Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549 
Form 10-K
 
(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 20162018
or 
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                     to                     
Commission file number 000-04065
   
Lancaster Colony Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
  
Ohio 13-1955943
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
37 West Broad Street380 Polaris Parkway, Suite 400
Columbus,Westerville, Ohio
 4321543082
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 614-224-7141 
 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) 
   
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 
 
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, without par value NASDAQ Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x¨


Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one.)
Large accelerated filerx Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes  ¨    No  x
The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the price at which such Common Stock was last sold as of December 31, 20152017 was $2,138.9$2,415.3 million.
As of August 4, 2016,2, 2018, there were 27,423,69327,490,006 shares of Common Stock, without par value, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed for its November 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
   
 
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
  
 
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
  
 
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
  
 
Item 15.

PART I

Item 1. Business
GENERAL
Lancaster Colony Corporation, an Ohio corporation, is a manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for the retail and foodservice channels. We began our operations in 1961 as a Delaware corporation. In 1992, we reincorporated as an Ohio corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 37 West Broad Street, Columbus,380 Polaris Parkway, Suite 400, Westerville, Ohio 4321543082 and our telephone number is 614-224-7141.
In recent years, our strategy has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in our Specialty Foods business. Consistent with this strategy, on January 30, 2014, we sold effectively all of the net operating assets of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations. This sale marked the divestiture of our last remaining non-food business. The financial results of these operations for 2014, previously included in our Glassware and Candles segment, are reported as discontinued operations.
As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and except as the context otherwise may require, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “registrant,” or “the Company” mean Lancaster Colony Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where it is clear that the term only means the parent company. Unless otherwise noted, references to “year” pertain to our fiscal year which ends on June 30; for example, 20162018 refers to fiscal 2016,2018, which is the period from July 1, 20152017 to June 30, 2016.2018.
Available Information
Our Internet web site address is http://www.lancastercolony.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information contained on our web site or connected to it is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
DESCRIPTION OF AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT BUSINESS SEGMENTSEGMENTS
We operateEffective July 1, 2017, David A. Ciesinski, our President and Chief Operating Officer, succeeded John B. Gerlach, Jr. as our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). As President and CEO, Mr. Ciesinski became our principal executive officer and chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). This change resulted in onemodifications to the CODM’s approach to managing the business, assessing performance and allocating resources. Consequently, beginning on July 1, 2017, our segment – “Specialty Foods.”reporting structure was amended to align with these changes, and our financial results are now presented as two reportable segments: Retail and Foodservice. Costs that are directly attributable to either Retail or Foodservice are charged directly to the appropriate segment. Costs that are deemed to be indirect, excluding corporate expenses and other unusual significant transactions, are allocated to the two reportable segments using a reasonable methodology that is consistently applied. All historical information was retroactively conformed to the current presentation. These segment changes had no effect on previously reported consolidated net sales, operating income, net income or earnings per share. The financial information relating to our business segmentsegments for the three years ended June 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 is included in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, and located in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Further description of theeach business segment within which we operate is provided below.
Specialty FoodsRetail Segment
The following table presents the primary foodRetail products we manufacture and sell under our brand names:
Food Products Brand Names
Salad dressings and saucesFrozen Breads Marzetti, Marzetti Simply Dressed, Cardini’s, Girard’s, Katherine’s Kitchen
Vegetable dips and fruit dipsMarzetti
Frozen garlic breads New York BRAND Bakery Mamma Bella, Mamma Bella’s
Frozen Parkerhouse style yeast rolls and dinner rolls Sister Schubert’s Mary B’s
Premium dry egg noodlesRefrigerated Dressings, Dips and Other Inn Maid, Amish Kitchen
Frozen specialty noodlesSalad dressings Reames, Aunt Vi’sMarzetti, Simply Dressed, Simply 60
Vegetable dips and fruit dipsMarzetti
Flatbread wraps and pizza crustsFlatout
Sprouted grain bakery productsAngelic Bakehouse
Shelf-Stable Dressings and Croutons
Salad dressingsMarzetti, Cardini’s, Girard’s
Croutons and salad toppings New York BRAND Bakery, New York BRAND Bakery Texas Toast, Chatham Village, Cardini’s, Marzetti Simply Dressed, Marzetti
Flatbread wraps and pizza crustsFlatout
CaviarRomanoff
We also manufacture and sell other products pursuant to brand license agreements including Olive Garden® dressing, Jack Daniel’sdressings and Buffalo Wild Wings® mustards and Hungry Girl® flatbreads. Asauces. Additionally, a small portion of our Retail sales are products sold under private label to retailers, distributors and restaurants primarily in the United States. Additionally, a small portion of our sales are dressing packets, frozen specialty noodles, pasta and flatbreads sold to industrial customers for use as ingredients or components in their products.retailers.

Sales are made to retail and foodservice channels. The vast majority of the products we sell in the retail and foodservice channelsRetail segment are sold primarily through sales personnel, food brokers and distributors.distributors in the United States. We have strong placement of products in U.S. grocery produce departments through our refrigerated salad dressings, vegetable dips and fruit dips,dips. Our flatbread products and croutons. Our flatbreadsprouted grain bakery products are generally placed in the specialty bakery/deli section of the grocery store. We also have products typically marketed in the shelf-stable section of the grocery aisles involving shelf-stablestore, which include salad dressing, slaw dressing dry egg noodles and croutons. Within the frozen aislesfood section of the grocery retailers,store, we also have prominent market positions of frozen yeast rolls and garlic breads and egg noodles. Products we sell in the foodservice channel are often custom-formulated and include salad dressings, sandwich and dipping sauces, frozen breads and yeast rolls.breads.
Net sales attributable to McLane Company, Inc. (“McLane”), a wholesale distribution subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., totaled 19%, 18% and 18% of consolidated net sales for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Net sales attributable to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) totaled 16%, 16% and 17% of consolidated net sales for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. No other customerOur top five Retail customers accounted for more than 10%55%, 54% and 54% of ourthis segment’s total net sales during these years. Although we have the leading market share in several product categories, all of the markets in which we sell food products are highly competitive in the areas of price, quality2018, 2017 and customer service.2016, respectively.
We continue to rely upon our strong retail brands, innovation expertise, geographic and channel expansion and customer relationships for future growth. Our category-leading retail brands and commitment to new product development helpshelp drive increased consumer demand in our retail channel. In the foodservice channel, we grow our business with established customers and pursue new opportunities by leveraging our culinary skills and experience to support the development of new products and menu offerings.Retail segment. Strategic acquisitions are also part of our future growth plans, with a focus on fit and value.
A significant portion of our product lines is manufactured at our 15 food plants located throughout the United States. Certain items are also manufactured and packaged by third parties located in the United States, Canada and Europe.
Efficient and cost-effective production remains a key focus. In 2015 we completed a significant processing capacity expansion at our Horse Cave, Kentucky dressing facility to help improve throughput and meet demand for our dressing products.
Our quarterly Retail sales are affected by seasonal fluctuations, primarily in the fiscal second quarter and the Easter holiday season when sales of certain frozen retail products tend to be most pronounced. Our quarterly Retail sales can also be affected by the timing of seasonal shipments of certain fruit dips between the first and second quarters. The impacts on working capital are not significant. We do not utilize any franchises or concessions. In addition to the owned and licensed trademarkstrademarked brands discussed above, we also own and operate under innumerable other intellectual property rights, including patents, copyrights, formulas, proprietary trade secrets, technologies, know-how processes and other unregistered rights. We consider our owned and licensed intellectual property rights to be essential to our Retail business.
Foodservice Segment
The majority of our Foodservice sales are products sold under private label to restaurants.
The following table presents the primary Foodservice products we manufacture and sell under our brand names:
ProductsBrand Names
Dressings and Sauces
Salad dressingsMarzetti, Simply Dressed
Frozen Breads and Other
Frozen garlic breadsNew York BRAND Bakery
Frozen Parkerhouse style yeast rolls and dinner rollsSister Schubert’s
Frozen pastaMarzetti Frozen Pasta
The vast majority of the products we sell in the Foodservice segment are sold through sales personnel, food brokers and distributors in the United States. Most of the products we sell in the Foodservice segment are custom-formulated and include salad dressings, sandwich and dipping sauces, frozen breads and yeast rolls.
Our top five Foodservice direct customers accounted for 64%, 68% and 69% of this segment’s total net sales in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Within our Foodservice segment, typically our largest direct customers are distributors that distribute our products primarily to foodservice national chain restaurant accounts.
In the Foodservice segment, sales growth results from general volume gains or geographic expansion of our established customer base, and we also grow our business with existing and new customers by leveraging our culinary skills and experience to support the development of new products and menu offerings.
The operations of this segment are not affected to any material extent by seasonal fluctuations. We do not utilize any franchises or concessions. We own and operate under innumerable intellectual property rights, including patents, copyrights, formulas, proprietary trade secrets, technologies, know-how processes and other unregistered rights. We consider our owned intellectual property rights to be essential to our Foodservice business.

NET SALES BY CLASS OF PRODUCTS
The following table sets forth business segment information with respect to the percentage of net sales contributed by each class of similar products that account for at least 10% of our consolidated net sales in any year from 20142016 through 2016:2018:
 2016 2015 2014
Specialty Foods     
Non-frozen69% 67% 65%
Frozen31% 33% 35%
 2018 2017 2016
Retail Segment:     
Frozen breads21% 21% 20%
Refrigerated dressings, dips and other18% 18% 18%
Shelf-stable dressings and croutons14% 14% 14%
Foodservice Segment:     
Dressings and sauces35% 36% 37%
Frozen breads and other12% 11% 11%
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The estimated amount spent during eachNet sales attributable to Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”) totaled 17%, 17% and 16% of consolidated net sales for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Net sales attributable to McLane Company, Inc. (“McLane”), a wholesale distribution subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., totaled 15%, 16% and 19% of consolidated net sales for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. McLane is a large, national distributor that sells and distributes our products to several of our foodservice national chain restaurant accounts, principally in the last three years onquick service, fast casual and casual dining channels. In general, these national chain restaurants have direct relationships with us for culinary research and development, activities determinedmenu development and production needs, but choose to buy our products through McLane, who acts as their distributor. McLane orders our products on behalf of these national chain restaurants, and we invoice McLane for these sales. The decline in accordancenet sales to McLane in both 2018 and 2017 was primarily attributed to the choice of certain national chain restaurants to switch to a different distributor. The decline for 2017 was also influenced by our targeted business rationalization efforts with generally accepted accounting principles was lesscertain national chain restaurants that began in mid-2016. No other direct customer accounted for more than 1%10% of consolidated net sales.sales during these years.
MANUFACTURING
The majority of our products are manufactured and packaged at our 16 food plants located throughout the United States. Most of these plants produce products for both the Retail and Foodservice segments. Efficient and cost-effective production remains a key focus as evidenced by our lean six sigma initiative. Certain items are also manufactured and packaged by third parties located in the United States, Canada and Europe.
BACKLOG
Orders are generally filled in threefive to seventen days. We do not view the amount of backlog at any particular point in time as a meaningful indicator of longer-term shipments.
COMPETITION
All of the markets in which we sell food products are highly competitive.competitive in the areas of price, quality and customer service. We face competition from a number of domestic and foreign manufacturers of various sizes and capabilities. We compete with competitor branded products, as well as an increasing presence of retailers’ store branded products. Our ability to compete depends upon a variety of factors, including the position of our branded goods within various categories, product quality, product innovation, promotional and marketing activity, pricing and our ability to service customers.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Our operations are subject to various federal, state and local environmental protection laws. Based upon available information, compliance with these laws and regulations did not have a material effect upon the level of capital expenditures, earnings or our competitive position in 20162018 and is not expected to have a material impact in 2017.2019.
EMPLOYEES AND LABOR RELATIONS
As of June 30, 20162018 we had 2,7002,900 employees, 21%20% of which are represented under various collective bargaining contracts. 7% of our employees are represented under a collective bargaining contract that expired on April 30, 2016. We are currently renegotiating this contract. 9%4% of our employees are represented under a collective bargaining contract that will expire within one year. While we believe that labor relations with all our employees are satisfactory, a prolonged labor dispute or an organizing attempt could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

FOREIGN OPERATIONS AND EXPORT SALES
Over 95% of our products are sold in the United States. Foreign operations and export sales have not been significant in the past and are not expected to be significant in the future based upon existing operations. We do not have any fixed assets located outside of the United States.
RAW MATERIALS
During 2016,2018, we obtained adequate supplies of raw materials and packaging. We rely on a variety of raw materials and packaging for the day-to-day production of our products, including soybean oil, various sweeteners, eggs, dairy-related products, flour, various films and plastic and paper packaging materials.
We purchase the majority of these materials on the open market to meet current requirements, but we also have some fixed-price contracts with terms generally one year or less. See further discussion in our “Risk Factors” section below and our contractual obligations disclosure in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”). Although the availability and price of certain of these materials are influenced by weather, disease and the level of global demand, we anticipate that future sources of supply for 2019 will generally be available and adequate for our needs.

Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock is subject to certain risks inherent in our business. Before making an investment decision, youinvestors should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If any of the following risks occur, our business, results of operations, financial condition and results of operationscash flows could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of our common stock could decline significantly.
Increases in the costs or limitations to the availability of raw materials we use to produce our products could adversely affect our business by increasing our costs to produce goods.
Our principal raw-material needs include soybean oil, various sweeteners, eggs, dairy-related products, flour, various films, plastic and paper packaging materials and water. Our ability to manufacture and/or sell our productsWe may be impairedsubject to business disruptions, product recalls or other claims for real or perceived safety issues regarding our food products.
We can be impacted by damage or disruption to our manufacturing or distribution capabilities, or toboth real and unfounded claims regarding the capabilitiessafety of our suppliersoperations, or contract manufacturers,concerns regarding mislabeled, adulterated, contaminated or spoiled food products. Any of these circumstances could necessitate a voluntary or mandatory recall due to factors that are harda substantial product hazard, a need to predict or beyond our control, such as adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, fire, terrorism, pandemics, strikeschange a product’s labeling or other events. Production of the agricultural commodities usedconsumer safety concerns. A pervasive product recall may result in our business may also be adversely affected by drought, water scarcity, temperature extremes, scarcity of suitable agricultural land, worldwide demand, livestock disease (for example, avian influenza), crop disease and/or crop pests.
We purchase a majority of our key raw materials on the open market. Our abilitysignificant loss due to avoid the adverse effects of a pronounced, sustained price increase in our raw materials is limited. We have observed increased volatility in the costs of manya recall, related legal claims, including claims arising from bodily injury or illness caused by our products, the destruction of product inventory, or lost sales due to product unavailability. A highly publicized product recall, whether involving us or any related products made by third parties, also could result in a loss of customers or an unfavorable change in consumer sentiment regarding our products or any category in which we operate. In addition an allegation of noncompliance with federal or state food laws and regulations could force us to cease production, stop selling our products or create significant adverse publicity that could harm our credibility and decrease market acceptance of our products. Any of these raw materials in recent years. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, we experienced a significant increase in our egg-based ingredient costs as a direct result of a highly pathogenic strain of avian influenza that affected the primary egg-producing region in the United States. This increase was very sudden and significant and it adversely affected our results for the fourth quarter of 2015 and first half of 2016. In the past, fluctuating petroleum prices have impacted our costs of resin-based packaging and our costs of inbound freight on all purchased materials.
We try to limit our exposure to price fluctuations for raw materials by periodically entering into longer-term, fixed-price contracts for certain raw materials, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in limiting our exposure to these price fluctuations. We may experience further increases in the costs of raw materials, and we may try to offset such cost increases with higher prices or other measures. However, we may be unable to successfully implement offsetting measures.

Such cost increases, as well as an inability to effectively implement additional measures to offset higher costs,events could have a material adverse effect on our business, and results of operations.
McLane, a foodservice distributor, is our largest customer and an adverse change in the financial condition of its business could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Additionally, theWhile we believe our insurance related to these matters is consistent with industry practice, any potential claim under our policies may exceed our insurance coverage, may be subject to certain exceptions or may not be honored fully, in a timely manner, or at all.
We may be subject to a loss of sales or a significant reduction in, our businessincreased costs due to adverse publicity or consumer concern regarding the safety, quality or healthfulness of food products, whether with the underlying foodservice customers could cause our sales and net income to decrease.
Our net sales to McLane represented 19% of consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2016. Our accounts receivable balance from McLane as of June 30, 2016 was $11.2 million. McLane is a large national distributor that sells and distributes our products, to severalcompeting products or other related food products.
We are highly dependent upon consumers’ perception of the safety, quality and possible dietary attributes of our foodservice national chain customers, principallyproducts. As a result, substantial negative publicity concerning one or more of our products, or other foods similar to or in the quick service and casual dining channels. In general, our foodservice national chain customers have direct relationships with us, but many choose to buysame food group as our products, through McLane, who acts as their distributor. McLane orderscould lead to lower demand for our products on behalfand/or reduced prices and lost sales. Substantial negative publicity, even when false or unfounded, could also hurt the image of our brands or cause consumers to choose other products or avoid categories in which we operate. Any of these customers and we invoice McLane for these sales. Thus, unfavorable changes in the financial condition of McLaneevents could have a material adverse effect on our profitability. In addition,business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Certain negative publicity regarding the lossfood industry or our products could also increase our cost of operations. The food industry has been subject to negative publicity concerning the health implications of genetically modified organisms, added sugars, trans fat, salt, artificial growth hormones, ingredients sourced from foreign suppliers and other supply chain concerns. Consumers may increasingly require that our products and processes meet stricter standards than are required by applicable governmental agencies, thereby increasing the cost of manufacturing our products. If we fail to adequately respond to any such consumer concerns, we could suffer lost sales and damage our brand image or significant reduction in our business with the underlying foodservice customers, or other disruptions, such as decreased consumer demand or stronger competition,reputation. Any of these events could also have a material adverse effect on our business, and results of operations. We believe thatoperations, financial condition and cash flows.

A disruption of production at certain manufacturing facilities could result in an inability to provide adequate levels of customer service.
Because we source certain products from single manufacturing sites and use third party manufacturers for significant portions of our relationship with McLane and the underlying foodservice customersproduction needs for certain products, it is good, but we cannot assurepossible that we will becould experience a production disruption that results in a reduction or elimination of the availability of some of our products. If we are not able to maintain these relationships. McLane and the underlying foodservice customers are not typically committed to long-term contractual obligations with us, and they may switch to other suppliers that offer lower prices, differentiated productsobtain alternate production capability in a timely manner, or customer service that McLane and/or the underlying foodservice customers perceive to be more favorable. In addition, changes in the general business model of McLane, or the underlying foodservice customers,on favorable terms, it could have ana negative impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, including the potential for long-term loss of product placement with various customers.
We are also subject to risks of other business disruptions associated with our dependence on production facilities and distribution systems. Natural disasters, terrorist activity or other unforeseen events could interrupt production or distribution and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Wal-Mart is our second largest customer and an adverse change in the financial condition of its business could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and cash flows. Additionally,flows, including the potential for long-term loss of or a significant reduction in, its business could causeproduct placement with our sales and net income to decrease.
Our net sales to Wal-Mart represented 16% of consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2016. Our accounts receivable balance from Wal-Mart as of June 30, 2016 was $16.6 million. While our relationship with Wal-Mart has been long-standing and believed to be good, we cannot assure that we will be able to maintain this relationship. Wal-Mart is not contractually obligated to purchase from us. In addition, changes in Wal-Mart’s general business model, such as reducing the shelf space devoted to the branded products we market, or devoting more shelf space to competing products, could adversely affect the profitability of our business with Wal-Mart, even if we maintain a good relationship. The loss of, or a significant reduction in, this business could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability. Unfavorable changes in Wal-Mart’s financial condition or other disruptions to Wal-Mart, such as decreased consumer demand or stronger competition, could also have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.customers.
Competitive conditions within our Retail and Foodservice markets could impact our sales volumes and operating profits.
Competition within all of our markets is intense and is expected to remain so.intense. Numerous competitors exist, many of which are larger than us in size. These competitive conditions could lead to significant downward pressure on the prices of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability.
Competitive considerations in the various product categories in which we sell are numerous and include price, product innovation, product quality, brand recognition and loyalty, effectiveness of marketing, promotional activity and the ability to identify and satisfyremain relevant to consumer preferences and trends. In order to protectmaintain our existing market share or capture increased market share among our retail and foodservice channels, we may decide to increase our spending on marketing and promotional costs, advertising and new product innovation. The success of marketing, advertising and new product innovation is subject to risks, including uncertainties about trade and consumer acceptance. As a result, any such increased expenditures we make may not maintain or enhance market share and could result in lower profitability.
We may be subject to product recallsWalmart is our largest Retail customer. The loss of, or other claims for mislabeled, adulterated, contaminateda significant reduction in, Walmart’s business, or spoiled food products.
Our resultsan adverse change in the financial condition of operationsWalmart, could be impacted by both real and unfounded claims regarding our products, our competitors’ products and our suppliers’ products. Under certain circumstances, we may need to recall some of our products if they are, or have the potential to be, mislabeled, adulterated or contaminated. Any of these circumstances could necessitateresult in a voluntary or mandatory recall due to a substantial product hazard, a need to change a product’s labeling or out of an abundance of caution for consumer safety. A pervasive product recall may have anmaterial adverse effect on our business, results of operations, duefinancial condition and cash flows.
Our net sales to Walmart represented 17% of consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2018. Our accounts receivable balance from Walmart as of June 30, 2018 was $20.1 million. While our relationship with Walmart has been long-standing and is believed to be good, it is important to recognize that we may not be able to maintain this relationship and Walmart is not contractually obligated to purchase from us. In addition, changes in Walmart’s general business model, such as reducing the shelf space devoted to the costsbranded products we market, or devoting more shelf space to competing products, could adversely affect the profitability of our business with Walmart, even if we maintain a recall, related legal claims, the destructiongood relationship. The loss of, product inventory, lost sales due to the unavailability of product for a period of time, or a loss of customersignificant reduction in, this business could have a material adverse effect on our sales and consumer sentiment. In addition, we may also be liable if any of our products causes bodily injury or illness.

Any claim or product recall could stem from, or resultprofitability. Unfavorable changes in noncompliance with federal or state food laws and regulations. Such an action could force us to stop selling our products and create significant adverse publicity that could harm our credibility and decrease market acceptance of our products.
If we are required to defend against a product liabilityWalmart’s financial condition or other claim, whetherdisruptions to Walmart, such as decreased consumer demand or not we are found liable under the claim, westronger competition, could incur substantial costs,also have a material adverse effect on our reputation could sufferbusiness, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
McLane is our customers might substantially reduce their existing or future orders from us.
Adverse publicity or consumer concern regarding the safety and quality of food products or health concerns, whether with our products or for food productslargest Foodservice customer. An adverse change in the same food group as our products, may result in the lossfinancial condition of sales.
We are highly dependent upon consumers’ perception of the safety, quality and possible dietary attributes of our products. As a result, substantial negative publicity concerning one or more of our products, or other foods similar to or in the same food group as our products, could lead to a loss of consumer confidence in our products, removal of our products from retailers’ shelves and/or reduced prices and sales of our products. Product quality issues, whether actual or perceived, or allegations of product contamination, even when false or unfounded, could hurt the image of our brands and cause consumers to choose other products. Furthermore, any product recall, whether our own or by a third party within one of our categories or due to real or unfounded allegations, could damage our brand image and reputation. Any of these eventsMcLane could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and financial condition.cash flows.
If we conduct operationsOur net sales to McLane represented 15% of consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2018. Our accounts receivable balance from McLane as of June 30, 2018 was $7.8 million. McLane is a large, national distributor that sells and distributes our products to several of our foodservice national chain restaurant accounts, principally in a market channel that suffers a loss in consumer confidencethe quick service, fast casual and casual dining channels. In general, these national chain restaurants have direct relationships with us for culinary research and development, menu development and production needs, but choose to buy our products through McLane, who acts as to the safety and quality of foodtheir distributor. McLane orders our products our business could be materially affected. The food industry has recently been subject to negative publicity concerning the health implications of GMOs, obesity, trans fat, diacetyl, artificial growth hormones, and bacterial contamination, such as salmonella and listeria. Consumers may increasingly require that foods meet stricter standards than are required by applicable governmental agencies, thereby increasing the cost of manufacturing such foods and ingredients. Developments in anyon behalf of these areas, including, but not limited to, a negative perception about our formulationsnational chain restaurants, and we invoice McLane for these sales. Thus, unfavorable changes in the financial condition of McLane could cause our operating results to differ materially from expected results. Any of these events could materially reduce our sales, materially increase our costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, the loss of, or significant reduction in our business with the underlying national chain restaurants, or other disruptions, such as decreased consumer demand or stronger competition, could also have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition.condition and cash flows. We believe that our relationship with McLane and the underlying national chain restaurants is good, but we cannot ensure that we will be able to maintain these relationships. McLane and the underlying national chain restaurants are not typically committed to long-term contractual obligations with us, and they may switch to other suppliers that offer lower prices, differentiated products or customer service that McLane and/or the underlying national chain restaurants perceive to be more favorable. In addition, changes in the general business model of McLane, or the underlying national chain restaurants, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

A single indirect national chain restaurant account represents a significant portion of our Foodservice segment sales. The loss of, or a significant reduction in this national chain restaurant’s business, or an adverse change in the financial condition of this national chain restaurant, could result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our net sales to a single national chain restaurant account, which are made indirectly through several foodservice distributors, represented 13% of consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2018. While our relationship has been long-standing and is believed to be very good, it is recognized that we may not be able to maintain this relationship in the future. We do not have any long-term purchase commitments, and we may be unable to continue to sell our products in the same quantities or on the same terms as in the past. The loss of, or a significant reduction in, this business could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability. Further, unfavorable changes in this national chain restaurant’s financial condition or other disruptions, such as decreased consumer demand or stronger competition, could also have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We rely on the performance of major retailers, mass merchants, wholesalers, food brokers, distributors and foodservice customers for the success of our business and, should they perform poorly or give higher priority to other brands or products, our business could be adversely affected.
Within our Retail and Foodservice segments, we sell our products principally to retail and foodservice channels, including traditional supermarkets, mass merchants, warehouse clubs, specialty food distributors, foodservice distributors and national chain restaurants. Poor performance by our customers or our inability to collect accounts receivable from our customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In addition, our future growth and profitability may be unfavorably impacted by recent changes in the competitive landscape for our Retail segment customers. As consolidation in the retail grocery industry continues and our retail customers also grow larger and become more sophisticated, they may demand improved efficiency, lower pricing, increased promotional programs, or specifically tailored products. Further, these customers are reducing their inventories and increasing their emphasis on private label products and other products holding top market positions. Traditional retail grocers are also being pressured by the growing presence of deep discount retailers that emphasize private label product offerings and lower price points. If we fail to use our sales and marketing expertise to maintain our category leadership positions to respond to these trends, or if we lower our prices or increase promotional support of our products and are unable to increase the volume of our products sold, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Furthermore, within our Retail segment, many of our customers offer competitor branded products and their own store branded products that compete directly with our products for shelf space and consumer purchases. Accordingly, there is a risk that these customers give higher priority or promotional support to their store branded products or to the products of our competitors or discontinue the use of our products in favor of their store branded products or other competing products. Failure to maintain our retail shelf space or priority with these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Likewise, our foodservice distributors often offer their own branded products that compete directly with our products.
Emerging channels such as online retailers and home meal kit delivery services also continue to evolve and impact both the retail and foodservice industries. Our presence in these emerging channels is currently underdeveloped and while we have plans to pursue future opportunities in these emerging channels, our ultimate success and the resulting impacts to our financial results is uncertain.
We rely on the value of the brands we sell, and the failure to maintain and enhance these brands could adversely affect our business.
We rely on the success of our well-recognized brand names. Maintaining and enhancing our brand image and recognition is essential to our long-term success, and maintaining license agreements under which we market and sell certain brands is important to our business. The failure to do either could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We seek to maintain and enhance our brands through a variety of efforts, including the delivery of quality products, extending our brands into new markets and new products and investing in marketing and advertising. The costs of maintaining and enhancing our brands, including maintaining our rights to brands under license agreements, may increase. These increased costs could have a material adverse impacteffect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and results of operations.cash flows.
We manufacture and sell numerous products pursuant to brand license agreements including without limitation Olive Garden® dressing, Jack Daniel’sdressings and Buffalo Wild Wings® mustards and Hungry Girl® flatbreads.sauces. We believe that our relationships with our brand licensors are good, but we cannot assureensure that we will maintain those relationships. Many of our brand license agreements can be terminated or not renewed at the option of the licensor upon short notice to us. The termination of our brand license agreements, the failure to renew our brand license

agreements on terms favorable to us, or the impairment of our relationship with our brand licensors could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability andbusiness, results of operations.operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In addition, we increasingly rely on electronic marketing, such as social media platforms and the use of online marketing strategies, to support and enhance our brands. This “e-commerce” marketplace is growing and evolving quickly and allows for the rapid dissemination of information regarding our brands by us and consumers. We may not be able to successfully adapt our marketing efforts to this rapidly changing marketplace, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, negative opinions or commentary posted online regarding our brands, regardless of their underlying merits or accuracy, could diminish the value of our brands and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Increases in the costs or limitations to the availability of raw materials we use to produce and package our products could adversely affect our business financial conditionby increasing our costs to produce goods.
Our principal raw-material needs include soybean oil, various sweeteners, eggs, dairy-related products, flour, water and results of operations.

We rely on the performance of major retailers, wholesalers, food brokers, distributors, foodservice customersvarious films, plastic and mass merchants for the success of our business, and should they perform poorly or give higher prioritypaper packaging materials. Our ability to other brands manufacture and/or products, our business could be adversely affected.
We sell our products may be impaired by damage or disruption to our manufacturing or distribution capabilities, or to the capabilities of our suppliers or contract manufacturers, due to factors that are hard to predict or beyond our control, such as adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, fire, terrorism, pandemics, strikes or other events. Production of the agricultural commodities used in our business may also be adversely affected by drought, water scarcity, temperature extremes, scarcity of suitable agricultural land, worldwide demand, changes in international trade arrangements, livestock disease (for example, avian influenza), crop disease and/or crop pests.
We purchase a majority of our key raw materials on the open market. Our ability to avoid the adverse effects of a pronounced, sustained price increase in our raw materials is limited. We have observed increased volatility in the costs of many of these raw materials in recent years, including 2018. In general, eggs have been our most volatile raw material over the past three years, principally due to retailan outbreak of avian influenza in late 2015 in the United States and foodservice channels, including traditional supermarkets, mass merchants, warehouse clubs, specialty food distributors, foodservice distributorscertain issues affecting egg production in Europe beginning in our second quarter of 2018.
Similarly, fluctuating petroleum prices and national restaurant chain accounts. Poor performancetransportation capacity have, from time to time, impacted our costs of resin-based packaging and our costs of inbound freight on all purchased materials. In 2018, we experienced dramatic changes in our freight costs due to several factors that placed constraints on our transportation capacity in the United States.
We try to limit our exposure to price fluctuations for raw materials by periodically entering into longer-term, fixed-price contracts for certain raw materials, but we cannot ensure success in limiting our major wholesalers, retailersexposure. We may experience further increases in the costs of raw materials, and we may try to offset such cost increases with higher prices or chains,other measures. However, we may be unable to successfully implement offsetting measures or our foodservice customers, or ourunable to do so in a timely manner. Such cost increases, as well as an inability to collect accounts receivable from our customers,effectively implement additional measures to offset higher costs, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The availability and cost of transportation for our products is vital to our success, and the loss of availability or increase in the cost of transportation could have an unfavorable impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition.condition and cash flows.
In addition,Our ability to obtain adequate and reasonably priced methods of transportation to distribute our products, including refrigerated trailers for many of our retail customers offer competitor branded and their own store branded products, that compete directly with our products for shelf space and consumer purchases. Accordingly, there is a risk that these customers may give higher priority or promotional supportkey factor to their store branded products or to the products of our competitors or discontinue the use of our productssuccess. Delays in favor of their store branded products or other competing products. Failure to maintain our retail shelf space or priority with these customerstransportation, including weather-related delays, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Increases in energy-related Further, higher fuel costs and increased line haul costs due to industry capacity constraints, customer delivery requirements and a more restrictive regulatory environment could also negatively affectimpact our business by increasing our costs to produce goods.
financial results. We are subjectoften required to volatility in energy-related costspay fuel surcharges that affectfluctuate with the costprice of producing and distributingdiesel fuel to third-party transporters of our products, including our petroleum-derived packaging materials. While energy costs have generally trended lower over the past several quarters,and such surcharges can be substantial. Any sudden andor dramatic increases in these typesthe price of diesel fuel would serve to increase our fuel surcharges and our cost of goods sold. If we were unable to pass higher freight costs to our customers in the form of price increases, those higher costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are subject to federal, state and local government regulations that could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our business operations are subject to regulation by various federal, state and local government entities and agencies. As a producer of food products for human consumption, our operations are subject to stringent production, packaging, quality, labeling and distribution standards, including regulations promulgated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Food Safety Modernization Act. We limitcannot predict whether future regulation by various federal, state and local governmental entities and agencies would adversely affect our exposure to price fluctuations in energy-related costs by periodically entering into longer-term, fixed-price contracts for natural gasbusiness, results of operations, financial condition and electricity supply to somecash flows.

In addition, our business operations and the past and present ownership and operation of our manufacturing facilities, but there canproperties, including idle properties, are subject to extensive and changing federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations pertaining to the discharge of materials into the environment, the handling and disposition of wastes (including solid and hazardous wastes) or otherwise relating to protection of the environment. Although most of our properties have been subjected to periodic environmental assessments, these assessments may be no assurancelimited in scope and may not include or identify all potential environmental liabilities or risks associated with any particular property. We cannot be certain that our environmental assessments have identified all potential environmental liabilities or that we will not incur material environmental liabilities in the future.
We cannot be successfulcertain that environmental issues relating to presently known matters or identified sites, or to other matters or sites will not require additional, currently unanticipated investigation, assessment or expenditures. If we do incur or discover any material environmental liabilities or potential environmental liabilities in fully limitingthe future, we may face significant remediation costs and find it difficult to sell or lease any affected properties.
We may require significant capital expenditures to maintain, improve or replace aging infrastructure and facilities, which could adversely affect our exposurecash flows.
Much of our infrastructure and facilities have been in service for many years, which may result in a higher level of future maintenance costs and unscheduled repairs. Further, our infrastructure and facilities may need to future price fluctuations.be improved or replaced to maintain or increase operational efficiency, sustain production capacity, or meet changing regulatory requirements. A significant increase in maintenance costs and capital expenditures could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, a failure to operate our facilities optimally could result in declining customer service capabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Manufacturing capacity constraints may have a material adverse effect on us.our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our current manufacturing resources may be inadequate to meet significantly increased demand for some of our food products. Our ability to increase our manufacturing capacity depends on many factors, including the availability of capital, steadily increasing consumer demand, equipment delivery, construction lead-times, installation, qualification, regulatory permitting and regulatory requirements. Increasing capacity through the use of third party manufacturers depends on our ability to develop and maintain such relationships and the ability of such third parties to devote additional capacity to fill our orders.
A lack of sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet demand could cause our customer service levels to decrease, which may negatively affect customer demand for our products and customer relations generally, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on us.our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, operating facilities at or near capacity may also increase production and distribution costs and negatively affect relations with our employees or contractors, which could result in disruptions in our operations.
A disruption of production at certain manufacturing facilities could result in an inability to provide adequate levels of customer service.
Because we source certain products from single manufacturing sites and use third party manufacturers for significant portions of our production needs for certain products, it is possible that we could experience a production disruption that results in a reduction or elimination of the availability of some of our products. Should we not be able to obtain alternate production capability in a timely manner, or on favorable terms, a negative impact on our results of operations could result, including the potential for long-term loss of product placement with various customers.
We are also subject to risks of other business disruptions associated with our dependence on production facilities and distribution systems. Natural disasters, terrorist activity or other unforeseen events could interrupt production or distribution and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, including the potential for long-term loss of product placement with our customers.
The availability and cost of transportation for our products is vital to our success, and the loss of availability or increase in the cost of transportation could have an unfavorable impact on our business and results of operations.
Our ability to obtain adequate and reasonably priced methods of transportation to distribute our products is a key factor to our success. A substantial portion of our products requires the use of refrigerated trailers for shipping. Delays in transportation, including weather-related delays, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further, increased line haul costs due to industry capacity constraints and high fuel costs could also negatively impact our financial results. We are often required to pay fuel surcharges that fluctuate with the price of diesel fuel to third-party transporters of our products. While diesel fuel prices have trended lower over the past several quarters, our fuel surcharges can be substantial. Accordingly, any sudden or dramatic increases in the price of diesel fuel would serve to increase our fuel surcharges and our cost of goods sold. If we were unable to pass those higher costs to our customers in the form of price increases, those higher costs could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our inability to successfully renegotiate collective bargaining contracts and any prolonged work stoppages could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We believe that our labor relations with employees under collective bargaining contracts are satisfactory, but our inability to negotiate the renewal of these contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Any prolonged work stoppages could also have an adverse effect on our results of operations. We are currently renegotiating the labor contract for our Bedford Heights, Ohio plant facility, which produces various garlic bread products.
Technology failures could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our business.
We increasingly rely on information technology systems to conduct and manage our business operations, including the processing, transmitting, and storing of electronic information. For example, our sales group and our production and distribution facilities utilize information technology to increase efficiencies and limit costs. Furthermore, a significant portion of the communications between our personnel, customers, and suppliers depends on information technology.technology and an uninterrupted and functioning infrastructure, including telecommunications. Our information technology systems may be vulnerable to a variety of interruptions due to events beyond our control, including, but not limited to, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures and other security issues. If we are unable to adequately protect against these vulnerabilities, our operations could be disrupted, or we may suffer financial damage or loss because of lost or misappropriated information.
Cyber attacks or other breaches of network or other information technology security could have an adverse effect on our business.business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Cyber attacks or other breaches of network or information technology security may cause equipment failures or disruptions to our operations. Our inability to operate our networks as a result of such events, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses. Cyber attacks, which include the use of malware, computer viruses and other means for disruption or unauthorized access, have increased in frequency, scope and potential harm in recent years. To date, we have not been subject to cyber attacks or other cyber incidents that, individually or in the aggregate, have been material to our operations or financial condition. While we believe we take reasonable steps to protect the security of our information relative to our perceived risks, our preventative actions may be insufficient to defend against a major cyber attack in the future. The costs associated with a major cyber attack could include increased expenditures on cyber security measures, lost revenues from

business interruption, litigation, regulatory fines and penalties and damage to our reputation. If we fail to prevent the theft of valuable information such as financial data, sensitive information about the Company and intellectual property, or if we fail to protect the privacy of customer, consumer and employee confidential data against breaches of network or information technology security, it could result in damage to our reputation and brand image, which could adversely impact our employee, customer and investor relations. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are While we believe our insurance related to these matters is consistent with industry practice, any potential claim under our policies may be subject to federal, state and local government regulations that could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our business operations are subject to regulation by various federal, state and local government entities and agencies. As a producer of food products for human consumption, our operations are subject to stringent production, packaging, quality, labeling and distribution standards, including regulations promulgated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Food Safety Modernization Act. We cannot predict whether future regulation by various federal, state and local governmental entities and agencies would adversely affect our business and results of operations.
In addition, our business operations and the past and present ownership and operation of our properties, including idle properties, are subject to extensive and changing federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations pertaining to the discharge of materials into the environment, the handling and disposition of wastes (including solid and hazardous wastes) or otherwise relating to protection of the environment. Although most of our properties have been subjected to periodic environmental assessments, these assessments may be limited in scope andcertain exceptions; may not includebe honored fully, in a timely manner, or identify all potential environmental liabilities or risks associated with any particular property. We cannot be certain that our environmental assessments have identified all potential environmental liabilities or that we will not incur material environmental liabilities in the future.
We cannot assure that environmental issues relating to presently known matters or identified sites or to other matters or sites will not require additional, currently unanticipated investigation, assessment or expenditures. If we do incur or discover any material environmental liabilities or potential environmental liabilities in the future,at all; and we may face significant remediation costs and find it difficultnot have purchased sufficient insurance to sell or lease any affected properties.

Increased government regulations to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions as a result of concern over climate change may result in increased compliance costs, capital expenditures and other financial obligations for us. We use significant amounts of water, natural gas, diesel fuel, and electricity in the manufacture and distribution of our products. Legislation or regulations affecting these inputs could affect our profitability. In addition, climate change legislation or regulations could affect our ability to procure needed commodities at costs and in quantities we currently experience and may require us to make additional unplanned expenditures.
We may incur liabilities related to multiemployer pension plans which could adversely affect our financial results.
We contribute to two multiemployer pension plans under certain collective bargaining contracts that provide pension benefits to employees and retired employees who are part of the plan. Generally, as a contributor, we are responsible for making periodic contributions to these plans. Our required contributions to these plans could increase, however, based upon a number of factors, including our ability to renegotiate collective bargaining contracts successfully, current and future regulatory requirements, the performance of the pension plan’s investments, the number of participants who are entitled to receive benefits from the plan, a shrinking contribution base as a result of the insolvency or withdrawal of other companies that currently contribute to these plans, the inability or failure of withdrawing companies to pay their withdrawal liability, low interest rates and other funding deficiencies. An increase in our required contributions to these plans could have acover all material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, if we choose to voluntarily withdraw from a plan, we would be responsible for our proportionate share of the plan’s underfunded vested liability. We currently estimate that our liability for a complete withdrawal from both plans could exceed $16 million. However, that amount can vary at any given time based upon a number of factors, including current and future regulatory requirements, the performance of the pension plan’s investments, the number of participants who are entitled to receive benefits from the plan, the number of other contributors who participate in or withdraw from the plan and whether the plan is terminated. These factors may cause our withdrawal liability to increase, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.losses.
We may not be able to successfully consummate proposed acquisitions or divestitures, and integrating acquired businesses may present financial, managerial and operational challenges.
We continually evaluate acquiringthe acquisition of other businesses that would strategically fit within our operations. If we are unable to consummate, successfully integrate and grow these acquisitions and to realize contemplated revenue growth, synergies and cost savings, our financial results could be adversely affected. In addition, we may, from time to time, divest businesses, product lines or other operations that are less of a strategic fit within our portfolio or do not meet our growth or profitability targets. As a result, our profitability may be impactedadversely affected by either gains or losses on the sales of divested assets or lost operating income or cash flows from those businesses.
We may incur asset impairment or restructuring charges related to acquired or divested assets, which may reduce our profitability and cash flows. Finally, a buyer’s inability to fulfill contractual obligations that were assigned as part of a divestiture, including those relating to customer contracts, could lead to future financial loss on our part. These potential acquisitions or divestitures present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including diversion of management attention from ongoing businesses, difficulty with integrating or separating personnel and financial and other systems, increased expenses, assumption of unknown liabilities, indemnities and potential disputes with the buyers or sellers.
Our inability to successfully renegotiate collective bargaining contracts and any prolonged work stoppages could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We believe that our labor relations with employees under collective bargaining contracts are satisfactory, but our inability to negotiate the renewal of any collective bargaining agreements, including the agreement at our Milpitas, California facility, which is currently scheduled to expire in December 2018, or any prolonged work stoppages could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We may incur liabilities related to multiemployer pension plans which could adversely affect our financial results.
Through 2017, we contributed to two multiemployer pension plans under certain collective bargaining agreements that provide pension benefits to employees and retired employees who are part of the plans. On January 21, 2017, the employees at our Bedford Heights, Ohio plant voted to ratify a new collective bargaining agreement that provided for our complete withdrawal from the multiemployer pension plan associated with that facility. At this time, we still contribute to a multiemployer pension plan related to our facility in Milpitas, California.   
Because we have withdrawn from the multiemployer pension plan associated with our Bedford Heights plant, we are no longer subject to risks associated with increased contributions with respect to this pension fund. Nonetheless, certain future events related to this pension fund could result in incremental pension-related costs; however, the likelihood of these events occurring is indeterminate at this time.  
As a contributor to the multiemployer pension plan associated with our Milpitas, California facility, we are responsible for making periodic contributions to this plan. Our required contributions to this plan could increase; however, any increase would be dependent upon a number of factors, including our ability to renegotiate the collective bargaining contract successfully, current and future regulatory requirements, the performance of the pension plan’s investments, the number of participants who are entitled to receive benefits from the plan, the contribution base as a result of the insolvency or withdrawal of other companies that currently contribute to this plan, the inability or failure of withdrawing companies to pay their withdrawal liability, low interest rates and other funding deficiencies. We may also be required to pay a withdrawal liability if we exit from this plan. While we cannot determine whether and to what extent our contributions may increase or what our withdrawal liability may be, we do not expect any payments related to this plan to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Increases in energy-related costs could negatively affect our business by increasing our costs to produce goods.
We are subject to volatility in energy-related costs that affect the cost of producing and distributing our products, including our petroleum-derived packaging materials. Furthermore, any sudden and dramatic increases in electricity or natural gas costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We limit our exposure to price fluctuations in energy-related costs by periodically entering into longer-term, fixed-price contracts for natural gas and electricity supply to some of our manufacturing facilities. However, due to the inherent variability of contractual terms and end dates, in addition to the extent to which the energy markets in which we operate have been deregulated to allow for contracted supply, we will retain some level of exposure to future price fluctuations for our energy-related costs.
The loss of the services of one or more members of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and results of operations.cash flows.
Our operations and prospects depend in large part on the performance of our senior management team, several of which are long-serving employees with significant knowledge of our business model and operations. Should we not be able to find qualified replacements for any of these individuals if their services were no longer available, our ability to manage our operations or successfully execute our business strategy may be materially and adversely affected.
Mr. Gerlach, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors, has a significant ownership interest in our Company.
As of June 30, 2016,2018, Mr. Gerlach owned or controlled 30% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Accordingly, Mr. Gerlach has significant influence on all matters submitted to a vote of the holders of our common stock, including the election of directors. Mr. Gerlach’s voting power may also may have the effect of discouraging transactions involving an actual or a potential change of control of our Company, regardless of whether a premium is offered over then-current market prices.
The interests of Mr. Gerlach may conflict with the interests of other holders of our common stock. This conflict of interest may have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

Anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.
Certain provisions of our charter documents, including provisions limiting the ability of shareholders to raise matters at a meeting of shareholders without giving advance notice and provisions classifying our Board of Directors, may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or influence our Board of Directors. This may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes of control or management, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock.
Additionally, Ohio corporate law contains certain provisions that could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control. The Ohio Control Share Acquisition Act found in Chapter 1701 of the Ohio Revised Code provides that certain notice and informational filings and a special shareholder meeting and voting procedures must be followed prior to consummation of a proposed “control share acquisition,” as defined in the Ohio Revised Code. Assuming compliance with the prescribed notice and information filings, a proposed control share acquisition may be accomplished only if, at a special meeting of shareholders, the acquisition is approved by both a majority of the voting power represented at the meeting and a majority of the voting power remaining after excluding the combined voting power of the “interested shares,” as defined in the Ohio Revised Code. The Interested Shareholder Transactions Act found in Chapter 1704 of the Ohio Revised Code generally prohibits certain transactions, including mergers, majority share acquisitions and certain other control transactions, with an “interested shareholder,” as defined in the Ohio Revised Code, for a three-year period after becoming an interested shareholder, unless our Board of Directors approved the initial acquisition. After the three-year waiting period, such a transaction may require additional approvals under this Act, including approval by two-thirds of our voting shares and a majority of our voting shares not owned by the interested shareholder. The application of these provisions of the Ohio Revised Code, or any similar anti-takeover law adopted in Ohio, could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock.
Also, our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 1,150,000 shares of Class B Voting Preferred Stock and 1,150,000 shares of Class C Nonvoting Preferred Stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of those shares without any further vote or action by the shareholders. The rights of the holders of our common stock may be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any Class B Voting Preferred Stock and Class C Nonvoting Preferred Stock that may be issued in the future. The Company could use these rights to put in place a shareholder rights plan, or “poison pill,” that could be used in connection with a bid or proposal of acquisition for an inadequate price.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.


Item 2. Properties
We use 1.81.9 million square feet of space for our operations. Of this space, 0.50.6 million square feet are leased. These amounts exclude facilities operated by third-party service providers.
The following table summarizes our principal manufacturing locations (including aggregation of multiple facilities) that:
LocationPrincipal Products ProducedBusiness Segment(s)Terms of Occupancy
Altoona, IAFrozen pastaRetail and FoodserviceOwned
Bedford Heights, OHFrozen breadsRetail and FoodserviceOwned
Columbus, OHSauces, dressings, dipsRetail and FoodserviceOwned
Cudahy, WISprouted grain bakery productsRetailOwned
Horse Cave, KYSauces, dressings, frozen rollsRetail and FoodserviceOwned
Luverne, ALFrozen rollsRetail and FoodserviceOwned
Milpitas, CASauces and dressingsRetail and FoodserviceOwned
Saline, MIFlatbread productsRetail and FoodserviceOwned
Wareham, MA (1)
CroutonsRetail and FoodserviceLeased
(1)Fully leased for terms expiring in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2024.

The following table summarizes our principal warehouses, which are considered the principal manufacturing and warehousing operations ofused to distribute products to our Specialty Foods segment:customers:
Location  Principal Products InvolvedBusiness Segment(s)  Terms of Occupancy
Altoona, IA (1)
  Frozen pastaRetail and Foodservice  Owned/Leased
Bedford Heights, OH (2)Attalla, AL  Frozen breadsRetail and Foodservice  Owned/LeasedThird-party service
Columbus, OH (2)
  Sauces, dressings, dips, distribution of frozen foodsRetail and Foodservice  Owned/Leased
Grove City, OH  Distribution of non-frozen foodsRetail and Foodservice  Owned
Horse Cave, KY Sauces, dressings, dips, frozen rollsRetail and Foodservice Owned
Luverne, AL
Milpitas, CA (3)
  Frozen rollsOwned
Milpitas, CA (3)SaucesRetail and dressingsOwned/Leased
Saline, MI (2)Flatbread wraps and pizza crustsOwned/Leased
Wareham, MA (4)CroutonsFoodservice  Leased
(1)PartFully leased for term expiring in fiscal 20202020.
(2)Part leased for term expiring in fiscal 2017
(3)Part leased for term expiring in fiscal 2021
(4)Fully leased for term expiring in fiscal 20192022.
(3)Fully leased for term expiring in fiscal 2021.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time we are a party to various legal proceedings. While we believe that the ultimate outcome of these various proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, litigation is always subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings could occur. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or an injunction prohibiting us from manufacturing or selling one or more products or could lead to us altering the manner in which we manufacture or sell one or more products, which could have a material impact on net income for the period in which the ruling occurs and future periods.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol LANC. The following table sets forth the high and low prices for Lancaster Colony Corporation common sharesstock and the dividends paid for each quarter of 20162018 and 2015.2017. Stock prices were provided by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.
Stock Prices Dividends Paid Per ShareStock Prices Dividends Paid Per Share
High Low  High Low  
2016     
First Quarter$101.63
 $89.62
 $0.46
Second Quarter (includes special dividend of $5.00 per share)$118.74
 $95.47
 5.50
Third Quarter$119.80
 $95.78
 0.50
Fourth Quarter$128.07
 $107.29
 0.50
Year    $6.96
     
2015     
2018     
First Quarter$97.44
 $84.48
 $0.44
$127.90
 $113.34
 $0.55
Second Quarter$96.95
 $81.96
 0.46
$135.86
 $116.25
 0.60
Third Quarter$96.43
 $86.85
 0.46
$132.35
 $115.81
 0.60
Fourth Quarter$97.77
 $87.23
 0.46
$141.58
 $118.91
 0.60
Year    $1.82
    $2.35
     
2017     
First Quarter$137.71
 $117.50
 $0.50
Second Quarter$143.67
 $125.71
 0.55
Third Quarter$149.30
 $125.82
 0.55
Fourth Quarter$131.79
 $119.38
 0.55
Year    $2.15
The number of shareholders of record as of August 4, 20162, 2018 was approximately 770. This is not the actual number of beneficial owners of our common stock, as shares are held in “street name” by brokers and others on behalf of individual owners. The highest and lowest prices for our common stock from July 1, 20162018 to August 4, 20162, 2018 were $132.06$147.59 and $124.90.$137.97.
We have increased our regular cash dividends for 5355 consecutive years. Future dividends will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other factors.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In November 2010, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of 2,000,000 common shares, of which 1,418,1521,402,219 common shares remained authorized for future repurchases at June 30, 2016.2018. This share repurchase authorization does not have a stated expiration date. In the fourth quarter, we did not repurchase any of our common stock.
Period
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans
 
Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet be
Purchased
Under the
Plans
April 1-30, 20162018
 $
 
 1,418,1521,402,219
May 1-31, 20162018
 $
 
 1,418,1521,402,219
June 1-30, 20162018
 $
 
 1,418,1521,402,219
Total
 $
 
 1,418,1521,402,219


PERFORMANCE GRAPH
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN
OF LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION, THE S&P MIDCAP 400 INDEX
AND THE DOW JONES U.S. FOOD PRODUCERS INDEX

The graph set forth below compares the five-year cumulative total return from investing $100 on June 30, 20112013 in each of our Common Stock, the S&P Midcap 400 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Food Producers Index. It is assumedThe total return calculation assumes that all dividends are reinvested, including any special dividends.

lanc-201663_chartx19589a02.jpg
 
Cumulative Total Return (Dollars)
 6/11 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15 6/16 6/13 6/14 6/15 6/16 6/17 6/18
Lancaster Colony Corporation 100.00 119.63 143.00 178.01 173.40 258.95 100.00 124.48 121.26 181.08 176.86 203.43
S&P Midcap 400 100.00 97.67 122.27 153.12 162.92 165.09 100.00 125.24 133.25 135.02 160.09 181.71
Dow Jones U.S. Food Producers 100.00 104.38 134.10 161.28 180.00 213.95 100.00 120.27 134.23 159.55 153.11 150.01
There can be no assurance that our stock performance will continue into the future with the same or similar trends depicted in the above graph.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
 
Years Ended June 30,Years Ended June 30,
(Thousands Except Per Share Figures)2016 2015 2014 2013 20122018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Operations                  
Net Sales (1)$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
 $1,013,803
 $988,937
$1,222,925
 $1,201,842
 $1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
Gross Profit (1)$299,629
 $257,692
 $248,568
 $244,707
 $223,428
$303,513
 $318,764
 $299,629
 $257,692
 $248,568
Percent of Net Sales25.2% 23.3% 23.9% 24.1% 22.6%24.8% 26.5% 25.2% 23.3% 23.9%
Multiemployer Pension Settlement and Related Costs$
 $17,635
 $
 $
 $
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes (1)$184,633
 $154,552
 $153,279
 $153,818
 $141,216
$174,203
 $175,516
 $184,633
 $154,552
 $153,279
Percent of Net Sales15.5% 14.0% 14.7% 15.2% 14.3%14.2% 14.6% 15.5% 14.0% 14.7%
Taxes Based on Income (1)$62,869
 $52,866
 $52,293
 $49,958
 $48,867
Income From Continuing Operations (1)$121,764
 $101,686
 $100,986
 $103,860
 $92,349
Taxes Based on Income (1) (4)
$38,889
 $60,202
 $62,869
 $52,866
 $52,293
Income From Continuing Operations (1) (4)
$135,314
 $115,314
 $121,764
 $101,686
 $100,986
Percent of Net Sales10.2% 9.2% 9.7% 10.2% 9.3%11.1% 9.6% 10.2% 9.2% 9.7%
Continuing Operations Diluted Net Income Per Common Share (1)$4.44
 $3.72
 $3.69
 $3.79
 $3.38
Continuing Operations Diluted Net Income Per Common Share (1) (4)
$4.92
 $4.20
 $4.44
 $3.72
 $3.69
Cash Dividends Per Common Share - Regular$1.96
 $1.82
 $1.72
 $1.52
 $1.41
$2.35
 $2.15
 $1.96
 $1.82
 $1.72
Cash Dividends Per Common Share - Special$5.00
 $
 $
 $5.00
 $
$
 $
 $5.00
 $
 $
                  
Financial Position                  
Total Assets (2)$634,732
 $702,156
 $627,301
 $606,260
 $669,467
$804,491
 $716,405
 $634,732
 $702,156
 $627,301
Property, Plant and Equipment-Net (1)$169,595
 $172,311
 $168,674
 $168,074
 $161,029
$190,813
 $180,671
 $169,595
 $172,311
 $168,674
Property Additions (1) (3)$16,671
 $18,298
 $15,645
 $23,460
 $15,506
$31,025
 $27,005
 $16,671
 $18,298
 $15,645
Depreciation and Amortization (1)$24,147
 $21,111
 $18,993
 $17,617
 $17,589
$26,896
 $24,906
 $24,147
 $21,111
 $18,993
Long-Term Debt$
 $
 $
 $
 $
$
 $
 $
 $
 $
Shareholders’ Equity$513,598
 $580,918
 $528,597
 $501,222
 $564,267
Shareholders’ Equity (4)
$652,282
 $575,977
 $513,598
 $580,918
 $528,597
Per Common Share$18.73
 $21.23
 $19.33
 $18.34
 $20.68
$23.73
 $20.98
 $18.73
 $21.23
 $19.33
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding-Diluted27,373
 27,327
 27,308
 27,285
 27,265
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding-Diluted (4)
27,459
 27,440
 27,373
 27,327
 27,308
 
(1)Amounts for 2012-20142014 exclude the impact of the discontinued Glassware & Candles segment operations.
(2)Certain prior-year balances were reclassified in 2016 to reflect the impact of the adoption of new accounting guidance about the presentation of deferred tax assets and liabilities. With the adoption, our net deferred tax liability for all periods presented has been classified as noncurrent.
(3)AmountAmounts for 2017 and 2015 excludesexclude property obtained in acquisitions ($5.1 million in the 2017 acquisition of Angelic Bakehouse and $6.9 million obtained in the Flatout acquisition.2015 acquisition of Flatout).
(4)Amounts for 2018 reflect the impact of the adoption of new accounting guidance for stock-based compensation, including the following provisions that were applied on a prospective basis: (a) the inclusion of the tax consequences related to stock-based compensation within the computation of income tax expense versus equity and (b) assumed proceeds used in the calculation of weighted average shares no longer include the amount of excess tax benefits. As a result, the amounts for 2018 may not be comparable to amounts for prior years.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted, references to “year” pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 20162018 refers to fiscal 2016,2018, which is the period from July 1, 20152017 to June 30, 2016.2018.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the “Selected Financial Data” in Item 6 and our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The forward-looking statements in this section and other parts of this report involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, including statements regarding our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and financial performance. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of factors set forth under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements” and those set forth in Item 1A.1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
OVERVIEW
Business Overview
Lancaster Colony Corporation is a manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for the retail and foodservice channels.
We previously manufacturedEffective July 1, 2017, David A. Ciesinski, our President and marketed candles forChief Operating Officer, succeeded John B. Gerlach, Jr. as our CEO. As President and CEO, Mr. Ciesinski became our principal executive officer and CODM. This change resulted in modifications to the food, drugCODM’s approach to managing the business, assessing performance and mass markets until that businessallocating resources. Consequently, beginning on July 1, 2017, our segment reporting structure was sold on January 30, 2014. Theamended to align with these changes, and our financial results of these operations for 2014,are now presented as two reportable segments: Retail and Foodservice. Costs that are directly attributable to either Retail or Foodservice are charged directly to the appropriate segment. Costs that are deemed to be indirect, excluding corporate expenses and other unusual significant transactions, are allocated to the two reportable segments using a reasonable methodology that is consistently applied. All historical information was retroactively conformed to the current presentation. These segment changes had no effect on previously included in our Glassware and Candles segment, are reported as discontinued operations.
In March 2015 we acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Flatout Holdings, Inc. (“Flatout”), a privately owned manufacturer and marketer of flatbread wraps and pizza crusts based in Saline, Michigan. The purchase price was $92.2 million,consolidated net of cash acquired. This transaction is discussed in further detail insales, operating income, net income or earnings per share. See Note 210 to the consolidated financial statements.statements for further information about our segments.
Our sales are predominately domestic.
Our business has the potential to achieve future growth in sales and profitability due to attributes such as:
leading Retail market positions in several product categories with a high-quality perception;
recognized innovation in Retail products;
a broad customer base in both Retail and Foodservice accounts;
well-regarded culinary expertise among Foodservice customers;
recognized leadership in Foodservice product development;
experience in integrating complementary business acquisitions; and
historically strong cash flow generation that supports growth opportunities.
Our goal is to grow both Retail and Foodservice segment sales over time by:
leveraging the strength of our Retail brands to increase current product sales;
introducing new products and expanding distribution; and
continuing to rely upon the strength of our reputation in Foodservice product development and quality.
Part of our future growth may result from acquisitions. We continue to review potential acquisitions that we believe will complement our existing product lines, enhance our profitability and/or offer good expansion opportunities in a manner that fits our overall strategic goals.
Our operations are organized into one reportable segment: “Specialty Foods.” Our sales are predominately domestic.
Our business hasConsistent with this acquisition strategy, in November 2016 we acquired substantially all of the potentialassets of Angelic Bakehouse, Inc. (“Angelic”), a manufacturer and marketer of premium sprouted grain bakery products based near Milwaukee, Wisconsin. This transaction is discussed in further detail in Note 2 to achieve future growth in sales and profitability due to attributes such as:
leading retail market positions in several product categories with a high-quality perception;
recognized innovation in retail products;
a broad customer base in both retail and foodservice accounts;
well-regarded culinary expertise among foodservice customers;
recognized leadership in foodservice product development;
experience in integrating complementary business acquisitions; and
historically strong cash flow generation that supports growth opportunities.
Our goal is to grow both retail and foodservice sales over time by:
leveraging the strength of our retail brands to increase current product sales;
introducing new retail products and expanding distribution;
growing our foodservice sales through the strength of our reputation in product development and quality; and
pursuing acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria.
In our retail channel, we utilize numerous branded products to support growth and maintain market competitiveness. We place great emphasis on our product innovation and development efforts to enhance growth by providing distinctive new products or extensions of our current product lines to meet the evolving needs and preferences of consumers.
Our foodservice sales primarily consist of products sold to restaurant chains, either directly or through distributors. Over the long-term, we have experienced broad-based growth in our foodservice sales, as we build on our strong reputation for product development and quality.consolidated financial statements.
We have made substantial capital investments to support our existing food operations and future growth opportunities. For example, in 2015 we completed a significant processingrecently expanded our warehousing capacity expansion at our Horse Cave, Kentucky dressing facilityAngelic to help meet anticipated growth in demand for our dressingsprouted grain bakery products. Based on our current plans and expectations, we believe our capital expenditures for 20172019 could total approximately $20between $60 and $80 million, which includes a substantial investment for a frozen dinner roll capacity expansion project that we expect to $22 million.complete in mid-2020. We anticipate we will be able to fund all of our capital needs in 20172019 with cash generated from operations.operations and cash on hand.

Summary of 20162018 Results
Consolidated net sales reached $1,191a record $1,223 million during 2016,2018, increasing by 8%2% as compared to prior-year net sales of $1,105$1,202 million, driven by increased retailwith both the Retail and foodservice volumes, pricing actions and the contribution from Flatout.

Foodservice segments contributing to this growth.
Gross profit increased 16%decreased 5% to $299.6$303.5 million from the prior-year total of $257.7$318.8 million. The increaseThis decline resulted from considerably higher sales, reduced commodity and freight costs, partially offset by supply chain savings realized from our lean six sigma program and pricing actions taken beginning in the third quarter of 2018 in response to the cost increases. The prior-year results reflected a notable benefit from significantly lower freight costs.ingredient costs in the first half of 2017 with only a modest offset from deflationary pricing.
NetIn 2018, net income totaled $135.3 million, or $4.92 per diluted share, including a one-time benefit of $9.5 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, for the re-measurement of our net deferred tax liability due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”). In 2017, net income totaled $115.3 million, or $4.20 per diluted share, including the multiemployer pension after-tax charge of $11.5 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, compared to $121.8 million, in 2016, or $4.44 per diluted share, compared to net income of $101.7 million, or $3.72 per diluted share, in 2015. Net income in 2014 totaled $75.0 million, or $2.74 per diluted share, which included an after-tax loss on the sale of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations of $29.1 million.2016.
Looking Forward
For 2017,2019, we expect volume-driven growth in our retail sales channelRetail segment with support from recent and upcoming new product introductions alongintroductions. We also anticipate continued progress with increased salesnet price realization from Flatout.the price increases that began in the second half of 2018 and better-optimized trade spending in the Retail segment. In the first half of 2017,Foodservice segment, we expect volume-drivenanticipate volume growth from continuing customers in our foodservice channel will be largely offset by the influence of lower pricing (due to lower commodity costs, particularly eggs)select national chain restaurant accounts and the impactdistributors of our customer rationalization initiative which beganbranded products, as well as continued benefits from Foodservice segment price increases that were implemented early in the third quarter of 2016.2018.
We will also continue to consider acquisition opportunities that are consistent with our growth strategy and represent good value or otherwise provide significant strategic benefits.
Among the many factors that may impact our ability to improve sales and operating margins in the coming year are the success of our continued investment in innovation and new products, growth from Flatout andexisting product lines, the level of net price realization in the Retail segment and the extent of efficiency gains we ultimately achieveand cost savings resulting from our supply chainlean six sigma program and other cost-savingsupply chain initiatives.
Based on current market conditions, commodity costs are projected to remain unfavorable in fiscal 2019, although to a lesser extent than we foresee modestly favorable material cost comparisonsexperienced in fiscal 2018. Freight costs are also expected to persist as a headwind through the first half of 2017, due mainlythe fiscal year. We have initiatives in place or planned for both the short- and long-term to the impact of lower eggaddress these higher freight and commodity costs and continued favorable trends in certain other key commodities. However, in the second half of 2017, we anticipateincluding pricing actions, a more neutral pricing environment as we anniversary many comparisons on various key ingredients.optimized distribution network and tactical procurement. Future changes in ingredient costs, as well as other material costs, will be influenced by the size of agricultural harvests in both the U.S.United States and other parts of the world and related global demand, economic conditions, tariffs and the regulatory environment.
Overall, we continue to limit some of our exposure to volatile swings in food commodity costs through a structured forward purchasing program for certain key materials such as soybean oil and flour. For a more-detailed discussion of the effect of commodity costs, see the “Impact of Inflation” section of this MD&A below. Changes in other notable recurring costs, such as marketing, transportation, and production costs and introductory costs for new products, may also impact our overall results.
The Tax Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017 with an effective date of January 1, 2018. Most notably, the Tax Act reduced the statutory federal income tax rate for corporations from 35% to 21%. The statutory federal income tax rate for our 2019 tax return will be 21%, a reduction from the blended rate of 28.1% for our 2018 federal tax return. We expect an overall effective tax rate of approximately 24% for 2019.
We will adopt new accounting guidance for revenue recognition on July 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. However, there will be additional required disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements upon adoption. See further discussion in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
We will adopt new accounting guidance for changes in the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost on July 1, 2018. The amendments will require retrospective application for the income statement presentation provisions. We expect only changes in classification on the income statement. See further discussion in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
We will continue to periodically reassess our allocation of capital to ensure that we maintain adequate operating flexibility while providing appropriate levels of cash returns to our shareholders.

RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Segment Sales Mix
The relative proportion of sales contributed by each of our business segments can impact a year-to-year comparison of the consolidated statements of income. The following table summarizes the sales mix over each of the last three years:
 2018 2017 2016
Segment Sales Mix:     
Retail53% 53% 52%
Foodservice47% 47% 48%
Net Sales and Gross Profit
Year Ended June 30, ChangeYear Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
 $86,595
 8% $63,439
 6%             
Retail$650,234
 $641,417
 $619,384
 $8,817
 1 % $22,033
 4 %
Foodservice572,691
 560,425
 571,725
 12,266
 2 % (11,300) (2)%
Total$1,222,925
 $1,201,842
 $1,191,109
 $21,083
 2 % $10,733
 1 %
Gross Profit$299,629
 $257,692
 $248,568
 $41,937
 16% $9,124
 4%$303,513
 $318,764
 $299,629
 $(15,251) (5)% $19,135
 6 %
Gross Margin25.2% 23.3% 23.9%        24.8% 26.5% 25.2%        
In March 2015November 2016, we acquired FlatoutAngelic and its results of operations have been included in the Retail segment within our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Flatout contributed approximately $42 million in net sales
2018 to our 2016 results. Flatout net sales were not material to our consolidated financial statements in 2015, with Flatout contributing $13 million in net sales.
2016 to 20152017
Consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 20162018 increased 8%2% to a new record of $1,191$1,223 million from the prior-year record total of $1,105$1,202 million. This growth was driven by increases in both Retail and Foodservice net sales and resulted from pricing actions, which were taken during the contributionsecond half of 2018 in response to higher freight and commodity costs, as well as reduced retail trade spending and lower coupon expense. Our sales volume, as measured by pounds shipped, was essentially flat. Retail net sales represented 53% of total net sales in both 2018 and 2017.
Our gross margin declined to 24.8% in 2018 compared to 26.5% in 2017 due to the impact of increased commodity costs, most notably eggs, as well as soybean oil, flour and dairy ingredients, and higher freight costs. The increase in freight costs resulted from Flatout,several factors adversely affecting transportation capacity within the United States, including severe weather, rising diesel fuel costs, new regulations, driver availability and a growing U.S. economy. These increased retail and foodservice volumescosts were partially offset by supply chain savings realized from our lean six sigma program and pricing actions. Ouractions taken in our Retail and Foodservice segments primarily in the second half of 2018. Excluding the impact of pricing, total raw-material costs were estimated to have negatively affected our gross margins by 1% of net sales. We estimate higher freight costs to have negatively affected our gross margins by nearly 1% of net sales. The prior-year results reflected a notable benefit from significantly lower ingredient costs in the first half of 2017 with only a modest offset from deflationary pricing.
2017 to 2016
Consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2017 increased 1% to a then record of $1,202 million from the prior-year record total of $1,191 million. This growth was driven by higher Retail net sales as partially offset by lower Foodservice net sales. Excluding Angelic, our overall sales volume, as measured by pounds shipped, improved by 5%1%. Pricing actions were taken in response to significantly higher egg costs incurred in our first half. In general, thehad a net deflationary impact of higher pricing represented more thannearly 1% of net sales for 2016.
Retail net sales increased 10% due to the addition of Flatout and higher sales of certain product lines including Olive Garden® retail dressings and Marzetti® refrigerated dressings, including Simply Dressed®. Foodservice net sales improved 6% as demand from national chain restaurants remained strong.2017. As a percentage of total net sales, retailRetail net sales increased slightly to 52%53% from 51% in 2015.
Excluding sales contributed by Flatout, consolidated net sales increased 5%52% in 2016.

Our gross margin increased to 26.5% in 2017 compared with 25.2% in 2016 compared with 23.3% in 2015 due to the influence of our netoverall lower raw-material costs, primarily for eggs, but also for flour, honey and certain packaging materials. Margins also benefited from a more favorable sales mix, partially offset by higher retail trade spending and deflationary pricing actions and lower commodity and freight costs. The significantly higher egg costs attributed to the avian influenza outbreak we experienced in the first half of the year were more than offset by lower costs of certain other raw materials throughout the year, specifically soybean oil, dairy-based products, flour and resin packaging.Foodservice segment. Excluding any pricing actions, total raw-material costs were estimated to have positively affected our gross margins by less than 1%2% of net sales.
2015 to 2014
Consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2015 increased 6% to a then record of $1,105 million from the prior-year record total of $1,041 million. This growth was primarily driven by volume and mix. Retail net sales increased 6% due to higher sales of New York BRAND® frozen garlic bread and Olive Garden® retail dressings and the impact of Flatout, but were offset in part by increased promotional spending on some retail product offerings and placement costs for new products. Foodservice net sales also improved 6% primarily due to increased sales to national chain restaurants. Our overall sales volume, as measured by pounds shipped, improved by 5%. Incremental net sales from Flatout accounted for less than 1% of the volume increase. The influence of a more favorable sales mix was estimated to be less than 1%. The net impact of pricing for both retail and foodservice was insignificant. As a percentage of net sales, sales of retail products remained relatively unchanged at 51%.
Our gross margin declined to 23.3% in 2015 compared with 23.9% in 2014 as the benefits from the improved sales volumes and modestly lower material costs were offset by increased operating costs due to capacity constraints in our dressing manufacturing, higher freight expense, increased placement costs for new products and certain nonrecurring charges related to Flatout. The higher levels of operating inefficiencies were most pronounced during the first half of 2015. We estimate that lower ingredient costs beneficially affected our gross margins by less than 1% of net sales.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Year Ended June 30, ChangeYear Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
SG&A Expenses$115,059
 $102,831
 $94,801
 $12,228
 12% $8,030
 8%$131,406
 $126,381
 $115,059
 $5,025
 4% $11,322
 10%
SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Net Sales9.7% 9.3% 9.1%        10.7% 10.5% 9.7%        
Selling,The 2018 increase in selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for 2016 totaled $115.1 millionreflected a higher level of investments in personnel and increased 12% as compared withbusiness growth initiatives, incremental amortization expense and other recurring noncash charges attributed to Angelic during the 2015 totalfirst half of $102.8 million, which had increased 8%2018, and the impact of a prior-year one-time benefit from the 2014 totalfull settlement of $94.8 million.a class-action lawsuit related to a provider of in-store promotional advertising. The 2016higher level of SG&A expenses was partially offset by lower promotional spending and savings gained through the realignment of our retail broker network beginning in the second half of 2018. The 2017 increase in theseSG&A expenses reflected investments in key leadership personnel and strategic business initiatives during the second half of 2017 to support future growth. Transaction costs, reflectedincremental amortization expense and other recurring noncash charges attributed to the influence of overall higher sales volumes, higher levels of consumer spending onAngelic business acquired in November 2016 also impacted SG&A expenses in 2017.
Multiemployer Pension Settlement and Related Costs
In 2017 the employees at our key retail product lines, as well asBedford Heights, Ohio plant voted to ratify a new collective bargaining agreement. Among other terms, the new consumeragreement provided for our complete withdrawal from the underfunded multiemployer Cleveland Bakers and trade activities related to Flatout and amortization expense attributableTeamsters Pension Fund. In lieu of contributions to the Flatout intangible assets. The 2015 increasepension fund, we are making non-elective contributions for the union employees at the Bedford Heights, Ohio plant into a union-sponsored 401(k) plan. We initially funded the new 401(k) plan and paid a withdrawal liability as settlement of our portion of underfunded pension benefits of the multiemployer plan. We recorded a one-time charge of $17.6 million in 2017 for the multiemployer pension settlement and other benefit-related costs. Given the unusual nature of these significant indirect costs, reflected higher consumer promotional spending on new products, transaction expenses relatedthis charge was not allocated to the Flatout acquisition and increased amortization expense attributable to the Flatout intangible assets.our two reportable segments.
Operating Income
Year Ended June 30, ChangeYear Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
Operating Income                          
Specialty Foods$196,592
 $167,095
 $165,383
 $29,497
 18 % $1,712
 1%
Retail$126,391
 $138,470
 $134,900
 $(12,079) (9)% $3,570
 3 %
Foodservice58,432
 66,216
 61,692
 (7,784) (12)% 4,524
 7 %
Multiemployer Pension Settlement and Related Costs
 (17,635) 
 17,635
 (100)% (17,635) N/M
Corporate Expenses(12,022) (12,234) (11,616) 212
 (2)% (618) 5%(12,716) (12,303) (12,022) (413) 3 % (281) 2 %
Total$184,570
 $154,861
 $153,767
 $29,709
 19 % $1,094
 1%$172,107
 $174,748
 $184,570
 $(2,641) (2)% $(9,822) (5)%
Operating Income as a Percentage of Net Sales             
Specialty Foods16.5% 15.1% 15.9%        
Operating Margin             
Retail19.4% 21.6% 21.8%        
Foodservice10.2% 11.8% 10.8%        
Total15.5% 14.0% 14.8%        14.1% 14.5% 15.5%        
Due toSee discussion of operating results by segment following the factors discussed above, the Specialty Foods segment’s operating income for 2016 totaled $196.6 million, an 18% increase from 2015 operating incomediscussion of $167.1 million. The 2015 total was 1% higher than 2014 operating income of $165.4 million.“Net Income” below.
The level of the 20162018 corporate expenses presented above was consistent with our expectations and was similar to those of 20152017 and 2014.

2016.
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
As affectedimpacted by the factors discussed above, our income from continuing operations before income taxes for 20162018 of $184.6$174.2 million increased 19%decreased 1% from the 20152017 total of $154.6$175.5 million. The 20142016 income from continuing operations before income taxes was $153.3$184.6 million.
Taxes Based on Income
Our effective tax rate was 34.1%22.3%, 34.2%34.3% and 34.1% in 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. GivenThe current-year rate was impacted by the natureTax Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 with an effective date of January 1, 2018. Most notably, the Tax Act reduced the statutory federal income tax rate for corporations from 35% to 21%. Since we file our tax return based on our fiscal year, the statutory federal income tax rate for our 2018 tax return will be a blended rate of 28.1%. In addition to the effect of the lower overall federal tax rate, the Tax Act resulted in a $9.5 million one-time benefit for the re-

measurement of our operations (predominately U.S. based for both sales and manufacturing), ournet deferred tax liability in 2018. Looking ahead to 2019, we expect an overall effective tax rates typically stay within a fairly narrow range.rate of approximately 24%. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of the statutory rate to the effective rate for each year.2018, 2017 and 2016.
Income From Continuing OperationsOur taxes based on income for the year ended June 30, 2018 consisted of the following components:
Income
(Dollars in thousands)2018
Federal, state and local provision$49,186
 28.2 %
One-time benefit on re-measurement of net deferred tax liability(9,542) (5.5)%
Net windfall tax benefits - stock-based compensation(755) (0.4)%
Taxes Based on Income$38,889
 22.3 %
The SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) on December 22, 2017. SAB 118 allows for a measurement period in which companies can either use provisional estimates for changes resulting from continuing operationsthe Tax Act or apply the tax laws that were in effect immediately prior to the Tax Act being enacted if estimates cannot be determined at the time of the preparation of the financial statements until the actual impacts can be determined. We recorded an estimate of the impact of the Tax Act within our December 31, 2017 financial statements, including the impact of items recorded within accumulated other comprehensive loss. There were no material changes to these estimates in the six months ended June 30, 2018. We will continue to evaluate the impacts of the Tax Act and record adjustments, as needed, including adjustments related to the filing of our 2018 federal tax return, but do not expect material changes to the amounts recorded. In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new accounting guidance to allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income/loss to retained earnings for 2016stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act. We recorded this reclassification in the quarter ended March 31, 2018. See further discussion under the caption “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
On July 1, 2017, we adopted new accounting guidance for stock-based compensation that, among other things, requires the recognition of $121.8windfall tax benefits and shortfall tax deficiencies in our income tax expense, instead of equity. For 2018, the impact of net windfall tax benefits reduced our effective tax rate by 0.4%. This adoption may result in increased volatility to our quarterly and annual income tax expense and resulting net income, dependent upon, among other variables, the price of our common stock and the timing and volume of share-based payment award activity such as employee exercises of stock-settled stock appreciation rights and vesting of restricted stock awards. This adoption is discussed in further detail under the caption “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Net Income
As influenced by the factors discussed above, particularly the impact of the Tax Act in 2018 and the multiemployer pension charge in 2017, net income for 2018 of $135.3 million increased from 2015the 2017 net income of $115.3 million, which had decreased from continuing operations2016 net income of $101.7$121.8 million. Income from continuing operations was $101.0 million in 2014. Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for each of the years ended June 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 have remained relatively stable. As a result, and due to the change in net income from continuing operations for each year, diluted net income from continuing operations per share totaled $4.44, $3.72 and $3.69 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Discontinued Operations
There were no discontinued operations$4.92 in 2016 and 2015. In 2014, we recorded a loss2018, an increase from discontinued operationsthe 2017 total of $26.0 million, net of tax, or $0.95$4.20 per diluted share, including an after-tax loss of $29.1 million on the sale of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations in January 2014. Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $3.1 million in 2014.
Net Income
As influenced by the factors discussed above, net income forshare. The 2016 of $121.8 million increased from the 2015 net income of $101.7 million, which had increased from 2014 net income of $75.0 million. Diluted net income per share totaled $4.44 per diluted share.
In 2018, the Tax Act resulted in 2016, ana one-time deferred tax benefit of $0.35 per diluted share. In 2017, the estimated impact of the multiemployer pension charge was $0.42 per diluted share.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - SEGMENTS
Retail Segment
 Year Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales$650,234
 $641,417
 $619,384
 $8,817
 1 % $22,033
 4%
Operating Income$126,391
 $138,470
 $134,900
 $(12,079) (9)% $3,570
 3%
Operating Margin19.4% 21.6% 21.8%        
2018 to 2017
In 2018, net sales for the Retail segment reached $650.2 million, a 1% increase from the 2015prior-year total of $3.72 per diluted share.$641.4 million. This increase was driven by increased sales volumes for shelf-stable dressings and sauces sold under license agreements, the incremental sales from the Angelic Bakehouse business acquired in November 2016, pricing actions, reduced trade spending and lower coupon expense, partially offset by reduced sales of frozen garlic bread products in the second and

third quarters of 2018 due to a supply disruption. Pricing actions were implemented starting in the second half of 2018 with a resulting net impact of less than 1% of Retail net sales for 2018.
In 2018, Retail segment operating income and related margins decreased due to the impact of increased commodity and freight costs, investments in personnel and business growth initiatives and incremental amortization expense and other recurring noncash charges attributed to Angelic during the first half of the year. These higher costs were partially offset by supply chain savings realized from our lean six sigma program, some net price realization, lower consumer promotional and other trade spending and lower brokerage costs due to the mid-year realignment of our retail broker network. The 2014prior-year operating income and related margins reflected a significant benefit from lower ingredient costs in the first half of the year.
2017 to 2016
In 2017, net sales for the Retail segment reached $641.4 million, a 4% increase from the 2016 total of $619.4 million with sprouted grain bakery products, shelf-stable dressings sold under license agreements and frozen bread products among the most notable contributing product lines. Higher trade promotion costs served to limit Retail sales growth. The impact of pricing on Retail net sales was minimal for 2017.
In 2017, Retail segment operating income per shareincreased while related margins were essentially flat as the influence of overall lower raw-material costs, primarily for eggs, but also for flour, honey and certain packaging materials, were partially offset by higher retail trade spending, investments in key leadership personnel and strategic business initiatives during the second half of 2017 and the transaction costs, incremental amortization expense and other recurring noncash charges attributed to the Angelic business.
Foodservice Segment
 Year Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales$572,691
 $560,425
 $571,725
 $12,266
 2 % $(11,300) (2)%
Operating Income$58,432
 $66,216
 $61,692
 $(7,784) (12)% $4,524
 7 %
Operating Margin10.2% 11.8% 10.8%        
2018 to 2017
In 2018, Foodservice net sales increased 2% to $572.7 million from the 2017 total of $560.4 million reflecting improvements due to pricing actions that were taken beginning in the third quarter and higher volumes for frozen breads and frozen pasta. This increase was partially offset by the impact of general softness in the restaurant industry in the first half of 2018. Inflationary pricing totaled $2.74 per diluted share, which included1% of Foodservice net sales for 2018.
In 2018, the lossdecline in Foodservice segment operating income and related margins was driven by increased commodity and freight costs and our investments in personnel and business growth initiatives. These higher costs were partially offset by supply chain savings realized from our lean six sigma program and inflationary pricing. The 2017 operating income and related margins reflected a significant benefit from lower ingredient costs in the first half of the year.
With regard to the impact of commodity and freight costs on Foodservice segment operating income, most of our supply contracts with national chain restaurant accounts incorporate pricing adjustments to account for changes in ingredient and freight costs. These supply contracts may vary by account with regard to the saletime lapse between the actual change in ingredient and freight costs we incur and the effective date of discontinued operations.the associated price increase or decrease. As a result, the reported operating margins of the Foodservice segment are subject to increased volatility during periods of rapidly rising or falling ingredient and/or freight costs because at least some portion of the change in ingredient and/or freight costs is reflected in the segment’s results prior to the impact of any associated change in pricing. In addition, the Foodservice segment has an inherently higher degree of margin volatility from changes in ingredient costs when compared to the Retail segment due to its overall lower margin profile and higher ratio of ingredient pounds to net sales.
2017 to 2016
In 2017, net sales for the Foodservice segment reached $560.4 million, a 2% decrease from the 2016 total of $571.7 million as influenced by our targeted business rationalization efforts with certain national chain restaurants that began in the third quarter of 2016 and deflationary pricing, primarily from lower egg costs.
In 2017, Foodservice segment operating income and related margins increased due to the influence of overall lower raw-material costs, primarily for eggs, but also for flour, honey and certain packaging materials, partially offset by deflationary pricing and investments in key leadership personnel and strategic business initiatives during the second half of 2017.

FINANCIAL CONDITION
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We maintain sufficient flexibility in our capital structure to ensure our capitalization is adequate to support our future internal growth prospects, acquire food businesses consistent with our strategic goals, and maintain cash returns to our shareholders through cash dividends and opportunistic share repurchases. Our balance sheet maintained fundamental financial strength during 20162018 as we ended the year with $118$206 million in cash and equivalents, along with shareholders’ equity of $514$652 million and no debt.
Under our unsecured revolving credit facility (“Facility”), we may borrow up to a maximum of $150 million at any one time. We had no borrowings outstanding under the Facility at June 30, 2016.2018. At June 30, 2016,2018, we had $4.7$5.1 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount available for borrowing on the Facility. The Facility expires in April 2021, and all outstanding amounts are then due and payable. Interest is variable based upon formulas tied to LIBOR or an alternative base rate defined in the Facility, at our option. We must also pay facility fees that are tied to our then-applicable consolidated leverage ratio. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. Due to the nature of its terms, when we have outstanding borrowings under the Facility, they will be classified as long-term debt.
The Facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions, and financial covenants relating to interest coverage and leverage. At June 30, 2016,2018, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the Facility,this facility, and we exceeded the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins. At June 30, 2016, we2018, there were not aware of any eventno events that would constitute a default under the Facility.this facility.
We currently expect to remain in compliance with the Facility’s covenants for the foreseeable future. However, a default under the Facility could accelerate the repayment of any then outstanding indebtedness and limit our access to $75 million of additional credit available under the Facility. Such an event could require a reduction in or curtailment of cash dividends or share repurchases, reduce or delay beneficial expansion or investment plans, or otherwise impact our ability to meet our obligations when due.

We believe that cash provided by operating activities and our existing balances in cash and equivalents, in addition to that available under the Facility, should be adequate to meet our cash requirements through 2017.2019. If we were to borrow outside of the Facility under current market terms, our average interest rate may increase significantly and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Cash Flows
Year Ended June 30, ChangeYear Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 20142018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
Provided By Operating Activities$142,585
 $132,772
 $129,091
 $9,813
 7% $3,681
 3 %$160,714
 $146,385
 $145,903
 $14,329
 10 % $482
 %
(Used In) Provided By Investing Activities$(17,423) $(112,325) $8,475
 $94,902
 84% $(120,800) N/M
Used In Investing Activities$(31,452) $(60,608) $(17,423) $29,156
 48 % $(43,185) N/M
Used In Financing Activities$(189,284) $(49,784) $(49,412) $(139,500) N/M
 $(372) (1)%$(66,614) $(60,753) $(192,602) $(5,861) (10)% $131,849
 68%
Cash provided by operating activities remains the primary source offor funding our investing and financing foractivities, as well as financing our internal growth.organic growth initiatives.
Cash provided by operating activities in 20162018 totaled $142.6$160.7 million, an increase of 7%10% as compared with the 20152017 total of $132.8$146.4 million, which increased 3%less than 1% as compared to the 2016 total of $145.9 million. The 2018 increase was primarily due to higher net income, including the benefit from the 2014 total of $129.1 million.lower tax rate resulting from the Tax Act. The 20162017 increase was due to an increase in net income and depreciation and amortization as partially offset by higher working capital requirements. In general, the increased levels ofreflected lower working capital requirements, reflect higher sales volumes and the impact of our Flatout acquisition. Additionally, the changesprimarily in other current assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, reflect the timing of estimatedan increase in deferred tax paymentsliabilities related to property and increases in noncash charges for depreciation and amortization and the favorable tax impact ofnoncash change in acquisition-related contingent consideration. These changes were largely offset by lower net income in 2017, which included the loss on sale of discontinued operations in prior years.one-time multiemployer pension charge. The increase in depreciation and amortization reflects the amortization of intangibles relating to the Flatout acquisition and the related depreciation on its acquired fixed assets, as well as additional depreciation on recent capital expenditures. The 2015 increasechange in cash provided by operating activities was largely influenced byacquisition-related contingent consideration were the discontinued operations resulting fromresult of the saleNovember 2016 acquisition of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations, which were sold in January 2014. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding this sale.Angelic.
Cash used in investing activities totaled $31.5 million in 2018 as compared to $60.6 million in 2017 and $17.4 million in 2016 as compared to a use of $112.3 million in 2015 and a source of $8.5 million in 2014.2016. The 20162018 decrease in cash used in investing activities reflectswas due to the $92.2$35.2 million paid for the acquisition of FlatoutAngelic in March 2015,November 2016, as well aspartially offset by a planned lowerhigher level of capital expenditures in 2016.2018, with the largest amounts spent on warehousing and new equipment to increase capacity and/or improve operational efficiencies. The 20152017 increase in cash used in investing activities reflectsprimarily reflected the cash paid for the 2015 acquisition of Flatout, proceeds from the sale of our candle manufacturing and marketing operationsAngelic in 2014 andNovember 2016, as well as a higher level of capital expenditures comparedin 2017, with the largest amounts spent on packaging equipment to 2014. Our 2015 capital expenditures included a processing capacity expansion project ataccommodate growth and build-out costs related to our Horse Cave, Kentucky dressing facility which was essentially complete at December 31, 2014.corporate office relocation. Capital expenditures totaled $31.0 million in 2018, compared to $27.0 million in 2017 and $16.7 million in 2016, compared to $18.3 million in 2015 and $16.0 million in 2014. Based on our current plans and expectations, we believe our capital expenditures for 2017 could total approximately $20 to $22 million.2016.

Financing activities used net cash totaling $189.3$66.6 million, $49.8$60.8 million and $49.4$192.6 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In general, cash used in financing activities reflects the payment of dividends. The higher level in 2016 was due to higher dividend payments, including the $5.00 per share special dividend that was paid in December 2015. The special dividend payment, which totaled $136.7 million, led to the decline in retained earnings since June 30, 2015 and also resulted in the decrease of Corporate assets from that presented in the business segment information disclosed in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Theregular dividend payout rate for 20162018 was $2.35 per share, as compared to $2.15 per share in 2017 and $1.96 per share excluding the special dividend, as compared to $1.82 per share in 2015 and $1.72 per share in 2014.2016. This past fiscal year marked the 5355rdth consecutive year in which our dividend rate was increased. Cash utilized forA $5.00 per share repurchasesspecial dividend was paid in December 2015, which totaled $0.2 million, $0.6 million and $3.1 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of 2,000,000 shares in November 2010. At June 30, 2016, 1,418,152 shares from this authorization remained authorized for future purchase.$136.7 million.
The future levels of share repurchases and declared dividends are subject to the periodic review of our Board of Directors and are generally determined after an assessment is made of various factors, such as anticipated earnings levels, cash flow requirements and general business conditions.
Our ongoing business activities continue to be subject to compliance with various laws, rules and regulations as may be issued and enforced by various federal, state and local agencies. With respect to environmental matters, costs are incurred pertaining to regulatory compliance and, upon occasion, remediation. Such costs have not been, and are not anticipated to become, material.
We are contingently liable with respect to lawsuits, taxes and various other matters that routinely arise in the normal course of business. We do not have any related party transactions that materially affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS, CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
We do not have off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “Variable Interest Entities,” that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.
We have various contractual obligations that are appropriately recorded as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Certain other items, such as purchasecontractual obligations are not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Examples of such items not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements are commitments to purchase raw materials or packaging inventory that has not yet been received as of June 30, 20162018 and future minimum lease payments for the use of property and equipment under operating lease agreements.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 20162018 (dollars in thousands):
Payment Due by PeriodPayment Due by Period
Contractual ObligationsTotal Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 YearsTotal Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 Years
Operating Lease Obligations (1)$23,303
 $4,810
 $8,614
 $4,090
 $5,789
$23,152
 $6,839
 $8,211
 $4,274
 $3,828
Purchase Obligations (2)148,434
 138,456
 9,654
 324
 
199,737
 180,944
 17,472
 971
 350
Other Noncurrent Liabilities (as reflected on Consolidated Balance Sheet) (3)681
 
 681
 
 
17,720
 
 640
 17,080
 
Total$172,418
 $143,266
 $18,949
 $4,414
 $5,789
$240,609
 $187,783
 $26,323
 $22,325
 $4,178
 
(1)Operating leases are primarily entered into for warehouse and office facilities and certain equipment. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
(2)Purchase obligations represent purchase orders and longer-term purchase arrangements related to the procurement of raw materials, supplies, services, and property, plant and equipment.
(3)This amount does not include $26.0$23.9 million of other noncurrent liabilities recorded on the balance sheet, which largely consist of the underfunded defined benefit pension liability, other post employment benefit obligations, tax liabilities, noncurrent workers compensation obligations, deferred compensation and interest on deferred compensation. These items are excluded, as it is not certain when these liabilities will become due. See Notes 9, 12 13 and 1413 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
IMPACT OF INFLATION
Our business results can be influenced by significant changes in the costs of our raw materials. We attempt to mitigate the impact of inflation on our raw materials by entering into longer-term fixed-price contracts for a portion of our most significant commodities, soybean oil and flour. As we enter 2019, we will begin to implement a new procurement strategy for a portion of our egg needs through the use of grain-based pricing contracts to reduce our exposure to egg market spot prices. However, we remain exposed to events and trends in the marketplace for our other raw-material and packaging costs. While we attempt to pass through sustained increases in raw materialraw-material costs via price adjustments on our retail and foodservice products, such price adjustments will often lag the changes in the related input costs.
For 2015 and 2014, the net impact of inflation was not significant.
As we transitioned from 2015 to 2016, we saw a significant increase in the price of egg-based ingredients due to a significantmajor outbreak of avian influenza in the United States. As noted above, dueDue to timing and the degree of the increase in egg costs, we lagged obtaining cost recovery during the first half of 2016, but we had largely recovered such costs as we exited our then third fiscal quarter. As we enterDuring the first half of 2017, we expect to seeexperienced a deflationary pricing environment within our foodservice channel as the cost of eggs hashad retreated to historical prices, and we have adjusted pricing charged to our foodservice customersnational chain restaurant accounts to reflect the lower input cost of eggs and other key ingredients. Consequently, while the deflationary pricing is expected to have minimal impact to our gross profitwas more than offset by lower egg costs during this period, we expect thisthe first half of 2017, the deflationary pricing action to negatively impact ourimpacted net sales growth from our foodservice channel during the firstperiod. During the second half of fiscal 2017.2017, the net impact of inflation was not significant, but some residual deflationary pricing did impact Foodservice net sales and gross profit in the period.
In 2018, we experienced increased commodity costs across many ingredient and packaging materials, most notably for eggs. The increase in egg costs was principally due to egg-producing issues in Europe which resulted in significantly higher exports from the United States. Additionally, freight costs increased significantly due to capacity constraints in the transportation industry. We implemented pricing actions in both our Retail and Foodservice segments in the second half of 2018. Entering 2019, under current market conditions, we foresee unfavorable material and freight cost comparisons, although to a lesser extent than in 2018. We expect net price realization in 2019 to offset the impact of material and freight cost inflation.
Although typically less notable, we are also exposed to the impacts of general inflation beyond material costs, especially in the areas of annual wage adjustments and benefit costs. Over time, we attempt to minimize the exposure to such cost increases through greater manufacturing and distribution efficiencies the improvement of work processesvia our lean six sigma program and strategic investments in plant equipment.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
This MD&A discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including, but not limited to, those related to accounts receivable allowances, distribution costs, asset impairments and self-insurance reserves. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Historically, the aggregate differences, if any, between our estimates and actual amounts in any year have not had a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. While a summary of our significant accounting policies can be found in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, we believe the following critical accounting policies reflect those areas in which more significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss, provided that evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Net sales are recorded net of estimated sales discounts, returns, trade promotions and certain other sales incentives, including coupon redemptions and rebates. See discussion of new accounting guidance for revenue recognition, which will be applicable for us beginning on July 1, 2018, under the caption “Recently Issued Accounting Standards” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Receivables and Related Allowances
We evaluate the adequacy of our allowances for customer deductions considering several factors including historical experience, specific trade programs and existing customer relationships. We also provide an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of accounts receivable balances, historical write-off experience and on-going reviews of our trade receivables. Measurement of potential losses requires credit review of existing customer relationships, consideration of historical loss experience, including the need to adjust for current conditions, and judgments about the probable effects of relevant observable data, including present economic conditions such as delinquency rates and the economic health of customers.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill is not amortized. It is evaluated annually at April 30 by applying impairment testing procedures, as appropriate.procedures. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives to Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. We evaluate the future economic benefit of the recorded goodwill and other intangible assets when events or circumstances indicate potential recoverability concerns. Carrying amounts are adjusted appropriately when determined to have been impaired.
Accrued Distribution
We incur various freight and other related costs associated with shipping products to our customers and warehouses. We provide accruals for unbilled shipments from carriers utilizing historical or projected freight rates and other relevant information.
Accruals for Self-Insurance
Self-insurance accruals are made for certain claims associated with employee health care, workers’ compensation and general liability insurance. These accruals include estimates that are primarily based on historical loss development factors.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recent accounting pronouncements and their impact on our consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the PSLRA and other applicable securities laws. Such statements can be identified by the use of the forward-looking words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “expect,” “hope” or similar words. These statements discuss future expectations; contain projections regarding future developments, operations or financial conditions; or state other

forward-looking information. Such statements are based upon assumptions and assessments made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements involve various important risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ as a result of factors over which we have no, or limited, control including, without limitation, the specific influences outlined below. Management believes these forward-looking statements to be reasonable; however, one should not place undue reliance on such statements that are based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements, except as required by law.
Items which could impact these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those risk factors identified in Item 1A and:

price and product competition;
the impactadverse changes in freight, energy or other costs of any regulatory matters affectingproducing, distributing or transporting our food business, including any required labeling changes and their impact on consumer demand;
the potential for loss of larger programs or key customer relationships;products;
fluctuations in the cost and availability of ingredients and packaging;
the reaction of customers or consumers to the effect of price increases we may implement;
price and product competition;
the impact of customer store brands on our branded retail volumes;
the lack of market acceptance of new products;
dependence on contract manufacturers, distributors and freight transporters;
capacity constraints that may affect our ability to meet demand or may increase our costs;
the success and cost of new product development efforts;
dependence on key personnel and changes in key personnel;
the effect of consolidation of customers within key market channels;
the success and cost of new product development efforts;ability to successfully grow recently acquired businesses;
the lack of market acceptance of new products;extent to which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated;
the possible occurrence of product recalls or other defective or mislabeled product costs;
the potential for loss of larger programs or key customer relationships;
changes in demand for our products, which may result from loss of brand reputation or customer goodwill;
maintenance of competitive position with respect to other manufacturers;
adverse changes in freight, energy or other costs of producing, distributing or transporting our products;
capacity constraints that may affect our ability to meet demand or may increase our costs;
dependence on contract manufacturers;
efficiencies in plant operations;
the impact of any regulatory matters affecting our food business, including any required labeling changes and their impact on consumer demand;
stability of labor relations, including the impact of our current contract negotiations with a collective bargaining unit;relations;
the outcome of any litigation or arbitration;
the impact, if any, of certain contingent liabilities associated with our withdrawal from a multiemployer pension plan;
the impact of fluctuations in our pension plan asset values on funding levels, contributions required and benefit costs;
the extent to which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated;
dependence on key personnel and changes in key personnel;
changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments; and
certain other risk factors, including those discussed in other filings we have submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We have exposure to market risks primarily from changes in raw material prices. In recent years, due to the absence of any borrowings, we have not had exposure to changes in interest rates. We also have not had exposure to market risk associated with derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments as we do not utilize any such instruments.
RAW MATERIAL PRICE RISK
We purchase a variety of commodities and other raw materials, such as soybean oil, flour, eggs and dairy-based materials, which we use to manufacture our products. The market prices for these commodities are subject to fluctuation based upon a number of economic factors and may become volatile at times. A recent example of such volatility occurred as we transitioned from 2015 to 2016 and the price of egg-based ingredients increased suddenly and dramatically due to a significant outbreak of avian influenza in the United States which sharply curtailed supply. While we do not use any derivative commodity instruments to hedge against commodity price risk, we do actively manage a portion of the risk through a structured forward purchasing program for certain key materials such as soybean oil and flour. This program, coupled with short-term fixed price arrangements on other significant raw materials, gives us more predictable input costs, which may help stabilize our short-term margins during periods of volatility in commodity markets.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Lancaster Colony Corporation
Columbus, Ohio
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lancaster Colony Corporation and subsidiariesSubsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 20162018 and 2015, and2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2016. Our audits also included2018, and the financial statement schedule listed inrelated notes (collectively referred to as the table of contents at Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)“financial statements”). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidatedthe financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2016,2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016,2018, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated August 24, 2016,27, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Columbus, Ohio
August 24, 201627, 2018

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1961.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
June 30,June 30,
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)2016 20152018 2017
ASSETS
Current Assets:      
Cash and equivalents$118,080
 $182,202
$205,752
 $143,104
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts, 2016-$125; 2015-$206)66,006
 62,437
Receivables72,960
 69,922
Inventories:      
Raw materials26,153
 30,655
32,673
 28,447
Finished goods49,944
 47,244
58,188
 47,929
Total inventories76,097
 77,899
90,861
 76,376
Other current assets7,644
 7,672
9,304
 11,744
Total current assets267,827
 330,210
378,877
 301,146
Property, Plant and Equipment:      
Land, buildings and improvements116,858
 113,844
132,318
 124,673
Machinery and equipment263,336
 253,143
293,409
 272,582
Total cost380,194
 366,987
425,727
 397,255
Less accumulated depreciation210,599
 194,676
234,914
 216,584
Property, plant and equipment-net169,595
 172,311
190,813
 180,671
Other Assets:      
Goodwill143,788
 143,788
168,030
 168,030
Other intangible assets-net44,866
 47,771
56,176
 60,162
Other noncurrent assets8,656
 8,076
10,595
 6,396
Total$634,732
 $702,156
$804,491
 $716,405
      
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:      
Accounts payable$39,931
 $38,823
$57,978
 $41,353
Accrued liabilities33,072
 35,821
35,789
 35,270
Total current liabilities73,003
 74,644
93,767
 76,623
Other Noncurrent Liabilities26,698
 23,654
41,638
 38,598
Deferred Income Taxes21,433
 22,940
16,804
 25,207
Commitments and Contingencies
 

 
Shareholders’ Equity:      
Preferred stock-authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding-none
 

 
Common stock-authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding-2016-27,423,550 shares; 2015-27,360,581 shares110,677
 107,767
Common stock-authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding-2018-27,487,989 shares; 2017-27,448,424 shares119,232
 115,174
Retained earnings1,150,337
 1,219,119
1,279,343
 1,206,671
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(11,350) (10,057)(8,259) (8,936)
Common stock in treasury, at cost(736,066) (735,911)(738,034) (736,932)
Total shareholders’ equity513,598
 580,918
652,282
 575,977
Total$634,732
 $702,156
$804,491
 $716,405
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
Years Ended June 30,Years Ended June 30,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Net Sales$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
$1,222,925
 $1,201,842
 $1,191,109
Cost of Sales891,480
 846,822
 792,507
919,412
 883,078
 891,480
Gross Profit299,629
 257,692
 248,568
303,513
 318,764
 299,629
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses115,059
 102,831
 94,801
131,406
 126,381
 115,059
Multiemployer Pension Settlement and Related Costs
 17,635
 
Operating Income184,570
 154,861
 153,767
172,107
 174,748
 184,570
Other, Net63
 (309) (488)2,096
 768
 63
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes184,633
 154,552
 153,279
Income Before Income Taxes174,203
 175,516
 184,633
Taxes Based on Income62,869
 52,866
 52,293
38,889
 60,202
 62,869
Income From Continuing Operations121,764
 101,686
 100,986
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax:     
Income from discontinued operations
 
 3,058
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
 
 (29,058)
Total discontinued operations
 
 (26,000)
Net Income$121,764
 $101,686
 $74,986
$135,314
 $115,314
 $121,764
Income Per Common Share From Continuing Operations:     
Basic$4.45
 $3.72
 $3.70
Diluted$4.44
 $3.72
 $3.69
Loss Per Common Share From Discontinued Operations:     
Basic and diluted$
 $
 $(0.95)
Net Income Per Common Share:          
Basic$4.45
 $3.72
 $2.75
$4.93
 $4.21
 $4.45
Diluted$4.44
 $3.72
 $2.74
$4.92
 $4.20
 $4.44
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:          
Basic27,336
 27,300
 27,264
27,403
 27,376
 27,336
Diluted27,373
 27,327
 27,308
27,459
 27,440
 27,373
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
Years Ended June 30,Years Ended June 30,
(Amounts in thousands)2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Net Income$121,764
 $101,686
 $74,986
$135,314
 $115,314
 $121,764
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:     
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):     
Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans:          
Net (loss) gain arising during the period, before tax(4,200) (3,563) 96
Net gain (loss) arising during the period, before tax3,041
 3,334
 (4,200)
Prior service credit arising during the period, before tax1,770
 
 

 
 1,770
Amortization of loss, before tax505
 401
 433
536
 677
 505
Amortization of prior service credit, before tax(126) (5) (5)(182) (182) (126)
Total Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Before Tax(2,051) (3,167) 524
Tax Attributes of Items in Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:     
Net (loss) gain arising during the period, tax1,551
 1,318
 (36)
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax3,395
 3,829
 (2,051)
Tax Attributes of Items in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):     
Net gain (loss) arising during the period, tax(710) (1,231) 1,551
Prior service credit arising during the period, tax(654) 
 

 
 (654)
Amortization of loss, tax(186) (149) (160)(180) (250) (186)
Amortization of prior service credit, tax47
 2
 2
61
 66
 47
Total Tax Benefit (Expense)758
 1,171
 (194)
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Tax(1,293) (1,996) 330
Total Tax (Expense) Benefit(829) (1,415) 758
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax2,566
 2,414
 (1,293)
Comprehensive Income$120,471
 $99,690
 $75,316
$137,880
 $117,728
 $120,471
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
Years Ended June 30,Years Ended June 30,
(Amounts in thousands)2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:          
Net income$121,764
 $101,686
 $74,986
$135,314
 $115,314
 $121,764
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Impacts of noncash items:     
Depreciation and amortization24,147
 21,111
 20,407
26,896
 24,906
 24,147
Deferred income taxes and other noncash changes(525) 306
 2,720
Change in acquisition-related contingent consideration2,052
 1,156
 
Deferred income taxes and other changes(8,502) 2,347
 (525)
Stock-based compensation expense3,326
 3,040
 2,472
5,039
 4,248
 3,326
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation(1,417) (563) (1,020)
Gain on sale of property
 
 (6)(10) (629) 
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
 
 44,033
Pension plan activity(296) (591) (243)(434) (244) (296)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
Receivables(3,547) (1,900) (6,881)(3,040) (2,598) (3,547)
Inventories1,802
 366
 1,122
(14,485) 150
 1,802
Other current assets1,445
 5,229
 (1,147)2,164
 (2,958) 1,445
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(4,114) 4,088
 (7,352)15,720
 4,693
 (2,213)
Net cash provided by operating activities142,585
 132,772
 129,091
160,714
 146,385
 145,903
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:          
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired(12) (92,217) 
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired(318) (35,169) (12)
Payments for property additions(16,671) (18,298) (15,961)(31,025) (27,005) (16,671)
Proceeds from sale of property
 
 6
38
 1,475
 
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations
 
 25,610
Other-net(740) (1,810) (1,180)(147) 91
 (740)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(17,423) (112,325) 8,475
Net cash used in investing activities(31,452) (60,608) (17,423)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:          
Purchase of treasury stock(155) (569) (3,120)(1,102) (866) (155)
Payment of dividends (including special dividend payment, 2016-$136,677; 2015-$0; 2014-$0)(190,546) (49,778) (46,988)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation1,417
 563
 1,020
Decrease in cash overdraft balance
 
 (324)
Payment of dividends (including special dividend payment, 2018-$0; 2017-$0; 2016-$136,677)(64,531) (58,980) (190,546)
Tax withholdings for stock-based compensation(981) (907) (1,901)
Net cash used in financing activities(189,284) (49,784) (49,412)(66,614) (60,753) (192,602)
Net change in cash and equivalents(64,122) (29,337) 88,154
62,648
 25,024
 (64,122)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year182,202
 211,539
 123,385
143,104
 118,080
 182,202
Cash and equivalents at end of year$118,080
 $182,202
 $211,539
$205,752
 $143,104
 $118,080
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
(Amounts in thousands,
except per share data)
 
Common Stock
Outstanding
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 
Common Stock
Outstanding
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Shares Amount         Shares Amount        
Balance, June 30, 2013 27,324
 $102,622
 $1,139,213
 $(8,391) $(732,222) $501,222
Net income     74,986
     74,986
Net pension and postretirement benefit gains, net of $194 tax effect       330
   330
Cash dividends - common stock ($1.72 per share)     (46,988)     (46,988)
Purchase of treasury stock (42)       (3,120) (3,120)
Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits 57
 (305)       (305)
Stock-based compensation expense   2,472
       2,472
Balance, June 30, 2014 27,339
 104,789
 1,167,211
 (8,061) (735,342) 528,597
Net income     101,686
     101,686
Net pension and postretirement benefit losses, net of ($1,171) tax effect       (1,996)   (1,996)
Cash dividends - common stock ($1.82 per share)     (49,778)     (49,778)
Purchase of treasury stock (6)       (569) (569)
Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits 28
 (62)       (62)
Stock-based compensation expense   3,040
       3,040
Balance, June 30, 2015 27,361
 107,767
 1,219,119
 (10,057) (735,911) 580,918
 27,361
 $107,767
 $1,219,119
 $(10,057) $(735,911) $580,918
Net income     121,764
     121,764
     121,764
     121,764
Net pension and postretirement benefit losses, net of ($758) tax effect       (1,293)   (1,293)       (1,293)   (1,293)
Cash dividends - common stock ($6.96 per share)     (190,546)     (190,546)     (190,546)     (190,546)
Purchase of treasury stock (2)       (155) (155) (2)       (155) (155)
Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits 65
 (416)       (416) 65
 (416)       (416)
Stock-based compensation expense   3,326
       3,326
   3,326
       3,326
Balance, June 30, 2016 27,424
 $110,677
 $1,150,337
 $(11,350) $(736,066) $513,598
 27,424
 110,677
 1,150,337
 (11,350) (736,066) 513,598
Net income     115,314
     115,314
Net pension and postretirement benefit gains, net of $1,415 tax effect       2,414
   2,414
Cash dividends - common stock ($2.15 per share)     (58,980)     (58,980)
Purchase of treasury stock (6)       (866) (866)
Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits 30
 249
       249
Stock-based compensation expense   4,248
       4,248
Balance, June 30, 2017 27,448
 115,174
 1,206,671
 (8,936) (736,932) 575,977
Net income     135,314
     135,314
Net pension and postretirement benefit gains, net of $829 tax effect       2,566
   2,566
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings     1,889
 (1,889)   
Cash dividends - common stock ($2.35 per share)     (64,531)     (64,531)
Purchase of treasury stock (9)       (1,102) (1,102)
Stock-based plans 49
 (981)       (981)
Stock-based compensation expense   5,039
       5,039
Balance, June 30, 2018 27,488
 $119,232
 $1,279,343
 $(8,259) $(738,034) $652,282
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lancaster Colony Corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “we,” “us,” “our,” “registrant,” or the “Company.” Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted, references to “year” pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 20162018 refers to fiscal 2016,2018, which is the period from July 1, 20152017 to June 30, 2016.2018.
Discontinued Operations
On January 30, 2014, we sold effectively all ofEffective July 1, 2017, David A. Ciesinski, our President and Chief Operating Officer, succeeded John B. Gerlach, Jr. as Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). As President and CEO, Mr. Ciesinski became our principal executive officer and chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). This change resulted in modifications to the net operating assets ofCODM’s approach to managing the business, assessing performance and allocating resources. Consequently, beginning on July 1, 2017, our candle manufacturingsegment reporting structure was amended to align with these changes, and marketing operations. Theour financial results of these operationsare now presented as two reportable segments: Retail and Foodservice. See Note 10 for 2014 are reported as discontinued operations. See further discussion and disclosure about discontinued operations in Note 3.additional details. All historical information was retroactively conformed to the current presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimatesEstimates included in these consolidated financial statements include allowances for customer deductions, net realizable value of inventories, useful lives for the calculation of depreciation and amortization, distribution accruals, pension and postretirement assumptions and self-insurance accruals. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash and Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents including money market funds and commercial paper, approximate fair value due to their short maturities and are considered level 1 investments, which have quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets. As a result of our cash management system, checks issued but not presented to the banks for payment may create negative book cash balances. When such negative balances exist, they are included in Accrued Liabilities.
Receivables and Related Allowances
We evaluate the adequacy of our allowances for customer deductions considering several factors including historical experience, specific trade programs and existing customer relationships. We also provide an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of accounts receivable balances, historical write-off experience and on-going reviews of our trade receivables. Measurement of potential losses requires credit review of existing customer relationships, consideration of historical loss experience, including the need to adjust for current conditions, and judgments about the probable effects of relevant observable data, including present economic conditions such as delinquency rates and the economic health of customers. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was immaterial for all periods presented.
Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and equivalents and trade accounts receivable. By policy, we limit the amount of credit exposure to any one institution or issuer. Our concentration of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable is mitigated by our credit evaluation process and by having a large and diverse customer base. However, see Note 10 with respect to our accounts receivable with Wal-Mart Stores,Walmart Inc. and McLane Company, Inc., a wholesale distribution subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
 Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value and are costed by various methods that approximate actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. Due to the nature of our business, work in process inventory is not a material component of inventory. When necessary, we provide allowances to adjust the carrying value of our inventory to the lower of cost or net realizable value, including any costs to sell or dispose. The determination of whether inventory items are slow moving, obsolete or in excess of needs requires estimates about the future demand for our products. The estimates as to future demand used in the valuation of inventory are subject to the ongoing success of our products and may differ from actual due to factors such as changes in customer and consumer demand.

3034

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are statedrecorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, except for those acquired as part of a business combination, which are statedrecorded at fair value at the time of purchase. We use the straight-line method of computing depreciation for financial reporting purposes based on the estimated useful lives of the corresponding assets. Estimated useful lives for buildings and improvements range generally from 10 to 40 years, while machinery and equipment, excluding technology-related equipment, range generally from 3 to 15 years and technology-related equipment range generally from 3 to 5 years. For tax purposes, we generally compute depreciation using accelerated methods.
Purchases of property, plant and equipment included in accounts payableAccounts Payable and excluded from the property additions and the change in accounts payable in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows at June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Construction in progress in accounts payable$1,000
 $189
 $2,755
 2018 2017 2016
Construction in progress in Accounts Payable$2,070
 $622
 $1,000
The following table sets forth depreciation expense in each of the years ended June 30:
 2016 2015 2014
Depreciation expense$20,114
 $18,867
 $17,419
 2018 2017 2016
Depreciation expense$22,168
 $20,430
 $20,114
Long-Lived Assets
We monitor the recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived assets by periodically considering whether indicators of impairment are present. If such indicators are present, we determine if the assets are recoverable by comparing the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows to the assets’ carrying amounts. Our cash flows are based on historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions. If the carrying amounts are greater, then the assets are not recoverable. In that instance, we compare the carrying amounts to the fair value to determine the amount of the impairment to be recorded.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill is not amortized. It is evaluated annually at April 30 by applying impairment testing procedures, as appropriate.procedures. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives to Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. We evaluate the future economic benefit of the recorded goodwill and other intangible assets when events or circumstances indicate potential recoverability concerns. Carrying amounts are adjusted appropriately when determined to have been impaired. See further discussion regarding goodwill and other intangible assets in Note 7.
Accrued Distribution
We incur various freight and other related costs associated with shipping products to our customers and warehouses. We provide accruals for unbilled shipments from carriers utilizing historical or projected freight rates and other relevant information.
Accruals for Self-Insurance
Self-insurance accruals are made for certain claims associated with employee health care, workers’ compensation and general liability insurance. These accruals include estimates that are primarily based on historical loss development factors.
Shareholders’ Equity
We are authorized to issue 3,050,000 shares of preferred stock consisting of 750,000 shares of Class A Participating Preferred Stock with $1.00 par value, 1,150,000 shares of Class B Voting Preferred Stock without par value and 1,150,000 shares of Class C Nonvoting Preferred Stock without par value. Our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of 2,000,000 common shares in November 2010. At June 30, 2016, 1,418,1522018, 1,402,219 common shares remained authorized for future purchase.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss, provided that evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Net sales are recorded net of estimated sales discounts, returns, trade promotions and certain other sales incentives, including coupon redemptions and rebates. See discussion of new accounting guidance for revenue recognition, which will be applicable for us beginning on July 1, 2018, under the caption “Recently Issued Accounting Standards” below.

3135

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Advertising Expense
We expense advertising as it is incurred. The following table summarizes advertising expense as a percentage of net sales in each of the years ended June 30:
 2016 2015 2014
Advertising expense as a percentage of net sales3% 2% 2%
 2018 2017 2016
Advertising expense as a percentage of net sales2% 3% 3%
Research and Development Costs
We expense research and development costs as they are incurred. The estimated amount spent during each of the last three years on research and development activities was less than 1% of net sales.
Distribution Costs
Distribution fees billed to customers are included in Net Sales, while our distribution costs incurred are included in Cost of Sales.
Stock-Based Employee Compensation Plans
We account for our stock-based employee compensation plans in accordance with GAAP for stock-based compensation, which requires the measurement and recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The cost of the employee services is recognized as compensation expense over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award, which is typically the vesting period. As our previous plan expired in May 2015, we obtained shareholder approval of a new plan at our November 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. See further discussion and disclosure in Note 11.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits reflect management’s best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid. We are subject to income taxes in numerous domestic jurisdictions.
Our annual effective tax rate is determined based on our income, statutory tax rates and the permanent tax impacts of items treated differently for tax purposes than for financial reporting purposes. Tax law requires certain items be included in the tax return at different times than the items are reflected in the financial statements. Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in our tax return, and some differences are temporary, reversing over time, such as depreciation expense. These temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. See further discussion in Note 9.
Realization of certain deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in the appropriate jurisdiction prior to the expiration of the carryforward periods. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized and thus we have not recorded any valuation allowance for the years ended June 30, 20162018 or 2015.2017.
In accordance with accounting literature related to uncertainty in income taxes, tax benefits and liabilities from uncertain tax positions that are recognized in the financial statements are measured based on the largest attribute that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Management is not aware of any such changes that would have a material effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See further discussion in Note 9.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents (restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation rights) outstanding during each period. Unvested shares of restricted stock granted to employees are considered participating securities since employees receive nonforfeitable dividends prior to vesting and, therefore, are included in the earnings allocation in computing EPS under the two-class method. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, which includes the dilutive potential common shares associated with nonparticipating restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation rights.

3236

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Basic and diluted net income per common share from continuing operations were calculated as follows:
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Income from continuing operations$121,764
 $101,686
 $100,986
Income from continuing operations available to participating securities(242) (143) (174)
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders$121,522
 $101,543
 $100,812
Net income$135,314
 $115,314
 $121,764
Net income available to participating securities(271) (196) (242)
Net income available to common shareholders$135,043
 $115,118
 $121,522
          
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic27,336
 27,300
 27,264
27,403
 27,376
 27,336
Incremental share effect from:          
Nonparticipating restricted stock3
 3
 3
3
 3
 3
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights34
 24
 41
53
 61
 34
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted27,373
 27,327
 27,308
27,459
 27,440
 27,373
          
Income per common share from continuing operations - basic$4.45
 $3.72
 $3.70
Income per common share from continuing operations - diluted$4.44
 $3.72
 $3.69
Net income per common share - basic$4.93
 $4.21
 $4.45
Net income per common share - diluted$4.92
 $4.20
 $4.44
Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income includes changes in equity that result from transactions and economic events from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income is composed of two subsets – net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Included in other comprehensive income (loss) are pension and postretirement benefits adjustments.
The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss by component:
 2016 2015
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of year$(10,057) $(8,061)
Defined Benefit Pension Plan Items:   
Net loss arising during the period(4,409) (3,408)
Amortization of unrecognized net loss (1)
539
 429
Postretirement Benefit Plan Items:   
Net gain (loss) arising during the period (2)
209
 (155)
Prior service credit arising during the period (2)
1,770
 
Amortization of unrecognized net gain (1)
(34) (28)
Amortization of prior service credit (1)
(126) (5)
Total other comprehensive loss, before tax(2,051) (3,167)
Total tax benefit758
 1,171
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(1,293) (1,996)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of year$(11,350) $(10,057)
 2018 2017
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of year$(8,936) $(11,350)
Defined Benefit Pension Plan Items:   
Net gain arising during the period2,987
 3,339
Amortization of unrecognized net loss (1)
572
 715
Postretirement Benefit Plan Items: (2)
   
Net gain (loss) arising during the period54
 (5)
Amortization of unrecognized net gain(36) (38)
Amortization of prior service credit(182) (182)
Total other comprehensive income, before tax3,395
 3,829
Total tax expense(829) (1,415)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax2,566
 2,414
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings (3)
(1,889) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of year$(8,259) $(8,936)
(1)Included in the computation of net periodic benefit income/cost. See NotesNote 12 and 13 for additional information.
(2)Includes a negative plan amendment and subsequent remeasurement. Additional disclosures for postretirement benefits are not included as they are not considered material.
(3)See further discussion of this reclassification under the caption “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards” within Note 13 for additional information.1.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In July 2015,March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance which requires entities to measure most inventory “atimprove the lowerpresentation of net periodic pension cost orand net realizable value,” thereby simplifying current guidance. Under current guidance an entity must measure inventory atperiodic postretirement benefit cost by disaggregating the lowerservice cost component from the other components of cost or market, where market is defined as one of three different measures, one of which is net realizable value. We will adopt this guidance on a prospective basis in fiscal 2017 including interim periods. We do not believe it will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to simplify the accounting for stock-based compensation.periodic benefit cost. The amendments include changesrequire an employer to present service cost in the accountingsame line item(s) as compensation costs for share-based payment transactions, includingthe pertinent employees whereas the other components of net periodic benefit cost must be reported separately from service cost and outside of income from operations. The amendments also allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization. The amendments require retrospective application for the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilitiesstatement presentation provisions and classification onprospective application for the statement of cash flows. The guidance will be effective for us in fiscal 2018 including interim periods. The transition method that will be applied on adoption varies for eachcapitalization of the amendments. We are currently evaluating the impactservice cost component. However, as a result of this guidance.prior years’ restructuring activities, we no longer have any active employees continuing to accrue service cost.

3337

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Therefore, the service cost provisions are not applicable to us, and we expect only changes in classification on the income statement. We will adopt the new guidance on July 1, 2018.
In May 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for the recognition of revenue underand issued subsequent clarifications of this new guidance in 2016 and 2017. The core principle of the principle: “Recognizenew guidance states that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” The This model is based on a control approach rather than the current risks and rewards model. We have completed a review of selected customer contracts and evaluated the impact of the new standard on certain common practices currently employed by us and by other manufacturers of consumer products. We have also finalized our assessment of the impact this standard will have on our accounting policies, processes, system requirements, internal controls and disclosures using internal resources and the assistance of a third party. We will adopt the new guidance on July 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective approach, but we will be effective for us in fiscal 2019 including interim periods and will require either retrospective application to each prior period presented or retrospective application with the cumulative effect ofnot record a cumulative-effect adjustment from initially applying the standard recognized atas the dateadoption will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of adoption. The FASB issued subsequent clarifications of this new accounting guidanceoperations. There will be additional required disclosures in 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance.notes to the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In February 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for leases with terms of more than 12 months. The updatedmonths and issued subsequent clarifications of this new guidance in 2018. This guidance retains the two classifications of a lease as either an operating or finance lease (previously referred to as a capital lease). Both lease classifications require the lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability based upon the present value of the lease payments. Finance leases will reflect the financial arrangement by recognizing interest expense on the lease liability separately from the amortization expense of the right-of-use asset. Operating leases will recognize lease expense (with no separate recognition of interest expense) on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The updated guidance requires expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures, including additional information about the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The guidance will be effective for us in fiscal 2020 including interim periods usingperiods. In July 2018, the FASB issued guidance that allows for an alternate transition method whereby companies can recognize a modified retrospective approach.cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption rather than restating comparative periods. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In November 2015,February 2018, the FASB issued new accounting guidance whichto allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income/loss to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”). GAAP requires deferred tax assets and liabilities as well as anyto be adjusted for the effect of a change in tax rates with the effect of the change included in income from continuing operations even when the related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrentincome tax effects of items in accumulated other comprehensive income/loss were originally recognized in other comprehensive income rather than in income from continuing operations. We adopted the new guidance on the balance sheet. As a result, each jurisdiction will only have one net noncurrent deferred tax asset or liability. This guidance may be applied on either a prospective or retrospective basis in the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this guidance effective December 31, 2015 using a retrospective basiselected to reclassify these stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings in the period of adoption. WithThese tax effects related to the adoption, our net deferred tax liability for all periods presentedimpact of the change in the Consolidated Balance Sheets has been classified as noncurrent. For June 30, 2015,federal income tax rate on pension and postretirement benefit amounts remaining in accumulated other comprehensive loss, and the reclassification resulted in a net increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $12.8 million of current deferred tax assets to noncurrent liabilities caused the Other Current Assets line to change from $20.5 million to $7.7$1.9 million and the Deferred Income Taxes linea corresponding increase in retained earnings. Our accounting policy is to changerelease stranded tax effects from $35.7 million to $22.9 million.accumulated other comprehensive loss. As this guidance only relates to balance sheet classification, there was no impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
In September 2015,March 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which allows entities to prospectively reflect adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized for a business combination during the measurement period. Under the current guidance these adjustments need to be reflected retrospectively as ifsimplify the accounting had been completed atfor stock-based compensation. The amendments include changes to the acquisition date.accounting for share-based payment transactions, including: the inclusion of the tax consequences related to stock-based compensation within the computation of income tax expense versus equity; the classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and the classification of share-based activity on the statement of cash flows. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years,adoption may result in increased volatility to our quarterly and interimannual income tax expense and resulting net income in future periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015 but can be adopted early if financial statements have not been issued.dependent upon, among other variables, the price of our common stock and the timing and volume of share-based payment award activity such as employee exercises of stock-settled stock appreciation rights and vesting of restricted stock awards. We adopted the new guidance on July 1, 2017 and elected to continue to estimate forfeitures. The adoption of this guidance effective July 1, 2015,resulted in 1) the prospective recognition of windfall tax benefits and it did not have ashortfall tax deficiencies in income tax expense; 2) the retrospective reclassification of windfall tax benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows from financing activities to operating activities; and 3) the retrospective reclassification of employee tax withholdings on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows from operating activities to financing activities. There was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.statements as a result of this adoption.


38

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 2 – Acquisition
On March 13, 2015,November 17, 2016, we acquired substantially all of the issued and outstanding capital stockassets of Flatout Holdings,Angelic Bakehouse, Inc. (“Flatout”Angelic”),. Angelic, a privately owned manufacturer and marketer of flatbread wraps and pizza crustspremium sprouted grain bakery products, is based in Saline, Michigan.near Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The purchase price net of cash acquired, was $92.2$35.5 million and was funded by cash on hand. The purchase price was subjecthand and includes immaterial post-closing adjustments, which were paid in April 2017 and July 2017, but excludes contingent consideration relating to an additional earn-out payment which is tied to performance-based conditions. In general, the terms of the acquisition specify the sellers will receive an earn-out based upon a net working capital adjustment, which was settledpre-determined multiple of the defined adjusted EBITDA of Angelic for fiscal 2021. We are unable to provide a range for the amount of this earn-out because it is based on the future adjusted EBITDA of Angelic, and the earn-out does not contain a minimum or maximum value. See further discussion of the earn-out in July 2015. FlatoutNote 3. Angelic is reported in our Specialty FoodsRetail segment, and its results of operations have been included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
The following table summarizes the consideration related to the acquisition and the final purchase price allocation based on the fair value of the net assets acquired:
Consideration 
Purchase price$35,487
Contingent consideration - fair value of earn-out at date of closing13,872
Fair value of total consideration$49,359
  
Purchase Price Allocation 
Trade receivables$831
Other receivables550
Inventories430
Other current assets19
Property, plant and equipment5,083
Goodwill (tax deductible)24,242
Other intangible assets18,749
Current liabilities(545)
Net assets acquired$49,359

Note 3 – Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. GAAP sets forth a three-level fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1 – defined as observable inputs, such as quoted market prices in active markets.
Level 2 – defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 – defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore, requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
Our financial assets and liabilities subject to the three-level fair value hierarchy consist principally of cash and equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, contingent consideration payable and defined benefit pension plan assets. The estimated fair value of cash and equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their carrying value. See Note 12 for fair value disclosures related to our defined benefit pension plan assets.

3439

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Our contingent consideration, which is measured at fair value on a recurring basis, is included in Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes our contingent consideration as of June 30:
 Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2018
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Acquisition-related contingent consideration$
$
$17,080
$17,080
     
 Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Acquisition-related contingent consideration$
$
$15,028
$15,028
The contingent consideration resulted from the earn-out associated with our November 17, 2016 acquisition of Angelic. The purchase price allocationdid not include the future earn-out payment which is tied to performance-based conditions. In general, the terms of the acquisition specify the sellers will receive an earn-out based upon a pre-determined multiple of the defined adjusted EBITDA of Angelic for fiscal 2021. The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated using a present value approach, which incorporates factors such as business risks and projections, to estimate an expected value. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. Using this valuation technique, the fair value of the net assets acquired:contingent consideration was determined to be $13.9 million at November 17, 2016.
The following table represents our Level 3 fair value measurements using significant other unobservable inputs for acquisition-related contingent consideration:
Balance Sheet CaptionsAllocation
Receivables$2,479
Inventories3,749
Other current assets212
Property, plant and equipment6,937
Goodwill (not tax deductible)53,948
Other intangible assets44,000
Current liabilities(2,445)
Deferred tax liabilities(16,651)
Net assets acquired$92,229
The goodwill recognized above arose because the purchase price for Flatout reflected a number of factors including the future earnings and cash flow potential of Flatout and the avoidance of the time and costs which would be required (and the associated risks that would be encountered) to enhance our existing product offerings and enter the supermarket deli department. Goodwill also resulted from the workforce acquired with Flatout, as well as the impact of deferred tax liabilities established on the acquired assets.
We determined the values and lives of the other intangible assets listed in the allocation above as: $34.5 million for the tradename with a 30-year life; $5.0 million for the customer relationships with a 10-year life; $3.9 million for the technology / know-how with a 10-year life and $0.6 million for the non-compete agreements with a 5-year life.
Pro forma results of operations have not been presented herein as the acquisition was not considered material to our 2015 results of operations.

Note 3 – Discontinued Operations
On January 30, 2014, we sold effectively all of the net operating assets of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations for $28 million in cash. Net proceeds from the sale, after post-closing adjustments and transaction costs, totaled $25.6 million. The transaction resulted in a pretax loss of $44.0 million and a tax benefit of $15.0 million, which were recorded in the year ended June 30, 2014. The financial results of these operations for 2014 are reported as discontinued operations. The discontinued operations, previously included in our Glassware and Candles segment, had net sales of $89.4 million and a pretax loss of $39.4 million, including the pretax loss on sale, for the year ended June 30, 2014.
 2018 2017
Acquisition-related contingent consideration at beginning of year$15,028
 $
Additions
 13,872
Changes in fair value included in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses2,052
 1,156
Acquisition-related contingent consideration at end of year$17,080
 $15,028

Note 4 – Long-Term Debt
At June 30, 2015,2018 and 2017, we had an unsecured credit facility (“Facility”) under which we could borrow, on a revolving credit basis, up to a maximum of $120 million at any one time, with potential to expand the total credit availability to $200 million subject to us obtaining consent of the issuing banks and certain other conditions.
On April 8, 2016, we entered into a new unsecured revolving credit facility (“New Credit Facility”), which replaced the facility discussed above. The material terms and covenants of the New Credit Facility are substantially similar to our previous credit facility.
The New Credit Facility provides that we may borrow, on a revolving credit basis, up to a maximum of $150 million at any one time, with potential to expand the total credit availability to $225 million subject to us obtaining consent of the issuing banks and certain other conditions. The New Credit Facility expires on April 8, 2021, and all outstanding amounts are then due and payable. Interest is variable based upon formulas tied to LIBOR or an alternative base rate defined in the New Credit Facility, at our option. We must also pay facility fees that are tied to our then-applicable consolidated leverage ratio. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. Due to the nature of its terms, when we have outstanding borrowings under the New Credit Facility, they will be classified as long-term debt.
At June 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, we had no borrowings outstanding under these facilities.the Facility. At June 30, 2016,2018, we had $4.7$5.1 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount available for borrowing on the New Credit Facility. We paid no interest in 20162018 and 2015.

35

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


2017.
The New Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions. There are two principal financial covenants: an interest expense test that requires us to maintain an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.5 to 1 at the end of each fiscal quarter; and an indebtedness test that requires us to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio not greater than 3 to 1 at all times. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBIT by Consolidated Interest Expense, and the leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Debt by Consolidated EBITDA. All financial terms used in the covenant calculations are defined more specifically in the New Credit Facility.


40

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 5 – Commitments
We have operating leases with initial noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year covering the rental of various facilities and equipment, which expire at various dates through fiscal year 2027. Certain of these leases contain renewal options, some provide options to purchase during the lease term and some require contingent rentals. The future minimum rental commitments due under these leases are summarized as follows:
  
2017$4,810
2018$4,277
2019$4,337
$6,839
2020$2,472
$4,736
2021$1,618
$3,475
2022$2,781
2023$1,493
Thereafter$5,789
$3,828
Total rent expense, including short-term cancelable leases, during the years ended June 30 is summarized as follows:
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Operating leases:          
Minimum rentals$5,298
 $5,036
 $5,079
$6,663
 $6,529
 $5,298
Contingent rentals11
 6
 86

 4
 11
Short-term cancelable leases1,611
 900
 793
1,257
 1,508
 1,611
Total$6,920
 $5,942
 $5,958
$7,920
 $8,041
 $6,920

Note 6 – Contingencies
In addition to the items discussed below, at June 30, 2016,2018, we were a party to various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters did not have a material effect on the current-year results of operations and, in our opinion, their ultimate disposition will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
21%With our acquisition of Angelic, we have a contingent liability recorded for the earn-out associated with the transaction. See further discussion in Note 3.
20% of our employees are represented under various collective bargaining contracts. We are currently renegotiating theThe labor contract for our Bedford Heights, OhioMilpitas, California plant facility, which produces various garlic bread products. This labor contract expiredsauce and dressing products, will expire on April 30, 2016. 7%December 15, 2018. 4% of our employees are represented under this collective bargaining contract. The labor contract for oneNone of our Columbus, Ohio plant facilities, which produces various dressing products, will expire on March 5, 2017. 9% of our employees are represented under this collective bargaining contract. While we believe that labor relations with employees underother collective bargaining contracts are satisfactory, a prolonged labor dispute could have a material effect on our business and results of operations.will expire within one year.


36

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 7 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
GoodwillAs described in Notes 1 and 10, we changed our reportable segments as of July 1, 2017 when our organizational structure changed. Using a relative fair value approach, we reassigned our existing goodwill balance to the two new reporting units that directly align with our new Retail and Foodservice reportable segments. Based on this approach, goodwill attributable to the Specialty Foods segmentRetail and Foodservice segments was $143.8$119.3 million and $48.7 million, respectively, at June 30, 20162018 and 2015.2017.
  

41

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The following table summarizes our identifiable other intangible assets all included in the Specialty Foods segment, at June 30.30:
2016 20152018 2017
Tradename (30-year life)   
Tradenames (20 to 30-year life)   
Gross carrying value$34,500
 $34,500
$50,321
 $50,321
Accumulated amortization(1,485) (365)(5,071) (3,130)
Net carrying value$33,015
 $34,135
$45,250
 $47,191
Trademarks (40-year life)   
Trademarks (27-year life)   
Gross carrying value$370
 $370
$370
 $370
Accumulated amortization(232) (223)(370) (241)
Net carrying value$138
 $147
$
 $129
Customer Relationships (10 to 15-year life)      
Gross carrying value$18,020
 $18,020
$14,207
 $14,207
Accumulated amortization(10,148) (8,882)(8,283) (7,160)
Net carrying value$7,872
 $9,138
$5,924
 $7,047
Technology / Know-how (10-year life)      
Gross carrying value$3,900
 $3,900
$6,350
 $6,350
Accumulated amortization(504) (114)(1,682) (1,047)
Net carrying value$3,396
 $3,786
$4,668
 $5,303
Non-compete Agreements (5-year life)      
Gross carrying value$600
 $600
$791
 $791
Accumulated amortization(155) (35)(457) (299)
Net carrying value$445
 $565
$334
 $492
Total net carrying value$44,866
 $47,771
$56,176
 $60,162
Amortization expense for our other intangible assets, which is reflected in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, was as follows in each of the years ended June 30:
 2016 2015 2014
Amortization expense$2,905
 $1,605
 $946
 2018 2017 2016
Amortization expense$3,986
 $3,453
 $2,905
Total annual amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be as follows:
  
2017$2,764
2018$2,764
2019$2,764
$3,858
2020$2,729
$3,823
2021$2,644
$3,738
2022$3,664
2023$3,105


37

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 8 – Liabilities
Accrued liabilities at June 30 were composed of:
 2016 2015
Compensation and employee benefits$21,565
 $21,969
Distribution4,450
 5,445
Other taxes1,266
 1,182
Marketing1,107
 1,830
Other4,684
 5,395
Total accrued liabilities$33,072
 $35,821
Other noncurrent liabilities at June 30 were composed of:
 2016 2015
Workers compensation$9,534
 $8,477
Gross tax contingency reserve1,599
 1,487
Pension benefit liability8,613
 5,070
Postretirement benefit liability939
 2,806
Deferred compensation and accrued interest4,655
 4,411
Other1,358
 1,403
Total other noncurrent liabilities$26,698
 $23,654

Note 9 – Income Taxes
We file a consolidated federal income tax return. Taxes based on income from continuing operations for the years ended June 30 have been provided as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Currently payable:     
Federal$57,116
 $47,601
 $48,718
State and local6,502
 5,229
 4,526
Total current provision63,618
 52,830
 53,244
Deferred federal, state and local (benefit) provision(749) 36
 (951)
Total taxes based on income$62,869
 $52,866
 $52,293
Certain tax benefits recorded directly to common stock for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Tax benefits recorded directly to common stock$1,417
 $563
 $1,020
For the years ended June 30, our effective tax rate varied from the statutory federal income tax rate as a result of the following factors:
 2016 2015 2014
Statutory rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State and local income taxes2.3
 2.2
 2.0
ESOP dividend deduction(0.4) (0.2) (0.2)
Domestic manufacturing deduction for qualified income(3.0) (3.0) (3.0)
Other0.2
 0.2
 0.3
Effective rate34.1 % 34.2 % 34.1 %
 2018 2017
Compensation and employee benefits$23,135
 $21,864
Distribution8,579
 7,711
Other taxes1,306
 1,266
Marketing485
 1,197
Other2,284
 3,232
Total accrued liabilities$35,789
 $35,270

3842

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


As referencedOther noncurrent liabilities at June 30 were composed of:
 2018 2017
Acquisition-related contingent consideration$17,080
 $15,028
Workers compensation12,850
 8,492
Deferred compensation and accrued interest4,611
 4,968
Pension benefit liability1,312
 4,344
Gross tax contingency reserve1,298
 1,241
Postretirement benefit liability926
 968
Other3,561
 3,557
Total other noncurrent liabilities$41,638
 $38,598

Note 9 – Income Taxes
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”) was signed into law on December 22, 2017 with an effective date of January 1, 2018. Most notably, the Tax Act reduced the statutory federal income tax rate for corporations from 35% to 21%. Since we file our tax return based on our fiscal year, the statutory federal income tax rate for our 2018 tax return will be a blended rate of 28.1%. In addition to the effect of the lower overall federal tax rate, the Tax Act resulted in a $9.5 million one-time benefit for the re-measurement of our net deferred tax liability in 2018.
The SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) on December 22, 2017. SAB 118 allows for a measurement period in which companies can either use provisional estimates for changes resulting from the Tax Act or apply the tax laws that were in effect immediately prior to the Tax Act being enacted if estimates cannot be determined at the time of the preparation of the financial statements until the actual impacts can be determined. We recorded an estimate of the impact of the Tax Act within our December 31, 2017 financial statements, including the impact of items recorded within accumulated other comprehensive loss. There were no material changes to these estimates in the six months ended June 30, 2018. We will continue to evaluate the impacts of the Tax Act and record adjustments, as needed, including adjustments related to the filing of our 2018 federal tax return, but do not expect material changes to the amounts recorded. In February 2018, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income/loss to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act. We recorded this reclassification in the quarter ended March 31, 2018. See further discussion under the caption “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards” in Note 1,1.
We file a consolidated federal income tax return. Taxes based on income for the years ended June 30 have been provided as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Currently payable:     
Federal$40,766
 $51,524
 $57,116
State and local7,355
 6,319
 6,502
Total current provision48,121
 57,843
 63,618
Deferred federal, state and local (benefit) provision(9,232) 2,359
 (749)
Total taxes based on income$38,889
 $60,202
 $62,869
In 2018, we adopted new accounting guidance for deferred taxesstock-based compensation. One of the changes resulting from this new guidance is the inclusion of the tax consequences related to stock-based compensation within the computation of income tax expense versus equity. We adopted this provision on a prospective basis. Prior to 2018, certain tax benefits were recorded directly to common stock, and these amounts totaled $1.1 million and $1.4 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

43

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


For the years ended June 30, our effective December 31, 2015. tax rate varied from the statutory federal income tax rate as a result of the following factors:
 2018 2017 2016
Statutory rate28.1 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State and local income taxes3.0
 2.4
 2.3
One-time benefit on re-measurement of net deferred tax liability(5.5) 
 
Domestic manufacturing deduction for qualified income(2.3) (2.8) (3.0)
Net windfall tax benefits - stock-based compensation(0.4) 
 
ESOP dividend deduction(0.1) (0.1) (0.4)
Other(0.5) (0.2) 0.2
Effective rate22.3 % 34.3 % 34.1 %
Our net deferred tax liability for all periods presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets has been classified as noncurrent. The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at June 30 were comprised of:
2016 20152018 2017
Deferred tax assets:      
Employee medical and other benefits$6,407
 $10,349
Receivables3,992
 5,314
Inventories$1,034
 $1,179
1,112
 1,041
Employee medical and other benefits12,533
 11,135
Receivable and other allowances5,626
 5,652
Other accrued liabilities1,740
 2,229
1,029
 1,905
Total deferred tax assets20,933
 20,195
12,540
 18,609
Deferred tax liabilities:      
Property, plant and equipment(21,573) (22,968)(15,551) (22,188)
Intangible assets(14,555) (15,223)(8,518) (14,070)
Goodwill(6,117) (4,869)(5,044) (7,092)
Other(121) (75)(231) (466)
Total deferred tax liabilities(42,366) (43,135)(29,344) (43,816)
Net deferred tax liability$(21,433) $(22,940)$(16,804) $(25,207)
Prepaid federal income taxes of $4.3$3.6 million and $3.8$6.1 million were included in Other Current Assets at June 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively. Prepaid state and local income taxes of $0.5 million and $0.6$0.9 million were included in Other Current Assets at June 30, 20162018 and 2015, respectively.2017.
CashNet cash payments for income taxes for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Cash payments for income taxes$62,901
 $43,027
 $37,277
 2018 2017 2016
Net cash payments for income taxes$46,198
 $59,008
 $62,901
The gross tax contingency reserve at June 30, 20162018 was $1.6$1.3 million and consisted of estimated tax liabilities of $1.0$0.7 million and interest and penalties of $0.6 million. The unrecognized tax benefits recorded as the gross tax contingency reserve noted in the following table for June 30, 20162018 and 20152017 would affect our effective tax rate, if recognized.

44

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The following table sets forth changes in our total gross tax contingency reserve (including interest and penalties):
2016 20152018 2017
Balance, beginning of year$1,487
 $963
$1,808
 $1,599
Tax positions related to the current year:      
Additions54
 54
12
 82
Reductions
 

 
Tax positions related to prior years:      
Additions121
 516
86
 153
Reductions(63) (46)(41) (26)
Lapse of statute of limitations(567) 
Settlements
 

 
Balance, end of year$1,599
 $1,487
$1,298
 $1,808
We have not classified any of the gross tax contingency reserve at June 30, 2016 as a current liability2018 in Accrued Liabilities as none of these amounts are expected to be resolved within the next 12 months. Consequently, the entire liability of $1.6$1.3 million was included in other noncurrent liabilities.Other Noncurrent Liabilities. We expect that the amount of these liabilities will change within the next 12 months; however, we do not expect the change to have a significant effect on our financial position or results of operations.
We recognize interest and penalties related to these tax liabilities in income tax expense. For each of the years ended June 30, we recognized the change in the accrual for net tax-related interest and penalties as follows:
 2016 2015
Expense recognized for net tax-related interest and penalties$92
 $87

39

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 2018 2017
(Benefit) expense recognized for net tax-related interest and penalties$(78) $112
We had accrued interest and penalties at June 30 as follows:
 2016 2015
Accrued interest and penalties included in the gross tax contingency reserve$571
 $479
 2018 2017
Accrued interest and penalties included in the gross tax contingency reserve$605
 $683
We file federal and various state and local income tax returns in the U.S. and various state and local jurisdictions.United States. With limited exceptions, we are no longer subject to examination of U.S. federal or state and local income taxes for years prior to 2013.2015.
The American Jobs Creation Act provided a tax deduction calculated as a percentage of qualified income from manufacturing in the United States. The deduction percentage for 20162018 was 9%. In accordance with FASB guidance, this deduction is treated as a special deduction, as opposed to a tax rate reduction and is properly reflected in the effective tax rate table. This deduction was repealed by the Tax Act. Therefore, 2018 is the final year that we will be able to claim this deduction.

Note 10 – Business Segment Information
Effective July 1, 2017, David A. Ciesinski, our President and Chief Operating Officer, succeeded John B. Gerlach, Jr. as CEO. As President and CEO, Mr. Ciesinski became our principal executive officer and CODM. This change resulted in modifications to the CODM’s approach to managing the business, assessing performance and allocating resources. Consequently, beginning on July 1, 2017, our segment reporting structure was amended to align with these changes, and our financial results are now presented as two reportable segments: Retail and Foodservice. Costs that are directly attributable to either Retail or Foodservice are charged directly to the appropriate segment. Costs that are deemed to be indirect, excluding corporate expenses and other unusual significant transactions, are allocated to the two reportable segments using a reasonable methodology that is consistently applied. All historical information was retroactively conformed to the current presentation. These segment changes had no effect on previously reported consolidated net sales, operating income, net income or earnings per share. We operatecontinue to evaluate our business in one reportable segment, “Specialty Foods.” Our management evaluates segment performancesegments based on net sales and operating income.
Retail - The vast majority of the products we sell in the Retail segment are sold through sales personnel, food brokers and distributors in the United States. We have placement of products in grocery produce departments through our refrigerated salad dressings, vegetable dips and fruit dips. Our flatbread products and sprouted grain bakery products are generally placed in the specialty bakery/deli section of the grocery store. We also have products typically marketed in the shelf-stable section of the grocery store, which include salad dressing, slaw dressing and croutons. Within the frozen food section of the grocery store, we have prominent market positions of frozen yeast rolls and garlic breads.

45

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Foodservice - The vast majority of the products we sell in the Foodservice segment are sold through sales personnel, food brokers and distributors in the United States. Most of the products we sell in the Foodservice segment are custom-formulated and include salad dressings, sandwich and dipping sauces, frozen breads and yeast rolls. The majority of our Foodservice sales are products sold under private label to restaurants. We also manufacture and sell various branded Foodservice products.
Within our organization, our procurement, manufacturing, warehousing and distribution activities are substantially integrated across our operations in order to maximize efficiency and productivity, as many of our products are similar between the two segments. Consequently, we do not prepare, and the CODM does not review, separate balance sheets for the reportable segments. As such, our external reporting does not include the presentation of identifiable assets, capital expenditures or depreciation and amortization by reportable segment.
The following table sets forth information with respect to the amount of net sales contributed by each class of similar products of our consolidated net sales in each of the years ended June 30:
 2016 2015 2014
Specialty Foods     
Non-frozen$818,716
 $741,726
 $681,872
Frozen372,393
 362,788
 359,203
Total$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
Our Corporate Expensesinclude various expenses of a general corporate nature, as well as costs related to certain divested or closed nonfood operations, including the expense associated with retirement plans applicable to those closed units, and therefore have not been allocated to the Specialty Foods segment.
 2018 2017 2016
Retail     
Frozen breads$252,186
 $253,965
 $240,799
Refrigerated dressings, dips and other226,276
 221,422
 212,640
Shelf-stable dressings and croutons171,772
 166,030
 165,945
Total Retail net sales$650,234
 $641,417
 $619,384
Foodservice     
Dressings and sauces$430,944
 $427,017
 $435,747
Frozen breads and other141,747
 133,408
 135,978
Total Foodservice net sales$572,691
 $560,425
 $571,725
Total net sales$1,222,925
 $1,201,842
 $1,191,109

4046

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The following sets forth certain additional financial segment information of continuing operationsattributable to our reportable segments, certain amounts not allocated among our reportable segments and amounts retained at the corporate level for the years ended June 30 and certain items retained at the corporate level:30:
2016 2015 2014
     2018 2017 2016
Net Sales (1) (2)
$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
     
Retail$650,234
 $641,417
 $619,384
Foodservice572,691
 560,425
 571,725
Total$1,222,925
 $1,201,842
 $1,191,109
Operating Income (2)
          
Specialty Foods$196,592
 $167,095
 $165,383
Corporate Expenses(12,022) (12,234) (11,616)
Retail$126,391
 $138,470
 $134,900
Foodservice58,432
 66,216
 61,692
Multiemployer Pension Settlement and Related Costs
 (17,635) 
Corporate Expenses (3)
(12,716) (12,303) (12,022)
Total$184,570
 $154,861
 $153,767
$172,107
 $174,748
 $184,570
Identifiable Assets (1) (3)
     
Specialty Foods$515,553
 $514,605
 $405,416
Identifiable Assets (1) (4)
     
Retail & Foodservice (5)
$589,509
 $577,509
 $515,553
Corporate119,179
 187,551
 221,885
214,982
 138,896
 119,179
Total$634,732
 $702,156
 $627,301
$804,491
 $716,405
 $634,732
Capital Expenditures          
Specialty Foods$16,652
 $18,230
 $15,578
Retail & Foodservice (5)
$31,025
 $26,031
 $16,652
Corporate19
 68
 67

 974
 19
Total$16,671
 $18,298
 $15,645
$31,025
 $27,005
 $16,671
Depreciation and Amortization          
Specialty Foods$24,001
 $20,929
 $18,785
Retail & Foodservice (5)
$26,685
 $24,752
 $24,001
Corporate146
 182
 208
211
 154
 146
Total$24,147
 $21,111
 $18,993
$26,896
 $24,906
 $24,147
(1)Net sales and long-lived assets are predominately domestic.
(2)All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
(3)Segment
Our Corporate Expensesinclude various expenses of a general corporate nature, as well as costs related to certain divested or closed nonfood operations, including the expense associated with retirement plans applicable to those closed units. By their very nature, these costs have not been allocated to the Retail and Foodservice segments.
(4)Retail and Foodservice identifiable assets include those assets used in itsour operations and other intangible assets allocated to purchased businesses. Corporate assets consist principally of cash and equivalents. The declineincrease in Corporate identifiable assets from June 30, 20152017 to June 30, 2018 was primarily due to the increase in cash and equivalents. The increase in Retail and Foodservice identifiable assets from June 30, 2016 to June 30, 2017 was due to the decrease in cash resulting from the paymentacquisition of the December 2015 special dividend.Angelic.
(5)As discussed above, we do not present identifiable assets, capital expenditures or depreciation and amortization by reportable segment.
NetRetail segment net sales attributable to Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”) and Foodservice segment net sales attributable to McLane Company, Inc. (“McLane”), a wholesale distribution subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Net sales to McLane$232,241
 $202,218
 $186,817
As a percentage of consolidated net sales19% 18% 18%
Net sales to Wal-Mart$189,417
 $177,354
 $175,388
As a percentage of consolidated net sales16% 16% 17%
Accounts receivable attributable to Wal-Mart and McLane at June 30 as a percentage of consolidated accounts receivable were as follows:
 2016 2015
Wal-Mart25% 26%
McLane17% 14%

 2018 2017 2016
Net sales to Walmart$209,860
 $201,484
 $189,417
As a percentage of consolidated net sales17% 17% 16%
Net sales to McLane$185,226
 $198,153
 $232,241
As a percentage of consolidated net sales15% 16% 19%

4147

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Accounts receivable attributable to Walmart and McLane at June 30 as a percentage of consolidated accounts receivable were as follows:
 2018 2017
Walmart28% 26%
McLane11% 12%

Note 11 – Stock-Based Compensation
Our shareholders previously approved the adoption of and subsequent amendments to the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan reserved 2,000,000 common shares for issuance to our employees and directors. As the 2005 Plan expired in May 2015, we obtained shareholder approval of the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) at our November 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2015 Plan did not affect any currently outstanding equity awards granted under the 2005 Plan. The 2015 Plan reserved 1,500,000 common shares for issuance to our employees and directors. All awards granted under these plans will be exercisable at prices not less than fair market value as of the date of the grant. The vesting period for awards granted under these plans varies as to the type of award granted, but generally these awards have a maximum term of five years.
We adopted new accounting guidance for stock-based compensation on July 1, 2017. See further discussion in Note 1. We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period of the grant. Compensation expense is reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification. We record tax benefits and excess tax benefits related to stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSSARs”) and restricted stock awards. These excess tax benefits are included in the financingoperating section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As needed, weWe estimate a forfeiture rate for our SSSARs and restricted stock grants based on historical experience.
Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights
We use periodic grants of SSSARs as a vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. We calculate the fair value of SSSARs grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Our policy is to issue shares upon SSSARs exercise from new shares that had been previously authorized.
In 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, we granted SSSARs to various employees under the terms of the plans. The following table summarizes information relating to these grants:
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
SSSARs granted240
 149
 146
185
 166
 240
Weighted average grant date fair value per right$12.23
 $9.94
 $11.84
$17.85
 $17.59
 $12.23
Weighted average assumptions used in fair value calculations:          
Risk-free interest rate0.86% 0.86% 0.75%2.39% 1.36% 0.86%
Dividend yield1.93% 2.02% 1.97%1.98% 1.64% 1.93%
Volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock20.88% 19.62% 22.35%22.57% 22.41% 20.88%
Weighted average expected life in years2.69
 2.71
 3.12
Expected life in years2.85
 2.47
 2.69
For these grants, the volatility factor was estimated based on actual historical volatility of our stock for a time period equal to the term of the SSSARs. The expected average life was determined based on historical exercise experience for this type of grant. The SSSARs we grant vest one-third on the first anniversary of the grant date, one-third on the second anniversary of the grant date and one-third on the third anniversary of the grant date.
The following table summarizes our continuing operations SSSARs compensation expense and tax benefits recorded for each of the years ended June 30:
 2016 2015 2014
Compensation expense$1,472
 $1,288
 $1,092
Tax benefits$515
 $451
 $382
Intrinsic value of exercises$3,788
 $1,162
 $2,692
Excess tax benefits$1,341
 $410
 $942
The total fair values of SSSARs vested for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Fair value of vested rights$1,192
 $1,252
 $1,145
 2018 2017 2016
Compensation expense$2,455
 $1,882
 $1,472
Tax benefits$690
 $659
 $515
Intrinsic value of exercises$2,381
 $2,281
 $3,788
Excess tax benefits$669
 $798
 $1,341

4248

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The total fair values of SSSARs vested for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Fair value of vested rights$2,330
 $1,916
 $1,192
 The following table summarizes the activity relating to SSSARs granted under the plans for the year ended June 30, 2016:2018:
Number of
Rights
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Number of
Rights
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding at beginning of year395
 $84.24
  521
 $109.70
  
Exercised(180) $79.11
  (105) $93.67
  
Granted240
 $103.87
  185
 $121.09
  
Forfeited(20) $88.72
  (15) $115.85
  
Outstanding at end of year435
 $97.01
 3.97 $13,302
586
 $115.99
 3.42 $13,156
Exercisable and vested at end of year62
 $84.26
 2.52 $2,673
225
 $107.41
 2.54 $6,986
Vested and expected to vest at end of year408
 $96.74
 3.93 $12,594
562
 $116.31
 3.42 $12,423
The following table summarizes information about the SSSARs outstanding by grant year at June 30, 2016:2018:
 Outstanding Exercisable Outstanding Exercisable
     Weighted Average         Weighted Average    
Grant Years 
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number
Outstanding
 
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
 
Exercise
Price
 
Number
Exercisable
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number
Outstanding
 
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
 
Exercise
Price
 
Number
Exercisable
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
2018 $117.76-$124.29 181 4.65 $121.09  $—
2017 $121.54-$138.96 159 3.67 $134.01 54 $134.03
2016 $101.70-$112.62 240 4.68 $103.87  $— $101.70-$112.62 172 2.70 $104.73 97 $105.26
2015 $91.13 113 3.65 $91.13 20 $91.13 $91.13 63 1.65 $91.13 63 $91.13
2014 $79.78-$89.29 64 2.65 $89.11 24 $89.07 $89.29 11 0.66 $89.29 11 $89.29
2013 $72.67 7 1.66 $72.67 7 $72.67
2012 $63.50-$68.12 11 0.65 $68.12 11 $68.12
At June 30, 2016,2018, there was $3.1$4.7 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to SSSARs that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of 2 years.
Restricted Stock
We use periodic grants of restricted stock as a vehicle for rewarding our nonemployee directors and certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value.
In 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, we granted shares of restricted stock to various employees under the terms of the plans. The following table summarizes information relating to these grants:
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Employees          
Restricted stock granted28
 9
 24
27
 12
 28
Grant date fair value$2,923
 $845
 $2,190
$3,218
 $1,591
 $2,923
Weighted average grant date fair value per award$102.89
 $91.13
 $89.21
$121.09
 $134.07
 $102.89
The restricted stock under these employee grants vests on the third anniversary of the grant date. Under the terms of our grants, employees receive dividends on unforfeited restricted stock regardless of their vesting status. In 2016, 2015 and 2014, 6,000, 20,000 and 6,000 shares, respectively,

49

Table of employee restricted stock vested.Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


In 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, we also granted shares of restricted stock to our nonemployee directors under the terms of the plans. The following table summarizes information relating to each of these grants:
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Nonemployee directors          
Restricted stock granted6
 7
 6
6
 5
 6
Grant date fair value$639
 $639
 $490
$759
 $759
 $639
Weighted average grant date fair value per award$112.05
 $92.92
 $84.42
$123.11
 $138.96
 $112.05

43

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The 20162018 grant vests over a one-year period, and all of these shares are expected to vest. Dividends earned on the stock during the vesting period will be paid to the directors at the time the stock vests. In 2016, 2015 and 2014, 7,000, 6,000 and 7,000 shares, respectively, of nonemployee director restricted stock vested, and the directors were paid the related dividends.
The following table summarizes our continuing operations restricted stock compensation expense and tax benefits recorded for each of the years ended June 30:
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Compensation expense$1,854
 $1,752
 $1,434
$2,584
 $2,366
 $1,854
Tax benefits$649
 $613
 $502
$726
 $828
 $649
Excess tax benefits$76
 $153
 $78
$92
 $325
 $76
The total fair values of restricted stock vested for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Fair value of vested shares$1,124
 $1,836
 $931
 2018 2017 2016
Fair value of vested shares$1,508
 $2,420
 $1,124
The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock granted under the plans for the year ended June 30, 2016:2018:
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Unvested restricted stock at beginning of year45
 $87.71
52
 $111.87
Granted34
 $104.43
33
 $121.47
Vested(13) $83.59
(13) $110.60
Forfeited(3) $86.48
(4) $107.86
Unvested restricted stock at end of year63
 $97.71
68
 $116.99
At June 30, 2016,2018, there was $3.5$4.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of 2 years.

Note 12 – Pension Benefits
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
We sponsor multiple defined benefit pension plans that covered certain workers under collective bargaining contracts. However, as a result of prior-years’ restructuring activities, for all periods presented, we no longer have any active employees continuing to accrue service cost or otherwise eligible to receive plan benefits. Benefits being paid under the plans are primarily based on negotiated rates and years of service. We contribute to these plans at least the minimum amount required by regulation.
At the end of the year, we discount our plan liabilities using an assumed discount rate. In estimating this rate, we, along with our third-party actuaries, review the timing of future benefit payments, bond indices, consider yield curve analysis results and the past history of discount rates.
The actuarial present value of benefit obligations summarized below was based on the following assumption:
 2016 2015
Weighted-average assumption as of June 30   
Discount rate3.39% 4.12%
The net periodic benefit costs were determined utilizing the following beginning-of-the-year assumptions:
2016 2015 20142018 2017
Weighted-average assumption as of June 30   
Discount rate4.12% 4.02% 4.57%4.07% 3.68%
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.00% 7.00% 7.00%

4450

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The net periodic benefit costs were determined utilizing the following beginning-of-the-year assumptions:
 2018 2017 2016
Discount rate3.68% 3.39% 4.12%
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.00% 7.00% 7.00%
In determining the long-term expected return on plan assets, we consider our related investment guidelines, our expectations of long-term rates of return by asset category, our target asset allocation weighting and historical rates of return and volatility for equity and fixed income investments. The investment strategy for plan assets is to control and manage investment risk through diversification among asset classes, investment managers/funds and investment styles. The plans’ investment guidelines have been designed to meet the intended objective that plan assets earn at least nominal returns equal to or in excess of the plans’ liability growth rate. In consideration of the current average age of the plans’ participants, the investment guidelines are based upon an investment horizon of at least 10 years.
The target and actual asset allocations for our plans at June 30 by asset category were as follows:
Target Percentage
of Plan Assets at
June 30
 Actual Percentage of Plan Assets
Target Percentage
of Plan Assets at
June 30
 Actual Percentage of Plan Assets
2016 2016 20152018 2018 2017
Cash and equivalents0%-10% 2% 2%0%-10% 5% 3%
Equity securities30%-70% 50
 49
30%-70% 51
 49
Fixed income30%-70% 48
 49
30%-70% 44
 48
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Our target asset allocations are maintained through ongoing review and periodic rebalancing of equity and fixed income investments with assistance from an independent outside investment consultant. Also, the plan assets are diversified among asset classes, asset managers or funds and investment styles to avoid concentrations of risk. We expect that a modest allocation to cash will exist within the plans because each investment manager is likely to hold limited cash in a portfolio.
We categorize our plan assets within a three-level fair value hierarchy, as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted market pricespreviously defined in active markets for identical assets.
Level 2 – Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
Note 3. The following table summarizes the fair values and levels, within the fair value hierarchy, for our plan assets at June 30:
June 30, 2016June 30, 2018
Asset CategoryLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and equivalents$557
 $
 $
 $557
$547
 $
 $
 $547
Money market funds267
 
 
 267
1,331
 
 
 1,331
U.S. government obligations
 4,785
 
 4,785

 3,344
 
 3,344
Municipal obligations
 139
 
 139

 36
 
 36
Corporate obligations
 2,927
 
 2,927

 3,176
 
 3,176
Mortgage obligations
 1,998
 
 1,998

 2,354
 
 2,354
Mutual funds fixed income7,135
 
 
 7,135
7,044
 
 
 7,044
Mutual funds equity17,874
 
 
 17,874
18,881
 
 
 18,881
Total$25,833
 $9,849
 $
 $35,682
$27,803
 $8,910
 $
 $36,713
              
June 30, 2015June 30, 2017
Asset CategoryLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and equivalents$522
 $
 $
 $522
$472
 $
 $
 $472
Money market funds181
 
 
 181
599
 
 
 599
U.S. government obligations
 4,266
 
 4,266

 3,598
 
 3,598
Municipal obligations
 161
 
 161

 36
 
 36
Corporate obligations
 3,174
 
 3,174

 3,805
 
 3,805
Mortgage obligations
 1,857
 
 1,857

 2,199
 
 2,199
Mutual funds fixed income8,820
 
 
 8,820
8,109
 
 
 8,109
Mutual funds equity18,165
 
 
 18,165
17,951
 
 
 17,951
Total$27,688
 $9,458
 $
 $37,146
$27,131
 $9,638
 $
 $36,769

4551

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The plan assets classified at Level 1 include money market funds and mutual funds. Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets are available for investments in this category.
The plan assets classified at Level 2 include fixed income securities consisting of government securities, municipal obligations, corporate obligations and mortgage obligations. For these types of securities, market prices are observable for identical or similar investment securities but not readily accessible for each of those investments individually at the measurement date. For these assets, we obtain pricing information from an independent pricing service. The pricing service uses various pricing models for each asset class that are consistent with what other market participants would use. The inputs and assumptions to the model of the pricing service are derived from market observable sources including as applicable: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data including market research publications.
Relevant information with respect to our pension benefits as of June 30 can be summarized as follows:
2016 20152018 2017
Change in benefit obligation      
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$42,042
 $41,233
$40,941
 $44,152
Interest cost1,685
 1,612
1,463
 1,457
Actuarial loss2,683
 1,414
Actuarial gain(3,070) (2,297)
Benefits paid(2,258) (2,217)(2,442) (2,371)
Benefit obligation at end of year$44,152
 $42,042
$36,892
 $40,941
2016 20152018 2017
Change in plan assets      
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$37,146
 $38,725
$36,769
 $35,682
Actual return on plan assets794
 638
2,366
 3,458
Employer contributions
 
20
 
Benefits paid(2,258) (2,217)(2,442) (2,371)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$35,682
 $37,146
$36,713
 $36,769
2016 20152018 2017
Reconciliation of funded status      
Net accrued benefit cost$(8,470) $(4,896)$(179) $(4,172)
2016 20152018 2017
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of      
Prepaid benefit cost (noncurrent assets)$143
 $174
Accrued benefit liability (noncurrent liabilities)(8,613) (5,070)
Prepaid benefit cost (Other Noncurrent Assets)$1,133
 $172
Accrued benefit liability (Other Noncurrent Liabilities)(1,312) (4,344)
Net amount recognized$(8,470) $(4,896)$(179) $(4,172)
 2016 2015
Accumulated benefit obligation$44,152
 $42,042
 2018 2017
Accumulated benefit obligation$36,892
 $40,941
The following table discloses, in the aggregate, those plans with benefit obligations in excess of the fair value of plan assets at the June 30 measurement date:
2016 20152018 2017
Benefit obligations$41,301
 $38,980
$6,012
 $38,236
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$32,688
 $33,910
$4,700
 $33,892

4652

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30 were as follows:
2016 20152018 2017
Net actuarial loss$20,434
 $16,564
$12,821
 $16,380
Income taxes(7,550) (6,120)(2,996) (6,052)
Total$12,884
 $10,444
$9,825
 $10,328
The amount in accumulated other comprehensive loss expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost during the next fiscal year is as follows:
 2017
Net actuarial loss$715
 2019
Net actuarial loss$447
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit income for our pension plans at June 30:
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Components of net periodic benefit income          
Interest cost$1,685
 $1,612
 $1,754
$1,463
 $1,457
 $1,685
Expected return on plan assets(2,520) (2,632) (2,457)(2,491) (2,416) (2,520)
Amortization of unrecognized net loss539
 429
 460
572
 715
 539
Settlement charge42
 
 
Net periodic benefit income$(296) $(591) $(243)$(414) $(244) $(296)
We have not yet finalized our anticipated funding level for 2017,2019, but based on initial estimates, we do not expect to make anyour 2019 contributions to our pension plans during 2017.to be material.
Benefit payments estimated for future years are as follows:
  
2017$2,325
2018$2,333
2019$2,352
$2,364
2020$2,394
$2,383
2021$2,424
$2,389
2022 - 2026$12,664
2022$2,401
2023$2,396
2024 - 2028$12,057

Note 13 – Postretirement Benefits
Postretirement Medical and Life Insurance Benefit Plans
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We recognize the cost of benefits as the employees render service. Postretirement benefits are funded as incurred. At the end of the year, we discount our plan liabilities using an assumed discount rate. In estimating this rate, we, along with our third-party actuaries, review the projected timing of future benefit payments, bond indices, consider yield curve analysis results and the past history of discount rates.
In the quarter ended December 31, 2015, we terminated the medical benefits offered under the plans. The reduction in these benefits was accounted for as a negative plan amendment and resulted in the subsequent remeasurement of our benefit obligation. The remeasurement reduced the net periodic benefit cost for 2016 compared to the amount expected prior to the remeasurement.
Additional disclosures for postretirement benefits have not been presented herein as these disclosures are no longer considered material following the termination of medical benefits described above.


47

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 1413 – Defined Contribution and Other Employee Plans
Company-Sponsored Defined Contribution Plans
We sponsored four defined contribution plans established pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code during 2016.2018. Contributions are determined under various formulas, and we contributed to two of thethese plans in 2016.2018. Costs related to such plans for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Costs related to defined contribution plans$992
 $888
 $808
 2018 2017 2016
Costs related to company-sponsored defined contribution plans$1,352
 $1,111
 $992
Multiemployer Plans
CertainIn the three years ended June 30, 2018, certain of our subsidiaries participateparticipated in multiemployer plans that provide pension benefits to retiree workers under collective bargaining contracts at such locations. These plans generally provide for retirement, death and/or termination benefits for eligible employees within the applicable collective bargaining contract, based on specific eligibility/participation requirements, vesting periods and benefit formulas. The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects: (1) assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers, (2) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers and (3) if we choosea participating employer chooses to stop participating in any of ourthe multiemployer plans, weplan, it may be required to pay those plansthe plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.

53

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


In 2017 the employees at our Bedford Heights, Ohio plant voted to ratify a new collective bargaining agreement. Among other terms, the new agreement provided for our complete withdrawal from the underfunded multiemployer Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund. As settlement of our portion of underfunded pension benefits of the multiemployer plan, we paid $17.0 million in 2017 for a full withdrawal from the plan.
Our participation in thesemultiemployer pension plans for the annual periodthree years ended June 30, 20162018 is reflected in the following table. All information in the table is as of December 31 of the relevant year, except contributions which are based on our fiscal year, or except as otherwise noted. The EIN-PN column provides the Employer Identification Number (“EIN”) and the Plan Number (“PN”). The pension protection act zone status is based on information that we received from the plan. Among other factors, generally, plans in critical status (red zone) are less than 65 percent funded, plans in endangered or seriously endangered status (yellow zone or orange zone, respectively) are less than 80 percent funded, and plans at least 80 percent funded are said to be in the green zone. The FIP/RP status pending/implemented column indicates plans for which a funding improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”) is either pending or has been implemented by the trustees of each plan. ThereExcept as noted below regarding contributions to the Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, there have been no significant changes that affect the comparability of 2016, 20152018, 2017 or 20142016 contributions.
   
Pension Protection
Act Zone Status
   
Fiscal Year
Contributions
       
Pension Protection
Act Zone Status
   
Fiscal Year
Contributions (1)
    
Plan Name EIN/PN 2015 2014 
FIP/RP Status
Pending /
Implemented
 2016 2015 2014 
Surcharge
Imposed
 
Expiration
Date of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
 EIN/PN 2017 2016 
FIP/RP Status
Pending /
Implemented
 2018 2017 2016 
Surcharge
Imposed
 
Expiration
Date of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund(2) 34-0904419-001 Red
12/31/14
 Red
12/31/13
 Yes,
Implemented
 $1,605
 $1,501
 $1,332
 No 4/30/2016 34-0904419-001 Red
12/31/16
 Red
12/31/15
 Yes,
Implemented
 $
 $2,098
 $1,605
 No n/a
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan 91-6145047-001 Green
12/31/14
 Green
12/31/13
 No 420
 440
 397
 No 12/15/2018 91-6145047-001 Green
12/31/16
 Green
12/31/15
 No 356
 409
 420
 No 12/15/2018
Total contributions to multiemployer plans $2,025
 $1,941
 $1,729
  $356
 $2,507
 $2,025
 
(1)Contributions do not include payments related to multiemployer pension withdrawals/settlements.
(2)As discussed above, we withdrew from this plan in 2017 and did not make any contributions in 2018. Our 2017 contributions included amounts related to a new collective bargaining contract.
Our contributions to the Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund exceeded 5% of the total contributions to the plan in the plan yearsyear ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.2016.
In addition to pension benefits provided underUnder these two multiemployer plans, we also contribute amounts for health and welfare benefits that are defined by each plan. These benefits are not vested. The contributions required by our participation in these plans for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Multiemployer health and welfare plan contributions$3,559
 $3,796
 $3,367
 2018 2017 2016
Multiemployer health and welfare plan contributions$3,167
 $3,570
 $3,559

48

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amountsWe also began to make non-elective contributions for the union employees at our Bedford Heights, Ohio plant into a union-sponsored multiemployer 401(k) plan following our withdrawal from the underfunded Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund in thousands, except per share data)


2017. Our contributions totaled $0.7 million and $0.8 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, including $0.6 million to initially fund this 401(k) plan in 2017.
Deferred Compensation Plan
We offer a deferred compensation plan for select employees who may elect to defer a certain percentage of annual compensation. We do not match any contributions. Each participant earns interest based upon the prime rate of interest, adjusted semi-annually, on their respective deferred compensation balance. Participants are paid out upon retirement or termination.termination in accordance with their annual election.
The following table summarizes our liability for total deferred compensation and accrued interest at June 30:
 2016 2015
Liability for deferred compensation and accrued interest$4,655
 $4,411
 2018 2017
Liability for deferred compensation and accrued interest$4,611
 $4,968

54

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Deferred compensation expense for each of the years ended June 30 was as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Deferred compensation expense$151
 $136
 $131
 2018 2017 2016
Deferred compensation expense$210
 $170
 $151

Note 1514 – Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Fiscal Year
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Fiscal Year
2016         
2018         
Net Sales$294,085
 $324,769
 $287,765
 $284,490
 $1,191,109
$298,916
 $319,665
 $296,174
 $308,170
 $1,222,925
Gross Profit$67,967
 $83,594
 $72,924
 $75,144
 $299,629
$75,477
 $83,941
 $67,913
 $76,182
 $303,513
Net Income(1)$27,628
 $34,511
 $29,011
 $30,614
 $121,764
$29,386
 $45,920
 $27,621
 $32,387
 $135,314
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share (1)
$1.01
 $1.25
 $1.06
 $1.12
 $4.44
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share (1) (3)
$1.07
 $1.67
 $1.00
 $1.18
 $4.92
                  
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Fiscal Year
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Fiscal Year
2015         
2017         
Net Sales$259,987
 $303,411
 $263,400
 $277,716
 $1,104,514
$291,361
 $326,773
 $293,834
 $289,874
 $1,201,842
Gross Profit$57,424
 $78,653
 $56,625
 $64,990
 $257,692
$80,634
 $93,739
 $71,905
 $72,486
 $318,764
Net Income(2)$22,761
 $32,954
 $20,403
 $25,568
 $101,686
$33,400
 $38,956
 $14,471
 $28,487
 $115,314
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share (1)
$0.83
 $1.20
 $0.75
 $0.93
 $3.72
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share (2) (3)
$1.22
 $1.42
 $0.53
 $1.04
 $4.20
(1)Included in the second quarter net income was the one-time preliminary deferred tax benefit of $8.9 million, or approximately $0.32 per diluted share, resulting from the Tax Act. The fiscal year impact was $9.5 million, or approximately $0.35 per diluted share.
(2)Included in the third quarter and fiscal year net income was expense of $11.5 million, net of taxes, or approximately $0.42 per diluted share, related to a multiemployer pension settlement and other benefit-related costs.
(3)Diluted net income per common share amounts are calculated independently for each of the quarters presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly net income per common share amounts may not agree with the fiscal year.


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management must apply its judgment in evaluating the cost–benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2016.2018.
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:
1.Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
2.Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors; and
3.Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of an unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is only possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the most recent year.
Our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. Their opinion, as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, is stated in their report, which is set forth on the following page.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Lancaster Colony Corporation
Columbus, Ohio
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Lancaster Colony Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2016,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2018, of the Company and our report dated August 27, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended June 30, 2016, of the Company and our report dated August 24, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Columbus, Ohio
August 24, 201627, 2018


Item 9B. Other Information
None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information regarding our directors and executive officers, including the identification of the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee financial expert, is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our definitive proxy statement for our November 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“20162018 Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act.
The information regarding Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance is incorporated by reference to the material under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.
The information regarding changes, if any, in procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.
The information regarding our Code of Business Ethics is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information regarding executive officer and director compensation is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.
The information regarding Compensation Committee interlocks and insider participation and the Compensation Committee Report is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information regarding fees paid to and services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal years ended June 30, 20162018 and 20152017 and the pre-approval policies and procedures of the Audit Committee is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 20162018 and 20152017 and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2016,2018, together with the report thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated August 24, 2016,27, 2018, are included in Item 8 of this report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 20162018 and 20152017
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended June 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended June 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules. Included in Part IV of this report is the following additional financial data that should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this report:
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
Supplemental schedules not included with the additional financial data have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.related amounts are immaterial for all periods presented.
(a) (3) Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and Item 15(b). See Index to Exhibits following “Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.”Exhibits.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION
(Registrant)
  
By:/s/ JOHN B. GERLACH, JR.DAVID A. CIESINSKI
 John B. Gerlach, Jr.David A. Ciesinski
 Chairman,President, Chief Executive Officer
 and Director
  
Date:August 24, 201627, 2018
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
     
Signatures  Title Date
     
/s/ JOHN B. GERLACH, JR.DAVID A. CIESINSKI Chairman,President, Chief Executive Officer August 24, 201627, 2018
John B. Gerlach, Jr.David A. Ciesinski and Director  
  (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ DOUGLAS A. FELLJOHN B. GERLACH, JR.  Treasurer, Vice President,Executive Chairman of the Board August 24, 201627, 2018
Douglas A. FellJohn B. Gerlach, Jr.  Assistant Secretaryand Director  
 
/s/ DOUGLAS A. FELLVice President, Assistant SecretaryAugust 27, 2018
Douglas A. Fell  and Chief Financial Officer  
   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ JAMES B. BACHMANN  Director August 17, 201622, 2018
James B. Bachmann     
     
/s/ NEELI BENDAPUDI  Director August 12, 201622, 2018
Neeli Bendapudi     
     
/s/ WILLIAM H. CARTER  Director August 17, 201622, 2018
William H. Carter     
     
/s/ KENNETH L. COOKE  Director August 17, 201622, 2018
Kenneth L. Cooke     
     
/s/ ROBERT L. FOX  Director August 17, 201622, 2018
Robert L. Fox     
     
/s/ ALAN F. HARRIS  Director August 17, 201622, 2018
Alan F. Harris     
     
/s/ ROBERT P. OSTRYNIEC  Director August 17, 201622, 2018
Robert P. Ostryniec     
     
/s/ ZUHEIR SOFIA  Director August 17, 201622, 2018
Zuheir Sofia     

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2016

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E
Description Balance at Beginning of Year Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses Additions Charged to Other Accounts (A) Deductions (B) Balance at End of Year
Reserves deducted from asset to which they apply - Allowance for doubtful accounts (amounts in thousands):          
Year Ended June 30, 2014 $340
 $96
 $
 $4
 $432
Year Ended June 30, 2015 $432
 $(263) $41
 $4
 $206
Year Ended June 30, 2016 $206
 $(10) $
 $71
 $125
Notes:
(A)Represents balance acquired in 2015 acquisition of Flatout.
(B)Represents uncollectible accounts written-off net of recoveries.




LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-K
JUNE 30, 20162018
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 
Exhibit
Number
  Description
   
2.1  Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as
2.2First Amendment, dated as of September 30, 2015, to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2015, by and among T. Marzetti Company, as Buyer, Flatout Holdings, Inc., as the Company, the shareholders of the Company, as Sellers, and NCP-Flatout Seller Rep LLC, as Sellers’ Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (000-04065), filed November 3, 2015).
2.3Asset Purchase Agreement Between Lancaster Colony Corporation and CL Products International, LLC, dated as of January 30, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed January 30, 2014).
3.1Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Lancaster Colony Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K (000-04065), filed February 9, 2009)3, 2017).
  
  
  
  
  
 
   
  
  
10.2(a)
  
  
10.3(a)
  
  
10.4(a)
  
  
10.5(a)
  
   
10.6(a)
  
  
10.7(a)
  
  
10.8(a)
  
  
10.9(a)
  
  
  Amended and Restated Key Employee Severance Agreement, dated December 3, 2008, between Lancaster Colony Corporation and Bruce L. Rosa (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (000-04065), filed February 9, 2009).

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.11(a)
Description of Executive Bonus Arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (000-04065), filed September 10, 2004).
   
10.1210.11(a)
  
   
10.1310.12(a)
 

Exhibit
Number
Description
   
21*  Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23*Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1*
  
31.2*  
  
32*
32**
  
  
101.INS*  XBRL Instance Document
  
101.SCH*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
  
101.CAL*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
  
101.DEF*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
  
101.LAB*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
  
101.PRE*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
   
   
(a) Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any Director or any Executive Officer participates.
   
* Filed herewith
   
** Furnished herewith
 

5762