® ready-to-eat popcorn brand, for $249.8 million in cash, net of cash acquired, including working capital adjustments. In fiscal 2019, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Pinnacle pursuant to which, among other things and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of specified conditions, we plan to acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Pinnacle for cash and shares of Conagra Brands common stock. See "Risks Relating to our Planned Acquisition of Pinnacle" below for more information on risks relating to the planned acquisition of Pinnacle.

If we are unable to complete our proposed divestitures, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

From time to time, we may divest businesses that do not meet our strategic objectives or do not meet our growth or profitability targets. We may not be able to complete desired or proposed divestitures on terms favorable to us. Gains or losses on


the sales of, or lost operating income from, those businesses may affect our profitability and margins. Moreover, we may incur asset impairment charges related to divestitures that reduce our profitability.

Our divestiture activities may present financial, managerial, and operational risks. Those risks include diversion of management attention from existing businesses, difficulties separating personnel and financial and other systems, possible need for providing transition services to buyers, adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers and indemnities and potential disputes with the buyers. Any of these factors could adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.



Disruption of our supply chain could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our ability to make, move, and sell our products is critical to our success. Damage or disruption to our supply chain, including third-party manufacturing or transportation and distribution capabilities, due to weather, including any potential effects of climate change, natural disaster, fire or explosion, terrorism, pandemics (such as the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic), strikes, government action, or other reasons beyond our control or the control of our suppliers and business partners, could impair our ability to manufacture or sell our products. Failure to take adequate steps to mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, particularly when a product is sourced from a single supplier or location, could adversely affect our business or financial results. In addition, disputes with significant suppliers, including disputes regarding pricing or performance, could adversely affect our ability to supply products to our customers and could materially and adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.

In particular, we are actively monitoring the recent COVID-19 pandemic and its potential impact on our supply chain and our consolidated results of operations. Although our products are manufactured in North America and we source the significant majority of our ingredients and raw materials from North America, due to restrictions resulting from the pandemic, global supply may become constrained, which may cause the price of certain ingredients and raw materials used in our products to increase and/or we may experience disruptions to our operations.

Any damage to our reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Maintaining a good reputation globally is critical to selling our products. Product contamination or tampering, the failure to maintain high standards for product quality, safety, and integrity, including with respect to raw materials and ingredients obtained from suppliers, or allegations of product quality issues, mislabeling, or contamination, even if untrue, may reduce demand for our products or cause production and delivery disruptions. Our reputation could also be adversely impacted by any of the following, or by adverse publicity (whether or not valid) relating thereto: the failure to maintain high ethical, social, and environmental standards for all of our operations and activities; the failure to achieve any stated goals with respect to the nutritional profile of our products; our research and development efforts; or our environmental impact, including use of agricultural materials, packaging, energy use, and waste management. Moreover, the growing use of social and digital media by consumers has greatly increased the speed and extent that information or misinformation and opinions can be shared. Failure to comply with local laws and regulations, to maintain an effective system of internal controls or to provide accurate and timely financial information could also hurt our reputation. Damage to our reputation or loss of consumer confidence in our products for any of these or other reasons could result in decreased demand for our products and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation.

If we fail to comply with the many laws applicable to our business, we may face lawsuits or incur significant fines and penalties.

In addition, changes in such laws may lead to increased costs.

Our business is subject to a variety of governmental laws and regulations, including food and drug laws, environmental laws, laws related to advertising and marketing practices, accounting standards, taxation requirements, competition laws, employment laws, data privacy laws, and anti-corruption laws, among others, in and outside of the United States. Our facilities and products are subject to many laws and regulations administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other federal, state, local, and foreign governmental agencies relating to the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality, and safety of food products, the health and safety of our employees, and the protection of the environment. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject us to lawsuits, administrative penalties, and civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, and recalls of our products.  In addition, changes in applicable laws and regulations, including changes in taxation requirements and new or increased tariffs on products imported from certain countries, may lead to increased costs and could negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Our operations are also subject to extensive and increasingly stringent regulations administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, which pertain to the discharge of materials into the environment and the handling and disposition of wastes. Failure to comply with these regulations can have serious consequences, including civil and administrative penalties and negative publicity. Changes in applicable laws or regulations or evolving interpretations thereof, including increased government regulations to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions as a result of concern over climate change, may result in increased compliance costs, capital expenditures, and other financial obligations for us, which could affect our profitability or impede the production or distribution of our products, which couldand affect our net operating revenues.



We are increasingly dependent on

Our business operations could be disrupted if our information technology and potential disruption, cyber attacks, security problems, and expanding social media vehicles present new risks.

systems fail to perform adequately.

We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit, and store electronic and financial information, to manage and support a variety of business processes and activities, and to comply with regulatory, legal, and tax requirements. Our information technology systems, some of which are dependent on services provided by third parties, may be vulnerable to damage, interruption, or shutdown due to any number of causes outside of our control such as catastrophic events, natural disasters, fires, power outages, systems failures, telecommunications failures, employee error or malfeasance, security breaches, computer viruses hackers, employee error or malfeasance,other malicious codes, ransomware, unauthorized access attempts, denial of service attacks, phishing, hacking, and other causes. Increasedcyberattacks. While we have experienced threats to our data and systems, to date, we are not aware that we have experienced a material breach. However, over time, and particularly recently, the sophistication of these threats continues to increase. Sophisticated cybersecurity threats pose a potential risk to the security and viability of our information technology systems, as well as the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data stored on those systems. systems, including cloud-based platforms. In addition, new technology that could result in greater operational efficiency may further expose our computer systems to the risk of cyber-attacks. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology infrastructure and to maintain and protect the relatedassociated automated and manual control processes, we could be subject to billing and collection errors, business disruptions, or damage resulting from security breaches. If any of our significant information technology systems suffer severe damage, disruption, or shutdown, and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results. In addition, there is a risk of business interruption, violation of data privacy laws and regulations, litigation, and reputational damage from leakage of confidential information. Any interruption of our information technology systems could have operational, reputational, legal, and financial impacts that may have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, the inappropriate use of certain media vehicles could cause brand damage or information leakage. Negative posts or comments about the Company on any social networking web site could seriously damage its reputation. In addition, the disclosure of non-public company sensitive information through external media channels could lead to information loss. Identifying new points of entry as social media continues to expand presents new challenges. Any business interruptions or damage to our reputation could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations, and the market price of our common stock.

Additionally, we regularly move data across national borders to conduct our operations and, consequently, are subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States and other jurisdictions regarding privacy, data protection, and data security, including those related to the collection, storage, handling, use, disclosure, transfer, and security of personal data. There is significant uncertainty with respect to compliance with such privacy and data, protection laws and regulations, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, because theyRegulation. Our efforts to comply with privacy and data protection laws may impose significant costs and challenges that are continuously evolving and developing and may be interpreted and applied differently from countrylikely to country and may create inconsistent or conflicting requirements.

increase over time.

We rely on our management team and other key personnel.

We depend on the skills, working relationships, and continued services of key personnel, including our experienced management team. In addition, our ability to achieve our operating goals depends on our ability to identify, hire, train, and retain qualified individuals. We compete with other companies both within and outside of our industry for talented personnel, and we may lose key personnel or fail to attract, train, and retain other talented personnel. Any such loss or failure could adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and operating results.

In particular, our continued success will depend in part on our ability to retain the talents and dedication of key employees. If key employees terminate their employment, become ill as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, or if an insufficient number of employees is retained to maintain effective operations, our business activities may be adversely affected and our management team's attention may be diverted. In addition, we may not be able to locate suitable replacements for any key employees who leave, or offer employment to potential replacements on reasonable terms, all of which could adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and operating results.

Our existing and future debt may limit cash flow available to invest in the ongoing needs of our business and could prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.
As of May 27, 2018, we had a substantial amount of debt, including approximately $2.9 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes. We have the ability under our existing revolving credit facility to incur substantial additional debt. Our level of debt could have important consequences. For example, it could:
make it more difficult for us to make payments on our debt;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, reducing


the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions;
limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to enable us to react to changes in our business; or
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to businesses in our industry that have less debt.
Additionally, any failure to meet required payments on our debt, or failure to comply with any covenants in the instruments governing our debt, could result in an event of default under the terms of those instruments and a downgrade to our credit ratings. A downgrade in our credit ratings would increase our borrowing costs and could affect our ability to issue commercial paper. In the event of a default, the holders of our debt could elect to declare all the amounts outstanding under such instruments to be due and payable. Any default under the agreements governing our debt and the remedies sought by the holders of such debt could render us unable to pay principal and interest on our debt.

Impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangibles could result in the incurrence of impairment charges and negatively impact our net worth.

As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we had goodwill of $4.5$11.44 billion and other intangibles of $1.3$4.32 billion. The net carrying value of goodwill represents the fair value of acquired businesses in excess of identifiable assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date (or subsequent impairment date, if applicable). The net carrying value of other intangibles represents the fair value of trademarks,


customer relationships, and other acquired intangibles as of the acquisition date (or subsequent impairment date, if applicable), net of accumulated amortization. Goodwill and other acquired intangibles expected to contribute indefinitely to our cash flows are not amortized, but must be evaluated by management at least annually for impairment. Amortized intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be recoverable. Impairments to goodwill and other intangible assets may be caused by factors outside our control, such as the inability to quickly replace lost co-manufacturing business, increasing competitive pricing pressures, lower than expected revenue and profit growth rates, changes in industry EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiples, changes in discount rates based on changes in cost of capital (interest rates, etc.), or the bankruptcy of a significant customer and could result in the incurrence of impairment charges andnegatively impact our net worth.

Our results could be adversely impacted as a result of increased pension, labor, and people-related expenses.

Inflationary pressures and any shortages in the labor market could increase labor costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. Our labor costs include the cost of providing employee benefits in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, including pension, health and welfare, and severance benefits. Changes in interest rates, mortality rates, health care costs, early retirement rates, investment returns, and the market value of plan assets can affect the funded status of our defined benefit plans and cause volatility in the future funding requirements of the plans. A significant increase in our obligations or future funding requirements could have a negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows from operations. Additionally, the annual costs of benefits vary with increased costs of health care and the outcome of collectively-bargained wage and benefit agreements.

Climate change, or legal, regulatory, or market measures to address climate change, may negatively affect our business and operations.

There is growing concern that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns, and the frequency and severity of extreme weather and natural disasters. In the event that such climate change has a negative effect on agricultural productivity, we may be subject to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commodities that are necessary for our products, such as corn, wheat, and potatoes. Adverse weather conditions and natural disasters can reduce crop size and crop quality, which in turn could reduce our supplies of raw materials, lower recoveries of usable raw materials, increase the prices of our raw materials, increase our cost of transporting and storing raw materials, or disrupt our production schedules.

We may also be subjected to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for water as a result of such change, which could impact our manufacturing and distribution operations. In addition, natural disasters and extreme weather conditions may disrupt the productivity of our facilities or the operation of our supply chain. The increasing concern over climate change also may result in more regional, federal, and/or global legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of greenhouse gases. In the event that such regulation is enacted and is more aggressive than the sustainability measures that we are currently undertaking to monitor our emissions and improve our energy efficiency, we may experience significant increases in our costs of operation and delivery. In particular, increasing regulation of fuel emissions could substantially increase the distribution and supply chain costs associated with our products. As a result, climate change could negatively affect our business and operations.



Due to the seasonality of the business, our revenue and operating results may vary from quarter to quarter.

Our sales and cash flows are affected by seasonal cyclicality. Sales of frozen foods, including frozen vegetables and frozen complete bagged meals, tend to be marginally higher during the winter months. Seafood sales peak during Lent, in advance of the Easter holiday. Since many of the raw materials we process are agricultural crops, production of these products is predominantly seasonal, occurring during and immediately following the purchase of such crops. For these reasons, sequential quarterly comparisons are not a good indication of our performance or how we may perform in the future. If we are unable to obtain access to working capital or if seasonal fluctuations are greater than anticipated, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

The termination or expiration of current co-manufacturing arrangements could reduce our sales volume and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our businesses periodically enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with manufacturers of products. The terms of these agreements vary but are generally for relatively short periods of time. Volumes produced under each of these agreements can fluctuate significantly based upon the product's life cycle, product promotions, alternative production capacity, and other factors, none of which are under our direct control. Our future ability to enter into co-manufacturing arrangements is not guaranteed, and a decrease in current co-manufacturing levels could have a significant negative impact on sales volume.


Ardent Mills may not achieve the benefits that are anticipated from the joint venture.
The benefits that are expected to result from our Ardent Mills joint venture will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost synergies in the transaction, Ardent Mills' ability to successfully integrate the ConAgra Mills and Horizon Milling businesses and its ability to successfully manage the joint venture on a going-forward basis. It is not certain that we will realize these benefits at all, and if we do, it is not certain how long it will take to achieve these benefits. If, for example, we are unable to achieve the anticipated cost savings, or if there are unforeseen integration costs, or if Ardent Mills is unable to operate the joint venture smoothly in the future, the financial performance of the joint venture may be negatively affected.

As we outsource certain functions, we become more dependent on the third parties performing those functions.

As part of a concerted effort to achieve cost savings and efficiencies, we have entered into agreements with third-party service providers under which we have outsourced certain information systems, sales, finance, accounting, and other functions, and we may enter into managed services agreements with respect to other functions in the future. If any of these third-party service providers do not perform according to the terms of the agreements, or if we fail to adequately monitor their performance, we may not be able to achieve the expected cost savings or we may have to incur additional costs to correct errors made by such service providers, and our reputation could be harmed. Depending on the function involved, such errors may also lead to business interruption, damage or disruption of information technology systems, processing inefficiencies, the loss of or damage to intellectual property or non-public company sensitive information through security breaches or otherwise, effects on financial reporting, litigation or remediation costs, or damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, if we transition functions to one or more new, or among existing, external service providers, we may experience challenges that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our intellectual property rights, including our trademarks, licensing agreements, trade secrets, patents, and copyrights, are a significant and valuable aspect of our business. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights by pursuing remedies available to us under trademark, copyright, trade secret, and patent laws, as well as entering into licensing, third-party nondisclosure and assignment agreements and policing of third-party misuses of our intellectual property. If we fail to adequately protect the intellectual property rights we have now or may acquire in the future, or if there occurs any change in law or otherwise that serves to reduce or remove the current legal protections of our intellectual property, then our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

Certain of our intellectual property rights, including the P.F. Chang's®, Bertolli®, Del Monte®, and Libby's® trademarks, are owned by third parties and licensed to us, and others, such as Alexia®, are owned by us and licensed to third parties. While many of these licensing arrangements are perpetual in nature, others must be periodically renegotiated or renewed pursuant to the terms of such licensing arrangement. If in the future we are unable to renew such a licensing arrangement pursuant to its terms and conditions, or if we fail to renegotiate such a licensing arrangement, then our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

There is also a risk that other parties may have intellectual property rights covering some of our brands, products, or technology. If any third parties bring a claim of intellectual property infringement against us, we may be subject to costly and time-consuming litigation, diverting the attention of management and our employees. If we are unsuccessful in defending against such claims, we may be subject to, among other things, significant damages, injunctions against development and sale of certain products, or we may be required to enter into costly licensing agreements, any of which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.



Risks Relating

Our stock price may be subject to significant volatility, and you may not be able to resell shares of our common stock at or above the price you paid or at all, and you could lose all or part of your investment as a result.

The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including reasons not specifically related to our Spinoffperformance, such as industry or market trends, reports by industry analysts and other third parties, investor perceptions, actions by credit rating agencies, negative announcements by our customers or competitors regarding their own performance or actions taken by our competitors, as well as general economic and industry conditions. Our common stock price is also affected by announcements we make about our business, market data that is available to subscribers, analyst reports related to our Company, changes in financial estimates by analysts, whether or not we meet the financial estimates of Lamb Weston

We may be unable to achieve some or allanalysts who follow our Company, rating agency announcements about our business, variations in our quarterly results of operations and those of our competitors, general economic and stock market conditions, future sales of our common stock, perceptions of the benefits that we expectinvestment opportunity associated with our common stock relative to achieve fromother investment alternatives, the Spinoff.
Inpublic's reaction to our public announcements and filings with the second quarterSEC, actual or anticipated growth rates relative to our competitors, and speculation by the investment community regarding our business, among other factors.

As a result of fiscal 2017, the Company completed the announced Spinoff of Lamb Weston. Although we believe that separating the Lamb Weston business from the Company will provide financial, operational, managerial, and other benefits to us andthese factors, investors in our stockholders, the Spinoffcommon stock may not provide suchbe able to resell their shares at or above the price at which they purchase our common stock. In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies like us. These broad market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In addition, in the past, some companies that have had volatile market prices for their securities have been subject to class action or derivative lawsuits. The filing of a lawsuit against us, regardless of the outcome, could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results on the scope, scale, or timeline we anticipate,of operations, as it could result in substantial legal costs and wea diversion of management's attention and resources.


We may not realize the intendedgrowth opportunities and cost synergies that are anticipated from the acquisition of Pinnacle.

The benefits that are expected to result from the acquisition will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated growth opportunities and cost synergies as the result of the Spinoff. In addition, we incurred one-time costsacquisition. Our success in connection withrealizing these growth opportunities and cost synergies, and the Spinoff thattiming of this realization, depends on the successful integration of Pinnacle. There is a significant degree of difficulty and management distraction inherent in the process of integrating a company as sizable as Pinnacle. The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, our activities. Members of our senior management may negate somebe required to devote considerable amounts of time to this integration process, which will decrease the time they will have to manage the Company, service existing customers, attract new customers, and develop new products or strategies. If senior management is not able to effectively manage the integration process, or if any significant business activities are interrupted as a result of the benefitsintegration process, our business could suffer. There can be no assurance that we expectwill successfully or cost-effectively integrate Pinnacle. The failure to achieve. If we do not realize these assumed benefits, weso could sufferhave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition. In addition, our operationalcondition, and financial profile changed uponresults of operations.

Even if we are able to integrate Pinnacle successfully, this integration may not result in the separationrealization of the Lamb Weston businessfull benefits that are currently expected from this acquisition, and there can be no guarantee that these benefits will be achieved within the anticipated time frames or at all. For example, we may not be able to eliminate duplicative costs. Moreover, we may incur substantial expenses in connection with the integration of Pinnacle. While it is anticipated that certain expenses will be incurred to achieve cost synergies, such expenses are difficult to estimate accurately, and may exceed current estimates. Accordingly, the benefits from the Company. As a result, the diversification of our revenue sources diminished, and our results of operations, cash flows, working capital, and financing requirementsacquisition may be subjectoffset by costs incurred to, increased volatility as a result.

or delays in, integrating the business.

We may be exposed to claims and liabilities or incur operational difficulties as a result of the Spinoff.

The Spinoff continues to involve a number of risks, including, among other things, certain indemnification risks and risk associated with the provision of transitional services. In connection with the Spinoff, we entered into a separation and distribution agreement and various other agreements (including a transition services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, and a trademark license agreement), which we refer to as the Lamb Weston agreements. The Lamb Weston agreements govern the Spinoff and the relationship between the two companies going forward. They also provide for the performance of services by each company for the benefit of the other for a period of time.

The Lamb Weston agreements provide for indemnification obligations designed to make Lamb Weston financially responsible for certain liabilities that may exist relating to its business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the distribution, including any pending or future litigation. It is possible that a court would disregard the allocation agreed to between us and Lamb Weston and require us to assume responsibility for obligations allocated to Lamb Weston. Third parties could also seek to hold us responsible for any of these liabilities or obligations, and the indemnity rights we have under the separation and distribution agreement may not be sufficient to fully cover all of these liabilities and obligations. Even if we are successful in obtaining indemnification, we may have to bear costs temporarily. In addition, our indemnity obligations to Lamb Weston may be significant. These risks could negatively affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

In addition, certain of the Lamb Weston agreements provide for the performance of services by each company for the benefit of the other for a period of time. As such, there is continued risk that management's and our employees' attention will be significantly diverted by the provision of transitional services. The Lamb Weston agreements could also lead to disputes over rights to certain shared property and rights and over the allocation of costs and revenues for products and operations. If Lamb Weston is unable to satisfy its obligations under these agreements, including its indemnification obligations, we could incur losses. Our inability to effectively manage separation activities and related events could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

The Spinoff could result in substantial tax liability.
The Spinoff is intended to qualify for tax-free treatment to the Company and its stockholders under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code. Completion of the Spinoff was conditioned upon, among other things, our receipt of an opinion from our tax advisors that the distribution of shares of Lamb Weston in the Spinoff will qualify as tax-free to Lamb Weston, the Company, and our stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) and related provisions of the Code. The opinion relied on, among other things, various assumptions and representations as to factual matters made by the Company and Lamb Weston. If such assumptions or representations are inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect, the conclusions reached by such advisor in its opinion could be jeopardized. The opinion is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, or the courts, and there can be no assurance that the IRS or the courts will not challenge the qualification of the Spinoff as a transaction under Sections 355 and 368(a) of the Code or that any such challenge would not prevail.
If the Spinoff is determined to be taxable, the Company and its stockholders could incur significant tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.



Risks Relating to our Planned Acquisition of Pinnacle
Our planned acquisition of Pinnacle may not occur at all, may not occur in the expected time frame, or may involve the divestiture of certain businesses, which may negatively affect the trading prices of our stock and our future business and financial results.
On June 26, 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Pinnacle, pursuant to which, among other things and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of specified conditions, we will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock for cash and shares of Conagra Brands common stock. As a result of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle, Pinnacle shareholders are expected to own approximately 16% of the combined company.
Completion of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle is not assured and is subject to Pinnacle shareholder approval and the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions, including, among others: the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended; and the receipt of other required antitrust approvals.
The planned acquisition of Pinnacle is subject to risks and uncertainties, including the risks that the necessary shareholder and regulatory approvals will not be obtained, the risk that the parties to the merger agreement may be required to divest certain businesses or assets in connection with the planned acquisition or that other closing conditions will not be satisfied. For example, in connection with obtaining the required regulatory approvals, the Company and/or Pinnacle may be required to divest assets of their respective businesses, subject to certain limitations set forth in the merger agreement (including that the Company shall not be required to divest any assets or business of the Company or Pinnacle that, in the aggregate, generated net sales in excess of $300.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year). If the planned acquisition of Pinnacle is not completed, if there are significant delays in completing the planned acquisition or if the planned acquisition involves the divestiture of certain businesses, it could negatively affect the trading prices of our common stock and our future business and financial results and could result in our failure to realize certain synergies relating to such acquisition.
Our obligation to complete the planned acquisition of Pinnacle is not subject to a financing condition, and we may be required to finance a portion of the purchase price at interest rates higher than currently expected.
Our obligation to complete the planned acquisition of Pinnacle is not subject to a financing condition. We have obtained committed financing from Goldman Sachs Bank USA and Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, and expect to obtain permanent financing for the planned acquisition by accessing the capital markets, which may include the issuance of long-term debt and equity. If any of the banks in the committed financing facilities are unable to perform their commitments, we may be required to finance a portion of the purchase price of the planned acquisition at interest rates higher than currently expected.
We may not realize the growth opportunities and cost synergies that are anticipated from the planned acquisition of Pinnacle.
The benefits that are expected to result from the planned acquisition of Pinnacle will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated growth opportunities and $215 million in cost synergies as a result of the planned acquisition. Our success in realizing these growth opportunities and cost synergies, and the timing of this realization, depends on whether the Company or Pinnacle are required to divest assets of their respective business and on the successful integration of Pinnacle. There is a significant degree of difficulty and management distraction inherent in the process of integrating an acquisition as sizable as Pinnacle. The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, our and Pinnacle's activities. Members of our senior management may be required to devote considerable amounts of time to this integration process, which will decrease the time they will have to manage our company, service existing customers, attract new customers, and develop new products or strategies. If senior management is not able to effectively manage the integration process, or if any significant business activities are interrupted as a result of the integration process, our business could suffer. There can be no assurance that we will successfully or cost-effectively integrate Pinnacle. The failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Even if we are able to integrate Pinnacle successfully, this integration may not result in the realization of the full benefits of the growth opportunities and cost synergies that we currently expect from this integration, and we cannot guarantee that these benefits will be achieved within anticipated time frames or at all. For example, we may not be able to eliminate duplicative costs. Moreover, we may incur substantial expenses in connection with the integration of Pinnacle. While it is anticipated that certain expenses will be incurred to achieve cost synergies, such expenses are difficult to estimate accurately, and may exceed current estimates. Accordingly, the benefits from the planned acquisition may be offset by costs incurred to, or delays in, integrating the businesses.
We will incur a substantial amount of debt to complete the planned acquisition of Pinnacle. To service our debt, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control. We also depend on the business of our subsidiaries to satisfy our cash needs. If we cannot generate the required cash, we may not be able to make the necessary payments required under our indebtedness.
At May 27, 2018, we had total debt of approximately $3.8 billion. We have the ability under our existing credit facilities to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, and we plan to incur significant additional indebtedness if we complete the planned acquisition of Pinnacle. In connection with the acquisition, we expect to incur up to $8.3 billion of long-term debt, including for the payment of the cash portion of the merger consideration, the repayment of Pinnacle debt, the refinancing of certain Conagra debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses. Our ability to make payments on our debt, fund our other liquidity needs, and make planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our historical financial results have been, and we anticipate that our future financial results will be, subject to fluctuations. Our ability to generate cash, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot guarantee that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from our operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to make payments of our debt, fund other liquidity needs, and make planned capital expenditures.
The degree to which we are currently leveraged and will be leveraged following the completion of the planned acquisition could have important consequences for shareholders. For example, it could:
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions;
limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to enable us to react to changes in our business; or
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to businesses in our industry that have less debt.
Additionally, any failure to comply with covenants in the instruments governing our debt could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on us.
A significant portion of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow for our needs is dependent to some extent on the earnings of our subsidiaries and the payment of those earnings to us in the form of dividends, loans, or advances and through repayment of loans or advances from us. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities. Our subsidiaries have no obligation to pay any amounts due on our debt or to provide us with funds to meet our cash flow needs, whether in the form of dividends, distributions, loans, or other payments. In addition, any payment of dividends, loans, or advances by our subsidiaries could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. Payments to us by our subsidiaries will also be contingent upon our subsidiaries' earnings and business considerations. Our right to receive any assets of any of our subsidiaries upon their liquidation or reorganization will be effectively subordinated to the claims of that subsidiary's creditors, including trade creditors. In addition, even if we are a creditor of any of our subsidiaries, our rights as a creditor would be subordinate to any security interest in the assets of our subsidiaries and any indebtedness of our subsidiaries senior to that held by us. Finally, changes in the laws of foreign jurisdictions in which we operate may adversely affect the ability of some of our foreign subsidiaries to repatriate funds to us.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.




ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois. Other general offices, shared service centers, and a product development facilityfacilities are located in Omaha, Nebraska. We have general offices in Colorado,Nebraska and the District of Columbia, and Minnesota.Columbia. We also lease a limited number of domestic sales offices. International general offices are located in Canada, Colombia,China, Mexico, Panama, and the Philippines.


We maintain a number of stand-alone distribution facilities. In addition, there are warehouses at most of our manufacturing facilities.

Utilization of manufacturing capacity varies by manufacturing plant based upon the type of products assigned and the level of demand for those products. Management believes that our manufacturing and processing plants are well maintained and are generally adequate to support the current operations of the business.

As of July 20, 2018,24, 2020, we have thirty-threehad forty-one domestic manufacturing facilities located in Arkansas, California, Georgia,Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Washington, and Wisconsin. We also have international manufacturing facilities in Canada Italy, and Mexico, and interests in ownership of international manufacturing facilities in India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Mexico.

We own most of our manufacturing facilities. However, a limited number of plants and parcels of land with the related manufacturing equipment are leased. Substantially all of our transportation equipment and forward-positioned distribution centers containing finished goods are leased or operated by third parties.

The majority of our manufacturing assets are shared across multiple reporting segments. Output from these facilities used by each reporting segment can change over time. Therefore, it is impracticable to disclose them by segment.



Litigation Matters


We are a party to certain litigation matters relating to our acquisition of Beatrice Company ("Beatrice") in fiscal 1991, including litigation proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to our acquisition of the company. These proceedings includehave included suits against a number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("ConAgra Grocery Products") as alleged successor to W. P. Fuller & Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by a predecessor to Beatrice from 1962 until 1967. These lawsuits generally seek damages for personal injury, property damage, economic loss, and governmental expenditures allegedly caused by the use of lead-based paint, and/or injunctive relief for inspection and abatement. Although decisions favorable to usWhen such lawsuits have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California.brought, ConAgra Grocery Products has denied liability, in both suits, both on the merits of the claims and on the basis that we do not believe it to be the successor to any liability attributable to W. P. Fuller & Co. TheDecisions favorable to us were rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio. ConAgra Grocery Products was held liable for the abatement of a public nuisance in California, suit isand the case was dismissed pursuant to settlement in July 2019 as discussed in the following paragraph. We remain a defendant in one active suit in Illinois. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief for reimbursement of costs associated with the testing of lead levels in blood. We do not believe it is probable that we have incurred any liability with respect to the Illinois case, nor is it possible to estimate any potential exposure.

In California, a number of cities and counties joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of an alleged public nuisance in the form of lead-based paint potentially present on the interior of residences, regardless of its condition. On September 23, 2013, a trial of the California case concluded in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara, and on January 27, 2014, the court entered a judgment (the "Judgment") against ConAgra Grocery Products and two other defendants ordering the creation of a California abatement fund in the amount of $1.15 billion. Liability iswas joint and several. The Company appealed the Judgment, and on November 14, 2017 the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District reversed in part, holding that the defendants were not liable to pay for abatement of homes built after 1950, but affirmed the Judgment as to homes built before 1951. The Court of Appeal remanded the case to the trial court with directions to recalculate the amount of the abatement fund estimated to be necessary to cover the cost of remediating pre-1951 homes, and to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding appointment of a suitable receiver. ConAgra Grocery Products and the other defendants petitioned the California Supreme Court for review of the decision, which we believe to be an unprecedented expansion of current California law. On February 14, 2018, the California Supreme Court denied the petition and declined to review the merits of the case, and the case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. ConAgra Grocery Products and the other defendants have indicated that they will seeksought further review of certain issues from the Supreme Court of the



United States, although further appeal is discretionary and may not be granted. Further proceedings inbut on October 15, 2018, the Supreme Court declined to review the case. On September 4, 2018, the trial court may not be stayed pending the outcome of any further appeal. In light of the decision rendered by the California Appellate Court on November 14, 2017, and the California Supreme Court's decision on February 14, 2018 not to review the Appellate Court's decision, we have concluded that the liability has likely become probable as contemplated by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 450, however many uncertainties remain which make it difficult to estimate the potential liability, including the following: (i) the trial court has not yet recalculated its estimate of the amount needed to remediate pre-1951 homes in the plaintiff jurisdictions or entered a new judgment to replacebe $409.0 million. As of July 10, 2019, the one vacated by the California Appellate Court; (ii) although liability is joint and several, it is unknown what amount each defendant may ultimately be requiredparties reached an agreement in principle to pay or how allocation among the defendants (and other potentially responsible parties such as property owners who may have violated the applicable housing codes) will be determined; (iii) according to the trial court's original order, participation in the abatement program by eligible homeowners is voluntary and it is unknown what percentage of eligible homeowners will choose to participate or how such claims will be administered; (iv) the trial court's original order required that any amounts paid by the defendants into the fund that were not spent within four years would be returned to the defendants, and it is unknown whetherresolve this feature of the fund will be retained or, if it is retained, how much will be spent during that time period; and (v) defendants will have a new right to appeal any new aspects of the judgment enteredmatter, which agreement was approved by the trial court upon remand, although it is unknown whetheron July 24, 2019, and the court would stay execution of any new judgment while a subsequent appeal is pending.

To assist the trial court in satisfying its responsibilities, during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the defendants and plaintiff each submitted informationaction against ConAgra Grocery Products was dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to the court regarding recalculationsettlement, ConAgra Grocery Products will pay a total of $101.7 million in seven installments to be paid annually from fiscal 2020 through fiscal 2026. As part of the abatement fund. In addition, onesettlement, ConAgra Grocery Products has provided a guarantee of up to $15.0 million in the defendants entered into a proposed settlement with the plaintiff, contingent upon a judicial good faith determination under California law. event co-defendant, NL Industries, Inc., defaults on its payment obligations.


We are uncertain as to when the court will make a ruling on a recalculated abatement fund or the proposed settlement. Notwithstanding the uncertainties described above, this additional information was used by the Company in concluding that a loss is now reasonably estimable. While the ultimate amount of any loss and timing of payments related thereto remain uncertain and could change as further information is obtained, we believe that our share of the loss could range from $60 million to $335have accrued $11.5 million and have recorded a liability$63.1 million, within other accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities, respectively, for the amount in that range that we believe is a better estimate than the low or high endsthis matter as of the range.May 31, 2020. The extent of insurance coverage is uncertain, and the Company's carriers are on notice; however, any possible insurance recovery has not been considered for purposes of determining our liability. The CompanyWe cannot assure that the final resolution of thesethe lead paint and pigment matters will not have a material adverse effect on itsour financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim® branded meat snacks. In June 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release and not a deliberate act. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we settled our property and business interruption claims related to the Garner accident with our insurance providers. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ("Jacobs"), our engineer and project manager at the site, filed a declaratory judgment action against us seeking indemnity for personal injury claims brought against it as a result of the accident. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our motion for summary judgment was granted and the suit was dismissed without prejudice on the basis that the suit was filed prematurely. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, Jacobs refiled its action seeking indemnity. On March 25, 2016, a Douglas County jury in Nebraska rendered a verdict in favor of Jacobs and against us in the amount of $108.9 million plus post-judgment interest. We filed our Notice of Appeal in September 2016, the appeal was heard by the Nebraska Supreme Court in November 2017, and the case is awaiting decision by the Nebraska Supreme Court. The appeal will be decided directly by the Nebraska Supreme Court. Although our insurance carriers have provided customary notices of reservation of their rights under the policies of insurance, we expect any ultimate exposure in this case to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible.

We are party to a number of putative class action lawsuits challenging various product claims made in the Company's product labeling. These matters include Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., in which it is alleged that the labeling for Wesson® oils as 100% natural is false and misleading because the oils contain genetically modified plants and organisms. In February 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted class certification to permit plaintiffs to pursue state law claims. The Company appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed class certification in January 2017. The Supreme Court of the United States declined to review the decision and the case has beenwas remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. While we cannot predict with certaintyOn April 4, 2019, the resultstrial court granted preliminary approval of a settlement in this or any other legal proceeding, we domatter. In the second quarter of fiscal 2020, a single objecting class member appealed the court's decision approving the settlement to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The settlement will not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.

be final until the appeal has been resolved.

We are party to matters challenging the Company's wage and hour practices. These matters include a number of putative class actions consolidated under the caption Negrete v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., et al, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, in which the plaintiffs allege a pattern of violations of California and/or federal law at several



current and former Company manufacturing facilities across the State of California. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of this or any other legal proceeding, we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.
In

We are party to a number of matters asserting product liability claims against the fourthCompany related to certain Pam® and other cooking spray products. These lawsuits generally seek damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by defects in the design, manufacture, or safety warnings of the cooking spray products. We have put the Company's insurance carriers on notice. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of these or any other legal proceedings, we do not expect these matters to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.

The Company, its directors, and several of its executive officers are defendants in several class actions alleging violations of federal securities laws. The lawsuits assert that the Company's officers made material misstatements and omissions that caused the market to have an unrealistically positive assessment of the Company's financial prospects in light of the acquisition of Pinnacle, thus causing the Company's securities to be overvalued prior to the release of the Company's consolidated financial results on December 20, 2018 for the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we accrued $151.0 millionyear 2019. The first of these lawsuits, captioned West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. Conagra Brands, Inc., et al., with which subsequent lawsuits alleging similar facts have been consolidated, was filed on February 22, 2019 in new legal reserves relatingthe U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In addition, on May 9, 2019, a shareholder filed a derivative action on behalf of the Company against the Company's directors captioned Klein v. Arora, et al. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois asserting harm to the Company due to alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and mismanagement in connection with the Pinnacle acquisition. On July 9, 2019, September 20, 2019, and March 10, 2020, the Company received three separate demands from stockholders under Delaware law to inspect the Company's books and records related to the Board of Directors' review of the Pinnacle business, acquisition, and the Company's public statements related to them. On July 22, 2019 and August 6, 2019, respectively, two additional shareholder derivative lawsuits captioned Opperman v. Connolly, et al. and Dahl v. Connolly, et al. were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois asserting similar facts and claims as the Klein v. Arora, et al. matter. On October 21, 2019, the Company received an additional demand from a stockholder under Delaware law to appoint a special committee to investigate the conduct of certain officers and directors in connection with the Pinnacle acquisition and the Company's public statements. We have put the Company's insurance carriers on notice of each of these securities and shareholder matters. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of these or any other legal proceedings, we do not expect these matters set forth above.

to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.

Environmental Matters

We are a party to certain environmental proceedings relating to our acquisition of Beatrice in fiscal 1991. Such proceedings include proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to our acquisition of Beatrice. The current environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's possible status as a potentially responsible party at approximately 40 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites (the "Beatrice sites"). These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum,


pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs,polycholorinated biphenyls, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. In the past five years, Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 31 of these sites. Reserves for these Beatrice environmental proceedings have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The accrual for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled $52.4$57.7 million as of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, a final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study was submitted for the Southwest Properties portion ("Operating Unit 4") of the Wells G&H Superfund site, which is one of the Beatrice sites. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"("EPA") issued a Record of Decision (the "ROD"("ROD") for the Southwest Properties portion of the site on September 29, 2017 and has entered into negotiations with potentially responsible parties to determine final responsibility for implementing the ROD.

Additionally, in conjunction with the conclusion of the fifth Five-Year Review period for Operating Unit 1 of the Wells G&H site, which spanned from October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2019, we are negotiating with the EPA to allow us to begin testing different environmental remediation methods to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our current cleanup efforts affecting both Operating Units 1 and 2. As a result, in the second quarter of fiscal 2020, we increased our environmental reserves by $6.6 million associated with these expected cleanup efforts.

General Matters

After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity; however, it is reasonably possible that a change of the estimates of any of the foregoing matters may occur in the future and, as noted, the lead paint matterwhich could result inhave a material final judgment.


adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

Costs of legal services associated with the foregoing matters are recognized in earnings as services are provided.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, where it trades under the ticker symbol: CAG. At June 24, 2018,28, 2020, there were approximately 16,85415,508 shareholders of record.

Quarterly sales price and dividend information is set forth in Note 22 "Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)" to the consolidated financial statements and incorporated herein by reference.


Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table presents the total number of

No shares of common stock were purchased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased as part of a publicly announced repurchase program, and the approximate dollar value of the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the share repurchase program:

Period
Total Number
of Shares (or
units)
Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or unit)
 
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs (1)
 
Approximate Dollar
Value of Maximum
Number of Shares that
may yet be Purchased
under the Program (1)
February 26 through March 25, 2018
 $
 
 $521,968,000
March 26 through April 22, 20181,680,824
 $37.10
 1,680,824
 $459,599,000
April 23 through May 27, 20181,217,467
 $36.88
 1,217,467
 $1,414,700,000
Total Fiscal 2018 Fourth Quarter Activity2,898,291
 $37.00
 2,898,291
 $1,414,700,000

(1)
Pursuant to publicly announced share repurchase programs from December 2003, we have repurchased approximately 220.6 million shares at a cost of $6.14 billion through May 27, 2018. On October 11, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an increase of $1.25 billion to the share repurchase program. We announced that our Board of Directors approved further increases to the share repurchase program of $1.0 billion each on June 29, 2017 and June 27, 2018, respectively. The share repurchase program is effective and has no expiration date.

2020.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

For the Fiscal Years Ended May

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Dollars in millions, except per share amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales (1)

 

$

11,054.4

 

 

$

9,538.4

 

 

$

7,938.3

 

 

$

7,826.9

 

 

$

8,664.1

 

Income from continuing operations (1)

 

$

841.8

 

 

$

680.3

 

 

$

797.5

 

 

$

546.0

 

 

$

128.5

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. (2)

 

$

840.1

 

 

$

678.3

 

 

$

808.4

 

 

$

639.3

 

 

$

(677.0

)

Basic earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations attributable to

   Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (1)

 

$

1.72

 

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

1.97

 

 

$

1.26

 

 

$

0.29

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

   common stockholders (2)

 

$

1.72

 

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

2.00

 

 

$

1.48

 

 

$

(1.57

)

Diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations attributable to

   Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (1)

 

$

1.72

 

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

1.95

 

 

$

1.25

 

 

$

0.29

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

   common stockholders (2)

 

$

1.72

 

 

$

1.52

 

 

$

1.98

 

 

$

1.46

 

 

$

(1.56

)

Cash dividends declared per share of common stock

 

$

0.85

 

 

$

0.85

 

 

$

0.85

 

 

$

0.90

 

 

$

1.00

 

At Year-End

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

22,304.0

 

 

$

22,213.8

 

 

$

10,389.5

 

 

$

10,096.3

 

 

$

13,390.6

 

Senior long-term debt (noncurrent) (1)

 

$

8,900.8

 

 

$

10,459.8

 

 

$

3,035.6

 

 

$

2,573.3

 

 

$

4,685.5

 

Subordinated long-term debt (noncurrent)

 

$

 

 

$

195.9

 

 

$

195.9

 

 

$

195.9

 

 

$

195.9

 

For the Fiscal Years Ended May 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Dollars in millions, except per share amounts          
Net sales (1)
 $7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 $8,664.1
 $9,034.0
 $9,041.7
Income from continuing operations (1)
 $797.5
 $546.0
 $128.5
 $451.3
 $325.4
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. (2)
 $808.4
 $639.3
 $(677.0) $(252.6) $303.1
Basic earnings per share:          
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (1)
 $1.97
 $1.26
 $0.29
 $1.05
 $0.77
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (2)
 $2.00
 $1.48
 $(1.57) $(0.60) $0.72
Diluted earnings per share:          
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (1)
 $1.95
 $1.25
 $0.29
 $1.04
 $0.76
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (2)
 $1.98
 $1.46
 $(1.56) $(0.59) $0.70
Cash dividends declared per share of common stock $0.85
 $0.90
 $1.00
 $1.00
 $1.00
At Year-End          
Total assets $10,389.5
 $10,096.3
 $13,390.6
 $17,437.8
 $19,241.5
Senior long-term debt (noncurrent) (1)
 $3,035.6
 $2,573.3
 $4,685.5
 $6,676.0
 $8,507.0
Subordinated long-term debt (noncurrent) $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9

(1)

Amounts exclude the impact of discontinued operations of the Lightlife® operations, the Medallion Foods operations, the ConAgra Mills operations, the Private Brands operations, and the Lamb Weston operations.

(2)

Amounts include aggregate pre-tax goodwill and certain long-lived asset impairment charges in discontinued operations of $1.92 billion $1.56 billion, and $596.2 million for fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.2016.





ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide a summary of significant factors relevant to our financial performance and condition. The discussion and analysis should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Results for the fiscal year ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the future.


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained in this report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding our expected future financial performance or position, results of operations, business strategy, plans and objectives of management for future operations, and other statements that are not historical facts. You can identify forward-looking statements by their use of forward-looking words, such as "may", "will", "anticipate", "expect", "believe", "estimate", "intend", "plan", "should", "seek", or comparable terms.

Readers of this report should understand that these forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and factors relating to our business and operations, all of which are difficult to predict and could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. SuchThese risks, uncertainties, and factors include, among other things: the failure to obtain Pinnacle Foods Inc. ("Pinnacle") shareholder approval of the merger agreement; the possibility that the closing conditions to the planned acquisition of Pinnacle may not be satisfied or waived, including that a governmental entity may prohibit, delay, or refuse to grant a necessary regulatory approval and any conditions imposed on the combined entity in connection with consummation of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle; delay in closing the planned acquisition of Pinnacle or the possibility of non-consummation of the planned acquisition; the risk that the cost savings and any other synergies from the planned acquisition of Pinnacle Foods Inc. (the "Pinnacle acquisition") may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected, includingexpected; the risk that the plannedPinnacle acquisition may not be accretive within the expected timeframe or to the extent anticipated; the occurrencerisks that the Pinnacle acquisition and related integration will create disruption to the Company and its management and impede the achievement of any event that could give rise to termination of the merger agreement;business plans; the risk that shareholder litigation in connection with the plannedPinnacle acquisition of Pinnacle may affectwill negatively impact the timing or occurrence of the planned acquisition or result in significant costs of defense, indemnification, and liability; risks related to the disruption of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle to us and our management; the effect of the announcement of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle on our ability to retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, and other third parties; risks related to our ability to successfully address Pinnacle's business challenges; risks related to our ability to achieve the intended benefits of other recent and pending acquisitions and divestitures, including the recent spin-off of our Lamb Weston business; the continued evaluation of the role of our Wesson® oil business;divestitures; risks associated with general economic and industry conditions; risks associated with our ability to successfully execute our long-term value creation strategy;strategies, including those in place for specific brands at Pinnacle before the Pinnacle acquisition; risks related to our ability to deleverage on currently anticipated timelines, and to continue to access capital on acceptable terms or at all; risks related to our ability to execute our operating and restructuring plans and achieve our targeted operating efficiencies from cost-saving initiatives, related to the Pinnacle acquisition and otherwise, and to benefit from trade optimization programs;programs, related to the Pinnacle acquisition and otherwise; risks related to the effectiveness of our hedging activities and our ability to respond to volatility in commodities; risks related to the Company's competitive environment and related market conditions; risks related to our ability to respond to changing consumer preferences and the success of ourits innovation and marketing investments; risks related to the ultimate impact of any product recalls and litigation, including litigation related to the lead paint and pigment matters;matters, as well as any securities litigation, including securities class action lawsuits; risk associated with actions of governments and regulatory factors affectingbodies that affect our businesses, including the ultimate impact of recently enacted U.S. tax legislation and relatednew or revised regulations or interpretations; risks related to the impact of the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on our business, suppliers, consumers, customers and employees; risks related to the availability and prices of raw materials, including any negative effects caused by inflation, weather conditions, or weather conditions;health pandemics; disruptions or inefficiencies in our supply chain and/or operations, including from the recent COVID-19 pandemic; risks and uncertainties associated with intangible assets, including any future goodwill or intangible assets impairment charges;charges, related to the Pinnacle acquisition or otherwise; the costs, disruption, and diversion of management's attention due to the integration of the Pinnacle acquisition; and other risks described in our reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). We caution readers not to place undue reliance on theseany forward-looking statements included in this report, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no responsibility to update these statements, except as required by law.

The discussion that follows should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this report. Results for fiscal 20182020 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the future.



EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Conagra Brands, Inc. (the "Company", "Conagra Brands", "we", "us", or "our"), headquartered in Chicago, is one of North America's leading branded food companies. Guided by an entrepreneurial spirit, the Company combines a rich heritage of making great food with a sharpened focus on innovation. The Company's portfolio is evolving to satisfy people's changing food preferences. Its iconic brands such as Birds Eye®, Marie Callender's®, Reddi-wipBanquet®, Hunt'sHealthy Choice®, Healthy ChoiceSlim Jim®, Slim JimReddi-wip®, Orville Redenbacher'sand


Vlasic®, as well as emerging brands, including AlexiaAngie's®, Angie's BOOMCHICKAPOP® BOOMCHICKAPOP, Duke's®, Blake'sEarth Balance®, Duke'sGardein®, and Frontera®, offer choices for every occasion.

Fiscal 2019 Pinnacle Acquisition

On October 26, 2018, we completed our acquisition of Pinnacle Foods Inc ("Pinnacle"), a branded packaged foods company specializing in shelf-stable and frozen foods. The total amount of consideration paid in connection with the acquisition was approximately $8.03 billion, consisting of cash and shares of our stock, as described in more detail in the section entitled "Acquisitions" below.

In connection with the Pinnacle acquisition, we issued approximately $8.33 billion of long-term debt and received cash proceeds of $575.0 million ($555.7 million net of related fees) from the issuance of common stock in an underwritten public offering. We used such proceeds for the payment of the cash portion of the Merger Consideration (as defined below), the repayment of Pinnacle debt acquired, the refinancing of certain Conagra Brands debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses.

The integration of Pinnacle is continuing and on-track. We expect to achieve cost synergies of $305 million per year when the integration is concluded.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2020, we reorganized our reporting segments to incorporate the Pinnacle operations into our legacy reporting segments in order to better reflect how the business is now being managed. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation.

Fiscal 2020 Results

Fiscal 2020 performance compared to fiscal 20172019 reflected improvingan increase in net sales, trends, due to innovationincluding the impact of recent acquisitions, with organic (excludes the impacts of foreign exchange, divested businesses and renovationacquisitions, including the Pinnacle acquisition (until the anniversary date of somethe acquisitions), as well as the impact of the 53rd week of our largest brands and enhanced marketing methods. Higher gross profitsfiscal year) increases in all of our operating segments with the International andexception of our Foodservice segment, in each case compared to fiscal 2019. Organic net sales for our retail segments were offset by slightly lower gross profits in the(inclusive of Grocery & Snacks, and Refrigerated & Frozen, segments. Despiteand International) were positively impacted by the increase in at-home food consumption as a challenging inflationary environment, we achieved significantly improvedresult of the COVID-19 pandemic, with sales declines in our Foodservice segment due to lower traffic in away-from-home food outlets.

Overall gross margin increased with the addition of Pinnacle's gross profit, organic net sales growth, supply chain realized productivity, cost synergies, and the inclusion of the 53rd week of our fiscal year. These benefits were partially offset by higher input and transportation costs, lost profits due to divested businesses, pandemic-related costs, and the impact of foreign exchange rates. Overall segment operating profit increased in all of our operating segments with the exception of our Foodservice segment. Corporate expenses decreased due to items impacting comparability, as discussed below. We experienced a slight decrease in equity method investment earnings, a decrease in fiscal 2018. The improved operating performance reflected significantly lower selling, generalincome tax expense, and administrative ("SG&A") expenses and loweran increase in interest expense, in each case compared to fiscal 2017.

On December 22, 2017, the 2017 U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") was signed into law. The Tax Act reduces tax rates and modifies certain policies, credits, and deductions and has certain international tax consequences. The Tax Act reduces the federal corporate tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate. The Tax Act's corporate rate reduction became effective January 1, 2018, in the middle of our third quarter. Given our off-calendar fiscal year-end, our fiscal 2018 federal statutory tax rate was a blended rate. Our federal statutory rate will reduce to 21% in fiscal 2019. As a result, we were required to revalue our deferred tax assets and liabilities to account for the future impact of lower corporate tax rates and other provisions of the Tax Act. These changes resulted in a one-time estimated income tax benefit of $233.3 million for fiscal 2018. This amount may be adjusted in the future as further information and interpretations become available.

Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 20182020 were $1.98,$1.72. Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2019 were $1.52, including earnings of $1.95$1.53 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.03a loss of $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Diluted earnings per share were affected by higher net income, partially offset by an increase in fiscal 2017 were $1.46, including earningsthe number of $1.25 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.21 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Severalshares as well as several significant items affectaffecting the comparability of year-over-year results of continuing operations (see "Items Impacting Comparability" below).

On June 26, 2018, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement (the "Merger Agreement") with Pinnacle and Patriot Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of us ("Merger Sub"). The Merger Agreement provides for, among other things, the merger of Merger Sub with and into Pinnacle, with Pinnacle continuing as the surviving corporation. As a result of the merger, Merger Sub will cease to exist, and Pinnacle will survive as our wholly-owned subsidiary.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the merger, each share of Pinnacle common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares as to which dissenter's rights have been properly exercised and certain other excluded shares) will be converted into the right to receive (i) $43.11 in cash and (ii) 0.6494 shares of our common stock, with cash payable in lieu of fractional shares of our common stock. The implied price of $68.00 per Pinnacle share is based on the volume-weighted average price of our stock for the five days ended June 21, 2018.
We have secured $9.0 billion in fully committed bridge financing from affiliates of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in connection with the planned acquisition of Pinnacle. The commitments under the committed bridge financing were subsequently reduced by the amounts of a term loan agreement we entered into on July 11, 2018 with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for term loans to us in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.3 billion. The funding under the term loan agreement is anticipated to occur simultaneously with the closing date of the acquisition. In connection with the merger, we expect to incur up to $8.3 billion of long-term debt (which includes any funding under the new term loan agreement), including for the payment of the cash portion of the merger consideration, the repayment of Pinnacle debt, the refinancing of certain Conagra debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses. The permanent financing is also expected to include approximately $600 million of incremental cash proceeds from the issuance of equity and/or divestitures.
The planned acquisition of Pinnacle is expected to close by the end of calendar 2018 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including (i) the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of all outstanding Pinnacle common stock, (ii) there being no law or order that restrains, enjoins, or otherwise prohibits the consummation of the planned acquisition or the issuance of our common stock in connection with the planned acquisition, and (iii) the expiration of the waiting period applicable to the planned acquisition under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust


Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and receipt of other required antitrust approvals. The obligation of each of us and Pinnacle to consummate the planned acquisition is also conditioned on the other party's representations and warranties being true and correct (subject to certain materiality exceptions) and the other party having performed, in all material respects, its obligations under the Merger Agreement. The closing of the planned acquisition is not subject to a financing condition.

Items Impacting Comparability

Items of note impacting comparability of results from continuing operations for fiscal 20182020 included the following:

an income tax benefit of $233.3 million related to the enactment of the Tax Act,
charges totaling $151.0 million ($113.3 million after-tax) related to certain litigation matters,

charges totaling $165.5 million ($127.0 million after-tax) related to the impairment of intangible assets,


charges totaling $139.5 million ($106.8 million after-tax) in connection with our restructuring plans,

charges totaling $59.0 million ($55.0 million after-tax) related to the impairment of businesses held for sale,

an income tax expensebenefit of $78.6$51.2 million associated primarily related to the reorganization of various legacy Pinnacle legal entities and state tax planning strategies,

charges totaling $42.9 million ($32.1 million after-tax) related to pension plan lump-sum settlements and a remeasurement of our hourly and non-qualified pension plan liability,

a gain of $11.9 million ($8.9 million after-tax) related to a contract settlement,

charges totaling $10.1 million ($7.6 million after-tax) related to legal and environmental matters, and

charges totaling $5.3 million ($3.9 million after-tax) associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and divestitures.

Items of note impacting comparability of results from continuing operations for fiscal 2019 included the following:

charges totaling $180.8 million ($138.9 million after-tax) in connection with our restructuring plans,

charges totaling $118.1 million ($94.8 million after-tax) associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and divestitures,

charges totaling $89.6 million ($66.9 million after-tax and net of non-controlling interest) related to the impairment of other intangible assets,

gains of $69.4 million ($35.1 million after-tax) from the sales of the Del Monte®Canada business, the Wesson® oil business, and the Gelit pasta business,

incremental cost of goods sold of $53.0 million ($39.5 million after-tax) due to the fair value adjustment to inventory resulting from acquisition accounting for the Pinnacle acquisition,

a gain of $39.1 million ($29.1 million after-tax) related to legal matters,

an income tax benefit of $32.4 million associated with a change in a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset due to the terminationdivestitures of the agreement forWesson® oil business and the proposedGelit pasta business,

a gain of $27.3 million ($27.3 million after-tax) related to the novation of a legacy guarantee,

a gain of $15.1 million ($12.2 million after-tax) related to the fair value adjustment of cash settleable equity awards issued in connection with, and included in the acquisition consideration of, the Pinnacle acquisition,

a gain of $15.1 million ($11.6 million after-tax) related to the sale of our Wesson® oil business,an asset within the Ardent Mills joint venture,

an income tax charge of $42.1 million associated with unusual tax items related to the repatriation of cash during the second quarter from foreign subsidiaries, the tax expense related to the earnings of foreign subsidiaries previously deemed to be permanently invested, a pension contribution, and the effect of a law change in Mexico requiring deconsolidation for tax reporting purposes,
charges totaling $34.9 million ($25.6 million after-tax) related to the early termination of an unfavorable lease contract by purchasing the property subject to the lease,
charges totaling $38.0 million ($27.0 million after-tax) in connection with our SCAE Plan (as defined below),
charges totaling $15.7 million ($10.9 million after-tax) associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and divestitures,
charges totaling $5.4 million ($3.7 million after-tax) related to pension plan lump-sum settlements and a remeasurement of our salaried and non-qualified pension plan liability,
charges totaling $4.8 million ($3.7 million after-tax) related to the impairment of other intangible assets, and
a benefit of $4.3 million ($2.9 million after-tax) related to the substantial liquidation of an international joint venture (recorded in equity method investment earnings).
Items of note impacting comparability of results from continuing operations for fiscal 2017 included the following:
charges totaling $304.2 million ($257.7 million after-tax) related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets,
gains totaling $197.4 million ($68.4 million after-tax) from the sales of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,
charges totaling $93.3 million ($60.2 million after-tax) related to the early retirement of debt,

an income tax benefitcharge of $91.3$10.4 million associated with unusual tax items primarily related to a tax adjustment of valuation allowancelegal entity restructuring activity,

charges totaling $8.9 million ($6.6 million after-tax) associated with the planned divestiture of the Wesson® oil business,

charges totaling $63.6 million ($41.4 million after-tax) in connection with the SCAE Plan,
charges totaling $31.4 million ($19.6 million after-tax), including an impairment charge of $27.6 millioncosts incurred for integration activities related to the production assetsPinnacle acquisition, and

charges totaling $4.3 million ($3.2 million after-tax) related to pension plan lump-sum settlements and a remeasurement of the business, for the planned divestiture of the Wesson® oil business,our salaried and non-qualified pension plan liability.

an income tax benefit

In addition, fiscal 2020 earnings per share benefited by approximately $0.05 as a result of $14.6 million associated with a tax planning strategy that allowed us to utilize certain state tax attributes and certain foreign incentives,

charges totaling $13.8 million ($8.5 million after-tax) related to a pension lump sum settlement, and
a gain of $5.7 million ($3.7 million after-tax) in connection with a legacy legal matter.


the fiscal year including 53 weeks.

Segment presentation of gains and losses from derivatives used for economic hedging of anticipated commodity input costs and economic hedging of foreign currency exchange rate risks of anticipated transactions isare discussed in the segment review below.

Acquisitions

As noted above, on

On October 26, 2018, we completed the Pinnacle acquisition. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 26, 2018 subsequent(the "Merger Agreement"), among the Company, Pinnacle, and Patriot Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that ceased to exist at the endeffective time of fiscal 2018, we entered into the Merger Agreement with Pinnacle under which we will acquire allmerger, each outstanding sharesshare of Pinnacle common stock in a cash and stock transaction valued at approximately $10.9 billion, including Pinnacle's outstanding net debt. Underwas converted into the terms of the Merger Agreement, Pinnacle shareholders willright to receive $43.11 per share in cash and 0.6494 shares of our common stock, for eachpar value $5.00 per share, of Pinnacle common stock held.the


Company ("Company Shares") (together, the "Merger Consideration"), with cash payable in lieu of fractional shares of Company Shares. The plannedtotal amount of consideration paid in connection with the acquisition is expectedwas approximately $8.03 billion and consisted of: (1) cash of $5.17 billion ($5.12 billion, net of cash acquired); (2) 77.5 million Company Shares, with an approximate value of $2.82 billion, issued out of the Company's treasury to close by the end of calendar 2018 and remains subject to the approvalformer holders of Pinnacle shareholders,stock; and (3) replacement awards issued to former Pinnacle employees representing the receiptfair value attributable to pre-combination service of regulatory approvals,$51.1 million. Approximately $7.03 billion of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and approximately $3.52 billion was allocated to brands, trademarks and other customary closing conditions.

intangibles. Of the total goodwill, $236.7 million is deductible for tax purposes. Amortizable brands, trademarks and other intangibles totaled $668.7 million. Indefinite lived brands, trademarks and other intangibles totaled $2.85 billion.

In February 2018, we acquired the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business, maker of frozen breakfast and entree flatbread pocket sandwiches, for a cash purchase price of $87.3 million, net of cash acquired. Approximately $57.8 million has been classified as goodwill, subject to final purchase price allocation, and $9.7 million and $7.1 million have been classified as non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The amount of goodwill allocated is deductible for tax purposes. The business is included in the Refrigerated & Frozen segment.

In October 2017, we acquired Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, maker of Angie's®BOOMCHICKAPOP® ready-to-eat popcorn, for a cash purchase price of $249.8 million, net of cash acquired. Approximately $155.2$156.7 million has been classified as goodwill, subject to final purchase price allocation, of which $95.4 million is deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $73.8 million and $10.3 million of the purchase price have been allocated to non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The business is primarily included in the Grocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent in the International segment.

In April 2017,

Divestitures

During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, we acquired protein-based snacking businesses Thanasi Foods LLC, makercompleted the sale of Duke’sour Lender's® meat bagel business for net proceeds of $33.2 million, subject to final working capital adjustments. The results of operations of the divested Lender’s®bagel business were primarily included in our Refrigerated & Frozen segment, and to a lesser extent within our Foodservice segment for the periods preceding the completion of the transaction. The assets and liabilities of this business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented prior to the divestiture.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2020, we completed the sale of our Direct Store Delivery ("DSD") snacks business, for net proceeds of $137.5 million, including final working capital adjustments. The results of operations of the divested DSD snacks business were included in our Grocery & Snacks segment for the periods preceding the completion of the transaction. The assets and BIGS LLC, makerliabilities of BIGS® seeds,this business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for $217.6 million in cash,sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented prior to the divestiture.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, we completed the sale of our Italian-based frozen pasta business, Gelit, for proceeds net of cash acquired (the "Thanasi acquisition"). Approximately $133.3divested of $80.1 million, has been classified as goodwill,including final working capital adjustments. The results of which $70.5 million is deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $65.1 million and $16.1 millionoperations of the purchase price have been allocated to non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. These businesses aredivested Gelit business were primarily included in our Refrigerated & Frozen segment for the Grocery & Snacks segment.

In September 2016,periods preceding the completion of the transaction.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, we acquiredalso completed the operating assetssale of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC, including the Fronteraour Wesson®, Red Fork oil business for net proceeds of $168.3 million, including final working capital adjustments. The results of operations of the divested Wesson®, and Salpica® brands (the "Frontera acquisition"). These businesses make authentic, gourmet Mexican food products and contemporary American cooking sauces. We acquired the businesses for $108.1 million oil business were primarily included in cash, net of cash acquired. Approximately $39.5 million has been classified as goodwill and $59.5 million and $7.2 million have been classified as non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. These businesses are included primarily in theour Grocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent within the Refrigerated & FrozenFoodservice and International segments.

Divestitures
segments, for the periods preceding the completion of the transaction.

During the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2018,2019, we signed a definitive agreement to sellcompleted the sale of our Del Monte®processedfruit and vegetable business in Canada which is partfor combined proceeds of our International segment. The transaction was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, and was valued at approximately $43.0 million Canadian dollars, which was approximately $34.0 million U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the date of announcement.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we signed an agreement to sell our Wesson® oil business, which is part of our Grocery & Snacks segment, to The J.M. Smucker Company ("Smucker"). In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Conagra Brands and Smucker terminated the agreement. This outcome followed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission, announced on March 5, 2018, to challenge the pending sale. The Company is still actively marketing the Wesson® oil business and expects to sell it within the next twelve months.
On November 9, 2016, we completed the previously announced spinoff (the "Spinoff") of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. ("Lamb Weston").$32.2 million. The results of operations of the Lamb Weston divested Del Monte® business have been reclassifiedwere included in our International segment for the periods preceding the completion of the transaction.

Restructuring Plans

In December2018, our Board of Directors (the "Board") approved a restructuring and integration plan related to discontinued operations for all periods presented.

In the first quarterongoing integration of fiscal 2017, we completed the sales of our Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business ("Spicetec") and our JM Swank business for combined proceeds of $489.0 million. The results ofrecently acquired operations of SpicetecPinnacle (the "Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan") for the purpose of achieving significant cost synergies between the companies, as a result of which we expect to incur material charges for exit and JM Swank are includeddisposal activities under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"). We have approved the incurrence of up to $360.0 million ($255.0 million of cash charges and $105.0 million of non-cash charges) in connection with operational expenditures under the Commercial segment.
Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan.



On February 1, 2016, pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, with TreeHouse Foods, Inc. ("TreeHouse"), we completed the disposition of our Private Brands business to TreeHouse for $2.6 billion in cash on a debt-free basis. The results of operations of the Private Brands business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Restructuring Plans
In May 2013, we announced the Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the "SCAE Plan"), our plan to integrate and restructure the operations of our Private Brands business, improve SG&A effectiveness and efficiencies, and optimize our supply chain network, manufacturing assets, dry distribution centers, and mixing centers. In fiscal 2016, we announced plans to realize efficiency benefits by reducing SG&A expenses and enhancing trade spend processes and tools, which plans were included as part of the SCAE Plan. Although we divested the Private Brands business, we have continued to implement the SCAE Plan, including by working to optimize our supply chain network, pursue cost reductions through our SG&A functions, enhance trade spend processes and tools, and improve productivity.

Although we remain unable to make good faith estimates relating to the entire SCAEPinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan, we are reporting on actions initiated through the end of fiscal 2018,2020, including the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of cost expected to be incurred, and the charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows. We have incurred or expect to incur approximately $360.2 million of charges ($277.2 million of cash charges and $83.0 million of non-cash charges) for actions identified to date under the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan. We recognized charges of $73.8 million and $168.2 million in connection with the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan in fiscal 2020 and 2019, respectively. We expect to incur costs related to the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan through fiscal 2022.

In fiscal 2019, management initiated a restructuring plan (the "Conagra Restructuring Plan") for costs in connection with actions taken to improve selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expense effectiveness and efficiencies and to optimize our supply chain network. Although we remain unable to make good faith estimates relating to the entire Conagra Restructuring Plan, we are reporting on actions initiated through the end of fiscal 2020, including the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of cost expected to be incurred, and the charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows. As of May 27, 2018, our Board of Directors has31, 2020, we have approved the incurrence of up to $900.9$131.1 million ($38.2 million of expenses in connectioncash charges and $92.9 million of non-cash charges) for several projects associated with the SCAE Plan, including expenses allocated for the Private Brands and Lamb Weston operations.Conagra Restructuring Plan. We have incurred or expect to incur approximately $471.6$129.5 million of charges ($322.140.1 million of cash charges and $149.5$89.4 million of non-cash charges) for actions identified to date under the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations.Conagra Restructuring Plan. We recognized charges of $38.0 million, $63.6$64.4 million and $281.8$2.2 million in relationconnection with the Conagra Restructuring Plan in fiscal 2020 and 2019, respectively.

COVID-19

We are closely monitoring the impact of the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) on all aspects of  our business. We experienced significantly higher sales during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 for our products in both of our Grocery & Snacks and Refrigerated & Frozen segments due to the SCAE Plan relatedCOVID-19 pandemic, as consumers increased their at-home consumption. We continue to see increased orders from retail customers in North America subsequent to the end of fiscal 2020 in response to increased consumer demand for food at home and expect that trend to continue for at least a portion of fiscal 2021 as work-from-home arrangements are extended in response to the continued spread of COVID-19. However, the increased consumer demand may reverse in the coming months as consumer purchasing behavior changes as a result of the economic downturn. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, we experienced reduced demand for our foodservice products across all of our major markets as consumer traffic in away-from-home food outlets decreased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We expect this trend to continue for at least a portion of fiscal 2021, which will continue to negatively impact our net sales to customers in our Foodservice segment. While we generally expect retail and foodservice demand levels to return to historical norms as we progress through fiscal 2021, given the inherent uncertainty of the situation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, we are unable to predict the nature and timing of when such normalization may occur.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, our operating margins saw improvement largely due to favorable overhead absorption at our manufacturing facilities, lower advertising and promotion costs, and reduced travel expenses. That benefit was largely offset by several factors including higher transportation and warehousing costs, temporary plant closures, employee safety and sanitation costs, and employee compensation costs, which accounted for an estimated $40 million of incremental costs in the fourth quarter.

We created an internal COVID-19 pandemic team in order to review and assess the evolving COVID-19 pandemic, and to recommend risk mitigation actions for the health and safety of our employees. In order to enhance the safety of our employees during the COVID-19 pandemic, we have implemented various measures, including the installation of physical barriers between employees in production facilities, extensive cleaning and sanitation of both production and office spaces, and implementation of broad work-from-home initiatives for office personnel. While all of these measures have been necessary and appropriate, they have resulted in additional costs, which we expect to continue to incur throughout fiscal 2021 to continue to address employee safety. The implementation of such safety measures has not resulted in any meaningful change to our control environment.

As mentioned above, we have experienced some challenges in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, including temporary closings of production facilities and reduced demand for certain of our products. Despite these challenges, there has been minimal disruption to our supply chain network to date, including the supply of our ingredients, packaging, or other sourced materials. However, we are continuing to closely monitor the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, as we cannot predict its ultimate impact on our suppliers, distributors, and manufacturers.

At this time, we have not experienced a net negative impact on our liquidity or results of operations in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.we believe we have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our cash needs. We expectwill continue to incur costs relatedevaluate the nature and extent of the impact to the SCAE Plan over a multi-year period.

our business, consolidated results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.  


SEGMENT REVIEW


During fiscal 2020, we reorganized our reporting segments to incorporate the Pinnacle business into our legacy reporting segments in order to better reflect how the business is now being managed. We now reflect our results of operations in fivefour reporting segments: Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, Foodservice, International, and Commercial.


Foodservice. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation.

Grocery & Snacks

The Grocery & Snacks reporting segment principally includes branded, shelf stableshelf-stable food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.

Refrigerated & Frozen

The Refrigerated & Frozen reporting segment principally includes branded, temperature controlledtemperature-controlled food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.

International

The International reporting segment principally includes branded food products, in various temperature states, sold in various retail and foodservice channels outside of the United States.

Foodservice

The Foodservice reporting segment includes branded and customized food products, including meals, entrees, sauces, and a variety of custom-manufactured culinary products, that are packaged for sale to restaurants and other foodservice establishments primarily in the United States.

Commercial
The Commercial reporting segment included commercially branded and private label food and ingredients, which were sold primarily to commercial, restaurant, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items included a variety of vegetable, spice, and frozen bakery goods, which were sold under brands such as Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings®. The Spicetec and JM Swank businesses were sold in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. These businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations.


Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) from Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results

Derivatives used to manage commodity price risk and foreign currency risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are generally recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings. In the event that management determines a particular derivative entered into as an economic hedge of a forecasted commodity purchase has ceased to function as an economic hedge, we cease recognizing further gains and losses on such derivatives in corporate expense and begin recognizing such gains and losses within segment operating results, immediately.

The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions, associated with continuing operations, under this methodology:

($ in millions)

 

Fiscal 2020

 

 

Fiscal 2019

 

 

Fiscal 2018

 

Net derivative losses incurred

 

$

(12.9

)

 

$

(3.6

)

 

$

(0.9

)

Less: Net derivative losses allocated to reporting segments

 

 

(7.4

)

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

(7.1

)

Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses

 

$

(5.5

)

 

$

(1.8

)

 

$

6.2

 

Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Grocery & Snacks

 

$

(4.7

)

 

$

(2.5

)

 

$

0.2

 

Net derivative losses allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

(0.3

)

Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to International

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

(6.9

)

Net derivative losses allocated to Foodservice

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Net derivative losses included in segment operating profit

 

$

(7.4

)

 

$

(1.8

)

 

$

(7.1

)

 Fiscal Years Ended
($ in millions)May 27,
2018
 May 28,
2017
 May 29,
2016
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred$(0.9) $0.6
 $(7.4)
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments(7.1) 5.7
 (23.8)
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses$6.2
 $(5.1) $16.4
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Grocery & Snacks$0.2
 $3.4
 $(14.4)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen(0.3) 0.8
 (6.2)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to International Foods(6.9) 1.6
 (0.5)
Net derivative losses allocated to Foodservice(0.1) 
 (1.0)
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial
 (0.1) (1.7)
Net derivative gains (losses) included in segment operating profit$(7.1) $5.7
 $(23.8)

As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, the cumulative amount of net derivative gainslosses from economic hedges that had been recognized in general corporate expenses and not yet allocated to reporting segments was $3.2$4.1 million. This amount reflected net losses of $4.5 million all of which was incurred during the fiscal year ended May 27, 2018.31, 2020, as well as net gains of $0.4 million incurred prior to fiscal 2020. Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results gainsnet losses of $2.5$2.1 million in fiscal 20192021 and $0.7$2.0 million in fiscal 20202022 and thereafter.


Fiscal 20182020 compared to Fiscal 2017

2019

Net Sales

($ in millions)

Reporting Segment

 

Fiscal 2020

Net Sales

 

 

Fiscal 2019

Net Sales

 

 

% Inc

(Dec)

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

$

4,617.1

 

 

$

3,923.6

 

 

 

18

%

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

4,559.6

 

 

 

3,735.4

 

 

 

22

%

International

 

 

925.3

 

 

 

864.4

 

 

 

7

%

Foodservice

 

 

952.4

 

 

 

1,015.0

 

 

 

(6

)%

Total

 

$

11,054.4

 

 

$

9,538.4

 

 

 

16

%

($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2018 Net Sales Fiscal 2017 Net Sales 
% Inc
(Dec)
Grocery & Snacks$3,287.0
 $3,208.8
 2 %
Refrigerated & Frozen2,753.0
 2,652.7
 4 %
International843.5
 816.0
 3 %
Foodservice1,054.8
 1,078.3
 (2)%
Commercial
 71.1
 (100)%
Total$7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 1 %

Overall, our net sales were $7.94$11.05 billion in fiscal 2018,2020, an increase of 1%16% compared to fiscal 2017.

2019.

Grocery & Snacks net sales for fiscal 20182020 were $3.29$4.62 billion, an increase of $78.2$693.5 million, or 2%18%, compared to fiscal 2017. Results reflected a decrease in volumes2019. Volume, excluding the impact of approximately 2%acquisitions and divestitures, increased 10% in fiscal 20182020 compared to the prior-year period, excludingperiod. This result reflected an increase across multiple categories, primarily in the impactfourth quarter of acquisitions. The decreasefiscal 2020, as consumers increased their at-home food consumption in sales volumes reflected a reduction in promotional intensity, planned discontinuation of certain lower-performing products, retailer inventory reductions, which were higher than anticipated, and deliberate actions to optimize distribution on certain lower-margin products, consistentconnection with the Company's value over volume strategy.COVID-19 pandemic. Price/



mix was flatdecreased 1% compared to the prior-year period as favorable mix improvements from recent innovationprior year due to incremental trade and higherstrategic investments with certain customers and brands. The inclusion of an additional week of results in fiscal 2020 accounted for 2% of the increase in net pricing nearly offset continued investments in retailer marketing to drive brand saliency, enhanced distribution, and consumer trial.sales. The acquisition of Angie's Artisan Treats, LLCPinnacle in the second quarter of fiscal 2019 contributed $68.1$406.3 million, or 10%, to Grocery & Snacks net sales during fiscal 2018. The Frontera acquisition contributed $8.6 million and the Thanasi acquisition contributed $66.5 million to Grocery & Snacks net sales during fiscal 20182020, through the one-year anniversariesanniversary of the acquisitions. The Fronteraacquisition. Fiscal 2020 and Thanasi acquisitions occurred2019 included $23.1 million and $39.5 million, respectively, of net sales related to our private label peanut butter business, which we exited in September 2016the third quarter of fiscal 2020. Fiscal 2020 and April 2017, respectively.
2019 included $46.1 million and $59.6 million, respectively, of net sales related to our DSD snacks business, which was sold in the second quarter of fiscal 2020. Fiscal 2019 results included $115.9 million of net sales related to our Wesson® oil business, which was sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019.

Refrigerated & Frozen net sales for fiscal 20182020 were $2.75$4.56 billion, an increase of $100.3$824.2 million, or 4%22%, compared to fiscal 2017.2019. Results for fiscal 20182020 reflected a 3%5% increase in volume compared to fiscal 2017,2019, excluding the impact of acquisitions.acquisitions and divestitures. The increase in sales volumes was a result of brand renovationconsumers increasing their at-home food consumption in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic and new innovation launches.during the current fiscal year. Price/mix was flatincreased 1% compared to fiscal 2017, as favorability2019. The inclusion of an additional week of results in bothfiscal 2020 accounted for 2% of the increase in net pricing and mix offset continued investment in retailer marketing to drive brand saliency, enhanced distribution, and consumer trial.sales. The acquisition of the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® businessPinnacle contributed $21.3$567.6 million, or 15%, to Refrigerated & Frozen'sFrozen net sales duringfor fiscal 2018. The Frontera acquisition, which occurred in September 2016, and subsequent innovation in the Frontera® brand contributed $4.4 million during fiscal 20182020, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition.

Fiscal 2020 included $23.2 million of net sales related to our Lender's® bagel business, which was sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2020. Fiscal 2019 included $24.0 million of net sales related to this business. Fiscal 2019 also included $56.7 million of net sales related to our Italian-based frozen pasta business, Gelit, which was sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019.

International net sales for fiscal 20182020 were $843.5$925.3 million, an increase of $27.5$60.9 million, or 3%7%, compared to fiscal 2017.2019. Results for fiscal 20182020 reflected a 3% decrease4% increase in volume, excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, a 3% increase2% decrease due to foreign exchange rates, a 2% increase due to the inclusion of an additional week of results, and a 3%1% increase in price/mix, in each case compared to fiscal 2017.2019. The volume decreaseincreases for fiscal 2018 was2020 were driven by strategic decisions to eliminate lower margin products and to reduce promotional intensity. The increase in price/mix comparedelevated demand related to the prior-year periodimpacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by lower volumes in India due to the country-wide closure of manufacturing plants and stores during the fourth quarter. The acquisition of Pinnacle contributed $46.0 million, or 5%, to International net sales for fiscal 2020, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition. Fiscal 2019 included $17.1 million of net sales related to our divested Wesson® oil business. Fiscal 2019 also included $4.1 million of net sales related to our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada, which was driven by improvementssold in pricing and trade productivity.

the first quarter of fiscal 2019.

Foodservice net sales for fiscal 20182020 were $1.05 billion,$952.4 million, a decrease of $23.5$62.6 million, or 2%6%, compared to fiscal 2017.2019. Results for fiscal 20182020 reflected an 11%a 13% decrease in volume, partially offset by a 9% increase in price/mix compared to fiscal 2017. The decrease in volumes compared to the prior-year period primarily reflectedexcluding the impact of exitingacquisitions and divestitures. The decline in volume reflected lower restaurant traffic as a non-core business,result of the planned discontinuation of certain lower-performing businesses,COVID-19 pandemic and softness in certain categories. The increase in price/mix for fiscal 2018 reflected favorable product and customer mix, the impact of inflation-driven increases in pricing, and thecontinued execution of the segment's value over volumevalue-over-volume strategy.

In Price/mix increased 3% in fiscal 2020 compared to fiscal 2019, reflecting inflation-related pricing and the firstvalue-over-volume strategy. The decrease in net sales was offset by a 1% increase attributable to an additional week of results in fiscal 2020. The acquisition of Pinnacle contributed $57.7 million, or 6%, for fiscal 2020, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition. Fiscal 2020 and 2019 included $6.6 million and $6.2 million, respectively, of net sales related to our Lender's® bagel business, which was sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we divested our Spicetec and JM Swank businesses. These businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation2020. Fiscal 2020 included $4.6 million of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations. Accordingly, there were no net sales related to our private label peanut butter business, which we exited in the Commercial segment after the firstthird quarter of fiscal 2017. These businesses had2020. Fiscal 2019 included $8.8 million of net sales related to this business. Fiscal 2019 included $34.2 million of net sales related to our Wesson® oil business, which was sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019. Fiscal 2019 also included net sales of $71.1$2.0 million related to our Trenton, Missouri production facility, which was sold in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 prior to the completion of the divestitures.2019.


SG&A Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)

SG&A expenses totaled $1.32$1.62 billion for fiscal 2018, a decrease2020, an increase of $99.1$149.1 million compared to fiscal 2017.2019. SG&A expenses for fiscal 20182020 reflected the following:

Items impacting comparability of earnings

expenses of $165.5 million related to the impairment of intangible assets,

charges totaling $151.0 million related to certain litigation matters,

expenses of $105.7 million in connection with our restructuring plans,

a charge of $34.9 million related to the early termination of an unfavorable lease contract,

expense of $59.0 million related to the impairment of businesses held for sale,

expenses of $30.2 million in connection with our SCAE Plan,

a benefit of $11.9 million related to a contract settlement,

expenses of $15.1 million associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and planned divestitures,

charges totaling $10.1 million related to legal and environmental matters,

charges of $5.4 million related to pension plan lump-sum settlements and a remeasurement of our salaried and non-qualified pension plan liability,

expenses of $5.3 million associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and divestitures, and

charges totaling $4.8 million related to the impairment of other intangible assets.

a net loss of $1.7 million related to divestitures of businesses.

Other changes in expenses compared to fiscal 20172019

an increase in incentive compensation expense of $44.8 million, due to exceeding certain performance targets,

a decrease in advertising and promotion expense of $49.7

an increase in share-based payment and deferred compensation expense of $33.0 million, due to an increase in stock price and exceeding certain performance targets,

a decrease in pension and postretirement expense of $19.4 million (excluding the impacts of settlements and remeasurements),

a decrease in advertising and promotion expense of $22.7 million, largely as spending was reduced in the fourth quarter with elevated sales demand,


an increase of $11.5 million in information technology-related expenses,


a decrease in self-insured workers' compensation and product liability expense of $10.9 million,

a decrease in transaction services agreement income of $18.3

an increase of $10.7 million of amortization of definite lived intangible assets, attributable to the Pinnacle acquisition,

a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $14.6

an increase in charitable contributions of $7.3 million, in part due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic,

a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $10.4

a decrease in professional fees of $7.2 million,

a decrease in contract services of $9.4

a decrease in royalty expense of $7.2 million, in part due to the expiration of a royalty agreement,

a decrease in charitable contributions of $6.7,

a decrease in depreciation expense of $5.8 million,

an increase in salaries expense of $19.4 million,

a decrease in travel and entertainment expense of $4.4 million, in part due to reduced travel from the COVID-19 pandemic,

an increase in self-insured workers' compensation and product liability expense of $7.0 million.

a decrease in commission expense of $3.8 million, and

an increase in transaction services agreement income of $3.4 million.

SG&A expenses for fiscal 20172019 included the following items impacting the comparability of earnings:

charges totaling $237.1 million related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, primarily in the International segment,
gains totaling $197.4 million, from the divestiture of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,
charges totaling $93.3 million related to the early retirement of debt,

expenses of $170.3 million in connection with our restructuring plans,

a charge

expenses of $67.1$106.2 million associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and divestitures,

expenses of $89.6 million related to intangible impairments,

gains of $69.4 million related to the impairmentdivestitures of the Chef Boyardee® brand intangible,businesses,

expenses of $46.4 million in connection with our SCAE Plan,

a benefit of $39.1 million related to legal matters,

charges

a benefit of $30.9$27.3 million related to the planned divestiturenovation of our Wesson® oil business, including an impairment chargea legacy guarantee,

a benefit of $27.6$15.1 million related to the production assetsfair value adjustment of the business that were not initiallycash settleable equity awards issued in connection with, and included in the assets heldconsideration for sale,the Pinnacle acquisition, and

an expense of $13.8 million in connection with a salaried pension plan lump sum settlement we completed in fiscal 2017, and
a benefit of $5.7 million in connection with a legal matter.

expenses of $8.9 million related to costs associated with the integration of Pinnacle.

Segment Operating Profit (Earnings before general corporate expenses, pension and postretirement non-service income, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)

($ in millions)

Reporting Segment

 

Fiscal 2020

Operating

Profit

 

 

Fiscal 2019

Operating

Profit

 

 

% Inc

(Dec)

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

$

915.2

 

 

$

762.6

 

 

 

20

%

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

702.2

 

 

 

645.1

 

 

 

9

%

International

 

 

100.6

 

 

 

99.8

 

 

 

1

%

Foodservice

 

 

97.6

 

 

 

134.3

 

 

 

(27

)%

($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2018 Operating Profit Fiscal 2017 Operating Profit 
% Inc
(Dec)
Grocery & Snacks$724.8
 $653.7
 11 %
Refrigerated & Frozen479.4
 445.8
 8 %
International86.5
 (168.9) N/A
Foodservice121.8
 105.1
 16 %
Commercial
 202.6
 (100)%

Grocery & Snacks operating profit for fiscal 20182020 was $724.8$915.2 million, an increase of $71.1$152.6 million, or 11%20%, compared to fiscal 2017.2019. Gross profits were $20.2$229.0 million lowerhigher in fiscal 20182020 than in fiscal 2017.2019. The lowerhigher gross profit was driven by investmentsthe increase in at-home food consumption in connection with retailers (i.e., trade spending reflected as a reductionthe COVID-19 pandemic, the addition of net sales), as well asPinnacle, the impact of the 53rd week of our fiscal year, and the benefits of supply chain realized productivity, partially offset by the impacts of higher input costs, a reduction in profit associated with the divestiture of our DSD snacks and transportation expenses, partially offset byWesson® oil businesses, the exit of our private label peanut butter business, and pandemic-related costs. Pandemic-related costs included investments in employee safety protocols, bonuses paid to supply chain realized productivity. The Frontera acquisition, Thanasi acquisition,employees, and the acquisitioncosts necessary to meet elevated levels of Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, which occurred in September 2016, April 2017, and October 2017, respectively, contributed $47.4 million to Grocery & Snacks gross profit during fiscal 2018 through the one-year anniversaries of the acquisitions (if reached). Advertising and promotion expenses for fiscal 2018 decreased by $19.5 million compared to fiscal 2017.demand. Operating profit of the Grocery & Snacks segment was impacted by charges totaling $4.0 million in fiscal 2018 for the impairmentexpense of our HK Anderson®, Red Fork®, and Salpica® brand assets and $68.3 million in fiscal 2017 primarily for the impairment of our Chef Boyardee® brand asset. Grocery & Snacks also incurred $11.4 million of expenses in fiscal 2018 related to acquisitions and divestitures, charges of $31.4 million in fiscal 2017 related to the pending divestiture of the



Wesson® oil business, and charges of $14.1$58.4 million and $25.3$6.1 million in connection withrelated to our restructuring plans in fiscal 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
Fiscal 2020 and 2019 included brand intangible impairment charges of $46.4 million and $76.5 million, respectively. Fiscal 2020 also included a charge of $31.4 million related to the impairment of a business held for sale, a benefit of $11.9 million related to a contract settlement, and costs of $3.0 million related to divestitures. Fiscal 2019 included a gain of $33.1 million related to the sale of our Wesson® oil business and $30.2 million of incremental cost of goods sold due to the impact of writing Pinnacle inventory to fair value as part of our acquisition accounting and the subsequent sale of that inventory.

Refrigerated & Frozen operating profit for fiscal 20182020 was $479.4$702.2 million, an increase of $33.6$57.1 million, or 8%9%, compared to fiscal 2017.2019. Gross profits were $3.6$227.1 million lowerhigher in fiscal 20182020 than in fiscal 2017, driven by continuing increases2019, due to the increase in input costs and transportation inflation as well as investments to drive distribution, enhanced shelf presence, and trial, partially offset by increased sales volumesat-home food consumption resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the addition of Pinnacle, the impact of the 53rd week of our fiscal year, and supply chain realized productivity. The acquisitionproductivity, partially offset by higher input costs, lost profit from the divestiture of the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsinour Lender's® business contributed $4.6 million to gross profit in the segment during fiscal 2018. Advertising bagel and promotion expenses for fiscal 2018 decreased by $23.4 million compared to fiscal 2017.Italian-based frozen pasta businesses, and pandemic-related costs. Operating profit of the Refrigerated & Frozen segment was impacted by charges totaling approximately $7.7of $110.8 million related to the impairment of certain brand intangible assets during fiscal 2020. Fiscal 2020 and 2019 included $15.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of charges related to our restructuring plans. In addition, operating profit of the Refrigerated & Frozen segment included $27.6 million related to the impairment of a business held for sale in fiscal 20172020. Fiscal 2019 included a gain of $23.1 million related to a product recall,the sale of our Italian-based frozen pasta business, and $21.9 million of incremental cost of goods sold due to the impact of writing Pinnacle inventory to fair value as well as chargespart of $0.1our acquisition accounting and the subsequent sale of that inventory. Advertising and promotion expenses for fiscal 2020 decreased by $13.7 million and $6.2 million in connection with our restructuring plans incompared to fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.

2019.

International operating profit for fiscal 20182020 was $86.5$100.6 million, an increase of $0.8 million, or 1%, compared to an operating loss of $168.9 million for fiscal 2017. The operating loss in fiscal 2017 includes charges totaling $235.9 million for the impairment of goodwill and an intangible brand asset in our Canadian and Mexican operations.2019. Gross profits were $18.6$6.4 million higherlower in fiscal 2018 than in2020 compared to fiscal 2017, as a result2019, due to higher input costs, increased retailer investments, the sales of improved price/mix,our Del Monte® Canadian and Wesson® oil businesses, and pandemic-related costs, partially offset by the favorableincreased demand related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the addition of Pinnacle, the impact of the 53rd week of our fiscal year, and realized productivity. International gross profits also reflected a decrease of $13.7 million due to foreign exchange andrates compared to the planned discontinuations of certain lower-performing products.prior-year period. Operating profit of the International segment was impacted by charges of $1.5$8.3 million and $0.9$13.1 million in connection withrelated to the impairment of certain brand intangible assets during fiscal 2020 and 2019, respectively. Fiscal 2020 and 2019 included expense of $1.6 million and $4.9 million, respectively, related to our restructuring plans, inplans. In addition, fiscal 20182019 included a gain of $13.2 million related to the sale of our Del Monte® Canadian business and 2017, respectively.

expense of $2.9 million related to costs incurred for divestitures.

Foodservice operating profit for fiscal 20182020 was $121.8$97.6 million, a decrease of $36.7 million, or 27%, compared to fiscal 2019. Gross profits were $29.4 million lower in fiscal 2020 than in fiscal 2019, reflecting lower restaurant traffic due to the COVID-19 pandemic, higher inventory write-offs, higher input costs, the sales of our Wesson® oil and Lender's® bagel businesses, the exit of our private label peanut butter business, and the sale of our Trenton, Missouri facility. These were slightly offset by the addition of Pinnacle, the impact of the 53rd week of our fiscal year, and supply chain realized productivity.


Pension and Postretirement Non-service Income

In fiscal 2020, pension and postretirement non-service income was $9.9 million, a decrease of $25.2 million compared to fiscal 2019. The decrease was driven by a charge of $44.8 million in fiscal 2020 compared to a charge of $5.1 million in fiscal 2019 related to the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability. The increase in losses outside of the 10% corridor was driven by a reduction of the discount rate used to remeasure the pension obligations to present value and a reduction in asset values for certain plan assets. Excluding our year-end actuarial losses outside the corridor, our pension income increased due to lower interest costs as a result of declining interest rates.

Interest Expense, Net

In fiscal 2020, net interest expense was $487.1 million, an increase of $16.7$95.7 million, or 16%, compared to fiscal 2017. Gross profits were $13.9 million higher in fiscal 2018 than in fiscal 2017, primarily reflecting the impact of inflation-driven increases in pricing and supply chain realized productivity, partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased input costs. Operating profit of the Foodservice segment was impacted by charges of $1.8 million in fiscal 2017 in connection with our restructuring plans.

Commercial operating profit was $202.6 million in fiscal 2017. The Company sold the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, recognizing pre-tax gains totaling $197.4 million. The Spicetec and JM Swank businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations. There are no further operations in the Commercial segment.
Interest Expense, Net
In fiscal 2018, net interest expense was $158.7 million, a decrease of $36.8 million, or 19%25%, from fiscal 2017.2019. The decrease reflectsincrease reflected the repaymentissuance of $550.0 million$7.025 billion aggregate principal amount of outstandingunsecured senior notes and borrowings of $1.30 billion under our unsecured term loan agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for a $650.0 million tranche of three-year term loans and a $650.0 million tranche of five-year term loans to the Company (the "Term Loan Agreement"), in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, $473.0 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding senior notes in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, $119.6 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding senior notes in the third quarter of fiscal 2018, $70.0 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding senior notes in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, as well as the exchange of $1.44 billion of debteach case in connection with the Spinoffacquisition of Lamb Weston during the second quarter of 2017. This was partially offset by the issuance of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes due 2020 duringPinnacle in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 and2019. As of May 31, 2020, we repaid all of our borrowings under the borrowingTerm Loan Agreement.

In addition, fiscal 2019 included $11.9 million of $300.0 million under our term loan agreement during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. For more information about the debt exchange, see Note 4 "Long-Term Debt"interest expense related to the consolidated financial statements containedamortization of costs incurred to secure fully committed bridge financing in this report.

connection with the then-pending Pinnacle acquisition. The bridge financing was subsequently terminated in connection with our incurrence of permanent financing to fund the Pinnacle acquisition, and we recognized the remaining unamortized financing costs of $33.8 million within SG&A expenses.

Income Taxes

Our income tax expense was $174.6$201.3 million and $254.7$218.8 million in fiscal 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was approximately 18%19% and 32%24% for fiscal 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.

The Tax Act was enacted into law on December 22, 2017. The changes to U.S. tax law include, but are not limited to:
reducing the federal statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018;
eliminating the deduction for domestic manufacturing activities, which impacts us beginning in fiscal 2019;
requiring companies to pay a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries;
repealing the exception for deductibility of performance-based compensation to covered employees, along with expanding the number of covered employees;
allowing immediate expensing of machinery and equipment contracted for purchase after September 27, 2017; and


changing taxation of multinational companies, including a new minimum tax on Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, a new Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax, and a new U.S. corporate deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income, all of which are effective for us beginning in 2019.
As a result of our fiscal year end, the lower U.S. statutory federal income tax rate resulted in a blended U.S. federal statutory rate of 29.3% for the fiscal year ended May 27, 2018. The U.S. federal statutory rate is expected to be 21% for fiscal years beginning after May 27, 2018.

The effective tax rate in fiscal 20182020 reflects the following:

the impact of U.S. tax reform, as noted above,

the impact of a legal entity reorganization,

an adjustment of the valuation allowance associated with the Wesson® oil business,

additional state income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions,

a benefit from the settlement of tax issues that were previously reserved,

additional benefit due to a change in the deferred state tax rates relating to the integration of Pinnacle activity for income tax purposes,

an income tax benefit associated with a tax planning strategy that will allow us to utilize certain state tax attributes,

additional income tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill related to assets held for sale, for which an impairment charge was recognized,

a tax benefit resulting from law changes,

a benefit from statute lapses on tax issues that were previously reserved, and

an income tax benefit associated with a deduction of a prior year federal income tax matter.


The effective tax rate in fiscal 2019 reflects the following:

the impact of legal entity reorganization resulting in a benefit related to undistributed foreign earnings for which the indefinite reinvestment assertion is no longer made,

additional tax expense on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings,

an adjustment of valuation allowance associated with the terminationexpected capital gains from the divestiture of the agreement for the proposed sale of our Wesson® oil business,and Gelit businesses,

an indirect cost of the pension contribution made on February 26, 2018,
additional expense related to the settlement of an audit of the impact of a law change in Mexico,
an income tax benefit allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our employees, beyond that which is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant, and
additional expense related to undistributed foreign earnings for which the indefinite reinvestment assertion is no longer made.
The effective tax rate in fiscal 2017 reflects the following:
additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill sold in connection with the divestitures of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,
additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill in our Mexican and Canadian businesses, for which an impairment charge was recognized,

an income

additional tax benefit for the adjustment of a valuation allowanceexpense on non-deductible facilitative costs associated with the planned divestiturePinnacle acquisition,

a benefit recognized due to the non-taxability of the Wesson® oil business,novation of a legacy guarantee,

an income tax benefit for excess tax benefits allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our employees, beyond that which is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant, and
an income tax benefit associated with a tax planning strategy that allowed us to utilize certain state tax attributes and certain foreign incentives.

a benefit recognized due to a reduction in the fair value of equity awards subject to limitations on deductibility that were issued to Pinnacle executives as replacement awards at the time of the acquisition,

an increase to the deemed repatriation tax liability,

additional tax expense due to foreign and domestic restructuring, and

a state tax benefit from integration of the Pinnacle business.

We expect our effective tax rate in fiscal 2019,2021, exclusive of any unusual transactions or tax events, to be approximately 23%-24%.

Equity Method Investment Earnings

We include our share of the earnings of certain affiliates based on our economic ownership interest in the affiliates. Our most significant affiliate is the Ardent Mills joint venture. Our share of earnings from our equity method investment earnings were $97.3$73.2 million and $71.2$75.8 million for fiscal 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. A benefit of $4.3 million wasResults for fiscal 2020 and 2019 included in the earnings of fiscal 2018 in connection with a gain onof $4.1 million and $15.1 million, respectively, from the substantial liquidationsale of an internationalassets by the Ardent Mills joint venture. In addition, Ardent Mills earnings were higher than they werefor fiscal 2020 reflected increased retail demand in the prior-year periods due tofourth quarter, which more favorablethan offset reduced foodservice demand and unfavorable market conditions and continued improvement in operating effectiveness.



Results of Discontinued Operations
Our discontinued operations generated after-tax income of $14.3 million and $102.0 million in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. During fiscal 2018, a $14.5 million income tax benefit was recorded due to an adjustmentduring the first three quarters of the estimated deductibility ofyear after adjusting for the costs incurred associated with effecting the Spinoff of Lamb Weston. The prior-year period results reflected the operations of Lamb Weston through the date of its Spinoff in November 2016. We incurred significant costs associated with effecting the Spinoff of Lamb Weston. These costs are included in results of discontinued operations.
items mentioned above.

Earnings Per Share

Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 20182020 were $1.98,$1.72. Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2019 were $1.52, including earnings of $1.95$1.53 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.03a loss of $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations. DilutedThe increase in diluted earnings per share reflected higher net income, partially offset by an increase in fiscal 2017 were $1.46, including earningsthe number of $1.25 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.21 per diluted share from discontinued operations. See shares. In addition, see "Items Impacting Comparability" above as several significant items affected the comparability of year-over-year results of operations.

Fiscal 20172019 compared to Fiscal 2016

2018

Net Sales

($ in millions)

Reporting Segment

 

Fiscal 2019

Net Sales

 

 

Fiscal 2018

Net Sales

 

 

% Inc

(Dec)

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

$

3,923.6

 

 

$

3,281.0

 

 

 

20

%

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

3,735.4

 

 

 

2,753.0

 

 

 

36

%

International

 

 

864.4

 

 

 

843.5

 

 

 

3

%

Foodservice

 

 

1,015.0

 

 

 

1,060.8

 

 

 

(4

)%

Total

 

$

9,538.4

 

 

$

7,938.3

 

 

 

20

%

($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2017 Net Sales Fiscal 2016 Net Sales 
% Inc
(Dec)
Grocery & Snacks$3,208.8
 $3,377.1
 (5)%
Refrigerated & Frozen2,652.7
 2,867.8
 (8)%
International816.0
 846.6
 (4)%
Foodservice1,078.3
 1,104.5
 (2)%
Commercial71.1
 468.1
 (85)%
Total$7,826.9
 $8,664.1
 (10)%

Overall, our net sales were $7.83$9.54 billion in fiscal 2017, a decrease2019, an increase of 10%20% compared to fiscal 2016.

2018.

Grocery & Snacks net sales for fiscal 20172019 were $3.21$3.92 billion, a decreasean increase of $168.3$642.6 million, or 5%20%, compared to fiscal 2016. Results reflected a decrease in volumes2018. Volume, excluding the impact of approximately 5%acquisitions and divestitures, was flat in fiscal 20172019 compared to the prior-year period. The decreaseThis result reflected merchandising changes and price elasticity-related declines in sales volumes wascertain brands, as well as isolated production


challenges, partially offset by the result of reduced trade promotionscontinued benefit from momentum and innovation successes in the planned exit of certain lower-performing products.snacks businesses. Price/mix was flat compared to the prior year as the continued progressunfavorable mix, coupled with increases in pricing and trade productivity was fullybrand building investments with retailers were offset by unfavorable sales mix.the impact of higher pricing. The reduced trade promotions and selective base price increases are actions that are intended to build a higher quality revenue base. The Frontera acquisition andof Pinnacle in the Thanasi acquisition collectivelysecond quarter of fiscal 2019 contributed $36.5$646.7 million, or 1%20%, to segmentGrocery & Snacks net sales during fiscal 2017.

2019. The acquisition of Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, which was completed in October 2017, contributed $41.3 million to Grocery & Snacks net sales during fiscal 2019, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition. Fiscal 2019 results included $115.9 million of net sales related to our Wesson®oil business, which was sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019. Fiscal 2018 results included $156.4 million of net sales related to this divested business.

Refrigerated & Frozen net sales for fiscal 20172019 were $2.65$3.74 billion, a decreasean increase of $215.1$982.4 million, or 8%36%, compared to fiscal 2016.2018. Results for fiscal 20172019 reflected a 9% decrease in volume and a 1% increase in price/mixvolume compared to fiscal 2016.2018, excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures. The decreaseincrease in sales volumes was a result of innovation across multiple brands, which was partially offset by the effects of reduced merchandising spend and improvementsthe impact of a recall during the fourth quarter. Price/mix was flat compared to fiscal 2018, as continued delivery of top-line accretive innovation in price/mix reflected reduced trade promotions and selective base price increases, togetherseveral brands was partially offset by brand building investments with stock-keeping unit rationalization, which actions were intended to build a higher quality revenue base. Net sales growth was also negatively affected by a transitory increaseretailers. The acquisition of Pinnacle in the volumesecond quarter of Egg Beatersfiscal 2019 contributed $931.4 million, or 34%, to Refrigerated & Frozen net sales during fiscal 2019. The acquisition of the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business, which was completed in February 2018, contributed $25.7 million to Refrigerated & Frozen's net sales during fiscal 2016 as2019, through the Company's egg supply was not negatively impacted byone-year anniversary of the avian influenza outbreak in fiscal 2015.

acquisition.

International net sales for fiscal 20172019 were $816.0$864.4 million, a decreasean increase of $30.6$20.9 million, or 4%3%, compared to fiscal 2016.2018. Results for fiscal 20172019 reflected a 3% decrease2% increase in volume, excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, a 3%4% decrease due to foreign exchange rates, and a 2% increase in price/mix, in each case compared to fiscal 2016.2018. The volume decreaseand price/mix increases for fiscal 2017 was2019 were driven by significant shipmentsgrowth in earlythe Canadian snacks and frozen businesses. The acquisition of Pinnacle in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 due2019 contributed $70.9 million, or 8%, to recovery from the West Coast port disruptionsInternational net sales during fiscal 2015, aggressive pricing actions, reduced trade promotions,2019. The acquisition of Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC contributed $3.7 million to International net sales for fiscal 2019, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition. Fiscal 2019 included $4.1 million of net sales related to our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada, which was sold in the planned discontinuationfirst quarter of certain lower-margin products.

fiscal 2019. Fiscal 2018 results included $48.9 million of net sales related to this divested business. In addition, fiscal 2019 and 2018 results included $17.1 million and $24.5 million, respectively, related to our divested Wesson® oil business.

Foodservice net sales for fiscal 20172019 were $1.08$1.02 billion, a decrease of $26.2$45.8 million, or 2%4%, compared to fiscal 2016.2018. Results for fiscal 20172019 reflected a 4%7% decrease in volume, offset by a 2% increaseexcluding divestitures. The decline in price/mix compared to fiscal 2016. The decrease in volumes primarilyvolume reflected the impactcontinued execution of exiting a non-core business.



Inthe segment's value-over-volume strategy and the sale of our Trenton, Missouri production facility in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we divested our Spicetec2019. Price/mix increased 4% in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018. The increase in price/mix for fiscal 2019 reflected favorable product and JM Swank businesses. These businesses comprisecustomer mix, the entire Commercial segment followingimpact of inflation-driven increases in pricing, and the presentationexecution of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations. Accordingly, there were no net salesthe segment's value-over-volume strategy. The acquisition of Pinnacle in the Commercial segment after the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2017. These businesses had2019 contributed $78.6 million, or 7%, to Foodservice net sales during fiscal 2019. Fiscal 2019 included $34.2 million of $71.1net sales related to our Wesson® oil business, which was sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019. Fiscal 2018 results included $53.4 million of net sales related to this divested business. Net sales declined by approximately 7% in fiscal 2017 prior2019 due to the completionsale of the divestitures. Net sales in the Commercial segment were $468.1 million in fiscal 2016.
our Trenton, Missouri production facility.

SG&A Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)

SG&A expenses totaled $1.42$1.47 billion for fiscal 2017,2019, a decrease of $607.5$75.0 million compared to fiscal 2016.2018. SG&A expenses for fiscal 20172019 reflected the following:

Items impacting comparability of earnings

charges totaling $237.1 million related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, primarily in the International segment,
gains totaling $197.4 million from the divestiture of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,

expenses of $170.3 million in connection with our restructuring plans,

a charge

expenses of $67.1$106.2 million associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and divestitures,

expenses of $89.6 million related to intangible impairments,

gains of $69.4 million related to the impairmentdivestitures of the Chef Boyardee® brand intangible,businesses,

charges totaling $93.3 million related to the early retirement of debt,
expenses of $46.4 million in connection with our SCAE Plan,

a benefit of $39.1 million related to legal matters,

charges

a benefit of $30.9$27.3 million related to the planned divestiturenovation of our Wesson® oil business, including an impairment chargea legacy guarantee,


a benefit of $27.6$15.1 million related to the production assetsfair value adjustment of the business that initially were notcash settleable equity awards issued in connection with, and included in the assets heldconsideration for sale,the Pinnacle acquisition, and

an expense of $13.8 million in connection with a salaried pension plan lump sum settlement we completed in fiscal 2017, and
a benefit of $5.7 million in connection with a legal matter.

expenses of $8.9 million related to costs associated with the integration of Pinnacle.

Other changes in expenses compared to fiscal 20162018

an increase of $81.9 million related to Pinnacle SG&A expenses not included in other items noted herein, representing such costs incurred from October 26, 2018 through May 26, 2019,

a decrease in salaries expenses of $104.3

a decrease in advertising and promotion expense of $25.2 million, including $34.0 million of expense attributable to Pinnacle,

a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $38.3

an increase in salary and wage expense of $61.6 million, including $60.2 million attributable to Pinnacle,

a decrease in pension and postretirement expense of $19.8 million (excluding items impacting the comparability of earnings),

a decrease in share-based payment and deferred compensation expense of $13.1 million due to lower share price and market declines, including $1.0 million of expense attributable to Pinnacle,

a decrease in advertising and promotion spending of $18.9

a decrease in pension and postretirement service expense of $9.6 million,

a decrease in broker commission expense of $18.3

an increase in defined contribution plan expense of $6.9 million, including $2.4 million attributable to Pinnacle,

an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $15.2

a decrease in charitable contributions of $5.4 million,

an increase in charitable contributions of $6.3 million, and

a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $4.3 million, including $6.4 million attributable to Pinnacle,

a decrease in self-insured healthcare expenses of $5.7 million.

an increase in self-insured workers' compensation and product liability expense of $3.3 million, and

a decrease in transaction services agreement income of $2.9 million.

SG&A expenses for fiscal 20162018 included the following items impacting the comparability of earnings:

a charge of $348.5 million reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability,
expenses totaling $232.8 million in connection with our SCAE Plan,

charges totaling $151.0 million related to certain litigation matters,

a charge of $50.1$34.9 million related to the early termination of an unfavorable lease contract,

expenses of $30.2 million in connection with our SCAE Plan,

expenses of $15.1 million associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and divestitures, and

charges totaling $4.8 million related to the impairment of the Chef Boyardee® brandother intangible assets.

charges of $23.9 million related to the repurchase of certain senior notes, and


a charge of $5.0 million in connection with a legal matter.

Segment Operating Profit (Earnings before general corporate expenses, pension and postretirement non-service income, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)

($ in millions)

Reporting Segment

 

Fiscal 2019

Operating

Profit

 

 

Fiscal 2018

Operating

Profit

 

 

% Inc

(Dec)

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

$

762.6

 

 

$

722.5

 

 

 

6

%

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

645.1

 

 

 

479.4

 

 

 

35

%

International

 

 

99.8

 

 

 

86.5

 

 

 

15

%

Foodservice

 

 

134.3

 

 

 

124.1

 

 

 

8

%

($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2017 Operating Profit Fiscal 2016 Operating Profit 
% Inc
(Dec)
Grocery & Snacks$653.7
 $592.9
 10%
Refrigerated & Frozen445.8
 420.4
 6%
International(168.9) 66.7
 N/A
Foodservice105.1
 97.7
 8%
Commercial202.6
 45.4
 346%

Grocery & Snacks operating profit for fiscal 20172019 was $653.7$762.6 million, an increase of $60.8$40.1 million, or 10%6%, compared to fiscal 2016.2018. Gross profits were $36.5$70.6 million higher in fiscal 20172019 than in fiscal 2016.2018. The higher gross profit was driven by reduced trade promotions, improved plantprofit contribution of acquisitions and supply chain realized productivity, and lower commodity input costs, partially offset by lower sales volumes, duehigher input costs, transportation inflation, and a reduction in partprofit associated with the divestiture of the Wesson® oil business. The acquisition of Pinnacle contributed $125.1 million to pricing actions on certain products. SG&AGrocery & Snacks gross profit in fiscal 2019. The acquisition of Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC contributed $12.6 million to Grocery & Snacks gross profit in fiscal 2019, through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition. Advertising and promotion expenses for fiscal 2019 decreased by $24.3$18.4 million in fiscal 2017, as compared to fiscal 2016, largely as a result of cost reductions achieved through our restructuring plans, as well as a $5.6 million reduction in advertising and promotion expenses.2018. Operating profit of the Grocery & Snacks segment was impacted by charges totaling $68.3$76.5 million and $50.1 million, primarilyin fiscal 2019 for the impairment of our Chef Boyardee® and Red Fork® brand assetassets and $4.0 million in fiscal 20172018 for the impairment of our HK Anderson®, Red Fork®, and 2016, respectively, $31.4Salpica® brand


assets. Grocery & Snacks also recognized a $33.1 million in chargesgain on the sale of our Wesson® oil business in fiscal 20172019. Operating profit of the Grocery & Snacks segment included $1.0 million and $11.4 million of expenses in fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to the pending divestiture of the Wesson® oil business,acquisitions and divestitures and charges of $25.3$6.1 million and $51.8$14.1 million in connection with our restructuring plans in fiscal 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

Grocery & Snacks operating profit also included incremental cost of goods sold of $30.2 million due to the impact of writing inventory to fair value as part of our acquisition accounting for Pinnacle and the subsequent sale of that inventory.

Refrigerated & Frozen operating profit for fiscal 20172019 was $445.8$645.1 million, an increase of $25.4$165.7 million, or 6%35%, compared to fiscal 2016.2018. Gross profits were $24.7$216.4 million lowerhigher in fiscal 20172019 than in fiscal 2016,2018, driven by decreased sales volumes primarily associated with the transitory increase in the volumeaddition of Egg Beaters® in fiscal 2016, discussed above,Pinnacle and supply chain realized productivity, partially offset by the impact of lower commodityincreased input costs increased net pricing primarily as a result of reduced trade promotions, and improved plant productivity. SG&Atransportation inflation. Advertising and promotion expenses for fiscal 2019 decreased by $50.1$5.5 million in fiscal 2017, as compared to fiscal 2016, largely as a result of cost reductions achieved through our restructuring plans, as well as a $8.9 million reduction in advertising and promotion expenses.2018. Operating profit of the Refrigerated & Frozen segment included a gain of $23.1 million in fiscal 2019 related to the sale of our Italian-based frozen pasta business, Gelit, and incremental cost of goods sold of $21.9 million due to the impact of writing inventory to fair value as part of our acquisition accounting for Pinnacle and the subsequent sale of that inventory.

International operating profit for fiscal 2019 was $99.8 million, an increase of $13.3 million, or 15%, compared to fiscal 2018. Gross profits were $13.9 million higher in fiscal 2019 than in fiscal 2018, driven by the addition of Pinnacle. Included in the International segment fiscal 2019 operating profit was a gain of $13.2 million related to the sale of our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada, charges of $13.1 million for the impairment of our Aylmer® and Sundrop® brand assets, and charges of $2.9 million related to divestitures. In addition, operating profit was impacted by charges totaling approximately $7.7 million in fiscal 2017 related to a product recall, as well as charges of $6.2$4.9 million and $21.1$1.5 million in connection with our restructuring plans, in fiscal 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

International incurred an operating loss for fiscal 2017 of $168.9 million and earned an operating profit of $66.7 million in fiscal 2016. The operating loss in fiscal 2017 includes charges totaling $235.9 million for the impairment of goodwill and an intangible brand asset in our Canadian and Mexican operations. Gross profits were $8.5 million lower in fiscal 2017 than in fiscal 2016, driven by the impact of foreign exchange rates. Operating profits were negatively impacted by $9.9 million from the impact of foreign exchange rates in fiscal 2017 relative to fiscal 2016.

Foodservice operating profit for fiscal 20172019 was $105.1$134.3 million, an increase of $7.4$10.2 million, or 8%, compared to fiscal 2016.2018. Gross profits were $5.6$8.6 million lowerhigher in fiscal 20172019 than in fiscal 2016,2018, driven by volume declinesthe addition of Pinnacle and product supply shortfalls. This waschain realized productivity, partially offset by an inventory write-down inlower volume (including the sale of our Trenton, Missouri production facility) and higher input costs.

Pension and Postretirement Non-service Income

In fiscal 2016 at2019, pension and postretirement non-service income was $35.1 million, a foreign non-core popcorn business thatdecrease of $45.3 million compared to fiscal 2018. The decrease was primarily related to lower expected return on plan assets as we have since exited. Operating profit of the Foodservice segment was impacted by charges of $1.8 million in fiscal 2017 in connection withchanged our restructuring plans.

Commercial operating profit was $202.6 million in fiscal 2017 and $45.4 million in fiscal 2016. The Company sold the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, recognizing pre-tax gains totaling $197.4 million. The Spicetec and JM Swank businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations. There are no further operations in the Commercial segment.


investment strategy to more fixed income securities.

Interest Expense, Net

In fiscal 2017,2019, net interest expense was $195.5$391.4 million, a decreasean increase of $100.3$232.7 million, or 34%147%, from fiscal 2016.2018. The decrease reflectsincrease reflected the following:

the issuance of $7.025 billion aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes and borrowings of $1.30 billion under our unsecured term loan agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for a $650.0 million tranche of three-year term loans and a $650.0 million tranche of five-year term loans to the Company (the "Term Loan Agreement"), in each case in connection with the Pinnacle acquisition,

the repayment of a total of $900.0 million of our borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2019,

the borrowing of $300.0 million under our prior term loan agreement during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, which borrowing was subsequently repaid in connection with the Pinnacle acquisition,

the issuance of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes due 2020 during the second quarter of fiscal 2018,

the repayment of $70.0 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding senior notes in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, and

the repayment of $119.6 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding notes in the third quarter of fiscal 2018.

In addition, fiscal 2019 included $11.9 million related to the amortization of $2.15 billion, $550 million, and $473 million of debt in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, the first quarter of fiscal 2017, and the third quarter of fiscal 2017, respectively, as well as the exchange of $1.44 billion of debtcosts incurred to secure fully committed bridge financing in connection with the Spinoffthen-pending Pinnacle acquisition. The bridge financing was subsequently terminated in


connection with our incurrence of Lamb Weston duringpermanent financing to fund the second quarterPinnacle acquisition, and we recognized the remaining unamortized financing costs of 2017.

$33.8 million within SG&A expenses.

Income Taxes

Our income tax expense was $254.7$218.8 million and $46.4$174.6 million in fiscal 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was approximately 32%24% and 18% for fiscal 20172019 and 27%2018, respectively.

As a result of our off-calendar fiscal year end, the lower U.S. statutory federal income tax rate resulted in a blended U.S. federal statutory rate of 29.3% for the fiscal 2016.

year ended May 27, 2018.

The effective tax rate in fiscal 20172019 reflects the following:

additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill sold in connection with the divestitures of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,
additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill in our Mexican and Canadian businesses, for which an impairment charge was recognized,

the impact of legal entity reorganization resulting in a benefit related to undistributed foreign earnings for which the indefinite reinvestment assertion is no longer made,

an income

additional tax benefit forexpense on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings,

an adjustment of a valuation allowance associated with the plannedexpected capital gains from the divestiture of the Wesson® oil business,and Gelit businesses,

an income tax benefit for excess tax benefits allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our employees, beyond that which is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant, and
an income tax benefit associated with a tax planning strategy that allowed us to utilize certain state tax attributes and certain foreign incentives.

additional tax expense on non-deductible facilitative costs associated with the Pinnacle acquisition,

a benefit recognized due to the non-taxability of the novation of a legacy guarantee,

a benefit recognized due to a reduction in the fair value of equity awards subject to limitations on deductibility that were issued to Pinnacle executives as replacement awards at the time of the acquisition,

an increase to the deemed repatriation tax liability,

additional tax expense due to foreign and domestic restructuring, and

a state tax benefit from integration of the Pinnacle business.

The effective tax rate in fiscal 20162018 reflects the following:

the impact of the Tax Act,

additional tax expense related to legal entity changes for a business retained from the Private Brands

an adjustment of valuation allowance associated with the termination of the agreement for the proposed divestiture of our Wesson® oil business,

a charge for the prior year implementation of a new tax position, and

an indirect cost of the pension contribution made on February 26, 2018,

an income tax benefit of normal, recurring, income tax credits and deductions combined with a lower pre-tax level of earnings (due in large part to the impact of the write-off of $348.5 million of actuarial losses under our method of accounting for pension benefits).

additional expense related to the settlement of an audit of the impact of a law change in Mexico,

an income tax benefit allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our employees, beyond that which is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant, and

additional expense related to undistributed foreign earnings for which the indefinite reinvestment assertion is no longer made.

Equity Method Investment Earnings

We include our share of the earnings of certain affiliates based on our economic ownership interest in the affiliates. Our most significant affiliate is the Ardent Mills joint venture. Our share of earnings from our equity method investment earnings were $71.2$75.8 million and $66.1$97.3 million for fiscal 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The increases are reflectiveResults for fiscal 2019 included a gain of higher profits$15.1 million from the sale of an asset by the Ardent Mills joint venture due to more favorable wheat market conditions as well as improved operational effectiveness.venture. In addition, Ardent Mills earnings for fiscal 2019 reflected lower commodity margins and the timing of certain customer contracts that negatively impacted performance. A benefit of $4.3 million was included in the earnings of fiscal 2018 in connection with a gain on the substantial liquidation of an international joint venture.


Results of Discontinued Operations

Our discontinued operations generated after-tax income of $102.0 million in fiscal 2017 and an after-tax loss of $794.4$1.9 million and a gain of $14.3 million in fiscal 2016. Results reflected the operations of Lamb Weston through the date of its Spinoff in November 2016, as well as the results2019 and 2018, respectively. During fiscal 2018, a $14.5 million income tax benefit was recorded due to an adjustment of the Private Brands business prior to its divestiture inestimated deductibility of the second half of fiscal 2016. Wecosts incurred significant costs associated with effecting the Spinoff. These costs are included in resultsSpinoff of discontinued operations. We recognized a pre-tax charge of $1.92 billion ($1.44 billion after-tax) in fiscal 2016 to write down the goodwill and long-lived assets of the Private Brands business to the final sales price, less costs to sell, and to recognize the final loss.



Lamb Weston.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 20172019 were $1.46,$1.52, including earnings of $1.25 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.21 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Diluted loss per share in fiscal 2016 was $1.56, including earnings of $0.29$1.53 per diluted share from continuing operations and a loss of $1.85$0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2018 were $1.98, including earnings of $1.95 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.03 per diluted share from discontinued operations. See "Items Impacting Comparability"Comparability" above as several significant items affected the comparability of year-over-year results of operations.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Sources of Liquidity and Capital

The primary objective of our financing strategy is to maintain a prudent capital structure that provides us flexibility to pursue our growth objectives. If necessary, we use short-term debt principally to finance ongoing operations, including our seasonal requirements for working capital (accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and inventories, less accounts payable, accrued payroll, and other accrued liabilities), and a combination of equity and long-term debt to finance both our base working capital needs and our non-current assets. We are committed to maintaining ana solid investment grade credit rating.

At May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we had a revolving credit facility (the "Facility""Revolving Credit Facility") with a syndicate of financial institutions that providesproviding for a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.25$1.6 billion (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $1.75$2.1 billion with the consent of the lenders). We have historically used a credit facility principally as a back-up for our commercial paper program. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. On July 11, 2018, subsequent to

We had no amounts outstanding under our commercial paper program as of May 31, 2020 and May 26, 2019. The highest level of borrowings during fiscal year end, we entered into an amended and restated revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for a revolving credit facility in a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.6 billion (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $2.1 billion). It replaces the existing Facility and generally requires our ratio of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) to interest expense to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA to not exceed certain specified levels, with each ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis.

2020 was $145.0 million.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we repaid the remaining principal balance of $70.0 million of our 2.1% senior notes on the maturity date of March 15, 2018.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2018,2020, we entered into aan unsecured term loan agreement (the "Term Loan"Credit Agreement") with a financial institution. The Term LoanCredit Agreement provides for delayed draw term loans to the Company in an aggregate principal amount not in excess of $300.0 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we borrowed the full$600 million (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of the $300.0 million provided for$750 million). The Credit Agreement matures on May 21, 2023. As of May 31, 2020, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at, at the Company's election, either (a) LIBOR plus a percentage spread (ranging from 1.125% to 1.75%) based on the Company's senior unsecured long-term indebtedness ratings or (b) the alternate base rate, described in the Credit Agreement as the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%, plus a percentage spread (ranging from 0% to 0.625%) based on the Company's senior unsecured long-term indebtedness ratings and may be voluntarily prepaid, in whole or in part, without penalty, subject to certain conditions.

During fiscal 2020 we repaid the remaining $400.0 million outstanding principal balance of our borrowings under our $1.30 billion Term Loan Agreement. The proceeds from this borrowingPayments totaling $200.0 million each were used to make a voluntary pension plan contributionmade in the amountfirst and third quarters of $300.0 million.fiscal 2020 on our three-year tranche loans and our five-year tranche loans, respectively. The Term Loan Agreement matures on February 26, 2019. The term loan bears interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.75% per annum and is fully prepayable without penalty.

was terminated after these repayments.

During fiscal 2020 we also redeemed the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we repaid the remaining principal balance of $119.6 million of our 1.9% senior notes on the maturity date of January 25, 2018.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we repaid the remaining capital lease liability balance of $28.5 million in connection with the early exit of an unfavorable lease contract.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we issued $500.0entire outstanding $525.0 million aggregate principal amount of our floating rate notes due October 9, 2020. The notes bear interest at a rate equal22, 2020 in two separate redemptions totaling $250.0 million and $275.0 million in the third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, respectively.

We have $844.8 million of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months. We expect to three-month LIBOR plus 0.50% per annum.

As of May 27, 2018, we had $277.0 million outstanding undermaintain or have access to sufficient liquidity to retire or refinance long-term debt upon maturity, as market conditions warrant, from operating cash flows, our undrawn Credit Agreement, our commercial paper program. The highest level of borrowings during fiscal 2018 was $469.7 million. As of May 28, 2017,program, access to the capital markets, and our Revolving Credit Facility.


However, the disruption in the capital markets caused by the COVID-19 pandemic could make any refinancing more challenging and there can be no assurance that we had $26.2 million outstanding under our commercial paper program.

will be able to successfully refinance any debt on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

As of the end of fiscal 2018,2020, our senior long-term debt ratings were all investment grade. A significant downgrade in our credit ratings would not affect our ability to borrow amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility, although borrowing costs would increase. A downgrade of our short-term credit ratings would impact our ability to borrow under our commercial paper program by negatively impacting borrowing costs and causing shorter durations, as well as making access to commercial paper more difficult.



The Company has secured $9.0 billion in fully committed bridge financingdifficult, or impossible.

Our most restrictive covenants (the Revolving Credit Facility) generally require our ratio of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) to interest expense not be less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA not exceed certain decreasing specified levels, ranging from affiliates5.25 through the first quarter of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in connection with the Merger. The commitments under the committed bridge financing were subsequently reduced by the amounts of a term loan agreement we entered into on July 11, 2018 with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for term loansfiscal 2021 to us in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.3 billion. The funding under the term loan agreement is anticipated to occur simultaneously with the closing date of the acquisition. In connection with the merger, we expect to incur up to $8.3 billion of long-term debt (which includes any funding under the new term loan agreement), including for the payment of the cash portion of the merger consideration, the repayment of Pinnacle debt, the refinancing of certain Conagra debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses. The permanent financing is also expected to include approximately $600 million of incremental cash proceeds3.75 from the issuancesecond quarter of equity and/or divestitures.

fiscal 2023 and thereafter. Each ratio is to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis. As of May 31, 2020, we were in compliance with all financial covenants.

We repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. The share repurchase authorization has no expiration date.Board. Under the share repurchase authorization, we may repurchase our shares periodically over several years, depending on market conditions and other factors, and may do so in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. During fiscal 2018, we repurchased 27.4 million shares of our common stock under this authorization for an aggregate of $967.3 million. In May 2018, our Board of Directors approved an additional $1.0 billion of share repurchases. The Company's total remaining share repurchase authorization as of May 27, 2018, was $1.41 billion. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we suspended share repurchase activity in light of the pending acquisition of Pinnacle. The Company planshas no expiration date. We plan to repurchase shares under itsour authorized program only at times and in amounts as isare consistent with the prioritization of achieving itsour leverage targets.

Our total remaining share repurchase authorization as of May 31, 2020, was $1.41 billion.

On April 20, 2018, the16, 2020, we announced that our Board of Directorshad authorized a quarterly dividend payment of $0.2125 per share, which was paid on May 31, 2018June 3, 2020, to stockholdersshareholders of record as of the close of business on April 30, 2018.2020. Subject to market and other conditions and the approval of our Board, of Directors, we intend to maintain our quarterly dividend at the current annual rate of $0.85 per share during fiscal 2019. In the future, we expect modest dividend increases while we focus on deleveraging, subject to the approval of our Board of Directors.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we entered into an agreement to sell our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada to Bonduelle Group. The transaction was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, and was valued at approximately $43.0 million Canadian dollars, which was approximately $34.0 million U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the date of announcement.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we signed an agreement to sell our Wesson® oil business to Smucker for $285 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Conagra Brands and Smucker terminated the agreement. This outcome followed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission, announced on March 5, 2018, to challenge the pending transaction. The Company is still actively marketing the Wesson® oil business and expects to sell it within the next twelve months.
We have access to the $1.25 billion Facility, our commercial paper program, and the capital markets. We believe we also have access to additional bank loan facilities, if needed.
We expect to maintain or have access to sufficient liquidity to finance the cash portion of the merger consideration as well as to either retire or refinance senior debt upon maturity, as market conditions warrant, from operating cash flows, our commercial paper program, proceeds from any divestitures and other disposition transactions, access to capital markets, and our $1.25 billion Facility.
2021.

Cash Flows

In fiscal 2018,2020, we used $123.4generated $316.7 million of cash, which was the net result of $954.2 million$1.84 billion generated from operating activities, $576.2$153.8 million used in investing activities, $506.9 million$1.37 billion used in financing activities, and an increasea decrease of $5.5$1.7 million due to the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Cash generated from operating activities of continuing operations totaled $919.7 million$1.84 billion in fiscal 2018,2020, as compared to $1.14$1.11 billion generated in fiscal 2017. The decrease in operating cash flows was primarily the net result of increased pension plan payments and changes in working capital, offset by reduced income tax and interest payments. Pension plan payments mainly consisted of voluntary contributions totaling $300.0 million and $150.0 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. Year-over-year increases in receivables, higher inventory build, and payments made to terminate an unfavorable operating lease negatively impacted operating2019. Operating cash flows for fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017. Income tax payment reductions were driven by2020 reflected additional operating results from the acquisition of Pinnacle and the impact of corporate tax rate reductionsincreased sales from COVID-19 pandemic-related demand. The timing of the increased demand in the fourth quarter also created working capital favorability for fiscal 2020 driven primarily by the combination of decreased inventory levels and increased accounts payable balances resulting from longer supplier payment terms. We expect that a significant portion of this working capital favorability will reverse in fiscal 2021 as demand returns to more historic levels. In the Tax Act signed into law during the thirdfourth quarter of



fiscal 2018. Significant debt repayments during2020, we also improved working capital due to approximately $47 million in tax payments that were deferred until the first quarter of fiscal 2017 contributed to decreased2021 as a result of recent tax legislation. Despite the deferral of such tax payments, we still had $44.2 million of additional tax payments in the current year. The above working capital favorability was further offset by a $119.0 million increase in interest payments and the comparative impact of cash proceeds from the settlement of interest rate swaps in fiscal 2018. Payments related to incentive compensation and our restructuring plans were also reduced for fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017.
Cash generated2019 totaling $47.5 million. Lastly, we extended payment terms with certain Foodservice customers (ranging from operating activities of discontinued operations was $34.5 million and $34.7 million in fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively. This primarily reflects the activities15-30 days) as a result of the Lamb Weston business that was spun off on November 9, 2016 and,COVID-19 pandemic which partly gave rise to a lesser extent, other divested businesses. Operating cash flows of discontinued operationsan increase in fiscal 2017 were also impacted by expenses related to the Spinoff.
our accounts receivable at year-end.

Cash used in investing activities of continuing operations totaled $576.2$153.8 million in fiscal 20182020 compared to $65.6 million$5.17 billion in fiscal 2017.2019. Investing activities of continuing operations ofin fiscal 20182020 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $251.6totaling $369.5 million and the purchasesnet proceeds from divestitures totaling $194.6 million, including the sales of our DSD snacks and Lender's® bagel businesses. Investing activities in fiscal 2019 consisted primarily of the Sandwich Bros.purchase of WisconsinPinnacle for $5.12 billion, net of cash acquired, capital expenditures of $353.1 million, and proceeds from the divestiture of our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business, our Wesson® oil business, and Angie's Artisan Treats, LLCour Italian-based frozen pasta business, Gelit, for a totalcombined proceeds of $337.1$281.5 million, net of cash acquired. Investing activities of continuing operations in fiscal 2017 included the proceeds from the divestitures of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses totaling $489.0 million in the aggregate, partially offset by capital expenditures of $242.1 million, and acquisitions totaling $325.7 million, including the operating assets of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC, and the protein-based snacking businesses Thanasi Foods LLC and BIGS LLC.

Cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations in fiscal 2017 resulted primarily from capital expenditures.
Cash used for financing activities of continuing operations totaled $506.9 million in fiscal 2018 compared to $2.41 billion in fiscal 2017. Financing activities of continuing operations for fiscal 2018 consisted primarily of common stock repurchases of $967.3 million, net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $797.0 million, cash dividend payments of $342.3 million, long-term debt repayments totaling $242.3 million, and net short-term borrowings of $249.1 million. divested.

Cash used in financing activities of continuing operationstotaled $1.37 billion in fiscal 2017 reflected debt repayments of $1.06 billion, common stock repurchases totaling $1.0 billion, and dividends paid of $415.0 million, partially offset by employee stock option exercises and the issuance of other stock awards of $73.8 million.

Cash2020, compared to cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations$4.15 billion in fiscal 2019. Financing activities in fiscal 2020 consisted principally comprises borrowings by Lamb Weston which were transferredof the repayment of long-term debt totaling $947.5 million and cash dividends paid of $413.6 million. During fiscal 2019, in connection with the Spinoff.Pinnacle acquisition, we issued long-term debt that generated $8.31 billion in gross proceeds and issued common stock for net proceeds of $555.7 million.


This was reduced by debt issuance costs and bridge financing fees totaling $95.2 million. During fiscal 2019, we also repaid $3.97 billion of long-term debt, reduced our short-term borrowings mainly related to our commercial paper program by $277.3 million, and paid cash dividends of $356.2 million.

The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $128.0$553.3 million at May 27, 2018,31, 2020, and $251.4$236.6 million at May 28, 2017,26, 2019, of which $121.6$80.5 million at May 27, 2018,31, 2020, and $244.9$144.8 million at May 28, 2017,26, 2019, was held in foreign countries. DuringWe believe that our foreign subsidiaries have invested or will invest any undistributed earnings indefinitely, or that any undistributed earnings will be remitted in a tax-neutral transaction, and, therefore, do not provide deferred taxes on the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company repatriated $151.3 million of cash balances previously deemed to be permanently reinvested outside the U.S. Refer to Note 15 "Pre-tax Income and Income Taxes" to the consolidated financial statements contained in this report for more information related to this repatriation of cash and related adjustments to deferred tax liability, as well as the impacts of the Tax Act on remaining unremittedcumulative undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.

Our preliminary estimate of capital expenditures for fiscal 20192021 is approximately $350 million, excluding any incremental amounts resulting from the pending acquisition of Pinnacle.

$505 million.

Management believes that the Company's sourcesexisting cash balances, cash flows from operations, existing credit facilities, and access to capital markets will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our repayment of liquidity will be adequate finance the cash portiondebt, including any repayment of the merger consideration, to satisfydebt or refinancing of debt, working capital needs, repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time, make paymentsplanned capital expenditures, and payment of anticipated quarterly dividends complete planned capital expenditures, and make any required debt repayments, including by retiring or refinancing senior debt upon maturity (as market conditions warrant), for at least the foreseeable future.


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We use off-balance sheet arrangements (e.g., leases accounted for as operating leases) where sound business principles warrant their use. We also periodically enter into guarantees and other similar arrangements as part of transactions in the ordinary course of business. These are described further in "Obligations and Commitments," below.
Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated
We lease or leased certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased. The lease agreements also contain contingent put options (the "lease put options") that allow or allowed the lessors to require us to purchase the buildings at the greater of original construction cost, or fair market value, without a lease agreement in place (the "put price") in certain limited circumstances. As a result of substantial impairment charges related to our divested Private Brands operations, these


lease put options became exercisable. During fiscal 2016, we entered into a series of related transactions in which we exchanged a warehouse we owned in Indiana for two buildings and parcels of land that we leased as part of our Omaha corporate offices. Concurrent with the asset exchange, the leases on the two Omaha corporate buildings, which were subject to contingent put options, were canceled. We recognized aggregate charges of $55.6 million for the early termination of these leases. We also entered into a lease for the warehouse in Indiana and we recorded a financing lease obligation of $74.2 million. During fiscal 2017, one of these lease agreements expired. As a result of this expiration, we reversed the applicable accrual and recognized a benefit of $6.7 million in SG&A expenses. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we purchased two buildings that were subject to lease put options and recognized net losses totaling $48.2 million for the early exit of unfavorable lease contracts.
As of May 27, 2018, there was one remaining leased building subject to a lease put option for which the put option price exceeded the estimated fair value of the property by $8.2 million, of which we had accrued $1.2 million. We are amortizing the difference between the put price and the estimated fair value (without a lease agreement in place) of the property over the remaining lease term within SG&A expenses. This lease is accounted for as an operating lease, and accordingly, there are no material assets and liabilities, other than the accrued portion of the put price, associated with this entity included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this entity. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreement, the expected remaining useful life of the asset leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entity.

next twelve months.

OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future payments under contracts such as lease agreements, debt agreements, and unconditional purchase obligations (i.e., obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices, such as "take-or-pay" contracts). The unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into in our normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available. Of these items, debt, notes payable, and capitalfinance lease obligations, which totaled $3.80 billion as of May 27, 2018,and operating lease obligations were recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations, which totaled $1.26 billionSheets contained in this report as of May 27, 2018, were not recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP").

31, 2020.

A summary of our contractual obligations as of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, was as follows:

 

 

Payments Due by Period

(in millions)

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Total

 

 

Less than

1 Year

 

 

1-3 Years

 

 

3-5 Years

 

 

More Than

5 Years

 

Long-term debt

 

$

9,631.6

 

 

$

822.5

 

 

$

2,287.0

 

 

$

1,000.1

 

 

$

5,522.0

 

Finance lease obligations

 

 

155.1

 

 

 

22.2

 

 

 

39.4

 

 

 

28.7

 

 

 

64.8

 

Operating lease obligations

 

 

297.9

 

 

 

53.0

 

 

 

78.6

 

 

 

47.7

 

 

 

118.6

 

Purchase obligations1 and other contracts

 

 

1,406.7

 

 

 

1,122.8

 

 

 

183.3

 

 

 

63.5

 

 

 

37.1

 

Notes payable

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

11,492.4

 

 

$

2,021.6

 

 

$

2,588.3

 

 

$

1,140.0

 

 

$

5,742.5

 

 
Payments Due by Period
(in millions)
Contractual ObligationsTotal 
Less than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
After 5
Years
Long-term debt$3,431.7
 $300.0
 $822.6
 $1,087.0
 $1,222.1
Capital lease obligations94.7
 7.1
 13.5
 13.5
 60.6
Operating lease obligations199.1
 35.6
 47.5
 33.7
 82.3
Purchase obligations1 and other contracts
1,127.0
 966.7
 121.3
 37.6
 1.4
Notes payable277.3
 277.3
 
 
 
Total$5,129.8
 $1,586.7
 $1,004.9
 $1,171.8
 $1,366.4

1Amount includes open purchase orders and agreements, some of which are not legally binding and/or may be cancellable. Such agreements are generally settleable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year.

Purchase obligations and other contracts, which totaled $1.38 billion as of May 31, 2020, were not recognized as liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets contained in this report, in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

We are also contractually obligated to pay interest on our long-term debt and capitalfinance lease obligations. The weighted-average coupon interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of May 27, 2018,31, 2020 was approximately 4.9%4.8%.

The operating lease obligations noted in the table above have not been reduced by non-cancellable sublease rentals of $0.5$5.9 million.

As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we had aggregate unfunded pension and postretirement benefit obligations totaling $68.5 million. This amount is$52.1 million and $86.4 million, respectively. Our unfunded pension obligation decreased by $79.6 million in fiscal 2020 primarily due to lump-sum payments to plan participants and actual return on plan assets exceeding expected returns, principally on fixed income securities. These amounts are not included in the table above. Inabove as the fourth quarterunfunded obligations are remeasured each fiscal year, thereby resulting in our inability to accurately predict the ultimate amount and timing of fiscal 2018, we made a voluntary pension plan contribution in the amount of $300.0 million. We do not expectany future required contributions to be required to make additional payments to fund these amounts in the foreseeable future.such plans. Based on current statutory requirements, we are not obligated to fund any amount to our qualified pension plans during the next



twelve months. We estimate that we will make payments of approximately $19.6$32.2 million and $10.0 million over the next twelve months to fund our pension plans.and postretirement plans, respectively. See Note 1918 "Pension and Postretirement Benefits" to the consolidated financial statements and "Critical Accounting Estimates - Employment Related– Employment-Related Benefits" contained in this report for further discussion of our pension obligations and factors that could affect estimates of this liability.


As part of our ongoing operations, we also enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event (e.g., guarantees of debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform). In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. A summary of our commitments, including commitments associated with equity method investments, as of May 27, 2018, was as follows:

 
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
(in millions)
Other Commercial CommitmentsTotal 
Less than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
After 5
Years
Standby repurchase obligations$0.9
 $0.6
 $0.3
 $
 $
Other commitments6.1
 4.1
 2.0
 
 
Total$7.0
 $4.7
 $2.3
 $
 $
In addition to the commitments included in the table above, asevent. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we had $32.4$52.2 million of standby letters of credit issued on our behalf. These standby letters of credit are primarily related to our self-insured workers compensation programs and are not reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. We guarantee certain leases resulting from the divestiture of the JM Swank business completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, the remaining terms of these arrangements dodid not exceed fivethree years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $2.6$0.6 million. In addition, we guarantee a certain lease resulting from an exited facility. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, the remaining term of this arrangement doesdid not exceed nineseven years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $21.7$16.5 million.

In certain limited situations, we

We also guarantee obligationsan obligation of the Lamb Weston business pursuant to a guarantee arrangementsarrangement that existed prior to the Spinoff and remained in place following completion of the Spinoff until such guarantee obligations areobligation is substituted for guarantees issued by Lamb Weston. Such guarantee arrangements are described below. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016 (the "Separation Agreement"), between us and Lamb Weston, thesethis guarantee arrangements arearrangement is deemed liabilitiesa liability of Lamb Weston that werewas transferred to Lamb Weston as part of the Spinoff. Accordingly, in the event that we are required to make any payments as a result of thesethis guarantee arrangements,arrangement, Lamb Weston is obligated to indemnify us for any such liability, reduced by any insurance proceeds received by us, in accordance with the terms of the indemnification provisions under the Separation Agreement.

Lamb Weston is a party to a warehouse services agreement with a third-party warehouse provider through July 2035. Under this agreement, Lamb Weston is required to make payments for warehouse services based on the quantity of goods stored and other service factors. We have guaranteed the warehouse provider that we will make the payments required under the agreement in the event that Lamb Weston fails to perform. Minimum payments of $1.5 million per month are required under this agreement. It is not possible to determine the maximum amount of the payment obligations under this agreement. Upon completion of the Spinoff, we recognized a liability for the estimated fair value of this guarantee. As of May 27, 2018, the amount of this guarantee, recorded in other noncurrent liabilities, was $28.1 million.
Lamb Weston is a party to an agricultural sublease agreement with a third party for certain farmland through 2020 (subject, at Lamb Weston's option, to extension for two additional five-year periods). Under the terms of the sublease agreement, Lamb Weston is required to make certain rental payments to the sublessor. We have guaranteed Lamb Weston's performance and the payment of all amounts (including indemnification obligations) owed by Lamb Weston under the sublease agreement, up to a maximum of $75.0 million. We believe the farmland associated with this sublease agreement is readily marketable for lease to other area farming operators. As such, we believe that any financial exposure to the company, in the event that we were required to perform under the guaranty, would be largely mitigated.

The obligations and commitments tables above do not include any reserves for uncertainties in income taxes, as we are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of our reserves for income taxes. The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at May 27, 2018,31, 2020 was $32.5$35.8 million. The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at May 27,



2018,31, 2020, that, if recognized, would favorably impact our effective tax rate was $27.8$30.3 million. Recognition of these tax benefits would have a favorable impact on our effective tax rate.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The process of preparing financial statements requires the use of estimates on the part of management. The estimates used by management are based on our historical experiences combined with management's understanding of current facts and circumstances. Certain of our accounting estimates are considered critical as they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and require significant or complex judgment on the part of management. The following is a summary of certain accounting estimates considered critical by management.

Our Audit/Finance Committee has reviewed management's development, selection, and disclosure of the critical accounting estimates.

Marketing Costs—We incur certainoffer various forms of trade promotions which are mostly recorded as a reduction in revenue. The methodologies for determining these provisions are dependent on local customer pricing and promotional practices, which range from contractually fixed percentage price reductions to provisions based on actual occurrence or performance. Our promotional activities are conducted either through the retail trade or directly with consumers and included activities such as in-store displays and events, feature price discounts, consumer coupons, and loyalty programs. The costs to promote our products through marketing programs, which include advertising, customer incentives, and consumer incentives. We recognize the cost of each of these typesactivities are recognized as a reduction of marketing activities as incurred in accordance with U.S. GAAP.revenue at the time the related revenue is recorded, which normally precedes the actual cash expenditure. The recognition of these costs therefore requires management judgment required in determining marketing costs can be significant. For volume-based incentives provided to customers, management must continually assessregarding the likelihoodvolume of the customer achieving the specified targets. Similarly, for consumer coupons, management must estimate the level at which couponspromotional offers that will be redeemed by consumerseither the retail trade or consumer. These estimates are made using various techniques including historical data on performance of similar promotional programs. Differences between estimated expense and actual redemptions are recognized as a change in the future. Estimates made by management estimate in accounting for marketing costs are based primarily on our historical experience with marketing programs with consideration given to current circumstances and industry trends. As these factors change, management's estimates could change and we could recognize different amounts of marketing costs over different periods of time.

a subsequent period.

We have recognized reservestrade promotion liabilities of $100.5$165.6 million for these marketing costs as of May 27, 2018.31, 2020. Changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual customer marketing program(including amounts classified as a revenue reduction) would not result in a material change in our results of operations or cash flows.

Advertising and promotion expenses totaled $278.6 million, $328.3 million, and $347.2 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Income Taxes—Our income tax expense is based on our income, statutory tax rates, and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the


taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in determining our income tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions, including evaluating uncertainties. Management reviews tax positions at least quarterly and adjusts the balances as new information becomes available. Deferred income tax assets represent amounts available to reduce income taxes payable on taxable income in future years. Such assets arise because of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in our consolidated balance sheets, as well as from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Management evaluates the recoverability of these future tax deductions by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings, and available tax planning strategies. These estimates of future taxable income inherently require significant judgment. Management uses historical experience and short and long-range business forecasts to develop such estimates. Further, we employ various prudent and feasible tax planning strategies to facilitate the recoverability of future deductions. To the extent management does not consider it more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be recovered, a valuation allowance is established.

Further information on income taxes is provided in Note 15 14 "Pre-tax Income and Income Taxes" to the consolidated financial statements.

statements contained in this report.

Environmental Liabilities—Environmental liabilities are accrued when it is probable that obligations have been incurred and the associated amounts can be reasonably estimated. Management works with independent third-party specialists in order to effectively assess our environmental liabilities. Management estimates our environmental liabilities based on evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, our known volumetric contribution, other potentially responsible parties, and our experience in remediating sites. Environmental liability estimates may be affected by changing governmental or other external determinations of what constitutes an environmental liability or an acceptable level of clean-up. Management's estimate as to our potential liability is independent of any potential recovery of insurance proceeds or indemnification arrangements. Insurance companies and other indemnitors are notified of any potential claims and periodically updated as to the general status of known claims. We do not discount our environmental liabilities as the timing of the anticipated cash



payments is not fixed or readily determinable. To the extent that there are changes in the evaluation factors identified above, management's estimate of environmental liabilities may also change.

We have recognized a reserve of approximately $57.8$63.7 million for environmental liabilities as of May 27, 2018.31, 2020. The reserve for each site is determined based on an assessment of the most likely required remedy and a related estimate of the costs required to effect such remedy.

Employment-Related Benefits—We incur certain employment-related expenses associated with pensions, postretirement health care benefits, and workers' compensation. In order to measure the annual expense associated with these employment-related benefits, management must make a variety of estimates including, but not limited to, discount rates used to measure the present value of certain liabilities, assumed rates of return on assets set aside to fund these expenses, compensation increases, employee turnover rates, anticipated mortality rates, anticipated health care costs, and employee accidents incurred but not yet reported to us. The estimates used by management are based on our historical experience as well as current facts and circumstances. We use third-party specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the expense associated with these employment-related benefits. Different estimates used by management could result in us recognizing different amounts of expense over different periods of time.

Beginning in fiscal 2017, the

The Company has elected to useuses a split discount rate (the "spot-rate approach") for the U.S. plans and certain foreign plans. Historically, a single weighted-average discount rate was used in the calculation of service and interest costs, both of which are components of pension benefit costs. The spot-rate approach applies separate discount rates for each projected benefit payment in the calculation of pension service and interest cost. This change is considered a change in accounting estimate and has been applied prospectively. The pre-tax reduction in total pension benefit cost associated with this change in fiscal 2017 was approximately $27.0 million.

We have recognized a pension liability of $171.5$254.5 million and $582.2$192.9 million, a postretirement liability of $118.2$89.3 million and $156.9$90.6 million, and a workers' compensation liability of $39.4$55.5 million and $41.5$61.1 million, as of the end of fiscal 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. We also have recognized a pension asset of $103.0$202.4 million and $17.1$61.2 million as of the end of fiscal 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively, as certain individual plans of the Company had a positive funded status.

We recognize cumulative changes in the fair value of pension plan assets and net actuarial gains or losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the fair value of plan assets or the plan's projected benefit obligation ("the corridor") in current period expense annually as of our measurement date, which is our fiscal year-end, or when measurement is required otherwise under U.S. GAAP.

generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP").

We recognized pension expense (benefit), including activities of discontinued operations, from Company plans of $(56.1)$5.9 million, $(12.9)$(22.7) million, and $370.8$(56.1) million in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. Such amounts reflect the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability of $3.4$44.8 million, $1.2$5.1 million, and $348.5$3.4 million in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. This also reflected


expected returns on plan assets of $218.3$170.2 million, $207.4$174.4 million, and $259.9$218.3 million in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. We contributed $312.6$17.5 million, $163.0$14.7 million, and $11.5$312.6 million to the pension plans of our continuing operations in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. We anticipate contributing approximately $19.6$32.2 million to our pension plans in fiscal 2019.

2021.

One significant assumption for pension plan accounting is the discount rate. Historically, we have selected a discount rate each year (as of our fiscal year-end measurement date) for our plans based upon a high-quality corporate bond yield curve for which the cash flows from coupons and maturities match the year-by-year projected benefit cash flows for our pension plans. The corporate bond yield curve is comprised of high-quality fixed income debt instruments (usually Moody's Aa) available at the measurement date. At May 29, 2016, the Company changed toWe use a spot-rate approach, discussed above.  This alternative approach focuses on measuring the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost by using individual spot rates derived from a high-quality corporate bond yield curve and matched with separate cash flows for each future year instead of a single weighted-average discount rate approach.

Based on this information, the discount rate selected by us for determination of pension expense was 3.88% for fiscal 2020, 4.15% for fiscal 2019, and 3.90% for fiscal 2018, 3.83% for fiscal 2017, and 4.10% for fiscal 2016.2018. We selected a weighted-average discount rate of 4.21%3.35% and 3.83%2.30% for determination of service and interest expense, respectively, for fiscal 2019.2021. A 25 basis point increase in our discount rate assumption as of the end of fiscal 20182020 would have resulted in an increase of $3.9$5.1 million in our pension expense for fiscal 2018.2020. A 25 basis point decrease in our discount rate assumption as of the end of fiscal 20182020 would have resulted in ana decrease of $3.0$5.5 million in our pension expense for fiscal 2018.2020. For our year-end pension obligation determination, we selected discount rates of 4.14%2.98% and 3.90%3.88% for fiscal years 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.



Another significant assumption used to account for our pension plans is the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. In developing the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets for determining pension expense, we consider long-term historical returns (arithmetic average) of the plan's investments, the asset allocation among types of investments, estimated long-term returns by investment type from external sources, and the current economic environment. Based on this information, we selected 7.50%4.77% for the weighted-average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for determining our fiscal 20182020 pension expense. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our weighted-average expected long-term rate of return assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2020 would decrease/increase annual pension expense for our pension plans by $8.8 million. We selected a weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets of 3.74% to be used to determine our pension expense for fiscal 2021. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our expected long-term rate of return assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 20182021 would decrease/increase annual pension expense for our pension plans by $7.3$9.3 million.

During fiscal 2018, we approved an amendment of our salaried and non-qualified pension plans. The amendment froze the compensation and service periods used to calculate pension benefits for active employees who participate in those plans. As a result of this amendment, we have changed our salaried and non-qualified pension asset investment strategy to align our related pension plan assets with our projected benefit obligation to reduce volatility. We selected a weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets of 5.17% to be used to determine our pension expense for fiscal 2019. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our expected long-term rate of return assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2019 would decrease/increase annual pension expense for our pension plans by $8.2 million.

The rate of compensation increase is another significant assumption used in the development of accounting information for pension plans. Due to the amendment discussed above, this assumption is no longer applicable for any of our pension plans in fiscal 2019 and thereafter. We selected 3.63% for the rate of compensation increase for determination of pension expense for fiscal year 2018, 3.66% for fiscal 2017, and 3.70% for fiscal 2016. A 25 basis point increase in our rate of compensation increase assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2018 would increase pension expense for our pension plans by $0.5 million for the year. A 25 basis point decrease in our rate of compensation increase assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2018 would decrease pension expense for our pension plans by $0.5 million for the year.
In October 2016, The Society of Actuaries' Retirement Plan Experience Committee published updated mortality improvement scales and recommended their use with base mortality tables for the measurement of U.S. pension plan obligations. With the assistance of our third-party actuary, in measuring our pension obligations as of May 28, 2017, we incorporated a revised improvement scale to be used with our current base mortality tables that generally reflect the mortality improvement inherent in these new tables.

During 2018, we conducted a mortality experience study and, with the assistance of our third-party actuary, adopted new company-specific mortality tables used in measuring our pension obligations as of May 27, 2018. In addition, we incorporated a revised mortality improvement scale to be used with the new company-specific mortality tables that reflects the mortality improvement inherent in these tables.

We also provide certain postretirement health care benefits. We recognized postretirement benefit expense (benefit) of $0.7$(4.2) million, $(1.2)$(1.3) million, and $0.2$0.7 million in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016, respectively. We reflected liabilities of $118.2 million and $156.9 million in our balance sheets as of May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017, respectively. We anticipate contributing approximately $16.2$10.0 million to our postretirement health care plans in fiscal 2019.

2021.

The postretirement benefit expense and obligation are also dependent on our assumptions used for the actuarially determined amounts. These assumptions include discount rates (discussed above), health care cost trend rates, inflation rates, retirement rates, mortality rates (also discussed above), and other factors. The health care cost trend assumptions are developed based on historical cost data, the near-term outlook, and an assessment of likely long-term trends. Assumed inflation rates are based on an evaluation of external market indicators. Retirement and mortality rates are based primarily on actual plan experience. The discount rate we selected for determination of postretirement expense was 3.48% for fiscal 2020, 3.81% for fiscal 2019, and 3.33% for fiscal 2018, 3.18% for fiscal 2017, and 3.50% for fiscal 2016.2018. We have selected a weighted-average discount rate of 3.81%2.39% for determination of postretirement expense for fiscal 2019.2021. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our discount rate assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2018 would not have resulted in a material change to postretirement expense for our plans. We have assumed the initial year increase in cost of health care to be 7.87%6.22%, with the trend rate decreasing to 4.5%4.43% by 2024. A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:

($ in millions) 
One Percent
Increase
 
One Percent
Decrease

 

One Percent

Increase

 

 

One Percent

Decrease

 

Effect on total service and interest cost $0.3
 $(0.3)

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

(0.1

)

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation 3.9
 (3.5)

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

(1.4

)



We provide workers' compensation benefits to our employees. The measurement of the liability for our cost of providing these benefits is largely based upon actuarial analysis of costs. One significant assumption we make is the discount rate used to calculate the present value of our obligation. The weighted-average discount rate used at May 27, 201831, 2020 was 2.88%2.11%. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in the discount rate assumption would not have a material impact on workers' compensation expense or the liability.

Business Combinations, Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (including property, plant and equipment), Identifiable Intangible Assets, and Goodwill—We use the acquisition method in accounting for acquired businesses. Under the acquisition method, our financial statements reflect the operations of an acquired business starting from the closing of the acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Significant judgment is often required in estimating the fair value of assets acquired, particularly intangible assets. As a result, in the case of significant acquisitions we normally obtain the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist in estimating fair values of tangible and intangible assets. The fair value estimates are based on available historical information and on expectations and assumptions about the future, considering the perspective of marketplace participants. While management believes those expectations and assumptions are reasonable, they are inherently uncertain. Unanticipated market or macroeconomic events and circumstances may occur, which could affect the accuracy or validity of the estimates and assumptions.

We reduce the carrying amounts of long-lived assets (including property, plant and equipment) to their fair values when their carrying amount is determined to not be recoverable.  We generally compare undiscounted estimated future cash flows of an asset or asset group to the carrying values of the asset or asset group.  If the undiscounted estimated future cash flows exceed the carrying values of the asset or asset group, no impairment is recognized.  If the undiscounted estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying values of the asset or asset group, we write-down the asset or assets to their estimated fair values.  The estimates of fair value are generally in the form of appraisal, or by discounting estimated future cash flows of the asset or asset group.

Determining the useful lives of intangible assets also requires management judgment. Certain brand intangibles are expected to have indefinite lives based on their history and our plans to continue to support and build the acquired brands, while other acquired intangible assets (e.g., customer relationships) are expected to have determinable useful lives. Our estimates of the useful lives of definite-lived intangible assets are primarily based upon historical experience, the competitive and macroeconomic environment, and our operating plans. The costs of definite-lived intangibles are amortized to expense over their estimated life.

We reduce the carrying amounts of indefinite-lived intangible assets, and goodwill to their fair values when the fair value of such assets is determined to be less than their carrying amounts (i.e., assets are deemed to be impaired). Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires us to estimate the future cash flows anticipated to be generated by the particular asset being tested for impairment as well as to select a discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. When determining future cash flow estimates, we consider historical results adjusted to reflect current and anticipated operating conditions. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment by management in such areas as future economic conditions, industry-specific conditions, product pricing, and necessary capital expenditures. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows could produce different impairment amounts (or none at all) for long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets.

In assessing other intangible assets not subject to amortization for impairment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. If we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, then we are not required to perform any additional tests for assessing intangible assets for impairment. However, if we conclude otherwise or elect not to perform the qualitative assessment, then we are required to perform a quantitative impairment test that involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

If we perform a quantitative impairment test in evaluating impairment of our indefinite lived brands/trademarks, we utilize a "relief from royalty" methodology. The methodology determines the fair value of each brand through use of a discounted cash flow model that incorporates an estimated "royalty rate" we would be able to charge a third party for the use of the particular brand. When determining the future cash flow estimates, we must estimate future net sales and a fair market royalty rate for each applicable brand and an appropriate discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows.



Estimating future net sales requires significant judgment by management in such areas as future economic conditions, product pricing, and consumer trends. In determining an appropriate discount rate to apply to the estimated future cash flows, we consider the current interest rate environment and our estimated cost of capital.

Goodwill is tested annually for impairment of value and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment


has occurred. Such indicators may include deterioration in general economic conditions, adverse changes in the markets in which an entity operates, increases in input costs that have negative effects on earnings and cash flows, or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods, among others. The fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill.

In testing goodwill for impairment, we have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (more than 50%) that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we elect to perform a qualitative assessment and determine that an impairment is more likely than not, we are then required to perform a quantitative impairment test, otherwise no further analysis is required. We also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test.

Under the qualitative assessment, various events and circumstances that would affect the estimated fair value of a reporting unit are identified (similar to impairment indicators above). Furthermore, management considers the results of the most recent two-step quantitative impairment test completed for a reporting unit and compares the weighted average cost of capital between the current and prior years for each reporting unit.

Under the quantitative impairment test, the evaluation involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires us to estimate the future cash flows anticipated to be generated by the reporting unit being tested for impairment as well as to select a risk-adjusted discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. When determining future cash flow estimates, we consider historical results adjusted to reflect current and anticipated operating conditions. We estimate cash flows for the reporting unit over a discrete period (typically four or five years) and the terminal period (considering expected long term growth rates and trends). Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment by management in such areas as future economic conditions, industry-specific conditions, product pricing, and necessary capital expenditures. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows or significant changes in risk-adjusted discount rates due to changes in market conditions could produce substantially different estimates of the fair value of the reporting unit.

Prior to the fourth quarter

As of fiscal 2017, if the carrying valueMay 31, 2020, we have goodwill of a reporting unit exceeded its fair value, we completed a second step$11.44 billion, indefinite-lived intangibles of the test to determine the$3.40 billion and definite-lived intangibles of $919.6 million. The amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any, to be recognized. In the second step, we estimated an implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets). The impairment loss was equal to the excess of the carrying value of the goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. Asintangibles increased significantly during fiscal 2019 as a result of adopting Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and estimated fair value of the reporting unit.

Pinnacle acquisition. In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, in anticipation of the Spinoff,2020, we changedreorganized our reporting segments. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we were requiredsegments to determine newincorporate the Pinnacle business into our legacy reporting units at a lower level (atsegments, to reflect how the operating segment or one level lower, as applicable). When such a determination was made, we were required to perform a goodwill impairment analysis for each of the old and new reporting units.
business is now being managed. We performed an assessment of impairment oftested goodwill for impairment both prior to and subsequent to the new Canadian reporting unit withinreallocation of Pinnacle goodwill and there were no impairments of goodwill.  

Historically, we have experienced impairments in brand intangibles and goodwill as a result of declining sales and other economic conditions. For instance, in fiscal 2020, we recorded total intangibles impairments of $165.5 million, primarily related to our recently acquired Pinnacle brands. In fiscal 2019, we recorded total intangibles impairments of $89.6 million, primarily related to our Chef Boyardee® brand intangible.  

With the new International reporting segment. Estimating theaddition of Pinnacle intangibles that were recorded at fair value in the prior year, we continue to be more susceptible to impairment charges in the future if our long-term sales forecasts, royalty rates, and other assumptions change as a result of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans and future industry andlower than expected performance or other economic conditions. We estimatedwill monitor these assumptions as management continues to achieve expected synergies, gross margin improvement, and long-term sales growth on certain key brands acquired in the future cash flowsacquisition including, but not limited to, Birds Eye®, Duncan Hines®, and Gardein®.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU 2016-13"), to update the Canadian reporting unitmethodology used to measure current expected credit losses ("CECL"). This ASU applies to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, net investments in leases, and calculatedtrade accounts receivable as well as certain off-balance sheet credit exposures, such as loan commitments. This ASU replaces the net present valuecurrent incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology to reflect CECL and requires consideration of those estimated cash flowsa broader range of reasonable and supportable information to explain credit loss estimates. The guidance must be adopted using a risk adjusted discount ratemodified retrospective transition method through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in order to estimate the fair valueperiod of each reporting unit from the perspective of a market participant. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 7.5% and 2%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying valueadoption. This ASU will be effective beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly,



during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $139.2 million for the impairment of goodwill. The remaining goodwill balance of the Canadian reporting unit as of May 27, 2018 was $37.6 million.
As part of the assessment of the fair value of each asset and liability within the Canadian reporting unit, with the assistance of the third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of a Canadian brand to be less than its carrying value. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we recognized an impairment charge of $24.4 million to write down the intangible asset to its estimated fair value.
We also performed an assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit within the International reporting segment using similar methods to those described above. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We determined that the estimated fair value of this reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of its net assets by approximately 5%. Accordingly, we did not recognize an impairment of the goodwill in the Mexican reporting unit.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, as a result of further deterioration in forecasted sales and profits primarily due to foreign exchange rates, we performed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value in the second quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly, during the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $43.9 million for the impairment of goodwill.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, in conjunction with our annual impairment testing, we adopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. As a result of further deterioration in forecasted sales and profits, we performed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 9.0% and 3.0%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the reporting unit. We recognized an impairment charge of $15.8 million, equal to the difference between the carrying value and estimated fair value of the reporting unit. The remaining goodwill balance of the Mexican reporting unit as of May 27, 2018 was $118.5 million.
In fiscal 2018, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles. During fiscal 2018, we recognized impairment charges of $4.0 million for our HK Anderson®, Red Fork®, and Salpica® brands in our Grocery & Snacks segment. We also recognized an impairment charge of $0.8 million for our Aylmer® brand in our International segment.
In fiscal 2017, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles. During fiscal 2017, we recognized impairment charges of $7.1 million for our Del Monte®brand and $5.5 million for our Aylmer® brand in our International segment. We also recognized impairment charges of $67.1 million for our Chef Boyardee® brand and $1.1 million for our Fiddle Faddle® brand in our Grocery & Snacks segment.
In fiscal 2016, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles. During fiscal 2016, we recognized impairment charges of $50.1 million in our Grocery & Snacks segment for our Chef Boyardee® brand.
We completed the divestiture of our Private Brands operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2016, we recognized charges of $1.92 billion ($1.44 billion after-tax) to write-down the goodwill and long-lived assets of the Private Brands business.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. On July 9, 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year. The updated


standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Based on the FASB's ASU, we will apply the new revenue standard in our fiscal year 2019. Entities will have the option to adopt the ASU using either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. We have concluded our assessment of the new standard and will be adopting the provisions of the ASU utilizing the modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The effective date for this standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017.2021. We do not expect ASU 2016-012016-13 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, Topic 842, which requires lessees to reflect most leases on their balance sheet as assets and obligations. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the effect that this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard is to be applied under the modified retrospective method, with elective reliefs, which requires application of the new guidance for all periods presented.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash, which provides amendments to current guidance to address the classifications and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-18 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which provides a new framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires companies to present the service cost component of net benefit cost in the same line items in which they report compensation cost. Companies will present all other components of net benefit cost outside a subtotal of operating income, if presented, or disclosed separately. Also, only the service cost component may be eligible for capitalization where applicable. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively for the capitalization of service cost components. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We will adopt ASU 2017-07 in our fiscal 2019. The estimated impact is a reclassification of a benefit of $80.4 million, a benefit of $55.2 million, and a charge of $303.8 million to non-operating income (expense) for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements and make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current U.S. GAAP. The amendments in this update better align an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and presentation of hedge results. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We plan to early adopt this ASU at the beginning of our fiscal 2019. We do not expect ASU 2017-12 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The principal market risks affecting us during fiscal 20182020 and 20172019 were exposures to price fluctuations of commodity and energy inputs, interest rates, and foreign currencies.



Commodity Market Risk

We purchase commodity inputs such as wheat, corn, oats, soybean meal, soybean oil, meat, dairy products, nuts, sugar, natural gas, electricity, and packaging materials to be used in our operations. These commodities are subject to price fluctuations that may create price risk. We enter into commodity hedges to manage this price risk using physical forward contracts or derivative instruments. We have policies governing the hedging instruments our businesses may use. These policies include limiting the dollar risk exposure for each of our businesses. We also monitor the amount of associated counter-party credit risk for all non-exchange-traded transactions.

Interest Rate Risk

We may use interest rate swaps to manage the effect of interest rate changes on the fair value of our existing debt as well as the forecasted interest payments for the anticipated issuance of debt.

As of May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 2017,26, 2019, the fair value of our long-term debt (including current installments) was estimated at $3.76$11.35 billion and $3.32$11.24 billion, respectively, based on current market rates. As of May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 2017,26, 2019, a 1% increase in interest rates would decrease the fair value of our fixed rate debt by approximately $168.1$704.8 million and $197.8$637.7 million, respectively, while a 1% decrease in interest rates would increase the fair value of our fixed rate debt by approximately $185.7$809.5 million and $219.4$724.7 million, respectively.

Foreign Currency Risk

In order to reduce exposures for our processing activities related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we may enter into forward exchange or option contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency for certain of our operations. This activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities.

Value-at-Risk (VaR)

We employ various tools to monitor our derivative risk, including value-at-risk ("VaR") models. We perform simulations using historical data to estimate potential losses in the fair value of current derivative positions. We use price and volatility information for the prior 90 days in the calculation of VaR that is used to monitor our daily risk. The purpose of this measurement is to provide a single view of the potential risk of loss associated with derivative positions at a given point in time based on recent changes in market prices. Our model uses a 95% confidence level. Accordingly, in any given one dayone-day time period, losses greater than the amounts included in the table below are expected to occur only 5% of the time. We include commodity swaps, futures, and options and foreign exchange forwards, swaps, and options in this calculation. The following table provides an overview of our average daily VaR for our energy, agriculture, and foreign exchange positions (including discontinued operations) for fiscal 20182020 and 2017.2019.

 

 

Fair Value Impact

 

In Millions

 

Average

During the Fiscal Year

Ended May 31, 2020

 

 

Average

During the Fiscal Year

Ended May 26, 2019

 

Processing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Energy commodities

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

0.4

 

Agriculture commodities

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.4

 

Other commodities

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Foreign exchange

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.7

 

 Fair Value Impact
In Millions
Average
During the Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2018
 
Average
During the Fiscal Year Ended May 28, 2017
Processing Activities   
 Energy commodities$0.2
 $0.4
Agriculture commodities0.4
 0.5
Foreign exchange0.7
 0.3



ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Earnings

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

 

For the Fiscal Years Ended May

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net sales

 

$

11,054.4

 

 

$

9,538.4

 

 

$

7,938.3

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

7,984.8

 

 

 

6,885.4

 

 

 

5,586.8

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

1,622.5

 

 

 

1,473.4

 

 

 

1,398.4

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

 

 

(9.9

)

 

 

(35.1

)

 

 

(80.4

)

Interest expense, net

 

 

487.1

 

 

 

391.4

 

 

 

158.7

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings

 

 

969.9

 

 

 

823.3

 

 

 

874.8

 

Income tax expense

 

 

201.3

 

 

 

218.8

 

 

 

174.6

 

Equity method investment earnings

 

 

73.2

 

 

 

75.8

 

 

 

97.3

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

841.8

 

 

 

680.3

 

 

 

797.5

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

14.3

 

Net income

 

$

841.8

 

 

$

678.4

 

 

$

811.8

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

3.4

 

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

 

$

840.1

 

 

$

678.3

 

 

$

808.4

 

Earnings per share — basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

$

1.72

 

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

1.97

 

Income from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.03

 

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

$

1.72

 

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

2.00

 

Earnings per share — diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

$

1.72

 

 

$

1.53

 

 

$

1.95

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

0.03

 

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

$

1.72

 

 

$

1.52

 

 

$

1.98

 


 For the Fiscal Years Ended May
 2018 2017 2016
Net sales$7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 $8,664.1
Costs and expenses:     
Cost of goods sold5,586.8
 5,484.8
 6,234.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses1,318.0
 1,417.1
 2,024.6
Interest expense, net158.7
 195.5
 295.8
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings874.8
 729.5
 108.8
Income tax expense174.6
 254.7
 46.4
Equity method investment earnings97.3
 71.2
 66.1
Income from continuing operations797.5
 546.0
 128.5
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax14.3
 102.0
 (794.4)
Net income (loss)$811.8
 $648.0
 $(665.9)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests3.4
 8.7
 11.1
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.$808.4
 $639.3
 $(677.0)
Earnings (loss) per share — basic     
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$1.97
 $1.26
 $0.29
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders0.03
 0.22
 (1.86)
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$2.00
 $1.48
 $(1.57)
Earnings (loss) per share — diluted     
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$1.95
 $1.25
 $0.29
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders0.03
 0.21
 (1.85)
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$1.98
 $1.46
 $(1.56)

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.




Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in millions)

 

 

For the Fiscal Years Ended May

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

 

Pre-Tax

Amount

 

 

Tax

(Expense)

Benefit

 

 

After

-Tax

Amount

 

 

Pre-Tax

Amount

 

 

Tax

(Expense)

Benefit

 

 

After-Tax

Amount

 

 

Pre-Tax

Amount

 

 

Tax

(Expense)

Benefit

 

 

After-

Tax

Amount

 

Net income

 

$

1,043.1

 

 

$

(201.3

)

 

$

841.8

 

 

$

900.0

 

 

$

(221.6

)

 

$

678.4

 

 

$

972.3

 

 

$

(160.5

)

 

$

811.8

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized derivative adjustments

 

 

(7.1

)

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

(5.3

)

 

 

45.5

 

 

 

(11.4

)

 

 

34.1

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

2.0

 

Reclassification for derivative adjustments included in net income

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

0.8

 

Currency translation adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized currency translation gains (losses)

 

 

(42.7

)

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

(41.3

)

 

 

(10.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(10.2

)

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.7

 

Reclassification for currency translation losses included in net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement benefit obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized pension and postretirement benefit obligations

 

 

63.2

 

 

 

(15.9

)

 

 

47.3

 

 

 

(43.8

)

 

 

10.9

 

 

 

(32.9

)

 

 

157.3

 

 

 

(45.0

)

 

 

112.3

 

Reclassification for pension and postretirement benefit obligations included in net income

 

 

(5.5

)

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

(4.1

)

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

0.7

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

1,047.7

 

 

 

(211.7

)

 

 

836.0

 

 

 

898.5

 

 

 

(221.2

)

 

 

677.3

 

 

 

1,135.4

 

 

 

(207.0

)

 

 

928.4

 

Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(4.8

)

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Comprehensive income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

 

$

1,051.6

 

 

$

(210.8

)

 

$

840.8

 

 

$

900.2

 

 

$

(221.1

)

 

$

679.1

 

 

$

1,134.7

 

 

$

(205.8

)

 

$

928.9

 


 For the Fiscal Years Ended May
 2018 2017 2016
 Pre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitAfter-Tax Amount Pre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitAfter-Tax Amount Pre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitAfter-Tax Amount
Net income (loss)$972.3
$(160.5)$811.8
 $989.2
$(341.2)$648.0
 $(1,033.6)$367.7
$(665.9)
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Derivative adjustments:           
Unrealized derivative adjustments2.9
(0.9)2.0
 (1.0)0.4
(0.6) 


Reclassification for derivative adjustments included in net income0.1

0.1
 (0.2)0.1
(0.1) (2.1)0.8
(1.3)
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities1.1
(0.3)0.8
 0.5
(0.2)0.3
 0.1

0.1
Currency translation adjustment:           
Unrealized currency translation gains (losses)0.8
(0.1)0.7
 (13.6)0.2
(13.4) (58.9)
(58.9)
Reclassification for currency translation losses included in net income


 


 73.4

73.4
Pension and post-employment benefit obligations:           
Unrealized pension and post-employment benefit obligations157.3
(45.0)112.3
 209.2
(80.6)128.6
 (37.7)14.8
(22.9)
Reclassification for pension and post-employment benefit obligations included in net income0.9
(0.2)0.7
 10.4
(4.0)6.4
 (14.5)4.9
(9.6)
Comprehensive income (loss)1,135.4
(207.0)928.4
 1,194.5
(425.3)769.2
 (1,073.3)388.2
(685.1)
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests0.7
(1.2)(0.5) 12.6
(0.7)11.9
 7.8
(0.9)6.9
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.$1,134.7
$(205.8)$928.9
 $1,181.9
$(424.6)$757.3
 $(1,081.1)$389.1
$(692.0)

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.





Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in millions, except share data)

 

 

May 31, 2020

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

553.3

 

 

$

236.6

 

Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.6 and $2.2

 

 

860.8

 

 

 

818.2

 

Inventories

 

 

1,377.9

 

 

 

1,548.9

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

93.9

 

 

 

93.4

 

Current assets held for sale

 

 

 

 

 

36.7

 

Total current assets

 

 

2,885.9

 

 

 

2,733.8

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land and land improvements

 

 

145.3

 

 

 

141.7

 

Buildings, machinery and equipment

 

 

4,144.6

 

 

 

3,915.1

 

Furniture, fixtures, office equipment and other

 

 

656.2

 

 

 

677.5

 

Construction in progress

 

 

243.8

 

 

 

172.0

 

 

 

 

5,189.9

 

 

 

4,906.3

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(2,800.3

)

 

 

(2,578.9

)

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

2,389.6

 

 

 

2,327.4

 

Goodwill

 

 

11,436.3

 

 

 

11,435.4

 

Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net

 

 

4,315.7

 

 

 

4,539.3

 

Other assets

 

 

1,273.4

 

 

 

915.5

 

Noncurrent assets held for sale

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

262.4

 

 

 

$

22,304.0

 

 

$

22,213.8

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable

 

$

1.1

 

 

$

1.0

 

Current installments of long-term debt

 

 

845.5

 

 

 

20.6

 

Accounts payable

 

 

1,525.6

 

 

 

1,252.1

 

Accrued payroll

 

 

189.4

 

 

 

173.2

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

725.8

 

 

 

690.6

 

Current liabilities held for sale

 

 

 

 

 

5.1

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

3,287.4

 

 

 

2,142.6

 

Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments

 

 

8,900.8

 

 

 

10,459.8

 

Subordinated debt

 

 

 

 

 

195.9

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

 

2,165.1

 

 

 

1,951.8

 

Total liabilities

 

 

14,353.3

 

 

 

14,750.1

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stockholders' equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock of $5 par value, authorized 1,200,000,000 shares;

   issued 584,219,229

 

 

2,921.2

 

 

 

2,921.2

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

2,323.2

 

 

 

2,286.0

 

Retained earnings

 

 

5,471.2

 

 

 

5,047.9

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(109.6

)

 

 

(110.3

)

Less treasury stock, at cost, 97,057,311 and 98,133,747 common shares

 

 

(2,729.9

)

 

 

(2,760.2

)

Total Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders' equity

 

 

7,876.1

 

 

 

7,384.6

 

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

74.6

 

 

 

79.1

 

Total stockholders' equity

 

 

7,950.7

 

 

 

7,463.7

 

 

 

$

22,304.0

 

 

$

22,213.8

 

 May 27,
2018
 May 28,
2017
ASSETS   
Current assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$128.0
 $251.4
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.0 and $3.1582.6
 563.4
Inventories997.1
 927.9
Prepaid expenses and other current assets186.8
 228.7
Current assets held for sale44.4
 41.8
Total current assets1,938.9
 2,013.2
Property, plant and equipment   
Land and land improvements108.6
 103.2
Buildings, machinery and equipment3,238.8
 3,140.9
Furniture, fixtures, office equipment and other628.9
 724.2
Construction in progress85.9
 124.9
 4,062.2
 4,093.2
Less accumulated depreciation(2,442.1) (2,460.1)
Property, plant and equipment, net1,620.1
 1,633.1
Goodwill4,502.5
 4,295.3
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net1,284.5
 1,223.7
Other assets906.3
 790.6
Noncurrent assets held for sale137.2
 140.4
 $10,389.5
 $10,096.3
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY   
Current liabilities   
Notes payable$277.3
 $28.2
Current installments of long-term debt307.0
 199.0
Accounts payable915.1
 773.1
Accrued payroll163.9
 167.6
Other accrued liabilities672.9
 552.6
Total current liabilities2,336.2
 1,720.5
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments3,035.6
 2,573.3
Subordinated debt195.9
 195.9
Other noncurrent liabilities1,065.2
 1,528.8
Total liabilities6,632.9
 6,018.5
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
 
Common stockholders' equity   
Common stock of $5 par value, authorized 1,200,000,000 shares; issued 567,907,1722,839.7
 2,839.7
Additional paid-in capital1,180.0
 1,171.9
Retained earnings4,744.9
 4,247.0
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(110.5) (212.9)
Less treasury stock, at cost, 177,078,193 and 151,387,209 common shares(4,977.9) (4,054.9)
Total Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders' equity3,676.2
 3,990.8
Noncontrolling interests80.4
 87.0
Total stockholders' equity3,756.6
 4,077.8
 $10,389.5
 $10,096.3

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity

(in millions)

 

 

Conagra Brands, Inc. Stockholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common

Shares

 

 

Common

Stock

 

 

Additional

Paid-in

Capital

 

 

Retained

Earnings

 

 

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Income (Loss)

 

 

Treasury

Stock

 

 

Noncontrolling

Interests

 

 

Total

Equity

 

Balance at May 28, 2017

 

 

567.9

 

 

$

2,839.7

 

 

$

1,171.9

 

 

$

4,247.0

 

 

$

(212.9

)

 

$

(4,054.9

)

 

$

87.0

 

 

$

4,077.8

 

Stock option and incentive plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

44.3

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

53.7

 

Spinoff of Lamb Weston

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.8

 

Adoption of ASU 2018-02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.4

 

 

 

(17.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

0.7

 

Repurchase of common shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(967.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(967.3

)

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

Derivative adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.1

 

Activities of noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

(5.5

)

Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

113.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

113.0

 

Dividends declared on common stock; $0.85 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(341.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(341.9

)

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

808.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

808.4

 

Balance at May 27, 2018

 

 

567.9

 

 

 

2,839.7

 

 

 

1,180.0

 

 

 

4,744.9

 

 

 

(110.5

)

 

 

(4,977.9

)

 

 

80.4

 

 

 

3,756.6

 

Stock option and incentive plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6.7

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39.6

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

33.1

 

Adoption of ASU 2016-01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adoption of ASU 2014-09

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

Currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

0.2

 

Issuance of treasury shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

638.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,178.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,816.3

 

Issuance of common stock

 

16.3

 

 

81.5

 

 

474.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

555.7

 

Derivative adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.7

 

Activities of noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.8

 

Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(34.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(34.0

)

Dividends declared on common stock; $0.85 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(376.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(376.5

)

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

678.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

678.3

 

Balance at May 26, 2019

 

 

584.2

 

 

 

2,921.2

 

 

 

2,286.0

 

 

 

5,047.9

 

 

 

(110.3

)

 

 

(2,760.2

)

 

 

79.1

 

 

 

7,463.7

 

Stock option and incentive plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37.2

 

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64.6

 

Currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(34.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6.5

)

 

 

(41.3

)

Derivative adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.7

)

Activities of noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

2.0

 

Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43.2

 

Dividends declared on common stock; $0.85 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(413.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(413.9

)

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

840.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

840.1

 

Balance at May 31, 2020

 

 

584.2

 

 

$

2,921.2

 

 

$

2,323.2

 

 

$

5,471.2

 

 

$

(109.6

)

 

$

(2,729.9

)

 

$

74.6

 

 

$

7,950.7

 

  Conagra Brands, Inc. Stockholders' Equity    
  
Common
Shares
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Equity
Balance at May 31, 2015 567.9
 $2,839.7
 $1,049.4
 $4,331.1
 $(329.5) $(3,364.7) $84.0
 $4,610.0
Stock option and incentive plans     91.7
 (1.2)   228.5
   319.0
Currency translation adjustment         18.7
   (4.2) 14.5
Unrealized gain on securities         0.1
     0.1
Derivative adjustment, net of reclassification adjustment         (1.3)     (1.3)
Activities of noncontrolling interests     (4.8)       1.4
 (3.4)
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits         (32.5)     (32.5)
Dividends declared on common stock; $1.00 per share       (434.6)       (434.6)
Net loss attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.       (677.0)       (677.0)
Balance at May 29, 2016 567.9
 2,839.7
 1,136.3
 3,218.3
 (344.5) (3,136.2) 81.2
 3,794.8
Stock option and incentive plans     36.4
 (1.3)   81.3
   116.4
Adoption of ASU 2016-09       (3.9)       (3.9)
Spinoff of Lamb Weston       783.3
 13.6
     796.9
Currency translation adjustment, net         (16.6)   3.2
 (13.4)
Repurchase of common shares           (1,000.0)   (1,000.0)
Unrealized gain on securities         0.3
     0.3
Derivative adjustment, net of reclassification adjustment         (0.7)     (0.7)
Activities of noncontrolling interests     (0.8)       2.6
 1.8
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits         135.0
     135.0
Dividends declared on common stock; $0.90 per share       (388.7)       (388.7)
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.       639.3
       639.3
Balance at May 28, 2017 567.9
 2,839.7
 1,171.9
 4,247.0
 (212.9) (4,054.9) 87.0
 4,077.8
Stock option and incentive plans     10.0
 (0.8)   44.3
 0.2
 53.7
Spinoff of Lamb Weston       14.8
       14.8
Adoption of ASU 2018-02       17.4
 (17.4)     
Currency translation adjustment, net         4.6
   (3.9) 0.7
Repurchase of common shares           (967.3)   (967.3)
Unrealized gain on securities         0.8
     0.8
Derivative adjustment, net of reclassification adjustment         2.1
     2.1
Activities of noncontrolling interests     (1.9)   (0.7)   (2.9) (5.5)
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits         113.0
     113.0
Dividends declared on common stock; $0.85 per share       (341.9)       (341.9)
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.       808.4
       808.4
Balance at May 27, 2018 567.9
 $2,839.7
 $1,180.0
 $4,744.9
 $(110.5) $(4,977.9) $80.4
 $3,756.6

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in millions)

 

 

For the Fiscal Years Ended May

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

841.8

 

 

$

678.4

 

 

$

811.8

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

14.3

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

841.8

 

 

 

680.3

 

 

 

797.5

 

Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating

   activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

388.9

 

 

 

333.0

 

 

 

257.0

 

Asset impairment charges

 

 

259.9

 

 

 

93.8

 

 

 

14.7

 

Loss (gain) on divestitures

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

(69.4

)

 

 

 

Lease cancellation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48.2

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

 

Significant litigation accruals

 

 

 

 

 

(39.3

)

 

 

151.0

 

Proceeds from the settlement of interest rate swaps

 

 

 

 

 

47.5

 

 

 

 

Novation of a legacy guarantee

 

 

 

 

 

(27.3

)

 

 

 

Earnings of affiliates in excess of distributions

 

 

(21.8

)

 

 

(20.8

)

 

 

(34.8

)

Stock-settled share-based payments expense

 

 

59.2

 

 

 

33.7

 

 

 

37.9

 

Contributions to pension plans

 

 

(17.5

)

 

 

(14.7

)

 

 

(312.6

)

Pension expense (benefit)

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

(22.7

)

 

 

(56.1

)

Other items

 

 

11.3

 

 

 

12.3

 

 

 

(34.0

)

Change in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of business acquisitions and

   dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

 

(43.8

)

 

 

(69.1

)

 

 

(4.7

)

Inventories

 

 

163.5

 

 

 

78.0

 

 

 

(62.8

)

Deferred income taxes and income taxes payable, net

 

 

23.1

 

 

 

83.7

 

 

 

10.5

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(13.6

)

 

 

(19.1

)

 

 

3.2

 

Accounts payable

 

 

234.4

 

 

 

38.2

 

 

 

144.9

 

Accrued payroll

 

 

15.9

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(8.0

)

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

(66.8

)

 

 

(9.4

)

 

 

(32.2

)

Net cash flows from operating activities - continuing operations

 

 

1,842.6

 

 

 

1,114.3

 

 

 

919.7

 

Net cash flows from operating activities - discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

11.2

 

 

 

34.5

 

Net cash flows from operating activities

 

 

1,842.6

 

 

 

1,125.5

 

 

 

954.2

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 

 

(369.5

)

 

 

(353.1

)

 

 

(251.6

)

Sale of property, plant and equipment

 

 

14.0

 

 

 

22.5

 

 

 

8.0

 

Purchase of business, net of cash acquired

 

 

 

 

 

(5,119.2

)

 

 

(337.1

)

Proceeds from divestitures, net of cash divested

 

 

194.6

 

 

 

281.5

 

 

 

 

Purchase of marketable securities

 

 

(46.8

)

 

 

(61.0

)

 

 

 

Sales of marketable securities

 

 

53.8

 

 

 

52.2

 

 

 

 

Other items

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

11.1

 

 

 

4.5

 

Net cash flows from investing activities

 

 

(153.8

)

 

 

(5,166.0

)

 

 

(576.2

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net short-term borrowings (repayments)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(277.3

)

 

 

249.1

 

Issuance of long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

8,310.5

 

 

 

800.0

 

Repayment of long-term debt

 

 

(947.5

)

 

 

(3,972.7

)

 

 

(242.3

)

Debt issuance costs and bridge financing fees

 

 

 

 

 

(95.2

)

 

 

(3.0

)

Payment of intangible asset financing arrangement

 

 

(13.6

)

 

 

(14.0

)

 

 

(14.4

)

Issuance of Conagra Brands, Inc. common shares, net

 

 

 

 

 

555.7

 

 

 

 

Repurchase of Conagra Brands, Inc. common shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(967.3

)

Cash dividends paid

 

 

(413.6

)

 

 

(356.2

)

 

 

(342.3

)

Exercise of stock options and issuance of other stock awards, including tax withholdings

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

(1.6

)

 

 

14.9

 

Other items

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

(1.6

)

Net cash flows from financing activities

 

 

(1,370.4

)

 

 

4,149.8

 

 

 

(506.9

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

5.5

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

316.7

 

 

 

108.6

 

 

 

(123.4

)

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year

 

 

237.6

 

 

 

129.0

 

 

 

252.4

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year

 

$

554.3

 

 

$

237.6

 

 

$

129.0

 

 For the Fiscal Years Ended May
 2018 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income (loss)$811.8
 $648.0
 $(665.9)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations14.3
 102.0
 (794.4)
Income from continuing operations797.5
 546.0
 128.5
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization257.0
 268.0
 278.5
Asset impairment charges14.7
 343.3
 62.6
Gain on divestitures
 (197.4) 
Lease cancellation expense48.2
 
 55.6
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 93.3
 23.9
Significant litigation accruals151.0
 
 
Earnings of affiliates in excess of distributions(34.8) (3.0) (25.7)
Stock-settled share-based payments expense37.9
 36.1
 41.8
Contributions to pension plans(312.6) (163.0) (11.5)
Pension expense (benefit)(56.1) (21.4) 358.1
Other items(34.0) 39.9
 53.6
Change in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of business acquisitions and dispositions:     
Receivables(4.7) 104.7
 (156.8)
Inventories(62.8) 123.3
 66.1
Deferred income taxes and income taxes payable, net10.5
 52.3
 (264.9)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets3.2
 15.0
 10.8
Accounts payable144.9
 71.0
 (118.3)
Accrued payroll(8.0) (52.4) 68.9
Other accrued liabilities(32.2) (114.9) 54.3
Net cash flows from operating activities - continuing operations919.7
 1,140.8
 625.5
Net cash flows from operating activities - discontinued operations34.5
 34.7
 633.7
Net cash flows from operating activities954.2
 1,175.5
 1,259.2
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Additions to property, plant and equipment(251.6) (242.1) (277.5)
Sale of property, plant and equipment8.0
 13.2
 35.7
Proceeds from divestitures
 489.0
 
Purchase of business and intangible assets(337.1) (325.7) (10.4)
Other items4.5
 
 0.3
Net cash flows from investing activities - continuing operations(576.2) (65.6) (251.9)
Net cash flows from investing activities - discontinued operations
 (123.7) 2,379.3
Net cash flows from investing activities(576.2) (189.3) 2,127.4
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Net short-term borrowings249.1
 14.3
 9.5
Issuance of long-term debt, net of debt issuance costs797.0
 
 
Repayment of long-term debt(242.3) (1,064.5) (2,523.2)
Payment of intangible asset financing arrangement(14.4) (14.9) 
Repurchase of Conagra Brands, Inc. common shares(967.3) (1,000.0) 
Sale of Conagra Brands, Inc. common shares
 
 8.6
Cash dividends paid(342.3) (415.0) (432.5)
Exercise of stock options and issuance of other stock awards, including tax withholdings14.9
 73.8
 208.4
Other items(1.6) (1.9) 
Net cash flows from financing activities - continuing operations(506.9) (2,408.2) (2,729.2)
Net cash flows from financing activities - discontinued operations
 839.1
 (4.0)
Net cash flows from financing activities(506.9) (1,569.1) (2,733.2)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents5.5
 (0.2) (2.0)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(123.4) (583.1) 651.4
Add: Cash balance included in assets held for sale and discontinued operations at beginning of period
 36.4
 49.0
Less: Cash balance included in assets held for sale and discontinued operations at end of period
 
 36.4
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year251.4
 798.1
 134.1
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$128.0
 $251.4
 $798.1

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



50


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Fiscal Year — The fiscal year of Conagra Brands, Inc. ("Conagra Brands", "Company", "we", "us", or "our") ends the last Sunday in May. The fiscal years for the consolidated financial statements presented consist of a 53-week period for fiscal 2020 and 52-week periods for fiscal years 2018, 2017,2019 and 2016.

2018.

Basis of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Conagra Brands, Inc. and all majority-owned subsidiaries. In addition, the accounts of all variable interest entities for which we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date such determination is made. All significant intercompany investments, accounts, and transactions have been eliminated.

On November 9, 2016, we completed the spinoff of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. ("Lamb Weston") through a distribution of 100% of our interest in Lamb Weston to holders of shares of our common stock as of November 1, 2016 (the "Spinoff"). In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"), the results of operations of the Lamb Weston operations are presented as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from continuing operations and segment results for all periods presented (see Note 6 for additional discussion).

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates — The investments in, and the operating results of, 50%-or-less-owned entities not required to be consolidated are included in the consolidated financial statements on the basis of the equity method of accounting or the cost method of accounting, depending on specific facts and circumstances.

accounting.

We review our investments in unconsolidated affiliates for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be fully recoverable. Evidence of a loss in value that is other than temporary includes, but is not limited to, the absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the inability of the investee to sustain an earnings capacity which would justify the carrying amount of the investment, or, where applicable, estimated sales proceeds which are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the investment. Management's assessment as to whether any decline in value is other than temporary is based on our ability and intent to hold the investment and whether evidence indicating the carrying value of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. Management generally considers our investments in equity method investees to be strategic long-term investments. Therefore, management completes its assessments with a long-term viewpoint. If the fair value of the investment is determined to be less than the carrying value and the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, an appropriate write-down is recorded based on the excess of the carrying value over the best estimate of fair value of the investment.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition, including short-term time deposits and government agency and corporate obligations, are classified as cash and cash equivalents.

Receivables — Receivables from customers generally do not bear interest. Terms and collection vary by location and channel. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our estimate of probable non-payments and credit losses in our existing receivables, as determined based on a review of past due balances and other specific account data. Account balances are written off against the allowance when we deem them uncollectible.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table details the balances of our allowance for doubtful accounts and changes therein:

 

 

Balance at

Beginning

of Period

 

 

Additions

Charged

to Costs and

Expenses

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Deductions

from

Reserves

 

 

 

Balance at

Close of

Period

 

Year ended May 31, 2020

 

$

2.2

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

(1)

 

 

0.9

 

(2)

 

$

2.6

 

Year ended May 26, 2019

 

$

1.7

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.5

 

(1)

 

 

0.6

 

(2)

 

$

2.2

 

Year ended May 27, 2018

 

$

2.9

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

(2)

 

$

1.7

 

  
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Additions
Charged
to Costs  and
Expenses
 Other 
Deductions
from
Reserves
 
Balance at
Close of
Period
Year ended May 27, 2018 $3.1
 0.8
 
 1.9
(2) 
$2.0
Year ended May 28, 2017 $3.2
 1.0
 
 1.1
(2) 
$3.1
Year ended May 29, 2016 $3.0
 1.1
 (0.1)
(1) 
0.8
(2) 
$3.2

(1)

Primarily translation incurred during fiscal 2016.relates to the acquisition of Pinnacle and translation.

(2)

Bad debts charged off and adjustments to previous reserves, less recoveries.

51


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Inventories — We use the lower of cost (determined using the first-in, first-out method) or market for valuing inventories.

Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation has been calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective classes of assets as follows:

Land improvements

1 - 40 years

Buildings

15 - 40 years

Machinery and equipment

3 - 20 years

Furniture, fixtures, office equipment and other

5 - 15 years

We review property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of an asset considered "held-and-used" is determined by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset. If the carrying amount is greater than the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, the asset's carrying amount is reduced to its estimated fair value. An asset considered "held-for-sale" is reported at the lower of the asset's carrying amount or fair value.

Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets — Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives (e.g., brands or trademarks) are not amortized and are tested annually for impairment of value and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include deterioration in general economic conditions, adverse changes in the markets in which an entity operates, increases in input costs that have negative effects on earnings and cash flows, or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods, among others. The fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets.

In testing goodwill for impairment, we have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (more than 50%) that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we elect to perform a qualitative assessment and determine that an impairment is more likely than not, we are then required to perform a quantitative impairment test, otherwise no further analysis is required. We also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test.

Under the goodwill qualitative assessment, various events and circumstances that would affect the estimated fair value of a reporting unit are identified (similar to impairment indicators above). Furthermore, management considers the results of the most recent quantitative impairment test completed for a reporting unit and compares the weighted average cost of capital between the current and prior years for each reporting unit.

Under the goodwill quantitative impairment test, the evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. We estimate the fair value using level 3 inputs as defined by the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Note 2019 for the definition of the levels in the fair value hierarchy. The inputs used to calculate


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

the fair value include a number of subjective factors, such as estimates of future cash flows, estimates of our future cost structure, discount rates for our estimated cash flows, required level of working capital, assumed terminal value, and time horizon of cash flow forecasts. Prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeded its fair value, we completed a second step of the test to determine the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any, to be recognized. In the second step, we estimated an implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets). The impairment loss was equal to the excess of the carrying value of the goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and estimated fair value of the reporting unit.

In assessing other intangible assets not subject to amortization for impairment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. If we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, then we are not required to perform any additional tests for assessing intangible assets for impairment. However, if we conclude otherwise or elect not to perform the qualitative assessment, then we are required to perform a quantitative impairment test that involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

In fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018 we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for other intangible assets not subject to amortization.  The estimates of fair value of intangible assets not subject to amortization are determined using a "relief from royalty" methodology, which is used in estimating the fair value of our brands/trademarks. Discount rate assumptions are based

52


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

on an assessment of the risk inherent in the projected future cash flows generated by the respective intangible assets. Also subject to judgment are assumptions about royalty rates.

Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives (e.g., licensing arrangements with contractual lives or customer relationships) are amortized over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives are evaluated for impairment using a process similar to that used in evaluating elements of property, plant and equipment. If impaired, the asset is written down to its fair value.

Refer to Note 98 for discussion of the impairment charges related to goodwill and intangible assets in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016.

2018.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments — Unless otherwise specified, we believe the carrying value of financial instruments approximates their fair value.

Environmental Liabilities — Environmental liabilities are accrued when it is probable that obligations have been incurred and the associated amounts can be reasonably estimated. We use third-party specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the obligations associated with environmental liabilities. Such liabilities are adjusted as new information develops or circumstances change. We do not discount our environmental liabilities as the timing of the anticipated cash payments is not fixed or readily determinable. Management's estimate of our potential liability is independent of any potential recovery of insurance proceeds or indemnification arrangements. We do not reduce our environmental liabilities for potential insurance recoveries.

Employment-Related Benefits — Employment-related benefits associated with pensions, postretirement health care benefits, and workers' compensation are expensed as such obligations are incurred. The recognition of expense is impacted by estimates made by management, such as discount rates used to value these liabilities, future health care costs, and employee accidents incurred but not yet reported. We use third-party specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the obligations associated with employment-related benefits.

We recognize changes in the fair value of pension plan assets and net actuarial gains or losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the market-related value of plan assets or the plan's projected benefit obligation (the "corridor") in current period expense annually as of our measurement date, which is our fiscal year-end, or when measurement is required otherwise under U.S. GAAP.

Revenue Recognition — Our revenues primarily consist of the sale of food products that are sold to retailers and foodservice customers through direct sales forces, broker, and distributor arrangements. These revenue contracts generally accepted accounting principles.


have single performance obligations. Revenue, which includes shipping and handling charges billed to the customer, is reported net of variable consideration and consideration payable to our customers, including applicable discounts, returns, allowances, trade promotion, consumer coupon redemption, unsaleable product, and other costs. Amounts billed and due from our customers are classified as receivables and require payment on a short-term basis and, therefore, we do not have any significant financing components.

We recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of the goods to customers. Control is transferred upon delivery of the goods to the customer. Shipping and/or handling costs that occur before the customer obtains control of the goods are deemed to be fulfillment activities and are accounted for as fulfillment costs. We assess the goods and services promised in our customers' purchase orders and identify a performance obligation for each promise to transfer a good or service (or bundle of goods or services) that is distinct.

We offer various forms of trade promotions and the methodologies for determining these provisions are dependent on local customer pricing and promotional practices, which range from contractually fixed percentage price reductions to provisions based on actual occurrence or performance. Our promotional activities are conducted either through the retail trade or directly with consumers and include activities such as in-store displays and events, feature price discounts, consumer coupons, and loyalty programs. The costs of these activities are recognized at the time the related revenue is recorded, which normally precedes the actual cash expenditure. The recognition of these costs therefore requires management judgment regarding the volume of

53


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)


Revenue Recognition — Revenue is recognized when title

promotional offers that will be redeemed by either the retail trade or consumer. These estimates are made using various techniques including historical data on performance of similar promotional programs. Differences between estimated expense and risk of lossactual redemptions are transferred to customers upon delivery based on terms of sale and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated amounts for discounts, trade allowances, and returns of damaged and out-of-date products.

Shipping and Handling — Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are includeda change in net sales. Shipping and handling costs are includedmanagement estimate in cost of goods sold.
Marketinga subsequent period.

Advertising Costs We promote our products with advertising, consumer incentives, and trade promotions. Such programs include, but are not limited to, discounts, coupons, rebates, and volume-based incentives. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Consumer incentives and trade promotion activities are recorded as a reduction of revenue or as a component of cost of goods sold based on amounts estimated as being due to customers and consumers at the end of the period, based principally on historical utilization and redemption rates. Advertising and promotion expenses totaled $278.6$230.7 million, $328.3$253.4 million, and $347.2$278.6 million in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses.

Research and Development — We incurred expenses of $47.3$56.4 million, $44.6$56.1 million, and $59.6$47.3 million for research and development activities in fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Comprehensive Income — Comprehensive income includes net income, currency translation adjustments, certain derivative-related activity, changes in the value of available-for-sale investments (prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-01), and changes in prior service cost and net actuarial gains (losses) from pension (for amounts not in excess of the 10% "corridor") and postretirement health care plans. On foreign investments we deem to be essentially permanent in nature, we do not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting an investment denominated in a foreign currency to U.S. dollars. When we determine that a foreign investment, as well as undistributed earnings, are no longer permanent in nature, estimated taxes will be provided for the related deferred tax liability (asset), if any, resulting from currency translation adjustments.

The following table details the accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive income, (loss), net of tax:

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Currency translation losses, net of reclassification adjustments

 

$

(125.7

)

 

$

(90.9

)

 

$

(94.7

)

Derivative adjustments, net of reclassification adjustments

 

 

26.3

 

 

 

34.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

Pension and postretirement benefit obligations, net of reclassification adjustments

 

 

(10.2

)

 

 

(53.4

)

 

 

(17.4

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss 1

 

$

(109.6

)

 

$

(110.3

)

 

$

(110.5

)

 2018 2017 2016
Currency translation losses, net of reclassification adjustments$(94.7) $(98.6) $(95.2)
Derivative adjustments, net of reclassification adjustments1.0
 (1.1) (0.4)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities0.6
 (0.3) (0.6)
Pension and post-employment benefit obligations, net of reclassification adjustments(17.4) (112.9) (248.3)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss 1
$(110.5) $(212.9) $(344.5)

1Net of unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities reclassified to retained earnings as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-01 in fiscal 2019 and net of stranded tax effects from change in tax rate as a result of the early adoption of ASU 2018-02 in fiscal 2018 in the amount of $0.6 million and $17.4 million, which has been reclassified to retained earnings.


respectively.

54


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)


The following table summarizes the reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income (loss):income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings1

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

 

Net derivative adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow hedges

 

$

(3.3

)

 

$

(1.9

)

 

$

0.1

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

Total before tax

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

$

(2.4

)

 

$

(1.4

)

 

$

0.1

 

 

Net of tax

Amortization of pension and postretirement benefit obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net prior service cost (benefit)

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

0.9

 

 

$

(0.4

)

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

Net actuarial gain

 

 

(4.6

)

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

Pension settlement

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

Postretirement healthcare settlement

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

Curtailment

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

 

 

 

(5.5

)

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

0.9

 

 

Total before tax

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

Income tax expense

 

 

$

(4.1

)

 

$

(1.1

)

 

$

0.7

 

 

Net of tax

Currency translation losses

 

$

 

 

$

10.4

 

 

$

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

 

 

 

 

Total before tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

$

 

 

$

10.4

 

 

$

 

 

Net of tax

       
Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations1
 2018 2017 2016  
Net derivative adjustment, net of tax:       
     Cash flow hedges$0.1
 $(0.2) $(2.1) Interest expense, net
 0.1
 (0.2) (2.1) Total before tax
 
 0.1
 0.8
 Income tax expense
 $0.1
 $(0.1) $(1.3) Net of tax
Amortization of pension and postretirement healthcare liabilities:       
     Net prior service benefit$(0.4) $(3.9) $(5.1) Selling, general and administrative expenses
     Divestiture of Private Brands
 
 (4.3) Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
     Pension settlement of equity method investee
 
 (5.2) Equity method investment earnings
     Pension settlement1.3
 13.8
 
 Selling, general and administrative expenses
     Net actuarial loss
 0.5
 0.1
 Selling, general and administrative expenses
 0.9
 10.4
 (14.5) Total before tax
 (0.2) (4.0) 4.9
 Income tax expense
 $0.7
 $6.4
 $(9.6) Net of tax
Currency translation losses$
 $
 $73.4
 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 73.4
 Total before tax
 
 
 
 Income tax expense
 $
 $
 $73.4
 Net of tax

1Amounts in parentheses indicate income recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Earnings.

Foreign Currency Transaction Gains and Losses — We recognized net foreign currency transaction losses from continuing operations of $1.4$1.7 million, $1.5$2.3 million, and $5.1$1.4 million in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively, in SG&A expenses.

Business Combinations — We use the acquisition method in accounting for acquired businesses. Under the acquisition method, our financial statements reflect the operations of an acquired business starting from the completion of the acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

Reclassifications and other changes — Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

Use of Estimates — Preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principlesU.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses as reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Accounting Changes — In July 2015,February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-11, Inventory, which requires an entity to measure inventory within the scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We adopted this ASU prospectively in fiscal 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to our financial statements.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which will allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for the tax effects resulting from "An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018" (the "Act") that are stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income. This standard also requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. This ASU, however, does not change the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations. ASU 2018-02 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. It must be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Act is recognized. We elected to early adopt this ASU for the period ended February 25, 2018. The amount of the reclassification was $17.4 million.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards — In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. On July 9, 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Based on the FASB's ASU, we will apply the new revenue standard in our fiscal year 2019. Early adoption in our fiscal year 2018 is permitted. Entities will have the option to adopt the ASU using either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. We have concluded our assessment of the new standard and will be adopting the provisions of the ASU utilizing the modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The effective date for this standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-01 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, Topic 842, which requires lessees to reflect most leases on their balance sheet as assets and obligations. We adopted this ASU in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 using the optional transition method provided under ASU 2018-11, Leases, Topic 842: Targeted Improvement, issued in July 2018, allowing for application of the standard at adoption date, with recognition of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. We also elected certain

55


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, including not reassessing whether existing contracts contain leases and carrying forward the historical classification of leases. The most significant impact of adoption on our Consolidated Financial Statements was the recognition of right-of-use ("ROU") assets and lease liabilities for operating leases. Our accounting for finance leases remained substantially unchanged. Upon adoption, we had total lease assets of $238.4 million and total lease liabilities of $267.0 million. The difference is primarily due to prepaid and deferred rent balances that were reclassified to the ROU asset value. The adoption of this ASU did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings and did not impact our Consolidated Statements of Earnings or our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. See Note 15 for additional information related to our lease arrangements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We elected to early adopt this ASU in fiscal 2020. The adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the effect thatof this standard willguidance did not have ona material impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard is to be applied under the modified retrospective method, with elective reliefs, which requires application of the new guidance for all periods presented.

In August 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which clarifies how companies present and classifyremoves certain cash receipts and cash payments inexceptions to the statementgeneral principles of cash flows.ASC 740 as part of an overall simplification initiative. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.2020 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We elected to early adopt this ASU in fiscal 2020. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards — In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU 2016-13"), to update the methodology used to measure current expected credit losses ("CECL"). This ASU applies to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, net investments in leases, and trade accounts receivable as well as certain off-balance sheet credit exposures, such as loan commitments. This ASU replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology to reflect CECL and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to explain credit loss estimates. The guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition method through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the period of adoption. This ASU will be effective beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2021.  We do not expect ASU 2016-152016-13 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash, which provides amendments to current guidance to address the classifications and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-18 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which provides a new framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires companies to present the service cost component of net benefit cost in the same line items in which they report compensation cost. Companies will present all other components of net benefit cost outside a subtotal of operating income, if presented, or disclosed separately. Also, only the service cost component may be eligible for capitalization where applicable. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively for the capitalization of service cost components. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We will adopt ASU 2017-07 in our fiscal 2019. The estimated impact is a reclassification of a benefit of $80.4 million, a benefit of $55.2 million, and a charge of $303.8 million to non-operating income (expense) for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements and make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current U.S. GAAP. The amendments in this update better align an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and presentation of hedge results. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We plan to early adopt this ASU at the beginning of our fiscal 2019. We do not expect ASU 2017-12 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

related disclosures.

2. ACQUISITIONS

On JuneOctober 26, 2018, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement withacquired Pinnacle Foods Inc. ("Pinnacle") under which we will acquire all, a branded packaged foods company specializing in shelf-stable and frozen foods. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 26, 2018 (the "Merger Agreement"), among the Company, Pinnacle, and Patriot Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that ceased to exist at the effective time of the merger, each outstanding sharesshare of Pinnacle common stock in a cash and stock transaction valued at approximately $10.9 billion, including Pinnacle's outstanding net debt. Underwas converted into the terms of the transaction, Pinnacle shareholders willright to receive $43.11 per share in cash and 0.6494 shares of our common stock, for eachpar value $5.00 per share, of Pinnacle.the Company ("Company Shares") (together, the "Merger Consideration"), with cash payable in lieu of fractional shares of Company Shares. The implied pricetotal amount of $68.00 perconsideration paid in connection with the acquisition was approximately $8.03 billion and consisted of: (1) cash of $5.17 billion ($5.12 billion net of cash acquired); (2) 77.5 million Company Shares, with an approximate value of $2.82 billion, issued out of the Company's treasury; and (3) replacement awards issued to former Pinnacle share is based onemployees representing the volume-weighted average pricefair value attributable to pre-combination service (see Note 13) of our$51.1 million.

In connection with the acquisition, we issued long-term debt of $8.33 billion (see Note 4) (which included funding under a new term loan agreement) and received cash proceeds of $575.0 million ($555.7 million net of related fees) from the issuance of common stock in an underwritten public offering. We used such proceeds for the five days ended June 21, 2018. payment of the cash portion of the Merger Consideration, the repayment of Pinnacle debt acquired, the refinancing of certain Conagra Brands debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses.

56


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The planned acquisition is expected to close byfollowing table summarizes our final allocation of the end of calendar 2018 and remains subjecttotal purchase consideration to the approvalfair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date.

 

 

October 26,

2018

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

47.0

 

Receivables

 

 

202.8

 

Inventories

 

 

649.3

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

15.0

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

719.5

 

Goodwill

 

 

7,026.0

 

Brands, trademarks and other intangibles

 

 

3,519.5

 

Other assets

 

 

25.4

 

Current liabilities

 

 

(607.6

)

Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments

 

 

(2,671.3

)

Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(810.0

)

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

 

(81.6

)

Total assets acquired and liabilities assumed

 

$

8,034.0

 

During fiscal 2020, we made adjustments to our initial allocations, which resulted in an increase to goodwill of $10.1 million primarily as the result of changes in the values of certain inventory, deferred income taxes, and other noncurrent liabilities as we refined our fair value estimates. These changes did not have a significant impact on our net income.

Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and is primarily attributable to synergies and intangible assets such as assembled workforce which are not separately recognizable. Of the total goodwill, $236.7 million is deductible for tax purposes. Amortizable brands, trademarks and other intangibles totaled $668.7 million and have a weighted average estimated useful life of 25 years.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations as if the acquisition of Pinnacle shareholders,had occurred on May 29, 2017, the receiptbeginning of regulatory approvals,fiscal year 2018. These unaudited pro forma results may not necessarily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved, nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations.

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Pro forma net sales

 

$

10,788.1

 

 

$

11,034.2

 

Pro forma net income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

 

$

803.8

 

 

$

1,089.7

 

The pro forma results include adjustments for amortization of acquired intangible assets, depreciation, and other customary closing conditions.interest expense on debt issued to finance the acquisition as well as the related income taxes. The pro forma results also include the following material nonrecurring adjustments, along with the related income tax effect of the adjustments:

Acquisition related costs incurred by the Company of $62.7 million during fiscal 2019 were excluded and assumed to have been incurred at the beginning of fiscal 2018. Acquisition related costs incurred by Pinnacle of $66.8 million during fiscal 2019 were excluded from the pro forma results.

Non-recurring expense of $53.0 million for fiscal 2019 related to the fair value adjustment to acquisition-date inventory estimated to have been sold was removed and $54.1 million of expense was included in the results for fiscal 2018.

Non-recurring expense of $45.7 million for fiscal 2019 related to securing bridge financing for the acquisition were excluded and assumed to have been incurred at the beginning of fiscal 2018.

In February 2018, we acquired the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business, maker of frozen breakfast and entree flatbread pocket sandwiches, for a cash purchase price of $87.3 million, net of cash acquired, including working capital adjustments. Approximately $57.8 million has been classified as goodwill pending determination of the final purchase price allocation, and $9.7 million and $7.1 million have been classified as non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. The business is included in the Refrigerated & Frozen segment.

57


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

In October 2017, we acquired Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, maker of Angie's®BOOMCHICKAPOP® ready-to-eat popcorn, for a cash purchase price of $249.8 million, net of cash acquired, including working capital adjustments. Approximately $155.2$156.7 million has been classified as goodwill, pending determination of the final purchase price allocation, of which $95.4 million is deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $73.8 million and $10.3 million of the purchase price have been allocated to non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The business is primarily included in the Grocery & Snacks segment.

In April 2017, we acquired protein-based snacking businesses Thanasi Foods LLC, maker of Duke’s® meat snacks, and BIGS LLC, maker of BIGS® seeds, for $217.6 million, net of cash acquired, including working capital adjustments. Approximately $133.3 million has been classified as goodwill, of which $70.5 million is deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $65.1 million and $16.1 million of the purchase price have been allocated to non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. These businesses are primarily included in the Grocery & Snacks segment.
In September 2016, we acquired the operating assets of Frontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC, including the Frontera®, Red Fork®, and Salpica® brands. These businesses make authentic, gourmet Mexican food products and contemporary American cooking sauces. We acquired the business for $108.1 million, net of cash acquired, including working capital adjustments. Approximately $39.5 million has been classified as goodwill and $59.5 million and $7.2 million have been classified as non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. These businesses are reflected principally within the Grocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent within the Refrigerated & Frozen and International segments.
These acquisitions collectively contributed $214.3 million and $36.5 million to net sales during fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.
segment.

For each of these acquisitions, the amounts allocated to goodwill were primarily attributable to anticipated synergies, product portfolios, and other intangibles that do not qualify for separate recognition.

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in these acquisitions were recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

3. RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES

Supply Chain

Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan

In December2018, our Board of Directors (the "Board") approved a restructuring and Administrative Efficiency Plan

In May 2013, we announcedintegration plan related to the Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the "SCAE Plan"), our plan to integrate and restructureongoing integration of the recently acquired operations of our Private Brands business, improve SG&A effectivenessPinnacle (the "Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan") for the purpose of achieving significant cost synergies between the companies. We expect to incur material charges for exit and efficiencies, and optimize our supply chain network, manufacturing assets, dry distribution centers, and mixing centers. In fiscal 2016, we announced plans to realize efficiency benefits by reducing SG&A expenses and enhancing trade spend processes and tools, which plans were included as part of the SCAE Plan. Although we divested the Private Brands business, we have continued to implement the SCAE Plan, including by working to optimize our supply chain network, pursue cost reductions through our SG&A functions, enhance trade spend processes and tools, and improve productivity.
disposal activities under U.S. GAAP. Although we remain unable to make good faith estimates relating to the entire SCAEPinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan, we are reporting on actions initiated through the end of fiscal 2020, including the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of costs expected to be incurred, and the charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows. We have approved the incurrence of up to $360.0 million ($255.0 million of cash charges and $105.0 million of non-cash charges) in relation to operational expenditures under the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan. We have incurred or expect to incur approximately $360.2 million of charges ($277.2 million of cash charges and $83.0 million of non-cash charges) for actions identified to date under the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan. We recognized charges of $73.8 million and $168.2 million in connection with the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan in fiscal 2020 and 2019, respectively. We expect to incur costs related to the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan through fiscal 2022.

We anticipate that we will recognize the following pre-tax expenses in association with the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan (amounts include charges recognized from plan inception through the end of fiscal 2020):

 

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

 

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

International

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Total

 

Accelerated depreciation

 

$

9.9

 

 

$

5.6

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

15.5

 

Other cost of goods sold

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

9.2

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.6

 

Total cost of goods sold

 

 

17.6

 

 

 

14.8

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

33.1

 

Severance and related costs

 

 

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

115.1

 

 

 

120.9

 

Asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)

 

 

36.2

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

42.9

 

Accelerated depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

7.4

 

Contract/lease termination

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

17.7

 

 

 

24.6

 

Consulting/professional fees

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

90.3

 

 

 

91.3

 

Other selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

10.2

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

28.4

 

 

 

40.0

 

Total selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

48.0

 

 

 

13.9

 

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

261.8

 

 

 

327.1

 

Consolidated total

 

$

65.6

 

 

$

28.7

 

 

$

4.1

 

 

$

261.8

 

 

$

360.2

 

58


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

During fiscal 2020, we recognized the following pre-tax expenses for the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan:

 

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

 

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

International

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Total

 

Accelerated depreciation

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

2.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2.7

 

Other cost of goods sold

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

Total cost of goods sold

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.0

 

Severance and related costs

 

 

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

8.8

 

Asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

6.9

 

Accelerated depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

2.7

 

Contract/lease termination

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.8

 

 

 

14.8

 

Consulting/professional fees

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

29.2

 

 

 

30.0

 

Other selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

7.6

 

Total selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

61.2

 

 

 

70.8

 

Consolidated total

 

$

1.3

 

 

$

10.3

 

 

$

1.0

 

 

$

61.2

 

 

$

73.8

 

Included in the above results are $51.2 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $22.6 million in non-cash charges.

We recognized the following cumulative (plan inception to May 31, 2020) pre-tax expenses for the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings:

 

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

 

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

International

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Total

 

Accelerated depreciation

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

2.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2.7

 

Other cost of goods sold

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.0

 

Total cost of goods sold

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.7

 

Severance and related costs

 

 

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

115.1

 

 

 

120.9

 

Asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

6.9

 

Accelerated depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

7.4

 

Contract/lease termination

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

15.1

 

 

 

15.9

 

Consulting/professional fees

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

67.3

 

 

 

68.3

 

Other selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

15.5

 

 

 

15.9

 

Total selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

223.3

 

 

 

235.3

 

Consolidated total

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

11.8

 

 

$

4.1

 

 

$

223.3

 

 

$

242.0

 

Included in the above results are $212.4 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $29.6 million in non-cash charges.

Liabilities recorded for the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan and changes therein for fiscal 2020 were as follows:

 

 

Balance at

May 26,

2019

 

 

Costs

Incurred

and Charged

to Expense

 

 

Costs Paid

or Otherwise

Settled

 

 

Changes in

Estimates

 

 

Balance at

May 31,

2020

 

Severance and related costs

 

$

76.9

 

 

$

11.0

 

 

$

(62.1

)

 

$

(2.2

)

 

$

23.6

 

Contract/lease termination

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

(5.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

Consulting/professional fees

 

 

18.4

 

 

 

30.0

 

 

 

(40.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

7.5

 

Other costs

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

7.6

 

 

 

(8.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

97.5

 

 

$

53.2

 

 

$

(116.9

)

 

$

(2.2

)

 

$

31.6

 

59


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Conagra Restructuring Plan

In fiscal 2019, management initiated a restructuring plan (the "Conagra Restructuring Plan") for costs in connection with actions taken to improve SG&A effectiveness and efficiencies and to optimize our supply chain network. Although we remain unable to make good faith estimates relating to the entire Conagra Restructuring Plan, we are reporting on actions initiated through the end of fiscal 2020, including the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of costs expected to be incurred, and the charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows. As of May 27, 2018, our Board of Directors has31, 2020, we have approved the incurrence of up to $900.9$131.1 million ($38.2 million of expenses in connectioncash charges and $92.9 million of non-cash charges) for several projects associated with the SCAE Plan, including expenses allocated for the Private Brands and Lamb Weston operations.Conagra Restructuring Plan. We have incurred or expect to incur approximately $471.6$129.5 million of charges ($322.140.1 million of cash charges and $149.5$89.4 million of non-cash charges) for actions identified to date under the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations.Conagra Restructuring Plan. We recognized charges of $38.0 million, $63.6$64.4 million and $281.8$2.2 million in relation toconnection with the SCAEConagra Restructuring Plan related to our continuing operations in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. We expect to incur costs related to the SCAEConagra Restructuring Plan over a multi-year period.

We anticipate that we will recognize the following pre-tax expenses in association with the SCAEConagra Restructuring Plan related to our continuing operations (amounts include charges recognized from plan inception to May 27, 2018)through the end of fiscal 2020):

 

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

 

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

International

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Total

 

Accelerated depreciation

 

$

38.0

 

 

$

20.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

58.1

 

Other cost of goods sold

 

 

9.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.0

 

Total cost of goods sold

 

 

47.0

 

 

 

21.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68.1

 

Severance and related costs

 

 

12.1

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

17.5

 

Asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)

 

 

25.0

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.3

 

Contract/lease termination

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.3

 

Consulting/professional fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

1.2

 

Other selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

14.3

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.5

 

Total selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

51.6

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

60.8

 

Total

 

$

98.6

 

 

$

26.7

 

 

$

1.6

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

$

128.9

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

Consolidated total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

129.5

 

 Grocery & Snacks Refrigerated & Frozen International Foodservice Corporate Total
Pension costs$33.4
 $1.5
 $
 $
 $
 $34.9
Accelerated depreciation37.0
 18.6
 
 
 1.2
 56.8
Other cost of goods sold11.9
 2.1
 
 
 
 14.0
    Total cost of goods sold82.3
 22.2
 
 
 1.2
 105.7
Severance and related costs, net27.5
 10.3
 3.7
 7.9
 102.6
 152.0
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)6.1
 6.9
 
 
 11.2
 24.2
Accelerated depreciation
 
 
 
 4.1
 4.1
Contract/lease cancellation expenses1.0
 0.6
 0.9
 
 84.4
 86.9
Consulting/professional fees1.0
 0.4
 0.1
 
 54.0
 55.5
Other selling, general and administrative expenses16.4
 3.3
 
 
 23.5
 43.2
    Total selling, general and administrative expenses52.0
 21.5
 4.7
 7.9
 279.8
 365.9
        Consolidated total$134.3
 $43.7
 $4.7
 $7.9
 $281.0
 $471.6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

During fiscal 2018,2020, we recognized the following pre-tax expenses for the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations:Conagra Restructuring Plan:

 

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

 

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

International

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Total

 

Accelerated depreciation

 

$

24.1

 

 

$

3.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

27.5

 

Other cost of goods sold

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.7

 

Total cost of goods sold

 

 

26.6

 

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.2

 

Severance and related costs

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

7.0

 

Asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)

 

 

25.0

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.3

 

Contract/lease termination

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Other selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

Total selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

30.6

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

33.6

 

Total

 

$

57.2

 

 

$

5.4

 

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

63.8

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

Consolidated total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

64.4

 

 Grocery & Snacks Refrigerated & Frozen International Corporate Total
Pension costs$0.5
 $
 $
 $
 $0.5
Accelerated depreciation2.0
 
 
 
 2.0
Other cost of goods sold5.3
 
 
 
 5.3
    Total cost of goods sold7.8
 
 
 
 7.8
Severance and related costs, net2.6
 
 1.2
 0.7
 4.5
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)(1.2) 
 
 4.4
 3.2
Accelerated depreciation
 
 
 1.5
 1.5
Contract/lease cancellation expenses0.2
 
 0.3
 13.0
 13.5
Consulting/professional fees0.1
 
 
 1.0
 1.1
Other selling, general and administrative expenses4.6
 0.1
 
 1.7
 6.4
    Total selling, general and administrative expenses6.3
 0.1
 1.5
 22.3
 30.2
Consolidated total$14.1
 $0.1
 $1.5
 $22.3
 $38.0

Included in the above tableresults are $30.6$11.4 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $7.4$53.0 million in non-cash charges.

60


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We recognized the following cumulative (plan inception to May 27, 2018)31, 2020) pre-tax expenses for the SCAEConagra Restructuring Plan related to our continuing operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations:Earnings:

 

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

 

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

International

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Total

 

Accelerated depreciation

 

$

24.1

 

 

$

4.2

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

28.3

 

Other cost of goods sold

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.7

 

Total cost of goods sold

 

 

26.6

 

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.0

 

Severance and related costs

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

8.4

 

Asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)

 

 

25.0

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.3

 

Contract/lease termination

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Other selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

Total selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

30.6

 

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

35.0

 

Total

 

$

57.2

 

 

$

6.7

 

 

$

1.3

 

 

$

0.8

 

 

$

66.0

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

Consolidated total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

66.6

 

 Grocery & Snacks Refrigerated & Frozen International Foodservice Corporate Total
Pension costs$33.4
 $1.5
 $
 $
 $
 $34.9
Accelerated depreciation33.0
 18.6
 
 
 1.2
 52.8
Other cost of goods sold10.3
 2.1
 
 
 
 12.4
    Total cost of goods sold76.7
 22.2
 
 
 1.2
 100.1
Severance and related costs, net26.5
 10.3
 3.7
 7.9
 102.2
 150.6
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)6.1
 6.9
 
 
 11.2
 24.2
Accelerated depreciation
 
 
 
 4.1
 4.1
Contract/lease cancellation expenses1.0
 0.6
 0.9
 
 84.3
 86.8
Consulting/professional fees1.0
 0.4
 0.1
 
 52.2
 53.7
Other selling, general and administrative expenses15.8
 3.3
 
 
 21.7
 40.8
    Total selling, general and administrative expenses50.4
 21.5
 4.7
 7.9
 275.7
 360.2
Consolidated total$127.1
 $43.7
 $4.7
 $7.9
 $276.9
 $460.3

Included in the above results are $316.1$12.8 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $144.2$53.8 million in non-cash charges. Not included

Liabilities recorded for the Conagra Restructuring Plan and changes therein for fiscal 2020 were as follows:

 

 

Balance at

May 26,

2019

 

 

Costs

Incurred

and Charged

to Expense

 

 

Costs Paid

or Otherwise

Settled

 

 

Changes in

Estimates

 

 

Balance at

May 31,

2020

 

Severance and related costs

 

$

1.2

 

 

$

7.5

 

 

$

(1.7

)

 

$

(0.5

)

 

$

6.5

 

Contract/lease termination

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other costs

 

 

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

(3.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

1.2

 

 

$

11.3

 

 

$

(5.5

)

 

$

(0.5

)

 

$

6.5

 

Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan

As of May 31, 2020, we had substantially completed our restructuring activities related to our Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the "SCAE Plan"). We recognized charges of $1.3 million, $9.6 million, and $38.0 million in connection with the above table are $130.2SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations in fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. We have recognized $471.2 million ofin pre-tax expenses ($84.5103.3 million in cost of goods sold, $365.6 million in SG&A expenses, and $2.3 million in pension and postretirement non-service income) from the inception of the SCAE Plan through May 31, 2020, related to our continuing operations. Included in these results were $322.0 million of cash charges and $45.7$149.2 million of non-cash charges) related to the Private Brands operations which we sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and $2.1 million of pre-tax expenses (all resulting in cash charges) related to Lamb Weston.


charges.

61


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)


Liabilities recorded for the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations and changes therein for fiscal 2018 were as follows:
 Balance at May 28,
2017
 
Costs Incurred
and Charged
to Expense
 
Costs Paid
or Otherwise Settled
 
Changes in
Estimates
 
Balance at
May 27,
2018
Pension costs$31.8
 $
 $
 $0.5
 $32.3
Severance and related costs13.8
 5.7
 (12.0) (1.2) 6.3
Consulting/professional fees0.6
 1.1
 (1.6) 
 0.1
Contract/lease cancellation11.6
 13.7
 (20.2) (0.2) 4.9
Other costs1.9
 11.0
 (12.7) 
 0.2
Total$59.7
 $31.5
 $(46.5) $(0.9) $43.8

4. LONG-TERM DEBT

 

 

May 31, 2020

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

5.4% senior debt due November 2048

 

$

1,000.0

 

 

$

1,000.0

 

4.65% senior debt due January 2043

 

 

176.7

 

 

 

176.7

 

6.625% senior debt due August 2039

 

 

91.4

 

 

 

91.4

 

5.3% senior debt due November 2038

 

 

1,000.0

 

 

 

1,000.0

 

8.25% senior debt due September 2030

 

 

300.0

 

 

 

300.0

 

4.85% senior debt due November 2028

 

 

1,300.0

 

 

 

1,300.0

 

7.0% senior debt due October 2028

 

 

382.2

 

 

 

382.2

 

6.7% senior debt due August 2027

 

 

9.2

 

 

 

9.2

 

7.125% senior debt due October 2026

 

 

262.5

 

 

 

262.5

 

4.6% senior debt due November 2025

 

 

1,000.0

 

 

 

1,000.0

 

4.3% senior debt due May 2024

 

 

1,000.0

 

 

 

1,000.0

 

LIBOR plus 1.50% term loan due October 2023

 

 

 

 

 

200.0

 

3.2% senior debt due January 2023

 

 

837.0

 

 

 

837.0

 

3.25% senior debt due September 2022

 

 

250.0

 

 

 

250.0

 

LIBOR plus 1.375% term loan due October 2021

 

 

 

 

 

200.0

 

3.8% senior debt due October 2021

 

 

1,200.0

 

 

 

1,200.0

 

9.75% subordinated debt due March 2021

 

 

195.9

 

 

 

195.9

 

LIBOR plus 0.75% senior debt due October 2020

 

 

 

 

 

525.0

 

LIBOR plus 0.50% senior debt due October 2020

 

 

500.0

 

 

 

500.0

 

4.95% senior debt due August 2020

 

 

126.6

 

 

 

126.6

 

2.00% to 9.59% lease financing obligations due on various dates through 2033

 

 

155.1

 

 

 

165.4

 

Other indebtedness

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Total face value of debt

 

 

9,786.7

 

 

 

10,722.0

 

Unamortized fair value adjustment

 

 

21.2

 

 

 

24.5

 

Unamortized discounts

 

 

(17.2

)

 

 

(19.0

)

Unamortized debt issuance costs

 

 

(44.6

)

 

 

(52.1

)

Adjustment due to hedging activity

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.9

 

Less current installments

 

 

(845.5

)

 

 

(20.6

)

Total long-term debt

 

$

8,900.8

 

 

$

10,655.7

 

 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
  4.65% senior debt due January 2043$176.7
 $176.7
  6.625% senior debt due August 203991.4
 91.4
  8.25% senior debt due September 2030300.0
 300.0
  7.0% senior debt due October 2028382.2
 382.2
  6.7% senior debt due August 20279.2
 9.2
  7.125% senior debt due October 2026262.5
 262.5
  3.2% senior debt due January 2023837.0
 837.0
  3.25% senior debt due September 2022250.0
 250.0
  9.75% subordinated debt due March 2021195.9
 195.9
  LIBOR plus 0.50% senior debt due October 2020500.0
 
  4.95% senior debt due August 2020126.6
 126.6
  LIBOR plus 0.75% term loan due February 2019300.0
 
  2.1% senior debt due March 2018
 70.0
  1.9% senior debt due January 2018
 119.6
  2.00% to 9.59% lease financing obligations due on various dates through 203394.7
 131.2
  Other indebtedness0.2
 0.2
    Total face value of debt3,526.4
 2,952.5
    Unamortized fair value adjustment27.6
 30.8
    Unamortized discounts(5.8) (6.4)
    Unamortized debt issuance costs(11.3) (10.9)
    Adjustment due to hedging activity1.6
 2.2
    Less current installments(307.0) (199.0)
      Total long-term debt$3,231.5
 $2,769.2

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The aggregate minimum principal maturities of the long-term debt for each of the five fiscal years following May 27, 2018,31, 2020, are as follows:

2021

 

$

844.7

 

2022

 

 

1,221.4

 

2023

 

 

1,105.0

 

2024

 

 

1,015.0

 

2025

 

 

13.8

 

2019$307.1
20206.7
2021829.4
20226.9
20231,093.6

Pinnacle Acquisition Financing

In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, in connection with the announcement of the acquisition of Pinnacle Foods Inc. (the "Pinnacle acquisition"), we secured $9.0 billion in fully committed bridge financing. Prior to the acquisition, we capitalized financing costs related to the bridge financing of $45.7 million to be amortized over the commitment period. Our net interest expense included $11.9 million for fiscal 2019 as a result of this amortization. The bridge facility was terminated in connection with the acquisition, and we recognized $33.8 million of expense within SG&A expenses in fiscal 2019 for the remaining unamortized financing costs.

62


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

During the second quarter of fiscal 2019, to finance a portion of our acquisition of Pinnacle, we issued senior unsecured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $7.025 billion. We issued the new senior unsecured notes in seven tranches: floating rate senior notes due October 22, 2020 in an aggregate principal amount of $525.0 million with interest equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.75%, 3.8% senior notes due October 22, 2021 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.20 billion; 4.3% senior notes due May 1, 2024 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion; 4.6% senior notes due November 1, 2025 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion; 4.85% senior notes due November 1, 2028 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.30 billion; 5.3% senior notes due November 1, 2038 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion; and 5.4% senior notes due November 1, 2048 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2019, to finance a portion of our acquisition of Pinnacle, we also borrowed $1.30 billion under a term loan agreement (the "Term Loan Agreement") with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for term loans to the Company in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.30 billion. Our borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement consisted of a $650.0 million tranche of three-year term loans maturing on October 26, 2021 and a $650.0 million tranche of five-year term loans maturing on October 26, 2023.

In connection with our acquisition of Pinnacle, we prepaid in full $2.40 billion of obligations and liabilities of Pinnacle under or in respect of Pinnacle's credit agreement and other debt agreements. We also redeemed $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Pinnacle's outstanding 5.875% senior notes due January 15, 2024 and recognized a charge of $3.9 million in fiscal 2019 as a cost of early retirement of debt.

During fiscal 2019, we repaid $900.0 million of our borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement, which repayment consisted of $450.0 million of the three-year tranche loans and $450.0 million of the five-year tranche loans. During fiscal 2020, we repaid the remaining $400.0 million outstanding principal balances of our borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement, of which repayment consisted of $200.0 million of the three-year tranche loans and $200.0 million of the five-year tranche loans. The Term Loan Agreement was terminated after these repayments.

During fiscal 2020, we also redeemed the entire outstanding $525.0 million aggregate principal amount of our floating rate notes due October 22, 2020 in two separate redemptions totaling $250.0 million and $275.0 million in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2020, respectively.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, we entered into deal-contingent forward starting interest rate swap contracts (see Note 17) to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk related to our anticipated issuance of long-term debt to help finance the Pinnacle acquisition. During the second quarter of fiscal 2019, we terminated the interest rate swap contracts and received proceeds of $47.5 million. This gain was deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and is being amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the lives of the related debt instruments. Our net interest expense was reduced by $3.5 million and $2.0 million in fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, respectively, due to the impact of these interest rate swap contracts.

Other Long-Term Debt

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, we entered into an unsecured term loan agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with a financial institution. The Credit Agreement provides for delayed draw term loans to the Company in an aggregate principal amount not in excess of $600.0 million (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $750.0 million). The Credit Agreement matures on May 21, 2023. As of May 31, 2020, there were 0 outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at, at the Company's election, either (a) LIBOR plus a percentage spread (ranging from 1.125% to 1.75%) based on the Company's senior unsecured long-term indebtedness ratings or (b) the alternate base rate, described in the Credit Agreement as the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%, plus a percentage spread (ranging from 0% to 0.625%) based on the Company's senior unsecured long-term indebtedness ratings. The Company may voluntarily prepay term loans under the Credit Agreement, in whole or in part, without penalty, subject to certain conditions.

In fiscal 2018, we entered into a term loan agreement (the "Prior Term Loan Agreement") with a financial institution. The Prior Term Loan Agreement provided for term loans to the Company in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $300.0 million, maturing on February 26, 2019. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we borrowed the full amount of the $300.0 million provided for under the Prior Term Loan Agreement. During the second quarter of fiscal 2019, we repaid in full the

63


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

principal balance of all term loans outstanding under the Prior Term Loan Agreement. This did not result in a significant gain or loss.

In fiscal 2018, we repaid the remaining principal balance of $70.0 million of our 2.1% senior notes on the maturity date of March 15, 2018.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we entered into a term loan agreement (the "Term Loan Agreement") with a financial institution. The Term Loan Agreement provides for term loans to the Company in an aggregate principal amount not in excess of $300.0 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we borrowed the full amount of the $300.0 million provided for under the Term Loan Agreement. The Term Loan Agreement matures on February 26, 2019. The term loan bears interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.75% per annum and is fully prepayable without penalty.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we repaid the remaining principal balance of $119.6 million of our 1.9% senior notes on the maturity date of January 25, 2018.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we repaidand the remaining capital lease liability balance of $28.5 million in connection with the early exit of an unfavorable lease contract (see Note 8).
During the second quarter ofcontract.

In fiscal 2018, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes due October 9, 2020. The notes bear interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.50% per annum.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we repaid the remaining principal balance of $224.8 million of our 5.819% senior notes due 2017 and $248.2 million principal amount of our 7.0% senior notes due 2019, in each case prior to maturity, resulting in a net loss on early retirement of debt of $32.7 million.
In connection with the Spinoff of Lamb Weston (see Note 6), Lamb Weston issued to us $1.54 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes (the "Lamb Weston notes"). On November 9, 2016, we exchanged the Lamb Weston notes for $250.2 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.819% senior notes due 2017, $880.4 million aggregate principal amount of our 1.9% senior notes due 2018, $154.9 million aggregate principal amount of our 2.1% senior notes due 2018, $86.9 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.0% senior notes due 2019, and $71.1 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.95% senior notes due 2020 (collectively, the "Conagra notes"), which had been purchased in the open market by certain investment banks prior to the Spinoff. Following the exchange, we cancelled the Conagra notes. These actions resulted in a net loss of $60.6 million as a cost of early retirement of debt.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we repaid the entire principal balance of $550.0 million of our floating rate notes on the maturity date of July 21, 2016.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we repurchased $560.3 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2043, $341.8 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2039, $139.9 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2019, $110.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2026, $85.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2020, and $163.0 million of aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2023, in each case prior to maturity in a tender offer, resulting in a net loss of $23.9 million as a cost of early retirement of debt.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we repaid the entire principal balance of $750.0 million of our 1.30% senior notes on the maturity date of January 25, 2016. The repayment was primarily funded through the issuance of term loans totaling $600.0 million, which were repaid in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 with the proceeds from the divestiture of our Private Brands business.
See Note 6 for repayment of senior notes issued by Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. ("Ralcorp") in an aggregate principal amount of $33.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2016.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we repaid the entire principal balance of $250.0 million of our 1.35% senior notes on the maturity date of September 10, 2015.

General

Our most restrictive debt agreementsagreement (the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 5) and the Term Loan Agreement)) generally requirerequires our ratio of EBITDA (earningsearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)amortization ("EBITDA") to interest expense not to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA not to be not greater thanexceed certain decreasing specified levels, ranging from 5.25 through the first quarter of fiscal 2021 to 3.75 to 1.0 (provided that such ratio may be increased atfrom the optionsecond quarter of the Company in connectionfiscal 2023 and thereafter, with a material transaction), witheach ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we were in compliance with all financial covenants.

covenants under the Revolving Credit Facility.

Net interest expense consists of:

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Long-term debt

 

$

495.9

 

 

$

385.9

 

 

$

161.2

 

Short-term debt

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

15.0

 

 

 

4.8

 

Interest income

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

(6.8

)

 

 

(3.8

)

Interest capitalized

 

 

(6.6

)

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

(3.5

)

 

 

$

487.1

 

 

$

391.4

 

 

$

158.7

 

 2018 2017 2016
Long-term debt$161.2
 $203.6
 $302.9
Short-term debt4.8
 0.6
 1.9
Interest income(3.8) (3.7) (1.2)
Interest capitalized(3.5) (5.0) (7.8)
 $158.7
 $195.5
 $295.8

Interest paid from continuing operations was $164.5$494.6 million, $223.7$375.6 million, and $322.0$164.5 million in fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

In connection with the planned acquisition of Pinnacle (see Note 2),

5. CREDIT FACILITIES AND BORROWINGS

At May 31, 2020, we have secured $9.0 billion in fully committed bridge financing from affiliates of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. The commitments under the committed bridge financing were subsequently reduced by the amounts ofhad a term loan agreement we entered into on July 11, 2018revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility") with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for term loans to us in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.3 billion. The term loan agreement generally requires our ratio of EBITDA to interest expense to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA to not exceed certain specified levels, with each ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis. The funding under the term loan agreement is anticipated to occur simultaneously with the closing date of the acquisition. In connection with the acquisition, we expect to incur an aggregate of up to $8.3 billion of long-term debt, including for the payment of the cash portion of the merger consideration, the repayment of Pinnacle debt, the refinancing of certain Conagra debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses. The permanent financing is also expected to include approximately $600 million of incremental cash proceeds from the issuance of equity and/or divestitures. 


5. CREDIT FACILITIES AND BORROWINGS

At May 27, 2018, we had a revolving credit facility (the "Facility") with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.25$1.6 billion (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $1.75$2.1 billion with the consent of the lenders). The Revolving Credit Facility matures on February 16, 2022.July 11, 2024 and is unsecured. The term of the Revolving Credit Facility may be extended for additional one-year or two-year periods from the then-applicable maturity date on an annual basis. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, there were no0 outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Revolving Credit Facility contains events of default customary for unsecured investment grade credit facilities with corresponding grace periods. The Revolving Credit Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for unsecured investment grade credit facilities of this type. It generally requires our ratio of EBITDA to interest expense not to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA not to be not greater thanexceed certain decreasing specified levels, ranging from 5.25 through the first quarter of fiscal 2021 to 3.75 to 1.0 (provided that such ratio may be increased atfrom the optionsecond quarter of the Company in connectionfiscal 2023 and thereafter, with a material transaction), witheach ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Facility's financial covenants.


On July 11, 2018, subsequent to our fiscal year end, we entered into an amended and restated revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for a revolving credit facility in a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.6 billion (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $2.1 billion).  It replaces the existing Facility and generally requires our ratio of EBITDA to interest expense to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA to not exceed certain specified levels, with each ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Revolving Credit Facility.

We finance our short-term liquidity needs with bank borrowings, commercial paper borrowings, and bankers' acceptances. As of May 27, 2018, we had $277.0 millionThere were 0 outstanding borrowings under our commercial paper program at an average weighted interest rate of 2.08%. Asas of May 28, 2017,31, 2020 and May 26, 2019.

64


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

6. DIVESTITURES AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Lender's® Bagel Business

During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, we had $26.2completed the sale of our Lender's® bagel business for net proceeds of $33.2 million, outstanding undersubject to final working capital adjustments. The business results were previously reported primarily in our commercial paper program atRefrigerated & Frozen segment, and to a lesser extent within our Foodservice segment.

In connection with the sale of our Lender's® bagel business, we recognized an average weighted interest rateimpairment charge of 1.23%.$27.6 million within SG&A expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2020.

The assets and liabilities classified as held for sale reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the Lender's® bagel business were as follows:

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

Current assets

 

$

5.4

 

Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $19.3 million)

 

 

62.3

 

Current liabilities

 

 

0.5

 

DSD Snacks Business

During the second quarter of fiscal 2020, we completed the sale of our Direct Store Delivery ("DSD") snacks business for net proceeds of $137.5 million, including final working capital adjustments. The business results were previously reported in our Grocery & Snacks segment.

In connection with the sale of our DSD snacks business, we recognized an impairment charge of $31.4 million within SG&A expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2020.

The assets and liabilities classified as held for sale reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the DSD snacks business were as follows:


 

 

May 26, 2019

 

Current assets

 

$

21.4

 

Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $34.6 million)

 

 

156.2

 

Current liabilities

 

 

4.6

 

6. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND OTHER DIVESTITURES

Lamb Weston Spinoff

On November 9, 2016, we completed the Spinoffspinoff of our Lamb Weston business. As of such date, we did not beneficially own any equity interest in Lamb Weston and no longer consolidated Lamb Weston into our financial results. The business results were previously reported in the Commercial segment. We reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

The summary comparative financial results of the Lamb Weston business through the date of the Spinoff, includedIncluded within discontinued operations were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Net sales$
 $1,407.9
 $2,975.0
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings$(0.3) $172.3
 $474.8
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity method investment earnings(0.3) 172.3
 474.8
Income tax expense (benefit)(14.6) 87.5
 178.9
Equity method investment earnings
 15.9
 71.7
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax14.3
 100.7
 367.6
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 6.8
 9.2
Net income from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.$14.3
 $93.9
 $358.4
Duringduring fiscal 2017, we incurred $74.82019 and 2018 was an after-tax loss of $2.8 million and after-tax income of expenses in connection with the Spinoff$14.3 million, respectively, due primarily related to professional fees and contract services associated with preparation of regulatory filings and separation activities. These expenses are reflected in income from discontinued operations. During fiscal 2018, a $14.5 million income tax benefit was recorded due to an adjustment of the estimated deductibility of these costs.
In connection with the Spinoff, total assets of $2.28 billion and total liabilities of $2.98 billion (including debt of $2.46 billion) were transferred to Lamb Weston. As part of the consideration for the Spinoff, the Company received a cash payment from Lamb Weston in the amount of $823.5 million. See Note 4 for discussion of the debt-for-debt exchange related to the Spinoff.
adjustments.

We entered into a transition services agreement in connection with the Lamb Weston Spinoff and recognized $2.2 million and $4.2 million of income for the performance of services during fiscal 2018, and 2017, respectively, classified within SG&A expenses.

Private Brands Operations

On February 1, 2016, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, we completed the disposition of our Private Brands operations to TreeHouse Foods, Inc. ("Treehouse"TreeHouse") for $2.6 billion in cash on a debt-free basis.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27,. Included within discontinued operations during fiscal 2019 and 2018 May 28, 2017,was after-tax income of $0.9 million and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

As a resultan after-tax loss of the disposition, we recognized a pre-tax charge of $1.92 billion ($1.44 billion after-tax) in fiscal 2016$0.1 million, respectively, related to write-down the goodwill and long-lived assets to the final sales price, less costs to sell, and to recognize the final loss of the Private Brands business. We reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In fiscal 2016, we repaid senior notes issued by Ralcorp in an aggregate principal amount of $33.9 million, consisting of 4.95% senior notes due August 15, 2020 in an aggregate principal amount of $17.2 million (with an effective interest rate of 2.83%) and 6.625% senior notes due August 15, 2039 in total an aggregate principal amount of $16.7 million (with an effective interest rate of 4.82%), in each case, prior to maturity, resulting in a loss $5.4 million as a cost of early retirement of debt, which is reflected in discontinued operations.
The summary comparative financial results of the Private Brands business, included within discontinued operations, were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Net sales$
 $
 $2,490.6
Loss on sale of business$
 $(1.6) $
Long-lived asset impairment charges
 
 (1,923.0)
Income from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes0.4
 3.9
 168.0
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity method investment earnings0.4
 2.3
 (1,755.0)
Income tax expense (benefit)0.5
 (0.3) (593.1)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax$(0.1) $2.6
 $(1,161.9)
We entered into a transition services agreement with TreeHouse and recognized $2.2 million $16.9 million, and $8.3 million of income for the performance of services during fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, classified within SG&A expenses.
ConAgra Mills Operations
On

65


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 29, 2014, the Company, Cargill, Incorporated ("Cargill"),31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and CHS, Inc. ("CHS") completed the formation of the Ardent Mills joint venture. In connection with the formation, we contributed to Ardent Mills all of the assets of ConAgra Mills, our milling operations. Our equityMay 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in the earnings of Ardent Mills is reflected in our continuing operations.

In fiscal 2017, we adjusted a multi-employer pension withdrawal liability related to our former milling operations by $2.0 million ($1.3 million after-tax). This expense was recognized within discontinued operations.
millions except per share amounts)

Other Divestitures

During the third quarter of fiscal 2018,2020, we entered into an agreement to sellcompleted the sale of our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable businesspeanut butter manufacturing facility in Canada, which isStreator, Illinois. The sale was part of a broader initiative to optimize the Company's peanut butter business, which also included the decision to exit the manufacture and sale of private label peanut butter. The business results were previously reported primarily in our InternationalGrocery & Snacks segment, and to Bonduelle Group. The transaction was completeda lesser extent within our Foodservice segment. We received net proceeds of $24.8 million, subject to final working capital adjustments.

In connection with this divestiture, we recognized impairment charges of $23.0 million within SG&A expenses in the first quarterhalf of fiscal 2019 and was valued at approximately $43.0 million Canadian dollars, which was approximately $34.0 million U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the date of announcement. The assets of this business2020. These charges have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.

included in restructuring activities.

The assets classified as held for sale reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the exit of our private label peanut butter business were as follows:

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

Current assets

 

$

9.9

 

Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $10.3 million at May 26, 2019)

 

 

35.7

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, we completed the sale of our Italian-based frozen pasta business, Gelit, for proceeds net of cash divested of $80.1 million, including final working capital adjustments. The business results were previously reported primarily in our Refrigerated & Frozen segment. We recognized a gain on the sale of $23.1 million included within SG&A expenses.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, we completed the sale of our Wesson® oil business for net proceeds of $168.3 million, including final working capital adjustments. The business results were previously reported primarily in our Grocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent within the Foodservice and International segments. We recognized a gain on the sale of $33.1 million included within SG&A expenses.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2019, we completed the sale of our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada, were as follows:

 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Current assets$6.1
 $6.3
Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $5.8 million)11.5
 11.4

Noteswhich was previously reported in our International segment, for combined proceeds of $32.2 million. We recognized a gain on the sale of $13.2 million, included within SG&A expenses.

Other Assets Held for Sale

From time to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Endedtime, we actively market certain other assets. Balances totaling $3.1 million and $8.2 million at May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017,31, 2020 and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we signed an agreement to sell our Wesson® oil business, which is part of our Grocery & Snacks segment, to The J.M. Smucker Company ("Smucker"). During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Conagra Brands and Smucker terminated the agreement. This outcome followed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission, announced on March 5, 2018, to challenge the pending sale. The Company is still actively marketing the Wesson® oil business and expects to sell it within the next twelve months. The assets of this business26, 2019, respectively, have been reclassified as noncurrent assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.
In connection with the initial pending sale of the Wesson® oil business, we recognized an impairment charge of $27.6 million within SG&A expenses in fiscal 2017, as a production facility was not initially included in the assets to be sold, and we did not expect to recover the carrying value of this facility through future associated cash flows. Subsequentprior to the terminated agreement with Smucker, this production facility has been included in noncurrent assets held for sale.
The assets classified as held for sale reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the Wesson® oil business were as follows:
 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Current assets$37.7
 $35.5
Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $74.5 million)101.0
 102.8
During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the sales of our Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business ("Spicetec") and our JM Swank business, each of which was part of our Commercial segment, for $329.7 million and $159.3 million, respectively, in cash, net of cash included in the dispositions. We recognized pre-tax gains from the sales of $144.8 million and $52.6 million, respectively. We entered into transition services agreements in connection with the salesdisposal of these businesses and recognized $0.2 million and $1.9 million of income during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively, classified within SG&A expenses.
In addition, we are actively marketing certain other assets. These assets have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The balance of these assets classified as held for sale was $10.4 million and $14.9 million in our Corporate and Grocery & Snacks segments, respectively, at May 27, 2018 and $11.6 million and $14.6 million in our Corporate and Grocery & Snacks segments, respectively, at May 28, 2017.

individual asset groups.

7. INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES

The total carrying value of our equity method investments at the end of fiscal 20182020 and 20172019 was $776.2$798.7 million and $741.3$796.3 million, respectively. These amounts are included in other assets and reflect our 44% ownership interest in Ardent Mills and 50% ownership interests in other joint ventures. Due to differences in fiscal reporting periods, we recognized the equity method investment earnings on a lag of approximately one month.

In fiscal 2020, we had purchases from our equity method investees of $32.5 million. Total dividends received from equity method investments in fiscal 2020 were $51.4 million.

In fiscal 2019, we had purchases from our equity method investees of $39.4 million. Total dividends received from equity method investments in fiscal 2019 were $55.0 million.

In fiscal 2018, we had purchases from our equity method investeesinvestees of $34.9 million. Total dividends received from equity method investments in fiscal 2018 were $62.5 million.

In fiscal 2017, we had purchases from our equity method investees of$41.8 million. Total dividends received from equity method investments in fiscal 2017 were $68.2 million.
In fiscal 2016, we had sales to and purchases from our equity method investees of $1.6 million and $61.2 million, respectively. Total dividends received from equity method investments in fiscal 2016 were $40.4 million.
We entered into transition services agreements in connection with the Ardent Mills formation and recognized $0.1 million and $9.7 million of income for the performance of transition services during fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively, classified within SG&A expenses.

66


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)


Summarized combined financial information for our equity method investments on a 100% basis is as follows:

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net Sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ardent Mills

 

$

3,393.9

 

 

$

3,476.0

 

 

$

3,344.1

 

Others

 

 

225.0

 

 

 

195.4

 

 

 

198.8

 

Total net sales

 

$

3,618.9

 

 

$

3,671.4

 

 

$

3,542.9

 

Gross margin:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ardent Mills

 

$

313.1

 

 

$

281.9

 

 

$

386.5

 

Others

 

 

49.4

 

 

 

45.5

 

 

 

34.8

 

Total gross margin

 

$

362.5

 

 

$

327.4

 

 

$

421.3

 

Earnings after income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ardent Mills

 

$

144.5

 

 

$

151.9

 

 

$

197.0

 

Others

 

 

19.3

 

 

 

18.1

 

 

 

10.1

 

Total earnings after income taxes

 

$

163.8

 

 

$

170.0

 

 

$

207.1

 

 

 

May 31,

2020

 

 

May 26,

2019

 

Ardent Mills:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

$

1,010.6

 

 

$

952.6

 

Noncurrent assets

 

 

1,720.2

 

 

 

1,669.8

 

Current liabilities

 

 

454.8

 

 

 

361.2

 

Noncurrent liabilities

 

 

503.4

 

 

 

496.9

 

Others:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

$

87.1

 

 

$

89.2

 

Noncurrent assets

 

 

24.5

 

 

 

19.0

 

Current liabilities

 

 

44.1

 

 

 

43.4

 

Noncurrent liabilities

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

0.7

 

 2018 2017 2016
Net Sales:     
Ardent Mills$3,344.1
 $3,180.0
 $3,395.3
Others198.8
 177.7
 167.2
Total net sales$3,542.9
 $3,357.7
 $3,562.5
Gross margin:    

Ardent Mills$386.5
 $340.3
 $339.2
Others34.8
 34.6
 32.8
Total gross margin$421.3
 $374.9
 $372.0
Earnings after income taxes:    

Ardent Mills$197.0
 $152.0
 $142.9
Others10.1
 10.1
 6.4
Total earnings after income taxes$207.1
 $162.1
 $149.3
 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Ardent Mills:   
Current assets$974.6
 $937.2
Noncurrent assets1,675.7
 1,694.2
Current liabilities355.6
 388.9
Noncurrent liabilities510.9
 518.0
Others:   
Current assets$76.4
 $75.5
Noncurrent assets15.5
 12.2
Current liabilities37.5
 44.5
Noncurrent liabilities0.1
 

8. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated
We lease or leased certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased. The lease agreements also contain contingent put options (the "lease put options") that allow or allowed the lessors to require us to purchase the buildings at the greater of original construction cost, or fair market value, without a lease agreement in place (the "put price") in certain limited circumstances. As a result of substantial impairment charges related to our divested Private Brands operations, these lease put options became exercisable. During fiscal 2016, we entered into a series of related transactions in which we exchanged a warehouse we owned in Indiana for two buildings and parcels of land that we leased as part of our Omaha corporate offices. Concurrent with the asset exchange, the leases on the two Omaha corporate buildings, which were subject to contingent put options, were canceled. We recognized aggregate charges of $55.6 million for the early termination of these leases. We also entered into a lease for the warehouse in Indiana and we recorded a financing lease obligation of $74.2 million. During fiscal 2017, one of these lease agreements expired. As a result of this expiration, we reversed the applicable accrual and recognized a benefit of $6.7 million in SG&A expenses. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we purchased two buildings that were subject to lease put options and recognized net losses totaling $48.2 million for the early exit of unfavorable lease contracts.
As of May 27, 2018, there was one remaining leased building subject to a lease put option for which the put option price exceeded the estimated fair value of the property by $8.2 million, of which we had accrued $1.2 million. We are amortizing the difference between the put price and the estimated fair value (without a lease agreement in place) of the property over the remaining lease term within SG&A expenses. This lease is accounted for as an operating lease, and accordingly, there are no material assets and liabilities, other than the accrued portion of the put price, associated with this entity included in the

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this entity. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreement, the expected remaining useful life of the asset leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entity.

9. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal 20182020 and 20172019 was as follows:

 

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

 

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

International

 

 

Foodservice

 

 

Total

 

Balance as of May 27, 2018

 

$

2,582.5

 

 

$

1,080.6

 

 

$

242.9

 

 

$

571.1

 

 

$

4,477.1

 

Acquisitions

 

 

2,157.3

 

 

 

4,561.8

 

 

 

61.3

 

 

 

181.6

 

 

 

6,962.0

 

Purchase accounting adjustments

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

 

Currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(5.2

)

Balance as of May 26, 2019

 

$

4,741.3

 

 

$

5,642.4

 

 

$

299.0

 

 

$

752.7

 

 

$

11,435.4

 

Purchase accounting adjustments

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

Currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(9.2

)

Balance as of May 31, 2020

 

$

4,744.8

 

 

$

5,648.3

 

 

$

290.5

 

 

$

752.7

 

 

$

11,436.3

 

 Grocery & Snacks Refrigerated & Frozen International Foodservice Total
Balance as of May 29, 2016$2,273.1
 $1,028.9
 $442.8
 $571.1
 $4,315.9
Impairment
 
 (198.9) 
 (198.9)
Acquisitions166.0
 8.3
 
 
 174.3
Currency translation
 0.1
 3.9
 
 4.0
Balance as of May 28, 2017$2,439.1
 $1,037.3
 $247.8
 $571.1
 $4,295.3
Acquisitions155.2
 57.8
 
 
 213.0
Purchase accounting adjustments(1.5) 
 
 
 (1.5)
Currency translation
 0.6
 (4.9) 
 (4.3)
Balance as of May 27, 2018$2,592.8
 $1,095.7
 $242.9
 $571.1
 $4,502.5

67


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Other identifiable intangible assets were as follows:

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

Non-amortizing intangible assets

 

$

3,396.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,559.6

 

 

$

 

Amortizing intangible assets

 

 

1,239.4

 

 

 

319.8

 

 

 

1,239.9

 

 

 

260.2

 

 

 

$

4,635.5

 

 

$

319.8

 

 

$

4,799.5

 

 

$

260.2

 

During the first quarter fiscal 2020, we reorganized our reporting segments to incorporate the Pinnacle business into our legacy reporting segments to reflect how the business is now being managed. Accordingly, we reassigned goodwill from the legacy Pinnacle segment to the applicable reporting units of the legacy Conagra segments, consistent with the Company's new management structure. The allocation of goodwill to Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, International, and Foodservice was $2.19 billion, $4.58 billion, $58.5 million, and $181.6 million, respectively, inclusive of goodwill related to businesses divested in fiscal 2020. We tested goodwill for impairment both prior to and subsequent to the reallocation of Pinnacle goodwill and there were 0 impairments of goodwill. Such impairment tests are performed by estimating the fair value of each reporting unit and comparing that to the carrying amount of the net assets of the applicable reporting unit. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, such deficit is recognized as an impairment of goodwill.

Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis which requires us to estimate the future cash flows as well as to select a risk-adjusted discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. When determining future cash flow estimates, we consider historical results adjusted to reflect current and anticipated operating conditions. We estimate cash flows for a reporting unit over a discrete period (typically five years) and a terminal period (considering expected long-term growth rates and trends). With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we used a discount rate for our domestic reporting units of 7% and rates ranging from 8% to 11% for our International reporting units. We used terminal growth rates between 1% and 2% for all reporting units (excluding one international reporting unit with a 3% terminal growth rate). Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates in such areas as future economic conditions, industry-specific conditions, product pricing, and necessary capital expenditures. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows, discount rates, or terminal growth rates could produce substantially different estimates of the fair value of the reporting units.

Several of our reporting units have an estimated fair value substantially in excess of the carrying value. Three of our reporting units with aggregate goodwill of $3.49 billion have an estimated fair value that exceeds the respective carrying value as of our most recent quantitative testing date in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 as follows:  

 

 

Carrying Value of Goodwill

 

 

Excess Fair Value as of Fiscal 2020 Test Date

 

Sides, Components, Enhancers (part of Refrigerated & Frozen segment)

 

$

2,636.6

 

 

 

18.1

%

Foodservice

 

 

752.7

 

 

 

36.7

%

Canada (part of International segment)

 

 

96.2

 

 

 

32.0

%

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, we performed our annual goodwill impairment assessment on all of our reporting units and found no indicators of impairment. We completed a qualitative assessment which considered, among other things, an increase in our market capitalization from our previous testing date, the current interest rate environment, and recent events which have had a positive impact on our financial results for most of our reporting units. While retail sales have increased due to higher than anticipated consumer demand for our products, our Foodservice segment has experienced a negative impact from shelter in place mandates limiting access to away-from-home establishments. Due to the temporary nature of the shelter in place orders, we determined that there was no impairment triggering event as it was not more likely than not that the fair value of this reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Given the evolving nature and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will continue to evaluate the impact on our reporting units as changes to these assumptions could result in future impairments.

Amortizing intangible assets, carrying a remaining weighted-average life of approximately 20 years, are principally composed of customer relationships and acquired intellectual property. For fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, we recognized amortization expense of $59.8 million, $49.1 million, and $34.9 million, respectively. Based on amortizing assets recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 31, 2020, amortization expense for the next five years is estimated to be as follows:

68


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

2021

 

$

59.7

 

2022

 

 

59.7

 

2023

 

 

57.4

 

2024

 

 

54.1

 

2025

 

 

53.9

 

 2018 2017
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
Non-amortizing intangible assets$918.3
 $
 $829.7
 $
Amortizing intangible assets579.4
 213.2
 573.5
 179.5
 $1,497.7
 $213.2
 $1,403.2
 $179.5

For our non-amortizing intangible assets, which are comprised of brands and trademarks, we use a "relief from royalty" methodology in estimating fair value. During the first quarter of fiscal 2020, we recorded impairment charges totaling $19.3 million within our Refrigerated & Frozen segment and Grocery & Snacks segment for certain brands for which management changed its business strategy and that continued to have lower than expected sales and profit margins. This impairment was included within SG&A expenses.

During fiscal 2018,2020, as a result of our annual impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles, we recognized impairment charges in SG&A expenses of $146.2 million, primarily within our Grocery & Snacks and Refrigerated & Frozen segments, largely associated with brands that were recorded at fair value in recent acquisitions. The more notable brands with impairments include Frontera®, Gardein®, Glutino®, Hungry Man®, and Udi’s®. While most of our recently acquired brands continue to remain on track with previous assumptions, these brands have had lower than expected sales or profit margins which have led to some revisions in our original assumptions (most notably declines in our assumed royalty rates).     

During fiscal 2020, in conjunction with the divestiture of our Direct Store Delivery ("DSD") snacks business, our Lender’s® bagel business, and the exit of our private label peanut butter business, we reclassified $3.0$64.2 million and $9.2$122.1 million of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets, respectively, to noncurrent assets held for sale for all periods presented in conjunction withprior to the then pending divestituresdivestiture.

During fiscal 2019, as a result of the Del Monteour annual impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles, we recognized impairment charges of $76.5 million for our Chef Boyardee® processed fruit and vegetable businessRed Fork® brands in Canadaour Grocery & Snacks segment. We also recognized impairment charges of $13.1 million for our Aylmer® and our WessonSundrop® oil business.

brands in our International segment.

During fiscal 2018, as a result of our annual impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles, we recognized impairment charges of $4.0 million for our HK Anderson®, Red Fork®, and Salpica® brands in our Grocery & Snacks segment. We also recognized an impairment charge of $0.8 million for our Aylmer® brand in our International segment.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, in anticipation of the Spinoff, we changed our reporting segments. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we were required to determine new reporting units at a lower level (at the operating segment or one level lower, as applicable). When such a determination was made, we were required to perform a goodwill impairment analysis for each of the new reporting units.
We performed an assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Canadian reporting unit within the new International reporting segment. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans and future industry and economic conditions. We estimated the future cash flows of the Canadian reporting unit and calculated the net present value of those estimated cash flows using a risk adjusted discount rate, in order to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit from the perspective of a market participant. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 7.5% and 2%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

value in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly, during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $139.2 million for the impairment of goodwill.
As part of the assessment of the fair value of each asset and liability within the Canadian reporting unit, with the assistance of the third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of our Canadian Del Monte® brand to be less than its carrying value. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we also recognized an impairment charge during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 of $24.4 million to write-down the intangible asset to its estimated fair value.
We also performed an assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit within the International reporting segment using similar methods to those described above. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We determined that the estimated fair value of this reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of its net assets by approximately 5%. Accordingly, we did not recognize an impairment of the goodwill in the Mexican reporting unit.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, as a result of further deterioration in forecasted sales and profits primarily due to foreign exchange rates, we performed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value in the second quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly, during the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $43.9 million for the impairment of goodwill.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, in conjunction with our annual impairment testing, we adopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. As a result of further deterioration in forecasted sales and profits, we performed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 9.0% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the reporting unit. We recognized an impairment charge of $15.8 million, equal to the difference between the carrying value and estimated fair value of the reporting unit.
In fiscal 2017, due to declining sales of certain brands, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles of those brands. During fiscal 2017, we recognized impairment charges of $7.1 million for our Del Monte®brand and $5.5 million for our Aylmer® brand in our International segment. We also recognized impairment charges of $67.1 million for our Chef Boyardee® brand and $1.1 million for our Fiddle Faddle® brand in our Grocery & Snacks segment.
During fiscal 2016, we also elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles and recognized an impairment charge of $50.1 million in our Grocery & Snacks segment for our Chef Boyardee® brand.
See Note 6 for a discussion of impairments related to discontinued operations.
Non-amortizing intangible assets are comprised of brands and trademarks.
Amortizing intangible assets, carrying a remaining weighted average life of approximately 14 years, are principally composed of customer relationships, licensing arrangements, and acquired intellectual property. For fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, we recognized amortization expense of $34.9 million, $33.6 million, and $34.6 million, respectively. Based on amortizing assets recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 27, 2018, amortization expense is estimated to average $32.8 million for each of the next five years, with a high expense of $33.3 million in fiscal year 2019 and decreasing to a low expense of $30.9 million in fiscal year 2023.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we entered into an agreement for the use of certain intellectual property and recorded an amortizing intangible asset of $92.8 million, for which cash payments of $14.4 million, $14.9 million, and $10.4 million were made in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Remaining payments will be made over a four-year period.

10.

9. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated on the basis of weighted average outstanding shares of common stock. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding shares of common stock adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and other dilutive securities.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2019, we issued 77.5 million shares of our common stock out of treasury to the former shareholders of Pinnacle pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. In addition, we issued 16.3 million shares of our common stock, par value $5.00 per share, in an underwritten public offering in connection with the financing of the Pinnacle acquisition, with net proceeds of $555.7 million (see Note 2).

69


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table reconciles the income and average share amounts used to compute both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

$

840.1

 

 

$

680.2

 

 

$

794.1

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

14.3

 

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

$

840.1

 

 

$

678.3

 

 

$

808.4

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

487.3

 

 

 

444.0

 

 

 

403.9

 

Add: Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and other dilutive securities

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

3.5

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

488.6

 

 

 

445.6

 

 

 

407.4

 

 2018 2017 2016
Net income (loss) available to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders:     
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$794.1
 $544.1
 $126.6
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders14.3
 95.2
 (803.6)
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$808.4
 $639.3
 $(677.0)
Less: Increase in redemption value of noncontrolling interests in excess of earnings allocated
 0.8
 4.8
Net income (loss) available to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$808.4
 $638.5
 $(681.8)
Weighted average shares outstanding:     
Basic weighted average shares outstanding403.9
 431.9
 434.4
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and other dilutive securities3.5
 4.1
 4.1
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding407.4
 436.0
 438.5

For fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, there were 1.31.9 million, 0.82.0 million, and 0.41.3 million stock options outstanding, respectively, that were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares because the effect was antidilutive.


11.

10. INVENTORIES

The major classes of inventories were as follows:

 

 

May 31, 2020

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

Raw materials and packaging

 

$

291.6

 

 

$

272.9

 

Work in process

 

 

125.2

 

 

 

126.9

 

Finished goods

 

 

887.8

 

 

 

1,083.1

 

Supplies and other

 

 

73.3

 

 

 

66.0

 

Total

 

$

1,377.9

 

 

$

1,548.9

 

 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Raw materials and packaging$206.2
 $182.1
Work in process92.4
 91.9
Finished goods651.1
 606.6
Supplies and other47.4
 47.3
Total$997.1
 $927.9


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

12.

11. OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

Other noncurrent liabilities consisted of:

 

 

May 31, 2020

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

Postretirement health care and pension obligations

 

$

324.9

 

 

$

262.5

 

Noncurrent income tax liabilities

 

 

1,330.1

 

 

 

1,349.0

 

Noncurrent lease liabilities

 

 

206.1

 

 

 

 

Self-insurance liabilities

 

 

37.5

 

 

 

42.9

 

Environmental liabilities (see Note 16)

 

 

61.5

 

 

 

56.8

 

Legal settlement costs (see Note 16)

 

 

63.1

 

 

 

74.1

 

Technology agreement liability

 

 

14.6

 

 

 

28.7

 

Other

 

 

127.3

 

 

 

137.8

 

 

 

$

2,165.1

 

 

$

1,951.8

 

 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Postretirement health care and pension obligations$261.7
 $709.8
Noncurrent income tax liabilities490.4
 466.5
Self-insurance liabilities27.1
 29.0
Environmental liabilities (see Note 17)56.0
 54.7
Technology agreement liability (see Note 9)42.7
 56.4
Other187.3
 212.4
 $1,065.2
 $1,528.8

13.

12. CAPITAL STOCK

The total number of shares we are authorized to issue is 1,218,050,000 shares, which shares may be issued as follows: 1,200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $5.00 per share; 150,000 shares of Class B Preferred Stock, par value $50.00 per share; 250,000 shares of Class C Preferred Stock, par value $100.00 per share; 1,100,000 shares of Class D Preferred

70


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Stock, no par value per share; and 16,550,000 shares of Class E Preferred Stock, no par value per share. There were no0 preferred shares issued or outstanding as of May 27, 2018.

31, 2020.

We have repurchased our shares of common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors.Board. In October 2016,May 2018, our Board of Directors approved a $1.25 billionan increase to our share repurchase authorization. The Board of Directors approved further increases to the share repurchase programauthorization of $1.0 billion each in May 2017 and May 2018.billion. We repurchased 27.4 million shares of our common stock for approximately $967.3 million and 25.1 million shares of our common stock for approximately $1.0 billion in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively, under this program.


14.

13. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

In accordance with stockholder-approved equity incentive plans, we issue share-based payments under variousgrant stock-based compensation arrangements,awards, including stock options, restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, performance shares, performance-based restricted stock units, stock options, and other share-based awards.stock appreciation rights. The shares to be delivered upon vesting or lapse of restriction under the planany such arrangement may consist, in whole or part, of treasury stock or authorized but unissued stock, not reserved for any other purpose.

On September 19, 2014, theour stockholders approved the Conagra Brands, Inc. 2014 Stock Plan (the "Plan"), which was(as amended oneffective December 11, 2017. As amended,2017, the "Plan"). The Plan authorizedauthorizes the issuance of up to 40.3 million shares of Conagra Brands common stock as well asstock. In addition to the shares under the 2014 Stock Plan, certain shares of Conagra Brands common stock subject to outstanding awards under predecessor stock plans that expire, lapse, are cancelled, terminated, forfeited, or otherwise become unexercisable.unexercisable, or are settled for cash are available for issuance. At May 27, 2018,31, 2020, approximately 42.540.6 million shares were reserved for granting additional options,new share-based awards.

Share Unit Awards

In accordance with stockholder-approved equity incentive plans, we grant awards of restricted stock units and cash-settled restricted stock units performance shares, or other share-based awards.

All amounts below are of continuing and discontinued operations.
Share Unit Plans
In accordance with stockholder-approved plans, we issue stock under various stock-based compensation arrangements, including restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, and other share-based awards ("share units"). to employees and directors. These awards generally have requisite service periods of three years. Under each arrangement,such award, stock or cash (as applicable) is issued without direct cost to the employee. We estimate the fair value of the share units based upon the market price of our stock at the date of grant. Certain share unit grants do not provide for the payment of dividend equivalents to the participant during the requisite service period (vesting period)(the "vesting period"). For those grants, the value of the grants is reduced by the net present value of the foregone dividend equivalent payments.

We recognize compensation expense for share unit awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, accounting for forfeitures as they occur. All cash-settled restricted stock units are marked-to-market and presented within


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

other current and noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The compensation expense for our stock-settled share unit awards totaled $21.8$24.5 million, $18.2 million, and $25.1 million for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, including discontinued operations of $1.4$23.9 million, and $3.9$21.8 million for fiscal 20172020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. The tax benefit related to the stock-settled share unit award compensation expense for fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018 was $5.3 million, $6.0 million, and $7.2 million, $7.0 million, and $9.6 million, respectively.The compensation expense for our cash-settled share unit awards totaled $5.8$4.2 million, $20.9$17.5 million, and $33.9 million for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, including discontinued operations of $2.6 million and $7.4$5.8 million for fiscal 20172020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. The tax benefit related to the cash-settled share unit award compensation expense for fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018 was $1.1 million, $4.4 million, and $1.9 million, $8.0respectively.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2019, in connection with the completion of the Pinnacle acquisition, we granted 2.0 million and $13.0 million, respectively. No cash-settled share unit awards at a grant date fair value of $36.37 per share unit to Pinnacle employees in replacement of their unvested restricted share unit awards that were outstanding as of the closing date. Included in the compensation expense described above for fiscal 2020 and 2019 is expense of $1.0 million and $18.9 million, respectively, for accelerated vesting of awards related to Pinnacle integration restructuring activities, net of the impact of marking-to-market these awards based on a lower market price of shares of Conagra Brands common stock. Approximately $36.3 million of the fair value of the replacement share unit awards granted to Pinnacle employees was attributable to pre-combination service and was included in the purchase price and established as a liability. Included in the fiscal 2018.

2020 and 2019 expense for cash-settled share unit awards above is expense of $0.2 million and income of $6.7 million, respectively, related to the mark-to-market of this liability. As of May 31, 2020, our liability for the replacement awards was $3.4 million, which includes post-combination service expense, the mark-to-market of the liability, and the impact of payouts since completing the Pinnacle acquisition. Post-combination expense of approximately $0.8 million, based on the market price of shares of Conagra Brands common stock as of May 31, 2020, is expected to be recognized related to the replacement awards over the remaining post-combination service period of approximately one year.

71


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table summarizes the nonvested share units as of May 27, 201831, 2020 and changes during the fiscal year then ended:

 

 

Stock-Settled

 

 

Cash-Settled

 

Share Units

 

Share Units

(in Millions)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Grant-Date

Fair Value

 

 

Share Units

(in Millions)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Grant-Date

Fair Value

 

Nonvested share units at May 26, 2019

 

 

1.81

 

 

$

34.89

 

 

 

0.97

 

 

$

36.20

 

Granted

 

 

1.25

 

 

$

28.32

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Vested/Issued

 

 

(0.49

)

 

$

34.43

 

 

 

(0.84

)

 

$

36.17

 

Forfeited

 

 

(0.19

)

 

$

31.60

 

 

 

(0.01

)

 

$

36.24

 

Nonvested share units at May 31, 2020

 

 

2.38

 

 

$

31.76

 

 

 

0.12

 

 

$

36.37

 

 Stock-settled Cash-settled
Share Units
Share Units
(in Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 
Share Units
(in Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Nonvested share units at May 28, 20171.56
 $31.59
 1.21
 $30.52
Granted0.87
 $34.16
 
 $
Vested/Issued(0.53) $26.58
 (0.42) $22.86
Forfeited(0.12) $33.77
 (0.08) $34.60
Nonvested share units at May 27, 20181.78
 $34.20
 0.71
 $34.58

During fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, we granted 1.3 million, 0.9 million, 0.6 million, and 1.00.9 million stock-settled share units, respectively, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $28.32, $35.43, and $34.16 $46.79, and $43.64,per share unit, respectively. During fiscal 2017 and 2016, we granted 0.4 million and 0.8 millionNaN cash-settled share units, respectively, with a weighted average grant date value of $48.07 and $44.48, respectively.

unit awards were granted in fiscal 2020 or 2018.

The total intrinsic value of stock-settled share units vested was $18.5$14.2 million, $27.0$24.6 million, and $48.8$18.5 million during fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. The total intrinsic value of cash-settled share units vested was $14.2$24.3 million, $24.0$50.5 million, and $44.9$14.2 million during fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

At May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we had $22.8$27.9 million and $5.2$0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years and 1.0 year,0.9 years, related to stock-settled share unit awards and cash-settled share unit awards, respectively.

Performance-Based

Performance Share Plan

PerformanceAwards

In accordance with stockholder-approved equity incentive plans, we grant performance shares are granted to selected executives and other key employees with vesting contingent upon meeting various Company-wide performance goals. The performance goal for one-third of the target number of performance sharesgoals for the three-year performance periodperiods ending in fiscal 20182020 (the "2018"2020 performance period") is, fiscal 2021 ("2021 performance period"), and fiscal 2022 ("2022 performance period") are based on our fiscal 2016 EBITDA return on capital, subject to certain adjustments. Another one-third of the target number of performance shares granted for the 2018 performance period is based on our fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital, subject to certain adjustments. The fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital target, when set, excluded the results of Lamb Weston. The performance goal for the last one-third of the target number of performance shares granted for the 2018 performance period is based on our fiscal 2018 diluted earnings per share ("EPS") compound annual growth rate, ("CAGR"), subject to certain adjustments. In addition, for certain participants, all performance shares for the 2018 performance period are subject to an overarching EPS goal that must be met in each fiscal year of the 2018 performance period before any pay out can be made to such participants on the performance shares.

The performance goal for one-third of the target number of performance shares for the three-year performance period ending in fiscal 2019 (the "2019 performance period") is based on our fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital, subject to certain adjustments. The fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital target, when set, excluded the results of Lamb Weston. The performance goal for the final two-thirds of the target number of performance shares granted for the 2019 performance period is based on our diluted EPS CAGR, subject to certain adjustments, measured over the two-year period ending in fiscal 2019. In addition,

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

for certain participants, all performance shares for the 2019 performance period are subject to an overarching EPS goal that must be met in each fiscal year of the 2019 performance period before any pay out can be made to such participants on the performance shares.
The performance goal for the three-year performance period ending in fiscal 2020 is based on our diluted EPS CAGR, subject to certain adjustments, measured over the defined performance period.periods. In addition, for certain participants, all performance shares for the 2020 performance period are subject to an overarching EPS goal that must be met in each fiscal year of the 2020 performance period before any pay outpayout on the performance shares can be made to such participantsparticipants. For each of the 2020 performance period, 2021 performance period, and 2022 performance period, the awards actually earned will range from 0 to two hundred percent of the targeted number of performance shares for such performance period. Dividend equivalents are paid on the portion of performance shares.
shares actually earned at our regular dividend rate in additional shares of common stock.

Awards, if earned, will be paid in shares of our common stock. Subject to limited exceptions set forth in theour performance share plan, any shares earned will be distributed after the end of the performance period, and only if the participant continues to be employed with the Company through the date of distribution. For awards where performance against the performance target has not been certified, the value of the performance shares is adjusted based upon the market price of our common stock and current forecasted performance against the performance targets at the end of each reporting period and amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period. Forfeitures are accounted for as they occur.

72


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

A summary of the activity for performance share awards as of May 27, 201831, 2020 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below:

Performance Shares

 

Share Units

(in Millions)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Grant-Date

Fair Value

 

Nonvested performance shares at May 26, 2019

 

 

1.15

 

 

$

34.89

 

Granted

 

 

0.60

 

 

$

28.41

 

Adjustments for performance results attained and dividend equivalents

 

 

0.04

 

 

$

34.94

 

Vested/Issued

 

 

(0.29

)

 

$

34.94

 

Forfeited

 

 

(0.01

)

 

$

32.60

 

Nonvested performance shares at May 31, 2020

 

 

1.49

 

 

$

32.27

 

Performance Shares
Share Units
(in Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Nonvested performance shares at May 28, 20170.86
 $29.23
Granted0.48
 $33.82
Adjustments for performance results attained and dividend equivalents0.01
 $22.98
Vested/Issued(0.33) $24.08
Forfeited(0.02) $33.69
Nonvested performance shares at May 27, 20181.00
 $33.40

The compensation expense for our performance share awards totaled $11.8$31.8 million, $13.3$8.2 million, and $14.2$11.8 million for fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. The tax benefit related to the compensation expense for fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018 2017,was $2.9 million, $2.1 million, and 2016 was $3.9 million, $5.1 million, and $5.4 million, respectively.

The total intrinsic value of share unitsperformance shares vested (including shares paid in lieu of dividends) during fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018 2017,was $8.4 million, $15.7 million, and 2016 was $11.2 million, $2.8 million, and $12.7 million, respectively.

Based on estimates at May 27, 2018, the Company31, 2020, we had $15.6$17.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to performance shares that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards

On April 15, 2019 (the "grant date"), we made grants of performance-based restricted stock unit ("PBRSU") awards to the Company's named executive officers and a limited group of other senior officers of the Company. A total of 0.2 million PBRSU awards were granted with a grant date fair value of $41.82 per PBRSU.

The PBRSU awards are awards of share units with vesting contingent on our achievement of certain absolute total shareholder return performance ("TSR") goals over a performance period beginning on the grant date and ending May 27, 2022 (the "PBRSU performance period"). If PBRSUs are earned based on absolute TSR and absolute TSR meets or exceeds a predetermined rate, they become eligible for an upward adjustment of 25% based on our relative TSR for the PBRSU performance period versus the median TSR of the S&P 500 Index ("RTSR"). Each PBRSU award payout can range from 0% to 500% of the initial target grant and will not exceed 8.6 times the grant value of each grantee's PBRSU award (including earned dividend equivalents).

Compensation expense for the awards is recognized over the PBRSU performance period based upon the grant date fair value. The grant date fair value was estimated using a Monte-Carlo simulation model with a risk-free rate of 2.35% and an expected volatility of 24.92%. The model includes no expected dividend yield as the PBRSUs earn dividend equivalents.

We recognize compensation expense using the straight-line method over the requisite service period, accounting for forfeitures as they occur. The compensation expense for our PBRSU awards totaled $2.7 million and $0.3 million for fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, respectively. The tax benefit related to the compensation expense for fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019 was $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Based on estimates at May 31, 2020, we had $4.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the PBRSU awards that will be recognized over a period of 2 years.

Stock Option Plan

We haveAwards

In accordance with stockholder-approved stock optionequity incentive plans, that provide for granting ofwe granted stock options to employees and directors for the purchase of common stock at prices equal to theits fair value at the date of grant. OptionsStock options become exercisable under various vesting schedules (typically three years) and generally expire seven to ten years after the date of grant. NoNaN stock options were granted in fiscal 2020, 2019, or 2018.

The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for stock options granted:
 2017 2016
Expected volatility (%)19.15 17.88
Dividend yield (%)2.33 2.74
Risk-free interest rates (%)1.03 1.60
Expected life of stock option (years)4.94 4.96

73


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)


The expected volatility is based on the historical market volatility of our stock over the expected life of the stock options granted. The expected life represents the period of time that the awards are expected to be outstanding and is based on the contractual term of each instrument, taking into account employees' historical exercise and termination behavior.

A summary of the option activity as of May 27, 201831, 2020 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below:

Options

 

Number

of Options

(in Millions)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

 

 

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term

(Years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value (in

Millions)

 

Outstanding at May 26, 2019

 

 

4.4

 

 

$

29.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(0.5

)

 

$

20.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3.8

 

Expired

 

 

(0.1

)

 

$

34.57

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at May 31, 2020

 

 

3.8

 

 

$

30.07

 

 

 

4.92

 

 

$

19.0

 

Exercisable at May 31, 2020

 

 

3.8

 

 

$

30.07

 

 

 

4.92

 

 

$

19.0

 

Options
Number
of Options
(in Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (in
Millions)
Outstanding at May 28, 20176.3
 $27.12
    
Exercised(1.1) $22.28
   $15.8
Forfeited(0.1) $34.78
    
Outstanding at May 27, 20185.1
 $28.11
 5.76 $47.6
Exercisable at May 27, 20184.0
 $26.34
 5.14 $44.4

We recognize compensation expense using the straight-line method over the requisite service period, accounting for forfeitures as they occur. During fiscal 2017 and 2016, the Company granted 1.1 million options and 1.6 million options, respectively, with a weighted average grant date value of $6.12 and $5.08, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $15.8$3.8 million, $29.8$7.9 million, and $165.6$15.8 million for fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. The closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day of fiscal 20182020 was $37.41$34.79 per share.

Compensation expense for stock option awards totaled $4.2$0.2 million, $6.2$2.2 million, and $9.4$4.2 million for fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016, respectively, including discontinued operations of $0.2 million and $0.8 million for fiscal 2017 and 2016,2018, respectively. Included in the compensation expense for stock option awards for fiscal 2019 and 2018 2017, and 2016 was $0.4 million, $0.9$0.2 million and $1.0$0.4 million, respectively, related to stock options granted by a subsidiary in the subsidiary's shares to the subsidiary's employees. The tax benefit related to the stock option expense for fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018 2017,was $0.1 million, $0.5 million, and 2016 was $1.4 million, $2.4 million, and $3.6 million, respectively.

At May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we had $2.3 million of total0 unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.9 years.

options.

Cash received from stock option exercises for the fiscal years ended May 27,2020, 2019, and 2018 May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016 was $25.1$11.0 million, $84.4$12.4 million, and $228.7$25.1 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercises totaled $5.3$1.4 million, $19.5$2.3 million, and $57.3$5.3 million for fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.


15. PRE-TAX INCOME AND INCOME TAXES
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Stock Appreciation Rights Awards

During the second quarter of 2017 (the "Tax Act") was enacted into law on December 22, 2017. The changes to U.S. tax law include, but are not limited to, (1) reducingfiscal 2019, in connection with the federal statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%; (2) requiring companies to paycompletion of the Pinnacle acquisition, we granted 2.3 million cash-settled stock appreciation rights with a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries; (3) repealing the exception for deductibility of performance-based compensation to covered employees, along with expanding the number of covered employees; and (4) allowing immediate expensing of machinery and equipment contracted for purchase after September 27, 2017.

The Tax Act also establishes new tax provisions that will affect our fiscal year 2019, including, but not limited to, (1) eliminating the deduction for domestic manufacturing activities; (2) generally eliminating U.S. federal income taxes on dividends from foreign subsidiaries; (3) establishingfair value estimated at closing date using a new minimum tax on Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI"), a new Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax,Black-Scholes option-pricing model and a new U.S. corporate deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission released Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118, which allows for a measurement period upgrant date price of $36.37 per share to one year after the enactment datePinnacle employees in replacement of their unvested stock option awards that were outstanding as of the Tax Actclosing date. Approximately $14.8 million of the fair value of the replacement awards granted to finalizePinnacle employees was attributable to pre-combination service and was included in the purchase price and established as a liability. As of May 31, 2020, there were 0 remaining stock appreciation rights.

The compensation income for our cash-settled stock appreciation rights totaled $0.3 million and $13.7 million for fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, respectively. Included in this amount for fiscal 2019 is income of $14.0 million related income tax impacts. Although our accountingto the mark-to-market of the liability established in connection with the Pinnacle acquisition and expense of $0.2 million for accelerated vesting of awards related to Pinnacle integration restructuring activities, net of the impact of the Tax Act is incomplete, we have made reasonable estimatesmarking-to-market these awards based on a lower market price of Conagra common shares. The related tax expense for fiscal 2020 and recorded provisional amounts for items impacted including, among others, the following:


fiscal 2019 was $0.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively.

74


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)


We remeasured deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse and recorded a provisional net benefit of $241.6 million. In addition, as a result

A summary of the Tax Act we recorded a provisional benefit of $3.2 million related to the release of valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets that are more likely than not to be realized. The release of valuation allowance was refined by a $0.5 million increasestock appreciation rights activity as of May 27, 2018 from our initial estimate made in our third quarter of fiscal 2018 in accordance with SAB 118.

We computed a provisional tax of approximately $19.8 million related to31, 2020 and changes during the application of the one-time transition tax on the net accumulated post-1986 earnings and profits of foreign subsidiaries. The transition tax was refined by a $4.6 million increase as of May 27, 2018 from our initial estimate made in our third quarter of fiscal 2018 in accordance with SAB 118.
We have not yet completed our analysis of the GILTI tax rules and are still evaluating whether to make a policy election to treat the GILTI tax as a period expense or to provide U.S. deferred taxes on certain foreign differences between the financial statement and tax basis of foreign assets and liabilities. At May 27, 2018, we did not record a deferred tax liability for these differences. We will continue to analyze the impact of GILTI as more guidance is issued and a decision will be made during fiscal year 2019 on whether to treat the GILTI as a period cost or a deferred tax item.
As a result of our fiscal year end, the lower U.S. statutory federal income tax rate resulted in a blended U.S. federal statutory rate of 29.3% for our fiscal year ending May 27, 2018. Itthen ended is expected to be 21% for fiscal years beginning after May 27, 2018.presented below:

Stock Appreciation Rights

 

Number

of Options

(in Millions)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value (in

Millions)

 

Outstanding at May 26, 2019

 

 

0.4

 

 

$

28.13

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(0.2

)

 

$

26.47

 

 

$

0.6

 

Expired

 

 

(0.2

)

 

$

30.76

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at May 31, 2020

 

 

0.0

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

14. PRE-TAX INCOME AND INCOME TAXES

Pre-tax income from continuing operations (including equity method investment earnings) consisted of the following:

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

United States

 

$

978.3

 

 

$

826.6

 

 

$

902.5

 

Foreign

 

 

64.8

 

 

 

72.5

 

 

 

69.6

 

 

 

$

1,043.1

 

 

$

899.1

 

 

$

972.1

 

 2018 2017 2016
United States$902.5
 $883.5
 $136.9
Foreign69.6
 (82.8) 38.0
 $972.1
 $800.7
 $174.9

The provision for income taxes included the following:

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

188.2

 

 

$

125.4

 

 

$

153.1

 

State

 

 

25.5

 

 

 

22.6

 

 

 

17.8

 

Foreign

 

 

9.5

 

 

 

21.6

 

 

 

32.5

 

 

 

 

223.2

 

 

 

169.6

 

 

 

203.4

 

Deferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

37.6

 

 

 

40.1

 

 

 

(43.7

)

State

 

 

(62.3

)

 

 

19.0

 

 

 

17.4

 

Foreign

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

(9.9

)

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

 

(21.9

)

 

 

49.2

 

 

 

(28.8

)

 

 

$

201.3

 

 

$

218.8

 

 

$

174.6

 

 2018 2017 2016
Current     
Federal$153.1
 $201.5
 $206.5
State17.8
 6.7
 31.0
Foreign32.5
 6.5
 8.6
 203.4
 214.7
 246.1
Deferred     
Federal(43.7) 62.1
 (161.5)
State17.4
 (5.3) (38.9)
Foreign(2.5) (16.8) 0.7
 (28.8) 40.0
 (199.7)
 $174.6
 $254.7
 $46.4

75


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)


Income taxes computed by applying the U.S. Federal statutory rates to income from continuing operations before income taxes are reconciled to the provision for income taxes set forth in the Consolidated Statements of OperationsEarnings as follows:

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Computed U.S. Federal income taxes

 

$

219.0

 

 

$

188.8

 

 

$

285.3

 

State income taxes, net of U.S. Federal tax impact

 

 

29.6

 

 

 

34.1

 

 

 

18.0

 

Remeasurement of deferred taxes due to U.S. tax legislation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(241.6

)

Transition tax on foreign earnings

 

 

 

 

 

(4.6

)

 

 

19.8

 

Tax credits and domestic manufacturing deduction

 

 

(9.7

)

 

 

(5.6

)

 

 

(20.6

)

Federal rate differential on legal reserve

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.6

 

Goodwill and intangible impairments

 

 

11.2

 

 

 

12.5

 

 

 

 

Remeasurement of deferred taxes due to legal entity reorganization

 

 

(40.9

)

 

 

16.9

 

 

 

 

State tax impact of combining Pinnacle business

 

 

 

 

 

(12.0

)

 

 

 

Change of valuation allowance on capital loss carryforward

 

 

 

 

 

(32.2

)

 

 

78.6

 

Other

 

 

(7.9

)

 

 

20.9

 

 

 

22.5

 

 

 

$

201.3

 

 

$

218.8

 

 

$

174.6

 

 2018 2017 2016
Computed U.S. Federal income taxes$285.3
 $280.2
 $61.2
State income taxes, net of U.S. Federal tax impact18.0
 22.4
 (6.4)
Remeasurement of U.S. deferred taxes(241.6) 
 
Transition tax on foreign earnings19.8
 
 
Tax credits and domestic manufacturing deduction(20.6) (19.8) (16.5)
Federal rate differential on legal reserve12.6
 
 
Goodwill and intangible impairments
 104.7
 
Stock compensation(5.7) (18.8) 
Change of valuation allowance on capital loss carryforward78.6
 (84.1) 
Change in estimate related to tax methods used for certain international sales, federal credits, and state credits
 (8.0) 6.0
Other28.2
 (21.9) 2.1
 $174.6
 $254.7
 $46.4

Income taxes paid, net of refunds, were $164.1$178.0 million, $213.0$133.8 million, and $291.3$164.1 million in fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:

 

 

May 31, 2020

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

Assets

 

 

Liabilities

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

$

 

 

$

258.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

240.7

 

Inventory

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.2

 

 

 

 

Goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets

 

 

 

 

 

1,108.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,187.0

 

Right-of-use assets

 

 

 

 

 

51.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

13.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.8

 

 

 

 

Compensation related liabilities

 

 

36.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

35.9

 

 

 

 

Pension and other postretirement benefits

 

 

35.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

54.6

 

 

 

 

Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

196.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

185.4

 

Lease liabilities

 

 

61.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities that will give rise to future tax deductions

 

 

88.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

123.5

 

 

 

 

Net capital and operating loss carryforwards

 

 

753.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

766.5

 

 

 

 

Federal credits

 

 

17.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

52.7

 

 

 

31.8

 

 

 

37.6

 

 

 

24.0

 

 

 

 

1,077.4

 

 

 

1,645.8

 

 

 

1,063.1

 

 

 

1,637.1

 

Less: Valuation allowance

 

 

(728.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(738.1

)

 

 

 

Net deferred taxes

 

$

349.1

 

 

$

1,645.8

 

 

$

325.0

 

 

$

1,637.1

 

 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment$
 $141.0
 $
 $216.6
Goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets
 406.2
 
 623.4
Accrued expenses15.5
 
 20.2
 
Compensation related liabilities34.1
 
 63.9
 
Pension and other postretirement benefits45.8
 
 275.2
 
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
 165.8
 
 237.8
Other liabilities that will give rise to future tax deductions109.7
 
 117.9
 
Net capital and operating loss carryforwards762.5
 
 1,112.5
 
Other26.3
 6.1
 60.0
 6.3
 993.9
 719.1
 1,649.7
 1,084.1
Less: Valuation allowance(739.6) 
 (1,013.4) 
Net deferred taxes$254.3
 $719.1
 $636.3
 $1,084.1

The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at May 27, 201831, 2020 was $32.5$35.8 million, excluding a related liability of $7.7$7.4 million for gross interest and penalties. Included in the balance at May 31, 2020 are $0.7 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility.  Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. Any associated interest and penalties imposed would affect the tax rate. As of May 28, 2017,26, 2019, our gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $39.3$44.1 million, excluding a related liability of $6.0$11.7 million for gross interest and penalties. Interest and penalties recognized in the Consolidated

76


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Statements of OperationsEarnings was ana benefit of $4.3 million and expense of $1.2 million and $1.6 million in fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, a benefit of $0.3 million in fiscal 2017, and a benefit of $0.2 million in fiscal 2016.

respectively.

The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 201726, 2019 that, if recognized, would favorably impact our effective tax rate was $27.8$30.3 million and $31.6$37.3 million, respectively.

We accrue interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We conduct business and file tax returns in numerous countries, states, and local jurisdictions. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") has completed its audit of the Company for tax years through fiscal 2015 and all2018. All resulting significant items for fiscal 20152018 and prior years have been settled with the IRS.IRS, with the exception of fiscal 2016. Statutes of limitation for pre-acquisition tax years of Pinnacle generally remain open for calendar year 2003 and subsequent years principally related to net operating losses. Other major jurisdictions where we conduct business generally have statutes of limitations ranging from three to five years.

We estimate that it is reasonably possible that the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $15.3$16.0 million over the next twelve months due to various Federal,federal, state, and foreign audit settlements and the expiration of statutes of limitations. Of this amount, approximately $6.7$6.6 million would reverse through results of discontinued operations.

The change in the unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended May 27, 201831, 2020 was:

Beginning balance on May 26, 2019

 

$

44.1

 

Increases from positions established during prior periods

 

 

2.7

 

Decreases from positions established during prior periods

 

 

(0.3

)

Increases from positions established during the current period

 

 

3.7

 

Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities

 

 

(6.4

)

Reductions resulting from lapse of applicable statute of

   limitation

 

 

(7.7

)

Other adjustments to liability

 

 

(0.3

)

Ending balance on May 31, 2020

 

$

35.8

 

Beginning balance on May 28, 2017$39.3
Increases from positions established during prior periods14.5
Decreases from positions established during prior periods(11.5)
Increases from positions established during the current period3.5
Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities(10.3)
Reductions resulting from lapse of applicable statute of limitation(2.9)
Other adjustments to liability(0.1)
Ending balance on May 27, 2018$32.5

We have approximately $27.5$27.3 million of foreign net operating loss carryforwards ($10.713.3 million will expire between fiscal 20192021 and 20392041 and $16.8$14.0 million have no expiration dates) and $19.4$126.5 million of Federal net operating loss carryforwards which expire inbetween fiscal 2037.2022 and 2027. Federal capital loss carryforwards related to the Private Brands divestiture of approximately $2.8$2.6 billion will expire in fiscal 2021. Included in net deferred tax liabilities are $35.7$42.1 million of tax effected state net operating loss carryforwards which expire in various years ranging from fiscal 20192021 to 20282039 and $173.7$165.0 million of tax effected state capital loss carryforwards related to the divestiture of Private Brands, the vast majority of which expire in fiscal 2021. Foreign tax credits of $1.0$9.7 million will expire between fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2028.2030. State tax credits of approximately $10.1$11.9 million will expire in various years ranging from fiscal 20192021 to 2028.

2029.

We have recognized a valuation allowance for the portion of the net operating loss carryforwards, capital loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and other deferred tax assets we believe are not more likely than not to be realized. The net change in the valuation allowance for fiscal 20182020 was a decrease of $273.8$9.8 million. For fiscal 20172019 and 2016,2018, changes in the valuation allowance were a decrease of $420.1$1.5 million and an increasea decrease of $1.4 billion,$273.8 million, respectively. The current year change principally relates to remeasurement of deferred tax assets and correspondingdecreases in the valuation allowances due to tax reformfor state net operating losses, charitable contributions and an adjustment tocredits.

We believe that our foreign subsidiaries have invested or will invest any undistributed earnings indefinitely, or the valuation allowance on capital loss due to the termination of the sales agreement for the Wesson® oil business.

Historically, we haveearnings will be remitted in a tax-neutral transaction, and, therefore, do not provided U.S.provide deferred taxes on the cumulative undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. During fiscal

77


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018 we determined that previously undistributed earnings

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

15. LEASES

We have operating and finance leases of certain foreign subsidiaries no longer meetwarehouses, plants, land, office space, production and distribution equipment, automobiles, and office equipment. We determine whether an agreement is or contains a lease at lease inception. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the requirementslease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease.

As most of our leases do not provide an implicit interest rate, we calculate the lease liability at lease commencement as the present value of unpaid lease payments using our estimated incremental borrowing rate. The incremental borrowing rate represents the rate of interest that we would have to pay to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments on a collateralized basis over a similar term and is determined using a portfolio approach based on information available at the commencement date of the lease.

We have elected not to separate lease and non-lease components of an agreement for indefinite reinvestment under applicable accounting guidanceall underlying asset classes prospectively from the ASC 842 adoption date.

Any lease arrangements with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We recognize lease cost for these lease arrangements on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease. We consider these options in determining the lease term used to establish our ROU asset and therefore,lease liabilities. A limited number of our lease agreements include rental payments adjusted periodically for inflation. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

Leases reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 31, 2020 were as follows:

 

 

Operating Leases

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

May 31, 2020

 

ROU assets, net

 

Other assets

 

$

209.3

 

Lease liabilities (current)

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

44.4

 

Lease liabilities (noncurrent)

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

 

206.1

 

 

 

Finance Leases

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

May 31, 2020

 

ROU assets, at cost

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

$

220.4

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(53.6

)

ROU assets, net

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

166.8

 

Lease liabilities (current)

 

Current installments of long-term debt

 

 

22.2

 

Lease liabilities (noncurrent)

 

Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments

 

 

132.9

 

The components of total lease cost for fiscal 2020 were as follows:

Operating lease cost

 

$

63.7

 

Finance lease cost

 

 

 

 

Depreciation of leased assets

 

 

15.4

 

Interest on lease liabilities

 

 

9.1

 

Short-term lease cost

 

 

3.8

 

Total lease cost

 

$

92.0

 

We recognized $5.9accelerated operating lease cost of $9.9 million and impairments of income tax expenseROU assets of $2.9 million within SG&A expenses in fiscal 2018. 2020. These charges are included in the Pinnacle Integration Restructuring Plan.

78


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The weighted-average remaining lease terms and weighted-average discount rate for our leases as of May 31, 2020 were as follows:

 

 

 

Operating Leases

 

 

Finance Leases

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

8.0

 

Weighted-average discount rate

 

 

 

3.61

%

 

 

5.29

%

Cash flows arising from lease transactions for fiscal 2020 were as follows:

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Operating cash outflows from operating leases

 

$

59.5

 

Operating cash outflows from finance leases

 

 

9.2

 

Financing cash outflows from finance leases

 

 

22.5

 

ROU assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

41.6

 

Finance leases

 

 

12.2

 

Maturities of lease liabilities by fiscal year as of May 31, 2020 were as follows:

 

Operating Leases

 

 

Finance Leases

 

 

Total

 

2021

$

53.0

 

 

$

30.3

 

 

$

83.3

 

2022

 

42.1

 

 

 

27.7

 

 

 

69.8

 

2023

 

36.5

 

 

 

23.7

 

 

 

60.2

 

2024

 

28.0

 

 

 

19.7

 

 

 

47.7

 

2025

 

19.7

 

 

 

17.8

 

 

 

37.5

 

Later years

 

118.6

 

 

 

75.5

 

 

 

194.1

 

Total lease payments

 

297.9

 

 

 

194.7

 

 

 

492.6

 

Less: Imputed interest

 

(47.4

)

 

 

(39.6

)

 

 

(87.0

)

Total lease liabilities

$

250.5

 

 

$

155.1

 

 

$

405.6

 

We continue to believe the remaining undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are indefinitely reinvestedhave entered into lease agreements for certain facilities and thereforeequipment with payments totaling $2.0 million that have not provided any additional U.S. deferred taxes. Ityet commenced as of May 31, 2020.

A summary of non-cancelable operating lease commitments as of May 26, 2019 is not practicable to estimate the amount of U.S. income taxes that would be incurred in the event that we were to repatriate all the cumulative earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies. Accordingly, deferred taxes will be provided for earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies when we determine that such earnings are no longer indefinitely reinvested.as follows:

2020

 

$

52.1

 

2021

 

 

48.4

 

2022

 

 

38.0

 

2023

 

 

34.1

 

2024

 

 

25.6

 

Later years

 

 

114.4

 

 

 

$

312.6

 


16. LEASES
We lease certain facilities, land, and transportation equipment under agreements that expire at various dates.

Rent expense under all operating leases from continuing operations was $83.5 million and $62.5 million $71.2 million,fiscal 2019 and $77.4 million in fiscal 2018,, 2017, and 2016, respectively. These amounts are inclusive of certain charges recognized at the cease-use date for remaining lease payments associated with exited properties.



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

A summary of non-cancellable operating lease commitments for fiscal years following May 27, 2018, was as follows:
2019$35.6
202025.2
202122.3
202217.9
202315.8
Later years82.3
 $199.1

At May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, assets under capital and financing leases totaling $82.9 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $32.1 million, and $119.5 million, net of $47.7 million of accumulated depreciation, respectively, were included in Property, plant and equipment. Charges resulting from the depreciation of assets held under capital and financing leases are recognized within depreciation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Non-cash issuances of capital and financing lease obligations totaling $1.3 million, $0.5$23.5 million and $103.3$1.3 million are excluded from cash flows from investing and financing activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for fiscal 2019 and 2018, 2017,respectively.

79


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and 2016, respectively.


17.May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

16. CONTINGENCIES

Litigation Matters

We are a party to certain litigation matters relating to our acquisition of Beatrice Company ("Beatrice") in fiscal 1991, including litigation proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to our acquisition of the company. These proceedings includehave included suits against a number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("ConAgra Grocery Products") as alleged successor to W. P. Fuller & Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by a predecessor to Beatrice from 1962 until 1967. These lawsuits generally seek damages for personal injury, property damage, economic loss, and governmental expenditures allegedly caused by the use of lead-based paint, and/or injunctive relief for inspection and abatement. Although decisions favorable to usWhen such lawsuits have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California.brought, ConAgra Grocery Products has denied liability, in both suits, both on the merits of the claims and on the basis that we do not believe it to be the successor to any liability attributable to W. P. Fuller & Co. TheDecisions favorable to us were rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio. ConAgra Grocery Products was held liable for the abatement of a public nuisance in California, suit isand the case was dismissed pursuant to settlement in July 2019 as discussed in the following paragraph. We remain a defendant in one active suit in Illinois. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief for reimbursement of costs associated with the testing of lead levels in blood. We do not believe it is probable that we have incurred any liability with respect to the Illinois case, nor is it possible to estimate any potential exposure.

In California, a number of cities and counties joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of an alleged public nuisance in the form of lead-based paint potentially present on the interior of residences, regardless of its condition. On September 23, 2013, a trial of the California case concluded in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara, and on January 27, 2014, the court entered a judgment (the "Judgment") against ConAgra Grocery Products and two2 other defendants ordering the creation of a California abatement fund in the amount of $1.15 billion. Liability iswas joint and several. The Company appealed the Judgment, and on November 14, 2017 the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District reversed in part, holding that the defendants were not liable to pay for abatement of homes built after 1950, but affirmed the Judgment as to homes built before 1951. The Court of Appeal remanded the case to the trial court with directions to recalculate the amount of the abatement fund estimated to be necessary to cover the cost of remediating pre-1951 homes, and to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding appointment of a suitable receiver. ConAgra Grocery Products and the other defendants petitioned the California Supreme Court for review of the decision, which we believe to be an unprecedented expansion of current California law. On February 14, 2018, the California Supreme Court denied the petition and declined to review the merits of the case, and the case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. ConAgra Grocery Products and the other defendants have indicated that they will seeksought further review of certain issues from the Supreme Court of the United States, although further appeal is discretionary and may not be granted. Further proceedings inbut on October 15, 2018, the Supreme Court declined to review the case. On September 4, 2018, the trial court may not be stayed pending the outcome of any further appeal. In light of the decision rendered by the California Appellate Court on November 14, 2017, and the California Supreme Court's decision on February 14, 2018 not to review the Appellate Court's decision, we


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

have concluded that the liability has likely become probable as contemplated by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 450, however many uncertainties remain which make it difficult to estimate the potential liability, including the following: (i) the trial court has not yet recalculated its estimate of the amount needed to remediate pre-1951 homes in the plaintiff jurisdictions or entered a new judgment to replacebe $409.0 million. As of July 10, 2019, the one vacated by the California Appellate Court; (ii) although liability is joint and several, it is unknown what amount each defendant may ultimately be requiredparties reached an agreement in principle to pay or how allocation among the defendants (and other potentially responsible parties such as property owners who may have violated the applicable housing codes) will be determined; (iii) according to the trial court's original order, participation in the abatement program by eligible homeowners is voluntary and it is unknown what percentage of eligible homeowners will choose to participate or how such claims will be administered; (iv) the trial court's original order required that any amounts paid by the defendants into the fund that were not spent within four years would be returned to the defendants, and it is unknown whetherresolve this feature of the fund will be retained or, if it is retained, how much will be spent during that time period; and (v) defendants will have a new right to appeal any new aspects of the judgment enteredmatter, which agreement was approved by the trial court upon remand, although it is unknown whetheron July 24, 2019, and the court would stay execution of any new judgment while a subsequent appeal is pending.

To assist the trial court in satisfying its responsibilities, during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the defendants and plaintiff each submitted informationaction against ConAgra Grocery Products was dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to the court regarding recalculationsettlement, ConAgra Grocery Products will pay a total of $101.7 million in 7 installments to be paid annually from fiscal 2020 through fiscal 2026. As part of the abatement fund. In addition, onesettlement, ConAgra Grocery Products has provided a guarantee of up to $15.0 million in the defendants entered into a proposed settlement with the plaintiff, contingent upon a judicial good faith determination under California law. event co-defendant, NL Industries, Inc., defaults on its payment obligations.

We are uncertain as to when the court will make a ruling on a recalculated abatement fund or the proposed settlement. Notwithstanding the uncertainties described above, this additional information was used by the Company in concluding that a loss is now reasonably estimable. While the ultimate amount of any loss and timing of payments related thereto remain uncertain and could change as further information is obtained, we believe that our share of the loss could range from $60 million to $335have accrued $11.5 million and have recorded a liability$63.1 million, within other accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities, respectively, for the amount in that range that we believe is a better estimate than the low or high endsthis matter as of the range.May 31, 2020. The extent of insurance coverage is uncertain and the Company's carriers are on notice; however, any possible insurance recovery has not been considered for purposes of determining our liability. We cannot assure that the final resolution of thesethe lead paint and pigment matters will not have a material adverse effect on itsour financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim® branded meat snacks. In June 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release and not a deliberate act. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we settled our property and business interruption claims related to the Garner accident with our insurance providers. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ("Jacobs"), our engineer and project manager at the site, filed a declaratory judgment action against us seeking indemnity for personal injury claims brought against it as a result of the accident. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our motion for summary judgment was granted and the suit was dismissed without prejudice on the basis that the suit was filed prematurely. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, Jacobs refiled its action seeking indemnity. On March 25, 2016, a Douglas County jury in Nebraska rendered a verdict in favor of Jacobs and against us in the amount of $108.9 million plus post-judgment interest. We filed our Notice of Appeal in September 2016, the appeal was heard by the Nebraska Supreme Court in November 2017, and the case is awaiting decision by the Nebraska Supreme Court. The appeal will be decided directly by the Nebraska Supreme Court. Although our insurance carriers have provided customary notices of reservation of their rights under the policies of insurance, we expect any ultimate exposure in this case to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible.

We are party to a number of putative class action lawsuits challenging various product claims made in the Company's product labeling. These matters include Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., in which it is alleged that the labeling for Wesson® oils as 100% natural is false and misleading because the oils contain genetically modified plants and organisms. In February 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted class certification to permit plaintiffs to pursue state law claims. The Company appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed class certification in January 2017. The Supreme Court of the United States declined to review the decision and the case has beenwas remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. While we cannot predict with certaintyOn April 4, 2019, the resultstrial court granted preliminary approval of a settlement in this or any other legal proceeding, we domatter. In the second quarter of fiscal 2020, a single objecting class member appealed the court's decision approving the settlement to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The settlement will not expect this matterbe final until the appeal has been resolved.

80


Notes to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.

Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We are party to matters challenging the Company's wage and hour practices. These matters include a number of putative class actions consolidated under the caption Negrete v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., et al, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, in which the plaintiffs allege a pattern of violations of California and/or federal law at several current and former Company manufacturing facilities across the State of California. While we cannot predict with certainty


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

the results of this or any other legal proceeding, we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.
In

We are party to a number of matters asserting product liability claims against the fourthCompany related to certain Pam® and other cooking spray products. These lawsuits generally seek damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by defects in the design, manufacture, or safety warnings of the cooking spray products. We have put the Company's insurance carriers on notice. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of these or any other legal proceedings, we do not expect these matters to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.

The Company, its directors, and several of its executive officers are defendants in several class actions alleging violations of federal securities laws. The lawsuits assert that the Company's officers made material misstatements and omissions that caused the market to have an unrealistically positive assessment of the Company's financial prospects in light of the acquisition of Pinnacle, thus causing the Company's securities to be overvalued prior to the release of the Company's consolidated financial results on December 20, 2018 for the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we accrued $151.0 millionyear 2019. The first of these lawsuits, captioned West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. Conagra Brands, Inc., et al., with which subsequent lawsuits alleging similar facts have been consolidated, was filed on February 22, 2019 in new legal reserves relatingthe U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In addition, on May 9, 2019, a shareholder filed a derivative action on behalf of the Company against the Company's directors captioned Klein v. Arora, et al. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois asserting harm to the Company due to alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and mismanagement in connection with the Pinnacle acquisition. On July 9, 2019, September 20, 2019, and March 10, 2020, the Company received three separate demands from stockholders under Delaware law to inspect the Company's books and records related to the Board of Directors' review of the Pinnacle business, acquisition, and the Company's public statements related to them. On July 22, 2019 and August 6, 2019, respectively, two additional shareholder derivative lawsuits captioned Opperman v. Connolly, et al. and Dahl v. Connolly, et al. were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois asserting similar facts and claims as the Klein v. Arora, et al. matter. On October 21, 2019, the Company received an additional demand from a stockholder under Delaware law to appoint a special committee to investigate the conduct of certain officers and directors in connection with the Pinnacle acquisition and the Company's public statements. We have put the Company's insurance carriers on notice of each of these securities and shareholder matters. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of these or any other legal proceedings, we do not expect these matters set forth above.

to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.

Environmental Matters

We are a party to certain environmental proceedings relating to our acquisition of Beatrice in fiscal 1991. Such proceedings include proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to our acquisition of Beatrice. The current environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's possible status as a potentially responsible party at approximately 40 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites (the "Beatrice sites"). These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs,polycholorinated biphenyls, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. In the past five years, Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 31 of these sites. Reserves for these Beatrice environmental proceedings have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The accrual for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled $52.4$57.7 million as of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, a final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study was submitted for the Southwest Properties portion ("Operating Unit 4") of the Wells G&H Superfund site, which is one of the Beatrice sites. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"("EPA") issued a Record of Decision (the "ROD"("ROD") for the Southwest Properties portion of the site on September 29, 2017 and has entered into negotiations with potentially responsible parties to determine final responsibility for implementing the ROD.

Additionally, in conjunction with the conclusion of the fifth Five-Year Review period for Operating Unit 1 of the Wells G&H site, which spanned from October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2019, we are negotiating with the EPA to allow us to begin testing different environmental remediation methods to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our current cleanup efforts affecting both Operating Units 1 and 2. As a result, in

81


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

the second quarter of fiscal 2020, we increased our environmental reserves by $6.6 million associated with these expected cleanup efforts.

Guarantees and Other Contingencies

In certain limited situations, we

We guarantee obligationsan obligation of the Lamb Weston business pursuant to a guarantee arrangementsarrangement that existed prior to the Spinoff andspinoff of the Lamb Weston business (the "Spinoff"). The guarantee remained in place following completion of the Spinoff and it will remain in place until such guarantee obligations areobligation is substituted for guarantees issued by Lamb Weston. Such guarantee arrangements are described below. Pursuant to the Separationseparation and Distribution Agreement,distribution agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016 (the "Separation Agreement"), between us and Lamb Weston, thesethis guarantee arrangements arearrangement is deemed liabilitiesa liability of Lamb Weston that werewas transferred to Lamb Weston as part of the Spinoff. Accordingly, in the event that we are required to make any payments as a result of thesethis guarantee arrangements,arrangement, Lamb Weston is obligated to indemnify us for any such liability, reduced by any insurance proceeds received by us, in accordance with the terms of the indemnification provisions under the Separation Agreement.

Lamb Weston is a party to a warehouse services agreement with a third-party warehouse provider through July 2035. Under this agreement, Lamb Weston is required to make payments for warehouse services based on the quantity of goods stored and other service factors. We have guaranteed the warehouse provider that we will make the payments required under the agreement in the event that Lamb Weston fails to perform. Minimum payments of $1.5 million per month are required under this agreement. It is not possible to determine the maximum amount of the payment obligations under this agreement. Upon completion of the Spinoff, we recognized a liability for the estimated fair value of this guarantee. As of May 27, 2018, the amount of this guarantee, recorded in other noncurrent liabilities, was $28.1 million.
Lamb Weston is a party to an agricultural sublease agreement with a third party for certain farmland through 2020 (subject, at Lamb Weston's option, to extension for two2 additional five-year periods). Under the terms of the sublease agreement, Lamb Weston is required to make certain rental payments to the sublessor. We have guaranteed the sublessor Lamb Weston's performance and the payment of all amounts (including indemnification obligations) owed by Lamb Weston under the sublease agreement, up to a maximum of $75.0 million. We believe the farmland associated with this sublease agreement is readily marketable for lease to other area farming operators. As such, we believe that any financial exposure to the company,Company, in the event that we were required to perform under the guaranty,guarantee, would be largely mitigated.

We lease or leased certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased. The lease agreements also contain contingent put options (the "lease put options") that allow or allowed the lessors to require us to purchase the buildings at the greater of original construction cost, or fair market value, without a lease agreement in place (the "put price") in certain limited circumstances. As a result of substantial impairment charges related to our divested Private Brands operations, these lease put options became exercisable. During fiscal 2016, we entered into a series of related transactions in which we exchanged


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

a warehouse we owned in Indiana for two buildings and parcels of land that we leased as part of our Omaha corporate offices. Concurrent with the asset exchange, the leases on the two Omaha corporate buildings subject to contingent put options were canceled. We recognized aggregate charges of $55.6 million for the early termination of these leases. We also entered into a lease for the warehouse in Indiana and we recorded a financing lease obligation of $74.2 million. During fiscal 2017, one of these lease agreements expired. As a result of this expiration, we reversed the applicable accrual and recognized a benefit of $6.7 million in SG&A expenses. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we purchased two buildings that were subject to lease put options and recognized net losses totaling $48.2 million for the early exit of unfavorable lease contracts. As of May 27, 2018, there was one remaining leased building subject to a lease put option for which the put option price exceeded the estimated fair value of the property by $8.2 million, of which we had accrued $1.2 million. We are amortizing the difference between the put price and the estimated fair value (without a lease agreement in place) of the property over the remaining lease term within SG&A expenses. ThisDuring fiscal 2018, we purchased 2 buildings that were subject to lease put options and recognized net losses totaling $48.2 million for the early exit of unfavorable lease contracts.

As of May 31, 2020, there was one remaining leased building subject to a lease put option. The lease is accounted for as an operating lease and accordingly, there are no material assets and liabilities, other than$8.2 million, representing the accrued portionvalue for which the put option price exceeded the estimated fair value of the put price, associated with this entityproperty, was included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this entity. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the termsour measurement of the lease agreement,liability upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases, Topic 842, in the expected remaining useful lifefirst quarter of fiscal 2020.

In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. We guarantee certain leases resulting from the divestiture of the asset leased,JM Swank business completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. As of May 31, 2020, the remaining terms of these arrangements did not exceed three years and the capital structuremaximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $0.6 million. In addition, we guarantee a lease resulting from an exited facility. As of May 31, 2020, the lessor entity.

remaining term of this arrangement did not exceed seven years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $16.5 million.

General

After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity; however, it is reasonably possible that a change of the estimates of any of the foregoing matters may occur in the future and, as noted, the lead paint matter could result in a material final judgment which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

Costs of legal services associated with the foregoing matters are recognized in earnings as services are provided.


18.

82


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

17. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Our operations are exposed to market risks from adverse changes in commodity prices affecting the cost of raw materials and energy, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates. In the normal course of business, these risks are managed through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivatives.

Commodity and commodity index futures and option contracts are used from time to time to economically hedge commodity input prices on items such as natural gas, vegetable oils, proteins, packaging materials, dairy, grains, and electricity. Generally, we economically hedge a portion of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs for periods of up to 36 months. We may enter into longer-term economic hedges on particular commodities, if deemed appropriate. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we had economically hedged certain portions of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs using derivative instruments with expiration dates through March 2019.

April 2021.

In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we enter into forward exchange, option, or swap contracts from time to time for transactions denominated in a currency other than the applicable functional currency. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign-denominated assets and liabilities. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we had economically hedged certain portions of our foreign currency risk in anticipated transactions using derivative instruments with expiration dates through February 2019.

2021.

From time to time, we may use derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, to reduce risk related to changes in interest rates. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against increasing interest rates prior to the issuance of long-term debt and hedging the fair value of our senior long-term debt.


Notes

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

During the first quarter of fiscal 2019, we entered into deal-contingent forward starting interest rate swap contracts to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Endedhedge a portion of the interest rate risk related to our issuance of long-term debt to help finance the acquisition of Pinnacle. We settled these contracts during the second quarter of fiscal 2019 and deferred a $47.5 million gain in accumulated other comprehensive income. This gain will be amortized as a reduction of net interest expense over the lives of the related debt instruments. The unamortized amount at May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

31, 2020 was $42.0 million.

Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows

Many of our derivatives do not qualify for, and we do not currently designate certain commodity or foreign currency derivatives to achieve, hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption and to mitigate foreign currency cash flow risk in earnings immediately within general corporate expense (within cost of goods sold). The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold. In the event that management determines a particular derivative entered into as an economic hedge of a forecasted commodity purchase has ceased to function as an economic hedge, we cease recognizing further gains and losses on such derivatives in corporate expense and begin recognizing such gains and losses within segment operating results immediately.

Economic Hedges of Fair Values — Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We may use options and cross currency swaps to economically hedge the fair value of certain monetary assets and liabilities (including intercompany balances) denominated in a currency other than the functional currency. These derivatives are marked-to-market with gains and losses immediately recognized in SG&A expenses. These substantially offset the foreign currency transaction gains or losses recognized as values of the monetary assets or liabilities being economically hedged.

hedged change.

All derivative instruments are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value (refer to Note 2019 for additional information related to fair value measurements). The fair value of derivative assets is recognized within prepaid expenses and other current assets, while the fair value of derivative liabilities is recognized within other accrued liabilities. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,U.S. GAAP, we offset certain derivative asset and liability balances, as well as certain amounts representing rights to reclaim cash

83


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

collateral and obligations to return cash collateral, where master netting agreements provide for legal right of setoff. At May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 2017, $1.026, 2019, $1.1 million, representing a right to reclaim cash collateral, and $0.1 million, representing an obligation to return cash collateral, and $0.9 million, representing a right to reclaim cash collateral, respectively, were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Derivative assets and liabilities and amounts representing a right to reclaim cash collateral or obligation to return cash collateral were reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:

 

 

May 31, 2020

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

$

8.0

 

 

$

5.9

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

1.4

 

 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Prepaid expenses and other current assets$4.4
 $2.3
Other accrued liabilities0.1
 1.3

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities at May 27, 2018,31, 2020, on a gross basis, prior to the setoff of $1.4$0.4 million to total derivative assets and $1.5 million to total derivative liabilities where legal right of setoff existed:

 

 

Derivative Assets

 

 

Derivative Liabilities

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

Fair Value

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

Fair Value

 

Commodity contracts

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

$

3.3

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

$

1.9

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

5.1

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

0.0

 

Total derivatives not designated as

   hedging instruments

 

 

 

$

8.4

 

 

 

 

$

1.9

 

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, at May 26, 2019, on a gross basis, prior to the setoff of $0.5 million to total derivative assets and $0.4 million to total derivative liabilities where legal right of setoff existed:

 

 

Derivative Assets

 

 

Derivative Liabilities

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

Fair Value

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

Fair Value

 

Commodity contracts

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

$

4.9

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

$

0.9

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

1.4

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

0.9

 

Other

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

0.1

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as

   hedging instruments

 

 

 

$

6.4

 

 

 

 

$

1.8

 

 Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value
Commodity contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets $3.7
 Other accrued liabilities $0.4
Foreign exchange contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets 2.1
 Other accrued liabilities 
OtherPrepaid expenses and other current assets 
 Other accrued liabilities 0.1
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments  $5.8
   $0.5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, at May 28, 2017, on a gross basis, prior to the setoff of $0.5 million to total derivative assets and $1.4 million to total derivative liabilities where legal right of setoff existed:
 Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value
Commodity contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets $2.6
 Other accrued liabilities $1.4
Foreign exchange contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets 0.2
 Other accrued liabilities 1.1
OtherPrepaid expenses and other current assets 
 Other accrued liabilities 0.2
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments  $2.8
   $2.7

The location and amount of gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in our Consolidated Statements of OperationsEarnings were as follows:

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2020

 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

 

Location in Consolidated

Statement of Earnings of Gains (Losses)

Recognized on Derivatives

 

Amount of Gains (Losses)

Recognized on Derivatives

in Consolidated Statement

of Earnings

 

Commodity contracts

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

(18.4

)

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

5.5

 

Total losses from derivative instruments not

   designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

$

(12.9

)

  For the Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2018
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 
Location in Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Consolidated
Statement of Operations
Commodity contracts Cost of goods sold $3.0
Foreign exchange contracts Cost of goods sold (3.9)
Foreign exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expense 0.3
Total loss from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments   $(0.6)
  For the Fiscal Year Ended May 28, 2017
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 
Location in Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Consolidated
Statement of Operations
Commodity contracts Cost of goods sold $0.9
Foreign exchange contracts Cost of goods sold (0.3)
Foreign exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expense 0.2
Total gain from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments   $0.8

84


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended May 26, 2019

 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

 

Location in Consolidated

Statement of Earnings of Gains (Losses)

Recognized on Derivatives

 

Amount of Gains (Losses)

Recognized on Derivatives

in Consolidated Statement

of Earnings

 

Commodity contracts

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

(5.3

)

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

1.7

 

Total losses from derivative instruments not

   designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

$

(3.6

)

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2018

 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

 

Location in Consolidated

Statement of Earnings of Gains (Losses)

Recognized on Derivatives

 

Amount of Gains

(Losses) Recognized

on Derivatives

in Consolidated

Statement

of Earnings

 

Commodity contracts

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

3.0

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

(3.9

)

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

0.3

 

Total losses from derivative instruments not

   designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

$

(0.6

)


  
For the Fiscal Year Ended May 29, 2016

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 
Location in Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Consolidated
Statement of Operations
Commodity contracts Cost of goods sold $(8.1)
Foreign exchange contracts Cost of goods sold 0.7
Foreign exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expense 2.9
Total loss from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments   $(4.5)

As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, our open commodity contracts had a notional value (defined as notional quantity times market value per notional quantity unit) of $100.0$102.0 million and $34.2$3.4 million for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. As of May 28, 2017,26, 2019, our open commodity contracts had a notional value of $76.8$140.1 million and $73.4$18.5 million for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. The notional amount of our foreign currency forward and cross currency swap contracts as of May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 201726, 2019 was $82.4$107.6 million and $81.9$88.2 million,, respectively.

We enter into certain commodity, interest rate, and foreign exchange derivatives with a diversified group of counterparties. We continually monitor our positions and the credit ratings of the counterparties involved and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party. These transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties. We have not incurred a material loss due to nonperformance in any period presented and do not expect to incur any such material loss. We also enter into futures and options transactions through various regulated exchanges.

At May 27, 2018,31, 2020, the maximum amount of loss due to the credit risk of the counterparties, had the counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contracts, was $2.7$5.2 million.


19.

18. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

We have defined benefit retirement plans ("plans") for eligible salaried and hourly employees. Benefits are based on years of credited service and average compensation or stated amounts for each year of service. We also sponsor postretirement plans which provide certain medical and dental benefits ("other postretirement benefits") to qualifying U.S. employees. Effective August 1, 2013, our defined benefit pension plan for eligible salaried employees was closed to new hire salaried employees. New hire salaried employees will generally be eligible to participate in our defined contribution plan.

In connection with the acquisition of Pinnacle, we now include the components of pension and postretirement expense associated with the Pinnacle pension plans and a post-employment benefit plan in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings from the date of the completion of the acquisition. These plans are frozen for future benefits. The tabular disclosures presented below are inclusive of the Pinnacle plans.

85


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, we amended a certain hourly pension plan that will freeze future compensation and service periods. As a result, we remeasured the Company’s hourly pension plan liability as of January 31, 2020 and recorded a pension curtailment loss of $0.2 million previously within other comprehensive income (loss). In connection with the remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate assumption for the impacted pension plan from 3.86% to 2.96%. The remeasurement increased the underfunded status of the pension plan by $4.3 million with a corresponding loss within other comprehensive income (loss).

During the second quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company provided a voluntary lump-sum settlement offer to certain terminated vested participants in the salaried pension plan in order to reduce a portion of the pension obligation. During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, lump-sum settlement payments totaling $154.6 million were distributed from pension plan assets to such participants. As a result of the settlement, we were required to remeasure our pension plan liability. In connection with the remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate assumption for the impacted pension plan obligation from 3.89% to 3.37%, as of December 31, 2019. The settlement and related remeasurement resulted in the recognition of a settlement gain of $2.1 million, reflected in pension and postretirement non-service income, as well as a benefit to other comprehensive income (loss) totaling $79.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2020.

As a result of the anticipated exit of certain facilities, during the first quarter of fiscal 2020, we remeasured the Company's hourly pension plan as of August 25, 2019 and recorded a pension curtailment loss of $0.6 million previously within other comprehensive income (loss). In connection with the remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate assumption for the impacted pension plan obligation from 3.90% to 3.13%. The curtailment loss and related remeasurement increased the underfunded status of the pension plan by $12.3 million with a corresponding loss within other comprehensive income (loss).

During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we approved the amendment of our salaried and non-qualified pension plans effective as of December 31, 2017. The amendment froze the compensation and service periods used to calculate pension benefits for active employees who participate in the plans. Beginning January 1, 2018, impacted employees do not accrue additional benefit for future service and eligible compensation received under these plans.

As a result of thethis amendment, we remeasured our pension plan liability as of September 30, 2017. In connection with the remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate assumption from 3.90% to 3.78%. The curtailment and related remeasurement resulted in a net decrease to the underfunded status of the pension plans by $43.5 million with a corresponding benefit within other comprehensive income (loss) for the second quarter of fiscal 2018. In addition, we recorded charges of $3.4 million and $0.7 million reflecting the write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability and a curtailment charge, respectively.

We recognize the funded status of our plans and other benefits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For our plans, we also recognize as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss,income (loss), the net of tax results of the actuarial gains or losses within the corridor and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost. For our other benefits, we also recognize as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), the net of tax results of the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost. These amounts will be adjusted out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as they are subsequently recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. For our pension plans, we have elected to immediately recognize


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

actuarial gains and losses in our operating results in the year in which they occur, to the extent they exceed the corridor, eliminating amortization. Amounts are included in the components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs, below, as recognized net actuarial loss.
The information below includes the activities of our continuing

86


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and discontinued operations.

May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The changes in benefit obligations and plan assets at May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 201726, 2019 are presented in the following table.

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Change in Benefit Obligation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

3,733.2

 

 

$

3,423.6

 

 

$

91.2

 

 

$

119.3

 

Service cost

 

 

11.5

 

 

 

10.9

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Interest cost

 

 

118.4

 

 

 

132.6

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

3.8

 

Plan participants' contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5

 

Amendments

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.8

)

Actuarial loss (gain)

 

 

411.6

 

 

 

150.1

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

(24.3

)

Plan settlements

 

 

(201.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Curtailments

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.6

)

Benefits paid

 

 

(199.3

)

 

 

(191.2

)

 

 

(6.9

)

 

 

(9.8

)

Currency

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.2

)

Business acquisitions and divestitures

 

 

 

 

 

206.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.7

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

3,872.5

 

 

$

3,733.2

 

 

$

89.8

 

 

$

91.2

 

Change in Plan Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 

$

3,601.5

 

 

$

3,355.1

 

 

$

3.4

 

 

$

3.7

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

557.5

 

 

 

252.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

Employer contributions

 

 

17.5

 

 

 

14.7

 

 

 

6.9

 

 

 

7.3

 

Plan participants' contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5

 

Plan settlements

 

 

(156.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Benefits paid

 

 

(199.3

)

 

 

(191.2

)

 

 

(6.9

)

 

 

(9.8

)

Currency

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Business acquisitions and divestitures

 

 

 

 

 

171.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 

$

3,820.4

 

 

$

3,601.5

 

 

$

3.4

 

 

$

3.4

 

 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 2018 2017 2018 2017
Change in Benefit Obligation       
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$3,548.7
 $3,903.0
 $156.9
 $201.7
Service cost42.8
 56.9
 0.2
 0.3
Interest cost111.1
 116.8
 3.9
 4.6
Plan participants' contributions
 
 4.7
 4.7
Amendments0.6
 5.5
 (17.2) 
Actuarial gain(9.4) (51.5) (13.2) (32.0)
Plan settlements(10.2) (287.5) 
 
Special termination benefits
 1.5
 
 
Curtailments(79.5) (18.1) 
 
Benefits paid(181.3) (169.7) (16.2) (19.0)
Currency0.8
 (0.8) 0.2
 (0.2)
Business divestitures
 (7.4) 
 (3.2)
Benefit obligation at end of year$3,423.6
 $3,548.7
 $119.3
 $156.9
Change in Plan Assets       
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$2,983.6
 $2,959.4
 $
 $0.1
Actual return on plan assets276.1
 346.1
 3.7
 
Employer contributions312.6
 163.0
 11.5
 14.2
Plan participants' contributions
 
 4.7
 4.7
Plan settlements(10.2) (287.5) 
 
Investment and administrative expenses(26.5) (26.7) 
 
Benefits paid(181.3) (169.7) (16.2) (19.0)
Currency0.8
 (1.0) 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$3,355.1
 $2,983.6
 $3.7
 $

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The funded status and amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 201726, 2019 were:

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Funded Status

 

$

(52.1

)

 

$

(131.7

)

 

$

(86.4

)

 

$

(87.8

)

Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

$

202.4

 

 

$

61.2

 

 

$

2.9

 

 

$

2.8

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

(8.9

)

 

 

(10.2

)

 

 

(10.0

)

 

 

(10.8

)

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

 

(245.6

)

 

 

(182.7

)

 

 

(79.3

)

 

 

(79.8

)

Net Amount Recognized

 

$

(52.1

)

 

$

(131.7

)

 

$

(86.4

)

 

$

(87.8

)

Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other

   Comprehensive (Income) Loss (Pre-tax)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial net loss (gain)

 

$

51.2

 

 

$

115.8

 

 

$

(15.0

)

 

$

(47.8

)

Net prior service cost (benefit)

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

12.1

 

 

 

(40.1

)

 

 

(17.1

)

Total

 

$

59.8

 

 

$

127.9

 

 

$

(55.1

)

 

$

(64.9

)

Weighted-Average Actuarial Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations at May 31, 2020 and May 26, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

 

2.98

%

 

 

3.88

%

 

 

2.39

%

 

 

3.48

%

Long-term rate of compensation increase

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

  Pension Benefits Other Benefits
  2018 2017 2018 2017
Funded Status $(68.5) $(565.1) $(115.6) $(156.9)
Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets        
Other assets $103.0
 $17.1
 $2.6
 $
Other accrued liabilities (11.8) (10.9) (16.2) (18.4)
Other noncurrent liabilities (159.7) (571.3) (102.0) (138.5)
Net Amount Recognized $(68.5) $(565.1) $(115.6) $(156.9)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss (Pre-tax)        
Actuarial net loss (gain) $48.8
 $174.2
 $(25.8) $(9.0)
Net prior service cost (benefit) 13.8
 16.0
 (18.4) (4.6)
Total $62.6
 $190.2
 $(44.2) $(13.6)
Weighted-Average Actuarial Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations at May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017        
Discount rate 4.14% 3.90% 3.81% 3.33%
Long-term rate of compensation increase N/A
 3.63% N/A
 N/A

87


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $3.4$3.87 billion and $3.5$3.73 billion at May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 2017,26, 2019, respectively.

The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 201726, 2019 were:

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Projected benefit obligation

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,062.8

 

 

$

964.3

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,062.8

 

 

 

963.7

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

808.2

 

 

 

771.4

 

  2018 2017
Projected benefit obligation $951.1
 $3,433.6
Accumulated benefit obligation 950.1
 3,357.1
Fair value of plan assets 779.5
 2,851.4

Components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs included:

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Service cost

 

$

11.5

 

 

$

10.9

 

 

$

42.8

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

0.2

 

Interest cost

 

 

118.4

 

 

 

132.6

 

 

 

111.1

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

3.9

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(170.2

)

 

 

(174.4

)

 

 

(218.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

(3.4

)

Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)

 

 

44.8

 

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

(4.6

)

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

 

Settlement loss (gain)

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

 

Curtailment loss (gain)

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

 

Benefit cost — Company plans

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

(22.7

)

 

 

(56.1

)

 

 

(4.2

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

0.7

 

Pension benefit cost — multi-employer plans

 

 

6.5

 

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total benefit (income) cost

 

$

12.4

 

 

$

(16.4

)

 

$

(49.0

)

 

$

(4.2

)

 

$

(1.3

)

 

$

0.7

 

 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Service cost$42.8
 $56.9
 $93.8
 $0.2
 $0.3
 $0.4
Interest cost111.1
 116.8
 159.8
 3.9
 4.6
 7.5
Expected return on plan assets(218.3) (207.4) (259.9) 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)2.9
 2.6
 2.7
 (3.4) (6.6) (7.8)
Special termination benefits
 1.5
 25.6
 
 
 
Recognized net actuarial loss3.4
 1.2
 348.5
 
 0.5
 0.1
Settlement loss1.3
 13.8
 
 
 
 
Curtailment loss0.7
 1.7
 0.3
 
 
 
Benefit cost — Company plans(56.1) (12.9) 370.8
 0.7
 (1.2) 0.2
Pension benefit cost — multi-employer plans7.1
 12.0
 42.9
 
 
 
Total benefit (income) cost$(49.0) $(0.9) $413.7
 $0.7
 $(1.2) $0.2

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

As a result of the Spinoff, during fiscal 2017, we recorded a pension curtailment gain of $19.5 million within other comprehensive income (loss) and remeasured a significant qualified pension plan as of November 9, 2016. In connection with the remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate assumption from 3.86% to 4.04%. The remeasurement and the curtailment gain decreased the underfunded status of the pension plans by $66.0 million with a corresponding benefit within other comprehensive income (loss).
During fiscal 2017, we provided a voluntary lump-sum settlement offer to certain terminated vested participants in our salaried pension plan. Lump-sum settlement payments totaling $287.5 million were distributed from pension plan assets to such participants. Due to the pension settlement, we were required to remeasure our pension plan liability. In connection with the remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate assumption to 4.11%, as of December 31, 2016. The settlement and related remeasurement resulted in the recognition of a settlement charge of 13.8 million, reflected in SG&A expenses, as well as a benefit to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) totaling $62.2 million.
Special termination benefits granted in connection with the voluntary retirement program resulted in the recognition of $25.6 million of expense during fiscal 2016. This expense was included in restructuring activities.

In fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, the Company recorded charges of $3.4$44.8 million, $1.2$5.1 million, and $348.5$3.4 million, respectively, reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability.

In fiscal 2020, the higher actuarial losses outside of the 10% corridor is principally related to a reduction in the discount rate used to recognize at present value our pension obligations and a decline in market value of certain plan assets associated with our non-qualified and hourly plans.

The Company recorded an expense of $0.3 million and $0.6 million (primarily within restructuring activities), $4.0 million ($2.1 million was recorded in discontinued operations and $1.9 million was recorded in restructuring activities), and $31.8 million ($2.0 million was recorded in discontinued operations and $29.8 million was recorded in restructuring activities) during fiscal 2018, 2017,2019 and 2016,2018, respectively, related to our expected incurrence of certain multi-employer plan withdrawal costs.

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) were:

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Net actuarial gain (loss)

 

$

21.9

 

 

$

(72.1

)

 

$

(2.9

)

 

$

25.1

 

Amendments

 

 

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

(2.2

)

Settlement and curtailment gain

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(1.6

)

Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)

 

 

44.8

 

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

(4.6

)

 

 

(1.4

)

Net amount recognized

 

$

68.1

 

 

$

(65.3

)

 

$

(9.8

)

 

$

20.7

 

  Pension Benefits Other Benefits
  2018 2017 2018 2017
Net actuarial gain $120.0
 $183.1
 $16.8
 $32.4
Amendments (0.6) (5.5) 17.2
 (0.4)
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) 2.9
 2.9
 (3.4) (6.6)
Settlement and curtailment loss 2.0
 13.8
 
 
Recognized net actuarial loss 3.4
 1.2
 
 0.5
Net amount recognized $127.7
 $195.5
 $30.6
 $25.9

88


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Weighted-Average Actuarial Assumptions Used to Determine Net Expense

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Discount rate

 

 

3.88

%

 

 

4.15

%

 

 

3.90

%

 

 

3.48

%

 

 

3.81

%

 

 

3.33

%

Long-term rate of return on plan assets

 

 

4.77

%

 

 

5.17

%

 

 

7.50

%

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

Long-term rate of compensation increase

 

N/A

 

 

 

3.63

%

 

 

3.63

%

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

  Pension Benefits Other Benefits
  2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Discount rate 3.90% 3.83% 4.10% 3.33% 3.18% 3.50%
Long-term rate of return on plan assets 7.50% 7.50% 7.75% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Long-term rate of compensation increase 3.63% 3.66% 3.70% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Beginning in fiscal 2017, the

The Company has elected to useuses a split discount rate (spot-rate approach) for the U.S. plans and certain foreign plans. Historically, a single weighted-average discount rate was used in the calculation of service and interest costs, both of which are components of pension benefit costs. The spot-rate approach applies separate discount rates for each projected benefit payment in the calculation of pension service and interest cost. This change is considered a change in accounting estimate and has been applied prospectively. The pre-tax reduction in total pension benefit cost associated with this change in fiscal 2017 was approximately $27.0 million.

We amortize prior service cost for our pension plans and postretirement plans, as well as amortizable gains and losses for our postretirement plans, in equal annual amounts over the average expected future period of vested service. For plans with no active participants, average life expectancy is used instead of average expected useful service.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) expected to be recognized as components of net expense during the next year are as follows:
  Pension Benefits Other Benefits
Prior service cost (benefit) $2.9
 $(2.2)
Net actuarial gain N/A
 (1.5)

Plan Assets

The fair value of plan assets, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy described in Note 20,19, as of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, was as follows:

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

10.1

 

 

$

71.9

 

 

$

 

 

$

82.0

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. equity securities

 

 

63.9

 

 

 

82.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

146.1

 

International equity securities

 

 

92.4

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

93.1

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government bonds

 

 

 

 

 

743.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

743.9

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

 

 

 

2,461.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,461.7

 

Mortgage-backed bonds

 

 

 

 

 

22.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

22.4

 

Real estate funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net receivables for unsettled transactions

 

 

30.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.2

 

Fair value measurement of pension plan assets in the

   fair value hierarchy

 

$

196.6

 

 

$

3,382.8

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,579.4

 

Investments measured at net asset value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

241.0

 

Total pension plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,820.4

 

  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and cash equivalents $1.0
 $65.0
 $
 $66.0
Equity securities:        
U.S. equity securities 319.8
 124.0
 
 443.8
International equity securities 256.5
 1.0
 
 257.5
Fixed income securities:        
Government bonds 
 1,854.8
 
 1,854.8
Corporate bonds 
 4.7
 
 4.7
Mortgage-backed bonds 
 9.3
 
 9.3
Real estate funds 7.7
 
 
 7.7
Master limited partnerships 0.4
 
 
 0.4
Net payables for unsettled transactions 10.9
 
 
 10.9
Fair value measurement of pension plan assets in the fair value hierarchy $596.3
 $2,058.8
 $
 $2,655.1
Investments measured at net asset value       700.0
Total pension plan assets 

 

 

 $3,355.1

89


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)


The fair value of plan assets, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy described in Note 20,19, as of May 28, 2017,26, 2019, was as follows:

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

0.7

 

 

$

77.7

 

 

$

 

 

$

78.4

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. equity securities

 

 

56.3

 

 

 

91.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

148.1

 

International equity securities

 

 

87.8

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

88.2

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government bonds

 

 

 

 

 

748.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

748.3

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

 

 

 

2,255.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,255.5

 

Mortgage-backed bonds

 

 

 

 

 

31.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.1

 

Real estate funds

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

Net receivables for unsettled transactions

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.6

 

Fair value measurement of pension plan assets in the

   fair value hierarchy

 

$

150.8

 

 

$

3,204.8

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,355.6

 

Investments measured at net asset value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

245.9

 

Total pension plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,601.5

 

  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and cash equivalents $1.0
 $94.0
 $
 $95.0
Equity securities:        
U.S. equity securities 494.0
 13.7
 
 507.7
International equity securities 249.9
 13.2
 
 263.1
Fixed income securities:        
Government bonds 51.1
 224.3
 
 275.4
Corporate bonds 4.4
 279.5
 
 283.9
Mortgage-backed bonds 63.3
 6.2
 
 69.5
Real estate funds 9.5
 
 
 9.5
Master limited partnerships 173.5
 
 
 173.5
Net receivables for unsettled transactions 0.7
 
 
 0.7
Fair value measurement of pension plan assets in the fair value hierarchy $1,047.4
 $630.9
 $
 $1,678.3
Investments measured at net asset value       1,305.3
Total pension plan assets       $2,983.6

Level 1 assets are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. The majority of the Level 1 assets listed above include the common stock of both U.S. and international companies, mutual funds, master limited partnership units, and real estate investment trusts, all of which are actively traded and priced in the market.

Level 2 assets are valued based on other significant observable inputs including quoted prices for similar securities, yield curves, indices, etc. Level 2 assets consist primarily of individual fixed income securities where values are based on quoted prices of similar securities and observable market data.

Level 3 assets consist of investments where active market pricing is not readily available and, as such, fair value is estimated using significant unobservable inputs.

Certain assets that are measured at fair value using the NAV (net asset value) per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. Such investments are generally considered long-term in nature with varying redemption availability. For certain of these investments, with a fair value of approximately $487.2$52.4 million as of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, the asset managers have the ability to impose customary redemption gates which may further restrict or limit the redemption of invested funds therein. As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, funds with a fair value of $0.1 million have imposed such gates.

As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, we have unfunded commitments for additional investments of $65.4$36.8 million in private equity funds and $26.7$13.5 million in natural resources funds. We expect unfunded commitments to be funded from plan assets rather than the general assets of the Company.

To develop the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for the pension plans, we consider the current asset allocation strategy, the historical investment performance, and the expectations for future returns of each asset class.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Our pension plan weighted-average asset allocations by asset category were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 31, 2020

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

Equity securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

7

%

Debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

85

%

 

 

85

%

Real estate funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

1

%

Private equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

3

%

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

4

%

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

  May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Equity securities 21% 39%
Debt securities 58% 25%
Real estate funds 10% 11%
Multi-strategy hedge funds 4% 11%
Private equity 4% 4%
Other 3% 10%
Total 100% 100%

90


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Due to the salaried pension plan freeze, the Company's pension asset strategy is now designed to align our pension plan assets with our projected benefit obligation to reduce volatility by targeting an investment strategy of approximately 90% in fixed-income securities and approximately 10% in return seeking assets, primarily equity securities, real estate, and private assets.

Other investments are primarily made up of cash and master limited partnerships.

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the benefit obligation of the postretirement plans.

Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates at:

 

 

 

 

 

May 31, 2020

 

 

May 26, 2019

 

Initial health care cost trend rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.22

%

 

 

7.20

%

Ultimate health care cost trend rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.4

%

 

 

4.5

%

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

 

 

 

 

 

2024

 

 

2024

 

Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates at: May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Initial health care cost trend rate 7.87% 8.44%
Ultimate health care cost trend rate 4.5% 4.5%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate 2024
 2024
A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost rates would have the following effect:
  
One Percent
Increase
 
One Percent
Decrease
Effect on total service and interest cost $0.3
 $(0.3)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation 3.9
 (3.5)

We currently anticipate making contributions of approximately $19.6$32.2 million to our pension plans in fiscal 2019.2021. We anticipate making contributions of $16.2$10.0 million to our other postretirement plans in fiscal 2019.2021. These estimates are based on ERISA guidelines, current tax laws, plan asset performance, and liability assumptions, which are subject to change.

The following table presents estimated future gross benefit payments for our plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension

Benefits

 

 

Health Care

and Life

Insurance

Benefits

 

2021

 

 

 

 

 

$

199.4

 

 

$

10.1

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

202.7

 

 

 

9.3

 

2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

204.7

 

 

 

8.5

 

2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

206.2

 

 

 

7.8

 

2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

207.6

 

 

 

7.1

 

Succeeding 5 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,038.0

 

 

 

27.3

 

  Pension Benefits 
Health Care and Life Insurance
Benefits
2019 $188.7
 $16.4
2020 184.2
 14.7
2021 186.5
 13.4
2022 189.0
 12.1
2023 191.3
 11.0
Succeeding 5 years 980.7
 40.1

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Multiemployer Pension Plans

The Company contributes to several multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under collective bargaining agreements that cover certain units of its union-represented employees. The risks of participating in such plans are different from the risks of single-employer plans, in the following respects:

a.

Assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.

b.

If a participating employer ceases to contribute to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.

c.

If the Company ceases to have an obligation to contribute to a multiemployer plan in which it had been a contributing employer, it may be required to pay to the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan and on the history of the Company's participation in the plan prior to the cessation of its obligation to contribute. The amount that an employer that has ceased to have an obligation to contribute to a multiemployer plan is required to pay to the plan is referred to as a withdrawal liability.

The Company's participation in multiemployer plans for the fiscal year ended May 27, 201831, 2020 is outlined in the table below. For each plan that is individually significant to the Company the following information is provided:

The "EIN / PN" column provides the Employer Identification Number and the three-digit plan number assigned to a plan by the Internal Revenue Service.

The "EIN / PN" column provides the Employer Identification Number

The most recent Pension Protection Act Zone Status available for 2019 and 2018 is for plan years that ended in calendar years 2019 and 2018, respectively. The zone status is based on information provided to the Company by each plan. A plan in the "red" zone has been determined to be in "critical status", based on criteria established under the Internal Revenue Code ("Code"), and is generally less than 65% funded. A plan in the "yellow" zone has been determined to be in "endangered status", based on criteria established under the Code, and is generally less than 80%

91


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and the three-digit plan number assigned to a plan by the Internal Revenue Service.

The most recent Pension Protection Act Zone Status available for 2017 and 2016 is for plan years that ended in calendar years 2017 and 2016, respectively. The zone status is based on information provided to the Company by each plan. A plan in the "red" zone has been determined to be in "critical status", based on criteria established under the Internal Revenue Code ("Code"), and is generally less than 65% funded. A plan in the "yellow" zone has been determined to be in "endangered status", based on criteria established under the Code, and is generally less than 80% funded. A plan in the "green" zone has been determined to be neither in "critical status" nor in "endangered status", and is generally at least 80% funded.
The "FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented" column indicates whether a Funding Improvement Plan, as required under the Code to be adopted by plans in the "yellow" zone, or a Rehabilitation Plan, as required under the Code to be adopted by plans in the "red" zone, is pending or has been implemented by the plan as of the end of the plan year that ended in calendar year 2017.
Contributions by the Company are the amounts contributed in the Company's fiscal periods ending in the specified year.
The "Surcharge Imposed" column indicates whether the Company contribution rate for its fiscal year that ended on May 27, 2018 included an amount

(columnar dollars in addition to the contribution rate specified in the applicable collective bargaining agreement, as imposed by a plan in "critical status", in accordance with the requirements of the Code.millions except per share amounts)

funded. A plan in the "green" zone has been determined to be neither in "critical status" nor in "endangered status", and is generally at least 80% funded.

The last column lists the expiration dates of the collective bargaining agreements pursuant to which the Company contributes to the plans.

The "FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented" column indicates whether a Funding Improvement Plan, as required under the Code to be adopted by plans in the "yellow" zone, or a Rehabilitation Plan, as required under the Code to be adopted by plans in the "red" zone, is pending or has been implemented by the plan as of the end of the plan year that ended in calendar year 2019.

Contributions by the Company are the amounts contributed in the Company's fiscal periods ending in the specified year.

The "Surcharge Imposed" column indicates whether the Company contribution rate for its fiscal year that ended on May 31, 2020 included an amount in addition to the contribution rate specified in the applicable collective bargaining agreement, as imposed by a plan in "critical status", in accordance with the requirements of the Code.

The last column lists the expiration dates of the collective bargaining agreements pursuant to which the Company contributes to the plans.

For plans that are not individually significant to Conagra Brands the total amount of contributions is presented in the aggregate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension Protection

Act Zone Status

 

 

FIP /

RP Status

 

 

Contributions by the

Company (millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration

Dates of

Collective

Pension Fund

 

 

EIN / PN

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

Pending /

Implemented

 

 

FY20

 

 

 

FY19

 

 

 

FY18

 

 

 

Surcharge

Imposed

 

 

Bargaining

Agreements

Bakery and Confectionary

   Union and Industry

   International

   Pension Plan

 

 

52-6118572

/ 001

 

 

Red,

Critical and

Declining

 

 

Red,

Critical and

Declining

 

 

RP

Implemented

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

 

$

1.5

 

 

 

No

 

 

N/A

Central States,

   Southeast and

   Southwest Areas

   Pension Fund

 

 

36-6044243

/ 001

 

 

Red,

Critical and

Declining

 

 

Red,

Critical and

Declining

 

 

RP

Implemented

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

No

 

 

5/31/2021

Western Conference of

   Teamsters Pension Plan

 

 

91-6145047

/ 001

 

 

Green

 

 

Green

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

No

 

 

6/30/2021

Other Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

6.5

 

 

 

$

6.0

 

 

 

$

6.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

  
  
Pension Protection Act
Zone Status
FIP /
RP Status
Pending /
Implemented
Contributions by
the Company
(millions)
  
Expiration
Dates of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreements
Pension FundEIN / PN20172016FY18FY17FY16
Surcharge
Imposed
Bakery and Confectionary Union and Industry International Pension Plan52-6118572
/ 001
Red, Critical and DecliningRed, Critical and DecliningRP Implemented$1.5
$1.8
$3.1No2/28/2020
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund36-6044243
/ 001
Red, Critical and DecliningRedRP Implemented1.8
1.8
1.9No5/31/2020
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan91-6145047
/ 001
GreenGreenN/A2.8
4.0
5.4No06/30/2018
Other Plans0.4
0.4
0.7  
Total Contributions$6.5
$8.0$11.1  

The Company was not listed in the Forms 5500 filed by any of the other plans or for any of the other years as providing more than 5% of the plan's total contributions. At the date our financial statements were issued, Forms 5500 were not available for plan years ending in calendar year 2017.

On May 31, 2018, subsequent to the end of2019.

During fiscal 2018,2019, we ceased to participate in the Bakery and Confectionary Union and Industry International Fund in conjunction with our sale of the Trenton, Missouri plant.

In addition to the contributions listed in the table above, we recorded an additional expense of $0.6 million, $4.0$0.3 million and $31.8$0.6 million in fiscal 2018, 2017,2019 and 2016,2018, respectively, related to our expected incurrence of certain withdrawal costs.

Certain of our employees are covered under defined contribution plans. The expense related to these plans was $24.5$49.9 million, $18.0$39.9 million, and $35.4$24.5 million in fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.


20.

19. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price assets or liabilities. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,

92


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, and

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The fair values of our Level 2 derivative instruments were determined using valuation models that use market observable inputs including interest rate curves and both forward and spot prices for currencies and commodities. Derivative assets and liabilities included in Level 2 primarily represent commodity and foreign currency option and forward contracts and cross-currency swaps.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 27, 2018:31, 2020:

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative assets

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

5.2

 

 

$

 

 

$

8.0

 

Marketable securities

 

 

8.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.1

 

Deferred compensation assets

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.6

 

Total assets

 

$

19.5

 

 

$

5.2

 

 

$

 

 

$

24.7

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative liabilities

 

$

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

0.4

 

Deferred compensation liabilities

 

 

68.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68.0

 

Total liabilities

 

$

68.0

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

68.4

 

 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:       
Derivative assets$1.7
 $2.7
 $
 $4.4
Available-for-sale securities4.8
 
 
 4.8
Total assets$6.5
 $2.7
 $
 $9.2
Liabilities:       
Derivative liabilities$
 $0.1
 $
 $0.1
Deferred compensation liabilities51.6
 
 
 51.6
Total liabilities$51.6
 $0.1
 $
 $51.7

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 28, 2017:26, 2019:

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative assets

 

$

3.0

 

 

$

2.9

 

 

$

 

 

$

5.9

 

Marketable securities

 

 

15.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.7

 

Deferred compensation assets

 

 

10.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.7

 

Total assets

 

$

29.4

 

 

$

2.9

 

 

$

 

 

$

32.3

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative liabilities

 

$

 

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

1.4

 

Deferred compensation liabilities

 

 

70.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70.4

 

Total liabilities

 

$

70.4

 

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

71.8

 

 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:       
Derivative assets$2.0
 $0.3
 $
 $2.3
Available-for-sale securities3.5
 
 
 3.5
Total assets$5.5
 $0.3
 $
 $5.8
Liabilities:       
Derivative liabilities$
 $1.3
 $
 $1.3
Deferred compensation liabilities47.2
 
 
 47.2
Total liabilities$47.2
 $1.3
 $
 $48.5

Certain assets and liabilities, including long-lived assets, goodwill, asset retirement obligations, and cost and equity investments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

During fiscal 2018, a charge of $4.7 million wasbasis using Level 3 inputs.

We recognized in the Corporate segmentcharges for the impairment of certain long-lived assets. The impairment was measured based upon the estimated sales price of the assets.

During fiscal 2017, a charge of $27.6 million was recognized in the Grocery & Snacks segment for the impairment of our Wesson® oil production facility. The impairment was measured based upon the estimated sales price of the facility (See Note 6).
During fiscal 2017, goodwill impairment charges totaling $198.9 million were recognized within our International segment. See Note 9 for discussion of the methodology employed to measure these impairments.
During fiscal 2018, we recognized indefinite-lived brand impairment charges of $4.0 million in our Grocery & Snacks segment and $0.8 million in our International segment. We recognized indefinite-lived brand impairment charges of $37.0 million in our International segment and $68.2 million in our Grocery & Snacks segment for fiscal 2017, and $50.1 million in our Grocery and Snacks segment for fiscal 2016.brands. The fair values of these brands were estimated using the "relief from royalty" method (See Note 9)8).
Impairments in our Grocery & Snacks segment totaled $46.4 million, $76.5 million, and $4.0 million for fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Impairments in our Refrigerated & Frozen segment totaled $110.8 million for fiscal 2020. Impairments in our International segment totaled $8.3 million, $13.1 million, and $0.8 million for fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

During fiscal 2020, we recognized impairment charges totaling $54.4 million in the Grocery & Snacks segment and $27.6 million in the Refrigerated & Frozen segment. The impairments were measured based upon the estimated sales price of the disposal group (See Note 6).

93


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We recognized charges totaling $3.8 million in the Refrigerated & Frozen segment in fiscal 2020, and charges totaling $2.7 million and $4.7 million within general corporate expenses in fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively, for the impairment of certain long-lived assets. The impairments were measured based upon the estimated sales price of the assets.

During fiscal 2020, we recognized charges of $2.9 million in general corporate expenses related to the impairments of ROU assets. The impairments were measured based upon a discounted cash flow approach.

The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current installments) was $3.54$9.75 billion as of May 27, 201831, 2020 and $2.97$10.68 billion as of May 28, 2017.26, 2019. Based on current market rates, the fair value of this debt (level 2 liabilities) at May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 201726, 2019 was estimated at $3.76$11.35 billion and $3.32$11.24 billion, respectively.



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

21.

20. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION

During

In the fiscal 2017,2020, we reorganized our reporting segments.segments to incorporate the Pinnacle business into our legacy reporting segments in order to better reflect how the business is now being managed. We now reflect our results of operations in five4 reporting segments: Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, International, Foodservice, and Commercial. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the Spinoff of Lamb Weston. The Lamb Weston business had previously been included in the Commercial segment. The results of operations of the Lamb Weston business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Foodservice.

The Grocery & Snacks reporting segment principally includes branded, shelf-stable food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.

The Refrigerated & Frozen reporting segment includes branded, temperature-controlled food products sold in various retail channels in the United States.

The International reporting segment principally includes branded food products, in various temperature states, sold in various retail and foodservice channels outside of the United States.

The Foodservice reporting segment includes branded and customized food products, including meals, entrees, sauces and a variety of custom-manufactured culinary products packaged for sale to restaurants and other foodservice establishments primarily in the United States.

The Commercial reporting segment included commercially branded and private label food and ingredients, which were sold primarily to commercial, restaurant, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items included a variety of vegetable, spice, and frozen bakery goods, which were sold under brands such as Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings®. The Spicetec and JM Swank businesses were sold in the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

We do not aggregate operating segments when determining our reporting segments.

Intersegment sales have been recorded at amounts approximating market.

94


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Operating profit for each of the segments is based on net sales less all identifiable operating expenses. General corporate expense, net interest expense, and income taxes have been excluded from segment operations.

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

$

4,617.1

 

 

$

3,923.6

 

 

$

3,281.0

 

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

4,559.6

 

 

 

3,735.4

 

 

 

2,753.0

 

International

 

 

925.3

 

 

 

864.4

 

 

 

843.5

 

Foodservice

 

 

952.4

 

 

 

1,015.0

 

 

 

1,060.8

 

Total net sales

 

$

11,054.4

 

 

$

9,538.4

 

 

$

7,938.3

 

Operating profit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grocery & Snacks

 

$

915.2

 

 

$

762.6

 

 

$

722.5

 

Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

702.2

 

 

 

645.1

 

 

 

479.4

 

International

 

 

100.6

 

 

 

99.8

 

 

 

86.5

 

Foodservice

 

 

97.6

 

 

 

134.3

 

 

 

124.1

 

Total operating profit

 

$

1,815.6

 

 

$

1,641.8

 

 

$

1,412.5

 

Equity method investment earnings

 

 

73.2

 

 

 

75.8

 

 

 

97.3

 

General corporate expenses

 

 

368.5

 

 

 

462.2

 

 

 

459.4

 

Pension and postretirement non-service income

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

35.1

 

 

 

80.4

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

487.1

 

 

 

391.4

 

 

 

158.7

 

Income tax expense

 

 

201.3

 

 

 

218.8

 

 

 

174.6

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

841.8

 

 

$

680.3

 

 

$

797.5

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of continuing operations

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

3.4

 

Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

 

$

840.1

 

 

$

680.2

 

 

$

794.1

 

The following table presents further disaggregation of our net sales:


 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Snacks

 

$

1,714.3

 

 

$

1,496.9

 

 

$

1,197.7

 

Other shelf-stable

 

 

2,902.8

 

 

 

2,426.7

 

 

 

2,083.3

 

Frozen

 

 

3,674.1

 

 

 

2,945.4

 

 

 

2,014.8

 

Refrigerated

 

 

885.5

 

 

 

790.0

 

 

 

738.2

 

International

 

 

925.3

 

 

 

864.4

 

 

 

843.5

 

Foodservice

 

 

952.4

 

 

 

1,015.0

 

 

 

1,060.8

 

Total net sales

 

$

11,054.4

 

 

$

9,538.4

 

 

$

7,938.3

 

95


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and May 29, 2016

27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)


 2018 2017 2016
Net sales     
Grocery & Snacks$3,287.0
 $3,208.8
 $3,377.1
Refrigerated & Frozen2,753.0
 2,652.7
 2,867.8
International843.5
 816.0
 846.6
Foodservice1,054.8
 1,078.3
 1,104.5
Commercial
 71.1
 468.1
Total net sales$7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 $8,664.1
Operating profit     
Grocery & Snacks$724.8
 $653.7
 $592.9
Refrigerated & Frozen479.4
 445.8
 420.4
International86.5
 (168.9) 66.7
Foodservice121.8
 105.1
 97.7
Commercial
 202.6
 45.4
Total operating profit$1,412.5
 $1,238.3
 $1,223.1
Equity method investment earnings97.3
 71.2
 66.1
General corporate expenses379.0
 313.3
 818.5
Interest expense, net158.7
 195.5
 295.8
Income tax expense174.6
 254.7
 46.4
Income from continuing operations$797.5
 $546.0
 $128.5
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of continuing operations3.4
 1.9
 1.9
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.$794.1
 $544.1
 $126.6
Net sales by product type were:
 2018 2017 2016
Shelf-stable$4,660.1
 $4,682.4
 $5,256.8
Temperature-controlled3,278.2
 3,144.5
 3,407.3
Total net sales$7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 $8,664.1

Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) forfrom Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results

Derivatives used to manage commodity price risk and foreign currency risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings. In the event that management determines a particular derivative entered into as an economic hedge of a forecasted commodity purchase has ceased to function as an economic hedge, we cease recognizing further gains and losses on such derivatives in corporate expense and begin recognizing such gains and losses within segment operating results, immediately.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions, under this methodology:

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net derivative losses incurred

 

$

(12.9

)

 

$

(3.6

)

 

$

(0.9

)

Less: Net derivative losses allocated to reporting segments

 

 

(7.4

)

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

(7.1

)

Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses

 

$

(5.5

)

 

$

(1.8

)

 

$

6.2

 

Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Grocery & Snacks

 

$

(4.7

)

 

$

(2.5

)

 

$

0.2

 

Net derivative losses allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

(0.3

)

Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to International

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

(6.9

)

Net derivative losses allocated to Foodservice

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Net derivative losses included in segment operating profit

 

$

(7.4

)

 

$

(1.8

)

 

$

(7.1

)

 2018 2017 2016
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred$(0.9) $0.6
 $(7.4)
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments(7.1) 5.7
 (23.8)
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses$6.2
 $(5.1) $16.4
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Grocery & Snacks$0.2
 $3.4
 $(14.4)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen(0.3) 0.8
 (6.2)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to International(6.9) 1.6
 (0.5)
Net derivative losses allocated to Foodservice(0.1) 
 (1.0)
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial
 (0.1) (1.7)
Net derivative gains (losses) included in segment operating profit$(7.1) $5.7
 $(23.8)

As of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, the cumulative amount of net derivative gainslosses from economic hedges that had been recognized in general corporate expenses and not yet allocated to reporting segments was $3.2$4.1 million. This amount reflected net losses of $4.5 million all of which was incurred during the fiscal year ended May 27, 2018.31, 2020, as well as net gains of $0.4 million incurred prior to fiscal 2020. Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results gainsnet losses of $2.5$2.1 million in fiscal 20192021 and $0.7$2.0 million in fiscal 20202022 and thereafter.


Assets by Segment


The majority of our manufacturing assets are shared across multiple reporting segments. Output from these facilities used by each reporting segment can change over time. Also, working capital balances are not tracked by reporting segment. Therefore, it is impracticable to allocate those assets to the reporting segments, as well as disclose total assets by segment. Total depreciation expense for fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018 2017,was $329.1 million, $283.9 million, and 2016 was $222.1 million, $234.4 million, and $243.9 million, respectively.

Other Information

Our operations are principally in the United States. With respect to operations outside of the United States, no single foreign country or geographic region was significant with respect to consolidated operations for fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016.2018. Foreign net sales, including sales by domestic segments to customers located outside of the United States, were approximately $918.4$946.8 million, $887.2$919.5 million, and $937.9$918.4 million in fiscal 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. Our long-lived assets located outside of the United States are not significant.

Our largest customer, Walmart, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 26% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2020 and 24% of consolidated net sales for botheach of fiscal 20182019 and 2017 and 23% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2016,2018, significantly impacting the Grocery & Snacks and Refrigerated & Frozen segments.

96


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2020, May 26, 2019, and May 27, 2018

(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Walmart, Inc. and its affiliates accounted for approximately 25% and 26%30% of consolidated net receivables as of each of May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 2017, respectively.

26, 2019. At May 31, 2020, The Kroger Co. and its affiliates accounted for approximately 10% of consolidated net receivables.

We offer certain suppliers access to a third-party service that allows them to view our scheduled payments online. The third-party service also allows suppliers to finance advances on our scheduled payments at the sole discretion of the supplier and the third-party. We have no economic interest in these financing arrangements and no direct relationship with the suppliers, the third-party, or any financial institutions concerning this service. All of our accounts payable remain as obligations to our suppliers as stated in our supplier agreements. As of May 27, 2018, $103.1 million ofOf our total accounts payable, is$258.7 million and $189.3 million were payable to suppliers who utilize this third-party service.



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Endedservice as of May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017,31, 2020 and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

22.26, 2019, respectively.

21. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

First

Quarter

 

 

Second

Quarter

 

 

Third

Quarter

 

 

Fourth

Quarter

 

 

First

Quarter

 

 

Second

Quarter

 

 

Third

Quarter

 

 

Fourth

Quarter

 

Net sales

 

$

2,390.7

 

 

$

2,820.8

 

 

$

2,555.0

 

 

$

3,287.9

 

 

$

1,834.4

 

 

$

2,383.7

 

 

$

2,707.1

 

 

$

2,613.2

 

Gross profit

 

 

664.5

 

 

 

797.9

 

 

 

684.4

 

 

 

922.8

 

 

 

515.5

 

 

 

677.2

 

 

 

752.3

 

 

 

708.0

 

Income from continuing operations, net of tax

 

 

174.3

 

 

 

261.5

 

 

 

204.7

 

 

 

201.3

 

 

 

178.2

 

 

 

134.3

 

 

 

242.6

 

 

 

125.2

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.

 

 

173.8

 

 

 

260.5

 

 

 

204.4

 

 

 

201.4

 

 

 

178.2

 

 

 

131.6

 

 

 

242.0

 

 

 

126.5

 

Earnings per share (1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

$

0.36

 

 

$

0.53

 

 

$

0.42

 

 

$

0.41

 

 

$

0.45

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

0.50

 

 

$

0.26

 

Diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders

 

$

0.36

 

 

$

0.53

 

 

$

0.42

 

 

$

0.41

 

 

$

0.45

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

0.50

 

 

$

0.26

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

$

0.2125

 

 

$

0.2125

 

 

$

0.2125

 

 

$

0.2125

 

 

$

0.2125

 

 

$

0.2125

 

 

$

0.2125

 

 

$

0.2125

 

 2018 2017
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
Net sales$1,804.2
 $2,173.4
 $1,994.5
 $1,966.2
 $1,895.6
 $2,088.4
 $1,981.2
 $1,861.7
Gross profit519.0
 658.3
 598.8
 575.4
 544.6
 647.5
 621.0
 529.0
Income from continuing operations, net of tax153.6
 224.1
 349.2
 70.6
 98.6
 114.3
 179.5
 153.6
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(0.3) 0.4
 14.5
 (0.3) 91.4
 11.6
 0.7
 (1.7)
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.152.5
 223.5
 362.8
 69.6
 186.2
 122.1
 179.7
 151.3
Earnings per share (1):
               
Basic earnings per share:               
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$0.37
 $0.55
 $0.91
 $0.18
 $0.42
 $0.28
 $0.42
 $0.36
Diluted earnings per share:               
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$0.36
 $0.54
 $0.90
 $0.18
 $0.42
 $0.28
 $0.41
 $0.36
Dividends declared per common share (3)
$0.2125
 $0.2125
 $0.2125
 $0.2125
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.20
 $0.20
Share price (2):
               
High$39.95
 $35.87
 $38.50
 $38.29
 $48.39
 $48.68
 $41.16
 $41.50
Low33.07
 32.43
 35.47
 35.34
 45.70
 34.30
 36.47
 37.29

(1)

Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated independently for each of the quarters presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly earnings per share amounts may not agree with the total year.

(2)
Historical market prices do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the Lamb Weston Spinoff.
(3)
Per share dividend declared in the third quarter and fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 includes impact of the Lamb Weston Spinoff.




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Stockholders and Board of Directors


Conagra Brands, Inc.:

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Conagra Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 2017,26, 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations,earnings, comprehensive income, (loss), common stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of May 27, 201831, 2020 and May 28, 2017,26, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2018,31, 2020 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and


directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill

As described in Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s goodwill was $11.44 billion as of May 31, 2020.  Annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate potential asset impairment has occurred, the Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill.  The Company performed a quantitative impairment test of goodwill during its first fiscal quarter in connection with a reorganization of its segments. In the fourth fiscal quarter, the Company performed a qualitative assessment for its required annual goodwill impairment evaluation. The results of the quantitative impairment test indicated that all but three reporting units had an estimated fair value substantially in excess of the carrying value. The aggregate goodwill in the three reporting units where the fair value was not substantially in excess of the carrying value was $3.49 billion.  For the qualitative assessment in the fourth fiscal quarter, the Company determined for all the reporting units, that it was not more likely than not that the estimated fair value was less than the carrying values.  

We identified the evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill as a critical audit matter.  Subjective and challenging auditor judgment was required to evaluate certain assumptions and information used in the Company’s first fiscal quarter quantitative impairment test and its fourth fiscal quarter qualitative impairment assessment for the three reporting units where the fair value was not substantially in excess of the carrying value.  Specifically, for the quantitative impairment test, these assumptions included forecasted revenue growth rates including the terminal growth rates, and margin growth rates used in determining the forecasted cash flows and the selection of discount rates.  For the qualitative impairment assessment for the three reporting units, the information included evaluating the industry, macroeconomic and market considerations, overall financial performance, and other relevant entity-specific events affecting the reporting units.    

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following.  We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s evaluation of the assumptions used to determine the fair value of the reporting units, as well as the controls over the Company’s annual qualitative impairment assessment. We evaluated the Company’s ability to forecast cash flows by comparing historical forecasts to actual results and forecasted cash flows with the Company’s most recent plans. We also considered current industry, macroeconomic and market conditions, the Company’s historical results and the results of other guideline companies within the same industry in evaluating the assumptions described above.   We evaluated the Company’s qualitative impairment assessment by considering any event specific changes to the reporting units, analyst industry reports, and the Company’s latest available forecasted financial information.   We involved our valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in:

evaluating the discount rates used by the Company by comparing the Company’s inputs to the discount rates to publicly available data for comparable entities and assessing the resulting discount rate;

evaluating the terminal growth rates by comparing them with publicly available market data; and

testing the estimate of the fair value of the reporting units using the Company’s cash flow assumptions and discount rates and comparing the results to the Company’s fair value estimate.

Evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying value of certain indefinite-lived intangible assets  

As described in Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets (consisting primarily of brand names and trademarks) were $3.40 billion as of May 31, 2020.  For the year ended May 31, 2020, the Company recorded impairment charges totaling $165.5 million on indefinite-lived intangible assets.  In assessing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment, the Company performs either a qualitative or quantitative


assessment at least annually or whenever circumstances indicate a potential impairment exists.  When a quantitative assessment is performed, the Company estimates the fair value of the intangibles by utilizing a discounted cash flow model that incorporates an estimated royalty rate that would be charged to a third party for the use of the brand.   Impairment charges are recorded for any intangibles with carrying values in excess of the estimated fair values.    

We identified the evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying value of certain indefinite-lived intangible assets for which a quantitative impairment assessment is performed as a critical audit matter.  Subjective and challenging auditor judgment was required to evaluate certain assumptions used in determining the fair value of these assets.  Specifically, there was a high degree of judgment required in evaluating assumptions related to the forecasted revenue growth rates including the terminal growth rates and forecasted margins, royalty rates and discount rates.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following.  We tested certain internal controls over the quantitative impairment assessments, including controls over the development of the assumptions described above. To assess the Company’s ability to forecast, we compared historical forecasts to actual results. We evaluated the forecasted revenue growth rates including terminal growth rates and forecasted margins used to support the royalty rates by considering current and past performance of the brand names, as well as external market and industry outlook data.  We also involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted for certain brand names intangibles in:

evaluating the discount rates used by the Company by comparing the Company’s inputs to the discount rates to publicly available data for comparable entities and assessing the resulting discount rate;

evaluating the terminal growth rates by comparing them with publicly available market data;

evaluating the royalty rates by determining that the selected royalty rates are supported by the associated brand name’s margin; and

testing the estimated brand names fair values using the Company’s assumptions and comparing the results to the Company’s fair value estimate.

/s/ KPMG LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2005.

Omaha, Nebraska
July 24, 2020


Omaha, Nebraska
July 20, 2018



ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company's management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of May 27, 2018.31, 2020. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures arewere effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report and determined that there was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 20182020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Conagra Brands' management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of Conagra Brands (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Conagra Brands' internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Conagra Brands' internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Conagra Brands; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of Conagra Brands are being made only in accordance with the authorization of management and directors of Conagra Brands; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of Conagra Brands' assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of the changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


With the participation of Conagra Brands' Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of Conagra Brands' internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2018.31, 2020. In making this assessment, management used criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). As a result of this assessment, management concluded that, as of May 27, 2018,31, 2020, its internal control over financial reporting was effective.


The effectiveness of Conagra Brands' internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 201831, 2020 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, a copy of which is included in this annual report on Form 10-K.


/s/ SEAN M. CONNOLLY

/s/ DAVID S. MARBERGER

Sean M. Connolly

David S. Marberger

President and Chief Executive Officer

July 20, 2018

/s/ DAVID S. MARBERGER
David S. Marberger

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

July 20, 201824, 2020

July 24, 2020



ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.


None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information with respect to our directors will be set forth in the 20182020 Proxy Statement under the heading "Voting Item #1: Election of Directors," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.

There were no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board during fiscal 2020.

Information regarding our executive officers is included in Part I of this Form 10-K under the heading "Executive"Information About Our Executive Officers, of the Registrant as of July 20, 2018," as permitted by the Instruction 3 to Item 401(b)401 of Regulation S-K.

Information

If applicable, information with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by our directors, executive officers, and holders of more than ten percent of our equity securities will be set forth in the 20182020 Proxy Statement under the heading "Information on Stock Ownership—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.

Information with respect to the Audit / Finance Committee and its financial experts will be set forth in the 20182020 Proxy Statement under the heading "Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—RolesHow We Govern and Responsibilities of the Board and its Committees—are Governed—The Board's Audit / Finance Committee," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller.  This code of ethics is available on our website at www.conagrabrands.com through the "Investors—Corporate Governance" link.  If we make any amendments to this code other than technical, administrative, or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of this code of conduct to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or Controller, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date, and to whom it applies on our website at www.conagrabrands.com through the "Investors—Corporate Governance" link.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information with respect to director and executive compensation and our Human Resources Committee will be set forth in the 20182020 Proxy Statement under the headings "Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Non-Employee Director Compensation,How We Are Paid," "Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Roles and Responsibilities of the Board and its Committees—How We Govern—The Board's Human Resources Committee," "Compensation Committee Report," and "Executive Compensation," and "CEO Pay Ratio" and the information is incorporated herein by reference.




ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners, directors and management will be set forth in the 20182020 Proxy Statement under the heading "Information on Stock Ownership," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information about shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants, and rights under existing equity compensation plans as of our most recent fiscal year-end, May 27, 2018.31, 2020.

Plan Category

 

Number of Securities to

be Issued Upon Exercise

of Outstanding Options,

Warrants, and Rights

(a)

 

 

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants, and Rights

(b)

 

 

Number of Securities

Remaining Available for

Future Issuance Under

Equity Compensation Plans

(Excluding Securities

Reflected in Column (a))

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved

by security holders (1)

 

 

8,165,639

 

 

$

30.07

 

 

 

40,612,401

 

Equity compensation plans not

approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

8,165,639

 

 

$

30.07

 

 

 

40,612,401

 

Plan Category 
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights
(a)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants, and
Rights
(b)
 
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) 8,437,925
 $28.11
 42,456,481
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 
 
 
Total 8,437,925
 $28.11
 42,456,481

(1)

(1)

Column (a) includes 1,130,2921,485,214 shares that could be issued under performance shares outstanding at May 27, 2018.31, 2020. The performance shares are earned and common stock issued if pre-set financial objectives are met. Included are 402,666 shares for two-thirds of the fiscal 2016 through 2018 performance period and one-third of the fiscal 2017 through 2019 performance period, for which the performance has been determined. For the remaining performance periods, actualActual shares issued may be


equal to, less than, or greater than the number of outstanding performance shares included in column (a), depending on actual performance. Column (b) does not take these awards into account because they do not have an exercise price. The number of shares reflected in column (a) with respect to these performance shares for which the performance has not been determined assumes the vesting criteria will be achieved at target levels. Column (c) has not been reduced for the performance shares outstanding. Column (a) also includes 184,686 shares that could be issued under performance-based restricted stock units outstanding at May 31, 2020. The performance-based restricted stock units are earned and common stock issued if pre-set market-based objectives are met. Actual shares issued may be equal to, less than, or greater than the number of outstanding performance-based restricted stock units included in column (a), depending on actual performance. Column (b) does not take these awards into account because they do not have an exercise price. Column (c) has not been reduced for the performance-based restricted stock units outstanding. The number of shares reflected in column (a) with respect to these performance-based restricted stock units assumes the vesting criteria will be achieved at target levels. Column (b) also excludes 1,775,2942,382,435 restricted stock units and 416,496331,899 deferral interests in deferred compensation plans that are included in column (a) but do not have an exercise price. The units vest and are payable in common stock after expiration of the time periods set forth in the related agreements. The interests in the deferred compensation plans are settled in common stock on the schedules selected by the participants.


Information with respect to director independence and certain relationships and related transactions will be set forth in the 20182020 Proxy Statement under the headings "Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Consideration of How We are Selected, Evaluated and Organized—Director Independence," "Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Roles and Responsibilities of the Board and its Committees—How We Govern—The Board's Audit / Finance Committee," and "Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Roles and Responsibilities of the Board and its Committees—How We Govern—The Board's Human Resources Committee" and the information is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information with respect to the principal accountant will be set forth in the 20182020 Proxy Statement under the heading "Voting Item #2: Ratification of the Appointment of Our Independent Auditor for Fiscal 2019,2021," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.



PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

a)

List of documents filed as part of this report:

a)    List of documents filed as part of this report:

1.

Financial Statements

1.    Financial Statements

All financial statements of the Company as set forth under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2.

Financial Statement Schedules

2.    Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements, notes thereto.

3.

Exhibits

3.    Exhibits

All documents referenced below were filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by Conagra Brands, Inc. (file number 001-07275), unless otherwise noted.


EXHIBIT

DESCRIPTION

EXHIBIT

*2.1

DESCRIPTION
*2.1

*2.1.1

*2.1.2

*2.1.3

*2.1.4

*2.1.5

*2.2

*2.2.1

2.2.2




4.1

Indenture, dated as of October 8, 1990, between Conagra Brands, Inc. (formerly ConAgra Foods, Inc.) and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association)), as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Conagra Brands’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 033-36967)

4.2

4.2.1

**10.1

4.2.2

**10.1.1

4.3

**10.210.1

**10.2.110.1.1

**10.2.210.1.2

**10.2.310.1.3

**10.2.410.1.4

**10.310.2

**10.3.1


**10.3.2
**10.4
**10.4.1
**10.4.2
**10.4.3
**10.4.4

**10.4.510.3

**10.4.6
**10.4.7

**10.4.810.3.1

**10.510.3.2

**10.5.1


**10.5.210.3.3

**10.5.310.4

**10.5.4
**10.5.4.1
**10.5.5


**10.6

**10.6.110.4.1

**10.6.210.4.2

**10.6.310.4.3

**10.6.410.5

**10.6.4.1
**10.6.4.2
**10.6.5
**10.6.6
**10.6.7
**10.6.8
**10.7

**10.7.110.5.1

**10.7.210.5.2

**10.7.310.5.3

**10.7.410.5.4

**10.7.510.5.5




**10.5.10

Form of CEO Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Conagra Brands’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 28, 2009April 16, 2019

**10.910.5.11

**10.6

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Conagra Brands’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 19, 2020

**10.7

ConAgra Foods, Inc. 2014 Executive Incentive Plan incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Conagra Brands’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 22, 2014

**10.1010.8

**10.10.110.8.1

**10.1110.9

**10.12
**10.13
**10.14
**10.15

**10.1610.10

**10.1710.11

**10.1810.12

**10.18.110.12.1

**10.1910.12.2

**10.13

Form of Executive Time Sharing Agreement, as adopted on February 18, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of Conagra Brands’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015

**10.2010.14




10.23

10.16

10.24
10.25
10.26
10.27
10.28

10.29

10.17

10.30

10.18

10.30.1
10.30.2
10.30.3
10.31



10.19

**10.32
10.33
10.33.1
10.34

10.34.1

10.19.1

12

21

21

23

24

31.1

31.2

32

101

The following materials from Conagra Brands' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 27, 2018,31, 2020, formatted in Inline XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations,Earnings, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (Loss), (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vii) document and entity information.

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL document and contained in Exhibit 101)

* Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2)601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. Conagra Brands agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any omitted schedule upon request.

** Management contract or compensatory plan.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of Regulation S-K, certain instruments with respect to Conagra Brands' long-term debt are not filed with this Form 10-K. Conagra Brands will furnish a copy of any such long-term debt agreement to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Conagra Brands, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.

By:

/s/ SEAN M. CONNOLLY

Sean M. Connolly

President and Chief Executive Officer

July 20, 201824, 2020

By:

/s/ DAVID S. MARBERGER

David S. Marberger

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

July 20, 201824, 2020

By:

/s/  ROBERT G. WISE

Robert G. Wise

Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

July 20, 201824, 2020


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 20th24th day of July, 2018.

2020.

Sean M. Connolly*

Director

Bradley A. Alford*

Anil Arora*

Director

Anil Arora*Director

Thomas K. Brown*

Director

Stephen G. Butler*

Director

Thomas W. Dickson*Director
Steven F. Goldstone*Director

Joie A. Gregor*

Director

Rajive Johri*

Director

Richard H. Lenny*

Director

Melissa Lora*

Director

Ruth Ann Marshall*

Director

Craig P. Omtvedt*

Director

Scott Ostfeld*

Director

*     David S. Marberger, by signing his name hereto, signs this annual report on Form 10-K on behalf of each person indicated. Powers-of-Attorney authorizing David S. Marberger to sign this annual report on Form 10-K on behalf of each of the indicated Directors of Conagra Brands, Inc. have been filed herewith as Exhibit 24.

*

David S. Marberger, by signing his name hereto, signs this annual report on Form 10-K on behalf of each person indicated. Powers-of-Attorney authorizing David S. Marberger to sign this annual report on Form 10-K on behalf of each of the indicated Directors of Conagra Brands, Inc. have been filed herewith as Exhibit 24.

By:

By:

/s/  DAVID S. MARBERGER

David S. Marberger

Attorney-In-Fact



111