UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011

Commission File Number 0-09115

MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA	25-0644320
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

TWO NORTHSHORE CENTER, PITTSBURGH, PA	15212-5851
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code

(412) 442-8200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, $1.00 par value		NASDAQ Global Select Market System

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405a of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x

No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the Class A Common Stock outstanding and held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of the Class A Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market System on March 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately ~~$871 million.~~$1.1 billion.

As of October 31, ~~2010,~~2011, shares of common stock outstanding were: Class A Common Stock ~~29,480,063~~28,439,802 shares

Documents incorporated by reference: Specified portions of the Proxy Statement for the ~~2011~~2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

The index to exhibits is on pages 75-76.

PART I

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION:

Any forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (specifically those contained in Item 1, "Business", Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations") are included in this report pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of Matthews International Corporation (“Matthews” or the “Company”) in future periods to be materially different from management's expectations. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such ~~f orward-looking~~forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove correct. Factors that could cause the Company's results to differ materially from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements principally include changes in domestic or international economic conditions, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in the cost of materials used in the manufacture of the Company’s products, changes in death rates, changes in product demand or pricing as a result of consolidation in the industries in which the Company operates, changes in product demand or pricing as a result of domestic or international competitive pressures, unknown risks in connection with the Company's acquisitions and technological factors beyond the Company's control. In addition, although the Company does not have any customers that would be considered individually significant to consolidated sales, changes in the distribution of the Company’s ~~produc ts~~products or the potential loss of one or more of the Company’s larger customers are also considered risk factors.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Matthews, founded in 1850 and incorporated in Pennsylvania in 1902, is a designer, manufacturer and marketer principally of memorialization products and brand solutions. Memorialization products consist primarily of bronze and granite memorials and other memorialization products, caskets and cremation equipment for the cemetery and funeral home industries. Brand solutions include graphics imaging products and services, marking products, and merchandising solutions. The Company's products and operations are comprised of six business segments: Bronze, Casket, Cremation, Graphics Imaging, Marking Products and Merchandising Solutions. The Bronze segment is a leading manufacturer of cast bronze and granite memorials and other memorialization products, cast and etched architectural products and is a leading builder of mausoleums in the United States. The Casket segment is a leading casket manufacturer and distributor in North America and produces a wide variety of wood and metal caskets. The Cremation segment is a leading designer and manufacturer of cremation equipment ~~and cremation caskets primarily~~ in North ~~America.~~America and Europe. The Graphics Imaging segment manufactures and provides brand solutions, printing plates, gravure cylinders, pre-press services and imaging services for the primary packaging and corrugated industries. The Marking Products segment designs, manufactures and distributes a wide range of marking and coding equipment and consumables, ~~and~~ industrial automation products and order fulfillment systems that are used for identifying, tracking and conveying various consumer and industrial products, components and packaging containers. The Merchandising Solutions segment designs and manufactures merchandising displays and systems and provides creative merchandising and marketing solutions services.

At October 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries had approximately ~~4,900~~5,300 employees. The Company's principal executive offices are located at Two NorthShore Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, its telephone number is

(412) 442-8200 and its internet website is www.matw.com. The Company files all required reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in accordance with the Exchange Act. These reports are available free of charge on the Company’s website as soon as practicable after being filed or furnished to the SEC. The reports filed with the SEC are also available to read and copy at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 or by contacting the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. All reports filed with the SEC can be found on its website at www.sec.gov.

The following table sets forth reported sales and operating profit for the Company's business segments for the past three fiscal years. Detailed financial information relating to business segments and to domestic and international operations is presented in Note 16 (“Segment Information”) to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS, ~~continued~~(continued)

		Years Ended September 30,																Years Ended September 30,
		2010					2009						2008					2011		2010		2009
		Amount		Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount	Percent	Amount	Percent	Amount	Percent
		(Dollars in Thousands)																(Dollars in Thousands)
Sales to unaffiliated customers:	Sales to unaffiliated customers:																	Sales to unaffiliated customers:
Memorialization:
Bronze		$	224,247		27.3	%	$	215,934			27.7	%	$	243,063		29.7	%	$224,773	25.0%	$224,247	27.3%	$215,934	27.7%
Casket			210,279		25.6			203,247			26.0			219,792		26.8		238,753	26.6	210,279	25.6	203,247	26.0
Cremation			39,356		4.8			30,909			4.0			26,665		3.3		43,816	4.9	39,356	4.8	30,909	4.0
			473,882		57.7			450,090			57.7			489,520		59.8		507,342	56.5	473,882	57.7	450,090	57.7
Brand Solutions:
Graphics Imaging			239,957		29.2			234,966			30.1			203,703		24.9		268,975	29.9	239,957	29.2	234,966	30.1
Marking Products			51,069		6.2			42,355			5.4			60,031		7.3		61,938	6.9	51,069	6.2	42,355	5.4
Merchandising Solutions			56,921		6.9			53,497			6.8			65,369		8.0		60,566	6.7	56,921	6.9	53,497	6.8
			347,947		42.3			330,818			42.3			329,103		40.2		391,479	43.5	347,947	42.3	330,818	42.3
Total		$	821,829		100.0	%	$	780,908			100.0	%	$	818,623		100.0	%	$898,821	100.0%	$821,829	100.0%	$780,908	100.0%

Operating profit:		��
Memorialization:
Bronze		$	56,167		48.2	%	$	57,598			57.0	%	$	71,576		53.8	%	$52,474	44.3%	$56,167	48.2%	$57,598	57.0%
Casket			26,242		22.5			17,716			17.5			23,339		17.6		26,785	22.6	26,242	22.5	17,716	17.5
Cremation			4,910		4.2			5,036			5.0			5,474		4.1		5,733	4.8	4,910	4.2	5,036	5.0
			87,319		74.9			80,350			79.5			100,389		75.5		84,992	71.7	87,319	74.9	80,350	79.5
Brand Solutions:
Brand Solutions:
Graphics Imaging			21,077		18.1			19,217			19.0			18,617		14.0		22,427	18.9	21,077	18.1	19,217	19.0
Marking Products			5,817		5.0			1,500			1.5			9,137		6.9		7,819	6.6	5,817	5.0	1,500	1.5
Merchandising Solutions			2,368		2.0			(56	)		-			4,809		3.6		3,278	2.8	2,368	2.0	(56)	-
			29,262		25.1			20,661			20.5			32,563		24.5		33,524	28.3	29,262	25.1	20,661	20.5
Total		$	116,581		100.0	%	$	101,011			100.0	%	$	132,952		100.0	%	$118,516	100.0%	$116,581	100.0%	$101,011	100.0%

In fiscal ~~2010,~~2011, approximately ~~64%~~62% of the Company's sales were made from the United States, and ~~32%~~33%, 2%, 1%2% and 1% were made from Europe, ~~Canada,~~ Australia, Asia and ~~Asia,~~Canada, respectively. For further information on Segments, see Note 16 (“Segment Information”) in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” on ~~pages 61 and~~page 62 of this report. Bronze segment products are sold throughout the world with the segment's principal operations located in the United States, Europe, Canada, and Australia. Casket segment products are primarily sold in North America. Cremation segment products and services are sold primarily in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Products and services of the Graphics Imaging segment are sold primarily in Europe, the United States and Asia. The Marking Products segment sells equipment and consumables directly to industrial consumers and distributors in the United States and internationally through the Company's subsidiaries in Canada, Sweden and China, and through other foreign distributors. Matthews owns a minority interest in Marking Products distributors in Asia, Australia and Europe. Merchandising Solutions segment products and services are sold principally in the United States.

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS, ~~continued~~(continued)

MEMORIALIZATION PRODUCTS AND MARKETS:

Bronze:

The Bronze segment manufactures and markets a full line of memorialization products used primarily in cemeteries. The segment's products, which are sold principally in the United States, Europe, Canada and Australia, include cast bronze memorials, granite memorials and other memorialization products. The segment also manufactures and markets architectural products that are produced from bronze, aluminum and other metals, which are used to identify or commemorate people, places, events and accomplishments.

Memorial products, which comprise the majority of the Bronze segment's sales, include flush bronze and granite memorials, upright granite memorials and monuments, cremation memorialization products, granite benches, flower vases, crypt plates and letters, cremation urns, niche units, cemetery features and statues, along with other related products and services. Flush ~~bronze~~ memorials are bronze plaques or granite memorials which contain personal information about a deceased individual (such as name, birth date, and death date), photos and emblems. Flush bronze and granite memorials are even or "flush" with the ground and therefore are preferred by many cemeteries for easier mowing and general maintenance. The segment's memorial products also include community and family mausoleums. Matthews is a leading builder of ~~mausoleum s~~mausoleums within North America. In addition, the segment’s other memorial products include bronze plaques, letters, emblems, vases, lights and photoceramics that can be affixed to granite monuments, mausoleums, crypts and flush memorials. Principal customers for memorial products are cemeteries and memorial parks, which in turn sell the Company's products to the consumer.

Customers of the Bronze segment can also purchase memorials and vases on a “pre-need” basis. The “pre-need” concept permits families to arrange for these purchases in advance of their actual need. Upon request, the Company will manufacture the memorial to the customer’s specifications (e.g., name and birth date) and place it in storage for future delivery. All memorials in storage have been paid in full with title conveyed to each pre-need purchaser.

The Bronze segment manufactures a full line of memorial products for cremation, including urns in a variety of sizes, styles and shapes as well as standard and custom designed granite cremation pedestals and benches. The segment also manufactures bronze and granite niche units, which are comprised of numerous compartments used to display cremation urns in mausoleums and churches. In addition, the Company also markets turnkey cremation gardens, which include the design and all related products for a cremation memorial garden. As part of the Memorialization group, the segment works with ~~casket~~the Casket and ~~cremation~~Cremation segments to provide a total solution to customers that own and operate businesses in both the cemetery and funeral home markets.

Architectural products include cast bronze and aluminum plaques, etchings and letters that are used to recognize, commemorate and identify people, places, events and accomplishments. The Company's plaques are frequently used to identify the name of a building or the names of companies or individuals located within a building. Such products are also used to commemorate events or accomplishments, such as military service or financial donations. The principal markets for the segment's architectural products are corporations, fraternal organizations, contractors, churches, hospitals, schools and government agencies. These products are sold to and distributed through a network of independent dealers including sign suppliers, awards and recognition companies, and trophy dealers.

Raw materials used by the Bronze segment consist principally of bronze and aluminum ingot, granite, sheet metal, coating materials, photopolymers and construction materials and are generally available in adequate supply. Ingot is obtained from various North American, European and Australian smelters.

Competition from other cemetery product manufacturers is on the basis of reputation, product quality, delivery, price, and design availability. The Company believes that its superior quality, broad product lines, innovative designs, delivery capability, customer responsiveness, experienced personnel and consumer-oriented merchandising systems are competitive advantages in its markets. Competition in the mausoleum construction industry includes various construction companies throughout North America and is on the basis of design, quality and price. Competitors in the architectural market are numerous and include companies that manufacture cast and painted signs, plastic materials, sand-blasted wood and other fabricated products.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS, ~~continued~~(continued)

Casket:

The Casket segment is a leading manufacturer and distributor of caskets and other funeral home products in North America. The segment produces ~~two types of caskets:~~and markets metal and ~~wood.~~wood caskets. The Casket segment also manufactures and distributes cremation caskets. Caskets can be customized with many different options such as color, interior design, handles and trim in order to accommodate specific religious, ethnic or other personal preferences. The segment also markets other funeral home products such as urns, jewelry, stationery and other funeral home products and supplies. The segment offers individually personalized caskets and urns through the Company-owned distribution network.

Metal caskets are made from various gauges of cold-rolled steel, stainless steel, copper and bronze. Metal caskets are generally categorized by whether the casket is non-gasketed or gasketed, and by material (i.e., bronze, copper, or steel) and in the case of steel, by the gauge (thickness) of the metal. Cremation caskets are made primarily from wood or cardboard covered with cloth or veneer. These caskets appeal primarily to cremation consumers, the environmentally concerned, and value buyers.

The segment's wood caskets are manufactured from nine different species of wood, as well as from veneer. The species of wood used are poplar, pine, ash, oak, pecan, maple, cherry, walnut and mahogany. The Casket segment is a leading manufacturer of all-wood constructed caskets, which are manufactured using pegged and dowelled construction, and include no metal parts. All-wood constructed caskets are preferred by certain religious groups.

The segment also produces casket components. Casket components include stamped metal parts, metal locking mechanisms for gasketed metal caskets, adjustable beds, interior panels and plastic ornamental hardware for the exterior of the casket. Metal casket parts are produced by stamping cold-rolled steel, stainless steel, copper and bronze sheets into casket body parts. Locking mechanisms and adjustable beds are produced by stamping and assembling a variety of steel parts. Certain ornamental hardware styles are produced from injection molded plastic. The segment purchases from sawmills and lumber distributors various species of uncured wood, which it dries and cures. The cured wood is ~~pro cessed~~processed into casket components.

The segment provides product and service assortment planning and merchandising and display products to funeral service businesses. These products assist funeral service professionals in providing information, value and satisfaction to their client families.

The primary materials required for casket manufacturing are cold-rolled steel and lumber. The segment also purchases copper, bronze, stainless steel, corrugated materials, cloth, ornamental hardware and coating materials. Purchase orders or supply agreements are typically negotiated with large, integrated steel producers that have demonstrated timely delivery, high quality material and competitive prices. Lumber is purchased from a number of sawmills and lumber distributors. The Company purchases most of its lumber from sawmills within 150 miles of its wood casket manufacturing facility in York, Pennsylvania.

The segment markets its casket products in the United States through a combination of Company-owned and independent casket distribution facilities. The Company operates approximately 60 distribution centers in the United States. Over ~~85%~~70% of the segment’s casket products are currently sold through Company-owned distribution centers. As part of the Memorialization group, the segment works with ~~bronze~~the Bronze and ~~cremation~~Cremation segments to provide a total solution to customers that own and operate businesses in both the cemetery and funeral home ~~markets~~.markets.

The casket business is highly competitive. The segment competes with other manufacturers on the basis of product quality, price, service, design availability and breadth of product line. The segment provides a line of casket products that it believes is as comprehensive as any of its major competitors. There are a large number of casket industry participants operating in North America, and the industry has recently seen a few new foreign casket manufacturers, primarily from China, enter the North American market. The Casket segment and its two largest competitors account for a substantial portion of the finished caskets produced and sold in North America.

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS, ~~continued~~(continued)

Cremation:

The Cremation segment ~~has four principal~~provides six distinct, complementary, groups of products and services: ~~cremation equipment, cremation caskets, equipment service~~

·	Cremation Equipment

·	Service and Supplies

·	Environmental Systems

·	Crematory Management/Operations

·	Cremation Columbarium and Niche Units

·	Cremation Urns and Memorial Products

Servicing both the human and ~~supplies,~~pet markets, the segment’s primary market areas are North America and ~~cremation urns and memorial products.~~Europe. The ~~Cremation~~ segment also ~~provides environmental systems (such as emissions filtration units~~sells into Latin America and ~~bio-mass incinerators), crematory operations~~the Caribbean, Australia and ~~management services, and cremation columbarium and niche units.~~Asia.

Cremation equipment ~~consists primarily of~~includes both traditional flame-based and water-based bio-cremation systems for cremation of humans and pets, as well as equipment for processing the cremated remains and other related equipment such as handling equipment (ventilated work stations, tables, cooler racks, vacuums). ~~Cremation equipment also includes water-based bio-cremation systems.~~ The principal markets for these products are funeral homes, cemeteries, crematories, pet crematories, animal disposers and veterinarians. These products are marketed ~~primarily within North America, Europe, Australia and Asia.~~

Cremation casket products include five primary types: Cloth-covered wood, cloth-covered cardboard, veneer-covered wood, veneer-covered cardboard and basic corrugated containers. These caskets appeal primarily to cremation families, the environmentally concerned and value buyers. The principal market for these products is funeral homes. These products are marketed through company-owned distribution centers operatedmostly direct by ~~the Casket~~ segment ~~and independent distributors.~~personnel.

Crematory service and supplies consist of preventative maintenance and “at need” service work performed on various makes and models of cremation equipment. This work can be as simple as replacing defective bulbs or as complex as complete reconstruction and upgrading or retro-fitting on site. The principal markets for these services are the owners and operators of cremation equipment. Cremation supplies are consumable items associated with the cremation operations. Supplies could include operator safety equipment, identification discs, ~~and~~ combustible roller ~~tubes.~~tubes, as well as products such as plastic temporary cremation containers, pans and brushes used in the process.

Environmental systems include emissions filtration units, waste heat recovery equipment, waste gas treatment products, as well as waste reduction equipment and bio-mass incinerators. The principal markets are the cremation industry, waste to energy and other industries which utilize incinerators for waste reduction and energy production.

Crematory management/operations represents the actual operation and management of client-owned crematories.

Cremation columbarium and niche units are produced by the segment for the placement/display of urns and other containers of cremated remains. The principal markets targeted by the segment include church and university markets, affinity groups and other emerging memorialization markets.

Cremation urns and memorialization products include urns which support various forms of memorialization (burial, niche, scattering, and home décor). Merchandise includes any other family-related products such as cremation jewelry, mementos, remembrance products and other assorted at-need merchandise.

Raw materials used by the Cremation segment consist principally of structural steel, sheet metal, electrical components, ~~cloth, wood, particleboard, corrugated materials, paper veneer~~combustion devices and ~~masonry materials and~~refractory materials. These are generally available in adequate supply from numerous suppliers.

The Company competes with several manufacturers in the cremation and accessory equipment market principally on the basis of product design, quality and price. The Cremation segment and its three largest global competitors account for a substantial portion of the U.S. and European cremation equipment market. The cremation casket business is highly competitive. The segment competes with other cremation casket manufacturers on the basis of product quality, price and design availability. Although there are a large number of casket industry participants, the Cremation segment and its two largest competitors account for a substantial portion of the cremation caskets sold in the United States.

Historically, the segment's cremation casket operations have experienced seasonal variations. Generally, sales are higher in the second quarter and lower in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. These fluctuations are due in part to the seasonal variance in the U. S. death rate, with a greater number of deaths generally occurring in cold weather months.

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS, ~~continued~~(continued)

BRAND SOLUTIONS PRODUCTS AND MARKETS:

Graphics Imaging:

The Graphics Imaging segment provides brand management, pre-press services, printing plates and cylinders, embossing tools, and creative design services principally to the primary packaging and corrugated industries. The primary packaging industry consists of manufacturers of printed packaging materials such as boxes, flexible packaging, folding cartons and bags commonly seen at retailers of consumer goods. The corrugated packaging industry consists of manufacturers of printed corrugated containers. Other major industries served include the wallpaper, flooring, automotive, and textile industries.

The principal products and services of this segment include brand management, pre-press graphics services, printing plates, gravure cylinders, steel bases, embossing tools, special purpose machinery, engineering assistance, print process assistance, print production management, digital asset management, content management, and package design. These products and services are used by brand owners and packaging manufacturers to develop and print packaging graphics that identify and help sell the product in the marketplace. Other packaging graphics can include nutritional information, directions for product use, consumer warning statements and UPC codes. The primary packaging manufacturer produces printed packaging from paper, film, foil and other composite materials used to display, protect and market the product. ~~Th e~~The corrugated packaging manufacturer produces printed containers from corrugated sheets. Using the Company's products, these sheets are printed and die cut to make finished containers.

The segment offers a wide array of value-added services and products. These include print process and print production management services; print engineering consultation; pre-press preparation, which includes computer-generated art, film and proofs; plate mounting accessories and various press aids; and rotary and flat cutting dies used to cut out intricately designed containers and point-of-purchase displays. The segment also provides creative digital graphics services to brand owners and packaging markets.

The Company works closely with manufacturers to provide the proper printing forms and tooling used to print the packaging to the user's specifications. The segment's printing plate products are made principally from photopolymer resin and sheet materials. Upon customer request, plates can be pre-mounted press-ready in a variety of configurations that maximize print quality and minimize press set-up time. Gravure cylinders, manufactured from steel, copper and chrome, can be custom engineered for multiple print processes.

The Graphics Imaging segment customer base consists primarily of brand owners and packaging industry converters. Brand owners are generally large, well-known consumer products companies and retailers with a national or global presence. These types of companies tend to purchase their graphics needs directly and supply the printing forms, or the electronic files to make the printing plates and gravure cylinders, to the packaging printer for their products. The Graphics Imaging segment serves customers primarily in Europe, the United States and Asia. ~~In Europe, the segment has its principal operations in Germany, the United Kingdom, Poland and Austria.~~

Major raw materials for this segment's products include photopolymers, steel, copper, ~~steel,~~ film and graphic art supplies. All such materials are presently available in adequate supply from various industry sources.

The Graphics Imaging segment is one of several manufacturers of printing plates and cylinders and providers of pre-press services with an international presence. The segment competes in a fragmented industry consisting of a few multi-plant regional printing form suppliers and a large number of local single-facility companies located across Europe and the United States. The combination of the Company's Graphics Imaging business in Europe, the United States and Asia is an important part of Matthews’ strategy to become a worldwide leader in the graphics industry and service multinational customers on a global basis. Competition is on the basis of product quality, timeliness of delivery and price. The Company differentiates itself from the competition by consistently meeting these customer demands, its ability to service customers both nationally and globally, and its ability to provide value-added services.

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS, ~~continued~~(continued)

Marking Products:

The Marking Products segment designs, manufactures and distributes a wide range of ~~marking and coding products~~equipment and related consumables ~~as well as industrial automation products. The Company’s products are~~ used by manufacturers and suppliers to identify, track, and ~~convey~~brand their ~~products and packaging.~~products. Marking products can range from a ~~simple hand stamp~~mechanical marking solution to microprocessor-based ink-jet printing ~~systems. Coding~~ systems ~~often~~that can integrate into the customer’s manufacturing, inventory tracking and ~~conveyance~~material handling control systems. The Company manufactures and markets products and systems that employ ~~the following~~different marking ~~methods to meet customer needs:~~technologies including contact printing, indenting, etching, laser, and ink-jet printing. Customers will often use a combination of these methods in order to achieve an appropriate mark. These methods apply product information required for identification and traceability as well as to facilitate inventory and quality control, regulatory compliance and brand name communication.

~~The segment’s industrial automation~~Other solutions provided by the Company complement the tracking and distribution of customer’s products ~~are based upon embedded control architecture to create~~and include order fulfillment systems, motor-driven rollers and controls for material handling systems, and other innovative custom solutions that address specific customer requirements. Some of the industries for which custom products are produced include oil exploration, material handling and security scanning. Material handling industry customers include some of the largest automated assembly, distribution and mail sorting companies in the United States.

A significant portion of the revenue of the Marking Products segment is attributable to the sale of consumables and replacement parts in connection with the marking, coding and tracking hardware sold by the Company. The Company develops inks, rubber and steel consumables in harmony with the marking equipment in which they are used, which is critical to assure ongoing equipment reliability and mark quality. Many marking equipment customers also use the Company's inks, solvents and cleaners.

The principal customers for the Company's marking products are manufacturers of durable goods and building products, consumer goods manufacturers, including food and beverage processors and producers of ~~pharmaceuticals, and manufacturers of durable goods and building products.~~pharmaceuticals. The Company also serves a wide variety of industrial markets, including metal fabricators, manufacturers of woven and non-woven fabrics, plastic, rubber and automotive products.

A portion of the segment's sales are outside the United States and are distributed through the Company's subsidiaries in Canada, Sweden, Germany and China in addition to other international distributors. Matthews owns a minority interest in distributors in Asia, Australia and Europe.

The marking products industry is diverse, with companies either offering limited product lines for well-defined specialty markets, or similar to the Company, offering a broad product line and competing in various product markets and countries. In the United States, the Company has manufactured and sold marking products and related consumable items since 1850.

Major raw materials for this segment's products include precision components, electronics, printing components, tool steels, rubber and chemicals, all of which are presently available in adequate supply from various sources.

Competition for marking products is based on product performance, integration into the manufacturing process, service and price. The Company normally competes with specialty companies in specific brand marking solutions and traceability applications. The Company believes that, in general, it offers one of the broadest lines of ~~marking~~ products to address a wide variety of marking, coding and tracking applications.

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS, ~~continued~~(continued)

Merchandising Solutions:

The Merchandising Solutions segment provides merchandising and printing solutions for brand owners and retailers. The segment designs, manufactures and installs merchandising and display systems, and provides total turnkey project management services. The segment also provides creative merchandising and marketing solutions services.

The majority of the segment’s sales are derived from the design, engineering, manufacturing and installation of merchandising and display systems. These systems include permanent and temporary displays, custom store fixtures, brand concept shops, interactive kiosks, custom packaging, and screen and digitally printed promotional signage. Design and engineering services include concept and model development, graphics design and prototyping. Merchandising and display systems are manufactured to specifications developed by the segment in conjunction with the customer. These products are marketed and sold primarily in the United States.

The segment operates in a fragmented industry consisting primarily of a number of small, locally operated companies. Industry competition is intense and the segment competes on the basis of reliability, creativity and providing a broad array of merchandising products and services. The segment is unique in its ability to provide in-depth marketing and merchandising services as well as design, engineering and manufacturing capabilities. These capabilities allow the segment to deliver complete turnkey merchandising solutions quickly and cost effectively.

Major raw materials for the segment’s products include wood, particleboard, corrugated materials, structural steel, plastic, laminates, inks, film and graphic art supplies. All of these raw materials are presently available in adequate supply from various sources.

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND LICENSES:

The Company holds a number of domestic and foreign patents and trademarks. However, the Company believes the loss of any or a significant number of patents or trademarks would not have a material impact on consolidated operations or revenues.

BACKLOG:

Because the nature of the Company's Bronze, Graphics Imaging and Merchandising Solutions businesses are primarily custom products made to order with short lead times, backlogs are not generally material except for mausoleums in the Bronze ~~segment and engineered equipment projects in the Graphics Imaging~~ segment. Backlogs vary in a range of approximately one year of sales for mausoleums. Backlogs for the Casket segment and the cremation casket businesses are not material. Cremation equipment sales backlogs vary in a range of eight to ten months of sales. Backlogs generally vary in a range of up to four weeks of sales in the Marking Products segment. The Company’s backlog is expected to be substantially filled in fiscal ~~2011.~~2012.

REGULATORY MATTERS:

The Company's operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations impose limitations on the discharge of materials into the environment and require the Company to obtain and operate in compliance with conditions of permits and other government authorizations. As such, the Company has developed environmental, health and safety policies and procedures that include the proper handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials.

The Company is party to various environmental matters. These include obligations to investigate and mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal of certain materials at various operating and non-operating sites. The Company is currently performing environmental assessments and remediation at these sites, as appropriate. In addition, prior to its acquisition, The York Group, Inc. was identified, along with others, by the Environmental Protection Agency as a potentially responsible party for remediation of a

landfill site in York, Pennsylvania. At this time, the Company has not been joined in any lawsuit or administrative order related to the site or its clean-up.

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS, ~~continued~~(continued)

At September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, an accrual of approximately ~~$6.8~~$6.2 million had been recorded for environmental remediation (of which ~~$828,000~~$788,000 was classified in other current liabilities), representing management's best estimate of the probable and reasonably estimable costs of the Company's known remediation obligations. The accrual does not consider the effects of inflation and anticipated expenditures are not discounted to their present value. While final resolution of these contingencies could result in costs different than current accruals, management believes the ultimate outcome will not have a significant effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There are inherent risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s businesses that could adversely affect its operating performance and financial condition. Set forth below are descriptions of those risks and uncertainties that the Company currently believes to be material. Additional risks not currently known or deemed immaterial may also result in adverse effects on the Company.

Changes in Economic Conditions. Generally, changes in domestic and international economic conditions affect the industries in which the Company and its customers and suppliers operate. These changes include changes in the rate of consumption or use of the Company’s products due to economic downturns, volatility in currency exchange rates, and changes in raw material prices resulting from supply and/or demand conditions.

Uncertainty about current global economic conditions poses a risk, as consumers and businesses may continue to postpone or cancel spending. Other factors that could influence customer spending include energy costs, conditions in the credit markets, consumer confidence and other factors affecting consumer spending behavior. These and other economic factors could have an effect on demand for the Company’s products and services and negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. Manufacturing and sales of a significant portion of the Company’s products are outside the United States, and accordingly, the Company holds assets, incurs liabilities, earns revenue and pays expenses in a variety of currencies. The Company’s consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, and therefore, the Company must translate the reported values of its foreign assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses into U.S. dollars. Increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies may negatively affect ~~t he~~the value of these items in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, even though their value has not changed in local currency.

Increased Prices for Raw Materials. The Company’s profitability is affected by the prices of the raw materials used in the manufacture of its products. These prices may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including changes in supply and demand, domestic and global economic conditions, and volatility in commodity markets, currency exchange rates, labor costs and fuel-related costs. If suppliers increase the price of critical raw materials, alternative sources of supply, or an alternative material, may not exist.

The Company has standard selling price structures (i.e., list prices) in several of its segments, which are reviewed for adjustment generally on an annual basis. In addition, the Company has established pricing terms with several of its customers through contracts or similar arrangements. Based on competitive market conditions and to the extent that the Company has established pricing terms with customers, the Company’s ability to immediately increase the price of its products to offset the increased costs may be limited. Significant raw material price increases that cannot be mitigated by selling price increases or productivity improvements will negatively affect the Company’s results of operations.

ITEM ~~1. BUSINESS, continued~~1A. RISK FACTORS, (continued)

Changes in Mortality and Cremation Rates. Generally, life expectancy in the United States and other countries in which the Company’s Memorialization businesses operate has increased steadily for several decades and is expected to continue to do so in the future. The increase in life expectancy is also expected to impact the number of deaths in the future. Additionally, cremations have steadily grown as a percentage of total deaths in the United States since the 1960’s, and are expected to continue to increase in the future. The Company expects that these trends will continue in the future, and the result may affect the volume of bronze memorialization products and ~~b urial~~burial caskets sold in the United States. However, sales of the Company’s Cremation segment may benefit from the growth in cremations.

Changes in Product Demand or Pricing. The Company’s businesses have and will continue to operate in competitive markets. Changes in product demand or pricing are affected by domestic and foreign competition and an increase in consolidated purchasing by large customers operating in both domestic and global markets. The Memorialization businesses generally operate in markets with ample supply capacity and demand which is correlated to death rates. The Brand Solutions businesses serve global customers that are requiring their suppliers to be global in scope and price competitive. Additionally, in recent years the Company has witnessed an increase in products manufactured offshore, primarily in China, and imported into the Company’s U.S. markets. ; It is expected that these trends will continue and may affect the Company’s future results of operations.

Risks in Connection with Acquisitions. The Company has grown in part through acquisitions, and continues to evaluate acquisition opportunities that have the potential to support and strengthen its businesses. There is no assurance however that future acquisition opportunities will arise, or that if they do, that they will be consummated. In addition, acquisitions involve inherent risks that the businesses acquired will not perform in accordance with expectations, or that synergies expected from the integration of the acquisitions will not be achieved as rapidly as expected, if at all. Failure to effectively integrate acquired businesses could prevent the realization of expected rates of ~~r eturn~~return on the acquisition investment and could have a negative effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Technological Factors Beyond the Company’s Control. The Company operates in certain markets in which technological product development contributes to its ability to compete effectively. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to develop new products, that new products can be manufactured and marketed profitably, or that new products will successfully meet the expectations of customers.

Changes in the Distribution of the Company’s Products or the Loss of a Large Customer. Although the Company does not have any customer that is considered individually significant to consolidated sales, it does have contracts with several large customers in both the Memorialization and Brand Solutions businesses. While these contracts provide important access to large purchasers of the Company’s products, they can obligate the Company to sell products at contracted prices for extended periods of time. Additionally, any significant divestiture of business properties or operations by current customers could result in a loss of business if the Company is not able to maintain the ~~b usiness~~business with the subsequent owners of the properties.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Principal properties of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries as of October 31, ~~2010~~2011 were as follows (properties are owned by the Company except as noted):

Location	Description of Property
Bronze:
Pittsburgh, PA	Manufacturing / Division Offices
Kingwood, WV	Manufacturing
Melbourne, Australia	Manufacturing	(1)
Monterrey, Mexico Parma, Italy	Manufacturing Manufacturing / Warehouse	(1) (1)
Searcy, AR	Manufacturing
Whittier, CA	Manufacturing	(1)

Casket ~~(2)~~(2):
Monterrey, Mexico	Manufacturing	(1)
Richmond, IN	Manufacturing	(1)
Richmond, IN	Manufacturing / Metal Stamping
Richmond, IN	Injection Molding	(1)
York, PA	Manufacturing

Cremation:
Apopka, FL	Manufacturing / Division Offices
Richmond, IN	Manufacturing	(1)
Manchester, England Udine, Italy	Manufacturing Manufacturing	(1) (1)
Graphics Imaging:
Pittsburgh, PA	Manufacturing / Division Offices
Julich, Germany	Manufacturing / Division Offices
Atlanta, GA	Manufacturing
~~Beverly,~~Woburn, MA	Manufacturing	(1)
Bristol, England	Manufacturing
Goslar, Germany	Manufacturing	(1)
Leeds, England	Manufacturing	(1)
Monchengladbach, Germany	Manufacturing
Munich, Germany	Manufacturing	(1)
Nuremberg, Germany	Manufacturing	(1)
Oakland, CA	Manufacturing	(1)
Poznan, Poland	Manufacturing
St. Louis, MO	Manufacturing
Shenzhen, China	Manufacturing	(1)
Vienna, Austria	Manufacturing	(1)
Vreden, Germany	Manufacturing
Wan Chai, Hong Kong	Manufacturing	(1)
Izmir, Turkey	Manufacturing

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES, (continued)

Location	Description of Property

Marking Products:
Pittsburgh, PA	Manufacturing / Division Offices
Gothenburg, Sweden	Manufacturing / Distribution	(1)
Tualatin, OR	Manufacturing	(1)
Beijing, China	Manufacturing	(1)
Ixonia, WI	Manufacturing	(1)

~~ITEM 2.~~

~~PROPERTIES, continued~~

~~Location~~Germantown, WI	~~Description of Property~~Manufacturing	(1)

Merchandising Solutions:
East Butler, PA	Manufacturing / Division Offices
Portland, OR	Sales Office	(1)

Corporate Office:
Pittsburgh, PA	General Offices

(1)	These properties are leased by the Company under operating lease arrangements. Rent expense incurred by the Company for all leased facilities was approximately ~~$13.0~~$15.2 million in fiscal ~~2010.~~2011.

(2)	In addition to the properties listed, the Casket division leases warehouse facilities totaling approximately ~~900,000~~1.0 million square feet in 2527 states under operating leases.

All of the owned properties are unencumbered. The Company believes its facilities are generally well suited for their respective uses and are of adequate size and design to provide the operating efficiencies necessary for the Company to be competitive. The Company's facilities provide adequate space for meeting its near-term production requirements and have availability for additional capacity. The Company intends to continue to expand and modernize its facilities as necessary to meet the demand for its products.

~~ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.~~

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Matthews is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Management does not expect that the results of any of these legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on Matthews’ financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal ~~2010.~~2011.

OFFICERS AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT OF THE REGISTRANT

The following information is furnished with respect to officers and executive management as of October 31, ~~2010:~~2011:

Name	Age	Positions with Registrant

Joseph C. Bartolacci	5051	President and Chief Executive Officer

David F. Beck	5859	Vice President and Controller

Jennifer A. Ciccone	4344	Vice President, Human Resources

~~James P. Doyle~~	59	~~Group President, Memorialization~~

Brian J. Dunn	5354	Group President, Brand Solutions

Steven D. Gackenbach	48	Group President, Memorialization

Steven F. Nicola	5051	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

Paul F. Rahill	5354	President, Cremation Division

~~Franz J. Schwarz~~	62	~~President, Graphics Europe~~

Brian D. Walters	4142	Vice President and General Counsel

Joseph C. Bartolacci was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer effective October 1, 2006. He had been President and Chief Operating Officer since September 1, 2005. Mr. Bartolacci was elected to the Board of Directors on November 15, 2005. He had been President, Casket Division since February 2004 and Executive Vice President of Matthews since January 1, 2004.

David F. Beck was appointed Vice President and Controller effective February 18, 2010. Prior thereto he had been Controller since September 15, 2003.

Jennifer A. Ciccone was appointed Vice President, Human Resources effective February 19, 2009. Prior thereto, Ms. Ciccone had been Director, Corporate Human Resources since 2006. ~~Ms. Ciccone joined the Company in 1998 and has held various managerial positions within the Company’s Human Resources Department.~~

~~James P. Doyle~~ joined the Company as Group President, Memorialization in December 2006. Prior to joining Matthews, he served as President, Kohler Engine Business (a manufacturer of air and liquid-cooled four cycle engines), a division of Kohler Company, from 2004 to 2006.

Brian J. Dunn was appointed Group President, Brand Solutions effective February 18, 2010. Prior thereto, he was appointed Group President, Graphics and Marking Products effective September 1, 2007 and had been President, Marking Products Division prior thereto.

Steven D. Gackenbach was appointed Group President, Memorialization effective October 31, 2011. Prior thereto he had been Chief Commercial Officer, Memorialization since January 3, 2011 when he joined the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Gackenbach served as the Senior Director of Strategy for Kraft Foods’ Cheese and Dairy Division from 2002 to 2010.

Steven F. Nicola was appointed Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer effective December 1, 2003.

Paul F. Rahill was appointed President, Cremation Division in October 2002.

~~Franz J. Schwarz~~ was named President, Graphics Europe in May 2006. He had been Managing Director of S+T Reprotechnik GmbH (“S+T GmbH”) (formerly Matthews International GmbH), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Matthews International Corporation, since 2000. He was a partial owner of S+T GmbH, a provider of printing plates and print services located in Julich, Germany, until September 30, 2005. Matthews owns 100% of S+T GmbH.

Brian D. Walters was appointed Vice President and General Counsel effective February 19, 2009. Mr. Walters joined the Company as Legal Counsel in 2005. ~~Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Walters was a partner with Fried, Walters, Zuschlag & Grochmal, a law firm in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.~~

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Market Information:

The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 70,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, $1 par value. The Company's Class A Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market System under the symbol “MATW”. The following table sets forth the high, low and closing prices as reported by NASDAQ for the periods indicated:

							High		Low		Close
Fiscal 2011:
Quarter ended: September 30, 2011							$	41.08	$	28.57	$	30.73
June 30, 2011								40.49		35.60		40.17
March 31, 2011								38.65		33.56		38.55
December 31, 2010								36.00		31.62		34.98
	High		Low		Close
Fiscal 2010:
Quarter ended: September 30, 2010	$	36.92	$	28.29	$	35.36	$	36.92	$	28.29	$	35.36
June 30, 2010		36.58		28.91		29.28		36.58		28.91		29.28
March 31, 2010		37.00		31.33		35.50		37.00		31.33		35.50
December 31, 2009		39.81		33.23		35.43		39.81		33.23		35.43

Fiscal 2009:
Quarter ended: September 30, 2009	$	36.79	$	28.00	$	35.38
June 30, 2009		32.17		27.11		31.12
March 31, 2009		40.52		27.67		28.81
December 31, 2008		51.05		32.30		36.68

The Company has a stock repurchase program. Under the current authorization, the Company's Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of a total of 2,500,000 shares of Matthews’ common stock under the program, of which ~~850,095~~2,169,470 shares had been repurchased as of September 30, ~~2010.~~2011. In November 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the continuation of its stock repurchase program and increased the total authorization for stock repurchases by an additional 2,500,000 shares. The buy-back program is designed to increase shareholder value, enlarge the Company's holdings of its common stock, and add to earnings per share. Repurchased shares may be retained in treasury, utilized for acquisitions, or reissued to employees or other purchasers, subject to the restrictions of the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation.

All purchases of the Company’s common stock during fiscal ~~2010~~2011 were part of this repurchase program.

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, ~~continued~~(continued)

The following table shows the monthly fiscal ~~2010~~2011 stock repurchase activity:

Period Total number of shares purchased Average price paid per share Total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan

October 2009 - $ - - 220,078
November 2009 65,000 35.50 65,000 155,078
December 2009 81,636 34.73 81,636 73,442
January 2010 6,475 34.05 6,475 2,566,967
February 2010 66,708 32.42 66,708 2,500,259
March 2010 52,056 35.73 52,056 2,448,203
April 2010 45,000 35.66 45,000 2,403,203
May 2010 97,200 33.15 97,200 2,306,003
June 2010 220,225 30.55 220,225 2,085,778
July 2010 114,343 31.60 114,343 1,971,435
August 2010 261,400 33.32 261,400 1,710,035
September 2010 60,130 33.93 60,130 1,649,905
Total 1,070,173 $ 32.99 1,070,173

Period	Total number of shares purchased		Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan		Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan

October 2010		760	$	33.44		760		1,649,145
November 2010		11,735		33.31		11,735		1,637,410
December 2010		69,048		33.69		69,048		1,568,362
January 2011		20,347		34.14		20,347		1,548,015
February 2011		35,000		36.16		35,000		1,513,015
March 2011		75,000		35.96		75,000		1,438,015
April 2011		3,085		39.44		3,085		1,434,930
May 2011		126,113		38.21		126,113		1,308,817
June 2011		53,120		37.71		53,120		1,255,697
July 2011		142,184		36.92		142,184		1,113,513
August 2011		529,271		32.32		529,271		584,242
September 2011		253,712		31.01		253,712		330,530
Total		1,319,375	$	33.78		1,319,375

Holders:

Based on records available to the Company, the number of registered holders of the Company's common stock was 504 at

October 31, ~~2010.~~2011.

Dividends:

A quarterly dividend of ~~$.08~~$.09 per share was paid for the fourth quarter of fiscal ~~2010~~2011 to shareholders of record on ~~November 8,~~October 31, 2011. The Company paid quarterly dividends of $.08 per share for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company paid quarterly dividends of $.07 per share for the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company paid quarterly dividends of $.065 per share for the first three quarters of fiscal 2009 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. ~~The Company paid quarterly dividends of $.06 per share for the first three quarters of fiscal 2008 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.~~

Cash dividends have been paid on common shares in every year for at least the past forty years. It is the present intention of the Company to continue to pay quarterly cash dividends on its common stock. However, there is no assurance that dividends will be declared and paid as the declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company and is dependent upon the Company's financial condition, results of operations, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.

~~ITEM 5.~~

~~MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, continued~~

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, (continued)

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE RETURN *

AMONG MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,

S&P 500 INDEX, S&P MIDCAP 400 INDEX AND S&P SMALLCAP 600 INDEX **

* Total return assumes dividend reinvestment

** Fiscal year ended September 30

Note: Performance graph assumes $100 invested on October 1, ~~2005~~2006 in Matthews International Corporation Common Stock, Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Index, S&P MidCap 400 Index and S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The results are not necessarily indicative of future performance.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

	Years Ended September 30,											Years Ended September 30,
	2010(1)		2009(2)		2008(3)		2007(4)		2006(5)			2011(1)		2010(2)		2009(3)		2008(4)		2007(5)
	(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)											(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
	(Not Covered by Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm)											(Not Covered by Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm)

Net sales	$	821,829	$	780,908	$	818,623	$	749,352		$	715,891	$	898,821	$	821,829	$	780,908	$	818,623		$	749,352

Operating profit		116,581		101,011		132,952		111,824			113,884		118,516		116,581		101,011		132,952			111,824

Interest expense		7,419		12,053		10,405		8,119			6,995		8,241		7,419		12,053		10,405			8,119

Net income attributable to Matthews shareholders		69,057		57,732		79,484		64,726			66,444		72,372		69,057		57,732		79,484			64,726


Earnings per common share:
Basic		$2.32		$1.91		$2.57		$2.05			$2.08		$2.47		$2.32		$1.91		$2.57			$2.05
Diluted		2.31		1.90		2.55		2.04			2.06		2.46		2.31		1.90		2.55			2.04

Weighted-average common
shares outstanding:
Basic		29,656		30,245		30,928		31,566			31,999		28,775		29,656		30,245		30,928			31,566
Diluted		29,898		30,435		31,158		31,680			32,252		28,812		29,706		30,318		31,184			31,680

Cash dividends per share		$.290		$.265		$.245		$.225			$.205		$.330		$.290		$.265		$.245			$.225

Total assets	$	993,825	$	949,653	$	914,282	$	771,069		$	716,090	$	1,097,455	$	993,825	$	949,653	$	914,282		$	771,069
Long-term debt, non-current		225,256		237,530		219,124		142,273			120,289		299,170		225,256		237,530		219,124			142,273

(1)	Fiscal 2011 included the favorable effect of an adjustment of $606 to income tax expense primarily related to changes in estimated tax accruals for open tax periods.

(2)	Fiscal 2010 included the favorable effect of an adjustment of $838 to income tax expense primarily related to changes in estimated tax accruals for open tax periods.

~~(2)~~(3)

Fiscal 2009 included pre-tax unusual charges of approximately $16,500, which primarily consisted of severance and other costs related to the consolidation of certain production operations within the Company’s Bronze segment, costs related to operational and systems improvements in several of the Company’s other businesses, and asset adjustments resulting from current market conditions. In addition, fiscal 2009 earnings included the favorable effect of an adjustment of $1,255 to income tax expense primarily related to the Company’s ability to utilize a European tax loss carryover generated in prior years and changes in the estimated tax accruals for open tax periods.

~~(3)~~(4)

Fiscal 2008 included a reduction in income taxes of $1,882 to reflect the adjustment of net deferred tax liabilities resulting from the enactment of lower statutory income tax rates in certain European countries.

~~(4)~~(5)

Fiscal 2007 included a net pre-tax charge of approximately $8,765 which consisted primarily of special charges related to the acceleration of earn-out payments in the resolution of employment agreements from the Milso Industries acquisition and pre-tax charges related to severance costs incurred in several of the Company’s segments, partially offset by a pre-tax gain on the sale of the marketing consultancy business of the Merchandising Solutions segment and favorable legal settlements, net of related legal costs, in the Casket segment.

~~(5)~~

~~Fiscal 2006 included a net pre-tax gain of $1,016 which consisted of a pre-tax gain from the sale of a facility, partially offset by a pre-tax charge related to asset impairments and related costs.~~

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Matthews International Corporation and related notes thereto. In addition, see "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information" included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

~~RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~:

The following table sets forth certain income statement data of the Company expressed as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated and the percentage change in such income statement data from year to year.

	Years Ended September 30,									Percentage Change					Years Ended September 30,									Percentage Change

	2010			2009			2008				2010-2009		2009-2008		2011			2010			2009				2011-2010		2010-2009
Sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		5.2	%	(4.6	)%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		9.4	%	5.2	%
Gross profit		39.3			37.7			39.5			9.7		(8.7	)		39.1			39.3			37.7			8.7		9.7
Operating profit		14.2			12.9			16.2			15.4		(24.0	)		13.2			14.2			12.9			1.7		15.4
Net income attributable to Matthews shareholders		8.4			7.4			9.7			19.6		(27.4	)		8.1			8.4			7.4			4.8		19.6

Comparison of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010:

Sales for the year ended September 30, 2011 were $898.8 million, compared to $821.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2010. The increase resulted principally from the impact of acquisitions, higher sales volume in the Company’s Brand Solutions businesses and changes in the values of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, which had a favorable impact of approximately $11.4 million on the Company’s consolidated sales compared to fiscal 2010.

In the Memorialization businesses, Bronze segment sales for fiscal 2011 were $224.8 million compared to $224.2 million for fiscal 2010. The increase primarily reflected the December 2009 acquisition of United Memorial Products, Inc. (“UMP”) and the favorable impact of changes in foreign currency values against the U.S. dollar. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency changes, fiscal 2011 Bronze segment sales declined compared to fiscal 2010, reflecting lower sales volume of bronze memorial and architectural products and an unfavorable change in product mix. Sales for the Casket segment were $238.8 million for fiscal 2011 compared to $210.3 million for fiscal 2010. The increase resulted principally from acquisitions. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, fiscal 2011 Casket segment sales declined, principally reflecting slightly lower unit volume and an unfavorable change in product mix. Lower sales (excluding acquisitions) for both the Bronze and Casket segments reflected the impact of a decline in the estimated number of casketed deaths compared to the prior year. Based on available published data, U.S. deaths for the year ended September 30, 2011 were estimated to have increased from fiscal 2010; however, casketed deaths (non-cremation) were estimated to have declined from the prior year. Sales for the Cremation segment were $43.8 million for fiscal 2011 compared to $39.4 million a year ago. The increase principally resulted from higher sales in all of the segment’s principal markets (U.S., U.K. and Europe) and the acquisition of a small manufacturer of cremation equipment in the U.K. in March 2010. In the Company’s Brand Solutions businesses, sales for the Graphics Imaging segment in fiscal 2011 were $269.0 million, compared to $240.0 million a year ago. The increase resulted principally from higher sales in all markets (Europe, U.S., U.K. and Asia), the July 2011 acquisition of Kroma Pre-Press Preparation Systems Industry & Trade, Inc. (“Kroma”) and the favorable impact from changes in the values of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar. Marking Products segment sales for the year ended September 30, 2011 were $61.9 million, compared to $51.1 million for fiscal 2010. The increase was principally due to higher sales of equipment and consumables in the U.S. and China, two small acquisitions in fiscal 2011 and the favorable impact of changes in foreign currency values. Sales for the Merchandising Solutions segment were $60.6 million for fiscal 2011, compared to $56.9 million a year ago. The improvement was attributable to an increase in project volume to several large global customers in fiscal 2011, compared to fiscal 2010.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, (continued)

Gross profit for the year ended September 30, 2011 was $351.7 million, or 39.1% of sales, compared to $323.4 million, or 39.3% of sales, for fiscal 2010. The increase in fiscal 2011 consolidated gross profit compared to fiscal 2010 reflected higher sales in the Brand Solutions businesses and the benefit of cost structure initiatives. The increases were partially offset by higher commodity costs, primarily in the Bronze and Casket segments.

Selling and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 2011 were $233.1 million, or 25.9% of sales, compared to $206.8 million, or 25.2% of sales, for fiscal 2010. The increase primarily resulted from higher sales and the impact of acquisitions.

Operating profit for fiscal 2011 was $118.5 million, compared to $116.6 million for fiscal 2010. The increase in operating profit for fiscal 2011 reflected the impact of acquisitions and a favorable impact of $1.4 million from changes in foreign currency values against the U.S. dollar. These increases were partially offset by higher commodity costs, primarily in the Bronze and Casket segments. Bronze segment operating profit for fiscal 2011 was $52.5 million, compared to $56.2 million for fiscal 2010. The decrease in fiscal 2011 operating profit compared to fiscal 2010 reflected lower sales, including an unfavorable shift in product mix, and a significant increase in bronze metal costs in fiscal 2011. Operating profit for the Casket segment for fiscal 2011 was $26.8 million, compared to $26.2 million for fiscal 2010. The increase in Casket segment operating profit for fiscal 2011 primarily reflected the benefit of acquisitions. Excluding acquisitions, Casket segment operating profit declined, primarily reflecting an unfavorable change in product mix and the impact of higher steel and fuel costs, partially offset by the benefit of recent cost structure initiatives. Cremation segment operating profit for the year ended September 30, 2011 was $5.7 million, compared to $4.9 million a year ago. Fiscal 2011 operating profit reflected higher sales and the impact of the March 2010 acquisition of a small cremation equipment manufacturer in the U.K. Graphics Imaging operating profit for fiscal 2011 was $22.4 million, compared to $21.1 million for 2010. The increase in fiscal 2011 reflected higher sales, improvements in the segment’s U.S. cost structure, the acquisition of Kroma and the favorable impact of changes in foreign currency values, partially offset by higher manufacturing costs in the segment’s European gravure manufacturing operations. Operating profit for the Marking Products segment for fiscal 2011 was $7.8 million, compared to $5.8 million a year ago. The increase in Marking Products segment operating profit principally reflected the impact of acquisitions and higher sales in the U.S. and China. These increases were partially offset by an increase in research and development costs. The Merchandising Solutions segment operating profit was $3.3 million for fiscal 2011, compared to $2.4 million for fiscal 2010. The increase principally reflected the impact of higher sales.

Investment income for the year ended September 30, 2011 was $1.4 million, compared to $2.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2010. The decrease principally reflected a decline in the market value of investments held in trust for certain of the Company’s benefit plans. Interest expense for fiscal 2011 was $8.2 million, compared to $7.4 million last year. The increase in interest expense reflected higher average debt levels resulting primarily from recent acquisitions.

Other income (deductions), net, for the year ended September 30, 2011 represented an increase in pre-tax income of $298,000, compared to a reduction in pre-tax income of $1.3 million in 2010. The favorable impact on other income (deductions), net in fiscal 2011 primarily reflected a foreign currency exchange gain on the settlement of an intercompany loan.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, (continued)

The Company's effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 was 34.4%, compared to 35.0% for fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2011 and 2010 included the favorable impact of adjustments totaling $606,000 and $838,000, respectively, in income tax expense primarily related to changes in the estimated tax accruals for open tax periods. Excluding these adjustments from both periods, the Company’s effective tax rate was 35.0% for fiscal year 2011 and 35.8% for fiscal year 2010. The decrease in the fiscal 2011 effective tax rate, compared to fiscal 2010 primarily reflected the impact of the Company’s European tax structure initiatives. The difference between the Company's effective tax rate and the Federal statutory rate of 35.0% primarily reflected the impact of state taxes, offset by lower foreign income taxes.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest was $1.1 million for fiscal 2011, compared to $2.7 million in fiscal 2010. The decrease related principally to the Company’s acquisition, effective as of the beginning of fiscal 2011, of the remaining 25% interest in one of its less than wholly-owned German graphics businesses and the acquisition of the remaining 22% interest in Saueressig GmbH & Co. KG (“Saueressig”) in April 2011.

Comparison of Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009:

Sales for the year ended September 30, 2010 were $821.8 million, compared to $780.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2009. The increase resulted principally from the impact of acquisitions and higher sales volume in several of the Company’s businesses. For the year ended September 30, 2010, changes in foreign currency values against the U.S. dollar had a favorable impact of approximately $3.9 million on the Company’s consolidated sales compared to fiscal 2009.

In the Memorialization businesses, Bronze segment sales for fiscal 2010 were $224.2 million compared to $215.9 million for fiscal 2009. The increase primarily reflected the acquisition of ~~United Memorial Products, Inc. (“UMP”), a supplier of granite memorial products and caskets in the West region of the United States.~~UMP. The increase was partially offset by a decline in bronze memorial unit volume. Sales for the Casket segment were $210.3 million for fiscal 2010 compared to $203.2 million for fiscal 2009. The increase resulted principally from the acquisition of several casket businesses, partially offset by lower unit volume. The decline in sales (excluding acquisitions) for both the Bronze and Casket segments reflected the impact of a decline in the estimated number of casketed deaths compared to the prior year. Based on available published data, U.S. deaths for the year ended September 30, 2010 were estimated to have declined. Casketed deaths (non-cremation) were also estimated to have declined from fiscal 2009. Sales for the Cremation segment were $39.4 million for fiscal 2010 compared to $30.9 million ~~a year ago.~~in fiscal 2009. The increase principally resulted from the acquisition of a small manufacturer of cremation equipment in the U.K. and higher sales in the U.S. and European markets. In the Company’s Brand Solutions businesses, sales for the Graphics Imaging segment in fiscal 2010 were $240.0 million, compared to $235.0 million ~~a year ago.~~in the prior year. The increase resulted principally from higher sales by Saueressig ~~GmbH & Co. KG (“Saueressig”)~~ and the impact of the acquisition of a small graphics operation headquartered in Hong Kong in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, partially offset by lower sales in the U.S. and U.K. markets. Marking Products segment sales for the year ended September 30, 2010 were $51.1 million, compared to $42.4 million for fiscal 2009. The increase was principally due to higher unit volume and the acquisition of a small European distributor. Sales for the Merchandising Solutions segment were $56.9 million for fiscal 2010, compared to $53.5 million ~~a year ago.~~in fiscal 2009. The increase was attributable to an increase in project volume in the last six months of fiscal 2010.

~~ITEM 7.~~

~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, continued~~

Gross profit for the year ended September 30, 2010 was $323.4 million, compared to $294.8 million for fiscal 2009. Consolidated gross profit as a percent of sales increased to 39.3% for fiscal 2010 from 37.7% for fiscal 2009. Gross profit for fiscal 2009 included unusual charges totaling approximately $9.0 million, consisting of severance and other expenses related to the facility consolidations in the Bronze segment, and costs related to operational and system improvements in several of the Company’s other segments. The increase in fiscal 2010 consolidated gross profit and gross profit percentage compared to fiscal 2009 also reflected the ~~current year~~ benefit of ~~the~~ fiscal 2009 cost structure changes, particularly in the Saueressig operation and the Casket and Marking Products segments.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, (continued)

Selling and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 2010 were $206.8 million, compared to $193.8 million for fiscal 2009. Consolidated selling and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 25.2% for the year ended September 30, 2010, compared to 24.8% ~~last~~in the prior year. The increases in costs and percentage of sales primarily resulted from higher pension expense and the impact of acquisitions. The increase in pension cost primarily reflected unfavorable changes in the values of plan assets and a reduction in the actuarial discount ~~rate as a result of recent market conditions.~~rate. Unusual charges included in selling and administrative expenses totaled $7.5 million for fiscal 2009, and consisted primarily of Saueressig integration costs, increased bad debt expense, termination-related expenses, and costs related to operational and systems improvements. These unusual charges included consulting fees incurred for assistance in the operational and financial integration of Saueressig into Matthews. Bad debt expense, particularly in the Casket segment, was significantly higher in fiscal 2009, reflecting economic conditions. The increase resulted from the deterioration in the aging of outstanding accounts receivable. Employee termination-related and the other costs in connection with operational and systems improvements primarily reflected the Company’s initiatives as a result of the recession. The principal objectives of these initiatives were to better align the cost structures of the Company’s businesses with their respective revenue run rates.

Operating profit for fiscal 2010 was $116.6 million, compared to $101.0 million for fiscal 2009. Operating profit for fiscal 2010 included an increase of approximately $5.2 million in pension cost. Operating profit for fiscal 2009 included unusual charges of approximately $16.5 million. Bronze segment operating profit for fiscal 2010 was $56.2 million, compared to $57.6 million for fiscal 2009. Bronze segment operating profit for fiscal 2009 included unusual charges of approximately $7.2 million, principally relating to facility consolidations. The decrease in fiscal 2010 operating profit compared to fiscal 2009 reflected lower sales volume (excluding the UMP acquisition) and higher pension cost. ~~ 0;~~Operating profit for the Casket segment for fiscal 2010 was $26.2 million, compared to $17.7 million for fiscal 2009. Fiscal 2009 Casket segment operating profit included unusual charges of approximately $2.7 million. Excluding the impact of the unusual charges in fiscal 2009, Casket segment operating profit for fiscal 2010 increased by $5.8 million, reflecting the benefit of cost structure changes initiated in fiscal 2009 and the impact of ~~recent~~ acquisitions. Cremation segment operating profit for the year ended September 30, 2010 was $4.9 million, compared to $5.0 million ~~a year ago.~~in fiscal 2009. Fiscal 2010 operating profit reflected higher sales and the impact of the ~~recent~~March 2010 acquisition of a small cremation equipment manufacturer in the U.K., offset by the impact of an unfavorable change in product mix and higher pension cost. The Graphics Imaging segment operating profit for fiscal 2010 was $21.1 million, compared to $19.2 million for 2009. ~~Operatin g~~Operating profit in fiscal 2009 included unusual charges of approximately $3.1 million. Excluding the effect of the unusual charges, operating profit decreased approximately $1.2 million in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. A decline in operating profit in the U.S. graphics operations offset higher operating profit from Saueressig and the impact of the acquisition of a small graphics business headquartered in Hong Kong. Operating profit for the Marking Products segment for fiscal 2010 was $5.8 million, compared to $1.5 million ~~a year ago.~~in fiscal 2009. Marking Products operating profit for fiscal 2009 included unusual charges of approximately $1.9 million. The increase in year-over-year operating profit, excluding the unusual charges, primarily reflected higher sales and the favorable impact of fiscal 2009 cost structure initiatives. The Merchandising Solutions segment operating profit was $2.4 million for fiscal 2010, compared to an operating loss of $56,000 ~~fo r~~for fiscal 2009. The increase principally reflected the impact of higher sales and fiscal 2009 unusual charges of approximately $1.3 million.

Investment income for the year ended September 30, 2010 was $2.5 million, compared to $2.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2009. The increase reflected higher average levels of invested funds and improved asset performance. Interest expense for fiscal 2010 was $7.4 million, compared to $12.1 million last year. The decrease in interest expense primarily reflected lower interest rates and lower average debt levels.

~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, continued~~

Other income (deductions), net, for the year ended September 30, 2010 represented a reduction in pre-tax income of $1.3 million, compared to a reduction in pre-tax income of $12,000 in 2009. The fiscal 2010 reduction in income primarily reflected foreign currency exchange losses on intercompany loans.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, (continued)

The Company's effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 was 35.0%, compared to 34.4% for fiscal 2009. Fiscal 2010 included the favorable impact of adjustments totaling $838,000 in income tax expense primarily related to changes in the estimated tax accruals for open tax periods. Fiscal 2009 included the favorable impact of adjustments totaling $1.3 million in income tax expense related to the Company’s ability to utilize a tax loss carryover in Europe and changes in the estimated tax accruals for open tax periods. Excluding the one-time adjustments in both periods, the Company’s effective tax rate was 35.8% for fiscal years 2010 and 2009. The difference between the Company's effective tax rate and the Federal statutory rate of 35.0% primarily reflected the impact of state and foreign income taxes.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest was $2.7 million for fiscal 2010, compared to $1.9 million in fiscal 2009. The increase primarily related to the improvement in operating results for Saueressig.

~~Comparison of Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008:~~

Sales for the year ended September 30, 2009 were $780.9 million, compared to $818.6 million for the year ended September 30, 2008. Excluding the effects of acquisitions, sales declined in each of the Company’s segments. The impact of the global recession, an estimated lower domestic casketed death rate compared to the prior year and changes in foreign currency values against the U.S. dollar were the principal factors in the reduction in the Company’s consolidated sales. The declines were partially offset by the acquisition of Saueressig, a manufacturer of gravure printing cylinders, in May 2008 and the acquisition of a small European cremation equipment manufacturer in December 2008. For the year ended September 30, 2009, changes in foreign currency values against the U.S. dollar had an unfa vorable impact of approximately $24.6 million on the Company’s consolidated sales compared to the year ended September 30, 2008.

In the Memorialization businesses, Bronze segment sales for fiscal 2009 were $215.9 million compared to $243.1 million for fiscal 2008. The decrease primarily reflected a decline in unit volume and decreases in the value of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar. Sales for the Casket segment were $203.2 million for fiscal 2009 compared to $219.8 million for fiscal 2008. The decrease mainly resulted from lower unit volume and an unfavorable change in product mix. The decline in sales for both the Bronze and Casket segments reflected the impact of the recession on consumer spending, and a decline in the estimated number of casketed deaths compared to the prior year. Sales for the Cremation segment were $30.9 million for fiscal 2009 compared to $26.7 million for the prior year. 60; The increase principally resulted from the acquisition of a small European cremation equipment manufacturer. In the Company’s Brand Solutions businesses, sales for the Graphics Imaging segment in fiscal 2009 were $235.0 million, compared to $203.7 million in fiscal 2008. The increase resulted from the inclusion of Saueressig for a full year in fiscal 2009, compared to five months in fiscal 2008. Excluding this acquisition, sales were lower in this segment as a result of weak economic conditions and a decrease in the values of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar. Marking Products segment sales for the year ended September 30, 2009 were $42.4 million, compared to $60.0 million for fiscal 2008. The decrease was principally due to lower product demand in the U.S. and foreign markets, reflecting a decline in industrial capital spending and lower sales of consumables. In addition, Marking Products sales were adversely affected by an unfavorable change in the value of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar. Sales for the Merchandising Solutions segment were $53.5 million for fiscal 2009, compared to $65.4 million for the prior year. The decrease was attributable to a decline in volume mainly due to project delays or cancellations by customers, also resulting from the downturn in the U.S. economy.

~~ITEM 7.~~

~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, continued~~

Gross profit for the year ended September 30, 2009 was $294.8 million, compared to $323.0 million for fiscal 2008. Consolidated gross profit as a percent of sales decreased to 37.7% for fiscal 2009 from 39.5% for fiscal 2008. The decrease in consolidated gross profit primarily reflected the impact of lower sales, unfavorable changes in the values of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, and unusual charges. Unusual charges included in cost of goods sold totaled $9.0 million and consisted of severance and other expenses related to the facility consolidations in the Bronze segment, cost structure initiatives in the Sweden operations of the Marking Products segment and costs related to operational and system improvements in several of the Company’s other segments.

Selling and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 2009 were $193.8 million, compared to $190.0 million for fiscal 2008. Consolidated selling and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 24.8% for the year ended September 30, 2009, compared to 23.2% for the prior year. The increases in costs and percentage of sales primarily resulted from the Saueressig acquisition and unusual charges. Unusual charges included in fiscal 2009 selling and administrative expenses totaled approximately $7.5 million, and consisted principally of Saueressig integration costs, bad debt expense, termination-related expenses and costs related to operational and system improvements. Saueressig integration costs included consulting fees incurred for assistance in the operational and financial integratio n into Matthews. Bad debt expense, particularly in the Casket segment, was significantly higher in fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008, reflecting recent economic conditions. The increase resulted from a general deterioration in the aging of outstanding accounts receivable. Employee termination-related expenses and other costs in connection with operational and systems improvements primarily reflected the Company’s initiatives as a result of the recession. The principal objective of these initiatives is to better align the cost structures of the Company’s businesses with their respective revenue run rates.

Operating profit for fiscal 2009 was $101.0 million, compared to $133.0 million for fiscal 2008. Operating profit for fiscal 2009 included unusual charges of approximately $16.5 million. In addition, changes in the values of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar had an unfavorable impact of approximately $3.1 million on consolidated operating profit compared to the prior year. Bronze segment operating profit for fiscal 2009 was $57.6 million, compared to $71.6 million for fiscal 2008. The decrease reflected the impact of lower sales and an unfavorable change in the value of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar. Additionally, Bronze segment operating profit included unusual charges of approximately $7.2 million, principally related to facility consolidations. O perating profit for the Casket segment for fiscal 2009 was $17.7 million, compared to $23.3 million for fiscal 2008. The decrease resulted mainly from lower sales and unusual charges of approximately $2.7 million, which were principally related to bad debt expense, severance and other employment termination-related expenses and cost structure initiatives in the segment’s distribution operations. Cremation segment operating profit for the year ended September 30, 2009 was $5.0 million, compared to $5.5 million for fiscal 2008. The decrease was mainly attributable to the impact of lower domestic sales and unusual charges of approximately $272,000, partially offset by the acquisition of a small European cremation equipment manufacturer. The Graphics Imaging segment operating profit for fiscal 2009 was $19.2 million, compared to $18.6 million for fiscal 2008. The increase principally reflected the Saueressig acquisition, offset by the impact of lower s ales, unfavorable changes in the values of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, and unusual charges of approximately $3.1 million, which consisted principally of severance charges, asset impairments and Saueressig integration costs. Operating profit for the Marking Products segment for fiscal 2009 was $1.5 million, compared to $9.1 million for the prior year. The decrease resulted principally from lower sales, an unfavorable change in the values of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, and unusual charges of approximately $1.9 million, which principally related to severance costs and downsizing initiatives in the segment’s Sweden operation. The Merchandising Solutions segment reported an operating loss of $56,000 for fiscal 2009, compared to operating profit of $4.8 million for fiscal 2008. The decrease principally reflected lower sales and unusual charges of approximately $1.3 million, which principally related to employment termination-related expenses and asset impairments.

Investment income for the year ended September 30, 2009 was $2.0 million, compared to $1.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2008. The increase reflected higher average levels of invested funds. Interest expense for fiscal 2009 was $12.1 million, compared to $10.4 million last year. The increase in interest expense primarily reflected higher average debt levels. The higher debt level resulted from borrowings related to the Saueressig acquisition in May 2008.

~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, continued~~

~~Other income (deductions), net, for the year ended September 30, 2009 represented a reduction in pre-tax income of $12,000, compared to an increase in pre-tax income of $510,000 in fiscal 2008~~.

The Company's effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was 34.4%, compared to 34.5% for fiscal 2008. Fiscal 2009 included the favorable impact of adjustments totaling $1.3 million in income tax expense related to the Company’s ability to utilize a tax loss carryover in Europe and changes in the estimated tax accruals for open tax periods. Fiscal 2008 included the favorable impact of a $1.9 million reduction in net deferred tax liabilities to reflect the enactment of lower statutory income tax rates in certain European countries.

Excluding the one-time adjustments in both periods, the Company’s effective tax rate was 35.8% and 36.0% for fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively. The difference between the Company's effective tax rate and the Federal statutory rate of 35.0% primarily reflected the impact of state and foreign income taxes.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $1.9 million for fiscal 2009, compared to $2.4 million in fiscal 2008. The decrease reflected the Company’s purchase of the remaining interest in one of its less than wholly-owned subsidiaries in September 2008, partially offset by improved profitability at Saueressig.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:

Net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$106.5~~$95.6 million for the year ended September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, compared to ~~$90.9~~$106.5 million and ~~$104.5~~$90.9 million for fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. Operating cash flow for fiscal 2011 primarily reflected net income adjusted for depreciation and ~~2008, respectively.~~amortization, stock-based compensation expense, and an increase in deferred taxes, partially offset by a net increase in working capital items. In addition the Company made a cash contribution of $9.0 million to its principal pension plan. Operating cash flow for fiscal 2010 primarily reflected net income adjusted for depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, and an increase in deferred taxes, partially offset by a cash contribution of $9.0 million to the Company’s principal pension plan. Operating cash flow for fiscal 2009 primarily reflected net income adjusted for depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, and an increase in deferred taxes, partially offset by a cash contribution of $12.0 million to the Company’s principal pension plan. Operating cash flow for fiscal 2008 primarily reflected net in come adjusted for depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, and an increase in deferred taxes, partially offset by cash contributions of $15.2 million to the Company’s principal pension plan.

Cash used in investing activities was ~~$54.3~~$106.8 million for the year ended September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, compared to ~~$32.7~~$54.3 million and ~~$108.7~~$32.7 million for fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. Investing activities for fiscal 2011 primarily reflected payments (net of cash acquired) of $84.4 million for acquisitions and ~~2008, respectively.~~capital expenditures of $22.4 million. Investing activities for fiscal 2010 primarily reflected payments (net of cash acquired) of $32.3 million for acquisitions, capital expenditures of $21.4 million and purchases of investment securities, net of proceeds from dispositions of $690,000. Investing activities for fiscal 2009 primarily reflected payments (net of cash acquired) of $11.0 million for acquisitions, capital expenditures of $19.4 million and purchases of investment securities of $2.6 million. Investing activities for fiscal 2008 primarily reflected payments (net of cash acquired) of $98.1 million for acquisitions (primarily Saueressig), capital expenditures of $12.1 milli on, net proceeds from the sale of investments of $419,000 and proceeds from the sale of assets of $1.0 million.

Capital expenditures were ~~$21.4~~$22.4 million for the year ended September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, compared to ~~$19.4~~$21.4 million and ~~$12.1~~$19.4 million for fiscal ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008,~~2009, respectively. Capital expenditures in each of the last three fiscal years reflected reinvestment in the Company's business segments and were made primarily for the purchase of new manufacturing machinery, equipment and facilities designed to improve product quality, increase manufacturing efficiency, lower production costs and meet regulatory requirements. Capital expenditures for the last three fiscal years were primarily financed through operating cash.

Capital spending for property, plant and equipment has averaged ~~$17.6~~$21.1 million for the last three fiscal years. Capital spending for fiscal ~~2011~~2012 is currently expected to be ~~in the range of $20.0 to $25.0~~approximately $30.0 million. The Company expects to generate sufficient cash from operations to fund all anticipated capital spending projects.

~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, continued~~

Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended September 30, 2011 was $10.4 million, reflecting proceeds, net of repayments, on long-term debt of $68.9 million, purchases of treasury stock of $44.6 million, proceeds from the sale of treasury stock (stock option exercises) of $1.9 million, payment of dividends to the Company’s shareholders of $9.6 million ($0.33 per share) and distributions of $6.2 million to noncontrolling interests. Cash used in financing activities for the year ended September 30, 2010 was $51.5 million, reflecting repayments, net of proceeds, on long-term debt of $8.8 million, purchases of treasury stock of $35.3 million, proceeds from the sale of treasury stock (stock option exercises) of $1.5 million, payment of dividends to the Company’s shareholders of $8.7 million ($0.29 per share) and distributions of $234,000 to noncontrolling interests. Cash used in financing activities for the year ended September 30, 2009 was $53.6 million, reflecting repayments, net of proceeds, on long-term debt of $15.7 million, purchases of treasury stock of $28.8 million, proceeds from the sale of treasury stock (stock option exercises) of $1.2 million, payment of dividends to the Company’s shareholders of $8.2 million ($0.265 per share) and distributions of $2.3 million to noncontrolling interests. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended September 30, 2008 was $13.1 million, reflecting proceeds, net of repayments, from long-term debt of $43.1 million, proceeds from the sale of treasury stock (stock option exercises) of $19.2 million, a tax benefit of $3.1 million from exercised stock options, purchases of treasury stock of $43.3 million, payment of dividends to the Company’s shareholders of $7.4 million ($0.245 per share) and distributions of $1.6 million to noncontrolling interests.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, (continued)

~~The~~In December 2010, the Company ~~has~~entered into a new domestic Revolving Credit Facility with a syndicate of financial institutions. The maximum amount of borrowings available under the new facility is ~~$225.0~~$300.0 million and ~~the facility’s maturity is September 2012. Borrowings~~borrowings under the facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a factor ranging from ~~.40%~~1.00% to ~~.80%~~1.50% based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The facility’s maturity is December 2015. The new facility replaced the Company’s $225.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. The leverage ratio is defined as net indebtedness divided by EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). The Company is required to pay an annual commitment fee ranging from ~~.15%~~.20% to ~~.25%~~.30% (based on the Company’s leverage ratio) of the unused portion of the facility.

The Revolving Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios. A portion of the facility (not to exceed ~~$20.0~~$25.0 million) is available for the issuance of trade and standby letters of credit. Outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility at September 30, 2011 and 2010 ~~and 2009~~ were ~~$187.0~~$250.0 million and ~~$177.5~~$187.0 million, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings at September 30, 2011 and 2010 was 2.59% and ~~2009 was~~ 2.69% ~~and 2.96%~~, respectively.

The Company has entered into the following interest rate swaps:

Date	Initial Amount	Fixed Interest Rate	Interest Rate Spread at September 30, 2010	Maturity Date
Effective Date					Amount	Fixed Interest Rate	Interest Rate Spread at September 30, 2011	Maturity Date
September 2007	$25 million	4.77%	.60%	September 2012	$25 million	4.77%	1.25%	September 2012
May 2008	$40 million	3.72%	.60%	September 2012	20 million	3.72%	1.25%	September 2012
October 2008	$20 million	3.21%	.60%	October 2010	20 million	3.46%	1.25%	October 2011
October 2008	$20 million	3.46%	.60%	October 2011
May 2011					25 million	1.37%	1.25%	May 2014
October 2011					25 million	1.67%	1.25%	October 2015
November 2011					25 million	2.13%	1.25%	November 2014
March 2012					25 million	2.44%	1.25%	March 2015
September 2012					25 million	3.03%	1.25%	December 2015
November 2012					25 million	1.33%	1.25%	November 2015

The interest rate swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges of the future variable interest payments under the Revolving Credit Facility which are considered probable of occurring. Based on the Company’s assessment, all the critical terms of each of the hedges matched the underlying terms of the hedged debt and related forecasted interest payments, and as such, these hedges were considered highly effective.

The fair value of the interest rate swaps reflected an unrealized loss of ~~$4.4~~$7.2 million ($~~2.7~~4.4 million after tax) at September 30, ~~2010~~2011 that is included in equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Assuming market rates remain constant with the rates at September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, approximately ~~$1.6~~$1.3 million of the ~~$2.7~~$4.4 million loss included in accumulated other comprehensive loss is expected to be recognized in earnings as an adjustment to interest expense over the next twelve months.

The Company, through certain of its German subsidiaries, has a credit facility with a European bank. The maximum amount of borrowings available under this facility is 25.0 million Euros ($~~34.1~~33.5 million). Outstanding borrowings under the credit facility totaled 23.6 million Euros ($31.6 million) and 12.0 million Euros ($16.4 million) ~~and 18.0 million Euros ($26.3 million)~~ at September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the facility at September 30, 2011 and 2010 was 2.38% and ~~2009 was~~ 1.58% ~~and 1.75%~~, respectively. The facility’s maturity is September 2012.

~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, continued~~

The Company has the ability and intent to renew this borrowing upon maturity.

The Company, through its German subsidiary, Saueressig, has several loans with various European banks. Outstanding borrowings on these loans totaled 8.3 million Euros ($11.2 million) and 7.9 million Euros ($10.8 million) ~~and 10.0 million Euros ($14.7 million)~~ at September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings of Saueressig at September 30, 2011 and 2010 was 6.05% and ~~2009 was~~ 6.18% ~~and 5.89%~~, respectively.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, (continued)

The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Matthews International S.p.A., has several loans with various Italian banks. Outstanding borrowings on these loans totaled ~~10.8~~8.7 million Euros ($~~14.7~~11.6 million) and ~~12.2~~12.1 million Euros ($~~18.0~~16.5 million) at September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, respectively. Matthews International S.p.A. also has three lines of credit totaling ~~8.4~~11.4 million Euros ($~~11.4~~15.2 million) with the same Italian banks. Outstanding borrowings on these lines were 493,000 Euros ($661,000) and 2.1 million Euros ($2.8 million) ~~and 2.0 million Euros ($2.9 million)~~ at September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009,~~2010, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding Matthews International S.p.A. borrowings at September 30, 2011 and 2010 was 3.11% and ~~2009 was 3.55% and 3.76%~~3.47%, respectively.

The Company, through its Turkish subsidiary, Kroma (acquired in July 2011), has several loans with various Turkish banks. Outstanding borrowings on these loans totaled 13.3 million Turkish Lira ($7.2 million) at September 30, 2011. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings of Kroma was 9.27% at September 30, 2011.

Consolidated working capital was $208.1 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $187.5 million and $173.1 million at September 30, 2010 ~~compared to $173.1 million~~ and ~~$141.4 million~~2009, respectively. Working capital at September 30, ~~2009~~2011 reflected an increase in accounts receivable and ~~2008, respectively.~~inventory in connection with recent acquisitions. Working capital at September 30, 2010 reflected an increase in accounts receivable and inventory in connection with recent acquisitions. Working capital at September 30, 2009 reflected an increase in cash and investments and a reduction in current maturities of long-term debt. Working capital at September 30, 2008 reflected the impact of the Company’s working capital management initiatives, primarily in the Casket segment, partially offset by the impact of the acquisition of Saueressig. Cash and cash equivalents were $60.3 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $59.7 million and $57.8 million at September 30, 2010 ~~compared to $57.8 million~~ and ~~$50.7 million at September 60;30,~~ 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ respectively. The Company's current ratio was 2.3 at September 30, 2011, 2010 ~~was 2.3, compared to 2.3~~ and ~~1.9 at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.~~

2009.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS:

The Company's operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations impose limitations on the discharge of materials into the environment and require the Company to obtain and operate in compliance with conditions of permits and other government authorizations. As such, the Company has developed environmental, health, and safety policies and procedures that include the proper handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials.

The Company is party to various environmental matters. These include obligations to investigate and mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal of certain materials at various operating and non-operating sites. The Company is currently performing environmental assessments and remediation at these sites, as appropriate. In addition, prior to its acquisition, The York Group, Inc. (“York”) was identified, along with others, by the Environmental Protection Agency as a potentially responsible party for remediation of a landfill site in York, Pennsylvania. At this time, the Company has not been joined in any lawsuit or administrative order related to the site or its clean-up.

At September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, an accrual of approximately ~~$6.8~~$6.2 million had been recorded for environmental remediation (of which ~~$828,000~~$788,000 was classified in other current liabilities), representing management's best estimate of the probable and reasonably estimable costs of the Company's known remediation obligations. The accrual, which reflects previously established reserves assumed with the acquisition of York and additional reserves recorded as a purchase accounting adjustment, does not consider the effects of inflation and anticipated expenditures are not discounted to their present value. Changes in the accrued environmental remediation obligation from the prior fiscal year reflect payments charged against the accrual.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, (continued)

While final resolution of these contingencies could result in costs different than current accruals, management believes the ultimate outcome will not have a significant effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position.

~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, continued~~

ACQUISITIONS:

Fiscal 2011:

Acquisition spending, net of cash acquired, during the year ended September 30, 2011 totaled $84.4 million. The acquisitions were not individually material to the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations, and primarily included the following:

In August 2011, the Company acquired Lightning Pick Technologies, Inc. (“LPT”), a manufacturer that develops, installs and supports paperless order fulfillment solutions. The transaction is intended to expand the Company’s presence and product breadth in the marking products industry.

In July 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Kroma, a leading provider of pre-press services and roto-gravure printing cylinders in Turkey. The acquisition is designed to further extend Matthews' presence as the leading provider of reprographic pre-press products and services to the European packaging and tobacco markets. The Company completed the purchase of a 61.5% interest in July 2011 and the additional 8.5% interest will be purchased in fiscal 2012. In addition, the Company entered into an option agreement related to the remaining 30% interest in Kroma.

In April 2011, the Company completed the purchase of the remaining 22% interest in Saueressig for 19.3 million Euros ($27.4 million), completing the option agreement in connection with the May 2008 acquisition of a 78% interest in Saueressig.

In March 2011, the Company acquired Innovative Picking Technologies, Inc. ("IPTI"), a manufacturer of paperless order fulfillment systems. The transaction is intended to expand the Company's presence and product breadth in the marking products industry.

In October 2010, the Company acquired Freeman Metal Products, Inc. and its affiliated companies (“Freeman”), a manufacturer and distributor of caskets. The purchase price for the acquisition was $22.8 million, plus additional consideration up to $6.0 million contingent on operating performance over the next three years. The transaction is intended to provide synergies in the manufacturing and distribution of caskets and expand the Company’s market presence in the Southeast and South Central regions of the United States.

In October 2010, the Company acquired the remaining 25% interest in Rudolf Reproflex GmbH & Co. KG ("Reproflex"). The Company acquired a 75% interest in Reproflex in 2001.

Fiscal 2010:

Acquisition spending, net of cash acquired, during the year ended September 30, 2010 totaled $32.3 million. The acquisitions ~~were not individually, or in the aggregate, material to the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations, and~~ primarily included the following:

In August 2010, the Company acquired Newmark of Colorado and its affiliated companies (“Newmark”), a distributor of primarily York brand caskets in the West region of the United States. ~~The purchase price was $13.2 million, a significant portion of which was deferred, plus additional consideration of $1.9 million contingent on operating performance over the next three years.~~ The transaction was designed as an asset purchase and was intended to expand the Company’s casket distribution capabilities in the western United States.

In April 2010, the Company acquired Reynoldsville Casket Company (“Reynoldsville”), a manufacturer and distributor of caskets primarily in the Northeast region of the United States. The acquisition was structured as an asset purchase and was intended to expand the Company’s casket distribution capabilities in the northeastern United States. The purchase price for the acquisition was $13.6 million, plus additional consideration up to $3.5 million contingent on operating performance over the next three years. Reynoldsville reported sales of approximately $13.0 million in calendar 2009.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, (continued)

In March 2010, the Company acquired an 80% interest in Furnace Construction Cremators Limited (“FCC”), a manufacturer of cremation equipment located in the United Kingdom. The acquisition was designed to expand the Company’s global presence in the European cremation markets.

In February 2010, the Company acquired ~~A.J.~~A. J. Distribution, Inc. (“("A.J. ~~Distribution”~~Distribution"), a distributor of primarily York brand caskets in the Northwest region of the United States. The transaction was structured as an asset purchase and was intended to expand the ~~Company’s~~Company's casket distribution capabilities in the northwestern United States.

In December 2009, the Company acquired ~~United Memorial Products, Inc. (“UMP”)~~UMP , primarily a supplier of granite memorial products and caskets in the West region of the United States. ~~UMP reported sales of approximately $11.0 million in calendar 2009.~~ The transaction was structured as an asset purchase and was designed to extend Matthews’ presence in the broad granite market. ~~The purchase price for the acquisition was $10.0 million, plus additional consideration of up to $3.5 million payable over five years.~~

Fiscal 2009:

Acquisition spending, net of cash acquired, during the year ended September 30, 2009 totaled $11.0 million. The acquisitions primarily included the following:

In July 2009, the Company acquired an 80% interest in Tact Group Limited, a small graphics business headquartered in Hong Kong. The acquisition was intended to expand the Company’s graphics imaging capabilities in Asia.

In December 2008, the Company acquired an 80% interest in Gem Matthews International s.r.l., a cremation equipment manufacturer in Italy. The acquisition was intended to expand Matthews’ cremation equipment manufacturing capabilities in Europe.

~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, continued~~

~~Fiscal 2008:~~

~~Acquisition spending, net of cash acquired, during the year ended September 30, 2008 totaled $98.1 million, and primarily included the following:~~

In September 2008, the Company acquired the remaining 20% interest in S+T Gesellschaft fur Reprotechnik GmbH (“S+T GmbH”). The Company had acquired a 50% interest in S+T GmbH in 1998 and a 30% interest in 2005.

In May 2008, the Company acquired a 78% interest in Saueressig, a manufacturer of gravure printing cylinders. Saueressig is headquartered in Vreden, Germany and has its principal manufacturing operations in Germany, Poland and the United Kingdom. The transaction was structured as a stock purchase with a purchase price of approximately 58.1 million Euros ($90.8 million). The cash portion of the transaction was funded principally through borrowings under the Company’s existing credit facilities. In addition, the Company entered into an option agreement related to the remaining 22% interest in Saueressig. The acquisition was designed to expand Matthews’ products and services in the global graphics imaging market.

In connection with its May 2008 acquisition of a 78% interest in Saueressig, the Company entered into an option agreement related to the remaining 22% interest in Saueressig. The option agreement contained certain put and call provisions for the purchase of the remaining 22% interest in future years at a price to be determined by a specified formula based on future operating results of Saueressig. During the third fiscal quarter of 2010, the Company reached an agreement to purchase the remaining 22% interest in Saueressig for 17.4 million Euros in October 2011. The Company has included the purchase price of 17.4 million Euros ($23.7 million) as a part of noncontrolling interests in the shareholders’ equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2010.

~~Subsequent Acquisitions:~~

In October 2010, the Company acquired Freeman Metal Products, Inc. and its affiliated companies, a manufacturer and distributor of caskets. The purchase price for the acquisition was $22.8 million, plus additional consideration up to $8.0 million contingent on operating performance over the next three years. The transaction was intended to provide synergies in the manufacturing and distribution of caskets and expand the Company’s market presence in the Southeast and South Central regions of the United States.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION:

Matthews has a three-pronged strategy to attain annual growth in earnings per share. This strategy, which has remained unchanged from prior years, consists of the following: internal growth (which includes organic growth, productivity improvements, new product development and the expansion into new markets with existing products), acquisitions and share repurchases under the Company’s stock repurchase program (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources"). For the past ten fiscal years, the Company has achieved an average annual increase in earnings per share of ~~11.9%~~10.9%.

~~The~~For fiscal 2012, the Company continues to ~~remain cautious~~face several challenges. The uneven pace of the economic recovery will influence the pace of growth for all segments. Recent financial market issues in ~~its growth expectations for fiscal 2011. Although~~Europe could affect several ~~segments have seen signs~~ of ~~economic improvement,~~the countries in which the Company ~~expects ongoing challenges from global and domestic economic conditions,~~operates, which may ~~affect the consistency of results~~also have an unfavorable impact on ~~a quarterly basis.~~currency exchange rates. In addition, the Memorialization businesses ~~the decline~~continue to operate in ~~U.S. casketed deaths~~a climate of relatively flat death rates, competitive pressures on pricing and ~~in-ground burials,~~product mix, and ~~rising~~volatile commodity costs present continuing challenges. In addition, foreign currency values such as the Euro have been more volatile recently, complicating forecast models for both the Memorialization and Brand Solutions businesses.costs. However, the Company ~~has been encouraged by a~~is continuously working on productivity and cost reduction initiatives to strengthen all of its businesses. In addition, recent ~~trend of stable and improving order rates in the Brand Solutions businesses and the performance of recent acquis itions.~~acquisitions are expected to favorably impact fiscal 2012 results.

On this basis, the Company currently estimates fiscal ~~2011~~2012 earnings per share to grow in the ~~mid-to-high single~~mid-single digit percentage range over fiscal ~~2010~~2011 (excluding unusual ~~charges~~items from both years). Based on current forecasts, earnings for the fiscal ~~2011~~2012 first quarter are expected to be ~~relatively consistent with~~lower than the fiscal ~~2010~~2011 first quarter, with the ~~results~~projected growth for ~~comparable quarters improving as~~the remainder of the fiscal ~~2011 progresses.~~year sufficient to achieve the Company’s objective for the full fiscal year.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, ~~continued~~(continued)

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment based on various assumptions and other factors such as historical experience, economic conditions, and in some cases, actuarial techniques. Actual results may differ from those estimates. A discussion of market risks affecting the Company can be found in Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk," of this Annual Report on ~~For m~~Form 10-K.

The Company's significant accounting policies are included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables the Company to provide useful and reliable financial information about the Company's operating results and financial condition. The following accounting policies involve significant estimates, which were considered critical to the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, ~~2010.~~2011.

Trade Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:

Trade receivables are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. Trade credit is generally extended on a short-term basis; thus trade receivables do not bear interest, although a finance charge may be applied to such receivables that are more than 30 days past due. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on an evaluation of specific customer accounts for which available facts and circumstances indicate collectibility may be uncertain. In addition, the allowance includes a reserve for all customers based on historical collection experience.

Long-Lived Assets:

Property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets are carried at cost. Depreciation on property, plant and equipment is computed primarily on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is determined by evaluating the estimated undiscounted net cash flows of the operations to which the assets relate. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value which is based on a discounted cash flow analysis.

Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to periodic review for impairment. In general, when the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss must be recognized. For purposes of testing for impairment, the Company uses a combination of valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows. Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, unless such lives are considered to be indefinite. A significant decline in cash flows generated from these assets may result in a write-down of the carrying values of the related assets. The Company performed its annual impairment reviews in the second quarters of fiscal 2011, 2010 ~~2009~~ and ~~2008~~2009 and determined that no adjustments to the carrying values of goodwill or other intangibles with ~~ind efinite~~indefinite lives were necessary at those times.

Share-Based Payment:

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, ~~continued~~(continued)

Pension and Postretirement Benefits:

Pension assets and liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis and are affected by the market value of plan assets, estimates of the expected return on plan assets and the discount rate used to determine the present value of benefit obligations. Actual changes in the fair market value of plan assets and differences between the actual return on plan assets, the expected return on plan assets and changes in the selected discount rate will affect the amount of pension cost.

The Company's principal pension plan maintains a substantial portion of its assets in equity securities in accordance with the investment policy established by the Company’s pension board. Based on an analysis of the historical performance of the plan's assets and information provided by its independent investment advisor, the Company set the long-term rate of return assumption for these assets at 8.0% at September 30, ~~2010~~2011 for purposes of determining pension cost and funded status. The Company’s discount rate assumption used in determining the present value of the projected benefit obligation is based upon published indices as of September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and September 30, ~~2009~~2010 for the fiscal year end ~~valuation, and as of its plan year-end (July 31) in fiscal 2008.~~valuation. The discount rate was ~~5.25 %,~~4.75%, 5.25% and 5.50% ~~and 7.00%~~ in fiscal 2011, 2010 ~~2009~~ and ~~2008,~~2009, respectively.

Environmental:

Environmental liabilities are recorded when the Company's obligation is probable and reasonably estimable. Accruals for losses from environmental remediation obligations do not consider the effects of inflation and anticipated expenditures are not discounted to their present value.

Revenue Recognition:

Revenues are generally recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer, which is typically at the time of product shipment. For pre-need sales of memorials and vases, revenue is recognized when the memorial has been manufactured to the customer’s specifications (e.g., name and birth date), title has been transferred to the customer and the memorial and vase are placed in storage for future delivery. A liability has been recorded for the estimated costs of finishing pre-need bronze memorials and vases that have been manufactured and placed in storage prior to July 1, 2003 for future delivery. Beginning July 1, 2003, revenue is deferred by the Company on the portion of pre-need sales attributable to the final finishing and storage of the pre-need merchandise. Deferred revenue for final finishing is recognized at the time the pre-need merchandise is finished and shipped to the customer. Deferred revenue related to storage is recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated average time that pre-need merchandise is held in storage. At September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, the Company held ~~336,172~~333,174 memorials and ~~238,524~~236,460 vases in its storage facilities under the pre-need sales program.

Construction revenues are recognized under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting using the cost-to-cost method.

The Company offers rebates to certain customers participating in volume purchase programs. Rebates are estimated and recorded as a reduction in sales at the time the Company’s products are sold.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, ~~continued~~(continued)

LONG-TERM CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS:

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations at September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flows in future periods.

	Payments due in fiscal year:										Payments due in fiscal year:
									After										After
	Total		2011		2012 to 2013		2014 to 2015		2015		Total		2012		2013 to 2014		2015 to 2016		2016
Contractual Cash Obligations:	(Dollar amounts in thousands)										(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Revolving credit facilities	$	203,361	$	-	$	203,361	$	-	$	-	$	281,593	$	-	$	-	$	281,593	$	-
Notes payable to banks		27,359		6,858		10,705		8,887		909		31,193		15,299		14,588		1,214		92
Short-term borrowings		2,829		2,829		-		-		-		661		661		-		-		-
Capital lease obligations		4,084		2,570		1,514		-		-		3,865		2,165		1,700		-		-
Non-cancelable operating leases		21,284		8,445		9,983		2,856		-		20,110		7,957		8,754		2,935		464
Total contractual cash obligations	$	258,917	$	20,702	$	225,563	$	11,743	$	909	$	337,422	$	26,082	$	25,042	$	285,742	$	556

A significant portion of the loans included in the table above bear interest at variable rates. At September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, the weighted-average interest rate was ~~2.69%~~2.59% on the Company’s domestic Revolving Credit Facility, ~~1.58%~~2.38% on the credit facility through the Company’s wholly-owned German subsidiaries, ~~3.55%~~3.11% on bank loans to the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Matthews International S.p.A., 6.05% on bank loans to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Saueressig, and ~~6.18%~~9.27% on bank loans to its majority-owned subsidiary, ~~Saueressig.~~Kroma.

Benefit payments under the Company’s principal retirement plan are made from plan assets, while benefit payments under the supplemental retirement plan and postretirement benefit plan are funded from the Company’s operating cash. Under IRS regulations, the Company was not required to make any significant contributions to its principal retirement plan in fiscal ~~2010,~~2011, however, in fiscal ~~2010,~~2011, the Company made a contribution of $9.0 million to its principal retirement plan. The Company is not required to make any significant cash contributions to its principal retirement plan in fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The Company estimates that benefit payments to participants under its retirement plans (including its supplemental retirement plan) and postretirement benefit payments will be approximately ~~$5.6~~$6.0 million and $1.1 million, ~~respect ively,~~respectively, in fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The amounts are expected to increase incrementally each year thereafter, to ~~$7.0~~$7.6 million and $1.5 million in ~~2015.~~2016. The Company believes that its current liquidity sources, combined with its operating cash flow and borrowing capacity, will be sufficient to meet its capital needs for the foreseeable future.

In connection with its ~~May 2008~~July 2011 acquisition of a ~~78%~~70% interest in ~~Saueressig,~~Kroma, the Company entered into an option agreement related to the remaining ~~22%~~30% interest in ~~Saueressig.~~Kroma. The option agreement ~~contained certain~~contains put and call provisions for the purchase of the remaining ~~22%~~30% interest in future years at a price to be determined by a ~~specified~~ formula based onupon future operating results of ~~Saueressig. During the third fiscal quarter of 2010, the Company reached an agreement to purchase the remaining 22% interest in Saueressig for 17.4 million Euros in October 2011.~~Kroma. The Company has ~~included~~recorded an estimate of $10.2 million in “Arrangement with noncontrolling interest” on the ~~purchase price of 17.4 million Euros ($23.7 million) as a part of noncontrolling interests in the shareholders’ equity section of the~~September 30, 2011 Consolidated Balance Sheet asrepresenting the current estimate of ~~September 30, 2010.~~the future purchase price. The timing of the exercise of the put and call provisions is not presently determinable.

Unrecognized tax benefits are positions taken, or expected to be taken, on an income tax return that may result in additional payments to tax authorities. If a tax authority agrees with the tax position taken, or expected to be taken, or the applicable statute of limitations expires, then additional payments will not be necessary. As of September 30, ~~2010,~~2011, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits, excluding penalties and interest, of approximately ~~$3.4~~$2.9 million. The timing of potential future payments related to the unrecognized tax benefits is not presently determinable.

INFLATION:

Except for the volatility in the cost of bronze ingot, steel and fuel (see “Results of Operations”), inflation has not had a material impact on the Company over the past three years nor is it anticipated to have a material impact for the foreseeable future.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, ~~continued~~(continued)

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

OnIn September ~~30, 2009, the Company adopted changes issued by~~2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendment to the ~~authoritative hierarchy~~guidance for goodwill and other intangibles. The amendment applies to the goodwill impairment test and permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of ~~generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These changes establish~~a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the ~~FASB Accounting Standards Codification~~TM ~~(“Codification”)~~two-step goodwill impairment test. The more likely than not threshold is defined as ~~the source~~a likelihood of ~~authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the U.S.~~more than 50 percent. The ~~Codification~~amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. This amendment will be adopted by the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2012. Upon adoption, this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The amendment requires that comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where the components of net income and other comprehensive income are presented. This amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of this amendment on its financial statements and the timing of its adoption.

In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to revise the wording used to describe many of the requirements for measuring fair value and disclosing information about fair value measurements. This amendment clarifies the FASB’s intention about the application of fair value. In addition, the amendment changes certain principles or requirements for measuring fair value and disclosure of such measurements. The amendment is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and ~~annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The~~will be adopted by the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2012. Upon adoption, ~~had no~~this amendment is not expected to have a material ~~impact~~effect on the ~~Company’s consolidated result s of operations or~~ financial ~~condition.~~statements.

In December ~~2007,~~2010, the FASB issued ~~new guidance regarding~~an amendment to the disclosure requirements for business combinations. This ~~guidance requires recognition and measurement of the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest~~amendment specifies that if comparative financial statements are presented in connection with a business combination, ~~goodwill acquired or a gain from a bargain purchase. It~~the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendment also expands the disclosure requirement to include the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination. The amendment is effective for ~~fiscal years~~business combinations consummated on or before the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, ~~2008~~2010, and early adoption is topermitted. This amendment will be ~~applied prospectively. The Company adopted the new guidance effective October 1, 2009. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.~~

In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance regarding noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary. It requires that consolidated net income reflect the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest, and also includes additional disclosure requirements. It is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and is to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the guidance is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company adopted the new guidance effective October 1, 2009, as reflected in the Consolidated Balan ce Sheets, the Consolidated Statements of Income and the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity.

In December 2008, the FASB issued changes to employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. These changes require enhanced disclosures regarding assets in defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. It is effective for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2009. The Company adopted the new guidance effective October 1, 2009. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In April 2009, the FASB issued changes to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. It also requires those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. These changes are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and were adopted by the Company ~~as of June 30, 2009. See Notes 3 and 7 to~~for the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.~~

Onfiscal year ended September 30, 2007, the Company adopted the recognition and related disclosure provisions of guidance on employers’ accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans which amended earlier guidance. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted the provision requiring the Company2012. Upon adoption, this amendment is not expected to ~~measure the plan assets and benefit obligations of defined benefit postretirement plans as of the date of its year-end balance sheet. Adoption of this provision did not~~ have a material effect on the ~~Company’s consolidated results of operations or~~ financial ~~condition. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.~~

In May 2009 and as updated in February 2010, the FASB issued new guidance regarding subsequent events. The guidance establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The statement is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company adopted these changes as of June 30, 2009. The adoption had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

statements.

~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, continued~~

In June 2008, the FASB issued guidance regarding instruments granted in share-based payments.�� The guidance requires unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) to be considered participating securities and therefore included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. This guidance is effective for years beginning after December 31, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of this guidance effective October 1, 2009, which did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

The following discussion about the Company's market risk involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The Company has market risk related to changes in interest rates, commodity prices and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not generally use derivative financial instruments in connection with these market risks, except as noted below.

Interest Rates - The Company’s most significant long-term debt instrument is the domestic Revolving Credit Facility, which bears interest at variable rates based on LIBOR.

The Company has entered into the following interest rate swaps:

Date	Initial Amount	Fixed Interest Rate	Interest Rate Spread at September 30, 2010	Maturity Date
Effective Date					Amount	Fixed Interest Rate	Interest Rate Spread at September 30, 2011	Maturity Date
September 2007	$25 million	4.77%	.60%	September 2012	$25 million	4.77%	1.25%	September 2012
May 2008	$40 million	3.72%	.60%	September 2012	20 million	3.72%	1.25%	September 2012
October 2008	$20 million	3.21%	.60%	October 2010	20 million	3.46%	1.25%	October 2011
October 2008	$20 million	3.46%	.60%	October 2011
May 2011					25 million	1.37%	1.25%	May 2014
October 2011					25 million	1.67%	1.25%	October 2015
November 2011					25 million	2.13%	1.25%	November 2014
March 2012					25 million	2.44%	1.25%	March 2015
September 2012					25 million	3.03%	1.25%	December 2015
November 2012					25 million	1.33%	1.25%	November 2015

The fair value of the interest rate swaps reflected an unrealized loss of ~~$4.4~~$7.2 million ($~~2.7~~4.4 million after tax) at September 30, ~~2010~~2011 that is included in equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss. A decrease of 10% in market interest rates (e.g. a decrease from 5.0% to 4.5%) would result in an increase of approximately ~~$474,000~~$789,000 in the fair value liability of the interest rate swaps.

Commodity Price Risks - In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to commodity price fluctuations related to the purchases of certain materials and supplies (such as bronze ingot, steel, fuel and wood) used in its manufacturing operations. The Company obtains competitive prices for materials and supplies when available. In addition, based on competitive market conditions and to the extent that the Company has established pricing terms with customers through contracts or similar arrangements, the Company’s ability to immediately increase the price of its products to offset the increased costs may be limited.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK, ~~continued.~~(continued)

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates - The Company is subject to changes in various foreign currency exchange rates, primarily including the Euro, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Australian Dollar, Swedish Krona, Chinese Yuan, Hong Kong Dollar, ~~and~~ Polish Zloty, Turkish Lira and Vietnamese Dong in the conversion from local currencies to the U.S. dollar of the reported financial position and operating results of its non-U.S. based subsidiaries. An adverse change (strengthening dollar) of 10% in exchange rates would have resulted in a decrease in reported sales of ~~$30.4~~$34.7 million and a decrease in reported operating income of ~~$3.9~~$4.0 million for the year ended September 30, ~~2010.~~2011.

Actuarial Assumptions - The most significant actuarial assumptions affecting pension expense and pension obligations include the valuation of retirement plan assets, the discount rate and the estimated return on plan assets. The estimated return on plan assets is currently based upon projections provided by the Company’s independent investment advisor, considering the investment policy of the plan and the plan’s asset allocation. The fair value of plan assets and discount rate are “point-in-time” measures, and the recent volatility of the debt and equity markets makes estimating future changes in fair value of plan assets and discount rates more challenging. The following table summarizes the impact on the September 30, ~~20 10~~2011 actuarial valuations of changes in the primary assumptions affecting the Company’s retirement plans and supplemental retirement plan.

	Impact of Changes in Actuarial Assumptions																				Impact of Changes in Actuarial Assumptions
	Change in Discount Rate						Change in Expected Return						Change in Market Value of Assets								Change in Discount Rate				Change in Expected Return		Change in Market Value of Assets
		+1	%		-1	%		+1	%		-1	%		+5	%	-5		%			+1%		-1%		+1%	-1%	+5%	-5%
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)																				(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Increase (decrease) in net benefit cost	$	(2,147	)	$	2,698		$	(925	)	$	925		$	(833	)	$	833		$ (2,259)	$ 2,729		$(915)		$915	$ (833)	$ 833

Increase (decrease) in projected benefit obligation		(19,144	)		24,017			-			-			-			-		(20,183)	24,973		-		-	-	-

Increase (decrease) in funded status		19,144			(24,017	)		-			-			4,743			(4,743	)	20,183	(24,973)		-		-	4,711	(4,711)

Description		Pages
		��
Management’s Report to Shareholders		35

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		36

Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010		37-38

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 ~~2009~~ and ~~2008~~2009		39

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 ~~2009~~ and ~~2008~~2009		40

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 ~~2009~~ and ~~2008~~2009		41

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		42-66

Supplementary Financial Information (unaudited)		67

Financial Statement Schedule – Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 ~~2009~~ and ~~2008~~2009		68

ASSETS	2010		2009		2011		2010
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	59,715	$	57,732	$	60,271	$	59,715
Short-term investments		1,395		62		1,391		1,395
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $11,261 and $12,630, respectively		151,038		138,927
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $10,736 and $11,261, respectively						164,738		151,038
Inventories		107,926		94,455		125,567		107,926
Deferred income taxes		1,666		1,816		1,722		1,666
Other current assets		13,915		12,430		16,157		13,915

Total current assets		335,655		305,422		369,846		335,655

Investments		13,642		13,389		15,105		13,642

Property, plant and equipment, net		129,750		138,060		134,504		129,750

Deferred income taxes		30,555		32,563		33,818		30,555

Other assets		21,101		19,999		16,354		21,101

Goodwill		405,180		385,219		465,003		405,180

Other intangible assets, net		57,942		55,001		62,825		57,942

Total assets	$	993,825	$	949,653	$	1,097,455	$	993,825

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	2010			2009			2011			2010
Current liabilities:
Long-term debt, current maturities	$	12,073		$	14,188		$	18,014		$	12,073
Trade accounts payable		36,308			28,604			46,655			36,308
Accrued compensation		39,062			35,592			31,339			39,062
Accrued income taxes		12,984			8,120			10,272			12,984
Other current liabilities		47,686			45,836			55,461			47,686
Total current liabilities		148,113			132,340			161,741			148,113

Long-term debt		225,256			237,530			299,170			225,256

Accrued pension		50,276			53,734			66,714			50,276

Postretirement benefits		23,307			24,599			26,417			23,307

Deferred income taxes		15,950			13,464			17,007			15,950

Environmental reserve		5,961			6,482			5,406			5,961

Other liabilities		31,234			15,489			42,745			31,234
Total liabilities		500,097			483,638			619,200			500,097

Arrangement with noncontrolling interest		-			27,121			10,162			-

Shareholders' equity-Matthews:
Class A common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 70,000,000 shares; 36,333,992 shares issued		36,334			36,334			36,334			36,334
Preferred stock, $100 par value, authorized 10,000 shares, none issued		-			-			-			-
Additional paid-in capital		48,294			47,436			48,554			48,294
Retained earnings		621,923			559,786			681,658			621,923
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(37,136	)		(29,884	)		(58,658	)		(37,136	)
Treasury stock, 6,855,669 and 6,031,674 shares, respectively, at cost		(207,470	)		(179,454	)
Treasury stock, 7,884,190 and 6,855,669 shares, respectively, at cost								(243,246	)		(207,470	)
Total shareholders' equity-Matthews		461,945			434,218			464,642			461,945
Noncontrolling interests		31,783			4,676			3,451			31,783
Total shareholders' equity		493,728			438,894			468,093			493,728

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	993,825		$	949,653		$	1,097,455		$	993,825

	2010			2009			2008			2011			2010			2009
Sales	$	821,829		$	780,908		$	818,623		$	898,821		$	821,829		$	780,908
Cost of sales		(498,442	)		(486,131	)		(495,659	)		(547,161	)		(498,442	)		(486,131	)

Gross profit		323,387			294,777			322,964			351,660			323,387			294,777

Selling expense		(91,215	)		(83,576	)		(82,677	)		(99,251	)		(91,215	)		(83,576	)
Administrative expense		(115,591	)		(110,190	)		(107,335	)		(133,893	)		(115,591	)		(110,190	)

Operating profit		116,581			101,011			132,952			118,516			116,581			101,011

Investment income		2,536			2,048			1,808			1,443			2,536			2,048
Interest expense		(7,419	)		(12,053	)		(10,405	)		(8,241	)		(7,419	)		(12,053	)
Other (deductions) income, net		(1,285	)		(12	)		510
Other income (deductions), net											298			(1,285	)		(12	)

Income before income taxes		110,413			90,994			124,865			112,016			110,413			90,994

Income taxes		(38,639	)		(31,313	)		(43,031	)		(38,556	)		(38,639	)		(31,313	)

Net income		71,774			59,681			81,834			73,460			71,774			59,681

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(2,717	)		(1,949	)		(2,350	)		(1,088	)		(2,717	)		(1,949	)

Net income attributable to Matthews shareholders	$	69,057		$	57,732		$	79,484		$	72,372		$	69,057		$	57,732

Earnings per share attributable to Matthews shareholders:

Basic		$2.32			$1.91			$2.57			$2.47			$2.32			$1.91

Diluted		$2.31			$1.90			$2.55			$2.46			$2.31			$1.90

									Accumulated																				Accumulated
									Other																				Other
			Additional						Comprehensive						Non-								Additional						Comprehensive						Non-
	Common		Paid-in			Retained			Income (Loss)			Treasury			controlling						Common		Paid-in			Retained			Income (Loss)			Treasury			controlling
	Stock		Capital			Earnings			(net of tax)			Stock			interests			Total			Stock		Capital			Earnings			(net of tax)			Stock			interests			Total
Balance, September 30, 2007	$	36,334	$	41,570		$	467,846		$	13,390		$	(132,362	)	$	5,323		$	432,101
Net income		-		-			79,484			-			-			2,350			81,834
Minimum pension liability		-		-			-			(3,049	)		-			-			(3,049	)
Translation adjustment		-		-			-			(12,323	)		-			(2,904	)		(15,227	)
Fair value of derivatives		-		-			-			(997	)		-			-			(997	)
Total comprehensive income																			62,561
Stock-based compensation		-		4,899			-			-			-			-			4,899
Purchase of 981,563 shares treasury stock		-		-			-			-			(46,189	)		-			(46,189	)
Issuance of 649,654 shares treasury stock		-		781			-			-			20,771			-			21,552
Dividends, $.245 per share		-		-			(7,437	)		-			-			-			(7,437	)
Acquired noncontrolling interest		-		-			-			-			-			1,760			1,760
Distribution to noncontrolling interests		-		-			-			-			-			(1,566	)		(1,566	)
Arrangement-noncontrolling interest		-		-			(28,763	)		-			-			-			(28,763	)
Balance, September 30, 2008		36,334		47,250			511,130			(2,979	)		(157,780	)		4,963			438,918		$	36,334	$	47,250		$	511,130		$	(2,979	)	$	(157,780	)	$	4,963		$	438,918
Net income		-		-			57,732			-			-			1,949			59,681			-		-			57,732			-			-			1,949			59,681
Minimum pension liability		-		-			(702	)		(28,430	)		-			-			(29,132	)		-		-			(702	)		(28,430	)		-			-			(29,132	)
Translation adjustment		-		-			-			4,189			-			55			4,244			-		-			-			4,189			-			55			4,244
Fair value of derivatives		-		-			-			(2,664	)		-			-			(2,664	)		-		-			-			(2,664	)		-			-			(2,664	)
Total comprehensive income																			32,129																				32,129
Stock-based compensation		-		5,822			-			-			-			-			5,822			-		5,822			-			-			-			-			5,822
Purchase of 796,916 shares treasury stock		-		-			-			-			(28,813	)		-			(28,813	)		-		-			-			-			(28,813	)		-			(28,813	)
Issuance of 241,016 shares treasury stock		-		(5,636	)		-			-			7,139			-			1,503			-		(5,636	)		-			-			7,139			-			1,503
Dividends, $.265 per share		-		-			(8,199	)		-			-			-			(8,199	)		-		-			(8,199	)		-			-			-			(8,199	)
Distribution to noncontrolling interests		-		-			-			-			-			(2,291	)		(2,291	)		-		-			-			-			-			(2,291	)		(2,291	)
Arrangement-noncontrolling interest		-		-			(175	)		-			-			-			(175	)		-		-			(175	)		-			-			-			(175	)
Balance, September 30, 2009		36,334		47,436			559,786			(29,884	)		(179,454	)		4,676			438,894			36,334		47,436			559,786			(29,884	)		(179,454	)		4,676			438,894
Net income		-		-			69,057			-			-			2,717			71,774			-		-			69,057			-			-			2,717			71,774
Minimum pension liability		-		-			-			3,929			-			-			3,929			-		-			-			3,929			-			-			3,929
Translation adjustment		-		-			-			(11,952	)		-			901			(11,051	)		-		-			-			(11,952	)		-			901			(11,051	)
Fair value of derivatives		-		-			-			771			-			-			771			-		-			-			771			-			-			771
Total comprehensive income																			65,423																				65,423
Stock-based compensation		-		6,567			-			-			-			-			6,567			-		6,567			-			-			-			-			6,567
Purchase of 1,070,173 shares treasury stock		-		-			-			-			(35,305	)		-			(35,305	)		-		-			-			-			(35,305	)		-			(35,305	)
Issuance of 246,178 shares treasury stock		-		(5,709	)		-			-			7,289			-			1,580			-		(5,709	)		-			-			7,289			-			1,580
Dividends, $.29 per share		-		-			(8,688	)		-			-			-			(8,688	)		-		-			(8,688	)		-			-			-			(8,688	)
Distribution to noncontrolling interests		-		-			-			-			-			(234	)		(234	)		-		-			-			-			-			(234	)		(234	)
Arrangement-noncontrolling interest		-		-			1,768			-			-			23,723			25,491			-		-			1,768			-			-			23,723			25,491
Balance, September 30, 2010	$	36,334	$	48,294		$	621,923		$	(37,136	)	$	(207,470	)	$	31,783		$	493,728			36,334		48,294			621,923			(37,136	)		(207,470	)		31,783			493,728
Net income																						-		-			72,372			-			-			1,088			73,460
Minimum pension liability																						-		-			-			(11,255	)		-			-			(11,255	)
Translation adjustment																						-		-			-			(8,607	)		-			523			(8,084	)
Fair value of derivatives																						-		-			-			(1,660	)		-			-			(1,660	)
Total comprehensive income																																							52,461
Stock-based compensation																						-		6,972			-			-			-			-			6,972
Purchase of 1,319,375 shares treasury stock																						-		-			-			-			(44,567	)		-			(44,567	)
Issuance of 290,854 shares treasury stock																						-		(6,712	)		-			-			8,791			-			2,079
Dividends, $.33 per share																						-		-			(9,632	)		-			-			-			(9,632	)
Distribution to noncontrolling interests																						-		-			-			-			-			(6,220	)		(6,220	)
Arrangement-noncontrolling interest																						-		-			(3,005	)		-			-			(23,723	)		(26,728	)
Balance, September 30, 2011																					$	36,334	$	48,554		$	681,658		$	(58,658	)	$	(243,246	)	$	3,451		$	468,093

		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Short term investments		$	1,395		-		-	$	1,395		$	1,391		-		-	$	1,391
Trading securities			11,770		-		-		11,770			13,426		-		-		13,426
Total assets at fair value		$	13,165		-		-	$	13,165		$	14,817		-		-	$	14,817

Liabilities:
Derivatives (1)			-	$	4,445		-	$	4,445			-	$	7,161		-	$	7,161
Total liabilities at fair value			-	$	4,445		-	$	4,445			-	$	7,161		-	$	7,161

(1) Interest rate swaps are valued based on observable market swap rates and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.	(1) Interest rate swaps are valued based on observable market swap rates and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.									(1) Interest rate swaps are valued based on observable market swap rates and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

	2010		2009

Materials and finished goods	$	93,737	$	80,692
Labor and overhead in process		14,189		13,763
	$	107,926	$	94,455

	2011		2010

Raw materials	$	35,692	$	28,266
Work in process		21,461		14,159
Finished goods		68,414		65,501
	$	125,567	$	107,926

Liability Derivatives
Balance Sheet Location:	2010		2009		2011		2010
Current liabilities:
Other current liabilities	$	2,623	$	2,441	$	2,061	$	2,623
Long-term liabilities:
Other accrued liabilities and deferred revenue		1,822		3,267
Other liabilities						5,100		1,822
Total derivatives	$	4,445	$	5,708	$	7,161	$	4,445

	2010		2009
Long term debt, including current maturities:
Carrying value included in the Balance Sheet	$	237,329	$	251,718
Fair Value	$	225,052	$	230,482

	2010			2009
Cumulative foreign currency translation	$	10,440		$	22,392
Fair value of derivatives, net of tax of $1,734 and $2,226, respectively		(2,711	)		(3,482	)
Minimum pension liability, net of tax of $28,454 and $30,965, respectively		(44,865	)		(48,794	)
	$	(37,136	)	$	(29,884	)

				Weighted-			Weighted-
				average			average
				grant-date			grant-date
	Shares			fair value		Shares	fair value
Non-vested at September 30, 2009		271,656		$	37.61
Non-vested at September 30, 2010						437,442	$36.06
Granted		178,009			33.65	199,960	30.79
Vested		(3,460	)		34.58	(92,526)	39.02
Expired or forfeited		(8,763	)		35.54	(3,263)	34.02
Non-vested at September 30, 2010		437,442			36.06
Non-vested at September 30, 2011						541,613	33.62

	Pension						Other Postretirement
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation, beginning	$	138,935		$	108,631		$	25,650		$	21,887
Effect of change to fiscal year-end valuation		-			(6,322	)		-			(953	)
Adjusted balance, beginning of year		138,935			102,309			25,650			20,934
Service cost		4,489			3,366			691			572
Interest cost		7,495			7,496			1,383			1,542
Assumption changes		2,034			33,600			683			4,890
Actuarial gain		(1,677	)		(2,638	)		(3,214	)		(1,507	)
Benefit payments		(5,367	)		(5,198	)		(793	)		(781	)
Benefit obligation, ending		145,909			138,935			24,400			25,650

Change in plan assets:
Fair value, beginning		84,428			90,516			-			-
Effect of change to fiscal year-end valuation		-			(6,057	)		-			-
Adjusted balance, beginning of year		84,428			84,459			-			-
Actual return		6,036			(7,792	)		-			-
Benefit payments		(5,367	)		(5,198	)		(793	)		(781	)
Employer contributions		9,772			12,959			793			781
Fair value, ending		94,869			84,428			-			-

Funded status:		(51,040	)		(54,506	)		(24,400	)		(25,650	)
Unrecognized actuarial loss		68,793			72,996			6,810			8,467
Unrecognized prior service cost		227			251			(2,083	)		(1,414	)
Net amount recognized	$	17,980		$	18,741		$	(19,673	)	$	(18,597	)

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet:
Current liability	$	(765	)	$	(772	)	$	(1,093	)	$	(1,051	)
Noncurrent benefit liability		(50,275	)		(53,734	)		(23,307	)		(24,599	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		69,020			73,247			4,727			7,053
Net amount recognized	$	17,980		$	18,741		$	(19,673	)	$	(18,597	)

Amounts recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive loss:
Net actuarial loss	$	68,793		$	72,996		$	6,810		$	8,467
Prior service cost		227			251			(2,083	)		(1,414	)
Net amount recognized	$	69,020		$	73,247		$	4,727		$	7,053

Contributions	Pension		Other Postretirement


Principal retirement plan	$	9,000	$	-
Supplemental retirement plan		745		-
Other postretirement plan		-		798

	Plan Assets at				Target			Plan Assets at				Target
Asset Category	2010		2009		Allocation			2011		2010		Allocation
Equity securities	$	49,941	$	43,079		50	%	$	50,147	$	49,941		50	%
Fixed income, cash and cash equivalents		32,716	��	29,878		30	%		37,032		32,716		30	%
Other investments		12,212		11,471		20	%		13,375		12,212		20	%
	$	94,869	$	84,428		100	%	$	100,554	$	94,869		100	%

United States - Federal	~~2007~~2008 and forward
United States - State	~~2007~~2008 and forward
Canada	~~2006~~2007 and forward
Europe	~~2002~~2003 and forward
United Kingdom	2009 and forward
Australia	~~2006~~2007 and forward
Asia	~~2004~~2005 and forward

	Memorialization						Brand Solutions
							Graphics		Marking		Merchandising
	Bronze		Casket		Cremation		Imaging		Products		Solutions			Other		Consolidated

Sales to external customers:
2010	$	224,247	$	210,279	$	39,356	$	239,957	$	51,069	$	56,921		$	-	$	821,829
2009		215,934		203,247		30,909		234,966		42,355		53,497			-		780,908
2008		243,063		219,792		26,665		203,703		60,031		65,369			-		818,623

Intersegment sales:
2010		272		218		4,558		1		16		281			-		5,346
2009		192		276		4,182		64		30		34			-		4,778
2008		213		542		3,883		30		32		45			-		4,745

Depreciation and amortization:
2010		2,442		6,623		246		13,234		526		1,850			2,401		27,322
2009		4,136		7,081		251		14,677		614		2,088			1,445		30,292
2008		3,182		7,840		179		9,716		691		2,433			894		24,935

Operating profit:
2010		56,167		26,242		4,910		21,077		5,817		2,368			-		116,581
2009		57,598		17,716		5,036		19,217		1,500		(56	)		-		101,011
2008		71,576		23,339		5,474		18,617		9,137		4,809			-		132,952

Total assets:
2010		194,110		290,123		29,316		319,480		36,740		54,876			69,180		993,825
2009		182,194		253,012		22,541		337,407		39,569		51,492			63,438		949,653
2008		168,050		264,607		11,990		339,308		48,514		56,714			25,099		914,282

Capital expenditures:
2010		6,107		1,117		253		8,058		450		1,028			4,424		21,437
2009		3,017		2,648		138		8,011		251		492			4,853		19,410
2008		1,369		1,672		130		6,158		365		489			1,870		12,053

		United States		Mexico			Canada		Europe		Australia		Asia		Consolidated			United States		Mexico		Canada		Europe		Australia		Asia		Consolidated

Sales to external customers:	Sales to external customers:																Sales to external customers:
2011																		$	559,362	$	-	$	13,086	$	298,773	$	13,437	$	14,163	$	898,821
2010		$	520,083	$	-		$	14,000	$	264,833	$	11,160	$	11,753	$	821,829			520,083		-		14,000		264,833		11,160		11,753		821,829
2009			498,782		-			11,995		251,823		9,647		8,661		780,908			498,782		-		11,995		251,823		9,647		8,661		780,908
2008			562,991		-			14,122		221,378		11,801		8,331		818,623

Long-lived assets:	Long-lived assets:																Long-lived assets:
2011																			380,059		5,726		476		259,860		6,752		9,459		662,332
2010			334,471		6,367			484		235,902		6,957		8,691		592,872			334,471		6,367		484		235,902		6,957		8,691		592,872
2009			303,342		5,685			466		256,271		3,987		8,529		578,280			303,342		5,685		466		256,271		3,987		8,529		578,280
2008			304,614		5,588	��		469		247,310		2,673		4,635		565,289

	Carrying		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization			Net
September 30, 2011:
Trade names	$	24,266	$	-	*	$	24,266
Trade names		2,227		(1,147	)		1,080
Customer relationships		47,876		(13,228	)		34,648
Copyrights/patents/other		9,870		(7,039	)		2,831
	$	84,239	$	(21,414	)	$	62,825

September 30, 2010:
Trade names	$	24,314	$	-	*	$	24,314
Trade names		1,689		(780	)		909
Customer relationships		40,607		(10,674	)		29,933
Copyrights/patents/other		8,984		(6,198	)		2,786
	$	75,594	$	(17,652	)	$	57,942
*Not subject to amortization


	Quarter Ended										Quarter Ended
											December 31		March 31		June 30		September 30		Year Ended September 30
											(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
FISCAL YEAR 2011:

Sales											$	207,344	$	220,151	$	231,511	$	239,815	$	898,821

Gross profit												79,745		88,113		91,944		91,858		351,660

Operating profit												21,966		28,485		35,081		32,984		118,516

Net income attributable to Matthews shareholders												13,214		16,587		21,875		20,696		72,372

Earnings per share												$.45		$.56		$.74		$.71		$2.46
	December 31		March 31		June 30		September 30		Year Ended September 30
	(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
FISCAL YEAR 2010:

Sales	$	192,973	$	200,866	$	213,329	$	214,661	$	821,829	$	192,973	$	200,866	$	213,329	$	214,661	$	821,829

Gross profit		73,390		77,781		84,969		87,247		323,387		73,390		77,781		84,969		87,247		323,387

Operating profit		22,176		27,118		34,514		32,773		116,581		22,176		27,118		34,514		32,773		116,581

Net income attributable to Matthews shareholders		12,996		15,931		20,411		19,719		69,057		12,996		15,931		20,411		19,719		69,057

Earnings per share		$.43		$.53		$.68		$.67		$2.31		$.43		$.53		$.68		$.67		$2.31


FISCAL YEAR 2009:

Sales	$	191,286	$	197,362	$	192,047	$	200,213	$	780,908

Gross profit		67,852		73,117		75,466		78,342		294,777

Operating profit		20,079		23,439		29,810		27,683		101,011

Net income attributable to Matthews shareholders		11,289		12,742		18,068		15,633		57,732

Earnings per share		$.37		$.42		$.60		$.52		$1.90

			Additions											Additions
	Balance at				Charged to							Balance at				Charged to
	beginning of		Charged to		other					Balance at		beginning of		Charged to		other					Balance at
Description	period		expense		Accounts(1)		Deductions(2)			end of period		period		expense		Accounts(1)		Deductions(2)			end of period
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)											(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
Fiscal Year Ended:
September 30, 2011												$	11,261	$	533	$	580	$	(1,638	)	$	10,736
September 30, 2010	$	12,630	$	1,602	$	737	$	(3,708	)	$	11,261		12,630		1,602		737		(3,708	)		11,261
September 30, 2009		11,538		4,320		-		(3,228	)		12,630		11,538		4,320		-		(3,228	)		12,630
September 30, 2008		11,160		1,712		885		(2,219	)		11,538

	Equity Compensation Plan Information							Equity Compensation Plan Information
					Number of securities							Number of securities
					remaining available							remaining available
					for future issuance							for future issuance
	Number of securities		Weighted-average		under equity			Number of securities		Weighted-average		under equity
	to be issued upon		exercise price		compensation plans			to be issued upon		exercise price		compensation plans
	exercise of		of outstanding		(excluding			exercise of		of outstanding		(excluding
	outstanding options,		options, warrants		securities reflected			outstanding options,		options, warrants		securities reflected
Plan category	warrants and rights		and rights		in column (a))			warrants and rights		and rights		in column (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)			(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders:
1992 Stock Incentive Plan		953,326	$	36.32		-	(1)		872,514	$	37.02		-	(1)
2007 Equity Incentive Plan		-		-		1,521,992	(2)		-		-		1,122,072	(2)
Employee Stock Purchase Plan		-		-		1,671,135	(3)		-		-		1,650,587	(3)
Director Fee Plan		42,813		35.13		140,762	(4)		26,594		35.39		125,688	(4)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	None		None		None			None		None		None
Total		996,139	$	36.30		3,333,889			899,108	$	37.00		2,898,347

		MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
		(Registrant)


	By	/s/Joseph C. Bartolacci
		Joseph C. Bartolacci
		President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Joseph C. Bartolacci		/s/ Steven F. Nicola
Joseph C. Bartolacci		Steven F. Nicola
President and Chief Executive Officer		Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)		and Treasurer (Principal Financial
		and Accounting Officer)



/s/ John D. Turner		/s/ Robert G. Neubert
John D. Turner, Chairman of the Board		Robert G. Neubert, Director



/s/ Gregory S. Babe		/s/ Morgan K. O’Brien
Gregory S. Babe, Director		Morgan K. O’Brien, Director



/s/ Katherine E. Dietze		/s/ John P. O'Leary, Jr.
Katherine E. Dietze, Director		John P. O'Leary, Jr., Director



/s/ Alvaro Garcia-Tunon		/s/ ~~Martin Schlatter~~Jerry R. Whitaker
Alvaro Garcia-Tunon, Director		~~Martin Schlatter,~~Jerry R. Whitaker, Director

Exhibit No.	Description	Prior Filing or Sequential Page Numbers Herein

3.1	Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporation	Exhibit Number 3.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1994

3.2	Restated By-laws By-laws	Exhibit Number 99.1 to Form 8-K dated October 18, 2007

4.1 a	Form of Revised Option Agreement of Repurchase (effective October 1, 1993)*	Exhibit Number 4.5 to Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1993

4.2	Form of Share Certificate for Class A Common Stock Stock	Exhibit Number 4.9 to Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1994

10.1	Revolving Credit Facility Facility	Exhibit Number 10.1 to Form ~~10-K~~8-K ~~for the year ended September 30, 2001~~Dated December 28, 2010

10.2 a	First Amendment to Revolving Credit FacilitySupplemental Retirement Plan (as amended through April 23, 2009)	Exhibit Number ~~10.1~~10.5a to Form ~~10-Q~~10-K for the ~~quarter~~year ended ~~March 31, 2004~~September 30, 2010

10.3	Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Facility *	~~Exhibit Number 10.1 to Form 10-Q~~ ~~for the quarter ended December 31, 2004~~

~~10.4~~	Third Amendment to Revolving Credit Facility*	~~Exhibit Number 10.4 to Form 10-K~~ ~~for the year ended September 30, 2007~~

~~10.5 a~~	~~Supplemental Retirement Plan (as amended through~~ ~~April 23, 2009)~~	~~Filed Herewith~~

~~10.6~~ a	Officers Retirement Restoration Plan (effective April 23, 2009)*	Exhibit Number 10.6 to Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009

~~10.7 a~~10.4a	1992 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended through April 25, 2006)*	Exhibit Number 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006

~~10.8~~10.5 a	Form of Stock Option Agreement*	Exhibit Number 10.7 to Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008

~~Exhibit No.~~	~~Description~~	~~Prior Filing or Sequential Page Numbers Herein~~

~~10.9~~10.6 a	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement*	Exhibit Number 10.8 to Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008

~~10.10~~10.7 a	1994 Director Fee Plan (as amended through November 13, 2008)*	Exhibit Number 10.9 to Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008

~~10.11~~10.8 a	1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan Plan	Exhibit Number 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1995