FORM 10-K



United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, DC 20549



(Mark One)





 

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934.



For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2016.





 

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



For the transition period from-to-.



Commission File No. 1-6314



Tutor Perini Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





 

 

Massachusetts

 

04-1717070

(State of Incorporation)

 

(IRS Employer Identification No.)







 

 

15901 Olden Street, Sylmar, California

 

91342

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)







(818) 362-8391

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:





 

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $1.00 par value

 

The New York Stock Exchange



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No  ☒ 



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes   No  



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   No 



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ☒  No 



Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):





 

 

 

 

 

 

Large accelerated filer

 

Accelerated filer

 

Non-accelerated filer

 

Smaller reporting company



 

 

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   No



The aggregate market value of voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $829,622,621$900,681,219 as of June 30, 2015,2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.



The number of shares of Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share, outstanding at February 23, 201617, 2017 was 49,072,710.49,222,934.



Documents Incorporated by Reference



Portions of the definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K.

 

 


 











TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION



20152016 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K



TABLE OF CONTENTS





 

 



 

PAGE

PART II.

 

 

Item 11.

Business

Item 1A1A.

Risk Factors

11 

Item 1B1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

1415 

Item 22.

Properties

1516 

Item 33.

Legal Proceedings

1516 

Item 44.

Mine Safety Disclosures

1516 



 

 

PART IIII.

 

 

Item 55.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

1617 

Item 66.

Selected Financial Data

1719 

Item 77.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

1821 

Item 7A7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

2830 

Item 88.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

2830 

Item 99.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

2830 

Item 9A9A.

Controls and Procedures

2830 

Item 9B9B.

Other Information

3032 



 

 

PART IIIIII.

 

 

Item 1010.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

3032 

Item 1111.

Executive Compensation

3032 

Item 1212.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

3032 

Item 1313.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

3032 

Item 1414.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

3032 



 

 

PART IVIV.

 

 

Item 1515.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

3133 



Signatures

3435 





 

2

 


 

Table of Contents

 

PART I.



Forward-Looking Statements



The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), including without limitation, statements regarding our management’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future and statements regarding future guidance or estimates and non-historical performance. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith, and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are listed and discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors, below. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.



ITEM 1. BUSINESS



General



Tutor Perini Corporation, formerly known as Perini Corporation, was incorporated in 1918 as a successor to businesses which had been engaged in providing construction services since 1894. Tutor Perini Corporation and(together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“Tutor“Tutor Perini,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” unless the context indicates otherwise) is a leading construction company, based on revenue, as ranked by Engineering News-Record (“ENR”), offering diversified general contracting, construction management and design-build services to private customers and public agencies throughout the world. Our corporate headquarters are in Sylmar,Los Angeles (Sylmar), California, and we have various other principal office locations throughout the United States and certain U.S. territories (see Item 2. Properties for a listing of our major facilities). Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TPC”.“TPC.” We are incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.



We and our predecessors have provided construction services since 1894 and have established a strong reputation within our markets by executing large, complex projects on time and within budget while adhering to strict quality control measures. We offer general contracting, pre-construction planning and comprehensive project management services, including the planning and scheduling of the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for a project. We also offer self-performed construction services including site work,work; concrete forming and placement,placement; steel erection, electrical, mechanical, plumbing,erection; electrical; mechanical; plumbing; and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC). During 2015,2016, we performed work on more than 1,500 construction projects.



Our business is conducted through three basic segments: Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors, as described below in the “Business Segment Overview.”



Historically, we have beenWe are recognized as one of the leading civil contractors in the United States, as evidenced by our past and current performance on several of the country’s largest mass-transit and transportation projects, such as the McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas, the East Side Access project in New York City, the San Francisco Central Subway extension to Chinatown and major portions of the Red Line Subway project in Los Angeles. We are also recognized as one of the leading building contractors in the United States, as evidenced by our performance on several of the largest hospitality and gaming projects, including CityCenter and the Cosmopolitan Casino and Resort and large transportation projects, such as the McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Vegas.

In 2008, we embarked upon a strategy to better align our business to pursue markets with higher profit margins and the best long-term growth potential, while maintaining our presence as a leading contractor in the general building market. In September 2008, weour predecessors, Perini Corporation and Tutor-Saliba Corporation (“Tutor-Saliba”), completed a merger with Tutor-Saliba Corporation (“Tutor-Saliba”) to providewhich provided us with enhanced opportunities for growth not available to us on a stand-alone basis through increased size, scale, bonding capacity, immediate access to multiple geographic regions, management capabilities, complementary assets and expertise in large civil projects. The success of the Tutor-Saliba merger and the execution of the Company’s strategy to focus on capturing higher-margin civil projects are best illustrated by the significant growth we have experienced in our Civil segment over the past five years.



In 2010 and 2011, we took advantage of opportunities to expand our Company vertically and geographically through the strategic acquisitions of seven companies with demonstrated success in their respective markets. These acquisitions strengthened our geographic presence in our Building and Civil segments and also significantly increased our specialty contracting capabilities. In 2011, we completed an internal reorganization of our reporting segments with the creation of the Specialty Contractors segment, which we describe below. Furthermore, during 2014, we completed a reorganization, which resulted in the elimination of the Management Services segment. The Management Services segment formerly consisted of two subsidiary companies, Black Construction and Perini Management Services, which have since been included in the Civil and Building segments, respectively.



We believe that the successful completion of our acquisition strategy hasacquisitions have enabled us to realize cross-selling opportunities across an expanded geographic footprint, while continuing to focus on vertical integration through increased self-performedself-perform work capabilities, thus further improving profitability and providing greater stability during economic cycles.

3

 


 

Table of Contents

 



Business Segment Overview



Civil Segment



Our Civil segment specializes in public works construction and the repair, replacement and reconstruction of infrastructure across most of the major geographic regions of the United States. Our civil contracting services include construction and rehabilitation of highways, bridges, tunnels, mass-transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities.



The Civil segment is comprised of the Company’s legacy heavy civil construction operations (civil operations of the formerour predecessors, Perini Corporation, Tutor-Saliba and Tutor-Saliba, includingits subsidiary, Black Construction) and the following three companies acquired by the Company in 2011.2011: Frontier-Kemper, Lunda Construction, and Becho. Frontier-Kemper is a heavy civil contractor engaged in: 1)in the constructingconstruction of tunnels for highways, railroads, subways and rapid transit systems,systems; the construction of shafts and other facilities for water supply, wastewater transport and hydroelectric projects,projects; and 2) the developingdevelopment and equipping of mines with innovative hoisting, elevator and vertical conveyance systems. Lunda Construction is a heavy civil contractor engaged in the construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of bridges, railroads and other civil structures throughout the United States. Becho is engaged in drilling, foundation and excavation support for shoring, bridges, piers, roads and highway projects, primarily in the southwestern United States. We believe that the Company has benefitted through these acquisitions by allowing us to expand ouran expanded geographic presence, enhance ourenhanced civil construction capabilities and addthe addition of experienced management with a proven, successful track record.records.



Our Civil segment’s customers primarily award contracts through one of two methods: the traditional public “competitive bid” method, in which price is the major determining factor, or through a request for proposals where contracts are awarded based on a combination of technical capability and price.



Traditionally, our Civil segment’s customers require each contractor to pre-qualify for construction business by meeting criteria that include technical capabilities and financial strength. Our financial strength and outstanding record of performance on challenging civil works projects often enable us to pre-qualify for projects in situations where smaller, less diversified contractors are unable to meet the qualification requirements. We believe this is a competitive advantage that makes us an attractive partner on the largest, most complex infrastructure projects and prestigious design-build, or DBOM (design-build-operate-maintain) contracts, which combine the nation’s top contractors with engineering firms, equipment manufacturers and project development consultants in a competitive bid selection process to execute highly sophisticated projects.



In its 20152016 rankings, ENR ranked us as the nation’s fourth largest domestic heavy contractor, fourth largest contractor in the transportation market and fourteenthtenth largest contractor overall.



We believe the Civil segment provides significant opportunities for growth due to the age and condition of existing infrastructure coupled with large government funding sources aimed at the replacement and repairreconstruction of aging U.S. infrastructure and popular, often bipartisan, support from the public and elected officials for infrastructure improvement programs. Funding for major civil infrastructure projects is typically provided through a combination of one or more of the following: local, regional, state and federal loans; grants; other direct allocations sourced through tax revenue; bonds; and user fees.



We have been active in civil construction since 1894 and believe we have a particular expertise in large, complex civil construction projects. We have completed or are currently working on some of the most significant civil construction projects in the United States. For example, we are currently working on various segments of the East Side Access project in New York City; the first segmentphase of the California High-Speed Rail project; the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR-99 bored tunnel) project in Seattle, Washington; the Third Street Light Rail-Central Subway project in San Francisco, California; the platform over the eastern rail yard and the Amtrak Tunnel at Hudson Yards in New York City; and the rehabilitation of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge in New York; the New Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California; and the construction of express toll lanes along I-95 in Maryland.York. We have also performed runway widening and reconstruction projects at the John F. Kennedy International Airport in Queens, New York, and completed the New Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California,  the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California, and express toll lanes along I-95 in Maryland. In January of 2017, a joint-venture team we are leading was awarded a $1.4 billion contract for the Purple Line Segment 2 expansion project in Los Angeles, California.



Building Segment



Our Building segment has significant experience providing services to a number of specialized building markets for private and public works customers, including the hospitality and gaming, transportation, health care, corporate and municipal offices, sports and entertainment, education, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical, industrial and high-tech markets. We believe the success of the Building segment results from our proven ability to manage and perform large, complex projects with aggressive fast-track schedules,schedules; elaborate designsdesigns; and advanced mechanical, electrical and life safety systems, while providing accurate budgeting and strict quality control. Although price is a key competitive factor, we believe our strong reputation, long-standing customer relationships and significant level of repeat and referral business have enabled us to achieve our leading position.

4

 


 

Table of Contents

 

The Building segment is comprised of several operating units that provide general contracting, design-build, preconstruction and construction services in various regions of the United States. Tutor Perini Building Corp. focuses on large, complex building projects nationwide, including significant projects in the hospitality and gaming, commercial office, education, government facilities, and multi-unit residential markets. Rudolph and Sletten focuses on large, complex projects in California in the commercial office, technology, industrial, education, and government facilities markets. Roy Anderson Corp. (formerly known as Anderson Companies) provides its services, including disaster rapid response services, to public and private customers primarily throughout the southeastern United States. Perini Management Services provides diversified construction and design-build services to U.S. military and government agencies, as well as to surety companies and multi-national corporations in the United States and locations overseas. We believe that our national resources and strong résumé of notable projects will enable future growth on large, complex building projects.



In its 20152016 rankings, ENR ranked us as the tenthsixth largest generaldomestic building contractor in the United States.contractor. We are a recognized leader in the hospitality and gaming market, specializing in the construction of high-end resorts and casinos. We work with hotel operators, Native American tribal councils, developers and architectural firms to provide diversified construction services to meet the challenges of new construction and renovation of hotel and resort properties. We believe that our reputation for completing projects on time is a significant competitive advantage in this market, as any delay in project completion could result in significant loss of revenue for the customer.



We have recently completed, or are currently working on, large private and public building projects across a wide array of building end markets, including commercial offices, multi-unit residential, health care, hospitality and gaming, transportation, education, and entertainment. Specific projects include:include a large office andtechnology research and development office building in northern California for a confidential technology customer; the Panorama Tower in Miami, Florida; Tower C and Tower D and the Retail Gallery at Hudson Yards and the George Washington Bridge Bus Station redevelopment in New York City; the Washington Hospital expansion in Fremont, California; the Graton Rancheria Resort and Casino in Rohnert Park, California; the Chumash Casino Resort expansion in Santa Ynez, California; the Scarlet Pearl Casino Resort in D’Iberville, Mississippi; the Broadway Plaza retail development in Walnut Creek, California; Kaiser Hospital Buildings in San Leandro and Redwood City, California; and courthouses in San Bernardino and San Diego, California and Broward County, Florida. As a result of our reputation and track record, we were previously awarded and completed contracts for several marquee projects in the hospitality and gaming market, including the Resorts World New York Casino in Jamaica, New York, and CityCenter, Thethe Cosmopolitan Resort and Casino, the Wynn Encore Hotel and Planet Hollywood, all in Las Vegas, Nevada. These projects span a wide array of building end markets and illustrate our Building segment’s résumé of successfully completed large-scale public and private projects.



Specialty Contractors Segment



Our Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems and pneumatically placed concrete for a full range of civil and building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass-transit end markets. This segment provides the Company with unique strengths and capabilities that position us as a full-service contractor with greater control over scheduled work, project delivery and risk management.



The Specialty Contractors segment is comprised of several operating units that provide unique services in various regions of the United States. Five Star Electric is one of the largest specialty contractorselectrical contractor in New York City, providing construction services in the electrical sector, including power, lighting, fire alarm, security, telecommunications, low voltage and wireless systems. Five Star Electric has established itself as an industry leader performing work in both the public and private sectors, including high-end residential, hotel and commercial towers, transportation, water treatment plants, schools and universities, health care, retail, sports and government facilities. Fisk Electric covers many of the major commercial, transportation and industrial electrical construction markets in the southwestern and southeastern United States, with the ability to cover other attractive markets nationwide. Fisk’s expertise is in technology design and the development of electrical and technology systems for major projects spanning a broad variety of project types, including commercial office buildings, sports arenas, hospitals, research laboratories, hotels and casinos, convention centers, manufacturing plants, refineries and water and wastewater treatment facilities. WDF, Nagelbush and Desert Mechanical each provide mechanical, plumbing, HVAC and fire protection services to a range of customers in a wide variety of markets, including transportation, commercial/industrial, schools and universities and residential. WDF servicesis one of the largest mechanical contractors servicing the New York City metropolitan region, Nagelbush operates primarily in Florida, and Desert Mechanical operates primarily in the western United States. Superior Gunite specializes in pneumatically placed structural concrete utilized in infrastructure projects nationwide, such as bridges, dams, tunnels and retaining walls.



In its 20152016 rankings, ENR ranked us as the fifth largest electrical contractor1, tentheleventh largest mechanical contractor and seventhtenth largest specialty contractor1 in the United States. Through Five Star Electric and WDF, collectively, we are also the largest specialty contractor in the New York City metropolitan area.



1 This ranking represents the collective revenue of the Company’s specialty contracting subsidiaries as reported to ENR.

5

 


 

Table of Contents

 

We have recently completed, or are currently working on, severalvarious electrical and mechanical projects at the World Trade Center and at Hudson Yards in New York City;City, two signal system modernization projects in New York City;City and electrical work for the new hospital at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.Center in Dallas, Texas. This segment has supported, or is currently supporting, several large projects in our Building and Civil segments, including the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR-99 bored tunnel) project in Seattle, Washington; the McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas, Nevada; the Resorts World New York Casino in Jamaica, New York; various segments of the Greenwich Street Corridor and East Side Access projects in New York City; the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California; the New Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California; and several marquee projects in the hospitality and gaming market, including CityCenter, Thethe Cosmopolitan Resort and Casino and Planet Hollywood, all in Las Vegas, Nevada.



The majority of work performed by our Specialty Contractors units is contracted directly with state and local municipal agencies, real estate developers, general contractors, commercial and industrial customers and school districts.  Adistricts; additionally, a smaller, but growing, component of its work is performed as a subcontractor to the Company’sour Building and Civil segments.



Markets and Customers



We provide diversified construction services to a variety of end markets and customers. The following tables set forth certain reportable segment information relating to the Company’s operationoperations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013.2014.











 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue by Business Segment

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Civil

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

Building

 

1,802,535 

 

 

1,503,837 

 

 

1,551,979 

 

2,069,841 

 

 

1,802,535 

 

 

1,503,837 

Specialty Contractors

 

1,228,030 

 

 

1,301,328 

 

 

1,182,277 

 

1,234,272 

 

 

1,228,030 

 

 

1,301,328 

Total

$

4,920,472 

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

4,175,672 

$

4,973,076 

 

$

4,920,472 

 

$

4,492,309 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Mass Transit

$

547,913 

 

$

450,436 

 

$

534,110 

Bridges

$

662,553 

 

$

535,733 

 

$

501,867 

 

533,762 

 

 

662,553 

 

 

535,733 

Mass Transit

 

450,436 

 

 

534,110 

 

 

364,148 

Highways

 

388,963 

 

 

156,443 

 

 

211,316 

 

290,745 

 

 

388,963 

 

 

156,443 

Other

 

387,955 

 

 

460,858 

 

 

364,085 

 

296,543 

 

 

387,955 

 

 

460,858 

Total

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Office

$

441,591 

 

$

226,928 

 

$

2,722 

Industrial and Commercial

 

271,480 

 

 

266,921 

 

 

90,194 

Municipal and Government

$

335,762 

 

$

300,274 

 

$

325,258 

 

262,022 

 

 

335,762 

 

 

300,274 

Industrial Buildings

 

266,921 

 

 

90,194 

 

 

34,802 

Health Care Facilities

 

235,005 

 

 

164,963 

 

 

127,963 

Hospitality and Gaming

 

250,757 

 

 

101,819 

 

 

376,620 

 

216,224 

 

 

250,757 

 

 

101,819 

Office

 

226,928 

 

 

2,722 

 

 

12,125 

Education Facilities

 

186,944 

 

 

337,062 

 

 

280,685 

Health Care Facilities

 

164,963 

 

 

127,963 

 

 

296,294 

Condominiums

 

125,949 

 

 

115,251 

 

 

14,177 

 

193,755 

 

 

125,949 

 

 

115,251 

Mixed Use

 

112,737 

 

 

159,083 

 

 

60,647 

 

163,454 

 

 

112,737 

 

 

159,083 

Education Facilities

 

157,808 

 

 

186,944 

 

 

337,062 

Other

 

131,574 

 

 

269,469 

 

 

151,371 

 

128,502 

 

 

131,574 

 

 

269,469 

Total

$

1,802,535 

 

$

1,503,837 

 

$

1,551,979 

$

2,069,841 

 

$

1,802,535 

 

$

1,503,837 



6

 


 

Table of Contents

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Contractors Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Condominiums

$

266,648 

 

$

105,670 

 

$

133,916 

$

239,937 

 

$

266,648 

 

$

105,670 

Mass Transit

 

204,398 

 

 

107,120 

 

 

217,318 

Industrial and Commercial

 

186,769 

 

 

164,480 

 

 

276,008 

Transportation

 

164,468 

 

 

149,971 

 

 

61,288 

Mixed Use

 

159,286 

 

 

96,072 

 

 

36,008 

Education Facilities

 

195,647 

 

 

230,645 

 

 

123,910 

 

80,476 

 

 

195,647 

 

 

230,645 

Industrial Buildings

 

164,480 

 

 

276,008 

 

 

212,438 

Transportation

 

149,971 

 

 

61,288 

 

 

 —

Mass Transit

 

107,120 

 

 

217,318 

 

 

174,778 

Mixed Use

 

96,072 

 

 

36,008 

 

 

8,234 

Health Care Facilities

 

60,233 

 

 

40,228 

 

 

30,591 

Wastewater Treatment

 

73,094 

 

 

69,000 

 

 

81,155 

 

58,479 

 

 

73,094 

 

 

69,000 

Office Buildings

 

67,334 

 

 

129,350 

 

 

137,189 

Other

 

107,664 

 

 

176,041 

 

 

310,657 

 

80,226 

 

 

134,770 

 

 

274,800 

Total

$

1,228,030 

 

$

1,301,328 

 

$

1,182,277 

$

1,234,272 

 

$

1,228,030 

 

$

1,301,328 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue by Customer Type

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

State and Local Government Agencies

 

55 

%

 

56 

%

 

60 

%

State and Local Agencies

49 

%

 

55 

%

 

56 

%

Private Owners

 

40 

%

 

40 

%

 

35 

%

45 

%

 

40 

%

 

40 

%

Federal Government Agencies

 

%

 

%

 

%

Federal Agencies

%

 

%

 

%

Total

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%



State and Local Government Agencies. Our state and local government customers include state transportation departments, metropolitan authorities, cities, municipal agencies, school districts and public universities. We provide services to our state and local customers primarily pursuant to contracts awarded through competitive bidding processes. Our building construction services for state and local government customers have included judicial and correctional facilities, schools and dormitories, health care facilities, convention centers, parking structures and other municipal buildings. OurThe vast majority of our civil contracting and building construction services are provided in locations throughout the country.United States and its territories.



Private Owners. Our private customers include real estate developers, health care companies, technology companies, hospitality and gaming resort owners, Native American sovereign nations, public corporations and private universities. We provide services to our private customers through negotiated contract arrangements, as well as through competitive bids.



Federal Government Agencies. Our federal government customers include the U.S. State Department, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Air Force and the National Park Service. We provide services to federal agencies primarily pursuant to contracts for specific or multi-year assignments that involve new construction or infrastructure repairs or improvements. A portion of our revenue from federal agencies is derived from projects in overseas locations. Welocations, which we expect this to continue for the foreseeable future as a result of our experience and strong relationships with federal agencies, together with anticipated expenditures for defense, diplomatic and security-related construction work.



Most federal, state and local government contracts contain provisions that permit the termination of contracts, in whole or in part, for the convenience of the government, among other reasons.



For additional information on measures of profit or lossrevenue and total assets for both the United States and foreign and U.S. territories,by geographic location, see Note 910 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



7

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Backlog



Backlog in our industry is a measure of the total value of work that is remaining to be performed on contracts awarded. We include a construction project in our backlog when a contract is awarded or a letter of commitment is obtained and we believe adequate funding is in place. As a result, we believe our backlog is firm, thoughand although cancellations or scope adjustments may occur. Historically, weoccur, historically they have not been negatively impacted by material cancellations or scope adjustments.material. Our backlog by segment, and end market and customer type is as follows:

presented in the following tables:









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog by Business Segment

December 31,

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Civil

$

2,743,708 

 

37 

%

 

$

3,563,239 

 

45 

%

$

2,672,126 

 

43 

%

 

$

2,743,708 

 

37 

%

Building

 

2,780,440 

 

37 

%

 

2,187,767 

 

28 

%

 

1,981,193 

 

32 

%

 

2,780,440 

 

37 

%

Specialty Contractors

 

1,940,981 

 

26 

%

 

 

2,080,719 

 

27 

%

 

1,573,818 

 

25 

%

 

 

1,940,981 

 

26 

%

Total

$

7,465,129 

 

100 

%

 

$

7,831,725 

 

100 

%

$

6,227,137 

 

100 

%

 

$

7,465,129 

 

100 

%



We estimate that approximately $4.4$3.4 billion, or 59%54%, of our backlog as of December 31, 20152016 will be recognized as revenue in 2016.2017.









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Backlog by End Market

December 31,

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Mass Transit

$

1,455,194 

 

53 

%

 

$

1,934,028 

 

54 

%

$

1,853,117 

 

69 

%

 

$

1,455,194 

 

53 

%

Highways

 

379,630 

 

14 

%

 

505,998 

 

18 

%

Bridges

 

497,702 

 

18 

%

 

894,975 

 

25 

%

 

297,810 

 

11 

%

 

497,702 

 

18 

%

Highways

 

505,998 

 

18 

%

 

349,399 

 

10 

%

Other

 

284,814 

 

11 

%

 

 

384,837 

 

11 

%

 

141,569 

 

%

 

 

284,814 

 

11 

%

Total

$

2,743,708 

 

100 

%

 

$

3,563,239 

 

100 

%

$

2,672,126 

 

100 

%

 

$

2,743,708 

 

100 

%









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Segment Backlog by End Market

December 31,

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Hospitality and Gaming

$

517,017 

 

26 

%

 

$

67,530 

 

%

Office

$

722,582 

 

26 

%

 

$

14,578 

 

%

 

342,034 

 

17 

%

 

722,582 

 

26 

%

Industrial Buildings

 

250,511 

 

%

 

96,251 

 

%

Mixed Use

 

249,088 

 

13 

%

 

340,086 

 

12 

%

Municipal and Government

 

206,164 

 

10 

%

 

337,273 

 

12 

%

Health Care Facilities

 

192,280 

 

10 

%

 

333,759 

 

12 

%

Condominiums

 

352,251 

 

13 

%

 

244,549 

 

11 

%

 

169,366 

 

%

 

352,251 

 

13 

%

Municipal and Government

 

337,273 

 

12 

%

 

555,990 

 

25 

%

Education Facilities

 

233,414 

 

%

 

318,380 

 

15 

%

 

168,634 

 

%

 

233,414 

 

%

Health Care Facilities

 

333,759 

 

12 

%

 

276,123 

 

13 

%

Hospitality and Gaming

 

67,530 

 

%

 

265,565 

 

12 

%

Mixed Use

 

340,086 

 

12 

%

 

78,751 

 

%

Industrial and Commercial

 

74,787 

 

%

 

250,511 

 

%

Other

 

143,034 

 

%

 

 

337,580 

 

15 

%

 

61,823 

 

%

 

 

143,034 

 

%

Total

$

2,780,440 

 

100 

%

 

$

2,187,767 

 

100 

%

$

1,981,193 

 

100 

%

 

$

2,780,440 

 

100 

%









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Contractors Segment Backlog by End Market

December 31,

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Mass Transit

$

596,455 

 

31 

%

 

$

805,253 

 

39 

%

$

612,688 

 

39 

%

 

$

596,455 

 

31 

%

Mixed Use

 

239,763 

 

15 

%

 

262,941 

 

14 

%

Condominiums

 

272,061 

 

14 

%

 

220,466 

 

11 

%

 

153,354 

 

10 

%

 

272,061 

 

14 

%

Mixed Use

 

262,941 

 

14 

%

 

111,994 

 

%

Industrial and Commercial

 

130,028 

 

%

 

180,957 

 

%

Transportation

 

228,536 

 

12 

%

 

234,088 

 

11 

%

 

105,990 

 

%

 

228,536 

 

12 

%

Industrial Buildings

 

180,957 

 

%

 

144,076 

 

%

Health Care Facilities

 

101,494 

 

%

 

47,862 

 

%

Education Facilities

 

93,752 

 

%

 

239,487 

 

12 

%

 

83,897 

 

%

 

93,752 

 

%

Office

 

63,462 

 

%

 

85,891 

 

%

Wastewater Treatment

 

57,963 

 

%

 

98,669 

 

%

Other

 

184,854 

 

%

 

 

140,795 

 

%

 

146,604 

 

10 

%

 

 

258,417 

 

13 

%

Total

$

1,940,981 

 

100 

%

 

$

2,080,719 

 

100 

%

$

1,573,818 

 

100 

%

 

$

1,940,981 

 

100 

%



8

 


 

Table of Contents

 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Backlog by Customer Type

As of December 31,



2016

 

2015

State and Local Agencies

57 

%

 

55 

%

Private Owners

36 

%

 

38 

%

Federal Agencies

%

 

%

Total

100 

%

 

100 

%

Types of Contracts



The general contracting and management services we provide consist of planning and scheduling the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for the timely completion of a project in accordance with the terms, plans and specifications contained in a construction contract. We provide these services by entering into traditional general contracting arrangements such as fixed price, guaranteed maximum price and cost plus fee contracts. These contract types and the risks generally inherent therein are discussed below:follows:

·

Fixed price or lump-sum contracts are most commonly used for projects in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments and generally commit the Company to provide all of the resources required to complete a project for a fixed sum. Usually, fixed price contracts transfer more risk to the Company, but offer the opportunity for greater profits.

·

Guaranteed maximum price (“GMP”) contracts provide for a cost plus fee arrangement up to a maximum agreed upon price. These contracts place risks on the Company for amounts in excess of the GMP, but may permit an opportunity for greater profits than under cost plus fee contracts through sharing agreements with the owner on any cost savings that may be realized. Services provided by our Building segment to various private customers are often performed under GMP contracts.

·

Unit price contracts are most prevalent for projects in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments and generally commit the Company to provide an undetermined number of units or components that comprise a project at a fixed price per unit. This approach shifts the risk of estimating the quantity of units required to the project owner, but the risk of increased cost per unit is borne by the Company, unless otherwise allowed for in the contract.

·

Cost plus fee contracts provideare used for reimbursement of project costs plus a stipulated fee.many projects in the Building and Specialty Contractors segments. Cost plus fee contracts include cost plus fixed fee contracts and cost plus award fee contracts. Cost plus fixed fee contracts provide for reimbursement of approved project costs plus a fixed fee. Cost plus award fee contracts provide for reimbursement of the project costs plus a base fee, as well as an incentive fee based on cost and/or schedule performance. Cost plus fee contracts serve to minimize the Company’s financial risk, but may also limit profits.



Fixed price contracts account for a substantial portion of our revenue and are expected to continue to represent a sizeable percentage of both total revenue and backlog. The composition of revenue and backlog by type of contract for fiscal years2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014 is as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

Revenue

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Fixed price

44 

%

 

60 

%

 

57 

%

47 

%

 

44 

%

 

60 

%

Guaranteed maximum price

32 

%

 

24 

%

 

24 

%

28 

%

 

32 

%

 

24 

%

Unit price

12 

%

 

%

 

%

11 

%

 

12 

%

 

%

Cost plus fee and other

12 

%

 

%

 

10 

%

14 

%

 

12 

%

 

%

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As Of December 31,

As of December 31,

Backlog

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Fixed price

55 

%

 

67 

%

63 

%

 

55 

%

Guaranteed maximum price

22 

%

 

20 

%

21 

%

 

22 

%

Unit price

%

 

%

%

 

%

Cost plus fee and other

16 

%

 

%

10 

%

 

16 

%

100 

%

 

100 

%

100 

%

 

100 

%







9


Table of Contents

Competition



The markets in which we compete include numerous competitors. In the small to mid-sized work that we have targeted, we have continued to experience strong pricing competition from our competitors. However, muchMuch of the work that we target, however, is for larger, more complex projects where there are fewer active market participants because of the enhanced capabilities and resources required to perform the work. As a result, on these larger projects we typically face fewer competitors. However,Despite this, over the past yeartwo years we have seen increased competition especially from foreign competitors that have been pursuing major projects in the United States due to the relatively larger size and significant number of U.S. opportunities. We anticipate that the increased level of foreign competition will persist for the foreseeable future.



9


Table of Contents

In our Civil segment, we compete principally with large civil construction firms, including (alphabetically) Dragados USA; Flatiron Construction Corp.; Fluor Corp.;Corporation; Granite Construction; Kiewit Corp.;Corporation; Skanska USA; Traylor Bros., Inc.; and The Walsh Group. In our Building segment, we compete with a variety of national and regional contractors. Our primary competitors are (alphabetically) AECOM (through its acquisitions of Tishman Construction and Hunt Construction Group); Balfour Beatty Construction; Clark Construction Group; DPR Construction; Gilbane, Inc.; Hensel Phelps Construction Co.; McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.; Skanska USA; Suffolk Construction; and Turner Construction Co.; The Walsh Group; and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.Company. In our Specialty Contractors segment, we compete principally with various regional and local electrical, mechanical and plumbing subcontractors. We believe price, experience, reputation, responsiveness, customer relationships, project completion track record, schedule control, risk management and quality of work are key factors customers consider when awarding contracts.



Construction Costs



If prices for materials, labor or equipment increase excessively, provisions in certain types of contracts often shift all or a major portion of any adverse impact to the customer. In our fixed price contracts, we attempt to insulate ourselves from the unfavorable effects of inflation, when possible, by incorporating escalating wage and price assumptions into our construction cost estimates, by obtaining firm fixed price quotes from major subcontractors and material suppliers, and by purchasing required materials early in the project schedule. Construction and other materials used in our construction activities are generally available locally from multiple sources and have been in adequate supply during recent years. Labor resources for our domestic projects are largely obtained through various labor unions with which we are associated. We have not experienced significant labor shortages in recent years, nor do we expect to in the future. We employ expatriate and local labor in selected overseas areas.



Environmental Matters



Our properties and operations are subject to federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including requirements for water discharges; air emissions; the use, management and disposal of solid or hazardous materials or wastes; and the cleanup of contamination. In certain circumstances, we may also be required to hire subcontractors to dispose of hazardous materials encountered on a project in accordance with a plan approved in advance by the owner. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, and we continually evaluate whether we must take additional steps to ensure compliance with those laws and regulations. However, future requirements or amendments to current laws or regulations imposing more stringent requirements could require us to incur additional costs to maintain or achieve compliance.



In addition, some environmental laws, such as the U.S. federal “Superfund” law and similar state statutes, can impose liability for the entire cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former owners or operators or upon parties who generated waste at, or sent waste to, these sites, regardless of who owned the site at the time of the release or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity. Contaminants have been detected at some of the sites that we own and where we have worked as a contractor in the past, and we have incurred costs for the investigation and remediation of hazardous substances. We believe that our liabilityliabilities for these sites isare not material, either individually or in the aggregate, andaggregate. We have pollution liability insurance availablecoverage for such matters, and we receive indemnification from customers to cover the risks associated with environmental remediation.



Insurance and Bonding



All of our properties and equipment, as well as those of our joint ventures, are covered by insurance in amounts that we believe are consistent with our risk of loss and industry practice. Our wholly owned subsidiary, PCR Insurance Company, issues deductible reimbursement policies for subcontractor default insurance, auto liability, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance, allowing us to centralize our claims and risk management functions to reduce our insurance-related costs.



As a normal part of the construction business, we are often required to provide various types of surety bonds as an additional level of security of our performance. We also require many of our higher-risk subcontractors to provide surety bonds as security for payment of subcontractors and suppliers and to guarantee their performance. As an alternative to traditional surety bonds, we also have purchased subcontractor default insurance for certain construction projects to insure against the risk of subcontractor default.



10


Table of Contents

Employees



The number of our employees varies based on the number of active projects, the type and magnitude of those projects, as well as our position within the lifecycle of those projects. Our total number of employees as of December 31, 20152016 was 10,626.11,603.  



We are signatory to numerous local and regional collective bargaining agreements, both directly and through trade associations, as a union contractor. These agreements cover all necessary union crafts and are subject to various renewal dates. Estimated amounts for wage escalation related to the expiration of union contracts are included in our bids on various projects and, as a result,projects; accordingly, the expiration of any union contract in the next fiscal year is not expected to have any material impact on us. During the past several years, we have not experienced any significant work stoppages caused by our union employees.

10


Table of Contents



Financial information about geographic areas is discussed in Note 910 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading “Geographic Information”.Information.”



Available Information



Our website address is www.tutorperini.com. In the ‘‘Investor Relations’’ portion of our website, under “Financial Reports,” subsection ‘‘SEC“SEC Filings,’’ you may obtain free electronic copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, as well as reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act of transactions in our stock by our directors and executive officers. These reports are made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports, and any amendments to them, are also available at the Internet website of the SEC, http://www.sec.gov. The public may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. In order to obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room, you may call 1-800-732-0330. We also maintain various documents, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of the Committees of our Board of Directors in the “Corporate Governance” portion of our website.

  

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS



We are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Set forth below, and elsewhere in this report, are descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.



A significant slowdown or decline in economic conditions could adversely affect our operations.



AlthoughAny significant decline in economic conditions in the United States have gradually improved following several challenging years during the aftermathany of the global economic downturn in 2008, any significant future decline in economic conditions,markets we serve or uncertainty regarding the economic outlook, could result in a decline in demand for infrastructure projects and commercial building developments. In addition, any renewed instability in the financial and credit markets could negatively impact our customers’ ability to pay us on a timely basis, or at all, for work on projects already under construction, could cause our customers to delay or cancel construction projects in our backlog or could create difficulties for customers to obtain adequate financing to fund new construction projects. Such consequences could have an adverse impact on our future operating results. Lastly, we are more susceptible to adverse economic conditions in CaliforniaNew York and New York,California, as a significant portion of our operations are concentrated in those states.

The level of federal, state and local government spending for infrastructure and other public projects could adversely affect the number of projects available to us in the future.

The civil construction and public-works building markets are dependent on the amount of work funded by various government agencies, which depends on many factors including: the condition of the existing infrastructure and buildings; the need for new or expanded infrastructure and buildings; and federal, state and local government spending levels. As a result, our future operating results could be negatively impacted by any decrease in demand for public projects or decrease or delay in government funding, which could result from a variety of factors, including delays in the sale of voter-approved bonds, budget shortfalls, credit rating downgrades or long-term impairment in the ability of state and local governments to raise capital in the municipal bond market.

Competition for new project awards is intense and our failure to compete effectively could reduce our market share and profits.

New project awards are determined through either a competitive bid basis or on a negotiated basis. Projects are generally awarded based upon price but often take into account other factors, such as technical approach and qualifications, duration of project execution and past performance on similar projects completed. Within our industry, we compete with many international, regional and local construction firms. Some of these competitors have achieved greater market penetration than we have in the markets in which we compete, and some have greater resources than we do. If we are unable to compete successfully in such markets, our relative market share and profits could be reduced.



If we are unable to accurately estimate the overall risks, revenue or costs on a contract, we may achieve a lower than anticipated profit or incur a loss on that contract.



Accounting for contract related revenue and costs requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that may change significantly throughout the project lifecycle, resulting in a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. In addition, cost overruns on fixed price and GMP contracts may result in lower profits or losses.

11


Table of Contents

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our debt agreements.

We currently have, and expect to continue to have, a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2015, we had total debt of $823.4 million under our Senior Notes, Credit Agreement and other indebtedness. If we are unable to meet the terms of the financial covenants or fail to comply with any of the other restrictions contained in our indentures, an event of default could occur causing the debt related to that indenture to become immediately due. If such acceleration occurs, we may not be able to repay such indebtedness as required. Since indebtedness under our Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of our assets, acceleration of this debt could result in foreclosure of those assets and a negative impact on our operations. In addition, a failure to meet the terms of our Credit Agreement could result in a reduction of future borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement, causing a loss of liquidity. A loss of liquidity could adversely impact our ability to execute projects in our backlog, obtain new projects, engage subcontractors, and attract and retain key employees.

We may not fully realize the revenue value reported in our backlog due to cancellations or reductions in scope.

As of December 31, 2015, our backlog of uncompleted construction work was approximately $7.5 billion. The revenue projected in our backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits. For example, the cancellation or reduction in scope of any project in our backlog could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are subject to significant legal proceedings which, if determined adversely to us, could harm our reputation, preclude us from bidding on future projects and/or have a material effect on us. We also may invest significant working capital on projects while legal proceedings are being settled.

We are involved in various lawsuits, including the legal proceedings described under Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Litigation is inherently uncertain, and it is not possible to accurately predict what the final outcome will be of any legal proceeding. We must make certain assumptions and rely on estimates,  which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties,  regarding potential outcomes of legal proceedings in order to determine an appropriate contingent liability and charge to income. Any result that is materially different than our estimates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, any adverse judgments could harm our reputation and preclude us from bidding on future projects.

We occasionally bring claims against project owners for additional cost exceeding the contract price or for amounts not included in the original contract price. When these types of events occur and unresolved claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of claims could have a material effect on our liquidity and financial results.



Our contracts require us to perform extra, or change order, work, which can result in disputes or claims and adversely affect our working capital, profits and cash flows.



Our contracts generally require us to perform extra, or change order, work as directed by the customer even if the customer has not agreed in advance on the scope or price of the work to be performed. This process may result in disputes or claims over whether the work performed is beyond the scope of work directed by the customer and/or exceeds the price the customer is willing to pay for the work performed. To the extent we do not recover our costs for this work or there are delays in the recovery of these costs, our cash flows and working capital could be adversely impacted.

11


Table of Contents

We are subject to significant legal proceedings which, if determined adversely to us, could harm our reputation, preclude us from bidding on future projects and/or have a material effect on us. We also may invest significant working capital on projects while legal proceedings are being settled.

We are involved in various lawsuits, including the legal proceedings described under Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Litigation is inherently uncertain, and it is not possible to accurately predict what the final outcome will be of any legal proceeding. We must make certain assumptions and rely on estimates, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, regarding potential outcomes of legal proceedings in order to determine an appropriate contingent liability and charge to income. Any result that is materially different than our estimates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, any adverse judgments could harm our reputation and preclude us from bidding on future projects.

We occasionally bring claims against project owners for additional cost exceeding the contract price or for amounts not included in the original contract price. When these types of events occur and unresolved claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of claims could have a material effect on our liquidity and financial results.

Competition for new project awards is intense, and our failure to compete effectively could reduce our market share and profits.

New project awards are determined through either a competitive bid basis or on a negotiated basis. Projects are generally awarded based upon price but often take into account other factors, such as technical approach and qualifications, duration of project execution and past performance on similar projects completed. Within our industry, we compete with many international, regional and local construction firms. Some of these competitors have achieved greater market penetration than we have in the markets in which we compete, and some have greater resources than we do. If we are unable to compete successfully in such markets, our relative market share and profits could be reduced.

We may not fully realize the revenue value reported in our backlog due to cancellations or reductions in scope.

As of December 31, 2016, our backlog of uncompleted construction work was approximately $6.2 billion. The revenue projected in our backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits. For example, the cancellation or reduction in scope of any project in our backlog could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our debt agreements.

We currently have, and expect to continue to have, a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2016, we had total debt of $759.5 million. If we are unable to meet the terms of the financial covenants or fail to comply with any of the other restrictions contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness, an event of default could occur, causing the debt related to such agreement to become immediately due. If such acceleration occurs, we may not be able to repay such indebtedness as required. Since indebtedness under our Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of our assets, acceleration of this debt could result in foreclosure of those assets and a negative impact on our operations. In addition, a failure to meet the terms of our Credit Agreement could result in a reduction of future borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement, causing a loss of liquidity. A loss of liquidity could adversely impact our ability to execute projects in our backlog, obtain new projects, engage subcontractors, and attract and retain key employees.



Our actual results could differ from the assumptions and estimates used to prepare our financial statements.



In preparing our financial statements, we are required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) to make estimates and assumptions as of the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring significant estimates by our management include:include, but are not limited to:



• recognition of contract revenue, costs, profits or losses in applying the principles of percentage-of-completion accounting;

• recognition of revenue related to project incentives or awards we expect to receive;

• recognition of recoveries under contract change orders or claims;

• estimated amounts for expected project losses, warranty costs, contract close-out or other costs;

• collectability of billed and unbilled accounts receivable;

• asset valuations;

• income tax provisions and related valuation allowances;

12


Table of Contents

• determination of expense and potential liabilities under pension and other post-retirement benefit programs; and

• accruals for other estimated liabilities, including litigation and insurance revenue/reserves.

12


Table of Contents



Our actual business and financial results could differ from our estimates of such results, which could have a material negative impact on our financial condition and reported results of operations.

The level of federal, state and local government spending for infrastructure and other public projects could adversely affect the number of projects available to us in the future.

The civil construction and public-works building markets are dependent on the amount of work funded by various government agencies, which depends on many factors, including the condition of the existing infrastructure and buildings; the need for new or expanded infrastructure and buildings; and federal, state and local government spending levels. As a result, our future operating results could be negatively impacted by any decrease in demand for public projects or decrease or delay in government funding, which could result from a variety of factors, including delays in the sale of voter-approved bonds, budget shortfalls, credit rating downgrades or long-term impairment in the ability of state and local governments to raise capital in the municipal bond market.



The construction services industry is highly schedule driven, and our failure to meet the schedule requirements of our contracts could adversely affect our reputation and/or expose us to financial liability.



Many of our contracts are subject to specific completion schedule requirements. Any failure to meet contractual schedule requirements could subject us to liquidated damages, liability for our customer’s actual cost arising out of our delay and damage to our reputation.



We require substantial personnel, including construction and project managers and specialty subcontractor resources to execute and perform our contracts in backlog. The successful execution of our business strategies is also dependent upon our ability to attract, retain and implement succession plans for key officers.



Our ability to execute and perform on our contracts in backlog depends in large part upon our ability to hire and retain highly skilled personnel, including project and construction management and trade labor resources, such as carpenters, masons and other skilled workers. In the event we are unable to attract, hire and retain the requisite personnel and subcontractors necessary to execute and perform our backlog, we may experience delays in completing projects in accordance with project schedules or an increase in expected costs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, our reputation and our relationships. In addition, if we lack the personnel and specialty subcontractors necessary to perform on our current contract backlog, we may find it necessary to curtail our pursuit of new projects.



The execution of our business strategies also substantially depends on our ability to retain several key members of our management. Losing any of these individuals could adversely affect our business. The majority of these key officers are not bound by employment agreements. Volatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key staff to whom we have provided share-based compensation. Additionally, because a substantial portion of our key executives' compensation is placed "at risk" and linked to the performance of our business, when our operating results are negatively impacted, we are at greater risk of employee turnover. If we lose our existing key executives and are unable to execute a succession plan our operating results would likely be harmed.



Systems and information technology interruption and breaches in data security could adversely impact our ability to operate and negatively impact our operating results.



We are reliant on computer and other information technology that could be interrupted or damaged by a variety of factors including, but not limited to, cyber-attacks, natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, acts of war, computer viruses and physical damage. The resulting consequences could include a loss of critical data, a delay in operations or an unintentional disclosure of confidential information, any of which could have a material impact to our Company and its consolidated financial statements.



Our participation in construction joint ventures exposes us to liability and/or harm to our reputation for failures by our partners.



As part of our business, we enter into joint venture arrangements typically to jointly bid on and execute particular projects, thereby reducing our risk profile while enhancing the execution capability and financial reward of project teams. Success on these joint projects depends in large part on whether our joint venturejoint-venture partners satisfy their contractual obligations. We and our joint venturejoint-venture partners are generally jointly and severally liable for all liabilities and obligations of our joint ventures. If a joint venture partner fails to perform or is financially unable to bear its portion of required capital contributions or other obligations, including liabilities stemming from lawsuits, we could be required to make additional investments, provide additional services or pay more than our proportionate share of a liability to make up for our partner’s shortfall. Further, if we are unable to adequately address our partner’s

13


Table of Contents

performance issues, the customer may terminate the project, which could result in legal liability to us, harm our reputation, reduce our profit on a project or, in some cases, result in a loss.



We are subject to a number of risks as a U.S. government contractor, which could harm our reputation, result in fines or penalties against us and/or adversely impact our financial condition.



Failure to comply with laws and regulations related to government contracts could result in contract termination, suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. government, civil fines and criminal prosecution, any of which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and future financial condition and performance.



13Conversion of our outstanding Convertible Notes could dilute ownership interests of existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.




TableBased on the terms of Contentsthe indenture for the Convertible Notes, we may redeem the Convertible Notes in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of the two. As a result, a conversion of some or all of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of our common stock issuable upon such conversion of the Convertible Notes could cause the price of our common stock to decline. In addition, the existence of the Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because a conversion of the Convertible Notes could depress the price of our common stock.



We may need to include the potential dilutive impact of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation.

We currently intend to pay the principal amount of our Convertible Notes in cash; therefore, we have not included the potential dilutive effect of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculations. If, however, there is a change in future circumstances as a result of a decline in our projected cash flow or for other reasons, we may conclude at such time that it will be preferable to use shares to satisfy the Convertible Notes. Such a change in our intentions would result in the inclusion of the potential dilutive impact of the Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation, which would result in a decrease in our diluted earnings per share. 

Weather can significantly affect our revenue and profitability.



Inclement weather conditions, such as significant storms and unusual temperatures, can impact our ability to perform work. Adverse weather conditions can cause delays and increases in project costs, resulting in variability in our revenue and profitability.



In connection with mergers and acquisitions, we have recorded goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and adversely affect our operating results. Assessing whether impairment has occurred requires us to make significant judgments and assumptions about the future, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and if actual events turn out to be materially less favorable than the judgments we make and the assumptions we use, we may be required to record impairment charges in the future.

We had approximately $635.4 million of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015. We assess these assets for impairment annually, or more often if required. Our assessments involve a number of estimates and assumptions that are inherently subjective, require significant judgment and regard highly uncertain matters that are subject to change. The use of different assumptions or estimates could materially affect the determination as to whether or not an impairment has occurred. In addition, if future events are materially less favorable than what we assumed or estimated in our impairment analysis, we may be required to record impairment charge, which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Our international operations expose us to economic, political and other risks, as well as uncertainty related to U.S. Government funding, which could adversely affect our revenue and earnings. In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.



For the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, we derived approximately $226.3$170.7 million of revenue from our work on projects located outside of the United States. Our international operations expose us to risks inherent in doing business in certain hostile regions outside the United States, including:including political risks; risks of loss due to acts of war; unstable economic, financial and market conditions; potential incompatibility with foreign subcontractors and vendors; foreign currency controls and fluctuations; trade restrictions; logistical challenges; variations in taxes; and changes in labor conditions, labor strikes and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations. Failure to successfully manage risks associated with our international operations could result in higher operating costs than anticipated or could delay or limit our ability to generate revenue and income from construction operations in key international markets.



The U.S. federal government has approved various spending bills for the construction of defense- and diplomacy-related projects and has allocated significant funds to the defense of U.S. interests around the world from the threat of terrorism. The federal government has also approved funds for development in conjunction with the relocation of military personnel into Guam. However, federal government funding levels for construction projects in the Middle East have decreased significantly over the past fewseveral years as the U.S. government has reduced the number of military troops and support personnel in the region. As a result, we have seen a decrease in the number and size of federal government projects available to us in this region. Any decrease in U.S. federal government funding for projects in Guam or in other U.S. Territories or countries in which we are pursuing work may result in project delays or cancellations, which could reduce our revenue and earnings.



Finally, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. While our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, there is no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from circumstances or actions that could result in possible criminal penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment and loss of reputation, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

14


Table of Contents

In connection with mergers and acquisitions, we have recorded goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and adversely affect our operating results. Assessing whether impairment has occurred requires us to make significant judgments and assumptions about the future, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and if actual events turn out to be materially less favorable than the judgments we make and the assumptions we use, we may be required to record impairment charges in the future.

We had approximately $635.4 million of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016. We assess these assets for impairment annually, or more often if required. Our assessments involve a number of estimates and assumptions that are inherently subjective, require significant judgment and regard highly uncertain matters that are subject to change. The use of different assumptions or estimates could materially affect the determination as to whether or not an impairment has occurred. In addition, if future events are less favorable than what we assumed or estimated in our impairment analysis, we may be required to record impairment charge, which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Conflicts of interest may arise involving certain of our directors.



As of December 31, 2015,2016, our chairman and chief executive officer, Ronald N. Tutor, and three trusts controlled by Mr. Tutor (the “Tutor Group”) owned approximately 18% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Under the terms of Mr. Tutor’s employment agreement, he has the right to designate one nominee for election as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors so long as the Tutor Group owns at least 11.25% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. As of the date of this Form 10-K, there are 1110 current directors, one of whom was appointed by Mr. Tutor in November 2013. Mr. Tutor will be able to exert significant influence over the outcome of a range of corporate matters, including significant corporate transactions requiring a shareholder vote, such as a merger or a sale of the Company or its assets. This concentration of ownership and influence in management and Board decision-making also could harm the price of our common stock by, among other things, discouraging a potential acquirer from seeking to acquire shares of our common stock or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company.

  

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS



None.

  

1415

 


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES



We have office facilities and equipment yards in the following locations, which we believe are suitable and adequate for our current needs:















 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Offices

 

Owned or Leased by Tutor Perini

 

Business Segment(s)

Sylmar,Los Angeles (Sylmar), CA

 

Leased

 

Corporate, Civil & CivilSpecialty Contractors

Barricada, Guam

 

Owned

 

Civil

Black River Falls, WI

 

Owned

 

Civil

Evansville, IN

 

Owned

 

Civil

Fort Lauderdale, FL

 

Leased

 

Building & Specialty Contractors

Framingham, MA

 

Owned

 

Building

Gulfport, MS

 

Owned

 

Building

Henderson, NV

 

Owned

 

Building & Specialty Contractors

Houston, TX

 

Owned

 

Specialty Contractors

Jessup, MD

 

Owned

 

Civil

Lakeview Terrace, CA

 

Leased

 

Specialty Contractors

Mount Vernon, NY

 

Leased

 

Specialty Contractors

New Rochelle, NY

 

Owned

 

Civil

Ozone Park, NY

 

Leased

 

Specialty Contractors

Philadelphia, CAPA

 

Leased

 

Building

Redwood City, CA

 

Leased

 

Building



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Equipment Yards

 

Owned or Leased by Tutor Perini

 

Business Segment(s)

Black River Falls, WI

 

Owned

 

Civil

Fontana, CA

 

Leased

 

Civil

Jessup, MD

 

Owned

 

Civil

Lakeview Terrace, CA

 

Leased

 

Specialty Contractors

Peekskill, NY

 

Owned

 

Civil

Stockton, CA

 

Owned

 

Building

  



ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS



Legal Proceedings are set forth in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and are incorporated herein by reference.

  

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES



We do not own or operate any mines; however, we may be considered a  mine operator under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 because we provide construction-related services for customers in the mining industry.  Accordingly, we provide information concerning mine safety violations and other mining regulation matters in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, revenue from mine construction services was $28.3$18.8  million.

  

1516

 


 

Table of Contents

 

PART II.



ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES



Market Information



Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TPC”.“TPC.”  The quarterly market high and low sales prices for our common stock in 20152016 and 20142015 were as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Market Price Range per Common Share:

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

$

26.71 

 

$

20.24 

 

$

30.04 

 

$

21.06 

$

16.64 

 

$

10.16 

 

$

26.71 

 

$

20.24 

June 30

$

24.74 

 

$

20.50 

 

$

32.11 

 

$

26.83 

$

24.17 

 

$

14.35 

 

$

24.74 

 

$

20.50 

September 30

$

21.86 

 

$

14.95 

 

$

32.51 

 

$

26.25 

$

25.98 

 

$

19.80 

 

$

21.86 

 

$

14.95 

December 31

$

19.57 

 

$

15.20 

 

$

29.25 

 

$

20.07 

$

30.20 

 

$

18.05 

 

$

19.57 

 

$

15.20 



Holders



At February 23, 2016,17, 2017, there were 465427 holders of record of our common stock, including holders of record on behalf of an indeterminate number of beneficial owners.



Dividends and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities



Our current debt agreements restrict us from paying dividends or repurchasing stock. Therefore, weWe did not pay dividends or repurchase stock during the year ended December 31, 2015, nor2016;  we do wenot have any immediate plans to do so. Furthermore, our current debt agreements restrict us from paying dividends or repurchasing stock.



Issuance of Unregistered Securities



None.



17


Table of Contents

Performance Graph



The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders on our Common Stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the NYSE Composite Index and the Dow Jones Heavy Construction Index (“DJ Heavy Construction Index”). We selected the DJ Heavy Construction Index because we believe the index reflects the market conditions within the industry in which we primarily operate. The comparison of total return on investment, defined as the change in year-end stock price plus reinvested dividends, for each of the periods assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2011 in each of our Common Stock, the NYSE Composite Index and the DJ Heavy Construction Index, with investment weighted on the basis of market capitalization.

The comparisons in the following graph are based on historical data and are not intended to forecast the possible future performance graph required by this Item 5 is hereby incorporated by reference fromof our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2015.Common Stock.



1618

 


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA



Selected Consolidated Financial Information



The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules inthis Annual Report. The following table presentstables present selected financial data for the last five years. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.











 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands, except per share data)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

 

$

1,335,993 

 

$

985,245 

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

 

$

1,335,993 

Building

 

1,802,535 

 

 

1,503,837 

 

 

1,551,979 

 

 

1,592,441 

 

 

1,928,612 

 

2,069,841 

 

 

1,802,535 

 

 

1,503,837 

 

 

1,551,979 

 

 

1,592,441 

Specialty Contractors

 

1,228,030 

 

 

1,301,328 

 

 

1,182,277 

 

 

1,183,037 

 

 

802,460 

 

1,234,272 

 

 

1,228,030 

 

 

1,301,328 

 

 

1,182,277 

 

 

1,183,037 

Total

 

4,920,472 

 

 

4,492,309 

 

 

4,175,672 

 

 

4,111,471 

 

 

3,716,317 

 

4,973,076 

 

 

4,920,472 

 

 

4,492,309 

 

 

4,175,672 

 

 

4,111,471 

Cost of operations

 

(4,564,219)

 

 

(3,986,867)

 

 

(3,708,768)

 

 

(3,696,339)

 

 

(3,320,976)

 

(4,515,886)

 

 

(4,564,219)

 

 

(3,986,867)

 

 

(3,708,768)

 

 

(3,696,339)

Gross profit

 

356,253 

 

 

505,442 

 

 

466,904 

 

 

415,132 

 

 

395,341 

 

457,190 

 

 

356,253 

 

 

505,442 

 

 

466,904 

 

 

415,132 

General and administrative expenses

 

(250,840)

 

 

(263,752)

 

 

(263,082)

 

 

(260,369)

 

 

(226,965)

 

(255,270)

 

 

(250,840)

 

 

(263,752)

 

 

(263,082)

 

 

(260,369)

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(376,574)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(376,574)

Income (Loss) from construction operations

 

105,413 

 

 

241,690 

 

 

203,822 

 

 

(221,811)

 

 

168,376 

 

201,920 

 

 

105,413 

 

 

241,690 

 

 

203,822 

 

 

(221,811)

Other income (expense), net

 

12,453 

 

 

(9,536)

 

 

(18,575)

 

 

(1,857)

 

 

4,421 

 

6,977 

 

 

13,569 

 

 

(8,217)

 

 

(16,692)

 

 

(234)

Interest expense

 

(44,027)

 

 

(44,716)

 

 

(45,632)

 

 

(44,174)

 

 

(35,750)

 

(59,782)

 

 

(45,143)

 

 

(46,035)

 

 

(47,515)

 

 

(45,797)

Income (Loss) before income taxes

 

73,839 

 

 

187,438 

 

 

139,615 

 

 

(267,842)

 

 

137,047 

 

149,115 

 

 

73,839 

 

 

187,438 

 

 

139,615 

 

 

(267,842)

(Provision) Benefit for income taxes

 

(28,547)

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

(52,319)

 

 

2,442 

 

 

(50,899)

 

(53,293)

 

 

(28,547)

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

(52,319)

 

 

2,442 

Net income (loss)

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)

 

$

86,148 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (Loss) per share of common stock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

0.92 

 

$

2.22 

 

$

1.82 

 

$

(5.59)

 

$

1.82 

$

1.95 

 

$

0.92 

 

$

2.22 

 

$

1.82 

 

$

(5.59)

Diluted (a)

$

0.91 

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

 

$

(5.59)

 

$

1.80 

$

1.92 

 

$

0.91 

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

 

$

(5.59)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

48,981 

 

 

48,562 

 

 

47,851 

 

 

47,470 

 

 

47,226 

 

49,150 

 

 

48,981 

 

 

48,562 

 

 

47,851 

 

 

47,470 

Diluted

 

49,666 

 

 

49,114 

 

 

48,589 

 

 

47,470 

 

 

47,890 

 

49,864 

 

 

49,666 

 

 

49,114 

 

 

48,589 

 

 

47,470 

(a)

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had a decrease of $0.53 inper diluted EPSshare due to unfavorable adjustments on various Five Star Electric projects in the Specialty Contractors segment. In addition, there was a decrease of $0.28 inper diluted EPSshare due to unfavorable adjustments to the estimated cost to complete a Building segment project in New York. The Company’s 2015 results were also impacted by an unfavorable adjustment for an adverse appellate courtlegal decision related to a long-standing litigation matter for whichin the Company, as part of a 2011 Civil segment, acquisition, assumed liability as a minority partner in a joint venture for a project that had already been completed. Thiswhich resulted in a decrease of $0.28 inper diluted EPS. Refer to the Brightwater Matter discussion in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of this item.share. Furthermore, the Company recorded favorable adjustments for a Civil segment runway reconstruction project, which resulted in an increase of $0.16 inper diluted EPSshare in 2015.



The Company's results for the year ended December 31, 2014 included a positive impact related to changes in the estimated recoveries for two Civil segment projects and a Building segment hospitality and gaming project, resulting in a $0.33 increase inper diluted EPS.share.



The Company's diluted EPS during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were positively impacted by $0.18 and $0.16, respectively, because of changes in the estimated recovery for the same hospitality and gaming project.

1719

 


 

Table of Contents

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of and For the Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands, except ratios and percentages)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

$

2,837,756 

 

$

2,608,939 

 

$

2,454,594 

 

$

2,077,680 

 

$

1,971,776 

 

Current liabilities

 

1,518,943 

 

 

1,448,819 

 

 

1,344,447 

 

 

1,288,235 

 

 

1,228,266 

 

Working capital

$

1,318,813 

 

$

1,160,120 

 

$

1,110,147 

 

$

789,445 

 

$

743,510 

 

Current ratio

 

1.87 

 

 

1.80 

 

 

1.83 

 

 

1.61 

 

 

1.61 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

$

477,626 

 

$

523,525 

 

$

527,602 

 

$

498,125 

 

$

485,095 

 

Total assets

 

4,038,620 

 

 

3,861,300 

 

 

3,711,450 

 

 

3,358,663 

 

 

3,246,216 

 

Capitalization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

759,519 

 

 

817,684 

 

 

857,791 

 

 

726,171 

 

 

726,807 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,553,023 

 

 

1,420,227 

 

 

1,365,505 

 

 

1,247,535 

 

 

1,143,864 

 

Total capitalization

$

2,312,542 

 

$

2,237,911 

 

$

2,223,296 

 

$

1,973,706 

 

$

1,870,671 

 

Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization

 

33 

%

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

Ratio of debt to equity

 

0.49 

 

 

0.58 

 

 

0.63 

 

 

0.58 

 

 

0.64 

 

Shareholders' equity per common share

$

31.56 

 

$

28.94 

 

$

28.06 

 

$

25.76 

 

$

24.05 

 

OTHER DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog at year end

$

6,227,137 

 

$

7,465,129 

 

$

7,831,725 

 

$

6,954,287 

 

$

5,603,624 

 

New awards

 

3,735,084 

 

 

4,553,877 

 

 

5,369,747 

 

 

5,526,335 

 

 

3,606,818 

 

Capital expenditures

 

15,743 

 

 

35,912 

 

 

75,829 

 

 

59,049 

 

 

43,402 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

113,336 

 

 

14,072 

 

 

(56,678)

 

 

50,728 

 

 

(67,863)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(18,495)

 

 

(32,415)

 

 

(26,957)

 

 

(43,574)

 

 

(16,855)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(24,190)

 

 

(41,788)

 

 

99,295 

 

 

(55,287)

 

 

48,534 

 



We have changed the presentation of certain items in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 for the following items: (1) Subsequent to the issuance of our 2015 consolidated financial statements we identified that certain immaterial classification adjustments, related to the offsetting of deferred assets and liabilities by tax jurisdiction, were necessary to correct the error in the classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities. See Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details. (2) We early adopted ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (Subtopic 740-10), which requires companies to retrospectively present all deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. (3) During 2016, we retrospectively adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), which requires companies to present in the balance sheet debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. In addition, the amortization of debt discounts is required to be presented as a component of interest expense.

The aggregate impact of the changes discussed above is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of and For the Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands, except ratios and percentages)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

$

2,635,245 

 

$

2,472,556 

 

$

2,085,920 

 

$

1,981,847 

 

$

1,950,034 

 

Current liabilities

 

1,473,708 

 

 

1,358,576 

 

 

1,298,486 

 

 

1,234,270 

 

 

1,393,234 

 

Working capital

$

1,161,537 

 

$

1,113,980 

 

$

787,434 

 

$

747,577 

 

$

556,800 

 

Current ratio

 

1.79 

 

 

1.82 

 

 

1.61 

 

 

1.61 

 

 

1.40 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

$

523,525 

 

$

527,602 

 

$

498,125 

 

$

485,095 

 

$

491,377 

 

Total assets

 

4,042,441 

 

 

3,773,315 

 

 

3,397,438 

 

 

3,296,410 

 

 

3,613,127 

 

Capitalization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

823,448 

 

 

865,359 

 

 

733,884 

 

 

737,090 

 

 

672,507 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,420,227 

 

 

1,365,505 

 

 

1,247,535 

 

 

1,143,864 

 

 

1,399,827 

 

Total capitalization

$

2,243,675 

 

$

2,230,864 

 

$

1,981,419 

 

$

1,880,954 

 

$

2,072,334 

 

Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

 

32 

%

Ratio of debt to equity

 

0.58 

 

 

0.63 

 

 

0.59 

 

 

0.64 

 

 

0.48 

 

Shareholders' equity per common share

$

28.94 

 

$

28.06 

 

$

25.76 

 

$

24.05 

 

$

29.58 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog at year end

$

7,465,129 

 

$

7,831,725 

 

$

6,954,287 

 

$

5,603,624 

 

$

6,108,277 

 

New awards

 

4,553,877 

 

 

5,369,747 

 

 

5,526,335 

 

 

3,606,818 

 

 

5,540,304 

 

Capital expenditures

 

35,912 

 

 

75,829 

 

 

59,049 

 

 

43,402 

 

 

68,351 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

14,072 

 

 

(56,678)

 

 

50,728 

 

 

(67,863)

 

 

(31,620)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(32,415)

 

 

(26,957)

 

 

(43,574)

 

 

(16,855)

 

 

(375,221)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(41,788)

 

 

99,295 

 

 

(55,287)

 

 

48,534 

 

 

139,703 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of and For the Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands, except ratios)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

Other income (expense), net, as previously reported

$

12,453 

 

$

(9,536)

 

$

(18,575)

 

$

(1,857)

Reclass amortization of deferred debt cost to interest expense

 

1,116 

 

 

1,319 

 

 

1,883 

 

 

1,623 

Other income (expense), net, as restated

$

13,569 

 

$

(8,217)

 

$

(16,692)

 

$

(234)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, as previously reported

$

(44,027)

 

$

(44,716)

 

$

(45,632)

 

$

(44,174)

Reclass amortization of deferred debt cost to interest expense

 

(1,116)

 

 

(1,319)

 

 

(1,883)

 

 

(1,623)

Interest expense, as restated

$

(45,143)

 

$

(46,035)

 

$

(47,515)

 

$

(45,797)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current asset, as previously reported

$

2,635,245 

 

$

2,472,556 

 

$

2,085,920 

 

$

1,981,847 

Classification adjustments

 

(24,889)

 

 

(14,129)

 

 

(8,184)

 

 

(6,004)

Reclass current deferred tax assets to non-current deferred tax assets

 

(1,417)

 

 

(3,833)

 

 

(56)

 

 

(4,067)

Current asset, as restated

$

2,608,939 

 

$

2,454,594 

 

$

2,077,680 

 

$

1,971,776 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities, as previously reported

$

1,473,708 

 

$

1,358,576 

 

$

1,298,486 

 

$

1,234,270 

Classification adjustments

 

(24,889)

 

 

(14,129)

 

 

(8,184)

 

 

(6,004)

Reclass current deferred tax liabilities to non-current deferred tax liabilities

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,067)

 

 

 —

Current liabilities, as restated

$

1,448,819 

 

$

1,344,447 

 

$

1,288,235 

 

$

1,228,266 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets, as previously reported

$

4,042,441 

 

$

3,773,315 

 

$

3,397,438 

 

$

3,296,410 

Classification adjustments

 

(173,960)

 

 

(50,754)

 

 

(31,061)

 

 

(35,844)

Reclass non-current deferred tax assets to non-current deferred tax liabilities

 

(1,417)

 

 

(3,543)

 

 

(1)

 

 

(4,067)

Reclass deferred debt cost to long-term debt

 

(5,764)

 

 

(7,568)

 

 

(7,713)

 

 

(10,283)

Total assets, as restated

$

3,861,300 

 

$

3,711,450 

 

$

3,358,663 

 

$

3,246,216 

20


Table of Contents

  

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. For cautions about relying on such forward-looking statements, please refer to the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report immediately prior to Item 1. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report.



Executive OverviewCivil Segment



Consolidated revenueOur Civil segment specializes in public works construction and the replacement and reconstruction of infrastructure across most of the major geographic regions of the United States. Our civil contracting services include construction and rehabilitation of highways, bridges, tunnels, mass-transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities.

The Civil segment is comprised of the Company’s legacy heavy civil construction operations (civil operations of our predecessors, Perini Corporation, Tutor-Saliba and its subsidiary, Black Construction) and the following three companies acquired by the Company in 2011: Frontier-Kemper, Lunda Construction, and Becho. Frontier-Kemper is a heavy civil contractor engaged in the construction of tunnels for 2015 was $4.9 billion comparedhighways, railroads, subways and rapid transit systems; the construction of shafts and other facilities for water supply, wastewater transport and hydroelectric projects; and the development and equipping of mines with innovative hoisting, elevator and vertical conveyance systems. Lunda Construction is a heavy civil contractor engaged in the construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of bridges, railroads and other civil structures throughout the United States. Becho is engaged in drilling, foundation and excavation support for shoring, bridges, piers, roads and highway projects, primarily in the southwestern United States. We believe that the Company has benefitted through these acquisitions by an expanded geographic presence, enhanced civil construction capabilities and the addition of experienced management with proven, successful track records.

Our Civil segment’s customers primarily award contracts through one of two methods: the traditional public “competitive bid” method, in which price is the major determining factor, or through a request for proposals where contracts are awarded based on a combination of technical capability and price.

Traditionally, our Civil segment’s customers require each contractor to $4.5 billionpre-qualify for 2014. This improvement was drivenconstruction business by increased volume in our Buildingmeeting criteria that include technical capabilities and Civil segments, with various buildingfinancial strength. Our financial strength and outstanding record of performance on challenging civil works projects often enable us to pre-qualify for projects in Californiasituations where smaller, less diversified contractors are unable to meet the qualification requirements. We believe this is a competitive advantage that makes us an attractive partner on the largest, most complex infrastructure projects and twoprestigious design-build, or DBOM (design-build-operate-maintain) contracts, which combine the nation’s top contractors with engineering firms, equipment manufacturers and project development consultants in a competitive bid selection process to execute highly sophisticated projects.

In its 2016 rankings, ENR ranked us as the nation’s fourth largest domestic heavy contractor, fourth largest contractor in the transportation market and tenth largest contractor overall.

We believe the Civil segment provides significant opportunities for growth due to the age and condition of existing infrastructure coupled with large mass-transitgovernment funding sources aimed at the replacement and reconstruction of aging U.S. infrastructure and popular, often bipartisan, support from the public and elected officials for infrastructure improvement programs. Funding for major civil infrastructure projects is typically provided through a combination of one or more of the following: local, regional, state and federal loans; grants; other direct allocations sourced through tax revenue; bonds; and user fees.

We have been active in civil construction since 1894 and believe we have a particular expertise in large, complex civil construction projects. We have completed or are currently working on some of the most significant civil construction projects in the United States. For example, we are currently working on various segments of the East Side Access project in New York beingCity; the largest contributors.

Consolidated revenue for 2014 was $4.5 billion compared to $4.2 billion for 2013. This increase was primarily due to higherfirst phase of the California High-Speed Rail project; the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR-99 bored tunnel) project execution activities in our CivilSeattle, Washington; the Third Street Light Rail-Central Subway project in San Francisco, California; the platform over the eastern rail yard and Specialty Contractors segments, including civil projectsthe Amtrak Tunnel at Hudson Yards in New York mass-transitCity; and the rehabilitation of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge in New York. We have also performed runway widening and reconstruction projects at the John F. Kennedy International Airport in California and New York, bridge projects in the Midwest andQueens, New York, and specialty contracting projects oncompleted the East Coast. The increaseNew Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California,  the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California, and express toll lanes along I-95 in Maryland. In January of 2017, a joint-venture team we are leading was partially offset by decreased activity onawarded a $1.4 billion contract for the Purple Line Segment 2 expansion project in Los Angeles, California.

Building Segment

Our Building segment has significant experience providing services to a number of specialized building markets for private and public works customers, including the hospitality and gaming, projects in various states,transportation, health care, projects in California,corporate and tunnel projects onmunicipal offices, sports and entertainment, education, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical, industrial and high-tech markets. We believe the West Coast.

Income from construction operations for 2015 was $105.4 million compared to $241.7 million for 2014. The decrease was primarily due to significant project charges recorded for various Five Star Electric projects in New York in the Specialty Contractors segment, decreased activity on certain higher-margin civil projects, unfavorable adjustments related to the estimate of costs to complete an office building project in New York and the adverse Brightwater litigation-related charge for a legacy civil project (see the Brightwater Matter in Note 7success of the NotesBuilding segment results from our proven ability to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Income from construction operations for 2014 was $241.7 million comparedmanage and perform large, complex projects with aggressive fast-track schedules; elaborate designs; and advanced mechanical, electrical and life safety systems, while providing accurate budgeting and strict quality control. Although price is a key competitive factor, we believe our strong reputation, long-standing customer relationships and significant level of repeat and referral business have enabled us to $203.8 million for 2013. This increase was primarily due to the volume increase that year as discussed above and net favorable adjustments to anticipated recoveries associated with two legal rulings issued in 2014.achieve our leading position.

184

 


 

Table of Contents

 



The effective tax rate was 38.7%,  42.4%Building segment is comprised of several operating units that provide general contracting, design-build, preconstruction and 37.5% for 2015,  2014 and 2013, respectively. The 2015 rate was favorably impacted byconstruction services in various regions of the resolution of certain state tax matters. The 2014 rate was unfavorably impacted by increased activityUnited States. Tutor Perini Building Corp. focuses on large, complex building projects nationwide, including significant projects in higher state tax jurisdictions and higher non‑deductible compensation expense. The 2013 rate was favorably impacted by certain discrete items mainly related to favorable federal and state tax audit settlements.

Earnings per diluted share was $0.91,  $2.20 and $1.80 in 2015,  2014 and 2013, respectively. The primary reasons for the earnings decline in 2015 were the various above-mentioned factors that impacted income from construction operations. The earnings improvement in 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily due to the 2014 consolidated revenue increases discussed above, certain higher-margin civil projects, net favorable adjustments associated with two legal rulings, and favorable adjustments for a large hospitality and gaming, commercial office, education, government facilities, and multi-unit residential markets. Rudolph and Sletten focuses on large, complex projects in California in the commercial office, technology, industrial, education, and government facilities markets. Roy Anderson Corp. provides its services, including disaster rapid response services, to public and private customers primarily throughout the southeastern United States. Perini Management Services provides diversified construction and design-build services to U.S. military and government agencies, as well as to surety companies and multi-national corporations in the United States and locations overseas. We believe that our national resources and strong résumé of notable projects will enable future growth on large, complex building project.projects.



ConsolidatedIn its 2016 rankings, ENR ranked us as the sixth largest domestic building contractor. We are a recognized leader in the hospitality and gaming market, specializing in the construction of high-end resorts and casinos. We work with hotel operators, Native American tribal councils, developers and architectural firms to provide diversified construction services to meet the challenges of new awardsconstruction and renovation of hotel and resort properties. We believe that our reputation for completing projects on time is a significant competitive advantage in 2015this market, as any delay in project completion could result in significant loss of revenue for the customer.

We have recently completed, or are currently working on, large private and public building projects across a wide array of building end markets, including commercial offices, multi-unit residential, health care, hospitality and gaming, transportation, education, and entertainment. Specific projects include a large technology research and development office building in northern California for a confidential technology customer; the Panorama Tower in Miami, Florida; Tower C and Tower D at Hudson Yards in New York City; the Washington Hospital expansion in Fremont, California; the Graton Rancheria Resort and Casino in Rohnert Park, California; the Chumash Casino Resort expansion in Santa Ynez, California; the Scarlet Pearl Casino Resort in D’Iberville, Mississippi; the Broadway Plaza retail development in Walnut Creek, California; Kaiser Hospital Buildings in San Leandro and Redwood City, California; and courthouses in San Bernardino and San Diego, California and Broward County, Florida. As a result of our reputation and track record, we were $4.6 billion compared to $5.4 billionpreviously awarded and completed contracts for several marquee projects in 2014the hospitality and $5.5 billiongaming market, including the Resorts World New York Casino in 2013. Jamaica, New York, and CityCenter, the Cosmopolitan Resort and Casino, the Wynn Encore Hotel and Planet Hollywood, all in Las Vegas, Nevada. These projects span a wide array of building end markets and illustrate our Building segment’s résumé of successfully completed large-scale public and private projects.

Specialty Contractors Segment

Our Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems and pneumatically placed concrete for a full range of civil and building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass-transit end markets. This segment provides the Company with unique strengths and capabilities that position us as a full-service contractor with greater control over scheduled work, project delivery and risk management.

The BuildingSpecialty Contractors segment wasis comprised of several operating units that provide unique services in various regions of the United States. Five Star Electric is the largest electrical contractor in New York City, providing construction services in the electrical sector, including power, lighting, fire alarm, security, telecommunications, low voltage and wireless systems. Five Star Electric has established itself as an industry leader performing work in both the public and private sectors, including high-end residential, hotel and commercial towers, transportation, water treatment plants, schools and universities, health care, retail, sports and government facilities. Fisk Electric covers many of the major contributor of new awards during 2015. New awardscommercial, transportation and industrial electrical construction markets in 2014 were generally balanced across all three segments,the southwestern and southeastern United States, with the Building segment contributingability to cover other attractive markets nationwide. Fisk’s expertise is in technology design and the development of electrical and technology systems for major projects spanning a modestly higher volume. The Civil segment wasbroad variety of project types, including commercial office buildings, sports arenas, hospitals, research laboratories, hotels and casinos, convention centers, manufacturing plants, refineries and water and wastewater treatment facilities. WDF, Nagelbush and Desert Mechanical each provide mechanical, plumbing, HVAC and fire protection services to a range of customers in a wide variety of markets, including transportation, commercial/industrial, schools and universities and residential. WDF is one of the dominant contributor of new awards during 2013.largest mechanical contractors servicing the New York City metropolitan region, Nagelbush operates primarily in Florida, and Desert Mechanical operates primarily in the western United States. Superior Gunite specializes in pneumatically placed structural concrete utilized in infrastructure projects nationwide, such as bridges, dams, tunnels and retaining walls.



Consolidated backlog was $7.5 billion, $7.8 billionIn its 2016 rankings, ENR ranked us as the fifth largest electrical contractor1, eleventh largest mechanical contractor and $7.0 billion as of December 31, 2015,  2014 and 2013, respectively. The strong backlog at the end of 2015 was primarily due to significant new awardstenth largest specialty contractor1 in the Building segment, partially offset byUnited States. Through Five Star Electric and WDF, collectively, we are also the work off of backlog outpacing new awardslargest specialty contractor in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments. As of December 31, 2015, the mix of backlog by segment was approximately 37%,  37% and 26% for the Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors segments, respectively. The increased backlog at the end of 2014 was the result of significant new awards that outpaced revenue across all segments.

Projects in the Civil segment’s backlog typically convert to revenue over a period of three to five years, whereas projects for the Building and Specialty Contractors segments typically convert to revenue over a period of one to three years. We estimate that approximately $4.4 billion, or 59% of our backlog as of December 31, 2015 will be recognized as revenue in 2016.New York City metropolitan area.







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog at

 

New Awards

 

Revenue Recognized

 

Backlog at

(in millions)

December 31, 2014

 

in 2015 (a)

 

in 2015

 

December 31, 2015

Civil

$

3,563.2 

 

$

1,070.4 

 

$

(1,889.9)

 

$

2,743.7 

Building

 

2,187.8 

 

 

2,395.1 

 

 

(1,802.5)

 

 

2,780.4 

Specialty Contractors

 

2,080.7 

 

 

1,088.4 

 

 

(1,228.1)

 

 

1,941.0 

Total

$

7,831.7 

 

$

4,553.9 

 

$

(4,920.5)

 

$

7,465.1 

(a)

New awards  consist of the original contract price of projects added to our backlog plus or minus subsequent changes to the estimated total contract price of existing contracts.



In addition to our existing backlog, as of December 31, 2015, we had approximately $3.6 billion of pending contract awards, including up to $1.5 billion in total construction value to be managed for various future phases1This ranking represents the collective revenue of the Hudson Yards project, $663 million for a large mass-transit project in New York (that was subsequently awarded in January 2016), approximately $845 million for seven building projects in California and approximately $300 million for two building projects in Florida (one of which was also subsequently awarded in January 2016). We expectCompany’s specialty contracting subsidiaries as reported to be awarded many of these projects in 2016.

The outlook is favorable for our Company’s growth over the next several years. In addition to our large volume of backlog and pending awards, we expect significant new award activity based on long-term capital spending plans by various state, local and federal customers, favorable budget trends and typically bipartisan support for infrastructure investments. For example, the recently enacted $305-billion Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, the first long-term transportation funding bill in the past 10 years, is expected to provide state and local agencies with federal funding for numerous highway, bridge and mass-transit projects for 2016 through 2020. In addition, several very large, long-duration civil infrastructure programs with which we are already involved are progressing, such as California’s High-Speed Rail system and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s East Side Access project. Planning and early projects are also underway related to Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor Improvements, including the Gateway Program, which will eventually bring new rail tunnels beneath the Hudson River to connect service between New Jersey and New York’s Penn Station. Finally, sustained low interest rates and capital costs are expected to drive high demand and continued spending by private and public customers on building infrastructure projects.

For a more detailed discussion of operating performance of each business segment, corporate general and administrative expense and other items, see “Results of Segment Operations” and “Corporate, Tax and Other Matters” below.

ENR.

195

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Non-GAAP Measures

We have recently completed, or are currently working on, various electrical and mechanical projects at the World Trade Center and at Hudson Yards in New York City, two signal system modernization projects in New York City and electrical work for the new hospital at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. This segment has supported, or is currently supporting, several large projects in our Building and Civil segments, including the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR-99 bored tunnel) project in Seattle, Washington; the McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas, Nevada; the Resorts World New York Casino in Jamaica, New York; various segments of the Greenwich Street Corridor and East Side Access projects in New York City; the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California; the New Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California; and several marquee projects in the hospitality and gaming market, including CityCenter, the Cosmopolitan Resort and Casino and Planet Hollywood, all in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The majority of work performed by our Specialty Contractors units is contracted directly with state and local municipal agencies, real estate developers, general contractors, commercial and industrial customers and school districts; additionally, a smaller, but growing, component of its work is performed as a subcontractor to the our Building and Civil segments.

Markets and Customers

We provide diversified construction services to a variety of end markets and customers. The following tables set forth certain reportable segment information relating to the Company’s operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue by Business Segment

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Civil

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

Building

 

2,069,841 

 

 

1,802,535 

 

 

1,503,837 

Specialty Contractors

 

1,234,272 

 

 

1,228,030 

 

 

1,301,328 

Total

$

4,973,076 

 

$

4,920,472 

 

$

4,492,309 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Mass Transit

$

547,913 

 

$

450,436 

 

$

534,110 

Bridges

 

533,762 

 

 

662,553 

 

 

535,733 

Highways

 

290,745 

 

 

388,963 

 

 

156,443 

Other

 

296,543 

 

 

387,955 

 

 

460,858 

Total

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Office

$

441,591 

 

$

226,928 

 

$

2,722 

Industrial and Commercial

 

271,480 

 

 

266,921 

 

 

90,194 

Municipal and Government

 

262,022 

 

 

335,762 

 

 

300,274 

Health Care Facilities

 

235,005 

 

 

164,963 

 

 

127,963 

Hospitality and Gaming

 

216,224 

 

 

250,757 

 

 

101,819 

Condominiums

 

193,755 

 

 

125,949 

 

 

115,251 

Mixed Use

 

163,454 

 

 

112,737 

 

 

159,083 

Education Facilities

 

157,808 

 

 

186,944 

 

 

337,062 

Other

 

128,502 

 

 

131,574 

 

 

269,469 

Total

$

2,069,841 

 

$

1,802,535 

 

$

1,503,837 

6


Table of Contents



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Contractors Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Condominiums

$

239,937 

 

$

266,648 

 

$

105,670 

Mass Transit

 

204,398 

 

 

107,120 

 

 

217,318 

Industrial and Commercial

 

186,769 

 

 

164,480 

 

 

276,008 

Transportation

 

164,468 

 

 

149,971 

 

 

61,288 

Mixed Use

 

159,286 

 

 

96,072 

 

 

36,008 

Education Facilities

 

80,476 

 

 

195,647 

 

 

230,645 

Health Care Facilities

 

60,233 

 

 

40,228 

 

 

30,591 

Wastewater Treatment

 

58,479 

 

 

73,094 

 

 

69,000 

Other

 

80,226 

 

 

134,770 

 

 

274,800 

Total

$

1,234,272 

 

$

1,228,030 

 

$

1,301,328 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue by Customer Type

Year Ended December 31,



2016

 

2015

 

2014

State and Local Agencies

49 

%

 

55 

%

 

56 

%

Private Owners

45 

%

 

40 

%

 

40 

%

Federal Agencies

%

 

%

 

%

Total

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

State and Local Agencies. Our state and local government customers include state transportation departments, metropolitan authorities, cities, municipal agencies, school districts and public universities. We provide services to our state and local customers primarily pursuant to contracts awarded through competitive bidding processes. Our building construction services for state and local government customers have included judicial and correctional facilities, schools and dormitories, health care facilities, convention centers, parking structures and other municipal buildings. The vast majority of our civil contracting and building construction services are provided in locations throughout the United States and its territories.

Private Owners. Our private customers include real estate developers, health care companies, technology companies, hospitality and gaming resort owners, Native American sovereign nations, public corporations and private universities. We provide services to our private customers through negotiated contract arrangements, as well as through competitive bids.

Federal Agencies. Our federal government customers include the U.S. State Department, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Air Force and the National Park Service. We provide services to federal agencies primarily pursuant to contracts for specific or multi-year assignments that involve new construction or infrastructure repairs or improvements. A portion of our revenue from federal agencies is derived from projects in overseas locations, which we expect to continue for the foreseeable future as a result of our experience and strong relationships with federal agencies, together with anticipated expenditures for defense, diplomatic and security-related construction work.

Most federal, state and local government contracts contain provisions that permit the termination of contracts, in whole or in part, for the convenience of the government, among other reasons.

For additional information on revenue and total assets by geographic location, see Note 10of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7


Table of Contents

Backlog

Backlog in our industry is a measure of the total value of work that is remaining to be performed on contracts awarded. We include a construction project in our backlog when a contract is awarded or a letter of commitment is obtained and we believe adequate funding is in place. As a result, we believe our backlog is firm, and although cancellations or scope adjustments may occur, historically they have not been material. Our backlog by segment, end market and customer type is presented in the following tables:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog by Business Segment

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Civil

$

2,672,126 

 

43 

%

 

$

2,743,708 

 

37 

%

Building

 

1,981,193 

 

32 

%

 

 

2,780,440 

 

37 

%

Specialty Contractors

 

1,573,818 

 

25 

%

 

 

1,940,981 

 

26 

%

Total

$

6,227,137 

 

100 

%

 

$

7,465,129 

 

100 

%

We estimate that approximately $3.4 billion, or 54%, of our backlog as of December 31, 2016 will be recognized as revenue in 2017.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Backlog by End Market

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Mass Transit

$

1,853,117 

 

69 

%

 

$

1,455,194 

 

53 

%

Highways

 

379,630 

 

14 

%

 

 

505,998 

 

18 

%

Bridges

 

297,810 

 

11 

%

 

 

497,702 

 

18 

%

Other

 

141,569 

 

%

 

 

284,814 

 

11 

%

Total

$

2,672,126 

 

100 

%

 

$

2,743,708 

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Segment Backlog by End Market

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Hospitality and Gaming

$

517,017 

 

26 

%

 

$

67,530 

 

%

Office

 

342,034 

 

17 

%

 

 

722,582 

 

26 

%

Mixed Use

 

249,088 

 

13 

%

 

 

340,086 

 

12 

%

Municipal and Government

 

206,164 

 

10 

%

 

 

337,273 

 

12 

%

Health Care Facilities

 

192,280 

 

10 

%

 

 

333,759 

 

12 

%

Condominiums

 

169,366 

 

%

 

 

352,251 

 

13 

%

Education Facilities

 

168,634 

 

%

 

 

233,414 

 

%

Industrial and Commercial

 

74,787 

 

%

 

 

250,511 

 

%

Other

 

61,823 

 

%

 

 

143,034 

 

%

Total

$

1,981,193 

 

100 

%

 

$

2,780,440 

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Contractors Segment Backlog by End Market

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Mass Transit

$

612,688 

 

39 

%

 

$

596,455 

 

31 

%

Mixed Use

 

239,763 

 

15 

%

 

 

262,941 

 

14 

%

Condominiums

 

153,354 

 

10 

%

 

 

272,061 

 

14 

%

Industrial and Commercial

 

130,028 

 

%

 

 

180,957 

 

%

Transportation

 

105,990 

 

%

 

 

228,536 

 

12 

%

Health Care Facilities

 

101,494 

 

%

 

 

47,862 

 

%

Education Facilities

 

83,897 

 

%

 

 

93,752 

 

%

Other

 

146,604 

 

10 

%

 

 

258,417 

 

13 

%

Total

$

1,573,818 

 

100 

%

 

$

1,940,981 

 

100 

%

8


Table of Contents



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Backlog by Customer Type

As of December 31,



2016

 

2015

State and Local Agencies

57 

%

 

55 

%

Private Owners

36 

%

 

38 

%

Federal Agencies

%

 

%

Total

100 

%

 

100 

%

Types of Contracts

The contracting and management services we provide consist of planning and scheduling the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for the timely completion of a project in accordance with the terms, plans and specifications contained in a construction contract. We provide these services by entering into traditional contracting arrangements as follows:

·

Fixed price or lump-sum contracts are most commonly used for projects in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments and generally commit the Company to provide all of the resources required to complete a project for a fixed sum. Usually, fixed price contracts transfer more risk to the Company, but offer the opportunity for greater profits.

·

Guaranteed maximum price (“GMP”) contracts provide for a cost plus fee arrangement up to a maximum agreed upon price. These contracts place risks on the Company for amounts in excess of the GMP, but may permit an opportunity for greater profits than under cost plus fee contracts through sharing agreements with the owner on any cost savings that may be realized. Services provided by our Building segment to various private customers are often performed under GMP contracts.

·

Unit price contracts are most prevalent for projects in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments and generally commit the Company to provide an undetermined number of units or components that comprise a project at a fixed price per unit. This approach shifts the risk of estimating the quantity of units required to the project owner, but the risk of increased cost per unit is borne by the Company, unless otherwise allowed for in the contract.

·

Cost plus fee contracts are used for many projects in the Building and Specialty Contractors segments. Cost plus fee contracts include cost plus fixed fee contracts and cost plus award fee contracts. Cost plus fixed fee contracts provide for reimbursement of approved project costs plus a fixed fee. Cost plus award fee contracts provide for reimbursement of the project costs plus a base fee, as well as an incentive fee based on cost and/or schedule performance. Cost plus fee contracts serve to minimize the Company’s financial risk, but may also limit profits.

Fixed price contracts account for a substantial portion of our revenue and are expected to continue to represent a sizeable percentage of both total revenue and backlog. The composition of revenue and backlog by type of contract for 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

Revenue

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Fixed price

47 

%

 

44 

%

 

60 

%

Guaranteed maximum price

28 

%

 

32 

%

 

24 

%

Unit price

11 

%

 

12 

%

 

%

Cost plus fee and other

14 

%

 

12 

%

 

%



100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

Backlog

2016

 

2015

Fixed price

63 

%

 

55 

%

Guaranteed maximum price

21 

%

 

22 

%

Unit price

%

 

%

Cost plus fee and other

10 

%

 

16 

%



100 

%

 

100 

%

9


Table of Contents

Competition

The markets in which we compete include numerous competitors. In the small to mid-sized work that we have targeted, we have continued to experience strong pricing competition from our competitors. Much of the work that we target, however, is for larger, more complex projects where there are fewer active market participants because of the enhanced capabilities and resources required to perform the work. As a result, on these larger projects we typically face fewer competitors. Despite this, over the past two years we have seen increased competition especially from foreign competitors that have been pursuing major projects in the United States due to the relatively larger size and significant number of U.S. opportunities. We anticipate that the increased level of foreign competition will persist for the foreseeable future.

In our Civil segment, we compete principally with large civil construction firms, including (alphabetically) Dragados USA; Fluor Corporation; Granite Construction; Kiewit Corporation; Skanska USA; Traylor Bros., Inc.; and The Walsh Group. In our Building segment, we compete with a variety of national and regional contractors. Our primary competitors are (alphabetically) AECOM (through its acquisitions of Tishman Construction and Hunt Construction Group); Balfour Beatty Construction; Clark Construction Group; DPR Construction; Gilbane, Inc.; Hensel Phelps Construction Co.; McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.; Skanska USA; Suffolk Construction; and Turner Construction Company. In our Specialty Contractors segment, we compete principally with various regional and local electrical, mechanical and plumbing subcontractors. We believe price, experience, reputation, responsiveness, customer relationships, project completion track record, schedule control, risk management and quality of work are key factors customers consider when awarding contracts.

Construction Costs

If prices for materials, labor or equipment increase excessively, provisions in certain types of contracts often shift all or a major portion of any adverse impact to the customer. In our fixed price contracts, we attempt to insulate ourselves from the unfavorable effects of inflation, when possible, by incorporating escalating wage and price assumptions into our construction cost estimates, by obtaining firm fixed price quotes from major subcontractors and material suppliers, and by purchasing required materials early in the project schedule. Construction and other materials used in our construction activities are generally available locally from multiple sources and have been in adequate supply during recent years. Labor resources for our domestic projects are largely obtained through various labor unions with which we are associated. We have not experienced significant labor shortages in recent years, nor do we expect to in the future. We employ expatriate and local labor in selected overseas areas.

Environmental Matters



Our consolidated financial statementsproperties and operations are presented basedsubject to federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including requirements for water discharges; air emissions; the use, management and disposal of solid or hazardous materials or wastes; and the cleanup of contamination. In certain circumstances, we may also be required to hire subcontractors to dispose of hazardous materials encountered on GAAP.a project in accordance with a plan approved in advance by the owner. We sometimes use non-GAAP measuresbelieve that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, and we continually evaluate whether we must take additional steps to ensure compliance with those laws and regulations. However, future requirements or amendments to current laws or regulations imposing more stringent requirements could require us to incur additional costs to maintain or achieve compliance.

In addition, some environmental laws, such as the U.S. federal “Superfund” law and similar state statutes, can impose liability for the entire cost of incomecleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former owners or operators or upon parties who generated waste at, or sent waste to, these sites, regardless of who owned the site at the time of the release or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity. Contaminants have been detected at some of the sites that we own and where we have worked as a contractor in the past, and we have incurred costs for the investigation and remediation of hazardous substances. We believe that our liabilities for these sites are not material, either individually or in the aggregate. We have pollution liability insurance coverage for such matters, and we receive indemnification from operations, net income, EPScustomers to cover the risks associated with environmental remediation.

Insurance and other measuresBonding

All of our properties and equipment, as well as those of our joint ventures, are covered by insurance in amounts that we believe are appropriateconsistent with our risk of loss and industry practice. Our wholly owned subsidiary, PCR Insurance Company, issues deductible reimbursement policies for subcontractor default insurance, auto liability, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance, allowing us to enhancecentralize our claims and risk management functions to reduce our insurance-related costs.

As a normal part of the construction business, we are often required to provide various types of surety bonds as an overall understandingadditional level of security of our historical financial performanceperformance. We also require many of our higher-risk subcontractors to provide surety bonds as security for payment of subcontractors and future prospects. We are providingsuppliers and to guarantee their performance. As an alternative to traditional surety bonds, we also have purchased subcontractor default insurance for certain construction projects to insure against the below non-GAAP measures to disclose additional information to facilitaterisk of subcontractor default.

10


Table of Contents

Employees

The number of our employees varies based on the comparisonnumber of pastactive projects, the type and present operations, as they are among the indicators that management uses as a basis for evaluating the Company’s financial performance,magnitude of those projects, as well as our position within the lifecycle of those projects. Our total number of employees as of December 31, 2016 was 11,603.  

We are signatory to numerous local and regional collective bargaining agreements, both directly and through trade associations, as a union contractor. These agreements cover all necessary union crafts and are subject to various renewal dates. Estimated amounts for forecastingwage escalation related to the expiration of union contracts are included in our bids on various projects; accordingly, the expiration of any union contract in the next year is not expected to have any material impact on us. During the past several years, we have not experienced any significant work stoppages caused by our union employees.

Financial information about geographic areas is discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading “Geographic Information.”

Available Information

Our website address is www.tutorperini.com. In the ‘‘Investor Relations’’ portion of our website, under “Financial Reports,” subsection “SEC Filings,” you may obtain free electronic copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, as well as reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act of transactions in our stock by our directors and executive officers. These reports are made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports, and any amendments to them, are also available at the Internet website of the SEC, www.sec.gov. The public may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. In order to obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room, you may call 1-800-732-0330. We also maintain various documents, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of the Committees of our Board of Directors in the “Corporate Governance” portion of our website.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

We are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Set forth below, and elsewhere in this report, are descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

A significant slowdown or decline in economic conditions could adversely affect our operations.

Any significant decline in economic conditions in any of the markets we serve or uncertainty regarding the economic outlook, could result in a decline in demand for infrastructure projects and commercial building developments. In addition, any instability in the financial and credit markets could negatively impact our customers’ ability to pay us on a timely basis, or at all, for work on projects already under construction, could cause our customers to delay or cancel construction projects in our backlog or could create difficulties for customers to obtain adequate financing to fund new construction projects. Such consequences could have an adverse impact on our future periods. operating results. Lastly, we are more susceptible to adverse economic conditions in New York and California, as a significant portion of our operations are concentrated in those states.

If we are unable to accurately estimate the overall risks, revenue or costs on a contract, we may achieve a lower than anticipated profit or incur a loss on that contract.

Accounting for contract related revenue and costs requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that may change significantly throughout the project lifecycle, resulting in a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. In addition, cost overruns on fixed price and GMP contracts may result in lower profits or losses.

Our contracts require us to perform extra, or change order, work, which can result in disputes or claims and adversely affect our working capital, profits and cash flows.

Our contracts generally require us to perform extra, or change order, work as directed by the customer even if the customer has not agreed in advance on the scope or price of the work to be performed. This process may result in disputes or claims over whether the work performed is beyond the scope of work directed by the customer and/or exceeds the price the customer is willing to pay for the work performed. To the extent we do not recover our costs for this work or there are delays in the recovery of these costs, our cash flows and working capital could be adversely impacted.

11


Table of Contents

We are subject to significant legal proceedings which, if determined adversely to us, could harm our reputation, preclude us from bidding on future projects and/or have a material effect on us. We also may invest significant working capital on projects while legal proceedings are being settled.

We are involved in various lawsuits, including the legal proceedings described under Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Litigation is inherently uncertain, and it is not possible to accurately predict what the final outcome will be of any legal proceeding. We must make certain assumptions and rely on estimates, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, regarding potential outcomes of legal proceedings in order to determine an appropriate contingent liability and charge to income. Any result that is materially different than our estimates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, any adverse judgments could harm our reputation and preclude us from bidding on future projects.

We occasionally bring claims against project owners for additional cost exceeding the contract price or for amounts not included in the original contract price. When these types of events occur and unresolved claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of claims could have a material effect on our liquidity and financial results.

Competition for new project awards is intense, and our failure to compete effectively could reduce our market share and profits.

New project awards are determined through either a competitive bid basis or on a negotiated basis. Projects are generally awarded based upon price but often take into account other factors, such as technical approach and qualifications, duration of project execution and past performance on similar projects completed. Within our industry, we compete with many international, regional and local construction firms. Some of these competitors have achieved greater market penetration than we have in the markets in which we compete, and some have greater resources than we do. If we are unable to compete successfully in such markets, our relative market share and profits could be reduced.

We may not fully realize the revenue value reported in our backlog due to cancellations or reductions in scope.

As of December 31, 2016, our backlog of uncompleted construction work was approximately $6.2 billion. The revenue projected in our backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits. For example, the cancellation or reduction in scope of any project in our backlog could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our debt agreements.

We currently have, and expect to continue to have, a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2016, we had total debt of $759.5 million. If we are unable to meet the terms of the financial covenants or fail to comply with any of the other restrictions contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness, an event of default could occur, causing the debt related to such agreement to become immediately due. If such acceleration occurs, we may not be able to repay such indebtedness as required. Since indebtedness under our Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of our assets, acceleration of this debt could result in foreclosure of those assets and a negative impact on our operations. In addition, a failure to meet the terms of our Credit Agreement could result in a reduction of future borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement, causing a loss of liquidity. A loss of liquidity could adversely impact our ability to execute projects in our backlog, obtain new projects, engage subcontractors, and attract and retain key employees.

Our actual results could differ from the assumptions and estimates used to prepare our financial statements.

In preparing our financial statements, we are required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) to make estimates and assumptions as of the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring significant estimates by our management believes that these non-GAAP measures can be useful in measuring operating performance and should be considered by investors, prospective investors and others. These non-GAAP measuresinclude, but are not intendedlimited to:

• recognition of contract revenue, costs, profits or losses in applying the principles of percentage-of-completion accounting;

• recognition of revenue related to replaceproject incentives or awards we expect to receive;

• recognition of recoveries under contract change orders or claims;

• estimated amounts for expected project losses, warranty costs, contract close-out or other costs;

• collectability of billed and unbilled accounts receivable;

• asset valuations;

• income tax provisions and related valuation allowances;

12


Table of Contents

• determination of expense and potential liabilities under pension and other post-retirement benefit programs; and

• accruals for other estimated liabilities, including litigation and insurance revenue/reserves.

Our actual business and financial results could differ from our estimates of such results, which could have a material negative impact on our financial condition and reported results of operations.

The level of federal, state and local government spending for infrastructure and other public projects could adversely affect the presentationnumber of projects available to us in the future.

The civil construction and public-works building markets are dependent on the amount of work funded by various government agencies, which depends on many factors, including the condition of the existing infrastructure and buildings; the need for new or expanded infrastructure and buildings; and federal, state and local government spending levels. As a result, our future operating results could be negatively impacted by any decrease in demand for public projects or decrease or delay in government funding, which could result from a variety of factors, including delays in the sale of voter-approved bonds, budget shortfalls, credit rating downgrades or long-term impairment in the ability of state and local governments to raise capital in the municipal bond market.

The construction services industry is highly schedule driven, and our failure to meet the schedule requirements of our contracts could adversely affect our reputation and/or expose us to financial liability.

Many of our contracts are subject to specific completion schedule requirements. Any failure to meet contractual schedule requirements could subject us to liquidated damages, liability for our customer’s actual cost arising out of our delay and damage to our reputation.

We require substantial personnel, including construction and project managers and specialty subcontractor resources to execute and perform our contracts in backlog. The successful execution of our business strategies is also dependent upon our ability to attract, retain and implement succession plans for key officers.

Our ability to execute and perform on our contracts in backlog depends in large part upon our ability to hire and retain highly skilled personnel, including project and construction management and trade labor resources, such as carpenters, masons and other skilled workers. In the event we are unable to attract, hire and retain the requisite personnel and subcontractors necessary to execute and perform our backlog, we may experience delays in completing projects in accordance with project schedules or an increase in expected costs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, in accordance with U. S. GAAP,our reputation and they should be considered inour relationships. In addition, if we lack the personnel and specialty subcontractors necessary to and not in lieuperform on our current contract backlog, we may find it necessary to curtail our pursuit of our GAAP results. The non-GAAP measures that we provide may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.new projects.



The following table presentsexecution of our business strategies also substantially depends on our ability to retain several key members of our management. Losing any of these individuals could adversely affect our business. The majority of these key officers are not bound by employment agreements. Volatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key staff to whom we have provided share-based compensation. Additionally, because a reconciliationsubstantial portion of reported incomeour key executives' compensation is placed "at risk" and linked to the performance of our business, when our operating results are negatively impacted, we are at greater risk of employee turnover. If we lose our existing key executives and are unable to execute a succession plan our operating results would likely be harmed.

Systems and information technology interruption and breaches in data security could adversely impact our ability to operate and negatively impact our operating results.

We are reliant on computer and other information technology that could be interrupted or damaged by a variety of factors including, but not limited to, cyber-attacks, natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, acts of war, computer viruses and physical damage. The resulting consequences could include a loss of critical data, a delay in operations or an unintentional disclosure of confidential information, any of which could have a material impact to our Company and its consolidated financial statements.

Our participation in construction joint ventures exposes us to liability and/or harm to our reputation for failures by our partners.

As part of our business, we enter into joint venture arrangements typically to jointly bid on and execute particular projects, thereby reducing our risk profile while enhancing the execution capability and financial reward of project teams. Success on these joint projects depends in large part on whether our joint-venture partners satisfy their contractual obligations. We and our joint-venture partners are generally jointly and severally liable for all liabilities and obligations of our joint ventures. If a joint venture partner fails to perform or is financially unable to bear its portion of required capital contributions or other obligations, including liabilities stemming from constructionlawsuits, we could be required to make additional investments, provide additional services or pay more than our proportionate share of a liability to make up for our partner’s shortfall. Further, if we are unable to adequately address our partner’s

13


Table of Contents

performance issues, the customer may terminate the project, which could result in legal liability to us, harm our reputation, reduce our profit on a project or, in some cases, result in a loss.

We are subject to a number of risks as a U.S. government contractor, which could harm our reputation, result in fines or penalties against us and/or adversely impact our financial condition.

Failure to comply with laws and regulations related to government contracts could result in contract termination, suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. government, civil fines and criminal prosecution, any of which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and future financial condition and performance.

Conversion of our outstanding Convertible Notes could dilute ownership interests of existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Based on the terms of the indenture for the Convertible Notes, we may redeem the Convertible Notes in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of the two. As a result, a conversion of some or all of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of our common stock issuable upon such conversion of the Convertible Notes could cause the price of our common stock to decline. In addition, the existence of the Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because a conversion of the Convertible Notes could depress the price of our common stock.

We may need to include the potential dilutive impact of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation.

We currently intend to pay the principal amount of our Convertible Notes in cash; therefore, we have not included the potential dilutive effect of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculations. If, however, there is a change in future circumstances as a result of a decline in our projected cash flow or for other reasons, we may conclude at such time that it will be preferable to use shares to satisfy the Convertible Notes. Such a change in our intentions would result in the inclusion of the potential dilutive impact of the Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation, which would result in a decrease in our diluted earnings per share. 

Weather can significantly affect our revenue and profitability.

Inclement weather conditions, such as significant storms and unusual temperatures, can impact our ability to perform work. Adverse weather conditions can cause delays and increases in project costs, resulting in variability in our revenue and profitability.

Our international operations under GAAPexpose us to adjusted income from construction operations foreconomic, political and other risks, as well as uncertainty related to U.S. Government funding, which could adversely affect our revenue and earnings. In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

For the year ended December 31, 2015.2016, we derived approximately $170.7 million of revenue from our work on projects located outside of the United States. Our international operations expose us to risks inherent in doing business in certain hostile regions outside the United States, including political risks; risks of loss due to acts of war; unstable economic, financial and market conditions; potential incompatibility with foreign subcontractors and vendors; foreign currency controls and fluctuations; trade restrictions; logistical challenges; variations in taxes; and changes in labor conditions, labor strikes and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations. Failure to successfully manage risks associated with our international operations could result in higher operating costs than anticipated or could delay or limit our ability to generate revenue and income from construction operations in key international markets.

The U.S. federal government has approved various spending bills for the construction of defense- and diplomacy-related projects and has allocated significant funds to the defense of U.S. interests around the world from the threat of terrorism. The federal government has also approved funds for development in conjunction with the relocation of military personnel into Guam. However, federal government funding levels for construction projects in the Middle East have decreased significantly over the past several years as the U.S. government has reduced the number of military troops and support personnel in the region. As a result, we have seen a decrease in the number and size of federal government projects available to us in this region. Any decrease in U.S. federal government funding for projects in Guam or in other U.S. Territories or countries in which we are pursuing work may result in project delays or cancellations, which could reduce our revenue and earnings.

Finally, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. While our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, there is no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from circumstances or actions that could result in possible criminal penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment and loss of reputation, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

14


Table of Contents

In connection with mergers and acquisitions, we have recorded goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and adversely affect our operating results. Assessing whether impairment has occurred requires us to make significant judgments and assumptions about the future, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and if actual events turn out to be materially less favorable than the judgments we make and the assumptions we use, we may be required to record impairment charges in the future.

We had approximately $635.4 million of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016. We assess these assets for impairment annually, or more often if required. Our assessments involve a number of estimates and assumptions that are inherently subjective, require significant judgment and regard highly uncertain matters that are subject to change. The use of different assumptions or estimates could materially affect the determination as to whether or not an impairment has occurred. In addition, if future events are less favorable than what we assumed or estimated in our impairment analysis, we may be required to record impairment charge, which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Conflicts of interest may arise involving certain of our directors.

As of December 31, 2016, our chairman and chief executive officer, Ronald N. Tutor, and three trusts controlled by Mr. Tutor (the “Tutor Group”) owned approximately 18% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Under the terms of Mr. Tutor’s employment agreement, he has the right to designate one nominee for election as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors so long as the Tutor Group owns at least 11.25% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. As of the date of this Form 10-K, there are 10 current directors, one of whom was appointed by Mr. Tutor in November 2013. Mr. Tutor will be able to exert significant influence over the outcome of a range of corporate matters, including significant corporate transactions requiring a shareholder vote, such as a merger or a sale of the Company or its assets. This concentration of ownership and influence in management and Board decision-making also could harm the price of our common stock by, among other things, discouraging a potential acquirer from seeking to acquire shares of our common stock or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

15


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We have office facilities and equipment yards in the following locations, which we believe are suitable and adequate for our current needs:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reportable Segments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

(in thousands)

 

Civil

 

 

Building

 

Contractors

 

Totals

 

Corporate

 

Total

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from construction operations, as reported

 

$

145,213 

 

$

(1,240)

 

$

15,682 

 

$

159,655 

 

$

(54,242)

 

$

105,413 

Litigation-related charge (a)

 

 

23,860 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

23,860 

 

 

 —

 

 

23,860 

Adjusted income from construction operations

 

$

169,073 

 

$

(1,240)

 

$

15,682 

 

$

183,515 

 

$

(54,242)

 

$

129,273 


(a)

The Company recorded a non-cash, pre-tax charge of $23.9 million ($13.8 million after tax) for an adverse appellate court decision related to a long-standing litigation matter for which the Company, as part of an acquisition in 2011,  assumed liability as a minority partner in a joint venture for a project that had already been completed. (For further information, refer to the Brightwater Matter discussion in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.)



The following table presents a reconciliation of reported net income and reported diluted EPS under GAAP to adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2015.





 

 

 



 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

Year Ended December 31, 2015

Net income, as reported

$

45,292 

Litigation-related charge, net of tax, as mentioned aboveOffices

 

13,757 

Owned or Leased by Tutor Perini

Business Segment(s)

Adjusted net incomeLos Angeles (Sylmar), CA

$

59,049 

Leased

Corporate, Civil & Specialty Contractors

Barricada, Guam

Owned

Civil

Black River Falls, WI

Owned

Civil

Evansville, IN

Owned

Civil

Fort Lauderdale, FL

Leased

Building & Specialty Contractors

Framingham, MA

Owned

Building

Gulfport, MS

Owned

Building

Henderson, NV

Owned

Building & Specialty Contractors

Houston, TX

Owned

Specialty Contractors

Jessup, MD

Owned

Civil

Lakeview Terrace, CA

Leased

Specialty Contractors

Mount Vernon, NY

Leased

Specialty Contractors

New Rochelle, NY

Owned

Civil

Ozone Park, NY

Leased

Specialty Contractors

Philadelphia, PA

Leased

Building

Redwood City, CA

Leased

Building

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share, as reported

$

0.91 

Litigation-related charge, net of tax, as mentioned above

 

0.28 

Adjusted diluted earnings per common shareEquipment Yards

$

1.19 

Owned or Leased by Tutor Perini

Business Segment(s)

Black River Falls, WI

Owned

Civil

Fontana, CA

Leased

Civil

Jessup, MD

Owned

Civil

Lakeview Terrace, CA

Leased

Specialty Contractors

Peekskill, NY

Owned

Civil

Stockton, CA

Owned

Building

  

There were no non-GAAP adjustments

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Legal Proceedings are set forth in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

We do not own or operate any mines; however, we may be considered a  mine operator under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 because we provide construction-related services for customers in the yearsmining industry.  Accordingly, we provide information concerning mine safety violations and other mining regulation matters in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K. For the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.2016, revenue from mine construction services was $18.8  million.

  

2016

 


 

Table of Contents

 

ResultsPART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TPC.”  The quarterly market high and low sales prices for our common stock in 2016 and 2015 were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2016

 

2015

Market Price Range per Common Share:

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

$

16.64 

 

$

10.16 

 

$

26.71 

 

$

20.24 

June 30

$

24.17 

 

$

14.35 

 

$

24.74 

 

$

20.50 

September 30

$

25.98 

 

$

19.80 

 

$

21.86 

 

$

14.95 

December 31

$

30.20 

 

$

18.05 

 

$

19.57 

 

$

15.20 

Holders

At February 17, 2017, there were 427 holders of Segment Operationsrecord of our common stock, including holders of record on behalf of an indeterminate number of beneficial owners.

Dividends and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not pay dividends or repurchase stock during the year ended December 31, 2016;  we do not have any immediate plans to do so. Furthermore, our current debt agreements restrict us from paying dividends or repurchasing stock.

Issuance of Unregistered Securities

None.

17


Table of Contents

Performance Graph



The Company provides professional servicesfollowing graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to privateshareholders on our Common Stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the NYSE Composite Index and public customersthe Dow Jones Heavy Construction Index (“DJ Heavy Construction Index”). We selected the DJ Heavy Construction Index because we believe the index reflects the market conditions within the industry in which we primarily operate. The comparison of total return on investment, defined as the change in year-end stock price plus reinvested dividends, for each of the periods assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2011 in each of our Common Stock, the NYSE Composite Index and the DJ Heavy Construction Index, with investment weighted on the basis of market capitalization.

The comparisons in the fieldsfollowing graph are based on historical data and are not intended to forecast the possible future performance of constructionour Common Stock.

18


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Consolidated Financial Information

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management’s Discussion and construction management, including specialty construction services involving electrical, mechanical, heating, ventilationAnalysis of Financial Condition and air conditioning (HVAC), plumbingResults of Operations and pneumatically placed concrete primarilyItem 15. Exhibits andFinancial Statement Schedules inthis Annual Report. The following tables present selected financial data for the last five years. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands, except per share data)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

 

$

1,335,993 

Building

 

2,069,841 

 

 

1,802,535 

 

 

1,503,837 

 

 

1,551,979 

 

 

1,592,441 

Specialty Contractors

 

1,234,272 

 

 

1,228,030 

 

 

1,301,328 

 

 

1,182,277 

 

 

1,183,037 

Total

 

4,973,076 

 

 

4,920,472 

 

 

4,492,309 

 

 

4,175,672 

 

 

4,111,471 

Cost of operations

 

(4,515,886)

 

 

(4,564,219)

 

 

(3,986,867)

 

 

(3,708,768)

 

 

(3,696,339)

Gross profit

 

457,190 

 

 

356,253 

 

 

505,442 

 

 

466,904 

 

 

415,132 

General and administrative expenses

 

(255,270)

 

 

(250,840)

 

 

(263,752)

 

 

(263,082)

 

 

(260,369)

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(376,574)

Income (Loss) from construction operations

 

201,920 

 

 

105,413 

 

 

241,690 

 

 

203,822 

 

 

(221,811)

Other income (expense), net

 

6,977 

 

 

13,569 

 

 

(8,217)

 

 

(16,692)

 

 

(234)

Interest expense

 

(59,782)

 

 

(45,143)

 

 

(46,035)

 

 

(47,515)

 

 

(45,797)

Income (Loss) before income taxes

 

149,115 

 

 

73,839 

 

 

187,438 

 

 

139,615 

 

 

(267,842)

(Provision) Benefit for income taxes

 

(53,293)

 

 

(28,547)

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

(52,319)

 

 

2,442 

Net income (loss)

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (Loss) per share of common stock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

1.95 

 

$

0.92 

 

$

2.22 

 

$

1.82 

 

$

(5.59)

Diluted (a)

$

1.92 

 

$

0.91 

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

 

$

(5.59)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

49,150 

 

 

48,981 

 

 

48,562 

 

 

47,851 

 

 

47,470 

Diluted

 

49,864 

 

 

49,666 

 

 

49,114 

 

 

48,589 

 

 

47,470 

(a)

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had a decrease of $0.53 per diluted share due to unfavorable adjustments on various Five Star Electric projects in the Specialty Contractors segment. In addition, there was a decrease of $0.28 per diluted share due to unfavorable adjustments to the estimated cost to complete a Building segment project in New York. The Company’s 2015 results were also impacted by an unfavorable adjustment for an adverse legal decision related to a long-standing litigation matter in the Civil segment, which resulted in a decrease of $0.28 per diluted share. Furthermore, the Company recorded favorable adjustments for a Civil segment runway reconstruction project, which resulted in an increase of $0.16 per diluted share in 2015.

The Company's results for the year ended December 31, 2014 included a positive impact related to changes in the United Statesestimated recoveries for two Civil segment projects and its territoriesa Building segment hospitality and gaming project, resulting in certain other international locations. The Company’s three principal business segments are: Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors. For more information on these business segments, see “Item 1. – Business” above.a $0.33 increase per diluted share.



The Company's diluted EPS during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were positively impacted by $0.18 and $0.16, respectively, because of changes in the estimated recovery for the same hospitality and gaming project.

19


Table of Contents



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of and For the Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands, except ratios and percentages)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

$

2,837,756 

 

$

2,608,939 

 

$

2,454,594 

 

$

2,077,680 

 

$

1,971,776 

 

Current liabilities

 

1,518,943 

 

 

1,448,819 

 

 

1,344,447 

 

 

1,288,235 

 

 

1,228,266 

 

Working capital

$

1,318,813 

 

$

1,160,120 

 

$

1,110,147 

 

$

789,445 

 

$

743,510 

 

Current ratio

 

1.87 

 

 

1.80 

 

 

1.83 

 

 

1.61 

 

 

1.61 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

$

477,626 

 

$

523,525 

 

$

527,602 

 

$

498,125 

 

$

485,095 

 

Total assets

 

4,038,620 

 

 

3,861,300 

 

 

3,711,450 

 

 

3,358,663 

 

 

3,246,216 

 

Capitalization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

759,519 

 

 

817,684 

 

 

857,791 

 

 

726,171 

 

 

726,807 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,553,023 

 

 

1,420,227 

 

 

1,365,505 

 

 

1,247,535 

 

 

1,143,864 

 

Total capitalization

$

2,312,542 

 

$

2,237,911 

 

$

2,223,296 

 

$

1,973,706 

 

$

1,870,671 

 

Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization

 

33 

%

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

Ratio of debt to equity

 

0.49 

 

 

0.58 

 

 

0.63 

 

 

0.58 

 

 

0.64 

 

Shareholders' equity per common share

$

31.56 

 

$

28.94 

 

$

28.06 

 

$

25.76 

 

$

24.05 

 

OTHER DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog at year end

$

6,227,137 

 

$

7,465,129 

 

$

7,831,725 

 

$

6,954,287 

 

$

5,603,624 

 

New awards

 

3,735,084 

 

 

4,553,877 

 

 

5,369,747 

 

 

5,526,335 

 

 

3,606,818 

 

Capital expenditures

 

15,743 

 

 

35,912 

 

 

75,829 

 

 

59,049 

 

 

43,402 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

113,336 

 

 

14,072 

 

 

(56,678)

 

 

50,728 

 

 

(67,863)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(18,495)

 

 

(32,415)

 

 

(26,957)

 

 

(43,574)

 

 

(16,855)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(24,190)

 

 

(41,788)

 

 

99,295 

 

 

(55,287)

 

 

48,534 

 

We have changed the presentation of certain items in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 for the following items: (1) Subsequent to the issuance of our 2015 consolidated financial statements we identified that certain immaterial classification adjustments, related to the offsetting of deferred assets and liabilities by tax jurisdiction, were necessary to correct the error in the classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities. See Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details. (2) We early adopted ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (Subtopic 740-10), which requires companies to retrospectively present all deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. (3) During 2016, we retrospectively adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), which requires companies to present in the balance sheet debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. In addition, the amortization of debt discounts is required to be presented as a component of interest expense.

The aggregate impact of the changes discussed above is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of and For the Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands, except ratios)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

Other income (expense), net, as previously reported

$

12,453 

 

$

(9,536)

 

$

(18,575)

 

$

(1,857)

Reclass amortization of deferred debt cost to interest expense

 

1,116 

 

 

1,319 

 

 

1,883 

 

 

1,623 

Other income (expense), net, as restated

$

13,569 

 

$

(8,217)

 

$

(16,692)

 

$

(234)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, as previously reported

$

(44,027)

 

$

(44,716)

 

$

(45,632)

 

$

(44,174)

Reclass amortization of deferred debt cost to interest expense

 

(1,116)

 

 

(1,319)

 

 

(1,883)

 

 

(1,623)

Interest expense, as restated

$

(45,143)

 

$

(46,035)

 

$

(47,515)

 

$

(45,797)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current asset, as previously reported

$

2,635,245 

 

$

2,472,556 

 

$

2,085,920 

 

$

1,981,847 

Classification adjustments

 

(24,889)

 

 

(14,129)

 

 

(8,184)

 

 

(6,004)

Reclass current deferred tax assets to non-current deferred tax assets

 

(1,417)

 

 

(3,833)

 

 

(56)

 

 

(4,067)

Current asset, as restated

$

2,608,939 

 

$

2,454,594 

 

$

2,077,680 

 

$

1,971,776 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities, as previously reported

$

1,473,708 

 

$

1,358,576 

 

$

1,298,486 

 

$

1,234,270 

Classification adjustments

 

(24,889)

 

 

(14,129)

 

 

(8,184)

 

 

(6,004)

Reclass current deferred tax liabilities to non-current deferred tax liabilities

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,067)

 

 

 —

Current liabilities, as restated

$

1,448,819 

 

$

1,344,447 

 

$

1,288,235 

 

$

1,228,266 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets, as previously reported

$

4,042,441 

 

$

3,773,315 

 

$

3,397,438 

 

$

3,296,410 

Classification adjustments

 

(173,960)

 

 

(50,754)

 

 

(31,061)

 

 

(35,844)

Reclass non-current deferred tax assets to non-current deferred tax liabilities

 

(1,417)

 

 

(3,543)

 

 

(1)

 

 

(4,067)

Reclass deferred debt cost to long-term debt

 

(5,764)

 

 

(7,568)

 

 

(7,713)

 

 

(10,283)

Total assets, as restated

$

3,861,300 

 

$

3,711,450 

 

$

3,358,663 

 

$

3,246,216 

20


Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. For cautions about relying on such forward-looking statements, please refer to the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report immediately prior to Item 1. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Civil Segment

Our Civil segment specializes in public works construction and the replacement and reconstruction of infrastructure across most of the major geographic regions of the United States. Our civil contracting services include construction and rehabilitation of highways, bridges, tunnels, mass-transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities.

The Civil segment is comprised of the Company’s legacy heavy civil construction operations (civil operations of our predecessors, Perini Corporation, Tutor-Saliba and its subsidiary, Black Construction) and the following three companies acquired by the Company in 2011: Frontier-Kemper, Lunda Construction, and Becho. Frontier-Kemper is a heavy civil contractor engaged in the construction of tunnels for highways, railroads, subways and rapid transit systems; the construction of shafts and other facilities for water supply, wastewater transport and hydroelectric projects; and the development and equipping of mines with innovative hoisting, elevator and vertical conveyance systems. Lunda Construction is a heavy civil contractor engaged in the construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of bridges, railroads and other civil structures throughout the United States. Becho is engaged in drilling, foundation and excavation support for shoring, bridges, piers, roads and highway projects, primarily in the southwestern United States. We believe that the Company has benefitted through these acquisitions by an expanded geographic presence, enhanced civil construction capabilities and the addition of experienced management with proven, successful track records.

Our Civil segment’s customers primarily award contracts through one of two methods: the traditional public “competitive bid” method, in which price is the major determining factor, or through a request for proposals where contracts are awarded based on a combination of technical capability and price.

Traditionally, our Civil segment’s customers require each contractor to pre-qualify for construction business by meeting criteria that include technical capabilities and financial strength. Our financial strength and outstanding record of performance on challenging civil works projects often enable us to pre-qualify for projects in situations where smaller, less diversified contractors are unable to meet the qualification requirements. We believe this is a competitive advantage that makes us an attractive partner on the largest, most complex infrastructure projects and prestigious design-build, or DBOM (design-build-operate-maintain) contracts, which combine the nation’s top contractors with engineering firms, equipment manufacturers and project development consultants in a competitive bid selection process to execute highly sophisticated projects.

In its 2016 rankings, ENR ranked us as the nation’s fourth largest domestic heavy contractor, fourth largest contractor in the transportation market and tenth largest contractor overall.

We believe the Civil segment provides significant opportunities for growth due to the age and condition of existing infrastructure coupled with large government funding sources aimed at the replacement and reconstruction of aging U.S. infrastructure and popular, often bipartisan, support from the public and elected officials for infrastructure improvement programs. Funding for major civil infrastructure projects is typically provided through a combination of one or more of the following: local, regional, state and federal loans; grants; other direct allocations sourced through tax revenue; bonds; and user fees.

We have been active in civil construction since 1894 and believe we have a particular expertise in large, complex civil construction projects. We have completed or are currently working on some of the most significant civil construction projects in the United States. For example, we are currently working on various segments of the East Side Access project in New York City; the first phase of the California High-Speed Rail project; the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR-99 bored tunnel) project in Seattle, Washington; the Third Street Light Rail-Central Subway project in San Francisco, California; the platform over the eastern rail yard and the Amtrak Tunnel at Hudson Yards in New York City; and the rehabilitation of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge in New York. We have also performed runway widening and reconstruction projects at the John F. Kennedy International Airport in Queens, New York, and completed the New Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California,  the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California, and express toll lanes along I-95 in Maryland. In January of 2017, a joint-venture team we are leading was awarded a $1.4 billion contract for the Purple Line Segment 2 expansion project in Los Angeles, California.

Building Segment

Our Building segment has significant experience providing services to a number of specialized building markets for private and public works customers, including the hospitality and gaming, transportation, health care, corporate and municipal offices, sports and entertainment, education, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical, industrial and high-tech markets. We believe the success of the Building segment results from our proven ability to manage and perform large, complex projects with aggressive fast-track schedules; elaborate designs; and advanced mechanical, electrical and life safety systems, while providing accurate budgeting and strict quality control. Although price is a key competitive factor, we believe our strong reputation, long-standing customer relationships and significant level of repeat and referral business have enabled us to achieve our leading position.

4


Table of Contents

The Building segment is comprised of several operating units that provide general contracting, design-build, preconstruction and construction services in various regions of the United States. Tutor Perini Building Corp. focuses on large, complex building projects nationwide, including significant projects in the hospitality and gaming, commercial office, education, government facilities, and multi-unit residential markets. Rudolph and Sletten focuses on large, complex projects in California in the commercial office, technology, industrial, education, and government facilities markets. Roy Anderson Corp. provides its services, including disaster rapid response services, to public and private customers primarily throughout the southeastern United States. Perini Management Services provides diversified construction and design-build services to U.S. military and government agencies, as well as to surety companies and multi-national corporations in the United States and locations overseas. We believe that our national resources and strong résumé of notable projects will enable future growth on large, complex building projects.

In its 2016 rankings, ENR ranked us as the sixth largest domestic building contractor. We are a recognized leader in the hospitality and gaming market, specializing in the construction of high-end resorts and casinos. We work with hotel operators, Native American tribal councils, developers and architectural firms to provide diversified construction services to meet the challenges of new construction and renovation of hotel and resort properties. We believe that our reputation for completing projects on time is a significant competitive advantage in this market, as any delay in project completion could result in significant loss of revenue for the customer.

We have recently completed, or are currently working on, large private and public building projects across a wide array of building end markets, including commercial offices, multi-unit residential, health care, hospitality and gaming, transportation, education, and entertainment. Specific projects include a large technology research and development office building in northern California for a confidential technology customer; the Panorama Tower in Miami, Florida; Tower C and Tower D at Hudson Yards in New York City; the Washington Hospital expansion in Fremont, California; the Graton Rancheria Resort and Casino in Rohnert Park, California; the Chumash Casino Resort expansion in Santa Ynez, California; the Scarlet Pearl Casino Resort in D’Iberville, Mississippi; the Broadway Plaza retail development in Walnut Creek, California; Kaiser Hospital Buildings in San Leandro and Redwood City, California; and courthouses in San Bernardino and San Diego, California and Broward County, Florida. As a result of our reputation and track record, we were previously awarded and completed contracts for several marquee projects in the hospitality and gaming market, including the Resorts World New York Casino in Jamaica, New York, and CityCenter, the Cosmopolitan Resort and Casino, the Wynn Encore Hotel and Planet Hollywood, all in Las Vegas, Nevada. These projects span a wide array of building end markets and illustrate our Building segment’s résumé of successfully completed large-scale public and private projects.

Specialty Contractors Segment

Our Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems and pneumatically placed concrete for a full range of civil and building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass-transit end markets. This segment provides the Company with unique strengths and capabilities that position us as a full-service contractor with greater control over scheduled work, project delivery and risk management.

The Specialty Contractors segment is comprised of several operating units that provide unique services in various regions of the United States. Five Star Electric is the largest electrical contractor in New York City, providing construction services in the electrical sector, including power, lighting, fire alarm, security, telecommunications, low voltage and wireless systems. Five Star Electric has established itself as an industry leader performing work in both the public and private sectors, including high-end residential, hotel and commercial towers, transportation, water treatment plants, schools and universities, health care, retail, sports and government facilities. Fisk Electric covers many of the major commercial, transportation and industrial electrical construction markets in the southwestern and southeastern United States, with the ability to cover other attractive markets nationwide. Fisk’s expertise is in technology design and the development of electrical and technology systems for major projects spanning a broad variety of project types, including commercial office buildings, sports arenas, hospitals, research laboratories, hotels and casinos, convention centers, manufacturing plants, refineries and water and wastewater treatment facilities. WDF, Nagelbush and Desert Mechanical each provide mechanical, plumbing, HVAC and fire protection services to a range of customers in a wide variety of markets, including transportation, commercial/industrial, schools and universities and residential. WDF is one of the largest mechanical contractors servicing the New York City metropolitan region, Nagelbush operates primarily in Florida, and Desert Mechanical operates primarily in the western United States. Superior Gunite specializes in pneumatically placed structural concrete utilized in infrastructure projects nationwide, such as bridges, dams, tunnels and retaining walls.

In its 2016 rankings, ENR ranked us as the fifth largest electrical contractor1, eleventh largest mechanical contractor and tenth largest specialty contractor1 in the United States. Through Five Star Electric and WDF, collectively, we are also the largest specialty contractor in the New York City metropolitan area.

1This ranking represents the collective revenue of the Company’s specialty contracting subsidiaries as reported to ENR.

5


Table of Contents

We have recently completed, or are currently working on, various electrical and mechanical projects at the World Trade Center and at Hudson Yards in New York City, two signal system modernization projects in New York City and electrical work for the new hospital at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. This segment has supported, or is currently supporting, several large projects in our Building and Civil segments, including the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR-99 bored tunnel) project in Seattle, Washington; the McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas, Nevada; the Resorts World New York Casino in Jamaica, New York; various segments of the Greenwich Street Corridor and East Side Access projects in New York City; the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California; the New Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California; and several marquee projects in the hospitality and gaming market, including CityCenter, the Cosmopolitan Resort and Casino and Planet Hollywood, all in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The majority of work performed by our Specialty Contractors units is contracted directly with state and local municipal agencies, real estate developers, general contractors, commercial and industrial customers and school districts; additionally, a smaller, but growing, component of its work is performed as a subcontractor to the our Building and Civil segments.

Markets and Customers

We provide diversified construction services to a variety of end markets and customers. The following tables set forth certain reportable segment information relating to the Company’s operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue by Business Segment

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Civil

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

Building

 

2,069,841 

 

 

1,802,535 

 

 

1,503,837 

Specialty Contractors

 

1,234,272 

 

 

1,228,030 

 

 

1,301,328 

Total

$

4,973,076 

 

$

4,920,472 

 

$

4,492,309 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Mass Transit

$

547,913 

 

$

450,436 

 

$

534,110 

Bridges

 

533,762 

 

 

662,553 

 

 

535,733 

Highways

 

290,745 

 

 

388,963 

 

 

156,443 

Other

 

296,543 

 

 

387,955 

 

 

460,858 

Total

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Office

$

441,591 

 

$

226,928 

 

$

2,722 

Industrial and Commercial

 

271,480 

 

 

266,921 

 

 

90,194 

Municipal and Government

 

262,022 

 

 

335,762 

 

 

300,274 

Health Care Facilities

 

235,005 

 

 

164,963 

 

 

127,963 

Hospitality and Gaming

 

216,224 

 

 

250,757 

 

 

101,819 

Condominiums

 

193,755 

 

 

125,949 

 

 

115,251 

Mixed Use

 

163,454 

 

 

112,737 

 

 

159,083 

Education Facilities

 

157,808 

 

 

186,944 

 

 

337,062 

Other

 

128,502 

 

 

131,574 

 

 

269,469 

Total

$

2,069,841 

 

$

1,802,535 

 

$

1,503,837 

6


Table of Contents



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Contractors Segment Revenue by End Market

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Condominiums

$

239,937 

 

$

266,648 

 

$

105,670 

Mass Transit

 

204,398 

 

 

107,120 

 

 

217,318 

Industrial and Commercial

 

186,769 

 

 

164,480 

 

 

276,008 

Transportation

 

164,468 

 

 

149,971 

 

 

61,288 

Mixed Use

 

159,286 

 

 

96,072 

 

 

36,008 

Education Facilities

 

80,476 

 

 

195,647 

 

 

230,645 

Health Care Facilities

 

60,233 

 

 

40,228 

 

 

30,591 

Wastewater Treatment

 

58,479 

 

 

73,094 

 

 

69,000 

Other

 

80,226 

 

 

134,770 

 

 

274,800 

Total

$

1,234,272 

 

$

1,228,030 

 

$

1,301,328 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue by Customer Type

Year Ended December 31,



2016

 

2015

 

2014

State and Local Agencies

49 

%

 

55 

%

 

56 

%

Private Owners

45 

%

 

40 

%

 

40 

%

Federal Agencies

%

 

%

 

%

Total

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

State and Local Agencies. Our state and local government customers include state transportation departments, metropolitan authorities, cities, municipal agencies, school districts and public universities. We provide services to our state and local customers primarily pursuant to contracts awarded through competitive bidding processes. Our building construction services for state and local government customers have included judicial and correctional facilities, schools and dormitories, health care facilities, convention centers, parking structures and other municipal buildings. The vast majority of our civil contracting and building construction services are provided in locations throughout the United States and its territories.

Private Owners. Our private customers include real estate developers, health care companies, technology companies, hospitality and gaming resort owners, Native American sovereign nations, public corporations and private universities. We provide services to our private customers through negotiated contract arrangements, as well as through competitive bids.

Federal Agencies. Our federal government customers include the U.S. State Department, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Air Force and the National Park Service. We provide services to federal agencies primarily pursuant to contracts for specific or multi-year assignments that involve new construction or infrastructure repairs or improvements. A portion of our revenue from federal agencies is derived from projects in overseas locations, which we expect to continue for the foreseeable future as a result of our experience and strong relationships with federal agencies, together with anticipated expenditures for defense, diplomatic and security-related construction work.

Most federal, state and local government contracts contain provisions that permit the termination of contracts, in whole or in part, for the convenience of the government, among other reasons.

For additional information on revenue and total assets by geographic location, see Note 10of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7


Table of Contents

Backlog

Backlog in our industry is a measure of the total value of work that is remaining to be performed on contracts awarded. We include a construction project in our backlog when a contract is awarded or a letter of commitment is obtained and we believe adequate funding is in place. As a result, we believe our backlog is firm, and although cancellations or scope adjustments may occur, historically they have not been material. Our backlog by segment, end market and customer type is presented in the following tables:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog by Business Segment

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Civil

$

2,672,126 

 

43 

%

 

$

2,743,708 

 

37 

%

Building

 

1,981,193 

 

32 

%

 

 

2,780,440 

 

37 

%

Specialty Contractors

 

1,573,818 

 

25 

%

 

 

1,940,981 

 

26 

%

Total

$

6,227,137 

 

100 

%

 

$

7,465,129 

 

100 

%

We estimate that approximately $3.4 billion, or 54%, of our backlog as of December 31, 2016 will be recognized as revenue in 2017.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil Segment Backlog by End Market

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Mass Transit

$

1,853,117 

 

69 

%

 

$

1,455,194 

 

53 

%

Highways

 

379,630 

 

14 

%

 

 

505,998 

 

18 

%

Bridges

 

297,810 

 

11 

%

 

 

497,702 

 

18 

%

Other

 

141,569 

 

%

 

 

284,814 

 

11 

%

Total

$

2,672,126 

 

100 

%

 

$

2,743,708 

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Segment Backlog by End Market

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Hospitality and Gaming

$

517,017 

 

26 

%

 

$

67,530 

 

%

Office

 

342,034 

 

17 

%

 

 

722,582 

 

26 

%

Mixed Use

 

249,088 

 

13 

%

 

 

340,086 

 

12 

%

Municipal and Government

 

206,164 

 

10 

%

 

 

337,273 

 

12 

%

Health Care Facilities

 

192,280 

 

10 

%

 

 

333,759 

 

12 

%

Condominiums

 

169,366 

 

%

 

 

352,251 

 

13 

%

Education Facilities

 

168,634 

 

%

 

 

233,414 

 

%

Industrial and Commercial

 

74,787 

 

%

 

 

250,511 

 

%

Other

 

61,823 

 

%

 

 

143,034 

 

%

Total

$

1,981,193 

 

100 

%

 

$

2,780,440 

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Contractors Segment Backlog by End Market

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Mass Transit

$

612,688 

 

39 

%

 

$

596,455 

 

31 

%

Mixed Use

 

239,763 

 

15 

%

 

 

262,941 

 

14 

%

Condominiums

 

153,354 

 

10 

%

 

 

272,061 

 

14 

%

Industrial and Commercial

 

130,028 

 

%

 

 

180,957 

 

%

Transportation

 

105,990 

 

%

 

 

228,536 

 

12 

%

Health Care Facilities

 

101,494 

 

%

 

 

47,862 

 

%

Education Facilities

 

83,897 

 

%

 

 

93,752 

 

%

Other

 

146,604 

 

10 

%

 

 

258,417 

 

13 

%

Total

$

1,573,818 

 

100 

%

 

$

1,940,981 

 

100 

%

8


Table of Contents



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Backlog by Customer Type

As of December 31,



2016

 

2015

State and Local Agencies

57 

%

 

55 

%

Private Owners

36 

%

 

38 

%

Federal Agencies

%

 

%

Total

100 

%

 

100 

%

Types of Contracts

The contracting and management services we provide consist of planning and scheduling the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for the timely completion of a project in accordance with the terms, plans and specifications contained in a construction contract. We provide these services by entering into traditional contracting arrangements as follows:

·

Fixed price or lump-sum contracts are most commonly used for projects in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments and generally commit the Company to provide all of the resources required to complete a project for a fixed sum. Usually, fixed price contracts transfer more risk to the Company, but offer the opportunity for greater profits.

·

Guaranteed maximum price (“GMP”) contracts provide for a cost plus fee arrangement up to a maximum agreed upon price. These contracts place risks on the Company for amounts in excess of the GMP, but may permit an opportunity for greater profits than under cost plus fee contracts through sharing agreements with the owner on any cost savings that may be realized. Services provided by our Building segment to various private customers are often performed under GMP contracts.

·

Unit price contracts are most prevalent for projects in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments and generally commit the Company to provide an undetermined number of units or components that comprise a project at a fixed price per unit. This approach shifts the risk of estimating the quantity of units required to the project owner, but the risk of increased cost per unit is borne by the Company, unless otherwise allowed for in the contract.

·

Cost plus fee contracts are used for many projects in the Building and Specialty Contractors segments. Cost plus fee contracts include cost plus fixed fee contracts and cost plus award fee contracts. Cost plus fixed fee contracts provide for reimbursement of approved project costs plus a fixed fee. Cost plus award fee contracts provide for reimbursement of the project costs plus a base fee, as well as an incentive fee based on cost and/or schedule performance. Cost plus fee contracts serve to minimize the Company’s financial risk, but may also limit profits.

Fixed price contracts account for a substantial portion of our revenue and are expected to continue to represent a sizeable percentage of both total revenue and backlog. The composition of revenue and backlog by type of contract for 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

Revenue

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Fixed price

47 

%

 

44 

%

 

60 

%

Guaranteed maximum price

28 

%

 

32 

%

 

24 

%

Unit price

11 

%

 

12 

%

 

%

Cost plus fee and other

14 

%

 

12 

%

 

%



100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

Backlog

2016

 

2015

Fixed price

63 

%

 

55 

%

Guaranteed maximum price

21 

%

 

22 

%

Unit price

%

 

%

Cost plus fee and other

10 

%

 

16 

%



100 

%

 

100 

%

9


Table of Contents

Competition

The markets in which we compete include numerous competitors. In the small to mid-sized work that we have targeted, we have continued to experience strong pricing competition from our competitors. Much of the work that we target, however, is for larger, more complex projects where there are fewer active market participants because of the enhanced capabilities and resources required to perform the work. As a result, on these larger projects we typically face fewer competitors. Despite this, over the past two years we have seen increased competition especially from foreign competitors that have been pursuing major projects in the United States due to the relatively larger size and significant number of U.S. opportunities. We anticipate that the increased level of foreign competition will persist for the foreseeable future.

In our Civil segment, we compete principally with large civil construction firms, including (alphabetically) Dragados USA; Fluor Corporation; Granite Construction; Kiewit Corporation; Skanska USA; Traylor Bros., Inc.; and The Walsh Group. In our Building segment, we compete with a variety of national and regional contractors. Our primary competitors are (alphabetically) AECOM (through its acquisitions of Tishman Construction and Hunt Construction Group); Balfour Beatty Construction; Clark Construction Group; DPR Construction; Gilbane, Inc.; Hensel Phelps Construction Co.; McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.; Skanska USA; Suffolk Construction; and Turner Construction Company. In our Specialty Contractors segment, we compete principally with various regional and local electrical, mechanical and plumbing subcontractors. We believe price, experience, reputation, responsiveness, customer relationships, project completion track record, schedule control, risk management and quality of work are key factors customers consider when awarding contracts.

Construction Costs

If prices for materials, labor or equipment increase excessively, provisions in certain types of contracts often shift all or a major portion of any adverse impact to the customer. In our fixed price contracts, we attempt to insulate ourselves from the unfavorable effects of inflation, when possible, by incorporating escalating wage and price assumptions into our construction cost estimates, by obtaining firm fixed price quotes from major subcontractors and material suppliers, and by purchasing required materials early in the project schedule. Construction and other materials used in our construction activities are generally available locally from multiple sources and have been in adequate supply during recent years. Labor resources for our domestic projects are largely obtained through various labor unions with which we are associated. We have not experienced significant labor shortages in recent years, nor do we expect to in the future. We employ expatriate and local labor in selected overseas areas.

Environmental Matters

Our properties and operations are subject to federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including requirements for water discharges; air emissions; the use, management and disposal of solid or hazardous materials or wastes; and the cleanup of contamination. In certain circumstances, we may also be required to hire subcontractors to dispose of hazardous materials encountered on a project in accordance with a plan approved in advance by the owner. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, and we continually evaluate whether we must take additional steps to ensure compliance with those laws and regulations. However, future requirements or amendments to current laws or regulations imposing more stringent requirements could require us to incur additional costs to maintain or achieve compliance.

In addition, some environmental laws, such as the U.S. federal “Superfund” law and similar state statutes, can impose liability for the entire cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former owners or operators or upon parties who generated waste at, or sent waste to, these sites, regardless of who owned the site at the time of the release or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity. Contaminants have been detected at some of the sites that we own and where we have worked as a contractor in the past, and we have incurred costs for the investigation and remediation of hazardous substances. We believe that our liabilities for these sites are not material, either individually or in the aggregate. We have pollution liability insurance coverage for such matters, and we receive indemnification from customers to cover the risks associated with environmental remediation.

Insurance and Bonding

All of our properties and equipment, as well as those of our joint ventures, are covered by insurance in amounts that we believe are consistent with our risk of loss and industry practice. Our wholly owned subsidiary, PCR Insurance Company, issues deductible reimbursement policies for subcontractor default insurance, auto liability, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance, allowing us to centralize our claims and risk management functions to reduce our insurance-related costs.

As a normal part of the construction business, we are often required to provide various types of surety bonds as an additional level of security of our performance. We also require many of our higher-risk subcontractors to provide surety bonds as security for payment of subcontractors and suppliers and to guarantee their performance. As an alternative to traditional surety bonds, we also have purchased subcontractor default insurance for certain construction projects to insure against the risk of subcontractor default.

10


Table of Contents

Employees

The number of our employees varies based on the number of active projects, the type and magnitude of those projects, as well as our position within the lifecycle of those projects. Our total number of employees as of December 31, 2016 was 11,603.  

We are signatory to numerous local and regional collective bargaining agreements, both directly and through trade associations, as a union contractor. These agreements cover all necessary union crafts and are subject to various renewal dates. Estimated amounts for wage escalation related to the expiration of union contracts are included in our bids on various projects; accordingly, the expiration of any union contract in the next year is not expected to have any material impact on us. During the past several years, we have not experienced any significant work stoppages caused by our union employees.

Financial information about geographic areas is discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading “Geographic Information.”

Available Information

Our website address is www.tutorperini.com. In the ‘‘Investor Relations’’ portion of our website, under “Financial Reports,” subsection “SEC Filings,” you may obtain free electronic copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, as well as reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act of transactions in our stock by our directors and executive officers. These reports are made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports, and any amendments to them, are also available at the Internet website of the SEC, www.sec.gov. The public may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. In order to obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room, you may call 1-800-732-0330. We also maintain various documents, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of the Committees of our Board of Directors in the “Corporate Governance” portion of our website.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

We are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Set forth below, and elsewhere in this report, are descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

A significant slowdown or decline in economic conditions could adversely affect our operations.

Any significant decline in economic conditions in any of the markets we serve or uncertainty regarding the economic outlook, could result in a decline in demand for infrastructure projects and commercial building developments. In addition, any instability in the financial and credit markets could negatively impact our customers’ ability to pay us on a timely basis, or at all, for work on projects already under construction, could cause our customers to delay or cancel construction projects in our backlog or could create difficulties for customers to obtain adequate financing to fund new construction projects. Such consequences could have an adverse impact on our future operating results. Lastly, we are more susceptible to adverse economic conditions in New York and California, as a significant portion of our operations are concentrated in those states.

If we are unable to accurately estimate the overall risks, revenue or costs on a contract, we may achieve a lower than anticipated profit or incur a loss on that contract.

Accounting for contract related revenue and costs requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that may change significantly throughout the project lifecycle, resulting in a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. In addition, cost overruns on fixed price and GMP contracts may result in lower profits or losses.

Our contracts require us to perform extra, or change order, work, which can result in disputes or claims and adversely affect our working capital, profits and cash flows.

Our contracts generally require us to perform extra, or change order, work as directed by the customer even if the customer has not agreed in advance on the scope or price of the work to be performed. This process may result in disputes or claims over whether the work performed is beyond the scope of work directed by the customer and/or exceeds the price the customer is willing to pay for the work performed. To the extent we do not recover our costs for this work or there are delays in the recovery of these costs, our cash flows and working capital could be adversely impacted.

11


Table of Contents

We are subject to significant legal proceedings which, if determined adversely to us, could harm our reputation, preclude us from bidding on future projects and/or have a material effect on us. We also may invest significant working capital on projects while legal proceedings are being settled.

We are involved in various lawsuits, including the legal proceedings described under Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Litigation is inherently uncertain, and it is not possible to accurately predict what the final outcome will be of any legal proceeding. We must make certain assumptions and rely on estimates, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, regarding potential outcomes of legal proceedings in order to determine an appropriate contingent liability and charge to income. Any result that is materially different than our estimates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, any adverse judgments could harm our reputation and preclude us from bidding on future projects.

We occasionally bring claims against project owners for additional cost exceeding the contract price or for amounts not included in the original contract price. When these types of events occur and unresolved claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of claims could have a material effect on our liquidity and financial results.

Competition for new project awards is intense, and our failure to compete effectively could reduce our market share and profits.

New project awards are determined through either a competitive bid basis or on a negotiated basis. Projects are generally awarded based upon price but often take into account other factors, such as technical approach and qualifications, duration of project execution and past performance on similar projects completed. Within our industry, we compete with many international, regional and local construction firms. Some of these competitors have achieved greater market penetration than we have in the markets in which we compete, and some have greater resources than we do. If we are unable to compete successfully in such markets, our relative market share and profits could be reduced.

We may not fully realize the revenue value reported in our backlog due to cancellations or reductions in scope.

As of December 31, 2016, our backlog of uncompleted construction work was approximately $6.2 billion. The revenue projected in our backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits. For example, the cancellation or reduction in scope of any project in our backlog could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our debt agreements.

We currently have, and expect to continue to have, a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2016, we had total debt of $759.5 million. If we are unable to meet the terms of the financial covenants or fail to comply with any of the other restrictions contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness, an event of default could occur, causing the debt related to such agreement to become immediately due. If such acceleration occurs, we may not be able to repay such indebtedness as required. Since indebtedness under our Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of our assets, acceleration of this debt could result in foreclosure of those assets and a negative impact on our operations. In addition, a failure to meet the terms of our Credit Agreement could result in a reduction of future borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement, causing a loss of liquidity. A loss of liquidity could adversely impact our ability to execute projects in our backlog, obtain new projects, engage subcontractors, and attract and retain key employees.

Our actual results could differ from the assumptions and estimates used to prepare our financial statements.

In preparing our financial statements, we are required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) to make estimates and assumptions as of the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring significant estimates by our management include, but are not limited to:

• recognition of contract revenue, costs, profits or losses in applying the principles of percentage-of-completion accounting;

• recognition of revenue related to project incentives or awards we expect to receive;

• recognition of recoveries under contract change orders or claims;

• estimated amounts for expected project losses, warranty costs, contract close-out or other costs;

• collectability of billed and unbilled accounts receivable;

• asset valuations;

• income tax provisions and related valuation allowances;

12


Table of Contents

• determination of expense and potential liabilities under pension and other post-retirement benefit programs; and

• accruals for other estimated liabilities, including litigation and insurance revenue/reserves.

Our actual business and financial results could differ from our estimates of such results, which could have a material negative impact on our financial condition and reported results of operations.

The level of federal, state and local government spending for infrastructure and other public projects could adversely affect the number of projects available to us in the future.

The civil construction and public-works building markets are dependent on the amount of work funded by various government agencies, which depends on many factors, including the condition of the existing infrastructure and buildings; the need for new or expanded infrastructure and buildings; and federal, state and local government spending levels. As a result, our future operating results could be negatively impacted by any decrease in demand for public projects or decrease or delay in government funding, which could result from a variety of factors, including delays in the sale of voter-approved bonds, budget shortfalls, credit rating downgrades or long-term impairment in the ability of state and local governments to raise capital in the municipal bond market.

The construction services industry is highly schedule driven, and our failure to meet the schedule requirements of our contracts could adversely affect our reputation and/or expose us to financial liability.

Many of our contracts are subject to specific completion schedule requirements. Any failure to meet contractual schedule requirements could subject us to liquidated damages, liability for our customer’s actual cost arising out of our delay and damage to our reputation.

We require substantial personnel, including construction and project managers and specialty subcontractor resources to execute and perform our contracts in backlog. The successful execution of our business strategies is also dependent upon our ability to attract, retain and implement succession plans for key officers.

Our ability to execute and perform on our contracts in backlog depends in large part upon our ability to hire and retain highly skilled personnel, including project and construction management and trade labor resources, such as carpenters, masons and other skilled workers. In the event we are unable to attract, hire and retain the requisite personnel and subcontractors necessary to execute and perform our backlog, we may experience delays in completing projects in accordance with project schedules or an increase in expected costs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, our reputation and our relationships. In addition, if we lack the personnel and specialty subcontractors necessary to perform on our current contract backlog, we may find it necessary to curtail our pursuit of new projects.

The execution of our business strategies also substantially depends on our ability to retain several key members of our management. Losing any of these individuals could adversely affect our business. The majority of these key officers are not bound by employment agreements. Volatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key staff to whom we have provided share-based compensation. Additionally, because a substantial portion of our key executives' compensation is placed "at risk" and linked to the performance of our business, when our operating results are negatively impacted, we are at greater risk of employee turnover. If we lose our existing key executives and are unable to execute a succession plan our operating results would likely be harmed.

Systems and information technology interruption and breaches in data security could adversely impact our ability to operate and negatively impact our operating results.

We are reliant on computer and other information technology that could be interrupted or damaged by a variety of factors including, but not limited to, cyber-attacks, natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, acts of war, computer viruses and physical damage. The resulting consequences could include a loss of critical data, a delay in operations or an unintentional disclosure of confidential information, any of which could have a material impact to our Company and its consolidated financial statements.

Our participation in construction joint ventures exposes us to liability and/or harm to our reputation for failures by our partners.

As part of our business, we enter into joint venture arrangements typically to jointly bid on and execute particular projects, thereby reducing our risk profile while enhancing the execution capability and financial reward of project teams. Success on these joint projects depends in large part on whether our joint-venture partners satisfy their contractual obligations. We and our joint-venture partners are generally jointly and severally liable for all liabilities and obligations of our joint ventures. If a joint venture partner fails to perform or is financially unable to bear its portion of required capital contributions or other obligations, including liabilities stemming from lawsuits, we could be required to make additional investments, provide additional services or pay more than our proportionate share of a liability to make up for our partner’s shortfall. Further, if we are unable to adequately address our partner’s

13


Table of Contents

performance issues, the customer may terminate the project, which could result in legal liability to us, harm our reputation, reduce our profit on a project or, in some cases, result in a loss.

We are subject to a number of risks as a U.S. government contractor, which could harm our reputation, result in fines or penalties against us and/or adversely impact our financial condition.

Failure to comply with laws and regulations related to government contracts could result in contract termination, suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. government, civil fines and criminal prosecution, any of which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and future financial condition and performance.

Conversion of our outstanding Convertible Notes could dilute ownership interests of existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Based on the terms of the indenture for the Convertible Notes, we may redeem the Convertible Notes in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of the two. As a result, a conversion of some or all of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of our common stock issuable upon such conversion of the Convertible Notes could cause the price of our common stock to decline. In addition, the existence of the Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because a conversion of the Convertible Notes could depress the price of our common stock.

We may need to include the potential dilutive impact of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation.

We currently intend to pay the principal amount of our Convertible Notes in cash; therefore, we have not included the potential dilutive effect of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculations. If, however, there is a change in future circumstances as a result of a decline in our projected cash flow or for other reasons, we may conclude at such time that it will be preferable to use shares to satisfy the Convertible Notes. Such a change in our intentions would result in the inclusion of the potential dilutive impact of the Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation, which would result in a decrease in our diluted earnings per share. 

Weather can significantly affect our revenue and profitability.

Inclement weather conditions, such as significant storms and unusual temperatures, can impact our ability to perform work. Adverse weather conditions can cause delays and increases in project costs, resulting in variability in our revenue and profitability.

Our international operations expose us to economic, political and other risks, as well as uncertainty related to U.S. Government funding, which could adversely affect our revenue and earnings. In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, we derived approximately $170.7 million of revenue from our work on projects located outside of the United States. Our international operations expose us to risks inherent in doing business in certain hostile regions outside the United States, including political risks; risks of loss due to acts of war; unstable economic, financial and market conditions; potential incompatibility with foreign subcontractors and vendors; foreign currency controls and fluctuations; trade restrictions; logistical challenges; variations in taxes; and changes in labor conditions, labor strikes and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations. Failure to successfully manage risks associated with our international operations could result in higher operating costs than anticipated or could delay or limit our ability to generate revenue and income from construction operations in key international markets.

The U.S. federal government has approved various spending bills for the construction of defense- and diplomacy-related projects and has allocated significant funds to the defense of U.S. interests around the world from the threat of terrorism. The federal government has also approved funds for development in conjunction with the relocation of military personnel into Guam. However, federal government funding levels for construction projects in the Middle East have decreased significantly over the past several years as the U.S. government has reduced the number of military troops and support personnel in the region. As a result, we have seen a decrease in the number and size of federal government projects available to us in this region. Any decrease in U.S. federal government funding for projects in Guam or in other U.S. Territories or countries in which we are pursuing work may result in project delays or cancellations, which could reduce our revenue and earnings.

Finally, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. While our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, there is no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from circumstances or actions that could result in possible criminal penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment and loss of reputation, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

14


Table of Contents

In connection with mergers and acquisitions, we have recorded goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and adversely affect our operating results. Assessing whether impairment has occurred requires us to make significant judgments and assumptions about the future, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and if actual events turn out to be materially less favorable than the judgments we make and the assumptions we use, we may be required to record impairment charges in the future.

We had approximately $635.4 million of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016. We assess these assets for impairment annually, or more often if required. Our assessments involve a number of estimates and assumptions that are inherently subjective, require significant judgment and regard highly uncertain matters that are subject to change. The use of different assumptions or estimates could materially affect the determination as to whether or not an impairment has occurred. In addition, if future events are less favorable than what we assumed or estimated in our impairment analysis, we may be required to record impairment charge, which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Conflicts of interest may arise involving certain of our directors.

As of December 31, 2016, our chairman and chief executive officer, Ronald N. Tutor, and three trusts controlled by Mr. Tutor (the “Tutor Group”) owned approximately 18% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Under the terms of Mr. Tutor’s employment agreement, he has the right to designate one nominee for election as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors so long as the Tutor Group owns at least 11.25% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. As of the date of this Form 10-K, there are 10 current directors, one of whom was appointed by Mr. Tutor in November 2013. Mr. Tutor will be able to exert significant influence over the outcome of a range of corporate matters, including significant corporate transactions requiring a shareholder vote, such as a merger or a sale of the Company or its assets. This concentration of ownership and influence in management and Board decision-making also could harm the price of our common stock by, among other things, discouraging a potential acquirer from seeking to acquire shares of our common stock or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

15


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We have office facilities and equipment yards in the following locations, which we believe are suitable and adequate for our current needs:

Offices

Owned or Leased by Tutor Perini

Business Segment(s)

Los Angeles (Sylmar), CA

Leased

Corporate, Civil & Specialty Contractors

Barricada, Guam

Owned

Civil

Black River Falls, WI

Owned

Civil

Evansville, IN

Owned

Civil

Fort Lauderdale, FL

Leased

Building & Specialty Contractors

Framingham, MA

Owned

Building

Gulfport, MS

Owned

Building

Henderson, NV

Owned

Building & Specialty Contractors

Houston, TX

Owned

Specialty Contractors

Jessup, MD

Owned

Civil

Lakeview Terrace, CA

Leased

Specialty Contractors

Mount Vernon, NY

Leased

Specialty Contractors

New Rochelle, NY

Owned

Civil

Ozone Park, NY

Leased

Specialty Contractors

Philadelphia, PA

Leased

Building

Redwood City, CA

Leased

Building

Equipment Yards

Owned or Leased by Tutor Perini

Business Segment(s)

Black River Falls, WI

Owned

Civil

Fontana, CA

Leased

Civil

Jessup, MD

Owned

Civil

Lakeview Terrace, CA

Leased

Specialty Contractors

Peekskill, NY

Owned

Civil

Stockton, CA

Owned

Building

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Legal Proceedings are set forth in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

We do not own or operate any mines; however, we may be considered a  mine operator under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 because we provide construction-related services for customers in the mining industry.  Accordingly, we provide information concerning mine safety violations and other mining regulation matters in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K. For the year ended December 31, 2016, revenue from mine construction services was $18.8  million.

16


Table of Contents

PART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TPC.”  The quarterly market high and low sales prices for our common stock in 2016 and 2015 were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2016

 

2015

Market Price Range per Common Share:

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

$

16.64 

 

$

10.16 

 

$

26.71 

 

$

20.24 

June 30

$

24.17 

 

$

14.35 

 

$

24.74 

 

$

20.50 

September 30

$

25.98 

 

$

19.80 

 

$

21.86 

 

$

14.95 

December 31

$

30.20 

 

$

18.05 

 

$

19.57 

 

$

15.20 

Holders

At February 17, 2017, there were 427 holders of record of our common stock, including holders of record on behalf of an indeterminate number of beneficial owners.

Dividends and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not pay dividends or repurchase stock during the year ended December 31, 2016;  we do not have any immediate plans to do so. Furthermore, our current debt agreements restrict us from paying dividends or repurchasing stock.

Issuance of Unregistered Securities

None.

17


Table of Contents

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders on our Common Stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the NYSE Composite Index and the Dow Jones Heavy Construction Index (“DJ Heavy Construction Index”). We selected the DJ Heavy Construction Index because we believe the index reflects the market conditions within the industry in which we primarily operate. The comparison of total return on investment, defined as the change in year-end stock price plus reinvested dividends, for each of the periods assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2011 in each of our Common Stock, the NYSE Composite Index and the DJ Heavy Construction Index, with investment weighted on the basis of market capitalization.

The comparisons in the following graph are based on historical data and are not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our Common Stock.

18


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Consolidated Financial Information

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 15. Exhibits andFinancial Statement Schedules inthis Annual Report. The following tables present selected financial data for the last five years. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands, except per share data)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Civil

$

1,668,963 

 

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,441,416 

 

$

1,335,993 

Building

 

2,069,841 

 

 

1,802,535 

 

 

1,503,837 

 

 

1,551,979 

 

 

1,592,441 

Specialty Contractors

 

1,234,272 

 

 

1,228,030 

 

 

1,301,328 

 

 

1,182,277 

 

 

1,183,037 

Total

 

4,973,076 

 

 

4,920,472 

 

 

4,492,309 

 

 

4,175,672 

 

 

4,111,471 

Cost of operations

 

(4,515,886)

 

 

(4,564,219)

 

 

(3,986,867)

 

 

(3,708,768)

 

 

(3,696,339)

Gross profit

 

457,190 

 

 

356,253 

 

 

505,442 

 

 

466,904 

 

 

415,132 

General and administrative expenses

 

(255,270)

 

 

(250,840)

 

 

(263,752)

 

 

(263,082)

 

 

(260,369)

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(376,574)

Income (Loss) from construction operations

 

201,920 

 

 

105,413 

 

 

241,690 

 

 

203,822 

 

 

(221,811)

Other income (expense), net

 

6,977 

 

 

13,569 

 

 

(8,217)

 

 

(16,692)

 

 

(234)

Interest expense

 

(59,782)

 

 

(45,143)

 

 

(46,035)

 

 

(47,515)

 

 

(45,797)

Income (Loss) before income taxes

 

149,115 

 

 

73,839 

 

 

187,438 

 

 

139,615 

 

 

(267,842)

(Provision) Benefit for income taxes

 

(53,293)

 

 

(28,547)

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

(52,319)

 

 

2,442 

Net income (loss)

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

 

$

(265,400)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (Loss) per share of common stock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

1.95 

 

$

0.92 

 

$

2.22 

 

$

1.82 

 

$

(5.59)

Diluted (a)

$

1.92 

 

$

0.91 

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

 

$

(5.59)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

49,150 

 

 

48,981 

 

 

48,562 

 

 

47,851 

 

 

47,470 

Diluted

 

49,864 

 

 

49,666 

 

 

49,114 

 

 

48,589 

 

 

47,470 

(a)

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had a decrease of $0.53 per diluted share due to unfavorable adjustments on various Five Star Electric projects in the Specialty Contractors segment. In addition, there was a decrease of $0.28 per diluted share due to unfavorable adjustments to the estimated cost to complete a Building segment project in New York. The Company’s 2015 results were also impacted by an unfavorable adjustment for an adverse legal decision related to a long-standing litigation matter in the Civil segment, which resulted in a decrease of $0.28 per diluted share. Furthermore, the Company recorded favorable adjustments for a Civil segment runway reconstruction project, which resulted in an increase of $0.16 per diluted share in 2015.

The Company's results for the year ended December 31, 2014 included a positive impact related to changes in the estimated recoveries for two Civil segment projects and a Building segment hospitality and gaming project, resulting in a $0.33 increase per diluted share.

The Company's diluted EPS during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were positively impacted by $0.18 and $0.16, respectively, because of changes in the estimated recovery for the same hospitality and gaming project.

19


Table of Contents



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of and For the Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands, except ratios and percentages)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

$

2,837,756 

 

$

2,608,939 

 

$

2,454,594 

 

$

2,077,680 

 

$

1,971,776 

 

Current liabilities

 

1,518,943 

 

 

1,448,819 

 

 

1,344,447 

 

 

1,288,235 

 

 

1,228,266 

 

Working capital

$

1,318,813 

 

$

1,160,120 

 

$

1,110,147 

 

$

789,445 

 

$

743,510 

 

Current ratio

 

1.87 

 

 

1.80 

 

 

1.83 

 

 

1.61 

 

 

1.61 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

$

477,626 

 

$

523,525 

 

$

527,602 

 

$

498,125 

 

$

485,095 

 

Total assets

 

4,038,620 

 

 

3,861,300 

 

 

3,711,450 

 

 

3,358,663 

 

 

3,246,216 

 

Capitalization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

759,519 

 

 

817,684 

 

 

857,791 

 

 

726,171 

 

 

726,807 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,553,023 

 

 

1,420,227 

 

 

1,365,505 

 

 

1,247,535 

 

 

1,143,864 

 

Total capitalization

$

2,312,542 

 

$

2,237,911 

 

$

2,223,296 

 

$

1,973,706 

 

$

1,870,671 

 

Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization

 

33 

%

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

 

37 

%

 

39 

%

Ratio of debt to equity

 

0.49 

 

 

0.58 

 

 

0.63 

 

 

0.58 

 

 

0.64 

 

Shareholders' equity per common share

$

31.56 

 

$

28.94 

 

$

28.06 

 

$

25.76 

 

$

24.05 

 

OTHER DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backlog at year end

$

6,227,137 

 

$

7,465,129 

 

$

7,831,725 

 

$

6,954,287 

 

$

5,603,624 

 

New awards

 

3,735,084 

 

 

4,553,877 

 

 

5,369,747 

 

 

5,526,335 

 

 

3,606,818 

 

Capital expenditures

 

15,743 

 

 

35,912 

 

 

75,829 

 

 

59,049 

 

 

43,402 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

113,336 

 

 

14,072 

 

 

(56,678)

 

 

50,728 

 

 

(67,863)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(18,495)

 

 

(32,415)

 

 

(26,957)

 

 

(43,574)

 

 

(16,855)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(24,190)

 

 

(41,788)

 

 

99,295 

 

 

(55,287)

 

 

48,534 

 

We have changed the presentation of certain items in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 for the following items: (1) Subsequent to the issuance of our 2015 consolidated financial statements we identified that certain immaterial classification adjustments, related to the offsetting of deferred assets and liabilities by tax jurisdiction, were necessary to correct the error in the classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities. See Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details. (2) We early adopted ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (Subtopic 740-10), which requires companies to retrospectively present all deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. (3) During 2016, we retrospectively adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), which requires companies to present in the balance sheet debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. In addition, the amortization of debt discounts is required to be presented as a component of interest expense.

The aggregate impact of the changes discussed above is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of and For the Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands, except ratios)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

Other income (expense), net, as previously reported

$

12,453 

 

$

(9,536)

 

$

(18,575)

 

$

(1,857)

Reclass amortization of deferred debt cost to interest expense

 

1,116 

 

 

1,319 

 

 

1,883 

 

 

1,623 

Other income (expense), net, as restated

$

13,569 

 

$

(8,217)

 

$

(16,692)

 

$

(234)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, as previously reported

$

(44,027)

 

$

(44,716)

 

$

(45,632)

 

$

(44,174)

Reclass amortization of deferred debt cost to interest expense

 

(1,116)

 

 

(1,319)

 

 

(1,883)

 

 

(1,623)

Interest expense, as restated

$

(45,143)

 

$

(46,035)

 

$

(47,515)

 

$

(45,797)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current asset, as previously reported

$

2,635,245 

 

$

2,472,556 

 

$

2,085,920 

 

$

1,981,847 

Classification adjustments

 

(24,889)

 

 

(14,129)

 

 

(8,184)

 

 

(6,004)

Reclass current deferred tax assets to non-current deferred tax assets

 

(1,417)

 

 

(3,833)

 

 

(56)

 

 

(4,067)

Current asset, as restated

$

2,608,939 

 

$

2,454,594 

 

$

2,077,680 

 

$

1,971,776 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities, as previously reported

$

1,473,708 

 

$

1,358,576 

 

$

1,298,486 

 

$

1,234,270 

Classification adjustments

 

(24,889)

 

 

(14,129)

 

 

(8,184)

 

 

(6,004)

Reclass current deferred tax liabilities to non-current deferred tax liabilities

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,067)

 

 

 —

Current liabilities, as restated

$

1,448,819 

 

$

1,344,447 

 

$

1,288,235 

 

$

1,228,266 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets, as previously reported

$

4,042,441 

 

$

3,773,315 

 

$

3,397,438 

 

$

3,296,410 

Classification adjustments

 

(173,960)

 

 

(50,754)

 

 

(31,061)

 

 

(35,844)

Reclass non-current deferred tax assets to non-current deferred tax liabilities

 

(1,417)

 

 

(3,543)

 

 

(1)

 

 

(4,067)

Reclass deferred debt cost to long-term debt

 

(5,764)

 

 

(7,568)

 

 

(7,713)

 

 

(10,283)

Total assets, as restated

$

3,861,300 

 

$

3,711,450 

 

$

3,358,663 

 

$

3,246,216 

20


Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. For cautions about relying on such forward-looking statements, please refer to the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report immediately prior to Item 1. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Executive Overview

Consolidated revenue for 2016 was $5.0 billion compared to $4.9 billion for 2015. The modest improvement was attributable to higher volume in our Building segment, driven by various building projects primarily in California.

Consolidated revenue for 2015 was $4.9 billion compared to $4.5 billion for 2014. The growth was driven by increased volume in our Building and Civil segments, with various building projects in California and two large mass-transit projects in New York being the largest contributors.

Income from construction operations for 2016 was $201.9 million compared to $105.4 million for 2015. The strong increase was primarily due to significantly improved operating performance in all segments. The prior year included various unfavorable adjustments, as discussed in the next paragraph.

Income from construction operations for 2015 was $105.4 million compared to $241.7 million for 2014. The decrease was primarily due to significant project charges recorded for various Five Star Electric projects in New York in the Specialty Contractors segment, decreased activity on certain higher-margin civil projects, unfavorable adjustments related to the estimate of costs to complete an office building project in New York and the adverse Brightwater litigation-related charge for a legacy civil project.

The effective tax rate was 35.7%,  38.7% and 42.4% for 2016,  2015 and 2014, respectively. The 2016 rate was favorably impacted by rate changes associated with a shift in revenue mix between states affecting state apportionment, as well as various return-to-provision and deferred tax adjustments related to depreciation. The 2015 rate was favorably impacted by the resolution of certain state tax matters. The 2014 rate was unfavorably impacted by increased activity in higher state tax jurisdictions and higher non-deductible compensation expense.

Earnings per diluted share was $1.92,  $0.91 and $2.20 in 2016,  2015 and 2014, respectively. The strong earnings growth in 2016 was due to significantly improved operating performance in all segments, as discussed above. The primary reasons for the earnings decline in 2015 were the various above-mentioned unfavorable adjustments that impacted income from construction operations during that year.

Cash flow from operations was $113.3 million in 2016 compared to $14.1 million in 2015, and compared to a use of cash from operations of $56.7 million in 2014. The strong improvement in operating cash generation in 2016 was due to significant progress achieved on the Company’s initiative to focus on cash flow and the reduction of unbilled costs through more timely project billings and collections, and resolution and subsequent invoicing of unapproved change orders and claims. In 2016, for the first time in eight years, the Company’s cash flow from operations exceeded its net income for the year.

Consolidated new awards in 2016 were $3.7 billion compared to $4.6 billion in 2015 and $5.4 billion in 2014. The Civil and Building segments were the major contributors of new awards during 2016. The Building segment was the major contributor of new awards during 2015. New awards in 2014 were generally balanced across all three segments, with the Building segment contributing a modestly higher volume.

Consolidated backlog was $6.2 billion, $7.5 billion and $7.8 billion as of December 31, 2016,  2015 and 2014, respectively. The backlog at the end of 2016 was the result of revenue burn during the year that outpaced new awards in the Building and Specialty Contractors segments, and closely tracked new awards in the Civil segment. As of December 31, 2016, the mix of backlog by segment was approximately 43%,  32% and 25% for the Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors segments, respectively. The Company was awarded a $1.4 billion joint-venture mass-transit project in January 2017 that the Company will consolidate in its financial results starting in the first quarter of 2017. The backlog at the end of 2015 was primarily due to significant new awards in the Building segment, partially offset by revenue burn that outpaced new awards in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments.

21


Table of Contents

Projects in the Civil segment’s backlog typically convert to revenue over a period of three to five years, whereas projects for the Building and Specialty Contractors segments typically convert to revenue over a period of one to three years. We estimate that approximately $3.4 billion, or 54%,  of our backlog as of December 31, 2016 will be recognized as revenue in 2017.

The following table presents the changes in backlog in 2016:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Backlog at

 

 

 

Revenue

 

Backlog at



December 31,

 

New Awards

 

Recognized

 

December 31,

(in millions)

2015

 

in 2016 (a)

 

in 2016

 

2016

Civil

$

2,743.7 

 

$

1,597.4 

 

$

(1,669.0)

 

$

2,672.1 

Building

 

2,780.4 

 

 

1,270.6 

 

 

(2,069.8)

 

 

1,981.2 

Specialty Contractors

 

1,941.0 

 

 

867.1 

 

 

(1,234.3)

 

 

1,573.8 

Total

$

7,465.1 

 

$

3,735.1 

 

$

(4,973.1)

 

$

6,227.1 

(a)

New awards  consist of the original contract price of projects added to our backlog plus or minus subsequent changes to the estimated total contract price of existing contracts.

The outlook for our Company’s growth over the next several years is the most favorable it has been in many years, particularly in the Civil segment. In addition to our large volume of backlog, we expect significant new award activity based on long-term capital spending plans by various state, local and federal customers, and typically bipartisan support for infrastructure investments. In the November 2016 U.S. election, voters in numerous states approved dozens of transportation funding measures totaling approximately $200 billion in long-term funding. The largest of these were in Los Angeles County, where Measure M, a half-cent sales tax increase, was approved and is expected to generate $120 billion of funding over the next 40 years, and in Seattle, Washington, where Sound Transit 3 was passed and is expected to generate $54 billion of funding over the next 25 years for regional transportation projects. In addition, the Trump administration envisions a significant infrastructure investment program, has identified a priority list containing dozens of “emergency and national security” projects and is preparing to present its infrastructure plan for approval and funding. Furthermore, the $305-billion Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, which was approved in late 2015, is expected to provide state and local agencies with federal funding for numerous highway, bridge and mass-transit projects through 2020. Several large, long-duration civil infrastructure programs with which we are already involved are also progressing, such as California’s High-Speed Rail system and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s East Side Access project. Planning and permitting are also underway related to Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor Improvements, including the Gateway Program, which will eventually bring new rail tunnels beneath the Hudson River to connect service between New Jersey and New York’s Penn Station. Finally, sustained low interest rates and capital costs are expected to drive high demand and continued spending by private and public customers on building infrastructure projects.

For a more detailed discussion of operating performance of each business segment, corporate general and administrative expense and other items, see “Results of Segment Operations,” “Corporate, Tax and Other Matters” and “Liquidity and Financial Condition” below.

Results of Segment Operations

The Company provides professional services consisting of construction management, including specialty construction services involving electrical, mechanical, HVAC, plumbing and pneumatically placed concrete, to private and public customers primarily in the United States and its territories and in certain other international locations. The Company’s three principal business segments are as follows: Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors. For more information on these business segments, see “Item 1. – Business” above.

Civil Segment



Revenue and income from construction operations for the Civil segment are summarized as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in millions)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Revenue

$

1,889.9 

 

$

1,687.1 

 

$

1,441.4 

$

1,669.0 

 

$

1,889.9 

 

$

1,687.1 

Income from construction operations

 

145.2 

 

220.6 

 

177.7 

 

172.7 

 

145.2 

 

220.6 





Revenue for 2016 decreased 12% compared to 2015, principally due to the prior-year completion of a large runway reconstruction project in New York and reduced activity in 2016 on a platform project at Hudson Yards in New York, which is nearing completion. The decrease was partially offset by increased activity on various projects, including a large tunnel project in Seattle, Washington and a large mass-transit project in California. Revenue for 2015 increased 12% compared to 2014, principally due to progress on many

22


Table of Contents

projects in the New York area, including the CM006 and CS179 mass-transit projects, and increased activity on various bridge projects in the Midwest. This increase was partially offset by decreased activity on certain tunnel projects on the West Coast. Revenue for 2014

Income from construction operations increased 17%19% in 2016 compared to 2013, primarily driven by increased activity on2015, due to improved operating performance and because the Amtrak tunnel andprior-year results included the platform projects at Hudson Yards in New York, various mass-transit projects in California and New York, various bridge projects in the Midwest and New York, and a runway reconstruction project in New York. ThisBrightwater litigation-related charge of $23.9 million. The increase was partially offset by decreased activity on certain tunnel projects on the West Coast, certain highway projects onimpact of the East Coast and an airport parking apron project in Guam.

reduced volume discussed above. Income from construction operations declined 34% in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to reduced activity on certain higher-margin projects, the aforementioned Brightwater litigation-related charge, of $23.9 million, decreased activity on certain tunnel projects on the West Coast as well asand net favorable adjustments in 2014 of $16.5 million due to anticipated recoveries associated with two legal rulings. ThisThe decline was partially offset by increased activity, as well as favorable adjustments in 2015 totaling $13.7 million on athe runway reconstruction project in New York. Income from construction operations increased 24%

Operating margin was 10.3% in 20142016, compared to 2013.7.7% in 2015 and 13.1% in 2014. The increase in operating margin in 2016 was primarily due to the revenue increasereasons discussed above for 2014that impacted revenue and the net favorable adjustments in 2014 mentioned above to anticipated recoveries associated with two legal rulings. This increase was partially offset by reduced activity on certain higher-margin projects.

Operating margin was 7.7% in 2015, compared to 13.1% in 2014 and 12.3% in 2013.income from construction operations. The margin decline in 2015 and margin increase in 2014 werewas also due to the reasons discussed above regarding changes in revenue and income from construction operations. Excluding the Brightwater litigation-related charge and favorable adjustments for the runway project in New York, operating margin in 2015 was 8.2%. Excluding the net favorable adjustments mentioned above, operating margin was 12.2% in 2014. The higher operating margins in the 12% range in 2013 andOur 2014 were primarily driven byperformance benefitted from significant work performed on certain higher-margin projects.



New awards in the Civil segment totaled $1.6 billion in 2016, $1.1 billion in 2015 and $1.7 billion in 20142014. New awards in 2016 included a $663 million mass-transit project in New York, approximately $277 million of new bridge projects in the Midwest, the Company’s share of $244 million of additional contract scope for a mass-transit project in California, a $107 million highway project in Virginia and $3.0 billiona $97 million airport terminal expansion project in 2013.Guam. New awards in 2015 included a mass-transit project in New York valued at $80 million, highway projects in Delaware, Maryland and Pennsylvania valued at $70 million, $60 million and $58 million, respectively, and a tunnel extension project in New York worth $56 million. New awards in 2014 included two mass-transit projects in New York collectively valued at $844 million, a runway reconstruction project in New York valued at $243 million and three bridge projects in Wisconsin and Minnesota collectively valued at $181 million. New awards in 2013 included a mass-transit project valued at $840 million and our $511 million share of a joint-venture mass-transit project, both in California, a concrete and steel platform project in New York worth $510 million, our approximately $200 million share of a joint-venture bridge project between Minnesota and Wisconsin, two Wisconsin highway projects collectively valued at $191 million, and a $133 million tunnel project and $102 million bridge project, both in New York.



Backlog for the Civil segment was $2.7 billion as of December 31, 2016, consistent with $2.7 billion as of December 31, 2015 and compared to $3.6 billion as of December 31, 2014 and $3.5 billion as of December 31, 2013.2014. Civil segment backlog is expected to grow in early 2016,2017, primarily the result of a new award in January 20162017 for a $663 million$1.4 billion joint-venture mass-transit project in New York.Los Angeles that the Company will consolidate in its financial results starting in the first quarter of 2017. The segment continues to experience strong demand reflected in a large pipeline of prospective projects and supported by favorable budget trends,substantial anticipated funding associated with various transportation measures that were voter-approved during the November 2016 election; the Trump administration’s considerable, expected infrastructure investment program; public agencies’ long-term spending plansplans; and the recently enacted, five-year, $305-billion FAST Act. In particular, there are a number of large prospective civil projects expected to be bid beginning in the middle of 2016, with subsequent awards anticipated in the second half of the year or early 2017. The Civil segment is well positionedwell-positioned to capture its share of these prospective projects. However, theThe segment, however, faces continued strong competition, from various other firms, including occasional aggressive bids from foreign competitors.



21


Table of Contents

Building Segment



Revenue and income from construction operations for the Building segment are summarized as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in millions)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Revenue

$

1,802.5 

 

$

1,503.8 

 

$

1,552.0 

$

2,069.8 

 

$

1,802.5 

 

$

1,503.8 

(Loss) Income from construction operations

 

(1.2)

 

24.7 

 

24.5 

 

51.6 

 

(1.2)

 

24.7 





Revenue for 2016 increased  15% compared to 2015, principally due to increased activity on various commercial office, technology, health care, hospitality and gaming, and retail building projects in California. This increase was partially offset by the completion in 2015 of a hospitality and gaming project in Mississippi. Revenue for 2015 increased 20% compared to 2014, primarily driven by increased activity on various commercial office, technology, government, education and retail building projects in California. Revenue for 2014 decreased 3% compared to 2013, principally driven by decreased activity on hospitality and gaming projects in California, Arizona, Nevada, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania, health care projects in California, and a containerized housing project in Iraq. This decrease was partially offset by increased activity on certain mixed-use facility projects in New York (including Hudson Yards), California, and Louisiana, and an industrial project in California.



Income from construction operations declined 105%increased considerably in 20152016 compared to 2014, primarily2015, when the segment experienced a slight loss. The strong increase was due to improved operating performance and prior-year unfavorable adjustments, totaling $24.3 million, to the estimated cost to complete an office building project in New YorkYork. Income from construction operations declined in 2015 compared to 2014, primarily due to the above-mentioned unfavorable adjustments and favorable adjustments in 2014 totaling $11.4 million for a large hospitality and gaming project. Income from construction operations was stable in 2014 compared to 2013. There were also favorable adjustments in 2013 totaling $13.8 million for the same large hospitality and gaming project.



Operating margin was -0.1%2.5% in 2015,2016, compared to 1.6%(0.1)% in 20142015 and 1.6% in 2013.2014. The notable margin improvement in 2016 was due to the above-mentioned factors that drove the changes in revenue and income from construction operations. The margin decline in 2015 was principally due to the factors discussed above that caused the significant decline in income from construction operations. Excluding the impact of the above-mentioned unfavorable adjustments for the office building project, operating margin in 2015 was 1.3%. The higher operating margins in 2014 and 2013 were primarily driven by relatively stable revenue in both years, as well as the favorable adjustments mentioned above in both years. Excluding these favorable adjustments, operating margins in 2014 and 2013 were 0.9% and 0.7%, respectively.

 

23


Table of Contents

New awards in the Building segment totaled $1.3 billion in 2016, $2.4 billion in 2015 and $1.9 billion in 20142014. New awards in 2016 included a hospitality and $1.2 billiongaming project in 2013.California and another in Maryland, collectively valued at $372 million; a hospitality project in California valued at $120 million; and a multi-unit residential project in Florida valued at $72 million. New awards in 2015 included a technology research and development office facility project valued at $800 million and $230 million of incremental funding for a biotechnology facility project, both in California, and a hospitality building project in Pennsylvania worth $239 million. New awards in 2014 included a multi-unit residential tower project in Florida worth $255 million, two hospitality and gaming projects in Mississippi and California collectively valued at $225 million and a health care facility project in California valued at $211 million. New awards in 2013 included a concrete package for an office tower valued at $143 million and a bus station redevelopment project worth $100 million, both in New York.



Backlog for the Building segment was $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2016, compared to $2.8 billion as of December 31, 2015 compared toand $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2014 and $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2013.2014. The strong backlog growthdecline in 20152016 was due to the large volume ofstrong revenue burn that outpaced new awards especially for projects in California.during the year. The Building segment has a large volume of pending awards for projects in California and Florida, as well ascontinues to have a large pipeline of prospective projects.projects, some of which have already been bid and are expected to be selected and awarded by customers during the first half of 2017. Strong demand is expected to continue due to continuedongoing customer spending, supported by sustaineda low interest rates.rate environment. The Building segment is well positionedwell-positioned to capture its share of prospective projects based on its strong customer relationships and a long-term reputation for excellence in delivering high-quality projects on time and within budget. The Company expects the Building segment to experience strong revenue growth and return to profitability in 2016. The increased backlog in 2014 was due to a large volume of new awards primarily in California and Florida.



Specialty Contractors Segment



Revenue and income from construction operations for the Specialty Contractors segment are summarized as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in millions)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Revenue

$

1,228.0 

 

$

1,301.4 

 

$

1,182.3 

$

1,234.3 

 

$

1,228.0 

 

$

1,301.4 

Income from construction operations

 

15.7 

 

51.0 

 

49.0 

 

37.9 

 

15.7 

 

51.0 





Revenue for 2016 increased slightly compared to 2015. Increased activity on two electrical projects in the western United States and electrical projects in New York was mostly offset by decreased activity on various mechanical projects in New York. Revenue for 2015 decreased 6% compared to 2014, primarily due to decreased activity on various smaller electrical projects in the southern United States that have beenwere impacted in 2015 by the low price of oil, electrical projects at the World Trade Center and mechanicmechanical projects at the United Nations in New York. This decrease was partially offset by increased activity on various electrical projects at Hudson Yards, two large mass-transit projects and various other electrical, mechanical and concrete placement projects, all in New York. Revenue for 2014

Income from construction operations increased 10%141% in 2016 compared to 2013, principally driven by increased activity on2015 because 2015 included unfavorable adjustments totaling $45.6 million for various mechanical projects on the East Coast, two signal system modernizationFive Star Electric projects in New York, and various electrical projects in the southern United States. This increase was partially offset by Hurricane Sandy-related projects performed.

22


Tablenone of Contents

which were individually material. Income from construction operations declined 69% in 2015 compared to 2014, primarily due to the aforementioned unfavorable adjustments totaling $45.6 million on variousrelated to Five Star Electric projects in New York, none of which were individually material. Nearly all of these projects are complete or nearing completion. Income from construction operations increased 4% in 2014 compared to 2013. This increase was principally the result of the 2014 revenue growth discussed above and improved financial performance in two business units. This increase was partially offset by a favorable settlement in 2013 related to a large hospitality and gaming electrical subcontract.Electric.



Operating margin was 3.1% in 2016,  compared to 1.3% in 2015 compared toand 3.9% in 20142014. The margin improvement in 2016 was due to the factors mentioned above that impacted income from construction operations. In addition, throughout 2016, management focused on improving operational performance at its Five Star Electric and 4.1%WDF business units in 2013.New York and, as a result, considered it a transitional year for the Specialty Contractors segment. The operational improvement is reflected in the segment’s increased income from construction operations and operating margin. Further operating margin improvement is anticipated for the segment in 2017. The margin decline in 2015 was principally due to the aforementioned unfavorable adjustments on variousat Five Star Electric projects. Excluding the impact of these adjustments, operating margin in 2015 was 4.8%.Electric.



New awards in the Specialty Contractors segment totaled $867 million in 2016, $1.1 billion in 2015 and $1.7 billion in 20142014. New awards in 2016 included various mechanical projects in New York collectively valued at approximately $146 million, several electrical projects in the southern United States totaling approximately $93 million and $1.3 billionan electrical subcontract for a mass-transit project in 2013.New York valued at $86 million. New awards in 2015 included an electrical subcontract valued at $90 million for a mass-transit project in New York and an electrical subcontract valued at $73 million for a Hudson Yards office tower in New York. New awards in 2014 included a $321 million electrical subcontract for a mass-transit project in New York and two contracts totaling $175 million for electrical work on other mass-transit projects in New York and California. New awards in 2013 included two electrical contracts for an office tower and the platform at Hudson Yards, collectively valued at $82 million.



Backlog for the Specialty Contractors segment was $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2016, compared to $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2015 compared toand $2.1 billion as of December 31, 2014 and $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2013.2014. The Specialty Contractors segment has a significant pipeline of prospective projects, with demand for its services supported by strong continued spending on civil and building projects. The Specialty Contractors segment is well positionedwell-positioned to capture its share of prospective projects based on the size and scale of our business units that operate in New York, Texas, Florida and California and the strong reputation held by these business units for high-quality work on larger, complex projects. The increased backlog in 2014 was due to a large volume of new awards, particularly for mass-transit projects in New York.



24


Table of Contents

Corporate, Tax and Other Matters



Corporate General and Administrative Expense



Corporate general and administrative expenses waswere $60.2 million in 2016, $54.2 million in 2015 and $54.6 million in 20142014. The higher corporate general and $47.4 millionadministrative expenses in 2013.2016 were predominantly due to increased compensation expense attributable to improved financial results and the hiring of several key executives. In 2015, there was lower performance-based incentive compensation expense compared to 2014, but it was offset by increased depreciation expense. The lower corporate general and administrative expense in 2013 compared to 2014 was primarily due to lower performance-based incentive compensation expense.2014.



Other Income (Expense), Interest Expense and Provision for Income Taxes





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in millions)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Other income (expense), net

$

12.5 

 

$

(9.5)

 

$

(18.6)

$

7.0 

 

$

13.6 

 

$

(8.2)

Interest expense

 

(44.0)

 

(44.7)

 

 

(45.6)

 

(59.8)

 

(45.1)

 

 

(46.0)

Provision for income taxes

 

(28.5)

 

(79.5)

 

 

(52.3)

 

(53.3)

 

(28.5)

 

 

(79.5)



Other income, (expense), net, decreased by $6.6 million in 2016 compared to 2015, and improved by $22.0$21.8 million in 2015 compared to 2014, and by $9.1 million2014. Other income in 2014 compared2015 included adjustments to 2013. The improvement in both years was primarily due to decreases indecrease contingent earn-out liabilities related to prior business acquisitions. Other expense in 2014 included earn-out expense related to past business acquisitions.

Interest expense increased $14.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the prior year. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 was comparable to 2014. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to cash and non-cash interest expense related to the Convertible Notes issued in June 2016, as well as an increase in non-cash interest expense associated with fees related to two amendments to the Company’s 2014 Credit Facility. The year ended December 31, 2016 was also impacted by higher net borrowing rates, which were 78 basis points higher compared to the same period in 2015, partially offset by a $21.4 million reduction in the Company’s average year-over-year borrowings. 



The effective income tax rate was 35.7% for 2016, 38.7% for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared toand 42.4% for 2014.  The effective tax rate for 2016 compared to 2015 was favorably impacted by rate changes associated with a shift in revenue mix between states affecting state apportionment, as well as various return-to-provision and depreciation adjustments. The largest contributor to the decreased tax rate in 2015 compared to 2014 was the resolution of certain state tax matters. The effective income tax rate was 42.4% for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to 37.5% for 2013. The largest contributor to the higher tax rate in 2014 was increased net income and increased activity in higher state tax jurisdictions. Higher non‑deductible compensation expense also contributed to this increase.

  

23


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Financial Condition



Liquidity is provided by available cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations, credit facilities and access to capital markets. We have a committed line of credit totaling $300 million, which may be used for revolving loans, letters of credit and/or general purposes. We believe that for at least the next 12 months, cash generated from operations, along with our unused credit capacity of $141.8$147.3 million and cash position, is sufficient to support operating requirements. Additionally, over the long-term we may from time to time use excess cash to repurchase our debt.



Cash and Working Capital



Cash and cash equivalents were $146.1 million as of December 31, 2016 compared to $75.5 million as of December 31, 2015 compared to $135.6 million as2015. These were comprised of December 31, 2014, with balances including cash held by us and available for general corporate purposes of $18.4$49.5 million and $40.8$18.5 million, respectively, and our proportionate share of cash held by joint ventures, available only for joint venture-relatedjoint-venture-related uses including distributions to joint joint‑venture partners of $57.0$96.6 million and $94.7$57.0 million, respectively. In addition, our restricted cash, held primarily to secure insurance-related contingent obligations, was $45.9 million and $44.4$50.5 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.2016, compared to $45.9 million as of December 31, 2015.



During the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities was $113.3 million ($108.8 million of which was generated in the third and fourth quarters), due primarily to favorable operating results, somewhat offset by changes in net investment in working capital. The change in working capital primarily reflects increases in accounts receivable (both trade accounts receivable and retention) related to billing activity, offset by a reduction of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings, which management is continuing to resolve and collect. In 2016, for the first time in eight years, the Company’s cash flow from operations exceeded its net income for the year. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we generated $14.1 million in cash was provided from operating activities. This wasactivities, primarily due to final payments related to a settlement of a disputecash generated from earnings sources being mostly offset by increased net investment in working capital.

The $99.3 million improvement in cash flow from operations for the CityCenter project in Las Vegas and on a settlement relatedyear ended December 31, 2016 compared to another completed building project. During the year we also funded significantended December 31, 2015 is reflective of improved year-over-year profitability and lower net investment in working capital associated with claims and unapproved change orders which was partially offset by an increaseresulting from a significant reduction in accounts payable. We are focused on increasing our available cash and improving our liquidity by resolving various claims and unapproved change orders, as well as billing and collecting other amounts in costcosts and estimated earnings in excess of billings. We utilized $32.4 millionThe improvement in cash from investing activities due mainlygeneration in 2016 compared to

25


Table of Contents

2015 is even more pronounced when considering there were significant collections by the Company in the first quarter of 2015 related to the purchasesettlements of construction equipment. We used $41.8 millionpast disputes over the CityCenter project in cash from financing activities, due primarily to borrowings under our revolving facility offset by cash used for scheduled debt repayments.Las Vegas, Nevada and a hospital project in Santa Monica, California.



During 2014,2016, we used $56.7$18.5 million in cash from operating activities due primarily to the timing of collections in the Specialty and Building segments and cash payments for interest on our outstanding debt and income taxes. We used $27.0 million in cash from investing activities, due primarily to the purchaseacquisition of constructionproperty and equipment, compared to the use of cash of $32.4 million for investing activities during 2015, which was primarily related to the acquisition of property and equipment of $75.0$35.9 million, offset by the$5.0 million in proceeds from the sale of our auction rate securitiesproperty and equipment.

During 2016, we utilized $24.2 million of $44.5 million, and proceeds from the sale of construction equipment of $5.3 million. We received $99.3 million in cash from financing activities, primarily due primarily to the net paydown of debt and the payment of $15.1 million in debt issuance costs associated with two amendments to the 2014 Credit Facility and the issuance of $200.0 million of Convertible Notes. The net proceeds from the Convertible Notes were used to prepay $125.0 million of the borrowings outstanding under our revolving facility offset by cash used for scheduled debt repaymentsTerm Loan, pay down $69.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our 2014 Revolver and business acquisition related payments.

During 2013, we generated $50.7pay $6.0 million in cash from operating activities, due primarily to earnings sources and payments receivedof fees related to the CityCenter matter, offset byoffering. Net cash paidused in financing activities for interest and taxes and payments related2015 was $41.8 million, which was primarily due to the Brightwater matter. We used $43.6 million in cash from investing activities, due primarily topay down of debt under the purchase of construction equipment of $42.4 million. We used $55.2 million in cash from financing activities, due primarily to net debt repayments of $23.5 million and business acquisition related payments of $31.0 million.2014 Credit Facility. 



As of December 31, 2015,2016, we had working capital of $1.3 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.87 and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.49 compared to working capital of $1.2 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.791.80 and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.58 compared to working capital of $1.1 billion, and a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.82 and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.63 at December 31, 2014.2015.



Debt



Senior Notes2014 Credit Facility



In October 2010,Under our 2014 Revolver, we issued $300had outstanding borrowings of $152.5 million as of 7.625% senior unsecured notes (the “Senior Notes”) due November 1, 2018 and received proceeds of $293 million, net of debt discounts and issuance costs. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. We may redeem the Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 101.9 percent of their principal amount prior to OctoberDecember 31, 2016 and subsequently without a redemption premium. However, if a change$158.0 million as of control triggering event occurs, as defined by the terms of the indenture, we are required to offer to redeem the notes at a redemption price equal to 101 percent of their principal amount. At the date of any redemption, any accrued and unpaid interest is also due. In addition, the indenture for the Senior Notes provides for customary events of default such as restrictionsDecember 31, 2015. The 2014 Revolver balances reported on the paymentConsolidated Balance Sheets as of dividendsDecember 31, 2016 and share repurchases.2015 include unamortized debt issuance cost of $4.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively. We utilized the 2014 Revolver for letters of credit in the amount of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.



Credit Agreement – Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan

InOn June 5, 2014, the Company entered into a Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Original Facility,” with subsequent amendments discussed herein, the “2014 Credit Facility”), restructuring its former $300 million Revolvingwith Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. The 2014 Credit Facility and $200 million Term Loan, and providingprovides for a $300 million revolving credit facility and(the “2014 Revolver”), a $250 million term loan (the “Original Term“Term Loan”), both originally and a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit up to the aggregate amount of $150 million, all maturing on June 5, 2019. The obligationsMay 1, 2018. Borrowings under both the 2014 Revolver and the Term Loan bear interest based either on Bank of America’s prime lending rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), each plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% to 3.00% contingent upon the latest Consolidated Leverage Ratio.

During the first half of 2016, the Company entered into two amendments to the Original Facility are secured by a lien(the “Amendments”): Waiver and Amendment No. 1, entered into on substantially all realFebruary 26, 2016 (“Amendment No. 1”), and personal propertyConsent and Amendment No. 2, entered into on June 8, 2016 (“Amendment No. 2”). In Amendment No. 1, the lenders waived the Company’s violation of the Companyits consolidated leverage ratio covenant and its subsidiaries party thereto. See Note 5 ofconsolidated fixed charge coverage ratio covenant. These violations were the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion of the terms of the Original Facility.

24


Table of Contents

Amended Credit Agreement

As a result of the Company’s financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which included the previously reported $23.9 million non-cash, pre-tax charge fromrelated to an adverse ruling on the Brightwater litigation matter in the third quarter of 2015, as well as $45.6 million of pre-tax charges in the third and fourth quarters of 2015 for various Five Star Electric projects. In Amendment No. 2, the lenders consented to the issuance of the Convertible Notes subject to certain conditions, including the prepayment of $125 million on the Term Loan and the paydown of $69 million on the 2014 Revolver, and consented to a potential sale transaction of one of the Company’s business units in its Building segment, which the Company waslater decided not to sell.

In addition to the Amendments’ provisions discussed above, the Amendments also modified other provisions and added new provisions to the Original Facility, and Amendment No. 2 superseded and modified some of the provisions of Amendment No. 1. The following reflects the more significant changes to the Original Facility and the results of the Amendments that are now reflected in the 2014 Credit Facility. Unless otherwise noted, the changes below were primarily the result of Amendment No. 1: (1) The Company may utilize LIBOR-based borrowings. (Amendment No. 1 precluded the use of LIBOR-based borrowings until the Company filed its compliance certificate for the fourth quarter of 2016; however, Amendment No. 2 negated this preclusion.) (2) The Company is subject to an increased rate on borrowings, with such rate being 100 basis points higher than the requiredhighest rate under the Original Facility if the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 3.50:1.00 but not more than 4.00:1.00, and an additional 100 basis points higher if the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 4.00:1.00. (3) The Company will be subject to increased commitment fees if the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 3.50:1.00. (4) The impact of the Brightwater litigation matter in the third quarter of 2015 is to be excluded from the calculation of the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio undercovenants. (5) Interest payments are due on a monthly basis; however, if the Company is in compliance with its consolidated leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio covenants provided in the Original Facility as of December 31, 2016, the timing of interest payments will revert to the terms of the Original Facility. As of December 31,

26


Table of Contents

2016, the Company is in compliance with its consolidated leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio covenants provided in the Original Facility and the timing of our interest payments reverted back to the terms of the Original Facility, quarterly for the Term Loan and base rate borrowings and upon maturity for Eurodollar borrowings. (6) The accordion feature of the Original Facility, which are both calculatedwould have allowed either an increase of $300 million in the 2014 Revolver or the establishment of one or more new term loan commitments, is no longer available. (7) The Company’s maximum allowable consolidated leverage ratio was increased to 4.25:1.00 for the first, second and third quarters of 2016 after which it returns to the Original Facility’s range of 3.25:1.00 to 3.00:1.00. (Amendment No. 1 increased the Company’s maximum allowable consolidated leverage ratio covenant requirements to 4.25:1.00 for the first quarter of 2016 and 4.0:1.0 for the second and third quarters of 2016. Amendment No. 2 increased the maximum allowable consolidated leverage ratio covenant requirements to 4.25:1.00 for the second and third quarters of 2016.) (8) The Company is subject to additional covenants regarding its liquidity, including a cap on the cash balance in the Company’s bank account and a weekly minimum liquidity requirement (based on specified available cash balances and availability under the 2014 Revolver). (9) The Company is required to achieve certain cumulative quarterly cash collection milestones, which were eased somewhat in Amendment No. 2. (10) The Company is required to make additional quarterly principal payments, which will be applied to the Term Loan balloon payment, with some of the payments based on a rolling fourpercentage of certain forecasted cash collections for the prior quarter. This change was effective in the fourth quarter basis.of 2016. (11) The lenders’ collateral package was increased by pledging to the lenders (i) the equity interests of each direct domestic subsidiary of the Company and (ii) 65% of the stock of each material first-tier foreign restricted subsidiary of the Company. (12) The 2014 Credit Facility will now mature on May 1, 2018, as opposed to June 5, 2019, the maturity date of the Original Facility.



The table below presents our actual and required consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio and consolidated leverage ratio under the Original2014 Credit Facility for the December 31, 2015 quarter:period, which are calculated on a four-quarter rolling basis:







 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

For the quarter endedTwelve Months Ended December 31, 20152016



 

Actual

 

Required

Fixed charge coverage ratio

 

1.112.08 : 1.00

 

> or = 1.25 : 1.00

Leverage ratio

 

4.812.79 : 1.00

 

< or = 3.503.25 : 1.00



On February 26, 2016, we entered into Waiver and Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Original Facility (collectively, the “Credit Facility”) with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. In the Amendment, the lenders waived these covenant violations and modified certain provisions of the Original Facility. As a result of the Amendment, both the Revolver and the Term Loan will now mature on May 1, 2018. The Term Loan principal payments have also been modified to include certain additional principal payments which will be applied against the balloon payment. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, based either on Bank of America’s prime lending rate, plus an applicable margin, or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus an applicable margin. Under the terms of the Amendment, for so long as the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 3.5:1.0, it will not be permitted to make LIBOR-based borrowings under the Revolver and will be subject to an increased interest rate on borrowings. The interest rate will be 100 to 200 basis points higher than the highest pricing tier under the Original Facility depending on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. The Company also will be subject to increased commitment fees at these higher leverage ratio levels. The Amendment removes the accordion feature of the Original Facility, which would have allowed for additional borrowings of up to $300 million.

The Amendment also modifies several of the covenants in the Original Facility, including the Company’s maximum allowable consolidated leverage ratio to be at 4.25:1.00 in the first quarter of 2016, stepping down to 4.00:1.00 in the second and third quarters of 2016 and then returning to the Original Facility’s range of 3.25:1.00 to 3.00:1.00 beginning with the fourth quarter of 2016. The Credit Facility will continue to require the Company to maintain a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1.00. Other usual and customary covenants for credit facilities of this type (such as, restrictions on the payment of dividends and share repurchases) were carried over from the Original Facility (subject to certain modifications made in the Amendment).The Amendment adds covenants regarding the Company’s liquidity, including a cap on the cash balance in the Company’s bank account and a weekly minimum liquidity requirement (based on specified available cash balances and availability under the Revolver). The Amendment also requires the Company to achieve certain quarterly cash collection milestones and increases the lenders’ collateral package.

Please refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion for the terms of the Amendment.

The Term Loan balance was $223.8 million at December 31, 2015. The next quarterly Term Loan payment under the Credit Facility is due and payable in March of 2016.

We had $158.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our Revolver as of December 31, 2015 and $130.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our Revolver as of December 31, 2014. We utilized the Revolver for letters of credit in the amount of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2015 and $1.0 million under the Revolver as of December 31, 2014. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2015, we had $141.8 million available to borrow under the Revolver

There were no other material changes in our contractual debt obligations as of December 31, 2015. As of the filing date of this Form 10-K and giving effect to the Amendment, we are in compliance and expect to continue to be in compliance with the modified financial covenants under the 2014 Credit Facility.

2010 Senior Notes

In October 2010, the Company issued $300 million of 7.625% Senior Notes due November 1, 2018, (the “2010 Notes”) in a private placement offering. Interest on the 2010 Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The Company may redeem the 2010 Notes at par beginning on November 1, 2016, which was not exercised as of December 31, 2016. At the date of any redemption, any accrued and unpaid interest would also be due.

Convertible Notes

On June 15, 2016, we completed an offering of $200 million of 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2021 (the “Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on December 15, 2016, until the maturity date. We used the proceeds to prepay $125.0 million of our Term Loan, pay down $69.0 million of our 2014 Revolver, and pay $6.0 million of fees related to the offering. For additional information regarding the terms of our Convertible Notes, refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 2016, none of the conversion provisions of our Convertible Notes have been triggered.



Equipment financing and mortgages



We haveThe Company has certain loans entered into for the purchase of specific property, plant and equipment and secured by the assets purchased. The aggregate balance of equipment financing loans was approximately $70.6$84.9 million and $102.0$115.6 million at December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively, with interest rates ranging from 2.12%1.90% to 4.85% and scheduled5.93% with equal monthly installment payments of principal and interest over periods up to five years.ten years with additional balloon payments of $12.4 million in 2021 and $6.3 million in 2022 on the remaining loans outstanding at December 31, 2016. The aggregate balance of transportation equipment financingmortgage loans was approximately $45.0$16.7 million and $40.6$17.7 million at December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively, with interest rates ranging from a fixed 3.35%2.50% to the London Interbank Offered RateLIBOR plus 3% and equal monthly installment payments over periods up to seven years with additional balloon payments of $2.6 million in 2018, $2.9 million in 2021 and $6.7 million in 2023.

2527

 


 

Table of Contents

 

(“LIBOR”) plus 3% and equal monthly installment payments over periods up to ten years and final balloon payments of $12.4 million in 2021 and $6.2 million in 2022 on the remaining loans outstanding at December 31, 2015. The aggregate balance of mortgage loans was approximately $17.7 million and $18.9 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, with interest rates based on LIBOR plus applicable margins up to 3% or prime less 1.0%, depending on the loan, and equal monthly installment payments of periods up to ten years with additional balloon payments of $5.6 million in 2016, $2.6 million in 2018 and $6.7 million in 2023.

During 2011, we issued approximately $21.7 million of 5% promissory notes in conjunction with an acquisition. We paid all outstanding principal and accrued interest on these notes in 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



None



Contractual Obligations



Our outstanding contractual obligations as of December 31, 20152016 are summarized in the following table:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Payments Due

Contractual Obligations

Total

 

1 year or less

 

2-3 years

 

4-5 years

 

Over 5 years

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt(a)

$

815,591 

 

$

85,890 

 

$

490,877 

 

$

224,301 

 

$

14,523 

Interest on debt(a)

 

144,383 

 

 

55,677 

 

 

60,080 

 

 

28,328 

 

 

298 

Operating leases

 

78,677 

 

 

22,950 

 

 

23,594 

 

 

12,873 

 

 

19,260 

Pension benefit payments(b)

 

2,883 

 

 

2,883 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Other

 

7,883 

 

 

3,011 

 

 

4,872 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total

$

1,049,417 

 

$

170,411 

 

$

579,423 

 

$

265,502 

 

$

34,081 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations

Total

 

1 year or less

 

2-3 years

 

4-5 years

 

Over 5 years

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt (a)

$

823,448 

 

$

88,917 

 

$

531,583 

 

$

174,614 

 

$

28,334 

Interest on debt(a)

 

151,487 

 

 

49,811 

 

 

78,073 

 

 

15,313 

 

 

8,290 

Operating leases

 

106,654 

 

 

26,819 

 

 

35,436 

 

 

19,472 

 

 

24,927 

Acquisition-related liabilities

 

29,134 

 

 

 —

 

 

29,134 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Pension benefit payments

 

33,646 

 

 

1,815 

 

 

3,630 

 

 

3,630 

 

 

24,571 

Other

 

747 

 

 

445 

 

 

302 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total

$

1,145,116 

 

$

167,807 

 

$

678,158 

 

$

213,029 

 

$

86,122 

(a)

Debt and interest on debt payments reflect the terms of the Amendment.Amendments and excludes unamortized debt discount and deferred issuance costs. Amounts for interest on debt are based on interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2015.2016.

(b)

The Company utilizes current actuarial assumptions in determining the expected 2017 contributions to fund our defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans. Contributions beyond one year have not been included because, in management’s judgment, amounts beyond one year cannot be reliably estimated.



28


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies



Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are based on information available through the date of the issuance of the financial statements; accordingly, actual results in future periods could differ from these estimates. Significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements apply to the following critical accounting policies:



Method of Accounting for Contracts — Contract revenue is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method based on contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost. The estimates used in the percentage-of-completion method during the contract performance period require judgment and assumptions regarding both future events and the evaluation of contingencies such as the impact of change orders, liability claims, other contract disputes, the achievement of contractual performance standards, and potential variances in project schedule and costs. Changes to the total estimated contract cost, either due to unexpected events or revisions to management’s initial estimates, for a given project are recognized in the period in which they are determined.



In certain instances, we provide guaranteed completion dates and/or achievement of other performance criteria. Failure to meet schedule or performance guarantees could result in unrealized incentive fees and/or liquidated damages. In addition, depending on the type of contract, unexpected increases in contract cost related to the remediation of deficiencies can resultmay be unrecoverable, resulting in non-recoverabletotal cost which could exceedexceeding revenue realized from the projects. The Company generally provides limited warranties for work performed, with warranty periods typically extending for a limited duration following substantial completion of the Company’s work on a project. Historically, warranty claims have not resulted in material costs incurred.



Claims arising from construction contracts have been made against the Company by customers, and the Company has made claims against customers for cost incurred in excess of current contract provisions. The Company recognizes revenue, but not profit, for certain significant claims when it is determined that recovery of incurred cost is probable and the amounts can be reliably estimated. These requirements are satisfied under GAAP’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-35-25 when the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim, additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date

26


Table of Contents

and not the result of deficiencies in the Company’s performance, claim-related costs are identifiable and considered reasonable in view of the work performed, and evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable.



Recoverability of Goodwill AsGoodwill represents the excess of December 31, 2015,amounts paid over the fair value of net assets acquired from an acquisition. In order to determine the amount of goodwill resulting from an acquisition, we perform an assessment to determine the value of the acquired company's tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities. In our assessment, we determine whether identifiable intangible assets exist, which typically include backlog, customer relationships and trade name.

We test goodwill balance was $585.0 million. Goodwill is not amortized to earnings, but instead is reviewed for impairment annually for each reporting unit in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change which suggest that goodwill should be evaluated. Such events or circumstances include significant changes in legal factors and business climate, recent losses at a reporting unit, and industry trends, among other factors. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level annually, or more often if therebelow an operating segment. Our impairment tests are indicators betweenperformed at the annual review dates that signal thatoperating segment level as they represent our reporting units.

The impairment test is probable. The Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors segments each represent a reporting unit. We perform our annual quantitative impairment assessment duringtwo-step process. During the fourth quarter of each year using an income approach (discounted cash flow method) and a market approach. The income approach is based on assumptions about future events including the positive impact of the FAST Act, the strength and growth of the U.S. economy and the overall backlog of domestic projects. Accordingly,first step, we estimate the fair value of the reporting units could be negatively impacted by competition seekingunit using income and market approaches, and compare that amount to benefit from the increased growth in construction incarrying value of that reporting unit. In the United States and/or delays in the bidding or awarding of contracts caused by issues related to economic, political or other bureaucratic factors. In addition,event the fair valuesvalue of the reporting units couldunit is determined to be positively impacted by an expedited award cycle driven byless than the needcarrying value, a second step is required. The second step requires us to address critical domestic infrastructure issues and/or an improvement inperform a hypothetical purchase allocation for that reporting unit and to compare the U.S. economy that exceedsresulting current expectations. The market approach is based on assumptions about how market data relates to the Company. Future deviations from our assumptions or the use of different assumptions could have a material impact on our valuations. Lastly, we assess the reasonableness of the estimatedimplied fair value of the goodwill to the current carrying value of the goodwill for that reporting unit. In the event that the current implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized.

During the fourth quarter, we conducted our annual goodwill impairment test. The impairment evaluation process includes, among other things, making assumptions about variables such as revenue growth rates, profitability, discount rates, and industry market multiples, which are subject to a high degree of judgment.

Material assumptions used in the impairment analysis included the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). As of October1, 2016, changes of 0.5% in the WACC rate would have resulted in changes in the fair value of reporting units by comparingranging from $(30) million to $35 million, which would not have changed the estimated implied control premium forconclusions reached in our Company to observable market information. The quantitative assessment performed in 2015 resulted in an estimated fair value for each of our reporting units that exceeded their respective net book values; therefore, noannual goodwill impairment charge was necessary for 2015.  A summary of key information and assumptions related to our 2015 quantitative impairment assessment is as follows:test.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015 Quantitative Impairment Assessment
Key Information and Assumptions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty

Reporting Units

 

Civil

 

Building

 

Contractors

Net book value of Goodwill at October 1, 2015 (in millions)

 

$

415.3 

 

 

$

13.5 

 

 

$

156.2 

 

Fair value of reporting unit in excess of its net book value

 

 

15 

%

 

 

12 

%

 

 

13 

%

Weighting applied to income approach (a)

 

 

67 

%

 

 

100 

%

 

 

67 

%

Weighting applied to market approach (a)

 

 

33 

%

 

 

%

 

 

33 

%

Key assumptions used in income approach:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate(b)

 

 

13.5 

%

 

 

14.5 

%

 

 

14.5 

%

Average revenue growth rates for 2016 through 2020

 

 

2.3 

%

 

 

3.7 

%

 

 

3.1 

%

Terminal growth rate

 

 

2.5 

%

 

 

2.5 

%

 

 

2.5 

%

Key assumptions used in market approach:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EBITDA(c) multiple

 

 

4.7 

 

 

 

4.5 

 

 

 

5.9 

 

EBIT(c) multiple

 

 

5.1 

 

 

 

4.9 

 

 

 

7.5 

 

Control premium

 

 

25 

%

 

 

25 

%

 

 

25 

%


(a)

The weighing applied to the income approach reflects its correlation to each reporting unit’s economics.

(b)

A change in discount rate of 0.5% would have resulted in changes in the fair values of the reporting units ranging from -3.8% to 7.7%.

(c)

EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBIT is defined as earnings before interest and taxes.



New Accounting Pronouncements — For discussion of recently adopted accounting standards and updates, see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

  

2729

 


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK



Interest rate risk is our primary market risk exposure. Borrowing under our Credit Agreement and certain other debt obligations have variable interest rates and are therefore subject to interest rate risk. As of December 31, 2015,2016, we had approximately $374.7$211.3 million of net borrowings with variable interest rates, after excluding borrowings with effective fixed interest rates due to an interest rate swap agreement.rates. If short-term floating interest rates were to increase by 0.50%, interest on these borrowings would increase by approximately $1.9$1.1 million.

  

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA



The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Schedules are set forth in Item 15 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

  

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE



None.

  

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures — An evaluation, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 20152016 was made under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2015,2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act were recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.



Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting — Our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(f). In designing and evaluating our system of internal control over financial reporting, we recognize that inherent limitations exist in any control system no matter how well designed and operated, and we can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In making this assessment, management utilized the criteria issued in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issuedby the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission.  Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2015,2016, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.



Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2016. This report appears on page 2931 of this Form 10-K.



Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting — There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

2830

 


 

Table of Contents

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Tutor Perini Corporation

Sylmar, California



We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Tutor Perini Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2015,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.



We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.



Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.



We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20152016 of the Company and our report dated February 29, 201623, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



Los Angeles, California



February 29, 201623, 2017



2931

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting — There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION



Amended Credit Agreement

We are party to the Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Facility (the “Original Facility”) providing a $300 million revolving credit facility and a $250 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. On February 26, 2016, we entered into Waiver and Amendment No. 1 to the Original Facility (the “Amendment” together with the Original Agreement, the “Credit Facility”), providing the Company with certain waivers and amending certain material terms of the Original Facility, including increasing the applicable margin for determining the interest rate that the Company pays on borrowings under the Credit Facility, reducing the term of the Credit Facility by one year to May 1, 2018, modifying certain covenants and other provisions, including the consolidated leverage ratio covenant, and adding certain other provisions, including certain liquidity requirements, and adjusting principal amortization on the Term Loan. The Amendment also requires the Company to achieve certain quarterly cash collection milestones and increases the lenders’ collateral package. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion for the terms of the Amendment. 

The foregoing description of the Amendment does not constitute a complete summary and is qualified by reference in its entirety to the full text of the Amendment, a copy which is filed herewith as Exhibit 10.14.

None.  

PART III.



ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE



The information required by this Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2015.2016.

  

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION



The information required by this Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2015.2016.

  

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS



The information required by this Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2015.2016.

  

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE



The information required by this Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2015.2016.

  

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES



The information required by this Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2015.2016.  

  

3032

 


 

Table of Contents

 

PART IV.



ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES



TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



1.

1.            Financial Statements:

Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20152016 and 20142015 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20152016 and the notes thereto, together with the report of the independent registered public accounting firm on those consolidated financial statements are hereby filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, beginning on page F-1.



2.

2.           Financial Statement Schedules:

All consolidated financial statement schedules are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and in the Notes thereto.



3.

3.           Exhibits:



EXHIBIT INDEX



The following designated exhibits are, as indicated below, either filed herewith or have heretofore been filed with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Act of 1934 and are referred to and incorporated herein by reference to such filings.





 

Exhibit 2.

Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 2, 2008, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, Trifecta Acquisition LLC, Tutor-Saliba Corporation, Ronald N. Tutor and shareholders of Tutor-Saliba Corporation signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2008).

2.2

Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 28, 2008, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, Trifecta Acquisition LLC, Tutor-Saliba Corporation, Ronald N. Tutor and shareholders of Tutor-Saliba Corporation signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2008).

2.3

Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 1, 2011 by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, Lunda Construction Company, and each of the Shareholders of Lunda Construction Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2011). Exhibits, schedules (or similar attachments) to the Stock Purchase Agreement are not filed. The Company will furnish a copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

2.4

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated July 1, 2011 by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, GreenStar Services Corporation, Galaxy Merger, Inc., and GreenStar IH Rep LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2011). Exhibits, schedules (or similar attachments) to the Agreement and Plan of Merger are not filed. The Company will furnish a copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

Exhibit Exhibit��3.

Articles of Incorporation and By-laws

3.1

Restated Articles of Organization (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form10-KForm 10-K (File No. 001-06314) filed on March 31, 1997).

3.33.2

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2000.)

3.43.3

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 11, 2008.)

3.53.4

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-Q8-K filed on August 10, 2009).

3.63.5

SecondThird Amended and Restated By-laws of Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13.5 to Form 8-K10-Q filed on November 24, 2009)August 2, 2016).

Exhibit 4.

Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

4.1

Shareholders Agreement, dated April 2, 2008, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, Ronald N. Tutor and the shareholders of Tutor-Saliba Corporation signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2008).

31


Table of Contents

4.2

Amendment No. 1 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2010, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor, as shareholder representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2010).

4.3

Amendment No. 2 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2011, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor, as shareholder representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2011).

4.4

Amendment No. 3 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2011, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor, as shareholder representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2011).

4.5

Indenture, dated October 20, 2010, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, certain subsidiary guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust FSB, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2010).

4.6

Registration Rights Agreement dated October 20, 2010, by and among Tutor Perini Corporation, certain subsidiary guarantors named therein and the initial purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2010).

4.7

Indenture, dated June 15, 2016, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Wilmington Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2016). 

Exhibit 10.

Material Contracts

10.1*

Tutor Perini Corporation Amended and Restated (2004) Construction Business Unit2009 General Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2Annex B to Amendment No. 2 tothe Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-111338)DEF 14A filed on March 8, 2004)April 17, 2009).

10.2*

Amended and Restated Tutor Perini Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended on October 2, 2014 and included as Exhibit A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on October 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

33


Table of Contents

10.3*

Tutor Perini Corporation 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A filed on April 17, 2009).

10.4*

Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 (File No. 333-111338) filed on February 10, 2004).

10.5*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Tutor Perini Corporation 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Tutor Perini Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on March 4, 2005).

10.610.4

Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Facility, dated as of June 5, 2014, with Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent, Swing Line lender and L/C Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2014).

10.710.5

Promissory Note, dated July 1, 2011, issued by Tutor Perini Corporation to GreenStar IH Rep LLC, in its capacity as the Interest Holder Representative on behalf of certain equity holders of GreenStar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2011).

10.8*

Employment Agreement dated as of March 21, 2011, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and James A. Frost (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8−K filed on March 25, 2011).

10.9*

Employment Agreement dated as of December 22,  2014, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2014).

10.10*

2009 General Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex B to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A filed on April 17, 2009).

10.11

Commercial Lease Agreement, dated April 18, 2014 by and among Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014).

10.12

Industrial Lease Agreement, dated April 18, 2014 by and among Tutor Perini Corporation and Kristra Investments, Ltd (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014).

10.13*

Letter Agreement, dated November 9, 2015, by and between Gary Smalley and Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2015).

10.14

Waiver and Amendment No. 1 to the Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2016, with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Form 10-K on February 29, 2016).

10.6

Consent and Amendment No. 2 to the Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 8, 2016, with the guarantors and lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and L/C Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed herewith.on June 8, 2016). 

10.7*

Employment Agreement dated as of December 22, 2014, by and between Tutor Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2014).

10.8*

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November 1, 2016 by and between James A. Frost and Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on November 2, 2016).

10.9*

Letter Agreement, dated November 9, 2015, by and between Gary Smalley and Tutor Perini Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2015).

10.10

Commercial Lease Agreement, dated April 18, 2014 by and among Tutor-Perini Corporation and Ronald N. Tutor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014).

10.11

Industrial Lease Agreement, dated April 18, 2014 by and among Tutor-Perini Corporation and Krista Investments, Ltd (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014).

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Tutor Perini Corporation—  filed herewith.Corporation.

Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — filed herewith.Firm.

Exhibit 24

Power of Attorney — filed herewith.executed by members of the Company’s Board of Directors allowing Management to sign the Company’s Form 10-K on their behalf.

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002—filed herewith.2002.

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — filed herewith.2002.

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — filed herewith.2002.

32


Table of Contents

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — filed herewith.2002.

Exhibit 95

Mine Safety Disclosure — filed herewith.Disclosure.

Exhibit 101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

Exhibit 101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

Exhibit 101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

Exhibit 101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.


*Management contract or compensatory arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K

3334

 


 

Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



5

 

 



Tutor Perini Corporation



(Registrant)



 

Dated: February 29, 201623, 2017

By:

/s/Gary G. Smalley



Gary G. Smalley



Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.





 

 

 

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date



 

 

 

 

Principal Executive Officer and Director

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

/s/Ronald N. Tutor

 

 

 

 

Ronald N. Tutor

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

February 29, 201623, 2017



 

 

 

 

Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

/s/Gary G. Smalley

 

 

 

 

Gary G. Smalley

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

February 29, 201623, 2017



 

 

 

 

Principal Accounting Officer

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

/s/Ronald P. Marano II

 

 

 

 

Ronald P. Marano II

 

Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

 

February 29, 201623, 2017







 

 

 

 Other Directors

 

 

 



 

 

 

Marilyn A. Alexander

)

 

 

Peter Arkley

)

 

 

James A. Frost

)

 

 

Sidney J. Feltenstein

)

 

/s/Gary G. Smalley

Michael R. Klein

)

 

Gary G. Smalley

Robert C. Lieber

)

 

Attorney in Fact

Raymond R. Oneglia

)

 

 

Dale A. Reiss

)

 

 

Donald D. Snyder

)

 

 

Dickran M. Tevrizian, Jr.

)

 

Dated: February 29, 201623, 2017

  

  



 

3435

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



TABLE OF CONTENTS







 



Pages

Consolidated Financial Statements of the Registrant

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

F-4

Consolidated Balance Sheets

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-8

  

  

F-1F-1

 


 

Table of Contents

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Tutor Perini Corporation

Sylmar, California



We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tutor Perini Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015.2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.



We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tutor Perini Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015,2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 29, 201623, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.



5

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Los Angeles, California

February 29, 2016



Los Angeles, California

February 23, 2017





F-2F-2

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

REVENUE

$

4,920,472 

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

4,175,672 

$

4,973,076 

 

$

4,920,472 

 

$

4,492,309 

COST OF OPERATIONS

 

(4,564,219)

 

 

(3,986,867)

 

 

(3,708,768)

 

(4,515,886)

 

 

(4,564,219)

 

 

(3,986,867)

GROSS PROFIT

 

356,253 

 

 

505,442 

 

 

466,904 

 

457,190 

 

 

356,253 

 

 

505,442 

General and administrative expenses

 

(250,840)

 

 

(263,752)

 

 

(263,082)

 

(255,270)

 

 

(250,840)

 

 

(263,752)

INCOME FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

 

105,413 

 

 

241,690 

��

 

203,822 

 

201,920 

 

 

105,413 

 

 

241,690 

Other income (expense), net

 

12,453 

 

 

(9,536)

 

(18,575)

 

6,977 

 

 

13,569 

 

(8,217)

Interest expense

 

(44,027)

 

 

(44,716)

 

 

(45,632)

 

(59,782)

 

 

(45,143)

 

 

(46,035)

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

73,839 

 

 

187,438 

 

 

139,615 

 

149,115 

 

 

73,839 

 

 

187,438 

Provision for income taxes

 

(28,547)

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

(52,319)

 

(53,293)

 

 

(28,547)

 

 

(79,502)

NET INCOME

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

$

0.92 

 

$

2.22 

 

$

1.82 

$

1.95 

 

$

0.92 

 

$

2.22 

DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

$

0.91 

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

$

1.92 

 

$

0.91 

 

$

2.20 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC

 

48,981 

 

 

48,562 

 

 

47,851 

 

49,150 

 

 

48,981 

 

 

48,562 

DILUTED

 

49,666 

 

 

49,114 

 

 

48,589 

 

49,864 

 

 

49,666 

 

 

49,114 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

  

  

F-3F-3

 


 

Table of Contents

 



TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

NET INCOME

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME, NET OF TAX:

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAX:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension plan adjustments

 

2,026 

 

(8,155)

 

$

10,910 

 

(2,623)

 

2,026 

 

(8,155)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

(3,214)

 

(638)

 

(738)

 

(261)

 

(3,214)

 

(638)

Unrealized (loss) gain in fair value of investments

 

766 

 

205 

 

(555)

 

(340)

 

766 

 

205 

Unrealized gain in fair value of interest rate swap

 

(125)

 

 

349 

 

 

578 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

$

(547)

 

$

(8,239)

 

$

10,195 

Unrealized (loss) gain in fair value of interest rate swap

 

(24)

 

 

(125)

 

 

349 

Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

(3,248)

 

 

(547)

 

 

(8,239)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

$

44,745 

 

$

99,697 

 

$

97,491 

$

92,574 

 

$

44,745 

 

$

99,697 





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

  

  

F-4F-4

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

As of December 31,

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, including cash equivalents of $1,696 and $12,044

$

75,452 

 

$

135,583 

Cash, including cash equivalents of $15,302 and $1,696

$

146,103 

 

$

75,452 

Restricted cash

 

45,853 

 

44,370 

 

50,504 

 

45,853 

Accounts receivable, including retainage of $484,255 and $382,891

 

1,473,615 

 

1,479,504 

Accounts receivable, including retainage of $569,391 and $484,255

 

1,743,300 

 

1,473,615 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

905,175 

 

726,402 

 

831,826 

 

905,175 

Deferred income taxes

 

26,306 

 

17,962 

Other current assets

 

108,844 

 

 

68,735 

 

66,023 

 

 

108,844 

Total current assets

 

2,635,245 

 

 

2,472,556 

 

2,837,756 

 

 

2,608,939 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

 

 

 

 

Land

 

41,382 

 

41,307 

 

41,382 

 

41,382 

Building and improvements

 

123,600 

 

120,796 

 

124,157 

 

123,600 

Construction equipment

 

431,080 

 

426,379 

 

444,153 

 

431,080 

Other equipment

 

181,940 

 

 

159,148 

 

181,717 

 

 

181,940 

 

778,002 

 

 

747,630 

 

791,409 

 

 

778,002 

Less - Accumulated depreciation

 

254,477 

 

 

220,028 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(313,783)

 

 

(254,477)

Total property and equipment, net

 

523,525 

 

 

527,602 

 

477,626 

 

 

523,525 

GOODWILL

 

585,006 

 

 

585,006 

 

585,006 

 

 

585,006 

INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

 

96,540 

 

100,254 

 

92,997 

 

96,540 

OTHER ASSETS

 

202,125 

 

 

87,897 

 

45,235 

 

 

47,290 

TOTAL ASSETS

$

4,042,441 

 

$

3,773,315 

$

4,038,620 

 

$

3,861,300 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

$

85,890 

 

$

88,917 

Accounts payable, including retainage of $258,294 and $204,767

 

994,016 

 

937,464 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

331,112 

 

288,311 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

107,925 

 

 

134,127 

Total current liabilities

 

1,518,943 

 

 

1,448,819 

 

 

 

 

LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance cost of $56,072 and $6,697

 

673,629 

 

728,767 

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

 

131,007 

 

122,822 

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

162,018 

 

 

140,665 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

2,485,597 

 

 

2,441,073 

 

 

 

 

 

CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (Note 7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock – authorized 1,000,000 shares ($1 par value), none issued

 

 —

 

 —

Common stock – authorized 75,000,000 shares ($1 par value), issued and outstanding 49,211,353 and 49,072,710 shares

 

49,211 

 

49,073 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,075,600 

 

1,035,516 

Retained earnings

 

473,625 

 

377,803 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(45,413)

 

 

(42,165)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

1,553,023 

 

 

1,420,227 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

$

4,038,620 

 

$

3,861,300 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

$

88,917 

 

$

81,292 

Accounts payable, including retainage

 

937,464 

 

 

798,174 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

288,311 

 

 

319,296 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

159,016 

 

 

159,814 

Total current liabilities

 

1,473,708 

 

 

1,358,576 

LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities

 

734,531 

 

 

784,067 

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

 

273,310 

 

 

150,371 

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

140,665 

 

 

114,796 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

2,622,214 

 

 

2,407,810 

CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (Note 7)

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock– authorized 1,000,000 shares ($1 par value), none issued

 

 —

 

 

 —

Common stock - authorized 75,000,000 shares ($1 par value), issued and outstanding - 49,072,710 shares and 48,671,492 shares

 

49,073 

 

 

48,671 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,035,516 

 

 

1,025,941 

Retained earnings

 

377,803 

 

 

332,511 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(42,165)

 

 

(41,618)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

1,420,227 

 

 

1,365,505 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

$

4,042,441 

 

$

3,773,315 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.  

F-5F-5

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

37,919 

 

40,216 

 

 

43,383 

 

63,759 

 

37,919 

 

40,216 

Amortization of intangible assets and debt issuance costs

 

5,810 

 

15,756 

 

 

16,027 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

3,543 

 

3,715 

 

13,486 

Share-based compensation expense

 

9,477 

 

18,615 

 

 

6,623 

 

13,423 

 

9,477 

 

18,615 

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

(186)

 

(787)

 

 

(1,148)

 

(269)

 

(186)

 

(787)

Change in debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs

 

10,968 

 

2,095 

 

2,270 

Deferred income taxes

 

22,214 

 

21,460 

 

 

9,009 

 

(10,169)

 

22,214 

 

21,460 

Loss on sale of investments

 

 —

 

1,786 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,786 

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment

 

(2,909)

 

801 

 

 

49 

 

453 

 

(2,909)

 

801 

Other long-term liabilities

 

28,912 

 

3,074 

 

 

23,107 

 

28,210 

 

28,912 

 

3,074 

Other non-cash items

 

(3,680)

 

3,273 

 

 

(3,719)

 

(1,874)

 

(3,680)

 

3,273 

Changes in other components of working capital

 

(128,777)

 

 

(268,808)

 

 

(129,899)

 

(90,530)

 

 

(128,777)

 

 

(268,808)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

14,072 

 

 

(56,678)

 

 

50,728 

 

113,336 

 

 

14,072 

 

 

(56,678)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment excluding financed purchases

 

(35,912)

 

(75,013)

 

 

(42,360)

 

(15,743)

 

(35,912)

 

(75,013)

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

4,980 

 

5,335 

 

 

2,663 

 

1,899 

 

4,980 

 

5,335 

Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities

 

 —

 

44,497 

 

 

 —

Proceeds from sale of investments

 

 —

 

 —

 

44,497 

Change in restricted cash

 

(1,483)

 

 

(1,776)

 

 

(3,877)

 

(4,651)

 

 

(1,483)

 

 

(1,776)

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

(32,415)

 

 

(26,957)

 

 

(43,574)

 

(18,495)

 

 

(32,415)

 

 

(26,957)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of convertible notes

 

200,000 

 

 —

 

 —

Proceeds from debt

 

1,013,205 

 

1,156,739 

 

 

653,280 

 

1,353,895 

 

1,013,205 

 

1,156,739 

Repayment of debt

 

(1,054,371)

 

(1,026,349)

 

 

(676,795)

 

(1,562,684)

 

(1,054,371)

 

(1,026,349)

Business acquisition-related payments

 

 —

 

(26,430)

 

 

(31,038)

Payments related to business acquisitions

 

 —

 

 —

 

(26,430)

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

186 

 

787 

 

 

1,148 

 

269 

 

186 

 

787 

Issuance of common stock and effect of cashless exercise

 

(808)

 

(1,771)

 

 

(1,882)

 

(584)

 

(808)

 

(1,771)

Debt issuance costs

 

 —

 

 

(3,681)

 

 

 —

 

(15,086)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,681)

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

(41,788)

 

 

99,295 

 

 

(55,287)

 

(24,190)

 

 

(41,788)

 

 

99,295 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(60,131)

 

15,660 

 

 

(48,133)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

70,651 

 

(60,131)

 

15,660 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

135,583 

 

 

119,923 

 

 

168,056 

 

75,452 

 

 

135,583 

 

 

119,923 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$

75,452 

 

$

135,583 

 

$

119,923 

$

146,103 

 

$

75,452 

 

$

135,583 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

  

  

F-6F-6

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Common

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

Common

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

(Loss) Income

 

Total

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Loss

 

Total

Balance - December 31, 2012

$

47,556 

 

$

1,002,603 

 

$

137,279 

 

$

(43,574)

 

$

1,143,864 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

87,296 

 

 

 —

 

 

87,296 

Other comprehensive income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,195 

 

 

10,195 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97,491 

Tax effect of share-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

(7)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(7)

Share-based compensation expense

 

 —

 

 

6,623 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

6,623 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

865 

 

 

(1,301)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(436)

Balance - December 31, 2013

$

48,421 

 

$

1,007,918 

 

$

224,575 

 

$

(33,379)

 

$

1,247,535 

$

48,421 

 

$

1,007,918 

 

$

224,575 

 

$

(33,379)

 

$

1,247,535 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

107,936 

 

 

 —

 

 

107,936 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

107,936 

 

 

 —

 

 

107,936 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(8,239)

 

 

(8,239)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(8,239)

 

 

(8,239)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,697 

Tax effect of share-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

786 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

786 

 

 —

 

 

786 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

786 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 —

 

 

18,616 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

18,616 

 

 —

 

 

18,616 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

18,616 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

250 

 

 

(1,379)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,129)

 

250 

 

 

(1,379)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,129)

Balance - December 31, 2014

$

48,671 

 

$

1,025,941 

 

$

332,511 

 

$

(41,618)

 

$

1,365,505 

$

48,671 

 

$

1,025,941 

 

$

332,511 

 

$

(41,618)

 

$

1,365,505 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

45,292 

 

 

 —

 

 

45,292 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

45,292 

 

 

 —

 

 

45,292 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(547)

 

 

(547)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(547)

 

 

(547)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,745 

Tax effect of share-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

(186)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(186)

 

 —

 

 

(186)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(186)

Share-based compensation expense

 

 —

 

 

9,477 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,477 

 

 —

 

 

9,477 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,477 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

402 

 

 

284 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

686 

 

402 

 

 

284 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

686 

Balance - December 31, 2015

$

49,073 

 

$

1,035,516 

 

$

377,803 

 

$

(42,165)

 

$

1,420,227 

$

49,073 

 

$

1,035,516 

 

$

377,803 

 

$

(42,165)

 

$

1,420,227 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

95,822 

 

 

 —

 

 

95,822 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,248)

 

 

(3,248)

Tax effect of share-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

(457)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(457)

Share-based compensation expense

 

 —

 

 

13,423 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13,423 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

138 

 

 

676 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

814 

Convertible note proceeds allocated to conversion option, net

 

 —

 

 

26,442 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

26,442 

Balance - December 31, 2016

$

49,211 

 

$

1,075,600 

 

$

473,625 

 

$

(45,413)

 

$

1,553,023 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

  

  



 

F-7F-7

 


 

Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.      Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



(a) Basis of Presentation



The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) as codified in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).



(b) Principles of Consolidation



The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tutor Perini Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). The Company’s interestsCompany frequently forms joint ventures or partnerships with unrelated third parties for the execution of single contracts or projects. The Company assesses its joint ventures or partnerships at inception to determine if they meet the qualifications of a variable interest entity ("VIE") in accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation. If a joint venture or partnership is a VIE and the Company is the primary beneficiary, the joint venture or partnership is fully consolidated. For construction joint ventures are accountedthat do not need to be consolidated, the Company accounts for its interest in the joint ventures using the proportionate consolidation method, whereby the Company’s proportionate share of eachthe joint venture’sventures’ assets, liabilities, revenue and cost of operations are included in the appropriate classifications in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.



(c) Use of Estimates



The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. These estimates are based on information available through the date of the issuance of the financial statements. Therefore,statements; therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.



(d) Construction Contracts



The Company and its affiliated entities recognize construction contract revenue using the percentage-of-completion method, based primarily on contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost. Cost of revenue includes an allocation of depreciation and amortization. Pre-contract costs are expensed as incurred. Changes to total estimated contract cost or losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are determined.



The Company generally provides limited warranties for work performed under its construction contracts with periods typically extending for a limited duration following substantial completion of the Company’s work on a project. Historically, warranty claims have not resulted in material costs incurred.



The Company classifies construction-related receivables and payables that may be settled in periods exceeding one year from the balance sheet date as current, consistent with the length of time of its project operating cycle. For example:



·

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings represent the excess of contract costs and profits (or contract revenue) over the amount of contract billings to date and are classified as a current asset.



·

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings represent the excess of contract billings to date over the amount of contract costs and profits (or contract revenue) recognized to date and are classified as a current liability.



Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings result when either: 1) costs are incurred related to certain claims and unapproved change orders, or 2) the appropriate contract revenue amount has been recognized in accordance with the percentage-of-completion accounting method, but a portion of the revenue recorded cannot be billed currently due to the billing terms defined in the contract.contract, or 2) costs are incurred related to certain claims and unapproved change orders. Claims occur when there is a dispute regarding both a change in the scope of work and the price associated with that change. Unapproved change orders occur when there is a dispute regarding only the price associated with a change in the scope of work.work results in additional work being performed before the parties have agreed on the corresponding change in the contract price. For both claims and unapproved change orders, the Company recognizes revenue, but not profit, when it is determined that recovery of incurred cost is probable and the amounts can be reliably estimated. For claims, these requirements are satisfied under ASC 605-35-25 when the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim, additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and not the result of deficiencies in the Company’s performance, claim-related costs are identifiable and considered reasonable in view of the work performed, and evidence supporting the claim or change order is objective and verifiable.



F-8F-8

 


 

Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Reported costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings consists of the followingfollowing:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Claims

$

407,164 

 

$

311,949 

$

477,425 

 

$

407,164 

Unapproved change orders

 

270,019 

 

 

161,375 

 

207,475 

 

 

270,019 

Other unbilled costs and profits

 

227,992 

 

 

253,078 

 

146,926 

 

 

227,992 

Total costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

$

905,175 

 

$

726,402 

$

831,826 

 

$

905,175 



The prerequisite for billing claims and unapproved change orders is the final resolution and agreement between the parties. The prerequisite for billing other unbilled costs and profits is provided in the defined billing terms of each of the applicable contracts. The amount of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings as of December 31, 20152016 estimated by management to be collected beyond one year is approximately $353.2$414.7 million.



(e) Changes in Estimates



The Company’s estimates of contract revenue and cost are highly detailed and many factors change during a contract performance period that result in a change to contract profitability. These factors include, but are not limited to, differing site conditions; availability of skilled contract labor; performance of major material suppliers and subcontractors; on-going subcontractor negotiations and buyout provisions; unusual weather conditions; changes in the timing of scheduled work; change orders; accuracy of the original bid estimate; changes in estimated labor productivity and costs based on experience to date; achievement of incentive-based income targets; and the expected, or actual, resolution terms for claims. The factors that cause changes in estimates vary depending on the maturation of the project within its lifecycle. For example, in the ramp-up phase, these factors typically consist of revisions in anticipated project costs and during the peak and close-out phases, these factors include the impact of change orders and claims as well as additional revisions in remaining anticipated project costs. Generally, if the contract is at an early stage of completion, the current period impact is smaller than if the same change in estimate is made to the contract at a later stage of completion. Management focuses on evaluating the performance of contracts individually and uses the cumulative catch-up method to account for revisions in estimates. Materialevaluates changes in estimates are disclosedon a contract by contract basis and discloses significant changes, if material, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The cumulative catch-up method is used to account for revisions in estimates.



(f) Depreciation of Property and Equipment and Amortization of Long-Lived Intangible Assets



Property and equipment and long-lived intangible assets are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives ranging from three to forty years.



(g) Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets



Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever circumstances indicate that the future cash flows generated by the assets might be less than the assets’ net carrying value. In such circumstances, an impairment loss will be recognized by the amount the assets’ net carrying value exceeds their fair value.



(h) Recoverability of Goodwill



Goodwill is not amortized to earnings, but instead is reviewedThe Company tests goodwill for impairment annually for each reporting unit in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change which suggest that goodwill should be reevaluated. Such events or circumstances include significant changes in legal factors and business climate, recent losses at a reporting unit, level annually, or more often if there are indicators between the annual review dates that signal that impairment is probable.and industry trends, among other factors. The Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors segments each represent a reporting unit. We perform our annual quantitative impairment assessment during the fourth quarter of each year using a weighted average of an income and a market approach. The income approach is based on estimated present value of future cash flows for each reporting unit, which then are discounted to their present value.unit. The market approach is based on assumptions about how market data relates to the Company. The weighting of these two approaches is based on their individual correlation to the economics of each reporting unit. The quantitative assessment performed in 20152016 resulted in an estimated fair value for each of our reporting units that exceeded their respective net book values; therefore, no impairment charge was necessary for 2015.2016.



(i) Recoverability of Non-Amortizable Trade Names



Certain trade names have an estimated indefinite life and are not amortized to earnings, but instead are reviewed for impairment annually, or more often if there are indicators betweenevents occur or circumstances change which suggest that the annual review dates that signal that impairment is probable.non-amortizable trade names should be reevaluated. We perform our annual quantitative impairment assessment during the fourth quarter of each year using an income

F-9


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

approach (relief from royalty method). The quantitative assessment performed in 20152016 resulted in an estimated fair value for the non-amortizable trade names that exceeded their respective net book values; therefore, no impairment charge was necessary for 2015.2016.



F-9


Table of Contents

(j) Income Taxes



Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the effects of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the income tax basis of assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to be in effect when such differences reverse. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not threshold to be recognized. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of the income tax provision.



(k) Earnings Per Share



Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities include restricted stock units and stock options. Diluted EPS reflects the assumed exercise or conversion of all dilutive securities using the treasury stock method.

The calculations of the basic and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013 under the treasury stock method2014 are presented below:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands, except per share data)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Net income

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

$

87,296 

$

95,822 

 

$

45,292 

 

$

107,936 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic

 

48,981 

 

48,562 

 

47,851 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding — basic

 

49,150 

 

48,981 

 

48,562 

Effect of diluted stock options and unvested restricted stock

 

685 

 

 

552 

 

 

738 

 

714 

 

 

685 

 

 

552 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted

 

49,666 

 

 

49,114 

 

 

48,589 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding — diluted

 

49,864 

 

 

49,666 

 

 

49,114 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

0.92 

 

$

2.22 

 

$

1.82 

$

1.95 

 

$

0.92 

 

$

2.22 

Diluted

$

0.91 

 

$

2.20 

 

$

1.80 

$

1.92 

 

$

0.91 

 

$

2.20 

Anti-dilutive securities not included above

 

1,372 

 

 

 

 

860 

 

1,132 

 

 

1,372 

 

 

With regard to diluted EPS and the impact of the Convertible Notes (as discussed in Note 5) on the diluted EPS calculation, because the Company has the intent and ability to settle the principal amount of the Convertible Notes in cash, per ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, the settlement of the principal amount has no impact on diluted EPS. ASC 260 also requires any potential conversion premium associated with the Convertible Notes’ conversion option to be considered in the calculation of diluted EPS when the Company's average stock price, as defined in the indenture governing the Convertible Notes, is higher than 130% of the Convertible Notes’ conversion rate of 33.0579 (or $39.32); however, this was not the case during the year ended December 31, 2016.



(l) Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash



Cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when acquired. Cash and cash equivalents, as reported in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, consist of amounts held by the Company that are available for general purposes and the Company’s proportionate share of amounts held by construction joint ventures that are available only for joint venture-relatedjoint-venture-related uses, including future distributions to joint venturejoint-venture partners. Restricted cash is primarily held to secure insurance-related contingent obligations, such as insurance claim deductibles, in lieu of letters of credit.



Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash consisted of the following:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Cash and cash equivalents

$

18,409 

 

$

40,846 

$

49,539 

 

$

18,409 

Company's share of joint venture cash and cash equivalents

 

57,043 

 

 

94,737 

Company's share of joint-venture cash and cash equivalents

 

96,564 

 

 

57,043 

Total cash and cash equivalents

$

75,452 

 

$

135,583 

$

146,103 

 

$

75,452 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted cash

$

45,853 

 

$

44,370 

$

50,504 

 

$

45,853 



F-10


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(m) Share-Based Compensation



The Company’s long-term incentive plan allows the Company to grant share-based compensation awards in a variety of forms, including restricted and unrestricted stock units and stock options. Restricted stock units and stock options generally vest subject to service and/or performance requirements, with related compensation expense equal to the fair value of the award on the date of grant and recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Unrestricted stock units are issued to the directors as part of their annual service fee, vest immediately and are expensed over a 12-month service period.



(n) Insurance Liabilities



The Company typically utilizes third party insurance coverage subject to varying deductible levels with aggregate caps on losses retained. The Company assumes the risk for the amount of the deductible portion of the losses and liabilities primarily associated with workers’ compensation and general liability coverage. In addition, on certain projects, the Company assumes the risk for the amount

F-10


Table of Contents

of the deductible portion of losses that arise from any subcontractor defaults. Losses are accrued based upon the Company’s estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using historical experience and certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry. The estimate of insurance liability within the deductible limits includes an estimate of incurred but not reported claims based on data compiled from historical experience.



(o) Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)



ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components in the consolidated financial statements. The Company reports the change in pension benefit plans assets/liabilities, cumulative foreign currency translation, change in fair value of investments and change in fair value of interest rate swap as components of accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCI”).



The tax effects of the components of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

(in thousands)

Before-Tax Amount

 

Tax (Expense) Benefit

 

Net-of-Tax Amount

 

Before-Tax Amount

 

Tax (Expense) Benefit

 

Net-of-Tax Amount

 

Before-Tax Amount

 

Tax (Expense) Benefit

 

Net-of-Tax Amount

Before-Tax Amount

 

Tax Benefit

 

Net-of-Tax Amount

 

Before-Tax Amount

 

Tax (Expense) Benefit

 

Net-of-Tax Amount

 

Before-Tax Amount

 

Tax (Expense) Benefit

 

Net-of-Tax Amount

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension plan adjustments

$

31 

 

$

1,995 

 

$

2,026 

 

$

(13,887)

 

$

5,732 

 

$

(8,155)

 

$

18,675 

 

$

(7,765)

 

$

10,910 

$

(4,452)

 

$

1,829 

 

$

(2,623)

 

$

31 

 

$

1,995 

 

$

2,026 

 

$

(13,887)

 

$

5,732 

 

$

(8,155)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

(5,897)

 

2,683 

 

(3,214)

 

 

(1,086)

 

448 

 

(638)

 

 

(1,212)

 

474 

 

(738)

 

(439)

 

178 

 

(261)

 

 

(5,897)

 

 

2,683 

 

(3,214)

 

 

(1,086)

 

 

448 

 

(638)

Unrealized gain (loss) in fair value of investments

 

1,123 

 

(357)

 

766 

 

 

346 

 

(141)

 

205 

 

 

(744)

 

189 

 

(555)

 

(576)

 

236 

 

(340)

 

 

1,123 

 

 

(357)

 

766 

 

 

346 

 

 

(141)

 

205 

Unrealized gain (loss) in fair value of interest rate swap

 

(37)

 

 

(88)

 

 

(125)

 

 

594 

 

 

(245)

 

 

349 

 

 

948 

 

 

(370)

 

 

578 

 

(45)

 

 

21 

 

 

(24)

 

 

(37)

 

 

(88)

 

 

(125)

 

 

594 

 

 

(245)

 

 

349 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

$

(4,780)

 

$

4,233 

 

$

(547)

 

$

(14,033)

 

$

5,794 

 

$

(8,239)

 

$

17,667 

 

$

(7,472)

 

$

10,195 

$

(5,512)

 

$

2,264 

 

$

(3,248)

 

$

(4,780)

 

$

4,233 

 

$

(547)

 

$

(14,033)

 

$

5,794 

 

$

(8,239)



The changes in AOCI balances by component (after-tax) for each of the three years ended December 31, 20152016 are as follows(1):follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

Unrealized Gain (Loss) in Fair Value of Investments

 

Unrealized Gain (Loss) in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss), Net

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

Unrealized Gain (Loss) in Fair Value of Investments

 

Unrealized Gain (Loss) in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Balance as of December 31, 2012

$

(43,023)

 

$

(13)

 

$

240 

 

$

(778)

 

$

(43,574)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

10,910 

 

 

(738)

 

 

(555)

 

 

578 

 

 

10,195 

Balance as of December 31, 2013

$

(32,113)

 

$

(751)

 

$

(315)

 

$

(200)

 

$

(33,379)

$

(32,113)

 

$

(751)

 

$

(315)

 

$

(200)

 

$

(33,379)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(8,155)

 

 

(638)

 

 

205 

 

 

349 

 

 

(8,239)

 

(8,155)

 

 

(638)

 

 

205 

 

 

349 

 

 

(8,239)

Balance as of December 31, 2014

$

(40,268)

 

$

(1,389)

 

$

(110)

 

$

149 

 

$

(41,618)

$

(40,268)

 

$

(1,389)

 

$

(110)

 

$

149 

 

$

(41,618)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

2,026 

 

 

(3,214)

 

 

766 

 

 

(125)

 

 

(547)

 

2,026 

 

 

(3,214)

 

 

766 

 

 

(125)

 

 

(547)

Balance as of December 31, 2015

$

(38,242)

 

$

(4,603)

 

$

656 

 

$

24 

 

$

(42,165)

$

(38,242)

 

$

(4,603)

 

$

656 

 

$

24 

 

$

(42,165)

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

 

(3,722)

 

 

(261)

 

 

(340)

 

 

(24)

 

 

(4,347)

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

1,099 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,099 

Balance as of December 31, 2016

$

(40,865)

 

$

(4,864)

 

$

316 

 

$

 —

 

$

(45,413)







(1) There were no reclassifications from AOCI during the three years ended December 31, 2015.

(p) New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU addresses when and how an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods and/or services to customers. This ASU is effective for fiscal year and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this ASU will have on its financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810) , which amends the consolidation standard and updates the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The amendment modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities and affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, among other provisions. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this ASU will have on its financial statements.

F-11F-11

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The significant items reclassified out of AOCI and the corresponding location and impact on the Consolidated Statement of Earnings are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Location in Consolidated

 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

Statements of Earnings

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Component of AOCI:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension plan adjustments

Various accounts

 

$

1,745 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Income tax benefit

Provision for income taxes

 

 

(646)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Net of tax

 

 

$

1,099 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

(p) New Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015,May 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which amended the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. The new accounting guidance establishes principles for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the expected consideration to be received in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance will be effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018. The amendments may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application (modified retrospective method). The Company is currently reviewing contracts within types of projects in order to determine the impact, if any, the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements. A number of industry-specific implementation issues are still unresolved and the final resolution of certain of these issues could impact the Company’s current accounting policies and/or revenue recognition patterns. The Company currently expects to adopt this new standard using the modified retrospective method.

In January 2017, The FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This ASU simplifies the calculation of goodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2 of the impairment test prescribed by ASC 350. Step 2 requires companies to calculate the implied fair value of their goodwill by estimating the fair value of their assets, other than goodwill, and liabilities, including unrecognized assets and liabilities, following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. The calculated net fair value of the assets would then be compared to the fair value of the reporting unit to determine the implied fair value of goodwill, and to the extent that the carrying value of goodwill was less than the implied fair value, a loss would be recognized. Under ASU 2017-04, however, goodwill is impaired when the calculated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, and the impairment charge will equal that difference; i.e., impairment will be calculated at the reporting unit level and there will be no need to estimate the fair value of individual assets and liabilities. This guidance will be effective for the Company for any goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, however, early adoption is permitted for tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In the first quarter of 2016, the Company adopted ASU 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). This ASUrequires thatcompanies to present, in the balance sheet, debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. In August 2015,addition, the FASB also issued ASU 2015-15, Interest—Imputationamortization of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurementdebt discounts is required to be presented as a component of Debt Issuance Costs Associated With Line-of-Credit Arrangements — Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015, EITF Meeting. This update allows an entity to defer and presentinterest expense. The Company applied the guidance retrospectively; accordingly, the Company reclassified unamortized debt issuance costs relatedof $5.8 million from Other Assets to line-of-credit arrangements as an assetLong-Term Debt,  less current maturities in its December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet and subsequently amortize thereclassified amortization of deferred debt issuance costs ratably overof $1.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively, from Other income (expense), net to Interest Expense in its Consolidated Statements of Operations for the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. These ASUs are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of these ASUs is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (Subtopic 740-10). This ASU require entities to present all deferred tax assets and all deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company had $26.3 million of current deferred tax assets and $24.9 million of current deferred tax liabilities as ofended December 31, 2015 which will be presented as noncurrent upon adoption of this ASU.and 2014.



In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic-842), which amends the existing guidance in ASC 840 Leases. This amendment requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases currently classified as operating leases. Other significant provisions of the amendment include (i) defining the “lease term” to include the non-cancellable period together with periods for which there is a significant economic incentive for the lessee to extend or not terminate the lease; (ii) defining the initial lease liability to be recorded on the balance sheet to contemplate only those variable lease payments that depend on an index or that are in substance “fixed”; and (iii) a dual approach for determining whether lease expense is recognized on a straight-line or accelerated basis, depending on whether the lessee is expected to consume more than an insignificant portion of the leased asset’s economic benefits. This ASU isguidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.the Company as of January 1, 2019 and will be applied using the modified retrospective transition method for existing leases. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

F-12


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company elected to early adopt ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (Subtopic 740-10), as allowed for by the guidance.  This ASU requires entities to present all deferred tax assets and all deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The Company applied the guidance retrospectively as discussed in Note 6.

  

2.     Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows



Below are the changes in other components of working capital, as shown in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and the supplemental disclosure of cash paid for interest and income taxes, as well as non-cash transactions:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Decrease (Increase) in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

$

4,734 

 

$

(186,384)

 

$

(62,991)

$

(269,900)

 

$

4,734 

 

$

(186,384)

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

(178,774)

 

(153,153)

 

(107,983)

 

73,349 

 

(178,774)

 

(153,153)

Other current assets

 

(38,616)

 

(17,450)

 

25,250 

 

39,480 

 

(38,616)

 

(17,450)

Increase (Decrease) in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

139,290 

 

33,667 

 

59,169 

 

56,552 

 

139,290 

 

33,667 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

(30,985)

 

51,711 

 

(36,835)

 

42,926 

 

(30,985)

 

51,711 

Accrued expenses

 

(24,426)

 

 

2,801 

 

 

(6,509)

 

(32,937)

 

 

(24,426)

 

 

2,801 

Changes in other components of working capital

$

(128,777)

 

$

(268,808)

 

$

(129,899)

$

(90,530)

 

$

(128,777)

 

$

(268,808)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the year for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

$

45,055 

 

$

45,236 

 

$

41,207 

$

47,403 

 

$

45,055 

 

$

45,236 

Income taxes

$

35,299 

 

$

75,494 

 

$

28,898 

$

26,908 

 

$

35,299 

 

$

75,494 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash transactions during the year for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment acquired through financing arrangements not included
in financing activities

$

 —

 

$

816 

 

$

16,689 

Property and equipment acquired through financing arrangements not included in cash flows from financing activities

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

816 

















F-12F-13

 


 

Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

3.     Fair Value Measurements



The fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation techniques into the following three levels:



Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

Level 2 — inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly

Level 3 — unobservable inputs



The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels required under ASC 820, the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014:

2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

December 31, 2014

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

(in thousands)

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents (a)

 

$

75,452 

 

$

75,452 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

135,583 

 

$

135,583 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

146,103 

 

$

146,103 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

75,452 

 

$

75,452 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Restricted cash (a)

 

45,853 

 

45,853 

 

 —

 

 —

 

44,370 

 

44,370 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

50,504 

 

 

50,504 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

45,853 

 

 

45,853 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Investments in lieu of customer retainage (b)

 

 

41,566 

 

 

35,350 

 

 

6,216 

 

 

 —

 

 

33,224 

 

 

25,761 

 

 

7,463 

 

 

 —

 

 

51,266 

 

 

46,855 

 

 

4,411 

 

 

 —

 

 

41,566 

 

 

35,350 

 

 

6,216 

 

 

 —

Total

 

$

162,871 

 

$

156,655 

 

$

6,216 

 

$

 —

 

$

213,177 

 

$

205,714 

 

$

7,463 

 

$

 —

 

$

247,873 

 

$

243,462 

 

$

4,411 

 

$

 —

 

$

162,871 

 

$

156,655 

 

$

6,216 

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap contract (c)

 

$

45 

 

$

 —

 

$

45 

 

$

 —

 

$

381 

 

$

 —

 

$

381 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

45 

 

$

 —

 

$

45 

 

$

 —

Contingent consideration (d)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

24,814 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

24,814 

Total

 

$

45 

 

$

 —

 

$

45 

 

$

 —

 

$

25,195 

 

$

 —

 

$

381 

 

$

24,814 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

45 

 

$

 —

 

$

45 

 

$

 —


(a)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash consistconsists primarily of money market funds with original maturity dates of three months or less for which fair value is determined throughmeasured using quoted market prices.

(b)

Investments in lieu of customer retainage are classified as accounts receivable and are comprised of money market funds, U.S. Treasury Notes and other municipal bonds, the majority of which are rated Aa3 or better. The fair value of money market funds is measured using quoted market prices; therefore they are classified as Level 1 assets. The fair values of the U.S. Treasury Notes and municipal bonds are obtained from readily-availablemeasured using readily available pricing sources for comparable instruments, and as such, the Company hasinstruments; therefore, they are classified these assets as Level 2.2 assets.

(c)

The Company valuesvalued the interest rate swap liability utilizing a discounted cash flow model that takestook into consideration forward interest rates observable in the market and the counterparty’s credit risk.

(d)

Represents earn-out payments for businesses acquired in 2011. The earn-out payments were estimated based on the projected operating results of the acquired businesses. The fair value of the earn-out payments was estimated by calculating their present value using discount rates ranging from 14% to 18%.



The following is a summary of changes in Level 3 liabilities during 2015 and 2014:2015:







 

 



 

 



Contingent

(in thousands)

Consideration

Balance as of December 31, 2013

$

46,022 

Fair value adjustments included in other income (expense), net

5,592 

Amount no longer subject to contingency

(26,800)

Balance as of December 31, 2014

$

24,814 

Fair value adjustments included in other income (expense), net

 

(3,739)

Amount no longer subject to contingency

 

(21,075)

Balance as of December 31, 2015

$

 —





The Company did not have material transfers between Levels 1 and 2 for either financial assets or liabilities during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.  

Auction Rate

(in thousands)

Securities

Balance as of December 31, 2013

$

46,283 

Purchases

 —

Settlements

(44,497)

Realized loss included in other income (expense), net

(1,786)

Balance as of December 31, 2014

$

 —



On April 30, 2014, the Company sold all of its auction rate securities for approximately $44.5 million and recognized a loss of $1.8million.

F-13


Table of Contents

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. The carrying values of receivables, payables, other amounts arising out of normal contract activities, including retainage, which may be settled beyond one year, are estimated to approximate fair value. Of the Company’s long-term debt, the fair values of the Senior2010 Notes as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $302.6 million and 2014 were $305.6 million, respectively, and $310.3the fair value of the Convertible Notes was  $228.4 million respectively, compared toas of December 31, 2016; the carryingfair values were determined using Level 1 inputs, specifically current observable market prices. The reported value of $299.0 millionthe Company’s remaining long-term debt at December 31, 2016 and $298.8 million, respectively. 2015 approximates fair value.  

The fair value of the Seniorliability component of the Convertible Notes as of the issuance date of June 15, 2016 was calculated$153.2 million, which was determined using Level 1 inputsa binomial lattice approach based on Level 2 inputs, specifically quoted prices in the active markets for the Senior Notes as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. For other fixed ratesimilar debt fair value is determined using Level 3 inputs based on discounted cash flowsinstruments that do not have a conversion feature. See Note 5 for the debt at the Company’s current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of debt. The estimated fair values of other fixed rate debt as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $121.7 million and $164.3 million, respectively, compared to the carrying amounts of $124.7 million and $162.3 million, respectively. The fair value of variable rate debt, which includes the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan, approximated its carrying value of $399.7 million and $404.3 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

4.     Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill allocatedadditional information related to the Company’s reporting units for the periods presented:Convertible Notes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Civil

 

Building

 

Contractors

 

Total

Balance as of December 31, 2013(a)

$

415,358 

 

$

13,455 

 

$

148,943 

 

$

577,756 

2014 activity (b)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,250 

 

 

7,250 

Balance as of December 31, 2014(a)

$

415,358 

 

$

13,455 

 

$

156,193 

 

$

585,006 

2015 activity

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Balance as of December 31, 2015(a)

$

415,358 

 

$

13,455 

 

$

156,193 

 

$

585,006 

(a)

Balances presented include historical accumulated impairment of $76.7 million for the Civil segment and $411.3 million for the Building segment.

(b)

In the second quarter of 2014, the Company made an acquisition-related adjustment for a small fire protection systems contractor which was acquired in September 2013.

The following table presents the carrying value and accumulated amortization, as appropriate, of intangible assets other than goodwill for the periods presented:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

Gross

 

 

 

Net

 

Gross

 

 

 

Net

 

Carrying

 

Accumulated

 

Carrying

 

Carrying

 

Accumulated

 

Carrying

(in thousands)

Value

 

Amortization

 

Value

 

Value

 

Amortization

 

Value

Trade names (non-amortizable)

$

50,410 

 

$

N/A

 

$

50,410 

 

$

50,410 

 

$

N/A

 

$

50,410 

Trade names (amortizable) (a)

 

51,118 

 

 

(11,316)

 

 

39,802 

 

 

51,118 

 

 

(8,829)

 

 

42,289 

Customer relationships (a)

 

23,155 

 

 

(16,827)

 

 

6,328 

 

 

23,155 

 

 

(15,600)

 

 

7,555 

Total

$

124,683 

 

$

(28,143)

 

$

96,540 

 

$

124,683 

 

$

(24,429)

 

$

100,254 

(a)

The weighted-average amortization period for amortizable trade names and customer relationships is 20 years and 11 years, respectively.

  

F-14F-14

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

4.     Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

As of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company had $585.0 million of goodwill allocated to its reporting units as follows: Civil, $415.3 million; Building, $13.5 million; and Specialty Contractors, $156.2 million. The balances presented include historical accumulated impairment of $76.7 million for the Civil segment and $411.3 million for the Building segment.

In addition, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had the following: (1) non-amortizable trade names with a carrying value of $50.4 million; (2) amortizable trade names with a gross carrying value of $51.1 million and accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 of $13.8 million and $11.3 million, respectively; and (3) amortizable customer relationships with a gross carrying value of $23.2 million and accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 of $17.9 million and $16.8 million, respectively.

Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2016,  2015 and 2014 and 2013 totaled  $3.5 million, $3.7 million $13.5 million and $13.1$13.5 million, respectively. The amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 includes amortization of construction contract backlog, which was fully amortized as of December 31, 2014.in early 2015. Future amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets is as follows:will be approximately $3.5 million per year for the years 2017 through 2021.



The weighted-average amortization period for amortizable trade names and customer relationships is 20 years and 12 years, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in millions)

2016

 

$

3.5 

2017

 

 

3.5 

2018

 

 

3.5 

2019

 

 

3.5 

2020

 

 

3.5 

Thereafter

 

 

28.6 

Total

 

$

46.1 

  

5.     Financial Commitments



Long-Term Debt



Long-term debt consists of the following:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Senior Notes ($300,000 face, less unamortized discount of $933 and $1,223)

$

299,067 

 

$

298,777 

Revolving Credit Facility

 

158,000 

 

 

130,000 

Term Loan

 

223,750 

 

 

242,500 

$

54,650 

 

$

222,120 

Equipment financing, mortgages and acquisition-related notes

 

133,288 

 

 

183,202 

2014 Revolver

 

147,990 

 

 

155,815 

2010 Notes

 

298,120 

 

 

297,118 

Convertible Notes

 

152,668 

 

 

 —

Equipment financing and mortgages

 

101,558 

 

 

133,288 

Other indebtedness

 

9,343 

 

 

10,880 

 

4,533 

 

 

9,343 

Total debt

 

823,448 

 

 —

865,359 

 

759,519 

 

 

817,684 

Less – current maturities

 

(88,917)

 

 

(81,292)

 

(85,890)

 

 

(88,917)

Long-term debt, net

$

734,531 

 

$

784,067 

$

673,629 

 

$

728,767 



Senior Notes

In October 2010,The following table reconciles the Company issued $300 millionoutstanding debt balance to the reported debt balances as of 7.625% senior unsecured notes (the “Senior Notes”) due November 1, 2018, in a private offering exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The Company received net proceeds of $293.2 million from the issuance, after discounts and issuance costs. The Senior Notes pay interest semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The Company may redeem these notes at a redemption price equal to 101.9 percent of their principal amount prior to OctoberDecember 31, 2016 and subsequently without a redemption premium. However, if a change of control triggering event occurs, as defined by the terms of the indenture, the Company is required to offer to redeem the notes at a redemption price equal to 101 percent of their principal amount. At the date of any redemption, any accrued and unpaid interest is also due. The Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries that also guarantee obligations under the Company’s2015:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31, 2016

 

As of December 31, 2015

(in thousands)

Outstanding Long-Term Debt

 

Unamortized Discount and Issuance Cost

 

Long-Term

Debt,

as reported

 

Outstanding Long-Term Debt

 

Unamortized Discount and Issuance Cost

 

Long-Term Debt,
as reported

Term Loan

$

57,000 

 

$

(2,350)

 

$

54,650 

 

$

223,750 

 

$

(1,630)

 

$

222,120 

2014 Revolver

 

152,500 

 

 

(4,510)

 

 

147,990 

 

 

158,000 

 

 

(2,185)

 

 

155,815 

2010 Notes

 

300,000 

 

 

(1,880)

 

 

298,120 

 

 

300,000 

 

 

(2,882)

 

 

297,118 

Convertible Notes

 

200,000 

 

 

(47,332)

 

 

152,668 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

2014 Credit Agreement as defined below. In addition, the indenture for the Senior Notes provides for customary events of default such as restrictions on the payment of dividends and share repurchases.Facility



Credit Agreement – Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan

InOn June 5 2014, the Company entered into a Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Original Facility,” with subsequent amendments discussed herein, the “2014 Credit Facility”), restructuring its former $300 million Revolving with Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. The 2014 Credit Facility and $200 million Term Loan and providingprovides for a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “Original Revolver"“2014 Revolver”) and, a $250 million term loan (the “Original Term Loan”), both maturing on June 5, 2019. Principal on the Original Term Loan was originally payable on a quarterly basis beginning on September 30, 2014, with approximate aggregate principal payments for each year ending December 31, as follows: $7 million in 2014, $19 million in 2015, $26 million in 2016, $34 million in 2017, $41 million in 2018(the “Term Loan”) and $123 million in 2019. The Company may repay all borrowings under the Original Facility at any time before maturity without penalty.

Interest on the Original Revolver depended on how the Company utilized the facility to meet its liquidity needs. As a result, the interest rate could equal either Bank of America’s prime lending rate, plus an applicable margin, or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus an applicable margin, ranging from either 1.25% to 2.00% or 2.25% to 3.00%, based on a pricing tier utilizing the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. Similarly, the interest rate on the Original Term Loan was equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% to 2.00%. The Company also has an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of

F-15


Table of Contents

$25 million that effectively converted interest on $25 million of the debt from a variable rate to a fixed rate of 0.975%. The swap expires in June 2016, and there is no requirement under the Original Facility to enter into an additional swap agreement at that time.

The Original Facility provides a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit up to the aggregate amount of $150 million.million, all maturing on May 1, 2018. Borrowings under both the 2014 Revolver and the Term Loan bear interest

F-15


Table of Contents

 

The Original Facility also allowedTUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

based on either on Bank of America’s prime lending rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), each plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% to 3.00% contingent upon the latest Consolidated Leverage Ratio.

During the first half of 2016, the Company entered into two amendments to either increase the Original Facility or establish one or more new term loan commitments (an accordion feature), up to an aggregate amount not to exceed $300 million.

Amended Credit Agreement 

On February 26, 2016, we entered into(the “Amendments”): Waiver and Amendment No. 1, (the “Amendment”entered into on February 26, 2016 (“Amendment No. 1”) to, and Consent and Amendment No. 2, entered into on June 8, 2016 (“Amendment No. 2”). In Amendment No. 1, the Original Facility (collectively,lenders waived the “Credit Facility”) with BankCompany’s violation of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lenderits consolidated leverage ratio covenant and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. As aconsolidated fixed charge coverage ratio covenant. These violations were the result of the Company’s financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which included the previously reported $23.9 million non-cash, pre-tax charge fromrelated to an adverse ruling on the Brightwater litigation matter in the third quarter of 2015, as well as $45.6 million of pre-tax charges in the third and fourth quarters of 2015 for various Five Star Electric projects. In Amendment No. 2, the lenders consented to the issuance of the Convertible Notes subject to certain conditions, including the prepayment of $125 million on the Term Loan and the paydown of $69 million on the 2014 Revolver, and consented to a potential sale transaction of one of the Company’s business units in its Building segment, which the Company waslater decided not in compliance withto sell.

In addition to the required consolidated leverage ratioAmendments’ provisions discussed above, the Amendments also modified other provisions and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio underadded new provisions to the Original Facility, which are both calculated on a rolling four quarter basis. In theand Amendment the lenders waived these covenant violationsNo. 2 superseded and modified certainsome of the provisions of Amendment No. 1. The following reflects the more significant changes to the Original Facility.

TheFacility and the results of the Amendments that are now reflected in the 2014 Credit Facility provides for a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”) and a $250 million term loan (the “Term Loan”). As aFacility. Unless otherwise noted, the changes below were primarily the result of Amendment No. 1: (1) The Company may utilize LIBOR-based borrowings. (Amendment No. 1 precluded the Amendment, both the Revolver and the Term Loan will now mature on May 1, 2018. The Term Loan principal payments have been modified to include certain additional principal payments which will be applied against the balloon payment (discussed below). Borrowings under the Revolver bear interest, based either on Bankuse of America’s prime lending rate, plus an applicable margin, or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus an applicable margin. Borrowings under the Term Loan bear interest based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin. Under the terms of the Amendment, for so long as the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 3.5 to 1.0, it will not be permitted to make LIBOR-based borrowings and will beuntil the Company filed its compliance certificate for the fourth quarter of 2016; however, Amendment No. 2 negated this preclusion.) (2) The Company is subject to an increased interest rate on borrowings, with such rate being 100 basis points higher than the highest rate under the Original Facility whileif the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 3.5 to 1.03.50:1.00 but not more than 4.0 to 1.0,4.00:1.00, and an additional 100 basis points higher whileif the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 4.0 to 1.0.4.00:1.00. (3) The Company also will be subject to increased commitment fees at these higher leverage ratio levels. In addition, untilif the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio goes below 3.5 to 1.0, LIBOR-based borrowings will convert to base rate borrowings.is greater than 3.50:1.00. (4) The Amendment provides for the exclusion of the impact of the Brightwater litigation matter in the third quarter of 2015 is to be excluded from the calculation of the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio.ratio covenants. (5) Interest payments will beare due on a monthly basis, rather than a quarterly basis. Ifbasis; however, if the Company is in compliance with theits consolidated leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio covenants provided in the Original Facility as of December 31, 2016, the timing of interest payments will again be due on arevert to the terms of the Original Facility. As of December 31, 2016, the Company is in compliance with its consolidated leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio covenants provided in the Original Facility and the timing of our interest payments reverted back to the terms of the Original Facility, quarterly basis thereafter.for the Term Loan and base rate borrowings and upon maturity for Eurodollar borrowings. (6) The Amendment also removes the accordion feature of the Original Facility, which would have allowed as noted above, either an increase of $300 million in the 2014 Revolver or the establishment of one or more new term loan commitments.

commitments, is no longer available. (7) The Amendment also modifies several of the covenants in the Original Facility, including the Company’s maximum allowable consolidated leverage ratio was increased to be at 4.25:1.00 infor the first, quarter of 2016, stepping down to 4.0:1.0 in the second and third quarters of 2016 and then returningafter which it returns to the Original Facility’s range of 3.25:1.00 to 3.00:1.00. (Amendment No. 1 increased the Company’s maximum allowable consolidated leverage ratio covenant requirements to 4.25:1.00 beginning withfor the fourthfirst quarter of 2016 and 4.0:1.0 for the second and third quarters of 2016. Amendment No. 2 increased the maximum allowable consolidated leverage ratio covenant requirements to 4.25:1.00 for the second and third quarters of 2016.) (8) The Credit Facility will continueCompany is subject to require the Company to maintain a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1.00. Other usual and customary covenants for credit facilities of this type (such as, restrictions on the payment of dividends and share repurchases) were included in the Original Facility (subject to certain modifications made in the Amendment), while the Amendment addsadditional covenants regarding the Company’sits liquidity, including a cap on the cash balance in the Company’s bank account and a weekly minimum liquidity requirement (based on specified available cash balances and availability under the 2014 Revolver). (9) The Amendment also requires the Company is required to achieve certain cumulative quarterly cash collection milestones, and increases the lenders’ collateral package. Beginningwhich were eased somewhat in the fourth quarter of 2016, theAmendment No. 2. (10) The Company will beis required to make additional quarterly principal payments, towardswhich will be applied to the Term Loan balloon payment, with some of the payments based on a percentage of certain forecasted cash collections for the prior quarter. This change was effective in the fourth quarter in addition to the scheduled amortization payments of the Original Facility.

Substantially all of the Company’s subsidiaries unconditionally guarantee our obligations under the Credit Facility.2016. (11) The obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a lien on substantially all real and personal property of the Company and its subsidiaries party thereto. Under the Amendment, the Company agreed to increase the lenders’ collateral package includingwas increased by pledging to the lenders (i) the equity interests of each direct domestic subsidiary of the Company and (ii) 65% of the stock of each material first-tier foreign restricted subsidiary of the Company. (12) The 2014 Credit Facility will now mature on May 1, 2018, as opposed to June 5, 2019, the maturity date of the Original Facility.



As of December 31, 2016, there was $147.3 million available under the 2014 Revolver and the Company had utilized the 2014 Credit Facility for letters of credit in the amount of $0.2  million. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the 2014 Credit Facility for the period ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, the effective interest rate on the Term Loan balanceand the 2014 Revolver was $223.8 million at December 31, 2015. The next quarterly Term Loan payment under the Credit Facility is due4.68% and payable in March of 2016.5.05%, respectively.



2010 Senior Notes

In October 2010, the Company issued $300 million of 7.625% Senior Notes due November 1, 2018 (the “2010 Notes”) in a private placement offering. Interest on the 2010 Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The Company may

F-16F-16

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

We had $158.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our Revolverredeem the 2010 Notes at par beginning on November 1, 2016, which was not exercised as of December 31, 20152016. At the date of any redemption, any accrued and $130.0unpaid interest would also be due.

Convertible Notes

On June 15, 2016, the Company issued $200 million of outstanding borrowings2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2021 (the “Convertible Notes”) in a private placement offering.

To account for the Convertible Notes, the Company applied the provisions of ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options. ASC 470-20 requires issuers of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This is done by allocating the proceeds from issuance to the liability component based on the fair value of the debt instrument excluding the conversion feature, with the residual allocated to the equity component and classified in additional paid in capital. The $46.8 million difference between the principal amount of the Convertible Notes ($200.0 million) and the proceeds allocated to the liability component ($153.2 million) is treated as a discount on the Convertible Notes. This difference is being amortized as non-cash interest expense using the interest method, as discussed below under Interest Expense. The equity component, however, is not subject to amortization nor subsequent remeasurement.

In addition, ASC 470-20 requires that the debt issuance costs associated with a convertible debt instrument be allocated between the liability and equity components in proportion to the allocation of the debt proceeds between these two components. The debt issuance costs attributable to the liability component of the Convertible Notes ($5.1 million) are also treated as a discount on the Convertible Notes and amortized as non-cash interest expense. The debt issuance costs attributable to the equity component ($1.5 million) were netted with the equity component and will not be amortized.

The following table presents information related to the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes:

(in thousands)

As of
December 31,
2016

Liability component:

Principal

$

200,000 

Conversion feature

(46,800)

Allocated debt issuance costs

(5,051)

Amortization of discount and debt issuance costs (non-cash interest expense)

4,519 

Net carrying amount

$

152,668 

Equity component:

Conversion feature

$

46,800 

Allocated debt issuance costs

(1,543)

Net deferred tax liability

(18,815)

Net carrying amount

$

26,442 

The Convertible Notes, governed by the terms of an indenture between the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, are unsecured obligations and do not contain any financial covenants or restrictions on the payments of dividends, the incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance or repurchase of securities by the Company. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 2.875% per year, payable in cash semiannually in June and December.

Prior to January 15, 2021, the Convertible Notes will be convertible only under the following circumstances: (1) during the five business day period after any ten consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes for such trading day was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our Revolvercommon stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day; (2) during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on September 30, 2016, if the last reported sale price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion rate of 33.0579  (or $39.32), on each applicable trading day; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. On or after January 15, 2021 until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert all or any portion of their notes, in multiples of $1,000 principal amount, at the option of the holder regardless of the foregoing circumstances.

F-17


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Convertible Notes will be convertible at an initial conversion rate of 33.0579 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $30.25. The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment for some events but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, following certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date, the Company is required to increase, in certain circumstances, the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert their Convertible Notes in connection with such a corporate event including customary conversion rate adjustments in connection with a “make-whole fundamental change” described in the indenture. Upon conversion, and at the Company’s election, the Company may satisfy its conversion obligation by paying or delivering, as applicable, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock. As of December 31, 2014. We utilized the Revolver for letters of credit in the amount of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2015 and $1.0 million under the Revolver as of December 31, 2014. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2015, we had $141.8 million available to borrow under the Revolver.

There were no other material changes in our contractual debt obligations as of December 31, 2015. As2016, none of the filing dateconversion provisions of this Form 10-K and giving effect to the Amendment, we are in compliance with the modified financial covenants under the Credit Facility.Convertible Notes have been triggered.



Equipment Financing Mortgages and Acquisition-Related NotesMortgages



The Company has certain loans entered into for the purchase of specific property, plant and equipment and secured by the assets purchased. The aggregate balance of equipment financing loans was approximately $70.6$84.9 million and $102.0$115.6 million at December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively, with interest rates ranging from 2.12%1.90% to 4.85%5.93% with schedules calling for equal principal and interest payments over periods up to five years. The aggregate balance of transportation-equipment financing loans was approximately $45.0 million and $40.6 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, with interest rates ranging from a fixed 3.35% to LIBOR plus 3% and equal monthly installment payments over periods up to ten years and balloon payments of $12.4 million in 2021 and $6.15 million in 2022 on the remaining loans outstanding at December 31, 2015. The aggregate balance of mortgage loans was approximately $17.7 million and $18.9 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, with interest rates based on LIBOR plus applicable margins up to 3% or prime less 1.0%, depending on the loan, and equal monthly installment payments over periods up to ten years with additional balloon payments of $5.6$12.4 million in 2021 and $6.3 million in 2022 on the remaining loans outstanding at December 31, 2016. The aggregate balance of mortgage loans was approximately $16.7 million and $17.7 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, with interest rates ranging from a fixed 2.50% to LIBOR plus 3% and equal monthly installment payments over periods up to seven years with additional balloon payments of $2.6 million in 2018, $2.9 million in 2021 and $6.7 million in 2023.

During 2011, the Company issued approximately $21.7 million of 5% promissory notes in conjunction with an acquisition. The Company paid all outstanding principal and accrued interest on these notes in 2015.



The following table presents the future principal payments required under all of the Company’s debt obligations, discussed above, including the terms of the Amendment.

Amendments.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)

2016

 

$

88,917 

Year (in thousands)

 

 

2017

 

 

124,008 

 

$

85,890 

2018

 

 

407,575 

 

 

478,583 

2019

 

 

169,790 

 

 

12,294 

2020

 

 

4,824 

 

 

5,378 

2021

 

 

218,923 

Thereafter

 

 

28,334 

 

 

14,523 

 

$

823,448 

 

 

815,591 

Less: Unamortized Discount and Issuance Cost

 

 

(56,072)

Total

 

$

759,519 



Interest Expense

Interest Expense as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations consists of the following:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For the year ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Cash interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on 2014 Credit Facility

$

19,201 

 

$

14,368 

 

$

12,980 

Interest on 2010 Senior Notes

 

22,875 

 

 

22,875 

 

 

22,875 

Interest on Convertible Notes

 

3,115 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Other interest

 

3,623 

 

 

5,805 

 

 

7,910 

Total cash interest expense

 

48,814 

 

 

43,048 

 

 

43,765 

Non-cash interest expense:(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs on 2014 Credit Facility

 

5,447 

 

 

1,116 

 

 

1,319 

Amortization of discount and debt issuance costs on 2010 Senior Notes

 

1,002 

 

 

979 

 

 

951 

Amortization of discount and debt issuance costs on Convertible Notes

 

4,519 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total non-cash interest expense

 

10,968 

 

 

2,095 

 

 

2,270 

Total cash and non-cash interest expense

$

59,782 

 

$

45,143 

 

$

46,035 

(a)  Non-cash interest expense produces effective interest rates that are higher than contractual rates; accordingly, the effective interest rates for the 2014 Credit Facility, the 2010 Senior Notes and the Convertible Notes are 9.86%,  7.99% and 9.39%, respectively.

F-18


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Leases



The Company leases certain construction equipment, vehicles and office space under non-cancelablenon-cancellable operating leases. Futureleases, with future minimum rent payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2015 are2016 as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)

2016

 

$

26,819 

Year (in thousands)

 

 

2017

 

 

19,958 

 

$

22,950 

2018

 

 

15,478 

 

 

13,612 

2019

 

 

10,549 

 

 

9,983 

2020

 

 

8,923 

 

 

7,417 

2021

 

 

5,455 

Thereafter

 

 

24,927 

 

 

19,260 

Subtotal

 

$

106,654 

 

 

78,677 

Less - Sublease rental agreements

 

 

(3,833)

 

 

(3,150)

Total

 

$

102,821 

 

$

75,527 



Rental expense under operating leases of construction equipment, vehicles and office space was $28.2 million in 2016, $17.4 million in 2015 and $24.4 million in 2014 and $18.5 million in 2013.2014.

  

F-17


Table of Contents

6.     Income Taxes



Income before taxes is summarized as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

United States Operations

 

$

69,822 

 

$

170,517 

 

$

127,682 

 

$

128,072 

 

$

69,822 

 

$

170,517 

Foreign Operations

 

$

4,017 

 

$

16,921 

 

$

11,933 

 

 

21,043 

 

 

4,017 

 

 

16,921 

Total

 

$

73,839 

 

$

187,438 

 

$

139,615 

 

$

149,115 

 

$

73,839 

 

$

187,438 





The provision for income taxes is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Current expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

5,465 

 

$

45,074 

 

$

29,034 

 

$

43,850 

 

$

5,465 

 

$

45,074 

State

 

 

(362)

 

11,174 

 

9,018 

 

 

13,039 

 

(362)

 

11,174 

Foreign

 

 

1,126 

 

 

3,203 

 

 

4,256 

 

 

6,573 

 

 

1,126 

 

 

3,203 

Total current

 

 

6,229 

 

 

59,451 

 

 

42,308 

 

 

63,462 

 

 

6,229 

 

 

59,451 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred (benefit) expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

19,583 

 

9,992 

 

9,547 

 

 

(3,054)

 

19,583 

 

9,992 

State

 

 

2,735 

 

10,059 

 

577 

 

 

(5,302)

 

2,735 

 

10,059 

Foreign

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(113)

 

 

(1,813)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total deferred

 

 

22,318 

 

 

20,051 

 

 

10,011 

 

 

(10,169)

 

 

22,318 

 

 

20,051 

Total provision

 

$

28,547 

 

$

79,502 

 

$

52,319 

 

$

53,293 

 

$

28,547 

 

$

79,502 







F-19


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following table is a reconciliation of the Company’s provision for income taxes at the statutory rates to the provision for income taxes at the Company’s effective rate.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

(dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

Federal income expense at statutory tax rate

 

$

25,844 

 

35.0 

%

 

$

65,603 

 

35.0 

%

 

$

48,865 

 

35.0 

%

 

$

52,190 

 

35.0 

%

 

$

25,844 

 

35.0 

%

 

$

65,603 

 

35.0 

%

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

 

1,250 

 

1.7 

 

 

10,367 

 

5.5 

 

 

6,236 

 

4.5 

 

 

5,972 

 

4.0 

 

 

1,250 

 

1.7 

 

 

10,367 

 

5.5 

 

Officers' compensation

 

2,900 

 

3.9 

 

 

3,657 

 

2.0 

 

 

1,732 

 

1.2 

 

 

3,807 

 

2.6 

 

 

2,900 

 

3.9 

 

 

3,657 

 

2.0 

 

Domestic Production Activities Deduction

 

(1,499)

 

(2.0)

 

 

(5,170)

 

(2.8)

 

 

(3,641)

 

(2.6)

 

 

(4,018)

 

(2.7)

 

 

(1,499)

 

(2.0)

 

 

(5,170)

 

(2.8)

 

Impact of state tax rate changes on deferreds

 

2,435 

 

3.3 

 

 

3,245 

 

1.7 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

Impact of state tax rate changes on deferred taxes

 

(1,358)

 

(0.9)

 

 

2,435 

 

3.3 

 

 

3,245 

 

1.7 

 

Other

 

 

(2,383)

 

(3.2)

 

 

 

1,800 

 

1.0 

 

 

 

(873)

 

(0.6)

 

 

 

(3,300)

 

(2.3)

 

 

 

(2,383)

 

(3.2)

 

 

 

1,800 

 

1.0 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

$

28,547 

 

38.7 

%

 

$

79,502 

 

42.4 

%

 

$

52,319 

 

37.5 

%

 

$

53,293 

 

35.7 

%

 

$

28,547 

 

38.7 

%

 

$

79,502 

 

42.4 

%





The Company’s provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 20152016 were significantly impacted by a favorable discrete item related to the reversalrate changes associated with shifts of FIN 48 reserves due to the resolution of certainrevenue affecting state tax matters.apportionment as well as various return-to-provision and depreciation adjustments. The Company’s provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2014 were significantly impacted by a shift in revenue to projects in higher state tax jurisdictions, causing an increasedecrease in the state tax rate. The increase in state tax rate was applied to deferred tax balances, which further increaseddecreased the effective rate. Higher non‑deductible compensation expense also contributed to this increase.



F-18


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

Deferred Tax Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timing of expense recognition

 

$

58,048 

 

$

47,017 

 

$

36,055 

 

$

23,580 

Net operating losses

 

3,564 

 

2,188 

 

10,140 

 

5,478 

Other, net

 

 

114,225 

 

 

6,980 

 

 

33,507 

 

 

29,342 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

175,837 

 

 

56,185 

 

 

79,702 

 

 

58,400 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(460)

 

 

(1,369)

 

 

(460)

 

 

(460)

Net deferred tax assets

 

 

175,377 

 

 

54,816 

 

 

79,242 

 

 

57,940 

Deferred Tax Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets, due primarily to purchase accounting

 

(99,549)

 

(26,094)

 

(34,679)

 

(37,157)

Fixed assets, due primarily to purchase accounting

 

(101,022)

 

(90,886)

 

(107,081)

 

(100,516)

Construction contract accounting

 

(7,530)

 

(6,854)

 

(12,564)

 

(9,197)

Joint ventures - construction

 

(27,604)

 

(30,654)

 

(29,609)

 

(29,949)

Other

 

 

(62,494)

 

 

(10,012)

 

 

(24,970)

 

 

(3,943)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(298,199)

 

 

(164,500)

 

 

(208,903)

 

 

(180,762)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(122,822)

 

$

(109,684)

 

$

(129,661)

 

$

(122,822)







The net deferred tax liability is classifiedpresented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on  when the  future tax benefit or expense is expected to be realized as  follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

Current deferred tax asset

 

$

26,306 

 

$

17,962 

Long-term deferred tax asset

 

 

149,071 

 

 

36,854 

Current deferred tax liability

 

 

(24,889)

 

 

(14,129)

Long-term deferred tax liability

 

 

(273,310)

 

 

(150,371)

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(122,822)

 

$

(109,684)



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2016

 

2015

Deferred tax asset

 

$

1,346 

 

$

 —

Deferred tax liability

 

 

(131,007)

 

 

(122,822)

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(129,661)

 

$

(122,822)

Subsequent to the issuance of our 2015 consolidated financial statements, the Company identified that certain immaterial classification adjustments, related to the offsetting of deferred assets and liabilities by tax jurisdiction, were necessary to properly present deferred tax assets and liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015. The accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015, the corresponding balance sheet amounts within the business segments footnote (Note 10) and the guarantor footnote (Note 13), have been corrected for the effect of this classification error. The Company has evaluated the effects of the

F-20


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

classification adjustments as of December 31, 2015 based on the SEC’s guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, Materiality, and after consideration of both quantitative and qualitative factors, has concluded that the following adjustments are immaterial:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

As of December 31, 2015

(in thousands)

 

As Previously Reported

 

Adjustments

 

As Restated (a)

Total current assets

 

$

2,635,245 

 

$

(24,889)

 

$

2,610,356 

Other assets

 

 

202,125 

 

 

(149,071)

 

 

53,054 

Total assets

 

 

4,042,441 

 

 

(173,960)

 

 

3,868,481 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

 

(159,016)

 

 

24,889 

 

 

(134,127)

Total current liabilities

 

 

(1,473,708)

 

 

24,889 

 

 

(1,448,819)

Total liabilities

 

 

(2,622,214)

 

 

173,960 

 

 

(2,448,254)

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 

 

(4,042,441)

 

 

173,960 

 

 

(3,868,481)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

As of December 31, 2015

(in thousands)

 

As Previously Reported

 

Adjustments

 

As Restated (a)

Current deferred tax asset

 

$

26,306 

 

$

(24,889)

 

$

1,417 

Long-term deferred tax asset

 

 

149,071 

 

 

(149,071)

 

 

 —

Current deferred tax liability

 

 

(24,889)

 

 

24,889 

 

 

 —

Long-term deferred tax liability

 

 

(273,310)

 

 

149,071 

 

 

(124,239)

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(122,822)

 

$

 —

 

$

(122,822)

(a)

The amounts reflected are prior to the Company's adoption of ASU 2015-03 (see discussion in Note 1) and ASU 2015-17, discussed below.

In addition to the immaterial classification adjustments reflected above, the Company identified certain immaterial classification errors within the disclosure of the significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2015. The following is a revised summary of the significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect adjustments for the immaterial classification errors as of December 31, 2015:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

As of December 31, 2015

(in thousands)

 

As Previously Reported

 

Adjustments

 

As Restated

Deferred Tax Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timing of expense recognition

 

$

58,048 

 

$

(34,468)

 

$

23,580 

Net operating losses

 

 

3,564 

 

 

1,914 

 

 

5,478 

Other, net

 

 

114,225 

 

 

(84,883)

 

 

29,342 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

175,837 

 

 

(117,437)

 

 

58,400 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(460)

 

 

 —

 

 

(460)

Net deferred tax assets

 

 

175,377 

 

 

(117,437)

 

 

57,940 

Deferred Tax Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets, due primarily to purchase accounting

 

 

(99,549)

 

 

62,392 

 

 

(37,157)

Fixed assets, due primarily to purchase accounting

 

 

(101,022)

 

 

506 

 

 

(100,516)

Construction contract accounting

 

 

(7,530)

 

 

(1,667)

 

 

(9,197)

Joint ventures - construction

 

 

(27,604)

 

 

(2,345)

 

 

(29,949)

Other

 

 

(62,494)

 

 

58,551 

 

 

(3,943)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(298,199)

 

 

117,437 

 

 

(180,762)

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(122,822)

 

$

 —

 

$

(122,822)

The Company has also elected to early adopt ASU 2015-17, effective as of the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2016. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2015-17, the Company has retrospectively adjusted the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 to

F-21


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

reflect the provisions of the ASU. The adoption of ASU 2015-17 resulted in a reclassification of $1.4 million of deferred tax assets classified as current to long-term as of December 31, 2015. Upon adoption of ASU 2015-17, the resulting long-term deferred asset of $1.4 million was offset against the Company’s net deferred tax liabilities within the same jurisdiction.



The Company had a valuation allowance of $0.5 million and $1.4 million as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014, respectively,2015 for federal and state capital loss carryforwards as the ultimate utilization of this item was not likely.



The Company has not provided for deferred income taxes or foreign withholding tax on basis differences in its non-U.S. subsidiaries that result from undistributed earnings aggregating $12.1$19.7 million which the Company has the intent and the ability to reinvest in its foreign operations. Generally, the U.S. income taxes imposed upon repatriation of undistributed earnings would be reduced by foreign tax credits from foreign income taxes paid on the earnings. Determination of the deferred income tax liability on these basis differences is not reasonably estimable because such liability, if any, is dependent on circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs.



The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as an element of income tax expense. The cumulative amounts related to interest and penalties are added to the total unrecognized tax liabilities on the balance sheet. The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 20152016 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $3.6$7.6 million. During 2014,2016, the Company recognized a net increase of $2.2$4.0 million in liabilities. The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2015 was $3.6 million. During 2015, the Company recognized a net decrease of $4 million in liabilities. The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2014 was $7.6 million.million in liabilities. During 2013,2014, the Company recognized a net increase of $1.4 million in liabilities.  The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2013 was $5.5$2.2 million in liabilities. The Company does not expect any significant release of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.



F-19


Table of Contents

The Company accounts for its uncertain tax positions in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of these tax benefits for the twothree years ended December 31, 20152016 is as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Beginning balance

 

$

7,636 

 

$

5,459 

 

$

4,023 

 

$

3,612 

 

$

7,636 

 

$

5,459 

Change in tax positions of prior years

 

 

(3,073)

 

426 

 

 

182 

 

 

3,543 

 

(3,073)

 

 

426 

Change in tax positions of current year

 

 

169 

 

2,929 

 

 

1,254 

 

 

419 

 

169 

 

 

2,929 

Reduction in tax positions for statute expirations

 

 

(1,120)

 

 

(1,178)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,120)

 

 

(1,178)

Ending Balance

 

$

3,612 

 

$

7,636 

 

$

5,459 

 

$

7,574 

 

$

3,612 

 

$

7,636 





We conduct business internationally and, as a result, one or more of our subsidiaries files income tax returns in U.S. federal, U.S. state and certain foreign jurisdictions. Accordingly, in the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities principally throughout the United States, Guam and Canada. We are no longer under examination by the taxing authority regarding any U.S. federal income tax returns for years before 2011 while the years open for examination under various state and local jurisdictions vary.

  

7.     Contingencies and Commitments



The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in litigation and are contingently liable for commitments and performance guarantees arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company and certain of its customers have made claims arising from the performance under their contracts. The Company recognizes certain significant claims for recovery of incurred cost when it is probable that the claim will result in additional contract revenue and when the amount of the claim can be reliably estimated. These assessments require judgments concerning matters such as litigation developments and outcomes, the anticipated outcome of negotiations, the number of future claims and the cost of both pending and future claims. In addition, because most contingencies are resolved over long periods of time, assets and liabilities may change in the future due to various factors. Management believes that, based on current information and discussions with the Company’s legal counsel, the ultimate resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.



Several matters are in the litigation and dispute resolution process and represent contingent losses or gains to the Company.process. The following discussion provides a background and current status of the more significant matters.

Tutor-Saliba-Perini Joint Venture vs. Los Angeles MTA Matter

During 1995, Tutor-Saliba-Perini (“Joint Venture”) filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles against the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“LAMTA”), seeking to recover costs for extra work required by LAMTA in connection with the construction of certain tunnel and station projects, all of which were completed by 1996. In 1999, LAMTA countered with civil claims under the California False Claims Act against the Joint Venture, Tutor-Saliba and Perini Corporation jointly and severally (together, “TSP”), and obtained a judgment that was reversed on appeal and remanded for retrial before a different judge.

Between 2005 and 2010, the court granted certain Joint Venture motions and LAMTA capitulated on others, which reduced the number of false claims LAMTA may seek and limited LAMTA’s claims for damages and penalties. In September 2010, LAMTA dismissed its remaining claims and agreed to pay the entire amount of the Joint Venture’s remaining claims plus interest. In the remanded proceedings, the Court subsequently entered judgment in favor of TSP and against LAMTA in the amount of $3.0 million after deducting $0.5 million, representing the tunnel handrail verdict plus accrued interest against TSP. The parties filed post-trial motions for costs and fees. The Court ruled that TSP’s sureties could recover costs, LAMTA could recover costs for the tunnel handrail trial and no party could recover attorneys’ fees. TSP appealed the false claims jury verdict on the tunnel handrail claim and other issues, including the denial of TSP’s and its sureties’ request for attorneys’ fees. LAMTA subsequently filed its cross-appeal. In June 2014, the Court of Appeal issued its decision reversing judgment on the People’s Unfair Competition claim and reversing the denial of TSP’s Sureties’ request for attorney’s fees and affirming the remainder of the judgment. In January 2015, payment was made by LAMTA in the amount of $3.8 million in settlement of all outstanding issues except for the attorney’s fees for TSP’s Sureties.

On May 1, 2015, TSP’s Surety’s motions for attorney’s fees were heard, and the Court issued its written ruling on May 5, 2015 in favor of TSP’s Sureties for a total award of $2.1 million. The Court denied adding interest onto these amounts. On June 26, 2015, payment was made by LAMTA for these amounts, which was received by TSP. Based on the Court’s decision, the Company wrote off the remaining booked position, which was immaterial to its consolidated financial statements. On June 23, 2015, TSP’s Sureties filed a Notice of Appeal challenging the amount awarded to seek an increase. The appeal remains pending while the Court prepares the trial record for the Court of Appeal. However, the Company does not expect the ultimate resolution of this matter to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. 

F-20F-22

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Long Island Expressway/Cross Island Parkway Matter



The Company reconstructed the Long Island Expressway/Cross Island Parkway Interchange project for the New York State Department of Transportation (the “NYSDOT”). The $130 million project was substantially completed in January 2004 and was accepted by the NYSDOT as finally complete in February 2006. The Company incurred significant added costs in completing its work and suffered extended schedule costs due to numerous design errors, undisclosed utility conflicts, lack of coordination with local agencies and other interferences for which the Company believes the NYSDOT is responsible.



In March 2011, the Company filed its claim and complaint with the New York State Court of Claims and served to the New York State Attorney General’s Office, seeking damages in the amount of $53.8 million. In May 2011, the NYSDOT filed a motion to dismiss the Company’s claim on the grounds that the Company had not provided required documentation for project closeout and filing of a claim. In September 2011, the Company reached agreement on final payment with the Comptroller’s Office on behalf of the NYSDOT which resulted in an amount of $0.5 million payable to the Company and formally closed out the project allowing the Company to re-file its claim. The Company re-filed its claim in the amount of $53.8 million with the NYSDOT in February 2012 and with the Court of Claims in March 2012. In May 2012, the NYSDOT served its answer and counterclaims in the amount of $151 million alleging fraud in the inducement and punitive damages related to disadvantaged business enterprise (“DBE”) requirements for the project. The Court subsequently ruled that NYSDOT’s counterclaims may only be asserted as a defense and offset to the Company’s claims and not as affirmative claims. In November 2014, the Appellate Division First Department affirmed the dismissal of the City’s affirmative defenses and affirmative counterclaims based on DBE fraud. The Company does not expect the counterclaims to have any material effect on its consolidated financial statements.



Management has made an estimate of the total anticipated recovery on this project, and such estimate is included in revenue recorded to date. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement varies from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements at that time.



Fontainebleau Matter



Desert Mechanical Inc. (“DMI”) and Fisk Electric Company (“Fisk”), wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, were subcontractors on the Fontainebleau Project in Las Vegas (“Fontainebleau”), a hotel/casino complex with approximately 3,800 rooms. In June 2009, Fontainebleau filed for bankruptcy protection, under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, in the Southern District of Florida. Fontainebleau is headquartered in Miami, Florida.



DMI and Fisk filed liens in Nevada for approximately $44 million, representing unreimbursed costs to date and lost profits, including anticipated profits. Other unaffiliated subcontractors have also filed liens. In June 2009, DMI filed suit against Turnberry West Construction, Inc., the general contractor, in the 8th Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada (the “District Court”), and in May 2010, the court entered an order in favor of DMI for approximately $45 million.



In January 2010, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of the property to Icahn Nevada Gaming Acquisition, LLC, and this transaction closed in February 2010. As a result of a July 2010 ruling relating to certain priming liens, there was approximately $125 million set aside from this sale, which is available for distribution to satisfy the creditor claims based on seniority. At that time, the total estimated sustainable lien amount was approximately $350 million. The project lender filed suit against the mechanic’s lien claimants, including DMI and Fisk, alleging that certain mechanic’s liens are invalid and that all mechanic’s liens are subordinate to the lender’s claims against the property. The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in October 2012 in an advisory opinion at the request of the Bankruptcy Court that lien priorities would be determined in favor of the mechanic lien holders under Nevada law.



In October 2013, a settlement was reached by and among the Statutory Lienholders and the other interested parties. The agreed upon settlement has not had an impact onBankruptcy Court appointed a mediator to facilitate the Company’s recorded accounting position as of the year ended December 31, 2015. The execution of that settlement agreement continues under the supervision of a mediator appointed by the Bankruptcy Court.agreement. Settlement discussions are ongoing.



Management has made an estimate of the total anticipated recovery on this project, and such estimate is included in revenue recorded to date. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement varies from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements at that time.



Honeywell Street/Queens Boulevard Bridges Matter



In 1999, the Company was awarded a contract for reconstruction of the Honeywell Street/Queens Boulevard Bridges project for the City of New York (the “City”). In June 2003, after substantial completion of the project, the Company initiated an action to recover $8.8 million in claims against the City on behalf of itself and its subcontractors. In March 2010, the City filed counterclaims for $74.6

F-23


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

$74.6 million and other relief, alleging fraud in connection with the DBE requirements for the project. In May 2010, the Company served the City with its response to the City’s counterclaims and affirmative defenses. In August 2013, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss the City’s affirmative defenses and counterclaims relating to fraud.

In September 2013,January 2017, the Court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the Company’s claim against the City of New York. The Company has filed a Noticenotice of Appeal to

F-21


Tableappeal. The Court also granted the Company’s motion for summary judgment for release of Contents

the Court’s decision; said appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Court in November 2014. Discovery is ongoing and is expected to conclude in early 2016.retention plus interest from 2010 for an aggregate amount of approximately $1.1 million.



The Company does not expect ultimate resolution of this matter to have any material effect on its consolidated financial statements.



Westgate Planet Hollywood Matter



Tutor-Saliba Corporation (“TSC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, contracted to construct a timeshare development project in Las Vegas which was substantially completed in December 2009. The Company’s claims against the owner, Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC (“WPH”), relate to unresolved owner change orders and other claims. The Company filed a lien on the project in the amount of $23.2 million, and filed its complaint with the District Court, Clark County, Nevada. Several subcontractors have also recorded liens, some of which have been released by bonds and some of which have been released as a result of subsequent payment. WPH has posted a mechanic’s lien release bond for $22.3 million.



WPH filed a cross-complaint alleging non-conforming and defective work for approximately $51 million, primarily related to alleged defects, misallocated costs, and liquidated damages. WPH revised the amount of their counterclaims to approximately $45 million.



Following multiple post-trial motions, final judgment was entered in this matter on March 20, 2014. TSC was awarded total judgment in the amount of $19.7 million on its breach of contract claim, which includes an award of interest up through the date of judgment, plus attorney’s fees and costs. WPH has paid $0.6 million of that judgment. WPH was awarded total judgment in the amount of $3.1 million on its construction defect claims, which includes interest up through the date of judgment. The awards are not offsetting. WPH and its Sureties have filed a notice of appeal. TSC has filed a notice of appeal on the defect award. In July 2014, the Court ordered WPH to post an additional supersedeas bond on appeal, in the amount of $1.7 million, in addition to the lien release bond of $22.3 million, which increases the security up to $24.0 million. The Nevada Supreme Court is anticipated to rulehas not yet ruled on this matter during the first quarter of 2016.matter.



The Company does not expect ultimate resolution of this matter to have any material effect on its consolidated financial statements. Management has made an estimate of the total anticipated recovery on this project and such estimate is included in revenue recorded to date. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement varies from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements at that time.

Brightwater Matter

In 2006, the Department of Natural Resources and Parks Wastewater Treatment Division of King County (“King County”), as Owner, and Vinci Construction Grands Projects/Parsons RCI/Frontier-Kemper, Joint Venture (“VPFK”), as Contractor, entered into a contract to construct the Brightwater Conveyance System and tunnel sections in Washington State. Frontier-Kemper, a 20% minority partner in the joint venture, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company that was acquired in June 2011.

In April 2010, King County filed a lawsuit alleging damages in the amount of $74 million, plus costs, for VPFK’s failure to complete specified components of the project in the King County Superior Court, State of Washington. Shortly thereafter, VPFK filed a counterclaim in the amount of approximately $75 million, seeking reimbursement for additional costs incurred as a result of differing site conditions, King County’s defective specifications, and for damages sustained on VPFK’s tunnel boring machines (“TBM”), and increased costs as a result of hyperbaric interventions. VPFK’s claims were presented to a Dispute Resolution Board who generally found that King County was liable to VPFK for VPFK’s claims for encountering differing site conditions, including damages to the TBM, but not on claims related to defective design specifications. From June through August 2012, each party filed several motions for summary judgment on certain claims and requests in preparation for trial, which were heard and ruled upon by the Court. The Court granted and denied various requests of each party related to evidence and damages.

In December 2012, a jury verdict was received in favor of King County in the amount of $155.8 million and a verdict in favor of VPFK in the amount of $26.3 million. In late April 2013, the Court ruled on post-trial motions and ordered VPFK’s sureties to pay King County’s attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $14.7 million. All other motions were denied. On May 7, 2013, VPFK paid the full verdict amount and the associated fees, thus terminating any interest on the judgment. VPFK’s notice of appeal was filed on May 31, 2013. King County has appealed approximately $17.0 million of the verdict award in VPFK’s favor and VPFK’s sureties have appealed the Court’s order granting King County’s request for legal fees and costs. Oral argument was held on March 9, 2015.

The Company received notice on November 9, 2015, that the Court of Appeals of the State of Washington filed their decision that day, which affirmed the trial court’s judgment and denied the appeals brought forth by both VPFK and King County. Management booked the impact of this judgment during the third quarter of 2015, resulting in a non-cash, pre-tax charge of $23.9 million. The Court granted King County’s request for recovery of reasonable attorney fees and appellate costs but did not quantify an amount. The Company does not expect the award of attorney fees, while not specifically determinable, to have a material financial impact on its consolidated financial statements.

F-22


Table of Contents

156 Stations Matter

In December 2003, Five Star Electric Corporation (“FSE”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an agreement with the Prime Contractor Transit Technologies, L.L.C., a Consortium member of Siemens Transportation Transit Technologies, L.L.C., to assist in the installation of new public address and customer information screens system for each of the 156 stations for the New York City Transit Authority as the owner.

In June 2012, an arbitration panel awarded FSE a total of approximately $11.9 million. Subsequently, the Court affirmed FSE’s position; however, it decided that only $8.5 million of the total arbitration award of $11.9 million can be recovered against the payment bond. In December 2014, FSE filed its reply for the motion for re-argument with regard to the reduction in recoverable costs against the payment bond.

This matter was fully settled in April 2015 and payment was received. The settlement amount was consistent with the Company’s recorded position and, accordingly, the settlement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.



U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Matter



Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. (“R&S”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a contract with the United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) for the construction of a 287,000 square-foot facility for NOAA’s Southwest Fisheries Science Center Replacement Headquarters and Laboratory in La Jolla, California. The contract work began on May 24, 2010, and was substantially completed in September 2012. R&S incurred significant additional costs as a result of a design that contained errors and omissions, NOAA’s unwillingness to correct design flaws in a timely fashion and a refusal to negotiate the time and pricing associated with change order work.



R&S has filed three certified claims against NOAA for contract adjustments related to the unresolved Owner change orders, delays, design deficiencies and other claims. The First Certified Claim was submitted on August 20, 2013, in the amount of $26.8 million ("First Certified Claim") and the Second Certified Claim was submitted on October 30, 2013, in the amount of $2.6 million ("Second Certified Claim") and the Third Certified Claim was submitted on October 1, 2014 in the amount of $0.7 million (“Third Certified Claim”).



NOAA requested an extension to issue a decision on the First Certified Claim and on the Third Certified Claim, but did not request an extension of time to review the Second Certified Claim. On January 6, 2014, R&S filed suit in the United States Federal Court of Claims on the Second Certified Claim plus interest and attorney's fees and costs. This was followed by a submission of a lawsuit on the First Certified Claim on July 31, 2014. In February 2015, the Court denied NOAA’s motion to dismiss the Second Certified Claim. In March 2015, the Contracting Officer issued decisions on all Claims accepting a total of approximately $1.0 million of claims and denying approximately $29.5 million of claims. On April 14, 2015, the Court consolidated the cases and has commenced discovery through mid-2016. No trial date has been set.cases. Trial is scheduled to commence in December 2017.



F-24


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Management has made an estimate of the total anticipated recovery on this project, and such estimate is included in revenue recorded to date. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement varies from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements at that time.



Five Star Electric Matter



In the third quarter of 2015, Five Star Electric CorpCorp. ("Five Star"), a subsidiary of the Company that was acquired in 2011, entered into a tolling agreement related to an ongoing investigation being conducted by the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York (“USAO EDNY”). The tolling agreement extended the statute of limitations to avoid the expiration of any unexpired statute of limitations while the investigation is pending. Five Star has been cooperating with the USAO EDNY since late June 2014, when it was first made aware of the investigation, and has been providing information related to its use of certain minority-owned, women-owned, small and disadvantaged business enterprises and, in addition, most recently, information regarding certain of Five Star’s employee compensation, benefit and tax practices. The investigation covers the period of 2005-2014.



The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the investigation and cannot accurately estimate any potential liability that Five Star or the Company may incur or the impact of the results of the investigation on Five Star or the Company.



Alaskan Way Viaduct Matter



In January 2011, Seattle Tunnel Partners (“STP”), a joint venture between Dragados USA, Inc. and the Company, entered into a design-build contract with the Washington State Department of Transportation ("WSDOT"(“WSDOT”) for the construction of a large diameter bored tunnel in downtown Seattle, King County, Washington to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct, also known as State Route 99.

F-23


Table of Contents



The construction of the large diameter bored tunnel requires the use of a tunnel boring machine (“TBM”). In December 2013, the TBM struck a steel pipe, installed by WSDOT as a well casing for an exploratory well. The TBM was damaged and was required to be shut down for repair. STP has asserted that the steel pipe casing was a differing site condition that WSDOT failed to properly disclose. The Disputes Review Board mandated by the contract to hear disputes issued a decision finding the steel casing was a Type I differing site condition. WSDOT has not accepted that finding.



The TBM is insured under a Builder’s Risk Insurance Policy (“the Policy”) with Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC and a consortium of other insurers (the “Insurers”). STP submitted the claims to the insurer and requested interim payments under the Policy. The Insurers refused to pay and denied coverage. In June 2015, STP filed a lawsuit in the King County Superior Court, State of Washington (“Washington Superior Court”) seeking declaratory relief concerning contract interpretation as well as damages as a result of the Insurers’ breach of its obligations under the terms of the Policy, and addedPolicy. WSDOT asis deemed a defendantplaintiff since WSDOT is an insured under the Policy and had filed its own claim for damages. In August 2015,Hitachi, the Insurers filedmanufacturer of the TBM, has also joined the case as a complaint inplaintiff for costs incurred to repair the Supreme Court, State of New York County seeking declaratory relief concerning contract interpretation. The Court in New York has stayeddamages to the Insurers’ lawsuit pending a decision from the Washington State Court.TBM. Trial is scheduled for June 2018.  



In October 2015,March 2016, WSDOT filed a complaint against STP in the KingThurston County Superior Court State of Washington for breach of contract alleging STP’s delays and failure to perform and declaratory relief concerning contract interpretation. STP filed its answer to WSDOT’s complaint and filed a counterclaim against WSDOT and against the manufacturer of the TBM. Trial is set for June 2018.



As of December 2015,31, 2016, the Company has concluded that the potential for a material adverse financial impact due to the Insurer’s and WSDOT’s respective legal actions areis neither probable nor remote. ManagementWith respect to STP’s counterclaim, management has madeincluded an estimate of the total anticipated recovery, on this projectconcluded to be both probable and such estimate is includedreliably estimable, in revenue recorded to date. To the extent new facts become known or the final recovery included in the claim settlement varies from the estimate, the impact of the change will be reflected in the financial statements at that time.

  

8.     Share-Based Compensation





The Company’s executive share-based compensation planAmended and Restated Tutor Perini Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) provides for various types of share-based grants, including restricted and unrestricted stock units and stock options. Restricted and unrestricted stock units give the holder the right to exchange their restricted stock units for shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis. Stock options give the holder the right to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the stock option’s award. AwardsRestricted stock units and stock options are usually subject to certain service and performance conditions and may not be sold or otherwise transferred until those restrictions have been satisfied.satisfied; however, unrestricted stock units have no such restrictions. The term for stock options is limited to 10 years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2015,2016, there were 489,022327,584 shares available to be granted under the Company’s share-based compensation plan. Many of the awards under the plan allow for the fractional earning of the entire award based on achieving separate vesting criteria for separate performance periods. The Company accounts for each fractional portion of these awards as a separate grant, with the grant date established at the date when the performance target for a given period is set and communicated to the grantee. As of December 31, 2015, there were 754,500 restricted stock units and 722,000 stock options that have been awarded, but are not yet granted.

F-24F-25

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Many of the awards issued under the Plan contain separate tranches, each for a separate performance period and each with a performance target to be established subsequent to the award date; accordingly, the tranches are accounted for under ASC 718 Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) as separate grants, with the grant date being the date the performance targets for a given tranche are established and communicated to the grantee. Similarly, for these awards, compliance with the requirements of the Plan is also based on the number of units granted in a given year, as determined by ASC 718, rather than the number of units awarded in a given year. As a result, as of December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding awards with 448,000 restricted stock units and 448,000 stock options that had not been granted yet. These units will be granted in 2017, 2018 and 2019 when the performance targets for those respective years are established.

The following table summarizes restricted stock unit and stock option activity:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Restricted Stock Units

 

Stock Options



 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

Weighted-



 

 

Average

 

 

 

Average



 

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

Exercise/



 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(Strike) Price



Number

 

Per Share

 

Number

 

Per Share

Outstanding as of December 31, 2013

361,668 

 

$

17.30 

 

1,295,000 

 

$

20.20 

Granted

996,597 

 

 

27.10 

 

714,000 

 

 

18.40 

Expired or forfeited

(20,000)

 

 

24.77 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Vested/exercised

(281,668)

 

 

16.76 

 

(20,000)

 

 

12.54 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2014

1,056,597 

 

$

26.54 

 

1,989,000 

 

$

19.63 

Granted

321,500 

 

 

23.07 

 

259,000 

 

 

16.07 

Expired or forfeited

(281,560)

 

 

23.89 

 

(250,000)

 

 

15.97 

Vested/exercised

(370,940)

 

 

27.07 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Outstanding as of December 31, 2015

725,597 

 

$

25.28 

 

1,998,000 

 

$

19.62 

Granted

483,387 

 

 

19.14 

 

274,000 

 

 

16.20 

Vested/exercised

(52,500)

 

 

18.74 

 

(97,500)

 

 

12.72 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2016

1,156,484 

 

$

22.64 

 

2,174,500 

 

$

19.50 

The following table summarizes unrestricted stock units issued to the members of the Company’s Board of Directors as part of their annual retainers:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

Stock Options

 

 

 

Weighted-Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

��

Weighted-Average

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Exercise/(Strike)

 

Number

 

Per Share

 

Number

 

Price Per Share

Outstanding as of December 31, 2012

1,141,666 

 

$

18.12 

 

1,315,465 

 

$

18.91 

Granted

246,668 

 

 

19.87 

 

200,000 

 

 

20.80 

Expired or forfeited

(176,667)

 

 

13.66 

 

(140,000)

 

 

13.04 

Vested/exercised

(849,999)

 

 

19.91 

 

(80,465)

 

 

13.16 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2013

361,668 

 

$

17.30 

 

1,295,000 

 

$

20.20 

Granted

996,597 

 

 

27.10 

 

714,000 

 

 

18.40 

Expired or forfeited

(20,000)

 

 

24.77 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Vested/exercised

(281,668)

 

 

16.76 

 

(20,000)

 

 

12.54 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2014

1,056,597 

 

$

26.54 

 

1,989,000 

 

$

19.63 

Granted

321,500 

 

 

23.07 

 

259,000 

 

 

16.07 

Expired or forfeited

(281,560)

 

 

23.89 

 

(250,000)

 

 

15.97 

Vested/exercised

(370,940)

 

 

27.07 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Outstanding as of December 31, 2015

725,597 

 

$

25.28 

 

1,998,000 

 

$

19.62 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Unrestricted Stock Units



 

 

 

 

Weighted-



 

 

 

 

Average



 

 

 

 

Grant Date



 

 

 

 

Fair Value

Year

 

Number

 

Per Share

2014

 

$

47,873 

 

$

30.81 

2015

 

 

68,160 

 

 

21.93 

2016

 

 

64,603 

 

 

21.67 

The fair value of unrestricted stock units issued during 2016, 2015 and 2014 was approximately $1.4 million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively.



The fair value of restricted stock units that vested during 2016,  2015 2014 and 20132014 was approximately $8.0$1.0 million,  $8.0 million and $17.5$8.0 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value, representing the difference between the market value on the date of exercise and the option price of the stock options exercised during 2016 and 2014 and 2013 was $0.3$1.1 million and $0.6$0.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the balance of unamortized restricted stock and stock option expense was $7.5$6.5 million and $1.9$0.7 million, respectively, which will be recognized over weighted-average periods of 1.61.3 years for restricted stock units and 1.40.5 years for stock options. 

F-26


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The 1,998,0002,174,500 outstanding stock options as of December 31, 20152016 had an intrinsic value of $3.0$18.5 million and a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 4.94.3 years. Of those outstanding options:  1)  1,485,0001,402,500 were exercisable with an intrinsic value of $1.6$11.3 million, a weighted-average exercise price of $19.57$19.95 per share and a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 4.03.1 years; and 2) 513,000772,000 have been granted but have not vested, of which 483,000756,876 are expected to vest and have an intrinsic value of $1.3$7.2 million, a weighted-average exercise price of $19.27$18.49 and a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 7.36.5 years.



The fair value on the grant date and the significant assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Total stock options granted

 

259,000 

 

 

714,000 

 

 

200,000 

 

 

274,000 

 

 

259,000 

 

 

714,000 

 

Weighted-average grant date fair value

$

12.48 

 

 

$

17.69 

 

 

$

7.90 

 

$

5.31 

 

 

$

12.48 

 

 

$

17.69 

 

Weighted-average assumptions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-Free Rate

 

1.3 

%

 

 

1.8 

%

 

 

0.8 

%

 

1.2 

%

 

 

1.3 

%

 

 

1.8 

%

Expected life of options(a)

 

4.7 

 

 

 

5.7 

 

 

 

4.1 

 

 

4.2 

 

 

 

4.7 

 

 

 

5.7 

 

Expected volatility(b)

 

45.5 

%

 

 

50.6 

%

 

 

51.2 

%

 

40.6 

%

 

 

45.5 

%

 

 

50.6 

%

Expected quarterly dividends

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 


(a)

Calculated using the simplified method due to the terms of the stock options and the limited pool of grantees.

(b)

Calculated using historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over periods commensurate with the expected life of the option.



TheFor the respective years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company recognized, as part of general and administrative expense, costcosts for stock-based payment arrangements for both employees of $13.4 million,  $9.5 million and $18.6  million and $6.6non-employee directors of $1.4 million, for the years ended December 31, 2015,  2014$1.5 million and 2013, respectively,$1.4 million, with related aggregate tax benefits for those years of $4.0$6.1 million, $7.5$4.6  million and $2.6$8.1  million, respectively.



  

F-25


Table of Contents

9.     Business Segments

The Company offers general contracting, pre-construction planning and comprehensive project management services, including planning and scheduling of the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for the timely completion of a project in accordance with the terms and specifications contained in a construction contract. The Company also offers self-performed construction services, including site work, concrete forming and placement, steel erection, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and HVAC. Our business is conducted through three segments: Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors, as described further below. These segments are determined based on how the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (chief operating decision maker) aggregates business units when evaluating performance and allocating resources.

The Civil segment specializes in public works construction and the repair, replacement and reconstruction of infrastructure. The civil contracting services include construction and rehabilitation of highways, bridges, mass-transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities.

The Building segment has significant experience providing services to a number of specialized building markets for private and public works customers, including the high-rise residential, hospitality and gaming, transportation, health care,  commercial and government offices, sports and entertainment, education, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical, industrial and high-tech markets.

The Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems and pneumatically placed concrete for a full range of civil and building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass-transit end markets. This segment provides unique strengthens and capabilities which position the Company as a full-service contractor with greater control over scheduled work, project delivery and risk management.

The following tables set forth certain reportable segment information relating to the Company’s operations for the years ended December 31, 2015,  2014 and 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reportable Segments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty

 

Segment

 

 

 

Consolidated

(in thousands)

Civil

 

Building

 

Contractors

 

Total

 

Corporate

 

Total

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenue

$

2,005,193 

 

$

1,900,492 

 

$

1,228,030 

 

$

5,133,715 

 

$

 —

 

$

5,133,715 

Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(115,286)

 

 

(97,957)

 

 

 —

 

 

(213,243)

 

 

 —

 

 

(213,243)

Revenue from external customers

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,802,535 

 

$

1,228,030 

 

$

4,920,472 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,920,472 

Income from construction operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before litigation-related charge

$

169,073 

 

$

(1,240)

 

$

15,682 

 

$

183,515 

 

$

(54,242)

(a)

$

129,273 

Litigation-related charge (b)

 

(23,860)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(23,860)

 

 

 —

 

 

(23,860)

Total

$

145,213 

 

$

(1,240)

 

$

15,682 

 

$

159,655 

 

$

(54,242)

 

$

105,413 

Capital Expenditures

$

8,383 

 

$

2,877 

 

$

1,193 

 

$

12,453 

 

$

23,459 

 

$

35,912 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenue

$

1,730,468 

 

$

1,558,431 

 

$

1,301,328 

 

$

4,590,227 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,590,227 

Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(43,324)

 

 

(54,594)

 

 

 —

 

 

(97,918)

 

 

 —

 

 

(97,918)

Revenue from external customers

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,503,837 

 

$

1,301,328 

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,492,309 

Income from construction operations

 

220,554 

 

 

24,697 

 

 

50,998 

 

 

296,249 

 

 

(54,559)

(a)

 

241,690 

Capital Expenditures

$

65,377 

 

$

735 

 

$

6,974 

 

$

73,086 

 

$

1,927 

 

$

75,013 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenue

$

1,519,370 

 

$

1,622,705 

 

$

1,182,844 

 

$

4,324,919 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,324,919 

Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(77,954)

 

 

(70,726)

 

 

(567)

 

 

(149,247)

 

 

 —

 

 

(149,247)

Revenue from external customers

$

1,441,416 

 

$

1,551,979 

 

$

1,182,277 

 

$

4,175,672 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,175,672 

Income from construction operations

 

177,667 

 

 

24,579 

 

 

49,008 

 

 

251,254 

 

 

(47,432)

(a)

 

203,822 

Capital Expenditures

$

32,489 

 

$

1,666 

 

$

4,137 

 

$

38,292 

 

$

6,999 

 

$

45,291 

(a)

Consists primarily of corporate general and administrative expenses.

(b)

The Company recorded a non-cash, pre-tax charge of $23.9 million for an adverse appellate court decision related to a long-standing litigation matter for which the Company, as part of a 2011 acquisition, assumed liability as a minority partner in a joint venture for a project that had already been completed. (For further information, refer to the Brightwater Matter discussion in Note 7.)

F-26


Table of Contents

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded unfavorable adjustments totaling $45.6 million in income from construction operations ($0.53 in diluted EPS) related to various Five Star Electric projects in New York, none of which were individually material. Most of these projects are complete or nearing completion. In addition, there were unfavorable adjustments to the estimated cost to complete a Building segment project, which has been completed and resulted in a decrease of $24.3 million in income from construction operations  ($0.28 in diluted EPS).  Furthermore, the Company recorded a non-cash litigation-related charge for the Brightwater Matter, which resulted in a $23.9 million in income from construction operations ($0.28 in diluted EPS), as discussed in Note 7. Finally, the Company recorded favorable adjustments for a Civil segment runway reconstruction project, which resulted in an increase of $13.7 million in income from construction operations  ($0.16 in diluted EPS).

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company's income from construction operations was positively impacted by changes in the estimated recoveries on two Civil segment projects and a Building segment hospitality and gaming project. These changes in estimates were driven by changes in cost recovery assumptions based on legal rulings pertaining to the Civil segment projects, as well as agreements reached with a customer regarding the Building segment hospitality and gaming project. The Building project change in estimate resulted in an $11.4 million increase in income from construction operations  ($0.14 in diluted EPS). With respect to the two Civil segment projects, there was an increase of $25.9 million in income from construction operations ($0.30 in diluted EPS) and a $9.4 million decrease in income from construction operations  ($0.11 in diluted EPS).

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company’s income from construction operations was increased by $13.8 million ($0.18 in diluted EPS) because of changes in the estimated recovery on a Building segment hospitality and gaming project. These changes were a result of changes in facts and circumstances that occurred during 2013.

The above were the only changes in estimates considered individually material to the Company’s results of operations during the periods presented herein.

The following table sets forth the total assets for the reportable segments as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

Building

$

798,022 

 

$

680,933 

Civil

 

1,964,674 

 

 

1,814,170 

Specialty Contractors

 

863,242 

 

 

775,162 

Corporate and other (a)

 

416,503 

 

 

503,050 

Total Assets

$

4,042,441 

 

$

3,773,315 

(a)

Consists principally of cash and cash equivalents and corporate transportation equipment.

Geographic Information

Information concerning principal geographic areas is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

$

4,694,165 

 

$

4,323,471 

 

$

4,000,380 

Foreign and U.S. territories

 

226,307 

 

 

168,838 

 

 

175,292 

Total

$

4,920,472 

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

4,175,672 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from construction operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

$

128,869 

 

$

268,566 

 

$

238,989 

Foreign and U.S. territories

 

30,786 

 

 

27,683 

 

 

12,265 

Corporate

 

(54,242)

 

 

(54,559)

 

 

(47,432)

Total

$

105,413 

 

$

241,690 

 

$

203,822 

F-27


Table of Contents

Income from construction operations has been allocated geographically based on the location of the job site.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

United States

$

3,868,449 

 

$

3,612,997 

Foreign and U.S. territories

 

173,992 

 

 

160,318 

Total Assets

$

4,042,441 

 

$

3,773,315 

Reconciliation of Segment Information to Consolidated Amounts

The following table reconciles segment results to the consolidated income before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

Income from construction operations

$

105,413 

 

$

241,690 

 

$

203,822 

Other income (expense), net

 

12,453 

 

 

(9,536)

 

 

(18,575)

Interest expense

 

(44,027)

 

 

(44,716)

 

 

(45,632)

Income before income taxes

$

73,839 

 

$

187,438 

 

$

139,615 

10.     Employee Benefit Plans



Defined Benefit Pension Plan



The Company has a defined benefit pension plan that covers certain of its executive, professional, administrative and clerical employees, subject to certain specified service requirements. The plan is noncontributory and benefits are based on an employee’s years of service and “final average earnings,” as defined by the plan. The plan provides reduced benefits for early retirement and takes into account offsets for social security benefits. The Company also has an unfunded supplemental retirement plan (“Benefit Equalization Plan”) for certain employees whose benefits under the defined benefit pension plan were reduced because of compensation limitations under federal tax laws. Effective June 1, 2004, all benefit accruals under the Company’s pension plan and Benefit Equalization Plan were frozen; however, the current vested benefit was preserved. Pension disclosure as presented below includes aggregated amounts for both of the Company’s plans, except where otherwise indicated.



The Company historically has used the date of its fiscal year-end as its measurement date to determine the funded status of the plan.



The long-term investment goals of our plan are to manage the assets in accordance with the legal requirements of all applicable laws; produce investment returns which maximize return within reasonable and prudent levels of risks; and achieve a fully funded status with regard to current pension liabilities. Some risk must be assumed in order to achieve the investment goals. Investments with the ability to withstand short and intermediate term variability are considered and some interim fluctuations in market value and rates of return are tolerated in order to achieve the plan’s longer-term objectives.



The pension plan’s assets are managed by a third-party investment manager. The Company monitors investment manager is limited to pursuing the investment strategies regarding asset mix and purchases and sales of securities within the parameters defined in the Investment Objectives & Policy Statement and investment management agreement. Investment performance and risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment meetings.basis.



F-27


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

A summary of net periodic benefit cost is as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

 

2013

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Interest cost

$

4,055 

 

 

$

4,144 

 

 

$

3,710 

 

$

4,153 

 

 

$

4,055 

 

 

$

4,144 

 

Service cost

 

600 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(5,021)

 

 

(4,797)

 

 

(4,509)

 

 

(4,803)

 

 

 

(5,021)

 

 

 

(4,797)

 

Recognized net actuarial losses

 

1,869 

 

 

 

4,385 

 

 

 

6,330 

 

 

1,745 

 

 

 

1,869 

 

 

 

4,385 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

$

903 

 

 

$

3,732 

 

 

$

5,531 

 

$

1,695 

 

 

$

903 

 

 

$

3,732 

 

Actuarial assumptions used to determine net cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

3.75 

%

 

4.47 

%

 

3.58 

%

 

4.10 

%

 

 

3.75 

%

 

 

4.47 

%

Expected return on assets

 

6.50 

%

 

6.75 

%

 

6.75 

%

 

6.00 

%

 

 

6.50 

%

 

 

6.75 

%

Rate of increase in compensation

 

n.a.

 

 

n.a.

 

 

n.a.

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 



F-28


Table of Contents

The target asset allocation for the Company’s pension plan by asset category for 20162017 and the actual asset allocation as of December 31, 20152016 and 20142015 by asset category are as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31,

 

Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31,

 

Target

 

 

 

Target

 

 

 

 

Allocation

 

Actual Allocation

 

Allocation

 

 

Actual Allocation

Asset Category

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

Cash

 

%

 

%

 

%

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

65 

 

 

61 

 

 

63 

 

 

50 

 

 

 

47 

 

 

 

61 

 

International

 

25 

 

 

30 

 

 

26 

 

 

25 

 

 

 

28 

 

 

 

30 

 

Fixed income securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20 

 

 

 

21 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

 

100 

%

 

 

100 

%



As of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, plan assets included approximately $44.1$39.1 million and $45.5$52.1 million, respectively, of investments in hedge funds and equity partnerships which do not have readily determinable fair values. The underlying holdings of the funds arewere comprised of a combination of assets for which the estimate of fair value is determined using information provided by fund managers.



The Company expects to contribute approximately $1.8$2.6 million to its defined benefit pension plan in 2016. 2017.  

Future benefit payments under the plans are estimated as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

(in thousands)

 

2016

$

6,399 

(in thousands)

 

 

2017

 

6,439 

$

6,488 

2018

 

6,601 

 

6,632 

2019

 

6,687 

 

6,691 

2020

 

6,720 

 

6,717 

2021

 

6,732 

Thereafter

 

33,510 

 

32,722 

$

66,356 

Total

$

65,982 



F-28


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of plan assets and plan benefit obligations during 20152016 and 2014,2015, and a summary of the funded status as of December 31, 20152016 and 20142015





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

2016

 

2015

Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

75,956 

 

$

72,617 

$

72,296 

 

$

75,956 

Actual return on plan assets

 

(984)

 

 

3,711 

 

(1,909)

 

 

(984)

Company contribution

 

2,900 

 

 

5,213 

 

2,025 

 

 

2,900 

Benefit payments

 

(5,576)

 

 

(5,585)

 

(6,355)

 

 

(5,576)

Balance at end of year

$

72,296 

 

$

75,956 

$

66,057 

 

$

72,296 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

Change in Benefit Obligations

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

110,923 

 

$

95,178 

Interest cost

 

4,055 

 

 

4,144 

Assumption change (gain) loss

 

(3,838)

 

 

17,054 

Actuarial loss

 

378 

 

 

132 

Benefit payments

 

(5,576)

 

 

(5,585)

Balance at end of year

$

105,942 

 

$

110,923 

F-29


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

Funded status

$

(33,646)

 

$

(34,967)

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

$

(218)

 

$

(218)

Long-term liabilities

 

(33,428)

 

 

(34,749)

Net amount recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

$

(33,646)

 

$

(34,967)



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Change in Benefit Obligations

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

105,942 

 

$

110,923 

Interest cost

 

4,153 

 

 

4,055 

Service cost

 

600 

 

 

 —

Assumption change (gain) loss

 

308 

 

 

(3,838)

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

(967)

 

 

378 

Benefit payments

 

(6,355)

 

 

(5,576)

Balance at end of year

$

103,681 

 

$

105,942 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2015

 

2014

Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and included in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss

$

(56,824)

 

$

(56,147)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(56,824)

 

 

(56,147)

Cumulative Company contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost

 

23,178 

 

 

21,180 

Net amount recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

$

(33,646)

 

$

(34,967)



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Funded status

$

(37,624)

 

$

(33,646)

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

$

(271)

 

$

(218)

Long-term liabilities

 

(37,353)

 

 

(33,428)

Net amount recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

$

(37,624)

 

$

(33,646)



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and included in accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss

$

(61,132)

 

$

(56,824)

Cumulative Company contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost

 

23,508 

 

 

23,178 

Net amount recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

$

(37,624)

 

$

(33,646)



The netchange in actuarial gain arisingloss during the period netted against the amortization of the previously existing actuarial loss resultedresulting from changed assumptions was $4.3 million in a net other comprehensive loss of2016,  $0.7 million in 2015 and $13.9 million in 2014, and a net comprehensive gain of $18.7 million in 2013.2014.



The estimated amount of the net accumulated loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net period benefit cost in 20162017 is $1.7$1.8 million.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2015

 

2014

Actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

4.10 

%

 

3.75 

%

Rate of increase in compensation

n.a.

 

 

n.a.

 

Measurement date

December 31

 

 

December 31

 

The discount rate used in determining the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was 3.9% as of December 31, 2016 and 4.1% as of December 31, 2015. The discount rate used for the accumulated post-retirement obligation was derived using a blend of U.S. Treasury and high-quality corporate bond discount rates.



The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption was 6.0% for 2016 and 6.5% for 2015 and 6.75% for 2014.2015. The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption was developed considering forward looking capital market assumptions and historical return expectations for each asset class assuming the Company’splans’ target asset allocation and full availability of invested assets.



F-29


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fund strategies seek to capitalize on inefficiencies identified across different asset classes or markets. Hedge fund strategy types include long-short, event-driven, multi-strategy, equity partnerships and distressed credit.

Plan assets arewere measured at fair value. The following provides a description of the valuation techniques employed for each major asset class: Corporate equities arewere valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities arewere purchased.

Registered investment companies are public investment vehicles valued using the Net Asset Value (NAV) of shares held by the plan at year-end. The NAV is a quoted price in an active market and classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Closely held funds held by the plan, which are only available through private offerings, do not have readily determinable fair values. Estimates of fair value of these funds arewere determined using the information provided by the fund managers and it is generally based on the net asset value per share or its equivalent. Corporate bonds arewere valued based on market values quoted by dealers who are market makers in these securities, and by independent pricing services which use multiple valuation techniques that incorporate available market information and proprietary valuation models using market characteristics, such as benchmark yield curve, coupon rates, credit spreads, estimated default rates and other features.



F-30


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the plan assets at fair value in accordance with the fair value hierarchy described in Note 3:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

As of December 31, 2014

As of December 31, 2016

 

As of December 31, 2015

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

(in thousands)

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total Value

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total Value

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

2,654 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

2,654 

 

$

4,693 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

4,693 

$

2,437 

 

$

2,437 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

2,654 

 

$

2,654 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Fixed Income

 

4,029 

 

 —

 

 —

 

4,029 

 

3,824 

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,824 

 

14,023 

 

14,023 

 

 —

 

 —

 

4,029 

 

4,029 

 

 —

 

 —

Equities

 

6,566 

 

 —

 

 —

 

6,566 

 

7,676 

 

 —

 

 —

 

7,676 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

6,566 

 

6,566 

 

 —

 

 —

Mutual Funds

 

6,994 

 

 —

 

 —

 

6,994 

 

6,550 

 

 —

 

 —

 

6,550 

 

10,489 

 

 

10,489 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

6,994 

 

 

6,994 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

$

26,949 

 

$

26,949 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

20,243 

 

$

20,243 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Closely held funds(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Partnerships

 

 —

 

7,920 

 

 —

 

7,920 

 

 —

 

7,723 

 

 —

 

7,723 

 

6,931 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,920 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedge Fund Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

324 

 

 —

 

 —

 

324 

 

1,010 

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,010 

Long-Short Equity Fund

 

 —

 

12,640 

 

16,370 

 

29,010 

 

 —

 

15,878 

 

12,755 

 

28,633 

Event-Driven Fund

 

 —

 

3,618 

 

6,984 

 

10,602 

 

 —

 

3,471 

 

9,562 

 

13,033 

Distressed Credit

 

 —

 

 —

 

935 

 

935 

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,320 

 

1,320 

Multi-Strategy Fund

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,262 

 

1,262 

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,494 

 

1,494 

Private Credit

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,000 

 

 

2,000 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Hedge Fund Investments

 

32,177 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,133 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total closely held funds(a)

 

39,108 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,053 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

$

20,567 

 

$

24,178 

 

$

27,551 

 

$

72,296 

 

$

23,753 

 

$

27,072 

 

$

25,131 

 

$

75,956 

$

66,057 

 

$

26,949 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

72,296 

 

$

20,243 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —






Fund strategies seek to capitalize on inefficiencies identified across different asset classes or markets. Hedge fund strategy types include long-short, event-driven, multi-strategy and distressed credit. Generally, the redemption of the Company’s hedge fund investments is subject to certain notice-period requirements and, as such, the Company has classified these assets as Level 3 assets.

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Level 3 assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in Fair Value of Level 3 Assets

 

Long-Short

 

Event-Driven

 

Distressed

 

Multi-Strategy

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Equity Fund

 

Fund

 

Credit

 

Fund

 

Private Credit

 

Total

Balance, December 31, 2013

$

10,863 

 

$

8,863 

 

$

2,199 

 

$

1,799 

 

$

 —

 

$

23,724 

Realized gains

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

16 

Unrealized gains

 

843 

 

 

505 

 

 

57 

 

 

59 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,464 

Purchases

 

1,049 

 

 

16 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,076 

Sales

 

 —

 

 

(2,512)

 

 

(954)

 

 

(373)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,839)

Reclassified to Level 3 (a)

 

 —

 

 

2,690 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,690 

Balance, December 31, 2014

$

12,755 

 

$

9,562 

 

$

1,320 

 

$

1,494 

 

$

 —

 

$

25,131 

Realized gains

 

(50)

 

 

(16)

 

 

(7)

 

 

(9)

 

 

 —

 

 

(82)

Unrealized gains

 

581 

 

 

(585)

 

 

(28)

 

 

(38)

 

 

 —

 

 

(70)

Purchases

 

5,631 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

225 

 

 

2,642 

 

 

8,498 

Sales

 

(2,547)

 

 

(1,977)

 

 

(350)

 

 

(410)

 

 

(642)

 

 

(5,926)

Balance, December 31, 2015

$

16,370 

 

$

6,984 

 

$

935 

 

$

1,262 

 

$

2,000 

 

$

27,551 


(a)

The transferClosely held funds in private investment were measured at fair value using NAV and were not categorized in the fair value hierarchy. Although the investments were not categorized within the fair value hierarchy, the holdings of $2.7 million from Level 2 to Level 3 wasthese private investment funds were comprised of certain hedge funds thata combination of Level 1, 2 and 3 investments, but were moved duenot categorized in the fair value hierarchy because they were measured at NAV using the practical expedient. This is a change from prior years’ presentation as there is no longer a requirement to liquidity.categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the NAV per share practical expedient. 

 

F-31


Table of Contents

The Company’s plans have benefit obligations in excess of the fair value of the plans’ assets. The following table provides information relating to each of the plans’ benefit obligations compared to the fair value of its assets:plan’s assets detailed as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

As of December 31, 2014

As of December 31, 2016

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

 

 

Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit

 

 

 

Pension

 

Equalization

 

 

 

 

Pension

 

Equalization

 

 

 

Pension

 

Equalization

 

 

 

 

Pension

 

Equalization

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Plan

 

Plan

 

Total

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Total

Plan

 

Plan

 

Total

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Total

Projected benefit obligation

$

102,495 

 

$

3,447 

 

$

105,942 

 

$

107,570 

 

$

3,353 

 

$

110,923 

$

100,336 

 

$

3,345 

 

$

103,681 

 

$

102,495 

 

$

3,447 

 

$

105,942 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

102,495 

 

 

3,447 

 

 

105,942 

 

 

107,570 

 

 

3,353 

 

 

110,923 

 

100,336 

 

 

3,345 

 

 

103,681 

 

 

102,495 

 

 

3,447 

 

 

105,942 

Fair value of plan assets

 

72,296 

 

 

 —

 

 

72,296 

 

 

75,956 

 

 

 —

 

 

75,956 

Projected benefit obligation greater than fair value of plan assets

$

30,199 

 

$

3,447 

 

$

33,646 

 

$

31,614 

 

$

3,353 

 

$

34,967 

Accumulated benefit obligation greater than fair value of plan assets

$

30,199 

 

$

3,447 

 

$

33,646 

 

$

31,614 

 

$

3,353 

 

$

34,967 

Fair value of plans' assets

 

66,057 

 

 

 —

 

 

66,057 

 

 

72,296 

 

 

 —

 

 

72,296 

Projected benefit obligation greater than fair value of plans' assets

$

34,279 

 

$

3,345 

 

$

37,624 

 

$

30,199 

 

$

3,447 

 

$

33,646 

Accumulated benefit obligation greater than fair value of plans' assets

$

34,279 

 

$

3,345 

 

$

37,624 

 

$

30,199 

 

$

3,447 

 

$

33,646 



Section 401(k) Plans



The Company has several contributory Section 401(k) plans which cover its executive, professional, administrative and clerical employees, subject to certain specified service requirements. The 401(k) expense provision was $4.0 million in both 2016 and 2015 and $3.6 million in 2014 and $3.8 million in 2013.2014. The Company’s contribution is based on a non-discretionary match of employees’ contributions, as defined by each plan.

F-30


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Cash-Based Compensation Plans



The Company has multiple cash-based compensation plans and a share-based incentive compensation plan for key employees, which are generally based on the Company’s achievement of a certain level of profit. For information on the Company’s share-based incentive compensation plan, see Note 8.



Multiemployer Plans



In addition to the Company’s defined benefit pension and contribution plans discussed above, the Company participates in multiemployer pension plans for its union construction employees. Contributions are based on the hours worked by employees covered under various collective bargaining agreements. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a contributor to a multiemployer plan is only liable for its proportionate share of a plan’s unfunded vested liability upon termination, or withdrawal from, a plan. The Company currently has no intention of withdrawing from any of the multiemployer pension plans in which it participates and, therefore, has not recognized a liability for its proportionate share of any unfunded vested liabilities associated with these plans. 



The following tables summarize key information for the plans that the Company had significant involvement with during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013.2014.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIP/RP 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIP/RP 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

Pension Protections Act

 

Status

 

Company Contributions

 

 

 

Collective

 

 

 

Pension Protections Act

 

Status

 

Company Contributions

 

 

 

Collective

 

EIN/Pension

 

Zone Status

 

Pending Or

 

(amounts in millions)

 

Surcharge

 

Bargaining

 

EIN/Pension

 

Zone Status

 

Pending Or

 

(amounts in millions)

 

Surcharge

 

Bargaining

Pension Fund

 

Plan Number

 

2015

 

2014

 

Implemented

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

Imposed

 

Agreement

 

Plan Number

 

2016

 

2015

 

Implemented

 

2016 (b)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Imposed

 

Agreement

Pension, Hospitalization and Benefit Plan of the Electrical Industry - Pension Trust Account

 

13-6123601/001

 

Green

 

Green

 

No

 

13.6 

(a)

 

11.8 

(a)

 

13.4 

(a)

 

No

 

5/31/2016

The Pension, Hospitalization and Benefit Plan of the Electrical Industry - Pension Trust Fund

 

13-6123601/001

 

Green

 

Green

 

N/A

 

$     15.8 

 

 

$     13.6 

(a)

 

$     11.8 

(a)

 

No

 

5/31/2019

Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California

 

94-6277608

 

Yellow

 

Yellow

 

Implemented

 

5.6 

 

 

2.8 

 

 

1.9 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2019

Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California

 

94-6050970

 

Red

 

Red

 

Implemented

 

4.4 

 

 

2.7 

 

 

1.9 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2019

Excavators Union Local 731 Pension Fund

 

13-1809825/002

 

Green

 

Green

 

N/A

 

4.2 

 

 

7.1 

 

 

5.3 

 

 

No

 

4/30/2022

Steamfitters Industry Pension Fund

 

13-6149680/001

 

Green

 

Yellow

 

No

 

6.2 

(a)

 

5.1 

(a)

 

4.3 

(a)

 

No

 

6/30/2017

 

13-6149680/001

 

Green

 

Green

 

N/A

 

3.9 

 

 

6.2 

(a)

 

5.1 

(a)

 

No

 

6/30/2017

Excavators Union Local 731 Pension Fund

 

13-1809825/002

 

Green

 

Green

 

No

 

7.1 

 

 

5.3 

 

 

3.2 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2016

Iron Workers Locals 40,361 & 417 Pension Fund

 

51-6102576/001

 

Green

 

Yellow

 

Implemented

 

3.8 

 

 

5.2 

(a)

 

0.7 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2020

Local 147 Construction Workers Retirement Fund

 

13-6528181

 

Green

 

Green

 

No

 

5.6 

(a)

 

1.3 

 

 

0.2 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2018

 

13-6528181

 

Green

 

Green

 

N/A

 

3.7 

 

 

5.6 

(a)

 

1.3 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2018

Iron Workers Locals 40,361 & 417 Pension Fund

 

51-6102576/001

 

Yellow

 

Yellow

 

Implemented

 

5.2 

(a)

 

0.7 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2020

New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Plan

 

51-0174276/001

 

Green (b)

 

Green

 

No

 

3.1 

 

 

2.6 

 

 

1.6 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2016

Southern California Gunite Workers Pension Fund

 

95-4354179

 

Green

 

Green

 

N/A

 

3.5 

 

 

0.7 

 

 

0.7 

 

 

No

 

6/30/2019


(a)

These amounts exceeded 5% of the respective total plan contributions.

(b)

Pension Protection Act zone status isThe Company's contributions as a percentage of July 1, 2015 and 2014, respectively.total plan contributions were not available for any of our plans.



In addition to the individually significant plans described above, the Company also contributed approximately $40.6$38.8 million in 2016,  $37.5 million in 2015 $32.7and $30.8 million in 2014 and $31.4 million in 2013 to other multiemployer pension plans.

  

10.     Business Segments

The Company offers general contracting, pre-construction planning and comprehensive project management services, including planning and scheduling of manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for the timely completion of a project in accordance with the terms and specifications contained in a construction contract. The Company also offers self-performed construction services: site work, concrete forming and placement, steel erection, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC). As described below, our business is conducted through three segments: Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors. These segments are determined based on how the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (chief operating decision maker) aggregates business units when evaluating performance and allocating resources.

The Civil segment specializes in public works construction and the replacement and reconstruction of infrastructure. The civil contracting services include construction and rehabilitation of highways, bridges, tunnels, mass-transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities.

The Building segment has significant experience providing services to a number of specialized building markets for private and public works customers, including the high-rise residential, hospitality and gaming, transportation, health care, commercial and government offices, sports and entertainment, education, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical, industrial and high-tech markets.

F-32F-31

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems and pneumatically placed concrete for a full range of civil and building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass-transit end markets. This segment provides the Company with unique strengths and capabilities that allow the Company to position itself as a full-service contractor with greater control over scheduled work, project delivery and risk management.

The following tables set forth certain reportable segment information relating to the Company’s operations for the years ended December 31, 2016,  2015 and 2014.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Reportable Segments

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Specialty

 

Segment

 

 

 

Consolidated

(in thousands)

Civil

 

Building

 

Contractors

 

Total

 

Corporate

 

Total

Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

$

1,830,857 

 

$

2,146,747 

 

$

1,234,272 

 

$

5,211,876 

 

$

 —

 

$

5,211,876 

Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(161,894)

 

 

(76,906)

 

 

 —

 

 

(238,800)

 

 

 —

 

 

(238,800)

Revenue from external customers

$

1,668,963 

 

$

2,069,841 

 

$

1,234,272 

 

$

4,973,076 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,973,076 

Income from construction operations

$

172,668 

 

$

51,564 

 

$

37,908 

 

$

262,140 

 

$

(60,220)

(a)

$

201,920 

Capital expenditures

$

13,541 

 

$

516 

 

$

1,005 

 

$

15,062 

 

$

681 

 

$

15,743 

Depreciation and amortization (b)

$

48,561 

 

$

2,186 

 

$

5,035 

 

$

55,782 

 

$

11,520 

 

$

67,302 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenue

$

2,005,193 

 

$

1,900,492 

 

$

1,228,030 

 

$

5,133,715 

 

$

 —

 

$

5,133,715 

Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(115,286)

 

 

(97,957)

 

 

 —

 

 

(213,243)

 

 

 —

 

 

(213,243)

Revenue from external customers

$

1,889,907 

 

$

1,802,535 

 

$

1,228,030 

 

$

4,920,472 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,920,472 

Income from construction operations

$

145,213 

 

$

(1,240)

 

$

15,682 

 

$

159,655 

 

$

(54,242)

(a)

$

105,413 

Capital expenditures

$

8,383 

 

$

2,877 

 

$

1,193 

 

$

12,453 

 

$

23,459 

 

$

35,912 

Depreciation and amortization (b)

$

22,601 

 

$

2,728 

 

$

5,507 

 

$

30,836 

 

$

10,798 

 

$

41,634 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenue

$

1,730,468 

 

$

1,558,431 

 

$

1,301,328 

 

$

4,590,227 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,590,227 

Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(43,324)

 

 

(54,594)

 

 

 —

 

 

(97,918)

 

 

 —

 

 

(97,918)

Revenue from external customers

$

1,687,144 

 

$

1,503,837 

 

$

1,301,328 

 

$

4,492,309 

 

$

 —

 

$

4,492,309 

Income from construction operations

$

220,554 

 

$

24,697 

 

$

50,998 

 

$

296,249 

 

$

(54,559)

(a)

$

241,690 

Capital expenditures

$

65,377 

 

$

735 

 

$

6,974 

 

$

73,086 

 

$

1,927 

 

$

75,013 

Depreciation and amortization (b)

$

31,674 

 

$

3,466 

 

$

12,018 

 

$

47,158 

 

$

6,544 

 

$

53,702 

(a)

Consists primarily of corporate general and administrative expenses.

(b)

Depreciation and amortization is included in income from construction operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded the following offsetting adjustments in the Specialty Contractors segment: a favorable adjustment of $14.0 million for a completed project ($0.17 per diluted share) and an unfavorable adjustment of $13.8 million for a project that is substantially complete ($0.16 per diluted share). 

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded unfavorable adjustments in the Specialty Contractors segment totaling $45.6 million in income from construction operations ($0.53 per diluted share) related to various Five Star Electric projects in New York, none of which were individually material. Most of these projects are complete or nearing completion. In addition, there were unfavorable adjustments to the estimated cost to complete a Building segment project, which has been completed and resulted in a decrease of $24.3 million in income from construction operations ($0.28 per diluted share). Furthermore, the Company recorded an unfavorable adjustment totaling $23.9 million ($0.28 per diluted share) in the Civil segment for an adverse legal decision related to a long-standing litigation matter, for which the Company assumed liability as part of an acquisition in 2011. Finally, the Company recorded favorable adjustments for a Civil segment runway reconstruction project, which resulted in an increase of $13.7 million in income from construction operations ($0.16 per diluted share).

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company’s income from construction operations was positively impacted by changes in the estimated recoveries on two Civil segment projects and a Building segment hospitality and gaming project. The changes in estimates were driven by changes in cost recovery assumptions based on legal rulings pertaining to the Civil segment projects, as well as agreements reached with a customer regarding the Building segment hospitality and gaming project. The Building project change in

F-32


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

estimate resulted in an $11.4 million increase in income from construction operations ($0.14 per diluted share). With respect to the two Civil segment projects, there was an increase of $25.9 million in income from construction operations ($0.30 per diluted share) and a $9.4 million decrease in income from construction operations ($0.11 per diluted share).

The above were the only changes in estimates considered material to the Company’s results of operations during the periods presented herein.

The following table sets forth the total assets for the reportable segments as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Civil

$

2,152,123 

 

$

1,957,991 

Building

 

917,317 

 

 

711,201 

Specialty Contractors

 

813,851 

 

 

808,598 

Corporate and other (a)

 

155,329 

 

 

383,510 

Total Assets

$

4,038,620 

 

$

3,861,300 

(a)

Consists principally of cash, equipment, tax-related assets and insurance-related assets, offset by the elimination of assets related to intersegment revenue.

Geographic Information

Information concerning principal geographic areas is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

$

4,802,393 

 

$

4,694,165 

 

$

4,323,471 

Foreign and U.S. territories

 

170,683 

 

 

226,307 

 

 

168,838 

Total

$

4,973,076 

 

$

4,920,472 

 

$

4,492,309 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

United States

$

3,911,865 

 

$

3,687,973 

Foreign and U.S. territories

 

126,755 

 

 

173,327 

Total Assets

$

4,038,620 

 

$

3,861,300 

Reconciliation of Segment Information to Consolidated Amounts

The following table reconciles segment results to the consolidated income before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Income from construction operations

$

201,920 

 

$

105,413 

 

$

241,690 

Other income (expense), net

 

6,977 

 

 

13,569 

 

 

(8,217)

Interest expense

 

(59,782)

 

 

(45,143)

 

 

(46,035)

Income before income taxes

$

149,115 

 

$

73,839 

 

$

187,438 

11.     Related Party Transactions



The Company leases certain facilities from an entity owned by Ronald N. Tutor, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, at market lease rates. Under these leases the Company paid $2.8 million,  $2.7 million $2.4 million and $2.5$2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016,  2015 2014 and 2013,2014, respectively, and recognized expense of $3.2 million for theeach year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and $2.5 million for both the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.2014.  



Raymond R. Oneglia, Vice Chairman of O&G Industries, Inc. (“O&G”), is a director of the Company. The Company occasionally forms construction project joint ventures with O&G, and O&G owns 500,000 sharesoften provides equipment and services for the projects on customary

F-33


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

trade terms. Currently, the Company’s common stock. The Company and O&G formedhas a 30% interest in a joint venture to provide contracting services for a highway construction project.  O&G provides equipment and services toThe payments made by the joint venture on customary trade terms. The joint venture paidto O&G $10.7 million, $7.0 million and $6.9 million forduring the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and 2013, respectively. The Company has a 30% percent interest in the joint venture, which it accounts for using the proportionate consolidation method.were immaterial.



Peter Arkley, Senior Managing Director, Construction Services Group, of Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. (“Alliant”), is a director of the Company. The Company uses Alliant for various insurance related services. The Company paid Alliant $9.8 million, $14.2 million and $9.5 millionassociated expenses for services provided for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $8.9 million,  $9.8 million and 2013,$14.2 million, respectively. The Company owed Alliant $7.5$5.2 million and $4.0$7.5 million as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively, for services rendered.

  

12.     Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data



The following table presents selected unaudited quarterly financial data for each full quarterly period of 20152016 and 2014:2015:



(in thousands, except per share amounts)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

Revenues

 

$

1,066,465 

 

$

1,312,438 

 

$

1,340,739 

 

$

1,200,830 

 

$

1,085,369 

 

$

1,308,130 

 

$

1,332,978 

 

$

1,246,599 

Gross profit

 

90,759 

 

98,620 

 

100,201 

 

66,673 

 

105,092 

 

109,770 

 

124,668 

 

117,660 

Income from construction operations

 

20,084 

 

30,881 

 

38,974 

 

15,474 

 

40,122 

 

48,829 

 

60,919 

 

52,050 

Income before income taxes

 

8,205 

 

19,992 

 

33,955 

 

11,687 

 

26,724 

 

35,780 

 

47,926 

 

38,685 

Net income

 

5,126 

 

11,777 

 

19,677 

 

8,712 

 

15,400 

 

21,361 

 

28,801 

 

30,260 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.11 

 

$

0.24 

 

$

0.40 

 

$

0.18 

 

$

0.31 

 

$

0.43 

 

$

0.59 

 

$

0.62 

Diluted (a)

 

0.10 

 

0.24 

 

0.40 

 

0.18 

 

0.31 

 

0.43 

 

0.57 

 

0.60 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Year Ended December 31, 2014

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

Revenues

 

$

955,233 

 

$

1,084,510 

 

$

1,250,689 

 

$

1,201,877 

 

$

1,066,465 

 

$

1,312,438 

 

$

1,340,739 

 

$

1,200,830 

Gross profit

 

105,347 

 

129,531 

 

140,841 

 

129,723 

 

90,759 

 

98,620 

 

100,201 

 

66,673 

Income from construction operations

 

41,497 

 

65,443 

 

70,354 

 

64,396 

 

20,084 

 

30,881 

 

38,974 

 

15,474 

Income before income taxes

 

27,293 

 

47,612 

 

58,616 

 

53,917 

 

8,205 

 

19,992 

 

33,955 

 

11,687 

Net income

 

15,939 

 

28,545 

 

35,730 

 

27,722 

 

5,126 

 

11,777 

 

19,677 

 

8,712 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.33 

 

$

0.59 

 

$

0.74 

 

$

0.57 

 

$

0.11 

 

$

0.24 

 

$

0.40 

 

$

0.18 

Diluted (b)

 

0.33 

 

0.58 

 

0.73 

 

0.56 

 

0.10 

 

0.24 

 

0.40 

 

0.18 





  

F-34


Table of Contents

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13.     Separate Financial Information of Subsidiary Guarantors of Indebtedness



As discussed in Note 5, theThe Company’s obligation to pay principal and interestobligations on its 7.625% senior unsecured notes due November 1, 2018, is2010 Notes are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries that guarantee obligations under the Company’s2014 Credit AgreementFacility (the “Guarantors”). The guarantees are full and unconditional as well as joint and theseveral. The Guarantors are 100%-owned bywholly owned subsidiaries of the Company.



The following supplemental condensed consolidating financial information reflects the summarized financial information of the Company as the issuer of the senior unsecured notes, the Guarantors and the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis.

F-33F-35

 


 

Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET -STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152016

(in thousands)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

47,196 

 

$

26,892 

 

$

1,364 

 

$

 —

 

$

75,452 

Restricted cash

 

3,369 

 

 

3,283 

 

 

39,201 

 

 

 —

 

 

45,853 

Accounts receivable

 

358,437 

 

 

1,179,919 

 

 

82,004 

 

 

(146,745)

 

 

1,473,615 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

114,580 

 

 

868,026 

 

 

152 

 

 

(77,583)

 

 

905,175 

Deferred income taxes

 

2,255 

 

 

21,356 

 

 

2,695 

 

 

 —

 

 

26,306 

Other current assets

 

60,119 

 

 

48,482 

 

 

11,662 

 

 

(11,419)

 

 

108,844 

Total current assets

$

585,956 

 

$

2,147,958 

 

$

137,078 

 

$

(235,747)

 

$

2,635,245 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term investments

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Property and equipment, net

 

105,306 

 

 

414,143 

 

 

4,076 

 

 

 —

 

 

523,525 

Intercompany notes and receivables

 

 —

 

 

148,637 

 

 

 —

 

 

(148,637)

 

 

 —

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Goodwill

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

   Intangible assets, net

 

 —

 

 

96,540 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

96,540 

   Investment in subsidiaries

 

1,962,983 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,962,983)

 

 

 —

   Other

 

64,486 

 

 

128,094 

 

 

15,268 

 

 

(5,723)

 

 

202,125 

 

$

2,718,731 

 

$

3,520,378 

 

$

156,422 

 

$

(2,353,090)

 

$

4,042,441 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

$

107,283 

 

$

41,634 

 

$

 —

 

$

(60,000)

 

$

88,917 

Accounts payable

 

211,679 

 

 

890,268 

 

 

3,222 

 

 

(167,705)

 

 

937,464 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

89,303 

 

 

203,003 

 

 

1,716 

 

 

(5,711)

 

 

288,311 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

6,145 

 

 

115,392 

 

 

39,810 

 

 

(2,331)

 

 

159,016 

Total Current Liabilities

$

414,410 

 

$

1,250,297 

 

$

44,748 

 

$

(235,747)

 

$

1,473,708 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

 

659,433 

 

 

80,821 

 

 

 —

 

 

(5,723)

 

 

734,531 

Deferred income taxes

 

 —

 

 

273,310 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

273,310 

Other long-term liabilities

 

106,588 

 

 

3,278 

 

 

30,799 

 

 

 —

 

 

140,665 

Intercompany notes and advances payable

 

118,073 

 

 

 —

 

 

30,564 

 

 

(148,637)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingencies and commitments

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,420,227 

 

 

1,912,672 

 

 

50,311 

 

 

(1,962,983)

 

 

1,420,227 

 

$

2,718,731 

 

$

3,520,378 

 

$

156,422 

 

$

(2,353,090)

 

$

4,042,441 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 



Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total



Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Revenue

$

977,298 

 

$

4,316,658 

 

$

16,547 

 

$

(337,427)

 

$

4,973,076 

Cost of operations

 

(861,695)

 

 

(3,991,618)

 

 

 —

 

 

337,427 

 

 

(4,515,886)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

$

115,603 

 

$

325,040 

 

$

16,547 

 

$

 —

 

$

457,190 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

 

(85,014)

 

 

(168,394)

 

 

(1,862)

 

 

 —

 

 

(255,270)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

$

30,589 

 

$

156,646 

 

$

14,685 

 

$

 —

 

$

201,920 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

113,369 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(113,369)

 

 

 —

Other income, net

 

892 

 

 

6,294 

 

 

1,002 

 

 

(1,211)

 

 

6,977 

Interest expense

 

(58,787)

 

 

(2,206)

 

 

 —

 

 

1,211 

 

 

(59,782)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) before income taxes

 

86,063 

 

 

160,734 

 

 

15,687 

 

 

(113,369)

 

 

149,115 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

9,759 

 

 

(57,446)

 

 

(5,606)

 

 

 —

 

 

(53,293)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

$

95,822 

 

$

103,288 

 

$

10,081 

 

$

(113,369)

 

$

95,822 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Other comprehensive income of subsidiaries

 

(601)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

601 

 

 

 —

 Change in pension benefit plans assets/liabilities

 

(2,623)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,623)

 Foreign currency translation

 

 —

 

 

(261)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(261)

 Change in fair value of investments

 

 —

 

 

(340)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(340)

 Change in fair value of interest rate swap

 

(24)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(24)

 Total other comprehensive (loss) income

 

(3,248)

 

 

(601)

 

 

 —

 

 

601 

 

 

(3,248)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

$

92,574 

 

$

102,687 

 

$

10,081 

 

$

(112,768)

 

$

92,574 



F-34


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET - DECEMBER 31, 2014

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

75,087 

 

$

36,764 

 

$

23,732 

 

$

 —

 

$

135,583 

Restricted cash

 

3,369 

 

 

5,274 

 

 

35,727 

 

 

 —

 

 

44,370 

Accounts receivable

 

299,427 

 

 

1,246,635 

 

 

37,064 

 

 

(103,622)

 

 

1,479,504 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

70,344 

 

 

700,362 

 

 

152 

 

 

(44,456)

 

 

726,402 

Deferred income taxes

 

 —

 

 

15,639 

 

 

 —

 

 

2,323 

 

 

17,962 

Other current assets

 

39,196 

 

 

42,750 

 

 

24,397 

 

 

(37,608)

 

 

68,735 

Total current assets

$

487,423 

 

$

2,047,424 

 

$

121,072 

 

$

(183,363)

 

$

2,472,556 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term investments

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Property and equipment, net

 

92,413 

 

 

430,876 

 

 

4,313 

 

 

 —

 

 

527,602 

Intercompany notes and receivables

 

 —

 

 

122,401 

 

 

 —

 

 

(122,401)

 

 

 —

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Goodwill

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

   Intangible assets, net

 

 —

 

 

100,254 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

100,254 

   Investment in subsidiaries

 

2,154,562 

 

 

19,519 

 

 

50 

 

 

(2,174,131)

 

 

 —

   Other

 

83,503 

 

 

9,847 

 

 

 —

 

 

(5,453)

 

 

87,897 

 

$

2,817,901 

 

$

3,315,327 

 

$

125,435 

 

$

(2,485,348)

 

$

3,773,315 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

34,776 

 

 

46,516 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

81,292 

Accounts payable

 

186,958 

 

 

716,851 

 

 

3,749 

 

 

(109,384)

 

 

798,174 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

139,020 

 

 

185,807 

 

 

2,672 

 

 

(8,203)

 

 

319,296 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

33,018 

 

 

95,177 

 

 

58,571 

 

 

(26,952)

 

 

159,814 

Total Current Liabilities

$

393,772 

 

$

1,044,351 

 

$

64,992 

 

$

(144,539)

 

$

1,358,576 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

 

712,460 

 

 

112,060 

 

 

 —

 

 

(40,453)

 

 

784,067 

Deferred income taxes

 

142,457 

 

 

7,914 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

150,371 

Other long-term liabilities

 

112,899 

 

 

1,897 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

114,796 

Intercompany notes and advances payable

 

90,373 

 

 

 —

 

 

35,619 

 

 

(125,992)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingencies and commitments

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,365,939 

 

 

2,149,105 

 

 

24,824 

 

 

(2,174,363)

 

 

1,365,505 

 

$

2,817,900 

 

$

3,315,327 

 

$

125,435 

 

$

(2,485,347)

 

$

3,773,315 

  

  

F-35F-36

 


 

Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

(in thousands)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

Total

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

Total

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Revenue

$

1,064,723 

 

$

4,104,871 

 

$

13,405 

 

$

(262,527)

 

$

4,920,472 

$

1,064,723 

 

$

4,104,871 

 

$

13,405 

 

$

(262,527)

 

$

4,920,472 

Cost of operations

 

(918,322)

 

 

(3,908,424)

 

 

 —

 

 

262,527 

 

 

(4,564,219)

 

(918,322)

 

 

(3,908,424)

 

 

 —

 

 

262,527 

 

 

(4,564,219)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

$

146,401 

 

$

196,447 

 

$

13,405 

 

$

 —

 

$

356,253 

$

146,401 

 

$

196,447 

 

$

13,405 

 

$

 —

 

$

356,253 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

 

(77,806)

 

 

(171,153)

 

 

(1,881)

 

 

 —

 

 

(250,840)

 

(77,806)

 

 

(171,153)

 

 

(1,881)

 

 

 —

 

 

(250,840)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

$

68,595 

 

$

25,294 

 

$

11,524 

 

$

 —

 

$

105,413 

$

68,595 

 

$

25,294 

 

$

11,524 

 

$

 —

 

$

105,413 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

23,367 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(23,367)

 

 

 —

 

23,367 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(23,367)

 

 

 —

Other income, net

 

8,155 

 

 

3,745 

 

 

553 

 

 

 —

 

 

12,453 

Other (expense) income, net

 

9,271 

 

 

3,745 

 

 

553 

 

 

 —

 

 

13,569 

Interest expense

 

(41,007)

 

 

(3,020)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(44,027)

 

(42,123)

 

 

(3,020)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(45,143)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) before income taxes

 

59,110 

 

 

26,019 

 

 

12,077 

 

 

(23,367)

 

 

73,839 

 

59,110 

 

 

26,019 

 

 

12,077 

 

 

(23,367)

 

 

73,839 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

(13,818)

 

 

(10,060)

 

 

(4,669)

 

 

 —

 

 

(28,547)

 

(13,818)

 

 

(10,060)

 

 

(4,669)

 

 

 —

 

 

(28,547)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

$

45,292 

 

$

15,959 

 

$

7,408 

 

$

(23,367)

 

$

45,292 

$

45,292 

 

$

15,959 

 

$

7,408 

 

$

(23,367)

 

$

45,292 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income of subsidiaries

 

(2,448)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,448 

 

 —

 

(2,448)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,448 

 

 —

Change in pension benefit plans assets/liabilities

 

2,026 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

2,026 

 

2,026 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

2,026 

Foreign currency translation

 

 —

 

(3,214)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(3,214)

 

 —

 

(3,214)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(3,214)

Change in fair value of investments

 

 —

 

766 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

766 

 

 —

 

766 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

766 

Change in fair value of interest rate swap

 

(125)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(125)

 

(125)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(125)

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

 

(547)

 

 

(2,448)

 

 

 —

 

 

2,448 

 

 

(547)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(547)

 

 

(2,448)

 

 

 —

 

 

2,448 

 

 

(547)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

$

44,745 

 

$

13,511 

 

$

7,408 

 

$

(20,919)

 

$

44,745 

$

44,745 

 

$

13,511 

 

$

7,408 

 

$

(20,919)

 

$

44,745 

  

  

F-36F-37

 


 

Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

Total

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

Total

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Revenue

$

959,010 

 

$

3,690,075 

 

$

 —

 

$

(156,776)

 

$

4,492,309 

$

959,010 

 

$

3,690,075 

 

$

 —

 

$

(156,776)

 

$

4,492,309 

Cost of operations

 

(808,285)

 

 

(3,353,098)

 

 

17,740 

 

 

156,776 

 

 

(3,986,867)

Cost of Operations

 

(808,285)

 

 

(3,353,098)

 

 

17,740 

 

 

156,776 

 

 

(3,986,867)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

150,725 

 

 

336,977 

 

 

17,740 

 

 

 —

 

 

505,442 

Gross Profit

$

150,725 

 

$

336,977 

 

$

17,740 

 

$

 —

 

$

505,442 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

 

(80,151)

 

 

(181,714)

 

 

(1,887)

 

 

 —

 

 

(263,752)

General and Administrative Expenses

 

(80,151)

 

 

(181,714)

 

 

(1,887)

 

 

 —

 

 

(263,752)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

 

70,574 

 

 

155,263 

 

 

15,853 

 

 

 —

 

 

241,690 

$

70,574 

 

$

155,263 

 

$

15,853 

 

$

 —

 

$

241,690 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

95,501 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(95,501)

 

 

 —

 

95,501 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(95,501)

 

 

 —

Other (expense) income, net

 

(8,322)

 

 

(1,705)

 

 

491 

 

 

 —

 

 

(9,536)

 

(7,003)

 

 

(1,705)

 

 

491 

 

 

 —

 

 

(8,217)

Interest expense

 

(40,658)

 

 

(4,058)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(44,716)

 

(41,977)

 

 

(4,058)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(46,035)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) before income taxes

 

117,095 

 

 

149,500 

 

 

16,344 

 

 

(95,501)

 

 

187,438 

 

117,095 

 

 

149,500 

 

 

16,344 

 

 

(95,501)

 

 

187,438 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

(9,159)

 

 

(63,411)

 

 

(6,932)

 

 

 —

 

 

(79,502)

 

(9,159)

 

 

(63,411)

 

 

(6,932)

 

 

 —

 

 

(79,502)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

$

107,936 

 

$

86,089 

 

$

9,412 

 

$

(95,501)

 

$

107,936 

$

107,936 

 

$

86,089 

 

$

9,412 

 

$

(95,501)

 

$

107,936 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income of subsidiaries

 

(433)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

433 

 

 —

 

(433)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

433 

 

 —

Change in pension benefit plans assets/liabilities

 

(8,155)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(8,155)

 

(8,155)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(8,155)

Foreign currency translation

 

 —

 

(638)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(638)

 

 —

 

(638)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(638)

Change in fair value of investments

 

 —

 

205 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

205 

 

 —

 

205 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

205 

Change in fair value of interest rate swap

 

349 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

349 

 

349 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

349 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(8,239)

 

 

(433)

 

 

 —

 

 

433 

 

 

(8,239)

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

 

(8,239)

 

 

(433)

 

 

 —

 

 

433 

 

 

(8,239)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

$

99,697 

 

$

85,656 

 

$

9,412 

 

$

(95,068)

 

$

99,697 

$

99,697 

 

$

85,656 

 

$

9,412 

 

$

(95,068)

 

$

99,697 





F-37F-38

 


 

Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET - DECEMBER 31, 2016

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 



Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total



Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

80,829 

 

$

65,079 

 

$

195 

 

$

 —

 

$

146,103 

Restricted cash

 

2,016 

 

 

2,211 

 

 

46,277 

 

 

 —

 

 

50,504 

Accounts receivable

 

426,176 

 

 

1,441,263 

 

 

107,380 

 

 

(231,519)

 

 

1,743,300 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

140,901 

 

 

758,158 

 

 

152 

 

 

(67,385)

 

 

831,826 

Other current assets

 

76,453 

 

 

38,889 

 

 

7,498 

 

 

(56,817)

 

 

66,023 

Total current assets

$

726,375 

 

$

2,305,600 

 

$

161,502 

 

$

(355,721)

 

$

2,837,756 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

$

74,739 

 

$

399,091 

 

$

3,796 

 

$

 —

 

$

477,626 

Intercompany notes and receivables

 

 —

 

 

242,382 

 

 

 —

 

 

(242,382)

 

 

 —

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Goodwill

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

   Intangible assets, net

 

 —

 

 

92,997 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

92,997 

   Investment in subsidiaries

 

2,223,971 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,223,971)

 

 

 —

   Other

 

42,324 

 

 

8,905 

 

 

2,407 

 

 

(8,401)

 

 

45,235 



$

3,067,409 

 

$

3,633,981 

 

$

167,705 

 

$

(2,830,475)

 

$

4,038,620 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

$

122,166 

 

$

23,724 

 

$

 —

 

$

(60,000)

 

$

85,890 

Accounts payable

 

280,342 

 

 

937,428 

 

 

2,495 

 

 

(226,249)

 

 

994,016 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

102,373 

 

 

229,746 

 

 

19,564 

 

 

(20,571)

 

 

331,112 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

60,227 

 

 

76,002 

 

 

20,597 

 

 

(48,901)

 

 

107,925 

Total Current Liabilities

$

565,108 

 

$

1,266,900 

 

$

42,656 

 

$

(355,721)

 

$

1,518,943 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

$

614,608 

 

$

65,015 

 

$

 —

 

$

(5,994)

 

$

673,629 

Deferred income taxes

 

16,475 

 

 

116,939 

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,407)

 

 

131,007 

Other long-term liabilities

 

111,108 

 

 

2,415 

 

 

48,495 

 

 

 —

 

 

162,018 

Intercompany notes and advances payable

 

207,087 

 

 

 —

 

 

35,295 

 

 

(242,382)

 

 

 —



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingencies and commitments

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,553,023 

 

 

2,182,712 

 

 

41,259 

 

 

(2,223,971)

 

 

1,553,023 



$

3,067,409 

 

$

3,633,981 

 

$

167,705 

 

$

(2,830,475)

 

$

4,038,620 

F-39


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET - DECEMBER 31, 2015

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 



Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total



Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

47,196 

 

$

26,892 

 

$

1,364 

 

$

 —

 

$

75,452 

Restricted cash

 

3,369 

 

 

3,283 

 

 

39,201 

 

 

 —

 

 

45,853 

Accounts receivable

 

358,437 

 

 

1,179,919 

 

 

82,004 

 

 

(146,745)

 

 

1,473,615 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings

 

114,580 

 

 

868,026 

 

 

152 

 

 

(77,583)

 

 

905,175 

Other current assets

 

60,119 

 

 

48,482 

 

 

11,662 

 

 

(11,419)

 

 

108,844 

Total current assets

$

583,701 

 

$

2,126,602 

 

$

134,383 

 

$

(235,747)

 

$

2,608,939 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

$

105,306 

 

$

414,143 

 

$

4,076 

 

$

 —

 

$

523,525 

Intercompany notes and receivables

 

 —

 

 

148,637 

 

 

 —

 

 

(148,637)

 

 

 —

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

   Goodwill

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

585,006 

   Intangible assets, net

 

 —

 

 

96,540 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

96,540 

   Investment in subsidiaries

 

1,962,983 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,962,983)

 

 

 —

   Other

 

60,978 

 

 

7,067 

 

 

3,392 

 

 

(24,147)

 

 

47,290 



$

2,712,968 

 

$

3,377,995 

 

$

141,851 

 

$

(2,371,514)

 

$

3,861,300 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

$

107,283 

 

$

41,634 

 

$

 —

 

$

(60,000)

 

$

88,917 

Accounts payable

 

211,679 

 

 

890,268 

 

 

3,222 

 

 

(167,705)

 

 

937,464 

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings

 

89,303 

 

 

203,003 

 

 

1,716 

 

 

(5,711)

 

 

288,311 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

6,146 

 

 

123,497 

 

 

25,239 

 

 

(20,755)

 

 

134,127 

Total Current Liabilities

$

414,411 

 

$

1,258,402 

 

$

30,177 

 

$

(254,171)

 

$

1,448,819 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

$

653,669 

 

$

80,821 

 

$

 —

 

$

(5,723)

 

$

728,767 

Deferred income taxes

 

 —

 

 

122,822 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

122,822 

Other long-term liabilities

 

106,588 

 

 

3,278 

 

 

30,799 

 

 

 —

 

 

140,665 

Intercompany notes and advances payable

 

118,073 

 

 

 —

 

 

30,564 

 

 

(148,637)

 

 

 —



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingencies and commitments

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,420,227 

 

 

1,912,672 

 

 

50,311 

 

 

(1,962,983)

 

 

1,420,227 



$

2,712,968 

 

$

3,377,995 

 

$

141,851 

 

$

(2,371,514)

 

$

3,861,300 

F-40


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONSCASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20132016

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Revenue

$

680,440 

 

$

3,315,608 

 

$

 —

 

$

179,624 

 

$

4,175,672 

Cost of Operations

 

(590,675)

 

 

(2,960,569)

 

 

22,100 

 

 

(179,624)

 

 

(3,708,768)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Profit

 

89,765 

 

 

355,039 

 

 

22,100 

 

 

 —

 

 

466,904 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

(77,507)

 

 

(183,723)

 

 

(1,852)

 

 

 —

 

 

(263,082)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

 

12,258 

 

 

171,316 

 

 

20,248 

 

 

 —

 

 

203,822 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

122,875 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(122,875)

 

 

 —

Other (expense) income, net

 

(27,162)

 

 

8,075 

 

 

512 

 

 

 —

 

 

(18,575)

Interest expense

 

(41,987)

 

 

(3,645)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(45,632)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) before income taxes

 

65,984 

 

 

175,746 

 

 

20,760 

 

 

(122,875)

 

 

139,615 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit (Provision) for income taxes

 

21,312 

 

 

(65,852)

 

 

(7,779)

 

 

 —

 

 

(52,319)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME  (LOSS)

$

87,296 

 

$

109,894 

 

$

12,981 

 

$

(122,875)

 

$

87,296 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income of subsidiaries

 

(1,293)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,293 

 

 

 —

Change in pension benefit plans assets/liabilities

 

10,910 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,910 

Foreign currency translation

 

 —

 

 

(738)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(738)

Change in fair value of investments

 

 —

 

 

(555)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(555)

Change in fair value of interest rate swap

 

578 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

578 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

 

10,195 

 

 

(1,293)

 

 

 —

 

 

1,293 

 

 

10,195 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

$

97,491 

 

$

108,601 

 

$

12,981 

 

$

(121,582)

 

$

97,491 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 



Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total



Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

95,822 

 

$

103,288 

 

$

10,081 

 

$

(113,369)

 

$

95,822 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

31,660 

 

 

35,362 

 

 

280 

 

 

 —

 

 

67,302 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

(113,369)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

113,369 

 

 

 —

Share-based compensation expense

 

13,423 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13,423 

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

(269)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(269)

Change in debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs

 

10,968 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,968 

Deferred income taxes

 

2,256 

 

 

(12,425)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(10,169)

(Gain) loss on sale of investments

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment

 

148 

 

 

305 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

453 

Other long-term liabilities

 

4,168 

 

 

6,346 

 

 

17,696 

 

 

 —

 

 

28,210 

Other non-cash items

 

(1,125)

 

 

(749)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,874)

Changes in other components of working capital 

 

(108,973)

 

 

46,309 

 

 

(27,866)

 

 

 —

 

 

(90,530)

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

$

(65,291)

 

$

178,436 

 

$

191 

 

$

 —

 

$

113,336 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment excluding financed purchases

 

(1,405)

 

 

(14,338)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(15,743)

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

164 

 

 

1,735 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,899 

(Increase) decrease in intercompany advances

 

 —

 

 

(94,732)

 

 

 —

 

 

94,732 

 

 

 —

Change in restricted cash

 

1,353 

 

 

1,072 

 

 

(7,076)

 

 

 —

 

 

(4,651)

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

$

112 

 

$

(106,263)

 

$

(7,076)

 

$

94,732 

 

$

(18,495)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Convertible Notes

 

200,000 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

200,000 

Proceeds from debt

 

1,348,800 

 

 

5,095 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,353,895 

Repayment of debt

 

(1,523,603)

 

 

(39,081)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,562,684)

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

269 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

269 

Issuance of common stock and effect of cashless exercise

 

(584)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(584)

Debt issuance costs

 

(15,086)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(15,086)

Increase (decrease) in intercompany advances

 

89,016 

 

 

 —

 

 

5,716 

 

 

(94,732)

 

 

 —

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

$

98,812 

 

$

(33,986)

 

$

5,716 

 

$

(94,732)

 

$

(24,190)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

33,633 

 

 

38,187 

 

 

(1,169)

 

 

 —

 

 

70,651 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year

 

47,196 

 

 

26,892 

 

 

1,364 

 

 

 —

 

 

75,452 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year

$

80,829 

 

$

65,079 

 

$

195 

 

$

 —

 

$

146,103 

  

  

F-38F-41

 


 

Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

Total

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

Total

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

45,292 

 

$

15,959 

 

$

7,408 

 

$

(23,367)

 

$

45,292 

$

45,292 

 

$

15,959 

 

$

7,408 

 

$

(23,367)

 

$

45,292 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

10,707 

 

 

32,746 

 

 

276 

 

 —

 

43,729 

 

8,612 

 

 

32,746 

 

 

276 

 

 

 —

 

41,634 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

(23,367)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

23,367 

 

 —

 

(23,367)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

23,367 

 

 —

share-based compensation expense

 

9,477 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

9,477 

Share-based compensation expense

 

9,477 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

9,477 

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

(186)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(186)

 

(186)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(186)

Change in debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs

 

2,095 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

2,095 

Adjustment interest rate swap to fair value

 

(224)

 

 

224 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

(224)

 

 

224 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

Deferred income taxes

 

1,399 

 

 

36,083 

 

 

(15,268)

 

 

 —

 

22,214 

 

1,399 

 

 

36,083 

 

 

(15,268)

 

 

 —

 

22,214 

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment

 

82 

 

 

(2,991)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(2,909)

 

82 

 

 

(2,991)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(2,909)

Other long-term liabilities

 

(3,157)

 

 

32,069 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

28,912 

 

(3,157)

 

 

32,069 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

28,912 

Other non-cash items

 

(248)

 

 

(3,432)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(3,680)

 

(248)

 

 

(3,432)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(3,680)

Changes in other components of working capital

 

(154,300)

 

 

49,868 

 

 

(24,345)

 

 

 —

 

 

(128,777)

 

(154,300)

 

 

49,868 

 

 

(24,345)

 

 

 —

 

 

(128,777)

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

$

(114,525)

 

$

160,526 

 

$

(31,929)

 

$

 —

 

$

14,072 

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

$

(114,525)

 

$

160,526 

 

$

(31,929)

 

$

 —

 

$

14,072 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment excluding financed purchases

 

(21,587)

 

(14,286)

 

(39)

 

 —

 

(35,912)

 

(21,587)

 

 

(14,286)

 

 

(39)

 

 

 —

 

(35,912)

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

 —

 

4,980 

 

 —

 

 —

 

4,980 

 

 —

 

 

4,980 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

4,980 

(Increase) decrease in intercompany advances

 

 —

 

(102,763)

 

 —

 

102,763 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(102,763)

 

 

 —

 

 

102,763 

 

 —

Change in restricted cash

 

 —

 

 

1,991 

 

 

(3,474)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,483)

 

 —

 

 

1,991 

 

 

(3,474)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,483)

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

$

(21,587)

 

$

(110,078)

 

$

(3,513)

 

$

102,763 

 

$

(32,415)

$

(21,587)

 

$

(110,078)

 

$

(3,513)

 

$

102,763 

 

$

(32,415)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt

 

981,855 

 

31,350 

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,013,205 

 

981,855 

 

 

31,350 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

1,013,205 

Repayment of debt

 

(962,701)

 

(91,670)

 

 —

 

 —

 

(1,054,371)

 

(962,701)

 

 

(91,670)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(1,054,371)

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

186 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

186 

 

186 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

186 

Issuance of common stock and effect of cashless exercise

 

(808)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

(808)

 

(808)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(808)

Increase (decrease) in intercompany advances

 

89,689 

 

 

 —

 

 

13,074 

 

 

(102,763)

 

 

 —

 

89,689 

 

 

 —

 

 

13,074 

 

 

(102,763)

 

 

 —

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

$

108,221 

 

$

(60,320)

 

$

13,074 

 

$

(102,763)

 

$

(41,788)

$

108,221 

 

$

(60,320)

 

$

13,074 

 

$

(102,763)

 

$

(41,788)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(27,891)

 

(9,872)

 

(22,368)

 

 —

 

(60,131)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(27,891)

 

 

(9,872)

 

 

(22,368)

 

 

 —

 

(60,131)

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year

 

75,087 

 

 

36,764 

 

 

23,732 

 

 

 —

 

 

135,583 

 

75,087 

 

 

36,764 

 

 

23,732 

 

 

 —

 

 

135,583 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

$

47,196 

 

$

26,892 

 

$

1,364 

 

$

 —

 

$

75,452 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year

$

47,196 

 

$

26,892 

 

$

1,364 

 

$

 —

 

$

75,452 

  

  

F-39


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

107,936 

 

$

86,089 

 

$

9,412 

 

$

(95,501)

 

$

107,936 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

4,592 

 

 

51,109 

 

 

271 

 

 

 —

 

 

55,972 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

(95,501)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

95,501 

 

 

 —

share-based compensation expense

 

19,256 

 

 

(641)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

18,615 

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

(787)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

(787)

Deferred income taxes

 

39,186 

 

 

(17,726)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

21,460 

(Gain) loss on sale of investments

 

1,786 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,786 

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment

 

833 

 

 

(32)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

801 

Other long-term liabilities

 

20,221 

 

 

(17,147)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,074 

Other non-cash items

 

(7,029)

 

 

10,302 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,273 

Changes in other components of working capital 

 

(26,100)

 

 

(264,203)

 

 

21,495 

 

 

 —

 

 

(268,808)

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

$

64,393 

 

$

(152,249)

 

$

31,178 

 

$

 —

 

$

(56,678)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment

 

(17,626)

 

 

(57,387)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(75,013)

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

(784)

 

 

6,119 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

5,335 

Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities

 

44,497 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

44,497 

Change in restricted cash

 

15,464 

 

 

2,766 

 

 

(20,006)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,776)

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

$

41,551 

 

$

(48,502)

 

$

(20,006)

 

$

 —

 

$

(26,957)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt

 

1,078,932 

 

 

77,807 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,156,739 

Repayment of debt

 

(957,830)

 

 

(68,519)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,026,349)

Business acquisition related payments

 

(26,430)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(26,430)

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

787 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

787 

Issuance of common stock and effect of cashless exercise

 

(1,772)

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,771)

Debt issuance costs

 

(3,681)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,681)

Increase (decrease) in intercompany advances

 

(209,858)

 

 

210,195 

 

 

(337)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

$

(119,852)

 

$

219,484 

 

$

(337)

 

$

 —

 

$

99,295 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(13,908)

 

 

18,733 

 

 

10,835 

 

 

 —

 

 

15,660 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year

 

88,995 

 

 

18,031 

 

 

12,897 

 

 

 —

 

 

119,923 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

$

75,087 

 

$

36,764 

 

$

23,732 

 

$

 —

 

$

135,583 

F-40F-42

 


 

Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20132014

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

Total

Tutor Perini

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

 

 

Total

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

87,296 

 

$

109,894 

 

$

12,981 

 

$

(122,875)

 

$

87,296 

$

107,936 

 

$

86,089 

 

$

9,412 

 

$

(95,501)

 

$

107,936 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

10,893 

 

 

48,246 

 

 

271 

 

 

 —

 

59,410 

 

2,322 

 

 

51,109 

 

 

271 

 

 

 —

 

53,702 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

(122,875)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

122,875 

 

 —

 

(95,501)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

95,501 

 

 —

share-based compensation expense

 

6,623 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

6,623 

Share-based compensation expense

 

19,256 

 

 

(641)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

18,615 

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

(1,148)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

(1,148)

 

(787)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

(787)

Change in debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs

 

2,270 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

2,270 

Deferred income taxes

 

921 

 

 

8,088 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

9,009 

 

39,186 

 

 

(17,726)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

21,460 

(Gain) loss on sale of investments

 

1,786 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

1,786 

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment

 

 —

 

 

49 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

49 

 

833 

 

 

(32)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

801 

Other long-term liabilities

 

24,359 

 

 

(1,252)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

23,107 

 

20,221 

 

 

(17,147)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

3,074 

Other non-cash items

 

(4,341)

 

 

622 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(3,719)

 

(7,029)

 

 

10,302 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

3,273 

Changes in other components of working capital

 

72,359 

 

 

(184,543)

 

 

(17,715)

 

 

 —

 

 

(129,899)

 

(26,100)

 

 

(264,203)

 

 

21,495 

 

 

 —

 

 

(268,808)

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

$

74,087 

 

$

(18,896)

 

$

(4,463)

 

$

 —

 

$

50,728 

$

64,393 

 

$

(152,249)

 

$

31,178 

 

$

 —

 

$

(56,678)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment

 

(21,267)

 

 

(21,093)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(42,360)

 

(17,626)

 

 

(57,387)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(75,013)

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

 

 

2,657 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

2,663 

 

(784)

 

 

6,119 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

5,335 

Proceeds from sale of investments

 

44,497 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

44,497 

Change in restricted cash

 

11,403 

 

 

441 

 

 

(15,721)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,877)

 

15,464 

 

 

2,766 

 

 

(20,006)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,776)

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

$

(9,858)

 

$

(17,995)

 

$

(15,721)

 

$

 —

 

$

(43,574)

$

41,551 

 

$

(48,502)

 

$

(20,006)

 

$

 —

 

$

(26,957)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt

 

627,520 

 

 

25,760 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

653,280 

 

1,078,932 

 

 

77,807 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

1,156,739 

Repayment of debt

 

(647,795)

 

 

(29,000)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(676,795)

 

(957,830)

 

 

(68,519)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(1,026,349)

Business acquisition related payments

 

(31,038)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(31,038)

Payments related to business acquisitions

 

(26,430)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(26,430)

Excess income tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

1,148 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

1,148 

 

787 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

787 

Issuance of common stock and effect of cashless exercise

 

(1,882)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(1,882)

 

(1,772)

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(1,771)

Debt issuance costs

 

(3,681)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(3,681)

Increase (decrease) in intercompany advances

 

12,150 

 

 

(16,223)

 

 

4,073 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(209,858)

 

 

210,195 

 

 

(337)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

$

(39,897)

 

$

(19,463)

 

$

4,073 

 

$

 —

 

$

(55,287)

$

(119,852)

 

$

219,484 

 

$

(337)

 

$

 —

 

$

99,295 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

24,332 

 

 

(56,354)

 

 

(16,111)

 

 

 —

 

(48,133)

 

(13,908)

 

 

18,733 

 

 

10,835 

 

 

 —

 

15,660 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year

 

64,663 

 

 

74,385 

 

 

29,008 

 

 

 —

 

 

168,056 

 

88,995 

 

 

18,031 

 

 

12,897 

 

 

 —

 

 

119,923 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

$

88,995 

 

$

18,031 

 

$

12,897 

 

$

 —

 

$

119,923 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year

$

75,087 

 

$

36,764 

 

$

23,732 

 

$

 —

 

$

135,583 

  

  



F-41F-43