false--12-31FY20172017-12-310000067716YesLarge Accelerated FilerMDU RESOURCES GROUP INC916028298936061681886023284316134845316127268826010346316127280416187751526054620530181657956052257956123404NoYes141600008760001.001.001.001.00500000000500000000500000000500000000195843297195843297195843297195843297001001001001001001001001001001001001YellowGreenGreenRedGreenGreenYellowGreenRedGreenRedRedYellowGreenGreenRedGreenGreenGreenGreenRedGreenYellowRed2016-06-302016-12-312016-12-312016-02-292016-06-302016-05-312015-04-302015-11-302016-12-312016-12-312016-12-312016-12-312017-06-302017-12-312017-12-312017-02-282017-06-302017-05-312016-04-302016-11-302017-12-312017-12-312017-12-312017-12-312018-07-312017-10-312021-03-312021-03-311050003100030004900000055000836000116200070000770006500023300022600022400011280001425000645000910009800075000100.00500000500000100000010000050000538921538921538921538921
0000067716 us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member us-gaap:UnderfundedPlanMember us-gaap:QualifiedPlanMember us-gaap:OtherPostretirementBenefitPlansDefinedBenefitMemberMultiemployerPlansPostretirementBenefitMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ý
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____________ to ______________
Commission file number 1-03480
MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC.INC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 41-042366030-1133956
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1200 West Century Avenue
P.O. Box 5650
Bismarck, North Dakota 58506-5650
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(701) 530-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per shareMDUNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No ý.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):Act.
Large accelerated filerý
Accelerated filero
Non-accelerated filero  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
 
Emerging growth companyo

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý.
State the aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by nonaffiliatesnon-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2017: $5,116,974,651.28, 2019: $5,134,204,876.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, as of February 15, 2018: 195,304,37613, 2020: 200,389,708 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Relevant portions of the registrant's 20182020 Proxy Statement, to be filed no later than 120 days from December 31, 2017,2019, are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this Report.




Contents
 

Part IPage
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Item 1A
   
Item 1B
   
Item 3
   
Item 4
   
Part II 
   
Item 5
   
Item 6
   
Item 7
   
Item 7A
   

2 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Contents


 
2 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K3



Definitions
 

The following abbreviations and acronyms used in this Form 10-K are defined below:
Abbreviation or Acronym 
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
Andeavor Field Services LLCFormerly QEP Field Services, LLC doing business as Tesoro Logistics Rockies LLC
Army CorpsU.S. Army Corps of Engineers
ASCFASB Accounting Standards Codification
ATBsASUAtmospheric tower bottomsFASB Accounting Standards Update
Audit CommitteeAudit Committee of the board of directors of the Company
BcfBillion cubic feet
Big Stone Station475-MW coal-fired electric generating facility near Big Stone City, South Dakota (22.7 percent ownership)
Brazilian Transmission LinesCompany's former investment in companies owning three electric transmission lines in Brazil
BSSE345-kilovolt transmission line from Ellendale, North Dakota, to Big Stone City, South Dakota (50 percent ownership)
BtuBritish thermal unit
CalumetCalumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
Capital ElectricCapital Electric Construction Company, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Construction Services
CascadeCascade Natural Gas Corporation, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Energy Capital
CentennialCentennial Energy Holdings, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
Centennial CapitalCentennial Holdings Capital LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
Centennial's Consolidated EBITDACentennial's consolidated net income from continuing operations plus the related interest expense, taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization of intangibles and any non-cash charge relating to asset impairment for the preceding 12-month period
Centennial ResourcesCentennial Energy Resources LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
CERCLAComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
Clean Air ActFederal Clean Air Act
Clean Water ActFederal Clean Water Act
CompanyMDU Resources Group, Inc. (formerly known as MDUR Newco), which, as the context requires, refers to the previous MDU Resources Group, Inc. prior to January 1, 2019, and the new holding company of the same name after January 1, 2019
Coyote CreekCoyote Creek Mining Company, LLC, a subsidiary of The North American Coal Corporation
Coyote Station427-MW coal-fired electric generating facility near Beulah, North Dakota (25 percent ownership)
Dakota Prairie RefineryCyROC20,000-barrel-per-day diesel topping plant built by Dakota Prairie Refining in southwestern North DakotaCyber Risk Oversight Committee
Dakota Prairie RefiningDakota Prairie Refining, LLC, a limited liability company previously owned by WBI Energy and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (previously included in the Company's refining segment)
D.C. Circuit CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
dkDecatherm
Dodd-Frank ActDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
EBITDAEarnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization
EINEmployer Identification Number
EPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency
ERISAEmployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ESAEndangered Species Act
Exchange ActSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FidelityFidelity Exploration & Production Company, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings (previously referred to as the Company's exploration and production segment)
FIPFunding improvement plan
GAAPAccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
GHGGreenhouse gas
Great PlainsGreat Plains Natural Gas Co., a public utility division of the Company prior to the closing of the Holding Company Reorganization and a public utility division of Montana-Dakota as of January 1, 2019
GVTCGeneration Verification Test Capacity
IBEWInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
ICWUInternational Chemical Workers Union
IFRSInternational Financial Reporting Standards

 
4 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K3



Definitions
 

Holding Company ReorganizationThe internal holding company reorganization completed on January 1, 2019, pursuant to the agreement and plan of merger, dated as of December 31, 2018, by and among Montana-Dakota, the Company and MDUR Newco Sub, which resulted in the Company becoming a holding company and owning all of the outstanding capital stock of Montana-Dakota.
IBEWInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
ICWUInternational Chemical Workers Union
IntermountainIntermountain Gas Company, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Energy Capital
IPUCIdaho Public Utilities Commission
Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Knife RiverKnife River Corporation, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
Knife River - NorthwestKnife River Corporation - Northwest, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Knife River
K-PlanCompany's 401(k) Retirement Plan
kWKilowatts
kWhKilowatt-hour
LIBORLondon Inter-bank Offered Rate
LWGLower Willamette Group
MD&AManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
MdkThousand dk
MDU Construction ServicesMDU Construction Services Group, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
MDU Energy CapitalMDU Energy Capital, LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
MDUR NewcoMDUR Newco, Inc., a public holding company created by implementing the Holding Company Reorganization, now known as the Company
MDUR Newco SubMDUR Newco Sub, Inc., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of MDUR Newco, which was merged with and into Montana–Dakota in the Holding Company Reorganization
MEPPMultiemployer pension plan
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MMBtuMillion Btu
MMcfMillion cubic feet
MMdkMillion dk
MNPUCMinnesota Public Utilities Commission
Montana-DakotaMontana-Dakota Utilities Co. (formerly known as MDU Resources Group, Inc.), a public utility division of the Company
Montana DEQMontana Department prior to the closing of Environmental Qualitythe Holding Company Reorganization and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Energy Capital as of January 1, 2019
MPPAAMultiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980
MTPSCMontana Public Service Commission
MWMegawatt
NDPSCNorth Dakota Public Service Commission
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NGLNatural gas liquids
Non-GAAPNot in accordance with GAAP
OilIncludes crude oil and condensate
OPUCOregon Public Utility Commission
Oregon DEQOregon State Department of Environmental Quality
PCBsPolychlorinated biphenyls
PronghornNatural gas processing plant located near Belfield, North Dakota (WBI Energy Midstream's 50 percent ownership interests were sold effective January 1, 2017)
Proxy StatementCompany's 20182020 Proxy Statement to be filed no later than April 29, 2020
PRPPotentially Responsible Party
RCRAResource Conservation and Recovery Act
RODRecord of Decision
RPRehabilitation plan
SDPUCSouth Dakota Public Utilities Commission
SECUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC Defined PricesThe average price of oil and natural gas during the applicable 12-month period, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions
Securities ActSecurities Act of 1933, as amended
Securities Act Industry Guide 7Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations
Sheridan SystemA separate electric system owned by Montana-Dakota
South Dakota DENRSouth Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources
SSIPSystem Safety and Integrity Program
Stock Purchase PlanCompany's Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan which was terminated effective December 5, 2016
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act
TesoroTesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC
Thurston County Superior CourtState of Washington Thurston County Superior Court

 
4 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K5



Definitions
 

Sheridan SystemA separate electric system owned by Montana-Dakota
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act
TesoroTesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC
UAUnited Association of Journeyman and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada
United States Supreme CourtSupreme Court of the United States
VIEVariable interest entity
Washington DOEWashington State Department of Ecology
WBI EnergyWBI Energy, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings
WBI Energy MidstreamWBI Energy Midstream, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings
WBI Energy TransmissionWBI Energy Transmission, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings
WBI HoldingsWBI Holdings, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
WUTCWashington Utilities and Transportation Commission
Wygen III100-MW coal-fired electric generating facility near Gillette, Wyoming (25 percent ownership)
WYPSCWyoming Public Service Commission
ZRCsZonal resource credits - a MW of demand equivalent assigned to generators by MISO for meeting system reliability requirements

 
6 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K5



Part I
 


Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical fact, including without limitation those statements that are identified by the words "anticipates," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts" and similar expressions, and include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions (many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions) and other statements that are other than statements of historical facts. From time to time, the Company may publish or otherwise make available forward-looking statements of this nature, including statements contained within Item 7 - MD&A - Business Segment Financial and Operating Data.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed. The Company's expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and are believed by the Company to have a reasonable basis, including without limitation, management's examination of historical operating trends, data contained in the Company's records and other data available from third parties. Nonetheless, the Company's expectations, beliefs or projections may not be achieved or accomplished.
Any forward-looking statement contained in this document speaks only as of the date on which the statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all of the factors, nor can it assess the effect of each factor on the Company's business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. All forward-looking statements, whether written or oral and whether made by or on behalf of the Company, are expressly qualified by the risk factors and cautionary statements in this Form 10-K, including statements contained within Item 1A - Risk Factors.
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties
General
The Company is a regulated energy delivery and construction materials and services business, whichbusiness. Montana-Dakota was incorporated under the state laws of the state of Delaware in 1924. The Company was incorporated under the state laws of Delaware in 2018. Its principal executive offices are located at 1200 West Century Avenue, P.O. Box 5650, Bismarck, North Dakota 58506-5650, telephone (701) 530-1000.
On January 2, 2019, the Company announced the completion of the Holding Company Reorganization, which resulted in Montana-Dakota becoming a subsidiary of the Company. The merger was conducted pursuant to Section 251(g) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which provides for the formation of a holding company without a vote of the stockholders of the constituent corporation. Immediately after consummation of the Holding Company Reorganization, the Company had, on a consolidated basis, the same assets, businesses and operations as Montana-Dakota had immediately prior to the consummation of the Holding Company Reorganization. As a result of the Holding Company Reorganization, the Company became the successor issuer to Montana-Dakota pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) of the Exchange Act, and as a result, the Company's common stock was deemed registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act.
The Company operates with a two-platform business model. Its regulated energy delivery platform and its construction materials and services platform are each comprised of different operating segments. Some of these segments experience seasonality related to the industries in which they operate. The two-platform approach helps balance this seasonality and the risk associated with each type of industry. Through its regulated energy delivery platform, the Company provides electric and natural gas services to customers, generates, transmits and distributes electricity, and provides natural gas transportation, storage and gathering services. These businesses are regulated by state public service commissions and/or the FERC. The construction materials and services platform provides construction services to a variety of industries, including commercial, industrial and governmental, and provides construction materials through aggregate mining and marketing of related products, such as ready-mixready-mixed concrete and asphalt.
The Company is organized into five reportable business segments. These business segments include: electric, natural gas distribution, pipeline and midstream, construction materials and contracting, and construction services. The Company's reportablebusiness segments are determined based on the Company's method of internal reporting, which generally segregates the strategic business units due to differences in products, services and regulation. The internal reporting of these segments is defined based on the reporting and review process used by the Company's chief executive officer.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 7



Part I

The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, MDU Energy Capital, owns Montana-Dakota, Great Plains, Cascade and Intermountain compriseIntermountain. The electric segment is comprised of Montana-Dakota while the natural gas distribution segment.segment is comprised of Montana-Dakota, also comprises the electric segment.Cascade and Intermountain.
The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Centennial, owns WBI Holdings, Knife River, MDU Construction Services, Centennial Resources and Centennial Capital. WBI Holdings is the pipeline and midstream segment, Knife River is the construction materials and contracting segment, MDU Construction Services is the construction services segment, and Centennial Resources and Centennial Capital are both reflected in the Other category.
On November 21, 2017,The financial results and data applicable to each of the Company's business segments, as well as their financing requirements, are set forth in Item 7 - MD&A and Item 8 - Note 16 and Supplementary Financial Information.
The Company's material properties, which are of varying ages and are of different construction types, are generally in good condition, are well maintained and are generally suitable and adequate for the purposes for which they are used.
The Company announced thatseeks to align the interest of its board of directors has directed seniorand management to explore reorganization towith that of its shareholders. The Company believes that an independent, well-diversified board of directors makes it a holding company structure.better corporate citizen. The purposeCompany's board includes individuals of a potential reorganization would be to make Montana-Dakotaethnic, gender and Great Plains, which today are

6 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

divisionsskill diversity. The Company also believes that its separation of the Company, into a subsidiarychairman and chief executive officer further enhances accountability and social responsibility. The Company's management and its board of the holding company, just as the Company’s other operating companies are wholly owned subsidiaries.
For more information ondirectors also have significant ownership in the Company's business segmentscommon stock, which further aligns their interests with those of other shareholders.
Employees The Company hires its employees from a number of sources, including within its various industries, trade schools, colleges and discontinued operations, see Item 8 - Notes 2universities. The primary sources for its employees include promotion from within, team member referrals, union workforce, direct recruiting and 13.various forms of advertising, including social media. The Company attracts and retains employees by offering competitive salaries, technical training opportunities, employee incentive programs and a comprehensive benefits package. The Company believes its focus on training and career development helps it to attract and retain employees. The Company's employees participate in ongoing educational programs to enhance their technical and management skills through classroom and field training. The Company provides opportunities for promotion and mobility within the organization, which also helps to retain employees.
As of December 31, 20172019, the Company had 10,14013,359 employees with 205244 employed at MDU Resources Group, Inc., 9631,578 at Montana-Dakota, 35 at Great Plains, 348 at Cascade, 240 at Intermountain, 319MDU Energy Capital, 335 at WBI Holdings, 3,4664,255 at Knife River and 4,5646,947 at MDU Construction Services. The number of employees at certain Company operations fluctuates during the year depending upon the number and size of construction projects. The Company considers its relations with employees to be satisfactory.
The following information regarding theCompany has a number of employees represented by labor contracts is as of December 31, 2017.
At Montana-Dakota and WBI Energy Transmission, 353 and 68 employees, respectively, are represented by the IBEW. Labor contracts with such employees are in effect through April 30, 2018, and March 31, 2018, respectively.
At Cascade, 192 employees are represented by the ICWU. The labor contract with the field operations group is effective through March 31, 2018.
At Intermountain, 127 employees are represented by the UA. Labor contracts with such employees are in effect through September 30, 2019.
Knife River operates under 43 labor contracts that represent 685 of its construction materials and contracting employees. Knife River is in negotiations on one of its labor contracts.
MDU Construction Services has 130 labor contracts representing the majority of its employees. MDU Construction Services is in negotiations on 10 of its labor contracts.
The majority of the labor contracts contain provisions that prohibit work stoppages or strikes and provide for binding arbitration dispute resolution in the event of an extended disagreement. The following information is as of December 31, 2019.
At Montana-Dakota and WBI Energy Transmission, 333 and 71 employees, respectively, are represented by the IBEW. Labor contracts with such employees are in effect through April 30, 2021, and March 31, 2022, respectively.
At Cascade, 192 employees are represented by the ICWU. The Company's principal properties, whichlabor contract with the field operations group is effective through March 31, 2021.
At Intermountain, 127 employees are represented by the UA. Labor contracts with such employees are in effect through March 31, 2023.
Knife River operates under 42 labor contracts that represent 681 of varying agesits construction materials and arecontracting employees. Knife River is in negotiations on six of different construction types, are generallyits labor contracts.
MDU Construction Services has 107 labor contracts representing the majority of its employees. MDU Construction Services is in good condition, are well maintained and are generally suitable and adequate for the purposes for which they are used.negotiations on four of its labor contracts.
The financial results and data applicable to each of the Company's business segments, as well as their financing requirements, are set forth in Item 7 - MD&A and Item 8 - Note 13 and Supplementary Financial Information.
Environmental Matters The operations of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations providing for air, water and solid waste pollution control; state facility-siting regulations; zoning and planning regulations of certain state and local authorities; federal health and safety regulationsregulations; and state hazard communication standards. The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with these regulations, except as to what may be ultimately determined with regard to items discussed in Environmental matters in Item 8 - Note 17.20. There are no pending CERCLA actions for any of the Company's properties, other thanmaterial properties. However, the Company is involved in certain claims relating to the Portland, Oregon, Harbor Superfund Site and the Bremerton Gasworks Superfund Site. For more information on the Company's environmental matters, see Item 8 - Note 20.

8 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

The Company produces GHG emissions primarily from its fossil fuel electric generating facilities, as well as from natural gas pipeline and storage systems, and operations of equipment and fleet vehicles. GHG emissions also result from customer use of natural gas for heating and other uses. As interest in reductions in GHG emissions has grown, the Company has developed renewable generation with lower or no GHG emissions. Governmental legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding environmental and energy policy are continuously evolving and could negatively impact the Company's operations and financial results. Until legislation and regulation are finalized, the impact of these measures cannot be accurately predicted. The Company will continue to monitor legislative and regulatory activity related to environmental and energy policy initiatives. Disclosure regarding specific environmental matters applicable to each of the Company's businesses is set forth under each business description later. In addition, for a discussion of the Company's risks related to environmental laws and regulations, see Item 1A - Risk Factors.
Technology The Company uses technology in substantially all aspects of its business operations and requires uninterrupted operation of information technology systems and network infrastructure. These systems may be vulnerable to failures or unauthorized access. The Company has policies, procedures and processes in place designed to strengthen and protect these systems, which includes the Company’s enterprise information technology and operation technology groups continually evaluating new tools and techniques that can be implemented to reduce the risk of a cyber breach.
The Company created CyROC to oversee the Company’s approach to cybersecurity. CyROC is responsible for supplying management at all levels and the Audit Committee with analyses, appraisals, recommendations and pertinent information concerning cyber defense of the Company’s electronic information and information technology systems. CyROC provides a quarterly cybersecurity report to the Audit Committee. For a discussion of the Company's risks related to cybersecurity, see Item 1A - Risk Factors.
Available Information This annual report on Form 10-K, the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through the Company's Web site as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company has electronically filed such reports with, or furnished such reports to, the SEC. The Company's Web site address is www.mdu.com. The information available on the Company's Web site is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 7 The SEC also maintains a website where the Company's filings can be obtained free of charge at www.SEC.gov.



Part I

Electric
General The Company's electric segment is operated through its wholly owned subsidiary, MDU Energy Capital, which consists of operations from Montana-Dakota. Montana-Dakota provides electric service at retail, serving 142,901143,346 residential, commercial, industrial and municipal customers in 178185 communities and adjacent rural areas in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming as of December 31, 2017.2019. For more information on the retail customer classes served, see the table below. The principalmaterial properties owned by Montana-Dakota for use in its electric operations include interests in 16 electric generating units at 11 facilities and threetwo small portable diesel generators, as further described under System Supply, System Demand and Competition, approximately 3,2003,300 and 4,9004,800 miles of transmission and distribution lines, respectively, and 7379 transmission and 296297 distribution substations. Montana-Dakota has obtained and holds, or is in the process of renewing, valid and existing franchises authorizing it to conduct its electric operations in all of the municipalities it serves where such franchises are required. Montana-Dakota intends to protect its service area and seek renewal of all expiring franchises. At December 31, 2017,2019, Montana-Dakota's net electric plant investment was $1.4$1.6 billion and its rate base was $1.1$1.2 billion.

The retail customers served and respective revenues by class for the electric business were as follows:
201720162015201920182017
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Residential118,379
$121,171
118,483
$117,014
118,413
$107,767
118,563
$125,614
118,426
$126,173
118,379
$121,171
Commercial22,764
140,856
22,693
135,390
22,423
121,463
22,948
142,062
22,756
141,961
22,764
140,856
Industrial242
34,417
244
31,913
240
32,786
234
37,790
236
36,081
242
34,417
Other1,516
8,275
1,528
7,580
1,511
6,791
1,601
7,454
1,604
7,882
1,516
8,275
142,901
$304,719
142,948
$291,897
142,587
$268,807
143,346
$312,920
143,022
$312,097
142,901
$304,719
Other electric revenues, which are largely transmission-related revenues, for Montana-Dakota were $38.1$38.8 million, $30.4$23.0 million and $11.8$38.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 9



Part I

The percentage of electric retail revenues by jurisdiction was as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
North Dakota66%68%65%65%66%66%
Montana20%19%21%22%20%20%
Wyoming9%8%9%8%9%9%
South Dakota5%5%5%5%5%5%
Retail electric rates, service, accounting and certain security issuances are subject to regulation by the MTPSC, NDPSC, SDPUC and WYPSC. The interstate transmission and wholesale electric power operations of Montana-Dakota are also are subject to regulation by the FERC under provisions of the Federal Power Act, as are interconnections with other utilities and power generators, the issuance of certain securities, accounting and other matters.
Through MISO, Montana-Dakota has access to wholesale energy, ancillary services and capacity markets for its interconnected system. MISO is a regional transmission organization responsible for operational control of the transmission systems of its members. MISO provides security center operations, tariff administration and operates day-ahead and real-time energy markets, ancillary services and capacity markets. As a member of MISO, Montana-Dakota's generation is sold into the MISO energy market and its energy needs are purchased from that market.
System Supply, System Demand and Competition Through an interconnected electric system, Montana-Dakota serves markets in portions of western North Dakota, including Bismarck, Mandan, Dickinson, WillistonMontana and Watford City; eastern Montana, including Sidney, GlendiveSouth Dakota. These markets are highly seasonal and Miles City;sales volumes depend largely on the weather. Additionally, the average customer consumption has tended to decline due to increases in energy efficient lighting and northern South Dakota, including Mobridge.appliances being installed. The interconnected system consists of 15 electric generating units at 10 facilities and threetwo small portable diesel generators, which have an aggregate nameplate rating attributable to Montana-Dakota's interest of 704,143750,318 kW and total net ZRCs of 528.2549.0 in 20172019. ZRCs are a MW of demand equivalent measure and are allocated to individual generators to meet planning reserve margin requirements within MISO. For 20172019, Montana-Dakota's total ZRCs, including its firm purchase power contracts, were 553.1.591.3. Montana-Dakota's planning reserve margin requirement within MISO was 530.2537.2 ZRCs for 20172019. The maximum electric peak demand experienced to date attributable to Montana-Dakota's sales to retail customers on the interconnected system was 611,542 kW in August 2015. Montana-Dakota's latest forecast for its interconnected system indicates that its annual peak will continue to occur during the summer and the sales growth rate through 2022 will approximate two percent annually.summer. Montana-Dakota's interconnected system electric generating capability includes five steam-turbine generating units at four facilities using coal for fuel, four combustion

8 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

turbine units at three facilities, three wind electric generating facilities, two reciprocating internal combustion engines at one facility, a heat recovery electric generating facility and threetwo small portable diesel generators.
In June 2016, Montana-Dakota and a partner began construction on a 345-kilovolt transmission linethe BSSE project within the footprint of MISO from Ellendale, North Dakota, to Big Stone City, South Dakota, a distance of about 160 miles, which will facilitate public policy goals and objectives, including delivery of renewable wind energy from North Dakota to eastern markets.MISO. The project has been approved as a MISO multivalue project. All necessary easements have been secured and the project is expected to be completed incommenced on-line operations on February 5, 2019.
In December 2016, Montana-Dakota signed a 25-year agreement to purchase power from the expansion of the Thunder Spirit Wind farm in southwest North Dakota. In November 2017, the NDPSC approved the advance determination of prudence for the purchase of the Thunder Spirit Wind farm expansion. Montana-Dakota expects to soon have a purchase agreement in place and finalize the purchase when the construction is complete in late 2018. With the addition of the expansion, Montana-Dakota's total wind farm generation capacity will be approximately 155 MW and increase Montana-Dakota's electric generation portfolio to approximately 27 percent renewables. The original 107.5-MW wind farm includes 43 turbines; it was purchased by Montana-Dakota in December 2015. The expansion will include 16 turbines. Acquisition costs for the project are estimated to be approximately $85 million.
Additional energy will beis purchased as needed, or in lieu of generation if more economical, from the MISO market. Inmarket, and in 20172019, Montana-Dakota purchased approximately 2623 percent of its net kWh needs for its interconnected system through the MISO market.
Approximately 2426 percent of the electricity delivered to customers from Montana-Dakota's owned generation in 20172019 was from renewable resources. Although Montana-Dakota's generation resource capacity has increased to serve the needs of its customers, the carbon dioxide emission intensity of theits electric generation resource fleet has been reduced by more than 25approximately 31 percent since 2003 and is expected to continue to decline.
Through the Sheridan System, Montana-Dakota serves Sheridan, Wyoming, and neighboring communities. The maximum peak demand experienced to date attributable to Montana-Dakota sales to retail customers on that system was approximately 61,50163,686 kW in July 2012.2018. Montana-Dakota has a power supply contract with Black Hills Power, Inc. to purchase up to 49,000 kW of capacity annually through December 31, 2023. Wygen III also serves a portion of the needs of itsMontana-Dakota's Sheridan-area customers.

 
10 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K9



Part I
 

The following table sets forth details applicable to the Company's electric generating stations:
Generating StationTypeNameplate Rating (kW)
2017 ZRCs
(a) 2017 Net Generation (kWh in thousands)
TypeNameplate Rating (kW)
2019 ZRCs
(a) 2019 Net Generation (kWh in thousands)
Interconnected System:        
North Dakota:        
Coyote (b)Steam103,647
83.4
 652,071
Steam103,647
90.9
 501,394
HeskettSteam86,000
87.1
 454,134
Steam86,000
86.9
 438,726
HeskettCombustion Turbine89,038
59.0
 3,400
Combustion Turbine89,038
65.2
 1,900
Glen UllinHeat Recovery7,500
4.0
 45,548
Heat Recovery7,500
4.8
 42,276
Cedar HillsWind19,500
5.0
 59,385
Wind19,500
4.6
 51,845
Diesel UnitsOil5,475
3.7
 9
Oil3,650
3.8
 4
Thunder SpiritWind107,500
20.6
 428,528
Wind155,500
29.3
 548,180
South Dakota:        
Big Stone (b)Steam94,111
101.8
 469,709
Steam94,111
105.8
 656,783
Montana:        
Lewis & ClarkSteam44,000
50.9
 225,984
Steam44,000
41.4
 261,457
Lewis & ClarkReciprocating Internal Combustion Engine18,700
16.1
 5,453
Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine18,700
17.6
 3,673
GlendiveCombustion Turbine75,522
68.8
 2,333
Combustion Turbine75,522
70.8
 2,702
Miles CityCombustion Turbine23,150
21.5
 406
Combustion Turbine23,150
21.6
 352
Diamond WillowWind30,000
6.3
 93,696
Wind30,000
6.3
 95,224
 704,143
528.2
 2,440,656
 750,318
549.0
 2,604,516
Sheridan System:  
 
  
  
 
  
Wyoming:    
    
Wygen III (b)Steam28,000
N/A
 189,984
Steam28,000
N/A
 188,254
 732,143
528.2
 2,630,640
 778,318
549.0
 2,792,770
(a)Interconnected system only. MISO requires generators to obtain their summer capability through the GVTC. The GVTC is then converted to ZRCs by applying each generator's forced outage factor against its GVTC. Wind generator's ZRCs are calculated based on a wind capacity study performed annually by MISO. ZRCs are used to meet supply obligations within MISO.
(b)Reflects Montana-Dakota's ownership interest.
 
Virtually all of the current fuel requirements of the Heskett and Lewis & Clark stations are met with coal supplied by subsidiaries of Westmoreland Coal Company under contracts that expire in December 2021 and December 2020, respectively. The Heskett and Lewis & Clark coal supply agreements provide for the purchase of coal necessary to supply the coal requirements of these stations at contracted pricing. Montana-Dakota estimates the Heskett and Lewis & Clark coal requirement to be in the range of 425,000 to 460,000 tons and 250,000 to 350,000 tons per contract year, respectively.
The owners of Coyote Station, including Montana-Dakota, have a contract with Coyote Creek for coal supply to the Coyote Station that expires December 2040. Montana-Dakota estimates the Coyote Station coal supply agreement to be approximately 2.52.3 million tons per contract year. For more information, see Item 8 - Note 17.20.
The owners of Big Stone Station, including Montana-Dakota, have a coal supply agreements, whichagreement with Peabody COALSALES, LLC to meet a portionall of the Big Stone Station's fuel requirements for the purchase of 250,000 tons in 2018 and 2019 from Contura Coal Sales, LLC and 550,000 tons in 2018 from Peabody COALSALES, LLC both at contracted pricing. The remainder of2020. Montana-Dakota estimates the Big Stone Station fuel requirements willcoal supply agreement to be secured through separate future contracts.approximately 1.6 million tons for 2020.
Montana-Dakota has a coal supply agreement with Wyodak Resources Development Corp., to supply the coal requirements of Wygen III at contracted pricing through June 1, 2060. Montana-Dakota estimates the maximum annual coal consumption of the facility to be 585,000 tons.
The average cost of coal purchased, including freight, at Montana-Dakota's electric generating stations (including the Big Stone, Coyote and Wygen III stations) was as follows:
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
Average cost of coal per MMBtu$2.07
$1.89
$1.75
$2.15
$2.00
$2.07
Average cost of coal per ton$30.04
$27.45
$25.41
$31.36
$29.08
$30.04

 
10 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K11



Part I
 

Montana-Dakota expects that it has secured adequate capacity available through existing baseload generating stations, renewable generation, turbine peaking stations, demand reduction programs and firm contracts to meet the peak customer demand requirements of its customers through 2024.2020. In February 2019, Montana-Dakota announced that it intends to retire three aging coal-fired electric generating units. The retirements are expected to be completed in early 2021 for Lewis & Clark Station and early 2022 for units 1 and 2 at Heskett Station. Montana-Dakota also announced the intent to construct a new simple-cycle natural gas-fired combustion turbine peaking unit at the existing Heskett Station. Future capacity that is needed to replace contracts, generation retirements and meet system growth requirements is expected to be met by constructing new generation resources or acquiring additional capacity through power purchase contracts or the MISO capacity auction.
Montana-Dakota has major interconnections with its neighboring utilities and considers these interconnections adequate for coordinated planning, emergency assistance, exchange of capacity and energy and power supply reliability.
Montana-Dakota is subject to competition in varying degrees,resulting from customer demands, technological advances and other factors in certain areas, from rural electric cooperatives, on-site generators, co-generators and municipally owned systems. In addition, competition in varying degrees exists between electricity and alternative forms of energy such as natural gas.
Regulatory Matters and Revenues Subject to Refund In North Dakota, Montana, South Dakota and Wyoming, there are various recurring mechanisms with annual true-ups that can impact Montana-Dakota's results of operations, which also reflect monthly increases or decreases in electric fuel and purchased power costs (including demand charges) and. Montana-Dakota is deferring those electric fuel and purchased power costs that are greater or less than amounts presently being recovered through its existing rate schedules. In Montana, aExamples of these recurring mechanisms include: monthly Fuel and Purchased Power Tracking Adjustment mechanism allows Montana-Dakota's results of operations to reflect 90 percent of the increases or decreases in electric fuel and purchased power costs (including demand charges) and Montana-Dakota is deferring 90 percent of costs that are greater or less than amounts presently being recovered through its existing rate schedules. AAdjustments, a fuel adjustment clause contained in South Dakota jurisdictional electric rate schedules allows Montana-Dakota's results of operations to reflect monthly increases or decreases in electric fuel and purchased power costs. In Wyoming, an annual Electric Power Supply Cost Adjustment mechanism allows Montana-Dakota's results of operations to reflect increases or decreases in purchased power costs (including demand charges) related to power supply and Montana-Dakota is deferring costs that are greater or less than amounts presently being recovered through its existing rate schedules.Adjustment. Such orders generally provide that these amounts are recoverable or refundable through rate adjustments which are filed annually. Montana-Dakota's results of operations reflect 95 percent of the increases or decreases from the base purchased power costs and in addition also reflects 85 percent of the increases or decreases from the base coal price, which is also recovered through the Electric Power Supply Cost Adjustment.Adjustment in Wyoming. For more information on regulatory assets and liabilities, see Item 8 - Note 4.7.
For the Thunder Spirit Wind project, Montana-Dakota implemented a renewable resource cost adjustment rider, and all of Montana-Dakota's wind resources pertaining to North Dakota electric operations were placed in this rider upon a final order of the most recent North Dakota electric general rate case. Montana-Dakota also has in place in North Dakota a transmission tracker to recover transmission costs associated with MISO and the Southwest Power Pool, regional transmission systemsorganizations serving Montana-Dakota,parts of Montana-Dakota's system, along with certain of the transmission investments not recovered through retail rates. The tracking mechanism has an annual true-up.
In South Dakota, Montana-Dakota recovers the South Dakota investment in the Thunder Spirit Wind project through an Infrastructure Rider tracking mechanism that is subject to an annual true-up. Montana-Dakota also has in place in South Dakota a transmission tracker to recover transmission costs associated with MISO and the Southwest Power Pool, regional transmission systemsorganizations serving Montana-Dakota,parts of Montana-Dakota's system, along with certain of the transmission investments not recovered through retail rates. TheThis tracking mechanism also has an annual true-up.
In Montana, Montana-Dakota recovers in rates, through a tracking mechanism, the increases associated with its allocated share of Montana state and localproperty-related taxes assessed to electric operations on an after taxafter-tax basis.
For more information on regulatory matters, see Item 8 - Note 16.19.
Environmental Matters Montana-Dakota's electric operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations providing for air, water and solid waste pollution control; state facility-siting regulations; zoning and planning regulations of certain state and local authorities; federal health and safety regulations; and state hazard communication standards. Montana-Dakota believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations.
Montana-Dakota's electric generating facilities have Title V Operating Permits, under the Clean Air Act, issued by the states in which they operate. Each of these permits has a five-year life. Near the expiration of these permits, renewal applications are submitted. Permits continue in force beyond the expiration date, provided the application for renewal is submitted by the required date, usually six months prior to expiration. The Title V Operating Permit renewal application for Big Stone Station was submitted timely to the South Dakota DENR in November 2013, and a final permit was issued in May 2017. An application to modify the Title V Operating Permit for incorporation of two new natural gas-fired engines at Lewis & Clark Station was submitted to the Montana DEQ timely in December 2016, and a final permit was issued in July 2017. The Title V Operating Permit renewal application for Coyote Station was submitted timely to the North Dakota Department of Health in September 2017, with the permit expected to be issued in 2018.issuance date not specified at this time. Wygen III is allowed to operate under the facility's construction permit until the Title V Operating Permit is issued by the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. The Title V Operating Permit application for Wygen III was submitted timely in January 2011, with the permit issuance date not specified at this time. The Title V Operating Permit renewal application for Heskett Station was submitted timely in June 2019 to the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality with the permit expected to be issued in 2018.2020. The Title V Operating Permit renewal application for Lewis & Clark

 
12 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K11



Part I
 

Station was submitted timely in December 2019 to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality with the permit expected to be issued in 2020.
State water discharge permits issued under the requirements of the Clean Water Act are maintained for power production facilities on the Yellowstone and Missouri rivers. These permits also have five-year lives. Montana-Dakota renews these permits as necessary prior to expiration. Other permits held by these facilities may include an initial siting permit, which is typically a one-time, preconstruction permit issued by the state; state permits to dispose of combustion by-products; state authorizations to withdraw water for operations; and Army Corps permits to construct water intake structures. Montana-Dakota's Army Corps permits grant one-time permission to construct and do not require renewal. Other permit terms vary and the permits are renewed as necessary.
Montana-Dakota's electric operations are conditionally exemptvery small-quantity generators of hazardous waste generators and subject only to minimum regulation under the RCRA. Montana-Dakota routinely handles PCBs from its electric operations in accordance with federal requirements. PCB storage areas are registered with the EPA as required.
Montana-Dakota incurred $3.7$5.5 million of environmental capital expenditures in 20172019, mainly for an embankment stabilization project at Lewis & Clark Station and coal ash management projects at Lewis & Clark Station, Big Stone Station and Coyote Station. Environmental capital expenditures are estimated to be $9.6 million, $9.2$700,000, $1.1 million and $1.5$3.3 million in 20182020, 20192021 and 20202022, respectively, for various environmental upgrades and improvements for air emission and water andprojects, including coal ash managementimpoundment closure project at power plants.Lewis & Clark Station. Montana-Dakota's capital and operational expenditures could also be affected by future air emission regulations, including a future regulation that may replace the Clean Power Plan rule published by the EPA in October 2015. The Clean Power Plan requires existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating facilities to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. On February 9, 2016, the United States Supreme Court granted an application for a stay of the Clean Power Plan pending disposition of the applicants' petition for review in the D.C. Circuit Court and disposition of the applicants' petition for a writ of certiorari ifenvironmental requirements, such a writ is sought. The EPA filed a motion with the D.C. Circuit Court on March 28, 2017, requesting the Clean Power Plan's case be held in abeyance. The D.C. Circuit Court granted the EPA’s motion to hold the case in abeyance for 60 days. On August 8, 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court issued an order holding the case in abeyance for an additional 60-day period and directed the EPA to file status reports at 30-day intervals. In parallel, the EPA published a proposal on October 16, 2017, to repeal the Clean Power Plan in its entirety and followed with an advance notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on December 28, 2017, requesting comment on replacing the Clean Power Plan through new rulemaking.as regional haze emissions reductions. For more information, see Item 1A - Risk Factors.
Natural Gas Distribution
General The Company's natural gas distribution segment is operated through its wholly owned subsidiary, MDU Energy Capital, which consists of operations consist offrom Montana-Dakota, Great Plains, Cascade and Intermountain, whichIntermountain. These companies sell natural gas at retail, serving 938,867977,468 residential, commercial and industrial customers in 335337 communities and adjacent rural areas across eight states as of December 31, 20172019, and. They also provide natural gas transportation services to certain customers on the Company's systems. For more information on the retail customer classes served, see the table below. These services are provided through distribution systems aggregating approximately 19,60020,300 miles. The natural gas distribution operations have obtained and hold, or are in the process of renewing, valid and existing franchises authorizing them to conduct their natural gas operations in all of the municipalities they serve where such franchises are required. These operations intend to protect their service areas and seek renewal of all expiring franchises. At December 31, 20172019, the natural gas distribution operations' net natural gas distribution plant investment was $1.5$1.8 billion and its rate base was $975 million.$1.2 billion.
The retail customers served and respective revenues by class for the natural gas distribution operations were as follows:
201720162015201920182017
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
Customers
Served

Revenues
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Residential833,255
$477,699
818,163
$429,828
803,846
$455,301
868,821
$479,673
850,595
$464,697
833,255
$477,699
Commercial104,795
283,899
103,438
253,333
101,688
277,022
107,741
293,201
106,297
279,566
104,795
283,899
Industrial817
24,030
807
23,337
811
26,568
906
26,570
835
24,555
817
24,030
938,867
$785,628
922,408
$706,498
906,345
$758,891
977,468
$799,444
957,727
$768,818
938,867
$785,628
Transportation and other revenues for the natural gas distribution operations were $62.8$65.8 million, $59.6$54.4 million and $58.5$62.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

12 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

The percentage of the natural gas distribution operations' retail sales revenues by jurisdiction was as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
Idaho33%34%32%29%30%33%
Washington26%26%26%28%26%26%
North Dakota13%13%15%15%15%13%
Montana9%8%8%9%9%9%
Oregon8%8%8%8%8%8%
South Dakota6%6%6%6%7%6%
Minnesota3%3%3%3%3%3%
Wyoming2%2%2%2%2%2%

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 13



Part I

The natural gas distribution operations are subject to regulation by the IPUC, MNPUC, MTPSC, NDPSC, OPUC, SDPUC, WUTC and WYPSC regarding retail rates, service, accounting and certain security issuances.
System Supply, System Demand and Competition The natural gas distribution operations serve retail natural gas markets, consisting principally of residential and firm commercial space and water heating users, in portions of Idaho, including Boise, Nampa, Twin Falls, Pocatello and Idaho Falls; western Minnesota, including Fergus Falls, Marshall and Crookston; eastern Montana, including Billings, Glendive and Miles City; North Dakota, including Bismarck, Mandan, Dickinson, Wahpeton, Williston, Watford City, Minot and Jamestown; central and eastern Oregon, including Bend, Pendleton, Ontario and Baker City; western and north-central South Dakota, including Rapid City, Pierre, SpearfishWashington and Mobridge; western, southeastern and south-central Washington, including Bellingham, Bremerton, Longview, Aberdeen, Wenatchee/Moses Lake, Mount Vernon, Tri-Cities, Walla Walla and Yakima; and northern Wyoming, including Sheridan and Lovell.Wyoming. These markets are highly seasonal and sales volumes depend largely on the weather, the effects of which are mitigated in certain jurisdictions by a weather normalization mechanism discussed later in Regulatory Matters. Additionally, the average customer consumption has tended to decline as more efficient appliances and furnaces are installed, and as the Company has implemented conservation programs. In addition to the residential and commercial sales, the utilities transport natural gas for larger commercial and industrial customers who purchase their own supply of natural gas.
Competition in varying degreesresulting from customer demands, technological advances and other factors exists between natural gas and other fuels and forms of energy. The natural gas distribution operations have established various natural gas transportation service rates for their distribution businesses to retain interruptible commercial and industrial loads. These services have enhanced the natural gas distribution operations' competitive posture with alternative fuels, although certain customers have bypassed the distribution systems by directly accessing transmission pipelines within close proximity. These bypasses did not have a material effect on results of operations.
The natural gas distribution operations and various distribution transportation customers obtain their system requirements directly from producers, processors and marketers. The Company's purchased natural gas is supplied by a portfolio of contracts specifying market-based pricing and is transported under transportation agreements with WBI Energy Transmission, Northern Border Pipeline Company, Northwest Pipeline LLC, South Dakota Intrastate Pipeline, TransCanada Corporation, Northern Natural Gas, Gas Transmission Northwest LLC, Northwestern Energy, Viking Gas Transmission Company, Enbridge Westcoast EnergyPipeline, Inc., Ruby Pipeline LLC, Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. and NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. The natural gas distribution operations have contracts for storage services to provide gas supply during the winter heating season and to meet peak day demand with various storage providers, including WBI Energy Transmission, Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, Company,LLC, Northwest Pipeline LLC, Northwest Natural Gas Company and Northern Natural Gas. In addition, certain of the operations have entered into natural gas supply management agreements with various parties. Demand for natural gas, which is a widely traded commodity, has historically been sensitive to seasonal heating and industrial load requirements, as well as changes in market price. The natural gas distribution operations believe that, based on current and projected domestic and regional supplies of natural gas and the pipeline transmission network currently available through their suppliers and pipeline service providers, supplies are adequate to meet their system natural gas requirements for the next decade.
Regulatory Matters The natural gas distribution operations' retail natural gas rate schedules contain clauses permitting adjustments in rates based upon changes in natural gas commodity, transportation and storage costs. Current tariffs allow for recovery or refunds of under- or over-recovered gas costs through rate adjustments which are filed annually.
Montana-Dakota's North Dakota and South Dakota natural gas tariffs contain weather normalization mechanisms applicable to certain firm customers that adjust the distribution delivery charge revenues to reflect weather fluctuations during the November 1 through May 1 billing periods.
In Montana, Montana-Dakota recovers in rates, through a tracking mechanism, the increases associated withits allocated share of Montana state and localproperty-related taxes assessed to natural gas operations on an after taxafter-tax basis.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 13



Part I

In Minnesota and Washington, Great Plains and Cascade recover in rates, through a cost recovery tracking mechanism, qualifying capital investments related to the safety and integrity of its pipeline system.
On December 28, 2015, the OPUC approved an extension of Cascade's decoupling mechanism until January 1, 2020, with an agreement that Cascade would initiate a review of the mechanism by September 30, 2019. Cascade also has an earnings sharing mechanism with respect to its Oregon jurisdictional operations as required by the OPUC. Cascade initiated the required review by September 30, 2019, which resulted in a slight modification to the mechanism. The decoupling mechanism was approved to continue until January 1, 2025, with a review to be initiated by September 30, 2024.
On July 7, 2016, the WUTC approved a full decoupling mechanism where Cascade is allowed recovery of an average revenue per customer regardless of actual consumption. The mechanism also includes an earnings sharing component if Cascade earns beyond its authorized return. The decoupling mechanism will be reviewed following the end of 2019.in 2020.
On December 22, 2016, the MNPUC approved a request by Great Plains to implement a full revenue decoupling mechanism pilot project.project for three years. The decoupling mechanism will reflect the period OctoberJanuary 1 through September 30December 31. Great Plains requested approval to extend the initial pilot period through 2020 with the first adjustmenta final determination to be billed to customers effective December 1 each year for the 3 year pilot project.made as part of its pending rate case.

14 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

For more information on regulatory matters, see Item 8 - Note 16.19.
Environmental Matters The natural gas distribution operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental, facility-siting, zoning and planning laws and regulations. The Company believes its natural gas distribution operations believe it isare in substantial compliance with those regulations.
The Company's natural gas distribution operations are conditionally exemptvery small-quantity generators of hazardous waste, generators and subject only to minimum regulation under the RCRA. Washington state rule defines Cascade as a small-quantity generator, but regulation under the rule is similar to RCRA. Certain locations of the natural gas distribution operations routinely handle PCBs from their natural gas operations in accordance with federal requirements. PCB storage areas are registered with the EPA as required. Capital and operational expenditures for natural gas distribution operations could be affected in a variety of ways by potential new GHG legislation or regulation. In particular, such legislation or regulation would likely increase capital expenditures for energy efficiency and conservation programs and operational costs associated with GHG emissions compliance. Natural gas distribution operations expect to recover the operational and capital expenditures for GHG regulatory compliance in rates consistent with the recovery of other reasonable costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations.
The natural gas distribution operations did not incur any material environmental expenditures in 2017.2019. Except as to what may be ultimately determined with regard to the issues described in the following paragraph, the natural gas distribution operations do not expect to incur any material capital expenditures related to environmental compliance with current laws and regulations through 2020.2022.
Montana-Dakota and Great Plains havehas ties to six historic manufactured gas plants as a successor corporation or through direct ownership of the plant. Montana-Dakota is investigating onepossible soil and groundwater impacts due to the operation of two of these former manufactured gas plant sites and providing input on another site investigation conducted by a third party.sites. To the extent not covered by insurance, Montana-Dakota may seek recovery in its natural gas rates charged to customers for certain investigation and remediation costs incurred for these sites. Cascade has ties to nine historic manufactured gas plants as a successor corporation or through direct ownership of the plant. Cascade is involved in the investigation and remediation of three of these manufactured gas plants in Washington and Oregon. See Item 8 - Note 17 for a further discussion of these three manufactured gas plants. To the extent not covered by insurance, Cascade will seek recovery of investigation and remediation costs through its natural gas rates charged to customers.
See Item 8 - Note 20 for further discussion of certain manufactured gas plant sites.
Pipeline and Midstream
General WBI Energy owns and operates both regulated and nonregulated businesses. The regulated business of this segment, WBI Energy Transmission, owns and operates approximately 4,000 miles of natural gas transmission, gathering and storage lines in Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming. ThreeWBI Energy Transmission's underground storage fields in Montana and Wyoming provide storage services to local distribution companies, industrial customers, natural gas marketers and others, and serve to enhance system reliability. Its system is strategically located near fivefour natural gas producing basins, making natural gas supplies available to its transportation and storage customers. The system has 13 interconnecting points with other pipeline facilities allowing for the receipt and/or delivery of natural gas to and from other regions of the country and from Canada. Under the Natural Gas Act, as amended, WBI Energy Transmission is subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC regarding certificate, rate, service and accounting matters, and at December 31, 20172019, its net plant investment was $404.6$519.3 million.
The nonregulated business of this segment owns and operates gathering facilities in Montana and Wyoming. In total, facilities include approximately 800 miles of operated field gathering lines, some of which interconnect with WBI Energy's regulated pipeline system. The nonregulated business provides natural gas gathering services and a variety of other energy-related services, including cathodic protection and energy efficiency product sales and installation services to large end-users. In November 2016, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its ownership in the Pronghorn assets, which included a 50 percent undivided interest in a natural gas processing plant, both oil and gas gathering pipelines, an oil storage terminal and an oil pipeline in western North Dakota. The transaction closed in January 2017.

14 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

A majority of its pipeline and midstream business is transacted in the northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States.
System Supply, System Demand and Competition Natural gas supplies emanate from traditional and nontraditional production activities in the region from both on-system and off-system supply sources. New incrementalIncremental supply from nontraditional sources, have developed, such as the Bakken area in Montana and North Dakota, which hashave helped offset declines in traditional regional supply sources and supports WBI Energy Transmission's transportation and storage services. In addition, off-system supply sources are available through the Company's interconnections with other pipeline systems. WBI Energy Transmission will continuecontinues to look for opportunities to increase transportation gathering and storage services through system expansion and/or other pipeline interconnections or enhancements that could provide substantial future benefits.
WBI Energy Transmission's underground natural gas storage facilities have a certificated storage capacity of approximately 353 Bcf, including 193194 Bcf of working gas capacity, 8584 Bcf of cushion gas and 75 Bcf of native gas. These storage facilities enable customers to purchase natural gas throughout the year and meet winter peak requirements.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 15



Part I

WBI Energy Transmission competes with several pipelines for its customers' transportation, storage and gathering business and at times may discount rates in an effort to retain market share. However, the strategic location of its system near fivefour natural gas producing basins and the availability of underground storage and gathering services, along with interconnections with other pipelines, serve to enhance its competitive position.
Although certain of WBI Energy Transmission's firm customers, including its largest firm customer Montana-Dakota, serve relatively secure residential, commercial and industrial end-users, they generally all have some price-sensitive end-users that could switch to alternate fuels.
WBI Energy Transmission transports substantially all of Montana-Dakota's natural gas, primarily utilizing firm transportation agreements, which for 20172019 represented 3427 percent of WBI Energy Transmission's subscribed firm transportation contract demand. The majority of the firm transportation agreements with Montana-Dakota expire in June 2022. In addition, Montana-Dakota has contracts, expiring in July 2035, with WBI Energy Transmission to provide firm storage services to facilitate meeting Montana-Dakota's winter peak requirements expiring in July 2035.requirements.
The nonregulated business competes for existing customers in the fieldsareas in which it operates. Its focus on customer service and the variety of services it offers serve to enhance its competitive position.
Environmental Matters The pipeline and midstream operations are generally subject to federal, state and local environmental, facility-siting, zoning and planning laws and regulations. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with those regulations.
Ongoing operations are subject to the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the RCRA and other state and federal regulations. Administration of manycertain provisions of thesefederal environmental laws has been delegated to the states where WBI Energy and its subsidiaries operate. PermitAdministering agencies may issue permits with varying terms vary and all permits carry operational compliance conditions. Some permits require annual renewal, some have terms ranging from one to five years and others have no expiration date. Permits are renewed and modified, as necessary, based on defined permit expiration dates, operational demand, facility upgrades or modifications, and/or regulatory changes. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations.
Detailed environmental assessments and/or environmental impact statements as required by the National Environmental Policy Act are included in the FERC's environmental review process for both the construction and abandonment of WBI Energy Transmission's natural gas transmission pipelines, compressor stations and storage facilities.
The pipeline and midstream operations did not incur any material environmental expenditures in 20172019 and do not expect to incur any material capital expenditures related to environmental compliance with current laws and regulations through 2020.2022.
Construction Materials and Contracting
General Knife River operates construction materials and contracting businesses headquartered in Alaska, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming. These operations mine, processKnife River mines, processes and sellsells construction aggregates (crushed stone, sand and gravel); produceproduces and sellsells asphalt mix; and supplysupplies ready-mixed concrete. These products are used in most types of construction, performed by Knife River and other companies, including roads, freeways and bridges, as well as homes, schools, shopping centers, office buildings and industrial parks. Knife River focuses on vertical integration of its contracting services with its construction servicesmaterials to support the aggregate based product lines including aggregate placement, asphalt and concrete paving, and site development and grading. Although not common to all locations, other products include the sale of cement, liquid asphalt for various commercial and roadway applications, various finished concrete products and other building materials and related contracting services.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 15



Part I

During 2019, Knife River purchased additional aggregate deposits in Texas and received a permit to construct a rock crushing plant at the quarry. Knife River also completed two business combinations of ready-mixed concrete suppliers headquartered in Idaho and Oregon. For more information on business combinations, see Item 8 - Note 3.
Knife River's backlog was approximately $486$693 million, $538$706 million and $491$486 million at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in backlog at December 31, 2017, compared to backlog at December 31, 2016, was primarily attributable to a lower backlog of state agency work. Backlog increases with awards of new contracts and decreases as work is performed on existing contracts. Knife River expects to complete a significant amount of the backlog at December 31, 2017,2019, during the next 12 months. For more information on backlog including the timing of revenue recognition, see Item 8 - Note 2.
Knife River's backlog is comprised of the anticipated revenues from the uncompleted portion of services to be performed under job-specific contracts. A project is included in backlog when a contract is awarded and agreement on contract terms has been reached. However, backlog does not contain contracts for time and material projects that a fixed amount cannot be determined. Backlog is comprised of: (a) original contract amounts, (b) change orders for whichapproved by customers have approved and (c) claim amounts that have beenclaims made against customers, for which are determined to have a legal basis under existing contractual arrangements, and as tothe amount for which recovery is considered to be probable. Such claim amounts were immaterial for all periods presented. Backlog may be subject to delay, default or cancellation at the election of the customers. Historically, cancellations have not had a materially adverse effect on backlog. Due to the nature of its contractual arrangements,

16 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

in many instances Knife River's customers are not committed to the specific volumes of services to be purchased under a contract, but rather Knife River is committed to perform these services if and to the extent requested by the customer. Therefore, there can be no assurance as to the customers' requirements during a particular period or that such estimates, or backlog estimates in general, at any point in time are predictive of future revenues.
Competition Knife River's construction materials products and contracting services are marketed under highly competitive conditions. Price is the principal competitive force to which these products and services are subject, with service, quality, delivery time and proximity to the customer also being significant factors. Knife River focuses on markets located near aggregate sites to reduce transportation costs which allows Knife River to remain competitive with the pricing of aggregate products. The number and size of competitors varies in each of Knife River's principal market areas and product lines.
The demand for construction materials products and contracting services is significantly influenced by the cyclical nature of the construction industry in general. In addition, construction materials and contracting services activity in certain locations may be seasonal in nature due to the effects of weather. The key economic factors affecting product demand are changes in the level of local, state and federal governmental spending on roads and infrastructure projects, general economic conditions within the market area that influence both the commercial and residential sectors, and prevailing interest rates.
Knife River's customers are a diverse group which includes federal, state and municipal government agencies, commercial and residential developers, and private parties. The mix of sales by customer will vary each year depending on the work available. Knife River is not dependent on any single customer or group of customers for sales of its products and services, the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on its construction materials businesses.
Reserve Information Aggregate reserve estimates are calculated based on the best available data. This data is collected from drill holes and other subsurface investigations, as well as investigations of surface features such as mine high walls and other exposures of the aggregate reserves. Mine plans, production history and geologic data are also are utilized to estimate reserve quantities.
Estimates are based on analyses of the data described above by experienced internal mining engineers, operating personnel and geologists. Property setbacks and other regulatory restrictions and limitations are identified to determine the total area available for mining. Data described previously are used to calculate the thickness of aggregate materials to be recovered. Topography associated with alluvial sand and gravel deposits is typically flat and volumes of these materials are calculated by applying the thickness of the resource over the areas available for mining. Volumes are then converted to tons by using an appropriate conversion factor. Typically, 1.5 tons per cubic yard in the ground is used for sand and gravel deposits.
Topography associated with the hard rock reserves is typically much more diverse. Therefore, using available data, a final topography map is created and computer software is utilized to compute the volumes between the existing and final topographies. Volumes are then converted to tons by using an appropriate conversion factor. Typically, 2 tons per cubic yard in the ground is used for hard rock quarries.
Estimated reserves are probable reserves as defined in Securities Act Industry Guide 7. Remaining reserves are based on estimates of volumes that can be economically extracted and sold to meet current market and product applications. The reserve estimates include only salable tonnage and thus exclude waste materials that are generated in the crushing and processing phases of the operation. Approximately 891978 million tons of the 965 million1.1 billion tons of aggregate reserves are permitted reserves. The remaining reserves are on properties that are expected to be permitted for mining under current regulatory requirements. The data used to calculate the remaining reserves may require revisions in the future to account for changes in customer requirements and unknown geological occurrences. The years remaining were calculated by dividing remaining reserves by the three-year average sales, including estimated sales from 2015acquired reserves prior to acquisition, from 2017 through 2017.2019. Actual useful lives of these reserves will be subject to, among other things, fluctuations in customer demand, customer specifications, geological conditions and changes in mining plans.

 
16 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K17



Part I
 

The following table sets forth details applicable to the Company's aggregate reserves under ownership or lease as of December 31, 20172019, and sales for the years ended December 31, 20172019, 20162018 and 20152017:
Number of Sites
(Crushed Stone)
 
Number of Sites
(Sand & Gravel)
 Tons Sold (000's)
Estimated Reserves
(000's tons)

Lease Expiration
Reserve
Life
(years)

Number of Sites
(Crushed Stone)
 
Number of Sites
(Sand & Gravel)
 Tons Sold (000's)
Estimated Reserves
(000's tons)

Lease Expiration
Reserve
Life
(years)

 
Production Areaowned
leased
 owned
leased
 2017
2016
2015
owned
leased
 owned
leased
 2019
2018
2017
 
Anchorage, AK

 1

 1,425
1,343
1,837
14,548
N/A9


 1

 868
725
1,425
15,179
N/A15
 
Hawaii
5
 

 1,614
1,901
1,892
50,659
2018-206428

6
 

 1,680
1,734
1,614
47,979
2020-206429
 
Northern CA

 9
1
 1,785
1,604
1,580
43,812
201826


 8
1
 1,901
1,798
1,785
40,768
202822
 
Southern CA
2
 

 55
224
118
91,567
2035Over 100

2
 

 292
356
55
90,910
2035Over 100
 
Portland, OR1
3
 5
3
 4,694
4,044
3,562
213,018
2025-205752
2
4
 5
3
 4,868
5,402
4,694
204,583
2025-205541
 
Eugene, OR3
4
 6

 633
662
819
153,975
2021-2049Over 100
3
4
 6

 1,205
743
633
158,558
2021-2049Over 100
 
Central OR/WA/ID
1
 5
2
 2,160
1,685
1,493
86,307
2020-208749

1
 9
2
 2,700
2,362
2,160
85,181
2028-207735
 
Southwest OR5
5
 10
6
 2,367
2,689
1,872
100,875
2019-205344
5
5
 10
6
 1,932
2,395
2,367
107,098
2020-205348
 
Central MT

 3
2
 1,065
1,135
1,383
28,294
2023-202724


 3
1
 822
1,081
1,065
14,417
202315
 
Northwest MT

 8
1
 1,745
1,514
1,423
64,451
202041


 9
1
 2,084
1,965
1,745
61,098
202032
 
Wyoming

 1
2
 613
742
888
10,092
2019-202013


 
2
 837
626
613
8,762
2020-202613
 
Central MN
1
 33
8
 2,773
2,831
2,556
50,092
2018-202818
1
1
 41
7
 3,477
2,890
2,773
62,381
2020-202820
*
Northern MN2

 14
2
 270
537
595
23,248
2018-202150
2

 14
2
 330
369
270
20,555
2020-202164
 
ND/SD

 2
17
 1,100
1,643
1,959
24,389
2019-202816
1

 2
29
 3,747
1,506
1,100
70,921
2020-203133
*
Texas1
2
 1

 1,192
1,243
1,138
9,709
2022-20298
1
2
 4

 1,378
1,094
1,192
65,796
2022-202954
 
Sales from other sources    4,722
3,783
3,844
       4,193
4,749
4,722
    
    28,213
27,580
26,959
965,036
      32,314
29,795
28,213
1,054,186
   
*Includes estimate of three-year average sales for acquired reserves.
The 965 million1.1 billion tons of estimated aggregate reserves at December 31, 2017,2019, are comprised of 457572 million tons on properties that are owned and 508482 million tons that are leased. Approximately 4538 percent of the tons under lease have lease expiration dates of 20 years or more. The weighted average years remaining on all leases containing estimated probable aggregate reserves is approximately 2321 years, including options for renewal that are at Knife River's discretion. Based on a three-year average of sales from 20152017 through 20172019 of leased reserves, the average time necessary to produce remaining aggregate reserves from such leases is approximately 4743 years. Some sites have leases that expire prior to the exhaustion of the estimated reserves. The estimated reserve life assumes, based on Knife River's experience, that leases will be renewed to allow sufficient time to fully recover these reserves.
The changes in Knife River's aggregate reserves for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (000's of tons)
  (000's of tons)
 
Aggregate reserves:  
Beginning of year989,084
1,022,513
1,061,156
1,014,431
965,036
989,084
Acquisitions(a)2,726
24,993
7,406
71,157
81,004
2,726
Sales volumes*(23,491)(23,797)(23,115)
Other**(3,283)(34,625)(22,934)
Sales volumes (b)(28,121)(25,046)(23,491)
Other (c)(3,281)(6,563)(3,283)
End of year965,036
989,084
1,022,513
1,054,186
1,014,431
965,036
*(a)Includes reserves from acquisitions of businesses.
(b)Excludes sales from other sources.
**(c)Includes property sales, revisions of previous estimates and expiring leases.
 
Environmental Matters Knife River's construction materials and contracting operations are subject to regulation customary for such operations, including federal, state and local environmental compliance and reclamation regulations. Except as to the issues described later, Knife River believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations. Individual permits applicable to Knife River's various operations are managed largely by local operations, particularlyand tracked as they relate to the statuses of the application, modification, renewal, compliance and reporting procedures.
Knife River's asphalt and ready-mixed concrete manufacturing plants and aggregate processing plants are subject to the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act requirements for controlling air emissions and water discharges. Some mining and construction activities are also are subject to these laws. In most of the states where Knife River operates, these regulatory programs have been delegated to state and local regulatory authorities. Knife River's facilities are also are subject to the RCRA as it applies to the management of hazardous wastes and

 
18 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K17



Part I
 

underground storage tank systems. These programs also have generally been delegated to the state and local authorities in the states where Knife River operates. Knife River's facilities must comply with requirements for managing wastes and underground storage tank systems.
Some Knife River activities are directly regulated by federal agencies. For example, certain in-water mining operations are subject to provisions of the Clean Water Act that are administered by the Army Corps. Knife River operateshas several such operations, including gravel bar skimming and dredging operations, and Knife River has the associated permits as required. The expiration dates of these permits vary, with five years generally being the longest term.
Knife River's operations are also are occasionally subject to the ESA. For example, land use regulations often require environmental studies, including wildlife studies, before a permit may be granted for a new or expanded mining facility or an asphalt or concrete plant. If endangered species or their habitats are identified, ESA requirements for protection, mitigation or avoidance apply. Endangered species protection requirements are usually included as part of land use permit conditions. Typical conditions include avoidance, setbacks, restrictions on operations during certain times of the breeding or rearing season, and construction or purchase of mitigation habitat. Knife River's operations are also are subject to state and federal cultural resources protection laws when new areas are disturbed for mining operations or processing plants. Land use permit applications generally require that areas proposed for mining or other surface disturbances be surveyed for cultural resources. If any are identified, they must be protected or managed in accordance with regulatory agency requirements.
The most comprehensive environmental permit requirements are usually associated with new mining operations, although requirements vary widely from state to state and even within states. In some areas, land use regulations and associated permitting requirements are minimal. However, some states and local jurisdictions have very demanding requirements for permitting new mines. Environmental impact reports are sometimes required before a mining permit application can be considered for approval. These reports can take up to several years to complete. The report can include projected impacts of the proposed project on air and water quality, wildlife, noise levels, traffic, scenic vistas and other environmental factors. The reports generally include suggested actions to mitigate the projected adverse impacts.
Provisions for public hearings and public comments are usually included in land use permit application review procedures in the counties where Knife River operates. After taking into accountconsidering environmental, mine plan and reclamation information provided by the permittee, as well as comments from the public and other regulatory agencies, the local authority approves or denies the permit application. Denial is rare, but land use permits often include conditions that must be addressed by the permittee. Conditions may include property line setbacks, reclamation requirements, environmental monitoring and reporting, operating hour restrictions, financial guarantees for reclamation, and other requirements intended to protect the environment or address concerns submitted by the public or other regulatory agencies.
Knife River has been successful in obtaining mining and other land use permit approvals so sufficient permitted reserves are available to support its operations. For mining operations, this often requires considerable advanced planning to ensure sufficient time is available to complete the permitting process before the newly permitted aggregate reserve is needed to support Knife River's operations.
Knife River's Gascoyne surface coal mine last produced coal in 1995 but continues to be subject to reclamation requirements of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, as well as the North Dakota Surface Mining Act. Portions of the Gascoyne Mine remain under reclamation bond until the 10-year revegetation liability period has expired. A portion of the original permit has been released from bond and additional areas are currently in the process of having the bond released. Knife River's intention is to request bond release as soon as it is deemed possible.
Knife River did not incur any material environmental expenditures in 20172019 and, except as to what may be ultimately determined with regard to the issues described in the following paragraph, Knife River does not expect to incur any material expenditures related to environmental compliance with current laws and regulations through 2020.2022.
In December 2000, Knife River - Northwest was named by the EPA as a PRP in connection with the cleanup of a commercial property site, acquired by Knife River - Northwest in 1999, and part of the Portland, Oregon, Harbor Superfund Site. For more information, see Item 8 - Note 17.20.
Mine Safety The Dodd-Frank Act requires disclosure of certain mine safety information. For more information, see Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures.
Construction Services
General MDU Construction Services provides inside and outside specialty contracting services. Its inside services include design, construction and maintenance of electrical and communication wiring and infrastructure, fire suppression systems, and mechanical piping and services. Its outside services include design, construction and maintenance of overhead and underground electrical distribution and transmission lines, substations, external lighting, traffic signalization, and gas pipelines, as well as utility excavation and the manufacture and distribution of transmission line construction equipment. Its inside services include design, construction and maintenance of electrical and communication wiring and infrastructure, fire suppression systems, and mechanical piping and services. This businesssegment also designs, constructs and maintains renewable energy projects. These

 
18 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K19



Part I
 

These specialty contracting services are provided to utilities and large manufacturing, commercial, industrial, institutional and government customers.
During 2019, MDU Construction Services purchased the assets of an electrical construction company in Redmond, Washington. For more information on business combinations, see Item 8 - Note 3.
Construction and maintenance crews are active year round. However, activity in certain locations may be seasonal in nature due to the effects of weather. MDU Construction Services works with the National Electrical Contractors Association, the IBEW and other trade associations on hiring and recruiting a qualified workforce.
MDU Construction Services operates a fleet of owned and leased trucks and trailers, support vehicles and specialty construction equipment, such as backhoes, excavators, trenchers, generators, boring machines and cranes. In addition, as of December 31, 20172019, MDU Construction Services owned or leased facilities in 1716 states. This space is used for offices, equipment yards, manufacturing, warehousing, storage and vehicle shops.
MDU Construction Services’ backlog at December 31 was as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
(In millions)(In millions)
Inside specialty contracting$625
$435
$408
$908
$814
$625
Outside specialty contracting83
40
85
236
125
83
$708
$475
$493
$1,144
$939
$708
The increase in backlog at December 31, 2017,2019, compared to backlog at December 31, 2016,2018, was primarilylargely attributable to an increasethe new project opportunities that MDU Construction Services continues to be awarded across its diverse operations, particularly inside specialty electrical and mechanical contracting in projects from all revenue streams based on customer demand.the hospitality, high-tech, mission critical and public industries. MDU Construction Services' outside power, communications and natural gas specialty contracting also have a high volume of available work. Backlog increases with awards of new contracts and decreases as work is performed on existing contracts. MDU Construction Services expects to complete a significant amount of the backlog at December 31, 2017,2019, during the next 12 months. Additionally, MDU Construction Services continues to further evaluate potential business combination opportunities that would be accretive to its business and grow its backlog. For more information on backlog including the timing of revenue recognition, see Item 8 - Note 2.
MDU Construction Services’ backlog is comprised of the anticipated revenues from the uncompleted portion of services to be performed under job-specific contracts. A project is included in backlog when a contract is awarded and agreement on contract terms has been reached. However, backlog does not contain contracts for time and material projects that a fixed amount cannot be determined. Backlog is comprised of: (a) original contract amounts, (b) change orders for whichapproved by customers, have approved, (c) pending change orders expected to receive confirmation in the ordinary course of business and (d) claim amounts that have beenclaims made against customers, for which are determined to have a legal basis under existing contractual arrangements, and as tothe amount for which recovery is considered to be probable. Such claim amounts were immaterial for all periods presented. Backlog may be subject to delay, default or cancellation at the election of the customers. Historically, cancellations have not had a material adverse effect on backlog. Due to the nature of its contractual arrangements, in many instances MDU Construction Services' customers are not committed to the specific volumes of services to be purchased under a contract, but rather MDU Construction Services is committed to perform these services if and to the extent requested by the customer. Therefore, there can be no assurance as to the customers' requirements during a particular period or that such estimates, or backlog estimates in general, at any point in time are predictive of future revenues.
MDU Construction Services works with the National Electrical Contractors Association, the IBEW and other trade associations on hiring and recruiting a qualified workforce.
Competition MDU Construction Services operates in a highly competitive business environment. Most of MDU Construction Services' work is obtained on the basis of competitive bids or by negotiation of either cost-plus or fixed-price contracts. MDU Construction Services expects bidding activity to remain strong for both inside and outside specialty construction companies in 2020. The workforce and equipment are highly mobile, providing greater flexibility in the size and location of MDU Construction Services' market area. Competition is based primarily on price and reputation for quality, safety and reliability. The size and location of the services provided, as well as the state of the economy, will be factors in the number of competitors that MDU Construction Services will encounter on any particular project. MDU Construction Services believes that the diversification of the services it provides, the markets it serves throughout the United States and the quality and management of its workforce will enable it to effectively operate in this competitive environment.
Utilities and independent contractors represent the largest customer base for this segment. Accordingly, utility and subcontract work accounts for a significant portion of the work performed by MDU Construction Services and the amount of construction contracts is

20 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

dependent to a certain extent on the level and timing of maintenance and construction programs undertaken by customers. MDU Construction Services relies on repeat customers and strives to maintain successful long-term relationships with these customers.
Environmental Matters MDU Construction Services' operations are subject to regulation customary for the industry, including federal, state and local environmental compliance. MDU Construction Services believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 19



Part I

The nature of MDU Construction Services' operations is such that few, if any, environmental permits are required. Operational convenience supports the use of petroleum storage tanks in several locations, which are permitted under state programs authorized by the EPA. MDU Construction Services has no ongoing remediation related to releases from petroleum storage tanks. MDU Construction Services' operations are conditionally exempt small-quantity waste generators, subject to minimal regulation under the RCRA. Federal permits for specific construction and maintenance jobs that may require these permits are typically obtained by the hiring entity, and not by MDU Construction Services.
MDU Construction Services did not incur any material environmental expenditures in 20172019 and does not expect to incur any material capital expenditures related to environmental compliance with current laws and regulations through 2020.2022.
For information regarding construction services litigation, see Item 8 - Note 17.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company's business and financial results are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those set forth below and in other documents that it filesfiled with the SEC. The factors and the other matters discussed herein are important factors that could cause actual results or outcomes for the Company to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements included elsewhere in this document. If any of the risks described below actually occur, the Company's business, prospects, financial condition or financial results could be materially harmed.
Economic Risks
The Company is subject to government regulations that may delay and/or have a negative impact on its business and its results of operations and cash flows. Statutory and regulatory requirements also may limit another party's ability to acquire the Company or impose conditions on an acquisition of or by the Company.
The Company's electric and natural gas transmission and distribution businesses are subject to comprehensive regulation by federal, state and local regulatory agencies with respect to, among other things, allowed rates of return and recovery of investmentinvestments and cost,costs, financing, rate structures, customer service, health care coverage and cost, income taxes, property and othercosts, taxes, franchises; recovery of purchased power and purchased natural gas costs; and construction and siting of generation and transmission facilities. These governmental regulations significantly influence the Company's operating environment and may affect its ability to recover costs from its customers. The Company is unable to predict the impact on operating results from the future regulatory activities of any of these agencies. Changes in regulations or the imposition of additional regulations could have an adverse impact on the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
There can be no assurance that applicable regulatory commissions will determine all the costs ofthat the Company's electric and natural gas transmission and distribution businesses tobusinesses' costs have been prudent, which could result in disallowance of costs. Also, the regulatory process for approval ofapproving rates for these businesses may not result inallow for timely and full recovery of the costs of providing services.services or a return on the Company's invested capital. Changes in regulatory requirements or operating conditions may require early retirement of certain assets. While regulation typically provides relief for these types of retirements, there is no assurance the regulators will allow full recovery of all remaining costs, leavingwhich could leave stranded asset costs. Rising fuel costs could increase the risk that the utility businesses will not be able to fully recover those fuel costs from their customers.
Approval from a number of federal and state regulatory agencies would need to be obtained by any potential acquirerneeded for acquisition of the Company, as well as for certain acquisitions by the Company. The approval process could be lengthy and the outcome uncertain, which may deferdeter potential acquirers from approaching the Company or impact the Company's ability to pursue otherwise attractive acquisitions.
Economic volatility affects the Company's operations, as well as the demand for its products and services.
Unfavorable economic conditions can negatively affect the level of public and private expenditures on projects and the timing of these projects which, in turn, can negatively affect the demand for the Company's products and services, primarily at the Company's construction businesses. The level of demand for construction products and services could be adversely impacted by the economic conditions in the industries the Company serves, as well as in the economy in general.general economy. State and federal budget issues affect the funding available for infrastructure spending.
The ability ofEconomic conditions and population growth affect the Company's electric and natural gas distribution businesses to growbusinesses' growth in service territory, customer base and usage demand is affected bydemand. Economic volatility in the markets served, along with economic environments and population growthconditions such as increased unemployment, which

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 21



Part I

could impact the ability of the markets served. This economic volatilityCompany's customers to make payments, could have a material adverse effect onadversely affect the Company's results of operations, cash flows and asset values. Further, any material decreases in customers' energy demand, by customers, for economic or other reasons, could have a material adverse impact on the Company's earnings and results of operations.

20 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

The Company's operations involve risks that may result from catastrophic events.
The Company's operations, particularly those related to natural gas and electric transmission and distribution, include a variety of inherent hazards and operating risks, such as product leaks, explosions, mechanical failures, vandalism, fires, acts of terrorism and acts of war, which could result in loss of human life; personal injury; property damage; environmental pollution; impairment of operations; and substantial financial losses. The Company maintains insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses. The occurrenceA significant incident could also increase regulatory scrutiny and result in penalties and higher amounts of these lossescapital expenditures and operational costs. Losses not fully covered by insurance could have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company relies on financing sources and capital markets. Access to these markets may be adversely affected by factors beyondA disruption of the regional electric transmission grid or interstate natural gas infrastructure could negatively impact the Company's control. If the Company is unable to obtain cost effective financing in the future,business and reputation. Because the Company's ability to execute its business plans, make capital expenditures or pursue acquisitions that the Company may otherwise rely on for future growthelectric and natural gas utility and pipeline systems are part of larger interconnecting systems, a disruption could be impaired. Asresult in a result, the market value of the Company's common stock may be adversely affected. If the Company issues a substantial amount of common stock itsignificant decrease in revenues and system repair costs, which could have a dilutive effectmaterial impact on its existing shareholders.the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company is subject to capital market and interest rate risks.
The Company's operations, particularly its electric and natural gas transmission and distribution businesses, require significant capital investment. TheConsequently, the Company relies on the issuance of long-term debtfinancing sources and equity securitiescapital markets as sources of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by its cash flowflows from operations. If the Company is not able to access capital at competitive rates, including through its current "at-the-market" offering program, the ability to implement its business plans, make capital expenditures or pursue acquisitions that the Company would otherwise rely on for future growth may be adversely affected. Market disruptions may increase the cost of borrowing or adversely affect itsthe Company's ability to access one or more financial markets. Such disruptions could include:
A significant economic downturndownturn.
The financial distress of unrelated industry leaders in the same line of businessbusiness.
Deterioration in capital market conditionsconditions.
Turmoil in the financial services industryindustry.
Volatility in commodity pricesprices.
Terrorist attacksattacks.
CyberattacksCyberattacks.
The issuance of a substantial amount of the Company's common stock, whether issued in connection with an acquisition or otherwise, could have a dilutive effect on existing shareholders, or the perception that such an issuance could occur, could have a dilutive effect on shareholders and/or may adversely affect the market price of the Company's common stock. Higher interest rates on borrowings could also have an adverse effect on the Company's operating results.
Financial market changes could impact the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans and obligations.
The Company has pension and postretirement defined benefit plans for some of its employees and former employees. Assumptions regarding future costs, returns on investments, interest rates and other actuarial assumptions have a significant impact on the funding requirements and expense recorded relating to these plans. Adverse changes in economic indicators, such as consumer spending, inflation data, interest rate changes, political developments and threats of terrorism, among other things, can create volatility in the financial markets which could change these assumptions and negatively affect the value of assets held in the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plans and may increase the amount and accelerate the timing of required funding contributions for those plans.
Significant changes in energy prices could negatively affect the Company's businesses.
Fluctuations in oil, NGL and natural gas production and prices; fluctuations in commodity price basis differentials; supplies of domestic and foreign oil, NGL and natural gas; political and economic conditions in oil-producing countries; actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries; and other external factors impact the development of oil and natural gas supplies and the expansion and operation of natural gas pipeline systems. Prolonged depressed prices for oil, NGL and natural gas could negatively affect the growth, results of operations, cash flows and asset values of the Company's pipeline and midstream business.
If oil and natural gas prices increase significantly, customer demand for utility, pipeline and midstream, and construction materials could decline, which could have a material impact on the Company's results of operations and cash flows. While the Company has fuel clause recovery mechanisms for its utility operations in most of the states in which it operates, higher utility fuel costs could significantly impact results of operations if such costs are not recovered. Delays in the collection of utility fuel cost recoveries, as compared to expenditures for fuel purchases, could have a negative impact on the Company's cash flows. High oil prices also affect the cost and demand for asphalt

22 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

products and related contracting services. Low commodity prices could have a positive impact on sales but could negatively impact oil and natural gas production activities and subsequently the Company's pipeline and construction revenues in energy producing states in which the Company operates.
Reductions in the Company's credit ratings could increase financing costs.
There is no assurance the Company's current credit ratings, or those of its subsidiaries, will remain in effect or that a rating will not be lowered or withdrawn by a rating agency. Events affecting the Company's financial results may impact its cash flows and credit metrics, potentially resulting in a change in the Company's credit ratings. The Company's credit ratings may also change as a result of the differing methodologies or changes in the methodologies used by the rating agencies. A downgrade in credit ratings could lead to higher borrowing costs.
Increasing costs associated with health care plans may adversely affect the Company's results of operations.
The Company's self-insured costs of health care benefits for eligible employees continues to increase. Increasing quantities of large individual health care claims and an overall increase in total health care claims could have an adverse impact on operating results, financial position and liquidity. Legislation related to health care could also change the Company's benefit program and costs.
The Company is exposed to risk of loss resulting from the nonpayment and/or nonperformance by the Company's customers and counterparties.
If the Company's customers or counterparties experience financial difficulties, the Company could experience difficulty in collecting receivables. Nonpayment and/or nonperformance by the Company's customers and counterparties, particularly customers and counterparties of the Company’s construction materials and contracting and construction services businesses for large construction projects, could have a negative impact on the Company's results of operations and cash flows. The Company could also have indirect credit risk from participating in energy markets such as MISO in which credit losses are socialized to all participants.
Changes in tax law may negatively affect the Company's business.
Changes to federal, state and local tax laws have the ability to benefit or adversely affect the Company's earnings and customer costs. Significant changes to corporate tax rates could result in the impairment of deferred tax assets that are established based on existing law at the time of deferral. Changes to the value of various tax credits could change the economics of resources and the resource selection for the electric generation business. Regulation incorporates changes in tax law into the rate-setting process for the regulated energy delivery businesses and therefore could create timing delays before the impact of changes are realized.
The Company's operations could be negatively impacted by import tariffs and/or other government mandates.
The Company operates in or provides services to capital intensive industries in which federal trade policies could significantly impact the availability and cost of materials. Imposed and proposed tariffs could significantly increase the prices and delivery lead times on raw materials and finished products that are critical to the Company and its customers, such as aluminum and steel. Prolonged lead times on the delivery of raw materials and further tariff increases on raw materials and finished products could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
Operational Risks
Significant portions of the Company’s natural gas pipelines and power generation and transmission facilities are aging. The aging infrastructure may require significant additional maintenance or replacement that could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
The Company’s energy delivery infrastructure is aging, which increases certain risks, including breakdown or failure of equipment, pipeline leaks and fires developing from power lines. Aging infrastructure is more prone to failure which increases maintenance costs, unplanned outages and the need to replace facilities. Even if properly maintained, reliability may ultimately deteriorate and negatively affect the Company’s ability to serve its customers, which could result in increased costs associated with regulatory oversight. The costs associated with maintaining the aging infrastructure and capital expenditures for new or replacement infrastructure could cause rate volatility and/or regulatory lag in some jurisdictions. If, at the end of its life, the investment costs of a facility have not been fully recovered the Company may be adversely affected if commissions do not allow such costs to be recovered in rates. Such impacts of an aging infrastructure could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.
Additionally, hazards from aging infrastructure could result in serious injury, loss of human life, significant damage to property, environmental impacts, and impairment of operations, which in turn could lead to substantial losses. The location of facilities near populated areas, including residential areas, business centers, industrial sites, and other public gathering places, could increase the level of damages resulting from these risks. A major incident involving another natural gas system could lead to additional capital expenditures, increased regulation, and fines and penalties on natural gas utilities. The occurrence of any of these events could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 23



Part I

The Company's utility and pipeline operations are subject to planning risks.
Most electric and natural gas utility investments, including natural gas transmission pipeline investments, are made with the intent of being used for decades. In particular, electric transmission and generation resources are planned well in advance of when they are placed into service based upon resource plans using assumptions over the planning horizon; including sales growth, commodity prices, equipment and construction costs, regulatory treatment, available technology and public policy. Public policy changes and technology advancements related to areas such as energy efficient appliances and buildings, renewable and distributive electric generation and storage, carbon dioxide emissions, electric vehicle penetration, and natural gas availability and cost may significantly impact the planning assumptions. Changes in critical planning assumptions may result in excess generation, transmission and distribution resources creating increased per customer costs and downward pressure on load growth. These changes could also result in a stranded investment if the Company is unable to fully recover the costs of its investments.
The regulatory approval, permitting, construction, startup and/or operation of pipelines, and power generation and transmission facilities, and aggregate reserves may involve unanticipated events, delays and unrecoverable costs.
The construction, startup and operation of natural gas pipelines and electric power generation and transmission facilities involve many risks, which may include:include delays; breakdown or failure of equipment; inability to obtain required governmental permits and approvals; inability to obtain or renew easements; public opposition; inability to complete financing; inability to negotiate acceptable equipment acquisition, construction, fuel supply, off-take, transmission, transportation or other material agreements; changes in markets and market prices for power; cost increases and overruns; the risk of performance below expected levels of output or efficiency; and the inability to obtain full cost recovery in regulated rates. Additionally, in a number of states in which the Company operates, it can be difficult to permit new aggregate sites or expand existing aggregate sites due to community resistance. Such unanticipated events could negatively impact the Company's business, its results of operations and cash flows.
Additionally, operatingOperating or other costs required to comply with current or potential pipeline safety regulations and potential new regulations under various agencies could be significant. The regulations require verification of pipeline infrastructure records by pipeline owners and operators to confirm the maximum allowable operating pressure of certain lines. Increased emphasis on pipeline safety issues and increased regulatory scrutiny may result in penalties and higher costs of operations. If these costs are not fully recoverable from customers, they could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.
Financial market changes could impact the Company’s pension and post-retirement benefit plans and obligations.
The global demand and price volatility for natural resources, interest rate changes, governmental budget constraints and threat of terrorism can create volatility in the financial markets. Changing financial market conditions could negatively affect the value of assets held in the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plans and may increase the amount and accelerate the timing of required funding contributions for those plans as well liabilities and funding requirements for multiemployer plans to which the Company is a participating employer.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 21



Part I

The backlogs at the Company's construction materials and contracting and construction services businesses may not accurately represent future revenue.
Backlog consists of the uncompleted portion of services to be performed under job-specific contracts. Contracts are subject to delay, default or cancellation, and the contracts in the Company's backlog are subject to changes in the scope of services to be provided, as well as adjustments to the costs relating to the applicable contracts. Backlog may also be affected by project delays or cancellations resulting from weather conditions, external market factors and economic factors beyond the Company's control. Accordingly, there is no assurance that backlog will be realized. The timing of contract awards, duration of large new contracts and the mix of services can significantly affect backlog. Backlog at any given point in time may not accurately represent the revenue or net income that is realized in any period, and the backlog as of the end of the year may not be indicative of the revenue and net income expected to be earned in the following year and should not be relied upon as a stand-alone indicator of future revenues or net income.
The Company's pipelineEnvironmental and midstream business is dependent on factors, including commodity prices and commodity price basis differentials, that are subject to external influences.
Fluctuations in oil, NGL and natural gas production and prices; fluctuations in commodity price basis differentials; domestic and foreign supplies of oil, NGL and natural gas; political and economic conditions in oil producing countries; actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries; and other external factors impact the development of natural gas supplies and the expansion and operation of natural gas pipeline systems. Prolonged depressed prices for oil, NGL and natural gas could negatively affect the growth, results of operations, cash flows and asset values of the Company's pipeline and midstream business.
Reductions in the Company's credit ratings could increase financing costs.
There is no assurance that the Company's current credit ratings, or those of its subsidiaries, will remain in effect or that a rating will not be lowered or withdrawn by a rating agency. The Company's credit ratings may also change as a result of the differing methodologies or changes in the methodologies used by the rating agencies. A downgrade in credit ratings could lead to higher borrowing costs. A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is applicable only to the specific security to which it applies. Investors should make their own evaluation as to whether an investment in the security is appropriate.
Increasing costs associated with health care plans may adversely affect the Company's results of operations.Regulatory Risks
The Company's self-insured costsoperations could be adversely impacted by climate change.
Severe weather events, such as tornadoes, rain, ice and snowstorms and high and low temperature extremes, occur in regions in which the Company operates and maintains infrastructure. Climate change could change the frequency and severity of health care benefits for eligible employees continuesthese weather events, which may create physical and financial risks to increase. Increasing levels of large individual health care claims and overall health care claimsthe Company. Such risks could have an adverse impacteffect on operating results, financial position and liquidity. Legislation related to health care could also change the Company's benefit program and costs.
The Company is exposed to risk of loss resulting from the nonpayment and/or nonperformance by the Company's customers and counterparties.
If the Company's customers or counterparties experience financial difficulties, the Company could experience difficulty in collecting receivables. The nonpayment and/or nonperformance by the Company's customers and counterparties, particularly customers and counterparties of the Company’s construction materials and contracting and construction services businesses for large construction projects, could have a negative impact on the Company'scondition, results of operations and cash flows.
Severe weather events may damage or disrupt the Company's electric and natural gas transmission and distribution facilities, which could increase costs to repair facilities and restore service to customers. The cost of providing service could increase to the extent the frequency of severe weather events increases because of climate change or otherwise. The Company may also have indirect credit risk duenot recover all costs related to participationmitigating these physical risks.
Severe weather may result in energy markets such as MISO in which credit losses are socialized to all participants.
Changes in tax law may negatively affect the Company's business.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the TCJA that significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The TCJA, among other things, includes reductions to United States federal tax rates, repeals the domestic production deduction, disallows regulated utility property for immediate expensing, and modifies or repeals many other business deductions and credits. The changesdisruptions to the Internal Revenue Codepipeline and midstream business's natural gas supply and transportation systems, and potentially increase the cost of gas and the natural gas utility's ability to procure gas to meet customer demand. These changes could materially impact the Company. Future guidance, regulationsresult in increased maintenance and interpretations clarifying items within the TCJA may be contrary to the Company’s current interpretation orcapital costs, disruption of service, regulatory actions and could have an adverse impactlower customer satisfaction.
Increases in severe weather conditions or extreme temperature may cause infrastructure construction projects to the Company. The Company continues to examine the impact the TCJA may have on the Companybe delayed or canceled and limit resources available for such projects resulting in future periods. The TCJA's impact on the economy, including overall demand and competition for the products and services the Company provides and associated labor availability anddecreased revenue or increased project costs is unknown and there could be negative impacts to the Company. The Company's utility businesses' cash flows may be negatively impacted by the disallowance of immediate expensing of utility property. Other changes to federal and state tax laws have the ability to benefit or adversely affect the Company's earnings and customer costs. Significant changes to corporate tax rates could result in the impairment of deferred tax assets that are established based on existing law at the time of deferral. Changes to the value of various tax credits could change the economics of resourcesconstruction materials and the resource selection for the electric generation business. Regulation incorporates

 
2224 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I
 

changes in tax law intocontracting and construction services businesses. In addition, drought conditions could restrict the rate setting process foravailability of water supplies, inhibiting the regulated energy deliveryability of the construction businesses and therefore could create timing delays before the impact of changes are realized.
Environmental and Regulatory Risks
The Company's operations could be adversely impacted by climate change.
Climate change may create physical and financial risks to the Company. Such risks could have an adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.conduct operations.
Utility customers’ energy needs vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity. For residential customers, heating and cooling represent the largest energy use. To the extent weather conditions are affected by climate change, customers’ energy use could increase or decrease. Increased energy use by its utility customers due to weather changes may require the Company to invest in additional generating assets, transmission and other infrastructure to serve increased load. Decreased energy use due to weather changes may result in decreased revenues. Extreme weather conditions, such as uncommonly long periods of high or low ambient temperature, in general require more system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system stress, including service interruptions. Weather conditions outside of the Company's service territory could also have an impact on revenues. The Company buys and sells electricity that might be generated outside its service territory, depending upon system needs and market opportunities. Extreme weather conditions creatingtemperatures may create high energy demand mayand raise electricity prices, which wouldcould increase the cost of energy provided to customers.
Severe weather impacts the Company's utility service territories, primarily when thunderstorms, tornadoes and snow or ice storms occur. Severe weather events may damage or disrupt the Company's electric and natural gas transmission and distribution facilities, which could increase costs to repair damaged facilities and restore service to customers. The cost of providing service could increase to the extent the frequency of extreme weather events increases because of climate change or otherwise. The Company may not recover all costs related to mitigating these physical risks.
Severe weather may result in disruptions to the pipeline and midstream business's natural gas supply and transportation systems. These changes could result in increased maintenance and capital costs, disruption of service, regulatory actions and lower customer satisfaction.
Extreme weather conditions caused by climate change or otherwise may cause infrastructure construction projects to be delayed or canceled and limit resources available for such projects increasing the project costs at the construction materials and contracting and construction services businesses.
Climate change may impact a region’s economic health, which could impact revenues at all of the Company's businesses. The Company's financial performance is tied to the health of the regional economies served. The Company provides natural gas and electric utility service, as well as construction materials and services, for some states and communities that are economically affected by the agriculture industry. Increases in severe weather events or significant changes in temperature and precipitation patterns could adversely affect the agriculture industry and, correspondingly, the economies of the states and communities affected by that industry.
The insurance industry has also been adversely affected by severe weather events which may impact the availability of insurance coverage, insurance premiums and insurance policy terms.
The Company may also be subject to litigation related to climate change. Costs of such litigation could be significant, and an adverse outcome could require substantial capital expenditures, changes in operations and possible payment of penalties or damages, which could affect the Company's results of operations and cash flows if the costs are not recoverable in rates.
The price of energy also has an impact on the economic health of communities. The cost of additional regulatory requirements to combat climate change, such as regulation of carbon dioxide emissions under the Clean Air Act, or other environmental regulation or taxes could impact the availability of goods and the prices charged by suppliers, which would normally be borne by consumers through higher prices for energy and purchased goods. To the extent financial markets view climate change and emissions of GHGs as a financial risk, this could negatively affect the Company's ability to access capital markets or cause less than ideal terms and conditions.
The Company's operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase costs of operations, impact or limit business plans, or expose the Company to environmental liabilities.
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations affecting many aspects of its operations, regardingincluding air and water quality, wastewater discharge, the generation, transmission and disposal of solid waste managementand hazardous substances, aggregate permitting and other environmental considerations. These laws and regulations can increase capital, operating and other costs,costs; cause delays as a result of litigation and administrative proceedings,proceedings; and create compliance, remediation, containment, monitoring and reporting obligations, particularly relating to electric generation, permitting and environmental compliance for construction material facilities, natural gas gathering, and transmission and storage operations. Environmental laws and regulations can also require the Company to install pollution control equipment at its facilities, clean up spills and other contamination and correct environmental hazards, including payment of all or part of the cost to remediate sites where the Company's past activities, or the activities of other parties, caused environmental contamination. These laws and regulations generally require the Company to obtain and comply with a variety of environmental licenses, permits, inspections and other approvals.approvals and may cause the Company to shut down existing facilities due to difficulties in assuring compliance or where the cost of compliance makes operation of the facilities no longer economical. Although the Company strives to comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, public and private entities and private individuals may interpret the Company's legal or regulatory requirements differently and seek injunctive relief or other remedies against the Company. The Company cannot predict the outcome, financial or operational, of any such litigation or administrative proceedings.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 23



Part I

Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised and new laws and regulations seeking to protect the environment may be adopted or become applicable to the Company. These laws and regulations could require the Company to limit the use or output of certain facilities,facilities; restrict the use of certain fuels,fuels; retire and replace certain facilities,facilities; install pollution controls,controls; remediate environmental impacts,impacts; remove or reduce environmental hazards,hazards; or forego or limit the development of resources. Revised or new laws and regulations that increase compliance costs or restrict operations, particularly if costs are not fully recoverable from customers, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
On April 17, 2015, the EPA published a rule, under the RCRA, for coal combustion residuals that regulates coal ash as a solid waste and not a hazardous waste. Site and groundwater analyses as required by the rule may identify the need to upgrade or close impoundments or the Company may need to install replacement ash management systems. The cost of replacement ash impoundments or landfills may be material. If these costs are not fully recoverable from customers, they could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
On August 15, 2014, the EPA published a rule under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, establishing requirements for water intake structures at existing steam electric generating facilities. The purpose of the rule is to reduce impingement and entrainment of fish and other aquatic organisms at cooling water intake structures. The majority of the Company's electric generating facilities are either not subject to the rule or have completed studies that project compliance expenditures are not material. The Lewis & Clark Station will complete a study that will be submitted to the Montana DEQ by July 31, 2019, to be used in determining any required controls. It is unknown at this time what controls may be required at this facility or if compliance costs will be material. The installation schedule for any required controls would be established with the permitting agency after the study is completed.
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 25



Part I

Initiatives related to global climate change and to reduce GHG emissions could adversely impact the Company's operations.operation, costs of or access to capital and impact or limit business plans.
Concern that GHG emissions are contributing to global climate change has led to international, federal, state and statelocal legislative and regulatory proposals to reduce or mitigate the effects of GHG emissions. The Company’s primary GHG emission is carbon dioxide from fossil fuels combustion at Montana-Dakota's electric generating facilities, particularly its coal-fired facilities. Approximately 5046 percent of Montana-Dakota's owned generating capacity and approximately 7673 percent of the electricity it generated in 20172019 was from coal-fired facilities.
On October 23, 2015, the EPA published the Clean Power Plan rule that requires existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating facilities to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. On February 9, 2016, however, the United States Supreme Court granted an application for a stay of the Clean Power Plan pending disposition of the applicants' petition for review in the D.C. Circuit Court and disposition of the applicants' petition for a writ of certiorari if such a writ is sought. The EPA filed a motion with the D.C. Circuit Court on March 28, 2017, requesting the Clean Power Plan's case be held in abeyance. The D.C. Circuit Court granted the EPA’s motion to hold the case in abeyance for 60 days. On August 8, 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court issued an order holding the case in abeyance for an additional 60-day period and directed the EPA to file status reports at 30-day intervals. In parallel, the EPA published a proposal on October 16, 2017, to repeal the Clean Power Plan in its entirety and followed with an advance notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on December 28, 2017, requesting comment on replacing the Clean Power Plan through new rulemaking. Compliance costs will become clearer as the EPA completes new rulemaking.
On January 14, 2015, the federal government of the United States announced a goal to reduce methane emissions from the oil and natural gas industry by 40 percent to 45 percent below 2012 levels by 2025. On June 3, 2016, the EPA published a rule updating new source performance standards for the oil and natural gas industry. The rule builds on 2012 requirements to reduce volatile organic compound emissions from oil and natural gas sources by establishing requirements to reduce methane emissions from previously regulated sources, as well as adding volatile organic compound and methane requirements for sources previously not covered by the rule. The rule impacts new and modified natural gas gathering and boosting stations and transmission and storage compressor stations. WBI Energy is currently complying with the rules impacting new and modified sources. In addition, on March 10, 2016, the EPA announced plans to reduce emissions from the oil and natural gas industry by moving to regulate emissions from existing sources. On November 10, 2016, the EPA issued an Information Collection Request to oil and gas facility operators, including WBI Energy, to begin the process of existing source rule development. On March 7, 2017, the EPA published notice of withdrawal of the Information Collection Request.
On September 15, 2016, the Washington DOE issued a Clean Air rule that requires carbon dioxide emission reductions from various industries in the state, including emissions from the combustion of natural gas supplied to end-use customers by natural gas distribution companies, such as Cascade. In 2017, the rule requires Cascade to hold carbon dioxide emissions to a baseline, equal to the average emissions in 2012 to 2016. Beginning in 2018, annual carbon dioxide emissions are reduced by an additional 1.7 percent of the baseline from the previous year's emissions. Compliance for natural gas suppliers is to be achieved through purchasing emissions credits from projects located within the state of Washington and, to a limited and declining extent, out-of-state allowances. Purchasing emissions credits and allowances will increase operating costs for Cascade. If Cascade is not able to receive timely and full recovery of compliance costs from its customers, such costs could adversely impact the results of its operations. On September 27, 2016 and September 30, 2016, Cascade

24 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

and three other natural gas distribution utility companies jointly filed complaints in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington and the Thurston County Superior Court, respectively, asking the courts to deem the rule invalid. The companies asserted that the Washington DOE undertook this rulemaking without the requisite statutory authority. On December 15, 2017, the Thurston County Superior Court vacated the Clean Air rule holding that it is invalid due to a lack of legislative approval to adopt the rule. The ruling may still be appealed by the Washington DOE or interveners. Litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington remains in abeyance pending evaluation of the recent ruling in the Thurston County Superior Court.
Additional treaties,Treaties, legislation or regulations to reduce GHG emissions in response to climate change may be adopted that affect the Company's utility operations by requiring additional energy conservation efforts or renewable energy sources, limiting emissions, imposing carbon taxes or other compliance costs; as well as other mandates that could significantly increase capital expenditures and operating costs or reduce demand for the Company's utility services. If the Company’s utility operations do not receive timely and full recovery of GHG emission compliance costs from customers, then such costs could adversely impact the results of its operations and cash flows. Significant reductions in demand for the Company's utility services as a result of increased costs or emissions limitations could also adversely impact the results of its operations and cash flows.
The Company monitors, analyzes and reports GHG emissions from its other operations as required by applicable laws and regulations. The Company will continue to monitor GHG regulations and their potential impact on operations.
Due to the uncertain availability of technologies to control GHG emissions and the unknown obligations that potential GHG emission legislation or regulations may create, the Company cannot determine the potential financial impact on its operations.
There have also been recent efforts to influence the investment community to discourage investment in equity and debt securities of companies engaged in fossil fuel related business and pressuring lenders to limit funding to such companies. Additionally, some insurance carriers have indicated an unwillingness to insure assets and operations related to certain fossil fuels. Although the Company has not experienced difficulties in accessing the capital markets or insurance; such efforts, if successfully directed at the Company, could increase the costs of or access to capital and interfere with its business operations and ability to make capital expenditures.
Other Risks
The Company's various businesses are seasonal and subject to weather conditions that can adversely affect the Company's operations, revenues and cash flows.
The Company's results of operations can be affected by changes in the weather. Weather conditions influence the demand for electricity and natural gas and affect the price of energy commodities. Utility operations have historically generated lower revenues when weather conditions are cooler than normal in the summer and warmer than normal in the winter particularly in jurisdictions that do not have decouplingweather normalization mechanisms in place. Where decoupling mechanismweather normalization mechanisms are in place, there is no assurance the Company will continue to receive such regulatory protection from adverse weather in future rates.
Adverse weather conditions, such as heavy or sustained rainfall or snowfall, storms, wind, and colder weather may affect the demand for products and the ability to perform services at the construction businesses and affect ongoing operation and maintenance and construction activities for the electric and natural gas transmission and distribution businesses. In addition, severe weather can be destructive, causing outages, and/or property damage, which could require additional costsremediation costs. The Company could also be impacted by drought conditions, which may restrict the availability of water supplies and inhibit the ability of the construction businesses to be incurred.
conduct operations. As a result, unusually mild winters or summers or adverse weather conditions could negatively affect the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Competition exists in all of the Company's businesses.
The Company's businesses are subject to competition. Construction services' competition is based primarily on price and reputation for quality, safety and reliability. Construction materials products are marketed under highly competitive conditions and are subject to such competitive forces such as price, service, delivery time and proximity to the customer. The electric utility and natural gas industries also experience competitive pressures as a result of consumer demands, technological advances and other factors. The pipeline and midstream business competes with several pipelines for access to natural gas supplies and for gathering, transportation and storage business. CompetitionNew acquisition opportunities are subject to competitive bidding environments which impact prices the Company must pay to successfully acquire new properties to grow its business. The Company's failure to effectively compete could negatively affect the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

26 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

The Company's inabilityoperations may be negatively affected if it is unable to obtain, develop and retain key personnel and skilled labor forces may have a negative effect on the Company's operations.forces.
The Company must attract, develop and retain executive officers and other professional, technical and skilled labor forces with the skills and experience necessary to successfully manage, operate and grow the Company's businesses. Competition for these employees is high, and in some cases competition for these employees is on a regional or national basis. At times of low unemployment, it can be difficult for the Company to attract and retain qualified and affordable personnel. A shortage in the supply of these skilled personnel creates competitive hiring markets, and increased labor expenses, decreased productivity and potentially lost business opportunities.opportunities to support the Company's operating and growth strategies. Additionally, if the Company is unable to hire employees with the requisite skills, the Company may also be forced to incur significant training expenses. As a result, the Company's ability to maintain productivity, relationships with customers, competitive costs, and quality services is limited by the ability to employ, retain and train the necessary skilled personnel and could negatively affect the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 25



Part I

The Company's construction materials and contracting and construction services businesses may be exposed to warranty claims.
The Company, particularly its construction businesses, may provide warranties guaranteeing the work performed against defects in workmanship and material. If warranty claims occur, they may require the Company to re-perform the services or to repair or replace the warranted item, at a cost to the Company and could also result in other damages if the Company is not able to adequately satisfy warranty obligations. In addition, the Company may be required under contractual arrangements with customers to warrant any defects or failures in materials the Company purchased from third parties. While the Company generally requires suppliers to provide warranties that are consistent with those the Company provides to customers, if any of the suppliers default on their warranty obligations to the Company, the Company may nonetheless incur costs to repair or replace the defective materials. Costs incurred as a result of warranty claims could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The Company could be subject to limitationsis a holding company and relies on cash from its abilitysubsidiaries to pay dividends.
The Company is a holding company as a result of the Holding Company Reorganization in 2019. The Company's investments in its subsidiaries comprise the Company's primary assets. The Company depends on earnings, from its divisionscash flows and dividends from its subsidiaries to pay dividends on its common stock. The Company's subsidiaries are separate legal entities that have no obligation to pay any amounts due on its obligations or to make funds available to pay dividends on common stock. Regulatory, contractual and legal limitations, as well as their capital requirements, affect the ability of the subsidiaries to pay dividends to the Company and the Company's financial performance or cash flows,thereby could restrict or influence the Company's ability or decision to pay dividends on its common stock, andwhich could adversely affect the Company's stock price.
Costs related to obligations under MEPPs could have a material negative effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
Various operating subsidiaries of the Company participate in approximately 75 MEPPs for employees represented by certain unions. The Company is required to make contributions to these plans in amounts established under numerous collective bargaining agreements between the operating subsidiaries and those unions.
The Company may be obligated to increase its contributions to underfunded plans that are classified as being in endangered, seriously endangered or critical status as defined by the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Plans classified as being in one of these statuses are required to adopt RPs or FIPs to improve their funded status through increased contributions, reduced benefits or a combination of the two. Based on available information, the Company believes that approximately 3525 percent of the MEPPs to which it contributes are currently in endangered, seriously endangered or critical status.
The Company may also be required to increase its contributions to MEPPs if the other participating employers in such plans withdraw from the plans and are not able to contribute amounts sufficient to fund the unfunded liabilities associated with their participation in the plans. The amount and timing of any increase in the Company's required contributions to MEPPs may also depend upon one or more factors including the outcome of collective bargaining,bargaining; actions taken by trustees who manage the plans,plans; actions taken by the plans' other participating employers,employers; the industry for which contributions are made,made; future determinations that additional plans reach endangered, seriously endangered or critical status,status; newly-enacted government laws or regulations and the actual return on assets held in the plans,plans; among others. The Company maycould experience increased operating expenses as a result of the required contributions to MEPPs, which maycould have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In addition, pursuant to ERISA, as amended by MPPAA, the Company could incur a partial or complete withdrawal liability upon withdrawing from a plan, exiting a market in which it does business with a union workforce or upon termination of a plan to the extent these plans are underfunded.plan. The Company could also incur additional withdrawal liability if its withdrawal from a plan is determined by that plan to be part of a mass withdrawal.
Information technology disruptions or cyberattacks could adversely impact the Company's operations.
The Company'sCompany uses technology in substantially all aspects of its business operations requireand requires uninterrupted operation of information technology systems and network infrastructure. While the Company has policies, procedures and processes in place designed to strengthen and protect these systems, they may be vulnerable to failures or unauthorized access, including disaster recovery and backup systems, due to hacking, human error, theft, sabotage, malicious software, acts of terrorism, acts of war, acts of nature or other causes. If these systems

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 27



Part I

fail or become comprised,compromised, and they are not recovered in a timely manner, the Company may be unable to fulfill critical business functions. This may include interruption of electric generation, transmission and distribution facilities, natural gas storage and pipeline facilities and facilities for delivery of construction materials or other products and services. services, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's reputation, business, cash flows and results of operations or subject the Company to legal or regulatory liabilities and increased costs.
The Company’s accounting systems and its ability to collect information and invoice customers for products and services could also be disrupted. If the Company’s operations were disrupted, it could result in decreased revenues or significant remediation costs that could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, because electric generation and transmission systems and natural gas pipelines are part of interconnected systems with other operators’ facilities, a cyber-related disruption in another operator’s system could negatively impact the Company's business.

The Company is subject to cyber security and privacy laws and regulations of many government agencies, including FERC and NERC. NERC issues comprehensive regulations and standards surrounding the security of bulk power systems and is continually in the process of updating these requirements, as well as establishing new requirements with which the utility industry must comply. As these regulations evolve, the Company will experience increased compliance costs and be at higher risk for violating these standards. Experiencing a cybersecurity incident could cause the Company to be non-compliant with applicable laws and regulations, causing the Company to incur costs related to legal claims or proceedings and regulatory fines or penalties. FERC continues its efforts to address cybersecurity challenges facing the nation's energy infrastructure. FERC has identified five areas of focus:
Supply Chain/Insider Threat/Third-Party Authorized Access;
26 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-KIndustry access to timely information on threats and vulnerabilities;



Cloud/Managed Security Service Providers;
Part IAdequacy of security controls; and

Internal network monitoring and detection.
The Company, through the ordinary course of business, requires access to sensitive customer, employee and Company data. While the Company has implemented extensive security measures, a breach of its systems could compromise sensitive data.data and could go unnoticed for some time. In addition, there has been an increase in the number and sophistication of cyber-attacks across all industries worldwide and the threats are continually evolving. Such an event could result in negative publicity and reputational harm, remediation costs, legal claims and fines that could have an adverse effect on the Company's financial results. Third-party service providers that perform critical business functions for the Company or have access to sensitive information within the Company also may be vulnerable to security breaches and information technology risks that could have an adverse effect on the Company.
The Company’s information systems experience on-going and often sophisticated cyber-attacks by a variety of sources with the apparent aim to breach the Company's cyber-defenses. As cyber-attacks continue to increase in frequency and sophistication, the Company may be subjectunable to potential material liabilities relating toprevent all such attacks in the past sale of assets or businesses, primarily arising from events prior to sale.
future. The Company previously sold its oilis continuously reevaluating the need to upgrade and/or replace systems and natural gas assetsnetwork infrastructure. These upgrades and/or replacements could adversely impact operations by imposing substantial capital expenditures, creating delays or outages, or experiencing difficulties transitioning to new systems. Systems implementation disruption and its membership interests in Dakota Prairie Refining. The Company may be subject to potential liabilities, either directly or through indemnification ofany other information technology disruption, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated, could have an adverse effect on the buyers or others, relating to these transactions or other sales, primarily arising from events prior to the sale, or from breaches of any representations, warranties or covenants in the purchase and sale agreements.Company.
Other factors that could impact the Company's businesses.
The following are other factors that should be considered for a better understanding of the risks to the Company. These other factors may have a materially negativelynegative impact on the Company's financial results in future periods.
Acquisition, disposal and impairments of assets or facilitiesfacilities.
Changes in operation, performance and construction of plant facilities or other assetsassets.
Changes in present or prospective generationgeneration.
The availability of economic expansion or development opportunitiesopportunities.
Population growth ratesdecline and demographic patternspatterns.
Economic and social impacts of epidemics.
Market demand for, available supplies of, and/or costs of, energy- and construction-related products and servicesservices.
The cyclical nature of large construction projects at certain operationsoperations.
Unanticipated project delays or changes in project costs, including related energy costscosts.
Unanticipated changes in operating expenses or capital expendituresexpenditures.
Labor negotiations or disputesdisputes.

28 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part I

Inability of the contract counterparties to meet their contractual obligationsobligations.
Changes in accounting principles and/or the application of such principles to the CompanyCompany.
Changes in technologytechnology.
Changes in legal or regulatory proceedingsproceedings.
Losses or costs relating to litigationlitigation.
The abilityinability to effectively integrate the operations and the internal controls of acquired companiescompanies.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
The Company has no unresolved comments with the SEC.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding legal proceedings required by this item, see Item 8 - Note 17,20, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
For information regarding mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, see Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 2729



Part II
 


Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company's common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "MDU." The price range of the Company's common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange during 2017 and 2016 and dividends declared thereon were as follows:
 
Common
Stock Price
(High)

Common
Stock Price
(Low)

Common Stock Dividends
Declared
Per Share

2017   
First quarter
$29.74

$25.83

$.1925
Second quarter27.89
25.58
.1925
Third quarter27.73
25.14
.1925
Fourth quarter28.22
25.89
.1975
   
$.7750
2016   
First quarter
$19.55

$15.57

$.1875
Second quarter24.01
18.70
.1875
Third quarter25.79
22.47
.1875
Fourth quarter29.92
24.49
.1925
   
$.7550
As of December 31, 20172019, the Company's common stock was held by approximately 11,70310,700 stockholders of record.
The Company depends on earnings from its divisions and dividends from its subsidiaries to pay dividends on common stock. The Company has paid quarterly dividends for more than 80 consecutive years with an increase in the payout amount for the last 29 consecutive years. The declaration and payment of dividends is at the sole discretion of the board of directors, subject to limitations imposed by the Company's credit agreements, federal and state laws, and applicable regulatory limitations. For more information on factors that may limit the Company's ability to pay dividends, see Item 8 - Note 9.12.
The following table includes information with respect to the Company's purchase of equity securities:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period
(a)
Total Number
of Shares
(or Units)
Purchased (1)

(b) 
Average Price Paid per Share
(or Unit)

(c)
Total Number of Shares
(or Units) Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs (2)

(d)
Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares (or
Units) that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs (2)

October 1 through October 31, 2017



November 1 through November 30, 201738,121
$26.88

December 1 through December 31, 20172,451
$27.70

Total40,572
 

Period
(a)
Total Number
of Shares
(or Units)
Purchased (1)

(b) 
Average Price Paid per Share
(or Unit)

(c)
Total Number of Shares
(or Units) Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs (2)

(d)
Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares (or
Units) that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs (2)

October 1 through October 31, 2019



November 1 through November 30, 201941,644
$29.16

December 1 through December 31, 2019



Total41,644
 

(1)Represents shares of common stock purchased on the open market in connection with annual stock grants made to the Company's non-employee directors and for those directors who elected to receive additional shares of common stock in lieu of a portion of their cash retainer.directors.
(2)Not applicable. The Company does not currently have in place any publicly announced plans or programs to purchase equity securities.
 

 
2830 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Selected Financial Data  
Operating revenues (000's):  
Electric$342,805
$322,356
$280,615
$277,874
$257,260
$236,895
$351,725
$335,123
$342,805
$322,356
$280,615
$277,874
Natural gas distribution848,388
766,115
817,419
921,986
851,945
754,848
865,222
823,247
848,388
766,115
817,419
921,986
Pipeline and midstream122,213
141,602
154,904
157,292
144,568
142,610
140,444
128,923
122,213
141,602
154,904
157,292
Construction materials and contracting1,812,529
1,874,270
1,904,282
1,765,330
1,712,137
1,617,425
2,190,717
1,925,854
1,812,529
1,874,270
1,904,282
1,765,330
Construction services1,367,602
1,073,272
926,427
1,119,529
1,039,839
938,558
1,849,266
1,371,453
1,367,602
1,073,272
926,427
1,119,529
Other7,874
8,643
9,191
9,364
9,620
10,370
16,551
11,259
7,874
8,643
9,191
9,364
Intersegment eliminations(58,060)(57,430)(78,786)(136,302)(95,201)(74,595)(77,149)(64,307)(58,060)(57,430)(78,786)(136,302)
$4,443,351
$4,128,828
$4,014,052
$4,115,073
$3,920,168
$3,626,111
$5,336,776
$4,531,552
$4,443,351
$4,128,828
$4,014,052
$4,115,073
Operating income (loss) (000's): 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Electric$82,153
$68,497
$57,955
$61,331
$54,274
$49,852
$64,039
$65,148
$79,902
$67,929
$59,915
$61,515
Natural gas distribution84,878
65,014
53,810
65,633
78,829
67,579
69,188
72,336
84,239
66,166
54,974
68,185
Pipeline and midstream36,924
43,374
29,988
46,713
20,896
49,139
42,796
36,128
36,004
42,864
30,218
46,500
Construction materials and contracting143,716
178,719
146,026
86,462
93,629
57,864
179,955
141,426
143,230
178,753
148,312
87,243
Construction services81,590
53,705
43,376
82,309
85,246
66,531
126,426
86,764
81,292
53,546
43,678
82,408
Other(549)(189)(8,438)(5,366)(4,384)(5,325)(1,184)(79)(619)(349)(8,414)(5,370)
Intersegment eliminations

(2,942)(9,900)(7,176)




(2,942)(9,900)
$428,712
$409,120
$319,775
$327,182
$321,314
$285,640
$481,220
$401,723
$424,048
$408,909
$325,741
$330,581
Earnings (loss) on common stock (000's):  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Electric$49,366
$42,222
$35,914
$36,731
$34,837
$30,634
$54,763
$47,000
$49,366
$42,222
$35,914
$36,731
Natural gas distribution32,225
27,102
23,607
30,484
37,656
29,409
39,517
37,732
32,225
27,102
23,607
30,484
Pipeline and midstream20,493
23,435
13,250
24,666
7,701
26,588
29,603
28,459
20,493
23,435
13,250
24,666
Construction materials and contracting123,398
102,687
89,096
51,510
50,946
32,420
120,371
92,647
123,398
102,687
89,096
51,510
Construction services53,306
33,945
23,762
54,432
52,213
38,429
92,998
64,309
53,306
33,945
23,762
54,432
Other(1,422)(3,231)(14,941)(7,386)(10,776)(7,209)(2,086)(761)(1,422)(3,231)(14,941)(7,386)
Intersegment eliminations6,849
6,251
5,016
(6,095)(4,307)


6,849
6,251
5,016
(6,095)
Earnings on common stock before income (loss) from discontinued operations284,215
232,411
175,704
184,342
168,270
150,271
335,166
269,386
284,215
232,411
175,704
184,342
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax*(3,783)(300,354)(834,080)109,311
109,615
(151,710)287
2,932
(3,783)(300,354)(834,080)109,311
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
(131,691)(35,256)(3,895)(363)



(131,691)(35,256)(3,895)
$280,432
$63,748
$(623,120)$297,548
$278,248
$(1,439)$335,453
$272,318
$280,432
$63,748
$(623,120)$297,548
Earnings (loss) per common share before discontinued operations - diluted$1.45
$1.19
$.90
$.96
$.89
$.80
Earnings per common share before discontinued operations - diluted$1.69
$1.38
$1.45
$1.19
$.90
$.96
Discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax(.02)(.86)(4.10).59
.58
(.81)
.01
(.02)(.86)(4.10).59
$1.43
$.33
$(3.20)$1.55
$1.47
$(.01)$1.69
$1.39
$1.43
$.33
$(3.20)$1.55
Common Stock Statistics  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding -diluted (000's)195,687
195,618
194,986
192,587
189,693
188,826
198,626
196,150
195,687
195,618
194,986
192,587
Dividends declared per common share$.7750
$.7550
$.7350
$.7150
$.6950
$.6750
$.8150
$.7950
$.7750
$.7550
$.7350
$.7150
Book value per common share$12.44
$11.78
$12.83
$16.66
$15.01
$13.95
$14.21
$13.09
$12.44
$11.78
$12.83
$16.66
Market price per common share (year end)$26.88
$28.77
$18.32
$23.50
$30.55
$21.24
$29.71
$23.84
$26.88
$28.77
$18.32
$23.50
Market price ratios:  
 
 
  
 
 
Dividend payout**53%63%82%74%78%84%48%58%53%63%82%74%
Yield2.9%2.7%4.1%3.1%2.3%3.2%2.8%3.4%2.9%2.7%4.1%3.1%
Market value as a percent of book value216.1%244.2%142.8%141.1%203.5%152.3%209.1%182.1%216.1%244.2%142.8%141.1%
*Reflects oil and natural gas properties noncash write-downs of $315.3 million (after tax) and $246.8 million (after tax) in 2015 and 2012, respectively, and fair value impairments of assets held for sale of $157.8 million (after tax) and $475.4 million (after tax) in 2016 and 2015, respectively.
**Based on continuing operations.
 

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 2931



Part II
 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data (continued)
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
General  
Total assets (000's)$6,334,666
$6,284,467
$6,565,154
$7,805,405
$7,043,365
$6,675,609
$7,683,059
$6,988,110
$6,334,666
$6,284,467
$6,565,154
$7,805,405
Total long-term debt (000's)$1,714,853
$1,790,159
$1,796,163
$2,016,198
$1,773,050
$1,738,833
$2,243,107
$2,108,695
$1,714,853
$1,790,159
$1,796,163
$2,016,198
Capitalization ratios: 

  
Total equity59%56%58%62%62%60%56%55%59%56%58%62%
Total debt41
44
42
38
38
40
44
45
41
44
42
38
100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
Electric    
Retail sales (thousand kWh)3,306,470
3,258,537
3,316,017
3,308,358
3,173,086
2,996,528
3,314,307
3,354,401
3,306,470
3,258,537
3,316,017
3,308,358
Electric system summer and firm purchase contract ZRCs (Interconnected system)553.1
559.7
547.3
584.0
583.5
552.8
591.3
574.5
553.1
559.7
547.3
584.0
Electric system peak demand obligation, including firm purchase contracts, planning reserve margin requirement (Interconnected system)530.2
559.7
547.3
522.4
508.3
550.7
537.2
537.2
530.2
559.7
547.3
522.4
All-time demand peak - kW (Interconnected system)611,542
611,542
611,542
582,083
573,587
573,587
611,542
611,542
611,542
611,542
611,542
582,083
Electricity produced (thousand kWh)2,630,640
2,626,763
1,898,160
2,519,938
2,430,001
2,299,686
2,792,770
2,840,353
2,630,640
2,626,763
1,898,160
2,519,938
Electricity purchased (thousand kWh)955,687
904,702
1,658,002
1,010,422
971,261
870,516
891,539
831,039
955,687
904,702
1,658,002
1,010,422
Average cost of electric fuel and purchased power per kWh$.022
$.021
$.024
$.025
$.025
$.023
$.023
$.022
$.022
$.021
$.024
$.025
Natural Gas Distribution  
 
 
  
 
 
Sales (Mdk)112,551
99,296
95,559
104,297
108,260
93,810
Transportation (Mdk)144,477
147,592
154,225
145,941
149,490
132,010
Degree days (% of normal)  
 
 
Montana-Dakota/Great Plains100%89%88%103%105%84%
Cascade107%87%83%89%98%96%
Intermountain111%96%89%95%110%91%
Retail sales (Mdk)123,675
112,566
112,551
99,296
95,559
104,297
Transportation sales (Mdk)166,077
149,497
144,477
147,592
154,225
145,941
Pipeline and Midstream  
 
 
  
 
 
Transportation (Mdk)312,520
285,254
290,494
233,483
178,598
137,720
429,660
351,498
312,520
285,254
290,494
233,483
Gathering (Mdk)16,064
20,049
33,441
38,372
40,737
47,084
13,900
14,882
16,064
20,049
33,441
38,372
Customer natural gas storage balance (Mdk)22,397
26,403
16,600
14,885
26,693
43,731
16,223
13,928
22,397
26,403
16,600
14,885
Construction Materials and Contracting  
 
 
  
 
 
Sales (000's):  
Aggregates (tons)28,213
27,580
26,959
25,827
24,713
23,285
32,314
29,795
28,213
27,580
26,959
25,827
Asphalt (tons)6,237
7,203
6,705
6,070
6,228
5,988
6,707
6,838
6,237
7,203
6,705
6,070
Ready-mixed concrete (cubic yards)3,548
3,655
3,592
3,460
3,223
3,157
4,123
3,518
3,548
3,655
3,592
3,460
Aggregate reserves (000's tons)965,036
989,084
1,022,513
1,061,156
1,083,376
1,088,236
1,054,186
1,014,431
965,036
989,084
1,022,513
1,061,156


 
3032 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
On January 2, 2019, the Company announced the completion of the Holding Company Reorganization, which resulted in Montana-Dakota becoming a subsidiary of the Company. The merger was conducted pursuant to Section 251(g) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which provides for the formation of a holding company without a vote of the stockholders of the constituent corporation. Immediately after consummation of the Holding Company Reorganization, the Company had, on a consolidated basis, the same assets, businesses and operations as Montana-Dakota had immediately prior to the consummation of the Holding Company Reorganization. As a result of the Holding Company Reorganization, the Company became the successor issuer to Montana-Dakota pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) of the Exchange Act, and as a result, the Company's common stock was deemed registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act.
The Company operates with a two-platform business model. Its regulated energy delivery platform and its construction materials and services platform are each comprised of different operating segments. Some of these segments experience seasonality related to the industries in which they operate. The two-platform approach helps balance this seasonality and the risk associated with each type of industry. Through its regulated energy delivery platform, the Company provides electric and natural gas services to customers, generates, transmits and distributes electricity, and provides natural gas transportation, storage and gathering services. These businesses are regulated by state public service commissions and/or the FERC. The construction materials and services platform provides construction services to a variety of industries, including commercial, industrial and governmental, and provides construction materials through aggregate mining and marketing of related products, such as ready-mixed concrete and asphalt.
The Company is organized into five reportable business segments. These business segments include: electric, natural gas distribution, pipeline and midstream, construction materials and contracting, and construction services. The Company's business segments are determined based on the Company's method of internal reporting, which generally segregates the strategic business units due to differences in products, services and regulation. The internal reporting of these segments is defined based on the reporting and review process used by the Company's chief executive officer.
The Company's strategy is to apply its expertise in the regulated energy delivery and construction materials and services businesses to increase market share, increase profitability and enhance shareholder value through organic growth opportunities and strategic acquisitions. The Company is focused on a disciplined approach to the acquisition of well-managed companies and properties.
The Company has capabilities to fund its growth and operations through various sources, including internally generated funds, commercial paper facilities, revolving credit facilities and the issuance from time to time of debt and equity securities. For more information on the Company's capital expenditures, see Liquidity and Capital Commitments.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the TCJA making significant changes to the United States federal income tax laws. Some of the more material changes from the TCJA impacting the Company includes lower corporate tax rates, repealing the domestic production deduction, disallowance of immediate expensing for regulated utility property and modifying or repealing many other business deductions and credits. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company performed a one-time revaluation of the net deferred tax liabilities to account for the reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 11. The Company is currently reviewing the components of the TCJA and evaluating the impact on the Company for 2018 and thereafter. For information pertinent to the specific impacts or trends identified by the Company's business segments, see Business Segment Financial and Operating Data.
Consolidated Earnings Overview
The following table summarizes the contribution to the consolidated earnings (loss) by each of the Company's business segments.
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
 (In millions, except per share amounts)
Electric$49.4
$42.2
$35.9
Natural gas distribution32.2
27.1
23.6
Pipeline and midstream20.5
23.4
13.3
Construction materials and contracting123.4
102.7
89.1
Construction services53.3
33.9
23.8
Other(1.5)(3.2)(15.0)
Intersegment eliminations6.9
6.3
5.0
Earnings before discontinued operations284.2
232.4
175.7
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(3.8)(300.4)(834.1)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
(131.7)(35.3)
Earnings (loss) on common stock$280.4
$63.7
$(623.1)
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic:   
Earnings before discontinued operations$1.46
$1.19
$.90
Discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax(.02)(.86)(4.10)
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic$1.44
$.33
$(3.20)
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted:   
Earnings before discontinued operations$1.45
$1.19
$.90
Discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax(.02)(.86)(4.10)
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted$1.43
$.33
$(3.20)
2017 compared to 2016 The Company recognized consolidated earnings of $280.4 million in 2017, compared to consolidated earnings of $63.7 million in 2016. This increase was the result of:
Discontinued operations which reflect the absence in 2017 of a loss associated with the sale of the refining business in June 2016
An income tax benefit of $39.5 million primarily for the revaluation of the Company's net deferred tax liabilities, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 11
Higher inside and outside specialty contracting margins at the construction services business
Higher natural gas retail sales margins at the natural gas distribution business
Higher electric retail sales margins at the electric business
These increases were partially offset by:
Lower asphalt product margins and lower construction margins at the construction materials and contracting business
Years ended December 31,2019
2018
2017
 (In millions, except per share amounts)
Electric$54.8
$47.0
$49.4
Natural gas distribution39.5
37.7
32.2
Pipeline and midstream29.6
28.5
20.5
Construction materials and contracting120.4
92.6
123.4
Construction services93.0
64.3
53.3
Other(2.1)(.7)(1.5)
Intersegment eliminations

6.9
Earnings before discontinued operations335.2
269.4
284.2
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax.3
2.9
(3.8)
Earnings on common stock$335.5
$272.3
$280.4
Earnings per common share - basic:   
Earnings before discontinued operations$1.69
$1.38
$1.46
Discontinued operations, net of tax
.01
(.02)
Earnings per common share - basic$1.69
$1.39
$1.44
Earnings per common share - diluted:   
Earnings before discontinued operations$1.69
$1.38
$1.45
Discontinued operations, net of tax
.01
(.02)
Earnings per common share - diluted$1.69
$1.39
$1.43

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 3133



Part II
 

Lower gathering and processing revenues2019 compared to 2018 The Company's consolidated earnings increased $63.2 million.
Positively impacting the Company's earnings was an increase in gross margin at the pipelineconstruction services business, largely resulting from higher inside and midstream business
2016 comparedoutside specialty contracting workloads. Also contributing to 2015 The Company recognized consolidatedthe increase in earnings of $63.7 millionwas an increase in 2016, compared to a consolidated loss of $623.1 million in 2015. This increase was due to:
Discontinued operations which reflect the absence in 2016 of fair value impairments of the exploration and production business's assets of $475.4 million (after tax) and a noncash write-down of oil and natural gas properties of $315.3 million (after tax) offset in part by a fair value impairment of the refining business of $156.7 million (after tax) in 2016
Higher construction, asphalt product and aggregate marginsgross margin at the construction materials and contracting business
Other loss decreased primarily as thea result of lower operationstrong economic environments in certain states, as well as contributions from the businesses acquired and maintenance and interest expensean increase in gains recognized on asset sales. The electric business also positively impacted earnings primarily due to the salesapproved rate relief in Montana and recovery of the exploration and production and refining businesses
investment in the BSSE project placed into service in the first quarter of 2019. Higher inside construction margins offset in part by lower outside construction margins, which includes lower equipment sales and rental margins, atreturns on the construction services business
Lower impairment in 2016 atCompany's benefit plan investments also increased earnings across all businesses. At the pipeline and midstream business,
Higher electric retail sales margins increased rates and volumes of natural gas being transported through its pipeline were mostly offset by the absence of a $4.2 million income tax benefit included in part by higher operation and maintenance expense2018, as discussed below, and higher depreciation, depletion and amortization expenseexpense.
2018 compared to 2017 The Company's consolidated earnings decreased $8.1 million.
The Company's earnings were positively impacted in 2018 as a result of the lower federal statutory tax rate, which was partially offset by the absence of a $39.5 million tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 for the revaluation of the business's net deferred tax liabilities. Both tax impacts were the result of the enactment of the TCJA, as further discussed in Item 8 - Note 14. Decreased earnings due to lower returns on investments also offset the lower income tax rate. Also positively impacting the Company's earnings were higher outside specialty contracting gross margins due to increased outside equipment sales and rentals at the electricconstruction services business, as well as a $4.2 million income tax benefit relating to the reversal of a regulatory liability recorded in 2017 based on a FERC final accounting order issued during the third quarter of 2018 at the pipeline and midstream business.
A discussion of key financial data from the Company's business segments follows.
Business Segment Financial and Operating Data
Following are key financial and operating data for each of the Company's business segments. Also included are highlights on key growth strategies, projections and certain assumptions for the Company and its subsidiaries and other matters of the Company's business segments. Many of these highlighted points are "forward-looking statements." For more information, see Part I - Forward-Looking Statements. There is no assurance that the Company's projections, including estimates for growth and changes in earnings, will in fact be achieved. Please refer to assumptions contained in this section, as well as the various important factors listed in Item 1A - Risk Factors. Changes in such assumptions and factors could cause actual future results to differ materially from the Company's growth and earnings projections.
For information pertinent to various commitments and contingencies, see Item 8 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For a summary of the Company's business segments, see Item 8 - Note 13.16.
Electric and Natural Gas Distribution
Strategy and challenges The electric and natural gas distribution segments provide electric and natural gas distribution services to customers, as discussed in Items 1 and 2 - Business Properties. Both segments strive to be a top performing utility company measured by integrity, safety, employees,employee satisfaction, customer service and shareholder performance,return, while continuing to focus on providing safe, environmentally friendly, reliable and competitively priced energy and related services to customers. The Company is focused on cultivating organic growth while managing operating costs and continues to monitor opportunities for these segments to retain, grow and expand their customer base through extensions of existing operations, including building and upgrading electric generation, transmission and transmissiondistribution and natural gas systems, and through selected acquisitions of companies and properties with similar operating and growth objectives at prices that will provide stable cash flows and an opportunity to earn a competitive return on investment. The continued efforts to create operational improvements and efficiencies across both segments promotes the Company's business integration strategy. The primary factors that impact the results of these segments are the ability to earn authorized rates of return, the cost of natural gas, cost of electric fuel and purchased power, weather, competitive factors in the energy industry, population growth and economic conditions in the segments' service areas.
The electric and natural gas distribution segments are subject to extensive regulation in the jurisdictions where they conduct operations with respect to costs, timely recovery of investments and permitted returns on investment, as well as certain operational, environmental and system integrity and environmental regulations. To assist in the reduction of regulatory lag with the increase in investments, tracking mechanisms have been implemented.implemented in certain jurisdictions, as further discussed in Items 1 and 2 - Business Properties and Item 8 - Note 19. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration recently issued additional rules to strengthen the safety of natural gas transmission and hazardous liquid pipelines. The Company is currently evaluating the first phase of the rules. Legislative and regulatory initiatives to increase renewable energy resources and reduce GHG emissions could impact the price and demand for electricity and natural gas, as well as increase costs to produce electricity and result in the retirement of certain electric generating facilities before they are fully depreciated. Although the current administration has slowed environmental regulations, thenatural gas. The segments continue to invest in facility upgrades to be in compliance with the existing and future regulations.

34 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Tariff increases on steel and aluminum materials could negatively affect the segments' construction projects and maintenance work. The Company continues to monitor the impact of tariffs on raw material costs. The natural gas distribution segment is also facing increased lead times on delivery of certain raw materials used in pipeline projects. In addition to the effect of tariffs, long lead times are attributable to increased demand for steel products from pipeline companies as they respond to the United States Department of Transportation Pipeline System Safety and Integrity Plan. The Company continues to monitor the material lead times and is working with manufacturers to proactively order such materials to help mitigate the risk of delays due to extended lead times.
The ability to grow through acquisitions is subject to significant competition and acquisition premiums. In addition, the ability of the segments to grow their service territory and customer base is affected by the economic environment of the markets served and competition from other energy providers and fuels. The construction of any new electric generating facilities, transmission lines and other service facilities is subject to increasing costcosts and lead time,times, extensive permitting procedures, and federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives, which will likely necessitate increases in electric energy prices.
Revenues are impacted by both customer growth and usage, the latter of which is primarily impacted by weather. Very cold winters increase demand for natural gas and to a lesser extent, electricity, while warmer than normal summers increase demand for electricity, especially among residential and commercial customers. Average consumption among both electric and natural gas customers has tended to decline as more efficient

32 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

appliances and furnaces are installed, and as the Company has implemented conservation programs. DecouplingNatural gas decoupling mechanisms in certain jurisdictions have been implemented to largely mitigate the effect that would otherwise be caused by variations in volumes sold to these customers due to weather and changing consumption patterns.patterns on the Company's distribution margins.
Earnings overview - electric The following information summarizes the performance of the electric segment.
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
(Dollars in millions, where applicable)(Dollars in millions, where applicable)
Operating revenues$342.8
$322.3
$280.6
$351.7
$335.1
$342.8
Electric fuel and purchased power86.6
80.7
78.7
Taxes, other than income.6
.7
.8
Adjusted gross margin264.5
253.7
263.3
Operating expenses:  
  
Operation and maintenance120.0
115.2
87.7
125.7
123.0
122.2
Electric fuel and purchased power78.7
75.5
86.2
Depreciation, depletion and amortization47.7
50.2
37.6
58.7
51.0
47.7
Taxes, other than income14.3
12.9
11.1
16.1
14.5
13.5
Total operating expenses260.7
253.8
222.6
200.5
188.5
183.4
Operating income82.1
68.5
58.0
64.0
65.2
79.9
Other income3.4
1.2
3.2
Interest expense25.3
25.9
25.4
Income before income taxes42.1
40.5
57.7
Income taxes(12.7)(6.5)7.7
Net income54.8
47.0
50.0
Loss/dividends on preferred stock

.6
Earnings$49.4
$42.2
$35.9
$54.8
$47.0
$49.4
Retail sales (million kWh):  
Residential1,153.5
1,132.5
1,173.9
1,177.9
1,196.6
1,153.5
Commercial1,513.1
1,491.8
1,499.6
1,499.9
1,513.9
1,513.1
Industrial539.9
544.2
550.3
549.4
551.0
539.9
Other100.0
90.0
92.2
87.1
92.9
100.0
3,306.5
3,258.5
3,316.0
3,314.3
3,354.4
3,306.5
Average cost of electric fuel and purchased power per kWh$.022
$.021
$.024
$.023
$.022
$.022
Adjusted gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. For additional information and reconciliation of the non-GAAP adjusted gross margin attributable to the electric segment, see the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section later in this Item.
20172019 compared to 20162018 Electric earnings increased $7.2$7.8 million (17 percent) compared to the prior year. The increase resulted from:as a result of:
Increased electric retail sales margins from the recoveryAdjusted gross margin: Increase of additional investment in a MISO multivalue project, approved rate recovery in all jurisdictions and 2 percent higher retail sales volumes to commercial and residential customers
Lower depreciation, depletion and amortization expense of $1.5$10.8 million, (after tax) from lower depreciation rates implemented in conjunction with regulatory recovery activity
Partially offsetting the increase were:
Higher operation and maintenance expense of $3.0 million (after tax) largely from higher payroll-related costs, material costs and contract services
Income tax expense of $2.1 million for the revaluation of nonutility net deferred tax assets, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 11
2016 compared to 2015Electric earnings increased $6.3 million (18 percent) compared to the prior year due to:
Increased electric retail sales margins, largely due to approved final and interim rate increases reduced in part by decreased electric sales volumes of 2 percent, largely from decreased residential customer volumes
Favorable income tax changes, which includes $10.1 million due to higher production tax credits
Partially offsetting these increases were:
Higher operation and maintenance expense of $17.1 million (after tax) primarily due to higher contract servicesan increase in revenues. The revenue increase was driven by implemented regulatory mechanisms, which include approved Montana interim and higher payroll-related costs
Higher depreciation, depletionfinal rates and amortization expense of $7.8 million (after tax) due to increased property, plant and equipment balances
Lower other income, which includes $7.1 million (after tax) primarily related to AFUDC
Higher interest expense, which includes $4.4 million (after tax) largely the result of higher long-term debt
Certainrecovery of the higher operation and maintenance expense, higher depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and higher production tax creditsinvestment in 2016, due to increased capital investments, are potentially recoverable and/or refundable through the rate recovery process. The previous table also reflects lower average cost of electric fuel and purchased power per kWh due to no electric fuel and purchased power costs associated with the Thunder Spirit Wind farm in 2016 as compared to 2015.

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 3335



Part II
 

Earnings overview - natural gas distribution The following information summarizesBSSE project placed into service in the performancefirst quarter of the natural gas distribution segment.
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
 (Dollars in millions, where applicable)
Operating revenues$848.4
$766.1
$817.4
Operating expenses:   
Operation and maintenance163.7
158.1
153.5
Purchased natural gas sold479.9
431.5
499.0
Depreciation, depletion and amortization69.4
65.4
64.8
Taxes, other than income50.5
46.1
46.3
Total operating expenses763.5
701.1
763.6
Operating income84.9
65.0
53.8
Earnings$32.2
$27.1
$23.6
Volumes (MMdk)   
Retail sales:   
Residential63.6
56.2
54.0
Commercial44.3
38.9
37.6
Industrial4.6
4.2
4.0
 112.5
99.3
95.6
Transportation sales:   
Commercial2.0
1.8
1.8
Industrial142.5
145.8
152.4
 144.5
147.6
154.2
Total throughput257.0
246.9
249.8
Degree days (% of normal)*   
Montana-Dakota/Great Plains100%89%88%
Cascade107%87%83%
Intermountain111%96%89%
Average cost of natural gas, including transportation, per dk$4.26
$4.35
$5.22
*Degree days are a measure of the daily temperature-related demand for energy for heating.
2017 compared to 2016 The natural gas distribution business experienced an increase in earnings of $5.1 million (19 percent) compared2019. Also contributing to the prior year becauseincrease was the absence in 2019 of increased natural gas retail sales margins. The margin increase resulted from:
Increaseda transmission formula rate adjustment recognized in the third quarter of 2018 for decreased costs on the BSSE project. These increases were partially offset by lower retail sales volumes of 131.2 percent across all major customer classes from colder weather in all jurisdictions, offset in part by weather normalization in certain jurisdictions,classes.
Operation and 2 percent customer growth
Approved final and interim rate increases
Partially offsetting the increase were:
Income tax expense of $4.3 million for the revaluation of nonutility net deferred tax assets, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 11
Higher operation and maintenance expense, which includes $3.7maintenance: Increase of $2.7 million, (after tax) largelyprimarily resulting from higher payroll-related costs, andpartially offset by lower material costsexpenses across all locations.
Higher depreciation,Depreciation, depletion and amortization expenseamortization: Increase of $2.4$7.7 million (after tax) as a result of increased property, plant and equipment balances including the BSSE project, as previously discussed, and other capital projects, as well as a reserve for certain costs related to the retirement of three aging coal-fired electric generating units, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 7, which is offset in income taxes.
2016Taxes, other than income: Increase of $1.6 million, primarily from higher property taxes in certain jurisdictions.
Other income: Increase of $2.2 million, largely the result of higher returns on the Company's benefit plan investments, partially offset by the write-down of a non-utility investment, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 8.
Interest expense: Decrease of $600,000 driven by higher AFUDC, which resulted in more interest being capitalized on regulated construction projects.
Income taxes: Increase in income tax benefits of $6.2 million, largely due to increased production tax credits, as well as increased excess deferred tax amortization.
2018 compared to 20152017 The natural gas distribution business experienced an increaseElectric earnings decreased $2.4 million (5 percent) as a result of:
Adjusted gross margin: Decrease of $9.6 million, primarily due to lower operating revenues driven by the reserves against revenues in earnings of $3.5 million (15 percent) comparedcertain jurisdictions for anticipated refunds to customers for lower income taxes due to the enactment of TCJA and a transmission formula rate adjustment due to lower than anticipated project costs on the BSSE project recorded in the third quarter of 2018. Partially offsetting the decreases to adjusted gross margin were the absence in 2018 of reserves related to tracker balances in prior year from higher natural gas retail sales margins. The margin increase resulted from:
Increasedyears and increased retail sales volumes of 41 percent to all major customer classesclasses.
Operation and maintenance: Increase of $800,000, largely from customer growthhigher contract services at certain generating stations. Partially offsetting the increase were lower payroll-related costs.
Depreciation, depletion and colder weatheramortization: Increase of $3.3 million as a result of increased plant balances.
Taxes, other than income: Increase of $1.0 million, primarily from higher property taxes in certain regionsjurisdictions.
Approved finalOther income: Decrease of $2.0 million, largely the result of lower returns on investments.
Interest expense: Comparable to the prior year.
Income taxes: Decrease of $14.2 million, largely due to the enactment of the TCJA reduced corporate tax rate, reduced income before income taxes and interim rate increasesthe absence of $2.1 million of income tax expense in 2018 for the revaluation of nonutility net deferred tax assets in 2017. Partially offsetting these decreases were lower production tax credits. A portion of the reduction in income taxes are being reserved against revenues, as previously discussed, resulting in a minimal impact on overall earnings.

 
3436 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Partially offsettingEarnings overview - The following information summarizes the performance of the natural gas distribution segment.
Years ended December 31,2019
2018
2017
 (Dollars in millions, where applicable)
Operating revenues$865.2
$823.2
$848.4
Purchased natural gas sold477.6
454.8
479.9
Taxes, other than income30.3
28.5
30.0
Adjusted gross margin357.3
339.9
338.5
Operating expenses:   
Operation and maintenance185.0
173.4
164.3
Depreciation, depletion and amortization79.6
72.5
69.4
Taxes, other than income23.5
21.7
20.5
Total operating expenses288.1
267.6
254.2
Operating income69.2
72.3
84.3
Other income7.2
.2
2.0
Interest expense35.5
30.7
31.2
Income before income taxes40.9
41.8
55.1
Income taxes1.4
4.1
22.8
Net income39.5
37.7
32.3
Loss/dividends on preferred stock

.1
Earnings$39.5
$37.7
$32.2
Volumes (MMdk)   
Retail sales:   
Residential69.4
63.7
63.6
Commercial49.1
44.4
44.3
Industrial5.2
4.5
4.6
 123.7
112.6
112.5
Transportation sales:   
Commercial2.2
2.2
2.0
Industrial163.9
147.3
142.5
 166.1
149.5
144.5
Total throughput289.8
262.1
257.0
Average cost of natural gas per dk$3.86
$4.04
$4.26
Adjusted gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. For additional information and reconciliation of the non-GAAP adjusted gross margin attributable to the natural gas distribution segment, see the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section later in this Item.
2019 compared to 2018 Natural gas distribution earnings increased $1.8 million (5 percent) as a result of:
Adjusted gross margin: Increase of $17.4 million, primarily driven by an increase werein retail sales volumes of 9.9 percent related to all customer classes due to colder weather, partially offset by weather normalization and conservation adjustments in certain jurisdictions, and approved rate recovery in certain jurisdictions. The adjusted gross margin was also positively impacted by higher rate realization due to higher conservation revenue, which offsets the conservation expense in operation and maintenance expense, which includes $4.6expense.
Operation and maintenance: Increase of $11.6 million, (after tax) largely fromrelated to higher payroll-related costs, andas well as higher depreciation,conservation expenses being recovered in revenue. The increase was partially offset by lower contract services, which includes the absence of the prior year's recognition of a non-recurring expense related to the approved WUTC general rate case settlement in the second quarter 2018.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense fromamortization: Increase of $7.1 million, primarily as a result of increased property, plant and equipment balances.
The previous table also includes lower nonutility projectTaxes, other than income: Increase of $1.8 million due to higher property taxes in certain jurisdictions and increased payroll taxes.
Other income: Increase of $7.0 million, largely resulting from higher returns on the Company's benefit plan investments and increased interest income related to higher gas costs reflectedto be collected from customers, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 19. Partially offsetting these increases was a write-down of a non-utility investment, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 8.
Interest expense: Increase of $4.8 million, largely resulting from increased debt balances to finance higher gas costs to be collected from customers, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 19.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 37



Part II

Income taxes: Decrease of $2.7 million, largely due to increased permanent tax benefits related to the Company's benefit plan investments.
2018 compared to 2017 Natural gas distribution earnings increased $5.5 million (17 percent) as a result of:
Adjusted gross margin: Increase of $1.4 million, primarily due to increased retail sales margins, mainly the result of weather normalization mechanisms in certain jurisdictions and conservation revenue, which offsets the conservation expense in operation and maintenance expense. Also contributing to the retail sales margin increase were higher basic service charges as a result of increased retail sales customers and rate design. These increases were partially offset by tax reform revenue impacts for refunds to customers as a result of lower income taxes due to the enactment of TCJA and lower volumes in certain jurisdictions.
Operation and maintenance: Increase of $9.1 million, largely related to conservation expenses being recovered in revenue; contract services, which includes the recognition of a non-recurring expense related to the approved WUTC general rate case settlement in the second quarter 2018; and higher payroll-related costs.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization: Increase of $3.1 million, primarily as a result of increased plant balances offset in part by lower depreciation rates implemented in certain jurisdictions.
Taxes, other than income: Increase of $1.2 million due to higher property taxes in certain jurisdictions.
Other income: Decrease of $1.8 million, primarily the result of lower returns on investments.
Interest expense: Comparable to the prior year.
Income taxes: Decrease of $18.7 million, largely due to the enactment of the TCJA reduced corporate tax rate, as well as the pass-throughabsence of lower natural gas prices which$4.3 million income tax expense related to the 2017 revaluation of nonutility net deferred tax assets, and reduced income before income taxes. A portion of the reduction in income taxes are reflectedbeing reserved against revenues or passed back to customers, as previously discussed, resulting in the decrease in both sales revenue and purchased natural gas sold in 2016.a minimal impact on overall earnings.
Outlook The Company expects these segments will grow rate base by approximately 65 percent annually over the next five years on a compound basis. This growth projection is on a much larger base, having grown rate base at a record pace of 12 percent compounded annually over the past five-year period. Operations are spread across eight states where the Company expects customer growth to be higher than the national average. Customer growth is expected to grow by 1 percent to 2 percent per year. This customer growth, along with system upgrades and replacements needed to supply safe and reliable service, will require investments in new and replacement electric generation and transmission and natural gas systems.
In February 2019, the Company announced that it intends to retire three aging coal-fired electric generating units, resulting from the Company's analysis showing that the plants are no longer expected to be cost competitive for customers. The retirements are expected to be in early 2021 for Lewis & Clark Station in Sidney, Montana, and in early 2022 for units 1 and 2 at Heskett Station in Mandan, North Dakota. In addition, the Company announced that it intends to construct Heskett Unit 4, an 88-MW simple-cycle natural gas-fired combustion turbine peaking unit at the existing Heskett Station near Mandan, North Dakota. Heskett Unit 4 production costs coupled with the MISO market purchases are expected to be about half the total cost of continuing to run the coal-fired electric generating units at Heskett and Lewis & Clark stations. Heskett Unit 4 was included in the Company's recently submitted integrated resource plan. On August 28, 2019, the Company filed for an advanced determination of prudence with the NDPSC for Heskett Unit 4. If approved, Heskett Unit 4 is expected to be placed into service in 2023. The Company filed requests for the usage of deferred accounting for the costs related to the retirement of Lewis & Clark Station and units 1 and 2 at Heskett Station with the NDPSC on September 16, 2019, the MTPSC on November 1, 2019 and the SDPUC on November 8, 2019. The SDPUC approved the use of deferred accounting as requested on January 7, 2020.
The Company continues to be focused on the regulatory recovery of its investments. Since, January 1, 2017, these segments have implemented rate increases in Idaho, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Wyoming and before the FERC. The Company files for rate adjustments to seek recovery of operating costs and capital investments, as well as reasonable returns as allowed by regulators. The Company's most recent cases by jurisdiction are discussed in Item 8 - Note 16.19.
With the enactment of the TCJA, the state regulators in jurisdictions where the segments operate have requested companies submit plans for the estimated impact of the TCJA. As such, the segments are using the deferral method of accounting for the revaluation of its regulated deferred tax assets and liabilities. The impact of the revaluation of the segments' regulatory deferred tax assets and liabilities in the fourth quarter of 2017, the period of enactment, have been included in the Company's regulatory assets and liabilities, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 4. The Company does not anticipate the corporate tax rate reduction to increase earnings at the utility businesses. The Company anticipates the TCJA will negatively impact the segments' cash flows due to not being able to immediately expense utility property.
In December 2016, the Company signed a 25-year agreement to purchase power from the expansion of the Thunder Spirit Wind farm in southwest North Dakota. In November 2017, the NDPSC approved the advance determination of prudence for the purchase of the Thunder Spirit Wind farm expansion. The Company expects to soon have a purchase agreement in place and finalize the purchase when the construction is complete in late 2018. With the addition of the expansion, the Company's total wind farm generation capacity will be approximately 155 MW and increase the Company's electric generation portfolio to approximately 27 percent renewables based on nameplate ratings. The Company's integrated resource plans in North Dakota and Montana include additional generation projects.
In June 2016, the Company, along with a partner, began construction on a 345-kilovolt transmission line from Ellendale, North Dakota, to Big Stone City, South Dakota. The estimated capital investment for this project is $130 million to $150 million. All necessary easements have been secured and the project is expected to be completed in 2019.38 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K
In 2018, the Company will begin the construction of a new 12-inch natural gas pipeline that will run approximately 21 miles from northeast Milnor, North Dakota, to southwest of Gwinner, North Dakota. The pipeline will serve, in part, a manufacturing facility in Gwinner and is expected to be in service by late 2018. The pipeline has the capacity to expand natural gas service to other key industries in the region.


Part II

Pipeline and Midstream
Strategy and challenges The pipeline and midstream segment provides natural gas transportation, gathering and underground storage services, as discussed in Items 1 and 2 - Business Properties. The segment focuses on utilizing its extensive expertise in the design, construction and operation of energy infrastructure and related services to increase market share and profitability through optimization of existing operations, organic growth and investments in energy-related assets within or in close proximity to its current operating areas. The segment focuses on the continual safety and reliability of its systems, which entails building, operating and maintaining safe natural gas pipelines and facilities. The segment continues to evaluate growth opportunities including the expansion of existing storage, gathering and transmission facilities; incremental pipeline projects which expand pipeline capacity;projects; and expansion of energy-related services leveraging on its core competencies. In support of this strategy, the Company completed and placed into service the following projects in 2019 and 2018:
In November 2019, Phase I of the Line Section 22 Expansion project in the region leveraging on core competencies.Billings, Montana, area increased capacity by 14.3 MMcf per day.
In September 2019, the Demicks Lake project in McKenzie County, North Dakota, increased capacity by 175 MMcf per day.
In November 2018, the Valley Expansion project in eastern North Dakota and far western Minnesota increased capacity by 40 MMcf per day.
In September 2018, the Line Section 27 Expansion project in the Bakken area of northwestern North Dakota increased capacity by over 200 MMcf per day and brought the total capacity of Line Section 27 to over 600 MMcf per day.
The segment is exposed to energy price volatility which is impacted by the fluctuations in pricing, production and basis differentials of the energy market's commodities. Legislative and regulatory initiatives to increase pipeline safety regulations and reduce methane emissions could also impact the price and demand for natural gas.
Tariff increases on steel and aluminum materials could negatively affect the segment's construction projects and maintenance work. The Company continues to monitor the impact of tariffs on raw material costs. The segment experiences extended lead times on raw materials that are critical to the segment's construction and maintenance work. Long lead times on materials could delay maintenance work and project construction potentially causing lost revenues and/or increased costs. The Company continues to proactively monitor and plan for the material lead times, as well as work with manufacturers and suppliers to help mitigate the risk of delays due to extended lead times.
The pipeline and midstream segment is subject to extensive regulation including certain operational, environmental and system integrity and environmental regulations, as well as various permit terms and operational compliance conditions. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration recently issued additional rules to strengthen the safety of natural gas transmission and storage facilities and hazardous liquid pipelines. The Company is currently evaluating the first phase of the rules. The segment is charged with the ongoing process of reviewing existing permits and easements, as well as securing new permits and easements as necessary to meet current demand and future

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 35



Part II

growth opportunities. Exposure to pipeline opposition groups could also cause negative impacts on the segment with increased costs and potential delays to project completion.
The segment focuses on the recruitment and retention of a skilled workforce to remain competitive and provide services to its customers. The industry in which it operates relies on a skilled workforce to construct energy infrastructure and operate existing infrastructure in a safe manner. A shortage of skilled personnel can create a competitive labor market which could increase costs incurred by the segment. Competition from other pipeline and midstream companies can also have a negative impact on the segment.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 39



Part II

Earnings overview - pipeline and midstream The following information summarizes the performance of the pipeline and midstream segment.
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
(Dollars in millions)(Dollars in millions)
Operating revenues$122.2
$141.6
$154.9
$140.4
$128.9
$122.2
Operating expenses:  
Operation and maintenance56.0
61.4
84.7
63.1
62.2
56.9
Depreciation, depletion and amortization16.8
24.9
28.0
21.2
17.9
16.8
Taxes, other than income12.5
11.9
12.2
13.3
12.7
12.5
Total operating expenses85.3
98.2
124.9
97.6
92.8
86.2
Operating income36.9
43.4
30.0
42.8
36.1
36.0
Earnings$20.5
$23.4
$13.3
Other income1.2
1.0
1.8
Interest expense7.2
5.9
5.0
Income before income taxes36.8
31.2
32.8
Income taxes7.2
2.7
12.3
Net income$29.6
$28.5
$20.5
Transportation volumes (MMdk)312.5
285.3
290.5
429.7
351.5
312.5
Natural gas gathering volumes (MMdk)16.1
20.0
33.4
13.9
14.9
16.1
Customer natural gas storage balance (MMdk):  
Beginning of period26.4
16.6
14.9
13.9
22.4
26.4
Net injection (withdrawal)(4.0)9.8
1.7
2.3
(8.5)(4.0)
End of period22.4
26.4
16.6
16.2
13.9
22.4
20172019 compared to 20162018 Pipeline and midstream earnings decreased $2.9increased $1.1 million (13(4 percent) comparedas a result of:
Revenues: Increase of $11.5 million, largely attributable to increased volumes of natural gas transported through its system as a result of organic growth projects, as previously discussed in Strategy and challenges, and increased rates effective May 1, 2019, due to the FERC rate case finalized in September 2019.
Operation and maintenance: Increase of $900,000, primarily from higher payroll-related costs and materials costs.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization: Increase of $3.3 million, primarily due to increased property, plant and equipment balances, largely the result of organic growth projects that have been placed into service, and higher depreciation rates effective May 1, 2019, due to the FERC rate case finalized in September 2019.
Taxes, other than income: Increase of $600,000 driven by higher property taxes in certain jurisdictions.
Other income: Comparable to the prior yearyear.
Interest expense: Increase of $1.3 million, largely resulting from lower gatheringhigher debt balances to finance organic growth projects, as previously discussed.
Income taxes: Increase of $4.5 million, primarily driven by the absence in 2019 of a $4.2 million income tax benefit, as discussed later.
2018 compared to 2017 Pipeline and processingmidstream earnings increased $8.0 million (39 percent) as a result of:
Revenues: Increase of $6.7 million, largely attributable to increased volumes of natural gas transported through its system as a result of completed organic growth projects, as previously discussed in Strategy and challenges, and higher nonregulated project workloads, which increased revenues of $14.0 million (after tax). The$4.1 million. These increases were partially offset by decreased storage-related revenues reflecting the decrease in revenues resulted from lower volumes from the sale of the Pronghorn assets in January 2017,natural gas pricing spreads, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 2. Also included in the decrease in earnings was income tax expense of $200,000 for the TCJA revaluation, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 11.Outlook section.
Partially offsetting the decrease were:
Lower depreciation, depletionOperation and amortization expensemaintenance: Increase of $5.0$5.3 million, (after tax) resulting from the absence of the Pronghorn assets, as previously discussed
Lower operation and maintenance expense, which includes $2.2 million (after tax) primarily from higher nonregulated project costs of $3.9 million directly related to the absence of Pronghorn,increase in nonregulated project workloads, as previously discussed, as well as the absence in 2017higher professional services, material costs and contract services.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization: Increase of a $1.4 million (after tax) fair value impairment in 2016 associated with the Pronghorn sale
Lower interest expense due to lower debt balances
Higher transportation revenues of $1.0$1.1 million, largely resulting from increased off-system transportation volumes due to recently completed organic growth projectsprojects.
2016 compared to 2015Taxes, other than income: Pipeline and midstream earnings increased $10.1 million (77 percent) largely due to:
Lower operation and maintenance expense, which includes $13.6 million (after tax) largely due to the absence in 2016 of impairments of natural gas gathering assets of $10.6 million (after tax), as discussed in Item 8 - Notes 1 and 5, lower payroll-related costs and lower material costs partially offset by a fair value impairment in 2016 of $1.4 million (after tax) associated with the sale of Pronghorn, as previously discussed
Lower depreciation, depletion and amortization of $1.9 million (after tax), largely dueComparable to the saleprior year.
Other income: Decrease of certain non-strategic natural gas gathering assets in the fourth quarter of 2015
Higher storage services earnings, primarily due to higher average interruptible storage balances
Lower interest expense of $1.2 million (after tax),$800,000, primarily the result of lower debt interest rates and balances
Partially offsetting the earnings increase was lower gathering and processing revenues of $8.0 million (after tax) resulting from lower natural gas gathering volumes, primarily due to the sale of certain non-strategic natural gas gathering assets, as previously discussed, and lower oil gathering volumes,returns on investments partially offset by higher oil gathering rates at Pronghorn.AFUDC.
Interest expense: Increase of $900,000, largely resulting from higher debt balances.

 
3640 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Income taxes: Decrease of $9.6 million, primarily resulting from the lower corporate tax rate due to the enactment of the TCJA creating a reduction to income tax expense, as well as the realization of a $4.2 million income tax benefit related to the reversal of a regulatory liability recorded in 2017 based on a FERC final accounting order issued during third quarter of 2018.
Outlook The Company has continued to feelexperience the effects of natural gas production at record levels, which keepshas provided opportunities for organic growth projects and increased demand. The completion of organic growth projects has contributed to the Company transporting increasing volumes of natural gas through its system. The record levels of natural gas supply have moderated the need for storage services and put downward pressure on natural gas prices and minimized pricing volatility. Both natural gas production levels and pressure on natural gas prices are expected to continue in the near term. The Company continues to focus on growth and improving existing operations through organic projects in all areas in which it operates. The following describes recentcurrent growth projects.
The Company's ValleyCompany began construction on the Line Section 22 Expansion project a 38-mile pipeline that will deliver natural gas supply to eastern North Dakota and far western Minnesota, is expected to be complete in the fourthBillings, Montana, area in May 2019. Phase I of the project was placed into service in November 2019, as previously discussed. Phase II has an expected in-service date in the first quarter of 2018. The project, which2020 and is designed to increase capacity by 8.2 MMcf per day to serve incremental demand in Billings, Montana. The Company has signed long-term contracts supporting the project.
The Company began construction on the Demicks Lake Expansion project, located in McKenzie County, North Dakota, in November 2019. In February 2020, the Company completed and placed the project into service. The Company has signed a long-term contract supporting this project, which increased capacity by 175 MMcf per day.
In January 2019, the Company announced the North Bakken Expansion project, which includes construction of a new pipeline, compression and ancillary facilities to transport 40 million cubic feetnatural gas from core Bakken production areas near Tioga, North Dakota, to a new connection with Northern Border Pipeline in McKenzie County, North Dakota. The Company's long-term customer commitments and anticipated incremental commitments with the continuing record levels of natural gas production in the Bakken region support the project at a design capacity of 350 MMcf per day, is under the jurisdiction of the FERC. In February 2018, the Company received an order issuing a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the FERC.day. Construction is expected to begin as soon asin early 2021 with an estimated completion date late in 2021, which is dependent on regulatory and environmental permitting. On June 28, 2019, the conditionsCompany filed with the FERC a request to initiate the National Environmental Policy Act pre-filing process and received FERC approval of the certificate have been met, including the receipt of outstanding permits.pre-filing request on July 3, 2019.
In June 2017,December 2019, the Company announced plansentered into a purchase and sale agreement with Scout Energy Group II, LP to complete a Line Section 27 expansion projectdivest of its regulated gathering assets located in the Bakken area of northwesternMontana and North Dakota. The project will includeDakota, which includes approximately 13400 miles of new pipelinenatural gas gathering pipelines and associated compression and ancillary facilities. The project, as designed, will increase capacityOn January 8, 2020, the Company filed an application with the FERC to authorize abandonment by over 200 million cubic feet per day and bring total capacitysale of the Line Section 27 to over 600 million cubic feet per day.gathering assets. The projectsale is expected to be placed in serviceclose in the fallfirst half of 2018.
In 2017, the Company completed and placed into service the Charbonneau and Line Section 25 expansion projects, which include a new compression station as well as other compressor additions and enhancements at existing stations. The Company's revenues have been positively impacted2020 with an effective date of January 1, 2020, pending approval by the increase in transportation volumes with these projects.
The impact of the TCJA on the pipeline and midstream industry is uncertain. With the enactment of the TCJA, the regulated pipeline is using the deferral method of accounting for the revaluation of its regulated deferred tax assets and liabilities. The impact of the revaluation of the regulated pipeline's regulatory deferred tax assets and liabilities in the fourth quarter of 2017, the period of enactment, have been included in the Company's regulatory assets and liabilities, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 4.FERC.
Construction Materials and Contracting
Strategy and challenges The construction materials and contracting segment provides an integrated set of aggregate-based construction services, as discussed in Items 1 and 2 - Business Properties. The segment focuses on high-growth strategic markets located near major transportation corridors and desirable mid-sized metropolitan areas; strengthening the long-term, strategic aggregate reserve position through available purchase and/or lease opportunities; enhancing profitability through cost containment, margin discipline and vertical integration of the segment's operations; development and recruitment of talented employees; and continued growth through organic and acquisition opportunities.
A key element of the Company's long-term strategy for this business is to further expand its market presence in the higher-margin materials business (rock, sand, gravel, liquid asphalt, asphalt concrete, ready-mixed concrete and related products), complementing and expanding on the segment's expertise. The segment expects to continue cost containment efforts, positioning its operations for the resurgence in the private market, while continuing the emphasis on industrial, energy and public works projects.Company's acquisition activity supports this strategy.
As one of the country's largest sand and gravel producers, the segment will continuecontinues to strategically manage its 1.0approximately 1.1 billion tons of aggregate reserves in all its markets, as well as take further advantage of being vertically integrated. The segment's vertical integration allows the segment to manage operations from aggregate mining to final lay-down of concrete and asphalt, with control of and access to permitted aggregate reserves being significant. The Company's aggregate reserves are naturally declining and as a result, the Company seeks acquisition opportunities to replace the reserves. In the first quarter of 2019, the Company purchased additional aggregate deposits in Texas that are estimated to contain a 40-year supply of high-quality aggregates. Also during 2019, the Company increased aggregate reserves by approximately 40 million tons largely due to strategic asset purchases.
The construction materials and contracting segment faces challenges that are not under the direct control of the business. The segment operates in geographically diverse and highly competitive markets. Competition can put negative pressure on the ability of the segment to earn a reasonable return.segment's operating margins. The segment is also subject to volatility in the cost of raw materials such as diesel fuel, gasoline, liquid asphalt, cement and steel. Although it is difficult to determine the split between inflation and supply/demand increases, diesel fuel costs remained fairly stable in

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 41



Part II

2019, while asphalt oil costs trended higher in 2019 as compared to 2018. Such volatility can have a negative impact on the segment's margins. Other variables that can impact the segment's margins include adverse weather conditions, the timing of project starts or completion and declines or delays in new and existing projects due to the cyclical nature of the construction industry.industry and governmental infrastructure spending.
The segment also faces challenges in the recruitment and retention of employees. Trends in the labor market include an aging workforce and availability issues. The segment also facescontinues to face increasing pressure to reducecontrol costs, as well as find and train a skilled workforce to meet the need for temporary employment becauseneeds of the seasonality of the work performed in certain regions.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 37



Part II

increasing demand and seasonal work.
Earnings overview - construction materials and contracting The following information summarizes the performance of the construction materials and contracting segment.
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
(Dollars in millions)(Dollars in millions)
Operating revenues$1,812.5
$1,874.3
$1,904.3
$2,190.7
$1,925.9
$1,812.5
Operating expenses: 
Cost of sales:  
Operation and maintenance1,500.7
1,533.2
1,576.4
1,798.3
1,601.7
1,500.1
Depreciation, depletion and amortization52.5
54.1
61.0
74.3
59.0
52.5
Taxes, other than income38.0
37.5
36.1
44.1
39.7
38.0
1,591.2
1,624.8
1,673.5
Total cost of sales1,916.7
1,700.4
1,590.6
Gross margin274.0
225.5
221.9
Selling, general and administrative expense:  
Operation and maintenance70.4
62.2
75.9
86.3
77.6
71.5
Depreciation, depletion and amortization3.4
4.3
4.9
3.1
2.2
3.4
Taxes, other than income3.8
4.3
4.0
4.6
4.3
3.8
77.6
70.8
84.8
Total operating expenses1,668.8
1,695.6
1,758.3
Total selling, general and administrative expense94.0
84.1
78.7
Operating income143.7
178.7
146.0
180.0
141.4
143.2
Earnings$123.4
$102.7
$89.1
Other income (expense)1.6
(3.1).4
Interest expense23.8
17.3
14.8
Income before income taxes157.8
121.0
128.8
Income taxes37.4
28.4
5.4
Net income$120.4
$92.6
$123.4
Sales (000's):  
Aggregates (tons)28,213
27,580
26,959
32,314
29,795
28,213
Asphalt (tons)6,237
7,203
6,705
6,707
6,838
6,237
Ready-mixed concrete (cubic yards)3,548
3,655
3,592
4,123
3,518
3,548
20172019 compared to 20162018 Earnings at the constructionConstruction materials and contracting businesscontracting's earnings increased $20.7$27.8 million (20(30 percent) compared to the prior year. The increase was theas a result of:
An income tax benefit of $41.9 million for the revaluation of the segment's net deferred tax liabilities, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 11
Higher aggregate marginsRevenues: Increase of $5.0$264.8 million (after tax) primarilydriven by higher contracting services and material sales due to strong commercial and residential demandeconomic environments in certain regions
Partially offsetting these increases were:
Lower asphalt product margins resulting from lower revenues driven by competitive pricing and lowerstates, as well as additional material volumes from unfavorable weather duringassociated with the first half of the year, less available work and increased competition in certain regions
Lower construction margins of $5.5 million (after tax), largely decreased workloads caused by unfavorable weather during the first half of the year and less available work in energy-producing states
Higher selling, general and administrative expense of $4.1 million (after tax) from the absence in 2017 of a $6.7 million (after tax) reduction to a MEPP withdrawal liability, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 14, offset in part by lower depreciation, depletion and amortization and lower office expense
2016 compared to 2015Earnings at the construction materials and contracting business increased $13.6 million (15 percent) due to:businesses acquired.
Higher construction marginsGross margin: Increase of $8.1$48.5 million, (after tax)largely resulting from higher revenues due to more available workstrong economic environments in mostcertain states, as previously discussed, higher contracting bid margins and higher realized material prices. Also contributing to the increased gross margin was an increase in gains on asset sales in certain regions
Lower selling, general and administrative expense from a $6.7 million (after tax) reduction in 2016 to a previously recorded MEPP withdrawal liability compared to an increase to a MEPP withdrawal liability of $1.5 million (after tax) in 2015, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 14
Higher asphalt product margins of $2.9approximately $7.5 million.
Selling, general and administrative expense: Increase of $9.9 million, (after tax)primarily related to the businesses acquired and higher payroll-related costs.
Other income (expense): Increased income of $4.7 million, largely the result of higher returns on the Company's benefit plan investments.
Interest expense: Increase of $6.5 million, largely resulting from higher volumesdebt balances as a result of recent acquisitions, capital expenditures and lower asphalt oil and production costshigher average interest rates.
Higher aggregate marginsIncome taxes: Increase of $2.3$9.0 million (after tax)directly resulting from higher volumes due to increased demand
Partially offsetting these increases were:
Higher effectivean increase in income tax rates
Lower other product lines margins of $1.3 million (after tax)
Lower diesel fuel costs contributed to higher earnings from all product lines in 2016.before taxes.

 
3842 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

2018 compared to 2017Construction materials and contracting's earnings decreased $30.8 million (25 percent) as a result of:
Revenues: Increase of $113.4 million driven by higher asphalt product and aggregate volumes due to increased agency demand, increased realized prices and lower material costs. Partially offsetting these increases were lower ready-mixed concrete volumes due to a decrease in available work and unfavorable weather conditions in certain regions.
Gross margin: Increase of $3.6 million resulting from higher asphalt product volumes and margins, largely from recent acquisitions and higher realized prices. Also contributing to the increase were higher aggregate volumes and margins due to strong market demand and lower material costs. Partially offsetting these increases were lower ready-mixed concrete volumes and margins due to a decrease in available work and unfavorable weather conditions in certain regions.
Selling, general and administrative expense: Increase of $5.4 million, primarily payroll-related costs, acquisition costs and higher insurance-related costs.
Other income (expense): Decrease of $3.5 million, largely the result of lower returns on investments.
Interest expense: Increase of $2.5 million, largely resulting from higher debt balances as a result of recent acquisitions, capital expenditures and higher working capital needs.
Income taxes: Increase of $23.0 million, primarily resulting from the absence in 2018 of a $41.9 million tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 for the revaluation of the segment's net deferred tax liabilities. Partially offsetting this increase were lower income taxes due to the enactment of the TCJA, which reduced the corporate tax rate.
Outlook The segment's vertically integrated aggregates basedaggregate-based business model provides the Company with the ability to capture margin throughout the sales delivery process. The aggregate products are sold internally and externally for use in other products such as ready-mixed concrete, asphaltic concrete and public and private construction markets. The contracting services and construction materials are sold primarily to construction contractors in connection with street, highway and other public infrastructure projects, as well as private commercial and residential development projects. The public infrastructure projects have traditionally been more stable markets as public funding is more secure during periods of economic decline. The public funding is, however, dependent on state and federal funding such as appropriations to the Federal Highway Administration. Spending on private development is highly dependent on both local and national economic cycles, providing additional sales during times of strong economic cycles.
The Company remains optimistic about overall economic growth and infrastructure spending. The IBIS WorldIBISWorld Incorporated Industry Report issued in June 2019 for sand and gravel mining in the United States projects a 2.71.1 percent annual growth rate over the next five years.through 2024. The report also states the demand for clay and refractory materials is projected to continue deteriorating in several downstream manufacturing industries, butindustries. However, the report expects this decline will be offset by stronger demand fromrising activity in the housing marketresidential and buoyant demand fromnonresidential construction markets, growing public sector investment in the highway and bridge construction market. Thismarkets and the oil and gas sector growth. The Company believes stronger demand in the housing construction markets along with continued demand from the highway and bridge construction markets should provide a stable demand for construction materials and contracting products and services in the near future.
During 2019 and 2018, the Company made strategic asset purchases and acquired businesses that support the Company's long-term strategy to expand its market presence. In the first quarter of 2019, the Company purchased additional aggregate deposits in Texas, which augments the segment's existing operations and enhances its ability to sell aggregates to third parties in the coming years. Also, in the first quarter of 2019, the Company acquired Viesko Redi-Mix, Inc., a ready mixed concrete supplier headquartered near Salem, Oregon. In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company acquired Roadrunner Ready Mix, Inc., a ready-mixed concrete supplier in Idaho. In the first quarter of 2020, the Company acquired the assets of Oldcastle Infrastructure Spokane, a prestressed-concrete business located in Spokane, Washington. The impact of the TCJACompany continues to evaluate additional acquisition opportunities. For more information on the economy asCompany's business combinations, see Item 8 - Note 3.
The construction materials and contracting segment had backlog at December 31, 2019, of $693 million, which was comparable to backlog at December 31, 2018, of $706 million. The Company expects to complete a whole is unclearsignificant amount of backlog at this time. As such,December 31, 2019, during the impact tonext 12 months.
During the second quarter of 2019, the governor of Oregon signed House Bill 3427, which creates a Corporate Activity Tax. The tax was enacted in the third quarter of 2019 and was effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. The Company expects the additional taxation will be less than $2.0 million annually at the construction materials and contracting industrysegment, which is also uncertain. Underdependent on the TCJA, the domestic production deduction will no longer be able to be taken. The domestic production deduction was originally introduced to incentivize domestic production activities and was a deductionlevel of up to 9 percent on qualified productiontaxable commercial activity income for which this segment's activities qualified. The Company expects the lower federal corporate tax rate will more than offset the loss of the domestic production deduction for this segment.in Oregon.
Construction Services
Strategy and challenges The construction services segment provides inside and outside specialty contracting, as discussed in Items 1 and 2 - Business Properties. The construction services segment focuses on safely executing projects; providing a superior return on investment by

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 43



Part II

building new and strengthening existing customer relationships; ensuring quality service; safely executing projects; effectively controlling costs; collecting on receivables; retaining, developing and recruiting talented employees; growing through organic and acquisition opportunities; and focusing efforts on projects that will permit higher margins while properly managing risk. The growth experienced by the segment in recent years is due in part to its ability to support national customers in most of the regions in which they operate.
The construction services segment faces challenges in the highly competitive markets in which it operates. Competitive pricing environments, project delays, changes in management's estimates of variable consideration and the effects from restrictive regulatory requirements have negatively impacted revenues and margins in the past and could affect revenues and margins in the future. Additionally, margins may be negatively impacted on a quarterly basis due to adverse weather conditions, as well as timing of project starts or completions, declines or delays in new projects due to the cyclical nature of the construction industry and other factors. These challenges may also impact the risk of loss on certain projects. Accordingly, operating results in any particular period may not be indicative of the results that can be expected for any other period.
The need to ensure available specialized labor resources for projects also drives strategic relationships with customers and project margins. These trends include an aging workforce and labor availability issues, increasing pressure to reduce costs and improve reliability, and increasing duration and complexity of customer capital programs. Due to these and other factors, we believethe Company believes overall customer and competitor demand for labor resources will continue to increase, possibly outpacing,surpassing the supply of industry resources.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 39



Part II

Earnings overview - construction servicesThe following information summarizes the performance of the construction services segment.
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
(In millions)(In millions)
Operating revenues$1,367.6
$1,073.3
$926.4
$1,849.3
$1,371.5
$1,367.6
Operating expenses: 
Cost of sales:  
Operation and maintenance1,153.9
905.4
783.7
1,555.4
1,150.4
1,153.9
Depreciation, depletion and amortization14.2
13.5
11.8
15.0
14.3
14.2
Taxes, other than income43.4
35.2
27.4
58.8
42.0
43.4
1,211.5
954.1
822.9
Total cost of sales1,629.2
1,206.7
1,211.5
Gross margin220.1
164.8
156.1
Selling, general and administrative expense:  
Operation and maintenance69.0
59.9
54.8
87.0
72.2
69.3
Depreciation, depletion and amortization1.5
1.8
1.6
2.0
1.4
1.5
Taxes, other than income4.0
3.8
3.7
4.7
4.4
4.0
74.5
65.5
60.1
Total operating expenses1,286.0
1,019.6
883.0
Total selling, general and administrative expense93.7
78.0
74.8
Operating income81.6
53.7
43.4
126.4
86.8
81.3
Earnings$53.3
$33.9
$23.8
Other income1.9
1.1
1.3
Interest expense5.3
3.6
3.7
Income before income taxes123.0
84.3
78.9
Income taxes30.0
20.0
25.6
Net income$93.0
$64.3
$53.3
20172019 compared to 20162018 Construction services earnings increased $19.4$28.7 million (57(45 percent) compared to the prior year largely becauseas a result of:
HigherRevenues: Increase of $477.8 million, largely resulting from higher inside specialty contracting marginsworkloads from an increase in customer demand for hospitality, data center and high-tech projects. Also contributing to the increase was higher outside specialty contracting workloads, primarily resulting from increased utility customer demand.
Gross margin: Increase of $12.8$55.3 million, (after tax) drivenprimarily due to the higher volume of work resulting in an increase in revenues, as previously discussed, partially offset by an increase in revenuesoperation and maintenance expense as a direct result of the increased workloads.
Selling, general and administrative expense: Increase of $15.7 million, resulting from increased payroll-related costs, as well as higher office expense and outside professional service costs.
Other income: Increase of $800,000, largely resulting from higher returns on the Company's benefit plan investments.
Interest expense: Increase of $1.7 million, related to higher debt balances as a result of additional working capital needs from the increase in contracting workloads in 2019.
Income taxes: Increase of $10.0 million, directly resulting from an increase in the number and size of construction projects in 2017 and decreased costs from the successful management of labor performance on projects in a majority of the business activities performed partially offset by job losses on certain projects
Higher outside specialty contracting margins of $9.8 million (after tax) driven by higher contracting workloads and equipment revenues in areas impacted by storm activity
An income tax benefit of $4.3 million for the revaluation of the segment's net deferred tax liabilities, as discussed in Item 8 - Note income before taxes.11
Partially offsetting these increases were:
Higher selling, general and administrative expense, largely payroll-related costs
The absence in 2017 of a $1.5 million tax benefit related to the disposition of a non-strategic asset
2016 compared to 2015 Construction services earnings increased $10.1 million (43 percent) compared to the prior year largely because of:
Higher inside specialty contracting margins of $13.0 million (after tax) resulting from higher workloads from the successful completion of construction projects in certain markets, as well as lower labor costs due to increased efficiencies and lower workers' compensation claim costs partially offset by a loss on a project
Higher margins of $3.5 million (after tax) resulting from the sale of a non-strategic asset in 2015
These increases were partially offset by:
Higher selling, general and administrative expense of $4.0 million (after tax), primarily due to higher payroll and benefit-related costs and higher bad debt expense
Lower outside construction margins, primarily lower equipment revenues impacted by decreased customer demand
OutlookThe Company continues to expect long-term growth in the electric transmission market, although the timing of large bids and subsequent construction is likely to be highly variable from year to year. The Company believes several multi-year transmission projects will be available for bid in the 2018 timeframe and also expects bidding activity in small and medium-sized transmission and distribution projects to continue in 2018.
The impact of the TCJA on the economy as a whole is unclear at this time. As such, the impact to the construction services industry is also uncertain. While it is unclear what impact the TCJA may have on the construction services industry, the Company is optimistic about overall economic growth and infrastructure spending and believes that improving industry activity will continue in both market segments and the drivers for investment will remain intact. The Company believes that regulatory reform, state renewable portfolio standards, the aging of the electric grid, and the general improvement of the economy will positively impact the level of spending by its customers. Although competition remains strong, these trends are viewed as positive factors in the future.

 
4044 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

2018 compared to 2017 Construction services earnings increased $11.0 million (21 percent) as a result of:
Revenues: Comparable to the prior year.
Gross margin: Increase of $8.7 million, largely resulting from higher outside specialty contracting gross margins due to increased outside equipment sales and rentals. Partially offsetting the increase were decreased inside specialty contracting gross margins as a result of decreased workloads and customer demand.
Selling, general and administrative expense: Increase of $3.2 million, primarily higher office expense, outside professional costs and payroll-related costs.
Other income: Comparable to the prior year.
Interest expense: Comparable to the prior year.
Income taxes: Decrease of $5.6 million, largely the lower corporate tax rate due to the enactment of the TCJA.
OutlookThe Company expects bidding activity to remain strong infor both outsideinside and insideoutside specialty construction companies for the year 2018.in 2020. Although bidding remains highly competitive in all areas, the Company expects the segment's skilled workforce, quality of service and effective cost management will continue to provide a benefit in securing and executing profitable projects.
The construction services segment had backlog at December 31, 2019, of $1.1 billion, up from $939 million at December 31, 2018. The 22 percent increase in backlog was largely attributable to the new project opportunities that the Company continues to be awarded across its diverse operations, particularly inside specialty electrical and mechanical contracting in the hospitality, high-tech, mission critical and public industries. The Company's outside power, communications and natural gas specialty contracting also have a high volume of available work. The Company expects to complete a significant amount of backlog at December 31, 2019, during the next 12 months. Additionally, the Company continues to further evaluate potential acquisition opportunities that would be accretive to the Company and continue to grow the Company's backlog.
In support of the Company's strategic plan to grow through acquisitions, the Company purchased the assets of Pride Electric, Inc., an electrical construction company in Redmond, Washington, in the third quarter of 2019. In the first quarter of 2020, the Company acquired PerLectric, Inc., an electrical construction company in Fairfax, Virginia. For more information on the Company's business combinations, see Item 8 - Note 3.
During the second quarter of 2019, the governor of Oregon signed House Bill 3427, which creates a Corporate Activity Tax. The tax was enacted in the third quarter of 2019 and was effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. The Company expects the additional taxation will be less than $2.0 million annually at the construction services segment, which is dependent on the level of taxable commercial activity in Oregon.
Other
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In millions)
 (In millions)
Operating revenues$7.9
$8.6
$9.2
$16.6
$11.3
$7.9
Operating expenses:  
Operation and maintenance6.2
6.6
15.4
15.6
9.3
6.3
Depreciation, depletion and amortization2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
Taxes, other than income.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
Total operating expenses8.4
8.8
17.6
17.8
11.4
8.5
Operating loss(.5)(.2)(8.4)(1.2)(.1)(.6)
Loss$(1.5)$(3.2)$(15.0)
Other income.9
1.0
.9
Interest expense1.9
2.8
3.6
Loss before income taxes(2.2)(1.9)(3.3)
Income taxes(.1)(1.2)(1.8)
Net loss$(2.1)$(.7)$(1.5)
Included in Other are generalis insurance activity at the Company's captive insurer which impacts both operating revenues and operation and maintenance expense. General and administrative costs and interest expense previously allocated to the exploration and production and refining businesses that do not meet the criteria for income (loss) from discontinued operations.
2017 compared to 2016Other loss decreased $1.7 million compared to the prior year primarily the result of lower interest expense from the repayment of long-term debt with the sale of the remaining exploration and production assets. Lower operation and maintenance expense was due to the absence of the refining businessoperations are also included in 2017 offset in part by the loss on the disposition of certain assets during the year.
2016 compared to 2015Other loss decreased $11.8 million compared to the prior year primarily due to lower operation and maintenance expense and interest expense previously allocated to the exploration and production business, due to the sale of that business which included the repayment of long-term debt. Also contributing to the decreased loss was lower operation and maintenance expense in 2016 due to the absence of a 2015 corporate asset impairment and the absence of a 2015 foreign currency translation loss including the effects of the sale of the Company's remaining interest in the Brazilian Transmission Lines.
Discontinued Operations
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
 (In millions)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before intercompany eliminations, net of tax$3.1
$(303.2)$(829.9)
Intercompany eliminations*(6.9)2.8
(4.2)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(3.8)(300.4)(834.1)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
(131.7)(35.3)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax$(3.8)$(168.7)$(798.8)
*
Includes eliminations for the presentation of income tax adjustments between continuing and discontinued operations.
2017 compared to 2016 The loss from discontinued operations attributable to the Company was $3.8 million compared to a loss of $168.7 million in the prior year. The decreased loss was largely due to the absence in 2017 of a loss associated with the sale of the refining business in June 2016, as well as the reversal in 2017 of a previously accrued liability due to the resolution of a legal matter, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 2.
2016 compared to 2015 The loss from discontinued operations attributable to the Company was $168.7 million compared to a loss of $798.8 million in the prior year. The decreased loss is primarily due to the completion of the sales of Company's exploration and production and refining businesses. The decreased loss was largely the result of the absence in 2016 of a noncash write-down of oil and natural gas properties of $315.3 million (after tax) and fair value impairments of the exploration and production business's assets held for sale of $475.4 million (after tax), as discussed in Item 8 - Note 2, partially offset by a fair value impairment of the refining business of $156.7 million (after tax) in 2016, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 2.Other. Additionally,

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 4145



Part II
 

operation and maintenance expense in 2018 included costs associated with the Holding Company Reorganization. For further details on the Company's reorganization, see Items 1 and 2 Business Properties - General.
Discontinued Operations
Years ended December 31,2019
2018
2017
 (In millions)
Income from discontinued operations before intercompany eliminations, net of tax$.3
$2.9
$3.1
Intercompany eliminations

(6.9)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax$.3
$2.9
$(3.8)
Included in discontinued operations are the results and supporting activities of Dakota Prairie Refining and Fidelity other than certain general and administrative costs and interest expense. The loss in 2017 was largely attributable to eliminations for the presentation of income tax adjustments between continuing and discontinued operations.
Intersegment Transactions
Amounts presented in the preceding tables will not agree with the Consolidated Statements of Income due to the Company's elimination of intersegment transactions. The amounts related to these items were as follows:
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In millions)
 (In millions)
Intersegment transactions:  
Operating revenues$58.0
$57.4
$78.8
$77.1
$64.3
$58.0
Operation and maintenance9.1
8.7
26.9
21.1
13.7
9.1
Purchased natural gas sold48.9
48.7
48.9
56.0
50.6
48.9
Income from continuing operations*(6.9)(6.3)(5.0)

(6.9)
*Includes eliminations for the presentation of income tax adjustments between continuing and discontinued operations.
 
For more information on intersegment eliminations, see Item 8 - Note 13.
New Accounting Standards
For information regarding new accounting standards, see Item 8 - Note 1, which is incorporated herein by reference.16.
Liquidity and Capital Commitments
At December 31, 20172019, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $34.6$66.5 million and available borrowing capacity of $687.1$644.4 million under the outstanding credit facilities of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company expects to meet its obligations for debt maturing within one year and its other operating and capital requirements from various sources, including internally generated funds; the Company's credit facilities, as described later in Capital resources; the issuance of long-term debt; and issuance of equity securities.
Cash flows
Operating activities The changes in cash flows from operating activities generally follow the results of operations as discussed in Business Segment Financial and Operating Data and are also are affected by changes in working capital. Changes in cash flows for discontinued operations are related to the Company's former exploration and production and refining businesses.
Cash flows provided by operating activities in 2017 decreased $14.22019 increased $42.4 million from 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease in cash flows provided by operating activities reflectsin 2019 was largely driven by increased earnings from higher working capital requirementsworkloads at the construction services business largely resulting frombusinesses, which were partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable as a result of the higher receivablesworkloads. Lower inventory balances due to increasedhigher workloads during the year and at the construction materials and contracting business in 2019 as compared to the increase in inventory balances in 2018 due to higher receivables resulting from increased workloads later in the year. Higheractivity of acquired businesses also contributed to the increase. Partially offsetting these increases were higher natural gas purchases including the effects of colder weather, also added to higher working capital requirementsgas costs and the timing of collection of such balances from customers at the natural gas distribution business. Higher income taxes paid from continuing operations was largely offset bybusiness, as well as higher income taxes received from discontinued operations resulting frompension contributions at all of the realization of net operating losses at the discontinued operations. Higher earnings from continuing operations in 2017, compared to 2016, partially offset the decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities. Higher margins at the electric, natural gas distribution and construction services businesses were partially offset by lower margins at the construction materials business.businesses.
Cash flows provided by operating activities in 2016 decreased $199.62018 increased $51.9 million from 2015.2017. The decreaseincrease in cash flows provided by operating activities was largely from lower cash flowsdriven by stronger collection of accounts receivable at the exploration and production business. The decrease was also due to higher working capital requirements at the electric, natural gas distribution and pipeline and midstream businesses. Partially offsetting the decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities was higher cash flows from continuing operations (excluding working capital) at the electric, pipeline and midstreamconstruction services and construction materials and contracting businesses.
Investing activities Cash flows used in investing activities in 2017 decreased $90.9 million from 2016businesses and bonus depreciation for tax purposes due to the enactment of TCJA at the construction materials and contracting business. Partially offsetting these increases were higher inventory balances at the construction materials and contracting business due to higher asphalt oil inventory, largely resulting from net proceedshigher average per ton cost, and higher aggregate inventory from the sale of Pronghorn in January 2017 at the pipeline and midstream business.
Cash flows used in investing activities in 2016 decreased $77.4 million from 2015 primarily due to lower capital expenditures largely at the electric and refining businesses. Partially offsetting this decrease were lower proceeds from the sale of properties at the exploration and production business.
Financing activitiesCash flows used in financing activities in 2017 increased $50.4 million from 2016 primarily due to the higher net repayment of long-term debt.production. Also

 
4246 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

contributing to the decrease were decreased deferral of production tax credits, re-measurements of taxes on investments and accelerated tax deductions related to TCJA.
Investing activitiesCash flows used in investing activities in 2019 decreased $107.0 million from 2018. The decrease in cash used was primarily related to $112.1 million lower cash used in acquisition activity in 2019 compared to 2018 at the construction materials and contracting business and higher proceeds on asset sales at the construction businesses in 2019.
Cash flows used in investing activities in 2018 increased $496.7 million from 2017. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily related to acquisition activity in 2018 at the construction materials and contracting business; the absence in 2018 of net proceeds from the sale of Pronghorn in January 2017 and higher capital expenditures in 2018 at the pipeline and midstream business; and higher capital expenditures related to various construction projects in 2018 at the electric and natural gas distribution businesses.
Financing activitiesCash flows provided by financing activities in 20162019 decreased $60.8$156.3 million from 2015 primarily2018. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities was largely due to the lowerhigher repayment of long-term debt of $250.9 million, partially offset byin 2019 on debt repaymentissued in connection with the sale of the refining business, lower capital contributions2018 for acquisitions at the refining businessconstruction materials and lowercontracting business. The Company also borrowed and repaid short-term borrowings in 2019. Partially offsetting the decrease in cash provided by financing activities was the receipt of proceeds from the issuance of common stock. The Company issued common stock for net proceeds of $106.8 million under its "at-the-market" offering and 401(k) plan in 2019.
Cash flows provided by financing activities in 2018 increased $475.7 million from 2017. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was largely due to increased debt issuance from an increase in commercial paper balances used for acquisitions, ongoing capital expenditures and working capital needs at the construction materials and contacting business; the issuance of an additional $200 million in term loans for capital projects at the electric and natural gas distribution businesses; and the issuance of an additional $40 million under the private shelf agreement for capital projects at the pipeline and midstream business. The increase in issuance of long-term debt was partially offset by higher debt repayment on a line of $36.9 million.credit at the natural gas distribution business; higher debt repayment on debt that matured during third quarter 2018 at the electric and natural gas distribution businesses; and the strong collection of accounts receivable resulting in lower commercial paper balances at the construction services business.
Defined benefit pension plans
The Company has noncontributory qualified defined benefit pension plans for certain employees. Plan assets consist of investments in equity and fixed-income securities. Various actuarial assumptions are used in calculating the benefit expense (income) and liability (asset) related to the pension plans. Actuarial assumptions include assumptions about the discount rate and expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as determined by the Company within certain guidelines.assets. At December 31, 20172019, the pension plans' accumulated benefit obligations exceeded these plans' assets by approximately $91.5$55.9 million. Pretax pension expense reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 20172019, 20162018 and 20152017, was $2.5 million, $843,000 and $1.7 million, $2.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The Company's pension expense is currently projected to be approximately $2.0 million to $3.0 million$300,000 in 20182020. Funding for the pension plans is actuarially determined. The minimum required contributions for 2017the years ended December 31, 2019 and 20152018, were approximately $3.1$4.9 million and $3.9$6.1 million,, respectively. There were no minimum required contributions for 2016.the year ended December 31, 2017. For more information on the Company's pension plans, see Item 8 - Note 14.17.
Capital expenditures
The Company's capital expenditures from continuing operations for 20152017 through 20172019 and as anticipated for 20182020 through 20202022 are summarized in the following table.
 Actual (a) Estimated
 2015
2016
2017
 2018
2019
2020
 (In millions)
Capital expenditures:       
Electric$333
$111
$109
 $229
$107
$98
Natural gas distribution131
126
147
 203
211
172
Pipeline and midstream18
35
31
 97
100
109
Construction materials and contracting48
38
44
 79
78
76
Construction services38
60
19
 17
16
16
Other4
2
2
 3
2
1
Total capital expenditures$572
$372
$352
 $628
$514
$472
 Actual* Estimated
 2017
2018
2019
 2020
2021
2022
 (In millions)
Capital expenditures:       
Electric$109
$186
$99
 $111
$128
$139
Natural gas distribution147
206
207
 221
191
180
Pipeline and midstream31
70
71
 85
304
53
Construction materials and contracting44
280
190
 167
154
157
Construction services19
25
61
 61
20
20
Other2
2
8
 5
3
3
Total capital expenditures$352
$769
$636
 $650
$800
$552
(a)*
Capital expenditures for 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 include noncash transactions such as the issuance of the Company's equity securities in connection with acquisitions, capital expenditure-related accounts payable and AFUDC, totaling $4.8 million, $33.4 million and $10.5 million, $(15.8) million and $35.3 million, respectively.
 

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 47



Part II

The 20172019 capital expenditures include the two business combinations at the construction materials and contracting segment and one business combination at the construction services segment, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 3. The 2019 capital expenditures were met fromfunded by internal sources.sources, issuance of long-term debt and issuance of the Company's equity securities. The Company has included in the estimated capital expenditures for 20182020 through 2022 the purchase of the Thunder Spirit Wind farm expansion, the ValleyDemicks Lake Expansion project, North Bakken Expansion project, construction of Heskett Unit 4 and the Line Section 27 expansion project,recently completed business combination at the construction services segment, as previously discussed in Business Segment Financial and Operating Data.
Estimated capital expenditures for the years 20182020 through 20202022 include those for:
System upgrades
Routine replacements
Service extensions
Routine equipment maintenance and replacements
Buildings, land and building improvements
Pipeline gathering and other midstreamnatural gas storage projects
Power generation and transmission opportunities including certain costs for additional electric generating capacity
Environmental upgrades
Other growth opportunities
The Company continues to evaluate potential future acquisitions and other growth opportunities;opportunities that would be incremental to the outlined capital program; however, they are dependent upon the availability of economic opportunities and, as a result, capital expenditures may vary significantly from the estimates in the preceding table. It is anticipated that all of the funds required for capital expenditures for the years 20182020 through 20202022 will be met fromfunded by various sources, including internally generated funds; the Company's credit facilities, as described later; issuance of long-term debt; and issuance of debt and equity securities.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 43



Part II

Capital resources
Certain debt instruments of the Company and itsCompany's subsidiaries, including those discussed later, contain restrictive and financial covenants and cross-default provisions. In order to borrow under the respective creditdebt agreements, the Company and its subsidiariessubsidiary companies must be in compliance with the applicable covenants and certain other conditions, all of which the Company and its subsidiaries, as applicable, were in compliance with at December 31, 20172019. In the event the Company and its subsidiaries do not comply with the applicable covenants and other conditions, alternative sources of funding may need to be pursued. For more information on the covenants, certain other conditions and cross-default provisions, see Item 8 - Note 6.9.
The following table summarizes the outstanding revolving credit facilities of the Company and itsCompany's subsidiaries at December 31, 20172019:
CompanyFacility 
Facility
Limit

 Amount Outstanding
 
Letters
of Credit

 
Expiration
Date
Facility 
Facility
Limit

 Amount Outstanding
 
Letters
of Credit

 
Expiration
Date
  (In millions)  (In millions)
MDU Resources Group, Inc.Commercial paper/Revolving credit agreement(a) $175.0
 $73.8
(b)$
 5/8/19
Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.Commercial paper/Revolving credit agreement(a) $175.0
 $118.6
(b)$
 12/19/24
Cascade Natural Gas CorporationRevolving credit agreement $75.0
(c)$17.3
 $2.2
(d)4/24/20Revolving credit agreement $100.0
(c)$64.6
 $2.2
(d)6/7/24
Intermountain Gas CompanyRevolving credit agreement $85.0
(e)$40.0
 $
 4/24/20Revolving credit agreement $85.0
(e)$24.5
 $1.4
(d)6/7/24
Centennial Energy Holdings, Inc.Commercial paper/Revolving credit agreement(f)$500.0
 $14.6
(b)$
 9/23/21Commercial paper/Revolving credit agreement(f)$600.0
 $104.3
(b)$
 12/19/24
(a)The commercial paper program is supported by a revolving credit agreement with various banks (provisions allow for increased borrowings, at the option of the CompanyMontana-Dakota on stated conditions, up to a maximum of $225.0 million). There were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit agreement.
(b)Amount outstanding under commercial paper program.
(c)Certain provisions allow for increased borrowings, up to a maximum of $100.0$125.0 million.
(d)Outstanding letter(s) of credit reduce the amount available under the credit agreement.
(e)Certain provisions allow for increased borrowings, up to a maximum of $110.0 million.
(f)The commercial paper program is supported by a revolving credit agreement with various banks (provisions allow for increased borrowings, at the option of Centennial on stated conditions, up to a maximum of $600.0$700.0 million). There were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit agreement.
 
The Company's and Centennial's respective commercial paper programs are supported by revolving credit agreements. While the amount of commercial paper outstanding does not reduce available capacity under the respective revolving credit agreements, the CompanyMontana-Dakota and Centennial do not issue commercial paper in an aggregate amount exceeding the available capacity under their credit agreements. The commercial paper borrowings may vary during the period, largely the result of fluctuations in working capital requirements due to the seasonality of the construction businesses.
The Company's coverage of fixed charges including preferred stock dividends was 4.2 times and 3.9 times for the 12 months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The coverage of fixed charges is used as an indicatorcertain operations of the Company's ability to satisfy fixed charges.subsidiaries.

48 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Total equity as a percent of total capitalization was 5956 percent and 5655 percent at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. This ratio is calculated as the Company's total equity, divided by the Company's total capital. Total capital is the Company's total debt, including short-term borrowings and long-term debt due within one year, plus total equity. This ratio is an indicator of how the Company is financing its operations, as well as its financial strength.
The Company currently has a shelf registration statement on file with the SEC, under which the Company may issue and sell any combination of common stock and debt securities. The Company may sell such securities if warranted by market conditions and the Company's capital requirements. Any public offer and sale of such securities will be made only by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Company's board of directors currently has authorized the issuance and sale of up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion worth of such securities. The Company's board of directors reviews this authorization on a periodic basis and the aggregate amount of securities authorized may be increased in the future.
On February 22, 2019, the Company entered into a Distribution Agreement with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and MUFG Securities Americas Inc., as sales agents, with respect to the issuance and sale of up to 10.0 million shares of the Company's common stock in connection with an “at-the-market” offering. The common stock may be offered for sale, from time to time, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock under the agreement have been and are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, which may include, among other things, working capital, capital expenditures, debt repayment and the financing of acquisitions.
The Company issued 3.6 million shares of common stock for the year ended December 31, 2019, pursuant to the “at-the-market” offering. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company received net proceeds of $94.0 million and paid commissions to the sales agents of approximately $950,000 in connection with the sales of common stock under the "at-the-market" offering. The net proceeds were used for capital expenditures and acquisitions. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had remaining capacity to issue up to 6.4 million additional shares of common stock under the "at-the-market" offering program.
Certain of the Company's debt instruments use LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing the applicable interest rate. LIBOR is the subject of recent national, international and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms and other pressures may cause LIBOR to disappear entirely or to perform differently than in the past. The Company has been proactive to anticipate the reform of LIBOR by replacing it with Secured Overnight Financing Rate in certain of its new debt instruments, as well as those that are being renewed. The Company continues to evaluate the impact the reform will have on its debt instruments and, at this time, does not anticipate a significant impact.
The following includes information related to the preceding table.
MDU Resources Group, Inc.Montana-Dakota On January 1, 2019, the Company's revolving credit agreement and commercial paper program became Montana-Dakota's revolving credit agreement and commercial paper program as a result of the Holding Company Reorganization. The Company'soutstanding balance of the revolving credit agreement was also transferred to Montana-Dakota. All of the related terms and covenants of the credit agreements remained the same.
On December 19, 2019, Montana-Dakota amended and restated its revolving credit agreement extending the maturity date to December 19, 2024. Montana-Dakota's revolving credit agreement supports its commercial paper program. Commercial paper borrowings under this agreement are classified as long-term debt as they are intended to be refinanced on a long-term basis through continued commercial paper borrowings. The Company'sMontana-Dakota's objective is to maintain acceptable credit ratings in order to access the capital markets through the issuance of commercial paper. Historically, downgrades in the Company's credit ratings have not limited, nor are currently expected to limit, the Company'sMontana-Dakota's ability to access the capital markets. If the CompanyMontana-Dakota were to experience a downgrade of its credit ratings in the future, it may need to borrow under its credit agreement and may experience an increase in overall interest rates with respect to its cost of borrowings.
Prior to the maturity of the credit agreement, the CompanyMontana-Dakota expects that it will negotiate the extension or replacement of this agreement. If the CompanyMontana-Dakota is unable to successfully negotiate an extension of, or replacement for, the credit agreement, or if the fees on this facility become too expensive, which the CompanyMontana-Dakota does not currently anticipate, the Companyit would seek alternative funding.
On July 24, 2019, Montana-Dakota entered into a $200.0 million note purchase agreement with maturity dates ranging from October 17, 2039 to November 18, 2059, at a weighted average interest rate of 3.95 percent.
Cascade Natural Gas Corporation On April 25, 2017,June 7, 2019, Cascade amended its revolving credit agreement to increase the borrowing limit from $50.0 million to $75.0$100.0 million and extend the terminationmaturity date from July 9, 2018 to April 24, 2020. TheJune 7, 2024. Any borrowings under the revolving credit agreement containsare classified as long-term debt as they are intended to be refinanced on a long-term basis through continued borrowings.

 
44 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K49



Part II
 

customary covenants and provisions, includingOn June 13, 2019, Cascade issued $75.0 million of senior notes under a covenantnote purchase agreement with maturity dates ranging from June 13, 2029 to June 13, 2049, at a weighted average interest rate of Cascade not to permit, at any time, the ratio of total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 653.93 percent. Other covenants include restrictions on the sale of certain assets, limitations on indebtedness and the making of certain investments.
Cascade'sIntermountain On June 7, 2019, Intermountain amended its revolving credit agreement also contains cross-default provisions. These provisions state that if Cascade fails to make any payment with respectextend the maturity date to any indebtedness or contingent obligation, in excess of a specified amount, under any agreement that causes such indebtedness to be due prior to its stated maturity or the contingent obligation to become payable, Cascade will be in defaultJune 7, 2024. Any borrowings under the revolving credit agreement.agreement are classified as long-term debt as they are intended to be refinanced on a long-term basis through continued borrowings.
On June 13, 2019, Intermountain issued $50.0 million of senior notes under a note purchase agreement with maturity dates ranging from June 13, 2029 to June 13, 2049, at a weighted average interest rate of 3.92 percent.
Intermountain Gas CompanyCentennial On April 25, 2017, IntermountainDecember 19, 2019, Centennial amended and restated its revolving credit agreement to increase the borrowing limit from $65.0 millioncapacity to $85.0$600.0 million and extend the terminationmaturity date from July 13, 2018 to April 24, 2020. The credit agreement contains customary covenants and provisions, including a covenant of Intermountain not to permit, at any time, the ratio of total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 65 percent. Other covenants include restrictions on the sale of certain assets, limitations on indebtedness and the making of certain investments.
Intermountain's credit agreement also contains cross-default provisions. These provisions state that if Intermountain fails to make any payment with respect to any indebtedness or contingent obligation, in excess of a specified amount, under any agreement that causes such indebtedness to be due prior to its stated maturity or the contingent obligation to become payable, or certain conditions result in an early termination date under any swap contract that is in excess of a specified amount, then Intermountain will be in default under the revolving credit agreement.
Centennial Energy Holdings, Inc.December 19, 2024. Centennial's revolving credit agreement supports its commercial paper program. Commercial paper borrowings under this agreement are classified as long-term debt as they are intended to be refinanced on a long-term basis through continued commercial paper borrowings. Centennial's objective is to maintain acceptable credit ratings in order to access the capital markets through the issuance of commercial paper. Historically, downgrades in Centennial's credit ratings have not limited, nor are currently expected to limit, Centennial's ability to access the capital markets. If Centennial were to experience a downgrade of its credit ratings in the future, it may need to borrow under its credit agreement and may experience an increase in overall interest rates with respect to its cost of borrowings.
Prior to the maturity of the Centennial credit agreement, Centennial expects that it will negotiate the extension or replacement of this agreement, which provides credit support to access the capital markets. In the event Centennial is unable to successfully negotiate this agreement, or in the event the fees on this facility become too expensive, which Centennial does not currently anticipate, it would seek alternative funding.
On April 4, 2019, Centennial issued $150.0 million of senior notes under a note purchase agreement with maturity dates ranging from April 4, 2029 to April 4, 2034, at a weighted average interest rate of 4.60 percent.
WBI Energy Transmission Inc. On July 26, 2019, WBI Energy Transmission has a $200.0 millionamended its uncommitted note purchase and private shelf agreement with anto increase capacity to $300.0 million and extend the issuance period and expiration date ofto May 16, 2019.2022. On December 16, 2019, WBI Energy Transmission issued $45.0 million of senior notes under the private shelf agreement with a maturity date of December 16, 2034, at an interest rate of 4.17 percent. WBI Energy Transmission had $100.0$170.0 million of notes outstanding at December 31, 2017,2019, which reduced the remaining capacity under this uncommitted private shelf agreement to $100.0$130.0 million. On December 22, 2017, WBI Energy Transmission contracted to issue an additional $40.0 million under
Dividend restrictions
For information on the private shelf agreement at an interest rate of 4.18 percent on June 15, 2018.Company's dividends and dividend restrictions, see Item 8 - Note 12.
Off balance sheet arrangements
As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company had no material off balance sheet arrangements as defined by the rules of the SEC.
Contractual obligations and commercial commitments
For more information on the Company's contractual obligations on long-term debt, operating leases and purchase commitments, see
Item 8 - Notes 69 and 17.20. At December 31, 20172019, the Company's commitments under these obligations were as follows:
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5 years
Total
(In millions)(In millions)
Long-term debt$148.5
$125.5
$73.0
$15.3
$147.2
$1,211.0
$1,720.5
Estimated interest payments*71.2
62.6
62.2
59.1
58.7
512.9
826.7
Long-term debt maturities*$16.6
$149.5
$451.3
$1,632.8
$2,250.2
Estimated interest payments**.8
6.6
13.9
74.4
95.7
Operating leases55.5
45.3
33.2
18.6
7.0
40.8
200.4
35.2
41.8
17.6
47.9
142.5
Purchase commitments360.8
215.0
162.4
135.3
99.1
773.8
1,746.4
405.5
434.5
210.5
678.4
1,728.9
$636.0
$448.4
$330.8
$228.3
$312.0
$2,538.5
$4,494.0
$458.1
$632.4
$693.3
$2,433.5
$4,217.3
*EstimatedUnamortized debt issuance costs and discount are excluded from the table.
**Represents the estimated interest payments are calculated based onassociated with the applicableCompany's long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2019, assuming current interest rates and payment dates.consistent amounts outstanding until their respective maturity dates over the periods indicated in the table above.
 

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 45



Part II

At December 31, 20172019, the Company had total liabilities of $342.0$417.6 million related to asset retirement obligations that are excluded from the table above. Of the total asset retirement obligations, the current portion was $4.3 million at December 31, 20172019, and was included in

50 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

other accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remainder, which constitutes the long-term portion of asset retirement obligations, was included in deferred credits and other liabilities - other on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Due to the nature of these obligations, the Company cannot determine precisely when the payments will be made to settle these obligations. For more information, see Item 8 - Note 7.10.
Not reflected in the previous table are $576,000 in uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2019.
The Company has no uncertain tax positions in 2018.
The Company's minimum funding requirements for its defined benefit pension plans for 20182020, which are not reflected due to the additional contribution of $20.0 million in the previous table, are $3.1 million. For information on potential contributions above the funding minimum requirements, see item 8 - Note 14.2019.
The Company's MEPP contributions are based on union employee payroll, which cannot be determined in advance for future periods. The Company may also be required to make additional contributions to its MEPPs as a result of their funded status. For more information, see Item 1A - Risk Factors and Item 8 - Note 14.17.
New Accounting Standards
For information regarding new accounting standards, see Item 8 - Note 1, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Critical Accounting Policies Involving Significant Estimates
The Company has prepared its financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company's significant accounting policies are discussed in Item 8 - Note 1.
Estimates are used for items such as impairment testing of long-lived assets and goodwill; fair values of acquired assets and liabilities under the acquisition method of accounting; aggregate reserves; property depreciable lives; tax provisions; revenue recognized using the cost-to-cost measure of progress for contracts; uncollectible accounts; environmental and other loss contingencies; accumulated provision for revenues subjectregulatory assets expected to refund;be recovered in rates charged to customers; costs on construction contracts; unbilled revenues; actuarially determined benefit costs; asset retirement obligations; lease classification; present value of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities; and the valuation of stock-based compensation. The Company's critical accounting policies are subject to judgments and uncertainties that affect the application of such policies. As discussed below, the Company's financial position or results of operations may be materially different when reported under different conditions or when using different assumptions in the application of such policies.
As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates are revised. Consequently, operating results can be affected by revisions to prior accounting estimates. The following critical accounting policies involve significant judgments and estimates.
Impairment of long-lived assets and intangibles
The Company reviews the carrying values of its long-lived assets and intangibles, excluding assets held for sale, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable and at least annually for goodwill.
Goodwill The Company performs its goodwill impairment testing annually in the fourth quarter. In addition, the test is performed on an interim basis whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. Examples of such events or circumstances may include a significant adverse change in business climate, weakness in an industry in which the Company's reporting units operate or recent significant cash or operating losses with expectations that those losses will continue.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process performed at the reporting unit level. The Company has determined that the reporting units for its goodwill impairment test are its operating segments, or components of an operating segment, that constitute a business for which discrete financial information is available and for which segment management regularly reviews the operating results. For more information on the Company's operating segments, see Item 8 - Note 13. The first step of the16. Goodwill impairment, test involvesif any, is measured by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, the testgoodwill of the reporting unit is complete and no impairment is recorded.not impaired. If the faircarrying value of a reporting unit is less thanexceeds its fair value, the Company must record an impairment loss for the amount that the carrying value step two of the test is performed to determinereporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds the amount of impairment loss, if any. The impairment is computed by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill to the carrying value of that goodwill. If the carrying value is greater than the implied fair value, an impairment loss must be recorded.unit. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018 and 2015,2017, there were no significant impairment losses recorded. At December 31, 2017,2019, the fair value substantially exceeded the carrying value at all reporting units.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires judgment and the use of significant estimates which include assumptions about the Company's future revenue, profitability and cash flows, amount and timing of estimated capital expenditures, inflation rates, weighted averagerisk adjusted capital cost, of capital, operational plans, and current and future economic conditions, among others. The fair value of each reporting unit is

 
46 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K51



Part II
 

determined using a weighted combination of income and market approaches. The Company uses a discounted cash flow methodology for its income approach. Under the income approach, the discounted cash flow model determines fair value based on the present value of projected cash flows over a specified period and a residual value related to future cash flows beyond the projection period. Both values are discounted using a rate which reflects the best estimate of the weighted averagerisk adjusted capital cost of capital at each reporting unit. The weighted averageRisk adjusted capital cost, of capital, which varies by reporting unit and iswas in the range of 54 percent to 9 percent, and a long-term growth rate projection of approximately 3 percent werewas utilized in the goodwill impairment test performed in the fourth quarter of 2017.2019. The goodwill impairment test also utilizes a long-term growth rate projection, which varies by reporting unit and was in the range of approximately 2 percent to 3 percent in the goodwill impairment test performed in the fourth quarter of 2019. Under the market approach, the Company estimates fair value using various multiples derived from comparable sales transactions and enterprise value to EBITDA for comparative peer companies for each respective reporting unit. These multiples are applied to operating data for each reporting unit to arrive at an indication of fair value. In addition, the Company adds a reasonable control premium when calculating the fair value utilizing the peer multiples, which is estimated as the premium that would be received in a sale in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Company believes that the estimates and assumptions used in its impairment assessments are reasonable and based on available market information.
Long-Lived Assets Unforeseen events and changes in circumstances and market conditions and material differences in the value of long-lived assets and intangibles due to changes in estimates of future cash flows could negatively affect the fair value of the Company's assets and result in an impairment charge. If an impairment indicator exists for tangible and intangible assets, excluding goodwill, the asset group held and used is tested for recoverability by comparing an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets compared to the carrying value of the assets. If impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value.
There is risk involved when determining the fair value of assets, tangible and intangible, as there may be unforeseen events and changes in circumstances and market conditions that have a material impact on the estimated amount and timing of future cash flows. In addition, the fair value of the asset could be different using different estimates and assumptions in the valuation techniques used.
The Company believes its estimates used in calculating the fair value of long-lived assets, including goodwill and identifiable intangibles, are reasonable based on the information that is known when the estimates are made.
Business combinations
The Company accounts for acquisitions on the Consolidated Financial Statements starting from the date of the acquisition, which is the date that control is obtained. The acquisition method of accounting requires acquired assets and liabilities assumed be recorded at their respective fair values as of the date of the acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. The estimation of fair values of acquired assets and liabilities assumed by the Company requires significant judgment and requires various assumptions. Although independent appraisals may be used to assist in the determination of the fair value of certain assets and liabilities, the appraised values may be based on significant estimates provided by management. The amounts and useful lives assigned to depreciable and amortizable assets compared to amounts assigned to goodwill, which is not amortized, can affect the results of operations in the period of and periods subsequent to a business combination.
In determining fair values of acquired assets and liabilities assumed, the Company uses various observable inputs for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and various unobservable inputs, which includes the use of valuation models. Fair values are based on various factors including, but not limited to, age and condition of property, maintenance records, auction values for equipment with similar characteristics, recent sales and listings of comparable properties, data collected from drill holes and other subsurface investigations and geologic data. The Company primarily uses the market and cost approaches in determining the fair value of land and property, plant and equipment. A combination of the market and income approaches are used for aggregate reserves and intangibles, primarily a discounted cash flow model.
There is a measurement period after the acquisition date during which the Company may adjust the amounts recognized for a business combination. Any such adjustments are recorded in the period the adjustment is determined with the corresponding offset to goodwill. These adjustments are typically based on obtaining additional information that existed at the acquisition date regarding the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. The measurement period ends once the Company has obtained all necessary information that existed as of the acquisition date, but does not extend beyond one year from the date of the acquisition. Once the measurement period has ended, any adjustments to assets acquired or liabilities assumed are recorded in income from continuing operations.
Regulatory accounting
The Company is subject to rate regulation by state public service commissions and/or the FERC. The Company's regulated businesses account for certain income and expense items under the provisions of regulatory accounting, which require these businesses to defer as regulatory assets or liabilities certain items that would have otherwise been reflected as expense or income, respectively, based on the expected regulatory treatment in future rates. Regulatory assets generally represent incurred or accrued costs that have been deferred and

52 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

are expected to be recovered in rates charged to customers. Regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are expected to be refunded to customers in future rates or amounts collected in current rates for future costs. Management continually assesses the likelihood of recovery in future rates of incurred costs and refunds to customers associated with regulatory assets and liabilities. The expected recovery or flowback of these deferred items generally is based on specific ratemaking decisions or precedent for each item. The Company believes that the accounting subject to rate regulation remains appropriate and its regulatory assets are probable of recovery in current rates or in future rate proceedings.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized whento depict the earnings process is complete, as evidenced by an agreement between the customer and the Company, when delivery has occurredtransfer of promised goods or services have been rendered, whento customers in an amount that reflects the fee is fixedconsideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or determinable and when collection is reasonably assured.services. The recognition of revenue requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenue. CriticalThe accuracy of revenues reported on the Consolidated Financial Statements depends on, among other things, management's estimates relatedof total costs to complete projects because the recognitionCompany uses the cost-to-cost measure of revenue include costsprogress on construction contracts underfor revenue recognition.
To determine the percentage-of-completion method.proper revenue recognition method for contracts, the Company evaluates whether two or more contracts should be combined and accounted for as one single contract and whether the combined or single contract should be accounted for as more than one performance obligation. This evaluation requires significant judgment and the decision to combine a group of contracts or separate the combined or single contract into multiple performance obligations could change the amount of revenue and profit recorded in a given period. For most contracts, the customer contracts with the Company to provide a significant service of integrating a complex set of tasks and components into a single project. Hence, the Company's contracts are generally accounted for as one performance obligation.
The Company recognizes construction contract revenue from fixed-price and modified fixed-price constructionover time using an input method based on the cost-to-cost measure of progress for contracts at its construction businesses usingbecause it best depicts the percentage-of-completion method, measured bytransfer of assets to the percentagecustomer which occurs as the Company incurs costs on the contract. Under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, the costs incurred are compared with total estimated costs of a performance obligation. Revenues are recorded proportionately to date to estimated totalthe costs for each contract.incurred. This method depends largely on the ability to make reasonably dependable estimates related to the extent of progress toward completion of the contract, contract revenues and contract costs. Inasmuch as contract prices are generally set before the work is performed, the estimates pertaining to every project could contain significant unknown risks such as volatile labor, material and fuel costs, weather delays, adverse project site conditions, unforeseen actions by regulatory agencies, performance by subcontractors, job management and relations with project owners. Changes in estimates could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company's total construction contract revenue was $2.8 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively.
Several factors are evaluated in determining the bid price for contract work. These include, but are not limited to, the complexities of the job, past history performing similar types of work, seasonal weather patterns, competition and market conditions, job site conditions, work force safety, reputation of the project owner, availability of labor, materials and fuel, project location and project completion dates. As a project commences, estimates are continually monitored and revised as information becomes available and actual costs and conditions surrounding the job become known. If a loss is anticipated on a contract, the loss is immediately recognized.
Contracts are often modified to account for changes in contract specifications and requirements. The Company considers contract modifications to exist when the modification either creates new or changes the existing enforceable rights and obligations. Generally, contract modifications are for goods or services that are not distinct from the existing contract due to the significant integration of services provided in the context of the contract and are accounted for as if they were part of that existing contract. The effect of a contract modification on the transaction price and the measure of progress for the performance obligation to which it relates, is recognized as an adjustment to revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis.
The Company's construction contracts generally contain variable consideration including liquidated damages, performance bonuses or incentives, claims, unapproved/unpriced change orders and penalties or index pricing. The variable amounts usually arise upon achievement of certain performance metrics or change in project scope. The Company estimates the amount of revenue to be recognized on variable consideration using estimation methods that best predict the most likely amount of consideration the Company expects to be entitled to or expects to incur. The Company includes variable consideration in the estimated transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur or when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved. Changes in circumstances could impact management's estimates made in determining the value of variable consideration recorded. The Company updates its estimate of the transaction price each reporting period and the effect of variable consideration on the transaction price is recognized as an adjustment to revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis.
The Company believes its estimates surrounding percentage-of-completion accountingthe cost-to-cost method are reasonable based on the information that is known when the estimates are made. The Company has contract administration, accounting and management control systems in place that allow its

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 53



Part II

estimates to be updated and monitored on a regular basis. Because of the many factors that are evaluated in determining bid prices, it is inherent that the Company's estimates have changed in the past and will continually change in the future as new information becomes available for each job. There were no material changes in contract estimates at the individual contract level in 2017.
Pension and other postretirement benefits
The Company has noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans for certain eligible employees. Various actuarial assumptions are used in calculating the benefit expense (income) and liability (asset) related to these plans. Costs of

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 47



Part II

providing pension and other postretirement benefits bear the risk of change, as they are dependent upon numerous factors based on assumptions of future conditions.
The Company makes various assumptions when determining plan costs, including the current discount rates and the expected long-term return on plan assets, the rate of compensation increases, actuarially determined mortality data and health care cost trend rates. In selecting the expected long-term return on plan assets, which is considered to be one of the key variables in determining benefit expense or income, the Company considers historical returns, current market conditions, the mix of investments and expected future market trends, including changes in interest rates and equity and bond market performance. Another key variable in determining benefit expense or income is the discount rate. In selecting the discount rate, the Company matches forecasted future cash flows of the pension and postretirement plans to a yield curve which consists of a hypothetical portfolio of high-quality corporate bonds with varying maturity dates, as well as other factors, as a basis. The Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets are primarily made up of equity and fixed-income investments. Fluctuations in actual equity and bond market returns, as well as changes in general interest rates, may result in increased or decreased pension and other postretirement benefit costs in the future. Management estimates the rate of compensation increase based on long-term assumed wage increases and the health care cost trend rates are determined by historical and future trends. The Company estimates that a 50 basis50-basis point decrease in the discount rate or in the expected return on plan assets would each increase expense by less than $1.5approximately $1.7 million (after tax)(after-tax) for the year ended December 31, 20172019.
The Company believes the estimates made for its pension and other postretirement benefits are reasonable based on the information that is known when the estimates are made. These estimates and assumptions are subject to a number of variables and are expected to change in the future. Estimates and assumptions will be affected by changes in the discount rate, the expected long-term return on plan assets, the rate of compensation increase and health care cost trend rates. The Company plans to continue to use its current methodologies to determine plan costs. For more information on the assumptions used in determining plan costs, see Item 8 - Note 14.17.
Income taxes
The Company is required to make judgments regarding the potential tax effects of various financial transactions and ongoing operations to estimate the Company's obligation to taxing authorities. These tax obligations include income, real estate, franchise and sales/use taxes. Judgments related to income taxes require the recognition in the Company's financial statements of a tax position that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained on audit.
Judgment and estimation is required in developing the provision for income taxes and the reporting of tax-related assets and liabilities and, if necessary, any valuation allowances. The interpretation of tax laws can involve uncertainty, since tax authorities may interpret such laws differently. Actual income tax could vary from estimated amounts and may result in favorable or unfavorable impacts to net income, cash flows, and tax-related assets and liabilities. In addition, the effective tax rate may be affected by other changes including the allocation of property, payroll and revenues between states.
The Company assesses the deferred tax assets for recoverability taking into consideration historical and anticipated earnings levels; the reversal of other existing temporary differences; available net operating losses and tax carryforwards; and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the deferred tax assets. Based on this assessment, management must evaluate the need for, and amount of, a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets. As facts and circumstances change, adjustment to the valuation allowance may be required.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The Business Segment Financial and Operating Data includes financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as another financial measure, adjusted gross margin, that is considered a non-GAAP financial measure as it relates to the Company's electric and natural gas distribution segments. The presentation of adjusted gross margin is intended to be a useful supplemental financial measure for investors’ understanding of the segments' operating performance. This non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, GAAP financial measures such as operating income (loss) or net income (loss). The Company's non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted gross margin, is not standardized; therefore, it may not be possible to compare this financial measure with other companies’ gross margin measures having the same or similar names.

54 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

In addition to operating revenues and operating expenses, management also uses the non-GAAP financial measure of adjusted gross margin when evaluating the results of operations for the electric and natural gas distribution segments. Adjusted gross margin for the electric and natural gas distribution segments is calculated by adding back adjustments to operating income (loss). These add-back adjustments include: operation and maintenance expense; depreciation, depletion and amortization expense; and certain taxes, other than income.
Adjusted gross margin includes operating revenues less the cost of electric fuel and purchased power, purchased natural gas sold and certain taxes, other than income. These taxes, other than income, included as a reduction to adjusted gross margin relate to revenue taxes. These segments pass on to their customers the increases and decreases in the wholesale cost of power purchases, natural gas and other fuel supply costs in accordance with regulatory requirements. As such, the segments' revenues are directly impacted by the fluctuations in such commodities. Revenue taxes, which are passed back to customers, fluctuate with revenues as they are calculated as a percentage of revenues. For these reasons, period over period, the segments' operating income (loss) is generally not impacted. The Company's management believes the adjusted gross margin is a useful supplemental financial measure as these items are included in both operating revenues and operating expenses. The Company's management also believes that adjusted gross margin and the remaining operating expenses that calculate operating income (loss) are useful in assessing the Company's utility performance as management has the ability to influence control over the remaining operating expenses.
The following information reconciles operating income to adjusted gross margin for the electric segment.
Years ended December 31,2019
2018
2017
 (In millions)
Operating income$64.0
$65.2
$79.9
Adjustments:   
Operating expenses: 
 
 
Operation and maintenance125.7
123.0
122.2
Depreciation, depletion and amortization58.7
51.0
47.7
Taxes, other than income16.1
14.5
13.5
Total adjustments200.5
188.5
183.4
Adjusted gross margin$264.5
$253.7
$263.3
The following information reconciles operating income to adjusted gross margin for the natural gas distribution segment.
Years ended December 31,2019
2018
2017
 (In millions)
Operating income$69.2
$72.3
$84.3
Adjustments:   
Operating expenses:   
Operation and maintenance185.0
173.4
164.3
Depreciation, depletion and amortization79.6
72.5
69.4
Taxes, other than income23.5
21.7
20.5
Total adjustments288.1
267.6
254.2
Adjusted gross margin$357.3
$339.9
$338.5
Effects of Inflation
Inflation did not have a significant effect on the Company's operations in 20172019, 20162018 or 20152017.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations associated with interest rates. The Company has policies and procedures to assist in controlling these market risks and from time to time has utilized derivatives to manage a portion of its risk.
Interest rate risk
The Company uses fixed and variable rate long-term debt to partially finance capital expenditures and mandatory debt retirements. These debt agreements expose the Company to market risk related to changes in interest rates. The Company manages this risk by taking advantage of market conditions when timing the placement of long-term financing. The Company from time to time has utilized interest rate

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 55



Part II

swap agreements to manage a portion of the Company's interest rate risk and may take advantage of such agreements in the future to minimize such risk. For additional information on the Company's long-term debt, see Item 8 - Notes 58 and 6.9.
At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company had no outstanding interest rate hedges.

48 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

The following table shows the amount of long-term debt, which excludes unamortized debt issuance costs and discount, and related weighted average interest rates, both by expected maturity dates, as of December 31, 20172019.
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total
Fair
Value

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total
Fair
Value

(Dollars in millions)(Dollars in millions)
Long-term debt:  
   
 
Fixed rate$148.5
$51.7
$15.7
$.7
$147.2
$1,211.0
$1,574.8
$1,680.6
$16.6
$1.5
$148.0
$77.9
$61.4
$1,632.8
$1,938.2
$2,113.7
Weighted average interest rate6.1%4.3%5.1%2.1%4.5%4.7%4.8%
4.8%1.1%4.5%3.7%4.2%4.6%4.5% 
Variable rate
$73.8
$57.3
$14.6


$145.7
$145.7
$
$
$
$
$312.0
$
$312.0
$312.0
Weighted average interest rate
1.7%3.7%1.9%

2.5%
%%%%2.7%%2.7% 

 
56 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K49



Part II
 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of MDU Resources Group, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company's financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172019. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).
Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 20172019.
The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172019, has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report.
/s/ David L. Goodin/s/ Jason L. Vollmer
  
  
David L. GoodinJason L. Vollmer
President and Chief Executive OfficerVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
  

 
50 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K57



Part II
 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MDU Resources Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172019, and the related notes and the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2018,21, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits includeincluded performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers-Construction Contract Revenue-Refer to Notes 1 and 2 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company recognizes construction contract revenue over time using an input method based on the cost-to-cost measure of progress as it best depicts the transfer of assets to the customer. Under this method of measuring progress, costs incurred are compared with total estimated costs of the performance obligation and revenues are recorded proportionately to the costs incurred. Ordinarily the Company’s contracts represent a single distinct performance obligation due to the highly interdependent and interrelated nature of the underlying goods or services. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized $2.8 billion of construction contract revenue.
Given the judgments necessary to estimate total costs and profit for the performance obligations used to recognize revenue for construction contracts, auditing such estimates required extensive audit effort due to the volume and complexity of construction contracts and a high degree of auditor judgment when performing audit procedures and evaluating the results of those procedures.

58 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to management’s estimates of total costs and profit for the performance obligations used to recognize revenue for certain construction contracts included the following, among others:
We evaluated the operating effectiveness of controls over construction contract revenue, including those over management’s estimation of total costs and profit for the performance obligations.
We developed an expectation of the amount of construction contract revenues based on prior year margins, and taking into account current year events, applied to the construction contract costs in the current year and compared our expectation to the amount of construction contract revenues recorded by management.
We selected a sample of construction contracts and performed the following:
Evaluated whether the contracts were properly included in management’s calculation of construction contract revenue based on the terms and conditions of each contract, including whether continuous transfer of control to the customer occurred as progress was made toward fulfilling the performance obligation.
Compared the transaction prices to the consideration expected to be received based on current rights and obligations under the contracts and any modifications that were agreed upon with the customers.
Evaluated management’s identification of distinct performance obligations by evaluating whether the underlying goods, services, or both were highly interdependent and interrelated.
Tested the accuracy and completeness of the costs incurred to date for the performance obligation.
Evaluated the estimates of total cost and profit for the performance obligation by:
Observing the work sites and inspecting the progress to completion.
Comparing costs incurred to date to the costs management estimated to be incurred to date.
Evaluating management’s ability to achieve the estimates of total cost and profit by performing corroborating inquiries with the Company’s project managers and engineers, and comparing the estimates to management’s work plans, engineering specifications, and supplier contracts.
Comparing management’s estimates for the selected contracts to costs and profits of similar performance obligations, when applicable.
Tested the mathematical accuracy of management’s calculation of construction contract revenue for the performance obligation.
We evaluated management’s ability to estimate total costs and profits accurately by comparing actual costs and profits to management’s historical estimates for performance obligations that have been fulfilled.
Regulatory Matters-Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements-Refer to Notes 1 and 19 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
Through the Company’s regulated utility businesses, it provides electric and natural gas services to customers, and generates, transmits, and distributes electricity. The Company is subject to rate regulation by federal and state utility regulatory agencies (collectively, the “Commissions”), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas distribution companies in states where the Company operates. The Company’s regulated utility businesses account for certain income and expense items under the provisions of regulatory accounting, which requires these businesses to defer as regulatory assets or liabilities certain items that would have otherwise been reflected as expense or income, respectively, based on the expected regulatory treatment in future rates. The expected recovery or flowback of these deferred items generally is based on specific ratemaking decisions or precedent for each item.
Rates are determined and approved in regulatory proceedings based on an analysis of the Company’s costs to provide utility service and a return on the Company’s investment in the regulated utility businesses. Regulatory decisions can have an impact on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. The regulation of rates is premised on the full recovery of prudently incurred costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital. Decisions to be made by the Commissions in the future will impact the accounting for regulated operations.
Accounting for the economics of rate regulation impacts multiple financial statement line items and disclosures, such as property, plant, and equipment; regulatory assets and liabilities; operating revenues; operation and maintenance expense; and depreciation expense. We identified the impact of rate regulation as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about impacted account balances and disclosures and the degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of future regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs and (2) refunds to customers. Given management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments requires specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation due to its inherent complexities.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 59



Part II

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We tested the design and operating effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of (1) the recovery in future rates of costs incurred as property, plant, and equipment and deferred as regulatory assets; and (2) a refund or a future reduction in rates that should be reported as regulatory liabilities. We tested management’s controls over the initial recognition of amounts as regulatory assets or liabilities; and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates or of a future reduction in rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions for the Company and other public utilities in the Company’s significant jurisdictions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedence of the treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared to management’s recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
We obtained an analysis from management regarding probability of recovery for regulatory assets or refund or future reduction in rates for regulatory liabilities not yet addressed in a regulatory order to assess management’s assertion that amounts are probable of recovery, or that a future reduction in rates is not likely.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
 
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 23, 201821, 2020
 
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

 
60 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K51



Part II
 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of MDU Resources Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20172019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, of the Company and our report dated February 23, 2018,21, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
 
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 23, 201821, 2020
 


 
52MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 61



Part II

Consolidated Statements of Income
Years ended December 31,2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating revenues:   
Electric, natural gas distribution and regulated pipeline and midstream$1,279,304
$1,213,227
$1,244,759
Nonregulated pipeline and midstream, construction materials and contracting, construction services and other
4,057,472
3,318,325
3,198,592
Total operating revenues5,336,776
4,531,552
4,443,351
Operating expenses: 
 
 
Operation and maintenance:  
 
Electric, natural gas distribution and regulated pipeline and midstream356,132
340,331
326,687
Nonregulated pipeline and midstream, construction materials and contracting, construction services and other3,539,162
2,915,790
2,808,779
Total operation and maintenance3,895,294
3,256,121
3,135,466
Purchased natural gas sold421,545
404,153
430,954
Depreciation, depletion and amortization256,017
220,205
207,486
Taxes, other than income196,143
168,638
166,673
Electric fuel and purchased power86,557
80,712
78,724
Total operating expenses4,855,556
4,129,829
4,019,303
Operating income481,220
401,723
424,048
Other income (expense)15,812
(238)8,767
Interest expense98,587
84,614
82,788
Income before income taxes398,445
316,871
350,027
Income taxes63,279
47,485
65,041
Income from continuing operations335,166
269,386
284,986
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax287
2,932
(3,783)
Net income335,453
272,318
281,203
Loss on redemption of preferred stock

600
Dividends declared on preferred stock

171
Earnings on common stock$335,453
$272,318
$280,432
Earnings per common share - basic: 
 
 
Earnings before discontinued operations$1.69
$1.38
$1.46
Discontinued operations, net of tax
.01
(.02)
Earnings per common share - basic$1.69
$1.39
$1.44
Earnings per common share - diluted: 
 
 
Earnings before discontinued operations$1.69
$1.38
$1.45
Discontinued operations, net of tax
.01
(.02)
Earnings per common share - diluted$1.69
$1.39
$1.43
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic198,612
195,720
195,304
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted198,626
196,150
195,687
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

62 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating revenues:   
Electric, natural gas distribution and regulated pipeline and midstream$1,244,759
$1,141,454
$1,149,038
Nonregulated pipeline and midstream, construction materials and contracting, construction services and other
3,198,592
2,987,374
2,865,014
Total operating revenues4,443,351
4,128,828
4,014,052
Operating expenses: 
 
 
Operation and maintenance:  
 
Electric, natural gas distribution and regulated pipeline and midstream323,120
312,404
278,171
Nonregulated pipeline and midstream, construction materials and contracting, construction services and other2,807,682
2,580,895
2,527,052
Total operation and maintenance3,130,802
2,893,299
2,805,223
Purchased natural gas sold430,954
382,753
450,114
Depreciation, depletion and amortization207,486
216,318
211,747
Taxes, other than income166,673
151,826
140,955
Electric fuel and purchased power78,724
75,512
86,238
Total operating expenses4,014,639
3,719,708
3,694,277
Operating income428,712
409,120
319,775
Other income4,103
4,956
18,457
Interest expense82,788
87,848
91,179
Income before income taxes350,027
326,228
247,053
Income taxes65,041
93,132
70,664
Income from continuing operations284,986
233,096
176,389
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax (Note 2)(3,783)(300,354)(834,080)
Net income (loss)281,203
(67,258)(657,691)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest (Note 2)
(131,691)(35,256)
Loss on redemption of preferred stocks (Note 8)600


Dividends declared on preferred stocks171
685
685
Earnings (loss) on common stock$280,432
$63,748
$(623,120)
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic: 
 
 
Earnings before discontinued operations$1.46
$1.19
$.90
Discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax(.02)(.86)(4.10)
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic$1.44
$.33
$(3.20)
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted: 
 
 
Earnings before discontinued operations$1.45
$1.19
$.90
Discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax(.02)(.86)(4.10)
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted$1.43
$.33
$(3.20)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic195,304
195,299
194,928
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted195,687
195,618
194,986
Years ended December 31,2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
Net income$335,453
$272,318
$281,203
Other comprehensive income (loss):   
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments included in net income, net of tax of $(140), $429 and $224 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively731
162
366
Postretirement liability adjustment:   
Postretirement liability gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax of $(2,012), $1,471 and $(1,162) in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively(6,151)4,441
(1,812)
Amortization of postretirement liability losses included in net periodic benefit cost, net of tax of $476, $721 and $645 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively1,486
2,173
1,013
Reclassification of postretirement liability adjustment from regulatory asset, net of tax of $0, $0 and $(876) in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively

(1,143)
Postretirement liability adjustment(4,665)6,614
(1,942)
Foreign currency translation adjustment:   
Foreign currency translation adjustment recognized during the period, net of tax of $0, $(14) and $(3) in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively
(61)(6)
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation adjustment included in net income, net of tax of $0, $75 and $0 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively
249

Foreign currency translation adjustment
188
(6)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments:   
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments arising during the period, net of tax of $35, $(38) and $(75) in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively134
(144)(139)
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale investments included in net income, net of tax of $10, $35 and $65 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively40
131
120
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments174
(13)(19)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(3,760)6,951
(1,601)
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$331,693
$279,269
$279,602
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 63



Part II

Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,2019
2018
(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts) 
Assets  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$66,459
$53,948
Receivables, net836,605
722,945
Inventories278,407
287,309
Prepayments and other current assets115,805
119,500
Current assets held for sale425
430
Total current assets1,297,701
1,184,132
Investments148,656
138,620
Property, plant and equipment7,908,628
7,397,321
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization2,991,486
2,818,644
Net property, plant and equipment4,917,142
4,578,677
Deferred charges and other assets: 
 
Goodwill681,358
664,922
Other intangible assets, net15,246
10,815
Operating lease right-of-use assets115,323

Other506,207
408,857
Noncurrent assets held for sale1,426
2,087
Total deferred charges and other assets1,319,560
1,086,681
Total assets$7,683,059
$6,988,110
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity 
 
Current liabilities: 
 
Long-term debt due within one year$16,540
$251,854
Accounts payable403,391
358,505
Taxes payable48,970
41,929
Dividends payable41,580
39,695
Accrued compensation99,269
69,007
Current operating lease liabilities31,664

Other accrued liabilities221,502
221,059
Current liabilities held for sale3,511
4,001
Total current liabilities866,427
986,050
Long-term debt2,226,567
1,856,841
Deferred credits and other liabilities: 
 
Deferred income taxes506,583
430,085
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities83,742

Other1,152,494
1,148,359
Total deferred credits and other liabilities1,742,819
1,578,444
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)




Stockholders' equity: 
 
Common stock  
Authorized - 500,000,000 shares, $1.00 par value
Shares issued - 200,922,790 at December 31, 2019 and 196,564,907 at December 31, 2018
200,923
196,565
Other paid-in capital1,355,404
1,248,576
Retained earnings1,336,647
1,163,602
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(42,102)(38,342)
Treasury stock at cost - 538,921 shares(3,626)(3,626)
Total stockholders' equity2,847,246
2,566,775
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$7,683,059
$6,988,110
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

64 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Consolidated Statements of Equity
Years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017      
      
Other
Paid-in Capital

Retained Earnings
Accumu-lated
Other Compre-hensive Loss

   
  Preferred Stock Common StockTreasury Stock 
 Shares
Amount
 Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Total
 (In thousands, except shares)
At December 31, 2016150,000
$15,000
 195,843,297
$195,843
$1,232,478
$912,282
$(35,733)(538,921)$(3,626)$2,316,244
Net income

 


281,203



281,203
Other comprehensive loss

 



(1,601)

(1,601)
Dividends declared on preferred stock

 


(171)


(171)
Dividends declared on common stock

 


(151,966)


(151,966)
Stock-based compensation

 

3,375




3,375
Repurchase of common stock

 




(64,384)(1,684)(1,684)
Issuance of common stock upon vesting of stock-based compensation,
net of shares used for
tax withholdings


 

(2,441)

64,384
1,684
(757)
Redemption of preferred stock(150,000)(15,000) 


(600)


(15,600)
At December 31, 2017

 195,843,297
195,843
1,233,412
1,040,748
(37,334)(538,921)(3,626)2,429,043
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2014-09

 


(970)


(970)
Adjusted balance at January 1, 2018

 195,843,297
195,843
1,233,412
1,039,778
(37,334)(538,921)(3,626)2,428,073
Net income

 


272,318



272,318
Other comprehensive income

 



6,951


6,951
Reclassification of certain prior period tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive loss

 


7,959
(7,959)


Dividends declared on common stock

 


(156,453)


(156,453)
Stock-based compensation

 

5,060




5,060
Repurchase of common stock

 




(182,424)(5,020)(5,020)
Issuance of common stock upon vesting of stock-based compensation,
net of shares used for
tax withholdings


 

(7,350)

182,424
5,020
(2,330)
Issuance of common stock

 721,610
722
17,454




18,176
At December 31, 2018

 196,564,907
196,565
1,248,576
1,163,602
(38,342)(538,921)(3,626)2,566,775
Net income

 


335,453



335,453
Other comprehensive loss

 



(3,760)

(3,760)
Dividends declared on common stock

 


(162,408)


(162,408)
Stock-based compensation

 

7,353




7,353
Issuance of common stock upon vesting of stock-based compensation,
net of shares used for
tax withholdings


 246,214
246
(3,261)



(3,015)
Issuance of common stock

 4,111,669
4,112
102,736




106,848
At December 31, 2019
$
 200,922,790
$200,923
$1,355,404
$1,336,647
$(42,102)(538,921)$(3,626)$2,847,246
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 53



Part II

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
 (In thousands)
Net income (loss)$281,203
$(67,258)$(657,691)
Other comprehensive income (loss):   
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments included in net income (loss), net of tax of $224, $226 and $233 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively366
367
404
Postretirement liability adjustment:   
Postretirement liability losses arising during the period, net of tax of $(1,162), $(836) and $(55) in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively(1,812)(1,470)(88)
Amortization of postretirement liability losses included in net periodic benefit cost (credit), net of tax of $645, $1,425 and $1,128 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively1,013
2,506
1,794
Reclassification of postretirement liability adjustment (from) to regulatory asset, net of tax of $(876), $0 and $1,416 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively(1,143)
2,255
Postretirement liability adjustment(1,942)1,036
3,961
Foreign currency translation adjustment:   
Foreign currency translation adjustment recognized during the period, net of tax of $(3), $31 and $(105) in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively(6)51
(173)
Reclassification adjustment for loss on foreign currency translation adjustment included in net income (loss), net of tax of $0, $0 and $490 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively

802
Foreign currency translation adjustment(6)51
629
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments:   
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments arising during the period, net of tax of $(75), $(98) and $(91) in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively(139)(182)(170)
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale investments included in net income (loss), net of tax of $65, $77 and $70 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively120
143
131
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments(19)(39)(39)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(1,601)1,415
4,955
Comprehensive income (loss)279,602
(65,843)(652,736)
Comprehensive loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
(131,691)(35,256)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$279,602
$65,848
$(617,480)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



54 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,2017
2016
(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts) 
Assets  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$34,599
$46,107
Receivables, net727,030
630,243
Inventories226,583
238,273
Prepayments and other current assets81,304
48,461
Current assets held for sale479
14,391
Total current assets1,069,995
977,475
Investments137,613
125,866
Property, plant and equipment (Note 1)6,770,829
6,510,229
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization2,691,641
2,578,902
Net property, plant and equipment4,079,188
3,931,327
Deferred charges and other assets: 
 
Goodwill (Note 3)631,791
631,791
Other intangible assets, net (Note 3)3,837
5,925
Other407,850
415,419
Noncurrent assets held for sale4,392
196,664
Total deferred charges and other assets1,047,870
1,249,799
Total assets$6,334,666
$6,284,467
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity 
 
Current liabilities: 
 
Long-term debt due within one year$148,499
$43,598
Accounts payable312,327
279,962
Taxes payable42,537
48,164
Dividends payable38,573
37,767
Accrued compensation72,919
65,867
Other accrued liabilities186,010
184,377
Current liabilities held for sale11,993
9,924
Total current liabilities812,858
669,659
Long-term debt (Note 6)1,566,354
1,746,561
Deferred credits and other liabilities: 
 
Deferred income taxes347,271
668,226
Other1,179,140
883,777
Total deferred credits and other liabilities1,526,411
1,552,003
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 14, 16 and 17)




Stockholders' equity: 
 
Preferred stocks (Note 8)
15,000
Common stockholders' equity: 
 
Common stock (Note 9)
Authorized - 500,000,000 shares, $1.00 par value
Issued - 195,843,297 shares in 2017 and 2016
195,843
195,843
Other paid-in capital1,233,412
1,232,478
Retained earnings1,040,748
912,282
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(37,334)(35,733)
Treasury stock at cost - 538,921 shares(3,626)(3,626)
Total common stockholders' equity2,429,043
2,301,244
Total stockholders' equity2,429,043
2,316,244
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$6,334,666
$6,284,467
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 55



Part II

Consolidated Statements of Equity
Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015       
      
Other
Paid-in Capital

Retained Earnings
Accumu-lated
Other Compre-hensive Loss

  Noncon-trolling Interest
 
  Preferred Stock Common StockTreasury Stock 
 Shares
Amount
 Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Total
 (In thousands, except shares)
Balance at            
December 31, 2014150,000
$15,000
 194,754,812
$194,755
$1,207,188
$1,762,827
$(42,103)(538,921)$(3,626)$115,743
$3,249,784
Net loss

 


(622,435)


(35,256)(657,691)
Other comprehensive income

 



4,955



4,955
Dividends declared on preferred stocks

 


(685)



(685)
Dividends declared on common stock

 


(143,352)



(143,352)
Stock-based compensation

 

3,689





3,689
Net tax deficit on stock-based compensation

 

(1,606)




(1,606)
Issuance of common stock

 1,049,853
1,050
20,848





21,898
Contribution from non-controlling interest

 






52,000
52,000
Distribution to non-controlling interest

 






(8,444)(8,444)
Balance at            
December 31, 2015150,000
15,000
 195,804,665
195,805
1,230,119
996,355
(37,148)(538,921)(3,626)124,043
2,520,548
Net income (loss)

 


64,433



(131,691)(67,258)
Other comprehensive income

 



1,415



1,415
Dividends declared on preferred stocks

 


(685)



(685)
Dividends declared on common stock

 


(147,821)



(147,821)
Stock-based compensation

 

4,383





4,383
Net tax deficit on stock-based compensation

 

(1,663)




(1,663)
Issuance of common stock upon vesting of stock-based compensation,
net of shares used for
tax withholdings


 38,632
38
(361)




(323)
Contribution from non-controlling interest

 






7,648
7,648
Balance at            
December 31, 2016150,000
15,000
 195,843,297
195,843
1,232,478
912,282
(35,733)(538,921)(3,626)
2,316,244
Net income

 


281,203




281,203
Other comprehensive loss

 



(1,601)


(1,601)
Dividends declared on preferred stocks

 


(171)



(171)
Dividends declared on common stock

 


(151,966)



(151,966)
Stock-based compensation

 

3,375





3,375
Repurchase of common stock

 




(64,384)(1,684)
(1,684)
Issuance of common stock upon vesting of stock-based compensation,
net of shares used for
tax withholdings


 

(2,441)

64,384
1,684

(757)
Redemption of preferred stock(150,000)(15,000) 


(600)



(15,600)
Balance at            
December 31, 2017
$
 195,843,297
$195,843
$1,233,412
$1,040,748
$(37,334)(538,921)$(3,626)$
$2,429,043
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

56 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K65



Part II
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Operating activities:  
Net income (loss)$281,203
$(67,258)$(657,691)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(3,783)(300,354)(834,080)
Net income$335,453
$272,318
$281,203
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax287
2,932
(3,783)
Income from continuing operations284,986
233,096
176,389
335,166
269,386
284,986
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: 
 
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
 
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization207,486
216,318
211,747
256,017
220,205
207,486
Deferred income taxes(25,423)(2,049)(25,356)63,415
59,735
(25,423)
Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: 
 
 
 
 
 
Receivables(108,255)(25,641)4,704
(104,374)28,234
(108,255)
Inventories9,135
2,433
2,265
9,331
(46,796)9,135
Other current assets(30,588)(17,925)60,182
(38,283)(31,814)(30,588)
Accounts payable26,013
7,039
37,224
30,079
21,109
26,013
Other current liabilities4,648
36,146
6,864
51,278
22,285
4,648
Other noncurrent changes(18,790)(26,459)(10,240)(60,813)(38,521)(18,790)
Net cash provided by continuing operations349,212
422,958
463,779
541,816
503,823
349,212
Net cash provided by discontinued operations98,799
39,251
198,053
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations464
(3,942)98,799
Net cash provided by operating activities448,011
462,209
661,832
542,280
499,881
448,011
Investing activities: 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures(341,382)(388,183)(536,832)(576,065)(568,230)(341,382)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(55,597)(167,692)
Net proceeds from sale or disposition of property and other126,588
44,826
54,569
29,812
26,100
126,588
Investments(1,608)(1,396)1,515
(2,011)(2,321)(1,608)
Net cash used in continuing operations(216,402)(344,753)(480,748)(603,861)(712,143)(216,402)
Net cash provided by discontinued operations2,234
39,658
98,295

1,236
2,234
Net cash used in investing activities(214,168)(305,095)(382,453)(603,861)(710,907)(214,168)
Financing activities: 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of short-term borrowings169,977


Repayment of short-term borrowings(170,000)

Issuance of long-term debt140,812
309,064
345,920
599,455
566,829
140,812
Repayment of long-term debt(217,394)(315,647)(566,498)(468,917)(174,520)(217,394)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock

21,898
106,848


Payments of stock issuance costs
(10)
Dividends paid(150,727)(147,156)(142,835)(160,256)(154,573)(150,727)
Redemption of preferred stock(15,600)



(15,600)
Repurchase of common stock(1,684)


(5,020)(1,684)
Tax withholding on stock-based compensation(757)(323)
(3,015)(2,330)(757)
Net cash used in continuing operations(245,350)(154,062)(341,515)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations
(40,852)85,785
Net cash used in financing activities(245,350)(194,914)(255,730)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities74,092
230,376
(245,350)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(1)4
(225)
(1)(1)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(11,508)(37,796)23,424
12,511
19,349
(11,508)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year46,107
83,903
60,479
53,948
34,599
46,107
Cash and cash equivalents - end of year$34,599
$46,107
$83,903
$66,459
$53,948
$34,599
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
66 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K57



Part II
 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation
The abbreviations and acronyms used throughout are defined following the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the following businesses: electric, natural gas distribution, pipeline and midstream, construction materials and contracting, construction services and other. The electric and natural gas distribution businesses, as well as a portion of the pipeline and midstream business, are regulated. Construction materials and contracting, construction services and the other businesses, as well as a portion of the pipeline and midstream business, are nonregulated. For further descriptions of the Company's businesses, see Note 13.16. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation, except for certain transactions related to the Company's regulated operations in accordance with GAAP. The statements also include the ownership interests in the assets, liabilities and expenses of jointly owned electric generating facilities.
The Company's regulated businesses are subject to various state and federal agency regulations. The accounting policies followed by these businesses are generally subject to the Uniform System of Accounts of the FERC. These accounting policies differ in some respects from those used by the Company's nonregulated businesses.
The Company's regulated businesses account for certain income and expense items under the provisions of regulatory accounting, which requires these businesses to defer as regulatory assets or liabilities certain items that would have otherwise been reflected as expense or income, respectively, based on the expected regulatory treatment in future rates. The expected recovery or flowback of these deferred items generally is based on specific ratemaking decisions or precedent for each item. Regulatory assets and liabilities are being amortized consistently with the regulatory treatment established by the FERC and the applicable state public service commissions. See Note 47 for more information regarding the nature and amounts of these regulatory deferrals.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense is reported separately onOn January 2, 2019, the Consolidated StatementsCompany announced the completion of Income and therefore is excluded fromthe Holding Company Reorganization, which resulted in Montana-Dakota becoming a subsidiary of the Company. The purpose of the reorganization was to make the public utility division into a subsidiary of the holding company, just as the other line items within operating expenses.
Management has also evaluated the impact of events occurring after December 31, 2017, up to the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements.companies are wholly owned subsidiaries.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the TCJA which includes lower corporate tax rates, repealing the domestic production deduction, disallowance of immediate expensing for regulated utility property and modifying or repealing many other business deductions and credits. In accordance withThe reduction in the accounting guidancecorporate tax rate was effective on accounting for income taxes, entities must account for theJanuary 1, 2018. The effects of the change in tax laws or rates must be accounted for in the period of enactment. Inenactment, which resulted in the Company making reasonable estimates of the impact of the reduction in corporate tax rate on the Company's net deferred tax liabilities during the fourth quarter of 2017. The SEC issued rules that allowed for a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date of the TCJA to finalize the recording of the related tax impacts. At December 31, 2018, the Company finalized the estimates from the fourth quarter of 2017 and no material adjustments were recorded to income from continuing operations during the period of enactment, the Company performed a one-time revaluation of the net deferred tax liabilities to account for the reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent effective January 1, 2018. For more information on the impacts of the TCJA on the yeartwelve months ended December 31, 2017, see Notes 4 and 11. The2018.
Effective January 1, 2019, the Company is currently reviewingadopted the componentsrequirements of the TCJAASU on leases, as further discussed in this note, as well as in Note 5. As such, results for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2019, are presented under the new guidance, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and evaluatingcontinue to be reported in accordance with the impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosureshistoric accounting for 2018 and thereafter.
As part of the Company's strategic plan to grow its capital investments while focusing on creating a greater long-term value and reducing the Company's risk by decreasing exposure to commodity prices, the Company completed the sales of substantially all of Fidelity's oil and and natural gas assets between October 2015 and April 2016 and Dakota Prairie Refining on June 27, 2016.leases.
The assets and liabilities for the Company's discontinued operations have been classified as held for sale and the results of operations are shown in lossincome (loss) from discontinued operations, other than certain general and administrative costs and interest expense which do not meet the criteria for income (loss) from discontinued operations. At the time the assets were classified as held for sale, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense was no longer recorded. Unless otherwise indicated, the amounts presented in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements relate to the Company's continuing operations. For more information on the Company's discontinued operations, see Note 2.4.
Management has also evaluated the impact of events occurring after December 31, 2019, up to the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. For more information on the Company's subsequent events, see Note 21.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable consists primarily of trade receivables from the sale of goods and services which are recorded at the invoiced amount net of allowance for doubtful accounts, and costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts. For momore

 
58 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K67



Part II
 

re information, see Percentage-of-completion method in this note.Note 2. The total balance of receivables past due 90 days or more was $34.7$46.7 million and $29.2$30.0 million at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, respectively.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through a review of past due balances and other specific account data. Account balances are written off when management determines the amounts to be uncollectible. The Company's allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, was $8.1$8.5 million and $10.5$8.9 million, respectively.
Accounts receivable also consists of accrued unbilled revenue representing revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. Accrued unbilled revenue at MDU Energy Capital was $100.8 million and $96.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Amounts representing balances billed but not paid by customers under retainage provisions in contracts at December 31 were as follows:
 2019
2018
 (In thousands)
Short-term retainage*$75,590
$56,228
Long-term retainage**14,228
4,152
Total retainage$89,818
$60,380
*Expected to be paid within one year or less and included in receivables, net.
**Included in deferred charges and other assets - other.
Inventories and natural gas in storage
Natural gas in storage for the Company's regulated operations is generally carriedvalued at lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out method or lower of cost or net realizable value using the average cost or first-in, first-out method. The majority of all other inventories are valued at lower of cost or net realizable value or cost using the last-in, first-outaverage cost method. All other inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The portion of the cost of natural gas in storage expected to be used within one year12 months was included in inventories. Inventories at December 31 consisted of:
2017
2016
2019
2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Aggregates held for resale$115,268
$115,471
$147,723
$139,681
Asphalt oil30,360
29,103
41,912
54,741
Natural gas in storage (current)20,950
25,761
Materials and supplies18,650
18,372
22,512
23,611
Merchandise for resale14,905
16,437
22,232
22,552
Natural gas in storage (current)22,058
22,117
Other26,450
33,129
21,970
24,607
Total$226,583
$238,273
$278,407
$287,309

The remainder of natural gas in storage, which largely represents the cost of gas required to maintain pressure levels for normal operating purposes, was included in deferred charges and other assets - other and was $49.3$48.4 million and $49.5$48.5 million at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, respectively.
Investments
The Company's investments include the cash surrender value of life insurance policies, an insurance contract, mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury securities. The Company measures its investment in the insurance contract at fair value with any unrealized gains and losses recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company has not elected the fair value option for its mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury securities and, as a result, the unrealized gains and losses on these investments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). For more information, see Notes 58 and 14.17.

68 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Property, plant and equipment
Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. When regulated assets are retired, or otherwise disposed of in the ordinary course of business, the original cost of the asset is charged to accumulated depreciation. With respect to the retirement or disposal of all other assets, the resulting gains or losses are recognized as a component of income. The Company is permitted to capitalize AFUDC on regulated construction projects and to include such amounts in rate base when the related facilities are placed in service. In addition, the Company capitalizes interest, when applicable, on certain construction projects associated with its other operations. The amount of AFUDC and interest capitalized for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
 (In thousands)
Interest capitalized$
$
$4,381
AFUDC - borrowed$966
$914
$4,907
$2,807
$2,290
$966
AFUDC - equity$909
$565
$7,971
$698
$1,897
$909

Generally, property, plant and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the average useful lives of the assets, except for depletable aggregate reserves, which are depleted based on the units-of-production method. The Company collects removal costs for plant assets in regulated utility rates. These amounts are recorded as regulatory liabilities, which are included in deferred credits and other liabilities - other.

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 5969



Part II
 

Property, plant and equipment at December 31 was as follows:
2017
2016
Weighted
Average
Depreciable
Life in Years

2019
2018
Weighted
Average
Depreciable
Life in Years

(Dollars in thousands, where applicable)(Dollars in thousands, where applicable)
Regulated:    
Electric:    
Generation$1,034,765
$1,036,373
39
$1,139,059
$1,131,484
48
Distribution415,543
398,382
44
443,780
430,750
46
Transmission296,941
284,048
57
445,485
302,315
65
Construction in progress117,906
62,212

66,664
161,893

Other117,109
107,598
15
132,157
122,127
15
Natural gas distribution:    
Distribution1,831,795
1,718,633
47
2,133,249
1,981,356
47
Construction in progress19,823
19,934

39,506
21,028

Other468,227
440,846
18
515,368
496,708
17
Pipeline and midstream:    
Transmission516,932
490,143
53
636,796
585,594
46
Gathering37,837
37,831
20
35,661
37,829
20
Storage45,629
45,350
62
50,001
49,101
53
Construction in progress17,488
16,507

22,597
5,915

Other41,054
40,873
33
48,340
45,763
16
Nonregulated:    
Pipeline and midstream:    
Gathering and processing31,678
31,682
19
31,148
31,094
19
Construction in progress17
13

154
86

Other9,649
9,800
10
9,518
9,577
10
Construction materials and contracting:    
Land95,745
94,625

127,729
109,541

Buildings and improvements102,435
102,347
20
122,064
114,905
20
Machinery, vehicles and equipment947,979
930,471
12
1,180,343
1,090,790
12
Construction in progress7,750
16,181

25,018
22,507

Aggregate reserves406,139
405,751
*
455,408
430,263
*
Construction services:    
Land5,216
5,346

7,146
5,216

Buildings and improvements27,351
26,693
25
31,735
29,795
24
Machinery, vehicles and equipment137,924
132,217
6
156,537
145,859
6
Other6,774
7,105
4
17,952
7,716
2
Other:    
Land2,837
2,837

2,648
2,648

Other28,286
46,431
19
32,565
25,461
14
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization2,691,641
2,578,902
 2,991,486
2,818,644
 
Net property, plant and equipment$4,079,188
$3,931,327
 $4,917,142
$4,578,677
 

*Depleted on the units-of-production method based on recoverable aggregate reserves.
 

Impairment of long-lived assets
The Company reviews the carrying values of its long-lived assets, excluding goodwill and assets held for sale, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets, compared to the carrying value of the assets. If impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. InThe impairments are recorded in operation and maintenance expense on the third quarterConsolidated Statements of 2015,Income.
No significant impairment losses were recorded in 2019, 2018 or 2017. Unforeseen events and changes in circumstances could require the Company recognized anrecognition of impairment of $14.1 million (before tax), largely related to the sale of certain non-strategic natural gas gathering assets that were written down to their estimated fair value that was determined using the market approach. In the second quarter of 2015, the Company recognized an impairment of $3.0 million (before tax) related to coalbed natural gas gathering assets located in Wyoming where there had been continued decline in natural gas development and production activity due to low natural gas prices. The coalbed natural gas gathering assets werelosses at some future date.

 
6070 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

written down toLeases
Lease liabilities and their estimated fair value that was determined using the income approach. The impairmentscorresponding right-of-use assets are recorded in operation and maintenance expensebased on the Consolidated Statementspresent value of Income. For more informationlease payments over the expected lease term. The Company recognizes leases with an original lease term of 12 months or less in income on these nonrecurring faira straight-line basis over the term of the lease and does not recognize a corresponding right-of-use asset or lease liability. The Company determines the lease term based on the non-cancelable and cancelable periods in each contract. The non-cancelable period consists of the term of the contract that is legally enforceable and cannot be canceled by either party without incurring a significant penalty. The cancelable period is determined by various factors that are based on who has the right to cancel a contract. If only the lessor has the right to cancel the contract, the Company will assume the contract will continue. If the lessee is the only party that has the right to cancel the contract, the Company looks to asset, entity and market-based factors. If both the lessor and the lessee have the right to cancel the contract, the Company assumes the contract will not continue.
The discount rate used to calculate the present value measurements, see Note 5.
No significant impairment losses were recorded in 2016of the lease liabilities is based upon the implied rate within each contract. If the rate is unknown or 2017, other than those related tocannot be determined, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate, which is determined by the length of the contract, asset class and the Company's borrowing rates, as of the commencement date of the contract.
Regulatory assets heldand liabilities
The Company's regulated businesses account for salecertain income and discontinued operations. For more information regardingexpense items under the provisions of regulatory accounting, which requires these impairments, see Note 2.
Unforeseen events and changesbusinesses to defer as regulatory assets or liabilities certain items that would have otherwise been reflected as expense or income. The Company records regulatory assets or liabilities at the time the Company determines the amounts to be recoverable in circumstances could require the recognition of impairment losses at somecurrent or future date.rates.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment annually, which is completedthe Company completes in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process performed at the reporting unit level. The Company has determined that the reporting units for its goodwill impairment test are its operating segments, or components of an operating segment, that constitute a business for which discrete financial information is available and for which segment management regularly reviews the operating results. For more information on the Company's operating segments, see Note 13. The first step of the16. Goodwill impairment, test involvesif any, is measured by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, the testgoodwill of the reporting unit is complete and no impairment is recorded.not impaired. If the faircarrying value of a reporting unit is less thanexceeds its fair value, the Company must record an impairment loss for the amount that the carrying value step two of the test is performed to determinereporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds the amount of impairment loss, if any. The impairment is computed by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill to the carrying value of that goodwill. If the carrying value is greater than the implied fair value, an impairment loss must be recorded.unit. For the years ended December 31, 20172019, 20162018 and 20152017, there were no significant impairment losses recorded. At December 31, 20172019, the fair value substantially exceeded the carrying value at all reporting units.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires judgment and the use of significant estimates which include assumptions about the Company's future revenue, profitability and cash flows, amount and timing of estimated capital expenditures, inflation rates, weighted averagerisk adjusted capital cost, of capital, operational plans, and current and future economic conditions, among others. The fair value of each reporting unit is determined using a weighted combination of income and market approaches. The Company uses a discounted cash flow methodology for its income approach. Under the income approach, the discounted cash flow model determines fair value based on the present value of projected cash flows over a specified period and a residual value related to future cash flows beyond the projection period. Both values are discounted using a rate which reflects the best estimate of the weighted averagerisk adjusted capital cost of capital at each reporting unit. The weighted averageRisk adjusted capital cost, of capital, which varies by reporting unit and iswas in the range of 54 percent to 9 percent and a long-term growth rate projection of approximately 3 percent werewas utilized in the goodwill impairment test performed in the fourth quarter of 2017.2019. The goodwill impairment test also utilizes a long-term growth rate projection, which varies by reporting unit and was in the range of approximately 2 percent to 3 percent in the goodwill impairment test performed in the fourth quarter of 2019. Under the market approach, the Company estimates fair value using various multiples derived from comparable sales transactions and enterprise value to EBITDA for comparative peer companies for each respective reporting unit. These multiples are applied to operating data for each reporting unit to arrive at an indication of fair value. In addition, the Company adds a reasonable control premium when calculating the fair value utilizing the peer multiples, which is estimated as the premium that would be received in a sale in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Company believes that the estimates and assumptions used in its impairment assessments are reasonable and based on available market information.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized when the earnings processa performance obligation is complete, as evidencedsatisfied by an agreement between thetransferring control over a product or service to a customer. Revenue is measured based on consideration specified in a contract with a customer, and the Company, when delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, when the fee is fixed or determinableexcludes any sales incentives and when collection is reasonably assured.amounts collected on behalf of third parties. The Company recognizes utility revenue each month based onis considered an agent for certain taxes collected from customers. As such, the services provided to all utility customers during the month. Accrued unbilled revenue which is included in receivables, net, represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. Accrued unbilled revenue at Montana-Dakota, Cascade and Intermountain was $112.7 million and $117.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recognizes construction contract revenue at its construction businesses using the percentage-of-completion method as discussed later. The Company recognizes all other revenues when services are rendered or goods are delivered. The Company presents revenues net of these taxes collected from customers at the time of sale to be remitted to governmental authorities, including sales and use taxes.
Percentage-of-completion method
The Company recognizes construction contract revenue from fixed-price and modified fixed-price construction contracts at its construction businesses using the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to estimated total costs for each contract. If a loss is anticipated on a contract, the loss is immediately recognized.

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 6171



Part II
 

CostsThe electric and natural gas distribution segments generate revenue from the sales of electric and natural gas products and services, which includes retail and transportation services. These segments establish a customer's retail or transportation service account based on the customer's application/contract for service, which indicates approval of a contract for service. The contract identifies an obligation to provide service in exchange for delivering or standing ready to deliver the identified commodity; and the customer is obligated to pay for the service as provided in the applicable tariff. The product sales are based on a fixed rate that includes a base and per-unit rate, which are included in approved tariffs as determined by state or federal regulatory agencies. The quantity of the commodity consumed or transported determines the total per-unit revenue. The service provided, along with the product consumed or transported, are a single performance obligation because both are required in combination to successfully transfer the contracted product or service to the customer. Revenues are recognized over time as customers receive and consume the products and services. The method of measuring progress toward the completion of the single performance obligation is on a per-unit output method basis, with revenue recognized based on the direct measurement of the value to the customer of the goods or services transferred to date. For contracts governed by the Company’s utility tariffs, amounts are billed monthly with the amount due between 15 and 22 days of receipt of the invoice depending on the applicable state’s tariff. For other contracts not governed by tariff, payment terms are net 30 days. At this time, the segment has no material obligations for returns, refunds or other similar obligations.
The pipeline and midstream segment generates revenue from providing natural gas transportation, gathering and underground storage services, as well as other energy-related services to both third parties and internal customers, largely the natural gas distribution segment. The pipeline and midstream segment establishes a contract with a customer based upon the customer’s request for firm or interruptible natural gas transportation, storage or gathering service(s). The contract identifies an obligation for the segment to provide the requested service(s) in exchange for consideration from the customer over a specified term. Depending on the type of service(s) requested and contracted, the service provided may include transporting, gathering or storing an identified quantity of natural gas and/or standing ready to deliver or store an identified quantity of natural gas. Natural gas transportation, gathering and storage revenues are based on fixed rates, which may include reservation fees and/or per-unit commodity rates. The services provided by the segment are generally treated as single performance obligations satisfied over time simultaneous to when the service is provided and revenue is recognized. Rates for the segment’s regulated services are based on its FERC approved tariff or customer negotiated rates, and rates for its non-regulated services are negotiated with its customers and set forth in the contract. For contracts governed by the company’s tariff, amounts are billed on or before the ninth business day of the following month and the amount is due within 12 days of receipt of the invoice. For gathering contracts not governed by the tariff, amounts are due within 20 days of invoice receipt. For other contracts not governed by the tariff, payment terms are net 30 days. At this time, the segment has no material obligations for returns, refunds or other similar obligations.
The construction materials and contracting segment generates revenue from contracting services and construction materials sales. This segment focuses on the vertical integration of its contracting services with its construction materials to support the aggregate based product lines. This segment provides contracting services to a customer when a contract has been signed by both the customer and a representative of the segment obligating a service to be provided in exchange for the consideration identified in the contract. The nature of the services this segment provides generally includes integrating a set of services and related construction materials into a single project to create a distinct bundle of goods and services, which the Company evaluates to determine whether a separate performance obligation exists. The transaction price is the original contract price plus any subsequent change orders and variable consideration. Examples of variable consideration that exist in this segment's contracts include liquidated damages; performance bonuses or incentives and penalties; claims; unapproved/unpriced change orders; and index pricing. The variable amounts usually arise upon achievement of certain performance metrics or change in project scope. The Company estimates the amount of revenue to be recognized on variable consideration using estimation methods that best predict the most likely amount of consideration the Company expects to be entitled to or expects to incur. The Company includes variable consideration in the estimated earningstransaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur or when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved. Changes in excesscircumstances could impact management's estimates made in determining the value of billingsvariable consideration recorded. The Company updates its estimate of the transaction price each reporting period and the effect of variable consideration on uncompletedthe transaction price is recognized as an adjustment to revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis. Revenue is recognized over time using an input method based on the cost-to-cost measure of progress on a project. This is the preferred method of measuring revenue because the costs incurred have been determined to represent the best indication of the overall progress toward the transfer of such goods or services promised to a customer. This segment also sells construction materials to third parties and internal customers. The contract for material sales is the use of a sales order or an invoice, which includes the pricing and payment terms. All material contracts represent revenuescontain a single performance obligation for the delivery of a single distinct product or a distinct separately identifiable bundle of products and services. Revenue is recognized at a point in excesstime when the performance obligation has been satisfied with the delivery of the products or services. The warranties associated with the sales are those consistent with a standard warranty that the product meets certain specifications for quality or those required by law. For most contracts, amounts billed and were included in receivables, net. Billings in excessto customers are due within 30 days of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts represent billings in excess of revenues recognized and were included in accounts payable. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts at December 31 were as follows:receipt. There are no material obligations for returns, refunds or other similar obligations.

 2017
2016
 (In thousands)
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts$109,541
$64,558
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts$84,123
$64,832
Amounts representing balances billed but not paid by customers under retainage provisions in contracts at December 31 were as follows:
 2017
2016
 (In thousands)
Short-term retainage*$57,134
$45,109
Long-term retainage**1,410
1,506
Total retainage$58,544
$46,615

*Expected to be paid within one year or less and included in receivables, net.
**Included in deferred charges and other assets - other.
 
72 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

The construction services segment generates revenue from specialty contracting services which also includes the sale of construction equipment and other supplies. This segment provides specialty contracting services to a customer when a contract has been signed by both the customer and a representative of the segment obligating a service to be provided in exchange for the consideration identified in the contract. The nature of the services this segment provides generally includes multiple promised goods and services in a single project to create a distinct bundle of goods and services, which the Company evaluates to determine whether a separate performance obligation exists. The transaction price is the original contract price plus any subsequent change orders and variable consideration. Examples of variable consideration that exist in this segment's contracts include claims, unapproved/unpriced change orders, bonuses, incentives, penalties and liquidated damages. The variable amounts usually arise upon achievement of certain performance metrics or change in project scope. The Company estimates the amount of revenue to be recognized on variable consideration using estimation methods that best predict the most likely amount of consideration the Company expects to be entitled to or expects to incur. The Company includes variable consideration in the estimated transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur or when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved. Changes in circumstances could impact management's estimates made in determining the value of variable consideration recorded. The Company updates its estimate of the transaction price each reporting period and the effect of variable consideration on the transaction price is recognized as an adjustment to revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis. Revenue is recognized over time using the input method based on the measurement of progress on a project. The input method is the preferred method of measuring revenue because the costs incurred have been determined to represent the best indication of the overall progress toward the transfer of such goods or services promised to a customer. This segment also sells construction equipment and other supplies to third parties and internal customers. The contract for these sales is the use of a sales order or invoice, which includes the pricing and payment terms. All such contracts include a single performance obligation for the delivery of a single distinct product or a distinct separately identifiable bundle of products and services. Revenue is recognized at a point in time when the performance obligation has been satisfied with the delivery of the products or services. The warranties associated with the sales are those consistent with a standard warranty that the product meets certain specifications for quality or those required by law. For most contracts, amounts billed to customers are due within 30 days of receipt. There are no material obligations for returns, refunds or other similar obligations.
The Company recognizes all other revenues when services are rendered or goods are delivered.
Asset retirement obligations
The Company records the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the Company capitalizes a cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, the Company either settles the obligation for the recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss at its nonregulated operations or incurs a regulatory asset or liability at its regulated operations. For more information on asset retirement obligations, see Note 7.
Legal costs
The Company expenses external legal fees as they are incurred.
Natural gas costs recoverable or refundable through rate adjustments
Under the terms of certain orders of the applicable state public service commissions, the Company is deferring natural gas commodity, transportation and storage costs that are greater or less than amounts presently being recovered through its existing rate schedules. Such orders generally provide that these amounts are recoverable or refundable through rate adjustments whichwithin a period ranging from 12 to 36 months from the time such costs are filed annually.paid. Natural gas costs refundable through rate adjustments were $28.523.8 million and $25.630.0 million at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, respectively, which is included in other accrued liabilities.liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Natural gas costs recoverable through rate adjustments were $14.5$89.2 million and $2.242.7 million at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, respectively, which is included in prepayments and other current assets.assets and deferred charges and other assets - other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Stock-based compensation
The Company determines compensation expense for stock-based awards based on the estimated fair values at the grant date and recognizes the related compensation expense over the vesting period. The Company uses the straight-line amortization method to recognize compensation expense related to restricted stock, which only has a service condition. This method recognizes stock compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. The Company recognizes compensation expense related to performance awards that vest based on performance metrics and service conditions on a straight-line basis over the service period. Inception-to-date expense is adjusted based upon the determination of the potential achievement of the performance target at each reporting date. The Company recognizes compensation expense related to performance awards with market-based performance metrics on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.
The Company records the compensation expense for performance share awards using an estimated forfeiture rate. The estimated forfeiture rate is calculated based on an average of actual historical forfeitures. The Company also preformsperforms an analysis of any known factors at the

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 73



Part II

time of the calculation to identify any necessary adjustments to the average historical forfeiture rate. At the time actual forfeitures become more than estimated forfeitures, the Company records compensation expense using actual forfeitures.
Income taxes
The Company provides deferred federal and state income taxes on all temporary differences between the book and tax basis of the Company's assets and liabilities by using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Excess deferred income tax balances associated with the Company's rate-regulated activities have been recorded as a regulatory liability and are included in other liabilities. These regulatory liabilities are expected to be reflected as a reduction in future rates charged to customers in accordance with applicable regulatory procedures.
The Company uses the deferral method of accounting for investment tax credits and amortizes the credits on regulated electric and natural gas distribution plant over various periods that conform to the ratemaking treatment prescribed by the applicable state public service commissions.

62 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

The Company records uncertain tax positions in accordance with accounting guidance on accounting for income taxes on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) the Company determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely than-not recognition threshold, the Company recognizes the largest amount of the tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. Tax positions that do not meet the more-likely-than-not criteria are reflected as a tax liability. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income taxes.
Earnings (loss) per common share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share were computed by dividing earnings (loss) on common stock by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share were computed by dividing earnings (loss) on common stock by the total of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year, plus the effect of nonvested performance share awards.awards and restricted stock units. Common stock outstanding includes issued shares less shares held in treasury. Earnings (loss) on common stock was the same for both the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share calculations. A reconciliation of the weighted average common shares outstanding used in the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation was as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
 (In thousands)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic195,304
195,299
194,928
198,612
195,720
195,304
Effect of dilutive performance share awards383
319
58
14
430
383
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted195,687
195,618
194,986
198,626
196,150
195,687
Shares excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share


164
10


Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used for items such as long-lived assets and goodwill; fair values of acquired assets and liabilities under the acquisition method of accounting; aggregate reserves; property depreciable lives; tax provisions; revenue recognized using the cost-to-cost measure of progress for contracts; uncollectible accounts; environmental and other loss contingencies; accumulated provision for revenues subjectregulatory assets expected to refund;be recovered in rates charged to customers; costs on construction contracts; unbilled revenues; actuarially determined benefit costs; asset retirement obligations; lease classification; present value of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities; and the valuation of stock-based compensation. As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates are revised. Consequently, operating results can be affected by revisions to prior accounting estimates.
New accounting standards
Recently adopted accounting standards
Simplifying the Measurement of InventoryASU 2016-02 - Leases In July 2015, the FASB issued guidance regarding inventory that is measured using the first-in, first-out or average cost method. The guidance does not apply to inventory measured using the last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method. The guidance requires inventory within its scope to be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value, which is the estimated selling price in the normal course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. These amendments more closely align GAAP with IFRS. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2017, on a prospective basis. The guidance did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position, cash flows or disclosures.
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance regarding simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The guidance affects the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows and calculation of dilutive shares. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2017. All amendments in the guidance that apply to the Company were adopted on a prospective basis resulting in no adjustments being made to retained earnings. The adoption of the guidance impacted the Consolidated Statement of Income and the Consolidated Balance Sheet in the first quarter of 2017 due to the taxes related to the stock-based compensation award that vested in February 2017 being recognized as income tax expense as compared to a reduction to additional paid-in capital under the previous guidance. Adoption of the guidance also increased the number of shares included in the diluted earnings per share calculation due to the exclusion of tax benefits in the incremental shares calculation. The change in the weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted did not result in a material effect on the earnings per common share - diluted.


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 63



Part II

Recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted
Revenue from Contracts with Customers In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance on accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. The guidance provides for a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry specific guidance. In August 2015, the FASB issued guidance deferring the effective date of the revenue guidance and allowing entities to early adopt. With this decision, the guidance was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Entities had the option of using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach to adopting the guidance. Under the modified retrospective approach, an entity recognizes the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance with an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.
The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective approach. The Company has substantially completed the evaluation of contracts and methods of revenue recognition under the previous accounting guidance and has not identified any material cumulative effect adjustments to be made to retained earnings. In addition, the Company will have expanded revenue disclosures, both quantitatively and qualitatively, related to the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers in the first quarter of 2018. The Company has reviewed substantially all of its revenue streams to evaluate the impact of this guidance and does not anticipate a significant change in the timing of revenue recognition, results of operations, financial position or cash flows. The Company reviewed its internal controls related to revenue recognition and disclosures and concluded that the guidance impacts certain business processes and controls. As such, the Company has developed modifications to its internal controls for certain topics under the guidance as they apply to the Company and such modifications were not deemed to be significant.
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesIn January 2016, the FASB issued guidance regarding the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The guidance revises the way an entity classifies and measures investments in equity securities, the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value and amends certain disclosure requirements related to the fair value of financial instruments. This guidance was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The guidance was to be applied using a modified retrospective approach with the exception of equity securities without readily determinable fair values which should be applied prospectively. The Company continues to evaluate the effects the adoption of the new guidance will have on its results of operations, financial position, cash flows and disclosures and does not anticipate a material impact.
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is intended to standardize the presentation and classification of certain transactions, including cash payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment, proceeds from insurance claim settlements and distributions from equity method investments. In addition, the guidance clarifies how to classify transactions that have characteristics of more than one class of cash flows. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2018, on a prospective basis. The Company does not anticipate the guidance to have a material effect on its future results of operations, financial position, cash flows and disclosures.
Clarifying the Definition of a Business In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The guidance provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. The guidance also affects other aspects of accounting, such as determining reporting units for goodwill testing and whether an entity has acquired or sold a business. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2018, on a prospective basis. The Company does not anticipate the guidance to have a material effect on its future results of operations, financial position, cash flows and disclosures.
Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost In March 2017, the FASB issued guidance to improve the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost. The guidance requires the service cost component to be presented in the income statement in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services performed during the period. Other components of net benefit costs shall be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. The guidance also allows only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization. The guidance was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, including interim periods, on a retrospective basis for all periods presented with the exception of the capitalization of the service cost component which was adopted on a prospective basis.
The Company will reclassify all components of net periodic benefit costs, except for the service cost component, from operating expenses to other income (expense) on the Consolidated Statements of Income for all years presented prior to January 1, 2018, beginning in the first quarter of 2018, with no impact to earnings. The guidance will not have a material impact on the Company's disclosures or cash flows.
Under FERC regulation, all components of net periodic benefit costs are currently eligible for capitalization. The Company's electric and natural gas distribution businesses have elected to continue to defer all components of net periodic benefit costs as regulatory assets or liabilities.

64 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Leases In February 2016, the FASB issued this ASU guidance regarding leases.relating to ASC 842 - Leases. The guidance requiresrequired lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on the balance sheet for operating and financing leases with terms of more than 12 months.leases. The guidance remainsremained largely the same for lessors, although some changes were made to better align lessor accounting with the new lessee accounting and to align with the revenue recognition standard. The guidance also requiresrequired additional disclosures, both quantitative and qualitative, related to operating and financefinancing leases for the lessee and sales-type, direct financing and operating leases for the lessor. This guidance will be effective forThe Company adopted the Companystandard on January 1, 2019,2019.

74 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11 - Leases: Targeted Improvements, an accounting standard update to ASU 2016-02. This ASU provided an entity the option to adopt the guidance using one of two modified retrospective approaches. An entity could adopt the guidance using the modified retrospective transition approach beginning in the earliest year presented in the financial statements. This method of adoption would have required the restatement of prior periods reported and should be applied using a retrospective approach with early adoption permitted. The Company continues to evaluate the potential impact the adoptionpresentation of lease disclosures under the new guidance will havefor all periods reported. The additional transition method of adoption, introduced by ASU 2018-11, allowed entities the option to apply the guidance on its resultsthe date of operations, financial position, cash flowsadoption by recognizing a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings during the period of adoption and disclosures. did not require prior comparative periods to be restated.
The Company is planning to adoptadopted the standard on January 1, 2019, utilizing the additional transition method of adoption applied on the date of adoption and the practical expedient that allowsallowed the Company to not reassess whether an expired or existing contract containscontained a lease, the classification of leases or initial direct costs. The Company did not identify any cumulative effect adjustments. The Company also adopted a short-term leasing policy as the lessee where leases with a term of 12 months or less are not included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
As a practical expedient, a lessee may choose not to separate nonlease components from lease components and instead account for lease and nonlease components as a single lease component. The election shall be made by asset class. The Company has elected to adopt the lease/nonlease component practical expedient for all asset classes as the lessee. The Company did not elect the practical expedient to use hindsight when assessing the lease term or impairment of right-of-use assets for the existing leases on the date of adoption.
In January 2018, the FASB issued a practical expedient for land easements under the new lease guidance. The practical expedient permits an entity to elect the option to not evaluate land easements under the new guidance if they existed or expired before the adoption of the new lease guidance and were not previously accounted for as leases under the previous lease guidance. Once an entity adopts the new guidance, the entity should apply the new guidance on a prospective basis to all new or modified land easements. The Company is currently evaluatinghas adopted this practical expedient.
The Company formed a lease implementation team to review and assess existing contracts to identify and evaluate those containing leases. Additionally, the team implemented new and revised existing software to meet the reporting and disclosure requirements of the standard. The Company also assessed the impact the standard had on its processes and internal controls and identified new and updated existing internal controls and processes to ensure compliance with the new lease standard; such modifications were not deemed to be significant. During the assessment phase, the Company used various surveys, reconciliations and analytic methodologies to ensure the completeness of the practical expedient.
On January 5, 2018,lease inventory. The Company determined that most of the FASB issued a proposed accounting standard updatecurrent operating leases were subject to the guidance that would allow an entityand were recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on the optionConsolidated Balance Sheet upon adoption. On January 1, 2019, the Company recorded approximately $112 million to adoptright-of-use assets and lease liabilities as a result of the initial adoption of the guidance. In addition, the Company evaluated the impact the new guidance had on lease contracts where the Company is the lessor and determined it did not have a modified retrospective basis. Under the modified retrospective approach, an entity would recognize a cumulative effect adjustment of initially applying the guidancesignificant impact to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The Company is monitoring the status of the proposal.Company's financial statements.
ASU 2017-04 - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill ImpairmentIn January 2017, the FASB issued guidance on simplifying the test for goodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2, which required an entity to measure the amount of impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of such goodwill. This guidance requires entities to perform a quantitative impairment test, previously Step 1, to identify both the existence of impairment and the amount of impairment loss by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount. Entities will continue to have the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The guidance also requires additional disclosures if an entity has one or more reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts of net assets. The Company early adopted the guidance on a prospective basis beginning with the preparation of its 2019 goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2019. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, cash flows or disclosures.
ASU 2018-15 - Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract In August 2018, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract. The guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract similar to the costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software and such capitalized costs to be expensed over the term of the hosting arrangement. Costs incurred during the preliminary and postimplementation stages should continue to be expensed as activities are performed. The capitalized costs are required to be presented on the balance sheet in the same line the prepayment for the fees associated with the hosting arrangement would be presented. In addition, the expense related to the capitalized implementation costs should be presented in the same line on the income statement as the fees associated with the hosting element of the arrangements. The Company adopted the guidance effective January 1, 2019, on a prospective basis. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, cash flows or disclosures.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 75



Part II

Recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted
ASU 2016-13 - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance on the measurement of credit losses on certain financial instruments. The guidance introduces a new impairment model known as the current expected credit loss model that will replace the incurred loss impairment methodology currently included under GAAP. This guidance requires entities to present certain investments in debt securities, trade accounts receivable and other financial assets at their net carrying value of the amount expected to be collected on the financial statements. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2020.

The Company formed an implementation team to review and assess existing financial assets to identify and evaluate the financial assets subject to the new current expected credit loss model. The Company assessed the impact of the guidance on its processes and internal controls and has identified and updated existing internal controls and processes to ensure compliance with the new guidance; such modifications were deemed insignificant. During the assessment phase, the Company completed checklists to identify the complete portfolio of assets subject to the current expected credit loss model. The Company determined the guidance did not have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, cash flows or disclosures and did not record a material cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption.
ASU 2018-13 - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement In August 2018, the FASB issued guidance on modifying the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements as part of the disclosure framework project. The guidance modifies, among other things, the disclosures required for Level 3 fair value measurements, including the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs. The guidance removes, among other things, the disclosure requirement to disclose transfers between Levels 1 and 2. The guidance will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2020, including interim periods, with early adoption permitted. Level 3 fair value measurement disclosures should be applied prospectively while all other amendments should be applied retrospectively. The Company continues to evaluate the effects the adoption of the new guidance will have on its disclosures in the first quarter of 2020.
ASU 2018-14 - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans In August 2018, the FASB issued guidance on modifying the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans as part of the disclosure framework project. The guidance removes disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial, clarifies the specific requirements of disclosures and shouldadds disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The guidance adds, among other things, the requirement to include an explanation for significant gains and losses related to changes in benefit obligations for the period. The guidance removes, among other things, the disclosure requirement to disclose the amount of net periodic benefit costs to be amortized over the next fiscal year from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and the effects a one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates will have on certain benefit components. The guidance will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2021, and must be applied on a prospectiveretrospective basis with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effects the adoption of the new guidance will have on its disclosures.
ASU 2019-12 - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes In December 2019, the FASB issued guidance on simplifying the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions in ASC 740 and providing simplification amendments. The guidance removes exceptions on intraperiod tax allocations and reporting and provides simplification on accounting for franchise taxes, tax basis goodwill and tax law changes. The guidance will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2021, with early adoption permitted. Transition requirements vary among the exceptions and amendments which include retrospective, modified retrospective and prospective application. The Company does not expect the guidance to have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, cash flows and disclosures.
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income In February 2018, the FASB issued guidance that allows an entity to reclassify the stranded tax effects resulting from the newly enacted federal corporate income tax rate from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings. The guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019, including interim periods, with early adoption permitted. The guidance can be applied using one of two methods. One method is to record the reclassification of the stranded income taxes at the beginning of the period of adoption. The other method is to apply the guidance retrospectively to each period in which the income tax effects of the TCJA are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company is evaluating adoption of the guidance in the first quarter of 2018. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $7.7 million of stranded tax effects in the accumulated other comprehensive loss balance.
Variable interest entities
The Company evaluates its arrangements and contracts with other entities to determine if they are VIEs and if so, if the Company is the primary beneficiary. GAAP provides a framework for identifying VIEs and determining when a company should include the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interest and results of activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements.
A VIE should be consolidated if a party with an ownership, contractual or other financial interest in the VIE (a variable interest holder) has the power to direct the VIE's most significant activities and the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary beneficiary generally must initially record all of the VIE's assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests at fair value and subsequently account for the VIE as if it were consolidated.
The Company's evaluation of whether it qualifies as the primary beneficiary of a VIE involves significant judgments, estimates and assumptions and includes a qualitative analysis of the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and whether the Company has the power to direct those activities, the design of the entity, the rights of the parties and the purpose of the arrangement.

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 65



Part II

Comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is the sum of net income (loss) as reported and other comprehensive income (loss). The Company's other comprehensive income (loss) resulted from gains (losses) on derivative instruments qualifying as hedges, postretirement liability adjustments, foreign currency translation adjustments and gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments.
The after-tax changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, were as follows:
 
Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Derivative
 Instruments
 Qualifying
as Hedges

Post-
retirement
 Liability
Adjustment

Foreign
Currency
 Translation
 Adjustment

Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Available-
for-sale
Investments

Total
Accumulated
 Other
Comprehensive
 Loss

   (In thousands)
  
Balance at December 31, 2015$(2,667)$(34,257)$(200)$(24)$(37,148)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(1,470)51
(182)(1,601)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss367
2,506

143
3,016
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)367
1,036
51
(39)1,415
Balance at December 31, 2016(2,300)(33,221)(149)(63)(35,733)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
(1,812)(6)(139)(1,957)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss366
1,013

120
1,499
Amounts reclassified to accumulated other comprehensive loss from a regulatory asset
(1,143)

(1,143)
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)366
(1,942)(6)(19)(1,601)
Balance at December 31, 2017$(1,934)$(35,163)$(155)$(82)$(37,334)

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
 2017
2016
Location on Consolidated
Statements of Income
 (In thousands) 
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative
instruments included in net income (loss):
   
Interest rate derivative instruments$(590)$(593)Interest expense
 224
226
Income taxes
 (366)(367) 
Amortization of postretirement liability losses included
in net periodic benefit cost (credit)
(1,658)(3,931)(a)
 645
1,425
Income taxes
 (1,013)(2,506) 
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale
investments included in net income (loss)
(185)(220)Other income
 65
77
Income taxes
 (120)(143) 
Total reclassifications$(1,499)$(3,016) 
(a)Included in net periodic benefit cost (credit). For more information, see Note 14.

Note 2 - Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
Assets held for sale
The assets of Pronghorn were classified as held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2016. Pronghorn's results of operations for 2016 were included in the pipeline and midstream segment.

6676 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
The Company's accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of losses on derivative instruments qualifying as hedges, postretirement liability adjustments, foreign currency translation adjustments and gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments.
PronghornThe after-tax changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at On November 21, 2016, WBI Energy Midstream announced it had enteredDecember 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, were as follows:
 
Net
Unrealized
Loss on
Derivative
 Instruments
 Qualifying
as Hedges

Post-
retirement
 Liability
Adjustment

Foreign
Currency
 Translation
 Adjustment

Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Available-
for-sale
Investments

Total
Accumulated
 Other
Comprehensive
 Loss

 (In thousands)
At December 31, 2017$(1,934)$(35,163)$(155)$(82)$(37,334)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
4,441
(61)(144)4,236
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss162
2,173
249
131
2,715
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)162
6,614
188
(13)6,951
Reclassification adjustment of prior period tax effects related to TCJA included in accumulated other comprehensive loss(389)(7,520)(33)(17)(7,959)
At December 31, 2018(2,161)(36,069)
(112)(38,342)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(6,151)
134
(6,017)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss731
1,486

40
2,257
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)731
(4,665)
174
(3,760)
At December 31, 2019$(1,430)$(40,734)$
$62
$(42,102)

The following amounts were reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss into net income. The amounts presented in parenthesis indicate a purchase and sale agreementdecrease to sell its 50 percent non-operating ownership interest in Pronghorn to Andeavor Field Services LLC.net income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The transaction closed on January 1, 2017, which generated approximately $100 million of proceedsreclassifications for the Company. The sale of Pronghorn further reduced the Company's risk exposure to commodity prices.
The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets classified as held for sale associated with Pronghorn on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets atyears ended December 31 were as follows:
 2016
 (In thousands)
Assets 
Current assets: 
Prepayments and other current assets$68
Total current assets held for sale68
Noncurrent assets: 
Net property, plant and equipment93,424
Goodwill9,737
Less allowance for impairment of assets held for sale2,311
Total noncurrent assets held for sale100,850
Total assets held for sale$100,918
 2019
2018
Location on Consolidated
Statements of Income
 (In thousands) 
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative instruments included in net income$(591)$(591)Interest expense
 (140)429
Income taxes
 (731)(162) 
Amortization of postretirement liability losses included in net periodic benefit cost(1,962)(2,894)Other income
 476
721
Income taxes
 (1,486)(2,173) 
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation adjustment included in net income
(324)Other income
 
75
Income taxes
 
(249) 
Reclassification adjustment for loss on available-for-sale investments included in net income(50)(166)Other income
 10
35
Income taxes
 (40)(131) 
Total reclassifications$(2,257)$(2,715) 


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 77



Part II

Note 2 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Revenue is recognized when a performance obligation is satisfied by transferring control over a product or service to a customer. Revenue is measured based on consideration specified in a contract with a customer and excludes any sales incentives and amounts collected on behalf of third parties. The Company is considered an agent for certain taxes collected from customers. As such, the Company presents revenues net of these taxes at the time of sale to be remitted to governmental authorities, including sales and use taxes.
As part of the adoption of ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers, the Company elected the practical expedient to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the asset that the Company otherwise would have recognized is 12 months or less.
Disaggregation
In the following table, revenue is disaggregated by the type of customer or service provided. The Company believes this level of disaggregation best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. The table also includes a reconciliation of the disaggregated revenue by reportable segments. For more information on the Company's business segments, see Note 16.
Year ended December 31, 2019Electric
Natural gas distribution
Pipeline and midstream
Construction materials and contracting
Construction services
Other
Total
 (In thousands)
Residential utility sales$125,369
$483,452
$
$
$
$
$608,821
Commercial utility sales141,596
296,835




438,431
Industrial utility sales37,765
26,895




64,660
Other utility sales7,408





7,408
Natural gas transportation
45,449
101,665



147,114
Natural gas gathering

9,164



9,164
Natural gas storage

11,708



11,708
Contracting services


1,088,633


1,088,633
Construction materials


1,627,833


1,627,833
Intrasegment eliminations*


(525,749)

(525,749)
Inside specialty contracting



1,266,196

1,266,196
Outside specialty contracting



531,882

531,882
Other35,574
12,726
17,687

131
16,551
82,669
Intersegment eliminations

(56,252)(1,066)(3,370)(16,461)(77,149)
Revenues from contracts with customers347,712
865,357
83,972
2,189,651
1,794,839
90
5,281,621
Revenues out of scope4,013
(135)220

51,057

55,155
Total external operating revenues$351,725
$865,222
$84,192
$2,189,651
$1,845,896
$90
$5,336,776
*Intrasegment revenues are presented within the construction materials and contracting segment to highlight the focus on vertical integration as this segment sells materials to both third parties and internal customers. Due to consolidation requirements, these revenues must be eliminated against construction materials to arrive at the external operating revenue total for the segment.


78 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Year ended December 31, 2018Electric
Natural gas distribution
Pipeline and midstream
Construction materials and contracting
Construction services
Other
Total
 (In thousands)
Residential utility sales$121,477
$457,959
$
$
$
$
$579,436
Commercial utility sales136,236
276,716




412,952
Industrial utility sales34,353
24,603




58,956
Other utility sales7,556





7,556
Natural gas transportation
43,238
89,159



132,397
Natural gas gathering

9,159



9,159
Natural gas storage

11,543



11,543
Contracting services


968,755


968,755
Construction materials


1,423,068


1,423,068
Intrasegment eliminations*


(465,969)

(465,969)
Inside specialty contracting



926,875

926,875
Outside specialty contracting



392,544

392,544
Other31,568
14,579
18,865

525
11,259
76,796
Intersegment eliminations

(50,905)(669)(1,681)(11,052)(64,307)
Revenues from contracts with customers331,190
817,095
77,821
1,925,185
1,318,263
207
4,469,761
Revenues out of scope3,933
6,152
197

51,509

61,791
Total external operating revenues$335,123
$823,247
$78,018
$1,925,185
$1,369,772
$207
$4,531,552
*Intrasegment revenues are presented within the construction materials and contracting segment to highlight the focus on vertical integration as this segment sells materials to both third parties and internal customers. Due to consolidation requirements, these revenues must be eliminated against construction materials to arrive at the external operating revenue total for the segment.

Contract balances
The timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers. The timing of invoicing to customers does not necessarily correlate with the timing of revenues being recognized under the cost‐to‐cost method of accounting. Contracts from contracting services are billed as work progresses in accordance with agreed upon contractual terms. Generally, billing to the customer occurs contemporaneous to revenue recognition. A variance in timing of the billings may result in a contract asset or a contract liability. A contract asset occurs when revenues are recognized under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, which exceeds amounts billed on uncompleted contracts. Such amounts will be billed as standard contract terms allow, usually based on various measures of performance or achievement. A contract liability occurs when there are billings in excess of revenues recognized under the cost-to-cost measure of progress on uncompleted contracts. Contract liabilities decrease as revenue is recognized from the satisfaction of the related performance obligation.
The changes in contract assets and liabilities were as follows:
 December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Change
Location on Consolidated Balance Sheets
 (In thousands)  
Contract assets$109,078
$104,239
$4,839
Receivables, net
Contract liabilities - current(142,768)(93,901)(48,867)Accounts payable
Contract liabilities - noncurrent(19)(135)116
Deferred credits and other liabilities - other
Net contract assets (liabilities)$(33,709)$10,203
$(43,912) 

 December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017
Change
Location on Consolidated Balance Sheets
 (In thousands)  
Contract assets$104,239
$109,540
$(5,301)Receivables, net
Contract liabilities - current(93,901)(84,123)(9,778)Accounts payable
Contract liabilities - noncurrent(135)
(135)Deferred credits and other liabilities - other
Net contract assets$10,203
$25,417
$(15,214) 

The Company performedrecognized $89.0 million and $78.6 million in revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which was previously included in contract liabilities at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 79



Part II

The Company recognized a net increase in revenues of $44.1 million and $36.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, from performance obligations satisfied in prior periods.
Remaining performance obligations
The remaining performance obligations at the construction materials and contracting and construction services segments include unrecognized revenues, also referred to as backlog, that the Company reasonably expects to be realized. These unrecognized revenues can include: projects that have a written award, a letter of intent, a notice to proceed, an agreed upon work order to perform work on mutually accepted terms and conditions and change orders or claims to the extent management believes additional contract revenues will be earned and are deemed probable of collection. Excluded from remaining performance obligations are potential orders under master service agreements. The remaining performance obligations at the pipeline and midstream segment include firm transportation and storage contracts with fixed pricing and fixed volumes.
At December 31, 2019, the Company's remaining performance obligations were $2.0 billion. The Company expects to recognize the following revenue amounts in future periods related to these remaining performance obligations: $1.5 billion within the next 12 months or less; $229.4 million within the next 13 to 24 months; and $259.3 million thereafter.
The majority of the Company's construction contracts have an original duration of less than two years. The Company's firm transportation and firm storage contracts have weighted average remaining durations of approximately five and three years, respectively.
Note 3 - Business Combinations
The acquisitions below were accounted for as business combinations in accordance with ASC 805 - Business Combinations. The results of the acquired businesses have been included in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on the acquisition date. Pro forma financial amounts reflecting the effects of the business combinations are not presented, as none of these business combinations were material to the Company's financial position or results of operations.
For all business combinations, the Company preliminarily allocates the purchase price of the acquisitions to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition dates and are considered provisional until final fair values are determined or the measurement period has passed. The Company expects to record adjustments as it accumulates the information needed to estimate the fair value assessment of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including working capital balances, estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, total consideration and goodwill. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values is recorded as goodwill. The Company calculated the fair value of the assets acquired in 2019 and 2018 using a market or cost approach (or a combination of both). Fair values for some of the assets were determined based on Level 3 inputs including estimated future cash flows, discount rates, growth rates, sales projections, retention rates and terminal values, all of which require significant management judgment and are susceptible to change. The final fair value of the net assets acquired may result in adjustments to the assets and liabilities, classifiedincluding goodwill, and will be made as held for sale. Insoon as practical, but no later than one year from the fourth quarterrespective acquisition dates. Any subsequent measurement period adjustments are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's results of 2016,operations. The discount rate used in calculating the fair value assessmentof the common stock issued was determined using the market approachby a Black-Scholes-Merton model. The model used Level 2 inputs including risk-free interest rate, volatility range and dividend yield.
The acquisitions are also subject to customary adjustments based on, among other things, the amount of cash, debt and working capital in the business as of the closing date. The amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these adjustments are considered provisional until final settlement has occurred.
The following are the acquisitions made during 2019 and 2018 at the construction materials and contracting segment:
In December 2019, the Company acquired Roadrunner Ready Mix, Inc., a provider of ready-mixed concrete in Idaho.
In March 2019, the Company acquired Viesko Redi-Mix, Inc., a provider of ready-mixed concrete in Oregon.
In October 2018, the Company acquired Sweetman Construction Company, a provider of aggregates, asphalt and ready-mixed concrete in South Dakota.
In July 2018, the Company acquired Molalla Redi-Mix and Rock Products, Inc., a producer of ready-mixed concrete in Oregon.
In June 2018, the Company acquired Tri-City Paving, Inc., a general contractor and aggregate, asphalt and ready-mixed concrete supplier in Minnesota.
In April 2018, the Company acquired Teevin & Fischer Quarry, LLC, an aggregate producer that provides crushed rock and gravel to construction and retail customers in Oregon.
In addition to the above acquisitions, in September 2019, the Company purchased the assets of Pride Electric, Inc., an electrical construction company in Washington. The results of Pride Electric, Inc. are included in the constructions services segment.

80 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

In 2019, the gross aggregate consideration for acquisitions was $56.8 million, subject to certain adjustments, and includes $1.2��million of debt assumed. The amounts allocated to the aggregated assets acquired and liabilities assumed during 2019 were as follows: $15.8 million to current assets; $16.7 million to property, plant and equipment; $23.1 million to goodwill; $6.7 million to other intangible assets; $500,000 to deferred charges and other assets - other; $5.9 million to current liabilities and $100,000 to deferred credits and other liabilities - other. At December 31, 2019, the purchase price adjustments for Viesko Redi-Mix, Inc. have been settled and sale agreementno material adjustments were made to the provisional accounting. Purchase price allocations for Pride Electric, Inc. and Roadrunner Ready Mix, Inc. are preliminary and will be finalized within one year of the respective acquisition dates. The Company issued debt and equity securities to finance these acquisitions.
In 2018, the gross aggregate consideration for acquisitions was $168.1 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments, and 721,610 shares of common stock with Andeavor Field Services LLC. Thea market value of $20.3 million as of the respective acquisition date. Due to the holding period restriction on the common stock, the share consideration was discounted to a fair value assessment indicated an impairment basedof approximately $18.2 million, as reflected in the Company's financial statements. In addition to the issuance of the Company's equity securities, the Company issued debt to finance these acquisitions.
During the third quarter of 2019, the Company finalized its valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in conjunction with the acquisition in 2018 of Sweetman Construction Company. As a result, measurement period adjustments were made to the previously disclosed provisional fair values. At December 31, 2019, the purchase price adjustments for all business combinations that occurred in 2018 had been finalized. These adjustments did not have a material impact on the carrying value exceedingCompany's consolidated results of operations. The aggregate total consideration for the fair value, which resulted in2018 acquisitions and the Company recording an impairment of $2.3 million ($1.4 million after tax) infinal amounts allocated to the quarterassets acquired and liabilities assumed were as follows:
 December 31, 2018
Measurement Period Adjustments
December 31, 2019
 (In thousands)
Assets   
Current assets:   
Receivables, net$18,984
$
$18,984
Inventories10,329
(228)10,101
Other current assets515
(14)501
Total current assets29,828
(242)29,586
Property, plant and equipment131,766
6,669
138,435
Deferred charges and other assets: 



Goodwill33,131
(6,669)26,462
Other intangible assets, net8,227

8,227
Other927

927
Total deferred charges and other assets42,285
(6,669)35,616
Total assets acquired$203,879
$(242)$203,637
Liabilities 



Current liabilities$11,122
$(242)$10,880
Deferred credits and other liabilities: 



Asset retirement obligation914

914
Deferred income taxes5,565

5,565
Total deferred credits and other liabilities6,479

6,479
Total liabilities assumed$17,601
$(242)$17,359
Total consideration (fair value)$186,278
$
$186,278

For the years ended December 31, 2016. The fair value of Pronghorn's assets have been categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The impairment was recorded2019 and 2018, costs incurred for acquisitions were $655,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, and are included in operation and maintenance expense on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Income.
Note 4 - Discontinued operationsOperations
The assets and liabilities of the Company's discontinued operations have been classified as held for sale and the results of operations are shown in lossincome (loss) from discontinued operations, other than certain general and administrative costs and interest expense which do not meet the criteria for income (loss) from discontinued operations. At the time the assets were classified as held for sale, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense was no longer recorded.
Dakota Prairie Refining On June 24, 2016, WBI Energy entered into a membership interest purchase agreement with Tesoro to sell all of the outstanding membership interests in Dakota Prairie Refining to Tesoro. WBI Energy and Calumet each previously owned 50 percent of the Dakota Prairie Refining membership interests and were equal members in building and operating Dakota Prairie Refinery. To effectuate the sale, WBI Energy acquired Calumet's 50 percent membership interest in Dakota Prairie Refining on June 27, 2016. The sale of the membership interests to Tesoro closed on June 27, 2016. The sale of Dakota Prairie Refining reduced the Company's risk by decreasing exposure to commodity prices.
Centennial continues to guarantee certain debt obligations of Dakota Prairie Refining; however, Tesoro has agreed to indemnify Centennial for any losses and litigation expenses arising for the guarantee. For more information related to the guarantee, see Note 17.

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 6781



Part II
 

On June 27, 2016, the Company sold Dakota Prairie Refining to Tesoro. During 2015 and 2016, the Company sold substantially all of Fidelity's oil and natural gas assets. In July 2018, the Company completed the sale of a majority of the remaining property, plant and equipment of Fidelity. The sales of Dakota Prairie Refining and Fidelity were part of the Company's strategic plan to grow its capital investments in the remaining business segments, reduce exposure to commodity pricing and to focus on creating a greater long-term value.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s deferred tax assets included in assets held for sale of $1.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively, were largely comprised of state alternative minimum tax credits.
The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale related to the operations of and activity associated with Dakota Prairie Refining, on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 were as follows:
 2017
 2016
 (In thousands)
Assets   
Current assets:   
Income taxes receivable$1,778
 $13,987
Total current assets held for sale1,778
 13,987
Total assets held for sale$1,778
(a)$13,987
Liabilities   
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$
 $7,425
Total current liabilities held for sale
 7,425
Noncurrent liabilities:   
Deferred income taxes (b)37
 14
Total noncurrent liabilities held for sale37
 14
Total liabilities held for sale$37
 $7,439
(a)On the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, these amounts were reclassified to current income taxes payable and are reflected in current liabilities held for sale.
(b)On the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, these amounts were reclassified to noncurrent deferred income tax assets
and are reflected in noncurrent assets held for sale.
The Company retained certain liabilities of Dakota Prairie Refining which were reflected in current liabilities held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016. In the first quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a reversal of a previously accrued liability of $7.0 million ($4.3 million after tax) due to the resolution of a legal matter. As of December 31, 2017, Dakota Prairie Refining had not incurred any material exit and disposal costs, and does not expect to incur any material exit and disposal costs.
The Company performed a fair value assessment of the assets and liabilities classified as held for sale. In the second quarter of 2016, the fair value assessment was determined using the market approach based on the sale transaction to Tesoro. The fair value assessment indicated an impairment based on the carrying value exceeding the fair value, which resulted in the Company recording an impairment of $251.9 million ($156.7 million after tax) in the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The impairment was included in operating expenses from discontinued operations. The fair value of Dakota Prairie Refining's assets have been categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Fidelity In the second quarter of 2015, the Company began the marketing and sale process of Fidelity with an anticipated sale to occur within one year. Between September 2015 and March 2016, the Company entered into purchase and sale agreements to sell substantially all of Fidelity's oil and natural gas assets. The completion of these sales occurred between October 2015 and April 2016. The sale of Fidelity was part of the Company's strategic plan to grow its capital investments in the remaining business segments and to focus on creating a greater long-term value.

68 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale, related to the operations of Fidelity, on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 were as follows:
2017
 2016
 2019
2018
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Assets     
Current assets:     
Receivables, net$479
 $355
 $425
$430
Total current assets held for sale479
 355
 425
430
Noncurrent assets:     
Net property, plant and equipment1,631
 5,507
 
Deferred income taxes2,637
 91,098
 1,265
1,926
Other161
 161
 161
161
Less allowance for impairment of assets held for sale
 938
 
Total noncurrent assets held for sale4,429
 95,828
 1,426
2,087
Total assets held for sale$4,908
 $96,183
 $1,851
$2,517
Liabilities     
Current liabilities:     
Accounts payable$30
 $141
 $
$80
Taxes payable10,857
 19
(a)1,279
1,451
Other accrued liabilities2,884
 2,358
 2,232
2,470
Total current liabilities held for sale13,771
 2,518
 3,511
4,001
Total liabilities held for sale$13,771
 $2,518
 $3,511
$4,001

(a)On the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, this amount was reclassified to prepayments and other current assets and
is reflected in current assets held for sale.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s deferred tax assets included in assets held for sale were largely comprised of $2.6 million and $89.3 million, respectively, of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards. The Company realized substantially all of the outstanding net operating loss carryforwards in 2017.
The Company had federal income tax net operating loss carryforwards of $4.4 million and $297.2 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had various state income tax net operating loss carryforwards of $13.8 million and $189.1 million, respectively. The federal net operating loss carryforwards expire in 2036 and 2037 if not utilized. The state net operating loss carryforwards are due to expire between 2023 and 2037. It is likely a portion of the benefit from the state carryforwards will not be realized; therefore, valuation allowances of $349,000 and $500,000 have been provided in 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Company performed a fair value assessment of the assets and liabilities classified as held for sale. In the first quarter of 2016, the fair value assessment was determined using the market approach largely based on a purchase and sale agreement. The estimated fair value exceeded the carrying value and the Company recorded an impairment reversal of $1.4 million ($900,000 after tax) in the first quarter of 2016. In the second quarter of 2016, the fair value assessment was determined using the income and market approaches. The income approach was determined by using the present value of future estimated cash flows. The market approach was based on market transactions of similar properties. The estimated carrying value exceeded the fair value and the Company recorded an impairment of $900,000 ($600,000 after tax) in the second quarter of 2016.
In the second quarter of 2015, the estimated fair value was determined using the income and the market approaches. The income approach was determined by using the present value of future estimated cash flows. The income approach considered management's views on current operating measures as well as assumptions pertaining to market forces in the oil and gas industry including estimated reserves, estimated prices, market differentials, estimates of well operating and future development costs and timing of operations. The estimated cash flows were discounted using a rate believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants. The market approach was provided by a third party and based on market transactions involving similar interests in oil and natural gas properties. The fair value assessment indicated an impairment based on the carrying value exceeding the estimated fair value, which is resulted in the Company writing down Fidelity's assets at June 30, 2015, and recording an impairment of $400.0 million ($252.0 million after tax) during the second quarter of 2015. In the third quarter of 2015, the estimated fair value of Fidelity was determined by agreed upon pricing in the purchase and sale agreements for the assets subject to the agreements, the majority of which closed during the fourth quarter of 2015, including customary purchase price adjustments. The values received in the bid proposals were lower than originally anticipated due to lower commodity prices

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 69



Part II

than those projected in the second quarter of 2015. For those assets for which a purchase and sale agreement had not been entered into at that time, the fair value was based on the market approach utilizing multiples based on similar interests in oil and natural gas properties. The fair value assessment indicated an impairment based on the carrying value exceeding the estimated fair value, which resulted in the Company writing down Fidelity's assets at September 30, 2015, and recording an impairment of $356.1 million ($224.4 million after tax). In the fourth quarter of 2015, the fair value assessment was determined using the market approach based on purchase and sale agreements. The estimated fair value exceeded the carrying value and the Company recorded an impairment reversal of $1.6 million ($1.0 million after tax) in the fourth quarter of 2015. The impairments were included in operating expenses from discontinued operations. The estimated fair value of Fidelity's assets have been categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
The Company incurred transaction costs of approximately $300,000 in the first quarter of 2016 and $2.5 million in 2015. In addition to the transaction costs, and due in part to the change in plans to sell the assets of Fidelity rather than sell Fidelity as a company, Fidelity incurred and expensed approximately $5.6 million of exit and disposal costs in 2016, and has incurred $10.5 million of exit and disposal costs to date. The Company does not expect to incur any additional material exit and disposal costs. The exit and disposal costs are associated with severance and other related matters and exclude the office lease expiration discussed in the following paragraph.
Fidelity vacated its office space in Denver, Colorado in 2016. The Company incurred lease payments of approximately $900,000 in 2016. Lease termination payments of $3.2 million and $3.3 million were made during the second quarter of 2016 and fourth quarter of 2015, respectively. Existing office furniture and fixtures were relinquished to the lessor in the second quarter of 2016.
Historically, the company used the full-cost method of accounting for its oil and natural gas production activities. Under this method, all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties are capitalized and amortized on the units-of-production method based on total proved reserves.
Prior to the oil and natural gas properties being classified as held for sale, capitalized costs were subject to a "ceiling test" that limits such costs to the aggregate of the present value of future net cash flows from proved reserves discounted at 10 percent, as mandated under the rules of the SEC, plus the cost of unproved properties not subject to amortization, plus the effects of cash flow hedges, less applicable income taxes. Proved reserves and associated future cash flows are determined based on SEC Defined Prices and exclude cash outflows associated with asset retirement obligations that have been accrued on the balance sheet. If capitalized costs, less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, exceed the full-cost ceiling at the end of any quarter, a permanent noncash write-down is required to be charged to earnings in that quarter regardless of subsequent price changes.
The Company's capitalized cost under the full-cost method of accounting exceeded the full-cost ceiling at March 31, 2015. SEC Defined Prices, adjusted for market differentials, were used to calculate the ceiling test. Accordingly, the Company was required to write down its oil and natural gas producing properties. The Company recorded a $500.4 million ($315.3 million after tax) noncash write-down in operating expenses from discontinued operations in the first quarter of 2015.
Fidelity previously held commodity derivatives that were not designated as hedging instruments. The amount of loss recognized in discontinued operations, before tax, was $18.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2015.
Dakota Prairie Refining and Fidelity The reconciliation of the major classes of income and expense constituting pretax income (loss) from discontinued operations which includes Dakota Prairie Refining and Fidelity, to the after-tax lossincome (loss) from discontinued operations on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Operating revenues$465
$123,024
$363,115
$103
$(459)$465
Operating expenses(4,607)513,813
1,666,941
290
921
(4,607)
Operating income (loss)5,072
(390,789)(1,303,826)(187)(1,380)5,072
Other income (expense)(13)306
3,149

12
(13)
Interest expense250
1,753
2,124

575
250
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes4,809
(392,236)(1,302,801)(187)(1,943)4,809
Income taxes*8,592
(91,882)(468,721)(474)(4,875)8,592
Loss from discontinued operations(3,783)(300,354)(834,080)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
(131,691)(35,256)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to the Company$(3,783)$(168,663)$(798,824)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations$287
$2,932
$(3,783)

*
Includes eliminations for the presentation of income tax adjustments between continuing and discontinued operations.operations.
 

Note 5 - Leases
Most of the leases the Company enters into are for equipment, buildings, easements and vehicles as part of their ongoing operations. The Company also leases certain equipment to third parties through its utility and construction services segments. The Company determines if an arrangement contains a lease at inception of a contract and accounts for all leases in accordance with ASC 842 - Leases. For more information on the adoption of ASC 842, see Note 1.

 
7082 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

The pretax income (loss) from discontinuedrecognition of leases requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the lease classification and the assets and liabilities recorded. The accuracy of lease assets and liabilities reported on the Consolidated Financial Statements depends on, among other things, management's estimates of interest rates used to discount the lease assets and liabilities to their present value, as well as the lease terms based on the unique facts and circumstances of each lease.
Lessee accounting
The leases the Company has entered into as part of its ongoing operations attributableare considered operating leases and are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as right-of-use assets, current lease liabilities and, if applicable, noncurrent lease liabilities. The corresponding lease costs are included in operation and maintenance expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Generally, the leases for vehicles and equipment have a term of five years or less and buildings and easements have a longer term of up to 35 years or more. To date, the Company does not have any residual value guarantee amounts probable of being owed to a lessor, financing leases or material agreements with related parties.
The following tables provide information on the Company's operating leases at and for the year ended December 31, 2019:
 (In thousands)
Lease costs: 
Operating lease cost$43,759
Variable lease cost1,555
Short-term lease cost120,030
Total lease costs$165,344
 (Dollars in thousands)
Weighted average remaining lease term3.13 years
Weighted average discount rate4.41%
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities$43,477

The reconciliation of the future undiscounted cash flows to the operating lease liabilities presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2019, was as follows:
 (In thousands)
2020$35,156
202124,893
202216,932
202310,227
20247,368
Thereafter47,926
Total142,502
Less discount27,096
Total operating lease liabilities$115,406
The undiscounted annual minimum lease payments due under the Company's leases following the previous lease accounting standard as of December 31, 2018, were as follows:
 2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
 (In thousands)
Operating leases$37,740
$26,255
$17,868
$11,647
$7,278
$49,098

Lessor accounting
The Company relatedleases certain equipment to the operationsthird parties, which are considered operating leases. The Company recognized revenue from operating leases of and activity associated with Dakota Prairie Refining, was $6.9 million, $(253.5) million and $(31.5)$51.5 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2019.
The majority of the Company's operating leases are short-term leases of less than 12 months. At December 31, 2019, the Company had $11.3 million of lease receivables with a majority due within 12 months or less.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 83



Part II

Note 36 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, were as follows:
Balance at January 1, 2017
 
Goodwill Acquired
During the Year

 Balance at December 31, 2017
Balance at January 1, 2019
Goodwill Acquired
During the Year

Measurement Period
Adjustments

Balance at December 31, 2019
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Natural gas distribution$345,736
 $
 $345,736
$345,736
$
$
$345,736
Construction materials and contracting176,290
 
 176,290
209,421
14,482
(6,669)217,234
Construction services109,765
 
 109,765
109,765
8,623

118,388
Total$631,791
 $
 $631,791
$664,922
$23,105
$(6,669)$681,358

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, were as follows:
 Balance at January 1, 2016
Goodwill Acquired
During the Year

 Less Held for Sale
 Balance at December 31, 2016
 (In thousands)
Natural gas distribution$345,736
 $
 $
 $345,736
Pipeline and midstream9,737
 
 9,737
 
Construction materials and contracting176,290
 
 
 176,290
Construction services103,441
 6,324
 
 109,765
Total$635,204
 $6,324
 $9,737
 $631,791
*
Balance is presented net of accumulated impairment of $12.3 million at the pipeline and midstream segment, which occurred in prior periods.
 Balance at January 1, 2018
Goodwill Acquired
During the Year

Measurement Period
Adjustments

Balance at December 31, 2018
 (In thousands)
Natural gas distribution$345,736
$
$
$345,736
Construction materials and contracting176,290
33,131

209,421
Construction services109,765


109,765
Total$631,791
$33,131
$
$664,922

During 2019 and 2018, the Company completed three and four business combinations, respectively, and the results of these acquisitions have been included in the Company's construction materials and contracting and construction services segments. These business combinations increased the construction materials and contracting segment's goodwill balance at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and increased the construction services segment's goodwill balance at December 31, 2019, as noted in the previous tables. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the impacts of these business combinations on other intangible assets resulted in an increase of $6.8 million and $8.2 million, respectively. For more information related to these business combinations, see Note 3.
Other amortizable intangible assets at December 31 were as follows:
2017
2016
2019
2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Customer relationships$15,248
$17,145
$17,958
$22,720
Less accumulated amortization13,382
13,917
6,268
13,535
1,866
3,228
11,690
9,185
Noncompete agreements2,430
2,430
3,439
2,605
Less accumulated amortization1,805
1,658
1,957
1,956
625
772
1,482
649
Other6,990
7,768
8,094
6,458
Less accumulated amortization5,644
5,843
6,020
5,477
1,346
1,925
2,074
981
Total$3,837
$5,925
$15,246
$10,815

Amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 20172019, 20162018 and 20152017, was $2.0$2.4 million, $2.51.2 million and $2.52.0 million, respectively. EstimatedThe amounts of estimated amortization expense for identifiable intangible assets is $1.3 million in as of December 31, 2019, were:
 2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
 (In thousands)
Amortization expense$3,365
$2,016
$1,968
$1,924
$1,610
$4,363
2018, $1.0 million in 2019, $500,000 in 2020, $300,000 in 2021, $200,000 in 2022 and $500,000 thereafter.

 
84 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K71



Part II
 

Note 47 - Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following table summarizes the individual components of unamortized regulatory assets and liabilities as of December 31:
Estimated Recovery
Period
*2017
2016
Estimated Recovery
Period
*2019
2018
 (In thousands) (In thousands)
Regulatory assets:    
Pension and postretirement benefits (a)(e) $163,896
$176,025
(e) $157,069
$165,898
Natural gas costs recoverable through rate adjustments (a) (b)Up to 3 years 89,204
42,652
Asset retirement obligations (a)Over plant lives 66,000
60,097
Plants to be retired (a)- 32,931

Cost recovery mechanisms (a) (b)Up to 3 years 19,396
17,948
Manufactured gas plant sites remediation (a)- 15,347
17,068
Taxes recoverable from customers (a)Over plant lives 12,073
28,278
Over plant lives 11,486
11,946
Manufactured gas plant sites remediation (a)- 18,213
18,259
Asset retirement obligations (a)Over plant lives 56,078
42,580
Natural gas costs recoverable through rate adjustments (b)Up to 1 year 14,465
2,242
Conservation programs (a) (b)Up to 3 years 7,405
7,494
Long-term debt refinancing costs (a)Up to 20 years 5,563
6,248
Up to 18 years 4,286
4,898
Costs related to identifying generation development (a)Up to 9 years 2,960
3,407
Up to 7 years 2,052
2,508
Other (a) (b)Up to 20 years 27,715
30,281
Up to 19 years 12,221
9,608
Total regulatory assets 300,963
307,320
 $417,397
$340,117
Regulatory liabilities:    
Taxes refundable to customers (c) (d) $249,506
$277,833
Plant removal and decommissioning costs (c) 176,190
176,972
 173,722
173,143
Taxes refundable to customers (c) 279,668
11,010
Natural gas costs refundable through rate adjustments (d) 23,825
29,995
Pension and postretirement benefits (c) 11,056
9,099
 18,065
15,264
Natural gas costs refundable through rate adjustments (d) 28,514
25,580
Other (c) (d) 23,870
19,191
 25,187
25,197
Total regulatory liabilities 519,298
241,852
 $490,305
$521,432
Net regulatory position $(218,335)$65,468
 $(72,908)$(181,315)
*Estimated recovery period for regulatory assets currently being recovered in rates charged to customers.
(a)Included in deferred charges and other assets - other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(b)Included in prepayments and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(c)Included in deferred credits and other liabilities - other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(d)Included in other accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(e)Recovered as expense is incurred or cash contributions are made.
 
The regulatory assets are expected to be recovered in rates charged to customers. A portion of the Company's regulatory assets are not earning a return; however, these regulatory assets are expected to be recovered from customers in future rates. As of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, approximately $269.1$276.5 million and $255.4$313.5 million,, respectively, of regulatory assets were not earning a rate of return.
InDuring the first quarter of 2019 and the fourth quarter of 2017,2018, the Company performed a one-time revaluation of the Company's regulated deferred taxexperienced increased natural gas costs in certain jurisdictions where it supplies natural gas. The Company has recorded these natural gas costs as regulatory assets and liabilities for the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent effective January 1, 2018, as identified in the TCJA. The revaluation of the Company's regulatory deferred tax assets and liabilitiesthey are being deferred as the Company works with the various regulators on a plan for amounts expected to be returned torecovered from customers, as discussed in Note 16. 19.
In February 2019, the fourth quarter of 2017,Company announced that it intends to retire three aging coal-fired electric generating units in early 2021 and early 2022. The Company has accelerated the revaluation ofdepreciation related to these facilities in property, plant and equipment and has recorded the deferred taxdifference between the accelerated depreciation, in accordance with GAAP, and the depreciation approved for rate-making purposes as regulatory assets. The Company expects to recover the regulatory assets and liabilities resultedrelated to the plants to be retired in a decrease of $15.5 million in taxes recoverable from customers and an increase of $270.0 million in taxes refundable to customers. These regulatory amounts are expected to generally be refunded over the remaining life of the related assets as prescribed in the TCJA. The approved regulatory treatment of the impacts of the TCJA by the various regulators may affect the analyses performed.future rates.
If, for any reason, the Company's regulated businesses cease to meet the criteria for application of regulatory accounting for all or part of their operations, the regulatory assets and liabilities relating to those portions ceasing to meet such criteria would be removed from the balance sheet and included in the statement of income or accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the period in which the discontinuance of regulatory accounting occurs.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 85



Part II

Note 58 - Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures its investments in certain fixed-income and equity securities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in income. The Company anticipates using these investments, which consist of an insurance contract, to satisfy its obligations under its unfunded, nonqualified defined benefit plans for executive officers and certain key management employees, and invests in these fixed-income and equity securities for the purpose of earning investment returns and capital appreciation. These investments, which totaled $77.487.0 million and $70.973.8 million at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, respectively, wereare classified as investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net unrealized gains on these investments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 2015,2017, were $9.3 million, $3.413.2 million and

72 MDU Resources Group, Inc. $9.3 million, respectively. The net unrealized loss on these investments for the year ended December 31, Form 10-K2018



Part II

, was $1.73.6 million, respectively.. The change in fair value, which is considered part of the cost of the plan, is classified in operation and maintenance expenseother income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company did not elect the fair value option, which records gains and losses in income, for its available-for-sale securities, which include mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury securities. These available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value and are classified as investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Unrealized gains or losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Details of available-for-sale securities were as follows:
December 31, 2017Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

Fair Value
December 31, 2019Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

Fair Value
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities$10,342
$4
$129
$10,217
$9,804
$87
$10
$9,881
U.S. Treasury securities205

1
204
1,228
1

1,229
Total$10,547
$4
$130
$10,421
$11,032
$88
$10
$11,110
December 31, 2016Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

Fair Value
December 31, 2018Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

Fair Value
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities$10,546
$8
$105
$10,449
$10,473
$21
$162
$10,332
U.S. Treasury securities179


179
Total$10,546
$8
$105
$10,449
$10,652
$21
$162
$10,511

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value ASC establishes a hierarchy for grouping assets and liabilities, based on the significance of inputs.
The estimated fair values of the Company's assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis are determined using the market approach.
The Company's Level 2 money market funds are valued at the net asset value of shares held at the end of the period, based on published market quotations on active markets, or using other known sources including pricing from outside sources.
The estimated fair value of the Company's Level 2 mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury securities are based on comparable market transactions, other observable inputs or other sources, including pricing from outside sources.
The estimated fair value of the Company's Level 2 insurance contract is based on contractual cash surrender values that are determined primarily by investments in managed separate accounts of the insurer. These amounts approximate fair value. The managed separate accounts are valued based on other observable inputs or corroborated market data.
Though the Company believes the methods used to estimate fair value are consistent with those used by other market participants, the use of other methods or assumptions could result in a different estimate of fair value. For the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, there were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2.

 
86 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K73



Part II
 

The Company's assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2017, Using
 
Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2019, Using
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2017
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2019
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Assets:  
Money market funds$
$6,965
$
$6,965
$
$8,440
$
$8,440
Insurance contract*
77,388

77,388

87,009

87,009
Available-for-sale securities:  
Mortgage-backed securities
10,217

10,217

9,881

9,881
U.S. Treasury securities
204

204

1,229

1,229
Total assets measured at fair value$
$94,774
$
$94,774
$
$106,559
$
$106,559
*
The insurance contract invests approximately 4951 percent in fixed-income investments, 23 percent in common stock of large-cap companies, 1412 percent in common stock of mid-cap companies, 1110 percent in common stock of small-cap companies, 23 percent in target date investments and 1 percent in cash equivalents.
 
Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2016, Using
 
Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2018, Using
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2016
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Assets:  
Money market funds$
$1,602
$
$1,602
$
$10,799
$
$10,799
Insurance contract*
70,921

70,921

73,838

73,838
Available-for-sale securities:  
Mortgage-backed securities
10,449

10,449

10,332

10,332
U.S. Treasury securities
179

179
Total assets measured at fair value$
$82,972
$
$82,972
$
$95,148
$
$95,148
*The insurance contract invests approximately 5253 percent in fixed-income investments, 2221 percent in common stock of large-cap companies, 1311 percent in common stock of mid-cap companies, 10 percent in common stock of small-cap companies, 13 percent in target date investments and 2 percent in cash equivalents.
 
The Company applies the provisions of the fair value measurement standard to its nonrecurring, non-financial measurements, including long-lived asset impairments. These assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances. The Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
DuringIn the second quarter of 2015, coalbed2019, the Company reviewed a non-utility investment at its electric and natural gas gathering assets at the pipelinedistribution segments for impairment. This was a cost-method investment and midstream segment were reviewed for impairment and found to be impaired and werewas written down to their estimated fair value0 using the income approach. Under this approach to determine its fair value, is determined by using the present value of future estimated cash flows. The factors used to determine the estimated future cash flows include, but are not limited to, internal estimates of gathering revenue, future commodity prices and operating costs and equipment salvage values. The estimated cash flows are discounted using a rate that approximates the weighted average cost of capital of a market participant. These fair value inputs are not typically observable. At June 30, 2015, natural gas gathering assets were written down to the nonrecurring fair value measurement of $1.1 million.
During the third quarter of 2015,requiring the Company was negotiating the saleto record a write-down of certain non-strategic natural gas gathering assets at the pipeline and midstream segment and as a result these assets were found to be impaired and were written down to their estimated fair value using the market approach.$2.0 million, before tax. The estimated fair value of natural gas gathering assets that were impaired at September 30, 2015,this investment was largely determined by agreed upon pricing in a purchase and sale agreement that the Company was negotiating, and these assets were soldcategorized as Level 3 in the fourth quarter of 2015. At September 30, 2015, natural gas gathering assets were written down to the nonrecurring fair value measurementhierarchy. The reduction is reflected in investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, as well as within other income on the Consolidated Statement of $10.8 million.Income.
The Company performed a fair value assessment of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combinations that occurred during 2019 and 2018. For more information on these Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements, see Note 3.

 
74 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K87



Part II
 

The fair value of these natural gas gathering assets have been categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
The Company performed a fair value assessment of the assets and liabilities classified as held for sale. For more information on these Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurements, see Note 2.
The Company's long-term debt is not measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the fair value is being provided for disclosure purposes only. The fair value was categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy and was based on discounted future cash flows using current market interest rates. The estimated fair value of the Company's Level 2 long-term debt at December 31 was as follows:
 20172016
 
Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

 (In thousands)
Long-term debt$1,714,853
$1,826,256
$1,790,159
$1,841,885
 20192018
 (In thousands)
Carrying Amount$2,243,107
$2,108,695
Fair Value$2,418,631
$2,183,819

The carrying amounts of the Company's remaining financial instruments included in current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair values.
Note 69 - Debt
Certain debt instruments of the Company and itsCompany's subsidiaries, including those discussed later, contain restrictive and financial covenants and cross-default provisions. In order to borrow under the respective creditdebt agreements, the Company and its subsidiariessubsidiary companies must be in compliance with the applicable covenants and certain other conditions.conditions, all of which the subsidiaries, as applicable, were in compliance with at December 31, 2019. In the event the Company and its subsidiaries do not comply with the applicable covenants and other conditions, alternative sources of funding may need to be pursued.
The following table summarizes the outstanding revolving credit facilities of the Company and itsCompany's subsidiaries:
CompanyFacility 
Facility
Limit

 Amount Outstanding at December 31, 2017
 
Amount Outstanding at December 31,
 2016

 
Letters of
Credit at December 31, 2017

 
Expiration
Date
Facility 
Facility
Limit

 Amount Outstanding at December 31, 2019
 
Amount Outstanding at December 31,
 2018

 
Letters of
Credit at December 31, 2019

 
Expiration
Date
  (In millions)  (In millions)
MDU Resources Group, Inc.Commercial paper/Revolving credit agreement(a)$175.0
 $73.8
(b)$111.0
(b)$
 5/8/19
Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.Commercial paper/Revolving credit agreement(a)$175.0
 $118.6
(b)$48.5
 $
 12/19/24
Cascade Natural Gas CorporationRevolving credit agreement $75.0
(c)$17.3
 $
 $2.2
(d)4/24/20Revolving credit agreement $100.0
(c)$64.6
 $53.8
 $2.2
(d)6/7/24
Intermountain Gas CompanyRevolving credit agreement $85.0
(e)$40.0
 $20.9
 $
 4/24/20Revolving credit agreement $85.0
(e)$24.5
 $56.3
 $1.4
(d)6/7/24
Centennial Energy Holdings, Inc.Commercial paper/Revolving credit agreement(f)$500.0
 $14.6
(b)$151.0
(b)$
 9/23/21Commercial paper/Revolving credit agreement(f)$600.0
 $104.3
(b)$289.6
(b)$
 12/19/24
(a)The commercial paper program is supported by a revolving credit agreement with various banks (provisions allow for increased borrowings, at the option of the CompanyMontana-Dakota on stated conditions, up to a maximum of $225.0 million). There were no0 amounts outstanding under the revolving credit agreement.agreement at December 31, 2019, and $48.5 million was outstanding at December 31, 2018.
(b)Amount outstanding under commercial paper program.
(c)Certain provisions allow for increased borrowings, up to a maximum of $100.0$125.0 million.
(d)Outstanding letter(s) of credit reduce the amount available under the credit agreement.
(e)Certain provisions allow for increased borrowings, up to a maximum of $110.0 million.
(f)The commercial paper program is supported by a revolving credit agreement with various banks (provisions allow for increased borrowings, at the option of Centennial on stated conditions, up to a maximum of $600.0$700.0 million). There were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit agreement.
 

The Company's and Centennial's respective commercial paper programs are supported by revolving credit agreements. While the amount of commercial paper outstanding does not reduce available capacity under the respective revolving credit agreements, the CompanyMontana-Dakota and Centennial do not issue commercial paper in an aggregate amount exceeding the available capacity under their credit agreements. The commercial paper borrowings may vary during the period, largely the result of fluctuations in working capital requirements due to the seasonality of certain operations of the construction businesses.Company's subsidiaries.

88 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

The following includes information related to the preceding table.
Long-term debt
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Long-term Debt Outstanding Long-term debt outstanding was as follows:
 Weighted Average Interest Rate at December 31, 2019
2019
2018
  (In thousands)
Senior Notes due on dates ranging from October 22, 2022 to November 18, 20594.45%$1,850,000
$1,381,000
Commercial paper supported by revolving credit agreements2.04%222,900
338,100
Term Loan Agreement due on September 3, 20322.00%9,100
209,800
Credit agreements due on June 7, 20244.40%89,050
110,100
Medium-Term Notes due on dates ranging from September 1, 2020 to March 16, 20296.68%50,000
50,000
Other notes due on dates ranging from July 15, 2021 to November 30, 20384.48%29,117
25,229
Less unamortized debt issuance costs 7,010
5,207
Less discount 50
327
Total long-term debt 2,243,107
2,108,695
Less current maturities 16,540
251,854
Net long-term debt $2,226,567
$1,856,841

Montana-Dakota On January 1, 2019, the Company's revolving credit agreement and commercial paper program became Montana-Dakota's revolving credit agreement and commercial paper program as a result of the Holding Company Reorganization. The Company'soutstanding balance of the revolving credit agreement was also transferred to Montana-Dakota. All of the related terms and covenants of the credit agreements remained the same. For more information on the reorganization, see Note 1.
On December 19, 2019, Montana-Dakota amended and restated its revolving credit agreement extending the maturity date to December 19, 2024. Montana-Dakota's revolving credit agreement supports its commercial paper program. Commercial paper borrowings under this agreement are classified as long-term debt as they are intended to be refinanced on a long-term basis through continued commercial paper borrowings.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 75



Part II

The credit agreement contains customary covenants and provisions, including covenants of the CompanyMontana-Dakota not to permit, as of the end of any fiscal quarter, (A) the ratio of funded debt to total capitalization (determined on a consolidated basis) to be greater than 65 percent or (B) the ratio of funded debt to capitalization (determined with respect to the Company alone, excluding its subsidiaries) to be greater than 65 percent. Other covenants include limitations on the sale of certain assets and on the making of certain loans and investments.
There are no credit facilities that contain cross-defaultOn July 24, 2019, Montana-Dakota entered into a $200.0 million note purchase agreement with maturity dates ranging from October 17, 2039 to November 18, 2059, at a weighted average interest rate of 3.95 percent. The agreement contains customary covenants and provisions, betweenincluding a covenant of Montana-Dakota not to permit, at any time, the Company and anyratio of its subsidiaries.total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 65 percent.
Montana-Dakota's ratio of total debt to total capitalization at December 31, 2019, was 52 percent.
Cascade Natural Gas Corporation On June 7, 2019, Cascade amended its revolving credit agreement to increase the borrowing capacity to $100.0 million and extend the maturity date to June 7, 2024. Any borrowings under the revolving credit agreement are classified as long-term debt as they are intended to be refinanced on a long-term basis through continued borrowings.
On April 25, 2017, Cascade amended its revolving credit agreement to increase the borrowing limit from $50.0 million to $75.0 million and extend the termination date from July 9, 2018 to April 24, 2020. The credit agreement contains customary covenants and provisions, including a covenant of Cascade not to permit, at any time, the ratio of total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 65 percent. Other covenants include restrictions on the sale of certain assets, limitations on indebtedness and the making of certain investments.
On June 13, 2019, Cascade issued $75.0 million of senior notes with maturity dates ranging from June 13, 2029 to June 13, 2049, at a weighted average interest rate of 3.93 percent. The agreement contains customary covenants and provisions, including a covenant of Cascade not to permit, at any time, the ratio of total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 65 percent.
Cascade's ratio of total debt to total capitalization at December 31, 2019, was 53 percent.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 89



Part II

Intermountain On June 7, 2019, Intermountain amended its revolving credit agreement also contains cross-default provisions. These provisions state that if Cascade fails to make any payment with respectextend the maturity date to any indebtedness or contingent obligation, in excess of a specified amount, under any agreement that causes such indebtedness to be due prior to its stated maturity or the contingent obligation to become payable, Cascade will be in default under the revolving credit agreement.
Intermountain Gas Company June 7, 2024. Any borrowings under the revolving credit agreement are classified as long-term debt as they are intended to be refinanced on a long-term basis through continued borrowings.
On April 25, 2017, Intermountain amended its revolving credit agreement to increase the borrowing limit from $65.0 million to $85.0 million and extend the termination date from July 13, 2018 to April 24, 2020. The credit agreement contains customary covenants and provisions, including a covenant of Intermountain not to permit, at any time, the ratio of total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 65 percent. Other covenants include restrictions on the sale of certain assets, limitations on indebtedness and the making of certain investments.
On June 13, 2019, Intermountain issued $50.0 million of senior notes with maturity dates ranging from June 13, 2029 to June 13, 2049, at a weighted average interest rate of 3.92 percent. The agreement contains customary covenants and provisions, including a covenant of Intermountain not to permit, at any time, the ratio of total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 65 percent.
Intermountain's ratio of total debt to total capitalization at December 31, 2019, was 50 percent.
Centennial On December 19, 2019, Centennial amended and restated its revolving credit agreement also contains cross-default provisions. These provisions state that if Intermountain fails to make any payment with respectincrease the borrowing capacity to any indebtedness or contingent obligation, in excess of a specified amount, under any agreement that causes such indebtedness$600.0 million and extend the maturity date to be due prior to its stated maturity or the contingent obligation to become payable, or certain conditions result in an early termination date under any swap contract that is in excess of a specified amount, then Intermountain will be in default under the revolving credit agreement.
Centennial Energy Holdings, Inc.December 19, 2024. Centennial's revolving credit agreement supports its commercial paper program. Commercial paper borrowings under this agreement are classified as long-term debt as they are intended to be refinanced on a long-term basis through continued commercial paper borrowings.
Centennial's revolving credit agreement and certain debt outstanding under an expired uncommitted long-term master shelf agreement containcontains customary covenants and provisions, including a covenant of Centennial, not to permit, as of the end of any fiscal quarter, the ratio of total consolidated debt to total consolidated capitalization to be greater than 65 percent (for the revolving credit agreement) and a covenant of Centennial and certain of its subsidiaries, not to permit, as of the end of any fiscal quarter, the ratio of total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 60 percent (for the master shelf agreement). The master shelf agreement also includes a covenant that does not permit the ratio of Centennial's EBITDA to interest expense, for the 12-month period ended each fiscal quarter, to be less than 1.75 to 1.percent. Other covenants include restricted payments, restrictions on the sale of certain assets, limitations on subsidiary indebtedness, minimum consolidated net worth, limitations on priority debt and the making of certain loans and investments.
On April 4, 2019, Centennial issued $150.0 million of senior notes with maturity dates ranging from April 4, 2029 to April 4, 2034, at a weighted average interest rate of 4.60 percent. The agreement contains customary covenants and provisions, including a covenant of Centennial not to permit, at any time, the ratio of total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 60 percent.
Centennial's ratio of total debt to total capitalization at December 31, 2019, was 34 percent.
Certain of Centennial's financing agreements contain cross-default provisions. These provisions state that if Centennial or any subsidiary of Centennial fails to make any payment with respect to any indebtedness or contingent obligation, in excess of a specified amount, under any agreement that causes such indebtedness to be due prior to its stated maturity or the contingent obligation to become payable, the applicable agreements will be in default.
WBI Energy Transmission Inc. On July 26, 2019, WBI Energy Transmission has a $200.0 millionamended its uncommitted note purchase and private shelf agreement to increase capacity to $300.0 million and extend the issuance period to May 16, 2022. On December 16, 2019, WBI Energy Transmission issued $45.0 million of senior notes under the private shelf agreement with an expirationa maturity date of MayDecember 16, 2019.2034, at an interest rate of 4.17 percent. WBI Energy Transmission had $100.0$170.0 million of notes outstanding at December 31, 2017,2019, which reduced the remaining capacity under this uncommitted private shelf agreement to $100.0$130.0 million. This agreement contains customary covenants and provisions, including a covenant of WBI Energy Transmission not to permit, as of the end of any fiscal quarter, the ratio of total debt to total capitalization to be greater than 55 percent. Other covenants include a limitation on priority debt and restrictions on the

76 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

sale of certain assets and the making of certain investments. On December 22, 2017,
WBI Energy Transmission contractedTransmission's ratio of total debt to issue an additional $40.0 million under the private shelf agreementtotal capitalization at an interest rate of 4.18 percent on June 15, 2018.
Long-term Debt Outstanding Long-term debt outstandingDecember 31, 2019, was as follows:
 Weighed Average Interest Rate at December 31, 2017December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
  (In thousands)
Senior Notes due on dates ranging from June 19, 2018 to January 15, 20554.71%$1,499,916
$1,437,831
Commercial paper supported by revolving credit agreements1.72%88,350
262,000
Medium-Term Notes due on dates ranging from September 1, 2020 to March 16, 20296.68%50,000
50,000
Other notes due on dates ranging from July 1, 2019 to November 30, 20385.24%24,982
24,471
Credit agreements due on April 24, 20203.71%57,300
21,793
Less unamortized debt issuance costs 5,694
5,832
Less discount 1
104
Total long-term debt 1,714,853
1,790,159
Less current maturities 148,499
43,598
Net long-term debt $1,566,354
$1,746,561

40 percent.
Schedule of Debt Maturities Long-term debt maturities, which excludes unamortized debt issuance costs and discount, for the five years and thereafter following December 31, 2017,2019, were as follows:
 20182019202020212022Thereafter
 (In thousands)
Long-term debt maturities$148,499
$125,504
$73,012
$15,312
$147,214
$1,211,007
 20202021202220232024Thereafter
 (In thousands)
Long-term debt maturities$16,540
$1,528
$148,021
$77,921
$373,372
$1,632,785


90 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Note 710 - Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company records obligations related to retirement costs of natural gas distribution mains and lines, natural gas transmission lines, natural gas storage facilities,wells, decommissioning of certain electric generating facilities, reclamation of certain aggregate properties, special handling and disposal of hazardous materials at certain electric generating facilities, natural gas distribution facilities and buildings, and certain other obligations as asset retirement obligations.
A reconciliation of the Company's liability, which is included in other accrued liabilities and deferred credits and other liabilities - other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
2017
2016
2019
2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year$314,970
$242,224
$375,553
$341,969
Liabilities incurred15,110
15,114
25,869
13,424
Liabilities acquired486
1,002
Liabilities settled(4,981)(4,338)(7,097)(3,699)
Accretion expense*16,839
13,918
19,789
18,242
Revisions in estimates31
48,052
2,975
4,615
Balance at end of year$341,969
$314,970
$417,575
$375,553

*Includes $15.6$18.3 million and $12.7$16.8 million in 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, related to regulatory assets.
 

The 2016 revisions in estimates consist principally of updated asset retirement obligation costs associated with natural gas transmission lines and storage facilities at the pipeline and midstream segment.
The Company believes that largely all expenses related to asset retirement obligations at the Company's regulated operations will be recovered in rates over time and, accordingly, defers such expenses as regulatory assets. For more information on the Company's regulatory assets and liabilities, see Note 4.7.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 77



Part II

Note 811 - Preferred StocksStock
Preferred stocks atThe Company currently has 2.0 million shares of preferred stock authorized to be issued with a $100 par value. At December 31, 2019, there were as follows:
 2017
2016
(In thousands, except shares
and per share amounts)
 
Authorized:  
Preferred -  
500,000 shares, cumulative, par value $100, issuable in series  
Preferred stock A -  
1,000,000 shares, cumulative, without par value, issuable in series (none outstanding)  
Preference -  
500,000 shares, cumulative, without par value, issuable in series (none outstanding)  
Outstanding:  
4.50% Series - 100,000 shares$
$10,000
4.70% Series - 50,000 shares
5,000
Total preferred stocks$
$15,000

For the years 2016 and 2015, dividends declared on the 4.50% Series and 4.70% Series preferred stocks0 shares outstanding. At December 31, 2018, there were $4.50 and $4.70 per share, respectively.0 shares outstanding. On April 1, 2017, the Company redeemed all outstanding 4.50% Series and 4.70% Series preferred stocks at $105 per share and $102 per share, respectively, for a repurchase price of approximately $15.6 million and $300,000 of redeemable preferred stock classified as long-term debt.
Note 912 - Common Stock
For the years 2017, 2016 and 2015, dividends declared on common stock were $.7750, $.7550 and $.7350 per common share, respectively.
The Stock Purchase Plan provided interested investors the opportunity to make optional cash investments and to reinvest all or a percentage of their cash dividends in shares of the Company's common stock. The K-Plan provides participants the option to invest in the Company's common stock. From January 2015 through August 2015, the Stock Purchase Plan and K-Plan, with respect to Company stock, purchased shares of authorized but unissued common stock from the Company. From September 2015 through December 2017, the K-Plan purchased shares of common stock on the open market. At December 31, 2017, there were 7.8 million shares of common stock reserved for original issuance under the K-Plan. From September 2015 through December 4, 2016, the Stock Purchase Plan purchased shares of common stock on the open market. On December 5, 2016, the Stock Purchase Plan was terminated and all remaining shares reserved for original issuance under the plan were de-registered.
The Company depends on earnings from its divisions and dividends from its subsidiaries to pay dividends on common stock. The Company has paid quarterly dividends for more than 80 consecutive years with an increase in the dividend amount for the last 29 consecutive years. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, dividends declared on common stock were $.8150, $.7950 and $.7750 per common share, respectively. Dividends on common stock are paid quarterly to the stockholders of record less than 30 days prior to the distribution date. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the dividends declared to common stockholders were $162.1 million, $155.7 million and $151.5 million, respectively.
The declaration and payment of dividends of the Company is at the sole discretion of the board of directors, subject to limitations imposed by the Company's credit agreements, federal and state laws, and applicable regulatory limitations.directors. In addition, the Company and CentennialCompany's subsidiaries are generally restricted to paying dividends out of capital accounts or net assets. The following discusses the most restrictive limitations.
Pursuant to a covenant under a credit agreement, Centennial may only declare or pay distributions if as of the last day of any fiscal quarter, the ratio of Centennial's average consolidated indebtedness as of the last day of such fiscal quarter and each of the preceding three fiscal quarters to Centennial's Consolidated EBITDA does not exceed 33.5 to 1;1. In addition, certain credit agreements and after giving effect to such distribution, all distributions made during the 12-month period ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter in which such distribution is made will not exceed the remainder of Centennial's Consolidated EBITDA minus Centennial's capital expenditures less the net cash proceeds from all sales of capital assets from continuing operations, for the immediately preceding 12-month period. Intermountain has regulatory limitations on the amount of dividends it can pay. Based on these limitations, approximately $1.3 billion of the net assets of the Company's subsidiaries were restricted from being used to transfer funds to the Company at December 31, 2017. In addition, the Company's credit agreement also containscontain restrictions on dividend payments. The most restrictive limitation requires the CompanyCompany's subsidiaries not to permit the ratio of funded debt to capitalization (determined with respect to the Company alone, excluding its subsidiaries) to be greater than 65 percent. Based on this limitation, approximately $384 million$1.4 billion of the net assets of the Company's (excluding its subsidiaries) net assets,subsidiaries, which represents common stockholders' equity including retained earnings, would be restricted from use for dividend payments at December 31, 20172019. In addition, state regulatory commissions may require
The Company currently has a shelf registration statement on file with the SEC, under which the Company to maintain certain capitalization ratios. These requirements are not expected to affectmay issue and sell any combination of common stock and debt securities. The Company may sell such securities if warranted by market conditions and the Company's abilitycapital requirements. Any public offer and sale of such securities will be made only by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Company's board of directors currently has authorized the issuance and sale of up to pay dividends in the near term.an aggregate of $1.0 billion worth of such securities.

 
78 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K91



Part II
 

On February 22, 2019, the Company entered into a Distribution Agreement with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and MUFG Securities Americas Inc., as sales agents, with respect to the issuance and sale of up to 10.0 million shares of the Company's common stock in connection with an “at-the-market” offering. The common stock may be offered for sale, from time to time, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement.
The Company issued 3.6 million shares of common stock for the year ended December 31, 2019, pursuant to the “at-the-market” offering. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company received net proceeds of $94.0 million and paid commissions to the sales agents of approximately $950,000 in connection with the sales of common stock under the "at-the-market" offering. The net proceeds were used for capital expenditures and acquisitions. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had remaining capacity to issue up to 6.4 million additional shares of common stock under the "at-the-market" offering program.
The K-Plan provides participants the option to invest in the Company's common stock. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the K-Plan purchased shares of common stock on the open market or issued original issue common stock of the Company. At December 31, 2019, there were 7.3 million shares of common stock reserved for original issuance under the K-Plan.
Note 1013 - Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has several stock-based compensation plans under which it is currently authorized to grant restricted stock and other stock awards. As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were 5.14.6 million remaining shares available to grant under these plans. The Company generallyeither purchases shares on the open market for non-employee directoror issues new shares of common stock awards. The Company purchased shares onto satisfy the open market for the employee performance shares that vested in 2017. The Company anticipates future employee performance share awards will continue to be satisfied by purchasing shares on the open market.vesting of stock-based awards.
Total stock-based compensation expense (after tax) was $6.5 million, $4.6 million and $2.7 million $3.3 millionin 2019, 2018 and $2.9 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, total remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to stock-based compensation was approximately $4.8$9.7 million (before income taxes) which will be amortized over a weighted average period of 1.51.6 years.
Stock awards
Non-employee directors receive shares of common stock in addition to and in lieu of cash payment for directors' fees. Shares of common stock were issued under the non-employee director stock compensation plan or the non-employee director long-term incentive compensation plan.plan in 2019, 2018 and 2017. There were 41,644 shares with a fair value of $1.2 million, 38,605 shares with a fair value of $1.0 million and 40,572 shares with a fair value of $1.1 million 37,218 shares with a fair value of $1.1 million and 58,181 shares with a fair value of $1.1 million issued under these plansto non-employee directors during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.
Restricted stock awards
In February 2018, the Company granted restricted stock awards under the long-term performance-based incentive plan to certain key employees. The restricted stock awards granted will vest after three years. The grant-date fair value is the market price of the Company's stock on the grant date. At December 31, 2019, the total nonvested shares were 22,838 with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $27.48 per share.
Performance share awards
Since 2003, key employees of the Company have been awardedgranted performance share awards each year.year under the long-term performance-based incentive plan. Entitlement to performance shares is based onestablished by either the Company's total shareholder return overmarket condition or the performance metrics and service condition relative to the designated performance periods as measured against a selected peer group.award.
Target grants of performance shares outstanding at December 31, 2017,2019, were as follows:
Grant Date
Performance
Period
Target Grant
of Shares

February 201620182016-20182018-2020258,825
March 20162016-20182,151246,309
February 201720192017-20192019-2021164,558327,194


Participants92 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Under the market condition for these performance share awards, participants may earn from zero0 to 200 percent of the apportioned target grant of shares based on the Company's total shareholder return relative to that of the selected peer group. Compensation expense is based on the grant-date fair value as determined by Monte Carlo simulation. The blended volatility term structure ranges are comprised of 50 percent historical volatility and 50 percent implied volatility. Risk-free interest rates were based on U.S. Treasury security rates in effect as of the grant date. Assumptions used for grants ofapplicable to the market condition for certain performance shares issued in 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 were:
  2017
  2016
  2015
  2019
  2018
  2017
Weighted average grant-date fair value  
$24.31
  
$14.60
  
$18.98
  
$35.07
  
$34.55
  
$24.31
Blended volatility range22.70%25.56%29.25%32.51%22.86%24.61%19.50%19.69%17.87%22.14%22.70%25.56%
Risk-free interest rate range.69%1.61%.47%.92%.05%1.07%2.46%2.55%1.86%2.46%.69%1.61%
Weighted average discounted dividends per share  
$1.70
  
$1.56
  
$1.57
  
$2.85
  
$2.46
  
$1.70

Under the performance conditions for these performance share awards, participants may earn from 0 to 200 percent of the apportioned target grant of shares. The performance conditions are based on the Company's compound annual growth rate in earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization and the Company's compound annual growth rate in earnings from continuing operations. The weighted average grant-date fair value per share for the performance shares applicable to these performance conditions issued in 2019 and 2018 was $26.25 and $27.48, respectively.
The fair value of the performance shares that vested during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2017, was $9.7 million and 2016, was $9.6 million, and $953,000, respectively. There were no0 performance shares that vested in 2015.2018.
A summary of the status of the performance share awards for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, was as follows:
Number of
Shares

Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

Number of
Shares

Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

Nonvested at beginning of period664,188
$21.47
668,791
$23.03
Granted203,646
24.31
327,194
30.66
Additional performance shares earned81,643
19.22
103,159
14.60
Less:    
Vested360,319
24.88
398,919
15.52
Forfeited163,624
24.46
126,722
24.31
Nonvested at end of period425,534
$18.35
573,503
$30.81


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 79



Part II

Note 1114 - Income Taxes
The components of income before income taxes from continuing operations for each of the years ended December 31 were as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
 (In thousands)
United States$350,064
$326,252
$248,379
$398,532
$317,655
$350,064
Foreign(37)(24)(1,326)(87)(784)(37)
Income before income taxes from continuing operations$350,027
$326,228
$247,053
$398,445
$316,871
$350,027


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 93



Part II

Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
 (In thousands)
Current:  
Federal$74,272
$81,989
$85,897
$(3,502)$(15,901)$74,272
State16,192
13,190
10,093
3,366
3,651
16,192
Foreign
2
30
90,464
95,181
96,020
(136)(12,250)90,464
Deferred: 
 
 
 
Income taxes:  
 
 
Federal(24,497)(2,102)(19,632)50,218
50,755
(24,497)
State(864)1,184
(5,304)12,098
7,206
(864)
Investment tax credit - net(62)(1,131)(420)1,099
1,774
(62)
(25,423)(2,049)(25,356)63,415
59,735
(25,423)
Total income tax expense$65,041
$93,132
$70,664
$63,279
$47,485
$65,041

In accordance with the accounting guidance on accounting for income taxes, the tax effects of the change in tax laws or rates are to be recorded in the period of enactment. The TCJA was enacted on December 22, 2017, as discussed in Note 1. Therefore, the reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent required the Company to prepare a one-time revaluation of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities in the fourth quarter of 2017, the period of enactment. The deferred taxes were revalued at the new tax rate because deferred taxes should reflect what the Company expects to pay or receive in future periods under the applicable tax rate. As a result of the revaluation, the Company reduced the value of these assets and liabilities and recorded a tax benefit from continuing operations of $39.5 million on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2017. Included in the tax benefit from continuing operations was income tax expense of $7.7 million related to amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss and $1.0 million related to the Company's assets held for sale.
The Company's regulated operations prepared a one-time revaluation of the Company's regulatory deferred tax assets and liabilities in the fourth quarter of 2017 related to the enactment of the TCJA. The revaluation is beingwas deferred under regulatory accounting as the Company worksworked with the various regulators on a plan forto determine the amount and timing of amounts expected to be returned to customers, as discussedcustomers. In the third quarter of 2018, the Company reversed a regulatory liability recorded in Notes 4 and 16. The revaluation of the deferred tax assets and liabilities2017 based on a FERC final accounting order being issued, which resulted in a net decrease of $285.5$4.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. These regulatory amounts are expected to generally be refunded over the remaining life of the related assets as prescribed in the TCJA. The approved regulatory treatment of the impacts of the TCJA by the various regulators may affect the analyses performed.tax benefit.
The changes included in the TCJA arewere broad and complex. While the Company was able to make reasonable estimates of the impact of the reduction in corporate tax rate on the Company's net deferred tax liabilities, it may be affected by other analyses related to the TCJA, including, but not limited to, the state tax effect of adjustments to federal temporary differences and the calculation of deemed repatriation of deferred foreign income. The final transition impacts of the TCJA may differ from amounts disclosed, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations, legislative action to address questions, changes in accounting standards for income taxes or related interpretations, or updates or changes to estimates the Company has utilized to calculate the transition impacts. The SEC has issued rules that would allowallowed for a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date of the TCJA to finalize the recording of the related tax impacts. The Company currently anticipates finalizingreviewed the impacts of the TCJA and recording any resulting adjustments bycompleted its assessment of the transitional impacts during the period ending December 31, 2018, of which will be included in income from continuing operations.there were no such material adjustments.

 
8094 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Components of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31 were as follows:
2017
2016
2019
2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:  
Postretirement$55,736
$87,872
$51,075
$51,930
Compensation-related16,298
44,995
37,330
29,885
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward37,683
29,338
Federal renewable energy credit19,367
16,944
Operating lease liabilities24,459

Asset retirement obligations7,450
7,083
Customer advances8,712
13,524
7,325
7,734
Legal and environmental contingencies7,363
9,895
6,601
6,729
Asset retirement obligations6,380
8,867
Federal renewable energy credit5,343
8,015
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward
13,404
Other35,738
46,957
32,533
37,347
Total deferred tax assets187,277
258,392
172,116
162,127
Deferred tax liabilities: 
 
 
 
Depreciation and basis differences on property, plant and equipment429,577
774,838
511,867
476,832
Postretirement43,505
70,670
48,927
44,432
Operating lease right-of-use-assets24,436

Intangible asset amortization16,979
26,413
18,930
17,752
Other32,591
45,580
61,385
39,712
Total deferred tax liabilities522,652
917,501
665,545
578,728
Valuation allowance11,896
9,117
13,154
13,484
Net deferred income tax liability$347,271
$668,226
$506,583
$430,085

As of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, the Company had various state income tax net operating loss carryforwards of $130.1$149.8 million and $114.7$153.2 million, respectively, and federal and state income tax credit carryforwards, excluding alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards, of $52.5$43.7 million and $43.3$43.5 million, respectively. Included in the state credits are various regulatory investment tax credits of approximately $28.0$37.4 million and $20.7$32.2 million at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The federal income tax credit carryforwards expire in 2036 and 20372040 if not utilized and state income tax credit carryforwards are due to expire between 20182020 and 2045. It is likely that a portion of the benefit from the state carryforwards will not be realized; therefore, valuation allowances have been provided.2033. Changes in tax regulations or assumptions regarding current and future taxable income could require additional valuation allowances in the future. The alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards are refundable. For information regarding net operating loss carryforwards and valuation allowances related to discontinued operations, see Note 2.
The following table reconciles the change in the net deferred income tax liability from December 31, 20162018, to December 31, 20172019, to deferred income tax benefit:expense:
2017
2019
(In thousands)(In thousands) (In thousands) 
Change in net deferred income tax liability from the preceding table$(320,955)$76,498
Deferred taxes associated with other comprehensive loss1,182
1,631
Deferred taxes associated with TCJA enactment for regulated activities285,520
(11,904)
Other8,830
(2,810)
Deferred income tax benefit for the period$(25,423)
Deferred income tax expense for the period$63,415


 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 8195



Part II
 

Total income tax expense differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes. The reasons for this difference were as follows:
Years ended December 31,201720162015201920182017
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Computed tax at federal statutory rate$122,509
35.0
$114,179
35.0
$86,468
35.0
$83,674
21.0
$66,543
21.0
$122,509
35.0
Increases (reductions) resulting from:     
 
     
 
State income taxes, net of federal income tax10,724
3.1
9,027
2.8
8,208
3.3
14,029
3.5
12,190
3.8
10,724
3.1
Federal renewable energy credit(13,958)(4.0)(13,544)(4.2)(3,400)(1.4)(15,843)(4.0)(11,759)(3.7)(13,958)(4.0)
Tax compliance and uncertain tax positions(643)(.2)(3,028)(.9)(2,607)(1.0)(2,739)(.7)(2,725)(.9)(643)(.2)
Domestic production deduction(6,849)(2.0)(6,251)(1.9)(6,842)(2.8)



(6,849)(2.0)
Excess deferred income tax amortization(11,904)(3.0)(9,319)(2.9)(397)
TCJA revaluation(47,242)(13.5)





(5,947)(1.9)(47,242)(13.5)
TCJA revaluation related to accumulated other comprehensive loss balance7,735
2.2






(42)
7,735
2.2
Other(7,235)(2.0)(7,251)(2.3)(11,163)(4.5)(3,938)(.9)(1,456)(.4)(6,838)(2.0)
Total income tax expense$65,041
18.6
$93,132
28.5
$70,664
28.6
$63,279
15.9
$47,485
15.0
$65,041
18.6

Included in the TCJA is the deemed repatriation transition tax which is a one-time transition tax on previously untaxed accumulated earnings and profits of certain foreign operations that is payable over 8 years. At December 31, 2017, the Company's liability for the deemed repatriation transition tax was $447,000. Historically, deferred income taxes were accrued with respect to the Company's foreign operations.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years ending prior to 2014.2015. With few exceptions, as of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company is no longer subject to state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years ending prior to 2013.2015.
The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest) forFor the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016total reserves for uncertain tax positions were not material. The Company recognizes interest and 2015.
Includedpenalties accrued relative to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense is interest on uncertain tax positions. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized approximately $(99,000), $(92,000) and $122,000, respectively, of interest (income) expense in income tax expense. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had accrued receivables of approximately $46,000 and $54,000, respectively, for interest.
Note 1215 - Cash Flow Information
Cash expenditures for interest and income taxes for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
 (In thousands)
Interest, net*$79,638
$87,920
$88,775
$93,414
$83,009
$79,638
Income taxes paid, net**$112,137
$105,908
$61,405
Income taxes paid (refunded), net**$(8,475)$16,041
$112,137
*Capitalized interest and AFUDC - borrowed was $966,000, $914,000$2.8 million, $2.3 million and $9.3 million$966,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.
**Income taxes paid net of(refunded), including discontinued operations, were $9.7$(9.4) million, $1.3$5.5 million and $2.4$9.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.
 
Noncash investing and financing transactions at December 31 were as follows:
 2017
2016
2015
  (In thousands)
 
Property, plant and equipment additions in accounts payable$29,263
$22,712
$39,754
 2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
Property, plant and equipment additions in accounts payable$46,119
$42,355
$29,263
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition$
$18,186
$
Debt assumed in connection with a business combination$1,163
$
$
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities$54,880
$
$

Note 1316 - Business Segment Data
The Company's reportable segments are those that are based on the Company's method of internal reporting, which generally segregates the strategic business units due to differences in products, services and regulation. The internal reporting of these operating segments is defined based on the reporting and review process used by the Company's chief executive officer. The vast majority of the Company's operations are located within the United States.

82 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

The electric segment generates, transmits and distributes electricity in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming. The natural gas distribution segment distributes natural gas in those states, as well as in Idaho, Minnesota, Oregon and Washington. These operations also supply related value-added services.

96 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

The pipeline and midstream segment provides natural gas transportation, underground storage and gathering services through regulated and nonregulated pipeline systems primarily in the Rocky Mountain and northern Great Plains regions of the United States. This segment also provides cathodic protection and other energy-related services. For information on the Company's natural gas and oil gathering and processing facility sold on January 1, 2017, see Note 2.
The construction materials and contracting segment operations mine, processmines, processes and sellsells construction aggregates (crushed stone, sand and gravel); produceproduces and sellsells asphalt mix; and supplysupplies ready-mixed concrete. This segment focuses on vertical integration of its contracting services with its construction servicesmaterials to support the aggregate based product lines including aggregate placement, asphalt and concrete paving, and site development and grading. Although not common to all locations, other products include the sale of cement, liquid asphalt for various commercial and roadway applications, various finished concrete products and other building materials and related contracting services.Thisservices. This segment operates in the central, southern and western United States, andincluding Alaska and Hawaii.
The construction services segment provides inside and outside specialty contracting services. Its inside services include design, construction and maintenance of electrical and communication wiring and infrastructure, fire suppression systems, and mechanical piping and services. Its outside services include design, construction and maintenance of overhead and underground electrical distribution and transmission lines, substations, external lighting, traffic signalization, and gas pipelines, as well as utility excavation and the manufacture and distribution of transmission line construction equipment. Its inside services include design, construction and maintenance of electrical and communication wiring and infrastructure, fire suppression systems, and mechanical piping and services. This businesssegment also designs, constructs and maintains renewable energy projects. These specialty contracting services are provided to utilities and large manufacturing, commercial, industrial, institutional and government customers.
The Other category includes the activities of Centennial Capital, which, through its subsidiary InterSource Insurance Company, insures various types of risks as a captive insurer for certain of the Company's subsidiaries. The function of the captive insurer is to fund the deductible self-insured layers of the insured companies'Company's general liability, automobile liability, pollution liability and other coverages. Centennial Capital also owns certain real and personal property. TheIn addition, the Other category also includes certain assets, liabilities and tax adjustments of the holding company primarily associated with corporate functions and certain general and administrative costs (reflected in operation and maintenance expense) and interest expense which were previously allocated to the refining business and Fidelity and do not meet the criteria for income (loss) from discontinued operations. The Other category also includes Centennial Resources' former investment in Brazil.
Discontinued operations includesinclude the results and supporting activities of Dakota Prairie Refining and Fidelity other than certain general and administrative costs and interest expense as described above. Dakota Prairie Refining refined crude oil and produced and sold diesel fuel, naphtha, ATBs and other by-products of the production process. In the second quarter of 2016, the Company sold all of the outstanding membership interests in Dakota Prairie Refining. Fidelity engaged in oil and natural gas development and production activities in the Rocky Mountain and Mid-Continent/Gulf States regions of the United States. Between September 2015 and March 2016, the Company entered into purchase and sale agreements to sell substantially all of Fidelity's oil and natural gas assets. The completion of these sales occurred between October 2015 and April 2016. For more information on discontinued operations, see Note 2.4.

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 8397



Part II
 

The information below follows the same accounting policies as described in Note 1. Information on the Company's segments as of December 31 and for the years then ended was as follows:
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
  (In thousands)
 
External operating revenues:  
Regulated operations:  
Electric$342,805
$322,356
$280,615
$351,725
$335,123
$342,805
Natural gas distribution848,388
766,115
817,419
865,222
823,247
848,388
Pipeline and midstream53,566
52,983
51,004
62,357
54,857
53,566
1,244,759
1,141,454
1,149,038
1,279,304
1,213,227
1,244,759
Nonregulated operations:  
Pipeline and midstream19,602
39,602
54,281
21,835
23,161
19,602
Construction materials and contracting1,811,964
1,873,696
1,901,530
2,189,651
1,925,185
1,811,964
Construction services1,366,317
1,072,663
907,767
1,845,896
1,369,772
1,366,317
Other709
1,413
1,436
90
207
709
3,198,592
2,987,374
2,865,014
4,057,472
3,318,325
3,198,592
Total external operating revenues$4,443,351
$4,128,828
$4,014,052
$5,336,776
$4,531,552
$4,443,351
 
Intersegment operating revenues: 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulated operations:  
Electric$
$
$
$
$
$
Natural gas distribution





Pipeline and midstream48,867
48,794
49,065
56,037
50,580
48,867
48,867
48,794
49,065
56,037
50,580
48,867
Nonregulated operations:  
Pipeline and midstream178
223
554
215
325
178
Construction materials and contracting565
574
2,752
1,066
669
565
Construction services1,285
609
18,660
3,370
1,681
1,285
Other7,165
7,230
7,755
16,461
11,052
7,165
9,193
8,636
29,721
21,112
13,727
9,193
Intersegment eliminations(58,060)(57,430)(78,786)(77,149)(64,307)(58,060)
Total intersegment operating revenues$
$
$
$
$
$
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization: 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric$47,715
$50,220
$37,583
$58,721
$50,982
$47,715
Natural gas distribution69,381
65,426
64,756
79,564
72,486
69,381
Pipeline and midstream16,788
24,885
27,981
21,220
17,896
16,788
Construction materials and contracting55,862
58,413
65,937
77,450
61,158
55,862
Construction services15,739
15,307
13,420
17,038
15,728
15,739
Other2,001
2,067
2,070
2,024
1,955
2,001
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization$207,486
$216,318
$211,747
$256,017
$220,205
$207,486
 
Interest expense: 
 
 
Operating income (loss): 
Electric$25,377
$24,982
$17,421
$64,039
$65,148
$79,902
Natural gas distribution31,234
30,405
29,471
69,188
72,336
84,239
Pipeline and midstream4,990
7,903
9,895
42,796
36,128
36,004
Construction materials and contracting14,778
15,265
15,183
179,955
141,426
143,230
Construction services3,742
4,059
3,959
126,426
86,764
81,292
Other3,564
5,854
15,853
(1,184)(79)(619)
Intersegment eliminations(897)(620)(603)
Total interest expense$82,788
$87,848
$91,179
Total operating income$481,220
$401,723
$424,048
 


 
8498 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
  (In thousands)
 
 
Interest expense: 
 
 
Electric$25,334
$25,860
$25,377
Natural gas distribution35,488
30,768
31,234
Pipeline and midstream7,198
5,964
4,990
Construction materials and contracting23,792
17,290
14,778
Construction services5,331
3,551
3,742
Other1,859
2,762
3,564
Intersegment eliminations(415)(1,581)(897)
Total interest expense$98,587
$84,614
$82,788
Income taxes: 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric$7,699
$1,449
$11,523
$(12,650)$(6,482)$7,699
Natural gas distribution22,756
9,181
11,377
1,405
4,075
22,756
Pipeline and midstream12,281
12,408
7,505
7,219
2,677
12,281
Construction materials and contracting5,405
60,625
41,619
37,389
28,357
5,405
Construction services25,558
17,748
16,432
29,973
20,000
25,558
Other(1,809)(2,028)(9,834)(57)(1,142)(1,809)
Intersegment eliminations(6,849)(6,251)(7,958)

(6,849)
Total income taxes$65,041
$93,132
$70,664
$63,279
$47,485
$65,041
 
Earnings (loss) on common stock: 
 
 
Earnings on common stock: 
 
 
Regulated operations:  
Electric$49,366
$42,222
$35,914
$54,763
$47,000
$49,366
Natural gas distribution32,225
27,102
23,607
39,517
37,732
32,225
Pipeline and midstream20,620
22,060
20,680
28,255
26,905
20,620
102,211
91,384
80,201
122,535
111,637
102,211
Nonregulated operations:  
Pipeline and midstream(127)1,375
(7,430)1,348
1,554
(127)
Construction materials and contracting123,398
102,687
89,096
120,371
92,647
123,398
Construction services53,306
33,945
23,762
92,998
64,309
53,306
Other(1,422)(3,231)(14,941)(2,086)(761)(1,422)
175,155
134,776
90,487
212,631
157,749
175,155
Intersegment eliminations (a)6,849
6,251
5,016


6,849
Earnings on common stock before loss from discontinued operations284,215
232,411
175,704
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax (a)(3,783)(300,354)(834,080)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
(131,691)(35,256)
Total earnings (loss) on common stock$280,432
$63,748
$(623,120)
 
Earnings on common stock before income (loss) from discontinued operations335,166
269,386
284,215
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (a)287
2,932
(3,783)
Earnings on common stock$335,453
$272,318
$280,432
Capital expenditures: 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric$109,107
$111,134
$332,876
$99,449
$186,105
$109,107
Natural gas distribution146,981
126,272
130,793
206,799
205,896
146,981
Pipeline and midstream31,054
34,467
18,315
71,477
70,057
31,054
Construction materials and contracting44,302
37,845
48,126
190,092
280,396
44,302
Construction services18,630
60,344
38,269
60,500
25,081
18,630
Other1,850
2,358
3,755
8,181
1,768
1,850
Total capital expenditures (b)$351,924
$372,420
$572,134
$636,498
$769,303
$351,924
  
Assets: 
 
 
Electric (c)$1,470,922
$1,406,694
$1,325,858
Natural gas distribution (c)2,201,081
2,099,296
2,038,433
Pipeline and midstream566,295
550,615
591,651
Construction materials and contracting1,238,696
1,220,459
1,261,963
Construction services591,382
513,093
442,845
Other (d)261,419
283,255
287,940
Assets held for sale4,871
211,055
616,464
Total assets$6,334,666
$6,284,467
$6,565,154
 


 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 8599



Part II
 

2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
  (In thousands)
 
 
Assets: 
 
 
Electric (c)$1,680,194
$1,613,822
$1,470,922
Natural gas distribution (c)2,574,965
2,375,871
2,201,081
Pipeline and midstream677,482
616,959
566,295
Construction materials and contracting1,684,161
1,508,032
1,238,696
Construction services761,127
604,798
591,382
Other (d)303,279
266,111
261,419
Assets held for sale1,851
2,517
4,871
Total assets$7,683,059
$6,988,110
$6,334,666
Property, plant and equipment: 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric (c)$1,982,264
$1,888,613
$1,786,148
$2,227,145
$2,148,569
$1,982,264
Natural gas distribution (c)2,319,845
2,179,413
2,076,581
2,688,123
2,499,093
2,319,845
Pipeline and midstream700,284
672,199
758,729
834,215
764,959
700,284
Construction materials and contracting1,560,048
1,549,375
1,553,428
1,910,562
1,768,006
1,560,048
Construction services177,265
171,361
163,279
213,370
188,586
177,265
Other31,123
49,268
49,537
35,213
28,108
31,123
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization2,691,641
2,578,902
2,489,322
2,991,486
2,818,644
2,691,641
Net property, plant and equipment$4,079,188
$3,931,327
$3,898,380
$4,917,142
$4,578,677
$4,079,188

(a)Includes eliminations for the presentation of income tax adjustments between continuing and discontinued operations.
(b)
Capital expenditures for 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 include noncash transactions such as the issuance of the Company's equity securities in connection with acquisitions, capital expenditure-related accounts payable and AFUDC, totaling $4.8 million, $33.4 million and $10.5 million, $(15.8) million and $35.3 million, respectively.
(c)Includes allocations of common utility property.
(d)Includes assets not directly assignable to a business (i.e. cash and cash equivalents, certain accounts receivable, certain investments and other miscellaneous current and deferred assets).


Note 1417 - Employee Benefit Plans
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans
The Company has noncontributory qualified defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans for certain eligible employees. The Company uses a measurement date of December 31 for all of its pension and postretirement benefit plans.
Prior to 2013, defined benefit pension plan benefits and accruals for all nonunion and certain union plans were frozen. Onfrozen and on June 30, 2015, an additionalthe remaining union plan was frozen. As of June 30, 2015, all of the Company's defined pension plans were frozen. These employees were eligible to receive additional defined contribution plan benefits. In October 2018, the Company transferred the liability of certain participants in the defined benefit pension plan, who are currently receiving benefits, to an annuity company. The transfer of the benefit payments for these participants reduced the Company's liability and future premiums.
Effective January 1, 2010, eligibility to receive retiree medical benefits was modified at certain of the Company's businesses. Employees who had attained age 55 with 10 years of continuous service by December 31, 2010, will bewere provided the current retireeoption to choose between a pre-65 comprehensive medical insurance benefitsplan coupled with a Medicare supplement or can elect the new benefit, if desired,a specified company funded Retiree Reimbursement Account, regardless of when they retire. All other currenteligible employees must meet the new eligibility criteria of age 60 and 10 years of continuous service at the time they retire. These employees willretire to be eligible for a specified company funded Retiree Reimbursement Account. Employees hired after December 31, 2009, will not be eligible for retiree medical benefits at certain of the Company's businesses.
In 2012, the Company modified health care coverage for certain retirees. Effective January 1, 2013, post-65 coverage was replaced by a fixed-dollar subsidy for retirees and spouses to be used to purchase individual insurance through an exchange.

 
86100 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Changes in benefit obligation and plan assets for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, were as follows:
Pension Benefits
Other
Postretirement Benefits
Pension Benefits
Other
Postretirement Benefits
2017
2016
2017
2016
2019
2018
2019
2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:  
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$436,307
$442,960
$89,304
$92,734
$391,602
$445,923
$81,201
$91,206
Service cost

1,508
1,647


1,142
1,494
Interest cost16,207
17,218
3,265
3,688
15,225
14,591
2,986
2,899
Plan participants' contributions

1,368
1,405


1,040
1,282
Actuarial (gain) loss19,119
1,882
1,781
(3,872)40,219
(32,637)2,632
(10,115)
Benefits paid(25,710)(25,753)(6,020)(6,298)(25,880)(36,275)(5,387)(5,565)
Benefit obligation at end of year445,923
436,307
91,206
89,304
421,166
391,602
83,614
81,201
Change in net plan assets: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year333,509
332,667
82,846
82,593
307,809
354,384
82,516
88,739
Actual gain on plan assets45,473
26,595
9,612
4,184
Actual gain (loss) on plan assets58,409
(21,138)15,731
(2,781)
Employer contribution1,112

933
962
24,926
10,838
687
842
Plan participants' contributions

1,368
1,405


1,040
1,281
Benefits paid(25,710)(25,753)(6,020)(6,298)(25,880)(36,275)(5,387)(5,565)
Fair value of net plan assets at end of year354,384
333,509
88,739
82,846
365,264
307,809
94,587
82,516
Funded status - under$(91,539)$(102,798)$(2,467)$(6,458)
Funded status - over (under)$(55,902)$(83,793)$10,973
$1,315
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets at December 31:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred charges and other assets - other$
$
$19,114
$13,131
$
$
$30,475
20,843
Other accrued liabilities

612
538


647
660
Deferred credits and other liabilities - other91,539
102,798
20,969
19,051
55,902
83,793
18,855
18,868
Benefit obligation liabilities - net amount recognized$(91,539)$(102,798)$(2,467)$(6,458)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss or regulatory assets (liabilities) consist of: 
 
 
 
Benefit obligation assets (liabilities) - net amount recognized$(55,902)$(83,793)$10,973
$1,315
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss: 
 
 
 
Actuarial loss$186,486
$198,668
$13,423
$17,470
$27,748
$28,796
$6,118
$6,372
Prior service credit

(11,632)(13,003)

(731)(848)
Total$186,486
$198,668
$1,791
$4,467
$27,748
$28,796
$5,387
$5,524
Amounts recognized in regulatory assets or liabilities: 
 
 
 
Actuarial (gain) loss$155,484
$159,939
$(4,450)$3,944
Prior service credit

(8,109)(9,390)
Total$155,484
$159,939
$(12,559)$(5,446)

Employer contributions and benefits paid in the preceding table include only those amounts contributed directly to, or paid directly from, plan assets. Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss in the above table includes amountsAmounts related to regulated operations which are recorded as regulatory assets (liabilities)or liabilities and are expected to be reflected in rates charged to customers over time. For more information on regulatory assets (liabilities),and liabilities, see Note 4.7.
Unrecognized pension actuarial losses in excess of 10 percent of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of assets are amortized over the average life expectancy of plan participants for frozen plans. The market-related value of assets is determined using a five-year average of assets.
The pension plans all have accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for these plans at December 31 were as follows:
2017
2016
2019
2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Projected benefit obligation$445,923
$436,307
$421,166
$391,602
Accumulated benefit obligation$445,923
$436,307
$421,166
$391,602
Fair value of plan assets$354,384
$333,509
$365,264
$307,809


 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 87101



Part II
 

Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
Pension Benefits
Other
Postretirement Benefits
Pension Benefits
Other
Postretirement Benefits
2017
2016
2015
2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
2019
2018
2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit):  
Service cost$
$
$86
$1,508
$1,647
$1,816
$
$
$
$1,142
$1,494
$1,508
Interest cost16,207
17,218
17,141
3,265
3,688
3,607
15,225
14,591
16,207
2,986
2,899
3,265
Expected return on assets(20,528)(20,924)(22,254)(4,641)(4,533)(4,795)(18,236)(20,753)(20,528)(4,804)(4,866)(4,641)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)

36
(1,371)(1,371)(1,371)
Amortization of prior service credit


(1,398)(1,394)(1,371)
Recognized net actuarial loss6,355
6,215
7,016
857
1,491
1,960
5,548
7,005
6,355
353
640
857
Curtailment loss

258



Net periodic benefit cost (credit), including amount capitalized2,034
2,509
2,283
(382)922
1,217
2,537
843
2,034
(1,721)(1,227)(382)
Less amount capitalized310
381
316
(370)(52)120


310
113
153
(370)
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)1,724
2,128
1,967
(12)974
1,097
2,537
843
1,724
(1,834)(1,380)(12)
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in accumulated comprehensive (income) loss or regulatory assets (liabilities): 
 
 
 
 
 
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in accumulated comprehensive loss: 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (gain) loss(5,827)(3,789)8,257
(3,190)(3,523)(1,336)(144)991
(1,091)(127)(1,735)1,742
Amortization of actuarial loss(6,355)(6,215)(7,016)(857)(1,491)(1,960)(904)(1,084)(1,040)(110)(354)(289)
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit

(294)1,371
1,371
1,371



100
(220)161
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss or regulatory assets (liabilities)(12,182)(10,004)947
(2,676)(3,643)(1,925)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost (credit), accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss and regulatory assets (liabilities)$(10,458)$(7,876)$2,914
$(2,688)$(2,669)$(828)
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,048)(93)(2,131)(137)(2,309)1,614
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in regulatory assets or liabilities: 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (gain) loss189
8,263
(4,736)(8,168)(732)(4,932)
Amortization of actuarial loss(4,644)(5,921)(5,315)(242)(286)(568)
Amortization of prior service credit


1,297
1,614
1,210
Total recognized in regulatory assets or liabilities(4,455)2,342
(10,051)(7,113)596
(4,290)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost (credit), accumulated other comprehensive loss and regulatory assets or liabilities$(2,966)$3,092
$(10,458)$(9,084)$(3,093)$(2,688)

The estimated net loss for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss and regulatory assets or liabilities into net periodic benefit cost in 20182020 is $7.0$7.2 million. The estimated net loss and prior service credit for the other postretirement benefit plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss and regulatory assets or liabilities into net periodic benefit costcredit in 20182020 are $800,000$250,000 and $1.4 million, respectively. Prior service costcredit is amortized on a straight linestraight-line basis over the average remaining service period of active participants.
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31 were as follows:
Pension Benefits
Other
Postretirement Benefits
Pension BenefitsOther
Postretirement Benefits
2017
2016
2017
2016
2019
2018
2019
2018
Discount rate3.38%3.83%3.41%3.86%2.96%4.03%3.00%4.05%
Expected return on plan assets6.75%6.75%5.75%5.75%6.25%6.75%5.75%5.75%
Rate of compensation increaseN/A
N/A
3.00%3.00%N/A
N/A
3.00%3.00%
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
Pension Benefits
Other
Postretirement Benefits
Pension BenefitsOther
Postretirement Benefits
2017
2016
2017
2016
2019
2018
2019
2018
Discount rate3.83%4.00%3.86%4.06%4.03%3.38%4.05%3.41%
Expected return on plan assets6.75%6.75%5.75%5.75%6.25%6.75%5.75%5.75%
Rate of compensation increaseN/A
N/A
3.00%3.00%N/A
N/A
3.00%3.00%
The expected rate of return on pension plan assets is based on a targeted asset allocation range determined by the funded ratio of the plan. As of December 31, 20172019, the expected rate of return on pension plan assets is based on the targeted asset allocation range of 40 percent

102 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

to 50 percent equity securities and 50 percent to 60 percent fixed-income securities and the expected rate of return from these asset categories. The expected rate of return on other postretirement plan assets is based on the targeted asset allocation range of 20 percent to 2530 percent equity securities and 75 percent to 8070 percent fixed-income securities and the expected rate of return from these asset categories. The expected return on plan assets for other postretirement benefits reflects insurance-related investment costs.

88 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

Health care rate assumptions for the Company's other postretirement benefit plans as of December 31 were as follows:
  2017
  2016
2019 2018 
Health care trend rate assumed for next year7.5%8.5%8.6%10.7%7.1%7.4%7.5%8.1%
Health care cost trend rate - ultimate


4.5%

 4.5% 
4.5%  4.5%
Year in which ultimate trend rate achieved 
2024


 2024
 
2024


 2024

The Company's other postretirement benefit plans include health care and life insurance benefits for certain retirees. The plans underlying these benefits may require contributions by the retiree depending on such retiree's age and years of service at retirement or the date of retirement. The accounting forCompany contributes a flat dollar amount to the health care plans anticipates future cost-sharing changes that are consistent with the Company's expressed intent to generally increase retiree contributions each year by the excess of the expected health care cost trend rate over six percent.monthly premiums which is updated annually on January 1.
Assumed health care cost trend rates may have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have had the following effects at December 31, 20172019:
1 Percentage
 Point Increase

1 Percentage
Point Decrease

1 Percentage
 Point Increase

1 Percentage
Point Decrease

(In thousands)(In thousands)
Effect on total of service and interest cost components$306
$(247)$245
$(203)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation$5,433
$(4,551)$3,751
$(3,155)

In 2019, the Company contributed an additional $20.0 million to its defined benefit pension plans, which increased the funded status and decreased future expenses for the plans. The Company does not expect to contribute to its defined benefit pension plans and expects to contribute approximately $660,000 to its postretirement benefit plans in 2020.
The following benefit payments, which reflect future service, as appropriate, and expected Medicare Part D subsidies at December 31, 2019, are as follows:
Years
Pension
Benefits

Other
Postretirement Benefits

Expected
Medicare
Part D Subsidy

  (In thousands)
 
2020$24,128
$5,024
$92
202124,432
5,073
86
202224,642
5,098
80
202324,874
5,091
73
202424,924
5,000
65
2025-2029121,205
24,242
222

Outside investment managers manage the Company's pension and postretirement assets. The Company's investment policy with respect to pension and other postretirement assets is to make investments solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of the plans and for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits accrued and defraying the reasonable expenses of administration. The Company strives to maintain investment diversification to assist in minimizing the risk of large losses. The Company's policy guidelines allow for investment of funds in cash equivalents, fixed-income securities and equity securities. The guidelines prohibit investment in commodities and futures contracts, equity private placement, employer securities, leveraged or derivative securities, options, direct real estate investments, precious metals, venture capital and limited partnerships. The guidelines also prohibit short selling and margin transactions. The Company's practice is to periodically review and rebalance asset categories based on its targeted asset allocation percentage policy.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value ASC establishes a hierarchy for grouping assets and liabilities, based on the significance of inputs.
The estimated fair values of the Company's pension plans' assets are determined using the market approach.
The carrying value of the pension plans' Level 2 cash equivalents approximates fair value and is determined using observable inputs in active markets or the net asset value of shares held at year end, which is determined using other observable inputs including pricing from outside sources.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 103



Part II

The estimated fair value of the pension plans' Level 1 equity securities is based on the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded.
The estimated fair value of the pension plans' Level 1 and Level 2 collective and mutual funds are based on the net asset value of shares held at year end, based on either published market quotations on active markets or other known sources including pricing from outside sources.
The estimated fair value of the pension plans' Level 2 corporate and municipal bonds is determined using other observable inputs, including benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, bids, offers, future cash flows and other reference data.
The estimated fair value of the pension plans' Level 1 U.S. Government securities are valued based on quoted prices on an active market.
The estimated fair value of the pension plans' Level 2 U.S. Government securities are valued mainly using other observable inputs, including benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, bids, offers, to be announced prices, future cash flows and other reference data. Some of these securities are valued using pricing from outside sources.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 89



Part II

Though the Company believes the methods used to estimate fair value are consistent with those used by other market participants, the use of other methods or assumptions could result in a different estimate of fair value. For the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, there were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2.
The fair value of the Company's pension plans' assets (excluding cash) by class were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements
 at December 31, 2017, Using
 
Fair Value Measurements
 at December 31, 2019, Using
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
 Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2017
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
 Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2019
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Assets:  
Cash equivalents$
$3,814
$
$3,814
$
$26,166
$
$26,166
Equity securities:  






 
U.S. companies13,345


13,345
14,457


14,457
International companies1,766


1,766

938

938
Collective and mutual funds*171,822
67,749

239,571
160,906
58,894

219,800
Corporate bonds
74,956

74,956

80,768

80,768
Municipal bonds
16,839

16,839

11,828

11,828
U.S. Government securities1,038


1,038
7,296
2,082

9,378
Total assets measured at fair value$187,971
$163,358
$
$351,329
$182,659
$180,676
$
$363,335
*Collective and mutual funds invest approximately 3129 percent in common stock of international companies, 28 percent in corporate bonds, 1921 percent in common stock of large-cap U.S. companies, 7 percent in cash equivalents, 118 percent in U.S. Government securities, 9 percent in corporate bonds, 6 percent in cash equivalents and 1417 percent in other investments.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 at December 31, 2016, Using
 
Fair Value Measurements
 at December 31, 2018, Using
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
 Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2016
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
 Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Assets:  
Cash equivalents$
$6,347
$
$6,347
$
$4,930
$
$4,930
Equity securities:  






 
U.S. companies11,348


11,348
11,038


11,038
International companies1,584


1,584

967

967
Collective and mutual funds*162,055
64,052

226,107
145,960
51,600

197,560
Corporate bonds
68,677

68,677

73,110

73,110
Municipal bonds
11,002

11,002

10,624

10,624
U.S. Government securities4,352
2,044

6,396
479
5,896

6,375
Total assets measured at fair value$179,339
$152,122
$
$331,461
$157,477
$147,127
$
$304,604
*
Collective and mutual funds invest approximately 2927 percent in common stock of international companies, 2131 percent in corporate bonds, 2018 percent in common stock of large-cap U.S. companies, 85 percent in cash equivalents 7 percent in U.S. Government securities and 1519 percent in other investments.
 


104 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

The estimated fair values of the Company's other postretirement benefit plans' assets are determined using the market approach.
The estimated fair value of the other postretirement benefit plans' Level 2 cash equivalents is valued at the net asset value of shares held at year end, based on published market quotations on active markets, or using other known sources including pricing from outside sources.
The estimated fair value of the other postretirement benefit plans' Level 1 equity securities is based on the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded.

90 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

The estimated fair value of the other postretirement benefit plans' Level 2 insurance contract is based on contractual cash surrender values that are determined primarily by investments in managed separate accounts of the insurer. These amounts approximate fair value. The managed separate accounts are valued based on other observable inputs or corroborated market data.
Though the Company believes the methods used to estimate fair value are consistent with those used by other market participants, the use of other methods or assumptions could result in a different estimate of fair value. For the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, there were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2.
The fair value of the Company's other postretirement benefit plans' assets (excluding cash) by asset class were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements
 at December 31, 2017, Using
 
Fair Value Measurements
 at December 31, 2019, Using
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2017
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2019
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Assets:  
Cash equivalents$
$4,815
$
$4,815
$
$4,017
$
$4,017
Equity securities:  






 
U.S. companies2,316


2,316
2,073


2,073
International companies4


4

1

1
Insurance contract*3
81,601

81,604
10
88,486

88,496
Total assets measured at fair value$2,323
$86,416
$
$88,739
$2,083
$92,504
$
$94,587
*
The insurance contract invests approximately 38 percent in corporate bonds, 23 percent in common stock of large-cap U.S. companies, 21 percent in U.S. Government securities, 9 percent in mortgage-backed securities and 9 percent in other investments.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 at December 31, 2016, Using
 
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2016
 (In thousands)
Assets:    
Cash equivalents$
$250
$
$250
Equity securities:    
U.S. companies2,328


2,328
International companies5


5
Insurance contract*
80,263

80,263
Total assets measured at fair value$2,333
$80,513
$
$82,846
*
The insurance contract invests approximately 3850 percent in corporate bonds, 25 percent in common stock of large-cap U.S. companies, 207 percent in U.S. Government securities, 97 percent in mortgage-backed securitiescommon stock of small-cap U.S. companies and 811 percent in other investments.
 

The Company expects to contribute approximately $17.7 million to its defined benefit pension plans and approximately $800,000 to its postretirement benefit plans in 2018.

 
Fair Value Measurements
 at December 31, 2018, Using
 
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 (Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)

Balance at December 31, 2018
 (In thousands)
Assets:    
Cash equivalents$
$3,866
$
$3,866
Equity securities:





 
U.S. companies1,767


1,767
International companies
2

2
Insurance contract*1
76,880

76,881
Total assets measured at fair value$1,768
$80,748
$
$82,516
*
The insurance contract invests approximately 51 percent in corporate bonds, 23 percent in common stock of large-cap U.S. companies, 7 percent in U.S. Government securities, 7 percent in common stock of small-cap U.S. companies and 12 percent in other investments.
 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 91



Part II

The following benefit payments, which reflect future service, as appropriate, and expected Medicare Part D subsidies are as follows:
Years
Pension
Benefits

Other
Postretirement Benefits

Expected
Medicare
Part D Subsidy

  (In thousands)
 
2018$25,111
$5,490
$152
201925,280
5,525
147
202025,587
5,396
141
202125,866
5,391
132
202226,185
5,470
123
2023 - 2027130,994
27,106
454

Nonqualified benefit plans
In addition to the qualified defined benefit pension benefit plans reflected in the table at the beginning of this note, the Company also has unfunded, nonqualified defined benefit plans for executive officers and certain key management employees that generally provide for defined benefit payments at age 65 following the employee's retirement or, upon death, to their beneficiaries for a 15-year period. In

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 105



Part II

February 2016, the Company froze the unfunded, nonqualified defined benefit plans to new participants and eliminated benefit increases. Vesting for participants not fully vested was retained.
The Company'sprojected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation for these plans at December 31 were as follows:
 2019
2018
 (In thousands)
Projected benefit obligation$99,245
$93,988
Accumulated benefit obligation$99,245
$93,988

Components of net periodic benefit cost for these plans was $4.7 million, $1.8 million and $7.1 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which reflects a curtailment gain of $3.3 million in the first quarter of 2016 . The total projected benefit obligation for these plans was $102.5 million and $101.8 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for these plans was $102.5 million and $101.8 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. A weighted average discount rate of 3.20 percent and 3.56 percent at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, was used to determine the benefit obligation. No rate of compensation increase was used to determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2017 and 2016, due to the plans being froze. A discount rate of 3.56 percent and 3.77 percent for the years ended December 31 2017were as follows:
 2019
2018
2017
 (In thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost:   
Service cost$109
$185
$289
Interest cost3,473
3,157
3,494
Recognized net actuarial loss764
1,047
883
Net periodic benefit cost$4,346
$4,389
$4,666

and 2016, respectively, and a rate of compensation increase of 4.00 percent for the year ended 2016 wasWeighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost.at December 31 were as follows:
 2019
2018
Benefit obligation discount rate2.73%3.86%
Benefit obligation rate of compensation increaseN/A
N/A
Net periodic benefit cost discount rate3.86%3.20%
Net periodic benefit cost rate of compensation increaseN/A
N/A

The amount of future benefit payments for the unfunded, nonqualified defined benefit plans at December 31, 2019, are expected to aggregate $7.1 million in as follows:
 2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2029
 (In thousands)
Nonqualified benefits$7,774
$7,795
$7,023
$7,219
$7,597
$35,998
2018; $7.3 million in 2019; $7.7 million in 2020; $7.7 million in 2021; $7.0 million in 2022 and $37.0 million for the years 2023 through 2027.
In 2012, the Company established a nonqualified defined contribution plan for certain key management employees. Expenses incurred under this plan for 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016were $1.6 million, $597,000 and 2015 were $736,000, $395,000 and $207,000, respectively.
The Company hadamount of investments of $122.9 million and $111.0 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, consisting of equity securities of $68.3 million and $62.5 million, respectively, life insurance carried on plan participants (payable uponthat the employee's death) of $36.5 million and $35.5 million, respectively, and other investments of $18.1 million and $13.0 million, respectively. The Company anticipates using these investments to satisfy obligations under these plans.plans at December 31 was as follows:
 2019
2018
 (In thousands)
Investments  
Insurance contract*$87,009
$73,838
Life insurance**38,659
37,274
Other8,450
10,818
Total investments$134,118
$121,930
*For more information on the insurance contract, see Note 8.    
**Investments of life insurance are carried on plan participants (payable upon the employee's death).

Defined contribution plans
The Company sponsors various defined contribution plans for eligible employees and the costs incurred under these plans were $51.8 million in 2019, $42.4 million in 2018 and $41.2 million in 2017, .

$40.9 million106 MDU Resources Group, Inc. in Form 10-K2016 and $36.8 million in 2015.



Part II

Multiemployer plans
The Company contributes to a number of multiemployer defined benefit pension plansMEPPs under the terms of collective-bargaining agreements that cover its union-represented employees. The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects:
Assets contributed to the MEPP by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers
If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers
If the Company chooses to stop participating in some of its MEPPs, the Company may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability
The Company's participation in these plans is outlined in the following table. Unless otherwise noted, the most recent Pension Protection Act zone status available in 20172019 and 20162018 is for the plan's year-end at December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 2015,2017, respectively. The zone status is based on information that the Company received from the plan and is certified by the plan's actuary. Among other factors, plans in the red zone are generally less than 65 percent funded, plans in the yellow zone are between 65 percent and 80 percent funded, and plans in the green zone are at least 80 percent funded.
 EIN/Pension Plan NumberPension Protection Act Zone StatusFIP/RP Status Pending/ImplementedContributionsSurcharge Imposed
Expiration Date
of Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
 
Pension Fund201920182019
2018
2017
 
     (In thousands)   
Alaska Laborers-Employers Retirement Fund91-6028298-001Yellow as of 6/30/2019Yellow as of 6/30/2018Implemented$815
$732
$690
No12/31/2020 
Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust for So Nevada, Plan A88-0135695-001RedRedImplemented544
346
377
No6/30/2020 
Edison Pension Plan93-6061681-001GreenGreenNo12,252
12,111
12,725
No12/31/2020 
IBEW Local 212 Pension Trust31-6127280-001Green as of 4/30/2019Green as of 4/30/2018No1,110
1,341
1,312
No6/1/2025 
IBEW Local 357 Pension Plan A88-6023284-001GreenGreenNo10,162
3,460
3,286
No5/31/2021 
IBEW Local 648 Pension Plan31-6134845-001Yellow as of 2/28/2019Yellow as of 2/28/2018Implemented728
2,175
2,254
No8/29/2021 
IBEW Local 82 Pension Plan31-6127268-001Green as of 6/30/2019Green as of 6/30/2018No1,662
1,569
1,757
No12/3/2023 
Idaho Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Plan82-6010346-001Green as of 5/31/2019Green as of 5/31/2018No1,307
1,247
1,156
No3/31/2023 
Minnesota Teamsters Construction Division Pension Fund41-6187751-001Green as of 11/30/2018Green as of 11/30/2017No673
740
826
No4/30/2021 
National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund52-6054620-001RedRedImplemented1,074
738
718
No3/31/2021-
7/31/2024
 
National Electrical Benefit Fund53-0181657-001GreenGreenNo12,679
8,468
8,891
No8/31/2019-
6/1/2025
*
Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers94-6090764-001YellowYellowImplemented2,598
2,403
2,391
No3/31/2020-
6/15/2022
 
Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern CA, AZ, and NV95-6052257-001YellowYellowImplemented2,119
1,774
1,016
No6/30/2020 
Southwest Marine Pension Trust95-6123404-001RedRedImplemented132
81
48
No1/31/2024
Other funds



24,670
21,537
19,298


 
Total contributions$72,525
$58,722
$56,745
   
*Plan includes contributions required by collective bargaining agreements which have expired, but contain provisions automatically renewing their terms in the absence of a subsequent negotiated agreement.

 
92 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K107



Part II
 

 EIN/Pension Plan NumberPension Protection Act Zone StatusFIP/RP Status Pending/ImplementedContributionsSurcharge Imposed
Expiration Date
of Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
Pension Fund2017
2016
2017
2016
2015
     (In thousands)  
Alaska Laborers-Employers Retirement Fund91-6028298-001Yellow as of 6/30/2017Yellow as of 6/30/2016Implemented$690
$766
$917
No12/31/2018
Edison Pension Plan93-6061681-001GreenGreenNo12,725
6,242
5,517
No6/30/2019
IBEW Local No. 82 Pension Plan31-6127268-001Green as of 6/30/2017Green as of 6/30/2016No1,757
2,560
2,252
No12/1/2019
IBEW Local 212 Pension Trust Fund31-6127280-001Green as of 4/30/2016Yellow as of 4/30/2015No1,312
1,146
937
No6/2/2019
IBEW Local No. 357 Pension Plan A88-6023284-001GreenGreenNo3,286
3,016
1,896
No5/31/2018
IBEW Local 648 Pension Plan31-6134845-001Red as of 2/28/2017Red as of 2/29/2016Implemented2,254
773
745
No9/2/2018
Idaho Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Plan82-6010346-001Green as of 5/31/2017Green as of 5/31/2016No1,156
1,221
1,169
No9/30/2019
Minnesota Teamsters Construction Division Pension Fund41-6187751-001Green as of 11/30/2016Green as of 11/30/2015No826
690
737
No4/30/2019
National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund52-6054620-001RedRedImplemented718
775
677
No7/31/2018-
3/31/2021
National Electrical Benefit Fund53-0181657-001GreenGreenNo8,891
6,366
5,271
No10/31/2017-
3/31/2021
Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern CA, AZ and NV95-6052257-001YellowRedImplemented1,016
1,087
714
No6/30/2018
Southwest Marine Pension Trust95-6123404-001RedRedImplemented48
50
26
No1/31/2019
Other funds    22,066
19,835
18,254
  
Total contributions$56,745
$44,527
$39,112
  

The Company was listed in the plans' Forms 5500 as providing more than 5 percent of the total contributions for the following plans and plan years:
Pension Fund
Year Contributions to Plan Exceeded More Than 5 Percent
of Total Contributions (as of December 31 of the Plan's Year-End)
Edison Pension Plan20162018 and 20152017
IBEW Local 82 Pension Plan20162018 and 20152017
IBEW Local 124 Pension Trust Fund20162018 and 20152017
IBEW Local 212 Pension Trust Fund20162018 and 20152017
IBEW Local 357 Pension Plan A20162018 and 20152017
IBEW Local 648 Pension Plan20162018 and 20152017
IBEW Local Union No 226 Open End Pension Fund2018
Idaho Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Plan20162018 and 20152017
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Pension Trust Fund20162018 and 20152017
Minnesota Teamsters Construction Division Pension Fund20162018 and 20152017
Pension and Retirement Plan of Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 52520162018 and 20152017

On September 24, 2014, Knife River provided notice to the Operating Engineers Local 800 & WY Contractors Association, Inc. Pension Plan for Wyoming that it was withdrawing from the plan effective October 26, 2014. In the fourth quarter of 2016, Knife River and the plan entered into a settlement agreement whereby the plan administrator assessed Knife River’s final withdrawal liability with quarterly payments of approximately $42,000 until all benefits are satisfied. Knife River discounted the expected future payments. Based on this calculation, Knife River adjusted its liability accrual from $16.4 million to $5.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2016.
The Company also contributes to a number of multiemployer other postretirement plans under the terms of collective-bargaining agreements that cover its union-represented employees. These plans provide benefits such as health insurance, disability insurance and life insurance to retired union employees. Many of the multiemployer other postretirement plans are combined with active multiemployer health and welfare plans. The Company's total contributions to its multiemployer other postretirement plans, which also includes contributions to active multiemployer health and welfare plans, were $59.5 million, $51.9 million and $50.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Amounts contributed in 2019, 2018 and 2017 to defined contribution multiemployer plans were $49.2 million, $31.1 million and $32.2 million, respectively.

 
108 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K93



Part II
 

multiemployer health and welfare plans, were $51.7 million, $36.1 million and $31.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Amounts contributed in 2017, 2016 and 2015 to defined contribution multiemployer plans were $32.2 million, $23.8 million and $19.5 million, respectively.
Note 1518 - Jointly Owned Facilities
The consolidated financial statements include the Company's ownership interests in the assets, liabilities and expenses of the Bigthree coal-fired electric generating facilities (Big Stone Station, Coyote Station and Wygen III.III) and one major transmission line (BSSE). Each owner of the stationsjointly owned facilities is responsible for financing its investment in the jointly owned facilities.investment.
The Company's share of the stationsjointly owned facilities operating expenses was reflected in the appropriate categories of operating expenses (fuel,(electric fuel and purchased power; operation and maintenancemaintenance; and taxes, other than income) in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
At December 31, the Company's share of the cost of utility plant in service, construction work in progress and related accumulated depreciation for the stationsjointly owned facilities was as follows:
2017
2016
Ownership Percentage
2019
2018
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Big Stone Station: 22.7% 
Utility plant in service$158,084
$157,144
 $152,836
$156,534
Construction work in progress 518
92
Less accumulated depreciation 46,266
49,345
 $107,088
$107,281
BSSE:50.0% 
Utility plant in service $105,767
$
Construction work in progress 
105,846
Less accumulated depreciation51,740
49,568
 1,232

$106,344
$107,576
 $104,535
$105,846
Coyote Station: 
 
25.0% 
Utility plant in service$155,287
$156,334
 $160,235
$155,236
Construction work in progress 21
1,920
Less accumulated depreciation103,897
105,928
 107,638
105,565
$51,390
$50,406
 $52,618
$51,591
Wygen III: 
 
25.0% 
Utility plant in service$65,065
$66,251
 $67,869
$65,382
Construction work in progress 112
220
Less accumulated depreciation7,652
7,550
 10,482
9,174
$57,413
$58,701
 $57,499
$56,428

Note 1619 - Regulatory Matters
The Company regularly reviews the need for electric and natural gas rate changes in each of the jurisdictions in which service is provided. The Company files for rate adjustments to seek recovery of operating costs and capital investments, as well as reasonable returns as allowed by regulators. As indicated below, certain regulatory proceedings and cases may also contain recurring mechanisms that can have an annual true-up. Examples of these recurring mechanisms include: infrastructure riders, transmission trackers, renewable resource cost adjustment riders, as well as weather normalization and decoupling mechanisms. The following paragraphs summarizes the Company's most recentsignificant regulatory proceedings and cases by jurisdiction are discussed inincluding the following paragraphs.status of each open request. The jurisdictions in whichCompany is unable to predict the Company provides service have requestedultimate outcome of these matters, the Company furnish plans fortiming of final decisions of the various regulators and courts, or the effect of the reduced corporate tax rate due to the enactment of the TCJA which may impacton the Company's rates. The following paragraphs include additional details on each jurisdiction's request.results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
IPUCMNPUC
On August 12, 2016, IntermountainSeptember 27, 2019, Great Plains filed an application with the IPUCMNPUC for a natural gas rate increase of approximately $10.2$2.9 million annually or approximately 4.112.0 percent above current rates. The request includes rate recoveryrequested increase was primarily to recover investments in facilities to enhance safety and reliability and the depreciation and taxes associated with increased investmentthe increase in facilities and increased operating expenses.investment. On January 17, 2017, Intermountain provided the IPUC withNovember 22, 2019, Great Plains received approval to implement an updated revenue request of approximately $9.4 million. On April 28, 2017, the IPUC issued an order approving aninterim rate increase of approximately $4.1$2.6 million or approximately 1.611.0 percent, above current rates based on a 9.5 percent return on equitysubject to refund, effective with service rendered on and after MayJanuary 1, 2017. 2020. This matter is pending before the MNPUC.
MTPSC
On May 18, 2017, Intermountain filed a petition for reconsiderationNovember 1, 2019, Montana-Dakota submitted an application with the IPUCMTPSC requesting the reconsiderationuse of certain items denieddeferred accounting for the treatment of costs related to the retirement of Lewis & Clark Station in Sidney, Montana, and units 1 and 2 at Heskett Station near Mandan, North Dakota. This matter is pending before the order dated April 28, 2017. On June 15, 2017, the IPUC granted the request for reconsideration. On August 17, 2017, Intermountain, the IPUC staff and the interveners of the case filed a stipulation and settlement resolving all issues. The stipulation and settlement reflected an increase of approximately $1.2 million or 1.36 percent more in annual revenue than the amounts approved on April 28, 2017, as well as changes in billing determinants. The total annual increase in revenue of approximately $6.7 million was approved by the IPUC on September 14, 2017, with rates effective October 1, 2017.
On January 17, 2018, the IPUC issued a general order initiating the investigation of the impacts of the TCJA. The order required the tax rate reduction to be deferred as a regulatory liability and for companies to report on the expected impacts of the TCJA by March 30, 2018.MTPSC.

 
94MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 109



Part II

NDPSC
Montana-Dakota has a transmission cost adjustment rider that allows annual updates to rates for actual costs for transmission-related projects and services. On July 19, 2019, Montana-Dakota filed a change to its transmission cost adjustment rates to reflect projected charges for July 2019 through June 2020 assessed to Montana-Dakota for transmission-related services provided by MISO and Southwest Power Pool, along with the projected transmission service revenues or credits received for the same time period. Montana-Dakota also requested recovery of six transmission capital projects. Total revenues of approximately $9.2 million, which reflects a true-up of the prior period adjustment, were requested resulting in an increase of approximately $600,000 or approximately 7.2 percent over current rates, which includes approximately $1.5 million related to transmission capital projects. On October 22, 2019, the NDPSC approved the rates as requested. The rates were effective October 28, 2019.
Montana-Dakota has a renewable resource cost adjustment rate tariff that allows for annual adjustments for recent projected capital costs and related expenses for projects determined to be recoverable under the tariff. On November 1, 2019, Montana-Dakota filed an annual update to its renewable resource cost adjustment requesting to recover a revised revenue requirement of approximately $14.7 million annually, not including the prior period true-up adjustment. The update reflects a decrease of approximately $800,000 from the revenues currently included in rates. On February 19, 2020, the NDPSC approved the increase with rates effective on March 1, 2020.
On August 28, 2019, Montana-Dakota filed an application with the NDPSC for an advanced determination of prudence and a certificate of public convenience and necessity to construct, own and operate Heskett Unit 4, an 88-MW simple-cycle natural gas-fired combustion turbine peaking unit at the existing Heskett Station near Mandan, North Dakota. This matter is pending before the NDPSC.
On September 16, 2019, Montana-Dakota submitted an application with the NDPSC requesting the use of deferred accounting for the treatment of costs related to the retirement of Lewis & Clark Station in Sidney, Montana, and units 1 and 2 at Heskett Station near Mandan, North Dakota. This matter is pending before the NDPSC.
OPUC
On December 29, 2017, Cascade filed a request with the OPUC to use deferred accounting for the 2018 net benefits associated with the implementation of the TCJA. On September 12, 2019, the OPUC approved the request, including a settlement to refund to customers approximately $1.4 million related to TJCA impacts for the period from January 2018 through March 2019. These refunds will be reflected in customers' rates over a 12-month period beginning November 1, 2019.
On June 14, 2019, Cascade filed a request with the OPUC to implement a new pipeline safety cost recovery mechanism to recover investments to replace Cascade's highest risk infrastructure which would have required Cascade to file a report annually with the OPUC detailing actual projects undertaken and the related costs incurred. This matter was denied by the OPUC on January 15, 2020.
SDPUC
On November 8, 2019, Montana-Dakota submitted an application with the SDPUC requesting the use of deferred accounting for the treatment of costs related to the retirement of Lewis & Clark Station in Sidney, Montana, and units 1 and 2 at Heskett Station near Mandan, North Dakota. The SDPUC approved the use of deferred accounting treatment as requested on January 7, 2020.
WUTC
On March 29, 2019, Cascade filed a natural gas general rate case with the WUTC requesting an increase in annual revenue of $12.7 million or approximately 5.5 percent. On September 20, 2019, Cascade filed a joint settlement agreement with the WUTC reflecting a revised annual increase of approximately $6.5 million or approximately 2.8 percent with an effective date of March 1, 2020. A settlement hearing was held on November 5, 2019. On February 3, 2020, the WUTC approved the increase with rates effective on March 1, 2020.
Cascade has a pipeline replacement cost recovery mechanism, which is designed to recover the replacement cost of the Company's most at risk pipelines. The mechanism requires an annual filing on May 31, as well as two update filings for actual costs before the November 1 effective date. On May 31, 2019, Cascade filed its seventh annual update to its pipeline cost recovery mechanism requesting an increase in revenue of approximately $1.6 million or approximately 0.7 percent. On October 10, 2019, Cascade filed a final update to the cost recovery mechanism with a revised increase in revenue of approximately $440,000 or approximately 0.2 percent annually. On October 24, 2019, the WUTC approved the increase with rates effective for services provided on or after November 1, 2019.
Cascade defers the actual cost of gas spent to serve customers and annually records a true-up to their purchased gas adjustment tariff. On September 13, 2019, Cascade filed its annual update to its purchased gas adjustment with the WUTC requesting an annual increase of approximately $12.8 million or approximately 5.7 percent for a period of three years. The requested increase is primarily due to unrecovered purchased gas costs as a result of the rupture of the Enbridge pipeline in Canada on October 9, 2018, causing increased natural gas costs. On October 24, 2019, the WUTC approved the increase with rates effective for services provided on or after November 1, 2019.

110 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

MNPUCWYPSC
On December 21, 2016, Great Plains filed an application with the MNPUC requesting authority to implement a gas utility infrastructure cost tariff of approximately $456,000 annually. The tariff will allow Great Plains to recover infrastructure investments, not previously included in rates, mandated by federal or state agencies associated with Great Plains' pipeline integrity programs. On October 6, 2017, the MNPUC approved the implementation of the natural gas utility infrastructure cost tariff to collect an annual increase of approximately $456,000. Great Plains submitted a compliance filing on October 10, 2017, and the rates were implemented for service rendered on and after November 1, 2017.
On December 29, 2017, the MNPUC issued a notice of investigation related to tax changes with the enactment of the TCJA. On January 19, 2018, the MNPUC issued a notice of request for information, commission planning meeting and subsequent comment period. Great Plains was to provide preliminary impacts of the TCJA by January 30, 2018. A commission planning meeting was held on February 6, 2018, to discuss the impacts of the TCJA. Initial filings addressing the impacts of the TCJA are to be submitted by March 2, 2018.
MTPSC
On September 25, 2017,May 23, 2019, Montana-Dakota filed an application with the MTPSCWYPSC for a natural gas rate increase of approximately $2.8$1.1 million annually or approximately 4.17.0 percent above current rates. The requested increase is primarilywas to recover the increased investmentoperating expenses and investments in distribution facilities to enhanceimprove system safety and reliability and the depreciation and taxes associated with the increase in investment. Montana-Dakota is also introducing an SSIP and the proposed adjustment mechanism required to fund the SSIP. Montana-Dakota requested an interim increase of approximately $1.6 million or approximately 2.3 percent, subject to refund.reliability. On December 27, 2017, the MTPSC requested Montana-Dakota identify a plan for the impacts of the TCJA for the natural gas segment within the natural gas rate case. On January 12, 2018,17, 2019, Montana-Dakota filed a revised interimsettlement agreement with the WYPSC reflecting an annual increase in revenues of approximately $764,000, subject to refund, incorporating the estimated impacts of the TCJA reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate. A hearing is scheduled for April 26, 2018.$830,000 or approximately 5.5 percent with rates effective March 1, 2020. This matter is pending before the MTPSC.
On December 27, 2017, the MTPSC requested Montana-Dakota identify a plan for the impacts of the TCJA and to file a proposal for the impacts on the electric segment by March 31, 2018.
NDPSC
On June 30, 2017, Montana-Dakota filed an application for advance determination of prudence and a certificate of public convenience and necessity with the NDPSC to purchase an expansion of the Thunder Spirit Wind farm. The advance determination of prudence would provide Montana-Dakota with assurance that the project is prudent and in the best interest of the public and assists in the recovery of Montana-Dakota's investment upon completion of the project. The expansion is expected to serve customers by the end of 2018 and is estimated to cost approximately $85 million. On November 16, 2017, the NDPSC granted Montana-Dakota's request for an advance determination of prudence and certificate of public convenience and necessity to acquire and operate the Thunder Spirit Wind farm expansion.
On July 21, 2017, Montana-Dakota filed an application with the NDPSC for a natural gas rate increase of approximately $5.9 million annually or approximately 5.4 percent above current rates. The requested increase is primarily to recover the increased investment in distribution facilities to enhance system safety and reliability and the depreciation and taxes associated with the increase in investment. Montana-Dakota is also introducing an SSIP and the proposed adjustment mechanism required to fund the SSIP. Montana-Dakota requested an interim increase of approximately $4.6 million or approximately 4.2 percent, subject to refund. On September 6, 2017, the NDPSC approved the request for interim rates effective with service rendered on or after September 19, 2017. On January 12, 2018, Montana-Dakota requested a delay of the rate case as a result of the enactment of the TCJA to allow the Company time to investigate the implications of the TCJA on the rate case. On February 14, 2018, the NDPSC approved the delay of hearing and scheduled it to begin on May 30, 2018. Also on February 14, 2018, Montana-Dakota filed a revised interim increase request of approximately $2.7 million, subject to refund, incorporating the estimated impacts of the TCJA reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate.This matter is pending before the NDPSC.
On January 10, 2018, the NDPSC issued a general order initiating the investigation into the effects of the TCJA. The order required regulatory deferral accounting on the impacts of the TCJA and for companies to file comments and the expected impacts. On February 15, 2018, Montana-Dakota filed a summary of the primary impacts of the TCJA on the electric and natural gas utilities.
OPUC
On September 29, 2017, Cascade filed an application with the OPUC for an annual pipeline replacement safety cost recovery mechanism of approximately $784,000 or approximately 1.2 percent of additional revenue. The requested increase includes incremental pipeline replacement investments associated with qualifying pipeline integrity projects. This matter is pending before the OPUC.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 95



Part II

On December 29, 2017, Cascade filed a request with the OPUC to use deferral accounting for the 2018 net benefits associated with the implementation of the TCJA.
SDPUC
On December 29, 2017, the SDPUC issued an order initiating the investigation into the effects of the TCJA. The order required Montana-Dakota to provide comments by February 1, 2018, regarding the general effects of the TCJA on the cost of service in South Dakota and possible mechanisms for adjusting rates. The order also stated that all rates impacted by the federal income tax shall be adjusted effective January 1, 2018, subject to refund.
WUTC
On May 31, 2017, Cascade filed an application with the WUTC for an annual pipeline replacement cost recovery mechanism of approximately $1.6 million or approximately .75 percent of additional revenue. The requested increase includes incremental pipeline replacement investments associated with qualifying pipeline integrity projects. On October 12, 2017, Cascade filed a required update revising the request to approximately $1.3 million or approximately .61 percent of additional revenue and on October 26, 2017, the WUTC approved the order with rates effective November 1, 2017.
On August 31, 2017, Cascade filed an application with the WUTC for a natural gas rate increase of approximately $5.9 million annually or approximately 2.7 percent above current rates. The requested increase includes costs associated with increased infrastructure investment and the associated operating expenses. Also included in the request is recovery of operation and maintenance costs associated with a maximum allowable operating pressure validation plan. On January 3, 2018, the WUTC filed a bench request requiring Cascade to provide information related to the impacts of the TCJA on Cascade's revenue requirement and a proposed ratemaking treatment of those impacts. On January 12, 2018, Cascade filed a response to the bench request reducing the revenue requirement to approximately $1.7 million annually, which includes the estimated impacts of the TCJA. This matter is pending before the WUTC.
WYPSC
On December 29, 2017, the WYPSC issued a general order requiring regulatory deferral accounting on the impacts of the TCJA. A technical conference was held on February 6, 2018, to discuss the implications of the TCJA.WYPSC.
FERC
On September 1, 2017, Montana-Dakota submitted anDecember 9, 2019, MISO accepted Montana-Dakota's annual revenue requirement update to its transmission formula raterates under the MISO tariff which reflects an incremental increase of approximately $2.5 million to include a revenue requirement for the Company's multivalueits multi-value project for a total of $13.6approximately $13.1 million, which was effective January 1, 2018.
Montana-Dakota and certain MISO Transmission Owners with projected rates submitted a filing to2020. The update effective January 1, 2020, reflects the reduced return on equity order issued by the FERC on February 1, 2018, requesting the FERC to waive certain provisions of the MISO tariff in order for Montana-Dakota and certain MISO Transmission Owners with projected rates to revise their rates to reflect the reduction in the corporate tax rate. Under the MISO tariff, rates are to be changed only on an annual basis with any changes reflected in subsequent true-ups. If the waiver is granted, MISO expects to implement new rates reflecting the reduction in the tax rate beginning with services rendered on March 1, 2018, and will re-bill January and February 2018 services to reflect the new rates.
On February 7, 2018, WBI Energy Transmission announced it will hold an initial rate change pre-filing settlement meeting with customers on April 10, 2018. In accordance with WBI Energy Transmission’s offer of settlement and stipulation and agreement with the FERC dated June 4, 2014, the Company is to make a filing with new proposed rates to be effective no later than May 1,November 21, 2019. Assuming a five-month suspension period, WBI Energy Transmission would expect to file by October 31, 2018.
Note 1720 - Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is party to claims and lawsuits arising out of its business and that of its consolidated subsidiaries, which may include, but are not limited to, matters involving property damage, personal injury, and environmental, contractual, statutory and regulatory obligations. The Company accrues a liability for those contingencies when the incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum of the range is accrued. The Company does not accrue liabilities when the likelihood that the liability has been incurred is probable but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated or when the liability is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote. For contingencies where an unfavorable outcome is probable or reasonably possible and which are material, the Company discloses the nature of the contingency and, in some circumstances, an estimate of the possible loss. Accruals are based on the best information available, but in certain situations management is unable to estimate an amount or range of a reasonably possible loss including, but not limited to when: (1) the damages are unsubstantiated or indeterminate, (2) the proceedings are in the early stages, (3) numerous parties are involved, or (4)

96 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II

the matter involves novel or unsettled legal theories. The
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company accrued liabilities of $35.4 million and $31.8 million, which have not been discounted, including liabilities held for sale, of $29.1 million and $30.4 million, respectively. The accruals are for contingencies, including litigation, production taxes, royalty claims and environmental matters at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.matters. This includes amounts that may have been accrued for matters discussed in Litigation and Environmental matters within this note. The Company will continue to monitor each matter and adjust accruals as might be warranted based on new information and further developments. Management believes that the outcomes with respect to probable and reasonably possible losses in excess of the amounts accrued, net of insurance recoveries, while uncertain, either cannot be estimated or will not have a material effect upon the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Unless otherwise required by GAAP, legal costs are expensed as they are incurred.
Litigation
Construction Services Capital Electric provided employees in 2012 to perform work for a contractor on a project in Kansas. One of the Capital Electric employees was injured while working on the project and brought a lawsuit against the contractor. Judgment was entered in favor of the employee and his spouse on November 3, 2016, in the amount of $44.8 million following a court determination that the employee’s injuries were caused by the contractor’s negligence. The contractor claims that Capital Electric was contractually required, but failed, to name the contractor as an additional insured under any liability policy in effect at the time of the project and that such failure resulted in the entry of judgment against the contractor. In March 2017, Capital Electric filed a petition for declaratory judgment in the District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas for a judicial determination that any agreement between Capital Electric and the contractor for the project did not require Capital Electric to include the contractor as an additional insured under any liability policy issued to Capital Electric and that if such an agreement was found to exist, it would be void and unenforceable under Kansas law. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the matter has been settled with Capital Electric being released from all claims of liability and the declaratory judgment action being dismissed.
Environmental matters
Portland Harbor Site In December 2000, Knife River - Northwest was named by the EPA as a PRP in connection with the cleanup of athe riverbed site adjacent to a commercial property site acquired by Knife River - Northwest from Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. in 1999.along the Willamette River. The riverbed site is part of the Portland, Oregon, Harbor Superfund Site. TheSite where the EPA wants responsible parties to share in the cleanupcosts of sediment contamination in the Willamette River.cleanup. To date, costs of the overall remedial investigation and feasibility study of the harbor site are being recorded, and initially paid, through an administrative consent order by the LWG, a group of several entities, which does not include Knife River - Northwest or Georgia-Pacific West, Inc.LWG. Investigative costs are indicated to be in excess of $100 million. On January 6, 2017, Region 10 of the EPA issued an ROD with its selected remedy for cleanup of the in-river portion of the site. Implementation of the remedy$100 million. Remediation is expected to take up to 13 years with a present value cost estimate of approximately $1 billion. Corrective action will not be taken until remedial design/remedial action plans are approved by the EPA. Knife River - Northwest was also received notice in January 2008notified that the Portland Harbor Natural Resource Trustee Council intends to perform an injury assessment to natural resources resulting from the release of hazardous substances at the Harbor Superfund Site. The Portland Harbor Natural Resource Trustee Council indicates the injury determination is appropriate to facilitate early settlement of damages and restoration for natural resource injuries. It is not possible to estimate the costs of natural resource damages until an assessment is completed and allocations are undertaken.
Based upon a review of the Portland Harbor sediment contamination evaluation by the Oregon DEQ and other information available,At this time, Knife River - Northwest does not believe it is a responsible party. In addition, Knife River - Northwestparty and has notified Georgia-Pacific West, Inc., that it intends to seek indemnity for liabilities incurred in relation to the above matters pursuant to the terms of their sale agreement. Knife River - Northwest has entered into an agreement tolling the statute of limitations in connection with the LWG's potential claim for contribution to the costs of the remedial investigation and feasibility study. By letter in March 2009, LWG has stated its intent to file suit against Knife River - Northwest and others to recover LWG's investigation costs to the extent Knife River - Northwest cannot demonstrate its non-liability for the contamination or is unwilling to participate in an alternative dispute resolution process that has been established to address the matter. At this time, Knife River - Northwest has agreed to participate in the alternative dispute resolution process.
The Company believes it is not probable that it will incur any material environmental remediation costs or damages in relation to the above referenced matter.
Manufactured Gas Plant Sites There are three claims against Cascade for cleanup of environmental contamination at manufactured gas plant sites operated by Cascade's predecessors.
The first claim is for contamination at a site in Eugene, Oregon which was received in 1995. There are PRPs in addition to Cascade that may be liable for cleanup of the contamination. Some of these PRPs have shared in the investigation costs. It is expected that these and other PRPs will share in the cleanup costs. The Oregon DEQ released an ROD in January 2015 that selected a remediation alternative for the site as recommended in an earlier staff report. The total estimated cost for the selected remediation, including long-term maintenance, is approximately $3.5 million of which $400,000 has been incurred. It is not known at this time what share of the cleanup costs will

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 97111



Part II
 

actually be borneManufactured Gas Plant Sites Claims have been made against Cascade for cleanup of environmental contamination at manufactured gas plant sites operated by Cascade; however, CascadeCascade's predecessors and a similar claim has paid 50 percentbeen made against Montana-Dakota for a site operated by Montana-Dakota and its predecessors. Any accruals related to these claims are reflected in regulatory assets. For more information, see Note 7.
Demand has been made of the ongoingMontana-Dakota to participate in investigation and design costs and anticipates its proportional share of the final costs could be approximately 50 percent. Cascade has an accrual balance of $1.6 million for remediation of this site. In January 2013,environmental contamination at a site in Missoula, Montana. The site operated as a former manufactured gas plant from approximately 1907 to 1938 when it was converted to a butane-air plant that operated until 1956. Montana-Dakota or its predecessors owned or controlled the OPUC approved Cascade's application to defer environmental remediation costs at the Eugene site for a period of 12 months starting November 30, 2012. Cascadethe time it operated as a manufacturedgas plant and Montana-Dakota operated the butane-air plant from 1940 to 1951, at which time it sold the plant. There are no documented wastes or by-products resulting from the mixing or distribution of butane-air gas. Preliminary assessment of a portion of the site provided a recommended remedial alternative for that portion of approximately $560,000. However, the recommended remediation would not address any potential contamination to adjacent parcels that may be impacted by contamination from the manufactured gas plant. Montana-Dakota and another party agreed to voluntarily investigate and remediate the site and that Montana-Dakota will pay two-thirds of the costs for further investigation and remediation of the site. Montana-Dakota received orders reauthorizingnotice from a prior insurance carrier that it will participate in payment of defense costs incurred in relation to the deferred accountingclaim. Montana-Dakota has accrued $375,000 for the 12-month periods starting November 30, 2013, December 1, 2014, December 1, 2015, December 1, 2016 and December 1, 2017.remediation of this site.
The secondA claim iswas made against Cascade for contamination at the Bremerton Gasworks Superfund Site in Bremerton, Washington, which was received in 1997. A preliminary investigation has found soil and groundwater at the site contain contaminants requiring further investigation and cleanup. The EPA conducted a Targeted Brownfields Assessment of the site and released a report summarizing the results of that assessment in August 2009. The assessment confirms that contaminants have affected soil and groundwater at the site, as well as sediments in the adjacent Port Washington Narrows. Alternative remediation options have been identified with preliminary cost estimates ranging from $340,000 to $6.4 million. Data developed through the assessment and previous investigations indicates the contamination likely derived from multiple different sources and multiple current and former owners of properties and businesses in the vicinity of the site may be responsible for the contamination. In April 2010, the Washington DOE issued notice it considered Cascade a PRP for hazardous substances at the site. In May 2012, the EPA added the site to the National Priorities List of Superfund sites. Cascade has entered into an administrative settlement agreement and consent order with the EPA regarding the scope and schedule for a remedial investigation and feasibility study for the site. Current estimates for the cost to complete the remedial investigation and feasibility study are approximately $7.6 million of which $1.7$4.4 million has been incurred. Cascade has accrued $5.9$3.2 million for the remedial investigation and feasibility study, as well as $6.4 million for remediation of this site; however, the accrual for remediation costs will be reviewed and adjusted, if necessary, after completion of the remedial investigation and feasibility study. In April 2010, Cascade filed a petition with the WUTC for authority to defer the costs which are included in other noncurrent assets, incurred in relation to the environmental remediation of this site. The WUTC approved the petition in September 2010, subject to conditions set forth in the order.
The thirdA claim iswas made against Cascade for contamination at a site in Bellingham, Washington. Cascade received notice from a party in May 2008 that Cascade may be a PRP, along with other parties, for contamination from a manufactured gas plant owned by Cascade and its predecessor from about 1946 to 1962. The notice indicates that current estimates to complete investigation and cleanup of the site exceed $8.0 million. Other PRPs have reached an agreed order and work plan with the Washington DOE for completion of a remedial investigation and feasibility study for the site. A report documenting the initial phasefeasibility study prepared for one of the remedial investigation was completedPRPs in June 2011. There is currently not enough information availableMarch 2018 identifies five cleanup action alternatives for the site with estimated costs ranging from $8.0 million to estimate$20.4 million with a selected preferred alternative having an estimated total cost of $9.3 million. The other PRPs will develop a cleanup action plan and, after public review of the potential liability to Cascade associated with this claim althoughcleanup action plan, develop design documents. Cascade believes its proportional share of any liability will be relatively small in comparison to other PRPs. The plant manufactured gas from coal between approximately 1890 and 1946. In 1946, shortly after Cascade's predecessor acquired the plant, it converted the plant converted to a propane-air gas facility. There are no documented wastes or by-products resulting from the mixing or distribution of propane-air gas. Cascade has not recorded an accrual for this site.site for an amount that is not material.
Cascade has received notices from and entered into agreement with certain of its insurance carriers that they will participate in defense of Cascade for thesecertain of the contamination claims subject to full and complete reservations of rights and defenses to insurance coverage. To the extent these claims are not covered by insurance, Cascade intends to seek recovery of remediation costs through the OPUC and WUTC of remediation costs in its natural gas rates charged to customers. The accruals related to these matters are reflected in regulatory assets. For more information, see Note 4.
Operating leases
The Company leases certain equipment, facilities and land under operating lease agreements. The amounts of annual minimum lease payments due under these leases as of December 31, 2017, were:
 2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
 (In thousands)
Operating leases$55,511
$45,307
$33,168
$18,562
$7,047
$40,833

Rent expense was $73.7 million, $65.0 million and $53.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 
98112 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Purchase commitments
The Company has entered into various commitments largely construction,consisting of contracts for natural gas and coal supply,supply; purchased power,power; natural gas transportation and storage, and service, shippingstorage; employee service; information technology; and construction materials supplymaterials. Certain of these contracts some of which are subject to variability in volume and price. The commitment terms vary in length, up to 4341 years. The commitments under these contracts as of December 31, 20172019, were:
 2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
 (In thousands)
Purchase commitments$360,751
$215,005
$162,424
$135,334
$99,068
$773,820
 2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
 (In thousands)
Purchase commitments$405,535
$250,266
$184,225
$123,166
$87,297
$678,432

These commitments were not reflected in the Company's consolidated financial statements. Amounts purchased under various commitments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, were $516.1$686.5 million, $539.3$548.0 million and $842.1$516.1 million, respectively.
Guarantees
In June 2016, WBI Energy sold all of the outstanding membership interests in Dakota Prairie Refining. In connection with the sale, Centennial agreed to continue to guarantee certain debt obligations of Dakota Prairie Refining which totaled $56.3 million at December 31, 2017, and arewere expected to mature in 2023. Tesoro agreed to indemnify Centennial for any losses and litigation expenses arising from the guarantee. The estimated fair values of the indemnity asset and guarantee liability are reflected in deferred charges and other assets - other and deferred credits and other liabilities - other, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Continuation of the guarantee was required as a condition to the sale of Dakota Prairie Refining.
In March 2016, a sale agreement On October 17, 2018, Centennial was signed to sell Fidelity's assets in the Paradox Basin. In connection with the sale, Centennial agreed toreleased from this guarantee Fidelity's indemnityof certain debt obligations associated with the Paradox Basin assets. The guarantee was required by the buyer as a condition to the sale of the Paradox Basin assets.Dakota Prairie Refining.
In 2009, multiple sale agreements were signed to sell the Company's ownership interests in the Brazilian Transmission Lines. In connection with the sale, Centennial has agreed to guarantee payment of any indemnity obligations of certain of the Company's indirect wholly owned subsidiaries who are the sellerssubsidiaries. The remaining guarantee is expected to expire in three purchase and sale agreements for periods ranging up to 10 years from the date of sale.2021. The guarantees were required by the buyers as a condition to the sale of the Brazilian Transmission Lines.
Certain subsidiaries of the Company have outstanding guarantees to third parties that guarantee the performance of other subsidiaries of the Company. These guarantees are related to construction contracts, insurance deductibles and loss limits, and certain other guarantees. At December 31, 20172019, the fixed maximum amounts guaranteed under these agreements aggregated $108.0 million.$174.8 million. Certain of the guarantees also have no fixed maximum amounts specified. The amounts of scheduled expiration of the maximum amounts guaranteed under these agreements aggregate $6.4 million in 2018; $25.9to $162.6 million in 2019; $68.7 million2020; $700,000 in 2020;2021; $400,000 in 2022; $500,000 in 2021;2023; $500,000 in 2022; $2.02024; $1.1 million thereafter; and $4.0$9.0 million, which has no scheduled maturity date. There were no0 amounts outstanding under the above guarantees at December 31, 20172019. In the event of default under these guarantee obligations, the subsidiary issuing the guarantee for that particular obligation would be required to make payments under its guarantee.
Certain subsidiaries have outstanding letters of credit to third parties related to insurance policies and other agreements, some of which are guaranteed by other subsidiaries of the Company. At December 31, 20172019, the fixed maximum amounts guaranteed under these letters of credit aggregated $34.033.2 million, all. The amounts of which expirescheduled expiration of the maximum amounts guaranteed under these letters of credit aggregate to $32.7 million in 2018.2020 and $500,000 in 2021. There were no0 amounts outstanding under the above letters of credit at December 31, 20172019. In the event of default under these letter of credit obligations, the subsidiary issuingguaranteeing the letter of credit for that particular obligation would be required to makeobligated for reimbursement of payments made under itsthe letter of credit.
In addition, Centennial, Knife River and MDU Construction Services have issued guarantees to third parties related to the routine purchase of maintenance items, materials and lease obligations for which no fixed maximum amounts have been specified. These guarantees have no scheduled maturity date. In the event a subsidiary of the Company defaults under these obligations, Centennial, Knife River andor MDU Construction Services would be required to make payments under these guarantees. Any amounts outstanding by subsidiaries of the Company for these guarantees were reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 20172019.
In the normal course of business, Centennial has surety bonds related to construction contracts and reclamation obligations of its subsidiaries. In the event a subsidiary of Centennial does not fulfill a bonded obligation, Centennial would be responsible to the surety bond company for completion of the bonded contract or obligation. A large portion of the surety bonds is expected to expire within the next 12 months; however, Centennial will likely continue to enter into surety bonds for its subsidiaries in the future. As ofAt December 31, 20172019, approximately $616.5 million1.1 billion of surety bonds were outstanding, which were not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 99



Part II

Variable interest entities
The Company evaluates its arrangements and contracts with other entities to determine if they are VIEs and if so, if the Company is the primary beneficiary. For more information, see Note 1.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 113



Part II

Fuel Contract Coyote Station entered into a coal supply agreement with Coyote Creek that provides for the purchase of coal necessary to supply the coal requirements of the Coyote Station for the period May 2016 through December 2040. Coal purchased under the coal supply agreement is reflected in inventories on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and is recovered from customers as a component of electric fuel and purchased power.
The coal supply agreement creates a variable interest in Coyote Creek due to the transfer of all operating and economic risk to the Coyote Station owners, as the agreement is structured so that the price of the coal will cover all costs of operations, as well as future reclamation costs. The Coyote Station owners are also providing a guarantee of the value of the assets of Coyote Creek as they would be required to buy the assets at book value should they terminate the contract prior to the end of the contract term and are providing a guarantee of the value of the equity of Coyote Creek in that they are required to buy the entity at the end of the contract term at equity value. Although the Company has determined that Coyote Creek is a VIE, the Company has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of Coyote Creek because the authority to direct the activities of the entity is shared by the four unrelated owners of the Coyote Station, with no primary beneficiary existing. As a result, Coyote Creek is not required to be consolidated in the Company's financial statements.
At December 31, 2017,2019, the Company's exposure to loss as a result of the Company's involvement with the VIE, based on the Company's ownership percentage was $40.8$36.0 million.
Note 21 - Subsequent Events
On February 3, 2020, the Company acquired PerLectric, Inc., a leading electrical construction company in Fairfax, Virginia, which will be included in the Company's construction services segment. On February 14, 2020, the Company acquired the assets of Oldcastle Infrastructure Spokane, a prestressed-concrete business located in Spokane, Washington, which will be included in the Company's construction materials and contracting segment. To date, the initial accounting for these acquisitions is incomplete. Due to the limited time since the date of these acquisitions, it is impracticable for the Company to make business combination disclosures related to these acquisitions. The Company is still gathering the necessary information to provide such disclosures in future filings.

 
100114 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part II
 

Supplementary Financial Information
Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
The following unaudited information shows selected items by quarter for the years 20172019 and 2016:2018:
 
First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
2017    
Operating revenues$937,925
$1,067,639
$1,272,548
$1,165,239
Operating expenses870,813
987,960
1,116,171
1,039,695
Operating income67,112
79,679
156,377
125,544
Income from continuing operations35,638
44,405
89,549
115,394
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax1,687
(3,190)(2,198)(82)
Net income attributable to the Company37,325
41,215
87,351
115,312
Earnings per common share - basic: 
 
 
 
Earnings before discontinued operations.18
.22
.46
.59
Discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax.01
(.01)(.01)
Earnings per common share - basic.19
.21
.45
.59
Earnings per common share - diluted: 
 
 
 
Earnings before discontinued operations.18
.22
.46
.59
Discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax.01
(.01)(.01)
Earnings per common share - diluted.19
.21
.45
.59
Weighted average common shares outstanding: 
 
 
 
Basic195,304
195,304
195,304
195,304
Diluted196,023
195,973
195,783
195,617
     
2016 
 
 
 
Operating revenues$860,214
$1,043,948
$1,208,567
$1,016,099
Operating expenses798,229
954,983
1,061,883
904,613
Operating income61,985
88,965
146,684
111,486
Income from continuing operations31,865
46,298
88,386
66,547
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax(6,996)(155,451)(5,400)(816)
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company24,869
(109,153)82,986
65,731
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic: 
 
 
 
Earnings before discontinued operations.16
.24
.45
.34
Discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax(.03)(.80)(.03)
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic.13
(.56).42
.34
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted: 
 
 
 
Earnings before discontinued operations.16
.24
.45
.33
Discontinued operations attributable to the Company, net of tax(.03)(.80)(.03)
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted.13
(.56).42
.33
Weighted average common shares outstanding: 
 
 
 
Basic195,284
195,304
195,304
195,304
Diluted195,284
195,699
195,811
195,889
 
First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
2019    
Operating revenues$1,091,191
$1,303,573
$1,563,799
$1,378,213
Operating expenses1,026,973
1,206,262
1,374,329
1,247,992
Operating income64,218
97,311
189,470
130,221
Income from continuing operations41,089
63,145
136,128
94,804
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(163)(1,320)1,509
261
Net income40,926
61,825
137,637
95,065
Earnings per share - basic: 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations.21
.32
.68
.47
Discontinued operations, net of tax
(.01).01

Earnings per share - basic.21
.31
.69
.47
Earnings per share - diluted: 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations.21
.32
.68
.47
Discontinued operations, net of tax
(.01).01

Earnings per share - diluted.21
.31
.69
.47
Weighted average common shares outstanding: 
 
 
 
Basic196,401
198,270
199,343
200,383
Diluted196,414
198,287
199,383
200,478
     
2018 
 
 
 
Operating revenues$976,293
$1,064,597
$1,280,787
$1,209,875
Operating expenses906,917
990,605
1,140,783
1,091,524
Operating income69,376
73,992
140,004
118,351
Income from continuing operations41,960
44,075
107,369
75,982
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax477
(273)(118)2,846
Net income42,437
43,802
107,251
78,828
Earnings per share - basic: 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations.22
.22
.55
.39
Discontinued operations, net of tax


.01
Earnings per share - basic.22
.22
.55
.40
Earnings per share - diluted: 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations.22
.22
.55
.39
Discontinued operations, net of tax


.01
Earnings per share - diluted.22
.22
.55
.40
Weighted average common shares outstanding: 
 
 
 
Basic195,304
195,524
196,018
196,023
Diluted195,982
196,169
196,265
196,385

Notes:
Fourth quarter 2016 reflects a reduction to a previously recorded MEPP withdrawal liability of $11.1 million (before tax). For more information, see Note 14.
First quarter 2016 has been recast to present the results ofCertain operations of Dakota Prairie Refining as discontinued operations, other than certain general and administrative costs and interest expense which were previously allocated to the former refining segment and do not meet the criteria for income (loss) from discontinued operations.
Fourth quarter 2017 reflects an income tax benefit of $39.5 million related to the TCJA. For more information, see Note 11.
Certain Company operations are highly seasonal and revenues from and certain expenses for such operations may fluctuate significantly among quarterly periods. Accordingly, quarterly financial information may not be indicative of results for a full year.
Exploration and Production Activities (Unaudited)
In the second quarter of 2015, the Company began the marketing and sale process of Fidelity with an anticipated sale to occur within one year. Between September 2015 and March 2016, the Company entered into purchase and sale agreements to sell substantially all of

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 101



Part II

Fidelity's oil and natural gas assets. The completion of these sales occurred between October 2015 and April 2016. Prior to the asset sales, Fidelity was significantly involved in the development and production of oil and natural gas resources. Upon the completion of the asset sales, the Company had no remaining proved oil, NGL or natural gas reserves. At the time the Company committed to a plan to sell Fidelity, the Company stopped the use of the full-cost method of accounting for its oil and natural gas production activities. The assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale and the results of operations included in income (loss) from discontinued operations, other than certain general and administrative costs and interest expense which do not meet the criteria for income (loss) from discontinued operations. For more information, see Note 2.


102 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K115



Part II
 

Definitions
The following abbreviations and acronyms used in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are defined below:
Abbreviation or Acronym 
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
Andeavor Field Services LLCFormerly QEP Field Services, LLC doing business as Tesoro Logistics Rockies LLC
ASCFASB Accounting Standards Codification
ATBsASUAtmospheric tower bottomsFASB Accounting Standards Update
Big Stone Station475-MW coal-fired electric generating facility near Big Stone City, South Dakota (22.7 percent ownership)
Brazilian Transmission LinesCompany's former investment in companies owning three electric transmission lines in Brazil
CalumetBSSECalumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
Capital ElectricCapital Electric Construction Company, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Construction Services345-kilovolt transmission line from Ellendale, North Dakota, to Big Stone City, South Dakota (50 percent ownership)
CascadeCascade Natural Gas Corporation, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Energy Capital
CentennialCentennial Energy Holdings, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
Centennial CapitalCentennial Holdings Capital LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
Centennial's Consolidated EBITDACentennial's consolidated net income from continuing operations plus the related interest expense, taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization of intangibles and any non-cash charge relating to asset impairment for the preceding 12-month period
Centennial ResourcesCentennial Energy Resources LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
CompanyMDU Resources Group, Inc. (formerly known as MDUR Newco), which, as the context requires, refers to the previous MDU Resources Group, Inc. prior to January 1, 2019, and the new holding company of the same name after January 1, 2019
Coyote CreekCoyote Creek Mining Company, LLC, a subsidiary of The North American Coal Corporation
Coyote Station427-MW coal-fired electric generating facility near Beulah, North Dakota (25 percent ownership)
Dakota Prairie Refinery20,000-barrel-per-day diesel topping plant built by Dakota Prairie Refining in southwestern North Dakota
Dakota Prairie RefiningDakota Prairie Refining, LLC, a limited liability company previously owned by WBI Energy and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (previously included in the Company's refining segment)
EBITDAEarnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization
EINEmployer Identification Number
EPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FidelityFidelity Exploration & Production Company, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings (previously referred to as the Company's exploration and production segment)
FIPFunding improvement plan
GAAPAccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
Great PlainsGreat Plains Natural Gas Co., a public utility division of the Company prior to the closing of the Holding Company Reorganization and a public utility division of Montana-Dakota as of January 1, 2019
Holding Company ReorganizationThe internal holding company reorganization completed on January 1, 2019, pursuant to the agreement and plan of merger, dated as of December 31, 2018, by and among Montana-Dakota, the Company and MDUR Newco Sub, which resulted in the Company becoming a holding company and owning all of the outstanding capital stock of Montana-Dakota.
IBEWInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
IFRSInternational Financial Reporting Standards
IntermountainIntermountain Gas Company, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Energy Capital
IPUCIdaho Public Utilities Commission
Knife RiverKnife River Corporation, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
Knife River - NorthwestKnife River Corporation - Northwest, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Knife River
K-PlanCompany's 401(k) Retirement Plan
LWGLower Willamette Group
MDU Construction ServicesMDU Construction Services Group, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
MDU Energy CapitalMDU Energy Capital, LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
MDUR NewcoMDUR Newco, Inc., a public holding company created by implementing the Holding Company Reorganization, now known as the Company
MDUR Newco SubMDUR Newco Sub, Inc., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of MDUR Newco, which was merged with and into Montana–Dakota in the Holding Company Reorganization
MEPPMultiemployer pension plan
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MNPUCMinnesota Public Utilities Commission
Montana-DakotaMontana-Dakota Utilities Co., a public utility division of the Company
MTPSCMontana Public Service Commission
MWMegawatt

 
116 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K103



Part II
 

MNPUCMinnesota Public Utilities Commission
Montana-DakotaMontana-Dakota Utilities Co. (formerly known as MDU Resources Group, Inc.), a public utility division of the Company prior to the closing of the Holding Company Reorganization and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Energy Capital as of January 1, 2019
MTPSCMontana Public Service Commission
MWMegawatt
NDPSCNorth Dakota Public Service Commission
NGLNatural gas liquids
OilIncludes crude oil and condensate
OPUCOregon Public Utility Commission
Oregon DEQOregon State Department of Environmental Quality
PronghornNatural gas processing plant located near Belfield, North Dakota (WBI Energy Midstream's 50 percent ownership interests were sold effective January 1, 2017)
PRPPotentially Responsible Party
RODRecord of Decision
RPRehabilitation plan
SDPUCSouth Dakota Public Utilities Commission
SECUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC Defined PricesThe average price of oil and natural gas during the applicable 12-month period, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions
SSIPSystem Safety and Integrity Program
Stock Purchase PlanCompany's Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan which was terminated effective December 5, 2016
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act
TesoroTesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC
VIEVariable interest entity
Washington DOEWashington State Department of Ecology
WBI EnergyWBI Energy, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings
WBI Energy MidstreamWBI Energy Midstream, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings
WBI Energy TransmissionWBI Energy Transmission, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings
WBI HoldingsWBI Holdings, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial
WUTCWashington Utilities and Transportation Commission
Wygen III100-MW coal-fired electric generating facility near Gillette, Wyoming (25 percent ownership)
WYPSCWyoming Public Service Commission

 
104 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K117



Part II
 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
The following information includes the evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures by the Company's chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, along with any significant changes in internal controls of the Company.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The term "disclosure controls and procedures" is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. The Company's disclosure controls and other procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. The Company's disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, such controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Controls
No change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarterthree months ended December 31, 20172019, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The information required by this item is included in this Form 10-K at Item 8 - Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The information required by this item is included in this Form 10-K at Item 8 - Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.


 
118 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K105



Part III
 


Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information required by this item iswill be included in the Company's Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information required by this item iswill be included in the Company's Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table includes information as of December 31, 2017,2019, with respect to the Company's equity compensation plans:
Plan Category
(a)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

 
(b)
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

 
(c)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

 
(a)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

 
(b)
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

 
(c)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (1)692,761
(2)$
(3)4,662,030
(4)(5)596,341
(2)$
(3)4,012,055
(4)(5)
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholdersN/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 
Total692,761
 $
 4,662,030
 596,341
 $
 4,012,055
 
(1)Consists of the Non-Employee Director Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan.
(2)Consists of performance shares.shares and restricted stock awards.
(3)No weighted average exercise price is shown for the performance shares.shares or restricted stock awards because such awards have no exercise price.
(4)This amount includes 4,307,5743,737,848 shares available for future issuance under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan in connection with grants of restricted stock, performance units, performance shares or other equity-based awards.
(5)This amount includes 354,456274,207 shares available for future issuance under the Non-Employee Director Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. Under this plan, in addition to a cash retainer, non-employee directors, excluding the Chair of the Board, are awarded shares equal in value to $110,000 annually and the Chair of the Board is awarded shares equal in value to $145,000 annually. A non-employee director may acquire additional shares under the plan in lieu of receiving the cash portion of the director's retainer or fees.
 
The remaining information required by this item iswill be included in the Company's Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information required by this item iswill be included in the Company's Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information required by this item iswill be included in the Company's Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 
106 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K119



Part IV
 


Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits
Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
1. Financial Statements 
The following consolidated financial statements required under this item are
included under Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Page
  
  
  
  
  
  
2. Financial Statement Schedules 
The following financial statement schedules are included in Part IV of this report.Page
  
 
  
  
  
  
  


 
120 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K107



Part IV
 

MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Unconsolidated)
Condensed Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Operating revenues$623,693
$561,266
$556,112
$
$628,331
$623,693
Operating expenses516,524
469,062
478,198

540,125
520,069
Operating income107,169
92,204
77,914

88,206
103,624
Other income1,331
1,491
8,318

1,504
4,876
Interest expense31,997
31,519
23,562

32,761
31,997
Income before income taxes76,503
62,176
62,670

56,949
76,503
Income taxes13,800
6,355
15,882

(4,259)13,800
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries from continuing operations222,283
177,275
129,601
335,166
208,177
222,283
Net income from continuing operations284,986
233,096
176,389
335,166
269,385
284,986
Equity in loss of subsidiaries from discontinued operations attributable to the Company(3,783)(168,663)(798,824)
Loss on redemption of preferred stocks600


Dividends declared on preferred stocks171
685
685
Earnings (loss) on common stock$280,432
$63,748
$(623,120)
Comprehensive income (loss)$279,602
$65,848
$(617,480)
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries from discontinued operations287
2,933
(3,783)
Loss on redemption of preferred stock

600
Dividends declared on preferred stock

171
Earnings on common stock$335,453
$272,318
$280,432
Comprehensive income$331,693
$279,269
$279,602
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

 
108MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 121



Part IV

MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Unconsolidated)
Condensed Balance Sheets
December 31,2019
2018
(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts) 
Assets  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$12,326
$2,271
Receivables, net4,727
92,724
Accounts receivable from subsidiaries49,943
36,015
Inventories
13,293
Prepayments and other current assets501
14,488
Total current assets67,497
158,791
Investments46,294
76,202
Investment in subsidiaries2,842,068
1,790,886
Property, plant and equipment
2,846,715
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
836,735
Net property, plant and equipment
2,009,980
Deferred charges and other assets:  
Goodwill
4,812
Operating lease right-of-use assets153

Other34,367
180,473
Total deferred charges and other assets34,520
185,285
Total assets$2,990,379
$4,221,144
   
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity  
Current liabilities:  
Long-term debt due within one year$
$200,711
Accounts payable2,981
50,051
Accounts payable to subsidiaries4,752
12,438
Taxes payable1,253
24,704
Dividends payable41,580
39,695
Accrued compensation8,812
14,346
Current operating lease liabilities96

Other accrued liabilities7,690
54,099
Total current liabilities67,164
396,044
Long-term debt
586,012
Deferred credits and other liabilities:  
Deferred income taxes
165,122
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities56

Other75,913
507,191
Total deferred credits and other liabilities75,969
672,313
Commitments and contingencies




Stockholders' equity: 
 
Common stock 
 
Authorized - 500,000,000 shares, $1.00 par value  
Shares issued - 200,922,790 at December 31, 2019 and 196,564,907 at December 31, 2018200,923
196,565
Other paid-in capital1,355,404
1,248,576
Retained earnings1,336,647
1,163,602
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(42,102)(38,342)
Treasury stock at cost - 538,921 shares(3,626)(3,626)
Total stockholders' equity2,847,246
2,566,775
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$2,990,379
$4,221,144
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

122 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part IV
 

MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Unconsolidated)
Condensed Balance Sheets
December 31,2017
2016
(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts) 
Assets  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$843
$4,159
Receivables, net83,453
80,467
Accounts receivable from subsidiaries34,029
34,424
Inventories13,864
17,352
Prepayments and other current assets34,400
24,531
Total current assets166,589
160,933
Investments76,779
70,370
Investment in subsidiaries1,704,908
1,603,874
Property, plant and equipment2,631,161
2,502,264
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization797,130
756,191
Net property, plant and equipment1,834,031
1,746,073
Deferred charges and other assets:  
Goodwill4,812
4,812
Other175,599
183,654
Total deferred charges and other assets180,411
188,466
Total assets$3,962,718
$3,769,716
   
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity  
Current liabilities:  
Long-term debt due within one year$100,011
$110
Accounts payable47,000
37,697
Accounts payable to subsidiaries7,234
5,592
Taxes payable13,717
14,992
Dividends payable38,573
37,767
Accrued compensation20,017
16,086
Other accrued liabilities36,881
34,929
Total current liabilities263,433
147,173
Long-term debt612,493
679,667
Deferred credits and other liabilities:  
Deferred income taxes147,847
270,126
Other509,902
356,506
Total deferred credits and other liabilities657,749
626,632
Commitments and contingencies




Stockholders' equity: 
 
Preferred stocks
15,000
Common stockholders' equity: 
 
Common stock 
 
Authorized - 500,000,000 shares, $1.00 par value  
Issued - 195,843,297 shares in 2017 and 2016195,843
195,843
Other paid-in capital1,233,412
1,232,478
Retained earnings1,040,748
912,282
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(37,334)(35,733)
Treasury stock at cost - 538,921 shares(3,626)(3,626)
Total common stockholders' equity2,429,043
2,301,244
Total stockholders' equity2,429,043
2,316,244
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$3,962,718
$3,769,716
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 109



Part IV

MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Unconsolidated)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31,2017
2016
2015
2019
2018
2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities$284,075
$238,125
$255,273
$168,520
$294,379
$284,075
Investing activities:  
 
  
 
Capital expenditures(146,370)(159,570)(349,985)
(242,692)(146,370)
Net proceeds from sale or disposition of property and other(5,665)3,784
3,268

5,032
(5,665)
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries(40,000)(5,000)(7,000)(120,000)(40,000)(40,000)
Advances from subsidiaries40,000
15,000
100,000
17,000
70,000
40,000
Investments(468)(129)5
(236)(528)(468)
Net cash used in investing activities(152,503)(145,915)(253,712)(103,236)(208,188)(152,503)
Financing activities:  
 
  
 
Issuance of long-term debt70,080
106,420
224,185

199,422
70,080
Repayment of long-term debt(37,569)(50,010)(108,008)
(125,961)(37,569)
Payments of stock issuance costs
(10)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock

21,898
106,848


Dividends paid(150,727)(147,156)(142,835)(160,256)(154,573)(150,727)
Redemption of preferred stock(15,600)



(15,600)
Repurchase of common stock(564)


(1,920)(564)
Tax withholding on stock-based compensation(508)(226)
(1,821)(1,721)(508)
Net cash used in financing activities(134,888)(90,972)(4,760)(55,229)(84,763)(134,888)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(3,316)1,238
(3,199)10,055
1,428
(3,316)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year4,159
2,921
6,120
2,271
843
4,159
Cash and cash equivalents - end of year$843
$4,159
$2,921
$12,326
$2,271
$843
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation The condensed financial information reported in Schedule I is being presented to comply with Rule 12-04 of Regulation S-X. The information is unconsolidated and is presented for the parent company only, which is comprised of MDU Resources Group, Inc. (the Company) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Prior to the Holding Company Reorganization, the Company included Montana-Dakota and Great Plains, public utility divisions of the Company as of December 31, 2018. On January 2, 2019, the Company announced the completion of the Holding Company Reorganization, which resulted in Montana-Dakota and Great Plains becoming a subsidiary of the Company. Immediately after consummation, the Company had, on a consolidated basis, the same assets, businesses and operations as it had immediately prior to the reorganization. For more information on the reorganization, see Item 8 - Note 1. The prior periods have not been restated and reflect the condensed financial information of Montana-Dakota and Great Plains as of and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Due to the completion of the Holding Company Reorganization, the presentation of prior periods will vary from that of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. In Schedule I, investments in subsidiaries are presented under the equity method of accounting where the assets and liabilities of the subsidiaries are not consolidated. The investments in net assets of the subsidiaries are recorded on the Condensed Balance Sheets. The income from subsidiaries is reported as equity in earnings of subsidiaries on the Condensed Statements of Income. The material cash inflows on the Condensed Statements of Cash Flows are primarily from the dividends and other payments received from its subsidiaries and the proceeds raised from the issuance of equity securities. The consolidated financial statements of MDU Resources Group, Inc. reflect certain businesses as discontinued operations. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Earnings (loss) per common share Please refer to the Consolidated Statements of Income of the registrant for earnings (loss) per common share. In addition, see Item 8 - Note 1 for information on the computation of earnings (loss) per common share.
Note 2 - Debt At December 31, 20172019, the Company had no long-term debt maturities, excluding unamortized debt issuance costs, of $100.0 million in 2018, $74.5 million in 2019, $700,000 in 2020, $700,000 in 2021, $700,000 in 2022 and $538.1 million scheduled to mature in years after 2022.
maturities. For more information on debt, see Item 8 - Note 6.9.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 123



Part IV

Note 3 - Dividends The Company depends on earnings from its divisions and dividends from its subsidiaries to pay dividends on common stock. Cash dividends paid to the Company by subsidiaries were $116.1177.1 million, $115.8115.9 million and $110.6116.1 million for the years ended December 31, 20172019, 20162018 and 20152017, respectively.

110 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part IV

MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
Schedule II - Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017
 Additions    Additions   
DescriptionBalance at Beginning of Year
Charged to Costs and Expenses
Other
*Deductions
**Balance at End of Year
Balance at Beginning of Year
Charged to Costs and Expenses
Other
*Deductions
**Balance at End of Year
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts:Allowance for doubtful accounts:     Allowance for doubtful accounts:     
2019$8,850
$7,864
$980
 $9,197
 $8,497
20188,069
7,532
1,121
 7,872
 8,850
2017$10,479
$7,024
$989
 $10,423
 $8,069
10,479
7,024
989
 10,423
 8,069
20169,835
8,302
851
 8,509
 10,479
20159,511
11,343
1,012
 12,031
 9,835

*Recoveries.
**Uncollectible accounts written off.
 

All other schedules are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required, or because the information required is included in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
3. Exhibits
   Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit NumberExhibit DescriptionFiled HerewithFormPeriod EndedExhibitFiling DateFile Number
2(a)8-K/A2.17/21/161-03480
2(b) 8-K/A8-K 2.22(a)7/21/161-03480
2(c)8-K/A2.37/21/161/2/191-03480
3(a) 10-Q8-K9/30/103(a)3.211/3/105/8/191-03480
3(b) 8-K 3.12/21/1715/191-03480
4(a) S-8 4(f)1/21/04333-112035
4(b) 10-K12/31/094(c)2/17/101-03480
*4(c)10-Q6/30/054(a)8/3/051-03480
4(d)10-Q6/30/064(a)8/4/061-03480

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 111



Part IV

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit NumberExhibit DescriptionFiled HerewithFormPeriod EndedExhibitFiling DateFile Number
4(e)10-K12/31/154(e)2/19/161-03480
4(f)10-K12/31/154(f)2/19/161-03480
4(g)10-K12/31/114(e)2/24/121-03480
4(h)10-Q9/30/12411/7/121-03480
4(i)10-Q6/30/144(a)8/8/141-03480
4(j)X10-Q6/30/144(b)8/8/141-03480
4(k)*4(d)X
4(e)10-Q6/30/194(a)8/2/191-03480
4(f) 10-Q9/30/161944(a)11/7/161-03480
4(l)8-K48/16/071-03480
4(m)10-Q9/30/084(b)11/5/081-03480
4(n)Indenture dated as of August 1, 1992, between Cascade Natural Gas Corporation and The Bank of New York relating to Medium-Term Notes, filed by Cascade Natural Gas Corporation8-K48/12/921-07196
4(o)First Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 25, 1993, between Cascade Natural Gas Corporation and The Bank of New York relating to Medium-Term Notes and the 7.5% Notes due November 15, 2031, filed by Cascade Natural Gas Corporation10-Q6/30/9341-07196
4(p)8-K4.11/26/051-07196
4(q)8-K4.13/8/071-07196
+10(a)10-Q6/30/1710(d)8/4/171-03480
+10(b)10-Q6/30/1710(a)8/4/17191-03480

 
112124 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part IV
 

   Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit NumberExhibit DescriptionFiled HerewithFormPeriod EndedExhibitFiling DateFile Number
4(g)X
+10(a)10-Q6/30/1710(d)8/4/171-03480
+10(b)10-Q6/30/1910(a)8/2/191-03480
+10(c) 10-Q6/30/0810(a)8/7/081-03480
+10(d) 10-Q6/30/1110(a)8/5/111-03480
+10(e) 10-Q6/30/1210(a)8/7/121-03480
+10(f) 10-K12/31/1510(f)2/19/161-03480
+10(g)X10-Q6/30/1710(b)8/4/171-03480
+10(h)8-K10.32/18/151-03480
+10(i)8-K10.32/18/161-03480
+10(j) 8-K 10.12/21/171-03480
+10(i)8-K10.12/21/181-03480
+10(j)10-K12/31/1810(k)2/22/191-03480
+10(k)X
+10(l) 8-K 10.210.32/18/1621/181-03480
+10(l)10(m) 8-K 10.15/15/141-03480
+10(m)10(n) 8-K 10.25/15/141-03480
+10(n)10-Q9/30/1710(b)11/3/171-03480
+10(o) 10-Q6/30/1710(c)8/4/171-03480
+10(p) 10-Q3/31/1710(a)5/8/171-03480
+10(q) 10-Q3/31/1710(b)5/8/171-03480
+10(r) 10-Q6/30/1710(e)8/4/171-03480
+10(s) 10-Q9/30/1710(a)11/3/171-03480
+10(t)10-Q6/30/1910(b)8/2/191-03480
+10(u)10-Q6/30/1910(c)8/2/191-03480
+10(v)10-Q6/30/1910(d)8/2/191-03480

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 125



Part IV

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit NumberExhibit DescriptionFiled HerewithFormPeriod EndedExhibitFiling DateFile Number
+10(w)10-Q6/30/1910(e)8/2/191-03480
+10(x)10-Q9/30/1910(a)11/1/191-03480
+10(y)X
+10(z) 10-K12/31/1310(ab)2/21/141-03480
+10(u)8-K10.27/2/151-03480
+10(v)8-K10.23/8/161-03480
+10(w)10(aa) 8-K 10.19/21/171-03480
12X
21X     
23X     
31(a)X     

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 113



Part IV

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit NumberExhibit DescriptionFiled HerewithFormPeriod EndedExhibitFiling DateFile Number
31(b)X     
32X     
95X    ��
101.INSXBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document      
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document      
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document      
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document      
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document      
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document      
* Schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted
schedule and/or exhibit will be furnished as a supplement to the SEC upon request.
+ Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. agrees to furnish to the SEC upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt that MDU Resources Group, Inc. has not filed as an exhibit pursuant to the exemption provided by Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K.


 
114126 MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K



Part IV
 

Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
  MDU Resources Group, Inc.
    
Date:February 23, 201821, 2020By:/s/ David L. Goodin
   David L. Goodin
   (President and Chief Executive Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
   
/s/ David L. GoodinChief Executive Officer and DirectorFebruary 23, 201821, 2020
David L. Goodin  
(President and Chief Executive Officer)  
   
/s/ Jason L. VollmerChief Financial OfficerFebruary 23, 201821, 2020
Jason L. Vollmer  
(Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer)  
   
/s/ Stephanie A. BarthChief Accounting OfficerFebruary 23, 201821, 2020
Stephanie A. Barth  
(Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller)  
   
/s/ Harry J. PearceDennis W. JohnsonDirectorFebruary 23, 201821, 2020
Harry J. PearceDennis W. Johnson  
(ChairmanChair of the Board)  
   
/s/ Thomas EveristDirectorFebruary 23, 201821, 2020
Thomas Everist  
   
/s/ Karen B. FaggDirectorFebruary 23, 201821, 2020
Karen B. Fagg  
   
/s/ Mark A. HellersteinDirectorFebruary 23, 201821, 2020
Mark A. Hellerstein
/s/ A. Bart HoladayDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
A. Bart Holaday
/s/ Dennis W. JohnsonDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Dennis W. Johnson
/s/ William E. McCrackenDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
William E. McCracken  
   
/s/ Patricia L. MossDirectorFebruary 23, 201821, 2020
Patricia L. Moss
/s/ Edward A. RyanDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Edward A. Ryan
/s/ David M. SparbyDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
David M. Sparby
/s/ Chenxi WangDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Chenxi Wang  
   
/s/ John K. WilsonDirectorFebruary 23, 201821, 2020
John K. Wilson  

 
MDU Resources Group, Inc. Form 10-K 115127