false2020FY00000731241.66671.6667us-gaap:AccountingStandardsUpdate201613Memberus-gaap:OtherAssetsus-gaap:OtherAssetsus-gaap:OtherLiabilitiesus-gaap:OtherLiabilities0.11us-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMember
Table of Contents




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182020
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromto
Commission File No. 001-36609

NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware36-2723087
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
50 South La Salle Street
Chicago, IllinoisIllinois60603
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312) 630-6000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading SymbolName of Each Exchange On Which Registered
Common Stock, $1.662/3Par Value
NTRSThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Depositary Shares, each representing 1/1000th1,000th interest in a share of Series C
E Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred StockNTRSOThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ¨    No  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerxAccelerated filer¨Emerging growth company
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).    Yes ¨    No  x
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock as of June 29, 201830, 2020 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter), based upon the last sale price of the common stock at June 29, 201830, 2020 as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, held by non-affiliates was approximately $22.8$16.4 billion. Determination of stock ownership by non-affiliates was made solely for the purpose of responding to this requirement and the registrant is not bound by this determination for any other purpose.
At January 31, 2019, 218,411,7732021, 208,314,381 shares of common stock, $1.66 2/3 par value, were outstanding.
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.







NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Page
Item 1
Item 1A
Item 1B
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
Supplemental ItemInformation About Our Executive Officers
Page
Item 1
Item 1A
Item 1B
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
Supplemental Item
Item 5
Item 6
Item 7
Item 7A
Item 8
Supplemental Item 9
Item 9
Item 9A
Item 9B
Item 10
Item 11
Item 12
Item 13
Item 14
Item 15
Item 16

i 20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation





PART I
ITEM 1 – BUSINESS
Northern Trust Corporation
Northern Trust Corporation (Corporation) is a financial holding company that is a leading provider of wealth management, asset servicing, asset management and banking solutions to corporations, institutions, families and individuals. The Corporation conductsis a financial holding company conducting business through various U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries, including The Northern Trust Company (Bank). The Corporation was originally formed as a holding company for the Bank in 1971. The Corporation has a network of offices in 20 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., and across 23 locations in Canada, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region. At December 31, 2018, the Corporation had consolidated total assets of $132.2 billion and stockholders’ equity of $10.5 billion.
The Bank is an Illinois banking corporation headquartered in Chicago and the Corporation’s principal subsidiary. Founded in 1889, the Bank conducts its business through its U.S. operations and its various U.S. and non-U.S. branches and subsidiaries. At December 31, 2018,2020, the Bank had consolidated assets of $131.7$169.6 billion and common bank equity capital of $9.6$10.8 billion.
The Corporation was formed as a holding company for the Bank in 1971. The Corporation has a network of offices in 22 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., and across 22 locations in Canada, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region. At December 31, 2020, the Corporation had consolidated total assets of $170.0 billion and stockholders’ equity of $11.7 billion.
The Corporation expects that the Bank will continue in the foreseeable future to be the major source of the Corporation’s consolidated assets, revenues, and net income. Except where the context otherwise requires, references to “Northern Trust,” “we,” “us,” “our”“our,” “its,” or similar terms mean Northern Trust Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


Business Overview
Northern Trust focuses on managing and servicing client assets through its two client-focused reporting segments: Corporate & Institutional Services (C&IS) and Wealth Management. Asset management and related services are provided to C&IS and Wealth Management clients primarily by the Asset Management business. The revenue and expenses of Asset Management and certain other support functions are allocated fully to C&IS and Wealth Management. Northern Trust reports certain income and expense items not allocated to C&IS and Wealth Management in a third reporting segment, Treasury and Other.


CORPORATE & INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES
C&IS is a leading global provider of asset servicing and related services to corporate and public retirement funds, foundations, endowments, fund managers, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, and other institutional investors around the globe. Asset servicing and related services encompass a full range of capabilities including, but not limited to: custody; fund administration; investment operations outsourcing; investment management; investment risk and analytical services; employee benefit services; securities lending; foreign exchange; treasury management; brokerage services; transition management services; banking; and cash management. Client relationships are managed through the Bank and the Bank’s and the Corporation’s other subsidiaries, including support from locations in North America, Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region. At December 31, 2018,2020, total C&IS assets under custody/administration, assets under custody, and assets under management were $9.49$13.65 trillion, $6.97$10.39 trillion, and $790.8 billion,$1.06 trillion, respectively.


WEALTH MANAGEMENT
Wealth Management focuses on high-net-worth individuals and families, business owners, executives, professionals, retirees, and established privately-held businesses in its target markets. The business also includes the Global Family Office, which provides customized services to meet the complex financial needs of individuals and family offices in the United States and throughout the world with assets typically exceeding $200 million. In supporting these targeted segments, Wealth Management provides trust, investment management, custody, and philanthropic services; financial consulting; guardianship and estate administration; family business consulting; family financial education; brokerage services; and private and business banking.
Wealth Management is one of the largest providers of advisory services in the United States, with assets under custody/administration, assets under custody, and assets under management of $634.8$879.4 billion, $622.9$875.1 billion, and $278.6$347.8 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2018.2020. Wealth Management services are delivered by multidisciplinary teams through a network of offices in 1819 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., as well as offices in London, Guernsey, and Abu Dhabi.


ASSET MANAGEMENT
Asset Management, through the Corporation’s various subsidiaries, supports the C&IS and Wealth Management reporting segments by providing a broad range of asset management and related services and other products to clients around the world. Investment solutions are delivered through separately managed accounts, bank common and collective funds,

20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 1


funds, registered investment companies, exchange traded funds, non-U.S. collective investment funds, and unregistered private investment funds. Asset Management’s capabilities include active and passive equity; active and passive fixed income; cash management; multi-asset and alternative asset classes (such as private equity and hedge funds of funds); and multi-manager advisory services and products. Asset Management’s activities also include overlay services and other risk management services. Asset Management operates internationally through subsidiaries and distribution arrangements and its revenue and expense are fully allocated to C&IS and Wealth Management. As discussed above, Northern Trust managed $1.07$1.41 trillion in assets as of December 31, 2018,2020, including $790.8 billion$1.06 trillion for C&IS clients and $278.6$347.8 billion for Wealth Management clients.


Competition
Northern Trust faces intense competition in all aspects and areas of its business. Competition comes from both regulated and unregulated financial services organizations, whose products and services span the local, national, and global markets in which Northern Trust conducts operations. Our competitors include a broad range of financial institutions and service companies, including other custodial banks, deposit-taking institutions, asset management firms, benefits consultants, trust companies, investment banking firms, insurance companies, investment counseling firms, and various financial technology companies, including software providers and data services firms. As our businesses grow and markets evolve, we may encounter increasing and new forms of competition around the world.
Northern Trust’s principal business strategy is to provide quality financial services to targeted market segments in which it believes it has a competitive advantage and favorable growth prospects. As part of this strategy, Northern Trust seeks to deliver a level of service that distinguishes itdifferentiate itself from its competitors.competitors with premier, holistic solutions and exceptional experiences tailored to meet clients’ needs. In addition, Northern Trust emphasizes the development and growth of recurring sources of fee-based income. Northern Trust seeks to developincome and expand its recurring fee-based revenue by identifying select markets with attractive growth characteristics and providing a high level of individualized service to clients in those markets.continual productivity improvements. Northern Trust also seeks to preservemaintain its asset quality through established credit review procedures and to maintainfoundational strength with a strong, conservative balance sheet.sheet and a globally respected brand.


Economic Conditions And Government Policies
The earnings of Northern Trust are affected by numerous external influences. Chief among these are general economic conditions, both domestic and international, and actions that governments and their central banks take in managing their economies. These general conditions affect all of Northern Trust’s businesses, as well as the quality, value, and profitability of theirits loan and investment portfolios.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board) implements monetary policy through its open market operations in United States Government securities, its setting of the discount rate at which member banks may borrow from Federal Reserve Banks, and its changes in the reserve requirements for deposits. The policies adopted by the Federal Reserve Board directly affect interest rates and therefore what banks earn on their loans and investments and what they pay on their savings and time deposits and other purchased funds.


Supervision Andand Regulation
Northern Trust is subject to extensive regulation under state and federal laws in the United States as well as the applicable laws ofand in each of the various jurisdictions outside the United States in which Northern Trustit does business. The discussion below outlines significant elements of selected laws and regulations applicable to Northern Trust. Changes in these laws or regulations or their application, cannot be predicted, butapplicable to Northern Trust may have a material effect on Northern Trust’sits businesses and results of operations.


FINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANY REGULATION
Under U.S. law, the Corporation is a bank holding company that has elected to be a financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (BHCA). Consequently, the Corporation and its business activities throughout the world are subject to the supervision, examination, and regulation of the Federal Reserve Board. The BHCA and other federal laws subject bank andA financial holding companies to particular restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage and to a range of supervisory requirements, including enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations. Supervision and regulation of bank holding companies, financial holding companies, and their subsidiaries are intended primarily for the protection of depositors and other clients of banking subsidiaries, the Deposit Insurance Fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the banking system as a whole, not for the protection of stockholders or other nondepository creditors.
Under the BHCA, bank holding companies and their banking subsidiaries are generally limited to the business of banking and activities closely related or incidental to banking. As a financial holding company the Corporation is permitted to engage in othera broader range of financial activities that the Federal Reserve Board determines to be financial in nature, incidental to an activity that is financial in nature, or complementary to a financial activity and that do not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally, or to acquire shares of companies engaged

2   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




in such activities. Activities defined to be financial in nature include: providing financial or investment advice; securities underwriting and dealing; insurance underwriting; and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial companies, subject to significant limitations. They also include activities previously determined by the Federal Reserve Board to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. The Corporation may not, however, directly or indirectly acquire the ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of voting shares, or substantially all of the assets, of a bank holding company or a bank, without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board.
In order tocompany. To maintain the Corporation’s status as a financial holding company, the Bank asand the Corporation’s sole insured depository institution subsidiary,Corporation must remain “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” under applicable regulations,“well-managed,” and the Bank must have received at least a “satisfactory” rating in its most recent examination under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). In addition, as a result of the amendment of the BHCA by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), as discussed further below, the Corporation must remain “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” in order to maintain its status as a financial holding company. examination. Failure to meet one or more of these requirements would mean, dependingmay result in restrictions on the requirements not met, that the Corporation could not undertakeCorporation’s ability to exercise powers granted to financial holding companies, to engage in new activities, to continue certaincurrent activities, or to make acquisitions other than those permitted generally for bank holding companies.acquisitions.


SUBSIDIARY REGULATION
The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System, its eligiblewith deposits are insured by the FDIC up to the maximum authorized limit,Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and it is subject to regulation by both these agencies. As an Illinois banking corporation, the Bank is also subject to Illinois state laws and regulations and to examination and supervision by the Division of Banking of the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation. The Bank is also registered as a transfer agent with the Federal Reserve Board and is therefore subject to the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board in this area.
The Bank is registered provisionally as a swap dealer with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission



2 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




(CFTC) under the Commodity Exchange ActAct. As a result, the Bank is subject to supervision, examination and enforcement by certain other regulatory bodies, including the CFTC and the National Futures Association (NFA).
The Corporation’s nonbanking affiliates are subject to examination by the Federal Reserve Board and, in certain circumstances, other functional regulators. The Corporation’s broker-dealer subsidiary is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA). AsFinancial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a provisionally registered swapbroker-dealer, investment adviser, and municipal securities dealer, the Bankand is subject to significant regulatory obligations regarding swap activitythe rules and the supervision, examination and enforcement powersregulations of the CFTC, NFA, and other regulators.these bodies. Certain of the Corporation’s othernonbanking affiliates are registered with the CFTC as commodity trading advisors and commodity pool operators under the Commodity Exchange Act, are members of the NFA, and are subject to that actsupervision and the associated rules and regulations ofregulation by the CFTC and NFA.
The Corporation’s nonbanking affiliates are all subject to examination by the Federal Reserve Board. Its broker-dealer subsidiary is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a broker-dealer and an investment adviser and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, subject to the rules and regulations of both of these bodies. The Corporation’s broker-dealer subsidiary also is registered with the SEC and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board as a municipal securities dealer. Several Other subsidiaries of the Corporation are registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and are subject to that act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Those subsidiaries also act as investment advisers to various mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and hedge funds of funds that are subject to regulation by the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Other subsidiaries areSEC. Subsidiaries may also be regulated by state regulators in various states.

FUNCTIONAL REGULATION
Federal banking law has established a system of federal and state supervision and regulation based on functional regulation, meaning that primary regulatory oversight for a particular activity generally resides with the federal or state regulator designated as having the principal responsibility for that activity. Banking is supervised by federal and state banking regulators, insurance by state insurance regulators, derivatives activities by the CFTC, and securities activities by the SEC and state securities regulators.
A significant component of the functional regulation relates to the application of federal securities laws and SEC oversight of some bank securities activities. Generally, banks may conduct securities activities without broker-dealer registration only if the activities fall within a set of activity-based exemptions designed to allow banks to conduct only those activities traditionally considered to be primarily banking or trust activities. Securities activities outside these exemptions, as a practical matter, need to be conducted by a registered broker-dealer affiliate. The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 requires the registration of any bank or separately identifiable division of the bank that acts as an investment adviser to a registered investment company.
Another component of the functional regulation relates to the application of federal commodity and derivatives laws and CFTC oversight of some bank commodity and derivatives activities, including swap-dealing activities.


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 3




THE DODD-FRANK ACT, AS AMENDED
The Dodd-Frank Act has had a broad impact on the financial services industry, imposing significant new regulatory and compliance requirements, including the imposition of increased capital, leverage, and liquidity requirements, and numerous other provisions designed to improve supervision and oversight of, and strengthen safety and soundness within, the financial services sector. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act established a new framework of authority to conduct systemic risk oversight within the U.S. financial system to be distributed among new and existing federal regulatory agencies, including the U.S. Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Federal Reserve Board, and the FDIC. In May 2018, the U.S. Congress passed, and the President signed, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the “Regulatory Relief Act”), which revised parts of the Dodd-Frank Act and directed the Federal Reserve Board and other federal regulators to revise parts of their regulations. The Federal Reserve Board has finalized or proposed some of the regulatory changes required by the Regulatory Relief Act, but other required changes remain to be finalized and/or proposed. The Corporation cannot predict what changes may occur to the Dodd-Frank Act as a result of the Regulatory Relief Act or the ultimate effect such changes would have on the Corporation. The following items provide a brief description of certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), as implemented through final rules promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board and other agencies and amended that currently areby the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the Regulatory Relief Act), most relevant to the Corporation and its subsidiaries, including the Bank.

Enhanced Prudential Standards. The Dodd-Frank Act, imposedas implemented by the Federal Reserve Board through various rulemakings and amended by the Regulatory Relief Act, generally imposes enhanced prudential requirements on U.S. bank holding companies with at least $50$100 billion in total consolidated assets, including the Corporation. The enhanced prudential standards include more stringent risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity, risk management, and stress testing requirements and single counterparty credit limits for large bank holding companies, including the Corporation. The Federal Reserve Board also has the discretion to require these large U.S. bank holding companies to limit their short-term debt, to issue contingent capital instruments, and to provide enhanced public disclosures. The
In October 2019, the Federal Reserve Board has issued final rulesfinalized a proposed rule implementing changes made by the Regulatory Relief Act. This rule introduced a new four-category framework to determine which enhanced prudential standards for more stringentand other requirements are applicable to institutions with total consolidated assets of at least $100 billion, based on asset thresholds and other risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity, risk management, stress testing requirements, and aggregate credit exposure limits.factors. Under the finalnew rules, the Corporation is classified as a Category II institution.
The requirements under the new framework that apply to the Corporation are largely unchanged as a result of the Federal Reserve Board’s final tailoring rule for enhanced prudential standards. The Corporation must submit annual capital plans to the Federal Reserve Board, be subject to supervisor-conductedconduct supervisory and internal periodic stress tests to evaluate capital adequacy in adverse economic conditions, conduct capital stress tests, implementmaintain enhanced risk management procedures, comply with a liquidity risk management framework (discussed below in “Liquidity Standards”) and aggregate credit exposure limits, conduct liquidity stress tests, and hold a buffer of liquid assets estimated to meet funding needs during a financial stress event. The Federal Reserve Board also has proposed rules that would implement early remediation requirements that are required to be established under section 166 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Regulatory Relief Act immediately increased the threshold for imposing enhanced prudential standards on U.S. bank holding companies from $50 billion to $100 billion in total consolidated assets. This threshold will further increase to $250 billion in November 2019 for all U.S. bank holding companies, but the Federal Reserve Board retains the ability to apply enhanced prudential standards to certain U.S. bank holding companies with between $100 billion and $250 billion in total consolidated assets. To implement this change, in October 2018, the Federal Reserve Board proposed creating risk-based categories of banking organizations, each of which would be subject to a tailored set of the enhanced prudential standards. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated that, assuming it finalizes the October 2018 proposal without further modification, the Corporation will be a Category II institution, which means that the Corporation would remain subject to the existing enhanced prudential standards described above, but wouldis not be subject to the total loss-absorbing capacity requirement, capital surcharge, enhanced supplementary leverage ratio, or aggregate credit exposure limit that apply to U.S. bank holding companies that are global systemically important bank holding companies. As of the date of this report, the Federal Reserve Board has not finalized the October 2018 proposal and the Corporation cannot predict whether the October 2018 proposal will be finalized and whether such finalization would alter the way in which the enhanced prudential standards are applied to the Corporation.
Resolution Planning. As required by Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC jointly issued a final rule that requires each U.S. bank holding company with at least $50 billion in total consolidated assets, including the Corporation is required to submit periodically to regulators a resolution plan for such bank holding company’sits rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure. In addition, theunder an FDIC issued a final rule (the “CIDICIDI Resolution Plan Rule”) that requires insured depository institutions with more than $50 billion in total assets, includingRule) the Bank tomust submit to the FDIC periodic plans for resolution in the event of such institution’sits failure. The Regulatory Relief Act immediately raised the threshold for application of the resolution planning requirement to $100 billion, and this threshold will further increase to $250 billion in November 2019, although the Federal Reserve Board retains the ability to apply enhanced prudential standards to certain U.S. bank holding companies with between $100 billion and $250 billion in total consolidated assets. The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have indicated that in light of the Regulatory Relief Act, the agencies will publish proposals and solicit comment on revisions to the resolution planning requirements. Until such time as the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC propose and finalize changes to the resolution

4   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




planning requirements, the Corporation and the Bank will be required to submit resolution plans pursuant to the existing rules; provided, however, that the agencies have indicated that the Corporation is not required to submit a Section 165(d) resolution plan before December 31, 2019 and the FDIC has indicated that the Bank is not required to submit an insured depository institution resolution plan before July 1, 2020.
On March 24, 2017,29, 2019, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC provided joint written feedback to the Corporation regarding the resolution plan submitted by the Corporation in December 20152017, pursuant to Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act (the “20152017 165(d) Plan”)Plan). The joint written feedback identified certain “shortcomings” in the Corporation’s 2015 165(d) Plan. While the identification of these shortcomings is different from a determinationstated that the plan is not “credible”, the Corporation was required to address the shortcomings in a satisfactory manner in the Corporation’s resolution plan to be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC did not identify shortcomings or deficiencies in the FDIC2017 165(d) Plan. The Corporation is required to submit its next Section 165(d) resolution plan by December 31, 2017. This plan was submitted on December 19, 2017 (the “2017 165(d) Plan”). If17, 2021, and it must address the informational content specified in a guidance letter issued by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC jointly decide that the 2017 165(d) Plan fails to address the identified shortcomings in a satisfactory manner, then the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC could jointly determine that the 2017 165(d) Plan is not credible or would not facilitate an orderly resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In the event of such a joint determination, the Corporation could be subject to more stringent capital, leverage or liquidity requirements, restrictions on growth, activities or operations, or be required to divest certain assets or operations. To date, no formal written feedback or guidance has been received regarding the 2017 165(d) Plan. December 2020.
In addition, on June 27, 2018, the Bank submitted its resolution plan (the “20182018 CIDI Plan”)Plan) to the FDIC under the CIDI Resolution Plan Rule. To date, no formal written feedback or guidance has been received regarding the 2018 CIDI Plan. On January 19, 2021, the FDIC announced that it will resume requiring resolution plan submissions for insured depository institutions with $100 billion or more in assets. The FDIC announcement indicated that no firm will be required to submit a resolution plan without at least 12 months advance notice provided to the firm. To date, the Bank has not received notice from the FDIC indicating its next resolution plan submission date.
Separately, the European Union Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), was adopted for European Union credit institutions, including certain of the Bank’s subsidiaries and branches, effective January 1, 2015. In accordance with applicable Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) guidance, a recovery planSimplified Recovery Plan for Northern Trust Global Services Limited (since reincorporated as Northern Trust Global Services SE),SE, a UK incorporatedLuxembourg-registered indirect subsidiary of the Bank, has been established and will be
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 3




reviewed and filed with the CSSF at least annually. PRA guidancebiennially. CSSF regulations also requiresrequire institutions to produce resolution planning information. In accordance with such guidance,submit resolution-related data on an annual basis, a resolution packrequirement for which Northern Trust Global Services SE and the Bank’s London branch has been prepared and such information will be reviewed every two years.an established process.
The Corporation and the Bank have and will continue to focus management attention and substantial resources to meet U.S. and European regulatory expectations with respect to these resolution planning requirements.
Orderly Liquidation Authority. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, certain financial companies, such as the Corporation and certain of its covered subsidiaries, can be subjected to an orderly liquidation authority. For the orderly liquidation authority to apply, the U.S. Treasury Secretary, in consultation with the President of the United States, must make a determination, among other things, that the Corporation isif in default or danger of default the failure of the Corporation and itstheir resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would have serious adverse effects on financial stability in the United States, no viable private sector alternative is available to prevent the default of the Corporation, and orderly liquidation authority proceedings would mitigate these adverse effects. This determination must be recommendedamong other requirements set by two-thirds of the FDIC Board of Directors and two-thirds of the Federal Reserve Board. Absent such actions, the Corporation, as a bank holding company, would remain subject to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.statute. If the Corporation were subject to orderly liquidation authority, the FDIC would be appointed as its receiver, which would give the FDIC considerable powers to resolve the Corporation. Absent such actions, the Corporation, including: (1) the power to remove officers and directors and appoint new ones; (2) the power to assign assets and liabilities toas a third party or bridge financialbank holding company, without the need for creditor consent or prior court review; (3) the ability to differentiate among creditors, including by treating junior creditors better than senior creditors,would remain subject to a minimum recovery right to receive at least what such senior creditors would have received in bankruptcy liquidation; and (4) broad powers to administer the claims process to determine distributions from the assets of the receivership to creditors not transferred to a third party or bridge financial institution.U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
The Volcker Rule. The Volcker Rule bans proprietary trading subject to exceptions for market-making, hedging, certain trading activities in U.S. and foreign sovereign debt, certain trading activities of non-U.S. banking entities trading outside the United States, certain customer-driven matched swaps, and trading activities related to liquidity management. The Volcker Rule also maintainsimposes significant restrictions on sponsoring or investing in certain “covered funds,” such as hedge funds or private equity funds. A banking entity may “organize and offer” certain private funds, only if certain requirements are satisfied. Moreover, a banking entity only may retain a limited ownership interest in such funds, and must monitor and track investments in such covered funds carefullyagain subject to ensure that the ownership interest in the fund does not exceed regulatory thresholds. Generally, a banking entity that sponsors or invests in certain private funds is also restricted from providing credit or other support to the funds or permitting the funds to use the name of the bank. The Volcker Rule requires large banking entities, including the Corporation, to implement a detailed compliance program and, on an annual basis, requires the Chief Executive Officer of the banking entity to attest that the compliance program is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the rule. Compliance with the Volcker Rule generally has been required since July 21, 2015.exceptions. Northern Trust has conducted an

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 5



enterprise-wide review of affected activities, taken steps to bring those activities into conformance, and has establishedmaintains an enterprise-wide compliance program to comply with the Volcker Rule.
In July 2018, the Federal Reserve Board and other federal regulatory agencies having oversight over the Volcker Rule proposed amendments to the rule. The notice of proposed rulemaking contains certain revisions to the Volcker Rule’s restrictions. Northern Trust is evaluating the proposal to determine the impact such proposal will have, if any, if it becomes effective, but as of the date of this report, no final rule amendments have been issued. The full impact of the Volcker Rule on Northern Trust ultimately will depend on the finalization of the July 2018 proposed amendments and further interpretation and guidance by the regulatory agencies responsible for its enforcement. Northern Trust is monitoring developments with respect to the Volcker Rule actively and will revise further its operations and compliance programs as appropriate or required.
Swaps and Other Derivatives. Title VII of the The Dodd-Frank Act (Title VII) imposesimposed a regulatory structure on the over-the-counter derivatives market, including requirements for clearing, exchange trading, capital, margin, trade reporting, and recordkeeping. Title VIIThe Dodd-Frank Act also requires certain personsentities to register as a “major swap participant,” a “swap dealer,” a “major-security-based swap participant” or a “security-based swap dealer.” The CFTC has finalized most rules further defining these registrant categories, while the SEC continuesBank is required to draft rules related to security-based swaps. The CFTC’s Title VII rules and regulations are applicable to the Bank’s activityregister as a swap dealer and includeits swap dealer activities are subject to the CFTC’s rules related toand regulations, including rules regarding internal and external business conduct standards, reporting and recordkeeping, mandatory clearing for certain swaps, and trade documentation and confirmation requirements, and applied certain regulatory requirements to cross-border swap activities. In addition, theThe Bank is also subject to Federal Reserve Board has finalized regulations applicable to the Bank regarding mandatory posting and collection of margin by certain swap counterparties. TheSeveral of the SEC’s rules relatedrequirements for security-based swap dealers came into effect on April 6, 2020. Under those requirements, persons or entities must begin counting security-based swap activities on August 6, 2021, and may be required to security-based swaps are not currently applicable toregister with the Bank’s swap dealing activity and the Bank’s current trading activity does not mandate its regulationSEC as a security-based swap dealer. Northern Trust continuesdealer after October 6, 2021. The Corporation does not expect that it, or any of its affiliates, will be required to monitor Title VII-related regulatory developments and will revise further its operations and/or swaps compliance programregister as appropriate or required.a security-based swap dealer with the SEC.
Incentive Compensation Arrangements. The Dodd-Frank Act requires federal regulators to prescribe regulations or guidelines regarding incentive-based compensation practices at certain large financial institutions. No final rule has been issued to date.


HOLDING COMPANY SUPPORT UNDER THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT
The Dodd-Frank Act amended the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) to obligate the Federal Reserve Board to require bank holding companies, such as the Corporation, to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength for any subsidiary depository institution. The term “source of financial strength” is defined as the ability of a company to provide financial assistance to its insured depository institution subsidiaries in the event of financial distress at such subsidiaries. Under this requirement, the Corporation in the future could be required to provide financial assistance to the Bank should the Bank experience financial distress.


PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS
The Corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. The Corporation may pay dividends, repurchase stock, and make other capital distributions only in accordance with athe capital plan that has been reviewed byrules and capital adequacy standards of the Federal Reserve Board, and as to whichincluding the Federal Reserve Board has not objected. Astress capital buffer requirement, discussed further at “—Capital Adequacy Requirements” below. Dividends from the Bank are a significant source of funds for the Corporation, is dividends from the Bank. As a result,and the Corporation’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock will dependtherefore depends on the ability of the Bank to pay sufficient dividends to the Corporation.
Various other federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by the Bank to the Corporation without regulatory consent. The Bank may not pay any dividends if it is undercapitalized, or if the payment of the dividend would cause it to become undercapitalized. In general, the amount of dividends that may be paid in a calendar year is limited to its “recent earnings” (the current year’s net income combined with the retained net income of the two preceding years), or its “undivided profits” (generally, accumulated net profits that have not been paid out as dividends or transferred to surplus), whichever is less. The ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Corporation in amounts sufficientmay also be affected by the capital adequacy standards applicable to service its obligations and fund dividend payments. Dividend payments from the Bank are subject to Illinois law(discussed further below), which include minimum requirements and to regulatory limitations, generally based on capital levels and current and retained earnings, imposed by various regulatory agencies with authority over the Bank. The ability of the Bank to pay dividends is also subject to regulatory restrictions if paying dividends would impair its profitability, financial condition or cash flow requirements.buffers.
Various federal and state statutory provisions limit the amount of dividends the Bank can pay to the Corporation without regulatory approval. Approval of the Federal Reserve Board is required for payment of any dividend by a state-chartered bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System if the total of all dividends declared by the bank in any calendar year (including any prospective dividend) would exceed the total of its retained net income (as defined by regulatory agencies) for that year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years. In addition, a state member bank may not pay a dividend in an amount greater than its “undivided profits,” as defined, without regulatory and stockholder approval.
The Bank is also prohibited under federal law from paying any dividends if the Bank is undercapitalized or if the payment of the dividends would cause the Bank to become undercapitalized. In addition, the federal regulatory agencies are authorized to prohibit a bank or bank holding company from engaging in an unsafe or unsound banking practice. The payment of dividends could, depending on the financial condition of the Bank, be deemed to constitute an unsafe or

6   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




unsound practice. The Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III (as defined and discussed further below) impose additional restrictions on the ability of banking institutions to pay dividends.


CAPITAL PLANNING AND STRESS TESTING
The Corporation’s capital distributions are subject to the Federal Reserve Board’s capital plan rules, which require the Corporation to submit annual capital plans to the Federal Reserve Board oversight. for review.
The major componentcomponents of that oversight isare the Federal Reserve Board’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) exercise, implementing itsand Dodd-Frank Act stress tests (DFAST). These requirements involve both company-run and supervisory-run testing of capital plan rules. These rules require bank holding companies having $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets (including the Corporation) to submit annual capital plans to their respective Federal Reserve Bank. The Corporation also is required to collectunder various scenarios, including baseline and report certain related data on a quarterly basis to allow the Federal Reserve Board to monitor progress against the annual capital plans. The CCAR exercise is an intensive assessment of the capital adequacy of bank holding companies as well as of the processes used by certain bank holding companies to assess their capital needs. Through CCAR, the Federal Reserve Board assesses whether bank holding companies have robust, forward-looking capital planning processes that account for their unique risks and that permit continued operations during times of economic and financial stress. The Corporation and other affected bank holding companies may pay dividends, repurchase stock, and make other capital distributions only in accordance with a capital plan as to which the Federal Reserve Board has not objected. The Federal Reserve Board may object to a capital plan for a number of reasons, including if the capital plan does not show that the covered bank holding company will meet, for each quarter throughout the nine-quarter planning horizon coveredseverely adverse scenarios provided by the capital plan, all minimum regulatory capital ratios under applicable capital rules as in effect for that quarter, as well as all minimum regulatory capital ratios on a pro forma basis underappropriate banking regulator. Results from the base caseCorporation’s and stressful scenarios. The capital plan rules also stipulate that a covered bank holding company may not make a capital distribution, unless after giving effectthe Bank’s annual company-run stress tests are reported to the distribution, it will meet all minimum regulatory capital ratios.
On January 30, 2017, the Federal Reserve Board announced modifications to capital planappropriate regulators and stress testing rules. Under the modified final rules, the qualitative assessment of CCAR was removed for bank holding companies with total consolidated assets between $50 billion and $250 billion, irrespective of the amount of on-balance-sheet foreign exposure held by such bank holding companies. As a result, capital plans submitted by the Corporation currently are no longer subject to objection from the Federal Reserve Board on qualitative grounds. In lieu of the qualitative assessment of CCAR, the Corporation is subject to a horizontal capital review (HCR), focusing on specific areas of capital planning, conducted as part of the Federal Reserve Board’s normal supervisory process. Any supervisory findings resulting from the HCR are addressed through supervisory communications. Capital plans submitted by the Corporation remain subject to objection from the Federal Reserve Board on quantitative grounds.made publicly available.
The Corporation submitted its capital plan for the Federal Reserve Board’s 2020 CCAR exercise in April 2020 and, in November 2020, resubmitted the plan at the Federal Reserve Board’s request to reflect stresses from the COVID-19



4 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




pandemic. On June 25, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board in April 2018 as part of the Federal Reserve Board’s 2018 CCAR exercise,imposed restrictions that were designed to cause large bank holding companies to preserve capital, including suspending share repurchases, capping dividend payments, and only allowing common stock dividends according to a formula based on recent income. On December 18, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board did not objectextended a portion of these restrictions to the Corporation’s plan. The Corporation will submit its 2019 capital plan to the Federal Reserve Board by April 5, 2019. The Federal Reserve Board is expected to publish either its objection or non-objection to the 2019 capital planlimit share repurchases and proposed capital actions, such as dividend payments based on recent income. These restrictions apply for the first quarter of 2021 and share repurchases, in mid-2019.may be extended further.
In addition to the CCAR stress testing requirements, Federal Reserve Board regulations include Dodd-Frank Act stress tests (DFAST). Under the DFAST regulations, the Corporation is required to undergo regulatory stress tests conducted by the Federal Reserve Board annually, and to conduct internal stress tests pursuant to regulatory requirements semi-annually.annually. The Bank also is required to conduct its own annual internal stress test (although it is permitted to combine certain reporting and disclosure of its stress test results with the results of the Corporation). These requirements involve both company-run and supervisory-run testing of capital under various scenarios, including baseline, adverse and severely adverse scenarios provided by the appropriate banking regulator. Results from the Corporation’s and the Bank’s annual company-run stress tests are reported to the appropriate regulators and published.made publicly available. Northern Trust published the results of its company-run stress tests on June 21, 2018, and the results of its company-run mid-cycle stress tests on October 31, 2018.
In April 2018, the Federal Reserve Board proposed revisions to the CCAR exercise and DFAST regulations that would in part integrate the forward-looking stress test results with the non-stress capital requirements discussed below by using the results of the annual supervisory stress test to set specific buffer requirements above minimum capital requirements, which restrict capital distributions under the capital rule and establish a single approach to capital distribution limitations. The April 2018 proposal also would replace the 2.5% capital conservation buffer requirement with a stress capital buffer requirement and establish a stress leverage buffer requirement in addition to the minimum 4% Tier 1 leverage ratio requirement. Under the April 2018 proposal, an institution would be required to maintain capital ratios above its minimum plus its buffer requirements in order to avoid restrictions on its capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. An institution would be bound by the most stringent distribution limitations, if any, as determined by its capital conservation buffer requirement, its stress leverage buffer requirement and, if applicable, its advanced approaches capital conservation buffer requirement and enhanced supplementary leverage ratio standard.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 7



The April 2018 proposal also would remove the stress testing assumption that an institution would make all planned capital distributions over the planning horizon, including any planned common stock dividends and repurchases of common stock. Instead, the stress buffer requirements would include only four quarters of planned common stock dividends in order to preserve the incentives for an institution to engage in disciplined, forward-looking dividend planning. Further, the April 2018 proposal would adjust the methodology used in the supervisory stress test to assume that the institution takes actions to maintain a constant level of assets, including loans, trading assets, and securities over the planning horizon and assume that the institution’s risk-weighted assets and leverage ratio denominator generally remain unchanged over the planning horizon. The April 2018 proposal also would remove the quantitative objection in CCAR and eliminate the 30 percent dividend payout ratio as a criterion for heightened scrutiny of an institution's capital plan. The Federal Reserve Board would retain the CCAR qualitative supervisory review and the ability to object to an institution’s capital plan on qualitative grounds based on the adequacy of the institution’s capital planning processes (qualitative objection) for institutions supervised by the Large Institution Supervision Coordination Committee and other large and complex institutions.
Separately, the Regulatory Relief Act immediately raised the threshold for application of DFAST regulations to $100 billion, and this threshold will further increase to $250 billion in November 2019. However, the Regulatory Relief Act did not directly affect the CCAR exercise. In its October 2018 proposal described above, the Federal Reserve Board proposed that the Corporation will be subject to the qualitative and quantitative assessments of the CCAR exercise and the DFAST regulations, but did not address the April 2018 proposal. As of the date of this filing, the Federal Reserve Board has not finalized the April 2018 or October 2018 proposals, and the Corporation cannot predict whether either proposal will be finalized and whether such finalization would alter the way in which the CCAR exercise and DFAST regulations are applied to the Corporation.
Additionally, on December 21, 2018, the Federal Reserve Board announced it will not incorporate the current expected credit losses methodology (CECL) from Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13 into its supervisory stress tests until at least 2022 to reduce uncertainty, allow for better capital planning at affected firms, and allow the Federal Reserve Board to gather additional information on the impact of CECL. The Federal Reserve Board will still require banking organizations subject to company-run stress test requirements as part of the CCAR exercise to incorporate CECL into their internal stress testing processes beginning in25, 2020.


CAPITAL ADEQUACY REQUIREMENTS
The regulators viewCorporation, as a bank holding company, is subject to risk-based and leverage capital levels as important indicators of an institution’s financial soundness. As a general matter, FDIC-insured depository institutions and their holding companies (includingguidelines implemented by the Bank and the Corporation)Federal Reserve Board that are required to maintain minimum capital relative to the amount and types of assets they hold. The final supervisory determination on an institution’s capital adequacy is based on the regulator’s assessment of numerous factors.
The risk-based capitalindustry-standard guidelines that apply to the Corporation and the Bank are based upon the 2011 capital accord ofpublished by the International Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee), a committee of central banks and bank supervisors,known as implemented by the Federal Reserve Board (Basel III).Basel III. The Basel III rules are currently being phased in, and will come into full effect by January 1, 2022.
To implement Basel III for bank holding companies, including the Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board established risk-based and leverage capital guidelines. The federal banking regulatorsBank, as an FDIC-insured depository institution, is also establishedrequired to meet risk-based and leverage capital guidelines that FDIC-insured depository institutions, such as the Bank, are required to meet. These regulationsestablished by regulators which are generally similar to those established by the Federal Reserve Board for bank holding companies. The Bank’s risk-based and leverage capital ratios remained strong at December 31, 2018, and were well above the minimum regulatory requirements established by U.S. banking regulators.
Under the final Basel III rules, the Corporation, with the Bank, is one of a small number of “core” banking organizations. The rules require core banking organizations to have rigorous processes for assessing overall capital adequacy in relation to their total risk profiles, and to disclose publicly certain information about their risk profiles and capital adequacy. In order to implement the capital rules, a core banking organization such as the Corporation,that is required to complete satisfactorily a parallel run, in which it calculates capital requirements under both the Basel III rules and previously effective regulations. The Corporation and the Bank completed their parallel runs in 2014 and are required to use the advanced approaches methodologies to calculate and disclose publicly theirits risk-based capital ratios.
Pursuant to the Federal Reserve Board’s implementation in the final Basel III rules of a provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, the The Corporation also is subject to a capital floor that is based on the Basel III standardized approach.approach to calculating risk-based capital ratios. The Corporation is therefore required to calculate its risk-based capital ratios under both the standardized and advanced approaches, and is subject to the more stringent of the risk-based capital ratios as calculated under the standardized approach and the advanced approachtwo in the assessment of its capital adequacy.

8   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




The Bank’s risk-based and leverage capital ratios at December 31, 2020, were well above the regulatory requirements established by U.S. banking regulators. The risk-based and leverage capital ratios for the Corporation and the Bank, together with the regulatory minimum ratios and the ratios required for classification as “well-capitalized,” are provided in the following chart.


TABLE 1: RISK-BASED AND LEVERAGE CAPITAL RATIOS AS OFDECEMBER 31, 20182020
COMMON EQUITY
TIER 1 CAPITAL
TIER 1 CAPITALTOTAL CAPITALTIER 1 LEVERAGE
SUPPLEMENTARY LEVERAGE(1)
STANDARDIZED
APPROACH
ADVANCED
APPROACH
STANDARDIZED
APPROACH
ADVANCED
APPROACH
STANDARDIZED
APPROACH
ADVANCED
APPROACH
STANDARDIZED
APPROACH
ADVANCED
APPROACH
ADVANCED
APPROACH
Northern Trust Corporation12.8 %13.4 %13.9 %14.5 %15.6 %15.9 %7.6 %7.6 %8.6 %
The Northern Trust Company13.0 %13.8 %13.0 %13.8 %14.5 %15.0 %7.0 %7.0 %7.7 %
Minimum required ratio4.5 %4.5 %6.0 %6.0 %8.0 %8.0 %4.0 %4.0 %3.0 %
“Well-capitalized” minimum ratios, as applicable
Northern Trust CorporationN/AN/A6.0 %6.0 %10.0 %10.0 %N/AN/AN/A
The Northern Trust Company6.5 %6.5 %8.0 %8.0 %10.0 %10.0 %5.0 %5.0 %3.0 %
 
COMMON EQUITY
TIER 1 CAPITAL
TIER 1 CAPITALTOTAL CAPITALTIER 1 LEVERAGESUPPLEMENTARY LEVERAGE
 
ADVANCED
APPROACH

STANDARDIZED
APPROACH

ADVANCED
APPROACH

STANDARDIZED
APPROACH

ADVANCED
APPROACH

STANDARDIZED
APPROACH

ADVANCED
APPROACH

STANDARDIZED
APPROACH

ADVANCED
APPROACH

Northern Trust Corporation13.7%12.9%15.0%14.1%16.9%16.1%8.0%8.0%7.0%
The Northern Trust Company14.1%13.1%14.1%13.1%15.8%14.8%7.3%7.3%6.4%
Minimum required ratio4.5%4.5%6.0%6.0%8.0%8.0%4.0%4.0%3.0%
“Well-capitalized” minimum ratios, as applicable         
Northern Trust CorporationN/A
N/A
6.0%6.0%10.0%10.0%N/A
N/A
N/A
The Northern Trust Company6.5%6.5%8.0%8.0%10.0%10.0%5.0%5.0%3.0%
(1) In November 2019, the Federal Reserve and other U.S. federal banking agencies adopted a final rule that established a deduction for central bank deposits from the total leverage exposures of custodial banking organizations, including Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust Company, equal to the lesser of (i) the total amount of funds the custodial banking organization and its consolidated subsidiaries have on deposit at qualifying central banks and (ii) the total amount of client funds on deposit at the custodial banking organization that are linked to fiduciary or custodial and safekeeping accounts. The rule became effective on April 1, 2020.

InFurther, on April 1, 2020, the Federal Reserve issued an interim final rule that requires bank holding companies, including Northern Trust Corporation, to deduct, on a temporary basis, deposits with the Federal Reserve and investments in U.S. Treasury securities from their total leverage exposure. The U.S. Treasury securities deduction is applied in addition to the above, ascentral bank deposits relief referred to above. This rule became effective on April 1, 2020 and will remain in effect through the first quarter of January 1 2018, advanced2021. On May 15, 2020, the U.S. federal banking agencies released an interim final rule that permits insured depository institutions of bank holding companies also to temporarily exclude deposits with the Federal Reserve and investments in U.S. Treasury securities from their total leverage exposure. The Northern Trust Company did not elect to take this deduction.
The supplementary leverage ratios at December 31, 2020 for the Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust Company reflect the impact of these final rules.
Advanced approaches institutions, such as the Corporation and the Bank, must comply with a supplementary leverage ratio. Under the supplementary leverage ratio rule, advanced approaches institutions are subject to a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 3.0%. Insured depositoryAdvanced approaches institutions that are advanced approachesinsured depository institutions, such as the Bank, also are required tomust maintain at least a 3.0% supplementary leverage ratio to be considered “well-capitalized” under“well-capitalized.” The Corporation is also subject to a stress capital buffer, which integrates forward-looking stress test results with non-stress capital requirements, and the rule. The supplementary leverage ratio differs from the leverage ratio in that the leverage ratio does not take into account certain off-balance-sheet assets and exposures that are reflected in the supplementary leverage ratio.
Basel IIIBank is also introducedsubject to a capital conservation buffer, requiring banking organizationswhich respectively requires the Corporation and the Bank to
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 5




hold a buffer of common equity Tier 1 capital above the minimum risk-based capital requirements. The minimum capital conservation bufferrequirements in 2018 was 1.875% and will increaseorder to 2.5% for 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking organizations with a common equity Tier 1 ratio above the minimum but below the conservation buffer may faceavoid constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based oncompensation. The minimum capital buffer requirement for advanced approaches banking organizations, such as the amount of such shortfall. Basel III also introduced aCorporation and the Bank, is 2.5%.
A “countercyclical buffer” of 0% to 2.5% of a banking organization’s total risk-weighted assets for advanced approaches banking organizations, such as the Corporation, which is intended to createalso a component of the capital buffer for such banking organizations during expansionary economic phases in order to protect against declines in asset prices if credit conditions weaken.adequacy framework. In general, the amount of the countercyclical capital buffer is a weighted average of the countercyclical capital buffer established in the various jurisdictions in which the banking organization has credit exposures. The U.S. countercyclical buffer is currently set at 0%, and.
As a result of the stress test results published by the Federal Reserve Board has indicated that generally it will provide a 12-month phase-in of changes toon June 25, 2020, the minimum required countercyclicalCorporation’s stress capital buffer and userequirement for the notice and comment process to communicate proposed changes to the public. Certain other jurisdictions in which the Corporation has credit exposures currently have countercyclical buffers2020 capital plan cycle was set at levels greater than 0%, slightly increasing the weighted average countercyclical2.5%. The 2020 stress capital buffer to which the Corporation is subject.became effective October 1, 2020, and results in a common equity tier 1 capital ratio minimum requirement of 7.0%.
On December 21, 2018, the Federal Reserve Board adopted a final rule that will permit banking organizations, including the Corporation and the Bank, to elect to phase-in the day-one adverse effects of implementing CECL on regulatory capital calculations over a three-year period. The final rule will take effect April 1, 2019, although CECL is not required to be implemented by public companies until 2020.
As discussed above, in April 2018, the Federal Reserve Board proposed revisions to the Basel III rules that would in part integrate the forward-looking stress test results with the non-stress capital requirements discussed in this section. If implemented, the revisions would establish revised capital requirements for large banking organizations, such as the Corporation, that are institution-specific and risk-sensitive. The April 2018 proposal would also modify several assumptions in the CCAR exercise to align them better with an institution’s expected actions under stress. Separately, the Regulatory Relief Act directed the Federal Reserve Board to revise the Basel III rules to provide relief from the supplementary leverage ratio requirement for certain funds that are deposited with a central bank. Further, in October 2018, the Federal Reserve Board proposed changes to the applicability thresholds for regulatory capital and liquidity requirements for certain large U.S. banking organizations. At the same time, the Federal Reserve Board indicated that, assuming it finalizes the proposal without further modification, the Corporation will be a Category II institution, meaning

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 9



that it will become subject to certain additional capital planning and liquidity reporting requirements. As of the date of this report, the Federal Reserve Board has not finalized the April 2018 or October 2018 proposals or proposed rules to implement the relief provided for in the Regulatory Relief Act. The Corporation cannot predict whether the April 2018 or October 2018 proposals will be finalized, whether and when the rules to implement the relief provided for in the Regulatory Relief Act will be proposed and finalized, and whether finalization of any proposal would alter the way in which the Basel III rules are applied to the Corporation and Bank.

LIQUIDITY STANDARDS
In additionNorthern Trust is subject to capital adequacy standards, Basel III introduced two quantitative liquidity standards: athe U.S. liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) requirement, which is designed to ensure that covered banking organizations including the Corporation and the Bank maintain an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets equal to their expected net cash outflow for a 30-day time horizon under a regulatorily prescribed liquidity stress scenario. As of December 31, 2020, the Corporation and the Bank were in compliance with applicable LCR requirements.
Basel III also introduced the concept of a net stable funding ratio (NSFR). The LCR is intended requirement, designed to promote the short-term resiliencemore medium- and long-term funding of the liquidity risk profileassets and activities of coveredbanking entities over a one-year time horizon. The NSFR will require certain banking organizations, improve the banking industry’s ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and economic stress, and improve the measurement and management of liquidity risk. In September 2014, the U.S. banking agencies finalized rules to implement the LCR in the United States for large banking organizations, such asincluding the Corporation and the Bank. Among other things, the finalized LCR rules require covered banking organizations, which include the Corporation and the Bank, to maintain an amount of high-quality liquid assets (HQLAs) equal to or greater than 100% of the banking organization’s total net cash outflows over a thirty-calendar-day standardized supervisory liquidity stress scenario. The LCR has been fully implemented since January 1, 2017. Northern Trust is required to calculate its LCR on a daily basis and disclose publicly certain LCR information on a quarterly basis.
The NSFR requires banking organizations to maintain a stable funding profile in relation to the composition of their assets and off-balance-sheetoff-balance sheet activities. More specifically, the NSFR requires that the ratio of available stable funding relative to the amount of required stable funding be equal to at least 100% on an ongoing basis. The Basel Committee finalized its NSFR rules in October 2014, which were to be implemented by the Federal Reserve Board as a minimum standard by January 1, 2018. The Federal Reserve Board issued a proposal on May 3, 2016 to implement the NSFR and revised aspects of that proposal in the two October 2018 proposals discussed above, but has not adopted a final rule.rule in October 2020 implementing the NSFRand the Corporation and the Bank will be required to comply with the NSFR requirement on July 1, 2021.
The enhanced prudential standards (discussed above)imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act, as amended by the Regulatory Reform Act, specify certain required liquidity risk management practices to be followed by coveredfor large U.S. banks and bank holding companies includingand banks. The Federal Reserve Board’s October 2019 final tailoring rule targets certain aspects of these requirements based on banking organizations’ business model and risk profile, as delineated into four risk-based categories. The Corporation, a Category II institution under the Corporation andfinal tailoring rule, is subject to the Bank. These practices include an independent review of liquidity risk management, and the establishment of cash flow projections, a contingency funding plan, and liquidity risk limits. The Corporation’s Board of Directors (Board) also is required to establish and maintain a liquidity buffer of unencumbered HQLAs based on the results of internal liquidity stress testing. This liquidity buffer must be tailored to Northern Trust’s business risks and is in addition to other liquidity requirements, such as the LCR and NSFR discussed above. The enhanced prudential standards also establish requirements and responsibilities for the Board of Directors and its Business Risk Committee with respect to liquidity risk management. The enhanced prudential standards require Northern Trust to engage inmonthly liquidity stress testing, under multiple stress scenarios and time horizons tailored to its specific products and risk profile. The Board of Directors has approved a liquidity management policy establishing the principles and guidelines for the Corporation to govern the processes and activities for the management of its liquidity position. Among other matters, this policy includes limits and thresholds related to the enhanced prudential standards liquidity buffer, and the LCR.daily liquidity reporting requirements.


PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION
The FDIC Improvement Act of 1991 requires the appropriate federalFederal banking regulatorregulators are required to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to a depository institution if that institution does not meet certain capital adequacy standards. While these regulations apply only to banks, such as the Bank, the Federal Reserve Board isstandards, and are also authorized to take appropriate action against a parent bank holding company such as the Corporation, based on theof an under-capitalized status of any banking subsidiary. In certain instances, the Corporation wouldcould be required to guarantee the performance of thea capital restoration plan for its under-capitalized banking subsidiary.the Bank if it were under-capitalized.
As noted above, the Federal Reserve Board has issued proposed rules to implement certain “early remediation requirements” applicable to U.S. bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more as required under Section 166 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Similar to prompt corrective action, the early remediation requirements would require institutions subject to the proposal to take increasingly stringent corrective measures as the institution’s financial condition deteriorates. No final rule implementing Section 166 has been issued as of the date of this report, and the thresholds at which such a final rule would apply have been raised by the Regulatory Relief Act and may be subject to further rulemaking by the Federal Reserve Board.


RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES AND INSIDERS
As an insured depository institution, theThe Bank is subject to restrictions which governgoverning transactions between FDIC-insured banksit and any affiliated entity, whether that entity isentities, including the Corporation, as the Bank’s parent holding company, a holding company affiliate of the Bank or a subsidiary of the Bank. Regulation W restrictions apply to certain “covered

10   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




transactions,” including extensions of credit, issuance of guarantees, investments or asset purchases. In general, these restrictions require that any extensions of credit must be secured fully with qualifying collateral and are limited, as to any one of the Corporation or such nonbankits affiliates, to 10% of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus, and, as to the Corporation and all such nonbank affiliates in the aggregate, to 20% of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus. These restrictions are also applied to transactions between the Bank and its financial subsidiaries. Furthermore, theseThese transactions must be on terms and conditions that are, or in good faith would be, offered to nonaffiliated companies (i.e., at arm’s length).
The Dodd-Frank Act generally enhancedon terms not less favorable to the restrictions on transactions with affiliates under Sections 23A and 23BBank than market terms). Further, extensions of the Federal Reserve Act, including an expansion of the definition of “covered transactions” to include credit exposures related to derivatives, repurchase agreements and securities lending arrangements, and an increase in the amount of time for which collateral requirements regarding covered credit transactions must be satisfied. The definition of “affiliate” was expandedsecured fully with qualifying collateral and are limited to include any investment fund to which the Corporation or an affiliate serves as an investment adviser. The ability of the Federal Reserve Board to grant exemptions from these restrictions was also narrowed, including by requiring coordination with other bank regulators. In addition, the provision in Section 23A that had permitted the Bank to engage in covered transactions with a financial subsidiary of the Bank in an amount greater than 10% (but less than 20%) of the Bank’s capital and surplus has been eliminated.
The restrictions on loansfor transactions with a single affiliate and to directors, executive officers, principal stockholders and their related interests (collectively referred to herein as “insiders”) contained in20% of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O apply to all federally insured institutions, including the Bank. These restrictions include, among others, limits on loans to one borrower and conditions that must be met before such a loan can be made. There is also an aggregate limitation on all loans (including credit exposures related to derivatives, repurchase agreements and securities lending arrangements) to insiders and their related interests. These loans cannot exceed the institution’s total unimpairedBank’s capital and surplus and the FDIC may determine that a lesser amount is appropriate. Insiders are subject to enforcement actions for knowingly accepting loans in violation of applicable restrictions. The Dodd-Frank Act enhanced these restrictions and also imposed restrictions on the purchase or sale of assets between banking institutions and insiders.transactions with all affiliates.


ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, ANTI-TERRORISM LEGISLATION, AND OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL
The Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and implemented in the regulation of the federal banking regulators and Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, which containscontain anti-money laundering (AML) and financial transparency provisions and requires implementation of regulations applicable to financial services companies, including, but not limited to, standardsrequirements for conducting due diligence, verifying client and beneficial owner identification, and monitoring client transactions and detecting and reporting suspicious activities. AML laws outside the U.S.United States contain similar requirements. The Corporation and its subsidiaries have implemented policies, procedures and internal controls that are designed to comply with all applicable AML laws and regulations. Compliance with applicable AML laws and related
Various legal requirements is a common area of review for financial regulators, and the Corporation’s and its subsidiaries’ failure to comply with these requirements could result in fines, penalties, lawsuits, regulatory sanctions or difficulties in obtaining approvals, restrictions on their business activities or harm to their reputation.
In May 2016, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a new rule that requires certain financial institutions, including the Bank, to obtain beneficial ownership information related to certain legal entity clients. Compliance with the new rule has been required since May 2018. As part of its AML compliance program,prohibit Northern Trust has implemented,entities from engaging in business in or with certain jurisdictions and continues to maintain, processesparties, such as organizations and controls to comply with the new beneficial ownership information collection rule.
countries suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts. The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is responsible for requiring that U.S. entities do not engage in business with certain prohibited parties and jurisdictions, as defined by various executive orders and Acts of Congress. OFAC publishes lists of persons, organizations and countries suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts, trafficking in narcotics, proliferating weapons of mass destruction or representing other threats to national security, known as Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons.these prohibited parties. If the Corporation or the Bank finds a sanctioned name or jurisdiction on any transaction or account, the Corporation or the Bank must reject or block such account or transaction as required, and notify the appropriate authorities.
Failure to comply with these requirements could result in fines, penalties, lawsuits, regulatory sanctions or difficulties in obtaining approvals, restrictions on their business activities or harm to reputation. Many other countries have imposed



6 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




similar laws and regulations that apply to the Corporation’s non-U.S. offices. The Corporation has established policies and procedures to comply with these laws and the related regulations in all relevant jurisdictions.


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 11



regulations.
DEPOSIT INSURANCE AND ASSESSMENTS
The Bank accepts deposits, and eligible deposits have the benefit of FDIC insurance up to the applicable limit. The current limit, for FDIC insurance for deposit accountswhich is currently $250,000 for each depositor account. Under the FDIA, insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the insured depository institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition, to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, orderlaws, regulations, or condition imposed byorders from a bank’s federal regulatory agency. The FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund is funded by assessments on insured depository institutions. Certain liquid assets are excluded from the deposit insurance assessment base of custody banks that satisfy certain institutional eligibility criteria. This has the effect of reducing the amount of deposit insurance fund insurance premiums due frompayable by custody banks. In March 2016, the FDIC finalizedThe Bank qualifies as a surcharge assessment on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more, such as the Bank, in connection with the Dodd-Frank Act requirement to increase the Deposit Insurance Fund’s minimum reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35% without increasing the assessments of small insured depository institutions. This surcharge assessment remained in effect until September 30, 2018, when the reserve ratio reached 1.35%. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law, placing new restrictions on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more, such as the Bank, with respect to the deduction of all or a portion of all of their deposit insurance assessment payments as business expensescustody bank for federal taxation purposes. As a result of this tax law change, the Bank is no longer able to deduct its FDIC deposit insurance assessment payments.purpose.


FIDUCIARY RULE
The U.S. Department of Labor issued a final regulation and related prohibited transaction exemptions, effective June 2017, which significantly expanded the concept of “investment advice” for the purpose of determining fiduciary status to employee benefits plans, plan participants, and individual retirement account (IRA) owners under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). However, in June 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the final regulation, and related prohibited transaction exemptions, and thus they are no longer in effect. In anticipation of the Fifth Circuit’s action, the Department of Labor issued guidance in May 2018 stating that, pending the issuance of further regulations, exemptions or administrative guidance, it will not pursue prohibited transaction claims against investment advice fiduciaries who are working diligently and in good faith to comply with the “impartial conduct standards” set forth in the vacated regulation for transactions that would have been exempted by the vacated prohibited transaction exemptions. The Corporation is operating under the Department of Labor’s May 2018 guidance pending further developments.

COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT
The Bank is subject to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). The CRA and the regulations issued thereunder are intended to encourage banks to help meet the credit needs of their service areas, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operations of the banks. These regulations also provide for regulatory assessment of a bank’s record in meeting the needs of its service area when considering applications to establish branches, merger applications, and applications to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of another bank. In October 2012, the Federal Reserve Board, the federal regulator responsible for monitoring the Bank’s CRA compliance, approved the designation of the Bank as a “wholesale bank.” As a result of this designation, theThe Bank fulfills its CRA obligations by making qualified investments for the purposes of community development, rather than retail CRA loans. Federal banking agencies are required to make public the rating of a bank’s performance under the CRA.development. The Bank received an “outstanding” CRA rating from the Federal Reserve Board in its most recent CRA examination. In September 2020, the Federal Reserve Board issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking regarding potential changes to the regulations issued under the CRA, but has not taken further action to date.


PRIVACY AND SECURITY
Federal law establishes a minimum federal standard of financial privacy by, among other provisions, requiring financial institutions to adopt and disclose privacy policies with respect to consumer information, and setting forth certain limitations on disclosure to third parties of consumer information. Regulations adopted under the federal law setinformation, setting standards for protecting the security, confidentiality and integrity of client information, and requirerequiring notice of data breaches to regulators, and in some cases, to clients.
certain circumstances. Most states, the European Union (EU) and other non-U.S. jurisdictions also have adopted their own statutes and/or regulations concerning financialdata privacy and security and requiring notification of data breaches. For example, a new European data protection framework - framework—the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - was adopted on April 8, 2016, and became effective in all European Economic Area (EEA) member states on May 25, 2018. GDPR is designed to harmonize data privacy laws across the EEA, to protect EEA citizens’ data privacy and to reshape the way organizations across the region approach data privacy. GDPR has extraterritorial effect as its scope includes all data controllers and processors outside the EEA whose processing activities relate to the offering of goods or services to, or monitoring the behavior of, EEA individuals. Organizations that violate certain provisions of GDPR could be fined up to €20 million or 4% of their annual global turnover (i.e., revenue)worldwide revenue for the preceding fiscal year, whichever is greater.

12   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




California and became effective January 1, 2020,and then enforceable on July 1, 2020. The CCPA substantially increased the rights of California residents to understand how their personal data is collected and used by commercial businesses. The CCPA includes a private right of action (permitting lawsuits to be brought by private individuals instead of the state Attorney General or other government actor for breaches), and contemplates civil penalties of up to $2,500 for each violation and up to $7,500 for each intentional violation. On November 3, 2020, the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (CPRA), which amends and supersedes portions of the CCPA, was approved by a majority of California voters. Among other changes, the CPRA will establish the California Privacy Protection Agency to administer, implement, and enforce the CCPA and CPRA. The CPRA is expected to be fully operative beginning in 2023, and will apply to personal information collected on or after January 1, 2022. However, the CCPA, including its implementing regulations, remains in effect until the CPRA is operative.
The Corporation has adopted and disseminated privacy policies and communicates required information relating to financial privacy and data security in accordance with applicable law.


CONSUMER LAWS AND REGULATIONS
The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries are subject to certain consumerfederal and state laws and regulations that are designed to protect consumers in transactions with banks. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with clients and monitor account activity when taking deposits, making loans to or engaging in other types of transactions with such clients. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could lead to substantial penalties, operating restrictions and reputational damage to the financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act established an independentConsumer laws and regulations are enforced by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) within the Federal Reserve System. The CFPB was tasked with establishing and implementing rulesother federal and regulations under certain federal consumer protection laws with respect to the conduct of providers of certain consumer financial products and services. The creation of the CFPB by the Dodd-Frank Act has led to enhanced enforcement of consumer financial protection laws.state regulators.


NON-U.S. REGULATION
Northern Trust is subject to the laws and regulatory authorities of the jurisdictions in which its non-U.S. branches and subsidiaries operate. For example, branches and subsidiaries conducting banking and asset servicing businesses in the United Kingdom (UK) are authorized to do so pursuant to the UK Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. They are authorized by the PRAPrudential Regulation Authority (PRA) or the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and regulated by the FCA and, in some instances, also the PRA. The PRA and FCA exercise broad supervisory and disciplinary powers that
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 7




include the power to revoke temporarily or permanently authorization to conduct a regulated business upon breach of the relevant regulations, suspend registered employees, and impose censures and fines on both regulated businesses and their regulated employees.
Northern Trust’s European branches and subsidiaries are subject to the laws and regulatory authorities of the EU and the member states in which they are domiciled.domiciledor the UK. For example, with the establishment of Northern Trust Global Services SE as an EU-domiciled credit institution in Luxembourg in connection with the Corporation’s planning related to the UK’s departure from the EU, commonly referred to as “Brexit,” such entity is subject to the prudential supervision of the European Central Bank and the CSSF. Moreover, Northern Trust’s non-Europeannon-EU branches and subsidiaries conducting financial services activities also may be within the scope of thesethe laws of the EU, given that some EU laws apply to the wider EEA, which includes not only all EU member states but also the non-EU member states Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, and because of increasing extraterritorial effect of EuropeanEU legislation.
Effective January 31, 2020, the UK is no longer a member of the EU. EU legislation as it applied to the UK on December 31, 2020 is now a part of UK domestic legislation, under the control of the UK’s Parliament and Assemblies.
The following items provide a brief description of certain recently implemented and in-progress regulatory changes in the EU and the UK relevant to the Corporation and its subsidiaries, in addition to the BRRD and GDPR discussed under “The Dodd-Frank Act, as Amended—Resolution Planning” and “Privacy and Security,” respectively, above.


Revised Capital Requirements Directive and revised Capital Requirements Regulation. The EU Capital Requirements Directive of June 26, 2013 (CRD) and the EU Capital Requirements Regulation of June 26, 2013 (CRR) govern the legal framework for banking regulation in the EU, including, among other things, own fund requirements. On November 23, 2016, the EUEuropean Commission (Commission) published a proposal for a revision of the CRD (CRD V) and the CRR (CRR II). Formal adoption ofEU member states were required to implement the requirements in the CRD V andinto their national law by December 28, 2020, with most of the measures to apply from December 29, 2020. Most of the CRR II by the EU Parliament and European Council has not yet occurred.will apply from June 28, 2021. Further, CRD V and CRR II currently contain mandates for the European Banking Authority (EBA) to produce a number of regulatory technical standards (RTS) and implementing technical standards (ITS), which remain under development.
Central Securities Depositories Regulation.On September 17, 2014, the EU Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR) entered into force (subject to a number of transitional provisions). The CSDR aims principally to ensure that transactions between buyers and sellers of dematerialized securities are settled in a safe and timely manner by introducing common securities settlement standards across the EU. CSDR requires several “Level 2” (or implementing) measures in order for its provisions to take effect fully. A number of these “Level 2” measures were published in 2017. Most recently, onOn September 13, 2018, the EU Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 supplementing the CSDR with regard to technical standards on settlement discipline was published in the EU’s Official Journal. The Delegated Regulation, which is expected to enter into force on September 14, 2020, sets out measures to prevent and address failed settlements and encourage settlement discipline by monitoring failed settlements, collecting and distributing cash penalties for failed settlements, and specifyingEU subsequently approved the operational detailsdelay of the buy-in process.CSDR until February 1, 2022. Since then, the Commission’s 2021 work program and its 2020 Capital Markets Union Action Plan announced an intention to bring forward a legislative proposal which would include simplifying the CSDR and to make it more proportionate and less burdensome for stakeholders. In December 2020, the Commission published a Consultation Paper which seeks stakeholder input into its legislative proposals to ensure the overall objectives of CSDR are fulfilled in a more proportionate, efficient and effective manner.
Securities Financing Transactions and Reuse of Collateral Regulation. On November 25, 2015, the EU adopted a regulation on securities financing transactions and reuse of collateral (SFTR) as part of its approach to addressing shadow banking. The regulation includes provisions for enhanced transparency and reporting of securities financing transactions. The SFTR entered into force on January 12, 2016, subject to certain transitional provisions. SFTR requires adoption of certain “Level 2” measures which are beingwere finalized by relevant authorities.in 2019. The reporting obligations under the SFTR have been phased in from April 11, 2020, with the final phase commencing on January 11, 2021.
UK Criminal Finances Act. On September 30, 2017, the UK Criminal Finances Act (CFA) entered into force. The CFA has extra-territorial effect, introducing certain new corporate criminal offenses in circumstances where a corporate entity or partnership (a “relevant body”)relevant body) fails to prevent an “associated person” (broadly meaning an employee, agent or

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 13



person who performs services for or on behalf of the relevant body) from criminally facilitating the evasion of tax, whether the tax evaded is owed (i) in the United KingdomUK or (ii) in a foreign country if the relevant body has a nexus, or any conduct constituting part of the foreign tax evasion facilitation offenceoffense takes place, in the United Kingdom.UK. These corporate offenses are strict liability offenses, such that in circumstances where an associated person of a relevant body criminally facilitates the evasion of tax and such relevant body has failed to prevent the associated person from committing such criminal facilitation of tax evasion, the relevant body will itself be guilty of a criminal offense carrying unlimited fines, unless it can show that it put in place reasonable prevention procedures (or by showing that it was not reasonable in all the circumstances to expect the relevant body to have any prevention procedures in place).
Benchmarks Regulation.On January 1, 2018, the EU Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) became applicable in all EU member states, subject to certain transitional provisions. The principal objectives of the BMR are to restore investor



8 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




confidence in the accuracy, robustness and integrity of indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds, and the benchmark-setting process itself. The BMR aims to achieve these objectives by ensuring that benchmarks are not subject to conflicts of interest, are used appropriately, and reflect the actual market or economic reality they are intended to measure. On July 24, 2020, the Commission adopted a legislative proposal (COM (2020) 337 final) (2020/0154 (COD)) for a regulation amending the BMR regarding designation of replacement benchmarks where certain widely-used benchmarks have ceased, including the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The proposed regulation would provide for a statutory replacement rate to be available by the time a benchmark ceases. The proposed regulation is working its way through the European Parliament and the Council of the EU and is expected to be adopted by such institutions the day following its publication in the EU’s Official Journal.
MarketSustainable Finance Disclosure Regulations. On December 29, 2019, the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulations (SFDR) entered into force. SFDR aims to prevent “greenwashing” (conveying a misleading or false impression a product is more environmentally favorable than it actually is) by requiring disclosure of how sustainability risks and environmental, societal and governance (ESG) factors are part of the investment and business processes of asset managers. Mandatory disclosures are required to be published at product and manager levels in Financial Instruments Directive.a variety of ways, including on websites, in pre-contractual documents (e.g. prospectuses) and in annual reports. Certain significant provisions apply from March 10, 2021.
Taxonomy Regulation. On January 3, 2018,July 12, 2020, Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation) entered into force. The Taxonomy Regulations are part of the recastEU’s recent measures designed to encourage environmentally sustainable investment decision making and introduce a technical framework to ascertain how sustainable an economic activity is. The Taxonomy Regulations apply to financial market participants including Market in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) became applicable(MiFID) firms, Undertakings for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) management companies, and alternative investment fund managers, and will require them to investment servicesmake further pre-contractual and activities inperiodic disclosures. The Commission has delayed the EU. MiFID II, together with the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR I), repealed and recast the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2004/39/EC) (MiFID). Going forward, MiFID II and MiFIR I form the EU legal framework governing the requirements applicable to investment firms, trading venues, data reporting service providers and third-country firms providing investment services or activities in the EU.
Money Market Funds Regulation.On June 30, 2017, an EU regulation on money market funds (MMFR) with a viewapplication of making money market funds more resistant to crises and market turbulence was published. Subject to certain transitional provisions, the MMFR became applicable on July 21, 2018 for new money market funds and January 21, 2019 for existing money market funds. It will impose detailed rules relating to the investment policies, risk management and other operational aspects of such funds. Further “Level 2” regulations containingmeasures and it is expected that the technical implementation of the MMFR were published in 2018. Technical guidelinesdate will be delayed to clarify how to comply with certain reporting obligations under MMFR remain under development.January 2022.
European Deposit Insurance Scheme. On October 11, 2017, the EU Commission announced that it aimsaimed to complete all parts of the European Banking Union by 2018. This will require, among other things,The banking union is in place and operational except for the creation of a single European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS), applying. The EDIS will apply to deposit guarantee schemes (DGSs) in EU member states participating in the single supervisory mechanism (SSM) and credit institutions in those member states. The EDIS will not directly affect member states that are not participating in the SSM, such as the United Kingdom, meaning that the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), the UK DGS, will not be subject to the EDIS. The EU Council and Parliament continue to consider the legislative proposal for the EDIS regulation, which was published by the EU Commission in November 2015. The EU Commission proposed changes to its approach to the EDIS in its October 2017 communication on completing the banking union but to date has not yet published any revisions to the text of the EDIS regulation to reflect these changes. The communication also urged the European Parliament and European Council to adopt these measures quickly to complete the banking union however this remains outstanding.
Fifth EU Money Laundering Directive. On July 9, 2018, the Fifth EU Money Laundering Directive (MLD5) entered into force. MLD5 mustwas required to be transposed into local law by EU member states by January 10, 2020 and introduces the following key changes to the current EU AML regime: (i) EU member states must ensure that registers of ultimate beneficial owners of companies and other legal entities become accessible to the general public; (ii) the current AML regime is extended to additional service providers, such as electronic wallet providers, virtual currency exchange service providers, and art dealers, and further specifications regarding the scope of application of MLD5 with respect to tax advisors and estate agents are provided; (iii) the threshold for identifying holders of prepaid cards is lowered to €150; and (iv) EU member states will be required to implement enhanced due diligence measures to monitor suspicious transactions involving high-risk countries more strictly.

Shareholder Rights Directive. On May 17, 2017, the recast Shareholder Rights Directive (EU) 2017/828 was published (SRD II). Member states of the EU were required to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive by June 10, 2019. SRD was designed to establish requirements in relation to the exercise of shareholder rights and, recognizing that shares are often held through complex chains of intermediaries, SRD II is designed to improve mechanisms for the identification of shareholders by companies, as well as improve the transmission of information along the chain of intermediaries to facilitate the exercise of shareholder rights. Non-EU intermediaries are required to comply with the requirements if they provide services with respect to shares of companies that have their registered office in the EU. The Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1212 of September 3, 2018 set out minimum requirements for implementing SRD II, which have applied from September 3, 2020.
Depositary Books & Records. Following the European Securities and Markets Authority’s opinion on asset segregation and application of depositary delegation rules to central securities depositories published on July 20, 2017, and entered into force on April 1, 2020, changes were introduced by two EU regulations modifying the existing Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) and UCITS Level 2 Regulations: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 2018/1618 relating to the safe-keeping duties of depositaries of alternative investment funds and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 2018/1619 relating to the safe-keeping duties of depositaries of UCITS. The changes aim to
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 9




better define asset segregation requirements and to add additional safeguards, primarily focusing on information flow between the depositary and any third party to whom safe-keeping functions have been delegated. The key changes (i) impact the frequency of reconciliations between the depositary’s internal accounts and records and those of any third party in the custody chain, (ii) require the depositary to maintain an independent record separate from the record maintained by the third party, and (iii) increase due diligence obligations where custody of assets is delegated to third parties outside of the EU. The changes impact Northern Trust’s subsidiaries providing depositary services to European-domiciled fund clients.

In addition to the above, the Bank’s and the Corporation’s subsidiary banks located outside the United States are subject to regulatory capital requirements in the jurisdictions in which they operate. As of December 31, 2018,2020, each of our non-U.S. banking subsidiaries had capital ratios above their specified minimum requirements.


StaffHuman Capital Management
Northern Trust recognizes that our employees are critical to our success, which includes meeting clients’ needs and supporting our communities. We take our search for, and retention of, top talent seriously. To attract and retain talent, we manage programs to develop a diverse pipeline of future leaders and help employees advance their careers. The discussion below outlines Northern Trust’s human capital objectives, which include talent management, compensation, and diversity, equity and inclusion.

EMPLOYEES
Northern Trust employed approximately 18,80020,900 full-time equivalent staff members as of December 31, 2018.2020. The regional breakout of our workforce is 46% North America, 35% Asia Pacific, and 19% Europe, Middle East, and Africa.



TALENT ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT, AND MANAGEMENT
Our employees are critical to our success, and represent one of our biggest assets. We pride ourselves in attracting strong talent and have identified development of diverse talent as one of our top corporate strategic priorities. Our focus on work/life balance, diversity, and career mobility also contribute to our employer brand.
Sourcing and Recruitment.We target our talent identification, sourcing methods, and recruiting strategies to specific locations using several channels: job boards, colleges, professional networks, associations and online social networks. We base hiring decisions on a variety of factors including relevant experience, educational background, diversity, past accomplishments, professional licensing, and strong evidence of integrity and ethical behavior.
Onboarding. Northern Trust is committed to helping all new hires succeed. New employees begin their onboarding journey with a comprehensive learning roadmap that orients them to our company story, business, and culture. Orientation programs also augment the onboarding experience by providing global, regional, and/or local information along with networking activities to help connect new hires to each other and other colleagues.
Learning and Development. An integrated partnership between our enterprise-wide and functional learning and development teams ensure we deliver holistic training solutions. Through our online learning portal, all employees can access a curated portfolio of professional and custom training solutions specific to managers, top talent, and client-servicing staff. Our Future Focused Skills offerings prepare employees to serve our clients in a digital economy. Many of our programs are interactive, include peer networking, and offer direct access to expert facilitators. Training is offered in self-paced, mobile, virtual and instructor-led formats.
Talent Cultivation and Review.Northern Trust is committed to identifying and developing a deep pipeline of diverse, top talent at all levels across the globe to meet our evolving business needs. Annually, managers conduct talent assessments, and business and regional leadership teams hold talent reviews focused on specific topics, such as workforce needs, diversity, top talent, readiness for promotion, internal movement, and succession plans. Robust talent review meetings are held with our senior management and our Board of Directors each year.
Performance Management. Northern Trust’s annual performance management process includes goal setting, a mid-year review process, multi-rater feedback, and a year-end review. Priorities are set by our Chief Executive Officer and applied to each business, department, team and individual. Managers are encouraged to provide regular feedback and coaching to drive performance and results.
Engagement and Recognition. Building an inclusive, connected and engaged employee culture is essential. We invite all employees to provide management with anonymous feedback about their everyday experiences at work through an annual Employee Engagement Survey. Survey results are thoroughly evaluated to identify strengths, progress, and opportunities. If warranted, actions are identified and taken to further strengthen employee engagement. We also foster an “attitude of gratitude” through our online Celebrate Great recognition platform that allows employees to recognize one another for everyday contributions.

TOTAL REWARDS
Our compensation and benefit programs are designed to be market competitive and positioned around the median of the local market, enabling us to attract and retain talent needed to deliver on Northern Trust’s strategy.



14   201810 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation



Northern Trust’s base salary programs enable us to attract and retain talent by providing a competitive level of fixed pay reflecting each employee’s position, experience, qualifications and tenure. Additionally, all employees are eligible for incentive compensation to reward performance that delivers superior team or individual results. Incentive compensation is linked to both financial and non-financial performance criteria, including risk considerations, as determined by our Board of Directors and senior management. Select senior leaders and individual contributors may receive a percentage of their incentive in Northern Trust stock to encourage retention of key talent and to align rewards with company performance.

Employee Benefits. While the exact composition of the employee benefit package varies by country, our benefit programs are designed to be locally competitive, to meet the needs of our employees and their families, and to reflect cultural values of the organization. Typical programs include retirement benefits, health care benefits, paid time off, income protection benefits such as disability and life insurance, leaves of absence, and access to our Employee Assistance Program. In recent years, we have expanded our focus on employee well-being by providing: additional programs and resources to improve wellness, manage stress, build resiliency, and be attuned to mental health issues; access to flexible or voluntary benefits; and enhancements to various parental leave offerings.

DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION (DE&I)
Northern Trust embraces diversity and recognizes the strength it brings to our employees, clients, shareholders, and local communities. We are committed to building an inclusive culture in which all individuals are welcomed, respected, supported, and valued so that they can fully participate in, and contribute to, our success.
Embedding DE&I.Our DE&I vision is embedded at all levels of our organization, with women and ethnic minorities representing half of our executive officers and more than half of our Board of Directors. Our Board, through its Corporate Governance Committee, also engages in active oversight of our DE&I strategies, programs, and principles. Our Head of Corporate Social Responsibility and Global Diversity, Equity and Inclusion serves as an Executive Vice President, and reports directly to our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The following table presents further detail with respect to the gender and ethnic diversity of our Board of Directors and executive officers.
TABLE 2: BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS REPRESENTATION

DECEMBER 31, 2020
FEMALEMALEWHITEBLACKHISPANICASIAN
Board of Directors23%77%61%23%8%8%
Executive Officers33%67%83%17%—%—%
Progress and Accountability.Tracking and measuring our DE&I efforts is key to a successful strategy. We utilize a global DE&I dashboard to track the organization’s progress and integrate these metrics as part of our overall corporate strategy and goals. To drive accountability for increasing diversity representation across the organization, we measure representation in relation to our hiring, retention and promotion practices. Each business unit evaluates this data, and acts as needed, to improve overall diversity within their organization. Our executive leaders report their progress through the DE&I Executive Council co-chaired by our Chief Executive Officer and our Head of Corporate Social Responsibility and Global Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Our Global Executive DE&I Council is responsible for providing strategic oversight and defining and driving accountability on the global DE&I priorities.

Available Information
Through the Corporation’s website at www.northerntrust.com, the Corporation makes available free of charge its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all other reports and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after it files such material with, or furnishes such material to, the SEC. The contents of the Corporation’s website, the website of the SEC or any other website referenced herein are not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Statistical Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies
The following statistical disclosures, included in the “Supplemental Item – Selected Statistical and Supplemental Financial Data” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are incorporated herein by reference.
Average Consolidated Balance Sheets with Analysis of Net Interest Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Changes in Net Interest Income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Remaining Maturity and Average Yield of Debt Securities Held to Maturity and Available for Sale as of December 31, 2018.
Remaining Maturity of Selected Loans and Leases as of December 31, 2018.
Distribution of Non-U.S. Loans by Type as of December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Allowance for Credit Losses Relating to Non-U.S. Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Analysis of Allowance for Credit Losses for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Average Deposits by Type as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Distribution of Non-U.S. Deposits by Type as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Remaining Maturity of Time Deposits $100,000 or More as of December 31, 2018.
Average Rates Paid on Interest-Related Deposits by Type for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Selected Average Assets and Liabilities Attributable to Non-U.S. Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Percent of Non-U.S.-Related Average Assets and Liabilities to Total Consolidated Average Assets for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Non-U.S. Outstandings as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Purchased Funds as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

The following statistical disclosures, included under Items 6, 7 and 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 6, “Selected Financial Data,” includes the Corporation’s consolidated return on average common equity, return on average assets, dividend payout ratio and ratio of average equity to average assets.
The “Securities Portfolio” table (Item 7) provides the book values of investments in obligations of the U.S. government, states and political subdivisions, and other held to maturity and available for sale debt securities as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
The “Composition of Loan Portfolio” table (Item 7) provides loans and leases by type as of December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
The “Nonperforming Assets” table (Item 7) provides information about the Corporation’s nonaccrual, past due and restructured loans receivable as of December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
The “Commercial Real Estate Loans” table (Item 7) provides details of loan concentrations as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
The “Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses” table (Item 7) provides a breakdown of the allowance for credit losses by loan class and illustrates the proportion of each loan class to total loans.
The “Allowance and Provision for Credit Losses” section (Item 7) provides a discussion of the factors which influenced management’s judgment in determining the provision for credit losses.
Note 6, “Loans and Leases,” (Item 8) provides the Corporation’s forgone interest income on nonaccrual loans, as well as a description of the nature of non-U.S. loans as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” (Item 8) provides a discussion of Northern Trust’s policy for placing loans on non-accrual status.
Further discussion of Northern Trust’s management of credit risk with respect to the provision and allowance for credit losses is provided in the following information that is incorporated herein by reference to the notes to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”


20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 1511

Table of Contents




Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”:
H. Loans and Leases.
I. Allowance for Credit Losses.
L. Other Real Estate Owned (OREO).
Note 6, “Loans and Leases.”
Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses.”
Note 8, “Concentrations of Credit Risk.”
Note 28, “Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments.”


16   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




ITEM 1A - RISK FACTORS
In the normal course of our business activities, we are exposed to a variety of risks. The following discussion sets forth the risk factors that we have identified as being most significant to Northern Trust. Although we discuss these risk factors primarily in the context of their potential effects on our business, financial condition or results of operations, you should understand that these effects can have further negative implications such as: reducing the price of our common stock and other securities; reducing our capital, which can have regulatory and other consequences; affecting the confidence that clients, and counterparties and/or applicable regulators have in us, with a resulting negative effect on our ability to conduct and grow our businesses; and reducing the attractiveness of our securities to rating agencies and potential purchasers, which may affect adversely our ability to raise capital and secure other funding or the cost at which we are able to do so. Further, additional risks beyond those discussed below, elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in other of our reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC also could affect us adversely. We cannot assure you that the risk factors herein or elsewhere in our other reports address all potential risks that we may face.
These risk factors also serve to describe factors which may cause our results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements included herein or in other documents or statements that make reference to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements and other factors that may affect future results are discussed under “Forward-Looking Statements” included in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,Operations.

COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Risks
Our business, results of operations, and financial condition generally have been, and will continue to be, adversely affected by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and governmental and societal responses thereto, have had a severe impact on global economic and market conditions, including heightened volatility in financial markets; global supply chain disruptions; and the institution of social distancing and shelter-in-place requirements that have resulted in temporary closures of many businesses, lost revenues, and increased unemployment.
These conditions have impacted—and/or may in the future impact—our business, results of operations, and financial condition negatively, including through lower net interest income resulting from lower interest rates; increased provisions for credit losses; lower revenue from certain of our fee-based businesses; impairments on the securities we hold; and decreased demand for certain of our products and services. Additionally, our liquidity and regulatory capital could be adversely impacted by volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets; volatility in foreign exchange rates; deposit flows; and client draws on lines of credit. Our business operations may also be disrupted if significant portions of our workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, or other restrictions in connection with the pandemic. Further, work-from-home and other modified business practices may introduce additional operational risks, including resiliency, cybersecurity, and execution risks, which may result in inefficiencies or delays, and may affect our ability to, or the manner in which we, conduct our business activities.
While governmental authorities have taken unprecedented measures to provide economic assistance to individual households and businesses, stabilize the markets, and support economic growth, the ultimate success of these measures is unknown and they may not be sufficient to mitigate fully the negative impact of the ongoing pandemic. Further, some measures may have a negative impact on our business, while our participation in other measures could result in reputational harm, litigation, or regulatory and government actions, proceedings, or penalties.
The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact our business, results of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of the outbreak, its severity, the actions to contain the virus or treat its impact, the distribution, acceptance and efficacy of a vaccine, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. The ongoing pandemic may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.section entitled “Risk Factors” and any subsequent filings with the SEC.


Market Risks
We are dependent on fee-based business for a majority of our revenues, which may be affected adversely by market volatility, a downturn in economic conditions, underperformance and/or negative trends in investment preferences.
Our principal operational focus is on fee-based business, which is distinct from commercial banking institutions that earn most of their revenues from loans and other traditional interest-generating products and services. Fees for many of our products and services are based on the market value of assets under management, custody or administration; the volume of transactions processed; securities lending volume and spreads; and fees for other services rendered, all of which may be impacted negatively by market volatility, a downturn in economic conditions, underperformance and/or negative trends in investment preferences. For example, downturns in equity markets and decreases in the value of debt-related investments



12 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




resulting from market disruption, illiquidity or other factors historically have reduced the valuations of the assets we manage or service for others, which generally impacted our earnings negatively. Market volatility and/or weak economic conditions also may affect wealth creation, investment preferences, trading activities, and savings patterns, which impact demand for certain products and services that we provide.
Our earnings also may be affected by poor investment returns or changes in investment preferences driven by factors beyond market volatility or weak economic conditions. For example, poor absolute or relative investment performance in funds or client accounts that we manage or in investment products that we design or provide that is due to underperformance relative to our competitors or benchmarks could result in declines in the market values of portfolios that we manage and/or administer and may affect our ability to retain existing assets and to attract new clients or additional assets from existing clients. Further, broader changes in investment preferences that lead to less investment in mutual funds or other collective funds, such as the recent shift in investor preference to lower fee products, could impact our earnings negatively.


Changes in interest rates can affect our earnings negatively.
The direction and level of interest rates are important factors in our earnings. AlthoughIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve Board has raised the target Federal Funds rate range in recent years,further reduced interest rates, which generally remainhad already been low relative to historical levels. Low interest rate environments haveThis has had, in the past, and may continue to have, in the future, a negative impact on our net interest margin, which is the difference between what we earn on our assets and the interest rates we pay for deposits and other sources of funding. Low interest rateLow-interest-rate environments also have historically had a negative impact on our fees earned on certain of our products. For example, in the past, we have from time to time waived certain fees associated with money market mutual funds due to the low level of short-term interest rate levels. While we did not implement any such fee waivers in 2018, we may do so in the future if short-term interest rate levels decline.rates. Low net interest margins and fee waivers each negatively impact our earnings.
Conversely, in some circumstances, a continued rise in interest rates also may affect us negatively. For example, we may be impacted negatively if such an increase were to cause: market volatility and downturns in equity markets, resulting in a decrease in the valuations of the assets we manage or service for others, which generally impact our earnings negatively; our clients to transfer funds into investments with higher rates of return, resulting in decreased deposit levels and higher fund or account redemptions; our borrowers to experience difficulties in making higher interest payments, resulting in increased credit costs, provisions for loan and lease losses and charge-offs; reduced bond and fixed income fund liquidity, resulting in lower

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 17



performance, yieldyields and fees; a decline in the value of securities held in our portfolio of investment securities, resulting in decreased levels of capital and liquidity; or higher funding costs.
Further, although we have policies and procedures in place to assess and mitigate potential impacts of interest rate risks, if our assumptions about any number of variables are incorrect, these policies and procedures to mitigate risk may be ineffective, which could impact earnings negatively.
Please see “Market Risk” in the “Risk Management” section included in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion of interest rate and market risks we face.


Changes in the monetary, trade and other policies of the various regulatory authorities, or central banks, of the United States, non-U.S. governments and international agencies may reduce our earnings and affect our growth prospects negatively.
The monetary, trade and other policies of U.S. and international governments, agencies and regulatory bodies have a significant impact on interest rateseconomic conditions and overall financial market performance. For example, the Federal Reserve Board regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States, and its policies determine in large part the level of interest rates and our cost of funds for lending and investing, which are important factors in our earnings. The actions of the Federal Reserve Board or other regulatory authorities also may reduce the value of financial instruments we hold. Further, their policies can affect our borrowers by increasing interest rates or making sources of funding less available, which may increase the risk that borrowers fail to repay their loans from us. Changes in monetary, trade and other governmental policies are beyond our control and can be difficult to predict, and we cannot determine the ultimate effect that any such changes would have upon our business, financial condition or results of operations.


The ultimate impact on us of the United Kingdom’s referendum regarding whether to remain part of the European
Union remains uncertain.
In June 2016, United Kingdom (UK) voters approved a departurewithdrawal from the European Union (EU), commonly referredremains uncertain.
The UK ceased to as “Brexit.” In March 2017, the UK deliveredbe a formal notice of withdrawal to the EU. The termsmember state of the withdrawal are subject to a negotiationEU on January 31, 2020, and the transition period expected to last at least two years fromprovided for in the withdrawal notification date and such negotiation period likely will be followedagreement entered by additional negotiations between the EU and the UK concerning future relations between the parties. On December 8, 2018, the UK and the EU jointly publishedended on December 31, 2020. In December 2020, the terms ofUK and the EU agreed on a withdrawaltrade and cooperation agreement which to date has failed to generatethat will apply provisionally after the supportend of the transition period until it is ratified by the parties to the agreement. On December 30, 2020, the UK Parliament,passed legislation giving effect to the trade and cooperation agreement, with the EU expected to formally adopt the agreement in early 2021. While the trade and cooperation agreement covers the general objectives and framework of the relationship between the UK and the EU, it generallydoes not address the regulation of financial services. Instead, the parties adopted a non-binding statementdeclaration of their intention to agree by March 2021 upon a Memorandum of Understanding establishing a framework for regulatory cooperation on future relations. Thefinancial services.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 13




Consequently, the ultimate impact of Brexit on the Corporation and the Bank remains uncertain and will depend on the final terms of withdrawal and the post-Brexit relationships that remain to be negotiated between the UK and other EU nations. Further, such impact may be more pronounced ifnations, particularly in the withdrawal were to occur without a transition agreement in place between the UK and the EU.area of financial services. Brexit has contributed, and may continue to contribute, to market volatility, particularly the valuation of the Euro and British pound, and could have significant adverse effects on our businesses, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, certain of our EU operations are conducted through subsidiaries located in the UK, leveraging the EU financial services “passport,” which permits activities throughout the single EU market without needing to obtain local authorizations. In conjunction with our Brexit-related preparations, and to mitigate the potential risk that our UK subsidiaries will be unable to retain their EU financial services “passports,” we have taken steps to implementimplemented certain changes to our organizational structure, including the establishment of an EU-domiciled credit institution in Luxembourg. We have incurred, and may in the future continue to incur, additional costs associated with such measures andwhile unforeseen political, regulatory, or other developments related to Brexit, or operational issues associated with the organizational restructuring related thereto, also may result in additional costs and disruption to our UK and EU banking business.businesses.


Uncertainty about the financial stability of various regions or countries across the globe, including the risk of defaults on sovereign debt and related stresses on financial markets, could have a significant adverse effect on our earnings.
Risks and concerns about the financial stability of various regions or countries across the globe could have a detrimental impact on economic and market conditions in these or other markets across the world. Foreign market and economic disruptions have affected, and may continue toin the future affect, consumer confidence levels and spending, personal bankruptcy rates, levels of incurrence of and default on consumer debt, and home prices. Economic challenges faced in various foreign markets, including negative interest rates in some jurisdictions, or lack of confidence in the financial markets may adversely affect certain portions of our business, financial condition, and any disruptions related to such challenges, may impact our earnings negatively.results of operations.


Declines in the value of securities held in our investment portfolio can affect us negatively.
Our investment securities portfolio represents a greater proportion, and our loan and lease portfolios represent a smaller proportion, of our total consolidated assets in comparison to many other financial institutions. The value of securities available for sale and held to maturity within our investment portfolio, which is generally determined based upon market

18   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




values available from third-party sources, may fluctuate as a result of market volatility and economic or financial market conditions. For example, the global financial crisis of 2007-08 and resultant period of economic turmoil and financial market disruption affected negatively the liquidity and pricing of securities, generally, and asset-backed and auction rate securities, in particular. Declines in the value of securities held in our investment portfolio negatively impact our levels of capital and liquidity. Further, to the extent that we experience unrealized losses in our portfolio of investment securities from declines in securities values that management determines to be other than temporary, the book value of those securities will be adjusted to their estimated recovery value and we will recognize a charge to earnings in the quarter during which we make that determination. Although we have policies and procedures in place to assess and mitigate potential impacts of market risks, including hedging-related strategies, those policies and procedures are inherently limited because they cannot anticipate the existence or future development of currently unanticipated or unknown risks. Accordingly, we could suffer adverse effects as a result of our failure to anticipate and manage these risks properly.


Volatility levels and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may affect our earnings.
We provide foreign exchange services to our clients, primarily in connection with our global custody business. Foreign currency volatility influences our foreign exchange trading income as does the level of client activity. Foreign currency volatility and changes in client activity may result in reduced foreign exchange trading income. Fluctuations in exchange rates may raise the potential for losses resulting from foreign currency trading positions, where aggregate obligations to purchase and sell a currency other than the U.S. dollar do not offset each other or offset each other in different time periods. We also are exposed to non-trading foreign currency risk as a result of our holdings of non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities, investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries, and future non-U.S. dollar denominated revenue and expense.
We have policies and procedures in place to assess and mitigate potential impacts of foreign exchange risks, including hedging-related strategies. Any failure or circumvention of our procedures to mitigate risk may impact earnings negatively. Please see “Market Risk” in the “Risk Management” section included in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion of market risks we face.


Changes in a number of particular market conditions can affect our earnings negatively.
In past periods, reductions in the volatility of currency-trading markets, the level of cross-border investing activity, and the demand for borrowing securities or willingness to lend such securities have affected our earnings from activities such as foreign exchange trading and securities lending negatively. If these conditions occur in the future, our earnings from these activities may be affected negatively. In a few of our businesses, such as securities lending, our fee is calculated as a percentage of our client’sclients’ earnings, such that market and other factors that reduce our clients’ earnings from investments or trading activities also reduce our revenues. For example, the global financial crisis of 2007-08 and resultant period of economic turmoil and financial market disruption produced losses in some securities lending programs, reduced borrower demand and led some clients to withdraw from these programs. A return of these conditions in the future could result in additional withdrawals and decreased activity, which could impact our earnings negatively.





14 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




Operational Risks
Many types of operational risks can affect our earnings negatively.
We regularly assess and monitor operational risk in our businesses. Despite our efforts to assess and monitor operational risk, our risk management program may not be effective in all cases. Factors that can impact operations and expose us to risks varying in size, scale and scope include:
failures of technological systems or breaches of security measures, including, but not limited to, those resulting from computer viruses or cyber-attacks;
human errors or omissions, including failures to comply with applicable laws or corporate policies and procedures;
theft, fraud or misappropriation of assets, whether arising from the intentional actions of internal personnel or external third parties;
defects or interruptions in computer or communications systems;
breakdowns in processes, over-reliance on manual processes, which are inherently more prone to error than automated processes, breakdowns in internal controls or failures of the systems and facilities that support our operations;
unsuccessful or difficult implementation of computer systems upgrades;
defects in product design or delivery;
difficulty in accurately pricing assets, which can be aggravated by market volatility and illiquidity and lack of reliable pricing from third-party vendors;

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 19



negative developments in relationships with key counterparties, third-party vendors, employees or associates in our day-to-day operations; and
external events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, such as natural disasters, pandemics, computer viruses, geopolitical events, political unrest, natural disasters or acts of terrorism.


While we have in place many controls and business continuity plans designed to address many of these factors, these plans may not operate successfully to mitigate these risks effectively. We also may fail to identify or fully understand the implications and risks associated with changes in the financial markets or our businesses—particularly as we expand our geographic footprint, product pipeline and client types—types evolve—and consequently fail to enhance our controls and business continuity plans to address those changes in an adequate or timely fashion. If our controls and business continuity plans do not address the factors noted above and operate to mitigate the associated risks successfully, such factors may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, an important aspect of managing our operational risk is creating a risk culture in which all employees fully understand that there is risk in every aspect of our business and the importance of managing risk as it relates to their job functions. We continue to enhance our risk management program to support our risk culture, ensuring that it is sustainable and appropriate for our role as a major financial institution. Nonetheless, if we fail to provide the appropriate environment that sensitizes all of our employees to managing risk, our business could be impacted adversely.


Failures of our technological systems or breaches of our security measures, including, but not limited to, those resulting from cyber-attacks, may result in losses.
Any failure, interruption or breach in the security of our systems could severely disrupt our operations. Our systems involve the use of clients’ and our proprietary and confidential information, and security breaches, including cyber-attacks, could expose us to a risk of theft, loss or other misappropriation of this information. Our security measures may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, failure of our controls with respect to granting access to our systems, malfeasance or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our or our clients’ proprietary and confidential information, resulting in the theft, loss, destruction, gathering, monitoring, or other misappropriation of this information. Regulators globally are also introducing the potential for greater monetary fines on institutions that suffer from breaches leading to the theft, loss or other misappropriation of such information. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which was adopted byMost states, the EU in 2016 and became effective in May 2018, establishes new requirements regarding the handlingother non-U.S. jurisdictions also have adopted their own statutes and/or regulations concerning data privacy and security and requiring notification of personal information. Noncompliance with the GDPR may result in monetary penalties of up to 4% of worldwide revenue. The GDPRdata breaches. These and other changes in laws or regulations associated with the enhanced protection of personal and other types of information could greatly increase the size of potential fines related to the protection of such information.
Information security risks for large financial institutions like us are significant in part because of the evolving proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet, mobile devices, and cloud technologies to conduct financial transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of hackers, terrorists, organized crime and other external parties, including foreign state actors. If we fail to continue to upgrade our technology infrastructure to ensure effective cyber-securityinformation security relative to the type, size and complexity of our operations, we could become more vulnerable to cyber-attack and, consequently, subject to significant regulatory penalties. Additionally, our computer, communications, data processing, networks, backup, business continuity or other operating, information or technology systems, including those that we outsource to other providers, may fail to operate properly or become disabled, overloaded or damaged as a result of a
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 15




number of factors, including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, which could have a negative effect on our ability to conduct our business activities.
The third parties with which we do business also are susceptible to the foregoing risks (including regarding the third parties with which they are similarly interconnected or on which they otherwise rely), and our or their business operations and activities may therefore be affected adversely, perhaps materially, by failures, terminations, errors or malfeasance by, or attacks or constraints on, one or more financial, technology, infrastructure or government institutions or intermediaries with whom we or they are interconnected or conduct business. In addition, our clients often use their own devices, such as computers, smart phones and tablets, to manage their accounts, which may heighten the risk of system failures, interruptions or security breaches.
In recent years, several financial services firms suffered successful cyber-attacks launched both domestically and from abroad, resulting in the disruption of services to clients, loss or misappropriation of sensitive or private information, and reputational harm. Although we have not to our knowledge suffered a material breach of our systems, weWe and our clients have been, and expect to continue to be, subject to a wide variety of cyber-attacks and threats, including computer viruses, ransomware and other malicious code, distributed denial of service attacks, and phishing attacks, and it is possible that we could suffer material losses resulting from a material breach in the future.breach. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques, to implement adequate preventative measures, or to address them until they are discovered. We expectIn addition, successful cyber-attacks may persist for an extended period of time before being detected. Because any investigation of an information security incident would be inherently unpredictable, the extent of a particular information security incident and the path of investigating the incident may not be immediately clear. It may take a significant amount of time before such an investigation can be completed and full and reliable information about the incident is known. While such an investigation is ongoing, we may not necessarily know the extent of the harm or how best to continueremediate it, certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated, and communication to face increasing cyber-threats,

20   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




including computer viruses, ransomwarethe public, regulators, clients and other malicious code, distributed denialstakeholders may be inaccurate, any or all of service attacks, phishing attacks,which could further increase the costs and consequences of an information security breaches or employee or contractor error or malfeasance that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of our, our clients’ or other parties’ confidential, personal, proprietary or other information or otherwise disrupt, compromise or damage our or our clients’ or other parties’ business assets, operations and activities. Our status as a global financial institution and the nature of our client base may enhance the risk that we are targeted by such cyber-threats. If a breach of our security occurs, weincident.
We could be the subject of legal claims or proceedings related to security incidents, including regulatory investigations and actions,actions. Further, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed, our reputation could suffer and we could lose clients in conjunction with security incidents, each of which could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. A breach of our security also may affect adversely our ability to effect transactions, service our clients, manage our exposure to risk or expand our business. An event that results in the loss of information also may require us to reconstruct lost data or reimburse clients for data and credit monitoring services, which could be costly and have a negative impact on our business and reputation.
Further, even if not directed at us, attacks on financial or other institutions important to the overall functioning of the financial system or on our counterparties could affect, directly or indirectly, aspects of our business.


Errors, breakdowns in controls or other mistakes in the provision of services to clients or in carrying out transactions for our own account can subject us to liability, result in losses or have a negative effect on our earnings in other ways.
In our asset servicing, investment management, fiduciary administration and other business activities, we effect or process transactions for clients and for ourselves that involve very large amounts of money. Failure to manage or mitigate operational risks properly can have adverse consequences, and increased volatility in the financial markets may increase the magnitude of resulting losses. For example, in the third quarter of 2020 we incurred a $43.4 million charge related to a corporate action processing error. Given the high volume of transactions we process, errors that affect earnings may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and corrected.


Our dependence on technology, and the need to update frequently our technology infrastructure, exposes us to risks that also can result in losses.
Our businesses depend on information technology infrastructure, both internal and external, to record and process, among other things, a large volume of increasingly complex transactions and other data, in many currencies, on a daily basis, across numerous and diverse markets and jurisdictions. Due to our dependence on technology and the important role it plays in our business operations, we must constantly improve and update our information technology infrastructure. Upgrading, replacing, and modernizing these systems can require significant resources and often involves implementation, integration and security risks that could cause financial, reputational and operational harm. Failure to ensure adequate review and consideration of critical business and regulatory issues prior to and during the introduction and deployment of key technological systems or failure to align operational capabilities adequately with evolving client commitments and expectations may have a negative impact on our results of operations. The failure to respond properly to, and invest in, changes and advancements in technology could limit our ability to attract and retain clients, prevent us from offering products and services comparable to those offered by our competitors, inhibit our ability to meet regulatory requirements or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our operations.




16 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation





The systems and models we employ to analyze, monitor and mitigate risks, as well as for other business purposes, are
inherently limited, may be not be effective in all cases and, in any case, cannot eliminate all risks that we face.
We use various systems and models in analyzing and monitoring several risk categories, as well as for other business purposes. However, these systems and models are inherently limited because they involve techniques and judgments that cannot anticipate every economic and financial outcome in the markets in which we operate, nor can they anticipate the specifics and timing of such outcomes. Further, these systems and models may fail to quantify accurately the magnitude of the risks we face. Our measurement methodologies rely on many assumptions and historical analyses and correlations. These assumptions may be incorrect, and the historical correlations on which we rely may not continue to be relevant. Consequently, the measurements that we make may not adequately capture or express the true risk profiles of our businesses or provide accurate data for other business purposes, each of which ultimately could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Errors in the underlying model or model assumptions, or inadequate model assumptions, could result in unanticipated and adverse consequences, including material loss or noncompliance with regulatory requirements or expectations.


A failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We regularly review and update our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 21



assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system will be met. Any failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we identify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or are otherwise required to restate our financial statements, we could be required to implement expensive and time-consuming remedial measures and could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports. In addition, there are risks that individuals, either employees or contractors, consciously circumvent established control mechanisms by, for example, exceeding trading or investment management limitations, or committing fraud.


Failure of any of our third-party vendors to perform can result in losses.
Third-party vendors provide key components of our business operations such as data processing, recording and monitoring transactions, online banking interfaces and services, and network access. Our use of third-party vendors exposes us to the risk that such vendors may not comply with their servicing and other contractual obligations to us, including with respect to indemnification and information security, and to the risk that we may not satisfy applicable regulatory responsibilities regarding the management and oversight of third parties and outsourcing providers. While we have established risk management processes and continuity plans, any disruptions in service from a key vendor for any reason or poor performance of services could have a negative effect on our ability to deliver products and services to our clients and conduct our business. Replacing these third-party vendors or performing the tasks they perform for ourselves could create significant delay and expense.


We are subject to certain risks inherent in operating globally which may affect our business adversely.
In conducting our U.S. and non-U.S. business, we are subject to risks of loss from various unfavorable political, economic, legal or other developments, including social or political instability, changes in governmental policies or policies of central banks, expropriation, nationalization, confiscation of assets, price controls, capital controls, exchange controls, unfavorable tax rates and tax court rulings and changes in laws and regulations. Less mature and often less regulated business and investment environments heighten these risks in various emerging markets, in which we have been expanding our business activities.markets. Our non-U.S. operations accounted for 34%28% of our revenue in 2018.2020. Our non-U.S. businesses are subject to extensive regulation by various non-U.S. regulators, including governments, securities exchanges, central banks and other regulatory bodies in the jurisdictions in which those businesses operate. In many countries, the laws and regulations applicable to the financial services industry are uncertain and evolving and may be applied with extra scrutiny to foreign companies. Moreover, the regulatory and supervisory standards and expectations in one jurisdiction may not conform with standards or expectations in other jurisdictions. Even within a particular jurisdiction, the standards and expectations of multiple supervisory agencies exercising authority over our affairs may not be harmonized fully. Accordingly, it may be difficult for us to determine the exact requirements of local laws in every market or manage our relationships with multiple regulators in various jurisdictions. Our inability to remain in compliance with local laws in a particular market and manage our relationships with regulators could have an adverse effect not only on our businesses in that market but also on our reputation generally. The failure to mitigate properly such risks or the failure of our operating infrastructure to support such international activities could result in operational failures and regulatory fines or sanctions, which could affect our business and results of operations adversely.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 17




We actively strive to optimize our geographic footprint. This optimization may occur by establishing operations in lower-cost locations or by outsourcing to third-party vendors in various jurisdictions. These efforts expose us to the risk that we may not maintain service quality, control or effective management within these operations. In addition, we are exposed to the relevant macroeconomic, political and similar risks generally involved in doing business in those jurisdictions. The increased elements of risk that arise from conducting certain operating processes in some jurisdictions could lead to an increase in reputational risk. During periods of transition, greater operational risk and client concern exist with respect to maintaining a high level of service delivery.
In addition, we are subject in our global operations to rules and regulations relating to corrupt and illegal payments, and money laundering, and laws relating to doing business with certain individuals, groups and countries, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and the UK Bribery Act, and economic sanctions and embargo programs administered by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control and similar agencies worldwide. While we have invested and continue to invest significant resources in training and in compliance monitoring, the geographic diversity of our operations, employees, clients and customers, as well as the vendors and other third parties with whom we deal, presents the risk that we may be found in violation of such rules, regulations, laws or programs and any such violation could subject us to significant penalties or affect our reputation adversely.


22   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation





Failure to control our costs and expenses adequately could affect our earnings negatively.
Our success in controlling the costs and expenses of our business operations also impacts operating results. Through various parts of our business strategy, we aim to produce efficiencies in operations that help reduce and control costs and expenses, including the costs of losses associated with operating risks attributable to servicing and managing financial assets. Failure to control these and other costs could affect our earnings negatively and reduce our competitive position. In October 2017, we announced our “Value for Spend” expense management initiative, through which we intend to realize $250 million in expense run-rate savings by 2020 through improved organizational alignment, process optimization and strategic sourcing. Although we have made progress toward achieving this level of expense run-rate savings, we cannot provide assurance that the overall “Value for Spend” initiative will be successful, nor can we predict its overall effect on our financial condition or results of operations.


Acts of terrorism,Pandemics, natural disasters, pandemicsglobal climate change, acts of terrorism and global conflicts may have a negative impact on our business and operations.
ActsPandemics, natural disasters, global climate change, acts of terrorism, natural disasters, pandemics, global conflicts or other similar catastrophic events couldhave in the past, and may in the future have, a negative impact on our business and operations. While we have in place business continuity plans, such events couldmay still damage our facilities, disrupt or delay the normal operations of our business (including communications and technology), result in harm to or cause travel limitations on our employees, and have a similar impact on our clients, suppliers, third-party vendors and counterparties. These events also could impact the purchase of our products and servicesus negatively to the extent that those acts or conflictsthey result in reduced capital markets activity, lower asset price levels, or disruptions in general economic activity in the United States or abroad, or in financial market settlement functions. In addition, war, terror attacks, political unrest, global conflicts, national and global efforts to combat terrorism and other potential military activities and outbreaks of hostilitiesthese or similar events may impact economic growth negatively, which could have an adverse effect on our business and operations, and may have other adverse effects on us in ways that we are unable to predict. Please see “COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Risks” in this “Risk Factors” section for a description of risks associated with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


Credit Risks
Failure to evaluate accurately the prospects for repayment when we extend credit or maintain an adequate allowance for credit losses can result in losses or the need to make additional provisions for credit losses, both of which reduce our earnings.
We evaluate extensions of credit before we make them and then provide for credit risks based on our assessment of the credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio, including undrawn credit commitments. This process requires us to make difficult and complex judgments. Challenges associated with our credit risk assessments include identifying the proper factors to be used in assessments and accurately estimating the impacts of those factors. Allowances that prove to be inadequate may require us to realize increased provisions for credit losses or write down the value of certain assets on our balance sheet, which in turn would affect earnings negatively.


Market volatility and/or weak economic conditions can result in losses or the need for additional provisions for credit losses, both of which reduce our earnings.
Credit risk levels and our earnings also can be affected by market volatility and/or weakness in the economy in general and in the particular locales in which we extend credit, a deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit. Adverse changes in the financial performance or condition of our borrowers resulting from market volatility and/or weakened economic conditions could impact the borrowers’ abilities to repay outstanding loans, which could in turn impact our financial condition and results of operations negatively.






201818 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation23

Table of Contents




The failure or perceived weakness of any of our significant counterparties could expose us to loss.
The financial markets are characterized by extensive interconnections among financial institutions, including banks, broker/dealers, collective investment funds and insurance companies. As a result of these interconnections, we and many of our clients have counterparty exposure to other financial institutions. This counterparty exposure presents risks to us and to our clients because the failure or perceived weakness of any of our counterparties has the potential to expose us to risk of loss. Instability in the financial markets has resulted historically in some financial institutions becoming less creditworthy. During such periods of instability, we are exposed to increased counterparty risks, both as principal and in our capacity as agent for our clients. Changes in market perception of the financial strength of particular financial institutions can occur rapidly, are often based upon a variety of factors and can be difficult to predict. In addition, the criteria for and manner of governmental support of financial institutions and other economically important sectors remain uncertain. Further, the consolidation of financial serviceservices firms and the failures of other financial institutions has in the past increased, and may in the future increase, the concentration of our counterparty risk. These risks are heightened by the fact that our operating model relies on the use of unaffiliated sub-custodians to a greater degree than certain of our competitors that have banking operations in more jurisdictions than we do. We are not able to mitigate all of our and our clients’ counterparty credit risk. If a significant individual counterparty defaults on an obligation to us, we could incur financial losses that have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Changes in the method pursuant to which the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)LIBOR or other interest rate benchmarks are determined could adversely impact our business and results of operations.
Many financial markets currently rely on interbank offered rates (each, an IBOR)“IBOR”) as mutually agreed upon reference rates serving as the basis for the pricing and valuation of assets, trading positions, loans and other financial transactions. Following historical concerns about attempted manipulation of IBOR levels, as well as a potential lack of liquidity in the underlying activity that contributes to an IBOR setting, globalGlobal regulators have signaled interest in replacing existing IBOR rates with alternative reference rates. While there are multiple IBORs, LIBOR is the most widely used interest rate benchmark in the world and serves as the reference rate for our floating-rate funding, certain of the products that we own or offer, various lending and securities transactions in which we are involved, and many derivatives that we use to manage our or our clients’ risk. On November 30, 2020, ICE Benchmark Administration (“IBA”), the administrator of U.S. Dollar LIBOR has been the subject of recent national(“USD LIBOR”) and international regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. The United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the process for establishing LIBOR,other IBORs, announced in July 2017 that, following required consultations, (i) it intends to stop persuading or compelling bankscease publication of 1-week and 2-month USD LIBOR at the end of 2021 and (ii) subject to submit rates forcompliance with applicable regulations, including as to representativeness, it does not intend to cease publication of the calculation ofremaining USD LIBOR tenors until June 30, 2023. Globally, financial market participants have begun to the administrator oftransition away from LIBOR after 2021. Such announcement indicates that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot be guaranteed after 2021. At this time, it is not possibleand other IBORs to predict the effect that these developments, any discontinuance, modification or other reforms to LIBOR or any other interest rate benchmarks, or the establishment of alternative reference rates, may have onand following the IBA’s announcement, U.S. regulators, including the Federal Reserve Board, issued statements encouraging banks to stop entering into new USD LIBOR or other interest rate benchmarks.contracts “as soon as practicable,” and by no later than December 31, 2021. Any change in the availability or calculation of LIBOR or other interest rate benchmarks may affect adversely the cost or availability of floating-rate funding; the yield on loans or securities held by us; the amounts received and paid on derivative instruments we have entered into; the value of loans, securities, or derivative instruments held by us or our clients, which, in the case of assets held by our clients, could also negatively impact the amount of fees we earn in relation to such assets; the trading market for securities based on LIBOR or other benchmarks; the terms of new loans being made using different or modified reference rates; or our ability to use derivative instruments to manage risk effectively. While we are working to facilitate an orderly transition from LIBOR to alternative interest rate benchmarks for us and our clients, there continues to be uncertainty regarding the effect that these developments, any discontinuance, modification or other reforms to LIBOR or any other interest rate benchmarks, or the establishment of alternative reference rates may have on LIBOR or other interest rate benchmarks. Further, the potential transition away from the use of LIBOR or other interest rate benchmarks, or uncertainty related to any such potential transition, may cause us to recognize additional costs, or experience operational disruptions or result in client disputes or litigation, which may negatively impact our business, financial condition or results of operations.


Liquidity Risks
If we do not manage our liquidity effectively, our business could suffer.
Liquidity is essential for the operation of our business. Market conditions, unforeseen outflows of funds or other events could have a negative effect on our level or cost of funding, affecting our ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, meet contractual obligations, and fund new business transactions at a reasonable cost and in a timely manner. If our access to stable and low-cost sources of funding, such as customer deposits, areis reduced, we may need to use alternative funding, which could be more expensive or of limited availability. Further evolution in the regulatory requirements relating to liquidity and risk management also may impact us negatively. Additional regulations may impose more stringent liquidity requirements for large financial institutions, including the Corporation and the Bank. Given the overlap and complex interactions of these regulations with other regulatory changes, the full impact of the adopted and proposed regulations remains uncertain until their full implementation. For more information on these
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 19




regulations and other regulatory changes, see “Supervision and Regulation-LiquidityRegulation—Liquidity Standards” in Item 1, “Business,“Business. of

24   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents


this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any substantial, unexpected or prolonged changes in the level or cost of liquidity could affect our business adversely.


If the Bank is unable to supply the Corporation with funds over time, the Corporation could be unable to meet its various obligations.
The Corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank and the Corporation’s other subsidiaries. The Corporation relies on dividends paid to it by the Bank to meet its obligations and to pay dividends to stockholders of the Corporation. There are various legal limitations on the extent to which the Bank and the Corporation’s other subsidiaries can supply funds to the Corporation by dividend or otherwise. Dividend payments by the Bank to the Corporation in the future will require continued generation of earnings by the Bank and could require regulatory approval under certain circumstances. For more information on dividend restrictions, see “Supervision and Regulation-PaymentRegulation—Payment of Dividends” in Item 1, “Business,“Business. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


We may need to raise additional capital in the future, which may not be available to us or may only be available on unfavorable terms.
We may need to raise additional capital to provide sufficient resources to meet our business needs and commitments, to accommodate the transaction and cash management needs of our clients, to maintain our credit ratings in response to regulatory changes, including capital rules, or for other purposes. However, our ability to access the capital markets, if needed, will depend on a number of factors, including the state of the financial markets. Rising interest rates, disruptions in financial markets, negative perceptions of our business or our financial strength, or other factors may impact our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, on terms acceptable to us. Any diminished ability to raise additional capital, if needed, could subject us to liability, restrict our ability to grow, require us to take actions that would affect our earnings negatively or otherwise affect our business and our ability to implement our business plan, capital plan and strategic goals adversely.


Any downgrades in our credit ratings, or an actual or perceived reduction in our financial strength, could affect our borrowing costs, capital costs and liquidity adversely.
Rating agencies publish credit ratings and outlooks on our creditworthiness and that of our obligations or securities, including long-term debt, short-term borrowings, preferred stock and other securities. Our credit ratings are subject to ongoing review by the rating agencies and thus may change from time to time based on a number of factors, including our own financial strength, performance, prospects and operations as well as factors not under our control, such as rating-agency-specific criteria or frameworks for our industry or certain security types, which are subject to revision from time to time, and conditions affecting the financial services industry generally.
Downgrades in our credit ratings may affect our borrowing costs, our capital costs and our ability to raise capital and, in turn, our liquidity adversely. A failure to maintain an acceptable credit rating also may preclude us from being competitive in certain products. Additionally, our counterparties, as well as our clients, rely on our financial strength and stability and evaluate the risks of doing business with us. If we experience diminished financial strength or stability, actual or perceived, a decline in our stock price or a reduced credit rating, our counterparties may be less willing to enter into transactions, secured or unsecured, with us, our clients may reduce or place limits on the level of services we provide them or seek other service providers, or our prospective clients may select other service providers, all of which may have other adverse effects on our business.
The risk that we may be perceived as less creditworthy relative to other market participants is higher in a market environment in which the consolidation, and in some instances failure, of financial institutions, including major global financial institutions, could result in a smaller number of larger counterparties and competitors. If our counterparties perceive us to be a less viable counterparty, our ability to enter into financial transactions on terms acceptable to us or our clients, on our or our clients’ behalf, will be compromised materially. If our clients reduce their deposits with us or select other service providers for all or a portion of the services we provide to them, our revenues will decrease accordingly.


Our success with large, complex clients requires substantial liquidity.
A significant portion of our business involves providing certain services to large, complex clients, which, by their nature, require substantial liquidity. Our failure to manage successfully the liquidity and balance sheet issues attendant to this portion of our business may have a negative impact on our ability to meet client needs and grow.






201820 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation25

Table of Contents




Regulatory and Legal Risks
Failure to comply with regulations can result in penalties and regulatory constraints that restrict our ability to grow or even conduct our business, or that reduce earnings.
Virtually every aspect of our business around the world is regulated, generally by governmental agencies that have broad supervisory powers and the ability to impose sanctions. In the United States, the Corporation, the Bank and many of the Corporation’s other subsidiaries are regulated heavily by bank regulatory agencies at the federal and state levels. These regulations cover a variety of matters, ranging fromincluding required capital levels, to prohibited activities. Theyactivities, and privacy and data protection. Some of these requirements are directed specifically at protecting depositors of the Bank, the federal deposit insurance fund and the banking system as a whole, not our stockholders or other security holders. The Corporation and its subsidiaries also are regulated heavily by bank, securities and other regulators globally and subject to evolving laws and regulations regarding privacy and data protection, including the GDPR. Regulatory violations or the failure to meet formal or informal commitments made to regulators could generate penalties, require corrective actions that increase costs of conducting business, result in limitations on our ability to conduct business, restrict our ability to expand or impact our reputation adversely. Failure to obtain necessary approvals from regulatory agencies on a timely basis could affect proposed business opportunities and results of operations adversely. Similarly, changes in laws or failure to comply with new requirements or with future changes in laws or regulations may impact our results of operations and financial condition negatively.

The ongoing implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act, as amended by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, may have a material effect on our operations.
The Dodd-Frank Act became law in July 2010 and has had a significant impact on the regulatory and compliance structure in which we operate. In February 2017, an executive order was issued by the President (i) establishing core principles for regulating the U.S. financial system and (ii) instructing the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury to consult with heads of the member agencies of the U.S. Financial Stability Oversight Council and to issue reports that identify laws, regulations, and policies, including those implemented under the Dodd-Frank Act, that inhibit federal regulation of the U.S. financial system in a manner consistent with the core principles. The required reports were issued in 2017 and 2018, and further action may be taken in the future regarding the reports’ recommendations. In May 2018, Congress passed, and the President signed into law, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA), containing significant amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act and requiring the Federal Reserve Board and other regulatory agencies to adopt various implementing regulations. While some of the implementing regulations have been finalized, others remain subject to further regulatory action, and there remains uncertainty surrounding the manner in which certain of the existing provisions will be implemented by the various regulatory agencies. These legislative and regulatory changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make any changes necessary to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements, and any further changes to or resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act and the EGRRCPA may impact the profitability of our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, or otherwise affect our business adversely.
Failure to address shortcomings identified by regulators in our 2015 resolution plan could result in restrictions or directives that restrict our ability to grow or even conduct our business.
Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act and implementing regulations jointly issued by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC require bank holding companies with at least $50 billion in assets, which includes the Corporation, to submit annually a resolution plan to the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC detailing the bank holding company’s plan for rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure. If the regulators jointly determine that our resolution plan is not “credible” or would not facilitate an orderly resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the Corporation could be subject to more stringent capital, leverage or liquidity requirements, restrictions on growth, activities or operations, or be required to divest certain assets or operations. On March 24, 2017, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC jointly identified certain “shortcomings” in the resolution plan submitted by the Corporation in December 2015. While the identification of shortcomings is different from a determination that the plan is not credible, the Corporation was required to address satisfactorily the identified shortcomings in the Corporation’s resolution plan submitted to the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC on December 19, 2017, with respect to which the Corporation has not yet received formal regulatory feedback. If the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC jointly decide that the Corporation’s 2017 resolution plan fails to address the identified shortcomings in a satisfactory manner, then the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC could jointly determine that the 2017 resolution plan is not credible or would not facilitate an orderly resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and could subject us to the measures described above.


26   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents



Changes by the U.S. and other governments to laws, regulations and policies involvingapplicable to the financial services industry may heighten the challenges we face and make regulatory compliance with the evolving laws and regulations applicable to banks and other financial services companies more difficult and costly.
In the past several years, variousVarious regulatory bodies have demonstrated heightened enforcement scrutiny of financial institutions through many regulatory initiatives, including anti-money-laundering rules, anti-bribery laws, and loan-modification requirements.initiatives. These and other regulatory requirementsinitiatives have increased compliance costs and regulatory risks and may lead to financial and reputational damage in the event of a compliance violation. While we have programs in place, including policies, training and various forms of monitoring, designed to ensure compliance with legislative and regulatory requirements, these programs and policies may not always protect us from conduct by individual employees. Governments may take further actions to change significantly the way financial institutions are regulated, either through new legislation, new regulations, new applications of existing regulations or a combination of all of these methods. We cannot currently predict the impact, if any, of these changes to our business. Additionally, governments and regulators may take actions that increase intervention in the normal operation of our businesses and the businesses of our competitors in the financial services industry, and likely would involve additional legislative and regulatory requirements imposed on banks and other financial services companies. Any such actions could increase compliance costs and regulatory risks, lead to financial and reputational damage in the event of a violation, affect our ability to compete successfully, and also may impact the nature and level of competition in the industry in unpredictable ways. The full scope and impact of possible legislative or regulatory changes and the extent of regulatory activity is uncertain and difficult to predict.

For example, we are unable to predict what, if any, changes to the laws and regulations applicable to the financial services industry may be enacted by the new U.S. Congress in conjunction with the new U.S. presidential administration under unified party control, and what the impact of any such changes will be upon our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Moreover, the turnover of the U.S. presidential administration is expected to result in certain changes in the leadership and senior staffs of the federal banking agencies which are likely to impact the rulemaking, supervision, examination and enforcement priorities and policies of such agencies, the potential impacts of which, if any, we cannot predict at this time.

We may be impacted adversely by claims or litigation, including claims or litigation relating to our fiduciary responsibilities.
Our businesses involve the risk that clients or others may sue us, claiming that we have failed to perform under a contract or otherwise failed to carry out a duty perceived to be owed to them. Our trust, custody and investment management businesses are particularly subject to this risk. This risk is heightened when we act as a fiduciary for our clients and may be further heightened during periods when credit, equity or other financial markets are deteriorating in value or are particularly volatile, or when clients or investors are experiencing losses. In addition, as a publicly-held company, we are subjectregulators, tax authorities and courts have increasingly sought to the risk of claims under the federal securities laws, and volatility in our stock price and those of otherhold financial institutions increases this risk. liable for the misconduct of their clients where such regulators and courts have determined that the financial institution should have detected that the client was engaged in wrongdoing, even though the financial institution had no direct knowledge of the wrongdoing.
Claims made or actions brought against us, whether founded or unfounded, may result in injunctions, settlements, damages, fines or penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations or require changes to our business. Even if we defend ourselves successfully, the cost of litigation is often substantial, and public reports regarding claims made against us may cause damage to our reputation among existing and prospective clients or negatively impact the confidence of counterparties, rating agencies and stockholders, consequently affecting our earnings negatively.


2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 21




We may be impacted adversely by regulatory enforcement matters.
In the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to various regulatory,supervisory, governmental and enforcement inquiries, examinations, investigations and subpoenas. These may be directed generally to participants in the businesses in which we are involved or may be directed specifically at us. In conjunction with both supervisory and enforcement matters, we may face claims for disgorgement,limits on our ability to conduct or expand our business, be required to implement corrective actions that increase the impositioncosts of conducting business, or become subject to civil andor criminal penalties or the imposition of other remedial sanctions, any of which could result in reputational damage or otherwise have an adverse impact on us.


We may fail to set aside adequate reserves for, or otherwise underestimate our liability relating to, pending and threatened claims, with a negative effect on our earnings.
We estimate our potential liability for pending and threatened claims and record reserves when appropriate pursuant to GAAP, by evaluating the facts of particular claims under current judicial decisions and legislative and regulatory interpretations. Thisgenerally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The process is inherently subject to risk, including the risks that a judge or jury could decide a case contrary to our evaluation of the law or the facts or that a court could change or modify existing law on a particular issue important to the case. Our earnings will be adversely affected adversely to the extent thatif our reserves are not adequate.


If we fail to comply with legal standards, we could incur liability to our clients or lose clients, which could affect our earnings negatively.
Managing or servicing assets with reasonable prudence in accordance with the terms of governing documents and applicable laws is an important part of our business. Failure to comply with the terms of governing documents and applicable laws, manage adequately the risks or manage appropriately the differing interests often involved in the exercise of fiduciary responsibilities may subject us to liability or cause client dissatisfaction, which may impact negatively our earnings and growth.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 27

Table of Contents



Strategic Risks
If we do not execute strategic plans successfully, we will not grow as we have planned and our earnings growth will be impacted negatively.
Our growth depends upon successful, consistent execution of our business strategies. A failure to execute these strategies will impact growth negatively. A failure to grow organically or to integrate successfully an acquisition could have an adverse effect on our business. The challenges arising from generating organic growth or the integration of an acquired business may include preserving valuable relationships with employees, clients, suppliers and other business partners, delivering enhanced products and services, as well as combining accounting, data processing and internal control systems. To the extent we enter into transactions to acquire complementary businesses and/or technologies, we may not achieve the expected benefits of such transactions, which could result in increased costs, lowered revenues, ineffective deployment of capital, regulatory concerns, exit costs or diminished competitive position or reputation. These risks may be increased if the acquired company operates internationally or in a geographic location where we do not already have significant business operations.
Execution of our business strategies also may require certain regulatory approvals or consents, which may include approvals of the Federal Reserve Board and other domestic and non-U.S. regulatory authorities. These regulatory authorities may impose conditions on the activities or transactions contemplated by our business strategies which may impact negatively our ability to realize fully the expected benefits of certain opportunities. Further, acquisitions we announce may not be completed if we do not receive the required regulatory approvals, if regulatory approvals are significantly delayed or if other closing conditions are not satisfied.


Competition for our employees is intense, andIf we mayare not be able to attract, retain and retainmotivate key personnel.personnel, our business could be negatively affected.
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract new employees, retain and motivate our existing employees, and continue to compensate our employees competitively. Competition for the best employees in most activities in which we engage can be intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to recruit and retain key personnel. Factors that affect our ability to attract and retain talented and diverse employees include our compensation and benefits programs, our profitability and our reputation for rewarding and promoting qualified employees. Our ability to attract and retain key executives and other employees may be hindered as a result of existing and potential regulations applicable to incentive compensation and other aspects of our compensation programs. These regulations may not apply to some of our competitors and to other institutions with which we compete for talent. The unexpected loss of services of key personnel, both in businesses and corporate functions, could have a material adverse impact on our business because of their skills, knowledge of our markets, operations and clients, years of industry experience and, in some cases, the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. Similarly, the loss of key employees, either individually or as a group, could affect our clients’ perception of our abilities adversely.





22 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




We are subject to intense competition in all aspects of our businesses, which could have a negative effect on our ability to maintain satisfactory prices and grow our earnings.
We provide a broad range of financial products and services in highly competitive markets. We compete against large, well-capitalized, and geographically diverse companies that are capable of offering a wide array of financial products and services at competitive prices. In certain businesses, such as foreign exchange trading, electronic networks present a competitive challenge. Additionally, technological advances and the growth of internet-based commerce have made it possible for other types of institutions to offer a variety of products and services competitive with certain areas of our business. Many of these nontraditional service providers have fewer regulatory constraints and some have lower cost structures. The same may be said for competitors based in non-U.S. jurisdictions, where legal and regulatory environments may be more favorable than those applicable to the Corporation and the Bank as U.S.-domiciled financial institutions. These competitive pressures may have a negative effect on our earnings and ability to grow. Pricing pressures, as a result of the willingness of competitors to offer comparable or improved products or services at a lower price, also may result in a reduction in the price we can charge for our products and services, which could have, and in some cases has had, a negative effect on our ability to maintain or increase our profitability.


Damage to our reputation could have a direct and negative effect on our ability to compete, grow and generate revenue.
The failure to meet client expectations or fiduciary or other obligations, operational failures, litigation, regulatory actions or fines, the purportedactual or alleged actions of our affiliates, vendors or other third parties with which we do business, the purportedactual or alleged actions or statements of our employees or adverse publicity could materially and adversely affect our reputation as well as our ability to attract and retain clients or key employees. Damage to our reputation for delivery of a high level of service could undermine the confidence of clients and prospects in our ability to serve them and accordingly affect our earnings negatively. Damage to our reputation also could affect the confidence of rating agencies, regulators, stockholders and other

28   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents


parties in a wide range of transactions that are important to our business and the performance of our common stock. Failure to maintain our reputation ultimately would have an adverse effect on our ability to manage our balance sheet or grow our business. Actions by the financial services industry generally or by other members of or individuals in the financial services industry also could impact our reputation negatively. Further, whereas negative public opinion once was driven primarily by adverse news coverage in traditional media, the proliferation of social media channels utilized by us and third parties, as well as the personal use of social media by our employees and others, may increase the risk of negative publicity, including through the rapid dissemination of inaccurate, misleading or false information, which could harm our reputation or have other negative consequences.


We need to invest in innovation constantly, and the inability or failure to do so may affect our businesses and earnings negatively.
Our success in the competitive environment in which we operate requires consistent investment of capital and human resources in innovation, particularly in light of the current “FinTech” environment, in which financial institutions are investing significantly in evaluating new technologies, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies, and developing potentially industry-changing new products, services and industry standards. Our investment is directed at generating new products and services, and adapting existing products and services to the evolving standards and demands of the marketplace. Among other things, investing in innovation helps us maintain a mix of products and services that keeps pace with our competitors and achieve acceptable margins. Our investment also focuses on enhancing the delivery of our products and services in order to compete successfully for new clients or gain additional business from existing clients, and includes investment in technological innovation as well. Effectively identifying gaps or weaknesses in our product offerings also is important to our success. Falling behind our competition in any of these areas could affect our business opportunities, growth and earnings adversely. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with innovation efforts, including an increased risk that new and emerging technologies may expose us to increased cybersecurity and other information technology threats. We must invest significant time and resources in developing and marketing new products and services, and expected timetables for the introduction and development of new products or services may not be achieved and price and profitability targets may not be met. Further, our revenues and costs may fluctuate because new products and services generally require start-up costs while corresponding revenues take time to develop or may not develop at all.


Failure to understand or appreciate fully the risks associated with development or delivery of new product and service offerings will affect our businesses and earnings negatively.
The success of our innovation efforts depends, in part, on the successful implementation of new product and service initiatives. Not only must we keep pace with competitors in the development of these new offerings, but we must accurately price them (as well as existing products) on a risk-adjusted basis and deliver them to clients effectively. Our identification of risks arising from new products and services, both in their design and implementation, and effective
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 23




responses to those identified risks, including pricing, is key to the success of our efforts at innovation and investment in new product and service offerings.


Our success with large, complex clients requires an understanding of the market and legal, regulatory and accounting standards in various jurisdictions.
A significant portion of our business involves providing certain services to large, complex clients which require an understanding of the market and legal, regulatory and accounting standards in various jurisdictions. Any failure to understand, address or comply with those standards appropriately could affect our growth prospects or affect our reputation negatively. We identify and manage risk through our business strategies and plans and our risk management practices and controls. If we fail to identify and manage significant risks successfully, we could incur financial loss, suffer damage to our reputation that could restrict our ability to grow or conduct business profitably, or become subject to regulatory penalties or constraints that could limit some of our activities or make them significantly more expensive. In addition, our businesses and the markets in which we operate are continuously evolving. We may fail to understand fully the implications of changes in legal or regulatory requirements, our businesses or the financial markets or fail to enhance our risk framework to address those changes in a timely fashion. If our risk framework is ineffective, either because it fails to keep pace with changes in the financial markets, legal and regulatory requirements, our businesses, our counterparties, clients or service providers or for other reasons, we could incur losses, suffer reputational damage or find ourselves out of compliance with applicable regulatory or contractual mandates or expectations. These risks are magnified as client requirements become more complex and as our increasingly global business requires end-to-end management of operational and other processes across multiple time zones and many inter-related products and services.


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 29

Table of Contents



We may take actions to maintain client satisfaction that result in losses or reduced earnings.
We may take action or incur expenses in order to maintain client satisfaction or preserve the usefulness of investments or investment vehicles we manage in light of changes in security ratings, liquidity or valuation issues or other developments, even though we are not required to do so by law or the terms of governing instruments. The risk that we will decide to take actions to maintain client satisfaction that result in losses or reduced earnings is greater in periods when credit or equity markets are deteriorating in value or are particularly volatile and liquidity in markets is disrupted.


Other Risks
Changes in tax laws and interpretations and tax challenges may affect our earnings negatively.
Both U.S. and non-U.S. governments and tax authorities, including states and municipalities, from time to time issue new, or modify existing, tax laws and regulations. These authorities may also issue new, or modify existing, interpretations of those laws and regulations. These new laws, regulations or interpretations, and our actions taken in response to, or reliance upon, such changes in the tax laws may impact our tax position in a manner that affects our earnings negatively.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1) (the Act) was signed into law. The Act introduced a number of changes in then-existing tax law impacting businesses including, among other things, a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, disallowance of certain deductions that had previously been allowed, limitations on interest deductions, alteration of the expensing of capital expenditures, adoption of a territorial tax system, assessment of a repatriation tax or “toll-charge” on undistributed earnings and profits of U.S.-owned foreign corporations, and introduction of certain anti-base erosion provisions. In the fourth quarter of 2017, we recognized a net tax benefit of $53.1 million associated with the Act. In conjunction with the issuance by the IRS of additional guidance with respect to the Act and certain additional analyses conducted by the Corporation, we also recognized an additional $4.8 million of net income tax benefits in 2018 related to the Act. The ultimate impact of the Act on our financial condition and results of operations in 2018 and future years remains uncertain and may differ materially from our expectations due to the issuance of technical guidance regarding elements of the Act, changes in interpretations and assumptions we have made with respect to the Act, and changes to the competitive landscape in which we operate and other factors.
In the course of our business, we are sometimes subject to challenges from U.S. and non-U.S. tax authorities, including states and municipalities, regarding the amount of taxes due. These challenges may result in adjustments to the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions, all of which may require a greater provision for taxes or otherwise affect earnings negatively.


Changes in accounting standards may be difficult to predict and could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
New accounting standards, changes to existing accounting standards, or changes in the interpretation of existing accounting standards by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the International Accounting Standards Board, the SEC or bank regulatory agencies, or otherwise reflected in GAAP, potentially could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations. These changes are difficult to predict and in some cases we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the revised treatment of certain transactions or activities, or even the restatement of consolidated financial statements for prior periods.


Our ability to return capital to stockholders is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and may be limited by U.S. banking laws and regulations, applicable provisions of Delaware law, or our failure to pay full and timely dividends on our preferred stock and the terms of our outstanding debt.
Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive only such dividends and other distributions of capital as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments under Delaware law. Although we have declared cash dividends on shares of our common stock historically, we are not required to do so. In addition to the approval of our Board of Directors, our ability to take certain actions, including our ability to pay dividends, repurchase stock, and make other capital distributions, is dependent upon, among other things, their payment being made in accordance with athe capital plan asrules and capital adequacy standards of the Federal Reserve Board. On June 25, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board



24 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




imposed restrictions that were designed to whichcause large bank holding companies to preserve capital, including suspending share repurchases, capping dividend payments, and only allowing common stock dividends according to a formula based on recent income. On December 18, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board has not objected. There canextended a portion of these restrictions to limit share repurchases and dividend payments based on recent income. These restrictions will apply for the first quarter of 2021 and may be no assurance that the Federal Reserve Board will not object to our future capital plans. In addition to imposing restrictions on our ability to return capital to stockholders, an objection by the Federal Reserve Board to a future capital plan would negatively impact our reputation and investor perceptions of us.extended further.
A significant source of funds for the Corporation is dividends from the Bank. As a result, our ability to pay dividends on the Corporation’s common stock will depend on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Corporation. There are various legal limitations on the extent to which the Bank and the Corporation’s other subsidiaries can supply funds to the Corporation by dividend or otherwise. Dividend payments by the Bank to the Corporation in the future will require continued generation of earnings by the Bank and could require regulatory approval under certain circumstances. If the

30   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents


Bank is unable to pay dividends to the Corporation in the future, our ability to pay dividends on the Corporation’s common stock would be affected adversely.
Our ability to declare or pay dividends on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, shares of our common stock or any of our shares that rank junior to our preferred stock as to the payment of dividends and/or the distribution of any assets on any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Corporation also generally will be prohibited in the event that we do not declare and pay in full dividends on our Series C Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (Series C preferred stock) and Series D Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (Series D preferred stock) and Series E Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (Series E preferred stock). Further, in the future if we default on certain of our outstanding debt or elect to defer interest payments on our Floating Rate Capital Debt we will be prohibited from making dividend payments on our common stock until such payments have been brought current.
Any reduction or elimination of our common stock dividend, or even our failure to increase our common stock dividend along with our competitors, likely would have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.
For more information on dividend restrictions, see “Supervision and Regulation-PaymentRegulation—Payment of Dividends” and “Supervision and Regulation—Capital Planning and Stress Testing” in Item 1, “Business,“Business. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES
The executive offices of the Corporation and the Bank are located at 50 South La Salle Street in Chicago. This Bank-owned building is occupied by various divisions of Northern Trust’s businesses. Adjacent to this building are twois one office buildingsbuilding in which the Bank leases space principally for corporate support functions. Financial services are provided by the Bank and other subsidiaries of the Corporation through a network of offices in 2022 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., and across 2322 locations in Canada, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region. The majority of those offices are leased. The Bank’s other primary U.S. operations are located in sixfive facilities: a leased facility at 801333 South Canal Street in Chicago; a leased facility at 231 South La Salle StreetWabash Avenue in Chicago; a leased facility in Tempe, Arizona; and threeone leased and two Bank-owned supplementary operations/data center buildings located in the western suburbs of Chicago. A majority of the Bank’s London-based staff is located at a leased facility at Canary Wharf in London. Additional support and operations activity originates from threefour facilities in Bangalore,India, two facilities in Limerick, as well asIreland, and one facility in each of Manila and Pune,the Philippines, all of which are leased. The Bank and the Corporation’s other subsidiaries operate from various other facilities in North America, Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, and the Middle East, most of which are leased.
The Corporation believes that its owned and leased facilities are suitable and adequate for its business needs. The Corporation continues to evaluate its owned and leased facilities and may determine from time to time that certain of its facilities are no longer necessary for its operations. There is no assurance that the Corporation will be able to dispose of any excess facilities or that it will not incur costs in connection with such dispositions, which could be material to its operating results in a given period.
For additional information relating to properties and lease commitments, refer to Note 9, “Buildings and Equipment” and Note 10, “Lease Commitments,” included under Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information presented under the caption “Legal Proceedings” in Note 25, “Contingent26, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” included under Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 3125





ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

32   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM – INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following sets forth certain information with regard to each executive officer of the Corporation.


Michael G. O’Grady - Mr. O’Grady, age 53,55, joined Northern Trust in 2011 and has served as Chairman of the Board since January 2019, as Chief Executive Officer since January 2018 and as President since January 2017. Prior to that, Mr. O’Grady served as Executive Vice President and President of Corporate & Institutional Services from 2014 to 2016 and as Chief Financial Officer from 2011 to 2014. Before joining Northern Trust, Mr. O’Grady served as a Managing Director in Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Investment Banking Group.


Aileen B. BlakeLauren E. Allnutt - Ms. Blake,Allnutt, age 51,44, joined Northern Trust in 20042008 and has served as an Executive Vice President since November 2020 and as Controller since May 2017.2019. Prior to that, Ms. BlakeAllnutt served as Executive Vice Presidentmanager of Global Financial Control from 2014 to April 2019 and Director of Financial Planningled International Accounting Policy and StrategyControl from February 20162013 to May 2017 and as Head of Enterprise Productivity from 2011 to February 2016. She also previously served as Controller from 2004 to 2011.2014.


S. Biff Bowman - Mr. Bowman, age 55, joined Northern Trust in 1985 and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Bowman served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources from 2012 to 2014. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Bowman was the Head of Americas for Corporate & Institutional Services. From 2008 to 2010, he served as Executive Vice President, Corporate & Institutional Services for Europe, Middle East and Africa.

Robert P. Browne - Mr. Browne, age 53,55, joined Northern Trust in 2009 as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer. Before joining Northern Trust, Mr. Browne served as Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income and Proprietary Investments forin various senior investment-related roles at ING Investment Management Holdings N.V. from 2004 to 2009.


Peter B. Cherecwich - Mr. Cherecwich, age 54,56, joined Northern Trust in 2007 and has served as Executive Vice President and President of Corporate & Institutional Services since February 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Cherecwich served as Executive Vice President and President of Global Fund Services from 2010 to 2017 and as Chief Operating Officer of Corporate & Institutional Services from 2008 to 2014. From 2007 to 2008, he served as Head of Institutional Strategy & Product Development. Before joining Northern Trust, Mr. Cherecwich served in several executive and operational roles at State Street Corporation.


Steven L. Fradkin - Mr. Fradkin, age 57,59, joined Northern Trust in 1985 and has served as Executive Vice President and President of Wealth Management since September 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Fradkin served as President of Corporate & Institutional Services from 2009 to 2014. HeFrom 2004 to 2009, he served as Chief Financial Officer from 2004 to 2009.Officer.


Wilson LeechMark C. Gossett - Mr. Leech,Gossett, age 57,59, joined Northern Trust in 20041983 and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer since February 2017.2020. Prior to that, Mr. LeechGossett served as Executive Vice President, Corporate & Institutional Services for Europe, Middle EastChief Credit Officer and AfricaHead of Market and Liquidity Risk from 20102014 to 2017January 2020 and as HeadCo-Head of Global Fund ServicesForeign Exchange from 2012 to 2014. Mr. Gossett also previously served as the Chief Risk Officer of Asset Management from 2009 to 2012 and as the Chief Operating Officer of Asset Management from 2005 to 2010. From 2004 to 2005, he served as Chief Financial Officer for Europe, Middle East and Africa and Asia Pacific. Before joining Northern Trust, Mr. Leech served in various operational and financial roles at State Street Corporation and the Royal Bank of Scotland.2009.


Susan C. Levy - Ms. Levy, age 61,63, joined Northern Trust in 2014 and has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel since that time and as Corporate Secretary since October 2018. Before joining Northern Trust, Ms. Levy served as Managing Partner of the law firm Jenner & Block from 2008 to 2014, where she was a partner since 1990.


Teresa A. Parker - Ms. Parker, age 58,60, joined Northern Trust in 1982 and has served as Executive Vice President and President of Corporate & Institutional Services for Europe, Middle East and Africa since June 2017. Prior to that, Ms. Parker served as Chief Operating Officer of Corporate & Institutional Services from 2014 to 2017. From 2009 to 2014, she served as Executive Vice President, Corporate & Institutional Services for Asia Pacific.the Asia-Pacific region.


Thomas A. South - Mr. South, age 49,51, joined Northern Trust in 1999 and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer since September 2018. Prior to that, Mr. South served as Chief Business Architect from 2014 to 2018 and as Chief Operating Officer forof Operations & Technology from 2013 to 2014.



2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 33



Joyce M. St. Clair - Ms. St. Clair, age 59,61, joined Northern Trust in 1992 and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since July 2018. Prior to that, Ms. St. Clair served as Executive Vice President and Chief Capital Management Officer from 2015 to 2018, as President of Enterprise Operations from 2014 to 2015, as President of Operations & Technology from 2011 to 2014, and as Chief Risk Officer from 2007 to 2011.





26 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




Shundrawn A. Thomas - Mr. Thomas, age 45,47, joined Northern Trust in 2004 and has served as Executive Vice President and President of Asset Management since October 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Thomas served as Executive Vice President and Head of the Funds and Managed Accounts Group from 2014 to 2017 and as Head of the Exchange-Traded Funds Group from 2010 to 2014. HeMr. Thomas also previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Northern Trust Securities, Inc. from 2009 to 2010 and as Head of Corporate Strategy from 2006 to 2009.


Jason J. Tyler - Mr. Tyler, age 49, joined Northern Trust in 2011 and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2020. Prior to that, Mr. Tyler served as Chief Financial Officer of Wealth Management from 2018 to December 2019, as Global Head of Asset Management’s Institutional Group from 2014 to 2018, and as Global Head of Strategy from 2011 to 2014. Before joining Northern Trust, Mr. Tyler served in certain executive and operational roles at Ariel Investments and Bank One/American National Bank.

All officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors. Officers continue to hold office until their successors are duly elected or until their death, resignation or removal by the Board.



34   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation27






PART II
ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the symbol “NTRS.” There were 1,8051,643 shareholders of record as of January 31, 2019.2021.
The following table shows certain information relating to the Corporation’s purchases of common stock for the three months ended December 31, 2018.2020.


TABLE 2: PURCHASES3: REPURCHASES OF COMMON STOCK IN THE FOURTH QUARTER OF20182020
PERIODTOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASEDAVERAGE PRICE PAID PER SHARETOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASED AS PART OF A PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED PLANMAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES THAT MAY YET BE PURCHASED UNDER THE PLAN
October 1 - 31, 2020— $— — 6,487,647 
November 1 - 30, 2020— — — 6,487,647 
December 1 - 31, 2020— — — 6,487,647 
Total (Fourth Quarter)— $— — 6,487,647 
PERIODTOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASED
AVERAGE PRICE PAID PER SHARE
TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASED AS PART OF A PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED PLAN (1)
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES THAT MAY YET BE PURCHASED UNDER THE PLAN
October 1 - 31, 2018797,315
$97.04
797,315
22,085,658
November 1 - 30, 2018545,459
96.25
545,459
21,540,199
December 1 - 31, 20181,139,328
88.53
1,139,328
20,400,871
     
Total (Fourth Quarter)2,482,102
$92.96
2,482,102
20,400,871


(1) Repurchases were made pursuant toOn March 16, 2020, the Corporation suspended its share repurchase program, previously announced by the Corporation on July 17, 2018, under which the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized the Corporation to repurchase up to 25.0 million shares of the Corporation'sCorporation’s common stock. The repurchase programauthorization approved by the Board of Directors has no expiration date. Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, the Federal Reserve announced certain measures to ensure that large financial institutions, including Northern Trust, remain resilient despite the economic uncertainty resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, for the third and fourth quarters of 2020, no share repurchases were permitted by these institutions. On December 18, 2020, the Federal Reserve again extended its capital distribution limits into the first quarter of 2021 with certain modifications, which include continuing to limit dividend payments based on recent income and limiting share repurchases based on recent income. During the first quarter of 2021, the Corporation restarted its share repurchase program in accordance with such limitations. For more information, please refer to Note 15, “Stockholders’ Equity,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”







201828 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation35

Table of Contents




COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN


The following graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Corporation’s common stock to the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and the KBW Bank Index for the five fiscal years ended December 31, 2018.2020. The cumulative total stockholder return assumes the investment of $100 in the Corporation’s common stock and in each index on December 31, 20132015 and assumes reinvestment of dividends. The KBW Bank Index is a modified-capitalization-weighted index made up of 24 of the largest banking companies in the United States. The Corporation is included in the S&P 500 Index and the KBW Bank Index.


Total Return Assumes $100 Invested on
December 31, 20132015 with Reinvestment of Dividends
chart-64ea4858b6d05d438a2.jpgntrs-20201231_g1.jpg
DECEMBER 31,
201520162017201820192020
Northern Trust$100 $126 $144 $123 $160 $146 
S&P 500100 112 136 130 171 203 
KBW Bank Index100 129 152 125 171 153 

 DECEMBER 31,
 2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Northern Trust$100
$111
$121
$153
$174
$149
S&P 500100
114
115
129
157
150
KBW Bank Index100
109
110
141
167
138


36   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation29






ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,20202019201820172016
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME ($ In Millions)
Noninterest Income$4,657.6 $4,395.2 $4,337.5 $3,946.1 $3,726.9 
Net Interest Income1,443.2 1,677.9 1,622.7 1,429.2 1,234.9 
Total Revenue$6,100.8 $6,073.1 $5,960.2 $5,375.3 $4,961.8 
Provision for Credit Losses125.0 (14.5)(14.5)(28.0)(26.0)
Noninterest Expense4,348.2 4,143.5 4,016.9 3,769.4 3,470.7 
Income before Income Taxes$1,627.6 $1,944.1 $1,957.8 $1,633.9 $1,517.1 
Provision for Income Taxes418.3 451.9 401.4 434.9 484.6 
Net Income$1,209.3 $1,492.2 $1,556.4 $1,199.0 $1,032.5 
Preferred Stock Dividends56.2 46.4 46.4 49.8 23.4 
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock$1,153.1 $1,445.8 $1,510.0 $1,149.2 $1,009.1 
PER COMMON SHARE
Net Income – Basic$5.48 $6.66 $6.68 $4.95 $4.35 
  – Diluted5.46 6.63 6.64 4.92 4.32 
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share2.80 2.60 1.94 1.60 1.48 
Book Value – End of Period (EOP)51.87 46.82 43.95 41.28 38.88 
Market Price – EOP93.14 106.24 83.59 99.89 89.05 
SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA ($ In Millions)
At Year End:
Earning Assets$158,531.6 $125,236.6 $122,847.3 $129,656.6 $115,446.4 
Total Assets170,003.9 136,828.4 132,212.5 138,590.5 123,926.9 
Deposits143,878.0 109,120.6 104,496.8 112,390.8 101,651.7 
Senior Notes3,122.4 2,573.0 2,011.3 1,497.3 1,496.6 
Long-Term Debt1,189.3 1,148.1 1,112.4 1,449.5 1,330.9 
Stockholders’ Equity11,688.3 11,091.0 10,508.3 10,216.2 9,770.4 
Average Balances:
Earning Assets$124,132.9 $107,109.4 $113,731.0 $111,178.3 $107,037.6 
Total Assets136,811.1 117,551.4 122,946.6 119,607.4 115,570.3 
Deposits108,511.1 89,786.0 95,103.1 96,504.8 93,613.9 
Senior Notes3,233.8 2,389.1 1,704.0 1,496.9 1,496.6 
Long-Term Debt1,189.2 1,139.0 1,296.8 1,519.4 1,392.4 
Stockholders’ Equity11,192.6 10,648.4 10,228.9 9,980.6 9,085.3 
CLIENT ASSETS ($ In Billions)
Assets Under Custody/Administration(1)
$14,532.5 $12,050.4 $10,125.3 $10,722.6 $8,541.3 
Assets Under Custody11,262.8 9,233.5 7,593.9 8,084.6 6,720.5 
Assets Under Management1,405.3 1,231.3 1,069.4 1,161.0 942.4 
SELECTED RATIOS AND METRICS
Financial Ratios and Metrics:
Return on Average Common Equity11.2 %14.9 %16.2 %12.6 %11.9 %
Return on Average Assets0.88 1.27 1.27 1.00 0.89 
Dividend Payout Ratio51.3 39.2 29.2 32.5 34.3 
Average Stockholders’ Equity to Average Assets8.2 9.1 8.3 8.3 7.9 
 2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,     
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In Millions)     
Noninterest Income$4,337.5
$3,946.1
$3,726.9
$3,632.5
$3,325.7
Net Interest Income1,622.7
1,429.2
1,234.9
1,070.1
1,005.5
Total Revenue$5,960.2
$5,375.3
$4,961.8
$4,702.6
$4,331.2
Provision for Credit Losses(14.5)(28.0)(26.0)(43.0)6.0
Noninterest Expense4,016.9
3,769.4
3,470.7
3,280.6
3,135.0
Income before Income Taxes$1,957.8
$1,633.9
$1,517.1
$1,465.0
$1,190.2
Provision for Income Taxes401.4
434.9
484.6
491.2
378.4
Net Income$1,556.4
$1,199.0
$1,032.5
$973.8
$811.8
Preferred Stock Dividends46.4
49.8
23.4
23.4
9.5
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock$1,510.0
$1,149.2
$1,009.1
$950.4
$802.3
      
PER COMMON SHARE     
Net Income – Basic$6.68
$4.95
$4.35
$4.03
$3.34
  – Diluted6.64
4.92
4.32
3.99
3.32
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share1.94
1.60
1.48
1.41
1.30
Book Value – End of Period (EOP)43.95
41.28
38.88
36.27
34.54
Market Price – EOP83.59
99.89
89.05
72.09
67.40
      
SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA (In Millions)     
At Year End:     
Earning Assets$122,847.3
$129,656.6
$115,446.4
$106,848.9
$100,889.8
Total Assets132,212.5
138,590.5
123,926.9
116,749.6
109,946.5
Deposits104,496.8
112,390.8
101,651.7
96,868.9
90,757.0
Senior Notes2,011.3
1,497.3
1,496.6
1,497.4
1,497.0
Long-Term Debt1,112.4
1,449.5
1,330.9
1,371.3
1,615.1
Stockholders’ Equity10,508.3
10,216.2
9,770.4
8,705.9
8,448.9
Average Balances:     
Earning Assets$113,731.0
$111,178.3
$107,037.6
$102,249.8
$95,947.5
Total Assets122,946.6
119,607.4
115,570.3
110,715.1
104,083.5
Deposits95,103.1
96,504.8
93,613.9
90,768.0
84,656.6
Senior Notes1,704.0
1,496.9
1,496.6
1,497.2
1,661.2
Long-Term Debt1,296.8
1,519.4
1,392.4
1,426.4
1,654.9
Stockholders’ Equity10,228.9
9,980.6
9,085.3
8,624.5
8,166.5
      
CLIENT ASSETS (In Billions)     
Assets Under Custody/Administration$10,125.3
$10,722.6
$8,541.3
$7,797.0
N/A
Assets Under Custody7,593.9
8,084.6
6,720.5
6,072.1
5,968.8
Assets Under Management1,069.4
1,161.0
942.4
875.3
934.1
      
SELECTED RATIOS AND METRICS     
Financial Ratios and Metrics:     
Return on Average Common Equity16.2%12.6%11.9%11.5%10.0%
Return on Average Assets1.27
1.00
0.89
0.88
0.78
Dividend Payout Ratio29.2
32.5
34.3
35.3
39.2
Net Interest Margin (*)
1.46
1.33
1.18
1.07
1.08
Average Stockholders’ Equity to Average Assets8.3
8.3
7.9
7.8
7.8
Capital Ratios:DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019DECEMBER 31, 2018
STANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED APPROACHSTANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED APPROACHSTANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED
APPROACH
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital12.8 %13.4 %12.7 %13.2 %12.9 %13.7 %
Tier 1 Capital13.9 14.5 14.5 15.0 14.1 15.0 
Total Capital15.6 15.9 16.3 16.8 16.1 16.9 
Tier 1 Leverage7.6 7.6 8.7 8.7 8.0 8.0 
Supplementary Leverage(2)
N/A8.6 N/A7.6 N/A7.0 
DECEMBER 31, 2017DECEMBER 31, 2016
STANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED
APPROACH
STANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED
APPROACH
WELL-CAPITALIZED RATIOSMINIMUM CAPITAL RATIOS
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital12.6 %13.5 %11.8 %12.4 %N/A4.5 %
Tier 1 Capital13.8 14.8 12.9 13.7 6.0 6.0 
Total Capital15.8 16.7 14.5 15.1 10.0 8.0 
Tier 1 Leverage7.8 7.8 8.0 8.0 N/A4.0 
Supplementary Leverage(2)
N/A6.8 N/A6.8 N/A3.0 
(1)For the purposes of disclosing Assets Under Custody/Administration, to the extent that both custody and administration services are provided, the value of the assets is included only once.
Capital Ratios:DECEMBER 31,
2018
DECEMBER 31,
2017
DECEMBER 31,
2016
DECEMBER 31,
2015
DECEMBER 31,
2014
 
ADVANCED
APPROACH
STANDARDIZED
APPROACH(a)
ADVANCED
APPROACH
STANDARDIZED
APPROACH(a)
ADVANCED
APPROACH
STANDARDIZED
APPROACH(a)
ADVANCED
APPROACH
STANDARDIZED
APPROACH
(a)
ADVANCED
APPROACH
STANDARDIZED
APPROACH
(a)
Common Equity Tier 113.7%12.9%13.5%12.6%12.4%11.8%11.9%10.8%12.4%12.5%
Tier 115.0
14.1
14.8
13.8
13.7
12.9
12.5
11.4
13.2
13.3
Total16.9
16.1
16.7
15.8
15.1
14.5
14.2
13.2
15.0
15.5
Tier 1 Leverage8.0
8.0
7.8
7.8
8.0
8.0
7.5
7.5
N/A
7.8
Supplementary Leverage(b)
7.0
N/A
6.8
N/A
6.8
N/A
6.2
N/A
N/A
N/A

(*) Net interest margin is presented on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis, a non-generally-accepted-accounting-principle (GAAP) financial measure that facilitates the analysis of asset yields. The net interest margin on a GAAP basis and a reconciliation of net interest income on a GAAP basis to net interest income on an FTE basis are presented on page 88.
(a) In 2014, Standardized Approach risk-weighted assets were determined by Basel I requirements. Effective with the first quarter of 2015, risk-weighted assets are calculated in accordance with the Basel II Standardized Approach final rules.
(b) Effective with the first quarter of 2015, advanced approaches banking organizations must calculate and report their supplementary leverage ratio. (2) Effective January 1, 2018, the Corporation and Bank are subject to a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 3 percent. Refer to the “Supervision and Regulation—Capital Adequacy Requirements” section of Item 1, “Business” for further information on the supplementary leverage ratio.





201830 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation37

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations (MD&A) of Northern Trust Corporation (Corporation) for the year ended December 31, 2020. The following should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes included in this report. Investors also should read the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.”
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Northern TrustThe Corporation (the Corporation) is a financial holding company that is a leading provider of wealth management, asset servicing, asset management and banking solutions to corporations, institutions, families and individuals. The Corporation focuses on managing and servicing client assets through its two client-focused reporting segments: Corporate & Institutional Services (C&IS) and Wealth Management. Asset management and related services are provided to C&IS and Wealth Management clients primarily by the Asset Management business.
The Corporation conducts business through various U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries, including The Northern Trust Company (the Bank). The Corporation was originally formed as a holding company for the Bank in 1971. The Corporation has a global presence with offices in 2022 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., and across 2322 locations in Canada, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region. Except where the context requires otherwise, the terms “Northern Trust,” “we,” “us,” “our”“our,” “its,” or similar terms refers to the Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND RECENT EVENTS
The COVID-19 pandemic presented health and economic challenges on an unprecedented scale during the year ended December 31, 2020. During this time, Northern Trust focused on the health and well-being of its workforce, meeting its clients’ needs and supporting its communities. Although planning is underway to return to the office when conditions permit, the vast majority of staff is expected to continue to work remotely for some time to come.
Workforce
As governments implement plans to reopen their respective jurisdictions, Northern Trust has begun its return-to-office (RTO) planning under the oversight of its COVID Executive Committee composed of senior leadership across various functions. Plans for RTO were developed on a location-by-location basis based on business unit needs. Northern Trust considers site readiness, transportation options, technology capabilities, and workforce alignment, and has plans for the return of a small portion of each office’s population in the initial RTO phase to allow for optimal social distancing. To ensure the health and well-being of Northern Trust’s workforce, clients and visitors, several social distancing elements and other protective measures were implemented, such as temperature screenings, where allowable by law, distribution of personal protective equipment, and workforce health self-certifications. Several offices returned portions of their workforce in the second half of 2020.
Client Service
Northern Trust offered assistance to its clients affected by the COVID-19 pandemic by lending under a government lending program and providing payment deferrals. The Corporation continues to assess developments in government actions meant to support the economy, as further discussed below.
U.S. Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program
During the second quarter of 2020, Northern Trust became a lender under the Paycheck Protection Program, as amended (PPP), which is administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), an agency of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which works with financial institutions in providing loans to small businesses. The PPP, which is meant to aid small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic, was created under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which was signed into law on March 27, 2020.
As of December 31, 2020, Northern Trust had 1,087 outstanding loans totaling $207.1 million under the PPP. 41 loans totaling $6.7 million underwent the loan forgiveness process, with 36 loans totaling $6.7 million being fully forgiven as of December 31, 2020.
The original timeframe for PPP lending expired on June 30, 2020, when Congress acted to extend PPP lending for a 5-week period to allow small businesses additional time to apply for the remaining PPP funds allocated by Congress in connection with the CARES Act. Northern Trust continued to lend under the PPP through the new August 8, 2020 deadline. The Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits and Venues Act (the Economic Aid Act) amended the PPP by extending the authority of the SBA to guarantee loans and the ability of PPP lenders to disburse PPP loans until
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 31

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
March 31. 2021. For further information on the PPP, please refer to Note 6, “Loans and Leases,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR) Relief
Due to the economic environment arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been two forms of relief provided to lenders exempting certain loan modifications which would otherwise be classified as TDRs from such classification. The first of these forms of relief is provided by certain interagency guidance from various banking regulators, including the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, the National Credit Union Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Interagency Guidance). The other is provided under section 4013 of the CARES Act. Northern Trust has elected to apply each of these forms of relief, when applicable, in providing borrowers with qualifying loan modifications, including payment deferrals, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. For further information on TDRs, please refer to Note 6, “Loans and Leases,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Community Support
COVID-19 Relief Support
Through December 31, 2020, Northern Trust provided $2.5 million in COVID-19 relief support to numerous organizations serving those most affected by the pandemic. Grantees include Americares, Doctors Without Borders, Feeding America, the Global FoodBanking Network, the Irish Red Cross, Meals on Wheels, NHS Charities Together, the Solidarity Response Fund for the World Health Organization, United Way Worldwide, World Food Program, and other COVID-19 relief funds in Chicago and Illinois to benefit those in need.

Small Business Support
Through December 31, 2020, Northern Trust provided $110.5 million in low-cost funding to assist Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs), which are instrumental in providing loans to small businesses and non-profit organizations under the PPP. The funding helps meet urgent demand among small businesses and non-profit groups by providing flexible terms and low rates. CDFIs provide loans, investments, financial services and technical assistance to underserved populations and communities. This funding, which is reported in Debt Securities Held to Maturity on the consolidated balance sheets, is separate and distinct from the $207.1 million of outstanding principal of loans made under the PPP.

Additional COVID-19 economic and market-related impacts to the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations are discussed throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
Net income in 2018 totaled $1.56 billion, up $357.4Income decreased $282.9 million, or 30%19%, from $1.20to $1.21 billion in 2017.2020 from $1.49 billion in 2019. Earnings per diluted common share totaled $6.64was $5.46 in 20182020 compared to $4.92$6.63 in 2017.2019. Return on average common equity improveddecreased to 16.2%11.2% in 20182020 from 12.6%14.9% in 2017.2019.
Revenue increased 11%$27.7 million to $5.96$6.10 billion in 20182020 from $5.38$6.07 billion in the prior year, primarily driven by a 9% increaseincreases in trust, investmentTrust, Investment and other servicing fees, a 14% increase in net interest income,Other Servicing Fees of 4%, Other Operating Income of 33%, Foreign Exchange Trading Income of 16%, and a 46% increase in foreign exchange trading income,Security Commissions and Trading Income of 29%, partially offset by a 19% declinedecrease in other operating income.Net Interest Income of 14%.
Client assets under custody/administration (AUC/A) increased 21% from $12.05 trillion as of December 31, 2019 to $14.53 trillion as of December 31, 2020, primarily reflecting net inflows, favorable markets, and favorable currency translation. Client assets under custody, a component of AUC/A, were each down 6%,increased 22% from $9.23 trillion as of December 31, 2018 as compared2019 to December 31, 2017 levels. Client assets under management were down 8%$11.26 trillion as of December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017 levels. As of December 31, 2018, AUC/A decreased to $10.13 trillion from $10.72 trillion at December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, client2020. Client assets under custody decreased to $7.59 trillion from $8.08 trillion, and included $4.70$7.42 trillion of global custody assets down 5%as of December 31, 2020, which increased 26% from $4.94$5.89 trillion as of December 31, 2019. Client assets under management increased 14% to $1.41 trillion as of December 31, 2020 from $1.23 trillion at December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, client assets under management decreased2019 due to $1.07 trillion from $1.16 trillion at December 31, 2017.favorable markets and net inflows.
Trust, investmentInvestment and other servicing fees,Other Servicing Fees, which represent the largest component of total revenue, increased 9%4% to $3.75 billion, from $3.43$4.00 billion in 2017,2020, from $3.85 billion in 2019, primarily due to new business and favorable markets, revenue associated with the acquisition and integration of UBS Asset Management’spartially offset by money market mutual fund administration units in Luxembourg and Switzerland (the UBS acquisition), new business, a change in presentation of certain fees resulting from the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard, and the favorable impact of movements in foreign exchange rates.fee waivers.
Foreign exchange trading incomeExchange Trading Income of $307.2 million increased 46% from $209.9$290.4 million in 2017,2020 increased 16% from $250.9 million in 2019, primarily resulting fromdriven by higher client volumes and increased market volatility, partially offset by lower foreign exchange swap activity in TreasuryTreasury.
Security Commissions and Trading Income of $133.2 million in 2020 increased 29% from $103.6 million in 2019, primarily driven by higher volatility.core brokerage revenue and revenue from interest rate swaps.



32 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Other operating income was $127.5Operating Income of $194.0 million in 2018, down 19%2020 increased 33% from $157.5$145.5 million in 2019, primarily due to higher income related to a bank-owned life insurance program implemented during 2019, a charge in the prior year primarily duerelated to the impairmentdecision made to sell substantially all of a community development equity investment previously held at cost, expenses related to existing swap agreements related to Visa Inc. Class B common shares,the lease portfolio, and the net impact of various other operating income categories.higher miscellaneous income.
Net interest incomeInterest Income on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis in 2018 was $1.66 billion, an increase of $188.9 million, or 13%, from $1.48 billion in 2017,2020, decreased $233.1 million, or 14%, from $1.71 billion in 2019, due to an increaseda decreased net interest margin, andpartially offset by higher levels of average earning assets. The net interest margin on an FTE basis increaseddecreased to 1.46%1.19% in 20182020 from 1.33%1.60% in 2017,2019, primarily due to higher short-termlower interest rates.
The provision forCorporation adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13) on January 1, 2020, which significantly changed the way impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of financial instruments. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, the Corporation recorded a $13.7 million increase in 2018the Allowance for Credit Losses with a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment to decrease Retained Earnings by $10.1 million, net of income taxes. For more information on the adoption of ASU 2016-13, please refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The Provision for Credit Losses in 2020 was $125.0 million as compared to a credit provision of $14.5 million reflecting reductionsin 2019. The provision for 2020 reflected an increase in the reserve evaluated on a collective basis. The increase in the collective basis reserve was primarily driven by current and projected economic conditions and downgrades in the portfolio, both resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts, with increases primarily in the commercial and institutional and commercial real estate portfolios. The prior-year credit provision primarily reflected a decrease in the inherent reserve related to the residential real estate portfolio due to a reduction in outstanding loans and undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit and improved credit quality acrossand reductions to the portfolio. This was partially offset by increases in specific reserves primarilyreserve related to the commercial and institutional portfolio. The provision for credit losses in 2017 was a credit of $28.0 million, reflecting improvementand residential real estate portfolios, partially offset by an increase in the credit quality ofinherent reserve related to the Corporation’s loanprivate client portfolio and reductionsdue to an increase in outstanding loans and undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit.lower credit quality. Loans and leasesLeases of $33.8 billion as of December 31, 2018 totaled $32.52020 increased from $31.4 billion down slightly from $32.6 billion in 2017.as of December 31, 2019. Net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 20182020 were $1.1$3.2 million, down from $10.2compared to net recoveries of $0.7 million in 2017. Nonperformingfor the year ended December 31, 2019. Nonaccrual assets increased to $132.4 million as of December 31, 2018 were $117.72020 from $86.8 million a decline from $155.3 million in 2017.as of December 31, 2019.
Noninterest expense totaled $4.02Expense of $4.35 billion in 2018, up $247.52020 increased $204.7 million, or 7%5%, from $3.77$4.14 billion in the prior year,2019, primarily reflecting increased compensation, outside services, equipmentCompensation, Equipment and software expense,Software, Employee Benefits, Occupancy, and employee benefit expense, including higher third-party advisor costs due to a change in presentation resulting from the adoption of the new revenue

38   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


recognition standard and higher expenses associated with the UBS acquisition,Other Operating Expense, partially offset by lower severance and related charges. The prior year alsoOutside Services. Noninterest Expense in 2020 included a one-time employee cash bonus recordedseverance-related charges of $55.0 million in connection with the Tax Cutsa reduction in force, a $43.4 million charge related to a corporate action processing error, and Jobs Act (TCJA).Occupancy expense related to an early lease exit arising from a workplace real estate strategy of $11.9 million.
The provisionProvision for income taxesIncome Taxes in 20182020 totaled $401.4$418.3 million, representing an effective tax rate of 20.5%25.7%. The provisionProvision for income taxesIncome Taxes in 20172019 totaled $434.9$451.9 million, representing an effective tax rate of 26.6%23.2%. The current year includes a net benefitincrease in the effective tax rate was primarily driven by $26.8 million of tax expense related to the reversal of tax provision primarily attributable tobenefits previously recognized through earnings and higher taxes payable on the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% as a result of the TCJA enacted in the fourth quarter of 2017 as well as adjustments recorded in the current year associated with the implementation of the TCJA. Also in 2018, the Corporation recognized a tax benefit resulting from a change in accounting method regarding the timing of tax deductions for software-development related expenses. These decreases to the provision for income taxes in the current year were partially offset by tax accounting changes in 2018 brought about by the TCJA including the tax accounting associated with additional non-deductible expenses and a reduction in the income tax benefit derived from the vesting of restricted stock units and stock option exercises.Corporation’s non-U.S. branches.
Northern Trust continued to maintain a strong capital position during 2018,2020, with all capital ratios exceeding those required for classification as “well-capitalized” under federal bank regulatory capital requirements. Total stockholders’ equity was $10.5Stockholders’ Equity increased 5% from $11.1 billion in 2019 to $11.7 billion at year-end up 3% from $10.2 billion2020. During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Corporation issued and sold 16 million depositary shares, each representing 1/1,000th ownership interest in 2017.a share of Series E Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock for proceeds of $391.4 million, net of underwriting discounts, commissions, and other issuance costs. These proceeds were subsequently used to fund the redemption of all outstanding shares of the Corporation’s Series C Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock on January 2, 2020.
The Corporation suspended its open-market share repurchase program on March 16, 2020. Prior to the suspension, 2,743,876 shares of common stock were repurchased on the open market at a total cost of $246.4 million. Subsequent to the suspension, the only shares repurchased were shares of common stock withheld upon the vesting of share-based compensation to satisfy tax withholding obligations. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, the Corporation repurchased 3,276,589 shares of common stock, including 532,713 shares withheld related to share-based compensation, at a total cost of $299.8 million. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Northern Trust increased its quarterly common stock dividend to $0.55remained unchanged from the end of the prior year at $0.70 per share. During the first quarter of 2021, the Corporation restarted its share and repurchased 9.0 million shares of common stock, returning $1.36 billionrepurchase program in capital to common stockholders, compared to $895.6 million in 2017.accordance with limitations established by the Federal Reserve.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following information summarizes our consolidated results of operations for 2020 compared to 2019. For a discussion related to the consolidated results of operations for 2019 compared to 2018, refer to Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 33

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ended December 31, 2019 (2019 Form 10-K), which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2020.
Revenue
Northern Trust generates the majority of its revenue from noninterest incomeNoninterest Income that primarily consists of trust, investmentTrust, Investment and other servicing fees.Other Servicing Fees. Net interest incomeInterest Income comprises the remainder of revenue and consists of interest incomeInterest Income generated by earning assets, net of interest expenseInterest Expense on deposits and borrowed funds.
Revenue in 2018 was $5.962020 of $6.10 billion an increase of 11%increased from $5.38$6.07 billion in 2017.2019. Noninterest incomeIncome represented 73%76% and 72% of total revenue in 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively, and totaled $4.34 billion, up 10% from $3.95$4.66 billion in 2017.2020, which increased 6% from $4.40 billion in 2019.
The current-year increaseNoninterest Income in noninterest income2020 increased primarily reflectedreflecting higher trust, investmentTrust, Investment and other servicing feesOther Servicing Fees, Other Operating Income, Foreign Exchange Trading Income, and foreign exchange trading income,Security Commissions and Trading Income. Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees of $4.00 billion in 2020 increased $142.9 million, or 4%, from $3.85 billion in 2019, primarily due to new business and favorable markets, partially offset by lower other operating income. Trust, investment and other servicing fees totaled $3.75 billionmoney market mutual fund fee waivers. Foreign Exchange Trading Income in 2018, up $319.32020 of $290.4 million increased $39.5 million, or 9%, from $3.43 billion in 2017, primarily due to favorable markets, revenue associated with the UBS acquisition, new business, a change in presentation of certain fees resulting from the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard, and the favorable impact of movements in foreign exchange rates. Foreign exchange trading income in 2018 totaled $307.2 million, up $97.3 million, or 46%16%, compared with $209.9$250.9 million in 2017,2019, primarily resulting fromdriven by higher client volumes and increased market volatility, partially offset by lower foreign exchange swap activity in TreasuryTreasury. Security Commissions and higher volatility. Other operating income was $127.5Trading Income of $133.2 million in 2018, down 19%2020 increased 29% from $157.5$103.6 million in 2019, primarily driven by higher core brokerage revenue and revenue from interest rate swaps. Other Operating Income of $194.0 million in 2020 increased 33% from $145.5 million in the prior year, primarily due to the impairment of a community development equity investment previously held at cost, expenseshigher income related to existing swap agreementsa bank-owned life insurance program implemented during 2019, a charge in the prior year related to Visa Inc. Class B common shares,the decision made to sell substantially all of the lease portfolio, and the net impact of various other operating income categories.higher miscellaneous income.
Net interest incomeInterest Income on an FTE basis in 2018 was $1.662020 of $1.48 billion an increase of $188.9decreased $233.1 million, or 13%14%, from $1.48$1.71 billion in 2017,2019, due to an increaseda decreased net interest margin, andpartially offset by higher levels of average earning assets. The net interest margin on an FTE basis increaseddecreased to 1.46%1.19% in 20182020 from 1.33%1.60% in 2017,2019, primarily due to higher short-termlower interest rates.Average earning assets increased $2.6$17.0 billion, or 2%16%, from $107.1 billion in 2018,2019 to $124.1 billion in 2020, primarily reflecting higher levels of securities, partially offset by a decrease in loans and leases and short-term interest bearing deposits.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 39

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


deposits, Securities, and Loans and Leases.
Additional information regarding Northern Trust’s revenue by type is provided below.in the following table.


2018 TOTALTABLE 4: REVENUE OF $5.96 BILLION
chart-0f6a4b7a2a605ef9af0.jpg
n63% Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees
n27% Net Interest Income
n5% Foreign Exchange Trading Income
n5% Other Noninterest Income
Noninterest Income
The components of noninterest income, and a discussion of significant changes during 2018 and 2017, are provided below.

TABLE 3: NONINTEREST INCOME
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGEFOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
($ In Millions)202020192018
Noninterest IncomeNoninterest Income
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,753.7
$3,434.3
$3,108.1
9 %10 % Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,995.0 $3,852.1 $3,753.7 
Foreign Exchange Trading Income307.2
209.9
236.6
46
(11) Foreign Exchange Trading Income290.4 250.9 307.2 
Treasury Management Fees51.8
56.4
62.8
(8)(10) Treasury Management Fees45.4 44.5 51.8 
Security Commissions and Trading Income98.3
89.6
81.4
10
10
Security Commissions and Trading Income133.2 103.6 98.3 
Other Operating Income127.5
157.5
241.2
(19)(35) Other Operating Income194.0 145.5 127.5 
Investment Security Losses, net(1.0)(1.6)(3.2)(33)(50)
   
Investment Security Gains (Losses), net Investment Security Gains (Losses), net(0.4)(1.4)(1.0)
Total Noninterest Income$4,337.5
$3,946.1
$3,726.9
10 %6 %Total Noninterest Income$4,657.6 $4,395.2 $4,337.5 
Net Interest IncomeNet Interest Income1,443.2 1,677.9 1,622.7 
Total RevenueTotal Revenue$6,100.8 $6,073.1 $5,960.2 
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees
Trust, investmentInvestment and other servicing feesOther Servicing Fees were $3.75$4.00 billion in 20182020 compared with $3.43$3.85 billion in 2017. Trust, investment2019, and other servicing fees are based primarily on the market value of assets held in custody, managed andor serviced; the volume of transactions; securities lending volume and spreads; and fees for other services rendered. Certain market value calculations on which fees are based are performed on a monthly or quarterly basis in arrears. BasedLow-interest-rate environments have historically had a negative impact on an analysisfees earned on certain products.
Beginning in the second quarter of historical trends2020, the Corporation began to waive a portion of certain fees associated with money market mutual funds due to the current low-interest-rate environment. Northern Trust voluntarily waived $29.3 million of money market mutual fund fees for the year ended December 31, 2020, of which $23.6 million was waived in the fourth quarter of 2020, related to the low-interest-rate environment. These fee waivers, which are expected to continue in the low-interest-rate environment in which the yields in certain funds remain insufficient to pay the stated fees associated with such funds, will adversely impact Trust, Investment and currentOther Servicing Fees within the C&IS and Wealth Management reporting segments. Northern Trust did not waive any money market mutual fund fees due to interest rates in the year ended December 31, 2019.




34 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The components of Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees are provided in the following table.

TABLE 5: TRUST, INVESTMENT AND OTHER SERVICING FEES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
C&IS Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees
Custody and Fund Administration$1,586.1 $1,549.3 $1,501.1 2 %%
Investment Management511.1 445.7 436.8 15 
Securities Lending88.0 87.2 102.0 1 (15)
Other136.4 129.3 133.2 6 (3)
Total C&IS Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$2,321.6 $2,211.5 $2,173.1 5 %%
Wealth Management Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees
Central$607.3 $619.3 $607.8 (2)%%
East442.1 422.2 401.7 5 
West337.7 330.9 320.0 2 
Global Family Office286.3 268.2 251.1 7 
Total Wealth Management Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$1,673.4 $1,640.6 $1,580.6 2 %%
Total Consolidated Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,995.0 $3,852.1 $3,753.7 4 %%
Corporate & Institutional Services
C&IS Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees are primarily attributable to services related to custody, fund administration, investment management, and securities lending. Custody and fund administration fees, the largest component of C&IS fees, are driven primarily by values of client assets under custody/administration, transaction volumes and number of accounts. The asset values used to calculate these fees vary depending on the individual fee arrangements negotiated with each client. Custody fees related to asset values are client specific and product mix,are priced based on month-end market values, quarter-end market values, or the average of month-end market values for the quarter. The fund administration fees that are asset-value-related are priced using month-end, quarter-end, or average daily balances. Investment management estimates thatfees are based generally on market values of client assets under management throughout the period. Typically, the asset values used to calculate fee revenue are based on a 10% riseone-month or fallone-quarter lag.
Securities lending revenue is affected by market values; the demand for securities to be lent, which drives volumes; and the interest rate spread earned on the investment of cash deposited by investment firms as collateral for securities they have borrowed. The other services fee category in overall equity markets would cause a corresponding increase or decrease in Northern Trust’s trust,C&IS includes such products as investment risk and analytical services, benefit payments, and other servicingservices. Revenue from these products is based generally on the volume of services provided or a fixed fee.
Custody and fund administration fees increased from 2019 to 2020 primarily due to new business and favorable currency translation, partially offset by unfavorable non-U.S. markets. Investment management fees increased from 2019 to 2020 primarily due to new business and favorable markets, partially offset by money market mutual fund fee waivers.
The following tables provide a breakdown of approximately 3%the C&IS assets under custody and in total revenue of approximately 2%. For a more detailed discussion of 2018 trust, investmentunder management.

TABLE 6: C&IS ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
North America$5,746.4 $4,516.0 $3,693.4 27 %22 %
Europe, Middle East, and Africa3,478.2 2,998.5 2,538.6 16 18 
Asia Pacific976.2 820.3 589.2 19 39 
Securities Lending186.9 163.0 149.8 15 
Total Assets Under Custody$10,387.7 $8,497.8 $6,971.0 22 %22 %

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 35

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE 7: C&IS ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
North America$676.8 $588.4 $493.1 15 %19 %
Europe, Middle East, and Africa143.5 125.2 113.3 15 11 
Asia Pacific50.3 40.9 34.6 23 18 
Securities Lending186.9 163.0 149.8 15 
Total Assets Under Management$1,057.5 $917.5 $790.8 15 %16 %

Cash and other servicingassets deposited by investment firms as collateral for securities borrowed from custody clients are managed by Northern Trust and are included in assets under custody and under management. This securities lending collateral totaled $186.9 billion and $163.0 billion at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Wealth Management
Wealth Management fee income is calculated primarily based on market values and is impacted by both one-month and one-quarter lagged asset values. Wealth Management fees referincreased from 2019 to 2020, primarily due to favorable markets and new business, partially offset by money market mutual fund fee waivers. The following tables provide a summary of Wealth Management assets under custody and under management.

TABLE 8: WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Global Family Office$600.7 $474.1 $405.5 27 %17 %
Central120.0 115.1 88.2 4 31 
East89.1 81.7 72.7 9 12 
West65.3 64.8 56.5 1 15 
Total Assets Under Custody$875.1 $735.7 $622.9 19 %18 %

TABLE 9: WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Global Family Office$114.0 $94.2 $83.5 21 %13 %
Central109.3 104.4 96.2 5 
East73.3 66.8 57.0 10 17 
West51.2 48.4 41.9 6 16 
Total Assets Under Management$347.8 $313.8 $278.6 11 %13 %

The Wealth Management regions shown are comprised of the “Reporting Segmentsfollowing: Central includes Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio and Related Information” section.Wisconsin; East includes Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.; West includes Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Texas and Washington. Global Family Office provides specialized asset management, investment consulting, global custody, fiduciary, and private banking services to ultra-wealthy domestic and international clients.
When considering the impact of markets on the Corporation’s results, theMarket Indices
The following tables present selected market indices and the percentage changes year over year.year to provide context regarding equity and fixed income market impacts on the Corporation’s results.


TABLE 4:10: EQUITY MARKET INDICES
                        DAILY AVERAGES                       YEAR-END
2018
2017
CHANGE
2018
2017
CHANGE
DAILY AVERAGESYEAR-END
   20202019CHANGE20202019CHANGE
S&P 5002,746
2,448
12%2,507
2,674
(6)%S&P 5003,218 2,912 11 %3,756 3,231 16 %
MSCI EAFE (U.S. dollars)1,966
1,886
4
1,720
2,051
(16)MSCI EAFE (U.S. dollars)1,853 1,891 (2)2,148 2,037 5 
MSCI EAFE (local currency)1,125
1,105
2
1,008
1,164
(13)MSCI EAFE (local currency)1,074 1,118 (4)1,174 1,190 (1)
 






40   201836 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


TABLE 5:11: FIXED INCOME MARKET INDICES
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
20202019CHANGE
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index2,392 2,225 8 %
Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index559 512 9 
                        AS OF DECEMBER 31,
 2018
2017
CHANGE
    
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index2,047
2,046
 %
Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index479
485
(1)
    


Client Assets
ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY/ADMINISTRATION AND ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
Northern Trust, in the normal course of business, holds assets under custody/administration and management in a fiduciary or agency capacity for its clients. In accordance with GAAP, these assets are not assets of Northern Trust and are not included in its consolidated balance sheets. AUC/A and assets under management form the primary driversare a driver of our trust, investmentTrust, Investment and other servicing fees.Other Servicing Fees. For the purposes of disclosing AUC/A, to the extent that both custody and administration services are provided, the value of the assets is included only once.
At December 31, 2018,2020, AUC/A were $10.13 trillion, down 6%increased from $10.72 trillion at December 31, 2017. The decrease in AUC/A2019, primarily reflected unfavorablereflecting net inflows, favorable markets, the unfavorable impact of movements in foreign exchange rates, and net outflows.favorable currency translation. Assets under custody, a component of AUC/A, were $7.59 trillion at December 31, 2018, down 6%2020, increased from $8.08 trillion at December 31, 2017,2019, and included $4.70$7.42 trillion of global custody assets, compared to $4.94$5.89 trillion at December 31, 2017. 2019.
The decrease in assets under custody primarily reflected unfavorable markets, the unfavorable impact of movements in foreign exchange rates, and net outflows. Assets under management totaled $1.07 trillion, down 8% from $1.16 trillion at the end of 2017. The decrease primarily reflected unfavorable markets and net outflows.

following table presents AUC/A by reporting segment were as follows:segment.

TABLE 6:12: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY/ADMINISTRATION BY REPORTING SEGMENT
            DECEMBER 31,       CHANGEDECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2018
2017
2016
2015
2018 /2017
2017 /2016
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 /20192019 /2018
Corporate & Institutional$9,490.5
$10,066.8
$7,987.0
$7,279.7
(6)%26%
Corporate & Institutional ServicesCorporate & Institutional Services$13,653.1 $11,311.6 $9,490.5 21 %19 %
Wealth Management634.8
655.8
554.3
517.3
(3)18
Wealth Management879.4 738.8 634.8 19 16 
  
Total Assets Under Custody/Administration$10,125.3
$10,722.6
$8,541.3
$7,797.0
(6)%26%Total Assets Under Custody/Administration$14,532.5 $12,050.4 $10,125.3 21 %19 %
AssetsThe following table presents assets under custody, a component of AUC/A, by reporting segment were as follows:segment.

TABLE 7:13: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY BY REPORTING SEGMENT
            DECEMBER 31,      CHANGE
FIVE-YEAR
COMPOUND
GROWTH
RATE

DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2018 /2017
2017 / 2016
 ($ In Billions)2020201920182020 /20192019 / 2018
Corporate & Institutional$6,971.0
$7,439.1
$6,176.9
$5,565.8
$5,453.1
(6)%20%7%
Corporate & Institutional ServicesCorporate & Institutional Services$10,387.7 $8,497.8 $6,971.0 22 %22 %
Wealth Management622.9
645.5
543.6
506.3
515.7
(4)19
5
Wealth Management875.1 735.7 622.9 19 18 
   
Total Assets Under Custody$7,593.9
$8,084.6
$6,720.5
$6,072.1
$5,968.8
(6)%20%6%Total Assets Under Custody$11,262.8 $9,233.5 $7,593.9 22 %22 %

AssetsConsolidated assets under custody were invested as follows:increased from the prior year, primarily reflecting net inflows, favorable markets, and favorable currency translation.

The following table presents the investment allocation of Northern Trust’s custodied assets by reporting segment.

TABLE 8:14: ALLOCATION OF ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY BY INVESTMENT TYPE
DECEMBER 31,
                       DECEMBER 31,202020192018
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
C&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTAL
Equities45%47%46%44%45%Equities46 %62 %47 %45 %59 %46 %44 %54 %45 %
Fixed Income Securities37
35
36
37
36
Fixed Income Securities36 15 34 37 18 35 39 20 37 
Cash and Other Assets16
16
17
17
17
Cash and Other Assets16 23 17 16 23 17 15 26 16 
Securities Lending Collateral2
2
1
2
2
Securities Lending Collateral2  2 — — 



20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 4137

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The following table presents Northern Trust’s assets under custody by investment type.
AssetsTABLE 15: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY BY INVESTMENT TYPE
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Equities$5,293.9 $4,298.6 $3,379.5 23 %27 %
Fixed Income Securities3,870.9 3,236.5 2,822.4 20 15 
Cash and Other Assets1,911.1 1,535.3 1,242.1 24 24 
Securities Lending Collateral186.9 163.1 149.9 15 
Total Assets Under Custody$11,262.8 $9,233.5 $7,593.9 22 %22 %

The following table presents Northern Trust’s assets under management by reporting segment were as follows:segment.


TABLE 9:16: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY REPORTING SEGMENT
              DECEMBER 31,      CHANGE
FIVE-YEAR
COMPOUND
GROWTH
RATE

DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
 ($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Corporate & Institutional$790.8
$871.2
$694.0
$648.0
$709.6
(9)%26%4%
Corporate & Institutional ServicesCorporate & Institutional Services$1,057.5 $917.5 $790.8 15 %16 %
Wealth Management278.6
289.8
248.4
227.3
224.5
(4)17
5
Wealth Management347.8 313.8 278.6 11 13 
   
Total Assets Under Management$1,069.4
$1,161.0
$942.4
$875.3
$934.1
(8)%23%4%Total Assets Under Management$1,405.3 $1,231.3 $1,069.4 14 %15 %
Assets under management were investedat the end of 2020 increased from 2019. The increase primarily reflected favorable markets and managed as follows:net inflows.

The following tables present the investment allocation and management style of Northern Trust’s assets under management by reporting segment.
TABLE 10:17: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY INVESTMENT TYPE
DECEMBER 31,
                       DECEMBER 31,202020192018
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
C&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTAL
Equities50%51%51%51%52%Equities52 %52 %52 %53 %53 %53 %51 %47 %50 %
Fixed Income Securities17
16
17
17
17
Fixed Income Securities11 25 15 12 25 16 13 26 17 
Cash and Other Assets19
19
20
20
18
Cash and Other Assets19 23 20 17 22 18 17 27 19 
Securities Lending Collateral14
14
12
12
13
Securities Lending Collateral18  13 18 — 13 19 — 14 


TABLE 11:18: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY MANAGEMENT STYLE
DECEMBER 31,
202020192018
C&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTAL
Index58 %24 %50 %59 %27 %51 %57 %25 %49 %
Active38 39 38 37 36 37 38 39 38 
Multi-Manager4 8 5 
Other 29 7 — 29 — 29 




38 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
                        DECEMBER 31,
 2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Index49%46%47%47%49%
Active38
41
40
40
39
Multi-Manager5
5
5
4
6
Other8
8
8
9
6
Other Noninterest Income

The components of other noninterest income, and a discussion of significant changes during 2020 and 2019, are provided below.

TABLE 19: OTHER NONINTEREST INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Foreign Exchange Trading Income$290.4 $250.9 $307.2 16 %(18)%
Treasury Management Fees45.4 44.5 51.8 2 (14)
Security Commissions and Trading Income133.2 103.6 98.3 29 
Other Operating Income194.0 145.5 127.5 33 14 
Investment Security Gains (Losses), net(0.4)(1.4)(1.0)N/MN/M
Total Other Noninterest Income$662.6 $543.1 $583.8 22 %(7)%

Foreign Exchange Trading Income
Northern Trust provides foreign exchange services in the normal course of business as an integral part of its global custody services. Active management of currency positions, within conservative limits, also contributes to foreign exchange trading income. Foreign exchange trading incomeExchange Trading Income in 2018 totaled $307.2 million, up $97.3 million, or 46%, compared with $209.9 million in 2017,2020 increased from 2019, primarily resulting fromdriven by higher client volumes and increased market volatility, partially offset by lower foreign exchange swap activity in Treasury and higher volatility.Treasury.


Treasury Management Fees
Treasury management fees,Management Fees, generated from cash and treasury management products and services provided to clients, totaled $51.8 million in 2018, down 8%,2020 increased from $56.4 million in 2017, primarily due to an increase in the earnings credit rate applied to client balances.2019.


Security Commissions and Trading Income
Security commissionsCommissions and trading income isTrading Income, generated primarily from securities brokerage services provided by Northern Trust Securities, Inc., and totaled $98.3 million in 2018, up 10%, or $8.7 million,2020 increased from $89.6 million in 2017,2019, primarily due todriven by higher core brokerage revenuesrevenue and transition management revenues.revenue from interest rate swaps.


42   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



Other Operating Income
The components of other operating income include:Other Operating Income are provided in the following table.


TABLE 12:20: OTHER OPERATING INCOME
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGEFOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Loan Service Fees$48.9
$50.7
$56.6
(4)%(10)%Loan Service Fees$52.5 $48.0 $48.9 9 %(2)%
Banking Service Fees46.4
48.6
50.6
(5)(4)Banking Service Fees46.1 45.6 46.4 1 (2)
Other Income32.2
58.2
134.0
(44)(57)Other Income95.4 51.9 32.2 84 60 
 
Total Other Operating Income$127.5
$157.5
$241.2
(19)%(35)%Total Other Operating Income$194.0 $145.5 $127.5 33 %14 %
Other income totaled $32.2 million in 2018, down $26.0 million or 44%,2020 increased from $58.2 million in 2017,2019, primarily due to the impairment of a community development equity investment previously held at cost, expenseshigher income related to existing swap agreementsa bank-owned life insurance program implemented during 2019, a charge in the prior year related to Visa Inc. Class B common shares,the decision made to sell substantially all of the lease portfolio, and the net impact of various other operating income categories.higher miscellaneous income.


Investment Security Losses,Gains (Losses), Net
Net investment security losses totaled $1.0 million and $1.6 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively. Losses in 2018 and 2017 include $0.5 million and $0.22019 included $0.3 million of charges related to the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of certain Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) eligible held-to-maturity securities, respectively.

NONINTEREST INCOME – 2017 COMPARED WITH 2016
Trust, investment and other servicing fees were $3.43 billion in 2017, up 10% from $3.11 billion in 2016, primarily due to favorable markets, new business, and revenue associateddebt securities. ASU 2016-13, adopted on January 1, 2020, replaced the legacy OTTI model with the UBS acquisition. Foreign exchange trading income decreased 11% to $209.9 million in 2017 from $236.6 million in 2016, primarily resulting from lower volatility and client volumes in 2017.
Other operating income totaled $157.5 million in 2017, a decrease of 35% from $241.2 million in 2016. Other operating income in 2016 included a gain on the sale of 1.1 million Visa Inc. Class B common shares, net of a valuation adjustment to existing swap agreements, totaling $118.2 million, offset by impairment charges and aan estimated credit loss on sale relatedmodel. Refer to the decisioncaption "Investment Security Gains and Losses” in Note 4, “Securities,” and the caption “Allowance for Debt Securities Held to exit a portion of a non-strategic loanMaturity Securities Portfolio” in Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses” included under Item 8, “Financial Statements and lease portfolio, as well as impairment charges related to the residual value of certain aircraft and rail cars of $18.9 million.Supplementary Data.”
Net investment security losses totaled $1.6 million and $3.2 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. Losses in 2017 and 2016 include $0.2 million and $3.7 million of charges related to the OTTI of certain CRA eligible held-to-maturity securities, respectively.


2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 39

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net Interest Income is defined as the total of Interest Income and amortized fees on earning assets, less Interest Expense on deposits and borrowed funds, adjusted for the impact of interest-related hedging activity. Earning assets — including Federal Funds Sold, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell, Interest-Bearing Due From and Deposits with Banks, Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other, Securities, and Loans and Leases — are financed by a large base of interest-bearing funds that include client deposits, short-term borrowings, Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt. Short-term borrowings include Federal Funds Purchased, Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, and Other Borrowings. Earning assets also are funded by noninterest-related funds, which include demand deposits and Stockholders’ Equity. Net Interest Income is subject to variations in the level and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing funds and their relative sensitivity to interest incomerates. In addition, the levels of nonaccruing assets and client compensating deposit balances used to pay for services impact Net Interest Income.
Net interest margin is the difference between what we earn on our assets and what we pay for deposits and other sources of funding. The direction and level of interest rates are important factors in our earnings. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing annualized Net Interest Income by average interest-earning assets.
Net Interest Income stated on an FTE basis is a non-generally-accepted-accounting-principle (GAAP)non-GAAP financial measure that facilitates the analysis of asset yields. Management believes an FTE presentation provides a clearer indication of net interest margins for comparative purposes. When adjusted to an FTE basis, yields on taxable, nontaxable, and partially taxable assets are comparable; however, the adjustment to an FTE basis has no impact on net income.Net Income. A reconciliation of net interest incomeNet Interest Income on a GAAP basis to net interest incomeNet Interest Income on an FTE basis is provided on page 88.85.





201840 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation43

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


AnThe following tables present an analysis of netaverage daily balances and interest income onrates affecting Net Interest Income and an FTE basis, major balance sheet components impacting net interest income and related ratios are provided below.analysis of Net Interest Income changes.


TABLE 13:21: AVERAGE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS WITH ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME (FTE)
(INTEREST AND RATE ON A FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)(1)
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
Interest Income – GAAP$2,321.4
$1,769.4
$1,416.9
31 %25 %
FTE Adjustment41.2
45.8
25.1
(10)82
      
Interest Income – FTE2,362.6
1,815.2
1,442.0
30
26
Interest Expense698.7
340.2
182.0
105
87
      
Net Interest Income – FTE Adjusted1,663.9
1,475.0
1,260.0
13
17
      
Net Interest Income – GAAP1,622.7
1,429.2
1,234.9
14
16
      
AVERAGE BALANCE     
Earning Assets$113,731.0
$111,178.3
$107,037.6
2 %4 %
Interest-Related Funds88,638.4
83,422.0
76,886.0
6
9
Net Noninterest-Related Funds25,092.6
27,756.3
30,151.6
(10)(8)
      
    CHANGE IN PERCENTAGE
AVERAGE RATE     
Earning Assets2.08%1.63%1.35%0.45
0.28
Interest-Related Funds0.79
0.41
0.24
0.38
0.17
Interest Rate Spread1.29
1.22
1.11
0.07
0.11
Total Source of Funds0.62
0.31
0.17
0.31
0.14
Net Interest Margin – GAAP1.43%1.29%1.15%0.14
0.14
Net Interest Margin – FTE1.46%1.33%1.18%0.13
0.15
202020192018
($ In Millions)INTERESTAVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATE(7)
INTERESTAVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATE(7)
INTERESTAVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATE(7)
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other(2)
$28.8 $27,921.4 0.10 %$181.7 $18,527.7 0.98 %$207.1 $23,899.3 0.87 %
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(3)
22.4 5,400.8 0.41 72.4 5,996.7 1.21 70.0 6,022.8 1.16 
Federal Funds Sold 2.3 1.37 0.4 12.8 2.73 0.4 20.5 2.18 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell3.9 1,253.1 0.31 17.5 835.0 2.10 32.9 1,478.3 2.22 
Securities
U.S. Government63.0 4,256.7 1.48 110.4 5,296.5 2.09 108.3 5,737.1 1.89 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions48.2 2,194.3 2.20 24.4 980.5 2.49 13.9 725.2 1.91 
Government Sponsored Agency409.0 23,970.4 1.71 583.6 22,634.1 2.58 456.0 20,682.7 2.20 
Other(4)
324.1 25,635.1 1.26 381.6 21,773.3 1.75 367.5 23,136.5 1.59 
Total Securities844.3 56,056.5 1.51 1,100.0 50,684.4 2.17 945.7 50,281.5 1.88 
Loans and Leases(5)
778.5 33,498.8 2.32 1,160.7 31,052.8 3.74 1,106.5 32,028.6 3.45 
Total Interest-Earning Assets1,677.9 124,132.9 1.35 2,532.7 107,109.4 2.36 2,362.6 113,731.0 2.08 
Allowance for Credit Losses (178.0) — (111.4)— — (126.3)— 
Cash and Due from Banks and Other Central Bank Deposits(6)
 2,603.0  — 2,393.6 — — 2,534.3 — 
Buildings and Equipment 509.3  — 425.6 — — 438.5 — 
Client Security Settlement Receivables 1,357.5  — 1,070.4 — — 1,002.0 — 
Goodwill 695.4  — 682.5 — 642.5 — 
Other Assets 7,691.0  — 5,981.3 — — 4,724.6 — 
Total Assets$ $136,811.1  %$— $117,551.4 — %$— $122,946.6 — %
AVERAGE SOURCE OF FUNDS
Deposits
Savings, Money Market, and Other$47.6 $23,396.4 0.20 %$160.8 $16,577.8 0.97 %$82.0 $15,149.3 0.54 %
Savings Certificates and Other Time16.5 1,266.4 1.30 16.2 867.5 1.86 7.8 870.6 0.90 
Non-U.S. Offices – Interest-Bearing(15.7)60,486.3 (0.03)311.9 54,885.2 0.57 294.8 58,556.6 0.50 
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits48.4 85,149.1 0.06 488.9 72,330.5 0.68 384.6 74,576.5 0.52 
Federal Funds Purchased2.2 980.9 0.22 25.9 1,267.4 2.05 50.3 2,762.8 1.82 
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase1.0 218.3 0.47 6.4 339.0 1.89 7.8 525.2 1.48 
Other Borrowings45.3 6,401.1 0.71 181.7 7,752.5 2.34 150.1 7,495.5 2.00 
Senior Notes72.7 3,233.8 2.24 72.6 2,389.1 3.04 53.4 1,704.0 3.13 
Long-Term Debt26.5 1,189.2 2.24 38.3 1,139.0 3.36 45.0 1,296.8 3.47 
Floating Rate Capital Debt4.2 277.7 1.52 8.2 277.6 2.98 7.5 277.6 2.72 
Total Interest-Related Funds200.3 97,450.1 0.21 822.0 85,495.1 0.96 698.7 88,638.4 0.79 
Interest Rate Spread  1.14 — — 1.40 — — 1.29 
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits 23,362.0  — 17,455.5 — — 20,526.6 — 
Other Liabilities 4,806.4  — 3,952.4 — — 3,552.7 — 
Stockholders’ Equity 11,192.6  — 10,648.4 — — 10,228.9 — 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$ $136,811.1  %$— $117,551.4 — %$— $122,946.6 — %
Net Interest Income/Margin (FTE Adjusted)$1,477.6 $ 1.19 %$1,710.7 $— 1.60 %$1,663.9 $— 1.46 %
Net Interest Income/Margin (Unadjusted)$1,443.2 $ 1.16 %$1,677.9 $— 1.57 %$1,622.7 $— 1.43 %

ReferNote: Net Interest Income (FTE Adjusted), a non-GAAP financial measure, includes adjustments to pages 168a fully taxable equivalent basis for loans and 169 for additional analysissecurities. The adjustments are based on a federal income tax rate of net interest income.

Net interest income21.0%, where the rate is defined as the total of interest income and amortized fees on earning assets, less interest expense on deposits and borrowed funds, adjusted for the impactapplicable state income taxes, net of interest-related hedging activity. Earning assets – includingrelated federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreementstax benefit. Total taxable equivalent interest adjustments amounted to resell, interest-bearing due from banks$34.4 million in 2020, $32.8 million in 2019 and interest-bearing deposits with banks, Federal Reserve$41.2 million in 2018. A reconciliation of Net Interest Income and other central bank deposits, securities, and loans and leases – are financed by a large base of interest-bearing funds that include client deposits, short-term borrowings, senior notes and long-term debt. Earning assets also are funded by net noninterest-related funds, which include demand deposits, and stockholders’ equity, reduced by nonearning assets such as noninterest-bearing cash and due from banks, items in process of collection, and buildings and equipment. Net interest income is subject to variations in the level and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing funds and their relative sensitivity to interest rates. In addition, the levels of nonperforming assets and client compensating deposit balances used to pay for services impact net interest income.
Net interest income in 2018 was $1.62 billion, up $193.5 million, or 14%, from $1.43 billion in 2017. Net interest income on an FTE basis for 2018 was $1.66 billion, an increase of $188.9 million, or 13%, from $1.48 billion in 2017, due to an increased net interest margin and higher levels of average earning assets. Average earning assets increased $2.6 billion, or 2%,on a GAAP basis to $113.7 billion in 2018 from $111.2 billion in 2017. The net interest margin in 2018 was 1.43%, up from 1.29% in 2017. TheNet Interest Income and net interest margin on an FTE basis (each of which is a non-GAAP financial measure) is provided on page 85. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing annualized Net Interest Income by average interest-earning assets. Interest revenue on cash collateral positions is reported above in 2018 was 1.46%, up from 1.33%Interest-Bearing Due From and Deposits with Banks and in 2017.
GrowthLoans and Leases. Interest Expense on cash collateral positions is reported above in average earning assets primarily reflected higher levels of securities, partially offset by reductions in loans and leases and interest-bearing dueNon-U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing Deposits. Related cash collateral received from and deposited with derivative counterparties is recorded net of the associated derivative contract in Other Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively.
(1) Northern Trust’s non-U.S. activities are primarily related to its asset servicing, asset management, foreign exchange, cash management, and commercial banking businesses. The operations of Northern Trust are managed on a reporting segment basis and include components of both U.S and non-U.S. source income and assets. Non-U.S. source income and assets are not separately identified in Northern Trust’s internal management reporting system. However, Northern Trust is required to disclose non-U.S. activities based on the domicile of the customer. Due to the complex and integrated nature of Northern Trust’s activities, it is difficult to segregate with precision revenues, expenses and assets between U.S. and non-U.S.-domiciled customers. On the basis of averages, the percentage of total assets attributable to foreign activities was 20%, 23% and 25% as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. On the basis of averages, the percentage of total liabilities attributable to foreign activities was 56%, 53% and 54% as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. For additional information, refer to the Geographic Area Information section of Note 32, “Reporting Segments and Related Information,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
(2) Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other includes collateral deposits with banks. Securities, inclusivecertain securities depositories and clearing houses, which are classified in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
(3) Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks includes the interest-bearing component of Federal ReserveCash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks as presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
(4) Other securities include certain community development investments and Federal Home Loan Bank stock and certain community development investmentsFederal Reserve stock, which are classified in other assets inOther Assets on the consolidated balance sheets, averaged $50.3 billion, an increasesheets.
(5) Average balances include nonaccrual loans. Lease financing receivable balances are reduced by deferred income.
(6) Cash and Due from Banks and Other Central Bank Deposits includes the noninterest-bearing component of $5.6 billion, or 12%, from $44.7 billionFederal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits on the consolidated balance sheets.
(7) Rate calculations are based on actual balances rather than the rounded amounts presented in 2017. Loans and leases averaged $32.0 billion, a decreasethe Average Consolidated Balance Sheets with Analysis of $1.6 billion, or 5%, from $33.6 billion in 2017. Interest-bearing due from and deposits with banks averaged $6.0 billion in 2018, down $1.1 billion, or 16%, from $7.1 billion in 2017.
The increase in average earning assets was primarily funded by higher levels of short-term borrowings and interest-bearing deposits, partially offset by reductions of demand and other noninterest-bearing deposits. Average short-term borrowings increased $4.1 billion, or 61%, to $10.8 billion in 2018 from $6.7 billion in 2017. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $1.2 billion, or 2%, to $74.6 billion in 2018 from $73.4 billion in 2017. Average demand and other noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $2.6 billion, or 11%, to $20.5 billion in 2018 from $23.1 billion in 2017.

Net Interest Income.
44   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation41


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

TABLE 22: ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME CHANGES DUE TO VOLUME AND RATE
(INTEREST AND RATE ON A FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)2020/2019 CHANGE DUE TO2019/2018 CHANGE DUE TO
(In Millions)AVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATENET (DECREASE) INCREASEAVERAGE
BALANCE
 AVERAGE RATENET (DECREASE) INCREASE
Increase (Decrease) in Net Interest Income (FTE)
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other$62.5 $(215.4)$(152.9)$(58.1)$32.7 $(25.4)
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(6.5)(43.5)(50.0)(0.3)2.7 2.4 
Federal Funds Sold(0.2)(0.2)(0.4)— — — 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell6.1 (19.7)(13.6)(36.5)21.1 (15.4)
Securities
U.S. Government(19.0)(28.4)(47.4)(5.4)7.5 2.1 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions26.9 (3.1)23.8 5.7 4.8 10.5 
Government Sponsored Agency32.7 (207.3)(174.6)45.1 82.5 127.6 
Other61.6 (119.1)(57.5)(20.0)34.1 14.1 
Total Securities102.2 (357.9)(255.7)25.4 128.9 154.3 
Loans and Leases177.6 (559.8)(382.2)(89.2)143.4 54.2 
Total Interest Income$341.7 $(1,196.5)$(854.8)$(158.7)$328.8 $170.1 
Interest-Bearing Deposits
Savings, Money Market and Other$48.5 $(161.7)$(113.2)$8.3 $70.5 $78.8 
Savings Certificates and Other Time(9.3)9.6 0.3 — 8.4 8.4 
Non-U.S. Offices - Interest Bearing29.2 (356.8)(327.6)(13.9)31.0 17.1 
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits68.4 (508.9)(440.5)(5.6)109.9 104.3 
Federal Funds Purchased(4.8)(18.9)(23.7)(31.9)7.5 (24.4)
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase(1.7)(3.7)(5.4)(6.5)5.1 (1.4)
Other Borrowings(27.3)(109.1)(136.4)5.3 26.3 31.6 
Senior Notes22.0 (21.9)0.1 20.6 (1.4)19.2 
Long-Term Debt13.5 (25.3)(11.8)(5.6)(1.1)(6.7)
Floating Rate Capital Debt (4.0)(4.0)— 0.7 0.7 
Total Interest Expense$70.1 $(691.8)$(621.7)$(23.7)$147.0 $123.3 
(Decrease) Increase in Net Interest Income (FTE)$271.6 $(504.7)$(233.1)$(135.0)$181.8 $46.8 
Note: Changes not due solely to average balance changes or rate changes are allocated proportionately to average balanceandrate based on their relative absolute magnitudes.

Net Interest Income in 2020 decreased from 2019. Net Interest Income, stated on an FTE basis decreased from 2019, due to a lower net interest margin, partially offset by higher levels of average earning assets. Average earning assets increased in 2020 from 2019, primarily reflecting higher levels of short-term interest bearing deposits, Securities, and Loans and Leases. Funding of the balance sheet reflected higher levels of client deposits. The increase in average client deposits resulted from the large inflows experienced at the end of the first quarter of 2020, and these balances were largely maintained throughout the year.
The net interest margin in 2020 decreased from 2019. The net interest margin on an FTE basis in 2020 decreased from 2019, primarily due to lower interest rates. Low levels of market interest rates are expected to continue to impact our net interest income.
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other averaged $27.9 billion in 2020, which increased $9.4 billion, or 51%, from $18.5 billion in 2019, which resulted from significant deposit inflows. The higher level of client deposits were primarily placed with the Federal Reserve and other central banks and in the securities portfolio. Average Securities were $56.1 billion and increased $5.4 billion, or 11%, from $50.7 billion in the prior-year period and include certain community development investments, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and Federal Reserve stock of $769.6 million, $202.9 million and $63.5 million, respectively, which are recorded in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Average taxable Securities were $50.9 billion in 2020 and $43.9 billion in 2019. Average nontaxable Securities, which represent securities that are primarily exempt from U.S. federal and state income taxes, were $5.2 billion in 2020 and $6.8 billion in 2019. Interest-Bearing Due From and Deposits with Banks averaged $5.4 billion in 2020 and $6.0 billion in 2019.



42 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Loans and Leases averaged $33.5 billion, which increased $2.4 billion, or 8%, from $31.1 billion in 2019, primarily reflecting higher levels of commercial and institutional, private client, commercial real estate, and non-U.S. loans, partially offset by a decrease in residential real estate loans. Commercial and institutional loans averaged $10.3 billion and increased $1.3 billion, or 15%, from $9.0 billion for the prior-year period. Private client loans averaged $11.5 billion and increased $706.9 million, or 7%, from $10.7 billion for the prior-year period. Commercial real estate loans averaged $3.3 billion and increased $335.6 million, or 12%, from $2.9 billion for the prior-year period. Non-U.S. loans averaged $2.0 billion and increased $262.7 million, or 15.3%, from $1.7 billion for the prior-year period. Residential real estate loans averaged $6.1 billion and decreased $180.9 million, or 3%, from $6.3 billion for the prior-year period.
Northern Trust utilizes a diverse mix of funding sources. Average Interest-Bearing Deposits increased $12.8 billion, or 18%, to $85.1 billion in 2020 from $72.3 billion in 2019. Average Interest-Related Funds increased $12.0 billion, or 14%, to $97.5 billion in 2020 from $85.5 billion in 2019. The balances within short-term borrowing classifications vary based on funding requirements and strategies, interest rate levels, changes in the volume of lower-cost deposit sources, and the availability of collateral to secure these borrowings. Average net noninterest-related funds increased $5.1 billion, or 23%, to $26.7 billion in 2020 from $21.6 billion in 2019, primarily resulting from higher levels of Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits and Other Liabilities, partially offset by Other Assets. Average Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits increased $5.9 billion, or 34%, to $23.4 billion in 2020 from $17.5 billion in 2019. The average rate on total source of funds was 0.16% in 2020 and 0.77% in 2019.
Interest expense for Interest-Bearing Deposits in the current year was driven by low and negative interest rates for Non-U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing Deposits and low interest rates on domestic Interest-Bearing Deposits. Average Non-U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing Deposits comprised 71% of total average Interest-Bearing Deposits for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Stockholders’ equityEquity averaged $10.2$11.2 billion in 2018,2020, compared with $10.0$10.6 billion in 2017.2019. The increaseincreased Stockholders’ Equity of $248.3$544.2 million, or 2%5%, was primarily attributable to current-year earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income since the prior-year period, partially offset by the repurchase of common stock pursuant to the Corporation’s share repurchase program, the redemption of preferred stock during the first quarter of 2020, and dividend declarations. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, the Corporation increasedmaintained its quarterly common stock dividend by 31% to $0.55at $0.70 per share and repurchased 9.03,276,589 shares of common stock, returning $891.8 million shares, returning $1.4 billion in capital to common stockholders, compared to $895.6$1.7 billion in 2019.
In July 2018, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase authorization to repurchase up to 25.0 million in 2017.
Undershares of the Corporation’s 2018 Capital Plan, which was reviewed without objectioncommon stock. Shares are repurchased by the Corporation to, among other things, manage the Corporation’s capital levels. Repurchased shares are used for general purposes, including the issuance of shares under stock option and other incentive plans. The Corporation suspended this program on March 16, 2020. Subsequent to the Corporation suspending its open-market share repurchase program, the only shares repurchased were shares of common stock withheld upon the vesting of share-based compensation to satisfy tax withholding obligations.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, the Federal Reserve announced certain measures to ensure that large financial institutions, including Northern Trust, remain resilient despite the economic uncertainty resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, for the third and fourth quarters of 2020, no share repurchases were permitted by these institutions and dividend payments were limited to the amount paid in the second quarter and could not exceed the payor’s average net income for the four preceding quarters. On December 18, 2020, the Federal Reserve again extended its capital distribution limits into the first quarter of 2021 with certain modifications, which include continuing to limit dividend payments based on recent income and limiting share repurchases based on recent income. During the first quarter of 2021, the Corporation may repurchase up to $529.5 million of common stock after December 31, 2018, through June 2019.
For additional analysis of average balances and interest rate changes affecting net interest income, refer to the Average Balance Sheets with Analysis of Net Interest Income included in “Supplemental Item – Selected Statistical and Supplemental Financial Data.”

NET INTEREST INCOME – 2017 COMPARED WITH 2016
Net interest income on an FTE basis increased 17% to $1.48 billion in 2017 from $1.26 billion in 2016, reflecting higher levels of average earning assets and an increased net interest margin. Average earning assets increased $4.1 billion, or 4%, to $111.2 billion in 2017 from $107.0 billion in 2016, primarily reflecting higher levels of securities and short-term interest-bearing deposits, partially offset by reductions in loans and leases. The net interest margin on an FTE basis increased to 1.33% in 2017 from 1.18% in 2016, primarily due to an increase in short-term interest rates.
Stockholders’ equity averaged $10.0 billion in 2017, compared with $9.1 billion in 2016. The increase in 2017 was attributable to prior-year earnings, partially offset by the repurchase of common stock pursuant to the Corporation’srestarted its share repurchase program in accordance with such limitations. The repurchase authorization approved by the Board of Directors has no expiration date, thus the Corporation retains the ability to resume repurchases thereunder when circumstances warrant and dividend declarations.applicable regulations permit. Please refer to Note 15, “Stockholders’ Equity,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 43

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision forCorporation adopted ASU No. 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, which significantly changed the way impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of financial instruments. For more information on the adoption of ASU 2016-13, please refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The Provision for Credit Losses was a provision of $125.0 million in 2020, as compared to a credit provision of $14.5 million in 2018 compared2019. The provision for 2020 primarily reflected an increase in the reserve evaluated on a collective basis. The increase in the collective basis reserve was primarily driven by current and projected economic conditions and downgrades in the portfolio, both resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts, with aincreases primarily in the commercial and institutional and commercial real estate portfolios. The prior-year credit provision of $28.0 million in 2017, and a credit provision of $26.0 million in 2016. The current-year provision primarily reflected reductionsa decrease in the inherent reserve related to the residential real estate portfolio due to a reduction in outstanding loans and undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit and improved credit quality acrossand reductions to the portfolio. This was partially offset by increases in specific reserves primarilyreserve related to the commercial and institutional portfolio. Nonperformingand residential real estate portfolios, partially offset by an increase in the inherent reserve related to the private client portfolio due to an increase in outstanding loans and lower credit quality.
Net charge-offs in 2020 totaled $3.2 million resulting from $9.7 million of charge-offs and $6.5 million of recoveries, compared to net recoveries of $0.7 million in the prior-year resulting from $6.5 million of charge-offs and $7.2 million of recoveries.
Nonaccrual assets at December 31, 2018 decreased 24%2020 increased 53% from the prior year-end. Residential real estate, commercial commercial real estate, commercial and non-U.S.institutional, and private client loans accounted for 87%47%, 6%31%, 6%20%, and 1%2%, respectively, of nonperformingnonaccrual loans and leases at December 31, 2018.2020. Residential real estate, commercial and institutional, commercial real estate, private client, and non-U.S. loans accounted for 85%, 9%, 4%, 1%, and 1%, respectively, of total nonaccrual loans and leases at December 31, 2019. For furtheradditional discussion of the allowance and provisionAllowance for credit losses for 2018, 2017, and 2016,Credit Losses, refer to the “Asset Quality” section.


Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expenseExpense for 2018 totaled $4.02 billion, up $247.5 million, or 7%,2020 increased from $3.77 billion in 2017,2019, primarily reflecting increased compensation, outside services, equipmentCompensation, Equipment and software expense,Software, Employee Benefits, Occupancy, and employee benefits expense. The current year included higher third-party advisor costs due to a change in presentation resulting from the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard and higher expenses associated with the UBS acquisition,Other Operating Expense, partially offset by lower Outside Services. Noninterest Expense for 2020 included severance-related charges. The prior year also included a one-time employee cash bonus recordedcharges of $55.0 million in connection with the Tax Cutsa reduction in force, a $43.4 million charge related to a corporate action processing error, and Jobs Act.

Occupancy expense related to an early lease exit arising from a workplace real estate strategy of $11.9 million.
The components of noninterest expenseNoninterest Expense and a discussion of significant changes during 20182020 and 20172019 are provided below.

TABLE 14:23: NONINTEREST EXPENSE
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGEFOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Compensation$1,806.9
$1,733.7
$1,541.1
4 %13 %Compensation$1,947.1 $1,859.0 $1,806.9 5 %%
Employee Benefits356.7
319.9
293.3
12
9
Employee Benefits387.7 355.2 356.7 9 — 
Outside Services739.4
668.4
627.1
11
7
Outside Services763.1 774.5 739.4 (1)
Equipment and Software582.2
524.0
467.4
11
12
Equipment and Software673.5 612.1 582.2 10 
Occupancy201.1
191.8
177.4
5
8
Occupancy230.1 212.9 201.1 8 
Other Operating Expense330.6
331.6
364.4

(9)Other Operating Expense346.7 329.8 330.6 5 — 
  
Total Noninterest Expense$4,016.9
$3,769.4
$3,470.7
7 %9 %Total Noninterest Expense$4,348.2 $4,143.5 $4,016.9 5 %%


Compensation
Compensation expense, the largest component of noninterest expense, totaled $1.81 billionNoninterest Expense, increased in 2018, up $73.2 million, or 4%, compared to $1.73 billion in 2017,2020 from 2019, primarily reflecting increases due to higher salary expense driven by staff growth and base pay adjustments, $52.5 million of severance-related charges in connection with a reduction in force, and a one-time supplemental payment to certain employees in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by lower cash-based incentives and long-term performance-based incentive expense. Staff on a full-time equivalent basis totaled approximately 20,900 at December 31, 2020, up 6% from approximately 19,800 at December 31, 2019.
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits expense in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting higher cash-based incentive

retirement plan expenses.



201844 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation45

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


compensation, partially offset by lower severance-related charges and a one-time employee cash bonus recorded in the prior year in connection with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The increase in salary expense was primarily driven by base pay adjustments. Staff on a full-time equivalent basis totaled approximately 18,800 at December 31, 2018, up 4% from approximately 18,100 at December 31, 2017.

Employee Benefits
Employee benefits expense totaled $356.7 million in 2018, up $36.8 million, or 12%, from $319.9 million in 2017 reflecting higher retirement plan expenses, medical expenses, and payroll taxes, partially offset by lower severance-related charges.

Outside Services
Outside Services expense in 2020 decreased from 2019, primarily due to lower data processing and consulting services, expense totaled $739.4partially offset by higher sub-custodian expenses. Included in Outside Services is $2.5 million in 2018, up $71.0 million, or 11%, from $668.4 million in 2017, primarily reflecting a change in presentation of third-party advisor costs resulting from the adoption of the new revenue recognition accounting standard, increasedoutplacement costs associated with the UBS acquisition, higher technical services costs, increased restructuring charges, and higher subcustodian expense, partially offset by lower consulting services. There is a corresponding increase to trust, investment, and other servicing fees as a result of the adoption of the new revenue recognition accounting standard.

reduction in force.
Equipment and Software
Equipment and softwareSoftware expense comprised ofin 2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting higher depreciation and amortization rental, and maintenance costs, increased $58.2 million, or 11%, to $582.2 million in 2018 compared to $524.0 million in 2017, reflecting increased software amortization and higher software-related charges.

support costs.
Occupancy
Occupancy expense totaled $201.1 million in 2018, up $9.3 million, or 5%,2020 increased from $191.8 million in 2017,2019, primarily reflecting accelerated depreciationhigher rent arising from workplace real estate strategies, including $11.9 million of expense related to an early lease exit, partially offset by an asset retirement obligation reduction resulting from a previously-announced facility exit.

lease renegotiation.
Other Operating Expense
Other operating expense in 2018 totaled $330.6 million, down $1.0 million from $331.6 million in 2017. The components of other operating expenseOther Operating Expense are as follows:provided in the following table.

TABLE 15:24: OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGEFOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Business Promotion$98.3
$95.4
$83.6
3 %14 %Business Promotion$59.2 $104.2 $98.3 (43)%%
Staff RelatedStaff Related29.4 42.8 33.6 (31)27 
FDIC Insurance Premiums27.4
34.7
31.7
(21)9
FDIC Insurance Premiums11.8 9.9 27.4 19 (64)
Staff Related33.6
42.8
43.0
(22)(1)
Other Intangibles Amortization17.4
11.4
8.8
52
30
Other Intangibles Amortization16.9 16.6 17.4 2 (4)
Other Expenses153.9
147.3
197.3
4
(25)Other Expenses229.4 156.3 153.9 47 
  
Total Other Operating Expense$330.6
$331.6
$364.4
 %(9)%Total Other Operating Expense$346.7 $329.8 $330.6 5 %— %


Other operating expenseOperating Expense in the current year increased compared to the prior year reflects lower staff-related expense and FDIC deposit protection expense from the prior-year, offset by higher intangibles amortization driven by the UBS acquisition and increased other expenses driven primarily by higher expense associated with account servicing activities.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE – 2017 COMPARED WITH 2016
Noninterest expense in 2017 totaled $3.77 billion, up 9% from $3.47 billion in 2016, primarily reflecting increased compensation, equipment and software expense, and outside services expense. Results for 2017 included higher severance-related charges, expenses associated with the UBS acquisition, anddue to a one-time employee cash bonus. Results for 2016 included charges relating to certain securities lending litigation, contractual modifications associated with certain existing asset servicing clients, and severance and other personnel related charges.
Compensation expense increased 13% to $1.73 billion in 2017 from $1.54 billion in 2016, reflecting higher salary expense, performance-based incentive compensation, severance-related charges, a one-time employee cash bonus recorded in 2017, and expense associated with the UBS acquisition. The increase in salary expense was driven by staff growth and base-pay adjustments.

46   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Employee benefits expense totaled $319.9$43.4 million in 2017, up 9% from $293.3 million in 2016, reflecting increases in payroll taxes, medical expense, severance-related charges, expense associated with the UBS acquisition and payroll taxes on a one-time employee cash bonus recorded in 2017.
Outside services expense totaled $668.4 million in 2017, up 7% from $627.1 million in 2016, reflecting an increase in technical services, subcustodian expense, expense associated with the UBS acquisition, and severance-related charges.
Equipment and software expense increased 12% to $524.0 million in 2017 compared to $467.4 million in 2016, reflecting increased software amortization, software support costs, computer maintenance and rental costs, and expense associated with the UBS acquisition.
Occupancy expense for 2017 was $191.8 million, up 8% from $177.4 million in 2016, primarily reflecting accelerated depreciation expensecharge related to a previously-announced facility exit, higher rent expense, and higher costs associated with the UBS acquisition.
Other operating expense totaled $331.6 millioncorporate action processing error as well as increases in 2017, down 9% from $364.4 million in 2016, primarily due to charges recorded in 2016 relating to certain securities lending litigation and contractual modifications associated with existing C&IS clients,mutual fund co-administration fees, partially offset by increases in expense in 2017 related to higherlower business promotion expense driven by increased costs associated with the Northern Trust-sponsored PGA TOUR golf tournament,due to reduced business travel and higher charges associated with account servicing activities, supplemental compensation plans, and costs associated with the UBS acquisition.lower staff-related expense.


Provision for Income TaxesWealth Management
Provisions forWealth Management fee income taxis calculated primarily based on market values and effective tax rates areis impacted by levels of pre-tax income as well as nonrecurring items such as the resolution of tax mattersboth one-month and changes in income tax ratesone-quarter lagged asset values. Wealth Management fees increased from 2019 to 2020, primarily due to favorable markets and tax laws. The 2018 provision for income taxes was $401.4 million, representing an effective rate of 20.5%. This compares with a provision for income taxes of $434.9 million and an effective rate of 26.6% in 2017.
The current year includes tax benefits primarily attributable to the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% as a result of the TCJA enacted in the fourth quarter of 2017, a tax benefit recognized in 2018 resulting from a change in accounting method regarding the timing of tax deductions for software-related expenses, and adjustments recorded in the current year associated with the implementation of the TCJA as outlined below. These decreases to the provision for income taxes in the current year werenew business, partially offset by money market mutual fund fee waivers. The following tables provide a summary of Wealth Management assets under custody and under management.

TABLE 8: WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Global Family Office$600.7 $474.1 $405.5 27 %17 %
Central120.0 115.1 88.2 4 31 
East89.1 81.7 72.7 9 12 
West65.3 64.8 56.5 1 15 
Total Assets Under Custody$875.1 $735.7 $622.9 19 %18 %

TABLE 9: WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Global Family Office$114.0 $94.2 $83.5 21 %13 %
Central109.3 104.4 96.2 5 
East73.3 66.8 57.0 10 17 
West51.2 48.4 41.9 6 16 
Total Assets Under Management$347.8 $313.8 $278.6 11 %13 %

The Wealth Management regions shown are comprised of the impact of an increase infollowing: Central includes Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio and Wisconsin; East includes Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.; West includes Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Texas and Washington. Global Family Office provides specialized asset management, investment consulting, global custody, fiduciary, and private banking services to ultra-wealthy domestic and international clients.
Market Indices
The following tables present selected market indices and the percentage changes year over year to provide context regarding equity and fixed income before income taxes, tax accounting changes in 2018 brought about by the TCJA including the tax accounting associated with additional non-deductible expenses, and a reduction in the income tax benefit derived from the vesting of restricted stock units and stock option exercises. Also included in the 2017 tax provision were Federal and State research tax credits related tomarket impacts on the Corporation’s technology spend between 2013 and 2016.results.
The TCJA was enacted on December 22, 2017, and reduced the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. It also required companies to pay a mandatory deemed repatriation tax on earnings of foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred. At December 31, 2017, Northern Trust made a reasonable estimate as to the impact of the TCJA. During 2018, Northern Trust completed the related calculations and additional analyses associated with the implementation of the TCJA, resulting in a number of adjustments to the 2018 tax provision as follows:

TABLE 10: EQUITY MARKET INDICES
TABLE 16: IMPACT OF TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT
DAILY AVERAGESYEAR-END
20202019CHANGE20202019CHANGE
S&P 5003,218 2,912 11 %3,756 3,231 16 %
MSCI EAFE (U.S. dollars)1,853 1,891 (2)2,148 2,037 5 
MSCI EAFE (local currency)1,074 1,118 (4)1,174 1,190 (1)
(In Millions)2018
2017
Federal Taxes on Mandatory Deemed Repatriation$(16.8)$150.0
Impact Related to Federal Deferred Taxes12.7
(210.0)
Other Adjustments(0.7)6.9
   
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes$(4.8)$(53.1)

Adjustments in the above table include a tax benefit of $16.8 million resulting from an adjustment to the Corporation’s 2017 income tax provision for mandatory deemed repatriation with respect to the pre-2018 earnings of its non-US subsidiaries, offset by a $12.7 million net provision associated with the repricing of deferred taxes.
The income tax provision of $434.9 million for 2017 represented an effective tax rate of 26.6%, and reflects reductions totaling $50.0 million related to certain non-U.S. subsidiaries whose earnings were reinvested indefinitely outside of the United States. As a result of the TCJA enacted in the fourth quarter of 2017, these earnings and the earnings from prior years which have been reinvested indefinitely outside of the United States are deemed to have been repatriated to the United States and subject to a repatriation tax. As of December 31, 2018, Northern Trust’s repatriation tax has been estimated to be $133.2 million.





201836 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation47

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


TABLE 11: FIXED INCOME MARKET INDICES
The 2016 income tax provision of $484.6 million represented an effective tax rate of 31.9%, and reflects reductions of $50.1 million related to certain non-U.S. subsidiaries whose earnings were reinvested indefinitely outside the United States.
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
20202019CHANGE
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index2,392 2,225 8 %
Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index559 512 9 

REPORTING SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATIONClient Assets
Northern Trust, is organized aroundin the normal course of business, holds assets under custody/administration and management in a fiduciary or agency capacity for its two client-focused reporting segments: C&ISclients. In accordance with GAAP, these assets are not assets of Northern Trust and Wealth Management. Assetare not included in its consolidated balance sheets. AUC/A and assets under management are a driver of our Trust, Investment and relatedOther Servicing Fees. For the purposes of disclosing AUC/A, to the extent that both custody and administration services are provided, the value of the assets is included only once.
At December 31, 2020, AUC/A increased from December 31, 2019, primarily reflecting net inflows, favorable markets, and favorable currency translation. Assets under custody, a component of AUC/A, at December 31, 2020, increased from December 31, 2019, and included $7.42 trillion of global custody assets, compared to C&IS$5.89 trillion at December 31, 2019.
The following table presents AUC/A by reporting segment.

TABLE 12: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY/ADMINISTRATION BY REPORTING SEGMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 /20192019 /2018
Corporate & Institutional Services$13,653.1 $11,311.6 $9,490.5 21 %19 %
Wealth Management879.4 738.8 634.8 19 16 
Total Assets Under Custody/Administration$14,532.5 $12,050.4 $10,125.3 21 %19 %
The following table presents assets under custody, a component of AUC/A, by reporting segment.
TABLE 13: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY BY REPORTING SEGMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 /20192019 / 2018
Corporate & Institutional Services$10,387.7 $8,497.8 $6,971.0 22 %22 %
Wealth Management875.1 735.7 622.9 19 18 
Total Assets Under Custody$11,262.8 $9,233.5 $7,593.9 22 %22 %
Consolidated assets under custody increased from the prior year, primarily reflecting net inflows, favorable markets, and Wealth Management clients primarily byfavorable currency translation.
The following table presents the Asset Management business. The revenue and expensesinvestment allocation of Asset Management and certain other support functions are allocated fully to C&IS and Wealth Management. Income and expense associated with the Corporation’s and the Bank’s wholesale funding activities and investment portfolios, as well as certain corporate-based expense, executive level compensation, and certain nonrecurring items are not allocated to C&IS and Wealth Management, and are reported in Northern Trust’s thirdcustodied assets by reporting segment, Treasury and Other, in the following pages.segment.
C&IS and Wealth Management results are presented to promote a greater understanding of their financial performance. The information, presented on an internal management-reporting basis, is derived from internal accounting systems that support Northern Trust’s strategic objectives and management structure. Management has developed accounting systems to allocate revenue and expense related to each segment. These systems incorporate processes for allocating assets, liabilities and equity, and the applicable interest income and expense. Equity is allocated to the reporting segments based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, risk, regulatory considerations, and internal metrics. Allocations of capital and certain corporate expense may not be representative of levels that would be required if the segments were independent entities. The accounting policies used for management reporting are consistent with those described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Transfers of income and expense items are recorded at cost; there is no consolidated profit or loss on sales or transfers between reporting segments. Northern Trust’s presentations are not necessarily consistent with similar information for other financial institutions.

TABLE 14: ALLOCATION OF ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
TABLE 17: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DECEMBER 31,
202020192018
C&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTAL
Equities46 %62 %47 %45 %59 %46 %44 %54 %45 %
Fixed Income Securities36 15 34 37 18 35 39 20 37 
Cash and Other Assets16 23 17 16 23 17 15 26 16 
Securities Lending Collateral2  2 — — 
                        FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
Noninterest Income     
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,753.7
$3,434.3
$3,108.1
9 %10 %
Foreign Exchange Trading Income307.2
209.9
236.6
46
(11)
Other Noninterest Income276.6
301.9
382.2
(8)(21)
Net Interest Income (Note)1,663.9
1,475.0
1,260.0
13
17
      
Revenue (Note)6,001.4
5,421.1
4,986.9
11
9
Provision for Credit Losses(14.5)(28.0)(26.0)(48)8
Noninterest Expense4,016.9
3,769.4
3,470.7
7
9
      
Income before Income Taxes (Note)1,999.0
1,679.7
1,542.2
19
9
Provision for Income Taxes (Note)442.6
480.7
509.7
(8)(6)
      
Net Income$1,556.4
$1,199.0
$1,032.5
30 %16 %
      
Average Assets$122,946.6
$119,607.4
$115,570.3
3 %3 %

Note: Stated on an FTE basis. The consolidated figures include $41.2 million, $45.8 million, and $25.1 million of FTE adjustments for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Corporate & Institutional Services
C&IS is a leading global provider of asset servicing and related services to corporate and public retirement funds, foundations, endowments, fund managers, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, and other institutional investors around the globe. Asset servicing and related services encompass a full range of capabilities including but not limited to: custody; fund administration; investment operations outsourcing; investment management; investment risk and analytical services; employee benefit services; securities lending; foreign exchange; treasury management; brokerage services; transition management services; banking and cash management. Client relationships are managed through the Bank and the Bank’s and the Corporation’s other subsidiaries, including support from locations in North America, Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region.


48   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation37


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The following table summarizes the results of operations of C&IS for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 on a management-reporting basis.presents Northern Trust’s assets under custody by investment type.

TABLE 15: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY BY INVESTMENT TYPE
TABLE 18: C&IS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Equities$5,293.9 $4,298.6 $3,379.5 23 %27 %
Fixed Income Securities3,870.9 3,236.5 2,822.4 20 15 
Cash and Other Assets1,911.1 1,535.3 1,242.1 24 24 
Securities Lending Collateral186.9 163.1 149.9 15 
Total Assets Under Custody$11,262.8 $9,233.5 $7,593.9 22 %22 %
                        FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
Noninterest Income     
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$2,173.1
$1,984.6
$1,787.8
9 %11 %
Foreign Exchange Trading Income233.4
197.9
224.4
18
(12)
Other Noninterest Income183.0
176.1
147.0
4
20
Net Interest Income (Note)992.2
733.8
565.0
35
30
      
Revenue (Note)3,581.7
3,092.4
2,724.2
16
14
Provision for Credit Losses1.9
3.4
1.9
(44)79
Noninterest Expense2,421.4
2,194.5
2,012.2
10
9
      
Income before Income Taxes (Note)1,158.4
894.5
710.1
30
26
Provision for Income Taxes (Note)255.3
279.5
212.9
(9)31
      
Net Income$903.1
$615.0
$497.2
47 %24 %
      
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income58%51%48%  
Average Assets$82,996.5
$80,105.6
$76,194.7
4 %5 %

Note: Stated on an FTE basis.


The 47% increase in C&IS net income in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily resulted from higher net interest income, trust, investment and other servicing fees, foreign exchange trading income, and a lower provision for income taxes, partially offset by higher noninterest expense including expenses associated with the UBS acquisition. The 24% increase in C&IS net income in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily resulted from higher trust, investment and other servicing fees, net interest income, and other noninterest income, partially offset by higher noninterest expense, including expenses associated with the UBS acquisition, and lower foreign exchange trading income.

C&IS Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees
C&IS trust, investment and other servicing fees are primarily attributable to services related to custody, fund administration, investment management, and securities lending. Custody and fund administration fees are driven primarily by values of client assets under custody/administration, transaction volumes, and number of accounts. The asset values used to calculate these fees vary depending on the individual fee arrangements negotiated with each client. Custody fees related to asset values are client specific and are priced based on month-end market values, quarter-end market values, or the average of month-end market values for the quarter. The fund administration fees that are asset-value-related are priced using month-end, quarter-end, or average daily balances. Investment management fees, which are based generally on clientfollowing table presents Northern Trust’s assets under management are basedby reporting segment.

TABLE 16: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY REPORTING SEGMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Corporate & Institutional Services$1,057.5 $917.5 $790.8 15 %16 %
Wealth Management347.8 313.8 278.6 11 13 
Total Assets Under Management$1,405.3 $1,231.3 $1,069.4 14 %15 %
Assets under management at the end of 2020 increased from 2019. The increase primarily on market values throughout a period.reflected favorable markets and net inflows.
Securities lending revenue is affected by market values; the demand for securities to be lent, which drives volumes; and the interest rate spread earned on
The following tables present the investment allocation and management style of cash depositedNorthern Trust’s assets under management by investment firms as collateral for securities they have borrowed. The other services fee category in C&IS includes such products as investment risk and analytical services, benefit payments, and other services. Revenue from these products is based generally on the volume of services provided or a fixed fee.reporting segment.
Provided below are the components of C&IS trust, investment and other servicing fees.TABLE 17: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY INVESTMENT TYPE

DECEMBER 31,
202020192018
C&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTAL
Equities52 %52 %52 %53 %53 %53 %51 %47 %50 %
Fixed Income Securities11 25 15 12 25 16 13 26 17 
Cash and Other Assets19 23 20 17 22 18 17 27 19 
Securities Lending Collateral18  13 18 — 13 19 — 14 

TABLE 19: C&IS TRUST, INVESTMENT AND OTHER SERVICING FEES18: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY MANAGEMENT STYLE
DECEMBER 31,
202020192018
C&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTAL
Index58 %24 %50 %59 %27 %51 %57 %25 %49 %
Active38 39 38 37 36 37 38 39 38 
Multi-Manager4 8 5 
Other 29 7 — 29 — 29 
                        FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
Custody and Fund Administration$1,501.1
$1,342.1
$1,182.2
12 %14 %
Investment Management436.8
403.5
371.8
8
9
Securities Lending102.0
96.4
97.7
6
(1)
Other133.2
142.6
136.1
(7)5
      
Total Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$2,173.1
$1,984.6
$1,787.8
10 %11 %





201838 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation49

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Other Noninterest Income
2018 C&IS TRUST, INVESTMENT, ANDThe components of other noninterest income, and a discussion of significant changes during 2020 and 2019, are provided below.

TABLE 19: OTHER SERVICING FEESNONINTEREST INCOME
chart-be184ad15afd56a5a96.jpg
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Foreign Exchange Trading Income$290.4 $250.9 $307.2 16 %(18)%
Treasury Management Fees45.4 44.5 51.8 2 (14)
Security Commissions and Trading Income133.2 103.6 98.3 29 
Other Operating Income194.0 145.5 127.5 33 14 
Investment Security Gains (Losses), net(0.4)(1.4)(1.0)N/MN/M
Total Other Noninterest Income$662.6 $543.1 $583.8 22 %(7)%

Foreign Exchange Trading Income
Northern Trust provides foreign exchange services in the normal course of business as an integral part of its global custody services. Active management of currency positions, within conservative limits, also contributes to foreign exchange trading income. Foreign Exchange Trading Income in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily driven by higher client volumes and increased market volatility, partially offset by lower foreign exchange swap activity in Treasury.

Treasury Management Fees
Treasury Management Fees, generated from cash and treasury management products and services provided to clients, in 2020 increased from 2019.

Security Commissions and Trading Income
Security Commissions and Trading Income, generated primarily from securities brokerage services provided by Northern Trust Securities, Inc., in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily driven by higher core brokerage revenue and revenue from interest rate swaps.

Other Operating Income
The components of Other Operating Income are provided in the following table.

TABLE 20: OTHER OPERATING INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Loan Service Fees$52.5 $48.0 $48.9 9 %(2)%
Banking Service Fees46.1 45.6 46.4 1 (2)
Other Income95.4 51.9 32.2 84 60 
Total Other Operating Income$194.0 $145.5 $127.5 33 %14 %
Other income in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily due to higher income related to a bank-owned life insurance program implemented during 2019, a charge in the prior year related to the decision made to sell substantially all of the lease portfolio, and higher miscellaneous income.

Investment Security Gains (Losses), Net
Losses in 2019 included $0.3 million of charges related to the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of certain Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) eligible held-to-maturity debt securities. ASU 2016-13, adopted on January 1, 2020, replaced the legacy OTTI model with an estimated credit loss model. Refer to the caption "Investment Security Gains and Losses” in Note 4, “Securities,” and the caption “Allowance for Debt Securities Held to Maturity Securities Portfolio” in Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses” included under Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”


n69% Custody and Fund Administration
n20% Investment Management
n5% Securities Lending
n6% Other Services

Custody and fund administration fees, the largest component of trust, investment and other servicing fees, increased $159.0 million, or 12%, from 2017 to 2018 primarily due to new business, revenue associated with the UBS acquisition, the favorable impact of movements in foreign exchange rates, and favorable markets.Fees from investment management increased $33.3 million, or 8%, from 2017 to 2018 primarily due to favorable markets and a change in presentation of certain fees resulting from the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard. Securities lending revenue increased $5.6 million, or 6% from 2017 to 2018, primarily driven by higher loan volumes, partially offset by lower spreads. C&IS other trust, investment and servicing fees decreased $9.4 million, or 7%, from 2017 to 2018 primarily due to lower sub-advisor fees. The income associated with sub-advisor fees has an associated expense in outside services. C&IS trust, investment, and other servicing fees totaled $1.98 billion in 2017, an increase of $196.8 million, or 11%, from $1.79 billion in 2016, primarily due to new business, favorable markets, and revenue associated with the UBS acquisition.
Provided below is a breakdown of the C&IS assets under custody and under management.

TABLE 20: C&IS ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
                          DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Billions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
North America$3,693.4
$3,972.1
$3,334.5
(7)%19%
Europe, Middle East, and Africa2,538.6
2,602.4
2,152.2
(2)21
Asia Pacific589.2
697.1
578.4
(15)21
Securities Lending149.8
167.5
111.8
(11)50
      
Total Assets Under Custody$6,971.0
$7,439.1
$6,176.9
(6)%20%

2018 C&IS ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
chart-0443f6ef13b85c82ad8.jpg
n53% North America
n36% Europe, Middle East, and Africa
n9% Asia Pacific
n2% Securities Lending



50   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT���S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


TABLE 21: C&IS ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
                          DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Billions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
North America$493.1
$533.5
$450.2
(8)%19%
Europe, Middle East, and Africa113.3
127.3
98.8
(11)29
Asia Pacific34.6
42.9
33.2
(19)29
Securities Lending149.8
167.5
111.8
(11)50
      
Total Assets Under Management$790.8
$871.2
$694.0
(9)%26%

2018 C&IS ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
chart-d424dc0401ce52feb35.jpg
n62% North America
n14% Europe, Middle East, and Africa
n5% Asia Pacific
n19% Securities Lending

2018 C&IS ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY INVESTMENT TYPE
chart-a2fe0a5105715a63ae6.jpg
n51% Equities

n19% Securities Lending

n17% Cash and Other Assets
n13% Fixed Income Securities

C&IS assets under custody were $6.97 trillion at December 31, 2018, 6% lower than $7.44 trillion at December 31, 2017. Assets under management decreased 9% to $790.8 billion at December 31, 2018, from $871.2 billion at December 31, 2017. Cash and other assets deposited by investment firms as collateral for securities borrowed from custody clients are managed by Northern Trust and are included in assets under custody and under management. This securities lending collateral totaled $149.8 billion and $167.5 billion at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

C&IS Foreign Exchange Trading Income
Foreign exchange trading income totaled $233.4 million in 2018, a $35.5 million, or 18%, increase from $197.9 million in 2017. The increase is primarily attributable to higher client volumes and market volatility. Foreign exchange trading income in 2017 of $197.9 million decreased $26.5 million, or 12%, from $224.4 million in 2016, due to lower market volatility and client volumes.

C&IS Other Noninterest Income
Other noninterest income for 2018 totaled $183.0 million, up $6.9 million, or 4%, from $176.1 million in 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in security commissions and trading income. Other noninterest income in 2017 of

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 5139

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


$176.1 million increased $29.1 million, or 20%, from $147.0 million in 2016 primarily due to impairment charges and loss on sales related to the decision to exit a portion of a non-strategic loans and leases portfolio in 2016.

C&IS Net Interest Income
Net Interest Income is defined as the total of Interest Income and amortized fees on earning assets, less Interest Expense on deposits and borrowed funds, adjusted for the impact of interest-related hedging activity. Earning assets — including Federal Funds Sold, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell, Interest-Bearing Due From and Deposits with Banks, Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other, Securities, and Loans and Leases — are financed by a large base of interest-bearing funds that include client deposits, short-term borrowings, Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt. Short-term borrowings include Federal Funds Purchased, Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, and Other Borrowings. Earning assets also are funded by noninterest-related funds, which include demand deposits and Stockholders’ Equity. Net Interest Income is subject to variations in the level and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing funds and their relative sensitivity to interest rates. In addition, the levels of nonaccruing assets and client compensating deposit balances used to pay for services impact Net Interest Income.
Net interest incomemargin is the difference between what we earn on our assets and what we pay for deposits and other sources of funding. The direction and level of interest rates are important factors in our earnings. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing annualized Net Interest Income by average interest-earning assets.
Net Interest Income stated on an FTE basis increased $258.4 million, or 35%is a non-GAAP financial measure that facilitates the analysis of asset yields. Management believes an FTE presentation provides a clearer indication of net interest margins for comparative purposes. When adjusted to an FTE basis, yields on taxable, nontaxable, and partially taxable assets are comparable; however, the adjustment to an FTE basis has no impact on Net Income. A reconciliation of Net Interest Income on a GAAP basis to Net Interest Income on an FTE basis is provided on page 85.




40 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables present an analysis of average daily balances and interest rates affecting Net Interest Income and an analysis of Net Interest Income changes.

TABLE 21: AVERAGE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS WITH ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME (INTEREST AND RATE ON A FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)(1)
202020192018
($ In Millions)INTERESTAVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATE(7)
INTERESTAVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATE(7)
INTERESTAVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATE(7)
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other(2)
$28.8 $27,921.4 0.10 %$181.7 $18,527.7 0.98 %$207.1 $23,899.3 0.87 %
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(3)
22.4 5,400.8 0.41 72.4 5,996.7 1.21 70.0 6,022.8 1.16 
Federal Funds Sold 2.3 1.37 0.4 12.8 2.73 0.4 20.5 2.18 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell3.9 1,253.1 0.31 17.5 835.0 2.10 32.9 1,478.3 2.22 
Securities
U.S. Government63.0 4,256.7 1.48 110.4 5,296.5 2.09 108.3 5,737.1 1.89 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions48.2 2,194.3 2.20 24.4 980.5 2.49 13.9 725.2 1.91 
Government Sponsored Agency409.0 23,970.4 1.71 583.6 22,634.1 2.58 456.0 20,682.7 2.20 
Other(4)
324.1 25,635.1 1.26 381.6 21,773.3 1.75 367.5 23,136.5 1.59 
Total Securities844.3 56,056.5 1.51 1,100.0 50,684.4 2.17 945.7 50,281.5 1.88 
Loans and Leases(5)
778.5 33,498.8 2.32 1,160.7 31,052.8 3.74 1,106.5 32,028.6 3.45 
Total Interest-Earning Assets1,677.9 124,132.9 1.35 2,532.7 107,109.4 2.36 2,362.6 113,731.0 2.08 
Allowance for Credit Losses (178.0) — (111.4)— — (126.3)— 
Cash and Due from Banks and Other Central Bank Deposits(6)
 2,603.0  — 2,393.6 — — 2,534.3 — 
Buildings and Equipment 509.3  — 425.6 — — 438.5 — 
Client Security Settlement Receivables 1,357.5  — 1,070.4 — — 1,002.0 — 
Goodwill 695.4  — 682.5 — 642.5 — 
Other Assets 7,691.0  — 5,981.3 — — 4,724.6 — 
Total Assets$ $136,811.1  %$— $117,551.4 — %$— $122,946.6 — %
AVERAGE SOURCE OF FUNDS
Deposits
Savings, Money Market, and Other$47.6 $23,396.4 0.20 %$160.8 $16,577.8 0.97 %$82.0 $15,149.3 0.54 %
Savings Certificates and Other Time16.5 1,266.4 1.30 16.2 867.5 1.86 7.8 870.6 0.90 
Non-U.S. Offices – Interest-Bearing(15.7)60,486.3 (0.03)311.9 54,885.2 0.57 294.8 58,556.6 0.50 
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits48.4 85,149.1 0.06 488.9 72,330.5 0.68 384.6 74,576.5 0.52 
Federal Funds Purchased2.2 980.9 0.22 25.9 1,267.4 2.05 50.3 2,762.8 1.82 
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase1.0 218.3 0.47 6.4 339.0 1.89 7.8 525.2 1.48 
Other Borrowings45.3 6,401.1 0.71 181.7 7,752.5 2.34 150.1 7,495.5 2.00 
Senior Notes72.7 3,233.8 2.24 72.6 2,389.1 3.04 53.4 1,704.0 3.13 
Long-Term Debt26.5 1,189.2 2.24 38.3 1,139.0 3.36 45.0 1,296.8 3.47 
Floating Rate Capital Debt4.2 277.7 1.52 8.2 277.6 2.98 7.5 277.6 2.72 
Total Interest-Related Funds200.3 97,450.1 0.21 822.0 85,495.1 0.96 698.7 88,638.4 0.79 
Interest Rate Spread  1.14 — — 1.40 — — 1.29 
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits 23,362.0  — 17,455.5 — — 20,526.6 — 
Other Liabilities 4,806.4  — 3,952.4 — — 3,552.7 — 
Stockholders’ Equity 11,192.6  — 10,648.4 — — 10,228.9 — 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$ $136,811.1  %$— $117,551.4 — %$— $122,946.6 — %
Net Interest Income/Margin (FTE Adjusted)$1,477.6 $ 1.19 %$1,710.7 $— 1.60 %$1,663.9 $— 1.46 %
Net Interest Income/Margin (Unadjusted)$1,443.2 $ 1.16 %$1,677.9 $— 1.57 %$1,622.7 $— 1.43 %
Note: Net Interest Income (FTE Adjusted), in 2018a non-GAAP financial measure, includes adjustments to $992.2 million from $733.8a fully taxable equivalent basis for loans and securities. The adjustments are based on a federal income tax rate of 21.0%, where the rate is adjusted for applicable state income taxes, net of related federal tax benefit. Total taxable equivalent interest adjustments amounted to $34.4 million in 2017, primarily attributable to an increase2020, $32.8 million in the2019 and $41.2 million in 2018. A reconciliation of Net Interest Income and net interest margin on a GAAP basis to Net Interest Income and average earning assets. Netnet interest margin on an FTE basis increased(each of which is a non-GAAP financial measure) is provided on page 85. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing annualized Net Interest Income by average interest-earning assets. Interest revenue on cash collateral positions is reported above in Interest-Bearing Due From and Deposits with Banks and in Loans and Leases. Interest Expense on cash collateral positions is reported above in Non-U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing Deposits. Related cash collateral received from and deposited with derivative counterparties is recorded net of the associated derivative contract in Other Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively.
(1) Northern Trust’s non-U.S. activities are primarily related to 1.29%its asset servicing, asset management, foreign exchange, cash management, and commercial banking businesses. The operations of Northern Trust are managed on a reporting segment basis and include components of both U.S and non-U.S. source income and assets. Non-U.S. source income and assets are not separately identified in Northern Trust’s internal management reporting system. However, Northern Trust is required to disclose non-U.S. activities based on the domicile of the customer. Due to the complex and integrated nature of Northern Trust’s activities, it is difficult to segregate with precision revenues, expenses and assets between U.S. and non-U.S.-domiciled customers. On the basis of averages, the percentage of total assets attributable to foreign activities was 20%, 23% and 25% as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. On the basis of averages, the percentage of total liabilities attributable to foreign activities was 56%, 53% and 54% as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. For additional information, refer to the Geographic Area Information section of Note 32, “Reporting Segments and Related Information,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
(2) Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other includes collateral deposits with certain securities depositories and clearing houses, which are classified in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
(3) Interest-Bearing Due from 0.99%, primarilyand Deposits with Banks includes the interest-bearing component of Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks as presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
(4) Other securities include certain community development investments and Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve stock, which are classified in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
(5) Average balances include nonaccrual loans. Lease financing receivable balances are reduced by deferred income.
(6) Cash and Due from Banks and Other Central Bank Deposits includes the noninterest-bearing component of Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits on the consolidated balance sheets.
(7) Rate calculations are based on actual balances rather than the rounded amounts presented in the Average Consolidated Balance Sheets with Analysis of Net Interest Income.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 41

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE 22: ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME CHANGES DUE TO VOLUME AND RATE
(INTEREST AND RATE ON A FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)2020/2019 CHANGE DUE TO2019/2018 CHANGE DUE TO
(In Millions)AVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATENET (DECREASE) INCREASEAVERAGE
BALANCE
 AVERAGE RATENET (DECREASE) INCREASE
Increase (Decrease) in Net Interest Income (FTE)
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other$62.5 $(215.4)$(152.9)$(58.1)$32.7 $(25.4)
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(6.5)(43.5)(50.0)(0.3)2.7 2.4 
Federal Funds Sold(0.2)(0.2)(0.4)— — — 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell6.1 (19.7)(13.6)(36.5)21.1 (15.4)
Securities
U.S. Government(19.0)(28.4)(47.4)(5.4)7.5 2.1 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions26.9 (3.1)23.8 5.7 4.8 10.5 
Government Sponsored Agency32.7 (207.3)(174.6)45.1 82.5 127.6 
Other61.6 (119.1)(57.5)(20.0)34.1 14.1 
Total Securities102.2 (357.9)(255.7)25.4 128.9 154.3 
Loans and Leases177.6 (559.8)(382.2)(89.2)143.4 54.2 
Total Interest Income$341.7 $(1,196.5)$(854.8)$(158.7)$328.8 $170.1 
Interest-Bearing Deposits
Savings, Money Market and Other$48.5 $(161.7)$(113.2)$8.3 $70.5 $78.8 
Savings Certificates and Other Time(9.3)9.6 0.3 — 8.4 8.4 
Non-U.S. Offices - Interest Bearing29.2 (356.8)(327.6)(13.9)31.0 17.1 
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits68.4 (508.9)(440.5)(5.6)109.9 104.3 
Federal Funds Purchased(4.8)(18.9)(23.7)(31.9)7.5 (24.4)
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase(1.7)(3.7)(5.4)(6.5)5.1 (1.4)
Other Borrowings(27.3)(109.1)(136.4)5.3 26.3 31.6 
Senior Notes22.0 (21.9)0.1 20.6 (1.4)19.2 
Long-Term Debt13.5 (25.3)(11.8)(5.6)(1.1)(6.7)
Floating Rate Capital Debt (4.0)(4.0)— 0.7 0.7 
Total Interest Expense$70.1 $(691.8)$(621.7)$(23.7)$147.0 $123.3 
(Decrease) Increase in Net Interest Income (FTE)$271.6 $(504.7)$(233.1)$(135.0)$181.8 $46.8 
Note: Changes not due solely to average balance changes or rate changes are allocated proportionately to average balanceandrate based on their relative absolute magnitudes.

Net Interest Income in 2020 decreased from 2019. Net Interest Income, stated on an FTE basis decreased from 2019, due to a lower net interest margin, partially offset by higher short-term interest rates and a mix shift inlevels of average earning assets. Average earning assets totaled $76.9increased in 2020 from 2019, primarily reflecting higher levels of short-term interest bearing deposits, Securities, and Loans and Leases. Funding of the balance sheet reflected higher levels of client deposits. The increase in average client deposits resulted from the large inflows experienced at the end of the first quarter of 2020, and these balances were largely maintained throughout the year.
The net interest margin in 2020 decreased from 2019. The net interest margin on an FTE basis in 2020 decreased from 2019, primarily due to lower interest rates. Low levels of market interest rates are expected to continue to impact our net interest income.
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other averaged $27.9 billion an increasein 2020, which increased $9.4 billion, or 51%, from $18.5 billion in 2019, which resulted from significant deposit inflows. The higher level of $2.6client deposits were primarily placed with the Federal Reserve and other central banks and in the securities portfolio. Average Securities were $56.1 billion and increased $5.4 billion, or 11%, from $50.7 billion in the prior-year period and include certain community development investments, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and Federal Reserve stock of $769.6 million, $202.9 million and $63.5 million, respectively, which are recorded in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Average taxable Securities were $50.9 billion in 2020 and $43.9 billion in 2019. Average nontaxable Securities, which represent securities that are primarily exempt from U.S. federal and state income taxes, were $5.2 billion in 2020 and $6.8 billion in 2019. Interest-Bearing Due From and Deposits with Banks averaged $5.4 billion in 2020 and $6.0 billion in 2019.



42 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Loans and Leases averaged $33.5 billion, which increased $2.4 billion, or 8%, from $31.1 billion in 2019, primarily reflecting higher levels of commercial and institutional, private client, commercial real estate, and non-U.S. loans, partially offset by a decrease in residential real estate loans. Commercial and institutional loans averaged $10.3 billion and increased $1.3 billion, or 15%, from $9.0 billion for the prior-year period. Private client loans averaged $11.5 billion and increased $706.9 million, or 7%, from $10.7 billion for the prior-year period. Commercial real estate loans averaged $3.3 billion and increased $335.6 million, or 12%, from $2.9 billion for the prior-year period. Non-U.S. loans averaged $2.0 billion and increased $262.7 million, or 15.3%, from $1.7 billion for the prior-year period. Residential real estate loans averaged $6.1 billion and decreased $180.9 million, or 3%, from $74.3$6.3 billion for the prior-year period.
Northern Trust utilizes a diverse mix of funding sources. Average Interest-Bearing Deposits increased $12.8 billion, or 18%, to $85.1 billion in the prior year. The earning assets in C&IS consisted primarily of intercompanyassets and loans and leases. Funding sources were primarily comprised of non-U.S. custody-related interest-bearing deposits, which averaged $58.02020 from $72.3 billion in 2018, up from $53.82019. Average Interest-Related Funds increased $12.0 billion, or 14%, to $97.5 billion in 2017. Net2020 from $85.5 billion in 2019. The balances within short-term borrowing classifications vary based on funding requirements and strategies, interest incomerate levels, changes in the volume of lower-cost deposit sources, and the availability of collateral to secure these borrowings. Average net noninterest-related funds increased $5.1 billion, or 23%, to $26.7 billion in 2020 from $21.6 billion in 2019, primarily resulting from higher levels of Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits and Other Liabilities, partially offset by Other Assets. Average Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits increased $5.9 billion, or 34%, to $23.4 billion in 2020 from $17.5 billion in 2019. The average rate on an FTE basistotal source of funds was 0.16% in 2020 and 0.77% in 2019.
Interest expense for Interest-Bearing Deposits in the current year was driven by low and negative interest rates for Non-U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing Deposits and low interest rates on domestic Interest-Bearing Deposits. Average Non-U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing Deposits comprised 71% of total average Interest-Bearing Deposits for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Stockholders’ Equity averaged $11.2 billion in 2020, compared with $10.6 billion in 2019. The increased $168.8Stockholders’ Equity of $544.2 million, or 30%5%, in 2017 to $733.8 million from $565.0 million in 2016, was primarily attributable to increasesearnings and accumulated other comprehensive income since the prior-year period, partially offset by the repurchase of common stock pursuant to the Corporation’s share repurchase program, the redemption of preferred stock during the first quarter of 2020, and dividend declarations. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Corporation maintained its quarterly common stock dividend at $0.70 per share and repurchased 3,276,589 shares of common stock, returning $891.8 million in capital to common stockholders, compared to $1.7 billion in 2019.
In July 2018, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase authorization to repurchase up to 25.0 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock. Shares are repurchased by the Corporation to, among other things, manage the Corporation’s capital levels. Repurchased shares are used for general purposes, including the issuance of shares under stock option and other incentive plans. The Corporation suspended this program on March 16, 2020. Subsequent to the Corporation suspending its open-market share repurchase program, the only shares repurchased were shares of common stock withheld upon the vesting of share-based compensation to satisfy tax withholding obligations.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, the Federal Reserve announced certain measures to ensure that large financial institutions, including Northern Trust, remain resilient despite the economic uncertainty resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, for the third and fourth quarters of 2020, no share repurchases were permitted by these institutions and dividend payments were limited to the amount paid in the second quarter and could not exceed the payor’s average net interest marginincome for the four preceding quarters. On December 18, 2020, the Federal Reserve again extended its capital distribution limits into the first quarter of 2021 with certain modifications, which include continuing to limit dividend payments based on recent income and average earning assets.limiting share repurchases based on recent income. During the first quarter of 2021, the Corporation restarted its share repurchase program in accordance with such limitations. The repurchase authorization approved by the Board of Directors has no expiration date, thus the Corporation retains the ability to resume repurchases thereunder when circumstances warrant and applicable regulations permit. Please refer to Note 15, “Stockholders’ Equity,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

C&IS
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 43

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision forCorporation adopted ASU No. 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, which significantly changed the way impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of financial instruments. For more information on the adoption of ASU 2016-13, please refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The Provision for Credit Losses was $1.9a provision of $125.0 million for 2018,in 2020, as compared to a credit provision of $3.4$14.5 million in 2017,2019. The provision for 2020 primarily reflected an increase in the reserve evaluated on a collective basis. The increase in the collective basis reserve was primarily driven by current and projected economic conditions and downgrades in the portfolio, both resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts, with increases primarily in the commercial and institutional and commercial real estate portfolios. The prior-year credit provision primarily reflected a provision of $1.9 milliondecrease in 2016. The 2018 provision reflected increases to specific reservesthe inherent reserve related to standby letters of credit, partially offset by reductionsthe residential real estate portfolio due to a reduction in standby letters of credit and undrawn loan commitmentsoutstanding loans and improved credit quality resulting in a reduction ofand reductions to the inherent allowance. The 2017 provision reflected an increase to a specific reserve inrelated to the commercial portfolio which was partially charged-off during the prior year,and institutional and residential real estate portfolios, partially offset by improved credit quality across the portfolio. The 2016 provision reflected an increase to a specific reserve in the inherent reserve related to the private client portfolio due to an increase in outstanding loans and lower credit quality.
Net charge-offs in 2020 totaled $3.2 million resulting from $9.7 million of charge-offs and $6.5 million of recoveries, compared to net recoveries of $0.7 million in the prior-year resulting from $6.5 million of charge-offs and $7.2 million of recoveries.
Nonaccrual assets at December 31, 2020 increased 53% from the prior year-end. Residential real estate, commercial portfolio that was charged-off during 2016, partially offset by improved credit quality acrossreal estate, commercial and institutional, and private client loans accounted for 47%, 31%, 20%, and 2%, respectively, of nonaccrual loans and leases at December 31, 2020. Residential real estate, commercial and institutional, commercial real estate, private client, and non-U.S. loans accounted for 85%, 9%, 4%, 1%, and 1%, respectively, of total nonaccrual loans and leases at December 31, 2019. For additional discussion of the portfolio.Allowance for Credit Losses, refer to the “Asset Quality” section.


C&IS Noninterest Expense
Total C&IS noninterest expense, which includes the direct expense of the reporting segment, indirect expense allocationsNoninterest Expense for product2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting increased Compensation, Equipment and operating support,Software, Employee Benefits, Occupancy, and indirect expense allocations for certain corporate support services, totaled $2.42 billion in 2018, an increase of $226.9 million, or 10%, from $2.19 billion in 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher compensation expense, indirect expense allocations, outside services, other operating expense, and employee benefits expense, all including the impact of higher noninterest expense associated with the UBS acquisition. Noninterest expense for 2017 increased $182.3 million, or 9%, from $2.01 billion in 2016. The increase was primarily due to higher indirect expense allocations, compensation expense, severance-related charges, higher expense associated with the UBS acquisition, and higher outside services expense,Other Operating Expense, partially offset by lower other operatingOutside Services. Noninterest Expense for 2020 included severance-related charges of $55.0 million in connection with a reduction in force, a $43.4 million charge related to a corporate action processing error, and Occupancy expense related to an early lease exit arising from a workplace real estate strategy of $11.9 million.
The components of Noninterest Expense and a discussion of significant changes during 2020 and 2019 are provided below.
TABLE 23: NONINTEREST EXPENSE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Compensation$1,947.1 $1,859.0 $1,806.9 5 %%
Employee Benefits387.7 355.2 356.7 9 — 
Outside Services763.1 774.5 739.4 (1)
Equipment and Software673.5 612.1 582.2 10 
Occupancy230.1 212.9 201.1 8 
Other Operating Expense346.7 329.8 330.6 5 — 
Total Noninterest Expense$4,348.2 $4,143.5 $4,016.9 5 %%

Compensation
Compensation expense, the largest component of Noninterest Expense, increased in 2020 from 2019, primarily reflecting higher salary expense driven by staff growth and base pay adjustments, $52.5 million of severance-related charges in connection with a reduction in force, and a one-time supplemental payment to certain employees in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by lower cash-based incentives and long-term performance-based incentive expense. Staff on a full-time equivalent basis totaled approximately 20,900 at December 31, 2020, up 6% from approximately 19,800 at December 31, 2019.
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits expense in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting higher retirement plan expenses.




44 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Outside Services
Outside Services expense in 2020 decreased from 2019, primarily due to lower data processing and consulting services, partially offset by higher sub-custodian expenses. Included in Outside Services is $2.5 million of outplacement costs associated with the reduction in force.
Equipment and Software
Equipment and Software expense in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting higher depreciation and amortization and software support costs.
Occupancy
Occupancy expense in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting higher rent arising from workplace real estate strategies, including $11.9 million of expense related to an early lease exit, partially offset by an asset retirement obligation reduction resulting from a lease renegotiation.
Other Operating Expense
The components of Other Operating Expense are provided in the following table.
TABLE 24: OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Business Promotion$59.2 $104.2 $98.3 (43)%%
Staff Related29.4 42.8 33.6 (31)27 
FDIC Insurance Premiums11.8 9.9 27.4 19 (64)
Other Intangibles Amortization16.9 16.6 17.4 2 (4)
Other Expenses229.4 156.3 153.9 47 
Total Other Operating Expense$346.7 $329.8 $330.6 5 %— %

Other Operating Expense in the current year increased compared to the prior year primarily due to a $43.4 million charge related to a corporate action processing error as well as increases in mutual fund co-administration fees, partially offset by lower business promotion expense due to reduced business travel and lower staff-related expense.

Wealth Management
Wealth Management fee income is calculated primarily based on market values and is impacted by both one-month and one-quarter lagged asset values. Wealth Management fees increased from 2019 to 2020, primarily due to favorable markets and new business, partially offset by money market mutual fund fee waivers. The following tables provide a summary of Wealth Management assets under custody and under management.

TABLE 8: WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Global Family Office$600.7 $474.1 $405.5 27 %17 %
Central120.0 115.1 88.2 4 31 
East89.1 81.7 72.7 9 12 
West65.3 64.8 56.5 1 15 
Total Assets Under Custody$875.1 $735.7 $622.9 19 %18 %

TABLE 9: WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Global Family Office$114.0 $94.2 $83.5 21 %13 %
Central109.3 104.4 96.2 5 
East73.3 66.8 57.0 10 17 
West51.2 48.4 41.9 6 16 
Total Assets Under Management$347.8 $313.8 $278.6 11 %13 %

The Wealth Management regions shown are comprised of the following: Central includes Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio and Wisconsin; East includes Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.; West includes Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Texas and Washington. Global Family Office provides specialized asset management, investment consulting, global custody, fiduciary, and private banking services to ultra-wealthy domestic and international clients.
Market Indices
The following tables present selected market indices and the percentage changes year over year to provide context regarding equity and fixed income market impacts on the Corporation’s results.

TABLE 10: EQUITY MARKET INDICES
DAILY AVERAGESYEAR-END
20202019CHANGE20202019CHANGE
S&P 5003,218 2,912 11 %3,756 3,231 16 %
MSCI EAFE (U.S. dollars)1,853 1,891 (2)2,148 2,037 5 
MSCI EAFE (local currency)1,074 1,118 (4)1,174 1,190 (1)




36 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE 11: FIXED INCOME MARKET INDICES
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
20202019CHANGE
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index2,392 2,225 8 %
Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index559 512 9 

Client Assets
Northern Trust, in the normal course of business, holds assets under custody/administration and management in a fiduciary or agency capacity for its clients. In accordance with GAAP, these assets are not assets of Northern Trust and are not included in its consolidated balance sheets. AUC/A and assets under management are a driver of our Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees. For the purposes of disclosing AUC/A, to the extent that both custody and administration services are provided, the value of the assets is included only once.
At December 31, 2020, AUC/A increased from December 31, 2019, primarily reflecting net inflows, favorable markets, and favorable currency translation. Assets under custody, a component of AUC/A, at December 31, 2020, increased from December 31, 2019, and included $7.42 trillion of global custody assets, compared to $5.89 trillion at December 31, 2019.
The following table presents AUC/A by reporting segment.

TABLE 12: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY/ADMINISTRATION BY REPORTING SEGMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 /20192019 /2018
Corporate & Institutional Services$13,653.1 $11,311.6 $9,490.5 21 %19 %
Wealth Management879.4 738.8 634.8 19 16 
Total Assets Under Custody/Administration$14,532.5 $12,050.4 $10,125.3 21 %19 %
The following table presents assets under custody, a component of AUC/A, by reporting segment.
TABLE 13: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY BY REPORTING SEGMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 /20192019 / 2018
Corporate & Institutional Services$10,387.7 $8,497.8 $6,971.0 22 %22 %
Wealth Management875.1 735.7 622.9 19 18 
Total Assets Under Custody$11,262.8 $9,233.5 $7,593.9 22 %22 %
Consolidated assets under custody increased from the prior year, primarily reflecting net inflows, favorable markets, and favorable currency translation.
The following table presents the investment allocation of Northern Trust’s custodied assets by reporting segment.

TABLE 14: ALLOCATION OF ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
DECEMBER 31,
202020192018
C&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTAL
Equities46 %62 %47 %45 %59 %46 %44 %54 %45 %
Fixed Income Securities36 15 34 37 18 35 39 20 37 
Cash and Other Assets16 23 17 16 23 17 15 26 16 
Securities Lending Collateral2  2 — — 

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 37

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents Northern Trust’s assets under custody by investment type.
TABLE 15: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY BY INVESTMENT TYPE
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Equities$5,293.9 $4,298.6 $3,379.5 23 %27 %
Fixed Income Securities3,870.9 3,236.5 2,822.4 20 15 
Cash and Other Assets1,911.1 1,535.3 1,242.1 24 24 
Securities Lending Collateral186.9 163.1 149.9 15 
Total Assets Under Custody$11,262.8 $9,233.5 $7,593.9 22 %22 %

The following table presents Northern Trust’s assets under management by reporting segment.

TABLE 16: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY REPORTING SEGMENT
DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Corporate & Institutional Services$1,057.5 $917.5 $790.8 15 %16 %
Wealth Management347.8 313.8 278.6 11 13 
Total Assets Under Management$1,405.3 $1,231.3 $1,069.4 14 %15 %
Assets under management at the end of 2020 increased from 2019. The increase primarily reflected favorable markets and net inflows.

The following tables present the investment allocation and management style of Northern Trust’s assets under management by reporting segment.
TABLE 17: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY INVESTMENT TYPE
DECEMBER 31,
202020192018
C&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTAL
Equities52 %52 %52 %53 %53 %53 %51 %47 %50 %
Fixed Income Securities11 25 15 12 25 16 13 26 17 
Cash and Other Assets19 23 20 17 22 18 17 27 19 
Securities Lending Collateral18  13 18 — 13 19 — 14 

TABLE 18: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY MANAGEMENT STYLE
DECEMBER 31,
202020192018
C&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTALC&ISWMTOTAL
Index58 %24 %50 %59 %27 %51 %57 %25 %49 %
Active38 39 38 37 36 37 38 39 38 
Multi-Manager4 8 5 
Other 29 7 — 29 — 29 




38 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Other Noninterest Income
The components of other noninterest income, and a discussion of significant changes during 2020 and 2019, are provided below.

TABLE 19: OTHER NONINTEREST INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Foreign Exchange Trading Income$290.4 $250.9 $307.2 16 %(18)%
Treasury Management Fees45.4 44.5 51.8 2 (14)
Security Commissions and Trading Income133.2 103.6 98.3 29 
Other Operating Income194.0 145.5 127.5 33 14 
Investment Security Gains (Losses), net(0.4)(1.4)(1.0)N/MN/M
Total Other Noninterest Income$662.6 $543.1 $583.8 22 %(7)%

Foreign Exchange Trading Income
Northern Trust provides foreign exchange services in the normal course of business as an integral part of its global custody services. Active management of currency positions, within conservative limits, also contributes to foreign exchange trading income. Foreign Exchange Trading Income in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily driven by higher client volumes and increased market volatility, partially offset by lower foreign exchange swap activity in Treasury.

Treasury Management Fees
Treasury Management Fees, generated from cash and treasury management products and services provided to clients, in 2020 increased from 2019.

Security Commissions and Trading Income
Security Commissions and Trading Income, generated primarily from securities brokerage services provided by Northern Trust Securities, Inc., in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily driven by higher core brokerage revenue and revenue from interest rate swaps.

Other Operating Income
The components of Other Operating Income are provided in the following table.

TABLE 20: OTHER OPERATING INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Loan Service Fees$52.5 $48.0 $48.9 9 %(2)%
Banking Service Fees46.1 45.6 46.4 1 (2)
Other Income95.4 51.9 32.2 84 60 
Total Other Operating Income$194.0 $145.5 $127.5 33 %14 %
Other income in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily due to higher income related to a bank-owned life insurance program implemented during 2019, a charge in the prior year related to the decision made to sell substantially all of the lease portfolio, and higher miscellaneous income.

Investment Security Gains (Losses), Net
Losses in 2019 included $0.3 million of charges related to the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of certain Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) eligible held-to-maturity debt securities. ASU 2016-13, adopted on January 1, 2020, replaced the legacy OTTI model with an estimated credit loss model. Refer to the caption "Investment Security Gains and Losses” in Note 4, “Securities,” and the caption “Allowance for Debt Securities Held to Maturity Securities Portfolio” in Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses” included under Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”


2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 39

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net Interest Income is defined as the total of Interest Income and amortized fees on earning assets, less Interest Expense on deposits and borrowed funds, adjusted for the impact of interest-related hedging activity. Earning assets — including Federal Funds Sold, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell, Interest-Bearing Due From and Deposits with Banks, Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other, Securities, and Loans and Leases — are financed by a large base of interest-bearing funds that include client deposits, short-term borrowings, Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt. Short-term borrowings include Federal Funds Purchased, Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, and Other Borrowings. Earning assets also are funded by noninterest-related funds, which include demand deposits and Stockholders’ Equity. Net Interest Income is subject to variations in the level and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing funds and their relative sensitivity to interest rates. In addition, the levels of nonaccruing assets and client compensating deposit balances used to pay for services impact Net Interest Income.
Net interest margin is the difference between what we earn on our assets and what we pay for deposits and other sources of funding. The direction and level of interest rates are important factors in our earnings. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing annualized Net Interest Income by average interest-earning assets.
Net Interest Income stated on an FTE basis is a non-GAAP financial measure that facilitates the analysis of asset yields. Management believes an FTE presentation provides a clearer indication of net interest margins for comparative purposes. When adjusted to an FTE basis, yields on taxable, nontaxable, and partially taxable assets are comparable; however, the adjustment to an FTE basis has no impact on Net Income. A reconciliation of Net Interest Income on a GAAP basis to Net Interest Income on an FTE basis is provided on page 85.




40 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables present an analysis of average daily balances and interest rates affecting Net Interest Income and an analysis of Net Interest Income changes.

TABLE 21: AVERAGE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS WITH ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME (INTEREST AND RATE ON A FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)(1)
202020192018
($ In Millions)INTERESTAVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATE(7)
INTERESTAVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATE(7)
INTERESTAVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATE(7)
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other(2)
$28.8 $27,921.4 0.10 %$181.7 $18,527.7 0.98 %$207.1 $23,899.3 0.87 %
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(3)
22.4 5,400.8 0.41 72.4 5,996.7 1.21 70.0 6,022.8 1.16 
Federal Funds Sold 2.3 1.37 0.4 12.8 2.73 0.4 20.5 2.18 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell3.9 1,253.1 0.31 17.5 835.0 2.10 32.9 1,478.3 2.22 
Securities
U.S. Government63.0 4,256.7 1.48 110.4 5,296.5 2.09 108.3 5,737.1 1.89 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions48.2 2,194.3 2.20 24.4 980.5 2.49 13.9 725.2 1.91 
Government Sponsored Agency409.0 23,970.4 1.71 583.6 22,634.1 2.58 456.0 20,682.7 2.20 
Other(4)
324.1 25,635.1 1.26 381.6 21,773.3 1.75 367.5 23,136.5 1.59 
Total Securities844.3 56,056.5 1.51 1,100.0 50,684.4 2.17 945.7 50,281.5 1.88 
Loans and Leases(5)
778.5 33,498.8 2.32 1,160.7 31,052.8 3.74 1,106.5 32,028.6 3.45 
Total Interest-Earning Assets1,677.9 124,132.9 1.35 2,532.7 107,109.4 2.36 2,362.6 113,731.0 2.08 
Allowance for Credit Losses (178.0) — (111.4)— — (126.3)— 
Cash and Due from Banks and Other Central Bank Deposits(6)
 2,603.0  — 2,393.6 — — 2,534.3 — 
Buildings and Equipment 509.3  — 425.6 — — 438.5 — 
Client Security Settlement Receivables 1,357.5  — 1,070.4 — — 1,002.0 — 
Goodwill 695.4  — 682.5 — 642.5 — 
Other Assets 7,691.0  — 5,981.3 — — 4,724.6 — 
Total Assets$ $136,811.1  %$— $117,551.4 — %$— $122,946.6 — %
AVERAGE SOURCE OF FUNDS
Deposits
Savings, Money Market, and Other$47.6 $23,396.4 0.20 %$160.8 $16,577.8 0.97 %$82.0 $15,149.3 0.54 %
Savings Certificates and Other Time16.5 1,266.4 1.30 16.2 867.5 1.86 7.8 870.6 0.90 
Non-U.S. Offices – Interest-Bearing(15.7)60,486.3 (0.03)311.9 54,885.2 0.57 294.8 58,556.6 0.50 
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits48.4 85,149.1 0.06 488.9 72,330.5 0.68 384.6 74,576.5 0.52 
Federal Funds Purchased2.2 980.9 0.22 25.9 1,267.4 2.05 50.3 2,762.8 1.82 
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase1.0 218.3 0.47 6.4 339.0 1.89 7.8 525.2 1.48 
Other Borrowings45.3 6,401.1 0.71 181.7 7,752.5 2.34 150.1 7,495.5 2.00 
Senior Notes72.7 3,233.8 2.24 72.6 2,389.1 3.04 53.4 1,704.0 3.13 
Long-Term Debt26.5 1,189.2 2.24 38.3 1,139.0 3.36 45.0 1,296.8 3.47 
Floating Rate Capital Debt4.2 277.7 1.52 8.2 277.6 2.98 7.5 277.6 2.72 
Total Interest-Related Funds200.3 97,450.1 0.21 822.0 85,495.1 0.96 698.7 88,638.4 0.79 
Interest Rate Spread  1.14 — — 1.40 — — 1.29 
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits 23,362.0  — 17,455.5 — — 20,526.6 — 
Other Liabilities 4,806.4  — 3,952.4 — — 3,552.7 — 
Stockholders’ Equity 11,192.6  — 10,648.4 — — 10,228.9 — 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$ $136,811.1  %$— $117,551.4 — %$— $122,946.6 — %
Net Interest Income/Margin (FTE Adjusted)$1,477.6 $ 1.19 %$1,710.7 $— 1.60 %$1,663.9 $— 1.46 %
Net Interest Income/Margin (Unadjusted)$1,443.2 $ 1.16 %$1,677.9 $— 1.57 %$1,622.7 $— 1.43 %
Note: Net Interest Income (FTE Adjusted), a non-GAAP financial measure, includes adjustments to a fully taxable equivalent basis for loans and securities. The adjustments are based on a federal income tax rate of 21.0%, where the rate is adjusted for applicable state income taxes, net of related federal tax benefit. Total taxable equivalent interest adjustments amounted to $34.4 million in 2020, $32.8 million in 2019 and $41.2 million in 2018. A reconciliation of Net Interest Income and net interest margin on a GAAP basis to Net Interest Income and net interest margin on an FTE basis (each of which is a non-GAAP financial measure) is provided on page 85. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing annualized Net Interest Income by average interest-earning assets. Interest revenue on cash collateral positions is reported above in Interest-Bearing Due From and Deposits with Banks and in Loans and Leases. Interest Expense on cash collateral positions is reported above in Non-U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing Deposits. Related cash collateral received from and deposited with derivative counterparties is recorded net of the associated derivative contract in Other Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively.
(1) Northern Trust’s non-U.S. activities are primarily related to its asset servicing, asset management, foreign exchange, cash management, and commercial banking businesses. The operations of Northern Trust are managed on a reporting segment basis and include components of both U.S and non-U.S. source income and assets. Non-U.S. source income and assets are not separately identified in Northern Trust’s internal management reporting system. However, Northern Trust is required to disclose non-U.S. activities based on the domicile of the customer. Due to the complex and integrated nature of Northern Trust’s activities, it is difficult to segregate with precision revenues, expenses and assets between U.S. and non-U.S.-domiciled customers. On the basis of averages, the percentage of total assets attributable to foreign activities was 20%, 23% and 25% as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. On the basis of averages, the percentage of total liabilities attributable to foreign activities was 56%, 53% and 54% as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. For additional information, refer to the Geographic Area Information section of Note 32, “Reporting Segments and Related Information,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
(2) Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other includes collateral deposits with certain securities depositories and clearing houses, which are classified in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
(3) Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks includes the interest-bearing component of Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks as presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
(4) Other securities include certain community development investments and Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve stock, which are classified in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
(5) Average balances include nonaccrual loans. Lease financing receivable balances are reduced by deferred income.
(6) Cash and Due from Banks and Other Central Bank Deposits includes the noninterest-bearing component of Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits on the consolidated balance sheets.
(7) Rate calculations are based on actual balances rather than the rounded amounts presented in the Average Consolidated Balance Sheets with Analysis of Net Interest Income.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 41

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE 22: ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME CHANGES DUE TO VOLUME AND RATE
(INTEREST AND RATE ON A FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)2020/2019 CHANGE DUE TO2019/2018 CHANGE DUE TO
(In Millions)AVERAGE
BALANCE
AVERAGE RATENET (DECREASE) INCREASEAVERAGE
BALANCE
 AVERAGE RATENET (DECREASE) INCREASE
Increase (Decrease) in Net Interest Income (FTE)
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other$62.5 $(215.4)$(152.9)$(58.1)$32.7 $(25.4)
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(6.5)(43.5)(50.0)(0.3)2.7 2.4 
Federal Funds Sold(0.2)(0.2)(0.4)— — — 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell6.1 (19.7)(13.6)(36.5)21.1 (15.4)
Securities
U.S. Government(19.0)(28.4)(47.4)(5.4)7.5 2.1 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions26.9 (3.1)23.8 5.7 4.8 10.5 
Government Sponsored Agency32.7 (207.3)(174.6)45.1 82.5 127.6 
Other61.6 (119.1)(57.5)(20.0)34.1 14.1 
Total Securities102.2 (357.9)(255.7)25.4 128.9 154.3 
Loans and Leases177.6 (559.8)(382.2)(89.2)143.4 54.2 
Total Interest Income$341.7 $(1,196.5)$(854.8)$(158.7)$328.8 $170.1 
Interest-Bearing Deposits
Savings, Money Market and Other$48.5 $(161.7)$(113.2)$8.3 $70.5 $78.8 
Savings Certificates and Other Time(9.3)9.6 0.3 — 8.4 8.4 
Non-U.S. Offices - Interest Bearing29.2 (356.8)(327.6)(13.9)31.0 17.1 
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits68.4 (508.9)(440.5)(5.6)109.9 104.3 
Federal Funds Purchased(4.8)(18.9)(23.7)(31.9)7.5 (24.4)
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase(1.7)(3.7)(5.4)(6.5)5.1 (1.4)
Other Borrowings(27.3)(109.1)(136.4)5.3 26.3 31.6 
Senior Notes22.0 (21.9)0.1 20.6 (1.4)19.2 
Long-Term Debt13.5 (25.3)(11.8)(5.6)(1.1)(6.7)
Floating Rate Capital Debt (4.0)(4.0)— 0.7 0.7 
Total Interest Expense$70.1 $(691.8)$(621.7)$(23.7)$147.0 $123.3 
(Decrease) Increase in Net Interest Income (FTE)$271.6 $(504.7)$(233.1)$(135.0)$181.8 $46.8 
Note: Changes not due solely to average balance changes or rate changes are allocated proportionately to average balanceandrate based on their relative absolute magnitudes.

Net Interest Income in 2020 decreased from 2019. Net Interest Income, stated on an FTE basis decreased from 2019, due to a lower net interest margin, partially offset by higher levels of average earning assets. Average earning assets increased in 2020 from 2019, primarily reflecting higher levels of short-term interest bearing deposits, Securities, and Loans and Leases. Funding of the balance sheet reflected higher levels of client deposits. The increase in average client deposits resulted from the large inflows experienced at the end of the first quarter of 2020, and these balances were largely maintained throughout the year.
The net interest margin in 2020 decreased from 2019. The net interest margin on an FTE basis in 2020 decreased from 2019, primarily due to lower interest rates. Low levels of market interest rates are expected to continue to impact our net interest income.
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other averaged $27.9 billion in 2020, which increased $9.4 billion, or 51%, from $18.5 billion in 2019, which resulted from significant deposit inflows. The higher level of client deposits were primarily placed with the Federal Reserve and other central banks and in the securities portfolio. Average Securities were $56.1 billion and increased $5.4 billion, or 11%, from $50.7 billion in the prior-year period and include certain community development investments, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and Federal Reserve stock of $769.6 million, $202.9 million and $63.5 million, respectively, which are recorded in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Average taxable Securities were $50.9 billion in 2020 and $43.9 billion in 2019. Average nontaxable Securities, which represent securities that are primarily exempt from U.S. federal and state income taxes, were $5.2 billion in 2020 and $6.8 billion in 2019. Interest-Bearing Due From and Deposits with Banks averaged $5.4 billion in 2020 and $6.0 billion in 2019.



42 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Loans and Leases averaged $33.5 billion, which increased $2.4 billion, or 8%, from $31.1 billion in 2019, primarily reflecting higher levels of commercial and institutional, private client, commercial real estate, and non-U.S. loans, partially offset by a decrease in residential real estate loans. Commercial and institutional loans averaged $10.3 billion and increased $1.3 billion, or 15%, from $9.0 billion for the prior-year period. Private client loans averaged $11.5 billion and increased $706.9 million, or 7%, from $10.7 billion for the prior-year period. Commercial real estate loans averaged $3.3 billion and increased $335.6 million, or 12%, from $2.9 billion for the prior-year period. Non-U.S. loans averaged $2.0 billion and increased $262.7 million, or 15.3%, from $1.7 billion for the prior-year period. Residential real estate loans averaged $6.1 billion and decreased $180.9 million, or 3%, from $6.3 billion for the prior-year period.
Northern Trust utilizes a diverse mix of funding sources. Average Interest-Bearing Deposits increased $12.8 billion, or 18%, to $85.1 billion in 2020 from $72.3 billion in 2019. Average Interest-Related Funds increased $12.0 billion, or 14%, to $97.5 billion in 2020 from $85.5 billion in 2019. The balances within short-term borrowing classifications vary based on funding requirements and strategies, interest rate levels, changes in the volume of lower-cost deposit sources, and the availability of collateral to secure these borrowings. Average net noninterest-related funds increased $5.1 billion, or 23%, to $26.7 billion in 2020 from $21.6 billion in 2019, primarily resulting from higher levels of Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits and Other Liabilities, partially offset by Other Assets. Average Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits increased $5.9 billion, or 34%, to $23.4 billion in 2020 from $17.5 billion in 2019. The average rate on total source of funds was 0.16% in 2020 and 0.77% in 2019.
Interest expense for Interest-Bearing Deposits in the current year was driven by low and negative interest rates for Non-U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing Deposits and low interest rates on domestic Interest-Bearing Deposits. Average Non-U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing Deposits comprised 71% of total average Interest-Bearing Deposits for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Stockholders’ Equity averaged $11.2 billion in 2020, compared with $10.6 billion in 2019. The increased Stockholders’ Equity of $544.2 million, or 5%, was primarily attributable to earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income since the prior-year period, partially offset by the repurchase of common stock pursuant to the Corporation’s share repurchase program, the redemption of preferred stock during the first quarter of 2020, and dividend declarations. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Corporation maintained its quarterly common stock dividend at $0.70 per share and repurchased 3,276,589 shares of common stock, returning $891.8 million in capital to common stockholders, compared to $1.7 billion in 2019.
In July 2018, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase authorization to repurchase up to 25.0 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock. Shares are repurchased by the Corporation to, among other things, manage the Corporation’s capital levels. Repurchased shares are used for general purposes, including the issuance of shares under stock option and other incentive plans. The Corporation suspended this program on March 16, 2020. Subsequent to the Corporation suspending its open-market share repurchase program, the only shares repurchased were shares of common stock withheld upon the vesting of share-based compensation to satisfy tax withholding obligations.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, the Federal Reserve announced certain measures to ensure that large financial institutions, including Northern Trust, remain resilient despite the economic uncertainty resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, for the third and fourth quarters of 2020, no share repurchases were permitted by these institutions and dividend payments were limited to the amount paid in the second quarter and could not exceed the payor’s average net income for the four preceding quarters. On December 18, 2020, the Federal Reserve again extended its capital distribution limits into the first quarter of 2021 with certain modifications, which include continuing to limit dividend payments based on recent income and limiting share repurchases based on recent income. During the first quarter of 2021, the Corporation restarted its share repurchase program in accordance with such limitations. The repurchase authorization approved by the Board of Directors has no expiration date, thus the Corporation retains the ability to resume repurchases thereunder when circumstances warrant and applicable regulations permit. Please refer to Note 15, “Stockholders’ Equity,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 43

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Provision for Credit Losses
The Corporation adopted ASU No. 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, which significantly changed the way impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of financial instruments. For more information on the adoption of ASU 2016-13, please refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The Provision for Credit Losses was a provision of $125.0 million in 2020, as compared to a credit provision of $14.5 million in 2019. The provision for 2020 primarily reflected an increase in the reserve evaluated on a collective basis. The increase in the collective basis reserve was primarily driven by current and projected economic conditions and downgrades in the portfolio, both resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts, with increases primarily in the commercial and institutional and commercial real estate portfolios. The prior-year credit provision primarily reflected a decrease in the inherent reserve related to the residential real estate portfolio due to a reduction in outstanding loans and improved credit quality and reductions to the specific reserve related to the commercial and institutional and residential real estate portfolios, partially offset by an increase in the inherent reserve related to the private client portfolio due to an increase in outstanding loans and lower credit quality.
Net charge-offs in 2020 totaled $3.2 million resulting from $9.7 million of charge-offs and $6.5 million of recoveries, compared to net recoveries of $0.7 million in the prior-year resulting from $6.5 million of charge-offs and $7.2 million of recoveries.
Nonaccrual assets at December 31, 2020 increased 53% from the prior year-end. Residential real estate, commercial real estate, commercial and institutional, and private client loans accounted for 47%, 31%, 20%, and 2%, respectively, of nonaccrual loans and leases at December 31, 2020. Residential real estate, commercial and institutional, commercial real estate, private client, and non-U.S. loans accounted for 85%, 9%, 4%, 1%, and 1%, respectively, of total nonaccrual loans and leases at December 31, 2019. For additional discussion of the Allowance for Credit Losses, refer to the “Asset Quality” section.

Noninterest Expense
Noninterest Expense for 2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting increased Compensation, Equipment and Software, Employee Benefits, Occupancy, and Other Operating Expense, partially offset by lower Outside Services. Noninterest Expense for 2020 included severance-related charges of $55.0 million in connection with a reduction in force, a $43.4 million charge related to a corporate action processing error, and Occupancy expense related to an early lease exit arising from a workplace real estate strategy of $11.9 million.
The components of Noninterest Expense and a discussion of significant changes during 2020 and 2019 are provided below.
TABLE 23: NONINTEREST EXPENSE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Compensation$1,947.1 $1,859.0 $1,806.9 5 %%
Employee Benefits387.7 355.2 356.7 9 — 
Outside Services763.1 774.5 739.4 (1)
Equipment and Software673.5 612.1 582.2 10 
Occupancy230.1 212.9 201.1 8 
Other Operating Expense346.7 329.8 330.6 5 — 
Total Noninterest Expense$4,348.2 $4,143.5 $4,016.9 5 %%

Compensation
Compensation expense, the largest component of Noninterest Expense, increased in 2020 from 2019, primarily reflecting higher salary expense driven by staff growth and base pay adjustments, $52.5 million of severance-related charges in connection with a reduction in force, and a one-time supplemental payment to certain employees in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by lower cash-based incentives and long-term performance-based incentive expense. Staff on a full-time equivalent basis totaled approximately 20,900 at December 31, 2020, up 6% from approximately 19,800 at December 31, 2019.
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits expense in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting higher retirement plan expenses.



44 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Outside Services
Outside Services expense in 2020 decreased from 2019, primarily due to lower data processing and consulting services, partially offset by higher sub-custodian expenses. Included in Outside Services is $2.5 million of outplacement costs associated with the reduction in force.
Equipment and Software
Equipment and Software expense in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting higher depreciation and amortization and software support costs.
Occupancy
Occupancy expense in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily reflecting higher rent arising from workplace real estate strategies, including $11.9 million of expense related to an early lease exit, partially offset by an asset retirement obligation reduction resulting from a lease renegotiation.
Other Operating Expense
The components of Other Operating Expense are provided in the following table.
TABLE 24: OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Business Promotion$59.2 $104.2 $98.3 (43)%%
Staff Related29.4 42.8 33.6 (31)27 
FDIC Insurance Premiums11.8 9.9 27.4 19 (64)
Other Intangibles Amortization16.9 16.6 17.4 2 (4)
Other Expenses229.4 156.3 153.9 47 
Total Other Operating Expense$346.7 $329.8 $330.6 5 %— %

Other Operating Expense in the current year increased compared to the prior year primarily due to a $43.4 million charge related to a corporate action processing error as well as increases in mutual fund co-administration fees, partially offset by lower business promotion expense due to reduced business travel and lower staff-related expense.

Provision for Income Taxes
The 2020 Provision for Income Taxes was $418.3 million, representing an effective rate of 25.7%. This compares with a Provision for Income Taxes of $451.9 million and an effective rate of 23.2% in 2019. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily driven by $26.8 million of tax expense related to the reversal of tax benefits previously recognized through earnings and higher taxes payable on the income of the Corporation’s non-U.S. branches.
See Note 22, “Income Taxes,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for more information on income taxes.
REPORTING SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION
The following information summarizes our consolidated results of operations by reporting segment for 2020 compared to 2019. For a discussion related to the consolidated results of operations by reporting segment for 2019 compared to 2018, refer to Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2019 Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 25, 2020.
    Northern Trust is organized around its two client-focused reporting segments: C&IS and Wealth Management. Asset management and related services are provided to C&IS and Wealth Management clients primarily by the Asset Management business. The revenue and expenses of Asset Management and certain other support functions are allocated fully to C&IS and Wealth Management.
Reporting segment financial information, presented on an internal management-reporting basis, is determined by accounting systems used to allocate revenue and expense to each segment, and incorporates processes for allocating assets, liabilities, equity and the applicable interest income and expense utilizing a funds transfer pricing (FTP) methodology. Under the methodology, assets and liabilities receive a funding charge or credit that considers interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and other product characteristics on an instrument level. Equity is allocated to the reporting segments based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, risk, regulatory considerations, and internal metrics. Allocations of capital and certain corporate expense may not be representative of levels that would be required if the segments were independent entities. The accounting policies used for management reporting are consistent with those described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Transfers of income and expense items are recorded at cost; there is no consolidated profit or loss on sales or transfers between
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 45

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
reporting segments. Northern Trust's presentations are not necessarily consistent with similar information for other financial institutions.
Effective January 1, 2019, Northern Trust implemented several enhancements to its FTP methodology, including the allocation of contingent liquidity charges to C&IS and Wealth Management client instruments and products. These methodology enhancements affect the results of each reporting segment. Due to the lack of historical information, segment results for periods ended prior to January 1, 2019 have not been revised to reflect the methodology enhancements.
Also effective January 1, 2019, revenues, expenses and average assets are allocated to C&IS and Wealth Management, with the exception of non-recurring activities such as certain costs associated with acquisitions, divestitures, litigation, restructuring, and tax adjustments not directly attributable to a specific reporting segment.
For reporting periods ended prior to January 1, 2019, income and expense associated with the wholesale funding activities and investment portfolios of the Corporation and the Bank, as well as certain corporate-based expense, executive-level compensation and nonrecurring items, were not allocated to C&IS and Wealth Management, and were reported in Treasury and Other.
Reporting segment results are subject to reclassification when organizational changes are made. The results are also subject to refinements in revenue and expense allocation methodologies, which are typically reflected on a prospective basis. The following table presents the earnings and average assets for the Corporation.

TABLE 25: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Noninterest Income
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,995.0 $3,852.1 $3,753.7 4 %%
Foreign Exchange Trading Income290.4 250.9 307.2 16 (18)
Other Noninterest Income372.2 292.2 276.6 27 
Total Noninterest Income4,657.6 4,395.2 4,337.5 6 
Net Interest Income(1)
1,477.6 1,710.7 1,663.9 (14)
Revenue(1)
6,135.2 6,105.9 6,001.4  
Provision for Credit Losses125.0 (14.5)(14.5)N/M— 
Noninterest Expense4,348.2 4,143.5 4,016.9 5 
Income before Income Taxes(1)
1,662.0 1,976.9 1,999.0 (16)(1)
Provision for Income Taxes(1)
452.7 484.7 442.6 (7)10 
Net Income$1,209.3 $1,492.2 $1,556.4 (19)%(4)%
Average Assets$136,811.1 $117,551.4 $122,946.6 16 %(4)%
(1) Non-GAAP financial measures stated on an FTE basis. The consolidated figures include $34.4 million, $32.8 million, and $41.2 million of FTE adjustments for 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. A reconciliation of total consolidated revenue, Net Interest Income and net interest margin on a GAAP basis to revenue, Net Interest Income and net interest margin on an FTE basis, respectively, (each of which is a non-GAAP financial measure) is provided on page 85.
Corporate & Institutional Services
C&IS is a leading global provider of asset servicing and related services to corporate and public retirement funds, foundations, endowments, fund managers, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, and other institutional investors around the globe. Asset servicing and related services encompass a full range of capabilities including but not limited to: custody; fund administration; investment operations outsourcing; investment management; investment risk and analytical services; employee benefit services; securities lending; foreign exchange; treasury management; brokerage services; transition management services; banking and cash management. Client relationships are managed through the Bank and the Bank’s and the Corporation’s other subsidiaries, including support from locations in North America, Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region. The following table summarizes the results of operations of C&IS for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 on a management-reporting basis.



46 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE 26: C&IS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Noninterest Income
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$2,321.6 $2,211.5 $2,173.1 5 %%
Foreign Exchange Trading Income276.3 232.2 233.4 19 (1)
Other Noninterest Income222.5 178.2 183.0 25 (3)
Total Noninterest Income2,820.4 2,621.9 2,589.5 8 
Net Interest Income(1)
665.5 918.7 992.2 (28)(7)
Revenue(1)
3,485.9 3,540.6 3,581.7 (2)(1)
Provision for Credit Losses38.1 1.9 1.9 N/M— 
Noninterest Expense2,752.7 2,605.5 2,421.4 6 
Income before Income Taxes(1)
695.1 933.2 1,158.4 (26)(19)
Provision for Income Taxes(1)
174.4 219.4 255.3 (21)(14)
Net Income$520.7 $713.8 $903.1 (27)%(21)%
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income43 %48 %58 %
Average Assets$104,790.6 $87,557.1 $82,996.5 20 %%
(1) Non-GAAP financial measures stated on an FTE basis.

C&IS Net Income
Net Income decreased in 2020 compared to 2019, primarily due to lower Net Interest Income and higher Noninterest Expense, partially offset by higher Noninterest Income.

C&IS Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees
For an explanation of C&IS Trust, Investment, and Other Servicing Fees, please see the “Trust, Investment, and Other Servicing Fees” section within the Consolidated Results of Operations section of the MD&A.
C&IS Foreign Exchange Trading Income
Foreign Exchange Trading Income in 2020 increased from 2019, primarily driven by higher client volumes and increased market volatility.
C&IS Other Noninterest Income
Other Noninterest Income for 2020 increased from 2019, primarily due to Security Commissions and Trading Income and Other Operating Income.
C&IS Net Interest Income
Net Interest Income on an FTE basis decreased in 2020 from 2019, due to a lower net interest margin, partially offset by an increase in average earning assets. Net interest margin on an FTE basis decreased to 0.75% from 1.26%. Average earning assets of $94.6 billion, increased $15.5 billion, or 20%, from $79.1 billion in the prior year. The earning assets in C&IS consisted primarily of intercompanyassets and Loans and Leases. Funding sources were primarily comprised of non-U.S. custody-related interest-bearing deposits, which averaged $60.5 billion in 2020, increased from $54.9 billion in 2019.
C&IS Provision for Credit Losses
On January 1, 2020, the Corporation adopted ASU 2016-13. For more information on the adoption, please refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The C&IS Provision for Credit Losses was a provision of $38.1 million for 2020 and $1.9 million for 2019. The 2020 provision reflected an increase in the reserve evaluated on a collective basis driven by current and projected economic conditions and downgrades in the portfolio, both resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts on the commercial and institutional portfolio. The 2019 provision reflected an increase to the inherent reserve for outstanding loans due to lower credit quality, partially offset by a decrease to the specific reserve related to standby letters of credit and outstanding loans.
C&IS Noninterest Expense
Total C&IS Noninterest Expense, which includes the direct expense of the reporting segment, indirect expense allocations for product and operating support, and indirect expense allocations for certain corporate support services, increased in 2020 from 2019. The increase primarily reflects higher expense allocations, including a $43.4 million charge related to a corporate action processing error, higher Compensation expense, Employee Benefits, Outside Services, and Equipment and Software expense, partially offset by lower business promotion expense due to reduced business travel and lower staff-related expenses.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 47

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Wealth Management
Wealth Management focuses on high-net-worth individuals and families, business owners, executives, professionals, retirees, and established privately-held businesses in its target markets. The business also includes the Global Family Office, which provides customized services to meet the complex financial needs of individuals and family offices in the United States and throughout the world with assets typically exceeding $200 million. In supporting these targeted segments, Wealth Management provides trust, investment management, custody, and philanthropic services; financial consulting; guardianship and estate administration; family business consulting; family financial education; brokerage services; and private and business banking. Wealth Management is one of the largest providers of advisory services in the United States with $622.9 billion ofassets under custody/administration, assets under custody, and $278.6 billion of assets under management of $879.4 billion, $875.1 billion, and $347.8 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2018.2020. Wealth Management services are delivered by multidisciplinary teams through a network of offices in 1819 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., as well as offices in London, Guernsey, and Abu Dhabi.

52   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The following table summarizes the results of operations of Wealth Management for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018 on a management-reporting basis.


TABLE 22:27: WEALTH MANAGEMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Noninterest Income
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$1,673.4 $1,640.6 $1,580.6 2 %%
Foreign Exchange Trading Income14.1 18.7 4.2 (25)N/M
Other Noninterest Income168.0 131.1 102.7 28 28 
Total Noninterest Income1,855.5 1,790.4 1,687.5 4 
Net Interest Income(1)
812.1 792.0 816.5 3 (3)
Revenue(1)
2,667.6 2,582.4 2,504.0 3 
Provision for Credit Losses86.9 (16.4)(16.4)N/M— 
Noninterest Expense1,559.7 1,531.6 1,460.0 2 
Income before Income Taxes(1)
1,021.0 1,067.2 1,060.4 (4)
Provision for Income Taxes(1)
291.8 271.1 262.1 8 
Net Income$729.2 $796.1 $798.3 (8)%— %
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income60 %53 %51 %
Average Assets$32,020.5 $29,994.3 $26,163.7 7 %15 %
                        FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
Noninterest Income     
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$1,580.6
$1,449.7
$1,320.3
9 %10 %
Foreign Exchange Trading Income4.2
3.1
8.6
35
(64)
Other Noninterest Income102.7
103.9
105.7
(1)(2)
Net Interest Income (Note)816.5
736.2
651.4
11
13
Revenue (Note)2,504.0
2,292.9
2,086.0
9
10
Provision for Credit Losses(16.4)(31.4)(27.9)(48)13
Noninterest Expense1,460.0
1,405.3
1,315.3
4
7
Income before Income Taxes (Note)1,060.4
919.0
798.6
15
15
Provision for Income Taxes (Note)262.1
347.2
301.1
(25)15
Net Income$798.3
$571.8
$497.5
40 %15 %
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income51%48%48%



Average Assets$26,163.7
$26,599.9
$26,525.0
(2)% %

Note: Stated(1) Non-GAAP financial measures stated on an FTE basis.


Wealth Management net income increased 40%Net Income
Wealth Management Net Income decreased in 2018,2020, primarily reflecting a higher trust, investment and other servicing fees, a lower provisionProvision for income taxes,Credit Losses and higher net interest income,Noninterest Expense, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. The 15% increase in Wealth Management net income in 2017 from 2016 is primarily attributable to higher trust, investment and other servicing fees and net interest income, partially offset by higher noninterest expense and a higher provision for income taxes.

Revenue.
Wealth Management Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees
Provided below is a summaryFor an explanation of Wealth Management trust, investmentTrust, Investment, and other servicing feesOther Servicing Fees, please see the “Trust, Investment, and assets under custody and under management.

TABLE 23: WEALTH MANAGEMENT TRUST, INVESTMENT AND OTHER SERVICING FEES
                        FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
Central$607.8
$575.5
$523.8
6%10%
East401.7
356.2
334.4
13
7
West320.0
291.7
268.9
10
8
Global Family Office251.1
226.3
193.2
11
17
Total Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$1,580.6
$1,449.7
$1,320.3
9%10%

2018 WEALTH MANAGEMENT FEES
chart-243c67dda1605fa68bf.jpg
n39% Central
n25% East
n20% West
n16% Global Family Office

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 53

TableOther Servicing Fees” section within the Consolidated Results of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


TABLE 24: WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
                          DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Billions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
Global Family Office$405.5
$422.9
$347.7
(4)%22%
Central88.2
94.8
83.8
(7)13
East72.7
70.5
61.7
3
14
West56.5
57.3
50.4
(1)14
Total Assets Under Custody$622.9
$645.5
$543.6
(4)%19%

2018WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY
chart-d8d5a72031f95a82acf.jpg
n65% Global Family Office
n14% Central
n12% East
n9% West

TABLE 25: WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
                          DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Billions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
Central$96.2
$102.1
$89.7
(6)%14%
Global Family Office83.5
87.1
69.3
(4)26
East57.0
57.0
50.9

12
West41.9
43.6
38.5
(4)13
Total Assets Under Management$278.6
$289.8
$248.4
(4)%17%

2018 WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT    
chart-8ef8ca5515a9532996c.jpg
n35% Central
n30% Global Family Office
n20% East
n15% West


54   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


2018WEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY INVESTMENT TYPE
chart-e5f218cbde355723a9a.jpg
n47% Equities
n27% Cash and Other Assets
n26% Fixed Income Securities

The Wealth Management regions shown above are comprisedOperations section of the following: Central includes Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio and Wisconsin; East includes Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, New York and Washington, D.C.; West includes Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Texas and Washington. Global Family Office provides specialized asset management, investment consulting, global custody, fiduciary, and private banking services to ultra-wealthy domestic and international clients.MD&A.
Wealth Management fee income is calculated primarily based on market values. Wealth Management trust, investment and other servicing fees were $1.58 billion in 2018, up $130.9 million, or 9%, from $1.45 billion in 2017, which in turn were up $129.4 million, or 10%, from $1.32 billion in 2016. The results in 2018 benefited from favorable markets, a change in presentation of certain fees resulting from the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard, and new business. The 10% increase in trust, investment and other servicing fees in 2017 compared to 2016 was attributable to favorable markets and new business.
At December 31, 2018, assets under custody in Wealth Management were $622.9 billion compared with $645.5 billion at December 31, 2017. Assets under management were $278.6 billion at December 31, 2018 compared to $289.8 billion at the previous year end.

Wealth Management Foreign Exchange Trading Income
Foreign exchange trading income totaled $4.2 million in 2018, a $1.1 million, or 35%, increase from $3.1 million in 2017. The increase is attributable to higher client volumes and market volatility. Foreign exchange trading income in 2017 decreased $5.5 million, or 64%, as compared to 2016, reflecting lower volatility and client volumes.

Wealth Management Other Noninterest Income
Other noninterest incomeNoninterest Income for 2018 totaled $102.7 million, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 1%,2020 increased from $103.9 million in 2017,2019, primarily due to decreases in treasury management fees.Security Commissions and Trading Income, Other noninterest income in 2017 decreased $1.8 million, or 2%, as compared to 2016, primarily reflecting decreases in banking feesOperating Income, and credit-related service charges.

Treasury Management Fees.
Wealth Management Net Interest Income
Net interest incomeInterest Income on an FTE basis was $816.5 million for 2018, up $80.3 million, or 11%,2020 increased from $736.2 million in 2017,2019, primarily attributable to a higher net interest allocation from Treasury and Other and an increase in earning assets, partially offset by a decrease in the net interest margin, partially offset by a decline in earning assets.margin. Net interest margin on an FTE basis increaseddecreased to 3.16%2.94% from 2.80%, reflecting higher yields on earning assets.3.06%. Average earning assets totaled $25.9of $29.5 billion in 2018, down $469.9 million,2020, increased $1.5 billion, or 2%5%, in the current year from $26.3$28.0 billion in 2017. Net interest income on an FTE basis in 2017 increased $84.8 million, or 13%, from 2016 and the net interest margin on an FTE basis in 2017 of 2.80% increased from the 2016 net interest margin of 2.48%. The higher net interest margin in 2017 as compared to 2016 was attributable to higher yields on earning assets.2019. Earning assets and funding sources in 2018, 2017, and 2016for the year ended December 31, 2020 were primarily comprised of loans and domestic interest-bearing deposits, respectively.


Wealth Management Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses was a credit of $16.4 million for 2018, compared to a credit of $31.4 million in 2017, and a credit of $27.9 million in 2016. The 2018 provision credit was primarily driven by improved credit quality and reductions in outstanding loans, standby letters of credit, and undrawn commitments, which resulted in a reduction of the inherent allowance. The 2017 provision credit wasprimarily driven by improvement in the credit quality of the commercial real estate and residential real estate portfolios, partially offset by charge-offs. The 2016 provision credit was primarily driven by improvement in the credit quality of the residential real estate and private client portfolios.


201848 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation55

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Wealth Management Provision for Credit Losses
On January 1, 2020, the Corporation adopted ASU 2016-13. For more information on the adoption, please refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The Wealth Management Provision for Credit Losses was $86.9 million in 2020 as compared to a credit provision of $16.4 million in 2019. The 2020 provision reflected an increase in the reserve evaluated on a collective basis driven by current and projected economic conditions and downgrades in the portfolio, both resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts, primarily impacting the commercial real estate and commercial and institutional portfolios. The 2019 credit provision was primarily driven by a reduction in outstanding loans and improved credit quality in the residential real estate portfolio, which resulted in a reduction of the inherent allowance.
Wealth Management Noninterest Expense
Total noninterest expense,Noninterest Expense, which includes the direct expense of the reporting segment, indirect expense allocations for product and operating support, and indirect expense allocations for certain corporate support services, totaled $1.46 billionincreased in 2018, an increase of $54.7 million, or 4%,2020 from $1.41 billion in the prior year.2019. The increase was primarily due toreflects higher indirect expense allocations and compensation expense. NoninterestEmployee Benefits, partially offset by lower business promotion expense for 2017 increased $90.0 million, or 7%, from $1.32 billion in 2016. The increase was primarily due to higher indirect expense allocations, severance-related charges, compensation expense, and outside services expense in 2017.reduced business travel.
Treasury and Other
Beginning January 1, 2019, Treasury and Other includes income and expenses associated with non-recurring activities such as certain costs associated with acquisitions, divestitures, litigation, restructuring, and tax adjustments. For reporting periods ended prior to January 1, 2019, income and expense associated with the wholesale funding activities and the investment portfolios of the Corporation and the Bank. Treasury and Other also includesBank, as well as certain corporate-based expense, executive levelexecutive-level compensation and nonrecurring items, were not allocated to C&IS and Wealth Management, and are reported in Treasury and Other. Treasury and Other information for 2020 and 2019 is not directly comparable to information for 2018 due to the enhanced segment reporting methodology beginning January 1, 2019. Also beginning January 1, 2019, net interest income and average assets are allocated to the C&IS and Wealth Management reporting segments.
The following table summarizes the results of operations of Treasury and Other for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018 on a management-reporting basis.


TABLE 26:28: TREASURY AND OTHER RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Millions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Noninterest Income$(18.3)$(17.1)$60.5 N/MN/M
Net Interest Income(1)
 — (144.8)N/MN/M
Revenue(1)
(18.3)(17.1)(84.3)N/MN/M
Noninterest Expense35.8 6.4 135.5 N/MN/M
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes(1)
(54.1)(23.5)(219.8)N/MN/M
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes(1)
(13.5)(5.8)(74.8)N/MN/M
Net Income$(40.6)$(17.7)$(145.0)N/MN/M
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income(3)%(1)%(9)%
Average Assets$ $— $13,786.4 N/MN/M
                        FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,            CHANGE
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
Noninterest Income$60.5
$30.8
$133.1
96 %(77)%
Net Interest Income (Note)(144.8)5.0
43.6
N/M
(89)
Revenue (Note)(84.3)35.8
176.7
N/M
(80)
Noninterest Expense135.5
169.6
143.2
(20)18
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes (Note)(219.8)(133.8)33.5
64
N/M
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes (Note)(74.8)(146.0)(4.3)(49)N/M
Net Income$(145.0)$12.2
$37.8
N/M
(68)%
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income(9)%1%4%



Average Assets$13,786.4
$12,901.9
$12,850.6
7 % %

Note: Stated(1) Non-GAAP financial measures stated on an FTE basis.

Treasury and Other noninterest incomeNoninterest Income
Noninterest Income in 2018 was $60.5 million compared to $30.8 million in 2017. The increase primarily reflects an increase in foreign exchange trading income, a component of other noninterest income,2020 decreased from 2019 due to higher foreign exchangeexpenses for existing swap activity in Treasury and increased market volatility, partially offset by decreases in various other operating income categories.agreements related to Visa Inc. Class B common shares.

Treasury and Other net interest income on an FTE basisNoninterest Expense
Noninterest Expense in 2018 was a loss of $144.8 million, down $149.8 million2020 increased from $5.0 million in 2017. The decrease reflected a decline in the net interest margin. Net interest income on an FTE basis in 2017 decreased $38.6 million, or 89%, to $5.0 million from $43.6 million in 2016. The decrease reflected a decline in the net interest margin and lower levels of earning assets.
Treasury and Other noninterest expense in 2018 equaled $135.5 million, down $34.1 million, or 20%, from $169.6 million in 2017. The decrease is primarily attributable to an increase in indirect expense allocations to C&IS and Wealth Management and lower compensation expense, partially offset by higher general overhead costs, including equipment and software expense and outside services expense.
The benefit from income taxes was $74.8 million in 2018, down from $146.0 million in the prior year,2019, primarily due to the reductioncosts associated with workplace real estate strategies and higher Compensation expense related to a one-time supplemental payment to employees in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% as a result of the TCJA enacted in the fourth quarter of 2017, the higher net benefit recorded in the prior year attributableresponse to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of $53.1 million compared to the current year net benefit of $4.8 million, a tax benefit recognized in 2018 resulting from a change in accounting method regarding the timing of tax deductions for software-related expenses of $24.4 million, Federal and State research tax credits of $17.6 million recorded in the prior year related to the Corporation’s technology spend between 2013 and 2016, and a reduction in the income tax benefit derived from the vesting of restricted stock units and stock option exercises compared to the prior year, partially offset by lower income before income taxes.COVID-19 pandemic.



56   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation49


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Asset Management
Asset Management, through the Corporation’s various subsidiaries, supports the C&IS and Wealth Management reporting segments by providing a broad range of asset management and related services and other products to clients around the world. Investment solutions are delivered through separately managed accounts, bank common and collective funds, registered investment companies, exchange traded funds, non-U.S. collective investment funds, and unregistered private investment funds. Asset Management’s capabilities include active and passive equity; active and passive fixed income; cash management; multi-asset and alternative asset classes (such as private equity and hedge funds of funds); and multi-manager advisory services and products. Asset Management’s activities also include overlay services and other risk management services. Asset Management operates internationally through subsidiaries and distribution arrangements and its revenue and expense are allocated fully to C&IS and Wealth Management.
At December 31, 2018,2020, Northern Trust managed $1.07$1.41 trillion in assets for personal and institutional clients, including $790.8 billion$1.06 trillion for C&IS clients and $278.6$347.8 billion for Wealth Management clients. The following table presents consolidated assets under management as of December 31, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018 by investment type.


TABLE 27:29: CONSOLIDATED ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY INVESTMENT TYPE
                         DECEMBER 31,            CHANGEDECEMBER 31,CHANGE
($ In Billions)2018
2017
2016
2018 / 2017
2017 / 2016
($ In Billions)2020201920182020 / 20192019 / 2018
Equities$534.2
$592.3
$480.6
(10)%23%Equities$733.7 $650.8 $534.2 13 %22 %
Fixed Income Securities178.3
183.5
160.5
(3)14
Fixed Income Securities204.8 193.8 178.3 6 
Cash and Other Assets207.0
217.5
189.3
(5)15
Cash and Other Assets279.9 223.6 207.0 25 
Securities Lending Collateral149.9
167.7
112.0
(11)50
Securities Lending Collateral186.9 163.1 149.9 15 
Total Assets Under Management$1,069.4
$1,161.0
$942.4
(8)%23%Total Assets Under Management$1,405.3 $1,231.3 $1,069.4 14 %15 %

Assets under management decreased $91.6 billion, or 8%, from $1.16 trillionincreased at year-end 2017.2020 from year-end 2019. The decreaseincrease primarily reflected unfavorablefavorable markets and net outflows.inflows. The following table presents activity in consolidated assets under management by investment typeproduct during the yearyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.


TABLE 28:30: ACTIVITY IN CONSOLIDATED ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY INVESTMENT TYPEPRODUCT
($ In Billions)2018
2017
2016
Balance as of January 1,$1,161.0
$942.4
$875.3
Inflows by Investment Type   
 Equities174.7
192.1
136.0
 Fixed Income Securities63.7
68.1
59.3
 Cash and Other Assets484.3
407.9
383.4
 Securities Lending Collateral165.6
132.4
93.8
     
Total Inflows888.3
800.5
672.5
     
Outflows by Investment Type   
 Equities(179.2)(185.7)(136.1)
 Fixed Income Securities(72.5)(57.2)(48.0)
 Cash and Other Assets(487.4)(384.0)(363.6)
 Securities Lending Collateral(183.3)(76.7)(85.7)
     
Total Outflows(922.4)(703.6)(633.4)
     
Net (Outflows) / Inflows(34.1)96.9
39.1
     
Market Performance, Currency and Other   
 Market Performance and Other(49.3)111.6
32.0
 Currency(8.2)10.1
(4.0)
Total Market Performance, Currency and Other(57.5)121.7
28.0
     
Balance as of December 31,$1,069.4
$1,161.0
$942.4

($ In Billions)202020192018
Balance as of January 1$1,231.3 $1,069.4 $1,161.0 
Inflows by Product
Equities193.0 193.6 174.7 
Fixed Income65.0 48.1 63.7 
Cash and Other Assets802.4 551.6 484.3 
Securities Lending Collateral268.8 260.5 165.6 
Total Inflows1,329.2 1,053.8 888.3 
Outflows by Product
Equities(212.6)(205.5)(179.2)
Fixed Income(68.5)(49.7)(72.5)
Cash and Other Assets(746.5)(541.0)(487.4)
Securities Lending Collateral(245.0)(247.3)(183.3)
Total Outflows(1,272.6)(1,043.5)(922.4)
Net Inflows (Outflows)56.6 10.3 (34.1)
Market Performance, Currency & Other
Market Performance & Other109.1 151.1 (49.3)
Currency8.3 0.5 (8.2)
Total Market Performance, Currency & Other117.4 151.6 (57.5)
Balance as of December 31$1,405.3 $1,231.3 $1,069.4 



201850 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation57

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET REVIEW
The following tables summarize selected consolidated balance sheet information.
TABLE 31: SELECT CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
($ In Billions)DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019CHANGE
Assets
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other(1)
$55.4 $33.8 $21.6 64 %
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(2)
6.6 7.0 (0.4)(5)
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell1.6 0.7 0.9 126 
Total Securities(3)
61.1 52.3 8.8 17 
Loans and Leases33.8 31.4 2.4 
Total Earning Assets158.5 125.2 33.3 27 
Total Assets170.0 136.8 33.2 24 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits100.8 82.8 18.0 22 
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits43.1 26.3 16.8 64 
Federal Funds Purchased0.3 0.6 (0.3)(53)
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase 0.5 (0.5)(92)
Other Borrowings4.0 6.7 (2.7)(41)
Total Stockholders’ Equity11.7 11.1 0.6 
(1)    Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other includes collateral deposits with certain securities depositories and clearing houses for the purpose of presenting earning assets; such deposits are presented in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
(2)    Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks includes the interest-bearing component of Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks as presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
(3)    Total Securities includes certain community development investments and Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve stock, which are classified in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

TABLE 32: SELECT AVERAGE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
($ In Billions)20202019CHANGE
Assets
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other(1)
$27.9 $18.5 $9.4 51 %
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(2)
5.4 6.0 (0.6)(10)
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell1.2 0.8 0.4 50 
Total Securities(3)
56.1 50.7 5.4 11 
Loans and Leases33.5 31.1 2.4 
Total Earning Assets124.1 107.1 17.0 16 
Total Assets136.8 117.6 19.2 16 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits85.1 72.3 12.8 18 
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits23.4 17.5 5.9 34 
Federal Funds Purchased1.0 1.3 (0.3)(23)
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase0.2 0.3 (0.1)(36)
Other Borrowings6.4 7.8 (1.4)(17)
Total Stockholders’ Equity11.2 10.6 0.6 
(1)    Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other includes collateral deposits with certain securities depositories and clearing houses for the purpose of presenting earning assets; such deposits are presented in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
(2)    Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks includes the interest-bearing component of Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks as presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
(3)    Total Securities includes certain community development investments and Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve stock, which are classified in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Average balances are considered to be a better measure of balance sheet trends, as period-end balances can be impacted by the timing of deposit and withdrawal activity involving large client balances. The current growth in both the period-end and average consolidated balance sheets was primarily driven by higher customer deposit balances.
Stockholders’ Equity. The increase in average Stockholders’ Equity was primarily attributable to earnings and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income since the prior year, partially offset by the repurchase of common stock

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 51

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ASSET QUALITYpursuant to the Corporation’s share repurchase program, the net redemption of preferred stock during the first quarter of 2020, and dividend declarations. During the first quarter of 2020, proceeds from the Series E Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock issuance in the fourth quarter of 2019 were used to fund the redemption of all outstanding shares of the Corporation’s Series C Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $400 million, which was $11.5 million in excess of the net carrying value of the shares. The $11.5 million excess is included in preferred stock dividends in the determination of net income available to common shareholders.
The Corporation suspended its open-market share repurchase program on March 16, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Corporation repurchased 3,276,589 shares of common stock, including 532,713 shares withheld related to share-based compensation, at a total cost of $299.8 million ($91.49 average price per share).
Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, the Federal Reserve announced certain measures to ensure that large financial institutions, including Northern Trust, remain resilient despite the economic uncertainty resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, for the third and fourth quarters of 2020, no share repurchases were permitted by these institutions and dividend payments were limited to the amount paid in the second quarter and could not exceed the payor’s average net income for the four preceding quarters. On December 18, 2020, the Federal Reserve again extended its capital distribution limits into the first quarter of 2021 with certain modifications, which include continuing to limit dividend payments based on recent income and limiting share repurchases based on recent income. During the first quarter of 2021, the Corporation restarted its share repurchase program in accordance with such limitations.
Asset Quality

Securities Portfolio
The following table presents the book valuesremaining maturity and average yield of Northern Trust’sTrust's held to maturity and available for sale and trading investmentdebt securities by security type as of December 31, 2018, 20172020.

TABLE 33: REMAINING MATURITY AND AVERAGE YIELD OF DEBT SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY AND AVAILABLE FOR SALE
DECEMBER 31, 2020
TOTALONE YEAR OR LESSONE TO FIVE YEARSFIVE TO TEN YEARSOVER TEN YEARSAVERAGE
MATURITY
($ in Millions)BOOKYIELDBOOKYIELDBOOKYIELDBOOKYIELDBOOKYIELD
Debt Securities Held to Maturity
U.S. Government$90.0 0.06%$90.0 0.06%$ —%$  %$ —%2 mo.
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions2.1 5.471.4 5.370.7 5.64   6 mos.
Government Sponsored Agency3.0 4.860.5 4.831.3 4.850.8 4.88 0.4 4.8560 mos.
Other – Fixed15,130.6 0.2911,000.7 0.113,572.4 0.76440.9 0.67 116.6 1.3113 mos.
 – Floating2,565.4 0.42501.0 0.272,032.8 0.4631.6 0.41  40 mos.
Total Debt Securities Held to Maturity$17,791.1 0.31%$11,593.6 0.12%$5,607.2 0.65%$473.3 0.66 %$117.0 1.32%17 mos.
Debt Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Government$2,799.9 1.66%$303.2 1.86%$1,767.0 1.72%$729.7 1.43 %$ —%39 mos.
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions3,083.6 2.108.0 1.66266.8 2.302,718.4 2.09 90.4 1.6490 mos.
Government Sponsored Agency24,956.7 1.405,613.6 1.489,063.0 1.487,793.6 1.26 2,486.5 1.3960 mos.
Asset-Backed – Fixed3,274.1 2.18537.4 2.392,094.3 1.94642.4 2.80  30 mos.
Asset-Backed – Floating1,755.2 1.410.7 1.311,284.6 1.47372.9 1.55 97.0 0.1187 mos.
Other – Fixed5,150.8 1.88821.7 1.293,912.8 0.54416.3 0.56  32 mos.
 – Floating1,001.7 0.62314.1 0.64687.6 0.62   19 mos.
Total Debt Securities Available for Sale$42,022.0 1.57%$7,598.7 1.51%$19,076.1 1.67%$12,673.3 1.51 %$2,673.9 1.35%55 mos.
Note: Yield is calculated on amortized cost and 2016.presented on a taxable equivalent basis giving effect to the applicable federal and state tax rates.


TABLE 29: SECURITIES PORTFOLIO

52 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

                          DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Debt Securities Held to Maturity   
U.S. Government$101.6
$35.0
$15.0
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions18.9
34.6
63.6
Government Sponsored Agency4.5
5.8
7.4
Other14,229.0
12,973.6
8,835.1
Total Debt Securities Held to Maturity$14,354.0
$13,049.0
$8,921.1
Debt Securities Available for Sale   
U.S. Government$5,185.3
$5,700.3
$7,522.6
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions655.9
746.4
885.2
Government Sponsored Agency22,424.6
18,676.6
17,892.8
Asset-Backed3,244.9
2,726.4
2,556.7
Auction Rate
4.3
4.7
Other5,378.1
5,888.1
6,717.8
Total Debt Securities Available for Sale$36,888.8
$33,742.1
$35,579.8
Trading Account$0.3
$0.5
$0.3
Total Debt Securities at Year-End$51,243.1
$46,791.6
$44,501.2
Average Total Securities$50,281.5
$44,715.7
$42,041.3
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Northern Trust maintains a high quality debt securities portfolio, with 79%portfolio. Debt securities not explicitly rated were grouped where possible under the credit rating of the combinedissuer of the security. The following tables provide the fair value of debt securities available for sale and amortized cost of debt securities held to maturity and trading account portfolios at December 31, 2018 composedby credit rating.

TABLE 34: FAIR VALUE OF DEBT SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE BY CREDIT RATING
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020
($ In Millions)AAAAAANOT RATEDTOTAL
U.S. Government$2,799.9 $ $ $ $2,799.9 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions918.1 2,165.5   3,083.6 
Government Sponsored Agency24,956.7    24,956.7 
Non-U.S. Government669.8 38.8 5.4  714.0 
Corporate Debt426.3 790.0 1,123.5 199.8 2,539.6 
Covered Bonds453.3  24.9 74.9 553.1 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds1,622.0 566.0 157.8  2,345.8 
Other Asset-Backed3,947.5   50.0 3,997.5 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed1,031.8    1,031.8 
Total$36,825.4 $3,560.3 $1,311.6 $324.7 $42,022.0 
Percent of Total88 %8 %3 %1 %100 %
The 1% of U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencydebt securities and triple-A rated corporate notes, asset-backed securities, covered bonds, sub-sovereign, supranational, sovereign & non-U.S. agency bonds, commercial mortgage-backed securities and obligations of states and political subdivisions. The remaining portfolio was composed of corporate notes, negotiable certificates of deposit, obligations of states and political subdivisions, and other securities, of which as a percentage of the total securities portfolio, 8% were rated double-A, 2% were rated below double-A, and 11% wereavailable for sale not rated by Moody’s Investors Service, or Standard and Poor’s (primarily non-U.S. sovereign securities whose long-term ratings are at least A).
At December 31, 2018, 26%or Fitch Ratings primarily consisted of corporate debt, wascovered bonds, and other asset-backed securities.

TABLE 35: AMORTIZED COST OF DEBT SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY BY CREDIT RATING
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020
($ In Millions)AAAAAABBBNOT RATEDTOTAL
U.S. Government$90.0 $ $ $ $ $90.0 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions 1.0  1.1  2.1 
Government Sponsored Agency3.0     3.0 
Non-U.S. Government319.8 1,337.4 6,630.6 48.8  8,336.6 
Corporate Debt3.8 279.1 305.1   588.0 
Covered Bonds3,184.6     3,184.6 
Certificates of Deposit    807.2 807.2 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds2,590.9 1,057.1    3,648.0 
Other Asset-Backed677.0     677.0 
Other    454.6 454.6 
Total$6,869.1 $2,674.6 $6,935.7 $49.9 $1,261.8 $17,791.1 
Percent of Total39 %15 %39 % %7 %100 %
The 7% of debt securities held to maturity not rated triple-A, 40% was rated double-A,by Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and 34% was rated below double-APoor’s or not rated. Securities classified as “other asset-backed” at December 31, 2018 had average livesFitch Ratings consisted of certificates of deposit with a remaining life of less than 5 years,six months as well as investments purchased by Northern Trust to fulfill its obligations under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). Northern Trust fulfills its obligations under the CRA by making qualified investments for purposes of supporting institutions and 100% were rated triple-A.programs that benefit low-to-moderate income communities within Northern Trust’s market area.
Unrealized lossesNet unrealized gains within the debtinvestment securities portfolio at December 31, 2018 were $357.1 million as compared to $249.4totaled $872.6 million at December 31, 2017,2020, compared to net unrealized gains of $118.9 million as of December 31, 2019. Net unrealized gains as of December 31, 2020 were comprised of $981.9 million and $109.3 million of gross unrealized gains and losses, respectively.
As of December 31, 2020, the $42.0 billion debt securities available for sale portfolio had unrealized losses of $26.9 million and $2.8 million related to government-sponsored agency and other asset-backed securities, respectively, which are primarily reflecting higherattributable to changes in market interest rates and credit spreads since purchase; 37%their purchase.
As of December 31, 2020, the $17.8 billion debt securities held to maturity portfolio had an unrealized loss of $76.5 million related to other residential mortgage-backed securities, which is primarily attributable to changes in overall market interest rates and credit spreads since their purchase.
As of December 31, 2020, 16% of the corporate debt securities available for sale portfolio iswas backed by guarantees provided by U.S. and non-U.S. governmentalgovernment entities. There were $0.5 million
For additional information relating to the securities portfolio, refer to Note 4, “Securities,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and $0.2 million of losses recognizedSupplementary Data.”
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 53

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Northern Trust participates in 2018 and 2017, respectively, in connection with the write-down of CRA securities determined to be OTTI. There were $3.7 million OTTI losses recognized in 2016.
repurchase agreement market as a relatively low cost alternative for short-term funding. Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as collateralized financings and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were acquired or sold plus accrued interest. To minimize any potential credit risk associated with these transactions, the fair value of the securities purchased or sold is monitored, limits are set on exposure with counterparties, and the financial condition of counterparties is regularly assessed. It is Northern Trust’s policy to take possession, either directly or via third-party custodians, of securities purchased under agreements to resell. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are held by the counterparty until the repurchase.
For additional information relating to the securities sold under agreements to repurchase, refer to Note 5, “Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

58   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



Loans and Leases
During 2017,2020, the Corporation implemented a change in the classification of certain loans and leases to enhance the consistency of its reporting across various regulatory regimes. As a result, the loan and lease balances for periods ended prior to January 1, 2017as of December 31, 2019 below have been adjusted to conform to the presentation for periods ended after such date.revised presentation. The 2020 adjustments generally reflectedreflect reclassification of loans and leases from the commercial and institutionalreal estate class to thecommercial and institutional, residential real estate, class.and private client classes. There was no impact on total loansLoans and Leases previously reported.
For additional information relating to the loan and leases previously reported.portfolio, refer to Note 6, “Loans and Leases,” and Note 8 “Concentrations of Credit Risk” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”


The following table presents the amounts outstandingremaining maturity of loans and leases by segment and class as of December 31, 2018 and the preceding four year-ends.2020.


TABLE 30: COMPOSITION36: REMAINING MATURITY OF LOAN PORTFOLIO
LOANS AND LEASES
DECEMBER 31, 2020
                       DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
(In Millions)(In Millions)TOTALONE YEAR OR LESSONE TO FIVE YEARSFIVE TO FIFTEEN
YEARS
OVER FIFTEEN YEARS
U.S.:U.S.:
Commercial Commercial
Commercial and Institutional$8,728.1
$9,042.2
$9,287.4
$9,307.5
$8,343.7
Commercial and Institutional$10,058.3 $3,850.3 $5,635.0 $566.3 $6.7 
Commercial Real Estate3,228.8
3,482.7
4,002.5
3,848.8
3,333.3
Commercial Real Estate3,558.4 470.3 2,314.4 769.1 4.6 
Non-U.S.2,701.6
1,538.5
1,877.8
1,137.7
1,530.6
Lease Financing, net90.7
229.2
293.9
544.4
916.3
Lease Financing, net11.4   11.4  
Other426.0
265.4
205.1
194.1
191.5
Other288.2 288.2    
Total Commercial$15,175.2
$14,558.0
$15,666.7
$15,032.5
$14,315.4
Personal
 Personal
Private Client$10,733.3
$10,753.1
$10,052.0
$9,136.4
$7,466.9
Private Client11,815.1 7,978.6 3,499.3 335.3 1.9 
Residential Real Estate6,514.0
7,247.6
8,077.5
8,974.7
9,820.8
Residential Real Estate6,035.7 125.6 324.4 910.3 4,675.4 
Other67.5
33.5
25.9
37.3
37.1
Other49.0 49.0    
Total Personal$17,314.8
$18,034.2
$18,155.4
$18,148.4
$17,324.8
Total U.S.Total U.S.$31,816.1 $12,762.0 $11,773.1 $2,592.4 $4,688.6 
Non-U.S.:Non-U.S.:
Non-U.S. - CommercialNon-U.S. - Commercial$1,345.7 $1,203.4 $142.3 $ $ 
Non-U.S. - PersonalNon-U.S. - Personal597.9 469.5 82.7 31.8 13.9 
Total Non-U.S.Total Non-U.S.$1,943.6 $1,672.9 $225.0 $31.8 $13.9 
Total Loans and Leases$32,490.0
$32,592.2
$33,822.1
$33,180.9
$31,640.2
Total Loans and Leases$33,759.7 $14,434.9 $11,998.1 $2,624.2 $4,702.5 

Residential Real Estate
The residential real estate loan portfolio isNote: Non-U.S. loans primarily composed of mortgages and home equity credit lines provided as an accommodationinclude short duration exposures related to clients. Residential real estate loans totaled $6.5 billion at December 31, 2018, or 22% of total U.S. loans, compared with $7.2 billion, or 23% of total U.S. loans, at December 31, 2017. All residential real estate loans are underwritten utilizing Northern Trust’s credit policies, which do not support the origination of loan types generally considered to be of high risk in nature, such as option ARM loans, subprime loans, loans with initial “teaser” rates, and loans with excessively high loan-to-value ratios. Residential real estate loans consist of traditional first lien mortgages and equity credit lines that generally require a loan-to-collateral value of no more than 65% to 80% at inception. Appraisals of supporting collateral for residential real estate loans are obtained at loan origination and upon refinancing or default or when otherwise considered warranted. Residential real estate collateral appraisals are performed and reviewed by independent third parties.
Of the total $6.5 billion in residential real estate loans at December 31, 2018, $1.7 billion were in Florida, $1.3 billion were in California, and $1.2 billion were in the greater Chicago area, with the remainder distributed throughout the other geographic regions within the United States served by Northern Trust. Legally binding commitments to extend residential real estate credit, which are primarily equity credit lines, totaled $824.0 million and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Commercial Real Estate
In managing its credit exposure, management has defined a commercial real estate loan as one where: (1) the borrower’s principal business activity is the acquisition or the development of real estate for commercial purposes; (2) the principal collateral is real estate held for commercial purposes, and loan repayment is expected to flow from the operation of the property; or (3) the loan repayment is expected to flow from the sale or refinance of real estate as a normal and ongoing part of the business. Unsecured lines of credit to firms or individuals engaged in commercial real estate endeavors are included without regard to the use of loan proceeds. The commercial real estate portfolio consists of commercial mortgages and construction, acquisition and development loans extended primarily to investors well known to Northern Trust. Underwriting standards generally reflect conservative loan-to-value ratios and debt service coverage requirements. Recourse to owners through guarantees also is commonly required.

custodied client investments.



201854 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation59

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


TABLE 37: INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY OF LOANS AND LEASES
Commercial mortgage financing is provided for the acquisition or refinancing of income-producing properties. Cash flows from the properties generally are sufficient to amortize the loan. These loans are primarily located in the California, Illinois, Florida, Texas, and Arizona markets. Construction, acquisition and development loans provide financing for commercial real estate prior to rental income stabilization. The intent is generally that the borrower will sell the project or refinance the loan through a commercial mortgage with Northern Trust or another financial institution upon completion.
DECEMBER 31, 2020
(In Millions)TOTALONE YEAR
OR LESS
ONE TO FIVE
YEARS
FIVE TO FIFTEEN
YEARS
OVER FIFTEEN YEARS
Fixed Rate:
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional$548.7 $97.6 $392.6 $57.1 $1.4 
Commercial Real Estate190.5 28.0 108.0 54.5  
Total Commercial$739.2 $125.6 $500.6 $111.6 $1.4 
Personal
Private Client$423.9 $88.9 $239.3 $94.8 $0.9 
Residential Real Estate920.5 3.7 39.8 570.0 307.0 
Total Personal$1,344.4 $92.6 $279.1 $664.8 $307.9 
Total Fixed Rate$2,083.6 $218.2 $779.7 $776.4 $309.3 
Variable Rate:
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional$9,509.6 $3,752.7 $5,242.4 $509.2 $5.3 
Commercial Real Estate3,367.9 442.3 2,206.4 714.6 4.6 
Non-U.S.1,345.7 1,203.4 142.3   
Lease Financing, net11.4   11.4  
Other288.2 288.2    
Total Commercial$14,522.8 $5,686.6 $7,591.1 $1,235.2 $9.9 
Personal
Private Client$11,391.2 $7,889.7 $3,260.0 $240.5 $1.0 
Residential Real Estate5,115.2 121.9 284.6 340.3 4,368.4 
Non-U.S.597.9 469.5 82.7 31.8 13.9 
Other49.0 49.0    
Total Personal$17,153.3 $8,530.1 $3,627.3 $612.6 $4,383.3 
Total Variable Rate$31,676.1 $14,216.7 $11,218.4 $1,847.8 $4,393.2 
Total Loans and Leases$33,759.7 $14,434.9 $11,998.1 $2,624.2 $4,702.5 
The table below provides additional detail regarding commercial real estate loan types:

TABLE 31: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS
                        DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)2018
2017
Commercial Mortgages:  
Office$811.2
$825.2
Apartment/Multi-family490.7
623.3
Retail529.7
631.1
Industrial / Warehouse254.9
311.1
Other426.6
445.6
Total Commercial Mortgages2,513.1
2,836.3
Construction, Acquisition and Development Loans420.6
350.8
Single Family Investment127.0
164.8
Other Commercial Real Estate Related168.1
130.8
Total Commercial Real Estate Loans$3,228.8
$3,482.7

At December 31, 2018, legally binding commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit to commercial real estate borrowers totaled $331.4 million and $8.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2017, legally binding commitments and standby letters of credit totaled $312.5 million and $13.8 million, respectively.

NonperformingNonaccrual Assets and 90 Days Past Due Loans
During 2017,2020, the Corporation implemented a changechanges in the classification of certain loans and leases to enhance the consistency of its reporting across various regulatory regimes. As a result, the loan and lease balances for periods ended prior to January 1, 2017as of December 31, 2019 below have been adjusted to conform to the presentation for periods ended after such date.revised presentation. The 2020 adjustments generally reflectedreflect reclassification of loans and leases from the commercial and institutionalreal estate class to thecommercial and institutional, residential real estate, class. There was no impact on total loans and leases previously reported.private client classes.

60   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


NonperformingNonaccrual assets consist of nonperformingnonaccrual loans and leases and other real estate owned (OREO). OREO is comprised of commercial and residential properties acquired in partial or total satisfaction of loans. Loans that are delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing interest can fluctuate widely at any reporting period based on the timing of cash collections, renegotiations and renewals. For additional information relating to nonaccrual loans, refer to Note 6, “Loans and Leases,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 55

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents nonperformingnonaccrual assets and loans that were delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31, 20182020 and each of the prior four year-ends.2019.


TABLE 32: NONPERFORMING38: NONACCRUAL ASSETS
                  DECEMBER 31,DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
($ In Millions)20202019
Nonperforming Loans and Leases 
Nonaccrual Loans and LeasesNonaccrual Loans and Leases
Commercial Commercial
Commercial and Institutional$6.8
$26.0
$9.2
$18.1
$15.0
Commercial and Institutional$26.4 $7.6 
Commercial Real Estate6.9
8.3
11.6
16.7
37.1
Commercial Real Estate40.2 3.6 
Non-U.S.0.4




Total Commercial14.1
34.3
20.8
34.8
52.1
Total Commercial$66.6 $11.2 
Personal Personal
Residential Real Estate$95.0
$116.4
$139.1
$144.9
$162.4
Residential Real Estate$62.2 $71.4 
Private Client0.2

0.3
0.4
1.2
Private Client2.9 0.5 
Non-U.S.Non-U.S. 0.5 
Total Personal95.2
116.4
139.4
145.3
163.6
Total Personal$65.1 $72.4 
Total Nonperforming Loans and Leases109.3
150.7
160.2
180.1
215.7
Total Nonaccrual Loans and LeasesTotal Nonaccrual Loans and Leases131.7 83.6 
Other Real Estate Owned8.4
4.6
5.2
8.2
16.6
Other Real Estate Owned0.7 3.2 
Total Nonperforming Assets$117.7
$155.3
$165.4
$188.3
$232.3
Total Nonaccrual AssetsTotal Nonaccrual Assets$132.4 $86.8 
90 Day Past Due Loans Still Accruing$16.4
$8.0
$31.0
$7.1
$22.7
90 Day Past Due Loans Still Accruing$8.9 $7.4 
Nonperforming Loans and Leases to Total Loans and Leases0.34%0.46%0.47%0.54%0.68%
Allowance for Credit Losses Assigned to Loans and Leases to Nonperforming Loans and Leases1.0x0.9x1.0x1.1x1.2x
Nonaccrual Loans and Leases to Total Loans and LeasesNonaccrual Loans and Leases to Total Loans and Leases0.39 %0.27 %
Allowance for Credit Losses Assigned to Loans and Leases to Nonaccrual Loans and LeasesAllowance for Credit Losses Assigned to Loans and Leases to Nonaccrual Loans and Leases1.4 x1.3 x

NonperformingNonaccrual assets of $117.7 million as of December 31, 2018 decreased $37.6 million, or 24%2020 increased from $155.3 million in December 31, 2017, reflecting improved credit quality2019, primarily relating to net increases in the commercial real estate portfolio due to three new nonaccrual loans and the commercial and institutional portfolio primarily due to a new nonaccrual loan, partially offset by a net decrease in the residential real estate portfolio due to net payoffs and charge-offs. In addition to the negative impact on net interest income and the commercial and institutional portfolio.risk of credit losses, nonaccrual assets also increase operating costs due to the expense associated with collection efforts. Changes in the level of nonperformingnonaccrual assets may be indicative of changes in the credit quality of one or more loan classes. Changes in credit quality impact the allowance for credit losses through the resultant adjustment of the specific allowance evaluated on an individual basis and the quantitative and qualitative factors used in the determination of the inherent allowance levelsevaluated on a collective basis within the allowance for credit losses.

Allowance and Provision for Credit Losses
During 2017,2020, the Corporation implemented a changechanges in the classification of certain loans and leases to specific segments to enhance the consistency of its reporting across various regulatory regimes. The allowance for credit losses as of and prior to December 31, 20162019 remains unadjusted for these adjustments, as the impact of the reclassification on the allowance was immaterial.

TABLE 33: CHANGES IN THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Balance at January 1$153.8
$192.0
$233.3
Charge-Offs(10.1)(21.5)(27.3)
Recoveries9.0
11.3
12.1
Net Charge-Offs(1.1)(10.2)(15.2)
Provision for Credit Losses(14.5)(28.0)(26.0)
Effects of Foreign Exchange Rates

(0.1)
Balance at December 31$138.2
$153.8
$192.0

The Corporation adopted ASU No. 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, which significantly changed the way impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of financial instruments. For more information on the adoption of ASU 2016-13, please refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The provisionallowance for credit losses is the charge— which represents management’s best estimate of lifetime expected credit losses related to current period earnings thatvarious portfolios subject to credit risk, off-balance sheet credit exposure, and specific borrower relationships — is determined by management through a disciplined credit review process, to beprocess. Northern Trust measures expected credit losses of financial assets with similar risk characteristics on a collective basis. A financial asset is measured individually if it does not share similar risk characteristics with other financial assets and the amount needed to maintain therelated allowance is determined through an individual evaluation. Management’s estimates utilized in establishing an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses atare not dependent on any single assumption. In determining an appropriate allowance level, to absorb probablemanagement evaluates numerous variables, many of which are interrelated or dependent on other assumptions and estimates, and takes into consideration past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The results of the credit reserve estimation methodology are reviewed quarterly by Northern Trust’s Credit Loss Reserve Committee, which receives input from Credit Risk Management, Treasury, Corporate Finance, the Economic Research group, and each of Northern Trust’s business units. The allowance for credit losses that have been identified with specific borrower relationships (specific loss component)related to loans and for probable losses that are believed to be inherent in theleases, undrawn loan and lease portfolios, undrawn commitments and standby letters of credit, (inherent loss component).

debt securities held to maturity, and other financial assets, was $190.7 million, $61.1 million, $7.3 million, and $0.8 million, respectively as of December 31, 2020. For additional information relating to the allowance for credit losses and the changes in the allowance for credit losses during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 due to charge-offs,



201856 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation61

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


recoveries and provisions for credit losses, refer to Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The following table shows the specific portion of the allowancenet recoveries (charge-offs) to average loans and the allocated inherent portion of the allowanceleases by segment and its components by loan categoryclass at December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

TABLE 39: NET RECOVERIES (CHARGE-OFFS) TO AVERAGE LOANS AND LEASES
($ in Millions)202020192018
Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs) to Average Loans and Leases
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional0.02 %(0.03)%0.02 %
Commercial Real Estate(0.18)0.02 (0.02)
Total Commercial(0.03)(0.02)0.01 
Personal
Private Client — (0.01)
Residential Real Estate0.02 0.04 (0.01)
Total Personal 0.02 (0.01)
Total Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs) to Average Loans and Leases(0.01)%— %— %
Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs)
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional$1.8 $(2.6)$1.4 
Commercial Real Estate(5.7)0.5 (0.6)
Total Commercial(3.9)(2.1)0.8 
Personal
Private Client(0.5)0.3 (1.3)
Residential Real Estate1.2 2.5 (0.6)
Total Personal0.7 2.8 (1.9)
Total Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs)$(3.2)$0.7 $(1.1)
Average Loans and Leases
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional$10,347.1 $8,979.9 $9,047.2 
Commercial Real Estate3,253.8 2,918.1 3,072.8 
Total Select Commercial13,600.9 11,898.0 12,120.0 
Personal
Private Client11,452.9 10,746.0 10,413.3 
Residential Real Estate6,116.4 6,297.2 7,034.4 
Total Select Personal17,569.3 17,043.2 17,447.7 
Total Select Average Loans and Leases$31,170.2 $28,941.2 $29,567.7 
Net recoveries (charge-offs) for the following segments were zero and therefore excluded from the above table as the ratio of net recoveries (charge-offs) to average loans and leases is also zero: Lease Financing, net, Other, and Non-U.S. The average loans and leases balances were also not provided in the table for Lease Financing, net, Other, and Non-U.S.
Total average loans and leases for all loan portfolio categories were $33.5 billion, $31.1 billion, and $32.0 billion for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, and at eachrespectively.
The SEC requires the disclosure of the prior four year-ends.Allowance for Credit Losses that is applicable to international operations. The disclosure has been prepared in compliance with this disclosure requirement and is used in determining non-U.S. operating performance. The amounts disclosed should not be construed as being the only amounts that are available for non-U.S. loan charge-offs, since the entire Allowance for Credit Losses assigned to Loans and Leases is available to absorb losses on both U.S. and non-U.S. loans. In addition, these amounts are not intended to be indicative of future charge-off trends. Please refer to the following table for the non-U.S. allowance balances.

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 57

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table shows the allowance evaluated on an individual and collective basis for the loans and leases portfolio by segment and class at December 31, 2020 and 2019.

TABLE 34:40: ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
DECEMBER 31,
20202019
($ In Millions)ALLOWANCE
AMOUNT
PERCENT OF LOANS TO TOTAL LOANSALLOWANCE
AMOUNT
PERCENT OF LOANS TO TOTAL LOANS
Evaluated on an Individual Basis$10.7  %$6.9 — %
Evaluated on a Collective Basis
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional100.6 30 35.3 29 
Commercial Real Estate70.7 10 33.0 10 
Lease Financing, net0.4  0.1 — 
Non-U.S.17.7 4 — 
Other 1 0.2 
Total Commercial189.4 45 68.6 45 
Personal
Residential Real Estate28.9 18 27.0 19 
Private Client20.6 35 20.5 35 
Non-U.S.2.2 2 — 
Other  1.4 — 
Total Personal51.7 55 48.9 55 
Total Allowance Evaluated on a Collective Basis$241.1 100 %$117.5 100 %
Total Allowance for Credit Losses$251.8 100 %$124.4 100 %
Allowance Assigned to:
Loans and Leases$190.7 $104.5 
Undrawn Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit61.1 19.9 
Total Allowance for Credit Losses$251.8 $124.4 
Allowance Assigned to Loans and Leases to Total Loans and Leases0.56 %0.33 %
 DECEMBER 31,
 20182017201620152014
($ In Millions)
ALLOWANCE
AMOUNT

PERCENT
OF
LOANS
TO
TOTAL
LOANS

ALLOWANCE
AMOUNT

PERCENT
OF
LOANS
TO
TOTAL
LOANS

ALLOWANCE
AMOUNT

PERCENT
OF
LOANS
TO
TOTAL
LOANS

ALLOWANCE
AMOUNT

PERCENT
OF
LOANS
TO
TOTAL
LOANS

ALLOWANCE
AMOUNT

PERCENT
OF
LOANS
TO
TOTAL
LOANS

Specific Allowance$10.0
%$5.4
%$2.1
%$3.1
%$21.1
%
Allocated Inherent Allowance          
Commercial          
Commercial and Institutional33.5
27
34.7
27
34.7
27
40.4
28
73.0
26
Commercial Real Estate35.5
10
43.3
11
69.2
12
69.5
12
69.4
10
Lease Financing, net0.1

0.2
1
0.4
1
1.9
2
3.6
3
Non-U.S.
8

5

5

3
3.3
5
Other2.7
2
1.5
1
0.6
1

1

1
Total Commercial71.8
47
79.7
45
104.9
46
111.8
46
149.3
45
Personal          
Residential Real Estate45.8
20
57.3
22
69.0
24
96.2
27
107.7
31
Private Client9.2
33
9.5
33
13.8
30
19.7
27
17.8
24
Other1.4

1.9

2.2

2.5



Total Personal56.4
53
68.7
55
85.0
54
118.4
54
125.5
55
Total Allocated Inherent Allowance$128.2
100%$148.4
100%$189.9
100%$230.2
100%$274.8
100%
Total Allowance for Credit Losses$138.2
100%$153.8
100%$192.0
100%$233.3
100%$295.9
100%
Allowance Assigned to:          
Loans and Leases$112.6
 $131.2
 $161.0
 $193.8
 $267.0
 
Undrawn Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit25.6
 22.6
 31.0
 39.5
 28.9
 
Total Allowance for Credit Losses$138.2
 $153.8
 $192.0
 $233.3
 $295.9
 
Allowance Assigned to Loans and Leases to Total Loans and Leases0.35% 0.40% 0.48% 0.58% 0.84% 


Specific Component of the Allowance:Allowance Related to Credit Exposure Evaluated on an Individual Basis: The amount of specific allowance is determined through an individual evaluation of loans, leases, and lending-related commitments considered impaired that is based on expected future cash flows, the value of collateral, value, and other factors that may impact the borrower’s ability to pay.
AtThe allowance evaluated on an individual basis for Loans and Leases increased $3.8 million from $6.9 million at December 31, 2018, the specific allowance component amounted2019 to $10.0 million compared with $5.4$10.7 million at the end of 2017. The $4.6 million increase isDecember 31, 2020, primarily attributable to outstanding loans in the commercial and standby letters of creditinstitutional portfolio, partially offset by a decrease in outstanding loans in the residential real estate and commercial and institutional portfolios, respectively.portfolio.

Allowance Related to Credit Exposure Evaluated on a Collective Basis: Expected credit losses are measured on a collective basis as long as the financial assets included in the respective pool share similar risk characteristics. If financial assets are deemed to not share similar risk characteristics, an individual assessment is warranted.
The increase in the specific component of the allowance from $2.1 million in 2016 to $5.4 million in 2017 was primarily attributable to additional allowances providedevaluated on a collective basis for new nonperforming loans, partially offset by charge-offsLoans and pay-offs.

Inherent Component of the Allowance: The inherent component of the allowance addresses exposure relating to probable but unidentified credit-related losses. The inherent component of the allowance also covers the credit exposure associated with undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit. To estimate the allowance for credit losses on

62   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


these instruments, management uses conversion rates to determine the estimated amount that will be drawn and assigns an allowance factor determined in accordance with the methodology utilized for outstanding loans.
The inherent portion of the allowance decreased $20.2Leases increased $123.6 million to $128.2$241.1 million at December 31, 2018,2020, compared with $148.4$117.5 million at December 31, 2017, which decreased $41.5 million from $189.9 million at December 31, 2016.
The decrease in 2018 was2019 under the previous “incurred loss” model, primarily driven by reductions in outstanding loanscurrent and undrawn loan commitmentsprojected economic conditions and standby letters of credit and improved credit quality across the portfolio. The decrease in 2017 was primarily driven by improvementdowngrades in the credit quality ofportfolio, both resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts. The largest increases were in the commercial and institutional and commercial real estate and residential real estate portfolios.


Overall Allowance: The evaluation of the specific componentreserve evaluated on an individual and the inherent component abovecollective basis resulted in a total allowance for credit losses of $138.2$259.9 million at December 31, 2018,2020, compared with $153.8$124.4 million at the end of 2017.2019 under the previous “incurred loss” model. The allowance of $112.6$190.7 million assigned to loansLoans and leases,Leases, as a percentage of total loansLoans and leases,Leases, was 0.35%0.56% at December 31, 2018, down2020, which increased from a $131.2$104.5 million allowance assigned to loansLoans and leases,Leases, representing 0.40%0.33% of total loansLoans and leasesLeases at December 31, 2017.2019. Allowances assigned to undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit totaled $25.6$61.1 million and $22.6$19.9 million at December 31, 20182020 and December 31, 2017,2019, respectively, and are included in other liabilities inOther Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.


Provision:



58 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures in 2020 included continued investments to enhance Northern Trust’s software and hardware capabilities, the opening of new offices, and the renovation of several existing offices. Capital expenditures for 2020 totaled $560.4 million, of which $424.6 million was for software, $66.6 million was for building and leasehold improvements, $65.4 million was for computer hardware, and $3.8 million was for furnishings. These capital expenditures principally support, enhance, and protect Northern Trust’s investment management, asset servicing and asset management systems and capabilities, and deliver innovative solutions to better serve our clients. Additional capital expenditures committed for technology systems will result in future expense for the depreciation of hardware and amortization of software. Software amortization and depreciation on computer hardware and machinery are charged to Equipment and Software expense. Depreciation on building and leasehold improvements and on furnishings is charged to Occupancy expense and equipment expense, respectively. Capital expenditures for 2019 totaled $599.8 million, of which $441.8 million was for software, $77.7 million was for building and leasehold improvements, $73.7 million was for computer hardware, and $6.6 million was for furnishings.
Deposits
The following table provides the scheduled maturity of total time deposits in denominations of $250,000 or greater at December 31, 2020. For additional information, refer to Note 12, “Deposits,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

TABLE 41: REMAINING MATURITY OF TIME DEPOSITS $250,000 OR MORE
DECEMBER 31, 2020
U.S. OFFICENON-U.S. OFFICES
(In Millions)CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSITOTHER TIMETOTAL
3 Months or Less$266.1 $205.4 $471.5 
Over 3 Months through 6 Months83.6  83.6 
Over 6 Months through 12 Months310.5  310.5 
Over 12 Months41.2  41.2 
Total$701.4 $205.4 $906.8 

Deposits not insured by the FDIC as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled $135.5 billion and $100.9 billion, respectively. These deposit amounts are derived by adding estimated domestic office uninsured deposits as allowed by Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council instructions to all foreign office deposits. Estimated uninsured domestic office deposits are determined by calculating and totaling the deposits in excess of the deposit insurance limit on an individual account basis.
Short-Term Borrowings
For additional information relating to short-term borrowings, refer to Note 5, “Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Geographic Area Information
Northern Trust’s non-U.S. activities are primarily related to its asset servicing, asset management, foreign exchange, cash management, and commercial banking businesses. The operations of Northern Trust are managed on a reporting segment basis and include components of both U.S and non-U.S. source assets. Non-U.S. source assets are not separately identified in Northern Trust’s internal management reporting system. However, Northern Trust is required to disclose non-U.S. activities based on the domicile of the customer. Due to the complex and integrated nature of Northern Trust’s activities, it is difficult to segregate with precision assets between U.S. and non-U.S.-domiciled customers. Therefore, certain subjective estimates and assumptions have been made to allocate assets between U.S. and non-U.S. operations.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 59

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables present selected average assets and liabilities attributable to non-U.S. operations (based on the obligor’s domicile) and the percent of those balances to total consolidated average assets. For additional information refer to Note 32, “Reporting Segments and Related Information,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

TABLE 42: SELECTED AVERAGE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE TO NON-U.S. OPERATIONS
($ In Millions)20202019
Total Assets$26,908.5 $27,240.7 
Time Deposits with Banks3,258.5 3,896.5 
Loans1,742.5 1,721.1 
Non-U.S. Investments16,018.5 15,420.6 
Total Liabilities70,001.5 62,110.3 
Deposits68,828.9 60,419.7 

Non-U.S. Outstandings
As used in this discussion, non-U.S. outstandings are cross-border outstandings as defined by the SEC. They consist of loans, securities, interest-bearing deposits with financial institutions, accrued interest and other monetary assets. Not included are letters of credit, loan commitments, and non-U.S. office local currency claims on residents. Non-U.S. outstandings related to a country are net of guarantees given by third parties resident outside the country and the value of tangible, liquid collateral realizable outside the country. However, transactions with branches of non-U.S. banks are included in these outstandings and are classified according to the country location of the non-U.S. bank’s head office.
Short-term interbank time deposits with non-U.S. banks represent the largest category of non-U.S. outstandings. Northern Trust actively participates in the interbank market with U.S. and non-U.S. banks.
Northern Trust places deposits with non-U.S. counterparties that have strong internal (Northern Trust) risk ratings and external credit ratings. These non-U.S. banks are approved and monitored by Northern Trust’s Capital Markets Credit Committee, which has credit authority for exposure to all non-U.S. banks and approves credit limits. This process includes financial analysis of the non-U.S. banks, use of an internal risk rating system and consideration of external market indicators. Each counterparty is reviewed at least annually and potentially more frequently based on credit fundamentals or general market conditions. Separate from the entity-specific review process, the average life to maturity of deposits with non-U.S. banks is deliberately maintained on a short-term basis in order to respond quickly to changing credit conditions. Northern Trust also utilizes certain risk mitigation tools and agreements that may reduce exposures through use of collateral and/or balance sheet netting. Additionally, the Capital Markets Credit Committee oversees country-risk analyses and imposes limits on country exposure. For additional information refer to Note 32, “Reporting Segments and Related Information,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
The following discusses the statement of cash flow activities for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.
TABLE 43: CASH FLOW ACTIVITY SUMMARY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities$1,896.8 $2,592.0 $1,767.5 
Investing activities(29,923.0)(3,405.0)4,327.1 
Financing activities27,871.9 615.9 (5,818.2)
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Rates on Cash84.6 74.7 (212.9)
Change in Cash and Due from Banks$(69.7)$(122.4)$63.5 

Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities of $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to period earnings and the impact of higher non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization and provision for credit losseslosses.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash provided by operating activities of $2.6 billion was a creditprimarily reflecting period earnings and lower net collateral deposited with derivative counterparties.



60 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities of $14.5 million$29.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to higher levels of deposits with the Federal Reserve and other central banks, net purchases of debt securities held to maturity, higher levels of loans and leases, and net charge-offs totaled $1.1purchases of debt securities available for sale.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in investing activities of $3.4 billion was primarily reflecting higher levels of deposits with the Federal Reserve and other central banks, net purchases of debt securities available for sale, and the purchase of bank-owned life insurance policies, partially offset by the net proceeds from the maturity and redemption of debt securities held to maturity and lower levels of loans and leases.

Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities of $27.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to higher levels of total deposits and proceeds from the issuance by the Corporation of 1.95% senior notes, partially offset by lower short-term other borrowings, dividends paid on common stock, repayment of the 3.45% senior notes previously issued by the Corporation that matured in November 2020, lower securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and the redemption of the Series C Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock. The increase in total deposits was primarily attributable to higher levels of non-U.S. office noninterest-bearing deposits, non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits, savings, money market and other interest-bearing deposits, and demand and other noninterest-bearing deposits.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash provided by financing activities of $0.6 billion was primarily reflecting higher levels of total deposits, proceeds from the issuance by the Corporation of 3.15% senior notes, and proceeds from the Series E Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock issuance, partially offset by lower federal funds purchased, lower short-term other borrowings, and the repurchase of common stock pursuant to the Corporation’s share repurchase program. The increase in total deposits was primarily attributable to higher levels of savings, money market and other interest-bearing deposits and non-U.S. office noninterest-bearing deposits, partially offset by lower levels of non-U.S. office interest-bearing deposits.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
One of Northern Trust’s primary objectives is to maintain a strong capital position to merit the confidence of clients, counterparties, creditors, regulators and stockholders. A strong capital position helps Northern Trust execute its strategies and withstand unforeseen adverse developments.
Senior management, with oversight from the Capital Governance Committee and the full Board of Directors, is responsible for capital management and planning. Northern Trust manages its capital on both a total Corporation basis and a legal entity basis. The Capital Committee is responsible for measuring and managing capital metrics against levels set forth within the Capital Policy approved by the Capital Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. In establishing the metrics related to capital, a variety of factors are taken into consideration, including the unique risk profiles of Northern Trust’s businesses, regulatory requirements, capital levels relative to peers, and the impact on credit ratings.
Capital levels strengthened in 2020 as average stockholders’ equity increased $544.2 million, or 5%, reaching $11.2 billion. Total stockholders’ equity was $11.7 billion at December 31, 2020, as compared to $11.1 billion at December 31, 2019. During 2019, the Corporation issued and sold 16 million depositary shares, each representing 1/1,000th ownership interest in a share of Series E Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock for proceeds of $391.4 million, net of underwriting discounts, commissions, and other issuance costs. These proceeds were subsequently used to fund the redemption of all outstanding shares of the Corporation’s Series C Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock on January 2, 2020 at a redemption price of $400.0 million, which was $11.5 million in 2018. This comparesexcess of the net carrying value of the shares. The $11.5 million excess is included in preferred stock dividends in the determination of net income available to common shareholders. Preferred dividends totaling $44.7 million were declared in 2020. During 2020, the Corporation maintained its quarterly common stock dividend of $0.70 per common share. Common dividends totaling $592.0 million were declared in 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Corporation repurchased 3.3 million shares of common stock, including 0.5 million shares withheld related to share-based compensation, at an average price per share of $91.49.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 61

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In accordance with Basel III requirements, capital ratios are calculated using both the standardized and advanced approaches. For each ratio, the lower of the result calculated under the standardized approach and the advanced approach serves as the effective ratio for purposes of determining capital adequacy. The following table provides a credit provisionreconciliation of $28.0 millionthe Corporation’s common stockholders’ equity to total risk-based capital and its risk-based capital ratios, under the applicable U.S. regulatory rules as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

TABLE 44: CAPITAL ADEQUACY
($ In Millions)DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
STANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED APPROACHSTANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED APPROACH
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
Common Stockholders’ Equity$10,803.4 $10,803.4 $9,817.5 $9,817.5 
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net of Deferred Tax Liability(775.7)(775.7)(776.1)(776.1)
Other(65.5)(65.5)(142.7)(142.7)
Total Common Equity Tier 1 Capital9,962.2 9,962.2 8,898.7 8,898.7 
Additional Tier 1 Capital
Preferred Stock884.9 884.9 1,273.4 1,273.4 
Other(24.9)(24.9)(20.1)(20.1)
Total Additional Tier 1 Capital860.0 860.0 1,253.3 1,253.3 
Total Tier 1 Capital10,822.2 10,822.2 10,152.0 10,152.0 
Tier 2 Capital
Qualifying Allowance for Credit Losses259.9  124.4 — 
Qualifying Subordinated Debt949.7 949.7 1,099.5 1,099.5 
Floating Rate Capital53.9 53.9 80.8 80.8 
Total Tier 2 Capital1,263.5 1,003.6 1,304.7 1,180.3 
Total Risk-Based Capital$12,085.7 $11,825.8 $11,456.7 $11,332.3 
Risk-Weighted Assets(1)
$77,662.5 $74,460.4 $70,088.3 $67,526.9 
Total Assets – End of Period (EOP)170,003.9 170,003.9 136,828.4 136,828.4 
Adjusted Average Fourth Quarter Assets(2)
142,457.6 142,457.6 117,165.7 117,165.7 
Total Loans and Leases – EOP33,759.7 33,759.7 31,409.6 31,409.6 
Common Stockholders’ Equity to:
Total Loans and Leases – EOP32.00 %32.00 %31.26 %31.26 %
Total Assets – EOP6.35 6.35 7.18 7.18 
Risk-Based Capital Ratios
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital12.8 %13.4 %12.7 %13.2 %
Tier 1 Capital13.9 14.5 14.5 15.0 
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)15.6 15.9 16.3 16.8 
Tier 1 Leverage7.6 7.6 8.7 8.7 
Supplementary Leverage(3)
N/A8.6 N/A7.6 
(1) Risk-weighted assets exclude, as applicable under each regulatory approach, amounts primarily related to goodwill, certain other intangible assets, and net charge-offs of $10.2 million in 2017,unrealized gains or losses on securities and a $26.0 millionreflect adjustments for excess allowances for credit provisionlosses that have been excluded from Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital, if any.
(2) Adjusted average fourth quarter assets exclude amounts primarily related to goodwill, other intangible assets, and net charge-offsunrealized gains or losses on securities.
(3) In November 2019, the Federal Reserve and other U.S. federal banking agencies adopted a final rule that established a deduction for central bank deposits from the total leverage exposures of $15.2 million in 2016.

Impaired Loans
A loan is impaired when, based on current informationcustodial banking organizations, including Northern Trust Corporation and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due accordingThe Northern Trust Company, equal to the contractual termslesser of (i) the loan agreementtotal amount of funds the custodial banking organization and its consolidated subsidiaries have on deposit at qualifying central banks and (ii) the total amount of client funds on deposit at the custodial banking organization that are linked to fiduciary or when its terms have been modified ascustodial and safekeeping accounts. The rule became effective on April 1, 2020.
Further, on April 1, 2020, the Federal Reserve issued an interim final rule that requires bank holding companies, including Northern Trust Corporation, to deduct, on a concession resultingtemporary basis, deposits with the Federal Reserve and investments in U.S. Treasury securities from their total leverage exposure. The U.S. Treasury securities deduction is applied in addition to the debtor’s financial difficulties,central bank deposits relief referred to as a troubled debt restructuring. above. This rule became effective on April 1, 2020 and will remain in effect through the first quarter of 2021. On May 15, 2020, the U.S. federal banking agencies released an interim final rule that permits insured depository institutions of bank holding companies also to temporarily exclude deposits with the Federal Reserve and investments in U.S. Treasury securities from their total leverage exposure. The Northern Trust Company did not elect to take this deduction.
The supplementary leverage ratios at December 31, 2020 for the Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust Company reflect the impact of these final rules.




62 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As of December 31, 2018, impaired loans totaled $116.2 million2020 and included $99.8 million of loans deemed troubled debt restructurings2019, the Corporation’s capital ratios exceeded the requirements for classification as compared to total impaired loans of $139.8 million at December 31, 2017, which included $98.4 million of loans deemed troubled debt restructurings. Impaired loans had $7.2 million and $5.4 million“well-capitalized” under applicable U.S. regulatory requirements. As a result of the allowance for credit losses allocated to them at December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively. Impaired loans are measured based uponstress test results published by the loan’s market price, the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the loan valuation is less than the recorded value of the loan, dependent upon the level of certainty of loss, either a specific allowance is established or a charge-off is recordedFederal Reserve on June 25, 2020, Northern Trust’s stress capital buffer requirement for the difference. Smaller balance (individually less than $1 million2020 Capital Plan cycle was set at 2.5%. The 2020 stress capital buffer became effective October 1, 2020, and results in a common equity tier 1 capital ratio minimum requirement of 7.0%.
Further information regarding the Corporation’s and the Bank’s capital ratios and the minimum requirements for classification as “well-capitalized” is provided in the “Supervision and Regulation” section of Item 1, “Business,” and Note 33, “Regulatory Capital Requirements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
As of December 31, 2018) homogeneous loans2020, the Basel III regulatory capital items subject to phase-in and phase-out are collectively evaluated for impairmentnot material to regulatory capital ratios.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Commitments, Letters of Credit, and excluded from impaired loan disclosuresSecurities Lent with Indemnification
Northern Trust, in the normal course of business, enters into various types of commitments and issues letters of credit to meet the liquidity and credit enhancement needs of its clients. The contractual amounts of these instruments represent the potential credit exposure should the instrument be drawn fully upon and the client default. To control the credit risk associated with entering into commitments and issuing letters of credit, Northern Trust subjects such activities to the same credit quality and monitoring controls as allowed under applicable accounting standards.its lending activities.
At December 31, 2020, legally binding commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit to commercial real estate borrowers totaled $252.3 million and $4.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2019, legally binding commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit to commercial real estate borrowers totaled $301.6 million and $9.2 million, respectively.
Additional information about Northern Trust’s off-balance sheet financial instruments is included in Note 26, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Variable Interest Entities
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) are defined within GAAP as entities which either (1) lack sufficient equity at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) have equity investors that lack attributes typical of an equity investor, such as the ability to make significant decisions through voting rights affecting the entity’s operations, or the obligation to absorb expected losses or the right to receive residual returns of the entity, or (3) are structured with voting rights that are disproportionate to the equity investor’s obligation to absorb losses or right to receive returns, and substantially all of the activities are conducted on behalf of the holder of the equity investment at risk with disproportionately few voting rights. Investors that finance a VIE through debt or equity interests are variable interest holders in the entity and the variable interest holder, if any, that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and, through its variable interest, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns that could potentially be significant to the entity is deemed to be the VIE’s primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate the VIE.
Additional information about Northern Trust’s VIEs is included in Note 29, “Variable Interest Entities,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The use of estimates and assumptions is required in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and actual results could differ from those estimates. The SEC has issued guidance relating to the disclosure of critical accounting estimates. Critical accounting estimates are those that require management to make subjective or complex judgments about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Changes that may be required in the underlying assumptions or estimates in these areas could have a material impact on Northern Trust’s future financial condition and results of operations.
For Northern Trust, accounting estimates that are viewed as critical are those relating to the allowance for credit losses and pension plan accounting. Management has discussed the development and selection of each critical accounting estimate with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (Audit Committee).


2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 63

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Corporation adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13) on January 1, 2020, which significantly changes the way impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of financial instruments. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, the Corporation recorded a $13.7 million increase in the allowance for credit losses with a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment to decrease retained earnings $10.1 million, net of income taxes. For more information on the adoption of ASU 2016-13, please refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The allowance for credit losses — which represents management’s estimate of probablelifetime expected credit losses which have been incurred asrelated to various portfolios subject to credit risk, off-balance sheet credit exposure, and specific borrower relationships — is determined by management through a disciplined credit review process. Northern Trust measures expected credit losses of financial assets with similar risk characteristics on a collective basis. A financial asset is measured individually if it does not share similar risk characteristics with other financial assets and the date of the consolidated financial statements. The loan and lease portfolio and other lending-related credit exposures are regularly reviewed to evaluate therelated allowance is determined through an individual evaluation.
Management’s estimates utilized in establishing an appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses.losses are not dependent on any single assumption. In determining an appropriate allowance level, Northern Trustmanagement evaluates numerous variables, many of which are interrelated or dependent on other assumptions and estimates, and takes into consideration past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Due to the allowance necessary for impaired loansinherent imprecision in accounting estimates, other estimates or assumptions could reasonably have been used in 2020 and lending-related commitments and alsochanges in estimates losses inherent in other lending-related credit exposures.are reasonably likely to occur from period to period.

The allowance for credit losses consists of the following components:



Evaluated on a Collective Basis: Expected credit losses are measured on a collective basis as long as the financial assets included in the respective pool share similar risk characteristics. If financial assets are deemed to not share similar risk characteristics, an individual assessment is warranted.
The allowance estimation methodology for the collective assessment is primarily based on internal loss data specific to the Northern Trust financial asset portfolio from a historical observation period that includes both expansionary and recessionary periods. The estimation methodology and the related qualitative adjustment framework segregate the loan and lease portfolio into segments based on loan and obligor-specific factors, including loan type, borrower type, collateral type, loan size, and borrower credit quality. For each segment, the probability of default and loss given default are derived for each quarter of the remaining life of each instrument. For the first two years (the reasonable and supportable period), these factors are derived by applying quarterly macroeconomic projections using models developed from historical data on macroeconomic factors and loans with similar factors. For periods beyond the reasonable and supportable period, Northern Trust reverts to its long-run historical loss experiences on a straight-line basis over four quarters. The exposure at default for every quarter is based on contractual balances as of each quarter-end, with adjustments made for potential draw-downs of revolving lines.
For each of the different parameters, specific credit models for the individual loan segments were developed. For each segment, the probability of defaultand the loss given default are applied to the exposure at default for each projected quarter to determine the quantitative component of the allowance. The quantitative allowance is then reviewed within the qualitative adjustment framework, through which management applies judgment by assessing internal risk factors, potential limitations in the quantitative methodology, and environmental factors that are not fully contemplated in the forecast to compute an adjustment to the quantitative allowance for each segment of the loan portfolio.
ASU 2016-13 requires the use of projected macroeconomic factors. Northern Trust’s current projection period is eight quarters, with a four-quarter straight-line reversion period to historical average loss rates. The Corporation uses multiple forecasts which are approved by Northern Trust’s Macroeconomic Scenario Development Committee (MSDC). The baseline forecast aligns with the Corporation’s latest thinking on macroeconomic projections for the next eight quarters. The forecasts are weighted at each evaluation period and are management’s best estimate of future economic projections at that time.
The allowance estimate is sensitive to changes in portfolio composition and quality, and macroeconomic forecasts. Increases in the amount of borrowing and material downgrades to the quality of the lending portfolio will increase the reserve, all else equal. Similarly, deteriorating projections for macroeconomic conditions will increase the reserve. Macroeconomic factors that are particularly correlated to Northern Trust’s loan and lease portfolio are equity market values, market volatility, corporate profits, house and commercial real estate price indices, unemployment, and disposable income. The investment security and other financial assets exposure portfolios are less sensitive to macroeconomic factors in terms of overall reserve impact due to factors such as high credit quality, short duration, and low historical losses.



201864 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation63

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The results of the credit reserve estimation methodology are reviewed quarterly by Northern Trust’s Credit Loss Reserve Committee, which receives input from Credit Risk Management, Treasury, Corporate Finance, the Economic Research group, and each of Northern Trust’s business units. The Credit Loss Reserve Committee determines the probability weights applied to each forecast approved by MSDC, and also reviews and approves qualitative adjustments to the collective allowance in line with Northern Trust’s qualitative adjustment framework.
Specific Allowance:
Evaluated on an Individual Basis: The specific allowance is determined through an individual evaluation of loans and lending-related commitmentsfinancial assets considered impaired that is based on expected future cash flows, the value of collateral, value, and other factors that may impact the borrower’s ability to pay. For impaired loans wherefor which the amount of specific allowance, if any, is determined based on the value of the underlying real estate collateral, third-party appraisals are typically obtained and utilized by management. These appraisals are generally less than twelve months old and are subject to adjustments to reflect management’s judgment as to the realizable value of the collateral.

Inherent Allowance: The inherent allowance estimation methodology is based on internally developed loss data specific to the Northern Trust loan and lease portfolio. The estimation methodology and the related qualitative adjustment framework segregate the loan and lease portfolio into segments. For each segment, the probability of default and the loss given default are applied to the total exposure at default to determine a quantitative inherent allowance. The estimated allowance is reviewed by the Loan Loss Reserve Committee within a qualitative adjustment framework to determine an appropriate adjustment to the quantitative inherent allowance for each segment of the loan portfolio. In determining the appropriate adjustment, management applies judgment by assessing internal risk factors, potential limitations in the quantitative methodology and environmental factors that are not contemplated in the quantitative methodology. The Loan Loss Reserve Committee is comprised of representatives from Credit Risk Management, the reporting segments and Corporate Finance.
The quarterly analysis of the specificindividual and inherentcollective allowance components and the control process maintained by Credit Risk Management and the lending staff are the principal methods relied upon by management for the timely identification of, and adjustment for, changes in estimated credit loss levels. In addition to Northern Trust’s own experience, management also considers regulatory guidance. Control processes and analyses employed to determine an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses are reviewed on at least an annual basis and modified as considered appropriate.
Loans, leases and other extensions of credit deemed uncollectible are charged to the allowance for credit losses. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Determinations as to whether loan balances for which the collectability is in question are charged-off or a specific reserve is established based on management’s assessment as to the level of certainty regarding the amount of loss. The provision for credit losses, which is charged to income, is the amount necessary to adjustManagement believes that the allowance for credit losses to the level deemed to beadequately addresses these uncertainties and has been established at an appropriate through the above process.level. Actual losses may vary from current estimates and the amount of the provision for credit losses may be either greater than or less than actual net charge-offs.
Management’s estimates utilized in establishing an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses are not dependent on any single assumption. Management evaluates numerous variables, many of which are interrelated or dependent on other assumptions and estimates, in determining an appropriate allowance level. Due to the inherent imprecision in accounting estimates, other estimates or assumptions could reasonably have been used in 2018 and changes in estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period.
Additionally, as an integral part of their examination process, various federal and state regulatory agencies also review the allowance for credit losses. These agencies may require that certain loan balances be classified differently or charged off when their credit evaluations differ from those of management, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. However, management believes that the allowance for credit losses adequately addresses these uncertainties and has been established at an appropriate level to cover probable losses which have occurred as of the date of the consolidated financial statements.


Pension Plan Accounting
Northern Trust maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all U.S. employees (the(U.S. Qualified Plan) and a U.S. noncontributory supplemental pension plan (the Nonqualified(U.S. Non-qualified Plan). Certain European-based employees also retain benefits in local defined benefit pension plans, of which the majority are closed to new employees and to future benefit accruals. Measuring cost and reporting liabilities resulting from defined benefit pension plans requires the use of several assumptions regarding future interest rates, asset returns, compensation increases, mortality rates, and other actuarially-based projections relating to the plans. Due to the long-term nature of this obligation and the estimates that are required to be made, the assumptions used in determining the periodic pension expense and the projected pension obligation are closely monitored and reviewed annually for adjustments that may be required. Pension accounting guidance requires that differences between estimates and actual experience be recognized as other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. The differences are amortized into net periodic pension expense from accumulated other comprehensive income over the future working lifetimeaverage remaining service period of eligible participants. As a result, differences between the estimates made in the calculation of periodic pension expense and the projected pension obligation and actual experience affect stockholders’ equity in the period in which they occur but continue to be recognized as expense systematically and gradually over subsequent periods.

64   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Northern Trust recognizes the significant impact that these pension-related assumptions have on the determination of the pension obligations and related expense and has established procedures for monitoring and setting these assumptions each year. These procedures include an annual review of actual demographic and investment experience with the pension plans’ actuaries. In addition to actual experience, adjustments to these assumptions consider observable yields on fixed income securities, known compensation trends and policies, as well as economic conditions and investment strategies that may impact the estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets.
In determining the pension expense for the U.S. pension plans in 2018,2020, Northern Trust utilized a discount rate of 3.79%3.37% for both the U.S. Qualified Plan and the NonqualifiedU.S. Non-qualified Plan. The rate of increase in the compensation level is based on a graded schedule from 9.00% to 2.50% that averaged 4.39%4.97%. The expected long-term rate of return on U.S. Qualified Plan assets was 6.00%5.25%.
In evaluating possible revisions to pension-related assumptions for the U.S. pension plans as of Northern Trust’s December 31, 20182020 measurement date, the following were considered:
Discount Rate: Northern Trust estimates the discount rate for its U.S. pension plans by applying the plan specific projected cash flows for future benefit payments for each plan to the Aon AA Above Median yield curve as of the measurement date. This yield curve is composed of individual zero-coupon interest rates for 198 different time periods over a 99-year time horizon. Zero-coupon rates utilized by the yield curve are mathematically derived from observable market yields for AA-rated corporate bonds. This yield curve model referenced by Northern Trust in establishing the discount rate resulted in a rate of 4.47%2.75% and 2.45% at December 31, 20182020 for the U.S. Qualified and Nonqualified plans, an increase from 3.79% at December 31, 2017.U.S. Non-qualified Plans, respectively.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 65

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Compensation Level: Based on a review of actual and anticipated salary experience, the compensation scale assumption continues to beis based on a graded schedule from 9.00% to 2.50% that averages 4.39%4.97%.
Rate of Return on Plan Assets: The expected return on plan assets is based on an estimate of the long-term (30 years) rate of return on plan assets, which is determined using a building block approach that considers the current asset mix and estimates of return by asset class based on historical experience, giving proper consideration to diversification and rebalancing. Current market factors such as inflation and interest rates are also evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed to check for reasonability and appropriateness. As a result of these analyses, Northern Trust’s rate of return assumption for the U.S. Qualified Plan remains at 6.00%5.25% for 2019.
2021.
Mortality Table: As of December 31, 2020, Northern Trust useshas adopted the aggregate RP-2014Pri-2012 mortality table with adjustment from 2014 to 2006.a 2012 base year, which was released by the Society of Actuaries in October 2019. Northern Trust’s pension obligations reflect proposed future improvement under scale MP-2018,MP-2020, which was released by the Society of Actuaries in October 2018.2020. This assumption was updated at December 31, 20182020 from improvement scale MP-2017.MP-2019. The updated improvement scale applies to annuity payments only and results in generallyslightly lower projected mortality improvementsimprovement rates than estimated by the MP-2017MP-2019 improvement scale. Mortality assumptions on lump sum payments remain static and continue to be in line with the IRS prescribed table for minimum lump sums in 2019.
2021.


Annual netNet pension expense in 20192021 is expected to decreaseincrease slightly by approximately $8.2$1.2 million, primarily driven by the increasedecrease in discount rate.rates in 2020.


In order to illustrate the sensitivity of these assumptions on the expected U.S Plans’pension plans’ periodic pension expense in 20192021 and the projected benefit obligation as of December 31, 2018,2020, the following table is presented to show the effect of increasing or decreasing each of these assumptions by 25 basis points.


TABLE 35:45: SENSITIVITY OF U.S. PENSION PLANS ASSUMPTIONS
($ In Millions)25 BASIS
POINT INCREASE
25 BASIS
POINT DECREASE
Increase (Decrease) in 2021 Pension Expense
Discount Rate Change$(4.4)$4.6 
Compensation Level Change2.5 (2.5)
Rate of Return on Plan Assets Change(3.8)3.8 
Increase (Decrease) in 2020 Projected Benefit Obligation
Discount Rate Change(58.0)61.4 
Compensation Level Change10.8 (10.4)
($ In Millions)
25 BASIS
POINT INCREASE

25 BASIS
POINT DECREASE

Increase (Decrease) in 2019 Pension Expense  
Discount Rate Change$(3.8)$3.9
Compensation Level Change1.8
(1.6)
Rate of Return on Plan Assets Change(3.6)3.6
Increase (Decrease) in 2018 Projected Benefit Obligation  
Discount Rate Change(42.0)44.3
Compensation Level Change6.7
(6.5)


Pension Contributions: The deduction limits specified by the Internal Revenue Code for contributions made by sponsors of defined benefit pension plans are based on a “Target Liability” under the provisions of the Pension Protection Act of

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 65

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


2006. There were no contributions to the U.S. Qualified Plan in 2018 plan year. Northern Trust contributed $50.0 million to the Qualified Plan at the beginning of 2018, retrospectively for the 20172020 plan year. The minimum required contribution to the U.S. Qualified Plan is expected to be zero in 2019.2021. The maximum deductible contribution is estimated at $270$255.0 million for 2019.2021.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTSVariable Interest Entities
The preparationVariable Interest Entities (VIEs) are defined within GAAP as entities which either (1) lack sufficient equity at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) have equity investors that lack attributes typical of financial statementsan equity investor, such as the ability to make significant decisions through voting rights affecting the entity’s operations, or the obligation to absorb expected losses or the right to receive residual returns of the entity, or (3) are structured with voting rights that are disproportionate to the equity investor’s obligation to absorb losses or right to receive returns, and substantially all of the activities are conducted on behalf of the holder of the equity investment at risk with disproportionately few voting rights. Investors that finance a VIE through debt or equity interests are variable interest holders in conformity with GAAP requires certain assetsthe entity and liabilitiesthe variable interest holder, if any, that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and, through its variable interest, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns that could potentially be significant to the entity is deemed to be reported at fair value. As of December 31, 2018, approximately 29% ofthe VIE’s primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate the VIE.
Additional information about Northern Trust’s total assets and less than 1% of its total liabilities were carried on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. As discussed more fullyVIEs is included in Note 3, “Fair Value Measurements,29, “Variable Interest Entities, to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” GAAP requires entities to categorize financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value according to a three-level valuation hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted, active market prices for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to valuation techniques that require significant management judgment because one or more of the significant inputs are unobservable in the market place (Level 3). Approximately 14% of Northern Trust’s assets carried at fair value are classified as Level 1. Northern Trust typically does not hold equity securities or other instruments that are actively traded on an exchange.
Approximately 86% of Northern Trust’s assets and 94% of its liabilities carried at fair value are categorized as Level 2, as they are valued using models in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets. Investment debt securities classified as available for sale make up 96% of Level 2 assets with the remaining 4% primarily consisting of derivative financial instruments. Level 2 liabilities are comprised solely of derivative financial instruments.
Northern Trust’s Level 2 assets include available for sale and trading account securities, the fair values of which are determined predominantly by external pricing vendors. Northern Trust has a well-established process to validate prices received from pricing vendors as discussed more fully in Note 3, “Fair Value Measurements,” to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
As
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1, “Summary of December 31, 2018, all derivative assets and liabilities, excluding the swap related to the sale of certain Visa Class B common shares described below, were classified as Level 2 and approximately 96%, measured on a notional value basis, related to client-related and trading activities, predominantly consisting of foreign exchange contracts. Derivative instruments are valued internally using widely accepted income-based models that incorporate inputs readily observable in actively quoted markets and reflect contractual terms of contracts. Northern Trust evaluated the impact of counterparty credit risk and its own credit risk on the valuation of derivative instruments. Factors considered included the likelihood of default by Northern Trust and its counterparties, the remaining maturities of the instruments, net exposures after giving effect to master netting agreements, available collateral, and other credit enhancements in determining the appropriate fair value of derivative instruments. The resulting valuation adjustments are not considered material.
As of December 31, 2018, Northern Trust’s Level 3 liabilities consisted of swaps that Northern Trust entered into with the purchaser of 1.1 million and 1.0 million shares of Visa Class B common shares previously held by Northern Trust and sold in June 2016 and 2015, respectively. Pursuant to the swaps, Northern Trust retains the risks associated with the ultimate conversion of the Visa Class B common shares into shares of Visa Inc. Class A common stock (Visa Class A common shares), such that the counterparty will be compensated for any dilutive adjustments to the conversion ratio and Northern Trust will be compensated for any anti-dilutive adjustments to the ratio. The swaps also require periodic payments from Northern Trust to the counterparty calculated by reference to the market price of Visa Class A common shares and a fixed rate of interest. The fair value of the swaps are determined using a discounted cash flow methodology. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement are Northern Trust’s own assumptions about estimated changes in the conversion rate of the Visa Class B common shares into Visa Class A common shares, the date on which such conversion is expected to occur and the estimated growth rate of the Visa Class A common share price. See “Visa Class B Common Shares” under Note 25, “Contingent Liabilities,Significant Accounting Policies,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,Data.of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
While Northern Trust believes its valuation methods for its assets and liabilities carried at fair value are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, theThe use of different methodologiesestimates and assumptions is required in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and actual results could differ from those estimates. The SEC has issued guidance relating to the disclosure of critical accounting estimates. Critical accounting estimates are those that require management to make subjective or complex judgments about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Changes that may be required in the underlying assumptions particularly as applied to Level 3 assets,or estimates in these areas could have a material effectimpact on Northern Trust’s future financial condition and results of operations.
For Northern Trust, accounting estimates that are viewed as critical are those relating to the computationallowance for credit losses and pension plan accounting. Management has discussed the development and selection of their estimated fair values.each critical accounting estimate with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (Audit Committee).
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet, with certain specified scope exceptions. Specifically within the lessee model under ASU 2016-02, a lessee is required to recognize on the balance sheet a liability to make future lease payments, known as the lease liability, and a right-of-use asset


66   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation63


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Allowance for Credit Losses
(ROU asset) representing its right to use the underlying asset over the lease term. Northern Trust has established a complete inventory of leases and has formalized the future operating model for lease accounting and related internal controls. ASU 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with certain practical expedients available. Northern TrustThe Corporation adopted ASU 2016-02 as of January 1, 2019, the date of initial application, and in doing so does not expect to restate comparative periods for the effects of applying ASU 2016-02. Northern Trust elected the package of practical expedients available under ASU 2016-02, which allows Northern Trust to forego a reassessment of (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (2) lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (3) the initial direct costs for any existing leases. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-02, Northern Trust will recognize operating lease liabilities of approximately $530 million, with corresponding ROU assets of approximately $480 million based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under Accounting Standards Codification 840 - Leases, and adjustments to the ROU assets for deferred rent required under ASU 2016-02. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 will not impact significantly Northern Trust’s consolidated results of operations.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASUUpdate (ASU) No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326):Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13). ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, which significantly changes the way impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of financial instruments. The main provisionsUpon adoption of ASU 2016-13, include (1) replacing the “incurred loss” approach under current GAAP with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost, (2) requiring entities to record anCorporation recorded a $13.7 million increase in the allowance for available-for-sale debt securities rather than reduce the carrying amountcredit losses with a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment to decrease retained earnings $10.1 million, net of the investments, as is required by the other-than-temporary-impairment model under current GAAP, and (3) a simplified accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. ASU 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, although early adoption is permitted.
Northern Trust has established a working group across various functions, an overall governance structure, and has finalized a detailed project plan for its implementation efforts. Further, Northern Trust is finalizing the development activities for its credit models, focusing initiallyincome taxes. For more information on its securities credit models. Northern Trust’s internal model validation group has started the review and validation process for these credit models. In addition, Northern Trust assessed the new disclosure requirements and evaluated the availability of required new data elements, and is in the process of drafting disclosures required under ASU 2016-13. Northern Trust continues to evaluate specific application issues and the overall impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13. 2016-13, please refer to Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The allowance for credit losses — which represents management’s estimate of lifetime expected credit losses related to various portfolios subject to credit risk, off-balance sheet credit exposure, and specific borrower relationships — is determined by management through a disciplined credit review process. Northern Trust measures expected credit losses of financial assets with similar risk characteristics on a collective basis. A financial asset is measured individually if it does not share similar risk characteristics with other financial assets and the related allowance is determined through an individual evaluation.
Management’s estimates utilized in establishing an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses are not dependent on any single assumption. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changesdetermining an appropriate allowance level, management evaluates numerous variables, many of which are interrelated or dependent on other assumptions and estimates, and takes into consideration past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Due to the Disclosure Requirementsinherent imprecision in accounting estimates, other estimates or assumptions could reasonably have been used in 2020 and changes in estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period.

The allowance for Fair Value Measurement” (ASU 2018-13)credit losses consists of the following components:

Evaluated on a Collective Basis: Expected credit losses are measured on a collective basis as long as the financial assets included in the respective pool share similar risk characteristics. If financial assets are deemed to not share similar risk characteristics, an individual assessment is warranted.
The allowance estimation methodology for the collective assessment is primarily based on internal loss data specific to the Northern Trust financial asset portfolio from a historical observation period that includes both expansionary and recessionary periods. The estimation methodology and the related qualitative adjustment framework segregate the loan and lease portfolio into segments based on loan and obligor-specific factors, including loan type, borrower type, collateral type, loan size, and borrower credit quality. For each segment, the probability of default and loss given default are derived for each quarter of the remaining life of each instrument. For the first two years (the reasonable and supportable period), these factors are derived by applying quarterly macroeconomic projections using models developed from historical data on macroeconomic factors and loans with similar factors. For periods beyond the reasonable and supportable period, Northern Trust reverts to its long-run historical loss experiences on a straight-line basis over four quarters. The exposure at default for every quarter is based on contractual balances as of each quarter-end, with adjustments made for potential draw-downs of revolving lines.
For each of the different parameters, specific credit models for the individual loan segments were developed. For each segment, the probability of defaultand the loss given default are applied to the exposure at default for each projected quarter to determine the quantitative component of the allowance. The quantitative allowance is then reviewed within the qualitative adjustment framework, through which management applies judgment by assessing internal risk factors, potential limitations in the quantitative methodology, and environmental factors that are not fully contemplated in the forecast to compute an adjustment to the quantitative allowance for each segment of the loan portfolio.
ASU 2016-13 requires the use of projected macroeconomic factors. Northern Trust’s current projection period is eight quarters, with a four-quarter straight-line reversion period to historical average loss rates. The Corporation uses multiple forecasts which are approved by Northern Trust’s Macroeconomic Scenario Development Committee (MSDC). The primary objectivebaseline forecast aligns with the Corporation’s latest thinking on macroeconomic projections for the next eight quarters. The forecasts are weighted at each evaluation period and are management’s best estimate of ASU 2018-13future economic projections at that time.
The allowance estimate is sensitive to improve the effectiveness of disclosureschanges in portfolio composition and quality, and macroeconomic forecasts. Increases in the notesamount of borrowing and material downgrades to financial statements. ASU 2018-13 is effectivethe quality of the lending portfolio will increase the reserve, all else equal. Similarly, deteriorating projections for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, although early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2018-13macroeconomic conditions will not impact significantlyincrease the reserve. Macroeconomic factors that are particularly correlated to Northern Trust’s consolidatedloan and lease portfolio are equity market values, market volatility, corporate profits, house and commercial real estate price indices, unemployment, and disposable income. The investment security and other financial condition or resultsassets exposure portfolios are less sensitive to macroeconomic factors in terms of operations.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwilloverall reserve impact due to factors such as high credit quality, short duration, and Other - Internal - Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (ASU 2018-15). ASU 2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, although early adoption is permitted. ASU 2018-15 is not expected to impact significantly Northern Trust’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes” (ASU 2018-16). ASU 2018-16 permits use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815. ASU 2018-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, although early adoption is permitted. ASU 2018-16 is not expected to impact significantly Northern Trust’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-17, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities” (ASU 2018-17). ASU 2018-17 requires that indirect interests held through related parties in common control arrangements should be considered on a proportional basis (rather than as the equivalent of a direct interest in its entirety) for determining whether fees paid to decision makers and service providers are variable interests. ASU 2018-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, although early adoption is permitted. ASU 2018-17 is not expected to impact significantly Northern Trust’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

low historical losses.



201864 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation67

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The results of the credit reserve estimation methodology are reviewed quarterly by Northern Trust’s Credit Loss Reserve Committee, which receives input from Credit Risk Management, Treasury, Corporate Finance, the Economic Research group, and each of Northern Trust’s business units. The Credit Loss Reserve Committee determines the probability weights applied to each forecast approved by MSDC, and also reviews and approves qualitative adjustments to the collective allowance in line with Northern Trust’s qualitative adjustment framework.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Capital expendituresEvaluated on an Individual Basis: The allowance is determined through an individual evaluation of financial assets considered impaired that is based on expected future cash flows, the value of collateral, and other factors that may impact the borrower’s ability to pay. For impaired loans for which the amount of allowance, if any, is determined based on the value of the underlying real estate collateral, third-party appraisals are typically obtained and utilized by management. These appraisals are generally less than twelve months old and are subject to adjustments to reflect management’s judgment as to the realizable value of the collateral.
The quarterly analysis of the individual and collective allowance components and the control process maintained by Credit Risk Management and the lending staff are the principal methods relied upon by management for the timely identification of, and adjustment for, changes in 2018 included ongoing enhancementsestimated credit loss levels. In addition to Northern Trust’s softwareown experience, management also considers regulatory guidance. Control processes and hardware capabilities,analyses employed to determine an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses are reviewed on at least an annual basis and modified as considered appropriate.
Management believes that the opening of new offices,allowance for credit losses adequately addresses these uncertainties and has been established at an appropriate level. Actual losses may vary from current estimates and the expansionamount of the provision for credit losses may be either greater than or less than actual net charge-offs.

Pension Plan Accounting
Northern Trust maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all U.S. employees (U.S. Qualified Plan) and renovationa U.S. noncontributory supplemental pension plan (U.S. Non-qualified Plan). Certain European-based employees also retain benefits in local defined benefit pension plans, of which the majority are closed to new employees and to future benefit accruals. Measuring cost and reporting liabilities resulting from defined benefit pension plans requires the use of several existing offices. Capital expendituresassumptions regarding future interest rates, asset returns, compensation increases, mortality rates, and other actuarially-based projections relating to the plans. Due to the long-term nature of this obligation and the estimates that are required to be made, the assumptions used in determining the periodic pension expense and the projected pension obligation are closely monitored and reviewed annually for 2018 totaled $506.0 million,adjustments that may be required. Pension accounting guidance requires that differences between estimates and actual experience be recognized as other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. The differences are amortized into net periodic pension expense from accumulated other comprehensive income over the average remaining service period of eligible participants. As a result, differences between the estimates made in the calculation of periodic pension expense and the projected pension obligation and actual experience affect stockholders’ equity in the period in which $408.4 million wasthey occur but continue to be recognized as expense systematically and gradually over subsequent periods.
Northern Trust recognizes the significant impact that these pension-related assumptions have on the determination of the pension obligations and related expense and has established procedures for software, $62.0 million was for computer hardware, $29.9 million was for buildingmonitoring and leasehold improvements,setting these assumptions each year. These procedures include an annual review of actual demographic and $5.7 million was for furnishings. These capital expenditures principally support, enhance,investment experience with the pension plans’ actuaries. In addition to actual experience, adjustments to these assumptions consider observable yields on fixed income securities, known compensation trends and protect Northern Trust’spolicies, as well as economic conditions and investment management, asset servicing and asset management capabilities, and provide relationship management tools to better serve our clients. Additional capital expenditures committed for technology systems will result in futurestrategies that may impact the estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets.
In determining the pension expense for the depreciationU.S. pension plans in 2020, Northern Trust utilized a discount rate of hardware3.37% for both the U.S. Qualified Plan and amortizationthe U.S. Non-qualified Plan. The rate of software. Software amortization and depreciationincrease in the compensation level is based on computer hardware and machinerya graded schedule from 9.00% to 2.50% that averaged 4.97%. The expected long-term rate of return on U.S. Qualified Plan assets was 5.25%.
In evaluating possible revisions to pension-related assumptions for the U.S. pension plans as of Northern Trust’s December 31, 2020 measurement date, the following were considered:
Discount Rate: Northern Trust estimates the discount rate for its U.S. pension plans by applying the plan specific projected cash flows for future benefit payments for each plan to the Aon AA Above Median yield curve as of the measurement date. This yield curve is composed of individual zero-coupon interest rates for 198 different time periods over a 99-year time horizon. Zero-coupon rates utilized by the yield curve are charged to equipment and software expense. Depreciation on building and leasehold improvements and on furnishings is charged to occupancy expense and equipment expense, respectively. Capital expendituresmathematically derived from observable market yields for 2017 totaled $472.8 million, of which $381.2 million was for software, $58.3 million was for computer hardware, $27.1 million was for building and leasehold improvements, and $6.2 million was for furnishings.
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Assets Under Custody/Administration and Assets Under Management
AA-rated corporate bonds. This yield curve model referenced by Northern Trust in establishing the normal course of business, holds assets under custody/administration and managementdiscount rate resulted in a fiduciary or agency capacity for its clients. In accordance with GAAP, these assets are not assetsrate of Northern Trust2.75% and are not included in its consolidated balance sheets.

Commitments, Letters of Credit and Securities Lent with Indemnification
Northern Trust, in the normal course of business, enters into various types of commitments and issues letters of credit to meet the liquidity and credit enhancement needs of its clients. The contractual amounts of these instruments represent the potential credit exposure should the instrument be drawn fully upon and the client default. To control the credit risk associated with entering into commitments and issuing letters of credit, Northern Trust subjects such activities to the same credit quality and monitoring controls as its lending activities. The following table provides details of Northern Trust’s off-balance-sheet financial instruments as of2.45% at December 31, 20182020 for the U.S. Qualified and 2017.U.S. Non-qualified Plans, respectively.

TABLE 36: SUMMARY OF OFF-BALANCE-SHEET FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH CONTRACT AMOUNTS
                        DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)2018
2017
Undrawn Commitments to Extend Credit  
One Year and Less$7,629.9
$8,617.3
Over One Year17,393.1
18,205.3
   
Total$25,023.0
$26,822.6
   
Standby Letters of Credit$2,486.2
$2,970.0
Commercial Letters of Credit32.3
37.7
Custody Securities Lent with Indemnification128,904.8
143,568.2


68   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation65


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Compensation Level: Based on a review of actual and anticipated salary experience, the compensation scale assumption is based on a graded schedule from 9.00% to 2.50% that averages 4.97%.
Undrawn commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since a significant portionRate of Return on Plan Assets: The expected return on plan assets is based on an estimate of the commitmentslong-term (30 years) rate of return on plan assets, which is determined using a building block approach that considers the current asset mix and estimates of return by asset class based on historical experience, giving proper consideration to diversification and rebalancing. Current market factors such as inflation and interest rates are also evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed to check for reasonability and appropriateness. As a result of these analyses, Northern Trust’s rate of return assumption for the U.S. Qualified Plan remains at 5.25% for 2021.
Mortality Table: As of December 31, 2020, Northern Trust has adopted the aggregate Pri-2012 mortality table with a 2012 base year, which was released by the Society of Actuaries in October 2019. Northern Trust’s pension obligations reflect proposed future improvement under scale MP-2020, which was released by the Society of Actuaries in October 2020. This assumption was updated at December 31, 2020 from improvement scale MP-2019. The updated improvement scale applies to annuity payments only and results in slightly lower projected mortality improvement rates than estimated by the MP-2019 improvement scale. Mortality assumptions on lump sum payments remain static and continue to be in line with the IRS prescribed table for minimum lump sums in 2021.

Net pension expense in 2021 is expected to expire without being drawn upon,increase slightly by approximately $1.2 million, primarily driven by the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future loans or liquidity requirements. The following table provides information aboutdecrease in discount rates in 2020.

In order to illustrate the industry sectorsensitivity of these assumptions on the expected U.S pension plans’ periodic pension expense in 2021 and expiration dates of undrawn commitments to extend creditthe projected benefit obligation as of December 31, 2018.

TABLE 37: UNDRAWN COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018              COMMITMENT EXPIRATION
($ In Millions)
TOTAL
COMMITMENTS

ONE YEAR
AND LESS

OVER ONE
YEAR

OUTSTANDING
LOANS

Commercial    
Commercial and Institutional    
Finance and Insurance$3,877.6
$1,745.1
$2,132.5
$1,644.2
Holding Companies


20.3
Manufacturing6,637.8
614.1
6,023.7
1,604.4
Mining723.1
184.9
538.2
21.1
Public Administration106.0
106.0

58.7
Retail Trade772.3
170.0
602.3
134.3
Services5,629.0
2,338.2
3,290.8
4,274.7
Transportation and Warehousing308.2
1.3
306.9
235.4
Utilities1,265.6

1,265.6
4.5
Wholesale Trade634.7
36.8
597.9
387.8
Other Commercial199.4
152.2
47.2
342.7
     
Commercial and Institutional (Note)20,153.7
5,348.6
14,805.1
8,728.1
Commercial Real Estate331.4
63.9
267.5
3,228.8
Lease Financing, net


90.7
Non-U.S.1,167.0
608.6
558.4
2,701.6
Other130.8
130.8

426.0
     
Total Commercial21,782.9
6,151.9
15,631.0
15,175.2
     
Personal    
Residential Real Estate824.0
194.0
630.0
6,514.0
Private Client2,395.4
1,263.3
1,132.1
10,733.3
Other20.7
20.7

67.5
     
Total Personal3,240.1
1,478.0
1,762.1
17,314.8
     
Total$25,023.0
$7,629.9
$17,393.1
$32,490.0

Note: Commercial and Institutional industry sector information2020, the following table is presented to show the effect of increasing or decreasing each of these assumptions by 25 basis points.

TABLE 45: SENSITIVITY OF U.S. PENSION PLANS ASSUMPTIONS
($ In Millions)25 BASIS
POINT INCREASE
25 BASIS
POINT DECREASE
Increase (Decrease) in 2021 Pension Expense
Discount Rate Change$(4.4)$4.6 
Compensation Level Change2.5 (2.5)
Rate of Return on Plan Assets Change(3.8)3.8 
Increase (Decrease) in 2020 Projected Benefit Obligation
Discount Rate Change(58.0)61.4 
Compensation Level Change10.8 (10.4)

Pension Contributions: The deduction limits specified by the Internal Revenue Code for contributions made by sponsors of defined benefit pension plans are based on a “Target Liability” under the basisprovisions of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).

Standby lettersPension Protection Act of credit obligate Northern Trust2006. There were no contributions to meet certain financial obligations of its clients, if, under the contractual terms ofU.S. Qualified Plan for the agreement,2020 plan year. The minimum required contribution to the clients are unable to do so. These instruments are primarily issued to support public and private financial commitments, including commercial paper, bond financing, initial margin requirements on futures exchanges and similar transactions. Northern TrustU.S. Qualified Plan is obligated to meet the entire financial obligation of these agreements and in certain cases is able to recover the amounts paid through recourse against collateral received or other participants. Standby letters of credit of $2.5 billion and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, include $72.3 million and $92.5 million, respectively, of standby letters of credit secured by cash deposits or participated to others. The weighted average maturity of standby letters of credit was 23 months at December 31, 2018 and 24 months at December 31, 2017.
As part of its securities custody activities and at the direction of its clients, Northern Trust lends securities owned by clients to borrowers who are reviewed and approved by the Northern Trust Capital Markets Credit Committee. In connection with these activities, Northern Trust has issued indemnifications to certain clients against certain losses that are a direct result of a borrower’s failure to return securities when due, should the value of such securities exceed the value of the collateral requiredexpected to be posted. Borrowers are required to collateralize fully securities received with cash or marketable securities. As securities are loaned, collateralzero in 2021. The maximum deductible contribution is maintainedestimated at a minimum of 100% of the fair value of the securities plus accrued interest. The collateral is revalued on a daily basis. The amount of securities loaned subject to indemnification was $128.9 billion and $143.6 billion at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Because of the credit quality of the$255.0 million for 2021.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 69

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


borrowers and the requirement to collateralize fully securities borrowed, management believes that the exposure to credit loss from this activity is not significant and no liability was recorded at December 31, 2018, or 2017 related to these indemnifications.
Additional information about Northern Trust’s off-balance-sheet financial instruments is included in Note 28, “Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments,” to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Variable Interest Entities
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) are defined within GAAP as entities which either have a total(1) lack sufficient equity investment that is insufficientat risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or whose(2) have equity investors that lack attributes typical of an equity investor, such as the characteristicsability to make significant decisions through voting rights affecting the entity’s operations, or the obligation to absorb expected losses or the right to receive residual returns of a controlling financial interest.the entity, or (3) are structured with voting rights that are disproportionate to the equity investor’s obligation to absorb losses or right to receive returns, and substantially all of the activities are conducted on behalf of the holder of the equity investment at risk with disproportionately few voting rights. Investors that finance a VIE through debt or equity interests or other counterparties that provide other forms of support, such as guarantees, subordinated fee arrangements, or certain types of derivative contracts, are variable interest holders in the entity and the variable interest holder, if any, that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entityentity’s economic performance and, athrough its variable interest, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns that could potentially be significant to the entity is deemed to be the VIE’s primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate the VIE.

Additional information about Northern Trust’s VIEs is included in Note 29, “Variable Interest Entities,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Leveraged Leases. In leveraged leasing transactions,
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The use of estimates and assumptions is required in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and actual results could differ from those estimates. The SEC has issued guidance relating to the disclosure of critical accounting estimates. Critical accounting estimates are those that require management to make subjective or complex judgments about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Changes that may be required in the underlying assumptions or estimates in these areas could have a material impact on Northern Trust’s future financial condition and results of operations.
For Northern Trust, actsaccounting estimates that are viewed as lessorcritical are those relating to the allowance for credit losses and pension plan accounting. Management has discussed the development and selection of each critical accounting estimate with the Audit Committee of the underlying asset subject to the lease and typically funds 20-30%Board of the asset’s cost via an equity ownership in a trust with the remaining 70-80% provided by third-party non-recourse debt holders. In such transactions, the trusts, which are VIEs, are created to provide the lessee use of the property with substantially all of the rights and obligations of ownership. The lessee’s maintenance and operation of the leased property has a direct effect on the fair value of the underlying property, and the lessee also has the ability to increase the benefits it can receive and limit the losses it can suffer by the manner in which it uses the property. As a result, Northern Trust has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the leveraged lease trust VIEs given it lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the leveraged lease trust VIEs.Directors (Audit Committee).

Tax Credit Structures. Northern Trust invests in qualified affordable housing projects and community development entities (collectively, community development projects) that are designed to generate a return primarily through the realization of tax credits. The community development projects are formed as limited partnerships and limited liability companies in which Northern Trust invests as a limited partner/investor member through equity contributions. The economic performance of the community development projects, some of which are VIEs, is subject to the performance of their underlying investment and their ability to operate in compliance with the rules and regulations necessary for the qualification of tax credits generated by equity investments. Northern Trust has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any community development project VIEs as it lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the underlying investments or to affect their ability to operate in compliance with the rules and regulations necessary for the qualification of tax credits generated by equity investments. This power is held by the general partners and managing members who exercise full and exclusive control of the operations of the community development project VIEs.

Investment Funds. Northern Trust acts as asset manager for various funds in which clients of Northern Trust are investors. As an asset manager of funds, Northern Trust earns a competitively priced fee that is based on assets managed and varies with each fund’s investment objective. Based on its analysis, Northern Trust has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs under GAAP.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
As the Corporation’s principal subsidiary encompassing all of Northern Trust’s banking activities, the Bank centrally manages liquidity for all U.S. and international banking operations. Liquidity is provided by a variety of sources, including client deposits (institutional and personal) from the C&IS and Wealth Management businesses, wholesale funding from the capital markets, maturities of short-term investments, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, and unencumbered liquid assets that can be sold or pledged to secure additional funds. While management does not view central bank discount windows as primary sources of liquidity, at December 31, 2018, the Bank had over $38.6 billion of securities and loans readily available as collateral to support discount window borrowings. The Bank also is active in the U.S. interbank funding market, providing an important source of additional liquidity and low-cost funds. Liquidity supports a variety of activities, including client withdrawals, purchases of securities, net loan growth, and draws on commitments to extend credit.


70   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation63


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Allowance for Credit Losses
Northern Trust maintains a very liquid balance sheet, with cash and due from banks, deposits with the Federal Reserve and other central banks, short-term money market assets and investment securities in aggregate representing 68% of total assets as of December 31, 2018. The market value of unencumbered securities at the Bank, which include those placed at the Federal Reserve discount window, totaled $47.3 billion at December 31, 2018. The Corporation andadopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13) on January 1, 2020, which significantly changes the Bank each satisfiedway impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the U.S. liquidity coverage ratio requirements during 2018.
The liquidityremaining life of financial instruments. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, the Corporation is managed separately from thatrecorded a $13.7 million increase in the allowance for credit losses with a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment to decrease retained earnings $10.1 million, net of income taxes. For more information on the Bank. The primary sourcesadoption of cash for the Corporation are issuances of debt or equity, dividend payments from the Bank, and interest earned on investment securities and money market assets. On August 3, 2018, the Corporation issued $500 million of 3.650% senior notes, due August 3, 2028. The Corporation also received $1.2 billion of dividends from the Bank in 2018. Dividends from the Bank are subjectASU 2016-13, please refer to certain restrictions, as discussed in further detail in Note 31, “Restrictions on Subsidiary Dividends and Loans or Advances,2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements, to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The Corporation’s usesallowance for credit losses — which represents management’s estimate of cash consist mainlylifetime expected credit losses related to various portfolios subject to credit risk, off-balance sheet credit exposure, and specific borrower relationships — is determined by management through a disciplined credit review process. Northern Trust measures expected credit losses of dividend paymentsfinancial assets with similar risk characteristics on a collective basis. A financial asset is measured individually if it does not share similar risk characteristics with other financial assets and the related allowance is determined through an individual evaluation.
Management’s estimates utilized in establishing an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses are not dependent on any single assumption. In determining an appropriate allowance level, management evaluates numerous variables, many of which are interrelated or dependent on other assumptions and estimates, and takes into consideration past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Due to the Corporation’s stockholders;inherent imprecision in accounting estimates, other estimates or assumptions could reasonably have been used in 2020 and changes in estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period.

The allowance for credit losses consists of the paymentfollowing components:

Evaluated on a Collective Basis: Expected credit losses are measured on a collective basis as long as the financial assets included in the respective pool share similar risk characteristics. If financial assets are deemed to not share similar risk characteristics, an individual assessment is warranted.
The allowance estimation methodology for the collective assessment is primarily based on internal loss data specific to the Northern Trust financial asset portfolio from a historical observation period that includes both expansionary and recessionary periods. The estimation methodology and the related qualitative adjustment framework segregate the loan and lease portfolio into segments based on loan and obligor-specific factors, including loan type, borrower type, collateral type, loan size, and borrower credit quality. For each segment, the probability of principaldefault and interest to note holders; repurchasesloss given default are derived for each quarter of its common stock;the remaining life of each instrument. For the first two years (the reasonable and investments in, orsupportable period), these factors are derived by applying quarterly macroeconomic projections using models developed from historical data on macroeconomic factors and loans with similar factors. For periods beyond the reasonable and supportable period, Northern Trust reverts to its subsidiaries.long-run historical loss experiences on a straight-line basis over four quarters. The most significantexposure at default for every quarter is based on contractual balances as of each quarter-end, with adjustments made for potential draw-downs of revolving lines.
For each of the different parameters, specific credit models for the individual loan segments were developed. For each segment, the probability of defaultand the loss given default are applied to the exposure at default for each projected quarter to determine the quantitative component of the allowance. The quantitative allowance is then reviewed within the qualitative adjustment framework, through which management applies judgment by assessing internal risk factors, potential limitations in the quantitative methodology, and environmental factors that are not fully contemplated in the forecast to compute an adjustment to the quantitative allowance for each segment of the loan portfolio.
ASU 2016-13 requires the use of projected macroeconomic factors. Northern Trust’s current projection period is eight quarters, with a four-quarter straight-line reversion period to historical average loss rates. The Corporation uses multiple forecasts which are approved by Northern Trust’s Macroeconomic Scenario Development Committee (MSDC). The baseline forecast aligns with the Corporation’s latest thinking on macroeconomic projections for the next eight quarters. The forecasts are weighted at each evaluation period and are management’s best estimate of cash by the Corporation during 2018 were $924.3 million of common stock repurchases and $405.4 million of common stock dividends.future economic projections at that time.
The Corporation’s liquidity, defined asallowance estimate is sensitive to changes in portfolio composition and quality, and macroeconomic forecasts. Increases in the amount of cashborrowing and highly marketable assets, was $866.8 million and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. During, and at year-end, 2018 and 2017, these assets were comprised almost entirely of cash in a demand deposit account at the Bank or overnight money market placements, both of which were fully availablematerial downgrades to the Corporation to support its own cash flow requirements or those of its subsidiaries, as needed. Average liquidity during 2018 and 2017 was $887.0 million and $750.5 million, respectively. The cash flowsquality of the Corporationlending portfolio will increase the reserve, all else equal. Similarly, deteriorating projections for macroeconomic conditions will increase the reserve. Macroeconomic factors that are shownparticularly correlated to Northern Trust’s loan and lease portfolio are equity market values, market volatility, corporate profits, house and commercial real estate price indices, unemployment, and disposable income. The investment security and other financial assets exposure portfolios are less sensitive to macroeconomic factors in Note 34, “Northern Trust Corporation (Corporation only),”terms of overall reserve impact due to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statementsfactors such as high credit quality, short duration, and Supplementary Data.”
A significant source of liquidity for both the Corporation and the Bank is the ability to draw funding from capital markets globally. The credit ratings of the Corporation and the Bank as of December 31, 2018, provided below, allow Northern Trust to access capital markets on favorable terms.

TABLE 38: NORTHERN TRUST CREDIT RATINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018low historical losses.



        CREDIT RATING
STANDARD &
POOR’S
MOODY’SFITCHRATINGS
Northern Trust Corporation:
Senior DebtA+A2AA-
Subordinated DebtAA2A+
Preferred StockBBB+Baa1BBB
Trust Preferred Capital SecuritiesBBB+A3BBB+
OutlookStableStableStable
The Northern Trust Company:
Short-Term DepositA-1+P-1F1+
Long-Term DepositAA-Aa2AA
Subordinated DebtA+A2A+
OutlookStableStableStable

A significant downgrade in one or more of these ratings could limit Northern Trust’s access to capital markets and/or increase the rates paid for short-term borrowings, including deposits, and future long-term debt issuances. The size of these rate increases would depend on multiple factors, including the extent of the downgrade, Northern Trust’s relative debt rating compared to other financial institutions, current market conditions, and other factors. In addition, as discussed in Note 26, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” Northern Trust enters into certain master netting arrangements with derivative counterparties that contain credit-risk-related contingent features in which the counterparty has the option to declare Northern Trust in default and accelerate cash settlement of net derivative liabilities with the counterparty in the event Northern Trust’s credit rating falls below specified levels. The net maximum amount of these termination payments that Northern Trust could have been required to pay at December 31, 2018, was $7.6 million. Other than these credit-risk-related contingent derivative counterparty payments, Northern Trust had no long-term debt covenants or other credit-risk-related payments at December 31, 2018, that would be triggered by a significant downgrade in its debt ratings.


201864 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation71

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The results of the credit reserve estimation methodology are reviewed quarterly by Northern Trust’s Credit Loss Reserve Committee, which receives input from Credit Risk Management, Treasury, Corporate Finance, the Economic Research group, and each of Northern Trust’s business units. The Credit Loss Reserve Committee determines the probability weights applied to each forecast approved by MSDC, and also reviews and approves qualitative adjustments to the collective allowance in line with Northern Trust’s qualitative adjustment framework.
Statements
Evaluated on an Individual Basis: The allowance is determined through an individual evaluation of Cash Flowsfinancial assets considered impaired that is based on expected future cash flows, the value of collateral, and other factors that may impact the borrower’s ability to pay. For impaired loans for which the amount of allowance, if any, is determined based on the value of the underlying real estate collateral, third-party appraisals are typically obtained and utilized by management. These appraisals are generally less than twelve months old and are subject to adjustments to reflect management’s judgment as to the realizable value of the collateral.
ForThe quarterly analysis of the year endedindividual and collective allowance components and the control process maintained by Credit Risk Management and the lending staff are the principal methods relied upon by management for the timely identification of, and adjustment for, changes in estimated credit loss levels. In addition to Northern Trust’s own experience, management also considers regulatory guidance. Control processes and analyses employed to determine an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses are reviewed on at least an annual basis and modified as considered appropriate.
Management believes that the allowance for credit losses adequately addresses these uncertainties and has been established at an appropriate level. Actual losses may vary from current estimates and the amount of the provision for credit losses may be either greater than or less than actual net charge-offs.

Pension Plan Accounting
Northern Trust maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all U.S. employees (U.S. Qualified Plan) and a U.S. noncontributory supplemental pension plan (U.S. Non-qualified Plan). Certain European-based employees also retain benefits in local defined benefit pension plans, of which the majority are closed to new employees and to future benefit accruals. Measuring cost and reporting liabilities resulting from defined benefit pension plans requires the use of several assumptions regarding future interest rates, asset returns, compensation increases, mortality rates, and other actuarially-based projections relating to the plans. Due to the long-term nature of this obligation and the estimates that are required to be made, the assumptions used in determining the periodic pension expense and the projected pension obligation are closely monitored and reviewed annually for adjustments that may be required. Pension accounting guidance requires that differences between estimates and actual experience be recognized as other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. The differences are amortized into net periodic pension expense from accumulated other comprehensive income over the average remaining service period of eligible participants. As a result, differences between the estimates made in the calculation of periodic pension expense and the projected pension obligation and actual experience affect stockholders’ equity in the period in which they occur but continue to be recognized as expense systematically and gradually over subsequent periods.
Northern Trust recognizes the significant impact that these pension-related assumptions have on the determination of the pension obligations and related expense and has established procedures for monitoring and setting these assumptions each year. These procedures include an annual review of actual demographic and investment experience with the pension plans’ actuaries. In addition to actual experience, adjustments to these assumptions consider observable yields on fixed income securities, known compensation trends and policies, as well as economic conditions and investment strategies that may impact the estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets.
In determining the pension expense for the U.S. pension plans in 2020, Northern Trust utilized a discount rate of 3.37% for both the U.S. Qualified Plan and the U.S. Non-qualified Plan. The rate of increase in the compensation level is based on a graded schedule from 9.00% to 2.50% that averaged 4.97%. The expected long-term rate of return on U.S. Qualified Plan assets was 5.25%.
In evaluating possible revisions to pension-related assumptions for the U.S. pension plans as of Northern Trust’s December 31, 2018, net2020 measurement date, the following were considered:
Discount Rate: Northern Trust estimates the discount rate for its U.S. pension plans by applying the plan specific projected cash providedflows for future benefit payments for each plan to the Aon AA Above Median yield curve as of the measurement date. This yield curve is composed of individual zero-coupon interest rates for 198 different time periods over a 99-year time horizon. Zero-coupon rates utilized by operating activitiesthe yield curve are mathematically derived from observable market yields for AA-rated corporate bonds. This yield curve model referenced by Northern Trust in establishing the discount rate resulted in a rate of 2.75% and 2.45% at December 31, 2020 for the U.S. Qualified and U.S. Non-qualified Plans, respectively.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 65

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Compensation Level: Based on a review of actual and anticipated salary experience, the compensation scale assumption is based on a graded schedule from 9.00% to 2.50% that averages 4.97%.
Rate of Return on Plan Assets: The expected return on plan assets is based on an estimate of the long-term (30 years) rate of return on plan assets, which is determined using a building block approach that considers the current asset mix and estimates of return by asset class based on historical experience, giving proper consideration to diversification and rebalancing. Current market factors such as inflation and interest rates are also evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed to check for reasonability and appropriateness. As a result of these analyses, Northern Trust’s rate of return assumption for the U.S. Qualified Plan remains at 5.25% for 2021.
Mortality Table: As of December 31, 2020, Northern Trust has adopted the aggregate Pri-2012 mortality table with a 2012 base year, which was $1.8 billion,released by the Society of Actuaries in October 2019. Northern Trust’s pension obligations reflect proposed future improvement under scale MP-2020, which was released by the Society of Actuaries in October 2020. This assumption was updated at December 31, 2020 from improvement scale MP-2019. The updated improvement scale applies to annuity payments only and results in slightly lower projected mortality improvement rates than estimated by the MP-2019 improvement scale. Mortality assumptions on lump sum payments remain static and continue to be in line with the IRS prescribed table for minimum lump sums in 2021.

Net pension expense in 2021 is expected to increase slightly by approximately $1.2 million, primarily reflecting period earningsdriven by the decrease in discount rates in 2020.

In order to illustrate the sensitivity of these assumptions on the expected U.S pension plans’ periodic pension expense in 2021 and the impactprojected benefit obligation as of other operating activities and non-cash charges such as amortizationDecember 31, 2020, the following table is presented to show the effect of computer software, partially offsetincreasing or decreasing each of these assumptions by higher net collateral deposited with derivative counterparties25 basis points.
Net cash provided
TABLE 45: SENSITIVITY OF U.S. PENSION PLANS ASSUMPTIONS
($ In Millions)25 BASIS
POINT INCREASE
25 BASIS
POINT DECREASE
Increase (Decrease) in 2021 Pension Expense
Discount Rate Change$(4.4)$4.6 
Compensation Level Change2.5 (2.5)
Rate of Return on Plan Assets Change(3.8)3.8 
Increase (Decrease) in 2020 Projected Benefit Obligation
Discount Rate Change(58.0)61.4 
Compensation Level Change10.8 (10.4)

Pension Contributions: The deduction limits specified by operating activitiesthe Internal Revenue Code for contributions made by sponsors of defined benefit pension plans are based on a “Target Liability” under the provisions of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. There were no contributions to the U.S. Qualified Plan for the year ended2020 plan year. The minimum required contribution to the U.S. Qualified Plan is expected to be zero in 2021. The maximum deductible contribution is estimated at $255.0 million for 2021.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires certain assets and liabilities to be reported at fair value. As of December 31, 2017, was $1.7 billion, primarily reflecting earnings2020, approximately 25% of Northern Trust’s total assets and approximately 1% of its total liabilities were carried on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. As discussed more fully in Note 3, “Fair Value Measurements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” GAAP requires entities to categorize financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value according to a three-level valuation hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted, active market prices for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1) and the impactlowest priority to valuation techniques that require significant management judgment because one or more of non-cash charges suchthe significant inputs are unobservable in the market place (Level 3). Approximately 7% of Northern Trust’s assets carried at fair value are classified as amortizationLevel 1. Northern Trust typically does not hold equity securities or other instruments that are actively traded on an exchange.
Approximately 93% of computer software, partially offset by other operating activities.Northern Trust’s assets and 98% of its liabilities carried at fair value are categorized as Level 2, as they are valued using models in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets. Investment debt
Net cash provided by investing activities was $4.3 billion



66 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
securities classified as available for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily reflecting decreased levelssale make up 97% of depositsLevel 2 assets with the Federal Reserve and other central banks and lower interest-bearing deposits with banks, partially offset by net purchasesremaining 3% primarily consisting of debt securitiesderivative financial instruments. Level 2 liabilities are comprised solely of derivative financial instruments.
Northern Trust’s Level 2 assets include available for sale and trading account securities, the fair values of which are determined predominantly by external pricing vendors. Northern Trust has a well-established process to validate prices received from pricing vendors as discussed more fully in Note 3, “Fair Value Measurements,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
As of December 31, 2020, all derivative assets and liabilities, excluding the swap related to the sale of certain Visa Class B common shares described below, were classified as Level 2 and approximately 95%, measured on a notional value basis, related to client-related and trading activities, predominantly consisting of foreign exchange contracts. Derivative instruments are valued internally using widely accepted income-based models that incorporate inputs readily observable in actively quoted markets and reflect contractual terms of contracts. Northern Trust evaluated the impact of counterparty credit risk and its own credit risk on the valuation of derivative instruments. Factors considered included the likelihood of default by Northern Trust and its counterparties, the remaining maturities of the instruments, net exposures after giving effect to master netting agreements, available collateral, and other credit enhancements in determining the appropriate fair value of derivative instruments. The resulting valuation adjustments are not considered material.
As of December 31, 2020, Northern Trust’s Level 3 liabilities consisted of swaps that Northern Trust entered into with the purchaser of 1.1 million and 1.0 million shares of Visa Inc. Class B common stock (Visa Class B common shares) previously held by Northern Trust and sold in June 2016 and 2015, respectively. Pursuant to maturitythe swaps, Northern Trust retains the risks associated with the ultimate conversion of the Visa Class B common shares into shares of Visa Inc. Class A common stock (Visa Class A common shares), such that the counterparty will be compensated for any dilutive adjustments to the conversion ratio and Northern Trust will be compensated for any anti-dilutive adjustments to the ratio. The swaps also require periodic payments from Northern Trust to the counterparty calculated by reference to the market price of Visa Class A common shares and a fixed rate of interest. The fair value of the swaps are determined using a discounted cash flow methodology. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement are Northern Trust’s own assumptions about estimated changes in the conversion rate of the Visa Class B common shares into Visa Class A common shares, the date on which such conversion is expected to occur and the net changeestimated growth rate of the Visa Class A common share price. See “Visa Class B Common Shares” under Note 26, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further information.
While Northern Trust believes its valuation methods for its assets and liabilities carried at fair value are appropriate and consistent with other investingmarket participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions, particularly as applied to Level 3 assets, could have a material effect on the computation of their estimated fair values.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
In January 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2020-01, “Investments—Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815” (ASU 2020-01). ASU 2020-01 addresses two accounting issues: (1) application of the measurement alternative under Topic 321 in correlation with the transition into and out of the equity method under Topic 323 and (2) the measurement of certain forward contracts and purchased options to acquire equity securities. ASU 2020-01 clarifies that an entity applying the measurement alternative under Topic 321 that must transition to the equity method under Topic 323 because of an observable transaction will remeasure its investment immediately before transition, whereas an entity applying the equity method under Topic 323 that must transition to Topic 321 because of an observable transaction will remeasure its investment immediately after transition. ASU 2020-01 also clarifies that certain forward contracts or purchased call options to acquire equity securities generally will be measured using the fair value principles of Topic 321 before settlement or exercise. ASU 2020-01 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, although early adoption is permitted. ASU 2020-01 is not expected to have a significant impact on Northern Trust’s consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of income.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, “Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity” (ASU 2020-06). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the convertible instrument accounting framework through the elimination of the beneficial conversion and cash conversion accounting models used to account for convertible debt and convertible preferred stock. ASU 2020-06 also amends the accounting for certain contracts in an entity’s own equity that are currently accounted for as derivatives because of specific settlement provisions in Accounting Standards Codification 815—Derivatives and Hedging. In addition, ASU 2020-06 modifies how particular convertible instruments and certain contracts that may be settled in cash or shares impact the diluted earnings per share
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 67

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
computation. ASU 2020-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021, although early adoption is permitted. ASU 2020-06 is not expected to have a significant impact on Northern Trust’s consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of income.

In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-08, “Codification Improvements to Subtopic 310-20, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs” (ASU 2020-08). ASU 2020-08 clarifies the Codification related to the standard issued in ASU No. 2017-08, “Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities”. ASU 2020-08 clarifies that an entity should amortize premiums on purchased callable debt securities to the first call date and related call amount and at that point reassess if there is a remaining premium to amortize to a subsequent call date. ASU 2020-08 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, although early adoption is permitted. ASU 2020-08 is not expected to have a significant impact on Northern Trust’s consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of income.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management Overview
Northern Trust employs an integrated risk management framework to support its business decisions and the execution of its corporate strategies. The framework provides a methodology to identify, manage and govern both internal and external risks to Northern Trust, and promotes a culture of risk awareness and good conduct across the organization. Northern Trust’s risk culture encompasses the general awareness, attitude and conduct of employees with respect to risk and the management of risk across all lines of defense within the organization. Northern Trust cultivates a culture of effective risk management by defining and embedding risk management accountabilities in all employee performance expectations and provides training, development and performance rewards to reinforce this culture.
Northern Trust’s risk management framework contains three inter-related elements, designed to support consistent enterprise risk identification, management and reporting: a comprehensive risk inventory, a static taxonomy of risk categories and a dynamic taxonomy of risk themes. The risk inventory is a detailed register of the risks inherently faced by Northern Trust. The risk categories and risk themes are classification systems used for classifying and managing the risk inventory and enabling different risk profile views. All identified risks inherent in Northern Trust’s business activities are cataloged into the following risk categories: credit, operational, fiduciary, compliance, market, liquidity, and strategic risk. All material risks are also dynamically cataloged into various risk themes which are defined groupings that share common characteristics, focus on business outcomes and span across risk categories.
Northern Trust implements its risk management framework through a “three lines of defense” operating model, embedding a robust risk management capability within its businesses. The model, used to communicate risk management expectations across the organization, contains three roles, each with a complementary level of risk management accountability. Within this operating model, Northern Trust’s businesses are the first line of defense for protecting it against the risks inherent in its businesses and are supported by dedicated business risk management teams. The Risk Management function, the second line of defense, sets the direction for Northern Trust’s risk management activities and provides aggregate risk oversight and reporting in support of risk governance. Audit Services, the third line of defense, provides independent assurance as to the effectiveness of the integrated risk framework.

Risk Governance and Oversight Overview
Risk governance is an integral aspect of corporate governance at Northern Trust, and includes clearly defined accountabilities, expectations, internal controls and processes for risk-based decision-making and escalation of issues. The following diagram provides a high-level overview of Northern Trust’s risk governance structure, highlighting oversight by the Board of Directors and key risk-related committees.

TABLE 46: RISK GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Northern Trust Corporation Board of Directors
Audit CommitteeBusiness Risk CommitteeCapital Governance CommitteeCompensation and Benefits Committee
-Cybersecurity Risk Oversight Subcommittee
Global Enterprise Risk Committee (GERC)
Credit Risk CommitteeOperational Risk CommitteeFiduciary Risk CommitteeCompliance & Ethics Oversight CommitteeMarket & Liquidity Risk CommitteeModel Risk Oversight Committee




68 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Board of Directors provides oversight of risk management directly and through certain of its committees: the Audit Committee, the Business Risk Committee, the Capital Governance Committee and the Compensation and Benefits Committee. The Board of Directors approves Northern Trust’s Risk Management Framework and Corporate Risk Appetite Statement. The Business Risk Committee assumes primary responsibility and oversight with respect to credit risk, operational risk, fiduciary risk, compliance risk, market risk, liquidity risk, strategic risk, and associated risk themes. The Cybersecurity Risk Oversight Subcommittee of the Business Risk Committee assists the Business Risk Committee in discharging its duties with respect to risks related to cybersecurity inherent in Northern Trust’s businesses. The Audit Committee provides oversight with respect to financial reporting and legal risk, while the Compensation and Benefits Committee oversees the development and operation of Northern Trust’s incentive compensation program. The Compensation and Benefits Committee annually reviews management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the design and performance of Northern Trust’s incentive compensation arrangements and practices in providing incentives that are consistent with Northern Trust’s safety, soundness, and culture. This assessment includes an evaluation of whether Northern Trust’s incentive compensation arrangements and practices discourage inappropriate risk-taking behavior by participants. The Capital Governance Committee assists the Board in discharging its oversight duties with respect to capital management and resolution planning activities. Among other responsibilities, the Capital Governance Committee oversees Northern Trust’s capital adequacy assessments, forecasting, and stress testing processes and activities, including the annual CCAR exercise, and challenges management, as appropriate, on various elements of such processes and activities. Accordingly, the Capital Governance Committee provides oversight with respect to Northern Trust’s linkage of material risks to the capital adequacy assessment process.
Net cash used
The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) oversees Northern Trust’s management of risk and compliance, promotes risk awareness and fosters a proactive risk management environment wherein risks inherent in investing activities was $14.0 billionthe business strategy are identified, understood, appropriately monitored and mitigated. The CRO reports directly to the Business Risk Committee and the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer. The CRO regularly advises the Business Risk Committee and reports to the Committee at least quarterly on risk exposures, risk management deficiencies and emerging risks. In accordance with the risk management framework, the CRO and the Risk Management executive leadership team of Northern Trust, together with the Chief Financial Officer, Head of Capital and Resolution Planning, General Counsel and Chief Audit Executive, meet as the Global Enterprise Risk Committee (GERC) to provide executive management oversight and guidance with respect to the management of the categories of risk and risk themes within Northern Trust. Among other risk management responsibilities, GERC receives reports, escalations, or recommendations from senior risk committees that are responsible for the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily attributablemanagement of risk, and from time to an increasetime may delegate responsibility to such committees for risk issues. Senior risk committees include:

The Credit Risk Committee (CRC) establishes and monitors credit-related policies and practices throughout Northern Trust and promotes their uniform application.

The Operational Risk Committee (ORC) provides independent oversight and is responsible for setting the operational risk-related policies and developing and implementing the operational risk management framework and programs that support coordination of operational risk activities.

The Fiduciary Risk Committee (FRC) is responsible for establishing and reviewing the fiduciary risk policies and establishing the fiduciary risk framework, governance and programs that support the coordination of fiduciary risk activities.

The Compliance & Ethics Oversight Committee (CEOC) provides oversight and direction with respect to compliance policies, implementation of the compliance and ethics program, and the coordination of regulatory compliance initiatives across the Corporation.

The Market & Liquidity Risk Committee (MLRC) oversees activities relating to the management of market and liquidity risks by facilitating a focused review of market and liquidity risk exposures and providing rigorous challenge of related policies, key assumptions, and practices.

The Model Risk Oversight Committee (MROC) is responsible for providing management attention, direction, and oversight of the model risk management framework and model risk within Northern Trust.

In addition to the aforementioned committees, Northern Trust establishes business and regional risk committees that also report into GERC.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 69

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Risk Assessment, Appetite and Reporting Processes
As part of the integrated risk framework, Northern Trust has established key risk identification and risk management processes, embedded within its businesses to enable a risk-informed profile that supports its business decisions and the execution of its corporate strategies. Northern Trust’s risk assessment process consists of a series of programs across the first and second lines of defense that identify, measure, manage and report risks in depositsline with risk appetite and guidelines.
Northern Trust defines its risk appetite as the Federal Reserveaggregate level and types of risk the Board of Directors and senior management are willing to assume to achieve the Corporation’s strategic objectives and business plan, consistent with prudent management of risk and applicable capital, liquidity, and other central banksregulatory requirements. It includes consideration of the likelihood and impact of risks, using both monetary loss and non-financial measures across risk themes to monitor against tolerance thresholds and guideline levels that trigger escalation to risk committees, senior management, and the Board of Directors or committees thereof, as appropriate.

Risk Control
Risk Control is an internal, independent review function within the Risk Management function. Risk Control is managed by the Head of Risk Control and is comprised of Model Risk Management, Credit Review, Global Compliance Testing and Basel Independent Verification groups, each with its own risk focus and oversight. Model Risk Management is responsible for the implementation and management of the enterprise-wide model risk framework and independently validating new models and reviewing and re-validating existing models. Credit Review provides an independent, ongoing assessment of credit exposure and related credit risk management processes across Northern Trust. Global Compliance Testing evaluates the effectiveness of procedures and controls designed to comply with relevant laws and regulations, as well as net purchasescorresponding Northern Trust policies governing regulatory compliance activities. Lastly, Basel Independent Verification promotes rigor and accuracy in Northern Trust’s ongoing compliance with Basel III requirements and adherence to Enhanced Prudential Standards, including liquidity stress testing. The Business Risk Committee has oversight responsibility with respect to Risk Control generally as well as each of debtthese groups.

Audit Services
Audit Services is an independent control function that assesses and validates controls within Northern Trust’s risk management framework. Audit Services is managed by the Chief Audit Executive with oversight from the Audit Committee. Audit Services tests the overall adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal controls associated with the framework on an ongoing basis and reports the results of these audits directly to the Audit Committee. Audit Services includes professionals with a broad range of audit and industry experience, including risk management expertise. The Chief Audit Executive reports directly to the Audit Committee and the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and is a non-voting member of GERC.

Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk to interest income or principal from the failure of a borrower, issuer, or counterparty to perform on an obligation.

Credit Risk Overview
Credit risk is inherent in many of Northern Trust’s activities. A significant component of credit risk relates to loans, leases, securities, heldand counterparty-related exposures. Northern Trust’s loan portfolio differs significantly from those of other large U.S. financial institutions in that Northern Trust is generally:
not an originator of loan products to be sold into a secondary market or to be bundled into asset securitizations;
not an agent bank or syndicator of loans, where risk management is achieved post-close through the sale of participations; and
not a participant in leveraged financial transactions, such as project finance, private-equity-originated acquisition financing or hedge fund leveraging.

Credit Risk Framework and Governance
The Credit Risk Management function is the focal point of the credit risk framework and, while independent of the businesses, it works closely with them to achieve the goal of assuring proactive management of credit risk. To monitor and control credit risk, the Credit Risk Management function maintains a framework that consists of policies, standards, and programs designed to promote a prudent relationship-based credit culture. This function also monitors adherence to corporate policies, standards, programs, and external regulations.
The Credit Risk Management function provides a system of checks and balances for Northern Trust’s diverse credit-related activities by monitoring these activities and practices and promoting their uniform application throughout Northern Trust.



70 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The credit risk framework provides authorities for approval of the extension of credit. Individual credit authority for commercial and personal loans is limited to specified amounts and maturities. Credit requests exceeding individual authority because of amount, rating, term or other conditions, are referred to the relevant Group Credit Approval Committee. Credit decisions involving exposure in excess of these limits require the approval of the Senior Credit Committee. The Capital Markets Credit Committee has sole credit authority for the approval, modification, or renewal of credit exposure to all wholesale market counterparties.
The Credit Risk Committee establishes and monitors credit-related policies and programs throughout Northern Trust and promotes their uniform application. The Chief Credit Officer reports directly to the CRO and chairs the CRC. Independent oversight and review of the credit risk framework also is provided by Risk Control.

Credit Risk Measurement
An integral component of credit risk measurement is Northern Trust’s internal risk rating system. Northern Trust’s internal risk rating system enables identification, measurement, approval and monitoring of credit risk. Calculations include entity-specific information about the obligor’s or counterparty’s probability of default and exposure-specific information about loss given default, exposure at default and maturity.
ForThe Credit Risk Management function is responsible for the year endedongoing oversight of each model that supports the internal risk-rating system. Independent model governance and oversight is further supported by the activities of Risk Control.

Loans and Other Extensions of Credit
A significant component of credit risk relates to the loan portfolio, including contractual obligations such as legally binding commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These contractual obligations and arrangements are discussed in the “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” section and in Note 26, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Undrawn commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since a significant portion of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future loans or liquidity requirements. The following table provides information about the industry sector and expiration dates of undrawn commitments to extend credit as of December 31, 2018, net2020.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 71

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE 47: UNDRAWN COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020COMMITMENT EXPIRATION
($ In Millions)TOTAL
COMMITMENTS
ONE YEAR
AND LESS
OVER ONE
YEAR
OUTSTANDING
LOANS
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional
Finance and Insurance$4,435.8 $2,454.1 $1,981.7 $3,085.0 
Holding Companies   28.8 
Manufacturing6,945.6 1,061.3 5,884.3 1,422.8 
Mining785.6 259.5 526.1 5.2 
Public Administration98.4 98.4  24.1 
Retail Trade903.1 350.5 552.6 164.0 
Services6,150.7 2,626.4 3,524.3 4,329.0 
Transportation and Warehousing283.1 0.2 282.9 214.2 
Utilities1,286.2 38.3 1,247.9 7.2 
Wholesale Trade749.6 108.4 641.2 427.3 
Other Commercial195.2 100.9 94.3 350.7 
Commercial and Institutional(1)
21,833.3 7,098.0 14,735.3 10,058.3 
Commercial Real Estate252.3 93.0 159.3 3,558.4 
Lease Financing, net   11.4 
Non-U.S.1,250.2 609.0 641.2 1,345.7 
Other106.1 106.1  288.2 
Total Commercial23,441.9 7,906.1 15,535.8 15,262.0 
Personal
Residential Real Estate676.1 91.2 584.9 6,035.7 
Private Client4,248.9 3,014.0 1,234.9 11,815.1 
Non-U.S.571.6 249.2 322.4 597.9 
Other   49.0 
Total Personal5,496.6 3,354.4 2,142.2 18,497.7 
Total$28,938.5 $11,260.5 $17,678.0 $33,759.7 
(1) Commercial and Institutional industry sector information is presented on the basis of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
As part of Northern Trust’s credit processes, the Credit Risk Management function oversees a range of portfolio reviews that focus on significant and/or weaker-rated credits. This approach allows management to take remedial action in an effort to deal with potential problems. An integral part of the Credit Risk Management function is a formal review of past due and potential problem loans to determine which credits, if any, need to be placed on nonaccrual status or charged off. Northern Trust maintains a loan portfolio watch list for adversely classified credit exposures that includes all nonaccrual credits as well as other loans with elevated risk of default. Independent from the Credit Risk Management function, Credit Review undertakes both on-site and off-site file reviews that evaluate effectiveness of management’s implementation of the Credit Risk Management’s requirements.

Counterparty Credit Risk
Counterparty credit risk for Northern Trust primarily arises from a variety of funding, treasury, trading and custody-related activities, including over-the-counter (OTC) currency and interest rate derivatives, and from indemnified securities lending transactions. Credit exposure to counterparties is managed by use of a framework for setting limits by product type and exposure tenor.
To calculate exposure, Northern Trust treats repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and indemnified securities lending transactions as repo-style transactions. Foreign exchange exposures and interest rate derivatives are treated as OTC derivatives. The exposure at default measurement methodology for each eligible type of counterparty credit exposure, including the use of netting and collateral as risk mitigants, is determined based on operational requirements, the characteristics of the contract type and the portfolio size and complexity.

Credit Risk Mitigation
Northern Trust considers cash flow to be the primary source of repayment for client-related credit exposures. However, Northern Trust employs several different types of credit risk mitigants to manage its overall credit risk in the event cash flow is not sufficient to repay a credit exposure. Northern Trust broadly groups its risk mitigation techniques into the following three primary categories.



72 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Physical and Financial Collateral: Northern Trust’s primary risk mitigation approaches include the requirement of collateral. Residential and commercial real estate exposures are typically secured by properly margined mortgages on the property. In cases where loans to commercial or certain Wealth Management clients are secured by marketable securities, the daily values of the securities are monitored closely to ensure adherence to collateral coverage policies.

Netting: On-balance sheet netting is employed where applicable for counterparties with master netting agreements. Netting is primarily related to foreign exchange transactions with major banks and institutional clients subject to eligible master netting agreements. Northern Trust has elected to take the credit risk mitigation capital benefit of netting within its regulatory capital calculation at this time.

Guarantees: Personal and corporate guarantees are often taken to facilitate potential collection efforts and to protect Northern Trust’s claims relative to other creditors. Northern Trust has elected not to take the credit risk mitigation capital benefit of guarantors within its regulatory capital calculation at this time.

Another important risk management practice is the avoidance of undue concentrations of exposure, such as in any single (or small number of related) obligor/counterparty, loan type, industry, geography, country or risk mitigant. Processes are in place to establish limits on certain concentrations and the monitoring of adherence to the limits.

Operational Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, human factors and systems, or from external events.

Operational Risk Overview
Operational risk is inherent in each of Northern Trust’s businesses and corporate functions and reflects the potential for inadequate information systems, operating problems, product design and delivery difficulties, potential legal actions, or other catastrophes to result in losses. This includes the potential that continuity of service and resiliency may be impacted.

Operational risk includes compliance, fiduciary and legal risks, which under the Corporation’s risk structure are governed and managed explicitly.

Operational Risk Framework and Governance
To monitor and control operational risk, Northern Trust maintains a framework consisting of risk management policies, programs and practices designed to promote a sound operational environment and maintain the Corporation’s operational risk profile and losses within approved risk appetites and guidelines. The framework is deployed consistently and globally across all businesses and its objective is to identify and measure the factors that influence risk and drive action to reduce future loss events. The Operational Risk Management function is responsible for defining the operational risk framework and providing independent oversight of the framework across Northern Trust. It is the responsibility of each business to implement the enterprise-wide operational risk framework and business-specific risk management programs to identify, monitor, measure, manage and report on operational risk and mitigate Northern Trust’s exposure to loss. Several key programs support the operational risk framework, including:
Loss Event Data Program - a program that collects internal and external loss data for use in monitoring operational risk exposure, various business analyses and a Basel Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) capital quantification.
Risk and Control Self-Assessment - a comprehensive, structured risk management process used by Northern Trust’s businesses to identify, measure, monitor and mitigate operational risk exposures throughout the enterprise.
Operational Risk Scenario Analysis - a systematic process of obtaining expert opinions from business managers and risk management experts to derive reasoned assessments of the likelihood of occurrence and the potential loss impact of plausible operational losses.
Product and Process Risk Management Program - a program used for evaluating and managing risks associated with the introduction of new and modified noncredit products and services, significant changes to operating processes, and related significant loss events.
Outsourcing Risk Management Program - a program that provides processes for appropriate risk assessment, measurement, monitoring and management of outsourced technology and business process outsourcing.
Information Security and Technology Risk Management - a program that communicates and implements risk management processes and controls to address information security, including cyber threats, technology and compliance risks to the organization.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 73

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operational Resiliency and Recovery Management Program - a program designed to protect life safety, minimize business impact and support the resumption of mission-critical and economic functions for clients following an incident.
Physical Security - a program that provides for the safety of Northern Trust partners, clients, and visitors worldwide.
Insurance Management Program - a program designed to reduce the monetary impact of certain operational loss events.

As discussed in financingRisk Control, Model Risk Management also is part of the operational risk framework.

The ORC is responsible for overseeing the activities totaled $5.8 billion,of Northern Trust related to the management of operational risk including establishing and maintaining the Corporate Operational Risk Policy and approving the operational risk framework and programs. This committee has the expanded role of coordinating operational risk issues related to compliance and fiduciary risks. The purpose of this committee is to provide executive management’s insight and guidance to the management of existing and emerging operational risks. This includes identification and assessment of evolving risk trends across the operational risk framework and how these can be best managed.

Operational Risk Measurement
Northern Trust utilizes the AMA capital quantification process to estimate required capital for the Corporation and applicable U.S. banking subsidiaries. Northern Trust’s AMA capital quantification process incorporates outputs from the Loss Event Data, Risk and Control Self-Assessment and Operational Risk Scenario Analysis programs to derive required capital. Business environment factor information is used to estimate loss frequency. The AMA capital quantification process uses a Loss Distribution Approach methodology to combine frequency and severity distributions to arrive at an estimate of the potential aggregate loss at the 99.9th percentile of the aggregate loss distribution over a one-year time horizon.

Information Security and Technology Risk Management
Effective management of risks related to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information is crucial in an environment of increasing cyber threat and requires a structured approach to establish and communicate expectations and required practices. Northern Trust’s information security and technology risk management framework includes a comprehensive governance structure and an Information Security and Technology Risk Management Policy and Program approved by the Business Risk Committee. The framework is supported by an organizational structure that reflects support from executive management and includes risk committees comprised of members from across the businesses, including the Information Security and Technology Risk Committee (ISTRC). The ISTRC is chaired by the Chief Information Risk Officer, who regularly reports to the Business Risk Committee on the status of the Information Security and Technology Risk Management Program.
The governance process, internal controls and risk management practices are designed to keep risk at levels appropriate to Northern Trust’s overall risk appetite and the inherent risk in the markets in which Northern Trust operates. Northern Trust employees are responsible for promoting information security as well as adhering to applicable policies and standards and other means provided to them to safeguard electronic information and business systems within their care. Training and awareness programs to educate employees on information security are ongoing and include multiple approaches such as mandatory computer-based training, phishing simulations, and the designation of individuals as Information Security and Privacy Champions within the businesses. In cases where Northern Trust relies on vendors to perform services, controls are routinely reviewed for alignment with industry standards and their ability to protect information. Any findings identified are remediated following a risk-based approach.
In addition to the various information security controls managed and monitored within the organization, Northern Trust uses external third-party security teams on a regular basis to assess effectiveness. These teams perform security program maturity assessments, penetration tests, security assessments and reviews of Northern Trust’s susceptibility to cyber-attacks. Northern Trust operates a global security operations center for threat identification and response. This center aggregates security threat information from systems and platforms across the businesses, and alerts the organization in accordance with its documented Cyber Incident Response Plan.
The Cyber Incident Response Plan is used to respond to cybersecurity incidents. A cybersecurity incident is defined as an incident caused by damaging activity, which requires actions to prevent and respond to disruptions, denials, compromises or exfiltration that impact the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the assets of Northern Trust or its clients. The plan provides a streamlined approach that can be invoked rapidly to address matters that raise enterprise concern and to communicate impact, actions and status to senior management, including the Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Information Risk Officer, and appropriate stakeholders. The plan is designed to work with enterprise-level response plans, and is reviewed, tested, and updated regularly.



74 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Northern Trust’s disclosure procedures and controls also address cybersecurity incidents and include elements to ensure that there is an analysis of potential disclosure obligations arising from any such incidents. Northern Trust also maintains compliance programs to address the applicability of restrictions on securities trading while in possession of material, nonpublic information, including in instances in which such information may relate to cybersecurity incidents.

Operational Resiliency and Recovery Management
Northern Trust’s operational resiliency approach encompasses operational resiliency and recovery processes enterprise-wide (including staff, technology and facilities) to ensure that following a disaster or business interruption Northern Trust resumes mission-critical business and economic functions and fulfills all regulatory and legal requirements.
Northern Trust’s operational resiliency mitigation and preventative measures include sophisticated physical security, resilient designs and peer capacity for its corporate data centers, a highly redundant global network, robust network security, resiliency centers that offer alternative workstations, transfer of work and work-from-home programs that provide further capability.
All of Northern Trust’s businesses are required to risk-assess their critical functions regularly and develop business continuity plans covering resource requirements (people, systems, vendor relationships and other assets), arrangements for obtaining these resources and prioritizing the resumption of each function in compliance with corporate standards. The strength of the business continuity programs of all critical third-party vendors to Northern Trust are reviewed on a regular basis. All of Northern Trust’s businesses test their plans at least annually. The ORC annually reviews and presents the corporate business continuity plan to the Business Risk Committee. In 2020, Northern Trust utilized these business continuity plans to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Northern Trust has also begun exploring the integration of climate-related scenario analyses into its broader risk management program to help align with certain recommendations of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). In the context of operational risk, the main focus of these climate-related scenario analyses is on operational resiliency and recovery. Conducting such scenario analyses and assessing the magnitude of climate-related financial and non-financial risks and opportunities related to Northern Trust’s global assets is intended to position the organization to navigate uncertain climate futures more effectively.

Fiduciary Risk
Fiduciary risks are risks arising from the failure in administering or managing financial and other assets in clients’ fiduciary accounts: i) to adhere to a fiduciary standard of care if required under the terms of governing documents or applicable laws; or ii) to properly discharge fiduciary duties. Fiduciary status may hinge on the nature of a particular function being performed and fiduciary standards may vary by jurisdiction, type of relationship and governing document.

Fiduciary Risk Overview
The fiduciary risk management framework identifies, assesses, measures, monitors and reports on fiduciary risk matters deemed significant. Fiduciary risk is mitigated through internal controls and risk management practices that are designed to identify, understand and keep such risk at levels consistent with the organization’s overall risk appetite while also managing the inherent risk in each relationship for which Northern Trust serves in a fiduciary capacity. Each business is responsible for complying with all corporate policies and external regulations and for establishing specific procedures, standards and guidelines to manage fiduciary risk within the desired risk appetite.
Fiduciary Risk Framework and Governance
The FRC is responsible for overseeing activities related to the exercise of fiduciary powers throughout the organization and for establishing and reviewing the fiduciary risk policies and the fiduciary risk framework that supports the coordination of activities to identify, monitor, manage and report on fiduciary risk. In addition, the FRC serves as an escalation point for significant issues raised by its subcommittees or elsewhere in the organization.
Compliance Risk
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, financial loss, or damage to reputation resulting from failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, other regulatory requirements, or codes of conduct and other standards of self-regulatory organizations applicable to Northern Trust. Compliance risk includes the following two subcategories:
Regulatory Risk - risk arising from failure to comply with prudential and conduct of business or other regulatory requirements.
Financial Crime Risk - risk arising from financial crime (e.g., money laundering, sanctions violations, fraud, insider dealing, theft, etc.) in relation to the products, services, or accounts of the institution, its clients, or others associated with the same.

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 75

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Compliance Risk Framework and Governance
The compliance risk management framework identifies, assesses, controls, measures, monitors and reports on compliance risk. The framework is designed to minimize compliance risk and maintain an environment in which criminal or regulatory violations do not occur. The framework includes a comprehensive governance structure and a Compliance and Ethics Program approved by the Business Risk Committee.
Each business is responsible for the implementation and effectiveness of the Compliance and Ethics Program and specific compliance policies within their respective businesses. Each business is responsible for its respective employees’ compliance with corporate policies and external regulations and for establishing specific procedures, standards and guidelines to manage compliance risk in accordance with Northern Trust’s Compliance and Ethics Program.
The CEOC establishes and monitors adherence to Northern Trust’s Compliance and Ethics Program. The Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer reports to the Business Risk Committee, as appropriate, and chairs the CEOC.

Liquidity Risk Management

Liquidity Risk Overview
Liquidity risk is the risk of not being able to raise sufficient funds or maintain collateral to meet balance sheet and contingent liability cash flow obligations when due, because of firm-specific or market-wide stress events.
Northern Trust maintains a strong liquidity position and liquidity risk profile. Northern Trust’s balance sheet is primarily reflecting decreasedliability-driven. That is, the main driver of balance sheet changes comes from changing levels of totalclient deposits, the repurchase of common stock pursuantwhich are generally related to the Corporation’s share repurchase program, lower securities soldlevel of custody assets serviced and commercial and personal deposits and can also be influenced by market conditions. This liability-driven business model differs from a typical asset-driven business model, where increased levels of deposits and wholesale borrowings are required to support, for example, increased levels of lending. Northern Trust’s balance sheet is generally comprised of high-quality assets that are managed to meet anticipated obligations under agreementsstress, resulting in low liquidity risk. Current elevated levels of client deposits driven by market conditions are actively managed and monitored.

Liquidity Risk Framework and Governance
Northern Trust maintains a liquidity risk framework consisting of risk management policies and practices to repurchase, dividends paid on common and preferred stock, and repaymentskeep its risk profile within the Board-approved Corporate Risk Appetite Statement. All liquidity risk activities are overseen by the Risk Management function, which is independent of the 6.50% subordinated notes previously issuedbusinesses undertaking the activities.
The Liquidity Management Policy and exposure limits for liquidity risk are set by the BankBoard, and due August 2018, partially offset by higher short-term other borrowingscommittee structures have been established to implement and monitor adherence to corporate policies, external regulations and established procedures. Limits are monitored based on measures such as the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and the proceeds fromliquidity stress-testing buffer across a range of time horizons. Treasury, in the issuance byfirst line of defense, proposes liquidity risk management strategies and is responsible for performing liquidity management activities.The Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) provides first line management oversight and is responsible for approving strategies and activities within the Corporationrisk appetite, monitoring risk metrics, overseeing balance sheet resources, and reviewing reporting such as cash flows, LCR, and stress test results.
The Market and Liquidity Risk Management Committee (MLRC), in the second line of 3.65% senior notes. The decrease in total deposits was primarily attributable to lower levels of non-interest bearing domestic and non-U.S. office client deposits and lower domestic interest-bearing client deposits.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash provided by financing activities totaled $11.3 billion, primarily reflecting higher levels of total deposits, federal funds purchased, increases in short-term other borrowings, and the proceeds from the issuance by the Corporation of 3.375% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes, partially offset by the repurchase of common stock pursuantdefense, provides challenge to the Corporation’s share repurchase program, dividends paid on commonfirst line activities, evaluates compliance with regulatory requirements and preferred stock,process effectiveness, and repaymentsescalates material items for corrective action. The MLRC provides second line oversight and is responsible for reviewing market and liquidity risk exposures, approving and monitoring risk metrics, and approving key methodologies and assumptions that drive liquidity risk measurement.

Liquidity Risk Analysis, Monitoring, and Reporting
Liquidity risk is analyzed and monitored in order to ensure compliance with the approved risk appetite. Various liquidity analysis and monitoring activities are employed by Northern Trust to understand better the nature and sources of its liquidity risks, including: liquidity stress testing, liquidity metric monitoring, collateral management, intraday management, cash flow projections, operational deposit modeling, liquid asset buffer measurement, funds transfer pricing, and contingency funding planning.
The liquidity risk management process is supported through management and regulatory reporting. Both Northern Trust’s Treasury and Market and Liquidity Risk Management functions produce management reports that enable oversight bodies to make informed decisions and support management of liquidity risk within the 5.85% subordinated notes previously issued byapproved risk appetite. Holistic liquidity metrics such as LCR and internal liquidity stress testing are actively monitored, along with a suite of other metrics that provide early warning indicators of changes in the Bank and due November 2017.risk profile.





76 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Regulatory EnvironmentRISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management Overview
Northern Trust actively follows regulatory developments and regularly evaluates its liquidityemploys an integrated risk management framework to support its business decisions and the execution of its corporate strategies. The framework provides a methodology to identify, manage and govern both internal and external risks to Northern Trust, and promotes a culture of risk awareness and good conduct across the organization. Northern Trust’s risk culture encompasses the general awareness, attitude and conduct of employees with respect to risk and the management of risk across all lines of defense within the organization. Northern Trust cultivates a culture of effective risk management by defining and embedding risk management accountabilities in all employee performance expectations and provides training, development and performance rewards to reinforce this culture.
Northern Trust’s risk management framework contains three inter-related elements, designed to support consistent enterprise risk identification, management and reporting: a comprehensive risk inventory, a static taxonomy of risk categories and a dynamic taxonomy of risk themes. The risk inventory is a detailed register of the risks inherently faced by Northern Trust. The risk categories and risk themes are classification systems used for classifying and managing the risk inventory and enabling different risk profile views. All identified risks inherent in Northern Trust’s business activities are cataloged into the following risk categories: credit, operational, fiduciary, compliance, market, liquidity, and strategic risk. All material risks are also dynamically cataloged into various risk themes which are defined groupings that share common characteristics, focus on business outcomes and span across risk categories.
Northern Trust implements its risk management framework through a “three lines of defense” operating model, embedding a robust risk management capability within its businesses. The model, used to communicate risk management expectations across the organization, contains three roles, each with a complementary level of risk management accountability. Within this operating model, Northern Trust’s businesses are the first line of defense for protecting it against proposed rulemakingthe risks inherent in its businesses and industry best practicesare supported by dedicated business risk management teams. The Risk Management function, the second line of defense, sets the direction for Northern Trust’s risk management activities and provides aggregate risk oversight and reporting in ordersupport of risk governance. Audit Services, the third line of defense, provides independent assurance as to comply with applicable regulationsthe effectiveness of the integrated risk framework.

Risk Governance and further enhance its liquidity policies. Please refer to “Liquidity Standards” under “SupervisionOversight Overview
Risk governance is an integral aspect of corporate governance at Northern Trust, and Regulation” in Item 1, “Business,”includes clearly defined accountabilities, expectations, internal controls and processes for risk-based decision-making and escalation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of applicable liquidity standards.

Contractual Obligations
issues. The following table showsdiagram provides a high-level overview of Northern Trust’s contractual obligations asrisk governance structure, highlighting oversight by the Board of December 31, 2018.Directors and key risk-related committees.


TABLE 39: CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 201846: RISK GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Northern Trust Corporation Board of Directors
Audit CommitteeBusiness Risk CommitteeCapital Governance CommitteeCompensation and Benefits Committee
-Cybersecurity Risk Oversight Subcommittee
               PAYMENT DUE BY PERIOD
($ In Millions)TOTAL
ONE YEAR
AND LESS

1-3
YEARS

3-5 YEARS
OVER 5
YEARS

Senior Notes(1)
$2,011.3
$
$998.8
$499.2
$513.3
Subordinated Debt(1)
1,112.4



1,112.4
Floating Rate Capital Debt(1)
277.6



277.6
Operating Leases(2)
763.1
98.8
183.7
144.9
335.7
Purchase Obligations(3)
715.2
260.9
301.8
140.9
11.6
      
Total Contractual Obligations$4,879.6
$359.7
$1,484.3
$785.0
$2,250.6
Global Enterprise Risk Committee (GERC)
Credit Risk CommitteeOperational Risk CommitteeFiduciary Risk CommitteeCompliance & Ethics Oversight CommitteeMarket & Liquidity Risk CommitteeModel Risk Oversight Committee

Note: Obligations as shown do not include deposit liabilities or interest requirements on funding sources.
(1) Refer to Note 12, “Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt,” and Note 13, “Floating Rate Capital Debt,” to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further details.
(2) Refer to Note 10, “Lease Commitments,” to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further details.
(3) Purchase obligations consist primarily of ongoing operating costs related to outsourcing arrangements for certain cash management services and the support and maintenance of the Corporation’s technological requirements. Certain obligations are in the form of variable rate contracts and, in some instances, 2018 activity was used as a base to project future obligations.







72   201868 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Capital Management
OneThe Board of Northern Trust’s primary objectives is to maintain a strong capital position to meritDirectors provides oversight of risk management directly and through certain of its committees: the confidence of clients, counterparties, creditors, regulators and stockholders. A strong capital position helps Northern Trust execute its strategies and withstand unforeseen adverse developments.
Senior management, with oversight fromAudit Committee, the Business Risk Committee, the Capital Governance Committee and the fullCompensation and Benefits Committee. The Board of Directors is responsible forapproves Northern Trust’s Risk Management Framework and Corporate Risk Appetite Statement. The Business Risk Committee assumes primary responsibility and oversight with respect to credit risk, operational risk, fiduciary risk, compliance risk, market risk, liquidity risk, strategic risk, and associated risk themes. The Cybersecurity Risk Oversight Subcommittee of the Business Risk Committee assists the Business Risk Committee in discharging its duties with respect to risks related to cybersecurity inherent in Northern Trust’s businesses. The Audit Committee provides oversight with respect to financial reporting and legal risk, while the Compensation and Benefits Committee oversees the development and operation of Northern Trust’s incentive compensation program. The Compensation and Benefits Committee annually reviews management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the design and performance of Northern Trust’s incentive compensation arrangements and practices in providing incentives that are consistent with Northern Trust’s safety, soundness, and culture. This assessment includes an evaluation of whether Northern Trust’s incentive compensation arrangements and practices discourage inappropriate risk-taking behavior by participants. The Capital Governance Committee assists the Board in discharging its oversight duties with respect to capital management and planning. Northern Trust manages its capital on both a total Corporation basis and a legal entity basis. The Capital Committee is responsible for measuring and managing capital metrics against levels set forth within the Capital Policy approved byresolution planning activities. Among other responsibilities, the Capital Governance Committee oversees Northern Trust’s capital adequacy assessments, forecasting, and stress testing processes and activities, including the annual CCAR exercise, and challenges management, as appropriate, on various elements of such processes and activities. Accordingly, the Capital Governance Committee provides oversight with respect to Northern Trust’s linkage of material risks to the capital adequacy assessment process.

The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) oversees Northern Trust’s management of risk and compliance, promotes risk awareness and fosters a proactive risk management environment wherein risks inherent in the business strategy are identified, understood, appropriately monitored and mitigated. The CRO reports directly to the Business Risk Committee and the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer. The CRO regularly advises the Business Risk Committee and reports to the Committee at least quarterly on risk exposures, risk management deficiencies and emerging risks. In accordance with the risk management framework, the CRO and the Risk Management executive leadership team of Northern Trust, together with the Chief Financial Officer, Head of Capital and Resolution Planning, General Counsel and Chief Audit Executive, meet as the Global Enterprise Risk Committee (GERC) to provide executive management oversight and guidance with respect to the management of the Boardcategories of Directors. Inrisk and risk themes within Northern Trust. Among other risk management responsibilities, GERC receives reports, escalations, or recommendations from senior risk committees that are responsible for the management of risk, and from time to time may delegate responsibility to such committees for risk issues. Senior risk committees include:

The Credit Risk Committee (CRC) establishes and monitors credit-related policies and practices throughout Northern Trust and promotes their uniform application.

The Operational Risk Committee (ORC) provides independent oversight and is responsible for setting the operational risk-related policies and developing and implementing the operational risk management framework and programs that support coordination of operational risk activities.

The Fiduciary Risk Committee (FRC) is responsible for establishing and reviewing the fiduciary risk policies and establishing the metrics relatedfiduciary risk framework, governance and programs that support the coordination of fiduciary risk activities.

The Compliance & Ethics Oversight Committee (CEOC) provides oversight and direction with respect to capital, a varietycompliance policies, implementation of factors are taken into consideration, including the unique risk profiles of Northern Trust’s businesses, regulatory requirements, capital levels relative to peers,compliance and ethics program, and the impact on credit ratings.coordination of regulatory compliance initiatives across the Corporation.
Capital levels were strengthened in 2018 as average stockholders’ equity increased $248.3 million, or 2%, reaching $10.2 billion. Total stockholders’ equity was $10.5 billion at December 31, 2018, as compared
The Market & Liquidity Risk Committee (MLRC) oversees activities relating to $10.2 billion at December 31, 2017. the management of market and liquidity risks by facilitating a focused review of market and liquidity risk exposures and providing rigorous challenge of related policies, key assumptions, and practices.

The Model Risk Oversight Committee (MROC) is responsible for providing management attention, direction, and oversight of the model risk management framework and model risk within Northern Trust.

In July 2018,addition to the Board increased the quarterly common stock dividend by 31% to $0.55 per common share. Common dividends totaling $439.1 million were declared in 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Corporation repurchased 9.0 million shares of common stock, including 0.5 million shares withheld related to share-based compensation, at an average price per share of $102.69. Preferred dividends totaling $46.4 million were declared in 2018.

aforementioned committees, Northern Trust establishes business and regional risk committees that also report into GERC.
20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 7369

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



In accordanceRisk Assessment, Appetite and Reporting Processes
As part of the integrated risk framework, Northern Trust has established key risk identification and risk management processes, embedded within its businesses to enable a risk-informed profile that supports its business decisions and the execution of its corporate strategies. Northern Trust’s risk assessment process consists of a series of programs across the first and second lines of defense that identify, measure, manage and report risks in line with risk appetite and guidelines.
Northern Trust defines its risk appetite as the aggregate level and types of risk the Board of Directors and senior management are willing to assume to achieve the Corporation’s strategic objectives and business plan, consistent with prudent management of risk and applicable capital, liquidity, and other regulatory requirements. It includes consideration of the likelihood and impact of risks, using both monetary loss and non-financial measures across risk themes to monitor against tolerance thresholds and guideline levels that trigger escalation to risk committees, senior management, and the Board of Directors or committees thereof, as appropriate.

Risk Control
Risk Control is an internal, independent review function within the Risk Management function. Risk Control is managed by the Head of Risk Control and is comprised of Model Risk Management, Credit Review, Global Compliance Testing and Basel Independent Verification groups, each with its own risk focus and oversight. Model Risk Management is responsible for the implementation and management of the enterprise-wide model risk framework and independently validating new models and reviewing and re-validating existing models. Credit Review provides an independent, ongoing assessment of credit exposure and related credit risk management processes across Northern Trust. Global Compliance Testing evaluates the effectiveness of procedures and controls designed to comply with relevant laws and regulations, as well as corresponding Northern Trust policies governing regulatory compliance activities. Lastly, Basel Independent Verification promotes rigor and accuracy in Northern Trust’s ongoing compliance with Basel III requirements capital ratios are calculated using bothand adherence to Enhanced Prudential Standards, including liquidity stress testing. The Business Risk Committee has oversight responsibility with respect to Risk Control generally as well as each of these groups.

Audit Services
Audit Services is an independent control function that assesses and validates controls within Northern Trust’s risk management framework. Audit Services is managed by the standardizedChief Audit Executive with oversight from the Audit Committee. Audit Services tests the overall adequacy and advanced approaches. For each ratio, the lowereffectiveness of the result calculated undersystem of internal controls associated with the standardized approachframework on an ongoing basis and reports the results of these audits directly to the Audit Committee. Audit Services includes professionals with a broad range of audit and industry experience, including risk management expertise. The Chief Audit Executive reports directly to the Audit Committee and the advanced approach servesCorporation’s Chief Executive Officer and is a non-voting member of GERC.

Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk to interest income or principal from the failure of a borrower, issuer, or counterparty to perform on an obligation.

Credit Risk Overview
Credit risk is inherent in many of Northern Trust’s activities. A significant component of credit risk relates to loans, leases, securities, and counterparty-related exposures. Northern Trust’s loan portfolio differs significantly from those of other large U.S. financial institutions in that Northern Trust is generally:
not an originator of loan products to be sold into a secondary market or to be bundled into asset securitizations;
not an agent bank or syndicator of loans, where risk management is achieved post-close through the sale of participations; and
not a participant in leveraged financial transactions, such as project finance, private-equity-originated acquisition financing or hedge fund leveraging.

Credit Risk Framework and Governance
The Credit Risk Management function is the effective ratio for purposesfocal point of determining capital adequacy. the credit risk framework and, while independent of the businesses, it works closely with them to achieve the goal of assuring proactive management of credit risk. To monitor and control credit risk, the Credit Risk Management function maintains a framework that consists of policies, standards, and programs designed to promote a prudent relationship-based credit culture. This function also monitors adherence to corporate policies, standards, programs, and external regulations.
The following tableCredit Risk Management function provides a reconciliationsystem of the Corporation’s common stockholders’ equity to total risk-based capitalchecks and its risk-based capital ratios, under the applicable U.S. regulatory rules as of December 31, 2018balances for Northern Trust’s diverse credit-related activities by monitoring these activities and 2017.

TABLE 40: CAPITAL ADEQUACY
($ In Millions)December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
 
Advanced
Approach
Standardized
Approach
Advanced
Approach
Standardized
Approach
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital    
Common Stockholders’ Equity$9,626.3
$9,626.3
$9,334.2
$9,334.2
Net Unrealized (Gains) Losses on Debt Securities Available for Sale

15.0
15.0
Net Unrealized (Gains) Losses on Cash Flow Hedges

(0.9)(0.9)
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net of Deferred Tax Liability(767.6)(767.6)(697.4)(697.4)
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments

68.4
68.4
Other(128.9)(128.9)(93.0)(93.0)
     
Total Common Equity Tier 18,729.8
8,729.8
8,626.3
8,626.3
Additional Tier 1 Capital    
Preferred Stock882.0
882.0
882.0
882.0
Other(15.1)(15.1)(34.9)(34.9)
     
Total Additional Tier 1 Capital866.9
866.9
847.1
847.1
     
Total Tier 1 Capital9,596.7
9,596.7
9,473.4
9,473.4
Tier 2 Capital    
Qualifying Allowance for Credit Losses
138.2

153.8
Qualifying Subordinated Debt1,099.4
1,099.4
1,099.4
1,099.4
Floating Rate Capital107.7
107.7
134.6
134.6
     
Total Tier 2 Capital1,207.1
1,345.3
1,234.0
1,387.8
     
Total Risk-Based Capital$10,803.8
$10,942.0
$10,707.4
$10,861.2
Risk-Weighted Assets(1)
$63,914.8
$67,837.1
$64,018.7
$68,616.4
Total Assets – End of Period (EOP)132,212.5
132,212.5
138,590.5
138,590.5
Adjusted Average Fourth Quarter Assets(2)
120,402.6
120,402.6
121,517.1
121,517.1
Total Loans and Leases – EOP32,490.0
32,490.0
32,592.2
32,592.2
Common Stockholders’ Equity to:    
Total Loans and Leases – EOP29.63%29.63%28.64%28.64%
Total Assets – EOP7.28
7.28
6.74
6.74
Risk-Based Capital Ratios    
Common Equity Tier 113.7%12.9%13.5%12.6%
Tier 115.0
14.1
14.8
13.8
Total (Tier 1 and Tier 2)16.9
16.1
16.7
15.8
Leverage8.0
8.0
7.8
7.8
Supplementary Leverage(3)
7.0
N/A
6.8
N/A

(1) Risk-weighted assets exclude, as applicable under each regulatory approach, amounts primarily related to goodwill, certain other intangible assets,practices and net unrealized gains or losses on securities and reflect adjustments for excess allowances for credit losses that have been excluded from Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital, if any.
(2) Adjusted average fourth quarter assets exclude amounts primarily related to goodwill, other intangible assets, and net unrealized gains or losses on securities.
(3) Beginning with the first quarter of 2015, advanced approaches banking organizations must calculate and reportpromoting their supplementary leverage ratio. Effective January 1, 2018, the Corporation and Bank are subject to a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 3 percent.

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Corporation’s capital ratios exceeded the minimum requirements for classification as “well-capitalized” under applicable U.S. regulatory requirements. Further information regarding the Corporation’s and the Bank’s capital ratios and the minimum requirements for classification as “well-capitalized” is provided in the “Supervision and Regulation” section of Item 1, “Business,” and Note 33, “Regulatory Capital Requirements,” to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

uniform application throughout Northern Trust.



74   201870 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The credit risk framework provides authorities for approval of the extension of credit. Individual credit authority for commercial and personal loans is limited to specified amounts and maturities. Credit requests exceeding individual authority because of amount, rating, term or other conditions, are referred to the relevant Group Credit Approval Committee. Credit decisions involving exposure in excess of these limits require the approval of the Senior Credit Committee. The Capital Markets Credit Committee has sole credit authority for the approval, modification, or renewal of credit exposure to all wholesale market counterparties.
AsThe Credit Risk Committee establishes and monitors credit-related policies and programs throughout Northern Trust and promotes their uniform application. The Chief Credit Officer reports directly to the CRO and chairs the CRC. Independent oversight and review of the credit risk framework also is provided by Risk Control.

Credit Risk Measurement
An integral component of credit risk measurement is Northern Trust’s internal risk rating system. Northern Trust’s internal risk rating system enables identification, measurement, approval and monitoring of credit risk. Calculations include entity-specific information about the obligor’s or counterparty’s probability of default and exposure-specific information about loss given default, exposure at default and maturity.
The Credit Risk Management function is responsible for the ongoing oversight of each model that supports the internal risk-rating system. Independent model governance and oversight is further supported by the activities of Risk Control.

Loans and Other Extensions of Credit
A significant component of credit risk relates to the loan portfolio, including contractual obligations such as legally binding commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These contractual obligations and arrangements are discussed in the “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” section and in Note 26, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Undrawn commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since a significant portion of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future loans or liquidity requirements. The following table provides information about the industry sector and expiration dates of undrawn commitments to extend credit as of December 31, 2018,2020.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 71

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE 47: UNDRAWN COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020COMMITMENT EXPIRATION
($ In Millions)TOTAL
COMMITMENTS
ONE YEAR
AND LESS
OVER ONE
YEAR
OUTSTANDING
LOANS
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional
Finance and Insurance$4,435.8 $2,454.1 $1,981.7 $3,085.0 
Holding Companies   28.8 
Manufacturing6,945.6 1,061.3 5,884.3 1,422.8 
Mining785.6 259.5 526.1 5.2 
Public Administration98.4 98.4  24.1 
Retail Trade903.1 350.5 552.6 164.0 
Services6,150.7 2,626.4 3,524.3 4,329.0 
Transportation and Warehousing283.1 0.2 282.9 214.2 
Utilities1,286.2 38.3 1,247.9 7.2 
Wholesale Trade749.6 108.4 641.2 427.3 
Other Commercial195.2 100.9 94.3 350.7 
Commercial and Institutional(1)
21,833.3 7,098.0 14,735.3 10,058.3 
Commercial Real Estate252.3 93.0 159.3 3,558.4 
Lease Financing, net   11.4 
Non-U.S.1,250.2 609.0 641.2 1,345.7 
Other106.1 106.1  288.2 
Total Commercial23,441.9 7,906.1 15,535.8 15,262.0 
Personal
Residential Real Estate676.1 91.2 584.9 6,035.7 
Private Client4,248.9 3,014.0 1,234.9 11,815.1 
Non-U.S.571.6 249.2 322.4 597.9 
Other   49.0 
Total Personal5,496.6 3,354.4 2,142.2 18,497.7 
Total$28,938.5 $11,260.5 $17,678.0 $33,759.7 
(1) Commercial and Institutional industry sector information is presented on the basis of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
As part of Northern Trust’s credit processes, the Credit Risk Management function oversees a range of portfolio reviews that focus on significant and/or weaker-rated credits. This approach allows management to take remedial action in an effort to deal with potential problems. An integral part of the Credit Risk Management function is a formal review of past due and potential problem loans to determine which credits, if any, need to be placed on nonaccrual status or charged off. Northern Trust maintains a loan portfolio watch list for adversely classified credit exposures that includes all nonaccrual credits as well as other loans with elevated risk of default. Independent from the Credit Risk Management function, Credit Review undertakes both on-site and off-site file reviews that evaluate effectiveness of management’s implementation of the Credit Risk Management’s requirements.

Counterparty Credit Risk
Counterparty credit risk for Northern Trust primarily arises from a variety of funding, treasury, trading and custody-related activities, including over-the-counter (OTC) currency and interest rate derivatives, and from indemnified securities lending transactions. Credit exposure to counterparties is managed by use of a framework for setting limits by product type and exposure tenor.
To calculate exposure, Northern Trust treats repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and indemnified securities lending transactions as repo-style transactions. Foreign exchange exposures and interest rate derivatives are treated as OTC derivatives. The exposure at default measurement methodology for each eligible type of counterparty credit exposure, including the use of netting and collateral as risk mitigants, is determined based on operational requirements, the characteristics of the contract type and the portfolio size and complexity.

Credit Risk Mitigation
Northern Trust considers cash flow to be the primary source of repayment for client-related credit exposures. However, Northern Trust employs several different types of credit risk mitigants to manage its overall credit risk in the event cash flow is not sufficient to repay a credit exposure. Northern Trust broadly groups its risk mitigation techniques into the following three primary categories.



72 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Physical and Financial Collateral: Northern Trust’s primary risk mitigation approaches include the requirement of collateral. Residential and commercial real estate exposures are typically secured by properly margined mortgages on the property. In cases where loans to commercial or certain Wealth Management clients are secured by marketable securities, the daily values of the securities are monitored closely to ensure adherence to collateral coverage policies.

Netting: On-balance sheet netting is employed where applicable for counterparties with master netting agreements. Netting is primarily related to foreign exchange transactions with major banks and institutional clients subject to eligible master netting agreements. Northern Trust has elected to take the credit risk mitigation capital benefit of netting within its regulatory capital calculation at this time.

Guarantees: Personal and corporate guarantees are often taken to facilitate potential collection efforts and to protect Northern Trust’s claims relative to other creditors. Northern Trust has elected not to take the credit risk mitigation capital benefit of guarantors within its regulatory capital calculation at this time.

Another important risk management practice is the avoidance of undue concentrations of exposure, such as in any single (or small number of related) obligor/counterparty, loan type, industry, geography, country or risk mitigant. Processes are in place to establish limits on certain concentrations and the monitoring of adherence to the limits.

Operational Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, human factors and systems, or from external events.

Operational Risk Overview
Operational risk is inherent in each of Northern Trust’s businesses and corporate functions and reflects the potential for inadequate information systems, operating problems, product design and delivery difficulties, potential legal actions, or other catastrophes to result in losses. This includes the potential that continuity of service and resiliency may be impacted.

Operational risk includes compliance, fiduciary and legal risks, which under the Corporation’s common equity Tier 1risk structure are governed and managed explicitly.

Operational Risk Framework and Governance
To monitor and control operational risk, Northern Trust maintains a framework consisting of risk management policies, programs and practices designed to promote a sound operational environment and maintain the Corporation’s operational risk profile and losses within approved risk appetites and guidelines. The framework is deployed consistently and globally across all businesses and its objective is to identify and measure the factors that influence risk and drive action to reduce future loss events. The Operational Risk Management function is responsible for defining the operational risk framework and providing independent oversight of the framework across Northern Trust. It is the responsibility of each business to implement the enterprise-wide operational risk framework and business-specific risk management programs to identify, monitor, measure, manage and report on operational risk and mitigate Northern Trust’s exposure to loss. Several key programs support the operational risk framework, including:
Loss Event Data Program - a program that collects internal and external loss data for use in monitoring operational risk exposure, various business analyses and a Basel Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) capital ratioquantification.
Risk and Control Self-Assessment - a comprehensive, structured risk management process used by Northern Trust’s businesses to identify, measure, monitor and mitigate operational risk exposures throughout the enterprise.
Operational Risk Scenario Analysis - a systematic process of obtaining expert opinions from business managers and risk management experts to derive reasoned assessments of the likelihood of occurrence and the potential loss impact of plausible operational losses.
Product and Process Risk Management Program - a program used for evaluating and managing risks associated with the introduction of new and modified noncredit products and services, significant changes to operating processes, and related significant loss events.
Outsourcing Risk Management Program - a program that provides processes for appropriate risk assessment, measurement, monitoring and management of outsourced technology and business process outsourcing.
Information Security and Technology Risk Management - a program that communicates and implements risk management processes and controls to address information security, including cyber threats, technology and compliance risks to the organization.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 73

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operational Resiliency and Recovery Management Program - a program designed to protect life safety, minimize business impact and support the resumption of mission-critical and economic functions for clients following an incident.
Physical Security - a program that provides for the safety of Northern Trust partners, clients, and visitors worldwide.
Insurance Management Program - a program designed to reduce the monetary impact of certain operational loss events.

As discussed in Risk Control, Model Risk Management also is part of the operational risk framework.

The ORC is responsible for overseeing the activities of Northern Trust related to the management of operational risk including establishing and maintaining the Corporate Operational Risk Policy and approving the operational risk framework and programs. This committee has the expanded role of coordinating operational risk issues related to compliance and fiduciary risks. The purpose of this committee is to provide executive management’s insight and guidance to the management of existing and emerging operational risks. This includes identification and assessment of evolving risk trends across the operational risk framework and how these can be best managed.

Operational Risk Measurement
Northern Trust utilizes the AMA capital quantification process to estimate required capital for the Corporation and applicable U.S. banking subsidiaries. Northern Trust’s AMA capital quantification process incorporates outputs from the Loss Event Data, Risk and Control Self-Assessment and Operational Risk Scenario Analysis programs to derive required capital. Business environment factor information is used to estimate loss frequency. The AMA capital quantification process uses a Loss Distribution Approach methodology to combine frequency and severity distributions to arrive at an estimate of the potential aggregate loss at the 99.9th percentile of the aggregate loss distribution over a one-year time horizon.

Information Security and Technology Risk Management
Effective management of risks related to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information is crucial in an environment of increasing cyber threat and requires a structured approach to establish and communicate expectations and required practices. Northern Trust’s information security and technology risk management framework includes a comprehensive governance structure and an Information Security and Technology Risk Management Policy and Program approved by the Business Risk Committee. The framework is supported by an organizational structure that reflects support from executive management and includes risk committees comprised of members from across the businesses, including the Information Security and Technology Risk Committee (ISTRC). The ISTRC is chaired by the Chief Information Risk Officer, who regularly reports to the Business Risk Committee on the status of the Information Security and Technology Risk Management Program.
The governance process, internal controls and risk management practices are designed to keep risk at levels appropriate to Northern Trust’s overall risk appetite and the inherent risk in the markets in which Northern Trust operates. Northern Trust employees are responsible for promoting information security as calculatedwell as adhering to applicable policies and standards and other means provided to them to safeguard electronic information and business systems within their care. Training and awareness programs to educate employees on information security are ongoing and include multiple approaches such as mandatory computer-based training, phishing simulations, and the designation of individuals as Information Security and Privacy Champions within the businesses. In cases where Northern Trust relies on vendors to perform services, controls are routinely reviewed for alignment with industry standards and their ability to protect information. Any findings identified are remediated following a risk-based approach.
In addition to the various information security controls managed and monitored within the organization, Northern Trust uses external third-party security teams on a regular basis to assess effectiveness. These teams perform security program maturity assessments, penetration tests, security assessments and reviews of Northern Trust’s susceptibility to cyber-attacks. Northern Trust operates a global security operations center for threat identification and response. This center aggregates security threat information from systems and platforms across the businesses, and alerts the organization in accordance with its documented Cyber Incident Response Plan.
The Cyber Incident Response Plan is used to respond to cybersecurity incidents. A cybersecurity incident is defined as an incident caused by damaging activity, which requires actions to prevent and respond to disruptions, denials, compromises or exfiltration that impact the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the assets of Northern Trust or its clients. The plan provides a streamlined approach that can be invoked rapidly to address matters that raise enterprise concern and to communicate impact, actions and status to senior management, including the Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Information Risk Officer, and appropriate stakeholders. The plan is designed to work with enterprise-level response plans, and is reviewed, tested, and updated regularly.



74 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Northern Trust’s disclosure procedures and controls also address cybersecurity incidents and include elements to ensure that there is an analysis of potential disclosure obligations arising from any such incidents. Northern Trust also maintains compliance programs to address the applicability of restrictions on securities trading while in possession of material, nonpublic information, including in instances in which such information may relate to cybersecurity incidents.

Operational Resiliency and Recovery Management
Northern Trust’s operational resiliency approach encompasses operational resiliency and recovery processes enterprise-wide (including staff, technology and facilities) to ensure that following a disaster or business interruption Northern Trust resumes mission-critical business and economic functions and fulfills all regulatory and legal requirements.
Northern Trust’s operational resiliency mitigation and preventative measures include sophisticated physical security, resilient designs and peer capacity for its corporate data centers, a highly redundant global network, robust network security, resiliency centers that offer alternative workstations, transfer of work and work-from-home programs that provide further capability.
All of Northern Trust’s businesses are required to risk-assess their critical functions regularly and develop business continuity plans covering resource requirements (people, systems, vendor relationships and other assets), arrangements for obtaining these resources and prioritizing the resumption of each function in compliance with corporate standards. The strength of the business continuity programs of all critical third-party vendors to Northern Trust are reviewed on a regular basis. All of Northern Trust’s businesses test their plans at least annually. The ORC annually reviews and presents the corporate business continuity plan to the Business Risk Committee. In 2020, Northern Trust utilized these business continuity plans to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Northern Trust has also begun exploring the integration of climate-related scenario analyses into its broader risk management program to help align with certain recommendations of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). In the context of operational risk, the main focus of these climate-related scenario analyses is on operational resiliency and recovery. Conducting such scenario analyses and assessing the magnitude of climate-related financial and non-financial risks and opportunities related to Northern Trust’s global assets is intended to position the organization to navigate uncertain climate futures more effectively.

Fiduciary Risk
Fiduciary risks are risks arising from the failure in administering or managing financial and other assets in clients’ fiduciary accounts: i) to adhere to a fiduciary standard of care if required under the advanced approaches methodologies wouldterms of governing documents or applicable laws; or ii) to properly discharge fiduciary duties. Fiduciary status may hinge on the nature of a particular function being performed and fiduciary standards may vary by jurisdiction, type of relationship and governing document.

Fiduciary Risk Overview
The fiduciary risk management framework identifies, assesses, measures, monitors and reports on fiduciary risk matters deemed significant. Fiduciary risk is mitigated through internal controls and risk management practices that are designed to identify, understand and keep such risk at levels consistent with the organization’s overall risk appetite while also managing the inherent risk in each relationship for which Northern Trust serves in a fiduciary capacity. Each business is responsible for complying with all corporate policies and external regulations and for establishing specific procedures, standards and guidelines to manage fiduciary risk within the desired risk appetite.
Fiduciary Risk Framework and Governance
The FRC is responsible for overseeing activities related to the exercise of fiduciary powers throughout the organization and for establishing and reviewing the fiduciary risk policies and the fiduciary risk framework that supports the coordination of activities to identify, monitor, manage and report on fiduciary risk. In addition, the FRC serves as an escalation point for significant issues raised by its subcommittees or elsewhere in the organization.
Compliance Risk
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, financial loss, or damage to reputation resulting from failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, other regulatory requirements, or codes of conduct and other standards of self-regulatory organizations applicable to Northern Trust. Compliance risk includes the following two subcategories:
Regulatory Risk - risk arising from failure to comply with prudential and conduct of business or other regulatory requirements.
Financial Crime Risk - risk arising from financial crime (e.g., money laundering, sanctions violations, fraud, insider dealing, theft, etc.) in relation to the products, services, or accounts of the institution, its clients, or others associated with the same.

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 75

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Compliance Risk Framework and Governance
The compliance risk management framework identifies, assesses, controls, measures, monitors and reports on compliance risk. The framework is designed to minimize compliance risk and maintain an environment in which criminal or regulatory violations do not occur. The framework includes a comprehensive governance structure and a Compliance and Ethics Program approved by the Business Risk Committee.
Each business is responsible for the implementation and effectiveness of the Compliance and Ethics Program and specific compliance policies within their respective businesses. Each business is responsible for its respective employees’ compliance with corporate policies and external regulations and for establishing specific procedures, standards and guidelines to manage compliance risk in accordance with Northern Trust’s Compliance and Ethics Program.
The CEOC establishes and monitors adherence to Northern Trust’s Compliance and Ethics Program. The Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer reports to the Business Risk Committee, as appropriate, and chairs the CEOC.

Liquidity Risk Management

Liquidity Risk Overview
Liquidity risk is the risk of not being able to raise sufficient funds or maintain collateral to meet balance sheet and contingent liability cash flow obligations when due, because of firm-specific or market-wide stress events.
Northern Trust maintains a strong liquidity position and liquidity risk profile. Northern Trust’s balance sheet is primarily liability-driven. That is, the main driver of balance sheet changes comes from changing levels of client deposits, which are generally related to the level of custody assets serviced and commercial and personal deposits and can also be influenced by market conditions. This liability-driven business model differs from a typical asset-driven business model, where increased levels of deposits and wholesale borrowings are required to support, for example, increased levels of lending. Northern Trust’s balance sheet is generally comprised of high-quality assets that are managed to meet anticipated obligations under stress, resulting in low liquidity risk. Current elevated levels of client deposits driven by market conditions are actively managed and monitored.

Liquidity Risk Framework and Governance
Northern Trust maintains a liquidity risk framework consisting of risk management policies and practices to keep its risk profile within the Board-approved Corporate Risk Appetite Statement. All liquidity risk activities are overseen by the Risk Management function, which is independent of the businesses undertaking the activities.
The Liquidity Management Policy and exposure limits for liquidity risk are set by the Board, and committee structures have been 13.7%established to implement and monitor adherence to corporate policies, external regulations and established procedures. Limits are monitored based on measures such as the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and the liquidity stress-testing buffer across a fully phased-in basis, whilerange of time horizons. Treasury, in the Corporation’s common equity Tier 1 capital ratio underfirst line of defense, proposes liquidity risk management strategies and is responsible for performing liquidity management activities.The Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) provides first line management oversight and is responsible for approving strategies and activities within the standardized approach would have been 12.9% onrisk appetite, monitoring risk metrics, overseeing balance sheet resources, and reviewing reporting such as cash flows, LCR, and stress test results.
The Market and Liquidity Risk Management Committee (MLRC), in the second line of defense, provides challenge to the first line activities, evaluates compliance with regulatory requirements and process effectiveness, and escalates material items for corrective action. The MLRC provides second line oversight and is responsible for reviewing market and liquidity risk exposures, approving and monitoring risk metrics, and approving key methodologies and assumptions that drive liquidity risk measurement.

Liquidity Risk Analysis, Monitoring, and Reporting
Liquidity risk is analyzed and monitored in order to ensure compliance with the approved risk appetite. Various liquidity analysis and monitoring activities are employed by Northern Trust to understand better the nature and sources of its liquidity risks, including: liquidity stress testing, liquidity metric monitoring, collateral management, intraday management, cash flow projections, operational deposit modeling, liquid asset buffer measurement, funds transfer pricing, and contingency funding planning.
The liquidity risk management process is supported through management and regulatory reporting. Both Northern Trust’s Treasury and Market and Liquidity Risk Management functions produce management reports that enable oversight bodies to make informed decisions and support management of liquidity risk within the approved risk appetite. Holistic liquidity metrics such as LCR and internal liquidity stress testing are actively monitored, along with a fully phased-in basis.suite of other metrics that provide early warning indicators of changes in the risk profile.




76 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management Overview
Northern Trust employs an integrated risk management framework to support its business decisions and the execution of its corporate strategies. The framework provides a methodology to identify, assess, monitor, measure, manage and reportgovern both internal and external risks to Northern Trust, and promotes a culture of risk awareness and good conduct across the organization. Northern Trust’s risk culture encompasses the general awareness, attitude and conduct of employees with respect to risk and the management of risk across all lines of defense within the organization. Northern Trust cultivates a culture of effective risk management by defining and embedding risk management accountabilities in all employee performance expectations and provides training, development and performance rewards to reinforce this culture.
Northern Trust’s risk management framework contains three inter-related elements, designed to support consistent enterprise risk identification, management and reporting: a comprehensive risk inventory, a static taxonomy of risk categories and a dynamic taxonomy of risk themes. The risk inventory is a detailed register of the risks inherently faced by Northern Trust, supporting the consistent identification and classification of risks across the organization.Trust. The risk categories and risk themes are classification systems used for classifying and managing the risk inventory and enabling different risk profile views. All identified risks inherent in Northern Trust’s business activities are cataloged into the following risk categories: credit, operational, fiduciary, compliance, market, liquidity, and strategic risk. All material risks are also dynamically cataloged into various risk themes which are defined groupings that share common characteristics, focus on business outcomes and span across risk categories.
Northern Trust implements its risk management framework through a “three lines of defense” operating model, embedding a robust risk management capability within its businesses. The model, used to communicate risk management expectations across the organization, contains three roles, each with a complimentarycomplementary level of risk management accountability. Within this operating model, Northern Trust’s businesses are the first line of defense for protecting it against the risks inherent in its businesses and are supported by dedicated business risk management teams. The Risk Management function, the second line of defense, sets the direction for Northern Trust’s risk management activities and provides aggregate risk oversight and reporting in support of risk governance. Audit Services, the third line of defense, provides independent assurance as to the effectiveness of the integrated risk framework.


Risk Governance and Oversight Overview
Risk governance is an integral aspect of corporate governance at Northern Trust, and includes clearly defined accountabilities, expectations, internal controls and processes for risk-based decision-making and escalation of issues. The following diagram below provides a high-level overview of Northern Trust’s risk governance structure, highlighting oversight by the Board of Directors and key risk-related committees.


TABLE 41:46: RISK GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Northern Trust Corporation Board of Directors
Audit
Committee
Business Risk
Committee
Capital Governance
Committee
 Compensation and Benefits Committee

Northern Trust Corporation Board of Directors
Audit CommitteeBusiness Risk CommitteeCapital Governance CommitteeCompensation and Benefits Committee
-Cybersecurity Risk Oversight Subcommittee
Global Enterprise Risk Committee (GERC)
Credit Risk
Committee
Operational Risk
Committee
Fiduciary Risk
Committee
Compliance & Ethics
Oversight Committee
Market & Liquidity Risk CommitteeModel Risk Oversight Committee





68 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Board of Directors provides oversight of risk management directly and through certain of its committees: the Audit Committee, the Business Risk Committee, the Capital Governance Committee and the Compensation and Benefits Committee. The Board of Directors approves Northern Trust’s risk management frameworkRisk Management Framework and Corporate Risk Appetite Statement. The Business Risk Committee assumes primary responsibility and oversight with respect to credit risk, operational risk, fiduciary risk, compliance risk, market risk, liquidity risk, strategic risk, and strategic risk.associated risk themes. The Cybersecurity Risk Oversight Subcommittee of the Business Risk Committee assists the Business Risk Committee in discharging its duties with respect to risks related to cybersecurity inherent in Northern Trust’s businesses. The Audit Committee provides oversight with respect to financial reporting and legal risk, while the Compensation and Benefits Committee oversees the development and operation of Northern Trust’s incentive compensation program. The Compensation and Benefits Committee annually reviews management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the design and performance of

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 75

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Northern Trust’s incentive compensation arrangements and practices in providing incentives that are consistent with Northern Trust’s safety, soundness, and culture. This assessment includes an evaluation of whether Northern Trust’s incentive compensation arrangements and practices discourage inappropriate risk-taking behavior by participants. The Capital Governance Committee of the Board assists the Board in discharging its oversight duties with respect to capital management and resolution planning activities. Among other responsibilities, the Capital Governance Committee oversees Northern Trust’s capital adequacy assessments, forecasting, and stress testing processes and activities, including the annual CCAR exercise, and challenges management, as appropriate, on various elements of such processes and activities. Accordingly, the Capital Governance Committee provides oversight with respect to Northern Trust’s linkage of material risks to the capital adequacy assessment process.


The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) oversees Northern Trust’s management of risk and compliance, promotes risk awareness and fosters a proactive risk management environment wherein risks inherent in the business strategy are identified, understood, appropriately monitored and mitigated. The CRO reports directly to the Business Risk Committee and the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer. The CRO regularly advises the Business Risk Committee and reports to the Committee at least quarterly on risk exposures, risk management deficiencies and emerging risks. In accordance with the risk management framework, the CRO and the Risk Management executive risk managementleadership team of Northern Trust, together with the Chief Financial Officer, Head of Capital and Resolution Planning, General Counsel and Chief Audit Executive, meetsmeet as the Global Enterprise Risk Committee (GERC) to provide executive management oversight and guidance with respect to the management of the categories of risk and risk themes within Northern Trust. Among other risk management responsibilities, GERC receives reports, escalations, or recommendations from senior risk committees that are responsible for the management of risk, and from time to time may delegate responsibility to such committees for risk issues. Senior risk committees include:


The Credit Risk Committee (CRC) establishes and monitors credit-related policies and practices throughout Northern Trust and promotes their uniform application.


The Operational Risk Committee (ORC) provides independent oversight and is responsible for setting the Corporate Operational Risk Management Policyoperational risk-related policies and developing and implementing the operational risk management framework and programs that support the coordination of operational risk activities.


The Fiduciary Risk Committee (FRC) is responsible for establishing and reviewing the fiduciary risk policies and establishing the fiduciary risk framework, governance and programs that support the coordination of fiduciary risk activities.


The Compliance & Ethics Oversight Committee (CEOC) provides oversight and direction with respect to compliance policies, implementation of the compliance and ethics program, and the coordination of regulatory compliance initiatives across the Corporation.


The Market & Liquidity Risk Committee (MLRC) oversees activities relating to the management of market and liquidity risks by facilitating a focused review of market and liquidity risk exposures and providing rigorous challenge of related policies, key assumptions, and practices.


The Model Risk Oversight Committee (MROC) is responsible for providing management attention, direction, and oversight of the model risk management framework and model risk within Northern Trust.


In addition to the aforementioned committees, Northern Trust deploysestablishes business and regional risk committees that also report into GERC.

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 69

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Risk Assessment, Appetite and Reporting Processes
As part of the integrated risk framework, Northern Trust has established key risk identification and risk management processes, embedded within its businesses to enable a risk-informed profile that supports its business decisions and the execution of its corporate strategies. Northern Trust’s risk assessment process consists of a series of programs across the first and second lines of defense that identify, measure, manage and report risks in line with risk appetite and guidelines.
Northern Trust defines its risk appetite as the amountaggregate level and types of risk that it isthe Board of Directors and senior management are willing to assume in its exposuresto achieve the Corporation’s strategic objectives and business activities to achieve its strategicplan, consistent with prudent management of risk and financial objectives and remain in compliance with applicable capital, liquidity, and other regulatory requirements. It includes consideration of the likelihood and impact of risks, using both

76   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


monetary loss and non-financial measures across risk themes to monitor against tolerance thresholdthresholds and guideline levels that trigger escalation to risk committees, senior management.management, and the Board of Directors or committees thereof, as appropriate.


Risk Control
Risk Control is an internal, independent review function within the Risk Management function. Risk Control is managed by the Head of Risk Control and is comprised of Model Risk Management, Credit Review, Global Compliance Testing and Basel Independent Verification groups, each with its own risk focus and oversight. Model Risk Management is responsible for the implementation and management of the enterprise-wide model risk framework and independently validating new models and reviewing and re-validating existing models. Credit Review provides an independent, ongoing assessment of credit exposure and related credit risk management processes across Northern Trust. Global Compliance Testing evaluates the effectiveness of procedures and controls designed to comply with relevant laws and regulations, as well as corresponding Northern Trust policies governing regulatory compliance activities. Lastly, Basel Independent Verification promotes rigor and accuracy in Northern Trust’s ongoing compliance with Basel III requirements and adherence to Enhanced Prudential Standards, including Liquidity Stress Testing.liquidity stress testing. The Business Risk Committee overseeshas oversight responsibility with respect to Risk Control generally as well as each of these groups.


Audit Services
Audit Services is an independent control function that assesses and validates controls within Northern Trust’s risk management framework. Audit Services is managed by the Chief Audit Executive with oversight from the Audit Committee. Audit Services tests the overall adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal controls associated with the advanced systemsframework on an ongoing basis and reports the results of these audits directly to the Audit Committee. Audit Services includes professionals with a broad range of audit and industry experience, including risk management expertise. The Chief Audit Executive reports directly to the Audit Committee and the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer.Officer and is a non-voting member of GERC.


Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk to interest income or principal from the failure of a borrower, issuer, or counterparty to perform on an obligation.


Credit Risk Overview
Credit risk is inherent in many of Northern Trust’s activities. A significant component of credit risk relates to loans, leases, securities, and counterparty-related exposures. Northern Trust’s loan portfolio differs significantly from those of other large U.S. financial institutions in that Northern Trust is generally:
not an originator of loan products to be sold into a secondary market or to be bundled into asset securitizations;
not an agent bank or syndicator of loans, where risk management is achieved post-close through the sale of participations; and
not a participant in leveraged financial transactions, such as project finance, private-equity-originated acquisition financing or hedge fund leveraging.


Credit Risk Framework and Governance
The Credit Risk Management function is the focal point of the credit risk framework and, while independent of the businesses, it works closely with them to achieve the goal of assuring proactive management of credit risk. To monitor and control credit risk, the Credit Risk Management function maintains a framework that consists of policies, standards, and programs designed to promote a prudent relationship-based credit culture. This function also monitors adherence to corporate policies, standards, programs, and external regulations.
The Credit Risk Management function provides a system of checks and balances for Northern Trust’s diverse credit-related activities by monitoring these activities and practices and promoting their uniform application throughout Northern Trust.



70 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The credit risk framework provides authorities for approval of the extension of credit. Individual credit authority for commercial and personal loans is limited to specified amounts and maturities. Credit requests exceeding individual authority because of amount, rating, term or other conditions, are referred to the relevant Group Credit Approval Committee. Credit decisions involving exposure in excess of these limits require the approval of the Senior Credit Committee. The Capital Markets Credit Committee has sole credit authority for the approval, modification, or renewal of credit exposure to all wholesale market counterparties.
The CRCCredit Risk Committee establishes and monitors credit-related policies and programs throughout Northern Trust and promotes their uniform application. The Chief Credit Officer reports directly to the CRO and chairs the CRC. Independent oversight and review of the credit risk framework also is provided by Risk Control.


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 77

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



Credit Risk Measurement
An integral component of credit risk measurement is Northern Trust’s internal risk rating system. Northern Trust’s internal risk rating system enables identification, measurement, approval and monitoring of credit risk. Calculations include entity-specific information about the obligor’s or counterparty’s probability of default and exposure-specific information about loss given default, exposure at default and maturity.
The Credit Risk Management function is responsible for the ongoing oversight of each model that supports the internal risk-rating system. Independent model governance and oversight is further supported by the activities of Risk Control.


Loans and Other Extensions of Credit
A significant component of credit risk relates to the loan portfolio, including contractual obligations such as legally binding commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These contractual obligations and arrangements are discussed in the “Off-Balance-Sheet“Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” section and in Note 28, “Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments,26, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Undrawn commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since a significant portion of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future loans or liquidity requirements. The following table provides information about the industry sector and expiration dates of undrawn commitments to extend credit as of December 31, 2020.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 71

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE 47: UNDRAWN COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020COMMITMENT EXPIRATION
($ In Millions)TOTAL
COMMITMENTS
ONE YEAR
AND LESS
OVER ONE
YEAR
OUTSTANDING
LOANS
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional
Finance and Insurance$4,435.8 $2,454.1 $1,981.7 $3,085.0 
Holding Companies   28.8 
Manufacturing6,945.6 1,061.3 5,884.3 1,422.8 
Mining785.6 259.5 526.1 5.2 
Public Administration98.4 98.4  24.1 
Retail Trade903.1 350.5 552.6 164.0 
Services6,150.7 2,626.4 3,524.3 4,329.0 
Transportation and Warehousing283.1 0.2 282.9 214.2 
Utilities1,286.2 38.3 1,247.9 7.2 
Wholesale Trade749.6 108.4 641.2 427.3 
Other Commercial195.2 100.9 94.3 350.7 
Commercial and Institutional(1)
21,833.3 7,098.0 14,735.3 10,058.3 
Commercial Real Estate252.3 93.0 159.3 3,558.4 
Lease Financing, net   11.4 
Non-U.S.1,250.2 609.0 641.2 1,345.7 
Other106.1 106.1  288.2 
Total Commercial23,441.9 7,906.1 15,535.8 15,262.0 
Personal
Residential Real Estate676.1 91.2 584.9 6,035.7 
Private Client4,248.9 3,014.0 1,234.9 11,815.1 
Non-U.S.571.6 249.2 322.4 597.9 
Other   49.0 
Total Personal5,496.6 3,354.4 2,142.2 18,497.7 
Total$28,938.5 $11,260.5 $17,678.0 $33,759.7 
(1) Commercial and Institutional industry sector information is presented on the basis of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
As part of Northern Trust’s credit processes, the Credit Risk Management function oversees a range of portfolio reviews that focus on significant and/or weaker-rated credits. This approach allows management to take remedial action in an effort to deal with potential problems. An integral part of the Credit Risk Management function is a formal review of past due and potential problem loans to determine which credits, if any, need to be placed on nonperformingnonaccrual status or charged off. Northern Trust maintains a loan portfolio watch list for adversely classified credit exposures that includes all nonperformingnonaccrual credits as well as other loans with elevated risk of default. Independent from the Credit Risk Management function, Credit Review undertakes both on-site and off-site file reviews that evaluate effectiveness of management’s implementation of the Credit Risk Management’s requirements.


Counterparty Credit Risk
Counterparty credit risk for Northern Trust primarily arises from a variety of funding, treasury, trading and custody-related activities, including over-the-counter (OTC) currency and interest rate derivatives, and from indemnified securities lending transactions. Credit exposure to counterparties is managed by use of a framework for setting limits by product type and exposure tenor.
To calculate exposure, Northern Trust treats repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and indemnified securities lending transactions as repo-style transactions. Foreign exchange exposures and interest rate derivatives are treated as OTC derivatives. The exposure at default measurement methodology for each eligible type of counterparty credit exposure, including the use of netting and collateral as risk mitigants, is determined based on operational requirements, the characteristics of the contract type and the portfolio size and complexity.


Credit Risk Mitigation
Northern Trust considers cash flow to be the primary source of repayment for client-related credit exposures. However, Northern Trust employs several different types of credit risk mitigants to manage its overall credit risk in the event cash flow is not sufficient to repay a credit exposure. Northern Trust broadly groups its risk mitigation techniques into the following three primary categories.




72 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Physical and Financial Collateral: Northern Trust’s primary risk mitigation approaches include the requirement of collateral. Residential and commercial real estate exposures are typically secured by properly margined mortgages on the property. In cases where loans to commercial or certain Wealth Management clients are secured by marketable securities, the daily values of the securities are monitored closely to ensure adherence to collateral coverage policies.


Netting: On-balance-sheet On-balance sheet netting is employed on a limited basis.where applicable for counterparties with master netting agreements. Netting is primarily related to foreign exchange transactions with major banks and institutional clients subject to eligible master netting agreements. Northern Trust has elected to take the credit risk mitigation capital benefit of netting within its regulatory capital calculation at this time.


Guarantees: Personal and corporate guarantees are often taken to facilitate potential collection efforts and to protect Northern Trust’s claims relative to other creditors. Northern Trust has elected not to take the credit risk mitigation capital benefit of guarantors within its regulatory capital calculation at this time.


Another important risk management practice is the avoidance of undue concentrations of exposure, such as in any single (or small number of related) obligor/counterparty, loan type, industry, geography, country or risk mitigant. Processes are in place to establish limits on certain concentrations and the monitoring of adherence to the limits.


78   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



Operational Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, human factors and systems, or from external events.


Operational Risk Overview
Operational risk is inherent in each of Northern Trust’s businesses and corporate functions and reflects the potential for inadequate information systems, operating problems, product design and delivery difficulties, potential legal actions, or other catastrophes to result in losses. This includes the potential that continuity of service and resiliency may be impacted.


Operational risk includes compliance, fiduciary and legal risks, which under the Corporation’s risk structure are governed and managed explicitly.


Operational Risk Framework and Governance
To monitor and control operational risk, Northern Trust maintains a framework consisting of risk management policies, programs and practices designed to promote a sound operational environment and maintain the Corporation’s operational risk profile and losses within approved risk appetites and guidelines. The framework is deployed consistently and globally across all businesses and its objective is to identify and measure the factors that impactinfluence risk and drive action to reduce future loss events. The Operational Risk Management function is responsible for defining the operational risk framework and providing independent oversight of the framework across Northern Trust. It is the responsibility of each business to implement the enterprise-wide operational risk framework and business-specific risk management programs to identify, monitor, measure, manage and managereport on operational risk and mitigate Northern Trust’s exposure to loss. Several key programs support the operational risk framework, including:

Loss Event Data Program - a program that collects internal and external loss data for use in monitoring operational risk exposure, various business analyses and a Basel Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) capital quantification.
Risk and Control Self-Assessment - a comprehensive, structured risk management process used by Northern Trust’s businesses to analyzeidentify, measure, monitor and mitigate operational risk exposures throughout the risks that are present in their respective business environments, processes and activities and to assess the adequacy of associated internal controls.
enterprise.
Operational Risk Scenario Analysis - a systematic process of obtaining expert opinions from business managers and risk management experts to derive reasoned assessments of the likelihood of occurrence and the potential loss impact of plausible high-severity operational losses.
Product and Process Risk Management Program - a program used for evaluating and managing risks associated with the introduction of new and modified noncredit products and services, significant changes to operating processes, and related significant loss events.
Outsourcing Risk Management Program - a program that provides processes for appropriate risk assessment, measurement, monitoring and management of outsourced technology and business process outsourcing.
Information Security and Technology Risk Management - a program that communicates and implements compliance and risk management processes and controls to address information security, including cyber threats, technology and technologycompliance risks to the organization.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 73

Business Continuity
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operational Resiliency and Disaster Recovery Management Program - a program designed to protect life safety, minimize business impact and support the resumption of mission criticalmission-critical and economic functions for clients following an incident.
Physical Security - a program that provides for the safety of Northern Trust partners, clients, and visitors worldwide.
Insurance Management Program - a program designed to reduce the monetary impact of certain operational loss events.


As discussed in Risk Control, Model Risk Management also is part of the operational risk framework.


The ORC is responsible for overseeing the activities of Northern Trust related to the management of operational risk including establishing and maintaining the Corporate Operational Risk Policy and approving the operational risk framework and programs. This committee has the expanded role of coordinating operational risk issues related to compliance and fiduciary risks. The purpose of this committee is to provide executive management’s insight and guidance to the management of existing and emerging operational risks. This includes identification and assessment of evolving risk trends across the operational risk framework and how these can be best managed.


Operational Risk Measurement
Northern Trust utilizes the AMA capital quantification process to estimate required capital for the Corporation and applicable U.S. banking subsidiaries. Northern Trust’s AMA capital quantification process incorporates outputs from the Loss Event Data, Risk and Control Self-Assessment and Operational Risk Scenario Analysis programs to derive required

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 79

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


capital. Business environment factor information is used to estimate loss frequency. The AMA capital quantification process uses a Loss Distribution Approach methodology to combine frequency and severity distributions to arrive at an estimate of the potential aggregate loss at the 99.9th percentile of the aggregate loss distribution over a one-year time horizon.


Information Security and Technology Risk Management
Effective management of risks related to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information is crucial in an environment of increasing cyber threat and requires a structured approach to establish and communicate expectations and required practices. Northern Trust’s information security and technology risk management framework includes a comprehensive governance structure and an Information Security and Technology Risk Management Policy and Program approved by the Business Risk Committee. The framework is supported by an organizational structure that reflects support from executive management and includes risk committees comprised of members from across the businesses, including the Information Security and Technology Risk Committee (ISTRC). The ISTRC is chaired by the Chief Information SecurityRisk Officer, who regularly reports to the Business Risk Committee on the status of the Information Security and Technology Risk Management Program.
In addition to a strongThe governance process, internal controls and risk management practices are designed to keep risk at levels appropriate to Northern Trust’s overall risk appetite and the inherent risk in the markets in which Northern Trust operates. Northern Trust employees are responsible for promoting information security as well as adhering to applicable policies and standards and other means provided to them to safeguard electronic information and business systems within their care. Training and awareness programs to educate employees on information security are ongoing and include multiple approaches such as mandatory computer-based training, phishing simulations, and the designation of individuals as Information Security and Privacy Champions within the businesses. In cases where Northern Trust relies on vendors to perform services, controls are routinely reviewed for alignment with industry standards and their ability to protect information. Any findings identified are remediated following a risk-based approach.
In addition to the various information security controls managed and monitored within the organization, Northern Trust uses external third-party security teams on a regular basis to assess effectiveness. These teams perform security program maturity assessments, penetration tests, security assessments and reviews of Northern Trust’s susceptibility to social engineering attacks such as spear phishing.cyber-attacks. Northern Trust operates a global security operations center for threat identification and response. This center aggregates security threat information from systems and platforms across the businesses, and alerts the organization in accordance with its documented Cyber Incident Response Plan.
The Cyber Incident Response Plan is used to respond to cybersecurity incidents. A cybersecurity incident is defined as an incident caused by damaging activity, which requires actions to prevent and respond to disruptions, denials, compromises or exfiltration that impact the confidentiality, integrity and availablyavailability of the assets of Northern Trust or its clients. The plan provides a streamlined approach that can be invoked rapidly to address matters that raise enterprise concern and to communicate impact, actions and status to senior management, including the Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Information Risk Officer, and appropriate stakeholders. The plan is designed to work with enterprise-level response plans, and is reviewed, tested, and updated regularly.



74 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Northern Trust'sTrust’s disclosure controlsprocedures and procedurescontrols also address cybersecurity incidents and include elements to ensure that there is an analysis of potential disclosure obligations arising from any such incidents. Northern Trust also maintains compliance programs to address the applicability of restrictions on securities trading while in possession of material, nonpublic information, including in instances in which such information may relate to cybersecurity incidents.


BusinessOperational Resiliency and ContinuityRecovery Management
Northern Trust’s businessoperational resiliency approach encompasses business continuityoperational resiliency and disaster recovery processes enterprise-wide (including staff, technology and facilities) to ensure that following a disaster or business interruption Northern Trust resumes mission-critical business and economic functions and fulfills all regulatory and legal requirements.
Northern Trust’s businessoperational resiliency mitigation and preventative measures include sophisticated physical security, resilient designs and peer capacity for its corporate data centers, a highly redundant global network, robust network security, resiliency centers that offer alternative workstations, and transfer of work and work-from-home programs that provide further capability.
All of Northern Trust’s businesses are required to risk-assess their critical functions regularly and develop business continuity plans covering resource requirements (people, systems, vendor relationships and other assets), arrangements for obtaining these resources and prioritizing the resumption of each function in compliance with corporate standards. The strength of the business continuity programs of all critical third-party vendors to Northern Trust are reviewed on a regular basis. All of Northern Trust’s businesses test their plans at least annually.
The ORC annually reviews and presents the corporate business continuity plan to the Business Risk Committee. In 2020, Northern Trust utilized these business continuity plans to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Northern Trust has also begun exploring the integration of climate-related scenario analyses into its broader risk management program to help align with certain recommendations of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). In the context of operational risk, the main focus of these climate-related scenario analyses is on operational resiliency and recovery. Conducting such scenario analyses and assessing the magnitude of climate-related financial and non-financial risks and opportunities related to Northern Trust’s global assets is intended to position the organization to navigate uncertain climate futures more effectively.
80   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



Fiduciary Risk
Fiduciary risks are risks arising from the failure in administering or managing financial and other assets in clients’ fiduciary accounts: i) to adhere to a fiduciary standard of care if required under the terms of governing documents or applicable laws; or ii) to properly discharge fiduciary duties. Fiduciary status may hinge on the nature of a particular function being performed and fiduciary standards may vary by jurisdiction, type of relationship and governing document.


Fiduciary Risk Overview
The fiduciary risk management framework identifies, assesses, measures, monitors and reports on fiduciary risk matters deemed significant. Fiduciary risk is mitigated through internal controls and risk management practices that are designed to identify, understand and keep such risk at levels consistent with the organization’s overall risk appetite while also managing the inherent risk in each relationship for which Northern Trust serves in a fiduciary capacity. Each business is responsible for complying with all corporate policies and external regulations and for establishing specific procedures, standards and guidelines to manage fiduciary risk within the desired risk appetite level. appetite.
 
Fiduciary Risk Framework and Governance
The FRC is responsible for overseeing activities related to the exercise of fiduciary powers throughout the organization and for establishing and reviewing the fiduciary risk policies and establishing the fiduciary risk framework governance and programs that supportsupports the coordination of fiduciary risk activities to identify, monitor, manage and report on fiduciary risk. In addition, the FRC serves as an escalation point for significant issues raised by its subcommittees or elsewhere in the organization.
 
Compliance Risk
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, financial loss, or damage to reputation resulting from failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, other regulatory requirements, or codes of conduct and other standards of self-regulatory organizations applicable to Northern Trust. Compliance risk includes the following two subcategories:
Regulatory Risk - risk arising from failure to comply with prudential and conduct of business or other regulatory requirements.
Financial Crime Risk - risk arising from financial crime (e.g., money laundering, sanctions violations, fraud, insider dealing, theft, etc.) in relation to the products, services, or accounts of the institution, its clients, or others associated with the same.


2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 75

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Compliance Risk Framework and Governance
The compliance risk management framework identifies, assesses, controls, measures, monitors and reports on compliance risk. The framework is designed to minimize compliance risk and maintain an environment in which criminal or regulatory violations do not occur. The framework includes a comprehensive governance structure and a Compliance and Ethics Program approved by the Business Risk Committee.
Each business is responsible for the implementation and effectiveness of the Compliance and Ethics Program and specific compliance policies within their respective businesses. Each business is responsible for its respective employees’ compliance with corporate policies and external regulations and for establishing specific procedures, standards and guidelines to manage compliance risk in accordance with Northern Trust’s Compliance and Ethics Program.
The CEOC establishes and monitors adherence to Northern Trust’s Compliance and Ethics Program. The Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer reports to the Business Risk Committee, as appropriate, and chairs the CEOC.


Liquidity Risk Management

Liquidity Risk Overview
Liquidity risk is the risk of not being able to raise sufficient funds or maintain collateral to meet balance sheet and contingent liability cash flow obligations when due, because of firm-specific or market-wide stress events.

Liquidity Risk Overview
Northern Trust maintains a strong liquidity position and conservative liquidity risk profile. Northern Trust’s balance sheet is primarily liability-driven. That is, the main driver of balance sheet changes comes from changing levels of client deposits, which are generally related to the level of custody assets serviced and commercial and personal deposits.deposits and can also be influenced by market conditions. This liability-driven business model differs from a typical asset-driven business model, where increased levels of deposits and wholesale borrowings are required to support, for example, increased levels of lending. Northern Trust’s balance sheet is generally comprised of high-quality assets that are managed to meet anticipated obligations under stress, resulting in low liquidity risk. Current elevated levels of client deposits driven by market conditions are actively managed and monitored.


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 81

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



Liquidity Risk Framework and Governance
Northern Trust maintains a liquidity risk framework consisting of risk management policies and practices to keep its risk profile within the Board-approved Corporate Risk Appetite Statement. All liquidity risk activities are overseen by the Risk Management function, which is independent of the businesses undertaking the activities.
ExposureThe Liquidity Management Policy and exposure limits for liquidity risk are set by the Board, and committee structures have been established to implement and monitor adherence to corporate policies, external regulations and established procedures. Limits are monitored based on measures such as the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and the liquidity stress-testing buffer across a range of time horizons.
Treasury, in the first line of defense, proposes liquidity risk management strategies and is responsible for performing liquidity management activities.The Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) provides first line management oversight and is responsible for approving strategies and activities within the risk appetite, monitoring risk metrics, overseeing balance sheet resources, and reviewing reporting such as cash flows, LCR, and stress test results.
The Market and Liquidity Risk Management Committee (MLRC), in the second line of defense, provides challenge to the first line activities, evaluates compliance with regulatory requirements and process effectiveness, and escalates material items for corrective action. The MLRC provides second line oversight and is responsible for reviewing market and liquidity risk exposures, establishingapproving and monitoring risk metrics, and approving key methodologies and assumptions that drive liquidity risk measurement.


Liquidity Risk Analysis, Monitoring, and Reporting
Liquidity risk is analyzed and monitored in order to ensure compliance with the approved risk appetite. Various liquidity analysis and monitoring activities are employed by Northern Trust to understand better the nature and sources of its liquidity risks, including: liquidity stress testing, liquidity metric monitoring, collateral management, intraday management, cash flow projections, operational deposit modeling, liquid asset buffer measurement, funds transfer pricing, and contingency funding planning.
The liquidity risk management process is supported through management and regulatory reporting. Both Northern Trust’s Treasury and Market and Liquidity Risk Management functions produce management reports that enable oversight bodies to make informed decisions and support management of liquidity risk within the approved risk appetite. Holistic liquidity metrics such as LCR and internal liquidity stress testing are actively monitored, along with a suite of other metrics that provide early warning indicators of changes in the risk profile.





76 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Regulatory Environment
Northern Trust actively follows regulatory developments and regularly evaluates its liquidity risk management framework against proposed rule-making and industry best practices in order to comply with applicable regulations and further enhance its liquidity policies. Please refer to “Supervision and Regulation—Liquidity Standards” in Item 1, “Business,” for a discussion of applicable liquidity standards.

Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
The LCR Final Rule requires covered banking organizations, which include the Corporation, to maintain an amount of high-quality liquid assets (HQLAs) equal to or greater than 100% of the banking organization’s total net cash outflows over a 30 calendar-day standardized supervisory liquid stress scenario. The requirements of the LCR Final Rule are intended to promote the short-term resilience of the liquidity risk profile of covered banking organizations, improve the banking industry’s ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and economic stress, and improve the measurement and management of liquidity risk. The Corporation and the Bank each satisfied the U.S. liquidity coverage ratio requirements during 2020.

Funding
Northern Trust maintains a very liquid balance sheet, with cash and due from banks, deposits with the Federal Reserve and other central banks, short-term money market assets and investment securities in aggregate representing 73% of total assets as of December 31, 2020. The market value of unencumbered securities at the Bank, which include those placed at the Federal Reserve discount window, totaled $56.8 billion at December 31, 2020.
As the Corporation’s principal subsidiary encompassing all of Northern Trust’s banking activities, the Bank centrally manages liquidity for all U.S. and international banking operations. Liquidity is provided by a variety of sources, including client deposits (institutional and personal) from the C&IS and Wealth Management businesses, wholesale funding from the capital markets, maturities of short-term investments, interest earned on investment securities and money market assets, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, and unencumbered liquid assets that can be sold or pledged to secure additional funds. While management does not view central bank discount windows as primary sources of liquidity, at December 31, 2020, the Bank had over $51.3 billion of securities and loans readily available as collateral to support discount window borrowings. The Bank also is active in the U.S. interbank funding market, providing an important source of additional liquidity and low-cost funds.
The liquidity of the Corporation is managed separately from that of the Bank. The primary sources of cash for the Corporation are issuances of debt or equity and dividend payments from the Bank. On May 1, 2020, the Corporation issued $1.0 billion of 1.95% senior notes, due May 1, 2030. The Corporation also received $900.0 million of dividends from the Bank in 2020. Dividends from the Bank are subject to certain restrictions, as discussed in further detail in Note 31, “Restrictions on Subsidiary Dividends and Loans or Advances,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The Corporation’s liquidity, defined as the amount of cash and highly marketable assets, was $2.5 billion and $2.6 billion at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. During, and at year-end, 2020 and 2019, these assets were comprised almost entirely of cash in a demand deposit account at the Bank or overnight money market placements, both of which were fully available to the Corporation to support its own cash flow requirements or those of its subsidiaries, as needed. Average liquidity during 2020 and 2019 was $2.7 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively. The cash flows of the Corporation are shown in Note 34, “Northern Trust Corporation (Corporation only),” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Uses of Liquidity
Liquidity supports a variety of activities, including client withdrawals, purchases of securities, net loan growth, and draws on commitments to extend credit.
The Corporation’s uses of cash consist mainly of dividend payments to the Corporation’s stockholders; the payment of principal and interest to note holders; repurchases of its common stock; and investments in, or loans to, its subsidiaries. The most significant uses of cash by the Corporation during 2020 were $584.6 million of common stock dividends and $299.8 million of common stock repurchases.

Credit Ratings
A significant source of liquidity for both the Corporation and the Bank is the ability to draw funding from capital markets globally. The credit ratings of the Corporation and the Bank as of December 31, 2020, provided in the following table, allow Northern Trust to access capital markets on favorable terms.

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 77

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE 48: NORTHERN TRUST CREDIT RATINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31,2020
CREDIT RATING
STANDARD &
POOR’S
MOODY’SFITCH RATINGS
Northern Trust Corporation:
Senior DebtA+A2A+
Subordinated DebtAA2A+
Preferred StockBBB+Baa1BBB
Trust Preferred Capital SecuritiesBBB+A3BBB+
OutlookStableStableStable
The Northern Trust Company:
Short-Term DepositA-1+P-1F1+
Long-Term Deposit/DebtAA-Aa2AA
Subordinated DebtA+A2A+
OutlookStableStableStable

A significant downgrade in one or more of these ratings could limit Northern Trust’s access to capital markets and/or increase the rates paid for short-term borrowings, including deposits, and future long-term debt issuances. The size of these rate increases would depend on multiple factors, including the extent of the downgrade, Northern Trust’s relative debt rating compared to other financial institutions, current market conditions, and other factors. In addition, as discussed in Note 28, “Offsetting of Assets and Liabilities,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” Northern Trust enters into certain master netting arrangements with derivative counterparties that contain credit-risk-related contingent features in which the counterparty has the option to declare Northern Trust in default and accelerate cash settlement of net derivative liabilities with the counterparty in the event Northern Trust’s credit rating falls below specified levels. At December 31, 2020, the net maximum amount of these termination payments that Northern Trust could have been required to pay was $604.2 million. Other than these credit-risk-related contingent derivative counterparty payments, Northern Trust had no long-term debt covenants or other credit-risk-related payments at December 31, 2020, that would be triggered by a significant downgrade in its debt ratings.

Contractual Obligations
The following table shows Northern Trust’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2020.

TABLE 49: CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31,2020
PAYMENT DUE BY PERIOD
($ In Millions)TOTALONE YEAR
AND LESS
1-3
YEARS
3-5 YEARSOVER 5
YEARS
Senior Notes(1)
$3,122.4 $499.8 $499.6 $ $2,123.0 
Subordinated Debt(1)
1,189.3   839.8 349.5 
Floating Rate Capital Debt(1)
277.8    277.8 
Operating Leases(2)
801.5 99.1 178.2 151.7 372.5 
Purchase Obligations(3)
710.3 213.9 360.8 128.8 6.8 
Total Contractual Obligations$6,101.3 $812.8 $1,038.6 $1,120.3 $3,129.6 
Note: Obligations as shown do not include deposit liabilities or interest requirements on funding sources.
(1) Refer to Note 13, “Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt,” and Note 14, “Floating Rate Capital Debt,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further details.
(2) Refer to Note 10, “Lease Commitments,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further details.
(3) Purchase obligations consist of enforceable and legally binding agreements to purchase products or services at specified significant terms.

Market Risk Management
There are two types of market risk, interest rate risk associated with the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet, and trading risk. Interest rate risk associated with the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet is the potential for movements in interest rates to cause changes in net interest income and the market value of equity. Trading risk is the potential for movements in market variables such as foreign exchange and interest rates to cause changes in the value of trading positions.





78 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Market Risk Framework and Governance
Northern Trust maintains a market risk framework consisting of risk management policies and practices to keep its risk profile within the Board-approved Corporate Risk Appetite Statement. All market risk activities are overseen by the Risk Management function, which is independent of the businesses undertaking the activities.
ExposureThe Asset and Liability Management Policy, Policy on Dealer Trading Activities, and exposure limits for market risk are set by the Board,board-level committees, and committee structures have been established to implement and monitor adherence to corporate policies, external regulations and established procedures. Limits are monitored based on measures such as sensitivity of net interest income (NII), sensitivity of market value of equity (MVE), and Value-at-Risk (VaR) across a range of time horizons.
Treasury, in the first line of defense, proposes market risk management strategies and is responsible for performing market risk management activities. The ALCO provides first line management oversight and is responsible for approving strategies and activities within the risk appetite, monitoring risk metrics, overseeing balance sheet resources, overseeing the execution of strategies, and reviewing reporting such as stress test results.
Market and Liquidity Risk Management, in the second line of defense, provides challenge to the first line activities, evaluates compliance with regulatory requirements and process effectiveness, and escalates material items for corrective action. The MLRC provides second line oversight and is responsible for reviewing market risk exposures, establishing and monitoring risk metrics, and approving key methodologies and assumptions that drive market risk measurement.


Interest Rate Risk Overview
Interest rate risk is the risk to NII, associated with the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet is the potential for deterioration in Northern Trust's financial position (e.g. interest income, market value of equity, or MVEcapital) due to changes in interest rates. NII and MVE sensitivity are the primary metrics used for measurement and management of interest rate risk. Changes in interest rates can have a positive or negative impact on NII depending on the positioning of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheetoff-balance sheet instruments. Changes in interest rates also can impact the values of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheetoff-balance sheet positions, which indirectlydirectly impact the MVE. To mitigate interest rate risk, the structure of the balance sheet is managed so that movements of interest rates on assets and liabilities (adjusted for hedges) are highlysufficiently correlated, which allows Northern Trust to manage its interest rate risk within its risk appetite.


82   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



There are four commonly recognized types of structuredstructural interest rate risk:risk associated with the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet:
repricing risk, which arises from differences in the maturity and repricing terms of assets and liabilities;
yield curve risk, which arises from changes in the shape of the yield curve;
basis risk, which arises from imperfect correlation in the adjustment of the rates earned and paid on different financial instruments with otherwise similar repricing characteristics; and
behavioral characteristics embedded optionality risk, which arises from client or counterparty behavior in response to interest rate changes.


Interest Rate Risk Analysis, Monitoring, and Reporting
Northern Trust uses two primary measurement techniques to manage interest rate risk: NII and MVE sensitivity. NII sensitivity provides management with a short-term view of the impact of interest rate changes on NII. MVE sensitivity provides management with a long-term view of interest rate changes on MVE as ofbased on the period-end balance sheet. Both simulation models use the same initial market interest rates and product balances.


Northern Trust limits aggregate interest rate risk (as measured by the NII sensitivity and MVE sensitivity simulation techniques) to an acceptable level within the context of risk appetite. A variety of actions may be used to implement risk management strategies to modify interest rate risk including:
purchase of investment securities;
sale of debtinvestment securities that are classified as available for sale;
issuance of senior notes and subordinated notes;
collateralized borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank; and
placing and taking Eurodollar time deposits; and
hedgeshedging with various types of derivative financial instruments.


2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 79

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NII Sensitivity
The modeling of NII sensitivity incorporates on-balance-sheeton-balance sheet positions, as well as derivative financial instruments (principally interest rate swaps) that are used to manage interest rate risk. Northern Trust uses market implied forward interest rates as the base case and measures the sensitivity (i.e., change) of a static balance sheet to changes in interest rates. Stress testing of interest rates is performed to include such scenarios as immediate parallel shocks to rates, nonparallel (i.e., twist) changes to yield curves that result in their becoming steeper or flatter, and changes to the relationship among the yield curves (i.e., basis risk).
The NII sensitivity analysis incorporates certain critical assumptions such as interest rates and client behaviors under changing rate environments. These assumptions are based on a combination of historical analysis and future expected pricing behavior. The simulation cannot precisely estimate NII sensitivity given uncertainty in the assumptions. The following key assumptions are incorporated into the NII simulation:
the balance sheet size and mix remains constant over the simulation horizon with maturing assets and liabilities replaced with instruments with similar terms as those that are maturing, with the exception of certain nonmaturity deposits that are considered short-term in nature and therefore receive a more conservative interest-bearing treatment;
prepayments on mortgage loans and securities collateralized by mortgages are projected under each rate scenario using a third-party mortgage analytics system that incorporates market prepayment assumptions;
cash flows for structured securities are estimated using a third-party vendor in conjunction with the prepayments provided by the third-party mortgage analytics vendor;
nonmaturity deposit pricing is projected based on Northern Trust’s actual historical patterns and management judgment, depending upon the availability of historical data and current pricing strategies/or judgment; and
new business rates are based on current spreads to market indices.


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 83

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



The following table shows the estimated NII impact over the next twelve months of 100 and 200 basis point ramps upward and 100 basis point ramp downward movements in interest rates relative to forward rates. Each rate movement is assumed to occur gradually over a one-year period.


TABLE 42:50: NET INTEREST INCOME SENSITIVITY AS OFDECEMBER 31, 2018
2020
($ In Millions)INCREASE/(DECREASE)
 
ESTIMATED IMPACT ON
NEXT TWELVE MONTHS
OF NET INTEREST INCOME

INCREASE IN INTEREST RATES ABOVE MARKET IMPLIED FORWARD RATES 
100 Basis Points$71
200 Basis Points109
DECREASE IN INTEREST RATES BELOW MARKET IMPLIED FORWARD RATES 
100 Basis Points(86)
($ In Millions)INCREASE/(DECREASE)
 
ESTIMATED IMPACT ON
NEXT TWELVE MONTHS
OF NET INTEREST INCOME
INCREASE IN INTEREST RATES ABOVE MARKET IMPLIED FORWARD RATES
100 Basis Points$249
200 Basis Points451
DECREASE IN INTEREST RATES BELOW MARKET IMPLIED FORWARD RATES
100 Basis Points$114


The NII sensitivity analysis does not incorporate certain management actions that may be used to mitigate adverse effects of actual interest rate movement. For that reason and others, the estimated impacts do not reflect the likely actual results but serve as estimates of interest rate risk. NII sensitivity is not comparable to actual results disclosed elsewhere or directly predictive of future values of other measures provided. Further, the estimated impacts presented above are not directly comparable to those presented in prior periods due to the impact of certain client deposit modeling enhancements.


MVE Sensitivity
MVE is defined as the present value of assets minus the present value of liabilities, net of the value of instrumentsfinancial derivatives that are used to manage the interest rate risk of balance sheet items. The potential effect of interest rate changes on MVE is derived from the impact of such changes on projected future cash flows and the present value of these cash flows and is then compared to the established limit. Northern Trust uses current market rates (and the future rates implied by these market rates) as the base case and measures MVE sensitivity under various rate scenarios. Stress testing of interest rates is performed to include such scenarios as immediate parallel shocks to rates, nonparallel (i.e., twist) changes to yield curves that result in their becoming steeper or flatter, and changes to the relationship among the yield curves (i.e., basis risk).
The MVE sensitivity analysis incorporates certain critical assumptions such as interest rates and client behaviors under changing rate environments. These assumptions are based on a combination of historical analysis and future expected pricing behavior. The simulation cannot precisely estimate MVE sensitivity given uncertainty in the assumptions. Many of the assumptions that apply to NII sensitivity also apply to MVE sensitivity simulations, with the following separate key assumptions incorporated into the MVE simulation:



80 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
the present value of nonmaturity deposits are estimated using dynamic decay methodologies or estimated remaining lives, which are based on a combination of Northern Trust’s actual historical runoff patterns and management judgment - judgment—some balances are assumed to be core and have longer lives while other balances are assumed to be temporary and have comparatively shorter lives; and
the present values of most noninterest-related balances (such as receivables, equipment, and payables) are the same as their book values.values; and

Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate forward interest rate paths.

The following table shows the estimated impact on MVE of 100 and 200 basis point shocks up and a 100 basis point shock down from current market implied forward rates.


TABLE 43:51: MARKET VALUE OF EQUITY SENSITIVITY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 20182020
($ In Millions)INCREASE/(DECREASE)

ESTIMATED IMPACT ON
MARKET VALUE OF
EQUITY

INCREASE IN INTEREST RATES ABOVE MARKET IMPLIED FORWARD RATES 
100 Basis Points$412
200 Basis Points383
DECREASE IN INTEREST RATES BELOW MARKET IMPLIED FORWARD RATES 
100 Basis Points(606)


($ In Millions)INCREASE/(DECREASE)

ESTIMATED IMPACT ON
MARKET VALUE OF
EQUITY
84   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation
INCREASE IN INTEREST RATES ABOVE MARKET IMPLIED FORWARD RATES
100 Basis Points$558
200 Basis Points551
DECREASE IN INTEREST RATES BELOW MARKET IMPLIED FORWARD RATES
100 Basis Points$328


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



The MVE simulations do not incorporate certain management actions that may be used to mitigate adverse effects of actual interest rate movements. For that reason and others, the estimated impacts do not reflect the likely actual results but serve as estimates of interest rate risk. MVE sensitivity is not comparable to actual results disclosed elsewhere or directly predictive of future values of other measures provided. Further, the estimated impacts presented above are not directly comparable to those presented in prior periods due to the impact of certain client deposit modeling enhancements.


During the year ended December 31, 2018, Northern Trust did not exceed the NII or MVE sensitivity tolerances established by the Board.

Foreign Currency Risk Overview
Northern Trust'sTrust’s balance sheet is exposed to nontrading foreign currency risk as a result of its holdings of non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities, investment in non-U.S. subsidiaries, and future non-U.S. dollar denominated revenue and expense. To manage currency exposures on the balance sheet, Northern Trust attempts to match its assets and liabilities by currency. If those currency offsets do not exist on the balance sheet, Northern Trust will use foreign exchange derivative contracts to mitigate its currency exposure. Foreign exchange contracts are also used to reduce Northern Trust’s currency exposure to future non-U.S. dollar denominated revenue and expense.
In addition, Northern Trust provides global foreign exchange (GFX) services to clients. Most of these services are provided in connection with Northern Trust’s growing global custody business. In the normal course of business, Northern Trust also engages in trading of non-U.S. currencies for its own account. Both activities are considered trading activities. The primary market risk associated with global foreign exchange trading activities is foreign exchange risk.
Foreign currency trading positions exist when aggregate obligations to purchase and sell a currency other than the U.S. dollar do not offset each other in amount, or offset each other over different time periods. The GFX trading portfolio at Northern Trust is composed of spot, forward, and non-deliverable foreign currency transactions. For GFX, spot risk is driven primarily by foreign exchange rate (FX) risk, and forward risk is driven primarily by interest rate (IR) risk.


Foreign Currency Risk Measurement
Northern Trust measures daily the risk of loss associated with all non-U.S. currency positions using a VaR model and applying the historical simulation methodology. This statistical model provides estimates, based on a variety of high confidence levels, of the potential loss in value that might be incurred if an adverse shift in non-U.S. currency exchange rates were to occur over a small number of days. The model incorporates foreign currency and interest rate volatilities and correlations in price movements among the currencies. VaR is computed for each trading desk and for the global portfolio.
VaR measures are computed in a vendedvendor software application which reads foreign exchange positions from Northern Trust’s trading systems each day. Data vendors provide foreign exchange rates and interest rates for all currencies. The Risk Management function monitors on a daily basis VaR model inputs and outputs for reasonableness.


Foreign Currency Risk Monitoring, Reporting and Analysis
Northern Trust monitors several variations of the foreign exchangeGFX VaR measures to meet specific regulatory and internal management needs. Variations include different methodologies (historical variance-covariancesimulation, Monte Carlo simulation and Monte Carlo)Taylor approximation), equally weighted and exponentially weighted volatilities, horizons of one day and ten days, confidence levels ranging fromof 95% to 99.95% and look back99%, subcomponent VaRs using only FX drivers and only IR drivers, and look-back periods of one year, two years, and four years. Those alternative measures provide management an array of corroborating metrics and alternative perspectives on Northern Trust’s market risks.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 81

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Automated daily reports are produced and distributed to business managers and risk managers. The Risk Management function also reviews and reports several variations of the VaR measures in historical time series format to provide management with a historical perspective on risk.
The following table below presents the levels of total regulatory VaR and its subcomponents for global foreign currencyGFX in the years indicated below, based on the historical simulation methodology, a 99% confidence level, a one-day horizon and equally weightedequally-weighted volatility. The total VaR for foreign currencyGFX is typically less than the sum of its two componentssubcomponents due to diversification benefits derived from the two subcomponents.


TABLE 44:52: GLOBAL FOREIGN CURRENCY VALUE-AT-RISK
($ In Millions)TOTAL VaR
(FX AND IR DRIVERS)
FX VaR (FX DRIVERS ONLY)IR VaR (IR DRIVERS ONLY)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,202020192020201920202019
High$1.8 $0.3 $1.9 $0.3 $1.0 $0.2 
Low —  —  — 
Average0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 
As of December 31,0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 
($ In Millions)
TOTAL VaR
(SPOT AND FORWARD)
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
SPOT VaR
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
FORWARD VaR
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
High$0.3
$1.6
$0.2
$1.6
$0.3
$1.2
Low0.1
0.1



0.1
Average0.1
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
As of December 31,0.1
0.3
0.1

0.1
0.3


During 2018 and 2017,2020, Northern Trust did not incur an actual GFX trading loss in excess of the daily value at riskGFX VaR estimate. During 2019, Northern Trust experienced one day of actual GFX trading loss in excess of the daily GFX VaR estimate.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 85

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



Other Nonmaterial Trading Activities
Market risk associated with other trading activities is negligible. Northern Trust’s broker-dealer subsidiary, Northern Trust Securities, Inc., maintains a small portfolio of trading securities held for customer accommodation purposes, which averaged $1.2$1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020.
Northern Trust is also party to interest rate derivative contracts consisting mostly of interest rate swaps and swaptions entered into to meet clients’ interest rate risk management needs, but also including a small number of caps floors, and swaptions (an option to enter into an interest rate swap).floors. All interest rate derivative transactions are executed by theNorthern Trust's Treasury department. When Northern Trust enters into client transactions, its practice is to mitigate the resulting market risk with offsetting interbank derivative transactions with matching terms and maturities.


Strategic Risk
Strategic risk is the vulnerability of the organization to internal or external developments that render corporate strategy ineffective or unachievable. The consequences of strategic risk can be diminished long-term earnings and capital, as well as reputational damage to the firm. Strategic risk includes the following three subcategories:encompasses two main areas:


Macroeconomic and geopolitical risk which centers on external events or themesdevelopments that would have a significant, detrimental impact on financial markets and by extension,and/or financial services firms. Episodes of this kind would tend to have general, as opposed to idiosyncratic, consequences.
Business risk which arises from change in the following areas:
Internal: situations within Northern Trustinternal, secular, competitive, or regulatory trends that threaten business continuity, profitability, or the achievement of strategic objectives
Secular: behavioral or technological change that affects clients and renders a Northern Trust process or service obsolete
Competitive: new products or shifts in the industry landscape that challengeimpact Northern Trust’s performance
Regulatory: changes to prudential or fiscal policy that have an adverse impact on Northern Truststated strategy or its clientsachievability.
Reputation risk is a residual risk which arises from negative perception on the part of clients, counterparties, stockholders, investors, debt holders, market analysts, regulators, staff, or other relevant parties that adversely affects Northern Trust’s ability to conduct its business. Reputation risk can arise from a range of risk events and is not limited to strategic risk.

Strategic Risk Framework and Governance
Northern Trust maintains a framework that consists ofThe Corporate Strategic Risk Framework has been developed in conjunction with the Corporation’s risk appetite and risk management policies, and practices designed to identify, analyze,defines the mission and limit (where possible)expectations of the impact of strategic risk. The Strategic Risk Management function to identify and analyze the sources and consequences of strategic risk.
This is responsible for defining this frameworkachieved through participation in the establishment and providing independent oversightreview of its application across Northern Trust. In furtherancebusiness line strategy, coordination of this effort, Northern Trust has established governance around itsrisk input to the evaluation of key strategic planning processesopportunities, and developing and maintaining a risk inventory and set of metrics which attempt to review and challengegauge the level of strategic decisions.risk within the organization.
In addition, Northern Trust maintains a Global Stress Testing Framework which guides stress testing exercises across the company. Enterprise stress testing, a component of this effort, is specifically designed to look at the prospective impact of internal and external shocks on the organization. Northern Trust alsoStrategic Risk Management function maintains the Global EmergencyEvent Response Plan,Program, which guides its reactionaims to adverse external events ifanticipate and prepare for stress scenarios, and provide an outline for responding to them when they arise.occur.
Both GERC and the Business Risk Committee are responsible for reviewing the general methods, guidelines and policiesframeworks by which Northern Trust monitors and controlsevaluates strategic risk.



82 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report may include statements which constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are identified typically by words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “likely,” “plan,” “goal,” “target,” “strategy,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements, other than those related to historical facts, that relate to Northern Trust’s financial results and outlook; capital adequacy; dividend policy and share repurchase program; accounting estimates and assumptions; credit quality including allowance levels; future pension plan contributions; effective tax rate; anticipated expense levels; contingent liabilities; acquisitions; strategies; market and industry trends; and expectations regarding the impact of accounting pronouncements and legislation. These statements are based on Northern Trust’s current beliefs and expectations of future events or future results, and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and subject to change. These statements are also based on assumptions about many important factors, including:

the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic—and governmental and societal responses thereto—on Northern Trust’s business, financial condition, and results of operations;
86   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


financial market disruptions or economic recession in the United States or other countries across the globe resulting from any of a number of factors, including, for example, actual or potential changes to international trade policy;factors;
volatility or changes in financial markets, including debt and equity markets, that impact the value, liquidity, or credit ratings of financial assets in general, or financial assets held in particular investment funds or client portfolios, including those funds, portfolios, and other financial assets with respect to which Northern Trust has taken, or may in the future take, actions to provide asset value stability or additional liquidity;
the impact of equity markets on fee revenue;
the downgrade of U.S. government-issued and other securities;
changes in foreign exchange trading client volumes and volatility in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in the valuation of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies in which Northern Trust records revenue or accrues expenses, and Northern Trust’s success in assessing and mitigating the risks arising from all such changes and volatility;
a decline in the value of securities held in Northern Trust’s investment portfolio, particularly asset-backed securities, the liquidity and pricing of which may be negatively impacted by periods of economic turmoil and financial market disruptions;
Northern Trust’s ability to address operating risks, including those related to cyber-security,cybersecurity, data security, human errors or omissions, pricing or valuation of securities, fraud, systems performance or defects, systems interruptions, and breakdowns in processes or internal controls;
Northern Trust's success in responding to and investing in changes and advancements in technology;
a significant downgrade of any of Northern Trust’s debt ratings;
the health and soundness of the financial institutions and other counterparties with which Northern Trust conducts business;
uncertainties inherent in the complex and subjective judgments required to assess credit risk and establish appropriate allowances therefor;
changes in the method pursuant to whichavailability of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or otherthe calculation of alternative interest rate benchmarks are determined;benchmarks;
the pace and extent of continued globalization of investment activity and growth in worldwide financial assets;
changes in interest rates or in the monetary or other policies of various regulatory authorities or central banks;
changes in the legal, regulatory and enforcement framework and oversight applicable to financial institutions, including Northern Trust;
increased costs of compliance and other risks associated with changes in regulation, the current regulatory environment, and areas of increased regulatory emphasis and oversight in the United States and other countries, such as anti-money laundering, anti-bribery, and clientdata privacy;
failure to address in the Corporation's resolution plan submitted in December 2017 the “shortcomings” jointly identified by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC in the resolution plan submitted by the Corporation in December 2015;
failure to satisfy regulatory standards or to obtain regulatory approvals when required, including for the use and distribution of capital;
changes in tax laws, accounting requirements or interpretations and other legislation in the United States or other countries that could affect Northern Trust or its clients including with respectclients;
geopolitical risks, risks related to the adoption of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act;
geopolitical risksglobal climate change and the risks of extraordinary events such as pandemics, natural disasters, terrorist events and war, and the responses of the United States and other countries to those events;
the pending departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit,” and any negative effects thereof on global economic conditions, global financial markets, and our business and results of operations;
changes in the nature and activities of Northern Trust’s competition;
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 83

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Northern Trust’s success in maintaining existing business and continuing to generate new business in existing and targeted markets and its ability to deploy deposits in a profitable manner consistent with its liquidity requirements;
Northern Trust’s ability to address the complex needs of a global client base and manage compliance with legal, tax, regulatory and other requirements;
Northern Trust’s ability to maintain a product mix that achieves acceptable margins;
Northern Trust’s ability to continue to generate investment results that satisfy clients and to develop an array of investment products;
the effectiveness of Northern Trust’s management of its human capital, including its success in recruiting and retaining the necessary personnel to support business growth and expansion and maintain sufficient expertise to support increasingly complex products and services;

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 87

Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Northern Trust’s success in implementing its expense management initiatives, including its “Value for Spend” initiative;initiatives;
uncertainties inherent in Northern Trust’s assumptions concerning its pension plan, including discount rates and expected contributions, returns and payouts;
Northern Trust’s success in continuing to enhance its risk management practices and controls and managing risks inherent in its businesses, including credit risk, operational risk, market and liquidity risk, fiduciary risk, compliance risk and strategic risk;
risks and uncertainties inherent in the litigation and regulatory process, including the possibility that losses may be in excess of Northern Trust’s recorded liability and estimated range of possible loss for litigation exposures;
risks associated with being a holding company, including Northern Trust’s dependence on dividends from its principal subsidiary;
the risk of damage to Northern Trust’s reputation which may undermine the confidence of clients, counterparties, rating agencies, and stockholders; and
other factors identified elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including those factors described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and other filings with the SEC, all of which are available on Northern Trust’s website.

Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. The information contained herein is current only as of the date of that information. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information presently available, and Northern Trust assumes no obligation to update its forward-looking statements.

RECONCILIATION TO FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT

84 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Reconciliation to Fully Taxable Equivalent
The following table presents a reconciliation of interest income, net interest income, net interest margin, and total revenue prepared in accordance with GAAP to such measures on an FTE basis, which are non-GAAP financial measures. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing annualized net interest income by average interest-earning assets. Management believes this presentation provides a clearer indication of these financial measures for comparative purposes. When adjusted to an FTE basis, yields on taxable, nontaxable and partially taxable assets are comparable; however, the adjustment to an FTE basis has no impact on net income.


TABLE 45:53: RECONCILIATION TO FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)202020192018
Net Interest Income
Interest Income - GAAP$1,643.5 $2,499.9 $2,321.4 
Add: FTE Adjustment34.4 32.8 41.2 
Interest Income (FTE) - Non-GAAP$1,677.9 $2,532.7 $2,362.6 
Net Interest Income - GAAP$1,443.2 $1,677.9 $1,622.7 
Add: FTE Adjustment34.4 32.8 41.2 
Net Interest Income (FTE) - Non-GAAP$1,477.6 $1,710.7 $1,663.9 
Net Interest Margin - GAAP1.16 %1.57 %1.43 %
Net Interest Margin (FTE) - Non-GAAP1.19 %1.60 %1.46 %
Total Revenue
Total Revenue - GAAP$6,100.8 $6,073.1 $5,960.2 
Add: FTE Adjustment34.4 32.8 41.2 
Total Revenue (FTE) - Non-GAAP$6,135.2 $6,105.9 $6,001.4 
 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
 201820172016
($ In Millions)REPORTED
FTE ADJ.
FTE
REPORTED
FTE ADJ.
FTE
REPORTED
FTE ADJ.
FTE
Interest Income$2,321.4
$41.2
$2,362.6
$1,769.4
$45.8
$1,815.2
$1,416.9
$25.1
$1,442.0
Interest Expense698.7

698.7
340.2

340.2
182.0

182.0
Net Interest Income$1,622.7
$41.2
$1,663.9
$1,429.2
$45.8
$1,475.0
$1,234.9
$25.1
$1,260.0
Net Interest Margin1.43% 1.46%1.29% 1.33%1.15% 1.18%
          
Total Revenue$5,960.2
$41.2
$6,001.4
$5,375.3
$45.8
$5,421.1
$4,961.8
$25.1
$4,986.9

 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
    20152014
($ In Millions)   REPORTED
FTE ADJ.
FTE
REPORTED
FTE ADJ.
FTE
Interest Income   $1,224.0
$25.3
$1,249.3
$1,186.9
$29.4
$1,216.3
Interest Expense   153.9

153.9
181.4

181.4
Net Interest Income   $1,070.1
$25.3
$1,095.4
$1,005.5
$29.4
$1,034.9
Net Interest Margin   1.05% 1.07%1.05% 1.08%
          
Total Revenue   $4,702.6
$25.3
$4,727.9
$4,331.2
$29.4
$4,360.6

88   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation85

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following table presents quarterly financial data for years ended 2020 and 2019.

TABLE 54: QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
STATEMENTS OF INCOME20202019
($ In Millions Except Per Share Information)FOURTH
QUARTER
THIRD
QUARTER
SECOND
QUARTER
FIRST
QUARTER
FOURTH
QUARTER
THIRD
QUARTER
SECOND
QUARTER
FIRST
QUARTER
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$1,026.1 $1,003.8 $961.5 $1,003.6 $992.2 $975.5 $955.5 $928.9 
Other Noninterest Income161.4 152.7 172.5 176.0 134.7 144.7 133.7 130.0 
Net Interest Income
Interest Income352.6 355.4 406.3 529.2 576.1 620.8 640.2 662.8 
Interest Expense18.2 26.8 34.2 121.1 155.3 203.1 222.8 240.8 
Net Interest Income334.4 328.6 372.1 408.1 420.8 417.7 417.4 422.0 
Revenue1,521.9 1,485.1 1,506.1 1,587.7 1,547.7 1,537.9 1,506.6 1,480.9 
Provision for Credit Losses(2.5)0.5 66.0 61.0 (1.0)(7.0)(6.5)— 
Noninterest Expense1,151.0 1,094.7 1,036.9 1,065.6 1,072.3 1,036.3 1,006.2 1,028.7 
Provision for Income Taxes132.5 95.4 89.9 100.5 105.3 124.0 117.5 105.1 
Net Income$240.9 $294.5 $313.3 $360.6 $371.1 $384.6 $389.4 $347.1 
Preferred Stock Dividends4.7 16.2 4.8 30.5 5.8 17.4 5.9 17.3 
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock$236.2 $278.3 $308.5 $330.1 $365.3 $367.2 $383.5 $329.8 
PER COMMON SHARE
Net Income – Basic$1.13 $1.32 $1.47 $1.56 $1.71 $1.70 $1.76 $1.49 
    – Diluted1.12 1.32 1.46 1.55 1.70 1.69 1.75 1.48 
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET ASSETS
Cash and Due from Banks$2,434.5 $2,293.3 $2,966.7 $2,723.0 $2,292.6 $2,551.5 $2,784.3 $1,940.7 
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other(1)
29,896.2 31,602.3 30,299.0 19,826.2 17,230.0 17,524.9 19,236.2 20,163.2 
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(2)
5,449.0 4,816.1 5,505.7 5,838.1 6,073.9 5,656.5 5,811.9 6,452.2 
Federal Funds Sold0.6 2.5 0.1 5.9 3.8 4.6 5.3 38.0 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell1,565.8 1,789.8 985.8 661.7 942.1 812.3 645.6 940.1 
Securities(3)
61,227.4 58,072.1 52,884.4 51,963.2 51,919.0 50,024.9 48,911.2 51,889.3 
Loans and Leases33,096.1 33,085.2 35,506.7 32,316.2 30,990.8 30,935.9 31,098.9 31,189.4 
Allowance for Credit Losses(222.7)(218.4)(160.2)(109.9)(105.5)(111.2)(115.1)(114.0)
Other Assets9,815.1 9,482.5 10,782.4 10,946.1 8,758.6 8,952.7 7,980.6 6,917.8 
Total Assets$143,262.0 $140,925.4 $138,770.6 $124,170.5 $118,105.3 $116,352.1 $116,358.9 $119,416.7 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing$26,997.5 $25,202.3 $21,856.7 $19,331.5 $17,462.9 $16,687.3 $17,826.5 $17,858.4 
Savings, Money Market, and Other24,984.3 24,305.4 24,017.0 20,251.2 18,130.2 17,802.7 15,950.9 14,372.8 
Savings Certificates and Other Time1,198.3 1,502.1 1,403.6 959.8 919.0 898.9 888.6 761.4 
Non-U.S. Offices – Interest-Bearing61,943.6 61,834.9 63,592.7 54,543.3 52,925.8 53,631.5 54,679.9 58,377.2 
Total Deposits115,123.7 112,844.7 110,870.0 95,085.8 89,437.9 89,020.4 89,345.9 91,369.8 
Federal Funds Purchased562.7 275.6 1,181.0 1,916.5 856.6 595.4 1,298.3 2,342.9 
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase183.6 185.3 170.7 334.3 281.0 340.3 394.5 340.7 
Other Borrowings5,984.4 6,167.8 6,008.4 7,450.6 7,632.9 7,833.1 7,734.8 7,810.4 
Senior Notes3,315.4 3,666.3 3,332.9 2,615.1 2,584.6 2,587.7 2,361.4 2,014.1 
Long-Term Debt1,190.9 1,199.0 1,198.3 1,168.7 1,154.0 1,156.7 1,131.6 1,112.9 
Floating Rate Capital Debt277.8 277.7 277.7 277.7 277.7 277.7 277.6 277.6 
Other Liabilities5,090.4 4,906.1 4,690.2 4,534.8 4,948.0 3,853.0 3,276.7 3,719.5 
Stockholders’ Equity11,533.1 11,402.9 11,041.4 10,787.0 10,932.6 10,687.8 10,538.1 10,428.8 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$143,262.0 $140,925.4 $138,770.6 $124,170.5 $118,105.3 $116,352.1 $116,358.9 $119,416.7 
(1) Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other includes collateral deposits with certain securities depositories and clearing houses, which are classified in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, and 2019.
(2) Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks includes the interest-bearing component of Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks as presented on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, and 2019..
(3) Securities include Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock and certain community development investments which are classified in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.




86 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation






ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the “Risk Management” section of Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” ofOperations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 89



ITEM 8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
In addition to the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes provided below, the table titled “Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)” under “Supplementalin Item – Selected Statistical7, “Management's Discussion and SupplementalAnalysis of Financial Data”Condition and Results of Operations” in this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.


REPORTOFINDEPENDENTREGISTEREDPUBLICACCOUNTINGFIRM


TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Northern Trust Corporation and subsidiaries (the Corporation) as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2018,2020, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Corporation as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2018,2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20182020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 26, 201923, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation has changed its method of accounting for the recognition and measurement of credit losses as of January 1, 2020 due to the adoption of ASC Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Corporation in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 87





Assessment of the allowance for credit losses for commercial loans and leases evaluated on a collective basis
As discussed in Notes 1 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation’s allowance for credit losses for commercial loans and leases evaluated on a collective basis (the collective ACL) was $133.4 million of a total allowance for credit losses assigned to loans and leases of $190.7 million as of December 31, 2020. Expected credit losses are measured on a collective basis as long as the financial assets included in the respective pool share similar risk characteristics. The allowance estimation methodology for the collective assessment is primarily based on internal loss data specific to the Corporation’s financial asset portfolio from a historical observation period that includes both expansionary and recessionary periods. The estimation methodology and the related qualitative adjustment framework segregate the loan and lease portfolio into segments based on loan and obligor specific factors, including loan type, borrower type, collateral type, loan size, and borrower credit quality. The estimation methodology applies probability of default and loss given default assumptions to the exposure at default on a pool basis. For each segment, the probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) are derived for each quarter of the remaining life of each instrument. For the first two years (the reasonable and supportable period), these factors are derived by applying quarterly macroeconomic projections using models developed from historical data on macroeconomic factors and loans with similar factors, including the borrower rating assigned to individual obligors, as applicable. For periods beyond the reasonable and supportable period, the Corporation reverts to its own long-run historical loss experience on a straight-line basis over four quarters. The exposure at default for every quarter is based on contractual balances as of each quarter-end. Estimating expected lifetime credit losses requires the consideration of the effect of future economic conditions. The Corporation employs multiple scenarios over a reasonable and supportable period to project future conditions. The Corporation determines the probability weights assigned to each scenario at each quarter-end. The quantitative allowance is then reviewed within the qualitative adjustment framework, through which the Corporation applies judgment by assessing internal risk factors, potential limitations in the quantitative methodology, and environmental factors that are not fully contemplated in the forecast to compute an adjustment to the quantitative allowance for each segment of the loan portfolio.
We identified the assessment of the quantitative component of the collective ACL as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment of the quantitative component of the collective ACL due to significant measurement uncertainty. Specifically, the assessment encompassed the evaluation of the quantitative component of the collective ACL methodology, including the methods and models used to estimate the PD and LGD and their significant assumptions, including the multiple economic forecast scenarios and macroeconomic factors and their respective weightings, the reasonable and supportable period, the historical observation period, and borrower ratings for certain commercial loans and leases. In addition, auditor judgment was required to evaluate the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the critical audit matter. This included controls related to the Corporation’s measurement of the quantitative component of the collective ACL estimate, including controls over:
development of the quantitative component of the collective ACL methodology
development of the PD and LGD models
ongoing monitoring of the PD and LGD models
development and approval of the multiple economic forecast scenarios, macroeconomic factors and their respective weightings
determination and measurement of the significant assumptions used in the PD and LGD models
analysis of the allowance for credit losses for loans and leases results.
We evaluated the Corporation’s process to develop the quantitative component of the collective ACL estimate by testing certain sources of data, factors, and assumptions that the Corporation used, and considered the relevance and reliability of such data, factors and assumptions. In addition, we involved credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:
evaluating the quantitative component of the Corporation’s collective ACL methodology for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles



88 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




evaluating judgments made by the Corporation relative to the development and performance monitoring of the PD and LGD models
assessing the conceptual soundness and performance testing of the PD and LGD models by inspecting model documentation to determine whether the models were suitable for their intended use
assessing the economic forecast scenarios, the economic input variables and their respective weightings through comparison to publicly available forecasts and the Corporation’s business environment
evaluating the length of the historical observation period and reasonable and supportable period by comparing them to specific portfolio risk characteristics and trends
testing individual borrower ratings for a selection of commercial loan and lease relationships by evaluating the financial performance of the borrower, sources of repayment, and any relevant guarantees or underlying collateral, where applicable.
We also assessed the sufficiency of the audit evidence obtained related to the quantitative component of the collective ACL by evaluating the:
cumulative results of the procedures
qualitative aspects of the Corporation’s accounting practices
potential bias in the accounting estimate

ntrs-20201231_g2.jpg


We have served as the Corporation’s auditor since 2002.


CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
FEBRUARY 26, 2019

23, 2021
90   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation89


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
               DECEMBER 31,DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions Except Share Information)2018
2017
(In Millions Except Share Information)20202019
ASSETS ASSETS
Cash and Due from Banks$4,581.6
$4,518.1
Cash and Due from Banks$4,389.5 $4,459.2 
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits30,080.2
40,479.1
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits55,503.6 33,886.0 
Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks4,264.2
5,611.9
Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks4,372.6 4,877.1 
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell1,165.2
1,324.3
Federal Funds SoldFederal Funds Sold0 5.0 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to ResellSecurities Purchased under Agreements to Resell1,596.5 707.8 
Debt Securities Debt Securities
Available for Sale36,888.8
33,742.1
Held to Maturity (Fair value of $14,267.0 and $13,010.9)14,354.0
13,049.0
Available for Sale (Amortized cost of $41,155.7 and $38,722.2)Available for Sale (Amortized cost of $41,155.7 and $38,722.2)42,022.0 38,876.3 
Held to Maturity (Fair value of $17,797.4 and $12,249.3)Held to Maturity (Fair value of $17,797.4 and $12,249.3)17,791.1 12,284.5 
Trading Account0.3
0.5
Trading Account0.5 0.3 
 
Total Debt Securities51,243.1
46,791.6
Total Debt Securities59,813.6 51,161.1 
 
Loans and Leases Loans and Leases
Commercial15,175.2
14,558.0
Commercial15,262.0 14,001.3 
Personal17,314.8
18,034.2
Personal18,497.7 17,408.3 
 
Total Loans and Leases (Net of unearned income of $13.2 and $35.5)32,490.0
32,592.2
 
Allowance for Credit Losses Assigned to Loans and Leases(112.6)(131.2)
Total Loans and Leases (Net of unearned income of $9.8 and $14.1)Total Loans and Leases (Net of unearned income of $9.8 and $14.1)33,759.7 31,409.6 
Allowance for Credit LossesAllowance for Credit Losses(198.8)(104.5)
Buildings and Equipment428.2
464.6
Buildings and Equipment514.9 483.3 
Client Security Settlement Receivables1,646.1
1,647.0
Client Security Settlement Receivables1,160.2 845.7 
Goodwill669.3
605.6
Goodwill707.2 696.8 
Other Assets5,757.2
4,687.3
Other Assets8,384.9 8,401.3 
 
Total Assets$132,212.5
$138,590.5
Total Assets$170,003.9 $136,828.4 
 
LIABILITIES LIABILITIES
Deposits Deposits
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing$14,508.0
$18,712.2
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing$17,728.5 $14,114.7 
Savings, Money Market and Other Interest-Bearing14,612.0
16,975.3
Savings, Money Market and Other Interest-Bearing28,631.8 21,441.5 
Savings Certificates and Other Time688.7
1,152.3
Savings Certificates and Other Time937.1 986.7 
Non U.S. Offices – Noninterest-Bearing8,220.1
9,878.8
– Interest-Bearing66,468.0
65,672.2
Non U.S. Offices — Noninterest-BearingNon U.S. Offices — Noninterest-Bearing25,382.2 12,177.4 
— Interest-Bearing — Interest-Bearing71,198.4 60,400.3 
Total Deposits104,496.8
112,390.8
Total Deposits143,878.0 109,120.6 
Federal Funds Purchased2,594.2
2,286.1
Federal Funds Purchased260.2 552.9 
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase168.3
834.0
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase39.8 489.7 
Other Borrowings7,901.7
6,051.1
Other Borrowings4,011.5 6,744.8 
Senior Notes2,011.3
1,497.3
Senior Notes3,122.4 2,573.0 
Long-Term Debt1,112.4
1,449.5
Long-Term Debt1,189.3 1,148.1 
Floating Rate Capital Debt277.6
277.5
Floating Rate Capital Debt277.8 277.7 
Other Liabilities3,141.9
3,588.0
Other Liabilities5,536.6 4,830.6 
 
Total Liabilities121,704.2
128,374.3
Total Liabilities158,315.6 125,737.4 
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred Stock, No Par Value; Authorized 10,000,000 shares: Preferred Stock, No Par Value; Authorized 10,000,000 shares:
Series C, outstanding shares of 16,000388.5
388.5
Series C, outstanding shares of 0 and 16,000Series C, outstanding shares of 0 and 16,0000 388.5 
Series D, outstanding shares of 5,000493.5
493.5
Series D, outstanding shares of 5,000493.5 493.5 
Common Stock, $1.66 2/3 Par Value; Authorized 560,000,000 shares; Outstanding shares of 219,012,050 and 226,126,674408.6
408.6
Series E, outstanding shares of 16,000Series E, outstanding shares of 16,000391.4 391.4 
Common Stock, $1.66 2/3 Par Value; Authorized 560,000,000 shares; Outstanding shares of 208,289,178 and 209,709,046Common Stock, $1.66 2/3 Par Value; Authorized 560,000,000 shares; Outstanding shares of 208,289,178 and 209,709,046408.6 408.6 
Additional Paid-In Capital1,068.5
1,047.2
Additional Paid-In Capital963.6 1,013.1 
Retained Earnings10,776.8
9,685.1
Retained Earnings12,207.7 11,656.7 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(453.7)(414.3)
Treasury Stock (26,159,474 and 19,044,850 shares, at cost)(2,173.9)(1,392.4)
 
Total Stockholders' Equity10,508.3
10,216.2
 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity$132,212.5
$138,590.5
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)428.0 (194.7)
Treasury Stock (36,882,346 and 35,462,478 shares, at cost)Treasury Stock (36,882,346 and 35,462,478 shares, at cost)(3,204.5)(3,066.1)
Total Stockholders’ EquityTotal Stockholders’ Equity11,688.3 11,091.0 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ EquityTotal Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$170,003.9 $136,828.4 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements on pages 95-166.

94-168.



201890 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation91

Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions Except Share Information)202020192018
Noninterest Income
       Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,995.0 $3,852.1 $3,753.7 
       Foreign Exchange Trading Income290.4 250.9 307.2 
       Treasury Management Fees45.4 44.5 51.8 
       Security Commissions and Trading Income133.2 103.6 98.3 
       Other Operating Income194.0 145.5 127.5 
       Investment Security Gains (Losses), net (Note)(0.4)(1.4)(1.0)
Total Noninterest Income4,657.6 4,395.2 4,337.5 
Net Interest Income
       Interest Income1,643.5 2,499.9 2,321.4 
       Interest Expense200.3 822.0 698.7 
Net Interest Income1,443.2 1,677.9 1,622.7 
Provision for Credit Losses125.0 (14.5)(14.5)
Net Interest Income after Provision for Credit Losses1,318.2 1,692.4 1,637.2 
Noninterest Expense
      Compensation1,947.1 1,859.0 1,806.9 
      Employee Benefits387.7 355.2 356.7 
      Outside Services763.1 774.5 739.4 
      Equipment and Software673.5 612.1 582.2 
      Occupancy230.1 212.9 201.1 
      Other Operating Expense346.7 329.8 330.6 
Total Noninterest Expense4,348.2 4,143.5 4,016.9 
Income before Income Taxes1,627.6 1,944.1 1,957.8 
Provision for Income Taxes418.3 451.9 401.4 
NET INCOME$1,209.3 $1,492.2 $1,556.4 
Preferred Stock Dividends56.2 46.4 46.4 
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock$1,153.1 $1,445.8 $1,510.0 
PER COMMON SHARE
Net Income – Basic$5.48 $6.66 $6.68 
– Diluted5.46 6.63 6.64 
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding – Basic208,319,412 214,525,547 223,148,335 
– Diluted209,007,986 215,601,149 224,488,326 
Note: Changes in Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment (OTTI) Losses
          prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13
$0 $(0.3)$(0.5)
Other Security Gains (Losses), net(0.4)(1.1)(0.5)
Investment Security Gains (Losses), net$(0.4)$(1.4)$(1.0)
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions Except Share Information)2018
2017
2016
Noninterest Income   
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,753.7
$3,434.3
$3,108.1
Foreign Exchange Trading Income307.2
209.9
236.6
Treasury Management Fees51.8
56.4
62.8
Security Commissions and Trading Income98.3
89.6
81.4
Other Operating Income127.5
157.5
241.2
Investment Security Losses, net (Note)(1.0)(1.6)(3.2)
Total Noninterest Income4,337.5
3,946.1
3,726.9
Net Interest Income   
Interest Income2,321.4
1,769.4
1,416.9
Interest Expense698.7
340.2
182.0
Net Interest Income1,622.7
1,429.2
1,234.9
Provision for Credit Losses(14.5)(28.0)(26.0)
Net Interest Income after Provision for Credit Losses1,637.2
1,457.2
1,260.9
Noninterest Expense   
Compensation1,806.9
1,733.7
1,541.1
Employee Benefits356.7
319.9
293.3
Outside Services739.4
668.4
627.1
Equipment and Software582.2
524.0
467.4
Occupancy201.1
191.8
177.4
Other Operating Expense330.6
331.6
364.4
Total Noninterest Expense4,016.9
3,769.4
3,470.7
Income before Income Taxes1,957.8
1,633.9
1,517.1
Provision for Income Taxes401.4
434.9
484.6
NET INCOME$1,556.4
$1,199.0
$1,032.5
Preferred Stock Dividends46.4
49.8
23.4
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock$1,510.0
$1,149.2
$1,009.1
PER COMMON SHARE   
Net Income – Basic$6.68
$4.95
$4.35
                   – Diluted6.64
4.92
4.32
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding – Basic223,148,335
228,257,664
227,580,584
– Diluted224,488,326
229,654,401
229,151,406
    
Note:   Changes in Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment (OTTI) Losses$(0.5)$(0.2)$(3.7)
Other Security Gains/(Losses), net(0.5)(1.4)0.5
Investment Security Losses, net$(1.0)$(1.6)$(3.2)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
(In Millions)202020192018
Net Income$1,556.4
$1,199.0
$1,032.5
Net Income$1,209.3 $1,492.2 $1,556.4 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Net of Tax and Reclassifications) Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Net of Tax and Reclassifications)
Net Unrealized (Losses) Gains on Debt Securities Available for Sale(22.3)(42.4)(1.4)
Net Unrealized Gains on Debt Securities Available for SaleNet Unrealized Gains on Debt Securities Available for Sale527.8 228.9 (22.3)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges(1.4)(1.6)9.1
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges0.5 (7.7)(1.4)
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments22.2
16.7
(0.9)
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments(12.6)(17.0)(4.1)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(14.1)(44.3)2.7
Net Foreign Currency AdjustmentsNet Foreign Currency Adjustments26.9 49.9 22.2 
Net Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit AdjustmentsNet Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments67.5 (12.1)(12.6)
Other Comprehensive IncomeOther Comprehensive Income622.7 259.0 (14.1)
Comprehensive Income$1,542.3
$1,154.7
$1,035.2
Comprehensive Income$1,832.0 $1,751.2 $1,542.3 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements on pages 95-166.

94-168.
92   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation91


Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
PREFERRED STOCK   
Balance at January 1$882.0
$882.0
$388.5
Issuance of Preferred Stock, Series D

493.5
    
Balance at December 31882.0
882.0
882.0
    
COMMON STOCK   
Balance at January 1 and December 31408.6
408.6
408.6
    
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL   
Balance at January 11,047.2
1,035.8
1,072.3
Treasury Stock Transactions – Stock Options and Awards(110.2)(117.1)(116.6)
Stock Options and Awards – Amortization131.5
128.5
87.7
Stock Options and Awards – Tax Benefits

(7.6)
    
Balance at December 311,068.5
1,047.2
1,035.8
    
RETAINED EARNINGS   
Balance at January 19,685.1
8,908.4
8,242.8
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income25.3


Change in Accounting Principle(4.5)

Net Income1,556.4
1,199.0
1,032.5
Dividends Declared – Common Stock(439.1)(372.5)(343.5)
Dividends Declared – Preferred Stock(46.4)(49.8)(23.4)
    
Balance at December 3110,776.8
9,685.1
8,908.4
    
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)   
Balance at January 1(414.3)(370.0)(372.7)
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(25.3)

Net Unrealized (Losses) Gains on Debt Securities Available for Sale(22.3)(42.4)(1.4)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges(1.4)(1.6)9.1
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments22.2
16.7
(0.9)
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments(12.6)(17.0)(4.1)
    
Balance at December 31(453.7)(414.3)(370.0)
    
TREASURY STOCK   
Balance at January 1(1,392.4)(1,094.4)(1,033.6)
Stock Options and Awards142.8
225.1
350.3
Stock Purchased(924.3)(523.1)(411.1)
    
Balance at December 31(2,173.9)(1,392.4)(1,094.4)
    
Total Stockholders’ Equity at December 31$10,508.3
$10,216.2
$9,770.4

(In Millions Except Per Share Information)PREFERRED STOCKCOMMON STOCKADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITALRETAINED EARNINGSACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)TREASURY STOCKTOTAL
Balance at January 1, 2018$882.0 $408.6 $1,047.2 $9,685.1 $(414.3)$(1,392.4)$10,216.2 
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income— — — 25.3 (25.3)— 
Change in Accounting Principle— — — (4.5)— — (4.5)
Net income— — — 1,556.4 — — 1,556.4 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Net of Tax and Reclassifications)— — — — (14.1)— (14.1)
Dividends Declared:
Common Stock, $1.94 per share— — — (439.1)— — (439.1)
Preferred Stock— — — (46.4)— — (46.4)
Stock Awards and Options Exercised— — 21.3 — — 142.8 164.1 
Stock Purchased— — — — — (924.3)(924.3)
Balance at December 31, 2018$882.0 $408.6 $1,068.5 $10,776.8 $(453.7)$(2,173.9)$10,508.3 
Net income— — — 1,492.2 — — 1,492.2 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Net of Tax and Reclassifications)— — — — 259.0 — 259.0 
Dividends Declared:
Common Stock, $2.60 per share— — — (565.9)— — (565.9)
Preferred Stock— — — (46.4)— — (46.4)
Issuance of Preferred Stock, Series E391.4 — — — — — 391.4 
Stock Awards and Options Exercised— — (55.4)— — 208.0 152.6 
Stock Purchased— — — — — (1,100.2)(1,100.2)
Balance at December 31, 2019$1,273.4 $408.6 $1,013.1 $11,656.7 $(194.7)$(3,066.1)$11,091.0 
Cumulative Effect Adjustment related to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-13— — — (10.1)— — (10.1)
Balance at January 1, 20201,273.4 408.6 1,013.1 11,646.6 (194.7)(3,066.1)11,080.9 
Net income— — — 1,209.3 — — 1,209.3 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Net of Tax and Reclassifications)— — — — 622.7 — 622.7 
Dividends Declared:
Common Stock, $2.80 per share— — — (592.0)— — (592.0)
Preferred Stock— — — (44.7)— — (44.7)
Redemption of Preferred Stock, Series C(388.5)— — (11.5)— — (400.0)
Stock Awards and Options Exercised— — (49.5)— — 161.4 111.9 
Stock Purchased— — — — — (299.8)(299.8)
Balance at December 31, 2020$884.9 $408.6 $963.6 $12,207.7 $428.0 $(3,204.5)$11,688.3 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements on pages 95-166.    

94-168.    



201892 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation93

Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
(In Millions)202020192018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income$1,556.4
$1,199.0
$1,032.5
Net Income$1,209.3 $1,492.2 $1,556.4 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Investment Security Losses, net1.0
1.6
3.2
Investment Security (Losses) Gains, netInvestment Security (Losses) Gains, net0.4 1.4 1.0 
Amortization and Accretion of Securities and Unearned Income, net95.9
105.0
100.9
Amortization and Accretion of Securities and Unearned Income, net88.9 64.6 95.9 
Provision for Credit Losses(14.5)(28.0)(26.0)Provision for Credit Losses125.0 (14.5)(14.5)
Depreciation on Buildings and Equipment108.6
101.2
89.2
Amortization of Computer Software334.9
309.1
275.3
Amortization of Intangibles17.4
11.4
8.8
Depreciation and AmortizationDepreciation and Amortization500.3 458.9 460.9 
Change in Accrued Income Taxes(130.0)36.2
(129.0)Change in Accrued Income Taxes25.4 (70.7)(130.0)
Pension Plan Contributions(74.5)(14.5)(12.8)Pension Plan Contributions(15.6)(6.1)(74.5)
Deferred Income Tax Provision10.5
(76.1)(175.8)Deferred Income Tax Provision16.4 34.3 10.5 
Change in Receivables(197.0)(119.3)(129.2)Change in Receivables4.5 (50.3)(197.0)
Change in Interest Payable28.5
10.7
(0.1)Change in Interest Payable(23.6)(23.6)28.5 
Change in Collateral With Derivative Counterparties, net(699.6)486.2
(180.4)Change in Collateral With Derivative Counterparties, net(17.8)1,154.0 (699.6)
Other Operating Activities, net729.9
(302.1)653.4
Other Operating Activities, net(16.4)(448.2)729.9 
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities1,767.5
1,720.4
1,510.0
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities1,896.8 2,592.0 1,767.5 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net Change in Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell105.7
678.9
(372.9)
Change in Federal Funds SoldChange in Federal Funds Sold5.0 129.0 (113.0)
Change in Securities Purchased under Agreements to ResellChange in Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell(700.9)357.3 218.7 
Change in Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks1,073.8
(467.7)1,906.1
Change in Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks712.6 (614.6)1,073.8 
Net Change in Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits9,679.6
(12,748.7)(4,124.2)Net Change in Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits(19,845.2)(3,683.2)9,679.6 
Purchases of Debt Securities – Held to Maturity(21,463.1)(11,955.2)(8,573.2)Purchases of Debt Securities – Held to Maturity(40,187.9)(14,154.3)(21,463.1)
Proceeds from Maturity and Redemption of Debt Securities – Held to Maturity20,036.7
9,924.8
4,026.5
Proceeds from Maturity and Redemption of Debt Securities – Held to Maturity35,658.6 16,290.9 20,036.7 
Purchases of Debt Securities – Available for Sale(12,596.9)(9,780.0)(14,741.9)Purchases of Debt Securities – Available for Sale(10,886.8)(12,811.0)(12,596.9)
Proceeds from Sale, Maturity and Redemption of Debt Securities – Available for Sale8,958.7
10,103.4
11,317.3
Proceeds from Sale, Maturity and Redemption of Debt Securities – Available for Sale8,748.2 11,057.2 8,958.7 
Change in Loans and Leases66.1
1,451.0
(471.0)Change in Loans and Leases(2,316.7)1,087.9 66.1 
Purchases of Buildings and Equipment(97.6)(91.6)(111.3)Purchases of Buildings and Equipment(135.8)(158.0)(97.6)
Purchases and Development of Computer Software(408.4)(381.2)(362.1)Purchases and Development of Computer Software(424.6)(441.8)(408.4)
Change in Client Security Settlement Receivables(49.7)(592.6)1,105.0
Change in Client Security Settlement Receivables(226.8)821.0 (49.7)
Acquisition of a Business, Net of Cash Received(104.2)(188.5)(16.9)Acquisition of a Business, Net of Cash Received0 (10.5)(104.2)
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Policy PremiumsBank-Owned Life Insurance Policy Premiums0 (1,500.0)
Other Investing Activities, net(873.6)25.8
226.5
Other Investing Activities, net(322.7)225.1 (873.6)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities4,327.1
(14,021.6)(10,192.1)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing ActivitiesNet Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities(29,923.0)(3,405.0)4,327.1 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Change in Deposits(6,163.2)8,523.6
6,737.4
Change in Deposits32,137.9 4,263.6 (6,163.2)
Change in Federal Funds Purchased308.1
2,081.2
(146.7)Change in Federal Funds Purchased(292.7)(2,041.3)308.1 
Change in Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase(665.2)360.5
(72.9)Change in Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase(450.0)320.9 (665.2)
Change in Short-Term Other Borrowings1,860.9
967.7
1,073.5
Change in Short-Term Other Borrowings(2,698.3)(1,184.5)1,860.9 
Proceeds from Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt497.9
350.0

Repayments of Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt(314.3)(208.7)(6.7)
Proceeds from Issuance of Preferred Stock - Series D

493.5
Redemption of Preferred Stock - Series CRedemption of Preferred Stock - Series C(400.0)
Proceeds from Senior NotesProceeds from Senior Notes993.2 498.0 497.9 
Repayments of Senior NotesRepayments of Senior Notes(508.6)(314.3)
Proceeds from Issuance of Preferred Stock - Series EProceeds from Issuance of Preferred Stock - Series E0 392.5 
Treasury Stock Purchased(924.3)(523.1)(411.1)Treasury Stock Purchased(299.8)(1,100.2)(924.3)
Net Proceeds from Stock Options32.6
108.0
233.8
Net Proceeds from Stock Options19.5 44.0 32.6 
Cash Dividends Paid on Common Stock(405.4)(356.8)(333.0)Cash Dividends Paid on Common Stock(584.6)(529.7)(405.4)
Cash Dividends Paid on Preferred Stock(46.4)(49.8)(23.4)Cash Dividends Paid on Preferred Stock(45.9)(46.4)(46.4)
Other Financing Activities, net1.1
0.1
(7.5)Other Financing Activities, net1.2 (1.0)1.1 
Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Financing Activities(5,818.2)11,252.7
7,536.9
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Financing ActivitiesNet Cash Provided by (Used In) Financing Activities27,871.9 615.9 (5,818.2)
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Rates on Cash(212.9)234.6
58.7
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Rates on Cash84.6 74.7 (212.9)
Change in Cash and Due from Banks63.5
(813.9)(1,086.5)Change in Cash and Due from Banks(69.7)(122.4)63.5 
Cash and Due from Banks at Beginning of Year4,518.1
5,332.0
6,418.5
Cash and Due from Banks at Beginning of Year4,459.2 4,581.6 4,518.1 
Cash and Due from Banks at End of Year$4,581.6
$4,518.1
$5,332.0
Cash and Due from Banks at End of Year$4,389.5 $4,459.2 $4,581.6 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest Paid$670.2
$328.8
$181.6
Interest Paid$226.8 $845.5 $670.2 
Income Taxes Paid493.5
441.2
754.2
Income Taxes Paid327.7 437.0 493.5 
Transfers from Loans to OREO11.4
8.2
14.2
Transfers from Loans to OREO0.2 3.5 11.4 
Transfers from Available for Sale to Held to MaturityTransfers from Available for Sale to Held to Maturity301.5 160.8 
Transfers to Leases Held For Sale from LeasesTransfers to Leases Held For Sale from Leases0 53.6 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements on pages 95-166.

94-168.
94   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation93


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and reporting practices prescribed for the banking industry. A description of the more significant accounting policies follows.

A. Basis of Presentation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Northern Trust Corporation (Corporation) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Northern Trust Company (Bank), and various other wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Corporation and Bank. Throughout the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the term “Northern Trust” refers to the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated statements of income include results of acquired subsidiaries from the dates of acquisition. Certain prior-year balances have been reclassified consistent with the current year’s presentation.

B. Nature of Operations. The Corporation is a bank holding company that has elected to be a financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Bank is an Illinois banking corporation headquartered in Chicago and the Corporation’s principal subsidiary. The Corporation conducts business in the United States (U.S.) and internationally through various U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries, including the Bank.
Northern Trust generates the majority of its revenue from its two2 client-focused reporting segments: Corporate & Institutional Services (C&IS) and Wealth Management. Asset management and related services are provided to C&IS and Wealth Management clients primarily by the Asset Management business.
C&IS is a leading global provider of asset servicing and related services to corporate and public retirement funds, foundations, endowments, fund managers, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, and other institutional investors around the globe. Asset servicing and related services encompass a full range of capabilities including but not limited to: global custody; fund administration; investment operations outsourcing; investment management; investment risk and analytical services; employee benefit services; securities lending; foreign exchange; treasury management; brokerage services; transition management services; banking and cash management. Client relationships are managed through the Bank and the Bank’s and the Corporation’s other subsidiaries, including support from locations in North America, Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region.
Wealth Management focuses on high-net-worth individuals and families, business owners, executives, professionals, retirees, and established privately-held businesses in its target markets. The business also includes the Global Family Office, which provides customized services to meet the complex financial needs of individuals and family offices in the U.S. and throughout the world with assets typically exceeding $200 million. In supporting these targeted segments, Wealth Management provides trust, investment management, custody, and philanthropic services; financial consulting; guardianship and estate administration; family business consulting; family financial education; brokerage services; and private and business banking. Wealth Management services are delivered by multidisciplinary teams through a network of offices in 1819 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., as well as offices in London, Guernsey, and Abu Dhabi.

C. Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in the application of certain of our significant accounting policies that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

D. Foreign Currency Remeasurement and Translation. Asset and liability accounts denominated in nonfunctional currencies are remeasured into functional currencies at period-end rates of exchange, except for certain balance sheet items including but not limited to buildings and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, which are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Results from remeasurement of asset and liability accounts are reported in other operating incomeOther Operating Income as currency translation gains (losses), net.net, on the consolidated statements of income. Income and expense accounts are remeasured at period-average rates of exchange.
Asset and liability accounts of entities with functional currencies that are not the U.S. dollar are translated at period-end rates of exchange. Income and expense accounts are translated at period-average rates of exchange. Translation adjustments, net of applicable taxes, are reported directly to accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), a component of stockholders’ equity.

E. Securities.Securities Available for Sale are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses credited or charged, net of the tax effect, to AOCI. Realized gains and losses on securities available for sale are determined on a specific identification basis and are reported within other security gains (losses)Investment Security Gains (Losses), net, inon the consolidated statements of

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 95

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

income. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis, adjusted for the amortization of premium and accretion of discount.



94 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Securities Held to Maturity consist of debt securities that management intends to, and Northern Trust has the ability to, hold until maturity. Such securities are reported at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis adjusted for the amortization of premium and accretion of discount.
Securities Held for Trading are statedreported at fair value. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on securities held for trading are reported inwithin Security Commissions and Trading Income on the consolidated statements of income within security commissions and trading income.
Nonmarketable Securities primarily consist of Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and Federal Home Loan Bank stock and community development investments, each of which are recorded in other assetsOther Assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and Federal Home Loan Bank stock are reported at cost, which represents redemption value. Community development investments are typically reported at amortized cost. Those community development investments that are designed to generate a return primarily through realization of tax credits and other tax benefits, which are discussed in further detail in Note 29, “Variable Interest Entities,” are reported at amortized cost using the effective yield method or proportional amortization method and amortized over the lives of the related tax credits and other tax benefits.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (OTTI). A security is considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected are less than the security’s amortized cost basis (the difference being defined as the credit loss) or if the fair value of the security is less than the security’s amortized cost basis and the investor intends, or more-likely-than-not will be required, to sell the security before recovery of the security’s amortized cost basis. If OTTI exists, the charge to earnings is limited to the amount of credit loss if the investor does not intend to sell the security, and it is more-likely-than-not that it will not be required to sell the security, before recovery of the security’s amortized cost basis. Any remaining difference between fair value and amortized cost is recognized in AOCI, net of applicable taxes. Otherwise, the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost is charged to earnings.

F. Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase. Northern Trust participates in the repurchase agreement market as a relatively low cost alternative for short-term funding. Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as collateralized financings and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were acquired or sold plus accrued interest. To minimize any potential credit risk associated with these transactions, the fair value of the securities purchased or sold is monitored, limits are set on exposure with counterparties, and the financial condition of counterparties is regularly assessed. It is Northern Trust’s policy to take possession, either directly or via third-party custodians, of securities purchased under agreements to resell. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are held by the counterparty until the repurchase.

G. Derivative Financial Instruments. Northern Trust is a party to various derivative financial instruments that are used in the normal course of business to meet the needs of its clients;clients, as part of its trading activity for its own account;account, and as part of its risk management activities. These instruments generally include foreign exchange contracts, interest rate contracts, total return swap contracts and credit default swap contracts. DerivativeAll derivative financial instruments, whether designated as hedges or not, are recorded at fair value within Other Assets and Other Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value within other assets and other liabilities.sheets. Derivative asset and liability positions with the same counterparty are reflected on a net basis on the consolidated balance sheets in cases where legally enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements exist. These derivative assets and liabilities are further reduced by cash collateral received from, and deposited with, derivative counterparties. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative inon the consolidated statements of income depends on whether or not the contract has been designated as a hedge and qualifies for hedge accounting under GAAP. Derivative financial instruments are recorded on the consolidated statements of cash flows within the line item, “other operating activities,Other Operating Activities, net, on the consolidated statement of cash flows, except for net investment hedges which are recorded within “other investing activities, net”.Other Investing Activities, net.
Changes in the fair value of client-related and trading derivative instruments, which are not designated hedges under GAAP, are recognized currently in either foreign exchange trading incomeForeign Exchange Trading Income or security commissionsSecurity Commissions and tradingTrading Income on the consolidated statements of income. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments entered into for risk management purposes but not designated as hedges are recognized currently in other operatingOther Operating Income on the consolidated statements of income. Certain derivative instruments used by Northern Trust to manage risk are formally designated and qualify for hedge accounting as fair value, cash flow, or net investment hedges.
Derivatives designated as fair value hedges are used to limit Northern Trust’s exposure to changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities due to movements in interest rates. Changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability attributable to the hedged risk are recognized currently in interest incomeInterest Income or interest expense.Interest Expense on the consolidated statements of income. For substantially all fair value hedges, Northern Trust applies the “shortcut” method of accounting, available under GAAP. As a result, changes recorded in the fair value of the hedged item are assumed to equal the offsetting gain or loss on the derivative. For fair value hedges that do not qualify for the “shortcut” method of accounting,

96   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Northern Trust utilizes regression analysis a “long-haul” method of accounting, in assessing whether these hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and quarterly thereafter.
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are used to minimize the variability in cash flows of earning assets or forecasted transactions caused by movements in interest or foreign exchange rates. Changes in the fair value of such derivatives are recognized in AOCI, a component of stockholders’ equity, and there is no change to the accounting for the hedged item. Balances in AOCI are reclassified to earnings when the hedged forecasted transaction impacts earnings, and are reflected in the same income statement line item. Northern Trust applies the “shortcut” method of accounting for cash flow hedges of certain available for sale investment securities. For cash flow hedges of certain other available for sale investment securities, foreign currency denominated investment securities, and forecasted foreign currency denominated revenue and expenditure transactions, Northern Trust closely matches all terms of the hedged item and hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis. For cash flow hedges of available for sale investment securities, to the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, effectiveness is assessed using regression analysis. For cash flow hedges of forecasted
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 95

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
foreign currency denominated revenue and expenditure transactions and investment securities, to the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, effectiveness is assessed using the dollar-offset method.
Foreign exchange contracts and qualifying non-derivative instruments designated as net investment hedges are used to minimize Northern Trust’s exposure to variability in the foreign currency translation of net investments in non-U.S. branches and subsidiaries. Changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument are recognized in AOCI consistent with the related translation gains and losses of the hedged net investment. For net investment hedges, all critical terms of the hedged item and the hedging instrument are matched at inception and on an ongoing basis. Amounts recorded in AOCI are reclassified to earnings only upon the sale or liquidation of an investment in a non-U.S. branch or subsidiary.
Fair value, cash flow, and net investment hedges are designated and formally documented as such contemporaneous with the transaction. The formal documentation describes the hedge relationship and identifies the hedging instruments and hedged items. Included in the documentation is a discussion of the risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking such hedges, the nature of the risk being hedged, and a description of the method for assessing hedge effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis. For hedges that do not qualify for the “shortcut” or the critical terms match methods of accounting, a formal assessment is performed on a calendar quarter basis to verify that derivatives used in hedging transactions continue to be highly effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. Hedge accounting is discontinued if a derivative ceases to be highly effective, matures, is terminated or sold, if a hedged forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, or if Northern Trust removes the derivative’s hedge designation. Subsequent gains and losses on these derivatives are included in foreign exchange trading incomeForeign Exchange Trading Income or security commissionsSecurity Commissions and tradingTrading Income on the consolidated statements of income. For discontinued cash flow hedges, the accumulated gain or loss on the derivative remains in AOCI and is reclassified to earnings in the period in which the previously hedged forecasted transaction impacts earnings or is no longer probable of occurring. For discontinued fair value hedges, the previously hedged asset or liability ceases to be adjusted for changes in its fair value. Previous adjustments to the hedged item are amortized over the remaining life of the hedged item.

H. Loans and Leases. Loans and leases are recognized assets that represent a contractual right to receive money either on demand or on fixed or determinable dates. Loans and leases are disaggregated for disclosure purposes by portfolio segment (segment) and by class. Northern Trust has defined its segments as commercial and personal. A class of loans and leases is a subset of a segment, the components of which hashave similar risk characteristics, measurement attributes, or risk monitoring methods. The classes within the commercial segment have been defined as commercial and institutional, commercial real estate, lease financing, net, non-U.S. and other. The classes within the personal segment have been defined as residential real estate, private client and other.
Loan Classification. Loans that are held for investment are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income. Loans classified as held for sale are reported at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. Undrawn commitments relating to loans that are not held for sale are recorded in other liabilitiesOther Liabilities and are carried at the amount of unamortized fees with an allowance for credit loss liability recognized for any estimated probableexpected losses.
Nonaccrual Loans and Recognition of Income. Interest income on loans and leases is recorded on an accrual basis unless, in the opinion of management, there is a question as to the ability of the debtor to meet the terms of the loan agreement, or interest or principal is more than 90 days contractually past due and the loan is not well-secured and in the process of collection. Loans meeting such criteria are classified as nonperformingnonaccrual and interest income is recorded on a cash basis. Past due status is based on how long since the contractual due date a principal or interest payment has been past due. For disclosure purposes, loans that are 29 days past due or less are reported as current. At the time a loan is determined to be nonperforming,nonaccrual, interest accrued but not collected is reversed against interest income in the current period. Interest collected on nonperformingnonaccrual loans is applied to principal unless, in the opinion of management, collectability of principal is not in doubt. Management’s assessment of indicators of loan and lease collectability, and its policies relative to the recognition of

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 97

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

interest income, including the suspension and subsequent resumption of income recognition, do not meaningfully vary between loan and lease classes. NonperformingNonaccrual loans are returned to performing status when factors indicating doubtful collectability no longer exist. Factors considered in returning a loan to performing status are consistent across all classes of loans and leases and, in accordance with regulatory guidance, relate primarily to expected payment performance. A loan is eligible to be returned to performing status when: (i) no principal or interest that is due is unpaid and repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected or (ii) the loan has otherwise become well-secured (possessing realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt, including accrued interest, in full) and is in the process of collection (through action reasonably expected to result in debt repayment or restoration to a current status in the near future). A loan that has not been brought fully current may be restored to performing status provided there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally a minimum of six payment periods) by the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms, and Northern Trust is reasonably assured of repayment within a reasonable period of time. Additionally, a loan that has been formally restructured so as to be reasonably assured of repayment and performance according to its modified terms may be returned to accrual status, provided there was a well-documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial



96 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
condition and prospects of repayment under the revised terms, and there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally a minimum of six payment periods) under the revised terms.
Impaired Loans.Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs). A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, management determines that it is probable that Northern Trust will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are identified through ongoing credit management and risk rating processes, including the formal review of past due and watch list credits. Payment performance and delinquency status are critical factors in identifying impairment for all loans and leases, particularly those within the residential real estate, private client and personal-other classes. Other key factors considered in identifying impairment of loans and leases within the commercial and institutional, lease financing, net, non-U.S., and commercial-other classes relate to the borrower’s ability to perform under the terms of the obligation as measured through the assessment of future cash flows, including consideration of collateral value, market value, and other factors. A loan is also considered to be impaired if its terms havehas been modified as a concession by Northern Trust or a bankruptcy court resulting from the debtor’s financial difficulties is referred to as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). All TDRs are reported as impaired loansTDRs starting in the calendar year of their restructuring. In subsequent years, a TDR may cease being reported as impaireda TDR if the loan was modified at a market rate and has performed according to the modified terms for at least six payment periods. A loan that has been modified at a below market rate will return to performingaccrual status if it satisfies the six payment periodssix-payment-period performance requirement; however, it will remain reported as impaired. Impairmentrequirement.
The expected credit loss is measured based upon the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's original effective interest rate based on the original contractual rate. If a loan’s contractual interest rate varies based on subsequent changes in an independent factor, such as an index or rate, the loan’s effective interest rate is calculated based on the factor as it changes over the life of the loan. Northern Trust elected not to project changes in the factor for purposes of estimating expected future cash flows. Further, Northern Trust elected not to adjust the effective interest rate for prepayments. If the loan is collateral dependent, the expected loss is measured based on the fair value of the collateral ifat the loan is collateral dependent, or the loan's observable market value. reporting date.
If the loan valuation is less than the recorded value of the loan, based on the certainty of loss, either a specifican allowance is established, or a charge-off is recorded, for the difference. Smaller balance (individually less than $1,000,000)$1 million) homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment and excluded from impaired loan disclosures as allowed under applicable accounting standards.evaluated. Northern Trust’s accounting policies for material impairednonaccrual loans is consistent across all classes of loans and leases.
All loans and leases with TDR modifications are evaluated for additional expected credit losses. The nature and extent of further deterioration in credit quality, including a subsequent default, is considered in the determination of an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses.
Collateral Dependent Financial Assets. A financial asset is collateral-dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the sale or operation of the collateral. Most of Northern Trust’s collateral dependent credit exposure relates to its residential real estate portfolio for which the collateral is usually the underlying real estate property. For collateral dependent financial assets, it is Northern Trust’s policy to reserve or charge-off the difference between the amortized cost basis of the loan and the value of the collateral.
Premium, Discounts, Origination Costs and Fees. Premiums and discounts on loans are recognized as an adjustment of yield using the interest method based on the contractual terms of the loan. Certain direct origination costs and fees are netted, deferred and amortized over the life of the related loan as an adjustment to the loan’s yield.
Direct Financing and Leveraged Leases. Unearned lease income from direct financing and leveraged leases is recognized using the interest method. This method provides a constant rate of return on the unrecovered investment over the life of the lease. The rate of return and the allocation of income over the lease term are recalculated from the inception of the lease if during the lease term assumptions regarding the amount or timing of estimated cash flows change. Lease residual values are established at the inception of the lease based on in-house valuations and market analyses provided by outside parties. Lease residual values are reviewed at least annually for OTTI. A decline in the estimated residual value of a leased asset determined to be other-than-temporary would be recorded in the period in which the decline is identified as a reduction of interest income.

I. Allowance for Credit Losses. The
2020 Allowance for Credit Losses after the Adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13
As of December 31, 2020, the allowance for credit losses represents management’s best estimate of probablelifetime expected credit losses which have occurred asrelated to various portfolios subject to credit risk, off-balance sheet credit exposure, and specific borrower relationships.
Northern Trust measures expected credit losses of financial assets with similar risk characteristics on a collective basis. A financial asset is measured individually if it does not share similar risk characteristics with other financial assets and the date of the consolidated financial statements. The loan and lease portfolio and other lending-related credit exposures are regularly reviewed to evaluate therelated allowance is determined through an individual evaluation.
Management’s estimates utilized in establishing an appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses.losses are not dependent on any single assumption. In determining an appropriate allowance level, management evaluates numerous variables, many of which are interrelated or dependent on other assumptions and estimates, and takes into consideration past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.
Forecasting and Reversion. Estimating expected lifetime credit losses requires the consideration of the effect of future economic conditions. Northern Trust evaluatesemploys multiple scenarios over a reasonable and supportable period to project future conditions. Management determines the allowance necessaryprobability weights assigned to each scenario at each quarter-end. Key variables determined to be relevant for impaired loansprojecting credit losses on the portfolios in scope include macroeconomic factors, such as corporate profits, unemployment, and lending-related commitmentsreal estate price indices, as well as financial market factors such as equity prices, volatility, and also estimates losses inherent in other lending-related credit exposures. spreads. For periods beyond the reasonable and supportable period, Northern Trust reverts to its own historical loss experiences.
Allowance for Loans and Leases. The allowance estimation methodology for the collective assessment is primarily based on internally developed loss data specific to the Northern Trust financial asset portfolio from a historical observation
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 97

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
period that includes both expansionary and recessionary periods. The estimation methodology and the related qualitative adjustment framework segregate the loan and lease portfolio into homogeneous segments based on similar risk characteristics or risk monitoring methods.
Northern Trust utilizes a quantitative probability of default/loss given default approach for the calculation of its credit losses consistsallowance on a collective basis. For each of the following components:different parameters, specific credit models for the individual loan segments were developed. For each segment, the probability of default and the loss given default are applied to the exposure at default for each projected quarter to determine the quantitative component of the allowance. The quantitative allowance is then reviewed within a qualitative adjustment framework, through which management applies judgment by assessing internal risk factors, potential limitations in the quantitative methodology, and environmental factors that are not fully contemplated in the forecast to compute an adjustment to the quantitative allowance for each segment of the loan portfolio.
Specific Allowance.The specific allowance related to credit exposure evaluated on an individual basis is determined through an individual evaluation of loans, leases, and lending-related commitments considered impaired that is based on expected future cash flows, the value of collateral, and other

98   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

factors that may impact the borrower’s ability to pay. For impaired loans wherefor which the amount of specific allowance, if any, is determined based on the value of the underlying real estate collateral, third-party appraisals are typically obtained and utilized by management. These appraisals are generally less than twelve months old and are subject to adjustments to reflect management’s judgment as to the realizable value of the collateral.
Inherent Allowance. The inherent allowance estimation methodology is based on internally developed loss data specific to the Northern Trust loan and lease portfolio. The estimation methodology and the related qualitative adjustment framework segregate the loan and lease portfolio into homogeneous segments. For each segment, the probability of default and the loss given default are applied to the total exposure at default to determine a quantitative inherent allowance. The quantitative inherent allowance is then reviewed within the qualitative adjustment framework, where management applies judgment by assessing internal risk factors, potential limitations in the quantitative methodology and environmental factors that are not fully contemplated in the quantitative methodology to compute an adjustment to the quantitative inherent allowance for each segment of the loan portfolio.
The results of the inherent allowance estimation methodology are reviewed quarterly by Northern Trust’s Loan Loss Reserve Committee, which includes representatives from Credit Risk Management, reporting segment management, and Corporate Finance.
Loans, leases, and other extensions of credit deemed uncollectible are charged to the allowance for credit losses. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Northern Trust’s policies relative to the charging-off of uncollectible loans and leases are consistent across both loan and lease segments. Determinations as to whether loan balances for which the collectability is in question are charged-off or a specific reserve is established are based on management’s assessment as to the level of certainty regarding the amount of loss. The provision for credit losses, which is charged to income, is the amount necessary to adjust the allowance for credit losses to the level determined to be appropriate through the above processes. Actual losses may vary from current estimates and the amount of the provision for credit losses may be either greater or less than actual net charge-offs.
Northern Trust analyzes its exposure to credit losses from both on-balance-sheeton-balance sheet and off-balance-sheetoff-balance sheet activity using a consistent methodology.methodology for the quantitative framework as well as the qualitative framework.
ForAs of December 31, 2020, for purposes of estimating the allowance for credit losses for undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit, the exposure at default includes an estimated drawdown of unused credit based on credit utilization factors, resulting in a proportionate amount of expected credit losses.
Allowance for HTM Securities.Debt securities held to maturity classified as U.S. government, government sponsored agency, and certain securities classified as obligations of states and political subdivisions are considered to be guarantees of the U.S. government or an agency of the U.S. government and therefore an allowance for credit losses is not estimated for such investments as the expected probability of non-payment of the amortized cost basis is zero.
Debt securities held to maturity classified as other asset-backed represent pools of underlying receivables from which the cash flows are used to pay the bonds that vary in seniority. Utilizing a qualitative estimation approach, the allowance for other asset-backed securities is assessed by evaluating underlying pool performance based on delinquency rates and available credit support.
Debt securities held to maturity classified as other relates to investments purchased by Northern Trust to fulfill its obligations under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). Northern Trust fulfills its obligations under the CRA by making qualified investments for purposes of supporting institutions and programs that benefit low-to-moderate income communities within Northern Trust’s market area. The allowance for CRA investments is assessed using a qualitative estimation approach primarily based on internal historical performance experience and default history of the underlying CRA portfolios to determine a quantitative component of the allowance.
The allowance estimation methodology for all other debt securities held to maturity is developed using a combination of external and internal data. The estimation methodology groups securities with shared characteristics for which the probability of default and the loss given default are applied to the total exposure at default to determine a quantitative component of the allowance.
Allowance for Available for Sale Securities.Securities available for sale impairment reviews are conducted quarterly to identify and evaluate securities that have indications of possible credit losses. A determination as to whether a security’s decline in market value is related to credit impairment takes into consideration numerous factors and the relative significance of any single factor can vary by security. Factors Northern Trust considers in determining whether impairment is credit related include, but are not limited to, the severity of the impairment; the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; activity in the market of the issuer, which may indicate adverse credit conditions; Northern Trust’s intent regarding the sale of the security as of the balance sheet date; and the likelihood that Northern Trust will not be required to sell the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for the recovery of the security’s amortized cost basis. For each security meeting the requirements of Northern Trust’s internal screening process, an extensive review is conducted to determine if a credit loss has occurred that is then based on the best estimate of cash flows to be collected from the security, discounted using the security’s effective interest rate. If the present value of the expected cash flows is found to be less than the current amortized cost of the security, an allowance for credit losses is generally recorded equal to the difference between the two amounts, limited to the amount the amortized cost basis exceeds the fair value of the security.
Allowance for Other Financial Assets. The allowance for other financial assets consists of the allowance for those other financial assets presented in Cash and Due from Banks, Other Central Bank Deposits, Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks, Federal Funds Sold, and Other Assets. The Other Assets category includes other miscellaneous credit exposures reported in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The allowance estimation methodology for other financial



98 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
assets primarily utilizes a similar approach as used for the debt securities held to maturity portfolio. It consists of a combination of externally and internally developed loss data, adjusted for the appropriate contractual term. Northern Trust’s portfolio is composed mostly of institutions within the “1 to 3” internal borrower rating category and expected to exhibit minimal to modest likelihood of loss.
The portion of the allowance assigned to loans and leases, debt securities held to maturity, and other financial assets is presented as a contra asset in Allowance for Credit Losses on the consolidated balance sheets. The portion of the allowance assigned to undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit is reported in Other Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The allowance for AFS securities is presented parenthetically with the amortized cost basis of AFS securities on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Provision for Credit Losses on the consolidated statements of income represents the change in the Allowance for Credit Losses on the consolidated balance sheets and is the charge to current period earnings. It represents the amount needed to maintain the Allowance for Credit Losses on the consolidated balance sheets at an appropriate level to absorb lifetime expected credit losses related to financial assets in scope. Actual losses may vary from current estimates and the amount of the Provision for Credit Losses may be either greater than or less than actual net charge-offs.
Contractual Term. Northern Trust estimates expected credit losses over the contractual term of the financial assets adjusted for prepayments, unless prepayments are not relevant to specific portfolios or sub-portfolios. Extension and renewal options are typically not considered since it is not Northern Trust’s practice to enter into arrangements where the borrower has the unconditional option to renew, or a conditional extension option whereby the conditions are beyond Northern Trust’s control.
Accrued Interest. Northern Trust elected not to measure an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivables related to its loan and securities portfolios as its policy is to write-off uncollectible accrued interest receivable balances in a timely manner. Accrued interest is written off by reversing interest income during the quarter the financial asset is moved from an accrual to a nonaccrual status.
2019 Allowance for Credit Losses prior to the Adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13
Allowance for Loans and Leases under the Previous “Incurred Loss” Model. As of December 31, 2019, the Allowance for Credit Losses represented management’s estimate of probable losses which occurred as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. The loan and lease portfolio and other lending-related credit exposures were regularly reviewed to evaluate the level of the Allowance for Credit Losses. In determining an appropriate allowance level, Northern Trust evaluated the allowance necessary for impaired loans and lending-related commitments and also estimated losses inherent in other lending-related credit exposures. The allowance for credit losses consisted of the following components:
Specific Allowance. A loan was considered to be impaired when, based on existing information and events, management determined that it was probable that Northern Trust would be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans were identified through ongoing credit management and risk rating processes, including the formal review of past due and watch list credits. Payment performance and delinquency status were critical factors in identifying impairment for all loans and leases, particularly those within the residential real estate, private client and personal-other classes. Other key factors considered in identifying impairment of loans and leases within the commercial and institutional, lease financing, net, non-U.S., and commercial-other classes related to the borrower’s ability to perform under the terms of the obligation as measured through the assessment of future cash flows, including consideration of collateral value, market value, and other factors. The specific allowance was determined through an individual evaluation of loans and lending-related commitments considered impaired that was based on expected future cash flows, the value of collateral, and other factors that may impact the borrower’s ability to pay. For impaired loans where the amount of specific allowance, if any, was determined based on the value of the underlying real estate collateral, third-party appraisals were typically obtained and utilized by management. These appraisals were generally less than twelve months old and were subject to adjustments to reflect management’s judgment as to the realizable value of the collateral.
Inherent Allowance. The inherent allowance estimation methodology was based on internally developed loss data specific to the Northern Trust loan and lease portfolio. The estimation methodology and the related qualitative adjustment framework segregated the loan and lease portfolio into homogeneous segments. For each segment, the probability of default and the loss given default were applied to the total exposure at default to determine a quantitative inherent allowance. The quantitative inherent allowance was then reviewed within the qualitative adjustment framework, where management applied judgment by assessing internal risk factors, potential limitations in the quantitative methodology and environmental factors that were not fully contemplated in the quantitative methodology to compute an adjustment to the quantitative inherent allowance for each segment of the loan portfolio.
The results of the inherent allowance estimation methodology were reviewed quarterly by Northern Trust’s Loan Loss Reserve Committee, which included representatives from Credit Risk Management, reporting segment management, and Corporate Finance.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 99

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Loans, leases, and other extensions of credit deemed uncollectible were charged to the Allowance for Credit Losses. Subsequent recoveries, if any, were credited to the allowance. Northern Trust’s policies relative to the charging-off of uncollectible loans and leases were consistent across both loan and lease segments. Determinations as to whether loan balances for which the collectability was in question were charged-off or a specific reserve was established were based on management’s assessment as to the level of certainty regarding the amount of loss. The Provision for Credit Losses, which was charged to income, was the amount necessary to adjust the allowance for credit losses to the level determined to be appropriate through the above processes.
As of December 31, 2019, for purposes of estimating the allowance for credit losses for undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit, the exposure at default included an estimated drawdown of unused credit based on a credit conversion factor. The proportionate amount of the quantitative methodology calculation after any required adjustment in the qualitative framework resultsresulted in the required allowance for undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit as of the reporting date.
The portion of the allowance assigned to loans and leases iswas reported as a contra asset, directly following loans and leases in the consolidated balance sheets. The portion of the allowance assigned to undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit iswas reported in other liabilities inOther Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (OTTI) related to Securities. As of December 31, 2019, a security was considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected was less than the security’s amortized cost basis (the difference being defined as the credit loss) or if the fair value of the security was less than the security’s amortized cost basis and the investor intended, or more-likely-than-not would have been required, to sell the security before recovery of the security’s amortized cost basis. If OTTI existed, the charge to earnings was limited to the amount of credit loss if the investor did not intend to sell the security, and it was more-likely-than-not that it would not have been required to sell the security, before recovery of the security’s amortized cost basis. Any remaining difference between fair value and amortized cost was recognized in AOCI, net of applicable taxes. Otherwise, the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost was charged to earnings.
J. Standby Letters of Credit. Fees on standby letters of credit are recognized in other operatingOther Operating Income on the consolidated statements of income using the straight-line method over the lives of the underlying agreements. Northern Trust’s recorded other liability for standby letters of credit, reflecting the obligation it has undertaken, is measured as the amount of unamortized fees on these instruments.

K. Buildings and Equipment. Buildings and equipment owned are carried at original cost less accumulated depreciation. The charge for depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on the following range of lives: buildings – up to 30 years; equipment – 3 to 10 years; and leasehold improvements–improvements – the shorter of the lease term or 15 years. Leased properties meeting certain criteria are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the lease period.

L. Other Real Estate Owned (OREO). OREO is comprised of commercial and residential real estate properties acquired in partial or total satisfaction of loans. OREO assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell and are recorded in other assetsOther Assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Fair value is typically based on third-party appraisals. Appraisals of OREO properties are updated on an annual basis and are subject to adjustments to reflect management’s judgment as to the realizable value of the properties. Losses identified during the 90-day period after the acquisition of such properties are charged against the allowanceAllowance for credit lossesCredit Losses assigned to loansLoans and leases.Leases. Subsequent write-downs that may be required to the carrying value of these assets and gains or losses realized from asset sales are recorded within other operating expense.Other Operating Expense on the consolidated statements of income.

M. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill is not subject to amortization. Separately identifiable acquired intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives, primarily on a straight-line basis. Purchased software, software licenses, and allowable internal costs, including compensation relating to software developed

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 99

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for internal use, are capitalized. Software is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally ranging from 3 to 10 years. Fees paid for the use of software licensesservices that aredo not hosted by Northern Trustconvey a software license are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill and other intangible assets are reviewed for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.

N. Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees. Trust, investment and other servicing fees are recorded on an accrual basis, over the period in which the service is provided. Fees are primarily a function of the market value of assets custodied, managed and serviced, transaction volumes, and securities lending volume and spreads, as set forth in the underlying client agreement. This revenue recognition involves the use of estimates and assumptions, including components that are calculated based on estimated asset valuations and transaction volumes.

O. Client Security Settlement Receivables. These receivables result from custody client withdrawals from short-term investment funds that settle on the following business day as well as custody client security sales executed under



100 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
contractual settlement date accounting that have not yet settled. Northern Trust advances cash to the client on the date of either client withdrawal or trade execution and awaits collection from either the short-term investment funds or via the settled trade.

P. Income Taxes. Northern Trust follows an asset and liability approach to account for income taxes. The objective is to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year, and to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from temporary differences between the amounts reported in the financial statements and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. The measurement of tax assets and liabilities is based on enacted tax laws and applicable tax rates.
Tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return are evaluated based on their likelihood of being sustained upon examination by tax authorities. Only tax positions that are considered more-likely-than-not to be sustained are recorded inon the consolidated financial statements. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets if it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion will not be realized. Northern Trust recognizes any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provisionProvision for income taxes.Income Taxes on the consolidated statements of income.

Q. Cash Flow Statements. Cash and cash equivalents have been defined as “Cash and Due from Banks”. on the consolidated balance sheets.

R. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits. Northern Trust records the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on the consolidated balance sheets. Funded pension and postretirement benefits are reported in other assetsOther Assets and unfunded pension and postretirement benefits are reported in other liabilities.Other Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Plan assets and benefit obligations are measured annually at December 31. Plan assets are determined based on fair value generally representing observable market prices. The projected benefit obligations are determined based on the present value of projected benefit distributions at an assumed discount rate. Pension costs are recognized ratably over the estimated working lifetime of eligible participants.

S. Share-Based Compensation Plans. Northern Trust recognizes as compensation expense the grant-date fair value of stock and stock unit awards and other share-based compensation granted to employees withinas Compensation on the consolidated statements of income. The fair values of stock and stock unit awards, including performance stock unit awards and director awards, are based on the closing price of the Corporation’s stock on the date of grant adjusted for certain awards that do not accrue dividends while vesting. The fair value of stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The model utilizes weighted-average assumptions regarding the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding (expected term) based primarily on the historical exercise behavior attributable to previous option grants, the estimated yield from dividends paid on the Corporation’s stock over the expected term of the options, the historical volatility of Northern Trust’s stock price and the implied volatility of traded options on Northern Trust stock, and a risk free interest rate based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant for a period equal to the expected term of the options granted.
Compensation expense for share-based award grants with terms that provide for a graded vesting schedule, whereby portions of the award vest in increments over the requisite service period, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Compensation expense for performance stock unit awards are recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award based on expected achievement of the performance condition. Adjustments are made for employees that meet certain eligibility criteria at the grant date or during the requisite service period.
Northern Trust does not include an estimate of future forfeitures in its recognition of share-based compensation expense. Share-based compensation expense is adjusted based on forfeitures as they occur. Dividend equivalents are paid on a current basis for restricted stock units granted prior to February 21, 2017 that are not yet vested. Dividend equivalents

100   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

are accrued for performance stock unit awards, most restricted stock units granted on or after February 21, 2017 and director awards not yet vested, and are paid upon vesting. Certain restricted stock units granted on or after February 20, 2018 are not entitled to dividend equivalents during the vesting period. Cash flows resulting from the realization of excess tax benefits are classified as operating cash flows on the consolidated statements of cash flows.

T. Net Income Per Common Share. Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income/loss applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock and potential common shares by the aggregate of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and common share equivalents calculated for stock options outstanding using the treasury stock method. In a period of a net loss, diluted net income per common share is calculated in the same manner as basic net income per common share.
Northern Trust has issued certain restricted stock unit awards, which are unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. These units are considered participating securities.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 101

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accordingly, Northern Trust calculates net income applicable to common stock using the two-class method, whereby net income is allocated between common stock and participating securities.
Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2018,2020, Northern Trust adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13). ASU 2016-13 significantly changed the way impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of financial instruments. The main provisions of ASU 2016-13 include (1) replacing the “incurred loss” approach under current GAAP with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost, (2) requiring entities to record an allowance for available for sale debt securities rather than reduce the carrying amount of the investments, as is required by the other-than-temporary-impairment model under legacy GAAP, and (3) a simplified accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans.
Upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, Northern Trust recorded a $13.7 million increase in the allowance for credit losses with a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment to decrease retained earnings by $10.1 million, net of income taxes, on January 1, 2020. Northern Trust did not restate comparative periods for the effects of applying ASU 2016-13. There was no significant impact to Northern Trust’s consolidated statements of income. Please refer to Note 7 — Allowance for Credit Losses for further information.
On January 1, 2020, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 606)”350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (ASU 2014-09). The primary objective of ASU 2014-09 is revenue recognition that represents the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Northern Trust adopted ASU 2014-09 using the modified retrospective method applied to contracts not yet completed as of the date of adoption. Results for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2018 are presented under ASU 2014-09, including certain changes to gross versus net presentation, whereas prior period amounts are not adjusted. The impact of adopting ASU 2014-09 resulted in a $4.0 million reduction in retained earnings. Please refer to Note 17 - “Revenue from Contracts with Clients” for further information.
On January 1, 2018, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (ASU 2016-01)2017-04). ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under2017-04 amends the equity method or those thatsubsequent measurement of goodwill whereby Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test is eliminated. As a result, in consolidation) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income unless a policy electionthe goodwill impairment test is made for investments without readily determinable fair values. Additionally, ASU 2016-01 requires public entities to use the exit price notion when measuringperformed by comparing the fair value of financial instrumentsa reporting unit to its carrying value and an impairment charge should be recognized for disclosure purposes and eliminates the requirement to discloseamount by which the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimatecarrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, not to exceed the total amount of financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. Furthermore, it requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or in the accompanying notesgoodwill allocated to the financial statements. The impact of adopting ASU 2016-01 resulted in a $0.5 million reduction in retained earnings.
On January 1, 2018, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (ASU 2016-15). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues, thereby reducing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows.that reporting unit. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-15,2017-04, there was no significant impact to Northern Trust’s consolidated statementbalance sheets or consolidated statements of cash flows.income.
On January 1, 2018,2020, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 740)820): Intra-Entity TransfersDisclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement” (ASU 2018-13). The primary objective of Assets Other Than Inventory” (ASU 2016-16). ASU 2016-16 requires an entity2018-13 is to recognizeimprove the income tax consequenceseffectiveness of intra-entity transfers of assets (excluding inventory)disclosures in the period in which the transfer occurs.notes to financial statements. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-16,2018-13, there was no significant impact to Northern Trust’s consolidated financial conditionbalance sheets or resultsconsolidated statements of operations.income.
On January 1, 2018,2020, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)2018-15, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Restricted CashCustomer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (ASU 2016-18)2018-15). ASU 2016-18 requires2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an entity to include amounts generally described as restricted cash and cash equivalents with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning and end of period total cash balances in the statement of cash flows and as a result, transfers between cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents, will not be presented in the statement of cash flows as cash flow activities. Additionally, if the balance sheet includes more than one line item for cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash and cash equivalents, an entity is required to disclose a reconciliation between the balance sheet and the statement of cash flows. Furthermore, if restricted cash and cash equivalents are material, an entity must disclose information about the nature of restrictions.internal use software license). Upon adoption of ASU 2016-18,2018-15, there was no significant impact to Northern Trust’s consolidated statementbalance sheets or consolidated statements of cash flows.income.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 101

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On January 1, 2018,2020, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations2018-17, “Consolidation (Topic 805)810): ClarifyingTargeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities” (ASU 2018-17). ASU 2018-17 requires that indirect interests held through related parties in common control arrangements be considered on a proportional basis (rather than as the Definitionequivalent of a Business” (ASU 2017-01). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidancedirect interest in its entirety) for determining whether fees paid to assist companies with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assetsdecision makers and activities is a business.service providers are variable interests. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-01,2018-17, there was no significant impact to Northern Trust’s consolidated financial conditionbalance sheets or resultsconsolidated statements of operations.income.
On JanuaryApril 1, 2018,2020, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20)2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets” (ASU 2017-05). ASU 2017-05 clarifies that an in substance nonfinancial asset is an asset or group of assets for which substantially allFacilitation of the fair value consistsEffects of nonfinancial assetsReference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting” (ASU 2020-04). The global transition toward alternative reference rates and away from referencing the group or subsidiaryLondon Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and other interbank offered rates (Reference Rate Reform) is notexpected to have a business. Transfers of nonfinancial assets to another entity in exchange for a noncontrolling ownership interest in that entity will be accounted for under Accounting Standards Codification 610-20 - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets. ASU 2017-05 also impacts the accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial assets, and provides that when an entity transfers its controlling financial interest in a nonfinancial asset, but retains a noncontrolling ownership interest, the entity will measure the retained interest at fair value. This will result in full gain or loss recognition upon the sale of a controlling interest in a nonfinancial asset. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-05, there was no significant impact to Northern Trust’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
On January 1, 2018, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost” (ASU 2017-07). Under previous GAAP, net benefit cost on pension and postretirement benefit plans included multiple components, including current-period employee service cost, interest cost on the obligation,volume of contract modifications, hedge accounting, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected return on plan assets,to be discontinued because of Reference Rate Reform. ASU 2020-04 provides temporary optional expedients and amortization of various amounts deferred from previous periods. ASU 2017-07 requires the bifurcation of the net benefit costexceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by presenting separately the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost. Northern Trust provides a detailed breakdown of its net periodic pension costs components including a reference to the respective income statement line in the footnotes and therefore there were no changes to the presentation of net periodic pension costs in the results of operations upon adoption of ASU 2017-07.
On January 1, 2018, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting” (ASU 2017-09). ASU 2017-09 clarifies which types of changes to share-based payment awardsReference Rate Reform if certain criteria are in scope of modification accounting. ASU 2017-09 also provides clarification related to the fair value assessment with respect to determining whether a fair value calculation is required and the appropriate unit of account to apply. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-09, there was no impact to Northern Trust’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
On January 1, 2018, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2018-02, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (ASU 2018-02). The amendments in ASU 2018-02 allow an entity to elect to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. ASU 2018-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, however early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2018-02 may be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. Upon adoption of ASU 2018-02, Northern Trust elected to reclassify $25.3 million of income tax effects from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. In the normal course, it is Northern Trust’s policy to release income tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income on an aggregate portfolio basis. Please refer to Note 15 - “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)” for further information.
On April 1, 2018, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities” (ASU 2017-12).met. The main provisions of ASU 2017-122020-04 provide the following optional expedients: (1) simplification of the accounting evaluations under current GAAP for contract modifications, including loan, debt, lease and other contracts with potential embedded derivatives, if qualifying criteria are intended to align better an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting formet (2) preservation of hedging relationships throughwithout dedesignation upon certain changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifyingcritical terms of an existing hedging relationships. ASU 2017-12 eliminates the requirementrelationship due to measure and report hedge ineffectiveness separately and generally requires the entire change in the fair value of a hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. Further, ASU 2017-12 eases certain documentation and assessment requirements and modifies the accounting for components excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Northern Trust currently applies the “shortcut” method of accounting available under US GAAP for substantially all fair value hedgesReference Rate Reform and other aspects of Northern Trust’s currentoptional hedge accounting programrelief provisions and therefore upon adoption of ASU 2017-12, there was no significant impact(3) a one-time election to Northern Trust’s consolidated financial conditionsell or results of operations.
On December 31, 2018, Northern Trust adopted ASU No. 2018-14, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Topic 715-20): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans” (ASU 2018-14). ASU 2018-14 improves the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements by removing,

transfer, or both sell and



102  2018 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

transfer, debt securities classified as held to maturity that reference a rate affected by Reference Rate Reform and are classified as held to maturity before January 1, 2020.
modifyingThe optional expedients in ASU 2020-04 for contract modifications and addinghedging relationships are applied prospectively, while the one-time election to sell or transfer, or both sell and transfer debt securities classified as held to maturity may be made at any time after March 12, 2020. The optional expedients and exceptions provided by ASU 2020-04 do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, except for hedging relationships existing as of December 31, 2022 for which an entity has elected certain disclosures related to defined benefit pension,optional expedients and other postretirement plans. which are retained through the end of the hedging relationship.Upon adoption of ASU 2018-14,2020-04, there was no significant impact toon Northern Trust’s consolidated financial conditionbalance sheets or resultsconsolidated statements of operations. Please referincome. Northern Trust expects to Note 22 - “Employee Benefits”elect the optional expedients provided in ASU 2020-04 and does not expect a significant impact on Northern Trust’s consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of income as a result of electing such expedients.
On January 7, 2021, Northern Trust retrospectively adopted ASU No. 2021-01, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope” (ASU 2021-01). ASU 2021-01 clarifies the scope of Topic 848 to explicitly include those derivative instruments affected by changes in interest rates used for further information.margining, discounting, or contract price alignment as eligible for certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848. Upon adoption of ASU 2021-01, Northern Trust elected the expedients provided in Topic 848 with no significant impact on Northern Trust’s consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of income.
Note 3 – Fair Value Measurements
Fair value under GAAP is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

Fair Value Hierarchy. The following describes the hierarchy of valuation inputs (Levels 1, 2, and 3) used to measure fair value and the primary valuation methodologies used by Northern Trust for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity; unobservable inputs reflect the entity’s own assumptions about how market participants would value an asset or liability based on the best information available. GAAP requires an entity measuring fair value to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and establishes a fair value hierarchy of inputs. Financial instruments are categorized within the hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to their valuation. Northern Trust’s policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of fair value levels as of the end of the reporting period in which the transfer occurred. No transfers between fair value levelsinto or out of Level 3 occurred during the years ended December 31, 2018,2020, or 2017.2019.
Level 1 – Quoted, active market prices for identical assets or liabilities. Northern Trust’s Level 1 assets are comprised of available for sale investments in U.S. treasuryTreasury securities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted active market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in inactive markets, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets. Northern Trust’s Level 2 assets include available for sale and trading account debt securities, the fair values of which are determined predominantly by external pricing vendors. Prices received from vendors are compared to other vendor and third-party prices. If a security price obtained from a pricing vendor is determined to exceed pre-determined tolerance levels that are assigned based on an asset type’s characteristics, the exception is researched and, if the price is not able to be validated, an alternate pricing vendor is utilized, consistent with Northern Trust’s pricing source hierarchy. As of December 31, 2018,2020, Northern Trust’s available for sale debt securities portfolio included 1,4792,260 Level 2 securities with an aggregate market value of $31.7$39.2 billion. All 1,4792,260 debt securities were valued by external pricing vendors. As of December 31, 2017,2019, Northern Trust’s available for sale debt securities portfolio included 1,4361,704 Level 2 debt securities with an aggregate market value of $28.0$34.3 billion. All 1,4361,704 debt securities were valued by external pricing vendors. Trading account debt securities, which totaled $0.3$0.5 million and $0.5$0.3 million as of December 31, 2018,2020 and December 31, 2017,2019, respectively were all valued using external pricing vendors.
Northern Trust has established processes and procedures to assess the suitability of valuation methodologies used by external pricing vendors, including reviews of valuation techniques and assumptions used for selected securities. On a daily basis, periodic quality control reviews of prices received from vendors are conducted which include comparisons to prices on similar security types received from multiple pricing vendors and to the previous day’s reported prices for each security. Predetermined tolerance level exceptions are researched and may result in additional validation through available market information or the use of an alternate pricing vendor. Quarterly, Northern Trust reviews documentation from third-party pricing vendors regarding the valuation processes and assumptions used in their valuations and assesses whether the fair value levels assigned by Northern Trust to each security classification are appropriate. Annually, valuation inputs used within third-party pricing vendor valuations are reviewed for propriety on a sample basis through a comparison of inputs used to comparable market data, including security classifications that are less actively traded and security classifications comprising significant portions of the portfolio.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 103

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Level 2 assets and liabilities also include derivative contracts which are valued internally using widely accepted income-based models that incorporate inputs readily observable in actively quoted markets and reflect the contractual terms of the contracts. Observable inputs include foreign exchange rates and interest rates for foreign exchange contracts; credit spreads, default probabilities, and recovery rates for credit default swap contracts; interest rates for interest rate swap contracts and forward contracts; and interest rates and volatility inputs for interest rate option contracts. Northern Trust evaluates the impact of counterparty credit risk and its own credit risk on the valuation of its derivative instruments. Factors considered include the likelihood of default by Northern Trust and its counterparties, the remaining maturities of the instruments, net exposures after giving effect to master netting arrangements or similar agreements, available collateral, and other credit enhancements in determining the appropriate fair value of derivative instruments. The resulting valuation adjustments have not been considered material.
Level 3 – Valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable in the marketplace. Northern Trust’s Level 3 assets consisted of auction rate securities purchased in 2008 from Northern Trust clients. To

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 103

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

estimate the fair value of auction rate securities, Northern Trust uses external pricing vendors that incorporate transaction details and market-based inputs such as past auction results, trades and bids. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement are the prices of the securities supported by little market activity and for which trading is limited.
Northern Trust’s Level 3 liabilities consist of swaps that Northern Trust entered into with the purchaser of 1.1 million and 1.0 million shares of Visa Inc. Class B common stock (Visa Class B common shares) previously held by Northern Trust and sold in June 2016 and 2015, respectively. Pursuant to the swaps, Northern Trust retains the risks associated with the ultimate conversion of the Visa Class B common shares into shares of Visa Inc. Class A common stock (Visa Class A common shares), such that the counterparty will be compensated for any dilutive adjustments to the conversion ratio and Northern Trust will be compensated for any anti-dilutive adjustments to the ratio. The swapswaps also requiresrequire periodic payments from Northern Trust to the counterparty calculated by reference to the market price of Visa Class A common shares and a fixed rate of interest. The fair value of the swapswaps is determined using a discounted cash flow methodology. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement are Northern Trust’s own assumptions about estimated changes in the conversion rate of the Visa Class B common shares into Visa Class A common shares, the date on which such conversion is expected to occur and the estimated growth rate of the Visa Class A common share price. See “Visa Class B Common Shares” under Note 25 — “Contingent26, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” for further information.
Northern Trust believes its valuation methods for its assets and liabilities carried at fair value are appropriate; however, the use of different methodologies or assumptions, particularly as applied to Level 3 assets and liabilities, could have a material effect on the computation of their estimated fair values.
Management of various businesses and departments of Northern Trust (including Corporate Market Risk, Credit Risk Management, Corporate Finance, C&IS and Wealth Management) reviews valuation methods and models for Level 3 assets and liabilities. Fair value measurements are performed upon acquisitions of an asset or liability. Management of the appropriate business or department reviews assumed inputs, especially when unobservable in the marketplace, in order to substantiate their use in each fair value measurement. When appropriate, management reviews forecasts used in the valuation process in light of other relevant financial projections to understand any variances between current and previous fair value measurements. In certain circumstances, third party information is used to support the fair value measurements. If certain third party information seems inconsistent with consensus views, a review of the information is performed by management of the respective business or department to determine the appropriate fair value of the asset or liability.
The following table presents the fair values of Northern Trust’s Level 3 assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, as well as the valuation techniques, significant unobservable inputs, and quantitative information used to develop significant unobservable inputs for such assets and liabilities as of such dates.

TABLE 46: LEVEL 3 SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS
 DECEMBER 31, 2018
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTFAIR VALUE
VALUATION TECHNIQUEUNOBSERVABLE INPUTRANGE OF INPUTS
Swaps Related to Sale of Certain
Visa Class B Common Shares
$32.8 millionDiscounted Cash FlowVisa Class A Appreciation7.0%11.0%
   Conversion Rate1.62x1.64x
   Expected Duration1.5
4.0 years
 DECEMBER 31, 2017
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTFAIR VALUE
VALUATION TECHNIQUEUNOBSERVABLE INPUTRANGE OF INPUTS
Auction Rate Securities$4.3 millionComparablesPrice$92$100
Swap Related to Sale of Certain Visa Class B Common Shares$29.7 millionDiscounted Cash FlowVisa Class A Appreciation7.0%11.0%
   Conversion Rate1.63x1.65x
   Expected Duration1.5
4.0 years






104  2018 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE 55: LEVEL 3 SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS
DECEMBER 31, 2020
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTFAIR VALUEVALUATION TECHNIQUEUNOBSERVABLE INPUTSINPUT VALUES
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE INPUT VALUES(1)
Swaps Related to Sale of Certain Visa Class B Common Shares$35.3 millionDiscounted Cash FlowConversion Rate1.62x1.62x
Visa Class A Appreciation8.73%8.73%
Expected Duration12-33 months20 months
(1) Weighted average of expected duration based on scenario probability.
DECEMBER 31, 2019
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTFAIR VALUEVALUATION TECHNIQUEUNOBSERVABLE INPUTSINPUT VALUES
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE INPUT VALUES(1)
Swaps Related to Sale of Certain Visa Class B Common Shares$33.4 millionDiscounted Cash FlowConversion Rate1.62x1.62x
Visa Class A Appreciation8.54%8.54%
Expected Duration12-36 months22 months
(1) Weighted average of expected duration based on scenario probability.
The following presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, segregated by fair value hierarchy level.


TABLE 47:56: RECURRING BASIS HIERARCHY LEVELING
DECEMBER 31, 2018DECEMBER 31, 2020
(In Millions)LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
NETTING
ASSETS/
LIABILITIES
AT FAIR
VALUE

(In Millions)LEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3NETTINGASSETS/
LIABILITIES
AT FAIR
VALUE
Debt Securities  Debt Securities
Available for Sale  Available for Sale
U.S. Government$5,185.3 $
$
$
$5,185.3
U.S. Government$2,799.9 $0 $0 $ $2,799.9 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions 655.9


655.9
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions0 3,083.6 0  3,083.6 
Government Sponsored Agency 22,424.6


22,424.6
Government Sponsored Agency0 24,956.7 0  24,956.7 
Non-U.S. Government 142.2


142.2
Non-U.S. Government0 714.0 0  714.0 
Corporate Debt 2,294.7


2,294.7
Corporate Debt0 2,539.6 0  2,539.6 
Covered Bonds 829.3


829.3
Covered Bonds0 553.1 0  553.1 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds 2,096.2


2,096.2
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds0 2,345.8 0  2,345.8 
Other Asset-Backed 2,657.7


2,657.7
Other Asset-Backed0 3,997.5 0  3,997.5 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed 587.2


587.2
Commercial Mortgage-Backed0 1,031.8 0  1,031.8 
Other 15.7


15.7
  
Total Available for Sale5,185.3 31,703.5


36,888.8
Total Available for Sale2,799.9 39,222.1 0  42,022.0 
  
Trading Account 0.3


0.3
Trading Account0 0.5 0  0.5 
  
Total Available for Sale and Trading Debt Securities5,185.3 31,703.8


36,889.1
Total Available for Sale and Trading Debt Securities2,799.9 39,222.6 0  42,022.5 
  
Other Assets  Other Assets
Derivative Assets  Derivative Assets
Foreign Exchange Contracts 2,466.1


2,466.1
Foreign Exchange Contracts0 4,260.7 0 (3,505.3)755.4 
Interest Rate Contracts 96.1


96.1
Interest Rate Contracts0 297.5 0 (2.5)295.0 
Other Financial Derivatives (1)
 1.3


1.3
  
Total Derivative Assets 2,563.5

(1,357.1)1,206.4
Total Derivative Assets0 4,558.2 0 (3,507.8)1,050.4 
  
Other Liabilities  Other Liabilities
Derivative Liabilities  Derivative Liabilities
Foreign Exchange Contracts 2,262.5


2,262.5
Foreign Exchange Contracts0 4,722.5 0 (2,718.6)2,003.9 
Interest Rate Contracts 93.1


93.1
Interest Rate Contracts0 125.0 0 (98.5)26.5 
Other Financial Derivatives (2)
 
32.8

32.8
  
Other Financial Derivatives(1)
Other Financial Derivatives(1)
0 0 35.3 0 35.3 
Total Derivative Liabilities$ $2,355.6
$32.8
$(1,796.3)$592.1
Total Derivative Liabilities$0 $4,847.5 $35.3 $(2,817.1)$2,065.7 
Note: Northern Trust has elected to net derivative assets and liabilities when legally enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements exist between Northern Trust and the counterparty. As of December 31, 2018,2020, derivative assets and liabilities shown above also include reductions of $134.5$1,867.8 million and $573.7$1,177.2 million, respectively, as a result of cash collateral received from and deposited with derivative counterparties.
(1) This line consists of a total return swap contract.
(2) This line consists of swaps related to the sale of certain Visa Class B common shares.


20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 105

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2017DECEMBER 31, 2019
(In Millions)LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
NETTING
ASSETS/
LIABILITIES
AT FAIR
VALUE

(In Millions)LEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3NETTINGASSETS/
LIABILITIES
AT FAIR
VALUE
Debt Securities  Debt Securities
Available for Sale  Available for Sale
U.S. Government$5,700.3 $
$
$
$5,700.3
U.S. Government$4,549.1 $$$— $4,549.1 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions 746.4


746.4
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions1,615.3 — 1,615.3 
Government Sponsored Agency 18,676.6


18,676.6
Government Sponsored Agency23,271.2 — 23,271.2 
Non-U.S. Government 177.2


177.2
Non-U.S. Government3.3 — 3.3 
Corporate Debt 2,993.0


2,993.0
Corporate Debt2,402.7 — 2,402.7 
Covered Bonds 875.6


875.6
Covered Bonds769.9 — 769.9 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds 1,820.0


1,820.0
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds2,127.6 — 2,127.6 
Other Asset-Backed 2,291.3


2,291.3
Other Asset-Backed3,330.5 — 3,330.5 
Auction Rate 
4.3

4.3
Commercial Mortgage Backed 435.1


435.1
Commercial Mortgage Backed797.7 — 797.7 
Other 22.3


22.3
Other9.0 — 9.0 
Total Available for Sale5,700.3 28,037.5
4.3

33,742.1
Total Available for Sale4,549.1 34,327.2 — 38,876.3 
  
Trading Account 0.5


0.5
Trading Account0.3 — 0.3 
  
Total Available for Sale and Trading Debt Securities5,700.3 28,038.0
4.3

33,742.6
Total Available for Sale and Trading Debt Securities4,549.1 34,327.5 — 38,876.6 
  
Other Assets  Other Assets
Derivative Assets  Derivative Assets
Foreign Exchange Contracts 2,557.1


2,557.1
Foreign Exchange Contracts3,234.8 (2,334.1)900.7 
Interest Rate Contracts 97.0


97.0
Interest Rate Contracts152.9 (3.9)149.0 
Other Financial Derivative(1) 



Total Derivatives Assets 2,654.1

(1,860.0)794.1
Total Derivatives Assets3,387.7 (2,338.0)1,049.7 
   
Other Liabilities  Other Liabilities
Derivative Liabilities  Derivative Liabilities
Foreign Exchange Contracts 2,715.1


2,715.1
Foreign Exchange Contracts3,182.2 (1,548.6)1,633.6 
Interest Rate Contracts 83.5


83.5
Interest Rate Contracts97.4 (57.3)40.1 
Other Financial Derivative (1)
 0.7
29.7

30.4
33.4 (12.5)20.9 
Total Derivative Liabilities$ $2,799.3
$29.7
$(1,621.4)$1,207.6
Total Derivative Liabilities$$3,279.6 $33.4 $(1,618.4)$1,694.6 
Note: Northern Trust has elected to net derivative assets and liabilities when legally enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements exist between Northern Trust and the counterparty. As of December 31, 2017,2019, derivative assets and liabilities shown above also include reductions of $427.6$1,136.8 million and $189.0$417.2 million, respectively, as a result of cash collateral received from and deposited with derivative counterparties.
(1) This line consists of swaps related to the sale of certain Visa Class B common shares and a total return swap contract.shares.



106   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The following tables presenttable presents the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


TABLE 48:57: CHANGES IN LEVEL 3 ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
LEVEL 3 LIABILITIESSWAPS RELATED TO SALE OF CERTAIN VISA CLASS B
COMMON SHARES
(In Millions)20202019
Fair Value at January 1$33.4 $32.8 
Total (Gains) Losses:
Included in Earnings(1)
18.3 17.1 
Purchases, Issues, Sales, and Settlements
Settlements(16.4)(16.5)
Fair Value at December 31$35.3 $33.4 
Unrealized Losses (Gains) Included in Earnings Related to Financial Instruments Held at December 31(1)
$18.6 $12.3 
LEVEL 3 ASSETSAUCTION RATE SECURITIES 
(In Millions)2018
2017
Fair Value at January 1$4.3
$4.7
Total Gains (Losses):  
Included in Other Comprehensive Income (1)
0.1
0.2
Purchases, Issues, Sales, and Settlements  
Settlements(4.4)(0.6)
   
Fair Value at December 31$
$4.3

(1) Unrealized gains (losses) are included in net unrealized gains (losses) on debt securities available for sale, within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

LEVEL 3 LIABILITIES
SWAPS RELATED TO SALE OF CERTAIN VISA CLASS B
COMMON SHARES
 
(In Millions)2018
2017
Fair Value at January 1$29.7
$25.2
Total (Gains) Losses:  
Included in Earnings (1)
19.8
12.7
Purchases, Issues, Sales, and Settlements  
Settlements(16.7)(8.2)
Fair Value at December 31$32.8
$29.7
Unrealized (Gains) Losses Included in Earnings Related to Financial Instruments Held at December 31 (1)
$13.3
$11.4

(1) Gains (losses) are recorded in other operating income (expense) withinOther Operating Income on the consolidated statements of income.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 there were no assets or liabilities transferred into or out of Level 3.
Carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis may be adjusted to fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition, for example, to record an impairment of an asset. GAAP requires entities to separately disclose these subsequent fair value measurements and to classify them under the fair value hierarchy.




106 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, all of which were categorized as Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy, were comprised of impairednonaccrual loans whose values were based on real estate and other available collateral, and of OREO properties.
Fair values of real estate loan collateral were estimated using a market approach typically supported by third-party valuations and property-specific fees and taxes, andtaxes. The fair values of real estate loan collateral were subject to adjustments to reflect management’s judgment as to realizable value.value and consisted of discount factors ranging from 15.0% to 20.0% with a weighted average based on fair values of 16.8% and 15.3% as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Other loan collateral, which typically consists of accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, is valued using a market approach adjusted for asset specificasset-specific characteristics and in limited instances third-party valuations are used. OREO assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell, with fair value typically based on third-party appraisals.
Collateral-based impairednonaccrual loans and OREO assets that have been adjusted to fair value totaled $24.9$24.6 million and $0.4$8.0 million respectively, at December 31, 2018,2020 and $12.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis reflect management’s judgment as to realizable value.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 107

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2019, respectively.
The following table presents the fair values of Northern Trust’s Level 3 assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, as well as the valuation technique, significant unobservable inputs, and quantitative information used to develop the significant unobservable inputs for such assets as of such dates.


TABLE 49:58: LEVEL 3 NONRECURRING BASIS SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS
 DECEMBER 31, 2020
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT
FAIR VALUE(1)
VALUATION 
TECHNIQUE
UNOBSERVABLE INPUTSINPUT VALUESWEIGHTED-AVERAGE INPUT VALUES
Loans$24.6 millionMarket ApproachDiscount factor applied to real estate collateral-based loans to reflect realizable value15.0%20.0%16.8%
(1) Includes real estate collateral-based loans and other collateral-based loans.
 DECEMBER 31, 2019
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT
FAIR VALUE(1)
VALUATION 
TECHNIQUE
UNOBSERVABLE INPUTSINPUT VALUESWEIGHTED-AVERAGE INPUT VALUES
Loans$8.0 millionMarket ApproachDiscount factor applied to real estate collateral-based loans to reflect realizable value15.0%20.0%15.3%
(1) Includes real estate collateral-based loans and other collateral-based loans.

 DECEMBER 31, 2018
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTFAIR VALUEVALUATION TECHNIQUEUNOBSERVABLE INPUTRANGE OF DISCOUNTS APPLIED
Loans$24.9 millionMarket ApproachDiscount to reflect realizable value15.0%30.0%
OREO$0.4 millionMarket ApproachDiscount to reflect realizable value15.0%30.0%
 DECEMBER 31, 2017
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTFAIR VALUEVALUATION TECHNIQUEUNOBSERVABLE INPUTRANGE OF DISCOUNTS APPLIED
Loans$12.2 millionMarket ApproachDiscount to reflect realizable value15.0%25.0%
OREO$0.3 millionMarket ApproachDiscount to reflect realizable value15.0%20.0%


108   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation107


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables summarize the fair values of all financial instruments.


TABLE 50:59: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2020
FAIR VALUE
(In Millions)BOOK VALUETOTAL
FAIR VALUE
LEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3
ASSETS
Cash and Due from Banks$4,389.5 $4,389.5 $4,389.5 $0 $0 
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits55,503.6 55,503.6 0 55,503.6 0 
Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks4,372.6 4,372.6 0 4,372.6 0 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell1,596.5 1,596.5 0 1,596.5 0 
Debt Securities
Available for Sale(1)
42,022.0 42,022.0 2,799.9 39,222.1 0 
Held to Maturity17,791.1 17,797.4 90.0 17,707.4 0 
Trading Account0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0 
Loans (excluding Leases)
Held for Investment33,558.0 34,017.5 0 0 34,017.5 
Client Security Settlement Receivables1,160.2 1,160.2 0 1,160.2 0 
Other Assets
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock275.0 275.0 0 275.0 0 
Community Development Investments919.6 919.6 0 919.6 0 
Employee Benefit and Deferred Compensation215.8 228.9 138.6 90.3 0 
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Demand, Noninterest-Bearing, Savings, Money Market and Other Interest-Bearing$71,742.5 $71,742.5 $71,742.5 $0 $0 
Savings Certificates and Other Time937.1 943.0 0 943.0 0 
Non U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing71,198.4 71,198.4 0 71,198.4 0 
Federal Funds Purchased260.2 260.2 0 260.2 0 
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase39.8 39.8 0 39.8 0 
Other Borrowings4,011.5 4,012.7 0 4,012.7 0 
Senior Notes3,122.4 3,222.6 0 3,222.6 0 
Long-Term Debt
Subordinated Debt1,189.3 1,250.1 0 1,250.1 0 
Floating Rate Capital Debt277.8 264.6 0 264.6 0 
Other Liabilities
Standby Letters of Credit22.4 22.4 0 0 22.4 
Loan Commitments77.0 77.0 0 0 77.0 
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
Asset/Liability Management
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Assets$15.6 $15.6 $0 $15.6 $0 
Liabilities311.8 311.8 0 311.8 0 
Interest Rate Contracts
Assets8.3 8.3 0 8.3 0 
Liabilities10.2 10.2 0 10.2 0 
Other Financial Derivatives
Liabilities(2)
35.3 35.3 0 0 35.3 
Client-Related and Trading
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Assets4,245.1 4,245.1 0 4,245.1 0 
Liabilities4,410.7 4,410.7 0 4,410.7 0 
Interest Rate Contracts
Assets289.2 289.2 0 289.2 0 
Liabilities114.8 114.8 0 114.8 0 
 DECEMBER 31, 2018
   FAIR VALUE
(In Millions)BOOK VALUE
TOTAL
FAIR VALUE

LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
ASSETS     
Cash and Due from Banks$4,581.6
$4,581.6
$4,581.6
$
$
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits30,080.2
30,080.2

30,080.2

Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks4,264.2
4,264.2

4,264.2

Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell1,165.2
1,165.2

1,165.2

Debt Securities     
Available for Sale (Note)
36,888.8
36,888.8
5,185.3
31,703.5

Held to Maturity14,354.0
14,267.0
101.6
14,165.4

Trading Account0.3
0.3

0.3

Loans (excluding Leases)     
Held for Investment32,287.0
32,339.2


32,339.2
Held for Sale




Client Security Settlement Receivables1,646.1
1,646.1

1,646.1

Other Assets     
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock300.3
300.3

300.3

Community Development Investments606.6
606.6

606.6

Employee Benefit and Deferred Compensation202.3
194.5
125.0
69.5

LIABILITIES     
Deposits     
Demand, Noninterest-Bearing, Savings and Money Market$37,340.1
$37,340.1
$37,340.1
$
$
Savings Certificates and Other Time688.7
691.8

691.8

Non U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing66,468.0
66,468.0

66,468.0

Federal Funds Purchased2,594.2
2,594.2

2,594.2

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase168.3
168.3

168.3

Other Borrowings7,901.7
7,904.1

7,904.1

Senior Notes2,011.3
1,994.4

1,994.4

Long-Term Debt     
Subordinated Debt1,112.4
1,089.7

1,089.7

Floating Rate Capital Debt277.6
253.5

253.5

Other Liabilities     
Standby Letters of Credit28.0
28.0


28.0
Loan Commitments139.9
139.9


139.9
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS     
Asset/Liability Management     
Foreign Exchange Contracts     
Assets$306.7
$306.7
$
$306.7
$
Liabilities72.5
72.5

72.5

Interest Rate Contracts     
Assets30.0
30.0

30.0

Liabilities24.5
24.5

24.5

Other Financial Derivatives     
Assets (1)
1.3
1.3

1.3

Liabilities (2)
32.8
32.8


32.8
Client-Related and Trading     
Foreign Exchange Contracts     
Assets2,159.4
2,159.4

2,159.4

Liabilities2,190.0
2,190.0

2,190.0

Interest Rate Contracts     
Assets66.1
66.1

66.1

Liabilities68.6
68.6

68.6

Note:(1) Refer to the table located on pagepage 105 for the disaggregation of available for sale debt securities.
(1) This line consists of a total return swap contract.
(2) This line consists of swaps related to the sale of certain Visa Class B common shares.





2018108 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation109

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2019
FAIR VALUE
(In Millions)BOOK VALUETOTAL
FAIR VALUE
LEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3
ASSETS
Cash and Due from Banks$4,459.2 $4,459.2 $4,459.2 $$
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits33,886.0 33,886.0 33,886.0 
Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks4,877.1 4,877.1 4,877.1 
Federal Funds Sold5.0 5.0 5.0 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell707.8 707.8 707.8 
Debt Securities
Available for Sale(1)
38,876.3 38,876.3 4,549.1 34,327.2 
Held to Maturity12,284.5 12,249.3 138.8 12,110.5 
Trading Account0.3 0.3 0.3 
Loans (excluding Leases)
Held for Investment31,239.5 31,517.8 31,517.8 
Client Security Settlement Receivables845.7 845.7 845.7 
Other Assets
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock301.2 301.2 301.2 
Community Development Investments749.3 749.3 749.3 
Employee Benefit and Deferred Compensation199.5 207.6 131.0 76.6 
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Demand, Noninterest-Bearing, Savings, Money Market and Other Interest-Bearing$47,733.6 $47,733.6 $47,733.6 $$
Savings Certificates and Other Time986.7 994.2 994.2 
Non U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing60,400.3 60,400.3 60,400.3 
Federal Funds Purchased552.9 552.9 552.9 
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase489.7 489.7 489.7 
Other Borrowings6,744.8 6,745.9 6,745.9 
Senior Notes2,573.0 2,593.0 2,593.0 
Long-Term Debt
Subordinated Debt1,148.1 1,169.5 1,169.5 
Floating Rate Capital Debt277.7 262.1 262.1 
Other Liabilities
Standby Letters of Credit25.5 25.5 25.5 
Loan Commitments32.3 32.3 32.3 
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
Asset/Liability Management
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Assets$83.1 $83.1 $$83.1 $
Liabilities24.1 24.1 24.1 
Interest Rate Contracts
Assets20.5 20.5 20.5 
Liabilities21.1 21.1 21.1 
Other Financial Derivatives
Liabilities(2)
33.4 33.4 33.4 
Client-Related and Trading
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Assets3,151.7 3,151.7 3,151.7 
Liabilities3,158.1 3,158.1 3,158.1 
Interest Rate Contracts
Assets132.4 132.4 132.4 
Liabilities76.3 76.3 76.3 
 DECEMBER 31, 2017

  FAIR VALUE
(In Millions)BOOK VALUE
TOTAL
FAIR VALUE

LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
ASSETS     
Cash and Due from Banks$4,518.1
$4,518.1
$4,518.1
$
$
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits40,479.1
40,479.1

40,479.1

Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks5,611.9
5,611.9

5,611.9

Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell1,324.3
1,324.3

1,324.3

Debt Securities     
Available for Sale (Note)
33,742.1
33,742.1
5,700.3
28,037.5
4.3
Held to Maturity13,049.0
13,010.9
35.0
12,975.9

Trading Account0.5
0.5

0.5

Loans (excluding Leases)     
Held for Investment32,211.1
32,375.8


32,375.8
Held for Sale20.9
20.9


20.9
Client Security Settlement Receivables1,647.0
1,647.0

1,647.0

Other Assets     
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock223.1
223.1

223.1

Community Development Investments415.3
415.3

415.3

Employee Benefit and Deferred Compensation183.4
181.5
115.5
66.0

LIABILITIES     
Deposits     
Demand, Noninterest-Bearing, Savings and Money Market$45,566.3
$45,566.3
$45,566.3
$
$
Savings Certificates and Other Time1,152.3
1,153.6

1,153.6

Non U.S. Offices Interest-Bearing65,672.2
65,672.2

65,672.2

Federal Funds Purchased2,286.1
2,286.1

2,286.1

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase834.0
834.0

834.0

Other Borrowings6,051.1
6,052.9

6,052.9

Senior Notes1,497.3
1,528.4

1,528.4

Long-Term Debt (excluding Leases)     
Subordinated Debt1,435.1
1,449.8

1,449.8

Floating Rate Capital Debt277.5
260.0

260.0

Other Liabilities     
Standby Letters of Credit30.3
30.3


30.3
Loan Commitments33.1
33.1


33.1
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS     
Asset/Liability Management     
Foreign Exchange Contracts     
Assets$30.1
$30.1
$
$30.1
$
Liabilities192.6
192.6

192.6

Interest Rate Contracts     
Assets31.9
31.9

31.9

Liabilities19.4
19.4

19.4

Other Financial Derivatives     
Assets




Liabilities (1)
30.4
30.4

0.7
29.7
Client-Related and Trading     
Foreign Exchange Contracts     
Assets2,527.0
2,527.0

2,527.0

Liabilities2,522.5
2,522.5

2,522.5

Interest Rate Contracts     
Assets65.1
65.1

65.1

Liabilities64.1
64.1

64.1


Note:(1) Refer to the table located on page 106 for the disaggregation of available for sale debt securities.
(1) (3) This line consists of swaps related to the sale of certain Visa Class B common shares and a total return swap contract.shares.



110   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation109


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 – Securities
Debt Securities Available for Sale. The following tables provide the amortized cost, fair values, and remaining maturities of debt securities available for sale.


TABLE 51:60: RECONCILIATION OF AMORTIZED COST TO FAIR VALUE OF DEBT SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
DECEMBER 31, 2020
(In Millions)AMORTIZED
COST
GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS
GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
FAIR
VALUE
U.S. Government$2,728.8 $71.1 $0 $2,799.9 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions2,927.8 155.9 0.1 3,083.6 
Government Sponsored Agency24,595.1 388.5 26.9 24,956.7 
Non-U.S. Government713.6 1.1 0.7 714.0 
Corporate Debt2,459.9 79.8 0.1 2,539.6 
Covered Bonds543.1 10.0 0 553.1 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds2,281.7 64.7 0.6 2,345.8 
Other Asset-Backed3,953.5 46.8 2.8 3,997.5 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed952.2 79.7 0.1 1,031.8 
Total$41,155.7 $897.6 $31.3 $42,022.0 
DECEMBER 31, 2018DECEMBER 31, 2019
(In Millions)
AMORTIZED
COST

GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

(In Millions)AMORTIZED
COST
GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS
GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
FAIR
VALUE
U.S. Government$5,203.1
$21.8
$39.6
$5,185.3
U.S. Government$4,527.5 $26.7 $5.1 $4,549.1 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions657.6
2.0
3.7
655.9
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions1,604.0 24.6 13.3 1,615.3 
Government Sponsored Agency22,522.7
52.4
150.5
22,424.6
Government Sponsored Agency23,247.5 101.8 78.1 23,271.2 
Non-U.S. Government143.3

1.1
142.2
Non-U.S. Government3.3 3.3 
Corporate Debt2,312.6
3.2
21.1
2,294.7
Corporate Debt2,378.9 27.8 4.0 2,402.7 
Covered Bonds832.7
1.4
4.8
829.3
Covered Bonds766.3 4.4 0.8 769.9 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds2,087.8
11.9
3.5
2,096.2
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds2,091.3 37.4 1.1 2,127.6 
Other Asset-Backed2,678.9
1.7
22.9
2,657.7
Other Asset-Backed3,324.5 11.3 5.3 3,330.5 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed587.4
4.0
4.2
587.2
Commercial Mortgage-Backed769.9 28.7 0.9 797.7 
Other15.7


15.7
Other9.0 9.0 
 
Total$37,041.8
$98.4
$251.4
$36,888.8
Total$38,722.2 $262.7 $108.6 $38,876.3 

 DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In Millions)
AMORTIZED
COST

GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

U.S. Government$5,714.4
$18.0
$32.1
$5,700.3
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions749.9

3.5
746.4
Government Sponsored Agency18,745.3
39.9
108.6
18,676.6
Non-U.S. Government179.1

1.9
177.2
Corporate Debt3,013.7
2.2
22.9
2,993.0
Covered Bonds879.0
1.0
4.4
875.6
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds1,819.8
4.0
3.8
1,820.0
Other Asset-Backed2,297.7
1.5
7.9
2,291.3
Auction Rate4.4

0.1
4.3
Commercial Mortgage-Backed439.2

4.1
435.1
Other22.3


22.3
     
Total$33,864.8
$66.6
$189.3
$33,742.1

TABLE 52:61: REMAINING MATURITY OF DEBT SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
 DECEMBER 31, 2018DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In Millions)
AMORTIZED
COST
 
FAIR
VALUE

AMORTIZED
COST
 
FAIR
VALUE

Due in One Year or Less$9,206.2 $9,162.8
$6,249.5 $6,227.0
Due After One Year Through Five Years21,012.7 20,943.9
20,017.2 19,937.8
Due After Five Years Through Ten Years5,774.1 5,740.8
6,545.3 6,535.1
Due After Ten Years1,048.8 1,041.3
1,052.8 1,042.2
     
Total$37,041.8 $36,888.8
$33,864.8 $33,742.1

DECEMBER 31, 2020ONE YEAR OR LESSONE TO FIVE YEARSFIVE TO TEN YEARSOVER TEN YEARSTOTAL
(In Millions)Amortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair Value
U.S. Government$300.9 $303.2 $1,732.8 $1,767.0 $695.1 $729.7 $0 $0 $2,728.8 $2,799.9 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions7.9 8.0 252.1 266.8 2,578.4 2,718.4 89.4 90.4 2,927.8 3,083.6 
Government Sponsored Agency5,540.0 5,613.6 8,942.2 9,063.0 7,682.1 7,793.6 2,430.8 2,486.5 24,595.1 24,956.7 
Non-U.S. Government414.3 414.6 40.6 40.8 258.7 258.6 0 0 713.6 714.0 
Corporate Debt443.5 448.6 2,016.4 2,091.0 0 0 0 0 2,459.9 2,539.6 
Covered Bonds108.2 108.6 434.9 444.5 0 0 0 0 543.1 553.1 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds163.9 164.1 1,960.8 2,024.0 157.0 157.7 0 0 2,281.7 2,345.8 
Other Asset-Backed517.4 525.9 2,903.1 2,937.8 436.0 436.8 97.0 97.0 3,953.5 3,997.5 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed12.0 12.1 413.5 441.2 526.7 578.5 0 0 952.2 1,031.8 
Total$7,508.1 $7,598.7 $18,696.4 $19,076.1 $12,334.0 $12,673.3 $2,617.2 $2,673.9 $41,155.7 $42,022.0 
Note: Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are included in the above table taking into account anticipated future prepayments.






2018110 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation111

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Debt Securities Available for Sale with Unrealized Losses. The following table provides information regarding debt securities available for sale with no credit losses reported that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and for twelve months or longer as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
TABLE 62: DEBT SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE IN UNREALIZED LOSS POSITION WITH NO CREDIT LOSSES REPORTED
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020LESS THAN 12 MONTHS12 MONTHS OR LONGERTOTAL
(In Millions)FAIR
VALUE
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
FAIR
VALUE
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
FAIR
VALUE
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions$52.3 $0.1 $0 $0 $52.3 $0.1 
Government Sponsored Agency2,402.3 13.6 2,528.7 13.3 4,931.0 26.9 
Non-U.S. Government90.5 0.7 0 0 90.5 0.7 
Corporate Debt66.6 0.1 0 0 66.6 0.1 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds162.8 0.5 49.9 0.1 212.7 0.6 
Other Asset-Backed176.8 0.2 792.3 2.6 969.1 2.8 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed44.4 0.1 0 0 44.4 0.1 
Total$2,995.7 $15.3 $3,370.9 $16.0 $6,366.6 $31.3 
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2019LESS THAN 12 MONTHS12 MONTHS OR LONGERTOTAL
(In Millions)FAIR
VALUE
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
FAIR
VALUE
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
FAIR
VALUE
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
U.S. Government$252.2 $2.8 $899.7 $2.3 $1,151.9 $5.1 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions902.4 13.3 902.4 13.3 
Government Sponsored Agency5,405.0 35.6 7,818.4 42.5 13,223.4 78.1 
Corporate Debt279.3 1.1 492.7 2.9 772.0 4.0 
Covered Bonds138.7 0.7 25.0 0.1 163.7 0.8 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds217.5 1.0 155.2 0.1 372.7 1.1 
Other Asset-Backed592.4 1.8 1,164.9 3.5 1,757.3 5.3 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed62.8 0.7 59.3 0.2 122.1 0.9 
Total$7,850.3 $57.0 $10,615.2 $51.6 $18,465.5 $108.6 
As of December 31, 2020, 412 debt securities available for sale with a combined fair value of $6.4 billion were in an unrealized loss position, with their unrealized losses totaling $31.3 million. Unrealized losses related to debt securities available for sale of $26.9 million and $2.8 million related to government sponsored agency and other asset-backed securities, respectively, are primarily attributable to changes in market interest rates and credit spreads since their purchase. As of December 31, 2020, 16% of the corporate debt securities available for sale portfolio were backed by guarantees provided by U.S. and non-U.S. governmental entities. The remaining unrealized losses on Northern Trust’s debt securities available for sale portfolio as of December 31, 2020 are attributable to changes in overall market interest rates or credit spreads.
As of December 31, 2020, Northern Trust did not intend to sell any debt securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position and it was more likely than not that Northern Trust would not be required to sell any such investment before the recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity.
There was 0 provision for corporate debt securities available for sale for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 0 allowance for credit losses for corporate debt securities available for sale as of December 31, 2020.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 111

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Debt Securities Held to Maturity. The following tables provide the amortized cost, fair values and remaining maturities of debt securities held to maturity.


TABLE 53:63: RECONCILIATION OF AMORTIZED COST TO FAIR VALUES OF DEBT SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
DECEMBER 31, 2020
(In Millions)AMORTIZED
COST
GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS
GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
FAIR
VALUE
U.S. Government$90.0 $0 $0 $90.0 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions2.1 0.1 0 2.2 
Government Sponsored Agency3.0 0.3 0 3.3 
Non-U.S. Government8,336.6 7.3 0.2 8,343.7 
Corporate Debt588.0 6.5 0.1 594.4 
Covered Bonds3,184.6 24.6 0.3 3,208.9 
Certificates of Deposit807.2 0 0 807.2 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds3,648.0 43.5 0.9 3,690.6 
Other Asset-Backed677.0 0.9 0 677.9 
Other454.6 1.1 76.5 379.2 
Total$17,791.1 $84.3 $78.0 $17,797.4 
DECEMBER 31, 2018DECEMBER 31, 2019
(In Millions)
AMORTIZED
COST

GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

(In Millions)AMORTIZED
COST
GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS
GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES
FAIR
VALUE
U.S. Government$101.6
$
$
$101.6
U.S. Government$138.8 $$$138.8 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions18.9
0.6

19.5
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions10.1 0.2 10.3 
Government Sponsored Agency4.5
0.2

4.7
Government Sponsored Agency4.1 0.2 4.3 
Non-U.S. GovernmentNon-U.S. Government4,076.0 5.3 2.5 4,078.8 
Corporate Debt472.9
0.4
1.8
471.5
Corporate Debt405.1 1.4 0.3 406.2 
Covered Bonds2,877.6
9.6
9.3
2,877.9
Covered Bonds3,006.7 16.1 2.4 3,020.4 
Non-U.S. Government6,488.2
2.1
8.7
6,481.6
Certificates of Deposit45.1


45.1
Certificates of Deposit262.9 262.9 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds2,966.8
5.8
12.3
2,960.3
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds3,285.4 21.7 2.1 3,305.0 
Other Asset-Backed1,146.4

4.0
1,142.4
Other Asset-Backed804.3 0.7 0.3 804.7 
Other232.0

69.6
162.4
Other291.1 0.1 73.3 217.9 
 
Total$14,354.0
$18.7
$105.7
$14,267.0
Total$12,284.5 $45.7 $80.9 $12,249.3 
As of December 31, 2020, the $17.8 billion debt securities held to maturity portfolio had an unrealized loss of $76.5 million related to other residential mortgage-backed securities, which are primarily attributable to changes in overall market interest rates and credit spreads since their purchase.
 DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In Millions)
AMORTIZED
COST

GROSS
UNREALIZED
GAINS

GROSS
UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

U.S. Government$35.0
$
$
$35.0
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions34.6
1.4
0.1
35.9
Government Sponsored Agency5.8
0.4

6.2
Corporate Debt431.5
1.0
0.4
432.1
Covered Bonds2,821.5
11.9
3.7
2,829.7
Non-U.S. Government5,536.2
1.3
6.0
5,531.5
Certificates of Deposit43.8

0.1
43.7
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds2,788.9
5.4
4.1
2,790.2
Other Asset-Backed1,175.8
0.6
0.5
1,175.9
Other175.9

45.2
130.7
     
Total$13,049.0
$22.0
$60.1
$13,010.9


TABLE 54:64: REMAINING MATURITY OF DEBT SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
 DECEMBER 31, 2018DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In Millions)
AMORTIZED
COST
 
FAIR
VALUE

AMORTIZED
COST
 
FAIR
VALUE

Due in One Year or Less$6,638.2 $6,635.5
$5,691.9 $5,695.8
Due After One Year Through Five Years7,066.0 7,040.0
6,667.8 6,663.9
Due After Five Years Through Ten Years567.9 553.0
612.2 606.3
Due After Ten Years81.9 38.5
77.1 44.9
     
Total$14,354.0 $14,267.0
$13,049.0 $13,010.9

DECEMBER 31, 2020ONE YEAR OR LESSONE TO FIVE YEARSFIVE TO TEN YEARSOVER TEN YEARSTOTAL
(In Millions)Amortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair Value
U.S. Government$90.0 $90.0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90.0 $90.0 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions1.4 1.4 0.7 0.8 0 0 0 0 2.1 2.2 
Government Sponsored Agency0.5 0.5 1.3 1.4 0.8 0.9 0.4 0.5 3.0 3.3 
Non-U.S. Government8,065.4 8,065.5 271.2 278.2 0 0 0 0 8,336.6 8,343.7 
Corporate Debt126.2 126.3 461.8 468.1 0 0 0 0 588.0 594.4 
Covered Bonds1,283.7 1,289.5 1,836.3 1,854.7 64.6 64.7 0 0 3,184.6 3,208.9 
Certificates of Deposit807.2 807.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 807.2 807.2 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds943.2 947.2 2,354.8 2,393.4 350.0 350.0 0 0 3,648.0 3,690.6 
Other Asset-Backed239.4 239.7 433.4 433.9 4.2 4.3 0 0 677.0 677.9 
Other36.6 36.0 247.7 230.3 53.7 48.2 116.6 64.7 454.6 379.2 
Total$11,593.6 $11,603.3 $5,607.2 $5,660.8 $473.3 $468.1 $117.0 $65.2 $17,791.1 $17,797.4 
Note: Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are included in the above table taking into account anticipated future prepayments.





112 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Debt securities held to maturity consist of securities that management intends to, and Northern Trust has the ability to, hold until maturity. During the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2018, approximately $287.92020, $301.5 million of securities reflected in Other Asset-Backed, Covered Bonds, Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds, and Corporate DebtU.S. government were transferred from available for sale to held to maturity, all of which were transferred in the second quarter of 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2019, $160.8 million securities reflected in covered bonds were transferred from available for sale to held to maturity.


Credit Quality Indicators. The following table provides the amortized cost of debt securities held to maturity by credit rating.

TABLE 65: AMORTIZED COST OF DEBT SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY BY CREDIT RATING
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020
(In Millions)AAAAAABBBNOT RATEDTOTAL
U.S. Government$90.0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90.0 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions0 1.0 0 1.1 0 2.1 
Government Sponsored Agency3.0 0 0 0 0 3.0 
Non-U.S. Government319.8 1,337.4 6,630.6 48.8 0 8,336.6 
Corporate Debt3.8 279.1 305.1 0 0 588.0 
Covered Bonds3,184.6 0 0 0 0 3,184.6 
Certificates of Deposit0 0 0 0 807.2 807.2 
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds2,590.9 1,057.1 0 0 0 3,648.0 
Other Asset-Backed677.0 0 0 0 0 677.0 
Other0 0 0 0 454.6 454.6 
Total$6,869.1 $2,674.6 $6,935.7 $49.9 $1,261.8 $17,791.1 
Percent of Total39 %15 %39 %0 %7 %100 %

Credit quality indicators are metrics that provide information regarding the relative credit risk of debt securities.Northern Trust maintains a high quality debt securities portfolio, with 93% of the held to maturity portfolio at December 31, 2020 comprised of securities rated A or higher. The remaining held to maturity debt securities portfolio was comprised of 7% not rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s, or Fitch Ratings. Securities not explicitly rated were grouped where possible under the credit rating of the issuer of the security.

Investment Security Gains and Losses. Net investment security Proceeds of $879.9 million, $1.2 billion, and $307.3 million in 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively, from the sale of debt securities resulted in the following gains and losses of $1.0 million were recognizedshown in 2018, and include $0.5 million of charges relatedthe following table.

TABLE 66: INVESTMENT SECURITY GAINS AND LOSSES
DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
Gross Realized Debt Securities Gains$3.4 $2.4 $1.5 
Gross Realized Debt Securities Losses(3.8)(3.5)(2.0)
Changes in Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses(1)
0 (0.3)(0.5)
Net Investment Security (Losses) Gains$(0.4)$(1.4)$(1.0)
(1) Other-than-temporary impairment losses relate to the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of certain Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) eligible held to maturity debt securities. Net investment security losses of $1.6 million, and $3.2 million were recognized in 2017, and 2016, respectively. There were $0.2 million OTTI losses in 2017 and $3.7 million


112   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation113


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OTTI losses in 2016. Proceeds of $307.3 million from the sale of securities in 2018 resulted in gross realized gains and losses of $1.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively. Proceeds of $2.2 billion from the sale of securities in 2017 resulted in gross realized gains and losses of $0.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Proceeds of $828.9 million from the sale of securities in 2016 resulted in gross realized gains and losses of $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Debt Securities with Unrealized Losses. The following tables provide information regarding debt securities that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and for 12 months or longer as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

TABLE 55: DEBT SECURITIES WITH UNREALIZED LOSSES
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018          LESS THAN 12 MONTHS         12 MONTHS OR LONGER          TOTAL
(In Millions)
FAIR
VALUE

UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

UNREALIZED
LOSSES

U.S. Government$
$
$2,862.0
$39.6
$2,862.0
$39.6
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions169.6
2.4
279.6
1.3
449.2
3.7
Government Sponsored Agency8,368.8
33.5
6,822.4
117.0
15,191.2
150.5
Non-U.S. Government5,065.2
0.8
1,274.0
9.0
6,339.2
9.8
Corporate Debt712.7
4.1
1,097.4
18.8
1,810.1
22.9
Covered Bonds646.4
3.7
696.9
10.4
1,343.3
14.1
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds1,105.0
4.6
1,189.2
11.2
2,294.2
15.8
Other Asset-Backed2,507.8
15.9
954.9
11.0
3,462.7
26.9
Commercial Mortgage-Backed22.8
0.1
274.4
4.1
297.2
4.2
Other50.5
18.8
112.6
50.8
163.1
69.6
       
Total$18,648.8
$83.9
$15,563.4
$273.2
$34,212.2
$357.1
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017          LESS THAN 12 MONTHS         12 MONTHS OR LONGER          TOTAL
(In Millions)
FAIR
VALUE

UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

UNREALIZED
LOSSES

FAIR
VALUE

UNREALIZED
LOSSES

U.S. Government$3,595.0
$32.1
$
$
$3,595.0
$32.1
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions687.8
3.3
52.0
0.3
739.8
3.6
Government Sponsored Agency6,495.6
81.3
2,998.9
27.3
9,494.5
108.6
Non-U.S. Government5,181.8
7.9


5,181.8
7.9
Corporate Debt1,547.3
9.3
922.3
14.0
2,469.6
23.3
Covered Bonds967.5
7.2
89.1
0.9
1,056.6
8.1
Sub-Sovereign, Supranational and Non-U.S. Agency Bonds1,692.4
7.5
235.8
0.4
1,928.2
7.9
Other Asset-Backed2,453.7
8.3
29.9
0.1
2,483.6
8.4
Certificates of Deposit43.7
0.1


43.7
0.1
Auction Rate

3.1
0.1
3.1
0.1
Commercial Mortgage-Backed233.5
2.6
201.6
1.5
435.1
4.1
Other82.9
27.3
48.1
17.9
131.0
45.2
       
Total$22,981.2
$186.9
$4,580.8
$62.5
$27,562.0
$249.4

As of December 31, 2018, 1,357 debt securities with a combined fair value of $34.2 billion were in an unrealized loss position, with their unrealized losses totaling $357.1 million. Unrealized losses of $150.5 million and $39.6 million related to government sponsored agency and U.S. government securities, respectively, are primarily attributable to changes in market rates since their purchase. Unrealized losses of $22.9 million within corporate debt securities primarily reflect widened credit spreads and higher market rates since purchase; 37% of the corporate debt portfolio is backed by guarantees provided by U.S. and non-U.S. governmental entities.
The majority of the $69.6 million of unrealized losses in debt securities classified as “other” at December 31, 2018, relate to securities primarily purchased at a premium or par by Northern Trust to fulfill its obligations under the CRA. Unrealized losses on these CRA-related securities are attributable to yields that are below market rates for the purpose of supporting institutions and programs that benefit low- to moderate-income communities within Northern Trust’s market area. The remaining unrealized losses on Northern Trust’s securities portfolio as of December 31, 2018, are attributable to changes in overall market interest rates, increased credit spreads, or reduced market liquidity. As of December 31, 2018,

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 113

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Northern Trust does not intend to sell any investment in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that Northern Trust will be required to sell any such investment before the recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity.
Security impairment reviews are conducted quarterly to identify and evaluate securities that have indications of possible OTTI. A determination as to whether a security’s decline in market value is other-than-temporary takes into consideration numerous factors and the relative significance of any single factor can vary by security. Factors Northern Trust considers in determining whether impairment is other-than-temporary include, but are not limited to, the length of time the security has been impaired; the severity of the impairment; the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; activity in the market of the issuer which may indicate adverse credit conditions; Northern Trust’s intent regarding the sale of the security as of the balance sheet date; and the likelihood that it will not be required to sell the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for the recovery of the security’s amortized cost basis. For each security meeting the requirements of Northern Trust’s internal screening process, an extensive review is conducted to determine if OTTI has occurred.
While all securities are considered, the process for identifying credit impairment within CRA-eligible mortgage-backed securities, a security type for which Northern Trust has recognized OTTI in 2018 and 2017, incorporates an expected loss approach using discounted cash flows on the underlying collateral pools. To evaluate whether an unrealized loss on CRA mortgage-backed securities is other-than-temporary, a calculation of the security’s present value is made using current pool data, the current delinquency pipeline, default rates and loan loss severities based on the historical performance of the pool or similar pools, and Northern Trust’s outlook for the housing market and the overall economy. If the present value of the collateral pools was found to be less than the current amortized cost of the security, a credit-related OTTI loss would be recorded in earnings equal to the difference between the two amounts.
Impairments of CRA mortgage-backed securities are influenced by a number of factors, including but not limited to, U.S. economic and housing market performance, pool credit enhancement level, year of origination, and estimated credit quality of the collateral. The factors used in estimating losses related to CRA mortgage-backed securities vary by vintage of loan origination and collateral quality.
There were $0.5 million and $0.2 million of OTTI losses recognized in 2018 and 2017, respectively. There were $3.7 million OTTI losses recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Credit Losses on Debt Securities. The table below provides information regarding total other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities, including noncredit-related amounts recognized in other comprehensive income and net impairment losses recognized in earnings, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.

TABLE 56: NET IMPAIRMENT LOSSES RECOGNIZED IN EARNINGS
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Changes in Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses(1)
$(0.5)$(0.2)$(3.7)
Noncredit-related Losses Recorded in / (Reclassified from) OCI(2)



    
Net Impairment Losses Recognized in Earnings$(0.5)$(0.2)$(3.7)

(1) For initial other-than-temporary impairments in the respective period, the balance includes the excess of the amortized cost over the fair value of the impaired securities. For subsequent impairments of the same security, the balance includes any additional changes in fair value of the security subsequent to its most recently recorded OTTI.
(2) For initial other-than-temporary impairments in the respective period, the balance includes the portion of the excess of amortized cost over the fair value of the impaired securities that was recorded in OCI. For subsequent impairments of the same security, the balance includes additional changes in OCI for that security subsequent to its most recently recorded OTTI.


114   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Provided in the table below are the cumulative credit-related losses recognized in earnings on debt securities other-than-temporarily impaired.

TABLE 57: CUMULATIVE CREDIT-RELATED LOSSES ON DEBT SECURITIES HELD
 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
(In Millions)2018
2017
Cumulative Credit-Related Losses on Debt Securities Held – Beginning of Year$3.6
$3.4
Plus: Losses on Newly Identified Impairments0.4
0.1
Additional Losses on Previously Identified Impairments0.1
0.1
Less: Current and Prior Period Losses on Debt Securities Sold or Matured During the Year

 

 
Cumulative Credit-Related Losses on Debt Securities Held – End of Year$4.1
$3.6
Note 5 – Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Northern Trust participates in the repurchase agreement market as a relatively low cost alternative for short-term funding. Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as collateralized financings and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were acquired or sold plus accrued interest. To minimize any potential credit risk associated with these transactions, the fair value of the securities purchased or sold is monitored, limits are set on exposure with counterparties, and the financial condition of counterparties is regularly assessed. It is Northern Trust’s policy to take possession, either directly or via third-party custodians, of securities purchased under agreements to resell. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are held by the counterparty until the repurchase.
The following tables summarize information related to securities purchasedSecurities Purchased under agreementsAgreements to resellResell and securities soldSecurities Sold under agreementsAgreements to repurchase.Repurchase.


TABLE 58:67: SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER AGREEMENTS TO RESELL
($ In Millions)20202019
Balance at December 31$1,596.5 $707.8 
Average Balance During the Year1,253.1 835.0 
Average Interest Rate Earned During the Year0.31 %2.10 %
Maximum Month-End Balance During the Year$2,055.6 $1,290.0 
($ In Millions)2018
2017
Balance at December 31$1,031.2
$1,303.3
Average Balance During the Year1,478.3
1,832.0
Average Interest Rate Earned During the Year2.22%1.48%
Maximum Month-End Balance During the Year1,942.0
2,064.1


TABLE 59:68: SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
($ In Millions)20202019
Balance at December 31$39.8 $489.7 
Average Balance During the Year218.3 339.0 
Average Interest Rate Paid During the Year0.47 %1.89 %
Maximum Month-End Balance During the Year$269.8 $489.7 
($ In Millions)2018
2017
Balance at December 31$168.3
$834.0
Average Balance During the Year525.2
738.9
Average Interest Rate Paid During the Year1.48%0.81%
Maximum Month-End Balance During the Year981.3
834.0


TABLE 60:69: REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR AS SECURED BORROWINGS
 December 31, 2018
(In Millions)
Remaining Contractual
Maturity of the
Agreements
Repurchase Agreements
Overnight and
Continuous
U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities$168.3
Total Borrowings168.3
Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities for Repurchase Agreements in Note 27168.3
Amounts related to agreements not included in Note 27


REMAINING CONTRACTUAL MATURITY OF THE AGREEMENTS
OVERNIGHT AND CONTINUOUS
($ In Millions)December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities$39.8 $489.7 
Total Borrowings39.8 489.7 
Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities for Repurchase Agreements in Note 2839.8 489.7 
Amounts related to agreements not included in Note 280 



2018114 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation115

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 6 – Loans and Leases
Amounts outstanding for loansLoans and leases,Leases, by segment and class, are shown below.in the following table. During the first quarter of 2020, the Corporation implemented a change in the classification of certain loans and leases to specific segments to enhance the consistency of its reporting across various regulatory regimes. As a result, the loan and lease balances as of December 31, 2019 below have been adjusted to conform to the presentation for periods ended after such date. The adjustments generally reflect reclassification of loans from the commercial real estate class to commercial and institutional, residential real estate, and private client classes. There was no impact on total Loans and Leases previously reported.

TABLE 61:70: LOANS AND LEASES
DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional$10,058.3 $9,091.1 
Commercial Real Estate3,558.4 3,104.3 
Non-U.S.1,345.7 1,576.3 
Lease Financing, net11.4 65.6 
Other288.2 164.0 
Total Commercial15,262.0 14,001.3 
Personal
Private Client11,815.1 11,071.4 
Residential Real Estate6,035.7 6,095.0 
Non-U.S.597.9 174.8 
Other49.0 67.1 
Total Personal18,497.7 17,408.3 
Total Loans and Leases$33,759.7 $31,409.6 
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
Commercial  
Commercial and Institutional$8,728.1
$9,042.2
Commercial Real Estate3,228.8
3,482.7
Non-U.S.2,701.6
1,538.5
Lease Financing, net90.7
229.2
Other426.0
265.4
   
Total Commercial15,175.2
14,558.0
   
Personal  
Private Client10,733.3
10,753.1
Residential Real Estate6,514.0
7,247.6
Other67.5
33.5
   
Total Personal17,314.8
18,034.2
   
Total Loans and Leases$32,490.0
$32,592.2
Allowance for Credit Losses Assigned to Loans and Leases(112.6)(131.2)
   
Net Loans and Leases$32,377.4
$32,461.0


Residential real estate loans consist of traditional first lien mortgages and equity credit lines that generally require a loan to collateralloan-to-collateral value ratio of no more than 65% to 80% at inception. Northern Trust’s equity credit line products generally have draw periods of up to 10 years and a balloon payment of any outstanding balance is due at maturity. Payments are interest onlyinterest-only with variable interest rates. Northern Trust does not offer equity credit lines that include an option to convert the outstanding balance to an amortizing payment loan. As of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, equity credit lines totaled $655.5$304.4 million and $908.6$448.5 million, respectively, and equity credit lines for which first liens were held by Northern Trust represented 95%97% and 93%97%, respectively, of the total equity credit lines as of those dates.
Included within the non-U.S., commercial-other, and personal-other classes are short duration advances, primarily related to the processing of custodied client investments, that totaled $2.2totaling $1.1 billion and $906.4 million at each of December 31, 20182020 and 2017, respectively.2019. Demand deposit overdrafts reclassified as loan balances totaled $152.5$26.4 million and $127.6$90.4 million at December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. There
As of December 31, 2020, there were no0 loans or leases classified as held for sale assale. As of December 31, 2018, compared to $20.92019, there were 0 loans and $53.6 million of loans and $33.1 million of leases, respectively, classified as held for sale at December 31, 2017 related to the decision to exit a non-strategic loan andsell substantially all of the lease portfolio.

116   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation115


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The components of the net investment in direct finance and leveraged leases are as follows:


TABLE 62:71: DIRECT FINANCE AND LEVERAGED LEASES
                      DECEMBER 31,DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
(In Millions)20202019
Direct Finance Leases Direct Finance Leases
Lease Receivable$9.8
$26.6
Lease Receivable$0 $1.5 
Residual Value23.8
72.4
Residual Value0 21.3 
Initial Direct Costs0.3
0.7
Initial Direct Costs0 0.2 
Unearned Income
(1.5)Unearned Income0 
 
Investment in Direct Finance Leases33.9
98.2
Investment in Direct Finance Leases0 23.0 
 
Leveraged Leases Leveraged Leases
Net Rental Receivable33.9
76.1
Net Rental Receivable11.8 19.1 
Residual Value33.3
85.6
Residual Value0 33.1 
Unearned Income(10.4)(30.7)Unearned Income(0.4)(9.6)
 
Investment in Leveraged Leases56.8
131.0
Investment in Leveraged Leases11.4 42.6 
 
Lease Financing, net$90.7
$229.2
Lease Financing, net$11.4 $65.6 


Paycheck Protection Program. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Northern Trust became a lender under the Paycheck Protection Program, as amended (PPP), which was created by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act and is administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). Loans issued under the PPP are funded by Northern Trust directly to participating borrowers. The PPP loans are guaranteed by the SBA and borrowers are eligible to apply for PPP loan forgiveness for up to the full principal amount and accrued interest of the PPP loan.
To the extent a borrower uses PPP loan proceeds to cover eligible costs and has met all other SBA loan forgiveness requirements, the SBA will determine loan forgiveness under the CARES Act and will pay to Northern Trust the eligible PPP loan forgiven amount, which will be credited to the borrower’s loan to repay or pay down the PPP loan. The SBA forgiveness portal opened on August 10, 2020 and Northern Trust’s vendor portal opened on September 11, 2020 to begin processing the PPP loan forgiveness applications. When Northern Trust submits forgiveness applications to the SBA, the SBA will have at least 90 days to respond as to the approval or denial of such application.41 PPP loan forgiveness applications went through the forgiveness process as of December 31, 2020, and 36 of those loans, totaling $6.7 million, were fully forgiven by the SBA as of such date.
As of December 31, 2020, Northern Trust had 1,087 outstanding loans totaling $207.1 million under the PPP in its commercial and institutional portfolio with an average loan balance of $0.2 million. For its origination efforts, Northern Trust received approximately $2.6 million in SBA fees, net of service charges, as of December 31, 2020.
Northern Trust accounts for loans originated under the PPP as loan receivables in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 310 and recognizes such loans at the principal amount less the net amount of loan origination fees. PPP loans are reported in Total Loans and Leases on the consolidated balance sheets.
The following schedule reflectsSBA provides a 100% guarantee on PPP loans covering principal and interest. Northern Trust considers the future minimum lease payments to be received overrisk mitigating effects of these guarantees, and accounts for them as a credit enhancement embedded in the next five yearscontract. As a result, no allowance for credit losses is measured for Northern Trust’s exposure under direct finance leases.the PPP.


TABLE 63: FUTURE MINIMUM LEASE PAYMENTS
(In Millions)
FUTURE MINIMUM
LEASE PAYMENTS

2019$3.7
20203.7
20212.1
2022
2023

Credit Quality Indicators. Credit quality indicators are statistics, measurements or other metrics that provide information regarding the relative credit risk of loans and leases. Northern Trust utilizes a variety of credit quality indicators to assess the credit risk of loans and leases at the segment, class, and individual credit exposure levels.
As part of its credit process, Northern Trust utilizes an internal borrower risk rating system to support identification, approval, and monitoring of credit risk. Borrower risk ratings are used in credit underwriting and management reporting.
Risk ratings are used for ranking the credit risk of borrowers and the probability of their default. Each borrower is rated using one of a number of ratings models, which consider both quantitative and qualitative factors. The ratings models vary among classes of loans and leases in order to capture the unique risk characteristics inherent within each particular type of credit exposure. Provided below are the more significant performance indicator attributes considered within Northern Trust’s borrower rating models, by loan and lease class.



116 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Commercial and Institutional: leverage, profit margin, liquidity, asset size and capital levels;
Commercial Real Estate: debt service coverage, loan-to-value ratio, leasing status and guarantor support;
Lease Financing and Commercial-Other: leverage, profit margin, liquidity, asset size and capital levels;
Non-U.S.: leverage, profit margin, liquidity, return on assets and capital levels;
Residential Real Estate: payment history, credit bureau scores and loan-to-value ratio;
Private Client: cash flow-to-debtcash-flow-to-debt and net worth ratios, leverage and liquidity; and
Personal-Other: cash flow-to-debtcash-flow-to-debt and net worth ratios.


While the criteria vary by model, the objective is for the borrower ratings to be consistent in both the measurement and ranking of risk. Each model is calibrated to a master rating scale to support this consistency. Ratings for borrowers not in default range from “1” for the strongest credits to “7” for the weakest non-defaulted credits. Ratings of “8” or “9” are used for defaulted borrowers. Borrower risk ratings are monitored and are revised when events or circumstances indicate a change is required. Risk ratings are generally validated at least annually.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 117

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Loan and lease segment and class balances atas of December 31, 2018 and 20172020 are provided below,in the following table, segregated by borrower ratings into “1 to 3”,3,” “4 to 5”, and “6 to 9” (watch list), categories.list and nonaccrual status) categories by year of origination at amortized cost basis. Loans that are held for investment are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income.


TABLE 64: BORROWER RATINGS
 DECEMBER 31, 2018DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In Millions)
1 TO 3
CATEGORY

4 TO 5
CATEGORY

6 TO 9
CATEGORY
(WATCH LIST)

TOTAL
1 TO 3
CATEGORY

4 TO 5
CATEGORY

6 TO 9
CATEGORY
(WATCH LIST)

TOTAL
Commercial        
Commercial and Institutional$5,477.4
$3,159.8
$90.9
$8,728.1
$5,832.9
$3,133.4
$75.9
$9,042.2
Commercial Real Estate1,209.6
1,992.2
27.0
3,228.8
1,280.7
2,187.5
14.5
3,482.7
Non-U.S.1,625.3
1,075.3
1.0
2,701.6
606.6
930.5
1.4
1,538.5
Lease Financing, net78.3
12.4

90.7
191.4
37.8

229.2
Other203.3
222.7

426.0
155.5
109.9

265.4
         
Total Commercial8,593.9
6,462.4
118.9
15,175.2
8,067.1
6,399.1
91.8
14,558.0
         
Personal        
Private Client6,321.1
4,403.2
9.0
10,733.3
6,716.0
4,027.8
9.3
10,753.1
Residential Real Estate2,745.0
3,502.3
266.7
6,514.0
2,960.5
3,978.8
308.3
7,247.6
Other32.2
35.3

67.5
19.6
13.9

33.5
         
Total Personal9,098.3
7,940.8
275.7
17,314.8
9,696.1
8,020.5
317.6
18,034.2
         
Total Loans and Leases$17,692.2
$14,403.2
$394.6
$32,490.0
$17,763.2
$14,419.6
$409.4
$32,592.2

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 117

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TABLE 72: CREDIT QUALITY INDICATOR AT AMORTIZED COST BASIS BY ORIGINATION YEAR
DECEMBER 31, 2020TERM LOANS AND LEASESREVOLVING LOANSREVOLVING LOANS CONVERTED TO TERM LOANS
(In Millions)20202019201820172016PRIORTOTAL
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional
Risk Rating:
1 to 3 Category$663.8 $546.0 $204.6 $96.0 $396.0 $448.8 $3,742.4 $5.5 $6,103.1 
4 to 5 Category793.4 505.1 354.1 405.4 134.6 167.3 1,238.7 32.3 3,630.9 
6 to 9 Category34.3 119.8 37.3 42.8 23.0 6.0 61.1 0 324.3 
Total Commercial and Institutional1,491.5 1,170.9 596.0 544.2 553.6 622.1 5,042.2 37.8 10,058.3 
Commercial Real Estate
Risk Rating:
1 to 3 Category406.3 109.2 27.6 36.5 11.8 99.4 124.3 8.7 823.8 
4 to 5 Category703.1 811.8 332.7 107.4 184.5 382.8 60.4 11.4 2,594.1 
6 to 9 Category15.3 55.2 32.0 25.8 0 12.2 0 0 140.5 
Total Commercial Real Estate1,124.7 976.2 392.3 169.7 196.3 494.4 184.7 20.1 3,558.4 
Non-U.S.
Risk Rating:
1 to 3 Category555.2 16.8 0 11.1 0 0 78.5 0 661.6 
4 to 5 Category313.1 0.7 2.0 0 0 157.9 39.2 1.8 514.7 
6 to 9 Category0 23.1 0 0 0 0 146.3 0 169.4 
Total Non-U.S.868.3 40.6 2.0 11.1 0 157.9 264.0 1.8 1,345.7 
Lease Financing, net
Risk Rating:
4 to 5 Category0 0 0 0 0 11.4 0 0 11.4 
Total Lease Financing, net0 0 0 0 0 11.4 0 0 11.4 
Other
Risk Rating:
1 to 3 Category81.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81.7 
4 to 5 Category206.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 206.5 
Total Other288.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 288.2 
Total Commercial3,772.7 2,187.7 990.3 725.0 749.9 1,285.8 5,490.9 59.7 15,262.0 
Personal
Private Client
Risk Rating:
1 to 3 Category668.6 273.7 51.7 60.4 10.2 136.1 5,392.8 47.9 6,641.4 
4 to 5 Category492.1 479.9 117.3 60.4 77.5 77.5 3,564.7 207.3 5,076.7 
6 to 9 Category6.0 0.5 22.1 3.2 0 0 63.7 1.5 97.0 
Total Private Client1,166.7 754.1 191.1 124.0 87.7 213.6 9,021.2 256.7 11,815.1 
Residential Real Estate
Risk Rating:
1 to 3 Category1,554.3 317.4 42.9 109.9 205.1 627.8 152.8 1.7 3,011.9 
4 to 5 Category854.6 359.5 115.8 163.2 209.7 896.5 273.1 7.4 2,879.8 
6 to 9 Category15.3 8.3 0.7 0.5 1.9 94.8 22.5 0 144.0 
Total Residential Real Estate2,424.2 685.2 159.4 273.6 416.7 1,619.1 448.4 9.1 6,035.7 
Non-U.S.
Risk Rating:
1 to 3 Category23.3 14.9 0 0 0 1.8 275.6 0 315.6 
4 to 5 Category12.7 26.0 11.8 0.5 0.5 7.9 217.5 5.1 282.0 
6 to 9 Category0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3 
Total Non-U.S.36.0 40.9 11.8 0.5 0.5 10.0 493.1 5.1 597.9 
Other
Risk Rating:
1 to 3 Category34.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 
4 to 5 Category14.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 
Total Other49.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49.0 
Total Personal3,675.9 1,480.2 362.3 398.1 504.9 1,842.7 9,962.7 270.9 18,497.7 
Total Loans and Leases$7,448.6 $3,667.9 $1,352.6 $1,123.1 $1,254.8 $3,128.5 $15,453.6 $330.6 $33,759.7 
Loans and leases in the “1 to 3” category are expected to exhibit minimal to modest probabilities of default and are characterized by borrowers having the strongest financial qualities, including above average financial flexibility, cash flows



118 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
and capital levels. Borrowers assigned these ratings are anticipated to experience very little to moderate financial pressure in adverse down cycledown-cycle scenarios. As a result of these characteristics, borrowers within this category exhibit a minimal to modest likelihood of loss.
Loans and leases in the “4 to 5” category are expected to exhibit moderate to acceptable probabilities of default and are characterized by borrowers with less financial flexibility than those in the “1 to 3” category. Cash flows and capital levels are generally sufficient to allow for borrowers to meet current requirements, but have fewer financial resources to manage through economic downturns. As a result of these characteristics, borrowers within this category exhibit a moderate likelihood of loss.
Loans and leases in the watch list category have elevated credit risk profiles that are monitored through internal watch lists, and consist of credits with borrower ratings of “6 to 9”.9.” These credits, which include all nonperformingnonaccrual credits, are expected to exhibit minimally acceptable probabilities of default, elevated risk of default, or are currently in default. Borrowers associated with these risk profiles that are not currently in default have limited financial flexibility. Cash flows and capital levels range from acceptable to potentially insufficient to meet current requirements, particularly in adverse down cycle scenarios. As a result of these characteristics, borrowers in this category exhibit an elevated to probable likelihood of loss.

For credit quality indicator information that was required under the former provisions of ASC Topic 310, please refer to Note 6, “Loans and Leases” included under Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
118   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

time from the contractual due date a principal or interest payment has been past due. For disclosure purposes, loans and leases that are 29 days past due or less are reported as current.
The following table provides balances and delinquency status of performingaccrual and nonperformingnonaccrual loans and leases by segment and class, as well as the other real estate owned and total nonperformingnonaccrual asset balances, as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.

TABLE 65:73: DELINQUENCY STATUS
ACCRUALNONACCRUAL WITH NO ALLOWANCE
(In Millions)CURRENT30 – 59 DAYS
PAST DUE
60 – 89 DAYS
PAST DUE
90 DAYS
OR MORE
PAST DUE
TOTAL ACCRUALNONACCRUALTOTAL LOANS
AND LEASES
December 31, 2020
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional$9,877.0 $153.7 $1.2 $0 $10,031.9 $26.4 $10,058.3 $9.1 
Commercial Real Estate3,516.2 2.0 0 0 3,518.2 40.2 3,558.4 32.3 
Non-U.S.1,345.7 0 0 0 1,345.7 0 1,345.7 0 
Lease Financing, net11.4 0 0 0 11.4 0 11.4 0 
Other288.2 0 0 0 288.2 0 288.2 0 
Total Commercial15,038.5 155.7 1.2 0 15,195.4 66.6 15,262.0 41.4 
Personal
Private Client11,765.4 29.1 9.9 7.8 11,812.2 2.9 11,815.1 2.9 
Residential Real Estate5,946.0 23.5 2.9 1.1 5,973.5 62.2 6,035.7 53.8 
Non-U.S.596.7 1.2 0 0 597.9 0 597.9 0 
Other49.0 0 0 0 49.0 0 49.0 0 
Total Personal18,357.1 53.8 12.8 8.9 18,432.6 65.1 18,497.7 56.7 
Total Loans and Leases$33,395.6 $209.5 $14.0 $8.9 $33,628.0 $131.7 $33,759.7 $98.1 
Other Real Estate Owned$0.7 
Total Nonaccrual Assets$132.4 
(In Millions)CURRENT
30 – 59 DAYS
PAST DUE

60 – 89 DAYS
PAST DUE

90 DAYS
OR MORE
PAST DUE

TOTAL
PERFORMING

NONPERFORMING
TOTAL LOANS
AND LEASES

December 31, 2018       
Commercial       
Commercial and Institutional$8,678.2
$37.4
$4.5
$1.2
$8,721.3
$6.8
$8,728.1
Commercial Real Estate3,191.5
8.4
15.6
6.4
3,221.9
6.9
3,228.8
Non-U.S.2,701.2



2,701.2
0.4
2,701.6
Lease Financing, net90.7



90.7

90.7
Other426.0



426.0

426.0
        
Total Commercial15,087.6
45.8
20.1
7.6
15,161.1
14.1
15,175.2
        
Personal       
Private Client10,681.1
39.5
12.5

10,733.1
0.2
10,733.3
Residential Real Estate6,376.8
27.2
6.2
8.8
6,419.0
95.0
6,514.0
Other67.5



67.5

67.5
        
Total Personal17,125.4
66.7
18.7
8.8
17,219.6
95.2
17,314.8
        
Total Loans and Leases$32,213.0
$112.5
$38.8
$16.4
$32,380.7
$109.3
$32,490.0
   Other Real Estate Owned $8.4
 
   Total Nonperforming Assets $117.7
 

(In Millions)CURRENT
30 – 59 DAYS
PAST DUE

60 – 89 DAYS
PAST DUE

90 DAYS
OR MORE
PAST DUE

TOTAL
PERFORMING

NONPERFORMING
TOTAL LOANS
AND LEASES

December 31, 2017       
Commercial       
Commercial and Institutional$8,999.4
$13.3
$3.1
$0.4
$9,016.2
$26.0
$9,042.2
Commercial Real Estate3,455.3
14.1
4.1
0.9
3,474.4
8.3
3,482.7
Non-U.S.1,538.3
0.2


1,538.5

1,538.5
Lease Financing, net229.2



229.2

229.2
Other265.4



265.4

265.4
        
Total Commercial14,487.6
27.6
7.2
1.3
14,523.7
34.3
14,558.0
        
Personal       
Private Client10,687.5
55.3
9.7
0.6
10,753.1

10,753.1
Residential Real Estate7,059.4
53.8
11.9
6.1
7,131.2
116.4
7,247.6
Other33.5



33.5

33.5
        
Total Personal17,780.4
109.1
21.6
6.7
17,917.8
116.4
18,034.2
        
Total Loans and Leases$32,268.0
$136.7
$28.8
$8.0
$32,441.5
$150.7
$32,592.2
   Other Real Estate Owned $4.6
 
   Total Nonperforming Assets $155.3
 



20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 119

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table provides information related to impaired loans by segment and class.

TABLE 66: IMPAIRED LOANS
 AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In Millions)
RECORDED
INVESTMENT

UNPAID
PRINCIPAL
BALANCE

SPECIFIC
ALLOWANCE

RECORDED
INVESTMENT

UNPAID
PRINCIPAL
BALANCE

SPECIFIC
ALLOWANCE

With no related specific allowance      
Commercial and Institutional$0.2
$0.4
$
$24.9
$30.3
$
Commercial Real Estate5.8
7.6

5.7
7.6

Residential Real Estate76.7
104.7

90.9
124.9

Private Client1.7
1.7

0.7
0.7

With a related specific allowance      
Commercial and Institutional6.4
7.3
3.0
0.5
5.4
0.5
Commercial Real Estate2.6
2.8
1.1
2.8
2.8
0.6
Residential Real Estate22.8
26.1
3.1
14.3
14.9
4.3
Total      
Commercial15.0
18.1
4.1
33.9
46.1
1.1
Personal101.2
132.5
3.1
105.9
140.5
4.3
       
Total$116.2
$150.6
$7.2
$139.8
$186.6
$5.4

 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 
(In Millions)
AVERAGE
RECORDED
INVESTMENT

INTEREST
INCOME
RECOGNIZED

AVERAGE
RECORDED
INVESTMENT

INTEREST
INCOME
RECOGNIZED

With no related specific allowance    
Commercial and Institutional$6.8
$
$8.7
$
Commercial Real Estate6.4
0.2
9.2
0.1
Residential Real Estate94.9
1.9
105.0
1.5
Private Client0.6
0.1
0.2

With a related specific allowance    
Commercial and Institutional4.6

6.5

Commercial Real Estate2.1

2.6

Residential Real Estate9.2

17.0

Total    
Commercial19.9
0.2
27.0
0.1
Personal104.7
2.0
122.2
1.5
     
Total$124.6
$2.2
$149.2
$1.6

Note: Average recorded investments in impaired loans are calculated as the average of the month-end impaired loan balances for the period.

ACCRUALNONACCRUAL WITH NO ALLOWANCE
(In Millions)CURRENT30 – 59 DAYS
PAST DUE
60 – 89 DAYS
PAST DUE
90 DAYS
OR MORE
PAST DUE
TOTAL ACCRUALNONACCRUALTOTAL LOANS
AND LEASES
December 31, 2019
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional$9,068.3 $4.1 $9.9 $1.2 $9,083.5 $7.6 $9,091.1 $0.8 
Commercial Real Estate3,089.6 2.3 4.1 4.7 3,100.7 3.6 3,104.3 2.4 
Non-U.S.1,576.3 1,576.3 1,576.3 
Lease Financing, net65.6 65.6 65.6 
Other164.0 164.0 164.0 
Total Commercial13,963.8 6.4 14.0 5.9 13,990.1 11.2 14,001.3 3.2 
Personal
Private Client11,027.9 33.2 9.5 0.3 11,070.9 0.5 11,071.4 0.5 
Residential Real Estate5,997.7 19.8 4.9 1.2 6,023.6 71.4 6,095.0 66.4 
Non-U.S174.1 0.2 174.3 0.5 174.8 0.5 
Other67.1 67.1 67.1 
Total Personal17,266.8 53.2 14.4 1.5 17,335.9 72.4 17,408.3 67.4 
Total Loans and Leases$31,230.6 $59.6 $28.4 $7.4 $31,326.0 $83.6 $31,409.6 $70.6 
Other Real Estate Owned$3.2 
Total Nonaccrual Assets$86.8 
Interest income that would have been recorded on nonperformingfor nonaccrual loans and leases in accordance with their original terms totaled approximatelywas $4.6 million in 2020, $7.3 million in 2019, and $8.0 million in 2018, $9.12018.

Collateral Dependent Financial Assets. A financial asset is collateral-dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the sale or operation of the collateral. Most of Northern Trust’s collateral dependent credit exposure relates to its residential real estate portfolio for which the collateral is usually the underlying real estate property. For collateral dependent financial assets, it is Northern Trust’s policy to reserve or charge-off the difference between the amortized cost basis of the loan and the value of the collateral. The collateral dependent financial asset balance as of December 31, 2020 was immaterial to Northern Trust’s financial statements.

Nonaccrual Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs). A loan that has been modified as a concession by Northern Trust or a bankruptcy court resulting from the debtor’s financial difficulties is referred to as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). Included within nonaccrual loans were $38.9 million in 2017, and $8.5$54.9 million in 2016.
of nonaccrual TDRs and $29.3 million and $27.7 million of accrual TDRs as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. There were $12.6$10.4 million and $9.4$8.2 million of aggregate undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit at December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively, issued to borrowers whose loans were classified as nonperforming or impaired.with TDR modifications of loans.

Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs). Included within impaired loans were $64.6 million and $72.5 million of nonperforming TDRs and $35.2 million and $25.9 million of performing TDRs as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.





120  2018 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables provide,table provides, by segment and class, the number of TDR modifications of loans and leases modified in TDRs during the years ended December 31, 2018,2020, and 2017,2019, and the recorded investments and unpaid principal balances as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


TABLE 67:74: TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS
($ In Millions)
NUMBER OF
LOANS AND
LEASES

RECORDED
INVESTMENT

UNPAID
PRINCIPAL
BALANCE

($ In Millions)NUMBER OF
LOANS AND
LEASES
RECORDED
INVESTMENT
UNPAID
PRINCIPAL
BALANCE
December 31, 2018  
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020
Commercial  Commercial
Commercial and Institutional1
$0.3
$0.5
Commercial and Institutional3 $24.3 $24.5 
Commercial Real Estate2
2.8
2.8
  
Total Commercial3
3.1
3.3
Total Commercial3 24.3 24.5 
  
Personal  Personal
Residential Real Estate48
27.7
30.8
Residential Real Estate22 16.2 16.7 
Private Client1

0.1
  
Total Personal49
27.7
30.9
Total Personal22 16.2 16.7 
  
Total Loans and Leases52
$30.8
$34.2
Total Loans and Leases25 $40.5 $41.2 
Note: Period-end balances reflect all paydowns and charge-offs during the year.
($ In Millions)
NUMBER OF
LOANS AND
LEASES

RECORDED
INVESTMENT

UNPAID
PRINCIPAL
BALANCE

($ In Millions)NUMBER OF
LOANS AND
LEASES
RECORDED
INVESTMENT
UNPAID
PRINCIPAL
BALANCE
December 31, 2017  
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019
Commercial  Commercial
Commercial and Institutional3
$0.4
$1.4
Commercial and Institutional$7.5 $8.8 
Commercial Real Estate2
1.8
1.8
Commercial Real Estate
  
Total Commercial5
2.2
3.2
Total Commercial7.5 8.8 
  
Personal  Personal
Residential Real Estate66
22.1
22.8
Residential Real Estate45 37.4 38.8 
Private Client3
0.2
0.5
  
Total Personal69
22.3
23.3
Total Personal45 37.4 38.8 
  
Total Loans and Leases74
$24.5
$26.5
Total Loans and Leases48 $44.9 $47.6 
Note: Period-end balances reflect all paydowns and charge-offs during the year.


TDR modifications primarily involve extensions of term, deferrals of principal, interest rate concessions, and other modifications. Other modifications typically reflect other nonstandard terms which Northern Trust would not offer in non-troubled situations.
During the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, the TDR modifications of loans within residential real estate were primarily extensions of term, other modifications, deferrals of principal, other modifications, and interest rate concessions. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, TDR modifications of loans within commercial and institutional commercial real estate,were other modifications and private client classes were extensions of term, deferrals of principal, and other modifications. term.
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the TDR modifications of loans within residential real estate loans were primarily other modifications, extensions of term, deferrals of principal, and interest rate concessions and other modifications; modificationconcessions. During the year ended December 31, 2019, TDR modifications of loans within commercial and institutional and commercial real estate and private client classes were primarilyother modifications, extensions of term, orand deferrals of principal.
There were four0 loans or leases modified in TDRsTDR modifications during the previous twelve-month periodsperiod which subsequently became nonperforminghad a payment default during the year ended December 31, 2018. 2020.
There were two5 loans or leases modified in TDRsTDR modifications during the previous twelve-month periodsperiod which subsequently became nonperforminghad a payment default during the year ended
December 31, 2017.
All2019. The total recorded investment for these loans was approximately $5.8 million and leases modified in troubled debt restructurings are evaluatedthe unpaid principal balance for impairment. The nature and extent of impairment of TDRs, including those which have experienced a subsequent default, is considered in the determination of an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses.these loans was approximately $6.1 million.
Northern Trust may obtain physical possession of real estate via foreclosure.foreclosure on an in-substance repossession. As of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, Northern Trust held foreclosed real estate properties with a carrying value of $8.4$0.7 million and $4.6$3.2 million, respectively, as

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 121

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a result of obtaining physical possession. In addition, as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, Northern Trust had loans with a carrying value of $10.9$7.9 million and $14.1$18.1 million, respectively, for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.

TDR Relief — COVID-19. Due to the economic environment arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been two forms of relief provided for classifying loans as TDRs: the Interagency Guidance (as defined below) and the CARES Act.
Various banking regulators, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 121

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, have issued guidance in the April 7, 2020 Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus (revised) on loan modification treatment (Interagency Guidance) pursuant to which financial institutions can apply ASC 310-40 Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. In accordance with the Interagency Guidance, a loan modification is not considered a TDR if the modification is related to COVID-19; the borrower had been current (not more than 29 days past due) when the modification program was implemented; and the modification includes payment deferrals for not more than 6 months.
Under section 4013 of the CARES Act, relief provided to lenders exempting certain loan modifications which would otherwise be classified as TDRs from such classification applies for loans that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The TDR relief under the CARES Act applies to COVID-19-related modifications that were made from March 1, 2020 until the earlier of (a) January 1, 2022 (this date was updated from December 31, 2020, after the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 was enacted on December 27, 2020) or (b) 60 days from the date the COVID-19 national emergency officially ends.
Financial institutions may account for eligible loan modifications under the Interagency Guidance and/or the CARES Act. Northern Trust has elected to apply both the CARES Act and the Interagency Guidance, as applicable, in providing borrowers with loan modification relief in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. All other types of modifications which do not meet the CARES Act or Interagency Guidance requirements continue to be governed by existing regulations and accounting policies.
The following tables provide, by segment and class, the number of total COVID-19-related loan modifications including the loan volume and deferred principal and interest balances as of December 31, 2020, for which Northern Trust applied an exemption from TDR classification that are in active deferral (loans currently in the deferral period) or completed deferral (loans that returned to their regular payment schedule).
TABLE 75: COVID-19 LOAN MODIFICATIONS NOT CONSIDERED TDRS IN ACTIVE DEFERRAL STATUS
DECEMBER 31, 2020
($ In Millions)NUMBER OF COVID-19 RELATED MODIFICATIONSLOAN VOLUMEDEFERRED PRINCIPAL AMOUNTDEFERRED INTEREST AMOUNT
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional1 $6.0 $0 $0 
Commercial Real Estate1 0.7 0 0 
Total Commercial2 $6.7 $0 $0 
Personal
Private Client8 $8.9 $0.1 $0.1 
Residential Real Estate21 5.1 0.1 0.1 
Total Personal29 $14.0 $0.2 $0.2 
Total Loans31 $20.7 $0.2 $0.2 

TABLE 76: COVID-19 LOAN MODIFICATIONS NOT CONSIDERED TDRS THAT HAVE COMPLETED DEFERRAL
DECEMBER 31, 2020
($ In Millions)NUMBER OF COVID-19 RELATED MODIFICATIONSLOAN VOLUMEDEFERRED PRINCIPAL AMOUNTDEFERRED INTEREST AMOUNT
Commercial
Commercial and Institutional99 $249.3 $0.1 $2.2 
Commercial Real Estate97 467.8 0 3.2 
Total Commercial196 $717.1 $0.1 $5.4 
Personal
Private Client27 $171.9 $0 $1.1 
Residential Real Estate412 182.7 1.6 2.2 
Total Personal439 $354.6 $1.6 $3.3 
Total Loans635 $1,071.7 $1.7 $8.7 

Not included in the table above are 57 loans with a previous $63.0 million loan balance that had been granted payment deferrals but have since paid off.




122 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Northern Trust continues to accrue and recognize interest income during the loan deferral period, and hence has not moved these loans to nonaccrual or reported them as past due. Further, these loan balances continue to be assessed on a collective basis for purposes of measuring an allowance for expected credit losses.
Note 7 – Allowance for Credit Losses
During the first quarter of 2020, the Corporation implemented a change in the classification of certain loans and leases to specific segments to enhance the consistency of its reporting across various regulatory regimes. The allowance for credit losses as of and prior to December 31, 2019 remains unadjusted, as the impact of the reclassification on the allowance was immaterial.
The Corporation adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13) on January 1, 2020, which significantly changed the way impairment of financial instruments is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of financial instruments. An opening balance sheet adjustment related to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 resulted in an increase to the allowance for credit losses of $13.7 million, with a corresponding adjustment to decrease retained earnings by $10.1 million, net of tax.

Allowance and Provision for Credit Losses.The allowance for credit losses — which represents management’s best estimate of probablelifetime expected credit losses related to various portfolios subject to credit risk, off-balance sheet credit exposures, and specific borrower relationships and inherent in the various loan and lease portfolios, undrawn commitments, and standby letters of credit, is determined by management through a disciplined credit review process. Northern Trust’s accounting policiesTrust measures expected credit losses of financial assets with similar risk characteristics on a collective basis. A financial asset is measured individually if it does not share similar risk characteristics with other financial assets and the related to the estimationallowance is determined through an individual evaluation.
Management’s estimates utilized in establishing an appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses are not dependent on any single assumption. In determining an appropriate allowance level, management evaluates numerous variables, many of which are interrelated or dependent on other assumptions and estimates, and takes into consideration past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Northern Trust employs multiple scenarios over a reasonable and supportable period of currently two years to project future conditions. For periods beyond the charging offreasonable and supportable period, Northern Trust reverts to its own historical loss experiences on a straight-line basis over four quarters. The primary forecast, consistent with Northern Trust’s economic outlook publications, assumes continued economic recovery from the challenges of loans, leasesCOVID-19, with steady growth and other extensionsa falling unemployment rate over the forecast horizon. An alternative scenario is also considered, which contemplates a resurgence of the virus, causing a double-dip recession.
The results of the credit deemed uncollectiblereserve estimation methodology are consistent across both loanreviewed quarterly by Northern Trust’s Credit Loss Reserve Committee, which receives input from Credit Risk Management, Treasury, Corporate Finance, the Economic Research group, and lease segments.
Loans, leaseseach of Northern Trust’s business units. The Credit Loss Reserve Committee determines the probability weights applied to each forecast approved by Northern Trust’s Macroeconomic Scenario Development Committee, and other extensions of credit deemed uncollectible are chargedalso reviews and approves qualitative adjustments to the collective allowance in line with Northern Trust’s qualitative adjustment framework.

The following table provides information regarding changes in the total allowance for credit losses. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Determinations as to whether an uncollectible loan is charged off or a specific allowance is established are based on management’s assessment as to the level of certainty regarding the amount of loss.
Changes in the allowance for credit losses by segment were as follows:

TABLE 68:77: CHANGES IN THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
2020
(In Millions)LOANS AND LEASESUNDRAWN LOAN COMMITMENTS AND STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDITDEBT SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITYOTHER FINANCIAL ASSETSTOTAL
Balance at End of Prior Period$104.5 $19.9 $0 $0 $124.4 
Cumulative Effect Adjustment(2.2)8.9 6.6 0.4 13.7 
Balance at Beginning of Period102.3 28.8 6.6 0.4 138.1 
Charge-Offs(9.7)0 0 0 (9.7)
Recoveries6.5 0 0 0 6.5 
Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs)(3.2)0 0 0 (3.2)
Provision for Credit Losses91.6 32.3 0.7 0.4 125.0 
Balance at End of Period$190.7 $61.1 $7.3 $0.8 $259.9 
 201820172016
(In Millions)COMMERCIAL
PERSONAL
TOTAL
COMMERCIAL
PERSONAL
TOTAL
COMMERCIAL
PERSONAL
TOTAL
Balance at Beginning of Year$80.8
$73.0
$153.8
$104.9
$87.1
$192.0
$114.8
$118.5
$233.3
Charge-Offs(0.9)(9.2)(10.1)(11.4)(10.1)(21.5)(16.6)(10.7)(27.3)
Recoveries1.7
7.3
9.0
5.5
5.8
11.3
4.8
7.3
12.1
          
Net (Charge-Offs) Recoveries0.8
(1.9)(1.1)(5.9)(4.3)(10.2)(11.8)(3.4)(15.2)
Provision for Credit Losses(2.9)(11.6)(14.5)(18.2)(9.8)(28.0)2.0
(28.0)(26.0)
Effects of Foreign Exchange Rates





(0.1)
(0.1)
          
Balance at End of Year$78.7
$59.5
$138.2
$80.8
$73.0
$153.8
$104.9
$87.1
$192.0
          
Allowance for Credit Losses Assigned to:         
Loans and Leases$57.6
$55.0
$112.6
$63.5
$67.7
$131.2
$83.7
$77.3
$161.0
Undrawn Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit21.1
4.5
25.6
17.3
5.3
22.6
21.2
9.8
31.0
          
Total Allowance for Credit Losses$78.7
$59.5
$138.2
$80.8
$73.0
$153.8
$104.9
$87.1
$192.0

122   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation123


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2019
(In Millions)LOANS AND LEASESUNDRAWN LOAN COMMITMENTS AND STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDITTOTAL
Balance at Beginning of Period$112.6 $25.6 $138.2 
Charge-Offs(6.5)(6.5)
Recoveries7.2 7.2 
Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs)0.7 0.7 
Provision for Credit Losses(8.8)(5.7)(14.5)
Balance at End of Period$104.5 $19.9 $124.4 

2018
(In Millions)LOANS AND LEASESUNDRAWN LOAN COMMITMENTS AND STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDITTOTAL
Balance at Beginning of Period$131.2 $22.6 $153.8 
Charge-Offs(10.1)(10.1)
Recoveries9.0 9.0 
Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs)(1.1)(1.1)
Provision for Credit Losses(17.5)3.0 (14.5)
Balance at End of Period$112.6 $25.6 $138.2 
The current-year provision primarily reflected an increase in the reserve evaluated on a collective basis. The increase in the collective basis reserve was primarily driven by current and projected economic conditions and downgrades in the portfolio, both resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts, with increases primarily in the commercial and institutional and commercial real estate portfolios.

For credit exposure and the associated allowance related to fee receivables, please refer to Note 18, “Revenue from Contracts with Clients.” For information related to the allowance for debt securities available for sale, please refer to Note 4, “Securities.” For all other financial assets recognized at amortized cost, which include Cash and Due from Banks, Other Central Bank Deposits, Interest Bearing Deposits with Banks, Federal Funds Sold, and Other Assets, please refer to the Allowance for Other Financial Assets section within this footnote.

Allowance for the Loan and Lease Portfolio. The following table provides information regarding changes in the total allowance for credit losses, including undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit, by segment.
TABLE 78: CHANGES IN THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES RELATED TO LOANS AND LEASES
2020
LOANS AND LEASESUNDRAWN LOAN COMMITMENTS AND STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDIT
(In Millions)COMMERCIALPERSONALTOTALCOMMERCIALPERSONALTOTAL
Balance at End of Prior Period$58.1 $46.4 $104.5 $15.8 $4.1 $19.9 
Cumulative Effect Adjustment(5.9)3.7 (2.2)11.9 (3.0)8.9 
Balance at Beginning of Period52.2 50.1 102.3 27.7 1.1 28.8 
Charge-Offs(6.3)(3.4)(9.7)0 0 0 
Recoveries2.4 4.1 6.5 0 0 0 
Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs)(3.9)0.7 (3.2)0 0 0 
Provision for Credit Losses93.9 (2.3)91.6 29.9 2.4 32.3 
Balance at End of Period$142.2 $48.5 $190.7 $57.6 $3.5 $61.1 



124 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2019
LOANS AND LEASESUNDRAWN LOAN COMMITMENTS AND STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDIT
(In Millions)COMMERCIALPERSONALTOTALCOMMERCIALPERSONALTOTAL
Balance at Beginning of Period$57.6 $55.0 $112.6 $21.1 $4.5 $25.6 
Charge-Offs(3.0)(3.5)(6.5)
Recoveries0.9 6.3 7.2 
Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs)(2.1)2.8 0.7 
Provision for Credit Losses2.6 (11.4)(8.8)(5.3)(0.4)(5.7)
Balance at End of Period$58.1 $46.4 $104.5 $15.8 $4.1 $19.9 
2018
LOANS AND LEASESUNDRAWN LOAN COMMITMENTS AND STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDIT
(In Millions)COMMERCIALPERSONALTOTALCOMMERCIALPERSONALTOTAL
Balance at Beginning of Period$63.5 $67.7 $131.2 $17.3 $5.3 $22.6 
Charge-Offs(0.9)(9.2)(10.1)
Recoveries1.7 7.3 9.0 — 
Net Recoveries (Charge-Offs)0.8 (1.9)(1.1)0 0 0 
Provision for Credit Losses(6.7)(10.8)(17.5)3.8 (0.8)3.0 
Balance at End of Period$57.6 $55.0 $112.6 $21.1 $4.5 $25.6 
The increase to the allowance for both loans and leases and undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit for 2020 was primarily due to an increase in the reserve evaluated on a collective basis driven by current and projected economic conditions and downgrades in the portfolio, both resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts. The largest increases were in the commercial and institutional and commercial real estate portfolios for the allowance for loans and leases and the commercial and institutional portfolio for the allowance for undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit.
The following table provides information regarding the recorded investments in loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses for loans and leases and undrawn loan commitments and standby letters of credit by segment as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


TABLE 69:79: RECORDED INVESTMENTS IN LOANS AND LEASES
DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
(In Millions)COMMERCIALPERSONALTOTALCOMMERCIALPERSONALTOTAL
Loans and Leases
Evaluated on an Individual Basis$66.6 $65.1 $131.7 $10.4 $81.8 $92.2 
Evaluated on a Collective Basis15,195.4 18,432.6 33,628.0 13,990.9 17,326.5 31,317.4 
Total Loans and Leases15,262.0 18,497.7 33,759.7 14,001.3 17,408.3 31,409.6 
Allowance for Credit Losses on Credit Exposures
Evaluated on an Individual Basis8.8 0.3 9.1 3.4 1.6 5.0 
Evaluated on a Collective Basis133.4 48.2 181.6 54.7 44.8 99.5 
Allowance Assigned to Loans and Leases142.2 48.5 190.7 58.1 46.4 104.5 
Allowance for Undrawn Loan Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit
Evaluated on an Individual Basis1.6 0 1.6 1.9 1.9 
Evaluated on a Collective Basis56.0 3.5 59.5 13.9 4.1 18.0 
Allowance Assigned to Undrawn Loan Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit57.6 3.5 61.1 15.8 4.1 19.9 
Total Allowance Assigned to Loans and Leases and Undrawn Loan Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit$199.8 $52.0 $251.8 $73.9 $50.5 $124.4 

(In Millions)COMMERCIAL
PERSONAL
TOTAL
December 31, 2018   
Loans and Leases   
Specifically Evaluated for Impairment$15.0
$101.2
$116.2
Evaluated for Inherent Impairment15,160.2
17,213.6
32,373.8
    
Total Loans and Leases15,175.2
17,314.8
32,490.0
Allowance for Credit Losses on Credit Exposures   
Specifically Evaluated for Impairment4.1
3.1
7.2
Evaluated for Inherent Impairment53.5
51.9
105.4
    
Allowance Assigned to Loans and Leases57.6
55.0
112.6
Allowance for Undrawn Exposures   
Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit21.1
4.5
25.6
    
Total Allowance for Credit Losses$78.7
$59.5
$138.2

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 125

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Millions)COMMERCIAL
PERSONAL
TOTAL
December 31, 2017   
Loans and Leases   
Specifically Evaluated for Impairment$33.9
$105.9
$139.8
Evaluated for Inherent Impairment14,524.1
17,928.3
32,452.4
    
Total Loans and Leases14,558.0
18,034.2
32,592.2
Allowance for Credit Losses on Credit Exposures   
Specifically Evaluated for Impairment1.1
4.3
5.4
Evaluated for Inherent Impairment62.4
63.4
125.8
    
Allowance Assigned to Loans and Leases63.5
67.7
131.2
Allowance for Undrawn Exposures   
Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit17.3
5.3
22.6
    
Total Allowance for Credit Losses$80.8
$73.0
$153.8
Allowance for Debt Securities Held to Maturity Securities Portfolio. The following table provides information regarding changes in the total allowance for credit losses for debt securities held to maturity during 2020.

TABLE 80: CHANGES IN THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES RELATED TO DEBT SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
2020
(In Millions)CORPORATE DEBTNON-U.S. GOVERNMENTSUB-SOVEREIGN, SUPERNATIONAL, AND NON-U.S. AGENCY BONDSCOVERED BONDSOTHERTOTAL
Balance at End of Prior Period$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 
Cumulative Effect Adjustment0.8 0.3 0.9 0 4.6 6.6 
Balance at Beginning of Period0.8 0.3 0.9 0 4.6 6.6 
Provision for Credit Losses0 (0.1)0.3 0.1 0.4 0.7 
Balance at End of Period$0.8 $0.2 $1.2 $0.1 $5.0 $7.3 
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, Northern Trust recognized $4.4 million of cumulative Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment (OTTI) losses on the debt securities classified as other as of December 31, 2019. For debt securities with previous OTTI losses recorded, Northern Trust applied ASU 2016-13 on a prospective basis whereby the amortized cost basis of the impaired security remains unchanged immediately before and after adopting ASU 2016-13. The allowance recorded at January 1, 2020 for debt securities held to maturity equals the difference between the calculated expected loss and the amount of OTTI loss previously recorded and represents the cumulative effect adjustment required upon the adoption of ASU 2016-13.
The allowance attributable to debt securities held to maturity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 was primarily due to the reserve evaluated on a collective basis driven by current and projected economic conditions resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related market and economic impacts.

Allowance for Other Financial Assets. The allowance for Other Financial Assets consists of the allowance for Cash and Due from Banks, Other Central Bank Deposits, Interest Bearing Deposits with Banks, Federal Funds Sold, and Other Assets. Northern Trust’s portfolio is composed mostly of institutions within the “1 to 3” internal borrower rating category and expected to exhibit minimal to modest likelihood of loss. The allowance for credit losses related to Other Financial Assets was $0.8 million as of December 31, 2020.

Accrued Interest. Northern Trust elected not to measure an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivables related to its loan and securities portfolios as its policy is to write-off uncollectible accrued interest receivable balances in a timely manner. The following table provides the amount of accrued interest excluded from the amortized cost basis of the following portfolios.

TABLE 81: ACCRUED INTEREST
(In Millions)DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
Loans and Leases$55.3 $84.5 
Debt Securities
Held to Maturity$73.8 $82.3 
Available for Sale106.3 119.0 
Other Financial Assets$1.4 $14.7 
The amount of accrued interest reversed through interest income for loans and leases was immaterial and there was 0 accrued interest reversed through interest income related to any other financial assets during 2020.
Note 8 – Concentrations of Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk exist if a number of borrowers or other counterparties are engaged in similar activities and have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. The fact that a credit exposure falls into one of these groups does not necessarily indicate that the credit has a higher than normal degree of credit risk. These groups are: banks and bank holding companies, residential real estate, and commercial real estate.





126 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Banks and Bank Holding Companies. At December 31, 2018, on-balance-sheet2020, on-balance sheet credit risk to banks and bank holding companies, both U.S. and non-U.S., consisted primarily of interest-bearing depositsInterest-Bearing Deposits with banksBanks of $4.3$4.4 billion, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell of $1.2 billion, and demand balances maintained at correspondent banks of $4.5$4.3 billion, and Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell of $1.6 billion. At December 31, 2017, on-balance-sheet2019, on-balance sheet credit risk to banks and bank holding companies, both U.S. and non-U.S., consisted primarily of interest-bearing depositsInterest-Bearing Deposits with banksBanks of $5.6$4.9 billion, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell of $1.3 billion, and demand balances maintained at correspondent banks of $4.3 billion.billion, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell of $707.8 million, and Federal Funds Sold of $5.0 million. Credit risk associated with U.S. and non-U.S. banks and bank holding companies deemed to be counterparties by Credit Risk Management is managed by the Capital Markets Credit Committee. Credit limits are established through a review process that includes an internally-prepared financial analysis, use of an internal risk rating system and consideration of external ratings from rating agencies. Northern Trust places deposits with banks that

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 123

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

have strong internal and external credit ratings and the average life to maturity of deposits with banks is maintained on a short-term basis in order to respond quickly to changing credit conditions.
Residential Real Estate. At December 31, 2018, residentialResidential real estate loans totaled $6.5$6.0 billion or 22%at December 31, 2020 and 2019, representing 19% and 20%, respectively, of total U.S. loans and leases at December 31, 2018, compared with $7.2 billion, or 23% of total U.S. loans and leases at December 31, 2017.leases. Residential real estate loans consist of traditional first lien mortgages and equity credit lines, which generally require a loan-to-collateral value ratio of no more than 65% to 80% at inception. Revaluations of supporting collateral are obtained upon refinancing or default or when otherwise considered warranted. Collateral revaluations for mortgages are performed by independent third parties. Of the total $6.5$6.0 billion in residential real estate loans $1.7at December 31, 2020, $1.6 billion were in Florida, $1.3 billion were in California, and $1.2 billion$894.9 million were in the greater Chicago area, with the remainder distributed throughout the other geographic regions within the U.S. served by Northern Trust. Legally binding undrawn commitments to extend residential real estate credit, which are primarily equity credit lines, totaled $824.0$676.1 million and $1.0 billion$714.2 million at December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
Commercial Real Estate. In managing its credit exposure, management has defined a commercial real estate loan as one where: (1) the borrower’s principal business activity is the acquisition or the development of real estate for commercial purposes; (2) the principal collateral is real estate held for commercial purposes, and loan repayment is expected to flow from the operation of the property; or (3) the loan repayment is expected to flow from the sale or refinance of real estate as a normal and ongoing part of the business. Unsecured lines of credit to firms or individuals engaged in commercial real estate endeavors are included without regard to the use of loan proceeds. The commercial real estate portfolio consists of commercial mortgages and construction, acquisition and development loans extended primarily to experienced investors well known to Northern Trust. Underwriting standards generally reflect conservative loan-to-value ratios and debt service coverage requirements. Recourse to borrowers through guarantees is also commonly required. Commercial mortgage financing is provided for the acquisition or refinancing of income-producing properties. Cash flows from the properties generally are sufficient to amortize the loan. These loans are primarily located in the California, Illinois, Florida, Texas, and ArizonaNew York markets. Construction, acquisition and development loans provide financing for commercial real estate prior to rental income stabilization. The intent is generally that the borrower will sell the project or refinance the loan through a commercial mortgage with Northern Trust or another financial institution upon completion.

The table below provides additional detail regarding commercial real estate loan types. During the first quarter of 2020, the Corporation implemented a change in the classification of certain loans and leases to specific segments to enhance the consistency of its reporting across various regulatory regimes. As a result, commercial real estate balances as of December 31, 2019 below have been adjusted to conform to the presentation for periods ended after such date. The adjustments generally reflect reclassification of loans from the commercial real estate class to commercial and institutional, residential real estate, and private client classes. There was no impact on total Loans and Leases previously reported.


TABLE 70:82: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS
DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
Commercial Mortgages
Office$831.3 $754.3 
Apartment/ Multi-family906.8 646.5 
Retail561.3 573.3 
Industrial/ Warehouse344.2 278.0 
Other409.9 420.1 
Total Commercial Mortgages3,053.5 2,672.2 
Construction, Acquisition and Development Loans504.9 432.1 
Total Commercial Real Estate Loans$3,558.4 $3,104.3 
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
Commercial Mortgages  
Office$811.2
$825.2
Apartment/ Multi-family490.7
623.3
Retail529.7
631.1
Industrial/ Warehouse254.9
311.1
Other426.6
445.6
   
Total Commercial Mortgages2,513.1
2,836.3
Construction, Acquisition and Development Loans420.6
350.8
Single Family Investment127.0
164.8
Other Commercial Real Estate Related168.1
130.8
   
Total Commercial Real Estate Loans$3,228.8
$3,482.7
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 127

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9 – Buildings and Equipment
A summary of buildingsBuildings and equipmentEquipment is presented below.in the following table.


TABLE 71:83: BUILDINGS AND EQUIPMENT
DECEMBER 31, 2018DECEMBER 31, 2020
(In Millions)
ORIGINAL
COST

ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION

NET BOOK
VALUE

(In Millions)ORIGINAL
COST
ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION
NET BOOK
VALUE
Land and Improvements$15.4
$1.1
$14.3
Land and Improvements$14.5 $0.5 $14.0 
Buildings245.7
148.2
97.5
Buildings257.8 163.0 94.8 
Equipment649.9
457.6
192.3
Equipment816.4 596.8 219.6 
Leasehold Improvements406.0
281.9
124.1
Leasehold Improvements523.9 337.4 186.5 
 
Total Buildings and Equipment$1,317.0
$888.8
$428.2
Total Buildings and Equipment$1,612.6 $1,097.7 $514.9 

DECEMBER 31, 2019
(In Millions)ORIGINAL
COST
ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION
NET BOOK
VALUE
Land and Improvements$14.5 $0.5 $14.0 
Buildings305.8 156.0 149.8 
Equipment731.0 521.5 209.5 
Leasehold Improvements416.1 306.1 110.0 
Total Buildings and Equipment$1,467.4 $984.1 $483.3 

124   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The charge for depreciation which includes depreciation of assets that were recorded under capital leasesamountedto $116.5 million in 2020, $103.2 million in 2019, and is included within occupancy expense$108.6 million in 2018 on the consolidated statements of income, amounted to $108.6 million in 2018, $101.2 million in 2017, and $89.2 million in 2016.income.
Note 10 – Lease Commitments
At December 31, 2018,2020, Northern Trust was obligated under a number of non-cancelable operating leases, primarily for buildings and equipment.real estate. Certain leases contain rent escalation clauses based on market indices, or increases in real estate taxes and other operating expenses and renewal option clauses calling for increased rentals.rentals, and rental payments based on usage. There are no restrictions imposed by any lease agreement regarding the payment of dividends, debt financing or Northern Trust entering into further lease agreements. Minimum annual
The components of lease commitmentscosts for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows.
TABLE 84: LEASE COST COMPONENTS
(In Millions)DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
Operating Lease Cost$119.4 $102.2 
Variable Lease Cost32.7 38.7 
Sublease Income(4.8)(6.6)
Total Lease Cost$147.3 $134.3 



128 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table presents a maturity analysis of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2018,2020.
TABLE 85: MATURITY OF LEASE LIABILITIES
(In Millions)MATURITY OF LEASE LIABILITIES
2021$99.1 
202292.6 
202385.6 
202474.7 
202577.0 
Later Years372.5 
Total Lease Payments801.5 
Less: Imputed Interest(100.9)
Present Value of Lease Liabilities$700.6 
As of December 31, 2020, Northern Trust had commitments for all non-cancelable operating leases in addition to the above that have not yet commenced for approximately $32.3 million. These operating leases are for the use of office space with lease terms between 10 and 15 years and are expected to commence during the first half of 2021.

Northern Trust uses its incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of lease payments for operating leases. Operating lease right-of-use (ROU) assets and lease liabilities may include options to extend or terminate the lease only when it is reasonably certain that Northern Trust will exercise that option. Northern Trust elects not to separate lease and non-lease components of a contract for its real estate leases. The location and amount of ROU assets and lease liabilities recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 are presented in the following table.

TABLE 86: LOCATION AND AMOUNT OF LEASE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(In Millions)LOCATION OF LEASE ASSETS AND LEASE LIABILITIES ON THE BALANCE SHEETDECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
Assets
Operating Lease Right-of-Use AssetOther Assets$560.5 $491.6 
Liabilities
Operating Lease LiabilityOther Liabilities$700.6 $603.1 

The weighted-average remaining lease term and weighted-average discount rate applied to leases as of one year or more areDecember 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:


TABLE 72: MINIMUM87: WEIGHTED-AVERAGE REMAINING LEASE PAYMENTSTERM AND DISCOUNT RATE
DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
Operating Leases
     Weighted-Average Remaining Lease Term10.0 years9.2 years
     Weighted-Average Discount Rate2.5 %3.0 %

The following table provides supplemental cash flow information related to leases for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
TABLE 88: SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(In Millions)DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
Supplemental cash flow information
     Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities - operating cash flows$107.9 $101.2 
Supplemental non-cash information
     Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities$164.8 $108.3 
(In Millions)
FUTURE MINIMUM
LEASE PAYMENTS

2019$98.8
202097.8
202185.9
202277.2
202367.7
Later Years335.7
  
Total Minimum Lease Payments763.1
Less: Sublease Rentals(23.4)
  
Net Minimum Lease Payments$739.7

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 129
Operating lease rental expense, net of rental income, is recorded in occupancy expense and amounted to $79.0 million in 2018, $76.7 million in 2017, and $76.1 million in 2016.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 11 – Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill. Changes by reporting segment in the carrying amount of goodwillGoodwill for the years ended December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, including the effect of foreign exchange rates on non-U.S.-dollar-denominatednon-U.S. dollar denominated balances, were as follows:follows.


TABLE 73:89: GOODWILL
(In Millions)CORPORATE & INSTITUTIONAL
SERVICES
WEALTH
MANAGEMENT
TOTAL
Balance at December 31, 2018$598.2 $71.1 $669.3 
Goodwill Acquired23.5 23.5 
Foreign Exchange Rates4.0 4.0 
Balance at December 31, 2019$625.7 $71.1 $696.8 
Foreign Exchange Rates10.3 0.1 10.4 
Balance at December 31, 2020$636.0 $71.2 $707.2 
(In Millions)
CORPORATE &
INSTITUTIONAL
SERVICES

WEALTH
MANAGEMENT

TOTAL
Balance at December 31, 2016$448.4
$71.0
$519.4
Goodwill Acquired78.3

78.3
Measurement Period Adjustments(1.3)
(1.3)
Foreign Exchange Rates9.1
0.1
9.2
    
Balance at December 31, 2017$534.5
$71.1
$605.6
Goodwill Acquired71.4

71.4
Foreign Exchange Rates(7.7)
(7.7)
    
Balance at December 31, 2018$598.2
$71.1
$669.3
The goodwill impairment test is performed at least annually at the reporting-unit level. The Corporation has determined its reporting units for this purpose to be Corporate & Institutional Services and Wealth Management. Goodwill was tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of 2020 using a quantitative assessment in which the estimated fair values of the reporting units are compared to their carrying values. Impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Based upon the quantitative assessments, there were no impairments to goodwill in 2020.



2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 125

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Other Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization. The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets subject to amortization as of December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 were as follows:follows.


TABLE 74:90: OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
                      DECEMBER 31,DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
(In Millions)20202019
Gross Carrying Amount$211.1
$222.7
Gross Carrying Amount$221.3 $207.2 
Less: Accumulated Amortization72.5
61.3
Less: Accumulated Amortization108.7 86.6 
 
Net Book Value$138.6
$161.4
Net Book Value$112.6 $120.6 
Other intangible assets consist primarily of the value of acquired client relationships and are included within other assets in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization expense related to other intangible assets was $17.4$16.9 million, $11.4$16.6 million, and $8.8$17.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. Amortization for the years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 20232025 is estimated to be $16.8$15.1 million, $16.8$10.5 million, $14.4$10.2 million, $9.8$10.1 million, and $9.5 million respectively.
In November 2018,the third quarter of 2019, Northern Trust completed its acquisition of BExBelvedere Advisors LLC, a provider of foreign exchange software solutions, for a total purchase price of $37.6 million, inclusive of cash consideration of $31.2 million paid in the fourth quarter of 2018. The related purchase accounting is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2019.
Since its acquisition of Omnium LLC in 2011, Northern Trust has made various investments in Citadel Technology LLC’s Omnium technology platform. In June 2018, Northern Trust completed its acquisition of such platform, along with associated development resources, for a total purchase price of $73.0 million. Goodwilldigital investment advisory and incremental software intangible assets associated with the acquisition in 2018 totaled $71.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
On October 1, 2017, Northern Trust completed its acquisition of UBS Asset Management’s fund administration servicing business in Luxembourg and Switzerland.asset management services. The purchase price recorded in connection with the closing of the acquisition, which wasis subject to adjustment through May 2018,certain performance-related adjustments over a five-year period after the acquisition date, totaled $191.3$17.6 million inclusive of contingent consideration. Goodwill and developed technology associated with the transaction totaled $9.3 million and $8.3 million, respectively.
In the first quarter of 2019, Northern Trust completed the purchase accounting related to its acquisition of BEx LLC, a provider of foreign exchange software solutions. The purchase price recorded in connection with the closing of the acquisition totaled $37.9 million. Goodwill and other intangible assetsdeveloped technology associated with the acquisition totaled $78.3$12.5 million and $126.0$25.0 million, respectively.


Capitalized Software. The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of capitalized software as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows.

TABLE 91: CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE
DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
Gross Carrying Amount$4,337.4 $3,885.2 
Less: Accumulated Amortization2,744.5 2,377.9 
Net Book Value$1,592.9 $1,507.3 




126   2018130 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Capitalized software, which is included in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheet, consists primarily of purchased software, software licenses, and allowable internal costs, including compensation relating to software developed for internal use. Fees paid for the use of software licenses that are not hosted by Northern Trust are expensed as incurred. Amortization expense, which is included in Equipment and Software on the consolidated statements of income, amounted to $366.9 million in 2020, $339.1 million in 2019, and $334.9 million in 2018.
Note 12 – Deposits
The following table provides the scheduled maturity of total time deposits in denominations of $250,000 or greater at December 31, 2020.
TABLE 92: REMAINING MATURITY OF TIME DEPOSITS $250,000 OR MORE
DECEMBER 31, 2020
U.S. OFFICENON-U.S. OFFICES
(In Millions)CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSITOTHER TIMETOTAL
1 Year or Less$660.2 $205.4 $865.6 
Over 1 Year to 2 Years36.1 0 36.1 
Over 2 Years to 3 Years3.1 0 3.1 
Over 3 Years to 4 Years1.2 0 1.2 
Over 4 Years to 5 Years0.3 0 0.3 
Over 5 Years0.5 0 0.5 
Total$701.4 $205.4 $906.8 

As of December 31, 2019, there were $1.7 billion of time deposits in denominations of $250,000 or greater, of which $711.4 million were Certificates of Deposit and $1.0 billion were non-U.S.
Note 13 – Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt
Senior Notes. A summary of Senior Notes outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019 is presented in the following table.

TABLE 93: SENIOR NOTES
DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)RATE20202019
Corporation-Senior Notes(1)
Fixed Rate Due Nov. 2020(2)
3.45 %$0 $499.9 
Fixed Rate Due Aug. 2021(2)
3.375 499.8 499.4 
Fixed Rate Due Aug. 2022(2)
2.375 499.6 499.4 
Fixed Rate Due Aug. 2028(3)(4)
3.65 584.4 547.2 
Fixed Rate Due May 2029(3)(4)
3.15 567.9 527.1 
Fixed Rate Due May 2030(3)(4)
1.95 970.7 
Total Senior Notes$3,122.4 $2,573.0 
(1) As of December 31, 2020, debt issuance costs of $3.4 million are included as a direct deduction from the carrying amount and amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the Note.
(2) Not redeemable prior to maturity.
(3) Redeemable within three months of maturity.
(4) Interest rate swap contracts were entered into to modify the interest expense from fixed rates to floating rates. The swaps are recorded as fair value hedges and increases in the carrying values of senior notes outstanding atof $130.7 million and $77.1 million were recorded as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017 is presented below.2019, respectively. See further detail in Note 27, “Derivative Financial Instruments.”


TABLE 75: SENIOR NOTES
                       DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)RATE
2018
2017
Corporation-Senior Notes(1)(4)
   
Fixed Rate Due Nov. 2020(5)
3.45%$499.7
$499.6
Fixed Rate Due Aug. 2021(6)
3.38
499.1
498.8
Fixed Rate Due Aug. 2022(7)
2.38
499.2
498.9
Fixed Rate Due Aug. 2028(8)(11)
3.65
513.3

    
Total Senior Notes $2,011.3
$1,497.3

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 131

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Long-Term Debt. A summary of long-term debtLong-Term Debt outstanding at December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 is presented below.in the following table.


TABLE 76:94: LONG-TERM DEBT
DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)RATE20202019
Corporation-Subordinated Debt(1)
Fixed Rate Notes due Oct. 2025(2)(3)
3.95 %$839.8 $798.7 
Fixed-to-Floating Rate Notes due May 2032(4)
3.375 349.5 349.4 
Total Long-Term Debt$1,189.3 $1,148.1 
Long-Term Debt Qualifying as Risk-Based Capital$949.7 $1,099.5 
                       DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)2018
2017
Bank-Subordinated Debt(1)(3)(4)(11)
  
6.50% Notes due Aug. 2018(9)
$
$305.5
   
Corporation-Subordinated Debt(4)
  
3.95% Notes due Oct. 2025(1)(10)(11)
763.1
780.4
3.375% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Notes due May 2032(2)
349.3
349.2
   
Total Corporation Subordinated Debt1,112.4
1,129.6
   
Capital Lease Obligations
14.4
   
Total Long-Term Debt$1,112.4
$1,449.5
   
Long-Term Debt Qualifying as Risk-Based Capital$1,099.5
$1,099.4
(1) As of December 31, 2020, debt issuance costs of $1.1 million are included as a direct deduction from the carrying amount and amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the Note.

(1) (2) Not redeemable prior to maturity, except for seniormaturity.
(3) Interest rate swap contracts were entered into to modify the interest expense from fixed rates to floating rates. The swaps are recorded as fair value hedges and increases in the carrying values of the subordinated notes due Aug. 2028, which are redeemable within three monthsoutstanding of maturity.$90.8 million and $49.8 million were recorded as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See further detail in Note 27, “Derivative Financial Instruments.”
(2)(4) The subordinated notes will bear interest from the date they were issued to, but excluding, May 8, 2027, at an annual rate of 3.375%, payable semi-annually in arrears. From, and including, May 8, 2027, the subordinated notes will bear interest at an annual rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 1.131%, payable quarterly in arrears. The subordinated notes are unsecured and may be redeemed, in whole but not in part, on, and only on, May 8, 2027, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the subordinated notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, up to but excluding the redemption date.
(3) Under the terms of its current Offering Circular dated November 6, 2013, the Bank has the ability to offer from time to time its senior bank notes in an aggregate principal amount of up to $4.5 billion at any one time outstanding and up to an additional $1.0 billion of subordinated notes. Each senior note will mature from 30 days to 15 years, and each subordinated note will mature from 5 years to 15 years, following its date of original issuance. Each note will mature on such date as selected by the initial purchaser and agreed to by the Bank.
(4) As of December 31, 2018, debt issue costs of $1.6 million and $1.4 million are included as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt, respectively. Debt issue costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the Note.
(5) Notes issued at a discount of 0.117%
(6) Notes issued at a discount of 0.437%
(7) Notes issued at a discount of 0.283%
(8) Notes issued at a discount of 0.125%
(9) Notes issued at a discount of 0.02%
(10) Notes issued at a discount of 0.114%
(11) Interest rate swap contracts were entered into to modify the interest expense on these senior and subordinated notes from fixed rates to floating rates. The swaps are recorded as fair value hedges and at December 31, 2018, increases in the carrying values of the senior and subordinated notes outstanding of $29.3 million were recorded. As of December 31, 2017, net adjustments in the carrying values of subordinated notes outstanding of $37.4 million were recorded.
Note 1314 – Floating Rate Capital Debt
In January 1997, the Corporation issued $150 million of Floating Rate Capital Securities, Series A, through a statutory business trust wholly owned by the Corporation (NTC Capital I). In April 1997, the Corporation also issued, through a separate wholly owned statutory business trust (NTC Capital II), $120 million of Floating Rate Capital Securities, Series B. The sole assets of the trusts are subordinated debentures of Northern Trust Corporation that have the same interest rates and

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 127

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

maturity dates as the corresponding distribution rates and redemption dates of the Floating Rate Capital Securities. The Series A Securitiessecurities were issued at a discount to yield 60.5 basis points above the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and are due January 15, 2027. The Series B Securitiessecurities were issued at a discount to yield 67.9 basis points above the three-month LIBOR and are due April 15, 2027.
Under the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the regulatory capital treatment of these securities is required to be phased out over a period that began on January 1, 2013. In 2018, 40%2020, 20% of these securities arewas eligible for Tier 2 capital treatment, declining at an incremental 10% a year until they are fully phased out in 2022.
The Corporation has fully, irrevocably and unconditionally guaranteed all payments due on the Series A and B securities. The holders of the Series A and B securities are entitled to receive preferential cumulative cash distributions quarterly in arrears (based on the liquidation amount of $1,000 per security) at an interest rate equal to the rate on the corresponding subordinated debentures. The interest rate on the Series A and Series B securities is equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.52% and 0.59%, respectively. Subject to certain exceptions, the Corporation has the right to defer payment of interest on the subordinated debentures at any time or from time to time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarterly periods provided that no extension period may extend beyond the stated maturity date. If interest is deferred on the subordinated debentures, distributions on the Series A and B securities will also be deferred and the Corporation will not be permitted, subject to certain exceptions, to pay or declare any cash distributions with respect to the Corporation’s capital stock or debt securities that rank the same as or junior to the subordinated debentures, until all past due distributions are paid. The subordinated debentures are unsecured and subordinated to substantially all of the Corporation’s existing indebtedness.
The Corporation has the right to redeem the Series A and Series B subordinated debentures, in whole or in part, at a price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The following table summarizes the book values of the outstanding subordinated debentures as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


TABLE 77:95: SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
NTC Capital I Subordinated Debentures due January 15, 2027$154.3 $154.3 
NTC Capital II Subordinated Debentures due April 15, 2027123.5 123.4 
Total Subordinated Debentures$277.8 $277.7 



132 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
NTC Capital I Subordinated Debentures due January 15, 2027$154.2
$154.2
NTC Capital II Subordinated Debentures due April 15, 2027123.4
123.3
   
Total Subordinated Debentures$277.6
$277.5

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1415 – Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred Stock. The Corporation is authorized to issue 10 million shares of preferred stock without par value. The Board of Directors is authorized to fix the particular designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions for each series of preferred stock issued.
As of December 31, 2018,2020, 5,000 shares of Series D Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Stock”) and 16,000 shares of Series E Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series E Preferred Stock”) were outstanding.
Series D Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2020, the Corporation had issued and outstanding 500,000 depositary shares, each representing a 1/100th ownership interest in a share of Series D Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, (the “Series D Preferred Stock”) issued in August 2016. Equity related to Series D Preferred Stock as of December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 was $493.5 million. Shares of the Series D Preferred Stock have no0 par value and a liquidation preference of $100,000 (equivalent to $1,000 per depositary share).
Dividends on the Series D Preferred Stock, which are not mandatory, accrue and are payable on the liquidation preference amount, on a non-cumulative basis, at a rate per annum equal to (i) 4.60% from the original issue date of the Series D Preferred Stock to but excluding October 1, 2026; and (ii) a floating rate equal to Three-Month LIBOR plus 3.202% from and including October 1, 2026. Fixed rate dividends are payable in arrears on the 1stfirst day of April and October of each year, through and including October 1, 2026, and floating rate dividends will be payable in arrears on the 1stfirst day of January, April, July and October of each year, commencing on January 1, 2027.
The Series D Preferred Stock has no maturity date and is redeemable at the Corporation’s option in whole, or in part, on any dividend payment date on or after October 1, 2026. The Series D Preferred Stock is redeemable at the Corporation’s option in whole, but not in part, including prior to October 1, 2026, within 90 days of a regulatory capital treatment event, as described in the Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation.
Shares of the Series D Preferred Stock rank senior to the Corporation’s common stock, and will rank at least equally with any other series of preferred stock it may issue (except for any senior series that may be issued with the requisite consent of the holders of the Series D Preferred Stock) and all other parity stock, with respect to the payment of dividends and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Series E Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Corporation also had issued and outstanding 16 million depositary shares, each representing 1/1000th1,000th ownership interest in a share of Series E Preferred Stock, issued in November 2019. On January 2, 2020, the proceeds from the Series E Preferred Stock were used to fund the redemption of all outstanding shares of the Corporation’s Series C Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), issued in August 2014.Stock. Equity related to Series CE Preferred Stock as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017 totaled $388.5 million.2019 was $391.4 million, which represents the net aggregate proceeds from the public offering of the depositary shares. Shares of the Series CE Preferred Stock has nohave 0 par value and has a liquidation preference of $25,000 (equivalent to $25 per depositary share).
Dividends on the Series CE Preferred Stock, which are not mandatory, accrue and are payable on the liquidation preference amount, on a non-cumulative basis, quarterly in arrears on the first day of January, April, July and October of each year, at a rate per annum equal to 5.85%4.70%. On October 20, 2020, the Corporation declared a cash dividend of $293.75 per share of Series E Preferred Stock payable on January 1, 2021, to stockholders of record as of December 15, 2020.

The Series E Preferred Stock has no maturity date and is redeemable at the Corporation’s option in whole, or in part, on any dividend payment date on or after January 1, 2025. The Series E Preferred Stock is redeemable at the Corporation’s option in whole, but not in part, including prior to January 1, 2025, within 90 days of a regulatory capital treatment event, as described in the Series E Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation.
128   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Common Stock.the Series E Preferred Stock repurchases through July 17, 2018 were made pursuantrank senior to the repurchase program announced byCorporation’s common stock, and will rank at least equally with any other series of preferred stock it may issue (except for any senior series that may be issued with the Corporation onrequisite consent of the holders of the Series E Preferred Stock) and all other parity stock, with respect to the payment of dividends and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Common Stock. In July 18, 2017, under which2018, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized the Corporation toapproved a stock repurchase up to 9.5 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock. This program was terminated and replaced with a new repurchase program, announced on July 17, 2018, under which the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized the Corporationauthorization to repurchase up to 25.0 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock. Repurchases after July 17, 2018 were made pursuant to the new repurchase program. Shares are repurchased by the Corporation to, among other things, manage the Corporation'sCorporation’s capital levels. Repurchased shares are used for general purposes, including the issuance of shares under stock option and other incentive plans. The new repurchase authorization approved by the Board of Directors has no expiration date.
Under the Corporation’s 2018 Capital Plan, which was reviewed without objection by the Federal Reserve, The Corporation suspended this program on March 16, 2020. Subsequent to the Corporation maysuspending its open-market share repurchase up to $529.5 millionprogram, the only shares repurchased were shares of common stock afterwithheld upon the vesting of share-based compensation to satisfy tax withholding obligations. During the year ended December 31, 2018 through June 30, 2019.2020, the Corporation repurchased 3,276,589 shares of common stock, including 532,713 shares withheld related to share-based compensation, at a total cost of $299.8 million.
The average price paid per share for common stock repurchased in 2020, 2019, and 2018 2017,was $91.49, $93.40, and 2016 was $102.69, $90.25,respectively.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 133

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, the Federal Reserve announced certain measures to ensure that large financial institutions, including Northern Trust, remain resilient despite the economic uncertainty resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, for the third and $67.91, respectively.fourth quarters of 2020, no share repurchases were permitted by these institutions and dividend payments were limited to the amount paid in the second quarter and could not exceed the payor’s average net income for the four preceding quarters. On December 18, 2020, the Federal Reserve again extended its capital distribution limits into the first quarter of 2021 with certain modifications, which include continuing to limit dividend payments based on recent income and limiting share repurchases based on recent income. During the first quarter of 2021, the Corporation restarted its share repurchase program in accordance with such limitations.
An analysis of changes in the number of shares of common stock outstanding follows:


TABLE 78:96: SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
202020192018
Balance at January 1209,709,046 219,012,050 226,126,674 
Incentive Plan and Awards1,512,035 1,688,931 1,310,778 
Stock Options Exercised344,686 786,931 575,662 
Treasury Stock Purchased(3,276,589)(11,778,866)(9,001,064)
Balance at December 31208,289,178 209,709,046 219,012,050 




134 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

 2018
2017
2016
Balance at January 1226,126,674
228,605,485
229,293,783
Incentive Plan and Awards1,310,778
1,320,129
1,209,124
Stock Options Exercised575,662
1,997,362
4,156,728
Treasury Stock Purchased(9,001,064)(5,796,302)(6,054,150)
    
Balance at December 31219,012,050
226,126,674
228,605,485
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1516 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following tables summarize the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (AOCI) at December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, and changes during the years then ended.


TABLE 79:97: SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In Millions)
NET UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON DEBT SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE(1)
NET UNREALIZED (LOSSES) GAINS ON CASH FLOW HEDGESNET FOREIGN CURRENCY ADJUSTMENTNET PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT ADJUSTMENTSTOTAL
Balance at December 31, 2017$(74.8)$4.5 $(1.8)$(342.2)$(414.3)
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from AOCI(17.8)0.9 47.5 (55.9)(25.3)
Net Change(22.3)(1.4)22.2 (12.6)(14.1)
Balance at December 31, 2018$(114.9)$4.0 $67.9 $(410.7)$(453.7)
Net Change228.9 (7.7)49.9 (12.1)259.0 
Balance at December 31, 2019$114.0 $(3.7)$117.8 $(422.8)$(194.7)
Net Change527.8 0.5 26.9 67.5 622.7 
Balance at December 31, 2020$641.8 $(3.2)$144.7 $(355.3)$428.0 
(In Millions)BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2018
NET
CHANGE

RECLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
TAX EFFECTS FROM AOCI
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2017
NET
CHANGE

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2016
NET
CHANGE

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2015
Net Unrealized (Losses) Gains on Debt Securities Available for Sale*$(114.9)$(22.3)$(17.8)$(74.8)$(42.4)$(32.4)$(1.4)$(31.0)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges4.0
(1.4)0.9
4.5
(1.6)6.1
9.1
(3.0)
Net Foreign Currency Adjustments67.9
22.2
47.5
(1.8)16.7
(18.5)(0.9)(17.6)
Net Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments(410.7)(12.6)(55.9)(342.2)(17.0)(325.2)(4.1)(321.1)
         
Total$(453.7)$(14.1)$(25.3)$(414.3)$(44.3)$(370.0)$2.7
$(372.7)
*(1) Includes net unrealized gains (losses) on debt securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity during the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019, and 2017.2018.


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 129

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE 80:98: DETAILS OF CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
202020192018
(In Millions)BEFORE
TAX
TAX
EFFECT
AFTER
TAX
BEFORE
TAX
TAX
EFFECT
AFTER
TAX
BEFORE
TAX
TAX
EFFECT
AFTER
TAX
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Debt Securities Available for Sale
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Debt Securities Available for Sale$706.8 $(179.3)$527.5 $306.1 $(78.0)$228.1 $(31.9)$9.2 $(22.7)
Reclassification Adjustment for Losses (Gains) Included in Net Income(1)
0.4 (0.1)0.3 1.1 (0.3)0.8 0.5 (0.1)0.4 
Net Change$707.2 $(179.4)$527.8 $307.2 $(78.3)$228.9 $(31.4)$9.1 $(22.3)
Unrealized (Losses) Gains on Cash Flow Hedges
Foreign Exchange Contracts$28.9 $(7.3)$21.6 $14.9 $(3.7)$11.2 $70.5 $(17.6)$52.9 
Interest Rate Contracts0 0 0 1.5 (0.3)1.2 (1.2)0.3 (0.9)
Reclassification Adjustment for (Gains) Losses Included in Net Income(2)
(28.1)7.0 (21.1)(26.7)6.6 (20.1)(71.1)17.7 (53.4)
Net Change$0.8 $(0.3)$0.5 $(10.3)$2.6 $(7.7)$(1.8)$0.4 $(1.4)
Foreign Currency Adjustments
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments$169.1 $(8.3)$160.8 $6.4 $(1.6)$4.8 $(107.8)$1.5 $(106.3)
Long-Term Intra-Entity Foreign Currency Transaction (Losses) Gains2.1 (0.5)1.6 (0.5)0.1 (0.4)(1.8)0.5 (1.3)
Net Investment Hedge Gains (Losses)(178.7)43.2 (135.5)59.7 (14.2)45.5 173.0 (43.2)129.8 
Net Change$(7.5)$34.4 $26.9 $65.6 $(15.7)$49.9 $63.4 $(41.2)$22.2 
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments
Net Actuarial (Losses) Gains$47.4 $(12.3)$35.1 $(36.8)$7.9 $(28.9)$(54.9)$9.6 $(45.3)
Reclassification Adjustment for Losses (Gains) Included in Net Income(3)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss43.0 (10.5)32.5 22.4 (5.4)17.0 36.6 (3.6)33.0 
Amortization of Prior Service Cost(0.1)0 (0.1)(0.2)(0.2)(0.3)(0.3)
Net Change$90.3 $(22.8)$67.5 $(14.6)$2.5 $(12.1)$(18.6)$6.0 $(12.6)
Total Net Change$790.8 $(168.1)$622.7 $347.9 $(88.9)$259.0 $11.6 $(25.7)$(14.1)
(1) The before-tax reclassification adjustment out of AOCI related to the realized gains (losses) on debt securities available for sale is recorded in Investment Security Gains (Losses), net on the consolidated statements of income.
(2) See Note 27, "Derivative Financial Instruments" for the location of the reclassification adjustment related to cash flow hedges.
(3) The before-tax reclassification adjustment out of AOCI related to pension and other postretirement benefit adjustments is recorded in Employee Benefits expense on the consolidated statements of income.
 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
 201820172016
(In Millions)
BEFORE
TAX

TAX
EFFECT

AFTER
TAX

BEFORE
TAX

TAX
EFFECT

AFTER
TAX

BEFORE
TAX

TAX
EFFECT

AFTER
TAX

Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Debt Securities Available for Sale     
Unrealized (Losses) Gains on Debt Securities Available for Sale$(31.9)$9.2
$(22.7)$(70.2)$26.9
$(43.3)$(1.8)$0.7
$(1.1)
Reclassification Adjustment for (Gains) Losses Included in Net Income0.5
(0.1)0.4
1.4
(0.5)0.9
(0.5)0.2
(0.3)
          
Net Change$(31.4)$9.1
$(22.3)$(68.8)$26.4
$(42.4)$(2.3)$0.9
$(1.4)
Unrealized (Losses) Gains on Cash Flow Hedges     
Foreign Exchange Contracts

$70.5
$(17.6)$52.9
$32.5
$(19.5)$13.0
$3.1
$4.2
$7.3
Interest Rate Contracts(1.2)0.3
(0.9)1.3
(0.8)0.5
1.3
1.7
3.0
Reclassification Adjustment for (Gains) Losses Included in Net Income(71.1)17.7
(53.4)(24.5)9.4
(15.1)(1.9)0.7
(1.2)
          
Net Change$(1.8)$0.4
$(1.4)$9.3
$(10.9)$(1.6)$2.5
$6.6
$9.1
Foreign Currency Adjustments     
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments$(107.8)$1.5
$(106.3)$156.5
$(3.1)$153.4
$(126.5)$(3.1)$(129.6)
Long-Term Intra-Entity Foreign Currency Transaction Losses(1.8)0.5
(1.3)2.0
(0.7)1.3
(5.3)2.0
(3.3)
Net Investment Hedge Gains (Losses)173.0
(43.2)129.8
(223.2)85.2
(138.0)212.4
(80.4)132.0
          
Net Change$63.4
$(41.2)$22.2
$(64.7)$81.4
$16.7
$80.6
$(81.5)$(0.9)
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments     
Net Actuarial Gains (Losses)$(54.9)$9.6
$(45.3)$(58.4)$25.4
$(33.0)$(31.1)$11.2
$(19.9)
Reclassification Adjustment for Losses Included in Net Income36.3
(3.6)32.7
25.9
(9.9)16.0
25.4
(9.6)15.8
          
Net Change$(18.6)$6.0
$(12.6)$(32.5)$15.5
$(17.0)$(5.7)$1.6
$(4.1)


130   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation135


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table provides the location and before-tax amounts of reclassifications out of AOCI during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

TABLE 81: RECLASSIFICATION ADJUSTMENT OUT OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Millions)
LOCATION OF
RECLASSIFICATION ADJUSTMENTS
RECOGNIZED IN INCOME
AMOUNT OF RECLASSIFICATION
ADJUSTMENTS RECOGNIZED
IN INCOME
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
201820172016
Debt Securities Available for Sale    
Realized Losses (Gains) on Debt Securities Available for SaleInvestment Security Losses, net$0.5
$1.4
$(0.5)
     
Realized (Gains) Losses on Cash Flow Hedges    
Foreign Exchange ContractsOther Operating Income(3.9)(5.0)6.4
 Interest Income(67.4)(19.3)(6.4)
 Other Operating Expense
0.1
0.9
Interest Rate ContractsInterest Income0.2
(0.3)(2.8)
     
Total Realized (Gains) on Cash Flow Hedges (71.1)(24.5)(1.9)
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments    
Amortization of Net Actuarial LossesEmployee Benefits36.6
26.0
25.6
Amortization of Prior Service CostEmployee Benefits(0.3)(0.1)(0.2)
     
Gross Reclassification Adjustment $36.3
$25.9
$25.4
Note 1617 – Net Income per Common Share
The computations of net income per common share are presented below.in the following table.


TABLE 82:99: NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions Except Per Common Share Information)2018
2017
2016
($ In Millions Except Per Common Share Information)202020192018
BASIC NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE BASIC NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding223,148,335
228,257,664
227,580,584
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding208,319,412 214,525,547 223,148,335 
Net Income$1,556.4
$1,199.0
$1,032.5
Net Income$1,209.3 $1,492.2 $1,556.4 
Less: Dividends on Preferred Stock46.4
49.8
23.4
Less: Dividends on Preferred Stock56.2 46.4 46.4 
 
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock$1,510.0
$1,149.2
$1,009.1
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock1,153.1 1,445.8 1,510.0 
Less: Earnings Allocated to Participating Securities20.1
18.8
18.7
Less: Earnings Allocated to Participating Securities12.1 16.9 20.1 
 
Earnings Allocated to Common Shares Outstanding1,489.9
1,130.4
990.4
Earnings Allocated to Common Shares Outstanding$1,141.0 $1,428.9 $1,489.9 
Basic Net Income Per Common Share6.68
4.95
4.35
Basic Net Income Per Common Share5.48 6.66 6.68 
 
DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding223,148,335
228,257,664
227,580,584
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding208,319,412 214,525,547 223,148,335 
Plus Dilutive Effect of Share-based Compensation1,339,991
1,396,737
1,570,822
Plus Dilutive Effect of Share-based Compensation688,574 1,075,602 1,339,991 
 
Average Common and Potential Common Shares224,488,326
229,654,401
229,151,406
Average Common and Potential Common Shares209,007,986 215,601,149 224,488,326 
 
Earnings Allocated to Common and Potential Common Shares$1,490.0
$1,130.5
$990.4
Earnings Allocated to Common and Potential Common Shares$1,141.1 $1,428.9 $1,490.0 
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share6.64
4.92
4.32
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share5.46 6.63 6.64 
Note: For the yearyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, there were no0 common stock equivalents excluded in the computation of diluted net income per share. Common stock equivalents of 115,491, and 1,108,067 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 131

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1718 – Revenue from Contracts with Clients
Trust, Investment, and Other Servicing Fees. Custody and fund administration income is comprised of revenues received from our core asset servicing business for providing custody, fund administration, and middle-office-related services, primarily to C&IS clients. Investment management and advisory income contains revenue received from providing asset management and related services to Wealth Management and C&IS clients and to Northern Trust sponsored funds. Securities lending income represents revenues generated from securities lending arrangements that Northern Trust enters into as agent, mainly with C&IS clients. Other income largely consists of revenues received from providing employee benefit, investment risk and analytic and other services to C&IS and Wealth Management clients.
Other Noninterest Income. Treasury management income represents revenues received from providing cash and liquidity management services to C&IS and Wealth Management clients. The portion of securities commissionsSecurity Commissions and trading incomeTrading Income that relates to revenue from contracts with clients is primarily comprised of commissions earned from providing securities brokerage services to Wealth Management and C&IS clients. The portion of other operating incomeOther Operating Income that relates to revenue from contracts with clients is mainly comprised of service fees for banking-related services provided to Wealth Management and C&IS clients.
Performance Obligations. Clients are typically charged monthly or quarterly in arrears based on the fee arrangement agreed to with each client; payment terms will vary depending on the client and services offered.
Substantially all revenues generated from contracts with clients for asset servicing, asset management, securities lending, treasury management and banking-related services are recognized on an accrual basis, over the period in which services are provided. The nature of Northern Trust’s performance obligations is to provide a series of distinct services in which the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of the promised services as they are performed. Fee arrangements are mainly comprised of variable amounts based on market value of client assets managed and serviced, transaction volumes, number of accounts, and securities lending volume and spreads. Revenue is recognized using the output method in an amount that reflects the consideration to which Northern Trust expects to be entitled in exchange for providing each month or quarter of service. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, revenue is allocated to each performance obligation based on the price agreed to with the client, representing its relative standalone selling price.
Security brokerage revenue is primarily represented by securities commissions received in exchange of providing trade execution related services. Control is transferred at a point in time, on the trade date of the transaction, and fees are typically variable based on transaction volumes and security types.



136 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Northern Trust’s contracts with its clients are typically open endedopen-ended arrangements and are therefore considered to have an original duration of less than one year. Northern Trust has elected the practical expedient to not disclose the value of remaining performance obligations for contracts with an original expected duration of one year or less.


132   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents revenues disaggregated by major revenue source.


TABLE 83:100: REVENUE DISAGGREGATION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018(In Millions)202020192018
Noninterest Income Noninterest Income
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees  Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees
Custody and Fund Administration$1,589.1
Custody and Fund Administration$1,674.3 $1,636.4 $1,589.1 
Investment Management and Advisory1,862.6
Investment Management and Advisory2,029.3 1,930.6 1,862.6 
Securities Lending102.8
Securities Lending88.3 87.7 102.8 
Other199.2
Other203.1 197.4 199.2 
 
Total Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,753.7
Total Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,995.0 $3,852.1 $3,753.7 
Other Noninterest Income Other Noninterest Income
Foreign Exchange Income$307.2
Treasury Management51.8
Securities Commissions and Trading Income98.3
Foreign Exchange Trading Income Foreign Exchange Trading Income$290.4 $250.9 $307.2 
Treasury Management Fees Treasury Management Fees45.4 44.5 51.8 
Security Commissions and Trading Income Security Commissions and Trading Income133.2 103.6 98.3 
Other Operating Income127.5
Other Operating Income194.0 145.5 127.5 
Investment Security Losses, net(1.0)
 
Investment Security Gains (Losses), net Investment Security Gains (Losses), net(0.4)(1.4)(1.0)
Total Other Noninterest Income$583.8
Total Other Noninterest Income$662.6 $543.1 $583.8 
 
Total Noninterest Income$4,337.5
Total Noninterest Income$4,657.6 $4,395.2 $4,337.5 
On the consolidated statements of income, Trust, investmentInvestment and other servicing feesOther Servicing Fees and treasury management feesTreasury Management Fees represent revenue from contracts with clients. RevenueFor the year ended December 31, 2020, revenue from contracts with clients also includes $102.4 million of the $133.2 million total Security Commissions and Trading Income and $42.8 million of the $194.0 million total Other Operating Income. For the year ended December 31, 2019, revenue from contracts with clients also includes $87.1 million of the $103.6 million total Security Commissions and Trading Income and $41.8 million of the $145.5 million total Other Operating Income. For the year ended December 31, 2018, revenue from contracts with clients also includes $86.7 million of the $98.3 million total securities commissionsSecurity Commissions and trading incomeTrading Income and $44.0 million of the $127.5 million total other operating income in 2018.Other Operating Income.
Receivables Balances. The following table below represents receivables balances from contracts with clients, which are included in other assets inOther Assets on the consolidated balance sheets, at December 31, 20182020 and 2019.
TABLE 101: CLIENT RECEIVABLES
DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
Trust Fees Receivable, net(1)
$819.3 $801.9 
Other116.5 101.1 
Total Client Receivables$935.8 $903.0 
(1) Trust Fees Receivable is net of a $7.2 million and $5.6 million fee receivable allowance as of December 31, 2017.
TABLE 84: CLIENT RECEIVABLES
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
Trust Fees Receivable, net (1)
$742.5
$629.7
Other90.1
79.0
Total Client Receivables$832.6
$708.7

(1) The net trust fees receivable balance at December 31, 2017 does not reflect the reduction for the estate settlement revenue transition adjustment of $2.7 million, which was recorded with an effective date of January 1, 2018.

2020 and 2019, respectively.
20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 133137

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1819 – Net Interest Income
The components of net interest incomeNet Interest Income were as follows:


TABLE 85:102: NET INTEREST INCOME
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
(In Millions)202020192018
Interest Income Interest Income
Loans and Leases$1,098.8
$919.1
$806.5
Loans and Leases$774.6 $1,153.4 $1,098.8 
Securities – Taxable905.2
594.1
428.8
Securities – Taxable812.4 1,070.7 905.2 
– Non-Taxable7.0
9.8
7.5
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks (1)
70.0
63.8
64.3
– Non-Taxable(1)
– Non-Taxable(1)
1.4 3.8 7.0 
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(2)
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(2)
22.4 72.4 70.0 
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other240.4
182.6
109.8
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits and Other32.7 199.6 240.4 
 
Total Interest Income$2,321.4
$1,769.4
$1,416.9
Total Interest Income$1,643.5 $2,499.9 $2,321.4 
 
Interest Expense Interest Expense
Deposits$384.6
$182.1
$83.5
Deposits$48.4 $488.9 $384.6 
Federal Funds Purchased50.3
10.4
1.5
Federal Funds Purchased2.2 25.9 50.3 
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase7.8
6.0
2.3
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase1.0 6.4 7.8 
Other Borrowings150.1
50.7
18.0
Other Borrowings45.3 181.7 150.1 
Senior Notes53.4
46.9
46.8
Senior Notes72.7 72.6 53.4 
Long-Term Debt45.0
39.2
26.4
Long-Term Debt26.5 38.3 45.0 
Floating Rate Capital Debt7.5
4.9
3.5
Floating Rate Capital Debt4.2 8.2 7.5 
 
Total Interest Expense$698.7
$340.2
$182.0
Total Interest Expense$200.3 $822.0 $698.7 
 
Net Interest Income$1,622.7
$1,429.2
$1,234.9
Net Interest Income$1,443.2 $1,677.9 $1,622.7 

(1) Non-Taxable Securities represent securities that are exempt from U.S. federal income taxes.
(1) (2) Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks includes the interest-bearing component of Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks as presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
Note 1920 – Other Operating Income
The components of other operating incomeOther Operating Income were as follows:


TABLE 86:103: OTHER OPERATING INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
Loan Service Fees$52.5 $48.0 $48.9 
Banking Service Fees46.1 45.6 46.4 
Other Income95.4 51.9 32.2 
Total Other Operating Income$194.0 $145.5 $127.5 

                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Loan Service Fees$48.9
$50.7
$56.6
Banking Service Fees46.4
48.6
50.6
Other Income32.2
58.2
134.0
    
Total Other Operating Income$127.5
$157.5
$241.2


Other income totaled $32.2 millionOperating Income in 2018, down2020 increased from $58.2 million in 2017,2019, primarily due to the impairment of a community development equity investment previously held at cost, expenseshigher income related to existing swap agreementsa bank-owned life insurance program implemented during 2019, a charge in the prior year related to Visa Inc. Class B common shares,the decision made to sell substantially all of the lease portfolio, and the net impact of various other operating income categories. Other income in 2016 included a $123.1 million net gain on the sale of 1.1 million Visa Class B common shares.

higher miscellaneous income.



134   2018138 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 2021 – Other Operating Expense
The components of other operating expenseOther Operating Expense were as follows:


TABLE 87:104: OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE

                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
(In Millions)202020192018
Business Promotion$98.3
$95.4
$83.6
Business Promotion$59.2 $104.2 $98.3 
Staff RelatedStaff Related29.4 42.8 33.6 
FDIC Insurance Premiums27.4
34.7
31.7
FDIC Insurance Premiums11.8 9.9 27.4 
Staff Related33.6
42.8
43.0
Other Intangibles Amortization17.4
11.4
8.8
Other Intangibles Amortization16.9 16.6 17.4 
Other Expenses153.9
147.3
197.3
Other Expenses229.4 156.3 153.9 
 
Total Other Operating Expense$330.6
$331.6
$364.4
Total Other Operating Expense$346.7 $329.8 $330.6 


Other expensesOperating Expense in 2016 included2020 increased from 2019 primarily due to a charge in connection with an agreement to settle certain securities lending litigation of $50.0$43.4 million and chargescharge related to contractual modifications associated with existing C&IS clients of $18.6 million.a corporate action processing error as well as increases in mutual fund co-administration fees, partially offset by lower business promotion expense due to reduced business travel and lower staff-related expense.
Note 2122 – Income Taxes
The following table reconciles the total provision for income taxes recorded in the consolidated statements of incomestatutory federal tax rate with the amounts computed at the statutory federaleffective tax rate for the periods presented below.


TABLE 88:105: INCOME TAXES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,202020192018
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Federal Rate21.0%35.0%35.0%
Tax at Statutory Rate$411.1
$571.9
$531.0
Statutory Federal Tax RateStatutory Federal Tax Rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Tax Exempt Income(6.9)(9.6)(7.2)Tax Exempt Income(0.9)(0.6)(0.4)
Foreign Tax Rate Differential(7.3)(50.0)(50.9)Foreign Tax Rate Differential0.7 0.2 (0.4)
Excess Tax Benefit Related to Share-Based Compensation(16.8)(31.6)(12.3)Excess Tax Benefit Related to Share-Based Compensation(0.6)(0.9)(0.9)
Tax CreditsTax Credits(1.7)(1.0)(1.1)
Reversal of Tax Benefits Previously Recognized through EarningsReversal of Tax Benefits Previously Recognized through Earnings1.6 
State Taxes, net65.5
41.0
31.1
State Taxes, net3.2 2.8 3.4 
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act(4.8)(53.1)
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act0 (0.2)
Change in Accounting Method(24.4)

Change in Accounting Method0 (1.2)
Valuation AllowanceValuation Allowance1.6 1.5 
Other(15.0)(33.7)(7.1)Other0.8 0.2 0.3 
 
Provision for Income Taxes$401.4
$434.9
$484.6
Effective Tax RateEffective Tax Rate25.7 %23.2 %20.5 %


The currentIncome tax expense for the year includesended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $418.3 million and $451.9 million, representing an effective tax rate of 25.7% and 23.2%, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the increase in the effective tax rate was primarily driven by $26.8 million of tax expense related to the reversal of tax benefits primarily attributable topreviously recognized through earnings and higher taxes payable on the reductionincome of the Corporation’s non-U.S. branches.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the provision for income taxes included an increase in the U.S. corporatetaxes payable on the income of the Corporation’s non-U.S. branches. This increase included a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets as management believes the foreign tax credit carryforward generated in 2019 will not be fully realized.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, the provision for income taxes included income tax rate from 35% to 21% as a resultbenefits recorded in 2018 associated with the timing of tax deductions for software development-related expenses and the implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) enacted in the fourth quarter of 2017, a tax benefit recognized in 2018 resulting frompartially offset by a change in accounting method regarding the timing ofearnings mix in tax deductions for software-related expenses, and adjustments recordedjurisdictions in which the current year associated with the implementation of the TCJA as outlined below.
These decreases to the provision for income taxes in the current year were partially offset by the impact of an increase in income before income taxes, tax accounting changes in 2018 brought about by the TCJA including the tax accounting associated with additional non-deductible expenses, and a reduction in the income tax benefit derived from the vesting of restricted stock units and stock option exercises. Additionally, the 2017 provision for income taxes included a net benefit attributable to the implementation of the TCJA of $53.1 million and Federal and State research tax credits of $17.6 million related to the Corporation’s technology spend between 2013 and 2016, each resulting in a reduction of the effective tax rate.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 135

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The TCJA was enacted on December 22, 2017, and reduced the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. It also required companies to pay a mandatory deemed repatriation tax on earnings of foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred. At December 31, 2017, Northern Trust made a reasonable estimate as to the impact of the TCJA. During 2018, Northern Trust completed the related calculations and additional analyses associated with the implementation of the TCJA, resulting in a number of adjustments to the 2018 tax provision as follows:

TABLE 89: IMPACT OF TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT
(In Millions)2018
2017
Federal Taxes on Mandatory Deemed Repatriation$(16.8)$150.0
Impact Related to Federal Deferred Taxes12.7
(210.0)
Other Adjustments(0.7)6.9
   
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes$(4.8)$(53.1)

Adjustments in the above table include a tax benefit of $16.8 million resulting from an adjustment to the Corporation’s 2017 income tax provision for mandatory deemed repatriation with respect to the pre-2018 earnings of its non-US subsidiaries, offset by a $12.7 million net provision associated with the repricing of deferred taxes.Corporation operates.
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the TCJA introduces new provisions for U.S. taxation of certain global intangible low-taxed incomeGlobal Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI). Northern Trust has made the policy election to record any current year tax expense associated with GILTI in the period in which it is incurred.
The Corporation files income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state, and foreign jurisdictions. The Corporation is no longer subject to income tax examinations by U.S. federal authorities before 2013, U.S. state or local tax authorities for years before 2011, or non-U.S. tax authorities for years before 2010.2013.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 139

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Included in other liabilities withinOther Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 were $21.9$22.4 million and $27.7$25.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits, respectively. If recognized, 2018the amounts would reduce 2020 and 2017 net2019 income would have increasedtax expense by $19.8$20.7 million and $21.7$22.7 million, respectively, resulting in a decrease of those years’ effective income tax rates.respectively. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:follows.


TABLE 90:106: UNRECOGNIZED TAX BENEFITS
(In Millions)202020192018
Balance at January 1$25.3 $21.9 $27.7 
Additions for Tax Positions Taken in the Current Year0.9 0.9 0.5 
Additions for Tax Positions Taken in Prior Years0.4 4.0 1.7 
Reductions for Tax Positions Taken in Prior Years(4.2)(1.5)(7.8)
Reductions Resulting from Expiration of Statutes0 (0.2)
Balance at December 31$22.4 $25.3 $21.9 
(In Millions)2018
2017
Balance at January 1$27.7
$17.2
Additions for Tax Positions Taken in the Current Year0.5
9.9
Additions for Tax Positions Taken in Prior Years1.7
6.2
Reductions for Tax Positions Taken in Prior Years(7.8)(5.4)
Reductions Resulting from Expiration of Statutes(0.2)(0.2)
   
Balance at December 31$21.9
$27.7


Unrecognized tax benefits had net decreases of $5.8 million, resulting in a remaining balance of $21.9 million at December 31, 2018, compared to net increases of $10.5 million resulting in a remaining balance of $27.7 million at December 31, 2017. It is possible that changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could occur in the next 12 months due to changes in judgment related to recognition or measurement, settlements with taxing authorities, or expiration of statute of limitations. Management does not believe that future changes, if any, would have a material effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of Northern Trust, although they could have a material effect on operating results for a particular period.
A provision for interest and penalties of $0.3$1.2 million, net of tax, was included in the provisionProvision for income taxesIncome Taxes for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020. This compares to a provisionbenefit for interest and penalties of $0.1$1.3 million, net of tax, and a provision of $0.3 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the liability for the potential payment of interest and penalties totaled $9.2$9.6 million and $10.3$8.4 million, net of tax, respectively.

136   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The components of the consolidated provisionProvision for income taxesIncome Taxes for each of the three years ended December 31 are as follows:follows.


TABLE 91:107: PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
Current Tax Provision:
Federal$203.0 $216.4 $132.8 
State57.2 50.7 95.4 
Non-U.S.141.7 150.5 162.7 
Total$401.9 $417.6 $390.9 
Deferred Tax Provision:
Federal$8.8 $16.5 $33.8 
State5.4 16.5 (13.8)
Non-U.S.2.2 1.3 (9.5)
Total$16.4 $34.3 $10.5 
Provision for Income Taxes$418.3 $451.9 $401.4 
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Current Tax Provision:   
Federal$132.8
$347.3
$495.8
State95.4
38.3
65.3
Non-U.S.162.7
125.4
99.3
    
Total390.9
511.0
660.4
Deferred Tax Provision:   
Federal$33.8
$(96.4)$(159.0)
State(13.8)24.6
(18.9)
Non-U.S.(9.5)(4.3)2.1
    
Total10.5
(76.1)(175.8)
    
Provision for Income Taxes$401.4
$434.9
$484.6


In addition to the amounts shown above, tax charges and benefits have been recorded directly to stockholders’ equityStockholders’ Equity for the following:following.


TABLE 92:108: TAX CHARGES AND BENEFITS RECORDED DIRECTLY TO STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
Tax Effect of Other Comprehensive Income$168.1 $88.9 $25.7 
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Current Tax Benefit (Charge) for Employee Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Plans$
$
$(7.6)
Tax Effect of Other Comprehensive Income25.7
(112.4)72.4


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 137

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Deferred taxes result from temporary differences between the amounts reported inon the consolidated financial statements and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. As a result of the TCJA being enacted on December 22, 2017, deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 were measured at 21%, compared to 35% as of December 31, 2016, based on the federal tax rate at which they are expected to reverse in the future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities have been computed as follows:follows.







140 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TABLE 93:109: NET DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
                      DECEMBER 31,DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
(In Millions)20202019
Deferred Tax Liabilities: Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Lease Financing$43.3
$85.8
Lease Financing$9.0 $36.9 
Software Development193.2
187.8
Software Development268.1 249.4 
Accumulated Depreciation129.5
41.0
Accumulated Depreciation99.7 99.8 
Compensation and Benefits10.9

Compensation and Benefits31.0 8.3 
State Taxes, net58.9
59.4
State Taxes, net67.4 66.4 
Other Liabilities114.5
145.7
Other Liabilities372.6 206.7 
 
Gross Deferred Tax Liabilities550.3
519.7
Gross Deferred Tax Liabilities847.8 667.5 
 
Deferred Tax Assets: Deferred Tax Assets:
Allowance for Credit Losses29.0
32.3
Allowance for Credit Losses54.5 26.1 
Compensation and Benefits
35.5
Other Assets120.6
88.3
Other Assets139.8 147.0 
 
Gross Deferred Tax Assets149.6
156.1
Gross Deferred Tax Assets194.3 173.1 
 
Valuation Reserve(0.3)(1.1)Valuation Reserve(55.2)(29.8)
Deferred Tax Assets, net of Valuation Reserve149.3
155.0
Deferred Tax Assets, net of Valuation Reserve139.1 143.3 
 
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities$401.0
$364.7
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities$708.7 $524.2 


Northern Trust had various state net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019. The income tax benefits associated with these loss carryforwards were approximately $0.3$0.5 million as of December 31, 20182020 and $1.1$1.0 million as of December 31, 2017.2019. A valuation allowance related to the loss carryforwards of $0.5 million and $0.3 million was recorded at December 31, 20182020 and $1.1 million as of December 31, 2017,2019, respectively, as management believes the net operating losses will not be fully realized. No
The Corporation generated a foreign tax credit carryforward during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, expiring in 2030 and 2029, respectively. A valuation allowance related to the remaining deferred tax assetscredit carryforward of $25.3 million and $29.5 million was recorded at December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively, as management believes it is more likely thanthe foreign tax credit carryforwards will not that the deferred tax assets will be fully realized.
Note 2223 – Employee Benefits
The Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries provide various benefit programs, including defined benefit pension, postretirement health care, and defined contribution plans. A description of each major plan and related disclosures are provided below.


Pension. A noncontributory qualified defined benefit pension plan covers substantially all U.S. employees of Northern Trust. Employees of certain European subsidiaries retain benefits in local defined benefit plans, although those plans are closed to new participants and to future benefit accruals. Employees continue to accrue benefits under the Swiss pension plan, which is accounted for as a defined benefit plan under U.S. GAAP.
Northern Trust also maintains a noncontributory supplemental pension plan for participants whose retirement benefit paymentsbenefits under the U.S. planQualified Plan are expected to exceed the limits imposed by federal tax law. Northern Trust has a nonqualified trust, referred to as a “Rabbi” Trust, used to hold assets designated for the funding of benefits in excess of those permitted in certain of its qualified retirement plans. This arrangement offers participants a degree of assurance for payment of benefits in excess of those permitted in the related qualified plans. As the “Rabbi” Trust assets remain subject to the claims of creditors and are not the property of the employees, they are accounted for as corporate assets and are included in other assets inOther Assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Total assets in the “Rabbi” Trust related to the nonqualified pension plan at December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 amounted to $129.9$137.5 million and $116.7$128.8 million, respectively. Contributions of $21.9$10.6 million and $11.5$3.0 million were made to the “Rabbi” Trust in 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.

138   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables set forth the status, amounts included in AOCI, and net periodic pension expense of the U.S. plan, non-U.S. plans,Qualified Plan, Non-U.S. Pension Plans, and supplemental planU.S. Non-Qualified Plan for 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016.2018. Prior service costs are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 11 years for the U.S. planQualified Plan and 910 years for the supplemental plan.U.S. Non-Qualified Plan of which approximately one year was remaining as of December 31, 2020 for both the U.S. Qualified Plan and the U.S. Non-Qualified Plan.

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 141

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TABLE 94:110: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN STATUS
U.S. QUALIFIED PLANNON-U.S. PENSION PLANSU.S. NON-QUALIFIED PLAN
($ In Millions)202020192020201920202019
Accumulated Benefit Obligation$1,312.9 $1,181.9 $228.5 $204.7 $139.8 $131.5 
Projected Benefit Obligation$1,470.6 $1,323.4 $236.1 $211.1 $162.3 $149.2 
Plan Assets at Fair Value1,793.7 1,601.2 211.5 190.1 0 
Funded Status at December 31$323.1 $277.8 $(24.6)$(21.0)$(162.3)$(149.2)
Weighted-Average Assumptions:
Discount Rates2.75 %3.37 %0.93 %1.40 %2.45 %3.37 %
Rate of Increase in Compensation Level4.97 4.97 1.50 1.50 4.97 4.97 
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Assets5.25 5.25 1.28 1.72 N/AN/A
                  U.S. PLAN                 NON-U.S. PLANS           SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
Accumulated Benefit Obligation$980.6
$1,088.4
$178.4
$192.2
$120.9
$129.0
       
Projected Benefit Obligation1,092.0
1,209.9
183.5
198.3
135.6
144.5
Plan Assets at Fair Value1,380.1
1,506.4
166.7
178.7


       
Funded Status at December 31$288.1
$296.5
$(16.8)$(19.6)$(135.6)$(144.5)
Weighted-Average Assumptions:      
Discount Rates4.47%3.79%2.16%2.08%4.47%3.79%
Rate of Increase in Compensation Level4.39
4.39
1.75%1.75
4.39
4.39
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Assets6.00
6.00
2.39
2.61
N/A
N/A


TABLE 95:111: AMOUNTS INCLUDED IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
U.S. QUALIFIED PLANNON-U.S. PENSION PLANSU.S. NON-QUALIFIED PLAN
(In Millions)202020192020201920202019
Net Actuarial Loss$332.4 $426.7 $49.0 $46.5 $96.3 $82.5 
Prior Service (Benefit) Cost(0.6)(1.0)2.2 3.0 0.1 0.2 
Gross Amount in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income331.8 425.7 51.2 49.5 96.4 82.7 
Income Tax Effect82.1 105.7 6.4 6.2 23.9 20.4 
Net Amount in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income$249.7 $320.0 $44.8 $43.3 $72.5 $62.3 
                  U.S. PLAN                 NON-U.S. PLANS           SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN
(In Millions)2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
Net Actuarial Loss$435.4
$399.0
$41.2
$44.2
$65.8
$83.2
Prior Service Cost(1.4)(1.8)3.6
2.5
0.4
0.6
       
Gross Amount in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income434.0
397.2
44.8
46.7
66.2
83.8
Income Tax Effect108.5
151.6
6.0
5.3
16.4
31.9
       
Net Amount in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income$325.5
$245.6
$38.8
$41.4
$49.8
$51.9


TABLE 96:112: NET PERIODIC PENSION EXPENSE
U.S. QUALIFIED PLANNON-U.S. PENSION PLANSU.S. NON-QUALIFIED PLAN
($ In Millions)202020192018202020192018202020192018
Service Cost$47.4 $41.6 $41.4 $1.9 $2.0 $1.7 $4.6 $4.1 $4.3 
Interest Cost43.3 47.2 44.3 2.9 3.9 4.0 4.8 5.8 5.3 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(76.8)(86.9)(88.2)(3.1)(4.4)(4.4) — N/A
Settlement Expense0 0.8 0.5 0 
Amortization:
Net Actuarial Loss35.0 17.2 28.2 0.8 0.6 0.9 7.0 5.6 7.4 
Prior Service (Benefit) Cost(0.4)(0.4)(0.4)0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 
Net Periodic Pension Expense$48.5 $18.7 $25.3 $3.7 $2.4 $2.9 $16.6 $15.7 $17.2 
Weighted-Average Assumptions:
Discount Rates3.37 %4.47 %3.79 %1.40 %2.16 %2.08 %3.37 %4.47 %3.79 %
Rate of Increase in Compensation Level4.97 4.39 4.39 1.50 1.75 1.75 4.97 4.39 4.39 
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Assets5.25 6.00 6.00 1.72 2.39 2.61 N/AN/AN/A
          U.S. PLAN          NON-U.S. PLANS         SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN
($ In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
Service Cost$41.4
$38.3
$37.4
$1.7
$0.4
$
$4.3
$3.7
$3.5
Interest Cost44.3
45.9
45.8
4.0
4.0
4.7
5.3
5.2
5.1
Expected Return on Plan Assets(88.2)(93.8)(94.4)(4.4)(4.5)(4.6)N/A
N/A
N/A
Settlement Expense


0.5
1.1
3.7



Amortization:         
Net Loss28.2
19.0
18.8
0.9
1.3
1.0
7.4
5.7
5.8
Prior Service Cost(0.4)(0.4)(0.4)0.2
0.1

0.2
0.2
0.2
Net Periodic Pension Expense$25.3
$9.0
$7.2
$2.9
$2.4
$4.8
$17.2
$14.8
$14.6
Weighted-Average Assumptions:         
Discount Rates3.79%4.46%4.71%2.08%2.33%3.39%3.79%4.46%4.71%
Rate of Increase in Compensation Level4.39
4.39
4.25
1.75
1.75
N/A
4.39
4.39
4.25
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Assets6.00
6.75
7.00
2.61
3.13
3.73
N/A
N/A
N/A


The components of net periodic pension expense are included in the line item “Employee Benefits”Employee Benefits expense inon the consolidated statements of income.






2018142 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation139

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE 97:113: CHANGE IN PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION
                      U.S. PLAN                      NON-U.S. PLANS                      SUPPLEMENTAL PLANU.S. QUALIFIED PLANNON-U.S. PENSION PLANSU.S. NON-QUALIFIED PLAN
(In Millions)2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
(In Millions)202020192020201920202019
Beginning Balance$1,209.9
$1,062.7
$198.3
$155.9
$144.5
$121.1
Beginning Balance$1,323.4 $1,092.0 $211.1 $183.5 $149.2 $135.6 
Service Cost41.4
38.3
1.7
0.4
4.3
3.7
Service Cost47.4 41.6 1.9 2.0 4.6 4.1 
Interest Cost44.3
45.9
4.0
4.0
5.3
5.2
Interest Cost43.3 47.2 2.9 3.9 4.8 5.8 
Employee Contributions

0.4
0.1


Employee Contributions0 0.6 0.6 0 
Plan Amendment

1.3
2.5


Plan Amendment0 (0.5)(0.4)0 
Actuarial (Gain) Loss(112.4)142.6
(9.3)0.4
(9.7)21.5
Actuarial Loss (Gain)Actuarial Loss (Gain)136.5 213.3 19.1 20.9 20.4 22.0 
Settlement

(2.7)(6.8)

Settlement0 (5.4)0 
Acquisitions/Divestitures


27.0


Benefits Paid(91.2)(79.6)(1.1)(3.0)(8.8)(7.0)Benefits Paid(80.0)(70.7)(4.1)(3.6)(16.7)(18.3)
Foreign Exchange Rate Changes

(9.1)17.8


Foreign Exchange Rate Changes0 10.5 4.2 0 
 
Ending Balance$1,092.0
$1,209.9
$183.5
$198.3
$135.6
$144.5
Ending Balance$1,470.6 $1,323.4 $236.1 $211.1 $162.3 $149.2 


Actuarial gainslosses of $131.4$176.0 million and $256.2 million in 20182020 and 2019, respectively, were primarily caused by increases in discount rates, while actuarial losses of $164.5 million in 2017 were mostly a result of decreases in discount rates and an update to the U.S. IRS lump sum mortality assumption to reflect longer life expectancies.rates.


TABLE 98:114: ESTIMATED FUTURE BENEFIT PAYMENTS
(In Millions)U.S.
PLAN

NON-U.S.
PLANS

SUPPLEMENTAL
PLAN

(In Millions)U.S. QUALIFIED PLANNON-U.S.PENSION PLANSU.S. NON-QUALIFIED PLAN
2019$74.0
$3.4
$12.0
202076.8
3.8
11.5
202175.1
4.1
14.4
2021$86.8 $4.4 $18.0 
202273.4
3.9
16.2
202288.9 4.3 20.0 
202377.1
4.3
14.9
202396.3 4.8 18.2 
2024-2028368.9
26.4
63.6
2024202496.4 5.0 11.6 
2025202598.6 5.0 12.7 
2026-20302026-2030495.5 32.4 62.0 


TABLE 99:115: CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS
U.S. QUALIFIED PLANNON-U.S PENSION PLANS
(In Millions)2020201920202019
Fair Value of Assets at Beginning of Period$1,601.2 $1,380.1 $190.1 $166.7 
Actual Return on Assets272.5 291.8 17.9 18.6 
Employer Contributions0 5.0 3.1 
Employee Contributions0 0.6 0.6 
Settlement0 (5.4)
Benefits Paid(80.0)(70.7)(4.1)(3.6)
Foreign Exchange Rate Changes0 7.4 4.7 
Fair Value of Assets at End of Period$1,793.7 $1,601.2 $211.5 $190.1 
                       U.S. PLAN                      NON-U.S. PLANS
(In Millions)2018
2017
2018
2017
Fair Value of Assets at Beginning of Period$1,506.4
$1,393.5
$178.7
$139.3
Actual Return on Assets(85.1)192.5
(2.3)12.4
Employer Contributions50.0

2.6
3.0
Employee Contributions

0.4
0.1
Settlement

(2.7)(6.8)
Acquisitions/Divestitures


18.5
Benefits Paid(91.2)(79.6)(1.1)(3.0)
Foreign Exchange Rate Changes

(8.9)15.2
     
Fair Value of Assets at End of Period$1,380.1
$1,506.4
$166.7
$178.7


The minimum required and maximum remaining deductible contributions for the U.S. qualified planQualified Plan in 20192021 are estimated to be zero0 and $270.0$255.0 million, respectively.
During 2017, the investment strategy employed for Northern Trust'sTrust’s U.S. pension planQualified Plan was changed to utilize a dynamic glide path based on a set of pre-approved asset allocations to return-seeking and liability-hedging assets that vary in accordance with the plan'sU.S. Qualified Plan’s projected benefit obligation funded ratio. In 2020, the glide path was adjusted to allow for a greater component of return-seeking investments.
In general, as the plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan’s projected benefit obligation funded ratio increases beyond an established threshold, the plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan’s allocation to liability-hedging assets will increase while the allocation to return-seeking assets will decrease. Conversely, a decrease in the plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan’s projected benefit obligation funded ratio beyond an established threshold will result in a decrease in the plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan’s allocation to liability-hedging assets and increase in the allocation to return-seeking assets. Liability-hedging assets include U.S. long credit bonds, U.S. long government bonds, and a custom completion strategy used to hedge more closely the liability duration of projected plan

140   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

benefits with bond duration across all durations. Return-seeking assets include: U.S. equity, international developed equity, emerging markets equity, real estate, high yield bonds, global listed infrastructure, emerging market debt, private equity and hedge funds.
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 143

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Northern Trust utilizes an asset/liability methodology to determine the investment policies that will best meet its short and long-term objectives. The process is performed by modeling current and alternative strategies for asset allocation, funding policy and actuarial methods and assumptions. The financial modeling uses projections of expected capital market returns and expected volatility of those returns to determine alternative asset mixes having the greatest probability of meeting the plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan’s investment objectives. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of planthe U.S. Qualified Plan liabilities, plan funded status, and corporate financial condition. The intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by outperformingprotect the U.S. Qualified Plan’s healthy funded status and generate returns, which in combination with minimal voluntary contributions are expected to outpace the U.S. Qualified Plan’s liability growth in plan liabilities over the long run.
The target allocation of planthe U.S. Qualified Plan assets since May 2017 ishad been adjusted in August 2020 and consists of 45% U.S. long credit bonds, 10% U.S. long government bonds,20% global equities (developed and emerging markets), 10% custom completion, 8% U.S. equities, 5% international developed equity, 3% emerging markets equity, 3% real estate, 4% high yield bonds, 3%5% private equity, 4% emerging market debt, 4% global listed infrastructure, 4% emerging market debt, 2% private equity,real estate, and 3% hedge funds.
EquityGlobal equity investments include common stocks that are listed on an exchange and investments in commingled funds that invest primarily in publicly traded equities. Equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks and divided by investment style and market capitalization. Fixed income securities held include U.S. treasury securities, corporate bonds, and investments in commingled funds that invest in a diversified blend of longer duration fixed income securities; the custom completion strategy uses U.S. treasury securities and interest rate futures (or similar instruments) to align more closely with the target hedge ratio across maturities. Diversifying investments, including private equity, hedge funds, listedprivate real estate, emerging market debt, high yield bonds, and global listed infrastructure, are used judiciously to enhance long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification. Private equity assets consist primarily of investments in limited partnerships that invest in individual companies in the form of non-public equity or non-public debt positions. Direct or co-investment in non-public stock by the planU.S. Qualified Plan is prohibited. The plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan’s private equity investments are limited to 2%20% of each of the total limited partnership or fund of funds and the maximum allowable loss cannot exceed the commitment amount. The plan holds two investmentsU.S. Qualified Plan invests in 1 hedge fundsfund of funds, which invest,invests, either directly or indirectly, in diversified portfolios of funds or other pooled investment vehicles.
InvestmentInvestments in listedprivate real estate, high yield bonds, emerging market debt, and global listed infrastructure are designed to provide income and added diversification.
Though not a primary strategy for meeting the plan’s objectives, derivativesDerivatives may be used, from time to time, depending on the nature of the asset class to which they relate, to gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner, to hedge foreign currency exposure or interest rate risk, or to alter the duration of a portfolio. There were four5 derivatives held by the planU.S. Qualified Plan at December 31, 2018. There were four derivatives held by the plan at December 31, 2017.2020 and 2019.
Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through monthly liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies, and quarterly investment portfolio reviews. Standards used to evaluate the plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan’s investment manager performance include, but are not limited to, the achievement of objectives, operation within guidelines and policy, and comparison against a relative benchmark. In addition, each manager of the investment funds held by the planU.S. Qualified Plan is ranked against a universe of peers and compared to a relative benchmark. Total planU.S. Qualified Plan performance analysis includes an analysis of the market environment, asset allocation impact on performance, risk and return relative to other ERISA plans, and manager impacts upon planU.S. Qualified Plan performance.
The following describes the hierarchy of inputs used to measure fair value and the primary valuation methodologies used by Northern Trust for the U.S. qualified planQualified Plan assets measured at fair value.
Level 1 – Quoted, active market prices for identical assets or liabilities. The U.S. Qualified Plan’s Level 1 investmentsassets are comprised of a mutual fund and domestic common stocks. The U.S. Qualified Plan’s Level 1 investments that are exchange traded are valued at the closing price reported by the respective exchanges on the day of valuation.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted active market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in inactive markets, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets. The U.S. Qualified Plan’s Level 2 assets are comprised of U.S. government obligations and collective trust funds. The investments in collective trust funds fair values are calculated on a scheduled basis using the closing market prices and accruals of securities in the funds (total value of the funds) divided by the number of fund shares currently issued and outstanding. Redemptions of the collective trust funds occur by contract at the respective fund’s redemption date NAV.net asset value (NAV).
Level 3 – Valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable in the marketplace. The Plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan did not hold Level 3 assets are comprisedas of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Assets valued at fair value using NAV per share - The U.S. Qualified Plan’s assets valued at fair value using NAV per share include investments in private equity funds and a hedge fundsfund, which invest in underlying groups of investment funds or other pooled investment vehicles that are selected by the respective funds’ investment managers. The investment funds and the underlying investments held by these investment funds are valued at fair value. In determining the fair value of the underlying investments of each fund, the fund’s investment manager or general partner takes into account the

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 141

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

estimated value reported by the underlying funds as well as any other considerations that may, in their judgment, increase or decrease such estimated value. The investments in the private equity funds and a hedge fund are considered to be long-



144 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
term investments. There are no capital withdrawal options related to the investments in the private equity funds. However, capital is occasionally distributed as underlying investments are sold. It is estimated that the current private equity investments would be liquidated over 1 year to 8 years. The Plan’s investment in the hedge fund can be withdrawn quarterly, after a sixty days notice period.
The U.S. Qualified Plan’s assets valued at fair value using NAV per share also include investments in real estate funds, which invest in real estate assets. The investment in properties by the real estate funds are carried at fair value, which is estimated based on the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between marketplace participants at the measurement date. The valuation plan for each real estate investment is subject to review on an annual basis which is based on either an external appraisal from appraisal firms or internal valuations prepared by the real estate fund’s investment advisor. The Plan’s investment in real estate funds are considered to be long-term investments and can be withdrawn quarterly to the extent the real estate funds have liquid assets, after a forty-five days notice period.
As investments in the private equity funds, hedge fund, and real estate fundare valued at fair value using NAV per share, they are not required to be categorized within the fair value hierarchy.
While Northern Trust believes its valuation methods for planU.S. Qualified Plan assets are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions particularly as applied to Level 3 assets, could have a material effect on the computation of the estimated fair values.

The following table presents the fair values of Northern Trust’s U.S. pension planQualified Plan assets, by major asset category, and their level within the fair value hierarchy defined by GAAP as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


TABLE 100:116: FAIR VALUE OF U.S. PENSIONQUALIFIED PLAN ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 2020
(In Millions)LEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3TOTAL
Domestic Common Stock$13.5 $0 $0 $13.5 
Domestic Corporate Bonds0 314.4 0 314.4 
Foreign Corporate Bonds0 43.6 0 43.6 
U.S. Government Obligations2.9 113.1 0 116.0 
Non-U.S. Government Obligations0 22.9 0 22.9 
Domestic Municipal and Provincial Bonds0 22.4 0 22.4 
Foreign Municipal and Provincial Bonds0 0.3 0 0.3 
Collective Trust Funds0 985.5 0 985.5 
Mutual Funds167.0 0 0 167.0 
Cash and Other7.5 0 0 7.5 
Total Assets at Fair Value in the Fair Value Hierarchy$190.9 $1,502.2 $0 $1,693.1 
Assets Valued at NAV per share
Northern Trust Private Equity Funds20.3 
Northern Trust Hedge Fund34.2 
Real Estate Funds46.1 
Total Assets at Fair Value$1,793.7 
 December 31, 2018
(In Millions)LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
TOTAL
Domestic Common Stock$36.3
$
$
$36.3
Foreign Common Stock



U.S. Government Obligations
1,010.2

1,010.2
Northern Trust Mutual Fund39.9


39.9
Exchange Traded Fund0.1


0.1
Northern Trust Collective Trust Funds
226.5

226.5
Northern Trust Private Equity Funds

25.5
25.5
Northern Trust Hedge Funds

29.2
29.2
Cash and Other12.4


12.4
     
Total Assets at Fair Value$88.7
$1,236.7
$54.7
$1,380.1

 December 31, 2017
(In Millions)LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
TOTAL
Domestic Common Stock$38.6
$
$
$38.6
Foreign Common Stock



U.S. Government Obligations
1,072.0

1,072.0
Northern Trust Mutual Fund44.5


44.5
Exchange Traded Fund0.1


0.1
Northern Trust Collective Trust Funds
268.6

268.6
Northern Trust Private Equity Funds

29.3
29.3
Northern Trust Hedge Funds

44.6
44.6
Cash and Other8.7


8.7
     
Total Assets at Fair Value$91.9
$1,340.6
$73.9
$1,506.4

The following table presents the changes in Level 3 assets for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

TABLE 101: CHANGE IN LEVEL 3 ASSETS
 
                      PRIVATE EQUITY
                      FUNDS
                       HEDGE FUNDS
(In Millions)2018
2017
2018
2017
Fair Value at January 1$29.3
$35.7
$44.6
$64.8
Actual Return on Plan Assets(1.5)(5.4)(2.7)(3.1)
Realized Gain

2.4
5.0
Purchases0.3
0.8


Sales(2.6)(1.8)(15.1)(22.1)
     
Fair Value at December 31$25.5
$29.3
$29.2
$44.6

Note: The return on plan assets represents the change in the unrealized gain (loss) on assets still held at December 31.


142   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation145


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2019
(In Millions)LEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3TOTAL
Domestic Common Stock$12.3 $$$12.3 
Domestic Corporate Bonds254.6 254.6 
Foreign Corporate Bonds45.0 45.0 
U.S. Government Obligations168.3 168.3 
Non-U.S. Government Obligations18.8 18.8 
Domestic Municipal and Provincial Bonds23.1 23.1 
Foreign Municipal and Provincial Bonds0.3 0.3 
Collective Trust Funds866.6 866.6 
Mutual Funds112.8 112.8 
Cash and Other2.6 2.6 
Total Assets at Fair Value in the Fair Value Hierarchy$127.7 $1,376.7 $$1,504.4 
Assets Valued at NAV per share
Northern Trust Private Equity Funds20.3 
Northern Trust Hedge Fund30.2 
Real Estate Funds46.3 
Total Assets at Fair Value$1,601.2 
A
0A building block approach is employed for Northern Trust’s U.S. pension planQualified Plan in determining the long-term rate of return for plan assets. Historical markets and long-term historical relationships between equities, fixed income and other asset classes are studied using the widely accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long-run. Current market factors such as inflation expectations and interest rates are evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. The long-term portfolio rate of return is established with consideration given to diversification and rebalancing. The rate is reviewed against peer data and historical returns to verify the return is reasonable and appropriate. Based on this approach and the plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan’s target asset allocation, the expected long-term rate of return on assets as of the plan’sU.S. Qualified Plan’s December 31, 2018,2020 measurement date was set at 6.00%5.25%.


Postretirement Health Care. Northern Trust maintains an unfunded postretirement health care plan under which those employees who retire at age 55 or older under the provisions of the U.S. defined benefit plan and had attained 15 years of service as of December 31, 2011 may be eligible for subsidized postretirement health care coverage. The provisions of this health care plan may be changed further at the discretion of Northern Trust, which also reserves the right to terminate these benefits at any time.
Northern Trust changed the plan design of its post-retirement health care plan as of January 1, 2021, which resulted in the recognition of negative prior-service cost of $12.7 million at the time these changes were communicated to participants in August 2020. Concurrently, a further shift in population from active to inactive participants required an adjustment to the amortization period from the average remaining service period of active participants to the average life expectancy of the inactive participants. The change in plan design and amortization period resulted in a decrease of the benefit obligation and 2020 benefit expense at the time of recognition by $12.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Negative prior service costs are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 13.9 years.
The following tables set forth the postretirement health care plan status and amounts included in AOCI at December 31, 2020 and 2019, the net periodic postretirement benefit cost of the plan for 20182020 and 2017,2019, and the change in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation during 20182020 and 2017.2019.


TABLE 102:117: POSTRETIREMENT HEALTH CARE PLAN STATUS
DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation at Measurement Date:
Retirees and Dependents$13.2 $25.2 
Actives Eligible for Benefits2.5 3.6 
Net Postretirement Benefit Obligation$15.7 $28.8 




146 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation at Measurement Date:  
Retirees and Dependents$23.5
$27.7
Actives Eligible for Benefits4.6
6.7
   
Net Postretirement Benefit Obligation$28.1
$34.4

TABLE 103:118: AMOUNTS INCLUDED IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
Net Actuarial (Gain) Loss$(4.9)$(5.4)
Prior Service Cost(12.4)
Gross Amount in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(17.3)(5.4)
Income Tax Effect(4.3)(1.4)
Net Amount in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income$(13.0)$(4.0)
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
Net Actuarial Loss / (Gain)$(6.5)$3.9
Prior Service Cost

   
Gross Amount in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(6.5)3.9
Income Tax Effect(2.2)1.5
   
Net Amount in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income$(4.3)$2.4


TABLE 104:119: NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT EXPENSE (BENEFIT) EXPENSE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
Service Cost$0 $$
Interest Cost0.7 1.2 1.3 
Expected Return on Plan Assets0 
Amortization
Net Gain(0.6)(1.1)
Prior Service Benefit(0.3)
Net Periodic Postretirement Expense$(0.2)$0.1 $1.3 
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Service Cost$
$0.1
$0.1
Interest Cost1.3
1.4
1.5
Expected Return on Plan Assets


Amortization   
Net Gain


Prior Service Benefit


    
Net Periodic Postretirement Expense$1.3
$1.5
$1.6



2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 143

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE 105:120: CHANGE IN ACCUMULATED POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT OBLIGATION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
Beginning Balance$28.8 $28.1 
Service Cost0 
Interest Cost0.7 1.2 
Plan Amendment(12.7)
Actuarial Loss (Gain)(0.1)0.2 
Net Claims Paid(1.0)(0.7)
Ending Balance$15.7 $28.8 
 
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                      DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
Beginning Balance$34.4
$34.1
Service Cost
0.1
Interest Cost1.3
1.4
Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(6.7)(0.2)
Net Claims Paid(6.3)(1.0)
Medicare Subsidy5.4

   
Ending Balance$28.1
$34.4


Northern Trust uses the aggregate RP-2014Pri-2012 mortality table with adjustment from 2014 to 2006. Northern Trust’s pension obligations reflecta 2012 base year and proposed future improvementimprovements under scale MP-2018,MP-2020, as released by the Society of Actuaries in October 2018. This2020. The assumption for future mortality improvements was updated at December 31, 20182020 from the prior year’s improvement scale MP-2017.MP-2019.

TABLE 106:121: ESTIMATED FUTURE BENEFIT PAYMENTS
(In Millions)TOTAL
POSTRETIREMENT
MEDICAL
BENEFITS
2021$1.7 
20221.5 
20231.4 
20241.3 
20251.2 
2026-20305.1 
(In Millions)TOTAL
POSTRETIREMENT
MEDICAL
BENEFITS

2019$2.5
20202.5
20212.4
20222.3
20232.2
2024-202810.1


The weighted average discount rate used in determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 4.47%2.16% at December 31, 2018,2020, and 3.79%3.37% at December 31, 2017.2019. For measurement purposes, a 6.5%5.75% annual increase in the cost of pre-age 65 medical benefits and post-age 65 medical benefits were assumed for 2018.2020. For drug claims, an 8.50%a 7.50% annual increase in cost was assumed for 2018.2020. These rates are both assumed to gradually decrease until they reach 4.5%4.50% in 2026 and 2027, respectively.2027. The health care cost trend rate assumption has an effect on the amounts reported.


Defined Contribution Plans. The Corporation and its subsidiaries maintain various defined contribution plans covering substantially all employees. The Corporation’s contribution to the U.S. plan and to certain European-based plans includes a
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 147

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
matching component. The expense associated with defined contribution plans is charged to employee benefitsEmployee Benefits and totaled $62.9 million in 2020, $57.6 million in 2019, and $54.4 million in 2018, $53.4 million in 2017, and $50.0 million in 2016.2018.
Note 2324 – Share-Based Compensation Plans
Northern Trust recognizes expense for the grant-date fair value of share-based compensation granted to employees and non-employee directors.
Total compensation expense for share-based payment arrangements to employees and the associated tax impacts were as follows for the periods presented.


TABLE 107:122: TOTAL COMPENSATION EXPENSE FOR SHARE-BASED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS TO EMPLOYEES
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Restricted Stock Unit Awards$96.3
$87.3
$60.2
Stock Options2.6
9.0
9.0
Performance Stock Units32.0
31.7
17.6
    
Total Share-Based Compensation Expense$130.9
$128.0
$86.8
Tax Benefits Recognized$32.5
$48.7
$32.8

144   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
Restricted Stock Unit Awards$78.1 $81.4 $96.3 
Stock Options0.5 1.4 2.6 
Performance Stock Units12.8 25.1 32.0 
Total Share-Based Compensation Expense$91.4 $107.9 $130.9 
Tax Benefits Recognized$22.9 $26.7 $32.5 
As of December 31, 2018,2020, there was $84.5$70.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Corporation’s share-based compensation plans. That cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of approximately two years.
The Northern Trust Corporation 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2017 Plan) is administered by the Compensation and Benefits Committee (Committee) of the Board of Directors. All employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries and all directors of the Corporation are eligible to receive awards under the 2017 Plan. The 2017 Plan provides for the grant of nonqualifiednon-qualified and incentive stock options; tandem and free-standing stock appreciation rights; stock awards in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock awards; and performance awards.
Beginning with grants made on February 21, 2017 under the Northern Trust Corporation 2012 Stock Plan (2012 Plan), restricted stock unit and performance stock unit grants continue to vest in accordance with the original terms of the award if the applicable employee retires after satisfying applicable age and service requirements. For all applicable periods, stock option grants continue to vest in accordance with the original terms of the award if the employee meets applicable age and service requirements upon separation from service.
Grants are outstanding under the 2017 Plan, the 2012 Plan, and the Amended and Restated Northern Trust Corporation 2002 Stock Plan (2002 Plan). The 2017 Plan was approved by stockholders in April 2017. Upon approval of the 2017 Plan, no additional shares have been or will be granted under the 2012 Plan or 2002 Plan. The total number of shares of the Corporation’s common stock authorized for issuance under the 2017 Plan is 20,000,000 plus shares forfeited under the 2012 Plan and 2002 Plan. As of December 31, 2018,2020, shares available for future grant under the 2017 Plan, including shares forfeited under the 2012 Plan and 2002 Plan, totaled 19,314,935.17,168,019.
The following describes Northern Trust’s share-based payment arrangements and applies to awards under the 2017 Plan, 2012 Plan and the 2002 Plan, as applicable.


Stock Options. Stock options consist of options to purchase common stock at prices not less than 100% of the fair value thereof on the date the options are granted. Options have a maximum 10 yearyears life and generally vest and become exercisable in 1 year to 4 years after the date of grant. All options terminate at such time as determined by the Committee and as provided in the terms and conditions of the respective option grants.
There were no options granted during the year ended December 31, 2018. The weighted-average assumptions used for0 options granted during the years ended December 31, 20172020, 2019, and 2016 are as follows:2018.

TABLE 108: WEIGHTED-AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS USED FOR OPTIONS GRANTED



148 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

 2017
2016
Expected Term (in Years)6.9
7.0
Dividend Yield1.81%2.57%
Expected Volatility23.2
32.3
Risk-Free Interest Rate2.11
1.45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The expected term of options represents the period of time options granted are expected to be outstanding based primarily on the historical exercise behavior attributable to previous option grants. Dividend yield represents the estimated yield from dividends paid on the Corporation’s common stock over the expected term of the options. Expected volatility is determined based on a combination of the historical volatility of Northern Trust’s stock price and the implied volatility of traded options on Northern Trust stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant for a period equal to the expected term of the options granted.
The following table provides information about stock options granted, vested, and exercised in the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016.2018.



2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 145

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE 109:123: STOCK OPTIONS GRANTED, VESTED, AND EXERCISED
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions, Except Per Share Information)202020192018
Grant-Date Fair Value of Stock Options Vested$4.5 $6.6 $8.1 
Stock Options Exercised
Intrinsic Value as of Exercise Date13.6 35.4 28.5 
Cash Received19.5 44.0 32.6 
Tax Deduction Benefits Realized13.4 35.2 27.7 

                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions, Except Per Share Information)2018
2017
2016
Weighted Average Grant-Date Per Share Fair Value of Stock Options Granted$
$19.18
$14.84
Grant-Date Fair Value of Stock Options Vested8.1
7.3
9.6
Stock Options Exercised   
Intrinsic Value as of Exercise Date28.5
74.7
83.9
Cash Received32.6
108.0
233.8
Tax Deduction Benefits Realized27.7
73.1
80.0


The following is a summary of changes in nonvested stock options for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020.


TABLE 110:124: CHANGES IN NONVESTED STOCK OPTIONS
NONVESTED OPTIONSSHARESWEIGHTED- AVERAGE GRANT-DATE
FAIR VALUE
PER SHARE
Nonvested at December 31, 2019384,939 $17.45 
Granted0 0 
Vested(270,110)16.71 
Forfeited or Cancelled0 0 
Nonvested at December 31, 2020114,829 $19.18 
NONVESTED OPTIONSSHARES
WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE
GRANT-
DATE FAIR
VALUE
PER SHARE

Nonvested at December 31, 20171,246,505
$17.25
Granted

Vested(483,605)17.07
Forfeited or Cancelled(5,162)19.18
   
Nonvested at December 31, 2018757,738
$17.36


A summary of the status of stock options at December 31, 2018,2020, and changes during the year then ended, are presented in the table below.following table.


TABLE 111:125: STATUS OF STOCK OPTIONS AND CHANGES
($ In Millions Except Per Share Information)SHARESWEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE PER SHAREWEIGHTED AVERAGE REMAINING CONTRACTUAL TERM (YEARS)AGGREGATE INTRINSIC VALUE
Options Outstanding, December 31, 20191,696,936 $64.77 
Granted0 0 
Exercised(344,686)56.65 
Forfeited, Expired or Cancelled(2,325)49.54 
Options Outstanding, December 31, 20201,349,925 $66.87 3.3$35.5 
Options Exercisable, December 31, 20201,235,096 $64.90 3.2$34.9 
($ In Millions Except Per Share Information)SHARES
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE
PRICE
PER SHARE

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
REMAINING
CONTRACTUAL
TERM (YEARS)
AGGREGATE
INTRINSIC
VALUE

Options Outstanding, December 31, 20173,073,098
$60.99
  
Granted

  
Exercised(575,662)56.55
  
Forfeited, Expired or Cancelled(16,375)79.78
  
     
Options Outstanding, December 31, 20182,481,061
$61.90
5.1$55.8
     
Options Exercisable, December 31, 20181,723,323
$56.82
4.2$46.6


Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Restricted stock unit awards may be granted to participants which entitle them to receive a payment in the Corporation’s common stock or cash and such other terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate. Each restricted stock unit provides the recipient the opportunity to receive one1 share of stock for each stock unit that vests. The restricted stock units granted in 20182020 predominately vest at a rate equal to 25% each year for four years on the anniversary of the grant.first day of the month following the month in which the grant date falls. Restricted stock unit grants totaled 815,314, 863,308,772,848, 855,112, and 1,301,693,815,314, with weighted average grant-date fair values of $103.74, $88.19,$99.58, $91.89, and $59.17$103.74 per share, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock units vested during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, 2017,was $100.2 million, $89.3 million, and 2016, was $66.4 million, $88.7 million, and $52.3 million, respectively.
A summary of the status of outstanding restricted stock unit awards at December 31, 2018,2020, and changes during the year then ended, is presented in the table below.following table.



146   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation149


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE 112:126: OUTSTANDING RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS
($ In Millions)NUMBERAGGREGATE INTRINSIC VALUE
Restricted Stock Unit Awards Outstanding, December 31, 20192,644,762 $281.0 
Granted772,848 
Distributed(1,245,412)
Forfeited(26,547)
Restricted Stock Unit Awards Outstanding, December 31, 20202,145,651 $199.8 
Units Convertible, December 31, 202019,770 $1.8 
($ In Millions)NUMBER
AGGREGATE
INTRINSIC
VALUE

Restricted Stock Unit Awards Outstanding, December 31, 20173,399,438
$339.6
Granted815,314
 
Distributed(1,016,846) 
Forfeited(76,064) 
   
Restricted Stock Unit Awards Outstanding, December 31, 20183,121,842
$261.0
   
Units Convertible, December 31, 2018144,722
$12.1


The following is a summary of nonvested restricted stock unit awards at December 31, 2018,2020, and changes during the year then ended.


TABLE 113:127: NONVESTED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS
NONVESTED RESTRICTED
STOCK UNITS
NUMBERWEIGHTED AVERAGE GRANT- DATE FAIR VALUE PER UNITWEIGHTED AVERAGE REMAINING VESTING TERM (YEARS)
Nonvested at December 31, 20192,624,210 $87.26 1.7
Granted772,848 99.58 
Vested(1,244,630)80.46 
Forfeited(26,547)95.41 
Nonvested at December 31, 20202,125,881 $95.61 2.1
NONVESTED RESTRICTED
STOCK UNITS
NUMBER
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
GRANT-
DATE FAIR
VALUE
PER UNIT

WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
REMAINING
VESTING
TERM
(YEARS)
Nonvested at December 31, 20173,231,327
$69.67
1.9
Granted815,314
103.74
 
Vested(993,457)66.82
 
Forfeited(76,064)73.18
 
    
Nonvested at December 31, 20182,977,120
$79.92
1.9


Performance Stock Units. Each performance stock unit provides the recipient the opportunity to receive one1 share of the Corporation’s common stock for each stock unit that vests overat the end of a three-year performance period,period. For performance stock unit awards granted in 2018 and 2019, the number of units that vest are subject to satisfactionthe attainment of specified performance targets that are a function of internal return on equity goals. For performance stock unit awards granted in 2020, the number of units that vest are subject to the attainment of specified performance targets that are a function of internal return on equity goals and continued employment until the endrelative return on equity performance compared to a performance peer group of the vesting period.companies. For performance stock units outstanding as of December 31, 2018,2020, and granted in 2016, the number of such units that may vest ranges from 0% to 125% of the original award granted based on the attainment of the applicable three-year average annual return on equity target. For performance stock units outstanding at December 31, 2018 and granted in 2017 or 2018,2019, the number of such units that may vest ranges from 0% to 150% of the original award granted based on the attainment of the applicable three-year3-year average annual return on equity target. Distribution of the shares is then made after vesting.
Performance stock unit grants totaled 242,232, 231,269,205,847, 213,044, and 354,606242,232 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively, with weighted average grant-date fair values of $104.72, $69.80,$100.83, $93.00, and $62.67.$104.72. Performance stock units outstanding at target level performance totaled 797,531, 817,432,660,510, 667,741, and 859,502797,531 at December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. Performance stock units had aggregate intrinsic values of $66.7$61.5 million, $81.7$70.9 million, and $76.5$66.7 million, and weighted average remaining vesting terms of 1.0 year 1.1 years, and 1.5 years,each at December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively.


Non-employee Director Stock Awards. Stock units with total values of $1.5 million (20,148 units), $1.3 million (14,232 units), and $1.2 million (11,363 units), $1.2 million (13,354 units), and $1.3 million (18,001 units) were granted to non-employee directors in 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively, which vest or vested on the date of the annual meeting of the Corporation’s stockholders in the following years. Total expense recognized on these grants was $1.3$1.6 million, $1.3$1.4 million, and $1.3 million in 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, respectively. Stock units granted to non-employee directors do not have voting rights. Each stock unit entitles a director to one1 share of common stock at vesting, unless a director elects to defer receipt of the shares. Directors may elect to defer the payment of their annual stock unit grant and cash-based compensation until termination of services as director. Deferred cash compensation is converted into stock units representing shares of common stock of the Corporation. Distributions of deferred stock units are made in stock. For compensation deferred prior to January 1, 2018, distributions of the stock unit accounts that relate to cash-based compensation are made in cash based on the fair value of the stock units at the time of distribution. For compensation deferred on or after January 1, 2018, distributions of the stock unit accounts that relate to cash-based compensation are made in stock.




2018150 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation147

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 2425 – Cash-Based Compensation Plans
Various incentive plans provide for cash incentives and bonuses to selected employees based upon accomplishment of corporate net income objectives, goals of the reporting segments and support functions, and individual performance. The provision for awards under these plans is charged to compensationCompensation expense and totaled $296.2 million in 2020, $326.1 million in 2019, and $326.5 million in 2018, $289.8 million in 2017, and $250.7 million in 2016.2018.
Note 2526 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments, Guarantees and Other Commitments. Northern Trust, in the normal course of business, enters into various types of commitments and issues letters of credit to meet the liquidity and credit enhancement needs of its clients. The contractual amounts of these instruments represent the potential credit exposure should the instrument be fully drawn upon and the client default. To control the credit risk associated with entering into commitments and issuing letters of credit, Northern Trust subjects such activities to the same credit quality and monitoring controls as its lending activities.
The following table provides details of Northern Trust's off-balance sheet financial instruments as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

TABLE 128: SUMMARY OF OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
20202019
($ In Millions)ONE YEAR AND LESSOVER ONE YEARTOTALONE YEAR AND LESSOVER ONE YEARTOTAL
Undrawn Commitments to Extend Credit(1)
$11,260.5 $17,678.0 $28,938.5 $7,500.2 $16,906.0 $24,406.2 
Standby Letters of Credit and Financial Guarantees(2)
1,228.1 763.5 1,991.6 1,567.6 845.9 2,413.5 
Commercial Letters of Credit54.6 0 54.6 32.3 32.3 
Custody Securities Lent with Indemnification157,478.0 0 157,478.0 138,085.9 138,085.9 
Total Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments$170,021.2 $18,441.5 $188,462.7 $147,186.0 $17,751.9 $164,937.9 
(1) These amounts exclude $384.7 million and $243.6 million of commitments participated to others at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
(2) These amounts include $24.2 million and $44.5 million of standby letters of credit secured by cash deposits or participated to others as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Undrawn Commitments to Extend Credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since a significant portion of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future loans or liquidity requirements.
Standby Letters of Credit obligate Northern Trust to meet certain financial obligations of its clients, if, under the contractual terms of the agreement, the clients are unable to do so. These instruments are primarily issued to support public and private financial commitments, including commercial paper, bond financing, initial margin requirements on futures exchanges, and similar transactions. Northern Trust is obligated to meet the entire financial obligation of these agreements and in certain cases is able to recover the amounts paid through recourse against collateral received or other participants.
Financial Guarantees are issued by Northern Trust to guarantee the performance of a client to a third party under certain arrangements.
Commercial Letters of Credit are instruments issued by Northern Trust on behalf of its clients that authorize a third party (the beneficiary) to draw drafts up to a stipulated amount under the specified terms and conditions of the agreement and other similar instruments. Commercial letters of credit are issued primarily to facilitate international trade.
Custody Securities Lent with Indemnification involves Northern Trust lending securities owned by clients to borrowers who are reviewed and approved by the Northern Trust Capital Markets Credit Committee, as part of its securities custody activities and at the direction of its clients. In connection with these activities, Northern Trust has issued indemnifications to certain clients against certain losses that are a direct result of a borrower’s failure to return securities when due, should the value of such securities exceed the value of the collateral required to be posted. Borrowers are required to collateralize fully securities received with cash or marketable securities. As securities are loaned, collateral is maintained at a minimum 100% of the fair value of the securities plus accrued interest. The collateral is revalued on a daily basis. The amount of securities loaned as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 subject to indemnification was $157.5 billion and $138.1 billion, respectively. Because of the credit quality of the borrowers and the requirement to fully collateralize securities borrowed, management believes that the exposure to credit loss from this activity is not significant and 0 liability was recorded at December 31, 2020, or 2019 related to these indemnifications.

2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 151

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Legal Proceedings. In the normal course of business, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are routinely defendants in or parties to pending and threatened legal actions, and are subject to regulatory examinations, information-gathering requests, investigations, and proceedings, both formal and informal. In certain legal actions, claims for substantial monetary damages are asserted. In regulatory matters, claims for disgorgement, restitution, penalties and/or other remedial actions or sanctions may be sought.
Based on current knowledge, after consultation with legal counsel and after taking into account current accruals, management does not believe that losses, fines or penalties, if any, arising from pending litigation or threatened legal actions or regulatory matters either individually or in the aggregate, after giving effect to applicable reserves and insurance coverage will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the Corporation, although such matters could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s operating results for a particular period.
Under GAAP, (i) an event is “probable” if the “future event or events are likely to occur”; (ii) an event is “reasonably possible” if “the chance of the future event or events occurring is more than remote but less than likely”; and (iii) an event is “remote” if “the chance of the future event or events occurring is slight.”
The outcome of litigation and regulatory matters is inherently difficult to predict and/or the range of loss often cannot be reasonably estimated, particularly for matters that (i) will be decided by a jury, (ii) are in early stages, (iii) involve uncertainty as to the likelihood of a class being certified or the ultimate size of the class, (iv) are subject to appeals or motions, (v) involve significant factual issues to be resolved, including with respect to the amount of damages, (vi) do not specify the amount of damages sought or (vii) seek very large damages based on novel and complex damage and liability legal theories. Accordingly, the Corporation cannot reasonably estimate the eventual outcome of these pending matters, the timing of their ultimate resolution or what the eventual loss, fines or penalties, if any, related to each pending matter will be.
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Corporation records accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. When loss contingencies are not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Corporation does not record accruals. NoNaN material accruals have been recorded for pending litigation or threatened legal actions or regulatory matters.
For a limited number of matters for which a loss is reasonably possible in future periods, whether in excess of an accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, the Corporation is able to estimate a range of possible loss. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Corporation has estimated the range of reasonably possible loss for these matters to be from zero0 to approximately $20 million in the aggregate. The Corporation’s estimate with respect to the aggregate range of reasonably possible loss is based upon currently available information and is subject to significant judgment and a variety of assumptions and known and unknown uncertainties. The matters underlying the estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from the current estimate.
In certain other pending matters, there may be a range of reasonably possible loss (including reasonably possible loss in excess of amounts accrued) that cannot be reasonably estimated for the reasons described above. Such matters are not included in the estimated range of reasonably possible loss discussed above.
In 2015, Northern Trust Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) Limited (NTFS), an indirect subsidiary of the Corporation, was charged by a French investigating magistrate judge with complicity in estate tax fraud in connection with the administration of two2 trusts for which it serves as trustee. Charges also were brought against a number of other persons and entities related to this matter. In 2017, a French court found no estate tax fraud had occurred and NTFS and all other persons and entities charged were acquitted. The Public Prosecutor’s Office of France appealed the court decision and in June 2018 a French appellate court issued its opinion on the matter, acquitting all persons and entities charged, including NTFS. The Public Prosecutor’s Office of France has appealed the appellate court’s decision toIn January 2021, the Cour de Cassation, the highest court in France.France, reversed the June 2018 appellate court ruling, requiring a re-trial at the appellate court level. The re-trial proceedings in the appellate court have not yet been scheduled. As trustee, NTFS provided no tax advice and had no involvement in the preparation or filing of the challenged estate tax filings.
In the first quarter of 2018, Northern Trust received a document request from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Division of Enforcement, seeking the production of documents related to the Bank’s activities as a swap dealer provisionally registered with the CFTC. Northern Trust has responded to the CFTC’s document request. In

148   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

addition, the National Futures Association (NFA) provided the Bank with a letter dated April 30, 2018, summarizing certain findings related to the Bank’s swap dealer compliance program identified during a then-recently completed examination. Northern Trust is addressing the findings identified by the NFA in its examination and cooperating with both the NFA and the CFTC.
Visa Class B Common Shares. Northern Trust, as a member of Visa U.S.A. Inc. (Visa U.S.A.) and in connection with the 2007 restructuring of Visa U.S.A. and its affiliates and the 2008 initial public offering of Visa Inc. (Visa), received certain Visa Class B common shares. The Visa Class B common shares are subject to certain selling restrictions until the final resolution of thecertain litigation related to interchange fees involving Visa (the covered litigation noted below,litigation), at which time the shares are convertible into Visa Class A common shares based on a conversion rate dependent upon the ultimate cost of resolving the covered litigation. On June 28, 2018, and September 27, 2019, Visa deposited an additional $600 million and $300 million, respectively, into thean escrow account previously established with respect to the covered litigation. As a result of the additional contributions to the escrow account, the rate at which Visa Class B common shares will convert into Visa Class A common shares was reduced.
In September 2018, Visa announced thatreached a proposed class settlement agreement covering damage claims but not injunctive relief claims regarding the covered litigation was reached, with Visa’s sharelitigation. In December 2019, the district court granted final approval for the proposed class settlement agreement. Certain merchants have opted out of the proposedclass settlement amount to be satisfied through funds previously deposited withand are pursuing claims separately,



152 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
while other merchants have appealed the court and the $600 million placed into escrow in June 2018. The agreement has been preliminarily approvedapproval order granted by the district court, and, if final approval is granted, objecting parties may appeal. Further, individual merchants may opt out of the proposed settlement and pursue claims separately. For these and other reasons, thecourt. The ultimate resolution of the covered litigation, the timing for removal of the selling restrictions on the Visa Class B common shares and the rate at which such shares will ultimately convert into Visa Class A common shares are uncertain.
In June 2016 and 2015, Northern Trust recorded a $123.1 million and $99.9 million net gain on the sale of 1.1 million and 1.0 million of its Visa Class B common shares, respectively. These sales do not affect Northern Trust’s risk related to the impact of the covered litigation on the rate at which such shares will ultimately convert into Visa Class A common shares. Northern Trust continued to hold approximately 4.1 million Visa Class B common shares, which are recorded at their original cost basis of zero0, as of both December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


Clearing and Settlement Organizations. The Bank is a participating member of various cash, securities, and foreign exchange clearing and settlement organizations. It participates in these organizations on behalf of its clients and on its own behalf as a result of its own activities. A wide variety of cash and securities transactions are settled through these organizations, including those involving obligations of states and political subdivisions, asset-backed securities, commercial paper, dollar placements, and securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association.
As a result of its participation in cash, securities, and foreign exchange clearing and settlement organizations, the Bank could be responsible for a pro rata share of certain credit-related losses arising out of the clearing activities. The method in which such losses would be shared by the clearing members is stipulated in each clearing organization’s membership agreement. Credit exposure related to these agreements varies from day to day, primarily as a result of fluctuations in the volume of transactions cleared through the organizations. At December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, we have not recorded any material liabilities under these arrangements. Controls related to these clearing transactions are closely monitored by management to protect the assets of Northern Trust and its clients.
Note 2627 – Derivative Financial Instruments
Northern Trust is a party to various derivative financial instruments that are used in the normal course of business to meet the needs of its clients;clients, as part of its trading activity for its own account; and as part of its risk management activities. These instruments may include foreign exchange contracts, interest rate contracts, total return swap contracts, credit default swap contracts, and swaps related to the sale of certain Visa Class B common shares. Please refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for the significant accounting policies for derivative financial instruments.


Foreign exchange contracts are agreements to exchange specific amounts of currencies at a future date, at a specified rate of exchange. Foreign exchange contracts are entered into primarily to meet the foreign exchange needs of clients. Foreign exchange contracts are also used for trading and risk management purposes. For risk management purposes, Northern Trust uses foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates relating to certain forecasted non-functional currency denominated revenue and expenditure transactions, foreign-currency- denominated assets and liabilities, including debt securities and net investments in non-U.S. affiliates.


Interest rate contracts include swap and option contracts. Interest rate swap contracts involve the exchange of fixed and floating rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying principal amounts. Northern Trust enters into interest rate swap contracts with its clients and also may utilize such contracts to reduce or eliminate the

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 149

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

exposure to changes in the cash flows or fair value of hedged assets or liabilities due to changes in interest rates. Interest rate option contracts may include caps, floors, collars and swaptions, and provide for the transfer or reduction of interest rate risk, typically in exchange for a fee. Northern Trust enters into option contracts as a seller of interest rate protection to clients. Northern Trust receives a fee at the outset of the agreement for the assumption of the risk of an unfavorable change in interest rates. This assumed interest rate risk is then mitigated by entering into an offsetting position with an outside counterparty. Northern Trust may also purchase or enter into option contracts for risk management purposes including to reduce the exposure to changes in the cash flows of hedged assets due to changes in interest rates.


2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 153

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table shows the notional and fair values of all derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 20182020 and December 31, 2017.2019.


TABLE 114:129: NOTIONAL AND FAIR VALUES OF DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
FAIR VALUEFAIR VALUE
(In Millions)NOTIONAL
VALUE
ASSET(1)
LIABILITY(2)
NOTIONAL
VALUE
ASSET(1)
LIABILITY(2)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging under GAAP
Interest Rate Contracts
Fair Value Hedges$4,717.6 $8.2 $10.2 $4,538.2 $20.3 $20.9 
Cash Flow Hedges50.0 0.1 0 200.0 0.2 0.2 
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Cash Flow Hedges6,554.4 15.4 104.0 1,661.5 8.5 11.5 
Net Investment Hedges3,480.3 0.1 207.7 2,873.8 73.7 11.9 
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging under GAAP$14,802.3 $23.8 $321.9 $9,273.5 $102.7 $44.5 
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging under GAAP
Non-Designated Risk Management Derivatives
Foreign Exchange Contracts$67.7 $0.1 $0.1 $176.5 $0.9 $0.7 
Other Financial Derivatives(3)
745.4 0 35.3 640.3 33.4 
Total Non-Designated Risk Management Derivatives$813.1 $0.1 $35.4 $816.8 $0.9 $34.1 
Client-Related and Trading Derivatives
Foreign Exchange Contracts$320,563.4 $4,245.1 $4,410.7 $291,533.6 $3,151.7 $3,158.1 
Interest Rate Contracts10,573.3 289.2 114.8 8,976.8 132.4 76.3 
Total Client-Related and Trading Derivatives$331,136.7 $4,534.3 $4,525.5 $300,510.4 $3,284.1 $3,234.4 
Total Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging under GAAP$331,949.8 $4,534.4 $4,560.9 $301,327.2 $3,285.0 $3,268.5 
Total Gross Derivatives$346,752.1 $4,558.2 $4,882.8 $310,600.7 $3,387.7 $3,313.0 
Less: Netting(4)
3,507.8 2,817.1 2,338.0 1,618.4 
Total Derivative Financial Instruments$1,050.4 $2,065.7 $1,049.7 $1,694.6 
 DECEMBER 31, 2018DECEMBER 31, 2017
  FAIR VALUE FAIR VALUE
(In Millions)
NOTIONAL
VALUE

ASSET 1

LIABILITY 2

NOTIONAL
VALUE

ASSET 1

LIABILITY 2

Derivatives Designated as Hedging under GAAP      
Interest Rate Contracts      
      Fair Value Hedges$4,590.4
$29.8
$23.3
$4,473.1
$31.7
$18.2
      Cash Flow Hedges600.0
0.2
1.2
925.0
0.2
1.2
Foreign Exchange Contracts      
      Cash Flow Hedges2,648.2
13.8
57.8
3,289.0
28.4
13.0
      Net Investment Hedges3,475.1
292.4
14.5
3,011.3
0.6
179.5
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging under GAAP$11,313.7
$336.2
$96.8
$11,698.4
$60.9
$211.9
       
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging under GAAP      
Non-Designated Risk Management Derivatives      
Foreign Exchange Contracts$122.2
$0.5
$0.2
$214.1
$1.1
$0.1
Other Financial Derivatives 3
483.4
1.3
32.8
404.7

30.4
Total Non-Designated Risk Management Derivatives$605.6
$1.8
$33.0
$618.8
$1.1
$30.5
       
Client-Related and Trading Derivatives











Foreign Exchange Contracts$281,864.4
$2,159.4
$2,190.0
$317,882.5
$2,527.0
$2,522.5
Interest Rate Contracts7,711.2
66.1
68.6
7,418.0
65.1
64.1
Total Client-Related and Trading Derivatives$289,575.6
$2,225.5
$2,258.6
$325,300.5
$2,592.1
$2,586.6
       
Total Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging under GAAP$290,181.2
$2,227.3
$2,291.6
$325,919.3
$2,593.2
$2,617.1
       
Total Gross Derivatives$301,494.9
$2,563.5
$2,388.4
$337,617.7
$2,654.1
$2,829.0
Less: Netting 4
 1,357.1
1,796.3
 1,860.0
1,621.4
Total Derivative Financial Instruments $1,206.4
$592.1
 $794.1
$1,207.6
(1) Derivative assets are reported in other assetsOther Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Derivative liabilities are reported in other liabilitiesOther Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
(3) This line includes swaps related to sales of certain Visa Class B common shares and total return swap contracts.shares.
(4) See further detail in Note 27 - Offsetting28, "Offsetting of Assets and Liabilities."
Notional amounts of derivative financial instruments do not represent credit risk, and are not recorded inon the consolidated balance sheets. They are used merely to express the volume of this activity. Northern Trust’s credit-related risk of loss is limited to the positive fair value of the derivative instrument, net of any collateral received, which is significantly less than the notional amount.



150   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Hedging Derivative Instruments Designated Underunder GAAP. Northern Trust uses derivative instruments to hedge its exposure to foreign currency, interest rate, and equity price, and credit risk.price. Certain hedging relationships are formally designated and qualify for hedge accounting under GAAP as fair value, cash flow or net investment hedges. Other derivatives that are entered into for risk management purposes as economic hedges are not formally designated as hedges and changes in fair value are recognized currently in other operatingOther Operating Income within the consolidated statements of income (see below section “Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedging under GAAP”).
Fair Value Hedges. Derivatives are designated as fair value hedges to limit Northern Trust’s exposure to changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities due to movements in interest rates.
Cash Flow Hedges. Derivatives are also designated as cash flow hedges in order to minimize the variability in cash flows of earning assets or forecasted transactions caused by movements in interest or foreign exchange rates.
There were no0 material gains or losses reclassified into earnings during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018 as a result of the discontinuance of forecasted transactions that were no longer probable of occurring. It is estimated that net gainslosses of $3.1$3.2 million and $1.4$83.1 million will be reclassified into net income within the next twelve months relating to cash flow hedges of foreign-currency-denominated transactions and cash flow hedges of foreign-currency-denominated debt securities, respectively. It is estimated that a net lossgain of $1.2$0.1 million will be reclassified into net income upon the



154 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
receipt of interest payments on earning assets within the next twelve months relating to cash flow hedges of available for sale debt securities. As of December 31, 2018,2020, 23 months was the maximum length of time over which the exposure to variability in future cash flows of forecasted foreign-currency-denominated transactions was being hedged. There was no ineffectiveness recognized in earnings for cash flow hedges during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 151

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table provides fair value and cash flow hedge derivative gains and losses recognized in income during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016.2018.


TABLE 115:130: LOCATION AND AMOUNT OF FAIR VALUE AND CASH FLOW HEDGE DERIVATIVE GAINS AND LOSSES RECORDED IN INCOME
(in Millions)INTEREST INCOMEINTEREST EXPENSEOTHER OPERATING INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31,202020192018202020192018202020192018
Total amounts on the consolidated statements of income$1,643.5 $2,499.9 $2,321.4 $200.3 $822.0 $698.7 $194.0 $145.5 $127.5 
Gains (Losses) on fair value hedges recognized on
Interest Rate Contracts
Recognized on derivatives(66.3)(95.9)13.9 100.2 99.4 (9.5)0 
Recognized on hedged items66.3 95.9 (13.9)(100.2)(99.4)9.5 0 
Amounts related to interest settlements on derivatives(13.2)21.2 17.8 29.9 5.2 7.9 0 
Total gains (losses) recognized on fair value hedges$(13.2)$21.2 $17.8 $29.9 $5.2 $7.9 $0 $$
Gains (Losses) on cash flow hedges recognized on
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Net gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI to net income27.4 26.4 67.4 0 0.2 0.8 3.9 
Interest Rate Contracts
Net gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI to net income0.5 (0.5)(0.2)0 0 
Total gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI to net income on cash flow hedges$27.9 $25.9 $67.2 $0 $$$0.2 $0.8 $3.9 
  Location and Amount of Derivative Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income
(in Millions) Interest Income Interest Expense Other Operating Income Other Operating Expense
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
2017
2016
 2018
2017
2016
 2018
2017
2016
 2018
2017
2016
Total amounts on the consolidated statements of income $2,321.4
$1,769.4
$1,416.9
 $698.7
$340.2
$182.0
 $127.5
$157.5
$241.2
 $330.6
$331.6
$364.4
Gains/(Losses) on fair value hedges recognized on                
Interest Rate Contracts                
Recognized on derivatives 13.9
8.8
80.6
 (9.5)(24.3)(33.9) 


 


Recognized on hedged items (13.9)(8.8)(80.6) 9.5
24.3
33.9
 


 


Amounts related to interest settlements on derivatives 17.8
(9.6)(16.9) 7.9
27.7
38.9
 


 


Total gain/(loss) recognized on fair value hedges $17.8
$(9.6)$(16.9)
$7.9
$27.7
$38.9

$
$
$

$
$
$
                 
Gains/(Losses) on cash flow hedges recognized on                
Foreign Exchange Contracts                
Net gain/(loss) reclassified from AOCI to net income 67.4
19.3
6.4
 


 3.9
5.0
(6.4) 
(0.1)(0.9)
Interest Rate Contracts                
Net gain/(loss) reclassified from AOCI to net income (0.2)0.3
2.8
 


 


 


Total gain/(loss) reclassified from AOCI to net income on cash flow hedges $67.2
$19.6
$9.2

$
$
$

$3.9
$5.0
$(6.4)
$
$(0.1)$(0.9)


152   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The following table provides the impact of fair value hedge accounting on the carrying value of the designated hedged items as of December 31, 2018.2020 and 2019.


TABLE 116:131: HEDGED ITEMS IN FAIR VALUE HEDGES
DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
(In Millions)CARRYING VALUE OF THE HEDGED ITEMS
CUMULATIVE HEDGE ACCOUNTING BASIS ADJUSTMENT(1)
CARRYING VALUE OF THE HEDGED ITEMS
CUMULATIVE HEDGE ACCOUNTING BASIS ADJUSTMENT(2)
Available for Sale Debt Securities(3)
$2,075.1 $48.8 $2,981.0 $3.3 
Senior Notes and Long-Term Subordinated Debt2,745.1 221.5 1,748.5 126.9 
Total$4,820.2 $270.3 $4,729.5 $130.2 
 DECEMBER 31, 2018
(In Millions)CARRYING VALUE OF THE HEDGED ITEMS
 
CUMULATIVE HEDGE ACCOUNTING BASIS ADJUSTMENT 1

Available for Sale Debt Securities 2
$3,831.6
 $99.4
Senior Notes and Long-Term Subordinated Debt1,248.8
 29.3
    
Total$5,080.4
 $128.7
(1)The cumulative hedge accounting basis adjustment includes $10.4 million related to discontinued hedging relationships of available for sale debt securities as of December 31, 2020. There are no0 amounts related to discontinued hedging relationships.relationships in the cumulative hedge accounting basis adjustment of senior notes and long-term debt as of December 31, 2020.
(2) The cumulative hedge accounting basis adjustment includes $1.5 million related to discontinued hedging relationships of available for sale debt securities as of December 31, 2019. There were 0 amounts related to discontinued hedging relationships in the cumulative hedge accounting basis adjustment of senior notes and long-term debt as of December 31, 2019.
(3) Carrying value represents amortized cost.


Net Investment Hedges. Certain foreign exchange contracts and qualifying non-derivative instruments are designated as net investment hedges to minimize Northern Trust’s exposure to variability in the foreign currency translation of net investments in non-U.S. branches and subsidiaries. For net investment hedges, there was no ineffectiveness recorded for these hedges during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Net investment hedge losses of $178.7 million and gains of $173.0 million and losses of $223.2$59.7 million were recognized in AOCI related to foreign exchange contracts for the years ended December 31, 20182020 and December 31, 2017,2019, respectively.
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedging under GAAP. Northern Trust’s derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging under GAAP include derivatives for purposes of client-related and trading activities, as well as other risk management purposes. These activities consist principally of providing foreign exchange services to clients in connection with Northern Trust’s global custody business. However, in the normal course of business, Northern Trust also engages in trading of currencies for its own account.
Non-designated risk management derivatives include foreign exchange contracts entered into to manage the foreign currency risk of non-U.S.-dollar-denominated assets and liabilities, the net investment in certain non-U.S. affiliates,
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 155

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
commercial loans, and forecasted foreign-currency-denominated transactions. Swaps related to the salesales of certain Visa Class B common shares were entered into pursuant to which retainNorthern Trust retains the risks associated with the ultimate conversion of the Visa Class B common shares into shares of Visa Class A common shares. Credit default swaps were entered into to manage the credit risk associated with certain loans and loan commitments. Total return swaps are entered into to manage the equity price risk associated with certain investments.
Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedges under GAAP are recognized currently in income. The following table provides the location and amount of gains and losses recorded inon the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018 for derivative instruments not designated as hedges under GAAP.


TABLE 117:132: LOCATION AND AMOUNT OF GAINS AND LOSSES RECORDED IN INCOME FOR DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING UNDER GAAP
(In Millions)LOCATION OF DERIVATIVE GAIN / (LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN INCOMEAMOUNT OF DERIVATIVE GAIN / (LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN INCOME(In Millions)DERIVATIVE GAINS (LOSSES) LOCATION RECOGNIZED IN INCOMEAMOUNT OF DERIVATIVE GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED IN INCOME
201820172016202020192018
Non-designated risk management derivatives  Non-designated risk management derivatives
Foreign Exchange ContractsOther Operating Income$(4.1)$8.2
$(6.7)Foreign Exchange ContractsOther Operating Income$6.4 $(1.6)$(4.1)
Other Financial Derivatives (1)
Other Operating Income(19.2)(13.3)(6.1)
Other Financial Derivatives(1)
Other Operating Income(18.3)(20.0)(19.2)
Gains/(Losses) from non-designated risk management derivatives $(23.3)$(5.1)$(12.8)
  
Gains (Losses) from non-designated risk management derivativesGains (Losses) from non-designated risk management derivatives$(11.9)$(21.6)$(23.3)
Client-related and trading derivatives  Client-related and trading derivatives
Foreign Exchange ContractsForeign Exchange Trading Income307.2
209.9
236.6
Foreign Exchange ContractsForeign Exchange Trading Income$290.4 $250.9 $307.2 
Interest Rate ContractsSecurity Commissions and Trading Income7.7
10.7
11.4
Interest Rate ContractsSecurity Commissions and Trading Income22.4 12.9 7.7 
Gains/(Losses) from client-related and trading derivatives $314.9
$220.6
$248.0
  
Total gains/(losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging under GAAP $291.6
$215.5
$235.2
Gains (Losses) from client-related and trading derivativesGains (Losses) from client-related and trading derivatives$312.8 $263.8 $314.9 
Total gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging under GAAPTotal gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging under GAAP$300.9 $242.2 $291.6 
(1) This line includes swaps related to the sale of certain Visa Class B common shares credit default swap contracts, and total return swap contracts.




2018156 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation153

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 2728 – Offsetting of Assets and Liabilities
The following table provides information regarding the offsetting of derivative assets and of securities purchased under agreements to resell within the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


TABLE 118:133: OFFSETTING OF DERIVATIVE ASSETS AND SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER AGREEMENTS TO RESELL
DECEMBER 31, 2020
(In Millions)GROSS
RECOGNIZED
ASSETS
GROSS AMOUNTS OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET(2)
NET AMOUNTS PRESENTED IN THE BALANCE SHEETGROSS AMOUNTS NOT OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET AMOUNT(3)
Derivative Assets(1)
Foreign Exchange Contracts Over the Counter (OTC)$3,799.7 $3,505.3 $294.4 $0.9 $293.5 
Interest Rate Swaps OTC295.9 2.5 293.4  293.4 
Interest Rate Swaps Exchange Cleared1.6 0 1.6  1.6 
Total Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement4,097.2 3,507.8 589.4 0.9 588.5 
Total Derivatives Not Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement461.0  461.0 0 461.0 
Total Derivatives4,558.2 3,507.8 1,050.4 0.9 1,049.5 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell$1,596.5 $ $1,596.5 $1,596.5 $ 
DECEMBER 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
(In Millions)
GROSS
RECOGNIZED
ASSETS

GROSS AMOUNTS OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET AMOUNTS PRESENTED IN THE BALANCE SHEET
GROSS AMOUNTS NOT OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET
AMOUNT(3)

(In Millions)GROSS
RECOGNIZED
ASSETS
GROSS AMOUNTS OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET(2)
NET AMOUNTS PRESENTED IN THE BALANCE SHEETGROSS AMOUNTS NOT OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET AMOUNT(3)
Derivative Assets(1)
 
Derivative Assets(1)
Foreign Exchange Contracts Over the Counter (OTC)$1,902.3
$1,175.3
$727.0
$12.7
$714.3
Foreign Exchange Contracts OTCForeign Exchange Contracts OTC$2,691.1 $2,334.1 $357.0 $16.5 $340.5 
Interest Rate Swaps OTC71.6
19.0
52.6

52.6
Interest Rate Swaps OTC151.9 3.9 148.0 — 148.0 
Interest Rate Swaps Exchange Cleared24.5
24.4
0.1

0.1
Interest Rate Swaps Exchange Cleared1.0 1.0 — 1.0 
Other Financial Derivative1.3

1.3

1.3
Cross Product Netting Adjustment
3.9



Cross Product Collateral Adjustment
134.5



 
Total Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement1,999.7
1,357.1
642.6
12.7
629.9
Total Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement2,844.0 2,338.0 506.0 16.5 489.5 
 
Total Derivatives Not Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement563.8

563.8
2.7
561.1
Total Derivatives Not Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement543.7 — 543.7 0.3 543.4 
 
Total Derivatives2,563.5
1,357.1
1,206.4
15.4
1,191.0
Total Derivatives3,387.7 2,338.0 1,049.7 16.8 1,032.9 
 
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell(2)
$1,031.2
$
$1,031.2
$1,031.2
$
Securities Purchased under Agreements to ResellSecurities Purchased under Agreements to Resell$707.8 $— $707.8 $707.8 $— 

December 31, 2017
(In Millions)GROSS
RECOGNIZED
ASSETS

GROSS AMOUNTS OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET AMOUNTS PRESENTED IN THE BALANCE SHEET
GROSS AMOUNTS NOT OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET
AMOUNT
(3)

Derivative Assets(1)
     
Foreign Exchange Contracts Over the Counter (OTC)$2,106.3
$1,397.7
$708.6
$2.1
$706.5
Interest Rate Swaps OTC86.9
14.2
72.7

72.7
Interest Rate Swaps Exchange Cleared10.1
10.1



Cross Product Netting Adjustment
10.4



Cross Product Collateral Adjustment
427.6



     

Total Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement2,203.3
1,860.0
343.3
2.1
341.2
      
Total Derivatives Not Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement450.8

450.8
2.5
448.3
      
Total Derivatives2,654.1
1,860.0
794.1
4.6
789.5
      
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell(2)
$1,303.3
$
$1,303.3
$1,303.3
$

(1) Derivative assets are reported in other assets inOther Assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Other assetsAssets (excluding derivative assets) totaled $4.6$7.3 billion and $3.9$7.4 billion as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
(2) Securities purchased under agreements to resell are reported in federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell in the consolidated balance sheets. Federal funds sold totaled $134.0 million and $21.0 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Including cash collateral received from counterparties.
(3) Northern Trust did not possess any cash collateral that was not offset inon the consolidated balance sheets that could have been used to offset the net amounts presented inon the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.



154   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation157


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table provides information regarding the offsetting of derivative liabilities and of securities sold under agreements to repurchase within the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


TABLE 119:134: OFFSETTING OF DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES AND SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
DECEMBER 31, 2020
(In Millions)GROSS
RECOGNIZED
LIABILITIES
GROSS AMOUNTS OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET(2)
NET AMOUNTS PRESENTED IN THE BALANCE SHEETGROSS AMOUNTS NOT OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET
AMOUNT(3)
Derivative Liabilities(1)
Foreign Exchange Contracts OTC$3,577.7 $2,718.6 $859.1 $0.5 $858.6 
Interest Rate Swaps OTC125.0 98.5 26.5  26.5 
Interest Rate Swaps Exchange Cleared0 0 0  0 
Other Financial Derivatives35.3 0 35.3  35.3 
Total Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement3,738.0 2,817.1 920.9 0.5 920.4 
Total Derivatives Not Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement1,144.8  1,144.8  1,144.8 
Total Derivatives4,882.8 2,817.1 2,065.7 0.5 2,065.2 
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase$39.8 $ $39.8 $39.8 $ 
DECEMBER 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
(In Millions)
GROSS
RECOGNIZED
LIABILITIES

GROSS AMOUNTS OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET AMOUNTS PRESENTED IN THE BALANCE SHEET
GROSS AMOUNTS NOT OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET
AMOUNT(2)

(In Millions)GROSS
RECOGNIZED
LIABILITIES
GROSS AMOUNTS OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET(2)
NET AMOUNTS PRESENTED IN THE BALANCE SHEETGROSS AMOUNTS NOT OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET
AMOUNT
(3)
Derivative Liabilities(1)
 
Derivative Liabilities(1)
Foreign Exchange Contracts OTC$1,821.0
$1,175.3
$645.7
$
$645.7
Foreign Exchange Contracts OTC$2,181.6 $1,548.6 $633.0 $0.1 $632.9 
Interest Rate Swaps OTC68.8
19.0
49.8

49.8
Interest Rate Swaps OTC96.7 57.3 39.4 — 39.4 
Interest Rate Swaps Exchange Cleared24.4
24.4



Interest Rate Swaps Exchange Cleared0.7 0.7 — 0.7 
Other Financial Derivatives32.8

32.8

32.8
Other Financial Derivatives33.4 12.5 20.9 — 20.9 
Cross Product Netting Adjustment
3.9



Cross Product Collateral Adjustment
573.7



 
Total Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement1,947.0
1,796.3
150.7

150.7
Total Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement2,312.4 1,618.4 694.0 0.1 693.9 
 
Total Derivatives Not Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement441.4

441.4

441.4
Total Derivatives Not Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement1,000.6 — 1,000.6 — 1,000.6 
 
Total Derivatives2,388.4
1,796.3
592.1

592.1
Total Derivatives3,313.0 1,618.4 1,694.6 0.1 1,694.5 
 
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase$168.3
$
$168.3
$168.3
$
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase$489.7 $— $489.7 $489.7 $— 

December 31, 2017
(In Millions)GROSS
RECOGNIZED
LIABILITIES

GROSS AMOUNTS OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET AMOUNTS PRESENTED IN THE BALANCE SHEET
GROSS AMOUNTS NOT OFFSET IN THE BALANCE SHEET
NET
AMOUNT
(2)

Derivative Liabilities(1)
     
Foreign Exchange Contracts OTC$1,889.2
$1,397.7
$491.5
$
$491.5
Interest Rate Swaps OTC69.2
14.2
55.0

55.0
Interest Rate Swaps Exchange Cleared14.3
10.1
4.2

4.2
Other Financial Derivatives30.4

30.4

30.4
Cross Product Netting Adjustment
10.4



Cross Product Collateral Adjustment
189.0



      
Total Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement2,003.1
1,621.4
381.7

381.7
      
Total Derivatives Not Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement825.9

825.9

825.9
      
Total Derivatives2,829.0
1,621.4
1,207.6

1,207.6
      
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase$834.0
$
$834.0
$834.0
$

(1) Derivative liabilities are reported in other liabilities inOther Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Other liabilitiesLiabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) totaled $2.5$3.5 billion and $2.4$3.1 billion as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
(2) Including cash collateral deposited with counterparties.
(3) Northern Trust did not place any cash collateral with counterparties that was not offset inon the consolidated balance sheets that could have been used to offset the net amounts presented inon the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


All of Northern Trust’s securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) and securities purchased under agreements to resell (reverse repurchase agreements) involve the transfer of financial assets in exchange for cash subject to a right and obligation to repurchase those assets for an agreed upon amount. In the event of a repurchase failure, the cash or financial assets are available for offset. All of Northern Trust’s repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements are subject to a master netting arrangement, which sets forth the rights and obligations for repurchase and offset. Under the master netting arrangement, Northern Trust is entitled to set off receivables from and collateral placed with a single counterparty against obligations owed to that counterparty. In addition, collateral held by Northern Trust can be offset against receivables from that counterparty. However, Northern Trust’s repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements do not meet the requirements to net.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 155

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

net under GAAP.
Derivative asset and liability positions with a single counterparty can be offset against each other in cases where legally enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements exist. Derivative assets and liabilities can be further offset by cash collateral received from, and deposited with, the transacting counterparty. The basis for this view is that, upon termination of transactions subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement, the individual derivative receivables do not represent resources to which general creditors have rights and individual derivative payables do not represent claims that are equivalent to the claims of general creditors.
Credit risk associated with derivative instruments relates to the failure of the counterparty and the failure of Northern Trust to pay based on the contractual terms of the agreement, and is generally limited to the unrealized fair value gains and



158 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
losses on these instruments, net of any collateral received or deposited. The amount of credit risk will increase or decrease during the lives of the instruments as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, or equity prices or credit spreads fluctuate. Northern Trust’s risk is controlled by limiting such activity to an approved list of counterparties and by subjecting such activity to the same credit and quality controls as are followed in lending and investment activities. Credit Support Annexes and other similar agreements are currently in place with a number of Northern Trust’s counterparties which mitigate the aforementioned credit risk associated with derivative activity conducted with those counterparties by requiring that significant net unrealized fair value gains be supported by collateral placed with Northern Trust.
Additional cash collateral received from and deposited with derivative counterparties totaling $27.6$111.0 million and $91.5$49.0 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2018,2020, and $67.0$196.3 million and $143.1$2.0 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2017,2019, was not offset against derivative assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as the amounts exceeded the net derivative positions with those counterparties.
Certain master netting arrangements Northern Trust enters into with derivative counterparties contain credit risk-related contingent features in which the counterparty has the option to declare Northern Trust in default and accelerate cash settlement of net derivative liabilities with the counterparty in the event Northern Trust’s credit rating falls below specified levels. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position was $324.1$1,648.2 million and $223.7$766.2 million at December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. Cash collateral amounts deposited with derivative counterparties on those dates included $316.5$1,044.0 million and $35.8$327.1 million, respectively, posted against these liabilities, resulting in a net maximum amount of termination payments that could have been required at December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 of $7.6$604.2 million and $187.9$439.1 million, respectively. Accelerated settlement of these liabilities would not have a material effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of Northern Trust.
Note 28 – Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments
Commitments and Letters of Credit. Northern Trust, in the normal course of business, enters into various types of commitments and issues letters of credit to meet the liquidity and credit enhancement needs of its clients. The contractual amounts of these instruments represent the potential credit exposure should the instrument be fully drawn upon and the client default. To control the credit risk associated with entering into commitments and issuing letters of credit, Northern Trust subjects such activities to the same credit quality and monitoring controls as its lending activities. Commitments and letters of credit consist of the following:

Legally Binding Commitments to Extend Credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since a significant portion of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future loans or liquidity requirements.
Standby Letters of Credit obligate Northern Trust to meet certain financial obligations of its clients, if, under the contractual terms of the agreement, the clients are unable to do so. These instruments are primarily issued to support public and private financial commitments, including commercial paper, bond financing, initial margin requirements on futures exchanges, and similar transactions. Northern Trust is obligated to meet the entire financial obligation of these agreements and in certain cases is able to recover the amounts paid through recourse against collateral received or other participants.
Commercial Letters of Credit are instruments issued by Northern Trust on behalf of its clients that authorize a third party (the beneficiary) to draw drafts up to a stipulated amount under the specified terms and conditions of the agreement and other similar instruments. Commercial letters of credit are issued primarily to facilitate international trade.

156   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table shows the contractual amounts of commitments and letters of credit.

TABLE 120: COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT

                      DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
Legally Binding Commitments to Extend Credit(1)
$25,023.0
$26,822.6
Standby Letters of Credit(2)
2,486.2
2,970.0
Commercial Letters of Credit32.3
37.7

(1)These amounts exclude $242.3 million and $385.5 million of commitments participated to others at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(2)These amounts include $72.3 million and $92.5 million of standby letters of credit secured by cash deposits or participated to others as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The weighted average maturity of standby letters of credit was 23 months at December 31, 2018 and 22 months at December 31, 2017.

Other Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments. As part of its securities custody activities and at the direction of its clients, Northern Trust lends securities owned by clients to borrowers who are reviewed and approved by the Northern Trust Capital Markets Credit Committee. In connection with these activities, Northern Trust has issued indemnifications to certain clients against certain losses that are a direct result of a borrower’s failure to return securities when due, should the value of such securities exceed the value of the collateral required to be posted. Borrowers are required to collateralize fully securities received with cash or marketable securities. As securities are loaned, collateral is maintained at a minimum of 100% of the fair value of the securities plus accrued interest. The collateral is revalued on a daily basis. The amount of securities loaned as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 subject to indemnification was $128.9 billion and $143.6 billion, respectively. Because of the credit quality of the borrowers and the requirement to fully collateralize securities borrowed, management believes that the exposure to credit loss from this activity is not significant and no liability was recorded related to these indemnifications.
Note 29 – Variable Interest Entities
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) are defined within GAAP as entities which either have a total(1) lack sufficient equity investment that is insufficientat risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or whose(2) have equity investors that lack attributes typical of an equity investor, such as the characteristicsability to make significant decisions through voting rights affecting the entity’s operations, or the obligation to absorb expected losses or the right to receive residual returns of a controlling financial interest.the entity, or (3) are structured with voting rights that are disproportionate to the equity investor’s obligation to absorb losses or right to receive returns, and substantially all of the activities are conducted on behalf of the holder of the equity investment at risk with disproportionately few voting rights. Investors that finance a VIE through debt or equity interests or other counterparties that provide other forms of support, such as guarantees, subordinated fee arrangements, or certain types of derivative contracts, are variable interest holders in the entity and the variable interest holder, if any, that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entityentity’s economic performance and, athrough its variable interest, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns that could potentially be significant to the entity is deemed to be the VIE’s primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate the VIE.


Leveraged Leases. In leveraged leasing transactions, Northern Trust acts as lessor of the underlying asset subject to the lease and typically funds 20-30%20 - 30% of the asset’s cost via an equity ownership in a trust with the remaining 70-80%70 - 80% provided by third party non-recourse debt holders. In such transactions, the trusts, which are VIEs, are created to provide the lessee use of the property with substantially all of the rights and obligations of ownership. The lessee’s maintenance and operation of the leased property has a direct effect on the fair value of the underlying property, and the lessee also has the ability to increase the benefits it can receive and limit the losses it can suffer by the manner in which it uses the property. As a result, Northern Trust has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the leveraged lease trust VIEs given it lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the leveraged lease trust VIEs.
Northern Trust’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with leveraged lease trust VIEs is limited to the carrying amounts of its leveraged lease investments. As of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the carrying amounts of these investments, which are included in loansLoans and leases inLeases on the consolidated balance sheets, were $56.8$11.4 million and $131.0$42.6 million, respectively. Northern Trust’s funding requirements relative to the leveraged lease trust VIEs are limited to its invested capital. Northern Trust has no0 other liquidity arrangements or obligations to purchase assets of the leveraged lease trust VIEs that would expose Northern Trust to a loss.


Tax Credit Structures. Northern Trust invests in qualified affordable housing projects and community development entities (collectively, community development projects) that are designed to generate a return primarily through the realization of tax credits. The community development projects are formed as limited partnerships and limited liability companies in which Northern Trust invests as a limited partner/investor member through equity contributions. The economic performance of the community development projects, some of which are VIEs, is subject to the performance of

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 157

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

their underlying investment and their ability to operate in compliance with the rules and regulations necessary for the
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 159

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
qualification of tax credits generated by equity investments. Northern Trust has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any community development project VIEs as it lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the underlying investments or to affect their ability to operate in compliance with the rules and regulations necessary for the qualification of tax credits generated by equity investments. This power is held by the general partners and managing members who exercise full and exclusive control of the operations of the community development project VIEs.
Northern Trust’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with community development projects is limited to the carrying amounts of its investments, including any undrawn commitments. As of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the carrying amounts of these investments in community development projects that generate tax credits, included in other assets inOther Assets on the consolidated balance sheets, totaled $602.4$919.6 million and $415.3$749.3 million, respectively, of which $549.8$874.0 million and $386.1$700.3 million are VIEs as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. As of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, liabilities related to unfunded commitments on investments in tax credit community development projects, included in other liabilities inOther Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, totaled $321.0$351.6 million and $241.1$376.2 million, respectively, of which $279.5$335.9 million and $215.2$354.3 million related to undrawn commitments on VIEs as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
Northern Trust’s funding requirements are limited to its invested capital and undrawn commitments for future equity contributions. Northern Trust has no0 exposure to loss from liquidity arrangements and no obligation to purchase assets of the community development projects.
Tax credits and other tax benefits attributable to community development projects totaled $63.0$78.9 million and $57.9$67.4 million, respectively, as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.


Investment Funds. Northern Trust acts as asset manager for various funds in which clients of Northern Trust are investors. As an asset manager of funds, Northern Trust earns a competitively priced fee that is based on assets managed and varies with each fund’s investment objective. Based on its analysis, Northern Trust has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs under GAAP.
Some of the funds for which Northern Trust acts as asset manager comply or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds and therefore the funds are exempt from the consolidation requirements in Accounting Standards CodificationASC 810-10. ForNorthern Trust voluntarily waived $36.4 million of money market mutual fund fees for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020 related to the low-interest-rate environment and certain competitive factors. Northern Trust did not waive any money market mutual fund fees. Forfees for the year ended December 31, 2017, Northern Trust voluntarily waived $1.0 million of money market mutual fund fees.2019. Northern Trust does not have any contractual obligations to provide financial support to the funds. Any potential future support of the funds will be at the discretion of Northern Trust after an evaluation of the specific facts and circumstances.
Periodically, Northern Trust makes seed capital investments to certain funds. As of December 31, 2018,2020, Northern Trust had $29.20 seed capital investments and 0 unfunded commitments related to seed capital investments. As of December 31, 2019, Northern Trust had $112.0 million of investments valued using net asset value per share and included in other assetsOther Assets and had no unfunded commitments related to seed capital investments. As of December 31, 2017, Northern Trust had $10.0 million of investments valued using net asset value per share and included in other assets and had no0 unfunded commitments related to seed capital investments.




160 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 30 – Pledged and Restricted Assets
Certain of Northern Trust’s subsidiaries, as required or permitted by law, pledge assets to secure public and trust deposits, repurchase agreements and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, as well as for other purposes, including support for securities settlement, primarily related to client activities, for potential Federal Reserve Bank discount window borrowings, and for derivative contracts. As of December 31, 2018, securities and loans totaling $39.6 billion ($30.9 billion of government-sponsored agency and other securities, $640.4 million of obligations of states and political subdivisions and $8.1 billion of loans) were pledged. This compares to $40.1 billion ($30.8 billion of government-sponsored agency and other securities, $684.3 million of obligations of states and political subdivisions and $8.6 billion of loans) at December 31, 2017.
The following table presents Northern Trust’s pledged assets.
TABLE 135: TYPE OF PLEDGED ASSETS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Billions)20202019
Securities
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions$2.9 $1.0 
Government Sponsored Agency and Other Securities32.5 33.4 
Loans12.1 7.7 
Total Pledged Assets$47.5 $42.1 
Collateral required for these purposes totaled $9.3$5.7 billion and $8.9$8.5 billion at December 31, 20182020 and December 31, 2017,2019, respectively. Included inThe following table presents the total pledged assets are available for sale debt securities with a total fair value of $151.5 million and $833.4 million, as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, which were pledged as collateral for agreements to repurchase securities sold transactions, and available for sale debt securities with a total fair value of $29.0 million and $39.9 million, as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, which werethat are included in pledged as collateral for derivative contracts. assets.
TABLE 136: FAIR VALUE OF AVAILABLE FOR SALE DEBT SECURITIES INCLUDED IN PLEDGED ASSETS
SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASEDERIVATIVE CONTRACTS
(In Millions)DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
Debt Securities
Available for Sale$33.0 $487.1 $27.1 $14.4 
The secured parties to these transactions have the right to repledge or sell the securities as it relates to $151.5$33.5 million and $833.4$487.2 million of the pledged collateral as of December 31, 20182020 and December 31, 2017,2019, respectively.

158   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Northern Trust accepts financial assets as collateral that it is and is not permitted by contract or custom, to repledge or sell securities accepted assell. The collateral is generally obtained under certain reverse repurchase agreements.agreements and derivative contracts. The totalfollowing table presents the fair value of securities accepted as collateral was $605.0 million as of December 31, 2018 and $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2017.
Northern Trust has the right to repledge or sell securities accepted as collateral under certain repurchase agreements. The fair value of these securities accepted as collateral was $426.2 million as of December 31, 2018 and $78.3 million as of December 31, 2017.collateral. There was no0 repledged or sold collateral as ofat December 31, 20182020 or December 31, 2017.2019.
Northern Trust has the right to repledge or sell securities accepted as collateral under derivative contracts. The total fair value of securities accepted as collateral was $15.3 million as of December 31, 2018. There were $4.6 million securities accepted as collateral under derivative contracts as of December 31, 2017.
TABLE 137: ACCEPTED COLLATERAL
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
Collateral that may be repledged or sold
Reverse repurchase agreements$1,179.8 $707.8 
Derivative contracts0.9 16.8 
Collateral that may not be repledged or sold
Reverse repurchase agreements500.0 
Deposits maintained to meet Federal Reserve Bank reserve requirements averaged $1.7$0.4 billion in 20182020 as compared to $3.1$1.5 billion in 2017.2019. As a result of the economic environment arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve reduced the reserve requirement to zero percent on March 26, 2020.
Note 31 – Restrictions on Subsidiary Dividends and Loans or Advances
Various federal and state statutory provisions limit the amount of dividends the Bank can pay to the Corporation without regulatory approval. Approval of the Federal Reserve Board is required for payment of any dividend by a state-chartered bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System if the total of all dividends declared by the bank in any calendar year would exceed the total of its retained net income (as defined by regulatory agencies) for that year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years. In addition, a state member bank may not pay a dividend in an amount greater than its “undivided profits,” as defined, without regulatory and stockholder approval.
Under Illinois law, an Illinois state bank, prior to paying a dividend, must carry over to surplus at least one-tenth of its net profits since the date of the declaration of the last preceding dividend, until the bank’s surplus is equal to its capital. In
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 161

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
addition, an Illinois state bank may not pay any dividend in an amount greater than its net profits then on hand, after deduction of losses and bad debts (defined as debts due to a state bank on which interest is past due and unpaid for a period of six months or more, unless the same are well secured and in the process of collection).
The Bank is also prohibited under federal law from paying any dividends if the Bank is undercapitalized or if the payment of the dividends would cause the Bank to become undercapitalized. In addition, the federal regulatory agencies are authorized to prohibit a bank or bank holding company from engaging in an unsafe or unsound banking practice. The payment of dividends could, depending on the financial condition of the Bank, be deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Basel III impose additional restrictions on the ability of banking institutions to pay dividends (e.g., the Corporation must include proposedmay pay dividends only in accordance with the capital plan that it submits torules and capital adequacy standards of the Federal Reserve Board and such dividends may only be declared if the Federal Reserve Board does not object to the Corporation’s capital plan)Reserve).
Under federal law, financial transactions by the Bank, the Corporation’s insured banking subsidiary, with the Corporation and its affiliates that are in the form of loans or extensions of credit, investments, guarantees, derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions or purchases of assets, are restricted. Transfers of this kindThese transactions must be on terms and conditions that are, or in good faith would be, offered to non-affiliated companies (i.e. on terms not less favorable to the Corporation or a nonbanking subsidiary by the Bank than market terms). Further, extensions of credit must be secured fully with qualifying collateral and are limited to 10% of the Bank’s capital and surplus for transactions with respect to anya single affiliate and to 20% of the Bank’s capital and surplus with all affiliates in the aggregate, and are also subject to certain collateral requirements (in the case of credit transactions) and other restrictions on covered transactions. These transactions, as well as other transactions between the Bank and the Corporation or its affiliates, also must be on terms substantially the same as, or at least as favorable as, those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated companies or, in the absence of comparable transactions, on terms, or under circumstances, including credit standards, that would be offered to, or would apply to, non-affiliated companies.affiliates. Other state and federal laws may limit the transfer of funds by the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries to the Corporation and certain of its affiliates.
Note 32 – Reporting Segments and Related Information
Segment Information. Northern Trust is organized around its two2 client-focused reporting segments: C&IS and Wealth Management. Asset management and related services are provided to C&IS and Wealth Management clients primarily by the Asset Management business. The revenue and expenses of Asset Management and certain other support functions are allocated fully to C&IS and Wealth Management. Income and expense associated with the Corporation’s and the Bank’s wholesale funding activities and investment portfolios, as well as certain corporate-based expense, executive level compensation and nonrecurring items are not allocated to C&IS and Wealth Management, and are reported in Northern Trust’s third reporting
Reporting segment Treasury and Other, in the tables below.
C&IS and Wealth Management results are presented to promote a greater understanding of their financial performance. The information, presented on an internal management-reporting basis, as opposed to GAAP which is used for consolidated

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 159

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

financial reporting purposes, derives from internaldetermined by accounting systems used to allocate revenue and expense to each segment, and incorporates processes for allocating assets, liabilities, equity and the applicable interest income and expense utilizing a funds transfer pricing (FTP) methodology. Under the methodology, assets and liabilities receive a funding charge or credit that support Northern Trust’s strategic objectivesconsiders interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and management structure.other product characteristics on an instrument level. Equity is allocated to the reporting segments based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, risk, regulatory considerations, and internal metrics. Allocations of capital and certain corporate expense may not be representative of levels that would be required if the segments were independent entities. The accounting policies used for management reporting are consistent with those described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Transfers of income and expense items are recorded at cost; there is no consolidated profit or loss on sales or transfers between reporting segments. Northern Trust’s presentations are not necessarily consistent with similar information for other financial institutions.
Effective January 1, 2019, Northern Trust implemented several enhancements to its FTP methodology, including the allocation of contingent liquidity charges to C&IS and Wealth Management client instruments and products. These methodology enhancements affect the results of each reporting segment. Due to the lack of historical information, segment results for periods ended prior to January 1, 2019 have not been revised to reflect the methodology enhancements.
Also effective January 1, 2019, revenues, expenses and average assets are allocated to C&IS and Wealth Management with the exception of non-recurring activities such as certain costs associated with acquisitions, divestitures, litigation, restructuring, and tax adjustments not directly attributable to a specific reporting segment.
For reporting periods ended prior to January 1, 2019, income and expense associated with the wholesale funding activities and investment portfolios of the Corporation and the Bank, as well as certain corporate-based expense, executive-level compensation and nonrecurring items, were not allocated to C&IS and Wealth Management, and were reported in Treasury and Other.
Reporting segment results are subject to reclassification when organizational changes are made. The results are also subject to refinements in revenue and expense allocation methodologies, which are typically reflected on a prospective basis.
The following tables showreflect the earnings contribution and average assets of Northern Trust’s reporting segments for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016.2018.

TABLE 121: CORPORATE AND INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Noninterest Income 
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$2,173.1
$1,984.6
$1,787.8
Foreign Exchange Trading Income233.4
197.9
224.4
Other Noninterest Income183.0
176.1
147.0
Net Interest Income (Note)992.2
733.8
565.0
    
Revenue (Note)3,581.7
3,092.4
2,724.2
Provision for Credit Losses1.9
3.4
1.9
Noninterest Expense2,421.4
2,194.5
2,012.2
    
Income before Income Taxes (Note)1,158.4
894.5
710.1
Provision for Income Taxes (Note)255.3
279.5
212.9
    
Net Income$903.1
$615.0
$497.2
    
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income58%51%48%
    
Average Assets$82,996.5
$80,105.6
$76,194.7

Note: Stated on an FTE basis.

TABLE 122: WEALTH MANAGEMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Noninterest Income 
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$1,580.6
$1,449.7
$1,320.3
Foreign Exchange Trading Income4.2
3.1
8.6
Other Noninterest Income102.7
103.9
105.7
Net Interest Income (Note)816.5
736.2
651.4
    
Revenue (Note)2,504.0
2,292.9
2,086.0
Provision for Credit Losses(16.4)(31.4)(27.9)
Noninterest Expense1,460.0
1,405.3
1,315.3
    
Income before Income Taxes (Note)1,060.4
919.0
798.6
Provision for Income Taxes (Note)262.1
347.2
301.1
    
Net Income$798.3
$571.8
$497.5
    
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income51%48%48%
    
Average Assets$26,163.7
$26,599.9
$26,525.0

Note: Stated on an FTE basis.






160   2018162 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE 138: CORPORATE & INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)202020192018
Noninterest Income
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$2,321.6 $2,211.5 $2,173.1 
Foreign Exchange Trading Income276.3 232.2 233.4 
Other Noninterest Income222.5 178.2 183.0 
Total Noninterest Income2,820.4 2,621.9 2,589.5 
Net Interest Income(1)
665.5 918.7 992.2 
Revenue(1)
3,485.9 3,540.6 3,581.7 
Provision for Credit Losses38.1 1.9 1.9 
Noninterest Expense2,752.7 2,605.5 2,421.4 
Income before Income Taxes(1)
695.1 933.2 1,158.4 
Provision for Income Taxes(1)
174.4 219.4 255.3 
Net Income$520.7 $713.8 $903.1 
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income43 %48 %58 %
Average Assets$104,790.6 $87,557.1 $82,996.5 
(1) Non-GAAP financial measures stated on an FTE basis.

TABLE 123:139: WEALTH MANAGEMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)202020192018
Noninterest Income
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$1,673.4 $1,640.6 $1,580.6 
Foreign Exchange Trading Income14.1 18.7 4.2 
Other Noninterest Income168.0 131.1 102.7 
Total Noninterest Income1,855.5 1,790.4 1,687.5 
Net Interest Income(1)
812.1 792.0 816.5 
Revenue(1)
2,667.6 2,582.4 2,504.0 
Provision for Credit Losses86.9 (16.4)(16.4)
Noninterest Expense1,559.7 1,531.6 1,460.0 
Income before Income Taxes(1)
1,021.0 1,067.2 1,060.4 
Provision for Income Taxes(1)
291.8 271.1 262.1 
Net Income$729.2 $796.1 $798.3 
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income60 %53 %51 %
Average Assets$32,020.5 $29,994.3 $26,163.7 
(1) Non-GAAP financial measures stated on an FTE basis.

TABLE 140: TREASURY AND OTHER RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
($ In Millions)202020192018
Noninterest Income$(18.3)$(17.1)$60.5 
Net Interest Income(1)
0 (144.8)
Revenue(1)
(18.3)(17.1)(84.3)
Noninterest Expense35.8 6.4 135.5 
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes(1)
(54.1)(23.5)(219.8)
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes(1)
(13.5)(5.8)(74.8)
Net Income$(40.6)$(17.7)$(145.0)
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income(3)%(1)%(9)%
Average Assets$0 $$13,786.4 
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Noninterest Income$60.5
$30.8
$133.1
Net Interest Income (Note)(144.8)5.0
43.6
    
Revenue (Note)(84.3)35.8
176.7
Noninterest Expense135.5
169.6
143.2
    
Income before Income Taxes (Note)(219.8)(133.8)33.5
Provision for Income Taxes (Note)(74.8)(146.0)(4.3)
    
Net Income$(145.0)$12.2
$37.8
    
Percentage of Consolidated Net Income(9)%1%4%
    
Average Assets$13,786.4
$12,901.9
$12,850.6

Note: Stated(1) Non-GAAP financial measures stated on an FTE basis.


TABLE 124:
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 163

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
STATEMENTS
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Noninterest Income   
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,753.7
$3,434.3
$3,108.1
Foreign Exchange Trading Income307.2
209.9
236.6
Other Noninterest Income276.6
301.9
382.2
Net Interest Income (Note)1,663.9
1,475.0
1,260.0
    
Revenue (Note)6,001.4
5,421.1
4,986.9
Provision for Credit Losses(14.5)(28.0)(26.0)
Noninterest Expense4,016.9
3,769.4
3,470.7
    
Income before Income Taxes (Note)1,999.0
1,679.7
1,542.2
Provision for Income Taxes (Note)442.6
480.7
509.7
    
Net Income$1,556.4
$1,199.0
$1,032.5
    
Average Assets$122,946.6
$119,607.4
$115,570.3
TABLE 141: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
Noninterest Income
Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$3,995.0 $3,852.1 $3,753.7 
Foreign Exchange Trading Income290.4 250.9 307.2 
Other Noninterest Income372.2 292.2 276.6 
Total Noninterest Income4,657.6 4,395.2 4,337.5 
Net Interest Income(1)
1,477.6 1,710.7 1,663.9 
Revenue(1)
6,135.2 6,105.9 6,001.4 
Provision for Credit Losses125.0 (14.5)(14.5)
Noninterest Expense4,348.2 4,143.5 4,016.9 
Income before Income Taxes(1)
1,662.0 1,976.9 1,999.0 
Provision for Income Taxes(1)
452.7 484.7 442.6 
Net Income$1,209.3 $1,492.2 $1,556.4 
Average Assets$136,811.1 $117,551.4 $122,946.6 
Note: Stated(1) Non-GAAP financial measures stated on an FTE basis. The consolidated figures include $41.2$34.4 million, $45.8$32.8 million, and $25.1$41.2 million, of FTE adjustments for 2020, 2019, and 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.


Further discussion of reporting segment results is provided within the “Reporting Segments and Related Information” section of Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Geographic Area Information. Northern Trust’s non-U.S. activities are primarily related to its asset servicing, asset management, foreign exchange, cash management, and commercial banking businesses. The operations of Northern Trust are managed on a reporting segment basis and include components of both U.S and non-U.S. source income and assets. Non-U.S. source income and assets are not separately identified in Northern Trust’s internal management reporting system. However, Northern Trust is required to disclose non-U.S. activities based on the domicile of the customer. Due to the complex and integrated nature of Northern Trust’s activities, it is difficult to segregate with precision revenues, expenses and assets between U.S. and non-U.S.-domiciled customers. Therefore, certain subjective estimates and assumptions have been made to allocate revenues, expenses and assets between U.S. and non-U.S. operations.
For purposes of this disclosure, all foreign exchange trading income has been allocated to non-U.S. operations. Interest expense is allocated to non-U.S. operations based on specifically matched or pooled funding. Allocations of indirect noninterest expenses, when made, are based on various methods such as time, space, and number of employees.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 161

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table below summarizes Northern Trust’s performance based on the allocation process described above without regard to guarantors or the location of collateral.


TABLE 125:142: DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL ASSETS AND OPERATING PERFORMANCE
(In Millions)TOTAL ASSETS
TOTAL
REVENUE(1)
INCOME BEFORE
INCOME TAXES
NET INCOME
2020
Non-U.S.$38,393.8 $1,737.6 $404.0 $302.6 
U.S.131,610.1 4,363.2 1,223.6 906.7 
Total$170,003.9 $6,100.8 $1,627.6 $1,209.3 
2019
Non-U.S.$27,888.6 $1,889.5 $600.0 $451.0 
U.S.108,939.8 4,183.6 1,344.1 1,041.2 
Total$136,828.4 $6,073.1 $1,944.1 $1,492.2 
2018
Non-U.S.$32,712.9 $2,018.1 $786.4 $625.7 
U.S.99,499.6 3,942.1 1,171.4 930.7 
Total$132,212.5 $5,960.2 $1,957.8 $1,556.4 
(In Millions)TOTAL ASSETS
TOTAL
REVENUE

INCOME BEFORE
INCOME TAXES

NET INCOME
2018    
Non-U.S.$32,712.9
$2,018.1
$786.4
$625.7
U.S.99,499.6
3,942.1
1,171.4
930.7
     
Total$132,212.5
$5,960.2
$1,957.8
$1,556.4
     
2017    
Non-U.S.$30,325.3
$1,709.7
$613.5
$430.0
U.S.108,265.2
3,665.6
1,020.4
769.0
     
Total$138,590.5
$5,375.3
$1,633.9
$1,199.0
     
2016    
Non-U.S.$24,944.0
$1,221.2
$284.3
$225.1
U.S.98,982.9
3,740.6
1,232.8
807.4
     
Total$123,926.9
$4,961.8
$1,517.1
$1,032.5

Note: (1) Total revenue is comprised of net interest income and noninterest income.



164 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 33 – Regulatory Capital Requirements
Northern Trust Corporation and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal bank regulatory authorities. Under these requirements, banks must maintain specific risk-based and leverage ratios in order to be classified as “well-capitalized.” The regulatory capital requirements impose certain restrictions upon banks that meet minimum capital requirements but are not “well-capitalized” and obligate the federal bank regulatory authorities to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to banks that do not maintain such minimum ratios. Such prompt corrective action could have a direct material effect on a bank’s financial statements.
As of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the Bank had capital ratios above the levels required for classification as a “well-capitalized” institution and had not received any regulatory notification of a lower classification. As a result of the stress test results published by the Federal Reserve on June 25, 2020, Northern Trust’s stress capital buffer requirement for the 2020 Capital Plan cycle was set at 2.5%. The 2020 stress capital buffer became effective October 1, 2020, and results in a common equity tier 1 capital ratio minimum requirement of 7.0%.
Additionally, Northern Trust’s subsidiary banks located outside the U.S. are subject to regulatory capital requirements in the jurisdictions in which they operate. As of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, Northern Trust’s non-U.S. banking subsidiaries had capital ratios above their specified minimum requirements. There were no conditions or events since December 31, 2018,2020, that management believes have adversely affected the capital categorization of any Northern Trust subsidiary bank.


162   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation165


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table below provides capital ratios for the Corporation and the Bank determined by Basel III phased in requirements.


TABLE 126:143: RISK-BASED AND LEVERAGE CAPITAL AMOUNTS AND RATIOS
DECEMBER 31, 2020DECEMBER 31, 2019
($ In Millions)STANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED APPROACHSTANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED
APPROACH
BALANCERATIOBALANCERATIOBALANCERATIOBALANCERATIO
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
Northern Trust Corporation$9,962.2 12.8 %$9,962.2 13.4 %$8,898.7 12.7 %$8,898.7 13.2 %
The Northern Trust Company10,003.3 13.0 10,003.3 13.8 8,476.0 12.3 8,476.0 13.0 
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:
Northern Trust CorporationN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
The Northern Trust Company4,994.4 6.5 4,717.1 6.5 4,472.0 6.5 4,230.0 6.5 
Tier 1 Capital
Northern Trust Corporation10,822.2 13.9 10,822.2 14.5 10,152.0 14.5 10,152.0 15.0 
The Northern Trust Company10,003.3 13.0 10,003.3 13.8 8,476.0 12.3 8,476.0 13.0 
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:
Northern Trust Corporation4,659.7 6.0 4,467.6 6.0 4,205.3 6.0 4,051.6 6.0 
The Northern Trust Company6,147.0 8.0 5,805.6 8.0 5,504.0 8.0 5,206.2 8.0 
Total Capital
Northern Trust Corporation12,085.7 15.6 11,825.8 15.9 11,456.7 16.3 11,332.3 16.8 
The Northern Trust Company11,123.1 14.5 10,863.3 15.0 9,610.4 14.0 9,486.0 14.6 
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:
Northern Trust Corporation7,766.2 10.0 7,446.0 10.0 7,008.8 10.0 6,752.7 10.0 
The Northern Trust Company7,683.7 10.0 7,257.0 10.0 6,880.1 10.0 6,507.7 10.0 
Tier 1 Leverage
Northern Trust Corporation10,822.2 7.6 10,822.2 7.6 10,152.0 8.7 10,152.0 8.7 
The Northern Trust Company10,003.3 7.0 10,003.3 7.0 8,476.0 7.3 8,476.0 7.3 
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:
Northern Trust CorporationN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
The Northern Trust Company7,105.0 5.0 7,105.0 5.0 5,835.4 5.0 5,835.4 5.0 
Supplementary Leverage(1)
Northern Trust CorporationN/AN/A10,822.2 8.6 N/AN/A10,152.0 7.6 
The Northern Trust CompanyN/AN/A10,003.3 7.7 N/AN/A8,476.0 6.4 
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:
Northern Trust CorporationN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
The Northern Trust CompanyN/AN/A3,883.4 3.0 N/AN/A3,983.6 3.0 
 December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
($ In Millions)ADVANCED APPROACHSTANDARDIZED APPROACHADVANCED APPROACHSTANDARDIZED APPROACH
 BALANCE
RATIO
BALANCE
RATIO
BALANCE
RATIO
BALANCE
RATIO
Common Equity Tier 1        
Northern Trust Corporation$8,729.8
13.7%$8,729.8
12.9%$8,626.3
13.5%$8,626.3
12.6%
The Northern Trust Company8,722.5
14.1
8,722.5
13.1
8,517.8
13.7
8,517.8
12.6
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:        
Northern Trust CorporationN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
The Northern Trust Company4,007.4
6.5
4,335.9
6.5
4,032.7
6.5
4,406.8
6.5
Tier 1        
Northern Trust Corporation9,596.7
15.0
9,596.7
14.1
9,473.4
14.8
9,473.4
13.8
The Northern Trust Company8,722.5
14.1
8,722.5
13.1
8,517.8
13.7
8,517.8
12.6
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:        
Northern Trust Corporation3,834.9
6.0
4,070.0
6.0
3,841.1
6.0
4,117.0
6.0
The Northern Trust Company4,932.2
8.0
5,336.4
8.0
4,963.3
8.0
5,423.8
8.0
Total        
Northern Trust Corporation10,803.8
16.9
10,942.0
16.1
10,707.4
16.7
10,861.2
15.8
The Northern Trust Company9,732.5
15.8
9,870.7
14.8
9,527.8
15.4
9,681.6
14.3
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:        
Northern Trust Corporation6,391.5
10.0
6,783.7
10.0
6,401.9
10.0
6,861.6
10.0
The Northern Trust Company6,165.3
10.0
6,670.6
10.0
6,204.2
10.0
6,779.7
10.0
Tier 1 Leverage        
Northern Trust Corporation9,596.7
8.0
9,596.7
8.0
9,473.4
7.8
9,473.4
7.8
The Northern Trust Company8,722.5
7.3
8,722.5
7.3
8,517.8
7.0
8,517.8
7.0
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:        
Northern Trust CorporationN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
The Northern Trust Company5,998.6
5.0
5,998.6
5.0
6,057.9
5.0
6,057.9
5.0
Supplementary Leverage (1)
        
Northern Trust Corporation9,596.7
7.0
N/A
N/A
9,473.4
6.8
N/A
N/A
The Northern Trust Company8,722.5
6.4
N/A
N/A
8,517.8
6.1
N/A
N/A
Minimum to qualify as well-capitalized:        
Northern Trust CorporationN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
The Northern Trust Company4,077.2
3.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
(1)In November 2019, the Federal Reserve and other U.S. federal banking agencies adopted a final rule that established a deduction for central bank deposits from the total leverage exposures of custodial banking organizations, including Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust Company, equal to the lesser of (i) the total amount of funds the custodial banking organization and its consolidated subsidiaries have on deposit at qualifying central banks and (ii) the total amount of client funds on deposit at the custodial banking organization that are linked to fiduciary or custodial and safekeeping accounts. The rule became effective on April 1, 2020.
(1) Effective JanuaryFurther, on April 1, 2018,2020, the Federal Reserve issued an interim final rule that requires bank holding companies, including Northern Trust Corporation, to deduct, on a minimumtemporary basis, deposits with the Federal Reserve and investments in U.S. Treasury securities from their total leverage exposure. The U.S. Treasury securities deduction is applied in addition to the central bank deposits relief referred to above. This rule became effective on April 1, 2020 and will remain in effect through the first quarter of 2021. On May 15, 2020, the U.S. federal banking agencies released an interim final rule that permits insured depository institutions of bank holding companies also to temporarily exclude deposits with the Federal Reserve and investments in U.S. Treasury securities from their total leverage exposure. The Northern Trust Company did not elect to take this deduction.
The supplementary leverage ratioratios at December 31, 2020 for the Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust Company reflect the impact of 3 percent became applicable.

these final rules.    
The risk-basedU.S. banking agencies’ capital guidelines that apply torules are based on the Corporation and the Bank, commonly referred to as Basel III are based upon the 2011 capital accord offramework. Under the Basel Committee. The Basel III framework, these rules are currently being phased in, and will come into full effect by January 1, 2022. Northern Trust Corporation’s remaining elements of the rules subject to the phase in requirements are not material to regulatory capital ratios.
Under the final Basel III rules, the Corporation and the Bank are required to calculate and publicly disclose risk-based capital ratios using two methodologies: an advanced approach and a standardized approach. Under the advanced approach, credit risk weighted assets (RWA) are based on internal credit models and parameters. Additionally, the advanced approach incorporates operational risk RWA. Under the standardized approach, RWA are based on supervisory prescribed risk weights that are primarily dependent on counterparty type and asset class.



166 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Pursuant to the Federal Reserve Board's implementation in the final Basel III rules of a provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, the capital adequacy of the Corporation and the Bank is assessed based on the lower of the advanced approach or standardized approach capital ratios.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 163

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The U.S.’s implementation of Basel III has increased the minimum capital thresholds for banking organizations and tightened the standards for what qualifies as capital. The Corporation and the Bank believe their capital strength, balance sheets and business models leave them well positioned for the continued U.S. implementation of Basel III.
Note 34 – Northern Trust Corporation (Corporation only)
Condensed financial information is presented below.in the following tables. Investments in wholly-owned subsidiaries are carried on the equity method of accounting.


TABLE 127:144: CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)20202019
ASSETS
Cash on Deposit with Subsidiary Bank$2,516.0 $2,559.1 
Advances to Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries – Banks2,670.0 2,370.0 
Investments in Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries – Banks10,799.9 9,349.8 
                                – Nonbank172.8 163.0 
Other Assets900.9 1,444.7 
Total Assets$17,059.6 $15,886.6 
LIABILITIES
Senior Notes$3,122.4 $2,573.0 
Long Term Debt1,189.3 1,148.1 
Floating Rate Capital Debt277.8 277.7 
Other Liabilities781.8 796.8 
Total Liabilities5,371.3 4,795.6 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock884.9 1,273.4 
Common Stock408.6 408.6 
Additional Paid-in Capital963.6 1,013.1 
Retained Earnings12,207.7 11,656.7 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)428.0 (194.7)
Treasury Stock(3,204.5)(3,066.1)
Total Stockholders’ Equity11,688.3 11,091.0 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$17,059.6 $15,886.6 
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
ASSETS  
Cash on Deposit with Subsidiary Bank$866.8
$1,002.5
Debt Securities
0.9
Advances to Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries – Banks2,910.0
2,460.0
                                     – Nonbank
13.5
Investments in Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries – Banks9,585.2
9,223.9
                                – Nonbank182.9
212.9
Other Assets803.1
706.4
Total Assets$14,348.0
$13,620.1
LIABILITIES  
Senior Notes$2,011.3
$1,497.3
Long Term Debt1,112.4
1,129.6
Floating Rate Capital Debt277.6
277.5
Other Liabilities438.5
499.5
Total Liabilities3,839.8
3,403.9
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
Preferred Stock882.0
882.0
Common Stock408.6
408.6
Additional Paid-in Capital1,068.4
1,047.2
Retained Earnings10,776.8
9,685.1
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(453.7)(414.3)
Treasury Stock(2,173.9)(1,392.4)
Total Stockholders’ Equity10,508.2
10,216.2
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$14,348.0
$13,620.1


164   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation167


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE 128:145: CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
OPERATING INCOME
Dividends – Bank Subsidiaries$900.0 $2,024.1 $1,200.9 
                 – Nonbank Subsidiaries0 0.4 
Intercompany Interest and Other Charges46.5 115.1 91.9 
Interest and Other Income19.1 20.2 (8.7)
Total Operating Income965.6 2,159.8 1,284.1 
OPERATING EXPENSES
Interest Expense104.2 121.6 97.3 
Other Operating Expenses26.2 28.6 17.0 
Total Operating Expenses130.4 150.2 114.3 
Income before Income Taxes and Equity in Undistributed Net Income of Subsidiaries835.2 2,009.6 1,169.8 
Benefit for Income Taxes28.2 24.3 24.6 
Income before Equity in Undistributed Net Income of Subsidiaries863.4 2,033.9 1,194.4 
Equity in Undistributed Net Income of Subsidiaries – Banks326.0 (559.9)336.7 
                                         – Nonbank19.9 18.2 25.3 
Net Income$1,209.3 $1,492.2 $1,556.4 
Preferred Stock Dividends56.2 46.4 46.4 
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock$1,153.1 $1,445.8 $1,510.0 
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
OPERATING INCOME   
Dividends – Bank Subsidiaries$1,200.9
$525.0
$300.0
                 – Nonbank Subsidiaries

3.4
Intercompany Interest and Other Charges91.9
58.2
39.8
Interest and Other Income(8.7)18.1
7.5
Total Operating Income1,284.1
601.3
350.7
OPERATING EXPENSES   
Interest Expense97.3
76.5
63.5
Other Operating Expenses17.0
25.9
19.9
Total Operating Expenses114.3
102.4
83.4
Income before Income Taxes and Equity in Undistributed Net Income of Subsidiaries1,169.8
498.9
267.3
Benefit for Income Taxes24.6
43.7
28.3
Income before Equity in Undistributed Net Income of Subsidiaries1,194.4
542.6
295.6
Equity in Undistributed Net Income of Subsidiaries – Banks336.7
632.6
708.3
                                         – Nonbank25.3
23.8
28.6
Net Income$1,556.4
$1,199.0
$1,032.5
Preferred Stock Dividends46.4
49.8
23.4
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock$1,510.0
$1,149.2
$1,009.1
TABLE 146: CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)202020192018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income$1,209.3 $1,492.2 $1,556.4 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Equity in Undistributed Net Income of Subsidiaries(345.9)541.7 (362.0)
Change in Prepaid Expenses398.5 (400.4)(0.6)
Change in Accrued Income Taxes3.7 114.1 (141.8)
Other Operating Activities, net300.3 141.9 125.6 
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities1,565.9 1,889.5 1,177.6 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from Sale, Maturity and Redemption of Debt Securities – Available for Sale0 1.0 
Investments in and Advances to Subsidiaries, net(800.0)540.0 (436.5)
Acquisition of a Business, Net of Cash Received0 (31.2)
Other Investing Activities, net1.8 3.7 (3.1)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities(798.2)543.7 (469.8)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from Senior Notes993.2 498.0 497.9 
Repayments of Senior Notes(508.6)
Redemption of Preferred Stock - Series C(400.0)
Proceeds from Issuance of Preferred Stock - Series E0 392.5 
Treasury Stock Purchased(299.8)(1,100.2)(924.3)
Net Proceeds from Stock Options19.5 44.0 32.6 
Cash Dividends Paid on Common Stock(584.6)(529.7)(405.4)
Cash Dividends Paid on Preferred Stock(45.9)(46.4)(46.4)
Other Financing Activities, net15.4 0.9 2.1 
Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Financing Activities(810.8)(740.9)(843.5)
Net Change in Cash on Deposit with Subsidiary Bank(43.1)1,692.3 (135.7)
Cash on Deposit with Subsidiary Bank at Beginning of Year2,559.1 866.8 1,002.5 
Cash on Deposit with Subsidiary Bank at End of Year$2,516.0 $2,559.1 $866.8 



2018168 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation165

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE 129: CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:   
Net Income$1,556.4
$1,199.0
$1,032.5
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:   
Equity in Undistributed Net Income of Subsidiaries(362.0)(656.4)(736.9)
Change in Prepaid Expenses(0.6)(0.3)3.0
Change in Accrued Income Taxes(141.8)17.2
(17.9)
Other, net125.6
55.7
55.7
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities1,177.6
615.2
336.4
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:   
Proceeds from Sale, Maturity and Redemption of Debt Securities – Available for Sale1.0

0.2
Change in Capital Investments in Subsidiaries

(3.0)
Advances to Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries(436.5)100.0
(295.0)
Acquisition of a Subsidiary, net of cash acquired(31.2)

Other, net(3.1)1.9
1.2
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(469.8)101.9
(296.6)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:   
Proceeds from Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt497.9
350.0

Proceeds from Issuance of Preferred Stock – Series D

493.5
Treasury Stock Purchased(924.3)(523.1)(411.1)
Net Proceeds from Stock Options32.6
108.0
233.8
Cash Dividends Paid on Common Stock(405.4)(356.8)(333.0)
Cash Dividends Paid on Preferred Stock(46.4)(49.8)(23.4)
Other, net2.1
0.1
(0.1)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities(843.5)(471.6)(40.3)
Net Change in Cash on Deposit with Subsidiary Bank(135.7)245.5
(0.5)
Cash on Deposit with Subsidiary Bank at Beginning of Year1,002.5
757.0
757.5
Cash on Deposit with Subsidiary Bank at End of Year$866.8
$1,002.5
$757.0

166   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM – SELECTED STATISTICAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL DATA
TABLE 130: QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
STATEMENTS OF INCOME20182017
($ In Millions Except Per Share Information)
FOURTH
QUARTER

THIRD
QUARTER

SECOND
QUARTER

FIRST
QUARTER

FOURTH
QUARTER

THIRD
QUARTER

SECOND
QUARTER

FIRST
QUARTER

Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees$933.9
$939.2
$942.9
$937.7
$910.0
$867.9
$848.2
$808.2
Other Noninterest Income152.7
126.9
149.9
154.3
134.5
123.1
131.5
122.7
Net Interest Income        
Interest Income648.6
599.2
567.7
505.9
488.1
453.8
417.2
410.3
Interest Expense231.4
191.0
154.4
121.9
108.1
99.6
75.7
56.8
Net Interest Income417.2
408.2
413.3
384.0
380.0
354.2
341.5
353.5
Provision for Credit Losses(4.0)(9.0)1.5
(3.0)(13.0)(7.0)(7.0)(1.0)
Noninterest Expense1,021.9
1,002.3
997.4
995.3
1,001.9
935.6
937.4
894.5
Provision for Income Taxes76.0
106.5
116.8
102.1
79.0
118.2
122.9
114.8
Net Income$409.9
$374.5
$390.4
$381.6
$356.6
$298.4
$267.9
$276.1
Preferred Stock Dividends5.9
17.3
5.9
17.3
5.9
17.3
5.9
20.7
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock$404.0
$357.2
$384.5
$364.3
$350.7
$281.1
$262.0
$255.4
PER COMMON SHARE        
Net Income – Basic$1.81
$1.59
$1.69
$1.59
$1.52
$1.21
$1.12
$1.10
    – Diluted1.80
1.58
1.68
1.58
1.51
1.20
1.12
1.09
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET ASSETS        
Cash and Due from Banks$2,400.9
$2,702.9
$2,440.5
$2,593.2
$2,838.8
$2,666.8
$2,701.1
$2,116.6
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits21,762.6
22,889.6
24,512.8
26,495.1
25,995.8
25,182.9
22,570.0
21,806.9
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(1)
5,228.9
5,410.3
6,556.9
6,920.4
7,084.7
7,145.8
7,653.9
6,684.3
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell1,334.3
1,775.2
1,417.1
1,467.1
1,389.8
1,945.8
2,059.4
2,011.7
Securities(2)
52,228.6
50,820.8
49,692.4
48,335.7
45,601.9
44,742.3
43,731.8
44,777.7
Loans and Leases31,623.8
31,798.9
32,235.4
32,468.0
33,235.6
33,468.2
33,891.4
33,671.2
Allowance for Credit Losses Assigned to Loans and Leases(120.3)(127.6)(126.4)(131.0)(149.1)(155.1)(162.3)(160.8)
Other Assets6,855.4
6,885.5
7,138.0
6,344.8
6,314.5
6,162.7
5,955.4
5,568.8
Total Assets$121,314.2
$122,155.6
$123,866.7
$124,493.3
$122,312.0
$121,159.4
$118,400.7
$116,476.4
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Deposits        
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing$19,211.2
$19,430.5
$21,484.7
$22,022.9
$21,385.5
$21,736.4
$23,518.1
$25,712.5
Savings, Money Market, and Other14,349.1
14,787.6
15,565.0
15,916.4
15,996.1
15,617.1
15,236.1
15,446.7
Savings Certificates and Other Time721.1
810.5
896.6
1,058.5
1,189.2
1,255.1
1,312.7
1,338.5
Non-U.S. Offices – Interest-Bearing58,873.9
58,473.2
57,684.5
59,199.7
58,632.0
58,503.4
56,672.3
52,435.9
Total Deposits93,155.3
93,501.8
95,630.8
98,197.5
97,202.8
97,112.0
96,739.2
94,933.6
Short-Term Borrowings10,987.9
11,380.7
11,336.2
9,405.3
8,411.9
7,264.5
5,412.0
5,659.1
Senior Notes1,996.5
1,818.0
1,497.6
1,497.4
1,497.2
1,497.0
1,496.9
1,496.7
Long-Term Debt1,099.6
1,254.4
1,410.8
1,426.5
1,540.1
1,672.5
1,536.1
1,324.9
Floating Rate Capital Debt277.6
277.6
277.5
277.5
277.5
277.5
277.4
277.4
Other Liabilities3,498.5
3,648.5
3,511.7
3,551.4
3,271.7
3,295.7
2,963.1
2,993.3
Stockholders’ Equity10,298.8
10,274.6
10,202.1
10,137.7
10,110.8
10,040.2
9,976.0
9,791.4
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$121,314.2
$122,155.6
$123,866.7
$124,493.3
$122,312.0
$121,159.4
$118,400.7
$116,476.4
ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME        
Earning Assets$112,178.2
$112,694.8
$114,414.6
$115,686.3
$113,307.8
$112,485.0
$109,906.5
$108,951.8
Interest-Related Funds88,305.7
88,802.0
88,668.2
88,781.4
87,544.0
86,087.1
81,943.5
77,979.2
Noninterest-Related Funds$23,872.5
$23,892.8
$25,746.4
$26,904.9
$25,763.8
$26,397.9
$27,963.0
$30,972.6
Net Interest Income (Fully Taxable Equivalent)430.1
418.5
422.6
392.7
396.0
366.2
350.4
362.4
Net Interest Margin (Fully Taxable Equivalent)1.52%1.47%1.48%1.38%1.39%1.29%1.28%1.35%

(1) Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks includes the interest-bearing component of Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks as presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Securities include Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock and certain community development investments which are classified in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017.

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 167



TABLE 131: AVERAGE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS WITH ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME (INTEREST AND RATE ON A FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)
 201820172016
($ In Millions)INTEREST
AVERAGE
BALANCE

RATE(4)

INTEREST
AVERAGE
BALANCE

RATE(4)

INTEREST
AVERAGE
BALANCE

RATE(4)

AVERAGE EARNING ASSETS         
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits$207.1
$23,899.3
0.87%$155.1
$23,903.9
0.65%$91.4
$20,434.4
0.45%
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with
Banks(1)
70.0
6,022.8
1.16
63.8
7,143.3
0.89
64.3
8,742.7
0.73
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell33.3
1,498.8
2.22
27.5
1,850.2
1.48
18.4
1,775.7
1.04
          
Securities         
U.S. Government108.3
5,737.1
1.89
89.4
6,342.5
1.41
78.1
7,073.1
1.10
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions13.9
725.2
1.91
13.1
887.3
1.48
11.3
585.8
1.94
Government Sponsored Agency456.0
20,682.7
2.20
283.2
17,987.0
1.57
177.2
17,421.0
1.02
Other(2)
367.5
23,136.5
1.59
253.3
19,498.9
1.30
189.9
16,961.4
1.12
          
Total Securities945.7
50,281.5
1.88
639.0
44,715.7
1.43
456.5
42,041.3
1.09
          
Loans and Leases(3)
1,106.5
32,028.6
3.45
929.8
33,565.2
2.77
811.4
34,043.5
2.38
          
Total Earning Assets2,362.6
113,731.0
2.08
1,815.2
111,178.3
1.63
1,442.0
107,037.6
1.35
          
Allowance for Credit Losses Assigned to Loans and Leases
(126.3)

(156.8)

(192.9)
Cash and Due from Banks
2,534.3


2,583.1


2,035.3

Buildings and Equipment
438.5


466.0


445.5

Client Security Settlement Receivables
1,002.0


891.6


1,136.6

Goodwill
642.5


544.0
 
524.9

Other Assets
4,724.6


4,101.2


4,583.3

          
Total Assets$
$122,946.6
%$
$119,607.4
%$
$115,570.3
%
          
AVERAGE SOURCE OF FUNDS        
Deposits        
Savings, Money Market, and Other$82.0
$15,149.3
0.54%$24.3
$15,575.6
0.16%$11.9
$15,142.4
0.08%
Savings Certificates and Other Time7.8
870.6
0.90
9.4
1,273.4
0.74
8.3
1,432.0
0.58
Non-U.S. Offices – Interest-Bearing294.8
58,556.6
0.50
148.4
56,583.2
0.26
63.3
50,808.2
0.12
          
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits384.6
74,576.5
0.52
182.1
73,432.2
0.25
83.5
67,382.6
0.12
Short-Term Borrowings208.2
10,783.5
1.93
67.1
6,696.0
1.00
21.8
6,337.0
0.34
Senior Notes53.4
1,704.0
3.13
46.9
1,496.9
3.13
46.8
1,496.6
3.13
Long-Term Debt45.0
1,296.8
3.47
39.2
1,519.4
2.58
26.4
1,392.4
1.90
Floating Rate Capital Debt7.5
277.6
2.72
4.9
277.5
1.75
3.5
277.4
1.25
          
Total Interest-Related Funds698.7
88,638.4
0.79
340.2
83,422.0
0.41
182.0
76,886.0
0.24
          
Interest Rate Spread

1.29


1.22


1.11
Demand and Other Noninterest-Bearing Deposits
20,526.6


23,072.6


26,231.3

Other Liabilities
3,552.7


3,132.2


3,367.7

Stockholders’ Equity
10,228.9


9,980.6


9,085.3

          
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$
$122,946.6
%$
$119,607.4
%$
$115,570.3
%
          
Net Interest Income/Margin (FTE Adjusted)$1,663.9
$
1.46%$1,475.0
$
1.33%$1,260.0
$
1.18%
          
Net Interest Income/Margin (Unadjusted)$1,622.7
$
1.43%$1,429.2
$
1.29%$1,234.9
$
1.15%
          
Net Interest Income/Margin Components (FTE Adjusted)         
U.S.$1,079.9
$88,717.0
1.22%$1,076.4
$90,090.3
1.19%$959.5
$88,514.4
1.08%
Non-U.S.584.0
25,014.0
2.33
398.6
21,088.0
1.89%300.5
18,523.2
1.62%
          
Consolidated$1,663.9
$113,731.0
1.46%$1,475.0
$111,178.3
1.33%$1,260.0
$107,037.6
1.18%

(1) Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks includes interest-bearing component of Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks as presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Other securities include Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock and certain community development investments for purposes of presenting earning assets; such securities are presented in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
(3) Average balances include nonaccrual loans. Lease financing receivable balances are reduced by deferred income.
(4) Rate calculations are based on actual balances rather than the rounded amounts presented in the Average Consolidated Balance Sheets with Analysis of Net Interest Income.
Notes:Net Interest Income (FTE Adjusted) includes adjustments to a fully taxable equivalent basis for loans and securities. Such adjustments are based on a blended federal and state tax rate of 24.9%. Total taxable equivalent interest adjustments amounted to $41.2 million in 2018, $45.8 million in 2017 and 25.1 million in 2016. Interest revenue on cash collateral positions is reported above within interest-bearing due from and deposits with banks and within loans and leases. Interest expense on cash collateral positions is reported above within non-U.S. offices interest-bearing deposits. Related cash collateral received from and deposited with derivative counterparties is recorded net of the associated derivative contract within other assets and other liabilities, respectively.

168   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




TABLE 132: CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME
(INTEREST AND RATE ON A FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)2018/2017 CHANGE DUE TO2017/2016 CHANGE DUE TO
(In Millions)AVERAGE
BALANCE

RATE
TOTAL
AVERAGE
BALANCE

RATE
TOTAL
Increase (Decrease) in Interest Income      
Money Market Assets      
Federal Reserve and Other Central Bank Deposits$
$52.0
$52.0
$17.6
$46.1
$63.7
Interest-Bearing Due from and Deposits with Banks(6.7)12.9
6.2
2.5
(3.0)(0.5)
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell(3.5)9.3
5.8
0.8
8.3
9.1
Securities  
  
U.S. Government(7.3)26.2
18.9
(6.5)17.8
11.3
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions(1.4)2.2
0.8
3.4
(1.6)1.8
Government Sponsored Agency47.0
125.8
172.8
6.1
99.9
106.0
Other52.0
62.2
114.2
30.6
32.8
63.4
Loans and Leases(20.5)197.2
176.7
20.5
97.9
118.4
       
Total$59.6
$487.8
$547.4
$75.0
$298.2
$373.2
       

      

      
Savings and Money Market$(0.7)$58.4
$57.7
$0.3
$12.1
$12.4
Savings Certificates and Other Time(4.8)3.2
(1.6)(0.7)1.8
1.1
Non-U.S. Offices Time5.3
141.1
146.4
7.5
77.6
85.1
Short-Term Borrowings55.9
85.2
141.1
1.3
44.0
45.3
Senior Notes6.5

6.5

0.1
0.1
Subordinated Notes  
  
Long-Term Debt(5.8)11.6
5.8
10.3
2.5
12.8
Floating Rate Capital Debt
2.6
2.6

1.4
1.4
       
Total$56.4
$302.1
$358.5
$18.7
$139.5
$158.2
       
Increase in Net Interest Income$3.2
$185.7
$188.9
$56.3
$158.7
$215.0

Note: Changes not due solely to average balance changes or rate changes are allocated proportionately to average balanceandrate based on their relative absolute magnitudes.


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 169



Investment Debt Securities Portfolio

TABLE 133: REMAINING MATURITY AND AVERAGE YIELD OF DEBT SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY AND AVAILABLE FOR SALE
 December 31, 2018
 ONE YEAR OR LESSONE TO FIVE YEARSFIVE TO TEN YEARSOVER TEN YEARSAVERAGE
MATURITY
($ in Millions)BOOK
YIELD
BOOK
YIELD
BOOK
YIELD
BOOK
YIELD
Debt Securities Held to Maturity         
U.S. Government$101.6
2.37%$
%$
%$
%2 mo.
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions9.3
5.11
9.6
4.85




14 mos.
Government Sponsored Agency0.9
4.66
2.1
4.81
1.1
4.74
0.4
4.68
52 mos.
Other – Fixed6,276.5
1.05
5,517.4
0.82
194.7
0.64
81.5
2.25
19 mos.
 – Floating249.9
1.85
1,536.9
1.84
372.1
0.34


48 mos.
          
Total Debt Securities Held to Maturity$6,638.2
1.11%$7,066.0
1.05%$567.9
0.45%$81.9
2.27%23 mos.
          
Debt Securities Available for Sale         
U.S. Government$1,287.1
1.46%$3,898.2
1.63%$
%$
%29 mos.
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions208.0
1.13
140.4
1.88
307.5
3.37


53 mos.
Government Sponsored Agency5,725.4
2.54
10,727.3
2.59
4,963.2
2.59
1,008.7
2.67
43 mos.
Asset-Backed – Fixed547.7
1.53
966.6
2.29
234.2
3.68
6.6
3.88
25 mos.
Asset-Backed – Floating319.2
3.10
1,097.1
3.32
49.4
1.70
24.1
1.78
45 mos.
Other – Fixed812.6
1.50
2,754.2
2.42
94.9
1.82


31 mos.
 – Floating262.8
2.67
1,360.1
2.91
91.6
2.74
1.9
2.94
30 mos.
          
Total Debt Securities Available for Sale$9,162.8
2.23%$20,943.9
2.43%$5,740.8
2.66%$1,041.3
2.66%39 mos.

Note: Yield is calculated on amortized cost and presented on a taxable equivalent basis giving effect to the applicable federal and state tax rates.

As of December 31, 2018, Northern Trust had no holdings of the securities of any single issuer greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity, except for U.S. government, government agencies, government corporations, government-sponsored agencies, and non-U.S. sovereign securities. See Note 4, “Securities,” to the consolidated financial statements provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for more information on securities.


170   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




Loans and Leases Portfolio

TABLE 134: REMAINING MATURITY OF SELECTED LOANS AND LEASES
 December 31, 2018
(In Millions)TOTAL
ONE YEAR
OR LESS

ONE TO FIVE
YEARS

OVER FIVE
YEARS

U.S. (Excluding Residential Real Estate and Private Client Loans):    
Commercial and Institutional$8,728.1
$5,229.7
$2,111.4
$1,387.0
Commercial Real Estate3,228.8
635.2
2,101.9
491.7
Lease Financing, net90.7
4.3
33.0
53.4
Other-Commercial426.0
255.2
103.1
67.7
Other-Personal67.5
2.6
4.1
60.8
     
Total U.S.$12,541.1
$6,127.0
$4,353.5
$2,060.6
     
Non-U.S.$2,701.6
$2,616.0
$47.7
$37.9
Total Selected Loans and Leases$15,242.7
$8,743.0
$4,401.2
$2,098.5
Interest Rate Sensitivity of Loans and Leases:    
Fixed Rate$8,909.2
$6,505.2
$1,344.1
$1,059.9
Variable Rate6,333.5
2,340.9
3,023.9
968.7
     
Total$15,242.7
$8,846.1
$4,368.0
$2,028.6

TABLE 135: DISTRIBUTION OF NON-U.S. LOANS BY TYPE
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Commercial$117.4
$289.5
$318.0
$335.2
$154.0
Non-U.S. Governments and Official Institutions




Banks

26.2
8.5

Other2,584.2
1,249.0
1,533.6
794.0
1,376.6
      
Total$2,701.6
$1,538.5
$1,877.8
$1,137.7
$1,530.6

Note: Non-U.S. loans primarily include short duration advances related to the processing of custodied client investments.

TABLE 136: ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES RELATING TO NON-U.S. OPERATIONS

The following table should be read in conjunction with the “Risk Management” section of Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Balance at Beginning of Year$
$
$
$3.3
$2.1
Charge-Offs




Recoveries




Provision for Credit Losses


(3.3)1.2
      
Balance at End of Year$
$
$
$
$3.3

The SEC requires the disclosure of the allowance for credit losses that is applicable to international operations. The above table has been prepared in compliance with this disclosure requirement and is used in determining non-U.S. operating performance. The amounts shown in the table should not be construed as being the only amounts that are available for non-U.S. loan charge-offs, since the entire allowance for credit losses assigned to loans and leases is available to absorb losses on both U.S. and non-U.S. loans. In addition, these amounts are not intended to be indicative of future charge-off trends.


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 171



Summary of Loans and Leases Loss Experience

TABLE 137: ANALYSIS OF ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The following table should be read in conjunction with the “Risk Management” section of Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
($ in Millions)2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Balance at Beginning of Year$153.8
$192.0
$233.3
$295.9
$307.9
Charge-Offs     
Commercial     
Commercial and Institutional0.1
10.3
15.8
9.2
5.4
Commercial Real Estate0.8
1.1
0.8
3.9
7.5
      
Total Commercial0.9
11.4
16.6
13.1
12.9
      
Personal     
Residential Real Estate7.3
8.0
10.4
16.7
21.2
Private Client1.9
2.1
0.3
0.9
2.0
      
Total Personal9.2
10.1
10.7
17.6
23.2
      
Total Charge-Offs10.1
21.5
27.3
30.7
36.1
      
Recoveries     
Commercial     
Commercial and Institutional1.5
3.7
3.3
1.7
1.3
Commercial Real Estate0.2
1.8
1.5
3.8
9.8
      
Total Commercial1.7
5.5
4.8
5.5
11.1
      
Personal     
Residential Real Estate6.7
5.4
6.6
4.5
5.6
Private Client0.6
0.4
0.7
1.2
1.4
      
Total Personal7.3
5.8
7.3
5.7
7.0
      
Total Recoveries9.0
11.3
12.1
11.2
18.1
      
Net Charge-Offs1.1
10.2
15.2
19.5
18.0
Provision for Credit Losses(14.5)(28.0)(26.0)(43.0)6.0
Effect of Foreign Exchange Rates

(0.1)(0.1)
Net Change in Allowance(15.6)(38.2)(41.3)(62.6)(12.0)
      
Balance at End of Year138.2
153.8
192.0
233.3
295.9
      
Allowance Assigned To:     
Loans and Leases$112.6
$131.2
$161.0
$193.8
$267.0
Undrawn Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit25.6
22.6
31.0
39.5
28.9
      
Total Allowance for Credit Losses$138.2
$153.8
$192.0
$233.3
$295.9
      
Loans and Leases at Year-End$32,490.0
$32,592.2
$33,822.1
$33,180.9
$31,640.2
Average Total Loans and Leases$32,028.6
$33,565.2
$34,043.5
$33,016.1
$30,215.6
As a Percent of Year-End Loans and Leases     
Net Loan Charge-Offs %0.03 %0.04 %0.06%0.06%
Provision for Credit Losses(0.04)(0.09)(0.08)(0.13)0.02
Allowance at Year-End Assigned to Loans and Leases0.35
0.40
0.48
0.58
0.84
As a Percent of Average Loans and Leases     
Net Loan Charge-Offs %0.03 %0.04 %0.06%0.06%
Allowance at Year-End Assigned to Loans and Leases0.35
0.39
0.47
0.59
0.88

172   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




Deposits

TABLE 138: AVERAGE DEPOSITS BY TYPE
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
U.S. Offices   
Demand and Noninterest-Bearing   
Individuals, Partnerships, Corporations, and Other$14,303.4
$16,412.0
$20,841.1
Correspondent Banks58.2
60.3
58.0
    
Total Demand and Noninterest-Bearing14,361.6
16,472.3
20,899.1
    
Interest-Bearing   
Savings, Money Market, and Other15,149.3
15,575.6
15,142.4
Savings Certificates less than $100,000109.3
130.1
150.9
Savings Certificates $100,000 and more434.2
717.3
672.0
Other327.1
426.0
609.1
    
Total Interest-Bearing16,019.9
16,849.0
16,574.4
    
Total U.S. Offices30,381.5
33,321.3
37,473.5
Non-U.S. Offices   
Noninterest-Bearing6,165.0
6,600.3
5,332.2
Interest-Bearing58,556.6
56,583.2
50,808.2
    
Total Non-U.S. Offices64,721.6
63,183.5
56,140.4
    
Total Deposits$95,103.1
$96,504.8
$93,613.9

TABLE 139: DISTRIBUTION OF NON-U.S. DEPOSITS BY TYPE
                        DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Commercial$69,899.2
$70,987.1
$57,354.0
Non-U.S. Governments and Official Institutions4,612.7
4,246.0
3,971.8
Banks161.9
305.5
276.6
Other Time
6.3
9.4
Other Demand14.3
6.1
8.8
    
Total$74,688.1
$75,551.0
$61,620.6

TABLE 140: REMAINING MATURITY OF TIME DEPOSITS $100,000 OR MORE
 DECEMBER 31, 2018
 U.S. OFFICESNON-U.S. OFFICES
(In Millions)
CERTIFICATES
OF DEPOSIT

OTHER
TIME

 
3 Months or Less$214.1
$
$16,786.3
Over 3 through 6 Months92.9

10.5
Over 6 through 12 Months153.2

8.5
Over 12 Months120.7


    
Total$580.9
$
$16,805.3


2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 173



TABLE 141: AVERAGE RATES PAID ON INTEREST-RELATED DEPOSITS BY TYPE
                       DECEMBER 31,
Interest-Related Deposits – U.S. Offices2018
2017
2016
Savings, Money Market, and Other0.54%0.16%0.08%
Savings Certificates less than $100,0000.17
0.15
0.15
Savings Certificates $100,000 and more0.76
0.46
0.35
Other Time1.80
1.38
0.94
Total U.S. Offices Interest-Related Deposits0.56
0.20
0.12
Total Non-U.S. Offices Interest-Related Deposits0.50
0.26
0.12
Total Interest-Related Deposits0.52
0.25
0.12

Non-U.S. Operations (Based on Obligor’s Domicile)

See also Note 32, “Reporting Segments and Related Information,” provided in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

TABLE 142: SELECTED AVERAGE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE TO NON-U.S. OPERATIONS
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Total Assets$30,781.3
$26,510.1
$24,031.0
$29,411.2
$28,072.8
Time Deposits with Banks3,943.2
5,013.4
6,331.3
13,712.9
16,106.9
Loans2,054.6
2,014.8
1,894.3
1,759.4
1,490.2
Non-U.S. Investments19,016.1
14,047.8
10,255.7
8,590.8
6,446.5
Total Liabilities66,008.5
64,267.3
57,270.0
54,521.0
52,123.3
Deposits64,721.6
63,183.5
56,139.8
52,981.2
49,854.7

TABLE 143: PERCENT OF NON-U.S.-RELATED AVERAGE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES TO TOTAL CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE ASSETS
 2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Assets25%22%21%27%27%
Liabilities54%54%50%49%50%

NON-U.S. OUTSTANDINGS
As used in this discussion and the following table, non-U.S. outstandings are cross-border outstandings as defined by the SEC. They consist of loans, securities, interest-bearing deposits with financial institutions, accrued interest and other monetary assets. Not included are letters of credit, loan commitments, and non-U.S. office local currency claims on residents. Non-U.S. outstandings related to a country are net of guarantees given by third parties resident outside the country and the value of tangible, liquid collateral realizable outside the country. However, transactions with branches of non-U.S. banks are included in these outstandings and are classified according to the country location of the non-U.S. bank’s head office.
Short-term interbank time deposits with non-U.S. banks represent the largest category of non-U.S. outstandings. Northern Trust actively participates in the interbank market with U.S. and non-U.S. banks.
Northern Trust places deposits with non-U.S. counterparties that have strong internal (Northern Trust) risk ratings and external credit ratings. These non-U.S. banks are approved and monitored by Northern Trust’s Capital Markets Credit Committee, which has credit authority for exposure to all non-U.S. banks and approves credit limits. This process includes financial analysis of the non-U.S. banks, use of an internal risk rating system and consideration of external market indicators. Each counterparty is reviewed at least annually and potentially more frequently based on credit fundamentals or general market conditions. Separate from the entity-specific review process, the average life to maturity of deposits with non-U.S. banks is deliberately maintained on a short-term basis in order to respond quickly to changing credit conditions. Northern Trust also utilizes certain risk mitigation tools and agreements that may reduce exposures through use of collateral and/or balance sheet netting. Additionally, the Capital Market Credit Committee oversees country-risk analyses and imposes limits to country exposure.


174   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




The following table provides information on non-U.S. outstandings by country that exceed 1.00% of Northern Trust’s assets.
TABLE 144: NON-U.S. OUTSTANDINGS
(In Millions)BANKS
COMMERCIAL
AND OTHER

TOTAL
AT DECEMBER 31, 2018  
Japan$391
$4,858
$5,249
Canada1,328
359
1,687
France1,470
468
1,938
    
AT DECEMBER 31, 2017  
Japan$510
$3,375
$3,885
Canada1,437
196
1,633
    
AT DECEMBER 31, 2016  
Japan$900
$1,608
$2,508
Canada2,114
309
2,423
France1,311
233
1,544
Sweden1,112
217
1,329
    

Countries whose aggregate outstandings totaled between 0.75% and 1.00% of total assets were as follows: Germany with aggregate outstandings of $1.2 billion and Australia with aggregate outstandings of $1.3 billion at December 31, 2018; Germany with aggregate outstandings of $1.3 billion and France with aggregate outstandings of $1.3 billion at December 31, 2017; Australia with aggregate outstandings of $1.2 billion and Germany with aggregate outstandings of $1.2 billion at December 31, 2016.

TABLE 145: PURCHASED FUNDS

Federal Funds Purchased
(Overnight Borrowings)
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Balance on December 31$2,594.2
$2,286.1
$204.8
Highest Month-End Balance4,395.8
2,286.1
378.5
Year – Average Balance2,762.8
1,102.6
617.7
  – Average Rate1.82%0.95%0.25%
Average Rate at Year-End2.25%1.17%0.07%

Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Balance on December 31$168.3
$834.0
$473.7
Highest Month-End Balance981.3
834.0
565.5
Year – Average Balance525.2
738.9
847.1
         – Average Rate1.48%0.81%0.27%
Average Rate at Year-End2.32%1.29%0.64%

Other Borrowings
(Includes Treasury Investment Program Balances, Term Federal Funds Purchased and Other Short-Term Borrowings)
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Balance on December 31$7,901.7
$6,051.1
$5,109.5
Highest Month-End Balance7,901.7
7,040.4
6,037.6
Year – Average Balance7,495.5
4,854.5
4,872.1
         – Average Rate2.00%1.04%0.37%
Average Rate at Year-End2.38%1.38%0.57%

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 175



Total Purchased Funds
                       DECEMBER 31,
(In Millions)2018
2017
2016
Balance on December 31$10,664.2
$9,171.2
$5,788.0
Year – Average Balance10,783.5
6,696.0
6,337.0
         – Average Rate1.93%1.00%0.34%





176   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Corporation’s management, with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of December 31, 2018,2020, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation of reliable published financial statements. This internal control includes monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies identified.
Management assessed the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2018,2020, the Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. Additionally, KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2018,2020, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2020.


Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.



20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 177169


REPORTOFINDEPENDENTREGISTEREDPUBLICACCOUNTINGFIRM
REPORTOFINDEPENDENTREGISTEREDPUBLICACCOUNTINGFIRM


TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Northern Trust CorporationCorporation’s and subsidiaries’ (the Corporation) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Corporation as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2018,2020, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 26, 201923, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Corporation in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


ntrs-20201231_g2.jpg


CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
FEBRUARY 26, 2019


23, 2021



178   2018170 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation






ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to “Supplemental Item – Information About Our Executive Officers of the Registrant”Officers” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as the following sections of the Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: “Item 1 – Election of Directors,” “Information about the Nominees for Director,” “Security Ownership by Directors and Executive Officers, – Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance – Code of Business Conduct and Ethics,” “Corporate Governance – Director Nominations and Qualifications and Proxy Access,” “Board and Board Committee Information – Audit Committee” and “Board and Board Committee Information – Committee Composition.Board Committees.
ITEM 11 – EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation and Benefits Committee Report,”“Executive “Executive Compensation,” and “Director Compensation” sections of the Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 12 – SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the “Security Ownership by Directors and Executive Officers,” “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners,” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” sections of the Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 13 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the “Board and Board Committee Information,” “Corporate Governance – Director Independence” and the “Corporate Governance – Related Person Transactions Policy” sections of the Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the “Audit Matters” section of the Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 179171





PART IV
ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15(a)(1) AND (2) – NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following financial statements of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are incorporated herein by reference.
For Northern Trust Corporation and Subsidiaries:
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 20182020 and 20172019
Consolidated Statements of Income - Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity - Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Financial statement schedules have been omitted for the reason that they are not required or are not applicable.


The Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) of the Corporation included in “Supplemental Item – Selected Statistical7, “Management's Discussion and SupplementalAnalysis of Financial Data”Condition and Results of Operations” is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 15(a)(3) – EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference to other filings.
ITEM 16 – FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.

Exhibit
Number
180   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 26, 2019
Northern Trust Corporation
(Registrant)
By:/s/    Michael G. O’Grady
Michael G. O’Grady
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
SignatureCapacity
/s/    Michael G. O'Grady
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Michael G. O’Grady
/s/    S. Biff Bowman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
S. Biff Bowman
/s/    Aileen B. Blake
Executive Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Aileen B. Blake
/s/    Linda Walker BynoeDirector
Linda Walker Bynoe
/s/    Susan CrownDirector
Susan Crown
/s/    Dean M. HarrisonDirector
Dean M. Harrison
/s/    Jay L. HendersonDirector
Jay L. Henderson
/s/ Marcy S. KlevornDirector
Marcy S. Klevorn
/s/ Siddharth N. (Bobby) MehtaDirector
Siddharth N. (Bobby) Mehta

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 181



/s/    Jose Luis PradoDirector
Jose Luis Prado
/s/    Thomas E. RichardsDirector
Thomas E. Richards
/s/    John W. RoweDirector
John W. Rowe
/s/    Martin P. SlarkDirector
Martin P. Slark
/s/    David H.B. Smith, Jr.Director
David H.B. Smith, Jr.
/s/    Donald ThompsonDirector
Donald Thompson
/s/    Charles A. Tribbett, IIIDirector
Charles A. Tribbett, III
Date: February 26, 2019

182   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




EXHIBIT INDEX
Description
Exhibit
Number
Description
4.3
4.4Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term debt of the Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, none of which authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, have not been filed as exhibits. The Corporation hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the SEC upon request.



172 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




Exhibit
Number
Description

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 183



Exhibit
Number
Description

184   20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation173


Table of Contents




Exhibit

Number
Description

2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 185



Exhibit
Number
Description



174 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




Exhibit
Number
Description

186   2018 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation




Exhibit
Number
Description
101Includes the following financial and related information from the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2020, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)(iXBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
104The cover page from this Annual Report on Form 10-K, formatted in Inline XBRL.

** Indicates a management contract or a compensatory plan or agreement.


ITEM 16 – FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
20182020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 187175




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 23, 2021
Northern Trust Corporation
(Registrant)
By:/s/    Michael G. O’Grady
Michael G. O’Grady
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
SignatureCapacity
/s/    Michael G. O'GradyChairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Michael G. O’Grady
/s/    Jason J. TylerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Jason J. Tyler
/s/    Lauren AllnuttExecutive Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Lauren Allnutt
/s/    Linda Walker BynoeDirector
Linda Walker Bynoe
/s/    Susan CrownDirector
Susan Crown
/s/    Dean M. HarrisonDirector
Dean M. Harrison
/s/    Jay L. HendersonDirector
Jay L. Henderson
/s/ Marcy S. KlevornDirector
Marcy S. Klevorn
/s/ Siddharth N. (Bobby) MehtaDirector
Siddharth N. (Bobby) Mehta
176 2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation





/s/    Jose Luis PradoDirector
Jose Luis Prado
/s/    Thomas E. RichardsDirector
Thomas E. Richards
/s/    Martin P. SlarkDirector
Martin P. Slark
/s/    David H.B. Smith, Jr.Director
David H.B. Smith, Jr.
/s/    Donald ThompsonDirector
Donald Thompson
/s/    Charles A. Tribbett, IIIDirector
Charles A. Tribbett, III
Date: February 23, 2021
2020 Annual Report | Northern Trust Corporation 177