Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
 (MARK(MARK ONE)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162019
or
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to      
Commission file number: 001-09318
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 13-2670991
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California94403
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
RegistrantsOne Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, CA 94403
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(650) 312-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (650) 312-2000code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $.10$0.10 per shareBENNew York Stock Exchange
SecuritiesSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes      No
x  YES    o  NO
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes     No
o  YES   x  NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes      No
x  YES    o  NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    
x  YES    o  NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x  Yes      No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer     x
Accelerated filer     o
Large Accelerated Filer
Accelerated Filer
Non-accelerated filer     o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Filer
Smaller reporting company    oReporting Company
Emerging Growth Company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o  YES   x  NO  Yes     No
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity (“common stock”) held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of March 31, 201629, 2019 (the last business day of registrant’s second quarter of fiscal year 20162019), was $14.0$9.4 billion based upon the last sale price reported for such date on the New York Stock Exchange.
Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at October 31, 2016: 568,805,502.2019: 498,070,319.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after September 30, 20162019, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.



Table of Contents

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FORM 10-K
ITEM
 
PAGE
NUMBER
  
 ITEM 1.3
 ITEM 1A.1918
 ITEM 1B.2728
 ITEM 2.2728
 ITEM 3.2729
 ITEM 4.2729
 2729
  
 ITEM 5.2931
 ITEM 6.3032
 ITEM 7.3133
 ITEM 7A.55
 ITEM 8.57
 ITEM 9.9495
 ITEM 9A.9495
 ITEM 9B.9495
  
 ITEM 10.9496
 ITEM 11.9496
 ITEM 12.9596
 ITEM 13.9596
 ITEM 14.9596
  
 ITEM 15.9697
 ITEM 16.9897
97
99





2

Table of Contents


PART I
Forward-looking Statements. In addition to historical information, this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors, including the risks and other factors discussed in Item 1A (“Risk Factors”), that could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from any future results or outcomes expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. When used in this report, words or phrases generally written in the future tense and/or preceded by words such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “estimate” or other similar words are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Moreover, statements in Risk Factors, “Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this report that speculate about future events are forward-looking statements.
While forward-looking statements are our best prediction at the time that they are made, you should not rely on them and are cautioned against doing so. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. If a circumstance occurs after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K that causes any of our forward-looking statements to be inaccurate, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, we do not have an obligation, and we undertake no obligation, to announce publicly the change to our expectations, or to make any revision to our forward-looking statements, unless required by law.
Item 1.Business.
Item 1.Business.
OVERVIEW
Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin”) is a holding company that, together with its various subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), operates as Franklin Templeton Investments®. We are a global investment management organization that provides investment management and related services to retail, institutional and high net-worth clients in jurisdictions worldwide. We believe in the value of active investment management, as well as in building on our strengths to pursue alternative strategies to meet the evolving needs of our clients. We are committed to delivering strong investment performance for our clients by drawing on the experience and perspective gained through our nearly 70-year history in the investment management business. The common stock of Franklin is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “BEN,” and is included in the Standard & Poors 500 Index. In this report, words such as “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to the Company.
We offer our investmentservices and products and services under our various distinct brand names, including, but not limited to, Franklin®, Templeton®, Balanced Equity Management®, Benefit Street Partners®, Darby®, Edinburgh Partners™, Fiduciary Trust™, Franklin Bissett®, Franklin Mutual Series®, Franklin BissettK2®, Fiduciary Trust™, Darby and LibertyShares®, Balanced Equity Management®, K2®and LibertyShares™brand names.. Unless otherwise indicated, our “funds” means the investment funds offered under our brand names.
AsWe are a global investment management organization that provides investment management and related services to retail, institutional and high-net-worth investors in jurisdictions worldwide through our investment products. We offer active, passive and smart beta strategies and have expertise across all asset classes, including equity, fixed income, alternatives and custom multi-asset solutions. For more than 70 years, we have been dedicated to providing clients with exceptional investment management. Since our founding in 1947, we have successfully navigated the world’s financial markets and have developed a globally diversified business. We offer clients the combined experience of September 30, 2016,our investment professionals with expertise across asset classes and a sharp focus on managing risk. We are committed to delivering strong investment performance for our clients by offering a broad range of strategies and drawing on the experience and perspective gained through our long history in the investment management business.
We know that success demands smart and effective business innovation, solutions and technologies, and we had $733.3 billion in assets under management (“AUM”). remain committed to focusing on investment excellence, innovating to meet evolving client goals, and building strong partnerships by delivering superior client service. We continue to focus on the long-term investment performance of our investment products and on providing high-quality-customer service to our clients.
Our investment products include investmentour sponsored funds, as well as institutional and institutional, high net-worthhigh-net-worth separate accounts, and separately-managed accounts (collectively, our “sponsored investment products” or “SIPs”).sub-advised products. Our investment funds include U.S.-registered funds (“U.S. Funds”), non-U.S.-registered funds (“Non-U.S. Funds”),registered and unregistered funds. In addition to investment management, our product services include fund administration, sales and distribution, marketing,and shareholder servicing, and other fiduciary services.servicing. We may perform services directly or through third parties. We offer a broad product mix under ourof equity, hybrid,multi-asset/balanced, fixed income and cash management investment objectives and solutions that meet a variety of investment goals and needs for different investors. We also provide sub-advisory services to certain investment products sponsored by other companies whichthat may be sold to investors under the brand names of those other companies or on a co-branded basis.
In 2016, we introduced

3

Table of Contents

We believe that mutual funds remain a critical tool to make professional investment management affordable for a broad range of investors. Our U.S.-registered funds and most of our Franklin LibertyShares platformnon-U.S.-registered funds operate as independent companies subject to the supervision and oversight of strategic beta and actively managed exchange-tradedthe funds (“ETFs”). Our new ETF platform generally seeks to provide investors with additional investment options versus traditional market capitalization weighted index products.
own boards of directors or trustees. Most of the investmentour funds we manage are registered open-end mutual funds that continuously offer their shares to investors. We also offer registered closed-end funds that issue a set number of shares to investors in a public offering and the shares are then traded on a public stock exchange. The registered funds are independent companies under the supervision and oversight of the funds own boards of directors or trustees. SinceBecause the funds themselves do not have direct employees to support



3

Table of Contents

their operations, the funds contract with separate entities, such as our subsidiaries toeither provide or arrange for the investment and other management and related services theythat our funds require. An investment advisory entity manages a funds portfolio of securities in accordance with the funds stated objectives. Investors may purchase shares of an open-end fund through a broker-dealer, financial adviser, bank or other similar financial intermediary that may provideprovides investment advice to the investor, while investors may purchase shares of a closed-end fund on the stock exchange where the fund is traded. Financial intermediaries may earn fees and commissions and receive other compensation with respect to the fund shares managed or sold to investors.
The business and regulatory environments in which we operate globally remain complex, uncertain and subject to change. We are subject to various laws, rules and regulations globally that impose restrictions, limitations, and registration, reporting and disclosure requirements on our business, and add complexity to our global compliance operations.
We continue to focus on the long-term investment performance of our SIPs and on providing high quality customer service to our clients. The success of these and other strategiesOur business may be affected by the Risk Factors discussed below in Item 1A of Part I of this Annual Report,Form 10‑K, and other factors as discussed in this section.
COMPANY HISTORY AND ACQUISITIONS
TheSince 1947, the Company and its predecessors have been engaged in the investment management and related services business since 1947.business. Franklin was incorporated in the State of Delaware in November 1969, and originated our mutual fund business with the initial Franklin family of funds. The Franklin funds, are known for U.S. taxable and tax-freeits fixed income funds hybrid funds, and growth-growth and value-oriented equity funds. WeOver the years, we have expanded and developed our business to meet evolving investor needs, in part, by acquiring companies engaged in the investment management and/or related services business.
In October 1992, we acquired substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the investment management and related services businessservices.
As a result of Templeton, Galbraith & Hansberger Ltd. This acquisitionthese transactions, we have added, among others: (i) the Templeton family of funds, to our organization. The Templeton funds are known for theirits global investmentinvesting strategies and value style of investing.
In November 1996, we acquired certain assets and liabilities of Heine Securities Corporation, including Mutual Series Fund Inc., which now operates underinvesting, in 1992, (ii) the name Franklin Mutual Series. Franklin Mutual Series provides investment management services to various accounts and investment companies and isfamily of funds, known for its value-oriented equity funds.
In July 2000, we expanded our businessfunds, in South Korea when we acquired all of1996, (iii) the remaining outstanding shares of a South Korean investment management company, Templeton Investment Trust Management Co., Ltd., in which we previously held a partial interest, making us one of the largest independent foreign asset managers in South Korea at that time. The company has been renamed Franklin Templeton Investment Trust Management Co., Ltd.
In October 2000, we expanded our business in Canada when we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Bissett & Associates Investment Management Ltd., which now operates under the name Franklin Bissett Investment Management as partfamily of our Canadian subsidiary, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp. With this acquisition, we added Bissett’s family offunds, known for its Canadian taxable fixed income funds and growth-oriented equity investment funds, to our Canadian-based funds.
In April 2001, we acquired all ofin 2000, (iv) the outstanding shares of Fiduciary Trust Company International (“Fiduciary Trust”). Fiduciary Trust is currently a New York state-chartered limited purpose trust company that performsinvestment management, trust and fiduciary activities. Fiduciary Trust, together with its subsidiaries, also provides investment management and related services to, among others, high net-worth individuals and families, foundations and institutional clients.
In July 2002, we expanded our business in India when we acquired all of the outstanding shares of an Indian investment management company, Pioneer ITI AMC Limited, through our majority-owned subsidiary Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited (“FTAM India”). In April 2007, we completed the purchase of the remaining 25% interest in each of FTAM India, which provides asset management and investment advisory services, and Franklin Templeton Trustee Services Private Limited, a regulated trust company, each located in India.
In October 2003, we expanded our private equity investment management services, in 2001, (v) the Darby family of funds, known for its emerging markets when we acquired all ofinvesting strategies, in 2003, (vi) the remaining outstanding shares of Darby Overseas Investments, Ltd. and all of the remaining outstanding limited partnership interests of Darby Overseas Partners, L.P. (collectively, “Darby”), in which we previously held a partial interest. Darby, based in Washington, D.C., sponsors and manages funds for institutional investors and high net-worth individuals that invest primarily in emerging markets through private equity, private debt and infrastructure investment transactions, including regional and specialized sector funds.



4

Table of Contents

In July 2006, we expanded our business in Brazil when we completed the purchase of all of the remaining interests in a Brazilian investment management company, Bradesco Templeton Asset Management Ltda., in which we previously held a partial interest. The company has been renamed Franklin Templeton Investimentos (Brasil) Ltda. and provides investment management services.
In January 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of a specialty United Kingdom (“U.K.”) equity manager, Rensburg Fund Management Limited (“Rensburg”). Rensburg has been renamed Franklin Templeton Fund Management Limited and serves as a U.K.-based equity manager.
In July 2011, we expanded our business in Australia when we acquired all of the outstanding shares of a specialty Australian equity manager, Balanced Equity Management Pty. Limited, which provides investment management services.
In November 2012, we acquired approximately 69% of the equity of K2 Advisors Holdings LLC (“K2”), a fund of hedge funds solutions provider. We also agreed to acquire K2’s remaining equity interests over a multi-year period beginningprovider, in 2017.2012, (vii) the Edinburgh Partners global value investment manager based in the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”), in 2018, and (viii) the Benefit Street Partners U.S. alternative credit manager, in February 2019.
OUR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT BUSINESS
We are committed to providingbelieve in the value of active investment management, one of our core capabilities, to help investors navigate global markets, as well as in continuing to evolve and strategic advice.build on our strengths to meet the needs of our clients. Through our SIPs,investment products, we serve a variety of clients consisting of retail, institutional and high net-worth clientshigh-net-worth investors in regions and jurisdictions worldwide. We derive our revenues and net income from providing investment management and related services to our SIPsproducts and the sub-advised products that we service.products. Our investment management fees, which represent the majority of our revenues, depend to a large extent on the level and relative mix of our AUMassets under management (“AUM”) and the types of services provided. Sales and distribution fees, also a significant source of our revenues, consist of sales charges and commissions derived from sales and distribution of our SIPs.sponsored funds. These fees and arrangements change from time to time.
Our business is conducted through our subsidiaries, including those registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”), subsidiaries registered as investment adviser equivalents in jurisdictions including Australia, Brazil, Canada, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Singapore, South Korea, Commonwealth of The Bahamas, the United Arab Emirates, the U.K., and certain other subsidiaries.


4

Table of Contents

Our AUM by Investment Objective
We offer a broad product mix under our equity, hybrid,multi-asset/balanced, fixed income and cash management investment objectives and solutions.solutions to meet a variety of investment goals. Our fees for providing investment management services are generally based on a percentage of the market value of AUM in the accounts that we advise, the investment objectives of the accounts, and the types of services that we provide for the accounts. As of September 30, 20162019, AUM by investment objective on a worldwide basis was as follows:
Investment Objective Value in Billions Percentage of Total AUM 
Value in
Billions
 
Percentage
of Total
AUM
Equity        
Growth potential, income potential, value or various combinations thereof $303.7
 41% $270.5
 39%
Hybrid    
Multi-Asset/Balanced    
Asset allocation, balanced, flexible, alternative and income-mixed funds 137.4
 19% 134.3
 20%
Fixed Income        
Global/international, U.S. tax-free and U.S. taxable 286.1
 39% 278.3
 40%
Cash Management        
Short-term liquid assets 6.1
 1% 9.5
 1%
Total $733.3
 100% $692.6
 100%
Broadly speaking, the change in the net assets of our SIPsproducts depends primarily upon two factors: (1)(i) the increase or decrease in the market value of the securities and instruments held in the portfolio of investments;investments, and (2)(ii) the level of sales as compared to the level of redemptions. We are subject to the risk of asset volatility resulting from changes in the global capital markets. In addition, changing market conditions and the evolving needs of our clients may cause a shift in our asset mix, potentially resulting in an increase or decrease in our revenues and income depending upon the nature of our AUM and the level of management fees we earn based on our AUM. Despite such market risks, we believe that we have a competitive advantage as a result of the economic and geographic diversity of our SIPsproducts available to our clients.



5

Table of Contents

Summary ofOur Services and Capabilities
1.    Investment Management Services
We are committed to providing active investment management and strategic advice for our clients. Our subsidiaries offer our equity, fixed income and alternative strategies through various investment products, which include our registered open-end and closed-end funds, unregistered funds and separate accounts. We provide our investment management services pursuant to agreements in effect with each of our SIPsinvestment products and the products for which we provide sub-advisory services. Investment management fees are generally determined pursuant to such contractual arrangements, as a percentage of AUM. Our investment management services include services to managed accounts for which we have full investment discretion and to advisory accounts for which we have no investment discretion. Advisory accountsAccounts for which we have no investment discretion may or may not include the authority to trade for the account. Our services include fundamental investment research and valuation analyses, including original economic, political, industry and company research, and analyses of suppliers, customers and competitors. Our company research utilizes such sources as company public records and other publicly available information, management interviews, company prepared information, and company visits and inspections. Research services provided by brokerage firms are also used to support our findings. Our management fee on an account varies with the types of services that we provide for the account, among other things.
Our subsidiaries that provide discretionary investment management services for our SIPsproducts and sub-advised products either perform or obtain investment research, and determine which securities the SIPs or sub-advised products will purchase, hold or sell under the supervision and oversight of the funds’ boards of directors or trustees, as applicable. In addition, these subsidiaries may take all appropriate steps to implement such decisions, including arranging for the selection of broker-dealers and the execution and settlement of trades in accordance with applicable criteria set forth in the management agreements, for the SIPs, internal policies, and applicable law and practice. Our subsidiaries that provide non-discretionary investment management services perform investment research for our clients and make recommendations as to which securities the clients purchase, hold or sell, and may or may not perform trading activities for the products.


5

Table of Contents

Through our subsidiaries, we compensate the personnel who serve as officers of our funds or of the funds’ management companies, in addition to the personnel necessary to conduct the funds’ day-to-day business operations. The funds themselves do not have direct employees. Our subsidiaries either provide or arrange for the provision of: (i) office space, telephone, office equipment and supplies;supplies, (ii) trading desk facilities;facilities, (iii) authorization of expenditures and approval of bills for payment;payment, (iv) preparation of registration statements, proxy statements and annual and semi-annual reports to fund shareholders, notices of dividends, capital gains distributions and tax credits, and other regulatory reports;reports, (v) the daily pricing of fund investment portfolios, including collecting quotations from pricing services;services, (vi) accounting services, including preparing and supervising publication of daily net asset value quotations, periodic earnings reports and other financial data;data, (vii) services to ensure compliance with securities regulations, including recordkeeping requirements;requirements, (viii) preparation and filing of tax reports;reports, (ix) the maintenance of accounting systems and controls;controls, and (x) other administrative services. The funds generally pay their own expenses, such as external legal, insurance, custody and independent audit fees, regulatory registration fees, and other related expenses. The funds also share in board and shareholder meeting and reporting costs.
TheFor our U.S.-registered funds, the board of directors or trustees and our management personnel for our U.S. Funds regularly review the investment management fee structures for the funds in light of fund performance, the level and range of services provided, industry conditions and other relevant factors. Most of our investment management agreements between our subsidiaries and our U.S. Fundsfunds must be renewed each year (after an initial two-year term), and must be specifically approved at least annually by a vote of each fund’s board of directors or trustees as a whole and separately by a majority of its directors or trustees who are not interested persons of the fund under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”), or by a vote of the holders of a majority of the fund’s outstanding voting securities. Our U.S. agreements automatically terminate in the event of their “assignment,” as defined in the Investment Company Act. In addition, either party may terminate such an agreement without penalty after prior written notice. If agreements representing a significant portion of our AUM were terminated, it would have a material adverse impact on us.
Under the majority of our investment management agreements globally, the funds and accounts pay us a monthly fee in arrears based upon the fund’s average daily net assets.assets of the fund/account. Annual fee rates under our various agreements are often reduced as net assets exceed various threshold levels. Annual rates also vary by investment objective and type of services provided. Our agreements generally permit us to provide services to more than one fundfund/account and to other clients so long as our ability to render services to each of the fundsfund/account is not impaired, and so long as purchases and sales of portfolio securities for various advised fundsfunds/accounts are made on an equitable basis.
We use a “master/feeder” fund structure in certain situations. This structure allows an investment adviser to manage a single portfolio of securities at the “master fund” level and have multiple “feeder funds” that invest substantially all of their respective assets into the master fund. Individual and institutional shareholders generally invest in the “feeder funds,” which



6

Table of Contents

can offer a variety of tax, service and distribution options. A management fee may be charged either at the master fund level or the feeder fund level depending on the specific requirements of the fund, although funds also involving performance fees or carried interest will typically charge these together with management fees at the master fund level. Administrative, shareholder servicing and custodian fees are often waived at the feeder fund level and only charged at the master fund level, although the feeder funds will indirectly bear their pro-rata share of the expenses of the master fund as an investor in the master fund. Fees and expenses specific to a feeder fund may be charged at the level of that feeder fund.
Our services also include management of our strategicplatform of exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) in the U.S., Canada and the European Union (“EU”). Our ETF platform includes smart beta and actively managed ETFs.ETFs, as well as additional lower fee passive ETF products. ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at prices above or below the ETF’s net asset value.
Our Non-U.S. Funds,non-U.S.-registered funds, unregistered funds, institutional high net-worth and separately-managedhigh-net-worth separate accounts, and the products for which we provide sub-advisory services are typically subject to various termination rights and review andand/or renewal provisions. Investment management fees are generallyat times waived or voluntarily reduced when a new fund or fund/account is established, and then increased to contractual levels within an established timeline or as net asset values reach certain levels.
2.    Alternative Strategies Investment Management
We offer and support alternative investment strategies, products and solutions through various subsidiaries as alternatives to our traditional equity and fixed income products and related management services for our clients. Our alternative investment products include, among other capabilities, hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate funds and commodities funds. Examples of some of these offerings are listed below.
K2, a fund of hedge funds solutions provider, offers and supports alternative investments and multi-asset solutions platforms for institutional and other qualified investors. K2 provides risk management, manager selection and asset allocation capabilities in various global jurisdictions. Products offered include discretionary and non-discretionary custom-tailored investment programs, commingled funds of hedge funds and hedge fund investment advisory services. By active allocation to selected third-party sub-advisers, K2 also provides access to multiple non-traditional and alternative strategies as an adviser to a number of U.S. and Non-U.S. Funds.
Darby is primarily engaged in sponsoring and managing funds that invest in private equity, private debt and infrastructure investment transactions in emerging markets in Asia, Latin America and Central/Eastern Europe. Darby offers these investment funds through private placements to institutional and high net-worth individual investors.
Templeton Asset Management Ltd. sponsors and manages a limited number of investment funds that also invest primarily in emerging markets in Asia, Latin America and Central/Eastern Europe.
Franklin Templeton Institutional, LLC manages investment partnerships that invest in funds with exposure to global real estate opportunities.
Franklin Advisers, Inc. manages various privately offered funds with strategies that include the use of fixed income and other financial instruments as well as derivatives across the global interest rate, currency and credit markets.
3.    Institutional Investment Management
We provide a broad array of investment management services to institutional clients, which includeincluding corporations, endowments, charitable foundations, and pension and defined contribution plans. Our subsidiaries offer a wide range of equity, fixed income and alternative strategies through a variety of investment vehicles, including separate accounts, registered open-end and closed-end funds, and unregistered funds. We distribute and market globally our different capabilities under our brand names through various subsidiaries. In the U.S., we generally operate our institutional business under the trade name “Franklin Templeton Institutional.”
We primarily attract new institutional business through our relationships with pension, defined contribution and management consultants, direct sales efforts and additional mandates from our existing client relationships, as well as from our responses to requests for proposals. We also market and distribute our SIPsproducts through various subsidiaries to institutional investors with separately-managed accounts through various subsidiaries.separate accounts. A few of our subsidiaries also serve as direct marketing broker-dealers for institutional investors for certain of our institutional investmentprivate funds, and some of our private funds.funds may utilize third-party placement agents.





76

Table of Contents


3.    Alternative Strategies
Certain of our investment advisers manage alternative investment strategies. These strategies provide our clients with alternatives to traditional equity and fixed income products and services. Our alternative products include private credit funds and structured products (commingled, funds of one and separate accounts), business development companies, hedge funds (funds of funds, funds of one and custom advisory solutions), private equity funds, venture capital funds and real estate funds. These products employ various investment strategies and approaches, including loan origination, collateralized loan obligations, high-yield credit, hedge fund advisory, private equity and infrastructure transactions in emerging markets, global macro, financial technology, consumer loans, direct real estate investments, and custom-tailored investment programs.
4.    High Net-WorthHigh-Net-Worth Investment Management, Trust and Custody
Through our subsidiary Fiduciary Trust (includingCompany International (“Fiduciary Trust”), including its trust company and investment adviser subsidiaries),subsidiaries, we provide investment management and related services to, among others, high net-worthhigh-net-worth individuals and families, family offices, foundations and institutional clients. Similarly, through Fiduciary Trust Company of Canada (“FTCC”), we provide services and offer SIPs to high net-worth individuals and families and institutional clients in Canada. Fiduciary Trust offers investment management and advisory services across different investment styles and asset classes. The majority of Fiduciary Trust’s client assets are actively managed by individual portfolio managers, while a significant number of clients also seek multi-manager, multi-asset class solutions.
Through our various trust company subsidiaries, including Fiduciary Trust, we may also provide trust, custody and related services, including administration, performance measurement, estate planning and tax planning. WeIn addition, through our subsidiary Fiduciary Trust Company of Canada (“FTCC”), we provide planned giving administrationinvestment management, wealth planning, and related custodytrust and estate services, for non-profit organizations, including pooled income funds, charitable remainder trusts, charitable lead trusts and gift annuities, for which we may or may not act as trustee.offer products to high-net-worth individuals and families and institutional clients in Canada.
5.    Sales Distribution and MarketingDistribution
A significant portion of our revenues are generated from providingOur sales and distribution services. capabilities and related efforts are critical components of our business and may be impacted by global distribution trends and changes within the financial services industry. Sales and distribution fees primarily consist of upfront sales commissions and ongoing distribution fees. Sales commissions are earned from the sale of certain classes of sponsored funds at the time of purchase, and may be reduced or eliminated depending on the amount invested and the type of investor. Therefore, sales fees will change with the overall level of gross sales, the size of individual transactions, and the relative mix of sales between different share classes and types of investors.
Our registered open-endsponsored mutual funds and certain other products generally pay us distribution fees in return for sales, distributionmarketing and marketingdistribution efforts on their behalf. FundThe majority of U.S.-registered mutual funds, with the exception of certain money market funds, have adopted distribution plans under Rule 12b-1 (the “Rule 12b-1 Plans”) promulgated under the Investment Company Act. The Rule 12b-1 Plans permit the funds to pay us for marketing, marketing support, advertising, printing and sales promotion services relating to the distribution of their shares, are sold primarily through a large networksubject to the Rule 12b-1 Plans’ limitations on amounts based on daily average AUM. Similar arrangements exist for the distribution of independent financial intermediaries, including broker-dealers, financial advisers, banks and other third parties.non-U.S.-registered funds. We pay substantially all of our sales and distribution fees earned to the financial advisers and other intermediaries whothat sell our SIPs to the publicfunds on our behalf.
OurIn the U.S., our subsidiary Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc. (“FTDI”) acts as the principal underwriter and distributor of shares of most of our U.S.-registered open-end funds. Outside the U.S. Funds. Certain, certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries provide sales, distribution and marketing services to our Non-U.S. Funds distributed outside the U.S.non-U.S.-registered funds. Some of our Non-U.S. Funds,non-U.S.-registered funds, particularly the Luxembourg-domiciled Franklin Templeton Investment Funds Société d’Investissement à Capital Variable (“SICAV”), are distributed globally on a cross-border basis, while others are distributed exclusively in local markets. We earn sales and distribution fees primarily by distributing our funds pursuant to distribution agreements between FTDI, or our non-U.S. subsidiaries, and the funds. Under each distribution agreement with our open-end funds, we offer and sell the fund’s shares on a continuous basis and pay certain costs associated with selling, distributing and marketing the fund’s shares, including the costs of developing and producing sales literature, shareholder reports and prospectuses.
Our U.S. retirementThe distribution agreements with our U.S.-registered open-end funds generally provide for FTDI to pay commission expenses for sales of our fund shares to qualifying broker-dealers and other independent financial intermediaries. These financial intermediaries receive various sales commissions and other fees from FTDI for services in matching investors with funds whose investment objectives match such investors’ goals and risk profiles. Such intermediaries may also receive fees for their assistance in explaining the operations of the funds and in servicing and maintaining investors’ accounts, and for reporting and various other distribution services. We are heavily dependent upon these third-party distribution and sales channels and business relationships. There is conducted through divisionsincreasing competition for access to these channels, which has caused our distribution costs to rise and could cause further increases in the future as competition continues and service expectations


7

Table of Contents

increase.
The Rule 12b-1 Plans are established for one-year terms and must be approved annually by a vote of each fund’s board of directors or trustees as a whole and separately by a majority of its directors or trustees who are not interested persons of the fund under the Investment Company Act. All of these Rule 12b-1 Plans are subject to termination at any time by a majority vote of the disinterested fund directors or trustees or by the particular fund’s shareholders. Fees from the Rule 12b-1 Plans that FTDI that work closely with sponsors, consultants, record keepers and financial advisers of defined contribution plans, including 401(k) plans, variable annuity products and individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”). We offer our capabilitiesreceives as revenues are paid primarily to the U.S. retirement industry through a numberthird-party broker-dealers that sell our funds on our behalf.
Similar arrangements exist with the distribution of investment options, including sub-advised portfolios,our non-U.S.-registered funds education savings planswhere, generally, our subsidiary that distributes the funds receives maintenance fees from the funds and variable insurance funds.pays commissions and certain other fees to banks and other intermediaries.
In the U.S., most of our retail funds are distributed with a multi-class share structure. We adopted this share structure to providethat provides investors with more sales charge alternatives for their investments. Class A shares are sold with a front-end sales charge, to investors, except for when certain investment criteria or requirements are met. Class C shares have no front-end sales charges, although our distribution subsidiaries pay an up-frontupfront commission to financial intermediaries on these sales. Class C shares have a contingent deferred sales charge for redemptions within 12 months from the date of purchase. Although Class C shares are generally more costly to us in the year of sale, they allow us to be more competitive by providing a fixed percentage annual charge option. Class R and Class R6 shares, available in the U.S. as retirement share classes, also have no front-end sales charges. Class R shares are available to certain retirement and health savings plan accounts, and Class R6 shares are available to employer sponsoredcertain employer-sponsored retirement plans where plan level or omnibus accounts are held on the books of our transfer agent.and broker-dealer advisory programs. We no longer offer Class B shares to clients in the U.S.
In the U.S., we also offer Advisor Class shares in many of our Franklin and Templeton funds, and we offer Class Z shares in the Franklin Mutual Series funds, both of which have no sales charges. Advisor Class and Class Z shares are offered to certain qualified financial intermediaries, institutions, and high net-worthhigh-net-worth clients (both affiliated and unaffiliated), who have assets held in accounts managed by a subsidiary of Franklin, and are also available to our full-time employees, current and former officers, trustees and directors, and certain of their family members. We also offer money market funds to investors in the U.S. without a sales charge. Under the terms and conditions described in the prospectuses or the statements of additional information for some funds, certain investors can purchase shares at net asset value or at reduced sales charges. Our insurance



8

Table of Contents

product funds sold in the U.S. offer a multi-class share structure, and are offered at net asset value without a sales charge directly to insurance company separate accounts, certain qualified plans and other funds, including funds of funds.
Our U.S. retirement business is conducted through divisions of FTDI that work closely with sponsors, consultants, record keepers and financial advisers of defined contribution plans, including 401(k) plans, variable annuity products and individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”). We offer our capabilities to the U.S. retirement industry through a number of investment options, including sub-advised portfolios, funds, (funds of funds).education savings plans and variable insurance product funds.
Outside the U.S., we offer share classes similar to the Advisor Class shares to certain types of investors, although depending upon the fund and the country in which the fund is domiciled, the equivalent share class may be offered on a more restrictive or less restrictive basis than the similar U.S. Advisor Class shares. We also offer additional types of share classes and unit series outside the U.S. in response to local demand based on the needs of investors in particular markets, subject to applicable regulations which maythat change over time. In the majority of cases, investors in any class of shares may exchange their shares for a like class of shares in another one of our funds, subject to certain fees that may apply. Our Non-U.S. Fundsnon-U.S.-registered funds have sales charges and fee structures that vary by region.
The distribution agreements with our open-end U.S. Funds generally provide for FTDI to pay commission expenses for sales of our fund shares to qualifying broker-dealers and other independent financial intermediaries. These financial intermediaries receive various sales commissions and other fees from FTDI for services in matching investors with funds whose investment objectives match such investors’ goals and risk profiles. Such intermediaries may also receive fees for their assistance in explaining the operations of the funds and in servicing and maintaining investors’ accounts, and for reporting and various other distribution services. We are heavily dependent upon these third-party distribution and sales channels and business relationships. FTDI may also make payments to certain broker-dealers who provide marketing support services, as described further below. There is increasing competition for access to these channels, which has caused our distribution costs to rise and could cause further increases in the future as competition continues and service expectations increase. As of September 30, 2016, approximately 1,300 local, regional and national banks, securities firms and financial adviser firms offered shares of our open-end U.S. Funds for sale to the U.S. investing public, and approximately 2,900 banks, securities firms and financial adviser firms offered shares of our cross-border Non-U.S. Funds for sale outside of the U.S.
Most of our open-end U.S. Funds, with the exception of certain money market funds, have adopted distribution plans under Rule 12b-1 (the “Rule 12b-1 Plans”) promulgated under the Investment Company Act (“Rule 12b-1”). Under the Rule 12b-1 Plans, the funds pay FTDI for marketing, marketing support, advertising, printing and sales promotion services relating to the distribution of their shares, subject to the Rule 12b-1 Plans’ limitations based on average daily net AUM. In 2010, the SEC proposed changes to Rule 12b-1 which, if adopted, could limit our ability to recover expenses relating to the distribution of our funds.
The Rule 12b-1 Plans are established for one-year terms and must be approved annually by a vote of each fund’s board of directors or trustees as a whole and separately by a majority of its directors or trustees who are not interested persons of the fund under the Investment Company Act. All of these Rule 12b-1 Plans are subject to termination at any time by a majority vote of the disinterested fund directors or trustees or by the particular fund shareholders. Fees from the Rule 12b-1 Plans that FTDI receives as revenues are paid primarily to third-party broker-dealers who sell our funds to the public on our behalf. Similar arrangements exist with the distribution of our Non-U.S. Funds where, generally, our subsidiary that distributes the funds receives maintenance fees from the funds and pays commissions and certain other fees to banks and other intermediaries.
addition, FTDI and/or its affiliates may make the following additional payments to broker-dealers or other intermediaries that sell or arrange for the sale of shares of our funds:
Marketing support payments.U.S.-registered funds, including for marketing support. FTDI may make marketing support payments to certain broker-dealers whothat provide marketing support services and that are holders or dealers of record for accounts in one or more of our U.S.-registered open-end U.S. Funds.funds. A broker-dealer’s marketing support services may include business planning assistance, advertising, educating broker-dealer personnel about the funds and shareholder financial planning needs, placement on the broker-dealer’s list of offered funds, and access to sales meetings, sales representatives and management representatives of the broker-dealer. FTDI compensates broker-dealers differently depending upon, among other factors, sales and asset levels, and the level and/or type of marketing and educational activities provided by the broker-dealer. Such compensation may include financial assistance to broker-dealers that enables FTDI to participate in and/or present at conferences or seminars, sales or training programs for invited registered representatives and other employees, client and investor events and other broker-dealer-sponsored events. These payments may vary depending upon the nature of the event. FTDI periodically reviews its marketing support arrangements to determine whether to continue such payments. The statement of additional information for each retail U.S. Fund, provided to investors in such funds upon request, provides a list of broker-dealers that receive such marketing support payments and the maximum payments received. FTDI may also make marketing support payments to financial intermediaries that serve as plan service providers to certain employer sponsoredemployer-sponsored retirement plans in connection with activities intended to assist in the sale of our U.S.-registered open-end U.S. Fundsfunds to such plans. Certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries
FTDI also may also make marketing support or similar payments to intermediaries located outside the U.S. with respect to investments in Non-U.S. Funds.



9

Table of Contents

Transaction support and other payments. FTDI may pay ticket charges per purchase or exchange order placed by a broker-dealer or one-time payments for other ancillary services, such as setting up funds on a broker-dealer’s fund trading system. From time to time, FTDI, at its expense,Our non-U.S. subsidiaries also may make additionalsimilar marketing support and other payments to broker-dealers that sellthird-party intermediaries located outside the U.S. with respect to investments in, or arrange for the sale of sharesdistribution of, our U.S. Funds. FTDI routinely sponsors due diligence meetings for registered representatives during which they receive updates on various funds and are afforded the opportunity to speak with portfolio managers. Invitation to these meetings is not conditioned on selling a specific numbernon-U.S.-registered funds.


8

Table of shares. Those who have shown an interest in our funds, however, are more likely to be considered. To the extent permitted by their firm’s policies and procedures, registered representatives’ expenses in attending these meetings may be covered by FTDI. Similar payments may be made by our non-U.S. subsidiaries that distribute our Non-U.S. Funds to third-party distributors of such funds.Contents

Other compensation may be offered to the extent not prohibited by federal or state laws or any self-regulatory agency, such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). FTDI makes payments for events it deems appropriate, subject to FTDI’s guidelines and applicable law.
6.    Shareholder Servicing
We receiveSubstantially all shareholder servicing fees as compensationare earned from our sponsored funds for providing transfer agency services, which include providing customershareholder statements, transaction processing, customer service and tax reporting. Fees for U.S. funds are based on the level of AUM and the number of transactions in shareholder accounts, while outside of the U.S., the fees are based on the level of AUM and/or the number of shareholder accounts.
Our subsidiary Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC (“FTIS”) serves as the shareholder servicing and dividend-paying agent for our U.S.-registered open-end U.S. Funds.funds. FTIS is registered with the SEC as a transfer agent under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). FTIS is compensated pursuant to transfer agency service agreements with the funds. These fees are generally fixed annual charges per shareholder account that vary with the particular type of fund and the services being rendered. FTIS also is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses. Other non-U.S. subsidiaries provide similar services to our Non-U.S. Funds, and may be compensated based on a combination of similar per account fees and fees based on the level of AUM in the accounts that we serve.
FTIS may also pay servicing fees to third-party intermediaries primarily to help offset costs associated with client account maintenance support, statement preparation and transaction processing. Such third parties: (i)parties maintain omnibus accounts with the fundfunds in the institution’s name on behalf of numerous beneficial owners of fund shares;shares, or (ii) provide support for fund shareholder accounts by sharing account data with FTIS through the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation systems. The funds reimburse FTIS for these third-party payments.payments, subject to certain limitations, as well as other out-of-pocket expenses.
Summary of SIPsOur Investment Products and Capabilities
1.    Investment Objectives OverviewRange of Products
We offer active, passive and smart beta strategies and a broad range of products under our equity, multi-asset/balanced, fixed income and cash management investment objectives and solutions. Our SIPsinvestment products are offered globally to retail, institutional and high net-worth clients,high-net-worth investors, which include individual investors, qualified groups, trustees, tax-deferred plans (such as IRAs in the U.S. and registered retirement saving plans, or RSPs,RRSPs, in Canada) or money purchase plans, employee benefit and profit sharing plans, trust companies, bank trust departments and institutional investors. Our SIPsproducts include portfolios managed for some of the world’s largest corporations, endowments, charitable foundations, pension funds and pensionsovereign wealth funds, as well as wealthy individuals and other institutions. We use various investment techniques to focus on specific client objectives for these specialized portfolios.
The SIPsproducts and capabilities that we offer accommodate a variety of investment goals, spanning the spectrum of our clients’ risk tolerance - from capital appreciation (with our more growth-oriented products) to capital preservation (with our fixed income offerings). In seeking to achieve such objectives, each portfolio emphasizes different strategies and invests in different types of instruments.
Our equity investment products include some that are considered value-oriented, others that are considered growth-oriented, and some that use a combination of growth and value characteristics, generally identified as blend or core products. Value investing focuses on identifying companies that our research analysts and portfolio managers believe are undervalued based on a number of different factors, usually put in the context of historical ratios such as price-to-earnings or price-to-book value; however, we also consider the future earnings potential of each individual company on a multi-year basis. Growth investing focuses on identifying companies that our research analysts and portfolio managers believe have sustainable growth characteristics, meeting our criteria for sustainable growth potential, quality and valuation. In this effort, the key variables we examine include: (i) market opportunity (overall size and growth);, (ii) competitive positioning of the company;company, (iii) assessment of management (strength, breadth, depth, and integrity) and execution of plans;plans, and (iv) the general financial strength and profitability of the enterprise, to determine whether the growth and quality aspects are properly reflected in the current share price. Paramount



10

Table of Contents

to all of our different equity products is the incorporation of independent, fundamental research through our own collaborative in-house group of investment professionals. Our approach across the variety of equity products we manage emphasizes bottom-up stock selection within a disciplined portfolio construction process, and is complemented by our ongoing assessment of risk at both the security and portfolio levels.
Portfolios seeking income generally focus on one or more of the following securities: (i) taxable and tax-exempt money market instruments;instruments, (ii) tax-exempt municipal bonds;bonds, (iii) global or regional fixed income securities;securities, and (iv) fixed income debt securities of corporations, of the U.S. government and its sponsored agencies and instrumentalities, (such as the Government National Mortgage Association, the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) or of the various states in the U.S. Others focus on investments in particular countries and regions.


9

Table of Contents

In addition, our alternative investment strategies provide our clients with alternatives to traditional equity and fixed income products and services.
2.    Types of SIPsAUM by Product Type
As of September 30, 20162019, our total AUM was $733.3692.6 billion and the types of SIPsinvestment products we offered were as follows:
U.S. Funds - Our U.S. funds (including U.S.-registered open-end and closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds and our insurance products trust), in the aggregate, accounted for $379.8 billion of AUM. Our five largest U.S. funds represented, in the aggregate, 23% of total AUM.
Cross-Border Funds - Our cross-border products, which are comprised of a variety of funds principally domiciled in Luxembourg and registered for sale to non-U.S. investors in certain other countries, in the aggregate, accounted for $93.7 billion of AUM. Our five largest cross-border funds represented, in the aggregate, 7% of total AUM.
Local/Regional Funds - In addition to our cross-border products, in some countries we offer products for the particular local market. These local/regional funds, in the aggregate, accounted for $44.8 billion of AUM.
Other Accounts, Alternative Investment Products and Trusts - Our other accounts, alternative investment products and trusts, in the aggregate, accounted for $174.3 billion of AUM.

U.S. Funds - Our U.S. Funds (including open-end and closed-end funds and our insurance products trust) accounted for $419.1 billion of AUM. Our five largest U.S. Funds and their AUM were: FCF-Franklin Income Fund ($79.7 billion), TIT-Templeton Global Bond Fund ($42.1 billion), FMSF-Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund ($22.0 billion), FMT-Franklin Rising Dividends Fund ($17.6 billion) and Franklin California Tax-Free Fixed Income Fund ($15.2 billion). These five funds represented, in the aggregate, 24% of total AUM.

Cross-Border Funds - Our cross-border products, which are comprised of a variety of investment funds principally domiciled in Luxembourg and registered for sale to non-U.S. investors in 39 countries, accounted for $107.2 billion of AUM. Our five largest cross-border funds and their AUM were: FTIF-Templeton Global Bond Fund ($20.1 billion), FTIF-Templeton Global Total Return Fund ($19.5 billion), FTIF-Templeton Growth (Euro) Fund ($7.7 billion), FTIF-Templeton Asian Growth Fund ($4.8 billion) and FTIF-Templeton Emerging Markets Bond Fund ($4.0 billion). These five funds represented, in the aggregate, 8% of total AUM.
Local/Regional Funds - In addition to our cross-border products, in some countries we offer products for the particular local market. These local/regional funds accounted for $41.8 billion of AUM.
Other Managed Accounts, Alternative Investment Products and Trusts - Our managed accounts, alternative investment products and trusts accounted for $165.2 billion of AUM, of which $10.3 billion were K2 investment products and funds, and $6.4 billion included Darby products and real estate, emerging markets and certain global fixed income investment funds.



1110

Table of Contents


3.    AUM by Investment Objective and Types of SIPsProduct Type
The following table shows our AUM by investment objective and types of SIPsinvestment products as of September 30, 20162019:
(in billions)

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
 
U.S.
Funds
 
Cross-Border
Funds
 
Local/Regional
Funds
 
Other Managed Accounts,
Alternative Investment
Products and Trusts
 Total
(in billions)

Investment Objective
 
U.S.
Funds
 
Cross-Border
Funds
 
Local/Regional
Funds
 
Other Accounts,
Alternative Investment
Products and Trusts
 Total
Equity                    
Asia-Pacific $0.8
 $10.7
 $6.4
 $19.2
 $37.1
 $1.0
 $6.7
 $7.6
 $11.2
 $26.5
Canada 
 
 4.0
 5.2
 9.2
 
 
 3.3
 3.6
 6.9
Europe, the Middle East and Africa 2.5
 4.2
 5.7
 0.3
 12.7
Europe, Middle East and Africa 1.6
 2.0
 3.3
 2.1
 9.0
U.S. 89.1
 8.3
 1.7
 4.2
 103.3
 97.4
 9.6
 1.6
 3.5
 112.1
Emerging markets1
 3.3
 4.3
 2.9
 4.1
 14.6
 3.3
 4.2
 5.9
 3.2
 16.6
Global/international2
 62.3
 12.3
 4.2
 48.0
 126.8
 44.8
 10.9
 3.7
 40.0
 99.4
Total equity 158.0
 39.8
 24.9
 81.0
 303.7
 148.1
 33.4
 25.4
 63.6
 270.5
Hybrid          
Multi-Asset/Balanced          
Asia-Pacific 
 
 0.4
 4.0
 4.4
 
 
 0.4
 0.2
 0.6
Canada 
 
 0.7
 0.9
 1.6
 
 
 0.6
 0.6
 1.2
Europe, the Middle East and Africa 
 2.2
 
 0.4
 2.6
U.S. 94.4
 2.4
 0.1
 22.1
 119.0
 91.3
 2.4
 0.2
 20.0
 113.9
Global/international2
 3.3
 3.6
 1.4
 1.5
 9.8
 3.0
 6.7
 0.6
 8.3
 18.6
Total hybrid 97.7
 8.2
 2.6
 28.9
 137.4
Total multi-asset/balanced 94.3
 9.1
 1.8
 29.1
 134.3
Fixed Income                    
Asia-Pacific 
 0.8
 4.9
 0.6
 6.3
 
 0.4
 8.5
 0.5
 9.4
Canada 
 
 2.9
 2.2
 5.1
 
 
 3.3
 0.5
 3.8
Europe, the Middle East and Africa 
 1.9
 
 1.1
 3.0
Europe, Middle East and Africa 
 2.0
 0.2
 0.9
 3.1
U.S. tax-free 71.8
 
 0.2
 4.5
 76.5
 62.0
 
 0.2
 4.1
 66.3
U.S. taxable 34.0
 9.8
 2.4
 7.2
 53.4
 27.1
 4.3
 1.0
 35.0
 67.4
Emerging markets1
 1.1
 5.4
 0.1
 10.9
 17.5
 0.9
 11.9
 0.8
 15.8
 29.4
Global/international2
 51.6
 40.8
 3.1
 28.8
 124.3
 40.1
 32.0
 2.0
 24.8
 98.9
Total fixed income 158.5
 58.7
 13.6
 55.3
 286.1
 130.1
 50.6
 16.0
 81.6
 278.3
Cash Management 4.9
 0.5
 0.7
 
 6.1
 7.3
 0.6
 1.6
 
 9.5
Total $419.1
 $107.2
 $41.8
 $165.2
 $733.3
 $379.8
 $93.7
 $44.8
 $174.3
 $692.6
__________________ 
1 
Emerging markets include developing countries worldwide.
2 
Global/international includes entities doing business eitherproducts that invest worldwide (including the U.S.) or only outside of the U.S.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Certain financial information about the Companys business segment and geographic areas is contained in Note 14 – Segment and Geographic Information in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
We are subject to extensive regulation. Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various federal, state, and international regulation and supervision that continue to change and evolve over time. Consequently, there is uncertainty associated with the regulatory environments in which we operate.



12

Table of Contents

U.S. Regulation
We are subject to federal and state laws that include U.S. federal securities laws, state securities and corporate laws, and the rules and regulations promulgated by certain regulatory and self-regulatory organizations such as the SEC and the NYSE. As a U.S. reporting company, we are subject to various securities, compliance, corporate governance and disclosure rules adopted by the SEC. We are also subject to various other federal and state laws, including those affecting corporate governance and disclosure, such as the U.S Securities Act of 1933, the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), and the USA Patriot Act of 2001. As a NYSE-listed company, we are also subject to the NYSE listing standards.
As a global investment management organization, certain of our subsidiaries are also subject to the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, FINRA, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), the National Futures Association, the U.S. Department of Treasury and the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”), and to various securities, compliance, corporate governance, disclosure, privacy, anti-money laundering, anti-terrorist financing, and economic, trade and sanctions laws and regulations, both domestically and internationally. Given our global operations, we are also subject to securities laws and other laws of various non-U.S. jurisdictions and to regulation by non-U.S. regulators. In some cases, our non-U.S. operations may also be subject to regulation by U.S. regulators, such as the Department of Justice, the CFTC and the SEC (for example with respect to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977). We are also subject not only to the sanctions programs administered by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, but also to sanctions programs adopted and administered by non-U.S. jurisdictions where our investment management services and products are offered. Further, we are also subject to the laws and regulations of states and other jurisdictions regarding the reporting and escheatment of unclaimed or abandoned property.
Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the SEC under the Advisers Act, the CFTC and/or licensed by various non-U.S. regulators. In addition, many of our funds are registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act or other non-U.S. laws. These registrations, licenses and authorizations impose numerous obligations, as well as detailed operational requirements, on such subsidiaries and such funds. The Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on our registered investment adviser subsidiaries, including record keeping, operating and marketing requirements, disclosure obligations and prohibitions on fraudulent activities. The Investment Company Act imposes similar obligations on the registered investment companies advised by our subsidiaries. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act, ranging from fines and censure to termination of an investment adviser’s registration. Our subsidiaries must also comply with complex tax regimes.
FINRA Conduct Rules limit the amount of aggregate sales charges that may be paid in connection with the purchase and holding of investment company shares sold through broker-dealers. The effect of the rule is to limit the amount of fees that could be paid pursuant to a fund’s Rule 12b-1 Plan to FTDI, our principal sales and distribution subsidiary in the U.S., which earns distribution fees on the distribution of fund shares in the U.S. In 2010, the SEC proposed changes to Rule 12b-1 which, if adopted, could limit our ability to recover expenses relating to the distribution of our funds.
In April 2016, the DOL issued a new fiduciary rule that will subject financial professionals who provide investment advice to certain U.S. retirement clients to a new fiduciary duty intended to address conflicts of interests. We believe that the rule could significantly impact the ability of financial professionals to provide investment advice and recommendations for retirement accounts about funds for which they receive a fee from the fund or its affiliates. This rule may impact the compensation paid to the financial intermediaries who sell our funds to their retirement clients and may negatively impact our business. Implementation of the rule will be phased in beginning in April 2017, and will generally become fully effective in January 2018.
The Dodd-Frank Act authorized the establishment of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), the mandate of which is to identify and respond to threats to U.S. financial stability. Similarly, the U.S. and other members of the G-20 group of nations have empowered the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) to identify and respond, in a coordinated manner, to threats to global financial stability. The FSOC may designate certain non-bank financial companies as systemically important financial institutions (“SIFIs”), which are subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The FSB may designate certain non-bank financial companies as global systemically important financial institutions (“G-SIFIs”); the additional regulatory requirements triggered by any such designation are not yet established. The FSOC and the FSB, as well as other global regulators, are considering what threats to U.S. and global financial stability, if any, arise from asset management companies and/or the funds that they manage, and whether such threats can be mitigated by treating such entities as SIFIs or G-SIFIs and/or subjecting them to additional regulation. To the extent that we or any of



13

Table of Contents

our funds are designated as a SIFI or G-SIFI, such regulation, which could include requirements related to risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity, credit exposure, stress testing, resolution plans, early remediation, and certain risk management requirements, could impact our business.
The Dodd-Frank Act, as well as other legislative and regulatory changes, impose other restrictions and limitations on us, resulting in increased scrutiny and oversight of our financial services and products. We continue to analyze the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act as further implementing rules are adopted and become effective. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, which imposes a number of new regulations governing derivative transactions, certain categories of swaps are currently required, and further categories of swaps are likely to be required, to be submitted for clearing by a regulated clearing organization and reported on a swap execution facility, and the posting of collateral will be required for uncleared swaps. These and other requirements are likely to impact how we manage our investment strategies because of, among other things, an increase in the costs and expenses of utilizing swaps and other derivatives. In addition to the rulemaking mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, rules adopted by the CFTC haveremoved or limited previously available exemptions and exclusions from registration and regulation as a commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor on which we had relied, resulting in the imposition of either additional registration, disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping requirements or more stringent requirements to comply with the remaining exemptions or exclusions for operators of certain of our registered investment funds and other pooled vehicles that use or trade in futures, swaps and other derivatives considered commodity interests and subject to regulation by the CFTC. In addition, the SEC has adopted rules that have changed the structure and operation for certain types of money market funds, and has also proposed other rules that (i) would require certain U.S. Funds to adopt liquidity management programs, and (ii) would impose restrictions on the use of derivatives by registered funds. We expect that the complex regulatory requirements and developments applicable to us will cause us to incur additional administrative and compliance costs.
Non-U.S. Regulation
Our operations outside the U.S. are subject to the laws and regulations of various non-U.S. jurisdictions and non-U.S. regulatory agencies and bodies. As we continue to expand our international presence, a number of our subsidiaries and international operations have become subject to regulatory systems, in various jurisdictions, comparable to those covering our operations in the U.S. Regulators in these non-U.S. jurisdictions may have broad authority with respect to the regulation of financial services including, among other things, the authority to grant or cancel required licenses or registrations. In addition, these regulators may subject certain of our subsidiaries to net capital and other financial or operational requirements.
In the U.K., the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) and the Prudential Regulation Authorities (the “PRA”) currently regulate certain of our subsidiaries. Authorization by the FCA and the PRA is required to conduct any financial services related business in the U.K. pursuant to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The FCA’s and PRAs rules under that act govern a firm’s capital resources requirements, senior management arrangements, conduct of business, interaction with clients, and systems and controls. Breaches of these rules could result in a wide range of disciplinary actions against our U.K.-regulated subsidiaries.
In Luxembourg, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (“CSSF”) currently regulates our substantial activities in Luxembourg, including our subsidiary Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l. (“FTIS Lux”). FTIS Lux is licensed as a management company for both the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (“UCITS”) and alternative investment funds (“AIFs”) and, as such, it manages our Luxembourg-domiciled UCITS and our European Union (“EU”)-domiciled AIFs. The CSSF’s rules include capital resource, governance and risk management requirements, conduct of business rules and oversight of systems and controls. Breaches of these rules could result in a wide range of disciplinary actions against FTIS Lux.
In addition to the above, our U.K.-regulated subsidiaries and certain other European subsidiaries and branches, must comply with the pan-European regime established by the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”), which regulates the provision of investment services and conduct of investment activities throughout the European Economic Area (“EEA”). MiFID sets out detailed requirements governing the organization and conduct of business of investment firms and regulated markets. It also includes pre- and post-trade transparency requirements for equity markets and extensive transaction reporting requirements. The U.K. has adopted the MiFID rules into national legislation via the FCA rules, as have those other EU member states in which we have a presence.
A review of MiFID by the European Commission (the “Commission”) has led to the creation of a replacement directive and a new regulation (together “MiFID II”) to become effective in January 2018 and which extends the scope of the original MiFID in response to issues raised by the financial crisis. Changes will be made to pre- and post-trade reporting obligations



14

Table of Contents

and there will be an expansion of the types of instruments subject to these requirements, such as bonds, structured products and derivatives. A new concept of trading venue has been created and algorithmic trading will be subject to specific regulations. There will also be changes to conduct of business requirements, including selling practices, intermediary inducements and client categorization, as well as the provision of investment advice and management within the EU by non-EU advisers, including ours. Powers will also be given to EU national regulators to ban certain products and services and to the European Securities and Markets Authority to temporarily restrict certain financial activities within the EU.
One of the most significant developments in MiFID II is the ban on commission and other payments (“inducements”) to independent advisers and discretionary managers, which will result in a major change in the commercial relationships between fund providers and distributors. Arrangements with non-independent advisers will also be affected as narrower rules around the requirement that any commission reflects an enhancement of the service to customers come into effect, along with a prescriptive list of permissible non-monetary benefits. The final interpretation of the inducements rules could also result in major changes to how fund managers pay for investment research, though this is subject to further consultation and interpretation at the level of national authorities. This could result in a reduction in the range and quality of available research, increased costs for fund managers, and a need for revised commercial terms with both brokers and clients to reflect these changes.
During 2016, rules implementing the central clearing obligation in relation to specified derivatives under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation came into effect for the very largest trading counterparties, with the clearing obligation for other large derivatives users (including some of our clients) coming into force in December 2016. A proposal is under consultation to delay later phases of implementation, for the smallest counterparties, for a further two years. Importantly, significant progress was made in achieving mutual recognition of central counterparties between the U.S. and EU regulatory authorities. In addition, rules relating to margin requirements for uncleared over-the-counter derivatives will shortly be finalized, expected to take effect from January or February 2017 for the largest trading counterparties and from March 2017 for all other counterparties, including our clients. Given the international scale of our trading activity, if regulatory coordination is not successful, the various regulatory regimes to which we are subject could potentially result in duplication of administration and increased transaction costs, but the U.S./EU accord will cover the majority of our relevant trading for central clearing purposes.
The EU’s Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”) came into effect in July 2014 and most EU member states have implemented its provisions on a national level. AIFMD regulates managers of, and service providers to, AIFs that are domiciled and offered in the EU and that are not authorized as retail funds under UCITS. The AIFMD also regulates the marketing within the EU of all AIFs, including those domiciled outside the EU. In general, AIFMD has a staged implementation up to 2018. Compliance with the AIFMD’s requirements may restrict AIF marketing and imposes compliance obligations in the form of remuneration policies, capital requirements, reporting requirements, leverage oversight, valuation, stakes in EU companies, the domicile, duties and liability of custodians and liquidity management.
The EU’s Market Abuse Regulation (“MAR”) came into effect in July 2016 with a primary aim to increase market integrity and investor protection, enhancing the attractiveness of securities markets for raising capital. Under MAR, EU market abuse rules will become extra-territorial as long as the instrument has a listing on an EEA regulated market.
The most recent iteration of the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (“UCITS V”) became effective in March 2016. The main objectives of UCITS V are to expand the responsibilities and potential liabilities of depositaries, to regulate remuneration policies, and to harmonize the sanctions available to regulatory authorities.
Proposals on packaged retail investment and insurance products (“PRIIPs”) are to be implemented through the strengthening of MiFID standards for non-insurance PRIIPs, revisions to the Insurance Mediation Directive’s selling standard for all insurance-based PRIIPs and new investor disclosure requirements for all PRIIPs through the PRIIPs Key Information Document (“KID”) regulation, which was approved by the European Parliament in April 2014. It requires PRIIP manufacturers to draw up a KID which can be no longer than three pages in length and must be written in simple language. The regulation allows UCITS providers, who are already required to produce the UCITS Key Investor Information Document, a transitional period of five years from enactment during which they will be exempt from its terms. In September 2016, the European Parliament rejected the Commission’s proposal for key Level 2 Regulatory Technical Standards governing the detailed implementation of PRIIPs, which may result in a delay to the PRIIPs effective date scheduled for December 2016.
In addition, the Commissions proposal for a financial transaction tax (“FTT”) in the EU, which would, if approved by all EU member states, apply to all financial transactions where at least one party is established in an EU member state and either that party or another party to the transaction is a financial institution was a controversial topic for all the EU member



15

Table of Contents

states to agree upon and after discussions failed to establish unanimous support. Subsequently the Commission has put forward a revised proposal to implement the tax in the eleven EU member states which wished to participate. While the specific terms of the revised FTT proposal remain subject to negotiation, any tax on securities transactions could likely have a negative impact on the liquidity of the derivatives and securities markets in Europe and could adversely impact our European clients’ assets and our non-European clients to the extent that they are or want to be invested in European assets.
Further, pursuant to ongoing efforts to encourage global tax compliance, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development has adopted a global common reporting standard for the automatic exchange of financial information among participating countries (“CRS”), aimed at ensuring that persons with financial assets located outside of their tax residence country pay required taxes. In many cases, intergovernmental agreements between the participating countries will govern implementation of the new rules. CRS will be implemented over a multi-year period and we will continue to monitor the implementing regulations and corresponding intergovernmental agreements to determine our requirements. CRS may subject us to additional reporting, compliance and administrative costs and burdens in jurisdictions where we operate as a qualifying financial institution.
In June 2016, a narrow majority of voters in a U.K. referendum voted to exit the EU (“Brexit”), but it is still unclear exactly what will be the U.K.’s status in relation to the EU when it ultimately leaves (and the negotiation process does not begin until the U.K. formally notifies the EU of its intent pursuant to Article 50 of the EU treaty, which has not yet occurred). While these are unprecedented times for the U.K., and we are monitoring the consequences very closely for our clients from an investment perspective, we believe that Brexit will not have a major impact on the way our firm operates in the U.K. Our long-standing U.K. businesses are expected to continue to provide their services to U.K. customers. Furthermore, we have other regulated subsidiaries across continental Europe such that, in the event of a future restriction on cross-border trade in financial products and services between the U.K. and the new EU, it would be likely to have a limited effect on our business. Moreover, our cross-border SICAV investment fund range, which is the mostly widely-distributed such range in the world, is based in Luxembourg. We have a separate, U.K.-domiciled fund range that is, and will continue to be, distributed only in the U.K.
In Canada, our subsidiaries are subject to provincial and territorial laws and are registered with and regulated by provincial and territorial securities regulatory authorities. The mandate of Canadian securities regulatory authorities is generally to protect investors and to foster fair and efficient capital markets. Securities regulatory authorities impose certain requirements on registrants, including a standard of conduct, capital and insurance, record keeping, regulatory financial reporting, conflict of interest management, compliance systems and security holder reporting. Failure to comply with applicable securities laws, regulations and rules could result in, among other things, reprimands, suspension of or restrictions on an individuals or firms registration, prohibitions from becoming or acting as a registrant, administrative penalties or disgorgement. In addition, as a federally licensed trust company, FTCC is subject to regulation and supervision by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada and another subsidiary, FTC Investor Services Inc., is a member of and regulated by the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada. These regulatory bodies have similar requirements to those of the securities regulatory authorities with a view to ensuring the capital adequacy and sound business practices of the subsidiaries and the appropriate treatment of their clients.
In March 2013, the Canadian Securities Administrators, the umbrella organization of provincial and territorial securities regulatory authorities, released final amendments to its rules regarding registrant obligations that require additional disclosure by registrants to their clients, including enhanced disclosure at account opening of all operating charges and fees a client may be required to pay, pre-trade disclosure of any charges a client may be required to pay, enhanced reporting on client statements that includes charges paid by the client and all compensation received by registrants in respect of a clients account and new reporting regarding the performance of investments held in the account. These new rules, which were phased in over a three-year period, have required us to make changes to our systems to comply with these new disclosure and reporting standards.
In Singapore, our subsidiaries are subject to, among others, the Securities and Futures Act (“SFA”), the Financial Advisers Act (“FAA”) and the subsidiary legislation promulgated pursuant to these Acts, which are administered by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”). Our asset management subsidiary and its employees conducting regulated activities specified in the SFA and/or the FAA are required to be licensed with the MAS. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, codes, directives, notices and guidelines issued by the MAS may result in penalties including fines, censures and the suspension or revocation of licenses granted by the MAS.
In Australia, our subsidiaries are subject to various Australian federal and state laws and are regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”). ASIC regulates companies, financial markets and financial services in



16

Table of Contents

Australia. ASIC imposes certain conditions on licensed financial services organizations that apply to our subsidiaries, including requirements relating to capital resources, operational capability and controls. Failure to comply with applicable law, regulations or conditions could result in various sanctions being imposed including cancellation, suspension or variation of the licenses held by our Australian subsidiaries.
In Hong Kong, our subsidiary is subject to the Securities and Futures Ordinance (the “SFO”) and its subsidiary legislation, which governs the securities and futures markets and regulates, among others, offers of investments to the public and provides for the licensing of dealing in securities and asset management activities and intermediaries. This legislation is administered by the Securities and Futures Commission (the “SFC”). The SFC is also empowered under the SFO to establish standards for compliance as well as codes and guidelines. Our subsidiary and its employees conducting any of the regulated activities specified in the SFO are required to be licensed with the SFC, and are subject to the rules, codes and guidelines issued by the SFC from time to time. Failure to comply with the applicable laws, regulations, codes and guidelines could result in various sanctions being imposed, including fines, reprimands and the suspension or revocation of the licenses granted by the SFC.
In India, certain of our subsidiaries are primarily subject to relevant regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”). The Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”), the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) and the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (“FIPB”) are the other major regulatory authorities that are capable of issuing directions of a binding nature to our subsidiaries. A failure to comply with the applicable laws, regulations, codes, notices, directives, guidelines, orders, circulars and schemes issued by SEBI, RBI, MCA or FIPB may result in penalties including fines, censures and/or suspension or revocation of licenses, approvals or registration status.
In Japan, our subsidiaries are subject to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (the “FIEL”) and the Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations. These laws are administered and enforced by the Japanese Financial Services Agency (the “JFSA”), which establishes standards for compliance, including capital adequacy and financial soundness requirements, customer protection requirements and conduct of business rules. The JFSA is empowered to conduct administrative proceedings that can result in censure, fine, the issuance of cease and desist orders or the suspension or revocation of registrations and licenses granted under the FIEL.
There are similar legal and regulatory arrangements in effect in many other non-U.S. jurisdictions where our subsidiaries, branches and representative offices, as well as certain joint ventures or companies in which we own minority stakes, are authorized to conduct business. We are also subject to regulation and supervision by, among others, the Securities Commission of The Bahamas; the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários in Brazil; the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority; the China Securities Regulatory Commission in the People’s Republic of China; the Autorité des Marchés Financiers in France; the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority in Germany; the Central Bank of Ireland; the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa in Italy; the Financial Services Commission and the Financial Supervisory Service in South Korea; the Securities Commission in Malaysia; the Comision Nacional Bancaria y de Valores in Mexico; the Autoriteit Financiële Markten in the Netherlands; the Polish Securities and Exchange Commission; the Romanian Financial Services Authority; the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores in Spain; the Finansinspektionen in Sweden; the Swiss Federal Banking Commission; the Financial Supervisory Commission in the Republic of China; the Dubai Financial Services Authority in the United Arab Emirates; and the State Securities Commission of Vietnam.
COMPETITION
The financial services industry is a highly competitive global industry. According to data sourced from the Investment Company Institute as of June 30, 2016, there were approximately 11,200 registered open-end funds whose shares were offered to the public in the U.S.Competition is based on various factors, including, among others, business reputation, investment performance, product mix and approximately 107,900 registered open-end funds whose shares were offered to the public outside the U.S., in each case including mutual funds, ETFsofferings, service quality and funds of funds.
innovation, distribution relationships, and fees charged. We face strong competition from numerous investment management companies, securities brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, banks and other financial institutions, which offer a wide range of financial and investment management services and products to the same retail, institutional accounts, separate accounts, retailand high-net-worth investors and high net-worth clientsaccounts that we are seeking to attract. Competition is based on various factors, including, among others, business reputation, investment performance,We offer a broad product mix that meets a variety of investment goals and offerings, service qualityneeds for different investors, and innovation, distribution relationships, and fees charged.we may periodically introduce new products to provide investors with additional investment options.


11

Table of Contents

Due to our international presence and varied product mix, it is difficult to assess our market position relative to other investment managers on a worldwide basis, but we believe that we are one of the more widely diversified asset managers based in the U.S. We believe that our equity and fixed income asset mix coupled with our global presence will serve our competitive needs well over the long term. We continue to focus on the long-term performance of our investment products,



17

Table of Contents

service to clients and extensive marketing activities through our strong broker-dealer and other financial institution distribution network as well as with high net-worthhigh-net-worth and institutional clients. We believe that performance, diversity of products and customer service, along with fees and costs, are the primary drivers of competition in the financial services industry.
The periodic establishment of new investment management firms and investment products increases the competition that we face. Many of our competitors have long-standing and established relationships with broker-dealers, investment advisers and their clients. Others have focused on, offer and market specific product lines, which provide strong competition to certain of our asset classes. In addition, consolidation in the financial services industry has created stronger competitors, some with greater financial resources and broader distribution channels than our own.
We rely largely on third-party broker-dealers and other similar independent financial intermediaries to distribute and sell our fund shares. We have pursued and continue to pursue sales relationships with all types of financial intermediaries to broaden our distribution network. We have experienced increased costs related to maintaining our distribution channels and we anticipate that this trend will continue. A failure to maintain strong business relationships with the major intermediaries who currently distribute our products may also impair our distribution and sales operations. Additionally, competing broker-dealers whomthat we rely upon to distribute and sell our SIPsinvestment products may also sell their own proprietary funds and investment products, which could further limit the distribution of our investment products. Any inability to access and successfully sell our SIPsproducts to clients through third-party distribution channels could have a negative effect on our level of AUM, related revenues and overall business and financial condition.
We maintain a technology platform to compete within the rapidly developing and evolving marketplace. However, technologyTechnology is, however, subject to rapid change and we cannot guarantee that our competitors maywill not implement newer technologies or more advanced platforms for their products, which could affectnegatively impact our business.
We believe that we are well positioned to deal with changes in marketing trends as a result of our advertising activities and broad basedbroad-based marketplace recognition. In conjunction with our subsidiaries, we conduct advertising and promotional campaigns through various media sources to promote brand recognition, and advertise in major financial publications, as well as on television and the Internet, to promote brand name recognition and to assist our distribution network. Such activities include purchasing network and cable programming, sponsorship of sporting events, newspaper and magazine advertising, online and paid search advertising and social media marketing.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Certain financial information about our business segment and geographic areas is contained in Note 17 – Segment and Geographic Information in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10‑K, which is incorporated herein by reference.
REGULATION
We are subject to extensive regulation. Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various federal, state, and international regulation and supervision that continue to change and evolve over time. Consequently, there is uncertainty associated with the regulatory environments in which we operate. The rules and regulations applicable to investment management organizations are very detailed and technical. Accordingly, the discussion below is general in nature, does not purport to be complete and is current only as of the date of this report.
U.S. Regulation
Our U.S. Regulatory Framework. As a U.S. reporting company, we are subject to U.S. federal securities laws, state securities and corporate laws, state escheatment laws and regulations, and the rules and regulations of certain regulatory and self-regulatory organizations, such as the SEC and the NYSE. In particular, we are subject to various securities, compliance, corporate governance and disclosure rules adopted by the SEC. We are also subject to various other federal and state laws, including those affecting corporate governance and disclosure, such as the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, the Exchange Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the USA Patriot Act of 2001. As a NYSE-listed company, we are also subject to NYSE listing and disclosure requirements.
As a global investment management organization, certain of our subsidiaries are also subject to the rules and regulations of various regulatory and self-regulatory organizations, including the SEC, FINRA, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading


12

Table of Contents

Commission (“CFTC”), the National Futures Association, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the U.S. Department of Labor, and the U.S. Department of Treasury (“USDT”). Given our global operations, our subsidiaries are also subject to various securities, compliance, corporate governance, disclosure, privacy, anti-bribery and anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, anti-terrorist financing, and economic, trade and sanctions laws and regulations, both domestically and internationally, as well as to various cross-border rules and regulations, such as the data protection rules under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”). Our non-U.S. operations also may be subject to regulation by U.S. regulators, including the SEC, the CFTC and the DOJ (for example with respect to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977). We are also subject to the sanctions programs administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the USDT, as well as sanctions programs adopted and administered by non-U.S. jurisdictions where our services and products are offered. Our subsidiaries with custody of client assets or accounts are also subject to the applicable laws and regulations of U.S. states and other non-U.S. jurisdictions regarding the reporting and escheatment of unclaimed or abandoned property.
Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the SEC under the Advisers Act, the CFTC, and/or registered with or licensed by various non-U.S. regulators. In addition, many of our funds are registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act or under other non-U.S. laws, including EU laws. These registrations, licenses and authorizations impose numerous obligations, as well as detailed operational requirements, on such subsidiaries and funds. The Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on our registered investment adviser subsidiaries, including record keeping, operating and marketing requirements, disclosure obligations and prohibitions on fraudulent activities. The Investment Company Act imposes similar obligations on the registered investment companies advised by our subsidiaries. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act, ranging from fines and censure to termination of an investment adviser’s registration. Our subsidiaries must also comply with complex tax regimes.
U.S. Regulatory Reforms. Over the years, the U.S. federal corporate governance and securities laws have been augmented substantially and made significantly more complex by various legislation. As we continue to address our legal and regulatory requirements or focus on meeting new or expanded requirements, we may need to expend a substantial amount of additional time, costs and resources.Regulatory reforms may add further complexity to our business and operations and could require us to alter our investment management services and related activities, which could be costly, impede our growth and adversely impact our AUM, revenues and income.Certain key regulatory reforms in the U.S. that impact or relate to our business, and may cause us to incur additional obligations, include:
Dodd-Frank. In July 2010, Dodd-Frank was adopted in the U.S. Dodd-Frank is expansive in scope and has required the adoption of extensive regulations and the issuance of numerous regulatory decisions, while certain proposed rules remain subject to final adoption.
Systemically Important Financial Institutions. Dodd-Frank authorized the establishment of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), the mandate of which is to identify and respond to threats to U.S. financial stability. Similarly, the U.S. and other members of the G-20 group of nations have empowered the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) to identify and respond, in a coordinated manner, to threats to global financial stability. The FSOC may designate certain non-bank financial companies as systemically important financial institutions (“SIFIs”), which are subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The FSB may designate certain non-bank financial companies as global systemically important financial institutions (“G-SIFIs”); the additional regulatory requirements triggered by any such designation are not yet established. The FSOC and the FSB, as well as other global regulators, are considering what threats to U.S. and global financial stability, if any, arise from asset management companies and/or the funds that they sponsor or manage, and whether such threats can be mitigated by treating such entities as SIFIs or G-SIFIs and/or subjecting them to additional regulation. To the extent that we or any of our funds are designated as a SIFI or G-SIFI, such designations add additional supervision and/or regulation, which could include requirements related to risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity, credit exposure, stress testing, resolution plans, early remediation, and certain risk management requirements, that could impact our business.
Derivatives and Other Financial Products. Dodd-Frank, as well as other legislation and regulations, impose restrictions and limitations on us related to our financial services and products, resulting in increased scrutiny and oversight. Under Dodd-Frank’s regulations governing derivative transactions, certain categories of swaps are required to be submitted for clearing by a regulated clearing organization and reported on a swap execution facility. The EU and other countries have implemented, or are in the process of implementing, similar requirements. There is some risk that full mutual recognition may not be achieved between the various regulators, which may cause us to incur duplicate regulation and transaction costs. The SEC has also proposed a rule that would impose restrictions on the use of derivatives by registered funds.


13

Table of Contents

Rules adopted by the CFTC haveremoved or limited previously available exemptions and exclusions from registration and regulation as a commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor on which we had relied, resulting in the imposition of either additional registration, disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping requirements or more stringent requirements to comply with the remaining exemptions or exclusions for operators of certain of our registered funds and other pooled vehicles that use or trade in futures, swaps and other derivatives considered commodity interests and subject to regulation by the CFTC.
In addition, SEC rules have changed the structure and operation for certain types of money market funds, and certain U.S.-registered funds are required to adopt liquidity management programs.
Privacy and Data Protection. There also has been increased regulation with respect to the protection of customer privacy and data, and the need to secure sensitive customer, employee and others’ information. As the regulatory focus on privacy continues to intensify and laws and regulations concerning the management of personal data expand, risks related to privacy and data collection within our business will increase. In addition to the EU’s GDPR data protection rules, we may also be or become subject to or affected by additional country, federal and state laws, regulations and guidance impacting consumer privacy, such as the recently enacted California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) effective January 2020, which provides for enhanced consumer protections for California residents and statutory fines for data security breaches or other CCPA violations.
Rule 12b-1 Plans. In 2010, the SEC proposed changes to Rule 12b-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act that, if adopted, could limit our ability to recover expenses relating to the distribution of our funds, which could decrease our revenues. FINRA Conduct Rules limit the amount of aggregate sales charges that may be paid in connection with the purchase and holding of investment company shares sold through broker-dealers. The effect of the rule is to limit the amount of fees that could be paid pursuant to a fund’s Rule 12b-1 Plan to FTDI, our principal sales and distribution subsidiary in the U.S., which earns distribution fees on the distribution of fund shares in the U.S.
SEC Regulation Best Interest. In June 2019, the SEC adopted a package of new rules, amendments and interpretations, including Regulation Best Interest and a new form of relationship summary, designed to enhance investor protections for all retail customers, that will, subject to a transition period until June 30, 2020, among other things: (i) require broker-dealers to act in the best interest of their retail customers when recommending securities and account types, (ii) raise the broker-dealer standard of conduct beyond existing suitability obligations, and (iii) require a new relationship summary disclosure document to inform retail clients of the nature of the broker-dealers’ relationships with investment professionals and registered investment advisers, including a description of services offered, the legal standards of conduct that apply to each, the fees a client might pay, and conflicts of interest that may exist.
U.S. and Global Tax Compliance. The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes various changes to the tax law, including a permanent reduction in the corporate income tax rate and one-time transition tax on certain non-U.S. earnings. See Note 13 – Taxes on Income in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10‑K for more information. Further, pursuant to ongoing efforts to encourage global tax compliance, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) has adopted a global common reporting standard for the automatic exchange of financial information among participating countries (“CRS”), aimed at ensuring that persons with financial assets located outside of their tax residence country pay required taxes. In many cases, intergovernmental agreements between the participating countries will govern implementation of the new CRS rules. CRS is being implemented over a multi-year period and we will continue to monitor the implementing regulations and corresponding intergovernmental agreements to determine our requirements. CRS may subject us to additional reporting, compliance and administrative costs, and burdens in jurisdictions where we operate as a qualifying financial institution.
The OECD has also undertaken a new project focused on “Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalization of the Economy.” This project may impact all multinational businesses by allocating a greater share of taxing rights to countries where consumers are located regardless of the current physical presence of a business, and by implementing a global minimum tax. There is significant uncertainty regarding such proposal and any unfavorable resolution could have an adverse effect on our effective tax rate.
Non-U.S. Regulation
Our operations outside the U.S. are subject to the laws and regulations of various non-U.S. jurisdictions and non-U.S. regulatory agencies and bodies. As we continue to expand our international presence, a number of our subsidiaries and international operations have become subject to regulatory systems, in various jurisdictions, comparable to those covering our operations in the U.S. Regulators in these non-U.S. jurisdictions may have broad authority with respect to the regulation of financial services including, among other things, the authority to grant or cancel required licenses or registrations. In


14

Table of Contents

addition, these regulators may subject certain of our subsidiaries to net capital and other financial or operational requirements.
European Markets and Regulation. In Luxembourg, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (“CSSF”) currently regulates our substantial activities in Luxembourg, including our subsidiary Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l. (“FTIS Lux”). FTIS Lux is licensed as a management company for both the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (“UCITS”) and alternative investment funds (“AIFs”) and, as such, it manages our Luxembourg-domiciled UCITS and our EU-domiciled AIFs. FTIS Lux’s license also covers certain MiFID (as defined below) investment services, such as discretionary portfolio management, investment advice and reception and transmission of orders in relation to financial instruments. The CSSF’s rules include capital resource, governance and risk management requirements, business conduct rules, remuneration rules and oversight of systems and controls. Breaches of these rules could result in a wide range of disciplinary actions against FTIS Lux.
In the U.K., the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) and the Prudential Regulation Authorities (the “PRA”) currently regulate certain of our subsidiaries. Authorization by the FCA and the PRA is required to conduct any financial services-related business in the U.K. pursuant to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The FCA’s and PRAs rules under that act govern a firm’s capital resources requirements, senior management arrangements, business conduct, interaction with clients, and systems and controls. Breaches of these rules could result in a wide range of disciplinary actions against our U.K.-regulated subsidiaries.
In addition to the above, certain of our other European subsidiaries and branches, must comply with the pan-European regime established by the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”), which regulates the provision of investment services and conduct of investment activities throughout the European Economic Area (“EEA”). MiFID sets out detailed requirements governing the organization and business conduct of investment firms and regulated markets. It also includes pre- and post-trade transparency requirements for equity markets and extensive transaction reporting requirements. Luxembourg and the U.K. have adopted the MiFID rules into national legislation, as have those other EU member states in which we have a presence.
A review of MiFID by the European Commission led to the creation of a replacement directive and a new regulation (together “MiFID II”), effective as of January 2018, which extended the scope of the original MiFID in response to issues raised by the financial crisis. Changes apply to pre- and post-trade reporting obligations and there is an expansion of the types of instruments subject to these requirements, such as bonds, structured products and derivatives. A new concept of trading venue has been created and algorithmic trading is subject to specific regulations. There are also changes to business conduct requirements, including selling practices, intermediary inducements and client categorization, as well as the provision of investment advice and management within the EU by non-EU advisers, including ours. Powers have also been given to EU national regulators to ban certain services and products and to the European Securities and Markets Authority to temporarily restrict certain financial activities within the EU.
One of the most significant developments in MiFID II is the ban on commission and other payments (“inducements”) to independent advisers and discretionary managers, which has changed the commercial relationships between fund providers and distributors. Arrangements with non-independent advisers have also been affected, as narrower rules around the requirement that any commission reflects an enhancement of the service to customers come into effect, along with a prescriptive list of permissible non-monetary benefits. The interpretation of the inducements rules has also resulted in major changes to how fund managers finance investment research with many firms, including ours, opting to pay for third-party investment research for client accounts covered by MiFID II.
The European Market Infrastructure Regulation that sets out the rules in relation to central clearing of specified derivatives came into effect in 2016 for large derivatives users (including some of our clients). For the smallest counterparties, implementation was delayed until June 2019. Mutual recognition of central counterparties has been achieved between the EU regulatory authorities and other important jurisdictions including the U.S. In addition, rules relating to margin requirements for uncleared over-the-counter derivatives came into effect in September 2017. Future regulatory policy reviews will decide whether these rules are extended to other types of derivative instruments, which could increase operational costs for our business and transactional costs for our clients.
The EU’s Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”) came into effect in July 2014, and regulates managers of, and service providers to, AIFs that are domiciled and offered in the EU and that are not authorized as retail funds under UCITS. The AIFMD also regulates the marketing within the EU of all AIFs, including those domiciled outside the EU. The introduction of a third-country passport to non-EU AIFs/AIF managers was due to be implemented in 2018, but has been delayed until further positive advice is delivered to the European Commission regarding a sufficient number of non-EU


15

Table of Contents

countries to better evaluate the impact, including with respect to the proposed withdrawal of the U.K. from the EU. Compliance with the AIFMD’s requirements may restrict AIF marketing and imposes compliance obligations in the form of remuneration policies, capital requirements, reporting requirements, leverage oversight, valuation, stakes in EU companies, the domicile, duties and liability of custodians and liquidity management.
The EU’s Market Abuse Regulation (“MAR”) came into effect in July 2016, and its primary aim is to increase market integrity and investor protection, enhancing the attractiveness of securities markets for raising capital. Under MAR, EU market abuse rules become extra-territorial as long as the instrument has a listing on an EEA regulated market.
As of January 2018, the EU regulation on packaged retail investment and insurance products (“PRIIPs”) imposed new pre-contractual disclosure requirements under the form of a Key Information Document (“KID”) for the benefit of retail investors when they are considering the purchase of packaged retail investment products or insurance based products. It requires PRIIP manufacturers to draw up a KID that can be no longer than three pages in length and must be written in simple language. The regulation allows UCITS providers, who are already required to produce the UCITS Key Investor Information Document, a transitional period until December 2021, during which they will be exempt from its terms.
As of May 2018, the EU’s GDPR strengthened and unified data protection rules for individuals within the EU. GDPR also addresses export of personal data outside the EU. The primary objectives of GDPR are to give citizens control of their personal data and to simplify the regulatory environment for international business by unifying data protection regulation within the EU. Compliance with the stringent data protection rules under GDPR requires an extensive review of all of our global data processing systems. The failure to comply properly with GDPR rules on a timely basis and to maintain ongoing compliance with such rules may subject us to enforcement proceedings and significant fines and costs.
British Exit from the EU (“Brexit”). Although Brexit negotiations between the U.K. and EU began in June 2017, it is still unclear what terms, if any, may be agreed to in the final outcome and for any transitional period. While we are monitoring the consequences very closely for our clients from an investment perspective, we believe that Brexit will not have a material impact on the way our firm operates in the U.K. or within the EU. Our long-standing U.K. businesses are expected to continue to provide their services to U.K. customers. Furthermore, we have other regulated subsidiaries across continental Europe such that, in the event of a future restriction on cross-border trade in financial services and products between the U.K. and the new EU, Brexit would be likely to have a limited effect on our EU business. Moreover, our cross-border UCITS SICAV investment fund range, which is the most widely-distributed such range in the world, is based in Luxembourg. We have a separate, U.K.-domiciled fund range that is, and will continue to be, distributed mainly in the U.K.
Canada. In Canada, our subsidiaries are subject to provincial and territorial laws and are registered with and regulated by provincial and territorial securities regulatory authorities. The mandate of Canadian securities regulatory authorities is generally to protect investors and to foster fair and efficient capital markets. Securities regulatory authorities impose certain requirements on registrants, including a standard of conduct, capital and insurance, record keeping, regulatory financial reporting, conflict of interest management, compliance systems and security holder reporting. Failure to comply with applicable securities laws, regulations and rules could result in, among other things, reprimands, suspension of or restrictions on an individuals or firms registration, prohibitions from becoming or acting as a registrant, administrative penalties or disgorgement. In addition, as a federally licensed trust company, FTCC is subject to regulation and supervision by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada and another subsidiary, FTC Investor Services Inc., is a member of and regulated by the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada. These regulatory bodies have similar requirements to those of the securities regulatory authorities with a view to ensuring the capital adequacy and sound business practices of the subsidiaries and the appropriate treatment of their clients.
In September 2018, the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”), the umbrella organization of provincial and territorial securities regulatory authorities, published draft rule amendments for comment regarding their mutual fund fee reform project. The proposed reforms include expanded conflict of interest guidance concerning the payment of embedded commissions by investment fund managers and the receipt of such commissions by dealers, a prohibition on all forms of deferred sales charges in connection with the purchase of mutual fund securities, and a prohibition on the payment of trailing commissions to discount brokers in respect of their distribution of mutual fund securities. Separately, in October 2019, the CSA published final amendments to their registration rules to implement their client focused reforms initiative. The stated purposes of these amendments are to better align the interests of Canadian registrants with the interests of their clients, to improve outcomes for clients and to make clearer to clients the nature and the terms of their relationship with registrants. The amendments, among other things, enhance current registrant requirements in the areas of know your client, know your product, suitability, conflicts of interest and relationship disclosure information. Provided all necessary approvals are obtained, the amendments will become effective in December 2019 and will be phased in during a two-year transition period.


16

Table of Contents

Singapore. In Singapore, our subsidiaries are subject to, among others, the Securities and Futures Act (“SFA”), the Financial Advisers Act (“FAA”) and the subsidiary legislation promulgated pursuant to these Acts, which are administered by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”). Our asset management subsidiary and its employees conducting regulated activities specified in the SFA and/or the FAA are required to be licensed with the MAS. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, codes, directives, notices and guidelines issued by the MAS may result in penalties including fines, censures and the suspension or revocation of licenses granted by the MAS.
Australia. In Australia, our subsidiaries are subject to various Australian federal and state laws and are regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”). ASIC regulates companies, financial markets and financial services in Australia. ASIC imposes certain conditions on licensed financial services organizations that apply to our subsidiaries, including requirements relating to capital resources, operational capability and controls. Failure to comply with applicable law, regulations or conditions could result in various sanctions being imposed including cancellation, suspension or variation of the licenses held by our Australian subsidiaries.
Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, our subsidiary is subject to the Securities and Futures Ordinance (the “SFO”) and its subsidiary legislation, which governs the securities and futures markets and regulates, among others, offers of investments to the public and provides for the licensing of dealing in securities and asset management activities and intermediaries. This legislation is administered by the Securities and Futures Commission (the “SFC”). The SFC is also empowered under the SFO to establish standards for compliance as well as codes and guidelines. Our subsidiary and its employees conducting any of the regulated activities specified in the SFO are required to be licensed with the SFC, and are subject to the rules, codes and guidelines issued by the SFC from time to time. Failure to comply with the applicable laws, regulations, codes and guidelines could result in various sanctions being imposed, including fines, reprimands and the suspension or revocation of the licenses granted by the SFC.
India. In India, certain of our subsidiaries are primarily subject to relevant regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”). Changes made by SEBI to the mutual fund regulations in 2018 reduced the total expense ratio chargeable to funds and banned, with some exceptions, payment of upfront commissions to distributors of funds. Under the prevailing regulations, all trail commissions must be paid within the total expense ratio charged to the funds. These changes may impact the commercial relationships between fund providers and distributors. However, the recent reduction in corporate tax announced by the Indian government may have a positive impact on our subsidiaries in India. The Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”), the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) and the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (“DIPP”) are the other major regulatory authorities that are capable of issuing directions of a binding nature to our subsidiaries in India. A failure to comply with the applicable laws, regulations, codes, notices, directives, guidelines, orders, circulars and schemes issued by SEBI, RBI, MCA or DIPP may result in penalties including fines, censures and/or suspension or revocation of licenses, approvals or registration status.
Japan. In Japan, our subsidiaries are subject to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (the “FIEL”) and the Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations. These laws are administered and enforced by the Japanese Financial Services Agency (the “JFSA”), which establishes standards for compliance, including capital adequacy and financial soundness requirements, customer protection requirements, and business conduct rules. The JFSA is empowered to conduct administrative proceedings that can result in censure, fine, the issuance of cease and desist orders or the suspension or revocation of registrations and licenses granted under the FIEL.
Other Non-U.S. Jurisdictions. There are similar legal and regulatory arrangements in effect in many other non-U.S. jurisdictions where our subsidiaries, branches and representative offices, as well as certain joint ventures or companies in which we own minority stakes, are authorized to conduct business. We are also subject to regulation and supervision by, among others, the Securities Commission of The Bahamas, the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários in Brazil, the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, the China Securities Regulatory Commission in the People’s Republic of China, the Autorité des Marchés Financiers in France, the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority in Germany, the Central Bank of Ireland, the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa in Italy, the Financial Services Commission and the Financial Supervisory Service in South Korea, the Securities Commission in Malaysia, the Comision Nacional Bancaria y de Valores in Mexico, the Autoriteit Financiële Markten in the Netherlands, the Polish Securities and Exchange Commission, the Romanian Financial Services Authority, the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores in Spain, the Finansinspektionen in Sweden, the Swiss Federal Banking Commission, the Financial Supervisory Commission in the Republic of China, the Dubai Financial Services Authority in the United Arab Emirates, and the State Securities Commission of Vietnam.


17

Table of Contents

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We have used, registered, and/or applied to register certain trademarks, service marks and trade names to distinguish our sponsored investment products and services from those of our competitors in the U.S. and in other countries and jurisdictions, including, but not limited to, Franklin®, Templeton®, Balanced Equity Management®, Benefit Street Partners®, Darby®, Edinburgh Partners™, Fiduciary Trust™, Franklin Bissett®, Franklin Mutual Series®, Franklin BissettK2®, Fiduciary Trust™, Darby and LibertyShares®, Balanced Equity Management®, K2® and LibertyShares™. Our trademarks, service marks and trade names are important to us and, accordingly, we enforce our trademark, service mark and trade name rights. The Franklin Templeton Investments® brand has been, and continues to be, extremely well received both in our industry and with our clients, reflecting the fact that our brand, like our business, is based in part on trust and confidence. If our brand is harmed, our future business prospects may be adversely affected.
EMPLOYEES
As of September 30, 20162019, we employed approximately 9,1009,600 employees and operated offices in 35over 30 countries. We consider our relations with our employees to be satisfactory.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Franklin files reports with the SEC, including current and periodic reports, proxy statements and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC from time to time. The public may read and copy any of these filings at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains current and periodic reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including Franklin, that file electronically with the SEC, at www.sec.gov. Additional information about the Company’sFranklin’s filings can also be obtained at our website at www.franklinresources.com under “Investor Relations.” We make available free of charge on our website ourFranklin’s Annual Report on Form 10-K,10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,10‑Q, Current Reports



18

Table of Contents

on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Company has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on the Company’s website under “Corporate Governance” and are available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy.
Committee Charters. The Company’s Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board of Directors has adopted written charters for each such committee, which are posted on the Company’s website under “Corporate Governance” and are available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy.
Item 1A.Risk Factors.
MARKET AND VOLATILITY RISKS
Volatility and disruption of the capital and credit markets, and adverse changes in the global economy, may significantly affect our results of operations and may put pressure on our financial results. The capital and credit markets continuemay, from time to time, experience volatility and disruption worldwide. Declines in global financial market conditions have in the past resulted in significant decreases in our assets under management (“AUM”),AUM, revenues and income, and future declines may further negatively impact our financial results. Such declines have had, and may in the future have, an adverse impact on our results of operations. We may need to modify our business, strategies or operations and we may be subject to additional constraints or costs in order to compete in a changing global economy and business environment.
The amount and mix of our AUM are subject to significant fluctuations. Fluctuations in the amount and mix of our AUM may be attributable in part to market conditions outside of our control that have had, and in the future could have, a negative impact on our revenues and income. We derive substantially all of our operating revenues and net income from providing investment management and related services to investors globallyin jurisdictions worldwide through our investment products, thatwhich include our sponsored funds, as well as institutional and high-net-worth separate accounts, and sub-advised products. In addition to investment fundsmanagement, our services include fund administration, sales and institutional, high net-worthdistribution, and separately-managed accounts (collectively, our “sponsored investment products”shareholder servicing. We may perform services directly or “SIPs”).through third parties. The level of our revenues depends largely on the level and relative mix of AUM. Our investment management fee revenues are primarily based on a percentage of the value of AUM and vary with the nature and strategies of the SIPs managed.our products. Any decrease in the value or amount of our AUM because of market volatility or other factors, such as a decline in the price of stocks, in particular market segments or in the securities market generally, negatively impacts our revenues and income.
We are subject to significant risk of asset volatility from changes in the global financial, equity, debt and commodity markets.Individual financial, equity, debt and commodity markets may be adversely affected by financial, economic, political, electoral, diplomatic or other instabilities that are particular to the country or region in which a market is located, including without limitation local acts of terrorism, economic crises, political protests, insurrection or other business, social or political crises. Global economic conditions, exacerbated by war, terrorism, natural disasters or financial crises, changes in the equity, debt or commodity marketplaces, changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates, inflation rates, the yield curve, defaults by trading counterparties, bond defaults, revaluation and bond market liquidity risks, geopolitical risks, the imposition of economic sanctions and other factors that are difficult to predict, affect the mix, market values and levels of our AUM. For example, changes in financial market prices, currency exchange rates and/or interest rates have in the past caused, and could


18

Table of Contents

in the future cause, the value of our AUM to decline, which would result in lower investment management fee revenues. Changing market conditions could also cause an impairment to the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets. The
Our funds we manage may be subject to liquidity risks or an unanticipated large number of redemptions as a result of theredemptions. Due to market volatility or other events or conditions described above, causing theour funds may need to sell securities or instruments that they hold, possibly at a loss, or draw on any available lines of credit, to obtain cash to maintain sufficient liquidity or settle these redemptions, or settle in-kind with securities held in the applicable fund. WeWhile we have no legal or contractual obligation to do so, we have in the past provided, and may in the future at our discretion provide, financial support to our funds we manage to enable them to maintain sufficient liquidity in any such event. Changes in investor preferences regarding our more popular investment products have in the past caused, and could in the future cause, sizable redemptions and lower the value of our AUM, which would result in lower revenue and operating results. Moreover, changingAny decrease in the level of our AUM resulting from market declines, credit or interest rate volatility or uncertainty, increased redemptions or other factors could negatively impact our revenues and income.
A shift in our asset mix toward lower fee products may negatively impact our revenues.Changing market conditions and investor preferences may cause a shift in our asset mix between international and U.S. assets, potentially resulting in a decline in our revenues and income depending upon the nature of our AUM and the level of management fees we earn based on our AUM. We generally derive higher investment management and distribution fees from our internationaltoward certain lower fee products, than from our U.S. products, and higher sales fees from our U.S. products than from our international products. Additionally, changing market conditions may cause a shift in our asset mix towardssuch as fixed income products, and away from equity and hybrid products, andmulti-asset/balanced products. This may cause a related decline in our revenues and income, as we generally derive higher fee revenues and income from our equity and certain hybridmulti-asset/balanced products than from our fixed income products we manage. Further, increasesproducts. Increases in interest rates, in particular if rapid, as well as any uncertainty in the future direction of interest rates, may have a negative impact on our fixed income products. Although the shorter duration of the bond investments in many of these products may help mitigate the



19

Table of Contents

interest rate risk, rising interest rates or interest rate uncertainty typically decrease the total return on many bond investments due to lower market valuations of existing bonds. Any decreaseFurther, changing market conditions and investor preferences also may cause a shift in our asset mix toward lower fee exchange-traded funds. Moreover, we generally derive higher investment management and distribution fees from our international products than from our U.S. products, and higher sales fees from our U.S. products than from our international products. Changing market conditions may cause a shift in our asset mix between international and U.S. assets, potentially resulting in a decline in our revenues and income depending upon the nature of our AUM and the level of management fees we earn on that AUM.
We may not effectively manage risks associated with the replacement of benchmark indices. The withdrawal and replacement of widely used benchmark indices such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) with alternative benchmark rates may introduce a number of risks for our business, our clients and the financial services industry more widely. These include financial risks arising from potential changes in the valuation of financial instruments linked to benchmark indices, pricing and operational risks, and legal implementation and revised documentation risks. The FCA in the U.K., which regulates LIBOR, has announced that it will no longer compel panel banks to submit rates for LIBOR after 2021. Accordingly, the withdrawal and replacement of LIBOR may pose financial risks and uncertainties to our business. We also may face operational challenges adopting successor benchmarks.
INVESTMENT AND PERFORMANCE RISKS
Poor investment performance of our products could reduce the level of our AUM resulting from market declines, interest rate volatility or uncertainty, increased redemptions or other factors couldaffect our sales, and negatively impact our revenues and income.
We are subjectOur investment performance, along with achieving and maintaining superior distribution and client service, is critical to extensive, complex, overlappingthe success of our business. Strong investment performance often stimulates sales of our products. Poor investment performance as compared to third-party benchmarks or competitive products has in the past led, and frequently changing rules, regulationscould in the future lead, to a decrease in sales of our products and legal interpretations.stimulate redemptions from existing products, generally lowering the overall level of AUM and reducing the management fees we earn. There is uncertainty associated with the regulatory environmentsno assurance that past or present investment performance in whichour products will be indicative of future performance. If we operate. As described below, our business is subjectfail, or appear to extensive and complex, overlapping and/or conflicting, and frequently changing and increasing number of rules, regulations, policies and legal interpretations in the countries in which we operate, including those with respect to securities and other financial instruments, investment and advisory matters, accounting, tax, compensation, ethics, data protection, privacy, sanctions programs, and escheatment laws and regulations.
As a U.S. reporting company, we are subject to U.S. federal securities laws, state laws regarding securities fraud, other federal and state laws and rules and regulations of certain regulatory and self-regulatory organizations, including those rules and regulations promulgated by, among others, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange. As a global investment management organization, certain of our subsidiaries are also subject to the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), the National Futures Association, the U.S. Department of Treasury and the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”). Given our global operations, we are also subject to securities laws and other laws of various non-U.S. jurisdictions and to regulation by non-U.S. regulators including, among others, the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) Financial Conduct Authority, the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, the Canadian Securities Administrators, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, the Japanese Financial Services Agency and various international stock exchanges. In some cases, our non-U.S. operations may also be subject to regulation by U.S. regulators, such as the Department of Justice, the CFTC and the SEC (for example, with respect to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977). We are also subject not only to the sanctions programs administered by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, but also to sanctions programs adopted and administered by non-U.S. jurisdictions where our investment management services and products are offered. Further, we are also subject to the laws and regulations of states and other jurisdictions regarding the reporting and escheatment of unclaimed or abandoned property.
Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the CFTC and/or licensed by various non-U.S. regulators. In addition, many of our funds are registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”) or authorized by various European and other non-U.S. regulators pursuant to the European Union's (“EU”) Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (“UCITS”) Directive, or authorized under other non-U.S. laws in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Asia-Pacific, Canada and Latin America. These registrations, licenses and authorizations impose numerous obligations, as well as detailed operational requirements, on such subsidiaries and such funds. Our subsidiaries must also comply with complex tax regimes.
Financial reporting requirements, and the processes, controls and procedures that have been put in placefail, to address them, are often comprehensivesuccessfully and complex. Wepromptly the underlying causes of any poor investment performance, we may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations or by changesunsuccessful in the interpretation ofrepairing any existing lawsharm to our performance and regulations. While management has focused attention and resources on our compliance policies, procedures and practices, non-compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, conflicts of interest requirements or fiduciary principles, or our inabilityfuture business prospects would likely be negatively affected.
Harm to keep up with, or adapt to, an ever changing, complex regulatory environment, could result in civil liability, criminal liability and/or sanctions against us, including fines and censures, injunctive relief, suspension or expulsion from a particular jurisdiction or market or the revocation of licenses or charters, any of which could adversely affect our reputation prospects,may negatively impact our revenues and income. Moreover, any potential accounting or reporting error, whether financial or otherwise, if material, could damageOur reputation is critical to the success of our business. We believe that our brand names have been, and continue to be, well received both in our industry and with our clients, reflecting the fact that our brands, like our business, are based in part on trust and confidence. If our reputation is harmed, existing clients may reduce amounts held in, or withdraw entirely from, our products, or our clients and adversely affectproducts may terminate their management agreements with us, which could reduce the amount of our AUM and cause us to suffer a corresponding loss in our revenues and income. In addition, reputational harm may prevent us from attracting new clients or developing new business.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) authorized the establishment of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), the mandate of which is to identify and respond to threats to U.S. financial stability. Similarly, the U.S. and other members of the G-20 group of nations have empowered the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) to identify and respond, in a coordinated manner, to threats to global financial stability. The FSOC may designate certain non-bank financial companies as systemically important financial institutions (“SIFIs”), which are subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The FSB may designate certain non-bank financial companies as global systemically important financial institutions (“G-SIFIs”); the additional regulatory requirements triggered by any such designation are not yet established. The FSOC and the FSB, as well as other global regulators, are considering what threats to U.S. and global financial stability, if any, arise from asset management companies and/or the funds that they manage, and whether such threats can be mitigated by treating such entities as SIFIs or





2019

Table of Contents


G-SIFIs and/or subjecting them to additional regulation. To the extent that we or any of our funds are designated as a SIFI or G-SIFI, such regulation, which could include requirements related to risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity, credit exposure, stress testing, resolution plans, early remediation, and certain risk management requirements, could impact our business. The Dodd-Frank Act, as well as other legislative and regulatory changes, impose other restrictions and limitations on us, resulting in increased scrutiny and oversight of our financial services and products. We continue to analyze the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act as implementing rules are adopted and become effective. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, which imposes a number of new regulations governing derivative transactions, certain categories of swaps are currently required, and further categories of swaps are likely to be required, to be submitted for clearing by a regulated clearing organization and reported on a swap execution facility, and the posting of collateral will be required for uncleared swaps. The EU and other countries are in the process of implementing similar requirements, and there is some risk that full mutual recognition may not be achieved between the various regimes, and duplication of regulation and transaction costs may result. These and other requirements are likely to impact how we manage our investment strategies because of, among other things, an increase in the costs and expenses of utilizing swaps and other derivatives. In addition, the SEC has adopted rules that have changed the structure and operation for certain types of money market funds, and has also proposed other rules that (i) would require certain registered funds to adopt liquidity management programs, and (ii) would impose restrictions on the use of derivatives by registered funds. We expect that the complex regulatory requirements and developments applicable to us will cause us to incur additional administrative and compliance costs.GLOBAL OPERATIONAL RISKS
Our subsidiary Fiduciary Trust Company International (“Fiduciary Trust”) and its subsidiaries remain subject to additional regulation, supervision and examination by their respective regulators. Certain federal and state anti-takeover laws generally provide that no person may acquire control of Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin”), and gain indirect control of Fiduciary Trust or its subsidiaries, without prior regulatory approval. Such federal and state laws may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of Franklin, including through transactions that some shareholders might consider desirable.
The laws and regulations applicable to our business generally involve restrictions and requirements in connection with a variety of technical, specialized, and expanding matters and concerns. For example, compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, anti-money laundering and Know Your Customer requirements, and economic, trade and other sanctions, both domestically and internationally, has taken on heightened importance as a result of efforts to, among other things, limit terrorism and actions that undermine the stability, sovereignty and territorial integrity of countries. At the same time, there has been increased regulation with respect to the protection of customer privacy and the need to secure sensitive customer information. As we continue to address these requirements or focus on meeting new or expanded ones, we may expend a substantial amount of time and resources. Any inability to meet these requirements within the required timeframes may subject us to sanctions or other restrictions by governments and/or regulators that could adversely impact our broader business objectives.
Global regulatory and legislative actions and reforms have made the regulatory environment in which we operate more costly and future actions and reforms could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. The U.S. federal securities laws have been augmented substantially and made significantly more complex by, among other measures, the Dodd-Frank Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the USA Patriot Act of 2001. Similarly, the securities and related laws outside the U.S. have been augmented substantially and made more complex by measures such as the EU’s Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”) and Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”). Further, in June 2016, a narrow majority of voters in a U.K. referendum voted to exit the EU (“Brexit”), but it is still unclear exactly what will be the U.K.’s status in relation to the EU when it ultimately leaves. Ongoing changes in the EU’s regulatory framework applicable to our business, including Brexit and any other changes in the composition of the EU’s member states, may add further complexity to our global risks and operations. Moreover, the adoption of new laws, regulations or standards and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws, regulations or standards have directly affected, and will continue to affect, our business. With new laws and changes in interpretation of existing requirements, the associated time we must dedicate to and related costs we must incur in meeting the regulatory complexities of our business have increased. In particular, certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and MiFID II still require the adoption of implementing rules. We may be required to invest significant additional management time and resources to address the new regulations being adopted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, MiFID II and other laws. Outlays associated with meeting regulatory complexities have also increased as we expand our business into new jurisdictions.
Further, pursuant to ongoing efforts to encourage global tax compliance, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development has adopted a global common reporting standard for the automatic exchange of financial information among participating countries (“CRS”), aimed at ensuring that persons with financial assets located outside of their tax residence



21

Table of Contents

country pay required taxes. In many cases, intergovernmental agreements between the participating countries will govern implementation of the new rules. CRS will be implemented over a multi-year period and we will continue to monitor the implementing regulations and corresponding intergovernmental agreements to determine our requirements. CRS may subject us to additional reporting, compliance and administrative costs and burdens in jurisdictions where we operate as a qualifying financial institution.
Compliance activities to address these and other new legal requirements have required, and will continue to require, us to expend additional time and resources, and, consequently, we are incurring increased costs of doing business, which potentially negatively impacts our profitability and future financial results. Finally, any further regulatory and legislative actions and reforms affecting the investment management industry, including compliance initiatives, may negatively impact revenues by increasing our costs of accessing or operating in the financial markets or by making certain investment offerings less favorable to our clients.

Failure to comply with the laws, rules or regulations in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate could result in substantial harm to our reputation and results of operations. As with all investment management companies, our activities are highly regulated in almost all countries in which we conduct business. The regulatory environments of the jurisdictions where we conduct our business or where our SIPs are organized or sold are complex, uncertain and subject to change. Local regulatory environments may vary widely and place additional demands on our sales, investment, legal and compliance personnel. Failure to comply with the applicable laws, rules, regulations, codes, directives, notices or guidelines in any of our jurisdictions could result in a wide range of penalties and disciplinary actions, including fines, censures and the suspension or expulsion from a particular jurisdiction or market or the revocation of licenses, any of which could adversely affect our reputation and operations. In recent years, the regulatory environments in which we operate have seen significant increased and evolving regulations, which have imposed and may continue to impose additional compliance and operational requirements and costs on us in the applicable jurisdictions. Regulators could also change their policies or laws in a manner that might restrict or otherwise impede our ability to offer our investment products and services in their respective markets, or we may be unable to keep up with, or adapt to, the ever changing, complex regulatory requirements in such jurisdictions or markets, which could further negatively impact our business.
Changes in tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, and are subject to ongoing tax audits, in various jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and assess additional taxes. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision. However, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the actual outcomes could have a material impact on our net income or financial condition. Changes in tax laws or tax rulings could materially impact our effective tax rate. For example, proposals for fundamental U.S. corporate tax reform, if enacted, could change the amount of taxes we are required to pay and could have a significant impact on our future results of operations, profitability and financial condition.
Any significant limitation, failure or security breach of our information and cyber security infrastructure, software applications, technology or other systems that are critical to our operations could disrupt our business and harm our operations and reputation. We are highly dependent upon the use of various proprietary and third-party information and security technology, software applications and other technology systems to operate our business. We are also dependent on the continuity and effectiveness of our information and cyber security infrastructure, policies, procedures and capabilities to protect our computer and telecommunications systems and the data that reside on or are transmitted through them and contracted third-party systems. We use technology to, among other things, support our business continuity and operations, store and maintain data, obtain securities pricing information, process client transactions, and provide reports and other customer services to the clients of the products we manage. Any disruptions, inaccuracies, delays, systems failures, data or privacy breaches, or other security breaches (including any cyber security breaches) in these and other processes could subject us to client dissatisfaction and losses and damage our reputation. Although we take protective measures, including measures to effectively secure information through system security technology, the technology systems we use may still be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other events that have a security impact, such as an external hacker attack by one or more cyber criminals (including phishing attacks attempting to obtain confidential information) or an authorized employee or vendor inadvertently causing us to release confidential information, which could materially harm our operations and reputation. Potential system disruptions, failures or breaches of the technology systems we use, and the costs necessary to address them, could result in: material financial loss or costs; the unauthorized disclosure or modification of sensitive or confidential information; loss of valuable information; breach of client contracts; liability for stolen assets, information or identity; remediation costs to repair



22

Table of Contents

damage caused by the failure or breach; additional security costs to mitigate against future incidents; reputational harm; regulatory actions; and/or legal claims, liability and litigation costs resulting from the incident. Moreover, loss or unauthorized disclosure or transfer of confidential customer identification information could harm our reputation and subject us to liability under laws that protect confidential personal data, resulting in increased costs or a decline in our revenues or common stock price. Further, although we take precautions to password protect and encrypt our laptops and sensitive information on our other mobile electronic devices, if such devices are stolen, misplaced or left unattended, they may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use, creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially costly actions by us.
Most of the software applications that we use in our business are licensed from, and supported, upgraded and maintained by, third-party vendors. Our third-party applications include enterprise cloud storage and cloud computing application services provided and maintained by third-party vendors. A suspension or termination of certain of these licenses or the related support, upgrades and maintenance could cause temporary system delays or interruption that could adversely impact our business. In addition, the failure to properly manage and operate the data centers we use could have an adverse impact on our business. Although we have in place certain disaster recovery plans, we may experience system delays and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, power failures, acts of war, and third-party failures. Technology is subject to rapid advancements and changes and our competitors may from time to time implement more advanced technology platforms for their products, which could adversely affect our business.
Our business operations are complex and a failure to properly perform operational tasks properly or the misrepresentation of our productsservices and services,products, or the termination of investment management agreements representing a significant portion of our AUM, could have an adverse effect on our revenues and income.Through our subsidiaries, we provide investment management and related services to our SIPs. In addition to investment management, our services include fund administration, sales, distribution, marketing, shareholder servicing, and other fiduciary services.investors globally. In order to be competitive and comply with our agreements, we must properly perform our fund and portfolio administration and related responsibilities, including portfolio recordkeeping and accounting, security pricing, corporate actions, investment restrictions compliance, daily net asset value computations, account reconciliations, and required distributions to fund shareholders. Many of our operations are complex and dependent on our ability to process and monitor a large number of transactions effectively, which may occur across numerous markets and currencies at high volumes and frequencies. Although we expend considerable resources on internal controls, supervision, technology and training in an effort to ensure that such transactions do not violate applicable guidelines, rules and regulations or adversely affect our clients, counterparties or us, our operations are ultimately dependent on our employees, as well as others involved in our business, such as third-party vendors, providers and other intermediaries, and subject to potential human errors. Our employees and others involved in our business may, from time to time, make mistakes that are not always immediately detected, which may disrupt our operations, cause losses, lead to regulatory fines or sanctions, litigation, or otherwise damage our reputation. In addition, the intentional or unintentionalany misrepresentation of our productsservices and servicesproducts in advertising materials, public relations information, social media or other external communications could also adversely affect our reputation and business prospects. Our investment management fees, which represent the majority of our revenues, are dependent on fees earned under investment management agreements that we have with our SIPs.products and clients. Our revenues could be adversely affected if such agreements representing a significant portion of our AUM are terminated or significantly altered.terminated. Further, certain of our subsidiaries may act as general partner for various investment partnerships, which may subject them to liability for the partnerships liabilities. If we fail to properly perform and monitor our operations properly, our business could suffer and our revenues and income could be adversely affected.
We face risks, and corresponding potential costs and expenses, associated with conducting operations and growing our business in numerous countries. We sell our SIPsproducts, such as our funds and strategies, and offer our investment management and related services, in many different regulatory jurisdictions around the world, and intend to continue to expand our operations internationally. As we do so, we will continue to face challenges to the adequacy of our resources, procedures and controls to operate our business consistently and effectively operate our business.effectively. In order to remain competitive, we must be proactive and prepared to implement necessary resources when growth opportunities present themselves, whether as a result of a business acquisition or rapidly increasing business activities in particular markets or regions. Local regulatory environments may vary widely in terms of scope, adequacy and sophistication. Similarly, local distributors, and their policies and practices as well as financial viability, may also vary widely orand they may be inconsistent or less developed or mature than other more internationally focused distributors. Notwithstanding potential long-term cost savings, by increasing certain operations, such as transfer agent and other back-office operations, in countries or regions of the world with lower operating costs, growth of our international operations may involve near-term increases in expenses, as well as additional capital costs, such as information systems and technology costs, and costs related to compliance with particular regulatory or other local requirements or needs. Local requirements or needs may also place additional demands on sales and compliance personnel and resources, such as meeting local language requirements, while also integrating personnel into an organization with a single operating language. Finding, hiring and retaining additional, well-qualified personnel and crafting and adopting policies, procedures and controls to address local or regional requirements remain a challengechallenges as we expand our operations internationally.
Moreover, regulators in non-U.S. jurisdictions could also change their policies or laws in a manner that might restrict or otherwise impede our ability to distribute or authorize investment products or maintain their authorizations in their respective markets. Any of these local requirements, activities or needs could increase the costs and expenses we incur in a specific jurisdiction without any corresponding increase in revenues and income from operating in the jurisdiction. Certain laws and regulations both inside and outside the U.S. have included extraterritorial application. This may lead to duplicative or conflicting legal or regulatory burdens and additional costs and risks. For example, although negotiations between the U.K. and EU regarding Brexit began in June 2017, it is still unclear what terms, if any, may be agreed to in the final outcome and for any transitional period, and the ultimate impact on us.
In addition, from time to time, we



23

Table of Contents

enter into international joint ventures or take minority stakes in companies in which we typically do not have control. These investments may involve risks, including the risk that the controlling stakeholder or our joint venture partner may have business interests, strategies or goals that are inconsistent with ours, and the risk thatours. The business decisions or other actions or omissions of the controlling stakeholder, our joint venture partner or the entity itself may result in liability forto us or harm to our reputation, or adversely affect the value of our investment in the entity.
We depend on key personnel and our financial performance could be negatively affected by the loss of their services. The success of our business will continue to depend upon our key personnel, including our portfolio and fund managers, investment analysts, investment advisers, sales and management personnel and other professionals as well as our executive officers and business unit heads. Competition for qualified, motivated, and highly skilled executives, professionals and other key personnel in the investment management industry remains significant. Our success depends to a substantial degree upon our ability to find, attract, retain and motivate qualified individuals, including through competitive compensation packages, and upon the continued contributions of these people. Laws and regulations, including those contained in or relating to the EUs Capital Requirements Directive, those adopted under the AIFMD, those required to be adopted under the Dodd-Frank Act and certain provisions of the EUs UCITS V Directive, could impose restrictions on compensation paid by financial institutions, which could restrict our ability to compete effectively for qualified professionals. As our business grows, we are likely to need to increase correspondingly the overall number of individuals that we employ. Moreover, in order to retain certain key personnel, we may be required to increase compensation to such individuals, resulting in additional expense without a corresponding increase in potential revenues. There is no assurance that we will be successful in finding, attracting and retaining qualified individuals, and the departure of key investment personnel, in particular, if not replaced, could cause us to lose clients, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
Strong competition from numerous and sometimes larger companies with competing offerings and products could limit or reduce sales of our products, potentially resulting in a decline in our market share, revenues and income. We compete with numerous investment management companies, securities brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, banks and other financial institutions. Our investment products also compete with products offered by these competitors, as well as with real estate investment trusts, hedge funds and other products. The periodic establishment of new investment management companies and other competitors increases the competition that we face. At the same time, consolidation in the financial services industry has created stronger competitors with greater financial resources and broader distribution channels than our own. Competition is based on various factors, including, among others, business reputation, investment performance, product mix and offerings, service quality and innovation, distribution relationships, and fees charged. Further, although we may offer certain types of strategic beta and actively managed exchange-traded funds, to the extent that there is a trend among existing or potential clients in favor of lower-fee passive products such as index and other types of exchange-traded funds, it may favor our competitors who provide those products over active managers like us. Additionally, competing securities broker-dealers, whom we rely upon to distribute and sell certain of our funds and other investment products, may also sell their own proprietary funds and investment products, which could limit the distribution of our products. To the extent that existing or potential clients, including securities broker-dealers, decide to invest in or distribute the products of our competitors, the sales of our products as well as our market share, revenues and income could decline. Our ability to attract and retain AUM is also dependent on the relative investment performance of our SIPs, offering a mix of SIPs that meets investor demand and our ability to maintain our investment management fees and pricing structure at competitive levels.
Changes in the third-party distribution and sales channels on which we depend could reduce our income and hinder our growth. We derive nearly all of our fund sales through third-party broker-dealers, banks, investment advisers and other financial intermediaries. Increasing competition for these distribution channels and regulatory initiatives have caused our distribution costs to rise and could cause further increases in the future or could otherwise negatively impact the distribution of our products. Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC may establish different standards for broker-dealers in their interaction with retail customers, which could have an impact on sales and/or distribution costs. In addition, the SEC has proposed changes to Rule 12b-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act which, if adopted, could limit our ability to recover expenses relating to the distribution of our U.S.-registered funds. Higher distribution costs lower our income; consolidations in the broker-dealer industry could also adversely impact our income. Moreover, if several of the major financial advisers who distribute our products were to cease operations or limit or otherwise end the distribution of our products, it could have a significant adverse impact on our income. In April 2016, the DOL issued a new fiduciary rule that will subject financial professionals who provide investment advice to certain U.S. retirement clients to a new fiduciary duty intended to address conflicts of interests. We believe that the rule could significantly impact the ability of financial professionals to provide investment advice and recommendations for retirement accounts about funds for which they receive a fee from the fund or its affiliates. This rule may impact the compensation paid to the financial intermediaries who sell our funds to their retirement





2420

Table of Contents


clients and may negatively impact our business. Implementation of the rule will be phased in beginning in April 2017, and will generally become fully effective in January 2018. In addition, the U.K., the Netherlands, Sweden and the EU in MiFID II have adopted regimes which ban, or may limit, the payment of commissions and other inducements to intermediaries in relation to certain sales to retail customers in those jurisdictions, and similar regimes are under consideration in several other jurisdictions. Depending on their exact terms, such regimes may result in existing flows of business moving to less profitable channels or even to competitors providing substitutable products outside the regime. There is no assurance we will continue to have access to the third-party broker-dealers, banks, investment advisers and other financial intermediaries that currently distribute our products, or continue to have the opportunity to offer all or some of our existing products through them. A failure to maintain strong business relationships with such distributors may also impair our distribution and sales operations. Because we use broker-dealers, banks, investment advisers and other financial intermediaries to sell our products, we do not control the ultimate investment recommendations given to clients. Any inability to access and successfully sell our products to clients through third-party distribution channels could have a negative effect on our level of AUM, income and overall business and financial condition.
Our increasing focus on international markets as a source of investments and sales of investmentour products subjects us to increased exchange rate and market-specific political, economic or other risks that may adversely impact our revenues and income generated overseas. While we maintain a significant portion of our operations in the U.S., we also provide services and earn revenues in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Asia-Pacific, Canada, The Bahamas and Latin America. As a result, we are subject to foreign currency exchange risk through our non-U.S. operations. Fluctuations in the exchange rates to the U.S. dollar have affected, and may in the future affect, our financial results from one period to the next. While we have taken steps to reduce our exposure to foreign exchange risk, for example, by denominating a significant amount of our transactions in U.S. dollars, theour situation may change in the future as our business continues to grow outside the U.S.future. Appreciation of the U.S. dollar has and could continue toin the future moderate revenues from managing investmentour products internationally, or could affect relative investment performance of certain of our SIPsproducts invested in non-U.S. securities. In addition, we have risk associated with the foreign exchange revaluation of U.S. dollar balances held by certain non-U.S. subsidiaries for which the local currency is the functional currency. Separately, management fees that we earn tend to be higher in connection with non-U.S. AUM than with U.S. AUM. Consequently, downturns in international markets have in the past had, and could in the future have, a significant effect on our revenues and income. Moreover, our emerging market portfolios and revenues derived from managing these portfolios are subject to significant risks of loss from financial, economic, political and diplomatic developments, currency fluctuations, social instability, changes in governmental policies, expropriation, nationalization, asset confiscation and changes in legislation related to non-U.S. ownership. International trading markets, particularly in some emerging market countries, are often smaller, less liquid, less regulated and significantly more volatile than those in the U.S. As our business continues to grow in non-U.S. markets, any ongoing and future business, economic, political or social unrest affecting these markets, in addition to any direct consequences such unrest may have on our personnel and facilities located in the affected area, may also have a more lasting impact on the long-term investment climate in these and other areas and, as a result, our AUM and the corresponding revenues and income that we generate from them may be negatively affected.
HarmWe may review and pursue strategic transactions that could pose risks to our business. As part of our business strategy, we regularly consider, and have discussions with respect to, potential strategic transactions, including acquisitions, dispositions, consolidations, joint ventures or similar transactions, some of which may be deemed material. There can be no assurance that we will find suitable candidates for strategic transactions at acceptable prices, have sufficient capital resources to accomplish our strategy, or be successful in entering into agreements for desired transactions. In addition, such transactions typically involve a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges. Acquisitions and related transactions pose the risk that any business we acquire may lose customers or employees or could underperform relative to expectations. We could also experience financial or other setbacks if transactions encounter unanticipated problems, including problems related to execution or integration. Strategic transactions typically are announced publicly even though they may remain subject to numerous closing conditions, contingencies and approvals, and there is no assurance that any announced transaction will actually be consummated. Future transactions may also further increase our leverage or, if we issue equity securities to pay for acquisitions, dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders.
COMPETITION AND DISTRIBUTION RISKS
Strong competition from numerous and sometimes larger companies with competing offerings and products could limit or reduce sales of our products, potentially resulting in a decline in our market share, revenues and income. We compete with numerous investment management companies, securities brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, banks and other financial institutions. Our products also compete with products offered by these competitors, as well as with real estate investment trusts, hedge funds and other products. The periodic establishment of new investment management companies and other competitors increases the competition that we face. At the same time, consolidation in the financial services industry has created stronger competitors with greater financial resources and broader distribution channels than our own. Competition is based on various factors, including, among others, business reputation, investment performance, product mix and offerings, service quality and innovation, distribution relationships, and fees charged. Further, although we may offer certain types of exchange-traded funds, to the extent that there is a trend among existing or poorpotential clients in favor of lower fee index and other exchange-traded funds, it may favor our competitors who may offer such products that are more established or on a larger scale than we do. Additionally, competing securities broker-dealers and banks, upon which we rely to distribute and sell certain of our funds and other products, may also sell their own proprietary funds and products, which could limit the distribution of our products. To the extent that existing or potential clients, including securities broker-dealers, decide to invest in or distribute the products of our competitors, the sales of our products as well as our market share, revenues and income could decline. Our ability to attract and retain AUM is also dependent on the relative investment performance of our products, offering a mix of products and strategies that meets investor demands, and our ability to maintain our investment management fees and pricing structure at competitive levels.


21

Table of Contents

Increasing competition and other changes in the third-party distribution and sales channels on which we depend could reduce the levelour income and hinder our growth. We derive nearly all of our AUM or affect ourfund sales through third-party broker-dealers, banks, investment advisers and negatively impact our revenues and income. Our reputation is critical to the success of our business. We believe that our brand names have been, and continue to be, well received both in our industry and with our clients, reflecting the fact that our brands, like our business, are based in partother financial intermediaries. Because we rely on trust and confidence. If our reputation is harmed, existing clients may reduce amounts held in, or withdraw entirely from, our SIPs or our SIPs may terminate their management agreements with us, which could reduce the amount of our AUM and cause us to suffer a corresponding loss in our revenues and income. Our investment performance, along with achieving and maintaining superiorthird-party distribution and client service, is also criticalsales channels to sell our products, we do not control the success ofultimate investment recommendations given by them to clients. Increasing competition for these distribution and sales channels, and regulatory changes and initiatives, have caused our business. Strong investment performance often stimulates sales of our investment products. Poor investment performance as compareddistribution costs to third-party benchmarks or competitive products has in the pastrise and could cause further cost increases in the future, leador could otherwise negatively impact the distribution of our products. Higher distribution costs lower our income, and consolidations in the broker-dealer or banking industries could also adversely impact our income. A failure to maintain our third-party distribution and sales channels, or a decrease infailure to maintain strong business relationships with our distributors and other intermediaries, may impair our distribution and sales of investmentoperations.Any inability to access and successfully sell our products we manage and stimulate redemptions from existing products, generally lowering the overallto clients through such third-party channels could have a negative effect on our level of AUM and reducing the management fees we earn. Thereadversely impact our business.
Moreover, there is no assurance that pastwe will continue to have access to the third-party financial intermediaries that currently distribute our products, or present investment performancethat we will continue to have the opportunity to offer all or some of our existing products through them. If several of the major financial advisers that distribute our products were to cease operations or limit or otherwise end the distribution of our products, it could have a significant adverse impact on our income.
Further, the standards of conduct and disclosure and reporting requirements, with respect to fees, products, services and possible conflicts of interest, applicable to broker-dealers and other financial intermediaries in the U.S., remain subject to change and enhancement pursuant to business and regulatory developments and requirements, including with respect to investor suitability obligations, enhanced investor protections for retail customers, and increased compliance requirements.
In addition, the U.K., the Netherlands and the EU, through MiFID II, have adopted regimes that ban, or may limit, the payment of commissions and other inducements to intermediaries in relation to certain sales to retail customers in those jurisdictions, and similar regimes are under consideration in several other jurisdictions. Depending on their exact terms, such regimes may result in existing flows of business moving to less profitable channels or even to competitors providing substitutable products outside the regime. Arrangements with non-independent advisers will also be affected as narrower rules related to the requirement that commissions reflect an enhancement of the service to customers come into effect, along with a prescriptive list of permissible non-monetary benefits. The interpretation of the inducements rules has also resulted in major changes to how fund managers, including us, finance investment products we manage will be indicativeresearch with many firms, by opting to pay for third-party investment research for client accounts covered by MiFID II.
THIRD-PARTY RISKS
Any failure of future performance. Any poor investment performance may negativelyour third-party providers to fulfill their obligations, or our failure to maintain good relationships with our providers, could adversely impact our revenuesbusiness. We currently, and income. Reputational harmmay in the future, depend on a number of third-party providers to support various operational, administrative, market data, distribution, and other business needs of our company. In addition, we may, from time to time, transfer vendor contracts and services from one provider to another. If our third-party providers fail to deliver required services on a timely basis, or poor investment performance may cause us to lose current clients andif we experience other negative service quality or relationship issues with our providers, we may be unableexposed to continuesignificant costs and/or operational difficulties, and our ability to attract new clients or develop new business. Ifconduct and grow our business may be impaired. In addition, we failare in the process of outsourcing certain of our fund administration services for our funds to address, or appeara third-party provider. Such administrative and functional changes are costly and complex, and may expose us to failheightened operational risks. Any failure to address, successfullymitigate such risks could result in reputational harm to us, as well as financial losses to us and promptly the underlying causesour clients. The failure of any reputational harmkey provider or poor investment performance,vendor to fulfill its obligations to us could result in outcomes inconsistent with our or our clients’ objectives and requirements, result in legal liability and regulatory issues for us, and otherwise adversely impact us.
We may be adversely affected if any of our third-party providers is subject to a successful cyber or security attack. Due to our interconnectivity with third-party vendors, advisors, central agents, exchanges, clearing organizations and other financial institutions, we may be unsuccessfuladversely affected if any of them is subject to a successful cyber attack or other information security event, including those arising due to the use of mobile technology or a third-party cloud environment. Most of the software applications that we use in repairing any existing harm to our reputationbusiness are licensed from, and supported, upgraded and maintained by, third-party vendors. Our third-party applications include enterprise cloud storage and cloud computing application services provided and maintained by third-party vendors. Any breach, suspension or performancetermination of certain of these licenses or the related support, upgrades and maintenance could cause temporary system delays or interruption that could adversely impact our future business prospects would likely be affected.business. Our third-party applications may include confidential and proprietary data provided by vendors and by us.





2522

Table of Contents


Our future results are dependent upon maintaining an appropriate level of expenses, which is subject to fluctuation. The level of our expenses is subject to fluctuation and may increase for the following or other reasons: changes in the level and scope of our operating expenses in response to market conditions; variations in the level of total compensation expense due to, among other things, bonuses, merit increases and severance costs, changes in our employee count and mix, and competitive factors; and/or changes in expenses and capital costs, including costs incurred to maintain and enhance our administrative and operating services infrastructure or to cover uninsured losses, and an increase in insurance expenses including through the assumption of higher deductibles and/or co-insurance liability.TECHNOLOGY AND SECURITY RISKS
Our ability to successfully manage and grow our business successfully can be impeded by systems and other technological limitations. Our continued success in effectively managing and growing our business depends on our ability to integrate theour varied accounting, financial, information, and operational systems on a global basis. Moreover, adapting or developing the existing technology systems we use to meet our internal needs, as well as client needs, industry demands and new regulatory requirements, is also critical for our business. The introduction of new technologies presents new challenges to us. We have an ongoing need to continually upgrade and improve our various technology systems,continually, including our data processing, financial, accounting, shareholder servicing and trading systems. Further, we also must be proactive and prepared to implement new technology systems when growth opportunities present themselves, whether as a result of a business acquisition or rapidly increasing business activities in particular markets or regions. These needs could present operational issues or require from time to time, significant capital spending. It alsospending, and may require us to reevaluate the current value and/or expected useful lives of the technology systems we use, which could negatively impact our results of operations. In addition, technology is subject to rapid advancements and changes and our competitors may, from time to time, implement newer technologies or more advanced platforms for their services and products, including digital advisers and other advanced electronic systems, which could adversely affect our business if we are unable to remain competitive.
Any significant limitation, failure or security breach of our information and cyber security infrastructure, software applications, technology or other systems that are critical to our operations could disrupt our business and harm our operations and reputation. We are highly dependent upon the use of various proprietary and third-party information and security technology, software applications and other technology systems to operate our business. We are also dependent on the continuity and effectiveness of our information and cyber security infrastructure, management oversight and reporting framework, policies, procedures and capabilities to protect our computer and telecommunications systems and the data that reside on or are transmitted through them and contracted third-party systems. We use technology on a daily basis in our business to, among other things, support our business continuity and operations, process and transmit confidential communications, store and maintain data, obtain securities pricing information, process client transactions, and provide reports and other customer services to our clients. Any disruptions, inaccuracies, delays, theft, systems failures, data security or privacy breaches, or cyber or other security breaches in these and other processes could subject us to significant client dissatisfaction and losses, and damage our reputation. We have been, and expect to continue to be, the subject of these types of breaches and/or attacks, from time to time. Although we take protective measures, including measures to secure and protect information through system security technology and our internal security procedures, there can be no assurance that any of these measures will prove effective. The technology systems we use remain vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses, potential human errors and other events and circumstances that have a security impact, such as an external or internal hacker attack by one or more cyber criminals (including through the use of phishing attacks, malware, ransomware and other methods and activities maliciously designed to obtain and exploit confidential information and to cause damage) or an authorized employee or vendor inadvertently or recklessly causing us to release confidential information, which could materially harm our operations and reputation.
Potential system disruptions, failures or breaches of the technology we use or the security infrastructure we rely upon, and the costs necessary to address them, could result in: (i) significant material financial loss or costs, (ii) the unauthorized disclosure or modification of sensitive or confidential client and business information, (iii) loss of valuable information, (iv) breach of client and vendor contracts, (v) liability for stolen assets, information or identity, (vi) remediation costs to repair damage caused by the failure or breach, (vii) additional security and organizational costs to mitigate against future incidents, (viii) reputational harm, (ix) loss of confidence in our business and products, (x) liability for failure to review and disclose applicable incidents or provide relevant updated disclosure properly and timely, (xi) regulatory investigations or actions, and/or (xii) legal claims, litigation, and liability costs. Moreover, loss or unauthorized disclosure or transfer of confidential and proprietary data or confidential customer identification information could further harm our reputation and subject us to liability under laws that protect confidential data and personal information, resulting in increased costs or a decline in our revenues or common stock price. Further, although we take precautions to password protect and encrypt our laptops and sensitive information on our other mobile electronic devices, if such devices are stolen, misplaced or left unattended, they may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use, creating a possible security risk, which may require us to incur additional administrative costs and/or take remedial actions. In addition, the failure to manage and operate properly the data centers we use could have an adverse impact on our business. Although we have in place certain disaster recovery plans, we may experience system delays and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, power failures, acts of war, and third-party failures.


23

Table of Contents

Our inability to recover successfully, recover should we experience a disaster or other business continuity problem, could cause material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, legal liability, and/or reputational harm, or legal liability.harm. Should we experience a local or regional disaster or other business continuity problem, such as an earthquake, hurricane, tsunami, terrorist attack, pandemic or other natural or man-made disaster, our continued success will depend, in part, on the safety and availability of our personnel, our office facilities and infrastructure, and the proper functioning of our technology, computer, telecommunication and other systems and operations that are critical to our business. While our operational size, the diversity of locations from which we operate, and our redundantvarious back-up systems provide us with an advantage, should we experience a local or regional disaster or other business continuity event, we could still experience operational challenges, in particular depending upon how such a local or regional event may affect our human capitalpersonnel across our operations or with regard to particular aspects of our operations, such as key executive officersexecutives or personnel in our technology group.groups. Moreover, as we grow our operations in new geographic regions, the potential for particular types of natural or man-made disasters;disasters, political, economic or infrastructure instabilities;instabilities, information, technology or security limitations or breaches;breaches, or other country- or region-specific business continuity risks increases. Past disaster recovery efforts have demonstrated that even seemingly localized events may require broader disaster recovery efforts throughout our operations and, consequently, we regularly assess and take steps to improve upon our existing business continuity plans and key management succession.plans. However, a disaster on a significant scale or affecting certain of our key operating areas within or across regions, or our inability to recover successfully recover should we experiencefollowing a disaster or other business continuity problem, could materially interruptadversely impact our business and operations.
HUMAN CAPITAL RISKS
We depend on key personnel and our financial performance could be negatively affected by the loss of their services. The success of our business will continue to depend upon our key personnel, including our portfolio and fund managers, investment analysts, investment advisers, sales and management personnel and other professionals as well as our executive officers and business unit heads. Competition for qualified, motivated, and highly-skilled executives, professionals and other key personnel in the investment management industry remains significant. Our success depends to a substantial degree upon our ability to find, attract, retain and motivate qualified individuals, including through competitive compensation packages, and upon the continued contributions of these people. Global and/or local laws and regulationscould impose restrictions on compensation paid by financial institutions, which could restrict our ability to compete effectively for qualified professionals. As our business develops, we may need to increase the number of individuals that we employ. Moreover, in order to retain certain key personnel, we may be required to increase compensation to such individuals and increase our key management succession planning, resulting in additional expense without a corresponding increase in potential revenues. There is no assurance that we will be successful in finding, attracting and retaining qualified individuals, and the departure of key investment personnel, in particular, if not replaced, could cause us to lose clients, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. In addition, due to the global nature of our business, our key personnel may, from time to time, have reasons to travel to regions susceptible to higher risk of civil unrest, organized crime or terrorism, and we may be unable to ensure the safety of our personnel traveling to such regions.
EXPENSE AND CASH MANAGEMENT RISKS
Our future results are dependent upon maintaining an appropriate expense level.The level of our expenses is subject to fluctuation and may increase for the following or other reasons: (i) changes in the level and scope of our operating expenses in response to market conditions or regulations, (ii) variations in the level of total compensation expense due to, among other things, bonuses, merit increases and severance costs, (iii) changes in our employee count and mix, and competitive factors, (iv) changes in expenses and capital costs, including costs incurred to maintain and enhance our administrative and operating services infrastructure or to cover uninsured losses, and (v) increases in insurance expenses, including through the assumption of higher deductibles and/or co-insurance liability.
Our ability to meet cash needs depends upon certain factors, including the market value of our assets, our operating cash flows and our perceived creditworthiness.If we are unable to obtain cash, financing or access to the capital markets in a timely manner, we may be forced to incur unanticipated costs or revise our business plans, and our business could be adversely impacted. Further, our access to the capital markets depends significantly on our credit ratings. A reduction in our long- or short-term credit ratings could increase our borrowing costs and limit our access to the capital markets. Volatility in the global financing markets may also impact our ability to access the capital markets should we seek to do so, and may have an adverse effect on investors willingness to purchase our securities, interest rates, credit spreads and/or the valuation levels of equity markets.


24

Table of Contents

We are dependent on the earnings of our subsidiaries. Substantially all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As a result, our cash flow and our ability to fund operations are dependent upon the earnings of our subsidiaries and the distribution of earnings, loans or other payments by our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation to fund our payment obligations, whether by dividends, distributions, loans or other payments. Any payments to us by our subsidiaries could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions and are contingent upon our subsidiaries earnings and business considerations. Certain of our subsidiaries are subject to regulatory restrictions that may limit their ability to transfer assets to their parent companies. Our financial condition could be adversely affected if certain of our subsidiaries are unable to distribute assets to us.
LEGAL AND REGULATORY RISKS
We are subject to extensive, complex, overlapping and frequently changing rules, regulations, policies, and legal interpretations.There is uncertainty associated with the regulatory and compliance environments in which we operate. Our business is subject to extensive and complex, overlapping and/or conflicting, and frequently changing and increasing rules, regulations, policies and legal interpretations, around the world. Political and electoral changes, developments and conflicts have in the past introduced, and may in the future introduce, additional uncertainty. Our regulatory and compliance obligations impose significant operational and cost burdens on us and cover a broad range of requirements related to financial reporting and other disclosure matters, securities and other financial instruments, investment and advisory matters, accounting, tax, compensation, ethics, data protection, privacy, sanctions programs, and escheatment requirements. We may be adversely affected by a failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and changes in the countries in which we operate. For a more extensive discussion of the laws, regulations and regulators to which we are subject, see “Item 1 - Business - Regulation” included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.
We may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations or by changes in the interpretation of existing laws and regulations. The laws and regulations applicable to our business generally involve restrictions and requirements in connection with a variety of technical, specialized, and expanding matters and concerns. Over the years, the U.S. federal corporate governance and securities laws have been augmented substantially and made significantly more complex by various legislation. As we continue to address our legal and regulatory requirements or focus on meeting new or expanded requirements, we may need to expend a substantial amount of additional time, costs and resources.Regulatory reforms may add further complexity to our business and operations and could require us to alter our investment management services and related activities, which could be costly, impede our growth and adversely impact our AUM, revenues and income. Regulatory reforms also may impact our clients, which could cause them to change their investment strategies or allocations in a manner adverse to our business. Certain key regulatory reforms in the U.S. that impact or relate to our business, and may cause us to incur additional obligations, include:
Dodd-Frank. In July 2010, Dodd-Frank was adopted in the U.S. Dodd-Frank is expansive in scope and has required the adoption of extensive regulations and the issuance of numerous regulatory decisions, while certain proposed rules remain subject to final adoption.
Systemically Important Financial Institutions. Dodd-Frank authorized the establishment of the FSOC, the mandate of which is to identify and respond to threats to U.S. financial stability. Similarly, the U.S. and other members of the G-20 group of nations have empowered the FSB to identify and respond, in a coordinated manner, to threats to global financial stability. To the extent that we or any of our funds are designated as SIFIs by the FSOC or as global SIFIs by the FSB, such designations add additional supervision and/or regulation, which could include requirements related to risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity, credit exposure, stress testing, resolution plans, early remediation, and certain risk management requirements, that could impact our business.
Derivatives and Other Financial Products. Dodd-Frank, as well as other legislation and regulations, impose restrictions and limitations on us related to our financial services and products, resulting in increased scrutiny and oversight. Under Dodd-Frank’s regulations governing derivative transactions, certain categories of swaps are required to be submitted for clearing by a regulated clearing organization and reported on a swap execution facility. The EU and other countries have implemented, or are in the process of implementing, similar requirements. There is some risk that full mutual recognition may not be achieved between the various regulators, which may cause us to incur duplicate regulation and transaction costs. The SEC has also proposed a rule that would impose restrictions on the use of derivatives by registered funds. In addition, SEC rules have changed the structure and operation for certain types of money market funds, and certain U.S.-registered funds are required to adopt liquidity management programs.


25

Table of Contents

Privacy and Data Protection. There also has been increased regulation with respect to the protection of customer privacy and data, and the need to secure sensitive customer, employee and others’ information. As the regulatory focus on privacy continues to intensify and laws and regulations concerning the management of personal data expand, risks related to privacy and data collection within our business will increase. In addition to the EU’s GDPR data protection rules, we may also be or become subject to or affected by additional country, federal and state laws, regulations and guidance impacting consumer privacy, such as the recently enacted CCPA effective January 2020, which provides for enhanced consumer protections for California residents and statutory fines for data security breaches or other CCPA violations. Noncompliance with our legal obligations relating to privacy and data protection could result in penalties, legal proceedings by governmental entities or affected individuals, and significant legal and financial exposure.
Rule 12b-1 Plans. In 2010, the SEC proposed changes to Rule 12b-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act that, if adopted, could limit our ability to recover expenses relating to the distribution of our U.S.-registered funds, which could decrease our revenues.
SEC Regulation Best Interest. In June 2019, the SEC adopted a package of new rules, amendments and interpretations, including Regulation Best Interest and a new form of relationship summary, designed to enhance investor protections for all retail customers, that will, subject to a transition period until June 30, 2020, among other things: (i) require broker-dealers to act in the best interest of their retail customers when recommending securities and account types, (ii) raise the broker-dealer standard of conduct beyond existing suitability obligations, and (iii) require a new relationship summary disclosure document to inform retail clients of the nature of the broker-dealers’ relationships with investment professionals and registered investment advisers, including a description of services offered, the legal standards of conduct that apply to each, the fees a client might pay, and conflicts of interest that may exist.
Other Compliance Requirements. Compliance with the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, the U.S. Patriot Act of 2001, and anti-money laundering and economic sanctions, both domestically and internationally, has taken on heightened importance as a result of efforts to, among other things, combat terrorist financing and actions that undermine the stability, sovereignty and territorial integrity of countries. In addition, global regulatory, federal and/or state anti-takeover or business combination laws may impose various disclosure and procedural requirements on a person seeking to acquire control of us, which may discourage potential merger and acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control, including through transactions that some stockholders may consider desirable.
The impacts of these and other regulatory reforms on us, now and in the future, could be significant. We expect that the regulatory requirements and developments applicable to us will cause us to continue to incur additional compliance and administrative burdens and costs. Any inability to meet applicable requirements within the required timeframes may subject us to sanctions or other restrictions by governments and/or regulators that could adversely impact our broader business objectives.
Global regulatory and legislative actions and reforms have made the regulatory environment in which we operate more costly and future actions and reforms could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.As in the U.S., regulatory and legislative actions outside the U.S. have been augmented substantially and made more complex, by measures such as the EU’s Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive and MiFID II. Further, ongoing changes in the EU’s regulatory framework applicable to our business, including changes related toBrexit and any other changes in the composition of the EU’s member states, may add further complexity to our global risks and operations. Moreover, the adoption of new laws, regulations or standards and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws, regulations or standards have directly affected, and will continue to affect, our business. With new laws and changes in interpretation of existing requirements, the associated time we must dedicate to and related costs we must incur in meeting the regulatory complexities of our business have increased. We may be required to invest significant additional management time and resources to address new regulations being adopted pursuant to MiFID II and other laws. For example, MiFID II requires the “unbundling” of research and execution charges for trading. The industry’s response to the unbundling rules is still evolving and could lead to increased research costs. Outlays associated with meeting regulatory complexities have also increased as we expand our business into new jurisdictions.


26

Table of Contents

As of May 2018, the EU’s GDPR strengthened and unified data protection rules for individuals within the EU. GDPR also addresses export of personal data outside the EU. The primary objectives of GDPR are to give citizens control of their personal data and to simplify the regulatory environment for international business by unifying data protection regulation within the EU. Compliance with the stringent data protection rules under GDPR requires an extensive review of all of our global data processing systems. The failure to comply properly with GDPR rules on a timely basis and to maintain ongoing compliance with such rules may subject us to enforcement proceedings and significant fines and costs. For example, a failure to comply with GDPR could result in fines up to 20 million Euros or 4% of our annual global revenues, whichever is higher.
Compliance activities to address these and other new legal requirements have required, and will continue to require, us to expend additional time and resources, and, consequently, we are incurring increased costs of doing business, which potentially negatively impacts our profitability and future financial results. Finally, any further regulatory and legislative actions and reforms affecting the investment management industry, including compliance initiatives, may negatively impact revenues by increasing our costs of accessing or operating in financial markets or by making certain investment offerings less favorable to our clients.

Failure to comply with the laws, rules or regulations in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate could result in substantial harm to our reputation and results of operations. As with all investment management companies, our activities are highly regulated in almost all countries in which we conduct business. Failure to comply with the applicable laws, rules, regulations, codes, directives, notices or guidelines in any of our jurisdictions could result in civil liability, criminal liability and/or sanctions against us, including fines, censures, injunctive relief, the suspension or expulsion from a particular jurisdiction or market, or the revocation of licenses or charters, any of which could adversely affect our reputation and operations. Moreover, any potential accounting or reporting error, whether financial or otherwise, if material, could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business. While management has focused attention and resources on our compliance policies, procedures and practices, the regulatory environments of the jurisdictions where we conduct our business, or where our products are organized or sold, are complex, uncertain and subject to change. Local regulatory environments may vary widely and place additional demands on our sales, investment, legal and compliance personnel. In recent years, the regulatory environments in which we operate have seen significant increased and evolving regulations, which have imposed and may continue to impose additional compliance and operational requirements and costs on us in the applicable jurisdictions. Regulators could also change their policies or laws in a manner that might restrict or otherwise impede our ability to offer our services and products in their respective markets, or we may be unable to keep up with, or adapt to, the ever changing, complex regulatory requirements in such jurisdictions or markets, which could further negatively impact our business.
Changes in tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a material impact on our financial loss, losscondition, results of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm,operations and liquidity. We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, and are subject to ongoing tax audits, in various jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and assess additional taxes. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision. However, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the actual outcomes could have a material impact on our net income or financial condition. Changes in tax laws or tax rulings may at times materially impact our effective tax rate.
The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes various changes to the tax law, including a permanent reduction in the corporate income tax rate and one-time transition tax on certain non-U.S. earnings. Further, pursuant to ongoing efforts to encourage global tax compliance, the OECD has adopted CRS, aimed at ensuring that persons with financial assets located outside of their tax residence country pay required taxes. In many cases, intergovernmental agreements between the participating countries will govern implementation of the new CRS rules. CRS is being implemented over a multi-year period and we will continue to monitor the implementing regulations and corresponding intergovernmental agreements to determine our requirements. CRS may subject us to additional reporting, compliance and administrative costs, and burdens in jurisdictions where we operate as a qualifying financial institution.
The OECD has also undertaken a new project focused on “Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalization of the Economy.” This project may impact all multinational businesses by allocating a greater share of taxing rights to countries where consumers are located regardless of the current physical presence of a business, and by implementing a global minimum tax. There is significant uncertainty regarding such proposal and any unfavorable resolution could have an adverse effect on our effective tax rate.


27

Table of Contents

Our contractual obligations may subject us to indemnification costs and liability to third parties. In the ordinary course of business, we and our subsidiaries enter into contracts with third parties, including, without limitation, clients, vendors, and other service providers, that contain a variety of representations and warranties and that provide for indemnifications by us in certain circumstances. Pursuant to such contractual arrangements, we may be subject to indemnification costs and liability to third parties if, for example, we breach any material obligations under the agreements or agreed standards of care, or in the event such third parties have certain legal liability.claims asserted against them. The terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract, and future indemnification claims against us could negatively impact our financial condition.
Regulatory and governmental examinations and/or investigations, litigation and the legal risks associated with our business, could adversely impact our AUM, increase costs and negatively impact our profitability and/or our future financial results. From time to time, we may receive and respond to regulatory and governmental requests for documents or other information, fromsubpoenas, examinations and investigations in connection with our business activities. In addition, regulatory or governmental authorities or regulatory bodies. We may also become the subject of governmental or regulatory investigations and/or examinations or governmental or regulatory investigations and/or examinations that have been inactive could become active. In addition, from time to time, we may beare named as a party in litigation. We may be obligated, and under our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and standard form of director indemnification agreement we are obligated under certain conditions, or we may choose, to indemnify directors, officers or employees against liabilities and expenses they may incur in connection with such matters to the extent permitted under applicable law. Even if claims made against us are without merit, litigation typically is an expensive process. Risks associated with legal liability often are difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude can remain unknown for significant periods of time. Eventual exposures from and expenses incurred relating to any examinations, investigations, litigation, investigations, examinations andand/or settlements could adversely impact our AUM, increase costs and/or negatively impact our profitability and financial results. Judgments,Allegations, findings or allegationsjudgments of wrongdoing by regulatory or governmental authorities or in litigation against us, or settlements with respect thereto, could affect our reputation, increase our costs of doing business and/or negatively impact our revenues, any of which could have a material negative impact on our financial results.



26

Table of Contents

Our ability to meet cash needs depends upon certain factors, including the market value of our assets, operating cash flows and our perceived creditworthiness. Our ability to meet anticipated cash needs depends upon factors such as the market value of our assets, our operating cash flows and our creditworthiness as perceived by lenders. If we are unable to obtain cash, financing or access to the capital markets in a timely manner, we may be forced to incur unanticipated costs or revise our business plans, and our business could be adversely impacted. Further, our access to the capital markets depends significantly on our credit ratings. A reduction in our long- or short-term credit ratings could increase our borrowing costs and limit our access to the capital markets. Volatility in the global financing markets may also impact our ability to access the capital markets should we seek to do so, and may have an adverse effect on investors willingness to purchase our securities, interest rates, credit spreads and/or the valuation levels of equity markets.
We are dependent on the earnings of our subsidiaries. Substantially all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As a result, our cash flow and our ability to fund operations are dependent upon the earnings of our subsidiaries and the distribution of earnings, loans or other payments by our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation to fund our payment obligations, whether by dividends, distributions, loans or other payments. Any payments to us by our subsidiaries could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions and are contingent upon our subsidiaries earnings and business considerations. Certain of our subsidiaries are subject to regulatory restrictions which may limit their ability to transfer assets to their parent companies and/or our ability to repatriate assets to the U.S. Our financial condition could be adversely affected if certain of our subsidiaries are unable to distribute assets to us.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2.Properties.
We conduct our worldwide operations using a combination of leasedowned and ownedleased facilities. While we believe we have sufficientour facilities are suitable and adequate to conduct our business at present, we will continue to acquire, lease acquire and dispose of facilities throughout the world as necessary.
We own our San Mateo, California corporate headquarters and various other office buildings in the U.S. and internationally. We lease excess owned space to third parties under leases with terms through 2029. Our owned properties consist of the following:
Location 
Owned Square
Footage
 
Owned Square
Footage Leased
to Third Parties
San Mateo, California 743,793
 315,590
St. Petersburg, Florida 560,948
 301,716
Rancho Cordova, California 445,023
 62,660
Hyderabad, India 379,052
 
Poznan, Poland 284,436
 
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 102,246
 20,264
Other 108,383
 13,641
Total 2,623,881
 713,871

We lease office space in variousnine states in the U.S., including California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Utah and Washington, D.C., and internationally, including, without limitation, in various non-U.S. locations, including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, the PeoplesPeople’s Republic of China (including Hong Kong), Colombia, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Isle of Man, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and the U.K. (including England and Scotland) and Vietnam. As of September 30, 20162019, we leased and occupied approximately 1,155,0001,133,000 square feet of space. We have also leasedoffice space worldwide, and subsequently subleased to third parties approximately 22,00013,000 square feet of excess leased space.
In addition, we own buildings in San Mateo, Rancho Cordova and Stockton, California; St. Petersburg and Ft. Lauderdale, Florida; Hyderabad, India; and Nassau, The Bahamas, as well as space in office buildings in Argentina, India and Singapore. The buildings we own consist of approximately 2,118,000 square feet of space. We have leased to third parties approximately 389,000 square feet of excess owned space.

28

Table of Contents

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.
The information set forth in response to this Item 3 of Regulation S-K under “Legal Proceedings” is incorporated by reference from the “Legal Proceedings” section in Note 1114 – Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K,10‑K, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, theThe following description of our executive officers is included as an unnumbered item in Part I of this report in lieu of being included in our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders. Set forth below are the name, age, present title, and certain other information for each of our executive officers



27

Table of Contents

as of November 14, 201612, 2019. Each executive officer is appointed by Franklin’s Board of Directors and holds his/her office until the earlier of his/her death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal.
Vijay C. Advani
Age 55
Co-President of Franklin since October 2015; formerly, Executive Vice President–Global Advisory Services of Franklin from March 2011 to September 2015, Executive Vice President–Global Distribution of Franklin from June 2008 to March 2011, and Executive Vice President–Global Advisor Services of Franklin from December 2005 to June 2008; officer and/or director of certain subsidiaries of Franklin.
Gregory E. Johnson
Age 5558
Chairman of the Board of Franklin since June 2013 and Chief Executive Officer of Franklin since January 2004; formerly, President of Franklin from December 1999 to September 2015; officer and/or director of certain subsidiaries of Franklin; director or trustee of 4442 funds registered as investment companies managed or advised by subsidiaries of Franklin.
Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.
Age 79
Vice Chairman of Franklin since December 1999 and director of Franklin since 1969; officer and/or director of certain subsidiaries of Franklin; director or trustee of 40 funds registered as investment companies managed or advised by subsidiaries of Franklin.
Jennifer M. Johnson
Age 5255
President of Franklin since December 2016 and Chief Operating Officer since February 2017; formerly, Co-President of Franklin sincefrom October 2015; formerly,2015 to December 2016, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Franklin from March 2010 to September 2015, Executive Vice President–Operations and Technology of Franklin from December 2005 to March 2010, and Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Franklin from May 2003 to December 2005; officer and/or director of certain subsidiaries of Franklin; director or trustee of certain funds registered as investment companies managed or advised by subsidiaries of Franklin.
Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.Matthew Nicholls
Age 76
Vice Chairman of Franklin since December 1999 and director of Franklin since 1969; officer and/or director of certain subsidiaries of Franklin; director or trustee of 40 registered investment companies managed or advised by subsidiaries of Franklin.
Kenneth A. Lewis
Age 5547
Executive Vice President of Franklin since October 2007 and Chief Financial Officer of Franklin since October 2006;May 2019; formerly, Senior Vice Presidentwith Citigroup, Inc. (a financial services firm) from 1995 to May 2019, as Managing Director, Global Head of Financial Institutions, Corporate Banking, and TreasurerGlobal Head of FranklinAsset Management, Corporate and Investment Banking, from October2017 to May 2019, as Managing Director, Co-Head, Financial Institutions Corporate and Investment Banking, North America, and Global Head of Asset Management, Corporate and Investment Banking, from 2014 to 2017, as Managing Director, Co-Head, Financial Institutions Corporate and Investment Banking from 2011 to 2014, as Managing Director and Co-Head of Financial Institutions Corporate Banking from 2007 to 2011, and as Managing Director and Co-Head of Asset Management Banking from 2006 to October 2007, Vice President–Enterprise Risk Management of Franklin from April 2006 to October 2006 and Vice President and Treasurer of Franklin from June 2002 to April 2006;2007; officer and/or director of certain subsidiaries of Franklin.Franklin since June 2019.


29

Table of Contents

Craig S. Tyle
Age 5659
Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Franklin since August 2005; formerly, a partner at Shearman & Sterling LLP (a law firm) from March 2004 to July 2005 and General Counsel for the Investment Company Institute (a trade group for the U.S. fund industry) from September 1997 through March 2004; officer and/or director of certain subsidiaries of Franklin; officer of certain funds registered as investment companies managed or advised by subsidiaries of Franklin.
Jed A. Plafker
Age 48
Executive Vice President of Franklin since April 2019, formerly, Senior Vice President from June 2018 to April 2019; officer and/or director of various subsidiaries of Franklin for more than the past five years, including, for example, as Executive Vice President of Franklin Templeton Institutional, LLC since April 2009, President and director of Templeton Institutional, Inc. since September 2009, and President since February 2017 and director since December 2016 of Templeton Worldwide, Inc.
Gwen L. Shaneyfelt
Age 57
Chief Accounting Officer of Franklin since April 2019; officer and/or director of various subsidiaries of Franklin for more than the past five years, including, for example, as Director of Franklin Templeton Fund Management Limited since May 2019, Manager of Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l. since November 2013, and Senior Vice President of Franklin Templeton Companies, LLC since March 2011.
Alok Sethi
Age 58
Officer and/or director of various investment adviser, operations, and technology related subsidiaries of Franklin for more than the past five years, including, for example, as Senior Vice President of Franklin Advisers, Inc., Franklin Templeton Institutional, LLC and Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC since July 2014, Vice President of FASA, LLC since June 2014, and Vice President of Franklin Templeton Companies, LLC since June 2010.
Family Relationships
Gregory E. Johnson is the nephew of Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. and the brother of Charles E. Johnson (a director of Franklin) and Jennifer M. Johnson. Charles E. Johnson is the nephew of Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. and the brother of Gregory E. Johnson and Jennifer M. Johnson. Jennifer M. Johnson is the niece of Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. and the sister of Gregory E. Johnson and Charles E. Johnson.





2830

Table of Contents



PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “BEN.” On September 30, 2016, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE was $35.57 per share. At October 31, 2016,2019, there were 3,2872,805 stockholders of record of our common stock.
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for our common stock on the NYSE for each quarterly period of the two most recently completed fiscal years:
Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Fiscal Year 2015
 High Low High Low
October-December $42.23
 $34.62
 $59.43
 $49.12
January-March $39.94
 $31.00
 $55.91
 $50.49
April-June $41.24
 $30.56
 $52.76
 $48.69
July-September $36.99
 $31.59
 $49.96
 $36.15
We declared regular cash dividends of $0.72 per share ($0.18 per share per quarter) in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 (“fiscal year 2016”). We declared regular cash dividends of $0.60 per share ($0.15 per share per quarter) and a special cash dividend of $0.50 per share in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 (“fiscal year 2015”). We currently expect to continue paying comparable regular cash dividends on a quarterly basis to holders of our common stock depending upon earnings and other relevant factors.
The equity compensation plan information called for by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is set forth in Item 12 of Part III of this Form 10-K under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”
The following table provides information with respect to the shares of our common stock that we repurchased during the three months ended September 30, 20162019.
Month 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
 Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 2016 979,592
 $33.98
 979,592
 56,903,314
August 2016 3,137,858
 $36.21
 3,137,858
 53,765,456
September 2016 3,080,527
 $35.49
 3,080,527
 50,684,929
Total 7,197,977
   7,197,977
  
Month 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
As Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
 
Maximum
Number of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs
July 2019 971,064
 $34.52
 971,064
 51,792,521
August 2019 3,157,049
 27.97
 3,157,049
 48,635,472
September 2019 1,459,653
 28.48
 1,459,653
 47,175,819
Total 5,587,766
   5,587,766
  


Under our stock repurchase program, which is not subject to an expiration date, we can repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time in the open market and in private transactions in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation applicable federal securities laws. In order to pay taxes due in connection with the vesting of employee and executive officer stock and stock unit awards, we may repurchase shares under our program using a net stock issuance method. In June 2016 and October 2015,April 2018, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 50.0 million and 30.080.0 million additional shares of our common stock under the stock repurchase program. At September 30, 2016, 50.7 million shares remained available for repurchase under the program, which is not subject to an expiration date. There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during fiscal years 2016 and 2015.





2931

Table of Contents


Item 6.Selected Financial Data.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
as of and for the fiscal years ended September 30,
 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Summary of Operations (in millions)
                    
Operating revenues $6,618.0
 $7,948.7
 $8,491.4
 $7,985.0
 $7,101.0
 $5,774.5
 $6,319.1
 $6,392.2
 $6,618.0
 $7,948.7
Operating income 2,365.7
 3,027.6
 3,221.2
 2,921.3
 2,515.2
 1,557.4
 2,118.6
 2,264.3
 2,365.7
 3,027.6
Operating margin 35.7% 38.1% 37.9% 36.6% 35.4% 27.0% 33.5% 35.4% 35.7% 38.1%
Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. 1,726.7
 2,035.3
 2,384.3
 2,150.2
 1,931.4
Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc.1,195.7
1 
764.4
2 
1,696.7
 1,726.7
 2,035.3
Financial Data (in millions)
                    
Total assets $16,098.8
 $16,335.7
 $16,357.1
 $15,390.3
 $14,751.5
 $14,532.2
 $14,383.5
 $17,534.0
 $16,098.8
 $16,335.7
Debt 1,401.2
 1,348.0
 1,198.2
 1,197.7
 1,566.1
 696.9
 695.9
 1,044.2
 1,401.2
 1,348.0
Debt of consolidated sponsored investment products and variable interest entities 682.2
 807.3
 950.8
 1,097.4
 1,211.1
Debt of consolidated investment products 50.8
 32.6
 53.4
 682.2
 807.3
Franklin Resources, Inc. stockholders’ equity 11,935.8
 11,841.0
 11,584.1
 10,073.1
 9,201.3
 9,906.5
 9,899.2
 12,620.0
 11,935.8
 11,841.0
Operating cash flows 1,727.7
 2,252.0
 2,138.0
 2,035.7
 1,066.2
 201.6
 2,229.7
 1,135.4
 1,727.7
 2,252.0
Investing cash flows 192.2
 248.9
 390.6
 232.9
 873.4
 (1,077.1) (290.4) 52.0
 192.2
 248.9
Financing cash flows (1,800.7) (1,612.2) (1,195.3) (2,018.1) (1,084.9) (40.5) (3,761.7) (956.0) (1,800.7) (1,612.2)
Assets Under Management (in billions)
                    
Ending $733.3
 $770.9
 $898.0
 $844.7
 $749.9
 $692.6
 $717.1
 $753.2
 $733.3
 $770.9
Average1
 749.3
 869.5
 887.9
 808.2
 705.7
Per Common Share2
          
Average 3
 697.0
 740.5
 736.9
 749.3
 869.5
Per Common Share          
Earnings                    
Basic $2.94
 $3.29
 $3.79
 $3.37
 $2.99
 $2.35
 $1.39
 $3.01
 $2.94
 $3.29
Diluted 2.94
 3.29
 3.79
 3.37
 2.98
 2.35
 1.39
 3.01
 2.94
 3.29
Cash dividends declared 0.72
 1.10
 0.48
 1.39
 1.03
 1.04
 3.92
 0.80
 0.72
 1.10
Book value 20.93
 19.62
 18.60
 15.97
 14.45
 19.84
 19.07
 22.74
 20.93
 19.62
Employee Headcount 9,059
 9,489
 9,266
 9,002
 8,558
 9,597
 9,748
 9,386
 9,059
 9,489
__________________ 
1 
Includes an income tax charge of $86.0 million due to a revision to the estimated income tax charge that was recognized in fiscal year 2018 resulting from enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“the Tax Act”).
2
Includes an estimated income tax charge of $968.8 million resulting from enactment of the Tax Act.
3
Represents simple monthly average AUM.
2
All per share amounts for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012 have been adjusted retroactively to reflect a three-for-one split of common stock distributed to common stockholders in the form of a stock dividend in July 2013.








3032

Table of Contents


Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with the “Forward-looking Statements” sectiondisclosure set forth in Part I and the “Risk Factors” section set forth in Item 1A of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K and in any more recent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), each of which describe these risks, uncertainties and other important factors in more detail.
OVERVIEW
We are a global investment management organization and derive our operating revenues and net income from providing investment management and related services to investors in jurisdictions worldwide throughfor investors in our investment products, thatwhich include investmentour sponsored funds, as well as institutional and institutional, high net-worth and separately-managed accounts (collectively, our “sponsored investment products” or “SIPs”).high-net-worth separate accounts. In addition to investment management, our services include fund administration, sales and distribution marketing,and shareholder servicing,servicing. We may perform services directly or through third parties. We offer our services and other fiduciary services. Our SIPs and investment management and related services are distributed or marketed to investors globallyproducts under nineour various distinct brand names:names, including, but not limited to, Franklin®, Templeton®, Balanced Equity Management®, Benefit Street Partners®, Darby®, Edinburgh Partners™, Fiduciary Trust™, Franklin Bissett®, Franklin Mutual Series®, Franklin BissettK2®, Fiduciary Trust™, Darby and LibertyShares®, Balanced Equity Management®, K2® and LibertyShares™. We offer a broad rangeproduct mix of SIPs under equity, hybrid,multi-asset/balanced, fixed income and cash management fundsinvestment objectives and accounts, including alternative investment products, thatsolutions which meet a wide variety of specific investment goals and needs offor individual and institutional investors. We also provide sub-advisory services to certain investment products sponsored by other companies which may be sold to investors under the brand names of those other companies or on a co-branded basis.
The level of our revenues depends largely on the level and relative mix of assets under management (“AUM”). As noted in the “Risk Factors” section set forth above in Item 1A of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,10‑K, the amount and mix of our AUM are subject to significant fluctuations and can negatively impact our revenues and income. The level of our revenues also depends on mutual fund sales, the number of mutual fund shareholder transactions and accounts, and the fee ratesfees charged for our services, which are based on contracts with our SIPs orfunds and our clients. These arrangements could change in the future.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162019 (“fiscal year 20162019”), the global equity financial markets experienced volatility amidbut provided overall positive returns, reflecting, among other things, ongoing growth concerns, about economic growthexpectations for central banks to continue their accommodative monetary policies and hopes for progress in Europe, China and emerging markets,global trade tensions, as well as continued weakness in oil prices. Volatility increased significantly in late June following the U.K.s referendum to leave the European Union but eased during our fiscal fourth quarter. Overall equity market returns for the fiscal year were positive, evidenced by increases of 15.4% in the S&P 500 Index and 12.0% in the MSCI World Index.Index increased 4.3% and 2.4%. The global bond markets also had positive results, withwere positively impacted by lower interest rates and the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index increasing 8.8%increased 7.6% for the fiscal year.
Our total AUM was $692.6 billionat September 30, 2016 was $733.3 billion, 5%2019, 3% lower than at September 30, 2015, primarily due to $86.52018 as $31.8 billion of net new outflows and $19.1 billion of net market change, distributions and other were partially offset by $53.4$26.4 billion of market appreciation and other.from an acquisition. Simple monthly average AUM (“average AUM”) decreased 14%6% during fiscal year 20162019.
The business and regulatory environments in which we operate globally remain complex, uncertain and subject to change. We are subject to various laws, rules and regulations globally that impose restrictions, limitations, and registration, reporting and disclosure requirements on our business, and add complexity to our global compliance operations.
Uncertainties regarding economic stabilization and improvementthe global economy remain for the foreseeable future. As we continue to confront the challenges of the current economic and regulatory environments, we remain focused on the investment performance of our SIPsproducts and on providing high quality customer service to our clients. We continuously perform reviews of our business model. As a result of such reviews, during fiscal year 2016 we implemented changes that we believe will strengthen future investment performance and position ourselves for future success. While we remain focused on expense management, we will also seek to attract, retain and develop employees and invest strategically in systems and technology that will provide a secure and stable environment. We will continue to seek to protect and further our brand recognition while developing and maintaining broker-dealer and client relationships. The success of these and other strategies may be influenced by the factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in Part I of this Annual Report.Report on Form 10‑K.





3133

Table of Contents


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share data)       2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
       2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014  2019 2018 2017 
Operating revenues $6,618.0
 $7,948.7
 $8,491.4
 (17%) (6%) $5,774.5
 $6,319.1
 $6,392.2
 (9%) (1%)
Operating income 2,365.7
 3,027.6
 3,221.2
 (22%) (6%) 1,557.4
 2,118.6
 2,264.3
 (26%) (6%)
Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. 1,726.7
 2,035.3
 2,384.3
 (15%) (15%) 1,195.7
 764.4
 1,696.7
 56% (55%)
Diluted earnings per share $2.94
 $3.29
 $3.79
 (11%) (13%) $2.35
 $1.39
 $3.01
 69% (54%)
Operating margin1
 35.7% 38.1% 37.9%     27.0% 33.5% 35.4%    
___________________ 
1
Defined as operating income divided by total operating revenues.
1    Defined as operating income divided by total operating revenues.
Operating income decreased $661.9$561.2 million in fiscal year 20162019 as operating revenues decreased 9% while operating expenses were unchanged. Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. increased $431.3 million primarily due to a 17%prior-year estimated income tax charge of $968.8 million resulting from enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”), partially offset by the decrease in operating income.
Operating income decreased $145.7 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 (“fiscal year 2018”) due to a 1% decrease in operating revenues was partially offset byand a 14% decrease2% increase in operating expenses. Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. decreased $308.6$932.3 million primarily due to the decrease in operatingestimated income partially offset by a $143.6tax charge of $968.8 million increase in investment and other income, net.resulting from enactment of the Tax Act.
Operating income decreased $193.6 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 (“fiscal year 2015”) as a 6% decrease in operating revenues was partially offset by a 7% decrease in operating expenses. Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. decreased $349.0 million primarily due to the decrease in operating income and a $195.4 million decrease in investment and other income, net.
Diluted earnings per share increased in fiscal year 2019 and decreased in fiscal years 2016 and 2015,year 2018, consistent with the decreaseschanges in net income and the impacts of 5%6% and 2%4% decreases in diluted average common shares outstanding primarily resulting from the repurchaserepurchases of shares of our common stock.
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
AUM by investment objective was as follows:
(in billions)       2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
       2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
as of September 30, 2016 2015 2014  2019 2018 2017 
Equity                    
Global/international $200.4
 $212.1
 $261.5
 (6%) (19%) $158.4
 $194.4
 $209.8
 (19%) (7%)
United States 103.3
 100.8
 109.5
 2% (8%) 112.1
 115.2
 107.2
 (3%) 7%
Total equity 303.7
 312.9
 371.0
 (3%) (16%) 270.5
 309.6
 317.0
 (13%) (2%)
Hybrid 137.4
 138.3
 159.0
 (1%) (13%)
Multi-Asset/Balanced 134.3
 138.9
 143.3
 (3%) (3%)
Fixed Income                 
 
Tax-free 76.5
 71.7
 72.1
 7% (1%) 66.3
 63.9
 71.0
 4% (10%)
Taxable                 
 
Global/international 156.2
 182.7
 225.1
 (15%) (19%) 144.6
 150.6
 165.0
 (4%) (9%)
United States 53.4
 58.5
 63.8
 (9%) (8%) 67.4
 44.8
 50.6
 50% (11%)
Total fixed income 286.1
 312.9
 361.0
 (9%) (13%) 278.3
 259.3
 286.6
 7% (10%)
Cash Management 6.1
 6.8
 7.0
 (10%) (3%) 9.5
 9.3
 6.3
 2% 48%
Total $733.3
 $770.9
 $898.0
 (5%) (14%) $692.6
 $717.1
 $753.2
 (3%) (5%)
Average for the Year $749.3
 $869.5
 $887.9
 (14%) (2%) $697.0
 $740.5
 $736.9
 (6%) 0%
AUM at September 30, 20162019 decreased 3% from September 30, 2018 as $31.8 billion of net outflows and $19.1 billion of net market change, distributions and other were partially offset by $26.4 billion from an acquisition. Average AUM decreased 6% during fiscal year 2019.


34

Table of Contents

AUM at September 30, 2018 decreased 5% from September 30, 2015, primarily due to $86.52017 as $38.0 billion of net new outflows and $7.9 billion of net market change, distributions and other were partially offset by $53.4$9.8 billion of market appreciation and other.from an acquisition. Average AUM was impacted by the same factors, decreasing 14%increased slightly during fiscal year 2016.



32

Table of Contents

AUM at September 30, 2015 decreased 14% from September 30, 2014, primarily due to $57.9 billion of market depreciation, $48.8 billion of net new outflows and a $15.1 billion decrease due to foreign exchange revaluation. Average AUM was also impacted by market depreciation, which primarily occurred in the fourth fiscal quarter, decreasing 2% during fiscal year 2015.2018.
Average AUM is generally more indicative of trends in revenue for providing investment management and fund administration services than the year-over-year change in ending AUM.
Average AUM and the mix of average AUM by investment objective are shown below.
(in billions) Average AUM 2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
 Average AUM 2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014  2019 2018 2017 
Equity       

 

       

 

Global/international $205.1
 $247.5
 $262.1
 (17%) (6%) $171.7
 $205.8
 $203.7
 (17%) 1%
United States 101.1
 112.4
 107.6
 (10%) 4% 109.0
 110.2
 104.4
 (1%) 6%
Total equity 306.2
 359.9
 369.7
 (15%) (3%) 280.7
 316.0
 308.1
 (11%) 3%
Hybrid 135.5
 155.3
 152.7
 (13%) 2%
Multi-Asset/Balanced 133.4
 140.6
 140.2
 (5%) 0%
Fixed Income                 

 

Tax-free 74.0
 73.1
 71.0
 1% 3% 63.9
 67.3
 72.3
 (5%) (7%)
Taxable       

 

       

 

Global/international 172.6
 211.7
 227.7
 (18%) (7%) 151.1
 160.6
 157.8
 (6%) 2%
United States 54.5
 62.4
 60.2
 (13%) 4% 58.4
 48.0
 52.3
 22% (8%)
Total fixed income 301.1
 347.2
 358.9
 (13%) (3%) 273.4
 275.9
 282.4
 (1%) (2%)
Cash Management 6.5
 7.1
 6.6
 (8%) 8% 9.5
 8.0
 6.2
 19% 29%
Total $749.3
 $869.5
 $887.9
 (14%) (2%) $697.0
 $740.5
 $736.9
 (6%) 0%
 Mix of Average AUM Mix of Average AUM
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Equity            
Global/international 27% 28% 30% 25% 28% 28%
United States 14% 13% 12% 16% 15% 14%
Total equity 41% 41% 42% 41% 43% 42%
Hybrid 18% 18% 17%
Multi-Asset/Balanced 19% 19% 19%
Fixed Income            
Tax-free 10% 9% 8% 9% 9% 10%
Taxable            
Global/international 23% 24% 25% 22% 22% 21%
United States 7% 7% 7% 8% 6% 7%
Total fixed income 40% 40% 40% 39% 37% 38%
Cash Management 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%





3335

Table of Contents


Components of the change in AUM were as follows:are shown below. Net market change, distributions and other includes appreciation (depreciation), distributions to investors that represent return on investments and return of capital, foreign exchange revaluation and net cash management.
(in billions)       2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
       2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014  2019 2018 2017 
Beginning AUM $770.9
 $898.0
 $844.7
 (14%) 6% $717.1
 $753.2
 $733.3
 (5%) 3%
Long-term sales 101.7
 161.4
 192.6
 (37%) (16%) 100.6
 105.0
 112.3
 (4%) (7%)
Long-term redemptions (186.9) (209.0) (197.5) (11%) 6% (155.9) (162.1) (169.7) (4%) (4%)
Net cash management (1.3) (1.2) 0.3
 8% NM
Net new flows (86.5) (48.8) (4.6) 77% 961%
Reinvested distributions 23.3
 28.5
 21.6
 (18%) 32%
Long-term net exchanges (0.7) (0.4) (0.1) 75% 300%
Long-term reinvested distributions 24.2
 19.5
 18.9
 24% 3%
Net flows (63.2) (20.3) 17.0
 211% NM
 (31.8) (38.0) (38.6) (16%) (2%)
Distributions (27.8) (33.8) (26.1) (18%) 30%
Appreciation (depreciation) and other1
 53.4
 (73.0) 62.4
 NM
 NM
Acquisitions 26.4
 9.8
 0.4
 169% NM
Net market change, distributions and other (19.1) (7.9) 58.1
 142% NM
Ending AUM $733.3
 $770.9
 $898.0
 (5%) (14%) $692.6
 $717.1
 $753.2
 (3%) (5%)
 __________________
1
Includes foreign exchange revaluation.
Components of the change in AUM by investment objective were as follows:
(in billions) Equity   Fixed Income    
for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2016
 Global/International United States Hybrid Tax-Free 
Taxable
Global/International
 
Taxable
United States
 
Cash
Management
 Total
AUM at October 1, 2015 $212.1
 $100.8
 $138.3
 $71.7
 $182.7
 $58.5
 $6.8
 $770.9
Long-term sales 21.9
 13.7
 14.3
 8.9
 34.2
 8.7
 
 101.7
Long-term redemptions (48.9) (24.1) (26.8) (8.8) (62.5) (15.8) 
 (186.9)
Net exchanges (1.1) 0.6
 (0.4) 0.8
 (0.5) 0.1
 0.5
 
Net cash management 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1.3) (1.3)
Net new flows (28.1) (9.8) (12.9) 0.9
 (28.8) (7.0) (0.8) (86.5)
Reinvested distributions 4.3
 5.8
 5.8
 2.0
 4.2
 1.2
 
 23.3
Net flows (23.8) (4.0) (7.1) 2.9
 (24.6) (5.8) (0.8) (63.2)
Distributions (5.0) (6.3) (6.5) (2.4) (5.7) (1.9) 
 (27.8)
Appreciation and other1
 17.1
 12.8
 12.7
 4.3
 3.8
 2.6
 0.1
 53.4
AUM at September 30, 2016 $200.4
 $103.3
 $137.4
 $76.5
 $156.2
 $53.4
 $6.1
 $733.3
(in billions) Equity   Fixed Income    
for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2019
 Global/International United States Multi-Asset/Balanced Tax-Free 
Taxable
Global/International
 
Taxable
United States
 
Cash
Management
 Total
AUM at October 1, 2018 $194.4
 $115.2
 $138.9
 $63.9
 $150.6
 $44.8
 $9.3
 $717.1
Long-term sales 17.7
 17.0
 12.1
 7.5
 38.8
 7.5
 
 100.6
Long-term redemptions (43.4) (23.0) (21.3) (9.9) (44.8) (13.5) 
 (155.9)
Long-term net exchanges (1.8) (0.5) 1.3
 0.2
 (0.1) 0.2
 
 (0.7)
Long-term reinvested distributions 5.0
 5.7
 5.7
 1.7
 5.1
 1.0
 
 24.2
Net flows (22.5) (0.8) (2.2) (0.5) (1.0) (4.8) 
 (31.8)
Acquisition 
 
 
 
 
 26.4
 
 26.4
Net market change, distributions and other (13.5) (2.3) (2.4) 2.9
 (5.0) 1.0
 0.2
 (19.1)
AUM at September 30, 2019 $158.4
 $112.1
 $134.3
 $66.3
 $144.6
 $67.4
 $9.5
 $692.6

(in billions) Equity   Fixed Income    
for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2018
 Global/International United States Multi-Asset/Balanced Tax-Free 
Taxable
Global/International
 
Taxable
United States
 
Cash
Management
 Total
AUM at October 1, 2017 $209.8
 $107.2
 $143.3
 $71.0
 $165.0
 $50.6
 $6.3
 $753.2
Long-term sales 22.8
 16.6
 15.3
 5.6
 36.9
 7.8
 
 105.0
Long-term redemptions (48.0) (23.6) (23.2) (11.9) (42.2) (13.2) 
 (162.1)
Long-term net exchanges (0.3) 0.9
 0.2
 (0.6) (0.8) 0.2
 
 (0.4)
Long-term reinvested distributions 2.8
 4.0
 5.5
 2.0
 4.1
 1.1
 
 19.5
Net flows (22.7) (2.1) (2.2) (4.9) (2.0) (4.1) 
 (38.0)
Acquisition 9.8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9.8
Net market change, distributions and other (2.5) 10.1
 (2.2) (2.2) (12.4) (1.7) 3.0
 (7.9)
AUM at September 30, 2018 $194.4
 $115.2
 $138.9
 $63.9
 $150.6
 $44.8
 $9.3
 $717.1
 __________________
1
Includes foreign exchange revaluation.






3436

Table of Contents


(in billions) Equity   Fixed Income    
for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2015
 Global/International United States Hybrid Tax-Free 
Taxable
Global/International
 
Taxable
United
States
 
Cash
Management
 Total
AUM at October 1, 2014 $261.5
 $109.5
 $159.0
 $72.1
 $225.1
 $63.8
 $7.0
 $898.0
Long-term sales 40.3
 19.2
 24.1
 8.2
 56.1
 13.5
 
 161.4
Long-term redemptions (55.3) (26.3) (28.4) (10.3) (72.8) (15.9) 
 (209.0)
Net exchanges 0.2
 1.1
 (0.5) 
 (1.6) (0.1) 0.9
 
Net cash management 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1.2) (1.2)
Net new flows (14.8) (6.0) (4.8) (2.1) (18.3) (2.5) (0.3) (48.8)
Reinvested distributions 5.6
 5.7
 6.0
 2.0
 7.5
 1.7
 
 28.5
Net flows (9.2) (0.3) 1.2
 (0.1) (10.8) (0.8) (0.3) (20.3)
Distributions (6.6) (6.0) (6.8) (2.6) (9.5) (2.3) 
 (33.8)
Appreciation (depreciation) and other1
 (33.6) (2.4) (15.1) 2.3
 (22.1) (2.2) 0.1
 (73.0)
AUM at September 30, 2015 $212.1
 $100.8
 $138.3
 $71.7
 $182.7
 $58.5
 $6.8
 $770.9
(in billions) Equity   Fixed Income    
for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017
 Global/International United States Multi-Asset/Balanced Tax-Free 
Taxable
Global/International
 
Taxable
United States
 
Cash
Management
 Total
AUM at October 1, 2016 $200.4
 $103.3
 $137.4
 $76.5
 $156.2
 $53.4
 $6.1
 $733.3
Long-term sales 24.7
 14.7
 16.8
 7.4
 38.2
 10.5
 
 112.3
Long-term redemptions (48.4) (25.4) (25.7) (11.6) (44.3) (14.3) 
 (169.7)
Long-term net exchanges (0.1) 0.3
 0.4
 (0.5) (0.4) 0.2
 
 (0.1)
Long-term reinvested distributions 3.0
 4.3
 5.1
 2.0
 3.4
 1.1
 
 18.9
Net flows (20.8) (6.1) (3.4) (2.7) (3.1) (2.5) 
 (38.6)
Acquisition 
 
 0.4
 
 
 
 
 0.4
Net market change, distributions and other 30.2
 10.0
 8.9
 (2.8) 11.9
 (0.3) 0.2
 58.1
AUM at September 30, 2017 $209.8
 $107.2
 $143.3
 $71.0
 $165.0
 $50.6
 $6.3
 $753.2
__________________
1
Includes foreign exchange revaluation.

(in billions) Equity   Fixed Income    
for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2014
 Global/International United States Hybrid Tax-Free 
Taxable
Global/International
 
Taxable
United States
 
Cash
Management
 Total
AUM at October 1, 2013 $243.9
 $97.2
 $137.5
 $72.4
 $228.8
 $58.3
 $6.6
 $844.7
Long-term sales 51.5
 24.3
 31.5
 8.2
 60.8
 16.3
 
 192.6
Long-term redemptions (54.1) (24.7) (23.4) (13.2) (66.7) (15.4) 
 (197.5)
Net exchanges 0.5
 0.6
 1.8
 (1.0) (2.1) 
 0.2
 
Net cash management 
 
 
 
 
 
 0.3
 0.3
Net new flows (2.1) 0.2
 9.9
 (6.0) (8.0) 0.9
 0.5
 (4.6)
Reinvested distributions 3.9
 3.5
 5.3
 2.4
 4.9
 1.6
 
 21.6
Net flows 1.8
 3.7
 15.2
 (3.6) (3.1) 2.5
 0.5
 17.0
Distributions (4.4) (3.7) (6.1) (2.9) (6.8) (2.2) 
 (26.1)
Appreciation (depreciation) and other1
 20.2
 12.3
 12.4
 6.2
 6.2
 5.2
 (0.1) 62.4
AUM at September 30, 2014 $261.5
 $109.5
 $159.0
 $72.1
 $225.1
 $63.8
 $7.0
 $898.0
__________________
1
Includes foreign exchange revaluation.
AUM decreased $37.6$24.5 billion or 5%3% during fiscal year 2016, primarily2019 due to $86.5$31.8 billion of net new outflows and $19.1 billion of net market change, distributions and other, partially offset by $53.4$26.4 billion from an acquisition. The net outflows included outflows of market appreciation$7.0 billion from six institutional clients, of which $2.9 billion was from Canadian mandates and other, which includes a $2.4$2.1 billion increasewas due to foreign exchange revaluation.two clients’ mandatory redemption policies following portfolio manager departures; $4.3 billion from two global/international equity funds; $2.7 billion from a global/international fixed income fund; $1.4 billion from an institutional U.S. fixed income product; $1.3 billion from a multi-asset/balanced fund; $1.2 billion from two sub-advised institutional products and $1.0 billion from a sub-advised variable annuity client. The outflows were partially offset by inflows of $1.9 billion in a global/international fixed income fund and $1.8 billion in a U.S. equity fund. Long-term sales decreased 37%4% to $101.7$100.6 billion from the prior year due to lower sales in global/international equity and long-termmulti-asset/balanced products, partially offset by higher sales in tax-free and global/international fixed income products. Long-term redemptions decreased 11%4% to $186.9 billion. Both declines occurred in all long-term investment objectives, primarily$155.9 billion due to lower redemptions in global/international products, with the exception ofequity, tax-free fixed income sales. Theand multi-asset/balanced products, partially offset by higher redemptions of global/international fixed income products. Net market appreciation occurred in all investment objectiveschange, distributions and reflected positive returns in global markets, as evidencedother primarily consists of $30.5 billion of long-term distributions and a $2.9 billion decrease from foreign exchange revaluation, partially offset by increases in the MSCI World index$14.1 billion of 12.0%, the S&P 500 index of 15.4% and the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index of 8.8%.market appreciation. The foreign exchange revaluation resulted from AUM in products that are not U.S. dollar denominated, which represented approximately 14% of total AUM as of September 30, 2016.2019, and was primarily due to strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Euro, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar and Pound Sterling. The market appreciation occurred in all long-term investment objectives except global/international equity, and reflected positive returns in global fixed income markets as evidenced by a 7.6% increase in the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index and in the U.S. equity market as evidenced by a 4.3% increase in the S&P 500 Index.
AUM decreased $127.1$36.1 billion or 14%5% during fiscal year 2015, primarily2018 due to $73.0 billion of market depreciation and other, which includes a $15.1 billion decrease due to foreign exchange revaluation, and $48.8$38.0 billion of net new outflows.outflows and $7.9 billion of net market change, distributions and other, partially offset by $9.8 billion from an acquisition. The market depreciation occurrednet outflows included outflows of $7.6 billion from seven institutional products, $6.0 billion from three global/international fixed income funds, $4.5 billion from two global/international equity funds, $4.1 billion from a multi-asset/balanced fund and $0.9 billion from a fixed income tax-free fund, and were partially offset by inflows of $3.3 billion in a global/international fixed income fund, $3.0 billion in two institutional products and $1.2 billion in a multi-asset/balanced fund. Long-term sales decreased 7% to $105.0 billion from the prior year due to lower sales in all long-term investment objectives with the exception of U.S. equity. Long-term redemptions decreased 4% to $162.1 billion due to lower redemptions in all long-term investment objectives with the exception of tax-free fixed income,income. Net market change, distributions and reflected negative returns in global markets, as evidencedother primarily consists of $25.3 billion of long-term distributions and a $4.7 billion decrease from foreign exchange revaluation, partially offset by decreases in the MSCI World and S&P 500 indexes$19.1 billion of 4.6% and 0.6%.market appreciation. The foreign exchange revaluation resulted from AUM in products that are not U.S. dollar denominated, which represented



35

Table of Contents

approximately 13% 15% of total AUM as of September 30, 2015,2018, and was primarily due to strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Indian Rupee, Canadian dollar and Australian dollardollar. The market appreciation occurred primarily in equity and Euro. Long-term sales decreased 16% to $161.4 billion from the prior year due to lower sales ofmulti-asset/balanced products, in all long-term investment objectives with the exception of tax-free fixed income. Long-term redemptions increased 6% to $209.0 billion primarily due to higher redemptionspartially offset by depreciation in global/international fixed income products, and hybrid products.reflected positive returns in global equity markets as evidenced by increases of 11.8% and 17.9% in the MSCI World Index and S&P 500 Index and negative returns in global fixed income markets as evidenced by a 1.3% decrease in the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index.


37

Table of Contents

Average AUM by sales region is shown below.was as follows:
(in billions)       2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
       2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014  2019 2018 2017 
United States $507.4
 $577.9
 $578.8
 (12%) 0% $473.3
 $491.1
 $497.1
 (4%) (1%)
International                 

 

Europe, the Middle East and Africa 108.9
 137.9
 149.5
 (21%) (8%)
Europe, Middle East and Africa 91.5
 105.8
 104.1
 (14%) 2%
Asia-Pacific 82.7
 90.0
 91.6
 (8%) (2%) 90.4
 95.2
 87.0
 (5%) 9%
Canada 31.3
 36.2
 39.0
 (14%) (7%) 27.2
 31.1
 31.1
 (13%) 0%
Latin America1
 19.0
 27.5
 29.0
 (31%) (5%) 14.6
 17.3
 17.6
 (16%) (2%)
Total international $241.9
 $291.6
 $309.1
 (17%) (6%) $223.7
 $249.4
 $239.8
 (10%) 4%
Total $749.3
 $869.5
 $887.9
 (14%) (2%) $697.0
 $740.5
 $736.9
 (6%) 0%
___________________________ 
1    Latin America sales region includes North America-based advisers serving non-resident clients.
1
Includes North America-based advisers serving non-resident clients.
The percentage of average AUM in the United States sales region was 68%, 66% and 65%67% for fiscal years 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.
Due toThe region in which investment products are sold may differ from the global nature of our business operations,geographic area in which we provide investment management and related services may be performed in locations unrelated to the sales region.products.
Investment Performance Overview
A key driver of our overall success is the long-term investment performance of our SIPs.investment products. A standard measure of the performance of these investment products is the percentage of AUM exceeding benchmarks and peer group medians. Our global/international fixed incomeU.S. equity products generated notable long-term results with at least 84% of AUM exceeding the benchmarks and at least 90%67% of AUM exceeding the peer group medians during the periods presented, although they generally lagged against the benchmarks. Our global/international fixed income products had at least 74% of AUM exceed the benchmark and peer group median comparisons for the five-three- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2016.2019. The comparisons for theseperformance of our multi-asset/balanced products tosignificantly exceeded the benchmark and peer group median for the three-year period decreased significantly from September 30, 2015, primarily due to lower performance by three funds which collectively represent approximately 60% of this category. However, the comparisons have increased significantly from the prior year for our hybrid products versus the one-year period benchmark and one-year and five-year period peer group medians for the one- and for our taxable U.S. fixed income products versusten-year periods, but has lagged in the one-year period benchmarkother comparisons and peer group median. The hybrid products increase was primarily due to higheragainst the benchmarks during the periods presented, reflecting the performance byof a fund whichthat represents approximately 70%68% of this category. The performance of our tax-free and U.S. taxable fixed income, as well as of our global/international equity products, has mostly lagged the benchmarks and peer group medians during the periods presented.





3638



The performance of our products against benchmarks and peer group medians is presented in the table below.
 
Benchmark Comparison 1, 2
 
Peer Group Comparison 1, 3
 
Benchmark Comparison 1, 2
 
Peer Group Comparison 1, 3
 % of AUM Exceeding Benchmark % of AUM in Top Two Peer Group Quartiles % of AUM Exceeding Benchmark % of AUM in Top Two Peer Group Quartiles
as of September 30, 2016 1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 10-Year 1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 10-Year
as of September 30, 2019 1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 10-Year 1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 10-Year
Equity                                
Global/international 25% 13% 25% 47% 40% 30% 55% 52% 27% 24% 24% 23% 37% 29% 28% 29%
United States 38% 20% 6% 32% 77% 61% 52% 71% 49% 30% 32% 27% 87% 69% 67% 73%
Total equity 30% 15% 18% 41% 55% 42% 54% 60% 37% 27% 27% 25% 59% 47% 45% 49%
Hybrid 81% 8% 9% 8% 90% 9% 87% 94%
Multi-Asset/Balanced 7% 8% 7% 1% 87% 25% 17% 74%
Fixed Income                                
Tax-free 44% 63% 55% 39% 44% 60% 48% 88% 47% 39% 44% 41% 49% 46% 45% 45%
Taxable                                
Global/international 5% 8% 84% 88% 6% 3% 90% 93% 8% 78% 7% 76% 16% 74% 52% 80%
United States 52% 32% 68% 55% 39% 14% 27% 54% 2% 40% 8% 54% 13% 20% 11% 5%
Total fixed income 24% 29% 72% 66% 24% 24% 64% 84% 17% 61% 18% 60% 24% 58% 43% 55%
____________________________ 
1 
AUM measured in the 1-year benchmark and peer group rankings represents 89% and 81%85% of our total AUM as of September 30, 2016.2019.
2 
The benchmark comparisons are based on each fund’s return as compared to a market index that has been selected to be generally consistent with the investment objectives of the fund.
3 
The peer group rankings are sourced from either Lipper, a Thomson Reuters Company, Morningstar or eVestment and various international third-party providers in each fund’s market and were based on an absolute ranking of returns. © 20162019 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information.
For products with multiple share classes, rankings for the primaryall share classclasses with applicable history in their respective time periods are applied to the entire product.included. Rankings for most institutional separately-managedseparate accounts are as of the prior quarter-end due to timing of availability of information. Private equity and debt funds, certain privately-offered emerging market and real estate funds, cash management funds and certain hedge and other funds acquired in fiscal year 2013 are not included. Certain other funds and products were also excluded because of limited benchmark or peer group data. Had this data been available, the results may have been different. These results assume the reinvestment of dividends, are based on data available as of October 18, 201616, 2019 and are subject to revision. While we remain focused on achieving strong long-term performance, our future benchmark and peer group rankings may vary from our past performance.
OPERATING REVENUES
The table below presents the percentage change in each operating revenue category.
(in millions)       2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
       2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014  2019 2018 2017 
Investment management fees $4,471.7
 $5,327.8
 $5,565.7
 (16%) (4%) $3,985.2
 $4,367.5
 $4,359.2
 (9%) 0%
Sales and distribution fees 1,806.4
 2,252.4
 2,546.4
 (20%) (12%) 1,444.6
 1,599.8
 1,705.6
 (10%) (6%)
Shareholder servicing fees 243.6
 262.8
 281.1
 (7%) (7%) 216.3
 221.9
 225.7
 (3%) (2%)
Other 96.3
 105.7
 98.2
 (9%) 8% 128.4
 129.9
 101.7
 (1%) 28%
Total Operating Revenues $6,618.0
 $7,948.7
 $8,491.4
 (17%) (6%) $5,774.5
 $6,319.1
 $6,392.2
 (9%) (1%)





3739

Table of Contents


Investment Management Fees
Investment management fees are generally calculated under contractual arrangements with our SIPsinvestment products and the products for which we provide sub-advisory services as a percentage of the market value of AUM. Annual fee rates vary by investment objective and type of services provided. RatesFee rates for products sold outside of the U.S. are generally higher than for U.S. products because they are structured to compensate for certain distribution costs.products.
Investment management fees decreased $856.1$382.3 million in fiscal year 20162019 primarily due to a 14%6% decrease in average AUM, a $59.6 million decrease from a change in presentation of certain fees from investment management fees to distribution fees upon adoption of new revenue recognition accounting guidance on October 1, 2018, and the impact of a lower effective investment management fee rate. Investment management fees decreased $237.9 million in fiscal year 2015 primarily due to a 2% decrease in average AUM and the impact of a lower effective fee rate.rate, partially offset by higher performance fees. The decrease in average AUM in fiscal year 2016 occurred in all sales regions and primarily in the global/international and hybrid investment objectives. The decrease in average AUM in fiscal year 2015 primarily occurred in the international sales regions and in the global/internationalmulti-asset/balanced investment objectives, partially offset by an increase in the U.S. taxable fixed income investment objective, and across all sales regions, most significantly in the U.S. and Europe, Middle East and Africa.
Investment management fees increased $8.3 million in fiscal year 2018 primarily due to a slight increase in average AUM partially offset by lower performance fees. Average AUM increases in the other investment objectives.Asia-Pacific and Europe, Middle East and Africa sales regions were largely offset by a decrease in the U.S.
Our effective investment management fee rate excluding performance fees (investment management fees excluding performance fees divided by average AUM) was 59.7, 61.3 and 62.756.4 basis points for fiscal year 2019 and 58.7 basis points for both fiscal years 2016, 20152018 and 20142017. The rate decrease in fiscal year 20162019 was primarily due to higher weightingslower weighting of AUM in U.S. products andthe global/international equity investment objective, which generally has the highest fee rates, along with a higher mix of AUM in lower fee products inwithin the global/international investment objectives in the Europe, Middle EastU.S. and Africa and Asia-Pacific sales regions, partially offset by higher performance fees. The rate decrease in fiscal year 2015 was primarily due to higher weightings of AUM in U.S. products and in lower fee products in the global/international investment objectives in the Europe, Middle East and Africa sales region, as well as lower performance fees.regions for this investment objective, and the $59.6 million decrease from the change in presentation of certain fees discussed above, partially offset by higher rates and mix of AUM in the U.S. taxable fixed income investment objective.
Performance-based investment management fees were $26.5$52.9 million, $19.8$21.2 million and $50.9$35.5 million for fiscal years 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017. The higher feesincrease in fiscal year 2014 were2019 was primarily relateddue to performance fees earned from a private debt fund, of hedge funds products.separate accounts and a real estate fund, while the decrease in fiscal year 2018 was primarily due to lower fees from separate accounts.
U.S. industry asset-weighted average management fee rates were as follows1:follows:
(in basis points) Industry Average 
Industry Average 1
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Equity  
Global/international 53 55 58
Global/international 2
 43 47 50
United States 37 39 41 30 32 35
Hybrid 50 52 53
Multi-Asset/Balanced 45 47 49
Fixed Income  
Tax-free 35 35 35 32 32 33
Taxable  
Global/international2
 43 46 55
Global/international 3
 34 36 39
United States 33 35 37 28 30 31
Cash Management 10 9 11 16 16 15
 ________________
1 
U.S. industry asset-weighted average management fee rates were calculated using information available from Lipper, a Thomson Reuters Company, as of September 30, 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017 and include all U.S.-registered open-end funds that reported expense data to Lipper as of the funds’ most recent annual report date, and for which expenses were equal to or greater than zero. As defined by Lipper, management fees include fees from providing advisory and fund administration services. The averages combine retail and institutional funds data and include all share classes and distribution channels, without exception. Variable annuity and fund of fund products are not included.
2 
The decreases in the average rate in fiscal years 20162019 and 20152018 reflect higher weightings of two large low-fee passive funds.
3
The decreases in the average rate in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 reflect higher weightings of a large low-fee passive fund and lower weightings of two large higher fee funds and higher weightings of a large low fee fund.higher-fee actively managed funds.


40

Table of Contents

The declines in U.S. industry average management fee rates for long-term investment objectives generally reflect increased investor demand for lower-fee passive funds. Our actual effective investment management fee rates are generally higher than the U.S. industry average rates as we actively manage substantially all of our products and have a higher level of international AUM, both of which generate higher fees. Changes to ourOur fiscal year 2019 effective investment management fee rates in the U.S. have not varied significantlywere generally comparable with the prior year, except for a higher effective fee rate for U.S. taxable fixed income products resulting from changesthe acquisition of Benefit Street Partners L.L.C. (“BSP”), a U.S. alternative credit manager, in February 2019. Our U.S. effective fee rates decreased during fiscal year 2018 to a lesser extent than the average industry rates.
Our product offerings and global operations are diverse. As such, the impact of future changes in the market value of AUM on investment management fees will be affected by the relative mix of investment objective, geographic region, distribution channel and investment vehicle of the assets.



38

Table of Contents

Sales and Distribution Fees
We earnSales and distribution fees primarily consist of upfront sales commissions and ongoing distribution fees. Sales commissions are earned from the sale of certain classes of SIPs on which investors pay a commissionsponsored funds at the time of purchase (“commissionable sales”). Sales commissions are and may be reduced or eliminated on some share classes and for some sale transactions depending uponon the amount invested and the type of investor. Therefore, sales fees will change with the overall level of gross sales, the size of individual transactions, and the relative mix of sales between different share classes and types of investors.
Globally, ourOur sponsored mutual funds and certain other products generally pay us distribution fees in return for sales, marketing and distribution efforts on their behalf. Specifically, theThe majority of U.S.-registered mutual funds, with the exception of certain of our money market mutual funds, have adopted distribution plans under Rule 12b-1 (the “Rule 12b-1 Plans”) promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Rule 12b-1 Plans permit the mutual funds to pay us for marketing, marketing support, advertising, printing and sales promotion services relating to the distribution of their shares, subject to the Rule 12b-1 Plans’ limitations on amounts based on average daily netaverage AUM. Similar arrangements exist for the distribution of our non-U.S. funds.
We pay substantially all of our sales and distribution fees to the financial advisers and other intermediaries who sell our SIPs to the publicfunds on our behalf. See the description of sales, distribution and marketing expenses below.
Sales and distribution fees by revenue driver are presented below.
(in millions)       2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
       2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014  2019 2018 2017 
Asset-based fees $1,410.6
 $1,698.9
 $1,823.3
 (17%) (7%) $1,188.2
 $1,314.3
 $1,345.1
 (10%) (2%)
Sales-based fees 386.4
 542.8
 711.7
 (29%) (24%) 244.0
 270.3
 350.8
 (10%) (23%)
Contingent sales charges 9.4
 10.7
 11.4
 (12%) (6%) 12.4
 15.2
 9.7
 (18%) 57%
Sales and Distribution Fees $1,806.4
 $2,252.4
 $2,546.4
 (20%) (12%) $1,444.6
 $1,599.8
 $1,705.6
 (10%) (6%)
Asset-based distribution fees decreased $288.3 million and $124.4$126.1 million in fiscal years 2016 and 2015,year 2019 primarily due to decreases of $273.1 million and $118.9$120.5 million from 14% and 5% decreasesa 9% decrease in the related average AUM. The decreaseAUM and $67.6 million from a lower mix of U.S. Class C assets which have higher fee rates than other share classes, partially offset by a $59.6 million increase from a change in presentation of certain fees to distribution fees from investment management fees upon adoption of new revenue recognition accounting guidance on October 1, 2018. Asset-based distribution fees decreased $30.8 million in fiscal year 2016 also includes $11.32018 as a $60.3 million fromdecrease in U.S. product fees primarily due to a 5% decrease in the implementation of lower Rule 12b-1 Plan fee rates for certain funds effective August 1, 2015.related average U.S. AUM was partially offset by a $29.5 million increase in non-U.S. product fees primarily due to a 4% increase in the related average international AUM.
Sales-based fees decreased $156.4 million and $168.9$26.3 million in fiscal years 2016 and 2015,year 2019 primarily due to decreases of $158.5 million and $193.9$18.2 million from 29% and 28% decreasesa 5% decrease in total commissionable sales. The decrease in fiscal year 2015 was partially offset bysales and $5.3 million from a $30.5 million increase due to a higherlower mix of U.S. product commissionable sales. U.S. products typically generate higher salesSales-based fees than non-U.S. products.decreased $80.5 million in fiscal year 2018 primarily due to an $84.6 million decrease from a 26% decrease in total commissionable sales. Commissionable sales represented 12%9% of total sales for both fiscal years 20162019 and 20142018, and 10%11% for fiscal year 20152017.
Contingent sales charges are earned from investor redemptions within a contracted period of time. TheseSubstantially all of these charges are levied only on certain shares sold without a front-end sales charge, and vary with the mix of redemptions of these shares. Contingent sales charges decreased $2.8 million in fiscal year 2019 and increased $5.5 million in fiscal year 2018 primarily due to changes in redemptions of non-U.S. products.


41

Table of Contents

Shareholder Servicing Fees
We receiveSubstantially all shareholder servicing fees as compensationare earned from our sponsored funds for providing transfer agency services, which include providing customershareholder statements, transaction processing, customer service and tax reporting. These fees are generallyprimarily determined based on a percentage of AUM and either the number of transactions in shareholder accounts or the number of shareholder accounts, while fees from certain funds are based only on AUM. In addition, fund reimbursements of expenses incurred while providing transfer agency services are recognized as revenue effective October 1, 2018 under new revenue recognition guidance. Prior to November 1, 2017, the fees for U.S. funds were based on a fixed chargescharge per shareholder account that vary with the particularvaried by fund type of fund and the service being rendered. In some instances, we charge SIPs these fees based on the level of AUM. In the U.S., transfer agency service agreements provide that accounts closed in a calendar year generally remain billable at a reduced rate through the second quarter of the following calendar year. In Canada, such agreements that were in place through December 31, 2013 provided that accounts closed in the calendar year remain billable for four months after the end of the calendar year. Accordingly, the level of fees varies with the change in open accounts and the level of closed accounts that remain billable. Approximately 1.2 million and 0.6 million accounts closed in the U.S. during calendar years 2015 and 2014. A change to the pricing structure in Canada effective January 1, 2014 resulted in the bundling of investment management and servicing fees, therefore shareholder servicing fees are no longer charged to SIPs in Canada.provided.
Other services include tax planning and preparation for individual and trust clients, for which fees are primarily account based, and trust services, for which fees are based on the level of AUM.



39

Table of Contents

Shareholder servicing fees decreased $19.2$5.6 million in fiscal year 2016,2019 primarily due to decreases of $9.5 million from SIPs in Europe resulting from lower levels of related AUM and $9.4transactions, partially offset by $8.6 million from SIPs in the U.S. resulting from a decrease in active accounts.
of fund expense reimbursement revenue. Shareholder servicing fees decreased $18.3$3.8 million in fiscal year 2015. The2018 primarily due to a $4.9 million decrease primarily consistedfrom U.S. funds which reflects lower levels of $10.2 million fromtransactions and AUM under the change innew fee structure, partially offset by a $1.0 million increase from funds in Canada and $9.2 millionEurope resulting from higher levels of related to fees for trust services that are bundled with investment management services and presented in investment management fees effective October 1, 2014.AUM.
Other
Other revenue decreased $9.4$1.5 million in fiscal year 20162019 primarily due to a $10.5 million decrease inlower interest and dividend income from consolidated SIPs.investment products (“CIPs”), largely offset by higher miscellaneous fee revenues. Other revenue increased $7.5$28.2 million in fiscal year 20152018 primarily due to an $11.3 million increase inhigher interest and dividend income from consolidated SIPs, partially offset by a $4.6 million decrease in banking-related net revenues as we terminated our banking business in fiscal year 2014.CIPs.
OPERATING EXPENSES
The table below presents the percentage change in each operating expense category.
(in millions) 2016 2015 2014 2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
 2019 2018 2017 2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
for the fiscal years ended September 30,  
Sales, distribution and marketing $2,209.9
 $2,762.3
 $3,088.2
 (20%) (11%) $1,819.6
 $2,039.7
 $2,130.9
 (11%) (4%)
Compensation and benefits 1,360.9
 1,453.3
 1,467.9
 (6%) (1%) 1,584.7
 1,390.6
 1,333.7
 14% 4%
Information systems and technology 207.3
 224.3
 216.3
 (8%) 4% 258.5
 243.9
 219.8
 6% 11%
Occupancy 134.1
 132.7
 137.7
 1% (4%) 133.6
 128.6
 121.3
 4% 6%
General, administrative and other 340.1
 348.5
 360.1
 (2%) (3%) 420.7
 397.7
 322.2
 6% 23%
Total Operating Expenses $4,252.3
 $4,921.1
 $5,270.2
 (14%) (7%) $4,217.1
 $4,200.5
 $4,127.9
 0% 2%
Sales, Distribution and Marketing
Sales, distribution and marketing expenses primarily consist of paymentsrelate to services provided by financial advisers, broker-dealers and other third parties for providing services to investors in our SIPs,sponsored funds, including marketing support services. SalesSubstantially all sales expenses are determined as percentages of sales and are incurred from the same commissionable sales transactions that generate sales fee revenues. Distribution expensesrevenues and are determined as percentagesa percentage of AUM andsales. Substantially all distribution expenses are incurred from assets that generate either distribution fees or higher levelsand are determined as a percentage of investment management fees.AUM. Marketing support expenses are based on AUM, sales or a combination thereof. Also included is the amortization of deferred sales commissions related to up-frontupfront commissions on shares sold without a front-end sales charge to investors.charge. The deferred sales commissions are amortized over the periods in which commissions are generally recovered from related revenues.
Sales, distribution and marketing expenses by cost driver are presented below.
(in millions) 2016 2015 2014 2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
 2019 2018 2017 2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
for the fiscal years ended September 30,  
Asset-based expenses $1,792.7
 $2,161.0
 $2,307.2
 (17%) (6%) $1,476.0
 $1,703.9
 $1,735.8
 (13%) (2%)
Sales-based expenses 342.0
 488.5
 653.2
 (30%) (25%) 257.8
 255.1
 323.1
 1% (21%)
Amortization of deferred sales commissions 75.2
 112.8
 127.8
 (33%) (12%) 85.8
 80.7
 72.0
 6% 12%
Sales, Distribution and Marketing $2,209.9
 $2,762.3
 $3,088.2
 (20%) (11%) $1,819.6
 $2,039.7
 $2,130.9
 (11%) (4%)





4042

Table of Contents


Asset-based expenses decreased $368.3 million and $146.2$227.9 million in fiscal years 2016 and 2015year 2019 primarily due to $352.4decreases of $161.4 million and $168.5 million of decreases in distribution expense from 14% and 5% decreasesa 10% decrease in the related average AUM. The decreaseAUM, and $64.3 million from a lower mix of U.S. Class C assets which have higher expense rates than other share classes. Asset-based expenses decreased $31.9 million in fiscal year 20152018 as a $60.8 million decrease in U.S. product expenses primarily due to a 5% decrease in the related average U.S. AUM was partially offset by a $26.6$28.9 million increase in marketing support expensenon-U.S. product expenses primarily due to a change2% increase in fee structure for certain service providers effective January 2015 from sales-based fees to asset-based fees.the related average international AUM. Distribution expenses, which are typically higher for non-U.S. products, are generally not directly correlated with distribution fee revenues due to certain international fee structures whichthat do not provide forfull recovery of certain distribution costs through investment management fees.costs.
Sales-based expenses decreased $146.5increased $2.7 million in fiscal year 20162019 primarily due to $133.7increases of $22.6 million from the recognition of sales commissions on U.S. Class C shares as expense at the time of sale and $10.0 million from revised U.S. dealer commission pricing effective September 2018, partially offset by decreases of $14.2 million from a 29%5% decrease in total commissionable sales. The decrease also included $6.7sales and $12.6 million in India primarily related to lower sales and regulatory-driven changes in fee structure,structure. The recognition of sales commissions on U.S. Class C shares as expense at the time of sale is consistent with the treatment of contract costs with a useful life of one year or less under new revenue recognition accounting guidance adopted on October 1, 2018. The commissions relate to shares sold without a front-end sales charge and $6.6 million from lower marketing support expense primarily resulting from the changewere deferred and amortized over one year in fee structure for certain service providers and lower related sales.prior years.
Sales-based expenses decreased $164.7$68.0 million in fiscal year 20152018 primarily due to $168.3a $75.0 million decrease from a 28%26% decrease in total commissionable sales, and $17.1 million from lower marketing support expense from the change in fee structure for certain service providers. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $14.0a $4.4 million related toincrease from a higher average commission rate resulting from a higher mix of U.S. product commissionable sales and $12.8 million related to a regulatory-driven change in fee structure in India in effect from November 2014 to May 2015 under which we assumed responsibility for commission expenses previously paid by the local fund products in exchange for offsetting additional investment management fees.sales. U.S. products typically generate higher sales commissions than non-U.S. products.
Amortization of deferred sales commissions decreased $37.6 million and $15.0increased $5.1 million in fiscal years 2016 and 2015 primarily due to loweryear 2019, as the impact of higher sales of U.S. shares sold without a front-end sales charge to investors.was largely offset by the change in accounting for U.S. Class C shares discussed above, which resulted in no further deferral and amortization. The decreaseunamortized deferred Class C commission balance of $9.1 million at September 30, 2018 was reversed against retained earnings upon adoption of the new accounting guidance. Amortization of deferred sales commissions increased $8.7 million in fiscal year 2016 also includes $7.62018 primarily due to a $21.0 million related to accelerated amortization in prior years and $5.1increase from higher sales of non-U.S. shares sold without a front-end sales charge, partially offset by a $12.0 million decrease from lower such sales of adjustments related to prior-year amortization expense.U.S. shares.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefit expenses decreased $92.4increased $194.1 million in fiscal year 20162019 due to a $108.4increases of $162.6 million decreasein salaries, wages and benefits and $31.5 million in variable compensation. Salaries, wages and benefits increased primarily due to increases of $60.7 million from acquisition-related retention compensation, $60.1 millionin termination benefits, $24.5 million for annual salary increases that were effective December 1, 2018 and 2017, and $23.8 million from higher average staffing levels primarily due to acquisitions, partially offset by a $16.0$12.5 million decrease from favorable foreign currency impacts. The increase in termination benefits was primarily due to special benefits related to the voluntary separation of approximately 250 employees, which was 2.5% of our global workforce, and an additional 2.0% workforce reduction. Variable compensation increased primarily due to a $46.6 million increase for acquired firms’ performance bonus plans, partially offset by an $18.0 million decrease in bonus expense based on our lower performance.
We expect to incur additional acquisition-related retention expenses of approximately $80 million during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020 (“fiscal year 2020”), and amounts that decrease by approximately $10 million per year in the following four fiscal years. We also expect to incur termination benefit expenses of approximately $6 million during fiscal year 2020 related to outsourcing our fund administration services.
Compensation and benefit expenses increased $56.9 million in fiscal year 2018 due to a $69.1 million increase in salaries, wages and benefits. Thebenefits, partially offset by a $12.2 million decrease in variable compensation decrease was primarily due to $81.2 million related to our lower performance, as well as $8.9 million related to private equity and other product performance fees.compensation. The increase in salaries, wages and benefits was primarily due to increases of $55.7$25.1 million in termination benefits and $18.0from higher average staffing levels, $21.9 million for annual merit salary adjustments that were effective December 1, 2015, largely offset by decreases of $35.02017 and 2016, $14.2 millionin termination benefits and $6.5 million from lower staffing levels and $16.2 million from favorableunfavorable foreign currency impacts. The increase in termination benefits is primarily due to special benefits related to the voluntary separation of approximately 300 employees. We may incur additional termination benefit expenses as we continue to implement changes to our business.
Compensation and benefit expenses decreased $14.6 million in fiscal year 2015 due to a $22.9 million decrease in variable compensation partially offset by an $8.3 million increase in salaries, wages and benefits. The variable compensation decrease was primarily due to decreases of $22.0$24.0 million in bonus expense based on our lower performance and $16.8 million from lower market valuations ofrelated to unvested mutual fund awards partially offset by increases of $12.3and $5.5 million in amortization of stock and stock unit awards and $3.5award amortization, partially offset by a $14.2 million related to private equity and other product performance fees. The increase in salaries, wages and benefits wasbonus expense primarily due to a $29.0 million increase from higher staffing levels and annual merit salary adjustments that were effective December 1, 2014, largely offset by $19.0 million of favorable currency impacts.levels.
Variable compensation as a percentage of compensation and benefits was 33%31%, 38%33% and 39%36% for fiscal years 20162019, 20152018 and 2014.2017. At September 30, 2016,2019, our global workforce had decreased to approximately 9,1009,600 employees from approximately 9,500 employees9,700 at September 30, 2015.2018.


43

Table of Contents

We continue to place a high emphasis on our pay for performance philosophy. As such, any changes in the underlying performance of our SIPsinvestment products or changes in the composition of our incentive compensation offerings could have an impact on compensation and benefit expenses going forward. However, in order to attract and retain talented individuals, our level of compensation and benefit expenses may increase more quickly or decrease more slowly than our revenue.



41

Table of Contents

Information Systems and Technology
Information systems and technology expenses decreased $17.0 million in fiscal year 2016 primarily due to lower technical consulting costs. Information systems and technology expenses increased $8.0$14.6 million in fiscal year 20152019 primarily due to higher software, technical consulting and external data service and software costs, and increased $24.1 million in fiscal year 2018 primarily due to higher technology consulting and software costs.
Details of capitalized information systems and technology costs are shown below.
(in millions)            
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Net carrying value at beginning of year $89.8
 $85.5
 $93.5
 $106.2
 $102.1
 $88.1
Additions, net of disposals 46.2
 50.8
 37.4
 53.8
 51.2
 63.1
Amortization (47.9) (46.5) (45.4) (48.0) (47.1) (49.1)
Net Carrying Value at End of Year $88.1
 $89.8
 $85.5
 $112.0
 $106.2
 $102.1
Occupancy
We conduct our worldwide operations using a combination of leased and owned facilities. Occupancy expenses include rent and other facilities-related costs including depreciation and utilities.
Occupancy expenses increased $1.4 million in fiscal year 2016 primarily due to higher rent expense, substantially offset by lower building maintenance costs and depreciation. Occupancy expenses decreased $5.0 million in fiscal year 20152019 primarily due to lowerhigher levels of rent expense and building depreciation and maintenance, costspartially offset by a $6.3 million decrease in equipment impairment. Occupancy expenses increased $7.3 million in fiscal year 2018 primarily due to $6.6 million of equipment impairment.
During the second half of fiscal year 2019 we completed construction of two new buildings at our corporate headquarters campus in San Mateo, California and property taxes.purchased an office building in Poznan, Poland. The additions of these new properties will result in increased annual depreciation and other occupancy expenses of approximately $12 million beginning in fiscal year 2020.
General, Administrative and Other
General, administrative and other operating expenses primarily consist of fund-related service fees payable to external parties, professional fees, advertising and promotion, costs, corporate travel and entertainment, and other miscellaneous expenses. Effective January 1, 2014, we assumed responsibility for certain operating expenses of our Canadian funds in exchange for an AUM-based administration fee.
General, administrative and other operating expenses decreased $8.4increased $23.0 million in fiscal year 20162019 primarily due to lower levelsa $13.9 million litigation settlement and higher third-party service fees, intangible asset amortization and professional fees. Third-party fees primarily for sub-advisory and fund administration services increased $13.7 million, including $8.6 million from the recognition of travelcertain payments reimbursed by funds as expense upon adoption of new revenue recognition accounting guidance on October 1, 2018. Intangible asset amortization increased $12.9 million and entertainment,professional fees increased $10.6 million, both primarily related to the current year acquisition of Benefit Street Partners, L.L.C. The increases were partially offset by decreases of $11.1 million in contingent consideration expense and advertising and promotion, partially offset by higher levels of net intangible asset expenses, consolidated SIPs expenses, professional fees and third-party servicing fees. Corporate cost reduction initiatives resulted in decreases of $14.7 million in corporate travel and entertainment expenses and $10.6 million in advertising and promotion expenses. The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability for the K2 Advisors Holdings, LLC (“K2”) acquisition, decreased $14.5$9.7 million in CIPs expenses and $8.6 million in advertising and promotion. The total consideration for the K2 acquisition was finalized during fiscal year 2019.
General, administrative and other operating expenses increased $75.5 million in fiscal year 2018 primarily due to loweredhigher contingent consideration expense, third-party service fees, professional fees, advertising and promotion, and travel and entertainment expenses. Contingent consideration expense increased $26.9 million due to revised estimates of K2s future revenues and profits. Net expensesprofits from definite-lived intangible assets,K2 and a prior-year decline in other acquisition-related AUM. Third-party fees primarily related to the K2 acquisition,for sub-advisory and fund administration services increased $10.3 million as $20.0 million of increased impairment due to higher investor redemptions, lower estimates of future sales and renegotiations of certain investment management fees was offset by a related $9.7 million decrease in amortization. Consolidated SIPs expenses increased $9.0$17.6 million, professional fees increased $6.2$16.6 million related to various corporate activities, and third-party service feesadvertising and promotion and travel and entertainment expenses increased $5.5$7.3 million primarilyand $6.6 million due to higher sub-advisory expenses.activity levels.
General, administrative and other operating expenses decreased $11.6 million in fiscal year 2015 primarily due to lower professional fees, consolidated SIPs expenses, third-party service fees and non-executive directors compensation, partially offset by intangible asset impairment and higher contingent consideration and Canadian fund expenses. Professional fees decreased $13.2 million primarily due to fees incurred in the prior year for various corporate activities including the winding down of our banking business. Consolidated SIPs expenses decreased $11.8 million. Third-party service fees decreased $5.1 million primarily due to lower AUM and fund-related service fees. Non-executive directors compensation decreased $4.4 million primarily due to the impact of a decrease in our stock price on the deferred portion. The decreases were partially offset by $8.2 million of impairment of definite-lived intangible assets, a $7.0 million increase in the change in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability for K2 primarily due to revised estimates of K2s future revenues and profits, and a $6.6 million increase in Canadian fund expenses.





4244

Table of Contents


We are committed to investing in advertising and promotion in response to changing business conditions, and to advance our products where we see continued or potential new growth opportunities. As a result of potential changes in our strategic marketing campaigns, the level of advertising and promotion expendituresexpenses may increase more rapidly, or decrease more slowly, than our revenues.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
Other income (expenses) were as follows:consisted of the following:
(in millions)       2016
vs. 2015
 2015
vs. 2014
       2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014  2019 2018 2017 
Investment and other income, net $184.0
 $40.4
 $235.8
 355% (83%) $115.1
 $145.3
 $336.3
 (21%) (57%)
Interest expense (49.9) (39.6) (47.4) 26% (16%) (24.7) (48.7) (51.5) (49%) (5%)
Other Income, Net $134.1
 $0.8
 $188.4
 NM
 (100%) $90.4
 $96.6
 $284.8
 (6%) (66%)
Investment and other income, net consists primarily of interestdividend and dividendinterest income, income (losses) from equity method investees, gains (losses) on trading investment securitiesinvestments held by the Company and investments of consolidated SIPs, realized gains (losses) on sale of available-for-sale investment securities,CIPs, rental income and foreign currency exchange gains (losses).
Other income, net increased $133.3decreased $6.2 million in fiscal year 20162019 primarily due to higher market valuations, which resultedlosses from equity method investees, as compared to income in net investmentthe prior year, lower interest income and losses on investments held by the Company, as compared to gains in the prior year. These decreases were largely offset by higher dividend income, lower losses on investments held by CIPs, lower interest expense and higher interest income, partially offset by unfavorable impacts from foreign currency exchange and investments of consolidated SIPs.gains. Equity method investees generated incomelosses of $56.7$10.4 million as compared to lossesincome of $63.2$44.4 million in the prior year and trading investment securities generated net gainsprimarily due to changes in market valuations of $50.1 million as compared to net losses of $22.3 million in the prior year.investments held by two global equity funds. Interest income increased $25.7decreased $45.5 million primarily due to higherlower levels of cash equivalents and debt securities, and cash equivalents. These increases were partially offset by $2.9higher interest rates. Investments held by the Company generated net losses of $9.7 million primarily due to $9.0 million of foreign currency exchange net lossesother-than-temporary impairment of an available-for-sale debt security, as compared to net gains of $57.0$6.0 million in the prior yearyear. The decreases were partially offset by a $45.9 million increase in dividend income primarily due to higher yields on, and investments in, money market funds, and a $28.7 million decrease in net losses on investments held by CIPs primarily from holdings of various global/international funds and a U.S. fixed income fund. Interest expense decreased $24.0 million primarily due to $12.5 million of prior-year costs related to early redemption of senior notes and lower debt balances. Net foreign currency exchange gains increased $12.5 million primarily from the impact of strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Euro on cash and $13.5 million of net losses on investments of consolidated SIPs as compared to net gains of $18.0 millioncash equivalents denominated in the prior year.U.S. dollars held in Europe.
Other income, net decreased $187.6$188.2 million in fiscal year 20152018 primarily due to losses on investments held by CIPs, lower market valuations, which resulted in net lossesincome from equity method investees and lower net gains on our investments. Equity method investees generated losses of $63.2 million as compared to income of $68.1 million in the prior year, net realized gains on sale of available-for-sale securities decreased $32.7 million, trading investment securities, incurredpartially offset by higher dividend income and foreign exchange gains. Investments held by CIPs generated net losses of $22.3$55.0 million, as compared to net gains of $10.4$118.2 million in the prior year,year. The losses were primarily from lower market valuations of holdings by an emerging markets equity fund with a significant exposure in Turkey, several global/international fixed income funds and neta U.S. fixed income fund. Income from equity method investees decreased $63.5 million primarily due to lower gains and losses on investments held by three global equity funds, one of which incurred losses on Turkish holdings, and a global macro hedge fund. Net gains on investments of consolidated SIPstrading investment securities decreased $15.9 million.$11.1 million primarily due to losses and lower gains from fixed income funds and other debt and equity securities. The market valuation decreases were partially offset by a $24.9$37.2 million increase in dividend income primarily due to higher investments in, and yields on, money market funds, and net foreign currency exchange gains of $0.6 million, as compared to net gainslosses of $16.0 million in the prior year, primarily from the impact of strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Euro.Euro on cash and cash equivalents denominated in U.S. dollars held in Europe.
Significant portions of the net gains (losses) of consolidated SIPsCIPs are offset in noncontrolling interests in our consolidated statements of income.
Our investments in SIPssponsored funds include initial cash investments made in the course of launching mutual fund and other investment product offerings, as well as investments for other business reasons. The market conditions that impact our AUM similarly affect the investment income earned or losses incurred on our SIPs investments.investments in sponsored funds.

We lease excess owned space in our San Mateo, California corporate headquarters and various other office buildings to third parties, from which we earned rental income of $19.8 million and $15.9 million in fiscal years 2019 and 2018. Additional leases taking effect in fiscal year 2020 are expected to increase annual rental income by approximately $9 million.




4345

Table of Contents


The consolidatedOur cash, cash equivalents and investments portfolio by investment objective and accounting classification at September 30, 2016, including2019, excluding third-party assets of consolidated SIPs and variable interest entities (“VIEs”),CIPs, was as follows:
 
Accounting Classification 1
 Total Direct Portfolio
(in millions) Total Portfolio Percent of Total Portfolio Trading Securities Included in Portfolio Percent of Total Trading Securities Assets of Consolidated SIPs and VIEs Included in Total Portfolio Percent of Total 
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Other 2
 Equity Securities,
at
Fair Value
 Equity Method Investments 
Direct Investments
in CIPs
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents $8,483.3
 68% $
 0% $236.2
 14% $5,803.4
 $
 $
 $
 $5,803.4
Investment Securities            
Investments          
Equity                      
Global/international 692.4
 6% 6.1
 0% 657.4
 37% 9.3
 111.3
 603.4
 133.3
 857.3
United States 4.3
 0% 0.3
 0% 2.7
 0% 8.1
 5.5
 13.2
 48.1
 74.9
Total equity 696.7
 6% 6.4
 0% 660.1
 37% 17.4
 116.8
 616.6
 181.4
 932.2
Hybrid 224.2
 2% 75.3
 7% 81.5
 5%
Multi-Asset/Balanced 3.1
 19.9
 39.5
 109.7
 172.2
Fixed Income                      
Tax-free 1.6
 0% 
 0% 
 0% 
 
 
 6.1
 6.1
Taxable                      
Global/international 1,022.3
 8% 578.9
 52% 264.7
 15% 43.0
 197.8
 125.6
 627.7
 994.1
United States 991.9
 8% 461.3
 41% 507.1
 29% 28.9
 195.5
 151.7
 206.7
 582.8
Total fixed income 2,015.8
 16% 1,040.2
 93% 771.8
 44% 71.9
 393.3
 277.3
 840.5
 1,583.0
Total investment securities 2,936.7
 24% 1,121.9
 100% 1,513.4
 86%
Other Investments 993.3
 8% 
 0% 
 0%
Total investments 92.4
 530.0
 933.4
 1,131.6
 2,687.4
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments $12,413.3
 100% $1,121.9
 100% $1,749.6
 100% $5,895.8
 $530.0
 $933.4
 $1,131.6
 $8,490.8
Investments of consolidated SIPs and VIEs are generally assigned a classification in the table above based on the investment objective of the consolidated entity holding the securities. Other investments include $709.6 million of investments in equity method investees that hold securities that are subject to market valuation risks and primarily have a global/international equity investment objective. ______________
1
See Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies, Note 2 – New Accounting Guidance and Note 6 – Investments in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10‑K for information on investment accounting classifications.
2
Other consists of $48.2 million of debt securities and $11.5 million of investments in life settlement contracts, both of which are measured at fair value, and $32.7 million of investments carried at adjusted cost.
TAXES ON INCOME
As a multi-national corporation, we provide many of our services from locations outsideThe Tax Act, which was enacted into law in the U.S. Some of these jurisdictions have lowerin December 2017, includes various changes to the tax rates than the U.S. Additionally, in certain countries our income is subject to reduced tax rates due to tax rulings. The mix of pre-tax income subject to these lower rates, when aggregated with income originatinglaw, including a permanent reduction in the U.S., produces a lower overall effectivecorporate income tax rate than existingfrom 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and assessment of a one-time transition tax on the deemed repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign subsidiaries’ earnings. We completed our analysis of the Tax Act impact during the quarter ended December 31, 2018 with no significant adjustment to the provisional amounts previously recorded. The transition tax expense recognized in fiscal year 2018 was net of an $87.6 million tax benefit related to U.S. federal and state income tax rates.taxation of deemed foreign dividends. This benefit was reversed in fiscal year 2019 upon issuance of final regulations by the U.S. Department of Treasury.
Our effective income tax rate for fiscal year 20162019 was 29.7%26.8% as compared to 30.5%66.5% in fiscal year 20152018 and 29.3%29.8% in fiscal year 2014.2017. The rate decrease in fiscal year 20162019 was primarily due to a higher mixthe prior year impact of earnings inthe transition tax, net of the tax benefit from the revaluation of net deferred tax liabilities at the lower tax jurisdictionsstatutory rate, and the current year impact of the lower 21% statutory rate as compared to the prior-year blended statutory rate of 24.5%, partially offset by a decrease in net income attributablethe reversal of the tax benefit related to noncontrolling interests.the U.S. taxation of deemed foreign dividends. The rate increase in fiscal year 20152018 was primarily due to a higher mixthe impact of earnings in higherthe transition tax, jurisdictions and higher non-U.S. taxes following an income tax ruling effective October 1, 2014, partially offset by the recognitionlower federal statutory rate and the net tax benefit from the revaluation of net deferred tax benefits as a result of the expiration of statutes of limitations in various U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions and an increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.
Theliabilities. Our effective income tax rate excluding the one-time impacts of the Tax Act was 21.6% and 22.7% for future reporting periods will continue to reflectfiscal years 2019 and 2018.
Our effective income tax rate reflects the relative contributions of non-U.S. earnings that are subject to reducedin the jurisdictions in which we operate, which have varying tax rates. Changes in our pre-tax income mix, tax rates and that are not currently includedor tax legislation in U.S. taxable income. Changes in tax rates in thesethe jurisdictions may affect our effective income tax rate and net income.





4446

Table of Contents


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash flows were as follows:
(in millions)            
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Cash Flow Data      
Operating cash flows $1,727.7
 $2,252.0
 $2,138.0
 $201.6
 $2,229.7
 $1,135.4
Investing cash flows 192.2
 248.9
 390.6
 (1,077.1) (290.4) 52.0
Financing cash flows (1,800.7) (1,612.2) (1,195.3) (40.5) (3,761.7) (956.0)
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased in fiscal year 20162019 primarily due to a decrease inactivities of CIPs which had net income and losses frompurchases of investments in equity method investees as compared to incomenet liquidations in the prior year. Net cash provided byused in investing activities decreased mainlyincreased primarily due to lower liquidations, net of purchases, ofcash paid for the Companys investments and investments of consolidated SIPs,BSP acquisition and higher net additions of property and equipment partially offsetprimarily related to construction of two new buildings at our corporate headquarters campus in San Mateo, California and a purchased office building in Poznan, Poland. Net cash used in financing activities decreased primarily due to lower dividends paid on, and repurchases of, common stock, higher net subscriptions in CIPs by highernoncontrolling interests, and a prior-year debt payment.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased in fiscal year 2018 primarily due to activities of CIPs which had net liquidations of investments as compared to net purchases in the prior year, partially offset by consolidated VIEs.an increase in our investments as compared to a decrease in the prior year. Net cash used in investing activities, as compared to net cash provided in the prior year, primarily resulted from net purchases of other investments by CIPs, as compared to net liquidations in the prior year, and higher cash paid for acquisitions. Net cash used in financing activities increased primarily due to higher repurchases of common stock, prior-year proceeds from issuance of debt, net of repayments, and net distributions from consolidated SIPs by noncontrolling interests as compared to net subscriptions in the prior year, partially offset by lower dividends paid on common stock.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased in fiscal year 2015, despite a decrease in net income, primarily due to a lower net increase in trading securities of consolidated SIPs, a decrease in receivables, prepaid expenses and other as compared to an increase in the prior year and losses from investments in equity method investees as compared to income in the prior year, partially offset by a decrease in other liabilities as compared to an increase in the prior year which primarily resulted from the consolidation impact of short positions of consolidated SIPs. Net cash provided by investing activities decreased mainly due to proceeds from the sale of, and net decreases in, loans receivable in the prior year, and lower liquidations, net of purchases, of the Companys investments and investments of consolidated VIEs, partially offset by net liquidations of investments by consolidated SIPs as compared to net purchases in the prior year, and an increase in cash and cash equivalents from net consolidation of SIPs as compared to a decrease from net deconsolidation in the prior year. Net cash used in financing activities increased primarily due to higher repurchases of, and dividends paid on common stock, and lower net subscriptions in consolidated SIPsCIPs by noncontrolling interests and higher repurchases of common stock, partially offset by a decrease in deposits in the prior year and proceeds from issuance oflower payments on debt net of repayments.by CIPs.
The assets and liabilities of our consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEsCIPs attributable to third-party investors do not impact our liquidity and capital resources. We have no right to these consolidated entitiesthe CIPs’ assets, other than our direct equity investment in them and/orand investment management and other fees earned from them. The debt holders of these consolidated entitiesthe CIPs have no recourse to our assets beyond the level of our direct investment, therefore we bear no other risks associated with the entitiesCIPs’ liabilities. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of our consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs,CIPs, other than our direct investments in them, are excluded from the amounts and discussion below.
Our liquid assets and debt consisted of the following:
(in millions)      
as of September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $8,247.1
 $8,184.9
 $7,476.8
Receivables 746.4
 816.5
 910.8
Investments 1,896.7
 2,105.8
 2,239.2
Total Liquid Assets $10,890.2
 $11,107.2
 $10,626.8
Liability      
Debt $1,401.2
 $1,348.0
 $1,198.2



45

Table of Contents

(in millions)      
as of September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $5,803.4
 $6,610.8
 $8,523.3
Receivables 740.0
 733.7
 767.8
Investments 2,029.4
 2,130.6
 1,995.2
Total Liquid Assets $8,572.8
 $9,475.1
 $11,286.3
       
Liability      
Debt $696.9
 $695.9
 $1,044.2
Liquidity
Liquid assets consist of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and certain investments. Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2019 primarily consist of debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less at the purchase date, money market funds time deposits with maturities of three months or less, and deposits with financial institutions. Liquid investments consist of trading and available-for-sale securities, investments in equity method investees consisting of mutual fund SIPs,sponsored and other funds, direct investments in redeemable consolidated SIPs,CIPs, other equity and debt securities, and time deposits with maturities greater than three months.
Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2016 increased primarily due to net cash provided by operating and investing activities, partially offset by net cash used in financing activities. The percentages

47

Table of cash and cash equivalents held by our U.S. and non-U.S. operations were 28% and 72% at September 30, 2016, and 33% and 67% at September 30, 2015.Contents

We utilize a significant portion of our liquid assets to satisfy operational and regulatory requirements and fund capital contributions relating to our SIPs.sponsored and other products. Certain of our subsidiaries are required by our internal policy or regulation to maintain minimum levels of capital, which are partially maintained by retaining cash and cash equivalents. As a result, such subsidiaries may be restricted in their ability to transfer cash to their parent companies. Also, as a multi-national corporation, we operate in various locations outside of the U.S. Certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are subjectLiquid assets used to satisfy these purposes were $3,429.0 million at September 30, 2019 and $3,382.6 million at September 30, 2018, including $263.3 million and $252.6 million that was restricted by regulatory or contractual repatriation restrictions or requirements. Such restrictions and requirements limit our ability to transfer cash between various international jurisdictions, including repatriation to the U.S. Should we require more capital in the U.S. than is generated domestically,available for use, we could elect to reduce the level of discretionary activities, such as share repurchases or investments in sponsored and other products, or we could elect to repatriate future earnings from non-U.S. jurisdictions or raise capital through debt or equity issuance. Certain of theseThese alternatives could result in higher effective tax rates, increased interest expense, decreased dividend or interest income, or other dilution to our earnings. At September 30, 2016, our U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries held $874.6 million and $2,220.8 million of liquid assets to satisfy operational and regulatory requirements and fund capital contributions to our SIPs, as compared to $1,152.0 million and $1,732.7 million held at September 30, 2015. Included in these amounts were U.S. and non-U.S. liquid assets that were restricted from transfer to Franklin and other subsidiaries of $4.7 million and $345.7 million at September 30, 2016 and $105.8 million and $404.0 million at September 30, 2015.
Capital Resources
We believe that we can meet our present and reasonably foreseeable operating cash needs and future commitments through existing liquid assets, continuing cash flows from operations, the ability to issue debt or equity securities and borrowing capacity under our uncommitted private placement program.
In prior fiscal years, we issued senior unsecured unsubordinated notes for general corporate purposes, to redeem outstanding notes and to finance an acquisition. At September 30, 20162019, $1,348.5$699.4 million of the notes were outstanding with an aggregate face value of $1,350.0700.0 million. The notes were issued at fixed interest rates and consist of $300.0 million at 1.375%2.80% per annum which mature in 2017, $350.02022 and $400.0 million at 4.625%2.85% per annum which mature in 2020, $300.0 million at 2.800% per annum which mature in 2022, and $400.0 million at 2.850% per annum which mature in 2025.
Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually. The notes contain an optional redemption feature that allows us to redeem each series of notes prior to maturity in whole or in part at any time, at a make-whole redemption price. The indentures governing the notes contain limitations on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to pledge voting stock or profit participating equity interests in our subsidiaries to secure other debt without similarly securing the notes equally and ratably. The indentures also include requirements that must be met if we consolidate or merge with, or sell all of our assets to, another entity.
In March 2016, we borrowed 6.3 billion Indian Rupees ($93.4 million) at a fixed interest rate of 9.89% to purchase certain securities from SIPs domiciled in India. Interest on the loan is payable monthly, and the loan may be prepaid without penalty. To secure the loan, we concurrently entered into a standby letter of credit for 6.5 billion Indian Rupees ($96.6 million) collateralized by a $116.0 million time deposit. The loan agreement requires that the borrowing entity, a subsidiary located in India, maintain a specified minimum level of capital. In September 2016,we prepaid 2.8 billion Indian Rupees ($41.2 million) of the loan. The loan had a carrying value of $52.7 million at September 30, 2016.
We were in compliance with all debt covenants at September 30, 2016.2019.
At September 30, 2016,2019, we had $500.0 million of short-term commercial paper available for issuance under an uncommitted private placement program which has been inactive since 2012.



46

Table of Contents

2012 and is unrated.
Our ability to access the capital markets in a timely manner depends on a number of factors, including our credit rating, the condition of the global economy, investors’ willingness to purchase our securities, interest rates, credit spreads and the valuation levels of equity markets. If we are unable to access capital markets in a timely manner, our business could be adversely impacted.
Uses of Capital
We expect that our main uses of cash will be to invest in and grow our business, acquirerepurchase shares of our common stock, invest in our SIPs,products, fund property and equipment purchases, pay operating expenses of the business, enhance technology infrastructure and business processes, pay stockholder dividends and income taxes, and repay and service debt.
We repatriate the earnings in excess of regulatory, capital or operational requirements for substantially all non-U.S. subsidiaries. Prior to January 1, 2018, we indefinitely reinvested the undistributed earnings of all non-U.S. subsidiaries, except for income previously taxed in the U.S. or subject to regulatory or legal repatriation restrictions or requirements.
We declare dividends on a quarterly basis. We declared regular cash dividends of $0.72$1.04 per share ($0.180.26 per share per quarter) in fiscal year 20162019, and regular cash dividends of $0.60$0.92 per share ($0.150.23 per share per quarter) and a special cash dividend of $0.50$3.00 per share in fiscal year 20152018. We currently expect to continue paying comparable regular cash dividends on a quarterly basis to holders of our common stock depending upon earnings and other relevant factors.
We maintain a stock repurchase program to manage our equity capital with the objective of maximizing shareholder value. Our stock repurchase program is effected through regular open-market purchases and private transactions in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
regulations, and is not subject to an expiration date. The size and timing of these purchases will depend on price, market and business conditions and other factors. During fiscal years 20162019 and 2015,2018, we repurchased 36.624.6 million and 22.539.9 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $1,324.3756.3 million and $1,059.81,426.7 million. In June 2016 and October 2015, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 50.0 million and 30.0 million additional shares of our common stock under the stock repurchase program. At September 30, 2016, 50.72019, 47.2 million shares remained available for repurchase under the program, which is not subject to an expiration date.authorization of 80.0 million shares approved by our Board of Directors in April 2018.
During

48

Table of Contents

We invested $128.0 million, net of redemptions, in our sponsored products during fiscal years 2016year 2019, and 2015, we redeemed $514.2 million and $70.0$105.9 million, net of investments, fromduring fiscal year 2018.
On February 1, 2019, we acquired all of the outstanding ownership interests in Benefit Street Partners L.L.C., a U.S. alternative credit manager, for a purchase consideration of $720.1 million in cash. During fiscal year 2018, we paid $86.8 million, net of cash acquired, and issued 0.8 million shares of our SIPs.common stock related to acquisitions.
During fiscal year 2019, we completed construction of two new buildings at our corporate headquarters campus in San Mateo, California with a total cost of approximately $130 million and purchased an office building in Poznan, Poland with a total cost of approximately $86 million. The buildings are used in our business operations, and portions of the space may be leased to third parties.
On May 21, 2018, we redeemed our outstanding $350.0 million 4.625% senior notes due in May 2020 at a make-whole redemption price of $361.9 million.
The funds that we manage have their own resources available for purposes of providing liquidity to meet shareholder redemptions, including securities that can be sold or provided to investors as in-kind redemptions, and lines of credit. While we have no legal or contractual obligation to do so, we may voluntarily elect to provide the funds with direct or indirect financial support based on our business objectives. We did not provide financial or other support to our sponsored funds during fiscal year 2019. During fiscal year 2016,2018, we purchased $182.7$32.6 million of certain equity and debt securities from six SIPs domiciled in India in order to provide additional liquidity to the SIPs.two sponsored funds.



47

Table of Contents

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITYCOMMITMENTS
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations commitments and contingent liability.commitments.
(in millions) Payments Due by Fiscal Year
as of September 30, 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 There-after Total
Debt              
Principal1
 $352.4
 $
 $
 $349.9
 $
 $698.9
 $1,401.2
Interest 42.9
 36.0
 36.0
 36.0
 19.8
 48.3
 219.0
Operating leases 44.7
 43.1
 39.0
 31.6
 28.0
 190.2
 376.6
Purchase obligations2
 119.9
 116.3
 63.1
 11.9
 4.7
 7.2
 323.1
Total Contractual Obligations 559.9
 195.4
 138.1
 429.4
 52.5
 944.6
 2,319.9
Committed capital contributions3
 35.2
 
 
 
 
 
 35.2
Contingent consideration liability4
 38.1
 37.9
 40.2
 
 
 
 116.2
Total Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingent Liability $633.2
 $233.3
 $178.3
 $429.4
 $52.5
 $944.6
 $2,471.3
(in millions) Payments Due by Fiscal Year
as of September 30, 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 There-
after
 Total
Debt              
Principal 1
 $0.2
 $
 $300.0
 $
 $
 $400.0
 $700.2
Interest 19.8
 19.8
 19.8
 11.4
 11.4
 5.7
 87.9
Operating leases 49.5
 45.3
 40.9
 39.1
 36.7
 149.1
 360.6
Purchase obligations 2
 158.6
 75.6
 28.9
 16.8
 17.1
 0.6
 297.6
Total Contractual Obligations 228.1
 140.7
 389.6
 67.3
 65.2
 555.4
 1,446.3
Committed capital contributions 3
 267.8
 
 
 
 
 
 267.8
Federal transition tax liability 4
 49.9
 74.1
 74.1
 74.1
 138.9
 416.8
 827.9
Total Contractual Obligations and Commitments $545.8
 $214.8
 $463.7
 $141.4
 $204.1
 $972.2
 $2,542.0
__________________ 
1 
Debt principal represents carryingmaturity amount.
2 
Purchase obligations include contractual amounts that will be due to purchase goods and services to be used in our operations and may be canceled at earlier times than those indicated under certain conditions that may include termination fees.
3 
Committed capital contributions relate to discretionary commitments to invest in SIPssponsored funds and other investment products.products and entities. Generally, the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown as they are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment periods.
4 
Contingent consideration liability relates toTransition tax on the Company’s commitment to acquiredeemed repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign subsidiaries’ earnings under the remaining interests in K2.Tax Act.
The debt holders of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEsCIPs have no recourse to our assets beyond the level of our direct investments, therefore we bear no risks associated with these entities liabilities and have not included them in the table above. See Note 911Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.10‑K.
At September 30, 20162019, our consolidated balance sheet included liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits of $82.1202.6 million and related accrued interest of $9.611.9 million (see Note 1013 – Taxes on Income in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K)10‑K). Because of the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing and amounts of future cash outflows, unrecognized tax benefits and related accrued interest haveare not been included in the table above.


49

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. These estimates, judgments and assumptions are affected by our application of accounting policies. Actual results maycould differ from those estimates under different assumptions.the estimates. Described below are the accounting policies that we believe are most critical to understanding our financial position and results of operations. For additional information about our accounting policies, see Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.10‑K.
Consolidation
We consolidate our subsidiaries and SIPsinvestment products in which we have a controlling financial interest. We have a controlling financial interest when we own a majority of the voting interest in ana voting interest entity (“VOE”) or are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. We also consolidate non-VIE limited partnerships and similar structures that we control.variable interest entity (“VIE”).



48

Table of Contents

A VIE is an entity in which the equity investment holders have not contributed sufficient capital to finance its activities or the equity investment holders do not have defined rights and obligations normally associated with an equity investment. The assessment of whether an entity is a VIE or voting interest entity (“VOE”)VOE involves judgment and analysis on a structure by structurestructure-by-structure basis. When performing the assessment we consider factors such as the entitys legal organization and capital structure, the rights of the equity investment holders and our contractual involvement with and ownership interest in the entity. OurSubstantially all of our VIEs are all investment entitiesproducts and our variable interests consist of our equity ownership interests in and/orand investment management fees earned from these entities.products.
A limited partnership or similar structure entity for which we are the general partner or managing member, our aggregate investment is not substantive and the limited partners or other investors do not have the substantive ability to remove us as the general partner or managing member or otherwise participate in the decision making of the entity is a VIE. Otherwise the entity is a VOE and we are presumed to control the entity unless the limited partners or other investors have the substantive ability to remove us as the general partner or managing member or otherwise participate in the decision-making of the entity.
We use two models for determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of VIEs. For all VIEs with the exception of CLOs, we are the primary beneficiary if we have the majority of the risks or rewards of ownership, which we determine using expected cash flows scenarios. For CLOs, we are the primary beneficiarya VIE if we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of or right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
Under both models, Investment management fees earned from VIEs are excluded from the primary beneficiary determination if they are deemed to be at market and commensurate with service. The key estimates and assumptions used in the analyses include the amount of AUM investment management fee rates,and the life of the investment product, prepayment rates, and the discount rate.product. These estimates and assumptions are subject to variability. For example, AUM is impacted by market volatility and the level of sales, redemptions, contributions, withdrawalsdistributions to investors and dividend reinvestments of mutual fund shares that occur daily. In addition, third-party purchases and redemptions, which are outside of our control, can impact our evaluation. Collateralized assets of CLOs are impacted by market volatility and prepayment rates.reinvested distributions. There is judgment involved in assessing whether we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact VIEsVIEs’ economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of or right to receive benefits from VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. As of September 30, 20162019, we were the primary beneficiary of three CLOs37 investment product VIEs.
Business Combinations
Business combinations are accounted for by recognizing the acquired assets, including separately identifiable intangible assets, and one other SIP VIE.
Fair Value Measurements
We use a three-levelassumed liabilities at their acquisition-date estimated fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. The three levels of fair value hierarchy are set forth below. Our assessmentvalues. Any excess of the hierarchy levelpurchase consideration over the acquisition-date fair values of thethese identifiable assets orand liabilities measured at fair value is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant torecognized as goodwill. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded in its entirety.earnings.
Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2Observable inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices, such as non-binding quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or corroborated by observable market data. Level 2 quoted prices are generally obtained from two independent third-party brokers or dealers, including prices derived from model-based valuation techniques for which the significant assumptions are observable in the market or corroborated by observable market data. Quoted prices are validated through price variance analysis, subsequent sales testing, stale price review, price comparison across pricing vendors and due diligence reviews of third-party vendors.
Level 3Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. These inputs require significant management judgment and reflect our estimation of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Intangible assets acquired in business combinations consist of investment management contracts. The fair values for Level 3 assets and liabilities are determined using various methodologies in accordance with our global valuation and pricing policy which defines valuation and pricing conventions for each security type. When available, we measure fair value based on the reported net asset value (“NAV”) of underlying investments or independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes. These inputs are evaluated for reasonableness through various procedures which include due diligence reviews of the third parties, price comparisons across pricing vendors, stale price reviews and subsequent sales testing. If these inputsacquired intangible assets are not available, we primarily employ a market-based method, using purchase multiples observed for comparable third-party transactions, valuations of comparable entities, projected operating results of the investee entity or



49

Table of Contents

subsequent financing transactions entered into by the investee entity. If the inputs for a market-based method are not available, we utilize an income-based method, which considersbased on the net present value of anticipatedestimated future cash flows attributable to the contracts, which include significant assumptions about forecasts of the investment. AAUM growth rate, pre-tax profit margin, average effective fee rate, effective tax rate and discount may be applied due to the nature or duration of any restrictions on the disposition of the investment. We review and approve the market-based and income-based methods on a periodic basis for changes that would impact the unobservable inputs incorporated into the valuation process. The fair value measurements from these methodsrate. Our estimates are further validated through price variance analysis, subsequent sales testing and market comparable sales.
We record a substantial amount of our investments at fair value or amounts that approximate fair value on a recurring basis. The financial assets and financial liabilities of consolidated CLOs are measured using the more observable fair value of either the financial assets or financial liabilities. Fair values are estimated for disclosure purposes for financial instruments that are not measured at fair value.
As of September 30, 2016, Level 3 assets represented 30% of total assets measured at fair value, substantially all of which related to consolidated SIPs investments in equity and debt securities and our direct investments in debt securities that are not traded in active markets. There was one Level 3 liability, a contingent consideration liability which represented 92% of total liabilities measured at fair value. There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 during fiscal year 2016.
Following are descriptions of the significant assets and liabilities measured at fair value, including the fair value methodologies used and hierarchy levels.
Investment Securities, Trading consist primarily of nonconsolidated SIPs and to a lesser extent, debt and other equity securities. The fair value of the SIPs is determined based on their published NAVassumptions believed to be reasonable, but are inherently uncertain and they are classified as Level 1. The fair values of certain debtunpredictable and, the other equity securities are primarily determined using quoted market prices, if available, or independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes, which are evaluated for reasonableness, and they are classified Level 2. The fair value of other debt securities is determined using discounted cash flow techniques and they are classified as Level 3.
Investment Securities, Available-for-Sale consist primarily of nonconsolidated SIPs and to a lesser extent, debt and other equity securities. The fair value of the SIPs is determined based on their published NAV and they are classified as Level 1. The fair value of the debt securities is primarily determined using independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes and they are classified as Level 2. The fair value of other equity securities is determined using quoted market prices and they are classified as Level 1.
Investment securities, available-for-sale are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis when the cost of an investment exceeds its fair value. We consider many factors, including the severity and duration of the decline in fair value below cost, our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery in fair value, and the financial condition and specific events related to the issuer.
Investments of Consolidated SIPs consist of trading securities and other investments that are not generally traded in active markets. The fair value of the trading securities is determined using quoted market prices, or independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes if quoted market prices are not available. These securities are classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The quoted market prices may be adjusted if events occur, such as significant price changes in U.S.-traded market proxies after the close of corresponding foreign markets, trade halts or suspensions, or unscheduled market closures. The market proxies consist of correlated country-specific exchange-traded securities such as futures, American Depositary Receipts indices or exchange-traded funds. The price adjustments are primarily determined based on third-party factors derived from model-based valuation techniques for which the significant assumptions are observable in the market.
The investments that are not generally traded in active markets consist of debt and equity securities of entities in emerging markets and fund products. The fair values of the debt and equity securities are determined using significant unobservable inputs in either a market-based or income-based approach and they are classified as Level 3. The fair value of the fund products is determined using NAV as a practical expedient. These investments are classified as Level 2 if they are redeemable without restriction on at least a quarterly basis, or Level 3 if they have a redemption frequency greater than quarterly, are subject to redemption restrictions, or are nonredeemable.
Investments of Consolidated VIEs consist substantially of corporate debt securities.result, may differ from actual results. The fair value is primarily obtained from independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes and they are classified as Level 2.



50

Table of Contents

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets consist of investment management contracts resulting from business acquisitions. We amortize these intangible assetsare amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from sixthree to 15 years, using the straight-line method, unless the asset is determined to have an indefinite useful life. Indefinite-lived intangible assets represent contracts to manage investment assets for which there is no foreseeable limit on the contract period.
We make significant estimates and assumptions when valuing goodwill and other intangible assets in connection with the initial purchase price allocation of an acquired entity, as well as when evaluating impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets on an ongoing basis.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually and when an event occurs or circumstances change that more likely than not reduce the fair value of the related reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset below its carrying value. We have one reporting unit, investment management and related services, consistent with our single operating segment, to which all goodwill has been assigned.We make significant estimates and assumptions when evaluating goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment.


50

Table of Contents

We may first assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. The qualitative analysis considers entity-specific and macroeconomic factors and their potential impact on the key assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset. A quantitative impairment test is performed if the results of the qualitative assessment indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the related reporting unit is less than its carrying value or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, or if a qualitative assessment is not performed.
The quantitative goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value is less than the fair value, no impairment exists and the second step is not performed. If the carrying value is higher than the fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In the second step, impairment is computed by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying value of the goodwill.
The quantitative indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test compares Quantitative tests compare the fair value of the asset to its carrying value. If the carrying value is higher than the
The fair value, impairment is recognized in the amount of the difference in values.
In estimating the fair valuevalues of the reporting unit and indefinite-lived intangible assets we use valuation techniquesare based on an income approach under whichthe net present value of estimated future cash flows, are discounted. Our future cash flow estimateswhich include significant assumptions about revenue andthe AUM growth rates, therate, pre-tax profit margin, the average effective fee rate, the effective tax rate and the discount rate, which is based on our weighted average cost of capital.rate. The most relevant of these assumptions to the determination of estimated fair value are the AUM growth rate, pre-tax profit margin and the discount rate.
We performed our annual impairment tests for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of August 1, 20162019. We did not recognize any impairment onperformed a quantitative test for goodwill orand the majority of indefinite-lived intangible assets, becauseand recognized $9.3 million of impairment of intangible assets related to Canadian management contracts due to revised estimates of future pre-tax profit margins and AUM growth rates for the associated fund products. The estimated fair values of ourthe reporting unit and oursubstantially all of the other indefinite-lived intangible assets exceeded their carrying values by more than 100%55%. We estimated the discounted future cash flows for goodwill and 81% of our indefinite-lived intangible assets using 4.0% and 1.5% compounded annual AUM growth rates ranging from (3.0%) to 4.0%, and for indefinite-lived intangible assets from (0.1%) to 12.7%, which were developed taking into account ongoing volatility in the capital markets, and a discount rate of 11.2%.9.3%, which is based on our weighted average cost of capital. A hypothetical 500 basis point decline in the AUM growth raterates or a 500 basis point increase in the discount rate would not reduce the estimated fair values of ourthe reporting unit or other indefinite-lived intangible assets below their carrying values.
We performed a qualitative assessment for 37% of the indefinite-lived intangible assets and concluded it is more likely than not that the fair value of the specific intangible assets exceeds their carrying value.
We subsequently monitormonitored market conditions and their potential impact on the assumptions used in the annual calculations of fair value to determine whether circumstances have changed that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of ourthe reporting unit below its carrying value, or indicate that ourthe other indefinite-lived intangible assets might be impaired. We considered, among other things, changes in our AUM and weighted-average cost of capital by assessing whether these changes would impact the reasonableness of the assumptions used in ourthe impairment tests as of August 1, 20162019. We also monitored fluctuations of our common stock per share price to evaluate our market capitalization relative to the reporting unit as a whole. Subsequent to August 1, 20162019, there were no impairments toof goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets as no events occurred or circumstances changed that would indicate these assets might be impaired.



51

Table of Contents

We test definite-lived intangible assets for impairment quarterly. Impairment is indicated when the carrying value of thean asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. In evaluating the recoverability of definite-lived intangible assets, we estimate theRecoverability is evaluated based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows to be derived from these assets. Our future undiscounted cash flow projections includeusing assumptions about revenue andthe AUM growth rates, effective fee rates, investor redemptions, therate, pre-tax profit margin, average effective fee rate and expected useful lives, which are developed taking into consideration ongoing market conditions.life. The most relevant of these assumptions to determine future cash flows is the AUM growth rate. If the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable through the related undiscounted cash flows, the impairment loss is measured based onrecognized in the amount by which the carrying value ofexceeds the asset exceeds its fair value. Theasset’s fair value, of the asset isas determined by discounted cash flows or other methods as appropriate for the asset type.
As of September 30, 2016, the undiscounted future cash flow projections for substantially all of our definite-lived intangible assets exceeded their carrying values by at least 60%. We estimated the future undiscounted cash flows for these assets using AUM growth rates ranging from (12.0%) to 2.0%. As of September 30, 2016, a decline in these assets related AUM of 43% could cause us to evaluate whether their fair value is below the carrying value. We recognized $28.2$4.0 million of impairment of definite-lived intangible assets during fiscal year 20162019 primarily due to declines inlower AUM growth rate and effective fee rate assumptions.
While we believe that the assumptions used to estimate fair value in our impairment tests are reasonable and appropriate, future changes in the assumptions could result in recognition of additional impairment.
Fair Value Measurements
A substantial amount of our investments is recorded at fair value or amounts that approximate fair value on a recurring basis. We use a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. The assessment of the hierarchy level of the assets or liabilities measured at fair value is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. See Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10‑K for more information on the fair value hierarchy.


51

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2019, Level 3 assets represented 22% of total assets measured at fair value, substantially all of which related to CIPs investments in equity and debt securities, and real estate. There were $36.1 million of transfers out of, and insignificant transfers into, Level 3 during fiscal year 2019.
Following are descriptions of the significant assets measured at fair value and their fair value methodologies.
Equity Securities, at fair value consist primarily of nonconsolidated sponsored funds and to a lesser extent, other equity securities. Changes in the fair value of the investments are recognized as gains and losses in earnings. The fair values of funds are determined based on their published NAV or estimated using NAV as a practical expedient. The fair values of equity securities other than funds are determined using independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes or based on discounted cash flows using significant unobservable inputs.
Debt Securities consist of trading and available-for-sale securities and are carried at fair value. Changes in the fair value of trading securities are recognized as gains and losses in earnings. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded net of tax as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized, at which time they are recognized in earnings using the average cost method. The fair values of debt securities are determined using independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes or based on discounted cash flows using significant unobservable inputs.
Investments of CIPs consist of marketable debt and equity securities and other investments that are not generally traded in active markets, and are carried at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the investments are recognized as gains and losses in earnings. The fair values of marketable securities are determined using quoted market prices, or independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes if quoted market prices are not available. The investments that are not generally traded in active markets consist of equity and debt securities of entities in emerging markets, fund products, other equity and debt instruments, real estate and loans. The fair values are determined using significant unobservable inputs in either a market-based or income-based approach, except for fund products, for which fair values are estimated using NAV as a practical expedient.
Revenues
InvestmentWe earn revenue primarily from providing investment management and related services to our customers. In addition to investment management, services include fund administration, sales and distribution, and shareholder servicing feesservicing. Revenues are recognized when our obligations related to the services are satisfied and it is probable that a significant reversal of the revenue amount would not occur in future periods. The obligations are satisfied over time as earned over the period in which services are rendered, except for performance-based investment management fees, which are recognized when earned. Sales commissions related tothe sales and distribution obligations for the sale of shares of SIPssponsored funds, which are recognizedsatisfied on trade date. InvestmentMultiple services included in customer contracts are accounted for separately when the obligations are determined to be distinct. Management judgement is involved in assessing the probability of significant revenue reversal and in the identification of distinct services.
Fees from providing investment management fees,and fund administration services (“investment management fees”), other than performance-based fees, and distributioninvestment management fees, are determined based on a percentage of AUM, primarily on a monthly basis using daily average daily AUM.AUM, and are recognized as the services are performed over time. Performance-based investment management fees are based ongenerated when investment products’ performance exceeds targets established in customer contracts. These fees are recognized when the relatedamount is no longer probable of significant reversal and may relate to investment management contracts. Shareholder servicingservices that were provided in prior periods.
Sales and distribution fees primarily consist of upfront sales commissions and ongoing distribution fees. Sales commissions are based on contractual rates for sales of certain classes of sponsored funds and are recognized on trade date. Distribution service fees are generally calculateddetermined based on a percentage of AUM, primarily on a monthly basis using daily average AUM. As the numberfee amounts are uncertain on trade date, they are recognized over time as the amounts become known and type of accounts serviced.may relate to sales and distribution services provided in prior periods.
AUM is generally based on the fair value of the underlying securities held by SIPsinvestment products and is calculated using fair value methods derived primarily from unadjusted quoted market prices, unadjusted independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes in active markets, or market prices or price quotes adjusted for observable price movements after the close of the primary market. The fair values of the underlying securities for which market prices are not readily available are valued internally valued using various methodologies which incorporate significant unobservable inputs as appropriate for each security type.
Pricing of the securities held by SIPs is governed by our global valuation and pricing policy, which defines valuation and pricing conventions for each security type, including practices for responding to unexpected or unusual market events. As of September 30, 20162019, our total AUM by fair value hierarchy level was 52%50% Level 1, 47%45% Level 2 and 1%5% Level 3.


52

Table of Contents

As substantially all of our AUM is valued based on observable market prices or inputs, market risk is the most significant risk underlying the valuation of our AUM. While recent economic conditions have resulted in ongoing market volatility, the fair value of substantially all of the securities held by SIPs continues to be derived from observable market inputs.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements using the statutory tax rates in effect for the year when the reported amount of the asset or liability is expected to be recovered or settled, respectively. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying values of deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. For each tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, we determine whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation. A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. We recognize the accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions in interest expense and penalties in other operating expenses.



52

Table of Contents

As a multinational corporation, we operate in various locations outside the U.S. and generate earnings fromworldwide. We repatriate earnings in excess of regulatory, capital or operational requirements for substantially all our non-U.S. subsidiaries. We indefinitely reinvest the undistributed earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries, except for income previously taxed in the U.S., subject to regulatory or legal repatriation restrictions or requirements, and the excess net earnings reduced by cash needs for operational and regulatory capital requirements, capital management plans and capital expenditure plans of our Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries. As a result, we have not recognized a provision for U.S. income taxes and a deferred income tax liability on $8.5 billion of cumulative undistributed non-U.S. earnings that are indefinitely reinvested at September 30, 2016. Changes to our policy of reinvestment or repatriation of non-U.S. earnings may have a significant effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Loss Contingencies
We are involved in various lawsuits and claims encountered in the normal course of business. When such a matter arises and periodically thereafter, we consult with our legal counsel and evaluate the merits of the claims based on the facts available at that time. In management’s opinion, an adequate accrual has been made as of September 30, 20162019 to provide for any probable losses that may arise from thesesuch matters for which we could reasonably estimate an amount. See also Note 1114 – Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.10‑K.
NEW ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
See Note 2 – New Accounting Guidance in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.10‑K.





53

Table of Contents


Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)        
Quarter ended December 31 March 31 June 30 September 30
Fiscal year 2016        
Operating revenues $1,758.0
 $1,613.9
 $1,634.3
 $1,611.8
Operating income 653.6
 537.3
 595.4
 579.4
Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. 447.8
 360.4
 446.4
 472.1
Earnings per share        
Basic $0.74
 $0.61
 $0.77
 $0.82
Diluted 0.74
 0.61
 0.77
 0.82
Dividends declared per share $0.18
 $0.18
 $0.18
 $0.18
Common stock price per share        
High $42.23
 $39.94
 $41.24
 $36.99
Low 34.62
 31.00
 30.56
 31.59
AUM (in billions)
        
Ending $763.9
 $742.6
 $732.1
 $733.3
Average 781.5
 737.1
 739.8
 736.4
         
Fiscal year 2015        
Operating revenues $2,064.3
 $2,009.8
 $2,000.8
 $1,873.8
Operating income 782.0
 757.7
 769.8
 718.1
Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. 566.4
 606.5
 504.2
 358.2
Earnings per share        
Basic $0.91
 $0.98
 $0.82
 $0.59
Diluted 0.91
 0.98
 0.82
 0.59
Dividends declared per share $0.65
1 
$0.15
 $0.15
 $0.15
Common stock price per share        
High $59.43
 $55.91
 $52.76
 $49.96
Low 49.12
 50.49
 48.69
 36.15
AUM (in billions)
        
Ending $880.1
 $880.6
 $866.5
 $770.9
Average 894.1
 881.6
 882.6
 824.5
__________
(in millions, except per share data)        
Quarter ended December 31 March 31 June 30 September 30
Fiscal year 2019        
Operating revenues $1,411.5
 $1,433.8
 $1,476.7
 $1,452.5
Operating income 411.5
 379.5
 374.9
 391.5
Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. 1
 275.9
 367.5
 245.9
 306.4
Earnings per share        
Basic $0.54
 $0.72
 $0.48
 $0.61
Diluted 0.54
 0.72
 0.48
 0.61
Dividends declared per share $0.26
 $0.26
 $0.26
 $0.26
AUM (in billions)
        
Ending $649.9
 $712.3
 $715.2
 $692.6
Average 683.2
 688.6
 710.8
 702.0
         
Fiscal year 2018        
Operating revenues $1,615.5
 $1,617.8
 $1,558.6
 $1,527.2
Operating income 581.1
 555.7
 503.1
 478.7
Net income (loss) attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. 1
 (583.3) 443.2
 402.0
 502.5
Earnings (loss) per share        
Basic $(1.06) $0.79
 $0.75
 $0.96
Diluted (1.06) 0.78
 0.75
 0.96
Dividends declared per share $0.23
 $3.23
 $0.23
 $0.23
AUM (in billions)
        
Ending $753.8
 $737.5
 $724.1
 $717.1
Average 752.7
 751.8
 731.7
 724.3
__________________
1 
IncludesNet income (loss) attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 includes an estimated income tax charge of $1.1 billion resulting from enactment of the Tax Act. Decreases to the estimate of $0.8 million, $9.7 million, $89.6 million and $0.4 million were recognized during the quarters ended March 31, 2018, June 30, 2018, September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2018. The tax charge increased by $86.4 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2019 due to the reversal of a special cash dividendtax benefit recognized in fiscal year 2018 upon issuance of $0.50 per share.final regulations by the U.S. Department of Treasury.
Risk Factors
For a description of certain risk factors and other important factors that may affect us, our subsidiaries and our business, please see the description of the risk factors set forth under Item 1A of Part I of this Form 10-K,10‑K, which is incorporated herein by reference.





54

Table of Contents


Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
In the normal course of business, our financial position is subject to market risk, including, but not limited to, potential loss due to changes in the value of financial instruments including those resulting from adverse changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and market valuation. Financial instruments include, but are not limited to, investment securities and debt obligations. Management is responsible for managing market risk. Our Enterprise Risk Management Committee is responsible for providing a framework to assist management to identify, assess and manage market and other risks.
Our market risk from assets and liabilities of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEsCIPs is limited to that of our direct equity investments in and/orthem and investment management fees earned from these entities.them. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of our consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEsCIPs are excluded from the discussion below.
AUM Market Price Risk
We are exposed to market risk through our investment management and distribution fees, which are generally calculated as a percentage of the market value of AUM. Changes in equity market prices, interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates, or a combination of these factors could cause the value of AUM to decline, which would result in lower investment management and distribution fees. Our exposure to these risks is minimized as we sponsor a broad range of investment products in various global jurisdictions, which serves to mitigate the impact of changes in any particular market or region.
Assuming the respective effective fee rates remain unchanged, a proportional 10% change in the value of our average AUM would result in corresponding 10% changes in our investment management fees and asset-based distribution fee revenues and expenses, excluding performance-based investment management fees. Such a change for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162019 would have resulted in an increase or decrease in pre-tax earnings of $406.3364.5 million.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily through our investments in SIPssponsored funds that invest in debt securities, which were $1,241.9$1,691.4 million at September 30, 20162019. Our exposure to interest rate risks from these investments in SIPs is minimized by the low average duration exposure mandate of a substantial majority of the SIPs.funds. The investment mandates of the remaining SIPsfunds consist of a broad range of products in various global jurisdictions, mitigating the impact of changes in any particular market or region. We had no exposure to changes in interest rates from debt obligations at September 30, 20162019 as all of our outstanding debt was issued at fixed rates.
As of September 30, 20162019, we have considered the potential impact of a 100 basis point movement in market interest rates on our portfolio of SIPssponsored funds that invest in debt securities. Based on our analysis, we do not expect that such a change would have a material impact on our earnings in the next twelve months.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We are subject to foreign currency exchange risk through our international operations. While the majority of our revenues are earned in the U.S., we also provide services and earn revenues in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Asia-Pacific, Canada, Asia-Pacific, The Bahamas and Latin America. Our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk is minimized in relation to our results of operations since a significant portion of these revenues is denominated in U.S. dollars. This situation may change in the future as our business continues to grow outside the U.S. and expenses incurred denominated in foreign currencies increase.
The exposure to foreign currency exchange risk in our consolidated balance sheet mostly relates to cash and cash equivalents and investments that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily in the Euro, Indian Rupee, Euro,Pound Sterling and Canadian dollar and Pound Sterling.dollar. These assets accounted for 8%11% of the total cash and cash equivalents and investments at September 30, 20162019. Changes in the values of these assets resulting from changes in U.S. dollar exchange rates are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), except for cash and cash equivalents held by subsidiaries for which the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, for which the changes are recorded in earnings. We also have exposure to foreign exchange revaluation of cash and cash equivalents and investments that are denominated in U.S. dollars and held by non-U.S. subsidiaries for which their local currency is the functional currency. These assets accounted for 5%4% of the total cash and cash equivalents and investments at September 30, 20162019. Changes in the values of these assets resulting from changes in U.S. dollar exchange rates are recorded in earnings.





55

Table of Contents


A 10% weakening of the U.S. dollar against the various foreign currencies to which we had exposure as described above would result in corresponding 10% increases in the U.S. dollar values of the foreign currency assets and 10% decreases in the foreign currency values of the U.S. dollar assets. Such a weakening as of September 30, 20162019 would result in a $78.2$67.1 million increasedecrease in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss and a $41.4$19.2 million decrease in pre-tax earnings. We generally do not use derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency exchange risk exposure. As a result, both positive and negative currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar may affect our results of operations and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Market Valuation Risk
We are exposed to market valuation risks related to securities we hold that are carried at fair value. To mitigate the risks we maintain a diversified investment portfolio and, from time to time, we may enter into derivative agreements.
The following is a summary of the effect of a 10% increase or decrease in the carrying values of our financial instruments subject to market valuation risks at September 30, 20162019. If such a 10% increase or decrease in carrying values were to occur, the changes from trading investmentequity securities measured at fair value, debt securities and direct investments in consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEsCIPs would result in a $153.6171.0 million increase or decrease in our pre-tax earnings. The changes from available-for-sale investment securities would not result in a change to other-than-temporary impairment charges that would be material to our pre-tax earnings.
(in millions) 
Carrying
Value
 
Carrying
Value
Assuming a
10% Increase
 
Carrying
Value
Assuming a
10% Decrease
Investment securities, trading $1,121.9
 $1,234.1
 $1,009.7
Investment securities, available-for-sale 301.4
 331.5
 271.3
Direct investments in consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs 413.7
 455.1
 372.3
Total $1,837.0
 $2,020.7
 $1,653.3
(in millions) Carrying Value 
Carrying Value
Assuming a 10% Increase
 
Carrying Value
Assuming a 10% Decrease
Equity securities, at fair value $530.0
 $583.0
 $477.0
Debt securities 48.2
 53.0
 43.4
Direct investments in CIPs 1,131.6
 1,244.8
 1,018.4
Total $1,709.8
 $1,880.8
 $1,538.8







56

Table of Contents



Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Index of Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017.
CONTENTS Page
 58
 59
Consolidated Financial Statements of Franklin Resources, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries:  
 6062
 6163
 6264
 6365
 6566
 6768
All schedules have been omitted as the information is provided in the financial statements or in related notes thereto or is not required to be filed, as the information is not applicable.
Certain required quarterly information is included in Item 7 of Part II of this Form 10-K10‑K report under the heading “Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)” and incorporated herein by reference.





57

Table of Contents


MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Franklin Resources, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016,2019, based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013). Based on that assessment, management concluded that, as of September 30, 2016,2019, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20162019 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audits the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as stated in their report immediately following this report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20162019.





58

Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of Franklin Resources, Inc.
In our opinion,
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Franklin Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2019, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2019 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Franklin Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) atthe Company as of September 30, 20162019 and 20152018, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 20162019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20162019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


59

Table of Contents

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Acquisition of Benefit Street Partners L.L.C. - Fair value of Indefinite-lived Investment Management Contract Intangible Assets
As described in Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, in February 2019, the Company completed its acquisition of Benefit Street Partners, L.L.C. for a purchase consideration of $720.1 million in cash, which resulted in management recording $280.1 million of indefinite-lived investment management contract intangible assets. Fair values of acquired indefinite-lived investment management contract intangible assets are based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows attributable to the contracts, which include significant assumptions about forecasts of the assets under management (“AUM”) growth rate, pre-tax profit margin, average effective fee rate, effective tax rate and discount rate.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the fair value of indefinite-lived investment management contract intangible assets from the acquisition of Benefit Street Partners L.L.C. is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management when developing the estimated fair value of indefinite-lived investment management contract intangible assets. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to management’s significant assumptions within the estimated future cash flows, including AUM growth rate and discount rate. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained from these procedures.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the fair value of indefinite-lived investment management contract intangible assets in the acquisition of Benefit Street Partners, L.L.C., including controls over development of the significant assumptions within the estimated future cash flows, specifically, AUM growth rate and discount rate. These procedures also included, among others, (i) identifying the acquired contracts by reading the purchase agreement, (ii) testing management’s process for estimating the fair value of the acquired indefinite-lived investment management contract intangible assets, (iii) testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the model and (iv) evaluating management’s significant assumptions within the estimated future cash flows, including AUM growth rate and discount rate. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the appropriateness of the Company’s discounted cash flow model and the reasonableness of the discount rate. The discount rate was evaluated by developing an independent discount rate considering the cost of capital of comparable benchmark rates and other industry factors. Evaluating the reasonableness of the AUM growth rate involved considering the past performance of the acquired business, the consistency with external market and industry data and whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.
Assessment of Investment Products for Consolidation
As described in Notes 1 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company consolidates various mutual and other investment funds, limited partnerships and similar structures (collectively, “investment products”) when the Company owns a majority of the voting interest in a voting interest entity (“VOE”) or is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). As of September 30, 2019, the assets of consolidated investment products were $2,557.1 million. As disclosed by management, the assessment of whether an investment product is a VOE or VIE involves management’s judgment and analysis on a structure-by-structure basis and considers factors such as the investment product’s legal organization and capital structure, the rights of the equity investment holders and the Company’s contractual involvement with and ownership interest in the investment product. If the investment product is determined to be a VIE, assessment of the primary beneficiary of a VIE requires management to exercise judgment to evaluate whether the Company has the power to direct the activities that


60

Table of Contents

most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the assessment of investment products for consolidation is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management in determining whether the investment product is a VOE or VIE, and if determined to be a VIE, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures relating to management’s application of consolidation accounting, and significant auditor judgment in evaluating the audit evidence obtained relating to the legal organization and capital structure, the rights of the equity investment holders and the Company’s ability to direct the activities that impact the VIE through contractual involvement with and ownership interest in the investment products.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the assessment of investment products for consolidation, including controls addressing the completeness of the Company’s investment products evaluated for consolidation, as well as controls over the judgments and factors used to reach consolidation conclusions regarding these investment products.These procedures also included, among others, testing the completeness of the investment products subject to the analysis, and, for a sample of investment products, (i) evaluating the legal and capital structures of each investment product, including the rights of the equity investment holders, (ii) evaluating management’s assessment of each investment product as a VOE or VIE and (iii) evaluating the Company’s contractual involvement with and ownership interest in each investment product and management’s determination of whether a VIE is consolidated.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Francisco, California
November 14, 201612, 2019

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1974.
 







5961

Table of Contents

FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in millions, except per share data)            
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Operating Revenues            
Investment management fees $4,471.7
 $5,327.8
 $5,565.7
 $3,985.2
 $4,367.5
 $4,359.2
Sales and distribution fees 1,806.4
 2,252.4
 2,546.4
 1,444.6
 1,599.8
 1,705.6
Shareholder servicing fees 243.6
 262.8
 281.1
 216.3
 221.9
 225.7
Other 96.3
 105.7
 98.2
 128.4
 129.9
 101.7
Total operating revenues 6,618.0
 7,948.7
 8,491.4
 5,774.5
 6,319.1
 6,392.2
Operating Expenses            
Sales, distribution and marketing 2,209.9
 2,762.3
 3,088.2
 1,819.6
 2,039.7
 2,130.9
Compensation and benefits 1,360.9
 1,453.3
 1,467.9
 1,584.7
 1,390.6
 1,333.7
Information systems and technology 207.3
 224.3
 216.3
 258.5
 243.9
 219.8
Occupancy 134.1
 132.7
 137.7
 133.6
 128.6
 121.3
General, administrative and other 340.1
 348.5
 360.1
 420.7
 397.7
 322.2
Total operating expenses 4,252.3
 4,921.1
 5,270.2
 4,217.1
 4,200.5
 4,127.9
Operating Income 2,365.7
 3,027.6
 3,221.2
 1,557.4
 2,118.6
 2,264.3
Other Income (Expenses)            
Investment and other income, net 184.0
 40.4
 235.8
 115.1
 145.3
 336.3
Interest expense (49.9) (39.6) (47.4) (24.7) (48.7) (51.5)
Other income, net 134.1
 0.8
 188.4
 90.4
 96.6
 284.8
Income before taxes 2,499.8
 3,028.4
 3,409.6
 1,647.8
 2,215.2
 2,549.1
Taxes on income 742.1
 923.7
 997.9
 442.3
 1,472.5
 759.4
Net income 1,757.7
 2,104.7
 2,411.7
 1,205.5
 742.7
 1,789.7
Less: net income (loss) attributable to            
Redeemable noncontrolling interests 6.2
 (12.8) 53.0
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests 29.4
 75.5
 6.8
 3.6
 (8.9) 40.0
Redeemable noncontrolling interests 1.6
 (6.1) 20.6
Net Income Attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. $1,726.7
 $2,035.3
 $2,384.3
 $1,195.7
 $764.4
 $1,696.7
            
Earnings per Share            
Basic $2.94
 $3.29
 $3.79
 $2.35
 $1.39
 $3.01
Diluted 2.94
 3.29
 3.79
 2.35
 1.39
 3.01
Dividends Declared per Share $0.72
 $1.10
 $0.48





See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



62


Table of Contents




FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Net Income $1,205.5
 $742.7
 $1,789.7
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)      
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax (52.5) (91.9) 65.4
Net unrealized gains (losses) on defined benefit plans, net of tax (2.0) 1.9
 2.1
Net unrealized gains on investments, net of tax 1.5
 4.3
 2.2
Total other comprehensive income (loss) (53.0) (85.7) 69.7
Total comprehensive income 1,152.5
 657.0
 1,859.4
Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to      
Redeemable noncontrolling interests 6.2
 (12.8) 53.0
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests 3.6
 (8.9) 40.0
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. $1,142.7
 $678.7
 $1,766.4





See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

63

Table of Contents

FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share and per share data)    
as of September 30, 2019 2018
Assets    
Cash and cash equivalents $5,803.4
 $6,610.8
Receivables 740.0
 733.7
Investments (including $589.7 and $551.6 at fair value at September 30, 2019 and 2018) 1,555.8
 1,426.5
Assets of consolidated investment products    
Cash and cash equivalents 154.2
 299.8
Receivables 99.0
 114.2
Investments, at fair value 2,303.9
 2,109.4
Property and equipment, net 683.7
 535.0
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net 2,994.5
 2,333.4
Other 197.7
 220.7
Total Assets $14,532.2
 $14,383.5
     
Liabilities    
Compensation and benefits $502.4
 $405.6
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 222.9
 158.9
Dividends 137.4
 127.7
Commissions 254.0
 297.9
Income taxes 824.7
 1,034.8
Debt 696.9
 695.9
Liabilities of consolidated investment products    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 81.5
 68.0
Debt 50.8
 32.6
Deferred taxes 120.1
 126.5
Other 270.6
 184.1
Total liabilities 3,161.3
 3,132.0
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) 

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests 746.7
 1,043.6
Stockholders’ Equity    
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued 
 
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 499,303,269 and 519,122,574 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2019 and 2018 49.9
 51.9
Retained earnings 10,288.2
 10,217.9
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (431.6) (370.6)
Total Franklin Resources, Inc. stockholders’ equity 9,906.5
 9,899.2
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests 717.7
 308.7
Total stockholders’ equity 10,624.2
 10,207.9
Total Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Stockholders’ Equity $14,532.2
 $14,383.5


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

64

Table of Contents

FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
  Franklin Resources, Inc. 
Non-
redeemable
Non-
controlling
Interests
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 Common Stock 
Capital
in Excess
of Par
Value
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accum-
ulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
Loss
 
Stockholders’
Equity
(in millions)
as of and for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Shares Amount
Balance at October 1, 2016 570.3
 $57.0
 $
 $12,226.2
 $(347.4) $11,935.8
 $592.4
 $12,528.2
Adoption of new accounting guidance       5.8
 (7.1) (1.3) (324.6) (325.9)
Net income  
  
  
 1,696.7
  
 1,696.7
 40.0
 1,736.7
Other comprehensive income  
  
  
  
 69.7
 69.7
  
 69.7
Dividends declared on common stock ($0.80 per share)       (449.9)  
 (449.9)  
 (449.9)
Repurchase of common stock (19.1) (1.9) (140.1) (629.5)  
 (771.5)  
 (771.5)
Issuance of common stock 3.7
 0.4
 134.2
  
  
 134.6
  
 134.6
Tax shortfall from stock-based compensation  
  
 (8.7)  
  
 (8.7)  
 (8.7)
Stock-based compensation  
  
 14.6
  
  
 14.6
  
 14.6
Net subscriptions and other  
  
  
  
  
  
 17.3
 17.3
Deconsolidation of investment product             (9.3) (9.3)
Balance at September 30, 2017 554.9
 $55.5
 $
 $12,849.3
 $(284.8) $12,620.0
 $315.8
 $12,935.8
Adoption of new accounting guidance     2.1
 (1.6) (0.1) 0.4
   0.4
Net income (loss)       764.4
   764.4
 (8.9) 755.5
Other comprehensive loss         (85.7) (85.7)   (85.7)
Dividends declared on common stock ($3.92 per share)       (2,131.3)   (2,131.3)   (2,131.3)
Repurchase of common stock (39.9) (4.0) (170.4) (1,252.3)   (1,426.7)   (1,426.7)
Issuance of common stock 3.3
 0.3
 130.8
     131.1
   131.1
Stock-based compensation     10.6
     10.6
   10.6
Acquisition 0.8
 0.1
 26.9
     27.0
   27.0
Net distributions and other             (6.0) (6.0)
Net consolidation of investment products             2.4
 2.4
Purchase of noncontrolling interest       (10.6)   (10.6) 5.4
 (5.2)
Balance at September 30, 2018 519.1
 $51.9
 $
 $10,217.9
 $(370.6) $9,899.2
 $308.7
 $10,207.9
Adoption of new accounting guidance       22.9
 (8.0) 14.9
   14.9
Net income       1,195.7
   1,195.7
 3.6
 1,199.3
Other comprehensive loss         (53.0) (53.0)   (53.0)
Dividends declared on common stock ($1.04 per share)       (528.3)   (528.3)   (528.3)
Repurchase of common stock (24.6) (2.5) (133.8) (620.0)   (756.3)   (756.3)
Issuance of common stock 4.8
 0.5
 129.8
     130.3
   130.3
Stock-based compensation     4.0
     4.0
   4.0
Net subscriptions and other             165.0
 165.0
Consolidation of investment product             24.3
 24.3
Acquisition             216.1
 216.1
Balance at September 30, 2019 499.3
 $49.9
 $
 $10,288.2
 $(431.6) $9,906.5
 $717.7
 $10,624.2

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

65

Table of Contents

FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Net Income $1,205.5
 $742.7
 $1,789.7
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Amortization of deferred sales commissions 85.8
 80.7
 72.0
Depreciation and other amortization 93.4
 76.4
 80.3
Stock-based compensation 111.5
 117.8
 123.4
Losses (income) from investments in equity method investees 10.4
 (44.4) (107.9)
Net losses (gains) on investments of consolidated investment products 26.3
 55.0
 (118.2)
Net (purchase) liquidation of investments by consolidated investment products (1,497.6) 365.7
 (812.2)
Deferred income taxes (1.3) (50.6) 8.8
Other 25.1
 33.7
 (14.9)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Increase in receivables and other assets (34.2) (90.1) (96.7)
Decrease (increase) in receivables of consolidated investment products (34.3) 68.5
 (64.3)
Decrease (increase) in investments, net 142.5
 (39.2) 130.2
Increase (decrease) in accrued compensation and benefits 89.4
 (19.1) 37.2
Increase (decrease) in commissions payable (43.9) (15.4) 11.3
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable (210.1) 965.2
 44.5
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities 126.0
 (23.0) (9.2)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of consolidated investment products 107.1
 5.8
 61.4
Net cash provided by operating activities 201.6
 2,229.7
 1,135.4
Purchase of investments (393.9) (358.2) (372.5)
Liquidation of investments 343.2
 286.2
 344.9
Purchase of investments by consolidated investment products 
 (73.8) (114.7)
Liquidation of investments by consolidated investment products 
 73.3
 368.1
Additions of property and equipment, net (233.7) (106.5) (74.9)
Adoption of new accounting guidance 
 
 (49.2)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (684.2) (86.8) (14.0)
Net deconsolidation of investment products (108.5) (24.6) (35.7)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (1,077.1) (290.4) 52.0
Issuance of common stock 23.3
 24.8
 24.9
Dividends paid on common stock (518.6) (2,116.9) (441.2)
Repurchase of common stock (754.5) (1,424.8) (765.3)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation 
 
 0.9
Payments on debt 
 (361.9) (300.0)
Proceeds from loan 1.7
 
 
Payments on loan (1.5) 
 (53.7)

[Table continued on next page]

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.




6066


FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Net Income $1,757.7
 $2,104.7
 $2,411.7
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)      
Net unrealized losses on investments, net of tax (12.5) (11.7) (40.9)
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax (18.3) (184.2) (80.4)
Net unrealized losses on defined benefit plans, net of tax (2.4) (0.6) (2.5)
Total other comprehensive loss (33.2) (196.5) (123.8)
Total comprehensive income 1,724.5
 1,908.2
 2,287.9
Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to      
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests 29.4
 75.5
 6.8
Redeemable noncontrolling interests 1.6
 (6.1) 20.6
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. $1,693.5
 $1,838.8
 $2,260.5
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
[Table continued from previous page]
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Proceeds from debt of consolidated investment products $19.9
 $
 $20.6
Payments on debt by consolidated investment products (2.0) (21.0) (308.5)
Payments on contingent consideration liability (20.4) (21.6) (35.3)
Noncontrolling interests 1,211.6
 159.7
 901.6
Net cash used in financing activities (40.5) (3,761.7) (956.0)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (37.0) (16.7) 35.0
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (953.0) (1,839.1) 266.4
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 6,910.6
 8,749.7
 8,483.3
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year $5,957.6
 $6,910.6
 $8,749.7
       
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information      
Cash paid for income taxes $520.8
 $523.5
 $712.2
Cash paid for interest 27.4
 38.6
 42.3
Cash paid for interest by consolidated investment products 2.3
 2.6
 11.2







































See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.




6167


FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share and per share data)    
as of September 30, 2016 2015
Assets    
Cash and cash equivalents $8,247.1
 $8,184.9
Receivables 794.3
 838.0
Investments (including $1,437.6 and $1,712.3 at fair value at September 30, 2016 and 2015) 2,416.6
 2,459.2
Assets of consolidated sponsored investment products    
Cash and cash equivalents 89.8
 108.5
Investments, at fair value 1,025.6
 977.4
Assets of consolidated variable interest entities    
Cash and cash equivalents 146.4
 74.7
Investments, at fair value 487.8
 672.5
Property and equipment, net 523.2
 510.1
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net 2,211.3
 2,257.0
Other 156.7
 253.4
Total Assets $16,098.8
 $16,335.7
Liabilities    
Compensation and benefits $357.4
 $433.2
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 233.3
 232.1
Dividends 104.6
 92.6
Commissions 302.0
 359.9
Debt 1,401.2
 1,348.0
Debt of consolidated sponsored investment products 75.0
 81.2
Debt of consolidated variable interest entities 607.2
 726.1
Deferred taxes 161.5
 241.4
Other 267.3
 265.8
Total liabilities 3,509.5
 3,780.3
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11) 
 
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests 61.1
 59.6
Stockholders’ Equity    
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued 
 
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 570,345,156 and 603,517,181 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and 2015 57.0
 60.4
Retained earnings 12,226.2
 12,094.8
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (347.4) (314.2)
Total Franklin Resources, Inc. stockholders’ equity 11,935.8
 11,841.0
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests 592.4
 654.8
Total stockholders’ equity 12,528.2
 12,495.8
Total Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Stockholders’ Equity $16,098.8
 $16,335.7



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



62


FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
  Franklin Resources, Inc. 
Nonredeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
(in millions)Common Stock 
Capital
in Excess
of Par
Value
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Appropriated
Retained
Earnings of
Consolidated
Variable
Interest Entities
 
Accumulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
Income (Loss)
 
Stockholders’
Equity
as of and for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014
Shares Amount
Balance at October 1, 2013 630.9
 $63.1
 $
 $9,991.2
 $12.7
 $6.1
 $10,073.1
 $612.4
 $10,685.5
Net income  
  
  
 2,384.3
    
 2,384.3
 6.8
 2,391.1
Net income reclassified to appropriated retained earnings         1.2
   1.2
 (1.2)  
Other comprehensive loss  
  
  
  
   (123.8) (123.8)  
 (123.8)
Cash dividends declared on common stock       (301.7)    
 (301.7)  
 (301.7)
Repurchase of common stock (11.5) (1.1) (172.9) (448.2)    
 (622.2)  
 (622.2)
Issuance of common stock 3.5
 0.3
 148.9
  
    
 149.2
  
 149.2
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation  
  
 13.3
  
    
 13.3
  
 13.3
Stock-based compensation  
  
 10.7
  
    
 10.7
  
 10.7
Net subscriptions  
  
  
  
    
  
 10.3
 10.3
Balance at September 30, 2014 622.9
 $62.3
 $
 $11,625.6
 $13.9
 $(117.7) $11,584.1
 $628.3
 $12,212.4
Adjustment for adoption of new accounting guidance       (0.3) (13.9)   (14.2)   (14.2)
Net income       2,035.3
     2,035.3
 75.5
 2,110.8
Other comprehensive loss           (196.5) (196.5)   (196.5)
Cash dividends declared on common stock       (682.1)     (682.1)   (682.1)
Repurchase of common stock (22.5) (2.2) (173.9) (883.7)     (1,059.8)   (1,059.8)
Issuance of common stock 3.1
 0.3
 154.5
       154.8
   154.8
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation     10.9
       10.9
   10.9
Stock-based compensation     8.5
       8.5
   8.5
Net distributions               (49.0) (49.0)
Balance at September 30, 2015 603.5
 $60.4
 $
 $12,094.8
 $
 $(314.2) $11,841.0
 $654.8
 $12,495.8
[Table continued on next page]



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



63


FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
[Table continued from previous page]
  Franklin Resources, Inc. 
Nonredeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
(in millions) Common Stock 
Capital
in Excess
of Par
Value
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Appropriated
Retained
Earnings of
Consolidated
Variable
Interest Entities
 
Accumulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
Income (Loss)
 
Stockholders’
Equity
as of and for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014
 Shares Amount
Balance at September 30, 2015 603.5
 $60.4
 $
 $12,094.8
 $
 $(314.2) $11,841.0
 $654.8
 $12,495.8
Net income       1,726.7
     1,726.7
 29.4
 1,756.1
Other comprehensive loss           (33.2) (33.2)   (33.2)
Cash dividends declared on common stock       (420.7)     (420.7)   (420.7)
Repurchase of common stock (36.6) (3.7) (146.0) (1,174.6)     (1,324.3)   (1,324.3)
Issuance of common stock 3.4
 0.3
 149.8
       150.1
   150.1
Tax shortfall from stock-based compensation     (5.9)       (5.9)   (5.9)
Stock-based compensation     2.1
       2.1
   2.1
Net distributions               (91.8) (91.8)
Balance at September 30, 2016 570.3
 $57.0
 $
 $12,226.2
 $
 $(347.4) $11,935.8
 $592.4
 $12,528.2



















See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



64


FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Net Income $1,757.7
 $2,104.7
 $2,411.7
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Amortization of deferred sales commissions 75.2
 112.8
 127.8
Depreciation and other amortization 87.1
 97.4
 94.6
Impairment of intangible assets 28.2
 8.2
 
Stock-based compensation 131.5
 140.0
 127.7
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation (0.8) (11.0) (12.2)
Gains on sale of assets (29.7) (31.6) (59.7)
Losses (income) from investments in equity method investees (56.7) 63.2
 (68.1)
Net losses (gains) on other investments of consolidated sponsored investment products 19.7
 (28.9) (16.9)
Net gains of consolidated variable interest entities (5.4) (6.0) (6.1)
Other 20.5
 9.1
 6.1
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Decrease (increase) in receivables, prepaid expenses and other (10.8) 45.2
 (113.7)
Decrease (increase) in trading securities, net 120.4
 23.3
 (80.2)
Increase in trading securities of consolidated sponsored investment products, net (242.3) (181.1) (482.9)
Originations of loans held for sale 
 
 (38.3)
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for resale 
 
 38.4
Increase (decrease) in accrued compensation and benefits (76.7) (16.7) 24.3
Increase (decrease) in commissions payable (57.9) (80.4) 2.6
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable (14.0) 20.0
 15.8
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities (18.3) (16.2) 167.1
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,727.7
 2,252.0
 2,138.0
Purchase of investments (367.8) (297.2) (303.2)
Liquidation of investments 405.2
 405.5
 583.9
Purchase of investments by consolidated sponsored investment products (78.5) (164.1) (324.2)
Liquidation of investments by consolidated sponsored investment products 125.4
 241.6
 181.0
Purchase of investments by consolidated variable interest entities (254.8) (274.8) (259.4)
Liquidation of investments by consolidated variable interest entities 471.9
 402.3
 488.9
Decrease in loans receivable, net 
 
 38.0
Decrease in loans transferred to held for sale 
 
 8.2
Proceeds from sale of loans transferred to held for sale 
 
 181.3
Additions of property and equipment, net (97.6) (68.8) (53.1)
Net (deconsolidation) consolidation of sponsored investment products (11.6) 4.4
 (150.8)
Net cash provided by investing activities 192.2
 248.9
 390.6
[Table continued on next page]


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



65


FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
[Table continued from previous page]
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Decrease in deposits $
 $(0.3) $(587.5)
Issuance of common stock 24.1
 25.5
 32.6
Dividends paid on common stock (408.7) (666.4) (290.4)
Repurchase of common stock (1,308.0) (1,059.8) (622.2)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation 0.8
 11.0
 12.2
Proceeds from loan 93.4
 
 
Payment on loan (41.2) 
 
Proceeds from issuance of debt 
 395.7
 
Payments on debt 
 (250.0) 
Proceeds from debt of consolidated sponsored investment products 33.8
 571.8
 793.6
Payments on debt by consolidated sponsored investment products (40.1) (611.2) (779.3)
Payments on debt by consolidated variable interest entities (139.7) (121.0) (194.3)
Payments on contingent consideration liabilities (3.2) (7.9) (6.3)
Noncontrolling interests (11.9) 100.4
 446.3
Net cash used in financing activities (1,800.7) (1,612.2) (1,195.3)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (4.0) (116.6) (60.4)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents 115.2
 772.1
 1,272.9
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 8,368.1
 7,596.0
 6,323.1
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year $8,483.3
 $8,368.1
 $7,596.0
       
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information      
Cash paid for income taxes $758.6
 $925.0
 $979.3
Cash paid for interest 47.4
 44.6
 40.2
Cash paid for interest by consolidated variable interest entities and consolidated sponsored investment products 28.3
 33.0
 43.6

















See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



66




NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies
Business. Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin”) is a holding company that, together with its various subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is referred to, operates as Franklin Templeton Investments.Templeton. The Company provides investment management and related services toin jurisdictions worldwide for investors globally throughin investment products thatwhich include investmentsponsored funds, as well as institutional and institutional, high net-worth and separately-managed accounts (collectively, the “sponsored investment products” or “SIPs”).high-net-worth separate accounts. In addition to investment management, the Companys services include fund administration, sales and distribution, marketing,and shareholder servicing, and trust, custody and other fiduciary services.servicing.
Basis of Presentation. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Management believes that the accounting estimates are appropriate and the resulting balances are reasonable; however, due to the inherent uncertainties in making estimates, actual amounts may differ from these estimates. Certain comparative amounts for prior fiscal years have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation as of and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162019 (“fiscal year 20162019”).
Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Franklin and its subsidiaries and SIPsconsolidated investment products (“CIPs”) in which it has a controlling financial interest. The Company has a controlling financial interest when it owns a majority of the voting interest in ana voting interest entity (“VOE”) or when it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company also consolidates non-VIE limited partnerships and similar structures that it controls. All material intercompanyIntercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
A VIE is an entity in which the equity investment holders have not contributed sufficient capital to finance its activities or the equity investment holders do not have defined rights and obligations normally associated with an equity investment. TheSubstantially all of the Companys VIEs are all investment entities,products, and its variable interests consist of its equity ownership interestinterests in and/orand investment management fees earned from these entities.products.
The Company uses two models for determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of VIEs. For all VIEs with the exception of collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), the Company is the primary beneficiary if it has the majority of the risks or rewards of ownership, which it determines using expected cash flow scenarios. For CLOs, the Company is the primary beneficiarya VIE if it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of or right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Under both models,Investment management fees earned from VIEs are excluded from the primary beneficiary determination if they are deemed to be at market and commensurate with service. The key estimates and assumptions used in the analyses include the amount of assets under management (“AUM”), investment management fee rates, and the life of the investment product, prepayment rates, and the discount rate.product.
The Company is presumed to control non-VIE limited partnerships and similar structures for which it is the general partner or managing member unless the limited partners or other investors have the substantive ability to remove the Company as general partner or managing member or otherwise participate in the decision-making of the entity. The Companys risk of loss in these entities is limited to its investments in the entities as the general partner and managing member entities are structured as limited liability companies.
Related Parties include the investmentsponsored funds sponsored by the Company as a result of the Companys advisory relationship and equity method investees. TheA substantial amount of the Companys operating revenues and receivables are primarily from related parties.
Earnings per Share. Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed using the two-class method, which considers participating securities as a separate class of shares. The Companys participating securities consist of its nonvested stock and stock unit awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to the Companys common shareholders,stockholders, adjusted to exclude earnings allocated to participating securities, by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period.

Business combinations are accounted for by recognizing the acquired assets, including separately identifiable intangible assets, and assumed liabilities at their acquisition-date estimated fair values. Any excess of the purchase consideration over the acquisition-date fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recognized as goodwill. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed due to new information about facts that existed as of the acquisition date, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded in earnings.
Intangible assets acquired in business combinations consist of investment management contracts. The fair values of the acquired assets are based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows attributable to the contracts, which include significant assumptions about forecasts of the AUM growth rate, pre-tax profit margin, average effective fee rate, effective tax rate and discount rate. The intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from three to 15 years, using the straight-line method, unless the asset is determined to have an indefinite useful life. Indefinite-lived intangible assets represent contracts to manage investment assets for which there is no foreseeable limit on the contract period.




6768



Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually as of August 1 and when an event occurs or circumstances change that more likely than not reduce the fair value of the related reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset below its carrying value. The Company has one reporting unit, investment management and related services, consistent with its single operating segment, to which all goodwill has been assigned. Amortization and impairment are recognized in general, administrative and other expense.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets may first be assessed for qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. The qualitative analysis considers entity-specific and macroeconomic factors and their potential impact on the key assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset. A quantitative impairment test is performed if the results of the qualitative assessment indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, or if a qualitative assessment is not performed.
If a quantitative goodwill impairment test indicates that the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, impairment is recognized in the amount of the excess of the carrying value over the implied fair value of the goodwill, which considers the fair value assigned to all other assets and liabilities of the reporting unit.
If a quantitative indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test indicates that the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value, impairment is recognized in the amount of the difference in values.
The fair values of the reporting unit and indefinite-lived intangible assets are based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows, which include assumptions about the AUM growth rate, pre-tax profit margin, average effective fee rate, effective tax rate and discount rate.
Definite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment quarterly. Impairment is indicated when the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. Recoverability is evaluated based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows using assumptions about the AUM growth rate, pre-tax profit margin, average effective fee rate and expected useful lives. If the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable through undiscounted cash flows, impairment is recognized in the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the asset’s fair value, as determined by discounted cash flows or other methods as appropriate for the asset type.
Fair Value Measurements. The Company uses a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. The three levels of fair value hierarchy are set forth below. The Companys assessment of the hierarchy level of the assets or liabilities measured at fair value is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of each quarter.
Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.liabilities, which may include published net asset values (“NAV”) for fund products.
  
Level 2
Observable inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices, such as non-binding quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or corroborated by observable market data. Level 2 quoted prices are generally obtained from two independent third-party brokers or dealers, including prices derived from model-based valuation techniques for which the significant assumptions are observable in the market or corroborated by observable market data. Quoted prices are validated through price variance analysis, subsequent sales testing, stale price review, price comparison across pricing vendors and due diligence reviews of third-party vendors.
  
Level 3Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. These inputs require significant management judgment and reflect the Company'sCompany’s estimation of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Quoted market prices may be adjusted if events occur, such as significant price changes in proxies traded in relevant markets after the close of corresponding markets, trade halts or suspensions, or unscheduled market closures. These proxies consist of correlated country-specific exchange-traded securities, such as futures, American Depositary Receipts indices or exchange-traded funds. The fair values for Level 3 assets and liabilitiesprice adjustments are primarily determined using various methodologies in accordance with the Companys global valuation and pricing policy which defines valuation and pricing conventions for each security type. When available, fair value is measured based on third-party factors derived from model-based valuation techniques for which the reported net asset value (“NAV”)significant assumptions are observable in the market.


69

The Company records a
A substantial amount of itsthe Company’s investments is recorded at fair value or amounts that approximate fair value on a recurring basis. The financial assets and financial liabilities of consolidated CLOs are measured using the more observableInvestments in fund products for which fair value of eitheris estimated using NAV as a practical expedient (when the financial assets or financial liabilities.NAV is available to the Company as an investor but is not publicly available) are not classified in the fair value hierarchy. Fair values are estimated for disclosure purposes for financial instruments that are not measured at fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents primarily consist of debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less at the purchase date, nonconsolidated SIPsponsored money market funds time deposits with maturities of three months or less, and deposits with financial institutions. Cashinstitutions and cash equivalents are carried at cost, except for debt instruments which are carried at amortized cost. Due to the short-term nature and liquidity of these financial instruments, thetheir carrying values of these assets approximate fair value and, for disclosure purposes, they are classified as Level 1.value.
The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions in various countries, limits the amount of credit exposure with any given financial institution and conducts ongoing evaluations of the creditworthiness of the financial institutions with which it does business.
Receivables consist primarily of fees receivable from SIPsinvestment products and are carried at invoiced amounts. Due to the short-term nature and liquidity of the receivables, thetheir carrying values of these assets approximate fair value.
Investments consist of investmentequity securities trading and available-for-sale,measured at fair value, debt securities, investments in equity method investees and other investments. At September 30, 2018, prior to the adoption of new accounting guidance, investments in equity securities with a readily determinable fair value were classified as either trading or available-for-sale and investments in fund products without a published NAV were carried at cost.



68


InvestmentEquity Securities, Tradingat fair value consist primarily of nonconsolidated SIPssponsored funds and to a lesser extent, debtother equity investment securities. Changes in the fair value of the investments are recognized as gains and losses in earnings. The fair values of funds are determined based on their published NAV or estimated using NAV as a practical expedient. The fair values of equity securities other equitythan funds are determined using independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes or based on discounted cash flows using significant unobservable inputs.
Debt Securities consist of trading and available-for-sale securities and are carried at fair value. Changes in the fair value of trading securities are recognized as gains and losses in earnings. The fair value of the SIPs is determined based on their published NAV and they are classified as Level 1. The fair values of certain debt and the other equity securities are determined using quoted market prices, if available, or independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes, which are evaluated for reasonableness, and they are classified as Level 2. The fair value of other debt securities is determined using discounted cash flow techniques and they are classified as Level 3.
Investment Securities, Available-for-Sale consist primarily of nonconsolidated SIPs and to a lesser extent, debt and other equity securities, and are carried at fair value. RealizedUnrealized gains and losses are included in investment income using the average cost method. Unrealized gains and losseson available-for-sale securities are recorded net of tax as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized.realized, at which time they are recognized in earnings using the average cost method. The fair valuevalues of the SIPs is determined based on their published NAV and they are classified as Level 1. The fair value of the debt securities is primarilyare determined using independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes, and they are classified as Level 2. The fair value of other equity securities is determinedor based on discounted cash flows using quoted market prices and they are classified as Level 1.significant unobservable inputs.
Investments in Equity Method Investees consist of equity investments in entities, including SIPs,sponsored funds, over which the Company is able to exercise significant influence, but not control. Significant influence is generally considered to exist when the Companys ownership interest in the voting stock of the investee is between 20% and 50%, although other factors, such as representation on the investees board of directors and the impact of commercial arrangements, also are considered in determining whether the equity method of accounting is appropriate. Investments in limited partnerships and limited liability companies for which the Company is not deemed to have control are accounted for using the equity method when the Companys investment is more than minor or when the Company is the general partner. Under the equity method of accounting, the investments are initially carried at cost and subsequently adjusted by the Companys proportionate share of the entities net income, which is recognized in earnings.
Other Investments consist of time deposits with maturities greater than three months from the date of purchase, equity investments in entities over which the Company is unable to exercise significant influence and aredo not marketable,have a readily determinable fair value, time deposits with maturities greater than three months from the date of purchase, and life settlement contracts. The equity investments are measured at cost adjusted for observable price changes and impairment, if any, which are recognized in earnings. The fair value of the entities is generally estimated using significant unobservable inputs in either a market-based or income-based approach. The time deposits are carried at cost. Duecost, which approximates fair value due to thetheir short-term nature and liquidity of these financial instruments, the carrying values of the time deposits approximate fair value, and they are classified as Level 2. The equity investments are accounted for under the cost method. For disclosure purposes, the fair value of these investments is generally estimated based on their NAV and they are classified as Level 3.liquidity. Life settlement contracts are carried at fair value, which is determined based on discounted cash flows using significant unobservable inputs, and are classified as Level 3.inputs.
Impairment of Investments. Investments otherin available-for-sale securities, equity method investees and equity investments that do not have a readily determinable fair value are evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis. The evaluation of equity investments considers qualitative factors, including the financial condition and specific events related to an investee, that may indicate the fair value of the investment is less than tradingits carrying value. Impairment of equity securities is recognized in earnings.


70


Available-for-sale debt securities are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis when the cost of an investment exceeds its fair value. For equity securities, the Company considers many factors, including the severity and duration of the decline in the fair value below cost, the Companys intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery in fair value, and the financial condition and specific events related to the issuer. When an impairment of an equity security is determined to be other-than-temporary, the impairment is recognized in earnings. For debt securities, ifIf the Company intends to sell or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost, the entire impairment is recognized in earnings. If the Company does not intend to sell or it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before anticipated recovery of its amortized cost, the impairment is separated into the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss, and the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The credit loss componentwhich is the difference between the security's amortized cost and the present value of theits expected cash flows, and is recognized in earnings. Losses related to all other factors areearnings with the remaining loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Cash and Cash Equivalents of Consolidated SIPsCIPs consist of deposits with financial institutions and highly liquid investments, including money market funds, which are readily convertible into cash, and deposits with financial institutions, and are carried at cost. Due to the short-term nature and liquidity of these financial instruments, their carrying values approximate fair valuevalue.
Receivablesof CIPs consist of investment and for disclosure purposes, theyshare transaction related receivables and are classified as Level 1.carried at transacted amounts. Due to the short-term nature and liquidity of the receivables, their carrying values approximate fair value.
Investments of Consolidated SIPsCIPs consist of tradingmarketable debt and equity securities and other investments that are not generally traded in active markets, and are carried at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the investments are recognized as gains and losses in earnings. The fair valuevalues of the tradingmarketable securities isare determined using quoted market prices, or independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes if quoted market prices are not available. These securities are classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The quoted market prices may be adjusted if events occur, such as significant price changes in U.S.-traded market proxies after the close of corresponding foreign markets, trade halts or suspensions, or unscheduled market closures. The market proxies



69


consist of correlated country-specific exchange-traded securities, such as futures, American Depositary Receipts indices or exchange-traded funds. The price adjustments are primarily determined based on third-party factors derived from model-based valuation techniques for which the significant assumptions are observable in the market.
The investments that are not generally traded in active markets consist of debtequity and equitydebt securities of entities in emerging markets, fund products, other equity and fund products.debt instruments, real estate and loans. The fair values of the debt and equity securities are determined using significant unobservable inputs in either a market-based or income-based approach, and they are classified as Level 3. The fair value of theexcept for fund products, is determinedfor which fair values are estimated using NAV as a practical expedient. These investments are classified as Level 2 if they are redeemable without restriction on at least a quarterly basis, or Level 3 if they have a redemption frequency greater than quarterly, are subject to redemption restrictions, or are nonredeemable.
Cash and Cash Equivalentsof Consolidated VIEs consist of investments in a money market fund and are carried at fair value. The fair value of the fund is based on its published NAV and it is classified as Level 1.
Investments of Consolidated VIEs consist substantially of corporate debt securities and are carried at fair value. The fair value is primarily obtained from independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes and they are classified as Level 2.
Property and Equipment, net are recorded at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which range from three to 35 years. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives or the lease term, whichever is shorter.
Internal and external costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining software for internal use are capitalized and amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the software which range from three to five years,or the license terms, beginning when the software project is complete and the application is put into production.
Property and equipment isare tested for impairment when there is an indication that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Carrying values are not recoverable when the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the assets are less than their carrying values. When an asset is determined to not be recoverable, the impairment is measured based on the excess, if any, of the carrying value of the asset over its respective fair value. Fair value is determined by discounted future cash flows models, appraisals or other applicable methods.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net. Goodwill represents the excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets consist of investment management contracts resulting from business acquisitions. These intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from six to 15 years, using the straight-line method, unless the asset is determined to have an indefinite useful life. Indefinite-lived intangible assets represent contracts to manage investment assets for which there is no foreseeable limit on the contract period.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually as of August 1 and when an event occurs or circumstances change that more likely than not reduce the fair value of the related reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset below its carrying value. The Company has one reporting unit, investment management and related services, consistent with its single operating segment, to which all goodwill has been assigned.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets may first be assessed for qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. The qualitative analysis considers entity-specific and macroeconomic factors and their potential impact on the key assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset. A quantitative impairment test is performed if the results of the qualitative assessment indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, or if a qualitative assessment is not performed.
The quantitative goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value is less than the fair value, no impairment exists and the second step is not performed. If the carrying value is higher than the fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step is performed to compute the amount of any impairment. In the second step, impairment is computed by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying value of the goodwill.
The quantitative indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test compares the fair value of the asset to its carrying value. If the carrying value is higher than the fair value, impairment is recognized in the amount of the difference in values.



70


In estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company uses valuation techniques based on an income approach under which future cash flows are discounted. The future cash flow estimates include assumptions about revenue and AUM growth rates, the pre-tax profit margin, the average effective fee rate, the effective tax rate, and the discount rate, which is based on the Companys weighted average cost of capital.
Definite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment quarterly. Impairment is indicated when the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. In evaluating the recoverability of definite-lived intangible assets, the Company estimates the undiscounted future cash flows to be derived from these assets. The future undiscounted cash flow projections include assumptions about revenue and AUM growth rates, effective fee rates, investor redemptions, the pre-tax profit margin, and expected useful lives. If the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable through the related undiscounted cash flows, the impairment is measured based on the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value and recognized in general, administrative and other expense. The fair value of the asset is determined by discounted cash flows or other methods as appropriate for the asset type.
Deferred Sales Commissions consist of up-frontupfront commissions paid to financial advisers and broker-dealers on shares of sponsored funds sold without a front-end sales charge, to investors, and are amortized over the periods in which they are generally recovered from related revenues, which range from one18 months to sevensix years. Deferred sales commissions are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.
Contingent Consideration LiabilityDebt consists of the expected future payments related to the Company’s commitment to acquire the remaining interests in K2 Advisors Holdings, LLC (“K2”) and is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. The liability is carried at fair value, determined using an income-based method which considers the net present value of anticipated future cash flows based on estimated future revenue and profits and timing of payments, and is classified as Level 3.
Debt consistsalmost entirely of senior notes and a loan, andwhich are carried at amortized cost. For disclosure purposes, theThe fair values arevalue is estimated using quoted market prices, independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes, or prices of publicly traded debt with similar maturities, credit risk and interest rates. The notes and loan are classified as Level 2.
Debt of Consolidated SIPs CIPs is carried at amortized cost. For disclosure purposes, theThe fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow model that considers current interest rate levels, the quality of the underlying collateral and current economic conditions.
Contingent Consideration Liability consisted of the expected future payments related to the Company’s commitment to acquire the remaining interests in K2 Advisors Holdings, LLC and was included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2018. The debt is classified as Level 3.
Debt of Consolidated VIEs consists of debt of CLOs and is measured based on theliability, which was settled during fiscal year 2019, was carried at fair value, ofdetermined using the assets of the consolidated CLOs less the fairnet present value of the Company’s own economic interests in the CLOs.anticipated future cash flows.


71


Noncontrolling Interests relate almost entirely to consolidated SIPs.CIPs. Noncontrolling intereststhat are currently redeemable or convertible for cash or other assets at the option of the holder are classified as temporary equity. Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests are classified as a component of equity. Net income (loss) attributable to third-party investors is reflected as net income (loss) attributable to nonredeemable and redeemable noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statements of income. Sales and redemptions of shares of consolidated SIPsCIPs by third-party investors are a component of the change in noncontrolling interests included in financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Revenues. The Company earns revenue primarily from providing investment management and related services to its customers, which are generally investment products or investors in separate accounts. Related services include fund administration, sales and distribution, and shareholder servicing. Revenues are recognized when the Company’s obligations related to the services are satisfied and it is probable that a significant reversal of the revenue amount would not occur in future periods. The obligations are satisfied over time as the services are rendered, except for the sales and distribution obligations for the sale of shares of sponsored funds which are satisfied on trade date. Multiple services included in customer contracts are accounted for separately when the obligations are determined to be distinct.
Fees from providing investment management and fund administration services (“investment management fees”), distribution fees and shareholder servicing fees are recognized as earned, over the period in which services are rendered, except forother than performance-based investment management fees, which are recognized when earned. Sales commissions related to the sale of shares of SIPs are recognized on trade date. Investment management fees, other than performance-based fees, and distribution fees, are determined based on a percentage of AUM, primarily on a monthly basis using daily average daily AUM.AUM, and are recognized as the services are performed over time. Performance-based investment management fees are based ongenerated when investment products’ performance exceeds targets established in customer contracts. These fees are recognized when the relatedamount is no longer probable of significant reversal and may relate to investment management contracts. services that were provided in prior periods.
Sales and distribution fees primarily consist of upfront sales commissions and ongoing distribution fees. Sales commissions are based on contractual rates for sales of certain classes of sponsored funds and are recognized on trade date. Distribution service fees are determined based on a percentage of AUM, primarily on a monthly basis using daily average AUM. As the fee amounts are uncertain on trade date, they are recognized over time as the amounts become known and may relate to sales and distribution services provided in prior periods.
Shareholder servicing fees are generally calculatedprimarily determined based on a percentage of AUM on a monthly basis using daily average AUM and either the number and type of transactions in shareholder accounts serviced.or the number of shareholder accounts, while fees from certain investment products are based only on AUM. The fees are recognized as the services are performed over time.
AUM is generally based on the fair value of the underlying securities held by SIPsinvestment products and is calculated using fair value methods derived primarily from unadjusted quoted market prices, unadjusted independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes in active markets, or market prices or price quotes adjusted for observable price movements after the close of the primary market.market in accordance with the Company’s global valuation and pricing policy. The fair values of the underlying securities for which market prices are not readily available are valued internally valued using various methodologies which incorporate significant unobservable inputs as appropriate for each security type and represent an insignificant percentage of total AUM. Pricing of the securities held by SIPs
Revenue is governed by the Companys



71


global valuation and pricing policy, which defines valuation and pricing conventions for each security type, including practices for responding to unexpected or unusual market events.
Sales commissions and distribution fees are recorded gross of sales and distribution expenses paidpayments made to financial advisers and other intermediaries asthird-party service providers in the Company acts as the principal in itsCompany’s role as primary obligorprincipal as it controls the delegated services provided to the sales and distribution agreements.customers.
Stock-Based Compensation. The fair value of share-basedstock-based payment awards is estimated on the date of grant based on the market price of the underlying shares of the Companys common stock and is amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the related vesting period, which is generally three years. Expense relating to awards subject to performance conditions is recognized if it is probable that the performance goalsconditions will be achieved. The probability of achievement is assessed on a quarterly basis. The total number of awards expected to vest is adjustedForfeitures are accounted for estimated forfeitures.as they occur.
Postretirement Benefits. Defined contribution plan costs are expensed as incurred.
Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements using the statutory tax rates in effect for the year when the reported amount of the asset or liability is expected to be recovered or settled, respectively. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying values of deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. For each tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, the Company determines whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the


72


position, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation. A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. The Company recognizes the accrual of interestInterest on uncertain tax positionsmatters is recognized in interest expense and penalties in other operating expenses.
As a multinational corporation, the Company operates in various locations outside the United StatesU.S. and generates earnings fromworldwide. The Company repatriates the earnings in excess of regulatory, capital or operational requirements of substantially all of its non-U.S. subsidiaries. ThePrior to January 1, 2018, the Company indefinitely reinvestsreinvested the undistributed earnings of all its non-U.S. subsidiaries, except for income previously taxed in the U.S., or subject to regulatory or legal repatriation restrictions or requirements, and the excess net earnings reduced by cash needs for operational and regulatory capital requirements, capital management plans and capital expenditure plans of its Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries.requirements.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions. Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate in a local currency environment, where thatfor which the local currency is the functional currency are translated at current exchange rates as of the end of the accounting period. The related revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the period. Net exchange gains and losses resulting from translation are excluded from income and are recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Transactions denominated in a foreign currency are revalued at the current exchange rate at the transaction date and any related gains and losses are recognized in earnings.
Note 2 – New Accounting Guidance
TheRecently Adopted Accounting Guidance
On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted new guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendment to the existing consolidation guidance in February 2015. The amendment modifies the consolidation framework for certain investment entities and all limited partnerships. It also eliminates certain criteria used to determine whether fees paid to a decision maker are a variable interest. The Company will adopt the amended guidance on October 1, 2016 and recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. The adoption is expected to result in the consolidation of SIPs that will change from voting interest entities to VIEs and become subject to a lower threshold for consolidation. In addition, certain CLOs for which the Company will no longer be the primary beneficiary and several limited partnerships are expected to be deconsolidated upon adoption of the amendment.
The FASB issued an amendment to the existing stock-based compensation guidance in March 2016. The amendment requires all income tax effects of stock-based awards to be recognized as income tax expense when the awards vest or settle, provides an election to account for forfeitures as they occur and clarifies the classification of these transactions within the statement of cash flows. The amendment is effective for the Company on October 1, 2017 and requires varying transition approaches for the different changes to the guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the amendment.



72


The FASB issued new guidance in May 2014 that requires use of a single principles-based model for recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of the model is that revenue is recognized upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the expected consideration to be received for the goods or services. The guidance also changes the accounting for certain contract costs and revises the criteria for determining if an entity is effective foracting as a principal or agent in certain arrangements. The Company adopted the Companynew guidance using the modified retrospective approach which did not require the restatement of prior periods, and recognized a cumulative effect adjustment resulting in decreases in total assets, total liabilities and retained earnings of $9.1 million, $2.2 million and $6.9 million.
The adoption of the guidance had no impact on operating income or net income. Individual line items in the consolidated statements of income were impacted as follows:
(in millions) 
As
Reported
 
Adoption
Impact
 
Amount
Without
Adoption
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019   
Operating Revenues      
Investment management fees $3,985.2
 $59.6
 $4,044.8
Sales and distribution fees 1,444.6
 (59.6) 1,385.0
Shareholder servicing fees 216.3
 (8.6) 207.7
       
Operating Expenses      
General, administrative and other $420.7
 $(8.6) $412.1

On October 1, 2018, and allows for either a full retrospective or modified approach at adoption. Thethe Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the guidance.
The FASB issuedadopted an amendment to the existing financial instruments guidance in January 2016. The amendmentissued by the FASB that requires substantially all equity investments in nonconsolidated entities to be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income,earnings, except for those accounted for using the equity method of accounting.accounting, which impacted all equity securities previously classified as available-for-sale and investments in fund products for which fair value was estimated using NAV as a practical expedient. The amendment also provides an election to measure equity investments that do not have a readily determinable fair value at cost lessadjusted for observable price changes and impairment, if any. The amendment is effective forany, which the Company on October 1, 2018made. The Company adopted the amendment using the modified retrospective approach and requiresrecognized a cumulative effect adjustment toresulting in increases in investments, retained earnings at adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impactand accumulated other comprehensive loss of adopting the amendment.$21.8 million, $29.8 million and $8.0 million.


73


Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted
The FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for leases in February 2016. The new guidance requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities arising from substantially all leases. The guidance also requires an evaluation at the inception of a contract to determine whether the contract is effective foror contains a lease. The Company will adopt the Companyguidance on October 1, 2019 and requires ausing the modified retrospective approach at adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impactand expects to recognize a right-of-use asset of adopting the guidance.approximately $270 million and a lease liability of approximately $315 million, substantially all of which relate to real estate leases.
The FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for credit losses in June 2016. The new guidance requires the application of a current expected credit loss model for financial assets measured at amortized cost, including receivables, and an allowance for credit loss model for available-for-sale debt securities. The guidance is effective for the Company on October 1, 2020 and requires a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings at adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the guidance.
Note 3 Acquisition
On February 1, 2019, the Company acquired all of the outstanding ownership interests in Benefit Street Partners L.L.C., a U.S. alternative credit manager, for a purchase consideration of $720.1 million in cash, of which $135.0 million was used to retire debt. The acquisition provides the Company private credit capabilities that complement its alternative and fixed income strategies available to clients.
The initial and revised estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities and noncontrolling interests assumed were as follows:
(in millions) 
Initial
Estimated
Fair Value
 Adjustments 
Revised
Estimated
Fair Value
as of February 1, 2019   
Cash $33.2
 $
 $33.2
Investments 138.8
 
 138.8
Investments of consolidated investment products 84.9
 
 84.9
Indefinite-lived intangible assets 307.5
 (27.4) 280.1
Definite-lived intangible assets 75.8
 
 75.8
Goodwill 315.8
 29.9
 345.7
Other assets 35.7
 (0.5) 35.2
Other liabilities (58.2) 0.7
 (57.5)
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests (216.1) 
 (216.1)
Total Identifiable Net Assets $717.4
 $2.7
 $720.1

The adjustments to the initial estimated fair values are a result of new information obtained about facts that existed as of the acquisition date. The fair values of the intangible assets, which relate to management contracts, and goodwill were retrospectively adjusted as of February 1, 2019. The estimated useful life of certain of the intangible assets was also retrospectively adjusted. The goodwill is primarily attributable to expected growth from the private credit asset class. The amount of goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes is $453.2 million, which includes deferred payments that are recognized as compensation expense for accounting purposes.
Costs incurred in connection with the acquisition were $6.8 million in fiscal year 2019.
The Company has not presented pro forma combined results of operations for this acquisition because the results of operations as reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of income would not have been materially different.


74


Note 3 4 Earnings per Share
The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
(in millions, except per share data)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. $1,195.7
 $764.4
 $1,696.7
Less: allocation of earnings to participating nonvested stock and stock unit awards 10.9
 17.6
 12.4
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $1,184.8
 $746.8
 $1,684.3
       
Weighted-average shares outstanding – basic 503.6
 537.4
 558.8
Dilutive effect of nonparticipating nonvested stock unit awards 0.7
 0.6
 0.3
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding – Diluted 504.3
 538.0
 559.1
       
Earnings per Share      
Basic $2.35
 $1.39
 $3.01
Diluted 2.35
 1.39
 3.01

(in millions, except per share data)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Net income attributable to Franklin Resources, Inc. $1,726.7
 $2,035.3
 $2,384.3
Less: allocation of earnings to participating nonvested stock and stock unit awards 10.9
 12.0
 14.3
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $1,715.8
 $2,023.3
 $2,370.0
       
Weighted-average shares outstanding – basic 583.8
 614.8
 624.8
Dilutive effect of nonparticipating nonvested stock unit awards and common stock options 
 0.1
 0.4
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding – Diluted 583.8
 614.9
 625.2
       
Earnings per Share      
Basic $2.94
 $3.29
 $3.79
Diluted 2.94
 3.29
 3.79
Nonparticipating nonvested stock unit awards excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive were 1.30.2 million for fiscal year 20162019, 0.90.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20152018 (“fiscal year 2015”2018”), and 0.10.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20142017 (“fiscal year 2014”2017”).

Note 5 Revenues
Operating revenues by geographic area were as follows:


  Earned From Contracts With Customers 
Not Earned From
Contracts With Customers 1
 Total
(in millions)United States Luxembourg 
Americas
Excluding United States
 Asia-Pacific 
Europe, Middle East and Africa,
Excluding Luxembourg
for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2019
Investment management fees $2,260.6
 $1,064.7
 $325.4
 $241.8
 $92.7
 $
 $3,985.2
Sales and distribution fees 941.3
 437.2
 63.3
 1.3
 1.5
 
 1,444.6
Shareholder servicing fees 175.7
 30.1
 0.1
 10.4
 
 
 216.3
Other 18.6
 1.5
 
 1.0
 2.2
 105.1
 128.4
Total $3,396.2
 $1,533.5
 $388.8
 $254.5
 $96.4
 $105.1
 $5,774.5
73__________________
1
Consists of interest and dividend income from consolidated investment products.
Operating revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the locations of the subsidiaries that provide the services, which may differ from the regions in which the related investment products are sold.


75



Note 46 – Investments
The disclosures below include details of the Company’s investments, excluding those of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs.CIPs. See Note 911Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products for information related to the investments held by these entities.
The Company adopted new accounting guidance on October 1, 2018 that requires substantially all equity investments in nonconsolidated entities to be measured at fair value with changes recognized in earnings, except for those accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The new guidance did not change the accounting for investments in non-equity securities. Investment balances and related changes for the prior year have not been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation as of and for the year ended September 30, 2019.
Investments consisted of the following:
(in millions)    
as of September 30, 2016 2015
Investment securities, trading    
SIPs $844.4
 $1,166.0
Debt and other equity securities 277.5
 85.2
Total investment securities, trading 1,121.9
 1,251.2
Investment securities, available-for-sale    
SIPs 297.7
 408.3
Debt and other equity securities 3.7
 38.1
Total investment securities, available-for-sale 301.4
 446.4
Investments in equity method investees 797.4
 655.3
Other investments 195.9
 106.3
Total $2,416.6
 $2,459.2
(in millions)  
as of September 30, 2019
Equity securities, at fair value  
Sponsored funds $466.4
Other equity securities 63.6
Total equity securities, at fair value 530.0
Debt securities  
Trading 44.2
Available-for-sale 4.0
Total debt securities 48.2
Investments in equity method investees 933.4
Other investments 44.2
Total $1,555.8
Debt and other equity trading securities consist primarily of corporate debt.
(in millions)  
as of September 30, 2018
Investment securities, trading  
Sponsored funds $248.1
Debt and other equity securities 97.6
Total investment securities, trading 345.7
Investment securities, available-for-sale  
Sponsored funds 178.6
Debt and other equity securities 15.5
Total investment securities, available-for-sale 194.1
Investments in equity method investees 780.8
Other investments 105.9
Total $1,426.5

At September 30, 2016 and 2015, investmentInvestment securities with aggregate carrying amounts of $117.31.2 million and $4.3 million were pledged as collateral.collateral at both September 30, 2019 and 2018.


76


Gross unrealized gains and losses relating to investment securities, available-for-sale were as follows:
   Gross Unrealized  
(in millions)   Gross Unrealized  Cost Basis Gains Losses Fair Value
as of September 30, 2016Cost Basis Gains Losses Fair Value
SIPs $289.6
 $13.7
 $(5.6) $297.7
as of September 30, 2019        
Debt securities $4.0
 $
 $
 $4.0
        
as of September 30, 2018        
Sponsored funds $172.9
 $8.3
 $(2.6) $178.6
Debt and other equity securities 3.6
 0.1
 
 3.7
 16.8
 0.5
 (1.8) 15.5
Total $293.2
 $13.8
 $(5.6) $301.4
 $189.7
 $8.8
 $(4.4) $194.1
(in millions)   Gross Unrealized  
as of September 30, 2015Cost Basis Gains Losses Fair Value
SIPs $382.6
 $32.4
 $(6.7) $408.3
Debt and other equity securities 37.9
 0.4
 (0.2) 38.1
Total $420.5
 $32.8
 $(6.9) $446.4
 
GrossThere were no gross unrealized losses relating to investment securities, available-for-sale at September 30, 2019. Such losses at September 30, 2018 aggregated by length of time that individual securities have beenwere in a continuous unrealized loss position were as follows:
  Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
(in millions)Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses
as of September 30, 2018     
Sponsored funds $48.8
 $(2.1) $21.0
 $(0.5) $69.8
 $(2.6)
Debt and other equity securities 10.9
 (1.8) 
 
 10.9
 (1.8)
Total $59.7
 $(3.9) $21.0
 $(0.5) $80.7
 $(4.4)

  Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
(in millions)Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses
as of September 30, 2016     
SIPs $75.8
 $(4.3) $18.0
 $(1.3) $93.8
 $(5.6)



74

Table of Contents

  Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
(in millions)Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses
as of September 30, 2015     
SIPs $99.8
 $(5.6) $21.0
 $(1.1) $120.8
 $(6.7)
Debt and other equity securities 10.9
 (0.2) 
 
 10.9
 (0.2)
Total $110.7
 $(5.8) $21.0
 $(1.1) $131.7
 $(6.9)
The Company recognized $11.1other-than-temporary impairment of $10.5 million $10.0in earnings during fiscal year 2019, and $1.7 million and $0.6$0.8 million of other-than-temporary impairment during fiscal years 2016, 20152018 and 2014, of which $5.8 million, $8.2 million and $0.4 million related to available-for-sale SIPs.2017.
Note 57 – Fair Value Measurements
The disclosures below include details of the Company’s fair value measurements, excluding those of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs.CIPs. See Note 911Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products for information related to fair value measurements of the assets and liabilities of these entities.
AssetsThe assets and liabilitiesliability measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
as of September 30, 2016    
Assets        
Investment securities, trading        
SIPs $844.4
 $
 $
 $844.4
Debt and other equity securities 2.6
 84.1
 190.8
 277.5
Investment securities, available-for-sale        
SIPs 297.7
 
 
 297.7
Debt and other equity securities 1.6
 2.1
 
 3.7
Life settlement contracts 
 
 14.3
 14.3
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $1,146.3
 $86.2
 $205.1
 $1,437.6
Liabilities        
Contingent consideration liability $
 $
 $98.1
 $98.1
(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 NAV as a
Practical
Expedient
 Total
as of September 30, 2019     
Assets          
Equity securities, at fair value          
Sponsored funds $397.0
 $
 $
 $69.4
 $466.4
Other equity securities 22.6
 3.2
 0.8
 37.0
 63.6
Debt securities          
Trading 
 24.4
 19.8
 
 44.2
Available-for-sale 
 4.0
 
 
 4.0
Life settlement contracts 
 
 11.5
 
 11.5
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $419.6
 $31.6
 $32.1
 $106.4
 $589.7




77

Table of Contents
(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
as of September 30, 2015    
Assets        
Investment securities, trading        
SIPs $1,166.0
 $
 $
 $1,166.0
Debt and other equity securities 2.2
 77.0
 6.0
 85.2
Investment securities, available-for-sale        
SIPs 408.3
 
 
 408.3
Debt and other equity securities 12.2
 25.9
 
 38.1
Life settlement contracts 
 
 14.7
 14.7
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $1,588.7
 $102.9
 $20.7
 $1,712.3
Liabilities        
Contingent consideration liabilities $
 $
 $102.9
 $102.9

(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
as of September 30, 2018    
Assets        
Investment securities, trading        
Sponsored funds $248.1
 $
 $
 $248.1
Debt and other equity securities 26.6
 50.5
 20.5
 97.6
Investment securities, available-for-sale        
Sponsored funds 178.6
 
 
 178.6
Debt and other equity securities 4.4
 10.8
 0.3
 15.5
Life settlement contracts 
 
 11.8
 11.8
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $457.7
 $61.3
 $32.6
 $551.6
         
Liability        
Contingent consideration liability $
 $
 $38.7
 $38.7

Investments for which fair value was estimated using reported NAV as a practical expedient primarily consist of nonredeemable private debt, equity, infrastructure and real estate funds. These investments are expected to be returned through distributions over the life of the funds as a result of liquidations of the funds’ underlying assets. The expected weighted-average life for $46.9 million of the investments was 1.3 years at September 30, 2019. The liquidation period for a $48.6 million investment in a private debt fund is unknown. The Company’s unfunded commitments to the funds totaled $4.7 million at September 30, 2019.
Changes in the Level 3 assets and liability were as follows:

 2019 2018
(in millions) Investments 
Contingent
Consideration
Liability
 Investments 
Contingent
Consideration
Liability
for the fiscal years ended September 30,  
Balance at beginning of year $32.6
 $(38.7) $199.9
 $(51.0)
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)        
Included in investment and other income, net 7.0
 
 4.5
 
Included in general, administrative and other expense 
 (2.0) 
 (13.1)
Purchases 10.7
 
 14.5
 
Sales (6.5) 
 (2.6) 
Settlements (4.6) 40.7
 (174.0) 32.4
Transfers out of Level 3 (7.1) 
 
 
Foreign exchange revaluation and other 
 
 (9.7) (7.0)
Balance at End of Year $32.1
 $
 $32.6
 $(38.7)
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income relating to assets and liability held at end of year $3.4
 $
 $2.1
 $(13.1)

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, or into or out of Level 3 during fiscal years 20162019 and 2015.2018.





7578

Table of Contents

Changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

 2016 2015
(in millions) Investments Contingent Consideration Liabilities Investments Contingent Consideration Liabilities
for the fiscal years ended September 30,  
Balance at beginning of year $20.7
 $(102.9) $14.0
 $(98.5)
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)        
Included in investment and other income, net (2.4) 
 1.6
 
Included in general, administrative and other expense 
 1.0
 
 (12.4)
Other 
 
 
 (0.1)
Purchases 190.4
 
 6.6
 
Sales (4.0) 
 
 
Settlements (2.8) 3.8
 (1.5) 7.9
Foreign exchange revaluation 3.2
 
 
 0.2
Balance at End of Year $205.1
 $(98.1) $20.7
 $(102.9)
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income relating to assets and liabilities held at end of year $(4.0) $1.0
 $0.8
 $(12.5)

Valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurringthe Level 3 fair value measurements were as follows:
(in millions)        
as of September 30, 2019 Fair Value Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs 
Range (Weighted Average 1)
Debt securities, trading $19.8
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 2.7%–13.3% (6.7%)
Risk premium 2.0%–6.1% (4.2%)
         
Life settlement contracts 11.5
 Discounted cash flow Life expectancy 19–107 months (57)
Discount rate 8.0%–20.0% (13.2%)
__________________
1
Based on the relative fair value of the instruments.
(in millions)        
as of September 30, 2018 Fair Value Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs Range (Weighted Average)
Investment securities, trading - debt and other equity securities $20.5
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 4.1%–12.3% (5.8%)
 Risk premium 2.0%–6.7% (3.6%)
         
Life settlement contracts 11.8
 Discounted cash flow Life expectancy 20–115 months (61)
Discount rate 8.0%–20.0% (13.1%)
         
Contingent consideration liability 38.7
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 13.0%

(in millions)        
as of September 30, 2016 Fair Value Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs Range (Weighted Average)
Investment securities, trading - debt and other equity securities $190.8
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 3.6%–6.9% (6.7%)
   Risk premium 2.0%–17.9% (16.5%)
   Liquidity discount 0.0%–10.0% (9.6%)
         
Life settlement contracts 14.3
 Discounted cash flow Life expectancy 20–132 months (65)
Discount rate 3.3%–18.0% (11.5%)
         
Contingent consideration liability 98.1
 Discounted cash flow AUM growth rate 2.4%–11.5% (5.9%)
EBITDA margin 14.3%
Discount rate 13.2%
(in millions)        
as of September 30, 2015 Fair Value Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs Range (Weighted Average)
Investment securities, trading - debt and other equity securities $6.0
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 5.2%–6.1% (5.7%)
   Risk premium 2.7%–2.8% (2.8%)
         
Life settlement contracts 14.7
 Discounted cash flow Life expectancy 21–141 months (68)
Discount rate 3.3%–19.0% (11.7%)
         
Contingent consideration liabilities 102.9
 Discounted cash flow AUM growth rate 0.5%–5.8% (4.4%)
EBITDA margin 19.3%–22.9% (22.0%)
Discount rate 14.0%
For investment securities, trading - debt and other equity securities, aIf the relevant significant increase (decrease)inputs used in the discount rate, risk premium or liquidity discount in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher)discounted cash flow valuations were independently higher (lower) as of September 30, 2019, the resulting fair value measurement.
For life settlement contracts, a significant increase (decrease) inof the life expectancy or the discount rate in isolationassets would result in a significantlybe lower (higher) fair value measurement.



76

Table of Contents

For the contingent consideration liability, a significant increase (decrease) in the AUM growth rate or EBITDA margin, or decrease (increase) in the discount rate, in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement..
Financial instruments that were not measured at fair value were as follows:
    2019 2018
(in millions) 
Fair
Value
Level
 
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated
Fair Value
as of September 30,     
Financial Assets          
Cash and cash equivalents 1 $5,803.4
 $5,803.4
 $6,610.8
 $6,610.8
Other investments          
Time deposits 2 15.4
 15.4
 12.3
 12.3
Equity securities 3 17.3
 19.2
 81.8
 103.6
           
Financial Liability          
Debt 2 $696.9
 $718.7
 $695.9
 $671.1



79
(in millions)   2016 2015
as of September 30, Fair Value Level Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value
Financial Assets          
Cash and cash equivalents 1 $8,247.1
 $8,247.1
 $8,184.9
 $8,184.9
Other investments          
Time deposits 2 131.6
 131.6
 37.0
 37.0
Cost method investments 3 50.0
 61.3
 54.6
 60.1
Financial Liabilities          
Debt 
        
Senior notes 2 1,348.5
 1,412.5
 1,348.0
 1,374.9
Loan 2 52.7
 52.7
 
 


Table of Contents

Note 68 – Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:
(in millions)     
Useful Lives
In Years
as of September 30, 2019 2018 
Furniture, software and equipment $846.7
 $798.6
 3 – 10
Premises and leasehold improvements 789.2
 628.1
 5 – 35
Land 80.1
 74.1
 N/A
Total cost 1,716.0
 1,500.8
  
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (1,032.3) (965.8)  
Property and Equipment, Net $683.7
 $535.0
  

(in millions)     
Useful Lives
In Years
as of September 30, 2016 2015 
Furniture, software and equipment $756.4
 $733.6
 3 – 10
Premises and leasehold improvements 563.5
 557.0
 5 – 35
Land 74.1
 74.2
 N/A
Total cost 1,394.0
 1,364.8
  
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (870.8) (854.7)  
Property and Equipment, Net $523.2
 $510.1
  
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $81.0$83.2 million, $81.6$78.9 million and $82.6$81.5 million in fiscal years 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017. The Company recognized insignificant impairments$6.6 million of equipment during fiscal years 2016 and 2015, and no impairment during fiscal year 2014.2018, and insignificant impairment amounts during fiscal years 2019 and 2017.



77

Table of Contents

Note 79 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net consisted of the following:
(in millions)    
as of September 30, 2019 2018
Goodwill $2,130.3
 $1,794.8
Indefinite-lived intangible assets 799.4
 530.7
Definite-lived intangible assets, net 64.8
 7.9
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net $2,994.5
 $2,333.4

(in millions)    
as of September 30, 2016 2015
Goodwill $1,661.2
 $1,661.2
Indefinite-lived intangible assets 530.9
 538.3
Definite-lived intangible assets, net 19.2
 57.5
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net $2,211.3
 $2,257.0
Changes in the carrying value of goodwill were as follows:
Indefinite-lived
(in millions)    
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018
Balance at beginning of year $1,794.8
 $1,687.2
Acquisitions 345.7
 117.4
Foreign exchange revaluation and other (10.2) (9.8)
Balance at End of Year $2,130.3
 $1,794.8

During fiscal year 2019, the Company recognized $9.3 million of impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets consistrelated to Canadian management contracts due to revised estimates of management contracts.future pre-tax profit margins and AUM growth rates for the associated fund products. No impairment of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets was recognized during fiscal years 2016, 20152018 and 2014. The2017, or of goodwill carrying value changed during fiscal year 2015 due to foreign exchange revaluation.years 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Definite-lived intangible assets were as follows:
  2019 2018
(in millions) 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Value
 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Value
as of September 30,      
Management contracts $125.4
 $(60.6) $64.8
 $54.9
 $(47.0) $7.9

The Company recognized impairment of definite-lived intangible assets of $4.0 million, $5.7 million and $9.6 million during fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 primarily due to investor redemptions.


80

Table of Contents
  2016 2015
(in millions) Gross Carrying Value Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Value Gross Carrying Value Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Value
as of September 30,      
Management contracts $60.1
 $(40.9) $19.2
 $89.5
 $(36.2) $53.3
Customer base 
 
 
 164.5
 (160.3) 4.2
Total $60.1
 $(40.9) $19.2
 $254.0
 $(196.5) $57.5

Amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible assets was $10.4$14.7 million,, $20.1 $1.8 million and $20.8$3.9 million for fiscal years 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017.
The Company recognized impairment of management contract definite-lived intangible assets, primarily related to the K2 Advisors Holdings, LLC acquisition, of $28.2 million and $8.2 million during fiscal years 2016 and 2015 due to increased investor redemptions and lower estimates of future sales. The impairment in fiscal year 2016 was also due to renegotiations of certain investment management fees. No impairment of definite-lived intangible assets was recognized during fiscal year 2014.
Definite-lived intangible assets had a weighted-average remaining useful life of 7.63.7 years at September 30, 20162019, with estimated remaining amortization expense as follows:
(in millions)  
for the fiscal years ending September 30, Amount
2020 $18.9
2021 18.1
2022 16.6
2023 7.4
2024 2.8
Thereafter 1.0
Total $64.8

(in millions)  
for the fiscal years ending September 30, Amount
2017 $4.4
2018 4.4
2019 1.6
2020 1.4
2021 1.2
Thereafter 6.2
Total $19.2



78

Table of Contents

Note 810 – Debt
The disclosures below include details of the Company’s debt, excluding that of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs.CIPs. See Note 911Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products for information related to the debt of these entities.
Debt consisted of the following:
(in millions) 2019 
Effective
Interest Rate
 2018 
Effective
Interest Rate
as of September 30,
Senior Notes        
$300 million 2.80% notes due September 2022 $299.8
 2.93% $299.7
 2.93%
$400 million 2.85% notes due March 2025 399.6
 2.97% 399.6
 2.97%
Total senior notes 699.4
   699.3
  
Other        
Loan due December 2019 0.2
 9.30% 
 N/A
Debt issuance costs (2.7)   (3.4)  
Total $696.9
   $695.9
  

(in millions) 2016 
Effective
Interest Rate
 2015 
Effective
Interest Rate
as of September 30,
Senior Notes        
$300 million 1.375% notes due September 2017 $299.7
 1.66% $299.4
 1.66%
$350 million 4.625% notes due May 2020 349.9
 4.74% 349.8
 4.74%
$300 million 2.800% notes due September 2022 299.5
 2.93% 299.5
 2.93%
$400 million 2.850% notes due March 2025 399.4
 2.97% 399.3
 2.97%
Total senior notes 1,348.5
   1,348.0
  
Other        
Loan due March 2017 52.7
 9.89% 
 N/A
Total $1,401.2
   $1,348.0
  
At September 30, 20162019, the Company’s outstanding senior unsecured unsubordinated notes had an aggregate face value of $1.4 billion700.0 million. The notes have fixed interest rates with interest payable semi-annually and contain an optional redemption feature that allows the Company to redeem each series of notes prior to maturity in whole or in part at any time, at a make-whole redemption price. The indentures governing the notes contain limitations on the Company’s ability and the ability of its subsidiaries to pledge voting stock or profit participating equity interests in its subsidiaries to secure other debt without similarly securing the notes equally and ratably. The indentures also include requirements that must be met if the Company consolidates or merges with, or sells all or substantially all of its assets to, another entity.
In March 2016, the Company borrowed 6.3 billion Indian Rupees ($93.4 million) at a fixed interest rate of 9.89% to purchase certain securities from SIPs domiciled in India. Interest on the loan is payable monthly, and the loan may be prepaid without penalty. To secure the loan, the Company concurrently entered into a standby letter of credit for 6.5 billion Indian Rupees ($96.6 million) collateralized by a $116.0 million time deposit. The loan agreement requires that the borrowing entity, a subsidiary of the Company located in India, maintain a specified minimum level of capital. In September 2016, the Company prepaid 2.8 billion Indian Rupees ($41.2 million) of the loan.
The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants at September 30, 2016.2019.
At September 30, 2016, maturities for debt were as follows:
(in millions) Carrying Amount
for the fiscal years ending September 30,
2017 $352.4
2018 
2019 
2020 349.9
2021 
Thereafter 698.9
Total $1,401.2
At September 30, 2016,2019, the Company had $500.0$500.0 million of short-term commercial paper available for issuance under an uncommitted private placement program which has been inactive since 2012.





7981

Table of Contents


Note 9 11 Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products
CIPs consist of mutual and other investment funds, limited partnerships and similar structures, substantially all of which are sponsored by the Company, and include both VOEs and VIEs. The Company had 60 and 53 CIPs as of September 30, 2019 and 2018.
The balances related to CIPs included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
(in millions)    
as of September 30, 2019 2018
Assets    
Cash and cash equivalents $154.2
 $299.8
Receivables 99.0
 114.2
Investments, at fair value 2,303.9
 2,109.4
Other assets 
 1.0
Total Assets $2,557.1
 $2,524.4
     
Liabilities    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $81.5
 $68.0
Debt 50.8
 32.6
Other liabilities 
 9.3
Total liabilities 132.3
 109.9
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests 746.7
 1,043.6
Stockholders Equity
    
Franklin Resources, Inc.’s interests 1,129.6
 1,092.6
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests 548.5
 278.3
Total stockholders’ equity 1,678.1
 1,370.9
Total Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Stockholders Equity
 $2,557.1
 $2,524.4

The CIPs did not have a significant impact on net income attributable to the Company sponsorsin fiscal years 2019, 2018 and manages various types of investment products, which consist of both VIEs and non-VIEs. The Company consolidates the VIE products for which it is the primary beneficiary and the non-VIE products which it controls. 2017.
The Company has no right to the consolidated products’CIPs’ assets, other than its direct equity investmentinvestments in them and/orand investment management and other fees earned from them. The debt holders of these consolidated entitiesthe CIPs have no recourse to the Company’s assets beyond the level of its direct investment, therefore the Company bears no other risks associated with the entities’CIPs’ liabilities.
The balances of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
  2016 2015
(in millions) Consolidated   Consolidated  
as of September 30, SIPs VIEs Total SIPs VIEs Total
Assets            
Cash and cash equivalents $89.8
 $146.4
 $236.2
 $108.5
 $74.7
 $183.2
Receivables 24.3
 23.6
 47.9
 10.0
 11.5
 21.5
Investments, at fair value 1,025.6
 487.8
 1,513.4
 977.4
 672.5
 1,649.9
Other assets 1.4
 
 1.4
 0.7
 
 0.7
Total Assets $1,141.1
 $657.8
 $1,798.9
 $1,096.6
 $758.7
 $1,855.3
Liabilities            
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $19.5
 $45.7
 $65.2
 $10.8
 $25.3
 $36.1
Debt 75.0
 607.2
 682.2
 81.2
 726.1
 807.3
Other liabilities 8.5
 
 8.5
 6.3
 
 6.3
Total liabilities 103.0
 652.9
 755.9
 98.3
 751.4
 849.7
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests 61.1
 
 61.1
 59.6
 
 59.6
Stockholders Equity
            
Franklin Resources Inc.’s interests 409.2
 4.9
 414.1
 308.8
 7.3
 316.1
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests 567.8
 
 567.8
 629.9
 
 629.9
Total stockholders’ equity 977.0
 4.9
 981.9
 938.7
 7.3
 946.0
Total Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Stockholders Equity
 $1,141.1
 $657.8
 $1,798.9
 $1,096.6
 $758.7
 $1,855.3
The consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs did not have a significant impact on net income attributable to the Company in fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Consolidated SIPs
Consolidated SIPs consist of limited partnerships and similar structures that the Company controls and other fundInvestment products in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. The Company consolidated 37 SIPs as of September 30, 2016, and 32 SIPs as of September 30, 2015. SIPs are typically consolidated when the Company makes an initial investment in a newly launched fund or limited partnership entity, andinvestment entity. They are typically deconsolidated when the Company redeemsno longer has a controlling financial interest due to redemptions of its investment or increases in the SIP or its voting interests decrease to a minority percentage.third-party investments. The Company’s investments in SIPsthese products subsequent to deconsolidation are accounted for as trading or available-for-sale investment securities,either equity method investments or equity method or cost method investmentssecurities at fair value depending on the naturestructure of the SIPproduct and the Company’s role and level of ownership.





8082

Table of Contents

Consolidated VIEs
Consolidated VIEs consist of sponsored CLOs, which are asset-backed financing entities collateralized by a pool of corporate debt securities. The Company generally earns senior and subordinated management fees from the CLOs based on the par value of outstanding investments and, in certain instances, may also receive performance-based fees. In addition, the Company holds a residual interest in one of these entities. The debt holders of the CLOs have recourse only to the corresponding collateralized assets, which cannot be used by the Company for any other purpose. Scheduled debt payments are based on the performance of the CLOs collateral pool and may be prepaid prior to the contractual maturity dates. The Company is the primary beneficiary of the CLOs as it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the CLOs’ economic performance in its role as collateral manager and has the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the CLOs.
During fiscal years 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized $6.2 million and $8.3 million of net gains related to its own economic interests in the CLOs.
The unpaid principal balance and fair value of the investments of the CLOs were as follows:
(in millions) 
  
as of September 30, 2016 2015
Unpaid principal balance $496.0
 $694.5
Difference between unpaid principal balance and fair value (8.2) (22.0)
Fair Value $487.8
 $672.5
There were no investments 90 days or more past due at September 30, 2016 or 2015.
The unpaid principal balance of the debt of the CLOs was $653.8 million and $769.3 million at September 30, 2016 and 2015.
Investments
Investments of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs consisted of the following:
  2016 2015
(in millions) Consolidated   Consolidated  
as of September 30, SIPs VIEs Total SIPs VIEs Total
Investment securities, trading $287.8
 $
 $287.8
 $180.5
 $
 $180.5
Other debt securities 131.0
 487.3
 618.3
 129.2
 672.5
 801.7
Other equity securities 606.8
 0.5
 607.3
 667.7
 
 667.7
Total $1,025.6
 $487.8
 $1,513.4
 $977.4
 $672.5
 $1,649.9
Investment securities, trading held by consolidated SIPs consist of equity and debt securities that are traded in active markets. Other equity and debt securities held by consolidated SIPs primarily consist of direct investments in equity securities and secured and unsecured debt securities of entities in emerging markets, which are generally not traded in active markets. Other equity securities also include investments in funds that are not traded in active markets. Substantially all investments of consolidated VIEs are corporate debt securities.
Debt
Debt of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs consisted of the following:
(in millions) Amount Effective Interest Rate
as of September 30, 2016  
Debt of consolidated SIPs due fiscal years 2017-2019 $75.0
 4.79%
Debt of consolidated VIEs due fiscal years 2018-2024 607.2
 2.24%
Total $682.2
  



81

Table of Contents

(in millions) Amount Effective Interest Rate
as of September 30, 2015  
Debt of consolidated SIPs due fiscal years 2016-2019 $81.2
 4.71%
Debt of consolidated VIEs due fiscal years 2018-2024 726.1
 1.62%
Total $807.3
  
The debt of consolidated SIPs had fixed and floating interest rates ranging from 2.36% to 6.19% at September 30, 2016, and from 2.30% to 5.81% at September 30, 2015. The repayment of amounts outstanding under the debt agreements is secured by the assets of the consolidated SIPs or a pledge of the right to call capital.
The debt of consolidated VIEs had floating interest rates ranging from 1.02% to 10.16% at September 30, 2016, and from 0.54% to 9.79% at September 30, 2015.
At September 30, 2016, contractual maturities for debt of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs were as follows:
(in millions) Carrying Amount
for the fiscal years ending September 30,
2017 $40.4
2018 79.8
2019 280.1
2020 
2021 
Thereafter 281.9
Total $682.2

Fair Value Measurements
Assets and liabilities of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEsCIPs measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows: 
(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
as of September 30, 2016    
Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents of consolidated VIEs $146.4
 $
 $
 $146.4
Receivables of consolidated VIEs 
 23.6
 
 23.6
Investments of consolidated SIPs        
Equity securities 155.4
 1.3
 605.5
 762.2
Debt securities 
 131.8
 131.6
 263.4
Investments of consolidated VIEs 
 487.1
 0.7
 487.8
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $301.8
 $643.8
 $737.8
 $1,683.4
Liabilities        
Other liabilities of consolidated SIPs $0.1
 $8.4
 $
 $8.5

(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
NAV as a
Practical
Expedient
 Total
as of September 30, 2019
Assets          
Investments          
Debt securities $0.1
 $1,083.6
 $131.4
 $
 $1,215.1
Equity securities 195.1
 223.9
 296.4
 204.1
 919.5
Real estate 
 
 152.7
 
 152.7
Loans 
 
 16.6
 
 16.6
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $195.2
 $1,307.5
 $597.1

$204.1
 $2,303.9

(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
NAV as a
Practical
Expedient
 Total
as of September 30, 2018
Assets          
Investments          
Debt securities $0.6
 $1,219.5
 $118.0
 $
 $1,338.1
Equity securities 270.7
 154.8
 199.7
 113.8
 739.0
Loans 
 
 32.3
 
 32.3
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $271.3
 $1,374.3
 $350.0
 $113.8
 $2,109.4
           
Liabilities          
Other liabilities $0.6
 $8.7
 $
 $
 $9.3


82

Table of Contents

(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
as of September 30, 2015    
Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents of consolidated VIEs $74.7
 $
 $
 $74.7
Receivables of consolidated VIEs 
 11.5
 
 11.5
Investments of consolidated SIPs        
Equity securities 88.9
 8.5
 656.4
 753.8
Debt securities 
 93.8
 129.8
 223.6
Investments of consolidated VIEs 
 672.1
 0.4
 672.5
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $163.6
 $785.9
 $786.6
 $1,736.1
Liabilities        
Other liabilities of consolidated SIPs $3.3
 $3.0
 $
 $6.3
Receivables of consolidated VIEs consist primarily of investment trades pending settlement. The fair value of the assets is obtained from independent third-party broker or dealer quotes.
Otherother liabilities, of consolidated SIPswhich consist of short positions in debt and equity securities. The fair value of the liabilitiessecurities, is determined based on the fair value of the underlying securities using quoted market prices, or independent third-party broker or dealer price quotes if quoted market prices securities are not available.
Investments in fund products for which fair value was estimated using reported NAV as a practical expedient were as follows:
(in millions)   Fair Value Level    
as of September 30, Redemption Frequency  2016 2015
Real estate and private equity funds Nonredeemable 3 $444.2
 $463.6
Hedge funds Triennially 3 1.0
 1.2
Hedge funds Monthly or quarterly 2 0.8
 8.0
Total     $446.0
 $472.8
The investments inconsist of nonredeemable real estate and private equity fundsfunds. These investments are expected to be returned through distributions over the life of the funds as a result of liquidations of the funds’ underlying assets over a weighted-average period of 3.24.4 years and 3.93.5 years at September 30, 20162019 and 2015.2018. The consolidated SIPs’CIPs’ unfunded commitments to these funds totaled $74.4$168.7 million and $94.5$1.9 million, at September 30, 2016 and 2015, of which the Company was contractually obligated to fund $2.2$20.6 million and $2.4$0.4 million based on its ownership percentage in the SIPs.CIPs, at September 30, 2019 and 2018.


83

Table of Contents

Changes in Level 3 assets were as follows:
(in millions) 
Equity
Securities
 
Debt
Securities
 Real Estate Loans 
Total
Level 3
Assets
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019
Balance at beginning of year $199.7
 $118.0
 $
 $32.3
 $350.0
Acquisition 45.2
 39.7
 
 
 84.9
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in investment and other income, net 8.0
 (13.9) 5.0
 (3.3) (4.2)
Purchases 155.5
 12.0
 147.0
 9.2
 323.7
Sales and settlements (81.4) (20.2) 
 (21.6) (123.2)
Transfers into Level 3 0.1
 0.4
 
 
 0.5
Transfers out of Level 3 (25.4) (3.6) 
 
 (29.0)
Foreign exchange revaluation (5.3) (1.0) 0.7
 
 (5.6)
Balance at End of Year $296.4
 $131.4
 $152.7
 $16.6
 $597.1
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income relating to assets held at end of year $(6.3) $(5.7) $5.0
 $(0.6) $(7.6)
(in millions) 
Equity
Securities
 
Debt
Securities
 Loans 
Total
Level 3
Assets
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018
Balance at beginning of year $160.7
 $135.4
 $
 $296.1
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in investment and other income, net 26.2
 4.9
 (0.7) 30.4
Purchases 32.0
 16.2
 26.0
 74.2
Sales and settlements (17.5) (39.1) 
 (56.6)
Consolidation 
 
 7.0
 7.0
Foreign exchange revaluation (1.7) 0.6
 
 (1.1)
Balance at End of Year $199.7
 $118.0
 $32.3
 $350.0
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income relating to assets held at end of year $17.3
 $0.8
 $(0.7) $17.4

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, or into or out of Level 3 during fiscal years 2016 and 2015.year 2018.
Changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

(in millions) 
Investments of
Consolidated SIPs
 
Investments of
Consolidated VIEs
 
Total
Level 3 Assets
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 Equity Debt  
Balance at October 1, 2015 $656.4
 $129.8
 $0.4
 $786.6
Realized and unrealized losses included in investment and other income, net (7.3) (10.3) (0.2) (17.8)
Purchases 60.6
 26.3
 0.5
 87.4
Sales (103.5) (15.4) 
 (118.9)
Foreign exchange revaluation (0.7) 1.2
 
 0.5
Balance at September 30, 2016 $605.5
 $131.6
 $0.7
 $737.8
Change in unrealized losses included in net income relating to assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2016 $(13.3) $(10.7) $(0.2) $(24.2)



8384

Table of Contents

(in millions) 
Investments of
Consolidated SIPs
 
Investments of
Consolidated VIEs
 
Total
Level 3 Assets
 
Debt of
Consolidated VIEs
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 Equity Debt   
Balance at October 1, 2014 $614.3
 $206.3
 $0.5
 $821.1
 $(47.2)
Adjustment for adoption of new accounting guidance 
 
 
 
 47.2
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in investment and other income, net 39.5
 (5.6) (0.1) 33.8
 
Purchases 142.8
 25.8
 
 168.6
 
Sales (134.7) (88.9) 
 (223.6) 
Settlements 
 (0.6) 
 (0.6) 
Foreign exchange revaluation (5.5) (7.2) 
 (12.7) 
Balance at September 30, 2015 $656.4

$129.8

$0.4

$786.6

$
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income relating to assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2015 $28.0
 $(10.4) $(0.1) $17.5
 $

Valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements were as follows:
(in millions)           
as of September 30, 2016 Fair Value Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs Range (Weighted Average)
as of September 30, 2019 Fair Value Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs 
Range (Weighted Average 1)
Equity securities$176.9
Market comparable companiesEnterprise value/
EBITDA multiple
4.5–11.8 (8.1)
  Discount for lack of marketability 15.0%–30.0% (23.1%)
Risk premium 18.9%
 $113.1
 
Market comparable companies

 EBITDA multiple 5.0–14.2 (10.3)Enterprise value/
Revenue multiple
 3.7
Discount for lack of marketability 25.0%–50.0% (36.6%)97.2
Discounted cash flowDiscount rate 4.8%–16.3% (10.3%)
24.3
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 5.0%–19.0% (13.7%) Discount for lack of marketability 17.0%
22.9
 Market pricing Price to book value ratio 1.8–2.3 (2.0)22.3
Market pricingPrivate sale pricing $0.25–td0.13 (td.06) per share
     
Debt securities 119.0
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 6.0%–15.0% (10.4%) 115.5
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 4.8%–17.4% (9.7%)
 Risk premium 0.0%–28.0% (9.7%)Discount for lack of marketability 17.0%–24.7% (22.9%)
 EBITDA multiple 5.515.9
 Market comparable companies Price-to-earnings ratio 10.0
12.6
 Market pricing Private sale pricing $57 per td00 of parEnterprise value/
EBITDA multiple
 21.9
   
Real estate 84.7
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 6.4%–7.4% (7.1%)
68.0
Yield capitalization Equivalent yield 4.3%–6.1% (5.4%)
   
Loans 16.6
 Discounted cash flow Loss-adjusted discount rate 3.0%–23.9% (12.0%)
__________________
1
Based on the relative fair value of the instruments.
(in millions)        
as of September 30, 2018Fair ValueValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable InputsRange (Weighted Average)
Equity securities $171.9
 Market comparable companies Enterprise value/
EBITDA multiple
 5.0–13.6 (9.3)
27.8
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 8.0%–16.5% (14.1%)
         
Debt securities 78.7
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 7.0%–14.8% (10.8%)
33.9
 Comparable trading multiple Price-to-earnings ratio 10.0
Enterprise value/
EBITDA multiple
 20.9
5.4
 Market pricing Private sale pricing $42 per $100 of par
         
Loans 32.3
 Discounted cash flow Loss-adjusted discount rate 3.0%–22.7% (12.0%)

(in millions)        
as of September 30, 2015 Fair Value Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs Range (Weighted Average)
Equity securities $128.8
 
Market comparable companies

 EBITDA multiple 4.2–10.7 (8.8)
Discount for lack of marketability 25.0%–50.0% (34.9%)
47.7
 Market pricing Price to book value ratio 1.8–2.8 (2.3)
15.1
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 6.3%–19.0% (12.8%)
         
Debt securities 129.8
 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 3.5%–17.0% (9.4%)
     Risk premium 0.0%–18.0% (4.6%)
Level 3 equity securities held by consolidated SIPs consisted primarily of common and preferred shares, and debt securities consisted of corporate loans and notes and mezzanine loans at September 30, 2016 and 2015.
The fair values of $445.2 million and $464.8 million of investments in various funds held by consolidated SIPs for which fair value was estimated using NAV as a practical expedient are excluded fromIf the above two tables at September 30, 2016 and 2015.



84

Table of Contents

Following are descriptions of the sensitivity of the Level 3 recurring fair value measurements to changesrelevant significant inputs used in the significant unobservable inputs presented in the above tables.
For securities utilizing the market comparable companies valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the EBITDA multiple in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. A significant increase (decrease) inmarket-based valuations, other than the discount for lack of marketability in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher)and risk premium, were independently higher (lower) as of September 30, 2019, the resulting fair value measurement. Theof the assets would be higher (lower). If the relevant significant inputs used in the discounted cash flow or yield capitalization valuations, as well as the discount for lack of marketability used to determine fair value may include other factors such as liquidity or credit risk.
For securities utilizing the discounted cash flow valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the discount rate orand risk premium in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher)the market-based valuations, were independently higher (lower) as of September 30, 2019, the resulting fair value measurement. Generally, a change inof the discount rate is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the risk premium. A significant increase (decrease) in the EBITDA multiple in isolationassets would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.be lower (higher).
For securities utilizing a market pricing valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the price to book value ratio would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

85

Table of Contents

Financial instruments of consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEsCIPs that were not measured at fair value were as follows:
(in millions) 
Fair Value
Level
 2019 2018
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated
Fair Value
as of September 30,
Financial Asset          
Cash and cash equivalents 1 $154.2
 $154.2
 $299.8
 $299.8
Financial Liability          
Debt 3 $50.8
 $51.0
 $32.6
 $32.4

(in millions)   September 30, 2016 September 30, 2015
 Fair Value Level Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value
Financial Assets          
Cash and cash equivalents of consolidated SIPs 1 $89.8
 $89.8
 $108.5
 $108.5
Financial Liabilities          
Debt of consolidated SIPs 3 75.0
 74.6
 81.2
 77.9
Debt of consolidated VIEs1
 2 or 3 607.2
 594.5
 726.1
 719.3
Debt
_________________Debt of CIPs totaled $50.8 million and $32.6 million at September 30, 2019 and 2018. The debt had fixed and floating interest rates ranging from 2.08% to 7.94% with a weighted-average effective interest rate of 5.09% at September 30, 2019, and from 3.07% to 7.88% with a weighted-average effective interest rate of 6.79% at September 30, 2018.
1    Substantially all is Level 2.The contractual maturities for debt of CIPs at September 30, 2019 were as follows:
(in millions)  
for the fiscal years ending September 30,Amount
2020 $23.3
2021 7.5
2022 
2023 
2024 20.0
Total $50.8

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Changes in redeemable noncontrolling interests of consolidated SIPsCIPs were as follows:
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30,201920182017
Balance at beginning of year $1,043.6
 $1,941.9
 $61.1
Adoption of new accounting guidance 
 
 824.7
Net income (loss) 6.2
 (12.8) 53.0
Net subscriptions and other 1,046.6
 170.9
 884.3
Net consolidations (deconsolidations) (1,349.7) (1,056.4) 118.8
Balance at End of Year $746.7
 $1,043.6
 $1,941.9

(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Balance at beginning of year $59.6
 $234.8
 $121.8
Net income (loss) 1.6
 (6.1) 20.6
Net subscriptions and other 79.9
 149.4
 436.0
Net deconsolidations (80.0) (318.5) (343.6)
Balance at End of Year $61.1
 $59.6
 $234.8

Note 12 Nonconsolidated Variable Interest Entities


85

Table of Contents

Nonconsolidated VIEs
VIEs for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary consist of sponsored funds and other investment products fromin which the Company earns investment management fees and/or in which it has an equity ownership interest.
The carrying values of the investment management fees receivable from and the equity ownership interests in these VIEs included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets are set forth below. These amounts represent the Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs consists of equity investments and investment products.management and other fee receivables as follows:
(in millions)    
as of September 30, 2019 2018
Investments $458.1
 $161.8
Receivables 149.5
 140.1
Total $607.6
 $301.9




86

Table of Contents
(in millions)    
as of September 30, 2016 2015
Receivables $21.4
 $35.5
Investments 77.3
 236.6
Total $98.7
 $272.1

While the Company has no legal or contractual obligation to do so, it routinely makes cash investments in the course of launching SIPs.sponsored funds. The Company also may voluntarily elect to provide its SIPssponsored funds with additional direct or indirect financial support based on its business objectives. During fiscal year 2016, the Company purchased $182.7 million of certain debt securities from six SIPs domiciled in India in order to provide additional liquidity to the SIPs. The Company did not provide financial or other support to its SIPssponsored funds during fiscal year 2015.2019. During fiscal year 2018, the Company purchased $32.6 million of certain equity and debt securities from 2 sponsored funds.
Note 1013 – Taxes on Income
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“the Tax Act”), which was enacted into law in the U.S. in December 2017, includes various changes to the tax law, including a permanent reduction in the corporate income tax rate and assessment of a one-time transition tax on the deemed repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign subsidiaries’ earnings. The estimated related changes in the Company’s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities resulted in a $35.6 million decrease in deferred tax assets, an $88.9 million decrease in deferred tax liabilities and a $53.3 million net tax benefit in fiscal year 2018. The Company also reclassified $0.1 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings related to stranded tax effects resulting from the change in tax rate during fiscal year 2018.
The Company completed its analysis of the Tax Act impact during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 with no significant adjustment to the provisional amounts previously recorded. The estimated transition tax expense recognized in fiscal year 2018 of $983.2 million was net of an $87.6 million tax benefit related to U.S. taxation of deemed foreign dividends. This benefit was reversed during fiscal year 2019 upon issuance of final regulations by the U.S. Department of Treasury, resulting in increased income tax expense and gross unrecognized tax benefits.
The remaining federal portion of the transition tax liability was $827.9 million at September 30, 2019, and will be paid over the next seven years, with 8% of the original liability payable in each of the next four years, 15% in year five, 20% in year six and 25% in year seven.
The Tax Act reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. The Company’s federal statutory rate for fiscal year 2018 was a blended rate of 24.5%, based on the pre- and post-Tax Act rates.
Prior to the Tax Act, the Company had not provided for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings and other outside basis differences of its non-U.S. subsidiaries as it was the Company’s intention for these tax basis differences to remain indefinitely reinvested. Following the Company’s change in policy effective January 1, 2018 to repatriate earnings of substantially all non-U.S. subsidiaries, other outside basis differences, which arose primarily from purchase accounting adjustments, undistributed earnings that are considered indefinitely reinvested and foreign earnings that are restricted by operational and regulatory requirements, remain indefinitely reinvested. These basis differences could reverse through sales of the subsidiaries or the receipt of dividends from the subsidiaries, as well as various other events, none of which are considered probable as of September 30, 2019. The Company has made no provision for U.S. income taxes on these outside basis differences, and determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to such basis differences is not practicable.
Taxes on income were as follows:
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Current expense      
Federal $343.4
 $1,343.7
 $585.0
State 37.0
 38.0
 65.3
Non-U.S. 66.8
 141.1
 100.2
Deferred expense (benefit) (4.9) (50.3) 8.9
Total $442.3
 $1,472.5
 $759.4

(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Current expense      
Federal $582.8
 $733.9
 $803.6
State 47.5
 83.1
 82.4
Non-U.S. 102.8
 121.1
 114.1
Deferred expense (benefit) 9.0
 (14.4) (2.2)
Total $742.1
 $923.7
 $997.9
The tax benefit from the utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards was insignificant in fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014. The Company had a tax shortfall of $5.9$8.7 million in fiscal year 2017 associated with stock-based compensation plans, in fiscal year 2016 and tax benefits of $10.9 million and $13.3 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014which reducedincreased the amount of income taxes that would have otherwise been payable. The tax shortfallpayable and benefits arewas reflected as componentsa component of stockholders equity. Income tax effects of stock-based awards are recognized in income tax expense beginning in fiscal year 2018 in accordance with revised accounting guidance.


87

Table of Contents

Income before taxes consisted of the following:
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
U.S. $1,151.1
 $1,458.1
 $1,594.5
Non-U.S. 496.7
 757.1
 954.6
Total $1,647.8
 $2,215.2
 $2,549.1

(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
U.S. $1,641.7
 $2,026.4
 $2,160.8
Non-U.S. 858.1
 1,002.0
 1,248.8
Total $2,499.8
 $3,028.4
 $3,409.6
The Company’s income in certain countries is subject to reduced tax rates due to tax rulings.rulings and incentives. The impact of the reduced rates on income tax expense was $34.24.1 million or $0.060.01 per diluted share for fiscal year 20162019, $68.331.3 million or $0.110.06 per diluted share for fiscal year 20152018, and $100.628.8 million or $0.160.05 per diluted share for fiscal year 20142017. TheOne tax rulingsincentive remained in effect at September 30, 2019 which will expire in fiscal years 2019 and 2022.



86

Table of Contents

December 2023.
The significant components of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as follows:
(in millions)    
as of September 30, 2019 2018
Deferred Tax Assets    
Deferred compensation and benefits $39.7
 $33.1
Net operating loss carry-forwards 31.9
 31.8
Stock-based compensation 19.6
 21.9
Unrealized foreign exchange losses 11.0
 3.7
Tax benefit for uncertain tax positions 8.7
 10.0
Other 21.7
 15.0
Total deferred tax assets 132.6
 115.5
Valuation allowance (26.9) (27.5)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance 105.7
 88.0
Deferred Tax Liabilities    
Goodwill and other purchased intangibles 159.5
 142.2
Depreciation on fixed assets 22.5
 20.9
Investments in partnerships 6.6
 16.4
Other 16.4
 17.7
Total deferred tax liabilities 205.0
 197.2
Net Deferred Tax Liability $99.3
 $109.2
(in millions)    
as of September 30, 2016 2015
Deferred Tax Assets    
Deferred compensation and employee benefits $52.9
 $60.8
Stock-based compensation 36.6
 38.7
Net operating loss carry-forwards 32.5
 40.3
Tax benefit for uncertain tax positions 19.8
 29.6
Other 12.5
 11.6
Total deferred tax assets 154.3
 181.0
Valuation allowance for net operating loss carry-forwards (24.6) (34.0)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance 129.7
 147.0
Deferred Tax Liabilities    
Goodwill and other purchased intangibles 202.8
 217.3
Deferred commissions 18.3
 21.2
Depreciation on fixed assets 18.0
 13.4
Other 34.4
 35.8
Total deferred tax liabilities 273.5
 287.7
Net Deferred Tax Liability $143.8
 $140.7

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities that relate to the same tax jurisdiction are presented net on the consolidated balance sheets. The components of the net deferred tax liability were classified in the consolidated balance sheets as follows:
(in millions)        
as of September 30, 2016 2015 2019 2018
Other assets $17.7
 $100.7
 $20.8
 $17.3
Deferred tax liabilities 161.5
 241.4
 120.1
 126.5
Net Deferred Tax Liability $143.8
 $140.7
 $99.3
 $109.2
At September 30, 20162019, there were $135.8155.0 million of non-U.S. net operating loss carry-forwards, $68.573.7 million of which expire between 2018fiscal years 2020 and 20262038 with the remaining carry-forwards having an indefinite life. In addition, there were $74.234.8 million in state net operating loss carry-forwards that expire between 2017fiscal years 2020 and 20362039. A partial valuation allowance has been provided to offset the related deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefit of the net operating loss carry-forwards. The valuation allowance decreased $9.40.6 million in fiscal year 20162019 and increased $7.72.3 million in fiscal year 20152018.
The Company has made no provision for U.S. income taxes on $8.5 billion of cumulative undistributed non-U.S. earnings that are indefinitely reinvested at September 30, 2016. Determination of the potential amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability related to such reinvested non-U.S. earnings is not practicable because of the numerous assumptions associated with this hypothetical calculation. However, foreign tax credits would be available to reduce some portion of this amount. Changes to the Company’s policy of reinvestment or repatriation of non-U.S. earnings may have a significant effect on its financial condition and results of operations.





8788

Table of Contents


A reconciliation of the amount of tax expense at the federal statutory rate and taxes on income as reflected in the consolidated statements of income is as follows:
(in millions)            
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Federal taxes at statutory rate $346.0
 21.0% $542.7
 24.5% $892.2
 35.0%
Transition tax on deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings 86.0
 5.2% 983.2
 44.4% 
 
Revaluation of net deferred tax liabilities 
 
 (53.3) (2.4%) 
 
Other Tax Act impacts 0.4
 
 38.9
 1.8% 
 
State taxes, net of federal tax effect 29.7
 1.8% 16.6
 0.7% 41.4
 1.6%
Effect of non-U.S. operations (21.3) (1.3%) (61.9) (2.8%) (146.2) (5.7%)
Effect of net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (2.1) (0.1%) 5.3
 0.2% (32.6) (1.3%)
Other 3.6
 0.2% 1.0
 0.1% 4.6
 0.2%
Tax Provision $442.3
 26.8% $1,472.5
 66.5% $759.4
 29.8%

(in millions)            
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Federal taxes at statutory rate $874.9
 35.0% $1,059.9
 35.0% $1,193.4
 35.0%
State taxes, net of federal tax effect 42.7
 1.7% 51.6
 1.7% 52.4
 1.5%
Effect of non-U.S. operations (153.0) (6.1%) (148.5) (4.9%) (246.3) (7.2%)
Effect of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (10.9) (0.4%) (24.3) (0.8%) (9.6) (0.3%)
Other (11.6) (0.5%) (15.0) (0.5%) 8.0
 0.3%
Tax Provision $742.1
 29.7% $923.7
 30.5% $997.9
 29.3%
Other Tax Act impacts consist primarily of foreign dividend distribution taxes and tax withholdings.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Balance at beginning of year $77.5
 $81.1
 $82.1
Additions for tax positions of prior years 131.8
 3.6
 6.6
Reductions for tax positions of prior years (2.9) (6.6) (1.3)
Tax positions related to the current year 10.7
 11.6
 11.6
Settlements with taxing authorities (2.2) 
 (5.2)
Expirations of statute of limitations (12.3) (12.2) (12.7)
Balance at End of Year $202.6
 $77.5
 $81.1
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Balance at beginning of year $105.2
 $118.2
 $109.5
Additions for tax positions of prior years 0.6
 12.6
 3.0
Reductions for tax positions of prior years (9.0) (3.4) (2.4)
Tax positions related to the current year 12.9
 16.2
 14.1
Settlements with taxing authorities (5.4) (0.1) (0.3)
Expirations of statute of limitations (22.2) (38.3) (5.7)
Balance at End of Year $82.1
 $105.2
 $118.2

If recognized, substantially all of the balance, net of any deferred tax benefits, would favorably affect the Company’s effective income tax rate in future periods.
Accrued interest on uncertain tax positions at September 30, 20162019 and 20152018 was $9.611.9 million and $11.211.3 million, and is not presented in the unrecognized tax benefits table above. Interest expense (benefit) of $(1.3)0.7 million, $(6.6)0.9 million and $2.41.6 million was recognized during fiscal years 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017. Accrued penalties at September 30, 20162019 and 20152018 were insignificant.
The Company files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, multiple U.S. state and local income tax returns, and income tax returns in multiple non-U.S. jurisdictions. The Company is subject to examination by the taxing authorities in these jurisdictions. The Company’s major tax jurisdictions and the tax years for which the statutes of limitations have not expired are as follows: India 2003 to 2016;2019; Canada 20092011 to 2016;2019; Hong Kong 20102013 to 2016;2019; Singapore 20112014 to 2016;2019; Luxembourg 2012 to 2016;and the U.K. 20152018 to 2016;2019; U.S. federal 20132016 to 2016;2019; the StateStates of California 2008 to 2010,Florida and 2012 to 2016; the State of Minnesota, and City of New York 20122015 to 2016;2019; and the States of Florida,California, Massachusetts and New York 20132016 to 2016.2019.
The Company has on-goingongoing examinations in various stages of completion in the State of Minnesota,Florida, City of New York, Canada, Hong Kong, IndiaFrance, Germany and South Africa.India. Examination outcomes and the timing of settlements are subject to significant uncertainty. Such settlements may involve some or all of the following: the payment of additional taxes, the adjustment of deferred taxes and/or the recognition of unrecognized tax benefits. The Company has recognized a tax benefit only for those positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold. It is reasonably possible that the total unrecognized tax benefit as of September 30, 20162019 could decrease by an estimated $19.213.9 million within the next twelve months as a result of the expiration of statutes of limitations in the U.S. federal and certain U.S. state and local and non-U.S. tax jurisdictions, and potential settlements with U.S. states and non-U.S. taxing authorities.





8889

Table of Contents


Note 1114 – Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
On July 28,In 2016 a putativeand 2017, two former employees filed related class action lawsuit captioned Cryer v. Franklin Resources, Inc., et al. was filedlawsuits in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, against Franklin,which were later consolidated, relating to the Franklin Templeton 401(k) Retirement Plan (“Plan”) Investment Committee,. The consolidated action named as defendants Franklin, the Plan’s fiduciary committees and unnamed Investment Committee members.certain committee members, and the Franklin Board of Directors and certain individual directors. The plaintiff attempts to assert a claim for breach ofplaintiffs principally claimed that the defendants breached their fiduciary dutyduties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act alleging that the defendants selectedby, among other things, selecting certain mutual funds sponsored and managed by the Company (the “Funds”) as investment options for the Plan, when allegedly lower-costlower cost and better performing non-proprietarythird-party investment vehiclesoptions were available. The plaintiff also claims thatavailable, and further challenged the total Plan costs, inclusivePlan’s record keeping fees as excessive. On December 3, 2018, Franklin elected to enter into an agreement-in-principle to resolve the litigation for a cash payment of investment management$13.9 million, which the Company accrued, and, administrative fees, are excessive. The plaintiff alleges that Plan losses exceed $88.0 million and seeks, among other things, damages, disgorgement, rescissionPlan changes, an increase in the Company’s existing matching contribution rate from 75% to 85% for eligible participant contributions for a period of three years. On October 4, 2019, the court issued final approval of the Plan’s investments inagreement and dismissed the Funds, attorneys’ fees and costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest. Franklin filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and a motion for summary adjudication on October 24, 2016. Management strongly believes that the claims made in the lawsuit are without merit and intends to defend against them vigorously. Franklin cannot predict with certainty, however, the eventual outcome of the lawsuit or whether it will have a material negative impact on the Company.litigation.
The Company is from time to time involved in other litigation relating to claims arising in the normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of such claims will not materially affect the Companys business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity. In managements opinion, an adequate accrual has been made as of September 30, 20162019 to provide for any probable losses that may arise from such matters for which the Company could reasonably estimate an amount.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases office space and equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates through fiscal year 2032. Lease expense was $69.361.7 million, $58.055.9 million and $58.256.3 million in fiscal years 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017. Sublease income totaled $1.60.3 million in fiscal year 2016, $0.2 million and $1.7$0.4 million in fiscal years 20152019, 2018 and 20142017.
Future minimum lease payments under long-term non-cancelable operating leases were as follows as of September 30, 20162019:
(in millions)  
for the fiscal years ending September 30, Amount
2020 $49.5
2021 45.3
2022 40.9
2023 39.1
2024 36.7
Thereafter 149.1
Total Minimum Lease Payments $360.6

(in millions)  
for the fiscal years ending September 30, Amount
2017 $44.7
2018 43.1
2019 39.0
2020 31.6
2021 28.0
Thereafter 190.2
Total Minimum Lease Payments $376.6
Future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable subleases totaled $0.8 millionwere insignificant at September 30, 20162019.
While the Company has no legal or contractual obligation to do so, it routinely makes cash investments in the course of launching SIPs.sponsored funds. At September 30, 20162019, the Company had $35.2$267.8 million of committed capital contributions which relate to discretionary commitments to invest in SIPssponsored funds and other investment products.products and entities. These unfunded commitments are not recorded in the Companys consolidated balance sheet.





8990

Table of Contents


Note 1215 – Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s stock-based compensation plans consist of the Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the “AIP”), the 2002 Universal Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “USIP”) and the amended and restated Franklin Resources, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Investment Plan (the “ESIP”). The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determines the terms and conditions of awards under the AIP, the USIP and the ESIP.
Stock-based compensation expenses were as follows:
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Stock and stock unit awards $105.7
 $111.6
 $117.0
Employee stock investment plan 5.8
 6.2
 6.4
Total $111.5
 $117.8
 $123.4
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Stock and stock unit awards $125.3
 $133.6
 $121.1
Employee stock investment plan 6.2
 6.4
 6.6
Total $131.5
 $140.0
 $127.7

Stock and Stock Unit Awards
Under the terms of the AIP, eligible employees may receive cash, equity awards and/or mutual fund unit awards generally based on the performance of the Company and/or its funds, and the individual employee. The USIP provides for the issuance of the Company’s common stock for various stock-related awards to officers, directors and employees. There are 120.0 million shares authorized under the USIP, of which 24.314.3 million shares were available for grant at September 30, 2016.2019.
Stock awards generally entitle holders to the right to sell the underlying shares of the Company’s common stock once the awards vest. Stock unit awards generally entitle holders to receive the underlying shares of common stock once the awards vest. Awards generally vest based on the passage of time or the achievement of predetermined Company financial performance goals. In the event a performance measure is not achieved at or above a specified threshold level, the portion of the award tied to such performance measure is forfeited.
Stock and stock unit award activity was as follows:
(shares in thousands) 
Time-Based
Shares
 
Performance-
Based Shares
 
Total
Shares
 
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019    
Nonvested balance at September 30, 2018 2,678
 1,813
 4,491
 $39.08
Granted 3,906
 897
 4,803
 30.75
Vested (2,347) (606) (2,953) 35.80
Forfeited/canceled (459) (250) (709) 36.23
Nonvested balance at September 30, 2019 3,778
 1,854
 5,632
 $34.06

(shares in thousands) Time-Based Shares Performance-Based Shares Total Shares 
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016    
Nonvested balance at September 30, 2015 2,085
 1,173
 3,258
 $53.97
Granted 2,703
 679
 3,382
 40.88
Vested (2,087) (402) (2,489) 49.51
Forfeited/canceled (332) (162) (494) 48.19
Nonvested Balance at September 30, 2016 2,369
 1,288
 3,657
 $45.67
Total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock and stock unit awards net of estimated forfeitures, was $122.5131.0 million at September 30, 20162019. This expense is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.61.8 years. The weighted-average grant-date fair values of stock awards and stock unit awards granted during fiscal years 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017 were $40.8830.75, $55.6542.63 and $53.8934.23 per share. The total fair value of stock and stock unit awards vested during the same periods was $92.884.2 million, $115.291.5 million and $153.0104.0 million.
The Company generally does not repurchase shares upon vesting of stock and stock unit awards. However, in order to pay taxes due in connection with the vesting of employee and executive officer stock and stock unit awards, shares are repurchased using a net stock issuance method.
Stock Options
There were no stock options outstanding at September 30, 2016 or 2015, and no stock option activity during fiscal years 2016 or 2015. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal year 2014 was $17.9 million. The cash received from the exercises was $7.2 million and the income tax benefits were $5.9 million.



90

Table of Contents

Employee Stock Investment Plan
The ESIP allows eligible participants to buy shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount of its market value on defined dates. A total of 0.80.9 million shares were issued under the ESIP during fiscal year 20162019, and 4.41.9 million shares were reserved for future issuance at September 30, 20162019.


91

Table of Contents

Note 1316 – Defined Contribution Plans
The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan thatwhich covers substantially all U.S. employees who meetmeeting certain employment requirements. Participants may contribute up to 50% of pretax annual compensationtheir eligible salary and up to 100% of the cash portion of the participantstheir year-end bonus, as defined by the plan and subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations, each year to the plan. In addition, certainThe Company makes a matching contribution equal to 75% of eligible compensation contributed by participants. Under the terms of a litigation settlement, the Company will increase its matching contribution rate from 75% to 85% for a period of three years beginning January 1, 2020. See Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies for information related to the litigation. Certain of the Companys non-U.S. subsidiaries also sponsor defined contribution plans primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation incentives for its employees and to comply with local regulatory requirements. The total expenses recognized for defined contribution plans were $46.852.2 million, $46.449.8 million and $47.045.5 million for fiscal years 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017.
Note 1417 – Segment and Geographic Information
The Company has one1 operating segment, investment management and related services.
Geographic information was as follows:
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Operating Revenues      
United States $3,487.6
 $3,693.2
 $3,870.6
Luxembourg 1,533.7
 1,732.5
 1,654.8
Americas excluding United States 392.3
 478.4
 483.3
Asia-Pacific 257.0
 299.7
 282.6
Europe, Middle East and Africa, excluding Luxembourg 103.9
 115.3
 100.9
Total $5,774.5
 $6,319.1
 $6,392.2
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues      
United States $4,063.6
 $4,634.2
 $5,014.4
Luxembourg 1,707.9
 2,278.6
 2,034.0
Canada 273.8
 339.0
 357.6
Asia-Pacific 267.9
 311.8
 420.2
The Bahamas 204.6
 250.2
 492.7
Europe, the Middle East and Africa, excluding Luxembourg 94.0
 126.8
 159.8
Latin America 6.2
 8.1
 12.7
Total $6,618.0
 $7,948.7
 $8,491.4

(in millions)      
as of September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Property and Equipment, Net      
United States $542.8
 $465.4
 $426.1
Europe, Middle East and Africa 90.0
 10.1
 12.2
Asia-Pacific 40.7
 42.1
 60.2
Americas excluding United States 10.2
 17.4
 18.7
Total $683.7
 $535.0
 $517.2
(in millions)      
as of September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Property and Equipment, Net      
United States $428.0
 $406.9
 $417.0
Asia-Pacific 62.9
 68.9
 78.0
Europe, the Middle East and Africa 14.9
 14.8
 13.8
The Bahamas 14.3
 14.6
 15.1
Canada 3.1
 4.5
 5.9
Latin America 
 0.4
 0.9
Total $523.2
 $510.1
 $530.7

Operating revenues are generally allocatedattributed to geographic areas based on the locationlocations of the office providing services.subsidiaries that provide the services, which may differ from the regions in which the related investment products are sold.





9192

Table of Contents


Note 1518 – Other Income (Expenses)
Other income (expenses) consisted of the following:
(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 2018 2017
Investment and Other Income, Net      
Dividend income $97.0
 $51.1
 $13.9
Interest income 31.0
 76.5
 74.9
Gains (losses) on investments, net (9.7) 6.0
 23.6
Income (losses) from investments in equity method investees (10.4) 44.4
 107.9
Gains (losses) on investments of CIPs, net (26.3) (55.0) 118.2
Rental income 19.8
 15.9
 11.1
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses), net 13.1
 0.6
 (16.0)
Other, net 0.6
 5.8
 2.7
Total 115.1

145.3

336.3
Interest Expense (24.7) (48.7) (51.5)
Other Income, Net $90.4
 $96.6
 $284.8

(in millions)      
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014
Investment and Other Income, Net      
Dividend income $20.6
 $10.3
 $10.1
Interest income 36.5
 10.8
 9.1
Gains (losses) on trading investment securities, net 50.1
 (22.3) 10.4
Realized gains on sale of investment securities, available-for-sale 32.1
 28.1
 57.8
Realized losses on sale of investment securities, available-for-sale (3.2) (4.0) (1.0)
Income (losses) from investments in equity method investees 56.7
 (63.2) 68.1
Other-than-temporary impairment of investments (11.1) (10.0) (0.6)
Gains (losses) on investments of consolidated SIPs, net (13.5) 18.0
 33.9
Gains from consolidated VIEs, net 6.2
 8.3
 7.1
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses), net (2.9) 57.0
 32.1
Other, net 12.5
 7.4
 8.8
Total 184.0

40.4

235.8
Interest Expense (49.9) (39.6) (47.4)
Other Income, Net $134.1
 $0.8
 $188.4
Substantially all of the Company’s dividend income and realized gains and losses on sale of available-for-sale securities werewas generated by investments in its nonconsolidated SIPs.funds. Interest income was primarily generated by cash equivalents and debt securities. Gains (losses) on investments, net consists primarily of other-than-temporary impairment of investments and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities measured at fair value and trading investmentdebt securities.
There were no sales of available-for-sale securities and cash equivalents.in fiscal year 2019. Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities were $269.485.5 million, $221.3 million and $380.451.6 million for in fiscal years 2016, 20152018 and 20142017.
Net gains (losses)losses recognized on the Companysequity securities measured at fair value and trading investmentdebt securities that were held by the Company at September 30, 2016, 20152019 were $0.1 million, and 2014 were $27.9 million, $(20.3) million and $5.2 million. Netnet gains (losses) recognized on trading investment securities that were held by the Company at September 30, 2018 and 2017 were $(1.7) million and $5.0 million. Net gains (losses) recognized on investment securities of consolidated SIPsCIPs that were held at September 30, 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017 were $1.0 million, $9.4(24.5) million, $(17.7) million and $3.721.9 million.





9293

Table of Contents


Note 1619 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component were as follows:
(in millions) Unrealized Gains on Investments Currency Translation Adjustments Unrealized Losses on Defined Benefit Plans Total
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016    
Balance at October 1, 2015 $19.3
 $(327.8) $(5.7) $(314.2)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax 2.7
 (18.3) (2.4) (18.0)
Reclassifications to net investment and other income, net of tax (15.2) 
 
 (15.2)
Total other comprehensive loss (12.5) (18.3) (2.4) (33.2)
Balance at September 30, 2016 $6.8
 $(346.1) $(8.1) $(347.4)
(in millions) Currency
Translation
Adjustments
 Unrealized
Losses on
Defined Benefit
Plans
 Unrealized
Gains on
Investments
 Total
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019   
Balance at October 1, 2018 $(372.9) $(4.2) $6.5
 $(370.6)
Adoption of new accounting guidance 
 
 (8.0) (8.0)
Other comprehensive income (loss)        
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, net of tax (53.9) (2.4) (5.4) (61.7)
Reclassifications to compensation and benefits expense, net of tax 
 0.4
 
 0.4
Reclassifications to net investment and other income, net of tax 1.4
 
 6.9
 8.3
Total other comprehensive income (loss) (52.5) (2.0) 1.5
 (53.0)
Balance at September 30, 2019 $(425.4) $(6.2) $
 $(431.6)
(in millions) 
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
 Unrealized
Losses on
Defined Benefit
Plans
 Unrealized
Gains on
Investments
 Total
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018   
Balance at October 1, 2017 $(281.0) $(6.0) $2.2
 $(284.8)
Adoption of new accounting guidance 
 (0.1) 
 (0.1)
Other comprehensive income (loss)        
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax (85.5) 1.5
 7.3
 (76.7)
Reclassifications to compensation and benefits expense, net of tax 
 0.4
 
 0.4
Reclassifications to net investment and other income, net of tax (6.4) 
 (3.0) (9.4)
Total other comprehensive income (loss) (91.9) 1.9
 4.3
 (85.7)
Balance at September 30, 2018 $(372.9) $(4.2) $6.5
 $(370.6)

(in millions) Unrealized Gains on Investments Currency Translation Adjustments Unrealized Losses on Defined Benefit Plans Total
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015    
Balance at October 1, 2014 $31.0
 $(143.6) $(5.1) $(117.7)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax 1.4
 (184.2) (0.6) (183.4)
Reclassifications to net investment and other income, net of tax (13.1) 
 
 (13.1)
Total other comprehensive loss (11.7) (184.2) (0.6) (196.5)
Balance at September 30, 2015 $19.3
 $(327.8) $(5.7) $(314.2)






9394

Table of Contents


Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Not applicable.
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.
The Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of September 30, 20162019. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 20162019 were designed and are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 20162019, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm set forth in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K10‑K are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9B.Other Information.
None.


95


Table of Contents

PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this Item 10 with respect to executive officers of the CompanyFranklin is contained at the end of Part I of this Form 10-K10‑K under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant.“Information About Our Executive Officers.
Code of Ethics. The Company Franklin has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to the CompanyFranklins principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, and any persons performing similar functions, as well as all directors, officers and employees of the CompanyFranklin and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The Code of Ethics is posted on the Company’sour website at www.franklinresources.com under “Corporate Governance.” A copy of the Code of Ethics is available in print free of charge to any stockholder who requests a copy. Interested parties may address a written request for a printed copy of the Code of Ethics to: Secretary, Franklin Resources, Inc., One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906. The Company intendsWe intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethics for the Company’sFranklin’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on itsour website.
The other information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference from the information to be provided under the sections entitledtitled “Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors–Nominees,”Nominees” and “Information about the Board and its Committees–The Audit Committee” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” from the Company’sFranklin’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders (“2017 Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 20162019 (“2020 Proxy Statement”).
Item 11.Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the information to be provided under the sections entitledof our 2020 Proxy Statement titled “Director Fees,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” of the Company’s 2017 Proxy Statement.Compensation.”



94

Table of Contents

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item 12 with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from the information to be provided under the sections entitledof our 2020 Proxy Statement titled “Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” andOwners,” “Stock Ownership and Stock-Based Holdings of Directors Director Nominees and Executive Officers” of the Company’s 2017 Proxy Statement.
and “Executive Compensation–Equity Compensation Plan Information.
The following table sets forth certain information as of September 30, 2016 with respect to the shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Company’s existing compensation plans that have been approved by stockholders and plans that have not been approved by stockholders.
Plan Category 
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
 
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders1
 1,879,437
2 
N/A
3 
28,645,730
4 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders 
 
 
 
Total 1,879,437
 N/A
 28,645,730
 
________________
1
Consists of the 2002 Universal Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “USIP”) and the amended and restated Franklin Resources, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Investment Plan (the “ESIP”). Equity securities granted under the USIP may include awards in connection with the Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2014 Key Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.
2
Represents restricted stock unit awards under the USIP that may be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock. Excludes options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock accruing under the Company’s ESIP. Under the ESIP, each eligible employee is granted a separate option to purchase up to 6,000 shares of common stock each semi-annual accrual period on January 31 and July 31 at a purchase price per share equal to 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the enrollment date or the exercise date, whichever is lower.
3
Does not take into account restricted stock unit awards under the USIP.
4
As of September 30, 2016, 4.4 million shares of common stock were available for future issuance under the ESIP and 24.3 million shares of common stock were available for future issuance under the USIP.
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference from the information to be provided under the sections entitledof our 2020 Proxy Statement titled “Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors-General,Directors–General,” “Corporate Governance–Director Independence Standards” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” of the Company’s 2017 Proxy Statement.Transactions.”
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the information to be provided under the section entitledof our 2020 Proxy Statement titled “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” of the Company’s 2017 Proxy Statement.Firm.”





9596

Table of Contents



PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)(1)The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.10‑K.
(a)(2)No financial statement schedules are required to be filed as part of this report because all such schedules have been omitted. Such omission has been made on the basis that information is provided in the financial statements, or in the related notes thereto, in Item 8 of this Form 10-K10‑K or is not required to be filed as the information is not applicable.
(a)(3)Exhibits.The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index to this Form 10‑K are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 16.Form 10‑K Summary.
None.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
 Description
3(i)(a)3.1

 
3(i)(b)3.2

 
3(i)(c)3.3

 
3(i)(d)3.4

 
3(i)(e)3.5

 
3(ii)3.6

 
4.1

 
4.2

 
4.3

 
4.4

 
4.5

 
4.6
10.1

 
10.2

 


97

Table of Contents

Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 (File No. 001-09318) (the “2014 Annual Report”)*
Description
10.3

 



96

Table of Contents(filed herewith)*

Exhibit No.Description
10.4

 
10.5

 
10.6

 
10.7

 
10.8

 
10.9

 
10.10

 
1210.11

 Computation of Ratios of Earnings
10.12
21

 
23

 
31.1

 
31.2

 
32.1

 
32.2

 
101

 The following materials from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016,2019, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)(iXBRL), include: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related notes (filed herewith)
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in iXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
___________    __________________
*        Management Contractcontract or Compensatory Plancompensatory plan or Arrangementarrangement





9798

Table of Contents


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
  FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
    
Date:November 14, 201612, 2019By:/s/ Kenneth A. Lewis        Matthew Nicholls
   Kenneth A. Lewis,Matthew Nicholls, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
Date:November 12, 2019By:/s/ Gwen L. Shaneyfelt
Gwen L. Shaneyfelt, Chief Accounting Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
 
Date:November 14, 2016By:/s/ Peter K. Barker       
Peter K. Barker, Director
Date:November 14, 2016By:/s/ Mariann Byerwalter   
Mariann Byerwalter, Director
Date:November 14, 2016By:/s/ Charles E. Johnson        
Charles E. Johnson, Director
Date:November 14, 201612, 2019By:/s/ Gregory E. Johnson        
   
Gregory E. Johnson, Chairman, Director and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
    
Date:November 14, 201612, 2019By:/s/ Matthew Nicholls        
Matthew Nicholls, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:November 12, 2019By:/s/ Gwen L. Shaneyfelt
Gwen L. Shaneyfelt, Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date:November 12, 2019By:/s/ Peter K. Barker       
Peter K. Barker, Director
Date:November 12, 2019By:/s/ Mariann Byerwalter   
Mariann Byerwalter, Director
Date:November 12, 2019By:/s/ Charles E. Johnson        
Charles E. Johnson, Director
Date:November 12, 2019By:/s/ Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.        
   Rupert H. Johnson, Jr., Vice Chairman and Director
    
Date:November 14, 2016By:/s/ Kenneth A. Lewis        
Kenneth A. Lewis, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date:November 14, 201612, 2019By:/s/ Mark C. Pigott
   Mark C. Pigott, Director
    
Date:November 14, 201612, 2019By:/s/ Chutta Ratnathicam        
   Chutta Ratnathicam, Director
    
Date:November 14, 201612, 2019By:/s/ Laura Stein        
   Laura Stein, Director
    
Date:November 14, 201612, 2019By:/s/ Seth H. Waugh   
   Seth H. Waugh, Director
    
Date:November 14, 201612, 2019By:/s/ Geoffrey Y. Yang        
   Geoffrey Y. Yang, Director




98

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.Description
3(i)(a)
Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation, as filed November 28, 1969, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(i) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1994 (File No. 001-09318) (the “1994 Annual Report”)
3(i)(b)
Registrant’s Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, as filed March 1, 1985, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to the 1994 Annual Report
3(i)(c)
Registrant’s Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, as filed April 1, 1987, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(iii) to the 1994 Annual Report
3(i)(d)
Registrant’s Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, as filed February 2, 1994, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(iv) to the 1994 Annual Report
3(i)(e)
Registrant’s Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, as filed on February 4, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(i)(e) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 001-09318)
3(ii)
Registrant’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (as adopted and effective September 16, 2015), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 17, 2015 (File No. 001-09318)
4.1
Indenture between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor to Chemical Bank), as trustee, dated as of May 19, 1994, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on April 14, 1994 (File No. 033-53147)
4.2
First Supplemental Indenture, dated October 9, 1996, between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor to The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on October 4, 1996 (File No. 333-12101)
4.3
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated May 20, 2010, between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 20, 2010 (File No. 001-09318)
4.4
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated September 24, 2012, between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 24, 2012 (File No. 001-09318)
4.5
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 30, 2015, between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2015 (File No. 001-09318)
10.1
Representative Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement with directors of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (File No. 001-09318)*
10.2
Representative Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Award and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (RSA) under the Registrant’s 2002 Universal Stock Incentive Plan for certain executive officers of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 (File No. 001-09318) (the “2014 Annual Report”)*
10.3
Representative Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Unit Award and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (RSU) under the Registrant’s 2002 Universal Stock Incentive Plan for long-term performance awards for certain executive officers of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2014 Annual Report*
10.4
2006 Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective March 13, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 001-09318)*
10.5
1998 Employee Stock Investment Plan (as amended and restated February 1, 2012), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2011 (File No. 001-09318)*
10.6
2002 Universal Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective December 15, 2015), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2015 (File No. 001-09318)*
10.7
Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (as amended and restated effective June 14, 2016), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2016 (File No. 001-09318)*




99

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.Description
10.8
2014 Key Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (as adopted and effective December 10, 2013), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2014 (File No. 001-09318)*
10.9
Non-Employee Director Compensation as of September 30, 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 (File No. 001-09318)*
10.10
Named Executive Officer Compensation as of September 30, 2016 (filed herewith)*
12
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith)
21
List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith)
23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith)
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
101
The following materials from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), include: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related notes (filed herewith)
___________    
*        Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement




100