0000047217 us-gaap:ForeignExchangeContractMember us-gaap:CashFlowHedgingMember us-gaap:CostOfSalesMember 2016-11-01 2017-10-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| | | | | | | | |
| (Mark One) | | |
| ☒ | | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended |
October 31, 20192020 |
| Or |
| ☐ | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from to |
| Commission file number |
1-4423
|
HP INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Delaware | | 94-1081436
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. employer identification no.)
|
| 1501 Page Mill Road | | 94304
|
| Palo Alto, | California | | (Zip code)
|
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | |
(650) (650) 857-1501
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
____________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s)
| Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common stock, par value $0.01 per share | HPQ | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes Yes☒☐ No ☐☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | ☒
| Accelerated filer | ☐ | Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was $30,007,738,276$22,154,410,824 based on the last sale price of common stock on April 30, 2019.2020.
The number of shares of HP Inc. common stock outstanding as of November 30, 20192020 was 1,453,187,4841,289,636,312 shares.
|
| | | | | | | |
| DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE |
| DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION | | 10-K PART |
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement related to its 20202021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after Registrant’s fiscal year end of October 31, 20192020 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report. | | III |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year ended October 31, 20192020
Table of Contents
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Page |
| | Page |
| | |
| PART I | |
| Item 1. | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| PART II | |
| Item 5. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| PART III | |
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| PART IV | |
| Item 15. | | |
| Item 16. | | |
In this report on Form 10-K, for all periods presented, “we”, “us”, “our”, the “company”, the “Company”, “HP” and “HP Inc.” refer to HP Inc. (formerly Hewlett-Packard Company) and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Business” in Item 1 and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7, contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations and assumptions that involve risks uncertainties and assumptions.uncertainties. If the risks or uncertainties ever materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, the results of HP Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (“HP”) may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, any statements regarding the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the actions by governments, businesses and individuals in response to the situation; projections of net revenue, margins, expenses, effective tax rates, net earnings, net earnings per share, cash flows, benefit plan funding, deferred taxes, share repurchases, foreign currency exchange rates or other financial items; any projections of the amount, timing or impact of cost savings or restructuring and other charges;charges, planned structural cost reductions and productivity initiatives; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, including, but not limited to, our business model and transformation, our sustainability goals, our go-to-market strategy the execution of restructuring plans and any resulting cost savings, net revenue or profitability improvements;improvements or other financial impacts; any statements concerning the expected development, performance, market share or competitive performance relating to products or services; any statements regarding current or future macroeconomic trends or events and the impact of those trends and events on HP and its financial performance; any statements regarding pending investigations, claims or disputes; any statements of expectation or belief, including with respect to the timing and expected benefits of acquisitions and other business combination and investment transactions; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements can also generally be identified by words such as “future,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “projects,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “can,” “may,” and similar terms. Risks, uncertainties and assumptions include factors relating to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the actions by governments, businesses and individuals in response to the situation, the effects of which may give rise to or amplify the risks associated with many of these factors listed here; HP’s ability to execute on its strategic plan, including the previously announced initiatives, business model changes and transformation; execution of planned structural cost reductions and productivity initiatives; HP’s ability to complete any contemplated share repurchases, other capital return programs or other strategic transactions; the need to address the many challenges facing HP’s businesses; the competitive pressures faced by HP’s businesses; risks associated with executing HP’s strategy and business model changes and transformation; successfully innovating, developing and executing HP’s go-to-market strategy, including online, omnichannel and contractual sales, in an evolving distribution and reseller landscape; the development and transition of new products and services and the enhancement of existing products and services to meet customer needs and respond to emerging technological trends; successfully competing and maintaining the value proposition of HP’s products, including supplies; the need to manage third-party suppliers, manage HP’s global, multi-tier distribution network, limit potential misuse of pricing programs by HP’s channel partners, adapt to new or changing marketplaces and effectively deliver HP’s services; challenges to HP’s ability to accurately forecast inventories, demand and pricing, which may be due to HP’s multi-tiered channel, sales of HP’s products to unauthorized resellers or unauthorized resale of HP’s products; integration and other risks associated with business combination and investment transactions; the results of the restructuring plans, including estimates and assumptions related to the cost (including any possible disruption of HP’s business) and the anticipated benefits of the restructuring plans; the protection of HP’s intellectual property assets, including intellectual property licensed from third parties; the hiring and retention of key employees;the impact of macroeconomic and geopolitical trends and events; risks associated with HP’s international operations; the execution and performance of contracts by HP and its suppliers, customers, clients and partners; disruptions in operations from system security risks, data protection breaches, cyberattacks, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics or pandemics such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and other natural or manmade disasters or catastrophic events; the impact of changes in tax laws, including uncertainties related to the interpretationlaws; potential impacts, liabilities and application of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 on HP’s tax obligations and effective tax rate; the resolution ofcosts from pending or potential investigations, claims and disputes; and other risks that are described herein, including but not limited to the items discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report and that are otherwise described or updated from time to time in HP’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“(the “SEC”). The forward-looking statements in this report are made as of the SEC”).date of this filing and HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.
PART I
ITEM 1. Business.
Business Overview
We are a leading global provider of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, solutions and services. We sell to individual consumers, small- and medium-sized businesses (“SMBs”) and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health and education sectors.
HP was incorporated in 1947 under the laws of the state of California as the successor to a partnership founded in 1939 by William R. Hewlett and David Packard. Effective in May 1998, we changed our state of incorporation from California to Delaware.
As part of the separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“Hewlett Packard Enterprise”), Hewlett-Packard Company’s former enterprise technology infrastructure, software, services and financing businesses (the “Separation”) on November 1, 2015, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise entered into a separation and distribution agreement, an employee matters agreement and various other agreements which remain enforceable that provide a framework for the continuing relationships between the parties.
HP Products and Services; Segment Information
We have three reportable segments: Personal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments. The Personal Systems segment offers commercial and consumer desktop and notebook personal computers (“PCs”), workstations, thin clients, commercial mobility devices, retail point-of-sale (“POS”) systems, displays and other related accessories, software, support and services. The Printing segment provides consumer and commercial printer hardware, supplies, solutionsservices and services,solutions, as well as scanning devices. Corporate Investments includes HP Labs and certain business incubation and investment projects.
In each of the past three fiscal years, notebook PCs, printing supplies and desktop PCs each accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net revenue.
Personal Systems
Personal Systems offers commercial and consumer desktop and notebook PCs, workstations, thin clients, commercial mobility devices, retail POS systems, displays and other related accessories, software, support and services. We group commercial notebooks, commercial desktops, commercial services, commercial mobility devices, commercial detachables and convertibles, workstations, retail POS systems and thin clients into commercial PCs and consumer notebooks, consumer desktops, consumer services and consumer detachables into consumer PCs when describing performance in these markets. Both commercial and consumer PCs maintain a multi-operating system, multi-architecture strategies using Microsoft Windows, Google Chrome, Android operating systems and use predominantly processors from Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”).
Commercial PCs are optimized for use by enterprise, public sector which includes education, and SMB customers, with a focus on robust designs, security, serviceability, connectivity, reliability and manageability in networked and cloud-based environments. Commercial PCs include the HP ProBook and HP EliteBook lines of notebooks, convertibles, and detachables, the HP Pro and HP Elite lines of business desktops and all-in-ones, retail POS systems, HP Thin Clients, HP Pro Tablet PCs and the HP notebook, desktop and Chromebook systems. Commercial PCs also include workstations that are designed and optimized for high-performance and demanding application environments including Z desktop workstations, Z all-in-ones and Z mobile workstations. Additionally, we offer a range of services and solutions to enterprise, public sector and SMB customers to help them manage the lifecycle of their PC and mobility installed base.
Consumer PCs are optimized for consumer usage, focusing on gaming, learning and working remotely, consuming multi-media for entertainment, managing personal life activities, staying connected, sharing information, getting things done for work including creating content, staying informed and security.secure. These systems include HP Spectre, HP Envy, HP Pavilion, HP Chromebook, HP Stream, Omen by HP lines of notebooks and hybrids and HP Envy, HP Pavilion desktops and all-in-one lines, and Omen by HP desktops.
Personal Systems groups its global business capabilities into the following business units when reporting business performance:
•Notebooks consists of consumer notebooks, commercial notebooks, mobile workstations and commercial mobility devices;
| |
• | • Desktopsincludes consumer desktops, commercial desktops, thin clients, and retail POS systems; • Workstations consists of desktop workstations and accessories; and • includes consumer desktops, commercial desktops, thin clients, and retail POS systems; |
| |
• | Workstations consists of desktop workstations and accessories; and
|
| |
• | Other consists of consumer and commercial services as well as other Personal Systems capabilities. |
Printing
Printing provides consumer and commercial printer hardware, supplies, solutionsservices and services, as well as scanning devices.solutions. Printing is also focused on Graphics and 3D imaging solutions in the commercial and industrial markets. HP goes to market through its extensive channel network and directly with HP sales. Our global business capabilities within Printing are described below:
Office Printing Solutions delivers HP’s office printers, supplies, services, and solutions to SMBs and large enterprises. It also includes some Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (“Samsung”)-branded and Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) hardware and solutions. HP goes to market through its extensive channel networksolutions, and directly with HP sales.some Samsung-branded supplies.
Home Printing Solutions delivers innovative printing products, supplies, services and solutions for the home, home business and micro business customers utilizing both HP’s Ink and Laser technologies (including laser technology fromtechnologies. It also includes some Samsung-branded products).supplies.
Graphics Solutions delivers large-format, commercial and industrial solutions and supplies to print service providers and packaging converters through a wide portfolio of printers and presses (HP DesignJet, HP Latex, HP Stitch, HP Indigo and HP PageWide Web Presses) and related components..
3D Printing and Digital Manufacturing offers a portfolio of additive manufacturing solutions and supplies to help customers succeed in their additive and digital manufacturing journey. HP offers complete solutions in collaboration with an ecosystem of partners.
Printing groups its global business capabilities into the following business units when reporting business performance:
| |
• | Commercial Hardware consists of office printing solutions, graphics solutions and 3D Printing and Digital Manufacturing, excluding supplies;
|
| |
• | Consumer Hardware consists of home printing solutions, excluding supplies; and
|
| |
• | Supplies comprises a set of highly innovative consumable products, ranging from ink and laser cartridges to media, graphics supplies and 3D Printing and Digital Manufacturing•Commercial Hardware consists of office printing solutions, graphics solutions and 3D printing and digital manufacturing, excluding supplies; •Consumer Hardware consists of home printing solutions, excluding supplies; and •Supplies comprises a set of highly innovative consumable products, ranging from ink and laser cartridges to media, graphics supplies and 3D printing and digital manufacturing supplies, for recurring use in consumer and commercial hardware. |
Corporate Investments
Corporate Investments includes HP Labs and certain business incubation and investment projects.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
We manage our business and report our financial results based on the business segments described above. Our customers are organized by consumer and commercial groups, and purchases of HP products, solutions and services may be fulfilled directly by HP or indirectly through a variety of partners, utilizing their own physical or internet stores or an omnichannel combination of the two, including:
•retailers that sell our products to the public through their own physical or internet stores;focusing on consumers and small- and medium-sized businesses;
•resellers that sell our products and services, frequently with their own value-added products or services, to targeted customer groups;
•distribution partners that supply our products and solutions to resellers; and
•system integrators and other business intermediaries that provide various levels of services, including systems integration work and as-a-service solutions, and typically partner with us on client solutions that require our products and services.
The mix of our business conducted by direct sales or channel sales differs by business and geographic market. We believe that customer buying patterns and different geographic market conditions require us to tailor our sales, marketing and distribution efforts to the geographic market and sub-geographic specificities for each of our businesses. We are focused on driving the depth and breadth of our market coverage while identifying efficiencies and productivity gains in both our direct and indirect routes to market. Our businesses collaborate to accomplish strategic and process alignment where appropriate. For example, we typically assign an account manager to manage relationships across our business with large enterprise customers. The account manager is supported by a team of specialists with product and services expertise and drives both direct and indirect sales to their assigned customers. For other customers and for consumers, we typically manage both direct online sales as well as channel relationships with retailers mainly targeting consumers and small businesses and commercial resellers mainly targeting SMBs and mid-market accounts.
Manufacturing and Materials
We utilize a significant number of outsourced manufacturers (“OMs”) around the world to manufacture HP-designed products. The use of OMs is intended to generate cost efficiencies and reduce time to market for HP-designed products. We use multiple OMs to maintain flexibility in our supply chain and manufacturing processes. In some circumstances, third-party suppliers produce products that we purchase and resell under the HP brand. Additionally, we manufacture finished products from components and sub-assemblies that we acquire from a wide range of vendors.
We utilize two primary methods of fulfilling demand for products: building products to order and configuring products to order. We build products to order to maximize manufacturing and logistics efficiencies by producing high volumes of basic product configurations. Alternatively, configuring products to order enables units to match a customer’s hardware and software customization requirements. Our inventory management and distribution practices in both building products to order and configuring products to order seek to minimize inventory holding periods by taking delivery of the inventory and manufacturing shortly before the sale or distribution of products to our customers.
We purchase materials, supplies and product sub-assemblies from a substantial number of vendors. For most of our products, we have existing alternate sources of supply or alternate sources of supply are readily available. However, we have relied on sole sources for some laser printer engines, LaserJet supplies, certain customized parts and parts for products with short life cycles (although some of these sources have operations in multiple locations, mitigating the effect of a disruption). For instance, we source the majority of our A4 and a portion of A3 portfolio laser printer engines and laser toner cartridges
from Canon. Any decision by either party not to renew our agreement with Canon or to limit or reduce the scope of the agreement could adversely affect our net revenue from LaserJet products; however, we have a long-standing business relationship with Canon and anticipate renewal of this agreement.
We are dependent upon Intel and AMD as suppliers of x86 processors and Microsoft for various software products. We believe that disruptions with these suppliers would have industry-wide ramifications, and therefore would not disproportionately disadvantage us relative to our competitors. See “Risk Factors—We depend on third-party suppliers, and our financial results could suffer if we fail to manage our suppliers effectively,”effectively” in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Like other participants in the information technology (“IT”) industry, we ordinarily acquire materials and components through a combination of blanket and scheduled purchase orders to support our demand requirements for periods averaging 90 to 120 days. From time to time, we may experience significant price volatility or supply constraints for certain components that are not available from multiple sources. We also may acquire component inventory in anticipation of supply constraints or enter into longer-term pricing commitments with vendors to improve the priority, price and availability of supplies. See “Risk Factors—We depend on third-party suppliers, and our financial results could suffer if we fail to manage our suppliers effectively,”effectively” in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Sustainability also plays an important role in the manufacturing and sourcing of materials and components for our products. We strive to make our products in an ethical and sustainable manner. We have committed to building an efficient, resilient and sustainable supplier network, and we collaborate with our suppliers to improve their labor practices and working conditions, and to reduce the environmental impact of their operations. These actions, together with our broader sustainability program, help us in our effort to meet customer sustainability requirements and comply with regulations, for example, regarding supplier labor practices and conflict minerals disclosures. For more information on our sustainability goals, programs, and performance, we refer you to our annual sustainability report, available on our website (which is not incorporated by reference herein).
International
Our products and services are available worldwide. We believe this geographic diversity allows us to meet both consumer and enterprise customers’ demand on a worldwide basis and draws on business and technical expertise from a worldwide workforce. This provides stability to our operations, provides revenue streams that may offset geographic economic trends and offers us an opportunity to access new markets for maturing products. In addition, we believe that future growth is dependent in part on our ability to develop products and sales models that target developing countries. In this regard, we believe that our broad geographic presence as well as our focus on diversity and inclusion, gives us a solid base on which to build future growth.
Research and Development
Innovation across products, services, business models and processes is a key element of our culture. Our development efforts are focused on designing and developing products, services and solutions that anticipate customers’ changing needs and desires, and emerging technological trends. Our efforts also are focused on identifying the areas where we believe we can make a unique contribution and the areas where partnering with other leading technology companies will leverage our cost structure and maximize our customers’ experiences.
HP Labs, together with the various research and development groups within our business segments, is responsible for our research and development efforts. HP Labs is part of our Corporate Investments segment.
We anticipate that we will continue to have significant research and development expenditures in the future to support the design and development of innovative, high-quality products and services to maintain and enhance our competitive position.
For a discussion of risks attendant to our research and development activities, see “Risk Factors—If we cannot successfully execute our strategy and continue to develop, manufacture and market innovative products and services, our business and financial performance may suffer,”suffer” in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Patents
Our general policy has been to seek patent protection for those inventions likely to be incorporated into our products and services or where obtaining such proprietary rights will improve our competitive position. At October 31, 2019,2020, our worldwide patent portfolio included over 27,00028,000 patents.
Patents generally have a term of twenty years from the date they are filed. As our patent portfolio has been built over time, the remaining terms of the individual patents across our patent portfolio vary. We believe that our patents and patent applications are important for maintaining the competitive differentiation of our products and services, enhancing our freedom of action to sell our products and services in markets in which we choose to participate, and maximizing our return on research and development investments. No single patent is essential to HP as a whole or to any of HP’s business segments.
In addition to developing our patent portfolio, we license intellectual property (“IP”) from third parties as we deem appropriate. We have also granted and continue to grant to others licenses, and other rights, under our patents when we consider these arrangements to be in our interest. These license arrangements include a number of cross-licenses with third parties.
For a discussion of risks attendant to IP rights, see “Risk Factors—Our financial performance may suffer if we cannot continue to develop, license or enforce the intellectual property rights on which our businesses depend”, “Risk Factors—Our products and services depend in part on IP and technology licensed from third parties” and “Risk Factors—Third-party claims of IP infringement are commonplace in our industry and successful third-party claims may limit or disrupt our ability to sell our products and services” in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Backlog
We believe that backlog is not a meaningful indicator of future business prospects due to our diverse products and services portfolio, including the large volume of products delivered from finished goods or channel partner inventories and the shortening of some product life cycles.
Seasonality
General economic conditions have an impact on our business and financial results. From time to time, the markets in which we sell our products and services experience weak economic conditions that may negatively affect sales. We experience some seasonal trends in the sale of our products and services. For example, European sales are often weaker in the summer months and consumer sales are often stronger in the fourth calendar quarter. Demand during the spring and early summer months also may be adversely impacted by market anticipation of seasonal trends. See “Risk Factors—Our uneven sales cycle makes planning and inventory management difficult and future financial results less predictable,” in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Competition
We encounter strong competition in all areas of our business activity. We compete on the basis of technology, innovation, performance, price, quality, reliability, brand, reputation, distribution, range of products and services, ease of use of our products, account relationships, customer training, service and support, security, availability of application software and internet infrastructure offerings, and our sustainability performance.
The markets for each of our key business segments are characterized by strong competition among major corporations with long-established positions and a large number of new and rapidly growing firms. Most product life cycles are short, and to remain competitive we must develop new products and services, periodically enhance our existing products and services and compete effectively on the basis of the factors listed above. In addition, we compete with many of our current and potential partners, including OEMs that design, manufacture and often market their products under their own brand names. Our successful management of these competitive partner relationships will be critical to our future success. Moreover, we anticipate that we will have to continue to adjust prices on many of our products and services to stay competitive.
We have a broad technology portfolio spanning personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing-related products and services. We are the leader or among the leaders in each of our key business segments.
The competitive environment in which each key segment operates is described below:
Personal Systems. The markets in which Personal Systems operates are highly competitive and are characterized by price competition and introduction of new products and solutions. The PC market units showed marginal growth. Our primary competitors are Lenovo Group Limited, Dell Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Acer Inc., ASUSTeK Computer Inc., Apple Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. In particular geographies, we also experience competition from local companies and from generically-branded or “white box” manufacturers. Our competitive advantages include our broad product portfolio, our innovation and research and development capabilities including security features, our designs,innovative design work, our brand and procurement leverage, our ability to cross-sell our portfolio of offerings, our extensive service and support offerings and the accessibility of our products through a broad-based distribution strategy from retail and commercial channels to direct sales.
Printing. The markets for printer hardware and associated supplies are highly competitive. Printing’s key customer segments each face competitive market pressures in pricing and the introduction of new products. Our primary competitors include Canon Inc., Lexmark International, Inc., Xerox Corporation Ltd., Seiko Epson Corporation, The Ricoh Company Ltd. and Brother Industries, Ltd. In addition, independent suppliers offer non-original supplies (including imitation, refill and
remanufactured alternatives), which are often available for lower prices but which can also offer lower print quality and reliability compared to HP original inkjet and toner supplies. These and other competing products are often sold alongside our products through online or omnichannel resellers or distributors, or such resellers and distributors may highlight the availability of lower cost non-original supplies. Our competitive advantages include our comprehensive high-quality solutions for the home, office and publishing environments, our innovation and research and development capabilities including security features, sustainability, our brand, and the accessibility of our products through a broad-based distribution strategy from retail and commercial channels to direct sales.
For a discussion of risks attendant to these competitive factors, see “Risk Factors—We operate in an intensely competitive industry and competitive pressures could harm our business and financial performance,” in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Sustainability
At HP, we believe in the power of technology to enable people and communities to change the world for the better. Sustainable impact is fundamental to our reinvention journey-fuelingjourney, fueling our innovation and growth, strengthening our business for the long term and enabling us to develop and deliver the best solutions to our customers.
Our approach covers a broad range of sustainability issues across three pillars: Planet, People and Community. We prioritize issues to address based on their relative importance to our culture, business success and sustainable development.
Planet. We aim to grow our business, not our footprint, - and support our customers to do the same by transforming our entire business to drive a more efficient, circular, and low-carbon economy and by enabling our customers to invent the future through our most sustainable portfolio of products and services.
People. We champion dignity, respect and empowerment for all people with whom we work, by workingand strive to respect human rights and embed diversity and inclusion in everything we do and helpingdo. We are committed to doing our part to enable all people who help bring our products to market to thrive at work, at home and in their communities.
Community. Through our technology, time and resources, we work to catalyze positive change in communities where we live, work and do business. As a result, we aim to unlock educational and economic opportunity through the power of technology and improve the vitality and resilience of our local communities.
Goals. Our current long-term sustainability goals are:
Planet
•Use 30% post-consumer recycled content plastic (“RCP”) across our personal systems and print portfolio by 2025 (which refers to RCP as a percentage of total plastic used in all HP personal systems, printer hardware, and print cartridges shipped during the reporting year);
•Eliminate 75% of single-use plastic packaging by 2025, compared to 2018. (Calculated as the percentage of primary plastic packaging (by weight) reduced per unit shipped).
•Use 100% renewable electricity in our global operations by 2035, with an interim goal of 60% by 2025;
•Consistent with a science-based reduction target in line with 1.5℃, reduce Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions in our global operations by 60% by 2025, compared to 2015;
•Reduce the GHG emissions intensity of HP’s product portfolio use (which refers to per unit GHG emissions during anticipated product lifetime use weighted by contribution of personal systems and printing products to overall revenue arising from the use of more than 99% of HP product units shipped each year) by 30% by 2025, compared to 2015;
•Reduce first-tier production supplier and product transportation-related GHG emissions intensity (which refers to the portion of first-tier production and product transportation suppliers’ reported GHG emissions attributable to HP divided by HP’s annual net revenue) by 10% by 2025, compared to 2015;
| |
•Help suppliers cut 2 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions between 2010 and 2025; • | Help suppliers cut 2 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions between 2010 and 2025;
|
Achieve zero deforestation associated with HP brand paper and paper-based product packaging (which includes the box that comes with the product and all paper inside the box) by 2020;
Recycle 1.2 million tonnes of hardware and supplies by 2025, since the beginning of 2016; and
•Reduce potable water consumption inacross global operations by 15%35% by 2025, compared to 2015;2015 with a focus on high risk sites;
People
•Double our number of Black and African American executives by 2025.
•Develop skills and improve well-being of 500,000 factory workers by 2025, since the beginning of 2015;
•Double factory participation in our supply chain sustainability programs by 2025, compared to 2015; and
•Maintain greater than 99% completion rate of annual Integrity at HP (formerly Standards of Business Conduct)Integrity@HP training among active HP employees and the Board of Directors.
Community
•Enable better learning outcomes for 100 million people by 2025, since the beginning of 2015;
•Enroll 1 million HP LIFE (Learning Initiative for Entrepreneurs) users between 2016 and 2025;
•Contribute $100 million in HP Foundation and employee community giving cumulatively by 2025 since the beginning of 2016; and
•Contribute 1.5 million employee volunteering hours cumulatively by 2025, since the beginning of 2016.
For more information on our sustainability goals, programs, and performance, we refer you to our annual sustainability report,Sustainable Impact Report, available on our website (which is not incorporated by reference herein).
Environment
Our operations are subject to regulation under various federal, state, local and foreign laws concerning the environment, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, and third-party damage or personal injury claims, if we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws.
Many of our products are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws governing chemical substances in products and their safe use, including laws regulating the manufacture and distribution of chemical substances and laws restricting the presence of certain substances in electronics products. Most of our products also are subject to requirements applicable to their energy consumption. In addition, we face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the chemical and materials composition of our products, and their safe use.
We proactively evaluate and at times replace materials in our products and supply chain, taking into account, among other things, published lists of substances of concern, new and upcoming legal requirements, customer preferences and scientific analysis that indicates a potential impact to human health or the environment.
We are also subject to legislation in an increasing number of jurisdictions that makes producers of electrical goods, including computers and printers, financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and future covered products (sometimes referred to as “product take-back legislation”). We are also subject to standards set by public and private entities related to sustainability issues such as energy consumption, reusing or recycling. We intend for our products to be easily reused and recycled, and we provide many of our customers with reuse and recycling programs.
In the event our products become non-compliant with these laws or standards, our products could be restricted from entering certain jurisdictions or from being procured by certain governments or private companies, and we could face other sanctions, including fines.
Our operations, supply chain and our products are expected to become increasingly subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and international treaties relating to climate change, such as carbon pricing or product energy efficiency requirements. As these and other new laws, regulations, treaties and similar initiatives and programs are adopted and implemented throughout the world, we will be required to comply or potentially face market access limitations or other sanctions, including fines. We strive to continually improve the energy and carbon efficiency of our operations, supply chain and product portfolio and deliver more cost-effective and less greenhouse gas-intensive technology solutions to our customers. We believe that technology will be fundamental to finding solutions to achieve compliance with and manage those requirements, and we are collaborating with industry, business groups and governments to find and promote ways that HP technology can be used to address climate change and to facilitate compliance with related laws, regulations and treaties.
We are committed to complying with all environmental laws applicable to our operations, products and services and to reducing our environmental impact across all aspects of our business. This commitment is reflected and outlined in our sustainability policy, our comprehensive environmental, health and safety policy, strict environmental management of our operations and worldwide environmental programs and services.
A liability for environmental remediation and other environmental costs is accrued when we consider it probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Environmental costs and accruals are presently not material to our operations, cash flows or financial position. Although there is no assurance that existing or future environmental laws applicable to our operations or products will not have a material adverse effect on our operations, cash flows or financial condition, we do not currently anticipate material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities.
For a discussion of risks attendant to these environmental factors, see “Risk Factors—Our business is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that could result in costs or other sanctions that adversely affect our business and results of operations,”operations” in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, for a discussion of our environmental contingencies see Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is also incorporated herein by reference.
Human Capital
HP’s approximately 53,000 employees worldwide power our innovation, contributing unique perspectives and a growth mindset to create breakthrough technologies and transformative solutions. We are committed to fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace that attracts and retains exceptional talent. Through ongoing employee development, comprehensive compensation and benefits, and a focus on health, safety and employee wellbeing, we strive to help our employees in all aspects of their lives so they can do their best work, every single day.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Innovation at HP comes from the diverse perspectives, knowledge, and experiences of our employees. We strive to create an inclusive workplace where people can bring their authentic selves to work.
Our commitment to diversity and inclusion starts at the top with a highly skilled and diverse board. We are among the top technology companies for women in executive positions. Women represent 29.6% of HP’s full-time executive positions and 32.3% of full-time director-level employees. We are committed to increasing representation of women at HP overall, but particularly in leadership and technical roles globally.
This focus also extends to underrepresented minorities in the United States. HP is committed to doubling the number of Black and African American executives by 2025.
Women represent 36.9% of HP’s worldwide employees and racial and ethnic minorities represent 28.9% of HP’s U.S. employees as of October 31, 2020. In 2020, 62.0% of our U.S. hires were from underrepresented groups, including women, U.S. Ethnicities, veterans and people with disabilities.
To ensure leadership maintains a strong focus on diversity and inclusion, each executive leader has individual performance goals under the Management by Objectives (“MBOs”) program tied to diversity and inclusion. The board also has ongoing oversight of diversity and inclusion programs.
For additional information regarding our diversity and inclusion programs, please see the section titled “Our Approach to Human Capital Management” in HP’s 2021 Proxy Statement.
Pay Equity
We believe people should be paid for what they do and how they do it, regardless of their gender, race, or other personal characteristics. To deliver on that commitment, we benchmark and set pay ranges based on market data and consider factors such as an employee’s role and experience, the location of their job, and their performance. We also regularly review our compensation practices, both in terms of our overall workforce and individual employees, to ensure our pay is fair and equitable.
For the past five years and with the support of independent third-party experts in this field, HP has reviewed the compensation of employees to ensure consistent pay practices by conducting a pay equity analysis annually comparing employees in the same role within a country/location.
HP expanded its annual pay equity assessment in 2020 - evaluating eight countries with our largest employee populations, representing 65% of our global workforce. The independent analysis found no systemic issues and any outliers were addressed as part of the normal off-cycle compensation review process.
Employee Engagement
We regularly collect feedback to better understand and improve the employee experience and identify opportunities to continually strengthen our culture. In 2020, 96% of employees participated in our annual employee survey. Last year we achieved highest level of employee engagement (top quartile). Employees’ highest rated areas were the following: diversity and inclusion (95%) and ethics and integrity (95%).
Training and Development
Human capital development underpins our efforts to execute our strategy and continue to develop, manufacture and market innovative products and services. We continually invest in our employees’ career growth and provide employees with a wide range of development opportunities, including face-to-face, virtual, social and self-directed learning, mentoring, coaching, and external development. In 2020, 98% of employees participated in learning and development activities.
Health, Safety and Wellness
The physical health, financial wellbeing, life balance and mental health of our employees is vital to HP’s success.
Our environmental, health, and safety leadership team uses our global injury and illness reporting system to assess trends regionally and worldwide as a part of quarterly reviews. Our manufacturing facilities continue to represent our most significant health and safety risks, due to higher potential exposure to chemicals and machinery related hazards. Managing and reducing risks at these facilities remains a focus, and injury rates continue to be low.
We also sponsor a global wellness program designed to enhance physical, financial, and mental wellbeing for all our employees around the world. Throughout the year, we encourage healthy behaviors through regular communications, educational sessions, voluntary progress tracking, wellness challenges, and other incentives.
Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have taken an integrated approach to helping our employees manage their work and personal responsibilities, with a strong focus on employee wellbeing, health and safety. Refer to "Our COVID-19 Response" included in Item 7, "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for information on actions taken by HP to support its employees during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Information about our Executive Officers
The following are our current executive officers:
Claire Bramley; age 42;43; Global Controller
Ms. Bramley has served as Global Controller since December 2018. Previously, Ms. Bramley served as the Regional Head of Finance for Europe-Middle East-Africa from June 2015 to December 2018 and Vice President of Worldwide Financial Planning and Analysis from May 2013 to June 2015.
Alex Cho; age 47;48; President, Personal Systems
Mr. Cho has served as President, Personal Systems since June 2018. From 2014 to 2018, Mr. Cho served as Global Head and General Manager of Commercial Personal Systems at Hewlett-Packard Company.Systems. Prior to that role, Mr. Cho served as the Vice President and General Manager of the LaserJet Supplies team from 2010 to 2014.
Steve Fieler; age 46; Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Fieler has served as Chief Financial Officer since July 2018. Previously, Mr. Fieler served as Head of Global Treasury from January 2017 to June 2018. Prior to that role, he was Chief Financial Officer at Proteus Digital Health from June 2014 to January 2017. Mr. Fieler served in a range of finance and operational roles at Hewlett-Packard Company prior to its separation, including Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of HP Software from January 2012 to June 2014.
Tracy S. Keogh; age 58;59; Chief Human Resources Officer
Ms. Keogh has served as Chief Human Resources Officer since November 2015. Previously, Ms. Keogh served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources of Hewlett-Packard Company from April 2011 to November 2015. Prior to joining Hewlett-Packard Company, Ms. Keogh served as Senior Vice President of Human Resources at Hewitt Associates, a provider of human resources consulting services, from May 2007 until March 2011.
Enrique Lores; age 54;55; President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Lores has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since November 2019. Throughout his 30-year tenure with the company, Mr. Lores held leadership positions across the organization, most recently serving as President, Printing, Solutions and Services from November 2015 to November 2019, and prior to that role, leading the Separation Management Office for HP Inc. Previously, Mr. Lores was the Senior Vice President and General Manager for Business Personal Systems. Before his Business Personal Systems role, Mr. Lores was Senior Vice President of Customer Support and Services.
Marie Myers; age 52; Acting Chief Financial Officer and Chief Transformation Officer
Ms. Myers has served as Acting Chief Financial Officer since October 2020 and as Chief Transformation Officer since June 2020. Previously she served as Chief Digital Officer from March 2020 to June 2020. Prior to rejoining HP, she was the Chief Financial Officer of UiPath, a robotic process automation company, from December 2018 to December 2019. Prior to UiPath, Ms. Myers served as Global Controller from December 2015 to December 2018 and finance lead during the separation of Hewlett-Packard Company into HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company from October 2014 to August 2015, in addition to other finance-related roles at Hewlett-Packard Company.
Kim Rivera; age 51;52; President, Strategy and Business Management and Chief Legal Officer
Ms. Rivera has served as President, Strategy and Business Management and Chief Legal Officer since January 2019. Previously, she served as Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel from November 2015 to January 2019. Prior to joining us, she served as the Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary at DaVita Health Care Partners where she was employed from 2010 to 2015. From 2006 to 2009, she served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel at The Clorox Company. Prior to that, Ms. Rivera served as Vice President Law and Chief Litigation Counsel to Rockwell Automation as well as General Counsel for its Automation Controls and Information Group.
Christoph Schell; age 48;49; Chief Commercial Officer
Mr. Schell has served as Chief Commercial Officer since November 2019. From November 2018 to October 2019, he served as the President of 3D Printing & Digital Manufacturing. Before that, he served as President of the Americas region from November 2015 to November 2018 and managed the Americas region for the HP Print and Personal Systems business from August 2014 to November 2015. Prior to rejoining HP in August 2014, Mr. Schell served as Executive Vice President of the Lighting business in Growth Markets at Philips. Prior to Philips, Mr. Schell held various roles at HP and Procter & Gamble.
Tuan Tran; age 52;53; President of Imaging, Printing and Solutions
Mr. Tran served as President of Imaging, Printing and Solutions since November 2019. Previously, he served as Global Head & General Manager of the Office Printing Solutions business from 2016 to November 2019, and Global Head & General Manager of the LaserJet and Enterprise Solutions business from 2014 to 2016.
Employees
We had approximately 56,000 employees worldwide as
Available Information
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge on our website at http://investor.hp.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after HP electronically files such reports with, or furnishes those reports to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. HP’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board of Directors’ committee charters (including the charters of the Audit Committee, Finance, Investment and Technology Committee, HR and Compensation Committee, and Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee) and code of ethics entitled “Integrity at HP” (none of which are incorporated by reference herein) are also available at that same location on our website. If the Board grants any waivers from Integrity at HP to any of our directors or executive officers, or if we amend
Integrity at HP, we will, if required, disclose these matters via updates to our website at http://investor.hp.com on a timely basis. We encourage investors to visit our website from time to time, as information is updated and new information is posted. The content of our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.
Stockholders may request free copies of these documents from:
HP Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
1501 Page Mill Road,
Palo Alto, CA 94304
http://investor.hp.com/resources/information-request/default.aspx
Additional Information
Microsoft® and Windows® are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Intel® is a trademark of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. AMD is a trademark of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Google™ and Google Chrome™ are trademarks of Google LLC. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.
The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be important for understanding any statement in this Form 10-K or elsewhere. The following information should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.
Because of the following factors, as well as other variables affecting our results of operations, past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.periods.
RisksSTRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL RISKS
Our business, results of operations and financial condition have been, and could continue to be, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the actions taken by governments, businesses and individuals in response to the pandemic have resulted in, and are expected to continue to result in, a substantial curtailment of business activities (including the decrease in demand for a broad variety of goods and services), weakened economic conditions, supply chain disruptions, significant economic uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets, both in the United States and abroad.
The COVID-19 pandemic is adversely impacting, and is expected to continue to adversely impact, our operations and financial performance. COVID-19 related restrictions impacted the demand for certain products and services as a result of temporary closures of offices and businesses and as people moved to spending more time at home, which negatively impacted sales for commercial products in both Personal Systems and Print. For as long as remote working and learning practices remain prevalent, whether due to restrictions implemented by governmental authorities or businesses allowing employees to continue to work remotely, we expect decreased sales of products for in-office consumption in some markets and channels. While this decrease in demand has been partially offset by increased sales of certain products for in-home consumption, we are unable to predict for how long or to what extent this increase will continue. Moreover, our channel partners have experienced, and may continue to experience, disruptions in their operations due to restrictions implemented in response to COVID-19, which has caused, and may continue to cause, reduced, or cancelled orders and/or collection risks. This has further adversely impacted our results of operations and we expect it to continue to have a negative impact on our results of operations.
Additionally, we have experienced temporary factory closures and other supply chain disruptions as a result of COVID-19, and we may continue to experience such disruptions. For example, our manufacturing sites, including in China and Southeast Asia, as well as those of our suppliers and outsourcing partners, were adversely impacted by COVID-19 as a result of quarantines, facility closures, and travel and logistics restrictions. As of the end of fiscal year 2020, our factories have returned to largely normalized levels. These disruptions in Asia resulted in temporary supply shortages that affected sales worldwide for both Personal Systems and Print, as well as incremental costs. We may experience further disruptions in the future, and any prolonged disruptions to our manufacturing operations, supply chain and/or distribution channels could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We continue to have significant sources of cash and liquidity and access to committed credit lines, but a prolonged period of generating lower cash from operations could adversely affect our financial condition.
We are also facing increased operational challenges as we take measures to support and protect employee health and safety, including limiting employee travel, closing facilities and offices, and implementing work-from-home policies for employees. In particular, our remote work arrangements, coupled with stay-at-home orders and quarantines, pose challenges for our employees and our IT systems and extended periods of remote work arrangements could strain our business continuity plans, introduce operational risk, including cybersecurity and IT systems management risks, and impair our ability to manage our business.
The effects of COVID-19 may also limit the resources afforded to or delay the implementation of our strategic initiatives and make it more difficult to develop, manufacture and market innovative products and services. If our strategic initiatives are delayed or otherwise modified, such initiatives may not achieve some or all of the expected benefits, which could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The ultimate impact of COVID-19 on our operations and financial performance depends on many factors that are not within our control, including: governmental, business and individuals’ actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the pandemic; general economic uncertainty in global markets and financial market volatility; global economic conditions and levels of economic growth; and the pace of recovery when the COVID-19 pandemic subsides.
Further, COVID-19, and the volatile regional and global economic conditions stemming from the pandemic, could precipitate or aggravate the other risk factors that we identify in this report, any of which could materially adversely impact our business. We also face an increased risk of litigation and governmental and regulatory scrutiny as a result of the effects of
COVID-19 on economic and market conditions. Further, COVID-19 may also affect our business and financial results in ways that are not presently known to us or that we do not currently consider as significant risks to our operations.
If we are unsuccessful at addressing our business challenges, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected and our ability to invest in and grow our business could be limited.
Our business faces many challenges we must address. One set of challenges relates to dynamic and accelerating market trends, which may include declines in the markets in which we operate. For example, a competitive pricing environment and weakened market in certain geographies with associated customer pricing sensitivity has presented market challenges in Printing. A second set of challenges relates to changes in the competitive landscape. Our primary competitors are exerting increased competitive pressure in targeted areas and are entering new markets; our emerging competitors are introducing new technologies and business models; and our alliance partners in some businesses are increasingly becoming our competitors in others. A third set of challenges relates to business model changes and our go-to-market execution. For example, we may fail to develop innovative products and services, maintain the manufacturing quality of our products, manage our global, multi-tier distribution network, limit potential misuse of pricing programs by our channel partners, exclude imitation print supplies from our printers with technological protection measures, adapt to new or changing marketplaces or successfully market new products and services, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
In addition, we have in the recent pastcurrently face, and may againface in the future, facean unpredictable macroeconomic challenges, including weakness in certain geographic regions and global political developments that impact international trade, such as trade disputes and increased tariffs. Weenvironment, which may also be vulnerable to increased risks associated with our efforts to address such challenges given the broad range of geographic markets in which we and our customers and partners operate.exacerbate these challenges. If we experience these challenges and do not succeed in our efforts to mitigate them,these challenges, or if these efforts are more costly or time-consuming than expected, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected, which could limit our ability to invest in and grow our business.
We operate in an intensely competitive industry and competitive pressures could harm our business and financial performance.
We encounter aggressive competition from numerous and varied competitors in all areas of our business, and our competitors have targeted and are expected to continue targeting our key market segments. We compete on the basis of our technology, innovation, performance, price, quality, reliability, brand, reputation, distribution, range of products and services, ease of use, of our products, account relationships, customer training, service and support, security, availability of application
software and internet infrastructure offerings, and our sustainability performance. If our products, services, support and cost structure do not enable us to compete successfully, our results of operations, cash flows and business prospects could be harmed.
We have a large portfolio of products and must allocate our financial, personnel and other resources across all of our products while competing with companies that have smaller portfolios or specialize in one or more of our product lines. As a result, we may invest less in certain areas of our business than our competitors, and our competitors may have greater financial, technical and marketing resources available to their products and services compared to the resources allocated to our competing products and services.
Companies with whom we have alliancesOur alliance partners in certain areas may be or may become our competitors in other areas.others. In addition, companies with whom we have alliancesthese partners also may acquire or form alliances with our competitors, which could reduce their business with us. If we are unable to effectively manage these complicated relationships with alliance partners, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We face aggressive price competition and may have to continue lowering the prices of many of our products and services to stay competitive, while at the same time trying to maintain or improve our revenue and gross margin. In addition, competitors who have a greater presence in some of the lower-cost markets in which we compete, or who can obtain better pricing, more favorable contractual terms and conditions, and/or more favorable allocations of products and components during periods of limited supply, may be able to offer lower prices than we are able to offer. Our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by these and other industry-wide pricing pressures.
Industry consolidation may also affect competition by creating larger, more homogeneous and potentially stronger competitors in the markets in which we operate. Additionally, our competitors may affect our business by entering into exclusive arrangements with our existing or potential customers or suppliers.
Because our business model is based on providing innovative and high-quality products, we may spend a proportionately greater amount of our revenues on research and development than some of our competitors. If we cannot proportionately decrease our cost structure (apart from research and development expenses) on a timely basis in response to competitive price pressures, our gross margin and therefore, our profitability could be adversely affected. In addition, if our pricing and other facets of our offerings are not sufficiently competitive, or if there is a negative reception to our product decisions, we may lose market share in certain areas, which could adversely affect our financial performance and business prospects.
Even if we are able to maintain or increase market share for a particular product, itsthe financial performance of that product could decline because the product is in a maturing industry or market segment or contains technology that is becoming obsolete. Financial performance could also decline due to increased competition from other types of products. For example, non-original supplies (including imitation, refill or remanufactured alternatives) for some of our LaserJet toner and InkJet cartridges compete with our Printing Supplies business.
Customers are increasingly using online and omnichannel resellers and distributors to purchase our products. These resellers and distributors often sell our products alongside competing products, including non-original print supplies, or they may highlight the availability of lower cost non-original supplies. We expect this competition will continue, and it may negatively impact our financial performance, particularly if large commercial customers purchase competing products instead of HP products.
If we cannot successfully execute our strategy and continue to develop, manufacture and market innovative products and services, our business and financial performance may suffer.
Our strategy is focused on leveraging our existing portfolio of products and services to meet the demands of a continually changing technological landscape and to offset certain areas of industry decline. To successfully execute this strategy, we must emphasize the aspects of our core business where demand remains strong, identify and capitalize on natural areas of growth, innovate and develop new products and services that will enable us to expand beyond our existing technology categories and adapt to new and changing marketplaces for our products. For example, our go-to-market strategy, including online, omnichannel and contractual sales, needs to evolve in-line with market dynamics, forces and demand. In fiscal year 2020, we created a single commercial organization led by a newly-created chief commercial officer role. If we cannot innovate, develop and execute evolutionary strategies in this changing environment (including our end to end business model in Print), then we may not be able to successfully compete and maintain the value proposition of our products, including supplies. Any failure to successfully execute this strategy, including any failure to invest sufficiently in strategic growth areas, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
The Moreover, the process of developing new high-technology products and services and enhancing existing products and services is complex, costly and uncertain, and any failure by us to anticipate customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends accurately could significantly harm our market share, cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. For example,
To execute our strategy, includes advancing our position in the Personal Systems and Printing markets. In Personal Systems, we are
focused on reinventing computing experiences, growing the lifetime value of our products, and accelerating services and solutions; in Printing, we are focused on driving print innovation, maximizing the value of our installed base of printers, accelerating our contractual business model and pivoting our business models to providing customers choice. Our strategy also includes disrupting in our industrial businesses, primarily by expanding our Graphics and 3D Printing solutions and unlocking new sources of value from microfluidics.
We must optimize our cost structure, make long-term investments, develop or acquire and appropriately protect intellectual property, and commit significant research and development and other resources before knowing whether our predictions will accurately reflect customer demand for our products and services. Any failure to accurately predict technological and business trends, control research and development costs or execute our strategy could harm our business and financial performance. Our research and development initiatives or other investments may not be successful in whole or in part, including research and development projects which we have prioritized with respect to funding and/or personnel, and our customers may not adopt our new business models.
Our industry is subject to rapid and substantial innovation and technological change. Even if we successfully develop new products and technologies, future products and technologies may eventually supplant ours if we are unable to keep pace with technological advances and end-user requirements and preferences and timely enhance our existing products and technologies or develop new ones. Our competitors may also create products that replace ours. As a result, any of our products and technologies may be rendered obsolete or uneconomical.
After we develop a product, we must be able to manufacture appropriate volumes quickly while also managing costs and preserving or improving margins. To accomplish this, we must accurately forecast volumes, mixes of products and configurations that meet customer requirements, and we may not succeed at doing so within a given product’s lifecycle or at all. Any delay in the development, production or marketing of a new product, service or solution could result in us not being among the first to market, which could further harm our competitive position. Moreover, new products and services may not be profitable, and even if they are profitable, operating margins for some new products and businesses may not be as high as the margins we have experienced historically.historically or that we had expected.
If we cannot continue to produce high-quality and secure products and services, our reputation, business and financial performance may suffer.
In the course of conducting our business, we must address quality and security issues associated with our products and services, including defects in our engineering, design and manufacturing processes, unsatisfactory performance under service contracts, and unsatisfactory performance or malicious acts by third-party contractors or subcontractors or their employees. Our business is also exposed to the risk of defects in third-party components included in our products, including security vulnerabilities, as illustrated by the “Spectre” and “Meltdown” side-channel exploit threats.vulnerabilities. In order to address quality and security issues, we work extensively with our customers and suppliers and engage in product testing to determine the causes of problems and to develop and implement effective solutions. However, the products and services that we offer are complex, and our regular testing and quality control efforts may not be completely effective in controlling or detecting all quality and security issues or errors, particularly with respect to defects or security vulnerabilities in components manufactured by third parties.
If we are unable to determine the cause or find an effective solution to address quality andor security issues with our products, we may delay shipment to customers, which would delay revenue recognition and receipt of customer payments and could adversely affect our net revenue, cash flows and profitability. We have and may again in the future write off some or all of the value of defective inventory. In addition, after products are delivered, quality and security issues may require us to repair or replace such products. Addressing quality and securitythese issues can be expensive and may result in additional warranty, repair, replacement and other costs, adversely affecting our financial performance. In the event of security vulnerabilities or other issues with third-partythird-
party components, we may have to rely on third parties to provide mitigation techniques such as firmware updates. Furthermore, these mitigation techniques for vulnerabilities in third-party components may be ineffective or may result in adverse performance, system instability and data loss or corruption. If new or existing customers have difficulty operating our products or are dissatisfied with our services, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected, and we could face possible claims if we fail to meet our customers’ expectations. In addition, quality and security issues, including those resulting from defects or security vulnerabilities in third-party components, can impair our relationships with new or existing customers and adversely affect our brand and reputation, which could, in turn, adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
The net revenue and profitability of our operations have historically varied, which makes our future financial results less predictable.
Our net revenue, gross margin and profit vary among our diverseportfolio of products and services, customer groups and geographic markets and therefore will likely be different in future periods than our current results. Overall gross margins and profitability in any given period are dependent on the product, service, customer and geographic mix reflected in that period’s net revenue,
which in turn depends on the overall demand for our products and services. For example, a combination of a higher consumer mix within both Personal Systems and Print hardware and lower rate in commercial print negatively impacted gross margin in fiscal 2020. Delays or reductions in spending by our customers or potential customers could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and services, which could result in a significant decline in net revenue. In addition, net revenue declines in some of our businesses may affect net revenue in our other businesses as we may lose cross-selling opportunities. Competition, lawsuits, investigations, increases in component and manufacturing costs that we are unable to pass on to our customers, increased tariffs, component supply disruptions and other risks affecting our businesses may also have a significant impact on our overall gross margin and profitability. In addition, newer geographic markets maycan be relatively less profitable due to our investments associated with entering those markets and local pricing pressures, and we maycan have difficulty establishing and maintaining the operating infrastructure necessary to support the high growth rate associated with some of those markets. Market trends, industry shifts, competitive pressures, commoditization of products, increased component or shipping costs, increased tariffs, regulatory impacts and other factors may result in reductions in revenue or pressure on gross margins in a given period, which may lead to adjustments to our operations. For example, our supplies business has recently experienced declining revenues due to declines in market share, installed base and usage, and increased customer pricing sensitivity. Our efforts to address the challenges facing our business could increase the level of variability in our financial results because the rate at which we are able to realize the benefits from those efforts may vary from period to period.
We depend on third-party suppliers, and our financial results could suffer if we fail to manage our suppliers effectively.
Our operations depend on our ability to anticipate our needs for components, products and services, as well as our suppliers’ ability to deliver sufficient quantities of quality components, products and services at reasonable prices and in time for us to meet critical schedules for the delivery of our own products and services. Given the wide variety of products and services that we offer, the large numberand diverse distribution of our suppliers and contract manufacturers, that are located around the world, and the long lead times required to manufacture, assemble and deliver certain components and products, problems could arise in production, planning and inventory management and regulatory compliance that could seriously harm our business. Third-party suppliers may have limited financial resources to withstand challenging business conditions, particularly as a result of increased interest rates or emerging market volatility, and our business could be negatively impacted if key suppliers are forced to cease or limit their operations. Due to the international nature of our third-party supplier network, our financial results may also be negatively impacted by increased trade barriers and increased tariffs, which could increase the cost of certain components, products and services that we may not be able to offset. In addition, our ongoing efforts to optimize the efficiency of our supply chain could cause supply disruptions and be more expensive, time-consuming and resource-intensive than expected. Furthermore, certain of our suppliers may decide to discontinue conducting business with us. Other supplier problems that we could face include component shortages, excess supply, risks related to the terms of our contracts with suppliers, risks associated with contingent workers, risks related to supply chain working conditions, human rights and materials sourcing and risks related to our relationships with single-source suppliers, each of which is described below.
| |
• | •Component shortages. We may experience a shortage of, or a delay in receiving, certain components as a result of strong demand, capacity constraints, supplier financial weaknesses, the inability of suppliers to borrow funds, disputes with suppliers (some of whom are also our customers), disruptions in the operations of component suppliers, other problems experienced by suppliers or problems faced during the transition to new suppliers. For example, we experienced disruptions in our manufacturing and supply chain during the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in temporary supply shortages that negatively affected our ability to fulfill demand for Personal Systems and Printing products worldwide. Additionally, our Personal Systems business relies heavily upon OMs to manufacture its products and is therefore dependent upon the continuing operations of those OMs to fulfill demand for our products. We represent a substantial portion of the business of some of these OMs, and any changes to the nature or volume of our business transactions with a particular OM could adversely affect the operations and financial condition of the OM and lead to shortages or delays in receiving products from that OM. If shortages or delays persist, the price of certain components may increase, we may be exposed to quality issues or the components may not be available at all. We may
not be able to secure enough components at reasonable prices or of acceptable quality to build products or provide services in a timely manner in the quantities needed or according to our specifications. Accordingly, our business, cash flows, results of operations and financial condition could suffer if we lose time-sensitive sales, incur additional freight costs or are unable to pass on price increases to our customers. If we cannot adequately address supply issues, we might have to re-engineer some product or service offerings, which could result in further costs and delays. •Excess supply. In order to secure components for our products or services, we may make advance payments to suppliers or enter into non-cancelable commitments with vendors. In addition, we may purchase components strategically in advance of demand to take advantage of favorable pricing or to address concerns about future availability. If we fail to anticipate customer demand properly, a temporary oversupply could result in excess or obsolete components, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. • We may experience a shortage of, or a delay in receiving, certain components as a result of strong demand, capacity constraints, supplier financial weaknesses, the inability of suppliers to borrow funds, disputes with suppliers (some of whom are also our customers), disruptions in the operations of component suppliers, other problems experienced by suppliers or problems faced during the transition to new suppliers. For example, our PC business relies heavily upon OMs to manufacture its products and is therefore dependent upon the continuing operations of those OMs to fulfill demand for our PC products. We represent a substantial portion of the business of some of these OMs, and any changes to the nature or volume of our business transactions with a particular OM could adversely affect the operations and financial condition of the OM and lead to shortages or delays in receiving products from that OM. If shortages or delays persist, the price of certain components may increase, we may be exposed to quality issues or the components may not be available at all. We may not be able to secure enough components at reasonable prices or of acceptable quality to build products or provide services in a timely manner in the quantities needed or according to our specifications. Accordingly, our business, cash flows, results of operations and financial condition could suffer if we lose time-sensitive sales, incur additional freight costs or are unable to pass on price increases to our customers. If we cannot adequately address supply issues, we might have to re-engineer some product or service offerings, which could result in further costs and delays. |
| |
• | Excess supply. In order to secure components for our products or services, at times we may make advance payments to suppliers or enter into non-cancelable commitments with vendors. In addition, we may purchase components strategically in advance of demand to take advantage of favorable pricing or to address concerns about the availability of future components. If we fail to anticipate customer demand properly, a temporary oversupply could result in excess or obsolete components, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
|
| |
• | Contractual terms. As a result of binding long-term price or purchase commitments with vendors, we may be obligated to purchase components or services at prices that are higher than those available in the current market and be limited in our ability to respond to changing market conditions. If we commit to purchasing components or services at prices that are higher than those available in the current market and be limited in our ability to respond to changing market conditions. If we commit to purchasing components or |
services for prices in excess of the then-current market price, we may be at a disadvantage to competitors who have access to components or services at lower prices, our gross margin could suffer, and we could incur additional charges relating to inventory obsolescence. In addition, many of our competitors obtain products or components from the same OMs and suppliers that we utilize. Our competitors may obtain better pricing, more favorable contractual terms and conditions, and more favorable allocations of products and components during periods of limited supply, and our ability to engage in relationships with certain OMs and suppliers could be limited. The practice employed by our PCPersonal Systems business of purchasing product components and transferring those components to OMs may create large supplier receivables with the OMs that, depending on the financial condition of the OMs, may create collectability risks. In addition, certain of our OMs and suppliers may decide to discontinue conducting business with us. Any of these developments could adversely affect our future cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
| |
• | •Contingent workers. We also rely on third-party suppliers for the provision of contingent workers, and our failure to effectively manage our use of such workers effectively could adversely affect our results of operations. We have been exposed to various legal claims relating to the status of contingent workers in the past and could face similar claims in the future. We may be subject to shortages, oversupply or fixed contractual terms relating to contingent workers. Our ability to manage the size of, and costs associated with, the contingent workforce may be subject to additional constraints imposed by local laws. •Working conditions, human rights and materials sourcing. We work with our suppliers to improve their labor practices, working conditions, and respect for human rights, such as by including requirements in our agreements with our suppliers that workers receive fair treatment, safe working conditions and freely chosen employment, that materials are responsibly sourced and that business operations are conducted in a socially and environmentally responsible and ethical way. Brand perception, customer loyalty and legal compliance could be adversely impacted by a supplier’s improper practices or failure to comply with the above-mentioned requirements or those included in our Supplier Code of Conduct, General Specification for the Environment and other related provisions and requirements of our procurement contracts, including supplier audits, reporting of smelters, human rights due diligence, wood fiber certification (for HP brand paper and product packaging) and GHG emissions, water and waste data. •Single-source suppliers. We obtain a significant number of components from single sources due to technology, availability, price, quality or other considerations. For example, we rely on Canon for certain laser printer engines and laser toner cartridges. We also rely on both Intel and AMD to provide us with a sufficient supply of processors for the majority of our PCs and workstations. Some of those processors may be customized for our products. New products that we introduce may utilize custom components obtained from only one source initially until we have evaluated whether there is a need for additional suppliers. Replacing a single-source supplier could delay production of some products as replacement suppliers may be subject to capacity constraints or other output limitations. For some components, such as customized components and some of the processors that we obtain from Intel, or the laser printer engines and toner cartridges that we obtain from Canon, alternative sources either may not exist or may be unable to produce the quantities of those components necessary to satisfy our production requirements. In addition, we sometimes purchase components from single-source suppliers under short-term agreements that contain favorable pricing and other terms but that may be unilaterally modified or terminated by the supplier with limited notice and with little or no penalty. The performance of such single-source suppliers under those agreements (and the renewal or extension of those agreements upon similar terms) may affect the quality, quantity and price of our components. The loss of a single-source supplier, the deterioration of our relationship with a single-source supplier, or any unilateral modification to the contractual terms under which we are supplied components by a single-source supplier could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
|
| |
• | Working conditions and materials sourcing. We work with our suppliers to improve their labor practices and working conditions, such as by including requirements in our agreements with our suppliers that workers receive fair treatment, safe working conditions and freely chosen employment, that materials are responsibly sourced and that business operations are conducted in an environmentally responsible and ethical way. Brand perception and customer loyalty could be adversely impacted by a supplier’s improper practices or failure to comply with the above-mentioned requirements or those included in our Supplier Code of Conduct, General Specification for the Environment and other related provisions and requirements of our procurement contracts, including supplier audits, reporting of smelters, wood fiber certification (for HP brand paper and product packaging) and GHG emissions, water and waste data.
|
| |
• | Single-source suppliers. We obtain a significant number of components from single sources due to technology, availability, price, quality or other considerations. For example, we rely on Canon for certain laser printer engines and laser toner cartridges. We also rely on Intel to provide us with a sufficient supply of processors for many of our PCs and workstations, and we rely on AMD to provide us with a sufficient supply of processors for other products. Some of those processors are customized for our products. New products that we introduce may utilize custom components obtained from only one source initially until we have evaluated whether there is a need for additional suppliers. Replacing a single-source supplier could delay production of some products as replacement suppliers may be subject to capacity constraints or other output limitations. For some components, such as customized components and some of the processors that we obtain from Intel, or the laser printer engines and toner cartridges that we obtain from Canon, alternative sources either may not exist or may be unable to produce the quantities of those components necessary to satisfy our production requirements. In addition, we sometimes purchase components from single-source suppliers under short-term agreements that contain favorable pricing and other terms but that may be unilaterally modified or terminated by the supplier with limited notice and with little or no penalty. The performance of such single-source suppliers under those agreements (and the renewal or extension of those agreements upon similar terms) may affect the quality, quantity and price of our components. The loss of a single-source supplier, the deterioration of our relationship with a single-source supplier, or any unilateral modification to the contractual terms under which we are supplied components by a single-source supplier could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
|
If we fail to manage the distribution of our products and services properly, our business and financial performance could suffer.
We use a variety of distribution methods to sell our products and services around the world, including third-party resellers and distributors and both direct and indirect sales to enterprise accounts and consumers. Successfully managing the interaction of our direct sales and indirect channel sales efforts to reach various potential customer segments for our products and services is a complex process. Moreover, since each distribution method has distinct risks and gross margins, any failure to implement the most advantageous balance in the delivery model for our products and services could adversely affect our net revenue and gross margins and therefore our profitability.profitability and cash flows.
Our financial results could be materially adversely affected due to distribution channel conflicts or if the financial conditions of our channel partners were to weaken. Our results of operations may be adversely affected by any conflicts that might arise between our various distribution channels or the loss or deterioration of any alliance or distribution arrangement or reduced assortments of our products. Moreover, some of our wholesale and retail distributors may have insufficient financial
resources and may not be able to withstand changes in business conditions, including economic weakness, industry consolidation and market trends. They may also have difficulty selling our products under new business models. Many of our significant distributors operate on narrow margins and have been negatively affected by business pressures in the past. Considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral or credit insurance are outstanding with our distribution and retail channel partners. Net revenue from indirect sales could suffer, and we could experience disruptions in distribution, if our distributors’ financial conditions, abilities to borrow funds or operations weaken or if our distributors cannot successfully compete in the online or omnichannel marketplace.
Our inventory management is complex, as we continue to sell a significant mix of products through distributors. We must manage both owned and channel inventory effectively, particularly with respect to sales to distributors, which involves forecasting demand and pricing challenges. Our forecasts may not accurately predict demand, and distributors may increase orders during periods of product shortages, cancel orders if their inventory is too high or delay orders in anticipation of new products. Distributors also may adjust their orders in response to the supply of our products and the products of our competitors and seasonal fluctuations in end-user demand. Our reliance upon indirect distribution methods, including a multi-tiered channel, may reduce our visibility into inventories, demand and pricing trends and issues, and therefore make forecasting and managing multi-tiered channel inventory more difficult. Further, if we were to expand direct distribution initiatives, distributors could consider such initiatives to conflict with their business interests and reduce their investment in the distribution and sale of our products, or to cease all sales of our products. Sales of our products by channel partners to unauthorized resellers or unauthorized resale of our products could also make our forecasting and channel inventory management more difficult and impact pricing in the market. For example, in the past we have had channel partners sell products outside of their agreed territory, and misrepresent sales to unauthorized resellers as sales to end-users, frustrating our efforts to estimate channel inventory and maintain consistent pricing, and negatively impacting gross margins. If we have excess or obsolete inventory, we may have to reduce our prices and write down inventory. Moreover, our use of indirect distribution channels may limit our willingness or ability to adjust prices quickly and otherwise to respond to pricing changes by competitors. In addition, factors in different markets may cause differential discounting between the geographies where our products are sold, which makes it difficult to achieve global consistency in pricing and creates the opportunity for grey marketing.
In addition, we depend on our channel partners globally to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. To the extent they fail to do so, that could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Our uneven sales cycle makes planning and inventory management difficult and future financial results less predictable.
Our quarterly sales often have reflected a pattern in which a disproportionate percentage of each quarter’s total sales occurs towards the end of the quarter. This uneven sales pattern makes predicting net revenue, earnings, cash flow from operations and working capital for each financial period difficult, increases the risk of unanticipated variations in our quarterly results and financial condition and places pressure on our inventory management and logistics systems. If predicted demand is substantially greater than orders, there may be excess inventory. Alternatively, if orders substantially exceed predicted demand, we may not be able to fulfill all of the orders received in each quarter and such orders may be canceled by the customer. Depending on when they occur in a quarter, developments such as a systems failure, component pricing movements, component shortages or global logistics disruptions could adversely impact our inventory levels, andour results of operations and cash flows in a manner that is disproportionate to the number of days in the quarter affected.
We experience some seasonal trends in the sale of our products that also may produce variations in our quarterly results and financial condition. For example, sales to governments (particularly sales to the U.S. government) are often stronger in the third calendar quarter, and many customers whose fiscal year is the calendar year spend their remaining capital budget authorizations in the fourth calendar quarter prior to new budget constraints in the first calendar quarter of the following year. Consumer sales are often higher in the fourth calendar quarter compared to other quarters due in part to seasonal holiday demand. European sales are often weaker during the summer months. Demand during the spring and early summer also may be adversely impacted by market anticipation of seasonal trends. Moreover, to the extent that we introduce new products in anticipation of seasonal demand trends, our discounting of existing products may adversely affect our gross margin prior to or shortly after such product
launches. Typically, our fourth fiscal quarter is our strongest by revenues. Many of the factors that create and affect seasonal trends are beyond our control.
Any failure by us to identify, manage and complete acquisitions, divestitures and other significant transactions successfully could harm our financial results, business and prospects.
As part of our business strategy, we may acquire companies or businesses, divest businesses or assets, enter into strategic alliances and joint ventures and make investments to further our business (collectively, “business combination and investment transactions”).business. Risks associated with business combination and investmentthese transactions include the following, any of which could adversely affect our revenue, gross margin, profitability, cash flows and financial results:condition:
•Managing business combination and investmentthese transactions requires varying levels of management resources, which may divert our attention from other business operations.
•We may not fully realize all of the anticipated benefits of any particular business combination and investment transaction, and the timeframe for realizing the benefits of a particular business combination and investment transaction may depend partially upon the actions of employees, advisors, suppliers, other third-parties, competition or market trends.
•Certain prior business combination and investment transactions have resulted, and in the future any such transactions may result, in significant costs and expenses, including those related to severance pay, early retirement costs, employee benefit costs, goodwill and asset impairment charges, charges from the elimination of duplicative facilities and contracts, asset impairment charges, inventory adjustments, assumed litigation and other liabilities, legal, accounting and financial advisory fees, and required payments to executive officers and key employees under retention plans.
•Any increased or unexpected costs, unanticipated delays or failures to meet contractual obligations could make business combination and investmentthese transactions less profitable than anticipated or unprofitable.
Our ability to conduct due diligence with respect to business combination and investment transactions, and our ability to evaluate the results of such due diligence, is dependent upon the veracity and completeness of statements and disclosures made or actions taken by third parties or their representatives.
•Our due diligence process may fail to identify significant issues with the acquired company’s product quality, financial disclosures, accounting practices or internal controls.controls, including as a result of being dependent on the veracity and completeness of statements and disclosures made or actions taken by third parties.
•The pricing and other terms of our contracts for business combination and investmentthese transactions require us to make estimates and assumptions at the time we enter into these contracts, and during the course of our due diligence, we may not identify all of the factors necessary to estimate accurately our costs, timing and other matters or we may incur costs if a business combination and investment transaction is not consummated.
•In order to complete a business combination and investment transaction, we may issue common stock, potentially creating dilution for our existing stockholders.
•We may borrow to finance business combination and investmentthese transactions, and the amount and terms of any potential acquisition-related or other borrowings,such debt, as well as other factors, could affect our liquidity and financial condition.
Our effective tax rate on an ongoing basis is uncertain, and business combination and investment•These transactions could adversely impact our effective tax rate.
•Any announced business combination and investment transaction may not close on the expected timeframe or at all, which may cause our financial results to differ from expectations in a given quarter.
Business combination and investment•These transactions may lead to litigation, which could impact our financial condition and results of operations.litigation.
•If we fail to identify and successfully complete and integrate business combination and investment transactions that further our strategic objectives, we may be required to expend resources to develop products, services and technology internally, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage.
We have incurred and will incur additional depreciation and amortization expense over the useful lives of certain assets acquired in connection with business combination and investment transactions, and, to the extent that the value of goodwill, tangible or intangible assets acquired in connection with a business combination and investment transaction becomes impaired, we may be required to incur additional material charges relating to the impairment of those assets. If there are future decreases in our stock price or significant changes in the business climate or results of operations of our reporting units, we may incur additional charges, which may include impairment charges.
As part of our business strategy, we regularly evaluate the potential disposition of assets and businesses that may no longer help us meet our objectives. When we decide to sell assets or a business, we may encounterhave difficulty in finding buyers or alternative exit strategies on acceptable terms in a timely manner, which could delay the achievement of our strategic objectives. We may also dispose of a business at a price or on terms that are less desirable than we had anticipated. In addition, we may experience greater dis-synergies than expected, and the impact of the divestiture on our revenue growth may be larger than projected. After reaching an agreement with a buyer or seller for the acquisition or disposition of a business, we are subject to satisfaction of pre-closing conditions as well as necessary regulatory and governmental approvals on acceptable terms, which, if not satisfied or obtained, may prevent us from completing the transaction. Such regulatory and governmental approvals may be required in diverse jurisdictions around the world, including jurisdictions with opaque regulatory frameworks, and any delays in the timing of such approvals could materially delay the transaction or prevent it from closing.
Integrating acquisitions may be difficult and time-consuming. Any failure by us to integrate acquired companies, products or services into our overall business in a timely manner could harm our financial results, business and prospects.
In order toTo pursue our strategy successfully, we musthave to identify candidates for and successfully complete business combination and investment transactions, some of which may be large or complex, and manage post-closing issues such as the
integration of acquired businesses, products, services or employees. Integration issuesIntegrations involve significant challenges and are often time-consuming and expensive
and, without proper planning and implementation, could significantly disrupt our business and the acquired business. TheThese challenges involved in integration include:
include successfully combining product and service offerings andofferings; entering or expanding into markets in which we are not experienced or are developing expertise;
convincing both ourmarkets; retaining key employees; integrating employees, facilities, technology, products, processes, operations (including supply and manufacturing operations), sales and distribution channels, business models and business systems; and retaining customers and distributors and those of the acquired business that the transaction will not diminish client service standards or business focus;
persuading both our customers and distributors and those of the acquired business not to defer purchasing decisions or switch to other suppliers (which could result in our incurring additional obligations in order to address customer uncertainty), minimizing sales force attrition and expanding and coordinating sales, marketing and distribution efforts;
consolidating and rationalizing corporate IT infrastructure, which may include multiple legacy systems from various acquisitions and integrating software code and business processes;
minimizing the diversion of management attention from ongoing business concerns;
persuading employees that business cultures are compatible, maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees, engaging with employee works councils representing an acquired company’s non-U.S. employees, integrating employees, correctly estimating employee benefit costs and implementing restructuring programs;
coordinating and combining administrative, manufacturing, research and development and other operations, subsidiaries, facilities and relationships with third-parties in accordance with local laws and other obligations while maintaining adequate standards, controls and procedures;
achieving savings from supply chain integration; and
managing integration issues shortly after or pending the completion of other independent transactions.businesses.
We may not achieve some or all of the expected benefits of our restructuring plan and our restructuring may adversely affect our business.
We have undertaken and may undertake in the future restructuring plans in order to realign our cost structure due to the changing nature of our business and to achieve operating efficiencies that we expect to reduce costs, including the plans announced in October 2016 which we(as amended in May 2018,2018), and the plan announced in October 2019. We began implementing the 2020 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019 and expect to complete the restructuring by the end of fiscal 2022. Implementation of any restructuring plan may be costly and disruptive to our business, and we may not be able to obtain the estimated workforce reductions within the projected timing or at all, or the cost savings and benefits that were initially anticipated. We currently plan to invest some of the savings from our 2020 restructuring plan across our businesses, including investing to build our digital capabilities, and if we are unable to obtain the anticipated in connection withcost savings, our restructuring.ability to make those investments and execute our strategy may be negatively impacted. Additionally, as a result of restructuring initiatives, we may experience a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge and/or inefficiency, adverse effects on employee morale, loss of key employees and/or other retention issues during transitional periods. Reorganization and restructuring can require a significant amount of management and other employees’ time and focus, which may divert attention from operating and growing our business. If we fail to achieve some or all of the expected benefits of restructuring, it could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For more information about our 2020 restructuring plans,plan, see Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Our financial performance may suffer if we cannot continue to develop, license or enforce the intellectual property rights on which our businesses depend.
We rely upon patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property (“IP”) laws in the United States, similar laws in other countries, and agreements with our employees, customers, suppliers and other parties, to establish and maintain IP rights in the products and services we sell, provide or otherwise use in our operations. However, any of our IP rights could be challenged, invalidated, infringed or circumvented, or such IP rights may not be sufficient to permit us to take advantage of current market trends or to otherwise provide competitive advantages, either of which could result in costly product redesign efforts, discontinuance of certain product offerings or other harm to our competitive position. For example, our enforcement of our IP rights of our InkJet printer supplies against infringers may be successfully challenged or our IP rights may be successfully circumvented. Further, the laws of certain countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Therefore, in certain jurisdictions we may be unable to protect our proprietary technology adequately against unauthorized third-party copying or use; this, too, could adversely affect our ability to sell products or services and our competitive position.
In connection with the Separation, Hewlett-Packard Company allocated to each of Hewlett Packard Enterprise and HP the IP assets relevant to their respective businesses. The terms of the Separation also include cross-licenses and other arrangements to provide for certain ongoing use of IP in the existing operations of both businesses. As a result of the allocation of IP as part of the Separation, we no longer own IP allocated to Hewlett Packard Enterprise and our resulting IP ownership position could adversely affect our position and options relating to patent and trademark enforcement, patent licensing and cross-licensing, our ability to sell our products or services, our competitive position in the industry and our ability to enter new product markets.
Our products and services depend in part on IP and technology licensed from third parties.parties.
Some of our business and some of our products rely on key technologies developed or licensed by third parties. We may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses and technologies from these third parties at all or on reasonable terms, or
such third parties may demand cross-licenses to our IP. Third-party components may become obsolete, defective or incompatible with future versions of our products, or our relationship with the third party may deteriorate, or our agreements with the third party may expire or be terminated. We may face legal or business disputes with licensors that may threaten or lead to the disruption of inbound licensing relationships. In order to remain in compliance with the terms of our licenses, we must carefully monitor and manage our use of third-party components, including both proprietary and open source license terms that may require the licensing or public disclosure of our IP without compensation or on undesirable terms. Additionally, some of these licenses may not be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable or that allow our product offerings to remain competitive. Our inability to obtain licenses or rights on favorable terms could have a material effect on our business, including our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, it is possible that as a consequence of a merger or acquisition, third parties may obtain licenses to some of our IP rights or our business may be subject to certain restrictions that were not in place prior to such transaction. Because the availability and cost of licenses from third parties depends upon the willingness of third parties to deal with us on the terms we request, there is a risk that third parties who license to our competitors will either refuse to license to us at all
or refuse to license to us on terms equally favorable to those granted to our competitors. Consequently, we may lose a competitive advantage with respect to these IP rights or we may be required to enter into costly arrangements in order to terminate or limit these rights. Finally, we may rely on third-parties to enforce certain IP rights. For instance, we rely on Canon to enforce IP rights associated with certain LaserJet products. Failure by Canon to do so could impair our ability to protect our market share for those products.
Third-party claims of IP infringement are commonplace in our industry and successful third-party claims may limit or disrupt our ability to sell our products and services.
Third parties alsohave in the past claimed, and may in the future claim, that we or customers indemnified by us are infringing upon their IP rights. For example, patent assertion entities may purchase IP assets for the purpose of asserting claims of infringement and attempting to extract settlements from companies such as us and our customers.settlements. These assertions have increased over time, particularly in the United States. If we cannot or do not license allegedly infringed IP at all or on reasonable terms, or if we are required to substitute similar technology from another source, our operations could be adversely affected. Even if we believe that IP claims are without merit, they can be time-consuming and costly to defend against and may divert management’s attention and resources away from our business. Claims of IP infringement also might require us to redesign affected products, enter into costly settlementsettlements or license agreements, pay costly damage awards, or face a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting us from importing, marketing or selling certain of our products. Even if we have an agreement to indemnify us against such costs, the indemnifying party may be unable or unwilling to upholdfulfill its contractual obligations to us. Additionally, claims of IP infringement may adversely impact our brand and reputation and imperil new and existing customer relationships.
Further, ourOur results of operations and cash flows have been and could continue to be affected in certain periods and on an ongoing basis by the imposition, accrual and payment of copyright levies or similar fees. In certain countries (primarily in Europe), proceedings are ongoing or have been concluded in which groups representing copyright owners have sought or are seekingseek to impose upon and collect from us levies upon IT equipment (such as PCs, multifunction devices and printers) alleged to be copying devices under applicable laws. Other such groups have also sought to modify existing levy schemes to increase the amount of the levies that can be collected from us. Other countries that have not imposed levies on these types of devices are expected to extend existing levy schemes, and countries that do not currently have levy schemes may decide to impose copyright levies on these types of devices.levies. The total amount of the copyright levies will depend on the types of products determined to be subject to the levy, the number of units of those products sold during the period covered by the levy, and the per unit fee for each type of product, all of which are affected by several factors, including the outcome of ongoing litigation involving us and other industry participants and possible action by the legislative bodies, in the applicable countries, and could be substantial. Consequently, the ultimate impact of these copyright levies or similar fees, and our ability to recover such amounts through increased prices, remains uncertain.
System security risks, data protection breaches, cyberattacks, system outages and systems integration issues could disrupt our internal operations or services provided to customers, and any such disruption could reduce our revenue, increase our expenses, damage our reputation and adversely affect our cash flows and stock price.
Individuals orWe are exposed to attacks from individuals and organizations, including malicious computer programmers and hackers, state-sponsored organizations or nation-states, may be ableseeking to penetrate our network security and misappropriate or compromise our confidential information or that of third parties, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. Such individuals or organizationsattacks may also may be able to develop and deployinvolve the deployment of viruses, worms, ransomware and other malicious software programs that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products, or attempt to fraudulently induce our employees, customers, or others to disclose passwords or other sensitive information or unwittingly provide access to our systems or data. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the system.product. Breaches of our facilities, network, or data security could disrupt the security of our systems and
business applications, impair our ability to provide services to our customers and protect the privacy of their data, result in product development delays, compromise confidential or technical business information harming our reputation or competitive position, result in theft or misuse of our IP or other assets, require us to allocate more resources to improvedimprove technologies, or otherwise adversely affect our business. Additionally, the costs to us to eliminate or alleviatecombat cyber or other security problems including bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software programs and other security vulnerabilities, couldcan be significant, and our efforts to address these problems may not be successful and could result in interruptions, delays, cessation of service and loss of existing or potential customers that may impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution or other critical functions. Media or other reports of perceived security vulnerabilities in our network security, even if nothing has actually been attempted or occurred, could also adversely impact our brand and reputation and materially affect our business. While we have developed and implemented security measures and internal controls designed to protect against cyber and other security problems, such measures cannot provide absolute security and may not be successful in preventing future security breaches. Moreover, these threats are constantly evolving, thereby increasing the difficulty of successfully defending against them or implementing adequate preventative measures. In some instances, we may have no current capability to detect certain vulnerabilities, which may allow them to persist in the environment over long periods of time. In the past, we have experienced data security incidents resulting from unauthorized access to or use of our systems or those of third parties, which to date have not had a material impact on our operations; however, there is no assurance that such impacts will not be material in the future.
We manage and store various proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data relating to our business and our customers. Breaches of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure or unapproved dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive or confidential data about us, our clients or our customers, including the potential loss or disclosure of such information or data as a result of fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, couldcan expose us, our customers or the individuals affected to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, damage our brand and reputation or otherwise harm our business, and result in government enforcement actions and litigation and potential liability for us. For example, the GDPREuropean Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) imposes a strict data protection compliance regime with severe penalties of up to the greater of 4% of worldwide annual turnover and/or €20 million. Additionally, in the United States, California has adopted, and several states are considering adopting, laws and regulations imposing varying obligations regarding the handling of personal data. We also could lose existing or potential customers or incur significant expenses in connection with our customers’ system failures or any actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in our products and services. In addition, the cost and operational consequences of implementing further data protection measures could be significant.
Portions of our IT infrastructure, including portions provided by third parties, also may experience interruptions, outages, delays or cessations of service or may produce errors in connection with systems integrations, migration work or other causes from time to time.causes. Any such events could result in business disruptions and the process of remediating them could be more expensive, time-consuming, disruptive and resource intensive than planned. Such disruptions could adversely impact our ability to fulfill orders and respond to customer requests and interrupt other processes. Delayed sales, lower margins or lost customers resulting from these disruptions could reduce our revenue, increase our expenses, damage our reputation and adversely affect our cash flows and stock price.
Our business and financial performance could suffer if we do not manage the risks associated with our services businesses properly.
The risks that accompany our services businesses differ from those of our other businesses. For example, the success of our services business depends to a significant degree on attracting clients to our services, retaining these clients and maintaining or increasing the level of revenues from these clients. Our standard services agreements are generally renewable at a customer’s option and/or subject to cancellation rights, with or without penalties for early termination. We may not be able to retain or renew services contracts with our clients, or our clients may reduce the scope of the services they contract for. Factors that may influence contract termination, non-renewal or reduction include business downturns, dissatisfaction with our services or products attached to services we provide, our retirement or lack of support for our services, our clients selecting alternative technologies to replace us, the cost of our services as compared to the cost of services offered by our competitors, general market conditions or other reasons. We may not be able to replace the revenue and earnings from lost clients or reductions in services. While our services agreements typicallymay include penalties for early termination, these penalties may not fully cover our investments in these businesses in the event a client terminates a services agreement early or reduces the scope of the agreement. Our clients could also delay or terminate implementations or use of our services or choose not to invest in additional services from us in the future. In addition, the pricing and other terms of some of our services agreements require us to make estimates and assumptions at the time we enter into these contracts that could differ from actual results. Any increased or unexpected costs or unanticipated delays in connection with the performance of these engagements, including delays caused by factors outside our control, could make these agreements less profitable or unprofitable, which could have an adverse effect on the product margin of our services business. As a result, we may not generate the revenues we may have anticipated from our services businesses within the timelines anticipated, if at all.
In order to be successful, we must attract, retain, train, motivate, develop and transition key employees, and failure to do so could seriously harm us.
In order to be successful, we must attract, be able to hire, retain, train, motivate, develop, transition and deploy qualified executives and other key employees, including those in managerial, technical, development, sales, marketing and IT support positions. Identifying, developing internally or hiring externally, training and retaining qualified executives, engineers and qualified sales representatives are critical to our future, and competition for experienced employees in the IT industry can be intense. In order to attract and retain executives and other key employees, in a competitive marketplace, we must provide a competitive compensation, package, including cash- and equity-based compensation. Our equity-based incentive awards may contain conditions relating to our stock price performance and our long-term financial performance that make the future value of those awards uncertain. If the anticipated value of such equity-based incentive awards does not materialize, if our equity-based compensation otherwise ceases to be viewed as a valuable benefit, if our total compensation package is not viewed as being competitive, or if we do not obtain the stockholder approval needed to continue granting equity-based incentive awards in the amounts we believe are necessary, our ability to attract, retain and motivate executives and key employees could be weakened. Our employee hiring and retention also depend on our ability to build and maintain a diverse and inclusive workplace culture that enables our employees to thrive. Additionally, changes in immigration policies may impair our ability to recruit and hire technical and professional talent. Our failure to successfully hire executives and key employees or the loss of any executives and key employees could have a significant impact on our operations. Further, changes in our management team may be disruptive to our business, and any failure to successfully transition and assimilate key new hires or promoted employees could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Recent global,Our business could be negatively impacted as a result of actions by activist stockholders or others.
Recently, HP was the target of a proxy contest and exchange offer by Xerox Holdings Corporation in connection with its unsolicited offer to acquire HP. While Xerox ultimately terminated its offer and withdrew the slate of director candidates it had nominated, if similar actions were taken in the future or we were the target of other activist shareholders in the future, our business could be adversely affected because responding to such actions can be costly and time-consuming, disruptive to our operations and divert the attention of management and our employees. Moreover, such actions may create perceived uncertainties among current and potential customers, clients, suppliers, employees and other constituencies as to our future direction, which could result in lost sales and the loss of business opportunities and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners. In addition, actual or perceived actions of activist stockholders may cause significant fluctuations in our stock price that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.
Some anti-takeover provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.
We have provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws each of which could have the effect of rendering more difficult or discouraging an acquisition of HP judged as undesirable by our Board of Directors. These include provisions: authorizing blank check preferred stock, which we could issue with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common stock; limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers; specifying that our stockholders may take action only at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and otherwise in accordance with our bylaws and limiting the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings; requiring advance notice of proposals by our stockholders for business to be conducted at stockholder meetings and for nominations of candidates for election to our Board of Directors; and controlling the procedures for conduct of our Board of Directors and stockholder meetings and election, appointment and removal of our directors.
These provisions could deter or delay hostile takeovers, proxy contests and changes in control or our management. As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prevents some stockholders from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of substantially all our outstanding common stock.
Any provision of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control of HP could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our stock and also could affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our stock.
MACROECONOMIC, INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL RISKS
Global, regional and local economic weakness and uncertainty could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
Our business and financial performance depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions and the demand for technology products and services in the markets in which we compete. RecentOngoing economic weakness and uncertainty in various markets throughout the world have resulted, and may result in the future, in decreased net revenue, gross margin, earnings, or growth rates or cash flows and in increased expenses and difficulty in managing inventory levels. For example, we have in the past experienced the impacts of macroeconomic weakness across many geographic regions and markets, and we may experience similar impacts in the future. Ongoing U.S. federal government spending limits may continue to reduce demand for our products and services from organizations that receive funding from the U.S. government, and could negatively affect macroeconomic conditions in the United States, which could further reduce demand for our products and services. Political developments impacting international trade, including continued uncertainty surrounding Brexit, trade disputes and increased tariffs, particularly between the United States and China, may negatively impact markets and cause weaker macroeconomic conditions or drive political or national sentiment, weakening demand for our products and services.
Economic weakness and uncertainty and political or nationalist sentiment impacting global trade, including the willingness of non-U.S. consumers to purchase goods or services from U.S. corporations, may adversely affect demand for our products and services, may result in increased expenses due to higher allowances for doubtful accounts and potential goodwill and asset impairment charges, and may make it more difficult for us to accurately forecast revenue, gross margin, cash flows and expenses.
We also have experienced, and may experience in the future, gross margin declines in certain businesses, reflecting the effect of items such as competitive pricing pressures and increases in component and manufacturing costs resulting from higher labor and material costs borne by our manufacturers and suppliers that as a result of competitive pricing pressures or other factors, we are unable to pass on to our customers. In addition, our business may be disrupted if we are unable to obtain equipment, parts or components from our suppliers—and our suppliers from their suppliers—due to the insolvency of key suppliers or the inability of key suppliers to obtain credit, or if any of our distributors including wholesale and retail distributors, lack sufficient financial resources to withstand economic weakness.
EconomicContinued economic weakness and uncertainty could also cause our expenses to vary materially from our expectations. Any financial turmoil affecting the banking system and financial markets or any significant financial services institution failures could negatively impact our treasury operations, as the financial condition of such parties may deteriorate rapidly and without notice in times of market volatility and disruption.notice. Poor financial performance of asset markets combined with lower interest rates and the adverse effects of fluctuating currency exchange rates could lead to higher pension and post-retirement benefit expenses. Interest and other expenses could
vary materially from expectations depending on changes in interest rates, borrowing costs, currency exchange rates, costs of hedging activities and the fair value of derivative instruments. There is uncertainty regarding the discontinuation, modification or reform of LIBOR and the implementation of alternative reference rates could result in an increase in our interest expense. Economic downturns also may lead to future restructuring actions and associated expenses.
Due to the international nature of our business, political or economic changes, uncertainty or other factors could harm our business and financial performance.
Approximately 65%64% of our net revenue for fiscal year 20192020 came from outside the United States. In addition, a portion of our business activity is being conducted in emerging markets. Our future business and financial performance could suffer due to a variety of international factors, including:
•ongoing instability or changes in a country’s or region’s economic, regulatory or political conditions, including inflation, recession, interest rate fluctuations, changes or uncertainty in fiscal or monetary policy, and actual or anticipated military or political conflicts, health emergencies or pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) or any other changechanges resulting from Brexit;
•longer collection cycles and financial instability among customers, the imposition by governments of additional taxes, tariffs or other restrictions on foreign trade or changes in restrictions on trade between the United States and other countries, including the impact of recently imposed tariffs between the United States and China on a wide variety of products;
•trade regulations and procedures and actions affecting production, shipping, pricing and marketing of products, including policies adopted by the United States or other countries that may champion or otherwise favor domestic companies and technologies over foreign competitors;
•political or nationalist sentiment impacting global trade, including the willingness of non-U.S. consumers to purchase goods or services from U.S. corporations;
•local labor conditions and regulations, including local labor issues faced by specific suppliers and Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”), or changes to immigration and labor law which may adversely impact our access to technical and professional talent;
•managing a geographically dispersed workforce;
•changes or uncertainty in the international, national or local regulatory and legal environments;
•differing technology standards, customer requirements or customer requirements;levels of protection of intellectual property;
•import, export or other business licensing requirements or requirements relating to making foreign direct investments, which could increase our cost of doing business in certain jurisdictions, prevent us from shipping products to particular countries or markets, affect our ability to obtain favorable terms for components, increase our operating costs or lead to penalties or restrictions;
•stringent privacy and data protection policies, such as the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”);GDPR;
•changes in tax laws; and
•fluctuations in freight costs, limitations on shipping and receiving capacity, and other disruptions in the transportation and shipping infrastructure at important geographic points of exit and entry for our products and shipments.
The factors described above also could disrupt our product and component manufacturing and key suppliers located outside of the United States. For example, we rely on manufacturers in Taiwan for the production of notebook computers and other suppliers in Asia for product assembly and manufacture.
Beginning in 2018, the United States commenced certain trade actions, including imposing tariffs on certain goods imported from China and other countries, which has resulted in retaliatory tariffs by China and other countries. Additional tariffs imposed by the United States on a broader range of imports, or further retaliatory trade measures taken by China or other countries in response, could increase the cost of our products and the components that go into making them. These increased costsTariffs or other trade restrictions could adversely impact our overall gross margin and profitability. Tariffs or other trade-related actions could also makedisrupt our products more expensivemanufacturing and supply chain, or those of our key suppliers. For example, we rely on manufacturers and suppliers in Asia for customers, which could make our products less competitive and reduce demand.the production of notebook computers.
In many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, there are companies that engage in business practices prohibited by laws and regulations applicable to us, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the “FCPA”).amended. Although we implement policies, procedures and training designed to facilitate compliance with these laws, our employees, contractors and agents, as well as those of the companies to which we outsource certain of our business operations, may take actions in violation of our policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies, could have an adverse effect on our business and reputation.
We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which could adversely impact our results.
Currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including the euro, the British pound, Chinese yuan (renminbi) and the Japanese yen, can have an impact on our results as expressed in U.S. dollars. Global economic events, including trade disputes, economic
economic sanctions and emerging market volatility, and associated uncertainty may cause currencies to fluctuate, which may contribute to variations in our sales of products and services in impacted jurisdictions. For example, the United Kingdom’s June 2016 vote to leavewithdrawal from the European Union (commonly known as “Brexit”) has caused significant volatility in currency exchange rates, especially between the U.S. dollar and the British pound. Continuedpound, and continued uncertainty regarding Brexitthe withdrawal may result in futurecontinue to cause exchange rate volatility. In addition, in the event thatif one or more European countries were to replace the euro with another currency, our sales into such countries, or into Europe generally, would likely be adversely affected until stable exchange rates are established. Because a majority of our revenues are generated outside the United States, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates such as the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro or the British pound or the weakness of the Japanese yen, could adversely affect our net revenue growth in future periods. In addition, currency variations can adversely affect margins on sales of our products in countries outside of the United States and products that include components obtained from suppliers located outside of the United States.
From time to time, we may use forward contracts andand/or options designated as cash flow hedges to protect against foreign currency exchange rate risks. The effectiveness of our hedges depends on our ability to accurately forecast future cash flows, which is particularly difficult during periods of uncertain demand for our products and services and highly volatile exchange rates. We may incur significant losses from our hedging activities due to factors such as demand volatility. In addition, certain or all of our hedging activities may be ineffective or may not offset any or more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from currency variations. Losses associated with hedging activities also may impact our revenue, financial condition and, to a lesser extent, our cost of sales.
Business disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue, cash flows and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses.
Our worldwide operations could be disrupted by earthquakes, telecommunications failures, power or water shortages, tsunamis, floods, hurricanes, typhoons,natural disasters, fires, extreme weather conditions (whether as a result of climate change or otherwise), medical epidemics or pandemics (such as COVID-19) and other natural or manmademan-made disasters or catastrophic events, for which we are predominantly self-insured. Terrorist acts, conflicts or wars, for which we are predominantly uninsured, may also disrupt our worldwide operations. The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could result in significant losses, seriously harm our revenue, profitability, cash flows and financial condition, adversely affect our competitive position, increase our costs and expenses, and require substantial expenditures and recovery time in order to fully resume operations.operations, make it difficult or impossible to provide services or deliver products to our customers or to receive components from our suppliers, create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain and/or result in the need to impose employee travel restrictions. In addition, global climate change may result in certain natural disasters occurring more frequently or with greater intensity, such as drought, wildfires, storms, sea-level rise, and flooding. Our corporate headquarters and a portion of our research and development activities are located in California, and other critical business operations and some of our suppliers are located in California and Asia, near major earthquake faults known for seismic activity. The manufacture of product components, the final assembly of our products and other critical operations are concentrated in certain geographic locations. We also rely on major logistics hubs primarily in Asia to manufacture and distribute our products, and primarily in the southwestern United States to import products into North and South America. Our operations and those of our significant suppliers and distributors could be adversely affected if manufacturing, logistics or other operations in these locations are disrupted for any reason, such as those listeddescribed above or other economic, business, labor, environmental, public health, regulatory or political issues. The ultimate impact on us, our significant suppliers, our distributors and our general infrastructure of being located near locations more vulnerable to the occurrence of the aforementioned business disruptions such as near major earthquake faults, and being consolidated in certain geographical areas is unknown and remains uncertain. Even if our operations are unaffected or recover quickly, if our customers cannot timely resume their own operations due to a catastrophic event, they may reduce or cancel their orders, which may adversely affect our results of operations.
Terrorist acts, conflicts, wars and geopolitical uncertainties may seriously harm our business and revenue, costs and expenses and financial condition and stock price.
Terrorist acts, conflicts or wars (wherever located around the world) may cause damage or disruption to our business, our employees, facilities, partners, suppliers, distributors, resellers or customers or adversely affect our ability to manage logistics, operate our transportation and communication systems or conduct certain other critical business operations. The potential for future attacks, the national and international responses to attacks or perceived threats to national security, and other actual or potential conflicts or wars have created many economic and political uncertainties. In addition, as a major multinational company with headquarters and significant operations located in the United States, actions against or by the United States may impact our business or employees. Although it is impossible to predict the occurrences or consequences of any suchthese events if they occur, they could otherwise result in a decrease in demand for our products, make it difficult or impossible to provide services or deliver products to our customers or to receive components from our suppliers, create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain and result in the need to impose employee travel restrictions. We are predominantly uninsured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts, conflicts and wars.
Failure to comply with our customer contracts or government contracting regulations couldwhich may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our contracts with our customers may include unique and specialized performance requirements. In particular, our contracts with federal, state, provincial and local governmental customers are subject to various procurement regulations, contract provisions and other requirements relating to their formation, administration and performance. Any failure by us to comply with the specific provisions in our customer contracts or any violation of government contracting regulations could result in the imposition of various civil and criminal penalties, which may include termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments and, in the case of our government contracts, fines and suspension from future government contracting. Such failures could also cause reputational damage to our business. In addition, Hewlett-Packard Company has in the past been, and we may in the future be, subject to qui tam litigation brought by private individuals on behalf of the government relating to our government contracts, which could include claims for treble damages. Further, any negative publicity related to our customer contracts or any proceedings surrounding them, regardless of its accuracy, may damage our business by affecting our ability to compete for new contracts. If our customer contracts are terminated, if we are suspended or disbarred from government work, or if our ability to compete for new contracts is adversely affected, our financial performance could suffer.
Unanticipated changes in our tax provisions, the adoption of new tax legislation or exposure to additional tax liabilities could affect our financial performance.
We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Our tax liabilities are affected by the amounts we charge in intercompany transactions for inventory, services, licenses, funding and other items. We are subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. Tax authorities may disagree with these intercompany transactions or other matters and may assess additional taxes or adjust taxable income on our tax returns as a result. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision. However, we cannot assure you that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the amounts ultimately paid upon resolution of audits could be materially different from the amounts previously included in our income tax expense and therefore could have a material impact on our tax provision, net income and cash flows.
Our effective tax rate in the future could be adversely affected by changes to our operating structure, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities or changes in tax laws or in their interpretation or enforcement. In addition, tax legislation has been introduced or is being considered in various jurisdictions that could significantly impact our tax rate, the carrying value of deferred tax assets, or our deferred tax liabilities. For example, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the “OECD”) has recently recommended changes to numerous long-standing international tax principles. If countries amend their tax laws to adopt certain parts of the OECD guidelines, this may increase tax uncertainty and may adversely impact our tax liabilities. Any of these changes could affect our financial performance.
Our business is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that could result in costs or other sanctions that adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations. There can be no assurance that such laws and regulations will not be changed in ways that will require us to modify our business models and objectives or affect our returns on investments by restricting existing activities and products, subjecting them to escalating costs or prohibiting them outright. For example, we are subject to laws, regulations and standards concerning environmental protection, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the clean-up of contaminated sites, the content of our products and the recycling, reuse, treatment and disposal of our products, including print supplies and batteries. In particular, we face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the chemical and materials composition of our products, their safe use, the energy consumption associated with those products, climate change laws and regulations, and product reparability, reuse and take-back legislation. If we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws or if our products become non-compliant with environmental laws, we could incur substantial costs or face other sanctions, which may include restrictions on our products entering certain jurisdictions. Our potential exposure includes fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage, personal injury claims and clean-up costs. Further, liability under some environmental laws relating to contaminated sites can be imposed retroactively, on a joint and several basis, and without any finding of noncompliance or fault. The amount and timing of costs to comply with environmental laws are difficult to predict.
Failure to maintain our credit ratings could adversely affect our liquidity, capital position, borrowing costs and access to capital markets.
Our credit risk is evaluated by the major independent rating agencies. Past downgrades of Hewlett-Packard Company’s ratings increased the cost of borrowing under our credit facilities and reduced market capacity for our commercial paper. Future
downgrades could have the same effects,effect, and could also require the posting of additional collateral under some of our derivative contracts. We cannot be assured that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings, and any additional actual or anticipated changes or downgrades in our credit ratings, including any announcement that our ratings are under further review for a downgrade, may further impact us in a similar manner and may have a negative impact on our liquidity, capital position and access to capital markets.
Our stock price has historically fluctuatedlevel of indebtedness and may continue to fluctuate, which may make future prices of our stock difficult to predict.
Our stock price, like that of other technology companies, can be volatile. Some of the factors thatrelated debt service obligations could adversely affect our stock price are:business and financial condition.
speculation, coverage or sentimentAs of October 31, 2020, we had an aggregate of $6.2 billion of outstanding indebtedness that will mature between fiscal year 2021 and fiscal year 2041 and we had availability under our revolving credit facility of $4.0 billion, availability under our 364-day revolving credit facility of $1.0 billion, and $725 million available from uncommitted lines of credit. We may also incur additional indebtedness in the media or the investment community about, or actual changes in, our business, strategic position, market share, organizational structure, operations, financial condition, financial reportingfuture. Our debt level and results, effectiveness of cost-cutting efforts, value or liquidity of our investments, exposure to market volatility, prospects, business combination or investment transactions, future stock price performance, board of directors, executive team, our competitors or our industry in general;
the announcement of new, planned or contemplated products, services, technological innovations, acquisitions, divestitures or other significant transactions by us or our competitors;
quarterly increases or decreases in net revenue, gross margin, earnings or cash flows, changes in estimates by the investment community or our financial outlook and variations between actual and estimated financial results;
announcements of actual and anticipated financial results by our competitors and other companies in the IT industry;
developments relating to pending investigations, claims and disputes;
developments relating to the acquisition proposal made to us by Xerox Holdings Corporation; and
the timing and amount of our share repurchases.
General or industry-specific market conditions or stock market performance or domestic or international macroeconomic and geopolitical factors unrelated to our performance also may affect the price of our stock. For these reasons, investors should not rely on recent or historical trends to predict future stock prices, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Additional volatility in the price of our securities could result in the filing of securities class action litigation matters, which could result in substantial costs and the diversion of management time and resources.
Some anti-takeover provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.
We have provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws each of whichrelated debt service obligations could have the effect, among other things, of rendering more difficultreducing our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions, and reducing funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, dividend repayments, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes. Moreover,
our indebtedness increases our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions. Further, we may be required to raise additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service obligations, debt refinancing, future acquisitions or discouraging an acquisition of HP deemed undesirableother general corporate purposes. Our ability to arrange additional financing or refinancing will depend on, among other factors, our financial position and performance, as well as prevailing market conditions and other factors beyond our control, and could be adversely impacted by our Board of Directors. These include provisions:
authorizing blank check preferred stock,debt level. Consequently, we may not be able to obtain additional financing or refinancing on terms acceptable to us, which we could issue with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superioradversely impact our ability to our common stock;
limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers;
specifying that our stockholders may take action only at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and otherwise in accordance with our bylaws and limiting the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings;
requiring advance notice of proposals by our stockholders for business to be conducted at stockholder meetings and for nominations of candidates for election to our Board of Directors; and
controlling the procedures for conduct of our Board of Directors and stockholder meetings and election, appointment and removal of our directors.
These provisions, alone or together, could deter or delay hostile takeovers, proxy contests and changes in control or our management. As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prevents some stockholders from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of substantially all ofservice our outstanding common stock.
Any provisionindebtedness or to repay our outstanding indebtedness as it becomes due and adversely impact our business and financial condition. Additionally, further borrowings may increase the risk of a future downgrade in our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control of HPcredit ratings, which could increase future debt costs and limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their sharesfuture availability of our stock and also could affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our stock.
We make estimates and assumptions in connection with the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements, and any changes to those estimates and assumptions could adversely affect our results of operations.
In connection with the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements, we use certain estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors. Our most critical accounting estimates are described in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this report. For example, we make significant estimates and assumptions when accounting for revenue recognition, taxes on earnings and restructuring and other charges. In addition, as discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we make certain estimates, including decisions related to provisions for legal proceedings and other contingencies. While we believe that these estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances, they are subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should any of these estimates and assumptions change or prove to have been incorrect, it could adversely affect our results of operations.operations and financial condition.
Risks RelatedLEGAL AND REGULATORY RISKS
Our business is subject to the Separation
The allocation of IP rights between Hewlett Packard Enterprisevarious federal, state, local and HP as part of the Separation,foreign laws and the shared use of certain IP rights following the Separation,regulations that could adversely impact our reputation, our ability to enforce certain IP rightsresult in costs or other sanctions that are important to us and our competitive position.
In connection with the Separation, Hewlett-Packard Company allocated to each of Hewlett Packard Enterprise and HP the IP assets relevant to their respective businesses. The terms of the Separation include cross-licenses and other arrangements to provide for certain ongoing use of IP in the existing operations of both businesses. For example, through a joint brand holding structure, both Hewlett Packard Enterprise and HP will retain the ability to make ongoing use of certain variations of the legacy Hewlett-Packard and HP branding, respectively. There is a risk that the joint brand holding structure may impair the enforcement of HP’s trademark rights against third parties that infringe them. Furthermore, as a result of this shared use of the legacy branding, there is a risk that conduct or events adversely affecting the reputation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise could also adversely affect the reputation of HP. In addition, as a result of the allocation of IP as part of the Separation, we no longer own IP allocated to Hewlett Packard Enterprise and our resulting IP ownership position could adversely affect our positionbusiness and options relating to patent enforcement, patent licensingresults of operations and cross-licensing, our ability to sell our products or services, our competitive position in the industry and our ability to enter new product markets.
The Separation could result in substantial tax liability.cash flows.
We obtained an opinion of outside counsel that, for U.S.are subject to various federal, income tax purposes, the Separation qualified, for both the companystate, local and our stockholders, as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Sections 368(d)(1)(D)foreign laws and 355 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In addition, we obtained a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and opinions of outside counsel regarding certain matters impacting the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Separation for the company and certain related transactions as transactions that are generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The opinions of outside counsel and the IRS private letter ruling were based, among other things, on various factual assumptions we have authorized and representations we have made to outside counsel and the IRS. If any of these assumptions or representations are, or become, inaccurate or incomplete, reliance on the opinions and IRS private letter ruling may be affected. An opinion of outside counsel represents their legal judgment but is not binding on the IRS or any court. Accordingly, thereregulations. There can be no assurance that the IRSsuch laws and regulations will not challenge the conclusions reflectedbe changed in the opinionsways that will require us to modify our business models and objectives or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the Separationaffect our returns on investments by restricting existing activities and products, subjecting them to escalating costs or certain internal transactions undertaken in anticipation of the Separation are determined to be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes,prohibiting them outright. For example, we and/or our stockholders that are subject to U.S.environmental laws, regulations and standards, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the clean-up of contaminated sites, the content of our products and the recycling, reuse, treatment and disposal of our products, including print supplies and batteries. In particular, we face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the chemical and materials composition of our products, their safe use, the energy consumption associated with those products, climate change laws and regulations, and product repairability, reuse and take-back legislation. If we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws or if our products become non-compliant with environmental laws, we could incur substantial costs or face other sanctions, which may include restrictions on our products entering certain jurisdictions. Our potential exposure includes fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage, personal injury claims and clean-up costs. Further, liability under some environmental laws relating to contaminated sites can be imposed retroactively, on a joint and several basis, and without any finding of noncompliance or fault. The amount and timing of costs to comply with environmental laws are difficult to predict. Moreover, we are expected to become increasingly subject to laws, regulations and international treaties relating to climate change, such as carbon pricing or product energy efficiency requirements. As these new laws, regulations, treaties and similar initiatives and programs are adopted and implemented, we will be required to comply or potentially face market access limitations or other sanctions, including fines.
We are subject to risks associated with litigation and regulatory proceedings.
We face legal claims or regulatory matters involving stockholder, consumer, competition, commercial, IP, employment, and other issues on a global basis. There is an increasingly active litigation and regulatory environment, including but not limited to employment and patent-monetization claims in the United States and litigation and regulatory matters focused on consumer protection, privacy, and competition regulation globally. As described in Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, we are engaged in a number of litigation and regulatory matters that may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations, if decided adversely to or settled by us. Litigation and regulatory proceedings are inherently uncertain, and adverse rulings have occurred and may occur, including awards of monetary damages, imposition of fines, issuance of injunctions or cease-and-desist orders directing us to cease engaging in certain business practices, cease manufacturing or selling certain products, requiring the compulsory licensing of patents, or requiring other remedies. An unfavorable outcome may result in a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. In addition, regardless of the outcome, litigation and regulatory proceedings can be costly, time-consuming, disruptive to our operations, and distracting to management.
Failure to comply with our customer contracts or government contracting regulations could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
Our contracts with our customers may include unique and specialized performance requirements. In particular, our contracts with federal, state, provincial and local governmental customers are subject to procurement regulations, contract provisions and other requirements relating to their formation, administration and performance. Any failure by us to comply with the specific provisions in our customer contracts or any violation of government contracting regulations could result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties, which may include termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments and, in the case of our government contracts, fines and suspension from future government contracting. Such failures could also cause reputational damage to our business. In addition, Hewlett-Packard Company has in the past been, and we may in the future be, subject to qui tam litigation brought by private individuals on behalf of the government relating to our government contracts, which could include claims for treble damages. Further, any negative publicity related to our customer contracts or any proceedings surrounding them, regardless of its accuracy, may damage our business by affecting our ability to compete for new contracts. Additionally, some of our agreements with governmental customers may be subject to periodic funding approval. Funding reductions or delays could adversely impact public sector demand for our products and services. If our customer contracts are terminated, if we are suspended or disbarred from government work, or if our ability to compete for new contracts is adversely affected, our financial performance could suffer.
Unanticipated changes in our tax provisions, the adoption of new tax legislation or exposure to additional tax liabilities could affect our financial performance.
We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Our tax liabilities are affected by the amounts we charge in intercompany transactions for inventory, services, licenses, funding and other items. We are subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. Tax authorities may disagree with these intercompany transactions or other matters and may assess additional taxes or adjust taxable income on our tax returns as a result. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision. However, we may not accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the amounts ultimately paid upon resolution of audits could be materially different from the amounts previously included in our income tax expense and therefore could incur significant U.S. federalhave a material impact on our tax provision, net income and cash flows.
Our effective tax rate in the future could be adversely affected by changes to our operating structure, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities or changes in tax laws or in their interpretation or enforcement. In addition, tax legislation has been introduced or is being considered in various jurisdictions that could significantly impact our tax rate, the carrying value of deferred tax assets, or our deferred tax liabilities. Any of these changes could affect our financial performance.
RISKS RELATED TO THE SEPARATION
We or Hewlett Packard Enterprise may fail to perform under the transaction agreements executed as part of the Separation.
In connection with the Separation, we and Hewlett Packard Enterprise entered into several agreements, including among others a separation and distribution agreement and an employee matters agreement. The separation and distribution agreement and employee matters agreement determine the allocation of assets and liabilities between the companies following the Separation for those respective areas and include any necessary indemnifications related to liabilities and obligations. Hewlett Packard Enterprise has spun off or separated certain of its businesses since the Separation, and some of its obligations under these and other agreements have transferred to the successor entities. We will rely on Hewlett Packard Enterprise or its successor entities to satisfy their performance and payment obligations under these agreements. If Hewlett Packard Enterprise or its successor entities has separated are unable to satisfy their obligations under these agreements, we could incur operational difficulties or losses that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
ITEM 2. Properties.
As of October 31, 2019,2020, we owned or leased approximately 18.319.0 million square feet of space worldwide, a summary of which is provided below. | | | | Fiscal year ended October 31, 2019 | | Fiscal year ended October 31, 2020 |
| | Owned | | Leased | | Total | | Owned | | Leased | | Total |
| | (square feet in millions) | | (square feet in millions) |
| Administration and support | 2.0 |
| | 6.5 |
| | 8.5 |
| Administration and support | 2.0 | | | 6.4 | | | 8.4 | |
| (Percentage) | 24 | % | | 76 | % | | 100 | % | (Percentage) | 24 | % | | 76 | % | | 100 | % |
| Core data centers, manufacturing plants, research and development facilities and warehouse operations | 2.5 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 8.5 |
| Core data centers, manufacturing plants, research and development facilities and warehouse operations | 2.6 | | | 6.7 | | | 9.3 | |
| (Percentage) | 29 | % | | 71 | % | | 100 | % | (Percentage) | 28 | % | | 72 | % | | 100 | % |
Total(1) | 4.5 |
| | 12.5 |
| | 17.0 |
| Total(1) | 4.6 | | | 13.1 | | | 17.7 | |
| (Percentage) | 26 | % | | 74 | % | | 100 | % | (Percentage) | 26 | % | | 74 | % | | 100 | % |
| |
(1)(1)Excludes 1.3 million square feet of vacated space, of which 0.8 million square feet is leased to third parties. | Excludes 1.3 million square feet of vacated space, of which 0.9 million square feet is leased to third parties. |
We believe that our existing properties are in good condition and are suitable for the conduct of our business. Each of our segments Personal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments uses each of the properties at least in part, and we retain the flexibility to use each of the properties in whole or in part for each of the segments.
Principal Executive Offices
Our principal executive offices, including our global headquarters, which we lease, are located at 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California, United States.
Headquarters of Geographic Operations
The locations of our geographic headquarters are as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Americas | | Europe, Middle East, Africa | | Asia Pacific |
| Palo Alto, United States | | Geneva, Switzerland | | Singapore |
Product Development and Manufacturing
The locations of our major product development, manufacturing, data centers and HP Labs facilities are as follows: |
| | | | | | | |
Americas United States—Corvallis, San Diego, Boise, Vancouver, Spring, Fort Collins, Aguadilla, Puerto Rico | | Europe, Middle East, Africa Israel—Kiryat-Gat, Rehovot, Netanya
Spain—Barcelona |
Asia Pacific China—Weihai, Chongqing, Shanghai India—Pantnagar, Bangalore
Malaysia—Penang Singapore—Singapore
South Korea—Suwon
Taiwan—Taipei
| | Technology office (HP Labs) United Kingdom—Bristol
United States—Palo Alto
|
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.
Information with respect to this item may be found in Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol HPQ.
For information about dividends, see Item 6, “Selected Financial Data” and Note 12, “Stockholders’ Deficit” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
As of November 30, 2019,2020, there were approximately 57,91856,084 stockholders of record.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities in fiscal year 2019.2020.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs |
| | In thousands, except per share amounts |
| Period | | | | | | |
| August 2019 | 7,109 |
| | $ | 19.15 |
| 7,109 |
| | $ | 1,823,046 |
|
| September 2019 | 7,908 |
| | $ | 18.66 |
| 7,908 |
| | $ | 6,675,457 |
|
| October 2019 | 10,253 |
| | $ | 17.25 |
| 10,253 |
| | $ | 6,498,622 |
|
| Total | 25,270 |
| |
| 25,270 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average
Price Paid
per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs |
| In thousands, except per share amounts |
| Period | | | | | | |
| August 2020 | 18,993 | | | $ | 18.18 | | 18,993 | | | $ | 13,673,430 | |
| September 2020 | 24,274 | | | $ | 19.08 | | 24,274 | | | $ | 13,210,200 | |
| October 2020 | 27,767 | | | $ | 19.11 | | 27,767 | | | $ | 12,679,450 | |
| Total | 71,034 | | | | 71,034 | | | |
On June 19, 2018, HP’s Board of Directors authorized $4.0 billion for future repurchases of its outstanding shares of common stock. On September 30, 2019, the Board authorized an additional $5.0 billion for future repurchases of its outstanding shares of common stock. ThisThe Company’s share repurchase program, which does not have a specific expiration date, authorizes repurchases in the open market or in private transactions. On February 22, 2020, HP’s Board of Directors increased HP’s remaining share repurchase authorization to $15.0 billion in total. HP intends to use repurchases from time to time to offset the dilution created by shares issued under employee stock plans and to repurchase shares opportunistically.opportunistically as part of a robust share repurchase program. HP expects to continue share repurchases at an elevated level of at least $1.0 billion per quarter in the coming quarters, unless higher return opportunities emerge. All share repurchases settled in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 20192020 were open market transactions. As of October 31, 2019,2020, HP had approximately $6.5$12.7 billion remaining under the share repurchase authorizations.
Stock Performance Graph and Cumulative Total Return
The graph below shows the cumulative total stockholder return assuming the investment of $100 at the market close on October 31, 20142015 (and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter) in each of HP common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and the S&P Information Technology Index. The comparisons in the graph below are based on historical data and are not indicative of, or intended to forecast, future performance of our common stock.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 10/14 | | 10/15 | | 10/16 | | 10/17 | | 10/18 | | 10/19 |
HP Inc.(1) | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 76.72 |
| | $ | 94.44 |
| | $ | 144.77 |
| | $ | 166.11 |
| | $ | 123.40 |
|
| S&P 500 Index | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 105.19 |
| | $ | 109.93 |
| | $ | 135.89 |
| | $ | 145.86 |
| | $ | 166.75 |
|
| S&P Information Technology Index | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 111.19 |
| | $ | 123.23 |
| | $ | 171.24 |
| | $ | 192.31 |
| | $ | 235.74 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 10/15 | | 10/16 | | 10/17 | | 10/18 | | 10/19 | | 10/20 |
HP Inc.(1) | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 123.10 | | | $ | 188.69 | | | $ | 216.50 | | | $ | 160.83 | | | $ | 172.49 | |
| S&P 500 Index | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 104.50 | | | $ | 129.19 | | | $ | 138.66 | | | $ | 158.52 | | | $ | 173.89 | |
| S&P Information Technology Index | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 110.83 | | | $ | 154.00 | | | $ | 172.95 | | | $ | 212.01 | | | $ | 285.12 | |
(1) Historical stock prices of HP Inc. prior to the Separation, which occurred on November 1, 2015, have been adjusted to reflect the impact of the Separation. The adjustment was established using the conversion ratio based on the market value of stock on the Separation close at October 31, 2015.
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data.
The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future continuing operations and should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are incorporated herein by reference, in order to understand further the factors that may affect the comparability of the financial data presented below.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Selected Financial Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | In millions, except per share amounts |
| Net revenue | $ | 56,639 | | | $ | 58,756 | | | $ | 58,472 | | | $ | 52,056 | | | $ | 48,238 | |
| Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 3,462 | | | $ | 3,877 | | | $ | 3,831 | | | $ | 3,368 | | | $ | 3,549 | |
| Net loss from discontinued operations net of taxes | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (170) | |
| Net earnings | $ | 2,844 | | | $ | 3,152 | | | $ | 5,327 | | | $ | 2,526 | | | $ | 2,496 | |
| Net earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | 2.01 | | | $ | 2.08 | | | $ | 3.30 | | | $ | 1.50 | | | $ | 1.54 | |
| Discontinued operations | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.10) | |
| Total basic net earnings per share | $ | 2.01 | | | $ | 2.08 | | | $ | 3.30 | | | $ | 1.50 | | | $ | 1.44 | |
| Diluted | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | 2.07 | | | $ | 3.26 | | | $ | 1.48 | | | $ | 1.53 | |
| Discontinued operations | — | | | — | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.10) | |
| Total diluted net earnings per share | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | 2.07 | | | $ | 3.26 | | | $ | 1.48 | | | $ | 1.43 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.70 | | | $ | 0.64 | | | $ | 0.56 | | | $ | 0.53 | | | $ | 0.50 | |
| At year-end: | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 34,681 | | | $ | 33,467 | | | $ | 34,622 | | | $ | 32,913 | | | $ | 28,987 | |
Long-term debt(1) | $ | 5,543 | | | $ | 4,780 | | | $ | 4,524 | | | $ | 6,747 | | | $ | 6,735 | |
(1) The increase in Long-term debt in fiscal year 2020 was due to issuance of unsecured senior debt of $3.0 billion in aggregate principal amount partially offset by payment of $1.6 billion for the repurchase and redemption of existing notes. The decrease in Long-term debt in fiscal year 2018 was due to the payment for the repurchase of approximately $1.85 billion in aggregate principal amount of U.S. Dollar Global Notes.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | In millions, except per share amounts |
| Net revenue | $ | 58,756 |
| | $ | 58,472 |
| | $ | 52,056 |
| | $ | 48,238 |
| | $ | 51,463 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations(1) | $ | 3,877 |
| | $ | 3,831 |
| | $ | 3,368 |
| | $ | 3,549 |
| | $ | 3,920 |
|
| Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations net of taxes | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (170 | ) | | $ | 836 |
|
Net earnings(1) | $ | 3,152 |
| | $ | 5,327 |
| | $ | 2,526 |
| | $ | 2,496 |
| | $ | 4,554 |
|
| Net earnings per share: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Continuing operations | $ | 2.08 |
| | $ | 3.30 |
| | $ | 1.50 |
| | $ | 1.54 |
| | $ | 2.05 |
|
| Discontinued operations | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.10 | ) | | $ | 0.46 |
|
| Total basic net earnings per share | $ | 2.08 |
| | $ | 3.30 |
| | $ | 1.50 |
| | $ | 1.44 |
| | $ | 2.51 |
|
| Diluted | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Continuing operations | $ | 2.07 |
| | $ | 3.26 |
| | $ | 1.48 |
| | $ | 1.53 |
| | $ | 2.02 |
|
| Discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | $ | (0.10 | ) | | $ | 0.46 |
|
| Total diluted net earnings per share | $ | 2.07 |
| | $ | 3.26 |
| | $ | 1.48 |
| | $ | 1.43 |
| | $ | 2.48 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.53 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | 0.67 |
|
| At year-end: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Total assets(2) | $ | 33,467 |
| | $ | 34,622 |
| | $ | 32,913 |
| | $ | 28,987 |
| | $ | 106,853 |
|
Long-term debt(3) | $ | 4,780 |
| | $ | 4,524 |
| | $ | 6,747 |
| | $ | 6,735 |
| | $ | 6,648 |
|
| |
(1)
| Earnings from continuing operations and net earnings include the following items: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | In millions |
| Restructuring and other charges | $ | 275 |
| | $ | 132 |
| | $ | 362 |
| | $ | 205 |
| | $ | 63 |
|
| Acquisition-related charges | 35 |
| | 123 |
| | 125 |
| | 7 |
| | 1 |
|
| Amortization of intangible assets | 116 |
| | 80 |
| | 1 |
| | 16 |
| | 102 |
|
| Total charges before taxes | $ | 426 |
| | $ | 335 |
| | $ | 488 |
| | $ | 228 |
| | $ | 166 |
|
| Total charges, net of taxes | $ | 334 |
| | $ | 258 |
| | $ | 362 |
| | $ | 161 |
| | $ | 137 |
|
| |
| Total assets for fiscal year 2015 include the total assets of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. |
| |
(3)
| The decrease in Long-term debt in fiscal year 2018 was due to the payment for the repurchase of approximately $1.85 billion in aggregate principal amount of U.S. Dollar Global Notes. |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is organized as follows:
| |
• | •Overview. A discussion of our business and other highlights affecting the company to provide context for the remainder of this MD&A. •Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. A discussion of accounting policies and estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results. •Results of Operations. An analysis of our financial results comparing fiscal year 2020 to fiscal year 2019 and fiscal year 2019 to fiscal year 2018. A discussion of the results of operations is followed by a more detailed discussion of the results of operations by segment. •Liquidity and Capital Resources. An analysis of changes in our cash flows and a discussion of our liquidity and financial condition. •A discussion of our business and other highlights affecting the company to provide context for the remainder of this MD&A. |
| |
• | Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. A discussion of accounting policies and estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results.
|
| |
• | Results of Operations. An analysis of our financial results comparing fiscal year 2019 to fiscal year 2018 and fiscal year 2018 to fiscal year 2017. A discussion of the results of operations is followed by a more detailed discussion of the results of operations by segment.
|
| |
• | Liquidity and Capital Resources. An analysis of changes in our cash flows and a discussion of our liquidity and financial condition.
|
| |
• | Contractual and Other Obligations. An overview of contractual obligations, retirement and post-retirement benefit plan contributions, cost-saving plans, uncertain tax positions and off-balance sheet arrangements. |
The discussion of financial condition and results of our operations that follows provides information that will assist the reader in understanding our Consolidated Financial Statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from year to year, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect our Consolidated Financial Statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
OVERVIEW
We are a leading global provider of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, solutions, and services. We sell to individual consumers, SMBs and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health, and education sectors. We have three reportable segments: Personal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments. The Personal Systems segment offers commercial and consumer desktop and notebook PCs, workstations, thin clients, commercial mobility devices, retail POS systems, displays and other related accessories, software, support, and services. The Printing segment provides consumer and commercial printer hardware, supplies, solutions and services, as well as scanning devices. Corporate Investments include HP Labs and certain business incubation and investment projects.
•In Personal Systems, our strategic focus is on profitable growth through innovation and market segmentationsegmentation. This focus is with respect to enhanced innovation in multi-operating systems, multi-architecture, geography, customer segments and other key attributes. Additionally, we are investing in end pointendpoint services and solutions. We are focused on services, including DaaSDevice as a Service, as the market begins to shift to contractual solutions. We are driving innovation to enable productivity and collaboration as near-term demand continues for work from home and distance learning as the PC has become an essential tool to create, consume and collaborate. We believe that we are well positioned due to our competitive product lineup.
•In Printing, our strategic focus is on Contractualcontractual solutions to serve consumers, SMBs and Graphics,large enterprises through our Instant Ink Services and Managed Print Services (“MPS”) offerings, providing digital printing solutions for graphics segments and applications including commercial publishing, labels, packaging and textiles; as well as expanding our footprint in the 3D printing andacross digital manufacturing marketplace. In Contractual solutions we have a continued focus on Managed Print Services and Instant Ink. In Graphics, we are focused on innovations such as our Indigo and Latex product offerings.strategic applications.
We continue to experience challenges that are representative of trends and uncertainties that may affect our business and results of operations. One set of challenges relates to dynamic market trends, such as forecasted declining PC Client markets and home printing markets. A second set of challenges relates to changes in the competitive landscape. Our primary competitors are exerting competitive pressure in targeted areas and are entering new markets, our emerging competitors are introducing new technologies and business models, and our alliance partners in some businesses are increasingly becoming our competitors in others. A third set of challenges relates to business model changes and our go-to-market execution in an evolving distribution and reseller landscape, with increasing online and omnichannel presence. Additional challenges we face at the segment level are set forth below.
•In Personal Systems, we face challenges with industry component availability and a competitive pricing environment.
•In Printing, a competitive pricing environment, including from non-original supplies (which includes imitation, refill or remanufactured alternatives), and a weakened market in certain geographies with associated pricing sensitivity of our customers present challenges. We also face challenges in Printing due to our multi-tier distribution network, primarily in EMEA, including limiting grey marketing and the potential misuse of pricing programs. We also obtain many Printing components from single sources due to technology, availability, price, quality or other considerations. For instance, we source the majority of our A4 and a portion of our A3 portfolio of laser printer engines and laser toner cartridges from Canon. Any decision by either party to not renew our agreement with Canon or to limit or reduce the scope of the agreement could adversely affect our net revenue from LaserJet products; however, we have a long-standing business relationship with Canon and anticipate renewal of this agreement.
Our business and financial performance also depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions. Accordingly, we face global macroeconomic challenges, particularly in light of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic as discussed below, tariff-driven headwinds, uncertainty in the markets, volatility in exchange rates weaker macroeconomic conditions and evolving dynamics in the global trade environment. The full impact of these and other global macroeconomic challenges on our business cannot be known at this time.
To address these challenges, we continue to pursue innovation with a view towards developing new products and services aligned with generating market demand and meeting the needs of our customers and partners. In addition, we continue to work on improving our operations and adapting our business models, with a particular focus on enhancing our end-to-end processes, analytics and efficiencies. We also continue to work on optimizing our sales coverage models, aligning our sales incentives with our strategic goals, improving channel execution and inventory management, strengthening our capabilities in our areas of strategic focus, strengthening our pricing discipline, and developing and capitalizing on market opportunities.
Specifically, in October 2019, we announced cost-reduction and operational efficiency initiatives intended to simplify the way we work, move closer to our customers and facilitate specific investment in our business. These were further updated in February 2020. These efforts includeincluded transforming our operating model to integrate our sales force into a single commercial organization and reducing structural costs across the companyCompany through our restructuring plan approved in September 2019 (the “Fiscal 2020 Plan”). We expect to invest some of the savings from these efforts across our businesses, including investing to
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
build our digital capabilities. Over time, we expect these investments will make us more efficient and allow us to advance our positions in Personal Systems and Printing, while also disrupting new industries where we see attractive medium to long-term growth opportunities. However, the rate at which we are able to invest in our business and the returns that we are able to achieve from these investments will be
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
affected by many factors, including the efforts to address the execution, industry and macroeconomic challenges facing our business as discussed above. As a result, we may experience delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to these efforts, and the anticipated benefits of these efforts may not materialize.
We typically experience higher net revenues in our fourth quarter compared to other quarters in our fiscal year due in part to seasonal holiday demand. Historical seasonal patterns should not be considered reliable indicators of our future net revenues or financial performance.
Our COVID-19 Response
In late 2019, COVID-19 was first identified, and in March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 to be a pandemic. The rapid spread of COVID-19 prompted governments and businesses to take unprecedented measures in response, including restrictions on travel and business operations, temporary closures of businesses, and quarantines and shelter-in-place orders.
As reflected in the discussions that follow, the COVID-19 pandemic and the actions taken by governments, businesses and individuals in response to the pandemic have had a variety of impacts on our results of operations and cash flows for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2020, some of which have been significant. This section summarizes our response to the significant impacts that we have experienced to date, and we have also included additional details as applicable throughout other sections of this report. We continue to actively monitor the situation and review our plans based on the requirements and recommendations of federal, state, and local authorities.
•Our employees.We have been focused on protecting the health and safety of our employees during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we quickly pivoted the vast majority of our employees to work from home as a safety measure in the second quarter of fiscal year 2020. These arrangements have been designed to allow for continued operation of non-production business-critical functions, including financial reporting systems and internal controls. In the third quarter of fiscal year 2020, we implemented a one-time work-from-home reimbursement program for employees to improve their workspaces. For those in manufacturing and other critical functions that could not transition to a remote model, we quickly implemented safety and hygiene training and protocols, such as physical distancing, safety gear mandates, site visitor restrictions, alternate staffing shifts, and enhanced cleaning and sanitization practices, to protect the employees in our labs or manufacturing and production facilities. We have also implemented contact tracing initiatives.
•Our community. We are committed to taking actions to protect the communities we serve. We are also putting our resources behind efforts to support local communities and to assist in the public health response. We have donated millions of dollars in technology and support across Personal Systems and Printing to help students, families, and communities, including hospitals in affected areas.
◦The HP 3D Printing team and Digital Manufacturing team is working with its global digital manufacturing community to mobilize 3D printing teams, technology, experience and production capacity to help deliver critical parts in the effort to battle the COVID-19 pandemic. Along with our partners and customers, we have produced more than 4 million 3D printed parts for face shields, respirators, nasal swabs, and other items for distribution to hospitals.
◦We have donated HP BioPrinters and associated supply cassettes, free of charge, to research laboratories in the US and Europe to help accelerate drug and vaccine research to combat COVID-19.
◦In April 2020, HP Puerto Rico kicked off large-scale manufacturing of much-needed hand sanitizer and has since delivered about 55,000 liters to local hospitals, police stations, nursing homes, fire stations, medical and wellness service providers and HP’s Customer Service facilities, as well as to select sites in the US.
◦We made HP Sure Click Pro security software freely available through September 2020 to help protect against cyber threats for both HP and non-HP Windows 10 PCs as a large portion of the population is currently working from home.
◦We have committed to donating millions of dollars in products and grants to support blended learning in local communities impacted by COVID-19 around the globe as a large portion of the world’s students are currently learning from home.
•Our customers and partners. We are committed to our customers and partners and to meeting their needs. We have taken meaningful actions to remain close to our customers and partners, including implementing a variety
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
of relief initiatives to help them navigate their operational and financial challenges. We had provided a variety of financing and leasing options for end customers. We had provided short-term market and country-specific incentives for partners. HP has implemented a more predictable, flat-rate incentive program and relaxed compensation models, and has also expanded its virtual engagement options, including free access to cybersecurity support and on-demand training. Partners can opt in for customized online digital learning paths designed to meet their specific priorities. We are also introducing programs, designed to enable our customers and partners to adapt to the current work environment, such as the HP Managed Print Cloud Services and the HP Flexworker Solutions program.
•Supply chain. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2020, we experienced disruptions in our manufacturing and supply chain. This included temporary factory closures in China and Southeast Asia that impacted our own factories as well as those of our suppliers and outsourcing partners, resulting in higher costs and temporary supply shortages. Manufacturing capacity returned largely to normalized levels by the end of fiscal year 2020. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, we managed through ongoing logistics and industrywide component availability challenges due to strong demand.
•Demand. COVID-19 has created new and different demand dynamics in the market. This is creating both challenges and opportunities across our businesses and geographies. In Personal Systems, we saw increased demand globally as the focus moved to keeping people connected, productive and secure and it reemphasized the essential role that the PC plays in everyday life. We also saw a mix shift in demand from Commercial to Consumer, Desktops to Notebooks driven by strength in Chromebooks and Education. In Printing, we saw a slowdown in Office and Graphics as offices remain closed and large events continue to be canceled. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, we saw some progress in Commercial print driven by improved performance in the SMBs sector. We expect a gradual recovery in the overall Commercial print market although that recovery may be uneven given the varying pace of economic recovery and the resurgence of COVID-19 cases in some countries. We also continue to see increased demand for hardware and ink supplies on the Consumer Printing side as customers set up home office for remote working and school environment for remote learning. We expect that the strength in Consumer Printing will gradually subside when more offices and schools reopen.
•Liquidity. The extent and duration of the disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic remain uncertain. As a result, our liquidity and working capital needs may be impacted in future periods. We believe that our businesses are strong cash flow generators and we maintain a strong balance sheet to meet our liquidity needs. We believe our current cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operating activities, available commercial paper authorization, new borrowings, and our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our operating cash requirements, planned capital expenditures, interest and principal payments on all borrowings, pension and post-retirement funding requirements, authorized share repurchases and annual dividend payments for the foreseeable future.
The full extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial position is currently uncertain and will depend on many factors that are not within our control, including, but not limited to: the duration and scope of the pandemic; the effectiveness of actions taken to contain or mitigate the pandemic and prevent or limit any reoccurrence; governmental, business and individuals’ actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the pandemic; general economic uncertainty in key global markets and financial market volatility; global economic conditions and levels of economic growth; and the pace of recovery when the COVID-19 pandemic subsides. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about related risks and uncertainties.
Unsolicited Exchange Offer
On March 2, 2020, Xerox Holdings Corporation (“Xerox”) commenced an unsolicited exchange offer for all outstanding shares of HP’s common stock (the “Offer”). Xerox had also previously nominated candidates for election to HP’s Board of Directors at HP’s 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. On March 31, 2020, Xerox announced that the Offer had been terminated and subsequently withdrew its slate of director nominees. In order to respond to Xerox’s actions, HP incurred certain costs during the year ended October 31, 2020.
For a further discussion of trends, uncertainties and other factors that could impact our operating results, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
General
The Consolidated Financial Statements of HP are prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which require management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. As of October 31, 2020, the impact of COVID-19 on our business continued to unfold. As a result, many of our estimates and assumptions required increased judgment and may carry a higher degree of variability and volatility. As events continue to evolve and additional information becomes available, our estimates may change in future periods. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of HP’s Board of Directors. Management believes that the accounting estimates employed and the resulting amounts are reasonable; however, actual results may differ from these estimates. Making estimates and judgments about future events is inherently unpredictable and is subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should any of these estimates and assumptions change or prove to have been incorrect, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 1, “Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, if different estimates reasonably could have been used, or if changes in the estimate that are reasonably possible could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect the significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue depicting the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we are expected to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We evaluate customers’ ability to pay based on various factors like historical payment experience, financial metrics and customer credit scores.
We enter into contracts to sell our products and services, and while many of our sales contracts contain standard terms and conditions, there are contracts which contain non-standard terms and conditions. Further, many of our arrangements include multiple performance obligations. As a result, significant contract interpretation may be required to determine the appropriate accounting, including the identification of performance obligations that are distinct, the allocation of the transaction price among performance obligations in the arrangement and the timing of transfer of control of promised goods or services for each of those performance obligations.
We evaluate each performance obligation in an arrangement to determine whether it represents a distinct good or services. A performance obligation constitutes distinct goods or services when the customer can benefit from the goods or services either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer and the performance obligation is distinct within the context of the contract.
Transaction price is the amount of consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to the customer. If the transaction price includes a variable amount, we estimate the amount using either the expected value or most likely amount method. We reduce the transaction price at the time of revenue recognition for customer and distributor programs and incentive offerings, rebates, promotions, other volume-based incentives and expected returns. We use estimates to determine the expected variable consideration for such programs based on historical experience, expected consumer behavior and market conditions.
When a sales arrangement contains multiple performance obligations, such as hardware and/or services, we allocate revenue to each performance obligation in proportion to their selling price. The selling price for each performance obligation is based on its standalone selling priceStandalone Selling Price (“SSP”). We establish SSP using the price charged for a performance obligation when sold
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
separately (“observable price”) and, in some instances, using the price established by management having the relevant authority. When observable price is not available, we establish SSP based on management’s judgment considering internal factors such as margin objectives, pricing practices and controls, customer segment pricing strategies and the product life-cycle. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies and technology industry life cycles. We may modify or develop new go-to-market practices in the future, which may result in changes in selling prices, impacting standalone selling price determination applying the aforementioned management judgments and estimates. This may change the pattern and timing of revenue recognition for identical arrangements executed in future periods but will not change the total
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
revenue recognized for any given arrangement. In most arrangements with multiple performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation at the inception of the arrangement based on their relative selling price.
Revenue is recognized when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied by transferring control of a promised good or service to a customer. We generally invoice the customer upon delivery of the goods or services and the payments are due as per contract terms. For fixed pricefixed-price support or maintenance and other service contracts that are in the nature of stand-ready obligations, payments are generally received in advance from customers and revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the duration of the contract. In instances when revenue is derived from sales of third-party vendor products or services, we record revenue on a gross basis when we are a principal in the transaction and on a net basis when we are acting as an agent between the customer and the vendor. We consider several factors to determine whether we are acting as a principal or an agent, most notably whether we are the primary obligor to the customer, have established our own pricing and have inventory and credit risks.
Warranty
We accrue the estimated cost of product warranties at the time we recognize revenue. We evaluate our warranty obligations on a product group basis. Our standard product warranty terms generally include post-sales support and repairs or replacement of a product at no additional charge for a specified period. While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers, we base our estimated warranty obligation on contractual warranty terms, repair costs, product call rates, average cost per call, current period product shipments and ongoing product failure rates, as well as specific product class failure outside of our baseline experience. Warranty terms generally range from 90 days to three years for parts, labor and onsite services, depending upon the product. Over the last three fiscal years, the annual warranty expense andIf actual warrantyproduct failure rates or repair costs have averaged approximately 1.8% of annual net revenue.
Restructuring and Other Charges
We have engaged in restructuring actions which require management to estimate the timing and amount of severance and other employee separation costs for workforce reduction and enhanced early retirement programs, fair value of assets made redundant or obsolete, and the fair value of lease cancellation and other exit costs. We accrue for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that benefits will be paid and the amount is reasonably estimable. The rates used in determining severance accruals are based on existing plans, historical experiences and negotiated settlements. Other charges include non-recurring costs that are distinctdiffer from ongoing operational costs incurred in connection with the Separation or information technology rationalization efforts. For a full description of our restructuring actions, refer to our discussions of restructuring in “Results of Operations” below and in Note 3, “Restructuring and Other Charges”estimates, revisions to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.estimated warranty obligation may be required.
Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefits
Our pension and other post-retirement benefit costs and obligations depend on various assumptions. Our major assumptions relate primarily to discount rates, mortality rates, expected increases in compensation levels and the expected long-term return on plan assets. The discount rate assumption is based on current investment yields of high-quality fixed-income securities with maturities similar to the expected benefits payment period. Mortality rates help predict the expected life of plan participants and are based on a historical demographic study of the plan. The expected increase in the compensation levels assumption reflects our long-term actual experience and future expectations. The expected long-term return on plan assets is determined based on asset allocations, historical portfolio results, historical asset correlations and management’s expected returns for each asset class. We evaluate our expected return assumptions annually including reviewing current capital market assumptions to assess the reasonableness of the expected long-term return on plan assets. We update the expected long-term return on assets when we observe a sufficient level of evidence that would suggest the long-term expected return has changed. In any fiscal year, significant differences may arise between the actual return and the expected long-term return on plan assets. Historically, differences between the actual return and expected long-term return on plan assets have resulted from changes in target or actual asset allocation, short-term performance relative to expected long-term performance, and to a lesser extent, differences between target and actual investment allocations, the timing of benefit payments compared to expectations, and the use of derivatives intended to effect asset allocation changes or hedge certain investment or liability exposures. For the
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
recognition of net periodic benefit cost, the calculation of the expected long-term return on plan assets uses the fair value of plan assets as of the beginning of the fiscal year unless updated as a result of interim re-measurement.
Our major assumptions vary by plan, and the weighted-average rates used are set forth in Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. The following table provides the impact a change of 25 basis points in each of the weighted-average assumptions of the discount rate, expected increase in compensation levels and expected long-term return on plan assets would have had on our net periodic benefit cost for fiscal year 2019:2020:
| | | | | |
| Change in Net Periodic
Benefit Cost
in millions |
| Assumptions: | |
| Discount rate | $ | 6 | |
| Expected increase in compensation levels | $ | 2 | |
| Expected long-term return on plan assets | $ | 33 | |
|
| | | |
| | Change in Net Periodic Benefit Cost in millions |
| Assumptions: | |
|
| Discount rate | $ | 9 |
|
| Expected increase in compensation levels | $ | 2 |
|
| Expected long-term return on plan assets | $ | 28 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Taxes on Earnings
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) made significant changes to the U.S. tax law. The TCJA lowered our U.S. statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, while also imposing a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings.
In December 2017, the SEC staff issued SAB No. 118, which allows registrants to record provisional amounts during a one year “measurement period”. In January 2019, we completed our accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA with no material changes to the provisional amounts recorded during the measurement period.
In January 2018, the FASB released guidance on the accounting for tax on the Global Minimum Tax provisions of TCJA. The Global Minimum Tax provisions impose a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. We have elected to treat the Global Minimum Tax inclusions as period costs.
As a result of certain employment actions and capital investments we have undertaken, income from manufacturing activities in certain jurisdictions is subject to reduced tax rates and, in some cases, is wholly exempt from taxes for fiscal years through 2027.2029.
Material changes in our estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements in the various jurisdictions in which we do business could impact how future earnings are repatriated to the United States, and our related future effective tax rate. The effects of the TCJA related to these policies are referenced and discussed in detail in Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
We calculate our current and deferred tax provisions based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the final positions reflected in our income tax returns. We adjust our current and deferred tax provisions based on income tax returns which are generally filed in the third or fourth quarters of the subsequent fiscal year.
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences to reverse.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that we are more likely than not to realize. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, we consider future market growth, forecasted earnings, future taxable income, the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which we operate and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In the event we were to determine that it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all or part of our deferred tax assets in the future, we would increase the valuation allowance and recognize a corresponding charge to earnings or other comprehensive income in the period in which we make such a determination. Likewise, if we later determine that we are more likely than not to realize the deferred tax assets, we would reverse the applicable portion of the previously recognized valuation allowance. In order for us to realize our deferred tax assets, we must be able to generate sufficient taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the deferred tax assets are located.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and approximately 5860 other countries, and we are subject to routine corporate income tax audits in many of these jurisdictions. We believe that positions taken on our tax returns are fully supported, but tax authorities may challenge these positions, which may not be fully sustained on examination by the relevant tax authorities. Accordingly, our income tax provision includes amounts intended to satisfy assessments that may result from these challenges. Determining the income tax provision for these potential assessments and recording the related effects
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
requires management judgments and estimates. The amounts ultimately paid on resolution of an audit could be materially different from the amounts previously included in our income tax provision and, therefore, could have a material impact on our income tax provision, net income and cash flows. Our accrual for uncertain tax positions is attributable primarily to uncertainties concerning the tax treatment of our domestic operations, including the allocation of income among different jurisdictions, intercompany transactions, pension and related interest. For a further discussion on taxes on earnings, refer to Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Inventory
We state our inventory at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. We make adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value at the product group level for estimated excess or obsolescence. Factors influencing these adjustments include changes in demand, technological changes, product life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing, physical deterioration and quality issues.
Business Combinations
We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree generally based on their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of these assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests in the acquiree is recorded as goodwill and may involve engaging independent third-partiesthird parties to perform an appraisal. When determining the fair values of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree, management makes significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.
Critical estimates in valuing intangible assets include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, which includes consideration of future growth rates and margins, attrition rates, future changes in technology and brand awareness, loyalty and position, and discount rates. Fair value estimates are based on the assumptions management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Amounts recorded in a business combination may change during the measurement period, which is a period not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition, as additional information about conditions existing at the acquisition date becomes available.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Goodwill
We review goodwill for impairment annually during our fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. We can elect to perform aA qualitative assessment is first performed to test a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment or perform a quantitative impairment test. Based on a qualitative assessment,determine if we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be less than its carrying amount,amount. Judgment in the assessment of qualitative factors of impairment may include changes in business climate, market conditions, or other events impacting the reporting unit. If we determine an impairment is more likely than not based on our qualitative assessment, a quantitative assessment of impairment is performed.
Performing a quantitative goodwill impairment test will be performed.
Inincludes the quantitative impairment test, we compare the fair valuedetermination of each reporting unit to its carrying amount with the fair values derived most significantly from the income approach, and to a lesser extent, the market approach. Under the income approach, we estimate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. We base cash flow projections on management’sand involves significant estimates ofand assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include, among others, revenue growth rates and operating margins taking into consideration industryused to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions. We base the discount rate on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with business-specific characteristicsconditions, and the uncertainty related to the reporting unit’s ability to execute on the projected cash flows. Under thedetermination of appropriate market approach,comparables. If we estimate fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable publicly-traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit. We weight the fair value derived from the market approach depending on the level of comparability of these publicly-traded companies to the reporting unit. When market comparables are not meaningful or not available, we estimate the fair value of a reporting unit using only the income approach.
If the fair value of a reporting unit exceedsdetermine the carrying amount of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired. If theexceeds fair value, of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, goodwill is impaired and the excess of the reporting unit’s carrying value over the fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
Our annual goodwill impairment analysis, performed using the qualitative assessment option as of the first day of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, resulted in a conclusion that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values. As a result, we concluded that a quantitative impairment test was not necessary.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage a variety of risks, including risks related to foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and existing assets and liabilities. We use forwards, swaps and at times, options to hedge certain foreign currency, interest rate and, return on certain investments exposures. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative purposes. As of October 31, 2019, the gross notional value of our derivative portfolio was $24 billion. Assets and liabilities related to derivative instruments are measured at fair value and were $392 million and $166 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2019.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Fair value is the price we would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In the absence of active markets for the identical assets or liabilities, such measurements involve developing assumptions based on market observable data and, in the absence of such data, internal information that is consistent with what market participants would use in a hypothetical transaction that occurs at the measurement date. The determination of fair value often involves significant judgments about assumptions such as determining an appropriate discount rate that factors in both risk and liquidity premiums, identifying the similarities and differences in market transactions, weighting those differences accordingly and then making the appropriate adjustments to those market transactions to reflect the risks specific to the asset or liability being valued. We generally use industry standard valuation models to measure the fair value of our derivative positions. When prices in active markets are not available for the identical asset or liability, we use industry standard valuation models to measure fair value. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to present value using market-based observable inputs, including interest rate curves, HP and counterparty credit risk, foreign currency exchange rates, and forward and spot prices.
For a further discussion on fair value measurements and derivative instruments, refer to Note 9, “Fair Value” and Note 10, “Financial Instruments”, respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Loss Contingencies
We are involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings including those consisting of intellectual property (“IP”), commercial, securities, employment, employee benefits and environmental matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. We record a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine both the probability of having incurred a liability and the estimated amount of the liability. We review these matters at least quarterly and adjust these liabilities to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other updated information and events, pertaining to a particular case. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, we share responsibility with Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain matters, as discussed in Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise has agreed to indemnify us in whole or in part with respect to certain matters. Based on our experience, we believe that any damage amounts claimed in the specific litigation and contingencies matters further discussed in Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies”, are not a meaningful indicator of HP’s potential liability. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. However, we believe we have valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against us. Nevertheless, cash flows or results of operations could be materially affected in any particular period by the resolution of one or more of these contingencies. We believe we have recorded adequate provisions for any such matters and, as of October 31, 2019,2020, it was not reasonably possible that a material loss had been incurred in excess of the amounts recognized in our financial statements.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For a summary of recent accounting pronouncements applicable to our consolidated financial statements see Note 1, “Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenue from our international operations has historically represented, and we expect will continue to represent, a majority of our overall net revenue. As a result, our net revenue growth has been impacted, and we expect it will continue to be impacted, by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. In order to provide a framework for assessing performance excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, we supplement the year-over-year percentage change in net revenue with the year-over-year percentage change in net revenue on a constant currency basis, which excludes the effect of foreign currency exchange fluctuations calculated by translating current period revenues using monthly average exchange rates from the comparative period and hedging activities from the prior-year period and does not adjust for any repricing or demand impacts from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This information is provided so that net revenue can be viewed with and without the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which is consistent with how management evaluates our net revenue results and trends, as management does not believe that the excluded items are reflective of ongoing operating results. The constant currency measures are provided in addition to, and not as a substitute for, the year-over-year percentage change in net revenue on a GAAP basis. Other companies may calculate and define similarly labeled items differently, which may limit the usefulness of this measure for comparative purposes.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of operations in dollars and as a percentage of net revenue were as follows:
| | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Dollars | | % of Net Revenue | | Dollars | | % of Net Revenue | | Dollars | | % of Net Revenue | | Dollars | | % of Net Revenue | | Dollars | | % of Net Revenue | | Dollars | | % of Net Revenue |
| | Dollars in millions | | Dollars in millions |
| Net revenue | $ | 58,756 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 58,472 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 52,056 |
| | 100.0 | % | Net revenue | $ | 56,639 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 58,756 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 58,472 | | | 100.0 | % |
| Cost of revenue | 47,586 |
| | 81.0 | % | | 47,803 |
| | 81.8 | % | | 42,478 |
| | 81.6 | % | Cost of revenue | 46,202 | | | 81.6 | % | | 47,586 | | | 81.0 | % | | 47,803 | | | 81.8 | % |
| Gross profit | 11,170 |
| | 19.0 | % | | 10,669 |
| | 18.2 | % | | 9,578 |
| | 18.4 | % | Gross profit | 10,437 | | | 18.4 | % | | 11,170 | | | 19.0 | % | | 10,669 | | | 18.2 | % |
| Research and development | 1,499 |
| | 2.6 | % | | 1,404 |
| | 2.4 | % | | 1,190 |
| | 2.3 | % | Research and development | 1,478 | | | 2.6 | % | | 1,499 | | | 2.6 | % | | 1,404 | | | 2.4 | % |
| Selling, general and administrative | 5,368 |
| | 9.1 | % | | 5,099 |
| | 8.7 | % | | 4,532 |
| | 8.7 | % | Selling, general and administrative | 4,906 | | | 8.6 | % | | 5,368 | | | 9.1 | % | | 5,099 | | | 8.7 | % |
| Restructuring and other charges | 275 |
| | 0.4 | % | | 132 |
| | 0.2 | % | | 362 |
| | 0.7 | % | Restructuring and other charges | 462 | | | 0.9 | % | | 275 | | | 0.4 | % | | 132 | | | 0.2 | % |
| Acquisition-related charges | 35 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 123 |
| | 0.2 | % | | 125 |
| | 0.2 | % | Acquisition-related charges | 16 | | | — | % | | 35 | | | 0.1 | % | | 123 | | | 0.2 | % |
| Amortization of intangible assets | 116 |
| | 0.2 | % | | 80 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 1 |
| | — | % | Amortization of intangible assets | 113 | | | 0.2 | % | | 116 | | | 0.2 | % | | 80 | | | 0.1 | % |
| Earnings from operations | 3,877 |
| | 6.6 | % | | 3,831 |
| | 6.6 | % | | 3,368 |
| | 6.5 | % | Earnings from operations | 3,462 | | | 6.1 | % | | 3,877 | | | 6.6 | % | | 3,831 | | | 6.6 | % |
| Interest and other, net | (1,354 | ) | | (2.3 | )% | | (818 | ) | | (1.4 | )% | | (92 | ) | | (0.2 | )% | Interest and other, net | (231) | | | (0.4) | % | | (1,354) | | | (2.3) | % | | (818) | | | (1.4) | % |
| Earnings before taxes | 2,523 |
| | 4.3 | % | | 3,013 |
| | 5.2 | % | | 3,276 |
| | 6.3 | % | Earnings before taxes | 3,231 | | | 5.7 | % | | 2,523 | | | 4.3 | % | | 3,013 | | | 5.2 | % |
| Benefit from (provision for) taxes | 629 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 2,314 |
| | 3.9 | % | | (750 | ) | | (1.4 | )% | |
| (Provision for) benefit from taxes | | (Provision for) benefit from taxes | (387) | | | (0.7) | % | | 629 | | | 1.1 | % | | 2,314 | | | 3.9 | % |
| Net earnings | $ | 3,152 |
| | 5.4 | % | | $ | 5,327 |
| | 9.1 | % | | $ | 2,526 |
| | 4.9 | % | Net earnings | $ | 2,844 | | | 5.0 | % | | $ | 3,152 | | | 5.4 | % | | $ | 5,327 | | | 9.1 | % |
Net Revenue
In fiscal year 2020, total net revenue decreased 3.6% (decreased 2.3% on a constant currency basis) as compared to the prior-year period. Net revenue from the United States decreased 1.8% to $20.2 billion and net revenue from outside of the United States decreased 4.6% to $36.4 billion. The decrease in net revenue was primarily driven by decline in Desktops, Supplies, Commercial Printing Hardware and unfavorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset by growth in Notebooks. The decline is driven by demand weakness as businesses remained closed and office workers continued to work from home, partially offset by strong demand in Notebooks.
In fiscal year 2019, total net revenue increased 0.5% (increased 2.0% on a constant currency basis) as compared to the prior-year period. Net revenue from the United States remained flat at $20.6 billion and net revenue from outside of the United States increased 0.7% to $38.2 billion. The increase in net revenue was primarily driven by growth in Notebooks, Desktops and Workstations in Personal Systems, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts and a decline in Printing Supplies.
In fiscal year 2018, total net revenue increased 12.3% (increased 10.1% on a constant currency basis) as compared to the prior-year period. Net revenue from the United States increased 6.6% to $20.6 billion and net revenue from outside of the United States increased 15.7% to $37.9 billion. The increase in net revenue was primarily driven by growth in Notebooks, Desktops, Supplies, Commercial Printing Hardware revenue and favorable foreign currency impacts.
A detailed discussion of the factors contributing to the changes in segment net revenue is included under “Segment Information” below.
Gross Margin
Our gross margin was 18.4% for fiscal year 2020 compared with 19.0% for fiscal year 2019. The decrease was primarily due to unfavorable segment mix and lower rate in Printing hardware partially offset by higher rate in Personal Systems driven by favorable commodity costs.
Our gross margin was 19.0% for fiscal year 2019 compared with 18.2% for fiscal year 2018. The increase was primarily due to higher rate in Personal Systems driven by lower supply chain costs.
Our gross margin was 18.2% for fiscal year 2018 compared with 18.4% for fiscal year 2017. The decrease was primarily due to higher Commercial Hardware unit placements in Printing and an increase in commodity and logistics costs in Personal Systems, partially offset by higher pricing in Personal Systems and favorable foreign currency impacts.
A detailed discussion of the factors contributing to the changes in segment gross margins is included under “Segment Information” below.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development (“R&D”)
R&D expense decreased 1.4% in fiscal year 2020 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to expense management partially offset by continuing investments in innovation and key growth initiatives.
R&D expense increased 7%6.7% in fiscal year 2019 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to continuing investments in innovation and key growth initiatives.
R&D expense increased 18% in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to continuing investment in Printing, including the acquisition
Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)
SG&A expense decreased 8.6% in fiscal year 2020 as compared to the prior-year period, driven by structural cost savings from the transformation program and the benefits of temporary discretionary cost actions.
SG&A expense increased 5%5.3% in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily driven by increased investments in key growth initiatives and go-to-market in Personal Systems and investment in digital infrastructure.
SG&A expenseRestructuring and other Charges
Restructuring and other charges increased 13%by $187 million in fiscal year 2018 as2020 compared to the prior-year period, primarily driven by incremental go-to-market investmentsdue to support revenue growth, includingcharges from the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business.
Restructuring and other ChargesFiscal 2020 Plan.
Restructuring and other charges increased by $143 million in fiscal year 2019 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to charges from the Fiscal 2020 Plan and the restructuring plan approved in October 2016 (the “Fiscal 2017 Plan”), which was later amended in May 2018.
Restructuring and other charges decreased by $230 million in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to lower charges from the Fiscal 2017 Plan.
Acquisition-related Charges
Acquisition-related charges for the fiscal years 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 relate primarily to third-party professional and legal fees, and integration-related costs, as well as fair value adjustments of certain acquired assets such as inventory.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets for the fiscal year ended 2020 relates primarily to intangible assets resulting from prior acquisitions.
Amortization expense increased by $36 million in fiscal year 2019 compared to the prior-year period, due to intangible assets resulting primarily from the acquisition of the Apogee group.
Amortization expense increased by $79 million in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior-year period, due to intangible assets resulting primarily from the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business.
Interest and Other, Net
Interest and other, net expense decreased by $1.1 billion in fiscal year 2020 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to reversal of indemnification receivables from Hewlett Packard Enterprise pertaining to various audit settlements in the prior- year period.
Interest and other, net expense increased by $536 million$0.5 billion in fiscal year 2019 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to tax indemnifications related to the termination of the tax matters agreement (“TMA”) with Hewlett Packard Enterprise during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019.
Interest and other, net expense increased by $726 million in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to the reversal of indemnification receivables from Hewlett Packard Enterprise pertaining to various income tax audit settlements, and loss on extinguishment of debt.
(Provision for) Benefit from (Provision for) Taxes
Our effective tax rates were (24.9%)12.0%, (76.8%(24.9%) and 22.9%(76.8%) in fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. In fiscal year 2020, our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to the resolution of various audits and 2017, respectively.favorable tax rates associated with certain earnings in lower-tax jurisdictions throughout the world. In fiscal year 2019, our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to the resolution of various audits, changes in valuation allowances, and impacts of U.S. tax reform. In fiscal year 2018, our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 23.3% primarily due to transitional impacts of U.S. tax reform and resolution of various audits and tax litigation. In fiscal year 2017, our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to favorable tax rates associated with certain earnings in lower-tax jurisdictions throughout the world. The jurisdictions with favorable tax rates that had the most significant impact on our effective tax rate in the periods presented were Puerto Rico, Singapore, China Malaysia and Ireland. Additionally, the overall effective tax rate in fiscal year 2017 was impacted by adjustments to valuation allowances and state income taxes.Malaysia.
For a reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21%, 23.3% and 35% in fiscal years 2020 and 2019 2018 and 2017, respectively,23.3% in fiscal year 2018, and further explanation of our provision for income taxes, see Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
In fiscal year 2020, we recorded $244 million of net income tax benefit related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. This amount includes tax benefits related to audit settlements of $124 million in various jurisdictions and $82 million related to restructuring benefits. Additionally, we recorded benefits of $20 million related to proxy contest costs and $17 million of other net tax benefits. In fiscal year 2020, excess tax benefits associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units were immaterial.
In fiscal year 2019, we recorded $1.3 billion of net income tax benefit related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. This amount includes tax benefits related to audit settlements of $1.0 billion, $75 million due to ability to utilize tax attributes, $57 million of restructuring benefits and net valuation allowance releases of $94 million. We also recorded benefits of $78 million related to U.S. tax reform as a result of new guidance issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). These benefits were partially offset by uncertain tax position charges of $51 million. In fiscal year 2019, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, we recorded excess tax benefits of $20 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
In fiscal year 2018, we recorded $2.8 billion of net income tax benefit related to discrete items in the provision for taxes which include impacts of the TCJA.Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”). As discussed in the Note 6 “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report, we had not yet completed our analysis of the full impact of the TCJA. However, as of October 31, 2018, we recorded a provisional tax benefit of $760 million related to $5.6 billion net benefit for the decrease in our deferred tax liability on unremitted foreign earnings, partially offset by $3.3 billion net expense for the deemed repatriation tax payable in installments over eight years, a $1.2 billion net expense for the remeasurement of our deferred assets and liabilities to the new U.S. statutory tax rate and a $317 million net expense related to realization on U.S. deferred taxes that are expected to be
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
realized at a lower rate. Fiscal year 2018 also included tax benefits related to audit settlements of $1.5 billion and valuation allowance releases of $601 million pertaining to a change in our ability to utilize certain foreign and U.S. deferred tax assets due to a change in our geographic earnings mix. These benefits were partially offset by other net tax charges of $34 million. In fiscal year 2018, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, we recorded excess tax benefits of $42 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units.
In fiscal year 2017, we recorded $72 million of net income tax benefit related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. These amounts primarily include tax benefits of $84 million related to restructuring and other charges, $12 million related to U.S. federal provision to return adjustments, $45 million related to Samsung acquisition-related charges, and $13 million of other net tax benefits. In addition, we recorded tax charges of $11 million related to changes in state valuation allowances, $22 million of state provision to return adjustments, and $49 million related to uncertain tax positions.
Segment Information
A description of the products and services for each segment can be found in Note 2, “Segment Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. Future changes to this organizational structure may result in changes to the segments disclosed.
Realignment
Effective at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2019, we implemented an organizational change to align our business unit financial reporting more closely with our current business structure. The organizational change resulted in the transfer of certain Samsung-branded product categories from Commercial to Consumer within the Printing segment. We reflected this change to our business unit information in prior reporting periods on an as-if basis. The reporting change had no impact to previously reported segment net revenue, consolidated net revenue, earnings from operations, net earnings or net earnings per share (“EPS”).
Personal Systems
| | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Dollars in millions | | Dollars in millions |
| Net revenue | $ | 38,694 |
| | $ | 37,661 |
| | $ | 33,321 |
| Net revenue | $ | 38,997 | | | $ | 38,694 | | $ | 37,661 |
| Earnings from operations | $ | 1,898 |
| | $ | 1,402 |
| | $ | 1,206 |
| Earnings from operations | $ | 2,312 | | $ | 1,898 | | $ | 1,402 |
| Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue | 4.9 | % | | 3.7 | % | | 3.6 | % | Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue | 5.9% | | 4.9 | % | | 3.7% |
The components of net revenue and the weighted net revenue change by business unit were as follows:
| | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | | | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | Net Revenue | | Weighted Net Revenue Change
Percentage Points (1) | | Net Revenue | | Weighted Net Revenue Change Percentage Points(1) |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions | | | | | | In millions | | | | |
| Notebooks | $ | 22,928 |
| | $ | 22,547 |
| | $ | 19,782 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 8.3 |
| Notebooks | $ | 25,766 | | | $ | 22,928 | | | $ | 22,547 | | | 7.3 | | | 1.0 | |
| Desktops | 12,046 |
| | 11,567 |
| | 10,298 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 3.8 |
| Desktops | 9,806 | | | 12,046 | | | 11,567 | | | (5.8) | | | 1.3 | |
| Workstations | 2,389 |
| | 2,246 |
| | 2,042 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.6 |
| Workstations | 1,816 | | | 2,389 | | | 2,246 | | | (1.5) | | | 0.4 | |
| Other | 1,331 |
| | 1,301 |
| | 1,199 |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
| Other | 1,609 | | | 1,331 | | | 1,301 | | | 0.8 | | | — | |
| Total Personal Systems | $ | 38,694 |
| | $ | 37,661 |
| | $ | 33,321 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 13.0 |
| Total Personal Systems | $ | 38,997 | | | $ | 38,694 | | | $ | 37,661 | | | 0.8 | | | 2.7 | |
(1) Weighted Net Revenue Change Percentage Points measures contribution of each business unit towards overall segment revenue growth. It is calculated by dividing the change in revenue of each business unit from the prior-year period by total segment revenue for the prior-year period.
Fiscal Year 2020 compared with Fiscal Year 2019
Personal Systems net revenue increased 0.8% (increased 2.3% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal year 2020 as compared to the prior-year period. The net revenue increase was primarily due to growth in Notebooks, partially offset by Desktops and Workstations, and unfavorable foreign currency impacts. The net revenue increase was driven by a 4.8% increase in unit volume partially offset by 3.8% decrease in average selling prices (“ASPs”) as compared to the prior-year period. The increase in unit volume was primarily due to growth in Notebooks resulting from strong demand driven by work from home, distance learning and gaming, partially offset by Desktops and Workstations. The decrease in ASPs was primarily due to mix shifts to consumer and education, and unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Consumer revenue increased 12.8% as compared to prior-year period, driven by unit growth in Notebooks, and higher ASPs. Commercial revenue decreased 4.8% as compared to the prior-year period, primarily driven by lower ASPs and unit declines in Desktops and Workstations, partially offset by unit growth in Notebooks.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Net revenue increased 12.4% in Notebooks and decreased 18.6% in Desktops and 24.0% in Workstations in fiscal year 2020 as compared to the prior-year period.
Personal Systems earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased by 1.0 percentage points in fiscal year 2020 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to in an increase in gross margin, and decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of revenue. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to favorable commodity costs partially offset by mix shifts. The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to reduction in marketing spend and our ongoing structural cost savings plan.
Fiscal Year 2019 compared with Fiscal Year 2018
Personal Systems net revenue increased 2.7% (increased 4.9% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period. The net revenue increase was primarily due to growth in Notebooks, Desktops and Workstations, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts. The net revenue increase was driven by a 2.2% increase in unit volume and 0.5% increase in average selling prices (“ASPs”) as compared to the prior-year period. The increase in unit volume was primarily due to growth in Notebooks and Desktops. The increase in ASPs was primarily due to positive mix shifts and higher pricing, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Commercial revenue increased 7.0% primarily
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
driven by higher unit volume partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts, and consumer revenue decreased by 5.5% primarily driven by lower unit volume, respectively, in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period.
Net revenue increased 1.7% in Notebooks, 4.1% in Desktops and 6.4% in Workstations in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period.
Personal Systems earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased by 1.2 percentage points in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to in an increase in gross margin, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to lower supply chain costs and higher ASPs. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to increased investments in key growth initiatives and go-to-market.
Fiscal Year 2018 compared with Fiscal Year 2017
Personal Systems net revenue increased 13.0% (increased 10.5% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period. The net revenue increase was primarily due to growth in Notebooks and Desktops and favorable foreign currency impacts. The net revenue increase was driven by a 6.6% increase in unit volume and 6.0% increase in ASPs as compared to the prior-year period. The increase in unit volume was primarily due to growth in Notebooks and Desktops. The increase in ASPs was primarily due to higher pricing driven by increased commodity and logistics costs, favorable foreign currency impacts and positive mix shifts. Consumer and Commercial revenue increased 11% and 14%, respectively, in fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period, driven by growth in Notebooks, Desktops and Workstations as a result of higher unit volume combined with higher ASPs.
Net revenue increased 14% in Notebooks, 12% in Desktops and 10% in Workstations in fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period.
Personal Systems earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased by 0.1 percentage points in fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period. The increase was primarily due to higher ASPs, partially offset by an increase in commodity and logistics costs.
Printing
| | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Dollars in millions | | Dollars in millions |
| Net revenue | $ | 20,066 |
| | $ | 20,805 |
| | $ | 18,728 |
| Net revenue | $ | 17,641 | | $ | 20,066 | | $ | 20,805 |
| Earnings from operations | $ | 3,202 |
| | $ | 3,314 |
| | $ | 3,142 |
| Earnings from operations | $ | 2,495 | | $ | 3,202 | | $ | 3,314 |
| Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue | 16.0 | % | | 15.9 | % | | 16.8 | % | Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue | 14.1% | | 16.0% | | 15.9% |
The components of the net revenue and weighted net revenue change by business unit were as follows:
| | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | | | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | Net Revenue | | Weighted Net Revenue Change Percentage Points(1) | | Net Revenue | | Weighted Net Revenue Change Percentage Points(1) |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions | | | | | | In millions | | | | |
| Supplies | $ | 12,921 |
| | $ | 13,575 |
| | $ | 12,524 |
| | (3.2 | ) | | 5.6 |
| Supplies | $ | 11,586 | | | $ | 12,921 | | | $ | 13,575 | | | (6.7) | | | (3.2) | |
| Commercial Hardware | 4,612 |
| | 4,514 |
| | 3,792 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 3.9 |
| Commercial Hardware | 3,539 | | | 4,612 | | | 4,514 | | | (5.3) | | | 0.5 | |
| Consumer Hardware | 2,533 |
| | 2,716 |
| | 2,412 |
| | (0.9 | ) | | 1.6 |
| Consumer Hardware | 2,516 | | | 2,533 | | | 2,716 | | | (0.1) | | | (0.9) | |
| Total Printing | $ | 20,066 |
| | $ | 20,805 |
| | $ | 18,728 |
| | (3.6 | ) | | 11.1 |
| Total Printing | $ | 17,641 | | | $ | 20,066 | | | $ | 20,805 | | | (12.1) | | | (3.6) | |
(1) Weighted Net Revenue Change Percentage Points measures the contribution of each business unit towards overall segment revenue growth. It is calculated by dividing the change in revenue of each business unit from the prior period by total segment revenue for the prior-year period.
Fiscal Year 2020 compared with Fiscal Year 2019
Printing net revenue decreased 12.1% (decreased 11.2% on a constant currency basis) for fiscal year 2020 as compared to the prior-year period. The decline in net revenue was primarily driven by a decline in Supplies, Commercial Hardware and unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Net revenue for Supplies decreased 10.3% as compared to the prior-year period, primarily driven by demand weakness as businesses operated with reduced onsite capacity and a majority of office workers continue to work from home. ASPs decreased 15.9% and printer unit volume decreased 5.1% as compared to the prior-year
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
period. Printer ASPs decreased primarily due to mix shifts and unfavorable foreign currency impact. The decrease in printer unit volume was driven by unit decreases in both Commercial and Consumer Hardware.
Net revenue for Commercial Hardware decreased 23.3% as compared to the prior-year period, due to a 19.4% decrease in printer volume and a 19.6% decrease in ASPs. The printer unit volume decline was due to lower demand as businesses operated with reduced onsite capacity due to COVID-19. The decrease in ASPs was driven by mix shifts, competitive pricing and unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
Net revenue for Consumer Hardware decreased 0.7% as compared to the prior-year period, due to a decrease in printer unit volume by 2.7% partially offset by 2.0% increase in ASPs. The printer unit volume decrease was driven by supply chain disruptions due to COVID-19. The increase in ASPs was primarily due to disciplined pricing, partially offset by mix shifts and unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
Printing earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue decreased by 1.9 percentage points for the fiscal year 2020 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to lower net revenue in Commercial Hardware, higher Consumer mix, supply chain disruptions partially offset by disciplined pricing and improved Supplies mix.
Fiscal Year 2019 compared with Fiscal Year 2018
Printing net revenue decreased 3.6% (decreased 3.0% on a constant currency basis) for fiscal year 2019 as compared to prior-year period. The decline in net revenue was primarily driven by a decline in Supplies, Consumer Hardware revenue and unfavorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset by an increase in Commercial Hardware revenue. Net revenue for Supplies decreased 4.8% as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to demand weakness. Printer unit volume
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
decreased 4.8% compared to the prior-year period. The decrease in printer unit volume was driven by unit decrease in Consumer Hardware.
Net revenue for Commercial Hardware increased 2.2% as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to the acquisition of the Apogee group.
Net revenue for Consumer Hardware decreased 6.7% as compared to the prior-year period due to a 5.4% decrease in printer unit volume and 1.7% decrease in ASPs. The unit volume decrease was driven by InkJet Home Consumer business and LaserJet Home business. The decrease in ASPs was primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
Printing earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased by 0.1 percentage points for the fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to higher gross margin. The gross margin increased primarily due to rate improvement in Commercial Hardware partially offset by lower Supplies revenue.
Fiscal Year 2018 compared with Fiscal Year 2017
Printing net revenue increased 11.1% (increased 9.5% on a constant currency basis) for fiscal year 2018 as compared to prior-year period. The increase in net revenue was primarily driven by the increase in Supplies and Hardware revenue and favorable foreign currency impacts. Net revenue for Supplies increased 8.4% as compared to the prior-year period, including the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business. Printer unit volume increased 12.7% while ASPs increased 1.7% as compared to the prior-year period. The increase in Printer unit volume was primarily driven by unit increases in Commercial and Consumer Hardware, including the Samsung-branded printers. Printer ASPs increased primarily due to favorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset by the dilution impact from Samsung-branded low-end A4 products.
Net revenue for Commercial Hardware increased 19.0% as compared to the prior-year period, including revenue from Samsung-branded printers, LaserJet and PageWide printers. The unit volume increased by 39.6% while the ASPs decreased by 17.0%. The unit volume increased primarily due to Samsung-branded printers. The decrease in ASPs was primarily due to the dilution impact from Samsung-branded low-end A4 products.
Net revenue for Consumer Hardware increased 12.6% as compared to the prior-year period due to a 9.3% increase in printer unit volume and a 3.4% increase in ASPs. The unit volume increase was driven by Samsung-branded printers, InkJet and LaserJet Home business. The increase in ASPs was primarily due to favorable foreign currency impacts.
Printing earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue decreased by 0.9 percentage points for the fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to an increase in operating expenses and lower gross margin. The gross margin decreased primarily due to lower Supplies mix and the dilution impact of Samsung-branded low-end products, partially offset by favorable foreign currency impacts and operational improvements. Operating expenses increased primarily driven by the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business and increases in investments in key growth initiatives and go-to-market.
Corporate Investments
The loss from operations in Corporate Investments for the fiscal years 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 was primarily due to expenses associated with HP Labs and our incubation and investment projects.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We use cash generated by operations as our primary source of liquidity. While the impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic are currently expected to be temporary, there is uncertainty around its extent and duration and our liquidity and working capital needs may be impacted in the future periods. We believe that internally generatedcurrent cash, flows are generallycash flow from operating activities, new borrowings, available commercial paper authorization and the credit facilities will be sufficient to support ourmeet HP’s operating businesses,cash requirements, planned capital expenditures, interest and principal payments on all borrowings, pension and post-retirement funding requirements, authorized share repurchases and annual dividend payments for the foreseeable future. Additionally, in the event that suitable businesses are available for acquisition that offer good return opportunities, the Company may obtain all or a portion of the financing for these acquisitions restructuring activities, maturing debt, income tax payments and the payment of stockholder dividends, in addition to investments and share repurchases. We are able to supplement this short-term liquidity, if necessary, with broad access to capital markets and credit facilities made available by various domestic and foreign financial institutions.through additional borrowings. While our access to capital markets may be constrained and our cost of borrowing may increase under certain business, market and economic conditions, our access to a variety of funding sources to meet our liquidity needs is designed to facilitate continued access to capital resources under all such conditions. Our liquidity is subject to various risks including the risks identified in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and market risks identified in the section entitled “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Item 7A, which are incorporated herein by reference.
On February 22, 2020, HP’s Board of Directors increased HP’s share repurchase authorization to $15.0 billion.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our cash and cash equivalents balances are held in numerous locations throughout the world, with the majority of those amounts held outside of the United States.world. We utilize a variety of planning and financing strategies in an effort to ensure that our worldwide cash is available when and where it is needed. Our cash position remains strong, and we expect that our cash balances, anticipated cash flow generated from operations and access to capital markets will be sufficient to cover our expected near-term cash outlays.
Amounts held outside of the United States are generally utilized to support non-U.S. liquidity needs and may from time to time be distributed to the United States. The TCJA made significant changes to the U.S. tax law, including a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings. The payments associated with this one-time transition tax will be paid over eight years and began in fiscal year 2019. We expect a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
will no longer be subject to U.S. income tax consequences upon a subsequent repatriation to the United States as a result of the transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings. However, a portion of this cash may still be subject to foreign income tax or withholding tax consequences upon repatriation. As we evaluate the future cash needs of our operations, we may revise the amount of foreign earnings considered to be permanently reinvested in our foreign subsidiaries and how to utilize such funds, including reducing our gross debt level, or other uses.
Liquidity
Our cash and cash equivalents, marketable debt securities and total debt were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In billions |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4.9 | | | $ | 4.5 | | | $ | 5.2 | |
Marketable debt securities(1) | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.7 | |
| Total debt | $ | 6.2 | | | $ | 5.1 | | | $ | 6.0 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In billions |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4.5 |
| | $ | 5.2 |
| | $ | 7.0 |
|
Marketable debt securities(1) | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
|
| Total debt | $ | 5.1 |
| | $ | 6.0 |
| | $ | 7.8 |
|
| |
(1)(1)Includes highly liquid U.S. treasury notes, U.S. agency securities, non-U.S. government bonds, corporate debt securities, money market and other funds. We classify these investments within Other current assets in Consolidated Balance Sheets, including those with maturity dates beyond one year, based on their highly liquid nature and availability for use in current operations.
| Includes highly liquid U.S. treasury notes, U.S. agency securities, non-U.S. government bonds, corporate debt securities, money market and other funds. We classify these investments within Other current assets in Consolidated Balance Sheets, including those with maturity dates beyond one year, based on their highly liquid nature and availability for use in current operations. |
Our key cash flow metrics were as follows:
| | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | In millions | | | | In millions |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 4,654 |
| | $ | 4,528 |
| | $ | 3,677 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 4,316 | | | $ | 4,654 | | | $ | 4,528 | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (438 | ) | | (716 | ) | | (1,717 | ) | Net cash used in investing activities | (1,016) | | | (438) | | | (716) | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (4,845 | ) | | (5,643 | ) | | (1,251 | ) | Net cash used in financing activities | (2,973) | | | (4,845) | | | (5,643) | |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (629 | ) | | $ | (1,831 | ) | | $ | 709 |
| |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 327 | | | $ | (629) | | | $ | (1,831) | |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $0.3 billion for fiscal year 2020 as compared to fiscal year 2019, primarily due to lower cash generated from working capital activities as a result of changes in demand dynamics due to COVID-19 and lower earnings from operation.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased marginally by $0.1 billion for fiscal year 2019 as compared to fiscal year 2018.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $0.9 billion for fiscal year 2018 as compared to fiscal year 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings from operations and cash generated from working capital management activities.
Working Capital Metrics
Management utilizes current cash conversion cycle information to manage our working capital level. The table below presents the cash conversion cycle:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of October 31 |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable (“DSO”) | 32 | | | 35 | | | 30 | |
| Days of supply in inventory (“DOS”) | 43 | | | 41 | | | 43 | |
| Days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable (“DPO”) | (105) | | | (107) | | | (105) | |
| Cash conversion cycle | (30) | | | (31) | | | (32) | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| Days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable (“DSO”) | 35 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 29 |
|
| Days of supply in inventory (“DOS”) | 41 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 46 |
|
| Days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable (“DPO”) | (107 | ) |
| (105 | ) |
| (105 | ) |
| Cash conversion cycle | (31 | ) |
| (32 | ) |
| (30 | ) |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The cash conversion cycle is the sum of days of DSO and DOS less DPO. Items which may cause the cash conversion cycle in a particular period to differ from a long-term sustainable rate include, but are not limited to, changes in business mix, changes in payment terms, extent of receivables factoring, seasonal trends and the timing of revenue recognition and inventory purchases within the period.
DSO measures the average number of days our receivables are outstanding. DSO is calculated by dividing ending accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, by a 90-day average of net revenue. For fiscal yearsyear 2020, the decrease in DSO as compared to fiscal year 2019, and
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussionwas due to favorable revenue linearity and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
2018,strong collections. For fiscal year 2019, the increase in DSO as compared to fiscal yearsyear 2018, and 2017, respectively, was primarily due to unfavorable revenue linearity.
DOS measures the average number of days from procurement to sale of our product. DOS is calculated by dividing ending inventory by a 90-day average of cost of goods sold. For fiscal year 2020, the increase in DOS as compared to fiscal year 2019 was primarily due to leveraging our balance sheet, particularly through higher strategic buys. For fiscal year 2019, the decrease in DOS compared to fiscal year 2018 was primarily due to reduction in inventory driven by reclassification of certain balances to other current assets pursuant to adoption of the new revenue standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. For fiscal year 2018, the DOS was lower primarily due to a focus on inventory management.
DPO measures the average number of days our accounts payable balances are outstanding. DPO is calculated by dividing ending accounts payable by a 90-day average of cost of goods sold. For fiscal year 2020, the decrease in DPO compared to fiscal year 2019 was primarily due to decrease in accounts payables driven by lower operating expenses. For fiscal year 2019, the increase in DPO compared to fiscal year 2018 was higher primarily due to working capital management activities, partially offset by lower inventory purchasing volume. For
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $0.6 billion for fiscal year 2018, the DPO remained flat2020 as compared to fiscal year 2017.
Investing Activities2019, primarily due to increase in investment classified as available-for-sale within Other current assets of $1.0 billion partially offset by lower net payments for acquisitions of $0.5 billion.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $0.3 billion for fiscal year 2019 as compared to fiscal year 2018, primarily due to lower net payments for acquisitions.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in investingfinancing activities decreased by $1.0$1.9 billion forin fiscal year 2018 as2020 compared to fiscal year 2017,2019, primarily due to a decrease in investments classified as available-for-sale investments within Other current assets by $1.6 billion, and collateral related to our derivativesissuance of $0.4senior notes of $3.0 billion partially offset by thehigher share repurchase of $0.7 billion and higher debt payment of $1.0 billion for the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business.
Financing Activities$0.3 billion.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $0.8 billion in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018, primarily due to lower payment of debt of $1.5 billion, partially offset by a decrease in outstanding commercial paper amounts of $0.7 billion.
Net cash used in financing activities increased by $4.4 billion in fiscal year 2018 compared to fiscal year 2017, primarily due to the payment to repurchase approximately $1.85 billion of debt, higher share repurchase amount of $1.1 billion and higher outstanding commercial paper of $0.9 billion in fiscal year 2017.
Capital Resources
Debt Levels
| | | | As of October 31 | | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Dollars in millions | | Dollars in millions |
| Short-term debt | $ | 357 |
| | $ | 1,463 |
| | $ | 1,072 |
| Short-term debt | $ | 674 | | $ | 357 | | $ | 1,463 |
| Long-term debt | $ | 4,780 |
| | $ | 4,524 |
| | $ | 6,747 |
| Long-term debt | $ | 5,543 | | $ | 4,780 | | $ | 4,524 |
| Debt-to-equity ratio | (4.3)x |
| | (9.4)x |
| | (2.3)x |
| Debt-to-equity ratio | (2.8)x | | (4.3)x | | (9.4)x |
| Weighted-average interest rate | 4.6 | % | | 4.3 | % | | 4.0 | % | Weighted-average interest rate | 3.9 | % | | 4.6 | % | | 4.3 | % |
We maintain debt levels that we establish through consideration of a number of factors, including cash flow expectations, cash requirements for operations, investment plans (including acquisitions), share repurchase activities, our cost of capital and targeted capital structure.leverage ratio.
Short-term debt increased by $0.3 billion and long-term debt increased by $0.8 billion for fiscal year 2020 as compared to fiscal year 2019. The net increase in total debt was primarily due to issuance of unsecured senior debt in June 2020 in principal amount of $3.0 billion, partially offset by the payment of $1.6 billion for the cash tender offer (“Tender Offer”) and the redemption of existing notes maturing in 2020 and 2021.
Short-term debt decreased by $1.1 billion for fiscal year 2019 as compared to fiscal year 2018 primarily due to a decrease in outstanding commercial paper amounts of $0.9 billion.
Long-term debt decreased by $2.2 billion for fiscal year 2018 as compared to fiscal year 2017 primarily due to the payment to repurchase approximately $1.85 billion in aggregate principal amount
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our debt-to-equity ratio is calculated as the carrying amount of debt divided by total stockholders’ deficit. Our debt-to-equity ratio changed by 1.5x in fiscal year 2020 compared to fiscal year 2019, primarily due to an increase in stockholders’ deficit balance of $1.0 billion.
Our debt-to-equity ratio changed by 5.1x in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018, primarily due to an increase in stockholders’ deficit balance of $0.6 billion.
Our debt-to-equity ratio changed by 7.1x in fiscal year 2018 compared to fiscal year 2017, primarily due to a decrease in stockholders’ deficit balance of $2.8 billion.
Our weighted-average interest rate reflects the effective interest rate on our borrowings prevailing during the period and reflects the effect of interest rate swaps. For more information on our interest rate swaps, see Note 10, “Financial Instruments” in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Available Borrowing Resources
We had the following resources available to obtain short or long-term financing:
|
| | | |
| | As of October 31, 2019 |
| | In millions |
| 2016 Shelf Registration Statement | Unspecified |
|
| Uncommitted lines of credit | $ | 724 |
|
The 2016 Shelf Registration Statement will expire in December 2019, around which time we expect to file a new shelf registration statement.
As of October 31, 2019,2020, we maintain a senior unsecured committed revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of $4.0 billion, thatwhich will be available until March 30, 2023 and is primarily to support the issuance of commercial paper.On May 29, 2020, we entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility providing for a senior unsecured revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of $1.0 billion, which will be available until May 28, 2021. Funds borrowed under thisthese revolving credit facilityfacilities may also be used for general corporate purposes.
On June 17, 2020, we issued $3.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes across various maturities. We used approximately $0.7 billion and $0.9 billion of the proceeds from such issuance to fund the Tender Offer and the redemption, respectively, of existing notes maturing in 2020 and 2021. For more information on the new notes and the repurchase and redemption of existing notes, see Note 11, “Borrowings”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Available Borrowing Resources
As of October 31, 2020, we had available borrowing resources of $725 million from uncommitted lines of credit in addition to the senior unsecured committed revolving credit facilities.
In December 2020, we filed a post-effective amendment to the 2019 Shelf Registration Statement to include certain information that is required to be included by registrants who are not well-known seasoned issuers (as such term is defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) because we will no longer be a well-known seasoned issuer upon the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Following the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we intend to file another post-effective amendment to convert the registration statement to the proper submission type for a non-automatic shelf registration statement. Pending effectiveness of the second post-effective amendment, we can continue to use the 2019 Shelf Registration Statement. Once it is declared effective, the further amended registration statement will enable us to offer for sale, from time to time, in one or more offerings, $5.0 billion, in the aggregate, of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, depository shares and warrants.
For more information on our borrowings, see Note 11, “Borrowings”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Credit Ratings
Our credit risk is evaluated by major independent rating agencies based upon publicly available information as well as information obtained in our ongoing discussions with them. While we do not have any rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity of a material amount of our debt, previous downgrades have increased the cost of borrowing under our credit facility, have reduced market capacity for our commercial paper and have required the posting of additional collateral under some of our derivative contracts. In addition, any further downgrade to our credit ratings by any rating agencies may further impact us in a similar manner, and, depending on the extent of any such downgrade, could have a negative impact on our liquidity and capital position. We can access alternative sources of funding, including drawdowns under our credit facility, if necessary, to offset potential reductions in the market capacity for our commercial paper.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
CONTRACTUAL AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS
Our contractual and other obligations as of October 31, 2019,2020, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Payments Due by Period |
| | Total | | 1 Year or
Less | | 1-3 Years | | 3-5 Years | | More than 5 Years |
| | In millions |
Principal payments on debt(1) | $ | 6,225 | | | $ | 659 | | | $ | 1,313 | | | $ | 1,202 | | | $ | 3,051 | |
Interest payments on debt(2) | 2,240 | | | 244 | | | 360 | | | 309 | | | 1,327 | |
Purchase obligations(3) | 499 | | | 290 | | | 163 | | | 40 | | | 6 | |
| Operating lease obligations | 1,279 | | | 303 | | | 438 | | | 241 | | | 297 | |
| Finance lease obligations | 40 | | | 22 | | | 14 | | | 4 | | | — | |
Total(4)(5)(6) | $ | 10,283 | | | $ | 1,518 | | | $ | 2,288 | | | $ | 1,796 | | | $ | 4,681 | |
(1)Amounts represent the principal cash payments relating to our short-term and long-term debt and do not include any fair value adjustments, discounts or premiums.
(2)Amounts represent the expected interest payments relating to our short-term and long-term debt. We have outstanding interest rate swap agreements accounted for as fair value hedges that have the economic effect of changing fixed interest rates associated with some of our U.S. Dollar Global Notes to variable interest rates. The impact of our outstanding interest rate swaps at October 31, 2020 was factored into the calculation of the future interest payments on debt.
(3)Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. These purchase obligations are related principally to inventory and other items. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty. Purchase obligations also exclude open purchase orders that are routine arrangements entered into in the ordinary course of business as they are difficult to quantify in a meaningful way. Even though open purchase orders are considered enforceable and legally binding, the terms generally allow us the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust terms based on our business needs prior to the delivery of goods or performance of services.
(4)Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan Contributions. In fiscal year 2021, we expect to contribute approximately $77 million to non-U.S. pension plans, $34 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified plan participants and $5 million to cover benefit claims for our post-retirement benefit plans. Our policy is to fund our pension plans so that we meet at least the minimum contribution required by local government, funding and taxing authorities. Expected contributions and payments to our pension and post-retirement benefit plans are excluded from the contractual obligations table because they do not represent contractual cash outflows as they are dependent on numerous factors which may result in a wide range of outcomes. For more information on our retirement and post-retirement benefit plans, see Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(5)Cost Savings Plans. As a result of our approved restructuring plans, we expect to make future cash payments of approximately $0.5 billion. We expect to make future cash payments of $0.2 billion in fiscal year 2021 with remaining cash payments through fiscal year 2023. These payments have been excluded from the contractual obligations table because they do not represent contractual cash outflows and there is uncertainty as to the timing of these payments. For more information on our restructuring activities that are part of our cost improvements, see Note 3, “Restructuring and Other Charges”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(6)Uncertain Tax Positions. As of October 31, 2020, we had approximately $475 million of recorded liabilities and related interest and penalties pertaining to uncertain tax positions. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate as to when or if cash settlement with the tax authorities might occur due to the uncertainties related to these tax matters. Payments of these obligations would result from settlements with taxing authorities. For more information on our uncertain tax positions, see Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. These potential payments have been excluded from the contractual obligations table because they do not represent contractual cash outflows and there is uncertainty as to the timing of these potential payments.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Payments Due by Period |
| | Total | | 1 Year or Less | | 1-3 Years | | 3-5 Years | | More than 5 Years |
| | In millions |
Principal payments on debt(1) | $ | 4,539 |
| | $ | 129 |
| | $ | 1,955 |
| | $ | 1,245 |
| | $ | 1,210 |
|
Interest payments on debt(2) | 1,890 |
| | 214 |
| | 273 |
| | 157 |
| | 1,246 |
|
Purchase obligations(3) | 372 |
| | 176 |
| | 178 |
| | 18 |
| | — |
|
Operating lease obligations(4) | 1,340 |
| | 284 |
| | 399 |
| | 262 |
| | 395 |
|
Capital lease obligations(5) | 676 |
| | 249 |
| | 344 |
| | 80 |
| | 3 |
|
Total(6)(7)(8)(9) | $ | 8,817 |
| | $ | 1,052 |
| | $ | 3,149 |
| | $ | 1,762 |
| | $ | 2,854 |
|
| |
(1)
| Amounts represent the principal cash payments relating to our short-term and long-term debt and do not include any fair value adjustments, discounts or premiums. |
| |
(2)
| Amounts represent the expected interest payments relating to our short-term and long-term debt. We have outstanding interest rate swap agreements accounted for as fair value hedges that have the economic effect of changing fixed interest rates associated with some of our U.S. Dollar Global Notes to variable interest rates. The impact of our outstanding interest rate swaps at October 31, 2019 was factored into the calculation of the future interest payments on debt. |
| |
(3)
| Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. These purchase obligations are related principally to inventory and other items. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty. Purchase obligations also exclude open purchase orders that are routine arrangements entered into in the ordinary course of business as they are difficult to quantify in a meaningful way. Even though open purchase orders are considered enforceable and legally binding, the terms generally allow us the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust terms based on our business needs prior to the delivery of goods or performance of services. |
| |
(4)
| Amounts represent the operating lease obligations, net of total sublease income of $130 million. |
| |
(5)
| Amounts represent the capital lease obligations, including total capital lease interest obligations of $64 million. |
| |
(6)
| Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan Contributions. In fiscal year 2020, we expect to contribute approximately $76 million to non-U.S. pension plans, $36 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified plan participants and $6 million to cover benefit claims for our post-retirement benefit plans. Our policy is to fund our pension plans so that we meet at least the minimum contribution required by local government, funding and taxing authorities. Expected contributions and payments to our pension and post-retirement benefit plans are excluded from the contractual obligations table because they do not represent contractual cash outflows as they are dependent on numerous factors which may result in a wide range of outcomes. For more information on our retirement and post-retirement benefit plans, see Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
| |
(7)
| Cost Savings Plans. As a result of our approved restructuring plans, including the Fiscal 2020 plan, we expect to make future cash payments of approximately $1.0 billion. We expect to make future cash payments of $418 million in fiscal year 2020 with remaining cash payments through fiscal year 2023. These payments have been excluded from the contractual obligations table because they do not represent contractual cash outflows and there is uncertainty as to the timing of these payments. For more information on our restructuring activities that are part of our cost improvements, see Note 3, “Restructuring and Other Charges”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
| |
(8)
| Uncertain Tax Positions. As of October 31, 2019, we had approximately $509 million of recorded liabilities and related interest and penalties pertaining to uncertain tax positions. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate as to when cash settlement with the tax authorities might occur due to the uncertainties related to these tax matters. Payments of these obligations would result from settlements with taxing authorities. For more information on our uncertain tax positions, see Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
| |
(9)
| Payment of one-time transition taxes under the TCJA. The TCJA made significant changes to U.S. tax law resulting in a one-time gross transition tax of $3.0 billion on accumulated foreign earnings. We expect the actual cash payments for the tax to be much lower as we expect to reduce the overall liability by more than half once existing and future credits and other balance sheet tax attributes are used. The payments associated with this one-time transition tax will be paid over eight years and began in fiscal year 2019.
|
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As part of our ongoing business, we have not participated in transactions that generate material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
We have third-party short-term financing arrangements intended to facilitate the working capital requirements of certain customers. For more information on our third-party short-term financing arrangements, see Note 7 “Supplementary Financial Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risks that could impact our financial position and results of operations. Our risk management strategy with respect to these market risks may include the use of derivative instruments. We use derivative contracts only to manage existing underlying exposures. Accordingly, we do not use derivative contracts for speculative purposes. Our risks, risk management strategy and a sensitivity analysis estimating the effects of changes in fair value for each of these exposures are outlined below.
Actual gains and losses in the future may differ materially from the sensitivity analyses based on changes in the timing and amount of foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate movements and our actual exposures and derivatives in place at the time of the change, as well as the effectiveness of the derivative to hedge the related exposure.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in our sales commitments, anticipated sales, anticipated purchases and assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We transact business in over 40 currencies worldwide, of which the most significant foreign currencies to our operations for fiscal year 20192020 were the euro, Chinese yuan renminbi, the Japanese yen and the British pound. For most currencies, we are a net receiver of the foreign currency and therefore benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currency. Even where we are a net receiver of the foreign currency, a weaker U.S. dollar may adversely affect certain expense figures, if taken alone.
We use a combination of forward contracts and at times, options designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in our forecasted net revenue and, to a lesser extent in cost of sales. In addition, when debt is denominated in a foreign currency, we may use swaps to exchange the foreign currency principal and interest obligations for U.S. dollar-denominated amounts to manage the exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We also use other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments consisting primarily of forward contracts to hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures. Alternatively, we may choose not to hedge the risk associated with our foreign currency exposures, primarily if such exposure acts as a natural hedge for offsetting amounts denominated in the same currency or if the currency is too difficult or too expensive to hedge.
We have performed sensitivity analyses for continuing operations as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, using a modeling technique that measures the change in the fair values arising from a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the levels of foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, with all other variables held constant. The analyses cover all of our foreign currency derivative contracts offset by underlying exposures. The foreign currency exchange rates we used in performing the sensitivity analysis were based on market rates in effect at October 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019. The sensitivity analyses indicated that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates would result in a foreign exchange fair value loss of $81$77 million and $75$81 million at October 31, 20192020 and October 31, 2018,2019, respectively.
Interest rate risk
We also are exposed to interest rate risk related to debt we have issued and our investment portfolio.
We issue long-term debt in either U.S. dollars or foreign currencies based on market conditions at the time of financing. We oftenmay use interest rate and/or currency swaps to modify the market risk exposures in connection with the debt to achieve U.S. dollar LIBOR-based floating interest expense. The swap transactions generally involve the exchange of fixed for floating interest payments. However, we may choose not to swap fixed for floating interest payments or may terminate a previously executed swap if we believe a larger proportion of fixed-rate debt would be beneficial.
In order to hedge the fair value of certain fixed-rate investments, we may enter into interest rate swaps that convert fixed interest returns into variable interest returns. We may use cash flow hedges to hedge the variability of LIBOR-basedin interest income received on certain variable-rate investments. We may also enter into interest rate swaps that convert variable rate interest returns into fixed-rate interest returns.
We have performed sensitivity analyses as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, using a modeling technique that measures the change in the fair values arising from a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the levels of interest rates across the entire yield curve, with all other variables held constant. The analyses cover our debt, investments and interest rate swaps. The analyses use actual or approximate maturities for the debt, investments and interest rate swaps. The discount rates used were based on the market interest rates in effect at October 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019. The sensitivity analyses indicated that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in interest rates would have resulted in a loss in the fair values of our debt and investments, net of interest rate swaps, of $36 million at October 31, 2020 and $49 million at October 31, 2019 and $69 million at October 31, 2018.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of HP Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of HP Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2019,2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2019,2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated December 12, 201910, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Adoption of New Accounting Standard
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method for recognizing revenue as a result ofin 2019 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and the amendments effective November 1, 2018 underand its method of accounting for leases in 2020 due to the modified retrospective method. See below for discussionadoption of our related critical audit matter.Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) effective November 1, 2019.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
|
| | | | |
| Income Taxes |
| Description of the Matter | As described in Notes 1 and 6 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and approximately 58several other countries and is subject to routine corporate income tax audits in many of those jurisdictions. Uncertainty in the Company’s tax positions may arise as tax laws are subject to interpretation and the Company’s positions are subject to examination by taxing authorities, which may result in assessments of additional amounts owed. Determining the income tax provision for these potential assessments and recording the related effects requires significant management judgment in estimating whether a tax position’s technical merits are more-likely-than-not to be sustained and measuring the amount of tax benefit that qualifies for recognition. Additionally, the Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount which are more likely than not to be realized. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considers certain subjective factors such as future market growth, forecasted earnings, future taxable income, mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which they operate and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Our assessment of management’s analyses of the reserve for uncertain tax positions and the realizability of its deferred tax assets are significant to our audit because the amounts are material to the financial statements and the assessment process involves significant judgment. For example, management’s assumptions that may be affected by future market and economic conditions or interpretations of tax laws and legal rulings are challenging to audit. |
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We tested controls over management’s processes relating to the recording of unrecognized tax benefits, including controls over the Company’s process to assess the technical merits of its uncertain tax positions, and the realizability of deferred tax assets, including the development of the above described assumptions and judgments. Our audit procedures included an evaluation of the Company’s key assumptions and judgments and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used to determine the amount of unrecognized tax benefits recognized. For example, we evaluated the measurement of the amounts recorded taking into consideration the applicable tax laws. laws and the Company’s positions examined by taxing authorities. We also evaluated the key assumptions and judgments used by management in determining the need for a valuation allowance and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the Company’s process. For example, we compared the projections of future taxable income with the actual results of prior periods as well as management’s consideration of current industry and economic trends. In each of these areas, we involved our tax professionals to assess the technical merits of the Company’s tax positions. This included assessing the Company’s correspondence with the relevant tax authorities and evaluating income tax opinions or other third-party advice obtained by the Company. |
| Revenue Recognition |
| Description of the Matter | As described in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company enters into certain contracts to sell their products and services that contain non-standard terms and conditions and multiple performance obligations. For such contracts, significant interpretation may be required to determine the appropriate accounting, including the allocation of the transaction price among performance obligations in the arrangement and the timing of the transfer of control of promised goods or services for each of those performance obligations. In addition, the Company reduces revenue for customer and distributor programs and incentive offerings including rebates, promotions, other volume-based incentives and expected returns. The Company uses significant estimates to determine the expected variable consideration for such programs based on factors like historical experience, forecasted sales, expected customer behavior and market conditions. Also, as discussed above, the Company adopted the new revenue recognition standard, which added further complexity and judgment related to the transition amount recorded at the date of adoption. Our assessment of management’s evaluation of the appropriate accounting for revenue contracts and the determination of the variable consideration for sales incentives and implementation of the new revenue recognition standard are significant to our audit because the amounts are material to the financial statements and the assessment process involves significant judgment. |
|
| | | | |
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We tested relevant controls over the identified risks related to the Company’s implementation of the new revenue recognition standard and the accounting for revenue recognition, including the controls to evaluate the appropriate accounting treatment for contracts containing non-standard terms and conditions and multiple performance obligations and the controls related to the estimation process to record the variable consideration related to certain sales incentives. Our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating how the Company applied the new revenue recognition standard to its contracts and assessing how the Company applied judgment to determine the transition amount and disclosures, inspection of contracts entered into during the period, evaluation of management’s judgments related to the interpretation of certain contract provisions including the identification of performance obligations, the method of allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the arrangement, and the assessment of the appropriateness of the amount of revenue recognized. We also evaluated the Company’s key assumptions and judgments and tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used to determine the variable consideration for sales incentives. This included analyzing data related to the historical experience of sales incentive payments as well as understanding the current market dynamics that can affect the estimate of variable consideration to assess the Company’s judgments and estimates. |
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2000
San Jose, California
December 12, 2019
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of HP Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited HP Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, HP Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2019,2020, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of HP Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2019,2020, and the related notes and our report dated December 12, 201910, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
December 12, 2019
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
HP’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. HP’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. HP’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of HP; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of HP are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of HP; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of HP’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
HP’s management assessed the effectiveness of HP’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2019,2020, utilizing the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 framework). Based on the assessment by HP’s management, we determined that HP’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2019.2020. The effectiveness of HP’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 20192020 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, HP’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears on page 5456 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
| | | | | | | |
| /s/ ENRIQUE LORES | | /s/ STEVE FIELERMARIE MYERS |
Enrique Lores President and Chief Executive Officer December 12, 201910, 2020 | | Steve FielerMarie Myers
Acting Chief Financial Officer December 12, 201910, 2020 |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions, except per share amounts |
| Net revenue | $ | 56,639 | | | $ | 58,756 | | | $ | 58,472 | |
| Costs and expenses: | | | | | |
| Cost of revenue | 46,202 | | | 47,586 | | | 47,803 | |
| Research and development | 1,478 | | | 1,499 | | | 1,404 | |
| Selling, general and administrative | 4,906 | | | 5,368 | | | 5,099 | |
| Restructuring and other charges | 462 | | | 275 | | | 132 | |
| Acquisition-related charges | 16 | | | 35 | | | 123 | |
| Amortization of intangible assets | 113 | | | 116 | | | 80 | |
| Total costs and expenses | 53,177 | | | 54,879 | | | 54,641 | |
| Earnings from operations | 3,462 | | | 3,877 | | | 3,831 | |
| Interest and other, net | (231) | | | (1,354) | | | (818) | |
| Earnings before taxes | 3,231 | | | 2,523 | | | 3,013 | |
| (Provision for) benefit from taxes | (387) | | | 629 | | | 2,314 | |
| Net earnings | $ | 2,844 | | | $ | 3,152 | | | $ | 5,327 | |
| | | | | |
| Net earnings per share: | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 2.01 | | | $ | 2.08 | | | $ | 3.30 | |
| Diluted | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | 2.07 | | | $ | 3.26 | |
| | | | | |
| Weighted-average shares used to compute net earnings per share: | | | | | |
| Basic | 1,413 | | | 1,515 | | | 1,615 | |
| Diluted | 1,420 | | | 1,524 | | | 1,634 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions, except per share amounts |
| Net revenue | $ | 58,756 |
| | $ | 58,472 |
| | $ | 52,056 |
|
| Costs and expenses: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cost of revenue | 47,586 |
| | 47,803 |
| | 42,478 |
|
| Research and development | 1,499 |
| | 1,404 |
| | 1,190 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 5,368 |
| | 5,099 |
| | 4,532 |
|
| Restructuring and other charges | 275 |
| | 132 |
| | 362 |
|
| Acquisition-related charges | 35 |
| | 123 |
| | 125 |
|
| Amortization of intangible assets | 116 |
| | 80 |
| | 1 |
|
| Total costs and expenses | 54,879 |
| | 54,641 |
| | 48,688 |
|
| Earnings from operations | 3,877 |
| | 3,831 |
| | 3,368 |
|
| Interest and other, net | (1,354 | ) | | (818 | ) | | (92 | ) |
| Earnings before taxes | 2,523 |
| | 3,013 |
| | 3,276 |
|
| Benefit from (provision for) taxes | 629 |
| | 2,314 |
| | (750 | ) |
| Net earnings | $ | 3,152 |
| | $ | 5,327 |
| | $ | 2,526 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net earnings per share: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | $ | 2.08 |
| | $ | 3.30 |
| | $ | 1.50 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 2.07 |
| | $ | 3.26 |
| | $ | 1.48 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Weighted-average shares used to compute net earnings per share: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | 1,515 |
| | 1,615 |
| | 1,688 |
|
| Diluted | 1,524 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 1,702 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Net earnings | $ | 2,844 | | | $ | 3,152 | | | $ | 5,327 | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income before taxes: | | | | | |
| Change in unrealized components of available-for-sale debt securities: | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period | 2 | | | 1 | | | (3) | |
| Losses (gains) reclassified into earnings | 0 | | | 3 | | | (5) | |
| 2 | | | 4 | | | (8) | |
| Change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges: | | | | | |
| Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period | (201) | | | 252 | | | 341 | |
| (Gains) losses reclassified into earnings | (85) | | | (380) | | | 258 | |
| | (286) | | | (128) | | | 599 | |
| Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans: | | | | | |
| (Losses) gains arising during the period | (29) | | | (303) | | | 11 | |
| Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit | 83 | | | 43 | | | 48 | |
| Curtailments, settlements and other | 215 | | | 42 | | | 3 | |
| | 269 | | | (218) | | | 62 | |
| Change in cumulative translation adjustment | (4) | | | 4 | | | 0 | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income before taxes | (19) | | | (338) | | | 653 | |
| Benefit from (provision for) taxes | 1 | | | (42) | | | (80) | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes | (18) | | | (380) | | | 573 | |
| Comprehensive income | $ | 2,826 | | | $ | 2,772 | | | $ | 5,900 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
| Net earnings | $ | 3,152 |
| | $ | 5,327 |
| | $ | 2,526 |
|
| Other comprehensive (loss) income before taxes: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Change in unrealized components of available-for-sale debt securities: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period | 1 |
| | (3 | ) | | 4 |
|
| Losses (gains) reclassified into earnings | 3 |
| | (5 | ) | | — |
|
| | 4 |
| | (8 | ) | | 4 |
|
| Change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period | 252 |
| | 341 |
| | (651 | ) |
| (Gains) losses reclassified into earnings | (380 | ) | | 258 |
| | 199 |
|
| | (128 | ) | | 599 |
| | (452 | ) |
| Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| (Losses) gains arising during the period | (303 | ) | | 11 |
| | 455 |
|
| Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit | 43 |
| | 48 |
| | 74 |
|
| Curtailments, settlements and other | 42 |
| | 3 |
| | 3 |
|
| | (218 | ) | | 62 |
| | 532 |
|
| Change in cumulative translation adjustment | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other comprehensive (loss) income before taxes | (338 | ) | | 653 |
| | 84 |
|
| Provision for taxes | (42 | ) | | (80 | ) | | (64 | ) |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes | (380 | ) | | 573 |
| | 20 |
|
| Comprehensive income | $ | 2,772 |
| | $ | 5,900 |
| | $ | 2,546 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions, except par value |
| ASSETS | | | |
| Current assets: | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,864 | | | $ | 4,537 | |
| Accounts receivable, net | 5,381 | | | 6,031 | |
| Inventory | 5,963 | | | 5,734 | |
| Other current assets | 4,440 | | | 3,875 | |
| Total current assets | 20,648 | | | 20,177 | |
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 2,627 | | | 2,794 | |
| Goodwill | 6,380 | | | 6,372 | |
| Other non-current assets | 5,026 | | | 4,124 | |
| Total assets | $ | 34,681 | | | $ | 33,467 | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | |
| Notes payable and short-term borrowings | $ | 674 | | | $ | 357 | |
| Accounts payable | 14,704 | | | 14,793 | |
| Other current liabilities | 10,842 | | | 10,143 | |
| Total current liabilities | 26,220 | | | 25,293 | |
| Long-term debt | 5,543 | | | 4,780 | |
| Other non-current liabilities | 5,146 | | | 4,587 | |
| Commitments and contingencies | | | |
| Stockholders’ deficit: | | | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value (300 shares authorized; 0ne issued) | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Common stock, $0.01 par value (9,600 shares authorized; 1,304 and 1,458 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2020, and 2019 respectively) | 13 | | | 15 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | 963 | | | 835 | |
| Accumulated deficit | (1,961) | | | (818) | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,243) | | | (1,225) | |
| Total stockholders’ deficit | (2,228) | | | (1,193) | |
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit | $ | 34,681 | | | $ | 33,467 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions, except par value |
| ASSETS | |
| | |
|
| Current assets: | |
| | |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,537 |
| | $ | 5,166 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | 6,031 |
| | 5,113 |
|
| Inventory | 5,734 |
| | 6,062 |
|
| Other current assets | 3,875 |
| | 5,046 |
|
| Total current assets | 20,177 |
| | 21,387 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 2,794 |
| | 2,198 |
|
| Goodwill | 6,372 |
| | 5,968 |
|
| Other non-current assets | 4,124 |
| | 5,069 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 33,467 |
| | $ | 34,622 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | |
| | |
|
| Current liabilities: | |
| | |
|
| Notes payable and short-term borrowings | $ | 357 |
| | $ | 1,463 |
|
| Accounts payable | 14,793 |
| | 14,816 |
|
| Other current liabilities | 10,143 |
| | 8,852 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 25,293 |
| | 25,131 |
|
| Long-term debt | 4,780 |
| | 4,524 |
|
| Other non-current liabilities | 4,587 |
| | 5,606 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies |
|
| |
|
|
| Stockholders’ deficit: |
|
| |
|
|
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value (300 shares authorized; none issued) | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock, $0.01 par value (9,600 shares authorized; 1,458 and 1,560 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2019, and 2018 respectively) | 15 |
| | 16 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 835 |
| | 663 |
|
| Accumulated deficit | (818 | ) | | (473 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,225 | ) | | (845 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ deficit | (1,193 | ) | | (639 | ) |
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit | $ | 33,467 |
| | $ | 34,622 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions | | In millions |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |
| | |
| | |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Net earnings | $ | 3,152 |
| | $ | 5,327 |
| | $ | 2,526 |
| Net earnings | $ | 2,844 | | | $ | 3,152 | | | $ | 5,327 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | |
| | |
| | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 744 |
| | 528 |
| | 354 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 789 | | | 744 | | | 528 | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | 297 |
| | 268 |
| | 224 |
| Stock-based compensation expense | 278 | | | 297 | | | 268 | |
| Restructuring and other charges | 275 |
| | 132 |
| | 362 |
| Restructuring and other charges | 462 | | | 275 | | | 132 | |
| Deferred taxes on earnings | 133 |
| | (3,653 | ) | | 238 |
| Deferred taxes on earnings | 70 | | | 133 | | | (3,653) | |
| Defined benefit plan settlement charges | | Defined benefit plan settlement charges | 214 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Other, net | 254 |
| | 319 |
| | 134 |
| Other, net | 325 | | | 254 | | | 319 | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | | | | | | Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | |
| Accounts receivable | (761 | ) | | (491 | ) | | (453 | ) | Accounts receivable | 575 | | | (761) | | | (491) | |
| Inventory | (68 | ) | | (136 | ) | | (1,346 | ) | Inventory | (386) | | | (68) | | | (136) | |
| Accounts payable | (53 | ) | | 1,429 |
| | 2,161 |
| Accounts payable | (35) | | | (53) | | | 1,429 | |
| Net investment in leases | | Net investment in leases | (152) | | | — | | | — | |
| Taxes on earnings | (851 | ) | | 389 |
| | 73 |
| Taxes on earnings | (147) | | | (851) | | | 389 | |
| Restructuring and other | (154 | ) | | (237 | ) | | (233 | ) | Restructuring and other | (489) | | | (154) | | | (237) | |
| Other assets and liabilities | 1,686 |
| | 653 |
| | (363 | ) | Other assets and liabilities | (32) | | | 1,686 | | | 653 | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 4,654 |
| | 4,528 |
| | 3,677 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 4,316 | | | 4,654 | | | 4,528 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |
| | |
| | |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
| Investment in property, plant and equipment | (671 | ) | | (546 | ) | | (402 | ) | Investment in property, plant and equipment | (580) | | | (671) | | | (546) | |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | — |
| | 172 |
| | 69 |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 3 | | | 0 | | | 172 | |
| Purchases of available-for-sale securities and other investments | (80 | ) | | (367 | ) | | (1,400 | ) | Purchases of available-for-sale securities and other investments | (693) | | | (80) | | | (367) | |
| Maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities and other investments | 771 |
| | 847 |
| | 231 |
| Maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities and other investments | 417 | | | 771 | | | 847 | |
| Collateral posted for derivative instruments | (32 | ) | | (1,165 | ) | | (1,170 | ) | Collateral posted for derivative instruments | (163) | | | (32) | | | (1,165) | |
| Collateral returned for derivative instruments | 32 |
| | 1,379 |
| | 955 |
| Collateral returned for derivative instruments | 0 | | | 32 | | | 1,379 | |
| Payments made in connection with business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (458 | ) | | (1,036 | ) | | — |
| Payments made in connection with business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | 0 | | | (458) | | | (1,036) | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (438 | ) | | (716 | ) | | (1,717 | ) | Net cash used in investing activities | (1,016) | | | (438) | | | (716) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | |
| | |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
| (Payments of) Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturities less than 90 days, net | (856 | ) | | 743 |
| | 202 |
| (Payments of) Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturities less than 90 days, net | 0 | | | (856) | | | 743 | |
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturities greater than 90 days | — |
| | 712 |
| | 887 |
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturities greater than 90 days | 27 | | | 0 | | | 712 | |
| Proceeds from debt, net of issuance costs | 127 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| Proceeds from debt, net of issuance costs | 3,081 | | | 127 | | | 0 | |
| Payment of short-term borrowings with original maturities greater than 90 days | — |
| | (1,596 | ) | | (3 | ) | Payment of short-term borrowings with original maturities greater than 90 days | 0 | | | 0 | | | (1,596) | |
| Payment of debt | (680 | ) | | (2,098 | ) | | (84 | ) | Payment of debt | (1,849) | | | (680) | | | (2,098) | |
| Settlement of cash flow hedges | — |
| | — |
| | (9 | ) | |
| Stock-based award activities | (61 | ) | | 52 |
| | 57 |
| |
| Stock-based award activities and others | | Stock-based award activities and others | (128) | | | (61) | | | 52 | |
| Repurchase of common stock | (2,405 | ) | | (2,557 | ) | | (1,412 | ) | Repurchase of common stock | (3,107) | | | (2,405) | | | (2,557) | |
| Cash dividends paid | (970 | ) | | (899 | ) | | (894 | ) | Cash dividends paid | (997) | | | (970) | | | (899) | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (4,845 | ) | | (5,643 | ) | | (1,251 | ) | Net cash used in financing activities | (2,973) | | | (4,845) | | | (5,643) | |
| (Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents | (629 | ) | | (1,831 | ) | | 709 |
| |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 327 | | | (629) | | | (1,831) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 5,166 |
| | 6,997 |
| | 6,288 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 4,537 | | | 5,166 | | | 6,997 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 4,537 |
| | $ | 5,166 |
| | $ | 6,997 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 4,864 | | | $ | 4,537 | | | $ | 5,166 | |
| | Supplemental cash flow disclosures: | |
| | |
| | |
| Supplemental cash flow disclosures: | | | | | |
| Income taxes paid, net of refunds | $ | 89 |
| | $ | 951 |
| | $ | 438 |
| Income taxes paid, net of refunds | $ | 464 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 951 | |
| Interest expense paid | $ | 240 |
|
| $ | 329 |
|
| $ | 322 |
| Interest expense paid | $ | 227 | | | $ | 240 | | | $ | 329 | |
| Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities: | |
| Purchase of assets under capital leases | $ | 366 |
| | $ | 258 |
| | $ | 200 |
| |
| Purchase of assets under finance leases | | Purchase of assets under finance leases | $ | 19 | | | $ | 366 | | | $ | 258 | |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Common Stock | | Additional
Paid-in Capital | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Deficit |
| | Common Stock | | Additional
Paid-in Capital | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders' Deficit | | Number of Shares | | Par Value | | Accumulated Deficit | |
| | Number of Shares | | Par Value | | Accumulated Deficit | | | In millions, except number of shares in thousands |
| | In millions, except number of shares in thousands | |
| Balance October 31, 2016 | 1,712,091 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 1,030 |
| | $ | (3,498 | ) | | $ | (1,438 | ) | | $ | (3,889 | ) | |
| Net earnings | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2,526 |
| |
|
| | 2,526 |
| |
| Other comprehensive income, net of taxes | |
| | |
| | |
| |
|
| | 20 |
| | 20 |
| |
| Comprehensive income | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2,546 |
| |
| Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other | 18,532 |
| |
|
| | 52 |
| |
|
| |
|
| | 52 |
| |
| Repurchases of common stock | (81,043 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (926 | ) | | (520 | ) | |
|
| | (1,447 | ) | |
| Cash dividends ($0.53 per common share) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | (894 | ) | |
|
| | (894 | ) | |
| Stock-based compensation expense |
|
| |
|
| | 224 |
| |
|
| |
|
| | 224 |
| |
| Balance October 31, 2017 | 1,649,580 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 380 |
| | $ | (2,386 | ) | | $ | (1,418 | ) | | $ | (3,408 | ) | Balance October 31, 2017 | 1,649,580 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 380 | | | $ | (2,386) | | | $ | (1,418) | | | $ | (3,408) | |
| Net earnings |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 5,327 |
| |
|
| | 5,327 |
| Net earnings | | 5,327 | | | 5,327 | |
| Other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 573 |
| | 573 |
| Other comprehensive income, net of taxes | | 573 | | | 573 | |
| Comprehensive income |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 5,900 |
| Comprehensive income | | 5,900 | |
| Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other | 21,728 |
| |
|
| | 47 |
| |
|
| |
|
| | 47 |
| Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other | 21,728 | | | 47 | | | 47 | |
| Repurchases of common stock | (111,038 | ) | |
|
| | (32 | ) | | (2,515 | ) | |
|
| | (2,547 | ) | Repurchases of common stock | (111,038) | | | (32) | | | (2,515) | | | (2,547) | |
| Cash dividends ($0.56 per common share) |
|
| �� |
|
| |
|
| | (899 | ) | |
|
| | (899 | ) | Cash dividends ($0.56 per common share) | | (899) | | | (899) | |
| Stock-based compensation expense |
|
| |
|
| | 268 |
| |
|
| |
|
| | 268 |
| Stock-based compensation expense | | 268 | | | 268 | |
| Balance October 31, 2018 | 1,560,270 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 663 |
| | $ | (473 | ) | | $ | (845 | ) | | $ | (639 | ) | Balance October 31, 2018 | 1,560,270 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 663 | | | $ | (473) | | | $ | (845) | | | $ | (639) | |
| Net earnings |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 3,152 |
| |
|
| | 3,152 |
| Net earnings | | 3,152 | | | 3,152 | |
| Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | (380 | ) | | (380 | ) | Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes | | (380) | | | (380) | |
| Comprehensive income |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 2,772 |
| Comprehensive income | | 2,772 | |
| Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other | 15,047 |
| |
|
| | (69 | ) | |
|
| |
|
| | (69 | ) | Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other | 15,047 | | | (69) | | | (69) | |
| Repurchases of common stock | (117,598 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (2,340 | ) | |
|
| | (2,396 | ) | Repurchases of common stock | (117,598) | | | (1) | | | (55) | | | (2,340) | | | (2,396) | |
| Cash dividends ($0.64 per common share) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | (968 | ) | |
|
| | (968 | ) | Cash dividends ($0.64 per common share) | | (968) | | | (968) | |
| Stock-based compensation expense |
|
| |
|
| | 296 |
| |
|
| |
|
| | 296 |
| Stock-based compensation expense | | 296 | | | 296 | |
| Adjustment for adoption of accounting standards | | Adjustment for adoption of accounting standards | | (189) | | | (189) | |
| Balance October 31, 2019 | | Balance October 31, 2019 | 1,457,719 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 835 | | | $ | (818) | | | $ | (1,225) | | | $ | (1,193) | |
| Net earnings | | Net earnings | | 2,844 | | | 2,844 | |
| Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes | | Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes | | (18) | | | (18) | |
| Comprehensive income | | Comprehensive income | | 2,826 | |
| Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other | | Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other | 14,065 | | | (37) | | | (37) | |
| Repurchases of common stock | | Repurchases of common stock | (167,857) | | | (2) | | | (113) | | | (3,017) | | | (3,132) | |
| Cash dividends ($0.70 per common share) | | Cash dividends ($0.70 per common share) | | (997) | | | (997) | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | | Stock-based compensation expense | | 278 | | | 278 | |
| Adjustment for adoption of accounting standards (Note 1) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (189 | ) | | — |
| | (189 | ) | Adjustment for adoption of accounting standards (Note 1) | | 27 | | | 27 | |
| Balance October 31, 2019 | 1,457,719 |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | 835 |
| | $ | (818 | ) | | $ | (1,225 | ) | | $ | (1,193 | ) | |
| Balance October 31, 2020 | | Balance October 31, 2020 | 1,303,927 | | | $ | 13 | | | $ | 963 | | | $ | (1,961) | | | $ | (1,243) | | | $ | (2,228) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of HP and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP.
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of HP and its subsidiaries and affiliates in which HP has a controlling financial interest or is the primary beneficiary. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Reclassifications
Effective at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2019, HP implemented an organizational change to align its business unit financial reporting more closely with its current business structure. HP reflected this change to its business unit information in prior reporting periods on an as-if basis. The reporting change had no impact to previously reported segment net revenue, consolidated net revenue, earnings from operations, net earnings or net EPS.
HP has reclassified certain prior-year amounts to conform to the current-year presentation as a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost”. This adoption had no impact on previously reported consolidated net revenue, net earnings or net EPS.
For detailed discussion see Note 2, “Segment Information”.presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in HP’s Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates. As of October 31, 2020, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will impact our business going forward depends on numerous dynamic factors which we cannot reliably predict. As a result, many of our estimates and assumptions required increased judgment and may carry a higher degree of variability and volatility. As the events continue to evolve with respect to the pandemic, our estimates may materially change in future periods.
Foreign Currency Translation
HP predominantly uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in non-U.S. dollars are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates for monetary assets and liabilities and at historical exchange rates for nonmonetary assets and liabilities. Net revenue, costs and expenses denominated in non-U.S. dollars are recorded in U.S. dollars at monthly average exchange rates prevailing during the period. HP includes gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Certain foreign subsidiaries designate the local currency as their functional currency, and HP records the translation of their assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars at the balance sheet dates as translation adjustments and includes them as a component of accumulatedAccumulated other comprehensive loss.
Separation Transaction
On November 1, 2015, Hewlett-Packard Company completed the separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“Hewlett Packard Enterprise”), Hewlett-Packard Company’s former enterprise technology infrastructure, software, services and financing businesses (the “Separation”). In connection with the Separation, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise entered into a separation and distribution agreement, an employee matters agreement and various other agreements which remain enforceable thatand provide a framework for the continuing relationships between the parties. For more information on the impacts of these agreements, see Note 7, “Supplementary Financial Information”, Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” and Note 15, “Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties”.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2018, the FASB issued guidance, which eliminates the stranded tax effects in other comprehensive income resulting from the TCJA. Because the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the TCJA, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from operations is not affected. HP early adopted this guidance in the third quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance resulted in a $69 million reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to accumulated deficit.
In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance, which addresses the improvement of the presentation of net periodic pension and net periodic post-retirement benefit cost. The guidance requires entities to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. Additionally, the guidance requires that companies present the other components of the net periodic benefit cost separately from the line item that includes service cost and any other subtotal of income from operations. The amendments in this guidance are to be applied retrospectively for presentation in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. A practical expedient allows companies to use the amount disclosed in its pension and other post-retirement plan note for the prior comparative periods as the estimation basis for applying the retrospective presentation
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
requirements. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and elected to use the practical expedient. The adoption of this guidance has no impact on net earnings. The reclassification resulted in an increase in total cost and expenses and a reduction in interest and other, net of $233 million for the twelve months ended October 31, 2018.
In November 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which addresses the presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The guidance requires entities to present the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance did not have any impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting for Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The guidance (Topic 740) requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. It also requires modified retrospective transition with a cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance resulted in $353 million of net reduction to its prepaid tax asset adjusted through accumulated deficit. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, HP corrected this impact to $47 million by recording a deferred tax asset adjusted through accumulated deficit.
In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance did not have any impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance (Topic 825-10) primarily addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, with other amendments related specifically to equity securities without readily determinable fair values applied prospectively. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance did not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. The amendments (Topic 606) are based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. HP adopted the new revenue standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 using the modified retrospective method applied to contracts that were not completed as of November 1, 2018. HP recognized the net impact of adoption as an increase to accumulated deficit by $212 million, net of tax, on November 1, 2018.
The primary changes that impact the Consolidated Financial Statements are as below:
Variable consideration - HP estimates the transaction price for elements of consideration which are variable in nature. Certain distributor programs and incentive offerings which were recorded at the date the sales incentives were offered, are now recorded at the time of revenue recognition based on estimates.
Costs to obtain a contract - The incremental costs to obtain a contract are primarily comprised of eligible sales commissions which were previously expensed as incurred. HP has capitalized such eligible sales commission costs for contracts with terms of more than one year and amortized those costs over the expected period of the benefit.
The adoption has led to certain balance sheet reclassifications pertaining to return asset and liability and repurchase reserves which impacts accounts receivable, net, inventory, other current assets and other current liabilities balances.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In August 2017, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for derivatives and hedging. The amendment improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better represent the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and made certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current U.S. GAAP. HP is required to adopt theadopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. Earlier adoption is permitted. Based on the current assessment, HP expects that theThe implementation of this guidance willdid not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance on the accounting for leasing transactions. The primary objective of this update is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring lessees to recognize a lease liability for the obligation to make lease payments and a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset for the right to use the underlying asset over the lease term. The guidance also results in some changes to lessor accounting and requires additional disclosures about all leasing arrangements.
HP adopted the standard (the “new lease standard”) as of November 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit as of the adoption date. HP elected to apply the practical expedient using the transition option whereby prior comparative periods were not retrospectively adjusted in the Consolidated Financial Statements. HP also elected the package of practical expedients, which does not require reassessment of initial direct costs, classification of a lease, and definition of a lease. The Company has elected not to record leases with an initial term of 12 months or less on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Lease expense on such leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. HP has also elected the lessee practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components for certain asset classes.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
The adoption of the new lease standard resulted in the recognition of $1.2 billion in operating lease liabilities and $1.2 billion of related ROU assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net impact of adoption to accumulated deficit as on November 1, 2019 is not material. As of November 1, 2019, there were no material finance leases for which HP was a lessee.
The new lease standard also made some changes to lessor accounting, including alignment with the new revenue recognition standard. HP now records revenue upfront on certain aspects of its as-a-service offerings and reflects financing of these offerings as cash flows from financing activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. These changes did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Refer to Note 17, “Leases”, for additional disclosures related to leases.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which requires credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, not based on incurred losses. Further, credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses limited to the amount by which fair value is below
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
amortized cost. HP is required towill adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021. Earlier adoption is permitted.2021 using a modified retrospective approach. HP is currently evaluating the timing andhas evaluated the impact of this guidancestandard on the consolidated financial statements, including accounting policies, processes, and systems and does not expect it to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance (“Topic 842”), which amends the existing accounting standards for leases. Consistent with current guidance, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification. Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than twelve months. HP will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020 and will apply the modified retrospective transition option made available in July 2018 by the FASB, whereby comparative periods will not be retrospectively presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements. HP will also elect the package of practical expedients not to reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification and initial direct costs and the lessee practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components for certain asset classes.
HP has established a cross-functional implementation team to assist in determining the scope of impact, identifying changes to its business processes, implementing a new system solution and evaluating changes to internal controls to support adoption of the new standard. HP currently expects the adoption of Topic 842 to result in an increase in right of use assets and a corresponding increase in lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of approximately $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion. Upon adoption, HP will also record revenue upfront on certain aspects of its MPS and DaaS offerings and will reflect the financing of these offerings as cash flows from financing activities on the Statement of Cash Flows. HP has substantially completed the process of quantifying the impacts that will result from applying the new guidance, and the assessment will be finalized during the first quarter of fiscal year 2020.
Revenue Recognition
General
HP recognizes revenues at a point in time or over time depicting the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which HP expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. HP follows the five-step model for revenue recognition as summarized below:
1. Identify the contract with a customer - A contract with customer exists when (i) it is approved and signed by all parties,
(ii) each party’s rights and obligations can be identified, (iii) payment terms are defined, (iv) it has commercial substance and (v) the customer has the ability and intent to pay. HP evaluates customers’ ability to pay based on various factors like historical payment experience, financial metrics and customer credit scores. While the majority of our sales contracts contain standard terms and conditions, there are certain contracts with non-standard terms and conditions.
2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract - HP evaluates each performance obligation in an arrangement to
determine whether it is distinct, such as hardware and/or service. A performance obligation constitutes distinct goods or services when the customer can benefit from such goods or services either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer and the performance obligation is distinct within the context of the contract.
3. Determine the transaction price - Transaction price is the amount of consideration to which HP expects to be entitled in
exchange for transferring goods or services to the customer. If the transaction price includes a variable amount, HP estimates the amount it expects to be entitled to using either the expected value or the most likely amount method.
HP reduces the transaction price at the time of revenue recognition for customer and distributor programs and incentive
offerings, rebates, promotions, other volume-based incentives and expected returns. HP uses estimates to determine the expected variable consideration for such programs based on factors like historical experience, expected consumer behavior and market conditions.
HP has elected the practical expedient of not accounting for significant financing components if the period between
revenue recognition and when the customer pays for the product or service is one year or less.
4. Allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract - When a sales arrangement contains multiple
performance obligations, such as hardware and/or services, HP allocates revenue to each performance obligation in proportion to their selling price. The selling price for each performance obligation is based on its SSP.Standalone Selling Price (“SSP”). HP establishes SSP using the price charged for a performance obligation when sold separately (“observable price”) and, in some instances, using the price established by management having the relevant authority. When observable price is not available, HP establishes SSP based on management judgment considering internal factors such as margin objectives, pricing practices and controls, customer segment pricing strategies and the product life-cycle.life cycle. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies and technology industry life cycles.
5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied - Revenue is recognized when, or as, a
performance obligation is satisfied by transferring control of a promised good or service to a customer. HP generally invoices the customer upon delivery of the goods or services and the payments are due as per contract terms. For fixed
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
price support or maintenance contracts that are in the nature of stand-ready obligations, payments are generally received in advance from customers and revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the duration of the contract.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
HP reports revenue net of any taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities, and the collected taxes are recorded as other current liabilities until remitted to the relevant government authority. HP includes costs related to shipping and handling in costCost of revenue.
HP records revenue on a gross basis when HP is a principal in the transaction and on a net basis when HP is acting as an agent between the customer and the vendor. HP considers several factors to determine whether it is acting as a principal or an agent, most notably whether HP is the primary obligor to the customer, has established its own pricing and has inventory and credit risks.
Hardware
HP transfers control of the products to the customer at the time the product is delivered to the customer and recognizes revenue accordingly, unless customer acceptance is uncertain or significant obligations to the customer remain unfulfilled. HP records revenue from the sale of equipment under sales-type leases as revenue at the commencement of the lease.
Services
HP recognizes revenue from fixed-price support, maintenance and other service contracts over time depicting the pattern of service delivery and recognizes the costs associated with these contracts as incurred.
Contract Assets and Liabilities
Contract assets are rights to consideration in exchange for goods or services that HP has transferred to a customer when such right is conditional on something other than the passage of time. Such contract assets are not material to HP’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contract liabilities are recorded as deferred revenues when amounts invoiced to customers are more than the revenues recognized or when payments are received in advance for fixed pricefixed-price support or maintenance contracts. The short-term and long-term deferred revenues are reported within the other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities respectively.
Cost to obtain a contract and fulfillment cost
Incremental direct costs of obtaining a contract primarily consist of sales commissions. HP has elected the practical expedient to expense as incurred the costs to obtain a contract with a benefit period equal to or less than one year. For contracts with a period of benefit greater than one year, HP capitalizes incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer and amortizes these costs over their expected period of benefit provided such costs are recoverable.
Fulfillment costs consist of set-up and transition costs related to other service contracts. These costs generate or enhance resources of HP that will be used in satisfying the performance obligation in the future and are capitalized and amortized over the expected period of the benefit, provided such costs are recoverable.
See Note 7, “Supplementary Financial Information” for details on net revenue by region, cost to obtain a contract and fulfillment cost, contract liabilities and value of remaining performance obligations.
Transition disclosure
In accordance withHP adopted the new revenue standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 using the modified retrospective method transition requirements,applied to contracts that were not completed as of November 1, 2018. HP recognized the net impact of adoption as an increase to accumulated deficit by $212 million, net of tax, on November 1, 2018.
Leases
At the inception of a contract, HP assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. The assessment is based on (1) whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset, (2) whether HP obtains the right to substantially all the economic benefit from the use of the asset throughout the period, and (3) whether HP has presented the financial statement line items impacted and adjustedright to compare to presentation underdirect the prior GAAP foruse of the asset.
All significant lease arrangements are recognized at lease commencement. Leases with a lease term of 12 months or less at inception are not recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2019Sheets and forare expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings for fiscal year ended October 31, 2019.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2019 |
| CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET ITEMS | As Reported | | Effect of Adoption | | Balances Without Adoption of Topic 606 |
| | In millions |
| ASSETS | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable, net | $ | 6,031 | | | $ | (218 | ) | | | $ | 5,813 | | |
| Inventory | 5,734 | | | 188 | | | | 5,922 | | |
| Other current assets | 3,875 | | | (188 | ) | | | 3,687 | | |
| Other non-current assets | $ | 4,124 | | | $ | (31 | ) | | | $ | 4,093 | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | | | | | |
| Other current liabilities | $ | 10,143 | | | $ | (435 | ) | | | $ | 9,708 | | |
| Accumulated deficit | $ | (818 | ) | | $ | 186 | | | | $ | (632 | ) | |
Earnings. HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summarydetermines the lease term by assuming the exercise of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019 |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS ITEMS | | As Reported | | Effect of Adoption | | Balances Without Adoption of Topic 606 |
| | In millions |
| Net revenue | | $ | 58,756 | | | | $ | (33 | ) | | | $ | 58,723 | | |
| Earnings from operations | | 3,877 | | | | (33 | ) | | | 3,844 | | |
| Earnings before taxes | | 2,523 | | | | (33 | ) | | | 2,490 | | |
| Benefit from taxes | | 629 | | | | 7 | | | | 636 | | |
| Net earnings | | $ | 3,152 | | | | $ | (26 | ) | | | $ | 3,126 | | |
Opening Balance Sheet Adjustments:
The following table presents the adoption impactrenewal options that are reasonably certain. As most of the new accounting standardsleases do not provide an implicit interest rate, HP uses the unsecured borrowing rate and risk-adjusts that rate to HP’s previously reported financial statements:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As Reported on October 31, 2018 | | Adjustments under Topic 606 | | Other (1) | | As Restated on November 1, 2018 |
| | In millions |
| ASSETS | | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable, net | $ | 5,113 | | | | $ | 213 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 5,326 | | |
| Inventory | 6,062 | | | | (203 | ) | | | — | | | | 5,859 | | |
| Other current assets | 5,046 | | | | 203 | | | | (90 | ) | | | 5,159 | | |
| Other non-current assets | $ | 5,069 | | | | $ | 33 | | | | $ | 43 | | | | $ | 5,145 | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | | | | | | | |
| Other current liabilities | $ | 8,852 | | | | $ | 458 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 9,310 | | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (845 | ) | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | (847 | ) | |
| Accumulated deficit | $ | (473 | ) | | | $ | (212 | ) | | | $ | (45 | ) | | | $ | (730 | ) | |
(1) Other includes $47 million adjustment relatedapproximate a collateralized rate at the commencement date to Topic 740.determine the present value of future payments that are reasonably certain.
Stock-Based Compensation
HP determines stock-based compensation expense based on the measurement date fair value of the award. HP recognizes compensation cost only for those awards expected to meet the service and performance vesting conditions on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. HP determines compensation costs at the aggregate grant level for service-based awards and at the individual vesting tranche level for awards with performance and/or market conditions. HP estimates the forfeiture rate based on its historical experience.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Retirement and Post-Retirement Plans
HP has various defined benefit, other contributory and non-contributory retirement and post-retirement plans. HP generally amortizes unrecognized actuarial gains and losses on a straight-line basis over the average remaining estimated service life of participants. In limited cases, HP amortizes actuarial gains and losses using the corridor approach. See Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans” for a full description of these plans and the accounting and funding policies.
Advertising cost
Costs to produce advertising are expensed as incurred during production. Costs to communicate advertising are expensed when the advertising is first run. Such costs totaled approximately $578 million, $652 million $568 million and $544$568 million in fiscal years 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, respectively.
Restructuring and Other Charges
HP records charges associated with management-approved restructuring plans to reorganize one or more of HP’s business segments, to remove duplicative headcount and infrastructure associated with business acquisitions or to simplify business processes and accelerate innovation. Restructuring charges can include severance costs to reduce a specified number of
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
employees, enhanced early retirement incentives, infrastructure charges to vacate facilities and consolidate operations, and contract cancellation costs. HP records restructuring charges based on estimated employee terminations, committed early retirements and site closure and consolidation plans. HP accrues for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that benefits will be paid and the amount is reasonably estimable. The rates used in determining severance accruals are based on existing plans, historical experiences and negotiated settlements. Other charges include non-recurring costs, including those as a result of the Separation, or information technology rationalization efforts and proxy contest activities, and are distinct from ongoing operational costs.
Taxes on Earnings
HP recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year the differences are expected to reverse. HP records a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
HP records accruals for uncertain tax positions when HP believes that it is not more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. HP makes adjustments to these accruals when facts and circumstances change, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of adjustments for uncertain tax positions, as well as any related interest and penalties.
Accounts Receivable
HP establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts for accounts receivable. HP records a specific reserve for individual accounts when HP becomes aware of specific customer circumstances, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing or deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position. If there are additional changes in circumstances related to the specific customer, HP further adjusts estimates of the recoverability of receivables. HP maintains bad debt reserves for all other customers based on a variety of factors, including the use of third-party credit risk models that generate quantitative measures of default probabilities based on market factors, the financial condition of customers, the length of time receivables are past due, trends in the weighted-average risk rating for the portfolio, macroeconomic conditions, information derived from competitive benchmarking, significant one-time events and historical experience. The past due or delinquency status of a receivable is based on the contractual payment terms of the receivable.
HP has third-party short-term financing arrangements intended to facilitate the working capital requirements of certain customers. These financing arrangements, which in certain cases provide for partial recourse, result in the transfer of HP’s trade receivables to a third party. HP reflects amounts transferred to, but not yet collected from the third party in accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For arrangements involving an element of recourse, the fair value of the recourse obligation is measured using market data from similar transactions and reported as a current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Concentrations of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject HP to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, investments, receivables from trade customers and contract manufacturers and derivatives.
HP maintains cash and cash equivalents, investments, derivatives and certain other financial instruments with various financial institutions. These financial institutions are located in many different geographic regions, and HP’s policy is designed to limit exposure from any particular institution. As part of its risk management processes, HP performs periodic evaluations of
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
the relative credit standing of these financial institutions. HP has not sustained material credit losses from instruments held at these financial institutions. HP utilizes derivative contracts to protect against the effects of foreign currency, interest rate and, on certain investment exposures. Such contracts involve the risk of non-performance by the counterparty, which could result in a material loss. The likelihood of which HP deems to be remote.
HP sells a significant portion of its products through third-party distributors and resellers and, as a result, maintains individually significant receivable balances with these parties. If the financial condition or operations of these distributors’ and resellers’ aggregated business deteriorates substantially, HP’s operating results could be adversely affected. The ten largest distributor and reseller receivable balances, which were concentrated primarily in North America and Europe, collectively represented approximately 32%47% and 39%32% of gross accounts receivable as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively. No single customer accounts for more than 10% of gross accounts receivable as of October 31, 20192020 or 2018.2019. Credit risk with respect to other accounts receivable is generally diversified due to HP’s large customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographic markets. HP performs ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of its third-party
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
distributors, resellers and other customers and may require collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances.
HP utilizes outsourced manufacturers around the world to manufacture HP-designed products. HP may purchase product components from suppliers and sell those components to its outsourced manufacturers thereby creating receivable balances from the outsourced manufacturers. The three largest outsourced manufacturer receivable balances collectively represented 77%89% and 72%77% of HP’s supplier receivables of $1,165 million$1.2 billion and $1,074 million$1.2 billion as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively. HP includes the supplier receivables in Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a gross basis. HP’s credit risk associated with these receivables is mitigated wholly or in part, by the amount HP owes to these outsourced manufacturers, as HP generally has the legal right to offset its payables to the outsourced manufacturers against these receivables. HP does not reflect the sale of these components in net revenue and does not recognize any profit on these component sales until the related products are sold by HP, at which time any profit is recognized as a reduction to cost of revenue.
HP obtains a significant number of components from single source suppliers due to technology, availability, price, quality or other considerations. The loss of a single source supplier, the deterioration of HP’s relationship with a single source supplier, or any unilateral modification to the contractual terms under which HP is supplied components by a single source supplier could adversely affect HP’s net revenue, cash flows and gross margins.
Upon completion of the Separation on November 1, 2015, HP recorded net income tax indemnification receivables from Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain income tax liabilities that HP is jointly and severally liable for, but for which it is indemnified by Hewlett Packard Enterprise under the tax matters agreement (“TMA”). The TMA was terminated during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019. The net payable as of October 31, 2019 was $98 million and net receivable as of October 31, 2018 was $1.0 billion.
Inventory
HP values inventory at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using standard cost which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. Adjustments, if required, to reduce the cost of inventory to market (net realizable value) are made, for estimated excess, obsolete or impaired balances.
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
HP reflects property, plant and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation. HP capitalizes additions and improvements and expenses maintenance and repairs as incurred. Depreciation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives are five to 40 years for buildings and improvements and three to 15 years for machinery and equipment. HP depreciates leasehold improvements over the life of the lease or the asset, whichever is shorter. HP depreciates equipment held for lease over the initial term of the lease to the equipment’s estimated residual value. On retirement or disposition, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the Consolidated Balance Sheets with any gain or loss recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Internal Use Software and Cloud Computing Arrangements
HP capitalizes external costs and directly attributable internal costs to acquire or create internal use software which are incurred subsequent to the completion of the preliminary project stage. These costs relate to activities such as software design, configuration, coding, testing, and installation. Costs related to post-implementation activities such as training and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Once the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, capitalized development costs are amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life of the software, generally not to exceed five years.
HP also enters into certain cloud-based software hosting arrangements that are accounted for as service contracts. For internal-use software obtained through a hosting arrangement that is in the nature of a service contract, HP incurs certain implementation costs such as integrating, configuring, and software customization, which are consistent with costs incurred
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
during the application development stage for on-premise software. HP applies the same guidance to determine costs that are eligible for capitalization. For these arrangements, HP amortizes the capitalized development costs straight-line over the fixed, non-cancellable term of the associated hosting arrangement plus any reasonably certain renewal periods. HP also applies the same impairment model to both internal-use software and capitalized implementation costs in a software hosting arrangement that is in the nature of a service contract.
Business Combinations
HP includes the results of operations of the acquired business in HP’s consolidated results prospectively from the acquisition date. HP allocates the purchase consideration to the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquired entity generally based on their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of these assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests in the
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
acquired entity is recorded as goodwill. The primary items that generate goodwill include the value of the synergies between the acquired company and HP, and the value of the acquired assembled workforce, neither of which qualify for recognition as an intangible asset. Acquisition-related charges are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred. These charges primarily include, direct third-party professional and legal fees, and integration-related costs.
Goodwill
HP reviews goodwill for impairment annually during its fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. HP can elect to perform a qualitative assessment to test a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment or HP can directly perform the quantitative impairment test. Based on the qualitative assessment, if HP determines that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be less than its carrying amount, a quantitative impairment test will be performed.
In the quantitative impairment test, HP compares the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount with the fair values derived most significantly from the income approach, and to a lesser extent, the market approach. Under the income approach, HP estimates the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. HP bases cash flow projections on management’s estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. HP bases the discount rate on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to the reporting unit’s ability to execute on the projected cash flows. Under the market approach, HP estimates fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable publicly-traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit. HP weights the fair value derived from the market approach depending on the level of comparability of these publicly-traded companies to the reporting unit. When market comparables are not meaningful or not available, HP estimates the fair value of a reporting unit using only the income approach.
In order to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair value of HP’s reporting units, HP compares the aggregate reporting unit fair value to HP’s market capitalization on an overall basis and calculates an implied control premium (the excess of the sum of the reporting units’ fair value over HP’s market capitalization on an overall basis). HP evaluates the control premium by comparing it to observable control premiums from recent comparable transactions. If the implied control premium is determined to not be reasonable in light of these recent transactions, HP re-evaluates its reporting unit fair values, which may result in an adjustment to the discount rate and/or other assumptions. This re-evaluation could result in a change to the estimated fair value for certain or all reporting units.
If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, goodwill is impaired and the excess of the reporting unit’s carrying value over the fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
Debt and Marketable Equity Securities Investments
HP determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluates the classifications at each balance sheet date. Debt and marketable equity securities are generally considered available-for-sale. All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. Marketable debt securities with maturities of twelve months or less are classified as short-term investments and marketable debt securities with maturities greater than twelve months are classified based on their availability for use in current operations. Marketable equity securities, including mutual funds, are classified as either short-term or long-term based on the nature of each security and its availability for use in current operations.
Debt and marketable equity securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss,other comprehensive loss, Consolidated Statement of Earnings and the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are calculated based on the specific identification method and included in interest
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. HP monitors its investment portfolio for potential impairment on a quarterly basis. When the carrying amount of an investment in debt securities exceeds its fair value and the decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary (i.e., when HP does not intend to sell the debt securities and it is not more likely than not that HP will be required to sell the debt securities prior to anticipated recovery of its amortized cost basis), HP records an impairment charge to Interest and other, net in the amount of the credit loss and the remaining amount, if any, is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Derivatives
HP uses derivative instruments, primarily forwards, swaps, treasury rate locks and at times, options, to hedge certain foreign currency, interest rate, and return on certain investment exposures. HP also may use other derivative instruments not designated as hedges, such as forwards used to hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures. HP does not use derivative instruments for
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
speculative purposes. See Note 10, “Financial Instruments” for a full description of HP’s derivative instrument activities and related accounting policies.
Loss Contingencies
HP is involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. HP records a liability for contingencies when it believes it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. See Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” for a full description of HP’s loss contingencies and related accounting policies.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information
HP is a leading global provider of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, solutions and services. HP sells to individual consumers, SMBssmall- and medium-sized businesses (“SMBs”) and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health and education sectors. HP goes to market through its extensive channel network and direct sales.
HP’s operations are organized into 3 reportable segments: Personal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments. HP’s organizational structure is based on many factors that the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) uses to evaluate, view and run its business operations, which include, but are not limited to, customer base and homogeneity of products and technology. The segments are based on this organizational structure and information reviewed by HP’s CODM to evaluate segment results. The CODM uses several metrics to evaluate the performance of the overall business, including earnings from operations, and uses these results to allocate resources to each of the segments.
A summary description of each segment is as follows:
Personal Systems offers commercial and consumer desktop and notebook PCs,(“PCs”), workstations, thin clients, commercial mobility devices, retail POSpoint-of-sale (“POS”) systems, displays and other related accessories, software, support and services. HP groups commercial notebooks, commercial desktops, commercial services, commercial mobility devices, commercial detachables and convertibles, workstations, retail POS systems and thin clients into commercial PCs and consumer notebooks, consumer desktops, consumer services and consumer detachables into consumer PCs when describing performance in these markets. Described below are HP’s global business capabilities within Personal Systems:
| |
• | Commercial PCs are optimized for use by enterprise, public sector and SMB customers, with a focus on robust designs, security, serviceability, connectivity, reliability and manageability in networked and cloud- based•Commercial PCs are optimized for use by enterprise, public sector which includes education, and SMB customers, with a focus on robust designs, security, serviceability, connectivity, reliability and manageability in networked and cloud-based environments. Additionally, HP offers a range of services and solutions to enterprise, public sector and SMB customers to help them manage the lifecycle of their PC and mobility installed base. •Consumer PCs are optimized for consumer usage, focusing on gaming, learning and working remotely, consuming multi-media for entertainment, managing personal life activities, staying connected, sharing information, getting things done for work including creating content, staying informed and secure. |
| |
• | Consumer PCs are optimized for consumer usage, focusing on gaming, consuming multi-media for entertainment, managing personal life activities, staying connected, sharing information, getting things done for work including creating content, staying informed and security.
|
Personal Systems groups its global business capabilities into the following business units when reporting business performance:
| |
• | •Notebooks consists of consumer notebooks, commercial notebooks, mobile workstations and commercial mobility devices; |
• Desktops includes consumer desktops, commercial desktops, thin clients, and retail POS systems;
| |
• | • Workstationsconsists of desktop workstations and accessories; and • consists of desktop workstations and accessories; and |
| |
• | Other consists of consumer and commercial services as well as other Personal Systems capabilities. |
Printing provides consumer and commercial printer hardware, supplies, solutionsservices and services, as well as scanning devices.solutions. Printing is also focused on imaging solutions in the commercial and industrial markets. Described below are HP’s global business capabilities within Printing.
| |
• | •Office Printing Solutions delivers HP’s office printers, supplies, services and solutions to SMBs and large enterprises. It also includes OEM hardware and solutions, and some Samsung-branded supplies. •Home Printing Solutions delivers innovative printing products, supplies, services and solutions for the home, home business and micro business customers utilizing both HP’s Ink and Laser technologies. It also includes some Samsung-branded supplies. •Graphics Solutions delivers large-format, commercial and industrial solutions and supplies to print service providers and packaging converters through a wide portfolio of printers and presses (HP DesignJet, HP Latex, HP Indigo and HP PageWide Web Presses). •3D Printing & Digital Manufacturing offers a portfolio of additive manufacturing solutions and supplies to help customers succeed in their additive and digital manufacturing journey delivers HP’s office printers, supplies, services and solutions to SMBs and large enterprises. It also includes some Samsung-branded and OEM hardware and solutions. HP goes to market through its extensive channel network and directly with HP sales. |
| |
• | Home Printing Solutions delivers innovative printing products, supplies, services and solutions for the home, home business and micro business customers utilizing both HP’s Ink and Laser technologies (including laser technology from some Samsung-branded products).
|
| |
• | Graphics Solutions delivers large-format, commercial and industrial solutions and supplies to print service providers and packaging converters through a wide portfolio of printers and presses (HP DesignJet, HP Latex, HP Stitch, HP Indigo and HP PageWide Web Presses) and related components.
|
| |
• | 3D Printing & Digital Manufacturing offers a portfolio of additive manufacturing solutions and supplies to help customers succeed in their additive and digital manufacturing journey. HP offers complete solutions in collaboration with an ecosystem of partners.
|
Printing groups its global business capabilities into the following business units when reporting business performance:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)
| |
• | Commercial Hardware consists of office printing solutions, graphics solutions and 3D Printing & Digital Manufacturing, excluding supplies;
|
| |
• | Consumer Hardware consists of home printing solutions, excluding supplies; and
|
| |
• | Supplies comprises a set of highly innovative consumable products, ranging from ink and laser cartridges to media, graphics supplies and 3D Printing & Digital Manufacturing•Consumer Hardware consists of home printing solutions, excluding supplies; and •Supplies comprises a set of highly innovative consumable products, ranging from ink and laser cartridges to media, graphics supplies and 3D printing & digital manufacturing supplies, for recurring use in consumer and commercial hardware. |
Corporate Investments includes HP Labs and certain business incubation and investment projects.
The accounting policies HP uses to derive segment results are substantially the same as those used by HP in preparing these financial statements. HP derives the results of the business segments directly from its internal management reporting system.
HP does not allocate certain operating expenses, which it manages at the corporate level, to its segments. These unallocated amounts include certain corporate governance costs and infrastructure investments, stock-based compensation expense, restructuring and other charges, acquisition-related charges and amortization of intangible assets. Pursuant to the adoption
Realignment
Effective at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2019, HP implemented an organizational change to align its business unit financial reporting more closely with its current business structure. The organizational change resulted in the transfer of certain Samsung-branded product categories from Commercial to Consumer within the Printing segment. HP reflected this change to its business unit information in prior reporting periods on an as-if basis. The reporting change had no impact to previously reported segment net revenue, consolidated net revenue, earnings from operations, net earnings or net EPS.
Contents
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)
Segment Operating Results from Operations and the reconciliation to HP consolidated results were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Net revenue: | | | | | |
| Notebooks | $ | 25,766 | | | $ | 22,928 | | | $ | 22,547 | |
| Desktops | 9,806 | | | 12,046 | | | 11,567 | |
| Workstations | 1,816 | | | 2,389 | | | 2,246 | |
| Other | 1,609 | | | 1,331 | | | 1,301 | |
| Personal Systems | 38,997 | | | 38,694 | | | 37,661 | |
| Supplies | 11,586 | | | 12,921 | | | 13,575 | |
| Commercial Hardware | 3,539 | | | 4,612 | | | 4,514 | |
| Consumer Hardware | 2,516 | | | 2,533 | | | 2,716 | |
| Printing | 17,641 | | | 20,066 | | | 20,805 | |
| Corporate Investments | 2 | | | 2 | | | 5 | |
| Total segment net revenue | 56,640 | | | 58,762 | | | 58,471 | |
| Other | (1) | | | (6) | | | 1 | |
| Total net revenue | $ | 56,639 | | | $ | 58,756 | | | $ | 58,472 | |
| | | | | |
| Earnings before taxes: | | | | | |
| Personal Systems | $ | 2,312 | | | $ | 1,898 | | | $ | 1,402 | |
| Printing | 2,495 | | | 3,202 | | | 3,314 | |
| Corporate Investments | (69) | | | (96) | | | (82) | |
| Total segment earnings from operations | $ | 4,738 | | | $ | 5,004 | | | $ | 4,634 | |
| Corporate and unallocated costs and other | (407) | | | (404) | | | (200) | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | (278) | | | (297) | | | (268) | |
| Restructuring and other charges | (462) | | | (275) | | | (132) | |
| Acquisition-related charges | (16) | | | (35) | | | (123) | |
| Amortization of intangible assets | (113) | | | (116) | | | (80) | |
| | | | | |
| Interest and other, net | (231) | | | (1,354) | | | (818) | |
| Total earnings before taxes | $ | 3,231 | | | $ | 2,523 | | | $ | 3,013 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | | In millions | | |
| Net revenue: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Notebooks | $ | 22,928 |
| | $ | 22,547 |
| | $ | 19,782 |
|
| Desktops | 12,046 |
| | 11,567 |
| | 10,298 |
|
| Workstations | 2,389 |
| | 2,246 |
| | 2,042 |
|
| Other | 1,331 |
| | 1,301 |
| | 1,199 |
|
| Personal Systems | 38,694 |
| | 37,661 |
| | 33,321 |
|
| Supplies | 12,921 |
| | 13,575 |
| | 12,524 |
|
| Commercial Hardware | 4,612 |
| | 4,514 |
| | 3,792 |
|
| Consumer Hardware | 2,533 |
| | 2,716 |
| | 2,412 |
|
| Printing | 20,066 |
| | 20,805 |
| | 18,728 |
|
| Corporate Investments | 2 |
| | 5 |
| | 8 |
|
| Total segment net revenue | 58,762 |
| | 58,471 |
| | 52,057 |
|
| Other | (6 | ) | | 1 |
| | (1 | ) |
| Total net revenue | $ | 58,756 |
| | $ | 58,472 |
| | $ | 52,056 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Earnings before taxes: | | | |
| | |
|
| Personal Systems | $ | 1,898 |
| | $ | 1,402 |
| | $ | 1,206 |
|
| Printing | 3,202 |
| | 3,314 |
| | 3,142 |
|
| Corporate Investments | (96 | ) | | (82 | ) | | (87 | ) |
| Total segment earnings from operations | $ | 5,004 |
| | $ | 4,634 |
| | $ | 4,261 |
|
| Corporate and unallocated costs and other | (404 | ) | | (200 | ) | | (181 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation expense | (297 | ) | | (268 | ) | | (224 | ) |
| Restructuring and other charges | (275 | ) | | (132 | ) | | (362 | ) |
| Acquisition-related charges | (35 | ) | | (123 | ) | | (125 | ) |
| Amortization of intangible assets | (116 | ) | | (80 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| Interest and other, net | (1,354 | ) | | (818 | ) | | (92 | ) |
| Total earnings before taxes | $ | 2,523 |
| | $ | 3,013 |
| | $ | 3,276 |
|
Segment Assets
HP allocates assets to its business segments based on the segments primarily benefiting from the assets. Total assets by segment and the reconciliation of segment assets to HP consolidated assets were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| Personal Systems | $ | 14,697 | | | $ | 14,092 | |
| Printing | 14,170 | | | 14,309 | |
| Corporate Investments | 3 | | | 4 | |
| Corporate and unallocated assets | 5,811 | | | 5,062 | |
| Total assets | $ | 34,681 | | | $ | 33,467 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Personal Systems | $ | 14,092 |
| | $ | 13,447 |
|
| Printing | 14,309 |
| | 13,706 |
|
| Corporate Investments | 4 |
| | 5 |
|
| Corporate and unallocated assets | 5,062 |
| | 7,464 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 33,467 |
| | $ | 34,622 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)
Major Customers
No single customer represented 10% or more of HP’s net revenue in any fiscal year presented.
Geographic Information
Net revenue by country is based upon the sales location that predominately represents the customer location. For each of the fiscal years of 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, other than the United States, no country represented more than 10% of HP net revenue.
Net revenue by country in which HP operates was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | In millions | | |
| United States | $ | 20,227 | | | $ | 20,605 | | | $ | 20,602 | |
| Other countries | 36,412 | | | 38,151 | | | 37,870 | |
| Total net revenue | $ | 56,639 | | | $ | 58,756 | | | $ | 58,472 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | | In millions | | |
| United States | $ | 20,605 |
| | $ | 20,602 |
| | $ | 19,321 |
|
| Other countries | 38,151 |
| | 37,870 |
| | 32,735 |
|
| Total net revenue | $ | 58,756 |
| | $ | 58,472 |
| | $ | 52,056 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment by country in which HP operates was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| United States | $ | 1,260 |
| | $ | 935 |
|
| Singapore | 372 |
| | 371 |
|
| Other countries | 1,162 |
| | 892 |
|
| Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 2,794 |
| | $ | 2,198 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| United States | $ | 1,262 | | | $ | 1,260 | |
| Singapore | 326 | | | 372 | |
| Other countries | 1,039 | | | 1,162 | |
| Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 2,627 | | | $ | 2,794 | |
No single country other than those represented above exceeds 10% or more of HP’s total net property, plant and equipment in any fiscal year presented.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 3: Restructuring and Other Charges
Summary of Restructuring Plans
HP’s restructuring activities in fiscal years 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 summarized by plan were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2020 Plan | | Other prior year plans (1) | Total |
| Severance and EER | | Non-labor | |
| In millions |
| Accrued balance as of October 31, 2017 | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 108 | | | $ | 108 | |
| Charges | 0 | | | 0 | | | 99 | | | 99 | |
| Cash payments | 0 | | | 0 | | | (175) | | | (175) | |
| Non-cash and other adjustments | 0 | | | 0 | | | 27 | | | 27 | |
| Accrued balance as of October 31, 2018 | 0 | | | 0 | | | 59 | | | 59 | |
| Charges | 82 | | | 0 | | | 165 | | | 247 | |
| Cash payments | 0 | | | 0 | | | (140) | | | (140) | |
| Non-cash and other adjustments | (6) | | | 0 | | | (18) | | | (24) | |
| Accrued balance as of October 31, 2019 | 76 | | | 0 | | | 66 | | | 142 | |
| Charges | 346 | | | 10 | | | 1 | | | 357 | |
| Cash payments | (319) | | | (10) | | | (52) | | | (381) | |
| Non-cash and other adjustments | (48) | | (2) | 0 | | | (3) | | | (51) | |
| Accrued balance as of October 31, 2020 | $ | 55 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 67 | |
| Total costs incurred to date as of October 31, 2020 | $ | 428 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 1,817 | | | $ | 2,255 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Reflected in Consolidated Balance Sheets: | | | | | | | |
| Other current liabilities | $ | 55 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 67 | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2020 Plan | | Fiscal 2017 Plan | | Other prior year plans (2) | Total |
| | Severance and EER | | Infrastructure and other | | Severance | | Infrastructure and other (1) | |
| | In millions |
| Accrued balance as of October 31, 2016 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 34 |
| | $ | 58 |
|
| Charges | — |
| | — |
| | 117 |
| | 94 |
| | 16 |
| | 227 |
|
| Cash payments | — |
| | — |
| | (68 | ) | | (23 | ) | | (43 | ) | | (134 | ) |
| Non-cash and other adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | (52 | ) | | 6 |
| | (43 | ) |
| Accrued balance as of October 31, 2017 | — |
| | — |
| | 76 |
| | 19 |
| | 13 |
| | 108 |
|
| Charges (reversals) | — |
| | — |
| | 112 |
| | (13 | ) | | — |
| | 99 |
|
| Cash payments | — |
| | — |
| | (136 | ) | | (35 | ) | | (4 | ) | | (175 | ) |
| Non-cash and other adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | 29 |
| | — |
| | 27 |
|
| Accrued balance as of October 31, 2018 | — |
| | — |
| | 50 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | 59 |
|
| Charges | 82 |
| | — |
| | 137 |
| | 28 |
| | — |
| | 247 |
|
| Cash payments | — |
| | — |
| | (122 | ) | | (15 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (140 | ) |
| Non-cash and other adjustments | (6 | ) | (3 | ) | — |
| | (7 | ) | | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (24 | ) |
| Accrued balance as of October 31, 2019 | $ | 76 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 142 |
|
| Total costs incurred to date as of October 31, 2019 | $ | 82 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 390 |
| | $ | 109 |
| | $ | 1,317 |
| | $ | 1,898 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reflected in Consolidated Balance Sheets: |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Other current liabilities | $ | 76 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 141 |
|
| Other non-current liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
|
| |
(1)(2) Includes reclassification of liability related to the Enhanced Early Retirement (“EER”) plan of $44 million for certain healthcare and medical savings account benefits to pension and other post retirement plans. See Note 4 “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans” for further information. | Infrastructure and other includes adjustment of carrying amount of held for sale assets of $52 million in fiscal year 2017 and reversal of adjustments of $29 million for the fiscal year 2018 associated with the consolidation of manufacturing into global hubs. |
| |
(2)
| Includes prior-year plans which are substantially complete. HP does not expect any further material activity associated with these plans. |
| |
(3)
| Includes reclassification of liability related to the Enhanced Early Retirement (“EER”) plan of $6M for certain healthcare and medical savings account benefits to pension and other post retirement plans. See Note 4 “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans” for further information. |
Fiscal 2020 Plan
On September 30, 2019, HP’s Board of Directors approved the Fiscal 2020 Plan intended to optimize and simplify its operating model and cost structure that HP expects will be implemented through fiscal 2022. HP expects to reduce global headcount by approximately 7,000 to 9,000 employees through a combination of employee exits and voluntary EER. HP estimates that it will incur pre-tax charges of approximately $1.0 billion relating to labor and non-labor actions. HP expects to incur approximately $0.9 billion primarily in labor costs related to workforce reductions and the remaining costs will relate to infrastructure, non-labor actions and other charges.
Fiscal 2017 PlanOther charges
On October 10, 2016, HP’s BoardOther charges include non-recurring costs, including those as a result of Directors approved the Fiscal 2017 Plan, which included severanceSeparation, information technology rationalization efforts and proxy contest activities, and are distinct from ongoing operational costs. These costs relatedprimarily relate to labor actions and infrastructure costs related to non-labor actionsthird-party legal, professional services and other charges. Approximately 5,300 employees exited as part of the Fiscal 2017 Plan.non-recurring costs. HP incurred $390$105 million, $28 million and $33 million of other charges in severance costsfiscal year 2020, 2019 and $305 million in infrastructure costs related to non-labor and other charges. The Fiscal 2017 Plan is substantially complete. HP does not expect any further costs associated with the plan.2018, respectively.
Other charges
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 3: Restructuring and Other Charges (Continued)
Other charges include non-recurring costs, including those as a result of the Separation or information technology rationalization efforts, and are distinct from ongoing operational costs. These costs primarily relate to information technology costs such as advisory, consulting and non-recurring labor costs. HP incurred $28 million, $33 million and $135 million of other charges in fiscal year 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plans
HP sponsors a number of defined benefit pension plans worldwide. The most significant defined benefit plan, the HP Inc. Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”) is a frozen plan in the United States.
HP reduces the benefit payable to certain U.S. employees under the Pension Plan for service before 1993, if any, by any amounts due to the employee under HP’s frozen defined contribution Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan (“DPSP”). At October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the fair value of plan assets of the DPSP was $543$463 million and $536$543 million, respectively. The DPSP obligations are equal to the plan assets and are recognized as an offset to the Pension Plan when HP calculates its defined benefit pension cost and obligations. The Pension Plan and the DPSP both remain entirely with HP post-Separation.
Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
HP sponsors retiree health and welfare benefit plans, of which the most significant are in the United States. Under the HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan, certain pre-2003 retirees and grandfathered participants with continuous service to HP since 2002 are eligible to receive partially-subsidizedpartially subsidized medical coverage based on years of service at retirement. HP’s share of the premium cost is capped for all subsidized medical coverage provided under the HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan. HP currently leverages the employer group waiver plan process to provide HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan post-65 prescription drug coverage under Medicare Part D, thereby giving HP access to federal subsidies to help pay for retiree benefits.
Certain employees not grandfathered for partially subsidized medical coverage under the above programs, and employees hired after 2002 but before August 2008, are eligible for credits under the HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan. Credits offered after September 2008 are provided in the form of matching credits on employee contributions made to a voluntary employee beneficiary association upon attaining age 45 or as part of early retirement programs. On retirement, former employees may use these credits for the reimbursement of certain eligible medical expenses, including premiums required for coverage.
Defined Contribution Plans
HP offers various defined contribution plans for U.S. and non-U.S. employees. Total defined contribution expense was $108 million in fiscal year 2020, $107 million in fiscal year 2019 and $110 million in fiscal year 2018 and $103 million in fiscal year 2017.2018.
U.S. employees are automatically enrolled in the HP Inc. 401(k) Plan when they meet eligibility requirements, unless they decline participation. The employer matching contributions in the HP Inc. 401(k) Plan is 100% of an employee’s contributions, up to a maximum ofthe first 4% of eligible compensation.compensation contributed by employees, and the employer match is vested after three years of employee service. Generally, an employee must be employed by HP Inc. on the last day of the calendar year to receive a match.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Expense
The components of HP’s pension and post-retirement (credit) benefit cost recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings were as follows:
| | | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans | | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions | | In millions |
| Service cost | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 57 |
| | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 48 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
| Service cost | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 64 | | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 55 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | |
| Interest cost | 491 |
| | 452 |
| | 469 |
| | 24 |
| | 24 |
| | 18 |
| | 17 |
| | 15 |
| | 18 |
| Interest cost | 412 | | | 491 | | | 452 | | | 17 | | | 24 | | | 24 | | | 11 | | | 17 | | | 15 | |
| Expected return on plan assets | (581 | ) | | (717 | ) | | (677 | ) | | (37 | ) | | (39 | ) | | (31 | ) | | (22 | ) | | (23 | ) | | (26 | ) | Expected return on plan assets | (700) | | | (581) | | | (717) | | | (43) | | | (37) | | | (39) | | | (23) | | | (22) | | | (23) | |
| Amortization and deferrals: | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| Amortization and deferrals: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Actuarial loss (gain) | 59 |
| | 58 |
| | 73 |
| | 31 |
| | 28 |
| | 40 |
| | (31 | ) | | (17 | ) | | (17 | ) | Actuarial loss (gain) | 64 | | | 59 | | | 58 | | | 43 | | | 31 | | | 28 | | | (10) | | | (31) | | | (17) | |
| Prior service benefit | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (13 | ) | | (18 | ) | | (19 | ) | Prior service benefit | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (2) | | | (3) | | | (3) | | | (12) | | | (13) | | | (18) | |
| Net periodic (credit) benefit cost | (31 | ) | | (207 | ) | | (135 | ) | | 72 |
| | 65 |
| | 72 |
| | (48 | ) | | (42 | ) | | (43 | ) | Net periodic (credit) benefit cost | (224) | | | (31) | | | (207) | | | 79 | | | 72 | | | 65 | | | (33) | | | (48) | | | (42) | |
| Curtailment gain | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (22 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Curtailment gain | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (22) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Settlement loss | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 3 |
| | 1 |
| | 5 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Settlement loss | 217 | | | 2 | | | 2 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Special termination benefits | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Special termination benefit cost | | Special termination benefit cost | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 44 | | | 6 | | | 0 | |
| Total (credit) benefit cost | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (205 | ) | | $ | (132 | ) | | $ | 51 |
| | $ | 70 |
| | $ | 74 |
| | $ | (42 | ) | | $ | (42 | ) | | $ | (43 | ) | Total (credit) benefit cost | $ | (7) | | | $ | (29) | | | $ | (205) | | | $ | 80 | | | $ | 51 | | | $ | 70 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | (42) | | | $ | (42) | |
The components of net periodic benefit costs other than the service cost component are included in Interest and other, net in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
The weighted-average assumptions used to calculate the total periodic (credit) benefit (credit) cost were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| Discount rate | 4.5 | % | | 3.8 | % | | 4.0 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 2.1 | % | | 1.6 | % | | 4.4 | % | | 3.5 | % | | 3.4 | % |
| Expected increase in compensation levels | 2.0 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.7 | % | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Expected long-term return on plan assets | 6.0 | % | | 6.9 | % | | 6.9 | % | | 4.4 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.4 | % | | 6.0 | % | | 7.1 | % | | 7.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| Discount rate | 3.2 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 3.8 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 2.1 | % | | 2.9 | % | | 4.4 | % | | 3.5 | % |
| Expected increase in compensation levels | 2.0 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 0 | % | | 0 | % | | 0 | % |
| Expected long-term return on plan assets | 6.0 | % | | 6.0 | % | | 6.9 | % | | 4.4 | % | | 4.4 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 5.9 | % | | 6.0 | % | | 7.1 | % |
Funded Status
The funded status of the defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans was as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
| | | | As of October 31 | | As of October 31 | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 | |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans | | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans | |
| | In millions | | In millions | |
| Change in fair value of plan assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Change in fair value of plan assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of assets — beginning of year | $ | 10,018 |
| | $ | 10,838 |
| | $ | 850 |
| | $ | 815 |
| | $ | 388 |
| | $ | 351 |
| Fair value of assets — beginning of year | $ | 12,017 | | | $ | 10,018 | | | $ | 969 | | | $ | 850 | | | $ | 404 | | | $ | 388 | | |
| Acquisition/ deletion of plan | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 40 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Acquisition/ deletion of plan | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (1) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Actual return on plan assets | 2,499 |
| | (267 | ) | | 85 |
| | (2 | ) | | 44 |
| | 76 |
| Actual return on plan assets | 1,260 | | | 2,499 | | | 22 | | | 85 | | | 107 | | | 44 | | |
| Employer contributions | 32 |
| | 33 |
| | 44 |
| | 33 |
| | 5 |
| | 4 |
| Employer contributions | 34 | | | 32 | | | 45 | | | 44 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | |
| Participant contributions | — |
| | — |
| | 17 |
| | 11 |
| | 36 |
| | 59 |
| Participant contributions | 0 | | | 0 | | | 18 | | | 17 | | | 45 | | | 36 | | |
| Benefits paid | (523 | ) | | (575 | ) | | (28 | ) | | (10 | ) | | (69 | ) | | (102 | ) | Benefits paid | (422) | | | (523) | | | (33) | | | (28) | | | (79) | | | (69) | | |
| Settlement | (9 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (4 | ) | | (18 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| Settlement | (2,426) | | | (9) | | | (7) | | | (4) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Currency impact | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (19 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| Currency impact | 0 | | | 0 | | | 50 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Transfers | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Transfers | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Fair value of assets — end of year | $ | 12,017 |
| | $ | 10,018 |
| | $ | 969 |
| | $ | 850 |
| | $ | 404 |
| | $ | 388 |
| Fair value of assets — end of year | $ | 10,463 | | | $ | 12,017 | | | $ | 1,064 | | | $ | 969 | | | $ | 481 | | | $ | 404 | | |
| Change in benefits obligation | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Change in benefits obligation | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Projected benefit obligation — beginning of year | $ | 11,167 |
| | $ | 12,266 |
| | $ | 1,227 |
| | $ | 1,132 |
| | $ | 397 |
| | $ | 463 |
| Projected benefit obligation — beginning of year | $ | 13,191 | | | $ | 11,167 | | | $ | 1,457 | | | $ | 1,227 | | | $ | 390 | | | $ | 397 | | |
| Acquisition/ deletion of plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Acquisition/ deletion of plan | 0 | | | 0 | | | 3 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Service cost | — |
| | — |
| | 57 |
| | 55 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| Service cost | 0 | | | 0 | | | 64 | | | 57 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | |
| Interest cost | 491 |
| | 452 |
| | 24 |
| | 24 |
| | 17 |
| | 15 |
| Interest cost | 412 | | | 491 | | | 17 | | | 24 | | | 11 | | | 17 | | |
| Participant contributions | — |
| | — |
| | 17 |
| | 11 |
| | 36 |
| | 59 |
| Participant contributions | 0 | | | 0 | | | 18 | | | 17 | | | 45 | | | 36 | | |
| Actuarial loss (gain) | 2,065 |
| | (965 | ) | | 219 |
| | 21 |
| | 35 |
| | (39 | ) | Actuarial loss (gain) | 589 | | | 2,065 | | | 78 | | | 219 | | | (10) | | | 35 | | |
| Benefits paid | (523 | ) | | (575 | ) | | (28 | ) | | (10 | ) | | (69 | ) | | (102 | ) | Benefits paid | (422) | | | (523) | | | (33) | | | (28) | | | (79) | | | (69) | | |
| Plan amendments | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | (33 | ) | | — |
| Plan amendments | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 4 | | | (8) | | | (33) | | |
| Curtailment | — |
| | — |
| | (63 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Curtailment | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (63) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Settlement | (9 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (4 | ) | | (13 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| Settlement | (2,426) | | | (9) | | | (7) | | | (4) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Special termination benefits | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| Special termination benefits | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 44 | | | 6 | | |
| Transfers | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Transfers | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Currency impact | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | (33 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| Currency impact | 0 | | | 0 | | | 67 | | | (3) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Projected benefit obligation — end of year | $ | 13,191 |
| | $ | 11,167 |
| | $ | 1,457 |
| | $ | 1,227 |
| | $ | 390 |
| | $ | 397 |
| Projected benefit obligation — end of year | $ | 11,344 | | | $ | 13,191 | | | $ | 1,664 | | | $ | 1,457 | | | $ | 394 | | | $ | 390 | | |
| Funded status at end of year | $ | (1,174 | ) | | $ | (1,149 | ) | | $ | (488 | ) | | $ | (377 | ) | | $ | 14 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | Funded status at end of year | $ | (881) | | | $ | (1,174) | | | $ | (600) | | | $ | (488) | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 14 | | |
| Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 13,191 |
| | $ | 11,167 |
| | $ | 1,320 |
| | $ | 1,099 |
| |
|
| |
|
| Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 11,344 | | | $ | 13,191 | | | $ | 1,515 | | | $ | 1,320 | | | | | | |
The weighted-average assumptions used to calculate the projected benefit obligations for the fiscal years ended October 31, 20192020 and 20182019 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| Discount rate | 3.2 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 2.9 | % | | 4.4 | % |
| Expected increase in compensation levels | 2.0 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 2.5 | % | | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| Discount rate | 2.8 | % | | 3.2 | % | | 1.1 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 2.3 | % | | 2.9 | % |
| Expected increase in compensation levels | 2.0 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 2.4 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 0 | % | | 0 | % |
The net amounts of non-current assets and current and non-current liabilities for HP’s defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans recognized on HP’s Consolidated Balance Sheet were as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Other non-current assets | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 14 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 11 |
|
| Other current liabilities | (36 | ) | | (32 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| Other non-current liabilities | (1,138 | ) | | (1,117 | ) | | (495 | ) | | (378 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (14 | ) |
| Funded status at end of year | $ | (1,174 | ) | | $ | (1,149 | ) | | $ | (488 | ) | | $ | (377 | ) | | $ | 14 |
| | $ | (9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Other non-current assets | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 20 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | 93 | | | $ | 21 | |
| Other current liabilities | (35) | | | (36) | | | (8) | | | (7) | | | (5) | | | (6) | |
| Other non-current liabilities | (846) | | | (1,138) | | | (612) | | | (495) | | | (1) | | | (1) | |
| Funded status at end of year | $ | (881) | | | $ | (1,174) | | | $ | (600) | | | $ | (488) | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 14 | |
The following table summarizes the pre-tax net actuarial loss (gain) and prior service benefit recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for the defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2020 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | $ | 1,119 | | | $ | 475 | | | $ | (220) | |
| Prior service benefit | 0 | | | (10) | | | (90) | |
| Total recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss (gain) | $ | 1,119 | | | $ | 465 | | | $ | (310) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2019 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | $ | 1,371 |
| | $ | 413 |
| | $ | (135 | ) |
| Prior service benefit | — |
| | (12 | ) | | (94 | ) |
| Total recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss (gain) | $ | 1,371 |
| | $ | 401 |
| | $ | (229 | ) |
The following table summarizes HP’s pre-tax net actuarial loss (gain) and prior service benefit that are expected to be amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss and recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) during the next fiscal year.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 42 |
| | $ | (10 | ) |
| Prior service benefit | — |
| | (2 | ) | | (12 | ) |
| Total expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost (credit) | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 40 |
| | $ | (22 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of October 31, 2020 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | $ | 59 | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | (17) | |
| Prior service benefit | 0 | | | (2) | | | (11) | |
| Total expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost (credit) | $ | 59 | | | $ | 52 | | | $ | (28) | |
Defined benefit plans with projected benefit obligations exceeding the fair value of plan assets were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Aggregate fair value of plan assets | $ | 12,017 |
| | $ | 10,018 |
| | $ | 905 |
| | $ | 800 |
|
| Aggregate projected benefit obligation | $ | 13,191 |
| | $ | 11,167 |
| | $ | 1,410 |
| | $ | 1,194 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Aggregate fair value of plan assets | $ | 10,463 | | | $ | 12,017 | | | $ | 998 | | | $ | 905 | |
| Aggregate projected benefit obligation | $ | 11,344 | | | $ | 13,191 | | | $ | 1,620 | | | $ | 1,410 | |
Defined benefit plans with accumulated benefit obligations exceeding the fair value of plan assets were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Aggregate fair value of plan assets | $ | 12,017 |
| | $ | 10,018 |
| | $ | 838 |
| | $ | 734 |
|
| Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 13,191 |
| | $ | 11,167 |
| | $ | 1,226 |
| | $ | 1,007 |
|
78
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans |
| | In millions |
| Aggregate fair value of plan assets | $ | 10,463 | | | $ | 12,017 | | | $ | 920 | | | $ | 838 | |
| Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 11,344 | | | $ | 13,191 | | | $ | 1,419 | | | $ | 1,226 | |
Fair Value of Plan Assets
The table below sets forth the fair value of plan assets by asset category within the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 2019.2020. Refer to Note 9, “Fair Value” for details on fair value hierarchy. Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the Net Asset Value (“NAV”) per share as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table provide a reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the total value of plan assets.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2020 |
| | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | In millions |
| Asset Category: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities(1) | $ | 283 | | | $ | 51 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 334 | | | $ | 7 | | | $ | 75 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 82 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | | | $ | 2 | |
Debt securities(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Corporate | 0 | | | 5,891 | | | 0 | | | 5,891 | | | 0 | | | 124 | | | 0 | | | 124 | | | 0 | | | 53 | | | 0 | | | 53 | |
| Government | 0 | | | 1,758 | | | 0 | | | 1,758 | | | 0 | | | 4 | | | 0 | | | 4 | | | 0 | | | 136 | | | 0 | | | 136 | |
| Real Estate Funds | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1 | | | 28 | | | 0 | | | 29 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Insurance Contracts | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 90 | | | 0 | | | 90 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investments Entities(3) | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Investment Funds(4) | 348 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 348 | | | 0 | | | 329 | | | 0 | | | 329 | | | 63 | | | | | 0 | | | 63 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents(5) | 11 | | | 61 | | | 0 | | | 72 | | | 25 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 25 | | | 0 | | | 1 | | | 0 | | | 1 | |
Other(6) | (466) | | | (19) | | | 0 | | | (485) | | | 1 | | | 19 | | | 0 | | | 20 | | | (16) | | | | | 0 | | | (16) | |
| Net plan assets subject to leveling | $ | 176 | | | $ | 7,742 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 7,918 | | | $ | 34 | | | $ | 676 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 710 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 191 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 239 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments using NAV as a Practical Expedient(7) | | | | | | | 2,545 | | | | | | | | | 354 | | | | | | | | | 242 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investments at Fair Value | | | | | | | $ | 10,463 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,064 | | | | | | | | | $ | 481 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2019 |
| | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans |
| Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans |
| Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Total |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Total |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Total |
| | In millions |
| Asset Category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Equity securities(1) | $ | 697 |
|
| $ | 58 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 755 |
|
| $ | 132 |
|
| $ | 8 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 140 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 1 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 1 |
|
Debt securities(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Corporate | — |
|
| 6,098 |
|
| — |
|
| 6,098 |
|
| — |
|
| 139 |
|
| — |
|
| 139 |
|
| — |
|
| 40 |
|
| — |
|
| 40 |
|
| Government | — |
|
| 2,979 |
|
| — |
|
| 2,979 |
|
| — |
|
| 19 |
|
| — |
|
| 19 |
|
| — |
|
| 61 |
|
| — |
|
| 61 |
|
| Real Estate Funds | — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
|
| 69 |
|
| — |
|
| 70 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Insurance Contracts | — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 78 |
|
| — |
|
| 78 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investments Entities(3) | — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 7 |
|
| — |
|
| 7 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Investment Funds(4) | 324 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 324 |
|
| — |
|
| 311 |
|
| — |
|
| 311 |
|
| 57 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 57 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents(5) | 4 |
|
| 62 |
|
| — |
|
| 66 |
|
| 18 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 18 |
|
| — |
|
| 2 |
|
| — |
|
| 2 |
|
Other(6) | (517 | ) |
| (488 | ) |
| — |
|
| (1,005 | ) |
| 1 |
|
| 16 |
|
| — |
|
| 17 |
|
| (16 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (16 | ) |
| Net plan assets subject to leveling | $ | 508 |
|
| $ | 8,709 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 9,217 |
|
| $ | 152 |
|
| $ | 647 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 799 |
|
| $ | 41 |
|
| $ | 104 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investments using NAV as a Practical Expedient: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
Alternative Investments(7) | | | | | | | 975 |
| | | | | | | | 21 |
| | | | | | | | 196 |
|
Common Contractual Funds(8) | | | | | | | — |
| | | | | | | | 111 |
| | | | | | | | — |
|
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investment Entities(3) | | | | | | | 1,155 |
| | | | | | | | — |
| | | | | | | | 54 |
|
Investment Funds(4) | | | | | | | 670 |
| | | | | | | | 38 |
| | | | | | | | 9 |
|
| Investments at Fair Value | | | | | | | $ | 12,017 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 969 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 404 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
The table below sets forth the fair value of plan assets by asset category within the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 2018.2019.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2019 |
| | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | In millions |
| Asset Category: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities(1) | $ | 697 | | | $ | 58 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 755 | | | $ | 132 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 140 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | |
Debt securities(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Corporate | 0 | | | 6,098 | | | 0 | | | 6,098 | | | 0 | | | 139 | | | 0 | | | 139 | | | 0 | | | 40 | | | 0 | | | 40 | |
| Government | 0 | | | 2,979 | | | 0 | | | 2,979 | | | 0 | | | 19 | | | 0 | | | 19 | | | 0 | | | 61 | | | 0 | | | 61 | |
| Real Estate Funds | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1 | | | 69 | | | 0 | | | 70 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Insurance Contracts | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 78 | | | 0 | | | 78 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12s(3) | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Investment Funds(4) | 324 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 324 | | | 0 | | | 311 | | | 0 | | | 311 | | | 57 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 57 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents(5) | 4 | | | 62 | | | 0 | | | 66 | | | 18 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 18 | | | 0 | | | 2 | | | 0 | | | 2 | |
Other(6) | (517) | | | (488) | | | 0 | | | (1,005) | | | 1 | | | 16 | | | 0 | | | 17 | | | (16) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (16) | |
| Net plan assets subject to leveling | $ | 508 | | | $ | 8,709 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 9,217 | | | $ | 152 | | | $ | 647 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 799 | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | 104 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 145 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments using NAV as a Practical Expedient(7) | | | | | | | 2,800 | | | | | | | | | 170 | | | | | | | | | 259 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investments at Fair Value | | | | | | | $ | 12,017 | | | | | | | | | $ | 969 | | | | | | | | | $ | 404 | |
Notes(1)Investments in publicly traded equity securities are valued using the closing price on the measurement date as reported on the stock exchange on which the individual securities are traded.
(2)The fair value of corporate, government and asset-backed debt securities is based on observable inputs of comparable market transactions. Also included in this category is debt issued by national, state and local governments and agencies.
(3)Department of Labor 103-12 IE (Investment Entity) designation is for plan assets held by two or more unrelated employee benefit plans which includes limited partnerships and venture capital partnerships. Certain common collective trusts and interests in 103-12 entities are valued using NAV as a practical expedient.
(4)Includes publicly traded funds of investment companies that are registered with the SEC, funds that are not publicly traded and a non-U.S. fund-of-fund arrangement. The non-U.S. fund-of-fund arrangement is a custom portfolio valued at NAV consisting primarily of fixed income and common contractual funds.
(5)Includes cash and cash equivalents such as short-term marketable securities. Cash and cash equivalents include money market funds, which are valued based on NAV. Other assets were classified in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input (e.g., quoted prices and observable inputs) that is significant to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)the fair value measure in its entirety.
Note 4: Retirement(6)Includes primarily reverse repurchase agreements, unsettled transactions, and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)derivative instruments.
(7)These investments include alternative investments, which primarily consist of private equities and hedge funds. The valuation of alternative investments, such as limited partnerships and joint ventures, may require significant management judgment. For alternative investments, valuation is based on NAV as reported by the asset manager or investment company and adjusted for cash flows, if necessary. In making such an assessment, a variety of factors are reviewed by management, including but not limited to the timeliness of NAV as reported by the asset manager and changes in general economic and market conditions subsequent to the last NAV reported by the asset manager.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2018 |
| | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
| Total |
| | In millions |
| Asset Category: |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Equity securities(1) | $ | 794 |
| | $ | 48 |
| | $ | — |
|
| $ | 842 |
| | $ | 114 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 120 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| $ | 1 |
|
Debt securities(2) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Corporate | — |
| | 4,941 |
| | — |
|
| 4,941 |
| | — |
| | 110 |
| | — |
| | 110 |
| | — |
| | 40 |
| | — |
|
| 40 |
|
| Government | — |
| | 1,637 |
| | — |
|
| 1,637 |
| | — |
| | 28 |
| | — |
| | 28 |
| | — |
| | 54 |
| | — |
|
| 54 |
|
| Real Estate Funds | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
| | 3 |
| | 60 |
| | — |
| | 63 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
|
| Insurance Contracts | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
| | — |
| | 50 |
| | — |
| | 50 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
|
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12s(3) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| — |
|
Investment Funds(4) | 253 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 253 |
| | — |
| | 279 |
| | — |
| | 279 |
| | 55 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 55 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents(5) | 5 |
| | 139 |
| | — |
|
| 144 |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
|
| 4 |
|
Other(6) | (108 | ) | | (233 | ) | | — |
|
| (341 | ) | | 2 |
| | 13 |
| | — |
| | 15 |
| | (13 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| (13 | ) |
| Net plan assets subject to leveling | $ | 944 |
| | $ | 6,532 |
| | $ | — |
|
| $ | 7,476 |
| | $ | 138 |
| | $ | 553 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 691 |
| | $ | 43 |
| | $ | 98 |
| | $ | — |
|
| $ | 141 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Investments using NAV as a Practical Expedient: |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
Alternative Investments(7) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 1,319 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 14 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 220 |
|
Common Contractual Funds(8) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 110 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| — |
|
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investment Entities(3) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 683 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | — |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 21 |
|
Investment Funds(4) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 540 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 35 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 6 |
|
| Investments at Fair Value |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| $ | 10,018 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | $ | 850 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| $ | 388 |
|
| |
•(1) | Investments in publicly-traded equity securities are valued using the closing price on the measurement date as reported on the stock exchange on which the individual securities are traded. |
| |
(2)
| The fair value of corporate, government and asset-backed debt securities is based on observable inputs of comparable market transactions. Also included in this category is debt issued by national, state and local governments and agencies. |
| |
(3)
| Department of Labor 103-12 IE (Investment Entity) designation is for plan assets held by two or more unrelated employee benefit plans which includes limited partnerships and venture capital partnerships. Certain common collective trusts and interests in 103-12 entities are valued using NAV as a practical expedient. |
| |
(4)
| Includes publicly traded funds of investment companies that are registered with the SEC, funds that are not publicly traded and a non-U.S. fund-of-fund arrangement. The non-U.S. fund-of-fund arrangement is a custom portfolio valued at NAV consisting primarily of fixed income and common contractual funds. |
| |
(5)
| Includes cash and cash equivalents such as short-term marketable securities. Cash and cash equivalents include money market funds, which are valued based on NAV. Other assets were classified in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input (e.g., quoted prices and observable inputs) that is significant to the fair value measure in its entirety. |
| |
(6)
| Includes primarily reverse repurchase agreements, unsettled transactions, and derivative instruments. |
| |
(7)
| Alternative Investments primarily include private equities and hedge funds. The valuation of alternative investments, such as limited partnerships and joint ventures, may require significant management judgment. For alternative investments, valuation is based on NAV as reported by the asset manager or investment company and adjusted for cash flows, if necessary. In making such an assessment, a variety of factors are reviewed by management, including but not limited to the timeliness of NAV as reported by the asset manager and changes in general economic and market conditions subsequent to the last NAV reported by the asset manager. |
Private equities include limited partnerships such as equity, buyout, venture capital, real estate and other similar funds that invest in the United States and internationally where foreign currencies are hedged.
•Hedge funds include limited partnerships that invest both long and short primarily in common stocks and credit, relative value, event-driven equity, distressed debt and macro strategies. Management of the hedge funds has the ability to shift investments from value to growth strategies, from small to large capitalization stocks and bonds, and from a net long position to a net short position.
In addition, these investments include the Common Contractual Fund, which is an investment arrangement in which
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
frominstitutional investors pool their assets. Units may be acquired in different sub-funds focused on equities, fixed income, alternative investments and emerging markets. Each sub-fund is invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective and units are issued in relation to each sub-fund. While the sub-funds are not publicly traded, the custodian strikes a net long position toNAV either once or twice a net short position.month, depending on the sub-fund. These assets are valued using NAV as a practical expedient. These investments also include Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investment Entities as defined in note (3) above and Investment Funds as defined in note (4) above.
| |
(8)
| The Common Contractual Fund is an investment arrangement in which institutional investors pool their assets. Units may be acquired in different sub-funds focused on equities, fixed income, alternative investments and emerging markets. Each sub-fund is invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective and units are issued in relation to each sub-fund. While the sub-funds are not publicly traded, the custodian strikes a NAV either once or twice a month, depending on the sub-fund. These assets are valued using NAV as a practical expedient. |
Plan Asset Allocations
Refer to the fair value hierarchy table above for actual assets allocations across the benefit plans. The weighted-average target asset allocations across the benefit plans represented in the fair value tables above were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 Target Allocation |
| Asset Category | | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| Equity-related investments | | 29.4 | % | | 40.6 | % | | 48.2 | % |
| Debt securities | | 70.6 | % | | 36.0 | % | | 36.1 | % |
| Real estate | | — |
| | 6.2 | % | | — |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | | — |
| | 2.4 | % | | 15.7 | % |
| Other | | — |
| | 14.8 | % | | — |
|
| Total | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 Target Allocation |
| Asset Category | | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| Equity-related investments | | 29.4 | % | | 35.4 | % | | 39.6 | % |
| Debt securities | | 70.6 | % | | 33.1 | % | | 48.4 | % |
| Real estate | | 0 | % | | 12.1 | % | | 0 | % |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | 0 | % | | 3.1 | % | | 12.0 | % |
| Other | | 0 | % | | 16.3 | % | | 0 | % |
| Total | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Investment Policy
HP’s investment strategy is to seek a competitive rate of return relative to an appropriate level of risk depending on the funded status of each plan and the timing of expected benefit payments. The majority of the plans’ investment managers employ active investment management strategies with the goal of outperforming the broad markets in which they invest. Risk management practices include diversification across asset classes and investment styles and periodic rebalancing toward asset allocation targets. A number of the plans’ investment managers are authorized to utilize derivatives for investment or liability exposures, and HP may utilize derivatives to affect asset allocation changes or to hedge certain investment or liability exposures.
The target asset allocation selected for each U.S. plan (pension and post-retirement) reflects a risk/return profile HP believes is appropriate relative to each plan’s liability structure and return goals. HP conducts periodic asset-liability studies for U.S. plans to model various potential asset allocations in comparison to each plan’s forecasted liabilities and liquidity needs and to develop a policy glide path which adjusts the asset allocation with funded status. A 20182021 asset-liability study reconfirmedis planned to reconfirm the current policy glide path for the U.S. pension plan.Pension Plan. Due to higher interest rates at the beginningstrong funded status for the U.S. Pension Plan and the high level of fiscal year 2019,liability hedging in the investment portfolio interest rate exposure was increasedpension assets, no material changes are anticipated other than additional movement to fixed-income investments in accordancethe 401(h) account with the policy hedge path.U.S. Pension Plan. HP invests a portion of the U.S. defined benefit plan assets and post-retirement benefit plan assets in private market securities such as private equity funds to provide diversification and a higher expected return on assets.
Outside the United States, asset allocation decisions are typically made by an independent board of trustees for the specific plan. As in the United States, investment objectives are designed to generate returns that will enable the plan to meet its future obligations. In some countries, local regulations may restrict asset allocations, typically leading to a higher percentage of investment in fixed incomefixed-income securities than would otherwise be deployed. HP reviews the investment strategy and provides a recommended listwhere appropriate, can offer some assistance in the selection of investment managers, for each country plan, with final decisions on asset allocation and investment managers made by the board of trustees for the specific plan.
Basis for Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Plan Assets
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets reflects the expected returns for each major asset class in which the plan invests and the weight of each asset class in the target mix. Expected asset returns reflect the current yield on government bonds, risk premiums for each asset class and expected real returns which considers each country’s specific inflation outlook. Because HP’s investment policy is to employ primarily active investment managers who seek to outperform the broader market, the expected returns are adjusted to reflect the expected additional returns net of fees.
Retirement Incentive ProgramHP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
As part of the Fiscal 2020 Plan, HP announced the voluntary EER program for its U.S. employees in October 2019. Voluntary participation in the EER program was limited to those employees who arewere at least 50 years old with 20 or more years of service at HP. Employees accepted into the EER program will leaveleft HP on dates ranging from December 31, 2019 to September 30, 2020. The EER benefit will bewas a cash lump sum payment which iswas calculated based on years of service at HP at the time of the retirement and ranging from 13 to 52 weeks of pay.
All employees participating in the EER program arewere offered the opportunity to continue health care coverage at the active employee contribution rates for up to 36 months following retirement. In addition, HP is providingprovided up to $12,000 in employer credits under the Retirement Medical Savings Account (“RMSA”) program. In relation to the continued health care coverage and employer credits under the RMSA program, HP will recognize arecognized special termination benefits expensebenefit costs of $44 million as restructuring and other charges.charges for the twelve months ended October 31, 2020.
Lump Sum Program
HP offered a lump sum program during the third quarter of fiscal year 2020. Certain terminated vested participants in the HP Inc. Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”) could elect to take a one-time voluntary lump sum payment equal to the present value of future benefits. Approximately 12,000 participants elected the lump sum option. Payments of $2.2 billion were made from plan assets to the participants in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020. A non-cash settlement expense of $214 million arising from the accelerated recognition of previously deferred actuarial losses was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020.
Future Contributions and Funding Policy
In fiscal year 2020,2021, HP expects to contribute approximately $76$77 million to its non-U.S. pension plans, $36$34 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified plan participants and $6$5 million to cover benefit claims for HP’s post-retirement benefit plans. HP’s policy is to fund its pension plans so that it makes at least the minimum contribution required by local government, funding and taxing authorities.
Estimated Future Benefits Payments
As of October 31, 2019,2020, HP estimates that the future benefits payments for the retirement and post-retirement plans are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal year | | U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S.
Defined
Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans |
| | | In millions |
| 2021 | | $ | 680 | | | $ | 43 | | | $ | 47 | |
| 2022 | | 680 | | | 41 | | | 44 | |
| 2023 | | 682 | | | 45 | | | 33 | |
| 2024 | | 690 | | | 50 | | | 27 | |
| 2025 | | 699 | | | 55 | | | 27 | |
| Next five fiscal years to October 31, 2030 | | 3,306 | | | 323 | | | 131 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal year | | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | | In millions |
| 2020 | | $ | 730 |
| | $ | 40 |
| | $ | 40 |
|
| 2021 | | 752 |
| | 34 |
| | 36 |
|
| 2022 | | 769 |
| | 39 |
| | 32 |
|
| 2023 | | 788 |
| | 40 |
| | 29 |
|
| 2024 | | 809 |
| | 45 |
| | 28 |
|
| Next five fiscal years to October 31, 2029 | | 4,020 |
| | 276 |
| | 135 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation
HP’s stock-based compensation plans include incentive compensation plans and an employee stock purchase plan.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Related Income Tax Benefits for Operations
Stock-based compensation expense and the resulting tax benefits for operations were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
| Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 297 |
| | $ | 268 |
| | $ | 224 |
|
| Income tax benefit | (47 | ) | | (59 | ) | | (71 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax | $ | 250 |
| | $ | 209 |
| | $ | 153 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 278 | | | $ | 297 | | | $ | 268 | |
| Income tax benefit | (48) | | | (47) | | | (59) | |
| Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax | $ | 230 | | | $ | 250 | | | $ | 209 | |
Cash received from option exercises and purchases under the HP Inc. 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2011 ESPP”) was $56 million in fiscal year 2020, $59 million in fiscal year 2019 and $158 million in fiscal year 2018 and $118 million in fiscal year 2017.2018. The benefit realized for the tax deduction from option exercises in fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018 and 2017 was $2 million, $3 million and $23 million, and $15 million, respectively.
Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans
HP’s stock-based incentive compensation plans include equity plans adopted in 2004 and 2000, as amended and restated (“principal equity plans”), as well as various equity plans assumed through acquisitions under which stock-based awards are outstanding. Stock-based awards granted under the principal equity plans include restricted stock awards, stock options and performance-based awards. Employees meeting certain employment qualifications are eligible to receive stock-based awards. The aggregate number of shares of HP’s stock authorized for issuance under the 2004 principal equity plan is 593.1 million.million. No further grants may be made under the 2000 principal equity plan and all outstanding awards under this plan will remain outstanding according to the terms of the plan.
Restricted stock awards are non-vested stock awards that may include grants of restricted stock or restricted stock units. Restricted stock awards and cash-settled awards are generally subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to the lapse of the restrictions. Such awards generally vest one to three years from the date of grant. During the vesting period, ownership of the restricted stock cannot be transferred. Restricted stock has the same dividend and voting rights as common stock and is considered to be issued and outstanding upon grant. The dividends paid on restricted stock are non-forfeitable. Restricted stock units do not have the voting rights of common stock, and the shares underlying restricted stock units are not considered issued and outstanding upon grant. However, shares underlying restricted stock units are included in the calculation of diluted net EPS. Restricted stock units have forfeitable dividend equivalent rights equal to the dividend paid on common stock. HP expenses the fair value of restricted stock awards ratably over the period during which the restrictions lapse. The majority of restricted stock units issued by HP contain only service vesting conditions. However, starting in fiscal year 2014, HP began grantingalso grants performance-adjusted restricted stock units thatwhich vest only on the satisfaction of both service and the achievement of certain performance goals including market conditions prior to the expiration of the awards.
Stock options granted under the principal equity plans are generally non-qualified stock options, but the principal equity plans permit some options granted to qualify as incentive stock options under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Stock options generally vest over three to four years from the date of grant. The exercise price of a stock option is equal to the closing price of HP’s stock on the option grant date. The majority of stock options issued by HP contain only service vesting conditions. However, startingStarting in fiscal year 2011 through fiscal year 2016, HP granted performance-contingent stock options that vest only on the satisfaction of both service and market conditions prior to the expiration of the awards.
RSU and stock option grants provide for accelerated vesting in certain circumstances as defined in the plans and related grant agreements, including termination in connection with a change in control.
Restricted Stock Units
HP uses the closing stock price on the grant date to estimate the fair value of service-based restricted stock units. HP estimates the fair value of restricted stock units subject to performance-adjusted vesting conditions using a combination of the closing stock price on the grant date and the Monte Carlo simulation model. The weighted-average fair value and the assumptions used to measure the fair value of restricted stock units subject to performance-adjusted vesting conditions in the Monte Carlo simulation model were as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Expected volatility(1) | 27.6 | % | | 26.5 | % | | 29.5 | % |
Risk-free interest rate(2) | 1.6 | % | | 2.7 | % | | 1.9 | % |
Expected performance period in years(3) | 2.9 | | 2.9 | | 2.9 |
(1)The expected volatility was estimated using the historical volatility derived from HP’s common stock. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Weighted-average fair value(1) | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 20 |
|
Expected volatility(2) | 26.5 | % | | 29.5 | % | | 30.5 | % |
Risk-free interest rate(3) | 2.7 | % | | 1.9 | % | | 1.4 | % |
Expected performance period in years(4) | 2.9 |
| | 2.9 |
| | 2.9 |
|
| |
(1)(3)The expected performance period was estimated based on the length of the remaining performance period from the grant date.
| The weighted-average fair value was based on performance-adjusted restricted stock units granted during the period. |
| |
(2)
| The expected volatility was estimated using the historical volatility derived from HP’s common stock. |
| |
(3)
| The risk-free interest rate was estimated based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues. |
| |
(4)
| The expected performance period was estimated based on the length of the remaining performance period from the grant date. |
A summary of restricted stock units activity is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share | | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share | | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share |
| | In thousands | | | | In thousands | | | | In thousands | | |
| Outstanding at beginning of year | 30,784 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | 31,822 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | 28,710 |
| | $ | 13 |
|
| Granted | 17,216 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | 16,364 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | 15,858 |
| | $ | 16 |
|
| Vested | (16,934 | ) | | $ | 16 |
| | (15,339 | ) | | $ | 15 |
| | (11,915 | ) | | $ | 14 |
|
| Forfeited | (1,106 | ) | | $ | 20 |
| | (2,063 | ) | | $ | 17 |
| | (831 | ) | | $ | 14 |
|
| Outstanding at end of year | 29,960 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | 30,784 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | 31,822 |
| | $ | 14 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share | | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share | | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share |
| | In thousands | | | | In thousands | | | | In thousands | | |
| Outstanding at beginning of year | 29,960 | | | $ | 21 | | | 30,784 | | | $ | 18 | | | 31,822 | | | $ | 14 | |
| Granted | 18,109 | | | $ | 20 | | | 17,216 | | | $ | 22 | | | 16,364 | | | $ | 21 | |
| Vested | (14,929) | | | $ | 20 | | | (16,934) | | | $ | 16 | | | (15,339) | | | $ | 15 | |
| Forfeited | (3,309) | | | $ | 21 | | | (1,106) | | | $ | 20 | | | (2,063) | | | $ | 17 | |
| Outstanding at end of year | 29,831 | | | $ | 21 | | | 29,960 | | | $ | 21 | | | 30,784 | | | $ | 18 | |
The total grant date fair value of restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018 and 2017 was $297 million, $273 million $224 million and $162$224 million, respectively. As of October 31, 2019,2020, total unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock units for operations was $267$266 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.4 years.
Stock Options
HP utilizes the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula to estimate the fair value of stock options subject to service-based vesting conditions. HP estimates the fair value of stock options subject to performance-contingent vesting conditions using a combination of a Monte Carlo simulation model and a lattice model as these awards contain market conditions. The weighted-average fair value and the assumptions used to measure fair value were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Weighted-average fair value(1) | $ | 3 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 5 | |
Expected volatility(2) | 29.8 | % | | 29.8 | % | | 29.4 | % |
Risk-free interest rate(3) | 1.6 | % | | 1.7 | % | | 2.5 | % |
Expected dividend yield(4) | 4.0 | % | | 3.7 | % | | 2.6 | % |
Expected term in years(5) | 6.0 | | 6.0 | | 5.0 |
(1)The weighted-average fair value was based on stock options granted during the period.
(2)Expected volatility was estimated based on a blended volatility (50% historical volatility and 50% implied volatility from traded options on HP's common stock).
(3)The risk-free interest rate was estimated based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues.
(4)The expected dividend yield represents a constant dividend yield applied for the duration of the expected term of the award.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Weighted-average fair value(1) | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 4 |
|
Expected volatility(2) | 29.8 | % | | 29.4 | % | | 28.0 | % |
Risk-free interest rate(3) | 1.7 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 1.9 | % |
Expected dividend yield(4) | 3.7 | % | | 2.6 | % | | 2.8 | % |
Expected term in years(5) | 6.0 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 5.5 |
|
| |
| The weighted-average fair value was based on stock options granted during the period. |
| |
(2)
| For all awards granted in fiscal year 2019 and 2018, expected volatility was estimated based on a blended volatility (50% historical volatility and 50% implied volatility from traded options on HP's common stock). For the awards granted in |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
fiscal year 2017,(5)For awards subject to service-based vesting, the expected volatilityterm was estimated using a simplified method; and for performance-contingent awards, the leverage-adjusted average ofexpected term represents an output from the term-matching volatilities of peer companies due to the lack of volume of forward traded options, which precluded the use of implied volatility.
| |
(3)lattice model.
| The risk-free interest rate was estimated based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues. |
| |
(4)
| The expected dividend yield represents a constant dividend yield applied for the duration of the expected term of the award. |
| |
(5)
| For awards subject to service-based vesting, the expected term was estimated using a simplified method; and for performance-contingent awards, the expected term represents an output from the lattice model. |
A summary of stock options activity is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value | | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value | | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value |
| | In
thousands | | | | In years | | In
millions | | In
thousands | | | | In years | | In
millions | | In
thousands | | | | In years | | In
millions |
| Outstanding at beginning of year | 7,086 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | | | |
| | 18,067 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | | | |
| | 28,218 |
| | $ | 12 |
| | | | |
|
| Granted | 2,451 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | | | |
| | 54 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | | | |
| | 104 |
| | $ | 19 |
| | | | |
|
| Exercised | (2,429 | ) | | $ | 13 |
| | | | |
| | (10,644 | ) | | $ | 13 |
| | | | |
| | (9,407 | ) | | $ | 11 |
| | | | |
|
| Forfeited/cancelled/expired | (15 | ) | | $ | 10 |
| | | | |
| | (391 | ) | | $ | 16 |
| | | | |
| | (848 | ) | | $ | 17 |
| | | | |
|
| Outstanding at end of year | 7,093 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | 5.7 | | $ | 15 |
| | 7,086 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | 4.2 | | $ | 73 |
| | 18,067 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | 4.2 | | $ | 152 |
|
| Vested and expected to vest | 7,093 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | 5.7 | | $ | 15 |
| | 7,084 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | 4.2 | | $ | 73 |
| | 17,692 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | 4.1 | | $ | 149 |
|
| Exercisable | 4,707 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | 3.6 | | $ | 15 |
| | 4,707 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | 3.7 | | $ | 49 |
| | 10,898 |
| | $ | 12 |
| | 3.1 | | $ | 102 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value | | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value | | Shares | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value |
| | In
thousands | | | | In years | | In
millions | | In
thousands | | | | In years | | In
millions | | In
thousands | | | | In years | | In
millions |
| Outstanding at beginning of year | 7,093 | | | $ | 16 | | | | | | | 7,086 | | | $ | 14 | | | | | | | 18,067 | | | $ | 13 | | | | | |
| Granted | 996 | | | $ | 18 | | | | | | | 2,451 | | | $ | 17 | | | | | | | 54 | | | $ | 21 | | | | | |
| Exercised | (2,213) | | | $ | 14 | | | | | | | (2,429) | | | $ | 13 | | | | | | | (10,644) | | | $ | 13 | | | | | |
| Forfeited/cancelled/expired | (239) | | | $ | 19 | | | | | | | (15) | | | $ | 10 | | | | | | | (391) | | | $ | 16 | | | | | |
| Outstanding at end of year | 5,637 | | | $ | 17 | | | 6.4 | | $ | 10 | | | 7,093 | | | $ | 16 | | | 5.7 | | $ | 15 | | | 7,086 | | | $ | 14 | | | 4.2 | | $ | 73 | |
| Vested and expected to vest | 5,637 | | | $ | 17 | | | 6.4 | | $ | 10 | | | 7,093 | | | $ | 16 | | | 5.7 | | $ | 15 | | | 7,084 | | | $ | 14 | | | 4.2 | | $ | 73 | |
| Exercisable | 3,196 | | | $ | 15 | | | 4.4 | | $ | 9 | | | 4,707 | | | $ | 14 | | | 3.6 | | $ | 15 | | | 4,707 | | | $ | 14 | | | 3.7 | | $ | 49 | |
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value that option holders would have realized had all option holders exercised their options on the last trading day of fiscal years 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017.2018. The aggregate intrinsic value is the difference between HP’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal year and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options. The total intrinsic value of options exercised in fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018 and 2017 was $12 million, $20 million $109 million and $77$109 million, respectively. The total grant date fair value of options vested in fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018 and 2017 was $3 million, $9 million $12 million and $19$12 million, respectively.
As of October 31, 2019,2020, total unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was $8$7 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of 21.5 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
HP sponsors the 2011 ESPP, pursuant to which eligible employees may contribute up to 10% of base compensation, subject to certain income limits, to purchase shares of HP’s common stock.
Pursuant to the terms of the 2011 ESPP, employees purchase stock under the 2011 ESPP at a price equal to 95% of HP’s closing stock price on the purchase date. NaN stock-based compensation expense was recorded in connection with those purchases because the criteria of a non-compensatory plan were met. The aggregate number of shares of HP’s stock authorized for issuance under the 2011 ESPP is 100 million. The 2021 ESPP comes into effect on May 1, 2021 upon expiry of the 2011 ESPP. The 2021 ESPP terms are similar to the current ESPP. The aggregate number of shares of HP’s stock authorized for issuance under the 2021 ESPP is 50 million.
Shares Reserved
Shares available for future grant and shares reserved for future issuance under the stock-based incentive compensation plans and the 2011 ESPP were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In thousands |
| Shares available for future grant | 229,334 | | | 265,135 | | | 305,767 | |
| Shares reserved for future issuance | 264,110 | | | 301,608 | | | 343,076 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In thousands |
| Shares available for future grant | 265,135 |
| | 305,767 |
| | 419,071 |
|
| Shares reserved for future issuance | 301,608 |
| | 343,076 |
| | 468,531 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings
Provision for Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was enacted into law. Given the significance of the legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), which allows registrants to record provisional amounts during a one year “measurement period”.
As of January 31, 2019, HP completed its accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA with no material changes to the provisional amounts recorded during the measurement period.
In January 2018, the FASB released guidance on the accounting for tax on the Global Minimum Tax provisions of TCJA. The Global Minimum Tax provisions impose a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. HP has elected to treat Global Minimum Tax inclusions as period costs.
The domestic and foreign components of earnings before taxes were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
| U.S. | $ | (1,021 | ) | | $ | 242 |
| | $ | (14 | ) |
| Non-U.S. | 3,544 |
| | 2,771 |
| | 3,290 |
|
| | $ | 2,523 |
| | $ | 3,013 |
| | $ | 3,276 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| U.S. | $ | 884 | | | $ | (1,021) | | | $ | 242 | |
| Non-U.S. | 2,347 | | | 3,544 | | | 2,771 | |
| | $ | 3,231 | | | $ | 2,523 | | | $ | 3,013 | |
The provision for (benefit from) provision for taxes on earnings was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
| U.S. federal taxes: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Current | $ | (987 | ) | | $ | 751 |
| | $ | 189 |
|
| Deferred | 149 |
| | (3,132 | ) | | 197 |
|
| Non-U.S. taxes: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Current | 386 |
| | 528 |
| | 302 |
|
| Deferred | (3 | ) | | (563 | ) | | 4 |
|
| State taxes: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Current | (160 | ) | | 61 |
| | 20 |
|
| Deferred | (14 | ) | | 41 |
| | 38 |
|
| | $ | (629 | ) | | $ | (2,314 | ) | | $ | 750 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| U.S. federal taxes: | | | | | |
| Current | $ | (24) | | | $ | (987) | | | $ | 751 | |
| Deferred | (68) | | | 149 | | | (3,132) | |
| Non-U.S. taxes: | | | | | |
| Current | 319 | | | 386 | | | 528 | |
| Deferred | 164 | | | (3) | | | (563) | |
| State taxes: | | | | | |
| Current | 23 | | | (160) | | | 61 | |
| Deferred | (27) | | | (14) | | | 41 | |
| | $ | 387 | | | $ | (629) | | | $ | (2,314) | |
As a result of U.S. tax reform, HP revised its estimated annual effective tax rate to reflect the change in the U.S. federal statutory tax rate from 35% to a transitional rate of 23.3% in fiscal year 2018, under transitional2018. The 2019 and 2020 U.S. federal statutory tax rate rules, andis 21% in fiscal year 2019.
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and HP’s effective tax rate were as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| U.S. federal statutory income tax rate from operations | 21.0 | % | | 23.3 | % | | 35.0 | % |
| State income taxes from operations, net of federal tax benefit | 1.5 | % | | 0.5 | % | | 1.4 | % |
| Impact of foreign earnings, net | (6.4 | )% | | (10.9 | )% | | (13.2 | )% |
| Foreign-derived intangible income deduction | (2.3 | )% | | — | % | | — | % |
| Global Minimum Tax | 4.3 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| U.S. Tax Reform impacts | (2.6 | )% | | (35.8 | )% | | — | % |
| Research and development (“R&D”) credit | (1.1 | )% | | (0.7 | )% | | (0.5 | )% |
| Valuation allowances | (3.7 | )% | | (9.3 | )% | | (1.9 | )% |
| Uncertain tax positions and audit settlements | (41.1 | )% | | (50.3 | )% | | 0.4 | % |
| Indemnification related items | 6.8 | % | | 5.2 | % | | (0.3 | )% |
| Other, net | (1.3 | )% | | 1.2 | % | | 2.0 | % |
| | (24.9 | )% | | (76.8 | )% | | 22.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| U.S. federal statutory income tax rate from operations | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 23.3 | % |
| State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit | 1.4 | % | | 1.5 | % | | 0.5 | % |
| Impact of foreign earnings including GILTI and FDII, net | (6.1) | % | | (4.4) | % | | (10.9) | % |
| U.S. Tax Reform enactment | 0 | % | | (2.6) | % | | (35.8) | % |
| Research and development (“R&D”) credit | (0.7) | % | | (1.1) | % | | (0.7) | % |
| Valuation allowances | 2.3 | % | | (3.7) | % | | (9.3) | % |
| Uncertain tax positions and audit settlements | (4.1) | % | | (41.1) | % | | (50.3) | % |
| Indemnification related items | 0 | % | | 6.8 | % | | 5.2 | % |
| Other, net | (1.8) | % | | (1.3) | % | | 1.2 | % |
| | 12.0 | % | | (24.9) | % | | (76.8) | % |
The jurisdictions with favorable tax rates that have the most significant effective tax rate impact in the periods presented include Puerto Rico, Singapore, China, Malaysia and Ireland.Malaysia. HP has elected to treat Global Minimum Tax inclusions as period costs.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
In fiscal year 2020, HP recorded $244 million of net income tax benefits related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. This amount includes tax benefits related to audit settlements of $124 million in various jurisdictions and $82 million related to restructuring benefits. Additionally, HP recorded benefits of $20 million related to proxy contest costs and $17 million of other net tax benefits. In fiscal year 2020, excess tax benefits associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units were immaterial.
In fiscal year 2019, HP recorded $1.3 billion of net income tax benefits related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. This amount includes tax benefits related to audit settlements of $1.0 billion, $75 million due to ability to utilize tax attributes, $57 million of restructuring benefits and net valuation allowance releases of $94 million. HP also recorded benefits of $78 million related to U.S. tax reform as a result of new guidance issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). These benefits were partially offset by uncertain tax position charges of $51 million. In fiscal year 2019, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, HP recorded excess tax benefits of $20 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units.
In fiscal year 2018, HP recorded $2.8 billion of net income tax benefits related to discrete items in the provision for taxes which include impacts of the TCJA. HP had not yet completed its analysis of the full impact of the TCJA. However, as of October 31, 2018, HP recorded a provisional tax benefit of $760 million related to $5.6 billion net benefit for the decrease in its deferred tax liability on unremitted foreign earnings, partially offset by $3.3 billion net expense for the deemed repatriation tax payable in installments over eight years, a $1.2 billion net expense for the remeasurement of its deferred assets and liabilities to the new U.S. statutory tax rate and a $317 million valuation allowance on net expense related to deferred tax assets that are expected to be realized at a lower rate. HP also recorded tax benefits related to audit settlements of $1.5 billion and valuation allowance releases of $601 million pertaining to a change in our ability to utilize certain foreign and U.S. deferred tax assets due to a change in our geographic earnings mix. These benefits were partially offset by other net tax charges of $34 million. In fiscal year 2018, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, HP recorded excess tax benefits of $42 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units.
In fiscal year 2017, HP recorded $72 million of net income tax benefits related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. These amounts primarily include tax benefits of $84 million related to restructuring and other charges, $12 million related to U.S. federal provision to return adjustments, $45 million related to Samsung acquisition-related charges, and $13 million of other net tax benefits. In addition, HP recorded tax charges of $11 million related to changes in state valuation allowances, $22 million of state provision to return adjustments, and $49 million related to uncertain tax positions. In fiscal year 2017, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, HP recorded excess tax benefits of $19 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units, which are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings as a component of the provision for income taxes.
As a result of certain employment actions and capital investments HP has undertaken, income from manufacturing and services in certain countries is subject to reduced tax rates, and in some cases is wholly exempt from taxes, through 2027.2029. The gross income tax benefits attributable to these actions and investments were estimated to be $386$344 million ($0.250.24 diluted EPS) in fiscal year 2020, $386 million ($0.25 diluted net EPS) in fiscal year 2019 and $578 million ($0.35 diluted net EPS) in fiscal year 2018 and $471 million ($0.28 diluted net EPS) in fiscal year 2017.2018.
Uncertain Tax Positions
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 7,771 |
| | $ | 10,808 |
| | $ | 10,858 |
|
| Increases: | | | |
| | |
|
| For current year’s tax positions | 79 |
| | 66 |
| | 52 |
|
| For prior years’ tax positions | 172 |
| | 101 |
| | 85 |
|
| Decreases: | | | |
| | |
|
| For prior years’ tax positions | (37 | ) | | (248 | ) | | (181 | ) |
| Statute of limitations expirations | (15 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| Settlements with taxing authorities | (7,041 | ) | | (2,953 | ) | | (5 | ) |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 929 |
| | $ | 7,771 |
| | $ | 10,808 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 929 | | | $ | 7,771 | | | $ | 10,808 | |
| Increases: | | | | | |
| For current year’s tax positions | 59 | | | 79 | | | 66 | |
| For prior years’ tax positions | 71 | | | 172 | | | 101 | |
| Decreases: | | | | | |
| For prior years’ tax positions | (89) | | | (37) | | | (248) | |
| Statute of limitations expirations | (2) | | | (15) | | | (3) | |
| Settlements with taxing authorities | (148) | | | (7,041) | | | (2,953) | |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 820 | | | $ | 929 | | | $ | 7,771 | |
As of October 31, 2020, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $820 million, of which up to $657 million would affect HP’s effective tax rate if realized. As of October 31, 2019, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $929 million of which up to $803 million would affect HP’s effective tax rate if realized. As of October 31, 2018, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $7.8 billion of which up to $1.5 billion would affect HP’s effective tax rate if realized. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $6.8 billion$109 million primarily related to the resolution of various audits. HP recognizes interest income from favorable settlements and interest expense and penalties accrued on unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for taxes in the Consolidated
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
Statements of Earnings. As of October 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, HP had accrued $34 million, $56 million $160 million and $257$160 million, respectively, for interest and penalties.
HP engages in continuous discussiondiscussions and negotiationnegotiations with taxing authorities regarding tax matters in various jurisdictions. While HP does not expectexpects to complete resolution of certain tax years with various tax authorities inwithin the next 12 months,months. HP believes it is reasonably possible that its existing gross unrecognized tax benefits may be reduced by an immaterial amountup to $107 million within the next 12 months. months, affecting HP’s effective tax rate if realized.
HP is subject to income tax in the United States and approximately 5860 other countries and is subject to routine corporate income tax audits in many of these jurisdictions. In addition, HP is subject to numerous ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. The IRS is conducting an audit of HP’s 20162018 and 2019 income tax return.returns.
With respect to major state and foreign tax jurisdictions, HP is no longer subject to tax authority examinations for years prior to 2002. No material tax deficiencies have been assessed in major state or foreign tax jurisdictions related to ongoing audits as of October 31, 2019.2020.
The U.S. Tax Court ruled in May 2012 against HP related to certain tax attributes claimed by HP for the tax years 1999 through 2003. HP appealed the U.S. Tax Court determination by filing a formal Notice of Appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. This case was argued before the Ninth Circuit in November 2016. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in November 2017 affirming the Tax Court determinations. In fiscal year 2018, HP decided against further appeal.
HP believes it has provided adequate reserves for all tax deficiencies or reductions in tax benefits that could result from federal, state and foreign tax audits. HP regularly assesses the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of HP’s tax provision. HP adjusts its uncertain tax positions to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular audit. However, income tax audits are inherently unpredictable and there can be no assurance that HP will accurately predict the outcome of these audits. The amounts ultimately paid on resolution of an audit could be materially different from the amounts previously included in the Provision for taxes and therefore the resolution of one or more of these uncertainties in any particular period could have a material impact on net income or cash flows.
HP has not provided for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on $5.7 billion of undistributed earnings from non-U.S. operations as of October 31, 20192020 because HP intends to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside of the United States. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable. The TCJA taxed HP’s historic earnings and profits of its non-U.S. subsidiaries. HP will remit these taxed reinvested earnings for which deferred U.S. federal and withholding taxes have been provided where excess cash has accumulated and HP determines that it is advantageous for business operations, tax or cash management reasons.
Deferred Income Taxes
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
The significant components of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Deferred Tax Assets | | | |
| Loss and credit carryforwards | $ | 7,856 |
| | $ | 8,204 |
|
| Intercompany transactions—excluding inventory | 714 |
| | 994 |
|
| Fixed assets | 115 |
| | 151 |
|
| Warranty | 195 |
| | 194 |
|
| Employee and retiree benefits | 396 |
| | 401 |
|
| Deferred Revenue | 145 |
| | 164 |
|
| Capitalized research and development | 193 |
| | — |
|
| Intangible assets | 420 |
| | — |
|
| Other | 556 |
| | 422 |
|
| Gross Deferred Tax Assets | 10,590 |
| | 10,530 |
|
| Valuation allowances | (7,930 | ) | | (7,906 | ) |
| Total Deferred Tax Assets | 2,660 |
| | 2,624 |
|
| | | | |
| Deferred Tax Liabilities | | | |
| Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries | (27 | ) | | (31 | ) |
| Intangible assets | — |
| | (229 | ) |
| Other | (73 | ) | | (33 | ) |
| Total Deferred Tax Liabilities | (100 | ) | | (293 | ) |
| Net Deferred Tax Assets | $ | 2,560 |
| | $ | 2,331 |
|
88
Deferred tax assets and liabilities included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Deferred tax assets | $ | 2,620 |
| | $ | 2,431 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities | (60 | ) | | (100 | ) |
| Total | $ | 2,560 |
| | $ | 2,331 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Gross NOLs | | Deferred Taxes on NOLs | | Valuation allowance | Initial Year of Expiration |
| | In millions | |
| Federal | $ | 372 |
| | $ | 78 |
| | $ | (19 | ) | 2023 |
| State | 2,634 |
| | 167 |
| | (62 | ) | 2019 |
| Foreign | 26,317 |
| | 7,434 |
| | (7,357 | ) | 2021 |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 29,323 |
| | $ | 7,679 |
| | $ | (7,438 | ) | |
As of October 31, 2019, HP had recorded deferred tax assets for various tax credit carryforwards as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | |
| Loss and credit carryforwards | $ | 7,857 | | | $ | 7,856 | |
| Intercompany transactions—excluding inventory | 509 | | | 714 | |
| Fixed assets | 120 | | | 115 | |
| Warranty | 203 | | | 195 | |
| Employee and retiree benefits | 411 | | | 396 | |
| Deferred revenue | 134 | | | 135 | |
| Capitalized research and development | 203 | | | 193 | |
| Intangible assets | 467 | | | 420 | |
| Operating lease liabilities | 218 | | | — | |
| Investment in partnership | 108 | | | 14 | |
| Other | 531 | | | 542 | |
| Gross deferred tax assets | 10,761 | | | 10,580 | |
| Valuation allowances | (7,976) | | | (7,930) | |
| Total deferred tax assets | 2,785 | | | 2,650 | |
| | | |
| Deferred tax liabilities: | | | |
| Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries | (60) | | | (27) | |
| Right-of-use assets from operating leases | (203) | | | 0 | |
| Other | (32) | | | (63) | |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | (295) | | | (90) | |
| Net deferred tax assets | $ | 2,490 | | | $ | 2,560 | |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| | | |
| | | |
| Deferred tax assets | $ | 2,515 | | | $ | 2,620 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | (25) | | | (60) | |
| Total | $ | 2,490 | | | $ | 2,560 | |
As of October 31, 2020, HP had recorded deferred tax assets for net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Gross NOLs | | Deferred Taxes on NOLs | | Valuation allowance | Initial Year of Expiration |
| | In millions | |
| Federal | $ | 291 | | | $ | 61 | | | $ | (15) | | 2023 |
| State | 2,737 | | | 174 | | | (61) | | 2020 |
| Foreign | 26,225 | | | 7,378 | | | (7,085) | | 2022 |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 29,253 | | | $ | 7,613 | | | $ | (7,161) | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Carryforward | | Valuation
Allowance | | Initial
Year of
Expiration |
| | In millions | | |
| Tax credits in state and foreign jurisdictions | $ | 307 |
| | $ | (42 | ) | | 2021 |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 307 |
| | $ | (42 | ) | | |
89
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
As of October 31, 2020, HP had recorded deferred tax assets for various tax credit carryforwards as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Carryforward | | Valuation
Allowance | | Initial
Year of
Expiration |
| | In millions | | |
| U.S. foreign tax credits | $ | 35 | | | $ | (35) | | | 2030 |
| U.S. R&D and other credits | 14 | | | 0 | | | 2040 |
| Tax credits in state and foreign jurisdictions | $ | 321 | | | $ | (59) | | | 2022 |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 370 | | | $ | (94) | | | |
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance
The deferred tax asset valuation allowance and changes were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 7,906 |
| | $ | 8,807 |
| | $ | 8,520 |
|
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (339 | ) | | (897 | ) | | 297 |
|
| Other comprehensive income, currency translation and charges to other accounts | 363 |
| | (4 | ) | | (10 | ) |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 7,930 |
| | $ | 7,906 |
| | $ | 8,807 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 7,930 | | | $ | 7,906 | | | $ | 8,807 | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | 74 | | | (339) | | | (897) | |
| Other comprehensive loss (income), currency translation and charges to other accounts | (28) | | | 363 | | | (4) | |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 7,976 | | | $ | 7,930 | | | $ | 7,906 | |
Gross deferred tax assets as of October 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 were reduced by valuation allowances of $7.9$8.0 billion, $7.9 billion and $8.8$7.9 billion, respectively. In fiscal year 2020, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance increased by $46 million primarily associated with foreign net operating losses and U.S. deferred tax assets that are anticipated to be realized at a lower effective rate than the federal statutory tax rate due to certain future U.S. international tax reform implications. In fiscal year 2019, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance increased by $24 million primarily associated with the recognition of the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers other than inventory, see Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for detailed information.inventory. This increase was partially offset by the impact of tax rate changes in foreign jurisdictions and state valuation allowance releases. In fiscal year 2018, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance decreased by $901 million primarily associated with foreign net operating losses and U.S. deferred tax assets that are anticipated to be realized at a lower effective rate than the federal statutory tax rate due to certain future U.S. international tax reform implications. In fiscal year 2017, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance increased by $287 million primarily associated with foreign net operating losses.
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information
Accounts Receivable, net
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Accounts receivable | $ | 6,142 |
| | $ | 5,242 |
|
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | (111 | ) | | (129 | ) |
| | $ | 6,031 |
| | $ | 5,113 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| Accounts receivable | $ | 5,503 | | | $ | 6,142 | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | (122) | | | (111) | |
| $ | 5,381 | | | $ | 6,031 | |
The allowance for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivable and changes were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 129 |
| | $ | 101 |
| | $ | 107 |
|
| Provision for doubtful accounts | 60 |
| | 57 |
| | 30 |
|
| Deductions, net of recoveries | (78 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (36 | ) |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 111 |
| | $ | 129 |
| | $ | 101 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 111 | | | $ | 129 | | | $ | 101 | |
| Provision for doubtful accounts | 62 | | | 60 | | | 57 | |
| Deductions, net of recoveries | (51) | | | (78) | | | (29) | |
| Balance at end of period | $ | 122 | | | $ | 111 | | | $ | 129 | |
HP has third-party arrangements, consisting of revolving short-term financing, which provide liquidity to certain partners to facilitate their working capital requirements. These financing arrangements, which in certain circumstances may contain partial recourse, result in a transfer of HP’s receivables and risk to the third-party. As these transfers qualify as true sales under the applicable accounting guidance, the receivables are de-recognized from the Consolidated Balance Sheets upon transfer, and HP receives a payment for the receivables from the third-party within a mutually agreed upon time period. For arrangements involving an element of recourse, the recourse obligation is measured using market data from the similar transactions and reported as a current liability inon the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The recourse obligations as of October 31, 20192020 and 20182019 were not material. The costs associated with the sales of trade receivables for fiscal year 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 were not material.
The following is a summary of the activity under these arrangements:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
Balance at beginning of year (1) | $ | 165 |
| | $ | 147 |
| | $ | 149 |
|
| Trade receivables sold | 10,257 |
| | 10,224 |
| | 9,553 |
|
| Cash receipts | (10,186 | ) | | (10,202 | ) | | (9,562 | ) |
| Foreign currency and other | (1 | ) | | (4 | ) | | 7 |
|
Balance at end of year (1) | $ | 235 |
| | $ | 165 |
| | $ | 147 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
Balance at beginning of year (1) | $ | 235 | | | $ | 165 | | | $ | 147 | |
| Trade receivables sold | 10,474 | | | 10,257 | | | 10,224 | |
| Cash receipts | (10,526) | | | (10,186) | | | (10,202) | |
| Foreign currency and other | 5 | | | (1) | | | (4) | |
Balance at end of year (1) | $ | 188 | | | $ | 235 | | | $ | 165 | |
(1) Amounts outstanding from third parties reported in Accounts Receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Inventory
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Finished goods | $ | 3,855 |
| | $ | 4,019 |
|
| Purchased parts and fabricated assemblies | 1,879 |
| | 2,043 |
|
| | $ | 5,734 |
| | $ | 6,062 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| Finished goods | $ | 3,662 | | | $ | 3,855 | |
| Purchased parts and fabricated assemblies | 2,301 | | | 1,879 | |
| $ | 5,963 | | | $ | 5,734 | |
Other Current Assets
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Supplier and other receivables | $ | 1,951 |
| | $ | 2,025 |
|
| Prepaid and other current assets | 967 |
| | 1,445 |
|
| Value-added taxes receivable | 957 |
| | 865 |
|
Available-for-sale investments (1) | — |
| | 711 |
|
| | $ | 3,875 |
| | $ | 5,046 |
|
| |
| See Note 9 “Fair Value” and Note 10, “Financial Instruments” for detailed information. |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| Supplier and other receivables | $ | 2,092 | | | $ | 1,951 | |
| Prepaid and other current assets | 1,104 | | | 967 | |
| Value-added taxes receivable | 970 | | | 957 | |
Available-for-sale investments(1) | 274 | | | 0 | |
| $ | 4,440 | | | $ | 3,875 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Land, buildings and leasehold improvements | $ | 1,977 |
| | $ | 1,893 |
|
| Machinery and equipment, including equipment held for lease | 5,060 |
| | 4,216 |
|
| | 7,037 |
| | 6,109 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation | (4,243 | ) | | (3,911 | ) |
| | $ | 2,794 |
| | $ | 2,198 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| Land, buildings and leasehold improvements | $ | 2,066 | | | $ | 1,977 | |
| Machinery and equipment, including equipment held for lease | 5,275 | | | 5,060 | |
| 7,341 | | | 7,037 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | (4,714) | | | (4,243) | |
| $ | 2,627 | | | $ | 2,794 | |
Depreciation expense was $673 million, $623 million $448 million and $353$448 million in fiscal years 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, respectively.
Other Non-Current Assets
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
Deferred tax assets(1) | $ | 2,515 | | | $ | 2,620 | |
Right-of-use assets from operating leases(2) | 1,107 | | | — | |
Intangible assets(3) | 540 | | | 661 | |
| | | |
Other(4) | 864 | | | 843 | |
| | $ | 5,026 | | | $ | 4,124 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
Deferred tax assets(1)
| $ | 2,620 |
| | $ | 2,431 |
|
Tax indemnifications receivable(2) | 42 |
| | 953 |
|
Intangible assets(3) | 661 |
| | 453 |
|
Other(4) | 801 |
| | 1,232 |
|
| | $ | 4,124 |
| | $ | 5,069 |
|
| |
(1)(1)See Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” for detailed information.
| See Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” for detailed information. |
| |
(2)
| See Note 15, “Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties” for detailed information. |
| |
(3) | See Note 8, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” for detailed information. |
| |
(4) | Includes marketable equity securities and mutual funds classified as available-for-sale investments of $56 million and $53 million at October 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. See Note 10, “Financial Instruments” for detailed information |
Other Current Liabilities(2)See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 17, “Leases” for detailed information.
(3)See Note 8, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” for detailed information.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Sales and marketing programs | $ | 3,361 |
| | $ | 2,758 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 1,178 |
| | 1,095 |
|
| Employee compensation and benefits | 1,103 |
| | 1,136 |
|
| Other accrued taxes | 1,060 |
| | 982 |
|
| Warranty | 663 |
| | 673 |
|
| Tax liability | 237 |
| | 340 |
|
| Other | 2,541 |
| | 1,868 |
|
| | $ | 10,143 |
| | $ | 8,852 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information (Continued)
Other Current Liabilities
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| Sales and marketing programs | $ | 3,185 | | | $ | 3,361 | |
| Deferred revenue | 1,208 | | | 1,178 | |
| Employee compensation and benefit | 1,194 | | | 1,103 | |
| Other accrued taxes | 1,051 | | | 1,060 | |
| Warranty | 746 | | | 663 | |
Operating lease liabilities(1) | 275 | | | — | |
| Tax liability | 223 | | | 237 | |
| Other | 2,960 | | | 2,541 | |
| | $ | 10,842 | | | $ | 10,143 | |
(1)See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 17, “Leases” for detailed information.
Other Non-Current Liabilities
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| Pension, post-retirement, and post-employment liabilities | $ | 1,576 | | | $ | 1,762 | |
| Deferred revenue | 1,072 | | | 1,069 | |
Operating lease liabilities(1) | 904 | | | — | |
| Tax liability | 746 | | | 848 | |
Deferred tax liability(2) | 25 | | | 60 | |
| Other | 823 | | | 848 | |
| | $ | 5,146 | | | $ | 4,587 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
Tax liability(1) | $ | 848 |
| | $ | 2,063 |
|
| Pension, post-retirement, and post-employment liabilities | 1,762 |
| | 1,645 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 1,069 |
| | 1,005 |
|
Deferred tax liability(1) | 60 |
| | 100 |
|
| Other | 848 |
| | 793 |
|
| | $ | 4,587 |
| | $ | 5,606 |
|
(2)See Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” for detailed information.
| |
(1)
| See Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” for detailed information. |
Interest and other, net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
Tax indemnifications(1) | $ | (1,186 | ) | | $ | (662 | ) | | $ | 47 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | — |
| | (126 | ) | | — |
|
| Interest expense on borrowings | (242 | ) | | (312 | ) | | (309 | ) |
| Other, net | 74 |
| | 282 |
| | 170 |
|
| | $ | (1,354 | ) | | $ | (818 | ) | | $ | (92 | ) |
| |
(1)
| Fiscal year ended October 31, 2019 and 2018, includes an adjustment of $764 million and $676 million respectively, of indemnification receivable, primarily related to resolution of various income tax audit settlements. Fiscal year ended October 31, 2019, also includes an adjustment of $417 million pursuant to the termination of the TMA with Hewlett Packard Enterprise. See Note 15, “Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties” for further information. |
Net Revenue by Region | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
Tax indemnifications(1) | $ | 1 | | | $ | (1,186) | | | $ | (662) | |
| Interest expense on borrowings | (239) | | | (242) | | | (312) | |
| Non-operating retirement- related credits | 240 | | | 85 | | | 233 | |
| Defined benefit plan settlement charges | (214) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | (40) | | | 0 | | | (126) | |
| Other, net | 21 | | | (11) | | | 49 | |
| | $ | (231) | | | $ | (1,354) | | | $ | (818) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
| Americas | $ | 25,244 |
| | $ | 25,644 |
| | $ | 23,891 |
|
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | 20,275 |
| | 20,470 |
| | 17,507 |
|
| Asia-Pacific and Japan | 13,237 |
| | 12,358 |
| | 10,658 |
|
| Total net revenue | $ | 58,756 |
| | $ | 58,472 |
| | $ | 52,056 |
|
93
As of October 31, 2019, the estimated value of transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations was $4.4 billion. HP expects to recognize approximately $1.8 billion of the unearned amount in next 12 months and $2.6 billion thereafter.Contents
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information (Continued)
Net Revenue by Region
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Americas | $ | 24,414 | | | $ | 25,244 | | | $ | 25,644 | |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | 19,624 | | | 20,275 | | | 20,470 | |
| Asia-Pacific and Japan | 12,601 | | | 13,237 | | | 12,358 | |
| Total net revenue | $ | 56,639 | | | $ | 58,756 | | | $ | 58,472 | |
Value of Remaining Performance Obligations
As of October 31, 2020, the estimated value of transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations was $4.1 billion. HP expects to recognize approximately $1.8 billion of the unearned amount in next 12 months and $2.3 billion thereafter.
HP has elected the practical expedients and accordingly does not disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations if:
•the contract has an original expected duration of one year or less; or
•the revenue from the performance obligation is recognized over time on an as-invoiced basis when the amount corresponds directly with the value to the customer; or
•the portion of the transaction price that is variable in nature is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation.
The remaining performance obligations are subject to change and may be affected by various factors, such as termination of contracts, contract modifications and adjustment for currency.
Costs of Obtaining Contracts and Fulfillment Cost
As of October 31, 2020, deferred contract fulfillment and acquisition costs balances were $65 million and $34 million, respectively, included in Other Current Assets and Other Non-Current Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2020, the Company amortized $98 million of these costs.
As of October 31, 2019, deferred contract fulfillment and acquisition costs balances were $47 million and $30 million, respectively, included in Other Current Assets and Other Non-Current Assets respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the twelve months ended October 31, 2019, the Company amortized $108 million of these costs.
Contract Liabilities
As of October 31, 2020 and 2019, HP’s contract liabilities balances were $2.2 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, included in Other Current Liabilities and Other Non-Current Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The increase in the contract liabilities balance for fiscal year 2020 was primarily driven by sales of fixed-price support and maintenance services, partially offset by $1.1 billion of revenue recognized that were included in the opening contract liabilities balance as of October 31, 2019.
As of October 31, 2019 and November 1, 2018, HP’s contract liabilities balances were $2.1 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, included in Other Current Liabilities and Other Non-Current Liabilities respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The increase in the contract liabilities balance for fiscal year 2019 iswas primarily driven by sales of fixed pricefixed-price support and maintenance services, partially offset by $922 million$0.9 billion of revenue recognized that were included in the opening contract liabilities balance as of November 1,October 31, 2018.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 8: Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill allocated to HP’s reportable segments and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Personal Systems | | Printing | | Total | | |
| In millions | | |
Balance at October 31, 2018(1) | $ | 2,600 | | | $ | 3,368 | | | $ | 5,968 | | | |
| Acquisitions/adjustments | 13 | | | 386 | | | 399 | | | |
| Foreign currency translation | 0 | | | 5 | | | 5 | | | |
Balance at October 31, 2019(1) | 2,613 | | | 3,759 | | | 6,372 | | | |
| Acquisitions/adjustments | 8 | | | 0 | | | 8 | | | |
| Foreign currency translation | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Balance at October 31, 2020(1) | $ | 2,621 | | | $ | 3,759 | | | $ | 6,380 | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Personal Systems | | Printing | | Total |
| | In millions |
Balance at October 31, 2017(1) | $ | 2,593 |
| | $ | 3,029 |
| | $ | 5,622 |
|
| Acquisitions | 7 |
| | 339 |
| | 346 |
|
Balance at October 31, 2018(1) | 2,600 |
| | 3,368 |
| | 5,968 |
|
| Acquisitions | 13 |
| | 386 |
| | 399 |
|
| Foreign currency translation | — |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
|
Balance at October 31, 2019(1) | $ | 2,613 |
| | $ | 3,759 |
| | $ | 6,372 |
|
| |
(1)
| Goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $0.8 billion related to Corporate Investments. |
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. As of October 31, 2019,2020, our reporting units are consistent with the reportable segments identified in Note 2, “Segment Information”. There were 0 goodwill impairments in fiscal years 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017.2018. Personal Systems had a negative carrying amount of net assets as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, primarily as a result of a favorable cash conversion cycle.
Intangible Assets
HP’s acquired intangible assets were composed of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2020 | | As of October 31, 2019 |
| | Gross | | Accumulated Amortization | | | | Net | | Gross | | Accumulated Amortization | | | | Net |
| | In millions |
| Customer contracts, customer lists and distribution agreements | | $ | 382 | | | $ | 149 | | | | | $ | 233 | | | $ | 385 | | | $ | 122 | | | | | $ | 263 | |
| Technology, patents and trade name | | 647 | | | 340 | | | | | 307 | | | 652 | | | 254 | | | | | 398 | |
| Total intangible assets | | $ | 1,029 | | | $ | 489 | | | | | $ | 540 | | | $ | 1,037 | | | $ | 376 | | | | | $ | 661 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of October 31, 2019 | | As of October 31, 2018 |
| | | Gross | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | | Gross | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| | | In millions |
| Customer contracts, customer lists and distribution agreements | | $ | 385 |
| | $ | 122 |
| | $ | 263 |
| | $ | 112 |
| | $ | 88 |
| | $ | 24 |
|
| Technology, patents and trade name | | 652 |
| | 254 |
| | 398 |
| | 601 |
| | 172 |
| | 429 |
|
| Total intangible assets | | $ | 1,037 |
| | $ | 376 |
| | $ | 661 |
| | $ | 713 |
| | $ | 260 |
| | $ | 453 |
|
As of October 31, 2020, estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets was as follows:
| | | | | |
| Fiscal year | In millions |
| 2021 | $ | 115 | |
| 2022 | 115 | |
| 2023 | 113 | |
| 2024 | 79 | |
| 2025 | 36 | |
| Thereafter | 82 | |
| Total | $ | 540 | |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 8: Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Continued)
For fiscal year 2019, the increase in gross intangible assets was primarily due to intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of the Apogee group.
The weighted-average useful lives of intangible assets acquired during the period are as follows: |
| |
| Weighted-Average Useful Life |
Customer contracts, customer lists and distribution agreements | 10 |
Technology, patents and trade name | 7 |
As of October 31, 2019, estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets was as follows |
| | | |
| Fiscal year | In millions |
| 2020 | $ | 114 |
|
| 2021 | 116 |
|
| 2022 | 116 |
|
| 2023 | 114 |
|
| 2024 | 80 |
|
| Thereafter | 121 |
|
| Total | $ | 661 |
|
Note 9: Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Fair Value Hierarchy
HP uses valuation techniques that are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs are developed using market data such as publicly available information and reflect the assumptions market participants would use, while unobservable inputs are developed using the best information available about the assumptions market participants would use. Assets and liabilities are classified in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and market-corroborated inputs.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to observable inputs and lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 9: Fair Value (Continued)
The following table presents HP’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2019 | | As of October 31, 2018 |
| | Fair Value Measured Using | | | | Fair Value Measured Using | | |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | In millions |
| Assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cash Equivalents: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Corporate debt | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,283 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,283 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,620 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,620 |
|
| Financial institution instruments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
|
Government debt(1) | 2,422 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,422 |
| | 2,217 |
| | 150 |
| | — |
| | 2,367 |
|
| Available-for-Sale Investments: |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Corporate debt | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 366 |
| | — |
| | 366 |
|
| Financial institution instruments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32 |
| | — |
| | 32 |
|
Government debt(1) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 313 |
| | — |
| | 313 |
|
| Marketable equity securities and Mutual funds | 6 |
| | 50 |
| | — |
| | 56 |
| | 53 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 53 |
|
| Derivative Instruments: |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |
|
| Interest rate contracts | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Foreign currency contracts | — |
| | 381 |
| | — |
| | 381 |
| | — |
| | 508 |
| | 7 |
| | 515 |
|
| Other derivatives | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total Assets | $ | 2,428 |
| | $ | 1,725 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,153 |
| | $ | 2,270 |
| | $ | 2,998 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 5,275 |
|
| Liabilities: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Derivative Instruments: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest rate contracts | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 23 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 23 |
|
| Foreign currency contracts | — |
| | 165 |
| | — |
| | 165 |
| | — |
| | 164 |
| | — |
| | 164 |
|
| Other derivatives | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
| Total Liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | 166 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 166 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 195 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 195 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2020 | | As of October 31, 2019 |
| | Fair Value Measured Using | | | | Fair Value Measured Using | | |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | In millions |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash Equivalents | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Corporate debt | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,700 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,700 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,283 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,283 | |
| Financial institution instruments | 0 | | | 59 | | | 0 | | | 59 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Government debt(1) | 1,992 | | | 181 | | | 0 | | | 2,173 | | | 2,422 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 2,422 | |
| Available-for-Sale Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Corporate debt | 0 | | | 169 | | | 0 | | | 169 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Financial institution instruments | 0 | | | 32 | | | 0 | | | 32 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Government debt(1) | 0 | | | 73 | | | 0 | | | 73 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Marketable equity securities and Mutual funds | 5 | | | 53 | | | 0 | | | 58 | | | 6 | | | 50 | | | 0 | | | 56 | |
| Derivative Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest rate contracts | 0 | | | 4 | | | 0 | | | 4 | | | 0 | | | 4 | | | 0 | | | 4 | |
| Foreign currency contracts | 0 | | | 191 | | | 0 | | | 191 | | | 0 | | | 381 | | | 0 | | | 381 | |
| Other derivatives | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 7 | |
| Total Assets | $ | 1,997 | | | $ | 2,462 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4,459 | | | $ | 2,428 | | | $ | 1,725 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4,153 | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest rate contracts | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Foreign currency contracts | 0 | | | 256 | | | 0 | | | 256 | | | 0 | | | 165 | | | 0 | | | 165 | |
| Other derivatives | 0 | | | 3 | | | 0 | | | 3 | | | 0 | | | 1 | | | 0 | | | 1 | |
| Total Liabilities | $ | 0 | | | $ | 262 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 262 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 166 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 166 | |
(1) Government debt includes instruments such as U.S. treasury notes, U.S. agency securities and non-U.S. government bonds. Money market funds invested in government debt and tradetraded in active markets are included in Level 1.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 9: Fair Value (Continued)
Valuation Techniques
Cash Equivalents and Investments: HP holds time deposits, money market funds, mutual funds, other debt securities primarily consisting of corporate and foreign government notes and bonds, and common stock and equivalents. HP values cash equivalents and equity investments using quoted market prices, alternative pricing sources, including net asset value, or models utilizing market observable inputs. The fair value of debt investments was based on quoted market prices or model-driven valuations using inputs primarily derived from or corroborated by observable market data, and, in certain instances, valuation models that utilize assumptions which cannot be corroborated with observable market data.
Derivative Instruments: From time to time, HP uses forward contracts, interest rate and total return swaps, treasury rate locks and, in the past,at times, option contracts to hedge certain foreign currency, interest rate and return on certain investment exposures. HP uses industry standard valuation models to measure fair value. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to present value using market-based observable inputs, including interest rate curves, HP and counterparty credit risk, foreign exchange rates, and forward and spot prices for currencies and interest rates. See Note 10, “Financial Instruments” for a further discussion of HP’s use of derivative instruments.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
Short- and Long-Term Debt: HP estimates the fair value of its debt primarily using an expected present value technique, which is based on observable market inputs using interest rates currently available to companies of similar credit standing for similar terms and remaining maturities and considering its own credit risk. The portion of HP’s debt that is hedged is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as an amount equal to the debt’s carrying amount and a fair value adjustment representing changes in the fair value of the hedged debt obligations arising from movements in benchmark interest rates. The fair value of
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 9: Fair Value (Continued)
HP’s short- and long-term debt was $5.4$6.7 billion at October 31, 20192020 compared to its carrying amount of $5.1$6.2 billion at that date. The fair value of HP’s short- and long-term debt was $6.0$5.4 billion as compared to its carrying value of $6.0$5.1 billion at October 31, 2018.2019. If measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, short- and long-term debt would be classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other Financial Instruments: For the balance of HP’s financial instruments, primarily accounts receivable, accounts payable and financial liabilities included in otherOther current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. If measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, these other financial instruments would be classified in Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Non-Marketable Equity Investments and Non-Financial Assets: HP’s non-marketable equity investments are measured at cost less impairment, adjusted for observable price changes. HP’s non-financial assets, such as intangible assets, goodwill and property, plant and equipment, are recorded at fair value in the period an impairment charge is recognized. If measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets these would generally be classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments
Cash Equivalents and Available-for-Sale Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2020 | | As of October 31, 2019 |
| | Cost | | Gross
Unrealized
Gain | | Gross
Unrealized
Loss | | Fair
Value | | Cost | | Gross
Unrealized
Gain | | Gross
Unrealized
Loss | | Fair
Value |
| | In millions |
| Cash Equivalents: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Corporate debt | $ | 1,700 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,700 | | | $ | 1,283 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,283 | |
| Financial institution instruments | 59 | | | — | | | — | | | 59 | | | 0 | | | — | | | — | | | 0 | |
| Government debt | 2,173 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,173 | | | 2,422 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,422 | |
| Total cash equivalents | 3,932 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,932 | | | 3,705 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,705 | |
| Available-for-Sale Investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate debt(1) | 169 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 169 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Financial institution instruments(1) | 32 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 32 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Government debt(1) | 73 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 73 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Marketable equity securities and Mutual funds | 42 | | | 16 | | | 0 | | | 58 | | | 40 | | | 16 | | | 0 | | | 56 | |
| Total available-for-sale investments | 316 | | | 16 | | | 0 | | | 332 | | | 40 | | | 16 | | | 0 | | | 56 | |
| Total cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments | $ | 4,248 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4,264 | | | $ | 3,745 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3,761 | |
(1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2019 | | As of October 31, 2018 |
| | Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gain | | Gross Unrealized Loss | | Fair Value | | Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gain | | Gross Unrealized Loss | | Fair Value |
| | In millions |
| Cash Equivalents: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Corporate debt | $ | 1,283 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,283 |
| | $ | 1,620 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,620 |
|
| Financial institution instruments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
|
| Government debt | 2,422 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,422 |
| | 2,367 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,367 |
|
| Total cash equivalents | 3,705 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,705 |
| | 3,996 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,996 |
|
| Available-for-Sale Investments: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Corporate debt(1) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 368 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | 366 |
|
Financial institution instruments(1) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32 |
|
Government debt(1) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 314 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 313 |
|
| Marketable equity securities and Mutual funds | 40 |
| | 16 |
| | — |
| | 56 |
| | 42 |
| | 11 |
| | — |
| | 53 |
|
| Total available-for-sale investments | 40 |
| | 16 |
| | — |
| | 56 |
| | 756 |
| | 11 |
| | (3 | ) | | 764 |
|
| Total cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments | $ | 3,745 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,761 |
| | $ | 4,752 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 4,760 |
|
| |
(1)
| HP classifies its marketable debt securities as available-for-sale investments within Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, including those with maturity dates beyond one year, based on their highly liquid nature and availability for use in current operations. |
All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition are considered cash equivalents. As of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the carrying amount of cash equivalents approximated fair value due to the short period of time to maturity. Interest income related to cash, cash equivalents and debt securities was approximately $40 million in fiscal year 2020, $80 million in fiscal year 2019, and $116 million in fiscal year 2018, and $66 million in fiscal year 2017.2018. The estimated fair value of the available-for-sale investments may not be representative of values that will be realized in the future.
EquityContractual maturities of investments in available-for-sale debt securities were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2020 |
| | Amortized
Cost | | Fair Value |
| | In millions |
| Due in one year | $ | 274 | | | $ | 274 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Non-marketable equity investments in privately held companies are included in Other non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounted to $46$44 million and $36$46 million as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively.
Derivative Instruments
HP uses derivatives to offset business exposure to foreign currency and interest rate risk on expected future cash flows and on certain existing assets and liabilities. As part of its risk management strategy, HP uses derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts, interest rate swaps, total return swaps, treasury rate locks and, at times, option contracts to hedge certain foreign currency, interest rate and, return on certain investment exposures. HP may designate its derivative contracts as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges and classifies the cash flows with the activities that correspond to the underlying hedged items. Additionally, for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, HP categorizes those economic hedges as other derivatives. HP recognizes all derivative instruments at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)
As a result of its use of derivative instruments, HP is exposed to the risk that its counterparties will fail to meet their contractual obligations. Master netting agreements mitigate credit exposure to counterparties by permitting HP to net amounts due from HP to counterparty against amounts due to HP from the same counterparty under certain conditions. To further limit credit risk, HP has collateral security agreements that allow HP’s custodian to hold collateral from, or require HP to post collateral to, counterparties when aggregate derivative fair values exceed contractually established thresholds which are generally based on the credit ratings of HP and its counterparties. If HP’s or the counterparty’s credit rating falls below a specified credit rating, either party has the right to request full collateralization of the derivatives’ net liability position. The fair value of derivatives with credit contingent features in a net liability position was $45$90 million and $68$45 million as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively, all of which were fully collateralized within two business days.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)
Under HP’s derivative contracts, the counterparty can terminate all outstanding trades following a covered change of control event affecting HP that results in the surviving entity being rated below a specified credit rating. This credit contingent provision did not affect HP’s financial position or cash flows as of October 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019.
Fair Value Hedges
HP enters into fair value hedges, such as interest rate swaps, to reduce the exposure of its debt portfolio to changes in fair value resulting from changes in benchmark interest rates by achieving a primarily U.S. dollar London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)-based floatingon HP’s future interest expense.rate payments.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, HP recognizes the change in fair value of the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item, in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period of change.
During the fiscal year 2020, HP terminated interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $0.5 billion that were de-designated as fair value hedges of certain fixed rate debt securities that were extinguished. HP also entered into $0.6 billion notional amount interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges to convert a portion of newly issued $1.15 billion fixed-rate debt to floating.
Cash Flow Hedges
HP uses forward contracts, treasury rate locks, and at times, option contracts designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks inherent in its forecasted net revenue, and, to a lesser extent, cost of revenue, operating expenses and operating expenses.debt issuance. HP’s foreign currency cash flow hedges mature predominantly within twelve months; however, hedges related to long-term procurement arrangements extend several years.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, HP initially records changes in fair value for the effective portion of the derivative instrument in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and subsequently reclassifies these amounts into earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. HP reports the effective portionchanges in the fair value of its cash flow hedgesthe derivative instrument in the same financial statement line item as changes in the fair value of the hedged item.
In March 2020, HP entered into a series of treasury rate lock agreements with notional amounts totaling $750 million to hedge the exposure to variability in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rate related to an anticipated issuance of long-term debt. These agreements were designated as cash flow hedges and were settled upon issuance of the senior notes in June 2020 resulting in an immaterial loss recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). The loss will be reclassified to Interest and other, net over the life of the related debt.
Other Derivatives
Other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments consist primarily of forward contracts used to hedge foreign currency-denominated balance sheet exposures. HP uses total return swaps to hedge its executive deferred compensation plan liability.
For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, HP recognizes changes in fair value of the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item, in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period of change.
Hedge Effectiveness
For interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges, HP measures hedge effectiveness by offsetting the change in fair value of the hedged item with the change in fair value of the derivative. For foreign currency options and forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges, HP measures hedge effectiveness by comparing the cumulative change in fair value of the hedge contract with the cumulative change in fair value of the hedged item, both of which are based on forward rates. HP recognizes any ineffective
As of October 31, 2020 and 2019, no portion of the hedge in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the same period in which ineffectiveness occurs. Amountshedging instruments’ gain or loss was excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in the Consolidated Statementsfor fair value and cash flow hedges.
Contents
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
The gross notional and fair value of derivative instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets waswere as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2020 | | As of October 31, 2019 |
| | Outstanding
Gross
Notional | | Other
Current
Assets | | Other
Non-Current
Assets | | Other
Current
Liabilities | | Other
Non-Current
Liabilities | | Outstanding
Gross
Notional | | Other
Current
Assets | | Other
Non-Current
Assets | | Other
Current
Liabilities | | Other
Non-Current
Liabilities |
| | In millions |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest rate contracts | $ | 875 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 750 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency contracts | 15,661 | | | 148 | | | 30 | | | 199 | | | 37 | | | 15,639 | | | 260 | | | 111 | | | 123 | | | 28 | |
| Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | 16,536 | | | 152 | | | 30 | | | 199 | | | 40 | | | 16,389 | | | 260 | | | 115 | | | 123 | | | 28 | |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency contracts | 5,319 | | | 13 | | | 0 | | | 20 | | | 0 | | | 7,146 | | | 10 | | | 0 | | | 14 | | | 0 | |
| Other derivatives | 142 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 3 | | | 0 | | | 134 | | | 7 | | | 0 | | | 1 | | | 0 | |
| Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | 5,461 | | | 13 | | | 0 | | | 23 | | | 0 | | | 7,280 | | | 17 | | | 0 | | | 15 | | | 0 | |
| Total derivatives | $ | 21,997 | | | $ | 165 | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | 222 | | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 23,669 | | | $ | 277 | | | $ | 115 | | | $ | 138 | | | $ | 28 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31, 2019 | | As of October 31, 2018 |
| | Outstanding Gross Notional | | Other Current Assets | | Other Non-Current Assets | | Other Current Liabilities | | Other Non-Current Liabilities | | Outstanding Gross Notional | | Other Current Assets | | Other Non-Current Assets | | Other Current Liabilities | | Other Non-Current Liabilities |
| | In millions |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Fair value hedges: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest rate contracts | $ | 750 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 23 |
|
| Cash flow hedges: | |
| | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Foreign currency contracts | 15,639 |
| | 260 |
| | 111 |
| | 123 |
| | 28 |
| | 17,147 |
| | 386 |
| | 107 |
| | 86 |
| | 52 |
|
| Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | 16,389 |
| | 260 |
| | 115 |
| | 123 |
| | 28 |
| | 18,147 |
| | 386 |
| | 107 |
| | 86 |
| | 75 |
|
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Foreign currency contracts | 7,146 |
| | 10 |
| | — |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| | 5,437 |
| | 22 |
| | — |
| | 26 |
| | — |
|
| Other derivatives | 134 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 122 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
|
| Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | 7,280 |
| | 17 |
| | — |
| | 15 |
| | — |
| | 5,559 |
| | 22 |
| | — |
| | 34 |
| | — |
|
| Total derivatives | $ | 23,669 |
| | $ | 277 |
| | $ | 115 |
| | $ | 138 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | 23,706 |
| | $ | 408 |
| | $ | 107 |
| | $ | 120 |
| | $ | 75 |
|
Offsetting of Derivative Instruments
HP recognizes all derivative instruments on a gross basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. HP does not offset the fair value of its derivative instruments against the fair value of cash collateral posted under its collateral security agreements. As of October 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, information related to the potential effect of HP’s master netting agreements and collateral security agreements was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | In the Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | | |
| | (i) | | (ii) | | (iii) = (i)–(ii) | | (iv) | | (v) | | | | (vi) = (iii)–(iv)–(v) |
| | Gross Amount
Recognized | | Gross Amount
Offset | | Net Amount
Presented | | Gross Amounts
Not Offset | | | | |
| | | | | Derivatives | | Financial
Collateral | | | | Net Amount |
| | In millions |
| As of October 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative assets | $ | 195 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 195 | | | $ | 156 | | | $ | 4 | | | (1) | | $ | 35 | |
| Derivative liabilities | $ | 262 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 262 | | | $ | 156 | | | $ | 130 | | | (2) | | $ | (24) | |
| As of October 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative assets | $ | 392 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 392 | | | $ | 113 | | | $ | 259 | | | (1) | | $ | 20 | |
| Derivative liabilities | $ | 166 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 166 | | | $ | 113 | | | $ | 43 | | | (2) | | $ | 10 | |
(1)Represents the cash collateral posted by counterparties as of the respective reporting date for HP’s asset position, net of derivative amounts that could be offset, as of, generally, two business days prior to the respective reporting date.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | In the Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | | |
| | (i) | | (ii) | | (iii) = (i)–(ii) | | (iv) | | (v) | | | | (vi) = (iii)–(iv)–(v) |
| | Gross Amount Recognized | | Gross Amount Offset | | Net Amount Presented | | Gross Amounts Not Offset | | | | |
| | | | | Derivatives | | Financial Collateral | | | | Net Amount |
| | In millions |
| As of October 31, 2019 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
|
| Derivative assets | $ | 392 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 392 |
| | $ | 113 |
| | $ | 259 |
| | (1) | | $ | 20 |
|
| Derivative liabilities | $ | 166 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 113 |
| | $ | 43 |
| | (2) | | $ | 10 |
|
| As of October 31, 2018 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
|
| Derivative assets | $ | 515 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 515 |
| | $ | 112 |
| | $ | 299 |
| | (1) | | $ | 104 |
|
| Derivative liabilities | $ | 195 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 195 |
| | $ | 112 |
| | $ | 69 |
| | (2) | | $ | 14 |
|
| |
| Represents the cash collateral posted by counterparties as of the respective reporting date for HP’s asset position, net of derivative amounts that could be offset, as of, generally, two business days prior to the respective reporting date. |
| |
(2)
| Represents the collateral posted by HP through re-use of counterparty cash collateral as of the respective reporting date for HP’s liability position, net of derivative amounts that could be offset, as of, generally, two business days prior to the respective reporting date. |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)
Effect of Derivative Instruments onin the Consolidated Statements of Earnings
The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items in a fair value hedging relationship for fiscal years ended October 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative Instrument | | Hedged Item | | Location | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | Total amounts of income/ (expense) line items in the statement of financial performance in which the effects of fair value hedges are recorded | | Gain/ (loss) recognized in earnings on derivative instrument | | (Loss)/ gain recognized in earnings on hedged item |
| | | | | | | | | In millions |
| Interest rate contracts | | Fixed-rate debt | | Interest and other, net | | 2020 | | $ | (231) | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | (6) | |
| | | | | | 2019 | | (1,354) | | | 27 | | | (27) | |
| | | | | | 2018 | | (818) | | | (11) | | | 11 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Instruments and Related Hedged Items |
| Derivative Instrument | | Location | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Hedged Item | | Location | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | | | In millions | | | | | | In millions |
| Interest rate contracts | | Interest and other, net | | $ | 27 |
| | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | (60 | ) | | Fixed-rate debt | | Interest and other, net | | $ | (27 | ) | | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 60 |
|
The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships for fiscal years ended October 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| (Loss)/ gain recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss on derivatives: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency contracts | $ | (197) | | | $ | 252 | | | $ | 341 | |
| Interest rate contracts | $ | (4) | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI
on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI
Into Earnings (Effective Portion) |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions | | | | In millions |
| Cash flow hedges: | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Foreign currency contracts | $ | 252 |
| | $ | 341 |
| | $ | (651 | ) | | Net revenue | | $ | 425 |
| | $ | (239 | ) | | $ | (156 | ) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | Cost of revenue | | (43 | ) | | (18 | ) | | (35 | ) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | Other operating expenses | | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | 1 |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | Interest and other, net | | — |
| | — |
| | (9 | ) |
| Total | $ | 252 |
| | $ | 341 |
| | $ | (651 | ) | | Total | | $ | 380 |
| | $ | (258 | ) | | $ | (199 | ) |
The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships included in earnings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total amounts of income/ (expense) line items in the statement of financial performance in which the effects of cash flow hedges are recorded | | Gain/ (loss) reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings |
| For the fiscal years ended October 31 | | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| In millions | | In millions |
| Net revenue | $ | 56,639 | | | $ | 58,756 | | | $ | 58,472 | | | $ | 108 | | | $ | 425 | | | $ | (239) | |
| Cost of revenue | (46,202) | | | (47,586) | | | (47,803) | | | (25) | | | (43) | | | (18) | |
| Operating expenses | (6,975) | | | (7,293) | | | (6,838) | | | 2 | | | (2) | | | (1) | |
| Total | $ | 3,462 | | | $ | 3,877 | | | $ | 3,831 | | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 380 | | | $ | (258) | |
As of October 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 0 portion of the hedging instruments’ gain or loss was excluded from the assessment of effectiveness for fair value or cash flow hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness for fair value and cash flow hedges was not material for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.
As of October 31, 2019,2020, HP expects to reclassify an estimated accumulatedAccumulated other comprehensive incomeloss of approximately $104$57 million, net of taxes, to earnings within the next twelve months associated with cash flow hedges along with the earnings effects of the related forecasted transactions. The amounts ultimately reclassified into earnings could be different from the amounts previously included in accumulated OCIAccumulated other comprehensive loss based on the change of market rate, and therefore could have different impact on earnings.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)
The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments recognized in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for fiscal years 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Loss) Gain Recognized in Income on Derivatives |
| | Location | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | | In millions |
| Foreign currency contracts | Interest and other, net | | $ | (119 | ) | | $ | 35 |
| | $ | (32 | ) |
| Other derivatives | Interest and other, net | | 14 |
| | (9 | ) | | 3 |
|
| Total | | | $ | (105 | ) | | $ | 26 |
| | $ | (29 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Gain/ (loss) recognized in earnings on derivative instrument |
| | Location | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | In millions |
| Foreign currency contracts | Interest and other, net | | $ | 40 | | | $ | (119) | | | $ | 35 | |
| Other derivatives | Interest and other, net | | (9) | | | 14 | | | (9) | |
| Total | | | $ | 31 | | | $ | (105) | | | $ | 26 | |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 11: Borrowings
Notes Payable and Short-Term Borrowings
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Amount Outstanding | | Weighted-Average Interest Rate | | Amount Outstanding | | Weighted-Average Interest Rate |
| | In millions | | | | In millions | | |
| Commercial paper | $ | — |
| | — | % | | $ | 854 |
| | 2.5 | % |
| Current portion of long-term debt | 307 |
| | 3.6 | % | | 565 |
| | 3.1 | % |
| Notes payable to banks, lines of credit and other | 50 |
| | 2.0 | % | | 44 |
| | 1.7 | % |
| | $ | 357 |
| | |
| | $ | 1,463 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | Amount
Outstanding | | Weighted-Average
Interest Rate | | Amount
Outstanding | | Weighted-Average
Interest Rate |
| | In millions |
| | | | | | | |
| Current portion of long-term debt | $ | 633 | | | 4.0 | % | | $ | 307 | | | 3.6 | % |
| Notes payable to banks, lines of credit and other | 41 | | | 1.6 | % | | 50 | | | 2.0 | % |
| | $ | 674 | | | | | $ | 357 | | | |
Long-Term Debt
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
U.S. Dollar Global Notes(1) | | | |
| 2009 Shelf Registration Statement: | | | |
| $1,350 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.827% in December 2010 at 3.75%, due December 2020 | $ | 0 | | | $ | 648 | |
| $1,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.799% in May 2011 at 4.3%, due June 2021 | 0 | | | 667 | |
| $1,000 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.816% in September 2011 at 4.375%, due September 2021 | 412 | | | 538 | |
| $1,500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.707% in December 2011 at 4.65%, due December 2021 | 586 | | | 695 | |
| $500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.771% in March 2012 at 4.05%, due September 2022 | 499 | | | 499 | |
| $1,200 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.863% in September 2011 at 6.0%, due September 2041 | 1,199 | | | 1,199 | |
| 2019 Shelf Registration Statement: | | | |
| $1,150 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.769% in June 2020 at 2.2%, due June 2025 | 1,148 | | | 0 | |
| $1,000 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.718% in June 2020 at 3.0%, due June 2027 | 997 | | | — | |
| $850 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.790% in June 2020 at 3.4%, due June 2030 | 848 | | | 0 | |
| | 5,689 | | | 4,246 | |
| Other borrowings at 0.51%-9.00%, due in fiscal years 2021-2027 | 522 | | | 853 | |
| Fair value adjustment related to hedged debt | 2 | | | 4 | |
| Unamortized debt issuance cost | (37) | | | (16) | |
| Current portion of long-term debt | (633) | | | (307) | |
| Total long-term debt | $ | 5,543 | | | $ | 4,780 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | As of October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
U.S. Dollar Global Notes(1) | |
| | |
|
| 2009 Shelf Registration Statement: | |
| | |
|
| $1,350 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.827% in December 2010 at 3.75%, due December 2020 | $ | 648 |
| | $ | 648 |
|
| $1,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.799% in May 2011 at 4.3%, due June 2021 | 667 |
| | 667 |
|
| $1,000 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.816% in September 2011 at 4.375%, due September 2021 | 538 |
| | 538 |
|
| $1,500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.707% in December 2011 at 4.65%, due December 2021 | 695 |
| | 694 |
|
| $500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.771% in March 2012 at 4.05%, due September 2022 | 499 |
| | 499 |
|
| $1,200 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.863% in September 2011 at 6.0%, due September 2041 | 1,199 |
| | 1,199 |
|
| 2012 Shelf Registration Statement: | |
| | |
|
| $750 issued at par in January 2014 at three-month USD LIBOR plus 0.94%, due January 2019 | — |
| | 102 |
|
| $1,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.954% in January 2014 at 2.75%, due January 2019 | — |
| | 300 |
|
| | 4,246 |
| | 4,647 |
|
| Other, including capital lease obligations, at 0.51%-8.43%, due in calendar years 2019-2029 | 853 |
| | 487 |
|
| Fair value adjustment related to hedged debt | 4 |
| | (28 | ) |
| Unamortized debt issuance cost | (16 | ) | | (17 | ) |
| Current portion of long-term debt | (307 | ) | | (565 | ) |
| Total long-term debt | $ | 4,780 |
| | $ | 4,524 |
|
| |
(1)
| HP may redeem some or all of the fixed-rate U.S. Dollar Global Notes at any time in accordance with the terms thereof. The U.S. Dollar Global Notes are senior unsecured debt. |
In December 2016, HP filed a shelf registration statement (the “2016 Shelf Registration Statement”) with the SEC to enable the company to offer for sale, from time to time, in one or more offerings, an unspecifiedterms thereof. The U.S. Dollar Global Notes are senior unsecured debt.
In June 2020, HP completed its public offering of $3.0 billion aggregate principal amount of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, depositary sharessenior unsecured notes, consisting of $1.15 billion of 2.2% notes due June 2025, $1.0 billion of 3.0% notes due June 2027, and warrants.$850 million of 3.4% notes due June 2030. HP incurred $26 million towards issuance costs. HP will pay interest semi-annually on the notes on June 17 and December 17, beginning December 17, 2020. HP had entered into treasury rate lock agreements with notional amounts totaling $750 million to hedge exposure to variability in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates related to the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. These agreements were settled upon issuance of the senior notes in June 2020. The net proceeds from this offering were used to fund approximately $0.7 billion and $0.9 billion for the cash tender offer (“Tender Offer”) and the redemption, respectively, of certain existing notes, as described below. Net proceeds from this offering in excess of the amounts used to repurchase the notes were used for general corporate purposes.
As disclosed in Note 10, “Financial Instruments”, HP uses interest rate swaps to mitigate some of the exposure of its debt portfolio to changes in fair value resulting from changes in benchmark interest rates by achieving a primarily U.S. dollar LIBOR-based floating interest expense.rates. Interest rates shown in the table of long-term debt have not been adjusted to reflect the impact of any interest rate swaps.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 11: Borrowings (Continued)
|
| | | |
| Fiscal year | In millions |
| 2020 | $ | 357 |
|
| 2021 | 251 |
|
| 2022 | 2,015 |
|
| 2023 | 1,273 |
|
| 2024 | 42 |
|
| Thereafter | 1,213 |
|
| Total | $ | 5,151 |
|
| | | | | |
| Fiscal year | In millions |
| 2021 | $ | 679 | |
| 2022 | 1,230 | |
| 2023 | 95 | |
| 2024 | 45 | |
| 2025 | 1,161 | |
| Thereafter | 3,051 | |
| Total | $ | 6,261 | |
Extinguishment of Debt
In March 2018,June 2020, HP commenced and completed a cash tender offer (the “Tender Offer")the Tender Offer to purchase approximately $1.85$0.7 billion in aggregate
principal amount of its outstanding U.S.US Dollar 4.650%3.750% Global Notes due December 9,1,2020, 4.300% Global Notes due June 1, 2021, 4.375% Global Notes due September 15, 2021 and 4.650% Global Notes due December 9, 2021.This extinguishment of debt resulted in a net loss of $23 million, which was recorded as Interest and other, net on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
On July 22, 2020, HP redeemed the remaining aggregate principal amounts of $0.5 billion in outstanding U.S. Dollar 3.750% Global Notes due December 1, 2020 and $0.4 billion in outstanding U.S. Dollar 4.300% Global Notes due June 1, 2021. In connection with the Tender Offer, HP also solicited consents from holders of its 4.650% Notes due December 2021, (the “4.650% Notes”) to amend the indenture under which the 4.650% Notes were issued to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants of the indenture (the “Proposed Amendments”). Holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding 4.650% Notes consented to the Proposed Amendments, and as a result, a supplemental indenture was executed on March 26, 2018 to effect the Proposed Amendments. This extinguishment of debt resulted in a net loss of $126$17 million, which was recorded as "InterestInterest and other, net"net on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings forEarnings.
As part of the year ended October 31, 2018.above transactions, HP terminated and settled interest rate swaps with a notional of $0.5 billion that were de-designated as fair value hedges.
Commercial Paper
As of October 31, 2019,2020, HP maintained two2 commercial paper programs. HP’s U.S. program provides for the issuance of U.S. dollar-denominated commercial paper up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $6.0 billion. HP’s euro commercial paper program provides for the issuance of commercial paper outside of the United States denominated in U.S. dollars, euros or British pounds up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $6.0 billion or the equivalent in those alternative currencies. The combined aggregate principal amount of commercial paper outstanding under those programs at any one time cannot exceed the $6.0 billion authorized by HP’s Board of Directors.
Credit FacilityFacilities
As of October 31, 2019,2020, HP maintained a $4.0 billion senior unsecured committed revolving credit facility to support the issuance of commercial paper or for general corporate purposes. Commitments under the revolving credit facility will be available until March 30, 2023. Commitment fees, interest rates and other terms of borrowing under the credit facilities vary based on HP’s external credit ratings.
On May 29, 2020, we entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility providing for a senior unsecured revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of $1.0 billion. Commitments under the 364-day revolving credit facility will be available until May 28, 2021. Funds borrowed under this revolving credit facility may be used for general corporate purposes.
As of October 31, 2019,2020, HP was in compliance with the financial covenants in the credit agreementagreements governing the revolving credit facility.facilities.
Available Borrowing Resources
As of October 31, 2019,2020, HP and HP’s subsidiaries had available borrowing resources of $724$725 million from uncommitted lines of credit in addition to the senior unsecured committed revolving credit facility discussed above.facilities.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 12: Stockholders’ Deficit
Share Repurchase Program
HP’s share repurchase program authorizes both open market and private repurchase transactions. In fiscal year 2020, HP executed share repurchases of 168 million shares and settled total shares for $3.1 billion. In fiscal year 2019, HP executed share repurchases of 118 million shares and settled total shares for $2.4 billion. In fiscal year 2018, HP executed share repurchases of 111 million shares and settled total shares for $2.6 billion. In fiscal year 2017, HP executed share repurchases of 80 million shares and settled total shares for $1.4 billion. Share repurchases executed during fiscal years 2020, 2019, and 2018 and 2017 included 2.3 million shares, 0.9 million shares, 1.0 million shares, and 1.51.0 million shares settled in November 2020, November 2019, and November 2018, and November 2017, respectively.
The shares repurchased in fiscal years 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 were all open market repurchase transactions. On June 19, 2018,February 22, 2020, HP’s Board of Directors authorized $4.0increased HP’s share repurchase authorization to $15.0 billion for future repurchases of its outstanding shares of common stock. On September 30, 2019, the Board authorized an additional $5.0 billion for future repurchases of its outstanding shares of common stock.in total. As of October 31, 2019,2020, HP had approximately $6.5$12.7 billion remaining under the share repurchase authorizations approved by HP’s Board of Directors.
On February 20, 2020, HP’s Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan and declared a dividend of 1 preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of HP’s common stock to shareholders of record on March 2, 2020. The dividend distribution was made on March 2, 2020. The rights were set to expire on February 20, 2021, unless terminated earlier by HP’s Board of Directors. The Board of Directors terminated the shareholder rights plan, effective June 25, 2020, and at the time of the termination, all rights distributed to holders of HP’s common stock under the shareholder rights plan expired.
Taxes related to Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Tax effect on change in unrealized components of available-for-sale debt securities: | | | | | |
| Tax benefit on unrealized losses arising during the period | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1 | |
| | | | | | |
| Tax effect on change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges: | | | | | |
| Tax benefit (provision) on unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period | 20 | | | (37) | | | (42) | |
| Tax provision (benefit) on (gains) losses reclassified into earnings | 28 | | | 46 | | | (26) | |
| | 48 | | | 9 | | | (68) | |
| Tax effect on change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans: | | | | | |
| Tax benefit on losses arising during the period | 11 | | | 64 | | | 0 | |
| Tax provision on amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit | (19) | | | (11) | | | (11) | |
| Tax provision on curtailments, settlements and other | (41) | | | (104) | | | (2) | |
| | (49) | | | (51) | | | (13) | |
| Tax effect on change in cumulative translation adjustment | 2 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Tax benefit (provision) on other comprehensive (loss) income | $ | 1 | | | $ | (42) | | | $ | (80) | |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 12: Stockholders’ Deficit (Continued)
Taxes related to Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions |
| Tax effect on change in unrealized components of available-for-sale debt securities: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Tax (provision) benefit on unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (1 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Tax effect on change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges: | | | |
| | |
|
| Tax (provision) benefit on unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period | (37 | ) | | (42 | ) | | 42 |
|
| Tax provision (benefit) on (gains) losses reclassified into earnings | 46 |
| | (26 | ) | | (16 | ) |
| | 9 |
| | (68 | ) | | 26 |
|
| Tax effect on change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans: | | | |
| | |
|
| Tax benefit (provision) on (losses) gains arising during the period | 64 |
| | — |
| | (140 | ) |
| Tax provision on amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit | (11 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (21 | ) |
| Tax (provision) benefit on curtailments, settlements and other | (104 | ) | | (2 | ) | | 72 |
|
| | (51 | ) | | (13 | ) | | (89 | ) |
| Tax effect on change in cumulative translation adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Tax (provision) benefit on other comprehensive (loss) income
| $ | (42 | ) |
| $ | (80 | ) |
| $ | (64 | ) |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 12: Stockholders’ Deficit (Continued)
Changes and reclassifications related to Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of taxes | | | | For the fiscal years ended
October 31 | | For the year ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions | | In millions |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes: | |
| | |
| | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes: | | | | | |
| Change in unrealized components of available-for-sale debt securities: | |
| | |
| | |
| Change in unrealized components of available-for-sale debt securities: | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 3 |
| Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period | $ | 2 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (2) | |
| Losses (gains) reclassified into earnings | 3 |
| | (5 | ) | | — |
| Losses (gains) reclassified into earnings | 0 | | | 3 | | | (5) | |
| | 4 |
| | (7 | ) | | 3 |
| | 2 | | | 4 | | | (7) | |
| Change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges: | |
| | |
| | |
| Change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges: | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period | 215 |
| | 299 |
| | (609 | ) | |
| Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period | | Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period | (181) | | | 215 | | | 299 | |
| (Gains) losses reclassified into earnings | (334 | ) | | 232 |
| | 183 |
| (Gains) losses reclassified into earnings | (57) | | | (334) | | | 232 | |
| | (119 | ) | | 531 |
| | (426 | ) | | (238) | | | (119) | | | 531 | |
| Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans: | |
| | |
| | |
| Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans: | | | | | |
| (Losses) gains arising during the period | (239 | ) | | 11 |
| | 315 |
| (Losses) gains arising during the period | (18) | | | (239) | | | 11 | |
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit(1) | 32 |
| | 37 |
| | 53 |
| Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit(1) | 64 | | | 32 | | | 37 | |
| Curtailments, settlements and other | (62 | ) | | 1 |
| | 75 |
| Curtailments, settlements and other | 174 | | | (62) | | | 1 | |
| | (269 | ) | | 49 |
| | 443 |
| | 220 | | | (269) | | | 49 | |
| Change in cumulative translation adjustment: | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Change in cumulative translation adjustment: | (2) | | | 4 | | | 0 | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes | $ | (380 | ) | | $ | 573 |
| | $ | 20 |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes | $ | (18) | | | $ | (380) | | | $ | 573 | |
| |
(1)
| These components are included in the computation of net pension and post-retirement benefit (credit) charges in Note 4, |
“Retirement(1)These components are included in the computation of net pension and post-retirement benefit (credit) charges in Note 4,
“Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans”.
The components of accumulatedAccumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes as of October 31, 20192020 and changes during fiscal year 20192020 were as follows:
| | | | Net unrealized
gains on
available-for-sale
securities | | Net unrealized
gains (losses) on
cash flow
hedges | | Unrealized
components
of defined
benefit plans | | Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
| Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss | | Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | | Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges | | Unrealized components of defined benefit plans | | Change in cumulative translation adjustment | | Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| | In millions | | In millions |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 291 |
| | $ | (1,141 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| $ | (845 | ) | Balance at beginning of period | $ | 9 | | | $ | 172 | | | $ | (1,410) | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | (1,225) | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications | 1 |
| | 215 |
| | (239 | ) | | 4 |
|
| (19 | ) | |
| Reclassifications of losses (gains) into earnings | 3 |
| | (334 | ) | | 32 |
| | — |
|
| (299 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | | Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | 2 | | | (181) | | | (18) | | | (2) | | | (199) | |
| Reclassifications of (gains) losses into earnings | | Reclassifications of (gains) losses into earnings | 0 | | | (57) | | | 64 | | | 0 | | | 7 | |
| Reclassifications of curtailments, settlements and other into earnings | — |
| | — |
| | (62 | ) | | — |
| | (62 | ) | Reclassifications of curtailments, settlements and other into earnings | — | | | — | | | 174 | | | — | | | 174 | |
| Balance at end of period | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 172 |
| | $ | (1,410 | ) | | $ | 4 |
| | $ | (1,225 | ) | Balance at end of period | $ | 11 | | | $ | (66) | | | $ | (1,190) | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | (1,243) | |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 13: Earnings Per Share
HP calculates basic net EPS using net earnings and the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net EPS includes any dilutive effect of restricted stock units, stock options, performance-based awards and shares purchased under the 2011 employee stock purchase plan.
A reconciliation of the number of shares used for basic and diluted net EPS calculations is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions, except per share amounts |
| Numerator: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Net earnings | $ | 2,844 | | | $ | 3,152 | | | $ | 5,327 | |
| Denominator: | | | | | |
| Weighted-average shares used to compute basic net EPS | 1,413 | | | 1,515 | | | 1,615 | |
| Dilutive effect of employee stock plans | 7 | | | 9 | | | 19 | |
| Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted net EPS | 1,420 | | | 1,524 | | | 1,634 | |
| Net earnings per share: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 2.01 | | | $ | 2.08 | | | $ | 3.30 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Diluted | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | 2.07 | | | $ | 3.26 | |
Anti-dilutive weighted-average stock-based compensation awards(1) | 13 | | | 7 | | | 0 | |
(1)HP excludes from the calculation of diluted net EPS stock options and restricted stock units where the assumed proceeds exceed the average market price, because their effect would be anti-dilutive. The assumed proceeds of a stock option include the sum of its exercise price, and average unrecognized compensation cost. The assumed proceeds of a restricted stock unit represent unrecognized compensation cost.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | In millions, except per share amounts |
| Numerator: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net earnings | $ | 3,152 |
| | $ | 5,327 |
| | $ | 2,526 |
|
| Denominator: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Weighted-average shares used to compute basic net EPS | 1,515 |
| | 1,615 |
| | 1,688 |
|
| Dilutive effect of employee stock plans | 9 |
| | 19 |
| | 14 |
|
| Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted net EPS | 1,524 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 1,702 |
|
| Net earnings per share: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Basic | $ | 2.08 |
| | $ | 3.30 |
| | $ | 1.50 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 2.07 |
| | $ | 3.26 |
| | $ | 1.48 |
|
Anti-dilutive weighted-average stock-based compensation awards(1) | 7 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| |
| HP excludes from the calculation of diluted net EPS stock options and restricted stock units where the assumed proceeds exceed the average market price, because their effect would be anti-dilutive. The assumed proceeds of a stock option include the sum of its exercise price, and average unrecognized compensation cost. The assumed proceeds of a restricted stock unit represent unrecognized compensation cost. |
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies
HP is involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including those identified below, consisting of IP, commercial, securities, employment, employee benefits and environmental matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. HP accrues a liability when management believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. HP believes it has recorded adequate provisions for any such matters and, as of October 31, 2019,2020, it was not reasonably possible that a material loss had been incurred in excess of the amounts recognized in HP’s financial statements. HP reviews these matters at least quarterly and adjusts its accruals to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, HP shares responsibility with Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain matters, as indicated below, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise has agreed to indemnify HP in whole or in part with respect to certain matters. Based on its experience, HP believes that any damage amounts claimed in the specific matters discussed below are not a meaningful indicator of HP’s potential liability. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. However, HP believes it has valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against it. Nevertheless, cash flows or results of operations could be materially affected in any particular period by the resolution of one or more of these contingencies.
Litigation, Proceedings and Investigations
Copyright Levies. Proceedings are ongoing or have been concluded involving HP in certain European countries, including litigation in Belgium and other countries, seeking to impose or modify levies upon IT equipment (such as multifunction devices (“MFDs”) and PCs), alleging that these devices enable the production of private copies of copyrighted materials. The levies are generally based upon the number of products sold and the per-product amounts of the levies, which vary. Some European countries that do not yet have levies on digital devices are expected to implement similar legislation to enable them to extend existing levy schemes, while other European countries have phased out levies or are expected to limit the scope of levy schemes and applicability in the digital hardware environment, particularly with respect to sales to business users. HP, other companies and various industry associations have opposed the extension of levies to the digital environment and have advocated alternative models of compensation to rights holders.
Reprobel SCRL (“Reprobel”), a collecting society administering the remuneration for reprography to Belgian copyright holders, requested by extrajudicial means that HP amend certain copyright levy declarations submitted for inkjet MFDs sold in Belgium from January 2005 to December 2009 to enable it to collect copyright levies calculated based on the generally higher copying speed when the MFDs are operated in draft print mode rather than when operated in normal print mode. In March 2010, HP filed a lawsuit against Reprobel in the Brussels Court of First Instance of Brusselsin Belgium, seeking a declaratory judgment that no copyright levies are payable on sales of MFDs in Belgium or, alternatively, that payments already made by HP are sufficient to comply with its obligations. The Brussels Court of Appeal in Brussels (the “Court of Appeal”) stayed the proceedings and referred several questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”). On November 12, 2015, the CJEU published its judgment providing that a national legislation such as the Belgian one at issue in the main proceedings is incompatible with EU law on multiple legal points, as argued by HP, and returned the proceedings to the referring court. On May 12, 2017, the Court of Appeal held that (1) reprographic copyright levies are due notwithstanding the lack of conformity of the Belgian system with EU law in certain aspects and (2) the applicable levies are to be calculated based on the objective speed of each MFD as established by an expert appointed by the Court of Appeal. HP appealed this decision before the Belgian Supreme Court on January 18, 2018. The Belgian Supreme Court rejected HP’s appeal on September 24, 2020 and the matter has been remitted to the Court of Appeal, where the expert will give an opinion on the objective speed and amount of compensation due.
Based on industry opposition to the extension of levies to digital products, HP’s assessments of the merits of various proceedings and HP’s estimates of the number of units impacted and the amounts of the levies, HP has accrued amounts that it believes are adequate to address the ongoing disputes.
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Oracle Corporation. On June 15, 2011, HP filed suit against Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) in California Superior Court in Santa Clara County in connection with Oracle’s March 2011 announcement that it was discontinuing software support for HP’s Itanium-based line of mission criticalmission-critical servers. HP asserted, among other things, that Oracle’s actions breached the contract that was signed by the parties as part of the settlement of the litigation relating to Oracle’s hiring of Mark Hurd. The matter eventually progressed to trial, which was bifurcated into two phases. HP prevailed in the first phase of the trial, in which the court ruled that the contract at issue required Oracle to continue to offer its software products on HP’s Itanium-based servers for as long as HP decided to sell such servers. The second phase of the trial was then postponed by Oracle’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of Oracle’s “anti-SLAPP” motion, in which Oracle argued that HP’s
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
damages claim infringed on Oracle’s First Amendment rights. On August 27, 2015, the California Court of Appeals rejected Oracle’s appeal. The matter was remanded to the trial court for the second phase of the trial, which began on May 23, 2016 and was submitted to the jury on June 29, 2016. On June 30, 2016, the jury returned a verdict in favor of HP, awarding HP
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
approximately $3.0 billion in damages, which included approximately $1.7 billion for past lost profits and $1.3 billion for future lost profits. On October 20, 2016, the court entered judgment for HP for this amount with interest accruing until the judgment is paid. Oracle’s motion for new trial was denied on December 19, 2016, and Oracle filed its notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment on January 17, 2017. On February 2, 2017, HP filed a notice of cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s denial of prejudgment interest. The case is fully briefed and awaiting the Court of Appeals to schedule oral argument. HP expects that the appeals process could take several years to complete. Litigation is unpredictable, and there can be no assurance that HP will recover damages, or that any award of damages will be for the amount awarded by the jury’s verdict. The amount ultimately awarded, if any, would be recorded in the period received. No adjustment has been recorded in the financial statements in relation to this potential award. Pursuant to the terms of the separation and distribution agreement, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise will share equally in any recovery from Oracle once Hewlett Packard Enterprise has been reimbursed for all costs incurred in the prosecution of the action prior to the Separation.
Forsyth, et al. vs.v. HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. This is a purported class and collective action filed on August 18, 2016 in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, against HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise alleging the defendants violated the Federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, California public policy and the California Business and Professions Code by terminating older workers and replacing them with younger workers. PlaintiffsThe operative complaint is the Fourth Amended Complaint, filed on July 9, 2020. NaN named and opt-in plaintiffs remain. By their complaint, plaintiffs seek to certifyrepresent (1) a putative nationwide ADEA collective class action under the ADEA comprised of all U.S. residents employed by defendantsindividuals 40 years of age and older who had their employment terminated pursuant to a workforce reduction (“WFR”)WFR plan on or after May 23, 2012December 9, 2014 or April 8, 2015, depending on state law; and who were 40 years of age or older. Plaintiffs also seek to represent(2) a putative Rule 23 class under California law comprised of all personsindividuals 40 years orof age and older employed by defendantswho had their employment terminated in the state of California and terminated pursuant to a WFR plan on or after May 23,August 18, 2012. FollowingExcluded from the putative collective and class are employees who (a) signed a partial motionWaiver and General Release Agreement at termination, or (b) signed an Agreement to dismiss, a motion to strikeArbitrate Claims. A similar purported collective and a motion to compel arbitration that the defendants filed in November 2016, the plaintiffs amended their complaint. New plaintiffs were added,class are proposed for Hewlett Packard Enterprise, but the plaintiffs agreed thattime periods start on November 1, 2015. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages in the class period forform of back and front pay and benefits, liquidated damages under the nationwide collective action should be shortenedADEA, punitive damages under the state law claims, an award of attorneys’ fees, and now starts on December 9, 2014.other relief. On January 30, 2017, the defendants filed another partial motion to dismiss and motions to compel arbitration as to several of the plaintiffs. On March 20, 2017, the defendants filed additional motions to compel arbitration as to a number of the opt-in plaintiffs. On September 20, 2017, the Court granted the motions to compel arbitration as to the plaintiffs and opt-ins who signed WFR release agreements, and also stayed the entire case until the arbitrations are completed. On November 30, 2017, 3 named plaintiffs and 12 opt-in plaintiffs filed a single arbitration demand. An additional arbitration claimant was added later by stipulation. On December 22, 2017, theAugust 24, 2020, defendants filed a motion to (1) staydismiss or strike allegations from the case pending arbitrations and (2) enjoinoperative complaint, which the demanded arbitration and require each plaintiff to file a separate arbitration demand. On February 6, 2018, the Court granted the motion to stay andcourt denied the motion to enjoin. Pre-arbitration mediation proceedings took place on October 4 and 5, 2018, and the claims of all 16 arbitration claimants were resolved. Between November 2018 and April 2019, an additional 154 individuals15, 2020. Defendants filed consents to opt‐in to the action as party‐plaintiffs. Of the new opt-ins, 145 signed separation agreements that include class waivers and mandatory arbitration provisions. The addition of these opt-ins brings the total number of named and opt-in plaintiffs to 193. Mediation proceedings took place in June 2019 with respect to the 145 opt-ins who signed separation agreements, and the parties are continuing to engage in settlement discussions. The stay of the litigation remains in place.
Jackson, et al. v. HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. This putative nationwide class action was filedtheir answers on July 24, 2017 in federal district court in San Jose, California. The plaintiffs purport to bring the lawsuit on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated African-Americans and individuals over the age of 40. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants engaged in a pattern and practice of racial and age discrimination in lay-offs and promotions. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on SeptemberOctober 29, 2017. On January 12, 2018, the defendants moved to transfer the matter to the federal district court in the Northern District of Georgia. The defendants also moved to dismiss the claims on various grounds and to strike certain aspects of the proposed class definition. The Court dismissed the action on the basis of improper venue. On July 23, 2018, the plaintiffs refiled the case in the Northern District of Georgia. On August 9, 2018, the plaintiffs also filed a notice of appeal of the dismissal order with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On October 1, 2018, the Georgia court granted the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to stay and administratively close the Georgia action until the Ninth Circuit appeal is decided.2020.
India Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Proceedings.Proceedings. On April 30 and May 10, 2010, the India Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (the “DRI”) issued show cause notices to Hewlett-Packard India Sales Private Limited (“HP India”), a subsidiary of HP, 7 HP India employees and 1 former HP India employee alleging that HP India underpaid customs duties while importing products and spare parts into India and seeking to recover an aggregate of approximately $370 million, plus penalties. Prior to the issuance of the show cause notices, HP India deposited approximately $16 million with the DRI and agreed to post a provisional bond in exchange for the DRI’s agreement to not seize HP India products and spare parts and to not interrupt the transaction of business by HP India.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
On April 11, 2012, the Bangalore Commissioner of Customs issued an order on the products-related show cause notice affirming certain duties and penalties against HP India and the named individuals of approximately $386 million, of which HP India had already deposited $9 million. On December 11, 2012, HP India voluntarily deposited an additional $10 million in connection with the products-related show cause notice. The differential duty demand is subject to interest. On April 20, 2012, the Commissioner issued an order on the parts-related show cause notice affirming certain duties and penalties against HP India and certain of the named individuals of approximately $17 million, of which HP India had already deposited $7 million. After the order, HP India deposited an additional $3 million in connection with the parts-related show cause notice so as to avoid certain penalties.
HP India filed appeals of the Commissioner’s orders before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (the “Customs Tribunal”) along with applications for waiver of the pre-deposit of remaining demand amounts as a condition for hearing the appeals. The Customs Department has also filed cross-appeals before the Customs Tribunal. On January 24, 2013, the Customs Tribunal ordered HP India to deposit an additional $24 million against the products order, which HP India deposited in March 2013. The Customs Tribunal did not order any additional deposit to be made under the parts order. In December 2013, HP India filed applications before the Customs Tribunal seeking early hearing of the appeals as well as an extension of the stay of deposit as to HP India and the individuals already granted until final disposition of the appeals. On
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
February 7, 2014, the application for extension of the stay of deposit was granted by the Customs Tribunal until disposal of the appeals. On October 27, 2014, the Customs Tribunal commenced hearings on the cross-appeals of the Commissioner’s orders. The Customs Tribunal rejected HP India’s request to remand the matter to the Commissioner on procedural grounds. The hearings scheduled to reconvene on April 6, 2015 and again on November 3, 2015 and April 11, 2016 were canceled at the request of the Customs Tribunal. A hearing on the merits of the appeal scheduled for January 15, 2019 has been cancelled. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, Hewlett Packard Enterprise has agreed to indemnify HP in part, based on the extent to which any liability arises from the products and spare parts of Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s businesses.
Neodron Patent Litigation. United States. On May 21, 2019, Neodron Ltd. (“Neodron”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Hewlett Packard Enterprise in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. On the same day, Neodron filed a companion complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 against seven sets of respondents, including Hewlett Packard Enterprise. On May 23 and June 14, 2019, Neodron filed amended complaints in the ITC and the Western District of Texas, respectively, to replace Hewlett Packard Enterprise with HP. Both complaints allegealleged that certain touch-controlled devices infringe 4 patents owned by Neodron. On June 19, 2019, the ITC instituted an investigation. The ITC hearing is scheduled to begin on March 23, 2020, and the ITC’s target date for completion of the investigation is October 26, 2020. The district court action is stayed pending resolution of the ITC proceedings. In the ITC proceeding, Neodron seekssought an order enjoining HP from importing, selling for importation, or selling after importation certain touch-controlled notebook computers and tablets. On June 28, 2019, Neodron filed a second lawsuit in the Western District of Texas, asserting 4 additional patents against HP touch-controlled devices. Neodron amended its complaint in the second lawsuit to assert a total of 8 patents against HP touch-controlled devices. Neodron seekssought unspecified damages and a permanent injunction, among other remedies.
Germany. On October 29, 2019, Neodron served HP with a claim of patent infringement at the Munich State Court in Germany. The patent asserted in the German case is related to a patent asserted in the ITC. This case will consist of anThe initial hearing in March 2020 and formal hearing in latewas held on July 29, 2020. If the German court findshad found infringement of a valid patent, the court may issuehave issued an injunction as part of any remedy.
Settlement of Litigation. On July 31, 2020, HP and Neodron entered into an agreement to settle all pending litigation between them on a worldwide basis, and all pending legal actions against one another have been dismissed.
Slingshot Printing LLC Litigation. On June 11, 2019, Slingshot Printing LLC (“Slingshot”) filed 3 complaints in U.S. District Court in the Western District of Texas alleging HP infringes or has infringed 16 patents. On September 20, 2019, Slingshot filed a 4th complaint and amended the three earlier complaints, alleging that HP infringes or has infringed NaN patents. On December 12, 2019, Slingshot voluntarily dismissed its allegations as to 1 patent because it did not own a related patent. On January 23, 2020, Slingshot filed a fifth complaint, re-asserting the dismissed patent as well as the related patent. On February 13, 2020, Slingshot voluntarily dismissed its allegations as to another patent, which was asserted in its third complaint. On March 25, 2020, Slingshot voluntarily dismissed its allegations as to an additional patent, which was also asserted in its third complaint. Slingshot is currently asserting a total of 31 patents. The accused products include inkjet printers, cartridges, and printheads. The complaints seek monetary damages.
Philips Patent Litigation. On September 17, 2020, Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Philips North America LLC (collectively, “Philips”) filed a complaint against HP for patent infringement in federal court for the District of Delaware. On September 18, 2020, Philips filed a companion complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 against HP and 8 other sets of respondents. Both the district court complaint and the ITC complaint allege that certain digital video-capable devices and components thereof infringe 4 of Philips owned patents. On October 16, 2020, the ITC instituted an investigation. The investigation is in its early stages, and the ITC’s final decision is due by February 22, 2022. In the ITC proceeding, Philips seeks an order enjoining respondents from importing, or selling after importation, certain digital video-capable devices and components thereof, including certain PCs, display devices, and components thereof. In the district court action, Philips seeks unspecified damages and an injunction against HP, among other remedies.
Caltech Patent Litigation. On November 11, 2020, the California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) filed a complaint against HP for patent infringement in the federal court for the Western District of Texas. The complaint alleges infringement of 3 of Caltech’s patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,116,710, 7,421,032 and 7,916,781. The accused products are HP commercial and consumer PCs that comply with the IEEE 802.11n, 802.11ac, and/or 802.11ax standards. Caltech seeks unspecified damages and other relief.
In re HP Inc. Securities Litigation (Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. v. HP Inc., et al.). On February 19, 2020, Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. filed a putative class action complaint against HP, Dion Weisler, Catherine Lesjak, and Steven Fieler in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California. On May 20,
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
2020, the court appointed the State of Rhode Island, Office of the General Treasurer, on behalf of the Employees’ Retirement System of Rhode Island and Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds as Lead Plaintiffs. On July 20, 2020, Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, which additionally names as defendants Enrique Lores and Christoph Schell. The amended complaint alleges, among other things, that from February 23, 2017 to October 3, 2019, HP and the named officers violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by making false or misleading statements about HP’s printing supplies business, including HP’s use of its four-box model to predict the demand for supplies. It further alleges that Dion Weisler and Enrique Lores violated Sections 10(b) and 20A of the Exchange Act by allegedly selling shares of HP common stock during this period while in possession of material, non-public adverse information about HP’s print business. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages and other relief. On October 2, 2020, HP and the named officers filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. That motion is due to be fully briefed in early 2021.
York County on behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund v. HP Inc., et al. On November 5, 2020, York County, on behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund, filed a putative class action complaint against HP, Dion Weisler, and Catherine Lesjak in federal court in the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges, among other things, that from November 6, 2015 to June 21, 2016, HP and the named former officers violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by concealing material information and making false statements about HP’s printing supplies business, including information about HP’s channel inventory management and sales practices. Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages and other relief.
Legal Proceedings re Authentication of Supplies. Civil litigation or government investigations are pending in the United States, Italy, Israel, and the Netherlands involving supplies authentication protocols used in certain HP printers. These protocols are often referred to as Dynamic Security. The core allegations in these proceedings claim misleading or inadequate consumer notifications and permissions pertaining to the use of Dynamic Security, the impact of firmware updates, or the potential inability of cartridges with clone chips or circuitry to work in HP printers with Dynamic Security.
123Inkt Foundation litigation (Netherlands). On November 23, 2016, a foundation known as Stichting 123Inkt-Huismerk Klanten (the “Foundation”) filed a complaint in district court in Amsterdam against HP Nederland B.V. and HP Inc. arising out of the use of Dynamic Security in certain OfficeJet printers. Digital Revolution B.V. (a.k.a. 123Inkt) established the Foundation to pursue the interests of approximately 960 of its customers who transferred their claims to it. The complaint alleges: (1) violation of right of ownership; (2) destruction and damage to property; (3) computer vandalism; (4) unlawful act; (5) non-compliance; (6) unfair commercial practices; (7) misleading commercial practices; and (8) misleading advertising. The complaint seeks injunctive relief to prohibit use of Dynamic Security, damages, and attorneys’ fees. On December 27, 2017, the District Court dismissed the case and awarded fees to HP. On January 25, 2018, the Foundation filed a summons with the Amsterdam Court of Appeal to appeal. On December 17, 2019, the Court of Appeal set aside the judgment of the District Court, adopted a new decision declaring that HP provided inadequate and partially incorrect information to the Foundation members around September 13, 2016, awarded damages to them in an amount to be later determined, but denied all other claims, including injunctive relief, holding that the use of Dynamic Security is not inherently impermissible and the Foundation lacks legal interest to pursue such action. On March 19, 2020, the Foundation filed a cassation writ of summons with the Supreme Court of the Netherlands (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) appealing the decision of the Court of Appeal. On May 29, 2020, HP filed its statement of defense and incidental appeal in cassation with the Supreme Court appealing the decision of the Court of Appeal. On October 30, 2020, the parties filed their opening briefs with the Supreme Court.
Gensin v. HP Inc. (Israel). On October 25, 2017, a purported consumer class action, captioned Gensin v. HP Inc., was filed in the District Court in Jerusalem against HP arising out of the use of Dynamic Security in certain OfficeJet printers. The petition and motion for certification as a class action alleges: (1) tortious wrongdoing in violation of the Computers Law, 5755-1995; (2) breach of Contracts Law, 5731-1970; (3) breach of the Consumer Protection Law, 5741-1981; (4) negligence; and (5) improper enrichment. The named petitioner initially sought to represent nationwide classes comprised of anyone who “owns an HP printer that has been blocked, disrupted, or interfered with by HP in the use of ink cartridges not manufactured by HP” or who “purchased ink cartridges not manufactured by HP for use in the blocked printers.” Plaintiff seeks class relief, injunctive relief, damages, and attorneys’ fees. On November 16, 2017, a second purported consumer class action was filed against HP in the Central District Court, captioned Dror v. HP, Inc., also arising out of the use of Dynamic Security in certain OfficeJet printers. The petition and motion allege similar causes of action on behalf of similar nationwide classes. After the Dror case was consolidated with the Gensin case in Jerusalem, the District Court on June 24, 2018 dismissed the Dror case and designated Gensin as the lead matter. On March 9, 2020, the petitioner moved to modify the proposed nationwide class to be comprised of “[a]ll persons who have an HP printer and whose printer was blocked or rendered unusable by HP with any ink cartridge that is not made by HP” and “[a]ll persons who purchased ink cartridges that are not made by HP, for use in the Blocked Printers.” On July 2, 2020, HP filed its response to the amended petition.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
Parziale v. HP IncInc. (United States).On August 27, 2019, a purported consumer class action was filed against HP in federal court in the Northern District of California arising out of the supplies authentication protocoluse of Dynamic Security in certain OfficeJet printers. The complaint which was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, captioned Parziale v. HP, Inc., alleges two causes of action under Florida Consumer Protection statutes: (1) violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, F.S.A. §§ 501.201 et seq., and (2) violation of the Florida Misleading Advertisement Law, F.S.A. §§ 817.41 et seq. The named plaintiff a Florida resident who purchased OfficeJet printers in Florida, seeks to represent a nationwide class of “[a]ll United States Citizens who, between the applicable statute of limitations and the present, had an HP Printer that was modified to reject third party ink cartridges or refilled HP ink cartridges.” On October 30, 2019, HP moved to dismiss the complaint. On November 13, 2019, plaintiff filed an
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
amended complaint, adding the following newthree causes of action to the case: (1) violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030 et seq., (2) trespass to chattels, and (3) tortious interference with business relations. Plaintiff seeks class relief, injunctive relief, damages, including punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees. On December 30, 2019, HP moved to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint. On April 24, 2020, the Court granted in part and denied in part HP’s motion to dismiss. The Court dismissed plaintiff’s causes of action under the Florida Consumer Protection statutes, as well as the tortious interference with business relations claim and four of the five claims under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The Court denied HP’s motion to dismiss on the remaining claims and on the request for injunctive relief and granted plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. On June 5, 2020, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on behalf of both a nationwide class and a Florida subclass alleging violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and trespass to chattels. Plaintiff sought class relief, injunctive relief, damages, including punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees. On September 29, 2020, the Court granted HP’s motion to dismiss, dismissing the case in full with prejudice. Plaintiff filed notice of appeal, and its opening brief is due in early 2021.
Consumer Protection Investigation (Italy). On September 26, 2019, the Italian Competition Authority (Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato) (“AGCM”) served a Notice of Initiation of Proceedings on HP concerning the investigation of alleged aggressive practices involving undue influence on consumers and alleged misleading actions and omissions regarding the restriction or prevention of the use of third-party ink cartridges in HP printers, accompanied by a request for information. HP submitted its reply to the AGCM’s request for information on November 15, 2019 and has addressed subsequent requests for information. On May 22, 2020, the AGCM gave notice that it intended to expand its investigation into certain alleged warranty practices regarding the use of third-party cartridges. On June 26, 2020, HP submitted its response to the warranty allegations. On December 7, 2020, the AGCM notified HP of the AGCM’s final decision finding that HP engaged in 2 unfair commercial practices as follows: (a) the information HP provided to consumers about limitations on the use of certain third-party cartridges in HP printers was allegedly misleading pursuant to Articles 20, 21 and 22 of the Italian Consumer Code, and (b) the alleged use of data to deny warranty coverage and certain alleged data collection practices were aggressive pursuant to Articles 20, 24 and 25 of the Italian Consumer Code. The final decision (i) orders HP to end the allegedly unfair commercial practices; (ii) fines HP €5 million for each alleged unfair practice (total €10 million); (iii) requires HP to file a compliance report within 60 days; (iv) orders HP to publicly publish a corrective statement within 120 days; and (v) orders HP to amend the packaging of its printers within 120 days. The fines are payable within 30 days. HP has 60 days to appeal and intends to appeal.
Digital Revolution B.V. v. HP Nederland B.V., et al. (Netherlands). On March 30, 2020, Digital Revolution B.V. (a.k.a. 123Inkt) served a complaint filed in Amsterdam District Court arising out of the use of Dynamic Security in certain HP printers. The complaint alleges several causes of action: (1) abuse of dominant position; (2) misleading advertising; (3) unfair and misleading commercial practice; and (4) misleading comparative advertising. The complaint seeks injunctive relief, including prohibition of Dynamic Security and disclosure of cartridge authentication protocols, damages, and attorneys’ fees. The parties’ initial appearance in front of the Court took place on July 8, 2020. On September 9, 2020, HP filed its defense and a counterclaim for unfair commercial practices and misleading and unlawful comparative advertising against Digital Revolution B.V.
SEC Investigation. In 2017, the Company received a subpoena from the SEC requesting documents regarding HP’s printing supplies business for the time period before June 2016, with a primary focus on the APJ region. HP fully cooperated with the SEC in connection with its investigation. On September 30, 2020, HP settled with the SEC and entered into an administrative resolution that included findings by the SEC that HP violated Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder, by failing to disclose certain known trends and uncertainties regarding supplies sales practices and their impact on margin and supplies channel inventory, and that it provided incomplete disclosures regarding supplies channel inventory in its SEC filings and related earnings calls from November 2015 through June 2016. The SEC order imposed a civil penalty of $6 million. HP neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
Autonomy-Related Legal Matters
Investigations.Investigations. As a result of the findings of an ongoing investigation, HP has provided information to the U.K. Serious Fraud Office, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the SEC related to the accounting improprieties, disclosure failures and misrepresentations at Autonomy that occurred prior to and in connection with HP’s acquisition of Autonomy. On January 19, 2015, the U.K. Serious Fraud Office notified HP that it was closing its investigation and had decided to cede jurisdiction of the investigation to the U.S. authorities. On November 14, 2016, the DOJ announced that a federal grand jury indicted Sushovan Hussain, the former CFO of Autonomy. Mr. Hussain was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud, and multiple counts of wire fraud. The indictment alleged that Mr. Hussain engaged in a scheme to defraud purchasers and sellers of securities of Autonomy and HP about the true performance of Autonomy’s business, its financial condition, and its prospects for growth. A jury trial commenced on February 26, 2018. On April 30, 2018, the jury found Mr. Hussain guilty of all charges against him. On August 26, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of conviction against Mr. Hussain. On November 15, 2016, the SEC announced that Stouffer Egan, the former CEO of Autonomy’s U.S.-based operations, settled charges relating to his participation in an accounting scheme to meet internal sales targets and analyst revenue expectations. On November 29, 2018, the DOJ announced that a federal grand jury indicted Michael Lynch, former CEO of Autonomy, and Stephen Chamberlain, former VP of Finance of Autonomy. Dr. Lynch and Mr. Chamberlain were charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and multiple counts of wire fraud. HP is continuing to cooperate with the ongoing enforcement actions.
Autonomy Corporation Limited v. Michael Lynch and Sushovan Hussain.Hussain. On April 17, 2015, 4 former HP subsidiaries that became subsidiaries of Hewlett Packard Enterprise at the time of the Separation (Autonomy Corporation Limited, Hewlett Packard Vision BV, Autonomy Systems, Limited, and Autonomy, Inc.) initiated civil proceedings in the U.K. High Court of Justice against 2 members of Autonomy’s former management, Michael Lynch and Sushovan Hussain. The Particulars of Claim seek damages in excess of $5 billion from Messrs. Lynch and Hussain for breach of their fiduciary duties by causing Autonomy group companies to engage in improper transactions and accounting practices. On October 1, 2015, Messrs. Lynch and Hussain filed their defenses. Mr. Lynch also filed a counterclaim against Autonomy Corporation Limited seeking $160 million in damages, among other things, for alleged misstatements regarding Lynch. The Hewlett Packard Enterprise subsidiary claimants filed their replies to the defenses and the asserted counter-claim on March 11, 2016. The parties are actively engaged in the disclosure process. Trial began on March 25, 2019 and is scheduled to continue throughwas completed in January 2020. The parties are awaiting a ruling from the remainder of 2019.Court.
Environmental
HP’s business is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that could result in costs or other sanctions that adversely affect our business and results of operations. For example, HP is subject to laws and regulations concerning environmental protection, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the clean-up of contaminated sites, the content of HP’s products and the recycling, treatment and disposal of those products, including batteries. In particular, HP faces increasing complexity in its product design and procurement operations as it adjusts to new and future requirements relating to the chemical and materials composition of its products, their safe use, the energy consumption associated with those products, climate change laws and regulations, and product repairability, reuse and take-back legislation. HP could incur substantial costs, its products could be restricted from entering certain jurisdictions, and it could face other sanctions, if it were to violate or become liable under environmental laws or if its products become noncompliant with environmental laws. HP’s potential exposure includes fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage or personal injury claims and clean-up costs. The amount and timing of costs to comply with environmental laws are difficult to predict.
HP is party to, or otherwise involved in, proceedings brought by U.S. or state environmental agencies under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), known as “Superfund,” or state laws similar to CERCLA, and may become a party to, or otherwise involved in, proceedings brought by private parties for contribution towards clean-up costs. HP is also conducting environmental investigations or remediations at several current or former operating sites pursuant to administrative orders or consent agreements with state environmental agencies.
The separation and distribution agreement between HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise includes provisions that provide for the allocation of environmental liabilities between HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise including certain remediation obligations; responsibilities arising from the chemical and materials composition of their respective products, their safe use and their energy consumption; obligations under product take back legislation that addresses the collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of products; and other
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
environmental matters. HP will generally be responsible for environmental liabilities related to the properties and other assets, including products, allocated to HP under the separation and distribution agreement and other ancillary agreements. Under these
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
agreements, HP will indemnify Hewlett Packard Enterprise for liabilities for specified ongoing remediation projects, subject to certain limitations, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a payment obligation for a specified portion of the cost of those remediation projects. In addition, HP will share with Hewlett Packard Enterprise other environmental liabilities as set forth in the separation and distribution agreement. HP is indemnified in whole or in part by Hewlett Packard Enterprise for liabilities arising from the assets assigned to Hewlett Packard Enterprise and for certain environmental matters as detailed in the separation and distribution agreement.
Note 15: Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties
Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, HP may issue performance guarantees to certain of its clients, customers and other parties pursuant to which HP has guaranteed the performance obligations of third parties. Some of those guarantees may be backed by standby letters of credit or surety bonds. In general, HP would be obligated to perform over the term of the guarantee in the event a specified triggering event occurs as defined by the guarantee. HP believes the likelihood of having to perform under a material guarantee is remote.
Cross-Indemnifications with Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Under the separation and distribution agreement, HP agreed to indemnify Hewlett Packard Enterprise, each of its subsidiaries and each of their respective directors, officers and employees from and against all liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from, among other matters, the liabilities allocated to HP as part of the Separation. Hewlett Packard Enterprise similarly agreed to indemnify HP, each of its subsidiaries and each of their respective directors, officers and employees from and against all liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from, among other matters, the liabilities allocated to Hewlett Packard Enterprise as part of the Separation. HP expects Hewlett Packard Enterprise to fully perform under the terms of the separation and distribution agreement.
For information on cross-indemnifications with Hewlett Packard Enterprise for litigation matters, see Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies”.
In connection with the Separation, HP entered into the TMATax Matters Agreement (“TMA”) with Hewlett Packard Enterprise, effective on November 1, 2015. The TMA provided that HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise will share certain pre-Separation income tax liabilities. The TMA was terminated during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, HP enters into contractual arrangements under which HP may agree to indemnify a third party to such arrangement from any losses incurred relating to the services they perform on behalf of HP or for losses arising from certain events as defined within the particular contract, which may include, for example, litigation or claims relating to past performance. HP also provides indemnifications to certain vendors and customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the vendors’ and customers’ use of HP’s software products and services and certain other matters. Some indemnifications may not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, payments made related to these indemnifications have been immaterial.
HP records tax indemnification receivables from various third parties for certain tax liabilities that HP is jointly and severally liable for, but for which it is indemnified by those same third parties under existing legal agreements. HP records a tax indemnification payable to various third parties under these agreements when management believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The actual amount that the third parties pay or may be obligated to pay HP could vary depending on the outcome of certain unresolved tax matters, which may not be resolved for several years. The net payable and net receivable as of October 31, 2019 and October 31, 2018 were $57 million and $1.0 billion, respectively. During fiscal year 2019, $1.0 billion of indemnification receivables was reduced primarily due to resolution of various tax matters amounting to $0.8 billion.
Warranties
HP accrues the estimated cost of product warranties at the time it recognizes revenue. HP engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of its component suppliers; however, contractual warranty terms, repair costs, product call rates, average cost per call, current period product shipments and ongoing product failure rates, as well as specific product class failures outside of HP’s baseline experience, affect the estimated warranty obligation.
HP’s aggregate product warranty liabilities and changes were as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 15: Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | In millions |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 922 | | | $ | 915 | |
| Accruals for warranties issued | 977 | | | 1,051 | |
| Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates) | 38 | | | (3) | |
| Settlements made (in cash or in kind) | (944) | | | (1,041) | |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 993 | | | $ | 922 | |
HP’s aggregate product warranty liabilities and changes were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | For the fiscal years ended October 31 |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | In millions |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 915 |
| | $ | 898 |
|
| Accruals for warranties issued | 1,051 |
| | 1,042 |
|
| Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates) | (3 | ) | | (15 | ) |
| Settlements made (in cash or in kind) | (1,041 | ) | | (1,010 | ) |
| Balance at end of year | $ | 922 |
| | $ | 915 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 16: Commitments
Lease Commitments
HP leases certain real and personal property under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain leases require HP to pay property taxes, insurance and routine maintenance and include renewal options and escalation clauses. Rent expense was approximately $0.2 billion in each of fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.
As of October 31, 2019, future minimum operating lease commitments were as follows:
|
| | | |
| Fiscal year | In millions |
| 2020 | $ | 310 |
|
| 2021 | 242 |
|
| 2022 | 192 |
|
| 2023 | 162 |
|
| 2024 | 126 |
|
| Thereafter | 438 |
|
| Less: Sublease rental income | (130 | ) |
| Total | $ | 1,340 |
|
Unconditional Purchase Obligations
As of October 31, 2019,2020, HP had unconditional purchase obligations of $372$499 million. These unconditional purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on HP and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions and the approximate timing of the transaction. These unconditional purchase obligations are primarily related to inventory and service support. Unconditional purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty.
As of October 31, 2019,2020, unconditional purchase obligations were as follows:
| | | | | |
| Fiscal year | In millions |
| 2021 | $ | 290 | |
| 2022 | 116 | |
| 2023 | 47 | |
| 2024 | 35 | |
| 2025 | 5 | |
| Thereafter | 6 | |
| Total | $ | 499 | |
|
| | | |
| Fiscal year | In millions |
| 2020 | $ | 176 |
|
| 2021 | 111 |
|
| 2022 | 67 |
|
| 2023 | 18 |
|
| 2024 | — |
|
| Thereafter | — |
|
| Total | $ | 372 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 17: Leases
HP determines, at lease inception, whether or not an arrangement contains a lease. A significant portion of the operating lease portfolio includes real estate leases. Additionally, HP has identified embedded operating leases within certain outsourced supply chain contracts. Leasing arrangements typically range in terms from 1 to 13 years with varying renewal and termination options. Substantially all of HP’s leases are considered operating leases. Finance leases, short-term leases and sub-lease income were not material as of October 31, 2020 or for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2020.
Lease terms include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that HP will exercise such options. HP generally considers the economic life of the ROU assets to be comparable to the useful life of similar owned assets. HP’s leases generally do not provide a residual guarantee.
Operating leases are included in Other non-current assets, Other current liabilities and Other non-current liabilities. Finance leases are included in Property, plant and equipment, net, Notes payable and short-term borrowings and Long-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As most of the leases do not provide an implicit interest rate, HP uses the incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date of a lease in determining the present value of lease payments. The incremental borrowing rate is determined based on the rate of interest that HP would have to pay to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments on a collateralized basis over a similar term. HP uses the unsecured borrowing rate and risk-adjusts that rate to approximate a collateralized rate.
HP has elected the practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components as a single lease element for its real estate leases and certain outsourced supply chain contracts in calculating the ROU assets and lease liabilities. Where HP chooses not to combine the lease and non-lease components, HP allocates contract consideration to the lease and non-lease components based on relative standalone prices.
HP reviews the impairment of the ROU assets consistent with the approach applied for other long-lived assets.
The components of lease expense are as follows:
| | | | | |
| For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2020 |
| In millions |
| Operating lease cost | $ | 236 | |
| Variable cost | 108 | |
| Total lease expense | $ | 344 | |
All lease expenses, including variable lease costs, are primarily included in Cost of revenue and Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings based on the use of the facilities.
Variable lease expense relates primarily to leased real estate utilized for office space and outsourced warehousing. These costs primarily include adjustments for inflation, payments dependent on a rate or index or usage of asset and common area maintenance charges. These costs are not included in the lease liability and are recognized in the period in which they are incurred.
The following table presents supplemental information relating to the cash flows arising from lease transactions. Cash payments made from variable lease costs and short-term leases are not included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities, and, as such, are excluded from the amounts below:
| | | | | |
| For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2020 |
| In millions |
| Cash paid for amount included in the measurement of lease liabilities | $ | 236 | |
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange of lease liabilities(1) | $ | 226 | |
(1) Includes the impact of new leases as well as remeasurements and modifications to existing leases.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 17: Leases (Continued)
Weighted-average information associated with the measurement of our remaining operating lease liabilities is as follows:
| | | | | |
| As of October 31, 2020 |
| Weighted-average remaining lease term in years | 6 |
| Weighted-average discount rate | 3.1 | % |
The following maturity analysis presents expected undiscounted cash outflows for operating leases on an annual basis for the next five years:
| | | | | |
| Fiscal year | In millions |
| 2021 | $ | 303 | |
| 2022 | 247 | |
| 2023 | 191 | |
| 2024 | 131 | |
| 2025 | 110 | |
| Thereafter | 297 | |
| Total lease payments | $ | 1,279 | |
| Less: Imputed interest | (100) | |
| Total lease liabilities | $ | 1,179 | |
The following table, which was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019, depicts gross minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable leases for real estate, personal property leases, sublease income commitments and operating lease commitments at October 31, 2019:
| | | | | |
| Fiscal year | In millions |
| Less than 1 year | $ | 284 | |
| 1-3 years | 399 | |
| 3-5 years | 262 | |
| More than 5 years | 395 | |
Total (1) | $ | 1,340 | |
(1) Amounts represent the operating lease obligations, net of total sublease income of $130 million.
There were no material operating leases that HP had entered into and that were yet to commence as of October 31, 2020.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 18: Acquisitions
Acquisitions in Fiscal Year 2019
On November 1, 2018, HP completed the acquisition of the Apogee group. This acquisition furthers HP’s plan to disrupt the A3 copier market and builds on its printing strategy to enhance its A3 and A4 product portfolio; build differentiated solutions and tools to expand its MPS, and invest in its direct and indirect go-to-market capabilities. Apogee augments HP’s services portfolio in contractual office printing and MPS, where solutions are increasingly important for SMBs. HP reports the financial results of the above business in the Printing segment.
The table below presents the purchase price allocation. |
| | | |
| | In millions |
| Goodwill | $ | 382 |
|
| Amortizable intangible assets | 292 |
|
| Net liabilities assumed | (196 | ) |
| Total fair value of consideration | $ | 478 |
|
Acquisitions in Fiscal Year 2018
On November 1, 2017, HP completed the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business. With this acquisition, HP now offers the industry’s strongest portfolio of A3 multifunction printers that deliver the simplicity of printers with the high performance of copiers. The fully integrated portfolio, including next-generation PageWide technologies, offers opportunities to grow managed print and document services as sales models shift from transactional to contractual. HP reports the financial results of the above business in the Printing segment.
The table below presents the purchase price allocation.
| | | | | |
| In millions |
| Goodwill | $ | 382 | |
| Amortizable intangible assets | 292 | |
| Net liabilities assumed | (196) | |
| Total fair value of consideration | $ | 478 | |
|
| | | |
| In millions |
| Goodwill | $ | 339 |
|
| Amortizable intangible assets | 521 |
|
| Net assets assumed | 191 |
|
| Total fair value of consideration | $ | 1,051 |
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Quarterly Summary
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the three-month fiscal periods
ended in fiscal year 2020 |
| | January 31 | | April 30 | | July 31 | | October 31 |
| Net revenue | $ | 14,618 | | | $ | 12,469 | | | $ | 14,294 | | | $ | 15,258 | |
| Cost of revenue | 11,746 | | | 9,976 | | | 11,901 | | | 12,579 | |
| Earnings from operations | 865 | | | 826 | | | 779 | | | 992 | |
| Net earnings | $ | 678 | | | $ | 764 | | | $ | 734 | | | $ | 668 | |
Net earnings per share:(1) | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.47 | | | $ | 0.53 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.50 | |
| Diluted | $ | 0.46 | | | $ | 0.53 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.49 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Cash dividends paid per share | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.17 | | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the three-month fiscal periods
ended in fiscal year 2019 |
| | January 31 | | April 30 | | July 31 | | October 31 |
| Net revenue | $ | 14,710 | | | $ | 14,036 | | | $ | 14,603 | | | $ | 15,407 | |
| Cost of revenue | 12,098 | | | 11,307 | | | 11,698 | | | 12,483 | |
| Earnings from operations | 926 | | | 928 | | | 1,079 | | | 944 | |
| Net earnings | $ | 803 | | | $ | 782 | | | $ | 1,179 | | | $ | 388 | |
Net earnings per share:(1) | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.79 | | | $ | 0.26 | |
| Diluted | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.78 | | | $ | 0.26 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Cash dividends paid per share | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the three-month fiscal periods ended in fiscal year 2018 |
| | January 31 | | April 30 | | July 31 | | October 31 |
| Net revenue | $ | 14,517 |
| | $ | 14,003 |
| | $ | 14,586 |
| | $ | 15,366 |
|
| Cost of revenue | 11,935 |
| | 11,301 |
| | 11,898 |
| | 12,669 |
|
| Earnings from operations | 913 |
| | 906 |
| | 1,018 |
| | 994 |
|
| Net earnings | $ | 1,938 |
| | $ | 1,058 |
| | $ | 880 |
| | $ | 1,451 |
|
Net earnings per share:(1) | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 1.17 |
| | $ | 0.65 |
| | $ | 0.55 |
| | $ | 0.92 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 1.16 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.54 |
| | $ | 0.91 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Cash dividends paid per share | $ | 0.14 |
| | $ | 0.14 |
| | $ | 0.14 |
| | $ | 0.14 |
|
| |
(1)
| Net EPS for each quarter is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during that quarter, while EPS for the fiscal year is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the year. Hence, the sum of the EPS for each of the four quarters may not equal the EPS for the fiscal year. |
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in our SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to HP’s management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that there has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 20192020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We do not believe there has been any material impact to our internal controls over financial reporting notwithstanding that most of our employees are working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to monitor and assess the COVID-19 situation on our internal controls to address any potential impact on their design and operating effectiveness.
See Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on our internal control over financial reporting in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9B. Other Information.
Disclosure Under Section 13(r)None.
Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires issuers to disclose certain types of dealings by the issuer or its affiliates relating to Iran or with certain individuals or entities that are subject to sanctions under U.S. law.
HP acquired the Apogee group, a U.K. based office equipment dealer, on November 1, 2018. As disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2019, during the first quarter of 2019, HP discovered that its newly acquired subsidiary processed two service calls during November 2018, shortly after the acquisition, for toner replacement on behalf of Bank Saderat plc, with which it had a legacy contract. Bank Saderat plc is subject to U.S. sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13224. The combined total value of the transactions was £85.52 ($112.92). We are unable to accurately calculate the net profit attributable to these transactions. Following HP’s discovery of these transactions and at HP’s direction, Apogee terminated the contract with Bank Saderat plc. As disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2019, during the second quarter of 2019, HP discovered that its newly acquired subsidiary had invoiced one payment and accepted two payments from Bank Sepah International plc shortly after the acquisition, under a legacy contract for copier services. Bank Sepah International plc is subject to U.S. sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13382. The combined total value of the transactions was £72.49 ($92.78). We are unable to accurately calculate the net profit attributable to these transactions. Following HP’s discovery of these transactions and at HP’s direction, Apogee terminated the contract with Bank Sepah International plc. HP has disclosed these transactions to the relevant authorities.
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The names of the executive officers of HP and their ages, titles and biographies as of the date hereof are incorporated by reference from Part I, Item 1, above.
The following information is included in HP’s Proxy Statement related to its 20192020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after HP’s fiscal year end of October 31, 20192020 (the “Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference:
•Information regarding directors of HP who are standing for reelection and any persons nominated to become directors of HP is set forth under “Corporate Governance—Governance and Board of Directors—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors.”
•Information regarding HP’s Audit Committee and designated “audit committee financial experts” is set forth under “Corporate Governance—Governance and Board of Directors—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—How We Are Organized—Audit Committee.”
•Information on HP’s code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, also known as “Integrity at HP”, is set forth under “Corporate Governance—Governance and Board of Directors—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—How We Govern and Are Governed—Code of Conduct” and information on HP’s Corporate Governance Guidelines is set forth under “—How We Are Selected—Director Nominees and Director Nominees’ Experience and Qualifications” and “—How We Govern and Are Governed—Director Independence.”
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation.
The following information is included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference:
•Information regarding HP’s compensation of its named executive officers is set forth under “Executive Compensation.”
•Information regarding HP’s compensation of its directors is set forth under “Corporate Governance—Governance and Board of Directors—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—How We Are Compensated—Director Compensation and Stock Ownership Guidelines.”
•The report of HP’s HR and Compensation Committee is set forth under “Executive Compensation—Management Proposal No. 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation—HR and Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation.”
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following information is included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference:
•Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners, directors and executive officers is set forth under “Ownership of Our Stock—Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”
•Information regarding HP’s equity compensation plans, including both stockholder approved plans and non-stockholder approved plans, is set forth in the section entitled “Executive Compensation—Management Proposal No. 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information.”
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The following information is included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference:
•Information regarding transactions with related persons is set forth under “Corporate Governance—Governance and Board of Directors—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—Related-Person Transactions Policies and Procedures—Fiscal 20192020 Related-Person Transactions.”
•Information regarding director independence is set forth under “Corporate Governance—Governance and Board of Directors—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—How We Govern and Are Governed—Director Independence.”
ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Information regarding principal accounting fees and services is set forth under “Audit Matters—Management Proposal No. 2 Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Principal Accounting Fees and Services” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
| |
(a) | The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1.All Financial Statements:
The following financial statements are filed as part of this report under Item 8—“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
| |
2. | Financial Statement Schedules: |
2.Financial Statement Schedules:
All schedules are omitted as the required information is not applicable or the information is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto in Item 8 above.
3.Exhibits:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit
Number
| | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| 2(a) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 2.1 | | November 5, 2015 |
| 2(b) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 2.2 | | November 5, 2015 |
| 2(d) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 2.4 | | November 5, 2015 |
| 3(a) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 3(a) | | June 12, 1998 |
| 3(b) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 3(b) | | March 16, 2001 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3(c) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 3.2 | | October 22, 2015 |
| 3(d) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 3.1 | | April 7, 2016 |
| 3(e) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 3.1 | | February 7,13, 2019 |
4(a)3(f) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 3.1 | | February 20, 2020 |
| 4(a) | | | | S-3 | | 333-215116 | | 4.1 | | December 15, 2016 |
| 4(b) | | | | S-3 | | 333-21516 | | 4.2 | | December 15, 2016 |
| 4(c) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 4.2 and 4.3 | | December 2, 2010 |
| 4(d) | | Form of Registrant’s 4.300% Global Note due June 1, 2021 and form of related Officers’ Certificate. | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | | | June 1, 2011 |
| 4(e) | | Form of Registrant’s 4.375% Global Note due September 15, 2021 and 6.000% Global Note due September 15, 2041 and form of related Officers’ Certificate. | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | | | September 19, 2011 |
| 4(f) | | Form of Registrant’s 4.650% Global Note due December 9, 2021 and related Officers’ Certificate. | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | | | December 12, 2011 |
| 4(g) | | Form of Registrant’s 4.050% Global Note due September 15, 2022 and related Officers’ Certificate. | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | | | March 12, 2012 |
| 4(h) | | | | 8-K/8-A/A | | 001-04423 | | 4.1 | | June 23, 2006 |
| 4(i) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 4(j) | | June 5, 2018 |
| 4(j) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 4(j) | | December 12, 2019 |
| 4(k) | | Rights Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2020, between HP Inc. and Equiniti Trust Company, as rights agent, which includes the form of Right Certificate as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares as Exhibit C. | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 4.1 | | February 20, 2020 | | 4(l) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 4.1 | | June 26, 2020 | | 4(m) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 4.1 | | June 17, 2020 | | 4(n) | | Form of 2.200% notes due 2025 and related Officers’ Certificate. | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | | | June 17, 2020 | | 4(o) | | Form of 3.000% notes due 2027 and related Officers’ Certificate. | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | | | June 17, 2020 | | 4(p) | | Form of 3.400% notes due 2030 and related Officers’ Certificate. | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | | | June 17, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exhibit
| | | | | | | | | | |
Number
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exhibit
Number | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date | | 10(a) | | | | S-8 | | 333-114253 | | 4.1 | | April 7, 2004 | | 10(b) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 10.2 | | September 21, 2006 | | 10(c) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 99.3 | | November 23, 2005 | | 10(d) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(h) | | December 14, 2011 | | 10(e) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(u)(u) | | June 13, 2002 | | 10(f) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(v)(v) | | June 13, 2002 | | 10(g) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 10.2 | | March 22, 2005 | | 10(h) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 10.2 | | January 24, 2008 | | 10(i) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(o)(o) | | March 10, 2008 | | 10(j) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(p)(p) | | March 10, 2008 | | 10(k) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(t)(t) | | June 6, 2008 | | 10(1) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(u)(u) | | June 6, 2008 | | 10(m) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(y)(y) | | December 18, 2008 | | 10(n) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(b)(b)(b) | | March 10, 2009 | | 10(o) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(i)(i)(i) | | December 15, 2010 | | 10(p) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(j)(j)(j) | | December 15, 2010 | | 10(q) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(k)(k)(k) | | December 15, 2010 | | 10(r) | | | | 8-K | | 001-04423 | | 10.2 | | March 21, 2013 | | 10(s) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(u)(u) | | March 11, 2014 | | 10(t) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(v)(v) | | March 11, 2014 | | 10(u) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(w)(w) | | March 11, 2014 | | 10(v) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(x)(x) | | March 11, 2014 | | 10(w) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(y)(y) | | March 11, 2014 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exhibit
Number
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date | | 10(x) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(z)(z) | | March 11, 2014 | | 10(y) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(a)(a)(a) | | March 11, 2014 | | 10(z) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(b)(b)(b) | | March 11, 2014 | | 10(a)(a) | | | | 10-K10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(c)(c)(c) | | March 11, 2015 | | 10(b)(b) | | | | 10-K10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(d)(d)(d) | | March 11, 2015 | | 10(c)(c) | | | | 10-K10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(e)(e)(e) | | March 11, 2015 | | 10(d)(d) | | | | 8-K10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(f)(f)(f) | | March 11, 2015 | | 10(e)(e) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(g)(g)(g) | | March 11, 2015 | | 10(f)(f) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(h)(h)(h) | | March 11, 2015 | | 10(g)(g) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(i)(i)(i) | | March 11, 2015 | | 10(h)(h) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(b)(b)(b) | | June 8, 2015 | | 10(i)(i) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(c)(c)(c) | | June 8, 2015 | | 10(j)(j) | | Second Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of April 2, 2014, as Amended and Restated as of November 1, 2015, among the Registrant, the lenders named therein and Citibank, N.A., as administrative processing agent and co-administrative agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-administrative agent.** | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10.(j)(j) | | June 5, 2018 | | 10(k)(k) | | Amendment No. 1, dated March 1, 2019 to Second Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of April 2, 2014, as Amended and Restated as of November 1, 2015, as further Amended and Restated as of March 30, 2018, among the Registrant, the lenders named therein and Citibank, N.A., as administrative processing agent and co-administrative agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-administrative agent. | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(k)(k) | | March 5, 2019 | | 10(l)(l) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(e)(e)(e) | | December 16, 2015 | | 10(m)(m) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(f)(f)(f) | | December 16, 2015 | | 10(n)(n) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(g)(g)(g) | | December 16, 2015
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exhibit
Number
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date | | 10(o)(o) | | | | 10-K/A | | 001-04423 | | 10(n)(n) | | December 15, 2017 | | 10(p)(p) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(o)(o)10(p)(p) | | March 3, 20165, 2020 | | 10(q)(q) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(p)(p) | | March 3, 2016 | | 10(r)(r) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(q)(q) | | March 3, 2016 | | 10(s)(s) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(r)(r) | | March 3, 2016 | | 10(t)(t) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(s)(s) | | March 3, 2016 | | 10(u)(u) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(t)(t) | | March 3, 2016 | | 10(v)(v) | | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(u)(u) | | December 15, 2016 | | 10(w)(w) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(v)(v) | | March 2, 2017 | | 10(x)(x) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(w)(w) | | March 2, 2017 | | 10(y)(y) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(x)(x)
| | March 2, 2017 | | 10(z)(z) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(y)(y)
| | March 2, 2017 | | 10(a)(a)(a) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(z)(z)
| | March 2, 2017 | | 10(b)(b)(b) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(a)(a)(a) | | March 2, 2017 | | 10(c)(c)(c) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(b)(b)(b) | | March 1, 2018 | | 10(d)(d)(d) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(c)(c)(c) | | March 1, 2018 | | 10(e)(e)(e) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(d)(d)(d) | | March 1, 2018 | | 10(f)(f)(f) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(e)(e)(e) | | March 1, 2018 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exhibit
Number
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date | | 10(g)(g)(g) |
| | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(f)(f)(f) | | March 1, 2018 | | 10(h)(h)(h) |
| | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(g)(g)(g) | | December 13, 2018 | | 10(i)(i)(i) |
| | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(h)(h)(h) | | December 13, 2018 | | 10(j)(j)(j) |
| | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10.(j)(j)(j) | | March 5, 2019 | | 10(k)(k)(k) |
| | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10.(k)(k)(k) | | March 5, 2019 | | 10(l)(l)(l) |
| | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10.(l)(l)(l) | | August 29, 2019 | | 10(m)(m)(m) |
| | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(m)(m)(m) | | December 12, 2019 | | 10(n)(n)(n) |
| | | | 10-K | | 001-04423 | | 10(n)(n)(n) | | December 12, 2019 | 2110(o)(o)(o) |
| | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(m)(m)(m) | | March 5, 2020 | | 10(p)(p)(p) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(n)(n)(n) | | March 5, 2020 | | 10(q)(q)(q) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(o)(o)(o) | | March 5, 2020 | | 10(r)(r)(r) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(p)(p)(p) | | March 5, 2020 | | 10(s)(s)(s) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(q)(q)(q) | | March 5, 2020 | | 10(t)(t)(t) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(r)(r)(r) | | June 5, 2020 | | 10(u)(u)(u) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(s)(s)(s) | | June 5, 2020 | | 10(v)(v)(v) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(t)(t)(t) | | June 5, 2020 | | 10(w)(w)(w) | | | | 10-Q | | 001-04423 | | 10(u)(u)(u) | | June 5, 2020 | | 10(x)(x)(x) | | | | | | | | | | | | 10(y)(y)(y) | | | | | | | | | | | | 21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 23 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 24Exhibit
Number |
| | | Incorporated by Reference | | 24 | | | Power of Attorney (included on the signature page). | | | | | | | | | | 31.1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 31.2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 32 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 101.INS |
| | XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.† | | | | | | | | | | 101.SCH |
| | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.† | | | | | | | | | | 101.CAL |
| | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.† | | | | | | | | | | 101.DEF |
| | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.† | | | | | | | | | | 101.LAB |
| | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.† | | | | | | | | | | 101.PRE |
| | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.† | | | | | | | | | | 104 |
| | The cover page from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019,2020, formatted in Inline XBRL (included within the Exhibit 101 attachments).† | | | | | | | | |
* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
** Certain schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Registration S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule and/or exhibit will be furnished supplementally to the SEC upon request. † Filed herewith. †† Furnished herewith.
The registrant agrees to furnish to the Commission supplementally upon request a copy of (1) any instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed herewith as to which the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and (2) any omitted schedules to any material plan of acquisition, disposition or reorganizationagreements set forth above.
SIGNATURES
| | | | Date: December 12, 2019 | HP INC. | | By: | /s/ STEVE FIELER | | | Steve Fieler
Chief Financial Officer
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steve Fieler, Kim Rivera and Ruairidh Ross, or any of them, his or her attorneys-in-fact, for such person in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report and to file the same, with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that either of said attorneys-in-fact, or substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. | | | | | | Signature | | Title(s) | | Date | /s/ ENRIQUE LORES | | President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
| | December 12, 2019 | Enrique Lores | | | | | | | | | | /s/ STEVE FIELER | | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
| | December 12, 2019 | Steve Fieler | | | | | | | | | | /s/ CLAIRE BRAMLEY | | Global Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
| | December 12, 2019 | Claire Bramley | | | | | | | | | | /s/ AIDA ALVAREZ | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Aida Alvarez | | | | | | | | | | /s/ SHUMEET BANERJI | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Shumeet Banerji | | | | | | | | | | /s/ ROBERT R. BENNETT | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Robert R. Bennett | | | | | | | | | | /s/ CHARLES V. BERGH | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Charles V. Bergh | | | | | | | | | | /s/ STACY BROWN-PHILPOT | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Stacy Brown-Philpot | | | | | | | | | | /s/ STEPHANIE BURNS | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Stephanie Burns | | | | | | | | | | /s/ MARY ANNE CITRINO | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Mary Anne Citrino | | | | | | | | | | /s/ YOKY MATSUOKA | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Yoky Matsuoka | | | | | | | | | | /s/ STACEY MOBLEY | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Stacey Mobley | | | | | | | | | | /s/ SUBRA SURESH | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Subra Suresh | | | | | | | | | | /s/ DION WEISLER | | Director | | December 12, 2019 | Dion Weisler | | | | |
ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. | | | | | | | | | | Date: December 10, 2020 | HP INC. | | By: | /s/ MARIE MYERS | | | Marie Myers Acting Chief Financial Officer |
POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Marie Myers, Kim Rivera and Ruairidh Ross, or any of them, his or her attorneys-in-fact, for such person in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report and to file the same, with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that either of said attorneys-in-fact, or substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signature | | Title(s) | | Date | | /s/ ENRIQUE LORES | | President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) | | December 10, 2020 | | Enrique Lores | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ MARIE MYERS | | Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) | | December 10, 2020 | | Marie Myers | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ CLAIRE BRAMLEY | | Global Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) | | December 10, 2020 | | Claire Bramley | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ AIDA ALVAREZ | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Aida Alvarez | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ SHUMEET BANERJI | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Shumeet Banerji | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ ROBERT R. BENNETT | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Robert R. Bennett | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ CHARLES V. BERGH | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Charles V. Bergh | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ STACY BROWN-PHILPOT | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Stacy Brown-Philpot | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ STEPHANIE BURNS | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Stephanie Burns | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ MARY ANNE CITRINO | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Mary Anne Citrino | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ RICHARD L. CLEMMER | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Richard L. Clemmer | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ YOKY MATSUOKA | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Yoky Matsuoka | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ STACEY MOBLEY | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Stacey Mobley | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ SUBRA SURESH | | Director | | December 10, 2020 | | Subra Suresh | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
