Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YesX No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant: As of August 15, 2001,2002, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant (based upon the closing price for the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date) was approximately$101,122,912.145,243,259.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant's classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date.

Documents incorporated by Reference

(1) Sections of 20012002 Annual Report to Stockholders (Incorporated in Parts II and IV of this Report).

(2) Sections of Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after June 1, 2001.May 31, 2002. (Incorporated in Part III of this Report).

PART I

Item 1. Business.

BUSINESS AND PRODUCTS

Introduction and Background

Oxford Industries, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Georgia as Oxford Manufacturing Company, Inc. on April 27, 1960. In 1967, its name was changed to Oxford Industries, Inc. Its principal office is in Atlanta, Georgia.

The Company's primary business is the design, manufacture, marketing and sale of consumer apparel products in the popular to better price ranges. Substantially all of the Company's distribution facilities, offices and customers are located in the United States. Company-owned manufacturing facilities are located in Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America and Asia.

The Company is organized into four operating groups that reflect four major product lines. The operating groupsCompany's business segments are the Oxford Shirt Group, Lanier Clothes, Oxford Slacks, and the Oxford Womenswear Group. The Shirt Group operations encompass branded and private label dress and sport shirts golf and children'sbranded golf apparel. Lanier Clothes produces branded and private label suits, sportcoats,sports coats, suit separates and dress slacks. Oxford Slacks is a producer of private label dress and casual slacks and walk shorts. The Oxford Womenswear Group is a producer of budget and moderate priced private label women's apparel.sportswear. Corporate and otherOther is a reconciling category for reporting purposes and includes the Company's corporate offices, transportation and logistics and other costs and services that are not allocated to the other operating groups.

DISTRIBUTION

The Company's customers include national and regional chain stores, mail order and catalog firms, discount stores, department stores and chain and independent specialty stores.

Several product lines are designed and manufactured in anticipation of orders for sale to department and specialty stores and certain specialty chain and mail order customers. The Company must make commitments for fabric and production in connection with these lines. In the case of imports, these commitments can be up to several months prior to the receipt of firm orders from customers. These lines include both popular and better price merchandise sold under brand and designer names or customers' private labels.

The Company works closely with many customers to develop large volume product programs prior to commencement of production, enabling the Company to take advantage of relative efficiencies in planning, raw materials purchasing and utilization of production facilities. Products sold under these programs are in the popular price range and usually carry the customers' trademarks, although the Company offers some branded and designer programs for this customer market.

The Company employs a sales force consisting of salaried and commissioned sales employees and independent commissioned sales representatives. Apparel sales offices and showrooms are maintained by the Company in Atlanta, New York, Hong Kong, Chicago and Dallas. Other showrooms are maintained by independent commissioned sales representatives. A majority of the Company's business is conducted by direct contacts between the Company's salaried executives and buyers and other executives of the Company's customers.

MANUFACTURING, RAW MATERIALS AND SOURCES OF SUPPLY

Manufacturing and Raw Materials

Apparel products are manufactured from cotton, linen, wool, silk, other natural fibers, synthetics and blends of these materials. Materials used by the Company in its manufacturing operations are purchased from numerous domestic and foreign textile mills and converters in the form of woven or knitted finished fabrics. Buttons, zippers, thread and other trim items are purchased from both domestic and foreign suppliers. The Company's manufacturing facilities or contractors perform cutting, sewing and related operations to produce finished apparel products from these materials. Atto the end of the 2001Company's specifications and quality standards. In fiscal year domestic production for the Company accounted for2002, approximately 9%95% of the Company's business, of which approximately 1% came from the Company's United States manufacturing facilities,products were produced offshore and approximately 8% came from United States5% by domestic contractors.

The Company also purchases fabricCompany's owned manufacturing facilities are in Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, Honduras, and places it with domestic and foreign independent contractors for production of goods conforming to the Company's patterns, specifications and quality standards.Philippines.

The Company imports finished apparel products meeting its quality standards from suppliers in the Caribbean, Central America, the Far East and other areas. Imported goods are generally manufactured according to designs and specifications furnished or approved in advance of production by the Company. In order to place orders and monitor production, the Company maintains buying offices in Hong Kong and Singapore. The Company also retains unaffiliated buying agents in several other countries.

The Company manufactures in its own facilities in Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, Honduras, and the Philippines.

Sources of Supply

The Company regards its domestic and foreign sources of raw materials, finished goods and outside production as adequate and is not dependent on any single source or contractor. No single supplier or contractor accounts for a material portion of the Company's purchases or business. Alternative competitive sources are available, and the Company does not anticipate significant difficulty in meeting its supply and outside production requirements. There are occasions, however, where the Company is unable to take customer orders on short notice because of the minimum lead time required to produce a garment that is acceptable to the customer in regards to cost, quantity, quality and service.

The Company's import business could be adversely affected by currency exchange fluctuations, changes in United States import duties and trade restraints, political unrest in exporting countries, weather and natural disasters and other factors normally associated with imports.international business. The Company believes it has diminished potential risks in its import business by placing import programs with suppliersproducing in many different countries.

TRADEMARKS, LICENSES AND PATENTS

Trademarks

Principal menswear trademarks owned by the Company and Subsidiaries are "Lanier Clothes" and "Holbrook" for men's suits and sportcoats, "Oxford Shirtings" and "Holbrook"for men's shirts, "Travelers Worsted" for mens suits, "Everpress" for men's slacks; "928" for young men's suited separates, and "Ely Cattleman", "Cumberland Outfitters", "Ely Plains", "Ely Casuals", and "Plains" for men's western wear.

Although the Company is not dependent on any single trademark, it believes its trademarks in the aggregate are of significant value to its business.

The Company actively pursues the acquisition of significant brands and related businesses.

Licenses

The Company also has the right to use trademarks under license and design agreements with the trademarks' owners. Principal menswear trademarks the Company has the right to use are "Robert Stock" for men's suits, sport coats and dress slacks; "Oscar de la Renta" for men's suits, sport coats,sportcoats, vests, and dress and casual slacks; "Tommy Hilfiger" for men's dress shirts and men's and women's golf apparel; "Nautica" for men's tailored suits, sport coatssportcoats and dress slacks; "Geoffrey Beene" for men's tailored suits, sport coats, vests and dress slacks; "Slates" and "Dockers" for men's sportcoats and soft suitings; and "Izod Club" for men's, women's and junior's golf apparel and "DKNY" for newborns, toddlers, girl's and boy's apparel. Oxford Industries, Inc. and Donna Karan International have mutually agreed to terminate the DKNY Kids license on December 31, 2001. The license will be consolidated with Donna Karan International's European license holder for children's wear. O xford will continue to service the business until the termination date.

The above mentioned license and design agreements will expire at various dates through the Company's fiscal 20042007 year. Many of the Company's licensing agreements are eligible for renewal to extend the licenses through various dates from the Company's fiscal 20022003 through 2014 years.

Although the Company is not dependent on any single license and design agreement, it believes its license and design agreements in the aggregate are of significant value to its business.

Patents

The Company owns several patents covering apparel manufacturing processes and devices, but competitive processes and devices are available to others, and these are not material to the Company's business.

SEASONAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS AND ORDER BACKLOG

Seasonal Aspects of Business

The Company's business is generally divided among four retail selling seasons: Spring, Summer, Fall and Holiday. Seasonal factors can cause some variance in production and sales levels among fiscal quarters in any fiscal year, but the Company does not regard its overall business as highly seasonal.

Order Backlog

As of May 31, 2002 and June 1, 2001, and June 2, 2000, the Company had booked orders amounting to approximately $142,694,000$118,195,000 and $154,708,000,$142,694,000, respectively, all of which will be or were shipped within six months after each such date. These numbers represent only store orders on hand and do not include private-label contract balances. A growing percentage of the Company's business consists of at-once EDI "Quick response" programs with large retailers. Replenishment shipments under these programs generally possess such an abbreviated order life as to exclude them from the order backlog completely. The Company therefore does not believe that this backlog information is indicative of sales to be expected for the following year.

WORKING CAPITAL

The Company supplements operating cash with itsa $65,000,000 trade receivables securitization program and uncommitted bank lines of credit. On May 31, 2002, there were no borrowings under the securitization program. In addition, the Company has $219,500,000 in uncommitted lines of credit, of which $118,500,000 is reserved exclusively for letters of credit. The Company pays no commitment fees for these available lines of credit. At May 31, 2002 there were no borrowings under these lines. The Company anticipates use and availability of uncommitted resources as working capital needs may require

On June 1, 2001, the Company supplemented operating cash with a $90,000,000 trade receivables securitization program and committed and uncommitted bank lines of credit. On June 1, 2001, $56,000,000 of accounts receivable had been sold and waswere outstanding under the securitization program. On June 1, 2001, the Company had available for its use a committed line of credit aggregating $5,000,000. The Company has agreed to pay committedpaid commitment fees for this available line of credit. At June 1, 2001, there were no borrowings under this line. In addition, the Company hashad $184,500,000 in uncommitted lines of credit, of which $123,500,000 iswas reserved exclusively for letters of credit. The Company pays no commitment fees for these available lines of credit. At June 1, 2001 there were no borrowings under these lines. The Company anticipates use and availability of both committed and uncommitted resources as working capital needs may require

At the end of fiscal 2000 the Company had available for its use committed lines of credit with several lenders aggregating $52,000,000 at June 2, 2000. These lines of credit are used by the Company to cover fluctuations in working capital needs. The Company had $52,000,000 outstanding under these lines of credit at the end of fiscal 2000, of which $40,000,000 was long-term. In addition, at the end of fiscal 2000, the Company had $231,500,000 in uncommitted lines of credit, of which $143,500,000 was reserved for the issuance of letters of credit. At June 2, 2000, $6,500,000 was outstanding under these lines of credit. The Company had cash of $10,185,000 and $8,625,000 at the end of the 2001 and 2000 fiscal years. The weighted average interest rate on all short-term borrowings for the 2001 fiscal year was 6.2%.

Inventory levels are affected by order backlog and anticipated sales. It is the general practice of the Company to offer payment terms of net 30 to the majority of its customers, from date of shipment.

The Company believes that its working capital requirements and financing resources are comparable with those of other major, financially sound apparel manufacturers.

MAJOR CUSTOMERS

The Company's ten largest customers accounted for approximately 73%72% of the Company's net sales in fiscal 20012002 and approximately 74%73% in fiscal 2000.2001. Target accounted for 19% and 14% in the 2002 and 2001 fiscal years respectively. Wal-Mart accounted for 15%13% and 15% in the 20012002 and 2000 fiscal years, respectively. Target accounted for 14% and 12% in the 2001 and 2000 fiscal years, respectively. Lands' End, Inc. accounted for 11%10% and 11% of net sales in the 20012002 and 2000 fiscal years, respectively. JCPenney Company, Inc. accounted for 9% and 10% of net sales in the 2001 and 2000 fiscal years, respectively. The Company believes that its relationships with all of its major customers, including Wal-Mart, Target and Lands' End, Inc. and JCPenny Company are excellent.

COMPETITION

The Company's products are sold in a highly competitive domestic market in which numerous U. S. based and foreign manufacturers compete. No single manufacturer or small group of manufacturers dominates the apparel industry. The Company believes it is a major apparel manufacturing and marketing company, but there are other apparel firms with greater sales and financial resources.

Competition within the apparel industry is based upon styling, marketing, price, quality, customer service and, with respect to branded and designer product lines, consumer recognition and preference. The Company believes it competes effectively with other members of the industry with regard to all of these factors. Successful competition in styling and marketing is related to the Company's ability to foresee changes and trends in fashion and consumer preference and to present appealing product programs to its customers. Successful competition in price, quality and customer service is related to its ability to maintain efficiency in production, sourcing and distribution.

Substantially all of the apparel sold by the Company and its principal competitors is produced outside the United States. Most of the apparel sold by the Company and some of its competitors is sold to its customers on a landed, duty-paid basis after it is imported into the U.S. Other of the Company's competitors sell apparel to their customers, many of whom are also customers of the Company, on a direct basis in which the customer takes ownership in the country of production. In this direct sourcing scenario the customer handles the inbound logistics and customs clearance. Direct sourcing presents a competitive challenge to the Company. The Company is unable to quantify the effect of this trend on its sales and profits but believes that direct sourcing adversely affects both. The Company believes that the relative price advantage to retailers of direct sourcing is offset to an extent by the Company's ownership of, joint venture participation in or long term relationships with foreign facilities and by services provided to its customers such as delivery flexibility, manufacturing expertise, product development and design and supply chain management including the new supply chain management technology and information systems that the Company is implementing. In addition, in recent years the Company has successfully transitioned some of its business to a direct sale basis under which the Company's customers purchase directly from certain of the Company's foreign subsidiaries.

Critical to the Company's competitiveness is choosing the most competitive countries for the production of its products. Which country is theThe most competitive to producelocation for a particular product depends on a variety of factors. These factors include availability of globally competitive fabric and other raw materials, labor and manufacturing costs, ability to meet quality standards, required lead times, logistics and the impact of international trade rules and trade preference agreements and legislation on apparel exports from that country to the United States.

Trade preference agreements and legislation are important because most apparel imports into the United States are highly restricted. There are two key types of restrictions. First, the duty rates on the product categories that cover the majority of the Company's products range from 15-20%. Second, the United States has implemented restrictive quotas on the importation of many classifications of textiles and textile products from most of the major apparel producing countries including most of the countries where the Company produces apparel. Through December of 1994, these restraints were permittedcontrolled pursuant to the Multi-Fiber arrangement (MFA), an international textile trade agreement to which the United States was a party. During the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade, the United States and other countries negotiated a successor agreement to the MFA known as the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC). The ATC, which became effective on January 1, 1995.

The ATC requires that importing countries gradually phase out approximately half of the restrictive quotas on the importation of textiles and apparel products that were in place on December 31, 1994 over a ten year period. The remaining quotas are to be eliminated on January 1, 2005. However, the ATC allows importing countries such as the United States significant discretion in determining when during the ten year period quotas on particular products from particular countries will be eliminated. The United States has announced a plan that will keep quotas on most of the products produced by the Company for the entire ten-year period. In addition, the ATC permits importing countries, under certain conditions, to impose new quotas on the importation of textile and apparel products during the ten-year phase out period. Thus, the Company believes the extent to which the ATC will liberalize trade in textile and apparel products over the next fourtwo to three years is unclear.not material. Reduced restrictions on theth e importation of textiles and textile products could negatively affect the competitiveness of the Company's manufacturing and sourcing activities in some countries, but could also positively affect its manufacturing and sourcing activities in other countries. The Company believes that when the ATC is fully implemented on January 1, 2005, the competitiveness of many countries as apparel sourcing locations will change significantly.

Currently, there are various trade preference agreements and trade preference legislation that provide apparel importers including the Company with relief from duty and quota. These include, but are not limited to, the United States-Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act, the African Growth and Opportunity Act, the North American Free Trade Agreement, and the Israel Free Trade Agreement.Agreement and the recently renewed and enhanced Andean Trade Preference Act. Future trade agreements and legislation that may affect the Company's manufacturing and sourcing agreements include but are not limited to, the renewal and possible expansion of the Andean Trade Preference Act and the proposed Free Trade of the Americas Agreement. The Company believes that it is effective in using various trade preference agreements and legislation to its competitive advantage.

EMPLOYEES

As of June 1, 2001,May 31, 2002, the Company employed 9,4697,427 persons, approximately 82% of whomwhich 1,613 were employed in the Untied States. Approximately 80% of the Company's employees were hourly and incentive paid production workers. The Company believes its employee relations are excellent.

Item 2. Properties.

At June 1, 2001May 31, 2002 the Company operated a total of 1311 production plants all of which are located in foreign countries. Four plantsbuildings are owned and nineseven are leased. The plants are located in Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, Honduras, and the Philippines.

The Company also maintains separate warehousing and distribution facilities in Arizona, Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee and South Carolina.

Certain of the manufacturing, warehousing and distribution facilities deemed owned by the Company are held pursuant to long-term capital leases or lease purchase agreements, some of which have been entered into by the Company in connection with industrial revenue bond financing arrangements. Under this type of financing, the facilities are subject to trust indentures or security agreements securing the interests of the bondholders. See Notes E and F in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements forming a part of the financial statements included under Item 8 of this Report.

General corporate offices are maintainedlocated in a facility owned by the Company in Atlanta, Georgia. The Company leases sales, purchasing and administrative offices in Atlanta,Chicago, Wahalla South Carolina, New York, Dallas, London England, Hong Kong, New York and Singapore.

The Company owns substantially all of its machinery and equipment. Current facilities are adequately covered by insurance, generally well maintained and provide adequate production capacity for current and anticipated future operations.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Not applicable.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant.

Messrs. J. Hicks Lanier, Ben B. Blount, Jr. and Knowlton J. O'Reilly are also directors of the Company. The Board of Directors of the Company elects executive officers annually.

Mr. J. Hicks Lanier has served as President of the Company since 1977. In 1981 he was elected as Chairman of the Board.

Mr. Ben B. Blount, Jr. was Executive Vice President -- Planning and Development from 1986 - 1995. Mr. Blount was President of Kayser Roth Apparel, an apparel manufacturer and marketer, from 1982 to 1986. Prior to 1982 he was Group Vice President of the Company. In 1995 he was elected to serve in his present position as Executive Vice President of Finance, Planning and Administration and Chief Financial Officer.

Mr. Knowlton J. O'Reilly has served as Group Vice President of the Company since 1978.1978

Messrs. L. Wayne Brantley and R. Larry Johnson have served as Group Vice Presidents of the Company since 1997.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Incorporated by reference to the table presented in Note N under the heading "Common Stock Information" on page 3234 of the Company's 20012002 Annual Report to Stockholders (Exhibit 13 hereto). On August 15, 2001,2002, there were 601557 holders of record of the Company's common stock.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Incorporated by reference to page 18 of the Company's 20012002 Annual Report to Stockholders (Exhibit 13 hereto).

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Incorporated by reference to page 19 through 2219through 24 of the Company's 20012002 Annual Report to Stockholders (Exhibit 13 hereto).

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Information appearing under the caption "Market Risk Sensitivity" and "Future Liquidity and Capital Resources" on pages 22 through 23 of the Company's 2002 Annual Report to Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference (See Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations").

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

FinancialThe report of independent auditors and consolidated financial statements, including selected quarterly financial data, are incorporated by reference toincluded on pages 2325 through 3236 of the Company's 2001 Annual Report to Stockholders (Exhibit 13 hereto).for the year ended May 31, 2002 are incorporated herein by reference. Quarterly Results of Operations on page 34 of the Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended May 31, 2002 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Effective May 22, 2002, the Company appointed Ernst & Young LLP ("Ernst & Young") as its independent public accountants for the fiscal years ending May 31, 2002 and May 30, 2003. The decision to replace Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") as Oxford's independent public accountants was approved by Oxford's Board of Directors upon the recommendation of its Audit Committee.

During Oxford's two most recent fiscal years and through the date of the Form 8-K filed on May 22, 2002, there were no disagreements between Oxford and Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to Andersen's satisfaction would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with their reports.

None of the reportable events described under Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K occurred within Oxford's two most recent fiscal years or through the date of the Form 8-K filed on May 22, 2002.

The audit reports of Andersen on the consolidated financial statements of Oxford and subsidiaries as of and for the two most recent fiscal years did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. A letter from Andersen is attached as Exhibit 16.1.

During Oxford's two most recent fiscal years and through the date of the Form 8-K filed on May 22, 2002, Oxford did not consult Ernst & Young with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Oxford's consolidated financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events listed in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

Information required by this item covering directors of the Company is incorporated by reference to the information presented under the heading "Election of Directors - Directors and Nominees" in the Company's Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after June 1, 2001.May 31, 2002. Information required by this item covering executive officers of the Company is set forth under Item 4A of this Report.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Incorporated by reference to the information presented under the heading "Executive Compensation and Other Information" in the Company's Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after June 1, 2001.May 31, 2002.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

Incorporated by reference to the information presented under the heading "Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock" in the Company's Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after June 1, 2001.May 31, 2002.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Incorporated by reference to the information presented under the heading "Executive Compensation and Other Information - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in the Company's Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after June 1, 2001.May 31, 2002.

PART IV

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a) 1. Financial Statements

2. Financial Statement Schedules

Included herein:

ReportThe following consolidated financial statement schedule of Independent Public Accountants on Financial Statement Schedule.Oxford Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries is included in Item 14(d):

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.Accounts

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

3. Exhibits

The Company agrees to file upon request of the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of all agreements evidencing long-term debt of the Company and its subsidiaries omitted from this report pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K.

Shareholders may obtain copies of Exhibits without charge upon written request to the Corporate Secretary, Oxford Industries, Inc., 222 Piedmont Avenue, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30308.

(b) No reports onThe registrant filed a Form 8-K were filed during the last quarter of the period covered by this report.on May 22, 2002, for Item 4. Changes to Registrant's Certifying Accountants

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Oxford Industries, Inc.

/s/J. Hicks Lanier

J. Hicks Lanier

Chairman and President

Date:August 29, 200128, 2002

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

*by power of attorney

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC AUDITORS

ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Oxford Industries, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Oxford Industries, Inc. as of May 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, listed in the Index at Item 14(a)(1). Our audit also included the financial statement schedule for the year ended May 31 2002, listed in the Index at Item 14(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Oxford Industries, Inc. at May 31, 2002, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule for the year ended May 31, 2002, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note A, the Company changed its method of calculating LIFO inventories in the year ended May 31, 2002.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia

July 12, 2002

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

To Oxford Industries, Inc.:

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements included in Oxford Industries, Inc.'s 2001 Annual Report to Stockholders incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon, dated July 13, 2001. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in Item 14(a)2 is the responsibility of the Company's management and is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

July 13, 2001

OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS