FORM 10-KUNITED STATES

United States Securities and Exchange CommissionSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549



(Mark One)FORM 10-K





 

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.



For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.





 

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from-to-

For the transition period from-to-.



Commission File No. 1-6314



Tutor Perini Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





 

 

Massachusetts

 

04-1717070

(State of Incorporation)

 

(IRS Employer Identification No.)







 

 

15901 Olden Street, Sylmar, California

 

91342

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)







(818) 362-8391

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:





 

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $1.00 par value

 

The New York Stock Exchange



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No  ☒ 



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes   No  



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   No 



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ☒  No 



Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “accelerated filer”,filer,” “large accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):





 

 

 

 

 

 

Large accelerated filer

 

Accelerated filer

 

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

 

Smaller reportingEmerging growth company

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)



If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   No



The aggregate market value of voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,211,384,936$1,116,725,095 as of June 28, 2014,30, 2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.



The number of shares of Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share, outstanding at February 20, 201521, 2018 was 48,671,492.49,791,010.



Documents Incorporated by Reference



Portions of the definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K.

 

 


 











TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION



20142017 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K



TABLE OF CONTENTS





 

 



 

PAGE

PART II.

 

 

Item 11.

Business

314

Item 1A1A.

Risk Factors

1419

11 

Item 1B1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

1915 

Item 22.

Properties

2016 

Item 33.

Legal Proceedings

2116 

Item 44.

Mine Safety Disclosures

2116 



 

 

PART IIII.

 

 

Item 55.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

2217 

Item 66.

Selected Financial Data

2324

19 

Item 77.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2442

20 

Item 7A7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

4228 

Item 88.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4228 

Item 99.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

4228 

Item 9A9A.

Controls and Procedures

4243

29 

Item 9B9B.

Other Information

4531 



 

 

PART IIIIII.

 

 

Item 1010.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

4531 

Item 1111.

Executive Compensation

4531 

Item 1212.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

4531 

Item 1313.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

4531 

Item 1414.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

4531 



 

 

PART IVIV.

 

 

Item 1515.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

4632 



Signatures

4734 





 

2

 


 

Table of Contents

 

PART I.



Forward-lookingForward-Looking Statements



The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), including without limitation, statements regarding our management’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future and statements regarding future guidance or estimates and non-historical performance. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith, and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are listed and discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors, below. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.



ITEM 1. BUSINESS



General



Tutor Perini Corporation, formerly known as Perini Corporation, was incorporated in 1918 as a successor to businesses whichthat had been engaged in providing construction services since 1894. Tutor Perini Corporation and(together with its consolidated subsidiaries, (“Tutor“Tutor Perini,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” unless the context indicates otherwise) is a leading construction company, based on revenues,revenue as ranked by Engineering News-Record (“ENR”), offering diversified general contracting, construction management and design-build services to private customers and public agencies throughout the world. Our corporate headquarters are in Los Angeles (Sylmar), California, and we have various other principal offices throughout the United States and its territories (see Item 2. Properties for a listing of our major facilities). Our common stock (“Common Stock”) is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TPC.” We are incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.



We and our predecessors have provided construction services since 1894 and have established a strong reputation within our markets byfor executing large, complex projects on time and within budget while adhering to strict quality control measures. We offer general contracting, pre-construction planning and comprehensive project management services, including the planning and scheduling of the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for a project. We also offer self-performed construction services including site work,work; concrete forming and placement,placement; steel erection, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, anderection; electrical; mechanical; plumbing; heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC).

; and fire protection. During 2014,2017, we performed work on more thanapproximately 1,500 construction projects. Our corporate headquarters

In 2017, ENR ranked Tutor Perini as the ninth largest domestic contractor. We are recognized as one of the leading civil contractors in Sylmar, California, and we have various other principal office locations throughout the United States, as evidenced by our past and certain U.S. territories (see Item 2. Properties for a listingcurrent performance on several of our major facilities). Our common stock is listed on the country’s largest mass-transit and transportation projects, such as the East Side Access project in New York Stock Exchange underCity, the symbol “TPC”.California High-Speed Rail System, the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR 99) project in Seattle, McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas, major portions of the Red Line and Purple Line segments of the Los Angeles subway system, and the San Francisco Central Subway extension to Chinatown. We are incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Our business is conducted through three  basic segments: Civil, Building, and Specialty Contractors, as described below in the “Business Segment Overview”.

Historically, we have beenalso recognized as one of the leading building contractors in the United States, as evidenced by our performance on several of the country’s largest hospitality and gamingbuilding development projects, including Project CityCenter and the Cosmopolitan Casino and Resort, and large transportation projects such as the McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas Nevada. Inand Hudson Yards in New York City.

Since the 2008 we embarked upon a strategy to better alignmerger between our business to pursue markets with higher profit margins and the best long-term growth potential, while maintaining our presence as a leading contractor in the general building market. In September 2008, we completed a merger withpredecessor companies, Tutor-Saliba Corporation (“Tutor-Saliba”) to provide us with enhanced opportunities forand Perini Corporation, we have experienced significant growth not available to us on a stand-alone basis throughsupported by our increased size, scale, andbonding capacity, access to broader geographic regions, expanded management capabilities, complementary assets and expertise, particularly Tutor-Saliba’sparticular expertise in civil projects, immediate access to multiple geographic regions,large, complex projects. In 2010 and increased ability to compete for a large number of projects, particularly in the civil construction segment due to an increased bonding capacity. The success of the Tutor-Saliba merger and the execution of the Company’s strategy to focus on acquiring higher-margin civil projects are best illustrated by the dramatic growth2011, we have experienced in our Civil segment. Despite the economic challenges associated with state and local funding over the past several years, our Civil segment’s backlog, revenue, and income from construction operations have more than quadrupled since 2008.

In late 2010, we saw opportunities to continue to build our Companyexpanded vertically and geographically through the strategic acquisitions of seven companies which havewith demonstrated success in their respective markets. By the third quarter of 2011, we had completed the acquisition of seven companies with a combined backlog of $2.6 billion at their respective acquisition dates. These acquisitions further strengthened our geographic presence in our Building and Civil segments and also significantly increased our specialty contracting capabilities. In the third quarter of 2011, we completed an internal reorganization of our reporting segments with the creation of the Specialty Contractors segment, which we describe below.  Furthermore, during the first quarter

Our acquisitions have enabled us to provide customers with a vertically integrated service offering. This vertical integration is a unique capability and competitive advantage that allows us to self-perform a greater amount of 2014, we completedwork than our competitors. Our vertical integration increases our competitiveness in bidding and our efficiency in managing and executing large, complex projects. It also provides us with significant cross-selling opportunities across a broad geographic footprint.

3

 


 

Table of Contents

 

reorganization which resulted in the elimination of the Management Services reporting unit and reportable segment. The Management Services reporting unit formerly consisted of two subsidiary companies, Black Construction and Perini Management Services, which have since been included in the Civil and Building segments, respectively.  This reorganization was completed due to the Management Services unit no longer meeting the criteria set forth in FASB ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting”.

We believe that the successful completion of our acquisition strategy has enabled us to realize cross-selling opportunities across an expanded geographic footprint, while continuing to focus on vertical integration through increased self-performed work capabilities, thus further improving profitability, and providing greater stability during economic cycles.

Business Segment Overview

Our business is conducted through three segments: Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors.



Civil Segment



Our Civil segment specializes in public works construction and the repair, replacement and reconstruction of infrastructure across most of the major geographic regions of the United States. Our civil contracting services include construction and rehabilitation of highways, bridges, mass transittunnels, mass-transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities.



The Civil segment is comprised of the Company’s legacy heavy civil construction operations (civil operations of our predecessors, Tutor-Saliba, its subsidiary Black Construction, and Perini Corporation), as well as Frontier-Kemper, Lunda Construction and Becho. The Company’s legacy heavy civil units operate primarily on the former Perini CorporationWest Coast and Tutor-Saliba, including Black Construction)East Coast of the United States and three companies described hereafter, which the Company acquiredare engaged in 2011.a variety of large mass-transit, transportation, bridge and highway projects. Frontier-Kemper is a heavy civil contractor which buildsengaged in the construction of tunnels for highways, railroads, subways and rapid transit systems, as well assystems; the construction of shafts and other facilities for water supply, wastewater transport and hydroelectric projects. It also developsprojects; and equipsthe development and equipping of mines with innovative hoisting, elevator and vertical conveyance systems for the mining industry.systems. Lunda Construction is a heavy civil contractor engagedspecializing in the construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of bridges, railroads and other civil structures in the Midwest and throughout the United States. Becho specializesis engaged in drilling, foundation and excavation support for shoring, bridges, piers, roads and highway projects, primarily in the southwestern U.S.United States. We believe that the Company has benefitted throughfrom these acquisitions by allowing us to expand ouran expanded geographic presence, enhance ourenhanced civil construction capabilities and addthe addition of experienced management with a proven, successful track record.records.



Our Civil segment’s customers primarily award contracts through one of two methods: the traditional public “competitive bid” method, in which price is the major determining factor, or through a request for proposalsproposal, where contracts are awarded based on a combination of technical capabilityqualifications, proposed project team, schedule, past performance on similar projects and price.



Traditionally, our Civil segmentsegment’s customers require each contractor to pre-qualify for construction business by meeting criteria that include technical capabilities and financial strength. Our financial strength and outstanding record of performance on challenging civil works projects often enablesenable us to pre-qualify for projects in situations where smaller, less diversified contractors are unable to meet the qualification requirements. We believe this is a competitive advantage that makes us an attractive partner on the largest, most complex infrastructure projects and prestigious design-build, or DBOM (design-build-operate-maintain) contracts, which combine the nation’s top contractors with engineering firms, equipment manufacturers, and project development consultants in a competitive bid selection process to execute highly sophisticated public worksor P3 (public-private partnership) projects.



In its 20142017 rankings, ENR ranked us as the nation’s fifththird largest domestic heavy contractor and fourth largest contractor in the bridge market and the mass transit and rail market, sixth largest domestic contractor in heavy construction, eighth largest in the transportation market, ninth largest in airports, and tenth largest in highways and mining.market.



We believe the Civil segment provides us with significant opportunities for growth due to the age and condition of existing infrastructure coupled with large government funding sources aimed at the replacement and repairreconstruction of aging U.S. infrastructure and popular, often bipartisan, support from votersthe public and elected officials for infrastructure improvement programs. Funding for major civil infrastructure projects is typically provided through a combination of one or more of the following: local, regional, state and/orand federal loans, grants, andloans; grants; other direct allocations sourced through tax revenues, bonds, and/orrevenue; bonds; user fees.  For example, the California High-Speed Rail project, with an estimated total cost of approximately $67.5 billion, is being funded in its initial stages through more than $3 billion of federal stimulus fundsfees; and, $9 billion of voter-approved bond funds. Additional funding will come from California’s Cap and Trade proceeds and the private sector. The Federal Highway Trust Fund also provides funding for certain transportation projects. Some large civil projects, also benefit from funding provided through alternative sources, such as public-private partnerships.private capital.



We have been active in civil construction since 1894 and believe we have a particular expertise in large, complex civil construction projects. We have completed or are currently working on some of the most significant civil construction projects in the United States. For example, we are currently working on various portions of the East Side Access project in New York City, the first segmentphase of the California High-Speed Rail project;project, the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR-99 bored tunnel)(SR 99) project in Seattle, Washington; the Third Street Light Rail —Purple Line Segment 2 expansion project in Los Angeles, the San Francisco Central Subway project in San Francisco, California;extension to Chinatown, the platform over the eastern rail yard and the Amtrak Tunneltunnel at Hudson Yards in New York City; the Queens Plaza substation project in Queens, New York;City, and the rehabilitation of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge in New York; the I-5 Antlers Bridge replacement in Shasta County, California; the New Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California; the Harold Structures mass transit

4


Table of Contents

project in Queens, New York; and the construction of express toll lanes along I-95 in Maryland.York. We have also performed runway widening and reconstructioncompleted projects at the John F. Kennedy International Airport in Queens, New York;York, the runway paving project at Andrews AFBLos Angeles International Airport, the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, the New Irvington Tunnel in Maryland;Fremont, California, the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California;California and various segments of the East Side Access projectexpress toll lanes along I-95 in New York.Maryland.



Building Segment



Our Building segment has significant experience providing services to a number of specialized building markets for private and public works customers, including the hospitality and gaming, transportation, healthcare, municipalhealth care, commercial offices, government facilities, sports and entertainment, education, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical, industrial and high-tech markets.high-tech. We believe ourthe success withinof the Building segment results from our proven ability to manage and perform large, complex projects with aggressive fast-track schedules,schedules; elaborate designsdesigns; and advanced mechanical, electrical and life safety systems, while providing accurate budgeting and strict quality

4


Table of Contents

control. Although price is a key competitive factor, we believe our strong reputation, long-standing customer relationships and significant level of repeat and referral business have enabled us to achieve oura leading position.position in the marketplace.



The Building segment is comprised of the Company’s legacy buildingseveral operating units that provide general contracting, design-build, preconstruction and construction operations (building operationsservices in various regions of the former Perini Corporation and Tutor-Saliba, includingUnited States. Tutor Perini Building Corp., focuses on large, complex building projects nationwide, including significant projects in the hospitality and gaming, commercial office, education, government facilities, and multi-unit residential markets. Rudolph and Sletten and James A. Cummings, as well as Perini Management Services) and two companies described hereafter, which the Company acquired subsequent to the Tutor-Saliba merger in 2008. Keating Building Company is a construction management and design-build company with expertise in both private and public works buildingfocuses on large, complex projects in California in the northeastern U.S.health care, commercial office, technology, industrial, education, and Mid-Atlantic regions.government facilities markets. Roy Anderson Corp. (formerly known as Anderson Companies) provides general contracting, design-build, preconstruction, construction management, andits services, including disaster rapid response services, to public and private customers primarily throughout the southeastern United States. Perini Management Services provides diversified construction and design-build services internationally to U.S. government agencies, as well as to surety companies and has expertise in hospitality and gaming, commercial, government, healthcare, industrial and educational facilities.multi-national corporations. We believe that the Company has benefitted through these acquisitions by strengthening our positions in the eastern and southeastern United States, and we believe that our national resourcesexpertise and strong resumerésumé of notable projects will enable future growth potential for these companies onpositions us well to win additional large, complex building projects.



In its 20142017 rankings, ENR ranked us as the tenthninth largest generaldomestic building contractor in the United States. Within the general building category, we were ranked as the third largest builder in the entertainment and casinos market, seventh largest in the multi-unit residential market, and eighth largest in the government offices market.contractor. We are a recognized leader in the hospitality and gaming market, specializing in the construction of high-end destination resorts and casinos and Native American developments.casinos. We work with hotel operators, Native American tribal councils, developers and architectural firms to provide diversified construction services to meet the challenges of new construction and renovation of hotel and resort properties. We believe that our reputation for completing projects on time is a significant competitive advantage in this market, as any delay in project completion could result in significant loss of revenuesrevenue for the customer.



We have been awarded and have recently completed, or are currently working on, large public worksprivate and privatepublic building projects across a wide array of building end markets, including commercial offices, multi-unit residential, healthcare,health care, hospitality and gaming, transportation, education, and entertainment, among others, including the Panoramaentertainment. Specific projects include a large corporate office building in northern California for a confidential technology customer; Tower in Miami, Florida; the SouthC (commercial) and Tower (“Tower C”)D (multi-unit residential) at Hudson Yards and the George Washington Bridge Bus Station redevelopment, both in New York City; the Washington Hospital expansion in Fremont, California; the Graton Rancheria Resort and Casino in Rohnert Park, California; the ChumashPechanga Resort and Casino Resort expansion in Santa Ynez,Temecula, California; the Scarlet PearlMaryland Live! Casino Resortexpansion in D’Iberville, Mississippi;Hanover, Maryland; the Broadway Plaza retail development in Walnut Creek, California; the McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas, Nevada; Kaiser Hospital Buildings in San Leandro and Redwood City, California; and courthouses in San Bernardino and San Diego, California and Broward County, Florida. As a result of our reputation and track record, we were previously awarded and have completed contracts for several marquee projects in the hospitality and gaming market, including the Resorts World New York Casino in Jamaica, New York, and Projectas well as CityCenter, Thethe Cosmopolitan, Resort and Casino, the Wynn Encore Hotel, Trump International Hotel and theTower, Paris Las Vegas and Planet Hollywood Tower, all in Las Vegas, Nevada. TheseVegas. The above projects span a wide array of building end markets and they illustrate our Building segment’s resumerésumé of performance onsuccessfully completed large-scale public and private projects.



Specialty Contractors Segment



Our Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems and pneumatically placed concrete for a full range of civil and building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass transitmass-transit end markets, among others.markets. This segment provides the Company with unique strengthensstrengths and capabilities whichthat position us as a full-service contractor with greater control over project bids and costs, scheduled work, project delivery and risk management.



The Specialty Contractors segment is comprised of the followingseveral operating units whichthat provide unique services in various regions of the United States:States. Five Star Electric has established itself as an industry leader and is one of the largest electrical contractors in New York City. Five Star Electric provides construction services in the electrical sector, including power, lighting, fire alarm, security, telecommunications, low voltage and wireless systems to both the public and private sectors. These services are provided across end markets that include multi-unit residential, hotels, commercial offices, industrial, mass transit, education, retail, sports and entertainment, health care and water treatment. Fisk Electric covers many of the major commercial, transportation and industrial electrical construction markets in California and the southern United States, with the ability to cover other attractive markets nationwide. Fisk’s expertise is in technology design and the development of electrical and technology systems for major projects spanning a broad variety of project types, including commercial office buildings, sports arenas, hospitals, research laboratories, hotels and casinos, convention centers, manufacturing plants, refineries, and water and wastewater treatment facilities. WDF, Nagelbush and Desert Mechanical each provide mechanical, plumbing, HVAC and fire protection services to a range of customers in a wide variety of markets, including transportation, commercial/industrial, schools and universities and residential. WDF is one of the largest mechanical contractors servicing the New York City metropolitan region. Nagelbush operates primarily in Florida and Desert Mechanical operates primarily in the western United States. Superior Gunite specializes in pneumatically placed structural concrete utilized in infrastructure projects nationwide, such as bridges, dams, tunnels and retaining walls.



In its 2017 rankings, ENR ranked us as the fifth largest electrical contractor1, twelfth largest mechanical contractor1 and tenth largest specialty contractor1 in the United States. Through Five Star Electric and WDF, collectively, we are also the largest specialty contractor in the New York City metropolitan area.

1This ranking represents the collective revenue of the Company’s specialty contracting subsidiaries as reported to ENR.

·

Five Star Electric provides electrical light, power, and low-voltage systems installation to a range of public and private sector customers in the New York City metropolitan area, including high-end residential, hotel and commercial towers, transportation, water treatment plants, schools and universities, and government facilities.

5

 


 

Table of Contents

 

·

Fisk Electric covers many of the major commercial, transportation, and industrial electrical construction markets in the southwestern and southeastern U.S. with the ability to cover other attractive markets nationwide. Fisk’s expertise is in the design and development of electrical and technology systems for major projects spanning a broad variety of project types, including commercial office buildings, sports arenas, hospitals, research laboratories, hospitality and casinos, convention centers, and industrial facilities.

·

WDF,Nagelbush, and Desert Mechanical provide mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, and fire protection services to a range of customers in a wide variety of markets, including transportation, infrastructure, commercial, schools and universities, residential, and specialty construction. WDF services the New York City metropolitan region, Nagelbush operates primarily in the southeastern U.S., and Desert Mechanical operates primarily in the western U.S.

·

Superior Gunite specializes in pneumatically placed structural concrete utilized in infrastructure projects such as bridges, dams, tunnels, and retaining walls throughout the U.S.

In its 2014 rankings, ENR ranked us as the fifth largest electrical contractor in the U.S. and the eighth largest specialty contractor nationwide. We are also the largest specialty contractor in the New York region.

Our Specialty Contractors segment has been awarded, hasunits have recently completed, work on, or isare currently working on, severalvarious portions of the East Side Access project in New York City, various projects at the World Trade Center and at Hudson Yards in New York City;City, two signal system modernization projects in New York City;City and electrical work for the new hospital at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.Center in Dallas. This Specialty Contractors segment has also supported, or is currently supporting, several large public works projects in our BuildingCivil and CivilBuilding segments, including the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR-99 bored tunnel)(SR 99) project in Seattle, Washington; theSeattle; McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas, Nevada;Vegas; the Resorts World New York Casino in Jamaica, New York; various segments of the Greenwich Street Corridor and East Side Access projects in New York City; the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California; the New Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California; and several marquee projects in the hospitality and gaming market, including Project CityCenter, Thethe Cosmopolitan, Resortthe Wynn Encore Hotel, Trump International Hotel and Casino,Tower, and the Planet Hollywood Tower, all in Las Vegas, Nevada.Vegas.



The majority of the work performed by ourthe Specialty Contractors unitssegment is contracted directly with project owners, including state and local municipal agencies, school districts, real estate developers, general contractors, school districts and general contractors.commercial and industrial customers. A smaller, but growing,  component of its work is performed as a subcontractor to the Company’sfor our Civil and Building and Civil groups.

6segments.




Table of Contents

Markets and Customers



OurWe provide diversified construction services are targeted towardto a variety of end markets that are diversified across project types, customer characteristics and geographic locations. During the first quarter of 2014, the Company completed a reorganization which resulted in the elimination of the Management Services reporting unit and reportable segment. The Management Services reporting unit formerly consisted of the following subsidiary companies: Black Construction and Perini Management Services. The reorganization was completed due to changes in volume of business resulting in a change in organizational structure as the unit no longer met the criteria set forth in FASB ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting”.

customers. The following tables set forth certain reportable segment information relating to the Company’s operationoperations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012. In accordance with the accounting guidance on segment reporting, the Company has restated the comparative prior period information for the reorganized reportable segments:2015.



Revenues by business segment for fiscal years 2014,  2013 and 2012 are set forth below:









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues by Business Segment

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

(in thousands)

Revenue by Business Segment

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Civil

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

 

$

1,335,993 

$

1,602,175 

 

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

Building

 

 

1,503,837 

 

 

1,551,979 

 

 

1,592,441 

 

1,941,325 

 

 

2,069,841 

 

 

1,802,535 

Specialty Contractors

 

 

1,301,328 

 

 

1,182,277 

 

 

1,183,037 

 

1,213,708 

 

 

1,234,272 

 

 

1,228,030 

Total

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

4,175,672 

 

$

4,111,471 

$

4,757,208 

 

$

4,973,076 

 

$

4,920,472 





Revenues by end market for the Civil segment for fiscal years 2014,  2013 and 2012 are set forth below:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Mass Transit

$

733,059 

 

$

547,913 

 

$

450,436 

Bridges

 

432,177 

 

 

533,762 

 

 

662,553 

Highways

 

250,850 

 

 

290,745 

 

 

388,963 

Other

 

186,089 

 

 

296,543 

 

 

387,955 

Total

$

1,602,175 

 

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Revenues by End Market

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(in thousands)

Bridges

 

$

535,733 

 

$

501,867 

 

$

548,641 

Mass Transit

 

 

534,110 

 

 

364,148 

 

 

217,292 

Highways

 

 

156,443 

 

 

211,316 

 

 

228,652 

Other

 

 

460,858 

 

 

364,085 

 

 

341,408 

Total

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

 

$

1,335,993 

Revenues by end market for the Building segment for fiscal years 2014,  2013 and 2012 are set forth below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Segment Revenues by End Market

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

(in thousands)

Building Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Office

$

470,017 

 

$

441,591 

 

$

226,928 

Hospitality and Gaming

 

430,757 

 

 

216,224 

 

 

250,757 

Health Care Facilities

 

264,403 

 

 

235,005 

 

 

164,963 

Mixed Use

 

156,497 

 

 

163,454 

 

 

112,737 

Municipal and Government

 

149,225 

 

 

262,022 

 

 

335,762 

Education Facilities

 

$

337,062 

 

$

280,685 

 

$

190,968 

 

142,784 

 

 

157,808 

 

 

186,944 

Municipal and Government

 

 

300,274 

 

 

325,258 

 

 

224,483 

Healthcare Facilities

 

 

127,963 

 

 

296,294 

 

 

346,379 

Hospitality and Gaming

 

 

101,819 

 

 

376,620 

 

 

238,915 

Industrial Buildings

 

 

90,194 

 

 

34,802 

 

 

286,677 

Mass Transit

 

 

40,676 

 

 

10,755 

 

 

10,909 

Condominiums

 

106,513 

 

 

193,755 

 

 

125,949 

Industrial and Commercial

 

70,747 

 

 

271,480 

 

 

266,921 

Other

 

 

505,849 

 

 

227,565 

 

 

294,110 

 

150,382 

 

 

128,502 

 

 

131,574 

Total

 

$

1,503,837 

 

$

1,551,979 

 

$

1,592,441 

$

1,941,325 

 

$

2,069,841 

 

$

1,802,535 



76

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Revenues by end market for the Specialty Contractors segment for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012 are set forth below:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Contractors Segment

 

Revenues by End Market

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

(in thousands)

Industrial Buildings

 

$

276,008 

 

$

212,438 

 

$

201,987 

Specialty Contractors Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Mass Transit

$

279,524 

 

$

204,398 

 

$

107,120 

Mixed Use

 

212,780 

 

 

159,286 

 

 

96,072 

Industrial and Commercial

 

177,605 

 

 

186,769 

 

 

164,480 

Education Facilities

 

 

230,645 

 

 

123,910 

 

 

94,463 

 

131,606 

 

 

80,476 

 

 

195,647 

Mass Transit

 

 

217,318 

 

 

174,778 

 

 

203,242 

Office Buildings

 

 

129,350 

 

 

137,189 

 

 

189,447 

Condominiums

 

 

105,670 

 

 

133,916 

 

 

91,151 

 

123,152 

 

 

239,937 

 

 

266,648 

Hospitality and Gaming

 

 

46,901 

 

 

69,327 

 

 

22,104 

Municipal and Government

 

 

23,034 

 

 

39,621 

 

 

103,193 

Transportation

 

96,715 

 

 

164,468 

 

 

149,971 

Health Care Facilities

 

80,456 

 

 

60,233 

 

 

40,228 

Wastewater Treatment

 

26,709 

 

 

58,479 

 

 

73,094 

Other

 

 

272,402 

 

 

291,098 

 

 

277,450 

 

85,161 

 

 

80,226 

 

 

134,770 

Total

 

$

1,301,328 

 

$

1,182,277 

 

$

1,183,037 

$

1,213,708 

 

$

1,234,272 

 

$

1,228,030 

We provide our services to a broad range of private and public customers. The allocation of our revenues by customer source for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012 is set forth below:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues by Customer Source

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

State and Local Governments

 

56 

%

 

60 

%

 

53 

%

Private Owners

 

40 

%

 

35 

%

 

41 

%

Federal Government Agencies

 

%

 

%

 

%

 

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

Revenue by Customer Type

2017

 

2016

 

2015

State and Local Agencies

47 

%

 

49 

%

 

55 

%

Private Owners

46 

%

 

45 

%

 

40 

%

Federal Agencies

%

 

%

 

%

Total

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%



State and Local GovernmentsAgencies. We derived approximately 56% of our revenues from state and local government customers during 2014. Our state and local government customers include state transportation departments, metropolitan authorities, cities, municipal agencies, school districts and public universities. We provide services to our state and local customers primarily pursuant to contracts awarded through competitive bidding processes. Our building construction services for state and local government customers have included judicial and correctional facilities, schools and dormitories, healthcarehealth care facilities, convention centers, parking structures and other municipal buildings. OurThe vast majority of our civil contracting and building construction services are provided in locations throughout the country.United States and its territories.



Private Owners. We derived approximately 40% of our revenues from private customers during 2014. Our private customers include private real estate developers, healthcarehealth care companies, technology companies, major hospitality and gaming resort owners, Native American sovereign nations, public corporations and private universities. We provide services to our private customers through negotiated contract arrangements, as well as through competitive bids.



Federal Government Agencies. We derived approximately 4% of our revenues fromOur federal government agencies during 2014. These agencies have includedcustomers include the U.S. State Department, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the U.S. Air Force.Force and the National Park Service. We provide services to federal agencies primarily pursuant to contracts for specific or multi-year assignments that involve new construction or infrastructure repairs or improvements. A substantial portion of our revenuesrevenue from federal agencies is derived from projects in overseas locations. Welocations, which we expect this to continue for the foreseeable future as a result of our expanding base of experience and strong relationships with federal agencies, together with anticipated stable expenditures for defense, diplomatic and security-related construction work primarily associated with the ongoing threats of terrorism.work.



Most federal, state and local government contracts contain provisions whichthat permit the termination of contracts, in whole or in part, for the convenience of the government, among other reasons.



For additional information on customers, markets, measures of profit or loss,revenue and total assets both U.S and foreign,by geographic location, see Note 12Business Segments of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15. Statements.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

87

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Backlog



Backlog

in our industry is a measure of the total value of work that is remaining to be performed on projects that have been awarded. We include a construction project in our backlog at such time aswhen a contract is awarded or a letter of commitment is obtainedwhen we have otherwise received written definitive notice that the project has been awarded to us and there are no remaining major uncertainties that the project will proceed (e.g., we believe adequate construction funding is in place.place). As a result, we believe theour backlog figures areis firm, subject only to the cancellation provisions containedand although cancellations or scope adjustments may occur, historically they have not been material. Our backlog by segment, end market and customer type is presented in the various contracts. Historically, these provisions have not had a material effect on us.following tables:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog by Business Segment

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Civil

$

4,118,243 

 

57 

%

 

$

2,672,126 

 

43 

%

Building

 

1,701,378 

 

23 

%

 

 

1,981,193 

 

32 

%

Specialty Contractors

 

1,463,813 

 

20 

%

 

 

1,573,818 

 

25 

%

Total

$

7,283,434 

 

100 

%

 

$

6,227,137 

 

100 

%

Backlog is summarized below by business segment

We estimate that approximately $3.6 billion, or 49%, of our backlog as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. In accordance with the accounting guidance on segment reporting, the Company has restated the comparative prior period information for the reorganized reportable segments:2017 will be recognized as revenue in 2018.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Backlog by End Market

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Mass Transit

$

2,562,725 

 

62 

%

 

$

1,853,117 

 

69 

%

Bridges

 

617,084 

 

15 

%

 

 

297,810 

 

11 

%

Highways

 

480,918 

 

12 

%

 

 

379,630 

 

14 

%

Other

 

457,516 

 

11 

%

 

 

141,569 

 

%

Total

$

4,118,243 

 

100 

%

 

$

2,672,126 

 

100 

%









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog by Business Segment

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

Civil

 

$

3,563,239 

 

45 

%

 

$

3,538,094 

 

51 

%

Building

 

 

2,187,767 

 

28 

%

 

 

1,755,049 

 

25 

%

Specialty Contractors

 

 

2,080,719 

 

27 

%

 

 

1,661,144 

 

24 

%

Total

 

$

7,831,725 

 

100 

%

 

$

6,954,287 

 

100 

%

We estimate that approximately $3.7 billion, or 47.8%, of our backlog at December 31, 2014 will be recognized as revenue in 2015.

Backlog by end market for the Civil segment as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is set forth below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Backlog by End Market

 

December 31,

 

2014

 

2013

 

(dollars in thousands)

Mass Transit

 

$

1,934,028 

 

54 

%

 

$

1,623,728 

 

47 

%

Bridges

 

 

894,975 

 

25 

%

 

 

1,041,856 

 

29 

%

Highways

 

 

349,399 

 

10 

%

 

 

252,918 

 

%

Building Segment Backlog by End Market

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Health Care Facilities

$

377,768 

 

22 

%

 

$

192,280 

 

10 

%

Municipal and Government

 

332,073 

 

20 

%

 

206,164 

 

10 

%

Industrial and Commercial

 

252,081 

 

15 

%

 

74,787 

 

%

Hospitality and Gaming

 

229,220 

 

13 

%

 

517,017 

 

26 

%

Mixed Use

 

 

205,881 

 

%

 

 

425,717 

 

12 

%

 

162,291 

 

10 

%

 

249,088 

 

13 

%

Education Facilities

 

105,585 

 

%

 

168,634 

 

%

Office

 

101,306 

 

%

 

342,034 

 

17 

%

Condominiums

 

49,427 

 

%

 

169,366 

 

%

Other

 

 

178,956 

 

%

 

 

193,875 

 

%

 

91,627 

 

%

 

 

61,823 

 

%

Total

 

$

3,563,239 

 

100 

%

 

$

3,538,094 

 

100 

%

$

1,701,378 

 

100 

%

 

$

1,981,193 

 

100 

%







Backlog by end market for the Building segment as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is set forth below:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Segment Backlog by End Market

 

December 31,

 

2014

 

2013

 

(dollars in thousands)

Municipal and Government

 

$

555,990 

 

25 

%

 

$

709,064 

 

41 

%

Education Facilities

 

 

318,380 

 

15 

%

 

 

444,110 

 

25 

%

Healthcare Facilities

 

 

276,123 

 

13 

%

 

 

74,980 

 

%

Hospitality and Gaming

 

 

265,565 

 

12 

%

 

 

40,621 

 

%

Specialty Contractors Segment Backlog by End Market

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Mass Transit

 

 

97,261 

 

%

 

 

127,390 

 

%

$

780,457 

 

53 

%

 

$

612,688 

 

39 

%

Mixed Use

 

 

78,751 

 

%

 

 

238,576 

 

14 

%

 

128,669 

 

%

 

239,763 

 

15 

%

Condominiums

 

115,612 

 

%

 

153,354 

 

10 

%

Industrial and Commercial

 

107,927 

 

%

 

130,028 

 

%

Education Facilities

 

96,533 

 

%

 

83,897 

 

%

Health Care Facilities

 

66,537 

 

%

 

101,494 

 

%

Transportation

 

58,819 

 

%

 

105,990 

 

%

Other

 

 

595,697 

 

27 

%

 

 

120,308 

 

%

 

109,259 

 

%

 

 

146,604 

 

10 

%

Total

 

$

2,187,767 

 

100 

%

 

$

1,755,049 

 

100 

%

$

1,463,813 

 

100 

%

 

$

1,573,818 

 

100 

%





98

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Backlog by end market for the Specialty Contractors segment as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is set forth below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Contractors Segment Backlog by End Market

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

Mass Transit

 

$

805,253 

 

38 

%

 

$

469,099 

 

28 

%

Education Facilities

 

 

239,487 

 

12 

%

 

 

290,517 

 

17 

%

Condominiums

 

 

220,466 

 

11 

%

 

 

110,823 

 

%

Industrial Buildings

 

 

144,076 

 

%

 

 

204,126 

 

12 

%

Wastewater Treatment

 

 

98,669 

 

%

 

 

65,475 

 

%

Office Buildings

 

 

85,891 

 

%

 

 

101,799 

 

%

Healthcare Facilities

 

 

24,664 

 

%

 

 

49,008 

 

%

Hospitality and Gaming

 

 

11,991 

 

%

 

 

34,829 

 

%

Other

 

 

450,222 

 

21 

%

 

 

335,468 

 

21 

%

Total

 

$

2,080,719 

 

100 

%

 

$

1,661,144 

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

Backlog by Customer Type

2017

 

2016

State and Local Agencies

66 

%

 

57 

%

Private Owners

26 

%

 

36 

%

Federal Agencies

%

 

%

Total

100 

%

 

100 

%



We have seen over the past several years a significant shift in the mix of our customers from private to state and local government agencies, which has corresponded with an increased share of our Civil segment’s contributions to revenues and operating profits over the period. We intend to continue our focus on increasing our share of higher-margin public works and specialty contracting projects  to further enhance our consolidated operating margins, as well as continuing to capture our share of large private building work on an opportunistic basis.

Competition

The construction industry is highly competitive and the markets in which we compete include numerous competitors. In the small to mid-size work that we have targeted, we have continued to experience strong pricing competition from our competitors. However, the majority of the work that we target is for larger, more complex projects where the number of active market participants is smaller because of the capabilities and resources required to perform the work. As a result, on these larger projects we face fewer competitors, as smaller contractors are unable to effectively compete or are unable to secure bonding to support large projects.

In our Civil segment, we compete principally with large civil construction firms, including Dragados USA, Flatiron Construction Corp., Fluor Corp., Granite Construction, Kiewit Corp., Skanska USA, Traylor Bros., Inc., and The Walsh Group. In certain end markets of the Building segment, such as hospitality and gaming and multi-unit residential, we are one of the largest providers of construction services in the United States. In our Building segment, we compete with a variety of national and regional contractors. Our primary competitors are AECOM (through its acquisitions of Tishman Construction and Hunt Construction Group), Balfour Beatty Construction, Clark Construction Group, DPR Construction, Gilbane, Inc., Hensel Phelps Construction Co., McCarthy Building Companies, Inc., Skanska USA, Turner Construction Co., The Walsh Group, and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. In our Specialty Contractors segment, we compete principally with various regional electrical, mechanical, and plumbing subcontractors. We believe price, experience, reputation, responsiveness, customer relationships, project completion track record, schedule control and delivery, risk management, and quality of work are key factors in customers awarding contracts across our end markets.

Types of Contracts and The Contract Process

Types of Contracts



The general contracting and management services we provide consist of planning and scheduling the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for the timely completion of a project in accordance with the terms, plans and specifications contained in a construction contract. We provide these services by entering into traditional general contracting arrangements such as fixed price, guaranteed maximum price, and cost plus fee contracts. These contract types and the risks generally inherent therein are discussed below:follows:

·

Fixed price (FP) contracts, which include fixed unit priceor lump sum contracts are generallymost commonly used for projects in competitively bid public civil, building,the Civil and specialty construction projectsSpecialty Contractors segments and generally commit the contractorCompany to provide all of the resources required to complete a project for a fixed sum or atsum. Usually, fixed unit prices. Usually FPprice contracts transfer more risk to the contractorCompany, but offer the opportunity under favorable circumstances, for greater profits. FP contracts represent a significant portion of our publicly bid civil construction projects. We also perform publicly bid building and specialty construction projects and certain task order contracts for U.S. government agencies in our Building segment under FP contracts.

10


Table of Contents

·

Guaranteed maximum price (GMP)(“GMP”) contracts provide for a cost plus fee arrangement up to a maximum agreed upon price. These contracts place risks on the contractorCompany for amounts in excess of the GMP, but may permit an opportunity for greater profits than under Cost Pluscost plus fee contracts through sharing agreements with the owner on any cost savings that may be realized. Services provided by our Building segment to various private customers are often are performed under GMP contracts.

·

Unit price contracts are most prevalent for projects in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments and generally commit the Company to provide an undetermined number of units or components that comprise a project at a fixed price per unit. This approach shifts the risk of estimating the quantity of units required to the project owner, but the risk of increased cost per unit is borne by the Company, unless otherwise allowed for in the contract.

·

Cost plus fee (Cost Plus)contracts are used for many projects in the Building and Specialty Contractors segments. Cost plus fee contracts include cost plus fixed fee contracts and cost plus award fee contracts. Cost plus fixed fee contracts provide for reimbursement of approved project costs plus a fixed fee. Cost plus award fee contracts provide for reimbursement of the costs required to complete a project plus a stipulated fee arrangement. Cost Plus contracts include cost plus fixed fee (CPFF) contracts and cost plus award fee (CPAF) contracts. CPFF contracts provide for reimbursement of the costs required to complete a project plus a fixed fee. CPAF contracts provide for reimbursement of the costs required to complete a project plus a base fee, as well as an incentive fee based on cost and/or schedule performance. Cost Plusplus fee contracts serve to minimize the contractor’sCompany’s financial risk, but may also limit profits.



Historically,Fixed price contracts account for a high percentage of our contracts have been of the GMP and FP type. As a result of increasing opportunities in public works civil and building markets, combined with our increased resume of notable projects and expertise and the execution of our acquisition strategy, FP contracts have accounted for an increasingsubstantial portion of our revenues since 2008revenue and are expected to continue to represent a sizeable percentage of both total revenuesrevenue and backlog. The composition of revenuesrevenue and backlog by type of contract for fiscal years 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 is as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues for the

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

Cost Plus, GMP

 

40 

%

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

FP

 

60 

%

 

63 

%

 

61 

%

 

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

Revenue

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Fixed price

51 

%

 

47 

%

 

44 

%

Guaranteed maximum price

24 

%

 

28 

%

 

32 

%

Unit price

10 

%

 

11 

%

 

12 

%

Cost plus fee and other

15 

%

 

14 

%

 

12 

%



100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog as of

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

Cost Plus, GMP

 

33 

%

 

24 

%

FP

 

67 

%

 

76 

%

 

 

100 

%

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

Backlog

2017

 

2016

Fixed price

67 

%

 

63 

%

Guaranteed maximum price

12 

%

 

21 

%

Unit price

13 

%

 

%

Cost plus fee and other

%

 

10 

%



100 

%

 

100 

%



The Contract Process

We identify potential projects from a variety of sources, including from advertisements by federal, state and local government agencies, through the efforts of our business development personnel and through meetings with other participants in the construction industry, such as architects and engineers. After determining which projects are available, we make a decision on which projects to pursue based on factors such as project size, duration, availability of personnel, current backlog, competitive advantages and disadvantages, profitability expectations, prior experience, contracting agency or owner, source of project funding, geographic location and type of contract.

After deciding which contracts to pursue, we generally have to complete a prequalification process with the applicable agency or customer. The prequalification process generally limits bidders to those companies that the agencies or customer concludes have the operational experience and financial capability to effectively complete the particular project(s) in accordance with the plans, specifications and construction schedule.

Our estimating process typically involves three phases. Initially, we perform a detailed review of the plans and specifications, summarize the various types of work involved and related estimated quantities, determine the project duration or schedule, and highlight the unique aspects of and risks associated with the project. After the initial review, we decide whether to continue to pursue the project. If we elect to pursue the project, we perform the second phase of the estimating process, which consists of estimating the cost and availability of labor, material, equipment, subcontractors and the project team required to complete the project on time and in accordance with the plans and specifications. The final phase consists of a detailed review of the estimate by management including, among other things, assumptions regarding cost, approach, means and methods, productivity and risk. After the final review of the cost estimate, management adds an amount for profit to arrive at the total bid amount.

Public bids to various government agencies are generally awarded to the lowest bidder. Requests for proposals or negotiated contracts with public or private customers are generally awarded based on a combination of technical capability and price, taking into consideration factors such as project schedule and prior experience.



119

 


 

Table of Contents

 

DuringCompetition

While the construction phase of a project, we monitor our progress by comparing actual costs incurred and quantities completedmarkets include numerous competitors, especially for small to date with budgeted amounts and the project schedule and periodically, at a minimum on a quarterly basis, prepare an updated estimate of total forecasted revenue, cost and profit for the project.

During the ordinary course of mostmid-sized projects, the customer, and sometimes the contractor, initiate modifications or changes to the original contract to reflect, among other things, changes in specifications or design, construction method or manner of performance, facilities, equipment, materials, site conditions and period for completion of the work. Generally, the scope and price of these modifications are documented in a “change order” to the original contract and are reviewed, approved and paid in accordance with the normal change order provisions of the contract.

Often a contract requires us to perform extra, or change order, work as directed by the customer even if the customer has not agreed in advance on the scope or pricemuch of the work that we target is for larger, more complex projects where, typically, there are fewer active market participants due to be performed. This process may result in disputesthe greater capabilities and resources required to perform the work. Despite this, over whether the work performed is beyond the scope of the work includedpast several years we have seen increased competition, particularly from foreign competitors that have been pursuing major projects in the original project plansUnited States due to the relatively larger size and specifications or, if the customer agreessignificant number of U.S. opportunities. We anticipate that the work performed qualifies as extra work, the price the customer is willing to payincreased level of foreign competition will persist for the extra work. Even when the customer agrees to pay for the extra work, we may be required to fund the cost of such work for a lengthy period of time until the change order is approved and funded by the customer. Also, unapproved change orders, contract disputes or claims result in costs being incurred by us that cannot be billed currently and, therefore, are reflected as “costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 1 — Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, under the section entitled Method of Accounting for Contracts, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. In addition, any delay caused by the extra work may adversely impact the timely scheduling of other project work and our ability to meet specified contract milestone dates.foreseeable future.



In our Civil segment, we compete principally with large civil construction firms, including (alphabetically) Dragados USA; Fluor Corporation; Granite Construction; Kiewit Corporation; Skanska USA; Traylor Bros., Inc.; and The process for resolving claims varies from one contract to another, but, in general,Walsh Group. In our Building segment, we attempt to resolve claims at the project supervisory level through the normal change order process orcompete with higher levels of management within our organization and the customer’s organization. Depending upon the terms of the contract, claim resolution may involve a variety of other resolution methods, including mediation, binding or non-binding arbitration or litigation. Regardlessnational and regional contractors. Our primary competitors are (alphabetically) AECOM (through its acquisitions of the process,Tishman Construction and Hunt Construction Group); Balfour Beatty Construction; Clark Construction Group; DPR Construction; Gilbane, Inc.; Hensel Phelps Construction Co.; McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.; Skanska USA; Suffolk Construction; and Turner Construction Company. In our Specialty Contractors segment, we compete principally with various regional and local electrical, mechanical and plumbing subcontractors. We believe price, experience, reputation, responsiveness, customer relationships, project completion track record, schedule control, risk management and quality of work are key factors customers consider when a potential claim arises on a project, we typically have the contractual obligation to perform the work and incur the related costs. It is not uncommon for the claim resolution process to last months or years, especially if it involves litigation.awarding contracts.



There are a number of factors that can create variability in contract performance and results as compared to a project’s original bid. These include costs associated with added scope changes, extended overhead due to owner, weather, and other delays, subcontractor performance issues, changes in site conditions that differ from those assumed in the original bid, the availability and skill level of workers in the geographic location of the project, and a change in the availability and proximity of equipment or materials. In addition, certain efficiencies and cost savings may at times be realized during the course of a project compared to the originally anticipated costs and levels of productivity. Furthermore, our original bids for most contracts are based on the customer’s estimates of quantities needed to complete the contract. All of these factors can cause changes in estimates to a project’s at-completion costs, resulting in favorable or unfavorable impacts to profitability in current and future periods. Because of the rigor of our estimating process, we have often encountered opportunities to improve project performance cost estimates through realized project execution efficiencies and cost savings.

Our project contracts often involve work durations in excess of one year. Revenue from our contracts in process is generally recorded under the percentage of completion contract accounting method. For a more detailed discussion of our policy in these areas, see Note 1 — Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, under the section entitled Method of Accounting for Contracts, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

Construction Costs



While our business may experience some adverse consequences if shortages develop or ifIf prices for materials, labor or equipment increase excessively, provisions in certain types of contracts often shift all or a major portion of any adverse impact to the customer. OnIn our fixed price contracts, we attempt to insulate ourselves from the unfavorable effects of inflation, when possible, by incorporating escalating wage and price assumptions where appropriate, into our construction cost estimates, and by obtaining firm fixed price quotes from major subcontractors and material suppliers, at the time of the bid period, and when possible, by purchasing requiredentering into purchase commitments for materials early in the project schedule. Construction and other materials used in our construction activities are generally available locally from multiple sources and have been in adequate supply during recent years. Construction workLabor resources for our domestic projects are largely obtained through various labor unions. We have not experienced significant labor shortages in selected overseas areas primarily employsrecent years, nor do we expect to in the near future, though a significant, rapid growth in our backlog may lead to situations in which labor resources become constrained. We employ expatriate and local labor which can usually be obtained as required.in selected overseas areas.



Environmental Matters



Our properties and operations are subject to federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including requirements for water discharges,discharges; air emissions,emissions; the use, management and disposal of solid or hazardous materials or wasteswastes; and the cleanup of contamination. For example, we must apply water or chemicals to reduce dust on road

12


Table of Contents

construction projects and to contain contaminants in stormwater runoff at construction sites. In certain circumstances, we may also be required to hire subcontractors to dispose of hazardous materials encountered on a project in accordance with a plan approved in advance by the owner. We continually evaluate our compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, and believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicablethose laws and regulations and we continually evaluate whether we must take additional steps to ensure compliance with environmental laws; however,regulations. However, future requirements or amendments to current laws or regulations imposing more stringent requirements could require us to incur additional costs to maintain or achieve compliance.



In addition, some environmental laws, such as the U.S. federal “Superfund” law and similar state statutes, can impose liability for the entire cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former owners or operators or upon parties who generated waste at, or sent waste to, these sites, regardless of who owned the site at the time of the release or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity. Contaminants have been detected at some of the sites that we own orand where we have worked as a contractor in the past, and we have incurred costs for the investigation orand remediation of hazardous substances. We believe that our liabilityliabilities for these sites willare not be material, either individually or in the aggregate, andaggregate. We have pollution liability insurance availablecoverage for such matters. We believe thatmatters, and if applicable, we have minimal exposure to environmental liability because we generally carry insurance or receiveseek indemnification from customers to cover the risks associated with the remediation business.

We own real estate in several states and in Guam (see Item 2. Properties for a description of our major properties) and, as an owner, are subject to laws governing environmental responsibility and liability based on ownership. We are not aware of any significant environmental liability associated with our ownership of real estate.remediation.



Insurance and Bonding



All of our properties and equipment, both directly owned and owned throughas well as those of our joint ventures, with others, are covered by insurance and we believe that the amount and scope of such insurance is adequate for the risks we face. In addition, we maintain general liability, excess liability and workers’ compensation insurance in amounts that we believe are consistent with our risk of loss and industry practice. Our wholly owned subsidiary, PCR Insurance Company, issues policies for subcontractor default insurance, auto liability, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance, allowing us to centralize our claims and risk management functions to reduce our insurance-related costs.



As a normal part of the construction business, we are often required to provide various types of surety bonds as an additional level of security of our performance. We have surety arrangements with several sureties. We also require many of our higher-risk subcontractors to provide surety bonds as security for payment of subcontractors and suppliers and to guarantee their performance. Historically,As an alternative to traditional surety bonds, we also have purchased contractsubcontractor default insurance onfor certain construction projects to insure against the risk of subcontractor default as opposed to having subcontractors provide traditional payment and performance bonds. In 2008, we formed PCR Insurance Company, a wholly owned subsidiary, to consolidate the risk under our various insurance policies utilizing deductible reimbursement policies issued by PCR Insurance Company, for each of our subsidiaries’ contractor default insurance, auto liability, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance exposure. The formation of PCR Insurance Company has allowed us to take advantage of favorable tax opportunities, and to centralize our claims and risk management functions, thus reducing claims and insurance-related costs.default.



10


Table of Contents

Employees



The total number of personnel employed by us is subject to seasonal fluctuations,our employees varies based on the volume of construction in progress and the relative amount of work performed by subcontractors. Our average number of full-time equivalent employees during 2014 was 10,532,active projects, the type and magnitude of those projects, as well as our position within the lifecycle of those projects. Our total number of employees atas of December 31, 20142017 was 10,939.  The increase in the average from 9,679 in 2013 to 10,532 in 2014 is primarily due to business growth and normal fluctuation in job timing.10,061.



We are signatory to numerous local and regional collective bargaining agreements, both directly and through trade associations, as a union contractor. These agreements cover all necessary union crafts and are subject to various renewal dates. Estimated amounts for wage escalation related to the expiration of union contracts are included in our bids on various projects and, as a result,projects; accordingly, the expiration of any union contract in the next fiscal year is not expected to have any material impact on us. As of December 31, 2014,  approximately 7,145 of our total of 10,939 employees were union employees. During the past several years, we have not experienced any significant work stoppages caused by our union employees.



Financial information about geographic areas is discussed in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading “Geographic Information.”

Available Information



Our website address is http://www.tutorperini.com. The information contained onIn the “Investor Relations” portion of our website, is not included as a partunder “Financial Reports,” subsection “SEC Filings,” you may obtain free electronic copies of or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make available, free of charge on our website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our10‑Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to suchthose reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as soonwell as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed such materials with, or furnished them to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC Headquarters, Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy, information

13


Table of Contents

statements and other information regarding issuers, such as the Company, that file electronically with the SEC. Also available on our website are our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of the Committees of our Board of Directors and reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act of transactions in our stock by our directors and executiveexecutive officers. These reports are made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports, and any amendments to them, are also available at the Internet website of the SEC, www.sec.gov. The public may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. In order to obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room, you may call 1-800-732-0330. We also maintain various documents, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of the Committees of our Board of Directors in the “Corporate Governance” portion of our website.

  

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS



We are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our operations. Set forth below, and elsewhere in this report, and in other documents we file with the SEC are descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Additional risks we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also affect our business operations. These risksreport and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.



If we are unable to accurately estimate contract risks, revenue or costs, the timing of new awards, or the pace of project execution, we may incur a loss or achieve lower than anticipated profit.

Accounting for contract-related revenue and costs requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that may change significantly throughout the project lifecycle, which could result in a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. In addition, cost overruns on fixed price and GMP contracts may result in lower profits or losses.Our results of operations can also fluctuate quarterly and annually depending on when new awards occur and the commencement and progress of work on projects already awarded.

Our contracts require us to perform extra, or change order, work, which can result in disputes or claims and adversely affect our working capital, profits and cash flows.

Our contracts generally require us to perform extra, or change order, work as directed by the customer even if the customer has not agreed in advance on the scope and/or price of the work to be performed. This process may result in disputes or claims over whether the work performed is beyond the scope of work directed by the customer and/or exceeds the price the customer is willing to pay for the work performed. To the extent we do not recover our costs for this work or there are delays in the recovery of these costs, our cash flows and working capital could be adversely impacted.

We are subject to significant legal proceedings which, if determined adversely to us, could harm our reputation, preclude us from bidding on future projects and/or have a material effect on us. We also may invest significant working capital on projects while legal proceedings are being settled.

We are involved in various lawsuits, including the legal proceedings described under Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Litigation is inherently uncertain, and it is not possible to accurately predict what the final outcome will be of any legal proceeding. We must make certain assumptions and rely on estimates, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, regarding potential outcomes of legal proceedings in order to determine an appropriate contingent liability and charge to income. Any result that is materially different than our estimates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of

11


Table of Contents

operations and cash flows. In addition, any adverse judgments could harm our reputation and preclude us from bidding on future projects.

We occasionally bring claims against project owners for additional cost exceeding the contract price or for amounts not included in the original contract price. When these types of events occur and unresolved claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of claims could have a material effect on our liquidity and financial results.

A significant slowdown or decline in economic conditions could adversely affect our operations.

Any significant decline in economic conditions in any of the markets we serve or uncertainty regarding the economic outlook, could result in a decline in demand for infrastructure projects and commercial building developments. In addition, any instability in the financial and credit markets could negatively impact our customers’ ability to pay us on a timely basis, or at all, for work on projects already under construction, could cause our customers to delay or cancel construction projects in our backlog or could create difficulties for customers to obtain adequate financing to fund new construction projects. Such consequences could have an adverse impact on our future operating results. Lastly, we are more susceptible to adverse economic conditions in New York and California, as a significant portion of our operations are concentrated in those states.

Competition for new project awards is intense, and our failure to compete effectively could reduce our market share and profits.

New project awards are determined through either a competitive bid basis or on a negotiated basis. Projects may be awarded based solely upon price, but often take into account other factors, such as technical qualifications, proposed project team, schedule and past performance on similar projects. Within our industry, we compete with many international, regional and local construction firms. Some of these competitors have achieved greater market penetration than we have in the markets in which we compete, and some have greater resources than we do. If we are unable to compete successfully in such markets, our relative market share and profits could be reduced.

We may not fully realize the revenue value reported in our backlog.backlog due to cancellations or reductions in scope.



As of December 31, 2014,2017, our backlog of uncompleted construction work was approximately $7.8$7.3 billion. We include a construction project in our backlog at such time as a contract is awarded, or a letter of commitment is obtained and adequate construction funding is in place. The revenue projected in our backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits. For example, if a project reflected in our backlog is terminated, suspendedthe cancellation or reducedreduction in scope it would result in a reduction to our backlog which could reduce, potentially to a material extent, the revenues and profits realized. If a customer cancels a project, we may be reimbursed forof certain costs and profit thereon but typically have no contractual right to the total revenues reflected in our backlog. Significant cancellations or delays of projects in our backlog could have a material adverse effect on future revenues, profits,our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.



AOur actual results could differ from the assumptions and estimates used to prepare our financial statements.

In preparing our financial statements, we are required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) to make estimates and assumptions as of the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring significant slowdownestimates by our management include, but are not limited to:

• recognition of contract revenue, costs, profits or declinelosses in economic conditionsapplying the principles of percentage-of-completion accounting;

• recognition of revenue related to project incentives or awards we expect to receive;

• recognition of recoveries under contract change orders or claims;

• estimated amounts for expected project losses, warranty costs, contract close-out or other costs;

• collectability of billed and unbilled accounts receivable;

• asset valuations;

• income tax provisions and related valuation allowances;

• determination of expense and potential liabilities under pension and other post-retirement benefit programs; and

• accruals for other estimated liabilities, including litigation and insurance revenue/reserves.

Our actual business and financial results could differ from our estimates of such results, which could have a material negative impact on our financial condition and reported results of operations.

The construction services industry is highly schedule driven, and our failure to meet the schedule requirements of our contracts could adversely affect our operations.reputation and/or expose us to financial liability.



Although economic conditions in the United States have gradually improved over the past two years following several challenging years during the aftermathMany of the global economic downturn in 2008, any significant slowdown or decline in economic conditionsour contracts are subject to specific completion schedule requirements. Any failure to meet contractual schedule requirements could result in renewed demand uncertainty across various partssubject us to liquidated damages, liability for our customer’s actual cost arising out of the country, particularly for new commercial building developments or renovationsour delay and damage to existing infrastructure. In addition, any renewed tightness in the financial and credit markets could create difficulties for some customers, including certain private owners and state and local governments, to obtain adequate financing to fund new construction projects on satisfactory terms or at all. These financing difficulties may significantly increase the rate at which our customers defer, delay, or cancel proposed new construction projects. Such deferrals, delays or cancellations could have an adverse impact on our future operating results.reputation.



Any renewed instability or worsening conditions in the financial and credit markets could also impact a customer’s ability to pay us on a timely basis, or at all, for work on projects already under construction in accordance with the contract terms. Customer financing may be subject to periodic renewals and extensions of credit by the lender. If credit markets tighten and challenging economic conditions return, lenders may become unwilling to continue renewing or extending credit to a customer. Such deferral, delay or cancellation of credit by the lender could impact the customer’s ability to pay us, which could have an adverse impact on our future operating results. A significant portion of our operations are concentrated in California and New York. As a result, we are more susceptible to fluctuations caused by adverse economic or other conditions in these states compared to others.

12

 


Reductions in the level

Table of consumer spending within the non-residential building industry and theContents

The level of federal, state and local government spending for infrastructure and other public projects could adversely affect the number of projects available to us in the future.



With regard to the non-residential building industry, consumer spending is discretionary and may decline during economic downturns when consumers have less disposable income. Even an uncertain economic outlook may adversely affect consumer and private industry spending in various business operations, as consumers may spend less in anticipation of a potential economic downturn. Decreased spending in the non-residential building markets could deter new projects within the industry and the expansion or renovation of existing facilities.

With regard to infrastructure and other public works spending,The civil construction and public-works building markets are dependent on the amount of infrastructure work funded by various government agencies, which in turn, depends on many factors, including the condition of the existing infrastructure and buildings; the need for new or expanded infrastructure and buildings; and federal, state orand local government spending levels. A slowdownAs a result, our future operating results could be negatively impacted by any decrease in economic activity in any of the markets that we serve may result in less spending ondemand for public works projects. In addition, aprojects or decrease or delay in government funding, which could result from a variety of infrastructure projects orfactors, including delays in the sale of voter-approved bonds, could decrease the number of civil construction projects available and limit our ability to obtain new contracts, which could reduce revenues within our Civil segment. In addition, budget shortfalls, and credit rating downgrades in states in which the Company is involved in significant infrastructure projects and anyor long-term impairment in the ability of state and local governments to finance construction projects by raisingraise capital in the municipal bond market could curtail or delay the funding of future projects. Our Building segment is also involved in significant public works construction projects including healthcare facilities, educational facilities, and municipal and government facilities

14


Table of Contents

primarily in California and the southeastern United States. These projects also are dependent upon funding by various federal, state and local government agencies. A decrease in government funding of public healthcare and education facilities, particularly in those regions, could decrease the number and/or size of construction projects available and limit our ability to obtain new contracts in these markets, which could reduce our revenues and earnings.

Economic, political and other risks and the level of U.S. Government funding associated with our international operations could adversely affect our revenues and earnings.

We derived approximately 4% or $168.8 million of revenues and approximately $27.7 million of income from construction operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 from our work on projects located outside of the United States, including projects in Afghanistan, Guam, and the Philippine Islands. Our international operations expose us to risks inherent in doing business in certain hostile regions outside the United States, including: political risks, risks of loss due to civil disturbances, guerilla activities and insurrection; acts of terrorism and acts of war; unstable economic, financial and market conditions; potential incompatibility with foreign subcontractors and vendors; foreign currency controls and fluctuations; trade restrictions; logistical challenges; variations in taxes; and changes in labor conditions, labor strikes and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations. Failure to successfully manage risks associated with our international operations could result in higher operating costs than anticipated or could delay or limit our ability to generate revenues and income from construction operations in key international markets.

The U.S. federal government has approved various spending bills for the construction of defense- and diplomacy-related projects and has allocated significant funds to the defense of U.S. interests around the world from the threat of terrorism. The federal government has also approved funds for development in conjunction with the relocation of military personnel into Guam. However, federal government funding levels for construction projects in the Middle East have decreased significantly over the past few years as the U.S. government has reduced the number of military troops and support personnel in the region. As a result, we have seen a decrease in the number and size of federal government projects available to us in this region. Any decrease in federal government funding for projects in Guam or in other countries in which we are pursuing work may result in project delays or cancellations, which could reduce our revenues and earnings.

Competition for new project awards is intense and our failure to compete effectively could reduce our market share and profits.

New project awards are often determined through either a competitive bid basis or on a negotiated basis. Bid or negotiated contracts with public or private owners are generally awarded based upon price, but oftentimes take into account other factors, such as technical approach and/or qualifications, shorter project schedules, or our record of past performance on similar projects completed. Within our industry, we compete with many national, regional and local construction firms. Some of these competitors have achieved greater market penetration than we have in the markets in which we compete, and some have greater financial and other resources than we do. As a result, we may need to accept lower contract margins or more fixed price or unit price contracts in order for us to compete against competitors that have the ability to accept awards at lower prices or have a pre-existing relationship with the customer. If we are unable to compete successfully in such markets, our relative market share and profits could be reduced.

The construction services industry is highly schedule driven, and our failure to meet schedule requirements of our contracts could adversely affect our reputation and/or expose us to financial liability.

Many of our contracts are subject to specific completion schedule requirements and subject us to liquidated damages in the event the construction schedules are not achieved. Our failure to meet schedule requirements could subject us not only to liquidated damages, but could further subject us to liability for our customer’s actual cost arising out of our delay and cause us to suffer damage to our reputation within our industry and customer base.

We will require substantial personnel, including construction and project managers and specialty subcontractor resources to execute and perform on our contracts in backlog. The successful execution of our business strategies is also dependent upon our ability to attract, retain, and implement succession plans for key officers.

Our ability to execute and perform on our contracts in backlog depends in large part upon our ability to hire and retain highly skilled personnel, including project and construction management. In addition, our construction projects require significant trade labor resources, such as carpenters, masons and other skilled workers, as well as certain specialty subcontractor skills. In the event we are unable to attract, hire and retain the requisite personnel and subcontractors necessary to execute and perform on our contract backlog, we may experience delays in completing projects in accordance with project schedules, which may have a material effect on our financial results and harm our reputation. Further, the increased demand for personnel and specialty subcontractors may result in higher than expected costs, which could cause us to exceed the budget on a project. This, in turn, may have a material effect on our results of operations and harm our relationships with our customers. In addition, if we lack the personnel and specialty subcontractors necessary to perform on our current contract backlog, we may find it necessary to curtail our pursuit of new projects. Although this

15


Table of Contents

risk has been somewhat mitigated through the specialty contracting capabilities which we acquired in 2011, we still rely significantly on external specialty subcontractors to perform our projects.

The execution of our business strategies also substantially depends on our ability to retain the continued service of several key members of our management. Losing the services of these key officers could adversely affect our business until a suitable replacement can be found. The majority of these key officers are not bound by employment agreements with us nor do we maintain key person life insurance policies for them.

Volatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price and the overall markets may adversely affect our ability to retain key staff who have received equity compensation. Additionally, because a substantial portion of our key executives' compensation is placed "at risk" and linked to the performance of our business, when our operating results are negatively impacted, we are at a competitive disadvantage for retaining and hiring key executives and managers compared to other companies that may pay a relatively higher fixed salary. If we lose our existing key executives or managers or are unable to hire and integrate new key executives or managers, or if we fail to implement succession plans for our key executives, our operating results would likely be harmed.

Weather can significantly affect our revenues and profitability.

Our ability to perform work is significantly affected by weather conditions such as precipitation and temperature. Changes in weather conditions can cause delays and otherwise significantly affect our project costs. The impact of weather conditions can result in variability in our revenues and profitability.market.



Our participation in construction joint ventures exposes us to liability and/or harm to our reputation for failures by our partners.



As part of our business, we enter into joint venture arrangements typically to jointly bid on and execute particular projects, thereby reducing our risk profile while enhancing the execution capability and financial or operational risk with respect to such projects.reward of project teams. Success on these joint projects depends in large part on whether our joint venture partners satisfy their contractual obligations. WeGenerally, we and our joint venture partners are generally jointly and severally liable for all liabilities and obligations of our joint ventures. If a joint venture partner fails to perform or is financially unable to bear its portion of required capital contributions or other obligations, including liabilities stemming from lawsuits, we could be required to make additional investments, provide additional services or pay more than our proportionate share of a liability to make up for our partner’s shortfall. Further, if we are unable to adequately address our partner’s performance issues, the customer may terminate the project, which could result in legal liability to us, harm our reputation, reduce our profit on a project or, in some cases, result in a loss.



We are subjectrequire substantial personnel, including construction and project managers and specialty subcontractor resources to significant legal proceedings which, if determined adverselyexecute and perform our contracts in backlog. The successful execution of our business strategies is also dependent upon our ability to us, could harmattract and retain our reputation, preclude us from bidding on future projects and/or have a material effect on us. We also may invest significant working capital on projects while legal proceedings are being settled.

We are involved in various lawsuits, including the legal proceedings described under Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Litigation is inherently uncertain and it is not possible to accurately predict what the final outcome will be of any legal proceeding. We must make certain assumptions and rely on estimates regarding potential outcomes of legal proceedings in order to determine an appropriate charge to income and contingent liabilities. Estimating and recording future outcomes of litigation proceedings requires us to make significant judgments and assumptions about the future, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. If the final recovery turns out to be materially less favorable than our estimates, we would have to record the related liability, which may include losses from money owed pursuant to an unfavorable judgmentkey officers, as well as losses basedadequately plan for their succession.

Our ability to execute and perform on our contracts in backlog depends in large part upon our ability to hire and retain highly skilled personnel, including project and construction management and trade labor resources, such as carpenters, masons and other skilled workers. In the failureevent we are unable to receiveattract, hire and retain the requisite personnel and subcontractors necessary to execute and perform our backlog, we may experience delays in completing projects in accordance with project schedules or an anticipated judgment for sumsincrease in our favor, and fund the paymentexpected costs, both of the judgment and, if such adverse judgment is significant, itwhich could have a material adverse effect on us. Legal proceedings resulting in judgments or findings against us may harmour financial results, our reputation and prospects for futureour relationships. In addition, if we lack the personnel and specialty subcontractors necessary to perform on our current contract awards. We occasionally bring claims against project owners for additional cost exceeding the contract price or for amounts not included in the original contract price. When these types of events occur and unresolved claims are pending,backlog, we may investfind it necessary to curtail our pursuit of new projects. A significant, working capitalrapid growth in projectsour backlog may lead to cover cost overruns pendingsituations in which labor resources become constrained.

The execution of our business strategies also substantially depends on our ability to retain several key members of our management. Losing any of these individuals could adversely affect our business. The majority of these key officers are not bound by employment agreements. Volatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key staff to whom we have provided share-based compensation. Additionally, because a substantial portion of our key executives' compensation is placed "at risk" and linked to the resolutionperformance of the relevant claims. A failureour business, when our operating results are negatively impacted, we are at greater risk of employee turnover. If we lose our key executives and do not have qualified successors in place, our operating results would likely be harmed.

Systems and information technology interruption and breaches in data security could adversely impact our ability to promptly recoveroperate and negatively impact our operating results.

We are reliant on these typescomputer and other information technology that could be interrupted or damaged by a variety of claimsfactors including, but not limited to, cyber-attacks, natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, acts of war, computer viruses and physical damage. The resulting consequences could include a loss of critical data, a delay in operations or an unintentional disclosure of confidential information, any of which could have a material effect onimpact to our liquidityCompany and its consolidated financial statements.

We dedicate considerable attention and resources to the safeguarding of our information technology systems. Our systems may, nevertheless, continue to be at risk for cyber-attacks. Consequently, we may need to engage significant resources in the future to remediate the impact of, or further mitigate the risk of, such an attack. Any successful cyber-attack could result in the criminal, or otherwise illegitimate use of, confidential data, including the Company’s data or third-party data for which the Company has the responsibility for safekeeping. Additionally, such an attack could adversely affect our operations, reputation and financial results.

Our contracts require us to perform extra, or change order, work, which can result in disputes and adversely affect our working capital, profits and cash flows.

Our contracts generally require us to perform extra, or change order, work as directed by the customer even if the customer has not agreed in advance on the scope or price of the work to be performed. This process can result in disputes over whether the work performed is beyond the scope of the work included in the original project plans and specifications or, if the customer agrees that the work performed qualifies as extra work, over the price the customer is willing to pay for the extra work. Even when the customer agrees to pay for the extra work, we may be required to fund the cost of such work for a lengthy period of time until the change order is approved and funded by the customer.

1613

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Also, unapproved change orders, contract disputes or claims cause us to incur costs that cannot be billed currently and therefore may be reflected as “costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings” in our balance sheet. See Note1 — Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, under the section entitled Method of Accounting for Contracts of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. To the extent our actual recoveries with respect to unapproved change orders, contract disputes or claims are lower than our estimates, the amount of any shortfall will reduce our revenues and the amount of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings recorded on our balance sheet, and could have a material effect on our working capital, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, as we include unapproved change orders in our estimates of revenues and costs to complete a project, our profitability may be diluted via the percentage-of- completion method of accounting for contract revenues. Any delay caused by the extra work may also adversely impact the timely scheduling of other project work and our ability to meet specified contract milestone dates.

The percentage-of-completion method of accounting for contract revenues involved significant estimates which may result in material adjustments, which could result in a charge against our earnings.

We recognize contract revenues using the percentage-of-completion method. Under this method, estimated contract revenues are recognized by applying the percentage of completion of the project for the period to the total estimated revenues for the contract. Estimated contract losses are recognized in full when determined. Total contract revenues and cost estimates are reviewed and revised at a minimum on a quarterly basis as the work progresses and as change orders are approved. Adjustments based upon the percentage of completion are reflected in contract revenues in the period when these estimates are revised. To the extent that these adjustments result in an increase or a reduction in or an elimination of previously reported contract profit, we recognize a credit or a charge against current earnings, as applicable. Such credits or charges could be material and could cause our results to fluctuate materially from period to period.

Accounting for our contract related revenues and costs, as well as other expenses, require management to make a variety of significant estimates and assumptions. Although we believe we have the experience and processes to enable us to formulate appropriate assumptions and produce reasonably dependable estimates, these assumptions and estimates may change significantly in the future and could result in the reversal of previously recognized revenue and profit. Such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

If we are unable to accurately estimate the overall risks, revenues or costs on a contract, we may achieve a lower than anticipated profit or incur a loss on that contract.

We generally enter into three principal types of contracts with our customers: fixed price contracts, guaranteed maximum price contracts and cost plus fee contracts. We derive a significant portion of our Civil and Specialty Contractors segment revenues and backlog from fixed price contracts.

Cost overruns, whether due to inefficiency, faulty estimates or other factors, result in lower profit or even a loss on a project. If our estimates of the overall risks, revenues or costs prove inaccurate or circumstances change, we may incur a lower profit or a loss on that contract.



We are subject to a number of risks as a U.S. government contractor, which could harm our reputation, result in fines or penalties against us and/or adversely impact our financial condition.



We are a provider of servicesFailure to U.S. government agencies and therefore are exposed to risks associatedcomply with government contracting. We must observe laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of government contracts which affect how we do business with our U.S. government customers and may impose added costs on our business. For example, the Federal Acquisition Regulations allow our U.S. government customers to terminate our contracts for the failure to comply with regulatory requirements not directly related to performance and in certain cases, require us to disclose and certify cost and pricing data in connection with contract negotiations.

Our failure to comply with these or other laws and regulationsgovernment contracts could result in contract terminations,termination, suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. government, civil fines and damages and criminal prosecution, and penalties, any of which could causehave a material impact on our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.consolidated financial statements and future financial condition and performance.



Our pension plan is underfundedWe have a substantial amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial position and we may be required to make significant future contributions to the plan.prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our debt agreements.



Our defined benefit pension planWe currently have, and our supplemental retirement plan are non-contributory pension plans covering manyexpect to continue to have, a substantial amount of our employees. Benefits under these plans were frozen as of June 1, 2004.indebtedness. As of December 31, 2014, these plans were underfunded by approximately $35.02017, we had total debt of $736.3 million. WeIf we are requiredunable to make cash contributions to our pension and supplemental retirement plans tomeet the extent necessaryterms of the financial covenants or fail to comply with minimum funding requirements imposedany of the other restrictions contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness, an event of default could occur, causing the debt related to such agreement to become immediately due. If such acceleration occurs, we may not be able to repay such indebtedness as required. Since indebtedness under our 2017 Credit Facility is secured by employee benefitsubstantially all of our assets, acceleration of this debt could result in foreclosure of those assets and tax laws. Thea negative impact on our operations. In addition, a failure to meet the terms of our 2017 Credit Facility could result in a reduction of future borrowing capacity under the 2017 Credit Facility, causing a loss of liquidity. A loss of liquidity could adversely impact our ability to execute projects in our backlog, obtain new projects, engage subcontractors, and attract and retain key employees.

Conversion of our outstanding Convertible Notes could dilute ownership interests of existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.

Based on the terms of the indenture for the Convertible Notes, we may redeem the Convertible Notes in cash, shares of our Common Stock or a combination of the two. As a result, a conversion of some or all of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of our Common Stock issuable upon such conversion of the Convertible Notes could cause the price of our Common Stock to decline. In addition, the existence of the Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because a conversion of the Convertible Notes could depress the price of our Common Stock.

We may need to include the potential dilutive impact of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation.

We currently intend to pay the principal amount of anyour Convertible Notes in cash; therefore, we have not included the potential dilutive effect of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculations. If, however, there is a change in future circumstances as a result of a decline in our projected cash flow, available cash/liquidity or other reasons, we may conclude at such time that it will be preferable to use shares to satisfy the Convertible Notes. Such a change in our intentions would result in the inclusion of the potential dilutive impact of the Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation, which would result in a decrease in our diluted earnings per share.

Weather can significantly affect our revenue and profitability.

Inclement weather conditions, such as significant storms and unusual temperatures, can impact our ability to perform work. Adverse weather conditions can cause delays and increases in project costs, resulting in variability in our revenue and profitability.

Our international operations expose us to economic, political and other risks, as well as uncertainty related to U.S. Government funding, which could adversely affect our revenue and earnings. In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, we derived approximately $143.6 million of revenue from our work on projects located outside of the United States. Our international operations expose us to risks inherent in doing business in certain hostile regions outside the United States, including political risks; risks of loss due to acts of war; unstable economic, financial and market conditions; potential incompatibility with foreign subcontractors and vendors; foreign currency controls and fluctuations; trade restrictions; logistical challenges; variations in taxes; and changes in labor conditions, labor strikes and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations. Failure to successfully manage risks associated with our international operations could result in higher operating costs than anticipated or could delay or limit our ability to generate revenue and income from construction operations in key international markets.

The U.S. federal government has approved various spending bills for the construction of defense- and diplomacy-related projects and has allocated significant funds to the defense of U.S. interests around the world from the threat of terrorism. The federal government has also approved funds for development in conjunction with the relocation of military personnel into Guam. However, federal government funding levels for construction projects in the Middle East have decreased significantly over the past several years as the

1714

 


 

Table of Contents

 

required contributionsU.S. government has reduced the number of military troops and support personnel in the region. As a result, we have seen a decrease in the number and size of federal government projects available to us in this region. Any decrease in U.S. federal government funding for projects in Guam or in other U.S. Territories or countries in which we are pursuing work may result in project delays or cancellations, which could reduce our revenue and earnings.

Finally, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. While our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, there is determined basedno assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from circumstances or actions that could result in possible criminal penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment and loss of reputation, any of which could have a material adverse impact on an annual actuarial valuationour business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our chairman and chief executive officer could exert influence over the Company due to his position and significant ownership interest.

As of December 31, 2017, our chairman and chief executive officer, Ronald N. Tutor, and three trusts controlled by Mr. Tutor (the “Tutor Group”) owned approximately 18% of the plan as performedoutstanding shares of our Common Stock. Additionally, one of our current directors was appointed by the plans’ actuaries. During 2014, we contributed $5.2 million in cashMr. Tutor pursuant to his right to nominate one member to our defined benefit pension plan and supplemental retirement plan. The amountBoard of Directors, so long as the Tutor Group owns at least 11.25% of the outstanding shares of our future contributions will depend upon asset returns, then-current discount ratesCommon Stock. Accordingly, Mr. Tutor could exert influence over the outcome of a range of corporate matters, including the election of directors and a numberthe approval or rejection of other factors, and,extraordinary transactions, such as a result,takeover attempt or sale of the amount we may electCompany or be required to contribute to these plans in the future may vary significantly. See Item 7. - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations- in the section entitled Critical Accounting Policies.its assets.



In connection with mergers and acquisitions, we have recorded goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and adversely affect our operating results. Assessing whether impairment has occurred requires us to make significant judgments and assumptions about the future, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and if actual events turn out to be materially less favorable than the judgments we make and the assumptions we use, we may be required to record additional impairmentsimpairment charges in the future.



We had approximately $685.3$635.4 million of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet atas of December 31, 2014. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations reduced by any impairments recorded subsequent to the date of acquisition.2017. We test goodwill and intangibleassess these assets for impairment by applyingannually, or more often if required. Our assessments involve a fair value test in the fourth quarternumber of each yearestimates and between annual tests if events or circumstances change which suggestassumptions that the goodwill or intangible assets should be evaluated. For example, if our market capitalization drops significantly below the amountare inherently subjective, require significant judgment and regard highly uncertain matters that are subject to change. The use of net equity recorded on our balance sheet, it might indicate a decline in the fair value of our goodwill and intangible assets and would require us to further evaluate whether impairment has occurred. If we determine that there has been an impairment (meaning that carrying value exceeds fair value), we would be required to write down the carrying value by the amount of the excess (which would represent the impaired portion of these assets).

Impairment assessment inherently involves management judgments as to the assumptions used to project amounts included in the valuation process and as to anticipated future market conditions and their potential effect on future performance. Changes indifferent assumptions or estimates cancould materially affect the determination of fair value. If we determine, based on our assumptions, judgments, estimates and projections, that noas to whether or not an impairment exists as of a specific date, andhas occurred. In addition, if future events turn out to be materiallyare less favorable than what we assumed or estimated in assessing fair value when we tested forour impairment analysis, we may be required atto record impairment charge, which could have a future date (either as part of a subsequent annual evaluation or on an interim basis) to re-evaluate fair value and to recognize an impairment at that time and write down the carrying value of our goodwill and/or intangible assets. If we were required to write down all or a significant part of our goodwill and intangible assets in future periods, our net earnings and equity could be materially and adversely affected.

The forecasts utilized in the discounted cash flow analysis as part of our impairment test assume future revenue and profitability growth in each of our segments. If our operating segments cannot obtain, or we determine at a later date that we no longer expect them to obtain, the projected levels of profitability, future goodwill impairment tests may also result in an impairment charge. There can be no assurances that our operating segments will be able to achieve our estimated levels of profitability. A number of factors, many of which we have no ability to control, could affect our financial condition, operating results and business prospects and could cause our actual results to differ from the estimates and assumptions we employed in our goodwill impairment testing. These factors include, but are not limited to; (i) renewed deterioration in the overall economy; (ii) a significant decline in our stock price and resulting market capitalization; (iii) changes in the discount rate; (iv) successful efforts by our competitors to gain market share in our markets; (v) adverse changes as a result of regulatory actions; (vi) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the overall business climate; (vii) recognition of a goodwill impairment loss in the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of our reporting units; and (viii) the resolution of legal proceedings resulting in judgments less favorable than our estimates. Given these and other factors, we cannot be certain that goodwill impairment will not be required during future periods.

Basedmaterial impact on our annual review of our goodwill and intangible assets, which we performed in the fourth quarter of 2014, we concluded that no impairment had occurred. To the extent that the value of the goodwill or other intangible assets becomes impaired in the future, we will be required to incur non-cash charges relating to the impairment and recognized them in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.consolidated financial statements.



Conflicts of interest may arise involving certain of our directors.

We have engaged in joint ventures, primarily in civil construction, with O&G Industries, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, whose Vice Chairman is Raymond R. Oneglia, one of our directors. In accordance with the Company’s policy, the terms of this joint venture and any of our joint ventures with any affiliate have been and will continue to be subject to review and approval by our Audit Committee. As in any joint venture, we could have disagreements with our joint venture partner over the operation of a joint venture, or a joint venture could be involved in disputes with third parties, where we may or may not have a conflict of interest with our joint venture partner. These relationships also may create conflicts of interest with respect to new business and other corporate opportunities.

As of December 31, 2014, our chairman and chief executive officer, Ronald N. Tutor and two trusts controlled by Mr. Tutor (the “Tutor Group”) owned approximately 17.3% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Under the terms of Mr. Tutor’s employment agreement, he has the right to designate one nominee for election as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors so

18


Table of Contents

long as the Tutor Group owns at least 11.25% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. As of the date of this Form 10-K, there are eleven current directors, one of whom was appointed by Mr. Tutor in November 2013. Mr. Tutor will be able to exert significant influence over the outcome of a range of corporate matters, including significant corporate transactions requiring a shareholder vote, such as a merger or a sale of the Company or its assets. This concentration of ownership and influence in management and Board decision-making also could harm the price of our common stock by, among other things, discouraging a potential acquirer from seeking to acquire shares of our common stock (whether by making a tender offer or otherwise) or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company.

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our debt agreements, in particular under our $300 million senior unsecured notes and our $250 million term loan under our revolving credit facility.

We currently have and expect to continue to have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2014, we had a total debt of $865.4 million, consisting of $298.8 million of senior unsecured notes (net of unamortized debt discount of $1.2 million) (the “Senior Notes”), $130.0 million of outstanding borrowings on a revolving credit basis (the “Revolving Facility”), a $250 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) which has been paid down to $242.5 million at December 31, 2014, and $194.1 million of other debt. We may also incur significant additional indebtedness in the future.

Our Senior Notes and revolving credit facility impose operating and financial restrictions on us and limit our ability to incur indebtedness from other sources without consent. Our revolving credit facility contains financial covenants that require us to maintain minimum fixed charge coverage and maximum consolidated leverage ratios. Our ability to borrow funds for any purpose is dependent upon satisfying these tests.

If we are unable to meet the terms of the financial covenants or fail to comply with any of the other restrictions contained in these agreements, an event of default could occur. An event of default, if not waived by our lenders, could result in an acceleration of any outstanding indebtedness, causing such debt to become immediately due and payable. If such acceleration occurs, we may not be able to repay such indebtedness on a timely basis. Since indebtedness under our revolving credit facility and Senior Notes is secured by substantially all of our assets, acceleration of this debt could result in foreclosure of those assets. In the event of a foreclosure, we would be unable to conduct our business and may be forced to discontinue ongoing operations.

Systems and information technology interruption and breaches in data security could adversely impact our ability to operate and our operating results.

We are reliant on computer and information technology and systems to properly operate. From time to time, we experience system interruptions and delays. If we are unable to add required software and hardware, effectively upgrade our systems and network infrastructure, and take other steps to improve the efficiency of and protect our systems, systems operation could be interrupted or delayed, or data security could be breached. If any of our key software vendors discontinue further development, integration, or long-term software maintenance support for our systems, or there is any significant system interruption, delay, breach of security, loss of data, or loss of a vendor, we may need to migrate our data to other systems. In addition, our systems and operations could be damaged or interrupted by natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, acts of war or terrorism, acts of God, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, and similar events or disruptions, including breaches by computer hackers and cyber-terrorists. Any of these or other events could cause loss of critical data, delay or prevent operations, or result in the unintentional disclosure of information. While management has taken steps to address these concerns by implementing state-of-the-art network and end-point security, internal control measures, and redundant backups of key data, a system failure or loss or data security breach could materially adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS



None.

1915

 


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES



Properties used in our construction operations primarily consist ofWe have office space within general, commercial office buildings in major cities as well as storagefacilities and equipment yards for our construction equipment. We believe our properties are well maintained, in good condition, adequate and suitable for our purposes.

Our major facilities are in the following locations:locations, which we believe are suitable and adequate for our current needs:













 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Offices

Business Segment(s)

 

Owned or Leased by Tutor Perini

 

Framingham, MA

Building

Owned

Business Segment(s)

Henderson, NV

Building

Owned

Houston, TX

Specialty Contractors

Owned

Sylmar,Los Angeles (Sylmar), CA

Corporate

 

Leased

 

Redwood City, CA

Building

Leased

Ozone Park, NY

Corporate, Civil & Specialty Contractors

Leased

Bronx, NY

Specialty Contractors

Leased

Gulfport , MS

Building

Owned

Mt. Vernon, NY

Specialty Contractors

Leased

Sylmar, CA

Civil

Owned

New Rochelle, NY

Civil

Owned

Peekskill, NY

Civil

Owned

Evansville, IN

Civil

Owned

Barrigada, Guam

 

CivilOwned

 

Owned

Sylmar, CA

Specialty Contractors

Owned

Civil

Black River Falls, WI

 

Owned

Civil

Evansville, IN

 

Owned

 

Civil

Fort Lauderdale, FL

 

BuildingLeased

 

LeasedBuilding & Specialty Contractors

Framingham, MA

 

Owned

Building

Orlando, FLGulfport, MS

Owned

Building

Henderson, NV

Owned

Building & Specialty Contractors

Houston, TX

Owned

 

Specialty Contractors

Jessup, MD

 

LeasedOwned

 

Civil

Lakeview Terrace, CA

 

Leased

Specialty Contractors

Mount Vernon, NY

 

Leased

 

Specialty Contractors

Jessup, MD

CivilNew Rochelle, NY

 

Owned

 

Civil

Ozone Park, NY

Leased

Specialty Contractors

Philadelphia, PA

 

Leased

Building

San Carlos, CA

 

Leased

 

Irvine, CA

Building

Owned

Las Vegas, NV

Specialty Contractors

Leased

Jamaica, NY

Specialty Contractors

Leased

Rosemount, MN

Civil

Owned



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Equipment Yards

Business Segment(s)

 

Owned or Leased by Tutor Perini

 

Business Segment(s)

Black River Falls, WI

Owned

Civil

Evansville, IN

Owned

Civil

Fontana, CA

 

Leased

Civil

Jessup, MD

Owned

Civil

Lakeview Terrace, CA

 

Leased

 

Specialty Contractors

Peekskill, NY

Owned

Civil

San Leandro, CA

Leased

Specialty Contractors

Stockton, CA

 

Building

Owned

Folcroft, PA

 

Building

Leased

Hilbert, WI

Civil

Leased

Long Island, NY

Specialty Contractors

Leased

Fort Lauderdale, FL

Specialty Contractors

Leased

  



20


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS



Legal Proceedings are set forth in our financial statement schedules in Part IV, Item 15Note 6 of this Annual Reportthe Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and are incorporated herein by reference. See Note 8 — Contingencies and Commitments of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

  

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES



Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) requires domesticWe do not own or operate any mines; however, we may be considered a mine operators to disclose violations and orders issuedoperator under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”) by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration. We do not act as the owner of any mines. However, we may be treated as acting as a mining operator as defined under the Mine Act because we are an independent contractor performingprovide construction services or construction of such mine. Information concerning mine safetyto customers in the mining industry. Accordingly, we provide information regarding mine-safety violations orand other regulatorymining-regulation matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 104 Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95. For 2014, revenues from mine construction services were less than $100 million.95 to this Form 10-K.

  

2116

 


 

Table of Contents

 

PART II.



ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES



Market Information



Our common stockCommon Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TPC”. In 2009, we changed our name to Tutor Perini Corporation from Perini Corporation and accordingly changed our symbol from “PCR” to “TPC”.“TPC.” The quarterly market high and low sales prices for our common stockCommon Stock in 20142017 and 2013 are summarized below:2016 were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

2017

 

2016

 

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

Market Price Range per Common Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

 

$

30.04 

 

$

21.06 

 

$

19.38 

 

$

13.70 

$

33.00 

 

$

26.75 

 

$

16.64 

 

$

10.16 

June 30

 

$

32.11 

 

$

26.83 

 

$

19.28 

 

$

15.47 

$

32.70 

 

$

25.35 

 

$

24.17 

 

$

14.35 

September 30

 

$

32.51 

 

$

26.25 

 

$

21.53 

 

$

18.02 

$

29.65 

 

$

23.30 

 

$

25.98 

 

$

19.80 

December 31

 

$

29.25 

 

$

20.07 

 

$

26.44 

 

$

20.08 

$

29.90 

 

$

22.60 

 

$

30.20 

 

$

18.05 



Holders



At February 20, 2015,21, 2018, there were 562401 holders of record of our common stock,Common Stock, including holders of record on behalf of an indeterminate number of beneficial owners, based on the stockholders list maintained by our transfer agent.owners.



Dividends

We currently have no future plans to pay cash dividends. Our revolving facility and senior unsecured notes also restrict us from making dividend payments. See Note 4 — Financial Commitments of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

For a description of our equity compensation plan, see Note 10 — Stock-Based Compensation of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities



There were no repurchases by the CompanyWe did not pay dividends or repurchase our Common Stock during 2017, nor do we have any immediate plans to do so. Furthermore, some of its equity securities during the three months ended December 31, 2014.our debt agreements restrict us from paying dividends or repurchasing stock.



Issuance of Unregistered Securities



None.



17


Table of Contents

Performance Graph



The performancefollowing graph required by this Item 5 is hereby incorporated by reference fromcompares the cumulative five-year total return to shareholders on our definitive proxy statementCommon Stock relative to be filed within 120 days after the endcumulative total returns of the fiscal year 2014.NYSE Composite Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Heavy Construction Index. We selected the Dow Jones U.S. Heavy Construction Index because we believe the index reflects the market conditions within the industry in which we primarily operate. The comparison of total return on investment, defined as the change in year-end stock price plus reinvested dividends, for each of the periods assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2012 in each of our Common Stock, the NYSE Composite Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Heavy Construction Index, with investment weighted on the basis of market capitalization.

The comparisons in the following graph are based on historical data and are not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our Common Stock.

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

Tutor Perini Corp NYSE Composite Index Dow Jones U.S. Heavy Construction Index

$225 $220 $175 $150 $125 $100 $75 $50 $25 $0

2012 2013 2014 2015 20

16 2017



2218

 


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA



Selected Consolidated Financial Information



The following selected financial data has been derived from our audited consolidatedshould be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 15. Exhibits andFinancial Statement Schedules inthis Annual Report. The following tables present selected financial statements anddata for the last five years. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements theand related notes theretoincluded in Item 15. Exhibits and the independent auditors’ report thereon, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K and in previously filed annual reports on Form 10-K of Tutor Perini Corporation. Backlog and new business awarded are not measures defined in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and have not been derived from audited consolidated financial statements. In conjunction with our 2011 and 2014 reorganizations, we have restated comparative prior period information for the reorganized reportable segments in each of the revenue and backlog tabular disclosures below. We have also restated comparative prior period results to allocate intersegment eliminations of revenues into the applicable Civil or Building segments to which the Specialty Contractors segment has provided services.Statement Schedules.











 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011(1)

 

2010(2)

 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

OPERATING SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

 

$

1,335,993 

 

$

985,245 

 

$

714,478 

Building

 

 

1,503,837 

 

 

1,551,979 

 

 

1,592,441 

 

 

1,928,612 

 

 

2,371,872 

Specialty Contractors

 

 

1,301,328 

 

 

1,182,277 

 

 

1,183,037 

 

 

802,460 

 

 

112,860 

Total

 

 

4,492,309 

 

 

4,175,672 

 

 

4,111,471 

 

 

3,716,317 

 

 

3,199,210 

Cost of Operations

 

 

3,986,867 

 

 

3,708,768 

 

 

3,696,339 

 

 

3,320,976 

 

 

2,861,362 

Gross Profit

 

 

505,442 

 

 

466,904 

 

 

415,132 

 

 

395,341 

 

 

337,848 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

263,752 

 

 

263,082 

 

 

260,369 

 

 

226,965 

 

 

165,536 

Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment (3)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

376,574 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Income (Loss) From Construction Operations

 

 

241,690 

 

 

203,822 

 

 

(221,811)

 

 

168,376 

 

 

172,312 

Other (Expense) Income, Net

 

 

(9,536)

 

 

(18,575)

 

 

(1,857)

 

 

4,421 

 

 

(2,280)

Interest Expense

 

 

(44,716)

 

 

(45,632)

 

 

(44,174)

 

 

(35,750)

 

 

(10,564)

Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes

 

 

187,438 

 

 

139,615 

 

 

(267,842)

 

 

137,047 

 

 

159,468 

(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

(52,319)

 

 

2,442 

 

 

(50,899)

 

 

(55,968)

Net Income (Loss)

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)

 

$

86,148 

 

$

103,500 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)

 

$

86,148 

 

$

103,500 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

2.22 

 

$

1.82 

 

$

(5.59)

 

$

1.82 

 

$

2.15 

Diluted

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

 

$

(5.59)

 

$

1.80 

 

$

2.13 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Dividend Paid Per Common Share

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

1.00 

Book Value Per Common Share

 

$

28.06 

 

$

25.76 

 

$

24.05 

 

$

29.58 

 

$

27.88 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

48,562 

 

 

47,851 

 

 

47,470 

 

 

47,226 

 

 

48,111 

Diluted

 

 

49,114 

 

 

48,589 

 

 

47,470 

 

 

47,890 

 

 

48,649 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS

Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands, except per common share data)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil

$

1,602,175 

 

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

Building

 

1,941,325 

 

 

2,069,841 

 

 

1,802,535 

 

 

1,503,837 

 

 

1,551,979 

Specialty Contractors

 

1,213,708 

 

 

1,234,272 

 

 

1,228,030 

 

 

1,301,328 

 

 

1,182,277 

Total

 

4,757,208 

 

 

4,973,076 

 

 

4,920,472 

 

 

4,492,309 

 

 

4,175,672 

Cost of operations

 

(4,302,803)

 

 

(4,515,886)

 

 

(4,564,219)

 

 

(3,986,867)

 

 

(3,708,768)

Gross profit

 

454,405 

 

 

457,190 

 

 

356,253 

 

 

505,442 

 

 

466,904 

General and administrative expenses

 

(274,928)

 

 

(255,270)

 

 

(250,840)

 

 

(263,752)

 

 

(263,082)

Income from construction operations(c)

 

179,477 

 

 

201,920 

 

 

105,413 

 

 

241,690 

 

 

203,822 

Other income (expense), net(b)

 

43,882 

 

 

6,977 

 

 

13,569 

 

 

(8,217)

 

 

(16,692)

Interest expense

 

(69,384)

 

 

(59,782)

 

 

(45,143)

 

 

(46,035)

 

 

(47,515)

Income before income taxes

 

153,975 

 

 

149,115 

 

 

73,839 

 

 

187,438 

 

 

139,615 

Income tax benefit (provision)(a)

 

569 

 

 

(53,293)

 

 

(28,547)

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

(52,319)

Net income

 

154,544 

 

 

95,822 

 

 

45,292 

 

 

107,936 

 

 

87,296 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

(6,162)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Net income attributable to Tutor Perini Corporation

$

148,382 

 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share:(a)(b)(c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

2.99 

 

$

1.95 

 

$

0.92 

 

$

2.22 

 

$

1.82 

Diluted

$

2.92 

 

$

1.92 

 

$

0.91 

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

49,647 

 

 

49,150 

 

 

48,981 

 

 

48,562 

 

 

47,851 

Diluted

 

50,759 

 

 

49,864 

 

 

49,666 

 

 

49,114 

 

 

48,589 

(a)

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was enacted reducing the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective in 2018. As a result, the Company recognized a favorable tax adjustment of $53.3 million ($1.05 per diluted share) primarily due to the revaluation of its deferred tax assets and liabilities.

(b)

On June 6, 2017, the Company received $37.0 million ($0.43 per diluted share) in a cash settlement with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”), as successor in interest to Banc of America Securities LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (collectively “BofA”). The settlement pertained to litigation, which was filed by the Company in 2011, and related to the purchase by the Company of certain auction-rate securities from BofA. The Company recognized the settlement as a gain during the second quarter of 2017. For additional information, see Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(c)

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had a decrease of $45.6 million in income from construction operations ($0.53 per diluted share) due to unfavorable adjustments on various Five Star Electric projects in the Specialty Contractors segment. In addition, that same year there was a decrease of $24.3 million in income from construction operations ($0.28 per diluted share) due to unfavorable adjustments to the estimated cost to complete a Building segment project in New York. The Company’s 2015 results were also impacted by an unfavorable adjustment for an adverse legal decision related to a long-standing litigation matter in the Civil segment, which resulted in a decrease of $23.9 million in income from construction operations ($0.28 per diluted share). Furthermore, the Company recorded favorable adjustments for a Civil segment runway reconstruction project, which resulted in an increase of $13.7 million in income from construction operations ($0.16 per diluted share) in 2015.

The Company's results for the year ended December 31, 2014 included a positive impact related to changes in the estimated recoveries for two Civil segment projects and a Building segment hospitality and gaming project. With respect to the two Civil segment projects, there was an increase of $25.9 million in income from construction operations ($0.30 per diluted share) and a $9.4 million decrease in income from construction operations ($0.11 per diluted share). The Building project change in estimate resulted in an $11.4 million increase in income from construction operations ($0.14 per diluted share).



2319

 


 

Table of Contents

 

The Company's income from construction operations during the year ended December 31, 2013 was positively impacted by $13.8 million ($0.18 per diluted share) because of changes in the estimated recovery for the above-mentioned hospitality and gaming project.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011 (1)

 

2010(2)

 

 

(In thousands, except ratios)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCIAL POSITION SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working Capital

 

$

1,113,980 

 

$

787,434 

 

$

747,577 

 

$

556,800 

 

$

592,928 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Ratio

 

 

1.82x

 

 

1.61x

 

 

1.61x

 

 

1.40x

 

 

1.61x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt

 

 

865,359 

 

 

733,884 

 

 

737,090 

 

 

672,507 

 

 

395,684 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity (3)

 

 

1,365,505 

 

 

1,247,535 

 

 

1,143,864 

 

 

1,399,827 

 

 

1,312,994 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ratio of  Debt to Equity

 

 

0.63x

 

 

.59x

 

 

.64x

 

 

.48x

 

 

.30x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

3,773,315 

 

$

3,397,438 

 

$

3,296,410 

 

$

3,613,127 

 

$

2,779,220 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog at Year End (4)

 

$

7,831,725 

 

$

6,954,287 

 

$

5,603,624 

 

$

6,108,277 

 

$

4,284,290 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Business Awarded (5)

 

$

5,369,747 

 

$

5,526,335 

 

$

3,606,818 

 

$

5,540,304 

 

$

3,173,309 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of and For the Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands, except ratios and percentages)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

$

3,074,392 

 

$

2,837,756 

 

$

2,608,939 

 

$

2,454,594 

 

$

2,077,680 

 

Current liabilities

 

1,581,846 

 

 

1,518,943 

 

 

1,448,819 

 

 

1,344,447 

 

 

1,288,235 

 

Working capital

$

1,492,546 

 

$

1,318,813 

 

$

1,160,120 

 

$

1,110,147 

 

$

789,445 

 

Current ratio

 

1.94 

 

 

1.87 

 

 

1.80 

 

 

1.83 

 

 

1.61 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

$

467,499 

 

$

477,626 

 

$

523,525 

 

$

527,602 

 

$

498,125 

 

Total assets

 

4,264,123 

 

 

4,038,620 

 

 

3,861,300 

 

 

3,711,450 

 

 

3,358,663 

 

Capitalization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

736,276 

 

 

759,519 

 

 

817,684 

 

 

857,791 

 

 

726,171 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,713,275 

 

 

1,553,023 

 

 

1,420,227 

 

 

1,365,505 

 

 

1,247,535 

 

Total capitalization

$

2,449,551 

 

$

2,312,542 

 

$

2,237,911 

 

$

2,223,296 

 

$

1,973,706 

 

Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization

 

30 

%

 

33 

%

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

 

37 

%

Ratio of debt to equity

 

0.43 

 

 

0.49 

 

 

0.58 

 

 

0.63 

 

 

0.58 

 

Stockholders' equity per common share

$

34.42 

 

$

31.56 

 

$

28.94 

 

$

28.06 

 

$

25.76 

 

OTHER DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog at year end

$

7,283,434 

 

$

6,227,137 

 

$

7,465,129 

 

$

7,831,725 

 

$

6,954,287 

 

New awards

 

5,813,505 

 

 

3,735,084 

 

 

4,553,877 

 

 

5,369,747 

 

 

5,526,335 

 

Capital expenditures

 

30,280 

 

 

15,743 

 

 

35,912 

 

 

75,829 

 

 

59,049 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

163,550 

 

 

113,336 

 

 

14,072 

 

 

(56,678)

 

 

50,728 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(41,409)

 

 

(18,495)

 

 

(32,415)

 

 

(26,957)

 

 

(43,574)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(75,376)

 

 

(24,190)

 

 

(41,788)

 

 

99,295 

 

 

(55,287)

 

______________

(1)

Includes the results of Fisk, Anderson, Frontier-Kemper, Lunda, WDF, Five Star Electric, Nagelbush and Becho as each was acquired during 2011.

(2)

Includes the results of Superior Gunite, acquired November 1, 2010.

(3)

Represents goodwill and intangible assets impairment charge of $376.6 million in 2012. See Note 3 Goodwill and other Intangible Assets of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(4)

A construction project is included in our backlog at such time as a contract is awarded, or a letter of commitment is obtained and adequate construction funding is in place. Backlog is not a measure defined in U.S. GAAP, and our backlog may not be comparable to the backlog of other companies. Management uses backlog to assist in forecasting future results.

(5)

New business awarded consists of the original contract price of projects added to our backlog in accordance with Note (4) above plus or minus subsequent changes to the estimated total contract price of existing contracts. For 2011 and 2010, this category also includes approximately $2.6 billion of backlog obtained through acquisitions. Management uses new business awarded to assist in forecasting future results.

  

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. For cautions about relying on such forward-looking statements, please refer to the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report immediately prior to Item 1. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Executive Overview



We were incorporatedConsolidated revenue for 2017 was $4.8 billion compared to $5.0 billion for 2016. The slight reduction was primarily due to decreased volume in 1918 as a successor to businesses that had been engaged in providing construction services since 1894. We provide diversified general contracting, construction management and design-build services to private customers and public agencies throughout the world. Our construction business is conducted through three basic segments or operations: Civil,our Building and Specialty Contractors. OurCivil segments attributed to various projects that are completed or nearing completion. The decrease was partially offset by higher volume on certain Civil segment specializesprojects in public works constructionCalifornia and New York, as well as certain Building segment projects in California and Maryland. In addition, revenue in 2017 was negatively impacted by the repair, replacementtiming of certain Building and reconstruction of infrastructure, including highways, bridges, mass transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities,Civil projects that are in ramp-up stages.

Consolidated revenue for 2016 was $5.0 compared to $4.9 billion for 2015. The modest improvement was attributable to higher volume in our Building segment, driven by various Building projects primarily in California.

Income from construction operations for 2017 was $179.5 million compared to $201.9 million for 2016. The decrease was driven by net unfavorable adjustments primarily related to certain mechanical projects, none of which were individually material, the western, midwestern, northeasternabove-mentioned volume changes, and mid-Atlantic United States. Ourhigher compensation-related general and administrative expenses in anticipation of a greater volume of new work. The decrease was partially offset by work performed on certain higher margin Civil and Building segment hasprojects.

Income from construction operations for 2016 was $201.9 million compared to $105.4 million for 2015. The increase was primarily due to significantly improved operating performance in all segments, as income from construction operations in 2015 included the impact of significant experience providing services to a number of specialized building markets, includingproject charges recorded for various Five Star Electric projects in New York in the hospitality and gaming, transportation, healthcare, municipal offices, sports and entertainment, educational, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical and high-tech markets. Our Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems, and pneumatically

2420

 


 

Table of Contents

 

placed concretesegment, decreased activity on certain higher-margin civil projects, unfavorable adjustments related to the estimate of costs to complete an office building project in New York and the adverse Brightwater litigation-related charge for a full range oflegacy civil and building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and transportation end markets, among others.project.



The contractingeffective tax rate was (0.4)%, 35.7% and management services that38.7% for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The effective tax rate for 2017 was positively impacted by the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The TCJA includes a number of provisions, including the lowering of the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. As a result of the TCJA, we provide consistrecognized an income tax benefit of general contracting, pre-construction planning$53.3 million related primarily to the adjustments resulting from the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and comprehensive management services, including planningliabilities. The 2016 rate was favorably impacted by rate changes associated with a shift in revenue mix between states affecting state apportionment, as well as various return-to-provision and schedulingdeferred tax adjustments related to depreciation. The 2015 rate was favorably impacted by the manpower, equipment, materialsresolution of certain state tax matters.

Earnings per diluted share was $2.92, $1.92 and subcontractors required$0.91 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Earnings per diluted share in 2017 included the above-mentioned tax benefit of $53.3 million ($1.05 per diluted share), as well as a gain on a $37.0 million ($0.43 per diluted share) legal settlement (see Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The substantial earnings growth in 2016 was due to significantly improved operating performance in all segments, as discussed above.

Cash flow from operations was $163.6 million in 2017 (a record high for the timely completionCompany since the 2008 merger) compared to $113.1 million in 2016, and compared to a cash flow from operations of $14.1 million in 2015. The record operating cash generated in 2017 was due to continued improvements in the Company’s billing and collection cycle as a project in accordance with the terms and specifications contained in a construction contract. We also offer self-performed construction services including site work, concrete forming and placement, steel erection, electrical and mechanical, plumbing, and HVAC. We provide these services by using traditional general contracting arrangements, such as fixed price, guaranteed maximum price and cost plus fee contracts. In our ordinary courseresult of business, we enter into arrangements with other contractors, referred to as “joint ventures,” for certain construction projects. Each of the joint venture participants is usually committed to supply a predetermined percentage ofmanagement’s intense focus on working capital as required, and to share in a predetermined percentage of the income or loss of the project. Generally, each joint venture participant is fully liable for the obligations of the joint venture.management.



We believe our leadership position as the contractor of choice for large, complex civilConsolidated new awards in 2017 were $5.8 billion compared to $3.7 billion in 2016 and building projects will support our long-term backlog growth. We have continued to experience increased contributions from our$4.6 billion in 2015. The Civil segment consistent with our focus on obtaining higher-margin public works projects. We expect to continue to leverage our increased self-performance and schedule control capabilities to obtain additional large-scalewas the predominant contributor of new awards during 2017. The Civil and Building awards. Our strong self-performance capabilities represent a unique competitive advantage. By self-performing certain specialized componentssegments were both major contributor of our projects when possible, we are able to capture profits that would otherwise be recognized by other contractors. We continue to capitalize on our leadership position as evidenced by our December 31, 2014 contractnew awards during 2016. The Building segment was the primary contributor of new awards during 2015.

Consolidated backlog of $7.8was $7.3 billion, an increase of $0.8$6.2 billion from $7.0and $7.5 billion as of December 31, 2013. In 2014, we received several significant new awards (discussed below, under Backlog Analysis for 2014)2017, 2016 and we continue to have a large volume2015, respectively. The Company experienced backlog growth of pending awards, including several additional phases of the Hudson Yards development project17% in New York and several mixed-use, hospitality and gaming, educational, and retail building development projects primarily on the East Coast and in the southern U.S.

During 2014, we experienced a high level of bidding activity, which subsequently translated into several large Civil and Building contracts, including two major mass transit projects in New York awarded in the first quarter, a large multi-unit residential tower project in Florida awarded in the second quarter, and a runway reconstruction project in New York and a healthcare facility project in California, both awarded in the third quarter. In addition, our work on the Hudson Yards project increased significantly in 2014, including continued activity on construction of the South Tower (Tower C), as well as substantial work on the Amtrak Tunnel and the platform over the eastern rail yard which will serve as the foundation for future towers at the site. Additional phases of the Hudson Yards project are expected to be awarded over the next one to two years. Several of our recently awarded large Civil projects have contract durations of approximately four to five years, and our larger recently awarded Building projects have contract durations of two to three years. Accordingly, we expect to realize the benefits of these projects over the next several years. Typically, in later stages of our projects, productivity increases are realized and claims and unapproved change orders, if any, are resolved. When projects are in later stages of completion, these changes may result in more significant impacts to profitability.

The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Results of Operations

 

% Change

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Favorable (Unfavorable)

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2014 vs. 2013

 

 

2013 vs. 2012

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

4,175,672 

 

$

4,111,471 

 

7.6 

%

 

1.6 

%

Cost of operations

 

 

3,986,867 

 

 

3,708,768 

 

 

3,696,339 

 

(7.5)

%

 

(0.3)

%

Gross profit

 

 

505,442 

 

 

466,904 

 

 

415,132 

 

8.3 

%

 

12.5 

%

General and administrative expenses

 

 

263,752 

 

 

263,082 

 

 

260,369 

 

(0.3)

%

 

(1.0)

%

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

376,574 

 

 —

 

 

100.0 

%

Income (loss) from construction operations

 

 

241,690 

 

 

203,822 

 

 

(221,811)

 

18.6 

%

 

191.9 

%

Other (expense) income, net

 

 

(9,536)

 

 

(18,575)

 

 

(1,857)

 

48.7 

%

 

(900.3)

%

Interest expense

 

 

(44,716)

 

 

(45,632)

 

 

(44,174)

 

2.0 

%

 

(3.3)

%

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

187,438 

 

 

139,615 

 

 

(267,842)

 

34.3 

%

 

152.1 

%

(Provision) benefit for income taxes

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

(52,319)

 

 

2,442 

 

52.0 

%

 

(2,242.5)

%

Net income (loss)

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)

 

23.6 

%

 

132.9 

%

25


Table of Contents

 

 

Consolidated Results of Operations

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(As a percentage of Revenues)

Revenues

 

100.0 

%

 

100.0 

%

 

100.0 

%

Cost of operations

 

88.7 

%

 

88.8 

%

 

89.9 

%

Gross profit

 

11.3 

%

 

11.2 

%

 

10.1 

%

General and administrative expenses

 

5.9 

%

 

6.3 

%

 

6.3 

%

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 

0.0 

%

 

0.0 

%

 

9.2 

%

Income (loss) from construction operations

 

5.4 

%

 

4.9 

%

 

(5.4)

%

Other (expense) income, net

 

(0.2)

%

 

(0.4)

%

 

0.0 

%

Interest expense

 

(1.0)

%

 

(1.1)

%

 

(1.1)

%

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

4.2 

%

 

3.4 

%

 

(6.5)

%

(Provision) benefit for income taxes

 

(1.8)

%

 

(1.3)

%

 

0.0 

%

Net income (loss)

 

2.4 

%

 

2.1 

%

 

(6.5)

%

Revenues were $4.5 billion in 2014, compared to $4.2 billion in 2013 and $4.1 billion in 2012. Income from construction operations was $241.7 million in 2014, compared to $203.8 million in 2013 and a loss from construction operations of $221.8 million in 2012. In 2012, our loss from construction operations of $221.8 million was materially impacted by a $376.6 million goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge ($326.4 million after-tax), due primarily to a deterioration in broader market conditions, degradation in the timing of projected cash flows used to derive the fair value, and a sustained decrease in the Company’s stock price, causing its market capitalization to be substantially less than its carrying value. See additional discussion under Critical Accounting Policies below. Net income was $107.9 million in 2014,  compared to a net income of $87.3 million in 2013 and net loss of $265.4 million in 2012. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $2.22 and $2.20, respectively, in 2014, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $1.82 and $1.80, respectively, in 2013, and basic and diluted loss per share of $5.59 and $5.59, respectively, in 2012. On an adjusted basis, net income and diluted earnings per share in 2012 were $70.3 million and $1.46, respectively, excluding the $326.4 million after-tax goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge, a $3.0 million after-tax litigation provision relating to an adverse court decision, $3.6 million in discrete tax expense adjustments, and a $2.7 million pre-tax loss on the sale of certain Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”). Net income and diluted earnings per share excluding these adjustments are non-U.S. GAAP financial measures, which are discussed below and are reconciled to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures.

Revenues increased by $316.6 million, or 7.6%,  during 2014.  This increase was due primarily to increased activity on projects at Hudson Yards in New York, certain electrical and mechanical projects on the East Coast, certain mass transit projects in California and New York, and certain bridge projects in the Midwest and New York. The increase was partially offset by decreased activity on hospitality and gaming projects in various states, healthcare projects in California, and tunnel projects on the West Coast.

Income from construction operations increased by $37.9 million,  or 18.6%,  during 2014.  This increase was due primarily to the revenue increase discussed above and net favorable adjustments to anticipated recoveries associated with two legal rulings issued in the second quarter of 2014.

Other expense (income), net, was an expense of $9.5 million in 2014, a decrease of $9.1 million compared to an expense of $18.6 million in 2013. This decrease was primarily2017, driven by decreases in contingent consideration retated to past business acquisition expenses.

Interest expense decreased by $0.9 million during 2014. This decrease was primarily driven by lower interest rates, offset by an increased level of borrowings.

The provision for income taxes increased by $27.2 million during 2014. This increase was primarily driven by increased net income and increased activity in certain higher-tax jurisdictions.

At December 31, 2014, we had working capital of $1.1 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.82, and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.63  compared to working capital of $0.8 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.61, and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.59 at December 31, 2013. Our stockholders’ equity increased to $1.4 billion asthe Civil segment. As of December 31, 2014 from $1.2 billion as2017, the mix of December 31, 2013.

Non-U.S. GAAP Measures

Our consolidated financial statements are presented based on U.S. GAAP. We sometimes use non-U.S. GAAP measuresbacklog by segment was 57% for Civil, 23% for Building and 20% for Specialty Contractors. The reduced level of income from operations, net income, earnings per share and other measures that we believe are appropriate to enhance an overall understandingbacklog at the end of our historical financial performance and future prospects. We are providing these non-U.S. GAAP measures to

26


Table2016 was the result of Contents

disclose additional information to facilitate the comparison of past and present operations, and they are among the indicators management uses as a basis for evaluating the Company’s financial performance as well as for forecasting future periods. For these reasons, management believes these non-U.S. GAAP measures can be useful operating performance measures to be considered by investors, prospective investors and others. These non-U.S. GAAP measures are not intended to replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and they may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

The following table is a reconciliation of reported income (loss) from construction operations, net income (loss), and diluted earnings (loss) per share under U.S. GAAP to income from operations, net income and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, excluding discrete items. Forrevenue burn during the year ended December 31, 2012, included in discrete items is the impact of the following one-time expenses (benefits): (i) a $326.4 million after-tax impairment charge, (ii) a $3.0 million after-tax litigation provision relating to an adverse court decision, (iii) $3.6 million of discrete tax expense items related to an increase in unrecognized tax benefits and an adjustment, both associated with certain stock-based compensation items identified during the first quarter of 2012, and (iv) a $2.7 million realized loss on the sale of ARS in the first quarter of 2012.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported net income (loss)

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)

Plus: Impairment charge

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

376,574 

Less: Tax benefit provided on impairment charge

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(50,158)

Plus: Litigation provision less tax benefit

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,980 

Plus: Realized loss on sale of investments

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,699 

Plus: Discrete tax adjustments

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,649 

Net income, excluding discrete items

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

70,344 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported diluted income (loss) per common share

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

 

$

(5.59)

Plus: Impairment charge, net of tax benefit

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

6.85 

Plus: Litigation provision less tax benefit

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

0.06 

Plus: Realized loss on sale of investments

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

0.06 

Plus: Discrete tax adjustments

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

0.08 

Diluted earnings per common share,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

excluding discrete items

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

 

$

1.46 

Backlog Analysis for 2014

Our backlog of uncompleted construction work at December 31, 2014 was approximately $7.8 billion compared to $7.0 billion at December 31, 2013. During 2014,  we booked a number of pending awards into backlog across each of our business segments and had significant net favorable adjustments to existing contracts. Significant new award bookings during 2014 included two mass transit projects in New York collectively valued at $844 million; a $255 million multi-unit residential tower project in Florida; a $243 million runway reconstruction project in New York; two hospitality and gaming projects in Mississippi and California collectively valued at $225 million; a $211 million healthcare facility project in California; three bridge projects in Wisconsin and Minnesota collectively valued at $181 million; a $120 million retail development project in California; and a $113 million technology building project in California. As a result of these and otherthat outpaced new awards and adjustments to existing contracts, we experienced strong backlog growth in ourthe Building and Specialty Contractors segments. OurThe relatively higher backlog at the end of 2015 was primarily due to significant new awards in the Building segment, partially offset by revenue burn that outpaced new awards in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments.

Most projects in the Civil segment’s backlog was flat fortypically convert to revenue over a period of three to five years and in the year despite several large new awards, asBuilding and Specialty Contractors segments over a resultperiod of the segment’s strong revenue performance in 2014.one to three years. We estimate that approximately $3.7$3.6 billion, or 47.8%49%, of our backlog atas of December 31, 20142017 will be recognized as revenue in 2015.2018.



In addition to our existing backlog, we continue to have a significant volume of pending contract awards, including up to $2.3 billion in the total construction value of various future phases of the Hudson Yards project, and various other contracts. We anticipate booking many of our pending awards into backlog over the next several quarters, and future phases of the Hudson Yards project over the next several years, as the contracts for these various projects are executed. We continue tracking several large-scale civil and building prospects for both public and private sector customers as we further leverage our self-performance and schedule control capabilities.

27


Table of Contents

The following table provides an analysis of ourpresents the changes in backlog by business segment for the year ended December 31, 2014.in 2017:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog at

 

New Business

 

Revenues

 

Backlog at

 

Backlog at

 

 

 

Revenue

 

Backlog at

 

December 31, 2013

 

Awarded (1)

 

Recognized

 

December 31, 2014

 

December 31,

 

New Awards

 

Recognized

 

December 31,

 

 

(in millions)

 

(in millions)

2016

 

in 2017 (a)

 

in 2017

 

2017

Civil

 

$

3,538.1 

 

$

1,712.2 

 

$

(1,687.1)

 

$

3,563.2 

 

$

2,672.1 

 

$

3,048.3 

 

$

(1,602.2)

 

$

4,118.2 

Building

 

1,755.1 

 

 

1,936.6 

 

 

(1,503.9)

 

2,187.8 

 

 

1,981.2 

 

 

1,661.5 

 

 

(1,941.3)

 

1,701.4 

Specialty Contractors

 

 

1,661.1 

 

 

1,720.9 

 

 

(1,301.3)

 

 

2,080.7 

 

 

1,573.8 

 

 

1,103.7 

 

 

(1,213.7)

 

1,463.8 

Total

 

$

6,954.3 

 

$

5,369.7 

 

$

(4,492.3)

 

$

7,831.7 

 

$

6,227.1 

 

$

5,813.5 

 

$

(4,757.2)

 

$

7,283.4 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

______________

(1)(a)

New business awarded consistsawards consist of the original contract price of projects added to our backlog plus or minus subsequent changes to the estimated total contract price of existing contracts.



Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting and financial reporting policies areThe outlook for our Company’s growth over the next several years continues to be the most favorable it has been in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 — Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules, the following discussion is intended to describe those accounting policies most critical to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Use of and Changes in Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our construction business involves making significant estimates and assumptionsmany years, particularly in the normal course of business relatingCivil segment. In addition to our contractssubstantial backlog, we expect significant new award activity based on long-term capital spending plans by state, local and our joint venture contracts duefederal customers, as well as bipartisan support for infrastructure investments. In recent U.S. elections, voters in numerous states approved dozens of long-term transportation funding measures totaling approximately $200 billion in long-term funding. The largest of these were in Los Angeles County, where Measure M, a half-cent sales tax increase, was approved and is expected to among other things,generate $120 billion of funding over 40 years and in Seattle, Washington, where Sound Transit 3 was passed and is expected to generate $54 billion of funding over 25 years. In addition, the one-of-a-kind nature of most of our projects, the long-term duration of our contract cycleTrump Administration has proposed a significant infrastructure investment program. Also, several large, long-duration civil infrastructure programs with which we are already involved are progressing, such as California’s High-Speed Rail system and the type of contract utilized. Therefore, management believes that the “Method of Accounting for Contracts” is the most importantNew York City’s East Side Access project. Planning and critical accounting policy. The most significant estimates with regard to these financial statements relate to the estimating of total forecasted construction contract revenues, costs and profits in accordance with accounting for long-term contracts (see Note 1 — Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, under the section entitled (d) Use of and Changes in Estimates of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules) and estimating potential liabilities in conjunction with certain contingencies,permitting activities continue on Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor Improvements, including the outcome of pending or future litigation, arbitration or other dispute resolution proceedings relatingGateway Program, which is expected to contract claims (see Note 8  —  Contingencieseventually bring new rail tunnels beneath the Hudson River to connect service between New Jersey and Commitments of the NotesNew York’s Penn Station. Finally, sustained low interest rates and capital costs are anticipated to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibitsdrive high demand and Financial Statement Schedules). Actual results could differ from these estimatescontinued spending by private and such differences could be material.

Our estimates of contract revenue and cost are highly detailed. We believe that, basedpublic customers on our experience, our current systems of management and accounting controls allow us to produce materially reliable estimates of total contract revenue and cost during any accounting period. However, many factors can and do change during a contract performance period which can result in a change to contract profitability from one financial reporting period to another. Some of the factors that can change the estimate of total contract revenue and cost include differing site conditions (to the extent that contract remedies are unavailable), the availability of skilled contract labor, the performance of major material suppliers to deliver on time, the performance of major subcontractors, unusual weather conditions and the accuracy of the original bid estimate. Because we have many contracts in process at any given time, these changes in estimates can offset each other minimizing the impact on overall profitability. However, large changes in cost estimates on larger, more complex construction projects can have a material impact on our financial statements and are reflected in our results of operations when they become known.

Management focuses on evaluating the performance of contracts individually. In the ordinary course of business, and at a minimum on a quarterly basis, we update projected total contract revenue, cost and profit or loss for each of our contracts based on changes in facts, such as an approved scope change, and changes in estimates. Normal, recurring changes in estimates include, but are not limited to: (i) changes in estimated scope as a result of unapproved or unpriced customer change orders; (ii) changes in estimated productivity assumptions based on experience to date; (iii) changes in estimated materials costs based on experience to date; (iv) changes in estimated subcontractor costs based on subcontractor buyout experience; (v) changes in the timing of scheduled work that may impact future costs; (vi) achievement of incentive income; and (vii) changes in estimated recoveries through the settlement of litigation.

infrastructure projects.

2821

 


 

Table of Contents

 

During

For a more detailed discussion of operating performance of each business segment, corporate general and administrative expenses and other items, see “Results of Segment Operations,” “Corporate, Tax and Other Matters” and “Liquidity and Financial Condition” below.

Results of Segment Operations

The following presents the year ended December 31, 2014, ourCompany’s results of operations were impacted by $27.9 million because of changes in the estimated recoveries on two segment:

Civil segment projects driven by changes in cost recovery assumptions based on certain legal rulings issued during the second quarter of 2014, as well as a final settlement agreement regarding a Building segment project reached with our customer during the fourth quarter of 2014, which resulted in a $11.4 million increase in the estimated recovery projected for that project. With respect to the two Civil segment projects, during 2014 there was a $25.9 million favorable increaseSegment

Revenue and a $9.4 million unfavorable decrease. These changes in estimates altogether resulted in an increase of $27.9 million in income from construction operations $16.0 millionfor the Civil segment are summarized as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in millions)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Revenue

$

1,602.2 

 

$

1,669.0 

 

$

1,889.9 

Income from construction operations

 

192.2 

 

 

172.7 

 

 

145.2 

Revenue for 2017 decreased a modest 4% compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to the impact of certain projects in net income,New York, Washington and $0.33the Midwest that are completed or nearing completion. The decrease was partially offset by increased activity on certain mass-transit projects in diluted earnings per common share during 2014.California and New York that are ramping up. Revenue for 2016 decreased 12% compared to 2015, principally due to the prior-year completion of a large runway reconstruction project in New York and reduced activity in 2016 on a platform project at Hudson Yards in New York, which is nearing completion. The decrease was partially offset by increased activity on various projects, including a large tunnel project in Seattle, Washington and a large mass-transit project in California.



DuringDespite the year ended December 31, 2013, our results of operations were impacted by a $13.8 million increase in the estimated recovery projected for a Building segment project due to changes in facts and circumstances that occurred during 2013. This change in estimate resulted in an increase of $13.8 million inrevenue reduction mentioned above, income from construction operations $8.6 millionincreased 11% in net income,2017 compared to 2016, principally due to increased project execution activity on certain higher-margin projects in California and $0.18New York. Income from construction operations increased 19% in diluted earnings per common share during 2013.2016 compared to 2015, due to improved operating performance and because the 2015 results included the Brightwater litigation-related charge of $23.9 million. The increase was partially offset by the impact of the reduced volume discussed above.



These changes were the only changesOperating margin was 12.0% in estimates considered material2017 compared to the Company's results of operations during the periods presented herein.

Contracts vary10.3% in lengths2016 and larger contracts can span over two to six years. At various stages of a contract’s life cycle, different types of changes7.7% in estimates are more typical. Generally during the early ramp up stage, cost estimates relating to purchases of materials and subcontractors are frequently subject to revisions. As a contract moves into the most productive phase of execution, change orders, project cost estimate revisions and claims are frequently the sources for changes in estimates. During the contract’s final phase, remaining estimated costs to complete or provisions for claims will be closed out and adjusted based on actual costs incurred.2015. The impact on operating margin increases in a reporting period2017 and future periods from a change in estimate will depend on the stage of contract completion. Generally, if the contract is at an early stage of completion, the current period impact is smaller than if the same change in estimate is made to the contract at a later stage of completion. Likewise, if the company’s overall project portfolio was to be at a later stage of completion during the reporting period, the overall gross margin could be subject to greater variability from changes in estimates.

When recording revenue on contracts relating to unapproved change orders and claims, we include in revenue an amount less than or equal to the amount of costs incurred by us to date for contract price adjustments that we seek to collect from customers for delays, errors in specifications or designs, change orders in dispute or unapproved as to scope or price, or other unanticipated additional costs, in each case when recovery of the costs is considered probable. The amount of unapproved change orders and claim revenues is included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as part of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings. When determining the likelihood of eventual recovery, we consider such factors as evaluation of entitlement, settlements reached to date and our experience with the customer. The settlement of these issues may take years depending upon whether the item can be resolved directly with the customer or involves litigation or arbitration. When new facts become known, an adjustment to the estimated recovery is made and reflected in the current period results.

Method of Accounting for Contracts — Revenues and profits from our contracts and construction joint venture contracts are recognized by applying percentages of completion for the period to the total estimated revenues for the respective contracts. Percentage of completion is determined by relating the actual cost of the work performed to date to the current estimated total cost of the respective contracts. When the estimate on a contract indicates a loss, the entire loss is recorded during the accounting period in which it is estimated. In the ordinary course of business, at a minimum on a quarterly basis, we prepare updated estimates of the total forecasted revenue, cost and profit or loss for each contract. The cumulative effect of revisions in estimates of the total forecasted revenue and costs, including unapproved change orders and claims, during the course of the work is reflected in the accounting period in which the facts that caused the revision become known. The financial impact of these revisions to any one contract is a function of both the amount of the revision and the percentage of completion of the contract. An amount up to the costs incurred that are attributable to unapproved change orders and claims is included in the total estimated revenue when realization is probable. For a further discussion of unapproved change orders and claims, see Item 1. Business under the section entitled Types of Contracts and The Contract Process and Item 1A. Risk Factors. Profit from unapproved change orders and claims is recorded in the accounting period in which such amounts are resolved.

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings represents the excess of contract billings to date over the amount of contract costs and profits (or contract revenue) recognized to date on the percentage of completion accounting method. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings represents the excess of contract costs and profits (or contract revenue) recognized to date on the percentage of completion accounting method over contract billings to date. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings results when (1) the appropriate contract revenue amount has been recognized in accordance with the percentage of completion accounting method, but a portion of the revenue recorded cannot be billed currently2016 were primarily due to the billing terms definedreasons discussed above that impacted revenue and income from construction operations.

New awards in the contract and/or (2) costs, recordedCivil segment totaled $3.0 billion in 2017, $1.6 billion in 2016 and $1.1 billion in 2015. New awards in 2017 included a $1.4 billion joint venture mass-transit project in California; a bridge project in Iowa valued at estimated realizable value, related to unapproved change orders or claims are incurred. For unapproved change orders or claims that cannot be resolved$323 million; a mass-transit project in accordance withNew York worth $292 million; a joint venture tunnel project for a hydroelectric generating station in British Columbia, Canada, valued at $274 million; a bridge project in New York valued at $189 million; $97 million of additional scope for a platform project in New York; a joint venture bridge project in Minnesota, for which the normal change order process as definedCompany’s portion is valued at $90 million; a bridge project in New York valued at $82 million; a highway project in Maryland worth $78 million; and a military training range project in Guam worth $78 million.

New awards in 2016 included a $663 million mass-transit project in New York, approximately $277 million of new bridge projects in the Midwest, the Company’s share of $244 million of additional contract we may employ other dispute resolution methods,scope for a mass-transit project in California, a $107 million highway project in Virginia and a $97 million airport terminal expansion project in Guam. New awards in 2015 included a mass-transit project in New York valued at $80 million; highway projects in Delaware, Maryland and Pennsylvania valued at $70 million, $60 million and $58 million, respectively; and a tunnel extension project in New York worth $56 million.

Backlog for the Civil segment was $4.1 billion as of December 31, 2017, compared to $2.7 billion as of both December 31, 2016 and 2015. Civil segment backlog grew 54% year-over-year in 2017 as a result of significant new award activity, including mediation, bindingthe above-mentioned $1.4 billion mass-transit project in California. The segment continues to experience strong demand reflected in a large pipeline of prospective projects and non-binding arbitration, or litigation. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings substantial anticipated funding from various voter-approved transportation measures; the Trump Administration’s considerable proposed infrastructure investment program; and Note 8 - Contingencies and Commitments public agencies’ long-term spending plans. The Civil segment is well-positioned to capture its share of the Notesthese prospective projects. The segment, however, continues to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financialface considerable competition, including occasional aggressive bids from foreign competitors.

2922

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Statement Schedules. The prerequisite for billing unapproved change orders and claims is the final resolution and agreement between the parties. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings related to our contracts and joint venture contracts at December 31, 2014 is discussed above under “Use of and Changes in Estimates” and in Note 1 — Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.Building Segment



ImpairmentRevenue and income from construction operations for the Building segment are summarized as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in millions)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Revenue

$

1,941.3 

 

$

2,069.8 

 

$

1,802.5 

Income (Loss) from construction operations

 

34.2 

 

 

51.6 

 

 

(1.2)

Revenue for 2017 decreased slightly compared to 2016, principally due to decreased project execution activity on certain projects in California and Florida that are substantially complete, partially offset by increased activity on certain hospitality and gaming projects and a large technology project. Revenue for 2016 increased 15% compared to 2015, principally due to increased activity on various commercial office, technology, health care, hospitality and gaming, and retail building projects in California. This increase was partially offset by the completion in 2015 of Goodwilla hospitality and Other Intangible Assets - Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Construction contract backlog is amortizedgaming project in Mississippi.

Income from construction operations decreased 34% in 2017 compared to 2016, primarily due to favorable close-out activities in 2016 on two projects in New York and the volume changes mentioned above. The decrease was partially offset by improved performance on a weighted-average basis overlarge technology project in California that is nearing completion. Income from construction operations increased considerably in 2016 compared to 2015 due to improved operating performance and the corresponding contract period. Customer relationships and certain trade names are amortizedabove-mentioned favorable close-out activities on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. We evaluate intangible assets that are not being amortized at the end of each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.

We test goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment by applying a fair value test in the fourth quarter of each year and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change which suggest that the goodwill or intangible assets should be evaluated. Intangible assets with finite lives are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The first step in the two-step process of the impairment analysis is to determine the fair value of the Company and each of its reporting units and compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step must be followed to calculate the goodwill impairment. The second step involves determining the fair value of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit that failed the first step and calculating the implied fair value of goodwill. To determine the fair value of the Company and each of its reporting units, we utilize both an income-based valuation approachtwo New York projects, as well as unfavorable adjustments in 2015, totaling $24.3 million, to the estimated cost to complete an office building project in New York.

Operating margin was 1.8% in 2017 compared to 2.5% in 2016 and (0.1)% in 2015. The operating margin changes in 2017 and 2016 were due to the factors mentioned above that drove the changes in revenue and income from construction operations.

New awards in the Building segment totaled $1.7 billion in 2017, $1.3 billion in 2016 and $2.4 billion in 2015. New awards in 2017 included four health care projects in California collectively worth $328 million; $250 million of initial funding for a market-based valuation approach.new technology office building in California, which is eventually anticipated to be worth approximately $500 million; additional scope of work valued at $121 million for a technology office project in California; a U.S. embassy renovation project in Uruguay valued at $87 million; and an $80 million military facility project in Saudi Arabia. New awards in 2016 included a hospitality and gaming project in California and another in Maryland, collectively valued at $372 million; a hospitality project in California valued at $120 million; and a multi-unit residential project in Florida valued at $72 million. New awards in 2015 included a technology research and development office project valued at $800 million and $230 million of incremental funding for a biotechnology project, both in California, and a hospitality project in Pennsylvania worth $239 million.

Backlog for the Building segment was $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2017, compared to $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2016 and $2.8 billion as of December 31, 2015. The income-based valuation approachdecline in backlog for both 2017 and 2016 was due to revenue burn that outpaced new awards during each year. Building segment backlog is anticipated to grow in 2018, as the segment continues to have a large volume of prospective projects, some of which have already been bid and are expected to be selected and awarded by customers during the first half of 2018. Elevated demand is expected to continue due to ongoing customer spending supported by a low interest rate environment. The Building segment is well-positioned to capture its share of prospective projects based on its strong customer relationships and long-term reputation for excellence in delivering high-quality projects on time and within budget.

Specialty Contractors Segment

Revenue and income from construction operations for the cash flows that the reporting unit expectsSpecialty Contractors segment are summarized as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in millions)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Revenue

$

1,213.7 

 

$

1,234.3 

 

$

1,228.0 

Income from construction operations

 

18.9 

 

 

37.9 

 

 

15.7 

Revenue for 2017 decreased modestly compared to generate2016. Decreased activity on various electrical projects in New York was largely offset by increased activity on various electrical projects in the futuresouthern U.S. and it requires us to project revenues, operating expenses, working capital investment, capital spending and cash flowsCalifornia. Revenue for the reporting unit in a discrete period, as well as determine the weighted-average cost of capital to be used as a discount rate and a terminal value growth rate for the non-discrete period. The market-based valuation approach to estimate the fair value of our reporting units utilizes industry multiples of revenues and operating earnings. We conclude on the fair value of the reporting units by assuming a 67% weighting on the income-based approach and a 33% weighing on the market-based valuation approach.2016 was virtually level with 2015.



As part of the valuation process, the aggregate fair value of the Company isIncome from construction operations decreased 50% in 2017 compared to its market capitalization at the valuation date in order2016, principally due to determine an implied control premium. In evaluating whether our implied control premium is reasonable, we consider a number of factors including the following factors of greatest significance.

·

Market control premium: We compare our implied control premium to the average control premium paid in transactions of companies in the construction industry during the year of evaluation.

·

Sensitivity analysis: We perform a sensitivity analysis to determine the minimum control premium required to recover the book value of the Company at the testing date. The minimum control premium required is then compared to the average control premium paid in transactions of companies in the construction industry during the year of evaluation.

·

Impact of low public float and limited trading activity:  A significant portion of our common stock is owned by our Chairman and CEO. As a result, the public float of our common stock, calculated as the percentage of shares of common stock freely traded by public investors divided by our total shares outstanding, is significantly lower than that of its publicly traded peers. This circumstance does not impact the fair value of the Company, however based on its evaluation of third party market data, we believe it does lead to an inherent marketability discount impacting its stock price.

Impairment assessment inherently involves management judgments as to the assumptions used for projections and to evaluate the impact of market conditionsunfavorable project adjustments on those assumptions.certain mechanical projects in New York and California, none of which were individually material. The key assumptions that we use to estimatedecrease was partially offset by improved profitability on various electrical projects in New York and increased activity on various electrical projects in the fair value of our reporting units under the income-based approach are as follows:

·

Weighted-average cost of capital used to discount the projected cash flows;

·

Cash flows generated from existing and new work awards; and

·

Projected operating margins.

Weighted-average cost of capital rates used to discount the projected cash flows are developed via the capital asset pricing model which is primarily based upon market inputs. We use discount rates that management feels are an accurate reflection of the risks associated with the forecasted cash flows of our respective reporting units.

To develop the cash flows generatedsouthern U.S. and California. Income from new work awards and future operating margins, we primarily track prospective work for each of our reporting units on a project-by-project basis as well as the estimated timing of when the work would be bid or prequalified, started and completed. We also give consideration to our relationships with the prospective owners, the pool of competitors that are capable of performing large, complex work, changesconstruction operations increased 141% in business strategy and the Company’s history of success in winning new work2016 because 2015 included

3023

 


 

Table of Contents

 

unfavorable adjustments totaling $45.6 million for several Five Star Electric projects in each reporting unit. With regardNew York, none of which were individually material.

Operating margin was 1.6% in 2017 compared to operating margins, we give consideration3.1% in 2016 and 1.3% in 2015. The margin changes in 2017 and 2016 were due to our historical reporting unit operating marginsthe factors mentioned above that impacted income from construction operations for both years.

New awards in the end markets thatSpecialty Contractors segment totaled $1.1 billion in 2017, $867 million in 2016 and $1.1 billion in 2015. New awards in 2017 included approximately $426 million for various electrical projects in the prospective work opportunities are most significant, current market trendssouthern U.S. and California, two electrical subcontracts for mass-transit projects in recent new work procurement,New York collectively valued at $158 million, and changesfour mechanical contracts in business strategy.New York with a total value of $131 million. New awards in 2016 included various mechanical projects in New York collectively valued at approximately $146 million, several electrical projects in the southern United States totaling approximately $93 million and an electrical subcontract for a mass-transit project in New York valued at $86 million. New awards in 2015 included an electrical subcontract valued at $90 million for a mass-transit project in New York and an electrical subcontract valued at $73 million for a Hudson Yards office tower in New York.



We also estimateBacklog for the fair value of our reporting units under a market-based approach by applying industry-comparable multiples of revenues and operating earnings to our reporting units’ projected performance. The conditions and prospects of companies in the construction industry depend on common factors suchSpecialty Contractors segment was $1.5 billion as overall demand for services.

Changes in our assumptions or estimates could materially affect the determination of the fair value of a reporting unit. Such changes in assumptions could be caused by:

·

Terminations, suspensions, reductions in scope or delays in the start-up of the revenues and cash flows from backlog as well as the prospective work we track;

·

Reductions in available government, state and local agencies and non-residential private industry funding and spending;

·

Our ability to effectively compete for new work and maintain and grow market penetration in the regions that the Company operates in;

·

Our ability to successfully control costs, work schedule, and project delivery; or

·

Broader market conditions, including stock market volatility in the construction industry and its impact on the weighted- average cost of capital assumption.

On a quarterly basis we consider whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that assets, including goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization might be impaired. In conjunction with this analysis, we evaluate whether our current market capitalization is less than our stockholders’ equity and specifically consider (1) changes in macroeconomic conditions, (2) changes in general economic conditions in the construction industry including any declines in market-dependent multiples, (3) cost factors such as increases in raw materials, labor, or other costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows analyses, (4) a reconciliation of the implied control premium to a current market control premium, (5) target price assessments by third party analysts and (6) the impact of current market conditions on its forecast of future cash flows including consideration of specific projects in backlog, pending awards, or large prospect opportunities. We also evaluate our most recent assessment of the fair value for each of our reporting units, considering whether our current forecast of future cash flows is in line with those used in our annual impairment assessment and whether there are any significant changes in trends or any other material assumptions used.

As of December 31, 2014, we2017 compared to $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2016 and $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2015. The Specialty Contractors segment continues to have concluded that we do not have an impairmenta substantial volume of prospective projects, with demand for its services supported by sustained spending on civil and building projects. The Specialty Contractors segment is well-positioned to capture its share of prospective projects based on the size and scale of our goodwill or our indefinite-lived intangible assetsbusiness units that operate in New York, Texas, Florida and thatCalifornia and the estimated fair value of each reporting unit exceeds its carrying value. See Note 3 — Goodwillstrong reputation held by these business units for high-quality work on large, complex projects.

Corporate, Tax and Other Intangible AssetsMatters

Corporate General and Administrative Expenses

Corporate general and administrative expenses were $65.9 million in 2017, $60.2 million in 2016 and $54.2 million in 2015. The increase in 2017 was primarily due to higher compensation-related expenses pertaining to the employment and retention of certain key executives. In 2016, the increase in corporate general and administrative expenses compared to 2015 was predominantly due to increased compensation expense attributable to improved financial results and the hiring of several key executives.

Other Income, Net, Interest Expense and Income Tax Benefit (Provision)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in millions)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Other income, net

$

43.9 

 

$

7.0 

 

$

13.6 

Interest expense

 

(69.4)

 

 

(59.8)

 

 

(45.1)

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

0.6 

 

 

(53.3)

 

 

(28.5)

Other income, net, increased by $36.9 million in 2017 compared to 2016, and decreased $6.6 million in 2016 compared to 2015. The increase in 2017 was due to a $37.0 million legal settlement, as discussed in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements. Other income in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule for additional goodwill disclosure.2015 included adjustments to decrease contingent earn-out liabilities related to prior business acquisitions.



AtInterest expense increased $9.6 million in 2017 compared to the prior year, principally due to non-cash extinguishment costs related to our debt restructuring transactions in April 2017, as well as increased non-cash interest charges from the amortization of debt discount and issuance costs. Interest expense in 2016 increased $14.7 million compared to 2015 primarily due to cash and non-cash interest expense related to the Convertible Notes issued in June 2016, as well as an increase in non-cash interest expense associated with fees related to two amendments to the Company’s 2014 Credit Facility. The year ended December 31, 2013, the carrying value of our investment in auction rate securities (“ARS”) approximated fair value.

On April 30, 2014, the Company sold its ARS for $44.5 million.  At December 31, 2013 the Company had $46.3 million invested in these ARS which the Company considered as available-for-sale long-term investments. The long-term investments in ARS held2016 was also impacted by the Company at December 31, 2013 were in securities collateralized by student loan portfolios. At both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, most of the Company’s ARS were rated AA+ and approximated fair value.higher net borrowing rates.



The contingent consideration involvedeffective income tax rate was (0.4)% for 2017, 35.7% for 2016 and 38.7% for 2015. As discussed in the purchases of several of our recently acquired entities is also measured at fair value utilizing unobservable (Level 3) inputs. We estimate these fair values utilizingExecutive Overview, we recognized an income approach which is based ontax benefit of $53.3 million in 2017 related primarily to the cash flows thatadjustments resulting from the acquired entity is expectedremeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities due to generatethe enactment of the TCJA. Excluding the benefit resulting from the enactment of the TCJA, the effective income tax rate for 2017 would have been 34.3%. The effective tax rate for 2016 compared to 2015 was favorably impacted by rate changes associated with a shift in the future. This approach requires management to project revenues, operating expenses, working capital investment, capital spending and cash flows for the reporting unit over a multi-year period,revenue mix between states affecting state apportionment, as well as determine the weighted-average cost of capital to be used as a discount rate. See Note 2 — Fair Value Measurements of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibitsvarious return-to-provision and Financial Statement Schedules for more information on our investment in ARS and contingent consideration.depreciation adjustments.

  

Share-based Compensation - We have granted restricted stock unitsLiquidity and stock optionsFinancial Condition

Liquidity is provided by available cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations, credit facilities and access to certain employeescapital markets. On April 20, 2017, we issued $500 million of senior notes and non- employee directors. We recognize share-based compensation expense net of an estimated forfeiture rate and only recognize compensation expense for those shares expected to vest onentered into a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award (which corresponds to the vesting period). Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of stock option awards requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock option awards and the expected volatility of our stock price over the life of the awards. We used the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to value our stock option awards, and utilized the historical volatility of our common stock asnew credit facility with a reasonable estimate of the future volatility of our common stock over the$350 million revolver.

3124

 


 

Table of Contents

 

expected lifeWe used the net proceeds to repurchase or redeem our 7.625% Senior Notes due 2018, (the “2010 Senior Notes”) in full and repay all borrowings under our Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (with subsequent amendments, the “2014 Credit Facility”, with Bank of the awards.America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties2014 Credit Facility provides for a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “2014 Revolver”), a $250 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change which require the use of different assumptions, share-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. In addition, if the actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, share-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what has been recorded through December 31, 2014.

Insurance Liabilities — We assume the risksublimit for the issuance of letters of credit up to the aggregate amount of $150 million, all maturing on May 1, 2018. We believe that the deductible portion of the losses and liabilities primarily associated with workers’ compensation, general liability and automobile liability coverage. Losses are accrued based upon our estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using historical experience and certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry. The estimate of our insurance liability within our deductible limits includes an estimate of incurred but not reported claims based on data compiledincreased liquidity that resulted from historical experience. Actual experience could differ significantly from these estimates and could materially impact our consolidated financial position and results of operations. We purchase varying levels of insurance from third parties, including excess liability insurance, to cover losses in excess of our deductible limits. Currently, our deductible limit for workers’ compensation, general liability and automobile coverage is generally $1.0 million per occurrence, subject to a policy aggregate loss limitation based upon policy exposures. In addition, on certain projects, we assume the riskthis refinancing will help fund any working capital needs for the amountsignificant number of the deductible portion of losses and a co-payment amountproject opportunities that arise from any subcontractor defaults. Our deductible limit for subcontractor default on projects covered under our program ranges from $0.5 million to $2.0 million per occurrence, with a co- payment of 20% ofwe see over the next $5.0 million, subject to an annual aggregate ranging from $3.5 million to $4.0 million.

Accounting for Income Taxes — Information relating to our provision for income taxes and the status of our deferred tax assets and liabilities is presented in Note 5 - Income Taxes of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. A key assumption in the determination of our book tax provision is the amount of the valuation allowance, if any, required to reduce the related deferred tax assets. The net deferred tax assets reflect management’s estimate of the amount which will, more likely than not, reduce future taxable income.

Our accounting policy requires us to identify and review potential tax uncertainties for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and determine whether the exposure to those uncertainties have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition as of December 31, 2014.

Defined Benefit Retirement Plan — The status of our defined benefit pension plan obligations, related plan assets and cost is presented in Note 7 - Employee Benefit Plans of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. Plan obligations and annual pension expense are determined by actuaries using a number of key assumptions which include, among other things, the discount rate and the estimated future return on plan assets. The discount rate of 4.47% used for purposes of computing the 2014 annual pension expense was determined at the beginning of the calendar year based upon an analysis performed by our actuaries which matches the cash flows of our plan’s projected liabilities to bond investments of similar amounts and durations. We plan to change the discount rate used for computing the 2015 annual pension expense to 3.75% based upon a similar analysis by our actuaries.

The estimated return on plan assets is primarily based on historical long-term returns of equity and fixed income markets according to our targeted allocation of plan assets 90% equity, 5% fixed income and 5% cash. We plan to use a return on asset rate of 6.75% in 2015 based on projected equity performance compared to long-term historical averages.

The plans’ benefit obligations exceeded the fair value of plan assets on December 31, 2014 and 2013 by $35 million and $22.6 million, respectively. Accordingly, we recorded adjustments to our pension liability with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity.

Effective June 1, 2004, all benefit accruals under our pension plan were frozen; however, the vested benefit was preserved. We anticipate that pension expense will increase from $3.7 million in 2014 to $4.9 million in 2015. Cash contributions to our defined benefit pension plan are anticipated to be approximately $2.3 million in 2015. Cash contributions may vary significantly in the future depending upon asset performance and the interest rate environment.

32


Table of Contents

Results of Operations -

2014 Compared to 2013

Revenues

The following table summarizes our revenues by business segment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues for the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

$ Change

 

% Change

Civil

 

$

1,687.1 

 

$

1,441.4 

 

$

245.7 

 

17.0 

%

Building

 

 

1,503.8 

 

 

1,552.0 

 

 

(48.2)

 

(3.1)

%

Specialty Contractors

 

 

1,301.4 

 

 

1,182.3 

 

 

119.1 

 

10.1 

%

Total Revenues

 

$

4,492.3 

 

$

4,175.7 

 

$

316.6 

 

7.6 

%

Civil Segment

Civil segment revenues were $1,687.1 million in 2014,  increase of $245.7 million, or 17%, compared to $1,441.4 million in 2013. The increase in revenues was due primarily to increased activity on civil projects at Hudson Yards in New York, certain mass transit projects in California and New York, certain bridge projects in the Midwest and New York, and a runway reconstruction project in New York. The increase was partially offset by decreased activity on certain tunnel projects on the West Coast, certain highway projects on the East Coast, and an airport parking apron project in Guam.

Building Segment

Building segment revenues were $1,503.8 million in 2014, a decrease of $48.2 million, or 3.1%, compared to $1,552.0 million in 2013. The decrease was due primarily to decreased activity on hospitality and gaming projects in California, Arizona, Nevada, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania, healthcare projects in California, and a containerized housing project in Iraq. The decrease was partially offset by increased activity on certain mixed-use facility projects in New York (including Hudson Yards), California, and Louisiana, and an industrial project in California.

Specialty Contractors Segment

Specialty Contractors segment revenues were $1,301.4 million in 2014, an increase of $119.1 million, or 10.1%, compared to $1,182.3 million in 2013. The increase was due primarily to increased activity on various mechanical projects on the East Coast, two signal system modernization projects in New York, and various electrical projects in the southern U.S. The increase was partially offset by Hurricane Sandy-related projects performed in 2013.

Income from Construction Operations

The following table summarizes our income (loss) from construction operations by business segment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Construction Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and Operating Margins for the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Change in

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Amount

 

Margin

(dollars in millions)

 

Amount

 

Margin

 

Amount

 

Margin

 

$

 

%

 

%

Civil

 

$

220.6 

 

13.1 

%

 

$

177.7 

 

12.3 

%

 

$

42.9 

 

24.1 

%

 

0.8 

%

Building

 

 

24.7 

 

1.6 

%

 

 

24.5 

 

1.6 

%

 

 

0.2 

 

0.8 

%

 

 —

%

Specialty Contractors

 

 

51.0 

 

3.9 

%

 

 

49.0 

 

4.1 

%

 

 

2.0 

 

4.1 

%

 

(0.2)

%

 

 

 

296.3 

 

6.6 

%

 

 

251.2 

 

6.0 

%

 

 

45.1 

 

18.0 

%

 

0.6 

%

Corporate

 

 

(54.6)

 

(1.1)

%

 

 

(47.4)

 

(1.1)

%

 

 

(7.2)

 

15.2 

%

 

 —

%

Income from construction operations

 

 

241.7 

 

5.4 

%

 

 

203.8 

 

4.9 

%

 

 

37.9 

 

18.6 

%

 

0.5 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following discussion of income (loss) from construction operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 has been prepared to compare operating results of each segment between the two fiscalseveral years.



33


Table of Contents

Civil Segment

Civil segment income from construction operations was $220.6 million in 2014,  an increase of $42.9 million, or 24.1%,  compared to $177.7 million in 2013. The increase was due primarily to the volume changes discussed above under Revenues and net favorable adjustments to anticipated recoveries associated with two legal rulings issued in the second quarter of 2014. The increase was partially offset by reduced activity on certain higher-margin projects.

Civil segment operating margin increased from 12.3% in 2013 to 13.1% in 2014 due primarily to the reasons discussed above.

Building Segment

Building segment income from construction operations was $24.7 million in 2014,  an increase of $0.2 million, or 0.8%, compared to $24.5 million in 2013. The increase  was due primarily to the volume changes discussed above under Revenues and a decrease in general and administrative expenses in 2014 due primarily to increased staff utilization.

Building segment operating margins remained stable: 1.6% in 2013 and 1.6% in 2014.

Specialty Contractors Segment

Specialty Contractors segment income from construction operations was $51.0 million in 2014,  an increase of $2.0 million, or 4.1%,  compared to $49.0 million in 2013. The increase was due primarily to the volume changes discussed above under Revenues  and improved financial performance in two of our Specialty Contractors business units. The increase was partially offset by a settlement related to a large hospitality and gaming electrical subcontract recorded in the second quarter of 2013.

Specialty Contractors segment operating margin declined from 4.1% in 2013 to 3.9% in 2014 due primarily to lower-than-expected profitability from our mechanical business unit in New York.

Corporate

Corporate general and administrative expenses were $54.6 million in 2014,  an increase of $7.2 million, or 15.2%, compared to $47.4 million in 2013. The increase was due primarily to increased performance-based incentive compensation expense.

Other Income (Expense), Interest Expense and Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

$ Change

 

% Change

Other Income (Expense), net

 

$

(9.5)

 

$

(18.6)

 

$

9.1 

 

(48.9)

%

Interest Expense

 

 

44.7 

 

 

45.6 

 

 

(0.9)

 

(2.0)

%

Provision for Income Taxes

 

 

79.5 

 

 

52.3 

 

 

27.2 

 

52.0 

%

Other income (expense), net, decreased by $9.1 million, or 48.9%,  during 2014 compared to 2013 due primarily to decreases in contingent consideration retated to past business acquisitions.  

Interest expense decreased by $0.9 million, or 2.0%,  during 2014 compared to 2013 due primarily to lower interest rates, offset by an increased level of borrowings.

The provision for income taxes was $79.5 million during 2014 compared to $52.3 million during 2013. The increase was due primarily to increased net income and increased activity in certain higher-tax jurisdictions. 

34


Table of Contents

Results of Operations -

2013 Compared to 2012

During the first quarter of 2014, we completed a reorganization which resulted in the elimination of the Management Services reporting unit and reportable segment. The Management Services reporting unit formerly consisted of the following subsidiary companies: Black Construction and Perini Management Services. The reorganization was completed due to changes in volume of business resulting in a change in organizational structure as the unit no longer met the criteria set forth in FASB ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting”. The following information has been restated as required by U.S. GAAP  to include the affected subsidiary companies in the Civil and Building segments and remove the Management Services segment accordingly .

Revenues

The following table summarizes our revenues by segment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues for the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

Civil

 

$

1,441.4 

 

$

1,336.0 

 

$

105.4 

 

7.9 

%

Building

 

 

1,552.0 

 

 

1,592.5 

 

 

(40.5)

 

(2.5)

%

Specialty Contractors

 

 

1,182.3 

 

 

1,183.0 

 

 

(0.7)

 

(0.1)

%

Total Revenues

 

$

4,175.7 

 

$

4,111.5 

 

$

64.2 

 

1.6 

%

Civil Segment

Civil segment revenues were $1,441.4 million in 2013, an increase of $105.4 million, or 7.9%, compared to $1,336.0 million in 2012. The increase was due primarily to the start-up of civil projects at Hudson Yards in New York and certain rail transportation projects in California, as well as increased activity on pipeline projects in the Midwest, a large tunnel project in Washington, an airport runway expansion project in Florida, and an aircraft parking apron project in Guam. The increase was partially offset by the substantial completion of a bridge rehabilitation project in New York, reduced activity on a large tunnel project in California, and several smaller civil and mining projects in the Midwest and on the East Coast.

Building Segment

Building segment revenues were $1,552.0 million in 2013, consistent with $1,592.5 million in 2012. The Building segment experienced increased activity on hospitality and gaming projects in California, Arizona and Nevada, courthouse projects in California and Florida, the Hudson Yards project in New York, and a containerized housing project in Iraq. These increases were offset by reduced activity on several building projects in the southern U.S. in 2013 and reduced activity on several large healthcare projects in California.

Specialty Contractors Segment

Specialty Contractors segment revenues were $1,182.3 million in 2013, consistent with $1,183.0 million in 2012. The Specialty Contractors segment experienced increased activity on various electrical projects on the West Coast and in the southern U.S., and on work performed in New York in connection with damage caused by Hurricane Sandy. These increases were offset by reduced activity on several electrical and mechanical projects in New York and on various smaller concrete placement projects on the east and west coasts.

35


Table of Contents

Income (Loss) from Construction Operations

The following table summarizes our income (loss) from construction operations by business segment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Construction Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and Operating Margins before

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment Charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Change in

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Amount

 

Margin

(dollars in millions)

 

Amount

 

Margin

 

Amount

 

Margin

 

$

 

%

 

%

Civil

 

$

177.7 

 

12.3 

%

 

$

118.7 

 

8.9 

%

 

$

59.0 

 

49.7 

%

 

3.4 

%

Building

 

 

24.5 

 

1.6 

%

 

 

2.1 

 

0.1 

%

 

 

22.4 

 

1,066.7 

%

 

1.5 

%

Specialty Contractors

 

 

49.0 

 

4.1 

%

 

 

79.1 

 

6.7 

%

 

 

(30.1)

 

(38.1)

%

 

(2.6)

%

 

 

 

251.2 

 

6.0 

%

 

 

199.9 

 

4.9 

%

 

 

51.3 

 

25.7 

%

 

1.1 

%

Corporate

 

 

(47.4)

 

(1.1)

%

 

 

(45.1)

 

(1.1)

%

 

 

(2.3)

 

5.1 

%

 

 —

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from construction operations before impairment charges

 

 

203.8 

 

4.9 

%

 

 

154.8 

 

3.8 

%

 

 

49.0 

 

31.6 

%

 

1.1 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

82.5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

282.6 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Contractors

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

11.5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

376.6 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from construction operations

 

$

203.8 

 

 

 

 

$

(221.8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment

Civil segment income from construction operations was $177.7 million in 2013, an increase of $59.0 million, or 49.7%,  compared to $118.7 million in 2012. The increase was due primarily to the increase in volume discussed above under Revenues and favorable productivity on an aircraft parking apron project in Guam.

Civil segment operating margin increased from 8.9% in 2012 to 12.3% in 2013 due primarily to an increased mix of higher-margin civil projects in certain parts of the U.S.

Building Segment

Building segment income from construction operations was $24.5 million in 2013, an increase of $22.4 million, or 1066.7%,  compared to an income of $2.1 million in 2012. The increase was due primarily to the volume changes discussed above under Revenues, an increase in estimated recoveries on a certain large hospitality and gaming project in Nevada, certain unrecoverable costs incurred in 2012 related to an educational facility in Alabama, and a decrease in general and administrative expenses in 2013 due primarily to staffing reductions and increased staff utilization. Building segment operating margin increased from 0.1% in 2012 to 1.6% in 2013 due primarily to the reasons discussed above.

Specialty Contractors Segment

Specialty Contractors segment income from construction operations was $49.0 million in 2013, a decrease of $30.1 million, or 38.1%, as compared to $79.1 million in 2012. The decrease in income from construction operations during 2013 was primarily driven by the changes in Revenues discussed above, favorable productivity in 2012 on several electrical and mechanical projects in New York, as well as changes to certain project cost estimates associated with unfavorable execution issues on various smaller concrete placement projects. The decrease was partially offset by work performed in New York in connection with damage caused by Hurricane Sandy and a favorable settlement related to a large hospitality and gaming electrical subcontract.

Specialty Contractors segment operating margin decreased from 6.7% in 2012 to 4.1% in 2013 due primarily to the above-mentioned reasons.

36


Table of Contents

Corporate

Corporate general and administrative expenses were $47.4 million in 2013, an increase of $2.3 million, or 5.1%, compared to $45.1 million in 2012. The increase was due primarily to increased performance-based incentive compensation expense.

Other Income (Expense), Interest Expense and Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

Other Income (Expense), net

 

$

(18.6)

 

$

(1.9)

 

$

(16.7)

 

(878.9)

%

Interest Expense

 

 

45.6 

 

 

44.2 

 

 

1.4 

 

3.2 

%

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

 

 

52.3 

 

 

(2.4)

 

 

54.7 

 

2,279.2 

%

Other income (expense), net, increased by $16.7 million, or 878.9%, during 2013 compared to 2012 due primarily to a net increase in certain business acquisition-related expenses in 2013.

Interest expense increased by $1.4 million, or 3.2%, during 2013 compared to 2012 due primarily to additional borrowings on our revolving line of credit.

The provision for income taxes was $52.3 million during 2013 compared to a  benefit of $2.4 million during 2012. The effective income rate increased from 0.9% in 2012 to 37.5% in 2013 was due primarily to the $376.6 million impairment charge in the second quarter of 2012 and discrete items. The income tax expense for 2013 include discrete items of $(1.1) million related mainly to favorable federal and state audit settlements, and $0.9 million related to 2012 return true-up adjustments, compared to $3.6 million for 2012 related mainly to stock-based compensation items.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Working Capital



Cash and cash equivalents consistwere $192.9 million as of amounts held by us as well as our proportionate share of amounts held by construction joint ventures. Cash held by us is available for general corporate purposes, while cash held by construction joint ventures is available only for joint venture-related uses. Joint venture cash and cash equivalents are not restricted to specific uses within those entities; however, the terms of the joint venture agreements limit our ability to distribute those funds and use them for corporate purposes. Cash held by construction joint ventures is distributed from time to time to us and to the other joint venture participants in accordance with our respective percentage interest after the joint venture partners determine that a cash distribution is prudent. Cash distributions received by us from our construction joint ventures are then available for general corporate purposes.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, cash held by us and2017 compared to $146.1 million as of December 31, 2016. Cash available for general corporate purposes was $40.8$94.7 million and $36.6$49.5 million respectively. Ouras of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with the remainder being our proportionate share of cash held by our unconsolidated joint ventures and also amounts held by our consolidated joint ventures, which, in both cases, were available only for joint venture-related uses, including distributions to joint venture partners was $94.7of $98.2 million and $83.3$96.6 million, respectively. In addition, our restricted cash and restricted investments, held primarily to secure insurance-related contingent obligations, were $4.8 million and $53.0 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2017 compared to restricted cash of $50.5 million as of December 31, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash provided by operating activities was $163.6 million, due primarily to cash generated from income sources partially offset by changes in net investment in working capital. The change in working capital primarily reflects an increase in accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings, which was mostly offset by an increase in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $113.3 million in cash was provided from operating activities, primarily due to favorable operating results, somewhat offset by changes in net investment in working capital. The change in working capital primarily reflected increases in accounts receivable (both trade accounts receivable and retention) related to billing activity, offset by a reduction of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings.  

Cash flow from operations for 2017 was a record high for the Company since the 2008 merger. In addition, for the second consecutive year the Company’s cash flow from operations exceeded its net income. The $50.2 million improvement in cash flow from operations for 2017 compared to 2016 was due to a lower net investment in working capital, which reflects management’s continued focus on improving the Company’s billing and collection cycle. Cash flow from operations for 2016 increased $99.3 million compared to 2015. The increase reflected improved year-over-year profitability and lower net investment in working capital resulting from a significant reduction in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings. The improvement in cash generation in 2016 compared to 2015 was even more pronounced when considering there were significant collections by the Company in the first quarter of 2015 related to the settlements of past disputes over the CityCenter project in Las Vegas, Nevada and a hospital project in Santa Monica, California.

During 2017 and 2016, we used $41.4 million and $18.5 million of cash from investing activities, respectively. Net cash used in both years was primarily due to the acquisition of property and equipment.

During 2017, we utilized $75.4 million of cash from financing activities, primarily due to the net paydown of debt, $17.5 million distributions paid to noncontrolling interests and the payment of $15.3 million in debt issuance and extinguishment costs related to the debt restructuring transactions. Net cash used in financing activities for 2016 was $24.2 million, which was primarily due to the net pay down of debt and the payment of $15.1 million in debt issuance costs associated with two amendments to the 2014 Credit Facility and the issuance of $200.0 million of Convertible Notes.

As of December 31, 2017, we had working capital of $1.5 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.94 and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.43 compared to working capital of $1.3 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.87 and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.49 at December 31, 20142016.

Due to the enactment of the TCJA, as discussed in Corporate, Tax and 2013, respectively, andOther Matters, we expect that our restrictedfuture cash was $44.4 million and $42.6 million, atrequirements for income taxes will decrease as a result of the reduction of the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% that became effective January 1, 2018.

Debt

Summarized below are the key terms of our debt as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.2017. For additional information, refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, as applicable.



We do not believe that it is likely that we will be called upon to contribute significant additional capital in the event of default by any of our joint venture partners. We require each partner in the joint ventures in which we participate to accept joint and several responsibility for all obligations of the joint venture. Prior to forming a joint venture, we conduct a thorough analysis of the prospective partner to determine its capabilities, specifically relating to construction expertise, track record for delivering a quality product on time, reputation in the industry, as well as financial strength and available liquidity. We utilize a number of resources to verify a potential joint venture partner’s financial condition, including credit rating reports and financial information contained in its audited financial statements. We specifically review a potential partner’s available liquidity and bonding capacity. In the event we are concerned with the financial viability of a potential partner, we will require substantial cash contributions upon inception of the joint venture to mitigate the risk that we would be required to cover a disproportionate share of the joint venture’s future cash needs.2017 Credit Facility



On April 20, 2017, we entered into a credit agreement (the “2017 Credit Facility”) with SunTrust Bank as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. The majority of our joint venture contracts are2017 Credit Facility provides for various government agencies that typically require the joint venture and/or our partners to complete a thorough pre-qualification process. This pre-qualification process typically includes the verification of each partner’s financial condition and capacity to perform the work, as well as the issuance of performance bonds by surety companies who also independently verify each partner’s financial condition.

Billing procedures in the construction industry are based on the specific billing terms of a contract. For example, billings may be based on various measures of performance, such as cubic yards excavated, architect’s estimates of completion, costs incurred on cost-plus type contracts or weighted progress from a cost loaded construction time schedule. Billings are generally on a monthly basis and are reviewed and approved by the customer prior to submission. Therefore, once a bill is submitted, we are generally able to collect$350 million revolving

3725

 


 

Table of Contents

 

amounts owedcredit facility (the “2017 Revolver”) and a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit and swingline loans up to us in accordance with the payment termsaggregate amount of $150 million and $10 million, respectively, both maturing on April 20, 2022 unless any of the contract.Convertible Notes are outstanding on December 17, 2020, in which case all such borrowings will mature on December 17, 2020 (subject to certain further exceptions). In addition, receivablesthe 2017 Credit Facility permits additional borrowings in an aggregate amount of a contractor usually include retentions,$150 million, which can be in the form of increased capacity on the 2017 Revolver or amounts that are held back until contracts are completedthe establishment of one or until specified contract conditions or guarantees are met. Retentions are governed by contract provisions and are typically a fixed percentage (for example, 5% or 10%) of each billing. We generally follow the policy of paying our vendors and subcontractors after we receive payment from our customer.more term loans.



A summary of cash flowsThe table below presents our actual and required consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio and consolidated leverage ratio under the 2017 Credit Facility for each of fiscal years 2014,  2013, and 2012 is set forth below:

the period, which are calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(In millions)

Cash flows provided (used) by:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

(56.7)

 

$

50.7 

 

$

(67.9)

Investing activities

 

 

(27.0)

 

 

(43.6)

 

 

(16.8)

Financing activities

 

 

99.3 

 

 

(55.2)

 

 

48.5 

Net increase (decrease) in cash

 

 

15.6 

 

 

(48.1)

 

 

(36.2)

Cash at beginning of year

 

 

119.9 

 

 

168.0 

 

 

204.2 

Cash at end of year

 

$

135.5 

 

$

119.9 

 

$

168.0 

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2017

Actual

Required

Fixed charge coverage ratio

2.63 to 1.00

> or = 1.25 : 1.00

Leverage ratio

2.45 to 1.00

< or = 4.00 : 1.00



During 2014,As of the filing date of this Form 10-K, we used $56.7 millionare in cash from operating activities due primarilycompliance and expect to the timing of collections in the Specialty and Building segments and cash payments for interest on our outstanding debt and income taxes. We used $27.0 million in cash from investing activities due primarilycontinue to the purchase of construction equipment of $75.0 million offset by the proceeds from the sale of our ARS of $44.5 million, and proceeds from the sale of construction equipment of $5.3 million. We received $99.3 million in cash from financing activities, due primarily to borrowings under our revolving facility offset by cash used for scheduled debt repayments and business acquisition related payments.

During 2013, we generated $50.7 million in cash from operating activities, due primarily to net income earned and payments received related to the CityCenter matter, offset by cash paid for interest and taxes and payments related to the Brightwater matter. See Note 8 — Contingencies and Commitments of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules for more information on Brightwater and CityCenter. We used $43.6 million in cash from investing activities, due primarily to the purchase of construction equipment of $42.4 million. We used $55.2 million in cash from financing activities, due primarily to net debt repayments of $23.5 million and business acquisition related payments of $31.0 million.

During 2012, we used $67.9 million in cash to fund operating activities, due primarily to the timing of collections in the Building segment and cash payments for interest on our outstanding debt and income taxes. We used $16.8 million in cash from investing activities, due primarily to purchase construction equipment, offset by the proceeds from the sales of several of our ARS and construction equipment. We received $48.5 million in cash from financing activities, due primarily to borrowings under our revolving facility offset by cash used for scheduled debt repayments and business acquisition related payments.

At December 31, 2014, we had working capital of $1.1 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.82, and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.63 compared to working capital of $0.8 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.61 and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.59 at December 31, 2013. Our stockholders’ equity increased to $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2014, compared to $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2014, we werebe in compliance with the financial covenants under our credit agreement.the 2017 Credit Facility.



2017 Senior Notes

On April 20, 2017, we issued $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “2017 Senior Notes”) in a private placement. Interest on the 2017 Senior Notes is payable in arrears semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on November 1, 2017.

Repurchase and Redemption of 2010 Senior Notes and Termination of 2014 Credit Facility

We used proceeds from the 2017 Senior Notes and 2017 Revolver to repurchase or redeem our 2010 Senior Notes, to pay off our Term Loan and 2014 Revolver, as well as to pay accrued but unpaid interest and fees. In addition, we satisfied and discharged the indenture governing the 2010 Senior Notes and terminated the 2014 Credit Facility.

Convertible Notes

On June 15, 2016, we completed an offering of $200 million of 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2021 (the “Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on December 15, 2016, until the maturity date. As of December 31, 2017, none of the conversion provisions of our Convertible Notes have been triggered.

Equipment financing and mortgages

We have certain loans entered into for the purchase of specific property, plant and equipment and secured by the assets purchased. The aggregate balance of equipment financing loans was approximately $61.1 million and $84.9 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with interest rates ranging from 1.90% to 5.93% with equal monthly installment payments over periods up to ten years with additional balloon payments of $12.4 million in 2021 and $6.3 million in 2022 on the remaining loans outstanding at December 31, 2017. The aggregate balance of mortgage loans was approximately $15.7 million and $16.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with interest rates ranging from a fixed 2.50% to LIBOR plus 3% and equal monthly installment payments over periods up to seven years with additional balloon payments of $2.6 million in 2018, $2.9 million in 2021 and $7.0 million in 2023.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



Except for one immaterial variable interest entity, we do not have financial partnerships with unconsolidated entities, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities which are often established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. The one variable interest entity in which we participate does not pose off-balance sheet arrangements or increased risk due to our participation. Accordingly, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise from such relationships.None

Debt

Debt was $865.4 million at December 31, 2014, an increase of $131.5 million from $733.9 million at December 31, 2013,  due primarily to the net increase of $127.5 million in borrowings on our term loan partially offset by a $5.0 million decrease in our revolving credit facility. We utilized the revolving facility for outstanding letters of credit in the amount of $1.0 million. Accordingly, at December 31, 2014, we had $169.0 million available to borrow under our credit agreement.

Excluding the outstanding borrowings of $130.0 million on our revolving line of credit, unsecured senior notes of $298.8 million and our $250 million term loan (which had been paid down to $242.5 million as of December 31, 2014), the remaining balance of $194.1 

3826

 


 

Table of Contents

 

million of our outstanding debt is generally secured by the underlying assets. Our debt to equity ratio was 0.63 to 1.00 as of December 31, 2014 compared to 0.59 to 1.00 as of December 31, 2013.

Amended Credit Agreement

On August 2, 2012, we entered into a First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to our Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) entered into on August 3, 2011 as Borrower, with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer. The First Amendment modified the financial covenants under the Credit Agreement to allow for more favorable minimum net worth, minimum fixed charge and maximum leverage ratios for us and also to add several new financial covenants including minimum liquidity and a consolidated senior leverage ratio. The First Amendment also modified the applicable interest rates for amounts outstanding under the credit facility as well as the quarterly fees per annum for the unused portion of the credit facility.

On June 5, 2014, we entered into a Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, (the “Credit Facility”) restructuring our former $300 million revolving credit facility and $200 million Term Loan. All outstanding amounts under the Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were repaid in full using proceeds of the Credit Facility. The new agreement provides for a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility") and a $250 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) with Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. The Term Loan principal is to be repaid on a quarterly basis, with 6.0% of the original total outstanding principal repaid in year 1, 9.0% in year 2, 12.0% in year 3, 15.0% in year 4 and 13.5% in year 5 along with a balloon payment of the remaining 44.5% due at maturity. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest based either on Bank of America’s prime lending rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin. Borrowings under the Term Loan bear interest based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin. Included in the Credit Facility is a special provision allowing an additional accordion provision, which we may opt to utilize at a future date to increase either the Revolving Credit Facility or establish one or more new term loan commitments, up to an aggregate amount not to exceed $300 million. The Credit Facility provides a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit up to the aggregate amount of $150 million. Both the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan mature on June 5, 2019.

The Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan include usual and customary covenants for credit facilities of this type, including covenants providing maximum allowable ranges of consolidated leverage ratios from 3.75:1.00 to 2.75:1.00 over a range of five years and maintaining a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1.00. The Credit Facility eliminated the other covenant requirements that were formerly held under the Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.

Substantially all of our subsidiaries unconditionally guarantee our obligations under the Credit Facility. The obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a lien on all personal property of the Company and our subsidiaries party thereto. Any outstanding loans under the Revolving Facility and the Term Loan mature on June 5, 2019. The Term Loan balance was $242.5 million at December 31, 2014. The first quarterly term loan payment under the Credit Facility was due and paid on September 30, 2014. We were in compliance with the modified financial covenants under the Credit Facility for the period ended December 31, 2014.

We had $130.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2014 and $135.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the former Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2013. The net change in borrowings under the Revolving Facility comprises all “Proceeds from debt” and a significant portion of all “Repayment of debt” as presented in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows. We utilized the Revolving Facility for letters of credit in the amount of $1.0 million as of December 31, 2014 and $0.2 million under the former Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2013. Accordingly, at December 31, 2014, we had $169.0 million available to borrow under the Revolving Facility.

On August 26, 2011, we entered into a swap agreement (“Swap Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A. to establish a long-term interest rate for the Term Loan discussed above. The Swap Agreement pertains to the Term Loan principal balance outstanding at January 31, 2012 and will remain effective through the maturity date in June 2016.. Amounts outstanding under the Swap Agreement will bear interest at a rate equal to, the Applicable Rate, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement (based upon our consolidated leverage ratio) plus 97.5 basis points. The Swap Agreement includes quarterly installments of principal and monthly installments of interest payable through the maturity date.

7.625% Senior Notes due 2018

On October 20, 2010, we completed a private placement offering of $300 million in aggregate principal amount of our 7.625% senior unsecured notes due November 1, 2018 (the “Senior Notes”). The Senior Notes were priced at 99.258%, resulting in a yield to maturity of 7.75%. The Senior Notes were made available in a private offering that is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The private placement of the Senior Notes resulted in proceeds to us of approximately $293.2 million after a debt discount of $2.2 million and initial debt issuance costs of $4.6 million. The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture (the “Indenture”), dated as of October 20, 2010 by and among us, our subsidiary guarantors and Wilmington Trust FSB, as trustee (the “Trustee”).

The Senior Notes mature on November 1, 2018, and bear interest at a rate of 7.625% per annum, payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on May 1, 2011. The Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and

39


Table of Contents

are guaranteed by substantially all of our existing and future subsidiaries that guarantee obligations under our Amended Credit Agreement.

The terms of the Indenture, among other things, limit our ability and our restricted subsidiaries to (i) incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred stock; (ii) pay dividends on, or make distributions in respect of, our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock; (iii) make certain investments or other restricted payments; (iv) sell certain assets; (v) create liens or use assets as security in other transactions; (vi) merge, consolidate or transfer or dispose of substantially all of our assets; and (vii) engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

The Senior Notes became redeemable, in whole or in part, on and at any time after November 1, 2014, at the redemption prices specified in the Indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control triggering event specified in the Indenture, we must offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase.

The Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), which include nonpayment, breach of covenants in the Indenture, payment defaults or acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes may declare the principal, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on all the Senior Notes to be due and payable.

Debt Agreements from Acquisitions

In connection with the acquisition of Lunda, we issued to the former Lunda shareholders promissory notes in an aggregate amount of approximately $21.7 million (the “Lunda Seller Notes”). Interest under the Lunda Seller Notes accrues at the rate of 5% per annum with all accrued but unpaid interest payable annually. The Lunda Seller Notes mature on July 1, 2016. We may prepay all or any portion of the Lunda Seller Notes at any time without premium or penalty. To the extent that the Company prepays all or any portion of its outstanding Senior Notes, it is also required to repay a pro rata portion (based upon the amount being prepaid under the Senior Notes and the total amount outstanding under the Senior Notes) of the Lunda Seller Notes. The Lunda Seller Notes are guaranteed by Lunda, which, as a result of the acquisition, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

Collateralized Loans

During 2014 and 2013,  we entered into several equipment financing arrangements for our existing and recently acquired equipment fleets as discussed in more detail below. We attempted to take advantage of the opportunity to fix low interest rates for these fleets which have provided additional cash flows available for general corporate purposes.

During 2014, we obtained equipment financing totaling $46.5 million at fixed rates ranging from 2.12% to 2.69%, payable in equal monthly installments for forty-eight to sixty months.

During 2013, we obtained equipment financing totaling $25.8 million at fixed rates ranging from 2.28% to 3.09%, payable in equal monthly installments for sixty months. We obtained a mortgage loan of $9.6 million collateralized by land and improvements located in Houston, Texas, with equal monthly installments over a 30-year period at LIBOR plus 3.00% with a balloon payment of $6.7 million due in 2023.

40


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations



Our outstanding contractual obligations as of December 31, 20142017 are summarized in the following table:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Less Than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More Than

 

 

Total

 

1 Year

 

1-3 Years

 

3-5 Years

 

5 Years

Total debt, excluding interest

 

$

865,359 

 

$

73,184 

 

$

145,680 

 

$

486,245 

 

$

160,250 

Interest payments on debt

 

 

223,436 

 

 

44,357 

 

 

78,083 

 

 

40,701 

 

 

60,295 

Operating leases, net

 

 

98,930 

 

 

22,286 

 

 

31,213 

 

 

15,781 

 

 

29,650 

Purchase obligations (a)

 

 

4,767 

 

 

1,094 

 

 

874 

 

 

896 

 

 

1,903 

Acquisition-related liabilities

 

 

32,814 

 

 

11,244 

 

 

21,570 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Unfunded pension liability

 

 

34,879 

 

 

6,288 

 

 

12,752 

 

 

13,201 

 

 

2,638 

Insurance claim payable (b)

 

 

36,897 

 

 

7,378 

 

 

7,378 

 

 

7,379 

 

 

14,762 

Other

 

 

10,205 

 

 

1,727 

 

 

1,502 

 

 

6,976 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations

 

$

1,307,287 

 

$

167,558 

 

$

299,052 

 

$

571,179 

 

$

269,498 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Payments Due

(in thousands)

Total

 

1 year or less

 

2-3 years

 

4-5 years

 

Over 5 years

Debt(a)

$

781,907 

 

$

30,748 

 

$

17,515 

 

$

226,325 

 

$

507,319 

Interest on debt(a)

 

478,045 

 

 

42,279 

 

 

83,143 

 

 

272,307 

 

 

80,316 

Operating leases

 

66,486 

 

 

18,420 

 

 

21,404 

 

 

11,764 

 

 

14,898 

Pension benefit payments(b)

 

3,569 

 

 

2,899 

 

 

670 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Other

 

9,612 

 

 

5,666 

 

 

3,946 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total

$

1,339,619 

 

$

100,012 

 

$

126,678 

 

$

510,396 

 

$

602,533 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

______________

(a)

Purchase obligations consists primarilyDebt and interest on debt exclude unamortized debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs. Amounts for interest on debt are based on interest rates in effect as of software licensing and maintenance contracts.December 31, 2017.

(b)

The insurance claim payable representsCompany utilizes current actuarial assumptions in determining the expected insurance loss amountsminimum contributions to fund our defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans. Estimated contributions for periods beyond the scope of the actuarial assumptions have not been included because, in management’s judgment, such estimates may not be received from the insurance carriers and to be paid in claims respectively.reliable.



Stockholders’ EquityCritical Accounting Policies



Our book value per common share was $28.06 at December 31, 2014, compared to $25.76 at December 31, 2013,discussion and $24.05 at December 31, 2012. The major factors impacting stockholders’ equity during the three year period were the net income (loss) recordedanalysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in all three years; the annual amortization of stock compensation expense; common stock options exercised; and the excess income tax benefit attributable to stock-based compensation. Also, we were  required to adjust our accrued pension liability by a increase of  $13.9 millionaccordance with GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are described in 2014, an decrease of $18.7 million in 2013, an increase of  $1.7 million in 2012,  and a cumulative increase of  $59.3 million in prior years, with the offset to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) which resulted in an aggregate $56.2 million  pretax accumulated other comprehensive loss reduction in stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2014 (see Note 7 — Employee Benefit Plans 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are based on information available through the date of the issuance of the financial statements; accordingly, actual results in Part IV, Item 15. Exhibitsfuture periods could differ from these estimates. Significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules). AdjustmentsStatements apply to the amountfollowing critical accounting policies:

Method of this accrued pensionAccounting for Contracts — Contract revenue is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method based on contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost. The estimates used in the percentage-of-completion method during the contract performance period require judgment and assumptions regarding both future events and the evaluation of contingencies such as the impact of change orders, liability will be recordedclaims, other contract disputes, the achievement of contractual performance standards, and potential variances in future years based upon periodic re-evaluation ofproject schedule and costs. Changes to the funded status of our pension plans.total estimated contract cost, either due to unexpected events or revisions to management’s initial estimates, for a given project are recognized in the period in which they are determined.



Related Party TransactionsIn certain instances, we provide guaranteed completion dates and/or achievement of other performance criteria. Failure to meet schedule or performance guarantees could result in unrealized incentive fees and/or liquidated damages. In addition, depending on the type of contract, unexpected increases in contract cost may be unrecoverable, resulting in total cost exceeding revenue realized from the projects. The Company generally provides limited warranties for work performed, with warranty periods typically extending for a limited duration following substantial completion of the Company’s work on a project. Historically, warranty claims have not resulted in material costs incurred.

��

Claims arising from construction contracts have been made against the Company by customers, and the Company has made claims against customers for cost incurred in excess of current contract provisions. The Company recognizes revenue, but not profit, for claims when it is determined that recovery of incurred cost is probable and the amounts can be reliably estimated. These requirements are satisfied under GAAP’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-35, Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts,  when the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim, additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and not the result of deficiencies in the Company’s performance, claim-related costs are identifiable and considered reasonable in view of the work performed, and evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable.



WeConstruction Joint Ventures Certain contracts are subjectexecuted through joint ventures. The arrangements are often formed for the single business purpose of executing a specific project and allow the Company to certain related party transactions with our Chairmanshare risks and Chief Executive Officer, Ronald N. Tutor, and Raymond R. Oneglia, the Vice Chairman of O&G Industries, Inc., one of our directors. A more detailed description of these transactions will be set forth in the sections entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” in the definitive proxy statement in connection with our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), which section is incorporated herein by reference.

New Accounting Pronouncementssecure specialty skills required for project execution.



In February 2013,accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”) the FASB issued ASU 2013-04 Liabilities (Topic 405), which provides guidance forCompany assesses its joint ventures at inception to determine if any meet the recognition, measurement, and disclosurequalifications of obligations resulting froma variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company considers a joint and several liability arrangements for whichventure a VIE if either (a) the total amountequity investment is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) characteristics of a controlling financial interest are missing (either the ability to make decisions through voting or other rights, the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the obligation withinentity or the scope of this guidance is fixed atright to receive the reporting date. This ASU is an update to FASB ASC Topic 405, “Liabilities”. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensusexpected residual returns of the Emerging Issues Task Force). This ASU addresses when unrecognized tax benefits should be presented as reductionsentity), or (c) the voting rights of the equity holders are not proportional to deferred tax assets for net operating loss carryforwards intheir obligations to absorb the financial statements. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within thoseexpected losses of the entity and/or their rights to

4127

 


 

Table of Contents

 

years, beginning after December 15, 2013. receive the expected residual returns of the entity and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. Upon the occurrence of certain events outlined in ASC 810, the Company reassesses its initial determination of whether the joint venture is a VIE.

The adoptionCompany also evaluates whether it is the primary beneficiary of this guidance dideach VIE and consolidates the VIE if the Company has both (a) the power to direct the economically significant activities of the entity and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company considers the contractual agreements that define the ownership structure, distribution of profits and losses, risks, responsibilities, indebtedness, voting rights and board representation of the respective parties in determining whether it qualifies as the primary beneficiary. The Company also considers all parties that have direct or implicit variable interests when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary. When the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary, the VIE is consolidated. As required by ASC 810, management’s assessment of whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE is continuously performed.

For construction joint ventures that do not have a material impact onneed to be fully consolidated, the Company accounts for its interest in the joint ventures using the proportionate consolidation method, whereby the Company’s proportionate share of the joint ventures’ assets, liabilities, revenue and cost of operations are included in the appropriate classifications in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. See Note 1(b) and Note 11 for additional discussion regarding VIEs.



Recoverability of Goodwill — Goodwill represents the excess of amounts paid over the fair value of net assets acquired from an acquisition. In May 2014,order to determine the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2014-09, Revenueamount of goodwill resulting from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), an acquisition, we perform an assessment to determine the value of the acquired company's tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities. In our assessment, we determine whether identifiable intangible assets exist, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU addresses when an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period, using one of two retrospective application methods. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this ASU will have on its financial statements.typically include backlog, customer relationships and trade name.



In June 2014,We test goodwill for impairment annually in the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accountingfourth quarter of the fiscal year for Share-Based Payments Wheneach of our Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors operating segments, which are the Termssame as our reporting units for goodwill impairment analysis. This test requires us to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit, using income and market approaches and to compare the calculated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, which is equal to the reporting unit’s net assets. If the calculated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we perform a second step involving a hypothetical purchase allocation for that reporting unit resulting in an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved afterimplied fair value of the Requisite Service Period, clarifyingreporting unit’s goodwill. If the recognition timingimplied fair value is less than the carrying value of expense associated with certaingoodwill, an impairment charge equal to the difference is recognized. Additionally, in the quarters preceding the fourth quarter, we evaluate events and circumstances, such as changes in the legal environment and business climate, the operating performance based stock awards whenof the reporting units and general industry trends, to determine if such factors indicate that it is likely that the goodwill for one or more of our reporting units is impaired, thus warranting the performance targetof the annual impairment test sooner than the fourth quarter of the year.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, we conducted our annual goodwill impairment test and determined that affects vesting could be achieved afterour goodwill was not impaired. The impairment evaluation process requires assumptions that are subject to a high degree of judgement about variables such as revenue growth rates, profitability levels, discount rates, industry market multiples and weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Changes in these variables would impact the requisite service period. This ASU is an updateresults of our impairment tests. For example, as of October 1, 2017, changes of 0.5% in the WACC would have resulted in changes in the fair value of reporting units ranging from $(30.0) million to FASB ASC Topic 718$40.0 million, which would not have changed the conclusions reached in our annual goodwill impairment test.

New Accounting Pronouncements — For discussion of recently adopted accounting standards and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015 with earlier adoption permitted.  The adoptionupdates, see Note 1 of this guidance is not expectedthe Notes to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

  

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK



Our exposure toInterest rate risk is our primary market risk for changesexposure. Borrowing under our 2017 Credit Facility and certain other debt obligations have variable interest rates subject to interest rate risk. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $8.4 million of net borrowings with variable interest rates. If short-term floating interest rates were to increase by 0.50%, the change in interest rates primarily relates toon these borrowings under our Amended Credit Agreement, our Term Loan, and our short-term and long-term investment portfolios. Our Revolving Facility is available for us to borrow, when needed, for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements and capital expenditures. Borrowings under our Revolving Facility and outstanding principal on our Term Loan bear interest at the applicable LIBOR or base rate, as defined, and therefore we are subject to fluctuations in interest rates. We borrowed on the revolving line of credit in 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Accordingly, we do not believe our liquidity or our operations are subject to significant market risk for changes in interest rates.

would increase by approximately $50,000.

  

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA



The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Schedules are set forth in Item 15 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

  

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE



None.

28


Table of Contents

  

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has carried out anAn evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2014.2017 was made under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2014,2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act were recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.SEC’s rules. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.



Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(f)13a-15(f). In designing and evaluating our system of internal control over financial reporting, we recognize that inherent limitations exist in any control system no matter how well designed and operated, and we can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In making this assessment, management utilized the criteria issued in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issuedby the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework).  Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2014,2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.



42


Table of Contents

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.



Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2017.



Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting - There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20142017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



4329

 


 

Table of Contents

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Tutor Perini Corporation

Sylmar, California

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting



We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Tutor Perini Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 2014,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our report dated February 27, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion 

The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.



We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.



Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 of the Company and our report dated February 26, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



Los Angeles, California



February 26, 201527, 2018



4430

 


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION



None.Departure of Director



On February 21, 2018, Thomas C. Leppert notified the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Tutor Perini Corporation of his decision to resign from the Board, effective immediately.

Concurrent with Mr. Leppert’s departure, the Board approved a reduction in the size of the Board from twelve to eleven members.



PART III.



ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE



The information required by this Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 2014.2017.

  

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION



The information required by this Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 2014.2017.

  

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS



The information required by this Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 2014.2017.

  

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE



The information required by this Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 2014.2017.

  

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES



The information required by this Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 2014.2017.

  

4531

 


 

Table of Contents

 

PART IV.



ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES



TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



(a)1.The following           Financial Statements:

Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017 and supplementary2016 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and the notes thereto, together with the report of the independent registered public accounting firm on those consolidated financial informationstatements are hereby filed as part of this Annual Report:

Pages

Consolidated Financial Statements of the Registrant

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

4849

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012

50 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012

51 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012

52 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012

53  –  54

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

55 – 104

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

101 

Report on Form 10-K, beginning on page F-1.



(a)2.           Financial Statement Schedules:

All consolidated financial statement schedules are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in theConsolidated Financial Statements orand in the Notes thereto.



(a)3.Exhibits           Exhibits:

EXHIBIT INDEX



The following designated exhibits which are, as indicated below, either filed herewith or have heretofore been filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-Kthe SEC under the Securities Act of 1933 or whichthe Securities Act of 1934 and are referred to and incorporated herein by reference are set forth in the Exhibit Index which appears on pages 102 through 103.to such filings.



Exhibit 3.

Articles of Incorporation and By-laws

3.1

Restated Articles of Organization (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K (File No. 001-06314) filed on March 31, 1997).

3.2

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2000).

3.3

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 11, 2008).

3.4

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-Q filed on August 10, 2009).

3.5

Third Amended and Restated By-laws of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-Q filed on August 2, 2016).

Exhibit 4.

Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

4.1

Shareholders Agreement, dated April 2, 2008, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, Ronald N. Tutor and the shareholders of Tutor-Saliba Corporation signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2008).

4.2

Amendment No. 1 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated September 17, 2010, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor, as shareholder representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2010).

4.3

Amendment No. 2 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated June 2, 2011, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor, as shareholder representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2011).

4.4

Amendment No. 3 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated September 13, 2011, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor, as shareholder representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2011).

4.5

Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 20, 2010, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, certain subsidiary guarantors named therein and the initial purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2010).

4.6

Indenture, dated June 15, 2016, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Wilmington Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2016).

4.7

Indenture, dated April 20, 2017, among Tutor Perini Corporation, the guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2017).

Exhibit 10.

Material Contracts

10.1*

Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 (File No. 333-111338) filed on February 10, 2004).

10.2*

2009 General Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex B to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A filed on April 17, 2009).

32


Table of Contents

10.3*

Amended and Restated Tutor Perini Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended on October 2, 2014 and included as Exhibit A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on October 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.4*

Tutor Perini Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 26, 2017).

10.5*

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2014, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2014).

10.6*

Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 5, 2018, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2018).

10.7

Commercial Lease Agreement, dated April 18, 2014, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014).

10.8

Industrial Lease Agreement, dated April 18, 2014, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation and Kristra Investments, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014).

10.9*

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November 1, 2016, by and between James A. Frost and Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on November 2, 2016).

10.10*

Employment Agreement, dated September 6, 2017, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Gary G. Smalley (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2017).

10.11

Credit Agreement, dated April 20, 2017, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, the subsidiaries of Tutor Perini Corporation identified therein, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, and the other lenders from time to time party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2017).

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Tutor Perini Corporation.

Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Exhibit 24

Power of Attorney executed by members of the Company’s Board of Directors allowing Management to sign the Company’s Form 10-K on their behalf.

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 95

Mine Safety Disclosure.

Exhibit 101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

Exhibit 101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

Exhibit 101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.


*Management contract or compensatory arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K

4633

 


 

Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



5

 

 



Tutor Perini Corporation



(Registrant)



 

Dated: February 26, 201527, 2018

By:

/s/James A. Frost Gary G. Smalley



James A. FrostGary G. Smalley



Executive Vice President and Chief OperatingFinancial Officer



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.





��

 

 

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date



 

 

 

 

Principal Executive Officer and Director

/s/ Ronald N. Tutor

Ronald N. Tutor

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

February 26, 201527, 2018

Principal Financial Officer

/s/ Gary G. Smalley

Gary G. Smalley

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 27, 2018

Principal Accounting Officer

/s/ Ryan J. Soroka

Ryan J. Soroka

Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

February 27, 2018



 

 

 

By:

/s/Ronald N. Tutor

Ronald N. Tutor

Principal Financial OfficerOther Directors

Michael J. Kershaw

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 26, 2015

By:

/s/Michael J. Kershaw

Michael J. Kershaw

 

 

 



 

 

 

Principal Accounting Officer
Ronald P. Marano II

 

Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

February 26, 2015

By:

/s/Ronald P. Marano II

Ronald P. Marano II

Directors

Ronald N. Tutor

)

Marilyn A. Alexander

)

 

 

Peter Arkley

)

 

 

James A. FrostSidney J. Feltenstein

)

 

 

Sidney J. FeltensteinJames A. Frost

)

 

/s/James A. Frost Gary G. Smalley

Michael R. Klein

)

 

James A. FrostGary G. Smalley

Robert C. Lieber

)

 

Attorney in Fact

Dale A. ReissDennis D. Oklak

)

 

 

Raymond R. Oneglia

)

Dale A. Reiss

)

 

 

Donald D. Snyder

)

 

 

Dickran M. Tevrizian, Jr.

)

 

Dated: February 26, 201527, 2018

  

  



 

34


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pages

Consolidated Financial Statements of the Registrant

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Consolidated Statements of Income

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

F-4

Consolidated Balance Sheets

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-8

  

47F-1


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of

Tutor Perini Corporation

Sylmar, California

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tutor Perini Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Los Angeles, California

February 27, 2018

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

F-2


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per common share data)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

REVENUE

$

4,757,208 

 

$

4,973,076 

 

$

4,920,472 

COST OF OPERATIONS

 

(4,302,803)

 

 

(4,515,886)

 

 

(4,564,219)

GROSS PROFIT

 

454,405 

 

 

457,190 

 

 

356,253 

General and administrative expenses

 

(274,928)

 

 

(255,270)

 

 

(250,840)

INCOME FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

 

179,477 

 

 

201,920 

 

 

105,413 

Other income, net

 

43,882 

 

 

6,977 

 

 

13,569 

Interest expense

 

(69,384)

 

 

(59,782)

 

 

(45,143)

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

153,975 

 

 

149,115 

 

 

73,839 

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

569 

 

 

(53,293)

 

 

(28,547)

NET INCOME

$

154,544 

 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

LESS: NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

(6,162)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION

 

148,382 

 

 

95,822 

 

 

45,292 

BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

$

2.99 

 

$

1.95 

 

$

0.92 

DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

$

2.92 

 

$

1.92 

 

$

0.91 

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC

 

49,647 

 

 

49,150 

 

 

48,981 

DILUTED

 

50,759 

 

 

49,864 

 

 

49,666 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

NET INCOME

$

154,544 

 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension plan adjustments

 

1,424 

 

 

(2,623)

 

 

2,026 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

1,273 

 

 

(261)

 

 

(3,214)

Unrealized gain (loss) in fair value of investments

 

(2)

 

 

(340)

 

 

766 

Unrealized loss in fair value of interest rate swap

 

 —

 

 

(24)

 

 

(125)

TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX

 

2,695 

 

 

(3,248)

 

 

(547)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

157,239 

 

 

92,574 

 

 

44,745 

LESS: COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

(6,162)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION

$

151,077 

 

$

92,574 

 

$

44,745 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, including cash equivalents of $12,044 and $6,437

 

$

135,583 

 

 

119,923 

Restricted cash

 

 

44,370 

 

 

42,594 

Accounts receivable, including retainage of $382,891 and $364,239

 

 

1,479,504 

 

 

1,291,246 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

 

726,402 

 

 

573,248 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

17,962 

 

 

8,240 

Other current assets

 

 

68,735 

 

 

50,669 

Total current assets

 

 

2,472,556 

 

 

2,085,920 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS

 

 

 —

 

 

46,283 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

 

41,307 

 

 

41,307 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

120,796 

 

 

118,312 

Construction equipment

 

 

426,379 

 

 

370,452 

Other equipment

 

 

159,148 

 

 

151,847 

 

 

 

747,630 

 

 

681,918 

Less – Accumulated depreciation

 

 

220,028 

 

 

183,793 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total property and equipment, net

 

 

527,602 

 

 

498,125 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GOODWILL

 

 

585,006 

 

 

577,756 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

 

 

100,254 

 

 

113,740 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS

 

 

87,897 

 

 

75,614 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

3,773,315 

 

 

3,397,438 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

48


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

$

81,292 

 

$

114,658 

Accounts payable, including retainage of $142,586 and $137,944

 

 

798,174 

 

 

758,225 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

 

319,296 

 

 

267,586 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

 

159,814 

 

 

158,017 

Total current liabilities

 

 

1,358,576 

 

 

1,298,486 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities

 

 

784,067 

 

 

619,226 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

 

 

150,371 

 

 

114,333 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

 

114,796 

 

 

117,858 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

 

2,407,810 

 

 

2,149,903 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (Note 8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $1 par value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized – 1,000,000 shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and outstanding – none

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Common stock, $1 par value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized – 75,000,000 shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and outstanding – 48,671,492 shares and 48,421,467 shares

 

 

48,671 

 

 

48,421 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

1,025,941 

 

 

1,007,918 

Retained earnings

 

 

332,511 

 

 

224,575 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(41,618)

 

 

(33,379)

Total stockholders' equity

 

 

1,365,505 

 

 

1,247,535 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 

$

3,773,315 

 

$

3,397,438 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,



2017

 

2016

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, including cash equivalents of $1,481 and $15,302 ($53,067 and $0 related to VIEs)

$

192,868 

 

$

146,103 

Restricted cash

 

4,780 

 

 

50,504 

Restricted investments

 

53,014 

 

 

 —

Accounts receivable, including retainage of $535,939 and $569,391 (AR of $42,413 and $0 related to VIEs)

 

1,801,656 

 

 

1,743,300 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

932,758 

 

 

831,826 

Other current assets

 

89,316 

 

 

66,023 

Total current assets

 

3,074,392 

 

 

2,837,756 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

41,382 

 

 

41,382 

Building and improvements

 

125,029 

 

 

124,157 

Construction equipment

 

477,988 

 

 

444,153 

Other equipment

 

182,288 

 

 

181,717 



 

826,687 

 

 

791,409 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(359,188)

 

 

(313,783)

Total property and equipment, net ($11,641 and $0 related to VIEs)

 

467,499 

 

 

477,626 

GOODWILL

 

585,006 

 

 

585,006 

INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

 

89,454 

 

 

92,997 

OTHER ASSETS

 

47,772 

 

 

45,235 

TOTAL ASSETS

$

4,264,123 

 

$

4,038,620 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

$

30,748 

 

$

85,890 

Accounts payable, including retainage of $261,820 and $258,294 (AP of $19,243 and $0 related to VIEs)

 

961,791 

 

 

994,016 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings ($120,952 and $0 related to VIEs)

 

456,869 

 

 

331,112 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

132,438 

 

 

107,925 

Total current liabilities

 

1,581,846 

 

 

1,518,943 

LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities, net of unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs totaling $45,631 and $56,072

 

705,528 

 

 

673,629 

DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES

 

108,504 

 

 

131,007 

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

163,465 

 

 

162,018 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

2,559,343 

 

 

2,485,597 

CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (Note 6)

 

 

 

 

 

EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock – authorized 1,000,000 shares ($1 par value), none issued

 

 —

 

 

 —

Common stock – authorized 75,000,000 shares ($1 par value), issued and outstanding 49,781,010 and 49,211,353 shares

 

49,781 

 

 

49,211 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,084,205 

 

 

1,075,600 

Retained earnings

 

622,007 

 

 

473,625 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(42,718)

 

 

(45,413)

Total stockholders' equity

 

1,713,275 

 

 

1,553,023 

Noncontrolling interests

 

(8,495)

 

 

 —

TOTAL EQUITY

 

1,704,780 

 

 

1,553,023 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

$

4,264,123 

 

$

4,038,620 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

49


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

Revenues

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

4,175,672 

 

$

4,111,471 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of operations

 

 

3,986,867 

 

 

3,708,768 

 

 

3,696,339 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

505,442 

 

 

466,904 

 

 

415,132 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

263,752 

 

 

263,082 

 

 

260,369 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

376,574 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

 

 

241,690 

 

 

203,822 

 

 

(221,811)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other expense, net

 

 

(9,536)

 

 

(18,575)

 

 

(1,857)

Interest expense

 

 

(44,716)

 

 

(45,632)

 

 

(44,174)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) before income taxes

 

 

187,438 

 

 

139,615 

 

 

(267,842)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Provision) benefit for income taxes

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

(52,319)

 

 

2,442 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

 

$

2.22 

 

$

1.82 

 

$

(5.59)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

 

$

(5.59)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC

 

 

48,562 

 

 

47,851 

 

 

47,470 

Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock units

 

 

552 

 

 

738 

 

 

 —

DILUTED

 

 

49,114 

 

 

48,589 

 

 

47,470 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

50


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousandsF-)5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in pension benefit plans assets/liabilities *

 

 

(13,887)

 

 

18,675 

 

 

(1,697)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

(1,086)

 

 

(1,212)

 

 

608 

Change in fair value of investments

 

 

345 

 

 

(744)

 

 

396 

Change in fair value of interest rate swap

 

 

594 

 

 

948 

 

 

(1,659)

Realized loss on sale of investments recorded in  net income (loss)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,224 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before taxes

 

 

(14,034)

 

 

17,667 

 

 

872 

INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax adjustment on minimum pension liability *

 

 

(5,732)

 

 

7,765 

 

 

(87)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

(448)

 

 

(474)

 

 

226 

Change in fair value of investments

 

 

141 

 

 

(189)

 

 

158 

Change in fair value of interest rate swap

 

 

245 

 

 

370 

 

 

(685)

Realized loss on sale of investments recorded in net income (loss)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,219 

Income tax expense

 

 

(5,794)

 

 

7,472 

 

 

831 

NET OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

 

 

(8,240)

 

 

10,195 

 

 

41 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

99,696 

 

$

97,491 

 

$

(265,359)

*See discussion under Defined Benefit Pension Plan in Note 7  — Employee Benefit Plans

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

51


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Common

 

Paid-In

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Loss

 

Total

Balance - December 31, 2011

 

$

47,329 

 

$

993,434 

 

$

402,679 

 

$

(43,615)

 

$

1,399,827 

Net income

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(265,400)

 

 

 —

 

 

(265,400)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

41 

 

 

41 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(265,359)

Tax effect of stock-based compensation

 

 

 —

 

 

(195)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(195)

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 —

 

 

9,470 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,470 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

 

227 

 

 

(106)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

121 

Balance - December 31, 2012

 

$

47,556 

 

$

1,002,603 

 

$

137,279 

 

$

(43,574)

 

$

1,143,864 

Net loss

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

87,296 

 

 

 —

 

 

87,296 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,195 

 

 

10,195 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97,491 

Tax effect of stock-based compensation

 

 

 —

 

 

(7)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(7)

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 —

 

 

6,623 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

6,623 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

 

865 

 

 

(1,301)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(436)

Balance - December 31, 2013

 

$

48,421 

 

$

1,007,918 

 

$

224,575 

 

$

(33,379)

 

$

1,247,535 

Net income

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

107,936 

 

 

 —

 

 

107,936 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(8,240)

 

 

(8,240)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,696 

Tax effect of stock-based compensation

 

 

 —

 

 

786 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

786 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 —

 

 

18,616 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

18,616 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

 

250 

 

 

(1,378)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,128)

Balance - December 31, 2014

 

$

48,671 

 

$

1,025,942 

 

$

332,511 

 

$

(41,619)

 

$

1,365,505 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

52

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twelve months ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013 

 

2012 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

376,574 

Depreciation

 

 

40,216 

 

 

43,383 

 

 

40,583 

Amortization of intangible assets and debt issuance costs

 

 

15,756 

 

 

16,027 

 

 

20,874 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

18,615 

 

 

6,623 

 

 

9,470 

Excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 

 

(787)

 

 

(1,148)

 

 

 —

Deferred income taxes

 

 

21,460 

 

 

9,009 

 

 

(25,606)

Adjustment interest rate swap to fair value

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

264 

Loss on sale of investments

 

 

1,786 

 

 

 —

 

 

2,699 

Loss on sale of property and equipment

 

 

801 

 

 

49 

 

 

316 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

3,074 

 

 

23,107 

 

 

(5,104)

Other non-cash items

 

 

3,273 

 

 

(3,719)

 

 

148 

Cash from changes in other components of working capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(186,384)

 

 

(62,991)

 

 

50,655 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

 

(153,153)

 

 

(107,983)

 

 

(106,604)

Other current assets

 

 

(17,450)

 

 

25,250 

 

 

2,237 

Increase (decrease) in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

 

33,667 

 

 

59,169 

 

 

(89,252)

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

 

51,711 

 

 

(36,835)

 

 

(82,521)

Accrued expenses

 

 

2,801 

 

 

(6,509)

 

 

2,804 

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

(56,678)

 

 

50,728 

 

 

(67,863)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment excluding financed purchases

 

 

(75,013)

 

 

(42,360)

 

 

(41,352)

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

 

5,335 

 

 

2,663 

 

 

11,759 

Investment in available-for-sale securities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(535)

Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities

 

 

44,497 

 

 

 —

 

 

16,553 

Change in restricted cash

 

 

(1,776)

 

 

(3,877)

 

 

(3,280)

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

(26,957)

 

 

(43,574)

 

 

(16,855)



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

53


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

(in thousands)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twelve months ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt

 

 

1,156,739 

 

 

653,280 

 

 

688,425 

Repayment of debt

 

 

(1,026,349)

 

 

(676,795)

 

 

(626,122)

Business acquisition related payments

 

 

(26,430)

 

 

(31,038)

 

 

(11,462)

Excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 

 

787 

 

 

1,148 

 

 

 —

Issuance of Common stock and effect of cashless exercise

 

 

(1,771)

 

 

(1,882)

 

 

(308)

Debt issuance costs

 

 

(3,681)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,999)

NET CASH  PROVIDED (USED) BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

99,295 

 

 

(55,287)

 

 

48,534 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 

15,660 

 

 

(48,133)

 

 

(36,184)

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year

 

 

119,923 

 

 

168,056 

 

 

204,240 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year

 

$

135,583 

 

$

119,923 

 

$

168,056 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Paid For:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

45,236 

 

$

41,207 

 

$

40,183 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes

 

$

75,494 

 

$

28,898 

 

$

16,309 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant date fair value of common stock issued for services

 

$

6,261 

 

$

18,290 

 

$

5,075 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment acquired through financing arrangements not included above

 

$

816 

 

$

16,689 

 

$

2,050 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

154,544 

 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

48,387 

 

 

63,759 

 

 

37,919 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

3,543 

 

 

3,543 

 

 

3,715 

Share-based compensation expense

 

21,174 

 

 

13,423 

 

 

9,477 

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

(269)

 

 

(186)

Change in debt discounts and deferred debt issuance costs

 

17,595 

 

 

10,968 

 

 

2,095 

Deferred income taxes

 

(23,096)

 

 

(10,169)

 

 

22,214 

Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment

 

1,131 

 

 

453 

 

 

(2,909)

Changes in other components of working capital 

 

(60,214)

 

 

(90,530)

 

 

(128,777)

Other long-term liabilities

 

3,656 

 

 

28,210 

 

 

28,912 

Other, net

 

(3,170)

 

 

(1,874)

 

 

(3,680)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

163,550 

 

 

113,336 

 

 

14,072 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment

 

(30,280)

 

 

(15,743)

 

 

(35,912)

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

2,744 

 

 

1,899 

 

 

4,980 

Investments in securities, restricted

 

(54,504)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Investments in securities

 

(6,463)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Proceeds from maturities of investments in securities

 

1,370 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Change in restricted cash

 

45,724 

 

 

(4,651)

 

 

(1,483)

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

(41,409)

 

 

(18,495)

 

 

(32,415)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt

 

2,161,384 

 

 

1,353,895 

 

 

1,013,205 

Repayment of debt

 

(2,195,068)

 

 

(1,562,684)

 

 

(1,054,371)

Debt issuance and extinguishment costs

 

(15,266)

 

 

(15,086)

 

 

 —

Issuance of convertible notes

 

 —

 

 

200,000 

 

 

 —

Cash payments related to share-based compensation

 

(11,769)

 

 

(584)

 

 

(808)

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

269 

 

 

186 

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests

 

(17,499)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 

2,842 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

(75,376)

 

 

(24,190)

 

 

(41,788)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

46,765 

 

 

70,651 

 

 

(60,131)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

146,103 

 

 

75,452 

 

 

135,583 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$

192,868 

 

$

146,103 

 

$

75,452 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

  

  

54F-6

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

[1] Description of BusinCONSOLIDATED STATEMEess and NTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 



Common

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Noncontrolling

 

 

 



Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Loss

 

Interests

 

Total

Balance - December 31, 2014

$

48,671 

 

$

1,025,941 

 

$

332,511 

 

$

(41,618)

 

$

 —

 

$

1,365,505 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

45,292 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

45,292 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(547)

 

 

 —

 

 

(547)

Tax effect of share-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

(186)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(186)

Share-based compensation expense

 

 —

 

 

9,477 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,477 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

402 

 

 

284 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

686 

Balance - December 31, 2015

$

49,073 

 

$

1,035,516 

 

$

377,803 

 

$

(42,165)

 

$

 —

 

$

1,420,227 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

95,822 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

95,822 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,248)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,248)

Tax effect of share-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

(457)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(457)

Share-based compensation expense

 

 —

 

 

13,423 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13,423 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

138 

 

 

676 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

814 

Convertible note proceeds allocated to conversion option, net

 

 —

 

 

26,442 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

26,442 

Balance - December 31, 2016

$

49,211 

 

$

1,075,600 

 

$

473,625 

 

$

(45,413)

 

$

 —

 

$

1,553,023 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

148,382 

 

 

 —

 

 

6,162 

 

 

154,544 

Other comprehensive income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,695 

 

 

 —

 

 

2,695 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 —

 

 

20,877 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

20,877 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

570 

 

 

(12,272)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(11,702)

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,842 

 

 

2,842 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(17,499)

 

 

(17,499)

Balance - December 31, 2017

$

49,781 

 

$

1,084,205 

 

$

622,007 

 

$

(42,718)

 

$

(8,495)

 

$

1,704,780 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.      Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



(a) Nature of Business

Tutor Perini Corporation, formerly known as Perini Corporation, was incorporated in 1918 as a successor to businesses which had been engaged in providing construction services since 1894. Tutor Perini Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) provide diversified general contracting, construction management and design-build services to private customers and public agencies throughout the world. The Company’s construction business is conducted through three basic segments or operations: Civil, Building, and Specialty Contractors. The Civil segment specializes in public works construction and the repair, replacement and reconstruction of infrastructure, including highways, bridges, mass transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities. The Building segment has significant experience providing services to a number of specialized building markets, including the hospitality and gaming, transportation, healthcare, municipal offices, sports and entertainment, educational, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical and high-tech markets. The Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems, and pneumatically placed concrete for a full range of civil and building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass transit end markets, among others.

The Company offers general contracting, pre-construction planning and comprehensive project management services, including planning and scheduling of the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for the timely completion of a project in accordance with the terms and specifications contained in a construction contract. The Company also offers self-performed construction services, including site work, concrete forming and placement, steel erection, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and HVAC. The Company provides these services by using traditional general contracting arrangements, such as fixed price, guaranteed maximum price and cost plus fee contracts.

In an effort to leverage the Company’s expertise and limit its financial and/or operational risk on certain large or complex projects, the Company participates in construction joint ventures, often as the sponsor or manager of the project, for the purpose of bidding and, if awarded, providing the agreed upon construction services. Each participant usually agrees in advance to provide a predetermined percentage of capital, as required, and to share in the same percentage of profit or loss of the project.

(b) Basis of Presentation



The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) as codified in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification.Codification (“ASC”).



(c)(b) Principles of Consolidation



The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tutor Perini Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries.subsidiaries (the “Company”). The Company’s interestsCompany occasionally forms joint ventures with unrelated third parties for the execution of single contracts or projects. The Company assesses its joint ventures at inception to determine if they meet the qualifications of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) in accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”). If a joint venture is a VIE and the Company is the primary beneficiary, the joint venture is fully consolidated (See Note 11 below). For construction joint ventures are accountedthat do not need to be consolidated, the Company accounts for its interest in the joint ventures using the proportionate consolidation method, whereby the Company’s proportionate share of eachthe joint venture’sventures’ assets, liabilities, revenuesrevenue and cost of operations are included in the appropriate classifications in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.



(d)(c) Use of and Changes in Estimates



The preparation of financial statements in conformityaccordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities atamounts. These estimates are based on information available through the date of the issuance of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s construction business involves making significant estimates and assumptions in the normal course of business relating to its contracts and its joint venture contracts due to, among other things, the one-of-a-kind nature of most of its projects, the long-term duration of its contract cycle and the type of contract utilized. The most significant estimates with regard to these financial statements relate to the estimating of total forecasted construction contract revenues, costs and profits in accordance with accounting for long-term contracts and estimating potential liabilities in conjunction with certain contingencies, including the outcome of pending or future litigation, arbitration or other dispute resolution proceedings relating to contract claims. Actualstatements; therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.

(d) Construction Contracts

The Company and its affiliated entities recognize construction contract revenue using the percentage-of-completion method, based primarily on contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost. Cost of revenue includes an allocation of depreciation and amortization. Pre-contract costs are expensed as incurred. Changes to total estimated contract cost or losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are determined.

The Company generally provides limited warranties for work performed under its construction contracts with periods typically extending for a limited duration following substantial completion of the Company’s work on a project. Historically, warranty claims have not resulted in material costs incurred.

The Company classifies as current construction-related assets and liabilities that may be settled beyond one year from the balance sheet date, consistent with the length of time of the Company’s project operating cycle. Included in these estimatesbalances are the following: costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings, which represent the excess of contract costs and profits (or contract revenue) over the amount of contract billings to date; billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings, which represent the excess of contract billings to date over the amount of contract costs and profits (or contract revenue) recognized to date; and contract retainage receivables and payables, which represent amounts invoiced to customers and amounts invoiced to the Company by subcontractors where payments have been withheld pending the completion of certain milestones, other contractual conditions or upon the completion of the project.

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings result when either: 1) the appropriate contract revenue amount has been recognized in accordance with the percentage-of-completion accounting method, but a portion of the revenue recorded cannot be billed currently due to the billing terms defined in the contract, or 2) costs are incurred related to certain claims and unapproved change orders. Claims occur when there is a dispute regarding both a change in the scope of work and the price associated with that change. Unapproved change orders occur when a change in the scope of work results in additional work being performed before the parties have agreed on the corresponding change in the contract price. For both claims and unapproved change orders, the Company recognizes revenue, but not profit, when it is determined that recovery of incurred cost is probable and the amounts can be reliably estimated. For claims, these requirements are satisfied under ASC 605-35, Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, when the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim, additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and not the result of deficiencies in the Company’s performance, claim-related costs are identifiable and considered reasonable in view of the work performed, and evidence supporting the claim or change order is objective and verifiable.

F-8


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings, as reported on the Balance Sheet, consisted of the following:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Claims

$

549,849 

 

$

477,425 

Unapproved change orders

 

296,591 

 

 

207,475 

Other unbilled costs and profits

 

86,318 

 

 

146,926 

Total costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

$

932,758 

 

$

831,826 

Claims and unapproved change orders are billable upon the resolution of any disputed or open items between the contractual parties and the execution of contractual amendments. Increases in claims and unapproved change orders typically result from costs being incurred against existing or new positions where recovery is concluded to be both probable and reliably estimable; decreases normally result from resolutions and subsequent billings. For both claims and unapproved change orders, the Company recognizes revenue, but not profit. Other unbilled costs and profits are billable in accordance with the billing terms of each of the existing contractual arrangements and, as such, differencesthe timing of contract billing cycles can cause fluctuations in the balance of unbilled costs and profits. Ultimate resolution of other unbilled costs and profits typically involves the passage of time and, often, incremental progress toward contractual requirements or milestones. The amount of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings as of December 31, 2017 estimated by management to be collected beyond one year is approximately $443.7 million.

Retainage agreements vary from project to project and balances could be material.outstanding for several months or years depending on a number of circumstances, such as contract-specific terms, project performance and other variables that may arise as the Company makes progress towards completion. Generally, retainage payables are not remitted to the Company’s subcontractors until the associated retainage receivables from the customer are collected. As of December 31, 2017, the amount of retainage receivables and payables estimated by management to be collected or remitted beyond one year is approximately 30% and 19% of the balances, respectively.

(e) Changes in Estimates on Construction Contracts



The Company’s estimates of contract revenue and cost are highly detailed. The Company believes that, based on its experience, its current systems of managementdetailed and accounting controls allow it to produce materially reliable estimates of total contract revenue and cost during any accounting period. However, many factors can and do change during a contract performance period which canthat result in a change to contract profitability from one financial reporting periodprofitability. These factors include, but are not limited to, another. Some of the factors that can change the estimate of total contract revenue and cost include differing site conditions (to the extent that contract remedies are unavailable), theconditions; availability of skilled contract labor, thelabor; performance of major material suppliers to deliver on time, the performance of major subcontractors,

55


Table of Contents

and subcontractors; on-going subcontractor negotiations and buyout provisions; unusual weather conditions andconditions; changes in the timing of scheduled work; change orders; accuracy of the original bid estimate. Because the Company has many contracts in process at any given time, theseestimate; changes in estimates can offset each other minimizing the impact on overall profitability. However, large changes in cost estimates on larger, more complex construction projects can have a material impact on the Company’s financial statementsestimated labor productivity and are reflected in results of operations when they become known.

Management focuses on evaluating the performance of contracts individually. These estimates and assumptions can vary in the normal course of business as projects progress, when estimated productivity assumptions changecosts based on experience to datedate; achievement of incentive-based income targets; and uncertainties are resolved. Changethe expected, or actual, resolution terms for claims. The factors that cause changes in estimates vary depending on the maturation of the project within its lifecycle. For example, in the ramp-up phase, these factors typically consist of revisions in anticipated project costs and during the peak and close-out phases, these factors include the impact of change orders and claims, as well as changes in related estimates of costs to complete, are consideredadditional revisions in estimates. The Company uses the cumulative catch-up method applicable to construction contract accounting to account for revisions in estimates. In the ordinary course of business, and at a minimum on a quarterly basis, the Company updates projected total contract revenue, cost and profit or loss for each of its contracts based on changes in facts, such as an approved scope change, and changes in estimates. Normal, recurring changes in estimates include, but are not limited to: (i) changes in estimated scope as a result of unapproved or unpriced customer change orders; (ii) changes in estimated productivity assumptions based on experience to date; (iii) changes in estimated materials costs based on experience to date; (iv) changes in estimated subcontractor costs based on subcontractor buyout experience; (v) changes in the timing of scheduled work that may impact future costs; (vi) achievement of incentive income; and (vii) changes in estimated recoveries through the settlement of litigation.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, our results of operations were impacted by $27.9 million because of changes in the estimated recoveries on two Civil segment projects driven by changes in cost recovery assumptions based on certain legal rulings issued during the second quarter of 2014, as well as a final settlement agreement regarding a Building segmentremaining anticipated project reached with our customer during the fourth quarter of 2014, which resulted in a $11.4 million increase in the estimated recovery projected for that project. With respect to the two Civil segment projects, during 2014 there was a $25.9 million favorable increase and a $9.4 million unfavorable decrease. These changes in estimates altogether resulted in an increase of $27.9 million in income from construction operations, $16.0 million in net income, and $0.33 in diluted earnings per common share during 2014.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, our results of operations were impacted by a $13.8 million increase in the estimated recovery projected for a Building segment project due to changes in facts and circumstances that occurred during 2013. This change in estimate resulted in an increase of $13.8 million in income from construction operations, $8.6 million in net income, and $0.18 in diluted earnings per common share during 2013.

Contracts vary in lengths and larger contracts can span over two to six years. At various stages of a contract’s lifecycle, different types of changes in estimates are more typical. Generally during the early ramp up stage, cost estimates relating to purchases of materials and subcontractors are frequently subject to revisions. As a contract moves into the most productive phase of execution, change orders, project cost estimate revisions and claims are frequently the sources for changes in estimates. During the contract’s final phase, remaining estimated costs to complete or provisions for claims will be closed out and adjusted based on actual costs incurred. The impact on operating margin in a reporting period and future periods from a change in estimate will depend on the stage of contract completion.costs. Generally, if the contract is at an early stage of completion, the current period impact is smaller than if the same change in estimate is made to the contract at a later stage of completion. Likewise,Management evaluates changes in estimates on a contract by contract basis and discloses significant changes, if material, in the company’s overall project portfolio wasnotes to be at a later stage of completion during the reporting period, the overall gross margin could be subjectconsolidated financial statements. The cumulative catch-up method is used to greater variability from changesaccount for revisions in estimates.



When recording revenue on contracts relating to unapproved change orders(f) Depreciation of Property and claims, the Company includes in revenue an amount less than or equal to the amountEquipment and Amortization of costs incurred by it to date for contract price adjustments that it seeks to collect from customers for delays, errors in specifications or designs, change orders in dispute or unapproved as to scope or price, or other unanticipated additional costs, in each case when recovery of the costs is considered probable. The amount of unapproved change orders and claim revenues is included in Consolidated Balance Sheets as part of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings. When determining the likelihood of eventual recovery, the Company considers such factors as evaluation of entitlement, settlements reached to date and our experience with the customer. The settlement of these issues may take years depending upon whether the item can be resolved directly with the customer or involves litigation or arbitration. When new facts become known, an adjustment to the estimated recovery is made and reflected in the current period results.Long-Lived Intangible Assets



(e) Method of Accounting for Contracts

RevenuesProperty and profits from the Company’s contractsequipment and construction joint venture contractslong-lived intangible assets are recognized by applying percentages of completion for the period to the total estimated revenues for the respective contracts. Percentage of completion is determined by relating the actual cost of the work performed to date to the current estimated total cost of the respective contracts. However, on contracts under which we provide construction management services, profit is generally recognized in accordance with the contract terms, usually on the as-billed method, which is generally consistent with the level of effort incurred over the contract period. When the estimatedepreciated or amortized on a contract indicates a loss, the Company’s policy is to record the entire loss during the accounting period in which it is estimable. In the ordinary course of business, at a minimum on a quarterlystraight-line basis the Company updates estimates projected total contract revenue, cost and profit or loss for each contract based on changes in facts, such as an approved scope change, and changes in

56


Table of Contents

estimates. The cumulative effect of revisions in estimates of the total forecasted revenue and costs, including unapproved change orders and claims, during the course of the work is reflected in the accounting period in which the facts that caused the revision become known. The financial impact of these revisions to any one contract is a function of both the amount of the revision and the percentage of completion of the contract. Amounts up to the costs incurred which are attributable to unapproved change orders and claims are included in the total estimated revenue when realization is probable. Profit from unapproved change orders and claims is recorded in the period such amounts are resolved.

In accordance with normal practice in the construction industry, the Company includes in current assets and current liabilities amounts related to construction contracts realizable and payable over a period in excess of one year. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings represents the excess of contract billings to date over the amount of contract costs and profits (or contract revenue) recognized to date on the percentage of completion accounting method on certain contracts. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings represents the excess of contract costs and profits (or contract revenue) recognized to date on the percentage of completion accounting method over the amount of contract billings to date on the remaining contracts. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings results when (1) the appropriate contract revenue amount has been recognized in accordance with the percentage of completion accounting method, but a portion of the revenue recorded cannot be billed currently due to the billing terms defined in the contract and/or (2) costs, recorded at estimated realizable value, related to unapproved change orders or claims are incurred.

For unapproved change orders or claims that cannot be resolved in accordance with the normal change order process as defined in the contract, the Company employs other dispute resolution methods, including mediation, binding and non-binding arbitration, or litigation.

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings related to the Company’s contracts and joint venture contracts consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(in thousands)

Unbilled costs and profits incurred to date*

 

$

253,078 

 

$

204,276 

Unapproved change orders

 

 

161,375 

 

 

146,787 

Claims

 

 

311,949 

 

 

222,185 

 

 

$

726,402 

 

$

573,248 

______________

*    Represents the excess of contract costs and profits recognized to date on the percentage of completion accounting method over the amount of contract billings to date on certain contracts.

Of the balance of “Unapproved change orders” and “Claims” included above in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, approximately $38.4 million and $58.8 million, respectively, are amounts subject to pending litigation or dispute resolution proceedings as described in Note 8 — Contingencies and Commitments. These amounts are management’s estimate of the probable cost recovery from the disputed claims considering such factors as evaluation of entitlement, settlements reached to date and experience with the customer. In the event that future facts and circumstances, including the resolution of disputed claims, cause a reduction in the aggregate amount of the estimated probable cost recovery from the disputed claims, the amount of such reduction will be recorded against earnings in the relevant future period.

The prerequisite for billing “Unbilled costs and profits incurred to date” is provided in the defined billing terms of each of the applicable contracts. The prerequisite for billing “Unapproved change orders” or “Claims” is the final resolution and agreement between the parties. The amount of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings at December 31, 2014 estimated by management to be collected beyond one year is approximately $251.3 million.

(f) Property and Equipment

Land, buildings and improvements, construction and computer-related equipment and other equipment are recorded at cost. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized and maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is primarily calculated using the straight-line method for all classifications of depreciable property. Construction equipment is depreciated over estimated useful lives ranging from five to twenty years after an allowance for salvage. The remaining depreciable property is depreciated overtheir estimated useful lives ranging from three to forty years after an allowance for salvage.years.



57


Table(g) Recoverability of Contents

(g) Long-Lived Assets



Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the future cash flows generated by the assets might be less than the assets’ net carrying value. In such circumstances, an impairment loss will be recognized by the amount the assets’ net carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability is evaluated by comparing the carrying value of the assets to the undiscounted associated cash flows. When this comparison indicates that the carrying value of the asset is greater than the undiscounted cash flows, a loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying value and estimatedexceeds their fair value. Fair value is determined based either on market quotes or appropriate valuation techniques.



(h) Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Construction contract backlog is amortized on a weighted- average basis over the corresponding contract period. Customer relationships and certain trade names are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. The Company evaluates intangible assets that are not being amortized at the endRecoverability of each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.Goodwill



The Company tests goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment by applying a fair value testannually for each reporting unit in the fourth quarter of eachthe fiscal year, and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change which suggest that the goodwill or intangible assets should be evaluated. Intangible assets with finite lives are tested for impairment wheneverreevaluated. Such events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The first stepinclude significant changes in the two-step process of the impairment analysis is to determine the fair value of the Companylegal factors and each of its reporting units and compare the fair value of eachbusiness climate, recent losses at a reporting unit, to its carrying value. If the carrying value of theand industry trends, among other factors. The Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors segments each represent a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step must be followed to calculate the goodwill impairment. The second step involves determining the fair value of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit that failed the first step and calculating the implied fair value of goodwill. To determine the fair value of the Company and each of its reporting units, the Company utilizes both an income-based valuation approach as well as a market-based valuation approach. The income-based valuation approach is based on the cash flows that the reporting unit expects to generate in the future and it requires the Company to project revenues, operating expenses, working capital investment, capital spending and cash flows for the reporting unit in a discrete period, as well as determine the weighted-average cost of capital to be used as a discount rate and a terminal value growth rate for the non-discrete period. The market-based valuation approach to estimate the fair value of the Company’s reporting units utilizes industry multiples of revenues and operating earnings.unit. The Company concludes on the fair value of the reporting units by assuming a 67% weighting on the income-based approach and a 33% weighing on the market-based valuation approach.

As part of the valuation process, the aggregate fair value of the Company is compared toperforms its market capitalization at the valuation date in order to determine an implied control premium. In evaluating whether the Company’s implied control premium is reasonable, the Company considers a number of factors including the following factors of greatest significance.

·

Market control premium: The Company compares its implied control premium to the average control premium paid in transactions of companies in the construction industry during the year of evaluation.

·

Sensitivity analysis: The Company performs a sensitivity analysis to determine the minimum control premium required to recover the book value of the Company at the testing date. The minimum control premium required is then compared to the average control premium paid in transactions of companies in the construction industry during the year of evaluation.

·

Impact of low public float and limited trading activity:  A significant portion of the Company’s common stock is owned by the Company’s Chairman and CEO. As a result, the public float of the Company’s common stock, calculated as the percentage of shares of common stock freely traded by public investors divided by the Company’s total shares outstanding, is significantly lower than that of its publicly traded peers. This circumstance does not impact the fair value of the Company, however based on its evaluation of third party market data, the Company believes it does lead to an inherent marketability discount impacting its stock price.

Impairment assessment inherently involves management judgments as to the assumptions used for projections and to evaluate the impact of market conditions on those assumptions. The key assumptions that the Company uses to estimate the fair value of its reporting units under the income-based approach are as follows:

·

Weighted-average cost of capital used to discount the projected cash flows;

·

Cash flows generated from existing and new work awards; and

·

Projected operating margins.

annual

58F-9

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Weighted-average cost of capital rates used to discount the projected cash flows are developed via the capital asset pricing model which is primarily based upon market inputs. The Company uses discount rates that management feels are an accurate reflection of the risks associated with the forecasted cash flows of its respective reporting units.TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

To developquantitative impairment assessment during the cash flows generated from new work awardsfourth quarter of each year using a weighted-average of an income and future operating margins, the Company primarily tracks prospective work for each of its reporting unitsa market approach. The income approach is based on a project-by-project basis as well as the estimated timing of when the work would be bid or prequalified, started and completed. The Company also gives consideration to its relationships with the prospective owners, the pool of competitors that are capable of performing large, complex work, changes in business strategy and the Company’s history of success in winning new work in each reporting unit. With regard to operating margins, the Company gives consideration to its historical reporting unit operating margins in the end markets that the prospective work opportunities are most significant, current market trends in recent new work procurement, and changes in business strategy.

The Company also estimates the fairpresent value of its reporting units under a market-based approach by applying industry-comparable multiples of revenues and operating earnings to its reporting units’ projected performance. The conditions and prospects of companies in the construction industry depend on common factors such as overall demand for services.

Changes in the Company’s assumptions or estimates could materially affect the determination of the fair value of a reporting unit. Such changes in assumptions could be caused by:

·

Terminations, suspensions, reductions in scope or delays in the start-up of the revenues and cash flows from backlog as well as the prospective work the Company tracks;

·

Reductions in available government, state and local agencies and non-residential private industry funding and spending;

·

The Company’s ability to effectively compete for new work and maintain and grow market penetration in the regions that the Company operates in;

·

The Company’s ability to successfully control costs, work schedule, and project delivery; or

·

Broader market conditions, including stock market volatility in the construction industry and its impact on the weighted- average cost of capital assumption.

On a quarterly basis the Company considers whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that assets, including goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization might be impaired. In conjunction with this analysis, the Company evaluates whether its current market capitalization is less than its stockholders’ equity and specifically considers (1) changes in macroeconomic conditions, (2) changes in general economic conditions in the construction industry including any declines in market-dependent multiples, (3) cost factors such as increases in raw materials, labor, or other costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows analyses, (4) a reconciliation of the implied control premium to a current market control premium, (5) target price assessments by third party analysts and (6) the impact of current market conditions on its forecast of future cash flows including considerationfor each reporting unit. The market approach is based on assumptions about how market data relates to the Company. The weighting of specific projectsthese two approaches is based on their individual correlation to the economics of each reporting unit. The quantitative assessment performed in backlog, pending awards, or large prospect opportunities. The Company also evaluates its most recent assessment of the2017 resulted in an estimated fair value for each of itsthe Company’s reporting units considering whether its current forecastthat exceeded their respective net book values; therefore, no impairment charge was necessary for 2017.

(i) Recoverability of future cash flows is in line with those used inNon-Amortizable Trade Names

Certain trade names have an estimated indefinite life and are not amortized to earnings, but instead are reviewed for impairment annually, or more often if events occur or circumstances change which suggest that the non-amortizable trade names should be reevaluated. The Company performs its annual quantitative impairment assessment and whether there are any significant changesduring the fourth quarter of each year using an income approach (relief from royalty method). The quantitative assessment performed in trends or any other material assumptions used.

As of December 31, 2014 the Company has concluded that it does not have2017 resulted in an impairment of its goodwill or its indefinite-lived intangible assets and that the estimated fair value of each reporting unit exceeds its carrying value. See Note 3 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for additional goodwill disclosure.the non-amortizable trade names that exceeded their respective net book values; therefore, no impairment charge was necessary for 2017.



(i)(j) Income Taxes



Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the effects of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the income tax basis of assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to be in effect when such differences reverse. In addition, futureIncome tax benefits, such as non-deductible accrued expenses, are recognized to the extent such benefits are more likely than notpositions must meet a more-likely-than-not threshold to be realized as an economic benefit in the form of a reduction of income taxes in future years.recognized. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of the income tax provision.



(j)(k) Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share



Basic earnings (loss) per common share were computedEPS and diluted EPS are calculated by dividing net income (loss)attributable to Tutor Perini Corporation by the following: for basic EPS, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share were similarly computed after giving consideration tooutstanding during the dilutive effectperiod; and for diluted EPS, the sum of stock options and restricted stock unit awards outstanding on the weighted-average number of both outstanding common shares outstanding.

59


Table of Contents

The computation of diluted earnings (loss) per common share excludes 9,000 stock option shares during 2014, 860,000 stock option shares during 2013, and 1,315,465 stock option shares and 1,291,665potentially dilutive securities, which for the Company can include restricted stock units, during 2012 becauseunexercised stock options and the Convertible Notes, as defined in Note 5. The Company calculates the effect of these shares would have an antidilutive effect.potentially dilutive securities using the treasury stock method.



(k)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands, except per common share data)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Net income attributable to Tutor Perini Corporation

$

148,382 

 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic

 

49,647 

 

 

49,150 

 

 

48,981 

Effect of dilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock

 

1,112 

 

 

714 

 

 

685 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted

 

50,759 

 

 

49,864 

 

 

49,666 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Tutor Perini Corporation per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

2.99 

 

$

1.95 

 

$

0.92 

Diluted

$

2.92 

 

$

1.92 

 

$

0.91 

Anti-dilutive securities not included above

 

798 

 

 

1,132 

 

 

1,372 

With regard to diluted EPS and the impact of the Convertible Notes on the diluted EPS calculation, because the Company has the intent and ability to settle the principal amount of the Convertible Notes in cash, per ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, the settlement of the principal amount has no impact on diluted EPS.

(l) Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash



Cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when acquired.

Cash and cash equivalents, as reported in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, consist of amounts held by the Company that are available for the Company’s general corporate purposes, andas well as the Company’s proportionate share of cash held by the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures and also amounts held by constructionthe Company’s consolidated joint ventures. In both cases, cash held by joint ventures that areis available only for joint venture-related uses, including future distributions to joint venture partners.

F-10


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Cash and cash equivalents

$

94,713 

 

$

49,539 

Joint venture cash and cash equivalents

 

98,155 

 

 

96,564 

Total cash and cash equivalents

$

192,868 

 

$

146,103 



 

 

 

 

 

(m) Restricted Cash and Restricted Investments

The Company has restricted cash isand restricted investments primarily held as collateral to secure insurance-related contingent obligations, such as insurance claim deductibles, in lieu of letters of credit. Restricted investments are comprised of various corporate bonds and bank notes that are rated A3 or better and have maturities within the Company’s operating cycle. These restricted investments are held-to-maturity securities carried at amortized cost.



Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Corporate cash and cash equivalents (available for general  corporate purposes)

 

$

40,846 

 

$

36,579 

 

Company's share of joint venture cash and cash equivalents (available only for joint venture purposes, including future distributions)

 

 

94,737 

 

 

83,344 

 

Total Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

$

135,583 

 

$

119,923 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted Cash

 

$

44,370 

 

$

42,594 

 

(l) Long-term Investments

At December 31, 2013, the Company had $46.3 million invested in Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”) classified as available-for-sale. On April 30, 2014, the Company sold all of its ARS for approximately $44.5 million, limiting the Company’s loss on investment to $1.8 million which properly reflected the Company’s investment policy of maintaining adequate liquidity and maximizing returns.

The Company had classified its ARS investment as long-term investments due to the uncertainty in the timing of future ARS calls and the absence of an active market for government-backed student loans. At the date of the balance sheet prior to the sale, the Company expected that it would take in excess of twelve months before the ARS could be refinanced or sold.

Prior to the sale of the ARS, the Company performed a fair market value assessment of its ARS on a quarterly basis. To estimate fair value, the Company utilized an income approach valuation model, with consideration given to market-based valuation inputs. The model considered, among other items, the following inputs: (i) the underlying structure of each security; (ii) the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates considered to reflect current market conditions (discount rates range from 3% to 7% for investment grade securities); (iii) consideration of the probabilities of default or repurchase at par for each period (term periods range from 6 to 8 years); (iv) prices from recent comparable transactions; and (v) other third party pricing information.

The inputs and the Company’s analysis considered: (i) contractual terms of the ARS instruments; (ii) government- backed guarantees, if any; (iii) credit ratings on the ARS; (iv) current interest rates on the ARS and other market interest rate data; (v) trade data available, including trade data from secondary markets, for the Company’s ARS or similar ARS; (vi) recovery rates for any non-government guaranteed assets; (vii) historical transactions of the Company’s ARS being called at par; (viii) refunding initiatives of ARS; and (ix) risk of downgrade and default. Current market conditions, including repayment status of student loans, credit market risk, market liquidity and macro-economic influences were reflected in these inputs.

On a quarterly basis, the Company also assessed the recoverability of the ARS balance by reviewing: (i) the regularity and timely payment of interest on the securities; (ii) the probabilities of default or repurchase at par; (iii) the risk of loss of principal from government-backed versus non-government-backed securities; and (iv) the prioritization of the Company’s tranche of securities within the investment in case of default. The potential impact of any principal loss was included in the valuation model.

When the Company’s analysis indicated an impairment of a security, several factors were considered to determine the proper classification of the charge including: (i) any requirement or intent to sell the security; (ii) failure of the issuer to pay interest or principal; (iii) volatility of fair value; (iv) changes to the ratings of the security; (v) adverse conditions specific to the security or market; (vi) expected defaults; and (vii) length of time and extent that fair value has been less than the cost basis. The accumulation of

60


Table of Contents

this data was used to conclude if a credit loss existed for the specific security, and then to determine the classification of the impairment charge as temporary or other-than- temporary.

(m) Stock-Based(n) Share-Based Compensation



The Company’s long-term incentive plan allows itplans allow the Company to grant stock-basedshare-based compensation awards in a variety of forms, including restricted and unrestricted stock units and stock options. The terms and conditions of the awards granted are established by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Restricted stock unit awardsunits and stock option awardsoptions generally vest subject to the satisfaction of service and/or performance requirements, or the satisfaction of both service requirements and achievement of certain performance targets. For restricted stock unit awards that vest subject to the satisfaction of service requirements,with related compensation expense is measured based onequal to the fair value of the award on the date of grant and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the requisite service period. Unrestricted stock units vest immediately and are generally issued to the directors as part of their annual retainer fees, in which case they are expensed over a 12-month service period.

For restricted stock unitshare-based awards whichthat have a performance component, compensation cost is measured based onservice requirement, the Company accounts for forfeitures upon occurrence, rather than estimating the probability of forfeiture at the date of grant. Accordingly, the Company recognizes the full grant-date fair value on the grant date (the date performance targets are established) and is recognizedof these awards on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) overthroughout the applicable requisite service period, asreversing any expense if, and only if, there is a forfeiture.

For share-based awards that have a performance-based vesting requirement, the Company evaluates the probability of achieving the performance criterion throughout the performance period, and will adjust share-based compensation expense if it estimates that the achievement of the performance objective becomescriterion, the achievement of which is ultimately determined by the Compensation Committee, is not probable.



(n)(o) Insurance Liabilities



The Company typically utilizes third partythird-party insurance coverage subject to varying deductible levels with aggregate caps on losses retained. The Company assumes the risk for the amount of the deductible portion of the losses and liabilities primarily associated with workers’ compensation and general liability coverage. In addition, on certain projects, the Company assumes the risk for the amount of the deductible portion of losses that arise from any subcontractor defaults. Losses are accrued based upon the Company’s estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using historical experience and certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry. The estimate of insurance liability within the deductible limits includes an estimate of incurred but not reported claims based on data compiled from historical experience.



(o) Fair Value of Financial Instruments(p) Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)



ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components in the consolidated financial statements. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due toCompany reports the short-term nature of these items. The carrying values of receivables, payables and other amounts arising out of normal contract activities, including retentions, which may be settled beyond one year, are estimated to approximate fair values. The fair value of receivables subject to pending litigation or dispute resolution proceedings is determined based upon the length of time that these matters take to be resolved and, as a result, the fair value can be greater than or less than the recorded book value depending on the facts and circumstances of each matter. See Note 2 — Fair Value Measurements for disclosure of thechange in pension benefit plan assets/liabilities, cumulative foreign currency translation, change in fair value of investments long-term debt and contingent consideration associated with our acquisitionschange in 2011.

(p) Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency for the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is the local currency. Accordingly, the assets and liabilitiesfair value of those operations are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates at the balance sheet date and operating statement items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The resulting cumulative translation adjustment is recorded in the foreign currency translation adjustment accountan interest rate swap as partcomponents of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses, if any, are included in operations as they occur.

(q) New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04 Liabilities (Topic 405), which provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date. This ASU is an update to FASB ASC Topic 405, “Liabilities”. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). This ASU addresses when unrecognized tax benefits should be presented as reductions to deferred tax assets for net operating loss carryforwards in the financial statements. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.(“AOCI”).



61F-11

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The tax effects of the components of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

(in thousands)

Before-Tax Amount

 

Tax (Expense) Benefit

 

Net-of-Tax Amount

 

Before-Tax Amount

 

Tax Benefit

 

Net-of-Tax Amount

 

Before-Tax Amount

 

Tax Benefit (Expense)

 

Net-of-Tax Amount

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension plan adjustments

$

2,416 

 

$

(992)

 

$

1,424 

 

$

(4,452)

 

$

1,829 

 

$

(2,623)

 

$

31 

 

$

1,995 

 

$

2,026 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

2,159 

 

 

(886)

 

 

1,273 

 

 

(439)

 

 

178 

 

 

(261)

 

 

(5,897)

 

 

2,683 

 

 

(3,214)

Unrealized (loss) gain in fair value of investments

 

(4)

 

 

 

 

(2)

 

 

(576)

 

 

236 

 

 

(340)

 

 

1,123 

 

 

(357)

 

 

766 

Unrealized loss in fair value of interest rate swap

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(45)

 

 

21 

 

 

(24)

 

 

(37)

 

 

(88)

 

 

(125)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

$

4,571 

 

$

(1,876)

 

$

2,695 

 

$

(5,512)

 

$

2,264 

 

$

(3,248)

 

$

(4,780)

 

$

4,233 

 

$

(547)

Total other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Tutor Perini Corporation

$

4,571 

 

$

(1,876)

 

$

2,695 

 

$

(5,512)

 

$

2,264 

 

$

(3,248)

 

$

(4,780)

 

$

4,233 

 

$

(547)

The changes in AOCI balances by component (after tax) for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017 are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

Unrealized (Loss) Gain in Fair Value of Investments

 

Unrealized Gain (Loss) in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Attributable to Tutor Perini Corporation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014

$

(40,268)

 

$

(1,389)

 

$

(110)

 

$

149 

 

$

(41,618)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

2,026 

 

 

(3,214)

 

 

766 

 

 

(125)

 

 

(547)

Balance as of December 31, 2015

$

(38,242)

 

$

(4,603)

 

$

656 

 

$

24 

 

$

(42,165)

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

 

(3,722)

 

 

(261)

 

 

(340)

 

 

(24)

 

 

(4,347)

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

1,099 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,099 

Balance as of December 31, 2016

$

(40,865)

 

$

(4,864)

 

$

316 

 

$

 —

 

$

(45,413)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

306 

 

 

1,273 

 

 

(2)

 

 

 —

 

 

1,577 

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

1,118 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,118 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

$

(39,441)

 

$

(3,591)

 

$

314 

 

$

 —

 

$

(42,718)

The significant items reclassified out of AOCI and the corresponding location and impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Location in Consolidated

 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

Statements of Income

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Defined benefit pension plan adjustments

Various accounts(a)

 

$

1,897 

 

$

1,745 

 

$

 —

Income tax benefit

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

 

(779)

 

 

(646)

 

 

 —

Net of tax

 

 

$

1,118 

 

$

1,099 

 

$

 —

(a)Defined benefit pension plan adjustments were reclassified to cost of operations and general and administrative expenses.

(q) New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued FASB ASU No.Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedesas amended by subsequent ASUs (collectively, “ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU addresses when an entity should recognizeand establishes principles for recognizing revenue to depictupon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflectsbased on the expected consideration to which the entity expects to be entitledreceived in exchange for those goods or services. This ASUThe guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application (modified retrospective method). The Company will adopt this new standard using the modified retrospective method. The Company has reviewed its contract portfolio in order to determine the impact that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements. Based on the Company’s evaluation of ASU 2014-09, the Company expects an immaterial reduction to beginning retained earnings, with an immaterial impact to net income on an ongoing basis. The Company has implemented changes to its business processes, systems and internal controls to support the adoption of this new standard and the related disclosure requirements. The adoption of the standard is also expected to impact the presentation of the consolidated balance sheet. The impact primarily relates to reclassifications among project working capital financial statement accounts to align with the new standard.

F-12


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In February 2016, includingthe FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which amends the existing guidance in ASC 840, Leases. This amendment requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases currently classified as operating leases. Other significant provisions of the amendment include (i) defining the “lease term” to include the non-cancellable period together with periods for which there is a significant economic incentive for the lessee to extend or not terminate the lease; (ii) defining the initial lease liability to be recorded on the balance sheet to contemplate only those variable lease payments that depend on an index or that are in substance “fixed”; and (iii) a dual approach for determining whether lease expense is recognized on a straight-line or accelerated basis, depending on whether the lessee is expected to consume more than an insignificant portion of the leased asset’s economic benefits. This guidance will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods within that reporting period,beginning after December 15, 2018 and will be applied using one of twothe modified retrospective application methods. Early application is not permitted.transition method for existing leases. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.



In June 2014,March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation — Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718):Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for Share-Based Payments Whenshare-based payment transactions, including the Termsaccounting for the income tax effect of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved aftershare-based transactions and the Requisite Service Period, clarifyingforfeiture of share-based instruments. The Company prospectively adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2017. Upon this adoption, the recognition timing of expense associated with certain performance based stockCompany changed its accounting policy for share-based awards whenthat have service requirements such that the performance target that affects vesting couldimpact for failure to meet service requirements will only be achieved after the requisite service period. This ASU is an update to FASB ASC Topic 718 and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015 with earlier adoption permitted.  recognized upon occurrence. The adoption of this guidance isASU did not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.



In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), seeking to eliminate diversity in practice related to how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 address eight specific cash flow issues including the classification of debt prepayment and extinguishment costs in the cash flow statement. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period provided any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. The Company adopted this accounting standard in 2017 and has applied the provisions retrospectively to the beginning of the fiscal years presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.



[2] Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures certain financial instruments, includingIn November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which requires restricted cash to be included with cash and cash equivalents, such as money market funds, at their fair values. The fair values were determined based on a three-tier valuation hierarchy for disclosure of significant inputs. These hierarchical tiers are defined as follows:

Level 1 — inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable through market corroboration.

Level 3 — inputs are unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions based on the best information availableequivalent balances in the circumstances.statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this ASU will result in an increase of net cash used in investing activities of $45.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and a decrease of net cash used in investing activities of $4.7 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.



The carrying amountIn January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). This ASU simplifies the calculation of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value duegoodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2 of the impairment test prescribed by ASC 350. Step 2 requires companies to calculate the short-term nature of these items. The carrying values of receivables, payables, other amounts arising out of normal contract activities, including retainage, which may be settled beyond one year, are estimated to approximate fair value. Theimplied fair value of receivables subject to pending litigation or dispute resolution proceedings is determined based upon the length of time that these matters take to be resolved and, as a result,their goodwill by estimating the fair value canof their assets, other than goodwill, and liabilities, including unrecognized assets and liabilities, following the procedure that would be greater than or less than the recorded book value depending on the facts and circumstances of each matter. Of the Company’s long-term debt,required in determining the fair valuesvalue of the fixed rate senior unsecured notes as of December 31, 2014assets acquired and 2013 were $310.3 million and $321.0 million, respectively, compared to the carrying values of $298.8 million and $298.5 million, respectively.liabilities assumed in a business combination. The calculated net fair value of the senior unsecured notes was estimated using Level 1 inputs based on market quotations including broker quotes or interest rates for the same or similar financial instruments at December 31, 2014 and 2013. For other fixed rate debt, fair value is determined using Level 3 inputs based on discounted cash flows for the debt at the Company’s current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of debt. The estimated fair values of other fixed rate debt at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $164.3 million and $150.0 million, respectively,assets would then be compared to the carrying amounts of $162.3 million and $151.4 million, respectively. The fair value of variable rate debt, which includes the Term Loan, approximatedreporting unit to determine the implied fair value of goodwill, and to the extent that the carrying value of goodwill was less than the implied fair value, a loss would be recognized. Under ASU 2017-04, however, goodwill is impaired when the calculated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, and the impairment charge will equal that difference (i.e., impairment will be calculated at the reporting unit level and there will be no need to estimate the fair value of $404.3 millionindividual assets and $283.9 million atliabilities). This guidance will be effective for any goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. See Note 4 —15, 2019; however, early adoption is permitted for tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Financial Commitments Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accountingfor. This ASU clarifies the scope of modification accounting under Topic 718 with respect to changes to the terms or conditions of a discussionshare-based payments award. Under this new guidance, modification accounting would not apply if a change to an award does not affect the total current fair value, vesting conditions or the classification of the Term Loan.award. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU gives entities the option to

62F-13

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

reclassify to retained earnings tax effects related to items in accumulated other comprehensive income that the FASB refers to as having been stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of tax reform. Entities can apply the provisions of this ASU either in the period of adoption or retrospectively. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

The following is a summary

2.     Consolidated Statement of financial statement items carried at estimated fair value measured on a recurring basisCash Flows

Below are the changes in other components of working capital, as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and the dates presented:supplemental disclosure of cash paid for interest and income taxes:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted prices

 

 

other

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

Total

 

 

in active

 

 

observable

 

 

unobservable

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

markets

 

 

inputs

 

 

inputs

At December 31, 2014

 

 

Value

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

 

(in thousands)

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Cash and cash equivalents (1)

 

$

135,583 

 

$

135,583 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 Restricted cash (1)

 

 

44,370 

 

 

44,370 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 Short-term investments (2)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 Investments in lieu of retainage (3)

 

 

33,224 

 

 

25,761 

 

 

7,463 

 

 

 —

Total

 

$

213,177 

 

$

205,714 

 

$

7,463 

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Interest rate swap contract (5)

 

$

381 

 

$

 —

 

$

381 

 

$

 —

 Contingent consideration (6)

 

 

24,814 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

24,814 

 

 

$

25,195 

 

$

 —

 

$

381 

 

$

24,814 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted prices

 

 

other

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

Total

 

 

in active

 

 

observable

 

 

unobservable

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

markets

 

 

inputs

 

 

inputs

At December 31, 2013

 

 

Value

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

 

(in thousands)

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Cash and cash equivalents (1)

 

$

119,923 

 

$

119,923 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 Restricted cash (1)

 

 

42,594 

 

 

42,594 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 Short-term investments (2)

 

 

2,336 

 

 

 —

 

 

2,336 

 

 

 —

 Investments in lieu of retainage (3)

 

 

21,913 

 

 

12,184 

 

 

9,729 

 

 

 —

Long-term investments - auction rate securities (4)

 

 

46,283 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

46,283 

Total

 

$

233,049 

 

$

174,701 

 

$

12,065 

 

$

46,283 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Interest rate swap contract (5)

 

$

974 

 

$

 —

 

$

974 

 

$

 —

 Contingent consideration (6)

 

 

46,022 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

46,022 

 

 

$

46,996 

 

$

 —

 

$

974 

 

$

46,022 

______________

(1)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash primarily consist of money market funds with original maturity dates of three months or less, for which fair value is determined through quoted market prices.

(2)

Short-term investments are classified as other current assets and are comprised of U.S. Treasury Notes and municipal bonds. The majority of the municipal bonds are rated Aa2 or better. The fair values of the municipal bonds are obtained from readily- available pricing sources for comparable instruments, and as such, the Company has classified these assets as Level 2.

(3)

Investments in lieu of retainage are classified as accounts receivable, including retainage and are comprised of money market funds, U.S. Treasury Notes and other municipal bonds, the majority of which are rated Aa3 or better. The fair values of the U.S. Treasury Notes and municipal bonds are obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments, and as such, the Company has classified these assets as Level 2.

(4)

At 2013 the Company had $46.3 million invested in ARS which the Company considered as available-for-sale long-term investments. The long-term investments ARS held by the Company at 2013 were in securities collateralized by student loan portfolios. At 2013, most of the Company’s ARS were rated AA+ and AA+, respectively. The Company estimated the fair value

63


Table of Contents

of its ARS utilizing an income approach valuation model which considered, among other items, the following inputs: (i) the underlying structure of each security; (ii) the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates considered to reflect current market conditions (discount rates range from 3% to 7%); (iii) consideration of the probabilities of default or repurchase at par for each period (term periods range from 6 to 8 years); (iv) prices from recent comparable transactions; and (v) other third party pricing information without adjustment.

(5)

As discussed in Note 4 — Financial Commitments, the Company entered into a swap agreement with Bank of America, N.A. to establish a long-term interest rate for its $200 million five-year term loan which extends to its replacement $250 million five-year term loan. The swap agreement became effective for the term loan principal balance outstanding at January 31, 2012 and will remain effective through June, 2016. The Company values the interest rate swap liability utilizing a discounted cash flow model that takes into consideration forward interest rates observable in the market and the counterparty’s credit risk. This liability is classified as a component of other long-term liabilities.

(6)

The liabilities listed as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 above represent the contingent consideration for the Company’s acquisitions in 2011 for which the measurement periods for purchase price analyses for the acquisitions have concluded.

The Company did not have any transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of financial assets or liabilities that are fair valued on a recurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The following is a summary of changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis during 2014 and 2013:

Auction Rate

Securities

(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2013

$

46,283 

Purchases

 —

Settlements

(44,497)

Realized loss included in other income (expense), net

(1,786)

Balance at December 31, 2014

$

 —

Auction Rate

Securities

(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2012

$

46,283 

Purchases

 —

Settlements

 —

Balance at December 31, 2013

$

46,283 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

(Increase) Decrease in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

$

(57,609)

 

$

(269,900)

 

$

4,734 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

(100,932)

 

 

73,349 

 

 

(178,774)

Other current assets

 

(19,718)

 

 

39,480 

 

 

(38,616)

(Decrease) Increase in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

(32,225)

 

 

56,552 

 

 

139,290 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

125,757 

 

 

42,926 

 

 

(30,985)

Accrued expenses

 

24,513 

 

 

(32,937)

 

 

(24,426)

Changes in other components of working capital

$

(60,214)

 

$

(90,530)

 

$

(128,777)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the year for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

$

50,443 

 

$

47,403 

 

$

45,055 

Income taxes

$

39,776 

 

$

26,908 

 

$

35,299 







At December 31, 2013, the Company had $46.3 million invested in ARS classified

3.     Income Taxes

Income before taxes is summarized as available-for-sale. All of the ARS were securities collateralized by student loan portfolios guaranteed by the United States government. At December 31, 2013, most of the Company’s ARS were rated AA+. On April 30, 2014, the Company sold all of its ARS for approximately $44.5 million, limiting our loss on investment to $1.8 million which properly reflected the Company’s investment policy of maintaining adequate liquidity and maximizing returns.follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

United States operations

 

$

135,177 

 

$

128,072 

 

$

69,822 

Foreign operations

 

 

18,798 

 

 

21,043 

 

 

4,017 

Total

 

$

153,975 

 

$

149,115 

 

$

73,839 



The Company had classified its ARS investmentincome tax (benefit) provision is as long-term investments due to the uncertainty in the timing of future ARS calls and the absence of an active market for government-backed student loans. At the date of the balance sheet prior to the sale, the Company expected that it would take in excess of twelve months before the ARS could be refinanced or sold.follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Current expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

12,329 

 

$

43,850 

 

$

5,465 

State

 

 

6,763 

 

 

13,039 

 

 

(362)

Foreign

 

 

3,435 

 

 

6,573 

 

 

1,126 

Total current

 

 

22,527 

 

 

63,462 

 

 

6,229 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred (benefit) expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

(30,021)

 

 

(3,054)

 

 

19,583 

State

 

 

5,560 

 

 

(5,302)

 

 

2,735 

Foreign

 

 

1,365 

 

 

(1,813)

 

 

 —

Total deferred

 

 

(23,096)

 

 

(10,169)

 

 

22,318 

Total (benefit) provision

 

$

(569)

 

$

53,293 

 

$

28,547 

64F-14

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following table is a summaryreconciliation of changes in Level 3 liabilities measuredthe Company’s income tax provision at fair value on a recurring basis during 2014 and 2013:

the statutory rates to the income tax (benefit) provision at the Company’s effective rate:



Contingent

Consideration

(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2013

$

46,022 

Fair value adjustments included in other income (expense), net

5,592 

Contingent consideration settled

(26,800)

Balance at December 31, 2014

$

24,814 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Year Ended December 31,



 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

(dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

Federal income tax expense at statutory tax rate

 

$

53,892 

 

35.0 

%

 

$

52,190 

 

35.0 

%

 

$

25,844 

 

35.0 

%

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

 

 

7,753 

 

5.0 

 

 

 

4,614 

 

3.1 

 

 

 

3,685 

 

5.0 

 

Impact of federal tax law change

 

 

(53,348)

 

(34.6)

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

Officers' compensation

 

 

2,622 

 

1.7 

 

 

 

3,807 

 

2.6 

 

 

 

2,900 

 

3.9 

 

Domestic production activities deduction

 

 

(2,668)

 

(1.7)

 

 

 

(4,018)

 

(2.7)

 

 

 

(1,499)

 

(2.0)

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

(2,137)

 

(1.4)

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

Reversal of taxes payable due to statute expiration

 

 

(4,337)

 

(2.8)

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

Other

 

 

(2,346)

 

(1.6)

 

 

 

(3,300)

 

(2.3)

 

 

 

(2,383)

 

(3.2)

 

Income tax (benefit) provision

 

$

(569)

 

(0.4)

%

 

$

53,293 

 

35.7 

%

 

$

28,547 

 

38.7 

%





On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted significant tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”). The TCJA makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code that will impact the Company’s financial statements, including but not limited to a permanent decrease in the corporate federal statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018, and a one-time transition tax from the inclusion of foreign earnings, which the Company can elect to pay over eight years. Future distributions from foreign subsidiaries, however, will no longer be subject to federal income tax.



As a result of the TCJA, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $53.3 million in 2017, primarily due to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the reduced corporate federal statutory income tax rate of 21%.

Contingent

Consideration

(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2012

$

42,624 

Fair value adjustments included in other income (expense), net

26,374 

Contingent consideration settled

(22,976)

Balance at December 31, 2013

$

46,022 



The liabilities listed above representSecurities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for the contingent considerationtax effects of the TCJA. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the TCJA enactment date for former acquisitionscompanies to complete the accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the TCJA for which the measurement periodsaccounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that a company’s accounting for purchase price analyses for allcertain income tax effects of the acquisitions have concluded.TCJA is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the TCJA.



The fair values of the contingent consideration were estimated based on an income approach whichone-time transition tax is based on the Company’s total post-1986 earnings and profits (“E&P”) that it previously deferred from U.S. income taxes. The Company recorded a provisional amount for its one-time transition tax liability for its foreign subsidiaries, resulting in an increase in income tax expense of $0.5 million. The Company has not yet completed its calculation of the total post-1986 E&P for these foreign subsidiaries. Further, the transition tax is based in part on the amount of those earnings held in cash flows thatand other specified assets. This amount may change when the acquired entity is expected to generateCompany finalizes the calculation of post-1986 foreign E&P previously deferred from U.S. federal taxation and finalizes the amounts held in the future. This approach requires management to project revenues, operating expenses, working capital investment, capital spending and cash flows for the reporting unit over a multi-year period, as well as determine the weighted-average cost of capital to be used as a discount rate (weighted-average cost of capital inputs have ranged from 14% - 18%).or other specified assets.



[3] Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the Company’s reporting units for the periods presented:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty

 

Management

 

 

 

 

 

Civil

 

Building

 

Contractors

 

Services

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Gross Goodwill Balance

 

 

429,893 

 

 

420,267 

 

 

141,833 

 

 

66,638 

 

 

1,058,631 

Accumulated Impairment

 

 

(55,740)

 

 

(409,765)

 

 

 —

 

 

(22,480)

 

 

(487,985)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

374,153 

 

 

10,502 

 

$

141,833 

 

$

44,158 

 

$

570,646 

Goodwill recorded in connection with an acquisition (2)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,110 

 

 

 —

 

 

7,110 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

374,153 

 

$

10,502 

 

$

148,943 

 

$

44,158 

 

$

577,756 

Reallocation based on relative fair value (1)

 

 

41,205 

 

 

2,953 

 

 

 —

 

 

(44,158)

 

 

 —

Acquisition related adjustments (2)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,250 

 

 

 —

 

 

7,250 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

415,358 

 

$

13,455 

 

$

156,193 

 

$

 —

 

$

585,006 

______________

(1)

During the first quarter of 2014, the Company completed a reorganization which resulted in the elimination of the Management Services reporting unit and reportable segment. The Management Services reporting unit formerly consisted of the following subsidiary companies: Black Construction and Perini Management Services. The reorganization was completed due to the unit no longer meeting the criteria set forth in FASB ASC Topic 280,  “Segment Reporting”.  The Company reallocated goodwill between its reorganized reporting units based on a relative fair value assessment in accordance with the guidance on segment reporting.

65F-15

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following is a summary of the significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timing of expense recognition

 

$

22,730 

 

$

36,055 

Net operating losses

 

 

8,590 

 

 

10,140 

Other, net

 

 

15,618 

 

 

33,507 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

46,938 

 

 

79,702 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(381)

 

 

(460)

Net deferred tax assets

 

 

46,557 

 

 

79,242 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets, due primarily to purchase accounting

 

 

(30,019)

 

 

(34,679)

Fixed assets, due primarily to purchase accounting

 

 

(73,833)

 

 

(107,081)

Construction contract accounting

 

 

(17,539)

 

 

(12,564)

Joint ventures

 

 

(11,343)

 

 

(29,609)

Other

 

 

(22,263)

 

 

(24,970)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(154,997)

 

 

(208,903)



 

 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

$

(108,440)

 

$

(129,661)

(2)

During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company acquired a small fire protection systems contractor.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, an adjustment was made to goodwill for this acquisition in the amount of $7.3 million. As this acquisition is immaterial, including adjustments, no pro forma disclosures are presented herein.



The Company tests goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment by applying a fair value testnet deferred tax liabilities are presented in the fourth quarter of each year and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that suggest a material adverse changeConsolidated Balance Sheets as  follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

Deferred tax assets

 

$

64 

 

$

1,346 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(108,504)

 

 

(131,007)

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

$

(108,440)

 

$

(129,661)

Prior to 2017, the most recently concluded valuation. Intangible assets with finite lives are also tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company did not observe any changesprovide for deferred income taxes or foreign withholding tax on basis differences in facts or circumstances duringits non-U.S. subsidiaries that result from undistributed earnings which the twelve months endedCompany had the intent and the ability to reinvest in its foreign operations. Due to the enactment of the TCJA, the Company no longer intends to permanently reinvest in its foreign subsidiaries. Any tax on future distributions will be limited to certain state taxes, which would be immaterial.

The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as an element of income tax expense. The cumulative amounts related to interest and penalties are added to the total unrecognized tax liabilities on the balance sheet. The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 20142017 that, if recognized, would suggestaffect the effective tax rate is $6.5 million. During 2017, the Company recognized a material declinenet decrease of $1.1 million in the valueliabilities. The amount of goodwill and intangible assetsgross unrecognized tax benefits as concluded in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2013.2016 was $7.6 million. During 2016, the Company recognized a net increase of $4.0 million in liabilities. The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2015 was $3.6 million. During 2015, the Company recognized a net decrease of $4.0 million in liabilities. The Company does not expect any significant release of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.



The net changeCompany accounts for its uncertain tax positions in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of the carrying amountbeginning and ending amounts of goodwillthese tax benefits for the yearthree years ended December 31, 2012 was due primarily to a goodwill impairment charge of $321.1 million recorded in the second quarter of 2012. See “2017Goodwill Impairment” below. is as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Beginning balance

 

$

7,574 

 

$

3,612 

 

$

7,636 

Change in tax positions of prior years

 

 

(1,207)

 

 

3,543 

 

 

(3,073)

Change in tax positions of current year

 

 

128 

 

 

419 

 

 

169 

Reduction in tax positions for statute expirations

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,120)

Ending Balance

 

$

6,495 

 

$

7,574 

 

$

3,612 

Goodwill Impairment



The Company performsconducts business internationally and, as a result, one or more of its annual impairment test of goodwillsubsidiaries files income tax returns in U.S. federal, U.S. state and other indefinite-lived intangible assetscertain foreign jurisdictions. Accordingly, in the fourth quarternormal course of each year. The first step in the two step process is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step must be followed to calculate the goodwill impairment. The second step involves determining the fair value of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit and calculating the implied fair value of goodwill. To determine the fair value of its reporting units,business, the Company usesis subject to examination by taxing authorities principally throughout the income approach, which is based on the cash flows that the reporting unit expects to generate in the future. This income valuation method requires management to project revenues, operating expenses, working capital investment, capital spendingUnited States, Guam and cash flows for the reporting unit over a multi-year period, as well as determine the weighted-average cost of capital to be used as a discount rate.Canada. The Company also usesis no longer under examination by the market valuation method to estimate the fair value of its reporting units by utilizing industry multiples of operating earnings. Impairment assessment inherently involves management judgments as to assumptions used to project these amounts and the impact of market conditions on those assumptions.

As part of the valuation process, the aggregate fair value of the Company was compared to its market capitalization at the valuation date in order to determine the implied control premium. The implied control premium was then compared to the control premiums paid in recent transactions within the industry. The Company’s implied market control premium of 29.3% and 35.6%, as of the fourth quarter of 2014 and fourth quarter of 2013 valuation, respectively, were determined to be in an acceptable range of market transactions observed in the construction and engineering industry in the past several years.

As part of the review process for the reporting unit valuations, the Company created multiple income-based and market-based valuation models to understand the sensitivity of the variables used in determining the fair value. These models were reviewed with the Company’s external fair value specialists who assisted in the process by providing insight into acceptable ranges on various valuation assumptions as well as preferred valuation techniques.

Weighted-average cost of capital rates used to discount the projected cash flows were developed via the capital asset pricing model which is primarily based upon market inputs. The Company used discount rates that management felt were an accurate reflection of the risks associated with the forecasted cash flows of its respective reporting units. Weighted- average cost of capital inputs ranged from 14.0%-  15.5% for the Company’s reporting units. Since the Company’s 2012 annual impairment analysis, the weighted-average cost of capital rates were positively impacted by broader market conditions including the recent rise in comparable companies within the construction industry.

Similar to previous valuations, the Company noted that small changes to valuation assumptions could have a significant impact on the concluded value; however, the Company gained comfort over the assumptions selected for valuation through comparison to historical transaction benchmarks, third party industry expectations, and the Company’s previous models.

During the second quarter of 2012, the Company experienced a sustained decrease in its stock price, causing its market capitalization to be substantially less than its carrying value and its implied control premium to increase beyond the implied control premium that was reconciled in its 2011 annual impairment analysis, and beyond the observable market comparable level. Additionally, deterioration in broader market conditions including stock market volatility, particularly in the construction industry, impacted the weighted-average cost of capital rate assumptions used in deriving the fair values of the Company’s reporting units, which are primarily based on market inputs. Finally, several of the Company’s reporting units experienced degradation in the timing of projected cash flows used in deriving the fair values of those reporting units in its 2011 annual impairment analysis caused by delays in the timing of awards and start of new work that the Company anticipated would enter into backlog in the first half of 2012, and a general decrease in profit margins on new work awards that were factored into the Company’s forecast assumptions.

66F-16

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

With regardtaxing authority regarding any U.S. federal income tax returns for years before 2011 while the years open for examination under various state and local jurisdictions vary.

4.     Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company had $585.0 million of goodwill allocated to the Company’sits reporting units the carrying values of the Company’sas follows: Civil, and$415.3 million; Building, reporting units were greater than their fair values,$13.5 million; and as such, the Company performed the second step of the goodwill impairment test for these reporting units which resulted in goodwill impairments as discussed above. In this second step, the Company determined the fair value of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting units that failed Step 1 and calculated the implied fair value of goodwill for those reporting units. The Company included in this calculation the valuation of assets and liabilities that would occur in a theoretical purchase price allocation of the reporting unit in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805 — Business Combinations, as well as the value of backlog, trade name, and customer relationships and the impact of deferred tax liabilities and assets arising from the fair valuation of these assets and liabilities.

The fair value of the Specialty Contractors, reporting unit substantially exceeded its carrying value,$156.2 million. The balances presented include historical accumulated impairment of $76.7 million for the Civil segment and as such, it was not necessary to perform$411.3 million for the second step of the goodwill impairment test for this reporting unit.Building segment.



In conducting the initial stepaddition, as of its goodwill evaluation,December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company also evaluated its finite lived tangible and intangible assets due tohad the degradation in the timing of projected cash flows since the Company’s 2011 impairment analysis and changes in the planned use of certain intangible assets. The Company compared the fair value of the finite lived tangible and intangible assets to their carrying value and determined that thefollowing: (1) non-amortizable trade names with a carrying value of $50.4 million; (2) amortizable trade names with a portiongross carrying value of these assets exceeded their fair value as determined by the income-based valuation approach$51.1 million and by benchmarking against observable market prices. This income-based valuation approach involved key assumptions similar to those used in the goodwill impairment analysis for the Company’s reporting units as discussed above, (e.g. projections of future cash flows associated with the Company’s trade name, contractor license, customer relationship and contract backlog intangible assets that were recorded in previous acquisitions).

Based on these circumstances and events, the Company performed an interim goodwill and indefinite lived intangible asset impairment testaccumulated amortization as of June 30, 2012December 31, 2017 and as a result, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge2016 of $321.1$16.3 million and an indefinite lived intangible assets impairment charge$13.8 million, respectively; and (3) amortizable customer relationships with a gross carrying value of $16.4$23.2 million in the second quarterand accumulated amortization as of 2012. The Company also evaluated its finite lived tangibleDecember 31, 2017 and intangible assets due to the degradation in the timing2016 of projected cash flows since the Company’s 2011 impairment analysis$18.9 million and changes in the planned use of certain intangible assets, and this analysis resulted in a $39.1$17.9 million, impairment charge on the Company’s finite lived intangible assets in the second quarter of 2012.

Intangible assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Impairment

 

Carrying

 

Amortization

 

 

Cost

 

Amortization

 

Charge

 

Value

 

Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade names (non-amortizable)

 

$

117,600 

 

$

 —

 

$

(67,190)

 

$

50,410 

 

Indefinite

Trade names (amortizable)

 

 

74,350 

 

 

(8,829)

 

 

(23,232)

 

 

42,289 

 

20 years

Contractor license

 

 

6,000 

 

 

 —

 

 

(6,000)

 

 

 —

 

Indefinite

Customer relationships

 

 

39,800 

 

 

(15,600)

 

 

(16,645)

 

 

7,555 

 

11.4 years

Construction contract backlog

 

 

73,706 

 

 

(73,706)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

3.6 years

Total

 

$

311,456 

 

$

(98,135)

 

$

(113,067)

 

$

100,254 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Impairment

 

Carrying

 

Amortization

 

 

 

Cost

 

Amortization

 

Charge

 

Value

 

Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade names (non-amortizable)

 

$

117,600 

 

$

 —

 

$

(67,190)

 

$

50,410 

 

Indefinite

Trade names (amortizable)

 

 

74,350 

 

 

(6,341)

 

 

(23,232)

 

 

44,777 

 

20 years

Contractor license

 

 

6,000 

 

 

 —

 

 

(6,000)

 

 

 —

 

Indefinite

Customer relationships

 

 

39,800 

 

 

(14,315)

 

 

(16,645)

 

 

8,840 

 

11.4 years

Construction contract backlog

 

 

73,706 

 

 

(63,993)

 

 

 —

 

 

9,713 

 

3.6 years

Total

 

$

311,456 

 

$

(84,649)

 

$

(113,067)

 

$

113,740 

 

 

 

respectively.



Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2014,  2013,2017, 2016 and 20122015 totaled $13.5$3.5 million, $13.1$3.5 million and $18.3$3.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2014,Future amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets will be approximately $3.5 million per year for the years 2018 through 2021 and $2.6 million for the year 2022.

The weighted-average amortization period for amortizable trade names and customer relationships is estimated20 years and 12 years, respectively.

5.     Financial Commitments

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following as of the dates of the Consolidated Balance Sheets presented:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

2017 Senior Notes

$

492,734 

 

$

 —

2017 Credit Facility

 

 —

 

 

 —

2010 Senior Notes

 

 —

 

 

298,120 

2014 Revolver

 

 —

 

 

147,990 

Term Loan

 

 —

 

 

54,650 

Convertible Notes

 

161,635 

 

 

152,668 

Equipment financing and mortgages

 

76,820 

 

 

101,558 

Other indebtedness

 

5,087 

 

 

4,533 

Total debt

 

736,276 

 

 

759,519 

Less: Current maturities

 

(30,748)

 

 

(85,890)

Long-term debt, net

$

705,528 

 

$

673,629 

The following table reconciles the outstanding debt balance to bethe reported debt balances as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31, 2017

 

As of December 31, 2016

(in thousands)

Outstanding Long-Term Debt

 

Unamortized Discount and Issuance Costs

 

Long-Term

Debt,

as reported

 

Outstanding Long-Term Debt

 

Unamortized Discounts and Issuance Costs

 

Long-Term Debt,
as reported

2017 Senior Notes

$

500,000 

 

$

(7,266)

 

$

492,734 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

2010 Senior Notes

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

300,000 

 

 

(1,880)

 

 

298,120 

2014 Revolver

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

152,500 

 

 

(4,510)

 

 

147,990 

Term Loan

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

57,000 

 

 

(2,350)

 

 

54,650 

Convertible Notes

 

200,000 

 

 

(38,365)

 

 

161,635 

 

 

200,000 

 

 

(47,332)

 

 

152,668 

The unamortized issuance cost related to the 2017 Credit Facility was $6.2 million as of December 31, 2017 and is included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

67F-17

 


 

Table of Contents

 

$3.7 million in 2015, $3.5 million in 2016,  $3.5 million in 2017,  $3.5 million in 2018,  $3.6 million in 2019 and $32.0 million thereafter.TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

[4] Financial Commitments

Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Senior unsecured notes due November 1, 2018 with interest rate of 7.625% payable in equal semi-annual installments beginning May 1, 2011 through November 1, 2018

 

$

300,000 

 

$

300,000 

Less unamortized debt discount based on imputed interest rate of 7.75%

 

 

(1,223)

 

 

(1,493)

Total amount, net of unamortized discount

 

 

298,777 

 

 

298,507 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$300.0 million revolving line of credit at lender's prime rate (3.25%) or Euro rate, plus applicable spread rates, maturing in 2019

 

 

130,000 

 

 

135,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$250.0 million term loan in 2014 and a $200.0 million term loan in 2013 including quarterly installments of principal and interest payable over a five-year period at rates as defined in the Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Facility, the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement, and the Swap Agreement

 

 

242,500 

 

 

115,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment financing at rates ranging from 2.12% to 4.82% payable in equal monthly installments over a five-year period, with balloon payments totaling $8.3 million in 2016

 

 

102,009 

 

 

78,055 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan on transportation equipment with interest rate of 6.44% payable in equal monthly installments over a five-year period, with a balloon payment of $29.2 million in 2014

 

 

 —

 

 

29,582 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan on transportation equipment with interest rate of 3.35% payable in equal monthly installments over a ten-year period, with a balloon payment of $12.4 million in 2021

 

 

27,954 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lunda seller notes payable at a rate of 5% with interest payable annually and principal payable in 2016

 

 

21,750 

 

 

21,750 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan on transportation equipment at a variable LIBOR-based rate plus 2.4% payable in equal monthly installments over a seven-year period, with a balloon payment of $12.0 million in 2015

 

 

12,611 

 

 

13,363 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage on land and improvements at a variable LIBOR-based interest rate plus 3.00% payable in equal monthly installments over a 10-year period, with a balloon payment of $6.7 million in 2023.

 

 

9,144 

 

 

9,404 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgages on land and office building, both at a variable LIBOR-based interest rate plus 2.0% with principal on both payable in equal monthly installments over seven years. The seven-year mortgages include balloon payments in 2016 of $3.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively

 

 

6,306 

 

 

6,952 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage on office building at a variable rate of lender's prime rate (3.25%) less 1.0% payable in equal monthly installments over a ten-year period, with a balloon payment of $2.6 million in 2018

 

 

3,428 

 

 

3,671 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other indebtedness

 

 

10,880 

 

 

22,600 

Total

 

 

865,359 

 

 

733,884 

Less – current maturities

 

 

(81,292)

 

 

(114,658)

68NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 


Table of Contents

Long-term debt, net

$

784,067 

$

619,226 

Principal payments required under these obligations amount to approximately $81.3 million in 2015, $95.1 million in 2016, $51.0 million in 2017 $359.7 million in 2018, $126.5 million in 2019 and $151.8 million in 2020 and beyond.

7.625% Senior Notes due 2018



On OctoberApril 20, 2010,2017, the Company completed a private placement offering of $300issued $500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.625% senior unsecured notes due November 1, 2018 (the “Senior Notes”). The6.875% Senior Notes were priced at 99.258%, resulting in a yield to maturity of 7.75%. Thedue 2025 (the “2017 Senior Notes were made availableNotes”) in a private offering that is exempt fromplacement. Interest on the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The private placement of the2017 Senior Notes resultedis payable in proceeds to the Company of approximately $293.2 million after a debt discount of $2.2 million and initial debt issuance costs of $4.6 million. The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture (the “Indenture”), dated as of October 20, 2010 by and among the Company, its subsidiary guarantors and Wilmington Trust FSB, as trustee (the “Trustee”).

The Senior Notes mature on November 1, 2018, and bear interest at a rate of 7.625% per annum, payablearrears semi-annually in cash in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning onin November 2017.

Prior to May 1, 2011. 2020, the Company may redeem the 2017 Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus a “make-whole” premium described in the indenture. In addition, prior to May 1, 2020, the Company may redeem up to 40% of the original aggregate principal amount of the notes at a redemption price of 106.875% of their principal amount with the proceeds received by the Company from any offering of the Company’s equity. After May 1, 2020, the Company may redeem the 2017 Senior Notes at specified redemption prices described in the indenture. Upon a change of control, holders of the 2017 Senior Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or part of the 2017 Senior Notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.

The 2017 Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries that also guarantee obligations under the Company’s Amended2017 Credit Agreement.Facility, as defined below. In addition, the indenture for the 2017 Senior Notes provides for customary covenants, including events of default and restrictions on the payment of dividends and share repurchases.



2017 Credit Facility

On April 20, 2017, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “2017 Credit Facility”) with SunTrust Bank as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. The terms2017 Credit Facility provides for a $350 million revolving credit facility (the “2017 Revolver”) and a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit and swingline loans up to the aggregate amount of $150 million and $10 million, respectively, both maturing on April 20, 2022, unless any of the Indenture, among other things, limitConvertible Notes, as defined below, are outstanding on December 17, 2020, in which case all such borrowings will mature on December 17, 2020 (subject to certain further exceptions). In addition, the ability2017 Credit Facility permits additional borrowings in an aggregate amount of $150 million, which can be in the form of increased capacity on the 2017 Revolver or the establishment of one or more term loans.

Borrowings under the 2017 Revolver bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to a margin over (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin of between 1.50% and 3.00% or (b) a base rate (determined by reference to the highest of (i) the administrative agent’s prime lending rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points, (iii) the LIBOR rate for a one-month interest period plus 100 basis points and (iv) 0%), plus a margin of between 0.50% and 2.00%, in each case based on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the 2017 Credit Facility). In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the 2017 Credit Facility, the Company and its restricted subsidiarieswill pay a commitment fee to (i) incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred stock; (ii) pay dividends on, or make distributionsthe lenders under the 2017 Revolver in respect of the Company’s capital stock or repurchase the Company’s capital stock; (iii) make certain investments or other restricted payments; (iv) sell certain assets; (v) create liens or use assets as security in other transactions; (vi) merge, consolidate or transfer or disposeunutilized commitments thereunder. The Companywill pay customary letter of substantially all of the Company’s assets; and (vii) engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

The Senior Notes became redeemable, in whole or in part, any time on or after November 1, 2014, at the redemption prices specified in the Indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control triggering event specified in the Indenture, the Company must offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase.

The Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), which include nonpayment, breach of covenants in the Indenture, payment defaults or acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency.credit fees. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee or holdersotherwise applicable margin and letter of at least 25% in principal amountcredit fees will be increased by 2% per annum. The weighted-average annual interest rate on borrowings under the 2017 Revolver was approximately 3.89% during the year ended December 31, 2017.

The 2017 Credit Facility contains customary covenants for credit facilities of this type, including maximum consolidated leverage ratios ranging from 4.00:1.00 to 3.25:1.00 over the life of the outstanding Senior Notes may declarefacility and a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1.00. Substantially all of the principal, accrued and unpaid interest, if any,Company’s subsidiaries unconditionally guarantee the obligations of the Company under the 2017 Credit Facility; additionally, the obligations are secured by a lien on all personal property of the Senior Notes to be dueCompany and payable.its subsidiaries guaranteeing these obligations.



Amended Credit Agreement

On August 3, 2011As of December 31, 2017, there was $350.0 million available under the 2017 Revolver, and the Company entered into a Fifth Amended and Restatedhad not utilized the 2017 Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., and was amended by a Joinder Agreement dated October 21, 2011 executed by Becho, Inc. The Credit Agreement allowed the Company to borrow up to $300 million on a revolving credit basis (the “Revolving Facility”), with a $50 million sublimitFacility for letters of credit, and an additional $200 million term loan (the “Term Loan”).

On August 2, 2012, thecredit. The Company entered into a First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to its Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”)was in compliance with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer (the “Lender”). The First Amendment modified the financial covenants under the Amended2017 Credit Agreement beginning with the period ended September 30, 2012 to allow for more favorable minimum net worth, minimum fixed chargeFacility as of December 31, 2017.

Repurchase and maximum leverage ratios forRedemption of 2010 Senior Notes and Termination of 2014 Credit Facility

On April 20, 2017, the Company used proceeds from the 2017 Senior Notes and also2017 Revolver to add new financial covenants including minimum liquidityrepurchase or redeem its 2010 Senior Notes, to pay off its Term Loan and consolidated senior leverage ratio covenants. The First Amendment also increased2014 Revolver, and to pay accrued but unpaid interest and fees. In addition, the sublimit for lettersindenture governing the 2010 Senior Notes was satisfied and discharged, and the Company terminated the 2014 Credit Facility.

F-18


Table of credit from $50Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2010 Senior Notes

On October 20, 2010, the Company issued $300 million to $150 million.of 7.625% Senior Notes due November 1, 2018 (the “2010 Senior Notes”) in a private placement offering. As discussed above, on April 20, 2017, the Company repurchased or redeemed the 2010 Senior Notes in full and the related indenture was satisfied and discharged.

2014 Credit Facility



On June 5, 2014, the Company entered into a Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended (the “Credit“2014 Credit Facility”) restructuring its former $300 million revolving credit facility and $200 million Term Loan. All outstanding amounts under the Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were repaid in full using proceeds of the Credit Facility. The new agreement provides for a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility") and a $250 million term loan (the “Term Loan”), with Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. The 2014 Credit Facility provided for a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “2014 Revolver”), a $250 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) and a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit up to the aggregate amount of $150 million, all maturing on May 1, 2018. Borrowings under both the 2014 Revolver and the Term Loan principal is to be repaid on a quarterly basis, with 6.0% of the original total outstanding principal repaid in year 1, 9.0% in year 2, 12.0% in year 3, 15.0% in year 4 and 13.5% in year 5 along with a balloon payment of the remaining 44.5% due at maturity. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bearbore interest based either on Bank of America’s prime lending rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), each plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% to 3.00%, contingent upon the latest Consolidated Leverage Ratio.

As discussed above, on April 20, 2017, the Company repaid all borrowings under the 2014 Credit Facility and concurrently terminated the facility.

Convertible Notes

On June 15, 2016, the Company issued $200 million of 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2021 (the “Convertible Notes”) in a private placement offering. The Convertible Notes are unsecured obligations and do not contain any financial covenants or restrictions on the payments of dividends, the incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance or repurchase of securities by the Company. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 2.875% per year, payable in cash semi-annually in June and December.

To account for the Convertible Notes, the Company applied the provisions of ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (“ASC 470-20”). ASC 470-20 requires issuers of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This is done by allocating the proceeds from issuance to the liability component based on the fair value of the debt instrument excluding the conversion feature, with the residual allocated to the equity component and classified in additional paid in capital. The $46.8 million difference between the principal amount of the Convertible Notes ($200.0 million) and the proceeds initially allocated to the liability component ($153.2 million) is treated as a discount on the Convertible Notes. This difference is being amortized as non-cash interest expense using the interest method, as discussed below under Interest Expense. The equity component, however, is not subject to amortization nor subsequent remeasurement.

In addition, ASC 470-20 requires that the debt issuance costs associated with a convertible debt instrument be allocated between the liability and equity components in proportion to the allocation of the debt proceeds between these two components. The debt issuance costs attributable to the liability component of the Convertible Notes ($5.1 million) are also treated as a discount on the Convertible Notes and amortized as non-cash interest expense. The debt issuance costs attributable to the equity component ($1.5 million) were netted with the equity component and will not be amortized.

The following table presents information related to the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes:



 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

December 31,
2017

 

December 31,
2016

Liability component:

 

 

 

 

 

Principal

$

200,000 

 

$

200,000 

Conversion feature

 

(46,800)

 

 

(46,800)

Allocated debt issuance costs

 

(5,051)

 

 

(5,051)

Amortization of discount and debt issuance costs (non-cash interest expense)

 

13,486 

 

 

4,519 

Net carrying amount

$

161,635 

 

$

152,668 



 

 

 

 

 

Equity component:

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion feature

$

46,800 

 

$

46,800 

Allocated debt issuance costs

 

(1,543)

 

 

(1,543)

Deferred taxes

 

(18,815)

 

 

(18,815)

Net carrying amount

$

26,442 

 

$

26,442 

69F-19

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin. Borrowings

Prior to January 15, 2021, the Convertible Notes will be convertible only under the Term Loan bear interest based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin. Includedfollowing circumstances: (1) during the five business day period after any ten consecutive trading day period in the Credit Facility is a special provision allowing an additional accordion provision, which the Company may opt to utilize at a future date to increase either the Revolving Credit Facility or establish one or more new term loan commitments, up to an aggregate amount not to exceed $300 million. The Credit Facility provides a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit up to the aggregatetrading price per $1,000 principal amount of $150 million. BothConvertible Notes for such trading day was less than 98% of the Revolving Credit Facility andproduct of the Term Loan mature on June 5, 2019.

The Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan include usual and customary covenants for credit facilities of this type, including covenants providing maximum allowable ranges of consolidated leverage ratios from 3.75:1.00 to 2.75:1.00 over a range of five years and maintaining a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1.00. The Credit Facility eliminated the other covenant requirements that were formerly held under the Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.

Substantially alllast reported sale price of the Company’s subsidiaries unconditionally guaranteeCommon Stock and the obligationsconversion rate on each such trading day; (2) if the last reported sale price of the Company underCommon Stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the Credit Facility. The obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a lien on all personal propertylast trading day of the Company and its subsidiaries party thereto. Any outstanding loans underimmediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the Revolving Facility andconversion rate of 33.0579 (or $39.32) on each applicable trading day; or (3) upon the Term Loan matureoccurrence of specified corporate events. On or after January 15, 2021 until the close of business on June 5, 2019. The Term Loan balance was $242.5 million at December 31, 2014. The first quarterly term loan payment under the Credit Facility was due and paid on September 30, 2014. The Company was in compliance with the modified financial covenants under the Credit Facility for the period ended December 31, 2014.

The Company had $130.0 million of outstanding borrowings under its Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2014 and $135.0 million of outstanding borrowings under its former Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2013. The net change in borrowings under the Revolving Facility comprises all “Proceeds from debt” and a significant portion of all “Repayment of debt” as presented in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows. The Company utilized the Revolving Facility for letters of credit in the amount of $1.0 million as of December 31, 2014 and $0.2 million under the former Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2013. Accordingly, at December 31, 2014, the Company had $169.0 million available to borrow under the Revolving Facility.

On August 26, 2011, we entered into a swap agreement (“Swap Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A. to establish a long-term interest rate for the Term Loan discussed above. The Swap Agreement pertains to the Term Loan principal balance outstanding at January 31, 2012 and will remain effective throughsecond scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, in June 2016.. Amounts outstanding under the Swap Agreement will bear interest at a rate equal to, the Applicable Rate, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement (based upon our consolidated leverage ratio) plus 97.5 basis points. The Swap Agreement includes quarterly installments of principal and monthly installments of interest payable through the maturity date.

Debt Agreements from Acquisitions

In connection with the acquisition of Lunda, the Company issued to the former Lunda shareholders promissory notes in an aggregate amount of approximately $21.7 million (the “Lunda Seller Notes”). Interest under the Lunda Seller Notes accrues at the rate of 5% per annum with all accrued but unpaid interest payable annually. The Lunda Seller Notes mature on July 1, 2016. The Companyholders may prepayconvert all or any portion of their notes, in multiples of $1,000 principal amount, at the Lunda Selleroption of the holder regardless of the foregoing circumstances.

The Convertible Notes will be convertible at an initial conversion rate of 33.0579 shares of the Company’s Common Stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $30.25. The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment for some events but will not be adjusted for any time without premium or penalty. Toaccrued and unpaid interest. In addition, following certain corporate events that occur prior to the extent thatmaturity date, the Company prepays allis required to increase, in certain circumstances, the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert their Convertible Notes in connection with such a corporate event including customary conversion rate adjustments in connection with a “make-whole fundamental change” described in the indenture. Upon conversion, and at the Company’s election, the Company may satisfy its conversion obligation by paying or any portiondelivering, as applicable, cash, shares of its outstanding Senior Notes, it is also required to repayCommon Stock or a pro rata portion (based uponcombination of cash and shares of its Common Stock. As of December 31, 2017, the amount being prepaid under the Senior Notes and the total amount outstanding under the Senior Notes)conversion provisions of the Lunda Seller Notes. The Lunda SellerConvertible Notes are guaranteed by Lunda, which, as a result of the acquisition, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.have not been triggered.



Collateralized LoansEquipment Financing and Mortgages



During 2014 and 2013, theThe Company has certain loans entered into severalfor the purchase of specific property, plant and equipment and secured by the assets purchased. The aggregate balance of equipment financing arrangements for its existingloans was approximately $61.1 million and its recently acquired equipment fleets as discussed in more detail below. The Company attempted to take advantage of the opportunity to fix low interest rates for these fleets which has provided additional cash flows available for general corporate purposes.

During 2014, the Company obtained equipment financing totaling $46.5$84.9 million at fixedDecember 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with interest rates ranging from 2.12%1.90% to 2.69%, payable in5.93% with equal monthly installments for forty eightinstallment payments over periods up to sixty months.

During 2013,ten years with additional balloon payments of $12.4 million in 2021 and $6.3 million in 2022 on the Company obtained equipment financing totaling $25.8remaining loans outstanding at December 31, 2017. The aggregate balance of mortgage loans was approximately $15.7 million and $16.7 million at fixedDecember 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with interest rates ranging from 2.28%a fixed 2.50% to 3.09%, payable inLIBOR plus 3% and equal monthly installments for sixty months. We obtained a mortgage loaninstallment payments over periods up to seven years with additional balloon payments of $9.6$2.6 million collateralized by landin 2018, $2.9 million in 2021 and improvements located in Houston, Texas, with equal monthly installments over a 10-year period at LIBOR plus 3.00% with a balloon payment of $6.7$7.0 million due in 2023.



In JanuaryThe following table presents the future principal payments required under all of 2012, the Company obtained a mortgage loan of $2.1 million collateralized by land at a rate of 0.20% with 24 equal monthly installments of principal and interest and a balloon payment of $1.5 million that was paid in November of 2013.Company’s debt obligations, discussed above:



 

 

 



 

 

 

Year (in thousands)

 

 

2018

 

$

30,748 

2019

 

 

12,194 

2020

 

 

5,321 

2021

 

 

218,868 

2022

 

 

7,457 

Thereafter

 

 

507,319 



 

 

781,907 

Less: Unamortized discount and issuance costs

 

 

(45,631)

Total

 

$

736,276 

70F-20

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Interest Expense

Interest Expense as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income consists of the following:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For the year ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Cash interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on 2017 Senior Notes

$

23,967 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Interest on 2017 Credit Facility

 

5,517 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Interest on 2010 Senior Notes

 

6,926 

 

 

22,875 

 

 

22,875 

Interest on 2014 Credit Facility

 

4,455 

 

 

19,201 

 

 

14,368 

Interest on Convertible Notes

 

5,750 

 

 

3,115 

 

 

 —

Other interest

 

3,261 

 

 

3,623 

 

 

5,805 

Cash portion of loss on extinguishment

 

1,913 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total cash interest expense

 

51,789 

 

 

48,814 

 

 

43,048 

Non-cash interest expense(a):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs on 2017 Senior Notes

 

516 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Amortization of debt issuance costs on 2017 Credit Facility

 

962 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Amortization of discount and debt issuance costs on 2010 Senior Notes

 

308 

 

 

1,002 

 

 

979 

Amortization of debt issuance costs on 2014 Credit Facility

 

1,703 

 

 

5,447 

 

 

1,116 

Amortization of discount and debt issuance costs on Convertible Notes

 

8,967 

 

 

4,519 

 

 

 —

Non-cash portion of loss on extinguishment

 

5,139 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total non-cash interest expense

 

17,595 

 

 

10,968 

 

 

2,095 

Total interest expense

$

69,384 

 

$

59,782 

 

$

45,143 

(a)   The combination of cash and non-cash interest expense produces effective interest rates that are higher than contractual rates. Accordingly, the effective interest rates for the 2017 Senior Notes and the Convertible Notes were 7.13% and 9.39%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Leases



The Company leases certain construction equipment, vehicles and office space under non-cancelablenon-cancellable operating leases. Futureleases, with future minimum rent payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2014 are2017 as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

(in thousands)

2015

 

$

22,394 

2016

 

 

17,699 

2017

 

 

13,659 

2018

 

 

8,762 

2019

 

 

7,175 

Thereafter

 

 

29,733 

Subtotal

 

$

99,422 

Less -  Sublease rental agreements

 

 

(491)

 

 

$

98,931 



 

 

 



 

 

 

Year (in thousands)

 

 

2018

 

$

18,420 

2019

 

 

12,424 

2020

 

 

8,980 

2021

 

 

6,240 

2022

 

 

5,524 

Thereafter

 

 

14,898 



 

 

66,486 

Less: Sublease rental agreements

 

 

(2,291)

Total

 

$

64,195 



Rental expense under operating leases of construction equipment, vehicles and office space was $24.4$27.4 million in 2014,  $18.52017, $28.2 million in 20132016 and $17.7$17.4 million in 2012.2015.

  

[5] Income Taxes

Income (Loss) before taxes is summarized as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

Foreign

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

Operations

 

Operations

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

2014

 

$

170,517 

 

 

16,921 

 

 

187,438 

2013

 

$

127,682 

 

$

11,933 

 

$

139,615 

2012

 

$

(271,683)

 

$

3,841 

 

$

(267,842)

The (benefit) provision for income taxes is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(in thousands)

Current expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

45,074 

 

$

29,034 

 

$

19,573 

State

 

 

11,174 

 

 

9,018 

 

 

3,508 

Foreign

 

 

3,203 

 

 

4,256 

 

 

1,542 

Total current

 

 

59,451 

 

 

42,308 

 

 

24,623 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred (benefit) expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

9,992 

 

 

9,547 

 

 

(28,157)

State

 

 

10,059 

 

 

577 

 

 

1,104 

Foreign

 

 

 —

 

 

(113)

 

 

(12)

Total deferred

 

 

20,051 

 

 

10,011 

 

 

(27,065)

Total (benefit) provision

 

$

79,502 

 

$

52,319 

 

$

(2,442)

71


Table of Contents

The following table is a reconciliation of the Company’s provision (benefit) for income taxes at the statutory rates to the provision (benefit) for income taxes at the Company’s effective rate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

Federal income expense (benefit) at statutory tax rate

 

$

65,603 

 

35.0 

%

 

$

48,865 

 

35.0 

%

 

$

(93,745)

 

35.0 

%

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

 

 

10,367 

 

5.5 

 

 

 

6,236 

 

4.5 

 

 

 

3,214 

 

(1.2)

 

Officers' compensation

 

 

3,657 

 

2.0 

 

 

 

1,732 

 

1.2 

 

 

 

1,473 

 

(0.6)

 

Domestic Production Activities Deduction

 

 

(5,170)

 

(2.8)

 

 

 

(3,641)

 

(2.6)

 

 

 

(2,246)

 

(2.4)

 

Goodwill Impairment

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 

89,191 

 

(33.3)

 

Impact of state tax rate changes on deferreds

 

 

3,245 

 

1.7 

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

Other

 

 

1,800 

 

1.0 

 

 

 

(873)

 

(0.6)

 

 

 

(329)

 

3.4 

 

(Benefit) provision for income taxes

 

$

79,502 

 

42.4 

%

 

$

52,319 

 

37.5 

%

 

$

(2,442)

 

0.9 

%

The Company’s provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2014 were significantly impacted by a shift in revenue from projects in higher-tax jurisdictions causing a rise in the state tax rate.  The higher state tax rate was applied to deferred tax balances which further increased the effective rate.

The Company’s provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2012 were significantly impacted by the goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge discussed in Note 3 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Of the total goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge of $376.6 million, approximately $255.0 million pertained to goodwill that had no corresponding tax basis. The tax effect of the impairment charge resulted in a reduction in the Company’s provision for income taxes of approximately $50.2 million in 2012.

The following is a summary of the significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(in thousands)

Deferred Tax Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timing of expense recognition

 

$

47,017 

 

$

24,170 

Net operating losses

 

 

2,188 

 

 

4,123 

Other, net

 

 

6,980 

 

 

5,641 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

56,185 

 

 

33,934 

Valuation Allowance

 

 

(1,369)

 

 

(2,817)

Net deferred tax assets

 

 

54,816 

 

 

31,117 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Tax Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets, due primarily to purchase accounting

 

 

(26,094)

 

 

(18,260)

Fixed assets, due primarily to purchase accounting

 

 

(90,886)

 

 

(79,243)

Construction contract accounting

 

 

(6,854)

 

 

(6,432)

Joint ventures - construction

 

 

(30,654)

 

 

(5,229)

Contested Legal Settlement

 

 

 —

 

 

(12,012)

Other

 

 

(10,012)

 

 

(3,408)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(164,500)

 

 

(124,584)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(109,684)

 

$

(93,467)

72


Table of Contents

The net deferred tax liability is classified in the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on  when the  future benefit (expense) is expected to be realized as  follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(in thousands)

Current deferred tax asset

 

$

17,962 

 

$

8,240 

Long-term deferred tax asset

 

 

36,854 

 

 

22,877 

Current deferred tax liability

 

 

(14,129)

 

 

(10,251)

Long-term deferred tax liability

 

 

(150,371)

 

 

(114,333)

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(109,684)

 

$

(93,467)

At December 31, 2013 the Company had a valuation allowance of $2.8 million and at December 31, 2014, the Company had a valuation allowance of $1.4 million for federal and state capital loss-carry-forwards as the ultimate utilization of this item was less than “more likely than not.” 

In general, it is the practice and intention of the Company to reinvest the earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations. Generally, such amounts become subject to U.S. taxation upon the remittance of dividends and under certain other circumstances. As of the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries, which have been or are intended to be permanently invested, aggregated approximately $15.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of deferred tax liability related to investments in these foreign subsidiaries.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, in the first quarter of 2007. It is the Company’s policy to record any accrued interest and penalties as part of the income tax provision. During 2013, the Company recognized a net increase of $1.4 million in liabilities. The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2013 is $5.5 million. Included in this liability is $0.5 million of related interest. During 2014, the Company recognized a net increase of $2.2 million in liabilities. The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2014 is $7.6 million. Included in this liability is $0.8 million of related interest. The Company does not expect any significant release of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the gross unrecognized tax benefit is as follows (in thousands):

Gross unrecognized tax benefit balance at January 1, 2012

$

2,043 

Add:

Additions based on tax positions related to current year

1,281 

Additions/reductions for tax positions of prior years

1,857 

Less:

Reductions for tax positions of prior years (expiration of statute of limitations)   

(1,158)

Gross unrecognized tax benefit balance at December 31, 2012

$

4,023 

Gross unrecognized tax benefit balance at January 1, 2013

$

4,023 

Add:

Additions based on tax positions related to current year

1,254 

Additions/reductions for tax positions of prior years

182 

Less:

Reductions for tax positions of prior years (expiration of statute of limitations)   

 —

Gross unrecognized tax benefit balance at December 31, 2013

$

5,459 

Gross unrecognized tax benefit balance at January 1, 2014

$

5,459 

Add:

Additions based on tax positions related to current year

2,929 

Additions/reductions for tax positions of prior years

426 

Less:

Reductions for tax positions of prior years (expiration of statute of limitations)   

(1,178)

Gross unrecognized tax benefit balance at December 31, 2014

$

7,636 

The company records interest and penalties related to an unrecognized tax benefit in income tax expenses. Interest expense of $0.4 million was recorded during 2014.

73


Table of Contents

[6] Other Assets, Other Long-term Liabilities and Other Income (Expense), Net

Other Assets, Other Long-term Liabilities and Other Income (Expense), Net consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(in thousands)

Other Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance claim receivable (1)

 

$

36,945 

 

$

34,839 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

36,854 

 

 

22,877 

Deferred costs

 

 

 —

 

 

7,711 

Mineral reserves

 

 

3,199 

 

 

3,199 

Deposits

 

 

671 

 

 

677 

Other long-term assets

 

 

10,228 

 

 

6,311 

 

 

$

87,897 

 

$

75,614 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Long-term Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition related liabilities

 

$

32,814 

 

$

51,102 

Insurance claim payable (1)

 

 

36,897 

 

 

34,774 

Pension liability

 

 

32,403 

 

 

19,831 

Employee benefit related liabilities

 

 

2,476 

 

 

2,536 

Mineral royalties payable

 

 

1,727 

 

 

1,727 

Deferred lease incentive

 

 

462 

 

 

1,143 

Other

 

 

8,017 

 

 

6,745 

 

 

$

114,796 

 

$

117,858 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(in thousands)

Other Income (Expense), Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest  income

 

$

4,793 

 

$

8,745 

 

$

2,842 

Gain on sale of property used in operations

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

456 

Adjustment of acquisition related liabilities

 

 

(5,972)

 

 

(26,374)

 

 

(256)

Amortization of deferred costs

 

 

(1,397)

 

 

(1,844)

 

 

(1,585)

Bank fees

 

 

(1,236)

 

 

(1,559)

 

 

(2,090)

Realized loss on sale of investments, net

 

 

(1,851)

 

 

72 

 

 

(2,699)

Miscellaneous income (expense), net

 

 

(3,873)

 

 

2,385 

 

 

1,475 

 

 

$

(9,536)

 

$

(18,575)

 

$

(1,857)

______________

(1)

Insurance claims receivable and the corresponding insurance claims payable represent expected insurable loss amounts to be received from the insurance carriers and to be paid in claims respectively.

[7] Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Company has a defined benefit pension plan that covers certain of its executive, professional, administrative and clerical employees, subject to certain specified service requirements. The plan is noncontributory and benefits are based on an employee’s years of service and “final average earnings”, as defined. The plan provides reduced benefits for early retirement and takes into account offsets for social security benefits. The Company also has an unfunded supplemental retirement plan (“Benefit Equalization Plan”) for certain employees whose benefits under the defined benefit pension plan were reduced because of compensation limitations under federal tax laws. Effective June 1, 2004, all benefits accruals under the Company’s pension plan and Benefit Equalization Plan

74


Table of Contents

were frozen; however, the current vested benefit was preserved. Pension disclosure as presented below includes aggregated amounts for both of the Company’s plans, except where otherwise indicated.

The Company historically has used the date of its fiscal year-end as its measurement date to determine the funded status of the plan.

A summary of net periodic benefit cost is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

 

$

4,144 

 

 

$

3,710 

 

 

$

4,011 

 

  Return on plan assets

 

 

(4,797)

 

 

 

(4,509)

 

 

 

(4,783)

 

  Recognized net actuarial losses

 

 

4,385 

 

 

 

6,330 

 

 

 

5,487 

 

  Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

3,732 

 

 

$

5,531 

 

 

$

4,715 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial assumptions used to determine net cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Discount rate

 

 

4.47% 

%

 

 

3.58% 

%

 

 

4.10% 

%

  Expected return on assets

 

 

6.75% 

%

 

 

6.75% 

%

 

 

7.00% 

%

  Rate of increase in compensation

 

 

n.a.

 

 

 

n.a.

 

 

 

n.a.

 

The target asset allocation for the Company’s pension plan by asset category for 2014 and the actual asset allocation at December 31, 2014 and 2013 by asset category are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31,

 

 

Target

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset Category

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

Cash

 

5.0 

%

 

6.2 

%

 

5.2 

%

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

65.0 

 

 

62.9 

 

 

63.4 

 

International

 

25.0 

 

 

25.9 

 

 

25.9 

 

Fixed income securities

 

5.0 

 

 

5.0 

 

 

5.5 

 

Total

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

The Company’s target allocation for 2014 will include 65.0% domestic equity securities, 25.0% international equity securities, and 5.0% fixed income securities.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, plan assets included approximately $45.5 million and $44.7 million, respectively, of investments in hedge funds which do not have readily determinable fair values. The underlying holdings of the funds are comprised of a combination of assets for which the estimate of fair value is determined using information provided by fund managers.

The Company expects to contribute approximately $2.3 million to its defined benefit pension plan in 2015. Future benefit payments under the plans are estimated as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

2015

 

$

6,288 

2016

 

 

6,359 

2017

 

 

6,392 

2018

 

 

6,557 

2019

 

 

6,644 

Thereafter

 

 

33,459 

 

 

$

65,699 

75


Table of Contents

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of plan assets and plan benefit obligations during 2014 and 2013, and a summary of the funded status as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(in thousands)

Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

72,617 

 

$

66,137 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

3,711 

 

 

8,545 

Company contribution

 

 

5,213 

 

 

3,478 

Benefit payments

 

 

(5,585)

 

 

(5,543)

Balance at end of year

 

$

75,956 

 

$

72,617 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(in thousands)

Change in Benefit Obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

95,178 

 

$

105,320 

Interest cost

 

 

4,144 

 

 

3,710 

Assumption change loss (gain)

 

 

17,054 

 

 

(9,627)

Actuarial loss

 

 

132 

 

 

1,318 

Benefit payments

 

 

(5,585)

 

 

(5,543)

Balance at end of year

 

$

110,923 

 

$

95,178 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(in thousands)

Funded Status

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded status at December 31,

 

$

(34,967)

 

$

(22,561)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

$

(218)

 

$

(194)

Long-term liabilities

 

 

(34,749)

 

 

(22,367)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net amount recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

$

(34,967)

 

$

(22,561)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(in thousands)

Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and included in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

(56,147)

 

$

(42,261)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(56,147)

 

 

(42,261)

Cumulative Company contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost

 

 

21,180 

 

 

19,700 

Net amount recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

$

(34,967)

 

$

(22,561)

The net actuarial gain arising during the period, netted against the amortization of the previously existing actuarial loss resulted in a net other comprehensive loss of $13.9 million in 2014, and a net comprehensive gain of $18.7 million in 2013 and  $1.7 million in 2012. Other comprehensive loss attributable to a change in the unfunded projected benefit obligation amounted to a net increase of $59.3 million recognized in prior years. The cumulative net amount of $56.2 million represents the excess of the projected benefit obligations of the Company’s pension plans over the fair value of the plans’ assets as of December 31, 2014, compared to $42.3 million of contributions in excess of the net periodic benefit cost previously recognized. The net amount of $34.9 million is reflected as a liability as of December 31, 2014 with the offset being a reduction in stockholders’ equity. Adjustments to the amount of this

76


Table of Contents

pension liability will be recorded in future years, as required, based upon periodic re-evaluation of the funded status of the Company’s pension plans.

The estimated amount of the net accumulated loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net period benefit cost in 2014 is $5.8 million.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

Actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

3.75 

%

 

4.47 

%

Rate of increase in compensation

 

n.a.

 

 

n.a.

 

Measurement date

 

December 31

 

 

December 31

 

The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption remained at 6.75% for 2013 and 2014. The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption was developed considering forward looking capital market assumptions and historical return expectations for each asset class assuming the Company’s target asset allocation and full availability of invested assets.

The following table sets forth the plan assets at fair value in accordance with the fair value hierarchy described in Note 2 — Fair Value Measurements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Significant

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Total Value

 

 

(in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

4,693 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

4,693 

Fixed Income

 

 

3,824 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,824 

Equities

 

 

7,676 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,676 

Mutual Funds

 

 

6,550 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

6,550 

Equity Partnerships

 

 

 —

 

 

7,723 

 

 

 —

 

 

7,723 

Hedge Fund Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

1,010 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,010 

Long-Short Equity Fund

 

 

 —

 

 

15,878 

 

 

12,755 

 

 

28,633 

Event Driven Fund

 

 

 —

 

 

3,471 

 

 

9,562 

 

 

13,033 

Distressed Credit

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,320 

 

 

1,320 

Multi-Strategy Fund

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,494 

 

 

1,494 

Total

 

$

23,753 

 

$

27,072 

 

$

25,131 

 

$

75,956 

77


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Significant

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

At December 31, 2013

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Total Value

 

 

(in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

3,762 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

3,762 

Fixed Income

 

 

4,000 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

4,000 

Mutual Funds

 

 

13,234 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13,234 

Equity Partnerships

 

 

 —

 

 

6,876 

 

 

 —

 

 

6,876 

Hedge Fund Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

527 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

527 

Long-Short Equity Fund

 

 

 —

 

 

14,566 

 

 

11,655 

 

 

26,221 

Event Driven Fund

 

 

 —

 

 

5,928 

 

 

8,752 

 

 

14,680 

Distressed Credit

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,429 

 

 

1,429 

Multi-Strategy Fund

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,888 

 

 

1,888 

Total

 

$

21,523 

 

$

27,370 

 

$

23,724 

 

$

72,617 

Fund strategies seek to capitalize on inefficiencies identified across different asset classes or markets. Hedge fund strategy types include long-short, event driven, multi-strategy and distressed credit. Generally the redemption of the Company’s hedge fund investments is subject to certain notice-period requirements and as such the Company has classified these assets as Level 3 assets.

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Level 3 assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in Fair Value of Level 3 Assets

 

 

Long-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short

 

Event

 

 

 

 

Multi-

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

Driven

 

Distressed

 

Strategy

 

 

 

 

 

Fund

 

 

Fund

 

Credit

 

Fund

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

10,863 

 

$

8,863 

 

$

2,199 

 

$

1,799 

 

$

23,724 

Realized gains

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13 

 

 

 

 

16 

Unrealized gains

 

 

843 

 

 

505 

 

 

57 

 

 

59 

 

 

1,464 

Purchases

 

 

1,049 

 

 

16 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,076 

Sales

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,512)

 

 

(954)

 

 

(373)

 

 

(3,839)

Transfer to Level 2 (1)

 

 

 —

 

 

2,690 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,690 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

12,755 

 

$

9,562 

 

$

1,320 

 

$

1,494 

 

$

25,131 

______________

(1)

The transfer of $2.7 million from Level 3 to Level 2 was comprised of certain hedge funds that were moved due to liquidity classifications.  

78


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in Fair Value of Level 3 Assets

 

 

Long-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short

 

Event

 

 

 

 

Multi-

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

Driven

 

Distressed

 

Strategy

 

 

 

 

 

Fund

 

 

Fund

 

Credit

 

Fund

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

9,992 

 

$

7,152 

 

$

2,559 

 

$

1,950 

 

$

21,653 

Realized gains

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(7)

 

 

(5)

 

 

(12)

Unrealized gains

 

 

2,971 

 

 

1,252 

 

 

158 

 

 

223 

 

 

4,604 

Purchases

 

 

1,343 

 

 

459 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,817 

Sales

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(517)

 

 

(378)

 

 

(895)

Transfer to Level 2 (2)

 

 

(3,443)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,443)

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

10,863 

 

$

8,863 

 

$

2,199 

 

$

1,799 

 

$

23,724 

______________

(2)

The transfer of $3.4 million from Level 3 to Level 2 was comprised of certain hedge funds that became redeemable within 90 days from December 31, 2014.

The Company’s plans have benefit obligations in excess of the fair value of the plans’ assets. The following table provides information relating to each of the plans’ benefit obligations compared to the fair value of its assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014

 

At December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

Pension

 

Equalization

 

 

 

 

Pension

 

Equalization

 

 

 

 

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Total

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Projected benefit obligation

 

$

107,570 

 

$

3,353 

 

$

110,923 

 

$

91,946 

 

$

3,232 

 

$

95,178 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

$

107,570 

 

$

3,353 

 

$

110,923 

 

$

91,946 

 

$

3,232 

 

$

95,178 

Fair value of plan assets

 

$

75,956 

 

$

 —

 

$

75,956 

 

$

72,617 

 

$

 —

 

$

72,617 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation greater than fair value of plan assets

 

$

31,614 

 

$

3,353 

 

$

34,967 

 

$

19,329 

 

$

3,232 

 

$

22,561 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation greater than fair value of plan assets

 

$

31,614 

 

$

3,353 

 

$

34,967 

 

$

19,329 

 

$

3,232 

 

$

22,561 

Section 401(k) Plans

The Company has several contributory Section 401(k) plans which cover its executive, professional, administrative and clerical employees, subject to certain specified service requirements. The 401(k) expense provision approximated $3.6 million in 2014,  $3.8 million in 2013 and $3.8 million in 2012. The Company’s contribution is based on a non-discretionary match of employees’ contributions, as defined.

Cash-Based Compensation Plans

The Company has multiple cash-based compensation plans and a stock-based incentive compensation plan for key employees which are generally based on the Company’s achievement of a certain level of profit. For information on the Company’s stock-based incentive compensation plan, see Note 10 — Stock-Based Compensation.

Multiemployer Plans

The Company also contributes to various multi-employer union retirement plans under collective bargaining agreements which provide retirement benefits for substantially all of its union employees. The Company’s participation in the plans that it considers to be significant for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, is outlined in the tables below. The “EIN/Pension Plan Number” column provides the Employer Identification Number (EIN) and the three-digit plan number, if applicable. Unless otherwise noted, the most recent Pension Protection Act zone status available in 2014 and 2013 is for the plan’s year-end at December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively. The zone status is based on information that the Company received from the plan and is certified by the plan’s actuary. Among other factors, plans in the red zone are generally less than 65 percent funded, plans in the yellow zone are

79


Table of Contents

less than 80 percent funded, and plans in the green zone are at least 80 percent funded. The “FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented” column indicates plans for which a financial improvement plan (FIP) or a rehabilitation plan (RP) is either pending or has been implemented. The last column lists the expiration date(s) of the collective-bargaining agreement(s) to which the plans are subject. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a contributor to a multi-employer plan is liable, only upon termination or withdrawal from a plan, for its proportionate share of a plan’s unfunded vested liability. The Company currently has no intention of withdrawing from any of the multiemployer pension plans in which it participates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIP/RP 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

Pension Protections Act

 

Status

 

Company Contributions

 

 

 

Collective

 

 

EIN/Pension

 

Zone Status

 

Pending Or

 

(amounts in millions)

 

Surcharge

 

Bargaining

Pension Fund

 

Plan Number

 

2014

 

2013

 

Implemented

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Imposed

 

Agreement

Pension, Hospitalization and Benefit Plan of the Electrical Industry - Pension Trust Account

 

13-6123601 / 001

 

Green

 

Green

 

No

 

11.8 (b)

(a)

 

13.4 (b)

(a)

 

12.9 (b)

 

 

No

 

5/8/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steamfitters Industry Pension Fund

 

13-6149680 / 001

 

Yellow

 

Yellow

 

Implemented

 

5.1 (b)

(a)

 

4.3 (b)

(a)

 

3.5 (b)

 

 

No

 

6/30/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Excavators Union Local 731 Pension Fund

 

13-1809825 / 002

 

Green

 

Green

 

No

 

5.3 

 

 

3.2 

 

 

3.3 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California

 

94-6050970 / 001

 

Red

 

Red

 

Implemented

 

1.8 

 

 

2.1 

 

 

2.3 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2015

______________

(a)

These amounts exceeded 5% of the respective total plan contributions.

In addition to the individually significant plans described above, the Company also contributed approximately $35.5 million in 2014,  $31.6 million in 2013 and $29.9 million in 2012 to other multiemployer pension plans.

[8]6.     Contingencies and Commitments



The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in litigation and are contingently liable for commitments and performance guarantees arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company and certain of its clientscustomers have made claims arising from the performance under their contracts. The Company recognizes certain significant claims for recovery of incurred cost when it is probable that the claim will result in additional contract revenue and when the amount of the claim can be reliably estimated. These assessments require judgments concerning matters such as litigation developments and outcomes, the anticipated outcome of negotiations, the number of future claims, and the cost of both pending and future claims. In addition, because most contingencies are resolved over long periods of time, assets and liabilities may change in the future due to various factors. Management believes that,

F-21


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

based on current information and discussions with the Company’s legal counsel, the ultimate resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



Several matters are in the litigation and dispute resolution process. The following discussion provides a background and current status of thesethe more significant matters.

Tutor-Saliba-Perini Joint Venture vs. Los Angeles MTA Matter

During 1995 Tutor-Saliba-Perini (“Joint Venture”) filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles against the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“LAMTA”), seeking to recover costs for extra work required by LAMTA in connection with the construction of certain tunnel and station projects, all of which were completed by 1996. In 1999, LAMTA countered with civil claims under the California False Claims Act against the Joint Venture, Tutor-Saliba and the Company jointly and severally (together, “TSP”), and obtained a judgment that was reversed on appeal and remanded for retrial before a different judge.

Between 2005 and 2010, the court granted certain Joint Venture motions and LAMTA capitulated on others, which reduced the number of false claims LAMTA may seek and limited LAMTA’s claims for damages and penalties. In September 2010, LAMTA dismissed its remaining claims and agreed to pay the entire amount of the Joint Venture’s remaining claims plus interest. In the remanded proceedings, the Court subsequently entered judgment in favor of TSP and against LAMTA in the amount of $3.0 million after deducting $0.5 million, representing the tunnel handrail verdict plus accrued interest against TSP. The parties filed post-trial motions for costs and fees. The Court ruled that TSP’s sureties could recover costs, LAMTA could recover costs for the tunnel handrail trial, and no party could recover attorneys’ fees. TSP is appealing the false claims jury verdict on the tunnel handrail claim and other issues, including the denial of TSP’s and its sureties’ request for attorneys’ fees. LAMTA subsequently filed its cross-appeal. In June 2014, the Court of Appeal issued its decision reversing judgment on the People’s Unfair Competition claim and the denial of TSP’s Sureties’ request for attorney’s fees and affirming the remainder of the judgment. LAMTA subsequently filed a

80


Table of Contents

request for hearing before the California Supreme Court, challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision that TSP’s Sureties are entitled to attorney’s fees. In September 2014, the Supreme Court denied the MTA’s petition for Review. In September 2014, the Court of Appeal remitted the case back to the trial court to make further rulings consistent with the decision of the Court of Appeal. In November 2014, the court set the hearing on the motion for TSP’s Surety’s attorney’s fees for March 2015. In January 2015, payment was made by LAMTA in the amount of $3.8 million.

The Company does not expect this matter to have any material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Perini/Kiewit/Cashman Joint Venture-Central Artery/Tunnel Project Matter

Perini/Kiewit/Cashman Joint Venture (“PKC”), a joint venture in which the Company holds a 56% interest and is the managing partner, is currently pursuing a series of claims, instituted at different times since 2000, for additional contract time and/or compensation against the Massachusetts Highway Department (“MHD”) for work performed by PKC on a portion of the Central Artery/Tunnel (“CA/T”) project in Boston, Massachusetts. During construction, MHD ordered PKC to perform changes to the work and issued related direct cost changes with an estimated value, excluding time delay and inefficiency costs, in excess of $100 million. In addition, PKC encountered a number of unforeseen conditions during construction that greatly increased PKC’s cost of performance. MHD has asserted counterclaims for liquidated damages and back charges.

Certain of PKC’s claims have been presented to a Disputes Review Board (“DRB”), which consists of three construction experts chosen by the parties. To date, five DRB panels issued several awards and interim decisions in favor of PKC’s claims, amounting to total awards to PKC in excess of $128 million plus interest, of which $110 million were binding awards.

In December 2010, the Suffolk County Superior Court granted MHD’s motion for summary judgment to vacate the Third DRB Panel’s awards to PKC for approximately $56.5 million on the grounds that the arbitrators do not have authority to decide whether particular claims are subject to the arbitration provision of the contract. MHD subsequently moved to vacate approximately $13.7 million of the Fourth DRB Panel’s total awards to PKC on the same arbitrability basis that the Third DRB’s awards were vacated. In October 2011, the Suffolk County Superior Court followed its earlier arbitrability rulings holding that the Fourth DRB exceeded its authority in deciding arbitrability with respect to certain of the Fourth DRB Panel’s awards (approximately $8 million of the $13.7 million discussed above). PKC appealed the Superior Court decisions and in January 2013, the Superior Court decisions were affirmed in MHD’s favor. The Appeals Court remanded the case back to the lower court to determine how and by whom the claims must be decided. PKC filed an application for further appellate review by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and a motion for reconsideration in the Appeals Court. The Appeals Court rejected PKC’s petition for rehearing. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied the application in June 2013.

In February 2012, PKC received a $22 million payment for an interest award associated with the Second DRB panel’s awards to PKC. In January 2013, PKC received a $14.8 million payment for back charges and interest associated with the Fourth DRB panel’s awards to PKC that were confirmed.

In June 2014, the Superior Court issued a decision granting PKC's motion in its entirety. The Court concluded that the Engineer's Decisions concerning the arbitrability of PKC's claims were based on error of law and were unsupported by substantial evidence. The Court vacated the Engineer's Decisions on the arbitrability of PKC's claims. The Court also concluded that PKC's claims are subject to arbitration. The Court reinstated the DRB's arbitration awards on those claims, and made clear that its decision pertains to the awards of DRB3 as well as awards of the DRB4. DRB5 will convene to award interest on DRB3 and DRB4 awards, and the Court will then enter judgment in PKC’s favor on the total amount. As a result of the Judge’s Order, PKC has increased its anticipated recovery to $88.7 million which includes interest. In October 2014, PKC reached agreement with MHD on the total amount owed, including interest. Management booked the impact of this settlement during the third quarter of 2014. In December 2014, payment was made by MHD in the amount of $88.7 million. This matter is now closed.



Long Island Expressway/Cross Island Parkway Matter



The Company reconstructed the Long Island Expressway/Cross Island Parkway Interchange project for the New York State Department of Transportation (the “NYSDOT”). The $130 million project was substantially completed in January 2004 and was accepted by the NYSDOT as finally complete in February 2006. The Company incurred significant added costs in completing its work and suffered extended schedule costs due to numerous design errors, undisclosed utility conflicts, lack of coordination with local agencies and other interferences for which the Company believes that the NYSDOT is responsible.



In March 2011, the Company filed its claim and complaint with the New York State Court of Claims and served to the New York State Attorney General’s Office, seeking damages in the amount of $53.8 million. In May 2011, the NYSDOT filed a motion to dismiss the Company’s claim on the grounds that the Company had not provided required documentation for project closeout and filing of a claim. In September 2011, the Company reached agreement on final payment with the Comptroller’s Office on behalf of the NYSDOT, which resulted in an amount of $0.5 million payable to the Company and formally closed out the project which allowedallowing the

81


Table of Contents

Company’s claim Company to be re-filed.re-file its claim. The Company re-filed its claim in the amount of $53.8 million with the NYSDOT in February 2012 and with the Court of Claims in March 2012. In May 2012, the NYSDOT served its answer and counterclaims in the amount of $151 million alleging fraud in the inducement and punitive damages related to disadvantaged business enterprise (“DBE”) requirements for the project. The Court subsequently ruled that NYSDOT’s counterclaims may only be asserted as a defense and offset to the Company’s claims and not as affirmative claims. In November 2014, the Appellate Division First Department affirmed the dismissal of the City’s affirmative defenses and affirmative counterclaims based on DBE fraud. The Company does not expect the counterclaimcounterclaims to have any material effect on its consolidated financial statements. Discovery was completed during 2017 and the Company is currently awaiting the establishment of a trial date.



Management has made an estimate of the total anticipated recovery on this project, and such estimate is included in revenue recorded to date. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement varies from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements at that time.



Fontainebleau Matter



Desert Mechanical, Inc. (“DMI”) and Fisk Electric Company (“Fisk”), wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, were subcontractors on the Fontainebleau Project in Las Vegas (“Fontainebleau”), a hotel/casino complex with approximately 3,800 rooms. In June 2009, Fontainebleau filed for bankruptcy protection, under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, in the Southern District of Florida. Fontainebleau is headquartered in Miami, Florida.



DMI and Fisk filed liens in Nevada for approximately $44 million, representing unreimbursed costs to date and lost profits, including anticipated profits. Other unaffiliated subcontractors have also filed liens. In June 2009, DMI filed suit against Turnberry West Construction, Inc. (“Turnberry”), the general contractor, in the 8th Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada (the “District Court”), and in May 2010, the court entered an order in favor of DMI for approximately $45 million.



In January 2010, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of the property to Icahn Nevada Gaming Acquisition, LLC, and this transaction closed in February 2010. As a result of a July 2010 ruling relating to certain priming liens, there was approximately $125 million set aside from this sale whichthat is available for distribution to satisfy the creditor claims based on seniority. At that time, the total estimated sustainable lien amount was approximately $350 million. The project lender filed suit against the mechanic’s lien claimants, including DMI and Fisk, alleging that certain mechanic’s liens are invalid and that all mechanic’s liens are subordinate to the lender’s claims against the property. The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in October 2012 in an advisory opinion at the request of the Bankruptcy Court that lien priorities would be determined in favor of the mechanic lien holders under Nevada law.



In October 2013, a settlement was reached by and among the Statutory Lienholders and the other interested parties. The agreed upon settlement has not had an impact onBankruptcy Court appointed a mediator to facilitate the Company’s recorded accounting position as of the period and periods ended December 31, 2014. The execution of that settlement agreement, continues underbut the supervisionparties were unable to settle. During the third quarter of 2017, DMI filed a mediator appointedmotion seeking permission to file an action in Nevada; the motion was granted by the Bankruptcy Court.

F-22


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Management has made an estimate of the total anticipated recovery on this project, and such estimate is included in revenue recorded to date. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement varies from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements at that time.

MGM CityCenter Matter

Tutor Perini Building Corp. (“TPBC”) (formerly Perini Building Company, Inc.), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, contracted with MGM MIRAGE Design Group (“MGM”) in March 2005 to construct the CityCenter project in Las Vegas, Nevada. The project, which encompasses nineteen separate contracts, is a 66-acre urban mixed use development consisting of hotels, condominiums, retail space and a casino.

The Company achieved substantial completion of the project in December 2009, and MGM opened the project to the public on the same date. In March 2010, the Company filed suit against MGM and certain other property owners in the Clark County District Court alleging several claims including breach of contract, among other items.

In a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by MGM in March 2010, and in subsequent communications issued, MGM asserted that it believes it owes substantially less than the claimed amount and that it has claims for losses in connection with the construction of the Harmon Tower and is entitled to unspecified offsets for other work on the project. According to MGM, the total of the offsets and the Harmon Tower claims exceed the amount claimed by the Company.

In May 2010, MGM filed a counterclaim and third party complaint against the Company and its subsidiary TPBC. The court granted the Company and MGM’s joint motion to consolidate all subcontractor initiated actions into the main CityCenter lawsuit. In July 2012, the Court granted MGM’s motion to demolish the Harmon Tower, one of the CityCenter buildings, as a “business decision.”

Evidence had been presented at the Harmon related hearings that the Harmon Tower could be repaired for approximately $21 million, more than $15 million of which is due to design defects that are MGM’s responsibility. In mid-September 2012, MGM filed a request

82


Table of Contents

for additional destructive testing of the Harmon Tower. In October 2012, the Court ruled it would allow additional testing but with certain conditions including but not limited to the Court’s withdrawing MGM’s right to demolish the Harmon Tower and severing the Harmon Tower defects issue from the rest of the case. In February 2013, MGM filed third-party complaints against the project designers, which were resolved through third party settlements including $33.0 million attributable to MGM’s alleged damages on the Harmon, effective October 2013. In early April 2013, MGM started additional destructive testing of the Harmon Tower.

With respect to alleged losses at the Harmon Tower, the Company has contractual indemnities from the responsible subcontractor, as well as insurance coverage. The Company’s insurance carrier initiated legal proceedings seeking declaratory relief that their insurance policies do not provide for defense or coverage for matters pertaining to the Harmon Towers. Those proceedings are stayed pending the outcome of the underlying dispute in Nevada District Court. The Company is not aware of a basis for other claims that would amount to material offsets against what MGM owes to the Company. The Company does not expect this matter to have any material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

During July 2013, a settlement was reached for $39.8 million related to outstanding receivables for various subcontractors, which included consideration for, and brought resolution to, disputes between the Company’s subsidiaries Fisk and DMI and MGM. Payment was received in August 2013.

As of December 2014, MGM has reached agreements with subcontractors to settle $348 million of amounts previously billed to MGM. The Company has reduced and will continue to reduce amounts included in revenues, cost of construction operations, accounts receivable and accounts payable for the reduction in subcontractor pass-through billings, which the Company would not expect to have an impact on recorded profit. As of December 2014, the Company had approximately $145.3 million recorded as contract receivables for amounts due and owed to the Company.

In January 2014, the Parties reached a confidential settlement on most of the non-Harmon Tower related issues, including the majority of the Company’s affirmative claims. On or about October 27, 2014, a second agreement was reached for previously disputed items as the Court ordered mediation remained in progress for unresolved claims. The trial began on October 28, 2014.

On December 12, 2014, and December 31, 2014,  Tutor Perini Corporation and Tutor Perini Building Corp. (collectively “Tutor Perini”) reached multiple settlements with MGM Mirage Resorts International and CityCenter Holdings, LLC (collectively “CityCenter”) regarding the CityCenter Project and the litigation which commenced in 2010. The settlement was entered into under confidential terms which fully resolve all material disputes between Tutor Perini, CityCenter, and the related subcontractors, except for Show Canada. Management booked the impact of this settlement, which did not differ materially from balances recorded as of September 2014, during the fourth quarter of 2014. During February 2015, payment was received in full. This matter is now closed.



Honeywell Street/Queens Boulevard Bridges Matter



In 1999, the Company was awarded a contract for reconstruction of the Honeywell Street/Queens Boulevard Bridges project for the City of New York (the “City”). In June 2003, after substantial completion of the project, the Company initiated an action to recover $8.8 million in claims against the City on behalf of itself and its subcontractors. In March 2010, the City filed counterclaims for $74.6 million and other relief, alleging fraud in connection with the DBE requirements for the project. In May 2010, the Company served the City with its response to the City’s counterclaims and affirmative defenses. In November 2014,August 2013, the Appellate Division First Department affirmedCourt granted the dismissal ofCompany’s motion to dismiss the City’s affirmitiveaffirmative defenses and counterclaims based on DBErelating to fraud.

In January 2017, the Court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the Company’s claim against the City. The Company has filed a notice of appeal. The Court also granted the Company’s motion for summary judgment for release of retention plus interest from 2010 for an aggregate amount of approximately $1.2 million, which the City paid during the fourth quarter of 2017.



The Company does not expect ultimate resolution of this matter to have anya material effect on its consolidated financial statements.



Westgate Planet Hollywood Matter



Tutor-Saliba Corporation (“TSC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was contracted to construct a time sharetimeshare development project in Las Vegas, which was substantially completed in December 2009. The Company’s claims against the owner, Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC (“WPH”), relate to unresolved owner change orders and other claims. The Company filed a lien on the project in the amount of $23.2 million and filed its complaint with the District Court, Clark County, Nevada. Several subcontractors have also recorded liens, some of which have been released by bonds and some of which have been released as a result of subsequent payment. WPH has posted a mechanic’s lien release bond for $22.3 million.



WPH filed a cross-complaint alleging non-conforming and defective work for approximately $51 million, primarily related to alleged defects, misallocated costs and liquidated damages. Some or all of the allegations will be defended by counsel appointed by TSC’s insurance carrier. WPH has since revised the amount of their counterclaims to approximately $45 million.



Following multiple post-trial motions, final judgment was entered in this matter on March 20, 2014. TSC was awarded total judgment in the amount of $19.7 million on its breach of contract claim, which includes an award of interest up through the date of judgment, plus attorney’s fees and costs. WPH has paid $0.6 million of that judgment. WPH was awarded total judgment in the amount of $3.1 

83


Table of Contents

million on its construction defect claims, which includes interest up through the date of judgment. The awards are not offsetting. WPH and its Sureties have filed a notice of appeal. TSC has filed a notice of appeal on the defect award. In July 2014, the Court ordered WPH to post an additional supersedeas bond on appeal, in the amount of $1.7 million, in addition to the lien release bond of $22.3 million, which increases the security up to $24.0 million. In May 2017, the Nevada Supreme Court issued its ruling on the appeal by WPH and its Sureties. With only minor adjustments, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the lower district court’s judgment, and following further proceedings in the lower district court, the anticipated final recovery to the Company is estimated to exceed $20 million, including interest and recovery of certain attorneys’ fees and costs, of which the Company collected more than $16 million in 2017. In December 2017 and in January 2018, the Court issued several post-appeal orders confirming its previous rulings.



The Company does not expect ultimate resolution of this matter to have any material effect on its consolidated financial statements. Management has made an estimate of the total anticipated recovery on this project and such estimate is included in revenue recorded to date. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement varies from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements at that time.

100th Street Bus Depot Matter

The Company constructed the 100th Street Bus Depot for the New York City Transit Authority (“NYCTA”) in New York. Prior to receiving notice of final acceptance from the NYCTA, this project experienced a failure of the brick facade on the building due to faulty subcontractor work. The Company has not yet received notice of final acceptance of this project from the NYCTA. The Company contends defective structural installation by the Company’s steel subcontractor caused or was a causal factor of the brick facade failure.

The Company tendered its claim to the NYCTA OCIP and to Chartis Claims, Inc. (“Chartis”), its insurance carrier. Coverage was denied in January 2011. The OCIP and general liability carriers filed a declaratory relief action in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York against the Company seeking court determination that no coverage is afforded under their policies. In mid-February 2012, the Company filed a third-party action against certain underwriters (“Lloyd’s”). In mid-November 2012, the Court granted Chartis’ and Lloyd’s respective motions for summary judgment without oral argument. In 2013, parties filed appellate briefs and the matter at the time was under submission in the Court of Appeal. On May 6, 2014, the 2nd Circuit Court issued a summary order affirming the trial court’s decision on the grounds of late notice. Management booked the impact of this judgment during the second quarter of 2014, resulting in a charge against the company’s earnings. This matter is now closed.

Brightwater Matter

In 2006, the Department of Natural Resources and Parks Wastewater Treatment Division of King County (“King County”), as Owner, and Vinci Construction Grands Projects/Parsons RCI/Frontier-Kemper, Joint Venture (“VPFK”), as Contractor, entered into a contract to construct the Brightwater Conveyance System and tunnel sections in Washington State. Frontier-Kemper, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is a 20% minority partner in the joint venture.

In April 2010, King County filed a lawsuit alleging damages in the amount of $74 million, plus costs, for VPFK’s failure to complete specified components of the project in the King County Superior Court, State of Washington. Shortly thereafter, VPFK filed a counterclaim in the amount of approximately $75 million, seeking reimbursement for additional costs incurred as a result of differing site conditions, King County’s defective specifications, for damages sustained on VPFK’s tunnel boring machines (“TBM”), and increased costs as a result of hyperbaric interventions. VPFK’s claims related to differing site conditions, defective design specifications, and damages to the TBM were presented to a Dispute Resolution Board (“DRB”). King County amended the amount sought in its lawsuit to approximately $132 million. In August 2011, the DRB generally found that King County was liable to VPFK for VPFK’s claims for encountering differing site conditions, including damages to the TBM, but not on VPFK’s alternative theory of defective specifications. From June through August 2012, each party filed several motions for summary judgment on certain claims and requests in preparation for trial, which were heard and ruled upon by the Court. The Court granted and denied various requests of each party related to evidence and damages.

In December 2012, a jury verdict was received in favor of King County in the amount of $155.8 million and a verdict in favor of VPFK in the amount of $26.3 million. In late April 2013, the Court ruled on post-trial motions and ordered VPFK’s sureties to pay King County’s attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $14.7 million. All other motions were denied. On May 7, 2013, VPFK paid the full verdict amount and the associated fees, thus terminating any interest on the judgment. VPFK’s notice of appeal was filed on May 31, 2013. Oral argument is scheduled for March 9, 2015.

The ultimate financial impact of King County’s lawsuit is not yet specifically determinable. In the fourth quarter of 2012, management developed a range of possible outcomes and has recorded a charge to income and a contingent liability of $5.0 million in accrued expenses. In developing a range of possible outcomes, management considered the jury verdict, continued litigation and potential settlement strategies. Management determined that there was no estimate within the range of possible outcomes that was more probable than the other and recorded a liability at the low end of the range. As of December 31, 2014, there were no changes in facts or circumstances that led management to believe that there were any changes to the probability of outcomes. The amount of payments in excess of the established contingent liability is recorded in Accounts Receivable on the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014. Estimating and recording future outcomes of litigation proceedings require significant judgment and assumptions about the future, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. If a final recovery turns out to be

84


Table of Contents

materially less favorable than our estimates, this may have a significant impact on the Company’s financial results. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement varies from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the financial statements at that time.

156 Stations Matter

In December 2003, Five Star Electric Corporation (“FSE”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an agreement with the Prime Contractor Transit Technologies, L.L.C (“Transit”), a Consortium member of Siemens Transportation Transit Technologies, L.L.C (“Siemens”), to assist in the installation of new public address and customer information screens system for each of the 156 stations for the New York City Transit Authority (“NYCTA”) as the owner. Work on the project commenced in early 2004 and was substantially completed.

In June 2007, FSE submitted a Demand for Arbitration against Transit to terminate FSE’s subcontract due to: the execution of a Cure Agreement between the NYCTA, Siemens and Transit, which amended FSE’s rights under the Prime Contract; Transit’s failure to provide information and equipment to allow work to progress according to the approved schedule, and Transit’s failure to tender payment in excess of a year. In June 2012, the arbitration panel awarded FSE a total of approximately $11.9 million to be paid within 45 days, and Transit’s claims were denied. FSE filed a motion to confirm arbitration award in District Court in July 2012. In late August 2012, Transit Technologies filed a cross petition to vacate the award. In November 2012, the Court granted FSE’s petition to confirm the arbitration award and denied Transit Technologies’ cross-petition to vacate the award. In February 2013, the Court affirmed FSE’s award and entered judgment in the amount of $12.3 million including award, costs and interest.  The deadline for Transit to file an appeal regarding the judgment passed on April 4, 2013, rendering the judgment final for all purposes

In a related matter, in May 2014, the court decided that only $8.5 million of the total arbitration award of $11.9 million can be recovered aganst the payment bond. In December 2014, FSE filed its reply for the motion for re-argument with regard to the reduction in recoverable costs against the payment bond.

Settlement discussions have taken place with Siemens to avoid further litigation. The eventual resolution of this matter is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.



U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Matter

Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. (“R&S”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a contract with the United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA” or “Owner”) for the construction of a 287,000 square-foot facility for NOAA’s Southwest Fisheries Science Center Replacement Headquarters and Laboratory in La Jolla, California. The contract work began on May 24, 2010 and was substantially completed in September 2012. R&S incurred significant additional costs as a result of a design that contained errors and omissions, NOAA’s unwillingness to correct design flaws in a timely fashion and a refusal to negotiate the time and pricing associated with change order work.

R&S has filed two certified claims against NOAA for contract adjustments related to the unresolved Ownerowner change orders, delays, design deficiencies and other claims. The First Certified Claim

F-23


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In March 2017, the parties agreed to a proposed settlement, which was submitted on August 20, 2013,subsequently approved and paid by the government in the amountthird quarter of $26.8 million ("First Certified Claim") and2017. The settlement did not have a material impact on the second certified claim was submitted on October 30, 2013, inCompany’s financial results for the amount of $2.6 million ("Second Certified Claim").year ended December 31, 2017.



NOAA requested an extensionFive Star Electric Matter

In the third quarter of nine months to issue2015, Five Star Electric Corp. ("Five Star"), a decision onwholly owned subsidiary of the First Certified Claim, but did not request an extension of timeCompany that was acquired in 2011, entered into a tolling agreement (which has since expired) related to review of the Second Certified Claim. On January 6, 2014, R&S filed suit inan ongoing investigation being conducted by the United States Federal CourtAttorney’s Office for the Eastern District of ClaimsNew York (“USAO EDNY”). Five Star has been cooperating with the USAO EDNY since late June 2014, when it was first made aware of the investigation, and has provided information requested by the government related to its use of certain minority-owned, women-owned, small and disadvantaged business enterprises and certain of Five Star’s employee compensation, benefit and tax practices.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the investigation and cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss or range of loss that Five Star or the Company may incur or the impact of the results of the investigation on Five Star or the Second Certified Claim plus interestCompany.

Alaskan Way Viaduct Matter

In January 2011, Seattle Tunnel Partners (“STP”), a joint venture between Dragados USA, Inc. and attorney's fees and costs. This was followed by submissionthe Company, entered into a design-build contract with the Washington State Department of Transportation (“WSDOT”) for the construction of a law suit onlarge diameter bored tunnel in downtown Seattle, King County, Washington to replace the First Certified Claim on July 31, 2014.Alaskan Way Viaduct, also known as State Route 99.

The construction of the large diameter bored tunnel required the use of a tunnel boring machine (“TBM”). In October 2014,December 2013, the court orderedTBM struck a steel pipe, installed by WSDOT as a well casing for an exploratory well. The TBM was damaged and was required to be shut down for repair. STP has asserted that the two lawsuits be consolidated for purposes of oral argument onsteel pipe casing was a differing site condition that WSDOT failed to properly disclose. The Disputes Review Board mandated by the respective Motionscontract to Dismiss.hear disputes issued a decision finding the steel casing was a Type I differing site condition. WSDOT has not accepted that finding.



ManagementThe TBM was insured under a Builder’s Risk Insurance Policy (the “Policy”) with Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC and a consortium of other insurers (the “Insurers”). STP submitted the claims to the Insurers and requested interim payments under the Policy. The Insurers refused to pay and denied coverage. In June 2015, STP filed a lawsuit in the King County Superior Court, State of Washington (“Washington Superior Court”) seeking declaratory relief concerning contract interpretation, as well as damages as a result of the Insurers’ breach of their obligations under the terms of the Policy. WSDOT is deemed a plaintiff since WSDOT is an insured under the Policy and had filed its own claim for damages. Hitachi Zosen (“Hitachi”), the manufacturer of the TBM, has madealso joined the case as a plaintiff for costs incurred to repair the damages to the TBM. Trial is scheduled for October 2018. Discovery is ongoing.

In March 2016, WSDOT filed a complaint against STP in Thurston County Superior Court for breach of contract alleging STP’s delays and failure to perform and declaratory relief concerning contract interpretation. STP filed its answer to WSDOT’s complaint and filed a counterclaim against WSDOT and Hitachi. Trial is set for April 2019. Discovery is ongoing.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company has concluded that the potential for a material adverse financial impact due to the Insurers’ denial of coverage and WSDOT’s legal actions is neither probable nor remote, and the potential loss or range of loss is not reasonably estimable. With respect to STP’s claims against the Insurers, WSDOT and Hitachi, management has included an estimate of the total anticipated recovery, on this project,concluded to be both probable and such estimate is includedreliably estimable, in revenuereceivables or costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings recorded to date. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement variesrecoveries vary from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the financial statements at that time.

  

7.     Other Income, Net

On May 31, 2017, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”), as successor in interest to Banc of America Securities LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (collectively “BofA”), to resolve the pending litigation between the Company and Merrill Lynch. The litigation, which was filed by the Company in 2011, related to the purchase by the Company of certain auction-rate securities from BofA.

85F-24

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

[9] Capital Stock

(a) Common Stock

On September 8, 2008,June 6, 2017, the Company’s shareholders approved an increaseCompany received the $37.0 million cash settlement payment agreed to in the numbersettlement agreement, and the pending litigation was dismissed with prejudice. Neither party made any admission of authorized sharesliability or wrongdoing, and the settlement agreement includes mutual releases of common stock from 40 million sharesall claims and liabilities related to 75 million shares. On the same day, the Company acquired allsubject matter of the outstanding shares of Tutor-Saliba in exchange for 22,987,293 shares of the Company’s common stock. These shares are subject to certain liquidation restrictions contained in a shareholders agreement between Mr. Tutor, the Company and other former Tutor-Saliba shareholders. As of December 31, 2014, Mr. Tutor had beneficial ownership of approximately 8,406,375 shares of the Company’s common stock.

(b) Common Stock Repurchase Program

On March 19, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors extended the common stock repurchase program put into place on November 13, 2008. The program allowed the Company to repurchase up to $100 million of its common stock through March 31, 2011, at which time the program expired.

There were no repurchases made during 2011. During 2010, the Company repurchased and cancelled 2,164,840 shares under the program for an aggregate purchase price of $39.4 million. On a cumulative basis during 2008 through 2010, the Company repurchased and cancelled 4,168,238 shares under the program for an aggregate purchase price of $71.2 million, or an average purchase price per share of $17.08.

(c) Preferred Stockpending litigation.



The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 sharesrecognized the settlement as a gain during the second quarter of preferred stock.  At2017 and reported it as a component of other income, net in its Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no preferred shares issued and outstanding.2017.

8.     Share-Based Compensation





[10] Stock-Based Compensation

On April 3, 2017, the Company adopted the Tutor Perini Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan

The Company is authorized to grant up to 8,500,000 stock-based compensation awards to key executives, employees and directors of (“Compensation Plan”), which was approved by the Company underCompany’s shareholders on May 24, 2017. Additionally, the Company’s Amended and Restated Tutor Perini Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”(“Incentive Plan” together with Compensation Plan the “Plans”). is still active. The Plan allows stock-based compensation awards to be granted in a varietyPlans provide for various types of forms,share-based grants, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock unit awards,and unrestricted stock awards, deferredunits and stock awardsoptions. Restricted and dividend equivalent rights. The terms and conditions ofunrestricted stock units give the awards granted are established byholder the Compensation Committeeright to exchange their stock units for shares of the Company’s Board of Directors who also administersCommon Stock on a one-for-one basis. Per the Plan.

A total of 659,740Plans, stock options give the holder the right to purchase shares of common stock are available for future grant under the Plan at December 31, 2014.

Restricted Stock Unit Awards

Restricted stock unit awards generally vest subject to the satisfaction of service requirements or the satisfaction of both service requirements and achievement of certain performance targets. Upon vesting, each award is exchanged for one share of the Company’s common stock. TheCommon Stock subsequent to the grant date at an defined exercise price equal to or greater than the fair values of these awards are determined based on the closing pricevalue of the Company’s common stockCommon Stock on either the award date (if subject only to service conditions), or the date thatof the Compensation Committee establishes the applicable performance target (ifstock option’s award. Restricted stock units and stock options are usually subject to certain service and performance conditions).conditions and may not be sold or otherwise transferred until those restrictions have been satisfied; however, unrestricted stock units have no such restrictions. The related compensation expenseterm for stock options is amortized overlimited to 10 years from the applicable requisite service period.date of grant. The Compensation Plan allows for 2,335,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to be issued. As of December 31, 2014,2017, there were 1,554,364 shares available to be granted under the Compensation Committee has approvedPlan and 405,529 shares authorized to be issued under the grantIncentive Plan; however, as discussed in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) filed on April 13, 2017, the Company will not issue the 405,529 shares remaining in the Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2017, the Incentive Plan had an aggregate of 5,976,4304,360,018 of restricted stock unitunits and stock options from outstanding, historical awards to eligible participants.that either have not vested or have vested but have not been exercised.



The restricted stock unitterms of the Plans give the Company the right to settle the vesting of share-based grants in cash or shares. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company paid approximately $0.6 million to settle share-based awards.

Many of the awards granted in 2014,  2013issued under the Plans contain separate tranches, each for a separate performance period and 2012 had weighted-averageeach with a performance target to be established subsequent to the award date; accordingly, the tranches are accounted for under ASC 718, Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) as separate grants, with the grant date fair valuesbeing the date the performance targets for a given tranche are established and communicated to the grantee. Similarly, for these awards, compliance with the requirements of $27.10,  $19.87 and $14.39, respectively. The grant date fair valuethe Plan is determinedalso based on the closing pricenumber of units granted in a given year, as determined by ASC 718, rather than the Company’s commonnumber of units awarded in a given year. As a result, as of December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding awards with 214,000 restricted stock onunits and 194,000 stock options that had not been granted yet. These units will be granted in 2018 and 2019 when the date of grant.performance targets for those respective years are established. 

86F-25

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following table summarizes restricted stock unit and stock option activity:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Restricted Stock Units

 

Stock Options



 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

Weighted-



 

 

Average

 

 

 

Average



 

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

Exercise/



 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(Strike) Price



Number

 

Per Share

 

Number

 

Per Share

Outstanding as of December 31, 2014

1,056,597 

 

$

26.54 

 

1,989,000 

 

$

19.63 

Granted

321,500 

 

 

23.07 

 

259,000 

 

 

16.07 

Expired or forfeited

(281,560)

 

 

23.89 

 

(250,000)

 

 

15.97 

Vested/exercised

(370,940)

 

 

27.07 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Outstanding as of December 31, 2015

725,597 

 

$

25.28 

 

1,998,000 

 

$

19.62 

Granted

483,387 

 

 

19.14 

 

274,000 

 

 

16.20 

Vested/exercised

(52,500)

 

 

18.74 

 

(97,500)

 

 

12.72 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2016

1,156,484 

 

$

22.64 

 

2,174,500 

 

$

19.50 

Granted

1,064,000 

 

 

30.02 

 

539,000 

 

 

24.54 

Expired or cancelled

(20,985)

 

 

23.91 

 

(19,466)

 

 

26.56 

Vested/exercised

(801,515)

 

 

19.38 

 

(140,000)

 

 

21.41 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2017

1,397,984 

 

$

30.11 

 

2,554,034 

 

$

20.45 

The following table presents the compensation expense recognized relatedsummarizes unrestricted stock units, which are generally issued to the restricted stock unit awards which is included in general and administrative expenses innon-employee members of the Consolidated StatementsCompany’s Board of Operations:Directors as part of their annual retainer fees:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(in millions)

Restricted Stock Compensation Expense

 

$

13.4 

 

$

4.9 

 

$

7.1 

Related Income Tax Benefit

 

$

5.4 

 

$

1.9 

 

$

1.5 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



 

Unrestricted Stock Units



 

 

 

Weighted-Average Grant

Year

 

Number

 

Date Fair Value Per Share

2015

 

68,160

 

$

21.93 

2016

 

64,603

 

 

21.67 

2017

 

99,155

 

 

26.26 



The fair value of unrestricted stock units issued during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $2.6 million, $1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

The fair value of restricted stock units that vested during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $25.3 million, $1.0 million and $8.0 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value, representing the difference between the market value on the date of exercise and the option price of the stock options exercised during 2017 and 2016 was $1.3 million and $1.1 million, with a corresponding tax benefit of $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, there was $15.5 million2017, the balance of unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvestedunamortized restricted stock unit awardsand stock option expense was $22.5 million and $3.7 million, respectively, which absent significant forfeitures in the future, is expected towill be recognized over a weighted-average periodperiods of approximately 2.8 years.

During 2014, the Compensation Committee established the 2014 performance targets2.6 years for 866,500 restricted stock units awarded in 2014,  2013, and 2012 and the 2015 performance target2.2 years for 120,097 restricted stock units awarded in 2014. During 2014, the Compensation Committee approved the award of 788,097 new restricted stock units.options. 

A summary of restricted stock unit awards activity during the year ended December 31, 2014 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-Average

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

Number

 

Grant Date

 

Value

 

 

 

of Shares

 

Fair Value

 

(in thousands)

Granted and Unvested - January 1, 2014

 

 

361,668 

 

$

17.30 

 

$

9,512 

Vested

 

 

(281,668)

 

$

16.76 

 

$

8,049 

Granted

 

 

996,597 

 

$

27.10 

 

$

23,988 

Forfeited

 

 

(20,000)

 

$

24.77 

 

$

 —

Total Granted and Unvested

 

 

1,056,597 

 

$

26.54 

 

$

25,432 

Approved for grant

 

 

749,000 

 

 

(a)

 

$

18,028 

Total Awarded and Unvested - December 31, 2014

 

 

1,805,597 

 

 

n.a.

 

$

43,461 

______________

(a)

Grant date fair value cannot be determined currently because the related performance targets for future years have not yet been established by the Compensation Committee.



The 2,554,034 outstanding unvested restricted stock unit awards atoptions as of December 31, 2014 are scheduled to vest as follows, subject where applicable to the achievement2017 had an intrinsic value of performance targets. As described above, certain performance targets$13.6 million and a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 4.4 years. Of those outstanding options: a) 1,988,034 were exercisable with an intrinsic value of $12.8 million, a weighted-average exercise price of $19.31 per share and a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 3.3 years; b) 566,000, with an intrinsic value of $0.7 million, a weighted-average exercise price of $24.27 and a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 8.2 years, have been granted but have not yet been established.vested; and c) of the 566,000 granted but unvested options, 527,816 are expected to vest.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number

Vesting Date

 

of Awards

2015

 

390,500 

2016

 

202,500 

2017

 

857,597 

2018

 

196,000 

2019

 

159,000 

 

 

1,805,597 

Approximately 53,000 of the unvested restricted stock unit awards will vest based on the satisfaction of service requirements and 1,752,597 will vest based on the satisfaction of both service requirements and the achievement of pre-tax income performance targets.

Stock Options

Stock option awards generally vest subject to the satisfaction of service requirements or the satisfaction of both service requirements and achievement of certain performance targets. The grant date fair values of these awards are determined based on the Black-Scholes option price model on either the award date (if subject only to service conditions), or the date that the Compensation Committee

87F-26

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

establishes the applicable performance target (if subject to performance conditions). The related compensation expense is amortized over the applicable requisite service period. The exercise price of the options is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stockfair value on the grant date the awards were approved by the Compensation Committee, and the awards expire ten years from the award date. As of December 31, 2014, the Compensation Committee has approved an aggregate of 3,085,465 stock option awards to eligible participants.

The stock option awards grantedsignificant assumptions used in 2014,  2013 and 2012 had weighted-average grant date fair values of $17.69,  $7.90 and $5.65, respectively. The grant date fair value is determined based on the Black-Scholes option pricingoption-pricing model as discussed below.

The following table presents the compensation expense recognized related to stock option grants which is included in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(in millions)

Stock Option Compensation Expense

 

$

5.2 

 

$

1.7 

 

$

2.4 

Related Income Tax Benefit

 

$

2.1 

 

$

0.7 

 

$

1.0 

As of December 31, 2014, there was $7.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the outstanding stock option grants which, absent significant forfeitures in the future, is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of approximately 2.7 years.

During 2014, the Compensation Committee established the 2014 performance targets for 380,000 stock options awarded in 2012 and 84,000 stock options awarded in 2013. During 2014, the Compensation Committee approved the award of, and set performance targets for, 250,000 new stock options.

A summary of stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2014 isare as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-Average

 

 

 

Number

 

Grant Date

 

Exercise

 

 

 

of Shares

 

Fair Value

 

Price

Total Granted and Outstanding - January 1, 2014

 

 

1,295,000 

 

$

9.94 

 

$

20.20 

Granted

 

 

714,000 

 

$

17.69 

 

$

18.40 

Exercised

 

 

(20,000)

 

$

7.25 

 

$

12.54 

Forfeited

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total Granted and Outstanding

 

 

1,989,000 

 

$

12.75 

 

$

19.63 

Approved for grant

 

 

636,000 

 

 

(a)

 

 

17.62 

Total Awarded and Outstanding - December 31, 2014

 

 

2,625,000 

 

 

n.a.

 

 

19.14 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Total stock options granted

 

539,000 

 

 

 

274,000 

 

 

 

259,000 

 

Weighted-average grant date fair value

$

13.11 

 

 

$

5.31 

 

 

$

12.48 

 

Weighted-average assumptions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-free rate

 

1.81 

%

 

 

1.2 

%

 

 

1.3 

%

Expected life of options(a)

 

4.8 

 

 

 

4.2 

 

 

 

4.7 

 

Expected volatility(b)

 

43.09 

%

 

 

40.6 

%

 

 

45.5 

%

Expected quarterly dividends

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

______________

(a)

Grant date fair value cannot be determined currently becauseCalculated using the related performance targets for future years have not yet been established bysimplified method due to the Compensation Committee.terms of the stock options and the limited pool of grantees.

(b)

Calculated using historical volatility of the Company’s Common Stock over periods commensurate with the expected life of the option.



There were 1,210,000 options that have vested and were exercisable atFor the respective years ended December 31, 2014 at a weighted-average exercise price2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized, as part of $20.35 per share.general and administrative expenses, costs for share-based payment arrangements for employees of $19.6 million, $13.4 million and $9.5 million. Additionally for the same periods, the Company also recognized as part of general and administrative expenses costs for share-based awards to non-employee directors of $1.6 million, $1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The aggregate tax benefits for these awards were approximately $8.7 million, $6.1 million and $4.6 million, for the respective periods.



Of the remaining options outstanding, approximately 475,000 will vest

9.     Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Company has a defined benefit pension plan that covers certain of its executive, professional, administrative and clerical employees, subject to certain specified service requirements. The plan is noncontributory and benefits are based on the satisfactionan employee’s years of service requirements and 2,150,000 will vest based on“final average earnings,” as defined by the satisfactionplan. The plan provides reduced benefits for early retirement and takes into account offsets for social security benefits. The Company also has an unfunded supplemental retirement plan (“Benefit Equalization Plan”) for certain employees whose benefits under the defined benefit pension plan were reduced because of compensation limitations under federal tax laws. Effective June 1, 2004, all benefit accruals under the Company’s pension plan and Benefit Equalization Plan were frozen; however, the current vested benefit was preserved. Pension disclosure as presented below includes aggregated amounts for both service requirements andof the achievement of performance targets.Company’s plans, except where otherwise indicated.



At December 31, 2014,The Company historically has used the outstanding optionsdate of 1,989,000 hadits year-end as its measurement date to determine the funded status of the plan.

The long-term investment goals of the Company’s plan are to manage the assets in accordance with the legal requirements of all applicable laws; produce investment returns which maximize return within reasonable and prudent levels of risks; and achieve a fully funded status with regard to current pension liabilities. Some risk must be assumed in order to achieve the investment goals. Investments with the ability to withstand short and intermediate term variability are considered and some interim fluctuations in market value and rates of return are tolerated in order to achieve the plan’s longer-term objectives.

The pension plan’s assets are managed by a third-party investment manager. The Company monitors investment performance and risk on an intrinsic value of $10.4 million and a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 5.9 years.ongoing basis.

88F-27

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

A summary of net periodic benefit cost is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Interest cost

$

3,919 

 

 

$

4,153 

 

 

$

4,055 

 

Service cost

 

850 

 

 

 

600 

 

 

 

 —

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(4,358)

 

 

 

(4,803)

 

 

 

(5,021)

 

Recognized net actuarial losses

 

1,897 

 

 

 

1,745 

 

 

 

1,869 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

$

2,308 

 

 

$

1,695 

 

 

$

903 

 

Actuarial assumptions used to determine net cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

3.90 

%

 

 

4.10 

%

 

 

3.75 

%

Expected return on assets

 

6.00 

%

 

 

6.00 

%

 

 

6.50 

%

Rate of increase in compensation

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

The target asset allocation for the Company’s pension plan by asset category for 2018 and the actual asset allocation as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 by asset category are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31,



 

Target

 

 

 



 

Allocation

 

 

Actual Allocation

Asset Category

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

Cash

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

Equity funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

37 

 

 

 

41 

 

 

 

47 

 

International

 

28 

 

 

 

31 

 

 

 

28 

 

Fixed income funds

 

30 

 

 

 

25 

 

 

 

21 

 

Total

 

100 

%

 

 

100 

%

 

 

100 

%

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, plan assets included approximately $30.7 million and $39.1 million, respectively, of investments in hedge funds and equity partnerships which do not have readily determinable fair values. The underlying holdings of the funds were comprised of a combination of assets for which the estimate of fair value is determined using information provided by fund managers.

The Company expects to contribute approximately $2.8 million to its defined benefit pension plan in 2018.

Future benefit payments under the plans are estimated as follows:



 

 



 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2018

$

6,748 

2019

 

6,798 

2020

 

6,781 

2021

 

6,785 

2022

 

6,721 

2023-2027

 

32,410 

Total

$

66,243 

F-28


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of plan assets and plan benefit obligations during 2017 and 2016, and a summary of the funded status as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

66,057 

 

$

72,296 

Actual return on plan assets

 

9,224 

 

 

(1,909)

Company contribution

 

2,838 

 

 

2,025 

Benefit payments

 

(6,578)

 

 

(6,355)

Balance at end of year

$

71,541 

 

$

66,057 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Change in Benefit Obligations

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

103,681 

 

$

105,942 

Interest cost

 

3,919 

 

 

4,153 

Service cost

 

850 

 

 

600 

Assumption change (gain) loss

 

3,854 

 

 

308 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

492 

 

 

(967)

Benefit payments

 

(6,578)

 

 

(6,355)

Balance at end of year

$

106,218 

 

$

103,681 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Funded status

$

(34,677)

 

$

(37,624)

Net unfunded amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

$

(279)

 

$

(271)

Long-term liabilities

 

(34,398)

 

 

(37,353)

Total net unfunded amount recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

$

(34,677)

 

$

(37,624)

Amounts not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost and included in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of net actuarial losses before income taxes of $58.7 million and $61.1 million, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In 2017, net other comprehensive income of $2.4 million consisted of reclassification adjustments for the amortization of previously existing actuarial losses and net actuarial gains arising during the period. In 2016 and 2015, net actuarial losses arising during the years were partially offset by reclassification adjustments for the amortization of previously existing actuarial losses and resulted in net other comprehensive losses of $4.3 and $0.7 million, respectively.

The estimated amount of the net accumulated loss (consisting of net actuarial losses) that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net period benefit cost in 2018 is $2.1 million.

The discount rate used in determining the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was 3.5% as of December 31, 2017 and 3.9% as of December 31, 2016. The discount rate used for the accumulated post-retirement obligation was derived using a blend of U.S. Treasury and high-quality corporate bond discount rates.

The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption was 6.0% for 2017 and 2016. The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption was developed considering forward looking capital market assumptions and historical return expectations for each asset class assuming the plans’ target asset allocation and full availability of invested assets.

Fund strategies seek to capitalize on inefficiencies identified across different asset classes or markets. Hedge fund strategy types include long-short, event-driven, multi-strategy, equity partnerships and distressed credit.

Plan assets were measured at fair value. Registered investment companies are public investment vehicles valued using the Net Asset Value (NAV) of shares held by the plan at year-end. Equity and fixed income funds are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets. Closely held funds held by the plan, which are only available through private offerings, do not have readily determinable fair

F-29


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

values. Estimates of fair value of these funds were determined using the information provided by the fund managers and it is generally based on the net asset value per share or its equivalent.

The following table detailssets forth the key assumptions usedplan assets at fair value in estimatingaccordance with the grant date fair values of stock option awards granted during 2014, 2013 and 2012 based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model:value hierarchy described in Note 10:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant dates established during

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

Awarded during

 

2014

 

2013

 

2013

 

2012

 

2012

 

2013

2009 (1)

2012

2009 (1)

Number of options

 

250,000 

 

 

75,000 

 

 

9,000 

 

 

150,000 

 

 

230,000 

 

 

50,000 

 

150,000 

 

 

15,000 

 

 

150,000 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.08 

%

 

1.72 

%

 

2.25 

 

 

1.46 

%

 

1.82 

 

 

1.64 

%

0.48 

%

 

1.12 

%

 

0.88 

%

Expected life of options (years)

 

6.5 

 

 

5.3 

 

 

7.0 

 

 

4.6 

 

 

5.6 

 

 

5.7 

 

3.6 

 

 

7.3 

 

 

4.4 

 

Expected volatility of underlying stock

 

50.97 

%

 

51.72 

%

 

50.68 

 

 

47.69 

%

 

51.86 

 

 

51.81 

%

51.00 

%

 

50.59 

%

 

53.89 

%

Expected quarterly dividends (per share)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 —

 

 

 —

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31, 2017

 

As of December 31, 2016



Fair Value Hierarchy

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

Cash and cash equivalents

$

2,390 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

2,390 

 

$

2,437 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

2,437 

Fixed income funds

 

18,031 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

18,031 

 

 

14,023 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

14,023 

Equity funds

 

20,372 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

20,372 

 

 

10,489 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,489 



$

40,793 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

40,793 

 

$

26,949 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

26,949 

Closely held funds(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,711 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,931 

Hedge fund investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,037 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,177 

Total closely held funds(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,748 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,108 

Total

$

40,793 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

71,541 

 

$

26,949 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

66,057 



______________

(1)(a)

During 2009,Closely held funds in private investment were measured at fair value using NAV and were not categorized in the Compensation Committee approvedfair value hierarchy. Although the awardinvestments were not categorized within the fair value hierarchy, the holdings of 750,000 stock options that vestthese private investment funds were comprised of a combination of Level 1, 2 and 3 investments, but were not categorized in five equal annual installments from 2010 to 2014 subject to the achievement of pre-tax income performance targets established byfair value hierarchy because they were measured at NAV using the Compensation Committee for fiscal years 2009 to 2013. The Compensation Committee has established the performance targets for fiscal years 2011, 2012 and 2013, and these tranches were deemed granted for accounting purposes.practical expedient under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”).

 

The plans have benefit obligations in excess of the fair value of each plan’s assets detailed as follows:

[11]



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31, 2017

 

As of December 31, 2016



 

 

 

Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit

 

 

 



Pension

 

Equalization

 

 

 

 

Pension

 

Equalization

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Plan

 

Plan

 

Total

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Total

Projected benefit obligation

$

102,806 

 

$

3,412 

 

$

106,218 

 

$

100,336 

 

$

3,345 

 

$

103,681 

Accumulated benefit obligation

$

102,806 

 

$

3,412 

 

$

106,218 

 

$

100,336 

 

$

3,345 

 

$

103,681 

Fair value of plans' assets

 

71,541 

 

 

 —

 

 

71,541 

 

 

66,057 

 

 

 —

 

 

66,057 

Projected benefit obligation greater than fair value of plans' assets

$

31,265 

 

$

3,412 

 

$

34,677 

 

$

34,279 

 

$

3,345 

 

$

37,624 

Accumulated benefit obligation greater than fair value of plans' assets

$

31,265 

 

$

3,412 

 

$

34,677 

 

$

34,279 

 

$

3,345 

 

$

37,624 

Section 401(k) Plan

The Company has a contributory Section 401(k) plan which covers its executive, professional, administrative and clerical employees, subject to certain specified service requirements. The cost recognized by the Company for its 401(k) plan was $4.2 million in 2017 and $4.0 million in both 2016 and 2015. The Company’s contribution is based on a non-discretionary match of employees’ contributions, as defined by the plan.

Multiemployer Plans

In addition to the Company’s defined benefit pension and contribution plans discussed above, the Company participates in multiemployer pension plans for its union construction employees. Contributions are based on the hours worked by employees covered under various collective bargaining agreements. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a contributor to a multiemployer plan is only liable for its proportionate share of a plan’s unfunded vested liability upon termination, or withdrawal from, a plan. The Company currently has no intention of withdrawing from any of the multiemployer pension plans in which it participates and, therefore, has not recognized a liability for its proportionate share of any unfunded vested liabilities associated with these plans.

F-30


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following table summarize key information for the plans that the Company had significant involvement with during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIP/RP 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of



 

 

 

Pension Protections Act

 

Status

 

Company Contributions

 

 

 

Collective



 

EIN/Pension

 

Zone Status

 

Pending Or

 

(amounts in millions)

 

Surcharge

 

Bargaining

Pension Fund

 

Plan Number

 

2017

 

2016

 

Implemented

 

2017 (b)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Imposed

 

Agreement

The Pension, Hospitalization and Benefit Plan of the Electrical Industry - Pension Trust Fund

 

13-6123601/001

 

Green

 

Green

 

N/A

 

$     16.0 

 

 

$     15.8 

(a)

 

$     13.6 

(a)

 

No

 

4/30/2019

Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California

 

94-6050970

 

Red

 

Red

 

Implemented

 

8.2 

 

 

4.4 

 

 

2.7 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2019

Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California

 

94-6277608

 

Yellow

 

Yellow

 

Implemented

 

6.6 

 

 

5.6 

 

 

2.8 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2019

Northern California Electrical Workers Pension Plan

 

94-6062674

 

Green

 

Green

 

N/A

 

5.2 

 

 

1.5 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

No

 

5/31/2018

Steamfitters Industry Pension Fund

 

13-6149680/001

 

Green

 

Green

 

N/A

 

3.9 

 

 

3.9 

(a)

 

6.2 

(a)

 

No

 

6/30/2020

(a)

These amounts exceeded 5% of the respective total plan contributions.

(b)

The Company's contributions as a percentage of total plan contributions were not available for any of its plans.

In addition to the individually significant plans described above, the Company also contributed approximately $32.1 million in 2017, $52.5 million in 2016 and $55.8 million in 2015 to other multiemployer pension plans.

10.     Fair Value Measurements

The fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820 prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation techniques into the following three levels:

     Level 1 inputs are observable quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

     Level 2 inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, but are not Level 1 inputs

     Level 3 inputs are unobservable

The following fair value hierarchy table presents the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31, 2017

 

As of December 31, 2016



Fair Value Hierarchy

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

Cash and cash equivalents(a)

 

$

192,868 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

192,868 

 

$

146,103 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

146,103 

Restricted cash(a)

 

 

4,780 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

4,780 

 

 

50,504 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

50,504 

Investments in lieu of retainage(b)

 

 

69,891 

 

 

2,405 

 

 

 —

 

 

72,296 

 

 

46,855 

 

 

4,411 

 

 

 —

 

 

51,266 

Total

 

$

267,539 

 

$

2,405 

 

$

 —

 

$

269,944 

 

$

243,462 

 

$

4,411 

 

$

 —

 

$

247,873 

(a)Includes money market funds with original maturity dates of three months or less.

(b)Investments in lieu of retainage are included in accounts receivable and are comprised of money market funds and municipal bonds, the majority of which are rated A3 or better. The fair values of the money market funds are measured using quoted market prices; therefore, they are classified as Level 1 assets. The fair values of municipal bonds are measured using readily available pricing sources for comparable instruments; therefore, they are classified as Level 2 assets. All of the above investments are available-for-sale securities.

The Company did not have material transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The carrying values of receivables, payables and other amounts arising out of normal contract activities, including retainage, which may be settled beyond one year, are estimated to approximate fair value. The Company’s restricted investments carried at amortized cost have an aggregate fair value of $52.5 million as of December 31, 2017, determined using Level 2 inputs. Of the Company’s long-term debt, the fair values of the 2017 Senior Notes as of December 31, 2017 was $537.5 million. The fair value of the 2010 Senior Notes as of December 31, 2016 was $302.6 million; the 2010 Senior Notes were redeemed in the second quarter of 2017, as discussed in Note 5. The fair value of the Convertible Notes was $222.2 million and $228.4 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The fair values of the 2017 Senior Notes, 2010 Senior Notes and Convertible Notes were determined using Level 1 inputs, specifically current observable market prices. The reported value of the Company’s remaining borrowings as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 approximates fair value.

F-31


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11.     Variable Interest Entities

From time to time the Company may form joint ventures with third parties for the execution of single contracts or projects. In accordance with ASC 810, the Company assesses its joint ventures at inception to determine if any meet the qualifications of a VIE. The Company considers a joint venture a VIE if either (a) the total equity investment is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) characteristics of a controlling financial interest are missing (either the ability to make decisions through voting or other rights, the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity), or (c) the voting rights of the equity holders are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity and/or their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. Upon the occurrence of certain events outlined in ASC 810, the company reassesses its initial determination of whether the joint venture is a VIE.

ASC 810 also requires the Company to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The Company concludes that it is the primary beneficiary and consolidates the VIE if the Company has both (a) the power to direct the economically significant activities of the VIE and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company considers the contractual agreements that define the ownership structure, distribution of profits and losses, risks, responsibilities, indebtedness, voting rights and board representation of the respective parties in determining if the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company also considers all parties that have direct or implicit variable interests when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary. In accordance with ASC 810, management’s assessment of whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE is performed continuously.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet included current and noncurrent assets of $95.5 million and $11.6 million, respectively, as well as current liabilities of $140.7 million related to the operations of its consolidated VIEs.

One large joint venture that the Company is consolidating was established to construct the Purple Line Segment 2 Extension project, a $1.4 billion mass-transit project in Los Angeles, California. The Company has a 75% interest in the joint venture with the remaining 25% held by O&G Industries, Inc. The joint venture was initially financed with contributions from the partners and, per the terms of the joint venture agreement, the partners may be required to provide additional capital contributions in the future.

12.     Business Segments

The Company offers general contracting, pre-construction planning and comprehensive project management services, including planning and scheduling of manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for the timely completion of a project in accordance with the terms and specifications contained in a construction contract. The Company also offers self-performed construction services: site work; concrete forming and placement; steel erection; electrical; mechanical; plumbing; and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC). As described below, the Company’s business is conducted through three segments: Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors. These segments are determined based on how the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (chief operating decision maker) aggregates business units when evaluating performance and allocating resources.

The Civil segment specializes in public works construction and the replacement and reconstruction of infrastructure. The civil contracting services include construction and rehabilitation of highways, bridges, tunnels, mass-transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities.

The Building segment has significant experience providing services for private and public works customers in a number of specialized building markets, including: high-rise residential, hospitality and gaming, transportation, health care, commercial and government offices, sports and entertainment, education, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical, industrial and high-tech.

The Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems and pneumatically placed concrete for a full range of Civil and Building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass-transit end markets. This segment provides the Company with unique strengths and capabilities that allow the Company to position itself as a full-service contractor with greater control over scheduled work, project delivery and risk management.

F-32


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following tables set forth certain reportable segment information relating to the Company’s operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:  



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Reportable Segments

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Specialty

 

Segment

 

 

 

Consolidated

(in thousands)

Civil

 

Building

 

Contractors

 

Total

 

Corporate

 

Total

Year ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

$

1,856,164 

 

$

1,982,857 

 

$

1,213,708 

 

$

5,052,729 

 

$

 —

 

$

5,052,729 

Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(253,989)

 

 

(41,532)

 

 

 —

 

 

(295,521)

 

 

 —

 

 

(295,521)

Revenue from external customers

$

1,602,175 

 

$

1,941,325 

 

$

1,213,708 

 

$

4,757,208 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,757,208 

Income from construction operations

$

192,207 

 

$

34,199 

 

$

18,938 

 

$

245,344 

 

$

(65,867)

(a)

$

179,477 

Capital expenditures

$

27,694 

 

$

267 

 

$

721 

 

$

28,682 

 

$

1,598 

 

$

30,280 

Depreciation and amortization(b)

$

33,767 

 

$

2,021 

 

$

4,699 

 

$

40,487 

 

$

11,443 

 

$

51,930 

Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

$

1,830,857 

 

$

2,146,747 

 

$

1,234,272 

 

$

5,211,876 

 

$

 —

 

$

5,211,876 

Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(161,894)

 

 

(76,906)

 

 

 —

 

 

(238,800)

 

 

 —

 

 

(238,800)

Revenue from external customers

$

1,668,963 

 

$

2,069,841 

 

$

1,234,272 

 

$

4,973,076 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,973,076 

Income from construction operations

$

172,668 

 

$

51,564 

 

$

37,908 

 

$

262,140 

 

$

(60,220)

(a)

$

201,920 

Capital expenditures

$

13,541 

 

$

516 

 

$

1,005 

 

$

15,062 

 

$

681 

 

$

15,743 

Depreciation and amortization(b)

$

48,561 

 

$

2,186 

 

$

5,035 

 

$

55,782 

 

$

11,520 

 

$

67,302 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

$

2,005,193 

 

$

1,900,492 

 

$

1,228,030 

 

$

5,133,715 

 

$

 —

 

$

5,133,715 

Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(115,286)

 

 

(97,957)

 

 

 —

 

 

(213,243)

 

 

 —

 

 

(213,243)

Revenue from external customers

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,802,535 

 

$

1,228,030 

 

$

4,920,472 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,920,472 

Income from construction operations

$

145,213 

 

$

(1,240)

 

$

15,682 

 

$

159,655 

 

$

(54,242)

(a)

$

105,413 

Capital expenditures

$

8,383 

 

$

2,877 

 

$

1,193 

 

$

12,453 

 

$

23,459 

 

$

35,912 

Depreciation and amortization(b)

$

22,601 

 

$

2,728 

 

$

5,507 

 

$

30,836 

 

$

10,798 

 

$

41,634 

(a)

Consists primarily of corporate general and administrative expenses.

(b)

Depreciation and amortization is included in income from construction operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recorded net favorable adjustments totaling $3.0 million in income from construction operations ($0.04 per diluted share) for various Five Star Electric projects in New York in the Specialty Contractors segment. The net impact included material adjustments related to two electrical subcontract projects: a favorable adjustment of $14.0 million for a completed project ($0.17 per diluted share) and an unfavorable adjustment of $13.8 million for a project that was nearly complete ($0.16 per diluted share).

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded unfavorable adjustments in the Specialty Contractors segment totaling $45.6 million in income from construction operations ($0.53 per diluted share) related to various Five Star Electric projects in New York, none of which were individually material. Most of these projects are complete or nearing completion. In addition, there were unfavorable adjustments to the estimated cost to complete a Building segment project, which has been completed and resulted in a decrease of $24.3 million in income from construction operations ($0.28 per diluted share). Furthermore, the Company recorded an unfavorable adjustment totaling $23.9 million ($0.28 per diluted share) in the Civil segment for an adverse legal decision related to a long-standing litigation matter, for which the Company assumed liability as part of an acquisition in 2011. Finally, the Company recorded favorable adjustments for a Civil segment runway reconstruction project, which resulted in an increase of $13.7 million in income from construction operations ($0.16 per diluted share).

The above were the only changes in estimates considered material to the Company’s results of operations during the periods presented herein.

F-33


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Total assets by segment are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Civil

$

2,452,108 

 

$

2,152,123 

Building

 

909,207 

 

 

917,317 

Specialty Contractors

 

767,807 

 

 

813,851 

Corporate and other(a)

 

135,001 

 

 

155,329 

Total assets

$

4,264,123 

 

$

4,038,620 

(a) Consists principally of cash, equipment, tax-related assets and insurance-related assets, offset by the elimination of assets related to intersegment revenue.

Geographic Information

Information concerning principal geographic areas is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

$

4,613,644 

 

$

4,802,393 

 

$

4,694,165 

Foreign and U.S. territories

 

143,564 

 

 

170,683 

 

 

226,307 

Total revenue

$

4,757,208 

 

$

4,973,076 

 

$

4,920,472 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

United States

$

4,093,673 

 

$

3,911,865 

Foreign and U.S. territories

 

170,450 

 

 

126,755 

Total assets

$

4,264,123 

 

$

4,038,620 

Reconciliation of Segment Information to Consolidated Amounts

A reconciliation of segment results to the consolidated income before income taxes is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Income from construction operations

$

179,477 

 

$

201,920 

 

$

105,413 

Other income, net

 

43,882 

 

 

6,977 

 

 

13,569 

Interest expense

 

(69,384)

 

 

(59,782)

 

 

(45,143)

Income before income taxes

$

153,975 

 

$

149,115 

 

$

73,839 

F-34


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13.     Related Party Transactions

The Company leases, at market rates, certain facilities from an entity owned by Ronald N. Tutor, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Under these leases, the Company paid $2.8 million in both 2017 and 2016, and $2.7 million for 2015, and recognized expense of $3.2 million in each of those same years.

Raymond R. Oneglia, Vice Chairman of O&G Industries, Inc. (“O&G”), is a director of the Company. The Company occasionally forms construction project joint ventures with O&G, in which each partner may provide services and equipment to these joint ventures on customary trade terms. During the three years ended December 31, 2017, the Company had three active joint ventures with O&G including two infrastructure projects in the northeastern United States that are both complete, and one for a project in Los Angeles, California in which the Company’s and O&G’s joint venture interests are 75% and 25%, respectively. Payments made by these joint ventures to O&G for services and equipment during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were immaterial.

Peter Arkley, Senior Managing Director, Construction Services Group, of Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. (“Alliant”), is a director of the Company. The Company uses Alliant for various insurance-related services. The associated expenses for services provided for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $17.6 million, $8.9 million and $9.8 million, respectively. The Company owed Alliant $0.5 million and $5.2 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for services rendered.

14.     Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data



The following table presents selected unaudited quarterly financial data for each full quarterly period of 20142017 and 2013:2016:



(in thousands, except per share amounts)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

Revenue

 

$

1,117,361 

 

$

1,247,274 

 

$

1,199,505 

 

$

1,193,068 

Gross profit

 

 

102,720 

 

 

102,838 

 

 

118,251 

 

 

130,596 

Income from construction operations

 

 

37,017 

 

 

34,045 

 

 

49,072 

 

 

59,343 

Income before income taxes

 

 

21,870 

 

 

52,516 

 

 

34,396 

 

 

45,193 

Net income

 

 

13,764 

 

 

32,633 

 

 

25,300 

 

 

82,847 

Net income attributable to Tutor Perini Corporation

 

 

13,764 

 

 

30,096 

 

 

23,584 

 

 

80,938 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.28 

 

$

0.61 

 

$

0.47 

 

$

1.63 

Diluted

 

$

0.27 

 

$

0.59 

 

$

0.47 

 

$

1.60 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

Revenues

 

$

955,233 

 

$

1,084,510 

 

 

$

1,250,689 

 

$

1,201,877 

Gross profit

 

$

105,347 

 

$

129,531 

 

 

$

140,841 

 

$

129,723 

Income from construction operations

 

$

41,497 

 

$

65,443 

 

 

$

70,354 

 

$

64,396 

Income before income taxes

 

$

27,293 

 

$

47,612 

 

 

$

58,616 

 

$

53,917 

Net income

 

$

15,939 

 

$

28,545 

 

 

$

35,730 

 

$

27,722 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.33 

 

$

0.59 

 

 

$

0.74 

 

$

0.57 

Diluted

 

$

0.33 

 

$

0.58 

 

 

$

0.73 

 

$

0.56 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

Revenues

 

$

992,928 

 

$

1,053,065 

 

 

$

1,030,388 

 

$

1,099,291 

Gross profit

 

$

100,357 

 

$

105,955 

 

 

$

120,857 

 

$

139,735 

Income from construction operations

 

$

36,079 

 

$

39,474 

(a)

 

$

58,094 

 

$

70,175 

Income before income taxes

 

$

23,916 

 

$

25,157 

 

 

$

37,035 

 

$

53,507 

Net income

 

$

14,800 

 

$

15,478 

 

 

$

23,759 

 

$

33,259 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.31 

 

$

0.32 

 

 

$

0.50 

 

$

0.69 

Diluted

 

$

0.31 

 

$

0.32 

 

 

$

0.49 

 

$

0.68 

89


Table of Contents

[12] Business Segments

The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer who decides how to allocate resources and assess performance of the business segments. Generally, the Company evaluates performance of its operating segments on the basis of income from operations and cash flow.

During the first quarter of 2014, the Company completed a reorganization which resulted in the elimination of the Management Services reporting unit and reportable segment. The Management Services reporting unit formerly consisted of the following subsidiary companies: Black Construction and Perini Management Services. The reorganization was completed due to the unit no longer meeting the criteria set forth in FASB ASC Topic 280,  “Segment Reporting”

The following tables set forth certain reportable segment information relating to the Company’s operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. In accordance with the accounting guidance on segment reporting, the Company has restated comparative prior period information for the reorganized reportable segments in the tables below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reportable Segments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

(in thousands)

 

Civil

 

Building

 

Contractors

 

Totals

 

Corporate

 

Total

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenues

 

$

1,730,468 

 

$

1,558,431 

 

$

1,301,328 

 

$

4,590,227 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

4,590,227 

Elimination of intersegment revenues

 

 

(43,324)

 

 

(54,594)

 

 

 —

 

 

(97,918)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

(97,918)

Revenues from external customers

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,503,837 

 

$

1,301,328 

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

4,492,309 

Income from construction operations

 

$

220,554 

 

$

24,697 

 

$

50,998 

 

$

296,249 

 

$

(54,559)

 

 

$

241,690 

Assets

 

$

1,814,170 

 

$

680,933 

 

$

775,162 

 

$

3,270,265 

 

$

503,050 

(b)

 

$

3,773,315 

Capital Expenditures

 

$

65,377 

 

$

735 

 

$

6,974 

 

$

73,086 

 

$

1,927 

 

 

$

75,013 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenues

 

$

1,519,370 

 

$

1,622,705 

 

$

1,182,844 

 

$

4,324,919 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

4,324,919 

Elimination of intersegment revenues

 

 

(77,954)

 

 

(70,726)

 

 

(567)

 

 

(149,247)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

(149,247)

Revenues from external customers

 

$

1,441,416 

 

$

1,551,979 

 

$

1,182,277 

 

$

4,175,672 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

4,175,672 

Income from construction operations

 

 

177,667 

 

$

24,579 

 

$

49,008 

 

$

251,254 

 

$

(47,432)

 

 

$

203,822 

Assets

 

$

1,427,633 

 

$

666,375 

 

$

727,303 

 

$

2,821,311 

 

$

576,127 

(b)

 

$

3,397,438 

Capital Expenditures

 

 

32,489 

 

$

1,666 

 

$

4,137 

 

$

38,292 

 

$

6,999 

 

 

$

45,291 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenues

 

$

1,378,322 

 

$

1,632,279 

 

$

1,183,518 

 

$

4,194,119 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

4,194,119 

Elimination of intersegment revenues

 

 

(42,329)

 

 

(39,838)

 

 

(481)

 

 

(82,648)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

(82,648)

Revenues from external customers

 

$

1,335,993 

 

$

1,592,441 

 

$

1,183,037 

 

$

4,111,471 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

4,111,471 

(Loss) Income from construction operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before impairment charge

 

$

118,637 

 

$

2,140 

 

$

79,080 

 

$

199,857 

 

$

(45,094)

(a)

 

$

154,763 

Impairment charge

 

 

(81,341)

 

 

(283,744)

 

 

(11,489)

 

 

(376,574)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

(376,574)

Total

 

$

37,296 

 

$

(281,604)

 

$

67,591 

 

$

(176,717)

 

$

(45,094)

 

 

$

(221,811)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

$

1,214,805 

 

$

681,832 

 

$

672,074 

 

$

2,568,711 

 

$

727,699 

(b)

 

$

3,296,410 

Capital Expenditures

 

$

28,828 

 

$

1,682 

 

$

10,201 

 

$

40,711 

 

$

2,691 

 

 

$

43,402 

______________

(a)

Primarily consist of corporate general and administrative expenses.

(b)

Principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, corporate transportation equipment, construction equipment, and other investments available for general corporate purposes.

90


Table of Contents

Information concerning principal geographic areas is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(in thousands)

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

4,323,471 

 

$

4,000,380 

 

$

3,925,733 

Foreign and U.S. Territories

 

 

168,838 

 

 

175,292 

 

 

185,738 

Total

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

4,175,672 

 

$

4,111,471 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from construction operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

268,566 

 

$

238,989 

 

$

(195,457)

Foreign and U.S. Territories

 

 

27,683 

 

 

12,265 

 

 

18,740 

Corporate

 

 

(54,559)

 

 

(47,432)

 

 

(45,094)

Total

 

$

241,690 

 

$

203,822 

 

$

(221,811)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

(in thousands)

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

3,612,997 

 

$

3,182,706 

 

$

3,107,808 

Foreign and U.S. Territories

 

 

160,318 

 

 

214,732 

 

 

188,602 

Total

 

$

3,773,315 

 

$

3,397,438 

 

$

3,296,410 

Income from construction operations has been allocated geographically based on the location of the job site.

[13] Related Party Transactions

The Company leases certain facilities from Ronald N. Tutor, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and an affiliate owned by Mr. Tutor under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. On April 18, 2014, the Company and Ronald N. Tutor entered into two separate lease agreements, replacing the former leases which terminated on May 31, 2014. Each of the new leases is effective June 1, 2014 with new monthly payments of an aggregate of $0.2 million, and an increase at the rate of the greater of 3% per annum or the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for the Los Angeles metropolitan area beginning on June 1, 2015. Both new leases provide for purchase/sell options beginning on June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2025, respectively. Also under both leases, the fair market value shall be agreed upon by both parties, or shall be determined by a consensus of independent qualified appraisers. Lease expense for these new leases and the former leases until date of termination, recorded on a straight-line basis, was $2.5 million for both the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and $2.3 million for the year ended 2012.

Raymond R. Oneglia, who is the Vice Chairman of O&G Industries, Inc. (“O&G”), is a director of the Company. Currently the Company has a 30% interest in a joint venture with O&G as the sponsor involving a highway construction project for the State of Connecticut, with an estimated total contract value of approximately $362 million, scheduled for completion in 2016. Under this arrangement, O&G provides project-related equipment and services directly to the customer (on customary trade terms). In accordance with the joint venture agreement, payments to O&G for equipment and services for each of the years ended December 31, 2014,  December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $7.0 million,  $6.9 million, and $6.3 million, respectively. O&G’s cumulative holdings of the Company’s stock as of December 31, 2014 were 500,000 shares and December 31, 2013 were 600,000 shares, or 1.03% and 1.24%, respectively, of total common shares outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The Company had periodically utilized flight services from JF Aviation, LLC. James A. Frost is the Owner of JF Aviation, LLC and serves as President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company’s Civil segment. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the transaction amounted to approximately $0.4 million. The Company did not utilize the services of JF Aviation in 2013 or 2014.

91


Table of Contents

[14] Separate Financial Information of Subsidiary Guarantors of Indebtedness

As discussed in Note 4 — Financial Commitments, the Company’s obligation to pay principal and interest on its 7.625% senior unsecured notes due November 1, 2018, is guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries that guarantee obligations under the Company’s Amended Credit Agreement (the “Guarantors”). The guarantees are full and unconditional and the Guarantors are 100%-owned by the Company.

The following supplemental condensed consolidating financial information reflects the summarized financial information of the Company as the issuer of the senior unsecured notes, the Guarantors and the Company’s non- guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis.

92


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET - DECEMBER 31, 2014

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

$

75,087 

 

$

36,764 

 

$

23,732 

 

$

 —

 

$

135,583 

 

Restricted Cash

 

 

3,369 

 

 

5,274 

 

 

35,727 

 

 

 —

 

 

44,370 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

 

299,427 

 

 

1,246,635 

 

 

37,064 

 

 

(103,622)

 

 

1,479,504 

 

Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings

 

 

70,344 

 

 

700,362 

 

 

152 

 

 

(44,456)

 

 

726,402 

 

Deferred Income Taxes

 

 

 —

 

 

15,639 

 

 

 —

 

 

2,323 

 

 

17,962 

 

Other Current Assets

 

 

39,196 

 

 

42,750 

 

 

24,397 

 

 

(37,608)

 

 

68,735 

 

Total Current Assets

 

 

487,423 

 

 

2,047,424 

 

 

121,072 

 

 

(183,363)

 

 

2,472,556 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term Investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Property and Equipment, net

 

 

92,413 

 

 

430,876 

 

 

4,313 

 

 

 —

 

 

527,602 

 

Intercompany Notes and Receivables

 

 

 —

 

 

122,401 

 

 

 —

 

 

(122,401)

 

 

 —

 

Other Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Goodwill

 

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

 

   Intangible Assets, net

 

 

 —

 

 

100,254 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

100,254 

 

   Investment in Subsidiaries

 

 

2,154,562 

 

 

19,519 

 

 

50 

 

 

(2,174,131)

 

 

 —

 

   Other

 

 

83,503 

 

 

9,847 

 

 

 —

 

 

(5,453)

 

 

87,897 

 

 

 

$

2,817,901 

 

$

3,315,327 

 

$

125,435 

 

$

(2,485,348)

 

$

3,773,315 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Maturities of Long-term Debt

 

$

34,776 

 

$

46,516 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

81,292 

 

Accounts Payable

 

 

186,958 

 

 

716,851 

 

 

3,749 

 

 

(109,384)

 

 

798,174 

 

Billings in Excess of Costs and Estimated Earnings

 

 

139,020 

 

 

185,807 

 

 

2,672 

 

 

(8,203)

 

 

319,296 

 

Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

 

 

33,018 

 

 

95,177 

 

 

58,571 

 

 

(26,952)

 

 

159,814 

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

 

393,772 

 

 

1,044,351 

 

 

64,992 

 

 

(144,539)

 

 

1,358,576 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term Debt, less current maturities

 

 

712,460 

 

 

112,060 

 

 

 —

 

 

(40,453)

 

 

784,067 

 

Deferred Income Taxes

 

 

142,457 

 

 

7,914 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

150,371 

 

Other Long-term Liabilities

 

 

112,899 

 

 

1,897 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

114,796 

 

Intercompany Notes and Advances Payable

 

 

90,373 

 

 

 —

 

 

35,619 

 

 

(125,992)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Contingencies and Commitments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

1,365,939 

 

 

2,149,105 

 

 

24,824 

 

 

(2,174,363)

 

 

1,365,505 

 

 

 

$

2,817,900 

 

$

3,315,327 

 

$

125,435 

 

$

(2,485,347)

 

$

3,773,315 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

93


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET - DECEMBER 31, 2013

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

$

88,995 

 

$

18,031 

 

$

12,897 

 

$

 —

 

$

119,923 

 

Restricted Cash

 

 

18,833 

 

 

8,040 

 

 

15,721 

 

 

 —

 

 

42,594 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

 

208,227 

 

 

1,126,012 

 

 

47,958 

 

 

(90,951)

 

 

1,291,246 

 

Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings

 

 

99,779 

 

 

505,979 

 

 

152 

 

 

(32,662)

 

 

573,248 

 

Deferred Income Taxes

 

 

 —

 

 

15,866 

 

 

 —

 

 

(7,626)

 

 

8,240 

 

Other Current Assets

 

 

37,605 

 

 

26,234 

 

 

24,462 

 

 

(37,632)

 

 

50,669 

 

Total Current Assets

 

 

453,439 

 

 

1,700,162 

 

 

101,190 

 

 

(168,871)

 

 

2,085,920 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term Investments

 

 

46,283 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

46,283 

 

Property and Equipment, net

 

 

77,562 

 

 

415,993 

 

 

4,570 

 

 

 —

 

 

498,125 

 

Intercompany Notes and Receivables

 

 

 —

 

 

428,190 

 

 

 —

 

 

(428,190)

 

 

 —

 

Other Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Goodwill

 

 

 —

 

 

577,756 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

577,756 

 

   Intangible Assets, net

 

 

 —

 

 

113,740 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

113,740 

 

   Investment in Subsidiaries

 

 

2,181,280 

 

 

29 

 

 

50 

 

 

(2,181,359)

 

 

 —

 

   Other

 

 

70,269 

 

 

10,528 

 

 

 —

 

 

(5,183)

 

 

75,614 

 

 

 

$

2,828,833 

 

$

3,246,398 

 

$

105,810 

 

$

(2,783,603)

 

$

3,397,438 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Maturities of Long-term Debt

 

 

50,578 

 

 

64,080 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

114,658 

 

Accounts Payable

 

 

162,292 

 

 

677,997 

 

 

6,039 

 

 

(88,103)

 

 

758,225 

 

Billings in Excess of Costs and Estimated Earnings

 

 

90,267 

 

 

177,285 

 

 

34 

 

 

 —

 

 

267,586 

 

Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

 

 

58,232 

 

 

99,257 

 

 

48,369 

 

 

(47,841)

 

 

158,017 

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

 

361,369 

 

 

1,018,619 

 

 

54,442 

 

 

(135,944)

 

 

1,298,486 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term Debt, less current maturities

 

 

575,356 

 

 

84,053 

 

 

 —

 

 

(40,183)

 

 

619,226 

 

Deferred Income Taxes

 

 

107,448 

 

 

6,885 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

114,333 

 

Other Long-term Liabilities

 

 

114,677 

 

 

3,181 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

117,858 

 

Intercompany Notes and Advances Payable

 

 

422,448 

 

 

 —

 

 

23,462 

 

 

(445,910)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingencies and Commitments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

1,247,535 

 

 

2,133,660 

 

 

27,906 

 

 

(2,161,566)

 

 

1,247,535 

 

 

 

$

2,828,833 

 

$

3,246,398 

 

$

105,810 

 

$

(2,783,603)

 

$

3,397,438 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

94


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Revenues

 

$

959,010 

 

$

3,690,075 

 

$

 —

 

$

(156,776)

 

$

4,492,309 

Cost of operations

 

 

808,285 

 

 

3,353,098 

 

 

(17,740)

 

 

(156,776)

 

 

3,986,867 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

150,725 

 

 

336,977 

 -

 

17,740 

 -

 

 —

 -

 

505,442 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

80,151 

 

 

181,714 

 

 

1,887 

 

 

 —

 

 

263,752 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

 

 

70,574 

 

 

155,263 

 

 

15,853 

 

 

 —

 

 

241,690 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

 

95,501 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(95,501)

 

 

 —

Other income (expense), net

 

 

(8,322)

 

 

(1,705)

 

 

491 

 

 

 —

 

 

(9,536)

Interest expense

 

 

(40,658)

 

 

(4,058)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(44,716)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

117,095 

 

 

149,500 

 -

 

16,344 

 -

 

(95,501)

 -

 

187,438 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for Income Taxes

 

 

(9,159)

 

 

(63,411)

 

 

(6,932)

 

 

 —

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

107,936 

 

$

86,089 

 -

$

9,412 

 -

$

(95,501)

 -

$

107,936 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income of Subsidiaries

 

 

(433)

 

 

 —

 -

 

 —

 

 

433 

 

 

 —

Change in pension benefit plans assets/liabilities

 

 

(8,155)

 

 

 —

 -

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(8,155)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 —

 

 

(637)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(637)

Change in fair value of investments

 

 

 —

 

 

204 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

204 

Change in fair value of interest rate swap

 

 

348 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

348 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(8,240)

 

 

(433)

 

 

 —

 

 

433 

 

 

(8,240)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

$

99,696 

 

$

85,656 

 

$

9,412 

 

$

(95,068)

 

$

99,696 

95


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

680,440 

 

$

3,315,608 

 

$

 —

 

$

179,624 

 

$

4,175,672 

Cost of operations

 

 

590,675 

 

 

2,960,569 

 

 

(22,100)

 

 

179,624 

 

 

3,708,768 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

89,765 

 

 

355,039 

 -

 

22,100 

 -

 

 —

 -

 

466,904 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

77,507 

 

 

183,723 

 

 

1,852 

 

 

 —

 

 

263,082 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

 

 

12,258 

 

 

171,316 

 

 

20,248 

 

 

 —

 

 

203,822 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

 

122,875 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(122,875)

 

 

 —

Other income (expense), net

 

 

(27,162)

 

 

8,075 

 

 

512 

 

 

 —

 

 

(18,575)

Interest expense

 

 

(41,987)

 

 

(3,645)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(45,632)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

65,984 

 

 

175,746 

 -

 

20,760 

 -

 

(122,875)

 -

 

139,615 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for Income Taxes

 

 

21,312 

 

 

(65,852)

 

 

(7,779)

 

 

 —

 

 

(52,319)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

87,296 

 

$

109,894 

 -

$

12,981 

 -

$

(122,875)

 -

$

87,296 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income of subsidiaries

 

 

(1,293)

 

 

 —

 -

 

 —

 

 

1,293 

 

 

 —

 Change in pension benefit plans assets/liabilities

 

 

10,910 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,910 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 —

 

 

(738)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(738)

Change in fair value of investments

 

 

 —

 

 

(555)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(555)

Change in fair value of interest rate swap

 

 

578 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

578 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

10,195 

 

 

(1,293)

 

 

 —

 

 

1,293 

 

 

10,195 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

$

97,491 

 

$

108,601 

 

$

12,981 

 

$

(121,582)

 

$

97,491 

96


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

429,926 

 

$

3,769,814 

 

$

 —

 

$

(88,269)

 

$

4,111,471 

Cost of operations

 

 

375,914 

 

 

3,421,877 

 

 

(13,183)

 

 

(88,269)

 

 

3,696,339 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

54,012 

 

 

347,937 

 -

 

13,183 

 -

 

 —

 -

 

415,132 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

71,983 

 

 

186,831 

 

 

1,555 

 

 

 —

 

 

260,369 

Goodwill and intangible assets impairment

 

 

 —

 

 

376,574 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

376,574 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

 

 

(17,971)

 

 

(215,468)

 -

 

11,628 

 -

 

 —

 -

 

(221,811)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

 

(225,100)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

225,100 

 

 

 —

Other income (expense), net

 

 

(2,603)

 

 

382 

 

 

364 

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,857)

Interest expense

 

 

(40,067)

 

 

(4,107)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(44,174)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

(285,741)

 

 

(219,193)

 -

 

11,992 

 -

 

225,100 

 -

 

(267,842)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for Income Taxes

 

 

20,341 

 

 

(13,155)

 

 

(4,744)

 

 

 —

 

 

2,442 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

(265,400)

 

$

(232,348)

 -

$

7,248 

 -

$

225,100 

 -

$

(265,400)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income of subsidiaries

 

 

620 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(620)

 

 

 —

Tax adjustment on minimum pension liability

 

 

(1,610)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,610)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 —

 

 

382 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

382 

Change in fair value of investments

 

 

 —

 

 

238 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

238 

 Change in fair value of interest rate swap

 

 

(974)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(974)

 Realized loss on sale of investments recorded in net income (loss)

 

 

2,005 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,005 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

41 

 

 

620 

 

 

 —

 

 

(620)

 

 

41 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

$

(265,359)

 

$

(231,728)

 

$

7,248 

 

$

224,480 

 

$

(265,359)

97


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

107,936 

 

$

86,089 

 

$

9,412 

 

$

(95,501)

 

$

107,936 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

4,592 

 

 

51,109 

 

 

271 

 

 

 —

 

 

55,972 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

 

(95,501)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

95,501 

 

 

 —

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

19,256 

 

 

(641)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

18,615 

 

Excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 

 

(787)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(787)

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

39,186 

 

 

(17,726)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

21,460 

 

(Gain) loss on sale of investments

 

 

1,786 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,786 

 

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment

 

 

833 

 

 

(32)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

801 

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

20,221 

 

 

(17,147)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,074 

 

Other non-cash items

 

 

(7,029)

 

 

10,302 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,273 

 

Changes in other components of working capital 

 

 

(26,100)

 

 

(264,203)

 

 

21,495 

 

 

 —

 

 

(268,808)

 

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED  BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

$

64,393 

 

$

(152,249)

 

$

31,178 

 

$

 —

 

$

(56,678)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment excluding financed purchases

 

 

(17,626)

 

 

(57,387)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(75,013)

 

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

 

(784)

 

 

6,119 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

5,335 

 

Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities

 

 

44,497 

 

 

(0)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

44,497 

 

Change in restricted cash

 

 

15,464 

 

 

2,766 

 

 

(20,006)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,776)

 

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

$

41,551 

 

$

(48,502)

 

$

(20,006)

 

$

 —

 

$

(26,957)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt

 

 

1,078,932 

 

 

77,807 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,156,739 

 

Repayment of debt

 

 

(957,830)

 

 

(68,519)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,026,349)

 

Business acquisition-related payments

 

 

(26,430)

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(26,430)

 

Excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 

 

787 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

787 

 

Issuance of common stock and effect of cashless exercise

 

 

(1,772)

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,771)

 

Debt Issuance Costs

 

 

(3,681)

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,681)

 

Increase (decrease) in intercompany advances

 

 

(209,858)

 

 

210,195 

 

 

(337)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

$

(119,852)

 

$

219,484 

 

$

(337)

 

$

 —

 

$

99,295 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 

(13,908)

 

 

18,733 

 

 

10,835 

 

 

 —

 

 

15,660 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year

 

 

88,995 

 

 

18,031 

 

 

12,897 

 

 

 —

 

 

119,923 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

 

$

75,087 

 

$

36,764 

 

$

23,732 

 

$

 —

 

$

135,583 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

98


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

87,296 

 

$

109,894 

 

$

12,981 

 

$

(122,875)

 

$

87,296 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

10,893 

 

 

48,246 

 

 

271 

 

 

 —

 

 

59,410 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

 

(122,875)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

122,875 

 

 

 —

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

6,623 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

6,623 

 

Excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 

 

(1,148)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,148)

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

921 

 

 

8,088 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,009 

 

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment

 

 

 —

 

 

49 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

49 

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

24,359 

 

 

(1,252)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

23,107 

 

Other non-cash items

 

 

(4,341)

 

 

622 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,719)

 

Changes in other components of working capital 

 

 

72,359 

 

 

(184,543)

 

 

(17,715)

 

 

 —

 

 

(129,899)

 

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

$

74,087 

 

$

(18,896)

 

$

(4,463)

 

$

 —

 

$

50,728 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment excluding financed purchases

 

 

(21,267)

 

 

(21,093)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(42,360)

 

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

 

 

 

2,657 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,663 

 

Change in restricted cash

 

 

11,403 

 

 

441 

 

 

(15,721)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,877)

 

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

$

(9,858)

 

$

(17,995)

 

$

(15,721)

 

$

 —

 

$

(43,574)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt

 

 

627,520 

 

 

25,760 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

653,280 

 

Repayment of debt

 

 

(647,795)

 

 

(29,000)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(676,795)

 

Business acquisition related payments

 

 

(31,038)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(31,038)

 

Excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 

 

1,148 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,148 

 

Issuance of common stock and effect of cashless exercise

 

 

(1,882)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,882)

 

Increase (decrease) in intercompany advances

 

 

12,150 

 

 

(16,223)

 

 

4,073 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

$

(39,897)

 

$

(19,463)

 

$

4,073 

 

$

 —

 

$

(55,287)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 

24,332 

 

 

(56,354)

 

 

(16,111)

 

 

 —

 

 

(48,133)

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year

 

 

64,663 

 

 

74,385 

 

 

29,008 

 

 

 —

 

 

168,056 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

 

$

88,995 

 

$

18,031 

 

$

12,897 

 

$

 —

 

$

119,923 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(265,400)

 

$

(232,348)

 

$

7,248 

 

$

225,100 

 

$

(265,400)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill and intangible assets impairment

 

 

 —

 

 

376,574 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

376,574 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

5,373 

 

 

55,812 

 

 

272 

 

 

 —

 

 

61,457 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

 

225,100 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(225,100)

 

 

 —

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

9,470 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,470 

 

Adjustment of interest rate swap to fair value

 

 

264 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

264 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(20,220)

 

 

(5,386)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(25,606)

 

Loss on sale of investments

 

 

2,699 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,699 

 

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment

 

 

 —

 

 

316 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

316 

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

(2,518)

 

 

(2,586)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(5,104)

 

Other non-cash items

 

 

(228)

 

 

376 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

148 

 

Changes in other components of working capital 

 

 

25,251 

 

 

(268,525)

 

 

20,593 

 

 

 —

 

 

(222,681)

 

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

$

(20,209)

 

$

(75,767)

 

$

28,113 

 

$

 —

 

$

(67,863)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment excluding financed purchases

 

 

(15,041)

 

 

(26,311)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(41,352)

 

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

 

364 

 

 

11,395 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,759 

 

Investments in available-for-sale securities

 

 

 —

 

 

(535)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(535)

 

Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities

 

 

16,553 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

16,553 

 

Change in restricted cash

 

 

(3,251)

 

 

(29)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,280)

 

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

$

(1,375)

 

$

(15,480)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

(16,855)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt

 

 

688,425 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

688,425 

 

Repayment of debt

 

 

(601,282)

 

 

(24,840)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(626,122)

 

Business acquisition related payments

 

 

(11,462)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(11,462)

 

Issuance of common stock and effect of cashless exercise

 

 

(308)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(308)

 

Debt issuance costs

 

 

(1,999)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,999)

 

Increase (decrease) in intercompany advances

 

 

(122,063)

 

 

137,980 

 

 

(15,917)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

$

(48,689)

 

$

113,140 

 

$

(15,917)

 

$

 —

 

$

48,534 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 

(70,273)

 

 

21,893 

 

 

12,196 

 

 

 —

 

 

(36,184)

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year

 

 

134,936 

 

 

52,492 

 

 

16,812 

 

 

 —

 

 

204,240 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

 

$

64,663 

 

$

74,385 

 

$

29,008 

 

$

 —

 

$

168,056 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

Revenue

 

$

1,085,369 

 

$

1,308,130 

 

$

1,332,978 

 

$

1,246,599 

Gross profit

 

 

105,092 

 

 

109,770 

 

 

124,668 

 

 

117,660 

Income from construction operations

 

 

40,122 

 

 

48,829 

 

 

60,919 

 

 

52,050 

Income before income taxes

 

 

26,724 

 

 

35,780 

 

 

47,926 

 

 

38,685 

Net income

 

 

15,400 

 

 

21,361 

 

 

28,801 

 

 

30,260 

Net income attributable to Tutor Perini Corporation

 

 

15,400 

 

 

21,361 

 

 

28,801 

 

 

30,260 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.31 

 

$

0.43 

 

$

0.59 

 

$

0.62 

Diluted

 

$

0.31 

 

$

0.43 

 

$

0.57 

 

$

0.60 





  





100


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Tutor Perini Corporation

Sylmar, California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tutor Perini Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tutor Perini Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in F-Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)35 issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

5

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Los Angeles, California

February 26, 2015

101


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

The following designated exhibits are, as indicated below, either filed herewith or have heretofore been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Act of 1934 and are referred to and incorporated herein by reference to such filings.

Exhibit 2.

Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 2, 2008, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, Trifecta Acquisition LLC, Tutor-Saliba Corporation, Ronald N. Tutor and shareholders of Tutor-Saliba Corporation signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2008).

2.2

Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 28, 2008, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, Trifecta Acquisition LLC, Tutor-Saliba Corporation, Ronald N. Tutor and shareholders of Tutor-Saliba Corporation signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2008).

2.3

Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 1, 2011 by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, Lunda Construction Company, and each of the Shareholders of Lunda Construction Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit  2.1 to Form  8-K filed on July  6, 2011). Exhibits, schedules (or similar attachments) to the Stock Purchase Agreement are not filed. The Company will furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

2.4

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated July 1, 2011 by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, GreenStar Services Corporation, Galaxy Merger, Inc., and GreenStar IH Rep LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2011). Exhibits, schedules (or similar attachments) to the Agreement and Plan of Merger are not filed. The Company will furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

Exhibit 3.

Articles of Incorporation and By-laws

3.1

Restated Articles of Organization (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Form S-2 (File No. 33-28401) filed on April 28, 1989).

3.2

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form S-1 (File No. 333-111338) filed on December 19, 2003).

3.3

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2000.)

3.4

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 11, 2008.)

3.5

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-Q filed on August 10, 2009).

3.6

Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2009).

Exhibit 4.

Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

4.1

Shareholders Agreement, dated April 2, 2008, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, Ronald N. Tutor and the shareholders of Tutor-Saliba Corporation signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2008).

4.2

Amendment No. 1 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2010, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor, as shareholder representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2010).

4.3

Amendment No. 2 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2011, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor, as shareholder representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2011).

4.4

Amendment No. 3 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2011, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor, as shareholder representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2011).

4.5

Indenture, dated October  20, 2010, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, certain subsidiary guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust FSB, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2010).

4.6

Registration Rights Agreement dated October 20, 2010, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, certain subsidiary guarantors named therein and the initial purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2010).

Exhibit 10.

Material Contracts

10.1*

Amendment No. 1 dated March 20, 2009 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated December 23, 2008, by and between Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2009).

102


Table of Contents

10.2*

Tutor Perini Corporation Amended and Restated (2004) Construction Business Unit Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 (File No. 333-111338) filed on March 8, 2004).

10.3*

Amended and Restated Tutor Perini Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended on October 2, 2014 and included as Exhibit A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on October 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.33*

Tutor Perini Corporation 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A filed on April 17, 2009).

10.4*

Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 (File No. 333-111338) filed on February 10, 2004).

   10.5*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Tutor Perini Corporation 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Tutor Perini Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on March 4, 2005).

   10.6

Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Facility dated as of June 5, 2014, with Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent, Swing Line lender and L/C Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2014).

10.66

Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 3, 2011, among Tutor Perini Corporation, the subsidiaries of Tutor Perini named therein, and Bank of America, N.A., and the other lenders that are parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2011).

10.7

First Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 2, 2012, among Tutor Perini Corporation, the subsidiaries of Tutor Perini named therein, and Bank of America, N.A., and the other lenders that are parties thereto — (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q filed on August 7, 2012).

10.8

Promissory Note, dated July 1, 2011, issued by Tutor Perini Corporation to GreenStar IH Rep LLC, in its capacity as the Interest Holder Representative on behalf of certain equity holders of GreenStar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2011).

10.9*

Employment Agreement dated as of March  21, 2011, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and James A. Frost (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8−K filed on March 24, 2011).

10.1

Employment Agreement dated as of December 22.2014, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2014).

10.11*

2009 General Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex B to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A filed on April 17, 2009).

  10.12

Commercial Lease Agreement, dated April 18, 2014 by and among Tutor-Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014).

      10.13

Industrial Lease Agreement, dated April 18, 2014 by and among Tutor-Perini Corporation and Kristra Investments, Ltd (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014).

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Tutor Perini Corporation - filed herewith.

Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - filed herewith.

Exhibit 24

Power of Attorney - filed herewith.

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002—filed herewith.

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — filed herewith.

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — filed herewith.

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — filed herewith.

Exhibit 95

Mine Safety Disclosure — filed herewith.

Exhibit 101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

Exhibit 101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

Exhibit 101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

______________

*    Management contract or compensatory arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K

103