1
                     U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

                                   FORM 10-K

                 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                        THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


     For the fiscal year ended October 31, 19971998 Commission File Number 1-566
 
                              GREIF BROS. CORPORATION
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                        State of Delaware               31-4388903
                (State or other jurisdiction of     (I.R.S. Employer
                 incorporation or organization)     Identification No.)

                 425 Winter Road, Delaware, Ohio                43015
            (Address of principal executive offices)          (Zip Code)

          Registrant's telephone number, including area code 740-549-6000

          Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

                              Title of Each Class
                                      None

          Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

                              Title of Each Class
                             Class "A" Common Stock
                             Class "B" Common Stock

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the 
preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for 
the past 90 days.  Yes __X__.X    No _____. 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the 
best of the registrants knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information 
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any 
amendment to this Form 10-K.  [X][ ]

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the 
Registrant as of January 5, 199812, 1999 was approximately $101,942,807.$90,825,669. 

The number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant's classes of common 
stock, as of January 5, 199812, 1999 was as follows:

                    Class A Common Stock  -  10,902,27210,909,672
                    Class B Common Stock  -  12,001,793

Listed hereunder are the documents, portions of which are incorporated by 
reference, and the parts of this Form 10-K into which such portions are 
incorporated:

1.  The Registrant's Proxy Statement for use in connection with the Annual 
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on February 23, 1998,22, 1999, portions of which are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K, which Proxy 
Statement will be filed within 120 days of October 31, 1997.1998.

 21

PART I

Item 1.    Business

   The Company principally manufactures industrial shipping containers 
and containerboard and related products which it sells to customers in many 
industries, primarily in the United States, Canada and Canada,Mexico, through 
direct sales contact with its customers.  There were no significant changes 
in the business since the beginning of the fiscal year.

   The Company operates 95over 100 locations in 28 states of the United 
States, and 
in 3three provinces of Canada and one state of Mexico and, as such, is 
subject to federal, state, local and foreign regulations in effect at the 
various localities.

   Due to the variety of products, the Company has many customers buying 
different types of the Company's products and, due to the scope of the 
Company's sales, no one customer is considered principal in the total 
operation of the Company.

  	Because the Company supplies a cross section of industries, such as 
chemicals, food products, petroleum products, pharmaceuticals and metal 
products, and other and because the Company must make spot deliveries on a day-to-day 
basis as its product is required by its customers, the Company does not 
operate on a backlog to any significant extent and maintains only limited 
levels of finished goods.  Many customers place their orders weekly for 
delivery during the week.

  	The Company's business is highly competitive in all respects (price, 
quality and service), and the Company experiences substantial competition 
in selling its products.  Many of the Company's competitors are larger than 
the Company.

  	While research and development projects are important to the Company's 
continued growth, the amount expended in any year is not material in 
relation to the results of operations of the Company.

  	The Company's raw materials are principally pulpwood, waste paper for 
recycling, paper, steel and resins.  In the current year, as in prior 
years, certain of these materials have been in short supply, but to date 
these shortages have not had a significant effect on the Company's 
operations.

   The Company's business is not materially dependent upon patents,
trademarks, licenses or franchises.

  	The business of the Company is not seasonal to any significant extent.extent 
and has not recently been significantly affected by inflation.

   The approximate number of persons employed during the year was 4,500.5,150.

 32

Item 1.    Business    (continued)

Industry Segments

	The Company operates(concluded)

Acquisitions and Dispositions

  	A description of significant acquisitions and dispositions is included 
in two industry segments, industrial shipping 
containers and materials (industrial shipping containers) and containerboard 
and related products (containerboard).

	Operations in the industrial shipping containers segment involve the 
production and sale of fibre, steel and plastic drums, multiwall bags, 
cooperage, dunnage, pallets and miscellaneous items.  These products are 
manufactured and principally sold throughout the United States and Canada.

	Operations in the containerboard segment involve the production and 
sale of containerboard, both virgin and recycled, and related corrugated 
products including corrugated sheets and corrugated containers.  The 
products are manufactured and sold in the United States and Canada.

	In computing operating profit for the two industry segments, gain on 
timber sales, interest expense, other income and expense, a restructuring 
charge (see Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), gainsStatements on disposalspages 43-45 of certain facilitiesthis 
Form 10-K, which Note is part of the financial statements contained in Item 
8 of this Form 10-K, and income taxes have notwhich Note is incorporated herein by reference.

  	In January 1999, the Company purchased the assets of the intermediate 
bulk containers business of Sonoco Products Company.  Prior to the 
acquisition, the Company has been allocatedmarketing and selling this product under 
a distributorship agreement that was entered into on March 30, 1998.

Industry Segments

  	Financial information concerning the Company's industry segments as 
required by Item 101(b) is included in Note 11 to such segments.  These amounts, excluding income taxes, comprise general 
corporate other income and expense, net.

	Each segment's operating assets are those assets used in the manufacture and sale of industrial shipping containers or containerboard.  
Corporate assets are principally cash and cash equivalents, timber 
properties, corporate facilities and other.Consolidated 
Financial Statements on pages 55-57 on this Form 10-K, which Note is 
incorporated herein by reference.

 3

	The following segment information is presented for the three years 
ended October 31, 1997, except as to asset information which is as of 
October 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (Dollars in thousands):
1997 1996 1995 Net sales: Industrial shipping containers $396,456 $391,315 $392,505 Containerboard 252,528 246,053 326,840 Total $648,984 $637,368 $719,345 4 Item 1. Business (concluded) 1997 1996 1995 Operating profit: Industrial shipping containers $13,157 $16,736 $ 9,059 Containerboard 10 36,926 80,476 Total segment 13,167 53,662 89,535 General corporate other income and expense, net 16,338 14,034 8,376 Income before income taxes 29,505 67,696 97,911 Income taxes 11,419 24,949 37,778 Net income $18,086 $42,747 $60,133 Identifiable assets: Industrial shipping containers $193,213 $193,378 $190,982 Containerboard 292,140 262,866 220,213 Total segment 485,353 456,244 411,195 Corporate assets 64,736 56,094 56,467 Total $550,089 $512,338 $467,662 Depreciation expense: Industrial shipping containers $13,156 $13,282 $13,114 Containerboard 17,186 12,977 9,765 Total segment 30,342 26,259 22,879 Corporate assets 318 89 65 Total $30,660 $26,348 $22,944 Property additions: Industrial shipping containers $ 3,843 $16,588 $12,540 Containerboard 22,923 56,160 47,593 Total segment 26,766 72,748 60,133 Corporate assets 9,427 1,647 933 Total $36,193 $74,395 $61,066
5 Item 2. Properties The following are the Company's principal locations and products manufactured at such facilities or the use of such facilities. The Company considers its operating properties to be in satisfactory condition and adequate to meet its present needs. However, the Company expects to make further additions, improvements and consolidations of its properties as the Company's business continues to expand.
Location Products Manufactured/Use Industry Segment Alabama: Creola (1) Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Cullman Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Mobile Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Arkansas: Batesville (1)(2) Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers California: Fontana Steel drums Industrial shipping containers LaPalma Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Merced Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Morgan Hill Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Merced Steel drumsSante Fe Springs (3) Warehouse Industrial shipping containers Stockton Corrugated honeycomb Containerboard Connecticut: Windsor Locks (4) Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Colorado: Denver (2)(5) Warehouse Industrial shipping containers Georgia: Dalton (6) Packaging services Industrial shipping containers Lithonia Fibre drums and laminator Industrial shipping containers Macon Corrugated honeycomb Containerboard Marietta (7) General office Industrial shipping containers Tucker Fibre drum Industrial shipping containers 4 Item 2. Properties (continued) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry Segment Illinois: Blue Island Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Centralia Corrugated containers and sheets Containerboard Chicago Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Lockport Plastic drums Industrial shipping containers Lombard (3)(8) General office Industrial shipping containers 6 Item 2. Properties (continued) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry SegmentLombard (9) Research center Industrial shipping containers Naperville (10) Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Northlake Fibre drums and plastic drums Industrial shipping containers Oreana Corrugated containers Containerboard Posen Corrugated honeycomb Industrial shipping containersContainerboard Posen (11) Warehouse Containerboard Quincy (4)(37) Warehouse Containerboard Indiana: Ferdinand (5)(12) Corrugated containers Containerboard Kansas: Kansas City (6) Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Kansas City (7)(13) Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Winfield Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Kentucky: Erlanger (8)(14) Corrugated containers Containerboard Louisville (9)Corrugated sheets Containerboard Louisville (15) Corrugated containers Containerboard Louisville (37) Warehouse Containerboard Mt. Sterling Plastic drums Industrial shipping containers Mt. Sterling (37) Warehouse Industrial shipping containers Winchester Corrugated containers Containerboard Winchester (10) Corrugated containers(16) Warehouse Containerboard Louisiana: St. Gabriel Steel drums and plastic drums Industrial shipping containers Maryland: Sparrows Point Steel drums Industrial shipping containers 5 Item 2. Properties (continued) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry Segment Massachusetts: Mansfield Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Westfield Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers West Springfield (11) General(17) Sales office Industrial shipping containers Worcester Plywood reels Industrial shipping containers 7 Item 2. Properties (continued) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry Segment Michigan: Canton Warehouse Containerboard Grand Rapids Corrugated sheets Containerboard Mason Corrugated sheets Containerboard Roseville Corrugated containers Containerboard Taylor Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Minnesota: Minneapolis Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Rosemount Multiwall bags Industrial shipping containers St. Paul Tight cooperage Industrial shipping containers St. Paul (12)(18) General office Industrial shipping containers Mississippi: Durant Plastic products Industrial shipping containers Jackson (19) General office Missouri: KirkwoodWright City (20) Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Nebraska: Omaha (13)(21) Multiwall bags Industrial shipping containers Omaha Warehouse Industrial shipping containers 6 Item 2. Properties (continued) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry Segment New Jersey: Englishtown (22) Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Rahway Fibre drums and plastic drums Industrial shipping containers Spotswood Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Teterboro Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers New York: Syracuse Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers 8 Item 2. Properties (continued) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry SegmentTonawanda Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers North Carolina: Bladenboro Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Charlotte (23) Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Concord Corrugated sheets Containerboard Ohio: Caldwell Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Canton (14)(37) Corrugated containers Containerboard Cincinnati Corrugated sheets Containerboard Cleveland Corrugated containers Containerboard Columbus (24) General office Industrial shipping containers Columbus (25) General office Delaware Principal office Delaware (15)(26) Research center Industrial shipping containers Fostoria Corrugated containers Containerboard Hebron Plastic drums Industrial shipping containers Massillon Recycled containerboard Containerboard Massillon Corrugated sheets Containerboard Tiffin Corrugated containers Containerboard Westerville (16) General office Industrial shipping containers Youngstown Steel drumsVan Wert Fibre drum Industrial shipping containers Zanesville Corrugated containers and sheets Containerboard 7 Item 2. Properties (continued) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry Segment Pennsylvania: Darlington Fibre drums and plasticHazelton Corrugated honeycomb Containerboard Hazelton (27) Plastic drums Industrial shipping containers Hazelton Corrugated honeycomb Industrial shipping containers Kelton (17) Corrugated honeycomb Industrial shipping containers Reno (37) Corrugated containers Containerboard Stroudsburg Rims and drumDrum hardware Industrial shipping containers Twin Oaks Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Washington Corrugated containers and sheets Containerboard 9 Item 2. Properties (continued) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry SegmentWayne (28) Sales office Industrial shipping containers Tennessee: Kingsport Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Memphis Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Texas: Angleton Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Fort Worth Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers LaPorteHouston (29) Fibre drums, steel drums Industrial shipping containers Houston (30) Plastic drums Industrial shipping containers Houston (31) Sales office Industrial shipping containers LaPorte Steel drums and plastic drums Industrial shipping containers Waco Corrugated honeycomb Industrial shipping containersContainerboard Virginia: AmherstRiverville Containerboard Containerboard Washington: Vancouver (18)(32) Corrugated honeycomb Containerboard Vancouver (33) Warehouse Containerboard West Virginia: Culloden (34) Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers West Virginia: Huntington (19)(35) Corrugated containers and sheets Containerboard Huntington (36) Warehouse Containerboard Wisconsin: Sheboygan Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers 8 Item 2. Properties (continued) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry Segment Canada Alberta: Lloydminster Steel drums, fibre drums Industrial shipping and plastic drums containers Ontario: Belleville Fibre drums and plastic products Industrial shipping containers Bowmanville Spiral tubes Industrial shipping containers Fort Frances Spiral tubes Industrial shipping containers Fruitland Drum hardware and machine shop Industrial shipping containers 10 Item 2. Properties (concluded) Location Products Manufactured /Use Industry Segment Milton Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers Niagara Falls General office Industrial shipping containers Oakville Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Stoney Creek Steel drums Industrial shipping containers Winona Machine shopResearch center and drum hardware Industrial shipping containers Quebec: La Salle Fibre drums and steel drums Industrial shipping containers Maple Grove Pallets Industrial shipping containers Pointe Aux Trembles Fibre drums and spiral tubes Industrial shipping containers Mexico Estado de Mexico: Naucalpan de Juarez Fibre drums Industrial shipping containers
9 Item 2. Properties (concluded) Note: All properties are held in fee except as noted below: Exceptions: (1) Lease expires June 30, 2000 (2) Lease expires August 31, 1999 (2)(3) Lease expires February 28, 1999 (4) Lease expires December 31, 1998 (5) Lease expires December 15, 1998 (3)(6) Lease expires February 28, 1998 (4)September 30, 2002 (7) Lease operates month to month (5)expires April 14, 2001 (8) Lease expires April 30, 1999 (9) Lease expires July 31, 2007 (10) Lease expires June 30, 2000 (11) Lease expires April 30, 1999 (12) Lease expires October 26, 1999 (6)(13) Lease expires March 31, 1999 (14) Lease expires October 6, 2003 (15) Lease expires December 31, 1998 (16) Lease expires December 31, 1998 (17) Lease expires August 31, 1999 (18) Lease expires December 31, 1999 (19) Lease expires August 31, 2001 (20) Lease expires August 31, 2005 (21) Lease expires June 30, 1999 (7)(22) Lease expires March 31, 1999 (8)February 28, 2003 (23) Lease expires October 6,September 30, 2003 (9)(24) Lease expires November 30, 1999 (25) Lease expires August 31, 2001 (26) Lease expires June 30, 2001 (27) Lease expires April 30, 2006 (28) Lease expires December 31, 1998 (10)2000 (29) Lease expires December 31, 2001 (30) Lease expires September 30, 2002 (31) Lease expires June 30, 2001 (32) Lease expires January 31, 2002 (33) Lease expires February 28, 2002 (34) Lease expires January 31, 2002 (35) Lease expires October 7, 2001 (11) Lease expires September 1, 1998 (12) Lease expires December 31, 1999 (13) Lease expires June 30, 1998 (14)(36) Lease expires March 31, 1998 (15) Lease expires June 30, 2001 (16)2000 (37) Lease operates month to month (17) Lease expires April 30, 2003 (18) Lease expires January 31, 2002 (19) Lease expires March 31, 2000 The Company also owns in fee a substantial number of scattered timber tracts comprising approximately 316,000319,000 acres in the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and Virginia and the provinces of Nova Scotia, Ontario and Quebec in Canada. 1110 Item 3. Legal Proceedings The Company has no pending material legal proceedings. From time to time, various legal proceedings arise from eitherat Federal, State or Local levels involving environmental sites to which the Company has shipped, directly or indirectly, small amounts of toxic waste, such as paint solvents, etc. The Company, to date, has been classified as a "de minimis" participant and, as such, has not been subject, in any instance, to material sanctions or sanctions greater than $100,000. In addition, from time to time, but less frequently, the Company has been cited for violations of environmental regulations. Except for the following situation, none of these violations involve or are expected to involve sanctions of $100,000 or more. Currently, the only exposure known to the Company which may exceed $100,000 relates to a pollution situation at its Strother Field plant in Winfield, Kansas. A record of decision issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set forth estimated remedial costs which could expose the Company to approximately $3,000,000 in expense under certain assumptions. If the Company ultimately is required to incur this expense, a significant portion would be paid over 10 years. The Kansas site involves groundwater pollution and certain soil pollution that was found to exist on the Company's property. The estimated costs of the remedy currently preferred by the EPA for the soil pollution on the Company's land represents approximately $2,000,000 of the estimated $3,000,000 in expense. The final remedies have not been selected. In an effort to minimize its exposure for soil pollution, the Company has undertaken further engineering borings and analysis to attempt to identify a more definitive soil area which would require remediation. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in minimizing such exposure, and there can be no assurance that the total expense incurred by the Company in remediating this site will not exceed $3,000,000. A reserve for $2,000,000 was recorded by the Company during fiscal 1995 since it was considered the most likely amount of loss. To date, $360,000$385,000 has been charged against the reserve. The remaining reserve is considered adequate. 1211 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report. Executive Officers of the Company The following information relates to Executive Officers of the Company (elected annually):
Year first became Name Age Positions and Offices Executive Officer Michael J. Gasser 4647 Chairman of the Board 1988 of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Executive and Nominating Committees William B. Sparks, Jr. 5657 Director, President 1995 and Chief Operating Officer, member of the Executive Committee Charles R. Chandler 6263 Director, Vice 1996 Chairman, member of the Executive Committee Joseph W. Reed 6061 Chief Financial 1997 Officer and Secretary Allan Hull 84 Director,Michael L. Roane 43 Vice 1964 President, General Counsel, memberHuman 1998 Resources Lloyd D. Baker 65 President of the Executive Committee Robert C. Macauley 74 Director, Chief 1996 Executive Officer of Virginia Fibre CorporationSoterra, 1975 Incorporated (subsidiary company), Chairman of the Compensation Committee John P. Berg 7778 President Emeritus 1972 Michael M. Bixby 55 Vice President, 1980 Strategic Accounts Ronald L. Brown 51 Vice President, Sales 1996 and Marketing 12 Executive Officers of the Company (continued) Year first became Name Age Positions and Offices Executive Officer Wayne R. Carlberg 55 Vice President, 1998 Marketing John K. Dieker 35 Corporate Controller 1996 Elco Drost 53 President of Greif 1996 Containers Inc. (subsidiary company) Russell A Fazio 55 Vice President, Field 1998 Sales Michael A. Giles 48 Vice President, 1996 Manufacturing, Containerboard Mill Operations C.J. Guilbeau 51 Vice President and 1986 Associate Director of Manufacturing Sharon R. Maxwell 49 Assistant Secretary 1997 Philip R. Metzger 51 Treasurer 1995 Bruce J. Miller 43 Vice President, Sales 1998 and Marketing, Corrugated Products and Services Mark J. Mooney 41 Vice President, 1997 Packaging Services William R. Mordecai 46 Vice President, Sales 1997 and Marketing, Containerboard and Paper Jerome B. Nolder, Jr. 40 Vice President, 1996 Container Operations William R. Shew 68 Special Assistant to 1996 the Vice Chairman 13 Executive Officers of the Company (continued) Year first became Name Age Positions and Offices Executive Officer Lloyd D. Baker 64 President of Soterra, 1975 Incorporated (subsidiary company) Michael M. Bixby 54 Vice President, 1980 Regional Sales Ronald L. Brown 50 Vice President, Sales 1996 and Marketing Dwight L. Dexter 46 Vice President, 1990 Marketing John K. Dieker 34 Corporate Controller 1996 Elco Drost 52 President of Greif 1996 Containers Inc. (subsidiary company) Michael A. Giles 47 Vice President, Mill 1996 Operations C.J. Guilbeau 50 Vice President and 1986 Associate Director of Manufacturing Sharon R. Maxwell 48 Assistant Secretary 1997 Philip R. Metzger 50 Treasurer 1995 Mark J. Mooney 40 Vice President, 1997 National Sales William R. Mordecai 45 Vice President, 1997 Containerboard Sales and Logistics Jerome B. Nolder, Jr. 39 Vice President, 1996 Container Operations William R. Shew 67 Special Assistant to 1996 the Vice Chairman Kent P. Snead 5253 Corporate Director of 1997 Strategic Projects Karl Svendsen 57 Vice President, 1998 Manufacturing
14 Executive Officers of the Company (continued) Except as indicated below, each Executive Officer has served in his present capacity for at least five years. Mr. Michael J. Gasser was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer during 1994. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he served as a Vice President of the Company. Mr. William B. Sparks, Jr. was elected President and Chief Operating Officer during 1995. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Down River International, Inc., a former subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Charles R. Chandler was elected Vice Chairman during 1996. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Virginia Fibre Corporation (now Greif Bros. Corporation of Virginia), a subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Joseph W. Reed was elected Chief Financial Officer and Secretary in 1997. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration - CFO of Pharmacia, Inc. Mr. Michael L. Roane was elected Vice President, Human Resources, in 1998. Prior to that time, and for more than the past five years, Mr. Roane served as Vice President, Human Resources, for Owens and Minor, Inc. Mr. Lloyd D. Baker was elected President of Soterra, Incorporated (subsidiary company) during 1997. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he served as a Vice President of the Company. Mr. John P. Berg was elected President Emeritus in 1996. Prior to that time, he served as President of the Company and General Manager of one of its divisions for more than five years. Mr. Lloyd D. Baker was elected President of Soterra, Incorporated (subsidiary company) during 1997. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he served as a Vice President of the Company. Mr. Michael M. Bixby became Vice President, of Regional SalesStrategic Accounts, during 1997.1998. During the past five years, he has been a Vice President of the Company. 14 Executive Officers of the Company (continued) Mr. Ronald L. Brown became Vice President, of Sales and Marketing, during 1997. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer for Down River International (former subsidiary company). Mr. Wayne R. Carlberg was elected Vice President, Marketing, during 1998. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he held the position of Sales Manager for the Industrial Container Division of Sonoco Products Company, which was acquired on March 31, 1998. Mr. John K. Dieker was elected Corporate Controller in 1995. From 1994Prior to 1995that time, and for more than five years, he served as Assistant Corporate Controller. Prior to that time, he served as Internal Auditor for two years. During 1996, Mr. Elco Drost was elected President of Greif Containers Inc. (subsidiary company) and continues to serve in this capacity. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he served as Vice President for the subsidiary company. 15 Executive OfficersMr. Russell A. Fazio was elected Vice President, Field Sales, during 1998. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he held the position of Manager, Strategic Account Programs, for the Industrial Container Division of Sonoco Products Company, (concluded)which was acquired on March 31, 1998. Mr. Michael A. Giles became Vice President, Manufacturing, Containerboard Mill Operations, in 1997. He was Executive Vice President of Virginia Fibre Corporation (subsidiary(now Greif Bros. Corporation of Virginia, subsidiary company) in 1996. From 1995 to 1996, he served as Vice President of Manufacturing and, prior to that time, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer at the subsidiary company for more than five years. Mr. C.J. Guilbeau became Vice President and Associate Director of Manufacturing during 1997. During the past five years, he has served as Vice President of the Company. Ms. Sharon R. Maxwell was elected Assistant Secretary during 1997. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, she served as administrative assistant to the Chairman. Mr. Philip R. Metzger was elected Treasurer in 1995. Prior to that time, and for more than the past five years, he served as Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Controller. 15 Executive Officers of the Company (concluded) Mr. Bruce J. Miller was elected Vice President, Sales and Marketing, Corrugated Products and Services, during 1998. In 1997 and early 1998, Mr. Miller served as Director, Vendor Management Programs, for the Industrial Shipping Containers segment. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he served as a Vice President of Down River International, Inc. (former subsidiary company). Mr. Mark J. Mooney became Vice President, ofPackaging Services, during 1998. Prior to that time, Mr. Mooney served as Vice President, National Sales, during 1997. From 1993and prior to 1996, and for more than the past five years, he served as the Operations Director, Multiwall Bags, and prior to that time, General Sales and Marketing Manager ofat one of its divisions. Mr. William R. Mordecai became Vice President, Containerboard Sales and Logistics,Marketing, Containerboard and Paper, during 1997. During 1996 to 1997, Mr. Mordecai served as Director, Containerboard Marketing, for Virginia Fibre Corporation (subsidiary(now Greif Bros. Corporation of Virginia, subsidiary company). During 1994Prior to 1996,that time, and for more than five years, he served as President of Pimlico Paper Corporation. Prior to that time, and for more than the past five years, he served as Director, Operations Planning, of MacMillan Bloedel, Inc. Mr. Jerome B. Nolder, Jr. became Vice President, Container Operations, during 1997. Prior to that time, he served as General Manager of one of its divisions since 1994, and prior to that time, he served as Operations Manager for the division for more than five years. Mr. William R. Shew became Special Assistant to the Vice Chairman during 1997. Prior to that time, and for more than the past five years, he served as President of Greif Board Corporation (subsidiary company). Mr. Kent P. Snead became Corporate Director of Strategic Projects during 1997. Prior to that time, and for more than the past five years, he served as the Engineering Manager for Virginia Fibre Corporation (subsidiary company). Mr. Karl Svendsen was elected Vice President, Manufacturing, during 1998. Prior to that time, he served as Vice President, Operating Resources, for the Industrial Container Division of Sonoco Products Company, acquired on March 30, 1998, for more than five years. 16 PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Security Holder Matters The Class A and Class B Common Stock are traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market. Prior to March 1996, the Class A Common Stock was traded on the Chicago Stock Exchange and there was no active market for the Class B Common Stock.
The high and low sales prices for each quarterly period during the last two fiscal years are as follows:
Quarter Ended, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, July 31, Oct. 31, 1997 1997 1997 19971998 1998 1998 1998 Market price Class(Class A Common Stock:Stock): High $35 3/4 $41 1/4 $40 3/4 $40 5/8 Low $32 $35 $35 $27 1/2 Market price (Class B Common Stock): High $40 $44 $43 3/4 $43 Low $33 1/2 $37 1/2 $40 3/4 $34 Quarter Ended, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, July 31, Oct. 31, 1997 1997 1997 1997 Market price (Class A Common Stock): High $31 $31 1/4 $31 1/4 $36 1/2 Low $27 $25 $23 3/4 $30 ClassMarket price (Class B Common Stock:Stock): High $35 $35 $33 $37 1/4 Low $30 $28 1/4 $26 3/4 $31 1/4 Quarter Ended, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, July 31, Oct. 31, 1996 1996 1996 1996 Market price Class A Common Stock: High $28 7/8 $32 $33 $31 1/2 Low $24 1/4 $26 1/4 $26 $27 3/4 Class B Common Stock: High N/A $35 1/2 $36 1/2 $36 Low N/A $27 1/2 $26 3/4 $31 1/24
As of December 1, 1997,18, 1998, there were 790747 shareholders of record of the Class A Common Stock and 179181 shareholders of record of the Class B Common Stock. 17 Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Security Holder Matters (concluded) The Company paid five dividends of varying amounts during its fiscal year computed on the basis described in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 3648 of this Form 10-K, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The annual dividends paid for the last three fiscal years are as follows: 1998 fiscal year dividends per share - Class A $.48; Class B $.71 1997 fiscal year dividends per share - Class A $.60; Class B $.89 1996 fiscal year dividends per share - Class A $.48; Class B $.71 1995 fiscal year dividends per share - Class A $.40; Class B $.59 1817 Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The 5-year selected financial data is as follows (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
YEARS ENDED OCTOBERYears Ended October 31, 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 Net sales $801,131 $648,984 $637,368 $719,345 $583,526 $526,765 Net income $ 33,104 $ 18,086 $ 42,747 $ 60,133 $ 33,754 $ 24,609 Total assets $829,363 $550,089 $512,338 $467,662 $419,074 $381,183 Long termLong-term obligations $235,000 $ 52,152 $ 25,203 $ 14,365 $ 28,215 $ 28,390 Dividends per share: Class A Common Stock $.60 $.48 $.40 $.30 $.30$ .48 $ .60 $ .48 $ .40 $ .30 Class B Common Stock $.89 $.71 $.59 $.44 $.44 Net income$ .71 $ .89 $ .71 $ .59 $ .44 Basic and diluted earnings per share: Based on the assumption that earnings were allocated to Class A andCommon Stock $ 1.15 $ .63 $ 1.48 $ 1.96 $ 1.10 Class B Common Stock to the extent that dividends were actually paid for the year and the remainder were allocated as they would be received by shareholders in the event of liquidation, that is, equally to Class A and Class B shares, share and share alike: 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 Class A Common Stock $.64 $1.75 $2.39 $1.32 $.94 Class B Common Stock $.93 $1.98 $2.58 $1.46 $1.08 Due to the special characteristics of the Company's two classes of stock (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), earnings per share can be calculated upon the basis of varying assumptions, none of which, in the opinion of management, would be free from the claim that it fails fully and accurately to represent the true interest of the shareholders of each class of stock and in the retained earnings.$ 1.71 $ .94 $ 2.22 $ 2.93 $ 1.64
Current year amounts include the results of operations and assets of the industrial containers business of Sonoco Products Company acquired on March 30, 1998. The increase in long-term obligations is a result of this acquisition. The results of operations include the effects of pretax restructuring charges of $27.5 million and $6.2 million for 1998 and 1997, respectively. Prior year earnings per share have been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 128 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). 1918 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations FINANCIAL DATA Presented below are certain comparative data illustrative of the following discussionsdiscussion of the Company's results of operations, financial condition and changes in financial condition (Dollars in thousands):
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 Net sales: Industrial shipping containers $396,456 $391,315 $392,505 $353,992Shipping Containers $444,130 $333,005 $322,330 Containerboard 252,528 246,053 326,840 229,534357,001 315,979 315,038 Total $801,131 $648,984 $637,368 $719,345 $583,526 Operating profit: Industrial shipping containers $13,157 $16,736Shipping Containers $ 9,05926,928 $ 9,57310,687 $ 13,533 Containerboard 10 36,926 80,476 30,30640,972 2,480 40,129 Total $13,167 $53,662 $89,535 $39,879$ 67,900 $ 13,167 $ 53,662 Net income $18,086 $42,747 $60,133 $33,754$ 33,104 $ 18,086 $ 42,747 Current ratio 2.6:1 2.9:1 3.7:1 4.0:1 4.4:1 Cash flowflows from operations $40,115 $81,906 $85,820 $48,049 (Decrease) increase$ 76,862 $ 40,115 $ 81,906 Increase (decrease) in working capital $ 46,001 $(22,257) $(13,973) $ 3,342 $ 7,202 Capital expenditures $36,193 $74,395 $61,066 $40,682$ 38,093 $ 36,193 $ 74,395 Acquisitions $185,395 $ 41,724 $ 9,275
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS NetThe Company had net income, decreased $24,661,000excluding the effect of a $27.5 million restructuring charge, of $49.4 million, or 58%$1.71 and $2.56 per share for the Class A and Class B Common Stock, respectively, compared to net income, excluding the effect of a $6.2 million restructuring charge, of $21.9 million, or $.76 and $1.13 per share for the Class A and Class B Common Stock, respectively, last year. Including the effect of the restructuring charge, the Company reported net income of $33.1 million, or $1.15 and $1.71 per share for the Class A and Class B Common Stock, respectively, for 1998. Prior year net income, inclusive of the effect of that year's restructuring charge, was $18.1 million, or $.63 and $.94 per share for the Class A and Class B Common Stock, respectively. 19 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) The increase in net income, excluding the effect of the restructuring charges, was due primarily to improved operating profits for the Containerboard segment resulting from higher average paper prices over the prior year. The reduction is primarily dueIn addition, the acquisition of the industrial containers business of Sonoco and several timberland sales contributed to the lower operating profit for the containerboard segment caused by lower sales prices without a corresponding decreaseimprovement in the cost of products sold and selling, general and administrative expenses for the segment. The lower sales prices were a result of the continued weakness in paper prices which related to excess capacity in the containerboard market during 1997. These negative price trends, which started at the end of 1995, reached a 19-year low in May 1997. In the last several months of 1997, sales prices in the containerboard segment have begun to increase.net income. Historically, revenues or earnings may or may not be representativeindicative of future operations because of various economic factors. As explained below, the Company is subject to the general economic conditions of its customers and the industry in which it operates. The Company's Industrial Shipping Containers segment, where packages manufactured by the Company are purchased by other manufacturers and suppliers, is substantially subject to the general economic conditions and business success of the Company's customers. Similarly, the Company's Containerboard segment is subject to the general economic conditions and the effect of the operating rates of the containerboard industry, including pricing pressures from its competitors. The Company remains confident that, with the financial strength that it has built over its 121-year existence, it will be able to effectively compete in its highly competitive markets. Net Sales Net sales increased $152.1 million or 23.4% during the current year as compared to the previous year. The net sales of the Industrial Shipping Containers segment increased by $111.1 million or 33.4% in comparison to the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of the acquisition of the industrial containers business of Sonoco which contributed $123.5 million of net sales during 1998. The net sales of the Containerboard segment increased by $41.0 million or 13.0% in comparison to the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of a $35.9 million increase in net sales from the Company's paper mills which was attributed primarily to the improved sales prices of its products. The higher sales prices were caused by the overall improvement of the containerboard market. In addition, the purchase of Independent Container, Inc. and Centralia Container, Inc. in May 1997 and June 1997, respectively, contributed $24.0 million in additional net sales as a result of higher sales volume. In August 1997, the Company disposed of its wood components plants in Kentucky, California, Washington and Oregon with prior year net sales of $37.0 million. 20 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) The Company remains confident that, with the financial strength that it has built over its 120-year existence, it will be able to compete in its highly competitive markets. Net Sales The containerboardIndustrial Shipping Containers segment had an increase in net sales of $6.5$10.7 million or 2.6%3.3% in 1997 as compared to 1996. The increase was due primarily to the purchase of two steel drum operations located in Merced, California and Oakville, Ontario, Canada in 1997 which contributed $19.1 million in sales during 1997. As mentioned above, excessThe increase that resulted from this acquisition was partially offset by the disposal of one of the Company's injection molding facilities located in Ohio during February 1997. Net sales for the location sold amounted to $3.6 million in 1997 and $12.3 million in 1996. The location was sold since it was determined that it no longer met the strategic objectives of the Company. The Containerboard segment had a slight increase in net sales in 1997 as compared to 1996. Excess capacity in the containerboard market caused sales prices for containerboard and related products to be lower. In fact, paper prices reached a 19-year low in May 1997. This reduction in sales prices at ourfrom the Company's paper mills was partially offset by an increase in sales volume this yearin 1997 as compared to last1996. In addition, the sale of the wood components plants caused a decrease in sales since the prior year. In addition,Net sales for these locations amounted to $37.0 million in 1997 and $42.5 million in 1996. Furthermore, the Company completed three acquisitions of corrugated container companies: Aero Box Company located in Roseville, Michigan; Independent Container, Inc. with locations in Louisville and Erlanger, Kentucky and Ferdinand, Indiana; and Centralia Container, Inc. located in Centralia, Illinois. These acquisitions, along withas well as the two acquisitions from the prior year, contributed $48.7 million of net sales during 1997, and contributed to the further integration of the businesses.1997. In the prior year, there were $7.3 million of net sales relating to the 1996 acquisitions. The industrial shipping containers segment had an increase in net sales of $5.1 million or 1.3% in 1997. The increase is primarily due to the purchase of two steel drum operations located in Merced, California and Oakville, Ontario, Canada in the current year which contributed $19.1 million in sales during 1997. The increase that resulted from this acquisition was partially offset by the disposal of the Company's wood components plants in Kentucky, California, Washington and Oregon, at the beginning of August 1997 and one of its injection molding facilities located in Ohio during February 1997. Net sales for the locations which were sold amounted to $38 million in 1997 and $46.2 million in 1996. These locations were sold since it was determined that they no longer met the strategic objectives of the Company. The containerboard segment had a decrease in net sales of $81 million in 1996. The reduction in net sales was primarily caused by lower selling prices due to weaknesses in the containerboard market during 1996. This decrease was partially offset by a sales volume increase in 1996. During 1996, the Company purchased two corrugated container companies with locations in Illinois, West Virginia and Kentucky. In addition, a subsidiary of the Company began operations at a new plant in Mason, Michigan. 21 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) Net sales in the industrial shipping containers segment remained about the same in 1996 as in the previous year. There was a decrease in net sales due to the closing of two drum plants at the end of 1995. The closings resulted from management's determination that they would not provide a reasonable return to the Company. The reduction in net sales was offset by a net increase in sales at the other locations of this segment primarily due to more sales volume. The containerboard segment had an increase in net sales of $97 million in 1995 which was primarily due to higher sales prices. The increase in sales prices resulted from shortages in the containerboard and related products industry. In addition, there was a less significant increase in unit sales of the segment because of the inclusion of an entire year of sales in 1995 for the 325 ton per day recycled paper machine at a subsidiary of the Company which was completed in December 1993. The industrial shipping containers segment had an increase in net sales of $39 million in 1995 resulting from more volume. In addition, there were some sales price increases that were made because of the increase in the cost of the Company's raw materials. Operating Profit During 1997,1998, the decreaseincrease in operating profit of $40.5$54.7 million iswas due primarily due to a loweran improvement in gross profit margin of 13.1%19.5% this year compared to 19.1%13.4% last year. This reductionincrease was caused by lowerhigher sales prices per unit in the containerboardContainerboard segment without a corresponding reductionincrease in the cost of products sold. In addition, the inclusion of the industrial containers business of Sonoco contributed to this increase. The increase in gross profit was partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses included in both segments increased over the prior year partially due to additionalyear. The higher selling, general and administrative costs being included from the Company's recent acquisitions. The operating profit of the containerboard segment is insignificant in 1997 comparedexpenses were due primarily to $37 million or 15.0% of net sales in 1996 and $80 million or 24.6% of net sales in 1995. The decrease in 1996, and continued decrease in 1997 is dueadditional expenses related to the reduction in sales prices resulting in less favorable gross profit margins. The increase in 1995 is due to increases in net salesindustrial containers business of Sonoco, prior year acquisitions and more favorable gross profit margins.amortization of goodwill. 2221 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) The operating profit of the industrial shipping containersIndustrial Shipping Containers segment is $13.2was $10.7 million or 3.3%3.2% of net sales in 1997 as compared to $17$13.5 million or 4.3%4.2% of net sales in 1996 and $9 million or 2.3% of net sales in 1995. The1996. Price pressures on its products affected the operating profits of this segment have been affected by severe price pressures on its products. However, due to the Company's ongoing efforts to reduce operating costs through cost control measures, manufacturing innovations and capital expenditures, the operating profits increased from 1994 to 1996.segment. During 1997, the Company experienced lower profitability due to higher cost of raw materials without a corresponding increase in sales prices. The operating profit of the Containerboard segment was $2.5 million or 0.8% of net sales in 1997 as compared to $40.1 million or 12.7% of net sales in 1996. The decrease in 1997 is due to the reduction in sales prices resulting in less favorable gross profit margins. Restructuring ChargeCosts During the third quarter of 1998, the Company approved a plan to consolidate some of its locations in order to improve operating efficiencies and capabilities. The plan was a result of a study to determine whether certain locations, either existing or newly acquired, should be closed or relocated to a different facility. As a result of this plan, the Company recognized a restructuring charge of $27.5 million in connection with eighteen of the Company's existing plants that will be closed during 1998 and 1999. These plants were not part of the industrial containers business of the Sonoco acquisition. The charge relates to $20.9 million in employee separation costs (approximately 500 employees) and $6.6 million in other anticipated costs of closing and disposing of the facilities. As of October 31, 1998, the Company has paid approximately $2.7 million consisting primarily of severance payments. The Company expects the remaining liability of $24.8 million to be expended during 1999. In connection with the consolidation plan, an additional five locations purchased as part of the industrial containers business of Sonoco will be closed. Accordingly, the Company recorded a $9.5 million restructuring liability related to these locations. The liability consisted of $6.1 million in employee separation costs (approximately 100 employees) and $3.4 million in other anticipated closing and disposition costs. As of October 31, 1998, the Company has paid approximately $1.9 million consisting primarily of severance payments. The Company believes the remaining liability of $7.6 million will be expended during 1999. The Company's management believes that, upon completion of the consolidation, positive contributions to earnings on an annualized basis from these actions could approximate an amount equal to the third quarter restructuring charge as a result of reductions in labor costs and an improvement in operating efficiencies. These contributions are expected to begin in the latter part of 1998; however, the most significant impact will not be realized until the end of 1999 after the plan has been fully implemented. 22 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) During 1997, the Company adopted a plan to consolidate its operations which included the relocation of certain key operating employees, the realignment of some of its administrative functions and the reduction of certain support functions. As a result, there was a charge to income of $6.2 million during the fourth quarter.quarter of 1997. As of October 31, 1998, all expenditures related to the charge have been made and the liability accordingly eliminated. Other Income Other income increased $3.4 million in 1998 from the prior year due primarily to $8.9 million of additional sales of timber and timber properties. The Company analyzes market factors as well as the condition of its timberlands in order to maximize the gain on its timber sales. In the prior year, there were $3.7 million of gains on the sale of an injection molding facility and wood components plants. In 1997, other income increased $10.8 million from the prior year due to $3$3.0 million of additional sales of timber properties. Also, the Company sold its wood components plants and one of its injection molding facilities during the year which resulted in $3.7 million of gains on the sale of capital assets. Other incomeInterest Expense In 1998, interest expense increased $9.3 million from the prior year due to increased debt relating to the acquisition of the Company increased in 1996 due to the saleindustrial containers business of timber properties in the United States and in Canada.Sonoco. In 1995, other income increased primarily due to the sale of timber properties under threat of acquisition by eminent domain and more salvage timber sales. The increase in volume of timber sales was accompanied by higher timber prices. Interest Expense Interest1997, interest expense increased $2.2 million from the prior year as a result of additional debt issued in 1997 and 1996 relating to the acquisitions ofby the Company and certain capital improvements. Income Before Income Taxes Income before income taxes increased $26.1 million in 1998 as compared to the prior year primarily due to more favorable gross profit margins experienced by the Containerboard segment than in 1997. In addition, the industrial containers business of Sonoco contributed $12.9 million and there were $8.9 million of gains on the sale of timber and timberlands. These increases were significantly offset by a $27.5 million restructuring charge in 1998 as compared to a $6.2 million restructuring charge in 1997 and $9.3 million of additional interest expense. 23 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) Income Before Income Taxes Income before income taxes decreased $38.2 million in 1997 as compared to the prior year due primarily due to less favorable gross profit margins in the Containerboard segment than in the prior year.1996. In addition, there was a $6.2 million restructuring charge related to the restructuring and a $2.2 million increase in interest expense. These reductions were offset by the $3The $3.0 million of higher timber sales and $3.7 million of gains on the sale of certain facilities which no longer fit the business strategy of the Company.offset these reductions. Income before income taxes decreased by $30.2 million in 1996 dueTaxes The Company anticipates that it will be able to lower sales and less favorable gross profit margins than in the prior year. These reductions were offset by a $1.6 million increase in gains from timber sales as compared to 1995. In 1995, income before income taxes increased because of higher sales and more favorable gross profit margins. In addition, as discussed above, there was an increase in the sale of timber and timber properties.fully realize its recognized deferred tax assets based upon its projected taxable income. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES As indicated in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, elsewhere in this Reportreport and in the financial data set forth above, the Company is dedicated to maintaining a strong financial position. It is ourmanagement's belief that this dedication is extremely important during all economic times. The Company's financial strength is important to continue to achieve the following goals: a. To protect the assets of the Company and the intrinsic value of shareholders' equity in periods of adverse economic conditions. b. To respond to any large and presently unanticipated cash demands that might result from future adverse events. c. To be able to benefit from new developments, new products and new opportunities in order to achieve the best results for our shareholders. d. To continue to pay competitive remuneration, including the ever-increasingever- increasing costs of employee benefits, to Company employees who produce the results for the Company's shareholders. 24 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) e. To replace and improve plants and equipment. When plants and production machinery must be replaced, either because of wear or to obtain the cost- reducingcost-reducing potential of technological improvement required to remain a low- costlow-cost producer in the highly competitive environment in which the Company operates, the cost of new plants and machinery are often significantly higher than the historical cost of the items being replaced. The 24 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) During 1998, the Company during 1997, invested approximately $36$38 million in capital additions and $42$185 million for its acquisitions. During the last three years, the Company has invested $223$385 million in capital additions and acquisitions. During 1997, the Company purchased three corrugated container companies, Aero Box Company, Independent Container, Inc. and Centralia Container, Inc. In addition, the Company purchased two steel drum operations. Furthermore, one of the paper mills added a power plant to its operations and a corrugated carton plant had a major addition to its facility which included more machinery and equipment. As discussed in the 1996 Annual Report, Virginia Fibre Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company, made significant improvements to its facilities by adding a new woodyard and a manufacturing control system. Greif Board Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company, made significant improvements to its machinery and equipment. In addition, Michigan Packaging Company, a subsidiary of the Company, built a new manufacturing plant in Mason, Michigan that was completed in November 1995. The Company purchased two corrugated container companies, Decatur Container Corporation and Kyowva Corrugated Container Company, Inc. in 1996. While there is no commitment to continue such a practice, at least one new manufacturing plant or a major addition to an existing plant has been undertaken in each of the last three years. On December 10, 1997, the Company signed a non-binding letter of intent to acquire all of the outstanding shares of KMI Continental Fibre Drum, Inc., Fibro Tambor, S.A. de C.V., Sonoco Plastic Drum, Inc. from Sonoco Products and their interest in Total Packaging Systems of Georgia, LLC for approximately $225 million in cash. The acquisition is subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence by the Company and receipt of all required governmental approvals. In addition, the Company has approved future purchases, primarily for equipment, of approximately $7 million. 25 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (concluded) Self-financing and borrowing have been the primary sources for past capital expenditures and acquisitions. The Company will attempt to finance future capital expenditures and acquisitions in a like manner. Long term obligations are higher at October 31, 1997 compared to October 31, 1996 due to additional long term debt related to its acquisitions and capital improvements. The increase caused by this debt was partially offset by the payment of long term debt during 1997. These investments are an indication of the Company's commitment to be the quality, low-cost producer and the desirable long termlong-term supplier to all of our customers. Management believes that the present financial strength of the Company will be sufficient to achieve these goals. On March 30, 1998, the foregoing goals.Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of the industrial containers business of Sonoco for approximately $185 million in cash. The industrial containers business includes twelve fibre drum plants and five plastic drum plants along with facilities for research and development, packaging services and distribution. In spiteaddition, the Company entered into an agreement with Sonoco to acquire its intermediate bulk containers business, which the parties intend to finalize as soon as necessary approvals are obtained. Pending receipt of such approvals, the Company markets and sells intermediate bulk containers for Sonoco under a distributorship agreement. During 1997, the Company purchased three corrugated container companies: Aero Box Company, Independent Container, Inc. and Centralia Container, Inc. In addition, the Company purchased two steel drum operations. Furthermore, the paper mill in Ohio added a power plant to its operations and a corrugated carton plant increased its capacity with new machinery and equipment. As discussed in prior annual reports, the Company's paper mill in Virginia made significant improvements to its facilities by adding a new woodyard and a manufacturing control system. The Company's paper mill in Ohio made significant improvements to its machinery and equipment. In addition, a new sheet feeder plant in Michigan was completed during November 1995. The Company purchased two corrugated container companies, Decatur Container Corporation and Kyowva Corrugated Container Company, Inc. during 1996. The purchase of the industrial containers business of Sonoco has been the primary reason for the increase in accounts receivable, inventories, goodwill, property, plant and equipment and accounts payable since October 31, 1997. 25 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) The increase in the restructuring reserve is primarily due to the recording of a restructuring charge of $27.5 million, as discussed above, during the third quarter of 1998. The remaining increase is due to a restructuring reserve that was set up for certain Sonoco locations, purchased on March 30, 1998, that will be closed. These amounts primarily relate to severance arrangements and other costs of closing the plants. During 1998, the Company entered into a credit agreement which provides for a revolving credit facility of up to $325 million. The Company has borrowed money under the credit facility to purchase the industrial containers business of Sonoco and repay the other long-term obligations of the Company. The credit agreement contains certain covenants including maintaining a certain leverage ratio, sufficient coverage of interest expense and a minimum net worth. In addition, the Company is limited with respect to additional debt. Finally, there are certain non-financial covenants including sales of assets, financial reporting, mergers and acquisitions, investments, change in control and Employee Retirement Income Security Act compliance. The increase in other long-term liabilities is primarily the result of the postretirement health care benefits related to certain employees of the acquired businesses of Sonoco. Various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against the Company, including those pertaining to environmental, product liability, safety and health matters. While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the ultimate liability cannot now be determined because of the considerable uncertainties that exist. Therefore, it is possible that results of operations or liquidity in a particular period could be materially affected by certain contingencies. However, based upon the facts currently available, management believes that the disposition of matters that are pending or asserted will not have a materially adverse affect on the financial position of the Company. During 1997, the Company embarked on a program to implement a new management information system. The purpose of the new management information system is to focus on using information technology to link operations in order to become a low-cost producer and more effectively service the Company's customers. The ultimate cost of this project is dependent upon management's final determination of the locations, timing and extent of integration of the new management information system. As of October 31, 1998, the Company has spent approximately $12.5 million towards this project. 26 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) In addition to the intermediate bulk containers business of Sonoco and the new management information system, as described above, the Company has approved future purchases of approximately $46.5 million. These purchases are primarily to replace and improve equipment. Borrowing and self-financing have been the primary sources for past capital expenditures and acquisitions. The Company anticipates financing future capital expenditures in a like manner and believes that it will have adequate funds available for planned expenditures. On November 1, 1998, a joint venture named CorrChoice was formed to operate the sheet feeder plants of Michigan Packaging, a subsidiary of the Company, and Ohio Packaging. The joint venture was formed by the stockholders of Michigan Packaging and Ohio Packaging contributing their stock in these companies to CorrChoice in exchange for stock of CorrChoice. The Company was not required to commit any additional capital resources to fund the joint venture. The joint venture is expected to be self- supporting. During December 1998, the Company and Abzac, a privately held company in France, entered into a letter of intent for the exchange of the Company's spiral core manufacturing assets for a 49% equity interest in Abzac's fibre drum business. The Company manufactures spiral cores at three of its Canadian locations. Abzac manufacturers fibre drums at three of its locations in France. The transaction is subject to due diligence and is anticipated to be completed during the third quarter of 1999. YEAR 2000 MATTERS Historically, certain information technology ("IT") systems of the Company have used two digits rather than four digits to define that applicable year, which could result in recognizing a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. IT systems include computer software and hardware in the mainframe, midrange and desktop environments as well as telecommunications. Additionally, the impact of the problem extends to non-IT systems, such as automated plant systems and instrumentation. The Year 2000 issues could result in major failures or misclassifications. 27 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) The Company is actively assessing the Year 2000 readiness of its IT and non-IT systems, and has begun to remediate certain IT systems. In addition, the Company is in the process of determining the extent to which the systems of third parties with whom the Company has significant relationships may be vulnerable to Year 2000 issues and what impact, if any, these Year 2000 issues will have on the Company. As part of these assessments, a compliance plan, which includes the formation of a steering committee and a timetable for identifying, evaluating, resolving and testing its Year 2000 issues, has been developed. The steering committee includes members of the Company's senior management and internal audit department to ensure that the issues are adequately addressed and completed in a timely manner. The timetable provides for the Company's completion of its remediation of any Year 2000 issues by the end of 1999. According to the compliance plan, the inventory and assessment phase related to the Company's IT and non-IT systems are expected to be complete by the end of the second quarter of 1999. Further, corrections and testing of critical Year 2000 issues are expected to be complete by the end of the third quarter of 1999. For non- critical Year 2000 issues, corrections and testing are expected to be complete by the end of the fourth quarter of 1999. While it is difficult, at present, to fully quantify the overall cost of this work, the Company currently estimates its total spending for Year 2000 remediation efforts to be approximately $6 million to $10 million. The range is a function of ongoing evaluation as to whether certain systems and equipment will be corrected or replaced, which is largely dependent on information to be obtained from suppliers or other external sources. This amount will primarily be expended during 1999. Costs for system maintenance and modification are expensed as incurred while spending for new hardware, software or equipment will be capitalized and depreciated over the assets' useful lives. The Company anticipates funding its Year 2000 expenditures out of its cash flows from operations. As of October 31, 1998, approximately $400,000 has been spent related to this effort. The Company anticipates timely completion of its Year 2000 remediation. However, if the Company does not become Year 2000 compliant on a timely basis, there could be adverse financial and operational effects on the Company. The amount of these effects can not be ascertained at this time. The Year 2000 steering committee is continuously reviewing the status of the Company's remediation efforts and, as a necessary part of the compliance plan discussed above, a contingency plan will be created during 1999. The plan will address alternative solutions to the Company's Year 2000 issues. 28 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS During 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", which is effective in 1999 for the Company. Currently, the only item in addition to net income that would be included in comprehensive income is the cumulative translation adjustment. During 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", which is effective in 1999 for the Company. The impact on the presentation of the Company's segments has not yet been determined. In February 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132, "Employer's Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits - an amendment to FASB Statements No. 87, No. 88 and No. 106", which is effective in 1999 for the Company. SFAS No. 132 will not affect the Company's results of operations, however, the impact on the presentation of the Company's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements has not been determined. In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", which is effective in 2000 for the Company. The Company has not determined what impact SFAS No. 133 will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS; CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE RESULTS Statements contained in this Form 10-K or any other reports or documents prepared by the Company or made by management of the Company may be "forward-looking" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company's operating results to differ materially from those projected. The following factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in the future could affect the Company's actual financial strength,performance. Changes in General Economic Conditions. The Company's customers generally consist of other manufacturers and suppliers who purchase the Company's industrial shipping containers business, where packages manufactured by Greif Bros. Corporation are purchased by other manufacturers and suppliers,containerboard for their own containment and shipping purposes. Because the Company supplies a cross section of many industries, such as chemicals, food products, petroleum products, pharmaceuticals, and metal products, demand for the Company's industrial shipping containers and containerboard and related corrugated products has historically corresponded to changes in general economic conditions of the United States, Canada and Mexico. Accordingly, the Company's financial performance is wholly subject tosubstantially dependent upon the general economic conditions existing in the United States, Canada and Mexico. 29 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued) Competition. The Company's business successof manufacturing and selling industrial shipping containers and containerboard is highly competitive. The most important competitive factors are price, quality and service. Many of the Company's customers. Similarly,competitors are substantially larger and have significantly greater financial resources. Excess Capacity in Containerboard Segment. Industry demand for containerboard products has declined in recent years causing excess capacity in this segment of the Company's containerboard and related products business is subject to the general economic conditions and the effect of the operating rates ofbusiness. This excess capacity has in turn caused lower sales prices in the containerboard industry, includingmarket, evidenced by paper prices reaching a 19-year low in May 1997. These excess capacity levels and competitive pricing pressures fromin the containerboard market have negatively impacted the Company's financial performance in recent years. Management does not anticipate that paper prices will be as favorable in 1999 as in 1998, which could negatively impact the Company's net sales and operating profits. Raw Material Shortages. The Company's raw materials are principally pulpwood, waste paper for recycling, paper, steel and resins. Certain of these materials have been, and in the future may be, in short supply. Shortages in raw materials could adversely affect the Company's operations. Failure of Year 2000 Compliance. The Company is actively assessing its competitors.Year 2000 readiness, including the extent to which third parties with whom the Company has significant relationships may be vulnerable to Year 2000 issues and what impact, if any, these Year 2000 issues will have on the Company. As part of these assessments, a compliance plan, which includes the formation of a steering committee and a timetable for identifying, evaluating, resolving and testing its Year 2000 issues, has been developed. The historical financial strength generatedCompany anticipates timely completion of its Year 2000 remediation by these segments has enabled themthe end of 1999. However, the failure to remain independently liquid duringbecome Year 2000 compliant on a timely basis could have a material adverse economic conditions. SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this Annual Report contain certain forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, economic, competitive, governmental and technological factors affectingaffect on the Company's operations markets, services and related products, pricesfinancial performance. The Year 2000 steering committee is continuously reviewing the status of the Company's remediation efforts and, as a necessary part of the compliance plan discussed above, a contingency plan will be created during 1999 to address alternative solutions to the Company's Year 2000 issues. 30 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (concluded) Environmental and Health and Safety Matters; Product Liability Claims. The Company must comply with extensive rules and regulations regarding federal, state and local environmental matters, such as air and water quality and waste disposal. The Company must also comply with extensive rules and regulations regarding safety and health matters. The failure to materially comply with such rules and regulations could adversely affect the Company's operations. Furthermore, litigation or claims against the Company with respect to such matters could adversely affect the Company's financial performance. The Company may also become subject to product liability claims which could adversely affect the Company. Risks Associated with Acquisitions. During the past several years the Company has invested, and for the foreseeable future the Company anticipates investing, a substantial amount of capital in acquisitions. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the failure to retain key employees and contracts and the inability to integrate businesses without material disruption. In addition, other factors discussedcompanies in the Company's filings withindustries have similar acquisition strategies. There can be no assurance that any future acquisitions will be successfully integrated into the SecuritiesCompany's operations, that competition for acquisitions will not intensify or that the Company will be able to complete such acquisitions on acceptable terms and Exchange Commission.conditions. In addition, the costs of unsuccessful acquisition efforts may adversely affect the Company's financial performance. Timberland Sales. The Company has a significant inventory of standing timber and timberlands. The frequency and volume of sales of timber and timberland will have an effect on the Company's actual results could differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements.financial performance. 31 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Not applicableInterest Rate Risk: The Company is subject to interest rate risk related to its financial instruments which include borrowings under its $325 million revolving credit facility and interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $160 million. The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The interest rate swap agreements have been entered into to manage the Company's exposure to its variable rate borrowing. The table below provides information about the Company's derivative financial instruments and other financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For the revolving credit facility, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by contractual maturity dates. For interest rate swaps, the table presents annual amortization of notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by contractual maturity dates. Under the swap agreements, the Company receives interest quarterly from the counterparty and pays interest quarterly to the counterparty. The fair value of the revolving credit facility is based on current rates available to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturity. The fair values of the interest rate swap agreements have been determined by the counterparty. Financial Instruments (Dollars in millions)
Expected Maturity Date There- Fair 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 after Total Value Liabilities Revolving credit facility: Variable rate $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $235 (a) $ -- $ 235 $ 235 Average interest rate 5.50%(b) Interest rate derivatives Interest rate swaps: Variable to fixed rates $ 10 $ 20 $ 30 $ 10 $ 20 $ 70 $160 $ (7) Average pay rate 6.15% 6.15% 5.53% 6.15% 6.15% 6.15% 6.03% Average receive rate (c) 5.22% 5.22% 5.22% 5.22% 5.22% 5.22% 5.22% (a) Includes $235 million of borrowings under the $325 million unsecured revolving credit facility which expires in 2003. The Company has the option under the credit facility to repay borrowings prior to 2003 or to request an extension. (b) Variable rate specified is based on the prime rate or LIBOR rate plus a calculated margin at October 31, 1998. Interest is paid and reset quarterly.
32 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (concluded) [FN] (c) The average receive rate is based upon the LIBOR rate at this timeOctober 31,1998. The rates presented are not intended to project the Company's expectations for the future. Foreign Currency Risk: The Company's exposure to foreign currency fluctuations on its financial instruments is not material because most of these instruments are denominated in U.S. dollars. The net sales and total assets of the Company which are denominated in foreign currencies (i.e., Canadian dollars and Mexican pesos) represent less than 10% of the consolidated net sales and total assets. Commodity Price Risk: The Company has no financial instruments subject to commodity price risks. 2633 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data GREIF BROS. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
For the years ended October 31, 1998 1997 1996 1995 Net sales $801,131 $648,984 $637,368 $719,345 Other income: Interest and other 7,466 12,918 5,214 5,822 Gain on timber sales 21,553 12,681 9,626 8,067830,150 674,583 652,208 733,234 Costs and expenses (including depreciation of $35,585 in 1998, $30,660 in 1997 and $26,348 in 1996 and $22,944 in 1995)1996): Cost of products sold 563,665644,892 562,165 515,775 561,118 Selling, general and administrative 78,74390,282 74,058 68,220 73,733Restructuring costs 27,461 6,185 -- Interest 11,928 2,670 517 472774,563 645,078 584,512 635,323 Income before income taxes 55,587 29,505 67,696 97,911 Taxes on incomeIncome taxes 22,483 11,419 24,949 37,778 Net income $ 33,104 $ 18,086 $ 42,747 $ 60,133 Net incomeBasic and diluted earnings per share (based on the average number of shares outstanding during the year): Based on the assumption that earnings were allocated to Class A and Class B Common Stock to the extent that dividends were actually paid for the year and the remainder were allocated as they would be received by shareholders in the event of liquidation, that is, equally to Class A and Class B shares, share and share alike:share:
1998 1997 1996 1995 Class A Common Stock $ .64 $1.75 $2.391.15 $ .63 $ 1.48 Class B Common Stock $ .93 $1.98 $2.581.71 $ .94 $ 2.22
Due to the special characteristics of the Company's two classes of stock (see Note 5), earnings per share can be calculated upon the basis of varying assumptions, none of which, in the opinion of management, would be free from the claim that it fails fully and accurately to represent the true interest of the shareholders of each class of stock and in the retained earnings.[FN] See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements. 2734 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) GREIF BROS. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS October 31, 1998 1997 1996 CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 17,71941,329 $ 26,56017,719 Canadian government securities 6,654 7,533 19,479 Trade accounts receivable - less allowance of $847$2,918 for doubtful items ($826847 in 1996)1997) 113,931 81,582 73,987 Inventories 64,851 44,892 49,290Deferred tax asset 13,355 5,719 Prepaid expenses and other 21,192 16,13116,626 15,473 Total current assets 256,746 172,918 185,447 LONG TERMLONG-TERM ASSETS Cash surrender value of life insurance 1,070 2,982 Goodwill - less amortization 123,677 17,352 4,617 Other long termlong-term assets 20,952 7,11627,395 22,022 151,072 39,374 14,715 PROPERTIES, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT - at cost Timber properties - less depletion 9,067 6,884 6,112 Land 17,294 11,139 10,771 Buildings 60,839 139,713 125,132 Machinery and equipment etc.505,236 424,177 385,834 ConstructionCapital projects in progress 17,045 17,546 33,450 Less accumulatedAccumulated depreciation (287,936) (261,662) (249,123)421,545 337,797 312,176$829,363 $550,089 $512,338 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[FN] See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 2835 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) GREIF BROS. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY October 31, 1998 1997 1996 CURRENT LIABILITIES Outstanding checks in excess of funds on deposit $ 6,951 $ 5,122 Accounts payable $ 37,390 $ 31,60938,410 30,589 Current portion of long termlong-term obligations -- 8,504 2,455 Accrued payrolls and employee benefits 13,821 8,989 Accrued taxes - general 97 1,949 Taxes on income 596 5,6789,859 9,502 Restructuring reserves 32,411 4,319 Other current liabilities 10,604 2,372 Total current liabilities 98,235 60,408 50,680 LONG TERM OBLIGATIONSLONG-TERM LIABILITIES Long-term obligations 235,000 43,648 22,748 OTHER LONG TERM LIABILITIESDeferred tax liability 36,412 29,740 Postretirement benefit liability 25,554 -- Other long-term liabilities 17,230 16,155 15,406 DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 29,740 22,872 Total long termlong-term liabilities 314,196 89,543 61,026 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Capital stock, without par value 9,936 9,739 9,034 Class A Common Stock: Authorized 32,000,000 shares; issued 21,140,960 shares; outstanding 10,900,67210,909,672 shares (10,873,172(10,900,672 in 1996)1997) Class B Common Stock: Authorized and issued 17,280,000 shares; outstanding 12,001,793 shares Treasury stock, at cost (41,858) (41,868) (41,867) Class A Common Stock: 10,240,28810,231,288 shares (10,267,788(10,240,288 in 1996)1997) Class B Common Stock: 5,278,207 shares Retained earnings 456,898 437,550 436,672 Cumulative translation adjustment (8,044) (5,283) (3,207)416,932 400,138 400,632$829,363 $550,089 $512,338 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
[FN] See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 2936 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) GREIF BROS. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Dollars in thousands)
For the years ended October 31, 1998 1997 1996 1995 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $ 33,104 $ 18,086 $ 42,747 $ 60,133 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation, depletion and amortization 39,686 31,926 26,420 23,002 Deferred income taxes (964) 4,703 9,308 6,597 Gain on disposals of properties, plants and equipment, net (1,747) (7,023) (412) (331) Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in certain assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: Trade accounts receivable (4,271) (769) 4,831 (7,449) Inventories (2,794) 9,660 6,356 (2,932) Prepaid expenses and other (1,367) (2,563) 420 (2,098) Other long termlong-term assets (5,447) (11,719) (75) (1,344)Outstanding checks in excess of funds on deposit 1,829 3,979 (1,840) Accounts payable 1,809 (5,481) 2,987(467) (2,170) (3,641) Accrued payrolls and employee benefits 4,449(2,729) 130 (1,904) 3,800 Accrued taxes - general (1,871) (37) 2 Taxes on income (5,118) 5,449 (587)Restructuring reserves 17,858 4,319 -- Other long termcurrent liabilities 6,288 (6,989) 5,412 Postretirement benefit liability (1,765) -- -- Other long-term liabilities (352) (1,455) (5,716) 4,040 Net cash provided by operating activities 76,862 40,115 81,906 85,820 Cash flows from investing activities: Acquisitions of companies, net of cash acquired (186,472) (41,121) (284) -- Disposals of investments in government securities -- 12,585 1,481 9,211 Purchases of investments in government securities -- (639) (1,979) (4,223) Purchases of properties, plants and equipment (38,093) (36,193) (74,395) (61,066) Proceeds on disposals of properties, plants and equipment 3,041 7,634 851 745 Net cash used in investing activities (221,524) (57,734) (74,326) (55,333) Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of long termlong-term obligations 271,000 52,753 11,329 12,000 Payments on long termlong-term obligations (88,152) (25,804) (3,692) (25,849) Payments on short termshort-term obligations -- -- (6,668) Debt issuance costs (410) -- -- Acquisitions of treasury stock -- (31) -- (2,647) Exercise of stock options 207 735 -- -- Dividends paid (13,756) (17,208) (13,740) (12,180) Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 168,889 10,445 (12,771) (28,676) Foreign currency translation adjustmentEffects of exchange rates on cash (617) (1,667) 139 258 Net increase (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents 23,610 (8,841) (5,052) 2,069 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 17,719 26,560 31,612 29,543 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 17,71941,329 $ 26,56017,719 $ 31,612 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements26,560
[FN] See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 3037 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) GREIF BROS. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
Cumulative Capital Stock Treasury Stock Retained Translation Share-Shareholders' Shares Amount Shares Amount Earnings Adjustment holders' Equity Balance at November 1, 1994 24,182 $9,034 14,239 $(38,129) $359,712 $(3,678) $326,939 Net income 60,133 60,133 Dividends paid (Note 5): Class A - $.40 (4,349) (4,349) Class B - $.59 (7,831) (7,831) Treasury shares acquired (107) 107 (2,647) (2,647) Translation gain 288 288 Balance at October 31, 1995 24,075 9,034$9,034 14,346 (40,776) 407,665 (3,390) 372,533$(40,776) $407,665 $(3,390) $372,533 Net income 42,747 42,747 Dividends paid (Note 5): Class A - $.48 (5,219) (5,219) Class B - $.71 (8,521) (8,521) Treasury shares acquired (1,200) 1,200 (1,091) (1,091) Foreign currency Translation gain 183 183 Balance at October 31, 1996 22,875 9,034$9,034 15,546 (41,867) 436,672 (3,207) 400,632$(41,867) $436,672 $(3,207) $400,632 Net income 18,086 18,086 Dividends paid (Note 5): Class A - $.60 (6,526) (6,526) Class B - $.89 (10,682) (10,682) Treasury shares acquired (1) 1 (31) (31) Stock options exercised 28 705 (28) 30 735 Translation lossForeign currency translation (2,076) (2,076) Balance at October 31, 1997 22,902 $9,739 15,519 $(41,868) $437,550 $(5,283) $400,138 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNet income 33,104 33,104 Dividends paid (Note 5): Class A - $.48 (5,235) (5,235) Class B - $.71 (8,521) (8,521) Stock options exercised 9 197 (9) 10 207 Foreign currency translation (2,761) (2,761) Balance at October 31, 1998 22,911 $9,936 15,510 $(41,858) $456,898 $(8,044) $416,932
[FN] See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 3138 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) GREIF BROS. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Business Greif Bros. Corporation and its subsidiaries (the "Company") principally manufactures industrial shipping containers and containerboard and related products which it sells to customers in many industries primarily in the United States, Canada and Mexico. The Company operates over 100 locations in 28 states of the United States, three provinces of Canada and one state of Mexico. Basis of Consolidation The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Greif Bros. Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company).subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant estimates are related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, expected useful lives assigned to property, plant and equipment and goodwill, restructuring reserves, postretirement benefits, income taxes and contingencies. Actual amounts could differ from those estimated. Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when goods are shipped. Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)("SFAS") No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". In accordance with this statement, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as measured by enacted tax rates currentlythat are expected to be in effect.effect in the periods which the deferred tax liabilities and assets are expected to be settled or realized. 39 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents. Included in these amounts are repurchase agreements of $23,300,000 in 1998 ($9,300,000 in 1997). Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of trade accounts receivable. Such credit risk is considered by management to be limited due to the Company's many customers, none of whom are considered principal in the total operations of the Company, doing business in a variety of industries throughout the United States, Canada and certificates of deposit of $4,800,000 and $4,700,000, respectively, in 1997 ($6,100,000 and $13,400,000, respectively, in 1996).Mexico. Canadian Government Securities The Canadian government securities are classified as available-for-saleavailable-for- sale and, as such, are reported at their fair value which approximates amortized cost. These securities have maturities to 2002. During 1997, theThe Company received $10,600,000 in proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities ($3,600,000 in 1995).1997. The realized gains and losses included in income are immaterial. 32 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) Inventories Inventories are comprised principally of raw materials and are stated at the lower of cost (principally(approximately 90% on last-in, first-out basis) or market. IfThe inventories were stated on the first-in, first-out basis, the balance would be $47,000,000 greaterare comprised as follows (Dollars in 1997, $48,400,000 greater in 1996 and $57,600,000 greater in 1995.thousands): 1998 1997 Finished goods $ 20,557 $ 9,833 Raw materials and work- in-process 87,694 82,059 108,251 91,892 Reduction to state certain inventories on last-in, first- out basis (43,400) (47,000) $ 64,851 $ 44,892
During 1997 1996 and 1995,1996, the Company experienced slight LIFOlast-in, first-out liquidations which were deemed to be immaterial to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Properties, Plants 40 Item 8. Financial Statements and Equipment Depreciation on properties, plants and equipment is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Accelerated depreciation methods are used for income tax purposes.Supplementary Data (continued) Properties, Plants and Equipment Depreciation on properties, plants and equipment is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: Years Buildings 30-45 Machinery and equipment 3-19
[FN] Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to incomeexpense as incurred. Depletion on timber properties is computed on the basis of cost and the estimated recoverable timber acquired. When properties are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the asset and related allowance accounts. Gains or losses are credited or charged to income as applicable.incurred. Internal Use Software In 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use". Internal use software is software that is acquired, internally developed or modified solely to meet the entity's needs and for which, during the software's development or modification, a plan does not exist to market the software externally. Costs incurred to develop the software during the application development stage, upgrades and enhancements that provide additional functionality should be capitalized. Adoption of SOP 98-1 did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. Goodwill Goodwill is amortized on a straight-line basis over fifteen years. The Company periodically reviews its goodwill to determine if an impairment has occurred.twenty- five year periods. Amortization expense was $3,547,000 in 1998, $1,032,000 in 1997 and $20,000 in 1996. Accumulated amortization was $1,052,000$4,599,000 at October 31, 19971998 ($19,0001,052,000 at October 31, 1996)1997). Fair ValueThe Company's policy is to periodically review its goodwill and other long-lived assets based upon the evaluation of such factors as the occurrence of a significant adverse event or change in the environment in which the business operates or if the expected future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) would become less than the carrying amount of the asset. An impairment loss would be recorded in the period such determination is made based on the fair value of the related businesses. 41 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, Canadian government securities and long termlong-term obligations approximate their fair values. The carrying amounts of the interest rate swap agreements are zero at October 31, 1998 and $(13,000) at October 31, 1997. The fair valuevalues of long termthe interest rate swap agreements are $(7,020,000) at October 31, 1998 and $(514,000) at October 31, 1997. The fair values of the long-term obligations isare estimated based on quoted market prices on current rates offeredavailable to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The carryingfair values of the interest rate swap agreements (see Note 4) approximate their fair values, ashave been determined by the counterparties. 33 Item 8. Financial StatementsThe Company uses interest rate swaps for the purpose of hedging its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. The swaps meet the requirements of designation and Supplementary Data (continued)correlation for use of the accrual method of accounting. Differentials in the swapped amounts are recorded as adjustments of the underlying periodic cash flows that are being hedged. Foreign Currency Translation In accordance with SFAS No. 52, "Foreign Currency Translation", the assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange existing at year-end and revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates. The cumulative translation adjustments, which represent the effects of translating assets and liabilities of the Company's foreign operations, are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity. The transaction gains and losses included in income are immaterial. UseEarnings Per Share During 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share". The provisions of EstimatesSFAS No. 128 have been retroactively applied to 1997 and 1996. The preparationCompany has two classes of financial statementscommon stock and, as such, applies the "two-class method" of computing earnings per share as prescribed in conformitySFAS No. 128. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires managementthe statement, earnings are allocated first to make certain estimatesClass A and assumptionsClass B Common Stock to the extent that affectdividends are actually paid and the amounts reportedremainder allocated assuming all of the earnings for the period have been distributed in the financial statementsform of dividends. 42 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) The following is a reconciliation of the shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share:
For the year ended October 31, 1998 1997 1996 Class A Common Stock: Basic earnings per share 10,905,692 10,878,233 10,873,172 Assumed conversion of stock options 69,014 16,670 13,904 Diluted earnings per share 10,974,706 10,894,903 10,887,076 Class B Common Stock: Basic and diluted earnings per share 12,001,793 12,001,793 12,021,793
[FN] There are 12,000 options that are antidilutive for 1998 (298,600 for 1997 and accompanying notes. Actual164,100 for 1996). Environmental Cleanup Costs The Company expenses environmental expenditures related to existing conditions resulting from past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernable. Expenditures which extend the life of the related property or mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination are capitalized. The Company determines its liability on a site by site basis and records a liability at the time when it is probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company's estimated liability is reduced to reflect the anticipated participation of other potentially responsible parties in those instances where it is probable that such parties are legally responsible and financially capable of paying their respective shares of the relevant costs. Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts could differ from those estimates. Operations by Industry Segment Information concerninghave been reclassified to conform to the Company's industry segments, presented on pages 3-4 of this Form 10-K, is an integral part of these financial statements.1998 presentation. Recent Accounting Standards During 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share", SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", and SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information". SFAS No. 128 (effective in 1998 for the Company) requires companies to present basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. The adoption of the new standard is not expected to have a material effect on the presentation of earnings per share. SFAS No. 130, which will not be effective until 1999 for the Company, requires companies to present comprehensive income, which is comprised of net income and other charges and credits to equity that are not the result of transactions with the owners, in its financial statements. Currently, the only item in addition to net income that would be included in comprehensive income is the cumulative translation adjustment. 3443 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) SFAS No. 131, which will not be effective until 1999 for the Company, requires that reporting segments be redefined in terms of a company's operating segments. Adoption of the new standard is not expected to have a significantThe impact on the presentation of the Company's segments.segments has not yet been determined. In February 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132, "Employer's Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits - an amendment to FASB Statements No. 87, No. 88 and No. 106", which is effective in 1999 for the Company. The statement requires the Company to revise disclosures about pension and other postretirement benefit plans. SFAS No. 132 will not affect the Company's results of operations, however, the impact on the presentation of the Company's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements has not been determined. In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", which is effective in 2000 for the Company. The statement requires that all derivatives be recorded in the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities and be measured at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. The Company has not determined what impact SFAS No. 133 will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements. NOTE 2 - ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS On March 30, 1998, pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Sonoco Products Company ("Sonoco"), the Company acquired the industrial containers business of Sonoco by purchasing all of the outstanding shares of KMI Continental Fibre Drum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("KMI"), Sonoco Plastic Drum, Inc., an Illinois corporation ("SPD"), GBC Holding Co., a Delaware corporation ("GBC Holding"), and Fibro Tambor, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation ("Fibro Tambor") and the membership interest of Sonoco in Total Packaging Systems of Georgia, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("TPS"). KMI, SPD, GBC Holding, Fibro Tambor, TPS and their respective subsidiaries are in the business of manufacturing and selling plastic and fibre drums principally in the United States and Mexico and refurbishing and reconditioning plastic drums principally in the United States and Mexico. On March 30, 1998, the Company entered into an agreement with Sonoco to acquire its intermediate bulk containers business, which the parties intend to finalize as soon as receipt of necessary approvals are obtained. Pending receipt of such approvals, the Company markets and sells intermediate bulk containers for Sonoco under a distributorship agreement. 44 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) As consideration for the shares of KMI, SPD, GBC Holding and Fibro Tambor and the membership interest of Sonoco in TPS, the Company paid $185,395,000 in cash. In addition, the Company paid $1,218,000 in legal and professional fees related to the acquisition. The acquisition was funded through new long-term obligations (see Note 4). The acquisition of the industrial containers business of Sonoco has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon their fair values at the date of acquisition. The fair values of the tangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed were $129,504,000 and $52,298,000 respectively. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired of $109,407,000 has been recorded as goodwill. The Company's purchase price allocation has not been finalized with respect to certain employee benefit and tax matters which could possibly reduce goodwill up to $10 million. The goodwill is being amortized on a straight-line basis over twenty-five years based on consideration regarding the age of the acquired companies, their customers and the risk of obsolescence of their products. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the operating results of the acquired businesses from the date of acquisition. In addition, the income resulting from the distributorship agreement relating to the intermediate bulk containers business has been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements since March 30, 1998. However, the income related to the intermediate bulk containers business has not been reflected in the pro forma figures prior to that time. The following summarized pro forma (unaudited) information assumes the acquisition had occurred on November 1, 1996 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts): For the year ended October 31, 1998 1997 Net sales $871,969 $830,912 Net income $ 30,876 $ 15,425 Basic and diluted earnings per share: Class A Common Stock $ 1.07 $ .54 Class B Common Stock $ 1.60 $ .80
[FN] The above amounts reflect adjustments for interest expense related to the debt issued for the purchase, amortization of goodwill and depreciation expense on the revalued property, plant and equipment. 45 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) The pro forma information, as presented above, is not necessarily indicative of the results which would have been obtained had the transactions occurred at November 1, 1996, nor are they necessarily indicative of future results. In November 1996, the Company purchased the assets of Aero Box Company, a corrugated container company, located in Michigan. In March 1997, the Company acquired the assets of two steel drum manufacturing plants located in California and Ontario, Canada. In May 1997, the Company purchased all of the outstanding common stock of Independent Container, Inc., a corrugated container company with two locations in Kentucky and a location in Indiana. In June 1997, the Company purchased all of the outstanding common stock of Centralia Container, Inc., located in Illinois. The prior year acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon the fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the operating results of each business from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the results of these acquisitions were not significant to the Company. In February 1997, the Company sold its injection molding plant in Ohio. In addition, the Company sold its wood component facilities, which manufactured door panels, wood moldings and window and door parts, with locations in Kentucky, California, Washington and Oregon in August 1997. The transactions resulted in a gain of $3.7 million which is included in other income. NOTE 3 - RESTRUCTURING COSTS During the third quarter of 1998, the Company approved a plan to consolidate some of its locations in order to improve operating efficiencies and capabilities. The plan was the result of a study to determine whether certain locations, either existing or newly acquired, should be closed or relocated to a different facility. Eighteen existing fibre drum, steel drum and corrugated container plants will be closed. As a result, the Company recognized a pretax restructuring charge of approximately $27.5 million, consisting of $20.9 million in employee separation costs (approximately 500 employees) and $6.6 million in other anticipated facility closing and disposition costs. The Company expects to sell its owned facilities. As of October 31, 1998, the Company has paid approximately $2.7 million consisting primarily of severance payments. The Company expects the remaining liability of $24.8 million to be expended in connection with the ongoing consolidation effort during 1999. 46 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) In addition, in connection with the consolidation plan, five locations purchased as part of the industrial containers business of Sonoco (see Note 2) will also be closed. Accordingly, the Company recognized a $9.5 million restructuring liability related to these locations. The liability consisted of $6.1 million in employee separation costs (approximately 100 employees) and $3.4 million in other anticipated facility closing and disposition costs. The Company expects to sell its owned facilities. As of October 31, 1998, the Company has paid approximately $1.9 million consisting primarily of severance payments. The Company believes the remaining liability of $7.6 million will be expended in connection with the ongoing consolidation during 1999. During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company adopted a plan to consolidate its operations. This plan included the relocation of certain key operating people to the corporate office. In addition, there was a realignment of some of the administrative functions that were being performed at the subsidiary and division offices which resulted in some staff reductions. Finally, costs associated with the reduction of certain support functions were incurred. As a result, a restructuring charge of $6.2 million, consisting primarily of severance benefits, was recorded in the results of operations duringoperations. As of October 31, 1998, all expenditures related to the fourth quarter of 1997. 35 Item 8. Financial Statementscharge have been made and Supplementary Data (continued)the liability accordingly eliminated. NOTE 4 - LONG TERMLONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS The Company's long termlong-term obligations, which are primarily with banks, include the following as of October 31 (Dollars in thousands):
1998 1997 1996 Notes Payable:payable: Fixed rate notes - 5.91% to 9.69%, due 1998 - 2015, secured by certain equipment, real estate, inventory and receivables $ 1,558-- $ 1,9881,558 Variable rate notes - LIBOR plus .25% to .49% or Prime Rate plus 1%, due 1999 - 2004, certain notes secured by equipment -- 35,544 8,609 Revolving credit agreement and lines of credit: Variable rate - tied to LIBOR or Prime Rate, expiring in 2003 (in 2000 for 1997) 235,000 15,050 12,830 Total 235,000 52,152 23,427 Capital lease obligation -- 1,776 Less: current portion -- 8,504 2,455 Long termLong-term obligations $235,000 $43,648 $22,748
Long term obligations have generally resulted from acquisitions 47 Item 8. Financial Statements and capital improvements. Certain loan agreements contain debt covenants related toSupplementary Data (continued) On March 30, 1998, the Company entered into a credit agreement with various financial position or results of operations of the Company. The Company hasinstitutions, as banks, and KeyBank National Association, as agent, which provides a revolving credit agreementfacility of up to $325 million. The Company is required to pay a facility fee each quarter equal to .025% to .050% of the total commitment amount based upon the Company's leverage ratio. As of October 31, 1998, the Company has borrowed $235 million primarily to purchase the industrial containers business of Sonoco and linesto consolidate all of credit totaling $62 million.the Company's other long-term borrowings. The costs associated with consolidation of the Company's debt are not material to the results of operations. The interest rate is either based on the prime rate or LIBOR rate plus a calculated margin amount (.28% at October 31, 1998). Interest resets on a quarterly basis. At October 31, 1997,1998, the interest rate is 5.50%. The revolving credit loans are due on March 31, 2003, however, management intends to extend a portion of the debt beyond that date. At October 31, 1998, the Company has $47outstanding $6.8 million availablein letters of credit under itsthe credit agreement. The quarterly fee related to these letters of credit is .03% of the outstanding amount plus a calculated margin (.28% at October 31, 1998). The revolving credit facility contains certain covenants. Under the most restrictive of these covenants, the Company is required to maintain a certain leverage ratio, sufficient coverage of interest expense and a minimum net worth. In addition, the Company is limited with respect to additional debt. Finally, there are certain non-financial covenants including sales of assets, financial reporting, mergers and acquisitions, investments, change in control and Employee Retirement Income Security Act compliance. During 1998, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $140 million, expiring on March 30, 2008, which periodically reduces through 2008. The Company entered into another swap agreement during 1998 with a notional amount of $20 million, expiring on October 31, 2001. The interest rate swaps were entered into to manage the Company's exposure to its variable rate debt. Under the agreements, the Company receives interest quarterly from the counterparty equal to the LIBOR rate and linespays interest quarterly to the counterparty at a fixed rate of credit.6.15% and 5.22% for the $140 million and $20 million swap agreements, respectively. The differentials to be currently paid or received under these agreements are recorded as an adjustment to interest expense and are included in interest receivable or payable. The adjustment to interest expense resulting from the differencials was an increase of $348,000 during 1998. 48 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) During 1997, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with aggregate notional amounts of $32,685,000$32.7 million without the exchange of underlying principal. The interest rate swaps were entered into to manage the Company's exposure to variable rate debt. Under such agreements, the Company receivesreceived interest from the counterparties equal to amounts incurred under its existing variable rate debt and payspaid interest to the counterparties at fixed rates ranging from 6.43% to 7.39%. During 1998, all of these swap agreements were terminated. The differentialamounts paid by the Company to be paid and received under suchterminate these agreements is recorded as an adjustmentwere immaterial to interest expense and is included in interest receivable or payable. The agreements expire within seven years.the Consolidated Financial Statements. Annual maturities of long termlong-term obligations are $8,504,000$235 million in 1998, $7,895,000 in 1999, $22,737,000 in 2000, $7,503,000 in 2001, $3,049,000 in 2002 and $2,464,000 thereafter. 36 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued)2003. During 1997,1998, the Company paid $3,726,000$11,500,000 of interest ($862,0003,726,000 in 19961997 and $1,359,000$862,000 in 1995)1996) related to the long termlong-term obligations. Interest of $344,000 in 1998, $1,163,000 in 1997 and $569,000 in 1996 and $780,000 in 1995 was capitalized. During 1997, the capital lease obligation relating to land, building and machinery and equipment at one of the Company's plant locations was assumed by another party through the disposal of a plant. The amount that was capitalized under this agreement was $2,708,000 and had accumulated depreciation of $606,000 as of October 31, 1996. The Company has entered into non-cancelable operating leases for buildings, trucks and office space.computer equipment. The future minimum lease payments for the non- cancelablenon-cancelable operating leases are $1,473,000 in 1998, $992,000$5,164,000 in 1999, $630,000$4,312,000 in 2000, $578,000$3,890,000 in 2001, $298,000$2,589,000 in 2002, $1,864,000 in 2003 and $250,000$2,762,000 thereafter. Rent expense was $8,615,000 in 1998, $5,684,000 in 1997 and $3,592,000 in 1996 and $3,246,000 in 1995.1996. NOTE 5 - CAPITAL STOCK Class A Common Stock is entitled to cumulative dividends of 1 cent a share per year after which Class B Common Stock is entitled to non- cumulative dividends up to 1/2 cent a share per year. Further distribution in any year must be made in proportion of 1 cent a share for Class A Common Stock to 1 1/2 cents a share for Class B Common Stock. The Class A Common Stock shall have no voting power nor shall it be entitled to notice of meetings of the shareholders, all rights to vote and all voting power being vested exclusively in the Class B Common Stock unless four quarterly cumulative dividends upon the Class A Common Stock are in arrears. There is no cumulative voting. NOTE 6 - STOCK OPTIONS In 1996, a Directors' Stock Option Plan (Directors' Plan) was adopted which provides the granting of stock options to Directors who are not employees of the Company. The aggregate number of the Company's Class A Common Stock which options may be granted may not exceed 100,000 shares. Under the terms of the Directors' Plan, options are granted at exercise prices equal to the market value on the date options are granted and become exercisable immediately. As of October 31, 1997, no options have been exercised. Options expire ten years after date of grant. 37 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) During 1995, the Company adoptedhas an Incentive Stock Option Plan (Option Plan)("Option Plan") which provides the discretionary granting of incentive stock options to key employees and non-statutory options for non-employees. The aggregate number of the Company's Class A Common Stock which options may be granted shall not exceed 1,000,000 shares. Under the terms of the Option Plan, options are granted at exercise prices equal to the market value on the date the options are granted and become exercisable after two years from theafter date of grant. Options expire ten years after date of grant. 49 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) A Directors' Stock Option Plan ("Directors' Plan") which was adopted in 1996, provides the granting of stock options to Directors who are not employees of the Company. The aggregate number of the Company's Class A Common Stock which options may be granted may not exceed 100,000 shares. Under the terms of the Directors' Plan, options are granted at exercise prices equal to the market value on the date options are granted and become exercisable immediately. Options expire ten years after date of grant. In 1998, 206,275 incentive stock options were granted with option prices of $31.75 per share. Under the Directors' Plan, 12,000 options were granted to outside directors with option prices of $36.53 per share. In 1997, 136,500 incentive stock options were granted with option prices of $30.00 per share. Under the Directors' Plan, 12,000 options were granted to outside directors with option prices of $30.50 per share. In 1996, 152,100 incentive stock options were granted with option prices of $29.62 per share. Under the Directors' Plan, 12,000 options were granted to outside directors with option prices of $30.00 per share. In 1995, 155,000 and 44,500 incentive stock options were granted with option prices of $26.19 per share and $22.94 per share, respectively. In addition, 10,000 non-statutory options were granted with option prices of $23.75 per share. The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. If compensation cost would have been determined based on the fair values at the date of grant under SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", pro forma net income and earnings per share would have been as follows (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
1998 1997 1996 Net income $17,133 $42,486 Net income$31,718 $17,232 $42,534 Basic earnings per share: Class A Common Stock $.60 $1.74$ 1.10 $ .60 $ 1.48 Class B Common Stock $.89 $1.97$ 1.64 $ .89 $ 2.20 Diluted earnings per share: Class A Common Stock $ 1.10 $ .60 $ 1.47 Class B Common Stock $ 1.64 $ .89 $ 2.20
50 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) The fair value for each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, as allowed under SFAS No. 123, with the following assumptions:
1998 1997 1996 Dividend yield 1.36% 1.31% 1.16% Volatility rate 22.00% 20.60% 29.20% Risk-free interest rate 5.36% 6.29% 6.52% Expected option life 6 years 6 years 6 years
38 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) The weighted fair value of shares granted were $9.08, $9.03 and $10.95 at October 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Stock option activity was as follows (Shares in thousands):
1998 1997 1996 1995 Weighted Weighted Weighted Average Average Average Exercise Exercise Exercise Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price Beginning Balancebalance 456 $28.26 374 $27.25 210 $25.38 -- $ -- Granted 218 32.01 148 30.04 164 29.62 210 25.38 Forfeited 6 29.63 38 27.11 -- -- -- -- Exercised 9 22.94 28 25.79 -- -- -- -- Expired -- -- -- -- -- -- Ending Balancebalance 659 $29.56 456 $28.26 374 $27.25 210 $25.38
As of October 31, 1998, the outstanding stock options had exercise prices ranging from $22.94 to $36.53 and a remaining weighted average contractual life of 8.42 years. There are 181,000317,000 options which were exercisable at October 31, 1997 (12,0001998 (181,000 options at October 31, 1996)1997). During 1996, the Company purchased all rights to options granted under a stock option plan at one of its subsidiaries and subsequently eliminated the plan. 3951 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) NOTE 7 - INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense is comprised as follows (Dollars in thousands):
State U.S. and Federal Foreign Local Total 1997:1998: Current $15,755 $ 3,6172,768 $ 2,0973,039 $21,562 Deferred 1,763 -- (842) 921 $17,518 $ 1,6072,768 $ 2,197 $22,483 1997: Current $ 3,617 $ 2,097 $ 1,607 $ 7,321 Deferred 4,087 (96) 107 4,098 $ 7,704 $ 2,001 $ 1,714 $11,419 1996: Current $11,330 $ 3,075 $ 1,630 $16,035 Deferred 4,087 (96) 107 4,0987,903 (59) 1,070 8,914 $19,233 $ 7,7043,016 $ 2,001 $ 1,714 $11,419 1996: Current $11,330 $ 3,075 $ 1,630 $16,035 Deferred 7,903 (59) 1,070 8,914 $19,233 $ 3,016 $ 2,700 $24,949 1995: Current $27,053 $ 1,616 $ 3,567 $32,236 Deferred 3,655 258 1,629 5,542 $30,708 $ 1,874 $ 5,196 $37,778 Foreign income before income taxes amounted to $5,241,000 in 1997 ($7,729,000 in 1996 and $4,452,000 in 1995)2,700 $24,949
[FN] Foreign income before income taxes amounted to $6,212,000 in 1998 ($5,241,000 in 1997 and $7,729,000 in 1996). The following is a reconciliation of the U.S. Federal statutory Federal income tax rate to the Company's effective tax rate:
1998 1997 1996 1995 U.S. Federal statutory tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% State and local taxes, net of Federal tax benefit 2.6% 3.8% 3.6% 3.9% Other (.1%2.9% (0.1%) (1.7%) (.3%) Effective income tax rate 40.5 % 38.7% 36.9% 38.6%
4052 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows at October 31 (Dollars in thousands):
1998 1997 1996 Restructuring reserve $ 8,964 $ -- Other 4,391 5,729 Current deferred tax assetsasset $13,355 $ 5,729 $ 3,564 Current deferred tax liabilitiesliability $ 10-- $ 2910 Book basis on acquired assets $10,108 $10,159 $11,432Postretirement benefit liability 8,237 -- Other 2,496 2,249 551 Long termLong-term deferred tax assetsasset $20,841 $12,408 $11,983 DepreciationProperty, plant and equipment $41,896 $35,448 $27,974Intangibles 8,410 78 Timber condemnation 3,868 3,557 2,873 Undistributed Canadian net income 1,627 1,753 Pension costs 1,111 1,887 Other 405 368 Long term3,079 3,065 Long-term deferred tax liabilities $42,148 $34,855 At October 31, 1997, the Company has provided deferred income taxes on all of its undistributed Canadian earnings. During 1997, the Company paid $13,334,000 in income taxes ($10,318,000 in 1996 and $35,692,000 in 1995)liability $57,253 $42,148
[FN] At October 31, 1998 and 1997, the Company has provided deferred income taxes on all of its undistributed Canadian earnings. [FN] During 1998, the Company paid $22,697,000 in income taxes ($13,334,000 in 1997 and $10,318,000 in 1996). NOTE 8 - RETIREMENT PLANS The Company has non-contributory defined benefit pension plans that cover most of its employees. These plans include plans self-administered by the Company along with Union administered multi-employer plans. The self- administeredself-administered hourly and Union plans' benefits are based primarily upon years of service. The self-administered salaried plans' benefits are based primarily on years of service and earnings. The Company contributes an amount that is not less than the minimum funding nor more than the maximum tax-deductible amount to these plans. The plans' assets consist of unallocated insurance contracts, equity securities, government obligations and the allowable amount of the Company's stock (127,752 shares of Class A Common Stock and 77,75580,355 shares of Class B Common Stock at October 31, 19971998 and 1996)1997). 4153 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) The pension expense for the plans included the following (Dollars in thousands):
1998 1997 1996 1995 Service cost, benefits earned during the year $ 2,956 $ 2,714 $ 2,648 $2,365 Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 4,584 4,548 4,277 3,839 Actual return on assets (3,280) (8,986) (6,404) (4,646) Net amortization (2,721) 3,974 1,759 2631,539 2,250 2,280 1,821 Multi-employer and non-U.S. pension expense 386 370 593 790 Total pension expense $ 2,6201,925 $ 2,620 $ 2,873 $2,611 The range of weighted average discount rate and expected long term rate of return on plan assets used in the actuarial valuation was 7.0% - 9.0% for 1997, 1996 and 1995. The rate of compensation increases for salaried employees used in the actuarial valuation range from 4.0% - 6.5% for 1997, 1996 and 1995.
42 Item 8. Financial Statements[FN] The range of weighted average discount rates and Supplementary Data (continued)expected long-term rates of return on plan assets used in the actuarial valuation was 7.0% - 9.0% for 1998, 1997 and 1996. The rates of compensation increases for salaried employees used in the actuarial valuation range from 4.0% - 6.5% for 1998, 1997 and 1996. The following table sets forth the plans' funded status and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollars in thousands):
Assets Exceed Accumulated Accumulated Benefits Benefits Exceed Assets 1998 1997 19961998 1997 1996 Actuarial present value of benefit obligations: Vested benefit obligation $13,697 $34,190 $31,675$44,478 $10,636 $ 9,243 Accumulated benefit obligation $13,824 $34,569 $32,113$44,872 $12,279 $10,782 Projected benefit obligation $18,785 $46,246 $46,085$57,438 $12,279 $10,782 Plan assets at fair value $23,376 $59,836 $52,423$51,610 $10,718 $10,257 Plan assets greater than (less than) projected benefit obligation $ 4,591 $13,590 6,338$(5,828) $(1,561) $(525) Unrecognized net (gain) loss (1,361) (8,942) (9,274)4,620 641 769 Prior service cost not yet recognized in net periodic pension cost 312 6,096 6,5879,617 2,788 2,368 Adjustment required to recognizeRecognize minimum liability -- -- (3,422) (1,048) (804) Unrecognized net (asset) obligation from transition (352) (7,345) 438(6,099) (2,381) (2,333) Prepaid pension cost (liability) $ 3,190 $ 3,399 $ 4,089$(1,112) $(1,561) $ (525) During 1997 and 1996, the Company, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions", recorded the "adjustment required to recognize minimum liability". The amount was offset by a long term asset, of an equal amount, recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
4354 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) During 1998 and 1997, the Company, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions", recorded the "adjustment required to recognize minimum liability" in other long-term liabilities. The amount was offset in other long-term assets by an equal amount. In addition to the defined benefit pension plans, the Company has several voluntary 401(k) savings plans which cover eligible employees at least 21 years of age with one year of service. For certain plans, the Company matches 25% of each employeesemployee's contribution, up to a maximum of 5% or 6% of base salary. Company contributions to the 401(k) plans were $566,000 in 1998, $350,000 in 1997 and $234,000 in 1996 and $27,000 in 1995.1996. NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTPOSTRETIREMENT HEALTH CARE AND LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS On December 10, 1997,March 30, 1998, the Company signedacquired the industrial containers business of Sonoco. As part of this acquisition, the Company assumed an obligation to reimburse Sonoco for their actual costs incurred in providing the postretirement health care benefits to certain employees. Contributions by the Company are limited to an aggregate annual payment of $1,350,000 ($1,012,500 in 1998) for eligible employees at the date of purchase. Further, the Company is responsible for the cost of certain union hourly employees who were not eligible at the date of closing. The Company intends to fund these benefits from operations. Cost for the postretirement benefits include the following components (Dollars in thousands):
1998 Service cost $ 380 Interest cost 1,133 $1,513
The following table summarizes the postretirement liability (Dollars in thousands):
1998 Accumulated postretirement benefit obligations: Retired participants $(19,378) Other participants (7,879) (27,257) Unrecognized net loss 1,703 Postretirement benefit liability $(25,554)
55 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) The measurement assumes a discount rate of 6.75%. The health care cost trend rates on gross eligible charges are as follows:
Medical Dental Current trend rate 8.75% 6.75% Ultimate trend rate 4.75% 4.75%
A one percentage-point increase in the assumed health care cost trend rates would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit liability as of October 31, 1998 by approximately $57,000 and the total of the service and interest cost components of net postretirement health care cost for the year then ended by approximately $122,000. NOTE 10 - CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against the Company, including those pertaining to environmental, product liability, safety and health matters. While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the ultimate liability cannot now be determined because of the considerable uncertainties that exist. Therefore, it is possible that results of operations or liquidity in a non-bindingparticular period could be materially affected by certain contingencies. However, based upon the facts currently available, management believes that the disposition of matters that are pending or asserted will not have a materially adverse affect on the financial position of the Company. NOTE 11 - INDUSTRY SEGEMENTS The Company operates in two industry segments, industrial shipping containers and materials ("Industrial Shipping Containers") and containerboard and related products ("Containerboard"). Operations in the Industrial Shipping Containers segment involve the production and sale of fibre, steel and plastic drums, multiwall bags and miscellaneous items. These products are manufactured and principally sold throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico. Operations in the Containerboard segment involve the production and sale of containerboard, both virgin and recycled, and related corrugated products including corrugated sheets and corrugated containers. The products are manufactured and sold in the United States and Canada. In computing operating profit for the two industry segments, gain on timber sales, interest expense, other income and expense, gains on disposals of certain facilities and income taxes have not been allocated to such segments. Furthermore, the restructuring costs (see Note 3) have not been allocated to the separate segments. These amounts, excluding income taxes, comprise "general corporate other income and expense, net". 56 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) Each segments' operating assets are those assets used in the manufacture and sale of Industrial Shipping Containers or Containerboard. Corporate assets are principally cash and cash equivalents, timber properties, corporate facilities and other. The following segment information is presented for the three years ended October 31, 1998, except as to asset information which is as of October 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 (Dollars in thousands):
1998 1997 1996 Net sales: Industrial Shipping Containers $444,130 $333,005 $322,330 Containerboard 357,001 315,979 315,038 Total $801,131 $648,984 $637,368 Operating profit: Industrial Shipping Containers $ 26,928 $ 10,687 $ 13,533 Containerboard 40,972 2,480 40,129 Total segment 67,900 13,167 53,662 General corporate other income and expense, net 15,148 22,523 14,034 Restructuring costs 27,461 6,185 -- Income before income taxes 55,587 29,505 67,696 Income taxes 22,483 11,419 24,949 Net income $ 33,104 $ 18,086 $ 42,747 Identifiable assets: Industrial Shipping Containers $439,614 $175,980 $166,235 Containerboard 324,052 309,373 290,009 Total segment 763,666 485,353 456,244 Corporate 65,697 64,736 56,094 Total $829,363 $550,089 $512,338 57 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) 1998 1997 1996 Depreciation expense: Industrial Shipping Containers $ 16,092 $ 11,971 $ 11,750 Containerboard 19,305 18,371 14,509 Total segment 35,397 30,342 26,259 Corporate 188 318 89 Total $ 35,585 $ 30,660 $ 26,348 Property additions: Industrial Shipping Containers $ 22,046 $ 3,843 $ 16,588 Containerboard 8,708 22,923 56,160 Total segment 30,754 26,766 72,748 Corporate assets 7,339 9,427 1,647 Total $ 38,093 $ 36,193 $ 74,395
NOTE 12 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS CorrChoice Joint Venture: On November 1, 1998, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement to form CorrChoice, Inc. ("CorrChoice"). The Joint Venture Agreement provides for the consolidation into CorrChoice of three sheet feeder plants of Michigan Packaging Company ("Michigan Packaging"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and three sheet feeder plants of Ohio Packaging Corporation and its subsidiaries ("Ohio Packaging"). Pursuant to the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement, the Company contributed all of its stock of Michigan Packaging and Ohio Packaging in exchange for a 63.24% ownership interest in CorrChoice and the minority interest contributed all of its stock of Ohio Packaging in exchange for a 36.76% ownership interest in CorrChoice. The ownership percentages of the Company and minority interest in CorrChoice were determined by an appraisal of Michigan Packaging and Ohio Packaging performed by an independent third party. The three Michigan Packaging plants are located in Mason, Michigan, Grand Rapids, Michigan and Concord, North Carolina. The three Ohio Packaging plants are located in Massillon, Ohio, Louisville, Kentucky and Cincinnati, Ohio. In addition to these locations, CorrChoice plans to establish a sheet feeder plant in the Atlanta, Georgia area. 58 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) Prior to the formation of the joint venture, the Company accounted for its investment in Ohio Packaging's non-voting stock under the cost method of accounting since it had no significant influence over the operations of Ohio Packaging. However, as a result of the Company's controlling interest in the joint venture effective November 1, 1998, the results of which will be consolidated, generally accepted accounting principles require the Company to retroactively adjust the financial statements of prior years using the equity method of accounting. The prior year adjustments will be a $4.1 million, $3.5 million and $3.5 million increase to net income during 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively, and will be reflected in all future reports. As a result of the cumulative adjustments, the Company's investment will be recorded as $49.1 million as of October 31, 1998. Based on independent appraisals, as discussed above, the fair value of this investment is $99.2 million. As discussed above, the Company will include the results of CorrChoice in its Consolidated Financial Statements subsequent to November 1, 1998. The following summarized pro forma (unaudited) information assumes the joint venture had occurred on November 1, 1997 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
1998 Net sales $895,723 Net income $ 36,169 Basic earnings per share: Class A Common Stock $ 1.26 Class B Common Stock $ 1.87 Diluted earnings per share: Class A Common Stock $ 1.25 Class B Common Stock $ 1.87
[FN] The pro forma information, as presented above, is not necessarily indicative of the results which would have been obtained had the transactions occurred at November 1, 1997, nor are they necessarily indicative of future results. Abzac Joint Venture: During December 1998, the Company and Abzac s.a., a privately held company in France ("Abzac"), entered into a letter of intent to acquire allfor the exchange of the outstanding shares of KMI Continental Fibre Drum, Inc., Fibro Tambor, S.A. de C.V. and Sonoco Plastic Drum, Inc., which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Sonoco Products Co. (Sonoco). In addition, the Company would purchase Sonoco'sCompany's spiral core manufacturing assets for a 49% equity interest in Total Packaging Systems of Georgia, LLC. These companies comprise the entire industrial container group of Sonoco and last year had combined annual net sales of approximately $210 million. The acquisition of these operations includes twelveAbzac's fibre drum plants and five plastic drum plants along with facilities for research and development, packaging services and distribution.business. The purchase price will be approximately $225 millionCompany manufactures spiral cores at three of its Canadian locations. Abzac, at three of its locations, manufactures fibre drums in cash andFrance. The transaction is subject to regulatory approval and due diligence review.and is anticipated to be completed during the third quarter of 1999. 4459 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) REPORT OF MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES To the Shareholders of Greif Bros. Corporation The Company's management is responsible for the financial and operating information included in this Annual Report to Shareholders, including the Consolidated Financial Statements of Greif Bros. Corporation and its subsidiaries. These statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and, as such, include certain estimates and judgments made by management. The system of internal accounting control, which is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial reporting, is established and maintained by the Company's management. This system is continually reviewed by the internal auditorauditors of the Company. In addition, Price WaterhousePricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent accounting firm, audits the financial statements of Greif Bros. Corporation and its subsidiaries and considers the internal control structure of the Company in planning and performing its audit. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors meets periodically with the internal auditorauditors and independent accountants to discuss the internal control structure and the results of their audits. /s/ Michael J. Gasser /s/ Joseph W. Reed Michael J. Gasser Joseph W. Reed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Officer and Secretary 4560 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (continued) REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Greif Bros. Corporation In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financialbalance sheets and the related consolidated statements listedof income, of changes in the index appearing under Item 14(a)(1) on page 48shareholders' equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Greif Bros. Corporation and its subsidiaries at October 31, 19971998 and 1996,1997, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 1997,1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above. /s/ Price WaterhousePricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Columbus, Ohio November 26, 1997, except as to Note 9, which is as of December 10, 19974, 1998 4661 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (concluded)(continued) QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited) The quarterly results of operations for fiscal 19971998 and 19961997 are shown below (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
Quarter Ended, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, July 31, Oct. 31, 1998 1998 1998 1998 Net sales $169,697 $191,269 $218,631 $221,534 Gross profit $ 31,520 $ 37,637 $ 38,382 $ 48,700 Net income (loss) $ 9,616 $ 12,592 $ (4,467) $ 15,363 Earnings per share: Basic: Class A Common Stock $ .34 $ .44 $ (.15) $ .53 Class B Common Stock $ .50 $ .65 $ (.23) $ .80 Diluted: Class A Common Stock $ .34 $ .43 $ (.15) $ .53 Class B Common Stock $ .50 $ .65 $ (.23) $ .80 Earnings per share were calculated using the following number of shares: Basic: Class A Common Stock 10,901,962 10,904,755 10,906,582 10,909,468 Class B Common Stock 12,001,793 12,001,793 12,001,793 12,001,793 Diluted: Class A Common Stock 10,950,796 10,977,776 10,906,582 10,957,745 Class B Common Stock 12,001,793 12,001,793 12,001,793 12,001,793
62 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (concluded) Quarter Ended, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, July 31, Oct. 31, 1997 1997 1997 1997 Net sales $152,370 $152,529 $167,062 $177,023 Gross profit $ 21,041 $ 17,608 $ 22,193 $ 24,47725,977 Net income $ 4,485 $ 3,580 $ 4,682 $ 5,339 Net incomeEarnings per share: Assuming distributions as actually paid out in dividends and the balance as in liquidation:Basic: Class A Common Stock $.14 $.12 $.18 $.20$ .16 $ .12 $ .16 $ .18 Class B Common Stock $.25 $.18 $.24 $.26 Quarter Ended, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, July 31, Oct. 31, 1996 1996 1996 1996 Net sales $159,743 $159,212 $155,994 $162,419 Gross profit $ 32,309.23 $ 26,051.19 $ 27,129.24 $ 36,104 Net income $ 10,826 $ 6,579 $ 9,636 $ 15,706 Net income per share: Assuming distributions as actually paid out in dividends and the balance as in liquidation:.28 Diluted: Class A Common Stock $.41 $.27 $.40 $.67$ .16 $ .12 $ .16 $ .18 Class B Common Stock $.52 $.31 $.44 $.71$ .23 $ .19 $ .24 $ .28 Earnings per share were calculated using the following number of shares: Basic: Class A Common Stock 10,873,172 10,873,172 10,874,038 10,892,550 Class B Common Stock 12,001,793 12,001,793 12,001,793 12,001,793 Diluted: Class A Common Stock 10,889,792 10,886,060 10,883,518 10,925,198 Class B Common Stock 12,001,793 12,001,793 12,001,793 12,001,793
Prior quarter earnings per share amounts have been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 128 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The earnings per share were reported as $.39 and $.44 for the Class A and Class B Common Stock, respectively, for the quarter ended January 31, 1998, $.52 and $.58 for the Class A and Class B Common Stock, respectively, for the quarter ended April 30, 1998 and $(.23) and $(.17) for the Class A and Class B Common Stock, respectively, for the quarter ended July 31, 1998. The amounts have been adjusted to the amounts reported above to reflect the use of the "two-class method", as defined by SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share". Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure There has not been a change in the Company's principal independent accountants and there were no matters of disagreement on accounting and financial disclosure. 4763 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant Information with respect to Directors of the Company and disclosures pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Proxy Statement, which Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days of October 31, 1997.1998. Information regarding the executive officers of the Registrant may be found under the caption "Executive Officers of the Company" in Part I, and is also incorporated by reference into this Item 10. Item 11. Executive Compensation Information with respect to Executive Compensation is incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Proxy Statement, which Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days of October 31, 1997.1998. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Information with respect to Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management is incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Proxy Statement, which Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days of October 31, 1997.1998. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Information with respect to Certain Relationships and Related Transactions is incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Proxy Statement, which Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days of October 31, 1997.1998. 4864 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial StatementsItem 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report: Page (1) Financial Statements: Consolidated Statements of Income for the three years ended October 31, 1997 261998 33 Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 1998 and 1997 and 1996 27-2834-35 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended October 31, 1997 291998 36 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the three years ended October 31, 1997 301998 37 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 31-4338-58 Report of Management's Responsibilities 4459 Report of Independent Accountants 4560 Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) 4661-62 (2) Financial StatementsStatement Schedules: Report of Independent Accountants on Financial Statement Schedules 5370 Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves (Schedule II) 5471
4965 Item 14. Exhibits, Financial StatementsStatement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K (continued)
(3) Exhibits: If Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit Document with which Exhibit was No. Description of Exhibit Previously Filed with SEC 2(a) Stock Purchase Agreement Current Report on Form 8-K dated dated March 30, 1998, April 14, 1998, File No. 1-566 between Greif Bros. (see Exhibit 2 therein). Corporation and Sonoco Products Company. 2(b) Joint Venture Agreement Current Report on Form 8-K dated dated as of November 1, November 13, 1998, File No. 1-566 1998, among CorrChoice, (see Ehibit 2 therein). Inc., Greif Bros. Corporation, Geoffrey A. Jollay and R. Dean Jollay, and John J. McLaughlin. 3(a) Amended and Restated Contained herein.Annual Report on Form 10-K for Certificate of Incorporation the fiscal year ended October 31, of Greif Bros. Corporation. 1997, File No. 1-566 (see Exhibit 3(a) therein). 3(b) Amended and Restated By-Laws Annual Report on Form 10-K for of ContainedGreif Bros. Corporation. the fiscal year ended October 31, 1997, File No. 1-566 (see Exhibit 3(b) therein). 3(c) Amendment to Amended and Included herein. Restated By-Laws of Greif Bros. Corporation. 10(a) Greif Bros. Corporation 1996 Registration Statement on Form Directors'S- Directors Stock Option Plan S-8,Plan. 8, File No. 333-26977 (see Exhibit 4(b) therein). 10(b) Greif Bros. Corporation Contained Herein.Annual Report on Form 10-K for Incentive Stock Option Plan, fiscal year ended October 31, as Amended and Restated. 111997, File No. 1-566 (see Exhibit 10(b) therein). 10(c) Greif Bros. Corporation Included herein. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. 10(d) Employment Agreement between Included herein. Michael J. Gasser and Greif Bros. Corporation. 66 Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Re: ComputationSchedules and Reports on Form 8-K (continued) If Incorporated be Reference, Exhibit Document with which Exhibit was No. Description of ContainedExhibit Previously Filed with SEC 10(e) Employment Agreement between Included herein. Per Share Earnings.William B. Sparks and Greif Bros. Corporation. 10(f) Employment Agreement, as Included herein. amended, between Charles R. Chandler and Greif Bros. Corporation. 10(g) Employment Agreement, as Included herein. amended, between Joseph W. Reed and Greif Bros. Corporation. 10(h) Credit Agreement dated as of Current Report on Form 8-K for March 30, 1998, among Greif April 14, 1998, File No. 1-566 Bros. Corporation, as (see Exhibit 99(b) therein). Borrower, Various Financial Institutions, as Banks, and KeyBank National Association, As Agent. 21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Contained herein. Registrant. 23 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP. Contained herein. PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP. 24(a) Powers of Attorney for Annual Report on Form 10-K for Michael J. Contained herein. Gasser, Charles the fiscal year ended October 31, R. Chandler, Michael H. 1997, File No. 1-566 (see Exhibit Dempsey, Naomi C. Dempsey, 24(a) therein). Daniel J. Gunsett, Allan Hull, Robert C. Macauley, David J. Olderman, William B. Sparks, Jr., and J Maurice Struchen. 27 Financial Data Schedule.Schedule Contained herein.
5067 Item 14. Exhibits, Financial StatementsStatement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K (concluded) (b) Reports on Form 8-K (1) No reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the last quarter of fiscal 1997.1998. All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto. The individual financial statements of the Registrant have been omitted since the Registrant is primarily an operating company and all subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements, in the aggregate, do not have minority equity interests and/or indebtedness to any person other than the Registrant or its consolidated subsidiaries in amounts which exceed 5% of total consolidated assets at October 31, 1997, except indebtedness incurred in the ordinary course of business which is not in default.1998. 5168 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Greif Bros. Corporation (Registrant) Date January 26, 199825, 1999 By /s/ Michael J. Gasser Michael J. Gasser Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. /s/ Michael J. Gasser /s/ Joseph W. Reed Michael J. Gasser Joseph W. Reed Chairman of the Board of Directors Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer Secretary (principal executive officer) (principal financial officer) /s/ John K. Dieker Charles R. Chandler * John K. Dieker Charles R. Chandler Corporate Controller Member of the Board of Directors (principal accounting officer) Michael H. Dempsey * Naomi C. Dempsey * Michael H. Dempsey Naomi C. Dempsey Member of the Board of Directors Member of the Board of Directors Daniel J. Gunsett * Allan HullRobert C. Macauley * Daniel J. Gunsett Allan HullRobert C. Macauley Member of the Board of Directors Member of the Board of Directors Robert C. MacauleyDavid J. Olderman * William B. Sparks, Jr. * David J. Olderman * Robert C. Macauley David J. OldermanWilliam B. Sparks, Jr. Member of the Board of Directors Member of the Board of Directors William B. Sparks, Jr.J Maurice Struchen * J Maurice Struchen * William B. Sparks, Jr. J Maurice Struchen Member of the Board of Directors Member of the Board of Directors [Signatures continued on the next page] 5269 SIGNATURES (concluded) * The undersigned, Michael J. Gasser, by signing his name hereto, does hereby execute this Annual Report on Form 10-K on behalf of each of the above-named persons pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by such persons and filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. By /s/ Michael J. Gasser Michael J. Gasser Chairman of the Board of Directors Chief Executive Officer Each of the above signatures is affixed as of January 26, 1998.25, 1999. 5370 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES To the Board of Directors of Greif Bros. Corporation Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated November 26, 1997, except as to Note 9, which is as of December 10, 1997,4, 1998, appearing on page 4560 of this Form 10-K also included an audit of the Financial Statement Schedules listed in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, these Financial Statement Schedules present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. /s/ Price WaterhousePricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Columbus, Ohio November 26, 1997, except as to Note 9, which is as of December 10, 19974, 1998 5471 SCHEDULE II GREIF BROS. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES (IN $000)
Charged Charged Balance Balance at Balanceto to at Charged to Charged toBeginning Costs and Other End of Description of Period Expenses Accounts Deductions Period Year ended October 31, 1995: Reserves deducted from applicable assets: For doubtful items- trade accounts receivables $ 989 $ 536 $37 (A) $773 (B) $ 789 For doubtful items- other notes and accounts receivable 697 -0- -0- -0- 697 Total reserves deducted from applicable assets $1,686 $ 536 $37 $773 $1,486 Year ended October 31, 1996: Reserves deducted from applicable assets: For doubtful items- trade accounts receivables $ 789 $ 201$201 $22 (A)B $186 (B)C $ 826 For doubtful items- other notes and accounts receivable 697 -0- -0- -0- 697 Total reserves deducted from applicable assets $1,486 $ 201$201 $22 $186 $1,523 Year ended October 31, 1997: Reserves deducted from applicable assets: For doubtful items- trade accounts receivables $ 826 $ 431$431 $11 (A)B $421 (B) $ 847C $847 For doubtful items- other notes and accounts receivable 697 -0- -0- -0- 697 Total reserves deducted from applicable assets $1,523 $431 $11 $421 $1,544 (A) Collections ofYear ended October 31, 1998: Reserves deducted from applicable assets: For doubtful items- trade accounts previously written-off.receivables $1,652 A $1,489 $142 B $365 C $2,918 For doubtful items- other notes and accounts receivable 697 -0- -0- -0- 697 Total reserves deducted from applicable assets $2,349 $1,489 $142 $365 $3,615
[FN] (A) Includes an $805,000 adjustment related to the industrial containers business of Sonoco Products Company which was acquired on March 30, 1998. [FN] (B) Collections of accounts previously written-off. [FN] (C) Accounts written-off. 5572 EXHIBIT INDEX
If Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit Document with which Exhibit was No. Description of Exhibit Previously filedFiled with SEC 2(a) Stock Purchase Agreement Current Report on Form 8-K dated dated March 30, 1998, April 14, 1998, File No. 1-566 between Greif Bros. (see Exhibit 2 therein). Corporation and Sonoco Products Company. 2(b) Joint Venture Agreement Current Report on Form 8-K dated dated as of November 1, November 13, 1998, File No. 1-566 1998, among CorrChoice, (see Exhibit 2 therein). Inc., Greif Bros. Corporation, Geoffrey A. Jollay and R. Dean Jollay, and John J. McLaughlin. 3(a) Amended and Restated Contained herein.Annual Report on Form 10-K for Certificate of Incorporation the fiscal year ended October 31, of Greif Bros. Corporation. 1997, File No. 1-566 (see Exhibit 3(b) therein). 3(b) Amended and Restated By-Laws Annual Report on Form 10-K for of ContainedGreif Bros. Corporation. the fiscal year ended October 31, 1997, File No. 1-566 (see Exhibit 3(b) therein). 3(c) Amendment to Amended and Included herein. Restated By-Laws of Greif Bros. Corporation. 10(a) Greif Bros. Corporation 1996 Registration Statement on Form Directors'S- Directors Stock Option Plan. S-8,8, File No. 333-26977 (see Exhibit 4(b) therein). 10(b) Greif Bros. Corporation Contained herein.Annual Report on Form 10-K for Incentive Stock Option Plan, the fiscal year ended October 31, as Amended and Restated. 11 Statement Re: Computation1997, File No. 1-566 (see Exhibit 10(b) therein). 10(c) Greif Bros. Corporation Included herein. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. 10(d) Employment Agreement between Included herein. Michael J. Gasser and Greif Bros. Corporation. 73 EXHIBIT INDEX (concluded) If Incorporated by Reference, Exhibit Document with which Exhibit was No. Description of ContainedExhibit Previously Filed with SEC 10(e) Employment Agreement between Included herein. Per Share Earnings.William B. Sparks and Greif Bros. Corporation. 10(f) Employment Agreement, as Included herein. amended, between Charles R. Chandler and Greif Bros. Corporation 10(g) Employment Agreement, as Included herein. amended, between Joseph W. Reed and Greif Bros. Corporation. 10(h) Credit Agreement dated as of Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 1998, among Greif April 14, 1998, File No. 1-566 Bros. Corporation, as (see Exhibit 99(b) therein). Borrower, Various Financial Institutions, as Banks, and KeyBank National Association, As Agent. 21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Contained herein. Registrant. 23 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP. Contained herein. PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP. 24(a) Powers of Attorney for Annual Report on Form 10-K for Michael Contained herein. J. Gasser, Charles the fiscal year ended october 31, R. Chandler, Michael H. 1997, File No. 1-566 (see Ehxibit Dempsey, Naomi C. Dempsey, 24(a) therein). Daniel J. Gunsett, Allan Hull, Robert C. Macauley, David J. Olderman, William B. Sparks, Jr., and J Maurice Struchen. 27 Financial Data Schedule.Schedule Contained herein.